Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPRR 19-2707 Renee Basel From:Edward K Allen Sent:Tuesday, April 23, 2019 11:06 AM To:Renee Basel Subject:FW: Public Records Request Regarding Use of Cell Site Simulators From: copwatcher@yahoo.com \[mailto:copwatcher@yahoo.com\] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 8:11 PM To: capricraig@dbpd.us; sdembinsky@cityofdbs.org; weeksma@defuniakspringspolice.net; umbergerj@deland.org; goldmanJ@mydelraybeach.com; Hernan.Organvidez@doralpd.com; mmcquaig@dunnellonpd.org; EdwardsM4@duvalschools.org; jjenkins@eatonvillepolice.com; darcieri@cityofedgewater.org; jfreeburg@edgewood- fl.gov; PoliceChief@villageofelportal.org; gcalhoun@ci.eustis.fl.us; policechief@cityoffellsmere.org; jhurley@fbfl.org; mdoughney@fbpd.org; ptaylor@floridacityfl.gov; greg.hutching@fptc.edu; rmaglione@fortlauderdale.gov; ddiggs@fmpolice.com; dhobley-burney@fppd.org; rbage@fwb.org; mfewless@fruitlandpark.org; jonestr@cityofgainesville.org; rherbello@goldenbeach.us; barleyjk@flcjn.net; dasdot@gcspd.com; balexander@mygretna.com; shawn.ramsey@groveland-fl.gov; rhawthorne@gulfbreezefl.gov; Edward K Allen <EAllen@gulf-stream.org>; rvincent@mygulfport.us; ghester@hainescitypd.com; squinones@cohb.org; tsmith4848@bellsouth.net; chiefdiaz@hgpd.org; sergiov@hialeahfl.gov; jdecoursey@highsprings.us; policeadmin@ci.highland-beach.fl.us; tnagy@townofhillsborobeach.com; saldrich@hollyhillfl.org; Cobrien@hollywoodfl.org; chief@holmesbeach.org; arolle@homesteadpolice.com; rthomas@howey.org; mcasey@indialantic.com; cmaher@icvps.org; dbutler@indianharbour.org; admin@irspsd.org; EDWilliams@myindianshores.com; Lwilburn1@windstream.net; Harold.Peterson@jcsb.org; mark.Stevens@flyjax.com; cevans@jaxbchfl.net; jmcguire1@windstream.net; jennings_policechief@yahoo.com; bsmith@junobeachpd.com; pruittj@jupiterinletcolony.org; rgarlo@tji.martin.fl.us; 1130@jupiter.fl.us Subject: Public Records Request Regarding Use of Cell Site Simulators Re: Public Records Request Regarding Use of Cell Site Simulators I am writing on behalf of COPWATCH to seek records regarding use of cell site simulators by the POLICE AND SHERIFFS. Cell site simulators, also called IMSI catchers (in reference to the unique identifier—or international mobile subscriber identity—of wireless devices), impersonate a wireless service provider’s cell tower, prompting cell phones and other wireless devices to communicate with them. These devices are often called “Stingrays,” after the leading model produced by the Melbourne, Florida-based Harris Corporation. 1 Cell site simulators are commonly used in two ways: to collect unique numeric identifiers associated with phones in a given location, or to ascertain the location of a phone when the officers know the numbers associated with it but don’t know precisely where it is. Both of these uses raise privacy concerns. Collecting unique identifiers of all phones in a particular location inherently collects location data on many innocent people. And using a cell site simulator to ascertain the location of a specific cell phone can reveal that it is in a constitutionally protected place, such as a home, that has traditionally been immune from search unless law enforcement agents obtain a warrant based on probable cause. Press reports and court opinions have revealed that Florida law enforcement agencies use cell site simulators in criminal investigations. 2 For example, the Miami- Dade Police Department purchased a cell site simulator as early as 2006, and the Tallahassee Police Department has been using cell site simulators provided to it on loan by an unnamed company— likely Harris Corporation—since at least 2008. 3 The Florida Department of Law Enforcement has 1  spent more than $3 million buying a fleet of Stingrays that it makes available to local police departments in the state. 4 Despite widespread public interest in the use and abuse of cell site simulators, the public lacks information about the PLLICE AND SHERIFFS policies and practices. Information is needed so the public can determine whether the POLICE AND SHERIFF use of cell site simulators complies with the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and with Florida law. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST In light of the foregoing and pursuant to the Florida Public Records Law, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and Article 1, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution, COPWATCH hereby requests records relating to POLICE AND SHERIFFS use of cell site simulators 5 as detailed below: 1. Records regarding POLICE AND SHERIFFs acquisition of cell site simulators, including invoices, purchase orders, contracts, loan agreements, solicitation letters, correspondence with companies providing the devices, and similar documents. In furtherance of this request, please produce records of all contracts, agreements, and communications with Harris Corporation. 2. Records regarding any offer, arrangement, or agreement with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement ( FDLE ), Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI ), or any corporation to borrow or use cell site simulators owned or possessed by the FDLE, FBI, or corporation. 3. All nondisclosure agreements with Harris Corporation, Boeing Corporation (DRT), other companies, and any state or federal agencies regarding the POLICE AND SHERIFF possession and use of cell site simulators. 4. Records regarding policies and guidelines governing use of cell site simulators, including restrictions on when, where, how, and against whom they may be used, limitations on retention and use of collected data, guidance on when a warrant or other legal process must be obtained, and rules governing when the existence and use of cell site simulators may be revealed to the public, criminal defendants, or judges. 5. Records regarding any communications or agreements with wireless service providers (including AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, Sprint Nextel, and U.S. Cellular) concerning use of cell site simulators. 6. Records regarding any communications, licenses, waivers, or agreements with the Federal Communications Commission or Florida Public Service Commission concerning use of cell site simulators. 7. Records reflecting the number of investigations in which cell site simulators have been used, and the number of those investigations that have resulted in prosecutions. 8. Records reflecting a list of all criminal cases, with docket numbers if available, in which law enforcement officers used a cell site simulator as part of the underlying investigation. 9. All applications submitted to state or federal courts for search warrants or orders authorizing use of cell site simulators in criminal investigations, as well as any warrants or orders, denials of warrants or orders, and returns of warrants associated with those applications. If any responsive records are sealed, please provide the date and docket number for each sealed document. 10. All records regarding the use of cell site simulators in closed investigations. We welcome the opportunity to answer any questions you might have about this request in order to better facilitate the production of the public records. INFORMATION ABOUT THE REQUEST As required by law, please acknowledge that you have received this public records request and provide an estimated timeframe in which you believe that you will be able to produce the requested records. See � 119.07(1)(c), Fla. Stat. ( A custodian of public records and his or her designee must acknowledge requests to inspect or copy records promptly and respond to such requests in good faith. ).COPWATCH is a non-profit organization and the disclosure of the requested records will  promote public awareness and knowledge of governmental actions in order to ensure that governmental officials and agencies remain accountable to the people. Forsberg v. Hous. Auth. of City of Miami Beach, 455 So. 2d 373, 378 (Fla. 1984) (Overton, J., concurring in result). Therefore, we request that you produce the requested records free of charge. However, if you are unable to do 2 so, COPWATCH PLEASE LET US KNOW reasonable costs associated with fulfilling this request, if your office has a policy of requiring the payment of a copying charge for such records. The fees and costs you may charge are governed by Section 119.07(4), Florida Statutes. please contact me with an estimate of the likely cost before proceeding. If you are unable or refuse to provide part or all of the requested public records, please explain in writing and with particularity the reasons for not providing the requested public information in its entirety, as required by Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes. If any exemption that you assert applies to only a portion of the records (as opposed to the entire record), please redact the portion you claim is exempt, provide copies of the remainder of the record or records, and detail your reasons for the modification as required by Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes. We request that you produce responsive materials in their entirety, including all attachments, appendices, enclosures, and/or exhibits. To the extent that a response to this request would require you to provide multiple copies of identical material, the request is limited so that only one copy of the identical material is requested. If any of the requested records are maintained in a common-format electronic medium, please provide these records in such native electronic medium and not in paper form. For purposes of this request, common electronic formats include (1) American Standard Code for Information Interchange ("ASCII"), (2) files formatted in one of the Microsoft Office Suite, Corel Suite, or OpenOffice Suite (.doc, .xls, .ppt, .mdb, .wpd, etc.), (3) a text file (.txt), or (4) hypertext markup language (.html) or similar web page language. This is the preferred format. However, if any of the requested records are only maintained or only can be produced as electronic images, for example a portable document format (.pdf), (n.b., it is possible to print documents into a PDF format either using Acrobat Professional or a free PDF driver like pdf995.com), then as an alternative, we request this electronic image format. See § 119.01(2), Fla. Stat. Section 119.07(1)(h—i), Florida Statutes, prohibits the destruction of any of the requested records, including any which you may claim are exempt, for a period after the date on which you receive this written request. If we institute a civil action to enforce the Public Records Law with respect to the requested records, you may not dispose of the records except by court order after notice to all affected parties. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. If you have any questions, wish to obtain further information about the nature of the records in which we are interested, or need more information in order to expedite this request, please do not hesitate to contact me ON • 3 TOWN OF GULF STREAM PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Delivered via e-mail April 26, 2019 [Mail to: copwatcher@yahoo.com] Re: GS #2707 (Cell Site Simulators) I am writing on behalf of COPWATCH to seek records regarding use of cell site simulators by the POLICE AND SHERIFFS. Cell site simulators, also called IMSI catchers (in reference to the unique identifier—or international mobile subscriber identity—of wireless devices), impersonate a wireless service provider’s cell tower, prompting cell phones and other wireless devices to communicate with them. These devices are often called “Stingrays,” after the leading model produced by the Melbourne, Florida-based Harris Corporation. 1 Cell site simulators are commonly used in two ways: to collect unique numeric identifiers associated with phones in a given location, or to ascertain the location of a phone when the officers know the numbers associated with it but don’t know precisely where it is. Both of these uses raise privacy concerns. Collecting unique identifiers of all phones in a particular location inherently collects location data on many innocent people. And using a cell site simulator to ascertain the location of a specific cell phone can reveal that it is in a constitutionally protected place, such as a home, that has traditionally been immune from search unless law enforcement agents obtain a warrant based on probable cause. Press reports and court opinions have revealed that Florida law enforcement agencies use cell site simulators in criminal investigations. 2 For example, the Miami-Dade Police Department purchased a cell site simulator as early as 2006, and the Tallahassee Police Department has been using cell site simulators provided to it on loan by an unnamed company—likely Harris Corporation—since at least 2008. 3 The Florida Department of Law Enforcement has “spent more than $3 million buying a fleet of Stingrays” that it makes available to local police departments in the state. 4 Despite widespread public interest in the use and abuse of cell site simulators, the public lacks information about the PLLICE AND SHERIFFS policies and practices. Information is needed so the public can determine whether the POLICE AND SHERIFF use of cell site simulators complies with the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and with Florida law. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST In light of the foregoing and pursuant to the Florida Public Records Law, Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and Article 1, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution, COPWATCH hereby requests records relating to POLICE AND SHERIFFS use of cell site simulators 5 as detailed below: 1. Records regarding POLICE AND SHERIFFs acquisition of cell site simulators, including invoices, purchase orders, contracts, loan agreements, solicitation letters, correspondence with companies providing the devices, and similar documents. In furtherance of this request, please produce records of all contracts, agreements, and communications with Harris Corporation. 2. Records regarding any offer, arrangement, or agreement with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (“FDLE”), Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), or any corporation to borrow or use cell site simulators owned or possessed by the FDLE, FBI, or corporation. 3. All nondisclosure agreements with Harris Corporation, Boeing Corporation (DRT), other companies, and any state or federal agencies regarding the POLICE AND SHERIFF possession and use of cell site simulators. 4. Records regarding policies and guidelines governing use of cell site simulators, including restrictions on when, where, how, and against whom they may be used, limitations on retention and use of collected data, guidance on when a warrant or other legal process must be obtained, and rules governing when the existence and use of cell site simulators may be revealed to the public, criminal defendants, or judges. 5. Records regarding any communications or agreements with wireless service providers (including AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, Sprint Nextel, and U.S. Cellular) concerning use of cell site simulators. 6. Records regarding any communications, licenses, waivers, or agreements with the Federal Communications Commission or Florida Public Service Commission concerning use of cell site simulators. 7. Records reflecting the number of investigations in which cell site simulators have been used, and the number of those investigations that have resulted in prosecutions. 8. Records reflecting a list of all criminal cases, with docket numbers if available, in which law enforcement officers used a cell site simulator as part of the underlying investigation. 9. All applications submitted to state or federal courts for search warrants or orders authorizing use of cell site simulators in criminal investigations, as well as any warrants or orders, denials of warrants or orders, and returns of warrants associated with those applications. If any responsive records are sealed, please provide the date and docket number for each sealed document. 10. All records regarding the use of cell site simulators in closed investigations. We welcome the opportunity to answer any questions you might have about this request in order to better facilitate the production of the public records. INFORMATION ABOUT THE REQUEST As required by law, please acknowledge that you have received this public records request and provide an estimated timeframe in which you believe that you will be able to produce the requested records. See § 119.07(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (“A custodian of public records and his or her designee must acknowledge requests to inspect or copy records promptly and respond to such requests in good faith.”).COPWATCH is a non-profit organization and the disclosure of the requested records will “promote public awareness and knowledge of governmental actions in order to ensure that governmental officials and agencies remain accountable to the people.” Forsberg v. Hous. Auth. of City of Miami Beach, 455 So. 2d 373, 378 (Fla. 1984) (Overton, J., concurring in result). Therefore, we request that you produce the requested records free of charge. However, if you are unable to do so, COPWATCH PLEASE LET US KNOW reasonable costs associated with fulfilling this request, if your office has a policy of requiring the payment of a copying charge for such records. The fees and costs you may charge are governed by Section 119.07(4), Florida Statutes. please contact me with an estimate of the likely cost before proceeding. If you are unable or refuse to provide part or all of the requested public records, please explain in writing and with particularity the reasons for not providing the requested public information in its entirety, as required by Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes. If any exemption that you assert applies to only a portion of the records (as opposed to the entire record), please redact the portion you claim is exempt, provide copies of the remainder of the record or records, and detail your reasons for the modification as required by Section 119.07(1), Florida Statutes. We request that you produce responsive materials in their entirety, including all attachments, appendices, enclosures, and/or exhibits. To the extent that a response to this request would require you to provide multiple copies of identical material, the request is limited so that only one copy of the identical material is requested. If any of the requested records are maintained in a common-format electronic medium, please provide these records in such native electronic medium and not in paper form. For purposes of this request, common electronic formats include (1) American Standard Code for Information Interchange ("ASCII"), (2) files formatted in one of the Microsoft Office Suite, Corel Suite, or OpenOffice Suite (.doc, .xls, .ppt, .mdb, .wpd, etc.), (3) a text file (.txt), or (4) hypertext markup language (.html) or similar web page language. This is the preferred format. However, if any of the requested records are only maintained or only can be produced as electronic images, for example a portable document format (.pdf), (n.b., it is possible to print documents into a PDF format either using Acrobat Professional or a free PDF driver like pdf995.com), then as an alternative, we request this electronic image format. See § 119.01(2), Fla. Stat. Section 119.07(1)(h—i), Florida Statutes, prohibits the destruction of any of the requested records, including any which you may claim are exempt, for a period after the date on which you receive this written request. If we institute a civil action to enforce the Public Records Law with respect to the requested records, you may not dispose of the records except by court order after notice to all affected parties. To Whom It May Concern [Mail to: copwatcher@yahoo.com]: The Town of Gulf Stream has received your public records request dated April 23, 2019. The original public records request can be found at the following link: http://www2.gulf-stream.org/weblink/0/doc/123662/Page1.aspx Please be advised that the Town of Gulf Stream and its Police Department does not own, borrow or use cell site simulators. Therefore, there are no records responsive to your request. We consider this request closed. Sincerely, Reneé Rowan Basel As requested by Rita Taylor Town Clerk, Custodian of the Records