The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutTBP 2021-11-03 '17 0 1, 0 IR A Six Wr Board of Trustees Workshop and Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday November 3, 2021 6:00 PM- 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnl7d-kkOi 1 cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Information https://us02web.zoom.us/i/2590408013 Meeting ID:259 040 8013 Phone 1 -346-248-7799 1. Workshop - 2022 Budget - Ed Documents: [)[RAF1 11&F 2022 pdf 2. 7:00 Ire. Roll Call I Approval Of Agenda 4. Consent Agenda a. Minutes October 20, 2021 Documents: �B:M ,f 021-1() 20 IPdf 5. Discussion And Possible Action Regarding a. Resolution 2021-11-01 Amended Final Pland And Preliminary Plat, The Willows Apartments Documents: The Mhas Apmbiner-Oz IPIIarneir IIIrtlefiirg 1() ','27 2()21 [1dif ResduHan 2021-1111 41 GP VOM FPDP AHmndrnen! And P%mMy RaLpdf REVISED FPDPV121NMI FIdif PC; Resdidan 20210401 CwrexkV Ile ANAMn Fm AppwvN Of A FPDP And Pmkninary 1,1at VWk,';oon;' Apts.pdf 2005112709 Chand Padk PDEQ11: Pro�eci Nun N'.,.'dii\/E^,q:)df F:nnal IFIair� VWIews Pre=wy PWL18130 VWkms PHASE 1,4121 Pdf Pre=wy PWL18130 VWkms PHASE 2,4121 Pdf 11...1::;F` 1JDW .. fflIews Apa%W Sewnd CommmMs pdf WHkow Apartrnents My ReAmxMeu1KWpW VVlIcw A1paOrnen4..; Dmina¢,Ve Revffievv 2021-0707,RJI: Ageincy I:Revtlevv Attorney PUNK CommmVpdf 2V\/ 11 fp C;enerafion I OJea 030821 [.1dif 24;11;14 IRI[,�:N[:)EZVO1111NTP�-'e("" 11 (,'.,'�V 1 11 KIE I ette� 11,2021 06-10 1,1a11: (,'.,'�V 1 11 KIE I ette� 11,2021 03-10 1,1a11: R,',,rraciina 1 2021 05-19.Fldf R,',,rracina 1 2021 Proof Of 6. Discussion And Possible Action Regarding a. First Amendment To Economic Inducements And Incentives For Watt Investment LLP - Ed Documents: SWK Wmo For WaH =MWe EMemim1dif FoWattk kwestirn(..'^W III P Ea',oInoaflc Ea')Inoirnk krna.;(..'^nfive Agreemerfl:Watts I II Fl.pdf b. Ordinance 485 Water Wastewater Advisory Committee Documents: Ckdhance Nak 485 VVNnr And Wastewate� Ad0sor,/ pdf 7. Open Forum a) Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on We agenda please contact the Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh at 970-726-5491 ext. 201) 8. Updates 9. Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2021 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Board Staff Direct: Define the service, product or value Lead: Future focused planning to be delivered Protect: Establish the operational Manage: Now focused policy and procedural boundaries to be respected by Staff and guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on monitored by the Board target service delivery I Enable:Advocacy, resource development, Accomplish: Ensure the work defined by the and role discipline I direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget GENERALFUND REVENUE TAXES 10-31-100 General Fund Property Tax 334,794 350,000 ' , IIIIII 350,000 575,735 m u� R!VIIIIIII 25,000 12,000 10-31-200 Specific Ownership Tax 24,947 12,000 iiuuuuuuuuuuu ii 10-31-300 Motor Vehicle Tax 0 4,500 VIII III 500 500 10-31-400 Town Sales Tax 3,746,914 2 ,750 000 3500,000 3,200,0002r 10-31-410 Use Tax-Building Materials 171,598 100,000 ', � 6iiiiii' 575,000 250,000 10-31-420 Use Tax-Motor Vehicle Sales 154,760 65,000EUI111 160,000 140,000 uu �fu uuuulu g °° IIIIII 10-31-430 State Cigarette Tax 6,905 3,200 � 3,500 3,000 10-31-800 Franchise Fees 69,491 55,000 iiiuuuuuuuuuu uuuiiiiiiii' ° """' 150,000 60,000 Sub-Total 4,509,409 3,339,700 3,868,311 4,764,000 4,241,235 LICENSES&PERMITS 10-32-100 Business License Fees 15,783 15,000 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiil "I ?""' 15,500 15,000 . 10-32-110 Regulated Industry Fees/Taxes 237,718 120,000 1111111 I" ,,,,! 250,000 200,000 Sub-Total 253,501 135,000 221,480 265,500 215,000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 10-33-100 Grants 640,973 0IIIIIII ? �6lu !4' 225,000 221,645 Sub-Total 640,973 0 206,545 225,000 221,645 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 10-34-100 Annexation Fees 0 1,000 ' iiiiii 1,000 1,000 10-34-110 Zoning Fees 0 1,500 iiii 1,500 1,500 10-34-120 Subdivision Fees 5,950 1,500 1111111 °° 30 000 1 500 111100000000 10-34-130 Miscellaneous Planning Fees 80 11000 iiiiiI'',iii 1,000 1,000 10-34-150 Affordable Housing Impact Fee 0 0 0 0 10-34-300 PAYT 72,557 35,000Iuui 65,000 70,000 10-34-600 Distribution 62,074 O 1111111 162,717 182,000 10-34-740 Fees in Lieu of Park Land 0 0 0 0 10-34-750 WTHP Revenue 0 0 !!!!!II 0 0 Sub-Total 140,661 40,000 85,652 261,217 257,000 FINES&FORFEITURES 10-35-100 Court Fines 0 0II' iufi 0 0 III 10-35-200 Police Dept.Sur-Charge 0 0 1111111 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 10-36-100 Interest Earnings 32,375 35,000 °�IIDIUI """' 6 000 4 500 g , 10-36-300 Rental Income 10,385 12,000 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiuuuui ,� ! 10,000 10,000 10-36-500 Sale of General Fixed Assets 0 0 1111111 iiii 0 0 I �� 1111111 10-36-600 Community Housing 16,650 15,000 IIIIIIIIIIIII II !!!!! 18,500 15,000 10-36-610 Reimbursable-Prof Services 53,478 50,000 1111111 �ll�lli' I !' 50,000 100,000 I lll�uuuuuiiiipi uuu 10-36-620 Reimbursable-Night Shuttle 0 0 "'liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 0 0 gpuuuuuuuuuumuuuuuuugipu " 10-36-630 Disposable Bag Fees 18,478 10,000 i ! 35,000 25,000 ' 10-36-900 Miscellaneous Revenue 70,723 30,500 viii uiiuuiiii2 48,000 30,000 uu uuuuuuuuuuuuuu Sub-Total 202,088 152,500 132,615 167,500 184,500 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 10-37-100 Byers Vista SID 0 0 1111111 iii°I 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 OTHER SOURCES AND TRANSFERS 10-39-100 Bond Proceeds 0 0 iiiuuu uuuuuiiiii6119 0 0 10-39-900 Transfers in from Other Funds 0 0 0 0 10-39-920 Transfer in from GF Reserves 0 6,379 IIII 0 6,379 10-39-940 Transfer in from WF Reserves 0 0 1111111 °gillld 0 0 10-39-960 Transfer in from WWF Reserves 0 0 1111111 4UU' 0 0 10-39-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 2,055,683 2,508,918 1111111 ° Iir+�!!„° 4,172,073 3,634,737 Page 1 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget Sub-Total 2,055,683 2,515,297 4,172,073 4,172,073 3,641,116 GENERAL FUND"NEW" REVENUES 5,746,632 3,667,200 4,514,703 5,683,217 5,119,380 GENERAL FUND TOTAL REVENUE 7,802,315 6,182,497 8,686,776 9,855,290 8,760,496 EXPENDITURES TOWN BOARD 10-41-110 Salaries 37,120 35,000 �ml ' ! ! 35,000 35,000 10-41-220 FICA Tax 2,279 3,825 °11"'Illl IIiIil 3,825 2,678 10-41-280 Training Programs 110 0IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII °1IIllIlIll!VIII ,000 6,000 10-41-290 TravelMealsa d Lodging 1,770 5,500 5,500 6,000 10-41-295 Meals and Entertainment 4,865 10,000 IIIIIIIII141i;1 5,000 10,000 10-41-690 Miscellaneous Expense 7,935 10,500 IIIIIIIII 15,000 20,000 g "IIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiii 10-41-860 Grants and Aid to Agencies 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 10-41-861 Intergovernmental Agreements 4,500 5,000 III°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°ulllllllll°°ul °°°°°°°I !!!9 5,000 5,250 10-41-862 Fraser/Winter Park Police Dept 619,683 650,000 (IIIIIIINI�yll'lI'I'I'I'I'I 650,000 682,500 10-41-863 Street Lighting and Signals 15,342 22,750 lllll��llulll3ilulllJJilIlI41111iili 22,750 23,000 10-41-864 Special Events 13,857 15,000 VIII �ll�uuuuulliiiii 20,000 20,000 10-41-865 Grand County Dispatch 0 0 IIIIIII "!!!!; 0 0 10-41-866 Wood Stove Rebates 0 0 IIIIIII °11116 0 0 10-41-867 Chamber of Commerce-IGA 0 0 Ilii °I!Illlj, 0 0 10-41-868 Winter Shuttle-IGA 0 0 0 0 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiuuuuuuuuui !k 10-41-869 Summer Shuttle-IGA 0 0 I;; 0 0 10-41-870 Business Dist StreetScape 4,800 5,000 IIIIIIIII hill°Ipliiiliilllilililil'i 4,000 5,000 I �uuuuuuuuuuullllp, 10-41-871 Business Enhancement Programs 181,513 82,500 iiiuui � ' !!!!!' 150,000 82,500 10-41-872 Sustainability4,955 15,000 III VIII �34V�11 5,000 10,000 ii 10-41-873 Recycle Facility 63,193 50,000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllq! „ I7"6'' 70,000 60,000 10-41-874 Community Housing 50,000 750,000 Illlh 155,000 750,000 g I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II 3 6,! 25,000 25,000 10-41-875 Marketing 11 660 25 000 uuupl„I„I iiip 10-41-880 Center for Creative Arts 0 0 IIIIIII llllh 0 0 10-41-885 Economic Incentives 31,788 0IIIIIII IIIIIII 0 0 Sub-Total 1,055,371 1,696,075 700,790 1,182,075 1,747,928 ADMINISTRATION 10-45-110 Salaries 347,230 500,000 kiVllllll 500,000 471,545 10-45-210 Health Insurance 76,219 90,000 85,000 88,663 10-45-220 FICA Tax 24,806 32,000 Illuuuuuuu uuuuuuuiiiiilliiilu3llllll 38,250 36,073 10-45-230 Retirement 16,280 20,000 III iiiii 30,000 47,155 10-45-250 Unemployment Tax 1,048 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,415 10-45-260 Workers Comp Claims 0 0 "'u'"ilio 0 0 uu IIIIIV 10-45-280 Training Programs 7,126 8,000 Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll§�llllllllllllll 8,000 6,000 10-45-290 Travel, Meals and Lodging 1,556 10,000 75u""' 20,000 7,000 10-45-295 Meals and Entertainment 2,781 6,000 IIIIIII '; ',' ( ""' 6,000 6,000 10-45-305 Municipal Court Judge 0 0 !i 0 0 IIIIIII 10-45-310 Legal Fees 85,758 175,000IIIIII 225,000 175,000 10-45-320 Audit Fees 20,604 18,200 20,604 24,000 10-45-330 Engineering Fees 0 3,500 iiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuliiiiiiiiiuuuuuuluuull !!!!!! 3,500 4,000 10-45-360 Computers-Networks and Support 57,457 90,000 6kIIIIII 90,000 90,000 10-45-370 Other Professional Services 38,767 90,000 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuliiiiiiiiiulrly13 ""'' 60,000 210,000 10-45-375 Reimbursable Prof Services 25,269 50,000 ! 50,000 100,000 10-45-380 Janitorial Services 11,989 15,91$ 198I'I' 15,918 16,561 �ll Illuuuuuiiiiii "I_.I 10-45-385 Treasurer's Fees 6,696 7,725 0 7,725 10,815 10-45-390 Abatement Fees 0 0 W 0 0 10-45-395 Recording Fees 2,000 1,500II"111111 1,500 1,500 Page 2 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 10-45-410 Bank Charges 8,397 8,000 IjS !!!!!I 8,000 8,000 10-45-420 Elections 829 5,000 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuul !!!!! 0 5,000 10-45-430 Insurance-All Departments 82,870 75,000 75,000 75,000 10-45-440 Advertising 2,764 2,500 ; ;;;9 2,500 2,500 10-45-490 Professional Memberships 10,797 12,000 11111 12,000 11,000 10-45-500 Operating Supplies 12,973 15,435 1111111IV4IIIIII 12,000 12,000 uuu duuuuuuuuuuuuuu 10-45-510 Equipment Purchase and Repair 4,250 10 10-45-550 Postage 2,156 2,5001II � 11111111 3,000 5,000 000 2,500 2,500 10-45-560 Utilities-Telephone 8,556 7,500 1111111 ' ' ' 7,500 7,575 10-45-561 Utilities-Natural Gas 2,704 3,500 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ';1 ' VIIIIII 3,500 3,700 10-45-562 Utilities-Electricity 7,030 6,400 I, 10,000 10,000 10-45-569 Utilities-Trash Removal 0 0 1111111 iiiii, 0 0 10-45-670 Prop Mgmt-107 Eisenhower Dr 13,509 20,000 1111111 mid' 30,000 70,000 10-45-671 Prop Mgmt mt-105 Fraser Ave 826 5001 900 20,000 10-45-672 Prop Mgmt- 0 0 iiih, 0 0 10-45-673 Prop Mgmt-153 Fraser Ave 57,845 60,000lliuliu6iiiiii 15,000 95,000 10-45-674 Prop Mgmt-200 Eisenhower Dr 1,035 500 1111111 dlll9; 500 1,000 10-45-675 Prop Mgmt-216 Eisenhower Dr 0 0 iiiiiili iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 0 0 10-45-676 Prop Mgmt-400 Doc Susie Ave 0 0 1111111 IIID 0 0 10-45-690 Miscellaneous Expense 20,952 20,000 iiiuuuuuu j � llllll 20,000 20,000 10-45-695 Bad Debt Write-Off 540 0 „jjj ;;;;!; 0 0 10-45-730 Capital Projects 0 0 Illllllllllli 0 0 10-45-740 Capital Purchases 0 0 1111111 0 0 10-45-810 Lease/Purchase-Principal 0 0 'I 0 0 10-45-820 Lease/Purchase-Interest 0 0 0 0 1I1I1I1I1I1I 111111111 10-45-830 Loan-Principal 703 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiu 8 llllllll2lll iim 42,000 5,000 uuuuuuul�uuuuuuuuuuuiiiip 10-45-840 Loan-Interest 74 0 liiiuuuuuuuuuu 200 100 III uuuli ""° Sub-Total 954,394 1,367,878 11,195,040 1,407,597 1,649,102 PUBLIC WORKS 10-60-110 Salaries 665,360 735,000 ' D ' !!!!! 550,000 827,050 10-60-210 Health Insurance 176,569 215,000 jID !"" 201,000 233,831 10-60-220 FICA Tax 46,691 58,000 iiip iiiiiiiii !!!!!I, 42,075 63,269 10-60-230 Retirement 26,413 33,000 33,000 74,958 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillilI 10-60-250 Unemployment Tax 2,012 2,3501111111 F�I1 1,650 2,481 10-60-260 Workers Comp Claims 0 01111111IIIIII 0 0 10-60-280 Training Programs 7,510 3,500 �IIIIIII 3,500 3,000 10-60-290 Travel, Meals and Lodging 391 2,500 2,500 3,000 P 10-60-295 Meals and Entertainment 717 1,500 iiillll11111 1,500 1,500 10-60-330 Engineering Fees 92,446 50,000I!! I,,,! 50,000 50,000 10-60-360 Computer Network Support 27,450 33,0751111111 40,000 50,000 IIIIIIIIIII � Ilkuuuuuuw6wrrrr 10-60-370 Other Professional Services 9,281 90,000 IIVlulll 1, 90,000 50,000 10-60-380 Janitorial Services 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum 'iiiii 0 0 10-60-470 Contract Grounds Maintenance 0 0 l iiiii 0 0 10-60-475 Contract Snow Removal 0 0 jjjj;„ iiiii 0 0 10-60-480 Equipment Rental 1,403 2,500 IIII '4110 I 5,000 2,500 10-60-490 Professional Memberships 786 1,000 uii uiiiiiiiilllIIIIII 2,500 1,000 10-60-500 Operating Supplies 89,959 90,000 90,000 94,000 10-60-506 Plants/Planter Supplies 27,279 70,000 ', Ip88llllll 26,333 75,000 10-60-510 Equipment Purchase and Repair 84,074 75,000 1111111a ?"" 75,000 75,000 10-60-560 Utilities-Telephone 4,550 4,000 !y'3'45""' 4,000 4,080 10-60-561 Utilities-Natural Gas 3,929 5,000 !!!1111VVIIIIII 5,000 8,000 uuuuuugiiiiiiipuu I� r 10-60-562 Utilities-Electricity 0 0 iiillll ")IIIb 0 0 10-60-569 Utilities 10-60-670 Prop Mgmt a 2S FraserlAve 5,970 7,500 18(((((( 10,000 32,500 10-60-671 Prop Mgmt-Clayton Ct Parcel 0 0 1111111 0 0 Page 3 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 10-60-672 Prop Mgmt-Elk Crk Wetlands 0 0 III III;!; 0 0 10-60-673 Prop Mgmt-Fraser River Trail 2,526 10,000 5 9iiiiii 10,000 160,000 10-60-674 Prop Mgmt-Hwy 40 Pedestrian 295 6,000 1111111iiii 6,000 6,000 10-60-675 Prop Mgmt-Koppers Park 0 1,500 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuui !!!!4 1,500 1,500 10-60-676 Prop Mgmt-Old SchlHouse Pk 433 5,000 liiiiii 33' Vllllll 1,500 76,500 10-60-677 Prop Mgmt-Planning Area 28 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiiii ' 0 0 10-60-678 Prop Mgmt-OutdoorActivityCtr 9170 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiii'iiuuuuu m 0 0 10-60-679 Prop Mgmt-School Bus Garage 6,630 5,0001111111 II511J 111,111,1 6,500 26,500 10-60-680 Prop Mgmt-Gardner Shed 0 0 III i!!!! 150 5,000 10-60-681 Prop Mgmt-Cozens Ranch Park 19,512 15,000 'IIIi82 ;;;; 15,000 15,000 10-60-682 Prop Mgmt-Amtrak Station 2,199 0 liiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu6119 0 0 10-60-683 Prop Mgmt-Ptarmigan OS 0 0 1111111 iiiii, 0 0 10-60-684 Prop Mgmt-FRODO 0 5,000 ; 1""'! 60,000 40,000 10-60-685 Prop Mgmt-Mtn Man Park 640 500 IIllll� 500 500 10-60-686 Goranson Station 127 500 1111111 ijiiii 500 750 10-60-687 Prop Mgmt-6 W 321 5,000 ""' 5,000 50,000 10-60-690 Miscellaneous Expense 6,935 81000 Ijlllll iI!I!I!I!I!I 12,000 10,000 10-60-695 Fraser Mustang 00 flllllll 0 0 10-60-725 Street Improvements 0 0 1111111 P 0 250,000 10-60-730 Capital Projects 0 0 1111111 ! 0 0 10-60-740 Art In Public Places 38,536 90,000 1111111 ! „ Illlllf 90,000 141,100 Sub-Total 1,351,860 1,530,425 977,659 1,441,708 2,434,019 Outdoor Activity Center 10-65-110 Salaries 0 0 glll; 0 0 10-65-210 Health Insurance 0 0 "iiiii, 0 0 10-65-220 FICA Tax 0 01iiuuillllllll uuuuiiiiiilluuiii 0 0 10-65-230 Retirement 0 0 iiiuiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu °iiiii 0 0 10-65-250 Unemployment Tax 0 0 0 0 10-65-260 Workers Comp Claims 0 0 ¢ 0 0 10-65-280 Training Programs 0 0 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiioiiiiiiiiiiiii° 0 0 10-65-290 Travel, Meals and Lodging 0 0 IIIIIIII °i9; 0 0 10-65-295 Meals and Entertainment 0 0 iiiuu llllh 0 0 10-65-370 Other Professional Services 0 0 11111111iIlllli 200 0 10-65-380 Janitorial Services 11,790 15,000 111111 FIIIF�II 15,000 15,000 10-65-490 Professional Memberships 0 0 iiia Illlli 0 0 10-65-500 Operating Supplies 0 0 IIIIIII 0 0 10-65-510 Equipment Purchase and Repair 0 0 0 0 10-65-560 Utilities-Telephone 0 0 'ii iiii 0 0 10-65-561 Utilities-Natural Gas 987 1,236 1,236 1,236 1,200 10-65-562 Utilities-Electricity 1,196 1,236 III°°°°°°° , 1,236 1,200 !!!! 11111! 10-65-665 WTHP Expenses 0 00 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIII 10-65-670 Prop Mgmt-120 Zerex 120 51000 I; ' 1,000 60,000 10-65-690 Miscellaneous Expense 0 0 0 0 10-65-730 Capital Projects 0 0 l 0 0 10-65-740 Capital Purchases 0 0 IIIIIIII iii°I 0 0 Sub-Total 14,093 22,473 111111131111111442 18,673 77,400 TRANSFERS 10-90-920 Transfer to CERF-Police Dept 60,000 60,000 Illllll 'iiii 0 60,000 10-90-925 Transfer to RRF 0 0 IIIIIIII ""'I' 0 0 IIIIIIIIIII �� 10-90-930 Transfer to CERF-PublicWorks 0 50,000 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiiii ', g' tliiiii, 50,000 50,000 10-90-935 Transfer to CAF 200,000 550,000 III I � liiii; 550,000 750,000 10-90-940 Transfer to Debt Service Fund 0 0 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 0 0 10-90-950 Transfer to Water Fund 0 0 gj h 0 0 10-90-960 Transfer to CROS 0 326,379 I;I;I "11111; 0 326,379 10-90-970 Transfer to Committed Reserves 0 75,500 1111111k51„;''liiiif 1,170,500 0 Page 4 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 10-90-980 Transfer to Strategic Reserves 0 400,000 l III0 'iiiil 400,000 0 10-90-995 Salaries Clearing 0 0iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiP P 0 0 10-90-996 FICA Tax Clearing 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiiiiiiii 0 0 10-90-997 Unemployment Tax Clearing 0 0 III4 0 0 Sub-Total 250,000 1,461,879 1575,500 2,170,500 1,186,379 FISCAL AGENT IIII uu uuuuuuu 10-95-110 Salaries (8,252) 0 """'Ul k 2111111' 0 0 10-95-210 Health Insurance (4,350) 0 0 0 10-95-220 FICA Tax (575) 0 IIII ,iiiiVllllll 0 0 10-95-230 Retirement (405) 0 'i '''''', 0 0 10-95-250 Unemployment Tax (25) OIIIIIIIu 0 0 10-95-260 Workers Comp Claims 0 0 �illillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillilliliiiiiiiiiiiiiiii " 0 0 10-95-560 Telephone (43) 0 1111111 uIlillilililil 0 0 10-95-690 Misc. Payroll Expense 0 0VIII 0 0 Sub-Total (13,650) 0 11111115,682 0 0 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE TOTALS 3,632,068 6,178,730 4,488,113 6,220,553 7,094,828 GENERAL FUND REVENUE TOTALS 7,802,315 6,182,497 8,686,776 9,855,290 8,760,496 GENERAL FUND NEW REVENUE TOTALS 5,746,632 3,667,200 4,514,703 5,683,217 5,119,380 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE TOTALS 3,632,068 6,178,730 4,488,113 6,220,553 7,094,828 GENERAL FUND REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES 4,170,247 3,767 4,198,664 3,634,737 1,665,669 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE OVER NEW REVENUES 2,114,564 (2,511,530) 26,591 (537,336) (1,975,448) GF Restricted Reserves-Tabor Emergency Reserve 110,000 185,500 110,000 185,500 185,500 GF Restricted Reserves-Affordable Housing Reserve 135,426 135,426 135,426 730,426 730,426 GF Restricted Reserves-Fees in Lieu of P&OS Reserve 6,379 0 6,379 6,379 0 GF Committed Emergency Reserve 1,000,000 1,575,500 1,575,500 1,575,500 1,575,500 GF Strategic Reserve 1,100,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 GF Unassigned Fund Balance 4,170,247 3,767 4,198,664 3,634,737 1,665,669 RESTRICTED REVENUE FUND REVENUE TAXES 12-31-100 Restricted 1%GF Sales Tax 936,728 6$7,500 ° II , IIII'I'I'lllll 875,000 800,000 12-31-800 Interest Income 1,257 500 uiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuui uiiiiiiiiiiluiiii 400 400 Sub-Total 937,985 688,000 686,387 875,400 800,400 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 12-33-100 Grants&Aid to Agencies 11,000 11,000 14,000 11,000 Sub-Total 11,000 11,000 2,197 14,000 11,000 OTHER SOURCES AND TRANSFERS 12-36-900 Transfer In from Other Funds 0 0 !!Piii i IIll Ill IIill ill il'l'1 i; 0 0 12-39-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 158,332 38,838 IIIIIII III)))))), 537,577 561,977 Sub-Total 158,332 38,838 537,577 ui 537,577 561,977 RESTRICTED REV FUND "NEW" REVENUES 948,985 699,000 688,584 889,400 811,400 RESTRICTED REV FUND TOTAL REVENUE 1,107,317 737,838 1,226,161 1,426,977 1,373,377 EXPENDITURES 12-40-610 Transportation O&M 518,215 680,000 1111111 VIi 600,000 400,000 p IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Page 5 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 12-40-615 Transportation-Capital Exp 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiii 0 0 12-40-710 Trails O&M 16,525 20,000 ',',',,,,, N9'I ; ;IIIII' 20,000 185,000 12-40-715 Trails-Capital Expenditures 35,000 35,000 ii iiiiiiiii iiiiiiii 35,000 30,000 12-40-810 Capital Projects 0 0 uuuu 0 0 12-40-900 Transfer to Trans O&M Reserve 0 0iliiiiii pipiu,iuiui210,000 0 uuuiuuuduuuuiuuuuui IIIIP 12-40-915 Transfer to Trans Cap Reserve 0 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII VIII 0 0 12-40-920 Transfer to Trails O&M Reserve 0 0 0 0 12-40-925 Transfer to Trails Cap Reserve 0 0 0 0 12-40-930 Transfer to Cap Proj Reserve 0 0 1111111 °°4 0 0 12-40-940 Transfer to Other Funds 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuiiiii °°'I 0 0 Sub-Total 569,740 735,000 Ili55611265 865,000 615,000 RESTRICTED REV FUND REVENUES 1,107,317 737,838 1,226,161 1,426,977 1,373,377 RESTRICTED REV FUND EXPENDITURES 569,740 735,000 556,265 865,000 615,000 RESTRICTED REV FUND REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 537,577 2,838 669,896 561,977 758,377 RRF-Committed Emergency Reserve 0 210,000 210,000 210,000 210,000 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND REVENUE 20-30-100 Cons Trust(Lottery) Proceeds 6,738 6,800 1111111 ; !!„ tiiiiii 7,000 7,000 20-30-800 Interest Earnings 107 75 "' ' I' 75 75 20-30-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 13,762 20,637 1111111illllllll8llllll 20,608 27,683 Sub-Total 20,608 27,512 26,679 27,683 34,758 EXPENDITURES 20-40-410 Bank Charges 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiuui 0 0 20-40-650 Cons Trust Program Expenses 0 0 ii l; 0 0 20-40-910 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 uuuullllh 0 0 20-40-920 Transfer to Other Funds 0 10,000 1111111 IIIIII 0 10,000 Sub-Total 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 CTF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES(Unassigned Bal YE) 20,608 17,512 26,679 27,683 24,758 CAPITAL EQUIP REPLACEMENT FUND REVENUES 30-30-100 Hwy Use Tax Proceeds 47,218 47,394 I4IIIIII 58,000 48,346 30-30-500 Sale of CERF Assets 0 0 iihuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumdiiihuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uiiii 0 0 30-30-800 Interest Earnings 2,170 2,500 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 200 200 30-30-900 Transfer from G/F-PoliceDept 60,000 60,000 Illllll l iiii 0 60,000 30-30-910 Transfer from G/F-PublicWork 0 50,000 Iliiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiiiill 'lI 'I'I'I'I'I'- 50,000 50,000 30-30-920 Transfer from Utility Funds 0 90,000 ,, 90,000 90,000 30-30-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 259,267 139,839i ', !!!!!!! 205,695 88,895 Sub-Total 368,655 389,733 386,101 403,895 337,441 EXPENDITURES 30-40-745 Public Safety Fleet Purchase 57,731 60,000 IIIIII 0 60,000 g 0 140,000 30-40-750 Regular Fleet Purchase 6,658 0 30-40-755 Heavy Equipment Purchase (7,925) 200,000 1111111 200,000 450,000 Page 6 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 30-40-810 Lease/Purchase-Principal 92,265 100,000 ;;;;; 100,000 100,000 30-40-820 Lease/Purchase-Interest 14,232 15,000 Iii plg(! 15,000 15,000 30-40-910 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 1111111 °°h 0 0 Sub-Total 162,961 375,000 98,914 315,000 765,000 CERF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES(Unassigned Bal YE) 205,695 14,733 287,186 88,895 (427,559) CAPITAL ASSET FUND REVENUE 32-30-100 Reserved for Future Use 128,985 80,000 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii °q 87,000 0 32-30-500 Sale of Capital Assets 0 0 1111111 uiiiil 0 0 32-30-800 Interest Earnings (690) 0 1111111II, (100) 0 32-30-910 Transfer in from General Fund 200,000 550,000 'II ,GO 'llllll 550,000 750,000 32-30-940 Transfer in from DSF 0 0 °°°°°°°i 0 0 32-30-950 Transfer in from Water Fund 0 0 uiiiii 0 0 32-30-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 299,058 113,179 1111111 I � 13,411111 53,434 134 Sub-Total 627,353 743,179 603,350 590,334 750,134 EXPENDITURES p gjUS"""' 32-40-810 Capital Proj-Streets Existing 573,919 740 000 �iiuuuuuuu 660,000 700,000 32-40-815 Capital Proj-Streets New 0 0 illllll 0 0 32-40-820 Capital Proj-Buildings Exist 0 0 IIIIIIIII IIII�III2 30,200 0 p 32-40-825 Capital Proj-Buildings New 0 0 0 0 32-40-830 Capital Proj-Parks/OS Exist 0 0 1111111 0 0 32-40-835 Capital Proj-Parks/OS New 0 0 iiiuuuuuu 0 0 32-40-900 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 1111111 Viii; 0 0 32-40-910 Transfer to CAF Res-Streets 0 0 liiiiii !!!9. 0 0 32-40-920 Transfer to CAF Res-Bldgs 0 0 1111111 X1119; 0 0 32-40-930 Transfer to CAF Res-Parks/OS 0 01111111 IIIIII 0 0 Sub-Total 573,919 740,000 11141114,566 690,200 700,000 CAF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 53,434 3,179 558,784 134 50,134 CAF-Committed Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 COZENS RANCH OPEN SPACE(CROS)FUND REVENUE 35-30-100 Grants and Awards 0 735,000 1111111 "°IIh 75,000 300,000 35-30-110 In-Kind Services 0 0 1111111IIIIII 0 0 35-30-120 Miscellaneous Revenue 0 0iiiii 0 0 35-30-130 Interest Income 1,529 0 (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 200 0 35-30-910 Transfer in from General Fund 0 326,379 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 326,379 35-30-920 Transfer in from CTF 0 10,000 iiiiil 0 10,000 35-30-999 Carryover Balance 212,233 212,963111111 it % 212,992 275,692 III Sub-Total 213,762 1,284,342 213,070 288,192 912,071 EXPENDITURES 35-40-300 Design 0 0 Iliiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiiiiuuuuuumuuuuuuiiiiiilll'l 0 0 35-40-310 Amphitheater 0 0 1111111 0 0 Page 7 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 35-40-315 Bike Park 0 0 liiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiii 0 0 35-40-320 Landscape 0 60,000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' 0 50,000 35-40-325 Parking 0 O gg 0 0 35-40-330 Playground 0 600,000 II IIIIIIII�IIIIIIII 0 0 35-40-335 Restrooms 770 600,000 u „S 2,500 250,000 35-40-340 Trails 0 O hlliiiluii7ol5! 10,000 0 35-40-345 Utilities 0 OIIIIIII iii°; 0 160,000 35-40-900 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuii °°'I 0 0 Sub-Total 770 1,260,000 11510 12,500 460,000 CROS FUND REVENUES 213,762 1,284,342 213,070 288,192 912,071 CROS FUND EXPENDITURES 770 1,260,000 7,510 12,500 460,000 CROS FUND REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 212,992 24,342 205,560 275,692 452,071 DEBT SERVICE FUND REVENUE 40-30-100 Property Tax 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuliiiiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuliiiiii",!!!¢ 0 0 40-30-200 Specific Ownership Tax 0 0 ° 0 0 40-30-500 Bond Proceeds 0 0 uiiii 0 0 40-30-800 Interest Earnings 254 11000 100 100 40-30-910 Transfer in from General Fund 0 0 liillll "°19 0 0 40-30-990 Transfer in from DSF Reserves 0 0 iiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiiiiiiuuuuuuululuuuuumiiii iiiii 0 0 40-30-999 Carryover Balance 1,573 2,573 111111NIIIII 1 827 1,927 Sub-Total 1,827 3,573 1,840 1,927 2,027 EXPENDITURES 40-40-385 Treasurer's Fees GO Bond 0 0llllh 0 0 40-40-390 Abatements-GO Bond 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudi !!!!! 0 0 40-40-500 Cost of Issuance 0 0liiiu uuuuiiilllllh 0 0 40-40-550 Underwriters Discount 0 0 iimuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiilililiuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiilllll 0 0 . 40-40-810 Bond Principal-02 S&U Issue 0 0 !li hum, 0 0 40-40-811 Bond Principal-98 GO Issue 0 0 °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°;;;;;;°°°°°;;°°°°°°°;;;;;;; VIII 0 0 40-40-812 Bond Principal-98 S&U Issue 0 0 °°°°I °°°°°°°°o!!!! 0 0 40-40-820 Bond Interest-02 S&U Issue 0 0 IIIIIIII IIII6 0 0 40-40-821 Bond Interest-98 GO Issue 0 0 !!' iiii 0 0 40-40-822 Bond Interest-98 S&U Issue 0 0 0 0 40-40-850 Bond Agent Fees 0 0 111111 0 0 40-40-910 Transfer to DSF Reserves 0 0 ii iiiiiiiii iiiiiiii 0 0 40-40-920 Transfer to Other Funds 0 0 uiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuliiiiiiiiiiii °°'I 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 1,827 3,573 1,840 1,927 2,027 DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 DEBT SERVICE REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 1,827 3,573 1,840 1,927 2,027 Debt Service Fund Restricted Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 Debt Service Fund Committed Reserves 35,520 40,411 35,533 35,620 35,720 Page 8 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget WATER FUND REVENUES TAXES 50-31-100 Property Tax 0 0 VIII iiii 0 0 50-31-200 Fraser Firming Revenue 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiuuuuiuuuuuuuuuuuii °°'I 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 LICENSES&PERMITS 50-32-100 Excavation Permit Fees 2,250 275 II 3,000 275 Sub-Total 2,250 275 2,475 3,000 275 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 50-34-100 Customer Service Charges 1,073,290 1,100,000 1111111 i 'y'! 1,025,000 1,093,075 50-34-150 Penalties&Interest 4,227 2,000 1111111 6, ! 6,500 5,000 50-34-200 Plant Investment Fees 182,389 7,700 ; !""" 435,000 154,000 50-34-250 BPR Plant Investment Fees 0 0 9; 0 0 50-34-300 Water Meter Sales 32,084 50,000 1111111 mm41B2 95,000 50,000 Sub-Total 1,291,990 1,159,700 1,351,650 1,561,500 1,302,075 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE y' 50-36-100 Interest Earnings 9,341 6,000 iiiiili 3,000 3,000 50-36-900 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,844 2,500m° I 3,000 2,500 Sub-Total 13,185 8,500 3,436 6,000 5,500 OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 50-39-100 Debt Service Proceeds 0 0 uu °I 0 0 50-39-200 Grants and Aid from Agencies 0 0 0 0 50-39-910 Transfers In 0 0 Iiiiiii P 0 0 50-39-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 654,680 764,124 """' 781,538 1,233,293 Sub-Total 654,680 764,124 781,538 781,538 1,233,293 New Revenues 1,307,425 1,168,475 1,357,560 1,570,500 1,307,850 Total Revenue with Carryover 1,962,104 1,932,599 2,139,099 2,352,038 2,541,143 EXPENDITURES I - 310,000 350,659 50-40-110 Salaries 284,349 310,000 � �!W�VII1I2'; ' 50-40-210 Health Insurance 67,048 80,000 Iiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiii�N3' ''''' 80,000 81,878 50-40-220 FICA Tax 20,027 25,000I'I'Iuui ,'I 23,715 26,825 50-40-230 Retirement 14,501 15,000 hili �VI�, ! ' 18,600 35,066 50-40-250 Unemployment Tax 849 1,0001111111iiiii 930 1,052 50-40-260 Workers Comp Claims 0 0 1111111 °i°I 0 0 50-40-280 Training Programs 2,884 3,500hII18 3,500 3,500 50-40-290 Travel, Meals and Lodging 295 3,500 ,E 3,500 3,500 50-40-295 Meals and Entertainment 6 2,000 'u uiiiiiiu l 2,000 2,000 50-40-300 Administrative Reimbursement 0 0 '' iiiii 0 0 50-40-310 Legal Fees 77,298 65,000 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuu°u°uuiiiiui�I �' I ' °°° 65,000 65,000 50-40-330 Engineering Fees 46,427 100,000 IliiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiiiiiuillIIIIIIIIIIiiii 100,000 90,000 50-40-360 Computers-Networks and Support 12,243 7,000 25,000 25,000 50-40-370 Other Professional Services 8,613 60,000 I', 10,000 105,000 50-40-385 Treasurer's Fees 0 0 1111111 P 0 0 50-40-390 Abatements 0 0mu 0 0 50-40-410 Bank Charges 0 0 III lll9 0 0 50-40-430 Insurance 14,422 27,000 27,000 27,000 50-40-440 Advertising 0 500 500 500 „ 50-40-460 System Repair and Maint-Prod 65,506 160,0001 r 35,000 245,000 50-40-465 System Repair and Maint-Dist 21,580 265,000 1111111 i' 'i'I 25,000 162,000 Page 9 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 50-40-490 Professional Memberships 5,814 9,500 ' 9,500 9,500 50-40-500 Operating Supplies-Production 15,589 25,000 iiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu,,,,; lljli''''' 25,000 35,000 50-40-505 Operating Supplies-Distrib 38,954 80,000 , 70,000 45,000 50-40-510 Equipment Purchase and Repair 541 15,000 q; 5,000 5,000 50-40-520 Testing 17,970 10,000 iRmlmiioiiiiu 10,000 10,000 50-40-550 Postage&Billing Supplies 1,649 3,000 1111111 ' iii% 3,000 3,000 50-40-560 Utilities-Telephone 11,298 10,000 10,000 10,000 12,000 50-40-562 Utilities-Electricity 40,979 50,000 ',iiuumi � iiiii 50,000 50,000 um 50-40-670 Prop Mgmt-Fraser WTP 1,087 60,0005,000 60,000 ', I i!!q 50-40-680 Prop Mgmt-Maryvale WTP 8,927 8,000 „ 5,000 5,000 50-40-685 Prop Mgmt-St. Louis Headgate 0 0 0 0 50-40-690 Miscellaneous Expense 1,218 1,500PiilLlllllll 1,000 1,500 50-40-695 Bad Debt Write Off 0 0 VIII �1�6°° 0 0 IIIIIIIIIIII 50-40-715 Water Rights-Diversion&Dev 3,908 45,000 12,000 65,000 VIII �'iiuuuuuuuuuuuul 50-40-730 Capital Projects 0 425,000 0 805,000 50-40-740 Capital Purchases 00 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 0 um 50-40-760 Fraser Firming-CapProj 0 0 III4444 0 0 50-40-770 PIF-Capital Purchases 0 0 1111111 iiiii, 0 0 50-40-780 Capitalized Assets-Audit 0 0 l; 0 0 50-40-790 Depreciation 396,586 0 VIII 0 0 50-40-810 Debt Service-Principal 0 0 III 0 0 50-40-820 Debt Service-Interest 0 0 ii uuuu"Illlh 0 0 50-40-850 Debt Service-Agent Fees 0 0 "Illlh 0 0 50-40-910 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 liiiu uuuuuii uiiii 0 0 50-40-930 Transfer to CERF 0 45,0001111111 VIII gl0'iiiiC 45,000 45,000 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I��ill�iiuuuuuuuuuuuuu 50-40-970 Transfer to Reserves 0 0 100,000 77,000 50-40-980 Transfer to Strategic Reserves 0 7,700 "f9'0! iiiiil 38,500 77,000 50-40-990 Transfer to Wastewater Fund 0 0 IIID Doul 0 0 Sub-Total 1,180,566 1,919,200 702,971 1,118,745 2,528,980 WATER FUND REVENUES 1,962,104 1,932,599 2,139,099 2,352,038 2,541,143 WATER FUND EXPENDITURES 1,180,566 1,919,200 702,971 1,118,745 2,528,980 WATER FUND REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 781,538 13,399 1,436,128 1,233,293 12,163 Water Fund Committed Reserve 500,000 500,000 500,000 600,000 677,000 Water Fund Strategic Reserve 155,525 194,025 194,025 194,025 271,025 Water Fund Unassigned Reserve 781,538 13,399 1,436,128 1,233,293 12,163 WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES TAXES 0 0 0 0 Property Tax 0 0 uuuum mllil! 0 0 Specific Ownership Tax 0 0 Illlllll iii°I 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 LICENSES&PERMITS 55-32-100 Excavation Permit Fees 0 0 1111111iiiiii 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 55-34-100 Customer Service Charges 860,950 990,000 III III -VldVllllll 990,000 982,702 �uu uuuuuuuuuuul 55-34-150 Penalties&Interest 3,820 1,000 „IIIIIIIIIIIII 5,000 3,000 I �ullul l 11111' 55-34-200 Plant Investment Fees 180,000 300,000 lililillluuuullllll�l� 754,000 150,000 55-34-999 Contributed Assets 0 0 1111111 0 0 Page 10 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget Sub-Total 1,044,769 1,291,000 1,410,634 1,749,000 1,135,702 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE mjjjjjuuuuul�l� iiiii; 10,000 10,000 55-36-100 Interest Earnings 50,972 18 500 ijp�� 55-36-500 JFF Management Fee 29,000 29,000 29,000 37,800 55-36-900 Miscellaneous Revenue 0 0III4 0 0 Sub-Total 79,972 47,500 16,356 39,000 47,800 OTHER SOURCES&TRANSFERS 55-39-100 Debt Service Proceeds 0 0 ° °iiiii 0 0 55-39-200 Grants and Aid from Agencies 0 0 1111111 III uiiiii 0 0 55-39-910 Transfer in from General Fund 0 0 1111111 "!!!!4 0 0 55-39-920 Transfer in from WWF Committed Res JFF Plant R 0 0 1111111liiiiii 0 0 55-39-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 4,867,989 2,953,351 1111111II171IIIIIIIII 4,726,399 4,685,961 Sub-Total 4,867,989 2,953,351 4,726,399 4,726,399 4,685,961 New Revenues 1,124,741 1,338,500 1,426,990 1,788,000 1,183,502 Total Revenues with Carryover 5,992,731 4,291,851 6,153,389 6,514,399 5,869,463 EXPENDITURES 55-40-110 Salaries 287,334 325,000 6� iff 325,000 378,751 55-40-210 Health Insurance 66,911 83,000 1111111 'ii "'('' 83,000 87,908 55-40-220 FICA Tax 20,149 27,000 N �„ I �VIIIIII 24,863 28,974 55-40-230 Retirement 13,782 17,000 ' 'i ( 19,500 36,291 55-40-250 Unemployment Tax 852 1,000 "" """"""' IIIIII 975 1,136 881 55-40-260 Workers Comp Claims 0 0 0 0 55-40-280 Training Programs 700 3,000 ' 3,000 3,000 55-40-290 Travel, Meals and Lodging 0 3,000 111111 °o'I 3,000 3,000 55-40-295 Meals and Entertainment 0 III2,000 '..................... 2,000 2,000 55-40-310 Legal Fees 0 5 000 VIII !I 5,000 5,000 55-40-330 Engineering Fees 82,690 20,000 III g 20,000 85,000 55-40-360 Computers-Networks and Support 9,290 7,000 +IIIIIIIIIIIIII 18,000 15,000 55-40-370 Other Professional Services 8,577 15,000lduuuiiuil 6,000 45,000 55-40-410 Bank Charges 0 100 III 100 100 IIIIIIII Illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllli 55-40-430 Insurance 9,027 7,000 111111 (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII,,,,,,,IIIIIIII iiii6 7,000 10,000 55-40-440 Advertising 0 500 Ilhuuuulllllllllllll llllj, 500 500 55-40-460 System Repair and Maint-Collec 66,307 150,000 III yINOiiih' 150,000 150,000 55-40-490 Professional Memberships 5,252 6,000 iiiuuuuum iVIIIIIII 6,000 6,000 55-40-500 Operating Supplies-Collections 698 5,500 µ��,,,''iiiii 5,500 5,500 55-40-510 Equipment Purchase and Repair 39 50,000 liiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiIIR; 2,590 55,000 55-40-520 Testing 0 1,0001111111111111111111 "'1 1,000 1,000 55-40-550 Postage&Billing Supplies 1,649 2,500 IIIIII 2,500 2,500 55-40-560 Utilities-Telephone 3,256 2,000 ',jj G � , ',',';,',', 5,000 5,000 55-40-650 WW Treatment Charges/JFOC 228,471 290,000 iipuuuuuul Ili , ; ("!!p, 290,000 325,000 55-40-660 JFF CapRepl Reserve 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuumiiluumuuuuuuuuuuuuu „iiiii 0 0 55-40-670 JFF 0&M Reserve 0 0 0 0 55-40-690 Miscellaneous Expense 1,038 3,000 "" """"""' '''' 3,000 3,000 55-40-695 Bad Debt Write Off 0 0 1111111 0 0 55-40-730 Capital Projects 14,082 250,000 0 70,000 55-40-740 Capital Purchases 00 llll 0 0 55-40-760 PIF-Capital Projects 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiii 0 0 55-40-770 PIF-Capital Purchases 0 0 iiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiiiuuuuuuuuuuuuuuiiiiillll4 0 0 55-40-780 Capitalized Assets-Audit 0 0 111111 0 0 55-40-790 Depreciation 446,229 0 1111111 "11116 0 0 55-40-810 Debt Service-Principal 0 0 1111111 (11111 0 0 55-40-820 Debt Service-Interest 0 0 "11116 0 0 55-40-850 Debt Service-Agent Fees 0 0 1111111 0 0 Page 11 TOWN OF FRASER 10/31/2021 DRAFT 10/27/2021 2020 2021 2021 2021 2022 Actuals Budget Year to Date YEE Budget 55-40-910 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 !!!!! 0 0 55-40-930 Transfer to CERF 0 45,0001 , 45,000 45,000 55-40-970 Transfer to Reserves 0 0 iuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuq„,,,,uuuuuuuuuuuumiiiiil 0 50,000 55-40-980 Transfer to Strategic Reserves 0 800,000 800,000 0 55-40-990 Transfer to Water Fund 0 0 IIII4 0 0 Sub-Total 1,256,332 2,120,600 1445,194 1,828,438 1,419,660 WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES 5,992,731 4,291,851 6,153,389 6,514,399 5,869,463 WASTEWATER FUND EXPENDITURES 1,266,332 2,120,600 1,445,194 1,828,438 1,419,660 WASTEWATER FUND REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 4,726,399 2,171,251 4,708,195 4,685,961 4,449,803 WWF Committed Emergency Reserves 2,101,000 2,101,000 2,101,000 2,101,000 2,151,000 WWF Strategic Reserves 1,255,000 2,055,000 2,055,000 2,055,000 2,055,000 Wastewater Fund Unassigned Fund Balance 4,726,399 2,171,251 4,708,195 4,685,961 4,449,803 FRASER HOUSING AUTHORITY REVENUES 60-30-100 Reserved for Future Use 0 0 !!!!! 0 0 60-30-200 Grants 0 0 1111111 0 0 60-30-400 Application Fees 0 0 VIII 0 0 60-30-800 Interest Earnings 0 0 iii0 0 60-30-900 Miscellaneous Revenue 0 0 1111111 uuuuuuui iiiiill 0 0 60-30-910 Transfer in from General Fund 0 0 ” 0 0 60-30-999 Unassigned Fund Balance 0 0 Illlllll oiiiii 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 EXPENDITURES 60-40-310 Legal Fees 0 0 Ilii iiiii °i°I 0 0 60-40-370 Professional Services 0 0 liiiiii VIII, 0 0 60-40-430 Insurance 0 0 IIIiufi 0 0 III . 60-40-900 Transfer to General Fund 0 0 1111111 0 0 Sub-Total 0 0 0 0 0 FHA REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 FHA Committed Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 Page 12 FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES DATE: October 20, 2021 MEETING: Board of Trustees Workshop and Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room and Virtually PRESENT Board: Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees Andy Miller, Katie Soles, Parnell Quinn and Kaydee Fisher Staff: Town Manager, Ed Cannon; Deputy Town Clerk, Becky Allison; Marketing and Economic Development Manager, Sarah Wieck; Assistant Town Manager, Michael Brack; Finance Manager, Beth Williams; Police Commander Donnie Ransom Others: See attached list; In person: Grand County Commissioner Rich Cimino; Steve Fitzgerald; Ed Raegner; East Grand School District Superintendent Frank Reeves. On Zoom: Peggy Smith; McKenna Harford. Mayor Pro-Tem Waldow called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. 1. Workshop-2022 Budget 2. Rollcall: Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Andy Miller, Katie Soles, Parnell Quinn and Kaydee Fisher 3. Approval of Agenda: Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 5-0. 4. Consent Agenda: a) Minutes October 6, 2021 Trustee Soles moved, and Trustees Quinn and Miller seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda. Motion carried: 5-0. 5. Bi-Annual Update Board Of County Commissioners Grand County Commissioner Rich Cimino updated the Trustees. Grand County approved their preliminary 2022 budget the first week of October. Discussions included affordable housing and transit. 6. Amendment 4A - Ed Raegner Ed Raegner and Frank Reeves, the East Grand Schools Superintendent, presented information on Amendment 4A. The amendment is a bond request to remodel Fraser Valley Elementary, make improvements at East Grand Middle School, replace Granby Elementary School, and create a Career and Technical Education center at Middle Park High School. Reeves explained that bonds pay for capital projects. Page 2 of 2 7. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding_ a) Church Renovation Update - Steve Fitzgerald presented information regarding the renovation of the Fraser Historical Church. b) Housing Update and Survey Results— Michael Brack presented the housing survey results received from local business owners. 28 Fraser businesses and 33 Winter Park businesses responded. A short term fix was discussed. C) Regional Housing Initiative Memorandum of Understanding - Michael Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to approve the Regional Housing Initiative Memorandum of Understanding with the Towns of Fraser and Winter Park. Motion carried: 5-0. d) Resolution 2021-10-04 Approving Expenditures for Housing Initiatives— Michael Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to approve Resolution 2021-10-04 Authorizing the Town Manager to Approve Expenditures as Identified in the Memorandum of Understanding on Housing Collaboration between the Towns of Fraser and Winter Park Approved on October 20, 2021. Resolution 2021-10-04. Motion carried: 5-0. e) National Opioid Settlement Memorandum of Understanding - Ed Trustee Miller moved, and Trustee Fisher seconded the motion to approved the National Opioid Settlement Memorandum of Understanding. Motion carried: 5- 0. 8. Open Forum: a) Trustee Soles had questions on new revenues, and Finance Manager Williams addressed the questions. b) Mayor Pro-Tem Waldow reminded the Board that it is the anniversary of the East Troublesome Fire. 9. Updates a) Town Manager Cannon stated there are no changes regarding ongoing litigation. b) Town Manager Cannon shared that Mayor Vandernail will return to Board meetings November 3rd, as well as next week's planning commission meeting. Trustee Cerkvenik will return at the next Board meeting. 10. Adjourn: Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Miller seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:05p.m. Becky Allison, Deputy Clerk o ro IMiMN .,.MoaW��o, n C O L O R A D O MEMO TO: Chairperson Wolter and Planning Commissioners FROM: Catherine E. Trotter, AICP, Town Planner DATE: October 21, 2021 SUBJECT: Planner Briefing on The Willows Apartments at Grand Park MATTER BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Preliminary Plat and Final Plan - The Willows Apartments at Grand Park, Planning Area 2W.1 and 2W.2 ACTION REQUESTED: The applicant, Grand Park Development, LLC., is requesting Preliminary Plat and Final Plan approval of The Willows Apartments at Grand Park. BACKGROUND: This subdivision application is being processed as a Major Subdivision in accordance with Section 17-5-10 of the Fraser Municipal Code. The purpose of a major subdivision plat is to divide one (1) or more lots or parcels of land into a total of five (5) or more lots or five (5) or more dwelling units. Maps below indicates the general vicinity of this proposed development: X III I1 29 r ^ IT E �a^ � e hM vd �'r d' 370, q 0tl.. N CO� d��r�'.II' � d„�.qq� ..' ry „� 9d 1. ^ r° i'qA"I” h a 0 a:'o N .o 61' oauu Mob ii:'R'x '"uWOHp'�i,i,io,G,m '•,• ""'0' ^ IA, According to the project narrative, the applicant is proposing a 204 unit for-rent multi-family residential community to be constructed in two phases near Old Victory Road and American Willow Drive. Phase 1 includes 132 for-rent multi-family units and a clubhouse and Phase 2 includes 72 for-rent multi-family units. The development application is located within the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (PDD). A copy of the PDD is in the packet. This planning area is 2W and the PDD allows for an average density on 7.6 units per acre, 150 detached and 100 attached residential units, 278 lodging units and 30,000 square feet (SF) of commercial on 33.8 acres. This development application would create a total of 259 units on 33.8 acres which equates to an average density of 7.66 units/acre. 9 residential units are being transferred from 5W. The approved land use for Planning Area 5W is 70 detached residential units and 30 detached residential units. The Final Plan for Planning Area 5W allows 70 detached residential units. With this density transfer, a total of 79 units have been allocated, leaving 21 residential units left in Planning Area 5W. The Land Use and Development Notes on sheet 3 of 11 of the PDD state the following: Planning Area 2W comprises of 33.8 acres on an upland on the west side of Cozens Meadow. The area is adjacent to the railroad — served by the Old Victory Road and Grand Park trail system. This area has views of the Meadow and the Divide. A series of ponds and wetland related landscape may be utilized to transition to the pasture condition of the Meadow. The architecture will draw from traditional forms and materials of lodges and residential neighborhoods. The development standards for Planning Area 2W suggest a mixed-use land use, with a 75' height maximum, 0' front yard setback, 0' side yard setback, 0' rear yard setback and 10% open space requirement. There is also a 15' improvement and 20' building setback from Old Victory Road. u P 9 fl M'i V 0 P We have sent this development application to review agencies and utility entities for outside agency review. Agency review comments are in the packet. Applicant must address outside review agency comments from the following entities: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Xcel Energy, and Mountain Parks Electric. Included in the packet are review comments provided by Public Works relating to utility and construction standards. Merrick & Company has also provided drainage and utility engineering comments. PRELIMINARY PLATS: Add land use table to plats. The table shall include: land uses, approximate acreage of each land use and percentage of each land use, total acreage and square footage of property, total numbers of lots, maximum number of each type of dwelling unit proposed, parking and average density per acre. See Checklist. Add Old Victory Road (OVR) building and improvement setbacks to plat in accordance with the Grand Park PDD (Rec.# 2005012709), Sheet 3. For consistency, use similar language that is on Final Plan. Clarify plat note #10. All setbacks are zero. For consistency, use similar language that is on Final Plan. FINAL PLAN: Clarify Note #6 (regarding the density transfer) to indicate that in Planning Area 5W, 79 of the 100 units have been accounted for leaving 21 units to be platted in 5W. On sheet 12 of 14 of the Final Plan, denote bus stops as existing or proposed. OTHER: A letter from US Army Corps of Engineers has been provided approving the realignment of Cozens Ditch. Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment (All dead-end streets require turnarounds or cul-de-sacs per Attachment A-12 - Cul-De-Sac and Turnarounds for Streets. All turnarounds shall provide ten (10) feet of level, treeless ground around the perimeter. Special attention should be given to provide adequate functional snow storage and sight distance. All turnarounds shall be signed "Emergency Turn Around, No Parking Anytime."). The Public Transit Plan included in the FPDP (Sheet 12) must be amended to conform with the Transit Plan approved as part of the FPDP for the Meadows and Planning Area 3Wc (Rec. #2020001835). The applicant needs to confirm the exterior lighting is dark sky compliant. " ggd41 d � IS 1::,1 o. VVliv1d'J o c:c�1:N vw Y61" aowu"II PARKING: Link to PG[NOQ Sp2C8 [Squin8rO8OtS. |tappears the applicant has met and exceeded the parking requirements. There is also some attorney correspondence in the packet. The letter dated October 1, 2021, from The VVhitmer Lovv Firm indicates that staff will recommend denial of this development application unless certain matters are corrected, and the plan resubmitted nnlater than October 14. 2021. As stated inthe same letter, the following deficiencies previously were noted last spring and summer, yet remain unaddressed: 1. The portions of Planning Area 23W included in the development area of the preliminary plat and FP[)Pmust beremoved topreserve the Cozens Meadow open space in accordance with the Annexation Agreement and PDD Plan. 2. The areas shown as 2W.3 and 2WA on the FPDP must be removed because they are not part of the current development plan and they will not be approved as future development sites until actual development p|ana, consistent with the POO, are submitted. 3. Grand Park must agree to provide a dedicated riQht-of-xvayfor and construct Old Victory Road from the existing terminus atMountain Willow Drive toKings Crossing Road as part ofthe subdivision improvements for this project. TheUnningforoornp|eUnQcertain segments should beaddressed inthe SIA. 4. Grand Park must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary toserve the Willows project, aovve|| oofutunodeve|npment. The proposed Willows project vvi|| exoeedthecopooib/ ofthecurrentsyetem. Cmnstructinnof these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA, or in a separate improvement agreement, and must be completed before any Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for the Willows Apartments. Tow/n o[ Fra�ur �V}4,'2 c/[/ccO7O 736-�49l [ax970-72�'��l8 �wvv�a�e,cc|nra�ncom Staff has provided the following materials in the packet: • Planner Briefing (THIS MEMO) • Draft PC Resolution 2021-10-01 • Notice of Public Hearing • Public Works & Engineering Comments • Agency Review Comments • Public comments • Grand Park PDD • Attorney Correspondence The applicant has provided the following materials in the packet: • Preliminary Plat • Final Plan • Project Narrative • Terracina response letters • Civil TKE response letters • 2004 Rendezvous TIA • 2W Trip Generation Letter • USACE Correspondence The applicant has also provided the following materials that are not in the packet: • Density chart • HUD Environmental Assessment • Soils and Foundation Investigation • Civil Plans and Reports • Drainage Report • Neighbor list • Title Commitment RECOMMENDATION: Staff has the following concerns regarding this application: 1. Improper Inclusion of 23W into Development Plan: a. The portions of Planning Area 23W included in the development area of the preliminary plat and the FPDP were not removed to preserve the Cozens Meadow open space in accordance with the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD Plan, as was previously requested of the Developer by staff. b. Incorporation of portions of Planning Area 23W in the development area is contrary to the terms and intent of the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD and is destructive of the goal of preserving Cozens Meadow. c. The Developer has argued that there are prior"precedents" that justify inclusion of Planning Area 23W tracts into the Willows Apartments development area. However, rPN " ".N..X Irpry° oP'c: N r7061„� c o',uw 11 the prior"precedents" referred to by the Developer do not justify the current proposal. The Planning Area 23W tracts referred to were not incorporated into those development areas and did not detract from the meadow areas intended for a conservation easement. d. Developer's proposed plan is an apparent attempt to utilize more than the 33.8 acres it is allotted to enhance and expand its development beyond what was contemplated by the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD, all at the expense of Cozen Meadows's available acreage. e. Accepting Developer's arguments in favor of inclusion of pieces of 23W into its development plan for the Willows Apartments means abandoning the idea that Planning Areas are to be self-contained. If development areas are not self-contained and located where the PDD says they should be located, then they could be configured any way in the future, and not consistent with the intent of the 2003 Annexation Agreement of 2005 PDD. 2. Improper Inclusion of 2W.3 and 2WA into Development Plan: a. The areas shown as 2W.3 and 2WA on the FPDP were not removed, also as previously requested by staff. Because these areas are not part of the current development plan, they cannot be approved as future development sites, unless and until actual development plans, consistent with the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD, are submitted to the Town of Fraser for review and approval. 3. Lack of Commitment to Dedicate Right-of-Wad[: Developer must agree to provide a dedicated right-of way for and construct Old Victory Road from the existing terminus at Mountain Willow Drive to Grand Park Drive as part of the subdivision improvements for this project. The timing for completing certain segments should be addressed in the SIA. To date, Developer has not committed to dedicate said right-of-way. 4. Lack of Commitment to Construct Sewer Crossing and Improvements: Developer must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Willows project, as well as future development. The proposed Willows project will exceed the capacity of the current system. Construction of these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA, or in a separate improvements agreement, and must be completed before any Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for Willows Apartments. To date, Developer has not committed to construct the sewer crossing and associated improvements. Based on these concerns and those of the Town Attorney, staff recommends that the Planning Commission push up the preliminary plat for review by the Board of Trustees per Code Section 19-1-210 (f) and that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the FPDP and preliminary plat by the Board of Trustees. See PC Resolution 2021-10-01 in packet. Please contact me with questions/concerns. c..Liro.ejr. towiri„firaser..co..us ry Mbr�11 ,.0 II II �. TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2021-11-01 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2 FOR THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK (PLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W.2). At a regular meeting of the Fraser Planning Commission held on October 27, 2021, a public hearing was held for consideration of a Final Planned Development Plan (FPDP) amendment and Preliminary Plat for The Willows Apartments at Grand Park; and WHEREAS, Grand Park Development, LLC., is the current owner of the property; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting development approval which would create 204 residential units on 16.8 acres; and WHEREAS, it was the opinion and finding of the Planning Commission that the application should be "pushed up" pursuant to Section 19-1-210 (f), for final determination on both the Final Planned Development Plan amendment and Preliminary Plat for the Willows Apartment at Grand Park; and WHEREAS, after the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant revised the Final Plan Development Plan (FPDP) to address two of the deficiencies that led to the Town Staff recommending denial of the application; and WHEREEAS, those portions of Planning Area 23W and future development areas 2W.3 and 2WA previously included in the development area submittal were removed from the development plan. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT THE TOWN BOARD HEREBY APPROVES THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 2 THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Developer must agree to provide a dedicated right-of way for and construct Old Victory Road from the existing terminus at Mountain Willow Drive to Grand Park Drive as part of the subdivision improvements for this project. The timing for completing certain segments should be addressed in the SIA. 2. Developer must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Willows project, as well as future development. The proposed Willows project will exceed the capacity of the current system. Construction of these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA, or in a separate improvements agreement, and must be completed before any Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for Willows Apartments. 3. Add land use table to plats. The table shall include: land uses, approximate acreage of each land use and percentage of each land use, total acreage and square footage of property, total numbers of lots, maximum number of each type of dwelling unit proposed, parking and average density per acre. 4. Add Old Victory Road (OVR) building and improvement setbacks to plat in accordance with the Grand Park PDD (Rec.# 2005012709), Sheet 3. For consistency, use similar language that is on Final Plan. 5. Clarify plat note #10. All setbacks are zero. For consistency, use similar language that is on Final Plan. 6. Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment (All dead-end streets require turnarounds or cul-de-sacs per Attachment A-12 - Cul-De-Sac and Turnarounds for Streets. All turnarounds shall provide ten (10) feet of level, treeless ground around the perimeter. Special attention should be given to provide adequate functional snow storage and sight distance. All turnarounds shall be signed "Emergency Turn Around, No Parking Anytime."). 7. The applicant needs to confirm the exterior lighting is dark sky compliant. 8. Applicant must address outside review agency comments from the following entities: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Xcel Energy, and Mountain Parks Electric. 9. Address review comments provided by Public Works relating to utility and construction standards and drainage and utility engineering comments provided by Merrick & Company. Provide revised Construction Drawings to Town of Fraser by end of day of November 8, 2021. 10.Provide all final plat documents, including, but not limited to complete Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with Engineers Cost Estimate, and provide 911 address mylar and digital files of plat. 11.Final documents to be reviewed and approved by Town Engineer and Town Attorney. 12.Pay all applicable fees. If such conditions are not satisfied, the approval provided by this resolution is no longer valid. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3,d DAY OF November 2021. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: Absent: BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk LU Lu o - N� OL O Ov�i N Y7 a vO�w n4�z a _ U 7 x r^� r4 2 2m jrya, Lu �Q� gW(D� 203 Z "0 ooz; duo a _ ;a a o LLo 100 d �_wGLZ?U a C w la 3O Li w _-LL Q � oapG J Uw _ V = Q i�i C1 CU U j �N Ja o - U U z ��✓ f- - O :z C, Z Z_J W�w- - U zo oa z I O u°a I i I. , c o n I _ I I I � lily I a (�III I i 11 '1 1rulllllll�i�i I, , 1� "��,I z o - 11111 w I ,/ , „uM t1t. l n O N co — II n� - - - aF5 CS J i Q o — 3 Li ruw w ru rur Q Z Li E Z O o H d � U G" N o N w N a � Y2 J N mo LU >< "o w ~ 00 J w JON �o Q JZQ w UJ(D a X00 � =�z N �Qz az z g =0 N 0 LL d � O ti rz 3x a �, wa uJ C L n Uo LE �uz - �o �o i� dx " haw oLL w LE - ~ _ _ -_ LE LE LE LE z �'Pz �� jU L (�� m3 moi_ oNYG _ - - jv - L ^� y iw„ z z a Z C w z nz a'i w rCi LLi 7.3 - LL6,w LLCw- - G W - O _ U - _ iLVVG = ,LJ�J.']w�C = Lw trLL _ aGw Z- Gam ri,u 4_ - _ sJ m w ^_ - w6� U- N � G��• _ i __ _ Z -C rL a - U � �':r 3 U a�{z - L _-_ az '2w cn U N O �' �� !! } I z t /' U � OCL / ; woo 1 � r-I a�, 1 e 1 { I a (n 20 x W J0N oo W Q >zw F om f Z !QQ d LU(D i OO j0 L.J T � � Z O 3 lu w nVNI I y 1 OOZ mow'laavl J' I, a 001 lk I o II U a�mz K 1 I 1 ♦ — , �! 1 I 1� � ♦ I ► %� \\� ry 1 o z \ a a w \' V r O o 11 1 u L � I Of w co LU w co F- -LL _ i I o N � w W a ~ (+'�N `~Doo \ 4 % pp W �< LL~ 00 Z .'i 0 _ ✓/ Q g w V 0 O a o a oo Qg 0 G YR z aLL � „ o J V k m J �,F , moo,/♦ ` N ` �♦ a � IY 71 z � � o a ' s a > _ Ll i �ate\ ♦ o ,„ r a Q. II � � ♦ O� lu W ♦ U i o l z r / _ z g m w G N 0 o so w w I za Wm o N 'A 7 x N 0 W �Q� F� — ri LLO° C z0a� .''�LL Lu _j ° w� QN '�w 'lil Q JZQ r-i I W ' Q z p� gI� oo i a wvz loo g - 0 I r Of 1�v`�/�'� o/�� r,l•^I�� i � Bull ° o`7.� o � w -may k: piiiii�lnlll a ' � ,(� � k J \� pIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIpIP""'"' O r,� •,�-'_--'��r4i .,�� , m` � vvvvvvvvv' w 3 A a a o `o LL] :, y 'sll/ P uul llggllllul"o o CY \ �� re IIIIII��(((Illllllllliulld z- o. M ��IIII��IIIIIIII�IIIIIIIViu CL ' IIIIIIIIIVII' a w W �- �� `✓ 1�u1 / II IIIIIIII III 6 W i a> o� M 1w Q o N H I. I u Z m o W 1( 4' O ) O Lu d ti a Lu a —IP r z r LUIS Lu JAN Q HQw i Z Q a LU(D z ° loo mr i Q ��z OS llr / II �zl III ll III° � ,Inlln -- LU v" `., s, ,(/ 11�II I''s_' ,' -off,;•` '' / 'd� �O luore .�lr ✓j��C �,ti\. �`" .IIID. ° / w I� ci III ....�...,�' p' --/�/f/' ^iVltllVll 0 3 NIS. .�d" a� / - a r,Yw�Q g0 a a fI a °ula9 C„aIIIII. ^ W II IIVIIIIIIIIII o o 0 I ' Illllu'I' uplVll�� ;i'p'ill I, idlllpll a s � a z I,lllllilllllllll, ^N !IIIIIIII�I��IIIIIIIII�I� wY _ Th 01 ” � a lrlllllil I MIWu, u° s a a w d w � W ;_ �I11111 V w � s W �IIIIumiMi"muw. `��' '�Ndi' I.IINu��Krrrrrry>"kl ? w o � Z a � m o a a Q N giiIIIIIVVII°I VNh M p W o z M J a ur?a LL, I N aa�pr z O w i r 'lllk°l°" v o v C/7 Lu u 0- Ln LO Q�r4 w w T c- 2: < "s c C)0 Lu —JON �o _j 'tic < �—q LU < LU(D 100 < z < Go[ 10 0 rm, N-1 �D Yk 1011, zu I z 0 z o-, 0 0 u z < CD Q�o " J n W o _ Q a� N y\ U Ln z Oaf 'oo Lu JQrj Q JzQ F erJ 3a �1"�<� Z J� iqa� I � •Mr as a w z ico 001 01 ID Of 13 a I ®f ( 3z W? os - I` - `o 1' .......... II4 ✓ t f ,. 3sw M. .._ . . i1`:;:;:r�?:•'�' i` _:;%�``',, gat ',� ifi:::-:::- 70 i E7 \ J il . its f p -------------- j. O IV 3w w `4 b - T5� J[? — 1 O~m Q t' Z � 1 _ MN I " op 1 _ .? �� a' f; saaammamv ,a d� ..r., w NeWN, - �- o m z am "'M-RHIR z ♦ a SAO r, w aw W o= a- u U N 1 N 2: �Q� "O g ~ co 0 0LU -10 ar .'w0 Q JzQ � 3= a wU100 z x z Qg �o _ - lL o a—sZ ✓- >a - - 0 1p gm, �w 2 - v �a_< r moa ' : 11 �. w0 �If dU �LL ti - r - `a , w 3 _ P. .I U 4'0 rc _ =�f HIM - a 4 � F r yr . ^H - d1 K O z zz o „ys w i a 00 3a w= _j p IIJw =w �w NK1N I dltil I'lI NNNlllllll I v n. V�I��) m -i Z_G � �I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII s LU N Y� a �'��\\I��II'I;I,�Iluuuuul M��1 �I 1��1� I��Illllllllllln� V� 'YV�VV� N �Q� W V w^r o �s o LDo = d oo I� Z i J w o �W —JON "gIY'"IIIIIIP ii!I IIIIryry"II mI I� w s LU ZU s-32 — _`aQrz Q llm �14w w-o 0 b J [, —i 3 m UJ(D =120 z I„ 100 LL rig - I l� r \ Ing — i .e w .,v 0 � z W # .. LU C7 za Q-o a� z G" N N a Q W V)Q ? w� Q �o z On- o0 Lu J0N 'Nw od Q JzQ Y ~I�uj Zp � 1 �^� � �� •� 3N 3U J w r V n z j K �A ' Y, J' I F'n,I,.V Y O� 9 / d = z o o s °a, I� ,?e OZI 75 \ ,Li w oiCO ,e i 04- "j, f �) V i � J w a., 1 �x I' lw ,1111, `" lw Z r Q waa J z i a s IL z LU 1• w w �-10 ~ J 00, C/7 `w z 0 z� 009 szw gx° 0 mw 00£ I Euo Now -woo Q r^Y� �p a 0 c zoo H Z N aza _U ~� Z u wiz J z Oaf 6 o �z) W 00 Lu JAN oW J I zmF� a Q J Z Q 0'. r-iQ� ozolo gLu J 2�Z C)� N p ' 1 I = r i !I ~: r p I � O �6� o° I c II Z�a I I I i azo r Lu F I � Idpl Q W LL, o � I J NL"LU �� Q z az z as I�^IIIIIII ;✓.! . ,. , _---_-�'° , � III � � I, ;• I� - � _ _-_ i a Ilii I�,=I � ,\ 'I', I - I „'l �; ,,,, ' , 'I,;I, A �`-- � -„•I,II I I,.I I I (I � II , J I I I € r l l u�l:-7,,, Ic __ I I 111IIIII I. I ” r � , II, p I , I I l z� I gPa III M awe I Ily II II I I J W 01 00 z OaN opo '_ � I I I SII II!I < J�Q �w� III III Q �Q� zow Z ��a ❑�� II i , I I I l gw�z �j� - r d Q ,IIIIV i �' I If ,3 tk., RI \F At ^ I ✓�r 'a.' � iI I I'I i �� ✓ a it .\ , � "'.:"' �, II II I I I I I I,''i 4 I , i IP � ` _ t� ✓''°;- - III^ I I V,I I I I {I i II ; I INI^il�i - 1�1 ....... I I 4 I II,�, 441I ! I I SII Uo �I l � I III I I I I f,II�� I �IIII 'Irl I\I, III if I I e 11 ' r �I it , I I FRASER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021-10-01 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC ("DEVELOPER") FOR APPROVAL OF A FPDP AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS AT GRAND PARK. At the regular meeting of the Fraser Planning Commission held on October 27, 2021, a hearing was held for consideration of a Final Planned Development Plan (FPDP) amendment and Preliminary Plat for the Willows Apartments at Grand Park; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on the matter in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 19, Article 1, Division 2 of the Municipal code of the Town of Fraser and other provisions thereof; and WHEREAS, for the following reasons, staff recommended denial of the application: 1. Improper Inclusion of 23W into Development Plan: a. The portions of Planning Area 23W included in the development area of the preliminary plat and the FPDP were not removed to preserve the Cozens Meadow open space in accordance with the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD Plan, as was previously requested of the Developer by staff. b. Incorporation of portions of Planning Area 23W in the development area is contrary to the terms and intent of the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD and is destructive of the goal of preserving Cozens Meadow. c. The Developer has argued that there are prior "precedents" that justify inclusion of Planning Area 23W tracts into the Willows Apartments development area. However, the prior"precedents" referred to by the Developer do not justify the current proposal. The Planning Area 23W tracts referred to were not incorporated into those development areas and did not detract from the meadow areas intended for a conservation easement. d. Developer's proposed plan is an apparent attempt to utilize more than the 33.8 acres it is allotted to enhance and expand its development beyond what was contemplated by the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD, all at the expense of Cozens Meadow's available acreage. e. Accepting Developer's arguments in favor of inclusion of pieces of 23W into its development plan for the Willows Apartments means abandoning the idea that Planning Areas are to be self-contained. If development areas are not self-contained and located where the PDD says they should be located, then they could be configured any way imaginable in the future, and not consistent with the intent of the 2003 Annexation Agreement or 2005 PDD. 2. Improper Inclusion of 2W.3 and 2WA into Development Plan: a. The areas shown as 2W.3 and 2WA on the FPDP were not removed, also as previously requested by staff. Because these areas are not a part of the current development plan, they cannot be approved as future development sites, unless and until actual development plans, consistent with the 2003 Annexation Agreement and 2005 PDD, are submitted to the Town for review and approval. 3. Lack of Commitment to Dedicate Right-of-Wad[: Developer must agree to provide a dedicated right-of way for and construct Old Victory Road from the existing terminus at Mountain Willow Drive to Grand Park Drive as part of the subdivision improvements for this project. The timing for completing certain segments should be addressed in the SIA. To date, Developer has not committed to dedicate said right-of-way. 4. Lack of Commitment to Construct Sewer Crossing and Improvements: Developer must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Willows project, as well as future development. The proposed Willows project will exceed the capacity of the current system. Construction of these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA, or in a separate improvements agreement, and must be completed before any Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for Willows Apartments. To date, Developer has not committed to construct the sewer crossing and associated improvements. WHEREAS, it is the opinion and finding of the Planning Commission that the application should be "pushed-up," pursuant to Section 19-1-210(f), for final determination by the Fraser Board of Trustees on both the Final Planned Development Plan (FPDP) amendment and Preliminary Plat for the Willows Apartments at Grand Park. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO: RESOLVED, that pursuant to the provisions of said Section 19-1-210(f) of the Fraser Municipal Code, the Planning Commission hereby pushes-up for final determination by the Fraser Board of Trustees both the Final Planned Development Plan (FPDP) amendment and Preliminary Plat for the Willows Apartments at Grand Park. FURTHER RESOLVED, that staffs' recommendations set forth above are incorporated into the decision of the Planning Commission to push this matter up and are to be forwarded to Fraser Board of Trustees for consideration in connection with their consideration of the Final Planned Development Plan (FPDP) amendment and Preliminary Plat for the Willows Apartments at Grand Park application. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED BY THE FRASER PLANNING COMMISSION on this 27th day of October 2021. TOWN OF FRASER PLANNING COMMISSION Vice Chairman ATTEST: Town Clerk w w LD I VII > C- U) rU!> .2 1 rr- 00 0- 25 R, LLU)'0 < 4 z F<— w N ui P co (ZD U� �Zoi CL, W o CL Z olio " 7 a zw: 2 z 10 lo 10 10 10 U) D LL 12 > w 0 'o zw fY -LIQ . .00 Iz z 104 E 1. 0 Z. -Z §-,, z < IL z U)0 <E E Z L) Cc x CLIOL0 DISS LU z I o w w= , < A P U) Ei 0 LL LL 0 m w > � T °H a cc 7 W.R W'-M (.)11 C) -——------------------— > U) LUV? I. w Z W.«gM; 0. , cc WU Z�fi Z < R.,5A. CL o r w z I 3:1aQd 8 z--..�a 0 ------- ------------- ------ U) IT- .0 VLSM 0 0) too— 0 CL 9 1 Wo Z 0 2 ILQ M < 'too. F Z o . a Z LD U ir cL Z W Z Z< 5 3F J Po too solvIRNM 1vonAMMIM1114 EO 1 Oil --------- --------- sa Bill 1� a T T___ < w VIA . ill 11M t Him 1 It ............... wm ---------- e I a h d1hE His inps! 121 M Ni1 HUI in; l IBI lult H R W! !!Hilt jR jill gin !He 10 I'M qn "M P I Ull Qj !,A IM all wNs 1— un H1 A t HAI Ms HIS I am MH Opt ify "I Hit v gq� . i� i FF -s' ply nil 111011 1 101 IN JI'll JIM iful H! I a E H ; HIM AOM 111 Hil MU 1M H MH MUI U Oil 1HI OR W! R11 1 H w 19 1 1q. all Is 01 IV 1 Hill R: HH fuh 11 A H Via U00110l o wis uNif WH En Nil 1 ill un!!M "I lur JIM Utz 11-1 HIP ;in ; AQ , 1. 11 M Of Nil 11 all W"!q 11" 1, OPIUM H !!I 111HIIH 1 JIM H1141111 SM M.I G ul 0 nvy.ny M �,)��!"I Mi Ism SHT up 2�2�7, I MOU WSM vs WHO I�u swag E HIM W ME lei W M :D 9 WIM HM H 111 if a 1 h M EL z o 01 9 < z H 00 ---0 uj W- z 0 1 < F- < < C11 1-- z n (D(D w < z 0 z LLJ z 00 Z. 0 z < C) Z 0 W) z w < -wj x D,-0L� w >w 10 �>1 cc CL Z w < =)! 1. w IL wo < ZO z z 10 zs z dG fi —----- r-?'i (AtPA' wv/ Al Jp "o lih� 1.1'' _ :-rte.',.._;';___•;,_..%, ------------------ z W Er z <0 C-j 0 M < zm. J-- LL, SIB R IM 0 Cr 0 LL z J-- 1�0 o U m F-0 N U) ) �6 U' N30 3:w W6 < a ass 2 zn(UD,�3 1 (L ozd 0 z -j W W)I<x So Lu z D U- 0 p 4�9 R 10 0.0 -Z. Iz w CL z Z Q C)0 cis <zz z -Vaf� 342 Si azo IL —---------- aG I Jill II ;W)r iL / a & 2 IL z 1.0 d Z < CL LU95! z g uj 2F. w Op' -0 jjb Ei Lu z 9 1 2 < D �6 3: w 2- 0 N n CLR, w z (3 C) w z Z o CL ±x< w 0 < w T 8 qa rr W> 10 T>1 am Lli < ZO 10 06 Z > Z > 4;3 asz w 11 NN, 4L— 2 (L IL '0 god cc W 2 N ui 0 i. < U) LD m ' , 1 2. i li'Mil f,� < 0 N 1 0 IN CL R ui�- PgA I ta Z Cf) (D U3 W� zo fz-r z,' p < cn < LU (n Do-0 3 F- 0 w Z m CL Z 0 < t,-0 Z < xu� § uj < LO 0 lo z z < Lu z 0 b. z M 1 4 Wo, :) ;t g zo iD zo 10 3: U) Z F- w w5: 7� LU E-I� N Z 0 < W F- FL 00 z fr cc > > cc af 0 z 0 1 U) 0 F Ir (" z 4�1 ?L 80 1A :9 J Willows Apartments Filing #1 (PA 2W.2) Preliminary Plat & FPDP a. Plan Intent and Goals The submitted Preliminary Plat & FPDP of the Willows Apartments Filing #I and Filing #2 (2w.2) at Grand Park is for the development of a 204 unit for-rent HUD multi-family residential community planned to be constructed in two phases. The primary purpose of which is to address the badly needed long- term rental housing shortage for the area in a superior central location close to amenities. Phase one includes 132 units for-rent multi-family residential community and a clubhouse. Phase 2 includes 72 units for-rent multi-family units within the existing Willows (2w) neighborhood. The plan is designed to complement and integrate with the existing 55 residences located in the Willows at Grand Park. Phase one of the project is located at the corner of Old Victory Road and American Willow Dr. separated into two lots by American Willow Dr. Phase 2 is lot 3 adjacent to Lot 2 and located between Mountain Willow Dr. and Old Victory Rd. Phase 2 will immediately follow construction of phase 2 so the project will be generally completed in a consistent time frame from the start of phase 1 through completion of phase 2 with a goal to complete the entire 204 units by 2023. The planning area 2W.2 Phase 1 (Lots 1 and 2) is 8.25 acres, consisting of seven 3-story garden-style apartment buildings that are no more than 47' feet in height with 132 total apartment units, (5) garage buildings, (4) trash enclosures, (1) ski storage building, and (1) clubhouse. The plan offers surface and garage parking, with some tandem parking spaces. The project gross density is 16 du/ac providing 2.10 acres of open space - 25.5%. The planning area 2W.2 Phase 2 (Lot 3) is 3.56 acres, consists of (5) 3-story garden-style apartment buildings that are less than 47 feet in height with 72 total apartment units, (4) garage buildings, and (2) trash enclosures. This phase also offers surface and garage parking. Phase two's project gross density is 20 du/ac providing 0.90 acres of open space-25.20. The site amenities include the clubhouse, with an outdoor pool and spa, firepit, and outdoor kitchen area. The ski storage building which allows residents to store ski equipment in individual lockers. It will also house an automated package delivery system, pet spa, and bike and ski tuning rooms as well as gathering places for the residents. An on-site bus stop will give residents access to the surrounding areas. The apartment buildings and clubhouse are both oriented to take advantage of the views of James Peak and the Divide and not loom over the existing 55 residents. b. Integration The parcel is surrounded by Planning Area 23W with connections to Old Victory Road, Mountain Willow Dr. and American Willow Dr. and a future development parcel to the south, southeast. The existing neighborhood of The Willows at Grand Park duplexes are across Mountain Willow Drive to the northeast. The existing Willows duplexes are a simple and clean mountain cottage architectural style with an approximate height of 34' with a wooded area to the east largely screening the duplexes from US Hwy 40. The Willows Apartments are architecturally designed to integrate seamlessly with the existing architecture of the area. The apartments will be no more than 47' in height creating a slight step up between the 1 Willows Apartments Filing #1 (PA 2W.2) Preliminary Plat & FPDP duplexes and the mountain hillside to the west, but far less in height than the allowed 75' in this location. The open layout of the site plan is complimentary to the duplex site plans across the street. c. Impacts to Neighboring Properties The neighborhood is surrounded by planning area 23W undeveloped land on all sides. Planning Area 2W, the neighborhood, using the 30% density transfer allowance is entitled for 325 residences, 361 lodging units, and 39,000 sf of commercial space. The neighborhood currently has 55 residences constructed. The no more than 47' high apartment buildings that are spread out on the site with architecture similar to that of the existing residences integrates seamlessly in the neighborhood. The apartment buildings have been oriented so that the building sides face the existing duplexes with a great amount of open space spread throughout the site as opposed to a wall of apartments rising high above the existing duplex buildings with little or no space between buildings. At the closest location, the proposed apartment buildings are 36' from the Mountain WillowDr. ROW, allowing for a significant landscape buffer. The apartment community primary access points are on American Willow Dr. and Old VictoryRoad Not Mountain Willow Dr. Construction staging is planned to take place from the future Old Victory Road right of way area adjacent to the future development parcel and construction traffic will be asked to utilize just the access points off American Willow Drive and Old Victory Road. Upon completion of phase two Old Victory Road will be finished and paved. d. Natural Systems The design of the neighborhood is responsive to site features including natural topography to minimize disturbance to the land while maximizing views. A wetlands buffer exists adjacent to the site. The wetlands will not be disturbed. The existing Cozen ditch currently runs throughthe site. It will be realigned as depicted in the site plan design and incorporated as a landscape feature. This relocation of the Cozens Ditch has been approved by the Army Corps of Engineers. As part of the HUD submittal an additional environmental study was performed on the site and included in this submittal set. This study is not standard for Grand Park submittals and has been included as supplemental information in addition to the already existing master studies associated with the Grand ParkPDDP on file with the Town of Fraser. e. Code Conformance The proposed FPDP Amendment 2 for Planning Areas 2w and Preliminary Plat for Willows Apartments conforms to the approved PDDP and meets the requirements for FPDP and Preliminary Plat submittal. The following identifies conformance to the Town of Fraser PDDP, annexation agreement, and subdivision ordinance. 1. Land Use. Planning Area 2w currently provides for 250 residential units, 278 lodging units, and 30,000 sf of commercial all of which can be increased by 30% using the density transfer allowed for a maximum of 325 residential units, 361 lodging units, and 39,000 sf of commercial space with a 75' height limit. Currently, there are 9 single family homes and 46 existing duplexes in The Willows neighborhood leaving 270 residential units, 361 lodging units, and 39,000 sf of commercial space to be developed in Planning Area 2W with a maximum height of 75'. 2 Willows Apartments Filing #1 (PA 2W.2) Preliminary Plat & FPDP In order to achieve completion of both phases 9 residential units will be transferred to Planning Area 2w to address the density increase. This is less than the 75 units that may be transferred to Planning Area 2w. The 2w.2 Plan proposes 204 multi-family for-rent apartment units including 9 density transfers in to Planning Area 2w. The maximum height of the apartment buildings will be 45' far less than the allowed 75' height. The maximum remaining 66 residential units 361 lodging units, and 39,000 sf of commercial is reserved for and may be used for future development on 2w.3, 2w.4, and 2w.5. 2. Open Space. The PDDP requires 10% open space for the 2w parcel. The required open space total is 3.38 acres for all of planning area 2W. The existing Planning Area 2W.1 includes 3.4 acres of open spaces which satisfies all of the open space requirements for planning area 2W; however, Parcel 2w.2 includes 3.0 acres of open space for exceeding the planning area 2W open space requirement. Town of Fraser Code Section 19-4-165 establishing the following criteria for open space: "Avoidance of concentrating open space into large areas with the subsequent `packing'of residential areas"and "Open space and/or landscaping accompanies all types of developments." is met by the design of this plan. 3. Roadway Standard. The plan complies with the Town's roadway standards: 36' right of way with 10' snow storage and utility easements and a collector road right of way for American Willow Drive 60' in width all with two 10' travel lanes with 2' shoulders/mountable curbs. 4. Building Setback.The setbacks comply with the Grand Park PDDP. 5. Building Height. The multi-family apartment buildings will have a maximum height that is no more than 45' in height far less than the allowed 75' for this location, The clubhouse, garages, and dumpster enclosures will be less than the allowed 75' max building height requirement. f. Utilities 1. Utility locations for this site have been included in the Final Planned Development Plan for this subdivision and final civil engineering drawings will be coordinated with the Town of Fraser engineers and completed prior to the Final Plat recordation. 3 Willows Apartments Filing #1 (PA 2W.2) Preliminary Plat & FPDP 4 U-i UJ ui % N LU 0-6 2: < Oo6 wC)Nlm OG r < W —J < Lu(D z fl 00 N < 1, 7 < < < < u L ffi F. z 'JYZ5 0 0 ur z L 00 FN C14 z Z C11 O 0, 0 C4 C14 > z O Z 8 t "I llj I -Ll L 1 71 'o z Pi Z T'r j u I I T T I F T T Z IL U LU N LU 0-6ti� 2: 3:< LU Oo LIJ C)N < < 1z, < Z� Lu(D Fn� -r 00 u -j 0 f T T u f T rj y T L % C, al 1E, I., L A, n 4 Ai n 21 L r� T T T T 1 ------------ rl d T t z TT I T ---------- 7 7 77 7.7 L 9� T T T T T T T T T f T t T T T T T t t 1 1 - Oao Z Lf)adSLU 1-p,", 1 O ° Oat 0 LL> 3 . w oz u 2 I JO X W JQN I �,; O= ¢ W J Q pp 3N 1 Q I—IzLLI ,�w11 i Z �ry,QI' �� II'��U T W V Z oo J = Z 0 0 p a z° 0 OOl t 1• o I \ 1 / •'•an Mo��Nvo�.��""I ,. II 001 09 ry' Ow O ♦.�.� 1>N N p Z Oppk� 1 I o -- ♦ of II ��1/� �,, I `♦ pb I '� III ,�' 'E/ ♦ 1 �'J� 4 ;` ,♦ � Iii, 1 I'1 1` I 1 / \ \♦ I I vIJ "'SII II a ♦ Z 1 1 II k a0 I � / I � / I, I I I / � I - � I I w � I i •^� I 1 w 0 z ~ Z z } O OO O N N p w K U) u o z z z o 0 0 xx x u 0 Z w w w m Z 1 0 0 Lu x W i ; IIIIIIIIIIIIII W LLJ F- LLJ ..F— z U)LLJ C) LL ui N coq 0� co Lli Oo Lf)0- 3� < o�N wo (n LU z L'i C)N 2) WwN Cl) C14 < lzl Oa. 00 z Z 10 IC6 L ooa 001 09 W C'J LIJ < u CL < cn ti N ♦z I Cl) Lu z L 0 NT z Z< (N CD u Z_ u 1l O Z 0 L L, z z w z < 0- U) NZ ui IL 0 z 0 lo 0 o U 0 > 0 0 DO Lu Lu goo F- uj N F- Lf)c�N LU 0-6 2 3:<'~ Oo zo L'i JC)N < W <C<l z ryo x (D :E; 001 o Lu(D 'n -r z— 00 -j og z 10 < 0 0 '0 > '0 H F- A Cl - 4- 7 Al Ll n P 0 A z J 55 O d N '\; '�,'y;/�- 1'� ',"�""'�I"r _ u �"'�IIIII'�iw 1�, 6 n Q LU Lz, uj Ut < -0 4 Z= V) 0 !2 < r) % I - Z 0 1 69 W < Lu V VIII LU (D 0 0 0 LU LL rr weww V) CL L W nw `a N Z �I^)yc�N W -6 ° Oat oo :a�___..� ',- S le W JQN Q ,BZW „0N �QoQG 001 00 J f � OS LU Al U Y _ - "" mNN�'Villi � Q / Vloi"uuu' �ullll j Q u rc 0 'A Z BOJ / a a a II w 9 r it II ��ryryN � Q IV i�;ipu��uo IIIIIIII�qM�Illll pp�u!p�VlI^IIM ollwu l„„uv 'I i A 00I0 _ W o w wo N r Q w = Z nm �^ dIC' 00 p �` = a o o a V��IIII�. a r) z o f p ulll � WW Q U r, m ° 3 0 It Q Q w ¢ o I N JIQ CLW I I I Q O o O � G O O J I I I n a goo az LU LU ry" Q r� 0- N x U) LU ��d3 a 2: 3:Qti ° O Oo w JQN 1 No J < 2!Uj z � zp Q �< g gLu I�1 o_ -r — 00 gci J = Z ~ Z a z GOZ �O z o � U 4Y"'"r r ii oo! OS '1 R U ` � U Ot` jtF ADJ Z 0 a �d Q U � G o^ z W Z U c a a.. m N 2 rc F z w a w W Ov 0 Z= Oa o 0 `tom w u o 0 r z a- W LU 0- u Ln Lo C2 LU 0-6 0- 2 3:<� LIJC)r < LU < C < 2:L�j Q� < io w__ ry QQ Z, 0 z Va LU Luuz 00 -j < 0, 0 CL 0 < E, 1'�/ o z LD > '0 U C, 6 0 q-, oz F, < F LD z .............. zo x r E ,_77 610 0 < �z z 0 C, 0 x 2 < z Q > p < z Rk z 0 12 z z 0 0 w0 W w t wm 0 0 > > r1N1 Iz 0 T z 0&5 z z < goo aL LU 0- u N Y a to (nDC0-6 N LU 2: 3:< H 0 00 C)N No 2: -1< z< UJ 0 -2 <C<1 raw ryo x 75 m tow", 00 < M 001 goat: syvs ng 1 6 Hold; 1p oil Stan SZ HIS 06 it it, 0 tv -0 LD z T zU 10 rt................... aa' /* -1&0 6 w1H U MST 1Ar 0 HBO A Al 1 IS O zw zw g Lo `= LU J zn _ `d'a@46111 p'I Mill Iko hll I6I I„ a o N I��1111111J��I�I��IIIIIIIIIII t J�'w � NW `a it Y�) A III IIII IVII al II1 -' _ o Zi = M!!hr N IIII i1 II II iiM W1" N" = U Z Lf) N w IyIIvPlY 1111'.i'Y��III I;IIIIII IVI it.i ill I p�M�l,lpil 'i u 61 J w 10 W �y�0-6Y W J �� .G AG a g 5 oo A�Im ldl p w ( i �" Z 0 J a w M v w OJ Q N 2—, dlgl 11!111111" �� II''I '1 jjllIIIIIiI,IW _ a = w a s J Q a 1llilifl G dryI'6 '1'Mlli 11�v�ll o C7 w q Z <Q X, Lu ,,III,IIIdVV1h Pi u, J •• oU Q LU ryo a W(DH "n z 09 0 OC . .,. IF NX , r I I E �I o CL W w W ~ J I aL (D N Lf)� < 12u: 3: Q a 0 z L'i C)N 6 2: < !a < UJ < ry, i; Qx Z, go L (D u z 00 < LD 09 ci OC 'A CL 4* -Lj I L Ci CL i X04 0 ........ LU U) 0 CL .% CL Lu U-J (D LU 2: 0 009 >0w o0c lu =N U)cC N LU0-6 T 2: 3:< H �00 LU U Boz co 0 (3 D CL 0 N oho LLJ 1 2: z.11 < z< W <Q mho 1z, ga=te Lu 0 n ul0 9--z < 0 NAV AO 00. O z,w, z OD 3� w wl < I 1 i za gmo aw N g z=F x Q LU 2: 3:Q CL .,o I 1 0-6Opc7 z 0z�LL � i p ✓/t , i Z W J N FO: .p p < J Q w a Q HZW �ja ?zo r ?r Z `!�Q oaZ �' 1 g �� ;, LU(D o�� z zg •k, ? rig I ~I 4 6 ar��,r,l 1I J� II II +Iq I 'I ,ti I' 'il I "Ir I IpI I i . k>� I J IIII yl �y I I I, �I � \ gmo aw I J_ x � N o {II 0 W V)Q �o motero ' Lu Z OQN ° o Q JzQ www Z �<Q g (�1 a WV Zo00 =�z ?� Q Z Qg x� zo i a z F �I ff{ ` r t � m r � III � i I I nil J Si 'III I 1 I' � II II �I I I II „t 4�I I --------------------------------------------- OGVHOIOO'AiNnoo GNVaE) N d H19'MgLH'S U'6Z 03S VON 9NI-11d 3NOO L NHVd GNV21E)IV SIN3Ni'dVdV SMO-RM 9 d 9- 6 9'�o 6 T t 8 R'�'��99 -2 -.OWN"'q " 0 eaa LU 6, b� t2 T Z @- 52,, z� 6 z x z? U) 0 ui 0 z M F- LL ry z 0 0 F- 0 -J U) (.) O Lij LL U- 3: Ln 00 p F- C'4 ......0'� T — uy W< Lij r) z U) < z x c 'r Z 7 < aL < C7 w CK (D Z LL CL U) < 0 N 0) Cl) 0 LUS F- LU z o' z U) uj z 0 U uj < z LL 0PdNi U- co 9. 0 uj Z U) 3: we lw U- 0 LL Taw a < U) < X LU 6 7. LU ' LL < IL s vT < I z6 2 as a t s '6 t 7" T, t E 8 @9 O of -s8 - - o so - 0 z� OGVHOIOO'AiNnoo GNVaE) M d H19 M9LH'SU'6Z 03S ON DNI�H 3No:) o LNHVd GNV210IV SIN3Ni'dVdV SMO-RM ow < LUry _j IL C) z X U) = o F- < OLL0 ry O -J (n W LL 3: LL in Q Z P ry < (D D (D `" / 0 LL < U) 0 F- LU z U) ui z 0 C) W < crN <�U) a- < z D� U- 0 U- C) 0 0 w Z U) U- 0 0 LL _j < U) W LU LL ILI/, O(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONVLJD 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S ON 9NIIIJ 3NO01 )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii:WdV SMOITM J—d J� LU q J z X 0 LLI (D LL of 0 0 ryyh Z -j — H 0 -J CO U r LL LOL 3. U-) r- ui IA < ui a- CD z C) < ci < Z >- ry PT- z U) 0LL < Lu Z w z 0 C) 0 W < G64� a- < z LL U) 0 F- 0 L) 0 Lij Z U) ` /�� LL 0 0 F-- U) LLJ ow W U- 5 0 n 2 0 t < z -- O(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONVLJD 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S ON 9NIIIJ 3NO01 )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii1VdV SMOITM LU 5; --------- IF -=T----------------- L) z n. x LU 0 Ir z 0 LLI LL LL r— UJ F- < LIJ < Z co C) < Of ci Z < U) 0 Lu Z i w z 0 C) QQ< < z LL F-OL) 0 Lli z LL 0 0 F- uj ui uv 10 0(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONVLJO 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S VON ONITJ 3NO:) l )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii:WdV SMOITM LU L) Z X YLIff D LL of 0 -j z —J CO LLI LL U-) 0 r— LU < W CD C) z < Of Z P T- (D z 0 LL 5P5 U) < 0 0.7 Lu Z w z 0 3: C) 0 W cj� CO < G� a- 64 lL < Z LL U) 0 LL F- 0 L) 0 Lij Z U) ol LL 0 LL <U) uj ui j%' O(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONVLJD 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S ON 9NIIIJ 3NO01 )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii1VdV SMOITM LU z n. v-, X ILI L, 0 Ly (D 0 Z 0 LLI LL L 9 U-) OL r ui azo z QQ C) < z (D z LL U) 0 Lu Z a w z 0 0 —H W < Gf IL C, Z < z LL 00 U) 0 LL F- 0 L) 0111 U LL 0 0 F-- LILL U) LLJ ui LL 0 om OGVHOIOO'AiNnoo GNVaE) N d H19'M9L'8'S U'6Z 03S Z'ON 9NI-11=1 3NOO L NHVd GNV21E)IV SIN3Ni'dVdV SMO-RM 19 T T z 2 'P F z z 39 0 LU nx. s �� -9 "!'s'ng 07 IL z g zo z z <kw 2w �agoz-z o dc 1E 1z dz' T z el 7 9 z 'z z -E .H U) 0 M ui 0 z F- LL ry -J U) 0 0 F- 0(.) z� '- UUJ LL 00 z - uy Ln p- LIJ < Lij F- rl N. z U) gQ � Z C7 U —goo CKU) LLwppx < �V z-,3 CL N F- LU F = z CL uj z 0 w. F— 0 LLJ zLL 1 < z LL 7 o V) 0 co 9'. aE LL 0 w Z -j U) U- 0 0 z. U) 2, W z z w 7 z Z z LL J0 6� oi IL Si z < z 2 z I -H Z 9 --7 2 z 9 @9 '' �u sI or z� z z z' z, < z� z' 14� T "u 'T z OGVHOIOO'AiNnoo GNVaE) N d H19'M9L'8'S U'6Z 03S Z'ON 9NI-11=1 3NOO Lo Mill-,I�d NHVd GNV2iE)IV SIN3Ni'dVdV SMO-RM ow ry LU IL ---- C) z U) ui 0 < ry OLL 0 F- 0 is -J U) W U- 3: LL 3. Ln FIR < w z U) C) < Z ty P = < ry I d / I 0 LL U) 0 F- LU z U) I y4 CL W 0 F- W < cr� -pq < z LL ) 0 F- U- C) 0 0 w z -j U) U- 0 0 LL U) W W LL 0 I/, 1e 11 IN O(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONV�JD 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S z 3NO01 ON DNI�IJ )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii:WdV SMOITM LU L) fV z x 0 . 1. 2 0 LL of 0 Z 0 C/) LLI LL O YAW w < ui CD < z V) Of ci < T- z U) 0 U-) Lu F- =F z C� co =) a- z ui z 0 2: 3: () 0 W < a- C, < z LL u LL 0 w z -i U) 3: LL 0 0 F-- LL .... ........... W LL e------ O(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONVLJD 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S z 3NO01 ON DNIlIJ )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii:WdV SMOITM LU Z x LU 0 LLof 0 0 -j C/) Wj U- LL U-) ui ry P— < ui CD z V) < ci Z SPT 0 z LL U) u) aw LU Z D W z 0 C) :�Y :c 0 W < C/) a- C, < z LL U) U- 0 L) 0 WZ U) U-0 0 F-- LL U) ui ui k" ol oz, O(mJOlO3'AINnoo ONVLJD 'IN d Hi9'M9)8'S[i'6Z'03S z 3NO01 ON DNI�IJ )4HVd(INVHE)IV SIN3Aii:WdV SMOITM LU Z_ Lu 0 C5 of ----------------- LL Z 0 0 —i ----------------------- 0 LU () LL ui F- LIJ < CD Q< < C2 of Z 2 Z 0 10 Lr) U) - Z F- — LU W Z F- Z 0 QOMrr w < of C, z LL 0 9 LL F- 0 L) W z U) 3: U- 0 0 F- LL U) w w 51 LL 0 2 91 v ~ pr '!!VIVVIIUN'm'nllAdliii'I jjir'i�iil a -• r ml iVliu 411Vitlii 1N5 ASVuivil COILORADO September 23, 2021 Catherine E. Trotter, AICP Fraser Town Planner Town of Fraser 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 RE: Willows Apartments— Public Works 2�d Review Comments Dear Ms. Trotter: Public Works along with their engineering consultants have reviewed the second engineering submittal for the Willows Apartments. Below is a summary of the comments and additional comments. The consultant's comment letters are attached. American Willow Drive The proposed extension of American Willow Drive will not be allowed to connect to the intersection of US 40 and Rendezvous Road at this time. This potentially will bisect the Town of Fraser's Conservation Easement that is required by the Annexation Agreement. This connection will have to be reevaluated at a later date and what requirements will be required. Old Victory Road As stated in the first review comments, the right of way for all of Old Victory Road between Mountain Willow Drive and the intersection at Kings Crossing Road is required to be dedicated to the Town of Fraser as part of this project. It shall also be constructed and paved with Filing 1. A proposed phasing plan can be presented but a gap in the roadway shall not be left unpaved after Filing 1 is constructed. The right of way dedication shall be included as part of this project and the roadway construction plans shall be included within the construction plans for this project. Offsite Utilities As stated in the first review comments, with this development or any other new development within Grand Park that drains to the Forest Meadows sewer basin, the Town's downstream collection system capacity will exceed the Town's design criteria. As part of this project, a new sewer crossing of US 40 shall be designed and constructed with Filing 1. The construction plans for the sewer line shall be included in the construction plans for this project. Once „',ui""n i ,,,,,,,, constructed, the Grand Park subdivision shall be disconnected from the Forest Meadows sewer system and will connect onto this new US 40 crossing. Stormwater There are still comments and questions from the town's engineering consultant regarding stormwater. Utilities There are still comments from the town's engineering consultant regarding the utilities. Sincerely, Russell W. Pennington, P.E. Public Works Director :11N112 9ic4 �u p„II II^M it w'd",:;Cd do N'dzic; !,tl';;V'vini coo ❑❑❑ 2480 W. 2611 Avenue, Unit B225 Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 July 7, 2021 www.merrick.com Russell Pennington, P.E., Public Works Director Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 RE: GRAND PARK, THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Dear Mr. Pennington: We have reviewed The Willows Apartments submittal, including the 90% Construction Plans, dated June 11, 2021 by TKE Civil & Structural Engineering. We have the following comments related to the proposed water and sewer systems: Offsite Utilities With this development, the Town's downstream collection system capacity will exceed the Town's design criteria. Recent analysis, per our email of June 1 st, showed that 3 downstream reaches currently exceed 50 percent capacity. The addition of the Willows Apartments will overload an additional 5 reaches of the FM sewer shed and 2 reaches of the CM sewer shed. Prior to adding this project, the new sewer crossing of US 40 should be designed and constructed. Once constructed, the CM sewers would be disconnected from the Forest Meadows sewer system and diverted to this new US 40 crossing. It is noted that the Willows Apartments as proposed plans for 258 EQR, approximately twice the original master plan for this area. American Willow Drive As required for a collector roadway, the ROW for American Willow Drive has been increased from 36 feet to 60 feet. It is noted that this has significantly decreased setbacks to the proposed buildings; for example, the Ski Storage building has a setback of less than 5 feet. See the enclosed excerpt from Sheet 13, Site Plan-Phase 1. Old Victory Road While it is not clear due to the shading/hatch patterns used not being consistent, the paving (and right of way if not already dedicated) for Old Victory Road should be completed to the southeast limits of the property. Construction Plans While most of the review comments for the 80 percent submittal have been addressed, the following issues remain (see enclosed Sheets 39 and 40 from previous review): 1 1. Sheet 39 i. Straighten pipe runs to minimize deflections in fittings. Good design and construction practice should minimize the number of bends required, typically resulting in less future maintenance. ii. Show all pipe/utility crossings. iii. Overlapping text— difficult to read. 2. Sheet 40 i. As for Sheet 39, iii above, straighten pipe runs to minimize deflections in fittings. Please advise if you have any questions. Sincerely, MERRICK & COMPANY �,.iAllen Jod Terrence P. Kenyon,"'P.E. cc: Adam Cwiklin, CWP, Town of Fraser Water and Wastewater Superintendent 2 coo ❑❑❑ July 7, 2021 2480 W. 2611 Avenue, Unit B225 Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 Russell Pennington, P.E., Public Works Director www.merrick.com Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 RE: GRAND PARK, THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS 90% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DRAINAGE REVIEW Dear Mr. Pennington: We have reviewed The Grand Park- Willows Apartments submittal received June 11, 2021. The submittal included the Grand Park—Willows Filing 1-3 &Willows Apartments Phase III Drainage Report (90% version) and 90% Construction Plans for Grand Park — The Willows Apartments, dated June 10, 2021 by TKE Civil & Structural Engineering. We also received a response letter dated June 10, 2021 by TKE Engineering. We have the following comments to offer related to the drainage improvements. Drainage Report Text 1. At the bottom of Page 3 in Section III, it states that this site "is located within drainage basin ET' and that "this basin is to drain to the northwest to Design Point 7". Provide excerpts and the Drainage Map from the 2006 High Country Engineering report to show the proposed drainage route and where these features are located. 2. At the top of Page 4, it states that this development is located within the Carrol & Lange drainage Basin H and will be combined with runoff from the No Name channel and directed to DP7 located adjacent to Old Victory Road north of the Cozens Meadow detention pond. Provide excerpts and the Drainage Map from the 2005 Carrol & Lange report to show the proposed drainage route and where these features are located. 3. On Page 5, for Design Point 5, it states that the tributary area will drain into the meadow without water quality treatment until the roadway is extended in the future. We have the following comments: a. On the Drainage Map, fix the major contour labels in these basins. b. On the Drainage Map, the basin boundary between DA-W09 and DA-W10 is not drawn correctly per the contours. It appears that the basin divide is located through the center of the large building and that at least half of the building and the circular driveway area flows to American Willows Drive. Fix the basin divide as defined by the proposed contours. c. Per CDPHE criteria, a maximum of 1 acre of impervious area is allowed to runoff from a site without water quality treatment. The drainage area for Basins DA-W09 and DA-W10 1 is about 2 acres which exceeds the maximum allowable area, therefore, water quality treatment must be provided. d. With the basin boundary correction per Comment 3b, Basin DA-W09 will be reduced to less than 1 acre so this basin could drain to the meadow without water quality treatment. e. For the remaining area that flows to Design Point 5, a permanent water quality pond must be provided. Upon approval of a variance by the Town, a temporary sediment trap could be provided for the interim condition until the future water quality pond is constructed with the roadway extension. 4. On Page 5, for Design Point 8, it states that Cozen's Ditch crosses Mountain Willow Drive, but it appears to cross American Willow Drive per the Drainage Map. Revise as needed. 5. On Page 5, from the drainage map it appears that runoff from DA-W14 and DA-W15 flow to a low point in the driveway/parking lot, which then spills over the curb and is routed overland to a swale. At the swale, the runoff is combined with the Design Point 2 runoff, then routed to Design Point 3. Describe this in the text. Also, erosion protection for these curb overflows must be provided on the relatively steep slope. 6. On Page 5, for Water Quality Pond 2, providing water quality storage for DP-OS runoff in lieu of treating the DP-2 runoff is proposed. This is not acceptable. Water quality storage must be sized for all of the runoff routed through a pond, regardless if the runoff is from offsite or onsite, otherwise the pond will not operate properly. In addition, runoff to DP-OS cannot be treated in lieu of the runoff to DP-2. Water quality storage must be provided for the runoff to DP-2 which includes buildings, roadways, and parking lot areas. We recommend locating the water quality storage control at Design Point 3 (upstream end of the proposed culvert) to provide water quality treatment for the runoff to DP-2. 7. On Page 5, for Design Point 9, it indicates that 10 cfs in the 100-year storm event will be allowed to bypass Feature Pond 4, which exceeds the Ditch decreed flow of 5 cfs. Only 5 cfs should bypass this pond and the remaining runoff should be detained in the pond to reduce the 100-year peak flow to the historic flow rate. 8. On Page 6, discuss the proposed culvert that outfalls near Design Point 1A 9. From the response letter we understand that the amenity "ponds were previously approved". Clarify who previously approved the ponds. Also, if these ponds are still planned to permanently store stormwater, provide documentation that the State Engineers Office has approved the amenity ponds and an augmentation plan has been established since these ponds will not meet the requirements of Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 37-92-602(8) that requires all stormwater for the 5 and 100-year storm events to be released within a maximum time period. Drainage Map 10. Include copies of the Drainage Map Overall and Drainage Map (Sheets 3 and 4) in Appendix D. 11. On Sheet 3 (Drainage Map Overall), label the "No Name" channel, Cozen's Ditch, and the existing wetland/detention ponds. Also label the "northern" wetland mitigation/detention ponds if these are not the same as the "existing" wetland/detention ponds. 2 12. On Sheet 4,just north of the Mountain Willow Drive and Old Victory Road intersection, revise the existing culvert label to indicate 6-24" RCP's instead of 5 to match the report text and number of culverts shown. 13. On Sheet 4, label all of the proposed storm pipe and culvert sizes. 14. Show and label the existing Cozen's ditch culverts across the Bluestem Ct. cul-de-sac and across the trail near the Feature Pond (No Stormwater). 15. The tributary area for Basins DA-J, DA-K, and DA-L are all labeled to be 0.11 acres which does not appear to be correct. Correct these areas as needed. 16. Subdivide Basin DA-J to correctly account for runoff that must be directed to Feature Pond 4 at the diversion structure. Update the HEC-HMS analysis to account for this revision. 17. It appears that this project has the potential for disturbing existing wetlands areas/Waters of the U.S. Show the wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas on the Drainage Map. If so, the proposed fill within the wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas must be approved by the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) by obtaining a 404 wetlands permit. Provide documentation that a permit has been obtained or that it is not required. Calculations 18. For the Detention Pond analyses, we have the following comments: a. The NOAA Atlas 60-minute (1 hour) rainfall duration was used to for the MH FD-Detention analysis, but per the Grand County Storm Drainage Design and Technical Criteria Manual, the 2-hour rainfall duration must be used. Revise the pond sizing analyses to use the 2- hour rainfall duration. b. The first page of the pond sizing analysis uses the MHFD-Detention Detention Basin Stage-Storage Table Builder spreadsheet. Instead of switching to use a TKE developed spreadsheet, continue to use the MHFD-Detention spreadsheet to size the pond outlets. In addition, the MHFD-Detention spreadsheet must be used for the pond sizing analysis since it provides the 95% and 99% drain times for each storm event which is needed to verify that the Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 37-92-602(8) criteria is met. c. Provide the Detention Basin Stage-Storage Table Builder page for Ponds 2 and 3, not just Ponds 1 and 4. d. For Ponds 1, 2, and 3, the WQCV drain times are all less than 40 hours. Revise the orifice sizing to increase the drain times to at least 40 hours. e. For Pond 1, the 100-year drain time is only a few hours more than the WQCV drain time which is not reasonable. Revise the analysis as needed to determine reasonable results. f. For both Pond 1 and Pond 4, the Pond Release rates (from HEC-HMS) indicate that the developed release rates and much higher than the historic release rates. Revise the pond outlets to reduce the 10-year and 100-year peak flows to the 100-year historic flow rates. 19. For the channel capacity calculations, also provide calculations for the swale located in Basins DA-W01 and DA-W19, at the outfall of the DP-2 culvert to Design Point 3, and at the outfall of the DP-3 culvert to Design Point 9. 20. Provide inlet and storm sewer sizing calculations for all of the proposed storm sewers, such as at DP-OS and for the Building J 18" RCP. We understand that these will be provided with the next submittal. 3 21. Provide culvert sizing calculations for all of the proposed culverts, not just for the triple 24" under Mountain Willow Drive. Also include calculations for the existing trail, roadway, and cul-de-sac crossings to verify they have adequate capacity. We understand that these will be provided with the next submittal. 22. Provide riprap sizing calculations. We understand that these will be provided with the next submittal. 23. At all storm sewer sump locations, provide emergency overflow calculations to determine the depth of overtopping assuming the inlets are plugged. Verify that the overflows will be contained within drainage easements and that there is at least 1 foot of freeboard to the finished grade for adjacent structures. Construction Plans 24. Update Sheets 3 and 4 Drainage Maps per the above comments. 25. There are several sheets that do not show the north end of the site at the intersection of Mountain Willow Drive and Old Victory Road. Adjust the view port or add another sheet to show this area for the Existing Conditions & Demolition, Site Plans, Horizontal Control Plan, Stormwater Management Plan, Grading Plans, Roadway Alignment Map, Signage & Striping Plan, and Utility Plans. 26. For all of the detention ponds, we have the following comments: a. For all of the detailed detention pond grading drawings, label the existing and proposed contours. b. Provide forebays at all storm sewer and culvert outfalls into the ponds. c. Provide trickle channels. Include spot elevations to define the trickle channel inverts. Note that at the micropools, the trickle channel inverts must be at least 4 inches above the micropool water surface elevation. d. Provide minimum 2% cross slopes to the trickle channels in the pond bottoms. Grading the bottoms flat, such as shown for Pond 4, is not acceptable. e. At Pond 1 address the following: i. Revise the embankment alignment on the east end to allow sufficient space for runoff from Narrowleaf Ct. to drain properly into the pond instead of directing flow at the pond embankment. ii. It appears that some grading will be required at the western end of the pond to provide positive drainage to the outlet structure and eliminate potential sump areas in the pond bottom. Revise the grading as needed. iii. Verify that a minimum of 1 foot of freeboard is available above the emergency spillway flow elevation to the existing structures, especially at the western end of the pond where the structures are at a lower elevation. f. At Pond 4, for the diversion structure, extend the proposed riprap down to the toe of slope. g. On Sheet 10, in Generic Section — Pond 1-3, the micropool must be shown to be 2.5' deep, not 1' deep. 4 h. Provide trash racks/well screen to protect the orifice holes from plugging with debris. i. For Pond 1, provide a control to reduce the 100-year flow to the historic rate. 27. On Sheet 11, update the existing conditions to only reflect the improvements that have already been constructed at the site. Do not show the new trails at Pond 1 and Pond 2 and proposed Ponds 3 and 4. 28. On Sheet 18 Grading Plan Overall, per the contours it appears that the available flow depth at the following structures is minimal. Verify that the finished floor elevations (including any proposed basements) for all structures are above the proposed 100-year water surface plus at least 1 foot of freeboard. Backwater at culverts must also be considered. a. Based on the existing condition contours, there appears to only be about 2 feet of depth (or less)from the existing Cozen Ditch invert to the existing structures along the east side of Mountain Willow Drive between Bluestem Ct. and American Willow Drive. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, MERRICK & COMPANY i Jeanne M. Boyle, P.E., CFM 5 EAST GRAND FIR9 PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 4 P.O. Box 2967 -,Winter Park, Colorado 80482 (970) 726-5824,t Fax(970)726-5938e www.eastgrandfire.com Ms. Catherine Trotter, 3/25/2021 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Willows Apartments Preliminary Plat. We have included(attached) a copy of East Grand Fire Districts 2021 "Development Review Crit &' for the Town of Fraser and Developer to reference. Special attention to utility locations,wildfire hazard mitigation, access,and municipal water supply is necessary for the protection of lives and property. Upon initial review access into Willows Apartments via American Willow Drive and Old Victory Road appear to meet requirements provided it continues to meet Intercity Bus(BUS-45) requirements. Width of the roads and sidewalks seem.adequate provided there is no parking on eight side of roadway at any time. The drive ways/parking lots are 24' wide with no shoulders(4' required both sides). Given the narrower operating areas in the drive way/parking lots please make sure that turns,in these areas will accommodate EGFD apparatus turning radius(copy of radius attached). Grade of all roads is good. Hydrants seem to be reasonably spaced to meet requirements and worked through during previous meetings, Water supply in this area should meet the needs of fire suppression,pressures and flows but will need to be revied by an engineer. Due to the nature of the occupancy, all residential and assembly buildings will require an alarm system as well as a fire suppression sprinkler systein designed and installed according to NFPA 13 Standards. Special attention should be given to s c Fire Department Connection.and Riser Room placement allowing easy unobstructed fire personal access. Thank, You, Dennis K. Soles Fire Marshal East Grand Fire Protection District EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 4 P.O. Box 2967-Winter Park, Colorado 80482 (970) 726-5824- Fax(970)726-5938-www.oastgrandfire.com EAST"GRAND FIRE PRO TECTH)N DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CRITERIA Standards and Codes to be used:NFPA.,IFC,IBC,IRC,AASHT0,Mountain Parks Electric,and Public Service (Xcel),East Grand Fire Protection District-SOG. International Fire Code(IFC):2015 International Building Code(IBC):201.5 International Residential Code(IRC):2015 NFPA Standards: 13,24,25, 101,299, 1.142(and others-most,current) ACCESS: In addition to: IFC Appendix D,NFPA Standard 299-Protection of Life and Property from Wildfire and the road standards of Fraser,Town of Winter Park,or Grand County. ROADWAYS:Minimum width 24 ft.with a hard-all-weather surface sufficient to support 84,000 lbs.fire apparatus. Shoulders to be a minimum width of 4 ft.on each side, Vertical clearance to be a minimum of 18 fl. . grade to be 7%.Minimum curve radiuses to be 50 ft.measured at centerline,or follow the AASHTO geometric designs for highways and streets manual,for Intercity Bus (DUS-45)°At 750 ft.intervals Emergency turnarounds for fire apparatus are needed on all roads. (These can be oversized driveways,intersections or specially constructed areas). No parking is to be allowed along 24-foot roadways."No Parking"signage will be required along both sides of road with required signs provided by the developer. If parking is to be allow 4 9ft.needs to be added to width of road on ether or both sides of roadway in addition to signage. Cul-de-Sacs ate to be avoided.If unavoidable the ran urn length of cul-de-Sac shall be no more than 500 feet.A turnaround at end of Cul-de-Sac,with the continuation of 24 ft°road width,shall have 1,04 ft°minimum outside diameter.Cul-de-Sacs, turnarounds,and shoulders shall not be used for snow storage if it reduces access in any way, To avoid building construction delays special attention should be given to IFC Chapters 14 and 5, Sections 1410, 1412,501,503,505,and 508. GATES:Gates are to be avoided,but if necessary,shall be,considered on a case-by-case basis. If allowed, the design would need to be approved prior to construction.Gate should consist of a counterweight type barrier that swings completely free of the access when released.A"KNOX"key switch,or other approved device, shall operate the gate electronically, DRIVE WAYS and ACCES S;Three homes(dwelling units)or more require a road,not a driveway. The minimum driveway width should be 14 ft,with two I ft shoulders. If the access or drive extends more than, 150 ft.from a roadway there shall be a turnaround adequate for our trucks. BRIDGES:Require a letter from an engineer with his or her stamp certifying that the bridge meets the requirements of the International Fire Code Section 503.2,6 which requires the bridge to be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB 17"Standard Specification for Highway Bridges,"Appendix D Section DI 02(as amended by EGFD)suggests the bridge be capable of carrying the load of 84,000 lbs.Any crossings shall be constructed to the same standards as the traveled way on either side. 1 WAI"I'T N131111'11"'L,`- M LINICTRAL,! RU,4emmwe Apl,:wndix B of International Fire Code, Water supplliir�*; rlex�xied Rn firefiglifing,would rntg,4!,e between 3500 gallonsper mdrlute lig-e fl Ow get a tri jx1ftnuin.25()0 gal Ions f'or fluee fx-jurs(I'l-kinirrann,6310,000 �Pjallons lc:&fire protif�' per,ininute fi,wr two hrmits(minfiriUm 300,000 gallons(,Wfire proh'u.",tion sumnige).A miuilnum water mxilply Df 1500 g,.aNlcpns per afiamate imrd, flow fi,.w twii,hciun�(nniriinmnxi J[io,000 jgalkms of"ifile willble,cimsid(,mtd in buildings prott'(11ted by Fire supt)ression Sprinkler 3 wouLd ble, nei,,.Aed tb,A admjuat fkrws will be availalAe fixna t1ke waler,SYMeln atz residual press,11re T.u.:1 less thar.1 20 Psi, R5, inst'allilag firr,sprinkler systmns in all shu(Atut�,,-%"iny fil"k,01'proputy km;ses would The avoidtxi and w(:ndd make be�;I�t ust�of dw avail,,ible water Fire hydrants are u.�be lmuated at leer eve'ry 51(Y)fl. or ai,�,,agrecd to f.vy the Fire District.Fire hydiatit kx,,,afions,and distrilbiatkyn ;hall be iri=,*rdunce with C(.A'tbe International Fim Co& rds of For planning purposes,fbe fkOjowing nmy be vised, Fire hydiffints gnust Isu"xI the zxXI"airew"xi 1110"',loc"'al water purvey(Jr/water,auth4-wity,or be MAmik-m-Sulm.,x rjr.iog:j 250A.423(:);T-equivalclit to be installed do hydiranthaving 1A lcilst�x:w�4 14 iw�,Tl NST ojp(,�,ning f4cki,g the Roaxi. Hydrants are whe kx:Ail water at-Alwority"s requirernent.Fire 15dnwt insta 18fion 4,vutsi(le Cd'a Wliter Ai th(.,mity's jurisdiction Aliall be mquirexi.tolbe a(.,,,c(,q)1ab)c Wl',',ast(3rax.0 Fire E)istrid, "i i° to tho, hydrant is to tw,a leve.[-walkitq,!,�stwfiftce.freOf" obstructions or depressk:ms" atlir,,,ast f"I've, fleet Wide,Exxvin the Ilydrant,in all dirvelimu., including the bkkside, ExisHng Frd Hydrmj[,As cairn be(,-avdited fiw a ntm developizu-13t if'dle bydrwit lias at least orie 4.5-4,ri,ch iaperljnrga 6-inch.Imarre-1, is in gcx.A,rq'Nau." 'is appropl-iatt-ly acct,%s,has adequatt,,—flows,and is not ffany one(ff these conditions is not rrilef,it,will.rieed to bevephtC,4�'(J, Firt,�Codetables B105A and C105„I pvrvide Cklrfkr�gUjcL,,,jxjce ott(lows and fire,bydrant distribution. Rjjp, caleulate.d wrx,)unt of'water storage necumaty f"or structun,"Al fire or at least 30,000 galkins;dX fire pj'ytg,cjjw.x water stonige which is the mi:rxiwnal amount I i C'e, hisurance Se�vices Off Pa�fl,qN«tda.,umndrtl d 9 d iwduflww � fld�a i Nd rw r e au"mar�tdwmudra n a arwrdutNdbdu r.at' mNN �wtp ni r" Nad m e:dx� r�dd�ouifl�unmN ad wnr� "o,olkJ dAlmvm2tfrom p1;e, snow, "',nwi ,velficles. Afl unlity rneters Shut do dle ex�II"rior of'a builcinj,, sbaH De pr()'RNAC%,� fix",n IIIH6q�, kx!alhi ro. ix rca.acffly avaiW,0A,.% WILDFIRE 'lliere is Wfldfire,, pr(,tjea 14onnal prcm,,mutions de(bnsible ,sT,)aV1 anxtrul bitildTrigs, inigatecl gniss, i.,riowing,lmirthnizirxjx any inflaiurnaifle vegetafion,,arid gu"wilig Corribuslibles/flamn.mbles,awayfixirn tjj(,J)uj1(,jjztgs would 11C11) h4aking tlm exterior walls an&roof,,:r would cortainly rninfinizz dw risk. t;.:'010'subing,with 1.C.0 wil(flaw]I Jibmart Interflux,,Ckxie i.s enwaxage(L 14 J Dennis K.Soles Fire Marshal East Grand Fire Protection District 2 4/3/2007 Turning Performance Analysis iiilouuuuuuu Represevatativc Kerber,Wayne Configuraflow East Grand Velovily 100'Phalbrin Cirganizaflon.- Front Range l`irc Apparatus.,Ltd Number: 11"?1955494-1111 V: l 69 Deparl[ment: East Grand Fire Parameters: hiside Cramp An&: 45" Axle Tr,,wk; 85,34" Wheel Offiset: 4,68" JXoc 6 un of,r C, aP", Lmaded Tire Width: 17.70" Chassis Overhang: 79,62" W�Iec�O VISO W 0 ram 0 A n a$0 Additional Burnper Depth: 16.00" s I Xaad W idwm Front Overhang 124.60" Wheelbase: 2790)" Calculated Turning Radik Inside Turm 265A7' C'urb to Curb: 47143" W 11 P*;b WW Wall to Wall: 552,88" Aerial Application w Mlice ir� Rai 4J^ 10 Components Rem it Description Front Axle (10 18,453 —axle,SUspension.FronL,Oshkosh TAK-4,Non-Drive.22,800 It) Front Wheels M 11,380 Aftimirturn.,Alcoa,22,50 x 12,25 Fronf'I ires 01 1137 l Michelin,425/651222.50,20 Pky� XZY-3 Chassis 0121631 Velocity C,hassis Front Bumper 012:36x47 Tray,Bumper,(,'enter.Standard,35"W x 11,5"1,N 13"D Aerial Device 0022160 Aerial, 100'Pierce Platform Notes: Actual Inside Cramp Angle may be less due to highly specialized options. Curb to C'urb turning radjUS,calculated R)r a 9.00 Inch curb. As of 4/3/2007 12:315:191°104 llagc 1 ol'2 C'OnfigUralion Version: 169 4/3/2007 Representative: .......... Turning Performance Analysis Representative: Kerber,Wayne Configuration: East Grand Velocity 100'Platform Organization: Front Range Fire Apparatus,Ltd Number: EP1955494-101 V: 169 Department: East Grand Fire Definitions: Inside Cramp Angle Maximum turning angle of the front inside tire. Axle Track King-pin to king-pin distance of the front axle. Wheel Offset Offset from the center-line of the wheel to the king-pin. Tread Width Width of the tire tread. Chassis Overhang Distance from the center-line of the front axle to the front edge of the cab. This does not include the bumper depth. Additional Bumper Depth Depth that the bumper assembly adds to the front overhang. Wheelbase Distance between the center lines of the vehicle's front and rear axles. Inside Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle around which the vehicle can turn. Curb to Curb Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the vehicle's tires can turn. This measurement assumes a curb height of 9 inches. Wall to Wall Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the entire vehicle can turn. This measurement takes into account any front overhang due to the chassis,bumper extensions and/or aerial devices. As of 4/3/2007 12:38:19PM Page 2 of 2 Configuration Version: 169 COLORADO A ca 0 Parks and Wildlife Department of Natural Resoumes �d d '.,I :'�I h : tl;�I'4 ' '! ';A:Jj k�e .F 0 ell V�u I Cci' P 3411:' Cp!:%mjl OU110y 3I:'I� Hqpi� si�ljphu! sjjp;10!111��" �� OkIIIIMII�p Iij 9 10 T'15 &2CU! ll: Chlobor I A 20A Cathorke 1 ruttv T'ovm.� F II�a n l 1 rov!1[ rii s''Ir' W531 FIY .;',,Ir.I .M70 :..0 IP' CD 10+42 RE: MM Pht ApMkAhon fcw the ThNny Apartments at Tarui NO(, fhNnk y":7u qn „ j oin 11I bcm d (A' '�,J.d Ge in:d GIDLTdt,/" I'lovilin F) C ou�or id o I'hic A4 'ssm 0 wwdo ATS ancl VVfl'Icj[jj:�'," bs of dn�'z� u) a qudhy SwUm P&A yyk;T, and 5) pmvkie enjoysYs am! sustawnabli,,: " Il,td LJh'To0�;'Jul( O.c and IlmpV e caml axi KAY, genHodwaSo An MUmv iypntments impose devekVnw; of m 20q unt Nownt =K. 111 tv:m�) fl')jj'lCJV!S uilflts N:4'-Iq?nt lni'.fld fan'�IflW a�'Yd a uniU all 71��-' ulv,I[cased ax�st 9�61`h "II`QA it-tl A AAMY smy to Z�TkJ cO'hcil zlipl�ote h o'n W�)'SSM'ent ni':�st drs'r aL both the Mi; d'"BI";l IIP'c,NP."IYr.:'u :'°.dP'',"In"r, (,PW Lhat a ;iMmivey IwImfouned lin proje.:J ,'WU"ea ghadt l' than wr'u":m tcm knQJwJin? ec'��ch to idendfy patonLAt apromid synbud neMn rupw pvchmg and Nwaoni,u 1,11w,I 1 i Nm 11 1 Pull m l'Nilhdli,' P id:' 11'' !,'IldllllIlmi'„"�,Ii Ho 1 11 11 , i II ,6 l I'lh 1 1, w H;,1AA Ii I, ul I'llillil, 11, 1 II filll Who For firl'snodon on ways to mKINz(.'� Rnnpa:(:ts 1Cdu war)U'34'S YimJ m"St,flUory L)hds, I'Aea.sie ":co'01'aclr VlikJhfiMyna Rolvjmt WowNg WN vivild rywLhe H[,ehhoNJ of the UNITRkwal Lake cd nenhg mymbroy Ads dwaqh My Ede, piYopwed in a WK bear surruner, and act NRy is MY41 Udy Wal(Nhout the rinpased develoymn(mu. CNAUds behmer bens aqd future resbJentiand guesis W Yxur H pIlr wroa dons ale nct taken to rrduc�.','," To rnevent inninonnyRdWe ccrnffi'� � %v'Wh bleiu,s! bieap� and br�J'sh C a r R s ";V, ') N t;v-1 b(,' 11,c',Q i1 ir e',I f Ci lP' 3 U, C()11111 i1 1't E' i Nd a dt d ;A d e N t 4 1 a r c w, A cT v U A v W c MR d Um s�'i -(Wlllsaic'Uci' nr Gwage dews AM rerntn ckned w4ren ieydwAs amtliot On the juanNAW Kinky to gwevent bean, 'B 11 onsing all' d Ataklig stared foad rewaWs, 2iA as freeien ON, pe", KA, and n0t,, B�Ird nrx':4111chng hurrniniliq ::Irr'd fi.'ePJ:cn'sv Linnesof d. I� a C�i v�ty (Al, 1�r� I rlo:v'::�nlbeir 'I! 5)�' Bcar ;�'�J�2 aitsonatwes Aciudc plan&S nadve Axim, !s��d!s and rxl� tx:�airs FII,. d ..li'ii'n Nnd ruusts c4 the WAv iyarweoU', skc�ud,d UInfvinified dr,A such as Is 'u"wluy �ox'c"' %xyoties' S ,"Inks. and coher W&A nQ! fmqwya AnMeWprnem, UYC�A ) sCxch p U fosxl a'ncI <�xvveir' Colamdu WIN have adapted to IfAng lrN CPW Umt peole niaAng mW and reSing W Ms toII,event Linnecesary confilts betwoen pwopho japts, anrl v"Rdhfe. Dw",' txthe [wendal for NunnanovRIA con!&B ansdabed Wh fhK paox; am,,j others vi the areC pKase rzonTW Te Wovdng recornriwndmilms Men Wxyring Uwe and Annan fami soinves such as gzubage, pet foad. tarbeque q A cx%% WAgerators/freezers, open gampe doms am! WINeds, are a Fem Hems UYQ cmi varact� Liea8s' as �:�s lroy�'Aes' arid fendly, runs or kenneh. �rnprojreil f!enf,Ie"s ar�-J entao,��[c Inc, or gIrll �V51�� shoWd be rernoyed, DeWed 3pedNaWns for WAS-frKasty NacOg can he AM on our %,"Iebsite Aiii jjjpQ U�hdn� and Noise: Tmminimize disturbance ofbirds and other nocturnal wildlife, [PYYrecommends all lighting beOnotion-sensitive, down shielded, and of rnininnunn intensity to reduce constant nighttime illumination of movement corridors. Noise sh0Ukj be regulated during the evening and early morning hours to minimize disturbance to wildlife. Thank you again for the opportunity to work with the proposed Willow Apartments. We took forward to working together through cooperation, conversations, and education to prevent hunnan-vviidhfeconflicts and keeping our local wildlife safe. If you have any further questions, please contact District YYiidUhe Manager Serena Rocksund at (970) 531-2396 or email at sere na'[ocksund@state'co.us. Sincerely, Je[oO0yHUOtiDgtQn Area Wildlife Manager CC: G@rettVVatS0n, Northwest Deputy Regional Manager Serena ROoksund' District Wildlife Manager Catherivie Trotter From: Wilson, Benjarnin R 0V USARMY CIESPA (USA) <Benjamin.R.Wilsori@usace.ar-ri-iy.0-olil> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 913 AM To. Catherine Trot-ter Subject: RE:willows apts Attachments: 202'1.05.21-NWP-Verrfy wENCLS 200275601.pdf Hi Catherine, The Corps verified authorization of N 46 for Discharges in Ditches on May 21, 2021,which aHows for the relocatioin of Cozens Ditch as part of the proposed development, See attached. Please let rine know if you have questions. Respectfully, Benjarnin Wilson Project Manager, NW Colorado Branch Albuquerque District, U.S.Airmy Corps of Engineers 400 Rood Avenue, Room 224 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 PH: (970) 243-1199,#1012 FAX: (970) 241-2358 Y ***ln response to COVID-19, Regulatory Division staff are teleworking frorn horne or other approved location. We will do our best to adrninister the Re&atory Prograrn in an effective and efficient manner, Pdority wiH be given to health and safety activitres and essential infrastrUCtUre. Action on your perrnUt apphcation or other request may be delayed during this emergency. We appreciate your patience over the next several weel(s.*** Let us know now we're doing. Nease complete the survey at: fll all 11""'11 11,N 'VV; t, I;uI V 1,:::C' From: Catt'wrine'Trotter<ctrotter@town,fraser.co.us> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 202111:29 AM To: Hson, Berijarnin R ClV USA RMY CESPA (USA)<Benjarrniv'i.IR.Wllson@LJsace.arniy,n'ilN>; Kilhan-CDOT, BHarl <brian.kilHan@state.co.us>; Huntington - DNR,Jerorny<jev-omy.lV untli,ig,toin@state.c:o,us>; Alex Taft <ataft@co,grand.co.us>; Meara McQuain<rneav'a@ll"neadwa'terstralls.,org>;,Jean,Vo insoi <jeanj@rTIpeLC0rrI>; Jacoby, Kathleen E<Kat4ileeri.Jacoby@XCELENERGY.COM>; shoshana.cooper@usda,gov; terry,fern°uzza@c;alli-tc.corn; Dennis Soles<dsolles@eastgir-auldfire.co-r,u>; Frank Reeves<fr-ank.reeves@egsd.org>;AH Carlson <carlson@rnines.edLr>; 'Deb ILIr)dblom'<dl"ridblouii@co.gran,,nd.co.us>; anidy_newby@coriicast.com;Jarnes Shockey<jshockey@wpgov.corn> Cc: Russell Pennlngton<r-pen,,nington@towoi.fraser.co.tjs>; ,damn Cwildin <acwikll i@town.fu�aser.co.t,us>; Rod McGowan <rod @mcgowan-pc.corn>; Kent Whitrner<kent@whitryieirlawfir,ryi.coin>; can Lernieux<sean@whitrnerlawflrm.com> Subject: [lqon-DoD Source] RE: willows apts Good morning: Catherine Trotter From: Killian - CDOT, Brian <brian.killian@state.co.us> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 7:00 AM To: Catherine Trotter Cc: Kandis Aggen - CDOT Subject: Re:willows apts Catherine, CDOT has no comment. Thanks, Brian Utian Region 3 Access Prograrn Manager Traffic F1 Safety 19A P970-683-6284 I C970-210-1101 I F970-683-6290 222 S. 6th St, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501 III��a,11 1 111 On Fri, Oct 8, 202lat4:11 PM Catherine Trotter wrote: Review Agencies and Utilities- Terracina Design, on behalf of GP Willows Apartments LLC, has submitted a final pllat application to the Town of Fraser for The Willows Apartments located within the Grand Park Planned Development District, Please review the attachments via the link below. The comments will be made part of the public record of the Town of Fraser. The public hearing will Ibe November 10, 2021 I ;%A q«p I< Thank you. 1:1 P"II 111111 Catherine Trotter From: Jacoby, Kathleen E <Kathleen.Jacoby@XCELENERGY.COM> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 1:13 PM To: Catherine Trotter Subject: RE:willows apts final pla review Hi Catherine, I .see no outstanding issues with the final plat however Ras main will need to be extended to serve Building A, B, C, J. Clearances between all utilities will need to be'followed. (10' from water& sewer and .5"from electric communications). unica'tions). Thank you, Kathy From. Catherine Trotter<ctrotter@town.fraser,co.us> Sent: Friday, October B, 202.1.4:1.2 PM To: Wilson, Benjamin R Clef USARMY CESPK (USA) <Renjar"ruin.R. iUsori@u.ssace.army,u"riil>„ Killian -CDOT, Brian <brian.killian@state.co.us>r Huntington - IBNR,Jeromy<jerorny.huun'tingtori@state.c.o.us>e Alex Taft <ataft@co.grand.co.uAs>; Meara McQuain<rnear°a@headwaterstraiis.org>;.Dear'i Johnson<jeanj@mpei.com>,Jacoby, Kathleen E<Kathleen.Dacoby@XCELENERGY.COM>® sho.shana.cooper@uasdzu.gov; terry.'lerruzza@callutc.cornd Dennis Soles<dsoles@eastgrandf'ire.com>; Frank Reeves<flrank.reeves@egsd.org>,Jill Carlson<carlson@rnines.edu>a 'Deb Lindblom'<(iliridblom@co. rand.co.u,us>; andy._newby@comcast.corne James Shockley<jshockey@wp ov.corn> Cc: Russell Pennington<rl)enriingtori@town.fr•aser.co.us>e Adam Cwiklin <acwiklin@town,fraser.co.us>v Rod McGowan <rod@rncgowan-pc.corn>; Kent Whitrruer<kent@whitrnelrlawfirrru.corn>® Sean Lemieux<sean@whitrnerlawfirrn.corn> Subject: RE:willows apts oioo uuuu uuuuuuum��o� uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum p 88','ui..� IIII �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIYII „�,,, IIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIU IIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII III II � � y „ iii iiiiiu i i y, I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIII 1111111 � f� ml�� .,,�� m I� .µ �� w° Il�u'� � p °W IIII I ul�lllll II uuuuuuuuuiiiiuuuuml Iluuuul ul Iluuuulu�Iluulllnllll llulululull ��ul a lulmo�uuuuuhlluul IIIIIIIIIIIII�iilllli�ulluuu�VIII 111111 IV� un ol�uul uu uuuuuuuu uuulNllo ul�Vl�l Illuulu��l I ul ��, Review Agencies and Utilitie - Terracing Design, on behalf of GP"willows Aparts'nents LLQ, has su.ubrnitted a final plat application to the Town of (Fraser for The Willows Apartments located within the Grand lark Planned Development District, Please review the attachments vie the link below. The comments will be made part of the public record of the Town of Fraser. The public hearing will be November 10, 2021. U unwln Vp Thank you. :uillhlllmwlllfill' " II t..11„. .'illm II "w' k ,III '” Town Planner Town of (Fraser 153 Fraser Avenue, P.O. Box 379 Fraser, CO. 89442 Phone: 970-726-5491 x209 Fax: 979-726-551 V'v°WVq 'r 111' p',nII 1 I Xcel Energy," ffim" U1111111111111111111011, iilei ii PO Box 528,Granby CO 80446 March 19, 2021 'The Town of Fraser Catherine'Trotter/Town Planner 153 Fraser A.venue/PO Box 370 Fraser,CO 80442 RE: Site Plan Review Willows Apartments @,)Girand Park Subdivision,F-1, Fraser CO Dear Ms.Trotter, Public Service Company of ''olorado has no concerns to the new development.at Willows Apartments(fix,)Grand Park. Subdivision,F-I.Fraser CO. I have listed below the gereral guidelines that are required for gas construction. If you have any questions or concerns please call or email. Note:Developer needs to be aware of the highlighted portion below, Xcel Energy does not reserve capacity for future builds. Preliminary Plat Review General Guidelines Application ine 1 E Y Must apply for Gas service at Xcel Energy Builders Call L * Gas service will be installed at 24"depth and must be 10' away from water& sewer inain,electric 5'. Gas will be installed in a sole trench-no other utilities are to be located with main or services. * Gas main preferable to be installed in a 5' easement. No sleeves allowed for service crossings. * 1�cinlibrcelnent may be needed for existing system depending on the current capacity(additional cost of reinforrenient will be the responsibility Of the applicant:.) Meter Locations While customer Preference regarding meter location deserves reasonable consideration,it remains the right of the Company to determine the placement of meters.All meter locations including multiple points of service shall have the approval of the local Xcel Design Department, Meters and service regulators are to be set outside the serviced structure where they will be readily accessible and be protected from corrosion and other damage, including vehicular. Meter sets in areas of deep snow need to be placed on a gable end(no shed roof allowed)Note:Due to ercessive snow1411, ice and,snow shields will not beperinitted in thefillowing(,'olorado counties:Eagle,Lake, Park and Summit. Eke�tkers shall be installed on th or non-drip side of building or in an approved remote location from the building or structure in these counties. Sincerely, t h L ee V',J 2 r'O b Kathleen Jacoby Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature 583 East Jasper Court, Grariby CO 80446-0528 P:92f1...26.2'--4055 F: 970-887 2153 Catherine Trotter From: Jean Johnston <JeannJ rnpel.corn> Sent. Wednesday, October 3, 2021 :31 APS To: Catherine Trotter Subject. RE:willows apes L III II C".!'t.lU'w :. np up, 'u0''+d.nIIW �r`ii.,,gll"i11 dVl"z° �q".,11, �M Il,ln''II rvll u 4 IP;.p''q II' dµIliM„r Wu e I'rll „IV M ”: M0.ur.I"0' 1'11h,lbe5„01[ 11J,11an 1111... "II uNa :un IIII M",� q'.'m�M muh"ll^I 1M1u111`I,n„ w, µs. WW a rm;M fru.: u`a�" f,u.r mau n;.;rra as Ilmllilll 11,11 , ..n a'°w,.l'III' pW AN "w II 011%1111111 m.aNO '' „ hII �.. �I�� " p �'' .uI I. p I�.'l��M 11 rl Nb,” �.0"^�� , a',a;pu 1111 a.! 1�pu U III"nl"iMIII'IVniIY:',",iiu",W0!r,"gr,!PIM'u Jean Johnston Jeaua,)@rrape.,u.corn ,Senior,Staking E7rrgineerlRight of V/n-`ay ex 265 Specialist $"ft . nnrrtaln Parks Electric, inc n Vvest Agate -P.O. Box 170, Granby,CO67446m0170•971.887.3378 e are owrP�d by those we serine. 1113 This institution is an equal opportunity provider arra°employer. u 111c1 0l��Ii V k it llu:,tc!I II 1111'14' III �tl^�p�,l 11 II 11,11:q 1rW I'I ,I i I1 ',;IIP u From:Catherine Trotter Qrnailto:ctrotter,@town.fraser-.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021. 11:29 AIS To:Wilson, IBern]arrnlrn R CIV USARMY CESPK (LISA)<Bern]arnnuln.R.Wlsorl@usace.au,Irn,ny,uiill>m Killian-CDOT, Brian brlarn,k11l1arn nstate.co.uns>B Hu.rrrtlyd ton - CTR,J r my<jeromy.huI ntlrr ton@ state,co.Lis>;Alex"Daft <ataft@co.grand.co.us>; Meara McCkualrn<rnneara headwraterstralls.or >;.earn Johnston <Jearn@mpeLcornn>g Jacoby, Kathleen E<Kathleern,Jacoby XCELEINIkRGY.COM>e shioshana,cornpeu° rnsda.govp terr°y.ferruzza@calfitc.crarrn; Dennis Soles<dsoles@east rarndfllre.corrn>; Frank Reeves<frarnk.reeves@e sd. r >;All Carlson <:carlsunrn@rrnlrnes.edu>; 'Deb Llrndbloffn' .<dllrn blr, m co. lrarnd.crn.uns>„ andy_rn wtby crnrrncast.com;James Shockey<]shodkey w pgov,conr i Russell Pen rnirn torn <rperrrnlrn ton @town.fraser.co.us>; Adam Cwiklirn <acwtlkllrn@tow n.fraser.co.u.us>, Rind McGowan :rod r'rnc owan-pc.crnrn-o>w Kent Whitmer<kernt whltrrnerlawflrrnn,crnrnn>; Sean Lemieux<sean@whltrrnerla flrm.ccim> Subject: RE; willows apts I 'II uul �I IIII u. "�'IIS m 111111 IIII I I I In I I II dl IJI III I I Y I dluuu 111111 ^..r 11 loom �I�� Idl III I 61 ul I I I I II �1 1 Idl n u .,rll I uu III ou I I I III I IIIIh4 lul II 1111 L. 0 1 I l d I .. .�I',,IV II IIII II Illll,�hllllllllhllllllll o,w„III IIIIIIIIII, ,,,.",IIII��IIIIIIIIIII,III,,„ .II�L.II .,"' ,ull. dI�IIIIIJIII, '� , �� InI, .til III N,Illldl ..� Inu��l ory 4 0 I IW. I(III„. I I)I II1111� Illloll a Ih� )I W. Vl,�inP,a�l II I�dll„o�Iul II�I(I�uIINIIVII..II.. Good morning: We have scheduled a public hearing at Pl rnrnlrng Commission on October 27, 2021 on the project below. Please provide any comments to rune by October 20, 2021. Thanks. i Catherine Trot-ter From: Amy Crandall <acr'andall @rTflnes,edu> Sent: TUesday, Afly 13, 2021857 AM "ro: Catherine Trotter Subject: CGS Resubmittal Review- Willows Apaftrnents Attachments: GR-210007_3 Mlow Apartryientspdf Ffi Catheirine, Colorado Geolo&al Survey's resubn'flttal review of the Willows Apartments Prel4yflnary Plat and Final Man for Filing No. .1. and 2 is attached. We have no objectionto approval. Please call or rnail if you have quesflons or concerns. Thanks! An-'ny Crandafl, P.E. Engineering Geobg�st Land Use Review Program Colorado Geological Si urvey 1801. Moly Road, Gokfen, ("0 804.01 303-384-2632 �:11 a I ... .............. ("0, U-)RADO .`.EOI 0GICAL, SUR IN 1801 Moly Road Golden, Colorado 80401 Berry July 13, 2021 Karen State Geologist Catherine TroUer Locatioln: '[,own of Fraser SEI/ NE�44 Section 29, RO., Box 370 TIS, R.7 5W of the 6'a'PA Fraser, C(.,) 80442 A9309, 405.7956 Subject: Willows Apartments Preliminary Plot and Final Plan Filing No. I and 2 (Phases I and 2) Town of ll maser COUIAL (Aigue No. (3,R-21-0007 Dear Ms.Trotter: Colorado Geological Survey has reviewed the Willows Apartments prelfiniriary plat and final plan resubmittal. The applicant proposes 204 DIUlti-farnily residemial units in two phases(filings)that comprise 16.4 acres near Old Victory Road aiamd Arnerican Willow Drive in Fraser. Filing No. I (Phase 1)includes 132 MUlti farnily urtils with as cluibhOUse,arid Hling No. 2 (Phase 2) includes 72 multi-fainfly UnitSI 'The resubrnittal documents include a request for review(Ernail da wd June 23,2021), 90%Construction Plans (TKE Civil& Structliral Engineering,June 10, 2021)1- Final Plan—Amendment 2 (Core Consultants,Inc.,June 9,2021); Prelirniriary Plat,Fifirig No, I and Flifin g No. 2 (Core(,'onsultants,June 8,2021); Soils and Foundation Investigation, Willow Apartments, Phase 11-72 Units(CTLIThompson, Inc.,, May 24,2021)1- and.other dOCUmerits. C X,JS previously reviewed the soils and foundation investigation, Willow.Aparlinents Phase 1-132 Units(CTL Thorripsori, Inc., March 8, 2(121). The site does not contain,nor is iQ exposed to any geologic hazards that would preclude the proposed residential uses and density,and the site is outside the Leland Creek. 100-year flood hazard zone., ('111,states on page 4 of their reports for,Filing No. I and No., 2., "We did not observe geologic constrainfls on this site that would inhibit the planned construction." CGS agrees with C"I'L's assessment of the site arnd their recommendations .tor Hing Nos,, I and 2. Provided CTL's geotechnical recommendations are adhered to, C:' I, has no objection to approval o�f thepreliminary plat and final plan. lloweverq (.'ozens Ditch will be relocated to the nortli 1doetweeri B ui I ding A arid the Clubhouse as part of this development (Sheet 13 of the Final Plan), The existing Cozens Ditch traverses the fUtUre Building B tbotprint and could be as source for shallow water and saturated conditions. The existing ditch should 1be properly backfilled during construction with approptiate drainage trieasures(i.e,,drain system, etc.) implernented. 'rhank you f(-.)r the opportunity to review and comment on this 1orqject. If you have questions or require Further r(;.,view, please call me at 303-384-2632 or einail acrandall(1),mines.edu. Siricerely, Arny Crandall, P.E. Engineering Geologist GR-21-0007_3 Willow Apartments 8:51 AM,07/13/2021 �11 r THE WHITMER LAW FIRM, LLC ♦ www.u'hitrncrlawfirm.com Physical: 63331 U.S.lhiy,40,Granby C0 80446 Mailing: P.0.Bos 38,1lot Sulphur springs,CO 80451 Phone 970.725.3460 Kent 1I.Wluuncr(Kent@) hitin rlaw firm.com)f William G.Berry(Will(ci w(iitmerlawFirm.com)j Sean C.Lemieux(Sean twhitmerla\ctirm.com)0 Kaithn Randall(f<arie�t>\vhitineriawFssm.com)0 October 1,2021 Scott D,Albertson Holley,Albertson& folk, P.C, Via Email to: sda rr haplaw.net 1667 Cole Boulevard, Suite; 100 Lakewood, Colorado 80401 ISE: Grand bark Willows Apartments Dear Scott: I am writing,oil behalf ofthe Town of F'raser in response to your Septennber 28, 2021 entail concerrning,tete proposed Willows ,^r p7rl.rtrnents project at Grand lark, To begin, we disagree with your characterization of the course of events and the'Town's obligations under the Court"s preliminary injunction order. First, even if Fraser had not exercised its contractual remedies ander the Annexation Agreement, the Willows project could not have proceeded to the July 28"' planning Commission meetings; because Grand Dark failed to send correct notice to tyre surroundings property owners. Second,the Court's preliminary injunction requires the Town to follow, its normal process with regard to Grand l'ark's building and development matters. It does not require that your client be accorded any special process. The Willows Application could not have been heard at (lie Septeinber planning Commission meethig. F'o1 that to happen, notice was required to be published on September 9'°' for the September 22r"' meeting. The deadline for publication submission passed at 12:00 noon on September Y", before the Court;entered its prelinfinriry injunction order. Following entry ofthe order, Catherine Trotter reached out to Mr, Lipscomb on September carr to discuss rescheduling,;the Willows project for a Planning C:onnrnission meeting. She received no response until Grand Park's planner contacted her on September 14"to discuss the upcoming.;October 27i' meeting. This is the;earliest Meeting at which the Planning~; C'olnunissiorn can consider the project bee<ILrse of Elie publication requirernents set forth irl the Municipal Code. Despite having no oNigatiorn to conntorrrr its processes to Grand Park's financing,schedule,the Towyn will process the Willows Apartments application as follows: 10/g/21 Notice ofthe Planning Commission hearing~will be sent to be published on October 14, 2021 $1,¢unscd m Caloadn,\C'voimnp,,uid\Iunrnn,r f L,rwnsed m(;nlrtado,K y.rmu7};,.unl 41.ri,.rme 0 l.icrnsed m(;rrior.dn 10/22/21 In anti6pation of a potential Planning Commission meeting on November 10, 2021, notice of hearing on the 11nal plat will sent to be pUblished on October 28, 2021 10/27/21 T'he prelirninary, plat and FPDP will be scheduled for the Planning Commission hearing 11/3/21 The prelirninary plat air(] FPDP will be scheduled lotthe Board of"Trustees nieeting 11/10/1-11 ff the Board approves the prefirninary plat and FPDP on Novernber Y",the final plat will be scheduled for Planning C.I on-irnission hearing on Novernber 10111 if a qU01-Urn is available. The Planning Commission rnectiq-1,regLdarly scheduled for November 24'h will riot be held because of the Thanksgiving holiday. If a quorum cannot be present on November 10"', the final plat Nvill riot be heard until the Decernber meeting. 12/1/21 T'he fina] plat will be scheduled for the Board of" rUstees i-necting ifthe Planning ComMiSSiOn conducts its hearing on November 10"', Ifthe Planning Commission does not hear the matter until the December rneeting, then the final plat will be scheduled for the Board OfTrUSteeS meeting in January 2022. In order to acconirnodate the above schedule, Grand Park nuNt provide all required notices, il-ICIUding correct notice to adjacent property owners within 200 feet of the legal descriptions on both the IFTET and preliminary plat. That 1101iCC must be provide(] by certified mail, return rec6pt requested and mailed no later than October 13, 2021. Further, staff will recOMMend denial of"the application by the Planning Commission and Board of'frusleeS LITIless the following matters are corrected and the plans resubmitted no later than October 14, 2021. As VOU are aware, all of the following deficiencies previously were rioted to you and your client last spring and summer,yet rernairi Unaddressed: I, The portions of Planning Area 23W included in the development area ofthe preliminary plat arid Z� FPDP MUst be removed to preserve the C.'ozens Meadow open space in accordance with the Annexation Agreernent and PDD Plan. 2, The areas shown as 2W.3 and 2WA on the FPDP 1T)Ust be removed because they are riot part of the current development plan and they will riot be approved as future development sites until WWI developinent plans, consistent with the IIDD, are submitted. 3. Grand Park niust agree to provide a dedicated right-of-way for and construct Old Victory Road frorn the existing ter-minus at Mountain Willow Drive to Kings Crossing,Road as part of the subdivision improverrients lor this pro ect- The timing IN,cornpleting certain segments shOUld be addressed in the SIA. 4Grand Park must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Willows project, as well as future developaient. The proposed Willows proJect will exceed the capacity ofthe current system. COIISU116011 ofthese sewer improvements inust be included in the SIA, or in a separate improvernents a-reernent, and Must be completed before any Certificates 0f0CCU[)anCY will be issued lor the Willows Apartments, Page 2 of 3 In addition to the foregoing, the review and Imiring process may identify other iSSUCS which need to be resolved and may result in conditions being altached to any apf:)roval. Finally,concerning Grand Park's objections to the con-anents issued by Public Works,at the: appropriate time the Fraser Board of Trustees will determine whether an extension of American Willow Drive will be permitted. That decision will be made in accordance with the Annexation Agreement, the PDD Plart and the appiicable regUlations. As indicated above, Old Victory Road must be completed and dedicated as pad.of'the Willows project, although the tirning for paving different sections carl be addressed it)the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Sincerely, Kent H. Whitmer Town Attorney Page 3 of 3 HOLLEY,ALBERTSON&POLK,P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW DzNm WEST Omcs PARK Surm 100,Summa 19 1667 CoLE Bmix GOLDEN,COLORADO 80401 PnoNz(303)233.7838 FAX(303)233-2960 SCOTT D.ALBERTSON GEORGE ALAN HOLLEY DENNIS B.POLK (1925-2002) ERIC E.TORGERSEN MELISSA R.LIFF RYAN S.STEVENS October 15, 2021 EMAIL ONLY Kent H. Whitmer, Esq. RO. Box 38 Hot Sulphur Springs, Colorado 80451 k—en 1(r"—Ihht n)erl 11 Wfil r MI.00111 Re: Grand..Park-_Willows Apartments Dear Kent� '"Mis will respond to the four munbered paragraphs on Page 2 of your October 1, 2021 correspondence: concern,ing Willows Apartments, I will repeat the statements in your letter Verbatini, followed by a resporise on behalf of Grand Park Developine.m .1,11,C, the applicant and property owner, 1. The portions of Planning Area 231AI included in the development area of ffie prelinlinary plat and FPDP must be removed to preserve the Cozens Meadow open space in accordance with the Annexation Agreement and PDD Plan. RESPONSE: There is riothing Nvithiri the Annexation Agreement or the applicable 2005 PDD Plan that P recludcs the inclusion of portions of Plarming Area"2-3) within the FPDPs or plats for other planning areas. Ifyou disagree with that staternent, please point.out the specific provisions of the Annexation Aareement or the 2005 PDD that you are relying on in articulatincy this Position. Section 4.3 of the Armexation Agreenient specifically states, "Tile 2003 PDD has..........—not ........ been conlIgured based uP On surveyed acreages for the various Planning Areas., In ffie event the boundaries of a Plaiming Area are adyusted at the time of subdivision OT- FPDP, then the approved number of residential units or the approved cornmercial square footage provided for in the 2003 FIDD shall be the controiflng factor and the designated acreage or density will be ad.justed frorn. that constant," Note 15 in the 2003 PDD states, "'The cbaracter descriptions [of Kent H. Whitnier, Esq. October 15, 2021 Pa-0e 2 the Planning Areas] are a guide only and may chatige based oil market conditions and other difficult to predict" factors that may affect the land use rnix, intensity, and character of plan.ning 0 areas over the protected twenty'-five year development period." Sirnilarly, Not 16 in the 2005 PDD states, "The character descriptions [of the Planning Areas] are a guide and may change based on market conditions and otlier factors that may affect the land use mix, intensity, and design of the Planning Areas over the projected twenty-five year development period." There are not any provisions in the Annexation Agreement that contemplate that open space Plarming Area 23W would be a single, large, contiguous parcel during the development of Grand Park and rein ain Under single ownership, 'rhere is nothinIg in the Annexation Agreement or PDD that prohibits the inclusion of portions of 23W in SUbdivision plats as development proceeds, as long as PA 23W' remains open space. V Prior FPDPs and plats for Planning Areas within Grand park have included Tracts that are part of PA 23W. Specifically,,, Tract HI in Elk Creek Filing 3 (Note 6), Tracts, H2 and 143 in Elk Creek Filing 4 (Note 6) and 'Fract C in the Meadows (Note 16) are within PA 23W,just as the Tracts inclUded within proposed Willows FilinIgs I and 2 will rernain part of PA 233 and be finflted to use as open space. In addition, for the nlost part, the Siftl,-IfiWl with (lie PA 233 open s Tracts in the Willows is identical to that resulting in the creation of 23W Tracts in Elk pace C> Creek and Meadows. Each of the 'Tracts is de-fined, by the roadways adjacent to or within the Willows, i.e,, Old Victory Road to -the southwest, American Willow Drive at tile entry ton the Willows Apartryients Filing I from Old Victory Road and MOLIT.Itain Willow Drive as the main access road bisecting PA 2W. In addition to the above quoted provisions frolli the Annexation Agreement and PDDs, Section 194-165 of' the Municipai Code articulates the following criteria for open space: `*Avoidance of concentrating open space into large areas with the SUbsequent "packing" of residential areas" and "Open Space and/or landsc,,.,q)e accorripanies all types of developpie nts," In other words, the municipal code recognizes that it is be:r.ieficial to disburse open space rather Hearn pack it into as single contiguous area. In short, the inclusion of the PA 23W Tracts within the Willows Apartnients is not a "deficieney"' as suggested in your letter. Rather, it is consistent with. the concepts articulated in the Annexation Agreenient,the PI)D,, arid.the Town, Code. 'I The areas shown as 2W.3 and 2WA on the FPDP must be ren'loved becaUSe they are not part of the current developnient plan and they will not be approved as future developroera sites until actual develol,,nnent plans, consistent with the PDD, are submitted. RESPONSE: Grand Park Developrnei.,it recognizes that 2W.3 and 2WA will require the SUbMission and approval of future additional FPDPs and plats for those areas, however, in the past, Fraser hasrequired that the entirety of a Planning Area should be reflected on and included within the FPDP -for, any portion of a Planning Area, As such, 2W,33 and 2WA are included to conform Nvith historic practice. Kerit FL Whitn-ier, Esq. October 15, 2021 Page 3, I Grand Park niust agree to provide a dedicated right-of--way for and construct Old Victory Road from the existing terminus at Mountain Willow Drive to :111g Crossing Road as part of the subdivision. ir.-nproverneruts for this prqject. Phe tin-ring for completing certain segineiits should be addressed in the SIA. RESP'(',)NSE: Old Victory Road has already been constructed and completed froln American Willow Drive to Kings Crossing Road pursuant to plans previously sub.n1itted to and approved by, Fraser. Pursuaritto the Second Arriendnient to Annexation Agrceinent entercd into between Cornerstone, Winter Park, and Fraser, Old Victory Road .frorri Grand Park Drive south to Kirigs Crossing R.oad, will be conveyed in the forni of an casement to Fraser in order to avoid the right- of-way dedication beirig considered a subdivisiori of property. Dedication of that segnient of Old 'Victor), Road will occur in conjunction. with the develop nient ofthe Planning Areas contiguous to tl:mt segment of Old Victory Road. (3rand Park Developynent will dedicate tile portion of Old Victory Road adjacent to Planning Area 2W to Fraser upon completion of the Willows Apartryients, A separate SIA inay appropriately include a requirement Ibr theaving and ,P C, conipletion of the segnient of Old Victory Road between Mountain Willow Drive and American Willow Drive in connection with the conipletion of Phase 11 of the Willows Apartnients proJect. As previously discussed with Fraser staff last spring, the portion of Old Victory lZoad between Mountain Willow Drive and American Willow Drive will be used as a staging and storage area Ibr constrUction of the Willows Apartments p.a.)ject and doing so at that location will, minimize any impact to the existing honies within the Willows. In the event the 'Willows Aparunents are not constructed, that section of'Old Victory Road will remain gravel until Planning Area 2W' is built so that construction impacts to adjacent horneowners is ininirnized by utilizing that portion of 01dVictory Road for staging. 4Cirand Park niust agree to C011MUCt the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary, to serve the Willows proJect, as well as future developnient. The proposed Willows proJect will exceed, the capacity of the current systern., Construction of these sewer irnprovernents arrest be included in the SIA, 01' in a separate improvenients agreenient, and niust be completed before any Certificates of' Occupancy will be issued for the 'Willows Apartments, RESPONSE: Grand Park Development agrees that construction of these sewer ifflp.I'OVernents will be the stibject of a separate improvements agreenient and not part of the SIA. Finally, while there is no intent or desire to extend American. Willow Drive to Highway 40 as part of`the Willows ApartmentsproJect, that roadway extension and connection will occur in the future ai-A, with aH due respect, the Board of Tnistees does not have the prerogative to deny that roadway ex[ension, It is reflected on the approved Roadway Plan in both the 200") and 200.5 PDDs, aswell as the tra.f.fic studies required and approved by Fraser. Thank, fov vottr arp I Sincerely yours, S' o t t 1'.), Mbertson SDA/dp AFELSBLJRG itH 0 UF & U L L EV I G March 8, 2021 Do Mr. Clark Lipscomb 3' 0 Grand Park Development, LLC PO Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 Reference: Grand Park Planning Area 2W—Trip Generation Review FHU Reference No, 1 07 1 04-05 Dear Mr. Lipscomb: It is our current understanding that you are in the process of starting the next phase of development of Planning Area 2W of the Grand Park development in Fraser, Colorado, The current Planning Area 2W development plan includes 204 multifamily residential dwelling units in addition to the SS units currently built within Planning Area 2W. Per your request, this letter addresses whether the current development plan is consistent with previous traffic studies prepared for the area. The proposed development of Planning Area 2W has previously been evaluated in the 2004 RENDEzVOUS Traffic Impact Analysis (Master TIA). The Master TIA evaluated potential impacts of 686 detached residential dwelling units, 1857 attached residential dwelling units, 1278 lodging units and 395.8 thousand square feet of commercial development on the surrounding roadway network and identified recommended roadway and intersection improvements. Planning Area 2W included a total of 250 attached dwelling units, 278 lodging units and 100,000 square feet of commercial retail use. Based on the trip generation rates used in the TIA, the proposed 250 attached and 9 detached dwelling units would generate fewer vehicle-trips than the original proposed residential and retail uses. Table I provides a trip generation comparison between the Master TIA and the current plan, based on the number and type of proposed residential units. Trip generation rates are consistent with rates used in the Master TW Table 1, Planning Area 2W Trip Generation Comparison 21+4' Land Use Quantity wily AM Peak Hour' PM Peak Hour' Scenario TrigsIn Out Total In Out Total Commercial 100 KSF 3,000 j 42 24 662 143 143 286 Master Attached 250 Units 1,250 23 60 83z 73 38 111 TIA Residences Lodging 278 Units 1,112 21 64 86 78 42 120 Total 5,362 86 148 235 294 223 517 Attached Residences 250 Units 1,250 23 60 83 70 38 1,08 Current Detached Plan Residences 9 Units 72 2 5 7 4 2 6 Total 1,322 25 65 90 74 40 114 Rates used to calculate trip generation estimates are consistent with rates utilized and documented in the 2004 RENDEzVOUS Traffic Impact Analysis,See attachment for information. D I-E R S G R E E NI (--I R C L U, S LJ CTE 1 !3 0 G R E E N W 0 0 D 'V 1 L L.A G E, C(Z.) 5i e I 0 9 Ir, F I D 3 03 . 7 2 I 1 14 0 W 0/ F --J LJ E N:G,C 0 M March 8, 2021 Mr. Clark Lipscomb Page 2 As shown on Table I, Planning Area 2W would generate approximately 4,040 (approximately 75 percent) fewer daily vehicle trips, 144 fewer vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 403 fewer vehicle trips in the PM peak hour. Because Planning Area 2W is projected to generate fewer trips under the current development plan in comparison to the Master TIA, it is reasonable to assume that the site roadway network and accesses to US Highway 40 included in the Master TIA are sufficient to accommodate the proposed development of Planning Area 2W without creating operational deficiencies. It has been concluded that the current development plans for Planning Area 2W are generally consistent with previous traffic studies and no new analyses are necessary at this time to address the changes in the land use with the Town of Fraser. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG yk. -a Ly1 E. DeVries. PE, PTOE Principal Attachment: Trip Generation Rates and results from 2004 RENDEzVOUS Traffic Impact Analysis, pp. 10-1 1 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis B. Trip Generation Table 3 summarizes the trip generation rates used in this analysis. Daily trips to be generated by single and multi-family residences within Rendezvous were estimated based on standard trip generation rates published by Grand County. Information included in the Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis was used as the basis for the Lodging trip generation rates. The rate of 30 vehicle-trips per day per 1,000 square feet of commercial space was based on information from Pitkin County research. Documentation of these trip generation rates is included in Appendix A. The AM and PM peak hour rates for the single and multi-family residential properties were calculated based on peak hour percentages determined at Snowmass Village, a mountain area with many similarities to the Fraser Valley. The peak hour rates for other uses were extracted from earlier Maryvale analyses. Table 3. Trip Generation Rates Residential Rates Tris per Dwelling Unit Commercial Rates Single-Family Multi-Family Lodging (Trips per 1,000 SF) Residences Residences Daily 81 51 42 30 AM Peak Hour 0.68 8.5% 0.33 (6.6%) 0.31 (7.75%)20.66 PM Peak Hour 0.70 8.75% 0.43 8.6% 0.43 10.75% 2.85 From Grand County Trip Generation Rates 2 From Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis, by Leigh, Scott& Cleary 3 Peak Hour Percentages determined in Snowmass Village Roadway System study 4 From Pitkin County Retail Shop Trip Generation Rate-"No Transit System" scenario The estimated number of trips to be generated by the Rendezvous development was calculated based on the rates shown in Table 3; the results are depicted in Table 4. rr_e. BU RG, ` ULLEv1(' Page 10 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Table 4. Trip Generation Estimates Total Trips Generated Section Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total East Mountain 914 Units Residential (342 SFDU, 4,970 110 310 420 320 170 490 442 MFDU, 130 Lodge) Commercial 64.2 KSF 1 1,790 20 10 30 65 65 130 Sub-Total 6,760 130 320 450 ..385 235 620 West Mountain 3,821 Units (686 Residential SFDU, 17,785 375 1070 1,445 1,175 625 1,800 1857 MFDU, 1278 Lodge) Commercial 395.8 KSF 9,740 115 65 180 380 380 760 Sub-Total 27,525 490 1,135 1,625 1,555 1,005 2,560 TOTALS 34,285 620 1,455 2,075 1,895 1,215 3,110 As shown in the table, the East Mountain portion of Rendezvous is expected to generate approximately 6,760 daily trips while the West Mountain would generate approximately 27,525 trips. A total of approximately 34,285 daily trips are expected to be generated by the development. Of these trips, approximately 2,100 are expected to occur during the AM peak hour, and about 3.1OOare expected inoccur during the PMpeak hour. Based nnthe mix mf land uses proposed for the development and the typical composition of trip types for uses of this sort, it was estimated that 33 percent of trips generated by the proposed commercial land uses would baattributable to residential uses internal to the site. |tshould benoted that these estimates dunot reflect the factor uf''puaaby^ trips. Paaobytrips are vehicle-trips already traveling along the roadway network adjacent to a development (UsU8||y8 C0mm8rCi8| development) that divert into the development to COmp|81B an errand, etc. Though poSSbytrips contribute t0traffic volumes entering and exiting asite, they donot add traffic tOthe adjacent roadway network. |Dthe case OfRendezvous, iDfOrD@UOD included in the |TE'e Trip Generation suggests that paeabytrips could comprise approximately 30percent of the commercial site generated traffic volumes. Thus, the total trip generation for the Rendezvous development could be reduced by about 10 percent to account for the passby effect. Hovvavmr, in order to maintain a conservative approach to this analysis, no reduction was made toaccount for passbytrips. *USnUms RENDEWOUS FRASER, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Koelbel and Company 78622 Winter Park Drive P.O. Box 149 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC P.O. Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 Prepared by. Felsburg Holt and Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, Colorado 80111 303/721-1440 Principal-in-Charge: Robert W. Felsburg, P.E., C.C.E. Project Engineer: Lyle E. DeVries, P.E. FHU Reference No. 04-086 December 2004 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OFCONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | i INTRODUCTION 1 A. Project Background 1 U� B. Study Objectives------------------ ----- 1 -- C. Previous Studies-------------------------—--------------------------------------------------------4 || EXISTING (�(�ND|T|(J/�� ------------------------------------------- 5 . A. Existing Roadway Network --------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 B. Existing Travel Patterns --------------------------------------- 5 C ��xisiiOgTn@f�cyolVnles----------------------'----------------- 5 C. |||. SITE TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 A. Site Roadways/Access------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 B. Trip Generation -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------1O C. Trip Distribution /Assignment-----------------------------------------------------------------12 � |V. LONG TERM FUTURE ANALYSIS--------------------------------------------------------------------14 A. Background Traffic Volumes -----------------------------------14 B. Total Traffic Volumes----------------------------------------------------------------------------14 C. Future Roadway Laneage----------------------------------------------------------------------17 -- D. US4UTraffic Control----------------------------------------------------------------------------18 E. Auxiliary Lane Requirements------------------------------------------------------------------18 F Long Range Future Tnaf�o [�penations-----------------------------2O F. V. UG HIGHWAY 40 IMPROVEMENTS-----------------------------------------------------------------23 \/|. SUK8MARY/ SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS-----------------------25 N� APPENDIX A TRIP GENERATION RATE DOCUMENTATION APPENDIX B LOS WORKSHEETS - LONG RANGE FUTURE TRAFFIC APPENDIX C US HIGHWAY 40 PROGRESSION [}|AGRAK48 � FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure1. Vicinity Map------------—--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Figure 2. Proposed Site Plan ---—-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Figure 3. Existing Traffic Volumes, Lane Geometry, and Levels of Service-----------------— 7 Figure 4. Rendezvous Access Plan on US 40---------------------------------------------------------- 9 Figure 5. Site Generated Buildout Traffic Volumes----—---------------------------—----------------13 Figure 6. Year 2025 Background Traffic Volumes---------------—------—--------—-----------------15 Figure 7. Year 2025 Total Traffic Volumes----—--------—---------------------------------------------16 Figure 8. Year 2025 Recommended Lane Geometry, Traffic Control, and Levelsof Service-----------------—------—--------—----------------—--------------------------21 Figure 9. US 40 Traffic Growth----------------------------—--------—--------—--------------------------24 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. US 40 Traffic Volume Comparison------------------------------------------------------------ 6 Table 2. Proposed US 40 Site Access------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Table 3. Trip Generation Rates--------------------—-----------------------------------------------------10 Table 4. Trip Generation Estimates---------------------------------------------------------------------11 Table 5. Distribution of Internal Commercial Vehicle-Trips----------------------------------------12 Table 6. Auxiliary Lane Requirements - US 40 Intersections-------------------------------------19 Table 7. US 40 Progression Results--------------------------------------------------------------------22 Table 8. Proposed US 40 Site Access------------------------------------------------------------------26 INFELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rendezvous is an 1800-acre multi-use development proposed for the Upper Fraser Valley of Colorado. Annexed into the Town of Fraser, it is intended to become a year-round destination resort community which will include a variety of types of residential units, recreational facilities, and commercial uses. The project site is located along U.S. Highway 40 (US 40) on the south side of the Town of Fraser, north of the Town of Winter Park. The traffic impact analysis of the proposed Rendezvous development in Fraser, Colorado has been developed based on a land use plan that includes residential, commercial, and recreational properties. Development proposed for the west side of US 40 (i.e. "West Mountain") is estimated to generate approximately 27,525 daily vehicle-trips, and the East Mountain is estimated to generate approximately 6,760 vpd at full buildout. It is estimated that the East and West Mountains combined will generate approximately 34,285 vehicle-trips per day. Of these trips, approximately 2,100 are anticipated to occur during a typical weekday AM peak hour, and approximately 3,1100 vehicle-trips are expected to occur during a typical PM peak hour. Background (unrelated to Rendezvous) traffic projections were developed for the Year 2025 based on US 40 growth rates developed and documented by the Colorado Department of Transportation. The estimated daily and peak hour traffic volumes to be generated by the Rendezvous development were added to the background traffic, and operational analyses were performed to identify lane geometry and traffic control enhancements necessary to accommodate the total future traffic volumes. The following roadway improvements are recommended. US Highway 40 Based on growth in traffic volumes along US 40, it is estimated that the roadway should be widened from 2 to 4 lanes between the Towns of Winter Park and Fraser between the Years 2015 and 2020. The 4-lane section is expected to be adequate to accommodate the estimated growth in traffic volumes that will occur with the completion of Rendezvous. Because of the many elements comprising traffic on US 40 and causing the need for widening of the highway, it will be important for discussions to be held in the near future between the affected parties to determine responsibility for this improvement. Rendezvous Road Rendezvous Road is proposed to function as the primary east-west connection to both the East Mountain and West Mountain sections of the Rendezvous development. To accommodate site traffic, it is recommended that Rendezvous Road be constructed as a two-lane roadway east and west of US 40. Fraser Valley Parkway Fraser Valley Parkway is proposed to be constructed parallel to US Highway 40 within the West Mountain area of Rendezvous, providing for site circulation as well as regional relief to US 40. Based on projected Year 2025 total traffic volumes, it is recommended that Fraser Valley Parkway be constructed as a 2-lane roadway throughout the site. PFELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page i Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis US Highway 40/King's Crossing Road Intersection Signalization is expected to be warranted with background traffic volume growth and the addition of traffic volumes related to the Rendezvous development. It is recommended that the US 40 / King's Crossing Road intersection be signalized when warranted. In addition, it is recommended that the eastbound approach to the intersection be widened and striped to accommodate exclusive left-turn, through, and right-turn lanes. US Highway 40/County Road 721804 Intersection It is recommended that the ultimate cross-section of US 40 at this intersection include left-turn and right-turn deceleration lanes to accommodate traffic entering CR 72 from US 40. US 40 Site Access Plan To provide sufficient access to the site, the US 40 access plan developed for the Fraser— Winter Park Roadway Planning study was adapted to the proposed development. The proposed plan for site accesses to US 40 is depicted on Figure S-1 and is summarized in Table S-1. As shown in Table S-1, a total of 6 US 40 accesses are proposed along an approximate 1.8 mile length of US 40 to accommodate the Rendezvous development. Access types include Right-In / Right-out and full-movement accesses. The full-movement accesses at Community First Bank (1), Rendezvous Road (4) and Planning Area 1W (6) are anticipated to be signalized when warrants are met. Table S-1. Proposed US 40 Site Access Access Location Access Type Comments Point Access to West Mountain and I West side of US 40 Full-movement, signalized' Community First Bank, will be aligned opposite Safeway access on east side of US 40 2 West side of US 40 Right-in/Right-out Access to Planning Area 3Wc 3 East side of US 40 Full-movement, unsignalized Access to Planning Area 14E 4 Both sides of US 40 Full-movement, signalized' US 40/ Rendezvous Road Intersection 5 East side of US 40 Right-In/Right-Out, Access to Planning Area 12E I unsignalized 6 1 West side of US 40 1 Full-movement, signalized I Access to Planning Area 1W 'These accesses would be signalized when warrants are met FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page ii ' r 0 U) cm c 0 2C�4 Sm co co A) 0-,qk. LO ® (D C) 7 c o 90 fu ZIP V, roy d V9 ro o. O Xg? E Amor z CD N 4) F (D X !� U) ' ppb II II C-1 z OD w 9 LU al rdue? x N z c Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Project Background Rendezvous is an 1800-acre multi-use development proposed for the Upper Fraser Valley of Colorado. Annexed into the Town of Fraser, it is intended to become a year-round destination resort community which will include a variety of types of residential units, recreational facilities, and commercial uses. As shown on Figure 1, the project site is located along U.S. Highway 40 (US 40) on the south side of the Town of Fraser, north of the Town of Winter Park. The development is intended to reinforce the economic base of the area by providing services for tourists and other transient users. The skiing, tourism and vacation home industries are the primary economic activity in the region, and the uses planned for the Rendezvous development will support this economic base. These industries have grown with the population in the Denver Metropolitan area, and this growth has translated into an increased demand for residences such as those proposed.to be provided at Rendezvous. The proposed development plan is depicted on Figure 2. U.S. Highway 40 divides Rendezvous into two sections, East Mountain and West Mountain. Both sections will include a mix of single and multi-family residential development and commercial properties. An 18-hole golf course will be constructed within the West Mountain area. B. Study Objectives This analysis is intended to provide an assessment of the impact of the Rendezvous development on the operation of the Upper Fraser Valley transportation network. The analysis includes the following items: 0 A description of existing conditions in the area, including the roadway network, traffic volumes, and traffic operations. * An assessment of site travel characteristics, including the proposed internal roadway network and an estimate of the number of vehicle-trips to be generated by the development. 0 Year 2025 background traffic volume projections and an assessment of traffic operations at project build-out. 0 Recommendations for network enhancements based on the evaluation. Recommended improvements resulting from this analysis may include roadway widening to accommodate auxiliary and /or through travel lanes and intersection traffic control improvements such as signalization. This information will serve as a basis for future discussions to be held between the affected parties to determine responsibilities for these improvements. P—A FELSBURG CO OHOLT & ULLEVIG Page 1 cz r T �w t> z o 0 0 0) =C CL CO C) 1 E 0 w Z 1 0 1 D D 0 > N W 13 Z uj =w CL cc t m t o 10 C? 0 r d 1u 0 R 00 r U� C) (DC 'WI co 9 R Z, cr N ca) _ 0 :3 CL z t?) LL LL E CO � 6 c 07 LL i y CE 0 /r C Q II II II " cc Ga to Rd' w w uOrls ♦ fir.",./.;,, W JZ QZ r♦ `r � 1 Lu 0 N r , �, 3 �� 'zee •�"'� r J � V, r r �` � ! \ � \•` LUZ- M / 'J140A �'.� "♦'`,3�" .gib °,-° •� �\ CR 804 `--.. —�,�, ��,' � 'vx' ♦♦�' �r° ''' i 1:...x. \ '� ! "`'�"�%� rR 72 co r co 0 0 0 r .. r a wZa a r s Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis C. Previous Studies The traffic impacts of Rendezvous, previously known as the Maryvale property, have been assessed in two previous studies. The first assessment was completed in 1986 by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig as a part of the Fraser-Winter Park Roadway Network Planning Study. A subsequent assessment occurred with the completion of the Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis by Leigh Scott & Cleary in March of 1998. The Grand County Engineering Department completed the Fraser Valley Master Road Plan in May 1999. Changes to the Rendezvous Master Plan since the preparation of these reports necessitate the current reassessment of Rendezvous traffic impacts. However, information included in these reports was used as a basis for the current analysis. In addition to these studies, on behalf of the Town of Winter Park, Felsburg Holt& Ullevig has conducted several signal warrant analyses along US 40 in the vicinity of the project. Traffic volume data collected in accordance with these efforts were used for the evaluation of existing conditions along US 40. The data are summarized in four separate letter reports addressed to Winter Park Town Engineer Charles Swanson regarding the analyses. The letters are dated March 4, 1999, February 18, 2000, February 20, 2001 and February 15, 2002. Rd FELSBURG (41-IOLT & ULIEVIG Page 4 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Existing Roadway Network The roadway facilities in the vicinity of the project are described as follows: • U.S. Highway 40—Although it runs north and south within the Valley, US 40 serves as the primary east-west connection from the Upper Fraser Valley to the rest of the state. Highway 40 provides access to Interstate 70 via Berthoud Pass. The highway exerts a strong linear effect within the Upper Fraser Valley since all roads lead onto the highway and because travel from one part of the region to another is not possible without some use of US 40. Currently, US 40 is classified by CDOT as a Non-Rural Arterial (NR-B) facility in the vicinity of the site. The posted speed along US 40 at the south and north ends of the Rendezvous development site is 35 miles per hour(MPH) and reaches a maximum of 55 MPH at the center of the site. • King's Crossing Road - King's Crossing Road is a two-lane east-west access roadway serving existing development south of the project site. • County Road 72 (CR 72) - CR 72 serves as a connection from US 40 west of the Town of Fraser and into the Vasquez Mountains. It is currently a gravel road with the exception of a two-lane paved length of approximately 500 feet west from US 40. The intersection of CR 72 with US 40 is currently signalized. r • County Road 804 (CR 804) -CR 804 is a two-lane road aligned opposite CR 72 at its signalized intersection with US 40. It serves several developments located east of US 40. B. Existing Travel Patterns As noted earlier, US 40 is the primary connection between the Valley and the rest of Colorado. It serves as a north-south spine in the Valley, and the majority of east-west roadways (e.g. CR 72 and CR 108)serve as local access roads. Currently, the majority of vehicle-trips along US 40 occur to and from the south, between the Towns of Fraser and Winter Park and the Denver metropolitan area. C. Existing Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site are depicted on Figure 3. Traffic volume data were collected by CounterMeasures, Inc. on a weekday during February of the Year 2000. Analysis of continuous traffic counts gathered in the Year 2000 along US 40 at Berthoud Pass (south of the Town of Winter Park) indicated that, on average, daily traffic volumes on a Winter weekday exceeded Summer weekday ADT by approximately 20 percent. To maintain a conservative approach, a February (Winter)weekday was selected as the basis for traffic analysis of the Rendezvous Development. Though the weekday condition was selected as the basis for this analysis, it is important to note that Year 2000 Winter weekend traffic volumes along Berthoud Pass exceeded Winter weekday traffic volumes by approximately 40 percent. Table 1 depicts the recorded Year 2000 daily traffic volumes along US 40 south of the Berthoud Pass summit. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 5 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1. US 40 Traffic Volume Comparison Location Year 2000 Weekday ADTYear 2000 Weekend ADT Winter Summer Winter Summer US 40 at 6,730 5,550 9,520 9,330 Berthoud Pass ,7 ADT=Average Daily Traffic Volume(2-way) --------- Turning movement counts were recorded manually at the intersection of US 40 and King's Crossing Road over a 10-hour time period, between 8:00 am and 6:00 pm. Information included in the Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis was used as the basis for the peak hour movements shown at the US 40 /CR 72/804 intersection. The existing Average Daily Traffic Volume of between 11,800 and 13,000 vehicles per day(vpd)along US Highway 40 is based traffic count information published on the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)website (www.dot.state.co.us). FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 6 cr) E CTJ 0 cz 59) 0) U) 0 0 lJorls G C\j L— cz o ,.L-7 10(s .2 ca lo�)a��o�N�N�o 0 Vo co IT CL 4) 0co CR8 4a) CR 7 (D (0 10 9 If ID �ZS C7 x W x x LLJ X x x 0 x X X Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis III. SITE TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS A. Site Roadways/Access As illustrated on Figure 2, Rendezvous Road, the primary access to US 40, will serve both the East Mountain and the West Mountain areas. To the west, it will also provide a connection to County Road 72. In the west portion of the development, the Fraser Valley Parkway would provide north-south flow on the site. As part of the Fraser-Winter Park Roadway Network Planning Study, the Fraser Valley Parkway (FVP) was shown as an alternative north-south route in the Valley to provide relief for US 40 through Winter Park and Fraser. The intent of this proposal is to construct the Fraser Valley Parkway as a 2-lane roadway through the West Mountain parallel to US 40. This roadway would provide an additional linkage between King's Crossing Road and CR 72 in relief of US 40. The plan for Rendezvous access to US 40 is summarized by Figure 4 and by Table 2. In developing this plan, every attempt was made to be consistent with the US 40 Conceptual Access Plan prepared as part of the Fraser-Winter Park Roadway Network Planning Study. Table 2. Proposed US 40 Site Access Access Location Access Type Comments : Point Access to West Mountain and 1 West side of US 40 Full-movement, signalized' Community First Bank, will be aligned opposite Safeway access on east side of US 40 2 West side of US 40 Right-in/Right-out Access to Planning Area 3Wc 3 East side of US 40 Full-movement, unsignalized Access to Planning Area 14E 4 Both sides of US 40 Full-movement, signalized' US 40/Rendezvous Road Right-In/Right-Out, Intersection 5 East side of US 40 unsignalized Access to Planning Area 12E 6 West side of US 40 Full-movement, signalizeT-1 Access to Planning These accesses would be signalized when warrants are met In addition to the already mentioned ability of Rendezvous traffic to access CR 72 on the north and King's Crossing Road on the south (both of which provide access to US 40), the Rendezvous plan calls for six accesses on US 40. The primary access will, of course, be Rendezvous Road, located in the middle of the project. This access is anticipated to be a full- movement, signalized intersection. As shown on Figure 4 and in Table 1, the other accesses are planned to directly serve development Planning Areas. It is important to note that access #6, which provides access to the commercial development in Planning Area lWa, is proposed to be a full-movement access. In the original access plan, this access was shown as providing right-in/right-out movements only. The purpose of this change is to provide relief to the US Highway 40 / Rendezvous Road intersection. P-A FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 8 co 0 cow Q 0 > C E 0 0,;5 LU 10 maciy rnoc .EZZ C— U, C, C-1 017, 9 ds O 76 r U) U) �co w 0 ,4 > Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis B. Trip Generation Table 3 summarizes the trip generation rates used in this analysis. Daily trips to be generated by single and multi-family residences within Rendezvous were estimated based on standard trip generation rates published by Grand County. Information included in the Marvvale Traffic Impact Analysis was used as the basis for the Lodging trip generation rates. The rate of 30 vehicle-trips per day per 1,000 square feet of commercial space was based on information from Pitkin County research. Documentation of these trip generation rates is included in Appendix A. The AM and PM peak hour rates for the single and multi-family residential properties were calculated based on peak hour percentages determined at Snowmass Village, a mountain area with many similarities to the Fraser Valley. The peak hour rates for other uses were extracted from earlier Maryvale analyses. Table 3. Trip Generation Rates Residential Rates (Trips per Dwelling Unit) Commercial Rates: Single-Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Lodging (Trips per 1,000 SF) :: Daily 81 5 r 4 2 304 AM Peak Hour 0.68 (8.5%)3 0.33 (6.6%) 0.31 (7.750_/._) 0.662 PM Peak Hour 0.70 (8.75%)' 0.43 (8.60/ 0.43 (10.75%)' 2.852 1 From Grand County Trip Generation Rates 2 From Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis, by Leigh, Scott& Cleary 4 Peak Hour Percentages determined in Snowmass Village Roadway System study From Pitkin County Retail Shop Trip Generation Rate -"No Transit System"scenario The estimated number of trips to be generated by the Rendezvous development was calculated based on the rates shown in Table 3; the results are depicted in Table 4. ni FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIO Page 10 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Table 4. Trip Generation Estimates Section Size Total Trips Generated Daily AM Peak Hour PIVI Peak Hour F_ Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total East Mountain 914 Units Residential (342 SFDU, 4,970 110 310 420 320 170 490 442 MFDU, 130 Lodge) Commercial 64.2 KSF 1 1,790 20 10 30 65 65 130 Sub-Total 1 6,760 130 320 1 450 385 235 620 West Mountain 3,821 Units (686 Residential SFDU, 17,785 375 1070 1,445 1,175 625 1,800 1857 MFDU, 1278 Lodge) Commercial 395.8 KSF 9,740 115 65 180 380 380 760 Sub-Total 1 27,525 490 1 11,135 1,625 1,555 1 1,005 1 2,560 TOTALS 1 34,285 620 1 1,455 2,075 1,895 1 1,215 As shown in the table, the East Mountain portion of Rendezvous is expected to generate approximately 6,760 daily trips while the West Mountain would generate approximately 27,525 trips. A total of approximately 34,285 daily trips are expected to be generated by the development. Of these trips, approximately 2,100 are expected to occur during the AM peak hour, and about 3,100 are expected to occur during the PM peak hour. Based on the mix of land uses proposed for the development and the typical composition of trip types for uses of this sort, it was estimated that 33 percent of trips generated by the proposed commercial land uses would be attributable to residential uses internal to the site. It should be noted that these estimates do not reflect the factor of"passby"trips. Passby trips are vehicle-trips already traveling along the roadway network adjacent to a development (usually a commercial development) that divert into the development to complete an errand, etc. Though passby trips contribute to traffic volumes entering and exiting a site, they do not add traffic to the adjacent roadway network. In the case of Rendezvous, information included in the ITE's Trip Generation suggests that passby trips.could comprise approximately 30 percent of the commercial site generated traffic volumes. Thus, the total trip generation for the Rendezvous development could be reduced by about 10 percent to account for the passby effect. However, in order to maintain a conservative approach to this analysis, no reduction was made to account for passby trips. FELSBURG Ili 0 LT & ULLEVIG Page 11 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis C. Trip Distribution/Assignment Of the external trips generated by the proposed development, it was estimated that approximately 60 percent would travel to and from the south along US 40 or Lion's Gate Road and the remaining 40 percent would travel along US 40 north of the site by the Year 2025. This distribution was formulated based on existing travel patterns in the area and future growth potential. A similar assumption formed the basis for traffic estimates included in the Fraser Valley Master Road Plan, completed by Grand County in May of 1999. The internal trips were distributed to commercial properties within Rendezvous in proportion to the estimated trip generation of each commercial use. As shown in Table 5, planning area IlWa is expected to attract the greatest share of the internal trips due to its high concentration of commercial activity, while planning area 13E is expected to attract the lowest share of internal trips. Table 5. Distribution of Internal Commercial Vehicle-Trips Area Planned for Commercial Percent Internal Trip Ends Attributable Development To This Zone 12E 6% 13E 3% 14E 4% IlWa 41% 2W 28% 3Wc 7% 9W 4% low 7% Using all of these assumptions, the estimated external and internal vehicle-trips were assigned to the roadway network. As shown on Figure 5, the buildout of Rendezvous is expected to account for a range of 9,700 to 13,475 vehicles per day along US 40 through the site. Approximately 11,900 vehicle-trips per day are expected to be added north of the site, and approximately 16,750 vehicles are assigned south of the site along US 40. It is estimated that . approximately 11,800 vehicles per day (vpd) will traverse Rendezvous Road west of US 40 and 5,750 vpd will travel along the same facility east of US 40. FELSBURG (4HOLTCu ULLEVIG Page 12 FELSBURG 3 C� HOLT & ULLEVIG rr 9 pp a72J� S �s rk ��59��rr��so� rr,3ppyW• �r� � 400 700 her 9 Fraser Valley Parkway >p •?, N OSp -410 °i wrn$ 34(20 g9�r� off\° job 5,750 3a\oNgo A>� � s od`ard�r6 2262242�� r�sJ/ 125900 C � y a ca 0 5 w 5 650 `r �a. 950 King's Crossing Rd. N y0 S o 'p •+ 12,525 (i 5,125 LQ W y hero �� CD 1,x\2 2� !p N Q0., 9(13) \� oN 2 150(154) a Ni O LEGEND 0 �a XXX(XXX) = AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes XXXX = Average Daily Traffic Volumes Figure 5 ' 0 Site Generated Buildout Traffic Volumes North Rendezvous Update 04.086 9!23/04 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis IV. LONG TERM FUTURE ANALYSIS A. Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic is that traffic which would be expected on the roadway system even without the development of the Rendezvous project. Background traffic volume projections were completed based on information included in the Traffic Volume Report published by CDOT. According to this source, traffic along US 40 is anticipated to grow at an annual rate of approximately 1.5 percent over a 20-year period. By CDOT requirement, future traffic analyses must be completed for a 20-year time horizon. Accordingly, background traffic projections were developed for a Year 2025 scenario. The 1.5 percent growth rate was applied to the existing daily traffic volumes along US 40 to estimate the projected Year 2025 background Average Daily Traffic (ADT) along US 40 in the vicinity of the site. It is anticipated that US 40 will become increasingly congested as traffic volumes continue to grow. With this increased traffic congestion, the peak period of traffic flow along US 40 will likely "spread out" over a longer period. The peak hour will thus effectively decrease as a percentage of the ADT along US 40. Therefore, a growth rate of approximately 1.0 percent per year was applied to the existing peak hour turning movements to estimate Year 2025 peak hour background traffic. To account for Fraser Valley Parkway serving trips related to Fraser Valley development beyond Rendezvous when completed as a continuous route, background traffic volumes were assigned to FVP based on information contained in the Fraser Valley Master Road Plan. The road plan projected that the construction of a continuous FVP through the site would divert approximately 3,950 vpd away from US 40 through the project area. It was assumed that this diverted traffic would travel along a completed FVP through the site. The projected Year 2025 background traffic volumes are depicted on Figure 6. B. Total Traffic Volumes The site generated buildout traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 were added to the projected Year 2025 background traffic shown on Figure 6 to arrive at the projected total Year 2025 traffic volumes shown on Figure 7. It is important to note that these total traffic volumes are based on the assumption that Rendezvous will be developed based on a 20-year buildout schedule, placing completion of development at the Year 2025. This represents a particularly aggressive construction schedule. It is likely that Rendezvous will be constructed based on a buildout schedule of approximately 30 years. However, to be conservative and to be consistent with CDOT's 20-year planning horizon requirement, intersection operations were analyzed based on a 20-year buildout. Thus, the analysis is likely to show a need for improvements in a time frame sooner than may be necessary. .1 FELSBURG 1-10 L T & ULLEVIG Page 14 co N cll O E N U. L ' U ;W ' r 01301 - 4�,Q 6°) � U L �� X51151 •� � H 5q°12o151� Ln 17 Gate Rd• m co 's�2s CO N O� r r r � r r \ r \ r r \ . N �4 0>1 1 LI 7N pyo f 1 N �3\ E �1 �1 _U E 1 � 4 CCS I 00 TO� cz CR U-1 CR 72 = a 8040 004"o a`) c IL D � �Lp� 0 Ln r CL Q 1 Off ' Q Q CL ID stss� W X x (os)s��_ r 71/" o� a (Oooz~ o LU x X ' a wxa .� �� z PFELSBURCi ( � I O L T & ULLEVIG I--- _o��°o °� on o c"ir �?g Co rro°//ya mak` 6 r y�y/rte 0 0 0 "app 9p�9�5 5)Vis) 40 2�°2 �Ij R 4519 e 4 650 �0(eo1`. �o(0Jr�oJ s a �i s/rs 5,900 �r o0 Fraser Valley Parkway J x] > �j ro r � 's9(rs N 95 � ys go�9ps1 k o 5,750 31,300 ' N W i C7 W 1�yya 9,600 0 cr> 4,430 King's Grossing Rd. 0 pi O Co 12,525 ' N 5,625 ysss 61e°\2o� o C J R gyro/ N 0 10(15) CD 10(1 N 5) 3� 5(5)—> 0(45 5(5)— N16 (160) C7 y ✓O J ' LEGEND DO XXX(XXX) = AM(PM)Peak Hour Traffic Volumes XXXX = Average Daily Traffic Volumes Volumes estimated for analysis purposes,not shown here. Figure 7 ' Year 2025 Total Traffic Volumes North Rendezvous Update 04/086 10121/04 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis As an additional consideration, adding the site-generated traffic to the long-term future projections results in a conservative estimate of the total traffic because it assumes that Rendezvous was not considered at all in the CDOT growth rates. Based on this approach, the vehicle-trips generated by Rendezvous are expected to increase the US 40 ADT to approximately 29,800 vpd north of the site, approximately 30,200 vpd through the site, and approximately 34,000 vpd south of the site. C. Future Roadway Laneage Based on projected Year 2025 total traffic volumes, roadways in the vicinity of the site should be classified as follows: Rendezvous Road west of US 40 is anticipated to carry as many as 13,550 vpd with buildout of Rendezvous. General planning guidelines in the Fraser-Winter Park Roadway Planning Study outline laneage requirements based on daily traffic volumes. According to these guidelines, 2- lane arterial roadways should be widened to 4 lanes when daily traffic volumes exceed 12,000 vpd. Though Rendezvous Road is projected to exceed 12,000 vpd in daily volume, there will be few or no accesses along the critical section west of US 40. Therefore, operational analyses were performed which indicate acceptable AM and PM peak hour traffic operations along a 2- lane Rendezvous Road. Based on this evaluation, it is recommended that Rendezvous Road west of Fraser Valley Parkway be constructed as a 2-lane facility. Rendezvous Road is anticipated to carry approximately 5,750 vpd east of US 40, which implies classification as a 2-lane collector roadway. It is, therefore, recommended that Rendezvous Road be constructed as a 2-lane roadway east of US 40. Fraser Valley Parkway is projected to carry between 4,650 vpd and 6,000 vpd at buildout of Rendezvous. It is recommended that Fraser Valley.Parkway be constructed as a 2-lane roadway throughout the site. As discussed earlier, background traffic volume estimates for FVP through the site were based on information in the Fraser Valley Master Road Plan. P-A FELSBURG HOLT & ■ ULLEVIG Page 17 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis D. US 40 Traffic Control The intersections of US 40 with Rendezvous Road, King's Crossing Road and the access to Planning Area 3Wc are projected to warrant signalization prior to or by the Year 2025 based on signal warrant criteria included in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). A more detailed warrant analysis of the US 40/ Rendezvous Road intersection was performed to determine the time at which signalization will be needed. It was found that the intersection would likely need signalization by the Year 2009 based on a 20-year Rendezvous buildout and the Year 2013 based on a 30-year Rendezvous buildout. To adequately serve future travel demand associated with Planning Area lWa, a signal may be desirable in the future. As will be discussed in section F of this chapter, a signal could be installed at this location without adversely affecting operations on US 40. Therefore, when warrants are met, a signal may be implemented at the 1 Wa access. This traffic control is generally consistent with the US 40 traffic control proposed in the Fraser- Winter Park Roadway Planning Study, which anticipated signalization of the US 40 Rendezvous Road intersection and the US 40 / King's Crossing Road intersection. That study also anticipated potential signalization of access#11, the access to Planning Area 3Wc. E. Auxiliary Lane Requirements According to CDOT, the access category for US 40 in the vicinity of the site is NR-B, Non-Rural Arterial. Its posted speed limit varies between 35 MPH and 55 MPH. The State Highway Access Code specifies the following regarding the need for turn lanes on such a roadway: • A left-turn deceleration lane and taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour left ingress turning volume greater than 10 vph. 0 A right turn deceleration lane and taper is required for any access with a projected peak hour right ingress turning volume greater than 25 vph. • Acceleration lanes may be required when, among other criteria, the posted speed along a facility is greater than 40 MPH. By comparing the traffic volumes shown on Figure 7 with the criteria in the Access Code, the auxiliary lane requirements at each of the US 40 accesses can be determined. For the purpose of this determination, the US 40 posted speed was assumed to exceed 40 MPH north of Rendezvous Road and to be 35 MPH south of Rendezvous Road. The resulting auxiliary lane requirements are depicted in Table 6. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 18 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Table 6. Auxiliary Lane Requirements - US 40 Intersections Intersection Auxiliary Lane Requirements #1 —Safeway/Community First ► Left-turn and right-turn deceleration lanes along both US 40 access approaches to the intersection.' 1 ► Left-turn deceleration lane along southbound US 40. #2-Access to Planning Area ► Right-turn deceleration lane and acceleration lane northbound 14E along east side of US 40. ► Left-turn acceleration lane along middle of southbound US 40 for westbound left-turn. #3- US 40/ Rendezvous Road ► Left-turn and right-turn deceleration lanes along both US 40 #4-Access to Planning Area approaches to the intersection. 12E ► Right-turn deceleration lane northbound along east side of US 40. If unsignalized: 0 Northbound left-turn deceleration lane in the middle of US 40. ► Southbound right-turn deceleration lane on the west side of US 40. #5-Access to Planning Area o Left-turn acceleration lane along middle of northbound US 40 for 1 W eastbound left-turn. If signalized: 0 Northbound left-turn deceleration lane in the middle of US 40, 0 Southbound right-turn deceleration lane on the west side of US 40. US 40/CR 72/804 ► Left-turn and right-turn deceleration lanes along both US 40 approaches to the intersection. US 40/ King's Crossing Road ► Left-turn and right-turn deceleration lanes along both US 40 approaches to the intersection. Auxiliary lanes recommended based on estimated traffic volumes entering and exiting the commercial access aligned opposite Planning Area 3Wc. May be adjusted based on more detailed information regarding the configuration and purpose of this particular access. As shown in the table, deceleration lanes are recommended for all movements entering the site accesses. Acceleration lanes are recommended for turning movements exiting the site at access #2, and a left-turn acceleration lane is recommended for access #5 (if unsignalized). P., FELSBURO HOLT & ULLEVI(,j Page 19 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis F. Long Range Future Traffic Operations Intersection Operations Analysis of traffic operations at key intersections was performed based on the projected Year 2025 total traffic volumes depicted on Figure 7. Level of service worksheets are included in Appendix B. The results are depicted on Figure 9. As shown, the four signalized intersections along US 40 (CR 72/804, Planning Area 3Wc access, Rendezvous Road, and King's Crossing Road) are projected to operate at LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours based on 2025 total traffic volumes and the lane geometry shown on Figure 9. The left-turn movements entering US 40 from the unsignalized accesses are projected to operate at LOS D or better during each of the two peak hours by the Year 2025. The access to PA 1W was analyzed both as a signalized intersection and as an unsignalized intersection. As outlined in Table 5, unsignalized traffic control would require the installation of an acceleration lane along US 40 to maintain LOS D operations. Signalization of the access would result in LOS A intersection operations. Operational analysis of the unsignalized intersection of Rendezvous Road with Fraser Valley Parkway indicates LOS F conditions for northbound and southbound Fraser Valley Parkway left- turn movements. The provision of exclusive left-turn lanes for these movements is recommended to prevent left-turn queues from blocking through and right-turning vehicles along these approaches. It is also recommended that traffic volumes at this intersection be monitored closely to determine whether future conditions require signalization. Signal Progression State Highway Access Code standards relative to this segment of US 40 (NR-B) indicate'that one access will be granted to each parcel, if it does not create safety or operational problems. In addition, the Code states that full-movement access shall be granted at one-half mile spacing, or where a signal progression analysis indicates good progression of 30 percent efficiency or better, or does not degrade the existing signal progression. As shown on Figure 4, the intersections of US 40 with Rendezvous Road and King's Crossing Road are approximately '/2 mile apart and are both proposed to be signalized. The US 40 access to PA 1W is located between these two intersections, approximately 1,500 feet south of Rendezvous Road. A signal progression analysis was performed to evaluate signal coordination along US 40 from the north end of the project (CR 72) south through the Town of Winter Park. Two signal progression scenarios were tested based on either 6 or 7 signalized intersections along this section of US 40, spanning approximately 2.5 miles between CR 72 and Vasquez Road. Signalizing the intersection of US 40 with the access to Planning Area IlWa would add a seventh signalized intersection to this section. The results of the progression analysis are summarized in Table 7. PFELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIO Page 20 co '0 a) j cc) C\l o U) a) ,- 0 �� ¢� > cz C: -a cz c a) E E c: 0 0 Cc U , cz NO O -6 v5 J100 C\141 E E J >0=75 0 c > 0 .2 Co crj (DF- (D -0 0 (D c) N co < = c U) CD -0 -5 0 0 (D 2 ou e -lid Rf CR 72 cz co < a) a) °_a)CL a- :=) .LM (D U) 2) U) E 2 5 U) 0 o 0 15; U) � ' < < .0 41 CD (3 Z ��a �11i' CL wyC 0 ui 0 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Table 7. US 40 Progression Results Progression Factor(percent) Analyzed Condition Northbound US 40 Southbound US 40 AM Peak PIVI Peak AM Peak PM Peak 6 signalized 29 29 28 29 intersections 7 signalized 29 29 28 29 intersections As shown in the table, AM and PM peak hour progression efficiency would not be degraded with the addition of a traffic signal to thelWa access. Therefore, the potential signalization of the PA 1 W access to US 40 could be implemented within the guidelines of the Access Code, Additional analysis was performed to identify a "window" within which the 1 W access could be located without degrading progression along US 40 or lying too close to adjacent accesses. The currently proposed location of this access is approximately 950 feet north of King's Crossing Road. It was determined that the access could be located anywhere between 660 and 1,075 feet north of King's Crossing Road without affecting the progression. Progression diagrams are included in Appendix C. PFELSBURG ti o i-,r & ULLEV113 Page 22 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis V. US HIGHWAY 40 IMPROVEMENTS Traffic volume growth along US 40 was analyzed to evaluate the need for widening the roadway from 2 to 4 lanes and the timing of such an improvement. US Highway 40 south of, through, and north of the site is projected to carry at least 17,200 vpd by the Year 2025 based on growth in background traffic volumes. The addition of vehicle-trips attributable to the Rendezvous development is expected to increase the US 40 ADT to at least 28,600 vpd. Based on a conversation with CDOT Region 3 Staff held in August of 2004, enhanced two lane roadways (auxiliary lanes and good shoulders) are expected to accommodate up to 22,500 vpd. Widening to four lanes is desirable when traffic volumes exceed this threshold. By CDOT requirement, future traffic analyses must be completed for a 20-year time horizon. As noted earlier, total traffic projections and capacity analyses were thus developed for a 20- year Rendezvous buildout scenario. This assumption is conservative, as a 30-year buildout is more likely to occur. To account for the possible longer buildout time frame, both the 20-year and 30-year buildout scenarios were analyzed to evaluate the potential need for future widening of US 40. It was assumed that both Rendezvous and US 40 traffic growth would follow a straight-line pattern into the future. Figure 9 depicts the straight-line growth in US 40 traffic volumes to the Year 2025, including background traffic growth and traffic generated by proposed development within Rendezvous. As shown on this plot, US 40 traffic volumes north of King's Crossing Road are expected to exceed 22,500 vpd by the Year 2020 based on a 30-year buildout scenario and by the Year 2015 based on a 20-year buildout. Therefore, it is estimated that US Highway 40 should be widened from two to four lanes within this time period. Because of the many elements comprising traffic on US 40, it would be appropriate for discussions to be held in the near future between the affected parties to determine responsibility for this improvement. 09 FELSBURG I-JOLT & ULLEVIG Page 23 FELSBURG rIHOLT & ULLEVIG II US 40 'traffic Volume Growth 34,000 . [7 32,000 - 20-year buildout 7� ■ scenario ■ 80,000 -s 30-year buildout . .. Scenario Q 28,000 2 to 4 lane.Widening > threshold 26,000 E Z 24;000 0 > i 22,000 ---+ yrs Project ted 20,000 rr �¢' ` .,r. -°h Time Window for ` '., US 40 Widening t° R4 18,000 ell 16,000 N 14,000 12,000 t ' 10,.400 - 6,000 t— c7 n � G r- N C+f X71' 'W t0 f`� CEf' Cif O r pf P P r r T- V— p p ¢ J N N CV N N o N .N � N � LV N tQV CQy Year Figure 9 ' US Highway 40 Traffic Growth 0 (North of King's Crossing Road) North Rendezvous Update 04/086 10/28/04 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis VI. SUMMARY / SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The traffic impact analysis of the proposed Rendezvous development in Fraser, Colorado is based on a land use plan that includes residential, commercial, and recreational properties. Development proposed for the west side of US 40 (i.e. "West Mountain") is estimated to generate approximately 27,525 daily vehicle-trips and the East Mountain is estimated to generate approximately 6,760 vpd at full buildout. It is estimated-that the East and West Mountains combined will generate approximately 34,285 vehicle-trips per day. Of these trips, approximately 2,100 are anticipated to occur during a typical weekday AM peak hour, and approximately 3,100 vehicle-trips are expected to occur during a typical PM peak hour. To accommodate the vehicle-trips expected to be generated by the proposed Rendezvous Development, the following roadway improvements are recommended: US Highway 40 Based on growth in traffic volumes along US 40, it is estimated that the roadway should be widened from 2 to 4 lanes between the Towns of Winter Park and Fraser between the Years 2015 and 2020. The 4-lane section is expected to be adequate to accommodate the estimated growth in traffic volumes that will occur with the completion of Rendezvous. Because of the many elements comprising traffic on US 40 and causing the need for widening of the highway, it will be important for discussions to be held inthe near future between the affected parties to determine responsibility for this improvement. Rendezvous Road Rendezvous Road is proposed to function as the primary east-west connection to both the East Mountain and West Mountain sections of the Rendezvous development. To accommodate site traffic, it is recommended that Rendezvous Road be constructed as a two-lane roadway east and west of US 40. Fraser Valley Parkway Fraser Valley Parkway is proposed to be constructed parallel to US Highway 40 within the West Mountain area of Rendezvous, providing for site circulation as well as regional relief to US 40. Based on projected Year 2025 total traffic volumes, it is recommended that Fraser Valley Parkway be constructed as a 2-lane roadway throughout the site. US Highway 40/King's Crossing Road Intersection Signalization is expected to be warranted with background traffic volume growth and the addition of traffic volumes related to the Rendezvous development. It is recommended that the US 40 / King's Crossing Road intersection be signalized when warranted. In addition, it is recommended that the eastbound approach to the intersection be widened and striped to accommodate exclusive left-turn, through, and right-turn lanes. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 25 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis US Highway 40/County Road 721804 Intersection It is recommended that the ultimate cross-section of US 40 at this intersection include left-turn and right-turn deceleration lanes to accommodate traffic entering CR 72 from US 40. US 40 Site Access Plan To provide sufficient access to the site, the US 40 access plan developed for the Fraser— Winter Park Roadway Planning study was adapted to the proposed development. The proposed plan for site accesses to US 40 is depicted on Table 8. As shown, a total of 6 US 40 accesses are proposed along an approximate 1.8 mile length of US 40 to accommodate the Rendezvous development. Access types include Right-In / Right-out and full-movement accesses. The full-movement accesses at Community First Bank (1), Rendezvous Road (4) and Planning Area 1W (6) are anticipated to be signalized when warrants are met. Table 8. Proposed US 40 Site Access Access Location Access Type Comments Point Access to West Mountain and 1 West side of US 40 Full-movement, signalized' Community First Bank, will be aligned opposite Safeway access on east side of US 40 2 West side of US 40 Right-in/Right-out Access to Planning Area 3Wc 3 East side of US 40 Full-movement, unsignalized Access to Planning Area 14E 4 Both sides of US 40 Full-movement, signalized' US 40/ Rendezvous Road Intersection 5 East side of US 40 Right-In/Right-Out, Access to Planning Area 12E unsignalized 6 West side of US 40 Full-movement, signalizedAccess to Planning Area 1W These accesses would be signalized when warrants are met FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 26 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX A TRIP GENERATION RATE DOCUMENTATION ' PO-1 FELSBURG CHOLT &, ULLEVIG Appendix A - - - - . - .: *a• 1''•1 W 't'1 f;�" .bz- 4 C :}, 7 t i 'I I. �' '�.- xf r-".-;'-'� �*a. .�., ..k .. ,! ^,c-••,.1 .4... "+.r'' •r'' .. f'"='y:;-.:' �:� x:.,';:! a.'``•�i•:r!:�t / ,!':: :,•.^..,,a. .t�`• `r na,• ""l w ..,. rr : t' .r J.- ••.a,. 7.� r1 rti`' r. C (-C. .:i.'4 ex .•._+'•ii:'�`✓ F '"".`" .`'fit �f''-•.;:a^.:T +1' =a^' 'i :,i::�^,w.,".'j:,:.- _'i.'. Y.r,,,:,•L 'r`.-:'p'•,a r,••°..'• �,. 77. ..r .�, ..y -` 1 --.1' /J -�� - 'c. - './. --r ry =�,.,y,,:•�1 _ .(_ �S, ., 'tn' -aa: '•�' is 1. •,.,:1.v. .•}. _ ~.y``• ,:,..yam• '- "'!:,'W- .Y''' •i':.7.r e .{','ry't^I;;i'.':•-•j rt ry.th"'"'1• ,w -tr'."✓ . •f "„• '.`,"?' ir`:-"'1, '",.'^' ,.1' .S', r"`S^,r'�":'*�``.'�'r r•h, _ ;ice F.., _+: � ,'P4 j r.Ya a.;1_13': r'.". ,_, ;, c _ __ : . - ':�' _ ,f J,. . • S •'. Yom' i- - 17 •� " a'♦�S-:�'. •,•.�i''�'� • . •- �' /`f.:r .'...J-.• !.:� _:.J•r.�-. ../• f, 11 .•,�Ar:S =1`� .'I+'�' \f.,:..�: ''fs Y X�' �. _-i.• 1. :rr•: ._ •;r.- i• i - �•^r.yr�j•':-1`�yYs�-•:✓..a�:: ., .•I.h•: { - moi' i '{r', ..'2 1 .t'.r r .r'n5` -r.•-'.''.;.-!-7'."'.'.'-. y.`: 't - ;.7 „y., :4,':,�.'; ;y;,..-.�t,n.;t r•-... ; 1�1 • ^J :'/•r:..„ ,_,r. -��.1�L 1i'�n•}a �: :i"it` � -:\•.^_•a-""''yr :,,;t. .. y..•� fr••�,.,,rr^,♦ .d+ .j- - ..,'�,"\• rC. ..N % 'r-'`Y�-_ - _;. ,:•r.L;J (' •'�:,\- -r `C'•.:z.r!-' '•I.)l:::�r'.-;L: ay,,,i a. ' a' :-.• _ _L i4,j' •!w„�� •.t.';-1. �,} T "i..f.\+` .1 5;�:.;,-' +F,. `,:.",,.�.p-�'''':C'.�: -rte;-•" ��,A,`, t3�.�.'y,°;(fy',,.1" S !.-%;` •♦It .1 - ten:•••., w•ti t'a r,'!-""F-ti• 'r•• ``�./+^, .r.!+. �'fYJ wy1.•ham •'^Y•:`,p"i-'�'/'w„••..'' w:,:'A Y'";••i�I.,,. •''•' "✓' j'•„',��i �`,I•_ 1. :_� '�j •y-:..,s:.�,,;,._. f,••r {.:..! 7 '.'.�1r. .:�K.. .y ��,'--'-.,•. .'' ,••a'',,"�."'.::?, . j _ -II. ---"'.\.y-. '•.`X. �7':��- � I , -. ate ;Y.� \•.� :,.1"::n 4` �, �.,. •i':-'. 'A!: r-;•jam 't• 1. a: ."r '>4r. E, �-�%^ '+_ a. : ..,1'1%,:`. '.!-,--�.ri..`�,S.::Z_'v. '`ate•:" i•,.: . .. �i -?„: -. `i' J:.• + %c r 1, !.)E.-lr7 ?.:''.,'r:. , :.T-.?'4'. l »:}.'.. �►».i•'t :s% ••++....jj•� .:s•-r!Y•".k'.4.,•,;,to.•r;^,..r•}'::-. ",; �� •r.� :•••'c't'/err.``� µ;..: Y.y.�< ,zt.. •.•.e1�. "'.a. •:may'•-. •4 ..f` `M.' ,f, "'. _NIA - - , •. '�iL:''•ffi17,. .."•T-y--t'.t J• -'1',:.•n.;'T'. --- ,• 11.1'.4. •rl"s''"Y-`i '`'�: 'y.L.'."41;,;t.. •. :-,�,v�'- -'k'."?-'- ry="L:.-•�,r C. , :'�e' t' . _:.� I. '`'- -'J a.r.c k••'r .. '..1','.;"G.{.._i' _ :1: 'f'; �:;. '�%:•�,. ,t...;y . -2iT,':"_a:ell.Cr..k- J. ,.rr. Li: •.-f•r.�• .�,.#,.. •/ .a:-a,. �y,? :' ,?. �i>.= I' r r: - rrJ^.,.:d. .x:. �-; �,. 'i : .tom: -t''`' -w., +_`..' -,,• `3. ti'- "r� *,,r. '', 7-ri.�A'• 4; - w,a r i ;iti r1.i"" ': ,._7'}. ':!+'-f -.y ,;:-,:t:i1�.-•y: s•=• :��'.. , ..f..^••'h".'' .�';'\ .•r•t .na •'S,+�'.� T••• •.,. .{�... ''``ae� _.-""I. '.-l•, y� • . r "��..��r��r�'''"'CCCCCC,,,.y .. . ^` '4.r�• •,',.� a?" .,,'�.'...o:31�.�i. :i.`%.:`•.'`t:iY,� s`.• -.".fn„»n'::..F<z,...w ••'••.:..-• �"`::."•.:;,,:•}�::.•i�:: •.^a�,,j=.•t`.•w.,''y,�:y-..J•.• `ti �4 -c, '.?-,-i6 ' +•..j•. i'-.•.: .?/i:. -G. - - ""`•>''.r,- :x'`•.::..;'?i+:.^t::,:r, w, r'''••' :3 ''' ' -;. _... - s ,. •' _ .,:moi . :---- .a,is,,;•' ...1 _ j`' .o ---FRASER �CC�LZ3RAD . `:''�';,.,. �r'' �: ,. "� •-�..'! 'T._ •y,• i�•�f.,l`, -t- - '' ;'T� ,-. „t'.•�• _.- sf..:� .,.�r�`��`',�:,.•l- rG^. :.',� 1.• is S yC, -R.^•.}: ,'...:i,;,i•�r;•. •i•'T• :.1."i`.r., z% �'si:'='�4$::• y'=;.r' Y.:�-ti 'z,;�r!...ir. ,}�•. :Y ;`�i. ~Y ..', :-. _ :f is x�:.-. �N:��:;' ++ t i;.• 'r" ,,:!: :y y;. :jr.` ^ '" ,F;•«ter ,: ."S-' ,.a�.3�:'.rt.'•c 0- �,- x. t+'w:, '': ,�'...•.. `).:;r•..,d� •;, .1.. .;.' , a '�!.L'ai' '.S`"r"`.'' •Tt C-^..:'�;�•' .`�•,w� y. tea • r.l�• .. ;: ., Y' '� 1• .;. _• mak, ,t A...';? _ .` •t ^..:1r,''' !'.•" - L.Y:� - �- }^' - ? . _rY, - Tt �:- r; C r la'::;:�..{u )r'a r*r �' �. �. .7,y-•.•r. ;. ..f:•..i: .!'.t a':.,•- .�-:ti: f\:• - ,:�,r.:J�,. �;;:<1' ,T-.L:�:-T ,.,v).,..,. �'^'4•+•1'; '&--%_, a -`,`'i• r/ _ ,l,r,;,,s �,: }. :.5-; ,5... o',i t p-'t• ' �'.f y,.,,^3. +tC� .,.. '':�'%.:• !c'{:• "'--Y'+.' :1'r: '.\"._k:. :v&-.-4-...: r,:.:",,;I.`' :r2•:.,io+'c rr •' '. "- •A:•t'.'� Se• .. "J.2 �`'",,'r;•��.5 .,1 :' ,]'� ,+!':. ,•,- - C.''.',w:` _ w. �- 4^r'+ ;:; ^y K,c•'/ �'`s,+, ''-."�.`':^+!' •j.+, *',,'. -' ,.lT '''t'+q:•�• t" �. f,•!:'. ,'r'. 7.,7'..,C'�•i.IF :+f. of --i.y:• .i-,j i.,-_- a- '+.!•.i - "'•sem k.. 4- ...�.s`• ''- .f:�,i;'. '-t'-"•t''•z"--...rr�.,'�..,✓,..'a s '� 'r;^.' r� -_ _�,r•� r." :r',:+.'T,:_'_�._ _',r+J ,„''~`� `r' of '--!:rl..rrl.� l.- .. .� �u.,..]��a,r:. .!! jrC4.. 'r..- !'zi �,�r .`s '/ ....:,E "•ice :j'):••':..iy'�r•` '�- :''_• . _ �' . ,..:,4-, j. S,:. :moi-'•_>Z'r .� . - .--r`.....1 I T.. r�..':..Y. .i.: \ ;�:�N�.:7. - :,C -• :;: -'��`.. -�- ..'� ,I. #:_Fr..;�✓:�� 1a,'l;'�;.j'�vA.•��=:S:j.�•-i_.''r•=.:=V _ l.: `,{". 'i`'a• _ ,rr 'I. _r...v'{-•y. -'I.- . .-'r ,f = �-(': $, ' ..� .3 ti- ..�;\"-.f7,'„ .:• ./:' s) 1"' `,K"�„'. �r:f'c.'A„.::r:-^:' '„X'" .i:'' �r`i.Y :it..:i+:"!..'f� :'l"%^''i•'!�"'"'",,.�.J' ,t?''•,1:,�•'.r" k'f'Ti::. 3i�i i• ;' „/ ',..� ..'."'aiz� :`;.q: ..•✓•..i•:^ .,moi,\ .I -,,,'.;�.:,';• •y:k:'�'"'"'!:i:^;;s,... �,,_•••,•.. ..'�'a.' :..�,'":;•;'•,. ,� ,�^•• ,�.`) *•" �' a♦fr�-^', r"� - „7', .' , .5, .✓:�'•f.K:~ i!•~. ' '-�•'''Y,{r`C �.r^ 'i••. 'ii.• `. �'y ,,,; '•'1-;�i'..'i¢?"! •.r� :s I't.-1.�C 1,i, •. a-'SaS,1•"",7r tti .'n., 'S.'a� ,.'�J'i.. •`,..1:'• :f,:Zr _ ;•�-..... ;fir f'.-.":." ',.`.';^.,�Si�-�:�F,;,;�r•'�1"1'.. L:k..,+.y'af... .4. �;.•"ri.•., i` _ '- Y^� .:.. ia.J-: - :♦ .j'_j�l::-;,� ..::': a•.4: _lyy:Y`•c, n.r i s 1L. -,'•l,, F'.-_ -, -r••._ •�-1 '�!.Y•'•,':' 1,. _,iS- '��•-`^ .Si�'`:� _•'�12'`�- _ `-)'•t•J''n .r.:< .�_`ttr0`i •'�.'V'• _ :rLF.. s+i Y.o� .;y"''"':\. .As_- :S-`.+wb<Y4• a...'S::w *-'-• •----' -- ']•1.-.w'..•'s� %•::.r,7'-F"s0-;:r,i' ;S v; '[�}...R.rte..,...i. .w'ti. *r.•.: .'-%--' ^ :,1r,:' .;{', .,i ••.�,.f:;,i,s.:r. t,s Si Iy' ..i •''^�"++.' 't:j'" l,Mf',�"':,.%.I',r:: ;' %•;•'f '':r:% ...�"!i ".9.•'ti �: .'i}.. !'-•,•!}i,�7\'� '..(!.: _ ';\�.�.n`: •4'. ..:i�-• u:f'. ';.-'!r"fC:,'•i::�'X•' yd a: �.�.,..tv,••-.'_4••.L.ss -.i` -ate a1.�' t�.;_j I �• .:� �= )_ i:Y ,'Y .�r�.. ♦�:;s-�? ��+=�'. ,L�:7:; ,✓ "".'':. .sf'.i• ~'1.., '-,,. :'�;•_' + .:. ��i' �•J .ice .:.i: -.7✓.`-��'.. .1`: `x•,'.�'s� . -:'... ':xi i•t?>,••+:1 !' �-+'.�;� Z- /'-i. • :T..r. ...;..::��.' _�y.>,'�1;;-^••�::,,',`a .,1+:. --�•'^--'-. ','r„.. ,y.`1:�1.j.., ''r; at C\j CIJ co C3 to CV LO c 0 a. c m > cc a (3) to LU 0 CO q. Nv w Q* cc .00 cr) 0- to Cf) IT to V7 C\.l C.) i5 Q0 co ul 04 2—P, M C'. n 04 to Co Z 0 oU-) CY) 0)C) oto i cf) v cm cn 0 w f Z5 C6 vi cn OC6 C,- Ln cn N w v a co cn Cl) 0 04 cr) > > zi 0) m to co < cc -0 v w , 'T r- a Z ;z 0 a cr) LCI CO m cc cn (M ul w Ln 41i CM > to Q < r� ol Cl) cl� C, C\j cr) Lc) cn r� Ln C) 0 C\j -- -pt cc .E 6 0 CL 7E =, a) -be > co Z CD C cn a) cr) C.) cr) m 0 (L V* CM -w cr) CY co (a CY) 00 cn m 0 c U) N Ln Ln 0 C'4 t*-� W '4:r cc cm Ili — 0 Qj z > 0 CY c W Ci cr) C\j C\i mm Ir U) m cc of 0 M cn CM to C\l cli "'MCI .- 11, f- . <� . 0 cc < m mQF- 7M Cl) cr) Q C) 0 C) U. 0 (a 2 0 cr m CL C\l co C\l (m U) C13 C .2 LO 0 O c >Co Ln 0 a r a O tU 0 Ln (D y CA 0 >. tr) cl to Ulj 0) M CV CY r- C.) U* 0 19) m -0 cli G 15 t6 ON cm > (D U) a ad LL0 to CL.0 Q) ' C1 0W C5 6 0 a: x 0, co co .0 -2 r�- w E oi Ln Z 0 = CY a. Z 0 LL O to to Z X O C "0 "0 cr), -0 cc UO (D C cc U- lQ y U- c Cl t6 0 E E Cc ra (D E E E a a 0 CD E E 0 B " ' 0 o 0, 0' E M CL �- 0 a5 :-C 00 c a. 0 0 55 . X =a C--3 1 SNOWMASS VILLAGE ROADWAY SYSTEM ANALYSIS JUNE 1990 The Town for: wn of Snowmass Village Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 Banyan Avenue Loveland, CO e0538 Phone: 303-669-2061 In association with KRAGER & ASSOCIATES 2418 West 32nd Avenue Denver, CO 80211-3322 Phone : 303-477-6318 R,J;1' were calculated. . There are 117 single family dwelling units above counter A .and 287 multi-family dwelling units between counter A and counter B. The calculated trip generation rates are presented below. Single Family Area Daily 810/117 = 6.9 Vehicle trips/D.U. 8-9 AM 69/117 = 0.59 Vehicle trips/D.U. 4-5 PM 71/117 = 0.61 Vehicle trips/D.U. Multi-Family Area Daily 1233/287 = 4. 3 Vehicle trips/D.U. 8-9 AM 80/287 = 0.28 Vehicle trips/D.U. 4-5 PM 106/287 = 0.37 Vehicle trips/D.U. The calculated trip generation rates appear to be reasonable when compared to trip generation rates developed by Pitkin County . A copy of the Pitkin County trip generation rates are in Appendix A. The rates are also similar, in a proportional sense, with single family and multi-family rates shown in Trip Generation, 4th Edition, ITE. Information from the Snowmass Resort Association indicates that the dwelling unit occupancy was down 17 , 1 percent during that same week. If it is assumed that the 1988-89 ski year was average to good, then the traffic counts collected on March 26 and 27, ' 1990, should be increased by a factor of 1 . 17 . This would change the trip generation rates as shown below. Single Family Area Daily 948/117 = 8. 1 Vehicle trips/D.U. 8-9 AM 81/117 = 0.69 Vehicle trips/D.U. 4-5 PM 63/117 = 0.71 Vehicle trips/D.U. Multi-Family Area Daily 1443/287 = 5 .0 Vehicle trips/D.U. 8-9 AM 94/287 = 0. 33 Vehicle trips/D.U. 4-5 PM 124/287 = 0.43 Vehicle trips/D.U. 13 pitkin county - - 506 east main street aspen, coloredo B1611 PIPKIN COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY ENGINEERING 1985 TABLE I ASSUMED DAILY TRIP GENERATION RATES Vehicle Trip Generation StrongWeak No Total Transit Transit Transit Land Use Pyr.6onn Syutem Eystcm System 1. Residential Ia. Single Family dwelling 15/d. u. 4/d. u. 6/d. u. 7/d. u. b. Apartments d. u. 12/d. u. 3/d. u. 5/d. u. 6/d. ul Condominiums c. Lodges unit 8/unit 2/d.u. 4/d. u. 4/d.u. 2. Commercial a. Retail Shop floor area 40/1000 10/1000 20/1000 30/1000 (sq.ft. ) sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.' b. Eat & Drink (sq. ft. ) 60/1000 15/1000 25/1000 30/1000 sq.ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. c. Business Office (sq. ft. ) 20/1000 8/1000 12/1000 15/1000 sq. fto sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. 3. Schools student 2/student 200/1000 250/1000 250/1000 stu.. Stu. Stu. 4. Ski Areas ski lift 600/1000 100/1000 150/1000 200/1000 capacity skiers per cap. cap. cap. (skiers hour of cap. per hour) 5. Other varies 10/1000 4/1000 5/1000 5/1000 Public/ s. f. (bldgs) S. f. S. f. S. f. Recreational 5/acre (land) 2/acre 2 .5/acre 2 .5/acre r � N � � ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARDS � � t w � w � OAPTER 3 ROAD AND BRIDGE DESIGN CRITERIA 3.1 BASIC DESIGN POLICIES Roadway design shall be based on the projected traffic needs twenty (20) years after construction and shall encompass the needs from existing development, future development, and the proposed development. Trip generations from future development over the design period shall be based on zoning, existing land use, proximity to developed areas, historic growth, and other factors expected to influence development. Trip generations for proposed development should be based on the type of occupancy for which the development is designed and shall be formulated from the following: DEVELOPMENT TYPE TRIPS GENERATED Single Family 8 ADT/Unit Multifamily 5 ADT/Unit Other uses not listed above shall use trip generation values verified by other acceptable data sources. 3.2 ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS County roads are classified according to function. Functional classifications shall be established by the Engineering Department and they have the authority to determine which classification applies to any given road. The minimum road design standards are based on the following road classifications and can be found in TABLE 1. Typical cross-sections for unpaved local and collector roads can be found in FIGURE 4. 3.2.1 ARTERIAL SYSTEM The rural minor arterial road system, in conjunction with the rural principal arterial system, forms a network with the following service characteristics: a. Linkage of cities, larger towns, and other traffic generators (such as major resort areas) that are capable of attracting travel over similarly long distances. b. Integrated interstate and intercounty service. C. Internal spacing consistent with population density, so that all developed areas of the State are within reasonable distances of arterial highway. d. Corridor movements consistent with items (1) through (3) with trip lengths and travel densities greater than those predominantly served by rural collector or 9 r ganpuaddd 71n317n 13 llOHC� !D,dngS"I33 r r r r r r r r r r r r 1 r r Olddvmi 3mnin=i 3ONVN JNOI - S133HSMMOM SOI 8 XIaN3ddV szsf'pvuy lavdurl adv rd snoa2apuad L ar,%, L VL TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LED Intersection 14E Access & US 40 Agency/Co. FHU Jurisdiction Date Performed 8115102 Analysis Year 2025 Total Analysis Time Period AM peak Project Description Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: 14E Access North/South Street: US 40 tersection Orientation: North-South IStud y Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Northbound Southbound � InIn n M Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 615 15 5 775 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHIF 1.00 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 668 1 16 5 1 842 —1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- 2 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 15 0 10 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHIF 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, MFR 16 1 0 1 10 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NIB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12_ Lane Configuration L L R v(vph) 5 16 10 C (m) (vph) 905 333 654 v/c 0.01 0.05 0.02 95% queue length 0.02 0.15 0.05 Control Delay 9.0 16.4 10.6 LOS A C B Approach Delay 14.1 jApproach LOS – B Rights Reserved I Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d file:HC:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Lyle\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2kI 6.tmp 9/18/2004 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LED Intersection 14E Access & US 40 Agency/Co. FHU Jurisdiction Date Performed 8115102 Analysis Year 2025 Total Analysis Time Period PM peak Project Description Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: 14E Access 1—North/South Street: US 40 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStud y Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 1225 30 15 985 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 0.92 0.92 .92 0.92 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1331 t32 j 0 2 16 1070 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 t -- I Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal 1 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 25 0 15 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1 0 1 16 0 1 0 1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration I T-1 R I T Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(vph) 16 27 16 C (m) (vph) 581 196 792 V/c 0.03 0.14 0.02 95% queue length 0.08 0.47 0.06 Control Delay 11.4 26.3 9.6 LOS B D A Approach Delay 20.1 Approach LOS -- C Rights Reserved Copyright C 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Lyle\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2kI 9Amp 9/18/2004 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total PM Peak Hour 2: CR 72 & US 40 PA1Wa �* Lane Configurations , IdealFFl`iaw(vph'pl) 19p'0 1900 " 1'900 1900 1; 00 ' '1900 4 DO° X7`9 f „' t900; 1900 ' 1900 19Q0 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Fac#or 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 0 95 1dQ 1 00 0'95 1 0.0 Frt ' 00 0 92 1 00 1 00 0 85 y1 00 1 00 0 85 ne U#i 1 00 0 94 1 FIY I?raxe,CtOd 0.95 "I-rC)0 0-95 „ 7 OQ ,. . 0 05 ' y, 0° ' �f 0 C O w 1 00 11 �0q .'.,i. ., F Nar ..:. s'.1r..w w✓, M' .#�,.�. Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1699 1719 1656 1719 3438 1538 1719 3438 1538 5fa deFlotw (perm) 80 1699 671 11 0,19' , 1,zQ0 1Po 656 258 3438 1538 351 3438 1538 \ ofitme,(vpli} 65 45 60 30' 40 '' �c5t 975 145 45'^ 1°15, 1:05 Y , 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0.92 1 ) 228 71 .65" 33 43 54 . N, � r` Peak-hour factor, Acca F pvu( PH 0.92 0,92 0, 29 0,92 19 1234 1;4 F Lane Group Flow(vph) 228 120 0 65 76 0 54 1060 158 49 1234 114 t Turn Type (° ) Perm % Perm °5% .,. 5% '.Per°mo Perm°uPermol Perm Heavy Vehicles /0 5 Io 56/6 5 ases 2 6 4: :8 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 g $ E g O .0 36.0 36.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 56'0 56?: AO 0 Effective Green, G:ss) 36.0 36 0 56 0 36.0 517 0...,. 56". 55 0. Actuat14:g/C Ratio 0..36 0:36' X1;:.36' :'Q:36 Or56 0 ;>:.. 0 56.. 0 56 0 56 O.S6 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LOr" p`( p ) 1 61 „' 436 596' 144 1906 8 M; ` 197. 19 5 8,61' ane Gr Ca ; v h 46 v/s Ratio Prot 0,07 0.05 0.31 c0.36 v/s Ratio:F�errri, c0.1;8 0,05 0 21 "' 0 10; 0 14, 0:47 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.20 0.15 0.13 0.38 0.55 0.18 0.25 0.64 0.13 Urllforrri!<D�lay d1 24.9 : 22:0 21 6 21 5 ;12 3 14`6 11. , 2' 15':1 10.;5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.44 0.66 lncrerrlental (delay, d2 3.6 0:7 0.7 03 Delay(s) 28.7 22.8 22.4 21.9 19.6 15.1 11.3 8.1 8.1 7.2 revel of: eivice C C C C B °` B , P B; "A A Approach Dela s 26.6 22.1 14.8 8 Approach L©5. C C I ; . MMMINIMM, n,1 ssa r fi xt' e ay HCM FVolume reto Capacity ratio 03a HCI!(F Level of Seivlce ,. „ B ; 1.58 Chid e Length (s) 100 0 ', Sum of lost the(s) 8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.1% ICU Level of Service B Critici Laie Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 FELSBUENGL-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total AM Peak Hour 3: US 40 & Safeway Community First PA 1W NO W magnum Lane Configurations tt r tt r A jp OQ 0, 104-NO q, Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 00 ane 0 n1w : Frt VP 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.86 T9S 00 0 95 j[r0a 10 T Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 3438 1538 1719 3438 1538 1719 1566 1719 1563 Q'i °li' 34361:538 ' 599 3438 1538 1306'11566 1313 1 563 ""', 4__ - 0 � . 0; Satd. Flow(perm) 4 '0 4 4 A 0`�..,',,-,;,,,, -.8 71 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.921 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0�92 A43 5 4V 14U 43 Lane Group Flow(vph) 33 804 22 33 647 43 43 48 0 76 54 0 Ole, H, Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected `2 tee�t' d Plisses Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Wed G ��1' 10 117:0, -t&01� Act e 0 , er 0 % 0:,, .0� � Effective Green, g (s) 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Act- 675 5 :,& 75 0 7 jr,' 0 1, P, 1' ` Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5ygl: 115 ��2 4 2, '6n&Q_ 11;54- ::'2, ,2 L Q - -, ', 2.,R�79;�, fv.ph, 2 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.19 0.03 0.03 03 c0 v/c Ratio O66 0.31 0.02 0.07 0.25 6..04 0.,19 0 18 0.34 0.20 �3 3.& .2, 41 �,W 6 3§17: 3: 3 Progression Factor 0.78 0.79 0.59 0.44 0.64 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . In3- Delay(s) 2.8 3.5 1.9 1.8 2.7 1.2 37.6 37.0 40.7 37.4 r LD 6 A� Approach Delay(s) 3.5 2.6 37.3 39.3 A Q 6 ervicer A y C LeVe' H .32 CM Volume to Capacity ratio 7. H 4, mi �o,�� os im Oy fh,�,O intersection Capacity Utilization 39.8% ICU Level of Service A ............. 9 Ipt Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 FELSBUENGL-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total PM Peak Hour 3; US 40 & Safeway/ Community First PA 1 Wa Access EM Lane 1 eat�Fiowl v �ti'ns 190 ,.. a (.I? ,p) 0 1900' I00* 1900 .. :: Q �1OLi ;.!t9�C1 V 1900 ;, 1900' �19Q�Sr 19Q0 :1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ..cr� r ` ^ � , X�r � L,ane�Ut�l Facto1 00 0 88 1 '00 1 00 0 97 00 1 00 1 00 ' 1 00 1 Frt 1 00 0.85 0 85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.86 Ffi l?�oteo#ed00 Satd. Flow (prot) 0.95:.x. .,. 1719 2707 1538 1719 3335 1538 1719 1566 1719 1559 F,t Permitted :.'' t}.1� Satd. Flow(perm) 346 2707 1538 397 3335 1538 1293 1566 1313 ^ 1559 Volume(vph� : 1 :5 970 ,:.. +60 40, 90 5 55 36 0.92 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 Peak-hour vahtar, PHF 0 ACI Flo p.:.) 92 0.92 0156 3„1# 4 7C6p �" Y "+ 0$ 5 SCJ Lane Group Flow(vph) 136 1054 65 76 1272 76 60 48 0 98 65 0 ye �v Turn Perm PermPerm 5 pe5rom/0 Perm � Perm Protected Phaes 4 0 2 , Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 A ,74 0 ;`,:1& 0 18 0` Effective Green, g (s)) 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 18.0 18.0 18,0 18.0 18.0 18.0 g 0.74 0;74 0;74 0.74 Actuated /G;,Ratio. 0 18 0 1'8 0 1 Clearance 06G, rpTimes 5.6 20(73 1 38 :';:294 2:46 ;:1138 2332$0 Lane Gr. Cap'(vph) 1 vis Ratio Prot 0.39 0.38 0.03 0.04 �/s Ratio Perm. c0 39 0.04f 0.19 05 0 0 c0 07 Uniform Dela ,;d1;, „ o5sa ` ;' , :,3.1 3 �3` 34 7 36:3; 35 3 v/c Ratio 3 0.53 0.06 0.26 0.52 0.07 0.26 0.17 0.42 0 Y 5,•13. 3 5 ,, 4 2 ,;1 ; Progression Factor 2.92 3.02 4.86 0.62 0.58 0.38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 r Del (s)ntal Delay;d2 6 8 Oc9, 0 1 1 23.117.6 17.2 4.3 3.8 1.5 37.9 36.0 41.6r 37,0 Level of,Service. w B B A f p D, pF A D Approach Delay(s) 18.2 3.7 37 1 39.8 Approach LOS B A ',".' ' . a iHC:,'1Average Control Delay ' 13 1 HCM Leuel.of Service "` B' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 s✓ycle Length�(s} 100 0' Sura of lost time(s) 8 0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.3% ICU Level of Service E r c' Critical LaneGraup; r r r Baseline Synchro 5 Report FELSBUENGL-FF51 Pagel r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d —TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: LED Agency/Co. : FHU Date Performed: 10/2/02 Analysis Time Period: AM peak Intersection: 3Wc access & US 40 Analysis Year: 2025 Total Project ID: Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: 3Wc Access North/South Street: US 40 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 775 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 842 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 a 9 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NE SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config R v (vph) 5 C(m) (vph) 699 v/C 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay 10.2 LOS B Approach Delay 10.2 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: LED Agency/Co. : PHU Date Performed: 10/2/02 Analysis Time Period: PM peak Intersection: 3Wc access & US 40 Analysis Year: 2025 Total Project ID: Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: 3Wc Access North/South Street: US 40 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 995 15 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0. 92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1081 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? Yes Yes Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume is Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 Percent Grade M 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes I Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config R v (vph) 16 C(m) (vph) 590 v/c 0.03 95% queue length 0.08 Control Delay 11.3 LOS B Approach Delay 11.3 Approach LOS B HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total AM Peak Hour 2: CR 72 & US 40 PA 1Wa Lane Configurations tt Ideal Flani{�phlal) 1900 1900 ,190b .1900 ` 1900 190b x'1900 ;1900„ ;,t%19Q0 1900; 190Q 190.0 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 w '11 ,1" 0 1 00 Fane UEiI",Factor 1.00 0.9100. 1.00 0.89 1 00 1.0 00 0.85 1.00 1.0905 I✓It Iroteced O*95 T,q:Q.M. Q:.95x x;00 00 �,, 0 95; 1 ,00 C10 Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1639 1719 1611 1719 3438 1538 1719 3438 1538 SlatdeF Flow(perm) 2+73 1639„ ,1 9' 1611 577.. 3 = «$. 00. 1:00 1538 653 3438 1538 55 Vo me(vph:),... ,;,T?5 10 25 14 20 15 15 lu 45 5 5 90 a , Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 6'M 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92' 0.92 0.92 1:.6 27 1:58 696 16 Lane Group Flow(vph) 82 43 0 158 82 0 49 614 98 16 696 16 Heav V ohicles /a 5 ° Perm a 0/6" Turn Perm ° Perm Perm Type ( ) Perm ° 5% Perm 55h % ote ted Ph2 ases Pe . .. ,. .. . . . m P Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 8 8 Grderi 'G 42:0, 42x0. 420 42 0 $ 0 0 500 550 0.0 50.0' 50:0 5d:0 Actuated,' (" ) Effective Green, g (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 50.0 50. 50:0 50.0 50.0 Actuated;p/C Ratio ,; 0;:42 0.42 0`;42 0:42 ` ; 0'.50 0 50,;: 0:50 0 50; 0.50 0:50 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.,0: 4.0 4 6 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp`Cap.(uph} ; 535 6$8 , 554 `', .677 289 1719 "' 769, . 327 1719 769 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.05 0,18 c0,20 u/s` 2Iio Perm 0.06 c012 0>0$ 0 06 '! 0,02 0.01 v/c Ratio y 0.15 0.06 0.29 0.12 0.17 0.36 0.13 0.05 0.40 0.02 Urilfc►r pela ` d1 18.0`; 17x3, 19 1 17 7 1347, '15,2 13 4 ;, 12.8', 15:7 ' 12:6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.07 1.33 Irierer{terrt'I Delay, d2 0;6 0 2 - 1 3 0 4 1'3' 0 6 v 0 3 ': 0;3;, 0:7 ;' 0.0 Delay(s) 18,6 17.4 20.4 18.1 14.9 15.8 13.7 14.9 17.5 16.8 C evotfcff Service. B C B: B B B Approach Delay(s) 18.2 19.6 155 17.4 Approach LQS B HCM:AV ,eB g sw B, rZ HCM Vo urmeeto CapaciCbritro Dtylaatio `; 0 35 HCM Le�reor l-of Service Cycleerigth .(s) .. 1,00;0., Sum.of lost time(s) 8 0' Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU f Service A c°? Critical Lane:GrohtP<. „To. , . Level o Baseline Synchro 5 Report Pagel FELSBUENGL-FF51 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lGeneral Information Site Information Analyst LED Intersection I Wa access& US 40 Agency/Co. FHU Jurisdiction Date Performed 1012102 Analysis Year 2025 Total Analysis Time Period AM peak Project Description Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: lWaAccess North/South Street: US40- Intersection Orientation: North-South IStud y Period JtEs .�O.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 40 425 0 0 1035 40 Peak-Hour Factor, PHIF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 43 1 461 1 0 0 1124 1 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- 0 -- Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T, R upstream Signal PMinor Street Westbound Eastbound ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 40 0 60 Peak-Hour Factor, PHIF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 43 0 65 U Percent Heavy Vehicles T—+ 0 0 5 0 5 Percent Grade(%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v(vph) 43 43 65, C (m) (vph) 607 270 566 VIC 0.07 0.16 0.11 95% queue length 0.23 0.56 0.39 Control Delay 11.4 20.8 12.2 LOS B C Approach Delay 15.6 Lpproach LOS C Rights Reserved Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file:HC:\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Lyle\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2k3F.tmp 9/16/2004 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY lGeneral Information Site Information Analyst LED Intersection I We access& US 40 Agency/Co. FHU Jurisdiction Date Performed 1012102 Analysis Year 2025 Total Analysis Time Period PM peak Project Description Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: lWaAccess iNorth/South Street: US 40 Intersection Orientation: North-South IStud y Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 125 1445 0 0 825 90 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 135 1 1570 1 0 0 1 896 1 97 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal I I 1 1 1 'Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 90 0 110 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 0 1 0 97 0 —1 119 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 1 0 —5 0 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration T- L R7 Delay,Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R ■ v(vph) 135 97 119 C (m) (vph) 689 247 595 v/c 0.20 0.39 0.20 95% queue length 0.72 1.77 0.74 Control Delay 11.5 28.7 12.6 LOS B D B Approach Delay 19.8 rpproach LOS -- C Rights Reserved Copyright 012003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file:HC:,\Documents%20and%2OSettings\Lyle\Local%2OSettings\Temp\u2k42.tmp 9/16/2004 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total AM Peak Hour 13: 1 Wa access & US 44 PA 1 Wa Access --.* * t '4.:, r�r�,wu. kYW R',&"�rjl`u I"aa'! ",� W'r? •4a"ri` ti M' ,:+ °m„ d y.�. vb °.+ ��<�;i a >: Lane Configurations ' tt t+ r Ideal Flom(vphp�)? 1�QQ 1Q0 19.00 " 1:9t0''vK1;900 19001 g Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ►:anelltdk�4FactorJ 'k`." 1'001 954 " Frt 1.00 0.85 1,00 1.00 11.00 0 85 CrProcos$ i}>r., 0;91 005" v 1+f0 ,�� OnM °+tb0 ' 1583- Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3539 1583 la dQF Flow(perm) w " 0 95 S 1 00 03 r 1;001 kQ10w,..; 1 OQ 0 1583 437 3539 3539 1583 ' 4C! 60 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow(vph) 43 65 43 462 1125 43 eerm l'uProtected Phases 4 Prm PPerm i esrP J 4 Permitted Phaesr 4:' 2 y 2 66J Actuated Green, G (s) 12,0 12.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 Actuated l7ctiVererr, s 12:.b 12:0 $C?:0 17 8 g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 C(earance�Tlme,s} r Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 190 350 2831 2831 1266 0'13a;602 v/s Ratio Perm c0.04 0.10 0.03 0 0 0, 4 Q xI2 0:16 d+40 " ;0 03 Uniform Delay, d1 39.7 40.4 2.2 2.3 2.9 2.1 F?rpgrs►ontor 1 0 0 1'00 4^rr Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 4.8 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.0 41;8 Level of Service D D. B B A A qar:}%}7(�.,1pj,w�+✓s�^^v�'r;^!��-r1,"fP S 5 F x � n � y y Approach LOS D B A INo �" w ^' , c' s HCM Average Control Delay 7.9 HCM Level of Service A uma ate Cl �city ratio HC 0 39 Vol y Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 I"nterecticSnaCpct#y U'tilizatiion 41 8°fo ICU'Le�rl ofAService G� A :.... c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 1 FELSBUENGL-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total PM Peak Hour 13: 1 Wa access & US 40 PA 1 Wa Access Lane Configurations . . J 00,; x1900;.,'`1"900 1 Qb 1900 1900 c Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,.,.:.' : s„a.: Vit,,..?-, Lane.U'(tl.�. .acta .� �. .1.0.0,' 0.95: 0.,9:5'.;;' ?��' 00 t, � �,, Frt 1.60 0.85 1,00 1.,00 1.00 0'.85 "0 6 Satd. Flow(prof) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3539 1583 F�t:;Perm�tte�l, .'., 0 9.5.,. ..1;:Q0 0:3'f 1",00 „ 1 AO � 9 Oa �;�^ 'f ,� .�v t "• Said Flow perm) 1770Y ' 1583 568 3539 3539 1583 Ublume, 25.., Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1...36 9,7 k 9$ 3 S Lane Group Flow(vph) " 87 120 136 1571 897 98 TWrnTpe" Perm: Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 p, ftTllttel.`F?taSeS :4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 12.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0 I✓fctiue Gr`eri;g{s) 12 Q, ' '10 8t70 $0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Cl�ardn'ce T�m:e, s s :,; 4:0 �, A•4 4;0 �'4 0 4 C1 ,4 4 '�` � :,,a.' � � I::- Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 190 454 2831 2831 1266 z •r,.,.,.,,. `+'. .,,.. , ,.:, <;'rs:>;': 'eta:-,.s: ''. u 0. -0.25:' 1 .7' v/s Ratio Perm c0.08 0.24 0.06 r 0 83 0'3Q` 0.55 0:32 0 48 4, Uniform Delay, d1 40.7 41.9 2.6 3.6 2.7 2.1 Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 14.9 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 „ .Qa ., .,.h z. ,.. , .• , ,;, 56. . , .. .1 5. 1'0 Level of Service D E A A A A Y . 4? 4 W'✓A'.; j y 1 ,b Approach LOS D A- A HCM Average Control Delay 4.6 HCM Level of Service A MCM Valurne to;Ca acs ratio' 5.6 ,, Cycle Length s 100 0 ,y" g ( } Sum of lost time (s) 8 0 Inter ection}Capaol#y Uft(Fzatiori 54 9% ICU,Level of Service , r Ar; c Critical Lane Group Baseline Synehro 5 Report Page 1 FELSBUENGL-FF51 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LED Intersection Rendezvous Road/FVP AgencyjCo. FHU Jurisdiction Date Performed 41512001 Analysis Year 2025 Analysis Time Period 2025 Total AM peak hour Project Description Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: Rendezvous Road North/South Street: Fraser Valley Pkwy Intersection Orientation: East-West IStud y Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume(veh/h) 70 440 205 15 180 60 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 70 440 205 15 180 60 (veh1h) Proportion of heavy 2 vehicles, PHV 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes I 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 .10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 75 110 10 85 195 25 Peak-hour factor, PHIF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 75 110 10 85 195 25 (veh/h) Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 2 2 I I I Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TRIL TR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR L TR Volume, v(vph) 70 15 75 120 85 220 Capacity, cm (vph) 1327 940 46 253 137 1 239 Vic ratio 0.05 0.02 1.63 0.47 0.62 0.92 Queue length (95%) 0.17 0.05 7.42 2.37 3.26 7.97 Control Delay(s/veh) 7.9_. 1 8.9 503.6 31.4 66.8 83.2 LOS A A F D F F pproach delay 213.0 78.6 I(s/veh) pproach LOS F F HC82000TM Copyright(D 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst LED Intersection Rendezvous Road I FVP A ency/Co. HU Jurisdiction Date Performed 4/5/2001 Analysis Year 2025 0, Analysis Time Period 2025 Total PM peak hour Project Description Rendezvous TIA East/West Street: Rendezvous Road INorth/South Street: Fraser Valley Pkw Intersection Orientation: East-West IStud y Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 40 310 125 20 500 180 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 40 310 125 20 500 180 (veh/h) I Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 I -- I -- 2 I Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes I 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR 22sstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h) 230 265 25 150 190 75 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate 230 265 25 150 190 75 (veh/h) I I Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHV 2 2 2 2 2 I Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TP L TR Tolume, v(vph) 40 20 230 290 150 265 Capacity, cm(vph) 912 1125 0 192 0 229 /c ratio 0.04 0.02 1.51 1.16 ueue length (95%) 0.14 0.05 18.22 12.47 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 8.3 299.69 153.2 LOS A A F F F F Approach delay (s/veh) Approach LOS HCS2000TM Copyright C 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total AM Peak Hour 5: Rendezvous Road & US 40 PA Ma POIN Mm Lane Configurations ..._.. `I,. Ideal Flew 1r h t 1900, 19 0 '�i 90QF1900�Y 1900 1, 00 18 Q 19AQ;r;f fiQO' ;19Q(tCIQ` ('90b Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 La e Ufa .F t ac ar, r •,. . , . Q 1 00, (� 1 Firt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1 OQ 0 85 f /'��i l Q 9 1 N a 1 Q�1 Q1MJ 1,Q� �V I d�.:. 00 Vv�l ryi t � 4QtY r.'.iJ V Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1538 1719 1810 11538 1719 3438 1538 1719 3438 1538 Said. Flow(perm) 1331 1810 1538 1338 1810 1538., 332 3438 1538 1014 3438 1538 Sty ':^, r: V .,:v. 2 5' .2<, .�! 70. 1f , „`�:�<,, .,....�,::..•.,,.:_•..-:,.,,..:,w:...*:.., ',1�Oa-..,, .�11„5� �s�;�90�u•, X55', > 40'" 640�.,.;�~..''t'-�'p 30 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 . ,.. , , Lane Group Flow(vph) 261 27 293 179 33 109 125 315 60 43 696 120 '"I eiaU '� Ip+IfS..J /'�O " �,IOa ; , r 6 � rO r� 0 t O �'� '^.'f 0 } ', �"�, ' '"•t 1 0�� r✓3 �» ... Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm ProteGtedkPhasgs '7' '4 3 8 5' 2 -6 ` Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 „0 A tuafied re n; G (s)' 42`p 26ztQ . 0 ";32'0 C 20 0 50 0 36 f�' ''. 35x0 40 0.. Effective Green, g (s) 42.0 26.0 26.0 32.0 20.0 20.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 30.0 30.0 Atuafied /YC Rtria °>#. OMx2u 0 26,'.r `0 a, 03 0 2¢ 00 0 50`' 0, 6., Or35Q Clearance Time (s) 40 40 4.0 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Lane Grp Ce : .v h 529 ;4yr � r0 X74 fi 362 308 r 38$' x;125&,r'. 0 ) X46 ix. 554 476 r1h :011, . 00.32 0.0 v/s Ratio Prot c0 07 0.01 0.05 0.02 c0 05 0 09 0.01 c0 2Q s`Ratio Pecm ,,,, 00 c019, q..;i18 `; 0 07 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.06 0.73 0.38 0.09 0 35 0 32 0.25 0.11 0.09 0.68 0.26 2'1`3 13°S nAa r ; 1 X52 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.58 0.59 0.93 0.88 1.04 Increrrkenti Dela}, d2 ,LL ,; } ".0" ;a Q4 s, �� 'r,u 2 3 0 5 3 Delay(s) 22.9 28.0 45.1 29.0 33, 3 1 37.6 $4 13.6 12.9 17.4 30.6 28.9 L�l'�.I,+S�f§§�{�,r��`{ero ` r t:W�k Y^�,,, t �('�i,w , ,fir '�1 a, �,±/S r „�x B '•<17F §Bt Y �^ arr i�F'�`y fii��'�" Approach Delay(s) 34.3 32.3 12.2 varµx7�„5}'2t �^ok .r mall !1 A v ..4 x2`459. Y CI1/1 Area e Cbritrol Quid s r 11{{ Of S�'r�/�ce HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Cycle f"egtfi'( )° ^, , q0 4x>f. Sum of lost fim (s) 12 0, 4r ; Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.3% ICU Level of Service A Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 3 FELSBUENGL-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total PM Peak Hour 5. Rendezvous Road & US 40 PA Ma ssRL. . .•..a.,... w ane Configurations t w , „ Ideal Flow(vphpl) :, .. 1$00 r 19Q0< ; .o�" : p° � ? � or � 3oi,� 19ad nr 1900; t dao X00 1+900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4A 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 lean UtiL ;.:,. e Factor 1•.0 00 1".00 1.00- 1"Od: 51Y ' OQ� f 9s�00 �1�00 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 �0 Frfi 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt'Pr,�tected 9 1 90; WQx., : ,, � O�ti ,a°°eee»;1t90� �Yaf' 3 a l OOr 00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1538 1719 1810 1538 1719 3438 1538 1719 3438 1538 �:,.�0 , 1,,QQ� Satd. Flow(perm) 1331 1810 1538 1319 1810 1538 298 3438 1538 457 3438 1538 42C.:F 501Q Peak hour factor, P HF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0'.92 0.92 Rd flow' v 'ii ' 234 4 0` :,,;,,>,,,,,� � , (pp. ) ( p F ,' 3 ' .,,$",°. �Q .:4 F `�' 3 `I.S.'.:�, 7' `` 79� 130, `t?4I 337 Lane Grou Flow v h) 234 43 250 120 33 54 391 1076 179 130 641 337 .,4r tib. 'M1'i VY�1N',,,�5:`. �4 t: .•'�'�tt:"�. "!:'%' ':y"" `"/• U ,:a;. .,0.. G,. tea'V^„ `�.1 'C;.,E'. b Y, •:4'.:,`. i"'. Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protr cfed F?iiases s �, ..l r• a�,�, b i`7 . .. n.'�� -r Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Actuated'G'reeh, G (s) :33:0`, 23:0 23.bb t ' 0 6 0 } .sr::,'°z` 45 0: 4r SCJ 25.0 ; 25,0 r_..�, .. Effective Green, g (s) 33.0 23.0 23.0 22.0 16.0 16.0 59.0 45.0 45.0 35.0 25.0 25.0 ActuOted.`g/G'Ratio 0;33 Q 23 0 3,t O r, b f61 r a�16 ::'z .59 0 4 r' 0 4' 0 35 Q26 0 25 Clearance Time (s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 4.0 Lane Gl :Cap(Yph) 4Q'. 416 354 '.. 9 " °"? .8eQ, 3,85. v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.02 0.02 0,02 c0.19 0.31 0.05 0.19 11;,' cOz2 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.10 0.71 0.38 0.11 0.22 0.65 0.76 0.26 0.45 0.75 0.88 Uniforrh belay, 01 6 0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 h P:,,mj,.,,�•,a„s � .81 g 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.41 0.32 1.10 0.54 0.19 xA, x+.'Y .h• incre ental D la ., - v m. e ,,d2 3' Vie' A. Y .. `' { . . .< � 6. 37.0 j 36.7:,. �'$6 Y( },......,... 8 Dela s 30 5 30.9 4 7 Level ofi Service: ' . ""W" _e' r 10 fl r X£6 A2 29 9✓ 24 1 28.9C :. Approach Delay(s) 38.2 37.4 12.0 26.3 r .,. .y.,,. Apt,Qf�C.+11 �41'.::.: r rel b d5 )T' 4 i. r. `>..G n �.,:,:,rxh'•,�w $ Yu 1,a dz`- 4,aiz` f t': +..,..:"„ ,r va ", k,k,.,.+. d "V./� "„7 1 n s ctto'rmrrfiar} HGM Average.Control Delc �«�z . erv� NCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Intersection Capacity acity Utilization 69.0% aa ICU Level of Service B l ✓ !'Crtfiica1. n e, ,V 1 iS j:,';dy„r xbv4 zr.�.. .,..1..'f."r) i+i✓• t�. Ft a,k,1,'}s °i,a : .4`1 s aup,t Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 3 FELSBUENGL-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total AM Peak Hour 17: King's Crossing Road & US 40 PA 1Wa Lane Configurations urations tdea(F(o :(vphPl)<Y,,.:° „ Os 1'90Q 1900a 1O0'� 190 900 ' DNAa0� Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 atie;tJ"t"iln Fector 1x00' ' 1.9.0r'. 1;1 A0 ' u,r , , ",Y,. x ,'.},• 'M §1 b0 a0 951 0 t'0 0 95r 0•Q Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 : Satd Flow(prot) 1719' "1810 1538 1676 1719 3438 1538 1719 3438 1538 Ox1W2"` 10 Satd Flow(perm) 1338 1810 1538 1594 216 3438 1538' 8711 3438 1f538 °. ,+,., ,., y,.' .'u., ....I. .. . Y .,.�... .....^� � �0. 5. ,,...9'60 �, .1 z , Peak-hour factor, PHF 0,92 0.92 0.92 „ ,..,., 0.92 0.92 092 092 092 092 092 092 092 8� d 3 s 1 s.1.r: 'y ;5 1158' 2 Lane Group Flow(vph) 22 5 174 0 27 0 82 473 11 5 1158 27 1;"§ Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Ph Permitted Phases 4 6 a 2 ". 8 T Effective Green, g (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 5�,��., 48 . .... 4 0 68 0 5t3 0 y 53.0 59.0 48 0 48.0 ,. " �w 4.0 Atuti1G Fatior ,LL;, 024 Q 24 0;24 24 :"OZ& i 5 3 159FG)4;8 C)A$ Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 � . i ?, aP( ph)u 32 434 369.., :383" :' u8 ,&� 'r x'81'5" 67 16.505Y r' 738`. v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0 00 cO3 r r ' r 1 G ftr { d t ns 4 t?� F v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.47 0.07 0.21 0.26 0.01 0.01 0.70 0.04 Ury�fgrrpely,x 29 4 29'Q 32:6 w 29'4 . 7; �� i �tx3 �4 � 4 r 1l3 8 ,, Progression Factor 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 0.45 0.06 .,r.,. Ir�,cretaer ta[... ,tali, d2, g 0.4 0:0 4:3 0 4 . , , �<<?,:<'Ar " ` x � � ��-� <w j�f ��Ux Dewy(s) 29.8. 29.0 36.8 29.7 11.0 13.2 11.2., 3.9 "11.4 0.9 f✓e n4'., Cr rl : C' .,.ID ,._ 297 12.8 Approach Delay(s) 35.9 Ap`proacLOS r Da 3 p ,u ,.f N ...... .. .. ,. IX v M1 , ...z .,N,�••X NCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 55 � Le el•of POO 9ost ICU Levune .... ,, p el of Service A cntersection Ca acitp r� ;Cttcal Lane Gr yu Tsti Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 4 FELSBUENGL-FF51 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2025 Total PM Peak Hour 17: King's Crossing Road & US 40 PA Ma -b- 4- t 1 ,:. ON Lane Configurations t Iclgal Fi�yu(Ypfp�,)„ 4190Q;t 1900 „19Q04 990q 9900 11,900 1900 t''`19QO R 1°9EJOy: 19042 'a1 q0 'r190Q Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 :+ ,; Lane Utal .Factor �1 00 1 00,, ,1 00 1 00 .1 00 •0 95� 1 00 1 000 95�f 1,OQ Frt 1 00 1.00 0.85 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0 85 ;, Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1538 1668 1719 3438 1538 171^9 3438 1538 -....:; •-yr;."'.`F.u':"zC,a.............. v,�.. „.5.. ., ,'r'.; .,.':..a „4':7r;-.:S .. :;,. .a' ...(&;-r'irvw ..�;C,v ...,�,:, ;'vs '•?:::',. .,.�.,mv,_ y.,.�,... Flt:l?�!:..,itf�d,�r°;>w,y>u; 0 �O(� ,..�L�,�zt>~ ,.: •. r s(?i92 . 0 1��.;,.,x'C,4JtG0. . F>1 �3Q �:.Qry1,b�, '1{#0.0 , 1QA Satd. Flow(perm) 1326 1810 1538 1562 270 3438 15348 175 3438 1538 ,J. . Y'• r, .'.tee ,. r+:.x,n, V o urYt�(yp�) I <. 25 Peak hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.62 0.9i 0.92 0 92 0 92 0'.k 16,, 250 1641 Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 5 174 0 37 0 250 1641 33 11 967 27 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm rotectectPhase ,: 4 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 . :$ 2 2'. . 6,.. 6 Acilatd% eer� (sjG 22 0: ;:17 2 :U . °0 , Q 0..:-. t;4 ;O.t.1 ri42,0 Effective Green,g (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 70.0 60.0 60.0 48.0 42.0 42.0 Aptuated OIC atd t 0 22•`,° % s la o a� > Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0" 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane:Gr -.Ca , v •.�_. 92 9$� r °� S 37 " 06� 923 `1��7;,.•1444 t 6 5 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.1.1 � c0.4$ 0.00 0.28 j :x✓,;+5 5�r A.Y^" 4"' f z 1' t "'", 1 J1'1" A', .t,. 'Y• + � � " h .•...: Yt 9 „_ .fsL ' .r.5.a.s txe',}'l °' ��02 VIc Ratio 0.17 0.01 0.51 0.11 0.47 0.80 0.04 0.06 0.67 0.04 U,iiifgim Defy d I 36 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 0.37 0.03 a3 1 t^; k ':r irr`crem frtal e(�, d� +� .gip, •1.x2 01 � t �: :.,_ Delay(s) 32.8 30.6 39.8 31.8 13.1 18.6 8.26.1 10.7 " 0.7 rr t c a Level Ctf Service.,, t 'b ;+.. ^�� <' ,S " as D i F.•, s �6�'t p t E � k p �� i A``+ z�r B �� t ....,::F- .,..,,.,...s_ wY.h+t.snr•.. , ..., ,.:,.,.«„ -..: .'n,a....1.. ,. ...:.,; „_.,.m.. .:..,,, ; .. Approach Delay(s) 38.1 31.8 17.7 10.3 Appro �Pi La7 +� ,3'Yri.y1*" t „ _ y^4 gQ S P": :+;6, ✓7;;;,li tf w t B a3 ,.„t.t,.....aa 'k,RrR,+"e. Nh w,RS,.n+, S d. ... .•' ;r:';':. .p.M', r' ....�fi1.t'.+..... ..„'.: ..,,..,:t ,,:,. ., 1M:,, HCM Aveag Gti#io,�NQ (a} 17 0 HCMILe�rel 146M Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Cyc[ebLi5rlgtFi (s„ 100;0 y SUtn b lost trme'(s) X20, ; Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0% ICU Level of Service B Baseline Synchro 5 Report Page 4 FELSBUENGL-FF51 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX C US HIGHWAY 40 PROGRESSION DIAGRAMS FELSBURU CHOLT & ULLEVIG Appendix Time-Space Diagram .US 40 AM Peak Progression Chart-2025 Arterial and Link-Link Bandwidths, Maximum Green Times No lWa Signal Main Street Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Offset III IIIII I it lilt IIIII I It is I Jill]I it IIIIIIII I it I It IIII I I 1111111110111111411111]lilt I lilt IIIII IIIIIIII III lilt US 40 @ CR 804 B Link Ba Os NW trial Band 34 s 84 US 40 SE Ll and 39 E Arteria and 3 @ Safeway/CommunitRJ NW ink and 35 s N Arterial' nd 4 s 96 US 40 @ 14E Access N \\ / US 40 8Link Ba 34 s \/S B Aeerial Band 34 s 4s @ Rendezvous Road Link B F; Os NB rial Band 34 s 40 Link US 40 + 77� 77777N @ 12E Access US 40 A A @ I Wa access US 40 + SB Link Band N4,S/////\ SBArt�.Oa"nd s @ King's Crossing Rol& NB Link Ba 5 NB ter Band 34 83 US 40M,I Link B 6s SB rial Band 3 V 1: @ E. Midtown DriveNB ink an s N A I an 4s 99 US 40 + Y\/SB Li B nd 7 B rte d @ Vasquez Road 19 Baseline K:k04086\updated submifta119.04 2025 Total AMprog.sy6 Time-Space Diagram -US 40 AM Peak Progression Chart-2025 Arterial and Link-Link Bandwidths, Maximum Green Times With lWal Signal Main Street Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Offset It 111 it it I till I it lit I nil IIIIII it I It till III I It I I III 1111111111111[1111111111 It I I I Iml till]III III US 40 @ CR 804 Link d" s W e al Band 32 s 87 US 40 EB and 36 Arteriaand 32 @ 3Wc Access Mmm" 97 1 mrl� N ink and 32 Arterial nd s US 40 @ 14E Access 41 US 40 + Link 34s S erial Band 32 s @ Rendezvous Road 4 L 1,1, N* k B 32s N erial Band 32 s 38 US 40 + @ 12E Access IV US 40 SB ink and 32\\s Arterial Sand S @ 1 W access 8i ink d 41 N rteri L 13 US 40 B Link Ban s SB Ar ial nd s @ King's Crossing Roat NB Link B NB rtes and 3 81 US 40 + Link 9 S S s @ E. Midtown Drive V NB ink an A I a 32 s 0 L.\ s \//NE B US 40 NUNN SB L' B d 7 �B rteri I nd @ Vasquez Road 8 17 Baseline K:\04086\updated submiftal\9.04 2025 Total AMprogx.sy6 Time-Space Diagram -US 40 PM Peak Progression Chart-2025 Arterial and Link-Link Bandwidths, Maximum Green Times No lWa Signal Main Street Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Offset IIIIIIII it 11111111111 till 11 it I IIII 111m I it it I till-1-1-1-11 It-1-1 oil till III IIIII I IIIII IIIIIII I it I 11111111 III It III I I IIIIII 11111 It US 40 @ CR 804 8 WB j n dV5 Art 1 Ba 2 s 14 US 40 ink B n s EB r i Ba d26s @ 3Wc Access Link an 5 s Ar rial Ban 25 s 83 US 40 @ 14E Access 8 US 40 8 SB Link --d. 6 - - -rt. is an, 26 s @ Rendezvous Road 79 NB Li and s Art I B 5 S US 40 @ 12E Access 8 US 40 @ lWa access US 40 SB -, k,B�nd -10 s S Arterial Band 2 @ King's Crossing Ro.-4] Lir d 46 s rterial and 17 US 40 Lin n s r B 6 83 US 40 ts ' 762% S tri d 26 s\ @ B r r and 2 L! Ff S 69 Baseline K:1040861updated submittal19.04 2025 Total PMprog.sy6 Time-Space Diagram -US 40 PM Peak Progression Chart-2025 Arterial and Link-Link Bandwidths, Maximum Green Times With lWa Signal Main Street Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Offset It is 11111111111111 it 1111111 till it 1111iii I it till 111111111111111110 111111111111111 till If till it till oil III$)If US 40 @ CR 804 < 14 WB n 3 Ar ri B 2 s US 40 ink B n S EB r al B d 26 s @ Safeway/Communi Link an 45s Aerial Ba 25s 81 US 40 @ 14E Access 8 US 40 8SB Lin 6 ria a. 26 s @ Rendezvous Road NB Ll and s Art 'al B s 78 US 40 7/7 @ 12E Access US 40 + VV Link and I�s SO/Ar a"IB 26 s\// @ lWa access 4 B t [al Ban s 3 S �Lin Bad A s d 4A US 40 + in d 44 s rt rial Ba 2 @ King's Crossing Rof Li d 46 s tenial n IZAA 20 US 40 N+ S i s r * B 6 @ 4 n ffBrXind�j s 83 -1 US 40 F+ S k s nd 26 69 Baseline K:1040861updated submitta119.04 2025 Total PMprogx.sy6 ............A JV NO I FoI10 6,anf_\ June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 Town of Fraser C/o Russell Pennington Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 80447 Re: Preliminary Plan-Engineering Response GRAND PARK—THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS Dear Russell: This response letter presents our engineering responses to the engineering comments received from our 70%plan issue on April 27th, 2021.The plan changes discussed herein will be made in our final engineering plan submission,whose date is still to be determined. COMMENTS American Willow Drive ROW Based on the plans, American Willow Drive is proposed to connect to Hwy 40. A connection to a state highway will result in American Willow Drive being classified as a collector street with a minimum required ROW width of 60 feet.The right-of-way should be dedicated to the Town at this time as part of this project. TKE(6/10/21): We understand.The site plan is being revised to changes American Willow to a 60'ROW. The roadway design does not change, and the current building locations meet required setbacks. Old Victory Road The right of way for Old Victory Road between Mountain Willow Drive and the intersection at Kings Crossing Road is required to be dedicated to the Town of Fraser as part of this project. It shall also be constructed and paved with Filing 1. The right of way dedication shall be included as part of this project and the roadway construction plans shall be included within the construction plans for this project. TKE (6/10/21): Per Grand Park, they will construct, pave and dedicate most of Old Victory Road discussed, but the segrnent between Mountain Willow Drive and out subdivision road will not be paved or dedicated until this final phase of this project is complete. Grand Park intends to use the unpaved section as the access and staging area for the future development area adjacent to it, which will be completed later. Offsite Utilities With this development,the Town's downstream collection system capacity will exceed the Town's design criteria.As part of this project,a new sewer crossing of US 40 shall be designed and constructed with Filing 1. The construction plans for the sewer line shall be included in the construction plans for this project. Once constructed, the Grand Park subdivision shall be disconnected from the Forest Meadows sewer system and will connect onto this new US 40 crossing. GRAND PARK (6/10/21)-, Grand Park understands that stretch of sewer could be nearing the 50% full capacty trigger and will upgrade the line when actual observation confirms the pipe is 50% Nil, as is industry standard care of practice, Stormwater There are numerous comments and questions from the town's engineering consultant regarding stormwater. TKE (6/10/21).,See below. Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 2 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 Cozens Ditch A letter from USACE is required that approves the realignment of Cozen's Ditch prior to construction plan approval. TKE (6/10/21): In progress by Grand Park. TK.E_DRAINAGE NOT,ES.T'O_REVIEWER-(§LkQI4).a The revised 90% Final TKE report now replaces the Phelps plan entirely. Please review the revised report. The wetlands cells are no longer utilized for all Willows' filing, existing and proposed. Requirements for detention and water quality are addressed with the proposed on-site ponds. This submittal is a 90%set intended to address and respond to the preliminary plan engineering review comments.The level of detail in the drainage report,calculations and pond detailing is not intended to be final yet. Please review this set for general concurrence with the drainage philosophy and intent,as you would for any preliminary plan review.The following list are the remaining issues to be addressed with the 100%final drainage report: • Culvert calculations for all proposed and existing storm. • Riprap,calculations • Pond trickle channel flowlines and specifications Drainage Report Text 1. On Page 3 in the Introduction, it states that this report is an addendum to the 2015 Phelps drainage report. Upon reviewing the provided 2015 Phelps report(begins on Page 50)and Drainage Map(see Page 144), there are significant differences between the current drainage plan and the 2015 Phelps report, so instead, this report should be considered an update to the Phelps report to document the currently planned improvements. To avoid confusion, only provide excerpts/calculations from the Phelps report that are still relevant and can be used to support the current design. Highlight the relevant information. TKE (6/10/21): The revised final TKE report now replaces the Phelps plan entirely. Please review the revised report. 2. The construction plans (and looking at Google Earth) indicate that a portion of the development has already been constructed,whereas the Drainage Plan indicates that all of the drainage improvements are proposed. This is confusing. The report should clearly discuss the existing conditions and what improvements have already been constructed per the 2015 Phelps drainage report design. Also, provide an explanation of how the current proposed drainage plan is different than what was proposed by the 2015 Phelps drainage plan. TKE (6/10/21): Please review the revised report. 3.What is also not clear is whether the improvements that have already been constructed have adequate capacity or not since the design flows may have changed since the 2015 Phelps report was completed and the size of the constructed improvements may not match the 2015 Phelps report in some locations.The current TKE drainage report must be updated to document the as-built conditions and remaining proposed improvements, including a hydraulic analysis for the entire storm sewer system. TKE(6/10/21): Please review the revised report. 4.At the top of Page 4, it states that this development is located within the Carrol & Lange drainage Basin H (see Drainage Map on Page 112) and will be combined with runoff from the No Name channel and directed to DP7 located adjacent to Old Victory Road north of the Cozens Meadow detention pond. Per both the 2015 Phelps report and this current TKE drainage report, this development is now proposed to Z Fraser—GPVVAResponse Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page June 10, Z021 ]N: 19008 be routed to the existing wetlands pond to the east, not to the north. Revise this statement to describe the current plan. TKE (6/10/21): Please review the revised repo/t. 5. On Page 5, for Design Point 4, it states that the relocated Cozen's Ditch will bypass the two amenity ponds, but the Drainage Map shows that they are planned to be routed through these ponds. Clarify the intent. |fneeded, show how the Ditch will berouted around these ponds. TKE (6/10/21):The ditch is not routed through the ponds as previously stated. 6. On Page 5,for Design Point 1A,the proposed developed flow of 189 cfs appears to be a typo and should be18.9ds. Fix asneeded. TKE (6J10/21): Corrected. 7. On Page 5, discuss runoff to Design Point 2 and how the flow is combined with flow at Design Point 3, then isrouted tmDesign Point Q. TKE (8/10/21): Please review the revised report. 8. OnPage 5, discuss runoff toDesign Points 6and 7and how the flow iscombined with flow atDesign Point 4. TKE (6/10/21): Please review-the revised report. 9. On Page S+ discuss the runoff to Design Point 1 S and how the flow is routed to Design Point POA-B. TKE (6/10/21): Please review the revised report. 10. On Page 5, discuss how the runoff from the southeast will be routed in a swale to Relocated Cozen's Ditch. TKE (6/10/21): Please review the revised report. 11. In the report, at Design Point PDA-Sa diversion structure is proposed tosplit flow tn Cuzen's Ditch (Le, allowable irrigation flow) and developed flows to the existing wetlands pond. The capacity of the existing ditch to the existing wetlands pond is planned to be determined based on a survey and used to determine the split flows. Instead, the required split flow must be based on the allowable irrigation flow and the developed flow that must be routed to and detained by the existing wetlands pond, not the existing ditch capacity. If the existing ditch does not have adequate capacity, either it must be regraded to provide the required capacity or detention must be provided to reduce the flow. TKE (6/10/21): Please review the revised report. 12. Per the Carroll& Lange Overall Offsite Detention Exhibit for Existing Wetlands Pond dated March 2008 provided on Page 124, the existing wetlands pond was intended to provide detention for the 100-year storm event at a depth of 4.3 inches and with a storage volume of 1.5 AF.Stormwater quality was planned to be treated prior to entering the wetlands.Therefore, provide onsite water quality treatment. TKE (6J10/21): The wetlands cells are no longer utilized-for the Willows. 13. On Page 5 for Design Point 1 A, it states that this is the only location where developed flow is higher than the Phelps 2016 flow, but per the HEC-HMS Flow Results comparison table on Page 6,the developed flow is also higher at Design Points 1 S, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and PDAScompared tothe DEV-2020 flows that were intended "to match Phe|ps" This isanindication that the proposed percent imperviousness and development density has increased compared to what was intended. To reduce 100-year peak flows to the historic condition prior to discharge to the Fraser River,the following must occur: a. Evaluate and provide additional detention storage asneeded. 'TKE (6/20/21): Provided. Fraser—GPVVAResponse Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page June 10, Z021 ]N: 19008 b. Along with this evaluation, the existing outlet (weir and culvert across Hwy. 40\ for the existing wetlands pond must be evaluated to verify its capacity and that it functions adequately. TKE (6/80/21): Nolonger required. All detention and water quality is either detained or over-treated/over-detained on-site. c. All developed, future developments, and undeveloped areas that are tributary to the existing wetlands pond must be included in the evaluation, including The Willows,Town Center at Grand Park and Old Victory Road and Grand Park Drive Improvements. TKE (6/10/21): The wetlands cells are nolonger utilized for the Willows. d. Provide freeboard asoriginally proposed for the pond. T&Ef6/10/21t "The wetlands cells are nolonger utilized for the Willows. e.The existing wetlands pond was constructed inabout 2O05.A field survey must beprovided toverify that the designed storage volume (1.5 AF per Page 124) is still available and that the pond has not significantly silted in. If it hos silted in, maintenance must be provided to bring this pond into compliance prior tothe construction ofthe Willows Apartment development. TKE (6y10/21), The wetlands cells are nolonger utilized for the Willows. 14. On Page 6, clarify how the DEV'2O2Oflows were determined and how they are different from the Phelps 2Q1Gflows. TKE /6/1.0/21\; DEV-2020|s no longer used.The new report stands on its own,for all of the Willows. 15. On Page 6 in the flow summary table, make sure all "labels" are shown on the Drainage Plan, such as "sauthpnnd", °AVVD" , Clubhuuse", etc. TKE (6/20/21):Completed. 16. Two amenity ponds are proposed for this development. Since these ponds are proposing to permanently store water, they must be approved by the State Engineers Office since they will not meet the requirements of Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 37-92-602(8) that requires all storrnwater for the 5 and 100-year storm events to be released within a maximum time period, Provide documentation that these amenity ponds have been approved bvthe State. GRAND PARK: (6/10121): Ponds were previously approved, Drainage Map 17. On the Drainage Map, there are two Design Point 8's shown. We assumed that the one shown at the upstream end of the American VVi||ovv Drive culvert is Design Point 5. A label for Design Point y is also missing. Fix the labels asneeded. TKE /6/1.0/21\: Co,mected, lQ. Replace both the Overall Drainage Map and the Drainage Map (Sheets Band 4) with copies that show the information onthe right side ofeach sheet that ismissing. TKE (G/10/21): Please review the revised report. 19. Subdivide Basin DA-Ltn account for runoff that is proposed to be tributary to the svvaie downstream of Design Point 1 8 and tributary to Curen's Ditch upstream of Design Point POAA, Update the HEC-HMS analysis to account for this revision. Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 5 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 TKE (6/10/21): The 1.5 CFS 100-yr flow from Basin L is collected by Cozen's Ditch and the downstream rneaclow.There is no reason to split that basin, and doing so would have no change in the outcome of the flow results. 20. Cozen's Ditch is shown relocated in places and remaining as existing in others. This Ditch must be regraded to provide the required capacity, plus freeboard, through the development. TKE (6/10/21): The ditch flows the required capacity as constructed and proposed reconstruction.The decreed irrigation right is 5 CFS®When the ditch adds in developed run-off,the the flows are combined. For instance,the ditch coming into-the easternmost feature pond 4,flows 7.5 CFS from developed flow and an additional 5 CFS of irrigation. 21. From GoogleEarth, it appears that the majority of Cozen Ditch has already been relocated, even in areas not planned to be disturbed per the Drainage Map,At the downstream end of the site,the Drainage Map indicates that Cozen's Ditch and the swale from Design Point DP-113 are intended to drain to the existing wetlands pond, but GoogleEarth indicates the Cozen's ditch was regraded and connected to the previous ditch alignment and the swale was not constructed. Update the Drainage Map to reflect the actual proposed conditions. TKE (6/10/21): That was a previous mistake made by Phelps Engineering in the previous drainage report.All detention and water quality is now provided on-site. 22. On Sheet 3 Overall Drainage Map, the design points shown in the HEC-HMS Drainage Basin Map flowchart do not match the design points on the Drainage Map or the analysis. For example, DP-08 should be DP-OS. Fix the HEC-HMS flowchart and replace it on Sheet 3 and the flowchart provided with the analysis. "rKE (6/10/21). The drainage map and the HEC-,HMS study now match. If you do not understand something, please call me directly to discuss. 23.Show the limits of the 0.2%floodplain (Zone X) on the Drainage Map since the southeast corner of the site and the existing wetlands pond are located within this zone. TKE (6/10/21): See the revised drainage map. 24. It appears that this project has the potential for disturbing existing wetlands areas Waters of the U.S.. Show the wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas on the Drainage Map. If so, the proposed fill within the wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas must be approved by the US Arm Corp of Engineers (USACE) by obtaining a 404 wetlands permit. Provide documentation that a permit has been obtained or that it is not required. TKE(6/10/21): There is a minor fill on the Zone-X floodplain(at the edge of the pool house),but it does negatively impact the shallow floodplain® Calculations 25. For the Grand Park Willows Street Capacity spreadsheet, provide the locations where these street sections/slopes are located. Also, verify that this analysis includes the reduction factor to determine the "allowable" street capacities. If not, apply the reduction factor. TKE (6/10/21): The locations are shown on the spreadsheet® 'The calculation includes the reduction -factor. 26. For the Allowable Street Capacity at DP-113, the 100-year capacity is only 13.8 cfs, but the street flow is 18.9 to 21.3 cfs along Narrow Leaf Ct. Provide inlets and a storm sewer system to decrease the street flows to the allowable capacity. Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 6 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 TKE(6/10/21):This calculation is for half of the street. For the full street capacity,double the allowable capacity shown in the calculation for half the street. 27. For the culvert capacity calculations, use 0.013 for RCP, not 0.12,for the Manning's n roughness value. TKE (6/10/21): Revised. 28. For the channel capacity calculations, provide the locations where the channel sections/slopes are located by including the design point, such as "Cozen Ditch DP-4". TKE(6/10/21): 'The ditch capacity is based on the minimum sloe in the ditch. Please refer to the Cozen's Ditch profile for slopes. We provide a range of ditch flows and capacities, based on ditch slope. 29. For the Cozen Ditch channel sizing calculations, increase the capacity to include both the decreed irrigation flo\/v and the 100-year design runoff from the development. If a decreed flow is not available, use the existing Cozen Ditch capacity(about 10 cfs per the calculations)just southeast of the development as the decreed flow. Also include at least 1 foot of freeboard. TKE(6/10/21).The decreed flow is 5cfs,and it is included in the ditch flows. Downstream of the Feature Pond 4 Cozen's Ditch diversion,we will allow 10 cfs to travel downstream for the short duration of the 100-yr flow. 30. For all of the Cozen Ditch channel calculations provided, the highest design flow is 10.3 cfs. At the downstream end of the development, based on runoff at Design Point 8, the Cozen Ditch must have a capacity of at least 36.0 cfs (26.0+ 10 for decreed flow), plus freeboard. Revise the Cozen Ditch design to provide the required capacity. TKE (6/10/21): The storm diversion on Feature Pond 4 removes the developed flows from the ditch. Anywhere that unintended flows could possibly overtop the ditch,the flow path is down the meadow and the downstream ponds. No development property could be impact by the ditch accidentally over- topping 31. Provide channel sizing calculations for all of the proposed swales,notjust Cozen Ditch.Also for existing swales used by this development to route runoff to verify they have adequate capacity. TKE(6/10/21): That would be overwhelming and riot helpful at all. Literally every building has a minor swale on all 4 sides. If you are concerned about something, please call me directly to discuss. We have covered all critical areas. 32. Provide inlet and storm sewer sizing calculations for all of the proposed storm sewers. Show and size a proposed inlet at Design Point 2. TKE (6/10/21): We will do that at final.This 90%issue is to respond to these comments. 33. Provide culvert sizing calculations for all of the proposed culverts, including for the existing trail, roadway, and cul-de-sac crossings to verify they have adequate capacity. TKE (6/10/21): See response to 32. 34. Provide riprap sizing calculations, TKE (6/10/21): See response to 32. 35a At all storm sewer SUrnp locations, provide emergency overflow calculations to determine the depth of overtopping assuming the inlets or culverts are plugged. Verify that the overflows will be contained with drainage easements and that there is at least 1 foot of freeboard to the finished grade for adjacent structures. Fraser—GPVVAResponse Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page June 10, Z021 ]N: 19008 TKE (6/10/21):We do not calculate over-topping for plugged culverts, iammnot aware of any condition on this site that a plugged culvert has the potential for flooding a building, which is what you are concerned about. 36. Drainage Basins DA-VV09, DA-10, DA-K, DA-G, DA,H, and DA-M will not be tributary to the existing wetlands pond. Either provide over-detention by reducing the 10 and 100-year pond release rates or provide additional detention ponds to reduce the developed condition flows to historic rates. TKE (6/10/21): Please review the revised report. 37. The PheYpscalculations were not reviewed since the proposed Phelps drainage plan is significantly different than the current TKE plan in multiple locations,Also,since the Phelps Drainage Map provided on Page 144y does not show the channel section and culvert locations, so it was too difficult to follow, TKE (6/10/21): Okay. 38. For the 2015 Phelps Phase U| Drainage Report, calculations for channel sizing and other drainage improvements are provided that appear to have been superseded bythe TKE report. To ovoid this confusion, only include excerpts/calculations from the Phelps report that are needed to support the current design and highlight the relevant information. Examples would be to delete the Existing Cozens Ditch at American VViUovv Drive Crossing analysis and the Proposed Cozens Ditch 413-inmh Culvert Under American Willow Drive analysis since new sizing calculations are provided inthe TKE report arid delete the soils information since itiyalso provided inthe TKEreport. TKE (6/10/21): This report now stands on its own. 39. For the existing wetlands pond, the available storage volume and release rates in the 2015 Phelps report conflict with the volume and rates inthe 2OO8 Carroll & Lange-K4anhardTovvn Center at Grand Park Wetland Pond Weir Outlet letter and analysis. The 2009 Carroll & Lange letter and as-built analysis appears to match closely tothe original design which resulted in a 4.3-inch depth and 10.46cfs release rate for the 100-year storm event. The Phelps analysis used a depth of 0.13 feet for the 1 00-year storm event which is not acceptable tm use unless more recent as-built information is provided. The as-built information must account for providing freeboard and the capacity of the pond culvert outlet that crosses Hwy. 40. TKE (6/1O/21): The wetlands cells are no longer utilized for the Willows. Note that the 200B Town Center at Grand Park drainage report by Carroll & Lange appears to have analyzed the existing wetlands pond by routing flow through each cell (A, Band C) which appear to be at different elevations with weir controls for each cell. The peak discharge was reduced asflow was routed through each cell and resulted in a 100-year release rate of 13. 2 cfs from Cell Cwhich is similar to the original design release rate of 10.5 cfs. This method ofanalysis would be acceptable, but what was not clear is the tributary area and percent imperviousness used for the analysis.This must be made clear and include all tributary area. TKE (6/10/21): The wetlands cells are mo longer utilized for the Willows. Construction Plans 4O. Updated Sheets 3and 4Drainage Maps per the above comments. TKE (6/10Y21): See revised maps. 41. Show all existing wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas on the Existing Conditions and Grading Plans (Sheets 5and 12). TKE (6/10/21): See revised maps. Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 8 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 42. On Sheet 5, update the existing conditions to reflect the improvements that have already been constructed at the site or that have not yet been constructed. Note that the swale from Design Point DP- 1B does not appear to be constructed per GoogleEarth but is shown as constructed on Sheet 5. TILE (6/10/21): See revised. 43. Update Sheet 10 as needed to provide erosion protection for revisions to the drainage plan. TILE (6/10/21): See revised. 44. On Sheet 12 Grading Plan, per the contours it appears that the available flow depth at the following structures is minimal. Verify that the finished floor elevations (including any proposed basements)for all structures are above the proposed 100-year water surface plus at least 1 foot of freeboard. Backwater at culverts must also be considered. TILE (6/10/21): All building structures meet this condition. a. There appears to only be 2 feet of depth from the Clubhouse building the Relocated Cozen Ditch invert. TILE (6/10/21): See revised. b.There appears to only be about 2 feet of depth (or less)from the existing Cozen Ditch invert to the existing structures along the east side of Mountain Willow Drive between Bluestein Ct. and American Willow Drive. TILE (6/10/21): You do not have any finished floor elevations to review, so I'm not sure how you can make that statement. There is no concern of flooding any existing or proposed structures with the Cozen's Ditch. c. There appears to be minimal depth from the existing structure at the end of Narrowleaf Ct. to the proposed swale invert from Design Point 1 B. TILE(6/10/21): 'There is no concern of flooding any existing or proposed structures with the Cozen's Ditch. 45. On Sheet 24, label and provide the invert elevations for the culvert crossing American Willow Drive near Sta. 6+00. TKE(6/10/21): See the utility plan for elevations.We are not going to label every utility with all design information on every sheet, plan and profile. 46.On Sheet 36, label the culvert in the top profile.Also, label the storm sewers on Sheet 32 to match the profile titles. TILE (6/10/21): See response 45. Labeling information in multiple places on multiple sheets increases the liability for future plan changes. That is Drafting 101.The information you are looking for is in the set.Also,the storm profile has elevation labels at those headwall locations anyway. Sanitary Sewer Collection System It is noted that the Willows Apartments as proposed plans for 258 EQR, approximately twice the original master plan for this area. Based on the limiting reach (slope = 0.3%) of the downstream sewers, only 15 EQR can be added before exceeding the Town's design criteria of pipes at a maximum 50%full. GRAND PARK (6/10/21): Grand Park understands that stretch of sewer could be nearing the 50% full capacity trigger and will upgrade the line when actual observation confirms the pipe is 50051 full, as is industry standard care of practice. ......................................... Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 9 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 American Willow Drive ROW Based on previous Sketch Plans provided to the Town, American Willow Drive is proposed to ultimately connect to Hwy 40 to the north of the Willow Apartments development.A connection to a State Highway will result in American Willow Drive being classified as a collector street with a minimum required ROW width of 60 feet. This will affect the proposed layout of buildings, roadways and utilities for the Willows Apartments as currently shown. TKE(6/10/21): We understand.The site plan is being revised to changes American Willow to a 60'ROW. The roadway design does not change, and the current building locations meet required setbacks. The Willows Apartments Construction Plans 1. Sheet 29: a. The water main "bubble loops" at the west and central zones of the apartments need to be connected to provide greater redundancy, improve flow, pressure and velocity (same comment for Sheets 30). TKE (6/10/21):We added a water connection between Phase 1 and 2. b.Add bends at existing cross in American Willow Drive to locate the proposed water main under the proposed pavement. TKE (6/10/21):Completed as discussed, c. Move water main at the south side of the east zone to under the asphalt area. TKE (6/10/21):Completed. 2. Sheet 30 (Note two sheets#30 included in plan set): a. West zone apartments Sanitary Sewer. L There are two sanitary sewer manholes within a short distance. Eliminated one or provide an explanation as to why this is not possible. TKE (6/10/21):Completed. ii.The sanitary sewer and storm sewer cross at a severe angle. Can this be reduced? TKE (6/10/21). We revised it to a 45 degree angle.To make the angle steeper,we would have to add an unnecessary manhole. iii. Sanitary Sewer service cleanouts are not provided for long services and are not shown at the buildings.Add cleanout locations to plans. TKE(6/10/21): Long services were eliminated. We added 3 cleanouts on the only services over 100 ft. iv. Three services are very close to each other at SSMH-WM 1-21.8A-1, 4.5' from MH to most downstream service. Extend MH south to provide better separation. TKE (6/10/21): The services are separated by 2',which is adequate spacing. v. Call out Sanitary Sewer Service pipe lengths and percent slope on plans (not shown in profile). TKE (6/10/21):Completed. b. West zone apartments Watermains. L Call out water service lengths and bends. TKE (6/10/21): Completed. c. General notes. ........... q Fraser—GPVVAResponse Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 10 June 10, Z021 JN: 19008 iPlan readability overlapping text and pipe labels without leaders. TKE (6/10/21): Plans were adjusted. 3. Sheet]U (Two sheets#3U): a. Central & Eastern zone apartments Sanitary Sewer. i There are two sanitary sewer manholes within a short distance. Eliminated one or provide an explanation astowhy this isnot possible. TKE (6/10/21): Completed. ii. Move sanitary sewer manholes topaved areas. TKE (6/10/21): Completed where feasible. iii. Sanitary Sewer service cleanouts are not provided for long services and are not shown at the buildings.Add cleanout locations to plans. TKE(6/10/21): Long services were eliminated. We added 3 cUeanoutoon the only services over 100 ft. iv. The proposed sanitary sewer service for the Clubhouse has less than 3 feet ofcover where it crosses the ditch. Aditch check shall be provided, and the pipe concrete encased. It is also recommended that insulation be placed over the service where the depth is less than required by Town criteria.The swimming pool discharge appears to be too low for gravity service and may require pumping. Please verify. A permit for the pool should be required and the Town notified prior to draining only allowed at night. 'TKE (6/%0/21): Revised.The depth at the ditch is 7.2 . v. Call out Sanitary Sewer Service pipe lengths and percent slope on plans (not shown in profile). TKE (6/1Q/21): Completed. b. Central & Eastern zone apartments VVa1ermains. i Add bends a1existing cross in American VVi||ovv Drive to locate the proposed water main under the proposed pavement east and west ofAmerican Willow Drive. "rNE (6/10/21): Completed. ii. Move FH assembly to provide 10' separation from adjacent sanitary sewer. TNE (6/10/21): Completed, iii. Move water main under pavement area as much as possible. TKE (6/10/21): Completed.. k/ Call out water service lengths and bends. TKE (6/10/21): Completed. v. Provide valve and temporary plug at north end of project and use FH as blow off. TKE (6/10/21): Completed. cGeneral notes. iPlan readability-overlapping text and pipe labels without leaders. TKE (6/10y21): Completed. ��______' Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 11 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 4. Sheet 33: i. Straighten pipe runs to minimize deflections and fittings. TKE(6/10/21)- There are no unnecessary fittings or deflections.The PVC pipe required straight runs with no deflections at normal pipe joints. So, DI bends are require to give some flexibility in layout. ii. Stationing shown in the pipe profile is from road alignment, not pipe alignment. TKE (6/10/21): 'That is as intended. The individual utility profiles are for convenience and are not necessary. I can remove their from the set if you prefer. iii. Show all pipe crossings-storm is not shown TKE (6/10/21): See the profile for American Willow Drive for storm crossing. iv. Overlapping text- difficult to read TKE (6/10/21), Completed. 5. Sheet 34: i. Straighten pipe runs to minimize deflections and fittings. TKE (6/10/21); See Response for 4(i). ii. Stationing shown in the pipe profile is from road alignment, not pipe alignment. TKE (6/10/21): See Response for 4(fl). iii. Show all pipe crossings-sanitary and storm are not shown. TKE (6/10/21): If a crossing is not shown, then look at the street profile® If you are concerned about something specific,then be specific. iv. Overlapping text-difficult to read. TKE (6/10/21): Completed. v. Eliminate low point in water main. TKE (6/10/21):The low point is minor and will not negatively affect anything. 6. Sheet 35: i. Eliminate second manhole in SS West 1 &SS West 2 alignments and ad-just the pipes accordingly. TKE (6/10/21):Completed. ii. Show all pipe crossings-water and storm are not shown. TKE(6/10/21):Again,look at the road profiles for all storm crossings.The utility specific profiles under roadways are for convenience. iii. Hydrant lateral may conflict with sanitary sewer main on SS East Profile/Alignment. TKE (6/10/21)-,There is no conflict. Please call with any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Preliminary Plan) Page 12 June 10, 2021 JN: 19008 TKE Engineering, LLC Anthony E. ny) Krempin, PE Principal ............A JV NO I FoI10 6,anf_\ March 10, 2021 JN: 19008 Town of Fraser C/o Russell Pennington Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 80447 Re: Sketch Plan-Engineering Response GRAND PARK–THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS Dear Russell: This response letter accompanies our preliminary plat and 70%civil construction plan issue for Grand Park –The Willows Apartments (Issue#1, dated 3/8/21). Please see our response comments below. COMMENTS Fraser Recreation — Field House Expansion A sketch was provided with the application. The schematic layout is outside of the subdivision boundary and was not included in the Public Works review. GRAND PARK (3/10/21)-, The schematic layout was provided for overall coordination Purposes and is NOT'a part of this project. Traffic/Transportation System/CDOT Publics Works' Staff along with the Planning Staff contacted Brian Killian, the CDOT Region 3 Access Program Manager. Brian provided the following comments from CDOT: 1. CDOT will require an updated traffic study to evaluate the following intersections. 1. Kings Crossing/ Hwy 40 2. Second Street/Hwy 40 3. First Street/Hwy 40 4. Old Victory Way/ Hwy 40. 2. If any of those intersections increased traffic volumes by 20%or more,they will need to obtain a CDOT access permit. 3. If the traffic study identifies any safety or operational issues,they will need to mitigate those. 4. It' s recommended that the developers Traffic Engineer submit a traffic study methodology to CDOT prior to conducting the traffic study. CDOT indicated that additional comments would be possible after a formal proposal is made to CDOT. Public Works will also review at that time and could have future comments. TKE(3/10/21). Please refer to the attached FHU Trip Generation review letter that address the concerns presented. The Town of Fraser will require the dedication and paving of Old Victory Road from Mountain Willow Drive to the intersection at Kings Crossing Road. "rKE (3/10/21): This is as proposed,with the exception to the portion between Mountain Willow Drive and the new internal subdivision entry off Old Victory Road,west of American Willow drive.Grand Park intends to use the unpaved section as the access and staging area for the future development area adjacent to it which will be completed later. Fraser—GPVVA Response Letter(Sketch Plan) Page Z March 10, 2021 ]N: 19008 Utilities All utility infrastructure must adhere to standards found in the Town of Fraser Municipal Code. Plans and specifications for the utilities must be submitted to the Town to be reviewed for adherence to the Articles in the [ode, prior to construction. TKE (3/10y21,)/ The 7096plan issue iadesigned Kn accordance with the Fraser Standards. Onsite water mains, providing looping within the property are required to provide adequate service and fire protection and should not include any clead-end lines. It is the Town's understanding that the internal, looped mains for the entire development will be completed during the Phase 1 construction. TKE(3/10/21): Please refer tnthe attached utility plans for further detail.All water lines are looped as required. Identify looped line connection points and other pipe attributes necessary to model. This model will be incorporated into the Town' s vvater model. TKE (3/10/21): Please refer to the attached utility plans for further detail. Downstream collection system capacity isa concern. The development in question is located within the Cozens Meadows Sewer Shed. The Cozens Meadows Sewer Shed is currently tied into and borrowing capacity from the adjacent Forest Meadows Sewer Shed. Public Works staff, along with it' s engineering consultant, Merrick Engineering has investigated this potential capacity issue. Currently,the existing sewer is generally not over capacity,the only exception being one flat reach of pipe from MH CM039 to MH CM038 (zero slope should be verified). However, when the Willows Apartments are constructed, the sewer is shown to be overloaded along much of the Forest Meadows sewer line. Because the development will cause multiple reaches to exceed 50% full, it will be required that sewer improvements be implemented prior to construction of the Willows Apartments, via a sewer crossing of Highway 4O,just north of Old Victory Road or, alternatively, up»izin0the Forest Meadows sewers. GRAND PARK (3/10/21): Grand Park understands that stretch of sewer could be nearing the 50% full capacity trigger and will upgrade the line when actual observation confirms the pipe is 50%full, ayis industry standard care of practice. Stormwater The existing Willows Subdivision sturnnwaterdetention system will need to beevaluated toensure that the system has the capacity and will operate properly with this change in density. This assumes that the existing system will be utilized for the stormwater detention for this apartment project. TKE(3/10/21)/ Please refer to the Phase 2stormmxwater report for further detail,which is an addendum to the approved Phelps's 2016report. Cozens Jitch A letter from USACE is required that approves the realignment of Cozens Ditch prior to construction plan approval. GRAND PARK (3/1.0/21): Grand Park is currently working with the USACE to realign the ditch as proposed in this plan. Fraser—GPWA Response Letter(Sketch Plan) Page 3 March 10, 2021 JN: 19008 Grand Park Pond Operating Agreement Cornerstone has requested that,going forward,the augmentation water supplies to meet water demands associated with development in Grand Park be separate from the augmentation supplies relied upon for development in Rendezvous. Cornerstone and the Town are currently working together on preparing the easement and operating agreement between them, that is necessary for the Town' s operation of the Grand Park augmentation water supplies,including water storage rights previously dedicated to the Town. GRAND PARK (3/10/21): Cornerstone provided the Westside Facilities Agreement to the 'Town on January 11, 20.21 which is a follow-on document to thie already existing Grant of Easement and Augmentation Pond Joint Operations Agreement entered into between the Town,„ Rendezvous and Cornerstones In addition,Cornerstone has continued to assist Fraser with water augmentation releases out of its water supplies. Please call with any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, TKE Engineering, LLC Anthony E. ny) Krempin, PE Principal May 19, 2021 Ms. Trotter Willows Apartments Preliminary Plats & Final Plan Dear Ms. Trotter, On behalf of Grand Park Development, Holley, Albertson & Polk, P.C, TKE Civil & Structural Engineering, and Terracina Design we request a continuance of the Planning Commission hearing to the first date possible after providing timely public notice. The following is a response to comments. PRELIMINARY PLATS: Add land use table to plats. The table shall include: land uses, approximate acreage of each land use and percentage of each land use, total acreage and square footage of property, total numbers of lots and maximum number of each type of dwelling unit proposed and parking. See attached Checklist. RESPONSE: The final plat will include required land use data and parking. Add OVR building and improvement setbacks to plat in accordance with the Grand Park PDD (Rec.# 2005012709), Sheet 3. For consistency, use similar language that is on Final Plan. RESPONSE: Noted. Language from final plan will be used. Clarify plat note #10. All setbacks are zero. For consistency, use similar language on Final Plan. RESPONSE: Language from final plan will be used. FINAL PLAN: Add density transfer chart/reserve to Final Plan, including which Planning Area density is being transferred from in accordance with Article 4.0 of the 2003 Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement (Rec. #2003-016733). RESPONSE: Note #6 provides an explanation of which planning areas units are transferred from. A separate table showing all of Grand Park will be provided similar to when 3wc was processed. On sheet 12 of 14 of the Final Plan, denote bus stops as existing or proposed. RESPONSE: Plan will be revised OTHER: Provide a letter from USACE approving the realignment of Cozens Ditch prior to construction plan approval and plat recordation. RESPONSE: Noted Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment (All dead-end streets require turnarounds or cul- de-sacs per Attachment A-12 - Cul-De-Sac and Turnarounds for Streets. All turnarounds shall provide ten (10) feet of level, treeless ground around the perimeter. Special attention should be given to provide adequate functional snow storage and sight distance. All turnarounds shall be signed "Emergency Turn Around, No Parking Anytime."). RESPONSE: A turn around easement will be provided over the clubhouse drop-off area which is at the end of the road and is a 24' paved surface 130' in diameter. ROD MCGOWAN COMMENTS: 1. The April 91h FPDP graphics (Sheet 4 etc.) and legal description improperly incorporate parcels labelled "23W" and count those parcels in the open space calculations. Under the Annexation Agreement and PDD, the Planning Area 23W designated open space parcel is separate from the development Planning Areas and cannot be split into small pieces and made a part of a development area. The PDD provides that, in addition to the designated open space parcels like 23W, each development Planning Area is to include additional open space according to the Development Standards, which specify a minimum of 10% open space for Planning Area 2W. The legal descriptions, plans and plats must be revised consistent with this approach (see, e.g., the FPDP included with the 3- 22-21 submittal). The revised plans must be submitted for review prior completion of the staff report to the Planning Commission, or staff will recommend denial of the application. RESPONSE (SCOTT ALBERTSON Holley, Albertson & Polk, P.C.) No provisions in the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement, as amended by the 2005 PDD contemplates that open space Planning Area 23 W would be a contiguous parcel during the development of Grand Park and remain under single ownership. Similarly, I find nothing that prohibits inclusion of portions of 23W in subdivision plats as development proceeds, as long as PA 23W remains open space. Both the FPDPs and plats for Elk Creek and Meadows include Tracts that are parts of PA 23W; specifically, Tract H1 in Elk Creek Filing 3 (Note 6), Tracts H2 and H3 in Elk Creek Filing 4 (Note 6) and Tract C in the Meadows (Note 16). These properties remain part of PA 23 W,just as the Tracts included within proposed Willows Filings 1 and 2 will remain part of PA 23W and be limited to use as open space. In addition, for the most part, the situation with the PA 23 W open space Tracts in the Willows is identical to that resulting in the creation of 23W Tracts in Elk Creek and Meadows. Each of the Tracts is defined by the roadways adjacent to or within the Willows, i.e. Old Victory Road to the southwest, American Willow Drive at the entry to Willows Apartments Filing 1 from OVR and Mountain Willow Drive as the main access road bisecting PA 2W. Note 16 in the PDD has relevance in recognizing that changes may occur "based on market conditions and other factors that may affect the land use mix, intensity, and design of the planning areas over the projected twenty- five year development period." Similarly, Section 19-4-165 Of the Municipal Code has relevance in establishing the following criteria for open space: "Avoidance of concentrating open space into large areas with the subsequent `packing' of residential areas" and "Open space and/or landscaping accompanies all types of developments." The layout of the subdivision as depicted in the Filing 1 and 2 Preliminary Plats and the inclusion of the PA 23W open space Tracts is consistent with the above and in no way violates any provision of the Annexation Agreement, as amended by the 2005 PDD. Further, it is consistent with the precedent established by prior Grand Park subdivisions, a precedent established by Fraser and relied on by Grand Park Development, LLC. 2. The submittal does not include adequate provisions for the dedication and construction of Old Victory Road, from the existing terminus at Mountain Willow Drive to Kings Crossing Road. The "response comments" submitted indicate that that a portion between Mountain Willow Drive and American Willow Drive will remain unpaved. That is not acceptable. Further, the plats must be amended to include and dedicate adjacent portions of OVR and documentation for dedication of off-site portions of OVR must be submitted. The settlement agreement in the underpass litigation allows a permanent easement to be granted for the segment of OVR from Grand Park Drive to Kings Crossing Road, pending development of Planning Area 1 Wb. The remaining portion must be dedicated or conveyed to the Town as a public street. These matters must be addressed prior completion of the staff report to the Planning Commission, or staff will recommend denial of the application. RESPONSE: The Old Victory Road ROW will be dedicated via a separate instrument. As discussed with staff, a phasing plan will be provided with the Final Plat submittal that delineates timing of phasing, ROW dedication, and paving. It is important to existing residents that construction traffic and staging be located as far from their homes as possible. To that end, the intention is to use OVR for construction staging while local traffic is routed along Mountain Willow Drive. 3. Since the final plat for Filing 1 will include the OVR right-of-way and encompass all of the area to be included in Filing 2. The Filing 1 preliminary plat must be amended to include all of that area, showing the Filing 2 area as a separate tract for future development. RESPONSE: Filing 1 plat will not include OVR ROW as mentioned in the previous comment, however a parcel for Filing 2 will be created with the Filing 1 Final Plat. 4. The Public Transit Plan included in the FPDP (Sheet 12) must be amended to conform with the Transit Plan approved as part of the FPDP for the Meadows and Planning Area 3Wc (Rec. #2020001835). The Plan included with the April 9th submittal is not consistent with such previously approved Plan. This item must also be addressed prior to completion of staff's report to the Planning Commission. RESPONSE: Per the meeting with Staff on May 13th, it was determined that the difference in plans was the variation between the proposed private trails that were shown on the 3Wc FPPD and 2w.2 FPDP. The title and purpose of this plan is to demonstrate the latest "Public Transit" routes and stops in place. The proposed 2w.2 Public Transit plan shows the latest Lift routes and bus stops. trails shown on the 3Wc plan was simply a background layer depicting a possible proposed private trail system that is in no way implies a reservation or dedication of transit routes. All trails and pedestrian routes will be removed from the plans to reduce confusion on what the plan is intended to depict. March 10, 2021 Ms. Catherine Trotter Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 80442 RE: Grand Park-Willows Apartments Dear Ms. Trotter, On behalf of Grand Park Development, Terracina Design, TKE, Blackbox Design Studios, and Massimino Development we have reviewed the comments from the Sketch Plan.The following is a response to comments: TOWN: Please be advised that the Fraser Recreation - Fieldhouse Expansion was included inthis application. This schematic layout is outside of the subdivision boundary and as such will not be included in the Town of Fraser review and comments. RESPONSE: Understood.The sketch for the fleldhouse was provided to show the overall concept for the potential future extension of American Willow Dr. TOWN: We briefly discussed this development application with Brian Killian, COOT Region 3 Access Program Manager, and he has provided the attached traffic and safety comments on West Mountain and Willows Apartments. RESPONSE: Lyle DeVries at FHU has been in contact With Brian Killian at CDOT. Included with the FPDP submittal is an updated traffic letter. TOWN: Staff has concerns about water and sewer for this development (water model, sewer capacity, detention ponds). See attached initial engineering and utility review comments from Russell Pennington. RESPONSE: See comment response letter from TKE. TOWN: There shall be a minimum of two (2) vehicular ingress/egress access points to any development over two (2) acres in size. The Town of Fraser will require the dedication ardpaving of Old Victory Road from Lot I on the minor plat for Willows Apartments at Grand Park Minor Subdivision down to the intersection at Kings Crossing Road. RESPONSE:Old Victory Road is being dedicated via a separate document associated with the railroad underpass project. Further discussions With the town will be had to determine which portions of Old Victory Road will be paved with this project to provide adequate access, future construction access, and minimize disturbance to surrounding neighbors. TOWN: Add a turnaround at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment (All dead-end streets require turnarounds or cul-de-sacs per Attachment A-12- Cul-De-Sac and Turnarounds for Streets.All turnarounds shall provide ten (10) feet of level, treeless ground around the perimeter. Special attention should be given to provide adequate functional snow storage and sight distance. All turnarounds shall be signed "Emergency Turn Around, No Parking Anytime."). RESPONSE: American Willow has been extended past the entry 1 to the clubhouse to create a temporary hammerhead turn-around condition at the end of the road. TOWN: Sidewalks in residential areas shall be required on at least one (1) side of the street if ti; are not provided and shall be a minimum of five (5) feet wide. RESPONSE: American Willow Drive and Mountain Willow drive are both the standard 36' public road sections used in Grand Park with a walk on one side. All internal parking drives have walks necessary for circulation and ADA accessibility. TOWN: Clarify HUD process for requiring building permit approval and how this will be accomplished. RESPONSE: Grand Park Development, LLC will obtain final plat approval by the Town of Fraser but will not record the final plat until after the HUD closing. The to be created apartment lots will be contracted with the apartment developer GP Willows Apartments I.I.C. Once a plat is recorded, the lot(s)will be conveyed to GP Willows Apartments LLC,who will then pay all building permit fees and pull the building permits. The HUD process will require confirmation the building plans and permit submittals have been reviewed and approved and may be issued upon recordation of the final plat and payment of the building permit fees. Everything must be approved by Fraser in advance of the final HUD approval and closing. Very similar to the process performed with Grand County for the Mill Apartments TOWN: Clarify process for eliminating The Willows Filing 4, and amending Recorded Final Plan. RESPONSE: Willows filing 4 was never recorded. A Final Plan Development Plan Amendment 2 to the Willows Subdivision Planning Area 2w is a part of this FPDP and Preliminary Plat submittal. This Amendment 2 to the Willows Final Plan will be handled in the same fashion as Amendment I to the Willows Final Plan and reflect the current plans for the proposed development areas. Given that Filing #4 was never recorded the Phase one final plat for this project that is being processed concurrently will plat and dedicate the R.O.W that was originally included as part of Filing#4 from the point Filling#3 stops to Old Victory Road. TOWN:We will require a letter from USACE approving the realignment of Cozens Ditch prior toplat recordation. RESPONSE:Grand Park is working With USACE on the realignment of Cozens Ditch. We understand the Town is requiring a letter from USACE regarding Cozens Ditch prior to recordation of the Final Plat for the Willows Apartments. TOWN:Confirm density/acre. Add to site data chart. RESPONSE:Charts have been updated based off updated boundaries. Please feel free to call myself or any member of our team with any questions you may have. Sincerely, Jeff Marck 2 .:y• DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY .f 1 . ` CORPS OF ENGINEERS,ALBUQUERQUE DISTRICT 4101 JEFFERSON PLAZA NE ALBUQUERQUE,NM 87109-3435 __. May 21, 2021 Regulatory Division (SPK-2002-75601) Grand Park Development, LLC Attn: Mr. Clark Lipscomb Post Office Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 clark cstoneholdings.com Dear Mr. Lipscomb: We are responding to your request for a Department of the Army (DA) permit for the Willows Apartments at Grand Park project. The approximate 22-acre project area is located within the Grand Park Development site, north of Leland Creek, and on the Cozens Ditch within the Town of Fraser, centered at Latitude 39.9304530, Longitude -105.794870, Grand County, Colorado. Based on the information you provided to this office, the Willows Apartments at Grand Park project involves the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States, subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The specific activity that requires DA authorization is relocating a 1,070-linear-foot reach of Cozens Ditch to the east of its existing alignment to facilitate residential development. The project will result in an additional 100 linear feet of man-made ditch. The proposed activities would be conducted in accordance with the preconstruction notification plans dated September 9, 2020, and the revised Cozens Ditch Relocation Plan map submitted to the Corps on May 18, 2021. We have determined that activities in waters of the United States associated with the project are authorized by Nationwide Permit (NWP) 46— Discharges in Ditches. You must comply with all terms and conditions of the NWP and applicable regional conditions. Enclosed is information about the NWP terms and conditions and 2017 Albuquerque District regional conditions for Colorado (enclosure 1). You should pay particular attention to General Condition 12 — Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls, and General Condition 30 which requires that you sign the enclosed Compliance Certification (enclosure 2) and return it to this office within 30 days after completion of the authorized work. This verification is valid until March 18, 2022, when the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked, you will have 12 months from the date of the modification, reissuance, or revocation to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions. Failure to comply with the general and regional conditions of this NWP may result in the suspension or revocation of your authorization. We would appreciate your feedback on this permit action including your interaction with our staff and processes. For more information about our program or to complete our Regulatory Program national customer service survey, visit our website at https://www.spa.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Program-and-Permits/. -2- Please refer to identification number SPK-2002-75601 in any correspondence concerning this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Northwestern Colorado Branch, 400 Rood Avenue, Room 224, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, by email at Ben jamin.R.Wilson(a)-usace.army.mil, or telephone at 970-243-1199, extension 1012. Sincerely, Benjamin R. Wilson Project Manager NW Colorado Branch Enclosures cc: Noah Greenberg, SWCA Environmental Consultants, Noah.Greenberg(@.swca.com Catherine Trotter, Town of Fraser, ctrotter town.fraser.co.us 4. Regional Conditions for Colorado. Nationwide http://www.spk.usace.arnmmy.inil/Portals/12/docgnments/reguia to> >/nwp/2017 nwps/Final 2017 Regional Conditions in Permit Summary Colorado.pdf?ver=2017-03-23-133821-047 U S Army Corps of 33 CFR Part 330; Issuance of Nationwide B. Nationwide Permit General Conditions Engineers Permits—March 19,2017 Note: To qualify for NWP authorization,the prospective Sacramento District permittee must comply with the following general conditions,as applicable,in addition to any regional or case-specific conditions imposed by the division engineer or district engineer. material into non-tidal Discharges -t idal ditches that are:Ditches.Discharges of dredged or fill Prospective permittees should contact the appropriate Corps madistrict office to determine if regional conditions have been (1) Constructed in uplands, imposed on an NWP.Prospective permittees should also contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine the status of (2) receive water from an area determined to be a water of Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification and/or the United States prior to the construction of the ditch, Coastal Zone Management Act consistency for an NWP.Every (3) divert water to an area determined to be a water of the person who may wish to obtain permit authorization under one United States prior to the constriction of the ditch,and or more NWPs,or who is currently relying on an existing or prior permit authorization under one or more NWPs,has been (4) detennined to be waters of the United States. and is on notice that all of the provisions of 33 CFR 330.1 The discharge must not cause the loss of greater than one acre of through 330.6 apply to every NWP authorization.Note waters of the United States. This NWP does not authorize especially 33 CFR 330.5 relating to the modification, discharges of dredged or fill material into ditches constructed in suspension,or revocation of any NWP authorization. streams or other waters of the United States,or in streams that ❑ 1. Navigation. have been relocated in uplands.This NWP does not authorize discharges of dredged or fill material that increase the capacity ❑ (a) No activity may cause more than a minimal of the ditch and drain those areas determined to be waters of the adverse effect on navigation. United States prior to construction of the ditch. ❑ (b) Any safety lights and signals prescribed by the Notification: The permittee must submit a pre-construction U.S. Coast Guard,through regulations or otherwise,must notification to the district engineer prior to commencing the be installed and maintained at the permittee's expense on activity. (See general condition 32.)(Authority: Section 404) authorized facilities in navigable waters of the United States. ❑ (c)The permittee understands and agrees that, if A. Regional Conditions future operations by the United States require the 1. Regional Conditions for California,excluding the removal,relocation,or other alteration,of the structure or Tahoe Basin work herein authorized,or if,in the opinion of the Secretary of the Arany or his authorized representative, http://www.spk.usace.arny.nmil/Portals/12/documents/regula said structure or work shall cause unreasonable for /wp/2017 nwps/Final SPK Regional Conditions for obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, _Cali fornia.pdfNer=2017-03-23-120307-207 the permittee will be required,upon due notice from the 2. Regional Conditions for Nevada,including the Corps of Engineers,to remove,relocate,or alter the Tahoe Basin structural work or obstructions caused thereby,without expense to the United States.No claim shall be made hhttp://www.spk.usace.ai-niy.mil/Portals/12/documents/regu against the United States on account of any such removal latory/nwp/2017—nwps/Final_SPK Regional Conditions fo or alteration. r Nevada.pdt?ver=2017-03-23-120306-910 ❑ 2. Aquatic Life Movements.No activity may 3. Regional Conditions for Utah substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle movements of those hitp://www.spk.usace.amiy.mil/Portals/12/documents/regula species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody,including for /y nwp/2017 nwps/Final SPK Re ional_Conditions_for those species that normally migrate through the area,unless the Utah.pdf?ver=2017-03-23-120303-503 activity's primary purpose is to impound water.All pennanent and temporary crossings of waterbodies shall be suitably culverted,bridged,or otherwise designed and constructed to maintain low flows to sustain the movement of those aquatic BUILDING STRONG® U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS—SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J ST. —SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 www.spk.usace.army.mil www.facebook.com/sacramentodistrict www.youtube.com/sacramentodistrict Encl 1 www.twitter.com/USACESacramento www.flickr.com/photos/sacramentodistrict Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 2 species. If a bottomless culvert cannot be used,then the crossing ❑ 13. Removal of Temporary Fills. Temporary fills must be should be designed and constructed to minimize adverse effects removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to Pre- to aquatic life movements. construction elevations. The affected areas must be revegetated, ❑ 3. Spawning Areas.Activities in spawning areas during as appropriate. spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent ❑ 14. Proper Maintenance. Any authorized structure or fill practicable.Activities that result in the physical destruction(e.g., shall be properly maintained,including maintenance to ensure through excavation,fill,or downstream smothering by public safety and compliance with applicable NWP general substantial turbidity)of an important spawning area are not conditions,as well as any activity-specific conditions added by authorized. the district engineer to an NWP authorization. ❑ 4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas.Activities in waters ❑ 15. Single and Complete Project. The activity must be a of the United States that serve as breeding areas for migratory single and complete project. The same NWP cannot be used birds must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. more than once for the same single and complete project. ❑ 5. Shellfish Beds.No activity may occur in areas of ❑ 16. Wild and Scenic Rivers. concentrated shellfish populations,unless the activity is directly ❑ (a) No NWP activity may occur in a component of the related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWPs 4 and 48,or is a shellfish seeding or habitat restoration activity National Wild and Scenic River System,or in a river authorized by NWP 27. officially designated by Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an ❑ 6. Suitable Material.No activity may use unsuitable official study status,unless the appropriate Federal agency material(e.g.,trash,debris,car bodies,asphalt,etc.). Material with direct management responsibility for such river,has used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic determined in writing that the proposed activity will not pollutants in toxic amounts(see section 307 of the Clean Water adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or Act). study status. ❑ 7. Water Supply Intakes.No activity may occur in the ❑ (b)If a proposed NWP activity will occur in a proximity of a public water supply intake,except where the component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, activity is for the repair or improvement of public water supply or in a river officially designated by Congress as a "study intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. river" for possible inclusion in the system while the river is ❑ 8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments. If the activity in an official study status,the permittee must submit a pre- creates an impoundment of water,adverse effects to the aquatic construction notification(see general condition 32). The system due to accelerating the passage of water,and/or district engineer will coordinate the PCN with the Federal restricting its flow must be minimized to the maximum extent agency with direct management responsibility for that river. practicable. The permittee shall not begin the NWP activity until notified by the district engineer that the Federal agency with ❑ 9. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent direct management responsibility for that river has practicable,the preconstruction course,condition,capacity,and determined in writing that the proposed NWP activity will location of open waters must be maintained for each activity, not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation including stream channelization, storm water management or study status. activities,and temporary and permanent road crossings,except ❑ (c)Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be as provided below. The activity must be constructed to withstand obtained from the appropriate Federal land management expected high flows. The activity must not restrict or impede the agency responsible for the designated Wild and Scenic passage of normal or high flows,unless the primary purpose of River or study river(e.g.,National Park Service, U.S.Forest the activity is to impound water or manage high flows.The Service,Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and activity may alter the preconstruction course,condition, Wildlife Service). Information on these rivers is also capacity,and location of open waters if it benefits the aquatic available at: http://www.rivers.gov/. environment(e.g.,stream restoration or relocation activities). ❑ 10. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. The activity must ❑ 17. Tribal Rights. No NWP activity may cause more than comply with applicable FEMA-approved state or local minimal adverse effects on tribal rights(including treaty rights), floodplain management requirements. protected tribal resources,or tribal lands. ❑ 11. Equipment.Heavy equipment working in wetlands or ❑ 18. Endangered Species. mudflats must be placed on mats,or other measures must be ❑ (a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which taken to minimize soil disturbance. is likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued ❑ 12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls.Appropriate soil existence of a threatened or endangered species or a erosion and sediment controls must be used and maintained in species proposed for such designation,as identified under effective operating condition during construction,and all the Federal Endangered Species Act(ESA), or which will exposed soil and other fills,as well as any work below the directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the ordinary high water mark or high tide line,must be permanently critical habitat of such species.No activity is authorized stabilized at the earliest practicable date.Permittees are under any NWP which "may affect" a listed species or encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States critical habitat,unless ESA section 7 consultation during periods of low-flow or no-flow,or during low tides. addressing the effects of the proposed activity has been Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 3 completed.Direct effects are the immediate effects on trap,capture,or collect,or to attempt to engage in any listed species and critical habitat caused by the NWP such conduct. The word "harm" in the definition of activity. Indirect effects are those effects on listed species "take" means an act which actually kills or injures and critical habitat that are caused by the NWP activity wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat and are later in time,but still are reasonably certain to modification or degradation where it actually kills or occur. injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential ❑ (b) Federal agencies should follow their own behavioral patterns,including breeding,feeding or procedures for complying with the requirements of the sheltering. ESA.If preconstruction notification is required for the ❑ (f) f the non-federal permittee has a valid ESA proposed activity,the Federal permittee must provide the section 10(a)(1)(B)incidental take permit with an district engineer with the appropriate documentation to approved Habitat Conservation Plan for a project or a demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The group of projects that includes the proposed NWP district engineer will verify that the appropriate activity,the non-federal applicant should provide a copy documentation has been submitted.If the appropriate of that ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit with the PCN documentation has not been submitted,additional ESA required by paragraph(c)of this general condition. The section 7 consultation may be necessary for the activity district engineer will coordinate with the agency that and the respective federal agency would be responsible issued the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit to determine for fulfilling its obligation under section 7 of the ESA. whether the proposed NWP activity and the associated ❑ (c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre- incidental take were considered in the internal ESA construction notification to the district engineer if any section 7 consultation conducted for the ESA section listed species or designated critical habitat might be 10(a)(1)(B)permit.If that coordination results in affected or is in the vicinity of the activity,or if the concurrence from the agency that the proposed NWP activity is located in designated critical habitat,and shall activity and the associated incidental take were not begin work on the activity until notified by the district considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation for engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit,the district engineer satisfied and that the activity is authorized.For activities does not need to conduct a separate ESA section 7 that might affect Federally-listed endangered or consultation for the proposed NWP activity. The district threatened species or designated critical habitat,the pre- engineer will notify the non-federal applicant within 45 construction notification must include the name(s)of the days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification endangered or threatened species that might be affected whether the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit covers the by the proposed activity or that utilize the designated proposed NWP activity or whether additional ESA critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed section 7 consultation is required. activity. The district engineer will determine whether the ❑ (g) Information on the location of threatened and proposed activity"may affect" or will have "no effect" endangered species and their critical habitat can be to listed species and designated critical habitat and will obtained directly from the offices of the FWS and NMFS notify the non-Federal applicant of the Corps' or their world wide Web pages at http://www.fws.gov/or determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre- http://www.fws.gov/ipac and construction notification.In cases where the non-Federal http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/respectively. applicant has identified listed species or critical habitat ❑ 19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. The that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, permittee is responsible for ensuring their action complies with and has so notified the Corps,the applicant shall not the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle begin work until the Corps has provided notification that Protection Act. The permittee is responsible for contacting the proposed activity will have "no effect" on listed appropriate local office of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service to species or critical habitat,or until ESA section 7 consultation has been completed. If the non-Federal determine applicable measures to reduce impacts to migratory applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 birds or eagles,including whether"incidental take"permits are days,the applicant must still wait for notification from the necessary and available under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act for a particular activity. Corps. ❑ (d) As a result of formal or informal consultation ❑ 20. Historic Properties. with the FWS or NMFS the district engineer may add ❑ (a) In cases where the district engineer determines species specific permit conditions to the NWPs. that the activity may have the potential to cause effects to ❑ (e) Authorization of an activity by an NWP does not properties listed,or eligible for listing,in the National authorize the "take" of a threatened or endangered Register of Historic Places,the activity is not authorized, species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of until the requirements of Section 106 of the National separate authorization(e.g.,an ESA Section 10 Permit,a Historic Preservation Act(NHPA)have been satisfied. Biological Opinion with "incidental take"provisions, ❑ (b) Federal permittees should follow their own etc.)from the FWS or the NMFS,the Endangered Species procedures for complying with the requirements of Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If United States to take a listed species,where "take" pre-construction notification is required for the proposed means to harass,harm,pursue,hunt,shoot,wound,kill, NWP activity,the Federal permittee must provide the Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 4 district engineer with the appropriate documentation to engineer will notify the non-Federal applicant that he or demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The she cannot begin the activity until section 106 district engineer will verify that the appropriate consultation is completed. If the non-Federal applicant documentation has been submitted.If the appropriate has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days,the documentation is not submitted,then additional applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps. consultation under section 106 may be necessary. The ❑ (e) Prospective permittees should be aware that respective federal agency is responsible for fiilfilling its section 1 l0k of the NHPA(54 U.S.C.306113)prevents obligation to comply with section 106. the Corps from granting a permit or other assistance to an ❑ (c) Non-federal pennittees must submit a pre- applicant who,with intent to avoid the requirements of construction notification to the district engineer if the section 106 of the NHPA,has intentionally significantly NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to adversely affected a historic property to which the permit any historic properties listed on,determined to be eligible would relate,or having legal power to prevent it,allowed for listing on,or potentially eligible for listing on the such significant adverse effect to occur,unless the Corps, National Register of Historic Places,including previously after consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic unidentified properties.For such activities,the Preservation(ACHP),detennines that circumstances preconstruction notification must state which historic justify granting such assistance despite the adverse effect properties might have the potential to be affected by the created or pernlitted by the applicant. If circumstances proposed NWP activity or include a vicinity map justify granting the assistance,the Corps is required to indicating the location of the historic properties or the notify the ACNP and provide documentation specifying potential for the presence of historic properties. the circumstances,the degree of damage to the integrity Assistance regarding information on the location of,or of any historic properties affected,and proposed potential for,the presence of historic properties can be mitigation.This documentation must include any views sought from the State Historic Preservation Officer,Tribal obtained from the applicant, SHPO/THPO, appropriate Historic Preservation Officer,or designated tribal Indian tribes if the undertaking occurs on or affects representative,as appropriate,and the National Register historic properties on tribal lands or affects properties of of Historic Places(see 33 CFR 330.4(g)).When interest to those tribes,and other parties known to have a reviewing pre-construction notifications,district legitimate interest in the impacts to the permitted activity engineers will comply with the current procedures for on historic properties. addressing the requirements of section 106 of the National ❑ 21. Discovery of Previously Unknown Remains and Historic Preservation Act. The district engineer shall Artifacts. If you discover any previously unknown historic, make a reasonable and good faith effort to carry out cultural or archeological remains and artifacts while appropriate identification efforts,which may include background research,consultation,oral history accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit,you must interviews,sample field investigation,and field survey. immediately notify the district engineer of what you have found, Based on the information submitted in the PCN and these and to the maximum extent practicable,avoid construction identification efforts,the district engineer shall determine activities that may affect the remains and artifacts until the whether the proposed NWP activity has the potential to required coordination has been completed. The district engineer cause effects on the historic properties. Section 106 will initiate the Federal,Tribal,and state coordination required consultation is not required when the district engineer to determine if the items or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of determines that the activity does not have the potential to Historic Places. cause effects on historic properties(see 36 CFR 800.3(a)). Section 106 consultation is required when the district ❑ 22. Designated Critical Resource Waters.Designated engineer determines that the activity has the potential to Critical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include, cause effects on historic properties.The district engineer NOAA-managed marine sanctuaries and marine monuments, will conduct consultation with consulting parties and National Estuarine Research Reserves. The district engineer identified under 36 CFR 800.2(c)when he or she makes may designate,after notice and opportunity for public comment, any of the following effect determinations for the additional waters officially designated by a state as having purposes of section 106 of the NHPA:no historic particular environmental or ecological significance,such as properties affected,no adverse effect,or adverse effect. outstanding national resource waters or state natural heritage Where the non-Federal applicant has identified historic sites.The district engineer may also designate additional critical properties on which the activity might have the potential resource waters after notice and opportunity for public comment. to cause effects and so notified the Corps,the non-Federal ❑ (a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters applicant shall not begin the activity until notified by the district engineer either that the activity has no potential to of the United States are not authorized by NWPs 7, l 2, cause effects to historic properties or that NHPA section 14, l 6, 17,2l,29,3l,35,39,40,42,43,44,49, 50,5 1, 106 consultation has been completed. and 52 for any activity within,or directly affecting, critical resource waters,including wetlands adjacent to ❑ (d) For non-federal permittees,the district engineer such waters. will notify the prospective permittee within 45 days of ❑ (b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19,22,23,25,27, receipt of a complete pre-construction notification 28,30,33,34,36,37,38,and 54,notification is required whether NHPA section 106 consultation is required. If NHPA section 106 consultation is required,the district in accordance with general condition 32,for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 5 including wetlands adjacent to those waters.The district will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only (e.g.,riparian areas and/or wetlands compensation)based after it is determined that the impacts to the critical on what is best for the aquatic environment on a resource waters will be no more than minimal. watershed basis. In cases where riparian areas are ❑ 23. Mitigation. The district engineer will consider the determined to be the most appropriate form of following factors when determining appropriate and practicable minimization or compensatory mitigation,the district engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provide mitigation necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland losses. adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal: ❑ (a) The activity must be designed and constructed to ❑ (f) Compensatory mitigation projects provided to avoid and minimize adverse effects,both temporary and offset losses of aquatic resources must comply with the permanent,to waters of the United States to the maximum applicable provisions of 33 CFR part 332. extent practicable at the project site(i.e.,on site). ❑ (1) The prospective permittee is responsible for ❑ (b) Mitigation in all its forms(avoiding,minimizing, proposing an appropriate compensatory mitigation rectifying,reducing,or compensating for resource losses) option if compensatory mitigation is necessary to will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the ensure that the activity results in no more than individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects minimal adverse environmental effects. For the are no more than minimal. NWPs,the preferred mechanism for providing compensatory mitigation is mitigation bank credits or ❑ (c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for- in-lieu fee program credits(see 33 CFR 332.3(b)(2) one ratio will be required for all wetland losses that and(3)).However,if an appropriate number and type exceed 1/10-acre and require preconstruction notification, of mitigation bank or in-lieu credits are not available unless the district engineer determines in writing that at the time the PCN is submitted to the district either some other form of mitigation would be more engineer,the district engineer may approve the use of environmentally appropriate or the adverse environmental permittee-responsible mitigation. effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal, ❑ (2) The amount of compensatory mitigation and provides an activity-specific waiver of this required by the district engineer must be sufficient to requirement.For wetland losses of 1/10-acre or less that ensure that the authorized activity results in no more require preconstruction notification,the district engineer than minimal individual and cumulative adverse may determine on a case-by-case basis that compensatory environmental effects(see 33 CFR 330.1(e)(3)). (See mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results in also 33 CFR 332.3(f)), only minimal adverse environmental effects. ❑ (d) For losses of strearns or other open waters that ❑ (3) Since the likelihood of success is greater and require pre-construction notification,the district engineer the impacts to potentially valuable uplands are may require compensatory mitigation to ensure that the reduced,aquatic resource restoration should be the activity results in no more than minimal adverse first compensatory mitigation option considered for environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation for permittee-responsible mitigation. losses of streams should be provided,if practicable, ❑ (4) If permittee-responsible mitigation is the through stream rehabilitation,enhancement,or proposed option,the prospective permittee is preservation,since streams are difficult-to-replace responsible for submitting a mitigation plan.A resources(see 33 CFR 332.3(e)(3)). conceptual or detailed mitigation plan may be used ❑ (e) Compensatory mitigation plans for NWP by the district engineer to make the decision on the activities in or near streams or other open waters will NWP verification request,but a final mitigation plan normally include a requirement for the restoration or that addresses the applicable requirements of 33 CFR enhancement,maintenance,and legal protection(e.g., 332.4(c)(2)through(14)must be approved by the conservation easements)of riparian areas next to open district engineer before the pennittee begins work in waters. In some cases,the restoration or waters of the United States, unless the district maintenance/protection of riparian areas may be the only engineer determines that prior approval of the final compensatory mitigation required. Restored riparian areas mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to should consist of native species.The width of the required ensure timely completion of the required riparian area will address documented water quality or compensatory mitigation(see 33 CFR 332.3(k)(3)). aquatic habitat loss concerns.Normally,the riparian area ❑ (5) If mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream,but credits are the proposed option,the mitigation plan the district engineer may require slightly wider riparian only needs to address the baseline conditions at the areas to address documented water quality or habitat loss impact site and the number of credits to be provided. concerns.If it is not possible to restore or maintain/protect a riparian area on both sides of a stream,or if the El (6) Compensatory mitigation requirements(e.g., resource type and amount to be provided as waterbody is a lake or coastal waters,then restoring or maintaining/protecting a riparian area along a single bank compensatory mitigation,site protection,ecological performance standards,monitoring requirements) or shoreline may be sufficient.Where both wetlands and open waters exist on the project site,the district engineer may be addressed through conditions added to the Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 6 NWP authorization,instead of components of a zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained,or compensatory mitigation plan(see 33 CFR a presumption of concurrence must occur(see 33 CFR 330.4(d)). 332.4(c)(1)(ii)). The district engineer or a State may require additional measures ❑ (g) Compensatory mitigation will not be used to to ensure that the authorized activity is consistent with state coastal zone management requirements. increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of the NWPs.For example,if an NWP has an acreage ❑ 27. Regional and Case-By-Case Conditions.The activity limit of 1/2-acre,it cannot be used to authorize any NWP must comply with any regional conditions that may have been activity resulting in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of added by the Division Engineer(see 33 CFR 330.4(e))and with waters of the United States,even if compensatory any case specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state, mitigation is provided that replaces or restores some of Indian Tribe,or U.S. EPA in its section 401 Water Quality the lost waters. However,compensatory mitigation can Certification,or by the state in its Coastal Zone Management and should be used,as necessary,to ensure that an NWP Act consistency determination. activity already meeting the established acreage limits ❑ 28. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. The use of also satisfies the no more than minimal impact more than one NWP for a single and complete project is requirement for the NWPs. prohibited,except when the acreage loss of waters of the United ❑ (h)Permittees may propose the use of mitigation States authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit banks,in-lieu fee programs,or permittee-responsible of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit.For mitigation.When developing a compensatory mitigation example,if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed under proposal,the permittee must consider appropriate and NWP 14,with associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP practicable options consistent with the framework at 33 13,the maximum acreage loss of waters of the United States for CFR 332.3(b).For activities resulting in the loss of the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre. marine or estuarine resources,permittee-responsible ❑ 29. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications.If the mitigation may be environmentally preferable if there are permittee sells the property associated with a nationwide permit no mitigation banks or in-lieu fee programs in the area verification,the permittee may transfer the nationwide permit that have marine or estuarine credits available for sale or verification to the new owner by submitting a letter to the transfer to the permittee.For permittee-responsible appropriate Corps district office to validate the transfer. A copy mitigation,the special conditions of the NWP verification must clearly indicate the party or parties responsible for of the nationwide permit verification must be attached to the the implementation and performance of the compensatory letter,and the letter must contain the following statement and mitigation project,and,if required,its long-tern signature: management. When the structures or work authorized by this ❑ (i) Where certain functions and services of waters of nationwide permit are still in existence at the time the United States are permanently adversely affected by a the property is transferred,the terms and conditions regulated activity, such as discharges of dredged or fill of this nationwide permit,including any special material into waters of the United States that will convert conditions,will continue to be binding on the new a forested or scrub-shrub wetland to a herbaceous wetland owner(s)of the property.To validate the transfer of in a permanently maintained utility line right-of-way, this nationwide permit and the associated liabilities mitigation may be required to reduce the adverse associated with compliance with its terns and environmental effects of the activity to the no more than conditions,have the transferee sign and date below. minimallevel. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ❑ 24. Safety of Impoundment Structures. To ensure that all (Transferee) impoundment structures are safely designed,the district engineer ---------------------------------------------------------------- may require non-Federal applicants to demonstrate that the (Date) structures comply with established state dam safety criteria or have been designed by qualified persons.The district engineer ❑ 30. Compliance Certification.Each permittee who may also require documentation that the design has been receives an NWP verification letter from the Corps must provide independently reviewed by similarly qualified persons,and a signed certification documenting completion of the authorized appropriate modifications made to ensure safety. activity and implementation of any required compensatory ❑ 25. Water Quality.Where States and authorized Tribes,or mitigation. The success of any required permittee-responsible EPA where applicable,have not previously certified compliance mitigation,including the achievement of ecological performance of an NWP with CWA section 401,individual 401 Water standards,will be addressed separately by the district engineer. Quality Certification must be obtained or waived(see 33 CFR The Corps will provide the permittee the certification document 330.4(c)). The district engineer or State or Tribe may require with the NWP verification letter.The certification document will additional water quality management measures to ensure that the include: authorized activity does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality. El (a) A statement that the authorized activity was done in accordance with the NWP authorization,including any ❑ 26. Coastal Zone Management. In coastal states where an general,regional,or activity-specific conditions; NWP has not previously received a state coastal zone management consistency concurrence,an individual state coastal Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 7 ❑ (b) A statement that the implementation of any species or critical habitat might be affected or are in required compensatory mitigation was completed in the vicinity of the activity,or to notify the Corps accordance with the permit conditions.If credits from a pursuant to general condition 20 that the activity mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program are used to satisfy might have the potential to cause effects to historic the compensatory mitigation requirements,the properties,the permittee cannot begin the activity certification must include the documentation required by until receiving written notification from the Corps 33 CFR 332.3(1)(3)to confinn that the permittee secured that there is "no effect" on listed species or"no the appropriate number and resource type of credits; and potential to cause effects" on historic properties,or ❑ (c) The signature of the permittee certifying the that any consultation required under Section 7 of the completion of the activity and mitigation. The completed Endangered Species Act(see 33 CFR 330.4(f)) certification document must be submitted to the district and/or section 106 of the National Historic engineer within 30 days of completion of the authorized Preservation Act(see 33 CFR 330.4(g))has been activity or the implementation of any required completed.Also,work cannot begin under NWPs 21, compensatory mitigation,whichever occurs later. 49,or 50 until the pennittee has received written approval from the Corps.If the proposed activity ❑ 31. Activities Affecting Structures or Works Built by requires a written waiver to exceed specified limits of the United States.If an NWP activity also requires permission an NWP,the pennittee may not begin the activity from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C.408 because it will alter or until the district engineer issues the waiver.If the temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S.Army Corps of district or division engineer notifies the pennittee in Engineers(USACE)federally authorized Civil Works project(a writing that an individual permit is required within 45 "USACE project"),the prospective permittee must submit a calendar days of receipt of a complete PCN,the preconstruction notification. See paragraph(b)(10)of general permittee cannot begin the activity until an individual condition 32.An activity that requires section 408 permission is permit has been obtained. Subsequently,the not authorized by NWP until the appropriate Corps office issues permittee's right to proceed under the NWP may be the section 408 permission to alter,occupy,or use the USACE modified,suspended,or revoked only in accordance project,and the district engineer issues a written NWP with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d)(2). verification. ❑ (b) Contents of Pre-Construction Notification: The PCN must be in writing and include the following ❑ 32. Pre-Construction Notification. information: ❑ (a) Timing.Where required by the terms of the ❑ (1) Name,address and telephone numbers of NWP,the prospective pennittee must notify the district the prospective pennittee; engineer by submitting a pre-construction notification ❑ (2) Location of the proposed activity; (PCN)as early as possible.The district engineer must ❑ (3) Identify the specific NWP or NWP(s)the determine if the PCN is complete within 30 calendar days prospective permittee wants to use to authorize the of the date of receipt and, if the PCN is determined to be proposed activity; incomplete,notify the prospective permittee within that 30 day period to request the additional information ❑ (4) A description of the proposed activity;the necessary to make the PCN complete. The request must activity's purpose;direct and indirect adverse specify the information needed to make the PCN environmental effects the activity would cause, complete. As a general rule,district engineers will request including the anticipated amount of loss of wetlands, additional information necessary to make the PCN other special aquatic sites,and other waters expected complete only once.However,if the prospective to result from the NWP activity,in acres,linear feet, pennittee does not provide all of the requested or other appropriate unit of measure;a description of information,then the district engineer will notify the any proposed mitigation measures intended to reduce prospective pennittee that the PCN is still incomplete and the adverse environmental effects caused by the the PCN review process will not commence until all of proposed activity; and any other NWP(s),regional the requested information has been received by the district general permit(s),or individual permit(s)used or engineer.The prospective permittee shall not begin the intended to be used to authorize any part of the activity until either: proposed project or any related activity, including ❑ (1) He or she is notified in writing by the other separate and distant crossings for linear projects district engineer that the activity may proceed under that require Department of the Army authorization the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the but do not require pre-construction notification. The district or division engineer;or description of the proposed activity and any proposed mitigation measures should be sufficiently detailed to ❑ (2) 45 calendar days have passed from the allow the district engineer to detennine that the district engineer's receipt of the complete PCN and adverse environmental effects of the activity will be the prospective permittee has not received written no more than minimal and to determine the need for notice from the district or division engineer. compensatory mitigation or other mitigation However,if the permittee was required to notify the measures.For single and complete linear projects,the Corps pursuant to general condition 18 that listed PCN must include the quantity of anticipated losses of wetlands,other special aquatic sites, and other Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 8 waters for each single and complete crossing of those ❑ (9) For an activity that will occur in a wetlands,other special aquatic sites,and other component of the National Wild and Scenic River waters. Sketches should be provided when necessary System,or in a river officially designated by to show that the activity complies with the terms of Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the NWP. (Sketches usually clarify the activity and the system while the river is in an official study when provided results in a quicker decision. Sketches status,the PCN must identify the Wild and Scenic should contain sufficient detail to provide an River or the "study river" (see general condition illustrative description of the proposed activity(e.g., 16);and a conceptual plan),but do not need to be detailed ❑ (10) For an activity that requires permission engineering plans); from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C.408 because it ❑ (5) The PCN must include a delineation of will alter or temporarily or permanently occupy or wetlands,other special aquatic sites,and other use a U.S.Army Corps of Engineers federally waters, such as lakes and ponds,and perennial, authorized civil works project,the pre-construction intermittent,and ephemeral streams,on the project notification must include a statement confirming that site.Wetland delineations must be prepared in the project proponent has submitted a written request accordance with the current method required by the for section 408 permission from the Corps office Corps.The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate having jurisdiction over that USACE project. the special aquatic sites and other waters on the ❑ (c) Form of Pre-Construction Notification: The project site,but there may be a delay if the Corps does the delineation,especially if the project site is standard individual permit application form(Foran ENG large or contains many wetlands,other special 4345)may be used,but the completed application form aquatic sites,and other waters.Furthermore,the 45 must clearly indicate that it is an NWP PCN and must day period will not start until the delineation has been include all of the applicable information required in submitted to or completed by the Corps,as paragraphs(b)(1)through(10)of this general condition. A letter containing the required information may also be appropriate; used. Applicants may provide electronic files of PCNs ❑ (6) If the proposed activity will result in the and supporting materials if the district engineer has loss of greater than V10-acre of wetlands and a PCN established tools and procedures for electronic submittals. is required,the prospective permittee must submit a ❑ (d) Agency Coordination: statement describing how the mitigation requirement will be satisfied,or explaining why the adverse ❑ (1) The district engineer will consider any environmental effects are no more than minimal and comments from Federal and state agencies why compensatory mitigation should not be required. concerning the proposed activity's compliance with As an alternative,the prospective permittee may the terms and conditions of the NWPs and the need submit a conceptual or detailed mitigation plan. for mitigation to reduce the activity's adverse ❑ (7) For non-Federal permittees,if any listed environmental effects so that they are no more than species or designated critical habitat might be minimal. affected or is in the vicinity of the activity,or if the ❑ (2) Agency coordination is required for: (i)All activity is located in designated critical habitat,the NWP activities that require pre-construction PCN must include the name(s)of those endangered notification and result in the loss of greater than 12- or threatened species that might be affected by the acre of waters of the United States; (ii)NWP 21,29, proposed activity or utilize the designated critical 39,40,42,43,44,50,51,and 52 activities that habitat that might be affected by the proposed require pre-construction notification and will result in activity.For NWP activities that require pre- the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of stream bed; construction notification,Federal permittees must (iii)NWP 13 activities in excess of 500 linear feet, provide documentation demonstrating compliance fills greater than one cubic yard per running foot,or with the Endangered Species Act; involve discharges of dredged or fill material into ❑ (8) For non-Federal permittees,if the NWP special aquatic sites; and(iv)NWP 54 activities in activity might have the potential to cause effects to a excess of 500 linear feet,or that extend into the historic property listed on,determined to be eligible waterbody more than 30 feet from the mean low for listing on,or potentially eligible for listing on,the water line in tidal waters or the ordinary high water National Register of Historic Places,the PCN must mark in the Great Lakes. state which historic property might have the potential ❑ (3) When agency coordination is required,the to be affected by the proposed activity or include a district engineer will immediately provide(e.g.,via vicinity map indicating the location of the historic email,facsimile transmission,overnight mail,or property. For NWP activities that require pre- other expeditious manner)a copy of the complete construction notification,Federal permittees must PCN to the appropriate Federal or state offices(FWS, provide documentation demonstrating compliance state natural resource or water quality agency,EPA, with section 106 of the National Historic Preservation and,if appropriate,the NMFS).With the exception of Act; NWP 37,these agencies will have 10 calendar days from the date the material is transmitted to notify the Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 9 district engineer via telephone,facsimile provided for in NWPs 13,21,29,36, 39,40,42,43,44,50, transmission,or email that they intend to provide 51,52,or 54,the district engineer will only grant the waiver substantive,site-specific comments. The comments upon a written determination that the NWP activity will result must explain why the agency believes the adverse in only minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects will be more than minimal.If environmental effects.For those NWPs that have a waivable so contacted by an agency,the district engineer will 300 linear foot limit for losses of intermittent and ephemeral wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a stream bed and a 12-acre limit(i.e.,NWPs 21,29,39,40,42, decision on the preconstruction notification. The 43,44,50,51,and 52),the loss of intermittent and ephemeral district engineer will fully consider agency comments stream bed,plus any other losses of jurisdictional waters and received within the specified time frame concerning wetlands,cannot exceed 12-acre. the proposed activity's compliance with the terms ❑ 2. When making minimal adverse environmental effects and conditions of the NWPs,including the need for mitigation to ensure the net adverse environmental determinations the district engineer will consider the direct effects of the proposed activity are no more than and indirect effects caused by the NWP activity. He or she minimal.The district engineer will provide no will also consider the cumulative adverse environmental response to the resource agency,except as provided effects caused by activities authorized by NWP and whether below.The district engineer will indicate in the those cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more administrative record associated with each pre- than minimal. The district engineer will also consider site construction notification that the resource agencies' specific factors,such as the environmental setting in the concerns were considered.For NWP 37,the vicinity of the NWP activity,the type of resource that will be emergency watershed protection and rehabilitation affected by the NWP activity,the functions provided by the activity may proceed immediately in cases where aquatic resources that will be affected by the NWP activity, there is an unacceptable hazard to life or a significant the degree or magnitude to which the aquatic resources loss of property or economic hardship will occur. The Perform those functions,the extent that aquatic resource district engineer will consider any comments functions will be lost as a result of the NWP activity(e.g., received to decide whether the NWP 37 authorization Partial or complete loss),the duration of the adverse effects should be modified,suspended,or revoked in (temporary or permanent),the importance of the aquatic accordance with the procedures at 33 CFR 330.5. resource functions to the region(e.g.,watershed or ecoregion), and mitigation required by the district engineer. If an ❑ (4) In cases of where the prospective permittee appropriate functional or condition assessment method is is not a Federal agency,the district engineer will available and practicable to use,that assessment method may provide a response to NMFS within 30 calendar days be used by the district engineer to assist in the minimal of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat conservation adverse environmental effects determination. The district recommendations,as required by section engineer may add case-specific special conditions to the NWP 305(b)(4)(B)of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery authorization to address site-specific environmental concerns. Conservation and Management Act. ❑ 3. If the proposed activity requires a PCN and will ❑ (4) Applicants are encouraged to provide the result in a loss of greater than IAO-acre of wetlands,the Corps with either electronic files or multiple copies prospective permittee should submit a mitigation proposal of preconstruction notifications to expedite agency with the PCN.Applicants may also propose compensatory coordination. mitigation for NWP activities with smaller impacts,or for C. District Engineer's Decision impacts to other types of waters(e.g.,streams). The district engineer will consider any proposed compensatory mitigation ❑ 1. In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity,the or other mitigation measures the applicant has included in the district engineer will determine whether the activity authorized proposal in determining whether the net adverse by the NWP will result in more than minimal individual or environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary than minimal. The compensatory mitigation proposal may be to the public interest. If a project proponent requests either conceptual or detailed. If the district engineer authorization by a specific NWP,the district engineer should determines that the activity complies with the terms and issue the NWP verification for that activity if it meets the conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental terms and conditions of that NWP,unless he or she effects are no more than minimal,after considering mitigation, determines,after considering mitigation,that the proposed the district engineer will notify the permittee and include any activity will result in more than minimal individual and activity-specific conditions in the NWP verification the district cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment and engineer deems necessary.Conditions for compensatory other aspects of the public interest and exercises discretionary mitigation requirements must comply with the appropriate authority to require an individual permit for the proposed provisions at 33 CFR 332.3(k).The district engineer must activity. For a linear project,this determination will include an approve the final mitigation plan before the permittee evaluation of the individual crossings of waters of the United commences work in waters of the United States, unless the States to determine whether they individually satisfy the terms district engineer determines that prior approval of the final and conditions of the NWP(s),as well as the cumulative mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure effects caused by all of the crossings authorized by NWP. If timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation. If an applicant requests a waiver of the 300 linear foot limit on the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory impacts to streams or of an otherwise applicable limit,as mitigation plan with the PCN,the district engineer will Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 10 expeditiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation development.BMPs are categorized as structural or non- plan. The district engineer must review the proposed structural. compensatory mitigation plan within 45 calendar days of Compensatory mitigation: The restoration(re-establishment receiving a complete PCN and determine whether the or rehabilitation),establishment(creation),enhancement, proposed mitigation would ensure the NWP activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. If the and/or in certain circumstances preservation of aquatic net adverse environmental effects of the NWP activity(after resources for the purposes of offsetting unavoidable adverse consideration of the mitigation proposal)are determined by impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable the district engineer to be no more than minimal,the district avoidance and minimization has been achieved. engineer will provide a timely written response to the Currently serviceable: Useable as is or with some applicant.The response will state that the NWP activity can maintenance,but not so degraded as to essentially require proceed under the terms and conditions of the NWP,including reconstruction. any activity-specific conditions added to the NWP authorization by the district engineer. Direct effects:Effects that are caused by the activity and occur at the same time and place. ❑ 4. If the district engineer determines that the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are more than Discharge: The term"discharge" means any discharge of minimal,then the district engineer will notify the applicant dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. either: (a)That the activity does not qualify for authorization Ecological reference:A model used to plan and design an under the NWP and instruct the applicant on the procedures to aquatic habitat and riparian area restoration,enhancement,or seek authorization under an individual permit; (b)that the establishment activity under NWP 27.An ecological reference activity is authorized under the NWP subject to the applicant's may be based on the structure,functions,and dynamics of an submission of a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse aquatic habitat type or a riparian area type that currently exists environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal; in the region where the proposed NWP 27 activity is located. or(c)that the activity is authorized under the NWP with Alternatively,an ecological reference may be based on a specific modifications or conditions.Where the district conceptual model for the aquatic habitat type or riparian area engineer determines that mitigation is required to ensure no type to be restored,enhanced,or established as a result of the more than minimal adverse environmental effects,the activity proposed NWP 27 activity.An ecological reference takes into will be authorized within the 45-day PCN period(unless account the range of variation of the aquatic habitat type or additional time is required to comply with general conditions riparian area type in the region. 18,20,and/or 31,or to evaluate PCNs for activities authorized by NWPs 21,49,and 50),with activity-specific conditions Enhancement: The manipulation of the physical,chemical,or biological characteristics of an aquatic resource to heighten, that state the mitigation requirements.The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or detailed mitigation plan or intensify,or improve a specific aquatic resource function(s). Enhancement results in the gain of selected aquatic resource a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse environmental effects so that they function(s),but may also lead to a decline in other aquatic are no more than minimal.When compensatory mitigation is resource ion(s). Enhancement does not result in a gain in required,no work in waters of the United States may occur aquatic resource area. until the district engineer has approved a specific mitigation Ephemeral stream:An ephemeral stream has flowing water plan or has determined that prior approval of a final mitigation only during,and for a short duration after,precipitation events plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely in a typical year. Ephemeral stream beds are located above the completion of the required compensatory mitigation. water table year-round. Groundwater is not a source of water D. Further Information for the stream.Runoff from rainfall is the primary source of water for stream flow. 1. District Engineers have authority to determine if an activity complies with the terms and conditions of an NWP. Establishment(creation): The manipulation of the physical, chemical,or biological characteristics present to develop an 2. NWPs do not obviate the need to obtain other federal, aquatic resource that did not previously exist at an upland site. state,or local permits,approvals,or authorizations required by Establishment results in a gain in aquatic resource area. law. High Tide Line: The line of intersection of the land with the 3. NWPs do not grant any property rights or exclusive water's surface at the maximum height reached by a rising privileges. tide. The high tide line may be determined,in the absence of 4. NWPs do not authorize any injury to the property or actual data,by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a rights of others. more or less continuous deposit of fine shell or debris on the foreshore or berm,other physical markings or characteristics, 5. NWPs do not authorize interference with any existing or vegetation lines,tidal gages,or other suitable means that proposed Federal project(see general condition 31). delineate the general height reached by a rising tide. The line E. Definitions encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but does not include storm surges in Best management practices(BMPs):Policies,practices, which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach procedures,or structures implemented to mitigate the adverse of the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by environmental effects on surface water quality resulting from Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page I I strong winds such as those accompanying a hurricane or other Open water:For purposes of the NWPs,an open water is any intense storm. area that in a year with normal patterns of precipitation has Historic Property: Any prehistoric or historic district,site water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that an (including archaeological site),building,structure,or other ordinary high water mark can be determined.Aquatic object included in,or eligible for inclusion in,the National vegetation within the area of flowing or standing water is Register of Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the either non-emergent, sparse,or absent.Vegetated shallows are Interior.This term includes artifacts,records,and remains that considered to be open waters.Examples of"open waters" are related to and located within such properties. The term include rivers,streams,lakes,and ponds. includes properties of traditional religious and cultural Ordinary High Water Mark:An ordinary high water mark is importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization a line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and and that meet the National Register criteria(36 CFR part 60). indicated by physical characteristics,or by other appropriate Independent utility:A test to determine what constitutes a means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding single and complete non-linear project in the Corps areas. Regulatory Program.A project is considered to have Perennial stream:A perennial stream has flowing water year- independent utility if it would be constructed absent the round during a typical year. The water table is located above construction of other projects in the project area.Portions of a the stream bed for most of the year.Groundwater is the multi-phase project that depend upon other phases of the primary source of water for stream flow.Runoff from rainfall project do not have independent utility.Phases of a project is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. that would be constructed even if the other phases were not Practicable:Available and capable of being done after taking built can be considered as separate single and complete projects with independent utility. into consideration cost,existing technology,and logistics in light of overall project purposes. Indirect effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and are later in time or farther removed in distance,but are still Pre-construction notification:A request submitted by the reasonably foreseeable. project proponent to the Corps for confirmation that a particular activity is authorized by nationwide pen-nit. The Intermittent stream:An intermittent stream has flowing request may be a permit application,letter,or similar water during certain times of the year,when groundwater document that includes infortnation about the proposed work provides water for stream flow. During dry periods, and its anticipated environmental effects.Preconstruction intermittent streams may not have flowing water.Runoff from notification may be required by the terms and conditions of a rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. nationwide permit,or by regional conditions.A pre- Loss of waters of the United States:Waters of the United construction notification may be voluntarily submitted in cases States that are permanently adversely affected by filling, where preconstruction notification is not required and the flooding,excavation,or drainage because of the regulated project proponent wants confirmation that the activity is activity. Permanent adverse effects include permanent authorized by nationwide permit. discharges of dredged or fill material that change an aquatic Preservation: The removal of a threat to,or preventing the area to dry land, increase the bottom elevation of a waterbody, decline of,aquatic resources by an action in or near those or change the use of a waterbody.The acreage of loss of aquatic resources. This term includes activities commonly waters of the United States is a threshold measurement of the associated with the protection and maintenance of aquatic impact to jurisdictional waters for determining whether a resources through the implementation of appropriate legal and project may qualify for an NWP;it is not a net threshold that physical mechanisms.Preservation does not result in a gain of is calculated after considering compensatory mitigation that aquatic resource area or functions. may be used to offset losses of aquatic functions and set-vices. Protected tribal resources: Those natural resources and The loss of stream bed includes the acres or linear feet of properties of traditional or customary religious or cultural stream bed that are filled or excavated as a result of the importance,either on or off Indian lands,retained by,or regulated activity.Waters of the United States temporarily reserved by or for,Indian tribes through treaties, statutes, filled,flooded,excavated,or drained,but restored to pre- consttuction contours and elevations after construction,are not judicial decisions,or executive orders,including tribal trust included in the measurement of loss of waters of the United resources. States.Impacts resulting from activities that do not require Re-establishment: The manipulation of the physical, Department of the Army authorization,such as activities chemical,or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of eligible for exemptions under section 404(f)of the Clean returning natural/historic functions to a former aquatic Water Act,are not considered when calculating the loss of resource.Reestablishment results in rebuilding a former waters of the United States.Navigable waters:Waters subject aquatic resource and results in a gain in aquatic resource area to section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.These and functions. waters are defined at 33 CFR part 329. Rehabilitation: The manipulation of the physical,chemical, Non-tidal wetland: A non-tidal wetland is a wetland that is or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing not subject to the ebb and flow of tidal waters.Nontidal natural/historic functions to a degraded aquatic resource. wetlands contiguous to tidal waters are located landward of Rehabilitation results in a gain in aquatic resource function, the high tide line(i.e.,spring high tide line). but does not result in a gain in aquatic resource area. Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 12 Restoration: The manipulation of the physical,chemical,or of reducing downstream erosion,water quality degradation, biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning and flooding and mitigating the adverse effects of changes in natural/historic functions to a former or degraded aquatic land use on the aquatic environment. resource. For the purpose of tracking net gains in aquatic resource area,restoration is divided into two categories: Stormwater management facilities: Stormwater Reestablishment and rehabilitation. management facilities are those facilities,including but not limited to,Stormwater retention and detention ponds and best Riffle and pool complex: Riffle and pool complexes are management practices,which retain water for a period of time special aquatic sites under the 404(b)(1)Guidelines. Riffle and to control runoff and/or improve the quality(i.e.,by reducing pool complexes sometimes characterize steep gradient the concentration of nutrients,sediments,hazardous sections of streams. Such stream sections are recognizable by substances and other pollutants)of stormwater runoff. their hydraulic characteristics. The rapid movement of water over a course substrate in riffles results in a rough flow,a Stream bed: The substrate of the stream channel between the ordinary high water marks. The substrate may be bedrock or turbulent surface,and high dissolved oxygen levels in the water.Pools are deeper areas associated with riffles.A slower inorganic particles that range in size from clay to boulders. Wetlands contiguous to the stream bed,but outside of the stream velocity, a streaming flow,a smooth surface,and a finer substrate characterize pools. ordinary high water marks,are not considered part of the stream bed. Riparian areas: Riparian areas are lands next to streams, lakes,and estuarine-marine shorelines.Riparian areas are Stream ehannelization: The manipulation of a stream's transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, course,condition,capacity,or location that causes more than through which surface and subsurface hydrology connects minimal interruption of normal stream processes.A riverine,lacustrine,estuarine,and marine waters with their channelized stream remains a water of the United States. adjacent wetlands,non-wetland waters,or uplands. Riparian Structure:An object that is arranged in a definite pattern of areas provide a variety of ecological functions and services organization.Examples of structures include,without and help improve or maintain local water quality. (See general limitation,any pier,boat dock,boat ramp,wharf,dolphin, condition 23.) weir,boom,breakwater,bulkhead,revetment,riprap,jetty, Shellfish seeding: The placement of shellfish seed and/or artificial island,artificial reef,permanent mooring structure, suitable substrate to increase shellfish production. Shellfish Power transmission line,permanently moored floating vessel, seed consists of immature individual shellfish or individual piling,aid to navigation,or any other manmade obstacle or shellfish attached to shells or shell fragments(i.e.,spat on obstruction. shell). Suitable substrate may consist of shellfish shells,shell Tidal wetland:A tidal wetland is a jurisdictional wetland that fragments,or other appropriate materials placed into waters is inundated by tidal waters.Tidal waters rise and fall in a for shellfish habitat. predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the Single and complete linear project:A linear project is a gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. Tidal waters end project constructed for the purpose of getting people,goods,or Where the rise and fall of the water surface can no longer be services from a point of origin to a terminal point,which often Practically measured in a predictable rhythm due to masking involves multiple crossings of one or more waterbodies at by other waters,wind,or other effects.Tidal wetlands are separate and distant locations. The term"single and complete Tribal lands:Any lands title to which is either: (1)Held in project"is defined as that portion of the total linear project trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or individual;or(2)held by any Indian tribe or individual subject partnership or other association of owners/developers that to restrictions by the United States against alienation. includes all crossings of a single water of the United States (i.e.,a single waterbody)at a specific location.For linear Tribal rights:Those rights legally accruing to a tribe or tribes projects crossing a single or multiple waterbodies several by virtue of inherent sovereign authority,unextinguished times at separate and distant locations,each crossing is aboriginal title,treaty, statute,judicial decisions,executive corder or agreement,and that give rise to legally enforceable considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization.However,individual channels in a braided remedies. stream or river,or individual arms of a large,irregularly Vegetated shallows: Vegetated shallows are special aquatic shaped wetland or lake,etc.,are not separate waterbodies,and sites under the 404(b)(1)Guidelines. They are areas that are crossings of such features cannot be considered separately. permanently inundated and under normal circumstances have Single and complete non-linear project:For non-linear rooted aquatic vegetation,such as seagrasses in marine and projects,the term"single and complete project"is defined at estuarine systems and a variety of vascular rooted plants in 33 CFR 330.2(1) as the total project proposed or accomplished freshwater systems. by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of Waterbody: For purposes of the NWPs,a waterbody is a owners/developers.A single and complete non-linear project jurisdictional water of the United States.If a wetland is must have independent utility(see definition of"independent adjacent to a waterbody determined to be a water of the United utility"). Single and complete non-linear projects may not be States,that waterbody and any adjacent wetlands are "piecemealed"to avoid the limits in an NWP authorization. considered together as a single aquatic unit(see 33 CFR Stormwater management: Stormwater management is the 328.4(c)(2)).Examples of"waterbodies" include streams, mechanism for controlling stormwater runoff for the purposes rivers,lakes,ponds,and wetlands. Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 13 �� ~�� m�~�^�� 8��~��^�� ~�� 0�� --- - - Regional- ~- ---�' ~-~ Nationwide Permits ~ �� *�� Colorado �� mm�� )��) ��m ��m��|��o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District Omaha District Sacramento District Regional Conditions Applicable to Specific Nationwide Permits within the State of Colorado 1. Nationwide Permit No. 12: Utility Line Activities. Notification to the District Engineer(DE) in accordance with General Condition (GC) No. 32, pre- construction notification (PCN) is required for utility line activities that propose open trenching in perennial waters orfor the purpose of creating a water intake. 2. Nationwide Permit No. 13: Bank Stabilization. PCN is required for bank stabilization activities that are necessary for erosion prevention in streams with an average width of less than 20 fmoi(measured between the ordinary high water marks (DHVVK4)). Bank stabilization activities in these small streams are limited to the placement of no more than 1/4cubic yard of fill material per linear foot below the plane of the OHWM unless the Corps determines on a case-by-case basis that the use of larger or greater quantities of material is appropriate. 3. Nationwide Permit No. 23: Approved Categorical Exclusions. PCN is required for all pnojao(o utilizing Categorical Exclusions. 4. Nationwide Permit No. 27: Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, and Enhancement Activities. This permit is revoked for activities in which the project purpose iafishery enhancement in perennial streams. These types of projects may qualify for authorization under Regional General Permit No. 12 for Aquatic Habitat Improvement for Stream Channels in Colorado. o. Channel realignment is not authorized by this permit unless it is demonstrated that the realignment is consistent with the natural morphological evolution ofthe stream. b. The use ofoonorata/groudng is not allowed in perennial atn+oma unless waived in writing by the DE. u. The construction of water parks (e.g. kayak courses) and flood control projects are not authorized by this permit. Regional Conditions Applicable to All Nationwide Permits within the State of Colorado 5. Important Spawning Areas. Activities are not authorized byany nationwide permit except after case-by- case review and consultation with Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) if the activities would adversely affect important spawning areas orwould be conducted in these waters during trout and Kokanoo spawning seasons. Bio-engineering techniques, such asnative riparian shrub plantings, are required for all bank protection activities that exceed 50 linear feet in important spawning onyae. For activities located in these important spawning ereos. PCW is required and consultation with CPVV must be conducted in accordance with the timeframes established in GC 32 (Pre-Construction Notification). Important spawning areas are considered Gold Medal Waters in Colorado (Attachment 2). 1 January 11.281r NOTE:Pre-application consultation with the CPN< preferably on-ade is highly Providing documentation of consultation with CPkKstating that CPN/has reviewed the proposed project and has no concerns, wil/be helpful in project evaluation by the Corps. Please visit the following state website todetermine the appropriate CPN/office for coordination: . S. Fens. All nationwide permita, with the exception of 3, 5. 6, 20, 27, 32. 37. and 38, are revoked for activities located in fens and wetlands adjacent to fens. PCN is required for activities proposed for authorization by Nationwide Permits. The PCN will address potential adverse effects to fen hydrology. The permittee may not begin the activity until the Corps determines the adverse environmental effects are minimal. Afen imdefined moa groundwater-fed wetland with saturated organic soil (greater than or equal to 16 inches in thickness)that is classified as a histosol in the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Field Indicators ofHydric Soils in the United States (Version 8.0, 2U16). Acopy ofthe document can be obtained from the NRCS at . Note:A fen may be part of a larger aquatic system (fen complex) where wetlands and other waters adjacent to the fen may provide a critical source of hydrology necessary for sustaining the fen. 7. Springs. PCN isrequired for all Nationwide Permits ifthe activities occur within 1QOfeet ofthe discharge point of a spring. The Corps will determine if the proposed project will have more than a minimal effect to the spring and may require an Individual Permit or project modification to reduce/eliminate the spring impacts. For the purposes of this regional condition, a spring is defined as any location where groundwater flow emanates from a distinct point. Springs donot include seeps or other groundwater discharge areas where there is no distinct point source. 8. Suitable Fill. A PCN is required for the use ofbroken concrete as fill material within the State of Colorado. Permittees must demonstrate that soft engineering methods utilizing native or non-man made materials are not practicable (with respect to ooet, existing technology, and |ogiatica), before broken concrete is allowed as suitable fill. Use ofbroken concrete with exposed nmbaria prohibited. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following additional information relates to minimization of impacts to jurisdictional waters of the United States and compliance with the General Conditions: 1. Permittees are reminded that appropriate erosion and sediment controls are required in accordance with GC No. 12 in order to properly stabilize the site and prevent erosion and siltation into wetlands and other waters downstream. Stneambmd material mrother small aggregate material placed alone for bank stabilization will not meet GC No. 12. 2. Permittee best management practices. In order to prevent the spread of invasive and/or nuisance species (e.g., Asian Clam, Grand Valley Asian Tapeworm, Green River Mud Snail, New Zealand Mud Snail), the permittee is strongly encouraged to clean heavy equipment prior to and after construction if the equipment was previously used in another stream, river. |akm, pond or wetland within 10 days of initiating work. The following are recommended methods for preventing the spread of invasive aquatic organisms: Remove all mud and debris from equipment(tracks, turreta, buckets, doags, teeth, etc.) and spray/soak equipment with a 1:15solution of disinfection solution containing the following ingredients: ^ Dia|ky| dimethy| ammonium chloride (5-1096 by weight); 2 January 11.281r °Alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (5-1U96byweighU; ~ Nony| phenol edhoxyu1e (5-1U96byweighU; ° Sodium aesquimaMbonete (i-5Y6); and, ~Totnaoodium ethylene diaminetetnaaootuto (1-1G%) The equipment should be kept moist for at least 10 minutes, and rinsate should be managed as a solid waste in accordance with |ooa|, oounty, state, or federal regulations. A|terna\e|y, equipment, hand tools, boots and any other equipment that was previously used in a river, stream, lake, pond, or wetland prior to moving the equipment to another water body may be disinfected using the following methods: • Spray/soak equipment with water greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 minutes. • Sanitize water suction hoses and water transportation tanks (using methods described above) and discard rinse water at an appropriately permitted disposal facility. 3. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Within the State of Colorado, the waters listed in Attachment 1 are designated a: Critical Resource Waters. In accordance with GC 22, the discharge of dredged or fill material is not authorized by the following nationwide permits in these waters or their adjacent wetlands: NVVPa7. 12. 14. 10. 17. 21. 2Q. 31. 35. 30' 4O. 42' 43. 44. 4A. 5O. Aand B. |naddition, inaccordance with SC 32, notification to the DE is required for the use of the fm|iovvinQ nationwide permits in these waters and their adjacent wetlands: NVVPo3. 8, 10. 13, 15. 18, 19. 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30. 33, 34' 36. 37 and 38. 4. Gold Medal Waters. Within the State of Colorado, the waters |iaimd in Attachment 2 are designated aaGold Medal Waters. Requirements for projects located in these waters and their adjacent wetlands are set forth inRC5above. o January 11,2017 ATTACHMENT DESIGNATED CRITICAL RESOURCE WATERS The Colorado Water Quality Control Division designates Critical Resource Waters (Outstanding Waters) within the State of Colorado. Please note that the following list is subject to change and typically changes on an annual basis. For the most current list, or for more information on specific designations within these watersheds and their tributaries, please refer to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission website: orWater Quality Control Division's website: Animas and Florida River Basins.All tributaries tuthe Animas River and Florida River, including all wetlands, which are within the VVeminucheWilderness Area. Hermosa Creek, including all tributaries, from the source to immediately below the confluence with Long Hollow, except for the East Fork ofHermosa Creek. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Animas River and Florida River which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. This segment includes Lillie Lake, Castilleja Lake, City Reservoir, Emerald Lake, Ruby Lake, Balsam Lake, Garfield Lake, Vestal Lake, Eldorado Lake, Highland Mary Lakes, Verde Lakes, Lost Lake, and Crater Lake. Bear Creek Basin. The main stem of Bear Creek and all tributaries, lakes, and reservoirs, including wetlands, within the Mt. Evans Wilderness Area. Big Thompson River Basin. The main stem of the Big Thompson River, including all tributaries, lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within Rocky Mountain National park (RyWNP). Blue River Basin. North Fork of the Swan River, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the confluence with the Swan River. All tributaries to the Blue River, including wetlands within the Eagle Nest and Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs within the Eagle Nest and Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness Areas. Boulder Creek Basin. All tributaries to Boulder Creek, including |akea, namon/nirs, and vvet|onda. located within the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area. Cache |a Poudre River Basin. All tributaries tothe Cache Lu Poudre River. including |akee, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within RMNP and Rawah, Neota, Comanche Peak, and Cache La Poudre Wilderness Areas. Clear Creek Basin.All tributaries toClear Creek, including |akem, naaenx/irm. and wetlands, located within Mt. Evans Wilderness Area. San Luis Valley(Closed Basin). All tributaries in the Closed Basin, including wetlands, lakes, and reservoirs, located within the Le GaritaWilderness Area. The main stem of Sand Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the mouth. The main stem of Medano Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the mouth Cm{onudn River Basin. The main stem of the Colorado Rivar, including all tributaries and wetlands, located within or flowing into RK4NP. All tributaries to the Colorado River and Frasier River within RMNP and within the Never Summer. Indian Peaks, Byers, Vasquez, Eagles Nest, and Flat Top Wilderness Areas. Main stem ofNorthvvaterCreek and Trapper Creek, including all tributaries and wmt|ondn, from their source to the confluence with the East Fork of Parachute Creek. East Middle Fork of Parachute Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands from the source to the confluence with Middle Fork of Parachute Creek. 4 January 11.281r Battlement Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from its source to a point immediately downstream boundary ofBLMlands. Main stem of Rapid Cnamk, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to o point immediately below the confluence with Cottonwood Creek including RruzmnSprings. Dolores River Basin. All tributaries to the Dolores River and West Dolores Flivmr, including all wet|ends, thbutahea, which are within the Lizard Head Wilderness area.main stem of Rio Ladohnm the source Lo the confluence with the Dolores River. Main stem ofSpring Creek from the source huthe confluence with Stoner Creek. Main stem ofLittle Taylor Creek from the source tothe confluence with Taylor Creek. All lakes, and reservoirs tributary to the Dolores River and West Dolores River, which are within the Lizard Head Wilderness area. This segment includes Navajo Lake. Eagle River Basin. All tributaries tnthe Eagle River system, including |akeo, reeervuire, and wetlands, located within the Eagle Nest and Holy Cross Wilderness Areas of the Gore Range. Abrams Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the eastern boundary of the BLM lands. Fountain Creek Basin. Severy Creek, including all tributaries, from the source to a point just upstream of where the Forest Service Road 33Ocrosses the stream. Bear Creek, including all tribuiariea, from the source to a point upstream of GPS coordinated N3847682. VV1O454917 (this location iaatelevation 8.2OOfeet above sea level atm258degree angle and 3.QU0feet from the trai|hoadofthe Mount BuukhornTrail off High Drivo). Upper Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to the Gunnison River, including and wetlands, within the La Garita, Povvderhnrn. West Elk, Collegiate Peeka, Maroon Bm||a, Fpeoi| Ridge, or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. All tributaries and wetlands from North Beaver Creek to Meyers Gulch, from the West Elk Wilderness boundary to their confluences with Blue Mesa Reservoir, Morrow Point Reservoir, or the Gunnison River, excluding StuubmnCreek, North Willow Creek, and Soap Creek. All lakes and reservoirs that are tributary tothe Gunnison River and within the La Garita, Pmvvdarhorn, West Elk, Collegiate Peaks, Maroon Bells, Raggeds, Fossil Ridge, or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. Lower Gunnison River Basin.All tributaries iothe Smith Fork, including all weUonds, which are within the West Elk Wilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs tributary tothe Smith Fork, and are within the West Elk Wilderness Area. North Fork of the Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to North Fork of the Gunnison River, including all wetlands, within the West Elk orF7aggedeWilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs that are tributary to the North Fork of the Gunnison River and within the West Elk orRaggedsWilderness areas. Laramie River Basin. All tributaries tothe Laramie River system, including |akea, reaervoire, and wetlands, located within the RewehWilderness Area. Los P|nos River Basin. All tributaries iothe Los Pinoe Rivor, including all wetlands, which are within the VVeminuoheWilderness Area, All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Los Pinos River which are within the Werninuche Wilderness Area. This includes Granite Lake, Divide Lakes, Elk Lake, Flint Lakes, Moon Lake, Rock Lake, Betty Lake, Lost Lake, Hidden Lake, Vallecito Lake, Eldorado Lake, Trinity Lake, Leviathan Lake, Sunlight Lake, Hazel Lake, Columbine Lake, and Emerald Lake. K8anzos River Basin. All tributaries of the Mancos River located within Mesa Verde National Park. North Fork of the Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to North Fork of the Gunnison River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the West Elk and Raggeds Wilderness Areas. n January 11.281r North Platte River Basin. All tributaries tothe North Platte River and Encampment Rivers, including lakes and reservoirs. All wetlands located within the Mount Zirkle, Never Summer, and Platte River Wilderness Areas. Piedra River Basin. All tributaries tmthe Piedra F<iver, including all wetlands, which are within the VVeminuoheWilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Piedra River which are within the VVeminuoheWilderness Area. This segment includes Window Lake, Monument Lake, Hossick Lake, and Williams Lakes. Rio Grande Basin. All tributaries to the Rio Grande, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the VVeminuchuWilderness Area. Roaring Fork River. All tributaries of the Roaring Fork River system, including lakes and reservoirs, located within the Maroon Bells/Snowmass, Holy Cross, Raggeds, Collegiate Peaks, and Hunter/FryingponWilderness Areas. San Juan River Basin. All tributaries to the San Juan River, Rio Blanco, and Navajo River including all wetlands which are within the Werninuche Wilderness area and South San Juan Wilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs which are tributary to the San Juan River, Rio Blanco, and Navajo River and located within the Weminuche Wilderness Area and South San Juan Wilderness Area. This segment includes Archuleta Lake, Spruce Lakes, Turkey Creek Lake, Fourmile Lake, Upper Fourmi|eLake, Crater Lake, Quartz Lake, Fish Lake, and Opal Lake. San Miguel River Basin. All tributarieo, including vvet|endm. to the San Miguel River, and within the boundaries ofthe Lizard Head, orMount Snmffe|*Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the San Miguel River and within the boundaries of the Lizard Head, or Mount Snmffa|nWilderness Areas. South Platte River Basin. All tributaries tothe South Platte River. including |okmo, n*eervoina, and wetlands, located within the Lost Creek and Mt. Evans Wilderness Areas. SLVrmin Creek Basin. All tributaries tnSt. Vnain Creek, including |akoe, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Indian Peaks Wilderness Areas and 0K4Np. Uncompahgre River Basin. All tributaries to the Uncompahgre River, including all wetlands, which are within the Mt. Snoffe|eorUncompahgre Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Uncompahgre River and within the Mt. Sneffels or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. White River Basin. All tributaries\othe White River. including |ak*s, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Flat Tops Wilderness Area, including Trapper's Lake. Yampa River Basin. All tributaries tothe Yampa River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within Zirk|m. Flat Tops, and Barvis Creek Wilderness Areas. o January 11,2017 ATTCHMENT2 GOLD MEDAL WATERS The following list of important spawning areas has been defined as Gold Medal Waters by the State of Colorado. As a reminder, according to RC 5 above, PCN is required for all proposed nationwide permit activities inthese waters; consultation with CPW must be conducted in accordance with the timeframes established inGC32. NOTE: This list of Gold Medal Waters is subject to change. For the most current list, please refer to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPVV) Cm|onadn Fishing Brochure available onthe CPVVwebsite ( ) Fishing Brochure orcontact any CPVV or Corps office in Colorado. GOLD MEDAL LAKES: North Delaney Butte Lake inJackson County. Spinney Mountain Reservoir in Park County. Steamboat Lake inRouttCounty. GOLD MEDAL STREAMS: Animas River from Lightner Creek to Rivera Crossing Bridge. Arkansas River from the confluence with the Lake Fork of the Arkansas, near Leadville, downstream to Parkda|matthe Hwy. 5Obridge crossing above the Royal Gorge. Blue River from Dillon Reservoir Dam toGreen Mountain Reservoir in|etand . From Green Mountain Reservoir dam toColorado River confluence. Colorado River from Fraser River toTroublesome Creek confluence. Also, the 24mile reach from the confluence with Canyon Creek, at the mouth of Gore Canyon, downstream to the confluence of Rock Creek, near the town ofMcCoy. FryingpaoRiver from RuediReservoir dam tuRoaring Fork River Confluence. Gore Creek from Red Sandstone Creek toEagle River confluence. Gunnison River from the upper boundary of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument downstream tothe confluence with the North Fork ofthe Gunnison River. North Platte River from the RmuttNational Forest boundary tmthe Wyoming border. Rio Grande from Farmer's Union Canal upstream to the upper boundary ofCollier State Wildlife Area. Roaring Fork River from the confluence with the Crystal River downstream to the confluence with the Colorado River. South Platte River: The Middle Fork of the South Platte River downstream from U.S. Highway 285, the South Fork of the South Platte River downstream from the outlet at/\ntero Reaervoir, and from the confluence ofthe Middle and South Forks ofthe South Platte River downstream tothe inlet ofSpinney Mountain Reservoir. 7 January 11.281r COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Permit File Name: Willows Apartments at Grand Park project Action ID: SPK-2002-75601 Nationwide Permit Number: 46 Permittee: Grand Park Development, LLC Attn: Mr. Clark Lipscomb Post Office Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 clark cstoneholdings.com County: Grand County Date of Verification: May 21, 2021 Within 30 days after completion of the activity authorized by this permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District Northwest Colorado Branch 400 Rood Avenue, Room 224 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 SPA-RD-CO(c)-usace.army.mil Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit your authorization may be suspended, modified, or revoked. If you have any questions about this certification, please contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above-referenced permit, including all the required mitigation, was completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit verification. Permittee Signature Date End 2 Ad#: Lts4f9XMaTa22tVK79fv Customer: Jerilynn Medina Public hearing Willows Apartments PROOF OF PUBLICATION MIDDLE PARK TIMES STATE OF COLORADO) SS COUNTY OF GRAND) See Proof on Next Page I, Meg Boyer, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of, says: The Middle Park Times,that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Grand, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Grand for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 insertion; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 14 Oct 2021 in the issue of said newspaper. Total cost for publication: $0.00 That said newspaper was regularly issued and circulated on those dates. 44. hql:�, Publisher Subscribed to and sworn to me this date, 10/14/2021 Nottar Public, Grand County, Colorado My commission expires:August 19, 2024 JERI MEDINA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20164029598 Advertiser: W COMMISSION EXPIRES AUGUST 19,2024 Swift Communications 580 Mallory Way Carson City, Nevada 89701 (775)850-7676 PI..ilbllic Ihr=ariku Wlilllk-.)w!s Allaa tirneu ta;. IPa ge II o 2 Expected piriint diin-winsioins of advertisement: I`,Jewspapeir page slize: Kdd,-oy IMO hn, IHIight. 1,...H,0lion. Width� 3,96 hn, IHeugl.�u 5,53 ling, F'UbhsIheir irnay wira�p clir 1,-,)re,ak noticebetweein Ipages, NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING urrE N{-ME DUH—MAN, F RAN ED III I IFIRE 11. MI ,UO I El nER,,10 LO I'll",N711, 1, A, "ITN"'I'I'MMMETH'I 2 El 1%'11 IN.1 EMILEDE N.Hsl,F_jE2, OR I -TIMITTEIIIIIIIENTRIEREFFEEIII-IIIN I ED ER I,I ITI.D. NONDEII I'll I AFI�INFHIIIRF 011� I M FOR I IIE1 lOMEFA,01IRD M�121"IFF CUR,��MHNEFEEREAUF INl�5��,G FED A�Fl�r,"EIRIOAF170"J" ARILE 1111 11�l IIANARI LFN111 FELT ME II1IG0AI 1`122MV,l I FRED A DEREFFIF I OF NFEURI D 11 1,1 IRM". R.-MEN I'll"A.,2 TONLE III Il 11 1 1.Ol OF UIRTAIRDIFFIUREARELEA GL' I LENIII III II MEN ME M IIIIFEd'I'I' I.. IlUNL A IMEM OEM1M,EEFMIEN�AU ===E1. AN N"1',N`Mt`1`1FAN'1jW1j HER M NV�T 11111 FILE A ITHER. REA1111 11 11 1 FURNIEN 1,11 11 1 IIIIIFITF IIHIFELL ��'DFEFF AFR�OFIM)IINS.INA IF FEE FELLINNI MHORTHRUE—1 1 R�11 1 TONLE III'1 11� " ��,�.I%IRNLREERNUAMIRRNRFRANIFUNINI MIFI��Flll.11 21111—FININUTHOR. 1 1.1 A, ��INIINII 21 INJILURINFEATURE1 E A A OFF 11111 DELTUREREAR 1.1.1 FINE NO 2 111 1.IFFENOTHE 21 IMIAL M111111 NINIM LET, 1 1 R, AN F1 M 1�AN I ICF"'IT"11"12MIMF ININ'WE FO'I IF p I AIMM' .1111.11MEREATEMENEIRELI FLUNIII 11FIFIRRITIEUNINUE121 INRAFIFIIIINNIINAM 112 11 IIOFF�; 10 IT 1 1111 FEET IRA EDIT IF IUREHRE I ALLE .1.OF 1.21 TLE IILL.IAIG.1—NINE.111ROINEETEREFOU FIFERRIDELLE DO All IIANN,1,1,IRREAUT IFILIEl 1,9 REENIIIA REM NUDE 11 A NOTHER1 & HIT III IN IN Ell�`IVEUR TRAFFER, IIIIENINTLE111al ,II—DERITTLEN2EI E,�W U, FEET 11 INUI IF NOMN RENTER IF INORNME I.EARLDRUENEELE LEFIFORS. 1,2,ED FIND I HE IE'I El A, I EWPMfNEVl5 1 ME III IIINEI IF 1111 ll MAND11 11111 MIE 11 NO 11 ME.1 MOUROF "OF THIRD I IF 11 21 W 1111 FILE IF R*�lMEA FIT. 111 11 0'1 I'l F,1 11 Z, FEEL M.N"2TE"U1K1'F L""ZZ'I THEIIIIIIN11FIRRODIF �FEAAEFARFFN. II.—INTLEREEIRAFFE,FIREFFER 1 SIFEETUARTHEREFEEIIIIEFOREEMEENTIMEREFE IN E,I GEE FEE`'IdHULL.-I'E" .'IF 1111 REELEff HOD OF WHEN IM"21 21 11-1 IFTEI FLHENII�11,THIREEN IIU11 IMENEDIIIII ME IFUNIANTE 11 SIR-OLLIENT TH IIIEFF I III THIRD I ll�11 11 IIA IF RER MGENI FOREARD1 IF�EA R�1E` ll��NIIFAEL IF HERTHEI I R-wnlcn I I I I I I A I I I OR I IR I I I I I I I I, AJ OF I M4T 0 E I EU FEEL los FORT OF LET:NI.11 1�11 1 111IFEEF NIN FINERA I.10O.I.REAR.Ol TZI'E Ill 1�1"1 1 IM1 RR IF ��M�OALINN 1.1 10 AN RNIFE'VINI" M E_HOEIRA,"'IN'A'INM AT I FENIG" OU: I TREEM IT 1 11 1 11 RE FELT I ITERELF I�'%�1 1111 FEEL TREND 111 OR 11'1 HE 11 FEETEM I EFORE IF ITIOATILE RER IFNG� I ITHREFFEE I RO ON 1�4 F TO A 111.OF HER III—CORRODE AERN j 1 1111 R`0F Fl%�'Fll ME R`111U TO MW�E1,1R1,EEE A NOR TO'l UL R 91 DMEM"ING THE"C'A ITrENTWRYEICT�ELE�M��AWUeFI."I I I I I I/I"RE,I�U MET,CENTREEL MILE IF El 111ANDIETERIMIFIIIIIIIIIE HE 1 11 11 W *,IN IIII OURT ,II FUENr I I,_U;?�l 1 1111 TREND 1 11 11 1 II-EIR IT I THEI11111' I-FELL 11 MIROF1171FORAT REEIIIIIIIIEUMMORIIII-O 11 1 IIIIFEFF II I THEIIIIII 6�:l �.2�,F4E. '2"ED I I I�IM ORIOLE IA1O1M IFIII.I.�R`1''I', L ED EI I�E E=:ATING. A�,ME HERTHE REAREETER A RENTI.11 RR IF FEE HI I TREND 111 11 11-1 1111 FEEL MOM.NIFURIENEIT IIINEHF 1111 DARETHE_" 41-AN.1 V.1EM IF 1111.TIE ITOOM IF MU REIRE,I ll�11 I�El IT—.1-F Il 11 A GRAN, OF N,OR 2 E` 111.TO ME MEA, NFUDE III Fl—NI 111 TIED C FUNDS-NNUMMI 111.F-EDLEARRI IF SION WELL 1.11 FORD 1 11 11 11 1 1 I IN,IF I " "�'=TH. I.III IIII ME.101 A LURE III=11`1'll,`F�ED IENTUREAL NOTHE IF ILE TI, I TRAD 11,U�1,�,121,1,1,1,FEEI III lEENNOTTEll FEET I.sxuxo OF MIR E1111 NO 11w,I LED Ull LURE 11 HEREll 5 1 1, �I. INI.,.OF ITHE REARE 2 IF 11'1 11.TIME THEINEET IFIFEREMIEFERAIIELLIELF L121 III TIIIIALIIIIHEIIIAIUMIIIHEIIII TAINIARREARIOF FORK 11-111 MITI IFIRIIIII THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEURN I D ADED OFF-'I�IF I' NO I,ON A M UHR01.NOFF NREFEEI�7F 15 DIN I IFUNNER11 1 FILM RMIE I IT W OF 1 ORTIP I—ITATE OF IULENOUR.111.1. FEREFEREFE III /NIP Cl� '.1".A.'EIRIDERTRI IF.T.10—FRELLIE I.I ",I RNMERN,,EIRE ,NAMR, D IN ANN E, ORFEI I UT I.UIUN AT 1-11.1 IF.IN I HERNI ALINI I I OF ANII TARIFEET R 2 11 El 111 Ol FEEL _�D 1, 'l ANNRIEFTEREEM,1`FTI`lEPTILIEDI'l Of WNIMEFn D u AITIMILFED I =`ERH`=INMU OF DILROM 21 1 REENTI REARIE 11 NERE IF TIE EM 11 1 REINER.1.NIOR I.REENTHERNEIT C I..IF TIE IDETIME IF THE RUMF THERE I�'I'.1:ll�L 1111'21'�Eff TRE,I.HIRER LINE OF 1121 DAR 110 11 AT IRAN I �Il'I El 1 1211111 1 OF'A'"M I'A-T T"1141 1 DERIO OF DOURIESI DEENIE 111'.lI W 1.11 FEET 1. I' I.TIRE 111.11 DOOR 11 PW 1 11111 INIE I 11111 TIE IIUN[AN1 01 Ell ILLEN AM IN THERILI I.21 XUI"Il TREND I.Al 11—111 UUM TO A DUE OF IREFFOREEN. RETHERELE III FIIIERRI 1ILMI xp2 �MIJRAEL I AK 1,41 ,1,1 IIIIFIEFEI M1.'CTEN M1,1,1I11 fd 2�d'.OE,MTE,�MOO�FIMMII,YZ2,1,11l,IMAI 12FEREARIELDER,11 UO,, I Nifty, I TREEM�21 TO l2 I 111 IF FELL l W DI El FEET 10 1 INTEL I HIM IF.1 HIRE 11 O�FFEIIIRTI,1�1' ITERELLEFOETT�-W 1,11IFETTRIATURLDNEN IENFIU IIIINN'EIIIHIM,SIEFFEREERIEDREIRE11FORIENDINEA OR IM, EFFMAIDNIFFNEN ENNIENRI UJI.M.ON TIE SELMETHE LINE IF THE ROUT ,I, W FERREL AT IFIED.1 REMOR NO I ORIIIIER.MIDIFFIR NO IMILE—III TRINTOOF ITARR HE"IF A '-T'F"o`F"-'�""�A ME NO =11 ME UNIT III,IF 11 LURE 11111 ILI FREE III FITEERINI IN 11)IOUMU REET ACENTURENTATRILE IF 0`11 NORIN"'111 1 111 DEALL 111HEREMI FEEND IFNI.1 1 OF IIALITH LLERN AT 1.1 IA. NO I TIE FELL.111 I I THERIE 111 11 11l'E Ol"E,2_ OR"IS"'I'1 5 F I I FIE'I Il I I�E,171,1 FEEL I I III�'EA,1,0I III AFERF�F HDRE All RER 11 FEE V I NO MEN'ITO IOU IF A LE AN AIV ROD 2M.EFFELLEAR, I AK 'CTEN M1,1,11 I I'RIOETITTIFULL NANO�FFMEUEIIYa�2 11 UED A IAINIF 1111 11 I I ITHERFEE 11 OR 11 1�I FEET TOME NER11.11 11HEEI IF III I I I ..IF I ll�1111 11 J1 FEET I, ,�j C, 11 11 II-E IRAIAFEEl AT 1.6.11 FUNl 111�21 11 1 1.11 FLUTUDI IREETILLAIL FORNER I III III IIIIIIIII IFINNE.1 1,4�T DOE I UHD 11,W 1111 FEEL E�EN,�El HERNII III FOIIIIII 11)UNENI III IIU11 NEELARIII ALONI ME IIININEO OF 111 AT UND 111 1�1FEET I...OR I HU F.M.I IU 11 41 HE I "101OF F,�,l FIR),A 1,NH NATE,�*IL INFOR IMI IT I , 11,E FE A' I METUILLEMITI �1,Il,:�I�M' I LEE IF'ERITHE I IF IN 1 IMI IIII RUTH III IMN AIREIRTHE.1 I.,IFEEL FIND I m 11 11 EA I�:ED I " I MW NURREFE I E2 Ol 11-I EI RET FEEL THEIIII HE 11 W 11112 1 ED Il AN FYI'ITME'll'INT'S I REFER El OF 12 1.OF OF A 111 52 11 INN AN RIF LENIM A2'V RE: 'IFE 1 0,DED IF=I IFE,�l ED 11 IT111 REFER 111'11 11 1 DEEMED D 41 A 121 IFFEREE��. 11"1 1111 FID �E I I E I 1 11 EU FEET I.A FORT IF IUREHRE REARE W 7N.0 NRCMEN A,ON '1111E F1,I HERTHE REAUROINTER11, IF MIT A MOTTER I INILE IF 1,15 IFFEREE 11 11"IT 11 F�["D.A FORT IF OURETARIENN FELF.D. NEEII:I El 21 41 A'1111 IDE AN I ME .I IF I,DREH I II TO I I ON NO OEIT TOO PERN IF FIIFIE A IN A41INT WOOL HADII 'I I' THIRD I D I=E WRIN—I I -IFID I OL 11 FEET OF I' -=FREF A DO I OF ED OF OF To THE MET A M MET A C I HERRE AREELE IF UMM,,RENTIM OF I FEE I I IM ORF1 OF 1.111 IF A'R 71�I AM E 0 IT RAINI IT AT NE IF 11 11 =E1 �E,01 A LJORE TO I FEE I I�l I I A III I I,TO 1,1 EA NI III I HE of I NUT IN I 11 1 ART AD HE 1.1 IF 1111 IORI ME I SNs9 11 11 1,.AT 1 111111111 IF 1111 REET ME INII OR M W,0 sl FE IT I THEIFE 1 11 11 22 1%EIlLED II I TREND 111 11 11 W ERE Il F1111 AREIRE I HER MIE1 OUREATME TER,'121111 FDA ED END I THE 11 17 1 DER-EAT U, 'I A IURI61,TFEEED ON,AD 1, 1 ELL A E MAL Iffil HE 0 111 11 W I l2 FEET I OF META 13 1 THEN""FINI ME A"D A 09 11 TO TIE LED NIA"HE I"I UR 4,1 2 1 MET A IMERRIE AREEFULE IF II I�ROEEEUCIIFELF THEM,0�IW I I I AD IF I I IF NOTA,AD,,ITI IF I;I 1 11 11 11 111 OFF. MH IF III FROM TREND III lI 111 IR 10 RE11 "FEET I II1 ME III I OFF FINE IF REINUIRE I I I TREND 11 11 1 1,111IFEET I 1 11 W 2111 DEL 1�� a�151 1�I LODURAT I :A'FNI" Ox u,sFEET I.NEE IF IF REE"Ul AREA,1.11 ALREI Ill 11�FEEIT�I.NlD—I.I.NEIIIT�ZI 1 11 OFFINATERENTRIFF1111ORRAT REEIRIDID 11 EM A�1'OF Il 11 D. I TREND 1. 11,W INEEDITUF&,�,R1ER1 UEANElIITUAM"M TEIIIINII 11 II'W MTEEDEF FERAACR_ ion FUND 1 11 2' W�I R"a IT THENDATINI FIRE NO WUEEF� A(ENTUEEU TREND 1 11 IF 11 W 11 Il I IRA FORT IF II—E A IFLM,1,1,1,ftE LA,%.NEOF 11 IIIIIIELD 5 DEN I I.N5N1 1 THIM REENIE 71 REFT 'd�F`1"FEE,1EIR IF III I D P, �A OF Of A WRYIETIN"E0R1`,IE"`F TATRA III IN ANNEET C OR IF—1 IFENTE IF IDIIII IIIE III'111 1 11 A111111 UIR 1�,E,HE OR I III NOF%D NOA71,F9141 FED"TAN��IFNE DO sINI.12,l2F ED WFMIF V 11 11 W I 11111 FEET LHE I ME I N�W 2F�WIEII_ A'1'1"1'=IN.1.111.21 RINEURRI 1 REENTI NORIE 11 REAL IF TIE EM 23 1 THE I F,21 bF W 12 11 HIRAT IF A FORT IF FURRIUMOU FIND I E,Il 11'W 2o HE DED TO==L FROM 1111111 IIIIE61 CIFEEIR IF TIE RIFFIEREIT INAMETHE IF THE RETURITHERIT LI I TREND ALINI A A I IF A UAM- ANN,OF"LME,;AD1'1'"EftETILLE LET'A"'"IT&O OO�D —'IS' F7jE,.,.JL2,tEL,,F, A NA TO 1 1 FEE, "I 1111 DI III IMENUIL 111.IF EEE 11 LURE..I—' M-AVINERLEI-TAFAIVITNEE 111.OF.111 REATE 111 Il AN 11 FEEL I I E I I I 112`U�2 Dl 10'=IN HE F�4LT El OF NOLLEEN ARNNEHIENII AT INATER.1 NOTE , O�, 2 HER THAD L RO T .1.111'ANOTHTREND I AT 11 211 I�IT LDT 5 RL.I.El IIIIIN 1 D ,101LAFINNIFTEEIELNIFL FLEURIE"IEN 11 A IRRAIN REHO511FREEM IMI NO 1 TRATIFEE III FDIE.111,,1,FOUR IDMNI-I I Ill.I RE AILEREENRI IF IIEN WILL.-..—II LON TH ILTUl &RI vMYTONO OR I IF" I I' M IF TORRE I IN=DEA IT=MET='I I REIII,112.,OR LEAT A I..ANILE OF 1,10 Mff[1,1NTo,W W 21111 FILE 10 A HERE IF C REEMIE TRIIII 1 11 Il I W 1 2 OF ".�OEM HE A TREND 1 14 11 111 E IR El �1 11 NANANFOEN,11 0.'12 1 UED TLE C III OF III 111 11 11'W.I.111 I L I OIL OVELL I I I�'12�'10�F''2 R`H R.R'A'IT I EFTIN H' 9 THE 11111 'END I W IMF I ll 4111 RRET 11 FEEL "E" DID 1 11 11 M'—11 FAIL TO MEN THEN 1111.I R'W Z I�THELL��`DRNF 1'=' THE IS=OAA�,FRETEF ,EF,1E1,1&TF,1,1,TA1IE EM,FEET THE .I IF "I., NER, �W�r A,�ILl OF, 1,1 1,IFEMI 41 MC TFNI HE OF 11'FE14"M IIAI "I�I 411"1'� I HE21,11 0 1,HE E,�K,I UTEA,W I', EA FEE, ,I HERE 1A TREND 1 14 11 1"E 1111 14 1,1, INJ =E�TT.' FRTEA 111101,AT III I INTIE1,111111.IMI.—ORAIRLETTIOILERAIIIECLIT. I IDERTIONE-LETIFFEEDUALLI 1 AD ElE,1,1.RjIFFI IIJUREFLUITEEIRITHERDITTEREENIODUREFFOR RED,ILLEFISITIOMER. IN `��:E'�� 'RIN OR THE, L,1, D,1,E WEEFFEW,11 �,W 'IATE WE"O IF' THREII III FUIIIIIII A III 1115IIIALROMR, ...TIE EIININUI OF ROMENHEREAS AT REATER, I E "' I ME -0 1 111 1 1 EJ�IREEERA FINE,FLUOR,1 TRIIII I NI I I FIRI,, IN I I I ff IF HE MEM I E=FRII 1 11 111U.111 1111-11 11-F INEARI-111 TIE HILLI.RIERN 'E"EkIIITIEIIEI OFAIURIIIEFFE 71'N"FEN.'1�6,0,F�IHIFITFU 11 IT— TREIIIIIIIIII-C DAELEI� ENIEN=l�1FARENEURIF RODUED Al— I`EFMDAL16EAN 0!100 ANILE OF IT 1,,M,,ANM R,0 EL I, NOREN IERHERIII1IR 0111 11 11 AHIMNARRETEREETTER IF 111FEEFT1 HILDIFINIIIEREAUL11,11 10 1 111 �1,101UE,1 I ,11 El FEEL FEED TREND I ll 11411 IR El I E-I A EFORT IF NOR UNLENIENT IUFAF.IE OR 111 11 8'K 111 M A I" III OF III LET FELT,ff— TO III I I 1 1 121 FREET I.FAIRT IF 1,E 1,%1,1 1,IL1ENN ITURRIE OF 9 1111�FEE III IM 10.1 E`J H`A`REN ARRE .FEE OF I�OR�"All'1.1 LEIFOR 0111111 FELL III..I IF WEIII—I 11, 1.1RA.0 I.I�E AI�U2RUF EIR M I HALF I N 0FN,1,AEUNl�F,�I I I I I I I A I I I THAL I I FLE 0 12 1 1 MIR A,�OI�I ITTREETHE NUAROIFI.A,11�la I I I I I A I ARE ME,I,I I I OF 12 11 MC OF I EORR I, �11-11 IE I 11111 FEET 4� 11 FE IT OF ARE MIENII A HIM IF IN H I TREND-II 2A I III RUE—APOREDIURRALLEFFEL DEW,,��A TO I�IWT 0, REAL 11111.1 THE I I..I'I.WILE FIT IT—I FEEER FRI NA 111 MIT I I I IT 11 TURREFE l 11 21 11 IV 2 11 D FELT HE A OF RE IF OFFERFORT,.111 10 1.1 Ilul.,I,LF,I�IIINT RE IN LUE6—IEIEODl A, C IN 2 11.111,1 1,1LIFEARE I I A,FIR IN I I HITTREETHE NUARO.F.�AFRIUI,1�.2 EA.11 A I ARE.I,I I ED I I IF ,I ,DR I, I� %.G OF IJ AND F�M DQ�,T //.11-I 11112 FEET I I III I kA�,IET,1,E 1114 IUMINAN ON EE1,N RUIN I I NNEiRELIT.MH I AUNN IA T�E'.HLR I I ,THEIRRIEFER—1.1 ITT.IR IMIATTENOTTIE TREND I ER Il 111.11 FE-I A EFORT IF ITIOATILE DURATTERE I, , I IF I ED I, I I A jN,�LMOTELOFAIIIINT1 NUI-IN-C OF =ON111 III t�W ITIIFFE"I HE A FORT IF I UREATTLE LEALM OF 11 IR 1.TIE RULED 01.111 OINE 7 OUR MIMI 2E NAFON,1,IL1,,AK OTIEEI ME,FETHERNI III DT El FEEL A IMMERI INILF OF 11 11 FORIALTHERL I, OF TO UF,, Dr I HIMIE C IF A'U"I ME"UaE RE'AR III ON 11'D I I MAE OR EAREFO 5 IN 11 1111 11111 ME �11 1 TIM OF I� I ANILE 1 2, IN,11 LE I 1 10 1 0 D' 1 1 ARE I LOU A III NOEU NEF,MAINZ IT'I"OCNIN',AMFRIK�1,1,,1�N1.�,1.1NFC 11 RI1,=0 IU�-- 1111 FEEL 11 TIE FORT OF DIERE,I ��EEN Ml I OF RM REEI I 11-11 DIADMI M I Ul "�'EIFEEIIIENUMANNILROF4I 11 ,I'll I I 1111 2 FEET U=TROAPORTOF THRE III NLLUN NEAR.. 11 'E'Ill REFOR TIATERT ORNAME ��EENI AF2,1NE2IFF�IM I'l I=TTIR IMPH 11 IFEALFROMERE OR I REIII,1112-UED A REFFEREA AIDE IF,L D T.,NL�I�LEETENE,1.111 A.11..ITIME IF TO EFIM,NIAREF A W NFEREET R,IT A, III IN IAAIE I I'E REILTO W,1 A RAN 4 ME M1,,1�AE,�MER1,1 FEl OR RP,I I I ART 1 11-III IN I OR—11 IF 1-FEEL I.C..IF IN 1, VMh 11 1"U1 MIT LER_o"ME 01 JFI R1 ME 2 FILE I xNEl w I IN 0 A ROD IF OF`1 IRREETER IF MIT 11 TM 21 I.N5,1,1 FOUR,RENEENTEE .,I FORTHE OUNITERE 1 IF THE IT,IFNMLTN T&I I EEEFEE�El. NO FORM 01 IDEREMI DHII ROLE E I OHLANII IIIIIIIER IF.1.1 TREND 6 IF 1,11 W'111 R. NNNE ITNAEEWRR ON,IIII THRO 0 1111 ADOD TIE AlITE. I ME III IF"""''�FWE RAPIll R`F`NR'"Ll'"IF ME 01 p TFEUNDID 11 ANI I 111IFEEIRIAIDNIDNIEDEARIENIFINATTERA AM NET, , I III I I .,I,I 'I 1 2:'I IE'I R,RE 0 1 D 15 El, I ME TO ME FINE OF REENNORM ,NN_R A I REENER 1A 10 111 14 111 FERFURN'I FUE.I IF TER, 11 REFROME MIND 111 IR L� AJEIJ LCII,,HEM FEUIN ME FRED N0EI HERM—11�11 FILIT A IElFffEU,I NRELF IF 11'11 11 OR N,ESI.11D TO ME SITHERIERETTEELI REFFILL IF TIE �,A I FORE,I N ,,, III I I M OULTER,AT FORRER RAM U.,ARE.END HOT.1, IEI l DMA HER, I U EDY'THERE'17 RRIJI,''Ill"' REERI P,E,,I.,I,"'OF 1 11.1,I'll I MY .1E.IDERETERE 11 THREIT I E�121 F5EN 12 A,I 4�1 1 111 LOEOF ARRIT I M FILLIF REEIRENNI OJOI..Mll'I Mll IIIIII,FLUNHAI 11 IU21 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... P�..iblhc hemiru Wil1cws Apairtirneints - IPage 2 o IMP „„ w,p rypvpv„p uuy,�wur a r COILORADO MEMO TO: Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM: Ed Cannon, Town Manager DATE: November 3, 2021 SUBJECT: First Amendment to Agreement for Certain Economic Inducements and Incentives MATTER BEFORE BOARD: On October 9, 2019, the Town entered into an Agreement for Certain Economic Inducements and Incentives (the "Agreement") with Watt Investments LLP for the Vicious Brewing brewery to be constructed at 751 Zerex in Fraser. The Agreement requires the owner to complete construction and acquire a certificate of occupancy (CO) no later than January 1, 2022. If the CO is not obtained, Fraser may terminate the Agreement and require the owner to repay (or pay) all fees, taxes, and other charges due. Construction of Vicious Brewing is progressing, but Mr. Watt has indicated that he may not be able to obtain a CO by January 1St, so he has requested an extension on the agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the First Amendment to Agreement for Certain Economic Inducements and Incentives. r°vv�11 s N:...,� FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN ECONOMIC INDUCEMENTS AND INCENTIVES This FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN ECONOMIC INDUCEMENTS AND INCENTIVES("First Amendment") is entered into effective , 2021, by and between the Town of Fraser, Colorado, a Colorado municipal corporation ("Town"), and the Watt Investments, LLP, a Colorado limited liability partnership ("Owner") (collectively, the "Parties"). RECITALS A. The Parties previously entered into an Agreement for Certain Economic Inducements and Incentives dated October 9, 2019 ("Agreement"). B. Under Paragraph 4(a) of the Agreement, Owner was to obtain the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the commercial improvements included in the Proposed Development not later than January 1, 2022. C. Under Paragraph 4(a), the Town may terminate the Agreement in the event that Owner has not obtained a certificate of occupancy by January 1, 2022. D. Due to circumstances unforeseen at the time of the Agreement, Owner has not yet obtained, and may not obtain by January 1, 2022, the certificate of occupancy contemplated in the Agreement. E. The Town does not wish to tenninate the Agreement on account of the possibility that a certificate of occupancy may not be obtained before the Agreement's deadline has passed. F. The Parties wish to extend the deadline for issuance of the certificate of occupancy contained in the Agreement to allow proper time for performance of the obligations contained therein. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The deadline for obtaining a certificate of occupancy, as contemplated in Paragraph 4(a), will be extended to July 1, 2022. 2. All other provisions of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW] 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereby execute the foregoing First Amendment. OWNER: WATTS INVESTMENTS,LLP By: Name: Title: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021, by as of Watt Investments, LLC, a Colorado limited liability partnership. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public TOWN: TOWN OF FRASER By: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021, by as of the Town of Fraser, State of Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 2 AOREEMENT FOR CERTAIN I INDUCEMENTS INCENTIVE THIS AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN ECONOMIC",, INDUCEMENTS AND INCENTIVES ("Agreement") is executed effective as of / 9 „�'9.mm.. ("Effective Dates), by and between the TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, a Colorado municipal corporation ("Town"), and Watt Investments LLP (hereinafter referred to as "Owner", whether one or more). RECITALS: A. The Town has adopted the Fraser Economic Development Policy to encourage, in part, the establishment and expansion of retail sale tax generating businesses within the Town of Fraser and to further other public purposes. B. Owner is the owner of 751 Zerex also know as Block 1, Resubdivision of Tracts D and E, of a Minor Resubdivision of Parcel C, Forest Meadows Solar Community, Reception N . 218772, Situated in Section 20, Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Town of Fraser, County of Grand, State of Colorado. Owner intends to undertake a new business development on said Property, generally described as follows (the "Proposed Development") C. In order to facilitate such Proposed Development, Owner desires to obtain the benefits of certain incentives pursuant to the Fraser Economic Development Policy, as set forth below. The Town finds and determines that such incentives will facilitate the Proposed Development, which will generate additional sales tax revenues and otherwise serve the public interest. D. It is an appropriate and lawful function of Colorado municipalities to encourage economic vitality through economic inducements and incentives. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Town and Owner agree as follows: 1. The foregoing Recitals are fully incorporated herein by this reference with the same force and effect as though restated below. 2. Determination Public Benefit Reliance the Town. a. The Town maintains certain guidelines for evaluating the public benefit of commercial development within its corporate limits, and the value of providing economic inducements and incentives to encourage and sustain such development. In reliance upon certain data and information provided to the Town by Owner, the Town has determined that annexation of the Property and eventual construction and operation of the Facility satisfies such guidelines and will be of substantial economic benefit to the Town. ivcien ii nmt P"or Cenain air0 i Page I of b. Owner has provided the Town with certain information and representations upon which the Town has relied in determining future tax revenue generation from commercial activity presently taking place and anticipated to take place in the foreseeable future within the Property. By entering into this Agreement, the Town is relying onOwner's representations in good faith. 3. Agreed Incentives Inducements. In light of the foregoing, the Town agrees to the following incentives and inducements upon the terms and conditions set forth below: a. Fee Rebate. Owner will pay the applicable permit and review fees for the Proposed Development, but the Town agrees to rebate a portion of those fees equal to $1.00 per square foot of new usable commercial space constructed as part of the Proposed Development, payable upon issuance of the certificate of occupancy for such space. b. Use Tax Waiver. The Town agrees waive payment of the Town's building and construction use tax that is otherwise payable on building and construction materials used or consumed within the Town as provided in the Fraser Municipal Code. c. Sales Tax Rebate. The Town will reimburse Owner for the amount of Town sales taxes generated by the retail business operations conducted on the Property following mpletion of and issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the commercial Improvements to be constructed as part of the Proposed Development. Such rebate shall be in an amount equal to 100% of the sales taxes collected for the period of five (5)years following the issuance of thertifiicate of occupancy, and 50 of such sales taxes collected during the subsequent ti (5)year period. Such rebates shall be made on an annual or other periodic basis, as determined by the Town, based on sales tax returns submitted to the State and reported to the Town. Owner hereby voluntarily waives its right tonfiidentiality as provided in State statutes and the Fraser Municipal Code and consents to disclosure of sales and use tax information specific to taxable activity taking place on the Property during the entire period for which such rebates are to be made, and Owner specifically consents to public discussion and analysis of such information before Town governmental and administrative bodies. d. Property Tax Rebate. The Town will reimburse Owner for the increase in Town ad valorem real and personal property taxes collected by the Town for the five-year period following completion of the improvements included in the Proposed Development. The increase in such taxes, and the amount to be reimbursed, shall be measured by the difference between the amount of real and personal property taxes collected by the Town with respect to the Property and any business personal property used in connection therewith for the tax year preceding the year in which a certificate of occupancy is issued for the commercial space included in the Proposed Development, and the amount of such taxes collected for the tax year when such certificate of occupancy s issued and each of the four(4)succeeding tax years. The reimbursement shall be paid for each year within 90 days after collection of the taxes andrife tion by the Town of the amount to be reimbursed. Page 2 of 6 e. Deferral of PlantInvestment . The Town agrees to allow the deferred payment of water and wastewater plant investment fees, which are normally payable at the time of issuance of a building permit. Owner will be allowed to pay such plant investment fees in three( )equal annual Installments, without Interest, with the first installment payable on or before the date that is one (1)year after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the commercial improvements to be constructed as part of the Proposed Development, and with subsequent annual installments payable on or before each anniversary date thereafter. f. Service Fee Waiver/Deftrral. The Town agrees to waive payment of service fees for water and wastewater service until the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the improvements included in the Proposed Development, or until three ( ) years after the date of this Agreement, whichever comes first.. 4. Conditions; Enfbmement. a. Completion of Improvements. This Agreement is entered into upon the condition that Owner shall commence construction of the commercial improvements included in the Proposed Development prior to January 1, 2020, and obtain the issuance of a cerdficate of occupancy therefore, not later than January 1, 2022 If this condition is not satisfied by the specified date, the Town may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Owner. In the event of such termination, Owner shall be responsible of payment of all fees, taxes and other charges due, which otherwise have been or would be waived, rebated or deferred pursuant to Section 3 hereof. . Length a tion. At a minimum, Owner shall operate a retail business on the Property for a period of ten (10)years from the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed improvements. If, at any time prior to that date, Owner decides to terminate its business operations on the Property, Owner shall provide the Town with written notice of its decision no later than thirty(30) days prior to the actual termination of operations. In that event, and within thirty(30) days following written demand by the Town, Owner shall repay to the Town an amount equal to ton percent(10%)of the aggregate amount of all rebates and fivers of fees and/or taxes actually provided to Owner pursuant to this Agreement, multiplied by the total number of calendar years remaining in said 10-year period. c. Lien. In the event that Owner fails to repay any rebates, taxes and fees within the time provided for herein, the Town shall have and may enforce a lien upon the Property and all of the tangible personal property of or used by Owner on the Property, for payment of all such sums owed, together with all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney fees. Such lien shall have priority over other liens or claims of whatever kind or nature, except any liens for the nonpayment of property taxes and State sales and use taxes, and may be foreclosed in the same manner as a mechanics lien under the laws of the State of Colorado. In addition to said lien, the Town shall have all other rights and remedies granted to it by state and local law for the collection of unpaid taxes and fees. 5. Miscellaneous. a. TABOR. Nothing herein shall be deemed a multiple-fiscal year obligation in violation of the limitations set forth in Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution. All sums payable hereunder by the Town in any future fiscal year shall be subject to legal availability and annual appropriation. b. Subsequent legislation, constitutional limits. The Town shall not be required to reimburse Owner in the event that subsequent legislation adopted by the State of Colorado makes such reimbursement unlawful, or in the event a court of competent jurisdiction declares any portion of this Agreement or legislation authorizing payment under this Agreement to invalid or unconstitutional. c. Compliance with Title 31, Article 1 , Part 9, C.R.S. In connection with providing these incentives, the Town agrees to comply with any obligations imposed pursuant to Section 31-1 -903, including the notification requirements of sub-section (4)thereof. d. Assignment. Owner shall not assign or subcontract with respect to any of its rights, benefits, obligations or duties under this Agreement except upon prior written consent and approval of the Town. In the event of a sale of the Property, the Town will approve an assignment to the new owner, provided the Owner is not then in default hereunder and the now owner expressly assumes theOwner's obligations hereunder in writing. e. Entire Agreement. This writing constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter, and supersedes any prior written or oral communication, negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings between them with respect to its subject matter. f. ModMcation. This Agreement may not be modified, enlarged or altered, except in writing, signed by both parties. g. No Third PartyBeneficiaries. No person not a signatory hereto shall have any right to seek enforcement or declaration of status under this Agreement. No third party beneficiaries are intended. h. Attorney fees, costs of litigation. In the event of litigation between the parties arising out of this Agreement, and in which the Town shall prevail, in addition to any judgment for damages or declaratory relief, Owner shall pay all costs incurred by the Town, including attorney fees, expert witness fees and other costs of suit. i. Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of Colorado. Venue for all purposes shall be deemed proper in the District Court of Grand County, Colorado. j. No Waiver. A waiver by either party of a breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver ora waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or another provision of this Agreement. k. Severability. If any part, term or provision of this Agreement is held by the courts to be illegal or otherwise unenforceable, such illegality or unenfomeability lgirl0e,ul all F"or Ecionr:uu°nir Inidii cv,,nir.,I'll Is 11111ce"ll i°vics Page 4f6 shall not affect the validity of any other part, term of provision, and the rights of the parties shall be construed as if the part, term or provision in question was never part of this Agreement. I. Covenant Running with the Land. This Agreement shall be deemed to run with the Property and, upon its execution by the parties, shall be recorded by the Town with the Grand County Cleric and Recorder. Upon execution by the parties, this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their respective successors and permitted assigns. In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. TPARTNERS: I i 1 . The Town of Fraser, Colorado, y. " a Colorado municipal corporation i lair,IIng Partner µ J Watt, Managing 17, o� BY, Phigip Vandemaii, Mayor Ruth h I_y ,VV ' att Partner o m W., d I11 R I� n 1 ^ IlmV Ill 1pl ". A .. •II. .4-OE inette cV i I T ler Nathan att, Partner " ( L ) � �.. Ili ��^i'' I� � � I d I , tt; Pnr STATE F COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF GRAND ) Th fore oinginstrument was acknowledged befbre me on the day of OCA P 2019. by Philip Vanmail, as Mayor, and Antoinette McVeigh, as Town Clark, of The Town of Fraser, Colorado, a Colorado municipal corporation. Witness my hand and offlcia�.seal. My Commission expires: Aa&&— ( SEAL ) o Public a ETH LLIblic • f C adory I 201 410slan Expires Now Z1,2 0 ' ".La"r'hti'"ea'IC1Gikrvt FuNt,CII Ec'oIY11oV lic,: VUII"IiI' Page 5 f 0'wwwl I Ito BE too. OF DO ) )ss. iW13RAND The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 2019, by 1,�" of ..................................j a 11 corporation. %%%s%NVjj.0 ss my hand and official seal. 43mission expires: 41-13-2013 -�--N,Osseo Sa B* r A R A L ' Notary Public z C, PU 5%,N W- ORADO ) Osseo" C' )SS. GRAND The f6regoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the dir day of as 2019, by t, '��2 Of a corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. --'wmM 7 1res: o NCITAW PUBUC STATE O AIF COL4MO W GGMA10012W Ntary Pub IG MAROM 10,OM olic 6mossomoss STATE OF COLORADO ) )sS. COUNTY OF GRAND The foregoing instrument was a knqwledged beforeme on the day �1" , 'j 1, �I� of 2019, by Of a rPora ion. Witness my hand and official I. My Commission expires: ( SEAL ) Notary Public Page 6 of 6 MERCEDES NOTARY PUSUC ATE OF OOLQRADO NOTARY ID 20184012394 MY COMMISSIONEXPIRES .. OMM _..._.............�.....w...wRCH ,.....,..... STATE L ) ) s . COUNTY OF GRAND 'i Th li' oin instrument was acknowledged II before n t P day of . 201 9, b o I w.. a of corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: ( SEAL ) NotaryPublic dNigree!r1fi'Vedrvt F-cor dll'1kidui:i„wi llenI;'s w'd lini".''ellifiv'Ies Page 7 of 7 TOWN OF FRASER ORDINANCE NO. 485 Series 2021 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE 10 OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER COMMITTEE NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, THAT: PART 1: AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 2 (Water and Wastewater Committee), Article 10 of the Fraser Municipal Code (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") is hereby amended as follows [Note: additions are shown in bold underlined print; deletions are shown as stFikethFeugh print]: ARTICLE 10 - Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee Sec. 2-10-10. - Creation. There is hereby created a Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee for the Town composed of seven (7)five 5 members who may perform all functions currently or hereinafter authorized by this Article and future ordinances adopted by the Board of Trustees. Sec. 2-10-20. - Members. The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall consist of feur (4) two 2 ex officio members who shall be the naayeF and throe (3) members of the Board of Trustees selected by the Board of Trustees. The balance of the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall consist of three (3) members appointed by the Board of Trustees. All members of the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee may be compensated as established by resolution of the Board of Trustees. Sec. 2-10-30. - Terms. The terms of the ex officio members shall correspond to their respective official tenure. The terms of each of the appointed members shall be two (2) years, or until his or her successor takes office. Terms of the appointed members shall be concurrent with the two-year municipal election cycle. Sec. 2-10-40. - Eligibility. All members of the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall be bona fide residents of the Town, own property within the Town or have at least ten-percent ownership interest in a business that owns property within the Town. If any member ceases to meet these eligibility requirements, his or her membership on the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall immediately terminate. Sec. 2-10-50. - Removal from Water and Wastewater Committee. Members, other than a member currently serving on the Board of Trustees, may be removed by resolution of the Board of Trustees for inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, or if such member has missed three (3) consecutive meetings or three (3) meetings in a fiscal year unless such absences shall be excused by the Committee. The Mayor or the Board of Trustees, as the case may be, shall file a written statement of reasons for such removal for consideration by the Board of Trustees. Due to the nature of matters that may be considered by the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee, members are expected to serve with discretion and shall be required to enter into confidentiality agreements with the Town. Sec. 2-10-60. - Chairperson. The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall elect a Chairperson from among the members. The term of the Chairperson shall be one (1) year, with eligibility for reelection. Sec. 2-10-70. - Expenditures and employees. The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee is not authorized to hire any employees or expend any Town funds. The Town Manager will assign staff and make other resources available as he or she deems appropriate. Sec. 2-10-80. - Responsibilities. (a) The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall act in an advisory capacity to the Board of Trustees as requested by the Board of Trustees and/or the Town Manager. (b) The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee is authorized to explore matters related to water and wastewater and make recommendations to the Board of Trustees and/or the Town Manager. (c) The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall hold at least one (1) regular meeting quarterly. A quorum is not required in order to hold a meeting. Meetings will be held the second Tuesday of January, Ate, July, and October beginning at 9:00 AM at the Fraser Town Hall. Sec. 2-10-90. - Appeals. (a) The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall hear and decide appeals from and review any order, requirement, decision or determination made by any administrative official or Town staff charged with the administration or enforcement of 2 any provision of Chapter 13 (Municipal Utilities), Article 2 (Water System) and Article 4 (Sanitary Sewer System), except for any decision or determination made by the Board of Trustees pursuant to said Articles, which action shall be final. (b) Notice of such appeal shall be in writing, specifying the grounds thereof, which shall be filed with the administrative officer or official from whom the appeal is taken within ten (10) days after the issuance of the order, decision or other action that is the subject of the appeal. Failure to file a notice of appeal within the prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of the right to appeal. (c) Upon receipt of the notice of appeal, the officer or official from whom the appeal is taken shall transmit to the Town Clerk all documents constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was taken and the Town Clerk shall provide the same to the Committee. (d) The Committee shall fix a reasonable time for the hearing of the appeal and give due notice thereof to the parties. Upon hearing, any party may appear in person or by agent or attorney. The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision or determination appealed from and shall make such order, requirement, decision or determination as in its opinion ought to be made in the premises and to that end has all the powers of the officer or official from whom the appeal is taken, subject, however, to the vote requirements specified in Subsection (e) below. (e) The concurring vote of f^�three 3 members of the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall be required to overturn or modify decisions made by any Town official or staff upon appeal to the Committee. (f) The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall render its decision on an appeal within a reasonable time, which decision shall be made or confirmed in writing and delivered or mailed to each party to the appeal. Sec. 2-10-100. -Appeals from Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee. Every decision of the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall be subject to review by certiorari by the District Court and as provided by law. Such appeal shall be filed not later than thirty (30) days from the final action taken by the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee. Such appeal may be taken by any person aggrieved or by an officer, department, board or bureau of the Town. Sec. 2-10-110. - Fees; rules. (a) All appeals to the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee shall be accompanied by payment of a fee as set forth in Appendix A to this Code for each 3 separate appeal submitted. Said fee shall not be refunded, notwithstanding that the applicant has withdrawn such appeal or that the same is denied by the Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee. (b) The Water and Wastewater Advisory Committee is given the authority to adopt any rules necessary to transact the Committee's business or to expedite its functions or powers so long as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the applicable state statutes and this Code and, provided further, that such rules and any amendments thereto must be approved by the Board of Trustees before taking effect. PART 2: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance. PART 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PART 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. PART 5: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published by title only. READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS DAY OF 2021. Votes in favor: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: BY: Philip Vandernail, Mayor ( SEAL ) ATTEST: Antoinette McVeigh, Town Clerk 4 Published in the Middle Park Times on 5