Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution 2021-08-02 Adopting Water Supply Master Plan Town of Fraser Water Supply Report June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems ………………..... A. Legal Water Supplies for the North Fraser System ………………………………………... i. Town of Fraser’s Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply …………………. (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System ………………………………………………………………….. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4 and 5 …………………………………………… (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 ………………………………………………………….. ii. Surface Water Rights ……………………………………………………………….. (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension ………………………… (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 …………………………………………………………. iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights ……………………………… (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts ……………. (a) Twenty-Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir …………………………………………………………. (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir ………………………………….. (c) Windy Gap Project Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir …………… (2) Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement …………………………. (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement ……………………………………. iv. Storage – Fraser Reservoir No. 2 ………………………………………………… v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation ………………………………………… B. Legal Water Supplies for the South System …………………………………….. i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan ………………………………………………………. ii. Wells ………………………………………………………………………………….. (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 ………………………………………………. (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 …………………………………………. iii. Surface Water Rights ……………………………………………………………….. (1) Cozens Ditch ……………………………………………………………………. (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension…………………………………… ii. Reservoir/Pond Storage …………………………………………………………… (1) Mary’s Pond ……………………………………………………………………. (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights ………………………………………………. B. Other Water Rights …………………………………………………………………. i. Decreed Exchanges ……………………………………………………………... (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange ……………………………………….. (2) Middle Park Exchange ……………………………………………………… II. Physical Water Supply Demand for the North System …………………………….. A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System …………………………. i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR ……………….. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs …………………………………………… iii. Monthly Demand ………………………………………………………………… iv. Max Day Demands ……………………………………………………………… B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System ……………………… i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR …………………….. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs …………………………………………… iii. Monthly Demand ………………………………………………………………… iii. Max Day Demands ……………………………………………………………… C. Current Water Supply for the North System ……………………………………. i. Fraser Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Sage Yield …………………. ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data ………………………………………………………………….. D. Current Water Supply for the South System …………………………………. i. Maryvale Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield ……………….. ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter …….. E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System ………………. i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQRs for the North System ………… ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands ……………………………….. iii. Max Day Demands ………………………………………………………………... F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the South System ……………. i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System ………. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation …………………………………………………………………….. iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands ………………………………………… CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………………………. LIST OF TABLES Table 1: North System Wells page 3 Table 2: South System Wells pages 8-9 Table 3: Current North System Demands Appendix Table 4: Current South System Demands Appendix Table 5: Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates pages 13-14 Table 6: North System Wellfield - Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Information Appendix Table 7: Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates page 15 Table 8: South System Wellfield – Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Details Appendix Table 9: North System – Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 10: North System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix Table 11: South System – Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 12: South System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix 1 INTRODUCTION This 2020 Update to the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan (“Updated Water Plan”) is primarily intended to provide a “picture in time” of the current legal and physical water supplies available to the Town of Fraser (the “Town”), in its role as a municipal water supplier. It is hoped and intended that the Updated Water Plan will be useful to the Town Board in decision- making and policy determinations regarding water supply issues, and as a resource to evaluate future potential growth and development; to the Town Staff, as a reference source for planning efforts, which identifies both the current limitations and future growth potential of the municipal water system; and to current and future, potential residents and business owners in the Town, who may be interested in a better understanding of the Town’s water supplies. The Updated Water Plan relies heavily upon, and is generally intended as an update to, prior water supply planning efforts undertaken by the Town, including efforts in 2007 (resulting in a draft “Water Supply Master Plan” report, primarily prepared by Brown & Caldwell), and in 2015 (resulting in the draft “Fraser Firming Project Study” report prepared by HRS Water Consultants, Inc. (“HRS”) and JRS Engineering Consultant, LLC), and less formal efforts by the Town Staff and its water team over the years. Preparation of the Updated Water Plan was a collaborative effort involving input from the Fraser Town Board of Trustees; the Fraser Town Staff; HRS; and the Town’s water rights counsel. The Town’s municipal water supply facilities include two independent, but physically connected, systems: (1) the “North System”, which generally supplies geographic areas of the Town known as “Old Town Fraser”, and the Byers Peak Properties development; and (2) the “South System” which supplies geographic areas of the Town encompassing the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments. This report is divided into two sections. The first section is a general description of the current legal water supplies for both the North and South Systems. The second section discusses the current and projected future water supply demands, and physical supplies for both the North and South Systems. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems A. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE NORTH SYSTEM i. Town of Fraser’s Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply) The North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the “Fraser Wells”) with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. (See Table 1, North System Wells). As described in more detail below, pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town, and are “exchange to” structures for the Town’s decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out-of-priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System The original legal source for Fraser’s “domestic water system” was decreed absolute in Civil Action 1175 for 2.28 cfs with an appropriation date of September 12, 1954 and an adjudication date of January 14, 1957 (the “Fraser Domestic Water Supply System”). The Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right is decreed for domestic and municipal purposes, including irrigation and fire protection. In Civil Action W-2279, the original point of diversion on St. Louis Creek for this water right, was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. Later, in Case Nos. 82CW219 and 85CW339, the Town’s alluvial wells were decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right. This water right was in use for municipal and domestic use prior to October 1977 and, therefore, is covered by augmentation or replacement releases from the Historic Users Pool, or “HUP”, in Green Mountain Reservoir. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of July 22, 1982 and an adjudication date of July 5, 1985. Well Nos. 1-5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. These wells were also decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Town’s Domestic Water System. Under the decree in Case No. 82CW219, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, when the wells are being pumped as alternate points of diversion. This is an important limitation on the legal water supply available to the North System. Additionally, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed the amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System at its decreed point of diversion. Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 are covered by the plan for augmentation approved in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987 (the “Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan”), as described in more detail in Section I.A.v., below. (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of February 28, 1985 and an adjudication date of November 8, 1988. Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. Like Fraser Well Nos. 1-5, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were designated as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water System. Again, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, and the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed that amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System water right at its decreed point of diversion, less any stream losses, from the point of diversion to the well locations. Table 1: North System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Date Adjud. Date Amou nt (cfs) Amount Absolute (cfs) Amount Cond. (cfs) Permit No. Fraser Well No. 1 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.285 0.049 32203-F Fraser Well No. 2 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.31 0.136 32204-F Fraser Well No. 3A (inactive) 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.223 0.089 0.134 32205-F Fraser Well No. 3B 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.156 0.178 32206-F Fraser Well No. 4 (ground water mon. well) 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.0 0.446 32207-F Fraser Well No. 5 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.301 0.145 66896-F Fraser Well No. 7 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.17 0.16 34809-F Fraser Well No. 8 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.0 0.33. 34810-F Fraser Well No. 9 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.44 0.44 0.0 34811-F ii. Surface Water Rights (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension The St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension was decreed for irrigation purposes in Civil Action 183 with an appropriation date of June 1, 1904 and an adjudication date of August 3, 1911. The Town owns 1.0 cfs, absolute, to divert from St. Louis Creek. The water right was originally decreed for irrigation. In case number W-2280, this water right was changed from its original use to the following new uses: domestic, fire and sanitary, garden and lawn irrigation, and other household uses. Additionally, the point of diversion was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. The St. Louis Creek water right is not currently connected to the Town’s municipal water supply system; however, the Town continues to evaluate the possibilities for physically incorporating the water available under these senior water rights into its daily water supplies (see, for example, the “Fraser Firming Study Project” report, referenced above), and anticipates and intends such use in the near future. (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 The Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 surface water right was decreed in Civil Action 407 on August 11, 1906 for 2.0 cfs, absolute, to divert out of Elk Creek for irrigation. Pursuant to the terms of the Water Court decree approving the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to “storage use for subsequent augmentation release.” Fraser intends to utilize the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right in the future for the decreed augmentation use, and is currently evaluating various water storage options. iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts The Town has four water allotment contracts for Windy Gap Project water with the Middle Park Water Conservancy District (“MPWCD”). Two water allotment contracts are for water stored in Granby Reservoir, and two are “Windy Gap Standby Contracts” for water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir. Through all four contracts, the Town currently has leased 157.75 af of Windy Gap Project water. Sixty-five af of that amount currently is subject to a lease to the developer of the Grand Park property. The specific contracts are described in the following subsections. (a) Twenty-Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir Pursuant to a July 11, 1985 water allotment contract with MPWCD Fraser is entitled to 25 af of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir, which is located on the Colorado River upstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. This water allotment contract is perpetual. An exchange of this water from the confluence of the Fraser and Colorado Rivers to the Fraser Wells was decreed in Case No. 85CW337, Water Division 5. This 25 af may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water, pursuant to various agreements among the Town, other Grand County water suppliers, and Denver Water, pursuant to which Denver Water bypasses water available for diversion through its Moffatt Collection System. (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir Fraser is entitled to 80 af of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir pursuant to an August 1, 1989 water allotment contract with MPWCD. This water allotment contract is perpetual. Under a July 10, 1989 Lease Agreement, 65 af of the 80 af has been leased for potential irrigation of a golf course planned, at one time, for the Grand Park development. This 80 af of water is also the subject of a decreed exchange. Pursuant to the decree in Case No. 90CW235, Water Division No. 5, this water can be exchanged to various locations in the Fraser System and Maryvale System. The 15 af not being leased, may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (c) Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir Additionally, Fraser is entitled to 52.75 af of Windy Gap Project Standby water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir pursuant to two water allotment contracts entered in 2003 and 2004 (“Standby Water”). The Wolford Mountain Reservoir is located on Muddy Creek, which is tributary to the Colorado River downstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. These two contracts are perpetual and presumably valid if the Town maintains its other MPWCD Windy Gap Contracts. The Standby Water may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (2) Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement Fraser is a party to the Clinton-Reservoir-Fraser River Agreement (“Clinton Reservoir Agreement”), which was signed on July 21, 1992 and amended on October 26, 2016. Pursuant to the Agreement, Denver Water agreed to annually bypass at its intakes and make available from other components of Denver Water’s delivery system, as necessary, 846 af of water to be used under the provisions of the Clinton Agreement and Grand County Water Users’ Operating Plan (“Bypass Water”). The Town is entitled to 104.5 af of the Bypass Water. By decree in Case No. 92CW305, entered on November 19, 1996, Grand County Water & Sanitation District No. 1, Winter Park Water & Sanitation District, the Town of Granby, and the Town of Fraser (“Co-Applicants”) sought and were awarded a conditional water right and approval of a plan for augmentation, including substitution and exchange to implement the provisions of the Clinton Agreement. Pursuant to the original decree and subsequent diligence decrees, water will be diverted under a 1992 priority at Denver’s existing points of diversion and collection system and will be released from Denver’s collection system on the Fraser River, St. Louis Creek, Little Vasquez Creek, and Vasquez Creek into those streams and used by each of the Co-Applicants at locations decreed to each of those entities under their existing water rights. Pursuant to the decree, the Bypass Water can be used for irrigation, domestic, and all municipal uses between September 15 and May 15 each year, but it is not decreed for storage. The seasonal limitation on the use of Bypass Water was eliminated in connection with the CRCA agreements described immediately below. (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement On September 23, 2010, Denver Water and seventeen entities from the West Slope executed the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement (“CRCA”), which resolves various longstanding disputes involving Denver Water’s operations on the West Slope. The CRCA took effect on September 26, 2013. Pursuant to the CRCA and the 2012 Grand County Water Users Operating Plan (“GCWUOP”), Denver Water agreed to make 375 af of water available annually to the Grand County signatories (“Additional Bypass Water”), “upon issuance and acceptance by Denver Water of permits necessary for [Denver Water’s] Moffat Project.” Pursuant to the GCWUOP and the related “Implementation Agreement” between Denver Water and the Town, executed on October 9, 2013, the Town is conditionally entitled to 68.75 af of the Additional Bypass Water. Pursuant to the decree entered on March 15, 2016 in Case No. 11CW152, the Additional Bypass Water may be used for municipal, snowmaking, domestic, commercial, irrigation, recreation, fish and wildlife, and fire protection uses. The Additional Bypass Water may be delivered for diversion to Fraser at the following locations: Gaskill Ditch; Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5; and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. Prior to diverting the Additional Bypass Water through its wells, pursuant to the decree in Case No. 11CW152, Fraser will need to apply for and obtain new well permits to allow for diversion of deliveries of the Additional Bypass Water. iv. Storage – Reservoir No. 2 In Case No. 02CW367, on February 28, 2005, the Grand County Water & Sanitation District (“GCWSD”) decreed GCWSD Reservoir No. 2 (“Reservoir No. 2”) for municipal, irrigation, augmentation, piscatorial, aesthetic, and recreation uses with the right to fill and refill in priority to replace water applied to decreed uses and to replace evaporative losses. The Reservoir No. 2 water right was originally decreed for 80 af, conditional. This reservoir is an off- channel, lined reservoir located southwest of the Fraser River between the Maryvale Wells and the Fraser Wells. On July 31, 2018, the Town acquired from GCWSD No. 1, via deed, 25 af of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and 25 af of the storage capacity in the reservoir. GCWSD No. 1 also conveyed 25 af of the water right and 25 af of the storage capacity to Winter Park Water & Sanitation District (“WPWSD”). In Case No. 18CW3070, 70 af of this water right was decreed absolute for all decreed purposes with 10 af remaining conditional. GCWSD No. 1 owns the remaining 20 af of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and storage capacity. WPWSD, GCWSD, and Fraser executed an operating agreement for Reservoir No. 2 on July 30, 2018. v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation As described above, the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan was decreed in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987. Pursuant to the approved augmentation plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to “storage use for subsequent augmentation release.” Additionally, the plan is approved to provide replacement for out-of-priority depletions caused by the pumping of Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 for domestic, commercial, municipal, and irrigation uses. Fraser continues to investigate options for the construction of an augmentation pond to enable operation of the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Case No. 83CW362, a decreed storage pond for the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water, is required to implement the augmentation plan. B. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE SOUTH SYSTEM The following sections describe the legal water supplies for the South System: i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan The Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation (“Maryvale Augmentation Plan”) was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement between Fraser and Rendezvous Colorado, LLC (“Amended Annexation Agreement”), dated June 23, 2000, the Maryvale Augmentation Plan was conveyed, in large part, to the Town via Bargain and Sale Deed, dated June 23, 2000, and corrected on October 17, 2011 (the “Deed”). Among other rights, the Deed conveyed to Fraser 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right; 20 af of the “Mary’s Pond” storage water right; 32.7 af of storage in augmentation/detention ponds located on Grand Park (the “Detention Reservoirs”); and “all of the benefits and burdens” of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The Maryvale Augmentation Plan provides for augmentation of 16 large capacity wells (1,600 gpm total) and 91 small capacity wells (maximum pumping rate of 15 gpm) to serve 2,822 equivalent residential units (“EQRs”) and irrigate 17 acres. The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the 3.125 cfs Cozens Ditch water right, which was historically used for the irrigation of 125 acres, and changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage. Prior to full build out of the development, the decree contemplates enlargement of the existing Maryvale Reservoir and the construction of up to six of the Detention Reservoirs to store excess historical consumptive use credit water and winter return flows. The 32.7 af of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for full operation of the Augmentation Plan was conveyed to Fraser by the Deed. ii. Wells The South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed , and currently includes four active wells, which supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. See Table 2 (“South System Wells”). These four wells were constructed in the Troublesome Formation, which is considered tributary to the Fraser River. Out-of-priority stream depletions from these wells are fully covered by operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 99CW313, the Court adjudicated three of the 16 proposed large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. These wells are known as Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The maximum cumulative diversions from the Maryvale Well water rights plus the Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 00CW294, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each individual Maryvale Well is 0.5 cfs (225 gpm). Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 are decreed for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, municipal, stockwatering, and fire protection uses. Pursuant to the Deed, 0.78 cfs cumulative of the Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 water rights was conveyed to Fraser for use in Fraser’s municipal water supply system. Maryvale Well No. 1 was decreed absolute for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes in Case No. 08CW192. The remaining conditional amount is 0.31 cfs (139 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes and 0.5 cfs (225 gpm) for industrial, municipal, stock watering, and fire protection purposes. The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make an additional portion of the Maryvale Well No. 1 water right absolute for municipal purposes in the amount of 0.20 cfs That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3020, is pending. (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 00CW294, the Court adjudicated 13 of the 16 large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan in three well fields (“Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1, 2, and 3”). As mentioned above, the maximum cumulative diversions from the Rendezvous Well Field water rights plus the Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 99CW313, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each well within the Rendezvous Well Fields is up to 0.56 cfs (250 gpm). In Case. No. 08CW191, three wells were utilized to make a total of 0.57 cfs (255 gpm) of the Rendezvous Well Field No. 3 water right absolute for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purpose as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.99 cfs (40 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.29 cfs (130 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm). The total amount made absolute to date between all groundwater rights decreed in Case Nos. 99CW313 and 00CW294 is 0.76 cfs (341 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes with a total volume of 96.33 af. The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make additional portions of Maryvale Well Nos. 4, 5, and 7 absolute for municipal use for a total of 0.60 cfs (270 gpm) as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.11 cfs (47.3 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.30 cfs (135.7 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (86.5 gpm). That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3034, is pending. Table 2: South System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Date Adjud. Date Tot. Amt. (cfs) Amt. Abs. (cfs) Amt. Cond. (cfs) Permit No. Maryvale Well No. 1 99CW313 11/17/1999 12/31/2002 0.5 0.18 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.31 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.5 (other uses) 82996-F Maryvale Well No. 2 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 Maryvale Well No. 3 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 Maryvale Well No. 4 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.09 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.47 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83256-F Maryvale Well No. 5 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.29 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.27 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83257-F Maryvale Well No. 7 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.19 (dom., irrig., comm.) .37 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83258-F iii. Surface Water Rights (1) Cozens Ditch The Cozens Ditch water right was decreed on August 1, 1906 in Civil Action No. 112, Grand County District Court in the amount of 3.125 cfs from Vasquez Creek for irrigation. Historically, the Cozens Ditch Water Right was diverted from May through August for the irrigation of approximately 125 acres. As mentioned above, the Cozens Ditch water right was changed in Case No. 98CW41 to be used for augmentation purposes under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By the Deed, 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right was conveyed to the Town. (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension In Case No. 99CW314, on December 31, 2002, the Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were adjudicated in the amounts of 3.1 cfs and 1.5 cfs, respectively, for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, stockwatering, fire prot ection, storage in the Detention Reservoirs, and supplemental irrigation of 125 acres. The Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were decreed to be used in conjunction with the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By decree entered on June 16, 2019 in Case No. 18CW3144, 1.76 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Enlargement water right and 1.5 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Extension water right were made partially absolute for irrigation use. iv. Reservoir/Pond Storage (1) Mary’s Pond A main source of augmentation releases for the South System is the Maryvale Reservoir (aka “Mary’s Pond”), which was decreed in Case No. W-462 on April 10, 1972 for 32.58 af for domestic, recreation, irrigation, and fish culture uses. Mary’s Pond was later decreed for augmentation use in Case No. 86CW258 (superseded by the decree in Case No. 98CW041). The Maryvale Augmentation Plan contemplates a 16 af enlargement of Mary’s Pond and storage of water from the Cozens Ditch in Mary’s Pond for augmentation releases. The Town acquired 20 af of the Mary’s Pond storage water right, via the Deed. On September 4, 2015, Rendezvous/Grand Park and the Town entered into a “Grant of Easement and Augmentation Pond Joint Operations Agreement,” which sets forth the parties’ agreement and respective obligations regarding the joint operation of Mary’s Pond. Express provisions of this agreement anticipate that the Town and Grand Park will enter a similar easement and operations agreement relating to operation by the Town of the Detention Ponds on Grand Park, for augmentation use under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The current active water storage capacity of Mary’s Pond is approximately 14 af. Releases from Mary’s Pond are currently the primary source of augmentation water for out-of- priority depletions associated with operation of the Maryvale Wells. (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights The final decree entered on December 31, 1999 in Case No. 99CW315 adjudicated storage rights for ten detention reservoirs: Maryvale K-1a Reservoir, Maryvale K-1b Reservoir, Maryvale K-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-3 Reservoir, Maryvale E-F Reservoir, MR-1 Reservoir, MR-2 Reservoir, MR-3 Reservoir, and MR-4 Reservoir. The six Maryvale Reservoirs (K-1a, K-1b, K-2, J-2, J-3, and E-F), referred to above as the Detention Reservoirs, are contemplated as augmentation storage sites in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the Detention Reservoirs will be filled during the summer under the Cozens Ditch water right, and excess consumptive use credits and winter return flow water from the Cozens Ditch will be stored in the reservoirs. In the fall and winter, the Detention Reservoirs will be drawn down in order to replace winter stream depletions. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed conditional for irrigation, aesthetic, piscatorial, recreation, municipal, commercial, industrial, and for augmentation and exchange. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed in the cumulative amount of 36 af: K-1a (7.0 af); K-1b (5.0 af); K-2 (10.0 af); J-2 (2.0 af); J-3 (6.0 af); and E-F (6.0 af). Three of the Detention Reservoirs, K-1a, K-1b, and K-2, have been constructed, filled, and put to beneficial use in the following amounts: K-1a (a series of three reservoirs with a total capacity of 3.43 af) and K-1b and K-2 (one combined reservoir with a total capacity of 13.6 af). These three reservoirs are currently operated by Grand Park, but will be operated for augmentation purposes by the Town in the future. The three constructed reservoirs are located in different configurations than originally decreed, and are more than 200 feet from their decreed locations. The decree issued in Case No 08CW194 states: “[p]rior to making any of the subject conditional water rights absolute, Applicants or their successors shall obtain a decree confirming a change of location for any structure that is located at the originally decreed location.” Thus, Grand Park/Rendezvous will need to file an application for change of water rights to reconcile the as-built locations of the reservoirs with the decreed locations before seeking to make the water rights absolute. The Deed conveyed to Fraser 32.7 af of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. C. Other Water Rights i. Decreed Exchanges (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange In Case No. 85CW337, on October 2, 1989, a conditional right of exchange was approved to allow the exchange of Windy Gap water from Granby Reservoir to the nine Fraser Wells, which are the decreed “exchange to” locations. The exchange is decreed for 25 af, conditional. No separate uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for the Fraser Wells (i.e., irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes). The exchange allows diversion from the Fraser Wells, via exchange, when the water rights associated with the Fraser Wells may not otherwise be in priority. (2) Middle Park Exchange In Case No. 90CW235, on June 8, 1995, a conditional right of appropriative exchange was decreed for 80 af. The decreed exchange contemplates the exchange of Middle Park water from Granby Reservoir to various “exchange to” locations that include Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, the Gaskill Ditch, Wells RM-5, RM-6, and RM-7, Detention Reservoirs K-1a, K-1b, K-2, J- 2, J-3, E-F, and Mary’s Pond. Sixty-five af is currently leased to Rendezvous/Grand Park. No separate independent uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for each “exchange to” structure. II. Physical Water Demands and Physical Supply A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR The North System supplies water generally to the “Old Town” Fraser area, and Byers Peak Ranch (pursuant to an out-of-town service agreement) and, temporarily, a portion of the Grand Park development. Table 3 is a current demand table, and includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volume demand estimates for the geographic areas currently served by the North System. In this analysis, Old Town Fraser’s and Byers Peak Ranch’s annual demand per EQR are assumed to be the same. This demand is based on an assumption of 275 gallons per day per EQR. Indoor average annual demand estimate for these areas is 0.308 af/ EQR. Irrigation demand estimates are based on previous Brown & Caldwell water supply planning work for the Town. In the Fraser area, the irrigation season varies from year to year based on monthly temperatures during the “shoulder months” of the irrigation season. The irrigation season is generally considered to begin in May and end in September. Outdoor annual demand for the Old Town Fraser’s and Byers Peak Ranch areas is based on a 500 square foot lawn per EQR and an irrigation application rate of 1.01 af per acre (“ac”). These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.012 af/ EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.320 af/ EQR. The Grand Park indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/ EQR. This value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree in Case No. 98CW41 (which is converted from EQRs as defined in that decree). The irrigation season as defined by the 98CW41 decree is May through September. The Grand Park outdoor annual demand is based on a 250 square foot lawn per EQR with an irrigation application requirement of 1.387 af per ac. These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.008 af/EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 af/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The North System currently serves a total of 962 EQRs, 184 of which are located in in Grand Park. Based on these values and the “af/EQR” values above, the current Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch annual indoor demand is 239.8 af/yr, and the current irrigation demand is 9.0 af/yr. For the Grand Park area currently served by the North System, the current annual indoor demand is 56.7 af/yr and the current irrigation demands is 1.5 af/yr. Thus, the total current North System indoor demand is 296.6 af/yr and the total current irrigation demand is 10.5 af/yr. The total current North System demand is 307.0 af/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The max day demand is a gpm water delivery rate and is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells, or future surface sources, which supply the North System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Max day demand during the irrigation season is 0.312 gpm per EQR. Current max day demand for the 778 EQRs in the Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch areas is 242.9 gpm. Current max day demand for the 184 EQRs located in the Grand Park area currently served by the North System is 56.0 gpm. Thus, the total current max day demand for the North System is 298.8 gpm. B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water Per EQR The Town’s South System supplies water to Rendezvous and Grand Park which comprise a geographic area located within the Town’s municipal boundaries. Table 4 is a current demand table and it includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volumes of water currently required for the areas served by the South System. The South System indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/EQR. This value is taken from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree issued in Case No. 98CW41. This decree also indicates that for purposes of operating the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the irrigation season is May through September and the irrigation demand value is 0.008 af/EQR. The outdoor annual demand in the decree is based on 250 square feet of lawn per EQR and 1.387 af/ac/yr. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 af/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The South system currently serves 465 EQRs. Based on these values and the “af/EQR” values above, the current annual indoor demand is 143.3 af/yr and the current annual irrigation demand is 3.7 af/yr. These values result in a current annual demand for the South System of 147.0 af/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The South System max day demand values are derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The average day indoor demand from the decree is 0.191 gpm/EQR and the average day irrigation demand is 0.012 gpm/EQR. The total average day demand is 0.203 gpm/EQR. The max day demand is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells supplying the South System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Based on the irrigation season average day values and the 1.5 max day factor, the max day indoor demand for the South System is 0.286 gpm/EQR. Based on the current 465 EQR total, the current South System max day demand is 141.4 gpm. C. Current Water Supply for the North System i. Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield The North System’s current water supply is from Fraser River alluvial wells. Table 5 identifies the Fraser Wells and their current average pumping rates during two periods, (1) spring and summer and (2) winter. The Fraser Well locations are shown on Figure 3. The spring and summer wellfield pumping total is 735 gpm and the winter wellfield pumping total is 458 gpm. The difference is due to two wells (3b and 9) being utilized/available seasonally. Table 5 Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates Well Spring & Summer Pumping Rates (gpm) Winter Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 120 120 2 78 78 3b 70 0 5 125 125 7 70 70 8 65 65 9 207 0 Total 735 458 The concept of “safe yield” with respect to the Fraser Well’s includes wellfield production planning, such that the wells are capable of meeting Fraser’s max day demand. One aspect of wellfield planning to achieve this goal is to have an installed wellfield capacity that exceeds the current max day demand. The current safe yield plan is that the Fraser Wells will be equipped with a total production capacity that is 100 gpm greater than the current max day demand. The additional, safe yield, 100 gpm wellfield production capacity allows for well and well equipment maintenance and repairs such that the North System will be able to meet max day demand when one well is not operational. As previously discussed, the current production capacity of the Fraser Wells is 735 gpm in the spring and summer, and 458 gpm in the winter. Table 3 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 399 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Fraser Wells can meet the current max day safe yield demand. In the future, the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System will be served by the South System. When this transition occurs, the Fraser Wells will obtain an additional 58.2 gpm of capacity to meet demands on the North System. This capacity, and additional wellfield improvements, will be required to meet development demands as projected into the future. ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The North System currently relies on seven wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed within the Fraser River alluvium. Table 6 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Fraser Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State’s well permit files, HRS report files, and information from the Town staff. The table includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and recent water level data which was used to estimate saturated aquifer thickness. Static water level data was provided by Town staff for each of the active wells. These water levels were calculated based on measured water depth above the pressure transducer and an assumed transducer depth setting near the pump intake. D. Current Water Supply for the South System i. Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield The current water supply for the South System is from the Maryvale Well, which are completed in the Troublesome Formations. Table 7 lists the Maryvale Wells and their current pumping rates. The Maryvale Wells are numbered 1, 4, 5, and 7. The Maryvale Well locations are shown on Figure 4. As noted in the comments column on Table 8, Well No. 6 is permitted only as a monitoring well. Table 7 Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates Well Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 87 4 43 5 134 7 85 Total 349 The current combined production capacity of the Maryvale Wells is 349 gpm. Table 4 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 241.4 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Maryvale Wells are capable of meeting the current max day safe yield demand. When the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System, are permanently transitioned to the South System, the South System’s safe yield max day demand will be 299.6 gpm (141.4 gpm + 58.2 gpm + 100 gpm). The current combined pumping capacity of 349 gpm for the Maryvale Wells will be sufficient to meet this demand. ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The South System currently relies on four active wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed in the Troublesome Formation which underlies the Fraser River alluvium. Table 8 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Maryvale Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State’s well permit files, HRS report files and information from the Town staff. Table 8 also includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and static water level data which was used to estimate the saturated thickness of the aquifer. Static water level data were taken from well construction reports for each well, as water levels in these wells are not monitored by Town staff. E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the North System The estimated total number of EQRs at buildout for the North System is 4,863 EQRs. The following EQRs are included in the buildout estimate: Old Town Fraser, Byers Peak Ranch, and possible future annexations. Using these categories, the total number of projected, future EQRs is: Old Town Fraser – 1,530 EQRs, Byers Peak Ranch – 1,233 EQRs, and future annexations - 2,100 EQRs. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Table 9 provides the annual volume of water required at buildout for each of the areas listed above. The values shown in Table 9 include: Old Town Fraser 489.4 af/yr, Byers Peak Ranch 394.4 af/yr, and future annexation - 671.7 af/yr. The total annual buildout demand is 1,555.5 af/yr. The values on Table 9 show that the annual irrigation volumes required at buildout are small percentages of the total annual demand. iii. Max Day Demands Table 9 also provides max day and safe yield max day demand estimates in EQRs intervals by area. Safe yield max day demand values are obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 1,577 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 1,677 gpm. The EQR estimates and their corresponding safe yield max day demand pumping rates will be used to help determine and plan for future wells, water supply infrastructure, and water rights acquisitions/strategies that will be required to meet the future North System safe yield max day demands over time. The purpose of Table 10 is to track Fraser wellfield installation, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future North System demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQR for the South System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System The estimated number of EQRs at buildout for the Rendezvous and Grand Park areas, served by the South System, is 2,822 EQRs. This total EQR value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The 2,822 EQR total includes the 184 EQRs currently served by the North System, and 91 EQRs contemplated under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree to be served by small capacity wells. Currently none of the 91 small capacity wells have been constructed and it is not likely any of these wells will be constructed. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation With a total EQR estimate of 2,822 EQRs, and an annual value of 0.316 af/EQR, the total annual demand estimate for the South System is 892.4 af/yr. Of this total, 869.0 af/yr is for indoor demand and 23.4 af/yr is outdoor irrigation demand. iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands The total max day demand estimate during the irrigation season for 2,822 EQRs under the South System is 858.2 gpm. This value is based on an indoor max day value of 0.286 gpm/EQR and an outdoor irrigation demand of 0.018 gpm/EQR. Table 11 provides demand estimates in EQR intervals of approximately 200 EQRs. Safe yield max day demand values were obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 858.2 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 958.2 gpm. The EQR estimates included in Table 11 will be used to help determine and plan for the future wells and water supplies infrastructure that will be required to meet the future demand to be served by the South System. The purpose of Table 12 is to track installation of additional Maryvale Wells, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future wellfield demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. CONCLUSION Current and future water demand and supplies for Fraser’s North and South Systems are discussed and quantified above in the Physical Water Demands and Supply section of this report. Significant conclusions and recommendations from the above discussions and work performed include the following: 1. Fraser’s North and South System wellfields have the capacity to meet current safe-yield max day demands. The Future Demand to Buildout tables and spreadsheets (see Tables 9 through 12) for the North and South Systems are based on incremental EQR increases. The spreadsheets should be used in the Town’s water supply planning to understand the max day water supply requirements of additional EQRs on the Town’s water supply systems. 2. The Town should continue to promote and support water conservation, particularly during the irrigation season. 3. Water supplies for additional development beyond the current demands should be in place at least three months before the water is needed. This recommendation may require that water supply development work begin no later than two years before the water may be needed. 4. If Water Court applications are required to obtain new water rights or to change the Town’s current water rights, this work should begin no later than three years before the water is needed. 5. The Town should continue to monitor and record all well pumping and water level data (both static and pumping levels). 6. Regular review of the water well production and water level data will be important to determine when pumping equipment and well maintenance should be performed. Pumping equipment should be removed from wells and inspected at approximately five-year intervals. At this time a video survey of the well should be performed and appropriate well rehabilitation work completed. 7. The onsite water supply potential should be evaluated for any new annexation area. 8. The Town’s current augmentation storage is sufficient for its current water supply demand. Additional augmentation storage will be necessary to meet future legal and physical water supply requirements. 9. Accounting for both the North and South Systems should continue to be updated on a monthly basis, and the Town should continue to work with the Colorado Department of Water Resources staff with respect to water rights accounting matters. 10. The Town’s St. Louis Creek and Elk Creek surface water rights continue to be important components of the Town’s future water supplies and planning efforts. 11. The Town should continue to evaluate possible water rights/storage acquisitions that may arise in the future, to provide additional certainty and protection against increasing demands and changing legal and climatological circumstances. 12. The Town should continue incrementally perfecting its conditional water rights through the diligence and Water Court process. The Town should vigilantly protect its legal water supplies by monitoring and prudently participating in Water Court proceedings potentially impacting the Town’s water rights. 13. The Town should continue to be an active participant in all existing and future water related agreements with third-parties, and proactively steer its water supply development activities to maximize the benefits of those agreements (e.g., the Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement, the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement). Glossary of Terms • Ac = Acre = 1 Ac = 43,560 Square Feet • Af = Acre-Feet = 1 Af = 325,851 gallons • Avg = Arithmetic Average • Af/Ac/Yr = Acre-Feet per Acre per Year • Af/EQR = Acre-Feet per Equivalent Residential Unit • Af/Yr = Acre-Feet per Year • CFS = Cubic Feet Per Second = 1 cfs = 448.8 GPM and 1 CFS/day = 1.9835 acre- feet • EQR = Equivalent Residential Unit - 1 EQR is typically considered to equate to full- time occupancy for an average of 2.75 people. EQRs are reduced for multi-family and commercial units. 1 EQR has a water demand of 275 gallons/day. • Ft = Feet • Gal = Gallon of Water • GPM = Gallons Per Minute • GPM/EQR = Gallons Per Minute/Equivalent Residential Unit • Hp = Horse Power • Q = Well Pumping Discharge Rate • WTP = Water Treatment Plant • WY = Water Year (November 1 – October 31) Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Annual Current Annual Volume Average Day Average Annual Pumping Rate Max Day Demand Current Max Day Demand (af/EQR)(af/yr)(gpm/EQR)(gpm)(gpm/EQR)(gpm) Fraser Annual Indoor Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 239.8 0.191 148.6 Fraser Annual Irrigation Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.012 9.0 0.017 13.3 Fraser Annual Total Irrigation Season Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.320 248.9 0.208 161.9 0.312 242.9 Byers Peak Ranch Annual Indoor Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 0 0.0 Byers Peak Ranch Annual Irrigation Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.012 0 0.0 Byers Peak Ranch Annual Total Irrigation Season Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.320 0 0.240 0.0 0.360 0.0 Grand Park Annual Indoor Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 56.7 0.191 35.1 Grand Park Annual Irrigation Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.008 1.5 0.012 2.2 Grand Park Annual Total Irrigation Season Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.316 58.2 0.203 37.3 0.304 56.0 Totals 307.0 199.2 298.8 Fraser EQRs Byers Peak Ranch EQRs 1 Grand Park EQRs Blue Zone Total EQRs Total Max Day Demand Wellfield "Safe Yield" Production (gpm)(gpm) Current - 2020 778 0 184 962 299 399 1 The 184 EQRs currently served by the North System will be served by the South System in the near future. Table 3 Current North System Demands Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Annual Annual Volume Average Day Average Annual Pumping Rate Max Day Max Day Demand (af/EQR)(af/yr)(gpm/EQR)(gpm)(gpm/EQR)(gpm) Grand Park/Rendezvous Annual Indoor Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 143.3 0.191 88.8 0.286 133.2 Grand Park/Rendezvous Annual Irrigation Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.008 3.7 0.012 5.5 0.018 8.2 Grand Park/Rendezvous Annual Total Irrigation Season Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.316 147.0 0.203 94.3 0.304 141.4 Maryvale EQRs Total Max Day Demand Wellfield "Safe Yield" Production (gpm)(gpm) Current - 2020 465 141.4 241.4 Table 4 Current South System Demand Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Table 6 North System Wellfield - Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Information Decreed Well No.Date Completed Permit No.Decreed Location Drilling Method Formation Completion Total Depth (Ft) Screened Interval (Ft) Screen Diameter (In) Grout Interval (Ft) Static Water Level (Ft) Depth to Bedrock (Ft) Saturated Thickness (Ft) Pumping Status Pump Type & Pump HP Pump Intake Level (Ft) Permitted Pumping Rate (GPM) Test Pumping Rate-Q (GPM) Current Pumping Rate-Q (GPM) Comments Fraser Well No. 1 3/18/82 32203-F SE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W Air Rotary Fraser River Alluvium 113 77-110 8 0-15 14 113 99 Active Submersible/7 .5hp 79 150 106 120 Original static water level was reported as flowing (artesian) indicating confined conditions. 1st well drilled to 135' collapsed and a 2nd well was constructed to 113' . Need to verify Pump Intake Depth. Fraser Well No. 2 8/20/82 32204-F NE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W Air Rotary Fraser River Alluvium 110 76-106 8.5/8 0-17 8.2 113 104.8 Active Submersible/4 .5hp 78.2 110 110 78 Original static water level was reported as flowing (artesian) indicating confined conditions. Replacement Permit 32204-FR issued but well never drilled. Rehab work included new inner casing. Replacement permit 32204-FR max pumping rate is 200 gpm Fraser Well No. 3a 7/28/83 32205-F SE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W Cable Tool Fraser Alluvium/ Troublesome 180 50-70, 117- 122, 147- 165 8 0-20 NA 110 NA Inactive NA 90 100 60 NA 32205-F, Flowing at time of construction. Application later denied (no info available from SEO). Possible sewer setback issue? Fraser Well No. 3b 7/28/83 32206-F SE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W Cable Tool Fraser River Alluvium 115 69.5-105 8 0-47 19 104 85 Active Submersible/7 .5hp 87.5 150 70 70 Original static water level was reported as flowing (artesian) indicating confined conditions. Fraser Well No. 4 6/17/83 32207-F SE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W Cable Tool Fraser River Alluvium 110 52-62, 72- 77, 87-102 8 0-12 ?105 ? MW None NA 200 20 NA Monitoring Well, Permit No. 65014-F issued as a replacement for 32207-F Fraser Well No. 5 11/14/06 66896-F NE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W Air Hammer Fraser River Alluvium 173 88-153, 153- 163 8.5/8 10-81 2.5 163 160.5 Active Submersible/7 .5hp 142 200 120.6 125 Flowing (artesian) at time of construction. Original permit 32208-F, redrilled under permit no. 66896-F. Fraser Well No. 7 11/10/86 34809-F NE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W unknown Fraser River Alluvium 47 30-42 5 0-10 2.5 42 39.5 Active Submersible/3 hp 35 150 98 70 On-line, part of current system. Jan 4, 2018 SEO recognized permit as valid and accepted form 68 as evidence of well construction/pump installation. Fraser Well No. 8 11/3/86 34810-F NE1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W unknown Fraser River Alluvium 122 90-112 5 0-10 1.7 115 113.3 Active Submersible/3 hp 90 150 59/84 65 Jan 4, 2018 SEO recognized permit as valid and accepted form 68 as evidence of well construction/pump installation. Received CDPHE approval to pump in August 2019. Variable frequency drive installed in Fall 2019. Fraser Well No. 9 10/23/86 34811-F NW1/4 NE1/4 Section 19, T1S, R75W unknown Fraser River Alluvium 53 26-48 8.5/8 unknown 7 52 45 Active Submersible/7 .5hp 32 200 95 207 Online as of July 2005 with approval from CDPHE. Jan 4, 2018 SEO recognized permit as valid and accepted form 68 as evidence of well construction/pump installation. Static Water Levels are an average of 12/21/18 and 6/18/19 readings, based on depth of water above transducer and assumption that transducer is set near pump intake. Note: Well 3b and Well 9 only operate in the spring and summer months. Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Table 8 South System Wellfield - Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Details Decreed Well No.Date Completed Permit No. Location 00CW0294 Decreed Well Field Drilling Method Formation Completion Total Depth (Ft) Screened Interval (Ft) Screen Diameter (In) Grout Interval (Ft) Static Water Level (Ft) Depth to Bedrock (Ft) Saturated Thickness (Ft) Pumping Status Pump Type & Pump HP Pump Intake Level (Ft) Permitted Pumping Rate (GPM) Test Pumping Rate-Q (GPM) Current Pumping Rate-Q (GPM) Comments Maryvale Well No.1 12/6/01 82996-F SE1/4 NW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 3 Cable Tool and Air Rotary Troublesome Formation 282 70 - 270 8.5 13 - 68 14.6 40 242 Active Submersible/3 hp 168 250 90 87 Confined aquifer. Repermitted March 2019 to expand the permitted uses. Maryvale Well No.2 NE1/4 NE1/4 Section 29, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 2 Inactive NA Not Constructed Maryvale Well No.3 29733-MH SW1/4 SE1/4 Section 20, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 2 Troublesome Formation Inactive NA Constructed under monitoring well notice. Maryvale Well No.4 12/6/01 83256-F SE1/4 NW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 3 Cable Tool and Air Rotary Troublesome Formation 200 75 - 90, 130 - 132, 168 - 170, 185 - 190 8.5/8 13 - 65 12.1 35 165 Active Submersible/3 hp 168 250 41 43 Confined aquifer. Recently repermitted to expand the permitted uses. Maryvale Well No. 5 12/6/01 83257-F SE1/4 NW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 3 Cable Tool and Air Rotary Troublesome Formation 276 50.6 - 250.6 8.5 13 - 50.6 11.6 39 236 Active Submersible/7 .5 hp 168 250 125 134 Confined aquifer. Recently repermitted to expand the permitted uses. Maryvale Well No.6 3/6/00 53750-FR SE1/4 NW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 3 Troublesome Formation 192 Inactive NA Constructed under MH Notice 37688 and permitted for monitoring purpose under permit no. 229426 Maryvale Well No. 7 2/2/01 83258-F NW1/4 NW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 3 Cable Tool and Air Rotary Troublesome Formation 280 29.9 - 229.9 6.5 13 - 28 2 18 262 Active Submersible/5 hp 168 250 88 85 Confined aquifer. Recently repermitted to expand the permitted uses. Maryvale Well No.8 230032 SW1/4 SW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 2 Inactive NA No evidence of construction. Permitted as a monitoring well. Maryvale Well No.9 230033 SW1/4 NW1/4 Section 28, T1S, R75W Well Field No. 2 Inactive NA No evidence of construction. Permitted as a monitoring well. Maryvale Well No.10 230034 NE1/4 NE1/4 Section 29, T1S, R75W Closest to Well Field No. 1 Inactive NA No evidence of construction. Permitted as a monitoring well. Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Annual Annual Volume Average Day Annual Pumping Rate Max Day Max Day Demand (af/EQR)(af/yr)(gpm/EQR)(gpm)(gpm/EQR)(gpm) Fraser Annual Indoor Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 471.7 0.191 292.2 Fraser Annual Irrigation Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.012 17.7 0.017 26.2 Fraser Annual Total Irrigation Season Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.320 489.4 0.208 318.4 0.312 477.6 Byers Peak Ranch Annual Indoor Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 380.1 0.220 271.5 Byers Peak Ranch Annual Irrigation Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.012 14.3 0.020 24.4 Byers Peak Ranch Annual Total Irrigation Season Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.320 394.4 0.240 295.9 0.360 443.9 Grand Park Annual Indoor Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 0.0 0.191 0.0 Grand Park Annual Irrigation Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.008 0.0 0.012 0.0 Grand Park Annual Total Irrigation Season Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.316 0.0 0.203 0.0 0.304 0.0 Future Annexation Developments Annual Indoor Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 647.4 0.191 401.0 Future Annexation Developments Annual Irrigation Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.012 24.3 0.017 36.0 Future Annexation Developments Annual Total Irrigation Season Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.320 671.7 0.208 437.0 0.312 655.6 Totals 1,555.5 1,051.4 1,577.1 Fraser EQRs Current Well Production (Summer Season) Byers Peak Ranch EQRs * Grand Park EQRs Future Annexation Development EQRs Total EQRs Change in Total EQRs Total Max Day Demand Change in Total Max Day Demand Wellfield "Safe Yield" Production Required Fraser Wellfield Action Additional Infrastructure Requirements Additional Wellfield Pumping Fraser Wellfield Production (gpm)(gpm)(gpm)(gpm)(gpm)(gpm) Current - 2020 778 735 0 184 0 962 299 399 778 735 0 0 778 243 -56 343 600 1,053 275 335 92 435 WTP Expansion 878 250 0 200 1,328 275 427 92 527 1,553 225 503 76 603 978 500 0 300 1,778 225 579 76 679 2,003 225 655 76 755 1,078 750 0 400 2,228 225 731 76 831 2,453 225 808 76 908 1,178 1,000 0 500 2,678 225 884 76 984 2,828 150 933 49 1,033 * Current Legal Supply Limit 1,278 1,100 0 600 2,978 150 982 49 1,082 3,145 167 1,037 55 1,137 1,378 1,233 0 700 3,311 167 1,093 55 1,193 3,561 250 1,171 78 1,271 1,478 1,233 0 1100 3,811 250 1,249 78 1,349 4,037 226 1,319 71 1,419 1,530 1,233 0 1500 4,263 226 1,390 71 1,490 4,463 200 1,452 62 1,552 1,530 1,233 0 1900 4,663 200 1,515 62 1,615 Estimated Buildout 1,530 1,233 0 2100 4,863 200 1,577 62 1,677 * 184 EQRs currently served by North System will be served by South System in near future 2100 is based on 140 ac x 15 EQR/ac North System - Future Demand to Buildout Table 9 Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Table 10 North System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Current Pumping Rate Additional Pumping Rate Max Day Demand (gpm) 435 435 527 527 603 603 679 679 755 755 831 831 908 908 Totals Well (gpm) (gpm) Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate Work Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 120 $0 2 78 Rehab.$0 3b 70 Rehab.$0 5R 125 $0 7 70 $0 8 65 $0 9 207 $0 Total Pumping Rates 735 Test Hole Drilling and Wellfield Analysis Subtotal Contingency 40% Total 735 Contingency includes - hydrogeology, engineering, surveying, legal, and easements. Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Table 11 South System - Future Demand to Buildout Annual Annual Volume Average Day Annual Pumping Rate Max Day Max Day Demand (af/EQR)(af/yr)(gpm/EQR)(gpm)(gpm/EQR)(gpm) Indoor Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.308 869.0 0.191 538.3 0.286 808.4 Municipal Lawn and Open Space Irrigation Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.008 23.4 0.012 34.6 0.018 49.8 Total Irrigation Season Buildout Demand (af/yr)/(gpm)0.316 892.4 0.203 572.9 0.304 858.2 Total decreed EQRs in 98CW041 =2,822 Total municipal wellfield EQRs =2,822 Total small capacity wellfield EQRs and volume =91 28.78 af/yr Year Grand Park & Rendezvous EQRs Current Well Production Change in EQRs Total Max Day Demand Change in Total Max Day Demand Wellfield "Safe Yield" Production Required Wellfield Action Additional Wellfield Pumping Maryvale Wellfield Production (gpm)(gpm)(gpm)(gpm)(gpm)(gpm) Current - 2020 465 349 141 241 661 196 201 60 301 858 196 261 60 361 1,054 196 321 60 421 1,251 196 380 60 480 1,447 196 440 60 540 1,643 196 500 60 600 1,840 196 560 60 660 2,036 196 619 60 719 2,233 196 679 60 779 2,429 196 739 60 839 2,625 196 798 60 898 Buildout 2,822 197 858 60 958 Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Report HRS Water Consultants, Inc. June 2020 Table 12 South System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Current Pumping Rate Additional Pumping Rate Max Day Demand (gpm) 301 301 361 361 421 421 480 480 540 540 600 600 660 660 719 719 779 779 839 839 898 898 958 958 Totals Well (gpm) (gpm) Preliminary Cost Estimate 1 87 $0 4 43 $0 5 134 $0 7 85 $0 Total Pumping Rates 349