Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20200708 - Agenda Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 20-14 SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Wednesday, July 8, 2020 Special Meeting starts at 5:00 PM* Regular Meeting at 7:00 PM* A G E N D A Consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20, the Governor has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body or state body to avoid public gatherings, and has suspended all contrary provisions of the Brown Act. THIS MEETING WILL BE VIA TELECONFERENCE ONLY 1. The meeting can be viewed in real-time at: https://openspace.zoom.us/j/85417549253 or listen to the meeting by dialing (669) 900-6833 or (346) 248-7799 (Webinar ID 85417549253). 2. Members of the public may provide written comments by submitting a public comment form at: https://www.openspace.org/public-comment • Comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the board president calls for public comments. • Comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time public comment on the agenda item is closed. • All comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at the board of directors meeting. • Electronic comments on agenda may only be submitted via the public comment form. Comments via text or social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Any comments received after the deadline, will be provided to the Board after the meeting. 5:00 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT – STUDY SESSION ROLL CALL 1. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mountain Lion Conservation Efforts (R-20-71) Staff Contact: Matt Sharp Chaney, Resource Management Specialist II General Manager’s Recommendation: Receive and discuss information about the status of mountain lion (also known as ‘puma’, ‘cougar’, ‘lion’, Puma concolor) in California and the Santa Cruz Mountains, and the conservation efforts and policies of the agency to protect mountain lion populations and reduce potential conflicts from human-mountain lion encounters. No Board action required. Meeting 20-14 Rev. 1/3/20 ADJOURNMENT 7:00 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ROLL CALL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the agenda is for members of the public to comment on items not on the agenda; however, the Brown Act (Open Meeting Law) does not allow action by the Board of Directors on items not on the agenda. Individuals are limited to one comment during this section. ADOPTION OF AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar may be approved without discussion by one motion. Board members, the General Manager, and members of the public may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar during consideration of the Consent Calendar. 1. Approve June 24, 2020 Minutes 2. Claims Report 3. Award of Contract for Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting at Eight Mitigation Sites for Five Years (2020-2024) (R-20-74) Staff Contact: Amanda Mills, Resource Management Specialist II General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into contract with Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting for the base contract price of $81,292 to monitor eight mitigation sites for five years. 2. Authorize an allowance of $20,000 to be expended only if additional mitigation sites require monitoring and reporting over the next five years. 3. Authorize a 10% contingency of $8,130 to be expended only if the eight mitigation sites do not meet permit success criteria, additional years of monitoring are required, and/or additional coordination with the permitting agencies is necessary, for a not-to-exceed total contract of $109,422. 4. Award of Contract to Andreini Brothers for the ADA Barrier Removal Project at Russian Ridge, Monte Bello, and Windy Hill Open Space Preserves (R-20-66) Staff Contact: Sean Smith, Capital Project Manager II, Engineering and Construction Department General Manager’s Recommendation: 4. Authorize the General Manger to enter into a contract with Andreini Brothers of Half Moon Bay, CA, for the base amount of $429,504. 5. Authorize a 13% contingency of $55,836 to be reserved for unanticipated issues, bringing the total contract to a not-to-exceed amount of $485,340. 5. Establish the Fiscal Year 2021 Tax Levy for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s General Obligation Bonds - Series 2015A, Series 2015B, and Series 2018 (R-20-72) Staff Contact: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager Rev. 1/3/20 General Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District for each of San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties to establish an ad valorem property tax levy of $1.50 per $100,000 (or $0.0015 per $100) in assessed value for the General Obligation Bonds – Series 2015A, Series 2015B, and Series 2018 (Measure AA). BOARD BUSINESS Public comment on agenda items at the time each item is considered by the Board of Directors. Written public comments will be provided to the Board prior to the meeting and posted on the District’s website at www.openspace.org. All written comments submitted in accordance with the guidance posted on the District’s website will be read into the record. 6. Review of 2020 State of California Legislative Session – Board of Directors Briefing on Matters of Interest to Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (R-20-73) Staff Contact: Joshua Hugg, Governmental Affairs Specialist General Manager’s Recommendations: Receive and discuss the 2020 State of California legislative session update from legislative consultants: Public Policy Advocates LLC and Environmental and Energy Consulting. No Board action required. INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM • Alma Bridge Road Newt Mortality Update INFORMATIONAL REPORTS – Reports on compensable meetings attended. Brief reports or announcements concerning activities of District Directors and staff; opportunity to refer public or Board questions to staff for information; request staff to report to the Board on a matter at a future meeting; or direct staff to place a matter on a future agenda. Items in this category are for discussion and direction to staff only. No final policy action will be taken by the Board. A. Committee Reports B. Staff Reports C. Director Reports ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT – CLOSED SESSION ROLL CALL 1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS (Government Code Section 54956.8) Property:  Portion of San Mateo County APN: 066-280-050 Agency Negotiator: Michael Williams, Real Property Manager Negotiating Party: Ben Wright, Peninsula Open Space Trust Under Negotiation: Terms and Conditions ADJOURNMENT Rev. 1/3/20 *Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is subject to change of order. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the District Clerk at (650) 691-1200. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the District to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Written materials relating to an item on this Agenda that are considered to be a public record and are distributed to Board members less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, will be available for public inspection at the District’s Administrative Office located at 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, California 94022. CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Jennifer Woodworth, District Clerk for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), declare that the foregoing agenda for the special meetings of the MROSD Board of Directors was posted and available for review on July 1, 2020, at the Administrative Offices of MROSD, 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos California, 94022. The agenda and any additional written materials are also available on the District’s web site at http://www.openspace.org. Jennifer Woodworth, MMC District Clerk Rev. 1/3/18 R- 20-71 Meeting 20-14 July 8, 2020 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA ITEM 1 AGENDA ITEM Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mountain Lion Conservation Efforts GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Receive and discuss information about the status of mountain lion (also known as ‘puma’, ‘cougar’, ‘lion’, Puma concolor) in California and the Santa Cruz Mountains, and the conservation efforts and policies of the agency to protect mountain lion populations and reduce potential conflicts from human-mountain lion encounters. No Board action required. SUMMARY Mountain lions in the Santa Cruz Mountains are under threat from several factors, including habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, human caused mortality through vehicle strikes and depredation, poor genetic diversity, and impacts from rodenticide poisoning. Mountain lions are currently in a one-year review period for consideration of listing as a threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act. The Santa Cruz mountain population is one of six populations in the state that is considered at risk of localized extinction due to poor habitat connectivity and genetic depression. The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) has protected nearly 65,000 acres of prime mountain lion habitat in the Santa Cruz Mountains and is committed to protecting regional mountain lion populations by preserving habitat, increasing habitat connectivity, minimizing human-wildlife conflicts, promoting bans and restrictions on rodenticide use, educating the public about mountain lions, and supporting research that improves our understanding of lion populations, ecology, and behavior throughout our region. The District is committed in continuing to support healthy lion populations by furthering efforts to preserve habitat and provide habitat connectivity throughout the Santa Cruz Mountains and beyond. Additionally, the District is working towards amending the Grazing Management Policy to address potential conflicts between wildlife and livestock while protecting lion populations. The District is also exploring opportunities to further local understanding of mountain lion habitat use, behavior, and potential habituation to humans by developing a wildlife photo index project at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve and partnering with the University of California Santa Cruz Puma Project to develop a Human/Mountain Lion Interaction Study and Management Plan. R-20-71 Page 2 BACKGROUND The presence of mountain lions is a strong indicator of ecosystem health. As apex predators, lions play essential roles by regulating deer populations and supporting soil health, scavengers, and decomposers that rely on nutrients and sustenance from decomposing carcasses. Where healthy lion populations persist, deer behavior is influenced, resulting in reduced herbivory within forest-edge habitats. Additionally, lion suppression of deer numbers reduces the prevalence of Lyme disease by naturally managing the deer population that support large numbers of ticks. While lions provide many ecological services that improve ecosystem function as well as directly benefit humans, they occasionally come into conflict with people. Continued loss of lion habitat and urban expansion has increased the potential for human-lion conflicts. The most common instances of human-lion conflict come in the form of mountain lions attacking unprotected livestock or pets. Sheep and goats make up the majority of these attacks and in some cases the livestock owner will request a depredation permit from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for the legal lethal removal of a mountain lion. According to CDFW data, 75-85% of annual lion depredation permits are issued in response to sheep and goat losses. Instances of livestock loss may also increase illegal hunting (poaching) of mountain lions. On very rare occasion, mountain lions have attacked people. Since 1986 there have been only seventeen confirmed mountain lion attacks on people in the state of California, most of which resulted in minor injuries. Unfortunately, three of these attacks were fatal. In instances of mountain lion attacks on humans, CDFW attempts to capture and humanely euthanize the offending lion in order to protect public safety. Two of the seventeen confirmed attacks took place on District preserves, highlighting the importance of District efforts to address human-lion conflict. These two attacks occurred in 2014 at Picchetti Ranch Open Space Preserve, and most recently, in February of 2020 at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. In both cases, the victims of the attacks recovered from their injuries. Permanent signage is posted at all preserve entrances to inform visitors of the presence of mountain lions and provide instructions about what actions to take if a mountain lion is encountered. In both cases of mountain lion attacks on District lands, the District promptly requested CDFW response and coordinated with them throughout each incident. CDFW has the primary reasonability for wildlife management throughout the state. In addition to coordinating with CDFW, District staff implemented District wildlife response protocols, closed preserves, and heightened warnings in surrounding areas to inform and protect visitors. Human-lion conflict threatens mountain lion populations when mountain lions must be removed. There is limited current scientific understanding of factors that influence human-mountain lion conflict as well as appropriate management strategies to minimize these conflicts while protecting healthy mountain lion populations. As a result, the District relies heavily on CDFW expertise, and its role as an important partner who holds the responsibility for managing statewide mountain lion populations. R-20-71 Page 3 DISCUSSION District Policy: In 2014 the Board approved a set of Resource Management Policies (Attachment 1) that direct the District’s resource preservation actions, which are summarized in the Resource Management Mission Statement: The District will protect and restore the diversity and integrity of its resources and ecological processes for their value to the environment and to people, and will provide for the use of the preserves consistent with resource protection. Housed within these Resource Management Policies is the Wildlife Management Policy, which has the following goal: Maintain and promote healthy and diverse native wildlife populations. This goal is supported by specific policies, which include the following: • Policy WM-1: Understand and maintain the diversity of native wildlife. • Policy WM-2: Protect, maintain and enhance habitat features that have particular value to native wildlife. • Policy WM-3: Protect animal populations against the impact of human actions. • Policy WM-4: Protect and enhance the habitats and populations of special status animal species All of the above listed policies relate to the District’s mountain lion conservation efforts, which include funding and support of ongoing lion research, preservation of lion habitat, increasing habitat connectivity, reducing conflicts between humans and lions, public outreach and education about lions, supporting legislation that regulates rodenticide use, and advocating for further legal protections for vulnerable mountain lion populations. Threats to and Status of Mountain Lions: Mountain lion populations face several serious threats that put their chances of long-term survival at risk. The largest of these threats come in the form of habitat loss and fragmentation. Urban development and the expansion of roads and highways have diminished and fractured suitable lion habitat, reducing the ability for mountain lions to survive, reproduce, disperse and spread genes between disjunct populations. This has led to a lack of genetic diversity in several mountain lion populations. A common representation of genetic diversity is ‘effective population size’, which is an estimate of the number of animals in a population with free genetic exchange with the same genetic diversity as the studied population. In fragmented habitats with limited genetic exchange with adjacent populations (breeding), the effective population size may be much lower than the actual population size. A recent study estimates the effective population size in the Santa Cruz Mountain at 17 individuals (for reference, the current adult population size is estimated to be between 33-66 individuals). Many conservation geneticists consider an effective population of 50 or more as necessary to avoid a short-term risk of inbreeding depression. Populations with poor genetic diversity are less resilient to disturbances like drought, fire, and disease, and are at a higher risk for extirpation (localized extinction). R-20-71 Page 4 Mountain lions also face threats from human-caused mortality events, including depredation (permitted lethal removal of a mountain lion in response to the loss of a domestic animal), poaching, and vehicle strikes. These issues reduce the number of individual lions, disrupt social hierarchies by removing established adults, and compound issues of poor genetic diversity by increasing the likelihood of inbreeding. In addition to direct mortalities, humans also impact lion populations through secondary poisonings caused by the use of rodenticides. On April 15, 2020, the California Fish and Game Commission (CFGC) voted unanimously to evaluate mountain lions as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The commission designated six Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESU) that include a region spanning from the Santa Cruz Mountains to the southern Coast Ranges and into southern California. These regions are home to at risk populations representing six of the ten known distinct populations of mountain lions in the state. This decision triggers a one-year review period during which mountain lions will be protected under CESA and will need to be considered during any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process for applicable projects. The District wrote a letter to the CFGC in support of the evaluation for listing (Attachment II) and joined as signatories on letters from the Center for Biological Diversity and the Western Wildlife Corridor Working Group. The District’s letter promotes robust research, expansion of wildlife crossings and habitat conservation work, and assistance from CDFW to facilitate effective human-mountain lion conflict management actions throughout the state. Recent mountain lion population research suggests that the Santa Cruz Mountains differ from areas in southern California in sustaining higher numbers of individual mountain lions but with low genetic diversity. Habitat preservation: The District has protected nearly 65,000 acres of prime mountain lion habitat throughout the Santa Cruz Mountains to date. With the exception of Ravenswood Open Space Preserve and the Stevens Creek Nature Shoreline Study Area, all District preserves include viable mountain lion habitat. Coupled with work of similar preservation agencies, District preserves make up a regional greenbelt of connected habitat extensive enough to support the needs of wide-ranging mountain lions that can require territories of up to ninety square miles. According to a recent study by CDFW, continued protection of high-quality mountain lion habitat, along with improved connectivity between these habitats, are the most essential factors in preserving the species. Habitat connectivity: Highway 17 Wildlife and Regional Trail Crossing Project The District is currently developing wildlife and regional trail crossings across Highway 17 to connect over 30,000 acres of protected public lands. Well-placed and appropriately designed wildlife crossings enable wide-ranging animals like mountain lions to roam while helping to reduce wildlife-vehicle collisions and wildlife mortalities. The Highway 17 wildlife crossing project is one of several local efforts to create connections between the Santa Cruz Mountains, and the Gabilan and Hamilton mountain ranges. A recent study by CDFW suggests that the Santa Cruz Mountains need 196,1170 acres of protected mountain lion habitat to sustain a healthy lion population in perpetuity. Unfortunately, R-20-71 Page 5 the Santa Cruz mountains do not contain that many acres of suitable lion habitat. This makes connectivity a key factor for sustaining mountain lion populations in the region. When completed, the Highway 17 Wildlife and Regional Trail Crossings Project will improve connectivity between the northern and southern portions of the Santa Cruz Mountains and facilitate dispersal into adjoining suitable habitat in the Gabilan and Hamilton ranges. Human-Mountain Lion Conflict: Grazing Management Policy Amendment In the late 1990s, coastal residents expressed their support for extending the District’s boundaries to include the San Mateo County Coast, where development was beginning to threaten the area’s rural character and agricultural heritage. When District boundaries expanded in 2004, a commitment to preserve agricultural land and rural character, and encourage viable agricultural use of land resources, was made to the Coastside community and embedded in the District’s Coastside mission statement: To acquire and preserve in perpetuity open space land and agricultural land of regional significance, protect and restore the natural environment, preserve rural character, encourage viable agricultural use of land resources, and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive public enjoyment and education. To date, the District has protected more than 11,000 acres of open space and agricultural land on the San Mateo County Coast, including more than 40 percent of San Mateo County’s ranchlands. The District has invested more than $16 million in land preservation, environmental restoration, and ecologically-sensitive public recreation on these preserved coastal properties. Coastal grasslands are one of the most biodiverse and threatened ecosystems in North America, and in many cases depend on regular disturbances like grazing or fire to prevent encroachment by introduced species, shrubs, and forest. These disturbances were historically provided by wildlife herds and Native American burning practices. Conservation grazing is distinguished from basic livestock production in that the primary purpose for the use of livestock is to further the conservation goals of protecting and increasing grassland habitat biodiversity, including populations of important pollinators. To accomplish these goals, a Rangeland Management Plan is specifically customized for each grazing site that sets specific management parameters, such as stocking rates, class of livestock, seasonality, and duration of grazing activity. The District uses conservation grazing as a critical tool for managing approximately 8,000 acres of coastal grasslands for ecological health, biodiversity, and wildland fire safety. The District’s Conservation Grazing Program is a mutually beneficial partnership with small-scale local ranchers on the San Mateo County Coast to accomplish multiple goals aligned with the District’s mission. The District began its conservation grazing program in 2007 to maintain and enhance the diversity of native plant and animal communities by preserving grassland habitat, manage fuel loads for fire protection, sustain the local agricultural community, and preserve the region’s rural agricultural heritage. As the District continues to acquire new lands that may be included in the conservation grazing program, there is a growing need to define the roles of the District and its tenants in addressing wildlife and livestock conflicts when they arise. The District does not allow R-20-71 Page 6 and will not consider allowing the take of mountain lions in response to predation of livestock, even if allowed under state law. Amendments to the Grazing Management Policy are currently under review that will provide greater guidance for the District’s conservation grazing program to reduce and/or mitigate wildlife conflicts, further clarify the District’s role and strategy in managing these conflicts, and set a clear understanding for grazing tenants of District provisions for addressing these issues. The proposed amendments are specifically are focused on the following: • Further scientific research: Supporting science that informs wildlife and livestock protection regionally. Researching the best tools to consider for proactively reducing interactions between wildlife and livestock. • Explore economic tools: These include adjusting reimbursements for confirmed losses and adjusting rent to compensate for expected livestock loss. Public Safety The District follows up on all reported mountain lion observations submitted by staff, consultants, and members of the public on District lands. These data, to the extent available, play an important role in allowing staff biologists to evaluate trends in lion activity and determine the appropriate response to potentially concerning mountain lion behavior. When a lion observation takes place, Natural Resources staff contacts the reporting party and conducts an interview to determine the specifics of the observation. Mountain lion observations are evaluated under the District’s wildlife response protocols (Attachment III) and the District takes appropriate actions to reduce risks to public safety, which include consultation with CDFW. Working closely with biologists from CDFW, the District determines the appropriate response to lion activities. The majority of mountain lion observations on District lands do not involve concerning mountain lion behavior. However, there are occasions when mountain lions exhibit threatening or unusual behavior, and in very rare and unfortunate instances, mountain lions have attacked humans. As previously mentioned, two attacks on humans have occurred in District preserves. One attack took place in 2014 at Picchetti Ranch Open Space Preserve, and another occurred on February 16, 2020 at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve. Both attacks involved children and were non-fatal. Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve (RSA) is by far the most popular District preserve with over 700,000 visitors per year. The preserve is bordered by highly urbanized environments to the north and east, Lehigh Permanente Quarry to the south, and acts as a peninsula of suitable mountain lion habitat within this highly developed landscape. In addition, mountain lion prey species, including their preferred prey of deer, attract mountain lions to the area. The combination of highly suitable mountain lion habitat, surrounded by less suitable mountain lion habitat in adjacent areas, and large influxes of human activity likely play a significant role in the number of mountain lion observations the District receives from RSA. Since 2015, the District has taken various actions in consultation with CDFW, including increased signage, public educational tabling, and nine (9) separate preserve closures due to concerning mountain lion behavior at RSA. The District continues to actively monitors mountain lion behavior and coordinate with CDFW as needed. District response to aggressive mountain lion behavior is science-based and multifaceted. Aggressive behavior from a mountain lion is not always abnormal. If a lion has a stashed prey carcass, or young nearby, they may not immediately retreat from the presence of humans. R-20-71 Page 7 Because of this, the District often responds to concerning lion behavior by closing portions of preserves for a one-week period. This gives lions a chance to consume any carcass they may be guarding or relocate young to another den site. In instances when there are multiple reports of aggressive lion behavior from different locations within one region within a short time-period, the District may close an entire preserve. This may indicate that lion aggression is not related to normal hunting/feeding or parenting behavior. In the tragic event of a mountain lion attack on a human, District protocols require immediately closing the Preserve and contacting CDFW. CDFW has jurisdiction over all wildlife in the state and acts on the behalf of public safety to humanely euthanize any mountain lion that has attacked a human. In addition to the actions stated above, the District has undertaken further proactive measures to reduce the potential for human-lion conflict by 1) educating the public on mountain lion safety, 2) holding public education events to inform the public about lion activity, and 3) modifying access to the preserves when warranted. First, permanent preserve signage includes information about what to do if visitors see a mountain lion and, in the event, that the District has received reports of a recent sightings, increased temporary signage or warnings are posted in accordance with District protocols. Second, with regard to public education, since 2017, the District has held annual “Mountain Lion Awareness Week” tabling events where staff and volunteers provide onsite lion safety information to preserve users at RSA. On May 28, 2020, the District also held a virtual live event titled “Coexisting with Cougars”, which informed 380 participants on the District’s work to conserve mountain lions and how to stay safe in lion habitat. Third, the District has modified its management of the RSA preserve in order to reduce the chances of visitors encountering mountain lions. Specifically, in response to an encounter in 2016 where joggers running at RSA before sunrise were approached by a mountain lion, the District changed preserve operation hours to discourage public access during non-daylight hours when lions are more active. Rodenticides: Research by the Department of Pesticide Regulation discovered that 92% of mountain lions throughout California had been exposed to anticoagulant rodenticides. Rodenticide poisoning is often linked to notoedric mange. This disease is caused by mites infesting the skin of animals with compromised immune systems, making them weak and emaciated, impacting their ability to survive. In 2014, twelve bobcats at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve died from notoedric mange and dozens were reported sick. District research discovered that commonly available rat poisons within a category of pesticides known as second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGAR) were linked to the bobcats’ illnesses. In response, District staff educated preserve neighbors about the effects of rodenticides on wildlife and joined the ongoing effort to lobby the California State Legislature in prohibiting the use of SGARs. In 2014, the legislature passed AB 2657 limiting access to SGARs to individuals with pest control licenses. The District also implemented a new plant and animal pest management program in the preserves that focuses on non-chemical controls and furthers its ongoing prohibition of SGARs on District land to protect human and environmental health. SGARs are still used to this day by pest control companies and continue to impact local predators. In 2019, legislation to ban the use of SGARs in California (AB 1788) was pulled from consideration and will be taken back up in 2020. R-20-71 Page 8 Mountain Lion Research: To facilitate scientific understanding of lion behavior, ecology, movement, and population dynamics, the District has worked with and supported research efforts by the University of Santa Cruz California (UCSC) Puma Project (for over a decade), CDFW, Pathways for Wildlife, and the Bay Area Puma Project. The District has granted access to preserves for research activities, provided grant funding, and coordinated with research organizations to facilitate groundbreaking research that has improved scientific knowledge of lions in the Santa Cruz Mountains and throughout the state. These efforts have helped identify suitable wildlife crossing locations, lead to greater understanding of the genetic structure of mountain lion populations throughout California, and informed the collective understanding of human impacts on lion populations and behavior. Future opportunities: Rancho San Antonio Wildlife Photo Index: Natural Resources staff are currently developing a Wildlife Photo Index project to deploy at RSA. This project will rely on a system of wildlife cameras strategically placed to collect standardized data on wildlife diversity, habitat use, and abundance relative to other species. This study can inform the District on how lions are using habitat at RSA and what factors might influence their movement patterns, including human activities and recreation. This project will provide opportunities for community science and volunteer engagement in the form of outreach and data management. This project is scheduled to begin in Fiscal Year 2020-21. Human-Mountain Lion Interaction Study and Management Plan The District has made exploratory steps in developing a lion collaring study at RSA and surrounding preserves in partnership with the UCSC Puma Project. This project seeks to understand the factors that influence interactions between humans and mountain lions, and develop site-specific management actions for reducing the potential for human-lion conflict in areas with high levels of human-lion encounters. The proposed five-year study will rely on GPS accelerometer collar data to determine lion habitat use in relationship to numerous factors, including human activity, habitat type, and trail characteristics. This study will also estimate the local lion population at RSA and surrounding preserves to the extent possible. FISCAL IMPACT None. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This item is being brought to the full Board given full Board interest. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. CEQA COMPLIANCE R-20-71 Page 9 Review and discussion of mountain lion status in California and the Santa Cruz mountains, current and future District conservation efforts and policies relating to mountain lions, and work to reduce potential human-lion conflicts is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. Approval of future studies and projects related to the work discussed in this report will be accompanied by appropriate CEQA review. NEXT STEPS The projects mentioned in this report are included in the District’s Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget and Action Plan. Below is a summary of the schedules for these projects: Highway 17 Wildlife and Trail Crossing Project • 2020-2022: Environmental review and Caltrans Project Report • 2022-2024: Design (plans and specifications) • 2025-2029: Construction (funding dependent) Grazing Management Policy Amendment • September 1, 2020: Planning and Natural Resources Committee Meeting • October 28, 2020: Board Adoption of Policy • 2021-2026: 5-Year Wildlife and Livestock Protection Efficacy Research Wildlife Photo Index Project • July 2020: Deploy camera array • 2020-2022: Data collection and processing Human-Lion Interaction Study and Management Plan • July 22, 2020: Board approval of contract • 2020-2025: Public outreach • 2020-2025: Implementation of study with annual updates to Board • 2025: Receive management plan Attachments: 1. Resource Management Policies 2. District letter of support for evaluation of listing mountain lions 3. Wildlife Response Protocols Responsible Department Heads: Kirk Lenington, Natural Resources Manager Prepared by: Matt Sharp Chaney, Resource Management Specialist II RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES JULY 2018 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Board of Directors: Ward 1, Pete Siemens Ward 2, Yoriko Kishimoto Ward 3, Jed Cyr Ward 4, Curt Riffle Ward 5, Karen Holman Ward 6, Larry Hassett Ward 7, Zoe Kersteen-Tucker General Manager: Ana Maria Ruiz ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 1 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................... II PREFACE ............................................................................................... IV I.DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ................ 1 II.VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ................................................... 6 III.WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT ........................................................ 12 IV.INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT ....................................... 18 V.WATER RESOURCES .............................................................. 23 VI.GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................. 31 VII.SCENIC AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES ................................ 35 VIII.CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ................................ 39 IX.RESEARCH AND COLLECTION OF INFORMATION .............. 48 X.PUBLIC INTERPRETATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION .............................................................................. 51 XI.GRAZING MANAGEMENT ........................................................ 55 XII.FOREST MANAGEMENT .......................................................... 60 XIII.ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION ................................................... 69 XIV.HABITAT CONNECTIVITY ........................................................ 72 XV.WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT ............................................ 78 XVI.CLIMATE CHANGE ................................................................... 86 XVII.GLOSSARY ............................................................................... 90 XVIII.REFERENCES ......................................................................... 105 APPENDIX A. CEQA CRITERIA .......................................................... 106 ATTACHMENT 1 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DISTRICT STAFF Ana Ruiz, Planning Manager Brian Malone, Skyline Area Superintendent Casey Cleve, GIS Coordinator Cindy Roessler, Senior Resource Management Specialist Clayton Koopman, Resource Specialist Craig Beckman, Maintenance and Resource Supervisor David Sanguinetti, Operations Manager Deane Little, (former) Board member Duncan Simmons, (former) Assistant General Counsel Erica Simmons, (former) Open Space Planner Galli Basson, Planning Technician Jeannie Buscaglia, Administrative Assistant Julie Andersen, Resource Planner Ken Nitz, (former) Board President Kirk Lenington, Senior Resource Planner Kristi Britt, Public Affairs Specialist Lisa Infante Bankosh, Open Space Planner Mary Davey, (former) Board President Matt Baldzikowski, Resource Planner Matt Freeman, (former) Planning Manager Meredith Manning, Senior Planner Mike Williams, Real Property Manager Renee Fitzsimons, Docent Program Coordinator Rudy Jurgensen, Public Affairs Manager Stan Hooper, Maintenance and Resource Supervisor Stella Cousins, (former) Resource Planner Sue Schectman, General Counsel CONSULTANTS AND PARTNERS Alida Bray, President and CEO, History of San Jose ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANGEMENT POLICIES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii Chris Spohrer, Resource Ecologist, California State Parks Darrell Wolf, Battalion Chief, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) Dr. Grey Hayes, Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve Dr. Jennifer Parke, Professor of Ecology, Oregon State University Dr. Jerry Franklin, Professor of Ecosystem Analysis, University of Washington Dr. Orrin Sage, Principal, Sage Agricultural Services Dr. Susan Frankel, Director Sudden Oak Death Research, US Forest Service Gail Raabe, Agricultural Commissioner, San Mateo County Jack Olsen (former) Executive Administrator, San Mateo County Farm Bureau Jonathan Owens, Hydrologist/Engineer, Balance Hydrologics, Inc. Laura Jones, Director of Heritage Services, Stanford University Elizabeth Clevenger, Archaeological Collections Specialist, Presidio Trust Mark Hylkema, Archeologist, California State Parks Paul Ringold, Director, Land Stewardship, Peninsula Open Space Trust Tim Frahm, Director Conservation & Agricultural Water Quality Program, San Mateo County Farm Bureau Tim Hyland, Resource Ecologist, California State Parks ATTACHMENT 1 iv PREFACE ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT Document Purpose This Resource Management Policies (RMPs) document defines the poli- cies and practices used by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) to protect and manage resources on District lands. The word resources as used in this document includes plants, animals, water, soil, terrain, geologic formations, historic, scenic, and cultural features. Rec- reational resources are described in other documents.1 The purpose of the RMPs is to: ♦ Set the framework for the District's resource management program; ♦ Provide general guidance for issue-specific and site-specific planning; ♦ Provide staff and Board a tool for informed, consistent, and effective re- source management decision making; ♦ Inform the public of the purpose and intent of the District's resource management program; ♦ Provide a basis for evaluating the District's progress in reaching its re- source management objectives. This document does not provide detailed plans for management of individ- ual preserves or resources. Other more specific master plans, site plans, and resource management plans will supplement these policies to further refine and resolve the implementation strategies on a site-specific basis. The suitability and scope of implementation of a specific RMP can only be effectively determined on a site-specific or issue-specific basis given the 1 These documents include Use and Management Plans for individual preserves, Trail Use Guidelines and Mitigation Measures, Land Use Regulations and the Visitor's Guide to the Open Space Preserves. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANGEMENT POLICIES PREFACE v circumstances and conditions to be addresses. The suitability or effective- ness of a RMP may depend on a number of factors. These may include evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with the RMP, physical or other constraints, availability of funding, and feasibility of im- plementation. Therefore, the determination of whether and to what extent a RMP is implemented in whole or in part will be made on a site-or issue- specific basis. In some circumstances, deviations from an RMP will repre- sent a more effective resource management approach given applicable factors. In addition, carrying out and implementing RMPs will be achieved over time, and is subject to funding availability and competing District needs and overall feasibility. Competition for District funds requires balancing the expense of resource management with the cost of continued land acquisi- tion, project planning, and the cost of access and facilities improvements. Document Organization The RMPs are organized into chapters by subject and resource category. The chapter format generally consists of a background section and a sec- tion containing goals, policies, and implementation measures. The back- ground section provides rationale for the goal and policies that follow. The goal is phrased as a broad, general statement describing the desired state or condition to be achieved. The policies state what steps the District will take in order to attain that goal. Policies are numbered according to chap- ter with the first letter of each of the fist two words of the Chapter title followed by a number (e.g. VM-1 is Vegetation Management Policy 1). Each policy includes one or more recommended implementation measures, highlighted by bullets (). Implementation measures specify action items the District will strive to carry out to apply the policies to the landscape where feasible. Implementation measures are referenced in- ternally according to bullets. For instance, VM-1: Measure 2 refers to the second bulleted measure under VM-1. Informational sidebars identify cur- rent knowledge and practices regarding resource conservation. Key words are noted in bold and definitions for each can be found in the Glossary. The District will apply the RMPs to every day District functions and opera- tions from the planning of new trails and facilities to the evaluation of new ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANA GEMENT POLICIES PREFACE vi prospective land acquisitions, to routine Preserve maintenance. It will draw upon varied expertise to balance resource needs and public inter- ests. The annual action plan will describe existing and proposed resource management plans and projects, and progress towards resource manage- ment goals. Document Review and Amendment The RMPs comprise a "living" document that will grow and change regu- larly, based on new experience and information. It will be reviewed and updated every five to ten years and chapters amended as needed to re- spond to ever-changing resource conditions (e.g. insect or disease out- breaks, large cataclysmic events, climate change etc.). The staff or Board may decide to amend the document for a significant single purpose at any time. ATTACHMENT 1 1 I. DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) is a public agency that owns and manages 26 open space preserves totaling over 59,000 acres of land (as of 2011). Created by a voter initiative in 1972, the Dis- trict's mission statement is “To acquire and preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity; protect and restore the natural environ- ment; and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive public enjoyment and education.” District boundaries enclose an area of 227,900 acres in northern Santa Clara and southern San Mateo counties, and a small portion of Santa Cruz County. The District’s Sphere of Influence, or the area within which the District is likely to expand, includes an additional 12,333 acres. Extending from Montara in the north to the Lexington Hills in the south, the District directly serves more than 25 communities having a combined population of over 700,000. Preserves vary in size from 59 acres (Stevens Creek Nature Study Area) to over 17,000 acres (Sierra Azul). Elevations range from sea level in the baylands preserves to 3,486 feet atop Mount Umunhum in the Sierra Azul Range. The District manages land primarily to preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land. There are few improvements, other than parking areas, some rest rooms, and informational signs. Over 220 miles of public trails invite activities such as hiking, biking, jogging, horseback riding, dog walk- ing, and picnicking limited only as required. The preserves are open to the public every day, free of charge. Because the preserves are “close to home,” they serve as popular weekday and weekend recreational destina- tions. District lands protect a variety of habitats rich in both numbers and variety of plants and animals. The District preserves tidal salt marshes in the east, home to the endangered clapper rail and salt marsh harvest mouse and ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2 used by thousands of migratory birds. The heart of the District straddles the eastern and western flanks of the Santa Cruz Mountains. These lands are covered in a diverse mix of oak woodland, grassland, chaparral, coastal scrub, and both evergreen and coniferous forests that form an impressive scenic backdrop for the densely populated San Francisco Bay Area and Central California Coast. Creeks and streams that run through District lands provide refuge area for endangered coho salmon and threat- ened steelhead trout. The natural setting of District preserves provides a peaceful refuge for visitors seeking low intensity recreational opportunities away from the pressures of urban life. PURPOSES OF OPEN SPACE Open space consists of land and water areas that remain in a natural state and are minimally developed. Open space may include compatible agri- culture uses. Open space preserves provide protection in the form of per- manent sanctuaries for native wildlife and vegetation. These irreplacea- ble resources are rapidly disappearing as human presence and activity encroach into natural areas. Reasons to preserve open space that are discussed in the District's Master Plan include protecting scenic beauty, public health and safety, natural, cultural and agriculture resources; shap- ing urban growth; and providing low-intensity outdoor recreation opportu- nities and environmental education. NEED FOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES Resource management at the District includes management of both natu- ral cultural and agricultural resources. Natural resource management gen- erally consists of protecting, restoring, enhancing, and monitoring native vegetation and wildlife, and monitoring and protecting the quality of geo- ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 3 logical and hydrological conditions. Cultural resource management con- sists of identifying and evaluating and protecting archeological sites and cultural landscapes. The District faces many issues, challenges, and choices in management of District land and sensitive resources. Land acquisition is politically, so- cially, and opportunistically driven, sometimes independent of resource needs. Defining, identifying and communicating resource needs and man- agement objectives provides for more informed decision making, guides property acquisition, and results in better protection of land and sensitive natural and cultural resources. The complex and constantly changing ecosystems of District preserves are comprised of a wide variety of interrelated components resources that sometimes have competing needs for preservation. Managers must be able to recognize, distinguish, and decide among competing priorities. Compounding these inherent challenges is the change in open space management needs over time: the amount of land managed by the District continues to grow; employees and board members who function as care- takers change; funding sources come and go; and the public's interests, values, and use patterns differ over both time and place; and visitation continues to increase which can place increased pressure upon natural systems. A well-defined set of policies is essential for the District to main- tain consistent and effective resource management despite these changes. The Basic Policy adopted March 10, 1999 directs the District to: “follow management policies that ensure proper care of the land, that provide public access appropriate to the nature of the land, and that are consistent with ecological values and public safety.” Although the Basic Policy implies a direction for managing the land, it does not offer specific guidance as to what constitutes “proper care.” These RMPs are intended to provide that guidance. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 4 MISSION STATEMENT FOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT The resource management mission statement defines the purpose toward which the District directs its resource management efforts. The District's resource management program is one of stewardship not only intended to protect resources and to sustain them in perpetuity. The District calls its lands “preserves” rather than “parks,” emphasizing the goal of resource preservation. The following overall mission statement reflects the District's commitment to resource management: Resource Management Mission Statement The District will protect and restore the diversity and integrity of its re- sources and ecological processes for their value to the environment and to people, and will provide for the use of the preserves consistent with resource protection. Overall Resource Management Strategies The following general strategies summarize how the District will achieve its resource management mission. Strategy 1 Favor protection of resources when use significantly inter- feres with resource protection and preservation. Strategy 2 Provide an effective interdisciplinary program to protect and enhance natural and cultural resources. This pro- gram should include planning, interpretation, research, protection, maintenance, and monitoring practices. Strategy 3 Prevent or minimize human-caused and accelerated im- pacts, including erosion, invasion by non-native species, disruption of the natural flow of water, degradation of wa- ter quality, trampling of vegetation, and displacement of wildlife. Strategy 4 Protect and restore known rare, endangered, special sta- tus species and sensitive habitats, as well as seriously ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 5 degraded or deteriorating areas. Give priority to sensitive habitats and consider the relative scarcity of the specific resources involved. Strategy 5 Manage open space as a composite resource, rather than as separate and isolated parts. Maintain ecological pro- cesses as well as individual species and features. Con- sider the regional context and cumulative impacts of re- source management decisions. Favor long-term goals over short-term benefits. Strategy 6 Support low intensity recreational and agricultural use of District lands consistent with resource protection. Con- sider present and potential use. Strategy 7 Balance efforts to protect and restore resources with ef- forts to acquire and provide public access to lands. Strategy 8 Monitor changing conditions and the effectiveness of re- source management practices. Strategy 9 Increase public knowledge, understanding, and apprecia- tion of the natural and cultural resources of the preserves, and support for their conservation. PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION The RMPs are to be used to guide the overall planning, budgeting, and decision making processes for individual Preserves and for District-wide programs. Implementation of the policies will be through the Use and Man- agement Plan and Master Plan for each Preserve. The District’s Land Ac- quisition Policies shall reference the RMPs to help guide future land ac- quisitions. Successful implementation of the Policies will result in informed, consistent, and effective resource management. ATTACHMENT 1 6 II. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND District Plant Communities The District is located along the western edge of the North American con- tinent on a geologically active peninsula between the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, which limits migration of plants and animals. This unique location is dominated by the Santa Cruz Mountains which are in- fluenced by a Mediterranean climate comprised of mild wet winters and long hot and dry summers cooled by cyclical coastal fog. Because of this climate regime, the landscape is subject to periodic fire. The San Andreas Fault, one of the world's longest and most active faults, cuts through the eastern side of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Continuing movement along the fault and differing composition of the underlying rocks created many soil types and terrain features including steep, narrow canyons, rolling hills, and flat bay lands. The eastern edge of the District is heavily influ- enced by the urban areas of San Francisco, San Jose and other peninsula cites which result in natural lands that are often used as a large “urban backyard” rather than a pristine wilderness. These and other factors have shaped diverse and dynamic native plant communities that are precisely adapted to these complex and varied conditions. A plant community is a group of plants growing in an interrelated manner on a particular site. Each community has characteristic dominant and as- sociated species, spacing, and habitat. Native plant communities in District preserves include the following gen- eral vegetation types: ♦ Salt marsh and brackish marsh ♦ Freshwater marsh ♦ Redwood forest ♦ Douglas fir forest ♦ Coastal scrub ♦ Chaparral ♦ Mixed evergreen forest ♦ Riparian forest ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 7 ♦ Native grassland ♦ Oak woodland The condition of vegetation affects other resources in the preserves. A mixture of natural plant communities gives scenic character to a land- scape, and provides the diversity and stability needed to support native wildlife, clean water and reduce erosion. Loss or fragmentation of plant communities reduces their ability to provide the full range of ecological benefits, including maintenance of species diversity, soil and watershed protection, wildlife, and recreational and aesthetic values. It is the main reason why animal species have become endangered or threatened. Alterations to Vegetation Continuing effects of past and present land use practices, including fire suppression, grazing, logging, non-native plant invasion, feral animals, and uses which trample vegetation, threaten the District's native plant communities. Such activities have caused drastic and rapid changes in vegetation. In some areas the alteration is permanent. Protection of Sensitive Species A number of plants listed by either federal or State agencies or the Cali- fornia Native Plant Society as rare, threatened, endangered, and of limited distribution have been identified within or near District preserves. Site- specific information is needed for both existing and new properties to pro- tect sensitive species. Ecological Restoration Ecological restoration is the process of returning land that has been de- graded and disturbed into ecologically functioning habitat. The District of- ten employs the principles of ecological restoration when performing veg- etation management. Vegetation management is the maintenance, es- tablishment, or restoration of target vegetation that meets a preserve's management objectives. The term revegetation is used to describe the process of replacing existing vegetation or bare ground on a site with ap- Ecological restoration is an intentional activity initiated by the District that accelerates the recovery of an ecosystem with respect to its health, integrity and sustainability. Frequently, ecosystems requiring restoration have been degraded, damaged, transformed, or destroyed by direct and indirect human actions. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 8 propriate plant species. Selecting effective vegetation management strat- egies requires understanding natural ecological processes at a specific site. It also may involve coordinating with neighbors, as part of the Dis- trict's "good neighbor" policy. The District applies ecological restoration when it replaces landscaping with native vegetation, stabilizes slopes or restores degraded sites with natural drainage patterns. Management measures may include actions such as eliminating or re- stricting activities that destroy vegetation, restoring grasslands and mead- ows that were formerly maintained by natural processes, conducting pre- scribed burns, managing conservation grazing, and either planting or re- moving vegetation. Fire Suppression Periodic fires were a part of natural ecological processes on lands which now make up the District preserves. As a result, many species evolved with fire adaptations and need periodic fire for renewal. Fire opens forests to new generations of younger trees, purges grassland of invasive shrubs, and stimulates seed germination and shoot growth in chaparral. Without fire, fire-adapted communities are eventually replaced by forest, and plant and animal species are lost. Fuel in unburned areas can build up to such a high level that when a wildfire occurs, it can have devastating effects. Local Native Americans allowed natural fires to burn and also deliberately set fires to clear underbrush and create meadow areas attractive to deer and other animals. Open meadows improved visibility for hunting and en- couraged the growth of acorn oaks and other edible plants. Subsequent implementation of fire suppression policies eliminated these benefits, re- versing their positive environmental effects. Impacts of fire suppression continue to reduce biodiversity in the pre- serves. Grasslands and oak woodlands are decreasing in area due to invading brush and forest species. Stands of coastal scrub and chaparral have aged and are not being renewed. Dense tangles of brush and young trees have largely replaced the park-like understory beneath redwood and Douglas fir forests and mature oak woodlands described by early Euro- pean explorers. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 9 High Use Areas High use areas such as those around parking lots, visitor centers, re- strooms, and specially surfaced or whole access trails, require more inten- sive vegetation management than natural areas that make up the bulk of District land. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal VM- Sustain and promote viable and diverse native plant communities characteristic of the region Policy VM-1 Maintain the diversity of native plant communities. (See WR- 7, ES-1, IS-2, and FM-6) ♦ Map and describe plant communities; analyze successional trends and formulate site-specific vegetation management goals as part of the Resource Management Plan for a preserve or geographic area. ♦ Identify appropriate areas for restoring lost or altered native plant com- munities and restore them to a natural condition. This is often best done by restoring natural processes and controlling invasive plants, rather than by planting. ♦ Manage native grassland sites to encourage reestablishment and per- petuation of California native grasses. ♦ Manage oak woodland to encourage reestablishment and perpetua- tion of California native oaks. ♦ Control invasive non-native plants. (See Section VI.) Policy VM-2 Use native species occurring naturally on similar sites in ecological restoration projects. ♦ Use seed and cuttings collected from the same geographic area to revegetate or enhance degraded areas. One source of native seed is topsoil or mulch taken from adjacent intact habitat and applied thinly. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 10 ♦ Use fill, mulch, and seed mixtures that are as free as possible of non- native plants in ecological restoration projects. Know where such ma- terials come from. (See GS-2 for possible exception.) ♦ Work with nurseries to grow native plants needed for ecological resto- ration projects. ♦ Avoid seeding with rye grass (unless sterile), "Zorro" fescue, Harding grass, or other non-native aggressive plants after fires to control ero- sion. ♦ Use plant material that is biologically and visually appropriate to the surrounding wild landscape and appropriate to the stage of plant com- munity development at the site. ♦ Encourage District tenants to use native plants for landscaping to pro- vide natural habitat. Policy VM-3 Protect and enhance the habitats and populations of special status plant species. ♦ Identify the location and condition of special status plants and their habitats as part of the Resource Management Plan for a preserve or geographical area. ♦ Conduct surveys for special status plants during the appropriate sea- son before significant site-specific development or any unusual antic- ipated increase in use. Modify the project or use to avoid impacting such plants. ♦ Protect areas with special status species from human activities and other negative impacts such as erosion. Examples of protective measures include trail rerouting, signs, and fencing. (See GS-2) Policy VM-4 Manage forest diseases, when necessary, to protect native biological diversity and critical ecosystem functions. ♦ Develop a plan to detect, report, and monitor areas infested by high priority insects and diseases; utilize sanitation and best management practices (BMPs) to control the spread of infestations; train staff and educate the public; and support research to guide land management decisions. Special status species are species that are state or federally listed as threatened, rare, endangered, species of special concern, candidate species, or those plant species listed by the California Native Plant Society’s list 1B and 2. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 11 ♦ Prioritize research and management activities to slow the spread of Sudden Oak Death (SOD) and actively pursue partnerships with other public agencies to develop treatment alternatives. Sudden Oak Death (SOD) is a prevalent disease of particular concern within District forested lands. SOD has killed over one million native oak and tanoak trees and infests many other forest species in one Oregon and 14 coastal California counties. Hundreds of dead tanoak trees and other symptoms of the SOD pathogen, Phytophthora ramorum, are commonly seen on the District’s preserves. There currently is no cure for SOD, and as with other extensive forest diseases, a strategy may take decades to develop. The District has adopted a ten-year plan to slow the spread of SOD, collaboratively study impacts on wildland ecology and recreation, and develop a restoration strategy for heavily infested forests. ATTACHMENT 1 12 III. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT As pressures from the expanding human population increase, District pre- serves become more important as refuges for wildlife. The term wildlife as used here includes all animals, from the smallest invertebrates to the largest mammals. Without a sufficient amount of proper habitat, an ani- mal cannot survive. As a result, most management of native wildlife in- volves management of habitat conditions and habitat impacts from visitor activities rather than hands-on management of the animals themselves. Protection of habitat is key to protection of wildlife. BACKGROUND Animal Habitat Characteristics Habitat refers to the area where an organism occurs, its natural home or "neighborhood." An animal's habitat includes plant communities which provide the shelter, food, and water it needs to live and reproduce. Other aspects of the environment that affect an organism, such as geographic location, climate, and topography, are also part of its habitat. Animals move from place to place and require a variety of land, both daily and seasonally. Some have precise habitat requirements; others are more flexible. Some species live their entire lives within one vegetation type. Others use several vegetation types in a single day or use different habi- tats at different stages of their lives. Some animals use one habitat for part of the year and migrate elsewhere for the rest. Ultimately it is important to preserve all these habitats to ensure continued wildlife diversity. The habitats most important for wildlife are those which offer food, cover, topography, and other parameters essential to survival and reproduction. Examples include springs and seeps, nesting and breeding sites such as standing dead trees, movement and migration corridors, pathways to per- ennial streams, and foraging areas. Some of these habitats are consid- ered sensitive, in that they are vulnerable to disturbance and do not re- cover easily once disturbed. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 13 The Importance of Riparian, Pond, and O ther Wetland Habitats Certain habitats are intensively used by many kinds of wildlife. Riparian (streamside), pond, and other wetland habitat, with their wide variety of plants and readily available water, are perhaps the most important. These habitats provide a drinking source; dense, green foliage for cover and food; shade in which to rest and escape the heat; perennial or seasonal water bodies which are required for breeding by some amphibian and other wildlife species, and protected corridors through dry, open areas. Almost all species of wildlife depend on external sources of water and will often travel long distances to reach it. People are also attracted to water, especially ponds and riparian areas. Excessive human use can cause problems from trampling, soil compaction, destruction of vegetation, alter- ation of water quality and temperature, introduction of pathogens or foreign substances and species, and frequent disturbance of wildlife. Predators Indicate Habitat Health The presence of large predators is a strong indicator of a healthy habitat. Large predators are at the top of the food pyramid and depend on the availability of large numbers of smaller animals. The greenbelts of District and neighboring public lands in the Skyline and Sierra Azul areas are large and diverse enough to support such wide-ranging predators as black bear (although no resident black bears are present in the Santa Cruz Mountains presently), mountain lion, coyote, bobcat, fox, badgers, and numerous hawks and owls. The chance to see such animals is a big incentive for many people to visit the preserves. Results of Habitat Fragmentation In the last century, population growth, urban expansion, and construction of roads and highways have fragmented habitats and interrupted wildlife movement corridors. Fragmentation has four main consequences for wild- life: ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 14 a. Isolated habitat patches may not be large enough to support wildlife that requires a certain size of habitat. Fragmentation may also destroy particular plant species that some animals require for food or cover. b. Wide-ranging animals such as the larger predators can be cut off from territories they need for feeding and breeding. c. Non-native species become more common, displacing natives and thereby also reducing biodiversity. d. Inbreeding increases when populations are cut off from neighboring populations. The resulting lack of diversity in the gene pool weakens the species through “inbreeding depression” and reduces the popula- tion's long-term chance of survival. A single environmental change or disease could then eliminate all members of the local population. WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal WM- Maintain and promote healthy and diverse native wildlife populations Policy WM-1 Understand and maintain the diversity of native wildlife. (See WR-6 and WR-7) ♦ Identify wildlife usage, movement patterns, and habitat features with high value to wildlife. ♦ Consider and avoid or minimize impacts on wildlife when planning trails and other facilities. ♦ Develop a wildlife data base to record wildlife sightings and guide management decisions. ♦ Non-native wildlife release on District lands shall adhere to the policies identified in the Integrated Pest Management chapter (See IPM). ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 15 ♦ The District shall strive to control or remove non native wildlife using management actions identified in the Integrated Pest Management chapter (See IPM). ♦ Native wildlife shall not be released onto District land if it is adapted to urban conditions or interaction with human. ♦ Native wildlife can be released onto District preserves if the animal has been rehabilitated by an animal rescue center specializing in wild- life, it is disease-free, suitable unoccupied habitat is available, and there is a high likelihood for the animal to adapt and survive in its new surroundings without adversely affecting existing resources at the site. The rehabilitated animal should be marked or banded, if feasible, to allow monitoring of its adaptation. Policy WM-2 Protect, maintain and enhance habitat features that have particular value to native wildlife. (See HC-2: Measure 5, WR-6 and WR-7) ♦ Inventory critical and sensitive wildlife habitats and develop manage- ment strategies for their protection. ♦ Leave brush piles, snags, and fallen trees in areas where they do not pose a fire hazard or visual blight, to provide cover and nesting sites for animals, and nursery conditions for forest seedlings. ♦ Evaluate the wildlife habitat value associated with human-made struc- tures before altering or removing them and avoid or mitigate any im- pacts. ♦ Repair, modify, and maintain stock ponds as wildlife watering sources and habitat for aquatic and semi aquatic organisms (See WR-3). Policy WM-3 Protect animal populations against the impact of human ac- tions. (See HC-2: Measure 5) ♦ Discourage human intrusion into sensitive wildlife habitats by appro- priate placement of facilities and trails. ♦ Identify and eliminate barriers (e.g. remove unnecessary fences, old barb wire, and other barriers) and provide safe crossings (e.g. protect Examples of wildlife using human-made structures on District lands include the Red barn at La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve which is used by both the Townsend's big-eared bat (Plecotus townsendii) and Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus). Wildlife movement and safe passage is affected at a regional level by large-scale transportation needs and development including housing, roadways, and commercial development. The District works with Preserve neighbors, municipalities, counties, and regional planning organizations to improve new development projects through the use of wildlife friendly fencing, clustering new development away from sensitive areas, and providing refuge areas for wildlife. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 16 established wildlife crossings and use wildlife friendly fencing) to en- hance wildlife movement on a regional basis. (See HC-3, HC-4, and GM-2: Measure 1) ♦ Consult with responsible wildlife agencies to conserve special status species or to control problem wildlife when human life, property, or other significant natural resources are threatened. ♦ Reduce conflicts between wildlife and humans through notification and education, control of human access and, as a last resort, control of wildlife presence or movement. ♦ Prohibit hunting or trapping in District preserves except as a manage- ment tool or for scientific or educational purposes. ♦ Fishing is allowed only in areas declared by the District to be permitted fishing areas, where state laws regulate the taking of game fish. ♦ Review and update criteria for designating temporary (e.g., day-use) access areas for domestic animals into District preserves. Incorporate the criteria into District regulations. Policy WM-4 Protect and enhance the habitats and populations of special status animal species. ♦ Conduct surveys of special status animals in affected areas before initiating significant development or any substantial increase in use. Give priority to protection of special status species. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 17 This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT 1 18 IV. INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND Integrated Pest Management Integrated pest management (IPM) is a process for efficiently managing pests while protecting human health and environmental quality. IPM is a long-term, science-based, decision-making system that uses a specific methodology to manage damage from target pests. IPM requires monitor- ing site conditions before, during, and after treatment to determine if objec- tives are being met and if methods need to be revised. IPM requires that non-chemical methods be considered in addition to chemical methods (i.e., pesticides, herbicides, insecticides). If chemical methods are necessary to meet a pest control objective, the potential for harm to the public and work- ers are carefully considered, as are effects on the environment and non- target organisms, and then the least toxic and most effective, efficient, and target-specific method is chosen. The Problem with Invasive Species Invasive species are animal or plant species that invade and dominate sufficiently large areas causing a reduction in biodiversity. They prolifer- ate in the absence of natural control and interfere with the natural pro- cesses that would otherwise occur on wildlands. Once established, inva- sive species can become difficult to manage and they can eliminate native species or otherwise alter the ecosystem. This chapter addresses the management of invasive species in order to protect the native species and natural processes of the preserves. Invasive species can alter ecosystem processes by changing biotic ecosystem characteristics (such as plant community composition, structure, and interactions; trophic relationships; and genetic integrity) and abiotic characteristics and processes (such as fire regimes, erosion, sedimentation, hydrological regimes, nutrient and mineral conditions, and light availability). Pesticide is a broad term that includes any material (natural, organic, or synthetic) used to control or prevent pests including herbicides (weed or plant killers), insecticides (insect killers), and rodenticides (rodent killers) as a few examples. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT 19 Invasive Plants Invasive plants have greatly altered many of California's natural plant communities. Because they originated elsewhere, many invasive plants are not susceptible to predation or diseases of this region. They are ex- tremely adaptable and can thrive in a wide range of conditions. They can grow quickly, reproduce early, produce many long-lasting seeds, and tol- erate disturbance. They reduce native biodiversity by gradually crowding out or competing with native plants for water and sun, and by reducing or modifying wildlife habitat. Invasive Animals Ranking second to loss of habitat resulting from human intrusion, invasive animals pose another threat to native wildlife. Escaped domestic animals and other non-native wildlife species can thrive in the favorable climate of the San Francisco peninsula. Once established in a preserve, they com- pete for valuable resources and disturb the sensitive balance of natural food webs. Bullfrogs and wild pigs are examples of invasive introduced animals found in District preserves that physically displace or predate upon native plants and wildlife. Programs to manage pests require long-term commitment. With many in- vasive plant and animal species, short-term lapses in management activity may negate years of expensive control programs. Wild (feral) pigs are an example of an invasive wildlife species with obvious impact on District lands. They have been widespread in the central coast of California since about 1970, reproduce rapidly, dig up meadows and wetlands, and carry diseases that can affect people and livestock. They eat acorns, bulbs, and soil animals, and are difficult to control. Feral pigs were abundant in the South Skyline region in the 1990s. The District has been trapping feral pigs since 2000 and has substantially reduced their population and damage from their rooting. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT 20 INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal IPM- Control pests by consistent implementation of IPM principles to protect and restore the natural envi- ronment and provide for human safety and enjoy- ment while visiting and working on District lands. Policy IPM-1 Develop specific pest management strategies and priori- ties that address each of the five work categories. ♦ Manage pests in buildings to support existing uses, while also pro- tecting human health and surrounding natural resources. ♦ Manage pests and potential human interactions in recreational fa- cilities to minimize conflict, ensure visitor safety and enjoyment, and protect the surrounding natural resources. ♦ Manage pests in fuel management areas to reduce risk to human life and property, while also protecting natural resources. ♦ Manage pests in rangelands and on agricultural properties to sup- port existing uses, while also protecting human health and sur- rounding natural resources. ♦ Manage invasive species in natural areas and set priorities for their control based on the potential risk to sensitive native species and loss of native biodiversity. Policy IPM-2 Take appropriate actions to prevent the introduction of new pest species to District preserves, especially new invasive plants in natural areas, rangelands, and agricultural proper- ties. Best management practices for preventing the introduction of invasive species include cleaning equipment before leaving a weedy site, and using seed, plant, forage, fill, erosion- control and other materials that are free of weed seeds. The California Invasive Plant Council maintains an Invasive Plant Inventory that rates the threat of non-native plant species by evaluating their ecological impacts, invasive potential and ecological distribution. Along with local knowledge, the District uses this list to evaluate the invasive risk of existing and new non-native plants found on District preserves. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT 21 Policy IPM-3 Manage pests using the procedures outlined in the following eight implementation measures. ♦ Develop and implement tolerance levels for pests within each of the Work Categories to determine when to undertake pest control. ♦ Identify the pest, determine its life cycle and disruptive poten- tial, and identify relevant site conditions prior to implementing a pest control activity. Review pest control objectives for con- sistency with other site goals and establish tolerance levels that must be exceeded before pest control is undertaken. ♦ Choose site-specific strategies and times of treatment that provide the best combination of protecting preserve re- sources, human health, and non-target organisms and that are efficient and cost effective in controlling the target pest. Whenever feasible, direct the control method narrowly at vul- nerable points in the target organism’s life cycle to avoid broad impacts. ♦ Monitor results and modify control methods over time as site conditions and treatment techniques change and as needed to obtain an effective level of control. ♦ Use the least harmful method(s) to control identified pests. Where the use of pesticides is necessary, apply according to the label using all safety precautions and take all measures needed to protect the environment, the health and safety of visitors, employees, neighbors, and the surrounding natural areas including water and soil resources. ♦ Plan for repeat treatments as indicated by the pest’s regener- ative capabilities. ♦ Coordinate and cooperate with adjacent landowners, neigh- bors, and other responsible agencies to control pests and limit secondary effects. ♦ If eradication of a pest from a distinct location is not feasible, apply measures to achieve containment, sustained control, slow down a pest’s rate of spread, or minimize pest damage. Policy IPM-4 Monitor pest occurrences and results of control actions and use adaptive management to improve results. Prior to the approval of the use of any new biological control agent, the US and California Departments of Agriculture conduct years of laboratory and field studies to assess the candidate’s host specificity and its potential impact on target and nontarget species and environmental safety. The District coordinates with the San Mateo County and Santa Clara County Weed Management Areas, the California Invasive Plant Council, the California Department of Fish and Game, the California Department of Food and Agriculture, County Agricultural Departments, and the Cooperative Extension Service to stay informed on invasive plants and animals, IPM techniques, and pesticide regulations. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT 22 Policy IPM-5 Develop and implement an IPM Guidance Manual to stand- ardize pest management and IPM procedures across all District Lands. ATTACHMENT 1 23 V. WATER RESOURCES BACKGROUND Water is essential to life on earth and is also one of the most important forces shaping habitats and biodiversity. District open space lands con- tain a variety of water resources that include such diverse habitats as freshwater wetlands (including ponds and seasonal wetlands) and water- courses, salt water tidal wetlands within San Francisco Bay, and ground- water resources such as springs, seeps, and underground aquifers. These water resources have natural, scenic, recreational, scientific, and educa- tional values. In general, this policy will discuss waters (sag ponds, artifi- cial impoundments, lakes, and aquifers), watercourses (such as streams and creeks), and wetlands. These terms are discussed further below. “Waters” is a term that is broadly used to describe all aquatic systems. This policy defines “waters” as areas of standing water, both seasonal and permanent, such as lakes and ponds, as well as underground aquifers. “Watercourse” is a generic term used to define any land feature that con- veys concentrated water flow, regardless of whether the water flow is ephemeral, intermittent, or perennial. “Wetlands” are distinguished by the presence of water, either at the surface or within the root zone. Wetlands have unique soil conditions that differ from adjacent uplands and support vegetation adapted to wet conditions. Wetlands provide critical ecological functions and habitat for a variety of fish, wildlife, and plant species Wetlands are lands that are transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems. The water table is usually at or near the surface, or land is cov- ered by shallow water. Some functions of wetlands include the following: provide habitat for fish and aquatic wildlife, offer foraging habitat or water for terrestrial wildlife and birds, absorb flood waters, reduce erosion, re- charge aquifers, cleanse pollutants, provide aesthetic values, support unique plant associations, and provide habitat for many rare species of plants and wildlife. In California, wetlands of all types have been greatly reduced in area from their historic extent and are being rapidly lost or ad- versely impacted. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 24 Watersheds Within the District District Preserves are located within 22 major watersheds extending from the Pacific Ocean in San Mateo County to the baylands in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. Watersheds are land or “basins” within which all precipitation within a given watershed drains to a single body of water, often a creek or stream. Many of the District’s lands are located within the headwaters or uppermost sections of these watersheds. Most preserve watersheds contain steep ridges and deep canyons typical of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Rainfall occurs mostly between November and April with seasonal rainfall totals varying greatly within the District. The greatest rainfall quantities occur along the west facing slopes near the summit of the mountain range where totals can reach 40 to 50 inches per year, however, averages around 20 to 30 inches per year are more typical. In the Santa Cruz Mountains, fog accounts for approximately 10-20 inches of this precipitation, much of which is delivered in the dry summer months. Many smaller creeks and streams are intermittent, reflecting this seasonal distribution of rainfall. Winter flows are higher, especially during and im- mediately following storms. The Influence of Water Movement Water flows in predictable patterns on the surface, through rocks beneath the soil, and in underground water tables. Plants and animals are adapted to specific movement patterns of water, sediment, and nutrients occurring in their area. A significant change in any of these factors may reduce or eliminate original species in favor of those better able to survive in the new conditions. Maintaining and restoring hydrologic patterns is important in maintaining healthy ecosystems. The condition of soil and vegetation influences the rate at which water moves as well as its quality and quantity. Leaf litter acts as mulch that helps absorb and conserve rainwater. Maintaining a continuous cover of live and decomposing vegetation residue is the most successful long- term approach to controlling erosion and maintaining water quality and quan- tity. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 25 Water Management Within The District As rain falls on District Preserves, it is captured and transported through the ecosystem. These processes create high-quality water for the environ- ment and people. District Preserves also support groundwater recharge that helps sustain summer and fall water availability and mitigate the im- pact of drought. The District is also dependent on water to fulfill its mission. District field offices require water for employees, equipment maintenance, dust control, and fire suppression. The District manages residential properties that are often located in areas without municipal supplies, thus relying on locally, naturally occurring water sources. Grazing operations that manage grass- lands for multiple benefits require water in remote areas. Irrigation sup- ports farming that provides local food. The District manages ponds that support aquatic and terrestrial wildlife. In the semi-arid region of the Santa Cruz Mountains, restoration of stream and aquatic ecosystems is a priority for managing ecosystems. The District relies on a variety of water sources. Springs are captured and developed to provide water to people and livestock with the goal of allow- ing wildlife access to the spring water. Wells capture deeper groundwater sources and require energy to pump the water to the surface. Streamflow can be captured by small impoundments or pumps and diverted to the place it is needed. These waters are often stored to provide water during the dry seasons in tanks or ponds Water Resource Issues Wetlands and watercourses on the District’s open space lands provide valuable and increasingly scarce habitat for a variety of native plant and animal species as well as many special status species. Where aquatic habitat is not directly present on District lands, runoff from District lands supports habitats downstream, a connection that should be recognized and preserved. Issues associated with the management of water re- sources and water quality include erosion and sedimentation, excessive diversion of water for consumptive use, severe erosion following wildland fires, agricultural runoff, pesticides and fertilizers, septic system Groundwater is water that is held underground in soil or pores and crevices in bedrock Surface water is found in streams, rivers, ponds, and lakes. Springs are a type of groundwater that surfaces at a point on the land. Consumptive use is the amount of water that is used by people, livestock, or crops that is unavailable to the environment after use. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 26 wastewater disposal, stormwater runoff, flooding, drought, climate change, associated sea level rise, and chemical contamination from neighboring areas or from former use of preserve lands. WATER RESOURCES GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal WR- Protect and restore natural water courses, wet- lands and hydrologic processes Policy WR-1 Protect surface and ground water from contamination. ♦ Inventory existing facilities and uses that affect watercourses, riparian areas, and wetlands, and prepare plans for protection or restoration, as appropriate. ♦ Research and pursue cleanup of likely sources of pollution, such as buried fuel tanks, improperly dumped or stored material, and faulty waste or drainage systems. ♦ Utilize self-contained sanitary facilities or place rest rooms where they cannot contaminate water sources. ♦ Control activities having a high potential for pollution. ♦ Properly decommission abandoned septic systems and avoid water quality impacts when constructing new septic systems. Manage active and abandoned wells to avoid groundwater contamination ♦ Regulate the type and intensity of human activity on District lands to protect water quality. ♦ Review and comment on offsite land use and water management pro- jects and policies that affect District water resources. Recommend and support measures to maintain natural water quality, channel flow, and sedimentation rates on District lands. Contamination is man-made waste that has polluted the environment making it unfit or unsafe. Examples on District lands include deteriorated septic systems, underground storage tanks, leaking transformers, and trash and debris. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 27 Policy WR-2 Restore, maintain or enhance water quality on District lands. ♦ Manage vegetation to improve watershed productivity and water qual- ity. ♦ Manage agricultural leases and easements to maximize the protection and enhancement of riparian areas and water quality. ♦ Monitor sediment delivery and transport on District preserves located within watersheds identified as impaired by sediment or supportive of special status animals requiring aquatic habitat. ♦ Coordinate with agencies and organizations to establish volunteer- based monitoring programs. Participate in regional watershed man- agement activities. Policy WR-3 Restore Hydrologic Processes. ♦ Incorporate best management practices (BMPs) and develop storm- water pollution prevention plans (SWPPP) when required at staging areas. ♦ Inventory and assess roads and trails on District lands to identify sig- nificant erosion and sediment sources. Prioritize maintenance and road/trail management based on most severe erosion and sediment delivery sites. ♦ Manage human activities to control erosion--for example, abandon and where feasible restore to a natural condition poorly designed or sited roads to a natural condition, close certain trails to bicycle and equestrian use during the wet season, re-route existing trails to mini- mize erosion and sediment delivery. ♦ Restore hydrologic processes altered by past land uses by ‘slowing water, spreading it, and sinking it’ through installing erosion control materials and structures, removing culverts and drainage diversions where appropriate, and using improved drainage structures that mini- mize alteration of hydrology. ♦ Minimize soil disturbance during all construction projects. ♦ Locate new trails to minimize potential water pollution and stream bank erosion and sediment delivery. Restoration and enhancement are terms that are sometimes used interchangeably when discussing habitat improvement projects. Restoration refers to the process of returning land that has been degraded and disturbed into functional habitat. Enhancement refers to the process of altering a habitat to provide specific ecosystem functions that may be missing; typically to provide habitat for endangered species. Many of the District’s properties contain legacy logging and ranching roads that were not designed or constructed for year-round use. These road systems can greatly alter the flow of water across the land, causing erosion and sediment problems due to concentrated runoff from winter rains. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 28 ♦ Construct trails, roads, staging areas, and buildings so that streams are not permanently diverted nor interrupted, and runoff is not concen- trated. Minimize creation of impermeable surfaces. ♦ Identify and mitigate significant impacts of altered water flow on plants and animals, including aquatic organisms. Policy WR-4 Manage Water Consumption to Balance Operational and Environmental Needs. ♦ Phase in installation of water meters or other measures to monitor an- nual consumptive water use. ♦ Develop and regularly update BMPs for efficient water use in offices, field operations, residences, grazing, and farming. ♦ Evaluate and consider the environmental and operational benefits and tradeoffs of each water source for new projects. ♦ Evaluate and consider the construction and operational costs of each water source. ♦ Balance operational and consumptive use needs with the goal of maintaining healthy ecological functions. ♦ Provide technical assistance to lessees of District lands and owners of lands on which the District has an agricultural easement to secure water rights for the continuation or establishment of viable agriculture consistent with the protection of sensitive habitats (see Coastal Ser- vice Plan PA.2). Policy WR-5 Determine and maintain District water rights and utilization. ♦ Identify existing uses of surface water on newly acquired open space lands, as part of the purchase process. Protect appropriative and ri- parian water rights for appropriate and beneficial existing or possible future uses. ♦ Secure water rights for the continuation or establishment of viable ag- riculture and grazing on District land consistent with protection of sen- sitive habitats. Two types of surface water use are recognized under California law: appropriative rights and riparian rights. Appropriative rights require a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board, which grants the right to use water on parcels not adjacent to the watercourse or to store water. Riparian rights are the rights of any owner of a parcel immediately adjacent to a watercourse to use water. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 29 Policy WR-6 Preserve and enhance fisheries habitats. (See WM poli- cies). ♦ Inventory and assess stream reaches accessible to anadromous fish to identify impediments to fish passage and opportunities for habitat enhancement. ♦ Remove artificial barriers to fish passage where removal will enhance spawning and rearing habitats. ♦ Enhance spawning and rearing habitats for native fisheries through restoration. Prioritize restoration and enhancement of areas providing habitat to sensitive species. ♦ Monitor sensitive fish species populations in District waters. ♦ Monitor water quality and condition of high priority aquatic habitats as- sociated with District projects containing spawning, breeding, rearing habitat for special status fish, reptile, amphibian, or other aquatic spe- cies. ♦ Evaluate and consider the environmental benefits and construc- tion/operational costs of off-stream storage facilities to minimize stream diversion and/or allow for the release of water into natural wa- terways during low flow seasons and implement accordingly. ♦ Avoid new direct stream diversion for consumptive uses where eco- nomically feasible alternative water sources exist, or the diversion captures the majority of flows, or the aquatic habitat would be sub- stantially impaired. Explore alternate sources for existing in stream di- versions. Policy WR-7 Preserve and enhance ponds and other wetland habitats. (See VM-1 and WM policies). ♦ Maintain ponds or other water bodies as wildlife watering sources as appropriate (See WM-2). ♦ Inventory and assess ponds and wetlands to identify opportunities for habitat maintenance and enhancement. ♦ Monitor sensitive reptile, amphibian, and aquatic organism popula- tions dependent on District wetlands. Few of the ponds in the Santa Cruz Mountains are naturally occurring features. The majority of ponds were created as artificial impoundments that require ongoing management to maintain. Regardless of their origin, ponds provide wildlife access to a scarce resource (water) and greatly increase the diversity of species inhabiting the District’s lands. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WATER RESOURCES 30 ♦ Preserve ponds through maintenance of artificial impoundment struc- tures where ponds provide habitat for sensitive and other wildlife spe- cies. Policy WR-8 Develop seasonal and multi-year drought management strat- egies for District lands. ♦ Evaluate and develop where appropriate wells and springs to create resilient water supplies. ♦ Identify and curtail diversions that strain naturally limited water sources, especially those that significantly impact special status spe- cies. ♦ Evaluate and implement where appropriate additional water storage infrastructure to store water when it is naturally abundant for later use during dry seasons. ♦ Evaluate and alter as appropriate water-intensive land management practices during drought conditions to reduce overall District-wide wa- ter consumption. ATTACHMENT 1 31 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS BACKGROUND District lands include a diverse set of dynamic geological resources char- acterized by steep slopes, earthquake faults, landslides, unstable and erosive soils, and attractive but fragile rock formations. Open space is an appropriate designation for such areas. Soil – A Valuable and Fragile Resource Soil is the essential surface layer that predominates in the District Pre- serves. Soil provides the rooting medium for plants and supplies most of the nutrients they require, whether native or cultivated. As plant commu- nities mature, plant roots, surface debris, and animal remains break down and are incorporated into the soil. Over time, this organic material builds up soil structure and fertility. If depleted or lost, soil takes a long time to regenerate- often longer than a single human generation. This surface layer of the land is readily accessible and easy to disturb and therefore requires the most protection by land managers. Factors Contributing to Soil Loss In some areas, District soil erosion has been accelerated by loss of plant cover, disruption of natural drainage patterns, landslide activity and/or some types of recreational uses. Some of these are naturally occurring causes, some are natural causes accelerated by human activity. By far the largest amount of soil erosion on District lands is human-caused. Poor placement of roads or trails, shortcutting of trails, poor design, construction or placement of drainage systems, excessive grazing pressure or past cul- tivation practices, and development of facilities can accelerate natural ero- sion. These activities can destroy protective plant and mulch cover, ex- posing soil to wind and water or diverting water from natural drainages. Recovery of soils from such disturbances is slow. Monitoring, preventing, and, where necessary, remedying human-caused erosion are all important parts of the District's resource management responsibilities. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GEOLOGY AND SOILS 32 GEOLOGY AND SOILS GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal GS- Avoid or minimize soil loss and prevent or remedi- ate contamination related to human land use, and protect unique or exceptional geologic features Policy GS-1 Locate and construct facilities to avoid high-risk areas sub- ject to landslides, liquefaction, faulting, flooding and erosion. ♦ Minimize construction of major improvements (examples: buildings, roads, pipelines, and septic tanks) in landslide-prone areas, active fault zones, flood zones, and highly erodible areas. ♦ Design trails with respect to natural topography to maintain or restore natural drainage patterns as much as possible. Design roads, trails and facilities to minimize disturbance to vegetation and soil. ♦ Review available geohazard data for proposed facilities and infrastruc- ture, where geologic hazards may be present. Policy GS-2 Minimize unnatural soil erosion and sedimentation. (See VM-3: Measure 3) ♦ Monitor soil erosion and slope failure and identify areas where these processes are accelerated and causing resource damage. Utilize ex- isting information (soil maps, geologic reports etc.) to avoid construc- tion in problem areas and to identify areas with conditions that may impact existing infrastructure. ♦ Reduce human-caused erosion by identifying, limiting of eliminating the causative activity, properly locating or relocating facilities, in- stalling drainage or erosion control measures, or revegetating the area. Construct roads and trails to maintain natural drainage patterns. ♦ Reconstruct or stabilize and abandon roads and trails that display or have the potential for ongoing erosion problems. ♦ Limit agricultural activities, facility development, and trail construction in riparian and other wetland areas to protect them from disturbance. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GEOLOGY AND SOILS 33 ♦ Minimize soil disturbance associated with construction and mainte- nance operations. ♦ Seed to rehabilitate disturbed ground and lessen erosion. Time seed- ing projects to ensure adequate soil moisture for seed germination. Utilize mulch or other appropriate groundcover to reduce erosion where sediment can be delivered to a watercourse or wetland. ♦ Utilize native plants when possible for projects requiring revegetation for long-term erosion control. Non-native sterile grass seed may be used to quickly establish ground cover and reduce erosion. In areas of active livestock grazing, incorporation of non-invasive pasture grasses may be utilized. ♦ Prevent, to the extent possible, the physical removal of naturally oc- curring soil. Policy GS-3 Protect unique or exceptional geologic features from human damage. ♦ Identify locations and document the condition of unique or exceptional geologic features (example: tafoni sandstone formations, serpentine outcrops, sag ponds). ♦ Monitor such features to determine if action is needed to prevent or stop damage. ♦ Control access to features requiring protection by informing visitors, placing signs and barriers, and enforcing restrictions. ♦ Develop security protocols to limit availability and distribution of geo- graphic information for geology and soil resources to protect sites from accidental destruction, looting, and vandalism. Policy GS-4 Prevent or remediate contaminated soils ♦ Prevent the release of hazardous materials into the environment as- sociated with District operations by implementing and following Best Management Practices (BMPs) for spill prevention. ♦ Investigate areas where soil contamination may have occurred due to previous land use including: disposal sites, mining areas, or leaks from storage tanks. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GEOLOGY AND SOILS 34 ♦ Remediate areas where contaminants pose a threat to human and ecological health through implementation of recommended treatment options including biodegradation, safe removal of contaminated soils, capping of soils, or other methods as recommended by a remediation professional. ♦ Adhere to requirements outlined in soil management plans approved for the preserves. ATTACHMENT 1 35 VII. SCENIC AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES BACKGROUND The District recognizes the protection of scenic values as one of the pri- mary benefits of open space. The scenic and aesthetic resources of District lands provide physical and psychological relief from the stresses and uniformity of urban life. They also contribute to our "sense of place" - our appreciation of the qualities that set this area apart from others and make it feel like home. District preserves include a variety of natural settings and landscapes that form magnificent scenic backdrops to the urbanized peninsula. Local res- idents and visitors particularly appreciate the interplay of color, pattern, form, and light on the coastal mountains, where rugged topography, hot sun, wind, and fog combine to create dramatic and appealing contrasts in vegetation. In some cases, preserving a significant scenic or historic landscape may involve managing it to actually prevent natural succession, for example, without intervention; a shallow pond may gradually fill in and become a meadow or open grassland. Active management through vegetation maintenance or pond deepening not only promotes the scenic and aes- thetic value of a wetland setting, but may also be more beneficial to wild- life. However in most instances, restoring or mimicking natural processes can help maintain the appealing visual and biological diversity of native communities. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANGEMENT POLICY DOCUMENT SCENIC AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES 36 SCENIC AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES GOAL, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal SA- Preserve lands with natural appearance, diversity, and minimal evidence of human impacts Policy SA-1 Minimize evidence of human impacts within preserves. ♦ Clarify and document appropriate standards for designing and locating trails, parking areas, and buildings. ♦ Locate trails to minimize their visibility from a distance. ♦ Where feasible, locate telecommunication towers, power lines, water towers, firebreaks, and other infrastructure along margins of roads, next to existing structures or where vegetation and terrain help ease undesirable visual and environmental impacts. Install utility lines un- derground, if practical. ♦ Cluster new facilities near existing development, where possible. ♦ Design facilities such as structures, bridges, fencing, benches, and barriers to harmonize with natural landscape features, colors, and ma- terials. ♦ Cluster, reduce, and place signs to lessen their visual impact. ♦ Rehabilitate areas degraded by human use by restricting access or type(s) of use, rerouting trails and roads, removing unsightly hu- man-made features and non-native plants, restoring natural contours, and revegetating with native plants. Policy SA-2 Maintain significant landscapes or features that were for- merly maintained by natural processes. ♦ Control encroaching vegetation where it adversely affects significant scenic, historic or habitat resources (See Vegetation Management, Cultural Resources, and Integrated Pest Management policies). District development consists of facilities such as trails, restrooms, parking lots, fencing, offices, and residences. District facilities are designed to blend into the natural surroundings and are located within or adjacent to previously disturbed areas such as placing parking lots along existing roadways, or improving, remodeling, or placing new structures in previously developed areas. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES SCENIC AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES 37 ♦ Control vegetation to create or maintain important scenic viewpoints and vistas (See Vegetation Management and Integrated Pest Man- agement policies). ♦ Require District tenants to maintain landscapes and improvements to acceptable visual standards that do not detract from a visitor's experi- ence or adversely impact wildlife. Policy SA-3 Minimize unnatural noise within preserves ♦ Prevent or reduce unnatural sounds that adversely impact preserves resources or a visitors' enjoyment of them. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANGEMENT POLICY DOCUMENT SCENIC AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES 38 This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT 1 39 VIII. CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND Cultural Resources at the District The San Francisco Peninsula has had a rich and diverse history, including settlement by Native American groups; the Spanish (1776-1821) and Mexican Republican (1821-1848) colonization of the region; the annexa- tion of California by the United States in 1848; and subsequent industrial, agricultural, and residential development. There are remains from each of these periods on District lands, including Native American village sites and bedrock mortars, barns and other ranching features, orchards, wineries, historic homes, sawmills, mines, historic roads and trails, and outdoor recreational sites. As time passes, more recent periods of California’s his- tory become historically significant. As such, some 20th century sites such as World War II and Cold War military sites are now considered his- torically significant resources throughout California. Collectively, these sites, structures, features, and artifacts comprise the cultural resources of the District. The District was founded to preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land on the San Francisco Peninsula from the rapid suburban develop- ment that accelerated in the post-World War II boom in the Bay Area. Alt- hough the District’s mission is to protect the greenbelt for open space val- ues, natural resource protection, and ecologically sensitive recreation, this mission compliments cultural resource preservation goals. The devel- opment pressures from which the District protects open space land also threaten its associated historic and prehistoric structures, cultural land- scapes, and archaeological sites. The preservation of open space land in the peninsula’s greenbelt provides the opportunity for the District to pro- tect and interpret the rural history of the Santa Cruz Mountains and San Francisco Bay for the benefit of present visitors and future generations. Native American groups, such as the Ohlone, have lived on the San Francisco Peninsula for thousands of years. Bedrock mortars and other artifacts from their habitation and use of the landscape can be seen on District lands today. During the Spanish Colonial and Mexican Republican periods, the San Francisco peninsula was divided into large ranching tracts. District preserves, including Rancho San Antonio, the Rancho de Guadalupe area of Sierra Azul, and La Honda Creek (formerly Rancho San Gregorio), were part of these large land grants. In the second half of the 19th century, District forests were used for timber harvesting, residences, and outdoor recreation. Grasslands were developed for ranching and agriculture, including vineyards and orchards. Historic roads, such as Old Page Mill Road, connected communities and industries in the growing region. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 40 Cultural resources are irreplaceable resources that face substantial threats such as disturbance from construction and maintenance activities, theft, vandalism, and deterioration over time. When the District acquires land with historic structures, the structures often have suffered years of neglect and are at risk of collapse. In these cases, it can be very expen- sive to rehabilitate and maintain these structures, many of which have already lost significant resource integrity. It is sometimes necessary to remove dilapidated historic structures due to public safety concerns and the prohibitive expense of historical rehabilitation. The District has adopted “Policies Regarding Improvements on District Lands” to provide a public process used to assess and determine whether District structures and improvements are cultural resources, and how they can most appro- priately be managed. The District has successfully completed a number of important historic preservation projects, often with assistance from granting agencies and/or public/private partnerships. Cultivating relation- ships with historic preservation groups, research organizations, and knowledgeable local residents, including Native American groups, will al- low the District to pursue new opportunities to preserve cultural resources and protect remnants of the peninsula’s heritage for present and future Bay Area residents. The District serves communities of diverse ethnic her- itage, who seek a wide variety of experiences in District preserves. To the extent that these practices can be accommodated with minimal impact to the natural and cultural resources, they should be encouraged and accom- modated wherever feasible. Regulatory Context There are a number of state and federal laws pertaining to cultural re- sources to which the District must adhere in its operations. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Guideline 15064.5, Public Resources Code 21038.2) states that a substantial adverse change to the significance of a historical resource or a unique archaeological resource must be treated as a significant effect on the environment in a project’s environ- mental review. Public Resources Code 5097.9-5097.994 mandates pro- tocols for protecting Native American graves and human remains, and pro- hibits unauthorized excavation, destruction, or vandalism to Native Amer- ican archaeological sites on public land. Examples of completed historic preservation projects on District lands include the Woodhills Home at Fremont Older, Picchetti Winery, Grant Cabin at Deer Hollow Farm, and the Red Barn at La Honda Creek. CEQA defines a historical resource as potentially significant if it is at least 50 years old and is determined to be eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic Resources. A unique archaeological site is defined as a site that is at least 100 years old and has the potential to provide useful information about the past. Therefore, as time passes, t ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 41 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires con- sideration of impacts to historic resources on federal lands or projects re- quiring federal permits. Likewise, any project that requires review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 must consider impacts to cultural resources. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatri- ation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA) mandates the protection of Native American burial sites on federal lands and the repatriation of human remains and funerary objects to descendent Native American groups. Under NAGPRA, institutions with collections of Native American remains and funerary items must create an inventory and notify lineal descendents as part of the re- patriation process. In compliance with the statutes listed above, the District has included pro- tocols for unexpected discoveries of archaeological sites and human re- mains as mitigation measures in District projects. An example of a District project specifically identifying protocols for cultural resource protection is the Service Plan and accompanying Environmental Impact Report for ex- pansion of the District’s boundaries to include coastal San Mateo County completed in 2003. The Service Plan recognized the unique value of cul- tural resources in the San Mateo County coastal area and established Cul- tural Resource Policies to preserve cultural resources in the Coastal An- nexation Area. The Policies and Implementation Measures established in this Cultural RMPs are consistent with the Cultural Resource Policies in the Service Plan. The Cultural RMPs is intended to be consistent with and to supplement the District’s “Policies Regarding Improvements on District Lands.” The purpose of this policy is to formalize and enhance the District’s cultural resource management practices for the long-term stewardship of the Dis- trict’s significant historical and archaeological sites. Cultural resources are not restricted to historic structures. Many of the landscapes on District preserves are artifacts of historic and prehistoric human activity. These include agricultural landscapes, such as the orchards at Stevens Canyon Ranch; the remnants of logging in the District’s redwood forests; ranching landscapes; and the formal estates of August Schilling in Thornewood and, Harry Tevis in Bear Creek Redwoods and Fremont and Cora Older at Fremont Older. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 42 CULTURAL RESOURCE GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal CR- Identify, protect, preserve, and interpret cultural re- sources for the benefit of present and future gen- erations. Policy CR-1 Maintain an inventory of cultural resources on District pre- serves. ♦ Inventory and assess cultural resources throughout the District, in- cluding prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, structures, and cultural landscape features. The Cultural Resource Inventory should include a Geographic Information Systems database; however, access to this inventory must be restricted to District staff and qualified professionals, to the extent allowed by law to protect sites from looting and vandalism. ♦ Record cultural resources in the District’s Cultural Resource Inventory when purchasing new property and perform research on previous uses of the property. Examples of research activities include perform- ing a records search with the Northwest Information Center and consulting historic preservation organizations, previous residents, and descendents to gather local historical information. ♦ Complete archaeological site records for known unrecorded sites on District land and file reports with the Northwest Information Center. Policy CR-2 Address cultural resources in the development of preserve use and management plans. ♦ Consult the Cultural Resource Inventory when planning projects that may have an impact on cultural resources in the project area. ♦ Conduct appropriate reconnaissance measures, such as research or archaeological survey, early in the planning process for trail construc- Archaeological sites include prehistoric sites, such as Native American villages and other remnants, and historic sites dating from after European settlement. These can include Spanish Colonial /Mexican sites, and sites dating from after the annexation of California by the United States. To protect vulnerable ar- chaeological resources, the State Legislature has ex- empted sensitive archaeo- logical site information from disclosure requirements in the California Public Records Act. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 43 tion, maintenance activities, or other projects that entail ground dis- turbance in an area of known archaeological sensitivity. Monitor con- struction activities when appropriate. ♦ Locate facilities, such as trails, staging areas, and new structures, to avoid loss or degradation of historically or archaeologically significant resources wherever possible. If not possible to avoid, minimize im- pacts, for example by: capping site, recording important features and/or artifacts, relocating structures, or data recovery excavation. ♦ Include stakeholder groups when developing plans for the manage- ment of historically or archaeologically significant resources. Con- sult with descendent communities such as Native American and other ethnic groups when developing plans for the management of histori- cally or archaeologically significant resources related to their heritage. ♦ Assess the significance, integrity, and feasibility of preservation of his- toric structures when developing Preserve Use and Management Plans or Master Plans. If a structure is determined to be eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources, assess feasibility of pre- serving the resource. Policy CR-3 Protect cultural resources from disturbance to the maximum extent feasible. ♦ Wherever possible and appropriate, preserve historical resources and archaeological sites in situ. ♦ Prohibit looting, vandalism, and unauthorized removal of cultural re- sources and associated artifacts from District preserves. ♦ Implement security measures such as protective fencing and patrol- ling to reduce vulnerability of the resources due to vandalism and loot- ing. ♦ Develop security protocols to limit availability and distribution of geo- graphic information for cultural resources to protect sites from looting and vandalism. ♦ Prohibit District sale, purchase, or commercial trade of individual ar- chaeological artifacts. Looting of archaeological sites for commercial gain poses a threat to sites around the world. Codes of archaeological ethics there- fore discourage any activity that commodifies artifacts and encourages their com- mercial trade. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 44 ♦ Develop and follow guidelines for reporting, protecting and recording archaeological sites and features in the event of unexpected discov- ery. ♦ Provide District staff with basic training to identify and protect cultural resources. ♦ Assess existing operations within areas of known archaeological sen- sitivity to protect and preserve cultural resources. ♦ Require that all archaeological investigations or research activities that have the potential to physically significantly impact archaeological resources are carried out by qualified archaeologists, and that a tech- nical report for each project is provided to the District following exca- vation. Policy CR-4 Preserve and maintain cultural resources wherever feasible. ♦ Actively pursue grant assistance from local, state, federal, and other programs to supplement District funds to implement historic preserva- tion projects for historically and archaeologically significant resources. ♦ Seek partnerships with private or non-profit groups to aid in the resto- ration, management, and use of historic structures. ♦ Assess the condition, identify needed repairs, and prepare mainte- nance plans for significant high priority historic structures as funds al- low. ♦ Assess the eligibility of cultural resources for nomination on local reg- isters, the California Register of Historic Resources, and the National Register of Historic Places. Consider nomination to registers for which a resource is determined eligible. ♦ Catalog artifacts associated with sites on District lands to prevent de- terioration and to document the site and location where the artifacts were recovered. Consider curating artifacts in danger of deterioration. Maintain a cataloging system to preserve artifacts’ contextual infor- mation and storage locations. Where appropriate, coordinate with other agencies and organizations to assist in long-term curation of Dis- trict collections. ♦ Develop and follow guidelines and procedures governing loans of ar- tifacts to other agencies and organizations. There are a number of po- tential sources of grant fund- ing for historic preservation projects. In the past, the District has received grants from the Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commis- sion and the California Herit- age Fund. Listing resources on local, state, or national registers can increase oppor- tunities for grant funding. Provenience, or the contex- tual information associated with an artifact or collection, is important for retaining its research potential and rele- vance for interested commu- nities. A cataloging system is a crucial tool for preserv- ing this information and keeping it linked to objects. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 45 Policy CR-5 Provide public access and educational programs to interpret historical and archaeological resources. (See PI-1) ♦ Provide controlled public access to historical and archaeological sites where appropriate, considering other public access resource con- straints and resource protection. ♦ Allow appropriate uses of cultural resources by descendent communi- ties. ♦ Seek input from descendent communities, such as Native American and other ethnic groups, when planning public access and educational programs that interpret cultural resources related to their heritage. ♦ When developing partnerships for the use and management of historic structures, plan for public access to the structures where appropriate while minimizing impact to the structures and respecting the needs of building occupants. ♦ Provide interpretive materials such as signage or brochures for self- guided hikes to inform visitors about the history of District lands and the San Francisco Bay Area. Develop locations to display artifacts for public benefit. ♦ Encourage, utilize, and support historical research by docents and vol- unteers. ♦ Provide training opportunities for docents to aid them in the develop- ment of docent-led tours of historic and archaeological sites and land- scapes. ♦ Facilitate school field trips of historic and archaeological sites and cultivate other opportunities to work with educational groups to inter- pret cultural resources on District preserves. ♦ Support historical and archaeological research conducted by District- approved, qualified cultural resource professionals on District lands. Public interpretation and ac- cess to non-sensitive infor- mation about cultural re- sources on District land is an important part of their preser- vation, conveying their im- portance to the general pub- lic. The District’s cultural re- sources are a valuable public asset. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 46 Policy CR-6 Preserve District institutional history. ♦ Preserve documents and artifacts important to the history of the Dis- trict. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 47 This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT 1 48 IX. RESEARCH AND COLLECTION OF INFORMATION BACKGROUND Achieving the District's resource management objectives requires sup- port in the form of basic academic research and applied field studies. This level of research is usually conducted by colleges and universities, by con- sultants as part of environmental analysis for project proposals, or by en- vironmental and wildlife organizations such as the California Native Plant Society, the Nature Conservancy, or the Audubon Society. Although the District may conduct or sponsor research directly, it will continue to depend on and support outside research to expand its knowledge about the natu- ral resources under its care, and to provide the basis for sound planning and management decisions. RESEARCH AND INFORMATION GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal RC- Use and document scientific knowledge of pre- serve resources and resource management tech- niques as a basis for management decisions Policy RC-1 Maintain resource information files for each preserve and re- source subject. ♦ Systematically gather information and data from appropriate agencies, universities, non-profit organizations, studies, and reports. Integrate spatial data into the District’s GIS database. ♦ Maintain an electronic filing system to facilitate access of spatial data and information by location and resource type. ♦ Facilitate the reporting of resource related observational data by field staff and the public and its access by District staff. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES RESEARCH AND COLLECTION INFORMATION 49 ♦ Respond to public information requests and promote release of non sensitive resource information to better distribute and share District scientific knowledge. ♦ Recruit interns and volunteers to help organize and maintain resource information files, in cooperation with the District's volunteer program. Policy RC-2 Coordinate and cooperate with institutions, agencies, organ- izations, and individuals conducting resource management or research. ♦ Maintain a list of District related potential resource research projects. Encourage research directed to specific sites, District-related issues, or resource management practices. ♦ Administer the District’s Resource Management Grant Program to fund projects that contribute to resource management projects. Incor- porate the District’s list of potential projects into the Grant Program. ♦ Explore partnerships and foster relationships with educational institu- tions, scientists, and other land management professionals in order to share information and resources and to develop Memorandums of Un- derstanding or Memorandums of Agreement between the District and other agencies. ♦ Sponsor or participate in events and activities such as symposiums, workshops, and conferences that support scientific research and sound resource management practices. ♦ Encourage and facilitate currency on resource management tech- niques, such as restoration, integrated pest management, and ero- sion control. ♦ Provide internship support for appropriate research. Policy RC-3 Undertake original research necessary for planning or man- agement decisions. ♦ Carefully research existing information and explore opportunities for cooperative studies to collect additional information. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES RESEARCH AND COLLECTION INFORMATION 50 ♦ Retain qualified consultants or researchers to conduct studies or col- lect additional information in a standardized format that can be inte- grated with the District’s GIS database. ♦ Encourage and facilitate training of District staff to obtain environmen- tal permits (such as scientific collection or sensitive species handling permits) in order to participate in or conduct needed research and monitoring and to maintain relationships with agency staff. ♦ Share significant new information through resource agency contacts and local and regional databases, such as the California Natural Di- versity Data Base and Natural Resources Database. Policy RC-4 Allow collecting, trapping, or other field research activities only in conjunction with legitimate research consistent with the District's management goals. ♦ Continue to administer the District’s Special Use Permit Program for collection, trapping, archaeological research, or field studies on Dis- trict lands. ♦ Require the researcher to share the information resulting from the studies with the District and other appropriate parties. If appropriate, integrate data into electronic filing system or GIS database. Policy RC-5 Develop performance measures when designing District pro- jects and collect monitoring data to evaluate project suc- cess. ♦ Research and utilize existing performance measures from comparable prior projects and partner agencies. ♦ Collect and evaluate monitoring data to measure project success and for use in adaptive management. ♦ Engage in benchmarking opportunities with public, partners, and re- search institutions through collaborations and the sharing of project data. ATTACHMENT 1 51 X. PUBLIC INTERPRETATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION BACKGROUND Communication and outreach are key to developing broad public support for acquiring and protecting open space. Increasing public knowledge and appreciation of the preserves' natural and cultural resources will improve support for their conservation. The District needs to inform the public about District treasures, so it will care about protecting them. The resource management program will play a vital role in this effort by providing a greatly improved information base for the public. Studying the current condition of preserve resources and discovering how best to main- tain and restore them will reveal information that stimulates public interest, makes the preserves more enjoyable places to visit, and inspires respect and a sense of stewardship. The District's Public Affairs department is charged with communicating this information to the public. For example, staff works closely with local schools, districts, agencies, and other special groups to provide environ- mental education and interpretive programming to students, organiza- tions, and the general public. The Public Affairs department also gets the word out through publications, presentations, and working with the media. The volunteer and docent programs greatly increase public outreach op- portunities. The volunteer program provides a means for the public to learn firsthand about stewardship, by participating in District projects. The docent program trains docents to conduct activities on the preserves and interpret District resources. Docents also staff the Daniels Nature Center and lead environmental science-based field trips for students. Environmental education is typically a curriculum-based approach tar- geted toward students to attain an ultimate goal (such as environmental stewardship). The District’s environmental science-based programming was established in 1996 and serves elementary school students in a field trip experience at the District’s Daniel’s Nature Center and surrounding Skyline Ridge Preserve. During the program students engage in hands on discovery and learning. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES PUBLIC INTERPRETATION AND ENVIRONMENETAL EDU- CATION 52 Interpretation is a communication method that reveals meanings, con- nections, and relationships by firsthand experience, and by illustrative me- dia, such as web pages or signs. The District's interpretive program in- cludes communication and outreach by District staff and docents, as well as through brochures, publications, signage, signboards, exhibits, and other means. Interpretive programs are often the most effective means of stimulating understanding and appreciation of open space, providing in- formation, promoting stewardship of resources, and helping ensure visitor safety. INTERPRETATION AND EDUCATION GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal PI- Increase public knowledge, understanding, and appreciation of the natural and cultural resources of the preserves, and support for their conserva- tion. Policy PI-1 Provide interpretive programming, facilities, and materials. (See CR-5, GM-6 and GM-7) ♦ Develop appropriate and timely projects and plans to support natural and cultural resource interpretive opportunities that are guided by rec- ommendations and priorities in the District’s Interpretive Systems Plan (ISP), ♦ Provide interpretive materials via a wide range of media (web and print based). ♦ Continue to operate an interpretive program at the David Daniels Na- ture Center at Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve with docents and staff to support its use by the general public and local schools and organizations. An Interpretive Service Plan (ISP) serves to identify and prioritize the valuable natural and cultural resource “sto- ries” and connections that can be brought forward through enhanced or new in- terpretive programs or facili- ties at each location being evaluated. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES PUBLIC INTERPRETATION AND ENVIRONMENETAL EDU- CATION 53 ♦ Provide information about the District's mission, resources, manage- ment practices, and goals in District signboards, facilities, and publi- cations. Encourage publication of this information in the general me- dia. ♦ Provide training for new docents and additional "refresher courses" to continue to help them provide interpretive services. ♦ Provide opportunities for the public to learn about natural resources and support resource management activities through the docent and volunteer programs. Policy PI-2 Provide environmental education programming and out- reach. ♦ Coordinate and cooperate with local agencies and organizations, par- ticularly schools that would like to use District lands and facilities for environmental education, whenever appropriate. ♦ Involve school children in District-sponsored environmental projects and educational activities. ♦ Provide environmental education programs and materials to schools, groups, and organizations. Policy PI-3 Provide other public outreach. ♦ Support and/or participate in special events and programs that foster public knowledge and appreciation of open space resources. ♦ Participate in multi-agency forums to share information and resources and explore partnership opportunities. ♦ Develop and use outreach opportunities to gain public support for re- source management goals and policies. ♦ Work with the Public Affairs Department to increase public awareness of resource values. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES PUBLIC INTERPRETATION AND ENVIRONMENETAL EDU- CATION 54 This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT 1 55 XI. GRAZING MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND The vegetation of the Santa Cruz Mountains is comprised of a rich and diverse assemblage of plant species. This wealth of diversity was most evident within the grassland ecosystems that evolved under a variety of disturbance pressures including fire and grazing by large herds of ungu- late animals, which are now mostly extinct. The flora that emerged has been described as one of the most diverse and species rich ecosystems in the United States. The arrival of early Spanish and Anglo settlers initiated a particularly dra- matic change in species composition of California grasslands, primarily as a result of tilling the grasslands for agricultural crop production, reduction of native grazing animals and introduction of cattle herds brought over from Europe and let loose on the new rangeland. This introduction of non- native plants and animals, coupled with the concurrent suppression of fire on the landscape as the western United States was settled, resulted in the substantial replacement of the native grassland vegetation with a predom- inately exotic, annual flora. The exotic vegetation is often more competi- tive, productive, and prolific than the native plants within which it coexists, and tends to dominate and replace existing native grasses and wildflow- ers. Over the last 150 years, coastal grassland areas have also experi- enced large-scale conversion to agriculture or urban development. The remaining undeveloped grasslands face continued development pressure and are severely impacted by exotic, invasive organisms. The District’s open space preserves contain large acreages of grasslands that in many areas have been degraded due to the pressures described above. Management of these grassland habitats is desirable to reduce the risk of wildfire and to maintain viable native plant communities. Vege- tation management using livestock grazing or other resource manage- ment tools can be a substitute for native grazing animals and recurring fire to achieve the District’s objective of preserving, protecting and restoring the natural environment. The greatest diversity within California’s coastal grasslands can be seen in the forbs or wildflowers that emerge in the spring following winter rains. Sites with adequate management of non-native vegetation will reward these efforts with bountiful displays of colorful spring wildflowers. By some estimates, nearly 80 percent of the vegetation cover within California grasslands is exotic vegetation. District lands currently contain approximately 5300 acres of grassland habitat. The largest contiguous grassland areas are within District lands in western San Mateo County. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GRAZING MANAGEMENT 56 In 2003, the District completed the Service Plan and accompanying Envi- ronmental Impact Report for the San Mateo Coastal Annexation Area ex- pansion of the District’s boundaries to include coastal San Mateo County. The Service Plan recognized the unique value of the San Mateo County coastal area and established Agricultural Policies to preserve and encour- age viable agricultural use of land. The Policies and Implementation Measures established in this Grazing Management Policy are intended to supplement and complement the Agricultural Policies in the Service Plan. Furthermore, these Grazing Management Policies will be implemented in a manner that is consistent with the Service Plan. GRAZING MANAGEMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal GM- Manage District land with livestock grazing that is protective of natural resources and that is compat- ible with public access; to maintain and enhance the diversity of native plant and animal communi- ties, manage vegetation fuel for fire protection, help sustain the local agricultural economy, and preserve and foster appreciation for the region’s rural agricultural heritage. Policy GM-1 Ensure that grazing is compatible with and supports wildlife and wildlife habitats. ♦ Inventory and assess sensitive habitats to identify areas requiring spe- cial management practices. The conservation of these areas will take precedence over other uses and management practices that are de- termined to have an adverse effect on these resources. ♦ Prepare site-specific grazing management plans by a certified range- land manager including best management practices (BMPs) for pre- serves where grazing will be utilized as a resource management tool. The site-specific grazing management plan will be a component of the Livestock ranching is a small but vital part of the Bay Area’s agricultural economy. As with any business that depends on local infrastructure and services, livestock ranching is increasingly threatened with each ranch that goes out of business. Every livestock rancher depends on services and supplies including veterinary care, feed sales and delivery, farm and ranch infrastructure supplies, and livestock transportation services. As land is taken out of ranching, all of these services and supplies are incrementally affected and may cease to operate, increasing the burden for families and businesses that choose to keep ranching. Typical fencing used to control livestock movement is five-strand barbwire fencing. Other fencing types that may be used include four-strand barbwire for interior fencing, wood rail fencing and temporary electric fencing that can be installed to seasonally restrict livestock to target areas or exclude livestock from sensitive areas. Wildlife-friendly fences enable virtually all wild animals to move through an area without harm and with minimal impediment. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GRAZING MANAGEMENT 57 agricultural production plan developed through the Use and Manage- ment Planning process. The Use and Management Planning process provides for public input and Board approval of site-specific grazing management plans. ♦ Manage agricultural leases and easements to protect and enhance riparian areas and to maximize the protection or enhancement of water quality. (See WR-4) Policy GM-2 Provide necessary infrastructure to support and improve grazing management where appropriate. ♦ Utilize fencing that allows wildlife movement and fosters habitat con- nectivity. (See WM-3:Measure 3) ♦ Manage access to existing water features and where needed supply supplemental drinking water through stock ponds and water troughs to preserve clean water for livestock, protect water quality, and en- hance habitat for wildlife. ♦ Encourage and assist grazing tenants on District land to provide range improvements to restore or conserve wildland resources and to en- hance range condition. ♦ Inventory and assess roads and trails on District lands to identify sig- nificant erosion and sediment sources – abandon and where feasible restore to a natural condition poorly designed or sited roads. (See WR-4) Policy GM-3 Monitor environmental response to grazing on District lands. ♦ Monitor forage utilization and distribution by grazing animals to assure appropriate amounts of residual dry matter (RDM) remain on the ground to achieve desired resource management objectives. In the course of RDM monitoring, evaluate and report on wildland fire fuel levels that may result in an increased risk of wildland fire (See WF policies). ♦ Monitor livestock use levels and agricultural infrastructure condition to insure conformity with lease provisions to contribute to improved management. Residual Dry Matter (RDM) is a measure of the amount of vegetation left on the ground, typically measured at the end of the summer or fall. Appropriate levels of RDM strive to minimize thatch, which can inhibit new plant growth, while maintaining adequate levels of vegetation to prohibit soil erosion. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GRAZING MANAGEMENT 58 ♦ Monitor wildland conditions with an emphasis on documenting the lo- cation, distribution and abundance of native grasses, wildflowers, and other native flora and fauna. ♦ Monitor water quality in ponds, wetlands, and watercourses with un- restricted livestock access. ♦ Monitor non-native vegetation response to grazing with an emphasis on documenting the location, distribution and abundance of target, invasive species. ♦ Use information collected from monitoring to annually review range- land conditions and response to livestock grazing. Use adaptive re- source management decision making framework within grazing management plans. Policy GM-4 Utilize different livestock species to accomplish vegetation management objectives. ♦ Research the effective use of cattle, goats, sheep, and horses to man- age vegetation on District lands. ♦ Utilize appropriate species depending on management needs. Policy GM-5 Preserve and foster existing and potential grazing opera- tions to help sustain the local agricultural economy. ♦ Establish longer term grazing leases to promote financial viability for the operators and efficient land stewardship for the District. ♦ Seek grants or other economic support for agricultural infrastructure maintenance and improvements. ♦ Ensure site-specific grazing management plans are economically fea- sible and practical for grazing operators. Policy GM-6 Provide information to the public about the region’s rural ag- ricultural heritage. (See PI-1) ♦ Install display boards and give presentations highlighting historical and educational facts about ranching families and industry at appro- priate sites. Fire reduction is a great concern for some landowners. However, cattle are not able to graze all land areas effectively for fire protection purposes, such as steep slopes or slopes partially vegetated with brush. In these instances, goats may be an effective alternative. Goat herds can be rented for a short period of time and can be moved with a goat herder and dog(s) along with portable fence enclosures. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GRAZING MANAGEMENT 59 Policy GM-7 Provide public access in a manner that minimizes impacts on the grazing operation. (See PI-1) ♦ Grazing operators on District lands or lands under easement to the District shall be consulted when public access is being planned and considered for the property to minimize conflicts between the public and the grazing operation. ♦ Prepare and distribute a brochure to educate visitors about etiquette for use of open space property with livestock animals. ♦ Install signage where appropriate to educate the public about the re- source benefits of grazing and to educate visitors about approaching animals, closing gates, and other etiquette appropriate for moving through lands with livestock animals. Policy GM-8 Grazing operations on District lands in the Coastside Pro- tection Area will be managed in accordance with the policies established in the Service Plan for the San Mateo Coastal Annexation Area. ♦ Consult with appropriate agencies and interest groups, including the San Mateo County Farm Bureau and San Mateo County Agricultural Advisory Committee in the development of site-specific Use and Man- agement plans and agricultural production plan components in the Coastside Protection Area. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 60 XII. FOREST MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND As of 2007, District lands encompass approximately 30,000 acres of for- est and woodland habitat. Approximately 11,500 acres consist of red- wood and Douglas-fir associated coniferous forest, located primarily in the northern Skyline area of the District. These forests are often inter- mixed with a lesser component of hardwood, primarily tanoak, madrone, California bay, black oak, and various live oaks. The remaining 18,500 acres consist of a variety of hardwood forest and woodlands. These consist of numerous oak species (coast live, canyon live, and Shreve oak, black oak, blue oak, valley oak), madrone, tanoak, California bay, California buckeye, and riparian species such as red and white alder, big-leaf maple, various willow species, California sycamore, and box elder. Forest and woodlands within the District have been subject to significant historic modifications. Portions of the oak forests and woodlands have had a history of livestock grazing and fuel wood procurement. The ef- fects of these uses are not well documented, but young dense stands (primarily live oak species) occur within the preserves in areas of prior dis- turbance. These young dense stands often occur along forest margins or have regenerated within areas that had been previously cleared. At the other end of the spectrum are beautiful stands of large old majestic oaks. Concerns about the reduction of oak forest and woodland within California often center on their conversion to urbanized uses or commercial agricul- ture. The primary role for the District is the preservation and protection of these forests and woodlands, particularly considering the heavy urban growth pressures within the San Francisco Bay Area. Riparian hardwood forests have also been modified in areas by past land use practices. These practices have typically whittled away at the width of the corridors, in places narrowing the corridors to thin strips along the edges of creeks. When riparian forests are modified in this manner, it is common for the species composition to change to those species that pre- fer to be near the water (typically willow and alder), while reducing species that typically occupy elevated floodplains such as sycamore. The term forest applies to habitats dominated by tree species with a continuous or nearly continuous canopy covering substantial portions of the landscape. Woodlands consist of scattered trees across the landscape intermixed with a significant habitat component of other vegetation types such as grassland. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 61 The proximity of the redwood and Douglas-fir forests in the Santa Cruz Mountains to the urban San Francisco Bay Area and associated ports of trade fostered the development of an early and intense commercial log- ging industry. Commercial timber harvest and milling activities were well underway beginning in the 1850’s within the La Honda Creek, Purisima Creek Redwoods, and El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve areas. Timber harvest activities have generally altered the forest stands by reducing the size and age of the stands and increasing the density of the young growth. This is clearly evident when viewing the distribution of old growth redwood stumps within the forests. A second round of logging that focused on residual (left over) old growth and the second growth that re-sprouted from the late 1800’s clear cuts began in the 1950’s-1960’s. Tractor logging continued within El Corte de Madera Creek and Purisima Creek watersheds throughout the 1970’s and 1980’s, resulting in third and fourth timber harvest entries into much of the areas that are now pro- tected by the open space preserves. Numerous roads were constructed to facilitate access to early timber (and grazing) operations on the properties now owned by the District. These roads were often constructed in locations, and utilizing methods that were insufficiently protective of water quality and aquatic resources. The elim- ination or conversion of non-essential roads and the judicious mainte- nance of essential roads will be necessary to protect water quality and aquatic resources. Pathogens are a significant threat to the District forests. The most notable pathogen at present is Phytophthora ramorum which is responsible for Sudden Oak Death syndrome, commonly known as SOD. A number of oak species are susceptible to death and slow decline from SOD, particu- larly tanoak, and additional host species include many other forest trees and shrubs. SOD has the potential to seriously impact forests within the preserves and the region, presenting a number of social and ecological concerns. All of the forest ecosystems within the District preserves evolved in asso- ciation with periodic fire. Fire suppression activities within the Santa Cruz Mountains, as well as throughout the Western United States, have ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 62 also had an effect on District forests. The effects of fire suppression typi- cally include an increase in forest density, a build up of forest floor fuel loads, and a decrease in herbaceous forest floor plant communities. For- est management actions can be undertaken to reduce the severity of fires within the forest ecosystem and watersheds when these fires occur. Pre- scriptive forest management can achieve conditions suitable for the rein- troduction of fire into forest ecosystems, an ecological function that has been largely absent, except under typically severe conditions, for the past sixty years. The District has preserved large blocks of forest and woodland. The over- all extent of District land holdings within the greater Santa Cruz Mountain Bioregion is exceptionally important to regional biodiversity and well suited to regional ecosystem management. State, county and local parks, non profit and conservation organization owned properties and numerous conservation easements over both public and private properties, together with the District preserves, provide tremendous opportunities for regional forest preservation and restoration. Active conifer forest management on public lands is typically limited to relatively small fuel management projects and controlled burns in old growth stands within some state parks. This limits the majority of these forests to more hands off management, requiring long periods of time where trees compete for food, water, and sunlight. During this time period, which can take hundreds of years, the dominant trees will persist, while the less dominant trees will be crowded out and die. During much of this transitional period, habitat complexity and biodiversity can remain rela- tively stagnant and simplified. Maintaining most of these protected forests under the same management paradigm has the potential to suppress re- gional biodiversity. From a regional perspective, old growth and late-seral conifer forests are very limited in distribution. Late-seral forests, or late-successional for- ests, are older forests that begin to develop some characteristics similar to old growth forests. The initial development of late-seral redwood and Douglas-fir forests is generally considered to take place between 80 to 300 years, and continue to persist for centuries, with the oldest redwoods reaching an age of 1,000 to 2,000 years old. The District preserves have retained a significant “biological legacy” of residual (uncut) single old Late-seral and old growth forest characteristics typically include: large widely spaced trees, thick bark, large complex branches, large standing snags in various stages of decay, large downed logs on the forest floor, and a closed canopy. This complex structure results in a very wide variety of habitat conditions and results in tremendous biodiversity. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 63 growth trees and small stands of old growth, as well as a substantial older Douglas fir component. These biological legacies are known to harbor significant remaining habitat components that are used by wildlife, from the canopy species such as marbled murrelets down to soil microbes. The District’s conifer dominated Preserves offer the opportunity to manage forest conditions to accelerate late-seral habitat conditions to promote biologically diverse, dynamic forest habitat, increase the extent of this lim- ited habitat, and accelerate the development of forest structure for the ben- efit of protected species and for improved fire resistance. FOREST MANAGEMENT GOALS, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal FM- Manage District land to retain and promote biolog- ically diverse, dynamic forest conditions; maintain and enhance high quality forest and aquatic habi- tat; encourage and enhance the development of late-seral conifer forest; provide for visitor experi- ences within diverse forest habitat; and promote District and regional fire management objectives. Policy FM-1 Inventory and assess District forest and woodland. ♦ Inventory and assess existing District forest conditions. Inventories within hardwood stands should include forest age, structure, health, and an evaluation of regeneration (growth of seedlings and young trees). Inventories within conifer stands should have a particular em- phasis on forest age and structural characteristics, identification of bi- ological legacies, and the reconnection and restoration of late-seral habitat. Inventories should also include the identification and assess- ment of any effects of urbanization on the forests. ♦ Identify unique habitat features such as meadows, ponds, or other non-forested communities. Evaluate the need for management to ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 64 maintain landscape heterogeneity and specialized habitat for non-for- est wildlife and vegetation. ♦ Inventory District forest wildlife with a particular emphasis on special status species, such as the marbled murrelet, spotted owl, Vaux’s swift, numerous raptor species, and indicator species such as the pi- leated woodpecker. ♦ Inventory District forest to assess fuel loads and forest structure re- lated to fire. Identify access issues and District and community/re- gional fire concerns. Policy FM-2 Ensure that forest management activities are compatible with the protection of special status plant and animal spe- cies. ♦ Conduct time appropriate surveys for special status species to estab- lish the presence or absence thereof, and identify essential habitat features (nest trees, roosts, sheltering trees, springs, and ponds). ♦ Manage forests to expand critical habitat for sensitive species by re- storing forest structure and habitat elements utilized by sensitive spe- cies to develop and connect suitable habitat. ♦ Continue regular consultation with regulatory agencies and experts to develop plans to protect and enhance habitat for sensitive species. Policy FM-3 Ensure that forest management activities are compatible with riparian ecosystem and water resources protection and policies. ♦ Protect riparian ecosystems and habitat to maintain natural hydro- logic process, water quality, and wildlife benefits. Maintain essential riparian functions, and if necessary enhance and restore riparian hab- itats. ♦ Inventory and assess roads and trails on District forestlands to identify significant erosion and sediment sources. Maintain essential roads to high standards, and eliminate or reduce to trail width all non-essential roads. (See Policies WR-3 and WR-4). Riparian ecosystems are streamside ecosystems that are extremely important to numerous forest plant and wildlife species. In addition to benefits to wildlife such as fish and amphibians, these ecosystems also play critical roles regarding forest hydrology and water quality. The protection and restoration of Riparian ecosystems is a primary component of Forest Management. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 65 ♦ Discourage forest management activities within riparian areas unless justified and implemented for the specific purpose of restoring de- graded riparian habitat. Policy FM-4 Manage District conifer forests to sustain and encourage the development of late-seral habitat conditions. ♦ Prepare Forest Management Plans for high priority District forests to establish habitat goals and appropriate management treatments. Utilize restoration ecologists, forest ecologists, Registered Profes- sional Foresters, or other resource management professionals to prepare plans, as appropriate. ♦ Restore degraded forest habitats to promote the development of late- seral habitat, forest habitat complexity, and to enhance biodiversity, where existing stand conditions and access permit. Utilize state of the art silvicultural (forestry) practices to restore degraded forests. ♦ Protect existing residual old growth trees and stands, mature oaks, and most large, older Douglas fir trees. The conservation of these areas will take precedence over other uses and management prac- tices that are determined to have an adverse effect on these re- sources. ♦ Maintain and/or create large snags and downed wood for wildlife hab- itat where not a safety hazard. ♦ Foster relationships with educational institutions, forest scientists and forest professionals to inform District forest management decisions based upon sound, current science, and to contribute opportunities for continuing research of late-seral focused management. Seek grant opportunities and partnerships for forest research and monitoring. Policy FM-5 Provide necessary fire and fuel management practices to protect forest resources and public health and safety. (See WF policies) ♦ Maintain essential roads for emergency fire access, and forest man- agement activities undertaken to reduce fire hazard. ♦ Maintain adequate fire clearance around District structures and facili- ties. (See WF-3 and WF-1: Measure 5) Restoration forestry practices may result in timber that would be available for commercial sale. Revenue derived from commercial timber sales conducted in conjunction with restoration activities will be used for resource management activities (such as road upgrade projects, weed abatement projects, and long-term monitoring). Snags are dead standing trees that are important to a variety of species. As trees age and die, holes created by woodpeckers cavity decay, and broken branches create new habitat niches for a host of bird, bat, small mammal, amphibian, and insect species. Snags and large downed wood are critical components of high quality late-seral forest communities. Late-seral redwood and Douglas-fir forests are generally considered to be some of the most fire resistant and resilient type of forest. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 66 ♦ Encourage neighboring property owners to maintain adequate fire clearance around existing development. Consult with regulatory agencies to encourage that construction of new development main- tains fire agency recommended setbacks for fire clearance between new development and District forest and woodland. ♦ Evaluate the potential to reduce forest fuel loading through the re- moval of smaller trees to reduce forest floor fuel buildup and ladder fuels. ♦ Coordinate with fire agencies and local communities to define loca- tions where fire protection infrastructure is desirable and practical. ♦ Reintroduce fire as a resource management tool to reduce forest floor fuels and reestablish fire for ecosystem health where stand conditions, access, and public safety permit. Coordinate with other agencies for planning and implementation. ♦ Seek grant opportunities and partnerships for fuel management pro- jects and monitoring. Policy FM-6 Protect forest health from intense wildfire, pests, and path- ogens with high potential to cause damage. ♦ Evaluate potential for forest loss to intense wildfire, pests and patho- gens where effective methods are available and justified. ♦ Limit the scale of clearings and light-gaps in forests to reduce potential for weed establishment. Where activities occur within the forest edges, weed treatments and monitoring will be a component of the treatment plan. ♦ Manage forest diseases when necessary to protect natural biological diversity and critical ecosystem functions. Regarding Sudden Oak Death (SOD): detect, report and monitor infested areas; utilize sanita- tion and best management practices (BMPs) to control the spread of the SOD pathogen; train staff and educate the public; and support SOD research to guide land management decisions (See VM-1 and WF policies). Policy FM-7 Monitor wildlife, water quality, and vegetation response to forest management activities. Fire hazard reduction is a great concern for some landowners, particularly residential landowners. Fire can also be a significant threat to the environment, particularly water and aquatic resources. Shaded fuel breaks are an example of a fuel reduction project that the District can undertake. They consist of areas where vegetation is thinned to break up horizontal connectivity, and lower growing “ladder fuels” that can connect ground fire to tree canopy are removed. Enough tall tree canopy is retained to maintain shade to discourage the re-growth of ladder fuels. These often require follow-up maintenance. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 67 ♦ Conduct pre and post project wildlife and vegetation surveys with em- phasis on special status species. ♦ Monitor water quality upstream and downstream of forest manage- ment activities that have the potential to negatively affect water quality or aquatic resources. ♦ Periodically re-inventory forest conditions with a frequency adequate to monitor forest response to management. Policy FM-8 Provide educational opportunities for the general public and recreational users regarding forest ecosystems and man- agement. ♦ Place interpretive displays in accessible locations to inform and edu- cate the public about forest ecosystems, and management techniques employed on District lands. ♦ Conduct public outreach to inform and gain support for District activi- ties within the local community. ♦ Conduct interviews with individuals related to past land use and his- tory of forested Preserves to compile historical details and perspec- tives on District forest land. Include history into interpretation and educational opportunities within the Preserves. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOREST MANAGEMENT 68 This page intentionally blank ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 69 XIII. ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION BACKGROUND Ecological succession is the sequential development of plant and animal communities following disturbance. In a land management context, this natural process can be both positive and negative. For example, the nat- ural recruitment of coyote brush in grassland areas on District lands is re- ducing the extent of this already-limited habitat type and has serious im- pacts on native plants and wildlife. Regrowth of mixed evergreen forest in previously-logged areas is threatening to shade out rare species. Ponds and seasonal wetlands, which are slowly filling in with sediment and con- verting to grassland and areas dominated by broadleaf tree species can become shaded out by coniferous forests. This policy addresses such undesirable habitat type conversions that result from the process of eco- logical succession. The directional nature of succession was once thought to result in a stable, stationary species composition (known as the “climax community”) over time. In reality, however, all natural systems are subject to disturbance and limited by seed availability and the process of succession may never reach completion. Early-succession species have specific life history strategies which allow them to take advantage of disturbance. Further- more, some species, such as knobcone pine, King’s Mountain manzanita, and many grassland plants, are disturbance-dependent: they require disturbance to maintain habitat conditions suitable for reproduction and establishment. Both natural and human disturbance drive species com- position in natural habitats. Past disturbance regimes (either natural or historic and pre-historic land management) can be artificially re-created to maintain desired habitat types. More intensive management may also be necessary as climate change causes large-scale shifts in plant commu- nity composition and distribution. Ecological disturbance is the disruption of an ecosystem's structure and function, generally with effects that last for time periods longer than a single growing season for vegetation. Physical disturbances in our region include fire, windstorm, drought, flood, and earthquake. Biogenic disturbances include the impacts of herbivorous insects, mammals, disease, and pathogens. Anthropogenic disturbances include logging, development, agricultural land use conversion, and non-native invasive species introductions. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION 70 ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION GOAL, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal ES- Use sustainable land management techniques to maintain, restore, or simulate natural disturbance in priority habitats. Policy ES-1 Manage historic grassland areas that are threatened by shrub encroachment. (See VM-1) ♦ Identify priority grasslands for management, focusing on those with cultural significance and/or a substantial component of native species. ♦ Identify the most cost-effective, safe, and least environmentally dam- aging management technique for shrub removal, including livestock grazing, mechanical removal, and prescribed fire. ♦ Prepare long-term plans for managed grassland areas to ensure that desired conditions are maintained. ♦ Monitor and manage grasslands for invasive species and biodiversity to promote use of grasslands by native and special status species Policy ES-2 Preserve and enhance pond habitats and other wetlands. ♦ Inventory and assess ponds to identify opportunities for habitat maintenance and/or aesthetic enhancement. ♦ Monitor sensitive reptile and amphibian populations on District lands. ♦ Preserve pond habitats through maintenance of infrastructure such as: pond contours, depth, earthen berms, spillways and inlet and outlet features ♦ Remove sediment or invasive vegetation to provide improved habitat for sensitive species. Policy ES-3 Facilitate regeneration of disturbance-dependent special status, rare, or unique plants. As Alpine Pond, Horseshoe Lake, and other District ponds fill with sediment, open water habitat is rapidly transitioning to cattail marsh with little open water. Certain rare amphibians as well as many common wildlife species require open water for key portions of their life cycles. Unique stands of knobcone pine, a fire-adapted species, in southern Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve will hold seeds in pine cones for up to 30 years waiting for a fire to release them. With the absence of fire, knobcone stands are not being replaced as older mature trees die off and their seeds are not released resulting in an overall decline of the species. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION 71 ♦ Research, document, and implement site specific fire prescriptions to improve regeneration of fire adapted and special status vegetation in fire-dependent ecosystems where feasible. ♦ Develop and implement an alternative management protocol to en- courage seedling establishment of special status and disturbance adapted species in aging stands when regeneration by fire is not fea- sible. Nearly all stands of the rare Kings Mountain manzanita on District lands are in danger of being shaded out by Douglas fir and other trees. No regeneration has been observed in these stands. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 72 XIV. HABITAT CONNECTIVITY BACKGROUND Habitats are the conditions and locations in which plants and animals live and reproduce, and are a critical component of a naturally functioning eco- system. Habitats come in many forms, but are traditionally thought of as the particular communities of plants and animals that together comprise the ideal conditions for one focal species or for a broad assembly of par- ticular plants and animals. District open space lands are made up of a wide variety of habitats, including freshwater streams, redwood forests, oak woodlands, coastal grasslands, chaparral, and many others. In ar- eas surrounding District Preserves, one finds many of these same com- munities. Connections that link otherwise isolated habitats are known as corridors, and effectively extend the range of a species from one location to many locations in accessible areas. Wildlife corridors may be exten- sive contiguous natural areas suitable for a wide-ranging organism, a stream with a continuous wide buffer of riparian vegetation, or even a tunnel or culvert beneath a highway that allows passage of animals. The District’s Geographic Setting The District’s sphere of influence, spanning the San Francisco Peninsula from the Pacific Ocean in San Mateo County to the baylands in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties, is drawn along both natural and political bound- aries. The District encompasses much of the northern portion of the Santa Cruz Mountains, numerous foothills and ridges of that mountain system, and more than 50 miles of coastline, both on the Pacific Ocean and the San Francisco Bay. The Santa Cruz Mountains are a local spur of the Coast Range, and are physically separated from the larger system by the Golden Gate to the north, the Santa Clara Valley to the east and south, and the Pajaro Valley to the south. The closest adjacent mountains and foothills with a similar suite of resident species are the Gabilan Range and the Diablo Range, and it is with these regions that biological exchange is both most likely and most critical. Although the Santa Cruz Mountains are geographically separate from the nearby mountain ranges, they share many of the same species, and are interconnected through routes of migration and dispersal. These connections often referred to as “wildlife corridors,” commonly follow watercourses into and out of the foothills and valleys. In the San Francisco Bay region and elsewhere, wildlife corridors are frequently intersected by roads and highways. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES HABITAT CONNECTIVITY 73 Habitats in the Santa Cruz Mountains are both connected to and isolated from comparable habitats in nearby areas. This means that interaction between local and neighboring plant and animal populations is governed by their need and ability to move across areas that are inhospitable or even hazardous to survival of the population. These barriers can take many forms, and have differing effects on various species. Furthermore, as humans modify the natural environment, pre-existing boundaries to plant and animal movement can change dramatically. Modified habitat connectivity may result from new roads or houses, changing vegetation, or even from the effects of climatic changes on habitat distribution. Habitat features are just one aspect of a functioning interdependent ecosystem; thus, the permeability of geographic barriers is a complex and ever-chang- ing relationship. It is a function not only of the species’ capacity for cross- ing barriers, but also of the obstacles themselves. Basic Habitat Ecology An ecosystem’s many habitats form a complex mosaic on the landscape. They may gradually transform from one to another, or change suddenly at a natural or a man made boundary. Two or more habitats may coexist or form a relationship, as when a stream, a linear habitat for fish, insects, and riparian plants, flows through an oak woodland, which is found only where specific kinds of soil type, water availability, and weather conditions occur. Habitats may also be partially or completely interrupted, as when a broad river bisects a grassy plain, a highway passes through the redwoods, or a meadow forms in the woods. Both the relative size and extent of a habitat’s connectivity to other habitats are key factors in its ability to support the plants and animals that depend on it, and in the variety of species, or biodiversity, it can support. Typi- cally, the most resilient and diverse habitats are large areas connected by corridors along which wide-ranging animals can travel, plants can propa- gate, genetic interchange can occur, populations can move in response to environmental changes and natural disasters, and species at risk can be replenished from other areas. For habitats in the District, migratory and genetic linkage with neighboring mountain ranges, where many of the same plant and animals live and reproduce, is important for overall popu- lation health. Species living in small, isolated patches of habitat are more vulnerable to disease, population pressures, predation, and other Preserving contiguous natural habitats is key to preserving biodiversity in a changing world. When a species is reduced to a few isolated populations due to fragmentation of its habitat, a natural stressor such as a fire or drought can wipe out a significant portion of the remnant population, bringing it closer to extinction. Connected habitats help species respond to changes in their environment. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES HABITAT CONNECTIVITY 74 stresses. Such isolation can also lead to inbreeding, which compromises genetic diversity and contributes to instability of species populations. This need for habitat connectivity is particularly true of wide-ranging animals such as mountain lions, eagles, or salmon, but is also applicable at smaller scales. For example, movement across a small road can be critical for the newt that must locate a valuable food source or find a mate. To support a viable population over the long term, a given species needs an uninterrupted patch of suitable habitat of a particular size. The needed size varies, but always greatly exceeds the range of one individual. This core habitat is bordered by edges that can fill some of an organism’s needs, but do not support stable populations. The largest patches have a high proportion of core habitats, but also provide edge zones. Barriers to movement such as roads, homes, or walls cause habitat fragmentation, in which multiple smaller edge habitats are formed. Habitat fragmentation can greatly diminish the viability of the ecosystem. As habitats become fragmented, the amount of core habitat decreases while edge habitat in- creases. This can greatly reduce habitat viability for species with unique requirements such as nesting owls or murrelets, or increase predation by edge-adapted predators such as cats or raccoons. Types of Movement and Barriers to Movement Movement of plant and animal species occurs at every scale, from the small matter of crossing a trail to the significant task of climbing a moun- tain. Furthermore, movement of species can be described not only as locomotion, or movement of individuals, but also as dispersal of eggs, seeds, or larvae. Although the challenges to a single individual can be seen as an effective model for their whole species, habitat networks are more specifically relevant to populations than to individuals. Various spe- cies use these corridors frequently, seasonally, or only on rare occasions. Again, the large and wide-ranging animals utilize regional scale habitat networks most heavily, while smaller scale networks may occur between one stream and a woodland for frogs or among interconnected grasslands for a population of deer. The District’s boundaries encompass many of the remaining undeveloped habitats within the San Francisco Peninsula. The main connection for the plants and animals inhabiting District habitats is through relatively narrow corridors at the southern end of the Santa Cruz Mountain Range and across the Santa Clara Valley. Smaller thoroughfares, residential construction, and some natural features are hindrances to the movement of smaller animals and distribution of plants. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES HABITAT CONNECTIVITY 75 HABITAT CONNECTIVITY GOAL, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal HC- Protect ecosystem integrity by maximizing habitat connectivity. Policy HC-1 Identify and include habitat connectivity from a local and re- gional scale in strategic land acquisition planning. ♦ Maximize habitat connectivity for priority plant and wildlife species in new property purchases. ♦ Actively participate and coordinate with regional and local land preser- vation groups and resource agencies to develop strategic goals for protecting or purchasing critical habitat areas and/or movement corri- dors. ♦ Emphasize protection of extensive and interconnected open space habitats. Policy HC-2 Identify and protect existing habitat networks to prevent fur- ther compromise to ecosystem integrity. (See WM-2: Meas- ure3) ♦ Evaluate existing facilities and land uses that impact habitat connec- tivity and riparian corridors and prepare plans for protection or resto- ration, as appropriate. ♦ Identify wildlife movement patterns and high value habitat features and formulate site-specific habitat management goals. ♦ Encourage field research activities including collecting, trapping, and tracking in support of studies that can inform District management of natural resources and ecosystems. ♦ Incorporate construction practices that avoid the creation of unneces- sary barriers to habitat connectivity. Where feasible, utilize removable Wildlife corridors, or the paths of movement between patches of an animal’s distribution, are only one component of an effectively connected habitat. As the science of biogeography and population dynamics develops, wildlife corridors have come to mean structures or narrow reserves set aside for crossing highways at pinch points or along established migration routes. Habitat networks are a more resilient and extensive linkage of suitable environments that support dynamic and mobile populations of plants and animals. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES HABITAT CONNECTIVITY 76 fencing, wildlife friendly silt trapping devices, and other design fea- tures that allow passage of plants and animals during and after project implementation ♦ Evaluate the existing habitat values of human-made structures prior to removal. ♦ Strive to connect isolated natural areas through movement corridors to facilitate connection across barrier(s). ♦ Identify unique or locally rare habitat types and target for protection. Strive to maximize habitat connectivity for locally rare habitats such as serpentine grassland, valley oak woodlands, coastal terrace prairie, etc. Policy HC-3 Collaborate with neighboring land holders and surrounding agencies to support regional efforts to establish and main- tain habitat networks. (See WM-2: Measure 3 and WM-3: Measure 3) ♦ Advocate for land use plans and policies that preserve the District’s biogeographic connectivity with the greater Santa Cruz Mountains and with the neighboring Gabilan and Diablo Ranges. ♦ Review and comment on land use decisions that impact habitat con- nectivity within the District’s jurisdiction and bioregion, including con- struction or modification of roads and proposals for large scale devel- opments. Policy HC-4 Restore, maintain or enhance local habitat networks formed within or incorporating Preserves and other protected lands. (See WM-2: Measure 3 and WM-3: Measure 3) ♦ Review and comment on land use decisions that impact habitats con- tiguous to those located on District Preserves. Recommend and sup- port measures to maintain connected and undegraded habitats where possible. ♦ Protect and restore known habitats of rare, endangered, or special status species, taking into consideration the legal protection, distribu- tion and abundance, and risk to specific resources involved. Early results from the Bay Area Puma Project indicate that Highway 17 may act as barrier to movement within the Santa Cruz Mountains. If mountain lions are not able to actively cross this barrier, it can result in a loss of con- nectivity leading to an iso- lated population of lions on the San Francisco Penin- sula. Over time this isolated population may lose genetic diversity and become vulner- able to disease, predation, and other stressors. Multiple agency and landowner coop- eration are needed to effec- tively address this issue. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES HABITAT CONNECTIVITY 77 ♦ Designate sensitive habitat areas and, if necessary, limit or exclude public access to these areas for resource protection. ♦ Evaluate impacts on wildlife movement and habitat connectivity when planning trails and other facilities. ♦ Identify and protect established wildlife crossings to allow movement across existing roads. Where appropriate, modify established cross- ings to improve habitat features. ♦ Collaborate with resource agencies to restore and enhance the habi- tats of protected and special status species known to utilize preserve areas. Policy HC-5 Preserve and enhance riparian, stream, and other wetland habitat locally and at a watershed level to provide important habitat connections. (See WM-2: Measure 3) ♦ Inventory and assess stream reaches accessible to anadromous fish- eries to identify impediments to fish passage and opportunities for habitat enhancement. Remove artificial barriers to fish passage where removal would enhance spawning and rearing habitats. ♦ Enhance spawning and rearing habitats for native fisheries through restoration. Prioritize restoration and enhancement of areas providing habitat to sensitive species. ♦ Restore hydrologic processes altered by human activity by installing erosion control materials and structures, and minimizing culverts and drainage diversions where appropriate, and using improved drainage structures that minimize alteration of hydrology. ♦ Participate in regional watershed management planning and restora- tion activities. ♦ Identify and remove invasive species in riparian, stream and wetland habitats that act as a barrier to wildlife use Streams can be thought of as linear habitat corridors, particularly for fish that migrate from land to sea. Anadromous fish, such as steelhead trout, return from the open ocean as adults to freshwater streams to breed. Human activities have greatly altered and degraded many of the streams in the Bay Area primarily through barriers to fish passage, such as road culverts and dams and through degradation of spawning habitats by excessive sedimentation of spawning gravels. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 78 XV. WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT BACKGROUND The Mediterranean climate of California’s San Francisco Bay Area affords District lands an unparalleled diversity of plants and habitats; from red- wood forests on the coast and northern portions of the District to dry chap- arral habitats and hardwood (oak, madrone) dominated forests in the southern end of the District. Given the diversity of rainfall, climate, vege- tation, soil and geology, one constant emerges throughout the District (and in fact throughout California); all landscapes have been subject to periodic fires through time. The present and future will be no different. To understand the role of wildland fire on District lands, it is important to understand the past. Native Americans within the area utilized fire as a tool for improving wildlife habitat for grazing animals (deer, elk, rabbits), maintaining productive vegetation communities for food procurement (grasslands, oak woodlands), to maintain travel routes, and to manage pests. Burning by Native Americans took place for thousands of years, a practice that significantly increased the frequency of fire locally. These practices, in addition to the benefits listed above, greatly reduced much of the fuel load on the ground and significantly reduced the severity of fires within these fire managed landscapes. Many of the vegetation communities on District lands evolved with the oc- currence of periodic fire and have acquired unique adaptations to with- stand and regenerate after a fire. Without periodic fire, these plant com- munities build abnormally high and dangerous fuel levels and are suscep- tible to large scale destructive fire events. Fire is a natural occurrence on the landscape; our challenge is to find ways to live safely with fire. From 1860 through the early 1920’s unprecedented alterations took place within the forests of the Santa Cruz Mountains. The ancient “old growth” forests were mostly clear-cut and burned. This removed the largest, most fire-resistant trees from the forested landscape. The forest that has grown back typically consists of a much higher density of trees that are more susceptible to fire. This period of time also corresponded to the first wave ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 79 of development within the San Francisco Bay Region and ushered in a new paradigm for wildland fire response: immediate suppression. This has increased the time interval between fires on most land to time periods substantially longer than Native American burning and natural lightning-caused fire. The result is a vegetated landscape that has largely been prevented from burning, and that has accumulated fuel loads and structural characteristics that have not occurred on the landscape for thou- sands of years, if ever. The District was formed in response to the observed population growth and development pressure within the San Francisco Bay Region of the late 1900’s. This has substantially reduced residential development in some areas, and significantly decreased the level of fire risk by precluding development that would have likely otherwise resulted in additional high risk communities. Nonetheless, there is some residential development (including some on District property) intermixed with District Preserves that deserve consideration. The wildland-urban interface (WUI) refers to areas where residential de- velopment, from a few scattered houses to larger subdivisions or commu- nities, exist immediately adjacent to or nearby parks, open space pre- serves, or other relatively undeveloped “wildlands”. Important issues within this interface include defensible space around residential struc- tures, emergency vehicle access, and residential fire improvements such as water tanks, fire hydrants, sprinklers, and fire resistant construction techniques. The District is an active participant in coordinating with various fire agen- cies and community fire planning efforts. District participation in these planning efforts will continue. These include the development of regional fire plans, Fire Safe Council meetings, and the preparation of Commu- nity Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPs). The District also coordinates with local fire agencies and other park agencies conducting and participat- ing in prescribed fire for resource management purposes. The District, for many years, has undertaken various wildland fire man- agement practices to effectively manage fuel loads and decrease wildland fire risk. Among these, the District annually maintains a series of disc lines (where vegetation is mechanically disked with a tractor to reduce dry fuel along ignition sources such as roads); vegetation is mowed or brushed back from roads and trails; roads, parking areas, and Preserve entrances The WUI is an area where urban ignition sources such as vehicles, equipment, burn piles, barbeques, chimneys, smoking, fireworks, etc. from adjacent residential properties and public streets pose a threat to Open Space lands. Residential structures can also supply fuel for fire that can cross into open space lands. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 80 are maintained to provide access for District patrol vehicles and other emergency vehicles; and vegetation is cleared from around District struc- tures and residences. Preserve access points are closed when appropri- ate during periods of high fire risk. The District possesses a number of firefighting apparatus including a water tank truck, and smaller water tanks with hoses outfitted on Ranger vehicles, as well as portable water- pack/spray outfits for individual personnel. Fire training is also provided to District personnel who may be involved in combating wildland fire. The District has an active vegetation management program that has been targeting invasive plant species that can be fire hazards, such as eucalyptus and French broom. Active livestock grazing is being main- tained and has been re-introduced on some Preserves to reduce the fuel loads in the mostly non-native grasslands. Conservation grazing is being used to encourage the vigor of native grasses and forbs that typically pro- duce less fuel (thatch). Given their year-round growth cycle, perennial native grasses maintain moisture later into the dry season, reducing fire hazard. The vegetation management program at the District also utilizes prescribed fire for managing invasive species in addition to fuel load re- duction benefits. The substantial historic alterations of the landscape, the history of fire suppression, and the numerous jurisdictions involved in wildland fire management and suppression, present challenges in managing wildland fire, but also present many opportunities. Effective wildland fire manage- ment actions can be undertaken to reduce the severity of fires within the WUI and within the District’s ecosystems and watersheds, when fires inevitably occur. Additionally, active management can achieve conditions suitable for the reintroduction of fire into many ecosystems, an ecological function that has been absent, except under atypically severe conditions, for most of the past century. Prescribed fire is a powerful tool that not only has ecological benefit, but also significant wildland fire management ben- efit. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 81 WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT GOAL, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal WF- Manage District land to reduce the severity of wildland fire and to reduce the impact of fire sup- pression activities within District Preserves and adjacent residential areas; manage habitats to support fire as a natural occurrence on the land- scape; and promote District and regional fire man- agement objectives. Policy WF-1 Implement necessary fire and fuel management practices to protect public health and safety, protect natural resources, and to reduce the impacts of wildland fire. ♦ Prepare wildland fire management plans for District lands that ad- dress, at a minimum, public safety, District staff and firefighter safety, District infrastructure including residences and roads, natural resource protection (particularly special status species), cultural resources, and vegetation management for fire protection and fire behavior and hazardous fuels modification. ♦ Identify, with input from responsible fire agencies and neighboring public agencies, essential roads for wildland fire access. Maintain designated roads for fire access and patrol purposes, and improve with surfacing, additional turnouts and safety zones when necessary. ♦ Coordinate with fire agencies and local communities to identify loca- tions where additional fire infrastructure is desirable and practical (e.g. hydrants, water tanks, helicopter zones, safety zones, fuel breaks, consistent with the incident command system (ICS). Work cooper- atively with these groups to install needed infrastructure. ♦ Work with Cal Fire and other appropriate fire management and regu- latory agencies to develop and carry out plans that use prescribed burns to maintain and restore natural systems. ♦ Maintain adequate fire clearance around District structures and facili- ties. (See FM-5 and WF-4:Measure 5) ♦ Require lessees of District land or structures to maintain fire hazard reduction measures as directed. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 82 ♦ Prohibit activities that have a high risk of sparking fires during periods of extreme fire hazard. ♦ Close Preserve areas of particular concern during extreme fire weather, as appropriate, and increase patrol levels where appropri- ate. ♦ Seek grant opportunities and partnerships for fuel management and monitoring projects. Policy WF-2 Aggressively support the immediate suppression of all un- planned fires that threaten human life, private property or public safety. ♦ Respond to wildland and structure fires on District lands in coordina- tion with responding fire agencies. ♦ Prioritize and prepare Preserve specific wildland fire response plans that identify appropriate fire suppression activities for District lands in the event of a wildland fire. Plans should include detailed maps of infrastructure such as roads, fuel breaks, structures, water sources (hydrants, water tanks, ponds), as well as sensitive natural and cul- tural resources to be avoided during fire suppression activities. ♦ Direct bulldozer actions to areas identified in wildland fire response plans to minimize and reduce ground disturbance, erosion, and reha- bilitation efforts wherever possible. ♦ Develop guidelines for appropriate rehabilitation measures to address erosion, revegetation, invasive species, trail and road stability, secu- rity, public safety, and natural and cultural resources following fires. Policy WF-3 Work with adjacent landowners and fire agencies to main- tain adequate fire clearance around qualifying structures. (See FM-5 and WF-1: Measure 5) ♦ Maintain a permit system that enables adjacent landowners to main- tain defensible space clearance surrounding homes and other qualify- ing structures across property boundaries and onto District land as long as the activity is recommended by the local fire agency and is consistent with the District’s resource management policies, including protection of environmentally sensitive habitat. ♦ Work with fire agencies and local governments to develop require- ments for new development to maintain required fire clearance dis- tance from District land wherever possible. Defensible space is the area adjacent to a structure where basic wildfire protection practices are implemented, providing a key point of defense for an approaching wildland fire or area to escape from a structure fire. Cal Fire publishes guidelines for fuel (vegetation) treatments to create a perimeter around buildings and structures in order to maintain minimum conditions for firefighters to defend a property. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 83 ♦ Focus fuel management activities in areas adjacent to development, essential facilities and improvements, major egress and emergency routes, essential fuel breaks, and sensitive natural and cultural areas. ♦ Investigate alternative funding sources in conjunction with fire agen- cies and residential communities within the WUI adjacent to District Preserves to fund and implement fire hazard reduction projects. ♦ Work with fire agencies and residential communities to ensure that adequate evacuation routes and vegetation clearance around struc- tures are maintained on adjacent non-District lands. ♦ Coordinate with fire agencies and local communities to define loca- tions where community and regional fire protection infrastructure is desirable and practical. Policy WF-4 Manage District vegetation communities to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire and to maintain biological diversity. (See VM-1 and FM-6) ♦ Promote the restoration and development of late-seral forest com- munities. ♦ Evaluate the potential to reduce forest fuel loading through the re- moval of smaller trees to reduce forest floor fuel buildup and ladder fuels. ♦ Continue to utilize and expand the District’s conservation grazing pro- gram to reduce grassland fuels, brush encroachment, and encourage the vigor of native grass and forb species. ♦ Manage forest diseases such as Sudden Oak Death (SOD). ♦ Manage scrub, shrub, and chaparral communities to maintain a mo- saic of ages and species within strategic management corridors on roads, ridgetops, and near residential development or other critical in- frastructure to compartmentalize preserves and reduce fuel loads. Policy WF-5 Conduct prescribed burns to re-introduce fire into native ecosystems and maintain natural ecological processes on District lands. ♦ Continue to utilize fire as a resource management tool to reduce fuels and reestablish fire for resource benefit where vegetation conditions, access, and public safety permit. Coordinate with other agencies for planning and implementation. Sudden Oak Death mortality is also a potential concern within the wildland- urban interface area, as well as within other areas of District Preserves. This concern is currently being studied by researchers in conjunction with District staff. These studies should provide additional insight into the potential fire hazard associated with SOD mortality and propose effective management options. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 84 ♦ Continue to utilize prescribed fire to reduce and prevent unwanted fire damage resulting from excessive fuel load and altered plant commu- nity structure and to control invasive species. ♦ Conduct prescribed burns in an ecologically sound manner which mimic natural fire regimes, and to promote biodiversity. ♦ Conduct public outreach to recreational users, adjacent landowners and the general public through mailings, web site postings and press releases related to the benefits of prescribed fire and other fire man- agement activities. Policy WF-6 Foster and maintain interagency fire management partner- ships. ♦ Annually coordinate with fire management and other resource agen- cies to discuss pre-fire planning conditions and needs in advance of the fire season. ♦ Participate in county Fire Safe Councils and Community Wildfire Pro- tection Plan (CWPP) efforts. ♦ Train with fire agencies and participate in training burns when possi- ble. ♦ Complete and distribute to fire agencies up-to-date maps of Preserve infrastructure including existing road network available for wildland fire management, helicopter landing zones, safety zones, evacuation routes, and other pertinent information. Policy WF-7 Conduct research and monitoring to refine fire management practices. ♦ Monitor pre-project vegetation, soil, erosion, and water quality to es- tablish baseline conditions for post project analysis. ♦ Monitor post fire and vegetation management projects to assess the achievement of project objectives and to identify potential impacts to vegetation, soil, erosion, and water quality. ♦ Conduct monitoring in a manner consistent with other land manage- ment agencies to obtain comparable data. ♦ Foster relationships with educational institutions, scientists and other land management professionals to inform District land management decisions based upon sound, current science, and to create opportu- nities for continuing research. Seek grants and pursue partnerships for research and monitoring. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 85 ♦ Integrate wildland fire management into District interpretation and education programs. Policy WF-8 Wildland Fire management actions on District lands in the Coastside Protection Area will be in accordance with the pol- icies established in the Service Plan for the San Mateo Coastal Annexation Area. ♦ In consultation with the County of San Mateo Environmental Services Department and fire agencies, determine whether the construction of dry hydrants on specific lands acquired is feasible in order to provide additional remote area water supplies for fire suppression activities ♦ Select native plant materials and/or seed mixes utilized at staging ar- eas or along trails for their low maintenance and drought and fire re- sistant characteristics to minimize additional fuel available to wildland fires to the extent feasible. ♦ Where compatible with other trail characteristics, planners shall locate trail alignments and access points to allow trails to also serve as emer- gency access routes for patrol or emergency medical transport. Where feasible for more remote areas, emergency helicopter landing sites shall be provided. ♦ Coordinate with appropriate agencies, such as the County and Cal Fire to formalize mutual aid agreements. ♦ Consult with fire agencies in developing site-specific fuel modifica- tion and management programs for specific lands acquired as part of its Use and Management planning process, in addition to continuing the current District fuel management practices. ♦ Prohibit smoking, firearms, fireworks and off-road vehicle use and limit trail use, picnicking, and camping to designated activities. ♦ Develop and maintain staging areas and trail heads in accordance with the wildland fire hazard mitigation measures established in the Service Plan for the Coastside Protection Area. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CLIMATE CHANGE 86 XVI. CLIMATE CHANGE BACKGROUND Climate change is directly affecting temperatures, precipitation, weather patterns, species ranges, wildfire risk, and sea levels, impacting the Dis- trict’s ability to meet its resource management goals. Human activities that put excess greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, such as burning fos- sil fuels for transportation and energy generation, are the leading cause of climate change. Impacts on Natural Systems According to the National Park Service, the wide range of climate change impacts in the Bay Area include the following: ♦ Increase in average annual temperatures of 1.2 degrees Celsius (2.2 degrees Fahrenheit) between 1960 and 2010 ♦ Northern shifts in winter bird ranges of 0.5 kilometers (0.3 miles) per year between 1975 and 2004 ♦ Upward shifts in elevation for 12 percent of endemic species and 27 percent of non-native species between the periods of 1895-1970 and 1971-2009 ♦ Sea level rise of 22 centimeters (9 inches) between 1854 and 2016 ♦ Decrease in coastal fog by 33 percent between the periods of 1901- 1925 and 1951-2008 ♦ Increase in heavy storms by 25 percent between the periods of 1901- 1960 and 1991-2000 ♦ Human-caused climate change accounted for 10-20% of the 2012- 2014 drought ♦ Climate was the dominant factor controlling the extent of wildfire burn areas between 1916 and 2003, even during periods of active fire sup- pression Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, contribute to the atmospheric warming “greenhouse effect” by absorbing infrared radiation. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CLIMATE CHANGE 87 The Carbon Cycle The carbon cycle is a natural process by which carbon moves between different stores or reservoirs, such as the atmosphere, oceans, sedimen- tary rocks, soils, and plant biomass. When burning fossil fuels, humans move a massive amount of carbon from the ground to the atmosphere, putting the carbon cycle out of balance and causing climate change. The two key approaches to solving climate change are 1) to avoid adding any more carbon to the atmospheric store and 2) to move carbon from the atmospheric store to safer stores, such as plant biomass and soils. Hu- mans can avoid adding more carbon to the atmospheric store by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and preventing the release of carbon in plants and soils. Humans can facilitate the movement of carbon from the atmosphere into plant biomass and soils, also known as carbon sequestration, through land conservation and management. The District stewards over 63,000 acres of open space lands, including redwood for- ests, which store large amounts of carbon in trees, other vegetation, and soils. CLIMATE CHANGE GOAL, POLICIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES Goal CC- Reduce agency-generated greenhouse gas emis- sions, increase carbon sequestration, and pro- mote resilience to climate change impacts Policy CC-1 Reduce administrative greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 20% below 2016 baseline by 2022, 40% below 2016 base- line by 2030, and 80% below 2016 baseline by 2050, in line with the State of California’s GHG reduction goals. ♦ Implement Climate Action Plan strategies to reduce or offset adminis- trative GHG emissions from vehicles, equipment, facilities, employee commuting, and tenant residences. ♦ Periodically update GHG Inventory and track GHG reduction. ♦ Improve GHG Inventory data quality and tracking systems. ♦ Consider GHG emissions related to all policies, plans, decisions, and management practices, in addition to other factors. Carbon sequestration is the process by which carbon is removed from the atmosphere and stored elsewhere, such as in plants and soils. The State of California set a goal to reduce GHG emissions 40% below 1990 baseline levels by 2030 and 80% by 2050 (AB 32). The District first inventoried GHG emissions in 2016 so that is the baseline for the District’s reduction goals. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CLIMATE CHANGE 88 ♦ Evaluate the full life-cycle footprint of equipment, services, and sup- plies, and choose lower impact/responsible services and supplies. ♦ Develop sustainability guidelines for facilities, operations, projects, and events. Policy CC-2 Reduce non-administrative GHG emissions related to Dis- trict activities, such as visitor transportation and livestock. ♦ Implement Climate Action Plan strategies to reduce or offset GHG emissions from visitor transportation to preserves. ♦ Implement Climate Action Plan strategies to reduce or offset GHG emissions from livestock, and research additional techniques or tech- nologies. ♦ Where agricultural sustainability is not a leading factor, select appro- priate livestock species to accomplish vegetation management objec- tives (See GM-4). Policy CC-3 Increase carbon sequestration in vegetation and soils and minimize carbon release from wildfire. ♦ Manage conifer forests to sustain and encourage the development of late-seral habitat conditions (FM-4). Evaluate the potential to reduce forest fuel loading through the removal of smaller trees to reduce fuel buildup and ladder fuels (See FM-5). ♦ Manage vegetation communities to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire and to maintain biological diversity (WF-4). Conduct prescribed burns to re-introduce fire into native ecosystems and maintain natural eco- logical processes on District lands (See WF-5). ♦ Evaluate, study, and implement additional land management strate- gies to increase carbon sequestration in vegetation and soils. ♦ Improve data on carbon sequestration in District lands. ♦ Evaluate opportunities to create and sell carbon offsets on the Califor- nia Cap and Trade market or other voluntary offset markets. Policy CC-4 Prepare for climate change impacts and promote resilience for both natural and built environments. ♦ Prioritize ecosystem function, resilience, and ecological diversity fo- cused on multiple species benefits, rather than aiming to prevent eco- logical change or return to past conditions. District GHG emissions are divided into administrative emissions, which come directly from District operations such as vehicles and facilities, and non- administrative emissions, which are related to District activities but the District has less control over. A numerical GHG reduction goal is set only for administrative emissions. Resilience is the capacity of natural and human communities to withstand and bounce back from climate stress and hazardous events. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES CLIMATE CHANGE 89 ♦ Incorporate climate change impacts on natural resources such as spe- cies range and phenology changes into restoration and monitoring ac- tivities. Utilize an adaptive management framework to adjust resource management methods and priorities as impacts start to occur and cli- mate change knowledge and response options continue to increase (See GM-3). ♦ Support ecological functions and ecosystem services that protect the built environment from climate change impacts, such as flooding and increased wildland fire frequency and intensity. ♦ Incorporate climate change impacts to infrastructure, such as flooding, drought, and sea level rise, into planning, project design, and other relevant activities. ♦ Evaluate, study, and implement additional land management strate- gies to promote ecosystem resilience. Policy CC-5 Lead by example and support state, regional, and commu- nity-scale action on reducing climate change impacts to eco- system health and biodiversity, and increasing ecosystem resilience. ♦ Support and participate in regional climate change initiatives and bur- geoning community of practice. Foster partnerships to respond to cli- mate change collaboratively, and seek opportunities to share infor- mation with other agencies. ♦ Support and influence local and state climate change policies that are protective of ecosystem health and biodiversity. Seek grant opportu- nities to fund implementation of GHG reduction, carbon sequestration, and natural resource resilience efforts. ♦ Increase public awareness of climate change impacts and solutions the District is pursuing through education and outreach. Incorporate climate change into interpretive programming, facilities, and materials (See PI-1). ♦ Coordinate and cooperate with institutions, agencies, organizations, and individuals conducting research on climate change and resource management (See RC-2). ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 90 XVII. GLOSSARY Agricultural Infrastructure – Improvements made to a property to sup- port an agricultural operation such as fencing, roads, water supply sys- tems and structures. (Grazing Management) Anadromous – Fish, such as steelhead trout, that return from the open ocean as adults to freshwater streams to breed. (Water Resources, Habi- tat Connectivity) Archaeological site – A site in which physical evidence of past prehistoric or historic human activity has been preserved. (Cultural Resources) Artifacts – Objects created by humans or modified by human activity. (Cultural Resources) Barrier – An impediment to migration, genetic exchange, dispersal, or other essential movement of an organism. Barriers may be of natural or human-made origin. (Habitat Connectivity) Best Management Practices (BMPs) – District developed standard prac- tices that identify the preferred manner in which an activity is to be per- formed in order to be protective of both human health and the environ- ment. (Vegetation Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Re- sources, Grazing Management, Forest Management) Biodiversity – Describes the natural variety and abundance of plants and animals and the environments in which they live. U.S. Congressional Bi- odiversity Act, 1990 HR1268, defines biodiversity as “The full range of va- riety and variability within and among living organisms, and the ecological complexes in which they occur, and encompass ecosystem or community diversity, species diversity and genetic diversity.” (Vegetation Manage- ment, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Forest Manage- ment, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Biological Legacies – The retention of forest components that were orig- inally present within the forest, prior to large scale disturbance such as fire, or timber harvesting. Notable “legacy” components include: large live ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 91 trees (especially old growth) with mosses and lichen growth within the can- opy, hollow cavities, and complex large branch structure; large pieces of wood on the forest floor; intact forest soil and associated fungi and mi- crobes. These forest components have a profound influence on recovering forest ecosystems and are important considerations for habitat reconnec- tion and restoration. (Forest Management) Boundary – The area of border between habitat patches or vegetation types; a zone comprised of edges of adjacent ecosystems or land types. (Habitat Connectivity) Carbon Sequestration – The process by which carbon is removed from the atmosphere and stored elsewhere, such as in plants and soils. (Cli- mate Change) Chaparral – Shrub and small tree dominated landscapes composed of species with small, thick, evergreen, leathery leaves that often grow dense and tangled. (Vegetation Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) – The Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA), passed in 2003 by the federal government, es- tablished statutory incentives for the US Forest Service (USFS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to give consideration to the priorities of local communities as they develop and implement forest management and hazardous fuel reduction projects. In order for a community to take full advantage of this federal assistance, a community must first prepare a CWPP. CWPPs may address issues such as wildfire response, hazard mitigation, community preparedness, or structure protection—or all of the above. (Wildland Fire) Compartmentalize – Using fire management techniques such as instal- lation of shaded fuel breaks, or defensible space surrounding homes to separate a potentially large scale wildland fire into distinct smaller man- agement areas separated by vegetation type, fuel loading, access, or ter- rain into pre-designated fire management units. (Wildland Fire) Conifer, Coniferous – Cone bearing trees with needles or scale-like leaves, stay green throughout the year in California. Examples include: ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 92 coast redwood, Douglas fir, pine trees, and cypresses. Conifers are also referred to as softwood. (Forest Management, Ecological Succession) Contamination – Human-made waste that has polluted the environment making it unfit or unsafe. (Water Resources, Geology and Soils) Core – The portion of an ecosystem or habitat where effects of the sur- rounding area are limited. (Habitat Connectivity) Cultural Landscape – A landscape modified by past human activity or otherwise holding historical or prehistoric cultural importance. (Cultural Resources, Public Interpretation, Wildland Fire) Cultural Resource – A structure, landscape feature, archaeological site, or other artifact of human activity in the past during prehistoric or historic periods. (Cultural Resources) Cultural Resource Inventory – The District’s inventory of cultural re- sources on District preserves. Information in this inventory may include site locations, descriptions, and photographs, as well as historical infor- mation on individual sites and preserves. (Cultural Resources) Data Recovery – Research and recording techniques such as the exca- vation of archaeological sites or recording of architectural features prior to site disturbance. Data recovery is a common mitigation measure for pro- jects that may have a substantial adverse impact on a significant cultural resource. (Cultural Resources) Defensible Space – Defensible space is the area adjacent to a structure where basic wildfire protection practices are implemented, providing a key point of defense for an approaching wildland fire or area to escape from a structure fire. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) publishes guidelines for fuel (vegetation) treatments to create a perimeter around buildings and structures in order to maintain minimum conditions for firefighters to defend a property. (Wildland Fire) Disturbance (Ecological Disturbance) – The disruption of an ecosys- tem's structure and function, generally with effects that last for time periods ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 93 longer than a single seasonal growing cycle for vegetation. (Wildlife Man- agement, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Geology and Soils, Ecological Succession) Disturbance-dependent – Species that require disturbance to maintain habitat conditions suitable for reproduction and establishment. (Ecological Succession) Ecological Succession – The sequential development of plant and ani- mal communities following disturbance. (Ecological Succession) Ecosystem – An area within the natural environment in which physical (abiotic) factors of the environment, such as rocks and soil, function to- gether along with interdependent (biotic) organisms, such as plants and animals, within the same habitat. (Vegetation Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Grazing Management, Forest Man- agement, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Ecosystem Function – The interaction(s) or ecological processes that exists between organisms with one another and the physical environment, such as nutrient cycling, disturbance, soil development, water budgeting, and flammability. (Vegetation Management, Water Resources, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Edge – The portion of an ecosystem or habitat near its perimeter, where influences of the surroundings prevent development of interior/core-area environmental conditions. (Habitat Connectivity) Enhancement – The process of altering a habitat to provide specific eco- system functions. (Water Resources, Grazing Management, ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity) Enhance – To increase or improve a habitat in value or quality. (Vegeta- tion Management, Wildlife Management, Water Resources, Grazing Man- agement, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectiv- ity) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 94 Environmental Education – A learning process that increases people’s knowledge and awareness about the environment and associated chal- lenges, develops the necessary skills and expertise to address the chal- lenges, and fosters attitudes, motivations, and commitments to make in- formed decisions and take responsible action. (Public Interpretation) Exotic – Species that were not present in the Santa Cruz Mountains re- gion of California prior to the large scale development of the American continent by European humans prior to 1769. (Grazing Management) Extreme Fire Hazard/Weather – The National Weather Service, operat- ing through cooperative agreement with the State of California, issues Red Flag Warnings during conditions of extreme fire weather. This alert is used by fire agencies to plan staffing levels and preparedness and set public use restrictions (such as campfires or the use of spark producing equip- ment). (Wildland Fire) Five-Strand Barbwire Fencing – Fencing typically used in ranching op- erations to confine livestock to established areas, constructed of five evenly spaced rows of barbwire stretched between posts comprised of wood or metal. (Grazing Management) Flora – The plants of a particular region or period. (Grazing Management) Fire Agencies – Agencies with jurisdiction to respond to wildland and structure fires on District lands and that may work in cooperation with the District in planning site-specific fuel and wildland fire management prac- tices and in conducting training in fire and fuel management. They can include Cal Fire as well as local, regional, city, county and special district fire agencies. (Wildland Fire, Forest Management) Fire Behavior – The manner in which a fire reacts to fuel, weather, topog- raphy, or fire suppression efforts. (Wildland Fire) Fire Regime – The characteristic frequency, extent, intensity, severity, and seasonality of fires within an ecosystem. (Wildland Fire) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 95 Fire Safe Councils – The Fire Safe Council is a coalition of public and private organizations with a common, shared interest in reducing losses from wildfires. (Wildland Fire) Fire Suppression – Human efforts connected with fire-extinguishing op- erations, such as use of tools, engines, water or aircraft, or installation of fuel breaks, or removal of fuels surrounding homes or other structures. (Vegetation Management, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Food Web – The relationships between interconnected plants and ani- mals in an ecosystem pertaining to how each organism gets their food and meets energy requirements. (Integrated Pest Management) Forbs – A broad-leaved herb other than a grass, especially one growing in a field, prairie, or meadow. (Grazing Management, Wildland Fire) Forest – Habitats dominated by tree species with a continuous or nearly continuous canopy covering substantial portions of the landscape. (Vege- tation Management, Wildlife Management, Forest Management, Ecologi- cal Succession, Wildland Fire) Forest Conditions – A characterization of forest age, structural complex- ity (height, spacing, multiple canopy levels), species composition, habitat suitability, biological legacies, fuel loads, diseases or pathogens, regener- ation, and level of disturbance. (Forest Management) Forest Management – The active stewardship of a forest or stand to achieve a desired future condition. (Forest Management) Fuel – Combustible vegetation including live or dead forbs, shrubs, branches, trees, vines etc. (Vegetation Management, Grazing Manage- ment, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Fuel Break – A strip of land on which vegetation has been removed, re- duced, thinned, or otherwise modified so that a fire burning into or up to it can be more readily controlled (Wildland Fire) Fuel Load – The oven-dry weight of fuel per unit area. (Wildland Fire) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 96 Fuel Modification – Breaking up, thinning, reducing, or otherwise modi- fying continuous fuels to prevent or reduce the spread of a wildfire. (Wildland Fire) Fuel Wood – Woody vegetation or wood products, primarily used as fuel for heating, cooking, or industry. (Forest Management) GIS (Geographic Information System) – A combined database and mapping system used for the storage, retrieval, and analysis of geographic data. (Integrated Pest Management, Research and Collection) GIS Database – A database that contains information about the location of real-world features and the characteristics of those features. (Integrated Pest Management, Research and Collection) Geologic Hazards – Hazards created by fault zones, landslide prone ar- eas, and flood zones. (Geology and Soils) Greenhouse Gases – Gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and ni- trous oxide that contribute to the atmospheric warming “greenhouse effect” by absorbing infrared radiation. (Climate Change) Habitat – the combination of living and non-living factors that surround and potentially influence an organism; or species’ typical environment. (Vegetation Management, Wildlife Management, Integrated Pest Manage- ment, Water Resources, Scenic and Aesthetic, Grazing Management, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Habitat Fragmentation – the breaking up of a previously continuous hab- itat (or ecosystem) into spatially separated and smaller pieces. (Wildlife Management, Forest Management) Hardwood – Broadleaf trees that usually produce flowers that ripen into fruits containing seeds. Local examples include: numerous oak species, madrone, tanoak, willows, and western sycamore. (Forest Management, Wildland Fire) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 97 Hazard Mitigation – action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards such as proximity of flammable vegetation, dead or dying tree limbs, or pollution or contamination in close proximity to homes or public facilities. (Wildland Fire) High Priority District Forests – Forests that have been identified through inventories or other analysis as priority areas for forest management. Pri- ority can be based on different management objectives such as: restoring degraded habitat, reconnecting late-seral habitat, and/or wildland- urban interface fire concerns. (Forest Management) Historic – Dating from periods post-dating the use of written historical documents. In the American West, the historic period is generally consid- ered to refer to all periods after European exploration and colonization of the region. (Water Resources, Scenic and Aesthetic, Cultural Resources, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Wildland Fire) Historical Rehabilitation – “The act or process of making possible a com- patible use for a property through repair, alterations and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural values.” (Definition from Secretary of the Interior’s Stand- ards for Treatment of Historic Properties) (Cultural Resources) Host – A plant or animal that provides sustenance for another organism. (Integrated Pest Management) Inbreeding Depression – The decrease in growth, survival and fertility of an individual often observed following mating among relatives or self-fer- tilization (in plants). (Wildlife Management) Incident Command System (ICS) – a standardized, on-scene, all-hazard incident management concept. ICS allows its users to adopt an integrated organizational structure to match the complexities and demands of single or multiple incidents without being hindered by jurisdictional boundaries. (Wildland Fire) In Situ – “In place;” at the site of original deposition or discovery. (Cultural Resources) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 98 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) – A long-term strategy that specifi- cally reviews alternatives and monitors conditions to effectively control a target pest with minimum impact to human health, the environment, and non-target organisms. (Integrated Pest Management) Interpretation – A communication method that aims to reveal meanings, connections, and relationships by firsthand experience, and by illustrative media. (Cultural Resources, Public Interpretation, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Interpretive Systems Plan (ISP) – An overarching analysis of the inter- pretive opportunities that exist throughout an agency’s parks or preserves. (Public Interpretation) Invasive Species – animal or plant species that take over sufficiently large areas to reduce biodiversity. (Integrated Pest Management, Grazing Man- agement, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Ladder Fuels – Live or dead vegetation that allows a fire to ascend from low lying vegetation such as forbs and grasses, into the upper or upper- most vegetation such as taller shrubs and trees. Common fuel ladders in- clude tall grasses, shrubs, and tree branches, both living and dead. (Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Late-Seral – Stage of forest development dominated by large mature trees. Initial age development of this stage for redwood and Douglas-fir forests is generally considered to occur between 80- and 300 years. Trees and forest begin to develop some characteristics associated with old growth including large decadent trees, snags and large down logs. (Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Late-Successional – Same as late-seral. (Forest Management) Livestock – The horses, cattle, sheep, and other useful animals kept or raised on a farm or ranch. (Integrated Pest Management, Geology and Soils, Grazing Management, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Wildland Fire) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 99 Native – Those elements of the natural world occurring within an ecosys- tem prior to disturbance from an outside event. (Vegetation Management, Wildlife Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Geology and Soils, Scenic and Aesthetic, Cultural Resources, Research and Collection, Grazing Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Natural – Plant, animal, and microorganism life, native materials, and eco- system processes that make up the physical world. (Vegetation Manage- ment, Wildlife Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Re- sources, Geology and Soils, Scenic and Aesthetic, Cultural Resources, Research and Collection, Public Interpretation, Grazing Management, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Non-Native – Species which moved into, or were introduced into, pre- serve environments as a direct or indirect result of human activities. (Veg- etation Management, Wildlife Management, Integrated Pest Management, Geology and Soils, Scenic and Aesthetic, Grazing Management, Ecologi- cal Succession, Wildland Fire) Non-Target Organisms – those plants and animals that are not intention- ally targeted by a pest management strategy in order to spare benign and often beneficial species. (Integrated Pest Management) Northwest Information Center – A clearing house for historical and ar- chaeological information associated with the California Historical Re- sources Information System, which houses historical documents, site re- ports and other research pertaining to cultural resources in Northwest Cal- ifornia. (Cultural Resources) Old Growth – Stand or residual (uncut) trees in excess of 200 years old, often characterized by very large trees, large plated bark, broken, dead or forked tops, with a prevalence of mosses and lichens on large branches within the canopy. Old growth stands also typically include large snags and large downed logs. (Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Open Space – Land and water areas that remain in a natural state and are minimally developed, and may include compatible agriculture uses. ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 100 (Wildlife Management, Water Resources, Geology and Soils, Scenic and Aesthetic, Cultural Resources, Public Interpretation, Grazing Manage- ment, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Outreach – The communication of the District’s mission and goals to a wide variety of audiences usually conducted away from the office or pre- serves. (Integrated Pest Management, Public Interpretation, Forest Man- agement, Wildland Fire) Patch – A relatively homogenous type of habitat that is spatially separated from other similar habitat and differs from its surroundings. (Habitat Con- nectivity) Pathogen – A disease causing organism. (Vegetation Management, For- est Management) Performance Measure(s) – Parameter(s) used to measure project suc- cess tied to project goals and objectives. Pesticides – A broad term used to describe any material (natural, organic, or synthetic) used to control or prevent pests including herbicides (weed or plant killers), insecticides (insect killers), and rodenticides (rodent kill- ers). (Integrated Pest Management) Pests – Animals or plants that proliferate beyond natural control and in- terfere with the natural processes which would otherwise occur on open space lands. (Integrated Pest Management, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Plant Community – A group of plants growing in an interrelated manner on a particular site. (Vegetation Management, Integrated Pest Manage- ment, Ecological Succession, Wildland Fire) Predation – a biological interaction where a predator (an organism that is hunting or browsing) feeds on its prey (the organism that is hunted or con- sumed). (Integrated Pest Management, Wildlife Management, Habitat Connectivity) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 101 Prehistoric – Dating from periods of human activity prior to the use of written history. In the American West, prehistory generally refers to all periods before European colonization of the region. (Cultural Resources) Prescribed Fire – Fire applied to wildland ecosystems under specified fuel and weather conditions to accomplish predetermined resource man- agement objective such as regeneration of sensitive species in a fire- adapted plant community. (Wildland Fire) Programming – The regularly scheduled organized, topic-specific presentations or other delivery of information, including community out- reach, education, interpretation, and docent led activities, or other special events. (Public Interpretation) Residual Dry Matter (RDM) – A measure of the amount of vegetation left on the ground, typically measured at the end of the summer or fall. Ap- propriate levels of RDM strive to minimize thatch, which can inhibit new plant growth, while maintaining adequate levels of vegetation to prohibit soil erosion. (Grazing Management) Resilience – The capacity of natural and human communities to withstand and bounce back from climate stress and hazardous events. (Climate Change) Resource Integrity – The extent to which character-defining features of a resource or its research potential remain intact. (Cultural Resources) Resource Management – Management of both natural and cultural re- sources. Natural resource management generally consists of protecting, restoring, enhancing and monitoring native vegetation and wildlife, and monitoring and protecting the quality of geological and hydrological condi- tions. Cultural resource management consists of identifying and evaluat- ing archeological sites and cultural landscapes. (Vegetation Management, Geology and Soils, Research and Collection, Public Interpretation, Graz- ing Management, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Resources – Plants, animals, water, soil, terrain, geologic formations, his- toric, scenic, and cultural features. (Vegetation Management, Wildlife Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Geology ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 102 and Soils, Scenic and Aesthetic, Cultural Resources, Research and Col- lection, Public Interpretation, Grazing Management, Forest Management, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Restoration – The process of returning land that has been degraded and disturbed into functional habitat. (Vegetation Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Research and Collection, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) Restore – To bring back to or put back into a former or original state. (Vegetation Management, Geology and Soils, Public Interpretation, Graz- ing Management, Forest Management, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Revegetation – The process of replacing existing vegetation on a site with desired vegetation. (Vegetation Management, Geology and Soils, Wildland Fire) Riparian – Terrestrial environments adjacent to lakes, streams, springs and estuaries where transported surface and subsurface fresh water pro- vides soil moisture for vegetation. (Wildlife Management, Water Re- sources, Geology and Soils, Forest Management, Habitat Connectivity) Significance – A measure of the importance of an archaeological or his- torical resource. The threshold of significance determines eligibility for state and national registers and whether a cultural resource must be con- sidered in NEPA and CEQA documents related to a project. The criteria detailed in CEQA by which significance (See Appendix A) is determined differ for historic and archaeological resources but include the resource’s age, integrity, association with important individuals or trends in local his- tory, and potential to provide important information about the past. (Cul- tural Resources) Snag – A standing dead or partially dead tree, important wildlife habitat for woodpeckers and other cavity nesting birds, and small mammals. (Wildlife Management, Forest Management) Soil – Natural material that covers much of the earth’s surface; consisting of rock and mineral particles often mixed with organic matter. (Vegetation ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES G LOSSARY 103 Management, Wildlife Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Grazing Management, Forest Management, Habitat Connec- tivity, Wildland Fire) Special Status – Species that are state or federally listed as threatened, rare, endangered, species of special concern, candidate species or those plant species listed by the California Native Plant Society. (Vegetation Management, Wildlife Management, Water Resources, Forest Manage- ment, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Stand – An aggregation of trees occupying a specific area, similar in age, size, arrangement and composition, that is distinguishable from the forest in adjoining areas. (Forest Management) Target Pests – Plant or animal species that have a negative impact on other organisms or the surrounding environment and are targeted for treat- ment. (Integrated Pest Management) Ungulate Animals – Hoofed mammals, including ruminants, such as cat- tle, goats, and sheep, as well as horses, and donkeys. (Grazing Manage- ment) Vector – An organism, such as a tick or mosquito, that is able to transport and transmit a pathogen to a host. (Integrated Pest Management) Vegetation Management – The maintenance, establishment, or restora- tion of target vegetation that meets a preserve's management objectives. (Vegetation Management, Grazing Management, Wildland Fire) Watercourse – A natural or artificial channel through which water flows. (Water Resources, Geology and Soils, Habitat Connectivity) Waters – Areas of standing water, seasonal and permanent, such as lakes and ponds, as well as underground aquifers. (Water Resources) Water Quality – The chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of water. Important issues related to forest management include water tem- perature, nutrients, and sediment inputs. (Wildlife Management, Water Resources, Grazing Management, Forest Management, Wildland Fire) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 104 Watershed – A bounded hydrologic system, where all of the precipitation that falls drains into a single water feature, often a creek or stream . (Veg- etation Management, Water Resources, Habitat Connectivity) Wetlands – Areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under nor- mal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted to life in saturated soil conditions (hydrophytes). (Wildlife Man- agement, Integrated Pest Management, Geology and Soils, Grazing Man- agement, Ecological Succession, Habitat Connectivity) Wildland – Land in a natural uncultivated state that forms habitat for plants and wildlife. (Vegetation Management, Integrated Pest Management, Wa- ter Resources, Grazing Management, Wildland Fire) Wildland-Urban Interface – The area where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland. (Wildland Fire) Wildlife – A broad term that includes all living animals that have not been domesticated. (Vegetation Management, Integrated Pest Management, Water Resources, Scenic and Aesthetic, Research and Collection, Graz- ing Management, Forest Management, Habitat Connectivity, Wildland Fire) Wildlife Corridors – Avenues along which wide-ranging animals can travel, plants can propagate, genetic interchange can occur, populations can move in response to environmental changes and natural disasters, and threatened species can be replenished from other areas. (Habitat Connectivity) Woodland – A scattering of trees across a landscape intermixed with a significant component of another vegetation community, such as grass or shrub land. (Vegetation Management, Forest Management, Habitat Con- nectivity, Wildland Fire) ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES GLOSSARY 105 XVIII. REFERENCES California Department of Fish and Game California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/t_e_spp/index.html Dramstad, W.E., Olson, J.D, and Forman, R.T.T. Landscape Ecology Prin- ciples in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning. Harvard Univer- sity Graduate School of Design, Island Press, and the American Society of Landscape Architects, 1996 (Habitat Connectivity) Gonzalez, P. Climate Change in the National Parks of the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. National Park Service and University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley, 2016 (Climate Change) Jensen, D.B., Torn, M.S., and Harte, J. In Our Own Hands: A Strategy for Conserving California’s Biodiversity. University of California Press, 1993 (Habitat Connectivity) Natural Resources Database (NRDB) http://www.nrdb.org/about.asp Peck, S. Planning For Biodiversity: Issues and Examples. Island Press, 1998 (Habitat Connectivity) Townsend, C.R., Harper, J.L., and Begon, M. Essentials of Ecology. Blackwell Science, 2000 (Habitat Connectivity) UNESCO, Tbilisi Declaration, 1978 (Cultural Resources) ATTACHMENT 1 106 APPENDIX A. CEQA CRITERIA This appendix outlines the CEQA Criteria of Significance for Historic Re- sources and Archaeological Resources: HISTORICAL RESOURCES A historical resource may be considered significant under CEQA if it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Reg- ister for Historical Resources (CRHR), or a local register (e.g., a town or county register), if it is determined to be eligible for the CRHR by a quali- fied expert, or if a Lead Agency finds it to be historically significant based on substantial evidence. A resource is considered eligible for listing on the CRHR if it meets one of the following criteria: ♦ Criterion 1: Associated with events that have made a significant con- tribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. ♦ Criterion 2: Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history. ♦ Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic value. ♦ Criterion 4: Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information im- portant to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES In addition to the definition of historical resources above (which can in- clude archaeological sites), the following criteria for unique archaeological resources (California Public Resources Code 21083.2) determine signifi- cance under CEQA: ATTACHMENT 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOURCE MANA GEMENT POLICY DOCUMENT APPENDIX A. CEQA CRITERIA 107 A resource is considered a unique archaeological resource if it meets one of the following criteria: ♦ Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that infor- mation. ♦ Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. ♦ Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehis- toric or historic event or person. ATTACHMENT 1 April 1, 2020 Mr. Eric Sklar, President California Fish and Game Commission 1416 Ninth Street, Suite1320 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Letter of Support for Evaluating the Listing of the Mountain Lion Under the California Endangered Species Act Dear President Sklar and Commissioners: The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (Midpen) would like to take this opportunity to offer the following comments in reference to the proposed listing of mountain lions (Puma concolor) as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CBD & MLF, 2019). Midpen manages roughly 65,000 acres of prime mountain lion habitat in the Santa Cruz Mountains and is committed to protecting regional mountain lion populations by preserving habitat, increasing habitat connectivity, minimizing human-wildlife conflicts, promoting bans and restrictions on rodenticide use and supporting research that improves our understanding of lion populations, ecology, and behavior throughout our region of influence. As detailed in the petition to list, the Santa Cruz Mountain (SCM) lion population shares many of the same issues as the Santa Ana Mountains (SAM), San Gabriel/San Bernardino Mountains (SGSB) and Santa Monica (SMM) populations. All of these populations suffer from reduced habitat connectivity, poor genetic diversity and small effective population sizes (Gustafson et al. 2018). For these reasons Midpen supports the decision to evaluate the SCM population for inclusion in the proposed Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU). Conversely, there are significant differences between these populations that should be considered when evaluating the SCM population for listing. Unlike the SAM, SGSB, and SMM, the SCM have high quality habitat with a surplus lion population that act as a source for neighboring populations (Dellinger et al. 2019). Seven dispersal aged males from the SCM found their way into urban areas between 2014 and 2017 and required relocation by CDFW (CDFW data) indicating that available lion habitat is already occupied by dominant males. The Florida Panther Recovery plan suggests minimum densities of 2-5 lions per 100 square miles (USFWS, 2008). There are 1,387 square miles in the Santa Cruz Mountains bioregion. Based on the conservative estimate of 33-66 adult mountain lions (Gustafson et al. 2018) the SCM reaches the recommended minimum density with 2.38-4.76 lions per square mile. Considering that sub-adults, juveniles, and cubs are not included in this estimate it is likely that lion densities are considerably higher in the SCM. This indicates that the SCM population is not suffering from low population numbers relative to available habitat, but rather a lack of genetic diversity within the population, limited habitat connectivity between neighboring populations, and ATTACHMENT 2 increasing human use within available habitat. If lions in the SCM are listed, the recovery criteria should be designed to reflect this distinction by including a threshold of minimum genetic diversity and improved connectivity for recovery. Furthermore, robust, multi-year population studies will be required to determine the effectiveness of additional protections for mountain lions. As a public land management agency Midpen strives to minimize potential human-wildlife conflicts to the greatest extent possible. Many of our preserves offer high quality lion habitat that directly abut densely populated urban areas with considerable potential for interactions between humans and mountain lions. Midpen has a strong focus on public outreach and education through interpretive signage, on site tabling, interviews with persons reporting lion activity, and adaptive management of trail access in response to potential human safety issues. Unfortunately, two of the seventeen verified mountain lion- human attacks in California since 1986 have occurred on Midpen preserves. The most recent attack took place on February 16th, 2020 at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve (Rancho). At this preserve, lion sightings are reported roughly once per month and lions have been seen at all times of the day throughout all months of the year. As both lion and human populations in the area increase, and human- lion interactions become more common, lions occupying habitat along the urban interface may become more likely to exhibit bold behavior around people. Mountain lion attacks, though rare, are a risk to human safety that cannot be ignored. Furthermore, when attacks do occur, lions are killed in response to protect human safety. Midpen believes that non-lethal behavioral modification research to keep lions wary of human activity would be a benefit to mountain lions and to public safety. Midpen is also interested in studying human recreational use and/or habitat modification to reduce conflict. In addition to research needs for non-lethal behavioral modifications of mountain lions to increase public safety where there is high human/mountain lion interactions, there is also a need for research on non- lethal deterrence methods to reduce livestock predation by mountain lions. In the last 10 years, 42 mountain lions have been lethally removed using depredation permits in Santa Cruz, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz counties (CDFW depredation permit data). These three counties encompass the Santa Cruz Mountains and are all within Midpen’s jurisdiction. This is significant considering the best available estimate of the number of lions in the Santa Cruz Mountains is 33-66 adult lions (Gustafson et al. 2018). In addition to legal depredation of lions, instances of poaching are known to occur along the San Mateo County Coast. In supporting additional protections for mountain lions, non-lethal tools will become increasingly important as livestock operators look for viable alternatives to reduce conflicts. In support of ongoing wildlife and livestock protection policy work, Midpen hired Wildlife Conflict Specialist Dr. Veronica Yovovich to complete a comprehensive literature review detailing all available wildlife livestock conflict mitigation measures that have been evaluated through scientific research. This has been attached to this letter as a reference that may prove useful in determining appropriate non-lethal alternatives for livestock operators dealing with predation issues. Midpen has worked closely with regional CDFW biologists and wardens in responding to both public safety issues and depredation caused by mountain lions. In this capacity we have learned that a key issue facing CDFW is their capacity to respond with existing staffing levels. If the recent decision to extend the “three-strikes” depredation permit process to cover the entire proposed ESU is to be successful, Midpen recommends that additional staff be hired to ensure that CDFW has capacity to issue and monitor these non-lethal permits, as well as to educate ranchers and the public on how to best protect their domestic animals. In addition, there needs to be more enforcement of existing protections for mountain lions to ensure that poaching is discouraged to the greatest extent possible. This may require coordinating with ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 2 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 1 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 I. Purpose To ensure appropriate response to wildlife interactions on District lands that might impact the safety of visitors, staff, pets or the operations of a District preserve. This protocol shall be followed when wildlife such as mountain lions, coyotes, bobcats, raccoons, wild pigs, turkeys, venomous snakes or others display nuisance or aggressive behavior that could endanger the safety of the public or staff. II. Policy Multiple agencies have shared roles and responsibilities in addressing wildlife-human interactions and response on District lands. Staff is responsible to know their responsibilities as well as those of other agencies. Cooperation is essential to fully meet these responsibilities. See Resource Management Roles and Responsibilities Section for additional details. III. Procedure A. Visitor and Field Services staff shall work with Natural Resources staff to determine acceptable and unacceptable wildlife behavior to initiate an appropriate response. Wildlife behavior relevant to humans or their pets can be categorized as acceptable or unacceptable. Acceptable behavior can be defined as any wildlife-human interaction where there is no unprovoked aggression from the animal toward the human or their pet. Unacceptable behavior is where an animal displays unprovoked aggression, repetitive nuisance acts, or unacceptable levels of injuries to humans or damage to other resources. 1. Examples of acceptable wildlife behavior include: The animal does not appear to notice human(s) or pet(s) The animal retreats at the sight of human(s) or pet(s) The animal postures in response to human and/or pet activity followed by retreating or no further aggression The animal remains in place, while humans show no aggression. Animal may be engaged in other acceptable activity such as hunting, feeding, etc. The animal shows signs of curiosity while humans and/or their pet show no aggression 2. Examples of unacceptable wildlife behavior include: The animal displays unprovoked aggression The animal remains in high use area for extended period and fails to retreat when humans are present The animal exhibits predatory behavior towards humans or pets The animal continues to disturb, raid, or investigate humans, pets or high use areas The animal displays a lack of fear of humans and/or pets by aggressively approaching, or failing to retreat, when humans take aggressive actions The animal attacks a human or pet Invasive animals impacting native wildlife or sensitive habitat Not every wildlife interaction will easily fit into one of the two behavior patterns listed above and will have to be judged on the circumstances of that interaction. Investigating staff should look at each wildlife-human and/or pet interaction for signs that an animal was present and ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 2 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 posed a threat or displayed little fear of, or an unusual interest in, humans and/or their pets. Cumulative interactions or context will also be considered. For example: several acceptable interactions may occur, however their frequency or amount may cause interactions with that animal or interactions in a particular area to become unacceptable. 3. In some instances, humans may unintentionally provoke unacceptable behavior on the part of the animal by: Immediately running away on sighting (especially children), triggering the chase instinct Remaining in a location that does not allow the animal an escape route Approaching an animal that is hunting, feeding, or is with their young By bringing pets such as leashed dogs into proximity with wildlife Not looking where they are placing their hands and feet in areas where snakes or other wildlife may occur Aggressive actions on the part of humans that would tend to cause an animal to retreat would include: Grouping together Making loud noises, yelling, blowing a whistle, or playing loud music Throwing objects like stones Moving toward the animal with a walking stick, bicycle or other large object B. For wildlife interactions with invasive animals, see also Integrated Pest Management section XX.005. For sick, injured, diseased, dying or dead wildlife (such as deer carcasses, downed bats or animals that may require euthanasia), please see section XX.007. If wildlife has an interaction with domestic animals (pets), see also the domestic animal control section XX.008. For wildlife livestock interactions, please see the grazing management section XX.010. C. Management Actions in response to wildlife interactions: The District's management actions focus on: 1) maintaining and enhancing natural communities in which wildlife populations live; 2) providing public information and education about wildlife behavior and habitats; 3) providing medical response to Preserve users when a wildlife-human interaction results in injury; and 4) investigating and reporting wildlife-human (including pet) interactions that occur Standard approaches for public safety, information dissemination, and response to wildlife- human and/or pet interactions are described below and the appropriate color-coded mountain response signage is noted as well. See Section XX.009. Wildlife interactions fall into five categories escalating from least concern to most concern: 1) Sighting, 2) Recurrent sightings, 3) Encounter, 4) Incident, 5) Attack. 1. Sighting: A visual observation of an animal (Yellow Signage) Since many preserves contain good quality wildlife habitat, a sighting is not normally a cause for management action. Exceptions to this would be instances where the animal appears to be sick or injured, is invasive, is sighted frequently in close proximity to high use area or displays some abnormal behavior or condition. Staff investigates to assess the accuracy of the report Staff completes an Electronic Wildlife Observation Form as soon as possible If there is a public safety concern, staff notifies the Visitor Services Manager ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 3 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 and Natural Resources Manager or their assigned designee Confirmed mountain lion and coyote predation events (animal carcass present or observed predation) shall always be reported using the Electronic Wildlife Observation Form If a carcass or portions of a carcass need to be relocated, see the Sick, Injured, Diseased, Dying or Dead section XX.007 prior to moving the carcass Staff investigates and reports invasive wildlife (pests) and considers control options using the District’s Integrated Pest Management Program (see Section XX.005). Invasive animals not covered by the District’s California Department of Fish and Wildlife Program shall be handled on a case-by-case basis as determined by Natural Resources staff in consultation with applicable agencies 2. Recurring sighting: Repeated sightings of an animal in an area. (Yellow Signage) Staff investigates report. If possible, obtain animal description detailed enough to ascertain the identity of specific animals (size, markings, split ear, limp, etc.) Staff documents sightings on Electronic Wildlife Observation Form. Form shall be completed as soon as possible after report is received Natural Resources staff reviews other reports in order to determine any use patterns, unusual circumstances or repeated sightings that may not have been known or documented from independent sightings alone Staff considers temporary trail closures if a den, kill site or another ongoing attractant is suspected or confirmed Confirmed mountain lion and coyote predation events (animal carcass present or observed predation) shall always be reported using the Electronic Wildlife Observation Form If a carcass or portions of a carcass need to be relocated, see the Sick, Injured, Diseased, Dying or Dead section XX.007 prior to moving the carcass Recurrent sightings that are problematic or potentially dangerous will be reported to California Department of Fish and Wildlife Natural Resources staff informs California Department of Fish and Wildlife of recurrent sightings that may pose a public safety concern. Notification to California Department of Fish and Wildlife is species dependent, for example recurrent mountain lion sightings would be notified, but recurrent rattlesnake sightings would not. Comprehensive data for all mountain lion observations is sent to California Department of Fish and Wildlife on a quarterly to annual basis by Natural Resources based on staff availability Staff may consider if marking the animal is possible, especially to determine if a recurrent sighting is more than one animal and/or to attempt to deter unacceptable behavior (such as repeated presence in a high use area) To the level of their training and allowable permit conditions, Visitor Services and Natural Resources staff may mark the animal using the appropriate personal protective equipment, tools, and following safety protocols Staff researches the possibility of making structural changes such as removal ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 4 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 of brush, changing a trail location, or modifying/removing potential attractants As warranted Visitor and Field Services staff will provide educational material about recurrent wildlife to the public. Visitor Services staff may post signage, distribute materials or staff outreach events Natural Resources staff works with Visitor Services and Public Affairs staff to develop appropriate content and messaging If warranted, Public Affairs staff will provide outreach using the District website, newsletter or other articles, social media, or by scheduling or attending outreach events Mountain lion or other recurrent wildlife sightings with unacceptable wildlife behavior at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve require notification by Visitor Services to Santa Clara County Parks, Hidden Villa, and neighborhood associations For all other Preserves, Visitor Services in conjunction with Public Affairs shall notify applicable neighbors, tenants, local jurisdictions, and agencies as deemed necessary 3. Encounter: An unexpected direct meeting between a human and wildlife without incident. The animal may display acceptable or unacceptable behavior. (Orange signage) Staff investigates report. If possible, obtain animal description detailed enough to ascertain the identity of specific animals (size, markings, split ear, limp, etc.) Staff completes an Electronic Wildlife Observation Form Staff may call Natural Resources wildlife staff if more immediate review is requested Natural Resources staff will determine if animal behavior is acceptable or unacceptable from witness statements and investigation of the scene, with attention to if the animal demonstrated a lack of fear towards humans or pets. Special attention should be paid to the description of the animal and its behavior toward people or pets especially the following: Who initiated the encounter, wildlife, humans or pets? Was the animal feeding, with young, or appear to be cornered? What attempts were made to scare off the animal? What attempts were made to lure or feed the animal? Did the animal follow, chase, stalk, growl or hiss at the person or their pet? What was the appearance of the animal (aggressive posture, ears pinned, crouching, sniffing ground)? Typical acceptable and unacceptable behaviors are described in Section A. above Natural Resources staff reviews other reports in order to determine any noticeable patterns or increasing wildlife behavior indicating public safety concerns As warranted notification up the Visitor Services chain of command should happen next followed by notification of any staff that may work in the affected ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 5 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 area including all field staff Area Superintendents or the Visitor Services Manager will notify necessary department managers and the general manager’s office as necessary Visitor Services and Natural Resources staff consider temporary trail closures if a den, kill site or another ongoing attractant is suspected or confirmed Confirmed mountain lion and coyote predation events (animal carcass present or observed predation) shall always be reported using the Electronic Wildlife Observation Form If a carcass or portions of a carcass need to be relocated, see the Sick, Injured, Diseased, Dying or Dead section XX.007 prior to moving the carcass To the level of their training and allowable permit conditions, Visitor Services and Natural Resources staff may consider marking the animal if possible, to determine if more than one animal is present and/or to attempt to deter unacceptable behavior Visitor and field services staff research the possibility of making structural changes such as removal of brush and or food sources, changing a trail location, or modifying/removing other potential attractant(s) Natural Resources Department staff will notify California Department of Fish and Wildlife of mountain lion or other aggressive animal encounters. Visitor Services supervisory staff may notify California Department of Fish and Wildlife if Natural Resources staff are unavailable and notification is immediately warranted Visitor Services Staff posts “Area Closed” signs for a confirmed encounter with animal displaying unacceptable behavior that poses a potential future public safety risk Caution signs will be posted following an Area Closure for a length of time to be determined by the Area Superintendent and the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee Signs shall be posted at all designated exterior access points to any preserve within a reasonable distance of the encounter or at designated trail locations when a portion of the preserve is closed. This may result in posting signs at multiple Preserves and/or contacting adjacent landowners for additional posting considerations The Area Closed Signs will be replaced by “Caution” signs for a period of two (2) weeks from the date the area was closed or as deemed safe by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (if applicable) and/or Natural Resources staff If a portion of the preserve is closed, Caution signs should be posted at all the designated entrances to that preserve which are not posted closed. For more guidance on placement of signage, see Mountain Lion Posting Guidelines Section. Mountain lion or other wildlife-human encounters with unacceptable wildlife behavior at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve require notification by Visitor Services to Santa Clara County Parks, Hidden Villa, and neighborhood associations. For all other Preserves, Visitor Services in conjunction with Public Affairs shall notify applicable neighbors, tenants, local jurisdictions, and agencies as ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 6 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 deemed necessary. Area superintendent in conjunction with Natural Resources to determine if an after-action review shall be conducted with all District departments involved in response to the encounter (case-by-case). 4. Incident: An incident is defined as an event which meets one or more of the following criteria: A conflict between human or their domestic animal (pets) and a wild animal that resulted in an unsafe situation; The animal displayed unacceptable/abnormal behavior; and the person involved felt threatened It is also considered an incident whenever domestic animals (pets) are attacked Staff response to an incident: Staff determines, from witness statements and investigation of the scene, if the wildlife involved in the incident demonstrated a lack of fear towards humans, special attention should be paid to the description of the animal and its behavior toward people, especially the following: Who initiated the encounter, wildlife, humans, or domestic animals? Was the wildlife involved in the incident feeding, with young, or appear to be cornered? What attempts were made to scare off the animal? What attempts were made to lure the animal or feed? Did the animal follow, chase, stalk, growl, hiss, strike or lunge at the person? What was the appearance of the animal (aggressive posture, ears pinned, crouching, sniffing ground)? Staff notifies Area Superintendent and the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee as soon as possible. Visitor Services staff may close the entire preserve or a portion of the preserve where the incident occurred to protect public safety. Follow the closure protocols in section D Other factors to be considered at an incident: It may be necessary to close and secure the area of the incident and treat it as a crime scene. This may be necessary to enhance the chances for tracking and trapping personnel to locate the offending animal (see closure protocol) Visitor and Field Services staff may need to notify and work with California Department of Fish and Wildlife to implement protocol for incidents and attacks and to strategize for specific response. Pre- planning is critical since successful tracking (if warranted) is dependent on a timely response If the animal has exhibited unprovoked aggression towards a human and is a threat to public safety, California Department of Fish and Wildlife may consider removing the animal. If the animal is destroyed, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife lab will require that the animal be tested and treated in the same manner as evidence Time is critical. The best chance of successfully tracking the animal comes when qualified wildlife tracking personnel can be on scene ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 7 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 within a couple hours of the incident Wildlife incidents at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve require notification by Visitor Services to Santa Clara County Parks, Hidden Villa, and neighborhood associations For all other Preserves, Visitor Services in conjunction with Public Affairs shall notify applicable neighbors, tenants, local jurisdictions, and agencies Determine public education and media needs. Public Affairs staff will update the District website and Visitor Services staff will distribute materials developed in conjunction with Natural Resources staff Complete an Electronic Wildlife Observation Form as soon as possible after the incident and no later than 24 hours A press release may be prepared by the District Public Information Officer. Press releases will be determined on a case by case basis at the discretion of management staff and the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee Visitor Services staff posts a Caution Sign on all designated exterior access points to the preserve where the incident occurred for a period of two (2) weeks from the date the incident occurred Area superintendent to conduct an after-action review with all District departments involved in response to the incident. 5. Attack: An “Attack” is defined as an Incident where a human is injured or killed by a wild animal Procedures to follow when notified of an Attack: Attend to the medical needs of the victim(s) It is imperative that the victim(s) be evaluated and treated by medical personnel The bite area must be preserved to collect any animal fluid samples For mountain lion or coyote attack, a Visitor Services Supervisor shall contact a California Department of Fish and Wildlife Warden through Mountain View Communications or their 24-hr. dispatch immediately (916) 358-1300. California Department of Fish and Wildlife will assist in determining, from the above information, how to deal with the animal. If necessary, California Department of Fish and Wildlife will contact personnel for tracking or direct District staff to do so For mountain lion and coyote attacks, immediately close and secure the areas of the attack and treat it as a crime scene. Consider if this is warranted for any other wildlife attacks on a case by case basis (for example may not be warranted for a snake bite but may be needed for other attacks). This is necessary to enhance the chances for tracking and trapping personnel to locate the offending animal (see Section D: Closure Protocol) Informational signs indicating Closed Areas should be posted at all designated exterior access points and parking lots at the Preserve in which the attack occurred If the attack occurred near a preserve boundary, a Visitor Services Supervisor in conjunction with Natural Resources staff will consider closing or posting caution signs in neighboring preserves Signs should be posted on barricades, existing signposts, and gates. ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 8 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 Signs must be visible to users and should act as a barrier to Closed Areas of the Preserve. Caution tape may be used in addition to posted signs to close off trail entrances and gate ways “Area Closed” signs will be posted until Area Superintendent and/or the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee deems the areas safe to the public. Caution signs will be posted following an Area Closure for a length of time to be determined by the Area Superintendent and the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee For mountain lion, coyote, and other applicable attacks: make sure the enforcement agency on scene is aware that an effective search for the wildlife will most likely be conducted by CDFW and authorized trappers. Treat the area as a crime scene even if the offending wildlife is destroyed Time is critical. The best chance of successfully tracking an animal comes when qualified personnel can be on scene within a couple hours of the attack Document the circumstances of the attack by completing the Electronic Wildlife Observation Form and Ranger Incident Report, paying special attention to the exact location, description, and direction of travel of the animal. Staff should also note the following: What was the victim’s interaction with the animal prior to the attack? Did the victim run prior to the attack? Did the victim or others injure the animal in fending off the attack? A follow-up supplemental form can be sent when the animal is located or further tracking discontinued Attempt to determine from the information if the animal’s behavior was defensive in nature, or an attempt to prey on a person Mountain lion, coyote or other applicable wildlife attacks at Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve require notification by Visitor Services to Santa Clara County Parks, Hidden Villa, and neighborhood associations For all other Preserves, Visitor Services in conjunction with Public Affairs shall notify applicable neighbors, tenants, local jurisdictions, and agencies Provide visitor information in area of attack. Public Affairs staff will update the District website and Visitor Services staff will distribute materials developed in conjunction with Natural Resources staff All questions regarding the attack should be referred to the District’s Visitor Services Manager or their designee and California Department of Fish and Wildlife until a public statement is made Public Information Officer designated by the Visitor Services Manager or Area Superintendent will handle questions regarding the preserve closure A press release prepared by either the District Public Information Officer or California Department of Fish and Wildlife is required if an attack by a mountain lion, coyote, or other applicable animal occurs Area superintendent to conduct an after-action review with all District departments involved in response to the attack. D. Electronic Wildlife Observation Form: 1. Authentic mountain lion encounters, incidents, attacks or other wildlife-human interactions shall be reported to the on-duty supervisor, Area Superintendent, and the ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 9 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee. All observations shall also be recorded on the Electronic Wildlife Observation Form and Ranger Incident Report which shall be completed (when needed) by end of shift. Only confirmed mountain lion sightings and applicable wildlife incidents or attacks should be reported to California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All Electronic Wildlife Observation Forms should be completed within 24 hours of sighting, recurrent sighting, encounter, incident, or attack E. Closure Protocol: 1. A preserve, or a portion thereof, should be closed whenever necessary for public safety, for investigation purposes, or for tracking offending animal(s). Visitor Services staff may immediately close an area for public safety purposes. As soon as possible, the Area Superintendent should approve a closure and indicate the scope of the closure. 2. When any trail, portion of or an entire preserve(s) is closed, the Supervising Ranger shall immediately contact the Area Superintendent and the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee and inform them of the circumstances. The Area Superintendent shall notify the Visitor Services Manager who will notify the Visitor and Field Services Assistant General Manager and General Manager of the situation. Area Superintendent or Supervising Ranger may put the Visitor Services Manager in direct contact with the ranger(s) on scene to relay clear, precise information If an Area Superintendent cannot be reached, the Supervising Ranger shall contact the Visitor Services Manager to inform of the closure If the Visitor Services Manager cannot be reached, the Area Superintendent will contact the Assistant General Manager and General Manager to update them on the closure For any closure the Visitor Services Manager, Natural Resources Manager, and General Manager will be notified of the incident as soon as possible See also Emergency Notification Section 5.028 of the Ranger Operations Manual 3. The duration and scope of the closure will depend on the circumstances of each situation. Consultations should be made with knowledgeable professionals such as wildlife biologists, California Department of Fish and Wildlife staff, authorized trackers, etc. The closure may need to be adjusted as more information becomes available. Consideration should also be given to the following specific factors: The proximity of other use areas to the site of the wildlife-human interaction and whether these areas consist of suitable habitat (i.e. vegetation that provides cover) or wildlife corridors linking habitat blocks The probability of an incident or attack. Natural Resources staff shall review the circumstances of the wildlife-human interaction and the history of animal activity in the area Whether there are indications of a sick, injured, or diseased animal being involved Whether the animal’s behavior was predatory, defensive, or curious in nature The animal’s direction of travel and elapsed time since the interaction. Whether the circumstances of the wildlife-human interaction have any similarity with other interactions that would indicate the presence of an ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 10 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 animal that is prone to aggressive behavior or does not fear humans Visitor Services in conjunction with Public Affairs shall notify applicable neighbors, tenants, local jurisdictions, and agencies as deemed necessary. If a portion of a preserve is to be closed to the public for an extended period, a press release should be issued to local news sources. Visitor Services staff shall notify the law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the area of the closure 4. Preserve closures should remain in effect until the area is deemed safe by Natural Resources staff or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (as applicable) and Visitor Services Supervisory staff. Upon re-opening a closed area, Caution signs should be posted for two weeks. If additional wildlife-human interaction(s) with unacceptable behavior occur, or if the offending animal is still in the area, Caution signs will remain posted for two weeks from the most recent. F. Duration of Closures Following an Attack: 1. Areas should normally be reopened when California Department of Fish and Wildlife, trappers, or others as applicable have completed (successfully or unsuccessfully) their operations, and there is no indication that the offending animal is still in the area. Closures for longer periods of time may be appropriate if there are indications that the offending animal is still in the area (i.e., fresh sign) or is likely to return soon (i.e., cached food). Before reopening an area, consult with Natural Resources or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (as applicable) and the Visitor Services Manager. Be sure visitor information (signs and brochures) are in place when facility is reopened. 2. If a portion of the preserve is to be closed to the public for an extended period, the Public Affairs department will work with the Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (as applicable) to issue a press release to local news sources. 3. Closures shall be enforced with citations if necessary, to ensure compliance. G. Public Education during Preserve Closures: 1. When a closure has been necessary due to a wildlife interaction, District staff should make every effort to inform the public about the value and fragile nature of wildlife and their habitat within the preserves. What people can do to avoid a potentially dangerous interaction with wildlife should be given special attention. General information (such as signs and pamphlets) on the specific animals should be made available in affected areas. 2. If a Preserve or trail was closed and reopened without locating the offending animal, visitors should be informed of the situation and of what to do if they encounter wildlife. Use any closure as an additional opportunity to expand the District’s efforts to educate the public about living with wild animals. H. Media Relations about Wildlife Interactions: 1. All media inquiries regarding responses to specific wildlife interactions shall generally be referred to the Public Affairs Manager, or the designated Public Information Officer. Since California Department of Fish and Wildlife has statutory responsibility for wildlife in the state, media inquiries regarding the specific wildlife interaction may be referred to California Department of Fish and Wildlife staff (if applicable). For “incidents” or “attack,” California Department of Fish and Wildlife may assist the District in disseminating appropriate information. 2. District staff may respond to inquiries regarding frequency and locations of sightings, ATTACHMENT 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ranger Operations Manual Resource Management Policy 12.006 Page 11 of 11 Title: Wildlife Response Protocols 6/30/2020 District protocols for wildlife interactions, public warnings, preserve closures and other types of general information related to District operations. 3. The media is an important partner to be utilized in the on-going education of the community regarding the possible presence of dangerous wild animals, and threatening wildlife behavior. 4. Incident information will be posted on the District website if a preserve is closed due to wildlife activity. Incident information may be posted on the District website when caution signs are posted based on the discretion of the Area Superintendent and Natural Resources Manager or assigned designee. ATTACHMENT 3 June 24, 2020 Board Meeting 20-13 SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Wednesday, June 24, 2020 The Board of Directors conducted this meeting in accordance with California Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20. All Board members and staff participated via teleconference. DRAFT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING Vice-President Riffle called the special meeting of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Jed Cyr, Larry Hassett, Karen Holman, Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Yoriko Kishimoto, Curt Riffle, and Pete Siemens Members Absent: None Staff Present: General Manager Ana Ruiz, General Counsel Hilary Stevenson, Assistant General Manager Susanna Chan, Chief Financial Officer/Director of Administrative Services Stefan Jaskulak, District Clerk/Assistant to the General Manager Jennifer Woodworth, Public Affairs Manager Korrine Skinner District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported no written comments were submitted for this item. 1. Benchmark Survey Results (R-20-62) Public Affairs Manager Korrine Skinner provided the staff presentation describing the purpose of the benchmark survey to support the Board’s strategic plan goals and to inform the creation of a District-wide strategic communications plan. Ms. Skinner introduced Miranda Everitt from FM3 Research who was the District’s consultant for the project. Ms. Everitt presented the results of the benchmark survey conducted in January 2020, describing the methodology used and compared District survey results to surveys completed by other open space and parks agencies. The survey looked at residents’ opinions on issues affecting District residents, value of open space lands, District mission and values, effectiveness of District messaging, etc. Meeting 20-13 Page 2 The Board requested and received clarification regarding the benchmark survey results. President Holman inquired regarding the reasons why residents surveyed under 40 have less familiarity with the District. Ms. Everitt stated this could be for a variety of factors, such as new to the area, less awareness of local open space options, busier schedules, etc. Director Kishimoto inquired regarding the information sources used by residents and suggested additional information could be gathered regarding specific sources of news and information. Ms. Skinner reported the District will repeat the study periodically and could craft a more specific question for a future study. Director Kersteen-Tucker commented on the size of the sampling area in the Coastside Protection Area stating that a large number were from Redwood City, which is not in the Coastside Protection Area. Ms. Skinner stated that the areas were identified by zip code, and staff will look into this more. Director Kersteen-Tucker spoke regarding the importance of protecting local food sources as a potential District message related to protecting agricultural lands. Vice-President Riffle inquired regarding the potential effect of the shelter-in-place on the survey results. Ms. Skinner stated that she thinks resident awareness levels are expected to have risen as visitor usage rose during the shelter-in-place. Vice-President Riffle inquired regarding differing opinions for residents along the coastal area versus those closer to the Bay. Ms. Skinner described some of the small differences between residents on either side of the District and stated that the results were enlightening compared with preconceived ideas of what the results would be. Ms. Skinner reviewed the implications of the survey results for District communications, including increasing awareness, consider target audience opportunities, elevating key messaging themes, and matching the message to the audience. Strategies include better utilizing the Open Space Views newsletter, expanding media and social media outreach, expand community presentations and tabling, embracing the District’s low-impact identity, etc. Public comments opened at 6:37 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported no public comments were submitted for this item. Public hearing closed at 6:37 p.m. Meeting 20-13 Page 3 Director Siemens suggested a smaller scope survey should be completed in the next year to measure increase in awareness following the COVID-19 outbreak and spoke in favor of creating a newspaper insert for local papers. Director Kersteen-Ticker expressed interested in further studying the differences between coastside and bayside residents to help develop focused messages for the coastal areas. Director Kersteen-Tucker expressed interest in learning more about where residents visit open space, such on District, state, or county lands. Director Kishimoto spoke regarding the District’s upcoming 50th anniversary and what may be next for the District in the coming 50 years. Director Hassett spoke in favor of partnering with health organizations to promote family health on District preserves. General Manager Ana Ruiz commented on the value of the information to help the District better connect with its residents and also in creating new tools that can provide more focused information that is important and meaningful to residents. No Board action required. Vice-President Riffle adjourned the special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at 6:56 p.m. REGULAR MEETING Vice-President Riffle called the regular meeting of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Jed Cyr, Larry Hassett, Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Yoriko Kishimoto, Curt Riffle, and Pete Siemens Members Absent: Karen Holman Staff Present: General Manager Ana Ruiz, General Counsel Hilary Stevenson, Chief Financial Officer Stefan Jaskulak, Assistant General Manager Brian Malone, Assistant General Manager Susanna Chan, Controller Mike Foster, District Clerk/Assistant to the General Manager Jennifer Woodworth, Finance Manager Andrew Taylor, Natural Resources Manager Kirk Lenington, Visitor Services Manager Matt Anderson, Planning Manager Jane Mark, Land & Facilities Manager Michael Jurich, Engineering & Construction Manager Jay Lin, Information Systems & Technology Manager Casey Hiatt, Public Affairs Manager Kori Skinner, Real Property Manager Mike Williams, Governmental Affairs Specialist Joh Hugg Meeting 20-13 Page 4 Vice-President Riffle announced this meeting is being held in accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order allowing Board members to participate remotely. The District has done its best to conduct a meeting where everyone has an opportunity to listen to the meeting and to provide comment. The public has the opportunity to comment on the agenda, and the opportunity to listen to this meeting through the internet or via telephone. This information can be found on the meeting agenda, which was physically posted at the District’s Administrative Office, and on the District website. Vice-President Riffle described the process and protocols for the meeting. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported no written comments were submitted for this item. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion: Director Kersteen-Tucker moved, and Director Siemens seconded the motion to adopt the agenda. ROLL CALL VOTE: 6-0-0 (President Holman absent) CONSENT CALENDAR Public comment opened at 7:12 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth read the comments submitted for the Consent Calendar into the record. Ross Heitkamp supports the dedication of a commemorative bench for California State Senator Jim Beall and suggested an alternate location for the bench installation. Public comment closed at 7:14 p.m. Director Holman arrived at 7:15 p.m. Motion: Director Cyr moved, and Director Siemens seconded the motion to approve the Consent Calendar. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 1. Approve June 10, 2020 Minutes 2. Claims Report 3. Approval of a Commemorative Bench for State Senator Jim Beall at El Sereno Open Space Preserve (R-20-63) General Manager’s Recommendation: Approve the recommendation from the Legislative, Funding and Public Affairs Committee to install a commemorative bench and plaque in honor of Meeting 20-13 Page 5 significant supporter State Senator Jim Beall with a view over the Lexington Vista at El Sereno Open Space Preserve. Director Siemens spoke regarding the honor it was to nominate Senator Beall for a commemorative bench honoring Senator Beall. Governmental Affairs Specialist Josh Hugg stated staff will work with Senator Beall’s office regarding the specific bench location if the bench is approved by the Board in response to the public comment received. The photograph attached to the staff report is meant to be representative of the area. 4. Partnership with the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District for Invasive Plant Early Detection and Rapid Response (R-20-67) General Manager’s Recommendation: Authorize the General Manager to enter into a three-year agreement with the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District to perform education and outreach activities and limited invasive non-native plant treatment, for a total amount not-to- exceed $210,000 ($70,000 per year). 5. Annual Review of Finance Policies for Fiscal Year 2021 (R-20-64) General Manager’s Recommendations: 1. Affirm Board Policies 3.08 - Statement of Investment, and 3.09 - Debt Management Policy. 2. Approve two minor amendments to Board Policy 3.06 – Initial and Continuing Disclosures Relating to Bond Issuances relating to reporting events of the Continuing Disclosure Policy. 6. Authorization to contribute a $1.5 Million payment of the Fiscal Year 2019-20 budget savings to the Section 115 Trust administered by Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) (R-20-65) General Manager’s Recommendation: Authorize the General Manager to deposit $1.5 Million into the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s PARS account established under a Section 115 Trust to pre-fund pension obligations. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 BOARD BUSINESS 7. Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget and Capital Improvement and Action Plan (R-20-68) Chief Financial Officer and Director of Administrative Services Stefan Jaskulak provided the staff report. Mr. Jaskulak reviewed the changes to the budget book since the public hearing on the budget on June 10, 2020, as requested by the Board of Directors. Mr. Jaskulak reviewed the proposed FY20-21 budget by fund and the resolutions proposed for adoption. Director Riffle requested clarification regarding the e-bike pilot project, including potential study of e-bike use on paved and unpaved trails, which is included as a Visitor Services Department operating project. Meeting 20-13 Page 6 Assistant General Manager Brian Malone reported the intent of the project is to bring an item to the Board in August 2020 regarding e-bike use on paved trails. A potential pilot program for e- bikes on unpaved trails, including potential project initiation and timeline, would also be discussed as a part of the agenda item. Director Kishimoto suggested modifying the project language to state “Explore pilot program for e-bike access on District paved trails and defer the evaluation of a pilot e-bike program on District unpaved trails.” Director Kersteen-Tucker spoke in support of including that further evaluation of e-bike use would be evaluated rather than stating any evaluation is deferred. Additionally, Director Kersteen-Tucker requested additional information regarding the impact of e-bike on District trails. Mr. Malone stated the main impact at District preserves is on the visitor experience rather than on the trails, and staff will be installing additional signage informing visitors regarding the current prohibition of e-bikes on District trails. Director Kersteen-Tucker inquired how long the e-bikes potential pilot program would be deferred. General Manager Ruiz confirmed that further study of a potential pilot project for e-bikes on unpaved trails would be including in the following fiscal year action plan and budget (FY22), which the Board will review and approve as part of the annual Budget and Capital Improvement and Action Plan process. Public comments opened at 7:46 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported no public comments were submitted for this item. Public comments closed at 7:46 p.m. Motion: Director Kishimoto moved and Director Cyr seconded the motion to: 1. Adopt a Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2020-21 (FY21) Budget and Capital Improvement and Action Plan. 2. The Visitor Services Department operating project E-Bike Policy Evaluation will be modified to read “Explore pilot program for e-bike access on District paved trails.” 3. Adopt a Resolution approving the Classification and Compensation Plan for Fiscal Year 2020-21. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM • Updates regarding the administrative historic resources procedural guide, historic resources database, and historic resources training program Meeting 20-13 Page 7 INFORMATIONAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports Director Riffle reported the Board Appointee Evaluation committee met on June 17, 2020 and finalized the evaluation schedule, which has been provided to the Board appointees. B. Staff Reports Ms. Ruiz reported on several upcoming webinars that may be of interest to the Board members. C. Director Reports The Board members submitted their compensatory reports. Director Kersteen-Tucker requested updates regarding the District’s volunteer and docent programs and their ability to return to field work. Ms. Ruiz reported staff is currently assembling a phased plan for reentry into the field, including training, safety protocols, etc. Director Kersteen-Tucker requested and received an update regarding the higher use of District preserves by visitors. President Holman inquired if staff was aware of any concerns related to illegal fireworks being used near District preserves. Mr. Malone reported that visitor use is typically higher near the July Fourth holiday, and additional staff is brought on to enforce fireworks prohibitions. There has not been an issue related to fireworks prohibitions so far at the preserves. Director Riffle suggested the Board conduct a self-evaluation and requested staff report back with information regarding this topic. The Board members spoke in support of conducting a Board self-evaluation. President Holman suggested staff work with the Board President and Vice-President to further develop the self-evaluation process and return to the Board. ADJOURNMENT Vice-President Riffle adjourned the regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 8:12 p.m. ________________________________ Jennifer Woodworth, MMC District Clerk MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT MEETING # 20-14 MEETING DATE: July 08, 2020 Fiscal Year to date EFT:55.87% Fiscal Year 18-19 EFT:29.44% Payment Number Payment Type Payment Date Notes Vendor No. and Name Invoice Description Payment Amount 2143 EFT 06/29/2020 11958 - PARS/Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District FY20 PARS 115 Trust Contribution - Pension 1,500,000.00 81215 Check 06/26/2020 *10845 - City of Mountain View - Finance Dispatch Services - Apr - Jun 2020 57,450.00 2116 EFT 06/26/2020 *12052 - 4984 EL Camino LLC A02/A03/A04 Rent - July 2020 36,678.00 2154 EFT 07/03/2020 11303 - Santa Clara County FireSafe Council Funding Support - Grant Application Development - Cal Fire Forest Health Grant 34,995.00 81232 Check 06/26/2020 11558 - Vida Verde Nature Education Grantmaking Program: Vida Verde Education Center - 1/1/20 - 4/29/20 27,487.05 81238 Check 07/03/2020 11501 - Harris Design BCR Public Access Project - Jan - Apr 2020 26,524.38 2125 EFT 06/26/2020 11593 - H.T. Harvey & Associates Ravenswood Bay Trail - April 2020 24,650.18 2131 EFT 06/26/2020 10227 - Peninsula Open Space Trust South Cowell Appraisal - 1/2 MROSD Share /South Cowell Investigations/Historic Eval.19,812.35 2120 EFT 06/26/2020 *10214 - Delta Dental Dental Benefits - June 2020 17,638.50 2147 EFT 07/03/2020 11859 - Horizon Water and Environment, LLC Programmatic Environmental Permitting thru May 31, 2020 16,933.00 2151 EFT 07/03/2020 10227 - Peninsula Open Space Trust Reimbursement for Phase II Soil Sampling 13,700.00 2142 EFT 06/26/2020 11990 - ZFA Structural Engineers Contingency - Structure Stabilization at Multiple Preserves 11,381.50 2160 EFT 07/03/2020 12050 - Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.Deer Hollow Farm White Barn Structural Stabilization - March 2020 11,115.00 2134 EFT 06/26/2020 12082 - Sicular Environmental Consulting La Honda Forest Management Plan - 4/1/20 - 5/31/20 8,200.00 2128 EFT 06/26/2020 10419 - Lincoln National Life Insurance Co.LTD/AD&D/Life - June 2020 7,655.87 2122 EFT 06/26/2020 10642 - Forensic Analytical Consulting Services, Inc.Fit Testing/Annual Mandatory Cal/OSHA Training 2020 7,450.00 2138 EFT 06/26/2020 11895 - Timmons Group Inc Work Order and Asset Management - Mar - Apr 2020 6,335.00 81234 Check 06/26/2020 11165 - Woodhams Electrical Disconnect Elect. Feed to Burned Structure - Thornewood/Reinstall #4 ACSR Cable - Tree Work 5,586.00 2118 EFT 06/26/2020 11148 - Balance Hydrologics, Inc BCR Gaging Assistant - Bear Creek Preserve 4,686.25 2124 EFT 06/26/2020 10187 - Gardenland Power Equipment Fuel, Helmets, Brushcutter parts, Weed Whip, Hedge Trimmer, Chainsaw Chains 4,294.09 81239 Check 07/03/2020 11770 - Hydroscience Engineers Bear Creek Stables Improvements (Water System Design) - May 2020 4,085.00 81242 Check 07/03/2020 11618 - Trail People Hwy 17 Wildlife Crossing - Final 4/16 - 6/09 3,983.00 2141 EFT 06/26/2020 *11118 - Wex Bank Fuel for District vehicles 3,847.20 2132 EFT 06/26/2020 12031 - Ray & Jan's Mobile Truck Service P125, P115 & P122 Equip Install, 5K Service (8 Patrol Vehicles), Qtr Bit Inspections 3,200.18 81224 Check 06/26/2020 11064 - Rosemary Cameron Consulting services 10/1/2019 - 05/31/2020 3,137.50 2157 EFT 07/03/2020 11895 - Timmons Group Inc Work Order and Asset Management - May 2020 3,005.00 2148 EFT 07/03/2020 10794 - John Northmore Roberts & Associates Bear Creek Stables Improvements - May 2020 2,975.13 2146 EFT 07/03/2020 10187 - Gardenland Power Equipment Chainsaw bar oil, trimmer line, battery powered equip, premixed fuel & gas cans 2,944.66 2156 EFT 07/03/2020 10307 - The Sign Shop Signage - Windy Hill, RW Bay Trail, Std Op, Facility Main. & Custom Vinyl Letters 2,745.88 2130 EFT 06/26/2020 10073 - Normal Data Database Services - May 2020 2,406.25 2126 EFT 06/26/2020 12105 - IBI Group Rancho San Antonio Multimodal Access Study - February 2020 2,355.00 81229 Check 06/26/2020 *11730 - Standard Insurance Company RV Benefit - Basic Supplemental Life - June 2020 2,312.46 2153 EFT 07/03/2020 12031 - Ray & Jan's Mobile Truck Service 5K Service - P123,P117,M208,M210,M214,M225,A102,M223,M216 2,199.27 81222 Check 06/26/2020 11518 - Ranching By Nature Payment for Thistle Mowing Hand-pulling Poison Hemlock 2,112.50 81237 Check 07/03/2020 12015 - Dudek Grant Writing Services - 4/25 - 5/29 2,100.00 2119 EFT 06/26/2020 12109 - Christine Sculati Grants Program Support - May 2020 2,093.75 2145 EFT 07/03/2020 10723 - Callander Associates Ravenswood Bay Trail Construction Project - May 2020 1,879.86 2121 EFT 06/26/2020 10546 - Ecological Concerns, Inc.IPM for Roads and Trails at BCR 1,750.00 81235 Check 07/03/2020 *10428 - ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES Crime Insurance Premium 7/1/2020 - 7/1/2021 1,701.00 81240 Check 07/03/2020 11409 - LA OFERTA Bond Oversight Committee Recruitment Ads - 06/05/2020 1,644.00 2144 EFT 07/03/2020 10616 - BKF Engineers ADA Barrier Removal Project - 4/27/20 - 5/24/20 1,570.00 2140 EFT 06/26/2020 *10213 - Vision Service Plan-CA Benefit - Vision - June 2020 1,491.00 81231 Check 06/26/2020 10201 - Turf & Industrial Equip. Co.ATV18 JD Gator 400hr service, 2 new front tires 1,425.20 81218 Check 06/26/2020 10056 - Lance Bayer Legal Consulting & Training Services - 4/27 - 5/18 1,425.00 81236 Check 07/03/2020 10706 - Bay Area News Group (Mercury News)Bid Ads Purisima Uplands Demo and Clean-up Project 1,405.26 2139 EFT 06/26/2020 10350 - Valbridge Property Advisors Property Appraisal - 330 Distel Circle 1,302.00 2159 EFT 07/03/2020 11856 - West Coast Arborists, Inc.Fresh Cuts & Stump Treatments - 240 Cristich Lane 1,300.00 2155 EFT 07/03/2020 12117 - Signet Testing Laboratories, Inc.SAO Special Inspection Services 5/29/20 - 6/5/20 1,256.20 81220 Check 06/26/2020 11928 - Old Republic Title Co.Zellerbach Condition of Title Guarantee/Loma Prieta Condition of Title Guarantee 1,200.00 2137 EFT 06/26/2020 *10952 - Sonic.net Internet Services - July 2020 1,170.00 81221 Check 06/26/2020 10397 - Overhead Door Company of Santa Clara Valley Shop Doors Repair/Adjust (FFO)1,005.00 Electronic funds transfer (EFT) for accounts payable disbursements to reduce check printing and mailing, increase payment security, and ensure quicker receipt by vendors page 1 of 8 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT MEETING # 20-14 MEETING DATE: July 08, 2020 Fiscal Year to date EFT:55.87% Fiscal Year 18-19 EFT:29.44% Payment Number Payment Type Payment Date Notes Vendor No. and Name Invoice Description Payment Amount Electronic funds transfer (EFT) for accounts payable disbursements to reduce check printing and mailing, increase payment security, and ensure quicker receipt by vendors 2129 EFT 06/26/2020 10791 - LSA Associates, Inc.Beatty Parking Area and Trail Connections - April 2020 968.75 81216 Check 06/26/2020 *11551 - Green Team of San Jose Garbage Service (RSA), (SAO)895.73 81241 Check 07/03/2020 10058 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore Human Resources Legal Consulting - May 2020 881.00 81243 Check 07/03/2020 10775 - Tyler Technologies Inc Conversion Services - NW Table & Data Fields 700.00 2123 EFT 06/26/2020 10169 - Foster Brothers Security Systems Lock/Door Closer (PuR)670.35 81213 Check 06/26/2020 12090 - Action Towing M27 Tow to SFO 660.00 2149 EFT 07/03/2020 11617 - MIG, Inc.ADA Plan Update - March 2020 641.25 2135 EFT 06/26/2020 12117 - Signet Testing Laboratories, Inc.SAO Special Inspection Services 628.10 2133 EFT 06/26/2020 10099 - San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory American Badger & Burrowing Owl Habitat Suitability Study - May 20 597.00 2127 EFT 06/26/2020 11906 - Law Offices of Gary M. Baum Legal Services - May 2020 570.00 2136 EFT 06/26/2020 10447 - Simms Plumbing & Water Equip., Inc.Water Tank Repair at Big Dipper Residence 524.08 81226 Check 06/26/2020 *10136 - San Jose Water Company Water Service (SAO-Cristich), (BCR)520.30 81227 Check 06/26/2020 10580 - Sharp Business Systems Sharp Copies - printer costs - 4/28/20 - 5/29/20 468.71 81233 Check 06/26/2020 11852 - Western Exterminator Co.Exterminator Service (RSA-Annex)426.50 81212 Check 06/26/2020 *12041 - A T & T Mobility (FirstNet)EOC Emergency Phones - May 2020 (8)353.93 2158 EFT 07/03/2020 11388 - Wagner & Bonsignore Water Rights Services 352.50 81223 Check 06/26/2020 10093 - Rene Hardoy AO Gardening Services 325.00 81228 Check 06/26/2020 10102 - Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP Legal Services - SMC Code Amendments - April 2020 269.50 2150 EFT 07/03/2020 10925 - Papé Machinery T-34 John Deere Excavator Parts 217.82 81225 Check 06/26/2020 10151 - Safety Kleen Systems Inc Solvent Tank Service (FFO)216.90 81214 Check 06/26/2020 10168 - Cintas Shop Towel Service (FFO & SFO)168.95 81217 Check 06/26/2020 11141 - Jarvis Fay & Gibson LLP Legal Services - May 2020 150.00 2152 EFT 07/03/2020 12060 - Preferred Alliance, Inc.Off-Site Participants Testing - May 2020 145.04 81219 Check 06/26/2020 *10664 - Mission Trail Waste Systems AO Garbage Service 140.51 2117 EFT 06/26/2020 10294 - AmeriGas - 0130 Propane Tank Refill (FFO)124.26 81230 Check 06/26/2020 10162 - Terminix Processing Center Pest Control for AO 94.00 81211 Check 06/26/2020 *11880 - A T & T (CALNET3)Mt. Um Safety Phone 45.77 1,921,355.42 *Annual Claims **Hawthorn Expenses A### = Administrative Office Vehicle HR = Human Resources P### = Patrol Vehicle SCNT = Stevens Creek Nature Trail AO2, AO3, AO4 = Leased Office Space IPM = Invasive Plant Maintenance PCR = Purisima Creek Redwoods SCS = Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Area BCR = Bear Creek Redwoods ISM = Invasive Species Management PIC= Picchetti Ranch SFO = Skyline Field Office CAO = Coastal Area Office LH = La Honda Creek PR = Pulgas Ridge SG = Saratoga Gap CC = Coal Creek LR = Long Ridge RR = Russian Ridge SJH = Saint Joseph's Hill DHF = Dear Hollow Farm LT = Los Trancos RR/MIN = Russian Ridge - Mindego Hill SR= Skyline Ridge ECdM = El Corte de Madera M### = Maintenance Vehicle RSA = Rancho San Antonio T### = Tractor or Trailer ES = El Sereno MB = Monte Bello RV = Ravenswood TC = Tunitas Creek FFO = Foothills Field Office MR = Miramontes Ridge SA = Sierra Azul TH = Teague Hill FOOSP = Fremont Older Open Space Pres.OSP = Open Space Preserve SAO = South Area Outpost TW = Thornewood GP = General Preserve SAU = Mount Umunhum WH = Windy Hill Abbreviations page 2 of 8 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT Wells Fargo Credit Card - May 2020 MEETING # 20-14 MEETING DATE 07-08-20 GL Date Amount Description 6/8/2020 69,260.44 Annual Microsoft Software Office 365, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams 6/8/2020 26,560.00 Eucalyptus Tree Removal at RSA 6/8/2020 9,800.00 Violence Prevention Training 6/8/2020 8,074.75 Manure Dump Trailer - Reimbursed by DHF 6/8/2020 7,969.14 Internet Service at AO 6/8/2020 7,693.65 Wildlife Cameras for Mountain Lion Study at Rancho San Antonio 6/8/2020 4,330.82 Touch Free faucets Covid upgrades 6/8/2020 3,103.55 District wide phone service and SAO T1 Internet 6/8/2020 3,045.51 Engine support and motor mount replacement 6/8/2020 3,000.00 Work Delay Charge for Nest Survey - Tree Removal RSA 6/8/2020 2,704.14 Air compressor 6/8/2020 2,625.00 Cloth Facemasks 6/8/2020 2,104.83 M204 AC Evaporator Core and Air Conditioning 6/8/2020 2,095.99 Interpretive Guide Training Mat'l & Certification - Chance 6/8/2020 2,066.52 Touch free faucets for AO2,AO4, and SFO 6/8/2020 2,045.59 T32 Repairs 6/8/2020 1,802.58 3 Kohler touchfree kitchen faucets for AO1, SFO 6/8/2020 1,485.42 SA-Mt Um Radar Tower Fall Protection Roof Anchors 6/8/2020 1,421.07 Debris Disposal 6/8/2020 1,400.00 Online Course Registration Fee ArcGIS Pro 4/23-24 – A.Peth 6/8/2020 1,387.92 SFO Propane 6/8/2020 1,368.00 Ultra violet bulbs 6/8/2020 1,348.25 Touchless Flushing Units for Field Office Toilets 6/8/2020 1,305.47 COVID-19 Signs. Quantity: 36. 6/8/2020 1,179.01 SFO Propane 6/8/2020 1,174.00 Pre-employment physical and Commercial DL recertification 6/8/2020 1,144.50 Face Masks 6/8/2020 1,106.54 Touchless ADA Bottle Filler 6/8/2020 1,080.63 Four new BFGoodrich All-Terrain Tires 6/8/2020 1,070.60 Geocortex Workflow training for Data Analyst I 6/8/2020 1,035.00 Toastmasters Membership Renewal 6/8/2020 1,000.00 Cloth Facemasks 6/8/2020 1,000.00 Cloth facemasks 6/8/2020 1,000.00 Cloth facemasks 6/8/2020 962.53 2 Tractor Tires for John Deere 6330 - TO27 6/8/2020 882.63 Nerf bars for FFO patrol vehicles 6/8/2020 813.90 Kestrel Weather Meters 6/8/2020 810.61 Law enforcement gear, batons, cases, belts, etc. 6/8/2020 725.00 Annual Membership - Sunnyvale Chamber - Hood 6/8/2020 710.13 Uniform Hats With Embroidery Patches 6/8/2020 698.50 WT02 Tow Due to Rear Axel Leak 6/8/2020 679.22 Sprayers for applying disinfectant 6/8/2020 678.94 Refrigerator for Monte Bello Cabin Residence 6/8/2020 675.13 Restroom Cleaning Supplies 6/8/2020 613.97 Touch free kitchen faucet for FFO 6/8/2020 607.54 COVID-19 Signs. Quantity: 12. 6/8/2020 589.36 Restroom cleaning supplies 6/8/2020 557.82 SA-Kennedy Rd - Sanitation Service 6/8/2020 547.53 Plexi Partition Supports 6/8/2020 541.48 COVID-19 Signs. Quantity: 13. 6/8/2020 509.93 Thermometers 6/8/2020 500.00 Bay Area Air Quality Mgmt Hazardous Matl's Abatement Fee - SAO 6/8/2020 499.90 Nitrile Gloves 6/8/2020 478.40 Permit fees for foundation on the interior of the structure 6/8/2020 463.50 Property Research Services - April 2020 6/8/2020 459.90 Zoom subscription for virtual public meetings 6/8/2020 455.75 Face Masks 6/8/2020 455.46 Batteries for radios 6/8/2020 450.00 Website hosting - May 2020 6/8/2020 450.00 CAPPO Procurement Conference Reg Fee Jan 2020 - McDaniel 6/8/2020 450.00 Tow vehicle from AO to Mission Valley Ford 6/8/2020 441.32 Nerf bar for FFO patrol vehicle. 6/8/2020 425.00 SA-Mt Um - Rental Pedestrian Canopy 6/8/2020 418.89 Technical support calls 6/8/2020 409.97 Office Supplies related to COVID-19 - Bankers boxes 6/8/2020 387.04 Hotel room for Online PC832 class - Schenck 6/8/2020 371.45 ATV Helmet/Goggles for John H., Cody F. 6/8/2020 363.17 SFO Garbage and Recycle 6/8/2020 354.20 Facebook Advertising - April 2020 6/8/2020 350.00 Job announcement Budget Manager - AFP Online Job Center 6/8/2020 343.18 Face Masks 6/8/2020 330.00 Monthly Rental for Storage Unit 6/8/2020 327.99 Fans for public restrooms 6/8/2020 319.83 Visitor Survey Flyers (Qty 50) 6/8/2020 306.96 Lumber and Hardware for DHF Manure Mgmt Project 6/8/2020 300.39 COVID-19 Signs. Quantity: 6 6/8/2020 290.00 Subscription to Cattlefax (marketing/pricing info) - Weidemann 6/8/2020 289.95 Windex Disinfectant Spray 6/8/2020 285.24 Wireless antenna for providing internet at Nature Center as SFO 6/8/2020 283.35 Ravenswood Bay Trail Signage 6/8/2020 276.98 SA-Mt Um - Fencing Rental @ Summit 6/8/2020 275.33 T28-Bobcat Coupler Kit and Hydraulic Fluid 6/8/2020 275.00 Job announcement Budget Manager - CA Society of Municipal 6/8/2020 273.28 Network switch for use at Nature Center at SFO 6/8/2020 270.70 Laminating sheets for preserve signs 6/8/2020 270.26 Ballasts for UV Lights at Bergman Main House 6/8/2020 269.39 Axial Fans for Public Restrooms 6/8/2020 247.83 Escutcheons for touch free kitchen faucets 6/8/2020 245.41 Plastic bottles, soap dispencers 6/8/2020 243.23 Field supplies for pressing plants 6/8/2020 235.15 Field Supplies 6/8/2020 228.65 Marketing Email - May 2020 6/8/2020 227.10 3 Oil filled radiator heaters for Silva house 6/8/2020 225.00 Towing Services for M204 6/8/2020 222.29 Car chargers 6/8/2020 220.00 Pre-employment physical 6/8/2020 218.00 LexisNexis Online Subscription - April 2020 6/8/2020 216.30 Hitch Rack for E-Bike 6/8/2020 208.00 American Public Works Asscn Membership for AGM 6/8/2020 200.00 Monthly payment for Logmein Rescue remote admin tool 6/8/2020 200.00 LCW Webinar - COVID 6/8/2020 197.42 Consultant Programming on Word report templates 6/8/2020 191.76 Laminating Sheets for Quarterly Docent Activities 6/8/2020 189.35 Water line repair from house fire 6/8/2020 184.16 Hydraulic oil for heavy equipment 6/8/2020 181.30 Laser detector and car chargers 6/8/2020 180.00 Renewal of Costco membership for 2020 6/8/2020 176.37 Poison ivy scrub 6/8/2020 168.25 Check Valves for Faucet Upgrades - Covid 19 6/8/2020 168.00 Hand sanitizer 6/8/2020 166.35 Rodent deterrent sonic devices for various residential houses 6/8/2020 162.78 Sloan Valve Retrofit kit for AO urinal 6/8/2020 162.38 Upgrade to Office 365 G5 x 1 License 6/8/2020 162.05 Towing Service for M204 6/8/2020 159.00 Job announcement Budget Manager - Government Finance Office 6/8/2020 155.80 Lumber for DHF Manure Mgmt Project 6/8/2020 150.73 Black Disposable Nitrile Gloves 6/8/2020 141.83 AO Water Service 6/8/2020 135.27 Metal for restrooms 6/8/2020 130.74 Bike Brakes 6/8/2020 130.27 Parts for Faucet Upgrades - Covid 19 6/8/2020 130.00 CAPPO Membership - Jaskulak 6/8/2020 129.93 Deposits Receivable 6/8/2020 128.52 PC 832 Class for Ranger - Cowan 6/8/2020 128.52 PC 832 Class for Ranger - Schenck 6/8/2020 127.22 Parts for faucet installations - Covid 19 6/8/2020 122.75 Consultant Programming Work on Word Report Templates 6/8/2020 121.85 Safety Glasses 6/8/2020 121.63 Water Service for Rentals 6/8/2020 120.45 Key lock boxes for various residential properties 6/8/2020 116.40 Parts for Faucet Upgrades - Covid 19 6/8/2020 115.60 Toilet paper 6/8/2020 113.25 Water Service for Rentals 6/8/2020 111.40 M24 Tow Hitch and Lock 6/8/2020 110.00 CSMFO Membership - Jaskulak 6/8/2020 110.00 Municipal Clerk Assoc Membership GMO Admin Assistant - Lumina 6/8/2020 103.28 Field Supplies 6/8/2020 100.74 AO Plumbing Supplies 6/8/2020 99.00 Online Field Training Officer refresher - Barshow 6/8/2020 99.00 FTO Refresher Training - Verbrugge 6/8/2020 98.58 Batteries for counters 6/8/2020 95.70 Spray bottles, extensions cords and hooks 6/8/2020 93.98 AO Plumbing Materials 6/8/2020 92.47 Insect repellent and sunsreen 6/8/2020 88.22 Shop Supplies 6/8/2020 87.98 AO Plumbing Supplies 6/8/2020 80.71 Restroom cleaning supplies 6/8/2020 80.00 Nat'l Assoc for Interpretation InterpTech Online Conf - Vuoso 6/8/2020 80.00 Nat'l Assoc Interpretation InterpTech Online Conf - Fitzsimons 6/8/2020 80.00 Nat'l Assoc for Interpretation InterpTech Online Conf - Tjosvold 6/8/2020 76.25 Batteries for marbled murrelet acoustic recording units 6/8/2020 75.00 LCW Webinar - COVID 6/8/2020 75.00 Family First Coronavirius Response Act Training - Basnight 6/8/2020 75.00 Reg Gov Services Leading Remote Teams webinar - Kern 6/8/2020 75.00 Reg Gov Services Leading Remote Teams webinar - MacKessy 6/8/2020 75.00 MB Pay Phone 6/8/2020 75.00 MMANC Annual Membership - Bazar 6/8/2020 74.34 FOOSP - Sanitation Service ADA 6/8/2020 71.33 DHF - Supplies for Manure Project 6/8/2020 70.71 Paint and supplies for parking lot striping project 6/8/2020 70.00 WH Annual Water Back - flow Prevention Assembly Inspection 6/8/2020 69.08 SFO Water chlorine system 6/8/2020 69.00 Online FTO Refresher Training - Hapke 6/8/2020 68.87 Parts for plexiglass installation at AO 6/8/2020 66.97 Waterline repair from house fire 6/8/2020 66.61 Adobe Acrobat DC x 1 licenses 6/8/2020 65.00 Webinar- Implementing an Electronic Content Mgmt System - Soria 6/8/2020 64.26 Purell Sanitizer Dispenser 6/8/2020 63.64 Hard hat face shield adapter 6/8/2020 63.55 Thermopile for furnace at Bergman guest house 6/8/2020 62.48 Misc shop supplies 6/8/2020 60.00 Rainwise Annual Renewal 6/8/2020 58.98 Wall Pockets 6/8/2020 58.91 Wiper blades for P108 6/8/2020 58.21 Parts for FFO mens room urinal 6/8/2020 55.16 Gas Charge Error - Reimbursement to Follow - Mort 6/8/2020 54.60 Laminating sheets 6/8/2020 54.56 Shop Supplies 6/8/2020 54.44 DHF - Supplies for Manure Project 6/8/2020 53.55 WH Water Meter 6/8/2020 53.12 Water Service for Rentals 6/8/2020 51.27 Spray bottles for vehicle disinfecting 6/8/2020 50.57 Zanfel - Poison Oak Treatment 6/8/2020 50.26 Laminating pouches 6/8/2020 50.19 Thumb drive 6/8/2020 50.00 Webinar - Leveraging Every Conversation - Soria 6/8/2020 50.00 Clerks Virtual Institute - Leveraging Conversations 6/8/2020 50.00 FFO Backup internet service 6/8/2020 50.00 Gordon Ridge SMC Notice of Exemption filing fee 6/8/2020 49.50 Web forms - May 2020 6/8/2020 49.16 Cleaning supplies 6/8/2020 49.01 Parts for pressure washer 6/8/2020 49.00 Social Media Management - May 2020 6/8/2020 48.45 Parts for plexiglass install at AO1 6/8/2020 43.66 Ratchet set for SAO 6/8/2020 42.55 Parts for plexiglass install at AO 6/8/2020 42.09 Sunscreen and febreze 6/8/2020 41.46 Supplies for Visitor Counters 6/8/2020 39.12 Cases of Water for visitor use 6/8/2020 39.00 Web PDF Viewer - May 2020 6/8/2020 38.35 Metal for restrooms 6/8/2020 38.20 DHF - Washing Machine Hose 6/8/2020 37.80 Shipped tool out for repair 6/8/2020 37.10 USB Microphones for laptops 6/8/2020 35.00 Webinar - Extraordinary Resilience Registration - Soria 6/8/2020 34.77 Grout Sealer for Shower 6/8/2020 33.70 Water for all Rangers Patrol Trucks/for Visitors 6/8/2020 31.64 Headlamp bulb for P98 6/8/2020 31.59 Water Heater Parts for DHF 6/8/2020 30.50 Fuel Stabilizer 6/8/2020 30.24 FOOSP - Water Service 6/8/2020 29.67 Putty for soldering 6/8/2020 29.40 Supplies for visitor counters (2 transactions) 6/8/2020 29.29 Website Analytics - May 2020 6/8/2020 29.17 M213 Hitch 6/8/2020 29.00 Midpen Webstore - May 2020 6/8/2020 28.63 2.5 Gallon Container for Cleaning Supplies 6/8/2020 28.42 5 Gallon Container for Cleaning Supplies 6/8/2020 27.30 Saw blades for plexiglass install at AO1 6/8/2020 27.23 Hardware for restrooms solar fans 6/8/2020 27.04 Plumbing parts house fire waterline repair 6/8/2020 26.20 Canycom Mower Wheel Bolts 6/8/2020 25.00 Stamps for SFO 6/8/2020 23.97 Rubber Boots for Cleaning Restrooms 6/8/2020 21.84 Outlet timer for SFOShop 6/8/2020 21.66 Surge protector for use as Nature Center 6/8/2020 19.86 Thermometer for Health Check 6/8/2020 19.65 CAO Spring water line repair 6/8/2020 19.00 Webinar - Registration fee PL Staff 6/8/2020 17.49 Sample items for store or promotion 6/8/2020 16.94 Temporary No Parking Signs 6/8/2020 16.45 Thermometer - B Downing 6/8/2020 16.38 Black ink for the printer I am using at home for work - Vargas 6/8/2020 15.96 Ongoing Subscription - LA Times 6/8/2020 14.44 Nuts-Bolts for Restroom Truck 6/8/2020 14.16 HDMI cable to connect laptop - Werner 6/8/2020 14.09 Thermometer 6/8/2020 11.99 Capacity upgrade for Dropbox account used for Board packets 6/8/2020 11.99 Capacity upgrade for Dropbox account used for Board packets 6/8/2020 10.00 Open Spaces Closed for Business Parks and Pandemic Reg - AGM 6/8/2020 10.00 Supply Chain Webinar 6/8/2020 9.53 Plumbing repair from house fire 6/8/2020 8.17 Bulb for Brake Light P113 6/8/2020 7.00 GIS help desk 6/8/2020 6.54 Hand Sanitation Bottles for Trucks/Heavy Equipment 6/8/2020 6.11 Lithium Grease for Deck Mower 6/8/2020 5.59 Padded Envelope and Postage - Mailed Tick to the lab 6/8/2020 5.00 UV Light Webinar 6/8/2020 5.00 Ca Science Teacher Assoc Webinar - COVID-19 distance learning 6/8/2020 5.00 California Science Teachers webinar - Tjosvold 6/8/2020 3.20 CAO Water System 6/8/2020 (16.94) Credit return from Zoro Tools 6/8/2020 (21.85) M24 - Return/Exchange Tow Hitch 6/8/2020 (26.88) Return of faucet parts 6/8/2020 (131.93) Return - Poison Oak Treatment 6/8/2020 (131.94) Return - Poison Oak Treatment 6/8/2020 (191.90) Credit for order for non-deliver - office closure 6/8/2020 (216,562.59) WFB Credit Card Charges May 2020 Rev. 1/3/18 R-20-74 Meeting 20-14 July 8, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 3 AGENDA ITEM Award of Contract for Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting at Eight Mitigation Sites for Five Years (2020-2024) GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into contract with Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting for the base contract price of $81,292 to monitor eight mitigation sites for five years. 2. Authorize an allowance of $20,000 to be expended only if additional mitigation sites require monitoring and reporting over the next five years. 3. Authorize a 10% contingency of $8,130 to be expended only if the eight mitigation sites do not meet permit success criteria, additional years of monitoring are required, and/or additional coordination with the permitting agencies is necessary, for a not-to-exceed total contract of $109,422. SUMMARY The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) has implemented capital improvement projects that require permits from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the Regional Water Quality Board (RWQCB), and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Mitigation Monitoring Plans (MMPs) or Vegetation Restoration Plans (VRPs) developed by the District or District Consultants, in consultation with permitting agencies, outline required mitigation measures for potential temporary and/or permanent impacts related to a project. The recommended 5-year contract will authorize Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting to monitor and report on eight mitigation sites for five years for a base contract amount of $81,292. In addition, the General Manager recommends authorizing an allowance of $20,000 to accommodate any additional monitoring and reporting of newly installed mitigation sites in years 2021-2024, and a 10% contingency of $8,130 to be expended only if mitigation sites do not meet permit success criteria, additional years of monitoring are required, and/or additional coordination with the permitting agencies is necessary, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $109,422. The Fiscal Year 2020-21 (FY21) budget includes sufficient funds to cover expenditures through June 30, 2021. Funds to complete the contract work in future years will be proposed as part of the annual Budget and Action Plan process. DISCUSSION Capital and operational projects that affect the natural environment have the potential to impact native species and/or the jurisdictional areas regulated by the California Department of Fish and R-20-74 Page 2 Wildlife (CDFW), and/or United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) mitigation measures and/or regulatory permits often require biological surveys, documentation, and mitigation of potential impacts to natural resources, including native plant restoration to reestablish normal ecological function. Some of this work has been implemented under Routine Maintenance Agreements (i.e. a broad permit with generalized mitigation conditions) and others have obtained individual permits (i.e. a specific permit with specific mitigation conditions). Mitigation Monitoring Plans (MMPs) or Vegetation Restoration Plans (VRPs) developed by the District or District Consultants, in consultation with permitting agencies, outline required mitigation measures for potential temporary and/or permanent impacts related to a project. These measures often include native plantings to restore ecological functions. The associated mitigation monitoring of installed vegetation and site conditions are reported to permitting agencies for five to ten years, or more, after a project is completed. The monitoring reports document native vegetation and ecological function reestablishment at the sites and any necessary adaptive management measures to ensure all permit conditions and MMP success criteria are achieved. The following tasks are included under the recommended 5-year agreement for Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting at Eight Mitigation Sites to ensure permit conditions and MMP success criteria are met at each Mitigation Site: • Review permits and permit conditions to confirm monitoring and reporting requirements; • Annually conduct mitigation site monitoring of installed vegetation and site conditions; • Recommend adaptive management actions to ensure success criteria are met; • Prepare Draft Mitigation Monitoring Reports for District review; • Prepare Final Mitigation Monitoring Reports to submit to permitting agencies. The following projects require mitigation monitoring and reporting to be compliant with permit conditions and fulfill mitigation requirements: Table 1: Mitigation projects requiring monitoring and reporting under this contract Project Site # Site Name Open Space Preserve Project Type Project Site Size Project Description 1 Mount Umunhum Trail Sierra Azul Mitigation 8,700 ft² Permit requirements for Mount Umunhum Trail bridges 2 Woods Trail Sierra Azul Mitigation 12,000 ft² Permit requirements for Mount Umunhum Trail bridges 3 Tree Farm Bear Creek Redwoods Mitigation 3.76 acres Permit requirements for the new public access parking lot 4 Mud Lake Bear Creek Redwoods Mitigation 1,080 ft2 Permit conditions for installation of new culvert 5 Stables Bear Creek Redwoods Mitigation 10,000 ft2 Riparian Tree Removals for Fuel Management Work 6 Webb Creek Bear Creek Redwoods Mitigations 2,271 ft2 Permit conditions for new bridge 7 Stevens Creek Nature Trail Monte Bello Mitigation 3,200 ft² Permit conditions for bridge and trail improvements 8 Harkins Bridge Purisima Creek Redwoods Mitigation 10,890 ft² Permit conditions for new bridge R-20-74 Page 3 District staff are not available to perform this work due to the ongoing commitments for Measure AA and Vision Plan projects, and to complete core job responsibilities. Contractor Selection A Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFPQ) was sent to 13 consultants and posted on the District website on May 5, 2020. Two addenda were issued. Seven proposals were received. Three District staff from two departments ranked proposals based on the quality of the proposal, including the consistency with the objectives, ability to demonstrate an understanding of the project, fulfilling proposal requirements, and overall presentation. In addition, the proposals were ranked on the implementation approach and ability to meet the project schedule. Proposal fees for the base contract ranged from $69,466 to $125,474. After a careful review of all the proposals, District staff determined Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting to be the most qualified and cost-effective consultant to conduct the mitigation monitoring and reporting. Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting submitted their base contract proposal at a cost of $69,466. After Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting’s proposal was selected, Addendum 2 was issued to include monitoring and reporting for the Bear Creek Redwoods Stables Mitigation Site also for 5-years, for a fee of $11,826, bringing the revised Project base cost total to $81,292. The base cost for this service is $81,292 over a 5-year period. In addition, the General Manager recommends an allowance in the amount of $20,000 to accommodate any mitigation monitoring and reporting for additional Projects that may require installation of plants at mitigation sites in future years, and a 10% contingency of $8,130 to be expended only if mitigation sites do not meet permit success criteria, additional years of monitoring are required, and/or additional coordination with the regulatory agencies is necessary, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $109,422. FISCAL IMPACT There are sufficient funds in the Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget to cover the cost of the recommendation. Funds to complete the work will be recommended in future fiscal year budgets as a part of the annual Budget and Action Plan process. The recommended action is not funded by Measure AA. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This item was not previously reviewed by a Board committee. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. Public notice was sent to the Resource Management interested parties lists by postal or electronic mail. R-20-74 Page 4 CEQA COMPLIANCE This item is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. The work performed by the consultant under the proposed contract will help ensure that the District fulfills its CEQA mitigation monitoring commitments for Projects that are otherwise complete. NEXT STEPS Upon approval by the Board of Directors, the General Manager will execute an agreement with Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting to complete mitigation monitoring and reporting at eight mitigation sites for five years. Natural Resources department staff will continue to work with the Engineering and Construction, Land and Facilities, and Planning departments to design projects that avoid and/or minimize the impacts of capital and operational projects and reduce the amount of required future mitigation work and associated monitoring and reporting. Attachment 1. Project Locations Responsible Department Head: Kirk Lenington, Natural Resources Department Prepared by: Amanda Mills, Resource Management Specialist II P U R I S I M A C R E E K R E D W O O D S M I R A M O N T E S R I D G E T U N I TA S C R E E K E L C O R T E D E M A D E R A C R E E K T E A G U E H I L L T H O R N E W O O D L A H O N D A C R E E K W I N D Y H I L L C O A L C R E E K L O N G R I D G E B E A R C R E E K R E D W O O D S S I E R R A A Z U L M O N T E B E L L O R A N C H O S A N A N T O N I O F R E M O N T O L D E R P I C C H E T T I R A N C H S A R AT O G A G A P S K Y L I N E R I D G E E L S E R E N O J O S E P H ’ S H I L L S T E V E N S C R E E K S H O R E L I N E N AT U R E S T U D Y A R E A P A C I F I C O C E A N ÄÆ1 ÄÆ101 ÄÆ280 ÄÆ35 ÄÆ84 ÄÆ ÄÆ17 ÄÆ237 ÄÆ87 ÄÆ880 ÄÆ680 ÄÆ17 ÄÆ9 ÄÆ84 ÄÆ101 ÄÆ85 R U S S I A N R I D G E Purisima Creek Redwoods 8.Harkins Bridge Monte Bello 7.Stevens Creek Nature Trail Bear Creek Redwoods 3.Tree Farm 4.Mud Lake 5.Stables 6.Webb Creek Sierra Azul 1. Mount Umunhum Trail 2. Woods Trail Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (Midpen) 6/12/2020 Mitigation Monitoring Sites Pa t h : G : \ P r o j e c t s \ B e a r _ C r e e k _ R e d w o o d s \ V e g e t a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t \ R e v e g _ O v e r v i e w _ 2 0 2 0 0 6 1 0 \ R e v e g S i t e s _ O v e r v i e w _ 2 0 2 0 0 6 1 0 . m x d Cr e a t e d B y : f l o p e z 0 105 MilesIPrivate Property While the District strives to use the best available digital data, these data do not represent a legal survey and are merely a graphic illustration of geographic features. Other Protected Lands !(Revegetation SiteMROSD Preserve ATTACHMENT 1 Rev. 1/3/18 R-20-66 Meeting 20-14 July 8, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 4 AGENDA ITEM Award of Contract to Andreini Brothers for the ADA Barrier Removal Project at Russian Ridge, Monte Bello, and Windy Hill Open Space Preserves GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with Andreini Brothers of Half Moon Bay, CA, for the base amount of $429,504. 2. Authorize a 13% contingency of $55,836 to be reserved for unanticipated issues, bringing the total contract to a not-to-exceed amount of $485,340. SUMMARY The ADA Barrier Removal Project (Project) will replace existing dilapidated restrooms and install accessible parking and pathways at Russian Ridge, Monte Bello, and Windy Hill Open Space Preserves. The Project includes American with Disabilities Act (ADA)-complaint upgrades to restrooms, accessible parking stalls, pathways, signage, drainage infrastructure, and split-rail fences. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) staff issued a Request for Bids on May 6, 2020 and received eight (8) bid proposals on June 3, 2020, with GradeTech Inc. (GradeTech) announced as the apparent low bidder. Subsequently, Andreini Brothers, the second low bidder, protested that GradeTech’s bid proposal is incomplete and should be rejected as non-responsive. Upon reviewing the Bid Proposals and following the Bid Protest procedures set forth in the District’s Instructions to Bidders, the General Manager determined that GradeTech’s bid is indeed non-responsive and recommends awarding a contract to Andreini Brothers as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, for a base amount of $429,504 and authorizing a 13% contingency amount of $55,836. There are sufficient funds to complete the recommendations in the fiscal year 2020-21 (FY21) budget. BACKGROUND In May 2019, the District completed the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Update (Transition Plan), which evaluated the conditions of District facilities and preserves with current ADA codes and standards (R-19-38). From the Transition Plan’s evaluations and recommendations, the annual ADA Barrier Removal Project was created to systematically remove accessibility barriers at District facilities and preserves. In general, projects include modernization and ADA upgrades to restrooms, accessible parking and pathways, easy access trails, signage, facilities, and other amenities. The District tracks and reports annual accomplishments of completed projects and tasks to the Board of Directors (Board) as part of the annual ADA Transition Plan implementation update starting winter of 2021. To date, the Land R-20-66 Page 2 and Facilities (L&F) Department has completed a number of ADA Transition Plan recommendations to upgrade stiles and adjust restroom doors throughout District preserves for improved accessibility. For the FY20 ADA Barrier Removal Project, staff prioritized the replacement of three dilapidated restrooms and accessible parking stalls based on input from the L&F Department. In December 2019, the District hired engineering consultants to generate construction documents for the restroom and parking lot improvements. The consultants completed the design early this year. District staff submitted plans for permitting and is currently waiting for final approval. In May 2020, the Board approved the purchase of the Project’s three (3) CXT ADA-compliant prefabricated vault restrooms to be installed by a separate contractor (R-20-46). Within the past five years, the District has successfully installed CXT Restrooms at La Honda Creek, Bear Creek Redwoods, and Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserves. DISCUSSION The Project will upgrade and improve ADA accessibility at Russian Ridge, Monte Bello, and Windy Hill Open Space Preserves parking areas. Construction includes removing existing dilapidated single-stall vault restrooms, installing new double stall ADA and California Building Code compliant CXT vault restrooms, installing ADA parking stalls, and constructing ADA accessible paths from parking stalls to restrooms. In addition, the recommendations include demolition, minor grading, concrete work, drainage infrastructure, striping and pavement markings, split rail fencing and signage. The proposed improvements will provide the required number of ADA parking stalls at each parking site consistent with current ADA requirements and remove a number of ADA barriers identified in the ADA Transition Plan. The Project sites are located within the jurisdiction of the City of Palo Alto, Town of Portola Valley, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County. Staff submitted for permits from these agencies, including building permits, demolition permits, and architectural design review. The District has already obtained permits from the Town of Portola Valley and anticipates receiving the remaining permits prior to the commencement of construction. In summary, the scope of work under the recommended contract includes the following improvements: • Remove three dilapidated restrooms and excavate vault pits to receive three new CXT double vault restrooms; • Eight ADA accessible parking stalls; • Pavement striping; • Seven ADA curb ramps; • 250 lineal feet of concrete pathways from parking stalls to restrooms and trailhead; and • Parking lot drainage. CONTRACTOR SELECTION A Request for Bids was issued on May 6, 2020 via BidSync and released to four builders’ exchanges. Legal notices were posted in the San Jose Mercury News and San Mateo County Times, and a link to the solicitation was posted on the District website. An optional pre-bid meeting was held on May 19, 2020 with seven total contractors in attendance. R-20-66 Page 3 The District publicly opened the bids on June 3, 2020 and announced GradeTech Inc., as the apparent low bidder. The detailed breakdown of the eight (8) bids received is as follows: Bidder Location Total Base Bid Percent +/- from District’s Estimate ($470,000)* 1. GradeTech Inc. San Ramon, CA $427,040 -9% 2. Andreini Brothers Half Moon Bay, CA $429,504 -9% 3. MVC Enterprises Inc. Temecula, CA $432,828 -8% 4. Burch Construction San Francisco, CA $465,027 -1% 5. NBC Construction & Engineering Inc. San Francisco, CA $478,288 +2% 6. Graniterock Company Watsonville, CA $485,457 +3% 7. Lewis & Tibbits San Jose, CA $510,879 +9% 8. Yerba Buena Engineering Inc. San Francisco, CA $535,400 +14% *Estimate was prepared by District staff for budgeting purposes. The estimate was informed by data base numbers on file from previous projects. Andreini Brothers submitted a timely bid protest on June 10, 2020, stating that GradeTech did not sign the corporate resolution as required on the Instructions to Bidders and Bid Proposal Form, therefore, their bid should be rejected as non-responsive and the Project should be awarded to Andreini Brothers, the second lowest bidder. The District issued a protest notice to GradeTech on June 12, 2020, and GradeTech responded and provided a corporate resolution on June 15, 2020, well after the complete bid proposal was due. A responsive bid within the meaning of state contract law is one that, on its face, is in compliance with all of the requirements set forth in the bid documents. The District’s Instructions to Bidders and Bid Proposal Form requires bidders to provide a corporate resolution. GradeTech submitted a bid that lacked this required form by the due date. After a careful review of all the bid documents, GradeTech’s bid was subsequently deemed as being not in full compliance with all of the requirements set forth in the bid documents and therefore not responsive. Upon reviewing the Bid Proposals and following the Bid Protest procedures set forth in the District’s Instructions to Bidders, the General Manager recommends awarding the contract to Andreini Brothers as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. In addition, the General Manager recommends a 13% contingency be reserved for unanticipated issues. FISCAL IMPACT The FY21 budget includes $487,000 for the ADA Barrier Removal Project #31901. The FY21 budget also includes $42,350 in gift funds for work specifically in the Windy Hill Open Space Preserve from the Peninsula Open Space Trust. There are sufficient funds in the project budget to cover the recommended action and expenditures. R-20-66 Page 4 ADA Barrier Removal 31901 Prior Year Actuals* FY20 Amended FY21 Projected FY22 Projected Estimated Future Years TOTAL District Funded: $439 $223,500 $444,650 $1,433,500 $0 $2,102,089 Gift from POST: $0 $0 $42,350 $0 $0 $42,350 Total Budget: $439 $223,500 $487,000 $1,433,500 $0 $2,144,439 Spent-to-Date (as of 6/5/2020): ($439) ($111,328) $0 $0 $0 ($111,767) Encumbrances: $0 ($1,655) $0 $0 $0 ($1,655) Andreini Brothers. award of contract: $0 $0 ($429,504) $0 $0 ($429,504) 13% Contingency: $0 $0 ($55,836) $0 $0 ($55,836) Budget Remaining (Proposed): $0 $110,517 $1,660 $1,433,500 $0 $1,545,677 *Prior Year Actuals for the R-20-46 board report (Award of Contract to LB Foster Company for Prefabricated Vault Restrooms to be Installed at Russian Ridge, Monte Bello, and Windy Hill Open Space Preserves) were overstated using budgeted numbers. The recommended action is not funded by Measure AA. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW No Committee review has previously occurred for the recommended award of contract PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. CEQA COMPLIANCE In accordance with the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction of existing facilities and structures, and Section 15304, Minor Alterations to Land. This exemption consists of minor public or private alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic tree. District staff filed Notices of Exemption with San Mateo County on January 27, 2020 and Santa Clara County on January 28, 2020. NEXT STEPS If approved, the General Manager will enter into a contract with Andreini Brothers. Final contract signature is subject to meeting all District requirements, such as having all required insurance and bonding in place. Construction will begin July 2020 and be completed by November 2020. Attachment: 1. Project Site Map Responsible Department Head: Jason Lin, Engineering and Construction Department Manager R-20-66 Page 5 Prepared by: Sean Smith, Capital Project Manager II, Engineering and Construction Department Graphics prepared by: Francisco Lopez Tapia, GIS Technician, Information Systems and Technology Department Pag e M i l l R d Alpin e R d Skyli n e B lv d. A l pine R d Pag e M ill R d Windy Hilll Preserve Parking Lot Portol a R d Monte Bello Preserve Parking LotRussian Ridge Preserve Parking Lot Los Altos C O A L C R E E K O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E F O O T H I L L S O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E L A H O N D A C R E E K O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E L O S T R A N C O S O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E M O N T E B E L L O O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E R U S S I A N R I D G E O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E W I N D Y H I L L O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E S K Y L I N E R I D G E O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E R A N C H O S A N A N T O N I O O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E ÄÆ84 ÄÆ35 ÄÆ280 ÄÆ280 ÄÆ35 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (Midpen) 5/4/2020 A: Project Location Map Pa t h : G : \ P r o j e c t s \ R u s s i a n _ R i d g e \ L o c a t i o n M a p \ B i d p a c k a g e _ L o c a t i o n M a p _ 2 0 2 0 0 3 2 6 . m x d Cr e a t e d B y : f l o p e z 0 21 MilesI MROSD Preserves Private Property While the District strives to use the best available digital data, these data do not represent a legal survey and are merely a graphic illustration of geographic features. Parking Lot Area of Detail ÄÆ84 ÄÆ9 ÄÆ82 ÄÆ280 ÄÆ35 ÄÆ236 ÄÆ35 ÄÆ17 ÄÆ35ÄÆ92 ÄÆ280 ÄÆ1 ÄÆ85 Half Moon Bay Redwood City San Carlos East Palo Alto Los Altos Mountain View Palo Alto Cupertino Saratoga Sunnyvale Other Protected Lands ATTACHMENT 1 R-20-72 Meeting 20-14 July 8, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 5 AGENDA ITEM Establish the Fiscal Year 2021 Tax Levy for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s General Obligation Bonds - Series 2015A, Series 2015B, and Series 2018 GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolutions of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District for each of San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz Counties to establish an ad valorem property tax levy of $1.50 per $100,000 (or $0.0015 per $100) in assessed value for the General Obligation Bonds – Series 2015A, Series 2015B, and Series 2018 (Measure AA). SUMMARY On June 3, 2014, voters of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) approved the passage of Measure AA authorizing the District to issue up to $300 million of general obligation bonds (Bonds) over thirty years to finance Measure AA capital projects. In 2015, the District issued $40,000,000 of tax-exempt bonds (Series A) and $5,000,000 of taxable bonds (Series B). The District subsequently issued $50,000,000 of tax-exempt bonds in February 2018. The proposed Fiscal Year 2021 tax levy of $0.0015 per $100, or $1.50 per $100,000 in assessed value, will provide the District with sufficient revenues to pay the related debt service payments through September 2021. DISCUSSION Debt service payments on the Bonds are paid through a tax levy on all taxable property within the District. Each year, the levy is calculated based on the assessed value and the debt service amount the District needs to collect. The evolution of the tax levy is as follows: FY16 $.0008 per $100 of assessed valuation FY17 $.0006 per $100 of assessed valuation FY18 $.0009 per $100 of assessed valuation FY19 $.0018 per $100 of assessed valuation FY20 $.0016 per $100 of assessed valuation FY21 $.0015 per $100 of assessed valuation Based on the debt service schedule for the Bonds, and tax revenue projections provided by the District’s Tax Administration Consultant (Goodwin Consulting Group), the Board is asked to approve resolutions for each of the three Counties authorizing the placement of an ad valorem property tax levy of $0.0015 per $100, or $1.50 per $100,000 in assessed value. R-20-72 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT The establishment of the ad valorem property tax levy will provide the District with sufficient revenues to pay the scheduled debt service payments on related debt service September 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, and September 1, 2021. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This item was not previously reviewed by a Board Committee. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice was provided pursuant to the Brown Act. No additional notice is necessary. CEQA COMPLIANCE No compliance is required as this action is not a project under CEQA. NEXT STEPS If approved by the Board, the General Manager will direct staff to forward the resolutions to the relevant departments and Board of Supervisors of each County for inclusion in the 2020-2021 property tax bills. Attachments: 1. Resolution of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Setting the Tax Rate on Voter Approved General Obligation Bonds – County of San Mateo 2. Resolution of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Setting the Tax Rate on Voter Approved General Obligation Bonds – County of Santa Clara 3. Resolution of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Setting the Tax Rate on Voter Approved General Obligation Bonds – County of Santa Cruz Responsible Department Head: Stefan Jaskulak, Chief Financial Officer/Director of Administrative Services Prepared by: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager Resolutions/2019/19-___SMC Measure AA Levy 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20-____ A RESOLUTION OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SETTING THE 2020-21 TAX RATE FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY ON VOTER APPROVED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the “District”) is a regional open space district that includes territory in each of the County of San Mateo, the County of Santa Clara and the County of Santa Cruz (each, a “County”; collectively, the “Counties”); and WHEREAS, the District is empowered to issue general obligation bonds that are authorized by two-thirds of the qualified electors of the District pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Chapter 3 of Division 5 of the Public Resources Code and Article 4.5, commencing with Section 53506, of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (collectively, the “Act”); and WHEREAS, a special bond election was duly and regularly held in the District on June 3, 2014, for the purpose of submitting a ballot measure to the qualified electors of the District (the "2014 Authorization"), and more than two-thirds of the votes cast at the election approved the issuance of up to $300 million of general obligation bonds to finance certain projects specified in the 2014 Authorization; and WHEREAS, for the purpose of financing the projects authorized by the 2014 Authorization (the “Projects”), by its Resolution No. 15-19, the District issued General Obligation Bonds, Series 2015, Series A and Series B for the aggregate amount of $45,000,000 pursuant to the Act. By Resolution No. 17-31, the District further issued General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018 for the aggregate amount of $50,000,000; and WHEREAS, Section 5569 of the Public Resources Code provides that, for the purpose of paying all sums coming due for principal and interest on all bonds of the District, there shall be levied and collected each year a tax sufficient to pay the annual interest on such bonds and, also, that part of the principal which will become due before the time for setting the next general tax levy; and WHEREAS, Section 5571 of the Public Resources Code provides that the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, at the time of making the general tax levy in each year, levy a tax upon all the real and personal property within the District and within its respective County at a rate sufficient to meet the proportion of taxes necessary to be raised in the County for the purpose of paying the principal and interest of the bonds and other indebtedness of the District; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, as follows: SECTION 1. Levy of Tax. The Board of Directors of the District hereby determines that the tax rate necessary to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds coming due and payable on September 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, and September 1, 2021 is $0.0015 per $100 of assessed ATTACHMENT 1 Resolutions/2019/19-___SMC Measure AA Levy 2 valuation, and such tax rate shall be and is hereby levied in accordance with all applicable requirements of law. SECTION 2. Collection of Tax. The Controller is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Controller of the San Mateo County, and to the Board of Supervisors of the County, and to take such actions and execute such documents as may be required to cause the tax rate set forth in Section 1 to be placed on the 2020-2021 property tax bill and collected by the County. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on ______, 2020, at a Regular Meeting thereof, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Secretary Board of Directors President Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. District Clerk Resolutions/2019/19-___SCC Measure AA Levy 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20-___ A RESOLUTION OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SETTING THE 2020-21 TAX RATE FOR SANTA CLARA COUNTY ON VOTER APPROVED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the “District”) is a regional open space district that includes territory in each of the County of San Mateo, the County of Santa Clara and the County of Santa Cruz (each, a “County”; collectively, the “Counties”); and WHEREAS, the District is empowered to issue general obligation bonds that are authorized by two-thirds of the qualified electors of the District pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Chapter 3 of Division 5 of the Public Resources Code and Article 4.5, commencing with Section 53506, of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (collectively, the “Act”); and WHEREAS, a special bond election was duly and regularly held in the District on June 3, 2014, for the purpose of submitting a ballot measure to the qualified electors of the District (the "2014 Authorization"), and more than two-thirds of the votes cast at the election approved the issuance of up to $300 million of general obligation bonds to finance certain projects specified in the 2014 Authorization; and WHEREAS, for the purpose of financing the projects authorized by the 2014 Authorization (the “Projects”), by its Resolution No. 15-19, the District issued General Obligation Bonds, Series 2015, Series A and Series B for the aggregate amount of $45,000,000 pursuant to the Act. By Resolution No. 17-31, the District further issued General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018 for the aggregate amount of $50,000,000; and WHEREAS, Section 5569 of the Public Resources Code provides that, for the purpose of paying all sums coming due for principal and interest on all bonds of the District, there shall be levied and collected each year a tax sufficient to pay the annual interest on such bonds and, also, that part of the principal which will become due before the time for setting the next general tax levy; and WHEREAS, Section 5571 of the Public Resources Code provides that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Clara, at the time of making the general tax levy in each year, levy a tax upon all the real and personal property within the District and within its respective County at a rate sufficient to meet the proportion of taxes necessary to be raised in the County for the purpose of paying the principal and interest of the bonds and other indebtedness of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, as follows: SECTION 1. Levy of Tax. The Board of Directors of the District hereby determines that the tax rate necessary to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds coming due and payable on September 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, and September 1, 2021 is $0.0015 per $100 of assessed ATTACHMENT 2 Resolutions/2019/19-___SCC Measure AA Levy 2 valuation, and such tax rate shall be and is hereby levied in accordance with all applicable requirements of law. SECTION 2. Collection of Tax. The Controller is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Controller-Treasurer of the County of Santa Clara, and to the Board of Supervisors of the County, and to take such actions and execute such documents as may be required to cause the tax rate set forth in Section 1 to be placed on the 2020-2021 property tax bill and collected by the County. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on ______, 2020, at a Regular Meeting thereof, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Secretary Board of Directors President Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. District Clerk Resolutions/2019/19-___SCrC Measure AA Levy 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20-____ A RESOLUTION OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SETTING THE 2020-21 TAX RATE FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ON VOTER APPROVED GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the “District”) is a regional open space district that includes territory in each of the County of San Mateo, the County of Santa Clara and the County of Santa Cruz (each, a “County”; collectively, the “Counties”); and WHEREAS, the District is empowered to issue general obligation bonds that are authorized by two-thirds of the qualified electors of the District pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 5500) of Chapter 3 of Division 5 of the Public Resources Code and Article 4.5, commencing with Section 53506, of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (collectively, the “Act”); and WHEREAS, a special bond election was duly and regularly held in the District on June 3, 2014, for the purpose of submitting a ballot measure to the qualified electors of the District (the "2014 Authorization"), and more than two-thirds of the votes cast at the election approved the issuance of up to $300 million of general obligation bonds to finance certain projects specified in the 2014 Authorization; and WHEREAS, for the purpose of financing the projects authorized by the 2014 Authorization (the “Projects”), by its Resolution No. 15-19, the District issued General Obligation Bonds, Series 2015, Series A and Series B for the aggregate amount of $45,000,000 pursuant to the Act. By Resolution No. 17-31, the District further issued General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018 for the aggregate amount of $50,000,000; and WHEREAS, Section 5569 of the Public Resources Code provides that, for the purpose of paying all sums coming due for principal and interest on all bonds of the District, there shall be levied and collected each year a tax sufficient to pay the annual interest on such bonds and, also, that part of the principal which will become due before the time for setting the next general tax levy; and WHEREAS, Section 5571 of the Public Resources Code provides that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz, at the time of making the general tax levy in each year, levy a tax upon all the real and personal property within the District and within its respective County at a rate sufficient to meet the proportion of taxes necessary to be raised in the County for the purpose of paying the principal and interest of the bonds and other indebtedness of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, as follows: SECTION 1. Levy of Tax. The Board of Directors of the District hereby determines that the tax rate necessary to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds coming due and payable on September 1, 2020, March 1, 2021, and September 1, 2021 is $0.0015 per $100 of assessed ATTACHMENT 3 Resolutions/2019/19-___SCrC Measure AA Levy 2 valuation, and such tax rate shall be and is hereby levied in accordance with all applicable requirements of law. SECTION 2. Collection of Tax. The Controller is hereby directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the Auditor-Controller of the County of Santa Cruz, and to the Board of Supervisors of the County, and to take such actions and execute such documents as may be required to cause the tax rate set forth in Section 1 to be placed on the 2020-2021 property tax bill and collected by the County. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on ______, 2020, at a Regular Meeting thereof, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Secretary Board of Directors President Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. District Clerk R-20-73 Meeting 20-14 July 8, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM Review of 2020 State of California Legislative Session – Board of Directors Briefing on Matters of Interest to Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Receive and discuss the 2020 State of California legislative session update from legislative consultants: Public Policy Advocates LLC and Environmental and Energy Consulting. No Board action required. SUMMARY Representatives from Public Policy Advocates LLC (PPA) and Environmental and Energy Consulting (EEC) will provide a legislative briefing on the current 2020 State of California legislative session. The briefing will include an overview of the most significant actions taken during the session, particularly in light of the impacts to the state as a result of COVID-19, and provide predictions for the remainder of the session. The Board of Directors (Board) last received a briefing on the 2019 legislative session on October 24, 2019. DISCUSSION The 2020 Legislative Program, which the Board approved at its February 12, 2020 meeting, reflects Board policy positions on a variety of issues affecting the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District), its mission, and its annual strategic goals. The Legislative Program has guided the determination of priority legislation to track during the year. Staff and the District’s legislative consultants actively use the Legislative Program to communicate District positions on bills, budget recommendations, and other legislative items to the respective authors and/or legislative committees as appropriate. Throughout the 2020 session, staff has fielded time- sensitive requests from partners and monitored evolving pieces of legislation based on Board Policy 1.11 (attachment 1). Legislation deemed a priority by the Board pursuant to this policy is tracked, and, when appropriate, either supported or opposed (attachment 2). COVID-19 and California Shelter-in-Place In response to the rising threat of COVID-19, Governor Newsom initiated a statewide shelter-in- place order on March 19, 2020, effectively shutting down all “nonessential” activities across the state. The State Senate and Assembly initiated a joint recess that concluded May 4 for the Assembly and May 11 for the Senate. Due to the compressed timeline and magnitude of the crisis, both houses have significantly reduced the slate of bills under consideration, which has impacted the list of priority bills promoted by the District. The District’s legislative consultants R-20-73 Page 2 will discuss the outcome of the FY21 budget process and the prospects for legislation for the remainder of the legislative session (Attachment 3). Legislative Categories In addition to their written reports (Attachments 4 and 5), EEC and PPA may discuss legislation and topics including, but not limited to, the following: • California budget • Potential state funding measures • Cap and trade/Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund/Climate change • Wildlife corridors • Water legislation • Wildfire prevention/forest health legislation • Governor’s executive orders and implications • Workers compensation • Other COVID-19-related legislation FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this briefing. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW Legislative updates are periodically brought to the Legislative, Funding, and Public Affairs Committee (LFPAC) throughout each year. The most recent LFPAC review was June 11, 2019. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. No additional notice is required. CEQA COMPLIANCE This item is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. NEXT STEPS The Governmental Affairs Specialist will bring legislative items and proposals to LFPAC and the Board as needed throughout the remainder of the 2020 legislative session. Attachments: 1. Board Policy 1.11, Positions on Ballot Measures and Legislative Advocacy 2. 2020 Priority Bill Legislative Status as of July 1, 2020 3. Amended state legislative calendar 4. EEC Budget Update – June 23, 2020 5. PPA Funding Questions Update – June 23, 2020 Responsible Department Head: Korrine Skinner, Public Affairs Manager Prepared by: Joshua Hugg, Governmental Affairs Specialist Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Board Policy Manual Positions on Ballot Measures and Legislative Advocacy Policy 1.11 Chapter 1 – Administration and Government Effective Date: 4/13/16 Revised Date: N/A Prior Versions: N/A Board Policy 1.11 Page 1 of 3 Purpose To establish a policy governing positions on local and state ballot measures/propositions and state and federal legislative advocacy. It is intended to cover all matters before the Legislature and the voters. Definitions For the purposes of the Positions on Ballot Measures and Legislative Advocacy policy, the following terms and definitions shall be used: Measure – may be included on a municipal, county, or district ballot and includes ordinances, initiatives, referenda, advisory measures, issuance or refunding of bonds, city or county charter amendments, or any other measure or proposition a legislative body may submit to the voters within the body’s jurisdiction. Ballot Proposition – can be a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote. Propositions may be placed on the ballot by the California State Legislature or by a qualifying petition signed by registered voters. Initiative – power of the electors to propose legislation, and to adopt or reject them. Any proposed ordinance may be submitted to the legislative body by means of a petition. Referendum – applies to the process for repealing newly enacted legislation. Within specified time limits, the electors may file a petition protesting the adoption of that legislation. Local Legislation – typically ordinances, which are the laws of a city, charter, or district, often having the force of law, but only within the local jurisdiction. State or Federal Legislation – bills or proposed legislation under consideration by the legislature at the state or federal level. ATTACHMENT 1 Board Policy 1.11 Page 2 of 3 Policy 1. Positions on Matters Before the Voters a. From time to time the Board of Directors may be asked or may desire to take a position on local or state measures. The Board may consider taking a position on the measure/proposition if the measure/proposition: i. Would directly impact the District’s finances, responsibilities, legal authority, or operations; AND ii. Is in line with or inconsistent with the District’s mission and/or commitment to preserve open space within its boundaries and sphere of influence. The Board, by majority vote, may direct the General Manager to research the measure/proposition and return to the Board at a future meeting with information and a General Manager recommendation. At that time, the Board may vote to take a position on a measure/proposition. b. Measures/propositions determined to not impact District business may nonetheless be analyzed by the General Manager when directed by a majority vote of the Board, of which the analysis report would include possible alternatives for Board action, but no position recommendation. 2. Local, State, and Federal Legislative Advocacy a. The Legislative, Funding, and Public Affairs Committee (LFPAC) receives periodic updates regarding the District’s legislative program. When LFPAC determines that proposed legislation may affect District business, it may direct the General Manager to prepare a recommendation for consideration by the full Board or where there is not adequate time to convene the full Board, may direct the General Manager to take action to support or oppose the legislation without full Board approval. In such cases, the General Manager or designee shall report to the Board any actions taken to support or oppose legislation at or before the next Board meeting. b. When time is so short that neither the full Board nor LFPAC can be convened to consider positions to support or oppose local, state or federal legislation, the General Manager is authorized to take a position on behalf of the District if the legislation: i. Is related to the District’s mission; AND ii. Would directly impact the District’s business, such as project delivery, operations, finances, legal authority, or other District responsibilities; AND iii. The position being taken is consistent/inconsistent with existing District policy, past action, or District Strategic Plan; OR iv. The legislation carries other considerations that make it contrary to the District’s interests. In such instances, the General Manager or designee shall report to the Board any actions taken to support or oppose the legislation at or before the next Board meeting. c. Full Board action is required regarding legislation that is not clearly within the criteria listed above under Section 2.b. or guided by direction previously given by LFPAC. ATTACHMENT 1 Board Policy 1.11 Page 3 of 3 3. Full Board action is required to support or oppose any type of grassroots advocacy action, such as social, political, or economic movements, that are not legislation. 4. Board members representing the District in their official capacity on regional or other bodies may, at his or her discretion, take actions based on the principles above consistent with previously approved Board positions and policies. 5. This policy is not intended to limit the prerogative of individual Board members from expressing their individual support for or opposition to any local ballot measure, State proposition, State or Federal legislation, or grassroots advocacy actions. However, in doing so, the member should clearly state they are speaking for themselves, and not in an official capacity on behalf of the Board or the District. Individual Board Members who take a position in support or opposition to ballot measure or legislation for which the Board has not previously taken a position are encouraged as a professional courtesy to include the language for identification purposes only parenthetically following their signature referencing their position on the Board. ATTACHMENT 1 MROSD Legislative Tracking Matrix 7/1/2020 Measure Author Focus Area Goal Topic Status Brief Summary Position Priority AB 2482 Stone, Mark D Climate Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Agriculture: environmental farming programs and grants. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Would require the Department of Food and Agriculture, upon appropriation by the Legislature of additional funds, to administer the State Water Efficiency and Enhancement Program (grant program) to provide grants to agricultural operations to implement irrigation systems that reduce greenhouse gases and energy use and increase water use efficiency, as prescribed. The bill would also require the department to fund culturally competent training on irrigation and nutrient management, authorize the department to contract with qualified third parties to measure grant program outcomes, and require the department to adopt guidelines for the grant program. Support 2 AB 2619 Stone, Mark D Climate Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Coastal resources: Program for Coastal Resilience, Adaptation, and Access. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Would establish the Program for Coastal Resilience, Adaptation, and Access for the purpose of funding specified activities intended to help the state prepare, plan, and implement actions to address and adapt to sea level rise and coastal climate change. The bill would create the Coastal Resilience, Adaptation, and Access Fund in the State Treasury, and would authorize the California Coastal Commission and specified state agencies to expend moneys in the fund, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act, to take actions, based upon the best scientific information, that are designed to address and adapt to sea level rise and coastal climate change, as prescribed. Support 2 AB 2954 Rivas, Robert D Climate Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: climate goal: natural and working lands. Awaiting committee assignment in Senate Rules Would require the State Air Resources Board, in collaboration with the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Natural Resources Agency, the Office of Planning and Research, and other relevant departments, to identify by July 1, 2021, an overall climate goal for the state’s natural and working lands, as defined, to sequester carbon and reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas emissions. As part of this process, the bill would require the state board, in collaboration with the same agencies and departments, to among other things, identify practices, policy incentives, and potential reductions in barriers that would help achieve the climate goal for integration into the next update to the scoping plan that immediately follows the identification of the climate goal and, on or before January 1, 2022, report to the Legislature recommended policy incentives that the state could enact to help reach the climate goal. Support 2 SB 1296 Durazo D Climate Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Natural resources: the Nature and Parks Career Pathway and Community Resiliency Act of 2020. Died in Senate Appropriations Committee Current law establishes various environmental and economic policies and programs.This bill would establish the Nature and Parks Career Pathway and Community Resiliency Act of 2020, which would require state conservancies, the Wildlife Conservation Board, and the Natural Resources Agency to establish independent grant programs to support climate-beneficial and climate resiliency projects that incorporate partnerships with nonprofit organizations that provide certifications and placement services for jobs and careers in the natural resources field, as specified. Support 2 SB 1323 Skinner D Climate Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Carbon sequestration: state goals: natural and working lands: registry of projects. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Would require, no later than July 1, 2021, that the Natural Resources Agency, in coordination with the California Environmental Protection Agency, the State Air Resources Board, and the department establish carbon sequestration goals for natural and working lands, as defined. The bill would require the board to include specified carbon dioxide removal targets as part of its scoping plan. Support 2 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Priority Bill Status as of June 24, 2020 1 ATTACHMENT 2 MROSD Legislative Tracking Matrix 7/1/2020 AB 1922 Rivas, Luz D Education Connect people to open space and a regional environmental protection vision Pupil instruction: science requirements: climate change. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Current law requires the adopted course of study for grades 1 to 6, inclusive, and the adopted course of study for grades 7 to 12, inclusive, to include certain areas of study, including, among others, English, mathematics, social sciences, science, and visual and performing arts, as specified. This bill, with respect to both of the above-referenced adopted courses of study, would require the science area of study to include an emphasis on the causes and effects of climate change. The bill would require that appropriate coursework including this material be offered to pupils as soon as possible, commencing no later than the 2021–22 school year. Support 2 AB 3256 Garcia, Eduardo D Funding Strengthen organizational capacity and long- term financial sustainability to fulfill the mission Climate risks: bond measure. On hold in Assembly Rules awaiting negotiation with Governor The California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018, approved by the voters as Proposition 68 at the June 5, 2018, statewide direct primary election, authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,000,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to finance a drought, water, parks, climate, coastal protection, and outdoor access for all program.This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact a bond measure that would address climate risks to the State of California. Support 1 ACR 179 Voepel R Governance Strengthen organizational capacity and long- term financial sustainability to fulfill the mission Special Districts Week Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership This measure proclaims the week of May 17, 2020, to May 23, 2020, to be Special Districts Week. Support 2 SB 1372 Monning D Habitat Connectivity Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Wildlife corridors and connectivity: Wildlife and Biodiversity Protection and Movement Act of 2020. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Current law requires the Department of Fish and Wildlife, contingent upon funding being provided by the Wildlife Conservation Board or from other appropriate bond funds, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to investigate, study, and identify those areas in the state that are most essential as wildlife corridors and habitat linkages, as well as the impacts to those wildlife corridors from climate change, and requires the department to prioritize vegetative data development in these areas. This bill would additionally require the department to investigate, study, and identify impacts to those wildlife corridors from state infrastructure projects, including transportation and water projects, large-scale development projects not covered by an existing natural community conservation plan or habitat conservation plan, and planned or potential land conversions. Support 1 AB 2987 Flora R Planning and Permitting Strengthen organizational capacity and long- term financial sustainability to fulfill the mission Local agency public contracts: bidding procedures. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership The Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act authorizes a public agency to elect to become subject to uniform construction cost accounting procedures. The act authorizes bidding procedures for public projects, as specified. Those bidding procedures include procedures for the publication or posting and electronic transmission of notice inviting formal bids. This bill would authorize a public agency, as an alternative to the publication or posting requirement, to meet the notice inviting formal bids requirement by transmitting notice electronically, as specified, and publishing the notice electronically in a prescribed manner on the public agency’s internet website at least 14 calendar days before the date of opening the bids. Support 2 AB 3005 Rivas, Robert D Planning and Permitting Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Leroy Anderson Dam and Reservoir: environmental review, permitting, and public contracting. Awaiting committee assignment in Senate Rules Would require the Department of Fish and Wildlife, within 15 days of receipt of the notification from the Santa Clara Valley Water District, to inform the department whether the Anderson Dam project, as defined, will not substantially adversely affect an existing fish and wildlife resource. If the department determines that the project will substantially adversely affect an existing fish and wildlife resource, the bill would specify the process by which the department is to issue a final agreement to the district that includes reasonable measures necessary to protect the affected resource. Support 2 2 ATTACHMENT 2 MROSD Legislative Tracking Matrix 7/1/2020 AB 2373 Rubio, Blanca D Stewardship Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Structural pest control: second generation anticoagulant rodenticides. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Current law provides for the licensure and regulation of structural pest control by the Structural Pest Control Board in the Department of Consumer Affairs. This bill would require a licensee, beginning July 1, 2021, to complete a training course of at least one hour on the ecological impact of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides, as defined, on wildlife with respect to primary and secondary poisoning. The bill would require the training course to be developed by the board or a provider approved by the board, and to meet and apply to the continuing education requirements for licensees established by the board. Support 2 AB 2502 Quirk D Water Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Groundwater sustainability plans: impacts on managed wetlands. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act requires all groundwater basins designated as high- or medium-priority basins by the Department of Water Resources that are designated as basins subject to critical conditions of overdraft to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan or coordinated groundwater sustainability plans by January 31, 2020. The act prescribes that plans contain certain required contents and requires that plans contain, where appropriate and in collaboration with the appropriate local agencies, additional analyses or components, including, among others, control of saline water intrusion, wellhead protection areas and recharge areas, a well abandonment and well destruction program, well construction policies, and impacts on groundwater dependent ecosystems. This bill would add impacts to managed wetlands, as specified, to the additional analyses or components that a plan is required to contain when appropriate. Support 2 AB 2518 Wood D Water Protect the positive environmental values of open space lands Voluntary stream restoration landowner liability. Removed due to COVID-related reduction of bills at the request of leadership Would exempt a landowner who voluntarily allows land to be used for such a project to restore fish and wildlife habitat from civil liability for property damage or personal injury resulting from the project if the project is funded, at least in part, by a state or federal agency that promotes or encourages riparian habitat restoration, unless the property damage or personal injury is caused by willful, intentional, or reckless conduct of the landowner or by a design, construction, operation, or maintenance activity performed by the landowner. Support 2 3 ATTACHMENT 2 2020 TENTATIVE ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR COMPILED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ASSEMBLY CHIEF CLERK Revised 5-6-20 DEADLINES Jan. 1 Statutes take effect (Art. IV, Sec. 8(c)). Jan. 6 Legislature reconvenes (J.R. 51(a)(4)). Jan. 10 Budget must be submitted by Governor (Art. IV, Sec. 12(a)). Jan. 17 Last day for policy committees to hear and report to fiscal committees fiscal bills introduced in their house in the odd-numbered year (J.R. 61(b)(1)). Jan. 20 Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. Jan. 24 Last day for any committee to hear and report to the floor bills introduced in that house in the odd-numbered year. (J.R. 61(b)(2)). Last day to submit bill requests to the Office of Legislative Counsel. Jan. 31 Last day for each house to pass bills introduced in that house in the odd- numbered year (J.R. 61(b)(3)) (Art. IV, Sec. 10(c)). S M T W TH F S 1 2 3 4 Wk. 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wk. 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Wk. 3 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wk. 4 26 27 28 29 30 31 JANUARY FEBRUARY S M T W TH F S Wk. 4 1 Wk. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wk. 2 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Wk. 3 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Wk. 4 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Feb. 17 Presidents' Day. Feb. 21 Last day for bills to be introduced (J.R. 61(b)(4), J.R. 54(a)). MARCH S M T W TH F S Wk. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Wk. 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Wk. 3 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Wk. 4 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Wk. 1 29 30 31 Mar. 3 Primary Election. Mar. 20 Joint Recess begins upon adjournment (A.C.R. 189, Resolution Chapter 15, Statutes of 2020). Mar. 27 Cesar Chavez Day observed. APRIL S M T W TH F S Wk. 1 1 2 3 4 Spring Recess 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wk. 2 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Wk. 3 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wk. 4 26 27 28 29 30 MAY S M T W TH F S Wk. 4 1 2 Wk. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Wk. 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Wk. 3 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Wk. 4 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Wk. 1 31 May 4 Assembly reconvenes from Joint Recess (A.C.R. 189, Resolution Chapter 15, Statutes of 2020). May 22 Last day for policy committees to hear and report to fiscal committees fiscal bills introduced in the Assembly (J.R. 61(b)(5)). May 25 Memorial Day. May 29 Last day for policy committees to hear and report to the floor nonfiscal bills introduced in the Assembly (J.R. 61(b)(6)). *Holiday schedule subject to final approval by Rules Committee.Page 1 of 2 OVER ATTACHMENT 3 2020 TENTATIVE ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR COMPILED BY THE OFFICE OF THE ASSEMBLY CHIEF CLERK Revised 5-6-20 JUNE S M T W TH F S Wk. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wk. 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 No Hrgs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Summer Recess 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Summer Recess 28 29 30 June 5 Last day for fiscal committees to hear and report to the floor bills introduced in the Assembly (J.R. 61 (b)(8)). June 15 Budget Bill must be passed by midnight (Art. IV, Sec. 12(c)). June 15-19 Assembly Floor session only. No committee may meet for any purpose except for Rules Committee, bills referred pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2, and Conference Committees (J.R. 61(b)(10)). June 19 Last day for the Assembly to pass bills introduced in that house (J.R. 61(b)(11)). Summer Recess begins for the Assembly upon adjournment, provided Budget Bill has been passed (J.R. 51(b)(2)). June 25 Last day for a legislative measure to qualify for the Nov. 3 General Election ballot (Elections Code Sec. 9040). JULY S M T W TH F S Summer Recess 1 2 3 4 Summer Recess 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Wk. 3 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Wk. 4 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Wk. 1 26 27 28 29 30 31 July 3 Independence Day observed. July 13 Legislature reconvenes from Summer Recess (J.R. 51(b)(2)). July 31 Last day for policy committees to hear and report fiscal bills to fiscal committees (J.R. 61(b)(13). AUGUST S M T W TH F S Wk. 1 1 Wk. 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wk. 3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 No Hrgs. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 No Hrgs. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 No Hrgs 30 31 Aug. 7 Last day for policy committees to meet and report bills (J.R. 61(b)(14)). Aug. 14 Last day for fiscal committees to meet and report bills (J.R. 61(b)(15)). Aug. 17 – 31 Floor session only. No committee may meet for any purpose except Rules Committee, bills referred pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2, and Conference Committees (J.R. 61(b)(16)). Aug. 21 Last day to amend bills on the floor (J.R. 61(b)(17)). Aug. 31 Last day for each house to pass bills (Art. IV, Sec 10(c), J.R. 61(b)(18)). Final Recess begins upon adjournment (J.R. 51(b)(3)). IMPORTANT DATES OCCURRING DURING FINAL RECESS 2020 Sept. 30 Last day for Governor to sign or veto bills passed by the Legislature before Sept. 1 and in the Governor's possession on or after Sept. 1 (Art. IV, Sec. 10(b)(2)). Oct. 1 Bills enacted on or before this date take effect January 1, 2021. (Art. IV, Sec. 8(c)). Nov. 3 General Election. Nov. 30 Adjournment sine die at midnight (Art. IV, Sec. 3(a)). Dec. 7 2021-22 Regular Session convenes for Organizational Session at 12 noon. (Art. IV, Sec. 3(a)). 2021 Jan. 1 Statutes take effect (Art. IV, Sec. 8(c)). *Holiday schedule subject to final approval by Rules Committee.Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 3 To: Board of Directors, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District From: Environmental & Energy Consulting Date: June 23rd, 2020 Re: California Funding Report California’s funding landscape has completely changed in the last few months as a result of the COVID-19 emergency. The legislature’s budget, funding, and policy priorities have shifted almost completely to respond to the emergency, with a directive to focus all energy and resources only on COVID-19 response, wildfire prevention and response, housing and homelessness, and economic recovery. This, during a time when California anticipates a $54B budget deficit, 18% unemployment rate, and less-than-projected Cap-and-Trade revenues. Despite this depressed financial outlook, Environmental & Energy Consulting (EEC) continues to work to secure funding to advance the following Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) projects: 1) Land Acquisitions: San Jose Water Company, etc. 2) Highway 17 Projects 3) Land Transfer: Cloverdale This memo summarizes the above District projects that we continue to pursue state funding for during Fiscal Year 2020-2021. 1) Land Acquisitions: San Jose Water Company, etc. Budget Request: • Senator Beall previously secured a $10 million General Fund appropriation to the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), to be distributed as grants to the District to acquire lands in the Upper Guadalupe, Los Gatos Creek, and Saratoga Creek from the San Jose Water Company (SJWC). • The existing budget language specifies that the funds are available for encumbrance or expenditure until June 30, 2021, and that the funds must be used to acquire lands from the SJWC. • Due to changing dynamics impacting the planned transactions, EEC worked with Senator Beall to submit and advance a budget re- appropriation request that does the following: 1) Extends the encumbrance period of the funds to June 30, 2025; and 2) Creates more flexibility for eligible land acquisitions. • The Governor’s May Revise did not include Senator Beall’s re- appropriation. On June 15th, the legislature passed SB 74, the Senate and ATTACHMENT 4 Assembly’s negotiated state budget proposal, which included Senator Beall’s re-appropriation request. Because the Governor and legislature had not negotiated prior to the legislature passing SB 74, further budget negotiations would need to be had prior to the three houses finalizing the state budget. • On June 22nd, the legislature and Governor negotiated a final state budget and released their final budget deal, and associated budget bills. The final budget deal includes Senator Beall’s re-appropriation. We are now waiting for the Governor to sign the state budget into law. 2) Highway 17 Projects New Funding: • EEC has been working to advance new, non-General Fund state funds to support the District’s Highway 17 projects. This has been especially important as the state’s General Fund continues to diminish and be renegotiated due to COVID-19. • Working with the District’s legislative delegation, Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia crafted new amendments to his bond, AB 3256, that appropriates $400 million to the Wildlife Conservation Board to, among others, support projects necessary to the protection of wildlife corridors and habitat linkages. • Senator Allen’s bond, SB 45, includes an appropriation of $600 million to the Wildlife Conservation Board to fund, among others, projects to protect and restore wildlife corridors and habitat linkages. • The legislature has until July 26th to pass a bond. Conversations are ongoing to understand if there is an appetite for an economic stimulus bond within the legislature and with California voters. • In parallel, EEC continues to work with other legislative leaders, including Senator Hertzberg, to position the Cloverdale-eligible funds in the case that another state funding package becomes viable. General Fund Request: • EEC worked with Senator Beall to submit a Member Budget Request to appropriate $20 million to Caltrans and the Wildlife Conservation Board to support the District’s Highway 17 projects. • The status of Senator Beall’s budget request is uncertain because conversations related to non-COVID-19 Member Budget Requests are being delayed, and will likely not happen until after the legislature returns from Summer Recess in July or August. It is unlikely that non-COVID-19 Member Budget Requests will be funded this year. Agency Funding: • EEC provided Senator Beall with support to describe how the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) can use Advanced Mitigation funds to support the District’s Highway 17 project. District staff have met with ATTACHMENT 4 Caltrans and the Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) staff to begin the discussion as to the project might be able to utilize these funds. • At the request of Senator Beall’s office, EEC worked with CDFW to request a letter from the department in support of this project that could be sent to Caltrans to encourage their active pursuit of funding for the project. Although the department indicated that they are supportive of wildlife corridors in general, they were unable to publicly express support for the project because their comments could be perceived as their pre-approving a project before the project is officially presented and considered for approval. • Caltrans wrote a letter describing how they are exploring funding options for the District’s project, including all SB 1 funds, and suggested that the Regional Conservation Investment Strategies Program could be an option for funding. • Conversations are ongoing to determine how Caltrans, and other agencies, can find funding for the Highway 17 project. 3) Land Transfer: Cloverdale New Funding: • EEC has been advancing various strategies to secure new, non-General Fund state funds to support the transfer of the Cloverdale property to the District. This has been especially important as the state’s General Fund continues to diminish and be renegotiated due to COVID-19. • With the support of Senator Hill and Assemblymember Berman, and in partnership with Together Bay Area, Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia crafted new amendments to his bond, AB 3256, that increases the appropriation to the State Coastal Conservancy from $300 million to $800 million, increasing the opportunity for the District to successfully attain a grant to support the Cloverdale land transfer. • Senator Allen’s bond, SB 45, includes an appropriation of $700 million to the State Coastal Conservancy to fund projects identified by the conservancy. The District’s Cloverdale land transfer would be an eligible project for these funds. • The legislature has until July 26th to pass a bond. Conversations are ongoing to understand if there is an appetite for an economic stimulus bond within the legislature and with California voters. • In parallel, EEC continues to work with other legislative leaders, including Senator Hertzberg, to position the Cloverdale-eligible funds in the case that another state funding package becomes viable. General Fund Request: • On behalf of Peninsula Open Space Trust, Public Policy Group worked with Senator Hill to submit a formal Member Budget Request requesting $10 million from the General Fund to support the transfer of the Cloverdale property to the District. ATTACHMENT 4 " Due to the state s rapidly changing budget priorities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have heard that non-COVID-19 related Member Budget Requests are not likely be funded this year. We do believe, however, that PPG and Senator Hill are still pursuing this Member Budget Request to the best of their ability. ATTACHMENT 4 June 23, 2020 TO: Ana María Ruiz, General Manager Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Joshua Hugg, MPA, Governmental Affairs Specialist Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District FROM: Russell Noack, Julee Malinowski Ball, Nadra Mamou Public Policy Advocates, LLC RE: District Administration COVID-19 Legislative Issues Local Government Budgets: With the state projected to have a $41 billion shortfall, local governments were concerned the state might have to dip into local coffers to balance their books. To answer this question, we have the benefit of having the final budget being passed out of the Legislature last week. We can say with confidence the state did not dip into the local coffers to balance their books, although the state has the ability to do so. Proposition 1A (2014) says that local property and sales tax revenue is to remain with local governments rather than going into the statewide treasury, except when the governor declares an emergency and 2/3rds of the California State Legislature agrees. Local governments focused their efforts instead on getting financial assistance from the state. The California State Association of Counties (CSAC), along with their affiliate organizations and counties up and down the state, were asking for the state to backfill 1991 Realignment and 2011 Realignment, which are projected to fall $3.3 billion short of their base funding over the current year and budget year. California’s safety-net system is delivered almost entirely by counties —public health, public safety, behavioral health and social services— and is under immense strain from the COVID-19 public health crisis and steep economic recession. The final budget package prioritized relief to maintain the safety net in a severely challenging state budget and will help soften the blow to county programs and services. Although the counties requested $1 billion, the Legislature approved $750 million. Pursuant to Section 8.28 of the Budget Bill, as amendedi, if the state receives an additional $14 billion of flexible federal funding by October 15, 2020, ATTACHMENT 5 Re: District Administration COVID-19 Legislative Issues June 23, 2020 Page 2 of 3 the counties will receive another $250 million. Also, worth noting, budget control language provides this funding is contingent on the county’s certifying compliance with the state’s stay-at-home requirements and health directives including face coverings. The final budget also increased the state’s CARES Act funding allocation to cities to $500 million and established a floor allocation of $50,000 per city. In the Governor’s May Revisionii, the state’s allocation was $450 million and did not provide a minimum allocation for each city. Cities are facing a $7 billion general revenue shortfall. There is no additional funding triggered like the counties if federal money is approved. Landlord/Tenant Stabilization Fund: In the early stages of the budget process, Senate leadership put together a landlord/tenant stabilization fund proposal. This proposal would create a three-party agreement to resolve unpaid rents among renters, landlords and the state. Senator Caballero and Senator Bradford introduced SB 1410 COVID-19 emergency: tenanciesiii. SB 1410 outlines the terms of the tenant-owner rent stabilization agreement, which would protect tenants from eviction during the state of emergency, or for the unpaid rent from the state of emergency. The state of California will pay the unpaid rent in the form of a tax credit and the tenant will repay the state of California by installments over the span of ten years starting in 2024, without interest. Owners of real property are eligible to participate in this program. We are asking for clarity around how public entities qualify as owners of real property. Workers' Compensation - Rebuttable Presumption: In early May, after months of negotiations, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-62-20iv, which created a rebuttable presumption of work-relatedness for COVID-19 illness if the employee tested positive within 14 days of working outside the home at the direction of the employer. The Order lasts until July 5, 2020. Three bills on the subject are also in the legislative process. Senate Bill 1159 (Hill)v would codify the Governor's Executive Order. Assembly Bill 664 (Cooper)vi would create a conclusive presumption for certain public safety and hospital workers. And Assembly Bill 196 (L. Gonzalez)vii would create a conclusive presumption for all essential employees working outside the home and extends the time frame for 90 days. Labor Code Section 3363.5 provides that a person who performs voluntary services for a public agency as authorized by the Governing Body upon adoption of a resolution shall be deemed to be an employee for workers' compensation purposes. It is our understanding that MROSD has adopted such a policy since 1994 and accordingly volunteers fall under the rebuttable presumption of the Executive Order (EO). Despite the negative impact on organizations that utilize a large number of volunteers each working only a few hours, it is not likely that the Governor or Legislature would revise the EO to exclude the presumption for volunteers asked to work outside their homes. Although an uphill fight, working in concert with the California Special Districts Association, MROSD is attempting to see if a broader coalition of districts and nonprofits can be created seeking some relief from legislative leaders and the Newsom Administration. ATTACHMENT 5 Re: District Administration COVID-19 Legislative Issues June 23, 2020 Page 3 of 3 Teeter Plan: Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-61-20viii, which among other things established a property tax penalty waiver program for taxpayers who are unable to pay due to financial hardship beyond their control caused by the COVID-19 crisis. A reduction in penalty payments would negatively affect Teeter Plan Counties as the Teeter Method allows counties to calculate an upfront payment plan to remit payments to special districts with the penalties ultimately remaining with the counties. We have met with representatives of the Treasurer Tax Collector Association, County Assessors Association and CSAC and have received the positive news that the April 10 property tax payments have been remitted as usual and little or no impact has been observed to date. We are closely monitoring the issue with the relevant stakeholder groups to determine if the volume of financial hardship waivers will have a greater impact on delayed property tax payments on the December 10 due date. i Senate Bill 74 (Mitchell), As Enrolled 06/15/2020 ii 2020-21 May Revision to the Governor’s Budget, As Revised on May 14, 2020 iii Senate Bill 1410 (Caballero and Bradford), As Amended 06/19/2020 iv Executive Order N-62-20, Issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on 05/06/2020 v Senate Bill 1159 (Hill), As Amended on 06/18/2020 vi Assembly Bill 664 (Cooper), As Amended on 05/18/2020 vii Assembly Bill 196 (L. Gonzalez), As Amended on 05/05/2020 viii Executive Order N-61-20, Issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on 05/06/2020 ATTACHMENT 5 DATE: July 8, 2020 MEMO TO: Board of Directors THROUGH: Ana Ruiz, General Manager FROM: Julie Andersen, Senior Resource Management Specialist Kirk Lenington, Natural Resources Manager Jane Mark, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Alma Bridge Road Newt Mortality Update SUMMARY In response to a newt mortality issue along Alma Bridge Road, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) staff have participated in ongoing conversations with newt advocacy groups (Sierra Club and Audubon) and researchers (US Geologic Survey and US Davis Road Ecology Center). District staff are also coordinating with partners, including Santa Clara County Roads and Airports (County Roads), Santa Clara County Parks (County Parks), Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST). To date, over 10,000 dead newts have been documented by volunteers on Alma Bridge Road since monitoring began in 2017. District staff reviewed an infrastructure project proposed by newt advocates and researchers to reduce roadkill with County Roads, County Parks, and Valley Water staff. As a result of these discussions, the District is currently working with POST to develop an additional study for review by the stakeholder agencies. Further study will characterize the road mortality relative to long term subpopulation viability and help determine the appropriate scale of any roadway modifications. In addition, staff is evaluating how the Beatty Parking Lot and Trail Connections Project will interface with the studies and future actions to address the newt mortality issue along Alma Bridge Road. DISCUSSION In November 2017, District staff were notified by a District trail patrol volunteer that she had observed ongoing newt roadkill (numbering in the hundreds) along Alma Bridge Road near Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. Staff responded that although concerning, Alma Bridge Road is not owned or managed by the District and therefore our ability to implement actions to address this issue was limited and would require participation of additional partners. Staff discussed the issue with the volunteer to clarify that this work to monitor the roadkill along the roadway is not part of an official District study and contacted local agencies to advise them of the issue. To date, over 10,000 dead newts have been documented by volunteers on Alma Bridge Road since monitoring began in 2017. California newt (Taricha torosa) and rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa) are closely related species, are present in the area, and have both been identified among roadkill on Alma Bridge Road. Neither of the newt species have special protection in this area. The California newt is listed as a California Species of Special Concern in the southern portion of its range (Monterey County and south), which does not include Santa Clara County or District preserves. The rough-skinned newt has no special protection. In November 2018, POST began to further investigate the issue by working with a consultant biologist to analyze existing volunteer data. That effort found that additional study is needed to estimate the adult newt breeding population size and percentage of the population being killed by vehicle strikes. This information was shared with newt advocates, researchers, and agency stakeholders. In February 2019, the Audubon Society and the Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club sent a letter to Supervisor Wasserman and the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors requesting road closures, efforts to reduce traffic (e.g. vehicle shuttles), installation of signage on Alma Bridge Road, and the development of educational materials (see Attachment 1). County Roads responded to this letter indicating they will install signage on Alma Bridge Road, that road closures are not feasible, and that County Parks will educate park users about newt crossings (Attachment 2). Supervisor Simitian’s office also discussed the issue with District Natural Resources (NR) staff. County Roads followed up and has installed numerous newt crossing signs on Alma Bridge Road. The District developed a Frequently Asked Questions document (Attachment 3) to convey our knowledge of and ongoing involvement in raising awareness about the newt mortality issue. This information is available on the District website. In January 2020, the District held a Planning and Natural Resources (PNR) Committee meeting onsite for the Beatty Parking Lot and Trail Connections Project (Beatty Project) and heard comments from Audubon Society regarding concerns about ongoing newt mortality on Alma Bridge Road. District NR staff subsequently participated in a meeting with POST, the newt advocacy groups (Audubon, Sierra Club), and researchers (UC Davis Roadkill Ecology Center, USGS) to discuss data collection, potential mitigation options, and process. Shortly after, in February 2020 the researchers sent a proposal for the use of an elevated roadway and directional fencing to offset newt mortalities in identified roadkill hotspots along Alma Bridge Road. They sent this proposal to County Roads, County Parks, CDFW, Valley Water, the District, and POST. In April 2020, the District met with County Roads, County Parks, and Valley Water to discuss the proposal and intersection with the Beatty Project. During discussions, County Parks and Valley Water indicated they are supportive of a more systematic study of the newt population and noted that multiagency collaboration is needed. The County does not believe it is appropriate to propose changes to the built environment, roadway, or operation and maintenance of the roadway until the effects of mortality on species population can be understood with more clarity. County Roads is not willing to maintain the infrastructure as currently proposed and the General Manager does not recommend the District taking on maintenance responsibility of a county road structure. Valley Water is also interested in additional studies and defining a clear project lead before undertaking any proposals that may impact their operations. In June 2020, UC Davis submitted a pre-proposal to the Wildlife Conservation Board for Proposition 68 funding in the amount of $1,040,000 for the following work: Phase 1 - Develop a plan and mitigation design to reduce herpetofauna mortality within three (3) hotspot areas of Alma Bridge Road, next to Lexington Reservoir, by preventing access to the road surface and allow herpetofauna access to mating habitat in the Reservoir through existing bridge and culvert crossings. Phase 2 - Contingent upon the County’s acceptance of the plan and design, build mitigation within the hotspots and experimentally determine the effectiveness of the approach in order to inform subsequent mitigation phases. Herpetofauna is a catch all phrase that includes reptiles and amphibians, but the mortality of concern is limited to newts. After discussions with District staff, the General Manager recommends continuing to work collaboratively with stakeholder agencies to secure an outside consultant to develop a more focused and systematic study that quantifies impacts of roadkill to the newt population. A research proposal is currently in development for review by the District, POST, Valley Water, County Roads and County Parks prior to an upcoming Planning and Natural Resources Committee Meeting where it will be discussed. If recommended by the Committee, award of funds for a District contribution to the study will then be brought to the full Board. The District is also supportive of continuing to work with the newt advocacy groups and researchers to discuss solutions to the newt roadkill issue. Further study that demonstrates with greater clarity the need and beneficial outcomes of major roadway modifications to protect newts is needed for agencies to consider contributing significant funds towards and/or being willing to install and maintain such roadway modifications in the future. Implementation will require significant funds, equipment, and ongoing staff time to provide environmental review, multi-agency collaboration, ongoing effectiveness monitoring, inspection and maintenance. The General Manager has directed staff to work with stakeholder agencies to explore funding a collaborative multi-agency study for determining the level of impact to the local newt population, and the appropriate scale of roadway modifications needed to ameliorate the ongoing roadkill. Depending on the cost, a future funding agreement may come to the full Board for review and approval at a later date. In addition to ongoing coordination, District has added a newt migration page to the District website, distributes an annual rainy season email to all staff and social media posts to the public asking them to drive slowly during wet weather in areas of newt migration and report any additional areas of observed roadkill. Staff has also provided information on the District grantmaking program and provided permits and information to help support newt research efforts. Furthermore, staff anticipates presenting an update of the Beatty Project to the PNR Committee this summer, 2020. Attachments: 1. February 2019 letter from Audubon Society and the Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club to Supervisor Wasserman and the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors 2. March 2019 Santa Clara County Roads and Airports response to Attachment 1 3. District Frequently Asked Questions document for Alma Bridge Road Newts February 11, 2019 via email Supervisor Wasserman and Board of Supervisors Santa Clara County Re: Newt Mortality At Alma Bridge Road Dear Supervisor Wasserman and members of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Thousands of Pacific newts have been killed by vehicles on Alma Bridge Road, which borders on Lexington Reservoir in the Santa Cruz Mountains. This road cuts between the newts’ upland habitat and the vernal streams and ponds in which they reproduce. The newts must cross this road twice – once on their migration to the ponds to mate, and then again when they return to the highlands. A single vehicle driving along this road can crush dozens of these slow-moving creaturesi. The Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society and the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter have been alerted to this carnage by our members, who are very concerned and very upset. We write to provide you with information and with the hope that you help identify and implement short-term remedies while exploring long-term solutions. Figure 1: Pacific Newts, Alma Bridge Road (photos by Anne Parsons) Santa Clara ValleyAudubon Society Attachment 1 Roadkill Counts: Citizen scientists have been counting the newt roadkill on Alma Bridge Road since November 2017. Roadkill counts are being uploaded to the iNaturalist.org database on a bi-weekly basis: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/pacific-newts-all-lexington-reservoir-area As many as 457 carcasses have been counted on a single day! Since our volunteers do not count every day, we have reasons to believe these numbers under-represent the full carnage on Alma Bridge Road. Figure 2: Wildlife Mortality on Alma Bridge Road Total Dead: 3,001 This season (Fall 2018 to Feb. 10): 2,530 22 data collection days Last season (Fall-Winter 2017-2018): 471 3 data collection days Other roadkill: 16 10 species: deer, frogs, toads, voles, moles Figure 3: Newt mortality by month through February 10, 2019. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Pacific Newt Mortality 2017-2018 2018-2019 Attachment 1 Figure 4: iNaturalist data: Each blue dot indicates a dead newt and the location where its carcass was found. The map (Figure 4) shows the extent of the problem: newts are being killed all along the eastern side of the reservoir – on miles of Alma Bridge Road. While we do not know what the impact of this level of road kill on the newt population of the region, our members care! Pacific newts have a lifespan of 14 years, and so extremely high mortality rates over time could affect our local population negatively. In Southern California, the California Newt (Taricha torosa) has been listed as a species of special concern where similar conversion of land to human uses has resulted in habitat degradation and massive roadkillii. We believe the same may be happening here. Furthermore, even if the impacts to the population were insignificant, we should be doing all we can to reduce this carnage. Who uses Alma Bridge Road? Our observations show the following users: residents of local homes, hikers, bikers, boaters, equestrians, PG&E, Vulcan Materials Co., San Jose Water Co., Los Gatos Rowing Club, Santa Clara County Parks rangers and maintenance staff, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD) rangers, UCSC Puma Project. Attachment 1 Long-term solutions: The Peninsula Open Space Trust is considering a study of population impacts and looking for long term solutions. Other CA communities have faced similar situations and come up with their own solutions (Santa Cruz Countyiii , Tilden Parkiv, Stanfordv). Lessons learned from these projects suggest it could take time to do the analysis and implement appropriate mitigations. Therefore, we ask the County to identify and implement Short-term solutions: We ask for critical, immediate relief until long-term solutions are found. Here are a few suggestions: • We think Alma Bridge Rd. could be closed at night (5pm-7am) from Highway 17 to Soda Springs Road on a temporary basis from December through March. A gate can be installed for emergency vehicle access. Residents have an alternate route to get to their homes. • Explore ways to reduce vehicle traffic to County Park and to the Rowing Club (for example, shuttles). • Install signage and develop education materials for users of the road We thank you for your attention. For additional information of if you have questions, please contact Shani Kleinhaus at 650-868-2114. Respectfully, Shani Kleinhaus, Ph.D. Environmental Advocate Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Katja Irvin Conservation Committee co-chair Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter i Traffic is Driving a Newt Massacre in the Santa Cruz Mountains, (Bay Nature, 2/8/2019) https://baynature.org/2019/02/06/traffic-is-driving-a-newt-massacre-in-the-santa-cruz- mountains/ ii Taricha torosa, the California newt, is currently a species of California Special Concern in southern CA (IUCN Red List Species Account): https://amphibiaweb.org/cgi/amphib_query?where-genus=Taricha&where- species=torosa&account=iucn iii Hobbs, Michael Thomas, "Amphibian Mortality on Roads: A Case Study in Santa Cruz Long- toed Salamander Habitat" (2013). Master's Theses. 4389. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4389 Attachment 1 This study recommended measures to reduce road mortality to the Santa Cruz long-toed salamander by (1) restricting vehicular traffic on roads dissecting salamander habitats, (2) installing structures to protect the animals while crossing roads, and (3) potentially assisting animals crossing roads at nighttime during the breeding migrations. For a synopsis, see Discussion (p. 45) and Recommendations (p.50). iv South Park Drive in Tilden Park closed for 5 months to protect newts: https://www.berkeleyside.com/2018/11/08/south-park-drive-in-tilden-park-closed-for-5-months- to-protect-newts v Tunnel of love for Stanford's salamanders / Breeding amphibians offered way to escape commuters' cars: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Tunnel-of-love-for-Stanford-s-salamanders-2883540.php CC: Neal Sharma, Peninsula Open Space Trust Terris Kasteen, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Julie Andersen, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Anne Parsons, Citizen Science Volunteer Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society staff and volunteers Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter staff and volunteers Attachment 1 County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports Department IOI Skyport Drive San Jose, California 9st lGl3o2 l-40a-573-2400 March 8,2OL9 Shani Kleinhaus, Ph.D. Environme nta I Advocate Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society Katja lrvin Conservation Committee co-chair Sierra Club Loma Príeta Chapter Re: Newt Mortality on Alma Bridge Road Dear Ms. Kleinhaus and Ms. lrvin, This is in response to your letter dated February IL,2OL9 to Supervisor Wasserman and the members of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors regarding newt mortality on Alma Bridge Road. We appreciate the commitment of the Audubon Society and the Sierra Club to effectuate a long-term solution to this issue and look forward to working with your organizations to that end. Your letter recommends a number of short-term solutions for the County to consider. Our response is as follows: a a Signage and educational material - We have developed a customized sign and propose to install it as shown on the enclosed map. We would appreciate if your organizations could take the lead on development of educational material that we can disseminate to the road users. Nighttime closure of Alma Springs Road - Unfortunately, the road closure is not feasible as a short-term solution. Legal issues, operational capacity of the County staff to open and close the road, coordinating with property owners and public safety concerns would all need to be addressed prior to considering any access restrictions. Reduction of traffic to the park and Rowing Club - We have coordinated this response with our County Parks Department, and they have committed to educating the Rowing Club and park users regarding an awareness of newt movements and crossings. The newt crossing signs and educational materials will help with general awareness of the public and park users. a Board of Supervisors: Mike Wasserman, Cindy Chavez, Dave Cortese, Susan Ellenberg, S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Jelfrey V. Smith ñ 7407 Attachment 2 We appreciate your efforts in bringing this matter to our attention and hope your plan to study a long-term solution will yield a course of action that we can partner to implement. lf you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Best Regards, Director & Airports CC: Neal Sharma, Peninsula Open Space Trust Terris Kasteen, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Julie Andersen, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Anne Parsons, Citizen Science Volunteer County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors 2 Attachment 2 Attachment 2 Alma Bridge Road Newts Frequently Asked Questions 1. Is Midpen aware of the newt mortality issue on Alma Bridge Road? Yes. Although Midpen is not the underlying landowner of Alma Bridge Road, we are aware of and concerned about the issue. We are supportive of volunteer and outside organizations and agencies efforts to collect data and study the road mortality issue. Midpen will utilize this information during California Environmental Quality Act review of projects occurring near Alma Bridge Road. 2. What is Midpen doing to alleviate the issue? When Midpen was notified of the issue, Midpen reached out to the following organizations and agencies to raise awareness of the issue: • Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST), Wildlife Linkages Program Manager • California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Biologist and Statewide Reptile and Amphibian Coordinator • Santa Clara County Parks, Natural Resources Program and Director • Santa Clara Valley Water District Regional Biologists and Water Utility Manager • Santa Clara County Roads and Airports, Transportation Planner In addition, Midpen staff has shared information with the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors office on the issue. Midpen also maintains a newt migration webpage: www.openspace.org/newts 3. What studies are being conducted? An outside biological consultant has been retained to study the issue. In 2019, the consultant will be working on assessing available citizen science data, attempting to better understand the local newt population, potential reproduction, and how observed mortality may affect the population. 4. What is the protection status for local newts? Roadkill newts on Alma Bridge Road have been identified to the genus (Taricha, within which are four identified species, all occurring in the western coastal region of North America). The Alma Bridge Road newts have not been identified to species and are either California newt (Taricha torosa) or rough skinned newt (Taricha granulosa) as the two species appear very similar. The California newt is listed as a California species of special concern in the southern portion of its range, which does not include Santa Clara County and the rough skinned newt has no special protection. Attachment 3 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District openspace.org 5. What can I do to help local newts? Do not attempt to pick up and relocate newts crossing the road; it is dangerous for you and other drivers for you to be on the roadways. Newts also secrete a powerful neurotoxin in their skin that can cause death if ingested. Do not handle newts. Stay off wet roads especially during the breeding season (November to March) and if you must drive, minimize your number of trips, drive slowly and carefully. Alert your friends and neighbors to slow down and drive carefully on Alma Bridge Road when newts are on the move between November and March. If feasible, please reduce the driving occurrences on Alma Bridge Road during these times. Report observations of large newt migrations and/or mortality events using iNaturalist: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/midpen-biodiversity-index Photo credit: California Newt, Karl Gohl. Attachment 3