Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutTBP 2021-08-18 '17 0 1, 0 IR A Wr Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday August 18, 2021 6:00 PM- 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnl7d-kkOi 1 cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Information https://us02web.zoom.us/i/2590408013 Meeting ID:259 040 8013 Phone 1 -346-248-7799 1. 6:00 Ire. Roll Call 2. Approval Of Agenda 3. Consent Agenda a. Minutes August 4, 2021 Documents: &gn on ``,�heet Aa,lglt,i, t4, 20�',"?l Pdf 4. Executive Session For a conference with the Town Attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b) and For the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e). Regarding Litigation 5. Discussion And Possible Action Regarding a. Xcel Energy Update b. Project N Update Documents: rase� \A/W flF" 1R(..'qx')N No Appeir :fix pcfif c. Resolution 2021-08-02 Adopting Water Master Plan Documents: Fl,a::.usdufioin 2()21 08 (.)2A,dcJptJng WaMer Su,,qpplyMast(..'^uFlIan.pdf WaM(..'^uMast(.uFlIan I echnk:,al IBoard Mernicil J"Icif MCI) I cjwir� Of V\Wer 1::,, d. Moltz Settlement Documents: 1,10F, %";dUz seiftk..'�meirfll' Affi(JaVOLpdf e. Historic Church Remodel Update 6. Open Forum a) Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on the agenda please contact the Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh at 970-726-5491 ext. 201) 7. Updates a. NWTPR Project Priority b. Committee Minutes Documents: 18 ....... ....... c. Financials Documents: M.n::: 4; 3 MW/Ma ,,v ,"?(.)21 Fk)andall 8. Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Board Staff Lead: Future focused planning Direct: Define the service, product or value to be delivered Protect: Establish the operational Manacle: Now focused policy and procedural boundaries to be respected by Staff and guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on monitored by the Board target service delivery Enable:Advocacy, resource development, Accomplish: Ensure the work defined by the and role discipline direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES DATE: August 4, 2021 MEETING: Board of Trustees Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room and Virtually PRESENT Board: Mayor Philip Vandernail; Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Andy Miller, Brian Cerkvenik, Parnell Quinn and Kaydee Fisher Staff: Town Manager, Ed Cannon; Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh; Marketing and Economic Development Manager, Sarah Wieck; Assistant Town Manager, Michael Brack; Public Works Director, Russell Pennington; Town Planner, Catherine Trotter; Police Chief, Glen Trainor Others: See attached list Mayor Vandernail called the meeting to order at p.m. 1. Rollcall: Mayor Philip Vandernail; Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Andy Miller, Brian Cerkvenik, Parnell Quinn and Kaydee Fisher 2. Approval of Agenda: Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Fisher seconded the motion to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 6-0. 3. Consent Agenda: a) Minutes July 21, 2021 Trustee Waldow moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda. Motion carried: 6-0. 4. Executive Session: For a conference with the Town Attorney for the purpose of receiving legal advice on specific legal questions under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(b) and For the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6- 402(4)(e). Regarding Conservation Easement. Including Town Attorney Rod McGowan, Attorney Kent Whitmer, Town Manager Ed Cannon, Town Clerk Antoinette McVeigh, Assistant Town Manager Michael Brack, Public Works Director Russell Pennington, Town Planner, Catherine Trotter Trustee Cerkvenik moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to open the Executive Session. Motion carried: 6-0. Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to close the Executive Session. Motion carried: 6-0. Page 2 of 3 Attorney's Opinion Required by C.R.S. 24-6-402(2)(d.5)(11)(B). As the attorney representing the Town of Fraser, I am of the opinion that the entire executive session, which was not recorded, constituted a privileged attorney-client communication. Rod McGowan, Town Attorney 5. Executive Session: For the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations, and/or instructing negotiators, under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(e). To discuss the purchase, acquisition, lease, transfer, or sale of real, personal, or other property interest under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(a) Regarding Property Acquisition Including Town Attorney Rod McGowan, Attorney Kent Whitmer, Town Manager Ed Cannon, Town Clerk Antoinette McVeigh, Assistant Town Manager Michael Brack Trustee Cerkvenik moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to open the Executive Session. Motion carried: 6-0. Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to close the Executive Session. Motion carried: 6-0. 6. Executive Session: For discussion of a personnel matter under C.R.S. Section 24-6-402(4)(f)(1) and not involving any specific employees who have requested discussion of the matter in open session. Town Manager Performance. Including Town Manager Ed Cannon, Town Attorney Rod McGowan and Attorney Kent Whitmer Trustee Cerkvenik moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to open the Executive Session. Motion carried: 6-0. Trustee Cerkvenik moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to close the Executive Session. Motion carried: 6-0. 7. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding: a) Open for Business/American Rescue Act The American Rescue Act allows for local business to apply for Grants through DOLA, Open for Business. The requested money must meet specific criteria of the program. This requires 20% of the requested funds to be paid for by the business. The Board agreed that the business will pay 10% and the Town will match the other 10%. The Town will use the money received through the American Rescue Act for the matching funds. b) Livestock No Action was taken and the discussion will be brought back to future meeting. c.i.) Remote Meeting Participation Policy by Town Public Bodies Page 3 of 3 No Action taken. The staff will look into remote participation of the public body for a quasi-judicial hearing and removal of a Board or Commissioner. c.ii.) Remote Meeting Participation Policy by The Public No Action Taken. d) Resolution 2021-08-01 Letter of Agreement for Legal Services, Whitmer Law Firm, LLC Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to approve Motion carried: 6-0. 8. Open Forum: a) Clark Lipscomb spoke b) TM Cannon updated Board on Xcel Energy. Xcel wants to put a pressure tank in the Town behind Safeway. The Board would like to explore another location and know the decibel levels. 9. Updates a) ATM Brack Broadband. Mountain Parks Electric is installing the middle mile fiber optic installation between Winter Park and Hot Sulphur Springs. They will install a "meet me room" which will hold the equipment, it is proposed at the Middle Park facility in Fraser. DOLA will provide a 50% match for the "meet me room" and may request the match from Winter Park and Fraser, approximately a $50,000 match. b) TC McVeigh, CML policy committee member will remain as Eileen Waldow. The Zoppe Italian Circus will be in Fraser for the Labor Day weekend. 10. Adjourn: Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:28 p.m. Antoinette McVeigh, Town Clerk " "3t o 0 ow o 0 0. CL o o " E mm m q8 " 2 " Q) . " "p 8 W " �w2 0 . 0 l g15 U8 " ._................_......_ iz " CL CL= w t/! '°" " " � ' a0 W " " 6 m 0 fl8 M 0 " 0 0 l 0 sw �l iiZoq7 2 aLU " C3. (fie 0 N " 'j " gay0 16 � 0 m 0 0 2 CL16W 0 ca UJ wu- Esd 4) CL 0 "Cx 0 I « " C " 0 U) r0 — 0 0 " o " M4�� V " C W W o "E " u) > " = p17 � " 4) F° " " " = Qffi " a� ,. tlk Q90 m E m - 9 0 0 o I- WWTF DENITRIFICATION CONCEPT REPORT FOR TOWN OF FRASER AND NORTHERN WATER Prepared by: ❑®❑ ❑00 2480 West 26th Ave Building B #225 DENVER, COLORADO 80211 AUG 2021 65420856 Fraser WWTF Denitrification Concept Report CONTENTS Background...................................................................................................................................................1 Sampling Results and Analysis......................................................................................................................1 ModelCalibration .........................................................................................................................................1 ModelValidation...........................................................................................................................................3 Denitrification Modeling Scenarios...............................................................................................................4 Denitrification Conceptual Design..............................................................................................................11 CapitalCost Estimates.................................................................................................................................13 OperationalCost Estimates.........................................................................................................................15 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................16 Appendices Appendix A—Supplementary Sampling Campaign Spreadsheet Appendix B—Biowin Model Reports Appendix C—Opinion of Probable Capital Cost, Black&Veatch Drawings 1. Process Flow Diagram 2. Hydraulic Profile 3. Site Plan ❑u '❑ MERRICKi ❑❑❑ BACKGROUND The existing Upper Fraser Valley Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) discharges to the Fraser River. The existing WWTF is designed for the biological removal of organics, ammonia (via the nitrification process) and limited nitrogen; before the effluent is disinfected and discharged. Last year (2020) Fraser, commissioned a new tertiary treatment plant for metals removal (i.e., zinc and copper) for the WWTF. However, the current WWTF is not designed for maximum nitrogen removal. Modifications to the secondary treatment process will support biological nitrogen removal. Biological nitrogen removal is achieved through a two-part nitrification-denitrification process. By adding additional denitrification capabilities to the existing WWTF, organic and inorganics forms of nitrogen convert to nitrogen gas (N2) and reduce the effluent's total nitrogen concentration.The existing WWTF does not have a effluent total nitrogen limits in its permit. However,the reduced nitrogen loading to the Fraser River can help Northern Water achieve its overall nutrient removal goals for the watershed. Merrick has prepared a conceptual design for modifying the existing wastewater treatment process to incorporate denitrification with support from the Upper Fraser Valley WWTF, Northern Water, and its engineer (Black and Veatch). The basis of the conceptual design is the process model (Biowin by Envirosim). The current WWTF model was calibrated using data from an intensive sampling campaign (March/April 2021),then validated using five years of historical data (April 2015-May 2019).The validated model was used to predict the WWTF response to modifications, with scenarios developed for all four seasons. This report presents the recommended denitrification modifications along with capital and operational cost estimates. SAMPLING RESULTS AND ANALYSIS A 10-day sampling campaign was set up at the Fraser WWTF from March 29 through April 8, 2021. Operators collected samples from the influent and secondary effluent collection points as 24-hour composite samples. Additionally, operators collected daily grab samples from the returned activated sludge(RAS), mixed liquor return (MLR),and aerobic digester dewatering centrate. SGS Laboratory tested the samples for total and volatile suspended solids content (TSS and VSS); biological and chemical oxygen demand (BOD5 and COD);total phosphorus(TP); nitrogen species (TKN, NH3-N, NO3-N, and NO2-N); and alkalinity. Filtered samples were also tested for some parameters, as indicated on the "Supplementary Sampling Spreadsheet" (Appendix A). During the sampling campaign,the Operators recorded temperature and pH readings.They also provided flow rates for the influent, waste-activated sludge (WAS), RAS, MLR, and centrate streams. Operators verified the dissolved oxygen (DO) setpoints for the aeration basins and recorded temperature readings inside the aeration basin, as measured by the DO probe. MODEL CALIBRATION The existing unit process dimensions, historical data,and sampling campaign test results were used to set up and calibrate the model. The sample test results informed influent concentrations, wastewater fractions, and other parameters in the model. Merrick observed that the BOD concentrations dropped steeply at the end of the sampling period, likely due to increased snowmelt inflow and more dilute ❑, ❑ I 1 ❑❑❑ wastewater.The estimated wastewater fractions fit the data better when using only samples from March 29th through April 3rd. However, Merrick observed a high COD to BOD ratio in the sampling data. To improve the model-data fit, operational conditions were verified with staff and updated in the model. Merrick performed a mass balance of the treatment process to aid in this verification. It became apparent that there was some error associated with the wastage rate. (Note: the sludge waste pipe currently does not have a flow meter, so WAS rate is calculated based on pump run times.) The wastage rate was increased in the model, which resulted in a better fit with observed mixed liquor concentrations and effluent solids concentrations. Operators confirmed DO setpoints for the aerated and reaeration basins. The influent dissolved oxygen concentration was adjusted to 2 mg/L since the aerated grit chamber is upstream of the anoxic basin. With oxygen modeling turned on,the modeled DO concentration in the anoxic basin was 0.02 mg/L. Operators also provided information on the local temperature of the aeration basins. During the winter months,wastewater in the basins can be several degrees warmer than the influent. In particular,the black floating covers over the aerated portions of the basin heat up during the day. Based on DO probe data, temperatures in the basin range from 9 to 11 degrees Celsius, when influent is only about 8 degrees. In the model, Merrick adjusted the local temperatures in the aerated bioreactors to 10.5 degrees and the anoxic bioreactor to 9.5 degrees. This change resulted in modeled nitrification rates that were more consistent with the sampling campaign data. All adjustments made were in conjunction with discussion with operational staff and the Black and Veatch team. After working through these adjustments, the model results fit the observed data during the sampling period well, including effluent concentrations and mixed liquor concentrations.Table 1 presents the Effluent model results: Table 1: Effluent Model Results, High COD Calibration ParametersLcanc, m L .1­11ess rete 'Qi �V h4' Mi s V Alkalinity 1.99 5.35 mmol.1 and kmcsl� ......... BOD -Filtered C... 0.36 5.11 BOD-Total Car... 1.38 3.21 CLOD Filtered 22.13 1,31,.33 COD Particulate 7.70 45.70 CLOD Total 29.82 177.09 CLOD Volatile f... 0.00 0.00 Influent inorgan... 0.71 4.21 ISS cellular 0.12 0.70 ISS precipitate 0 0 ISS Total 0.33 4.91 N-Ammonia 0.69 4.07 N Filtered TKN 1,.9.7 11,..73 N Nitrate 7.03 °41..72 N Nitrite +Nitr... .7.4.7 44.38 N Particulate T... 0.2,1 1.25 N -Total inorga... 8.16 48.45 N -Total Kjelda... 2.19 12.97 N -Total N 9.66 57.35 P -Phosphoi°us i... 0 0 P -Soluble PO 4-P 3.21 19.04 P Total P 3.2,5 19.2,2' pH 6..76 S -Total S 0 0 Total aluminium ... 0 0 Total Calcium Dia... 80.32, 4.76.92 Total iron Call fo... 0 0 Total Magnesiu... 14.86 38.24 Total suspende... 6.03 35.30 Volatile suspend... 5.20 30.89 ❑' ❑ I 2 ❑❑❑ MODEL VALIDATION Next,the model was validated with the historical process data between 2015 and 2019.The data included some influent COD measurements from 2015. When comparing the COD:BOD ratios from the historical data and the sampling campaign,the sampling campaign appears to have abnormally high COD.The ratios were atypical for a mostly domestic wastewater treatment facility. (The elevated COD may be related to industrial wastes entering the system,e.g., brewery or distillery waste streams.) Furthermore,the influent characteristics appear to change seasonally,with the spring months typically having higher COD:BOD ratio than in the summer. The biosolids handling data also was not aligning with the calibration based on the sampling data(referred to as High COD calibration) due to the high amount of COD anticipated to be inert based on sampling results.The sampling period also had a historically low BOD:N ratio,while the effluent TIN in the High COD calibration is lower than historically achieved. These anomalies lead to the concern that the calibrated model could be overly optimistic regarding nitrogen removal. Merrick and Black & Veatch staff discussed the model validation. Collectively deciding an alternative approach ("Alternative Calibration") to address the discrepancies between the sampling and historical data and responses in the model. To varying degrees throughout the year, there may be BOD inhibition, which would help explain the high COD:BOD ratio. Applying a correction factor to the measure BOD (considered to be inhibited) and using a more typical COD:BOD ratio of 2.3 provided a better fit for both the sampling and historical data. Inhibited to actual BOD ratios are summarized below: During the sampling campaign, inhibited: actual =0.51. In spring, inhibited: actual = 0.66. In summer, inhibited: actual =0.92. A corrected BOD and COD:BOD ratio of 2.3 calculated the influent COD concentration. Similarly, the TSS measurement and sampling period ISS:TSS ratio of 0.12 calculated the inert suspended solids (ISS) concentration.To address the influent nitrogen,the ratio between the measured TKN and calculated COD during the sampling campaign was determined to be 14.5. The ratio of NHx:TKN varies throughout the year but was abnormally high during the sampling campaign. Using the calculated TKN and historical ammonia measurements, Merrick determined the spring and summer months fraction of ammonia nitrogen (fna). Other wastewater fractions were also updated to match both data sets.The fraction of unbiodegradable particulate(fup)was adjusted up slightly from the default value. Meanwhile, Merrick adjusted the fraction of readily biodegradable substrate (fbs) and acetate (fac) values down. At the same time, the fraction of non-colloidal slowly biodegradable substrate (fxsp) was increased slightly. ❑ ❑ I 3 ❑❑❑ Table 2 presents the Effluent model results for the Alternative Calibration: Table 2: Effluent Model Results,Alternative Calibration p.....i.........ters........ . .....Colryc' �m � Mass nate ��..,,.........,..t U.............................:.......... .. ....,II...................................:.. ..,..,.........r,, ...............W...,,..............,,...�...... Alkaes linity 2.10 5.65 mmol1 and kmolid BOD-Filtered C... 1.00 5.91 BOD-Total Car... 2.17 12..36 COD-Filtered 26.47 157.20 COD-Particulate 6.26 37.19 COD-Total 32„74 194.39 COD-Volatile f... 0.00 0.01 Influent,inorgan... 0,35 5.05 ISS cellular 0.26 1..55 ISS precipitate 0 0 ISS Total 1.11 6.60 N-Ammonia 0.45 2.69 N-Filtered TKN 2..75 16.32 N-Nitrate 5.42 32.21 N-Nitrite+Nitr... 5.63 33.75 N-Particulate T... 0.23 1.69 N-Total inorga... 6.14 36.44 N-Total Kjelda... 3.03 13.01 N-Total N 3.72 51.75 P-Phosphorus i... 0 0 P-Soluble PO4-P 2..03 1,2..03 P-Total P 2.12 12.59 pH 6.77 S-Total S 0.00 0.00 Total aluminium ... 0 0 Total Calcium (a... 80.97 480.77 Total iron Call fo... 0 0 Total Magnesiu,,, 14,73 37.75 Total suspende... 5.71 33.39 Volatile suspend... 4.60 2.7.29 For proposed denitrification modifications, the Alternative Calibration is the basis of modeling. Realizing that the sampling period data is specific to the season, it may be advisable to run another sampling campaign in the summer and re-validate the model.Then,verify the concept design seasonally as well. DENITRIFICATION MODELING SCENARIOS Merrick created two main scenarios from the Alternative Calibration: one representing spring conditions and one for summer conditions. The average influent and operational parameters from the 2015-2019 historical data set were input into the model.The basis of the spring scenario is the collected and historic April and May data, whereas the basis of the summer scenario is the historic July and August data. The team considered June a transitional month; corresponding performance and operational costs are considered an average of the spring and summer scenarios. Spring Scenario:The influent tends to be more diluted and colder due to melting snow infiltrating the sanitary sewer collection system. Although the black floating covers may provide additional heat during the daytime, Merrick did not use recorded local temperatures in the basins to design conservatively. The design flow (i.e., 1.0 MGD) was input into the model to determine the necessary basin volumes. Merrick used an iterative process based on the results of the Summer Scenario as well. Longer solids ❑ ❑ 4 retention times (SRT) tend to generate filamentous or hard-to-settle sludge; the WWTF already experiences "fluffy' sludge with low solids concentrations. For that reason, a 25-day SRT was set, which the model found iteratively by adjusting the sludge wastage rate. For both scenarios, Merrick used a 2x MLR rate to influent flow rate. The following table summarizes the inputs to the model. Table 3: Spring Scenario Model Inputs Spring Scenario-Average Input Parameter Value lNotes Flow(MGD) 1.113 Historical average Flow pertrain(MGD) 0.557 Assumes even split btwn 2 trains Design flow pertrain(MGD) 1.000 Calcaluated from spring correction COD(mg/L) 310.15 factor 0.66 and COD:BOD ratio of 2.3 Calculated ratio of calculated COD based TKN(mg/L) 21.24 on sampling TP(mg/L) 4.85 From sampling campaign S(mg/L) 0.00 No data Nitrate(mgN/L) 0.102 From sampling campaign pH 7.082 Historical average Alkalinity(mmol/L) 4.04 From sampling campaign Calculated from ISS:TSSfrom sampling ISS Total (mg/L) 14.90 campaign Calcium(mg/L) 80.00 default Magnesium(mg/L) 15.00 default Temperature(°C) 6.6 Historical average WW Fractions Fbs 0.050 Fac 0.050 Fxsp 0.680 Fus 0.050 default F u p 0.200 Fcel 0.000 Fna 0.329 33%NHx:TKN for spring 2015 Fnox 0.500 default Fnus 0.050 FupN 0.020 Fpo4 0.500 default FupP 0.005 Stoichiometric Part.Substrate COD:VSS 1.6327 default Part.Inert COD:VSS 1.300 Operational Clarifier Underflow Rate 70.77% of Influent flow Wastage Rate 1.30% of Influent flow MLR Rate I 200% of Influent flow Basin temperatures equal liquid temperature for lack of data. ❑ ❑ I 5 ❑❑❑ The model predicted that the MLSS concentration was 2495 mg/L at the design flow, slightly lower than the average concentration during spring months(i.e.,about 2800 mg/L).The calculated wastage rate was 16,900 gpd with a solids concentration of 5931 mg/L, representing an approximately 20% increase in sludge production from the existing process.The model predicts good nitrification and denitrification are achieved, with effluent concentrations of TN at 4.44 mg/L, ammonia-nitrogen at 0.81 mg/L, and TIN at 2.41 mg/L. The following table summarizes the predicted effluent concentrations and mass rates. Appendix B includes a complete Biowin model report for this scenario. Table 4:Spring Scenario-Predicted Effluent Concentrations and Mass Rates Parameters s c i7 ,.'. ... f l ,,,.rate .,,..� ��, ,,...Notes... Alkalinity 3.47 1.2..93 mmolrl and kmolld BOD-Filtered C... 0.9=4 7.'7'5 BOD -Total Car... 2.42 19.86 COD-Filtered 16,94 139,81 COD -Particulate 9.05 74.23 COD -Total 25.99 2..1.3.25 COD-Volatile f... 9,91 0.06 II'lfluent',inorgan... 1..02. 8.38 ISS cellular 0.36 2.96 ISS precipitate 0 0 ISS Total 1.38 11.34 N -Ammonia 9,81 6.68 N -Filtered TIT 2.45 20.06 N-Nitrate 1.2.1 9.93 N -Nitrite -F Nitr... 1.59 13.05 N -Particulate T .. 0.40 3.30 N -Total inorga... 2.41 19.74 N-Total Kaelda... 2.85 23.36 N -Total N 4.44 36.41 P-Phosphorus i... 0 0 P-Soluble PO4-P 3.2,3 26.47 P -Total P 3.35 27.46 pH 6.98 S_Total S 0.00 0.00 Total aluminium ... 0 0 Total Calcium [a... 80.63 661„51. Total iron (all fb... 0 0 Total Magnesiu... 14.89 1.2.2..18 Total suspende... 8.04 65.99 Volatile suspend... 6.66 54.65 The model predicted excellent denitrification performance in the anoxic basin with less efficient nitrogen removal in the post-anoxic. While external carbon addition would improve denitrification rates in the post-anoxic basin, good nitrogen removal was achieved without carbon addition.Operational costs could be saved by operating the post-anoxic basin without carbon addition (or at a lower feed rate) during the spring months. Figure 1 illustrates the predicted nitrogen concentrations(without carbon addition)across the activated sludge treatment basin. ❑, ❑ I 6 ❑❑❑ Ammonia Conc. in Bioreactors 4 3.8 3.1 J - - - 2.9 Z 3 -------- --------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E 2.5 - - - 1.9 - - U2 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ - Z 15 ------------- 1.0 1.1 0.9 --------------- O U 1- 0.5- 0 0.5 0 Anoxic New Anoxic New Aeration Aeration Aeration 2 Post-Anoxic Polishing Reaeration IN N-Ammonia NOX Conc. in Bioreactors 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- J 1.4 Z 1.5 ------------------------------------------------ 1.2 ------------------------ E 1.0 1.0 I — --- --- Z 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 O U 0.5 0.2 --- -------------- 0.3 ------------------ -------------- --- -------- --------- 0.0 0.1 0.1 0 Anoxic New Anoxic New Aeration Aeration Aeration Post-Anoxic Polishing Reaeration N-Nitrite iI N-Nitrate Figure 1: Spring Scenario—Nitrogen Species in Activated Sludge Treatment Bioreactors Actual performance could be improved by increasing basin temperature. Elimination of inflow and infiltration in the sewer system (currently underway) should improve influent temperatures. Installing permanent basin covers could also improve nitrification performance and protect the biology from large temperature swings, particularly during spring months. Summer Scenario:The influent nutrient and BOD loading increases as the influent becomes less diluted. Influent wastewater temperature also increases,so there is no disparity between influent and basin liquid temperatures.The following table summarizes the inputs to the model. ❑, ❑ I ❑❑❑ Table 5: Summer Scenario Model Inputs Summer Scenario-Average Input Parameter Value I Notes Flow(MGD) 0.652 Historical average Flow pertrain(MGD) 0.326 Assumes even split btwn 2 trains Design flow per train (MGD) 0.600 Proportional based on time of year Calcaluated from spring correction factor 0.66 COD(mg/L) 548.551 and COD:BOD ratio of 2.3 Calculated ratio of calculated COD based on TKN (mg/L) 37.57 sampling TP(mg/L) 6.50 default S(mg/L) 0.00 No data Nitrate(mgN/L) 0.102 From sampling campaign pH 7.59 Historical average Alkalinity(mmol/L) 6.00 default Calculated from ISS:TSS from sampling ISS Total (mg/L) 29.88 campaign Calcium(mg/L) 80.00 default Magnesium(mg/L) 15.00 default Temperature(°C) 14.0 Historical average WW Fractions Fbs 0.05 Fac 0.05 Fxsp 0.68 Fus 0.05 default Fu p 0.20 Fcel 0.00 Fna 0.54 46%N Hx:TKN for spring 2015 Fnox 0.50 default Fn u s 0.05 Fu p N 0.02 Fpo4 0.50 default FupP 0.005 Stoichiometric Part.Substrate COD:VSS 1.6327 default Part. Inert COD:VSS 1.30 Operational Clarifier Underflow Rate 95.12% of Influentflow Wastage Rate 2.30% of Influentflow MLR Rate I 200% of Influentflow Basin temperatures equal liquid temperature for lack of data. The design flow was input into the model to determine the necessary basin volumes. Like in the Spring Scenario, the SRT was set to 25 days, controlled by the sludge wastage rate. The MLR rate was reduced from 3-times influent flow to 2-times influent flow while still achieving TN less than 5 mg/L. ❑w 13 8 ❑❑❑ At the design flow,the model predicted that the MLSS concentration would be about 2875 mg/L, less than the average summer value (i.e., 3800 mg/L). The calculated wastage rate was 16,650 gpd at a solids concentration of 5780 mg/L, representing an approximately 20% increase in sludge production from the existing process.The model predicted excellent nitrification and denitrification are achieved,with effluent concentrations of TN at 4.53 mg/L, ammonia-nitrogen at 0.12 mg/L, and TIN at 1.92 mg/L.The following table summarizes the predicted effluent concentrations and mass rates. Appendix B includes a complete Biowin model report for this scenario. Table 6:Summer Scenario-Predicted Effluent Concentrations and Mass Rates Para s ail '..... ....................... I ss.,l, .„ ,... Notes... Alkalinity 4.43 9,74 mmol/l and kmoljd BOD-Filtered C... 0.36 4.16 BOD-Total Car... 1.62 7.84 COD-Filtered 23.76 139,40 COD -Particulate 5.04 24,43 COD-Total 33,39 163.33 COD-Volatile f... 0.01 0.03 Influent inorgan... 0.66 3.19 IS'S cellular 0.20 0.97 ISS precipitate B 0 ISS Total 0.36 4.16 N -Ammonia 0.12 0.57' N -Filtered TKN 2.51 12,16 N -Nitrate 1.77 3.53 N -Nitrite +Nitr... 1.30 3.74 N -Particulate T .. 0.22 1,03 N-Total inorga... 1,92 9.30 N -Total Kaelda... 2.73 13.24 N -Total N 4.53 21.97 P-Phosphorus i... 0 0 P -Soluble PO4-P 3.66 17.75 P-Total P 3.73 13.0'7' pH 7.10 S-Total S 0.00 0.00 Total aluminium ... 0 0 Total Calcium [a... 31.04 392.32 Total iron (all fo... 0 0 Total Magnesiu... 14.73 71.65 Total suspende... 4.57 22.16 Volatile suspend... 3,71 13.00 The model predicts excellent denitrification performance in the anoxic basin with less efficient nitrogen removal in the post-anoxic. External carbon addition to the post-anoxic basin was set to 83 pounds readily degradable COD per day to achieve effluent TN value less than 5 mg/L. Figure 2 illustrates the predicted nitrogen concentrations across the activated sludge treatment process. ❑u '❑ 9 Ammonia Conc. in B|oreactors 6.6/ s � 5 4.1 * zs a g U o 1 0Li 1 16 a 11111Z I'll, xoovw New Anoxic New Aeration x^moon Aeration Post-Anoxic po/wmno nwmmnon PJOX Conc. in BioKeactors s � �� ^ 3.0 a u Z o � U 1 Anoxic wawxouxic New Aeration x^mmun Aeration Post-Anoxic pulisxmu nouaomon Figure 2: Summer Scenario-Nitrogen Species in Activated Sludge Treatment in Bioreactors The spring and summer scenarios initially targeted an effluent TN concentration of 5 mg/L. By supplying additional carbon tuthe post-anoxic basin, denitrification performance can be further improved. The tertiary system will likely also remove some organic nitrogen, but it was not quantified in the model. Tab|e7 summarizes carbon addition effects on secondary clarifier effluent concentrations; italicized rows indicate an effluent TN of m0/Lorless Table 7: Carbon Addition Comparison Scenario Effluent Concentration Operations Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent Effluent Carbon Carbon TSS BOD TN TIN NH4-N Addition* Addition* Total OTR Proposed Summer 4.56 1.58 5.811 3.19 0.19 0 01 74.0 Proposed Summer 4.58 1.62 4.51 1.92 0.12 500 83 75.6 Proposed Summer 4.58 1.64 4.01 1.40 0.10 700 117 76.9 Proposed Summer 4.59 1.67 3.35 0.74 0.07 1000 167 77.2 Proposed Summer 4.61 3.20 2.60 0.01 0.01 1700, 284 79.4 Proposed Spring 8.05 2.43 4.43, 2.40 0.83 0 0 66.6 Proposed Spring 8.07 2.46 3.95 1.93 0.77 300 50 6Z5 Proposed Spring 8.09 2.49 3.26 1.25 0.66 750 125 69.1 Proposed Spring 8.15 2.61 2.69 0.70 0.501 1500 250 71.7 Proposed Spring 8.28 2.97 2.32 0.31 0.25 3000, 500 76.0 Existing Summer 4.70 1.67, 9.29, 6.55 0.131 01 01 77.3 0 LJ' LJ � ERR0CK' 10 DENITRIFICATION CONCEPTUAL DESIGN When exploring the denitrification modifications in the model, we sought to maintain the create operational capacity to ensure that the WWTF will continue to achieve its permitted effluent limits.While Upper Fraser Valley WWTF operators are willing to augment the facility to help Northern Water meet its nutrient goals, they cannot afford to jeopardize the facility's existing performance. Therefore, the following constraints were applied: • Provide the same total aerated volume as the existing treatment train. • Maintain the reaeration basin volume and operational setpoint. • Use existing basin dimensions. Basins can be further divided into zones, but additional volume will need to be added externally, i.e., basin expansion. • Assume influent input calculations and wastewater fractions are the same as the validated model agreed upon calibration approach. Meanwhile, basin size and operation, pump rates, and carbon addition were investigated in the model to promote denitrification. Initially, the following changes were made (per train): • Add 71,600 gallons of pre-anoxic volume to the existing anoxic volume. The resultant pre-anoxic volume is 158,100 gallons, which will be a new basin, achieved by adding 28 feet to the end of each existing train. • Add post-anoxic (53,400 gallons) and polishing zones (23,300 gallons). These zones should be located at the end of the treatment train, ahead of the clarifier. By dividing the existing aeration basin,these zones fit within the existing basin. • Maintain total aerated volume by converting the existing anoxic zone to an aerobic zone. • Maintain the sludge reaeration zone, but route flow into the new pre-anoxic zone, i.e., opposite current flow direction. Effluent from the pre-anoxic zone will be routed through a pipe through the sludge reaeration zone to discharge into the aerobic zone. • Adjust mixed liquor recycle rate to two times the influent flow rate.Two MLR pumps per train are recommended to meet the design flow rate. The MLR piping will need to be relocated from the current location to the end of the modified aerobic zone and extended to discharge to the new pre-anoxic zone. • Adjust RAS based on the historical percentage of the influent flow rate. o Spring: RAS= 69.5%Qin o Summer: RAS= 92.8%Qin • Increase sludge wastage rate to maintain a 25-day SRT in the model. Increased sludge production necessitates an expansion of the existing biosolids handling facilities. • Add carbon source to the post-anoxic basin (modeled as readily degradable COD), as needed. The following table summarizes the existing basin volumes and operational characteristics versus the modified basins in the denitrification model. The total aerated volumes for the existing WWTF and with proposed modifications are also listed. ® ® I 11 ❑❑❑ Table 8: Overview of Existing and Modified Basin Volumes Existing Modified Volume DO Setpoint Volume DO Setpoint Name (gal) (mg/L) Name (gal) (mg/L) New Anoxic 158,124 0 Reaeration 127,356 1.0 Reaeration 127,356 1.0 Anoxic 86,524 0 Aerobic 86,524 2.5 Aerobic 329,857 2.5 Aeration 419,982 2.5 Post-Anoxic 66,740 0 Polishing 23,340 2 Total Aerated Total Aerated Volume 419,982 2.5 Volume 416,381 2.5 Modifications to the existing secondary treatment basins include construction of new volume; adding and removing existing divider walls to convert aeration zones; installation of covers; and piping realignment. New equipment in the secondary treatment basin includes mixed liquor recycle pumps; mixer/aerators, and an air control valve for each zone of aeration;oxidation-reduction potential (ORP)sensors and airflow meters for all zones except the polishing zone; and automation of airflow to the various zones based on ORP measurements. A carbon storage facility is required to store and meter carbon feed to the post-anoxic basin;the location of this facility is yet to be determined, but there are a few areas available near the secondary treatment basins. Increased sludge production makes a third 0.5 MG aerobic digester necessary; however, existing digester blowers and centrifuge have sufficient capacity to support increased sludge production. These modifications are presented in the enclosed process flow diagram, hydraulic profile, and site plan drawings. In addition, the WWTF requires new process and controls equipment and upgrades. The existing motor control center(MCC) and controls for secondary treatment are analog and should be upgraded to digital. RAS and WAS pumps are over 20 years old and nearing the end of their useful life; furthermore, there is no flow meter on the WAS line. It is recommended that equipment upgrades be included as part of the denitrification modifications project; cost-sharing for upgrades can be negotiated later in the Memorandum of Understanding. Finally,the existing sequencing batch reactor(SBR) basin will need to be equipped to support continuous wastewater treatment during the construction of the proposed denitrification modifications. The SBR is designed to treat 0.5 MGD of wastewater per day; with one of the traditional secondary treatment trains kept online (i.e., 1 MGD), the WWTF will maintain treatment capacity for the current flows experienced.The following table summarizes the equipment needs. ® ® I 12 ❑❑❑ Table 9:Additional Equipment Requirements Estimated Capacity Power (each) Quantity (each) Secondary Treatment Pre- and Post-Anoxic Zone Aerator/Mixers 440scfm 6 12.5 hp Reaeration Aerator/Mixers 440scfm 4 12.5 hp Aerobic Zone Aerator/Mixers 600scfm 4 25 hp Air control valves 10 Airflow meters 8 ORP probes 8 Mixed Liquor Pump 1000gpm 4 10 hp WAS pump 125 gpm 2 Shp WAS flow meter 1 RAS pump 1100gpm 3 7.5 hp Carbon storage building Sludge Handling Operations New digester 0.5 MG 1 Aerators/Mixers 1 75 hp Automation& MCC Upgrades SBR Upgrades Aerators/Mixers 440scfm 2 12.5 hp Blower 880scfm 1 100 hp CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES Black and Vetch (B/V)organized and provided the opinion of probable capital costs (OPCC)for the project per the contracted scope of work. B/V is consistent with the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering(AACE)Class 4 Estimate. A class 4 estimate provides an accuracy range from-15%to-30%on the low side and +20% to +50% on the high side. B/V has stated their range of accuracy as -30%/+50%. B/V evaluated the design requirements with related direct costs for labor, permanent and incidental materials, construction equipment, and specialty subcontract costs. The direct costs associated with the ® ® I 13 ❑❑❑ OPCC are adjusted for the project location using recent project bids, RS Means, and US Army Corps of Engineers Unified Facilities Criteria for Area Cost Factors. The OPCC builds costs from direct construction activities and ads markups to represent a complete price for the scope of work depicting the methodology a contractor may use. Further escalation of the costs pertains to contingency and mark conditions. Table 10 highlights the related capital costs. Appendix C provides a complete breakdown of costs. Table 10: Opinion of Probable Construction Costs Secondary/Tertiary Treatment Facility $ 4,289,024 Pre-Anoxic Basins $ 1,185,899 Sludge Reaeration and Anoxic Zones $ 582,393 Aeration Zones $ 466,391 Post-Anoxic Basins $ 376,426 RAS/WAS Pump Replacements $ 417,639 Partial Concrete Deck and Walkway with Floating Covers $ 607,950 Electrical $ 417,116 Instrumentation and Control $ 235,210 New Chemical Storage and Feed Building $ 459,748 Structure $ 250,673 Process Equipment $ 163,434 Electrical, Instrumentation and Control $ 45,641 SBR Basin Upgrades $ 570,026 Process Equipment $ 261,423 Process Piping $ 221,879 Structural Modifications $ 4,500 Electrical, Instrumentation and Control $ 82,224 New Digester $ 899,167 New 0.5 MG Digester $ 732,364 Electrical, Instrumentation and Control $ 166,803 Site Work $ 275,000 Sub total 1_6 492,965 Sub-Contractor Markups $ 667,848 Risk Assessment Markups $ 1,790,203 General Requirements $ 1,252,582 Contractor Fee $ 1,313,897 Insurance and Bonds $ 177,192 Total $ 11,694,687 Range-30% $ 8,186,281 Range+50% $ 17,542,031 ® ® I 14 ❑❑❑ OPERATIONAL COST ESTIMATES Additional annual operation and maintenance (O&M) cost estimates were derived from the preliminary equipment list and conversations with operators about estimated O&M person-hour requirements. Operators provided estimates on additional required run times for existing sludge handling equipment to handle the increased sludge production. Mixers and pumps were assumed to operate at 80% of their rated capacity to establish annual power consumption. For equipment replacement (e.g., new mixed liquor recycle pumps), existing equipment power and person-hours were credited so that only additional O&M costs were captured. The total estimated additional annual power consumption with both trains modified and operational is estimated to be an additional 1,660,000 kWh;at$0.09 per kWh,the estimated annual additional power costs $150,000. There are additional person-hours associated with operating and maintain the process equipment, particularly the proposed carbon addition facility,and increased sludge handling operations.Another full- time operator is needed to meet the O&M person-hours requirements added by the process modifications. The Town of Fraser budgets $50,000 to $70,000 for a full-time operator, dependent on experience. Table 11 provides a breakdown of the estimated power and labor demands. Table 11:Additional Power and Manhours for Equipment Rated Power(per Total Additional Annual Power O&M Added Equipment Quantity unit) Est.Power* Consumption Manhours Pre-anoxic basin HP kW kW KWh hours/week Mixer/aerator 4 12.5 9.3 29.8 261,293 1 Existing mixer(credit) 4 4.0 3.0 -9.5 -83,614 -1 Sludge reaeration basin Mixer/aerator 4 12.5 1 9.3 29.8 261,293 1 Existing mixer(credit) 2 6.2 4.6 -7.4 -64,801 -1 Aeration basin Mixer/aerator 4 25.0 18.6 59.7 522,587 1 MLR Pump 4 10.0 7.5 23.9 209,035 2 Existing MLR pump(credit) 4 5.0 3.7 -11.9 -104,517 -1 Pre-anoxic basin Mixer/aerator 2 12.5 9.3 14.9 130,647 1 Sludge Handling Digester mixer/aerator 1 75.0 55.9 44.7 391,940 1 Carbon Addition Carbon feed equipment 1 0.5 0.4 0.3 2,613 12 Building HVAC/maintenance 1 3 2.2 1.8 15,678 1 Airflow meter/automated valve 8 0.25 0.2 1.2 10,452 2 *Assume mixers/MLR pumps run constantly at 80%rated power Rated Power(per Additional Run Annual Power O&M Existing Equipment Quantity unit) Time Consumption Manhours HP kW hours/week KWh hours/week WAS pump 2 5 3.7 8 3102.112 2 Digester blower 2 125 93.2 8 77552.8 2 Centrifuge 1 100 74.6 8 31021.12 8 Total Additional Annual Power O&M Est.Power* Consumption Manhours Annual Total 177.2 1,664,281 31 ❑❑❑ 1:11111111"o 15 EIDE] There are also operational costs associated with the disposal of treated biosolids following sludge handling. Currently, disposal costs about $70,000 per year. An increased sludge production of 20% will result in a proportional disposal cost increase, i.e., $14,000. Finally, there is the cost for the carbon addition. If a target effluent TN concentration is 4 mg/L, about 50 ppd will need to be added during the spring months, while in the summer, the system will require up to 120 ppd. June applied an average dose because it is considered a transitional month. The following table summarizes the carbon addition dose;the annual total is about 13,000 pounds. The current cost of micro C (the preferred carbon chemical) is approximately$0.58/lb. Therefore,the approximate increase in annual operation cost for chemical use is$7,600. Table 12: Carbon Addition for Effluent Total Nitrogen of 4 mg/L Dose (ppd) Days Monthly Total (Ibs) Carbon addition April 50 30 1,500 May 50 31 1,550 June 85 30 2,550 July 120 31 3,720 August 120 31 3,720 Annual Total 13,040 CONCLUSION These process model results suggest that denitrification at the Fraser WWTF is feasible with minimal modifications to the existing facility.With carbon addition,the effluent nitrogen concentrations predicted are reliably below the threshold requested by Northern Water, i.e.,total nitrogen less than 4.0 mg/L.The model does not include tertiary treatment processes, which may further reduce effluent TN concentrations closer to predicted effluent TIN concentrations. An intensive sampling and model calibration and validation have improved confidence in the model results; we recommend additional sampling during this summer to validate the summer modeling scenario. The proposed modifications to achieve denitrification capabilities at the existing WWTF include: • additional basin volume, • existing basin modifications, • installation of new equipment, • carbon addition facility, and • expansion of the sludge handling capacity. The total capital cost estimate for these modifications is $11,622,150. The additional operations and maintenance costs associated with the modifications are$248,000 per year; this includes the addition of one full-time operator to support additional O&M task items running the WWTF, estimated increased power consumption, increased sludge disposal, and cost to purchase additional chemical. ® ® I 16 ❑❑❑ " N - Z U w L- oo o O om LLI - Q L Em Lu �3m + _ - o Clzz w h or w Z = K J LD F j w O W J U Q �L a 13 _ W o W U 1 a I I Z d O 0 a »vosN :ia do - U Iuw J ry 0- I sm CY 2 I U i LLI � I - p _ r - W l S r - ILLv w5 O Q d p Z o IMU W U � D � o Q m❑> - _ ❑ ❑: p p m❑ M1 Tr _ I Z Q Q d3 a = � U) J� a � Z U W LL 0 W cr Z W O ('J u.....n u.....n uxnn auxin auxin u.un wnlp Q— p w o CD z a o W II III CF) Lu z > II III L o J � IIP..........n................................................... rr� a II h II >o II W � II II < a II 0 a II II W II wz I III I a III III I I I III III I I I 1 III II I I II II III I I I III � II III � z I ' III LU III � Q ry a Iii ' Iii a W II a III III r III 0 Q II I'I II LL v O II II w W co LU II II Q 21 II II LU Q II + ...III � m❑�x.. II II rY C � III III LI I II w a III � III r II I�I...n�...n�...n�.....�...n�..��...n �..,..�...n�...n�...n�.....�.....�...n�...n�...n�.....�....III o> 3v I ii III z II LU � CD II � I i III I = -Nn-4pa' TIM NVOOL-619a1 -ld 6nppltl wam—S53—%iUsa—dwl—+pvap:mc:3 WW W9 d,-N�a�dap 53�W�17��a....u'I�lali JM r I I I�I�. Ilil r zz �O II Z W LL Id lil �o j � z r U P ¢ I .p Wgo tY a o H H k ,tri o CD LL, ~ Z ¢ � II I � O H ILLI Z LDJ W O W J „i U¢ I ¢ 'I. I I' LL a W W LU U II a O I N JI I I I I i I I I W III I Ir I - � w I II I I ` I II II I SII I I I I IIS p. I Y II I i I I II � 0 I o I - I I r ,r r II i I J it I II II3 R I I 3� I I � I ��14 I r I ir' II I I I� Ip I 'I I r I,+ I I I I I' I � I I'r f® /i I n I , 1 C I � I , I I �k I. Izaaluro as a�rav�a ails- uwaaraa,'.'I'��re+ x�>,�w.arwolr,a�a�s3ow�i7..�. TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION 2021-08-02 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, The Water Supply Master Plan is primarily intended to provide a picture in time of the current legal and physical water supplies available to the Town of Fraser in its role as a municipal water supplier. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: The Town Board hereby adopts the attached Water Supply Master Plan. DULY MOVED, SECONDED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2021. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: Absent: BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk uuy,�wur a r IMP COILORADO MEMO TO: Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM: Russell Pennington, Public Works Director, and Adam Cwiklin, Water and Wastewater Superintendent DATE: August 16, 2021 SUBJECT: Water Supply Planning MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Water Supply Planning Where does Fraser stand today and what do we need to do? BACKGROUND: Water Supply planning is essential to the long-term viability of any town. Frasers water supply planning efforts began 1954 and continue today. 1954 2008 2020 Definitions: EQR: Generally, One EQR is equal to one single family residence Safe yield: Safe yield or firm yield is defined as the maximum quantity of water which can be guaranteed Note: All projections are based on maximum daily use as defined by the water right. CURRENT STATUS: Summary Table System Current EQR Obligated to Current Safe Legal limit Excess count serve EQRs Yield (gpm) EQRs EQRs North 1040 2275 600 2828 553 South 700 2822 390 2822 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 1. Fraser's North and South System wellfields have the capacity to meet current safe-yield max day demands. The Future Demand to Buildout tables and spreadsheets (see Tables 9 through 12) for the North and South Systems are based on incremental EQR increases. The spreadsheets should be used in the Town's water supply planning to understand the max day water supply requirements of additional EQRs on the Town's water supply. 2. Water supplies for additional development beyond the current demands should be in place before the water is needed. This recommendation may require that water supply development work begin no later than two years before the water may be needed. 3. If Water Court applications are required to obtain new water rights or to change the Town's current water rights, this work should begin no later than three years before the water is needed. 4. The Town should continue to evaluate possible water rights/storage acquisitions that may arise in the future, to provide additional certainty and protection against increasing demands and changing legal and climatological circumstances. 5. The Town should continue incrementally perfecting its conditional water rights through the diligence and Water Court process. The Town should vigilantly protect its legal water supplies by monitoring and prudently participating in Water Court proceedings potentially impacting the Town's water rights. 6. The Town should continue to be an active participant in all existing and future water related agreements with third-parties, and proactively steer its water supply development activities to maximize the benefits of those agreements (e.g., the Clinton Reservoir- Fraser River Water Agreement, the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement). 7. The Town should continue to promote and support water conservation, particularly during the irrigation season. 8. The Town should continue to monitor and record all well pumping and water level data (both static and pumping levels). 9. Regular review of the water well production and water level data will be important to determine when pumping equipment and well maintenance should be performed. Pumping equipment should be removed from wells and inspected at approximately five- year intervals. At this time a video survey of the well should be performed and appropriate well rehabilitation work completed. 10. The onsite water supply potential should be evaluated for any new annexation area. 11. The Town's current augmentation storage is sufficient for its current water supply demand. Additional augmentation storage will be necessary to meet future legal and physical water supply requirements. 12. Accounting for both the North and South Systems should continue to be updated on a monthly basis and the Town should continue to work with Colorado Division of Water Resources staff with respect to water accounting matters. 13. The Town's St. Louis Creek and Elk Creek surface water rights continue to be important components of the Town's future water supplies and planning efforts. Town of Fraser Water Supply Report June 2020 10 „qlu r,ll�pryour°""' ^ou�,Vlllklp„,ll i,,l@pllpu' ild ... ��ItlI01Wo0 Ill�d,��� ... ... u I Illiiilo pu°” `NmhNl ��IV, ..,,,. "u�l�i��IIII v W tllulll�illlll I Ill�l��lll��l����tl �tlNN IIuINI wN ry .,,, 11111ii111111111 uil I r d i Ing �I P VIIppI�Viil'� 1„' ii IIPN WNIWI�1�III����V� � I h"'�;d�Nlh��h a III III TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems ....................... A. Legal Water Supplies for the North Fraser System ................................................ i. Town of Fraser's Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply ...................... (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic WaterSystem ............................................................................. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4 and 5 ................................................... (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 .................................................................... ii. Surface Water Rights .......................................................................... (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension .............................. (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 ................................................................... iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights .................................... (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts ................ (a) Twenty-Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir ................................................................... (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir ......................................... (c) Windy Gap Project Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir ............... (2) Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement ............................... (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement ........................................... iv. Storage— Fraser Reservoir No. 2 ......................................................... v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation ................................................ B. Legal Water Supplies for the South System ............................................ i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan ................................................................ ii. Wells ............................................................................................... (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 ....................................................... (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 ................................................. iii. Surface Water Rights .......................................................................... (1) Cozens Ditch ............................................................................... (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension.......................................... ii. Reservoir/Pond Storage ..................................................................... (1) Mary's Pond ............................................................................... (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights ....................................................... B. Other Water Rights ............................................................................ i. Decreed Exchanges ........................................................................ (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange ............................................... (2) Middle Park Exchange ............................................................... II. Physical Water Supply Demand for the North System ................................... A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System ............................... i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR .................... ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs ................................................... iii. Monthly Demand ........................................................................... iv. Max Day Demands ........................................................................ B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System ........................... i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR .......................... ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs ................................................... iii. Monthly Demand ........................................................................... iii. Max Day Demands ........................................................................ C. Current Water Supply for the North System ........................................... i. Fraser Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Sage Yield ...................... ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic ParameterData ............................................................................. D. Current Water Supply for the South System ........................................ i. Maryvale Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield .................... ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter ........ E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System ................... i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQRs for the North System ............ ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands ...................................... iii. Max Day Demands ........................................................................... F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the South System ................ i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System .......... ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open SpaceIrrigation ................................................................................ iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands ................................................ CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... LIST OF TABLES Table 1: North System Wells page 3 Table 2: South System Wells pages 8-9 Table 3: Current North System Demands Appendix Table 4: Current South System Demands Appendix Table 5: Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates pages 13-14 Table 6: North System Wellfield - Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Information Appendix Table 7: Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates page 15 Table 8: South System Wellfield — Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Details Appendix Table 9: North System — Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 10: North System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix Table 11: South System — Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 12: South System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix INTRODUCTION This 2020 Update to the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan ("Updated Water Plan") is primarily intended to provide a "picture in time" of the current legal and physical water supplies available to the Town of Fraser (the "Town"), in its role as a municipal water supplier. It is hoped and intended that the Updated Water Plan will be useful to the Town Board in decision- making and policy determinations regarding water supply issues, and as a resource to evaluate future potential growth and development; to the Town Staff, as a reference source for planning efforts, which identifies both the current limitations and future growth potential of the municipal water system; and to current and future, potential residents and business owners in the Town, who may be interested in a better understanding of the Town's water supplies. The Updated Water Plan relies heavily upon, and is generally intended as an update to, prior water supply planning efforts undertaken by the Town, including efforts in 2007 (resulting in a draft "Water Supply Master Plan" report, primarily prepared by Brown & Caldwell), and in 2015 resultin in the draft "Fraser Firmin Pro ect Study" report prepared by HRS Water w Consultants, Inc. ("HRS") and JRS Engineering Consultant, LLC), and less formal efforts by the Town Staff and its °(NNNI�uV III `N water team over the years. Preparation of i r y Y,,N II 4'I4 i ii�VV�� YV the Updated Water Plan was a collaborative effort involving input from the i J r�� II Vllil �/�I Fraser Town Board of Trustees; the Fraser NNn?Ip Town Staff; HRS; and the Town's water rights counsel. The Town's municipal water supply facilities include two independent, but physically connected, systems: (1) the "North System", which generally supplies geographic areas of the Town known as "Old Town Fraser", and the Byers Peak Properties development; and (2) the "South System" which supplies geographic areas of the Town encompassing the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments. This report is divided into two sections. The first section is a general description of the current legal water supplies for both the North and South Systems. The second section discusses the current and projected future water supply demands, and physical supplies for both the North and South Systems. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems A. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE NORTH SYSTEM L Town of Fraser's Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply) The North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the "Fraser Wells") with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. (See Table 1, North System Wells). As described in more 1 detail below, pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town, and are "exchange to" structures for the Town's decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out-of-priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System The original legal source for Fraser's "domestic water system" was decreed absolute in Civil Action 1175 for 2.28 cfs with an appropriation date of September 12, 1954 and an adjudication date of January 14, 1957 (the "Fraser Domestic Water Supply System"). The Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right is decreed for domestic and municipal purposes, including irrigation and fire protection. In Civil °i Action W-2279, the original point of diversion on St. Y'lll Louis Creek for this water right, was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. Later, in Case Nos. 82CW219 and 85CW339, the Town's alluvial wells were decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right. This water right was 8i�eI�VI d^ I in use for municipal and domestic use prior to October rl'lhI1�0��Id�ii ki�Vii� " I�IIIIIII q, p 1977 and, therefore, is covered by augmentation or �IIYY�Ilul I�„SII � replacement releases from the Historic Users Pool, or yyopuu vii ii i u 1111111 Illrl��ll'li �iy I lilwmuu liim� u "HUP", in Green Mountain Reservoir. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of July 22, 1982 and an adjudication date of July 5, 1985. Well Nos. 1-5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. These wells were also decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Town's Domestic Water System. Under the decree in Case No. 82CW219, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, when the wells are being pumped as alternate points of diversion. This is an important limitation on the legal water supply available to the North System. Additionally, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed the amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System at its decreed point of diversion. Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 are covered by the plan for augmentation approved in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987 (the "Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan"), as described in more detail in Section I.A.v., below. (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of February 28, 1985 and an adjudication date of November 8, 1988. Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. Like Fraser Well Nos. 1-5, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were designated as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water System. Again, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, and the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed that amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System water right at its decreed point of diversion, less any stream losses, from the point of diversion to the well locations. Table 1: North System Wells Well Case No. Approp. Adjud. Amou Amount Amount Permit Name Date Date nt Absolute Cond. No. (Cfs) (Cfs) (Cfs) Fraser 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.285 0.049 32203-F Well No. 1 Fraser 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.31 0.136 32204-F Well No. 2 Fraser 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.223 0.089 0.134 32205-F Well No. 3A (inactive) Fraser 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.156 0.178 32206-F Well No. 3B Fraser 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.0 0.446 32207-F Well No. 4 (ground water mon. well) Fraser 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.301 0.145 66896-F Well No. 5 Fraser 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.17 0.16 34809-F Well No. 7 Fraser 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.0 0.33. 34810-F Well No. 8 Fraser 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.44 0.44 0.0 34811-F Well No. 9 ii. Surface Water Rights (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension The St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension was decreed for irrigation purposes in Civil Action 183 with an appropriation date of June 1, 1904 and an adjudication date of August 3, 1911. The Town owns 1.0 cfs, absolute, to divert from St. Louis Creek. The water right was originally decreed for irrigation. In case number W-2280, this water right was changed from its original use to the following new uses: domestic, fire and sanitary, garden and lawn irrigation, and other household uses. Additionally, the point of diversion was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. The St. Louis Creek water right is not currently connected to the Town's municipal water supply system; however, the Town continues to evaluate the possibilities for physically incorporating the water available under these senior water rights into its daily water supplies (see, for example, the "Fraser Firming Study Project" report, referenced above), and anticipates and intends such use in the near future. (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 The Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 surface water right was decreed in Civil Action 407 on August 11, 1906 for 2.0 cfs, absolute, to divert out of Elk Creek for irrigation. Pursuant to the terms of the Water Court decree approving the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to "storage use for subsequent augmentation release." Fraser intends to utilize the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right in the future for the decreed augmentation use, and is currently evaluating various water storage options. iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts The Town has four water allotment contracts for Windy Gap Project water with the Middle Park Water Conservancy District ("MPWCD"). Two water allotment contracts are for water stored in Granby Reservoir, and two are "Windy Gap Standby Contracts" for water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir. Through all four contracts, the Town currently has leased 157.75 of of Windy Gap Project water. Sixty-five of of that amount currently is subject to a lease to the developer of the Grand Park property. The specific contracts are described in the following subsections. (a) Twenty-Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir Pursuant to a July 11, 1985 water allotment contract with MPWCD Fraser is entitled to 25 of of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir, which is located on the Colorado River upstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. This water allotment contract is perpetual. An exchange of this water from the confluence of the Fraser and Colorado Rivers to the Fraser Wells was decreed in Case No. 85CW337, Water Division 5. This 25 of may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water, pursuant to various agreements among the Town, other Grand County water suppliers, and Denver Water, pursuant to which Denver Water bypasses water available for diversion through its Moffatt Collection System. (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir Fraser is entitled to 80 of of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir pursuant to an August 1, 1989 water allotment contract with MPWCD. This water allotment contract is perpetual. Under a July 10, 1989 Lease Agreement, 65 of of the 80 of has been leased for potential irrigation of a golf course planned, at one time, for the Grand Park development. This 80 of of water is also the subject of a decreed exchange. Pursuant to the decree in Case No. 90CW235, Water Division No. 5, this water can be exchanged to various locations in the Fraser System and Maryvale System. The 15 of not being leased, may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (c) Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir Additionally, Fraser is entitled to 52.75 of of Windy Gap Project Standby water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir pursuant to two water allotment contracts entered in 2003 and 2004 ("Standby Water"). The Wolford Mountain Reservoir is located on Muddy Creek, which is tributary to the Colorado River downstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. These two contracts are perpetual and presumably valid if the Town maintains its other MPWCD Windy Gap Contracts. The Standby Water may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (2) Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement Fraser is a party to the Clinton-Reservoir-Fraser River Agreement ("Clinton Reservoir Agreement"), which was signed on July 21, 1992 and amended on October 26, 2016. Pursuant to the Agreement, Denver Water agreed to annually bypass at its intakes and make available from other components of Denver Water's delivery system, as necessary, 846 of of water to be used under the provisions of the Clinton Agreement and Grand County Water Users' Operating Plan ("Bypass Water"). The Town is entitled to 104.5 of of the Bypass Water. By decree in Case No. 92CW305, entered on November 19, 1996, Grand County Water & Sanitation District No. 1, Winter Park Water& Sanitation District, the Town of Granby, and the Town of Fraser ("Co-Applicants") sought and were awarded a conditional water right and approval of a plan for augmentation, including substitution and exchange to implement the provisions of the Clinton Agreement. Pursuant to the original decree and subsequent diligence decrees, water will be diverted under a 1992 priority at Denver's existing points of diversion and collection system and will be released from Denver's collection system on the Fraser River, St. Louis Creek, Little Vasquez Creek, and Vasquez Creek into those streams and used by each of the Co-Applicants at locations decreed to each of those entities under their existing water rights. Pursuant to the decree, the Bypass Water can be used for irrigation, domestic, and all municipal uses between September 15 and May 15 each year, but it is not decreed for storage. The seasonal limitation on the use of Bypass Water was eliminated in connection with the CRCA agreements described immediately below. (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement On September 23, 2010, Denver Water and seventeen entities from the West Slope executed the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement ("CRCA"), which resolves various longstanding disputes involving Denver Water's operations on the West Slope. The CRCA took effect on September 26, 2013. Pursuant to the CRCA and the 2012 Grand County Water Users Operating Plan ("GCWUOP"), Denver Water agreed to make 375 of of water available annually to the Grand County signatories ("Additional Bypass Water"), "upon issuance and acceptance by Denver Water of permits necessary for [Denver Water's] Moffat Project." Pursuant to the GCWUOP and the related "Implementation Agreement" between Denver Water and the Town, executed on October 9, 2013, the Town is conditionally entitled to 68.75 of of the Additional Bypass Water. Pursuant to the decree entered on March 15, 2016 in Case No. 11 CW152, the Additional Bypass Water may be used for municipal, snowmaking, domestic, commercial, irrigation, recreation, fish and wildlife, and fire protection uses. The Additional Bypass Water may be delivered for diversion to Fraser at the following locations: Gaskill Ditch; Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5; and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. Prior to diverting the Additional Bypass Water through its wells, pursuant to the decree in Case No. 11 CW152, Fraser will need to apply for and obtain new well permits to allow for diversion of deliveries of the Additional Bypass Water. iv. Storage — Reservoir No. 2 In Case No. 02CW367, on February 28, 2005, the Grand County Water & Sanitation District ("GCWSD") decreed GCWSD Reservoir No. 2 ("Reservoir No. 2") for municipal, irrigation, augmentation, piscatorial, aesthetic, and recreation uses with the right to fill and refill in priority to replace water applied to decreed uses and to replace evaporative losses. The Reservoir No. 2 water right was originally decreed for 80 af, conditional. This reservoir is an off- channel, lined reservoir located southwest of the Fraser River between the Maryvale Wells and the Fraser Wells. On July 31, 2018, the Town acquired from GCWSD No. 1, via deed, 25 of of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and 25 of of the storage capacity in the reservoir. GCWSD No. 1 also conveyed 25 of of the water right and 25 of of the storage capacity to Winter Park Water & Sanitation District ("WPWSD"). In Case No. 18CW3070, 70 of of this water right was decreed absolute for all decreed purposes with 10 of remaining conditional. GCWSD No. 1 owns the remaining 20 of of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and storage capacity. WPWSD, GCWSD, and Fraser executed an operating agreement for Reservoir No. 2 on July 30, 2018. V. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation As described above, the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan was decreed in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987. Pursuant to the approved augmentation plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to "storage use for subsequent augmentation release." Additionally, the plan is approved to provide replacement for out-of-priority depletions caused by the pumping of Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 for domestic, commercial, municipal, and irrigation uses. Fraser continues to investigate options for the construction of an augmentation pond to enable operation of the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Case No. 83CW362, a decreed storage pond for the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water, is required to implement the augmentation plan. B. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE SOUTH SYSTEM The following sections describe the legal water supplies for the South System: L Maryvale Augmentation Plan The Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation ("Maryvale Augmentation Plan") was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement between Fraser and Rendezvous Colorado, LLC ("Amended Annexation Agreement"), dated June 23, 2000, the Maryvale Augmentation Plan was conveyed, in large part, to the Town via Bargain and Sale Deed, dated June 23, 2000, and corrected on October 17, 2011 (the "Deed"). Among other rights, the Deed conveyed to Fraser 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right; 20 of of the "Mary's Pond" storage water right; 32.7 of of storage in augmentation/detention ponds located on Grand Park (the "Detention Reservoirs"); and "all of the benefits and burdens" of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The Maryvale Augmentation Plan provides for augmentation of 16 large capacity wells (1,600 gpm total) and 91 small capacity wells (maximum pumping rate of 15 gpm) to serve 2,822 equivalent residential units ("EQRs") and irrigate 17 acres. The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan W� is the 3.125 cfs Cozens Ditch water right, which was �1 historically used for the irrigation of 125 acres, and changed II~ ^ for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage. Prior to full build out of the development, the decree contemplates enlargement of the existing Maryvale Reservoir and the construction of up to six of the Detention Reservoirs to store excess historical consumptive use credit water and winter return flows. The 32.7 of of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for full operation of the Augmentation Plan was conveyed to Fraser by the Deed. H. Wells The South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed , and currently includes four active wells, which supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. See Table 2 ("South System Wells"). These four wells were constructed in the Troublesome Formation, which is considered tributary to the Fraser River. Out-of-priority stream depletions from these wells are fully covered by operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 99CW313, the Court adjudicated three of the 16 proposed large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. These wells are known as Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The maximum cumulative diversions r from the Maryvale Well water rights plus the Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. OOCW294, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a „II total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the VNi Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each individual Maryvale Well is 0.5 cfs (225 gpm). Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 are decreed for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, municipal, stockwatering, and fire protection uses. Pursuant to the Deed, 0.78 cfs cumulative of the Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 water rights was conveyed to Fraser for use in Fraser's municipal water supply system. Maryvale Well No. 1 was decreed absolute for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm)for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes in Case No. 08CW192. The remaining conditional amount is 0.31 cfs (139 gpm)for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes and 0.5 cfs (225 gpm) for industrial, municipal, stock watering, and fire protection purposes. The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make an additional portion of the Maryvale Well No. 1 water right absolute for municipal purposes in the amount of 0.20 cfs That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3020, is pending. (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. OOCW294, the Court adjudicated 13 of the 16 large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan in three well fields ("Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1, 2, and 3"). As mentioned above, the maximum cumulative diversions from the Rendezvous Well Field water rights plus the Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 99CW313, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each well within the Rendezvous Well Fields is up to 0.56 cfs (250 gpm). In Case. No. 08CW191, three wells were utilized to make a total of 0.57 cfs (255 gpm) of the Rendezvous Well Field No. 3 water right absolute for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purpose as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.99 cfs (40 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.29 cfs (130 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm). The total amount made absolute to date between all groundwater rights decreed in Case Nos. 99CW313 and OOCW294 is 0.76 cfs (341 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes with a total volume of 96.33 af. The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make additional portions of Maryvale Well Nos. 4, 5, and 7 absolute for municipal use for a total of 0.60 cfs (270 gpm) as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.11 cfs (47.3 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.30 cfs (135.7 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (86.5 gpm). That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3034, is pending. Table 2: South System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Adjud. Tot. Amt. Amt. Permit Date Date Amt. Abs. Cond. No. (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) Maryvale 99CW313 11/17/1999 12/31/2002 0.5 0.18 0.31 82996-F Well No. 1 (dom., (dom., irrig., irrig., comm.) comm.); 0.5 (other uses) Maryvale 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 Well No. 2 Maryvale 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 Well No. 3 Maryvale OOCW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.09 0.47 83256-F Well No. 4 (dom., (dom., irrig., irrig., comm.) comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) Maryvale OOCW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.29 0.27 83257-F Well No. 5 (dom., (dom., irrig., irrig., comm.) comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) Maryvale OOCW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.19 .37 83258-F Well No. 7 (dom., (dom., irrig., irrig., comm.) comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) iii. Surface Water Rights (1) Cozens Ditch The Cozens Ditch water right was decreed on August 1, 1906 in Civil Action No. 112, Grand County District Court in the amount of 3.125 cfs from Vasquez Creek for irrigation. Historically, the Cozens Ditch Water Right was diverted from May through August for the irrigation of approximately 125 acres. As mentioned above, the Cozens Ditch water right was changed in Case No. 98CW41 to be used for augmentation purposes under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By the Deed, 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right was conveyed to the Town. (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension In Case No. 99CW314, on December 31, 2002, the Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were adjudicated in the amounts of 3.1 cfs and 1.5 cfs, respectively, for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, stockwatering, fire protection, storage in the Detention Reservoirs, and supplemental irrigation of 125 acres. The Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were decreed to be used in conjunction with the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By decree entered on June 16, 2019 in Case No. 18CW3144, 1.76 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Enlargement water right and 1.5 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Extension water right were made partially absolute for irrigation use. iv. Reservoir/Pond Storage (1) Mary's Pond A main source of augmentation releases for the South System is the Maryvale Reservoir (aka "Mary's Pond"), which was decreed in Case No. W-462 on April 10, 1972 for 32.58 of for domestic, recreation, irrigation, and fish culture uses. Mary's Pond was later decreed for augmentation use in Case No. 86CW258 (superseded by the decree in Case No. 98CW041). The Maryvale Augmentation Plan contemplates a 16 of enlargement of Mary's Pond and storage of water from the Cozens Ditch in Mary's Pond for augmentation releases. The Town acquired 20 of of the Mary's Pond storage water right, via the Deed. On September 4, 2015, Rendezvous/Grand Park and the Town entered into a "Grant of Easement and Augmentation Pond Joint Operations Agreement," which sets forth the parties' agreement and respective obligations regarding the joint operation of Mary's Pond. Express provisions of this agreement anticipate that the Town and Grand Park will enter a similar easement and operations agreement relating to operation by the Town of the Detention Ponds on Grand Park, for augmentation use under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The current active water storage capacity of Mary's Pond is approximately 14 af. Releases from Mary's Pond are currently the primary source of augmentation water for out-of- priority depletions associated with operation of the Maryvale Wells. (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights The final decree entered on December 31, 1999 in Case No. 99CW315 adjudicated storage rights for ten detention reservoirs: Maryvale K-1 a Reservoir, Maryvale K-1 b Reservoir, Maryvale K-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-3 Reservoir, Maryvale E-F Reservoir, MR-1 Reservoir, MR-2 Reservoir, MR-3 Reservoir, and MR-4 Reservoir. The six Maryvale Reservoirs (K-1 a, K-1 b, K-2, J-2, J-3, and E-F), referred to above as the Detention Reservoirs, are contemplated as augmentation storage sites in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the Detention Reservoirs will be filled during the summer under the Cozens Ditch water right, and excess consumptive use credits and winter return flow water from the Cozens Ditch will be stored in the reservoirs. In the fall and winter, the Detention Reservoirs will be drawn down in order to replace winter stream depletions. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed conditional for irrigation, aesthetic, piscatorial, recreation, municipal, commercial, industrial, and for augmentation and exchange. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed in the cumulative amount of 36 af: K-1 a (7.0 af); K-1 b (5.0 af); K-2 (10.0 af); J-2 (2.0 af); J-3 (6.0 af); and E-F (6.0 af). Three of the Detention Reservoirs, K-1 a, K-1 b, and K-2, have been constructed, filled, and put to beneficial use in the following amounts: K-1 a (a series of three reservoirs with a total capacity of 3.43 af) and K-1 b and K-2 (one combined reservoir with a total capacity of 13.6 af). These three reservoirs are currently operated by Grand Park, but will be operated for augmentation purposes by the Town in the future. The three constructed reservoirs are located in different configurations than originally decreed, and are more than 200 feet from their decreed locations. The decree issued in Case No 08CW194 states: "[p]rior to making any of the subject conditional water rights absolute, Applicants or their successors shall obtain a decree confirming a change of location for any structure that is located at the originally decreed location." Thus, Grand Park/Rendezvous will need to file an application for change of water rights to reconcile the as-built locations of the reservoirs with the decreed locations before seeking to make the water rights absolute. The Deed conveyed to Fraser 32.7 of of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. C. Other Water Rights L Decreed Exchanges (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange In Case No. 85CW337, on October 2, 1989, a conditional right of exchange was approved to allow the exchange of Windy Gap water from Granby Reservoir to the nine Fraser Wells, which are the decreed "exchange to" locations. The exchange is decreed for 25 af, conditional. No separate uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for the Fraser Wells (i.e., irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes). The exchange allows diversion from the Fraser Wells, via exchange, when the water rights associated with the Fraser Wells may not otherwise be in priority. (2) Middle Park Exchange In Case No. 90CW235, on June 8, 1995, a conditional right of appropriative exchange was decreed for 80 af. The decreed exchange contemplates the exchange of Middle Park water from Granby Reservoir to various "exchange to" locations that include Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, the Gaskill Ditch, Wells RM-5, RM-6, and RM-7, Detention Reservoirs K-1 a, K-1 b, K-2, J- 2, J-3, E-F, and Mary's Pond. Sixty-five of is currently leased to Rendezvous/Grand Park. No separate independent uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for each "exchange to" structure. II. Physical Water Demands and Physical Supply A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System L Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR The North System supplies water generally to the "Old Town" Fraser area, and Byers Peak Ranch (pursuant to an out-of-town service agreement) and, temporarily, a portion of the Grand Park development. Table 3 is a current demand table, and includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volume demand estimates for the geographic areas currently served by the North System. In this analysis, Old Town Fraser's and Byers Peak Ranch's annual demand per EQR are assumed to be the same. This demand is based on an assumption of 275 gallons per day per EQR. Indoor average annual demand estimate for these areas is 0.308 aft EQR. Irrigation demand estimates are based on previous Brown & Caldwell water supply planning work for the Town. In the Fraser area, the irrigation season varies from year to year based on monthly temperatures during the "shoulder months" of I 'III IOvlip II�III� 11 Flu uiN'P uIV° the irrigation season. The irrigation season is ° til ° °III�i�u' A�u� Xidu u �NI111'iYii � � IIB4� generally considered to begin in May and end in September. Outdoor annual demand for the Old Town Frasers and Byers Peak Ranch areas is m ^w based on a 500 square foot lawn per EQR and vV Y I,°'ISI"W I, �,i p,ry IVlul �p an irrigation application rate of 1.01 of per acre ail Ir ,� illM1 ,, a ("ac"). These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.012 af/ EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.320 af/ EQR. The Grand Park indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/ EQR. This value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree in Case No. 98CW41 (which is converted from EQRs as defined in that decree). The irrigation season as defined by the 98CW41 decree is May through September. The Grand Park outdoor annual demand is based on a 250 square foot lawn per EQR with an irrigation application requirement of 1.387 of per ac. These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.008 of/EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 of/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The North System currently serves a total of 962 EQRs, 184 of which are located in in Grand Park. Based on these values and the "af/EQR" values above, the current Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch annual indoor demand is 239.8 of/yr, and the current irrigation demand is 9.0 of/yr. For the Grand Park area currently served by the North System, the current annual indoor demand is 56.7 of/yr and the current irrigation demands is 1.5 of/yr. Thus, the total current North System indoor demand is 296.6 of/yr and the total current irrigation demand is 10.5 of/yr. The total current North System demand is 307.0 of/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The max day demand is a gpm water delivery rate and is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells, or future surface sources, which supply the North System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Max day demand during the irrigation season is 0.312 gpm per EQR. Current max day demand for the 778 EQRs in the Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch areas is 242.9 gpm. Current max day demand for the 184 EQRs located in the Grand Park area currently served by the North System is 56.0 gpm. Thus, the total current max day demand for the North System is 298.8 gpm. B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System L Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water Per EQR The Town's South System supplies water to Rendezvous and Grand Park which comprise a geographic area located within the Town's municipal boundaries. Table 4 is a current demand table and it includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volumes of water currently required for the areas served by the South System. The South System indoor average annual demand is 0.308 of/EQR. This value is taken from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree issued in Case No. 98CW41. This decree also indicates that for purposes of operating the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the irrigation season is May through September and the irrigation demand value is 0.008 of/EQR. The outdoor annual demand in the decree is based on 250 square feet of lawn per EQR and 1.387 of/ac/yr. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 of/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The South system currently serves 465 EQRs. Based on these values and the "af/EQR" values above, the current annual indoor demand is 143.3 of/yr and the current annual irrigation demand is 3.7 of/yr. These values result in a current annual demand for the South System of 147.0 of/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The South System max day demand values are derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The average day indoor demand from the decree is 0.191 gpm/EQR and the average day irrigation demand is 0.012 gpm/EQR. The total average day demand is 0.203 gpm/EQR. The max day demand is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells supplying the South System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Based on the irrigation season average day values and the 1.5 max day factor, the max day indoor demand for the South System is 0.286 gpm/EQR. Based on the current 465 EQR total, the current South System max day demand is 141.4 gpm. C. Current Water Supply for the North System L Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield The North System's current water supply is from Fraser River alluvial wells. Table 5 identifies the Fraser Wells and their current average pumping rates during two periods, (1) spring and summer and (2) winter. The Fraser Well locations are shown on Figure 3. The spring and summer wellfield pumping total is 735 gpm and the winter wellfield pumping total is 458 gpm. The difference is due to two wells (3b and 9) being utilized/available seasonally. Table 5 Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates Well Spring &Summer Winter Pumping Rates Pumping Rate (gpm) (gpm) 1 120 120 2 78 78 3b 70 0 5 125 125 7 70 70 8 65 65 9 207 0 Total 735 458 The concept of"safe yield" with respect to the Fraser Well's includes wellfield production planning, such that the wells are capable of meeting Fraser's max day demand. One aspect of wellfield planning to achieve this goal is to have an installed wellfield capacity that exceeds the current max day demand. The current safe yield plan is that the Fraser Wells will be equipped with a total production capacity that is 100 gpm greater than the current max day demand. The additional, safe yield, 100 gpm wellfield production capacity allows for well and well equipment maintenance and repairs such that the North System will be able to meet max day demand when one well is not operational. As previously discussed, the current production capacity of the Fraser Wells is 735 gpm in the spring and summer, and 458 gpm in the winter. Table 3 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 399 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Fraser Wells can meet the current max day safe yield demand. In the future, the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System will be served by the South System. When this transition occurs, the Fraser Wells will obtain an additional 58.2 gpm of capacity to meet demands on the North System. This capacity, and additional wellfield improvements, will be required to meet development demands as projected into the future. ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The North System currently relies on seven wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed within the Fraser River alluvium. Table 6 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Fraser Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State's well permit files, HRS report files, and information from the Town staff. The table includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and recent water level data which was used to estimate saturated aquifer thickness. Static water level data was provided by Town staff for each of the active wells. These water levels were calculated based on measured water depth above the pressure transducer and an assumed transducer depth setting near the pump intake. D. Current Water Supply for the South System L Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield The current water supply for the South System is from the Maryvale Well, which are completed in the Troublesome Formations. Table 7 lists the Maryvale Wells and their current pumping rates. The Maryvale Wells are numbered 1, 4, 5, and 7. The Maryvale Well locations are shown on Figure 4. As noted in the comments column on Table 8, Well No. 6 is permitted only as a monitoring well. Table 7 Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates Well Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 87 4 43 5 134 7 85 Total 349 The current combined production capacity of the Maryvale Wells is 349 gpm. Table 4 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 241.4 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Maryvale Wells are capable of meeting the current max day safe yield demand. When the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System, are permanently transitioned to the South System, the South System's safe yield max day demand will be 299.6 gpm (141.4 gpm + 58.2 gpm + 100 gpm). The current combined pumping capacity of 349 gpm for the Maryvale Wells will be sufficient to meet this demand. iii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The South System currently relies on four active wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed in the Troublesome Formation which underlies the Fraser River alluvium. Table 8 provides an overview of the �`tiVll "x'01 hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for lulhJl'" II',III�IIuuYillVililn�l each of the Maryvale Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available i 'lviii �jli I0�1 information from the State's well 'permit files HRS report il0��i�llii`ilumiumlllllllllllllllllumiii;!, "�i�Ip�,'jl" "u,�V,611111111111�11 lllIIIIII ,1y° files and information from the Town staff. Table 8 also 4 6�p�IYpu4l"�"IIIIIIII I"�IIY��II nVd�lilu�N, includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and static water level data which was ' used to estimate the saturated thickness of the aquifer. Static water level data were taken from well construction reports for each well, as water levels in these wells are not monitored by Town staff. E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System L Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the North System The estimated total number of EQRs at buildout for the North System is 4,863 EQRs. The following EQRs are included in the buildout estimate: Old Town Fraser, Byers Peak Ranch, and possible future annexations. Using these categories, the total number of projected, future EQRs is: Old Town Fraser— 1,530 EQRs, Byers Peak Ranch — 1,233 EQRs, and future annexations- 2,100 EQRs. H. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Table 9 provides the annual volume of water required at buildout for each of the areas listed above. The values shown in Table 9 include: Old Town Fraser 489.4 of/yr, Byers Peak Ranch 394.4 of/yr, and future annexation - 671.7 of/yr. The total annual buildout demand is 1,555.5 of/yr. The values on Table 9 show that the annual irrigation volumes required at buildout are small percentages of the total annual demand. iii. Max Day Demands Table 9 also provides max day and safe yield max day demand estimates in EQRs intervals by area. Safe yield max day demand values are obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 1,577 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 1,677 gpm. The EQR estimates and their corresponding safe yield max day demand pumping rates will be used to help determine and plan for future wells, water supply infrastructure, and water rights acquisitions/strategies that will be required to meet the future North System safe yield max day demands over time. The purpose of Table 10 is to track Fraser wellfield installation, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future North System demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQR for the South System L Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System The estimated number of EQRs at buildout for the Rendezvous and Grand Park areas, served by the South System, is 2,822 EQRs. This total EQR value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The 2,822 EQR total includes the 184 EQRs currently served by the North System, and 91 EQRs contemplated under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree to be served by small capacity wells. Currently none of the 91 small capacity wells have been constructed and it is not likely any of these wells will be constructed. H. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation With a total EQR estimate of 2,822 EQRs, and an annual value of 0.316 of/EQR, the total annual demand estimate for the South System is 892.4 of/yr. Of this total, 869.0 of/yr is for indoor demand and 23.4 of/yr is outdoor irrigation demand. iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands The total max day demand estimate during the irrigation season for 2,822 EQRs under the South System is 858.2 gpm. This value is based on an indoor max day value of 0.286 gpm/EQR and an outdoor irrigation demand of 0.018 gpm/EQR. Table 11 provides demand estimates in EQR intervals of approximately 200 EQRs. Safe yield max day demand values were obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 858.2 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 958.2 gpm. The EQR estimates included in Table 11 will be used to help determine and plan for the future wells and water supplies infrastructure that will be required to meet the future demand to be served by the South System. The purpose of Table 12 is to track installation of additional Maryvale Wells, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future wellfield demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. CONCLUSION Current and future water demand and supplies for Fraser's North and South Systems are discussed and quantified above in the Physical Water Demands and Supply section of this report. Significant conclusions and recommendations from the above discussions and work performed include the following: 1. Fraser's North and South System wellfields have the capacity to meet current safe-yield max day demands. The Future Demand to Buildout tables and spreadsheets (see Tables 9 through 12) for the North and South Systems are based on incremental EQR increases. The spreadsheets should be used in the Town's water supply planning to understand the max day water supply requirements of additional EQRs on the Town's water supply systems. 2. The Town should continue to promote and support water conservation, particularly during the irrigation season. 3. Water supplies for additional development beyond the current demands should be in place at least three months before the water is needed. This recommendation may require that water supply development work begin no later than two years before the water may be needed. 4. If Water Court applications are required to obtain new water rights or to change the Town's current water rights, this work should begin no later than three years before the water is needed. 5. The Town should continue to monitor and record all well pumping and water level data (both static and pumping levels). 6. Regular review of the water well production and water level data will be important to determine when pumping equipment and well maintenance should be performed. Pumping equipment should be removed from wells and inspected at approximately five-year intervals. At this time a video survey of the well should be performed and appropriate well rehabilitation work completed. 7. The onsite water supply potential should be evaluated for any new annexation area. 8. The Town's current augmentation storage is sufficient for its current water supply demand. Additional augmentation storage will be necessary to meet future legal and physical water supply requirements. 9. Accounting for both the North and South Systems should continue to be updated on a monthly basis, and the Town should continue to work with the Colorado Department of Water Resources staff with respect to water rights accounting matters. 10. The Town's St. Louis Creek and Elk Creek surface water rights continue to be important components of the Town's future water supplies and planning efforts. 11. The Town should continue to evaluate possible water rights/storage acquisitions that may arise in the future, to provide additional certainty and protection against increasing demands and changing legal and climatological circumstances. 12. The Town should continue incrementally perfecting its conditional water rights through the diligence and Water Court process. The Town should vigilantly protect its legal water supplies by monitoring and prudently participating in Water Court proceedings potentially impacting the Town's water rights. 13. The Town should continue to be an active participant in all existing and future water related agreements with third-parties, and proactively steer its water supply development activities to maximize the benefits of those agreements (e.g., the Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement, the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement). Glossary of Terms • Ac = Acre = 1 Ac = 43,560 Square Feet • Af = Acre-Feet = 1 Af= 325,851 gallons • Avg = Arithmetic Average • Af/Ac/Yr = Acre-Feet per Acre per Year • Af/EQR = Acre-Feet per Equivalent Residential Unit • Af/Yr = Acre-Feet per Year • CFS = Cubic Feet Per Second = 1 cfs = 448.8 GPM and 1 CFS/day = 1.9835 acre- feet • EQR = Equivalent Residential Unit - 1 EQR is typically considered to equate to full- time occupancy for an average of 2.75 people. EQRs are reduced for multi-family and commercial units. 1 EQR has a water demand of 275 gallons/day. • Ft = Feet • Gal = Gallon of Water • GPM = Gallons Per Minute • GPM/EQR = Gallons Per Minute/Equivalent Residential Unit • Hp = Horse Power • Q = Well Pumping Discharge Rate • WTP = Water Treatment Plant • WY = Water Year (November 1 — October 31) m 0 ) m \ © 0 R 2 2 ( 3 \ ° * m e ° Q a m Lu m L kD 0 m E \ \ a 5 j t J � ¥ j m � o 0 o m e M. 2 E - & 3 \ a a 6 m % § - 2 � � 2 ° 2 2 \ / \ \ \ \ \ j \ \ \ / k . E o o o 0 a o o f _ m > E < � ƒ 0 E -i6 k ° & § ƒ \ \ 2 0 0 0 \ § / k § k33 m \ ) fes 0 2 kE _ � o = mo o 00 _ UD $ k u k 2 \ o q % 0 cm % 0 q _ ~ ( J s a d a a d a a d � + % 0 £ 3 { CfLn § \ N cu § 2 7 m k on v § ƒ / � 2 = y » » r \ E7 § - 2 [ \ cc o ƒ� ± \ _ 2 ) [ y / M cu ƒ k 0 ƒ / k / ai Ln ~ \ 3 ± * 2 * ® 0 ® M 0 ~ Ln � A § f 7 2 7 0 y 0 cu § \ � k � F � _ / Ij 8 w § ® \ / ± I Af ) ) j f 0 { a § \ \ & & & § 7 f # _ _ _ ) - - e a a a j ) ) ) CL - - - # # # \ % 2 2 2 2 f m o & & & 0. 0.� / ■ J a) a) a) \ \ \ M O F R m \ ƒ ƒ LL / / / & & & k / -0y@ � -4 M m CL \ ® Rr 0 - $ j \ m E / o o 2 j M aW - < _ E F m m e CL 00 a 7 E - ® ■ § 2 � 0 Cr _ � m § A « g g % E ■ k a a a � 2 a E � t e 2 E % / \ . R o - m m $ \ f §§ � \ k / \ 2 $ 5 k � \ ] E o _ / m / \ kms j J \ w / ƒ \ cr ° m / m 2 / ] EA » ± $ ƒ § m \ / 0 0 z - - M • j ) o / < < < g \ \ \ LA LLg u * * c 0 § � / F m \ \ \ \ o 3 > v E m m c o �- a- c° 3 - c x Q m E E N -\°-Q E ac _ -E �- y 0 a v N m E E o o m o - E a o -.. -.. E E 3 O n N « m a E a LL r d m m - o io .1 d s o O� Oa �°° o`� Oc r m 1.� a a v rn� „ c a uo.K E m LL ry E m ED J O £� ELq E� a Z Z E� E= EL E" E a s s s s s s E o 1 rn eN a a c a' - .Q _a m v W c w� R r o x O L o D U a a LL L p m v N t0 C O Z O O 2 3 rn a 0 0 a 2 d y mW5m m m m m y N R m m = - o m v LL O Z r o o° > E > E E E o �'- E E > E > E E > E LL U LL LL F LL LL LL LL LL LL F F o E 3 3 3 E ¢ ¢ U U U Q oi� N O W i(l w N W W W N W N WN W W ill m z o z o K o K `q K o z o K z o K z o K o O o �t/i �Uj 4'iN 2'i(/i v_N vU> utA uN uuj N E O o E Z LL _ a E v a v ol Q m d N '� o 65a - r co m C ai o M coo C z° zo z z z z° z° 0 vii `a o 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 y o C m N v C y C u w N n LL LL �3 £ 65 ) 0 k � 7 \ - \�» §�» (\f \}e \}4 16 \ ci ± } / ) k / ] $ \ o 3 £ E o — a` c m M. 2. a 0 a o o z 3 E 'a o. a o E O O1 Y u u a o � v 75 m � w m c. o o o ~ a c Q v Cf tiG m N ^ W 0 0 0 — o ry m m ry 1° E o00 000 000 000 � m i. � Em O ci % v o 0 0 a « c a Q u C O T N — s w 3 WUorvN mrvn mom orvN ° 0°.oi ' mc , I r,' „m a oo cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,'.9 m ^`�-. ��:+M7� �y ry mjmQl a+m i n vn�,c �;v cr LL O O. ? � Q cr o cy o o vo Z o LLo = o E o -a E o LL E m o ¢ a a T E E E v L c m~ m ° o o o K _ — — - - o a — C m m > > > y `g co_ g c LL r u — — — z z a a a E E " v = mmm � , LL15 z " �\ .w ! \ }�} �\ / \ .} mo } � M CL V E W W CD O bL a v v C v m � Lo coa c o w w o 3 'a E \ N o m E a £ 0 0 o c � CL o a' v � c 0 CL - £ u 1 a co N O C bL N m a_ 3 — 3 3 o ¢ 3 _ v v +�+ m } 7 z c 7C 00\ p C a a 110 4711'7 t00 '',Vm 1� 1mv�'' W i', G `m a s o a M 00 01 'O Y bo N 3 LL X C m C T > Ol M N ~ N p. lOD7 lOO tOD t00 �(,'lOD W N W c lt9 ++ c pbq N 7 c c N � L R U A 5 c cr o o M cc m s, a b1 Twli'opo o Q 10 O o O N G y lt9 •-I NI N ' M C. ,Urt tD V(;li'h �Ihr, 00 0 � H cr W cr N N ��n O1 OT O1 � O1 01 N N cy r 2y'N {'41 c-I 4WI c-I 4WIc-I rt�jl ci C L U y C O _ rn E N G Caq ^� O i O to a` � u ca w :a O VI k'M 0,0 V1 � V M IA: 1N a H I 0 �' T N �F7 tD '', O Cyl V I W N w V GO O_ 0 CO w O 6 O O O > c O E no f6M E m v � L I I 0 o V p N O C r�u p m 00 v °' Y vaj 3 o � 3 E a — > m N o m a u 7L Q. O w M LL CL U O O -6 a 3 0 v u O M. m v c m C 07 m m n - E _ _ OC d O C to t6 to 8 C O O O O O S � C � H H H H ................ \ � �« / �p ` ƒ \ ) \ �/ �\�\ Ai \ �} \ \ / \ \ / Ad#: 0000697493-01 NOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT Customer:TOWN OF FRASER, Not— ,hoses g,­plo—el to'39-29-101. C 15 that un 1 ab..t July 25th 2021 hnal settle- e,,t wlll be rued.w,Ih Molt,Coestructars,Inc ler Your account number is:1095750 the Town of Fraser--Metals 9 Phohphoroe Treat- ent Metlihcahons"prosect for the Uppar Frasor Vnlloy Wastewater Treatment Plant,contract darod PROOF OF PUBLICATION April 2019.r.Fraaah comrade Any part,.,,trtat M13s tuinisM1ad labor,materials,equipment r 1,1,h,- le PARK TIMES ,. t°old,I°mero.Pdi rldrealapr°se..Y`s°d.t iho work on iho mit a claim uprm final sd ete,a by f the w the Town of Fraser a vended et of the l the amount STATE OF COLORADO duo a,,t Fear a.n Ftoo 70 me ser, wnh me Town of Frasor,2 O Box 970,at Sa,GO 9044. COUNTY OF GRAND soa,,, are3ihall e brie he Town of Fraser f free, any Ilab6ty for nlak,eq payntont to said contractor Published In the M0,11,Park Times on June 24 I,Meg Boyer,do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of the 2021 000()997.193 MIDDLE PARK TIMES,that the same weekly newspaper printed,in whole or in part and published in the County of Grand,State of Colorado,and has a general circulation therein;that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Grand for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement;that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879,or any amendments thereof,and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 insertion;and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 6/24/2021 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 6/24/2021 in the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof,I have here unto set my hand this day, 7/6/2021. Meg Boyer,Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me,a notary public in and for the County of Grand,State of Colorado this day 7/6/2021. b Jeri Medina,Notary Public My Commission Expires: August 19,2024 yew uentNA rwTAav vueuc srwre aF co�ofxAoo PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE MINUTES DATE: Friday, June 18th 2021 MEETING: Public Arts Committee Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT Board: Eric Vandernail, Lisa Baird, Tara Rose, Callie McDermott, Jerilyn Suster, Natalie Grote, Jeff Bartholomew, Cindy McCoy, Kerry Crandall, Sean Yarborough, Steve Fitzgerald Staff: Marketing and Communications Manager, Sarah Wieck 1. Regular Meeting: Roll Call Steve called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. 2. Approval of Agenda: Lisa moved, and Jerilyn seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 11-0. 3. Consent Agenda: Minutes— May 21st, 2021 Callie moved, and Lisa seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda. Motion carried: 11-0. 4. Discussion a. Welcome Newly Appointed Committee Members b. Committee Conduct c. Historic Church Remodel i. Update to new members on remodel d. Mural Festival i. Update on festival to new members ii. Need someone to manage musicians iii. Additional meetings e. Artoberfest i. Meet with Brian to determine format ii. New members will be taking the lead f. Sculpture Program i. Call for entries for 2022 Page 2 of 2 ii. Use cafe.org 5. Open Forum: 6. Other Business: 7. Future Agenda Items: a. Artoberfest b. Mural locations Meeting Adjourned: Callie moved, and Tara seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 11-0. Meeting adjourned at 11:13 a.m. FRASER WATER &WASTEWATER COMMITTEE MINUTES DATE: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 MEETING: Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT: Committee: Committee Chair Ron Anderson, Dennis Soles, Mayor Philip Vandernail, Eileen Waldow and Bob Wolf Staff: Town Manager Ed Cannon; Finance Manager Beth Williams; Public Works Director Russell Pennington; Water Superintendent Adam Cwiklin; Assistant Town Manager Michael Brack Other: None Committee Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 9:02 a.m. 1. Roll Call: 2. Approval of Agenda: Soles moved, and Vandernail seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 5-0. 3. Consent Agenda—Approval of Minutes: December 01, 2020 Soles moved, and Vandernail seconded the motion to approve the minutes. Motion carried: 5-0. 4. a. Scope And Mission Of The Water Wastewater Committee: Topics discussed included updating the Water Wastewater Committee ordinance which includes discussion with the Town Board about any changes; how the appeal process should work; the makeup of the committee like how many Town Board members vs how many community members; how often should the Town Board be updated on what was discussed during committee meetings; how often should the committee meet and what types of topics should be discussed (at least meet quarterly for updates on what is happening with the Town that would be of interest to the committee like development/capital projects, taps, educational/training topics, budget and capital improvement plan). 4. b. How To Utilize Saint Louis Creek Water Rights: Due to time restraints with attendees, this topic will be discussed at a future meeting. 5. Other Business: No Other Business to discuss. 6. Future Agenda Items: How to utilize Saint Louis Creek Water Rights Water&Wastewater Committee July 13, 2021 Page 2 7. Adjourn: Vandernail moved to end the Regular Meeting and Wolf seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 09:58 a.m. Beth Williams, Finance Manager TOWN OF FRASER COMBINED CASH INVESTMENT MAY 31,2021 COMBINED CASH ACCOUNTS 01-10200 GENERAL CHECKING#878-000884 206,029.66 01-10215 XPRESS DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 1,640.99 01-10220 GENERAL CO-01-0160-8001 15,029,362.48 TOTAL COMBINED CASH 15,237,033.13 01-10100 CASH ALLOCATED TO OTHER FUNDS ( 15,237,033.13) TOTAL UNALLOCATED CASH .00 CASH ALLOCATION RECONCILIATION 10 ALLOCATION TO GENERAL FUND 7,113,146.66 12 ALLOCATION TO RESTRICTED REVENUE FUND 570,362.05 20 ALLOCATION TO CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 22,487.34 30 ALLOCATION TO CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND 146,843.80 32 ALLOCATION TO CAPITAL ASSET FUND ( 232,499.03) 35 ALLOCATION TO CROS FUND 211,322.15 40 ALLOCATION TO DEBT SERVICE FUND 35,531.06 50 ALLOCATION TO WATER FUND 2,147,288.52 55 ALLOCATION TO WASTEWATER FUND 5,222,550.58 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS TO OTHER FUNDS 15,237,033.13 ALLOCATION FROM COMBINED CASH FUND-01-10100 ( 15,237,033.13) ZERO PROOF IF ALLOCATIONS BALANCE .00 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND ASSETS 10-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND 7,113,146.66 10-11100 PROPERTY TAXES RECEIVABLE 352,669.00 10-11550 ACCTS REC-BILLINGS 17,018.54 10-11600 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIVABLES 62,073.69 TOTAL ASSETS 7,544,907.89 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES 10-20200 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TRADE 80,533.20 10-21000 ACCRUED WAGES 41,866.05 10-21710 FWT/FICA PAYABLE 14,235.31 10-21730 STATE WITHHOLDING PAYABLE 7,022.00 10-21740 UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES PAYABLE 1,090.25 10-21750 RETIREMENT PLAN PAYABLE 4,947.44 10-21755 457 DEFERRED COMP PAYABLE 3,682.46 10-21760 HEALTH INSURANCE PAYABLE 39,922.76 10-21773 DEPENDENT CARE PAYABLE 3,608.28 10-21775 FLEX HEALTH PLAN PAYABLE 605.24 10-21780 GARNISHMENTS PAYABLE 591.41 10-21900 ECONOMIC INCENTIVE FEE REBATE 45,038.00 10-22210 DEFERRED TAXES 352,669.00 10-22920 SUBDIVISION IMP SECURITY DEP 25,702.50 10-22950 RENTAL PROPERTY DEPOSITS HELD 500.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES 622,013.90 FUND EQUITY 10-27000 GF COMMITTED RESERVE BALANCE 1,000,000.00 10-27050 GF STRATEGIC RESERVES 1,100,000.00 10-27100 GF RESTRICTED RESERVE BALANCE 258,615.20 UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 4,564,278.79 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 4,564,278.79 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 6,922,893.99 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 7,544,907.89 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT TAXES 10-31-100 GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX 58,020.79 228,205.73 350,000.00 121,794.27 65.2 10-31-200 SPECIFIC OWNERSHIP TAX 2,651.49 9,041.87 12,000.00 2,958.13 75.4 10-31-300 MOTOR VEHICLE TAX .00 .00 4,500.00 4,500.00 .0 10-31-400 TOWN SALES TAX 371,716.86 1,043,663.24 2,750,000.00 1,706,336.76 38.0 10-31-410 USE TAX-BUILDING MATERIALS 26,902.36 223,853.73 100,000.00 ( 123,853.73) 223.9 10-31-420 USE TAX-MOTOR VEHICLE SALES 11,517.82 60,674.42 65,000.00 4,325.58 93.4 10-31-430 STATE CIGARETTE TAX 448.35 601.70 3,200.00 2,598.30 18.8 10-31-800 FRANCHISE FEES 14,073.59 38,751.85 55,000.00 16,248.15 70.5 TOTALTAXES 485,331.26 1,604,792.54 3,339,700.00 1,734,907.46 48.1 LICENSES&PERMITS 10-32-100 BUSINESS LICENSE FEES 4,600.00 5,980.00 15,000.00 9,020.00 39.9 10-32-110 REGULATED INDUSTRY FEES/TAXES 21,640.95 91,233.00 120,000.00 28,767.00 76.0 TOTAL LICENSES&PERMITS 26,240.95 97,213.00 135,000.00 37,787.00 72.0 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 10-33-100 GRANTS .00 35,000.00 .00 ( 35,000.00) .0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL .00 35,000.00 .00 ( 35,000.00) .0 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 10-34-100 ANNEXATION FEES .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 10-34-110 ZONING FEES .00 250.00 1,500.00 1.250.00 16.7 10-34-120 SUBDIVISION FEES 650.00 23,750.00 1,500.00 ( 22,250.00) 1583.3 10-34-130 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING FEES .00 80.00 1,000.00 920.00 8.0 10-34-300 PAYT 2,282.50 27,169.00 35,000.00 7,831.00 77.6 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,932.50 51,249.00 40,000.00 ( 11,249.00) 128.1 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 10-36-100 INTEREST EARNINGS 337.29 1,969.10 35,000.00 33,030.90 5.6 10-36-300 RENTAL INCOME 400.00 3,325.00 12,000.00 8,675.00 27.7 10-36-600 COMMUNITY HOUSING 1,800.00 5,400.00 15,000.00 9,600.00 36.0 10-36-610 REIMBURSABLE-PROF SERVICES 10,869.04 26,716.34 50,000.00 23,283.66 53.4 10-36-630 DISPOSABLE BAG FEES .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 10-36-900 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,870.27 28,328.84 30,500.00 2,171.16 92.9 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 16,276.60 65,739.28 152,500.00 86,760.72 43.1 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 10-39-920 TRANSFER IN FROM GF RESERVES .00 .00 6,379.00 6,379.00 .0 10-39-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 4,172,073.08 4,172,073.08 2,508,918.15 ( 1,663,154.93) 166.3 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 4,172,073.08 4,172,073.08 2,515,297.15 ( 1,656,775.93) 165.9 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 4,702,854.39 6,026,066.90 6,182,497.15 156,430.25 97.5 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT TOWN BOARD 10-41-110 SALARIES .00 8,450.00 35,000.00 26,550.00 24.1 10-41-220 FICATAX .00 508.74 3,825.00 3,316.26 13.3 10-41-280 TRAINING PROGRAMS .00 10.00 6,000.00 5,990.00 .2 10-41-290 TRAVEL,MEALS AND LODGING 1,790.90 1,790.90 5,500.00 3,709.10 32.6 10-41-295 MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT 234.00 2,181.94 10,000.00 7,818.06 21.8 10-41-690 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 128.52 1,820.88 10,500.00 8,679.12 17.3 10-41-860 GRANTS AND AID TOAGENCIES .00 300.00 5,000.00 4,700.00 6.0 10-41-861 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENTS .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 10-41-862 FRASER/WINTER PARK POLICE DEPT 54,841.00 274,205.00 650,000.00 375,795.00 42.2 10-41-863 STREET LIGHTING AND SIGNALS 1,274.52 5,214.19 22,750.00 17,535.81 22.9 10-41-864 SPECIAL EVENTS .00 5,772.92 15,000.00 9.227.08 38.5 10-41-870 BUSINESS DIST STREETSCAPE .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 10-41-871 BUSINESS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS .00 30,500.00 82,500.00 52,000.00 37.0 10-41-872 SUSTAINABILITY .00 .00 15,000.00 15,000.00 .0 10-41-873 RECYCLE FACILITY 5,158.94 33,269.21 50,000.00 16,730.79 66.5 10-41-874 COMMUNITY HOUSING .00 .00 750,000.00 750,000.00 .0 10-41-875 MARKETING .00 3,271.29 25,000.00 21,728.71 13.1 TOTAL TOWN BOARD 63,427.88 367,295.07 1,696,075.00 1,328,779.93 21.7 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT ADMINISTRATION 10-45-110 SALARIES 39,435.46 215,075.24 500,000.00 284,924.76 43.0 10-45-210 HEALTH INSURANCE 6,526.34 34,131.70 90,000.00 55,868.30 37.9 10-45-220 FICATAX 2,126.68 11,932.79 32,000.00 20,067.21 37.3 10-45-230 RETIREMENT 1,766.14 9,512.42 20,000.00 10,487.58 47.6 10-45-250 UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 88.86 497.97 1,200.00 702.03 41.5 10-45-280 TRAINING PROGRAMS .00 630.00 8,000.00 7,370.00 7.9 10-45-290 TRAVEL,MEALS AND LODGING 2,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .00 100.0 10-45-295 MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT 424.66 2,039.76 6,000.00 3.960.24 34.0 10-45-310 LEGAL FEES .00 42,555.50 175,000.00 132,444.50 24.3 10-45-320 AUDIT FEES 4,800.00 17,300.00 18,200.00 900.00 95.1 10-45-330 ENGINEERING FEES .00 .00 3,500.00 3,500.00 .0 10-45-360 COMPUTERS-NETWORKS AND SUPPORT 8,295.55 42,078.59 90,000.00 47,921.41 46.8 10-45-370 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,260.00 24,332.74 90,000.00 65,667.26 27.0 10-45-375 REIMBURSABLE PROF SERVICES 428.90 17,045.40 50,000.00 32,954.60 34.1 10-45-380 JANITORIAL SERVICES 1,218.98 5,566.28 15,918.12 10,351.84 35.0 10-45-385 TREASURER'S FEES 1,160.42 4,565.26 7,725.00 3,159.74 59.1 10-45-395 RECORDING FEES .00 750.00 1,500.00 750.00 50.0 10-45-410 BANK CHARGES 1,248.39 3,876.96 8,000.00 4,123.04 48.5 10-45-420 ELECTIONS .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 10-45-430 INSURANCE-ALL DEPARTMENTS 30,439.75 65,448.94 75,000.00 9,551.06 87.3 10-45-440 ADVERTISING .00 760.03 2,500.00 1,739.97 30.4 10-45-490 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 249.50 9,700.27 12,000.00 2,299.73 80.8 10-45-500 OPERATING SUPPLIES 714.69 4,788.41 15,435.00 10,646.59 31.0 10-45-510 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR .00 209.99 10,000.00 9,790.01 2.1 10-45-550 POSTAGE 170.97 1,040.54 2,500.00 1,459.46 41.6 10-45-560 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 298.27 3,948.63 7,500.00 3,551.37 52.7 10-45-561 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 252.45 1,520.89 3,500.00 1,979.11 43.5 10-45-562 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 923.72 4,262.96 6,400.00 2,137.04 66.6 10-45-670 PROP MGMT-107 EISENHOWER DR 1,403.12 8,555.33 20,000.00 11,444.67 42.8 10-45-671 PROP MGMT-105 FRASER AVE .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 10-45-673 PROP MGMT-153 FRASER AVE 1,969.53 7,029.86 60,000.00 52,970.14 11.7 10-45-674 PROP MGMT-200 EISENHOWER DR .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 10-45-690 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 104.00 2,543.89 20,000.00 17,456.11 12.7 10-45-740 CAPITAL PURCHASES .00 81.94 .00 ( 81.94) .0 10-45-830 LOAN-PRINCIPAL 382.12 36,497.42 .00 ( 36,497.42) .0 10-45-840 LOAN-INTEREST 6.26 56.10 .00 ( 56.10) .0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 109,694.76 588,335.81 1,367,878.12 779,542.31 43.0 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT PUBLIC WORKS 10-60-110 SALARIES 40,808.79 245,366.33 735,000.00 489,633.67 33.4 10-60-210 HEALTH INSURANCE 12,305.50 70,671.33 215,000.00 144,328.67 32.9 10-60-220 FICATAX 2,792.18 16,836.57 58,000.00 41,163.43 29.0 10-60-230 RETIREMENT 1,871.59 11,339.06 33,000.00 21,660.94 34.4 10-60-250 UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 123.25 740.59 2,350.00 1,609.41 31.5 10-60-280 TRAINING PROGRAMS .00 1,085.00 3,500.00 2,415.00 31.0 10-60-290 TRAVEL,MEALS AND LODGING .00 .00 2,500.00 2,500.00 .0 10-60-295 MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 10-60-330 ENGINEERING FEES .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0 10-60-360 COMPUTER NETWORK SUPPORT 22,133.10 24,742.22 33,075.00 8.332.78 74.8 10-60-370 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 880.00 2,930.56 90,000.00 87,069.44 3.3 10-60-480 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,418.20 2,418.20 2,500.00 81.80 96.7 10-60-490 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 124.75 640.75 1,000.00 359.25 64.1 10-60-500 OPERATING SUPPLIES 8,336.38 42,364.34 90,000.00 47,635.66 47.1 10-60-506 PLANTS/PLANTER SUPPLIES 3,084.48 3,092.78 70,000.00 66,907.22 4.4 10-60-510 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR 11,992.98 31,367.83 75,000.00 43,632.17 41.8 10-60-560 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 292.77 1,690.65 4,000.00 2,309.35 42.3 10-60-561 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 249.01 2,776.90 5,000.00 2,223.10 55.5 10-60-670 PROP MGMT-125 FRASER AVE 346.00 4,108.85 7,500.00 3,391.15 54.8 10-60-673 PROP MGMT-FRASER RIVER TRAIL 276.00 1,310.01 10,000.00 8,689.99 13.1 10-60-674 PROP MGMT-HWY 40 PEDESTRIAN .00 .00 6,000.00 6,000.00 .0 10-60-675 PROP MGMT-KOPPERS PARK .00 .00 1,500.00 1,500.00 .0 10-60-676 PROP MGMT-OLD SCHLHOUSE PK .00 108.19 5,000.00 4,891.81 2.2 10-60-679 PROP MGMT-SCHOOL BUS GARAGE 729.18 4,015.27 5,000.00 984.73 80.3 10-60-681 PROP MGMT-COZENS RANCH PARK 1,452.99 3,670.67 15,000.00 11,329.33 24.5 10-60-684 PROP MGMT-FRODO .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 10-60-685 PROP MGMT-MTN MAN PARK .00 108.18 500.00 391.82 21.6 10-60-686 GORANSON STATION .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 10-60-687 PROP MGMT-6 W .00 762.80 5,000.00 4,237.20 15.3 10-60-690 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 1,448.68 3,484.45 8,000.00 4,515.55 43.6 10-60-740 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES 513.49 9,317.98 90,000.00 80,682.02 10.4 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 112,179.32 484,949.51 1,630,425.00 1,145,475.49 29.7 120 ZEREX AVENUE 10-65-380 JANITORIAL SERVICES 1,452.99 5,522.10 15,000.00 9,477.90 36.8 10-65-561 UTILITIES-NATURAL GAS 96.51 569.56 1,236.36 666.80 46.1 10-65-562 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 117.64 476.55 1,236.36 759.81 38.5 10-65-670 PROP MGMT-120 ZEREX .00 533.24 5,000.00 4,466.76 10.7 TOTAL 120 ZEREX AVENUE 1,667.14 7,101.45 22,472.72 15,371.27 31.6 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 GENERALFUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT TRANSFERS 10-90-920 TRANSFER TO CERF-POLICE DEPT .00 .00 60,000.00 60,000.00 .0 10-90-930 TRANSFER TO CERF-PUBLICWORKS .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0 10-90-935 TRANSFER TO CAF .00 .00 550,000.00 550,000.00 .0 10-90-960 TRANSFER TO CROS .00 .00 326,379.00 326,379.00 .0 10-90-970 TRANSFER TO COMMITTED RESERVES .00 .00 75,500.00 75,500.00 .0 10-90-980 TRANSFER TO STRATEGIC RESERVES .00 .00 400,000.00 400,000.00 .0 TOTAL TRANSFERS .00 .00 1,461,879.00 1,461,879.00 .0 FISCALAGENT 10-95-110 SALARIES ( 1,109.89) 8,459.86 .00 ( 8,459.86) .0 10-95-210 HEALTH INSURANCE .00 4,577.20 .00 ( 4,577.20) .0 10-95-220 FICATAX ( 84.90) 583.92 .00 ( 583.92) .0 10-95-230 RETIREMENT ( 44.40) 416.79 .00 ( 416.79) .0 10-95-250 UNEMPLOYMENT TAX ( 3.33) 25.50 .00 ( 25.50) .0 10-95-560 TELEPHONE .00 43.00 .00 ( 43.00) .0 TOTAL FISCAL AGENT ( 1,242.52) 14,106.27 .00 ( 14,106.27) .0 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 285,726.58 1,461,788.11 6,178,729.84 4,716,941.73 23.7 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 4,417,127.81 4,564,278.79 3,767.31 ( 4,560,511.48) 12115 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 RESTRICTED REVENUE FUND ASSETS 12-10100 CASH COMBINED FUND 570,362.05 TOTAL ASSETS 570,362.05 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 570,362.05 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 570,362.05 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 570,362.05 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 570,362.05 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 RESTRICTED REVENUE FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT TAXES 12-31-100 RESTRICTED 1%GF SALES TAX 92,929.21 260,915.81 687,500.00 426,584.19 38.0 12-31-800 INTEREST INCOME 26.37 136.54 500.00 363.46 27.3 TOTALTAXES 92,955.58 261,052.35 688,000.00 426,947.65 37.9 INTERGOVENMENTAL 12-33-100 GRANTS&AID TOAGENCIES .00 .00 11,000.00 11,000.00 .0 TOTAL INTERGOVENMENTAL .00 .00 11,000.00 11,000.00 .0 OTHER SOURCES 12-39-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 537,576.89 537,576.89 38,838.25 ( 498,738.64) 1384.1 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 537,576.89 537,576.89 38,838.25 ( 498,738.64) 1384.1 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 630,532.47 798,629.24 737,838.25 ( 60,790.99) 108.2 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 RESTRICTED REVENUE FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT EXPENDITURES 12-40-610 TRANSPORTATION O&M 63,320.76 228,213.13 680,000.00 451,786.87 33.6 12-40-710 TRAILS O&M 54.06 54.06 20,000.00 19,945.94 .3 12-40-715 TRAILS-CAPITAL EXPENDITURES .00 .00 35,000.00 35,000.00 .0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 63,374.82 228,267.19 735,000.00 506,732.81 31.1 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 63,374.82 228,267.19 735,000.00 506,732.81 31.1 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 567,157.65 570,362.05 2,838.25 ( 567,523.80) 20095. TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND ASSETS 20-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND 22,487.34 TOTAL ASSETS 22,487.34 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 22,487.34 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 22,487.34 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 22,487.34 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 22,487.34 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT REVENUE 20-30-100 CONS TRUST(LOTTERY)PROCEEDS .00 1,873.29 6,800.00 4,926.71 27.6 20-30-800 INTEREST EARNINGS 1.10 6.51 75.00 68.49 8.7 20-30-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 20,607.54 20,607.54 20,637.32 29.78 99.9 TOTAL REVENUE 20,608.64 22,487.34 27,512.32 5,024.98 81.7 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 20,608.64 22,487.34 27,512.32 5,024.98 81.7 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT EXPENDITURES 20-40-920 TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 20,608.64 22,487.34 17,512.32 ( 4,975.02) 128.4 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND ASSETS 30-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND 146,843.80 TOTAL ASSETS 146,843.80 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 146,843.80 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 146,843.80 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 146,843.80 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 146,843.80 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT REVENUE 30-30-100 HWY USE TAX PROCEEDS 4,357.33 15,346.85 47,393.85 32,047.00 32.4 30-30-800 INTEREST EARNINGS 7.07 56.62 2,500.00 2,443.38 2.3 30-30-900 TRANSFER FROM G/F-POLICEDEPT .00 .00 60,000.00 60,000.00 .0 30-30-910 TRANSFER FROM G/F-PUBLICWORK .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0 30-30-920 TRANSFER FROM UTILITY FUNDS .00 .00 90,000.00 90,000.00 .0 30-30-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 205,694.78 205,694.78 139,839.39 ( 65,855.39) 147.1 TOTAL REVENUE 210,059.18 221,098.25 389,733.24 168,634.99 56.7 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 210,059.18 221,098.25 389,733.24 168,634.99 56.7 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT EXPENDITURES 30-40-745 PUBLIC SAFETY FLEET PURCHASE .00 .00 60,000.00 60,000.00 .0 30-40-755 HEAVY EQUIPMENT PURCHASE .00 .00 200,000.00 200,000.00 .0 30-40-810 LEASE/PURCHASE-PRINCIPAL 2,336.34 67,310.75 100,000.00 32,689.25 67.3 30-40-820 LEASE/PURCHASE-INTEREST 191.01 6,943.70 15,000.00 8,056.30 46.3 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,527.35 74,254.45 375,000.00 300,745.55 19.8 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2,527.35 74,254.45 375,000.00 300,745.55 19.8 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 207,531.83 146,843.80 14,733.24 ( 132,110.56) 996.7 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 CAPITAL ASSET FUND ASSETS 32-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND ( 232,499.03) TOTALASSETS ( 232,499.03) LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: 32-29800 FUND BALANCE-BEGINNING OF YR ( 276,568.37) REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 44,069.34 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE ( 232,499.03) TOTAL FUND EQUITY ( 232,499.03) TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY ( 232,499.03) TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CAPITAL ASSET FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT CAPITALASSET REVENUE 32-30-100 RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE .00 .00 80,000.00 80,000.00 .0 32-30-800 INTEREST EARNINGS ( 11.15) ( 69.15) .00 69.15 .0 32-30-910 TRANSFER IN FROM GENERAL FUND .00 .00 550,000.00 550,000.00 .0 32-30-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 53,433.57 53,433.57 113,178.62 59,745.05 47.2 TOTAL CAPITAL ASSET REVENUE 53,422.42 53,364.42 743,178.62 689,814.20 7.2 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 53,422.42 53,364.42 743,178.62 689,814.20 7.2 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CAPITAL ASSET FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT CAPITALASSET EXPENDITURES 32-40-810 CAPITAL PROJ-STREETS EXISTING 3,826.56 9,295.08 740,000.00 730,704.92 1.3 TOTAL CAPITAL ASSET EXPENDITURES 3,826.56 9,295.08 740,000.00 730,704.92 1.3 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 3,826.56 9,295.08 740,000.00 730,704.92 1.3 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 49,595.86 44,069.34 3,178.62 ( 40,890.72) 1386.4 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 CROS FUND ASSETS 35-10100 CASH COMBINED FUND 211,322.15 TOTAL ASSETS 211,322.15 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 211,322.15 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 211,322.15 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 211,322.15 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 211,322.15 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CROS FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT INTERGOVERNMENTAL-REVENUE 35-30-100 GRANTS AND AWARDS .00 .00 735,000.00 735,000.00 .0 35-30-130 INTEREST INCOME 10.30 65.28 .00 ( 65.28) .0 35-30-910 TRANSFER IN FROM GENERAL FUND .00 .00 326,379.00 326,379.00 .0 35-30-920 TRANSFER IN FROM CTF .00 .00 10,000.00 10,000.00 .0 35-30-999 CARRYOVER BALANCE 212,991.87 212,991.87 212,962.79 ( 29.08) 100.0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL-REVENUE 213,002.17 213,057.15 1,284,341.79 1,071,284.64 16.6 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 213,002.17 213,057.15 1,284,341.79 1,071,284.64 16.6 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 CROS FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT PROJECT WIDE SCOPE-EXPENSES 35-40-320 LANDSCAPE .00 .00 60,000.00 60,000.00 .0 35-40-330 PLAYGROUND .00 .00 600,000.00 600,000.00 .0 35-40-335 RESTROOMS .00 1,735.00 600,000.00 598,265.00 .3 TOTAL PROJECT WIDE SCOPE-EXPENSES .00 1,735.00 1,260,000.00 1,258,265.00 .1 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES .00 1,735.00 1,260,000.00 1,258,265.00 .1 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 213,002.17 211,322.15 24,341.79 ( 186,980.36) 868.2 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 DEBT SERVICE FUND ASSETS 40-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND 35,531.06 TOTAL ASSETS 35,531.06 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY 40-27100 DSF COMMITTED RESERVE BALANCE 33,693.16 UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 1,837.90 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 1,837.90 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 35,531.06 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 35,531.06 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 DEBT SERVICE FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT REVENUE 40-30-800 INTEREST EARNINGS 1.73 10.89 1,000.00 989.11 1.1 40-30-999 CARRYOVER BALANCE 1,827.01 1,827.01 2,572.53 745.52 71.0 TOTAL REVENUE 1,828.74 1,837.90 3,572.53 1,734.63 51.5 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 1,828.74 1,837.90 3,572.53 1,734.63 51.5 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 1,828.74 1,837.90 3,572.53 1,734.63 51.5 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 WATER FUND ASSETS 50-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND 2,147,288.52 50-10290 CASH W/TREASURER-COLLECTIONS 830.42 50-11500 A/R CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES 8,249.91 50-11550 A/R-BILLINGS 676.00 50-11560 A/R-DEFERRED PIF 336,233.34 50-16100 LAND 100,000.00 50-16200 BUILDINGS 3,040,174.49 50-16203 WELLS SYSTEM 958,079.74 50-16212 WATER DISTRIBUTION/STORAGE 10,159,161.12 50-16213 WELLS 1,083,397.93 50-16400 EQUIPMENT 353,994.02 50-16500 WATER RIGHTS 651,359.86 50-17900 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ( 264,164.67) 50-17901 ACCUMULATED DEPR-BLDGS&IMPR ( 1,363,498.00) 50-17902 ACCUMULATED DEPR-SYSTEM&IMPR ( 5,134,042.00) TOTAL ASSETS 12,077,740.68 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES 50-20776 DUE TO GRAND PARK-TAPS 361,900.00 50-21100 ACCRUED PTO AND BENEFITS 11,503.00 50-22910 ROAD CUT SURITY FEES 34,680.75 50-22920 BULK WATER SECURITY DEP 14,900.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES 422,983.75 FUND EQUITY 50-27000 WF COMMITTED RESERVE BALANCE 500,000.00 50-27050 WF STRATEGIC RESERVES 155,525.00 UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: 50-29800 RETAINED EARNINGS 9,967,527.69 REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 1,031,704.24 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 10,999,231.93 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 11,654,756.93 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 12,077,740.68 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 WATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT LICENSES&PERMITS 50-32-100 EXCAVATION PERMIT FEES 550.00 550.00 275.00 ( 275.00) 200.0 TOTAL LICENSES&PERMITS 550.00 550.00 275.00 ( 275.00) 200.0 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 50-34-100 CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES 104.62 264,565.30 1,100,000.00 835,434.70 24.1 50-34-150 PENALTIES&INTEREST 44.56 2,154.42 2,000.00 ( 154.42) 107.7 50-34-200 PLANT INVESTMENT FEES 30,800.00 240,240.00 7,700.00 ( 232,540.00) 3120.0 50-34-300 WATER METER SALES 5,686.28 34,076.99 50,000.00 15,923.01 68.2 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 36,635.46 541,036.71 1,159,700.00 618,663.29 46.7 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50-36-100 INTEREST EARNINGS 104.06 554.06 6,000.00 5,445.94 9.2 50-36-900 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 901.00 1,502.00 2,500.00 998.00 60.1 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,005.06 2,056.06 8,500.00 6.443.94 24.2 OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 50-39-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 781,538.24 781,538.24 764,123.50 ( 17,414.74) 102.3 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 781,538.24 781,538.24 764,123.50 ( 17,414.74) 102.3 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 819,728.76 1,325,181.01 1,932,598.50 607,417.49 68.6 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 WATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT EXPENDITURES 50-40-110 SALARIES 21,974.51 123,982.99 310,000.00 186,017.01 40.0 50-40-210 HEALTH INSURANCE 5,448.96 28,458.97 80,000.00 51,541.03 35.6 50-40-220 FICATAX 1,572.02 8,858.01 25,000.00 16,141.99 35.4 50-40-230 RETIREMENT 1,289.15 7,224.96 15,000.00 7,775.04 48.2 50-40-250 UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 66.30 374.18 1,000.00 625.82 37.4 50-40-280 TRAINING PROGRAMS .00 652.50 3,500.00 2,847.50 18.6 50-40-290 TRAVEL,MEALS AND LODGING .00 .00 3,500.00 3.500.00 .0 50-40-295 MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT .00 .00 2,000.00 2.000.00 .0 50-40-310 LEGAL FEES 2,300.00 22,828.00 65,000.00 42,172.00 35.1 50-40-330 ENGINEERING FEES 2,156.50 34,925.06 100,000.00 65,074.94 34.9 50-40-360 COMPUTERS-NETWORKS AND SUPPORT 1,551.54 5,281.31 7,000.00 1.718.69 75.5 50-40-370 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 627.28 1,268.07 60,000.00 58,731.93 2.1 50-40-430 INSURANCE .00 .00 27,000.00 27,000.00 .0 50-40-440 ADVERTISING .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 50-40-460 SYSTEM REPAIR AND MAINT-PROD 1,177.50 5,966.73 160,000.00 154,033.27 3.7 50-40-465 SYSTEM REPAIR AND MAINT-DIST 1,526.22 1,526.22 265,000.00 263,473.78 .6 50-40-490 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 62.37 5,232.12 9,500.00 4,267.88 55.1 50-40-500 OPERATING SUPPLIES-PRODUCTION 1,661.45 5,880.19 25,000.00 19,119.81 23.5 50-40-505 OPERATING SUPPLIES-DISTRIB 1,981.00 19,201.42 80,000.00 60,798.58 24.0 50-40-510 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR .00 .00 15,000.00 15,000.00 .0 50-40-520 TESTING 154.84 504.84 10,000.00 9,495.16 5.1 50-40-550 POSTAGE&BILLING SUPPLIES .00 731.98 3,000.00 2,268.02 24.4 50-40-560 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 895.64 4,810.30 10,000.00 5,189.70 48.1 50-40-562 UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY 3,252.36 14,969.76 50,000.00 35,030.24 29.9 50-40-670 PROP MGMT-FRASER WTP .00 .00 60,000.00 60,000.00 .0 50-40-680 PROP MGMT-MARYVALE WTP .00 .00 8,000.00 8,000.00 .0 50-40-690 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 3.70 145.13 1,500.00 1,354.87 9.7 50-40-715 WATER RIGHTS-DIVERSION&DEV .00 654.03 45,000.00 44,345.97 1.5 50-40-730 CAPITAL PROJECTS .00 .00 425,000.00 425,000.00 .0 50-40-930 TRANSFER TO CERF .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0 50-40-980 TRANSFER TO STRATEGIC RESERVES .00 .00 7,700.00 7,700.00 .0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 47,701.34 293,476.77 1,919,200.00 1,625,723.23 15.3 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 47,701.34 293,476.77 1,919,200.00 1,625,723.23 15.3 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 772,027.42 1,031,704.24 13,398.50 ( 1,018,305.74) 7700.2 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 WASTEWATER FUND ASSETS 55-10100 CASH-COMBINED FUND 5,222,550.58 55-10290 CASH W/TREASURER-COLLECTIONS 589.78 55-11500 A/R CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES 7,162.67 55-11560 A/R-DEFERRED PIF 327,500.00 55-11900 MISCELLANEOUS RECEIVABLES 8,604.74 55-13090 DUE FROM JFOC ( 4,430.00) 55-15950 CAP REPL RES HELD W/JFOC 920,714.60 55-15955 O&M RESERVE HELD W/JFOC 53,861.22 55-16100 LAND 144,320.40 55-16200 SEWER TREATMENT PLANT 3,399,895.89 55-16210 METER BUILDING&IMPROVEMENTS 8,056.39 55-16220 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 11,179,204.75 55-16250 CONSOLIDATED COLLECTION SYSTEM 279,069.00 55-16400 EQUIPMENT 110,782.16 55-16450 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 2,826,086.00 55-17900 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ( 1,400,458.64) 55-17901 ACCUMU DEPR-BLDG IMPROVE ( 8,073.00) 55-17905 ACCUM DEPR-PLANT/JFOC ( 69,767.24) 55-17910 ACCUM DEPR-SEWER COLLECT-FSD ( 5,659,734.89) 55-17915 ACCUM DEPR-EQUIPMENT ( 89,903.17) TOTAL ASSETS 17,256,031.24 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES 55-21100 ACCRUED PTO AND BENEFITS 17,143.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES 17,143.00 FUND EQUITY 55-27000 WWF COMMITTED RESERVE BAL-O&M 500,000.00 55-27010 WWF COMMITTED RESERVE BAL-CAP 221,000.00 55-27020 WWF COMMITTED RESERVE BAL-JFF 330,000.00 55-27030 WWF COMMITTED RESERVE-PLANT 1,050,000.00 55-27050 WWF STRATEGIC RESERVES 1,255,000.00 UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: 55-29800 RETAINED EARNINGS 8,061,549.52 55-29810 RETAINED EARNINGS-UNRESTRICT 59,753.00 55-29820 RETAINED EARNINGS-RESTRICTED 701,475.11 REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES-YTD 5,060,110.61 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 13,882,888.24 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 17,238,888.24 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 17,256,031.24 TOWN OF FRASER REVENUES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 WASTEWATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEARNED PCNT CHARGES FOR SERVICES 55-34-100 CUSTOMER SERVICE CHARGES 88.38 218,985.85 990,000.00 771,014.15 22.1 55-34-150 PENALTIES&INTEREST 12.87 1,968.84 1,000.00 ( 968.84) 196.9 55-34-200 PLANT INVESTMENT FEES 30,000.00 466,500.00 300,000.00 ( 166,500.00) 155.5 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 30,101.25 687,454.69 1,291,000.00 603,545.31 53.3 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 55-36-100 INTEREST EARNINGS 256.53 1,540.54 18,500.00 16,959.46 8.3 55-36-500 JFF MANAGEMENT FEE .00 7,250.00 29,000.00 21,750.00 25.0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 256.53 8,790.54 47,500.00 38,709.46 18.5 OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 55-39-999 UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE 4,726,398.65 4,726,398.65 2,953,351.33 ( 1,773,047.32) 160.0 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 4,726,398.65 4,726,398.65 2,953,351.33 ( 1,773,047.32) 160.0 TOTAL FUND REVENUE 4,756,756.43 5,422,643.88 4,291,851.33 ( 1,130,792.55) 126.4 TOWN OF FRASER EXPENDITURES WITH COMPARISON TO BUDGET FOR THE 5 MONTHS ENDING MAY 31,2021 WASTEWATER FUND PERIOD ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL BUDGET UNEXPENDED PCNT EXPENDITURES 55-40-110 SALARIES 22,358.46 126,102.44 325,000.00 198,897.56 38.8 55-40-210 HEALTH INSURANCE 5,585.40 29,115.20 83,000.00 53,884.80 35.1 55-40-220 FICA TAX 1,598.56 9,002.11 27,000.00 17,997.89 33.3 55-40-230 RETIREMENT 1,311.97 7,334.69 17,000.00 9,665.31 43.2 55-40-250 UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 67.41 380.39 1,000.00 619.61 38.0 55-40-280 TRAINING PROGRAMS .00 192.50 3,000.00 2,807.50 6.4 55-40-290 TRAVEL,MEALS AND LODGING .00 .00 3,000.00 3.000.00 .0 55-40-295 MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT .00 .00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .0 55-40-310 LEGAL FEES .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .0 55-40-330 ENGINEERING FEES .00 .00 20,000.00 20,000.00 .0 55-40-360 COMPUTERS-NETWORKS AND SUPPORT 1,551.55 4,962.79 7,000.00 2,037.21 70.9 55-40-370 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 627.29 1,268.07 15,000.00 13,731.93 8.5 55-40-410 BANK CHARGES .00 .00 100.00 100.00 .0 55-40-430 INSURANCE .00 .00 7,000.00 7,000.00 .0 55-40-440 ADVERTISING .00 .00 500.00 500.00 .0 55-40-460 SYSTEM REPAIRAND MAINT-COLLEC 43,542.80 77,281.80 150,000.00 72,718.20 51.5 55-40-490 PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 62.38 5,314.13 6,000.00 685.87 88.6 55-40-500 OPERATING SUPPLIES-COLLECTIONS .00 89.84 5,500.00 5,410.16 1.6 55-40-510 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPAIR .00 .00 50,000.00 50,000.00 .0 55-40-520 TESTING .00 .00 1,000.00 1,000.00 .0 55-40-550 POSTAGE&BILLING SUPPLIES .00 700.00 2,500.00 1.800.00 28.0 55-40-560 UTILITIES-TELEPHONE 180.36 1,553.32 2,000.00 446.68 77.7 55-40-650 WW TREATMENT CHARGES/JFOC 16,411.38 99,090.86 290,000.00 190,909.14 34.2 55-40-690 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 3.70 145.13 3,000.00 2,854.87 4.8 55-40-730 CAPITAL PROJECTS .00 .00 250,000.00 250,000.00 .0 55-40-930 TRANSFER TO CERF .00 .00 45,000.00 45,000.00 .0 55-40-980 TRANSFER TO STRATEGIC RESERVES .00 .00 800,000.00 800,000.00 .0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 93,301.26 362,533.27 2,120,600.00 1,758,066.73 17.1 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 93,301.26 362,533.27 2,120,600.00 1,758,066.73 17.1 NET REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 4,663,455.17 5,060,110.61 2,171,251.33 ( 2,888,859.28) 233.1 TOWN OF FRASER BALANCE SHEET MAY 31,2021 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ASSETS 91-16100 LAND 730,630.35 91-16200 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 208,379.39 91-16203 MAINTENANCE BUILDING 57,722.51 91-16208 HOUSE-400 DOC SUSIE AVE 54,839.27 91-16209 VISITOR CENTER 183,895.00 91-16211 BUSBARN&105 FRASER AVE HOUSE 100,000.00 91-16250 CHURCH 267,000.00 91-16306 PARKS 367,800.08 91-16311 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 3,439,840.00 91-16312 HIGHWAY 40 PATH 8,872.00 91-16490 EQUIPMENT-OTHER 872,015.00 91-16500 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 57,261.75 91-17900 ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ( 2,260,048.61) TOTAL ASSETS 4,088,206.74 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY FUND EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE: 91-29800 INVESTMENT IN FIXED ASSETS 4,088,206.74 BALANCE-CURRENT DATE 4,088,206.74 TOTAL FUND EQUITY 4,088,206.74 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 4,088,206.74