HomeMy Public PortalAbout19800915 4.11.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15 1980
. . ..n.u..........�.
Mayor Hartsfield presided.
Prayer offered by Rev. George Braden of the Wesley Methodist 1
Church.
;: Councilmen present : Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon, Hequembourg, ;
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.
Councilmen absent : None.
r, A quorum was declared present . ;1
4
4
Public A Public Hearing was held on the Urban Renewal Plan of the 1#
Hearing LaSalette Urban Renewal Project .
No one appeared in opposition to the Project. Mr. Ted Herron
Housing Authority, explained the Project and agreed to answer any 3
questions.
Public A Public Hearing was held on the rezoning request from Landwehr
1.
Hearin Enterprises , Inc. , to rezone a
Hearing p , portion of Landwehr Hills Sub-
Idivision , Section 11 , from RS-2 (single family) to C-4 (planned
commercial) . i
No one appeared in opposition. Mr. Louis Vetter of Central
Missouri Professional Services appeared and explained the rezoning.
s
4
.1
Public A Public Hearing was held on the 1981 Fiscal Year Budget for the ii
Hearing City. q
No one appeared on the matter. ,
1
Opening of The following bids were received for the painting of five used }4
Bids school buses:
Capitol City Ford $5,500. 00
III i Fischer' s Sales 0,213. 00
Turner Auto Service 4 , 375. 00
It was the recommendation of Marty Bros°, Public Works Department ,
that we accept the low bid of Turner Auto Service, in the amount of
$4, 375.00.
Councilman Whitecotton made the motion that such bid of
Turner Auto Service, Linn , Missouri , in the amount of $4 ,375. 00 , ,
! be accepted. Motion seconded by Councilman Crader and passed.
Approval of , The minutes of the Council Meeting of September 2, 1980, the City
Council Administrator' s Report , and the following minutes of the Finance
Minutes, Ad- Committee, were presented:
ministrator y Meeting of the Finance Committee held Monday , September 8 , 4I
Report , and ;; 1980, in the Council Chamber, with Councilman Brant presiding;
Finance Corn- others present were Councilmen Borgmeyer, Crader , Gordon,
mittee Report' Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger and Wade. Also present were Darrell
Wattenbarger, Mike Bates, Tom Benton , Marty Arose and Jim Hartley.
Councilman Whitecotton absent with leave.
The first item of business discussed was additional ap-
propriation requests from various Departments - these were for billz
which accrued in October, paid in November, 1979, and actually due
out of the previous year's budget . The totals were as follows :
Police Department $46, 142.00
7V,.40q(b Fire Department 7,418.00
` f , Engineering Division 7,250.00
')'`a t�':4 ' ■ Street Division 8,576.41
c.{c,), Central Maintenance 37,000.00
Transit Division 20, 353.38
Sewer Division 80, 350.00
Parking Authority 8, 574.70
Parking Garage 355.55 I
Councilman Prenger made the motion that such appropriations be
approved. Motion seconded by Councilman Kliegel and passed.
III
1
1
t yq f
4. 12
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING,TNG, SIPTEbBER 15 ,,,/
•
The next item of buniness was the dte;cunsion regarding
=<z. { raising the minimum on advertising for sealed bids. Mr. Watten-
tbarger suggested the minimum for sealed bids be raised to $3 ,500.004'
> ' t It was also suggested that sealed bids could be requested on ,
such amounts but the Council' s approval could still be asked on
purchases of lesser amounts , without sealed bids. In any event the
Ordinance would probably have to be changed.
After a general discussion it was determined to leave the
1 matter stand as is for the present and Mr. Wattenbarger and Mr.
Hartley were asked to return to the Committee with a proposal as to
show the matter could best be handled, to meet the requirements as
idiscussed tonight .
1i Councilmen Borgmeyer and Hequembourg stated they would like
more information on the present budget - the original requests and
what was cut by the Mayor - and an explanation , a summary , as to
, " what the appropriations were to be used for. Mr. Wattenbarger
! explained that they were voluminous but the Councilmen could have
!; copies of whatever they wished. Councilmen Borgmeyer and Hequem-
'`: s` bourg requested copies . It was understood that Mr. Wattenbarger
and Mr. Hamburg would be present for all Budget sessions.
:fs
Ij The other matter for discussion on tonight 's Agenda was
various fee increases for services rendered by the City , and this
was held over until a later date, considering the fact that there
was no rush since the Hancock Amendment would not be on the ballot
in November.
Mr. Wattenbarger advised that the Auditors from Peat , Marwick,
Mitchell and Company would return in September for two or three day+
and review the records , to see that things are being done in ac-
lcordance with the schedule.
Motion for adjournment .
Respectfully submitted, Thomas R. Brant , D,P. M. , Chairman.
' Councilman Whitecotton made the motion that the Counci..l. Minutes and;'
Ithe two reports be approved as received. Motion seconded by Council-
man Hequemhourg and passed.
The Minutes of the Parking and Traffic Authority , Memorial Airport Minutes
' Commission and Planning and Zoning Commission were received and filed.
filed.
Mayor Hartefield than called on Betty Jo Dohong , who Introduced
Bob Simondet , to explain the Budgetary foqueet from the Commission Planting of
on Environmental Quality , regarding the Monroe Strout I3oautif1- ; trees on
cation, by the planting or Norway Maple trees , approximately ! Monroe St .
twenty-five foot apart on Monroe Street between Stale Street and
the Expressway. The total amount for 95 trees, as requested, in
$35,600.00. An alternate bid for 41 trees would be in the amount "
of $16,900. 00.
After discussion and answering of questions , Councilman
Whitecotton made the motion that the amount of $35 ,600. 00 be ap-
proved for payment out of unappropriated fund balance, for the
following expenditure :
95 trees 0 $100. 00 $ 9,500. 00
Freight on 95 trees 1 ,500.00 i!
56 trees in pavement @ $300. 00 16 ,800.00 jj
39 trees in earth C $200. 00 7,800. 00
$35 ,600. 00 !1
Motion seconded by Councilman Brant and
Y passed by the following
Roll Call vote:
Councilmen voting Aye: Brant , Gordon, Hequembourg, Wade
and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay: Borgmeyer, Crader, Kiiegel and
Prenger. fy
1
Mayor Hartsfield announced that the appointments
ppointments of Mrs. Norma i Appointments
Miller and Mr. John Finch on the Parking and Traffic Authority had 1 Parking and
expired, and he was asking for confirmation on their reappointments ; Traffic
to a full three-year term. Authorit
Councilman Brant made the motion that such appointments be
1
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1980 '
l`�H ♦ts'an"w.«:l YtrYtHa ....W:Sti..:+.zl:.ut-1^Y:are:::1:.tx.,..«.a,_s:.., i...........:::...i........•.x,..s......are-.i'.•...i.....a r....., t.rx...a...:.^r,'::<..'..... .,..a.. .._r.:a.w...... J..:.-._:..1.•n%...:.:un:::.awl..v.r...r.W..w.e.Y....+.'nt9.ruWgYVNaf.,rMalwl 1
'confirmed. Motion seconded by Councilman Gordon and passed.
i-`:` Resig- 'Mayor Hartsfield advised that he had received resignations from
nations Plan- jJudge Houser and Mrs. Margaret Noblin , from the Planning and Zoning
ping and ",Commission. Their replacements would be made at a later date. t,
Zoning Commis-4I 1
sion. i
II i
,Mayor Hartsfield reminded the Council , City Administrator and City
''Attorney of the Retreat or planning work session scheduled for
Retreat 'September 27th, Saturday, starting at nine o' clock, at the Lake of
';the Ozarks. The Media is invited but if any subjects come up, like I,
:personnel or real estate , we will observe the same rules as Council
meetings, of closed session for that item. Mr. Hequembourg will
j'coordinate the car pooling, etc. rI
,t t
;,The Dedication Ceremony for the Thomas E. Whitecotton Law Enforce-
;.. Dedication 'ment Center will be held on Saturday, October 11th, at 1 : 30 p.m.
% , Whitecotton Imith Clarence Kelly, former F.B. Z . Director, as the guest speaker.
Center. lice was requesting the Councilmen and Department Heads to reserve
','this time, until three or four o' clock, for the event.
III Payment 'lMayor Hartsfield advised that we had received the State's payment t
Received fin the amount of $22,000.00 for the services contract , for July 1 , ;I
from State. II1980, to June 30, 1981, and the contract calls for renegotiation
, for the period starting July 1 , 1981.
I
Bill Na. 99 `'13111 No. 99, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled : ,
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , authorizing the !
Agreement- Mayor and Clerk of the City to execute an agreement with the
State Social 'Missouri Department of Social. Services, Division of Aging, for 1 Services ;,transpor;:ation services for residents of Cole County. " ,
Trans- i Bill No. 99 was read first and second time by title and on r1
parta-
Lion. ;'request of Councilman Brant the rules were suspended and the Bill t
'was road the third time by title, placed on final passage and was
;',passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9498: I
(! Councilmen voting Aye : Borgmoyor, Brant , Cruder, Gordon , ;I
Iioquombourg, Kliegol , Prongor, II
Wade and Whitecotton. ;1
Councilmen voting Nay : None. ;?
' Councilmen absent : None. y
Bill No. 100 j13111 No. 100, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled: 1
Amending f "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , amending the j
License Code of the City of Jefferson , 1978, by amending Chapter 22-8,
Chapter. :entitled "Licenses for Businesses, etc. , for which no license j
otherwise specified" by adding an exemption clause. "
Bill No. 100 read first and second time by title and ordered ;'
distributed to members of the Council. i
1
t
Bill No. 101 Bill No. 101, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled:
Amending "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , amending the Code !
License of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by amending Chapter 22-7, entitled
Chapter. "Business Licenses based upon set fees" by the addition of a licens4
for water service and by deleting license for telephone service lonO
distance. "
Bill No. 101 read first and second time by title and ordered :;
distributed to members of the Council.
I, u
Bill No. 102 !!Bill No. 102, introduced by Councilman Whitecotton, entitled: 1
Contract with "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , authorizing and
Moon Con- 1directing the Mayor and Clerk of the City to execute a written !
struck 'contract with William H. Moon, doing business as Moon Construction t
tion ;Company, for gates and operators at the Thomas Whitecotton Law
Gates- :Enforcement Center. " I
Police Statio . Ii
II
i
I
„ .-st s,:.,,
,.” 4. 1 t1
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15 1980
Bill No 102 was read first and second time by title and on
request of Councilman Whitecotton the rules were suspended and the ''
Bill was read the third time by title, placed on final passage and
was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9499 :
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon,
Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger,
Wade and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay : None.
Councilmen absent None. !_
I Bill No. 104, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled: Bill 104.
1 "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri , changing, amending Rezoning
and modifying the zoning map of the City of Jefferson, by amending Landwehr
Chapter 36 of the Code of the City of Jefferson, by rezoning a Hills.
I portion of Landwehr Hills Subdivision , Section Eleven , from RS-2
I (Single Family) to C-4 (Planned Commercial) .
Bill No. 104, read first and second time by title and
ordered distributed to members of the Council .
I Bill No. 105, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled : Bill 105
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri , appropriating Appropriating
money out of unappropriated fund balance of the General Fund, to
various departments. " Monies.
Bill No. 105 read first and second time by title and ordered
distributed to members of the Council.
Bill No. 106 , introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled:
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , amending the Coda Bill 106
of the City of Jefferson , 1978, by amending Section 23-51( e) es- Speed Limit
• tabliuhing a speed limit of forty miles per hour on Stadium Boule- on
yard West , between Frog Hollow Road and Missouri Boulevard. " Stadium West.
Bill No. 10E3 read first and second time by title and ordered
distributed to members of the Council .
Bill No. 78 , introduced by Councilman Grader and Borgmeyer ,
entitled: Bill 78.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , authorizing 'Contract with
and directing the Mayor and City Clerk of the City to execute a Schanzmoyers.
written contract with Patrick L. Schanzmeyer and Thrasilla E. (sewer)
Schanzmoyor, his wife; Gilbert J . Schanzmoyor and Helen M. Schanz-
1' his wife; Bernard A. Schanzrneyer and Norma Jean Schanzmeyer,
his wife , for the construction of a sanitary sewer facility to
I serve the Southridge Drive and Meadow Lake Drive area. "
Bill No. 78 road the third time by title and placed on
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
No. 9500:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon,
Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger,
Wade and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay : None.
Councilmen absent None.
Bill No. 84 , introduced by Councilman Borgmeyer, entitled : Bill 84.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri authorizing and 'Contract with
directing the Mayor and City Clerk of the City to execute a writ- f` Schepker.
ten contract with Frank F. Schepker, Robert F. Schepker, John B. E; (Stadium Blvd
Schepker, and Alice A. Wekenborg for right-of-way for construction;;
of the extension of Stadium Boulevard Central . "
Bill No. 84 read the third time by title and placed on final.
passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9501;
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon,
Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger,
li
Wade and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay : None.
Councilmen absent None. III
J } 41_
, _ ` REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15 , 1980
3. .cr ++, ..,. .. _ ..a+:a,. •.a.�,«.,....a,.,., ....,. .-...............,,.,..._.,......,......,..-.•................ . ..._._ ... _.. .........-. .._. ..._. ..,..._...,.�..........�..ax,...«.._.. ,,.:�.x....
?Y,xfc Bill i Bill No 85, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled :
r, 3 ' q ,n
a�i:�,t , ' 85. j' "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri, authorizing the
? ` Change Mayor and Clerk of the City to execute Change Order Request No 3
yts r' '= -Order 3, on the original contract with Reintjes Waterproofing Company, for
l',:'-, Parking Parking work on the City Parking Garage. "
<'.,.;t,,,..J= Garage. Councilman Hequembourg had previously requested further in-
, 0 formation about this work on the Garage and the performance bond, j
54 which information he felt should be available before voting on this '
' l; Bill. The City Attorney stated some of the information had • -:.f
{ obtained but not all of it
The Bill was placed on the Informal Calendar. y{
Bill 86. Bill No 86 , introduced by Councilman Crader, entitled: j
- Agreement ' "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri authorizing and
:r.o, Highway hwa y directin g the Mayor and City Clerk of the City
to execute a written
and Trans- '. Agreement on behalf of the City with the Missouri Highway and Transµ
flm ortation portation Commission for a grant to improve a General Public Trans-j'
.t >==;,; �,; Grant . _ portation Project to be funded under Section 18 of the Urban Mass
r. Transportation Act of 1964 as amended. "
42;: :;:x'., Bill No 86 read the third time by title and placed on final
?}_ passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No 9502 : ;
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon ,
Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger, Wade, :,
and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay : None. '
': Councilmen absent None.
1` M!
Bill 87. ! Bill No. 87, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled:
No Parking j "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri , amending the code;
Mesa Avenue. i! of the City of Jefferson , 1978, by adding "Mesa Avenue, for a
. Histance of 135 feet on the North side thereof , near Holiday Drive"
to Section 23-79 (a) , relating to parking prohibited at all times
at designated locations.
Bill No. 87 road the third time by title and placed on final :'
passage and was passed by the following vote are Ordinance No. 9503 :
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmoyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon ,
Kliegel , Prongor , Wade and White- ,
;: cotton . I
Councilman voting Nay : Uoquembour.g.
' Councilmen absent None.
t
Bill 88. ,> Bill No. 88, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled:
Setting Tax f' "An Ordinance providing for the levy of city taxes and establishing,°
Rate. the rate of taxation for the City of Jefferson , Missouri , for the
year 1980. "
Bill No. 88 read the third time by title and placed on finale
-, !; passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9504 : (
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon , i'
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and White- d
It cotton. !i
H Councilman voting Nay: Hequembourg. ,11 j
Councilmen absent None. 0
Bill 89. ! Bill No. 89, introduced by Councilman Whitecotton , entitled: q�
Contracts ; "An Ordinance by which the City of Jefferson, Missouri, contracts
Fire Dept. Oath the Cities of Argyle, Cedar City , Freeburg, Linn, Holts
with ; Summit , Ashland, California, Mokane, New Bloomfield, Russellville, a
various ; Meta, Eugene, St. Thomas, Taos, Westphalia, Eldon, Centralia, Mexico ,
cities, etc. ' Columbia, Fulton, Moberly, Boonville, Departments of Cole County,
Centertown, Apache Flats, Fire Protection Districts of Boone County ,
(1Missouri Department of Conservation, and Missouri National Guard,
a11 in the State of Missouri , subject to the acceptance provision ,
therein for the operation and interchange of services of the res-
pective fire departments in case of a major conflagration or dis-
aster. "
Bill No. 89 read the third time by title and placed on finals
{ passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9505: d
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon ,
j Hequembourg, Kliegel, Prenger, Wade 1
and Whitecotton.
ii
Councilmen voting Nay: None. ;,
1 Councilmen absent ; None. 1'
1
4.1.f�
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 15, 1980
Bill No 90, introduced by Councilman Kliegel , entitled:
=° "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri , amending Ordinance
8356 as amended by Ordinance 8698 granting a franchise for cable Bill 90
television service by changing the rates charged to customers as ,Cable
`"t' set forth in paragraph 14 of said Ordinance. " Television
Bill No. 90, read the third time by title and placed on Rate.
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No
9506: ,:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon , .
Hequembourg, Kliegel , Prenger, Wade
and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay : None.
Councilmen absent None. ,
iif
j1
Bill No. 91 , introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled:
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , amending Ordinance Bill 91 .
8356 as amended by Ordinance 8698 and Ordinance granting Cable
a franchise for cable television service by changing the rates ; Television
charged to customers as set forth in paragraph 14 and by repealing ' Rate
Section 18 and enacting a new section 18 in lieu thereof. " (2nd increase
Councilman Brant stated that he was requesting the Bill be
withdrawn, at the request of T.C. I . Cablevision , Inc. , and they
would come back to us at a later date, before the date the Fran-
- chise expires , which is April of 1981.
Bill No. 92 , introduced by Councilman Wade , entitled: ,
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , accepting and Bill 92
approving the plat of Timber Bills Subdividion , Section Four, a .Accepting
1 subdivision of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , as herein des- Plat of
cribod." Timber Hills
Bill No. 92 read the third time by title and placed on Section Four.
• final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No
, 9507:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Cruder, Gordon ,
}toquembourg, Kliegel , Prenger, Wade
and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay : None. is
Councilmen absent None.
Bill No. 93, introduced by Councilman Cruder, entitled: iI
"An Ordinance levying and assessing a special tax bill against th(02411 93.
lots or tracts of land fronting and abutting on the roadway of Tax Bills
Algoa Road, Landwehr Lane and North Grant Street in the City of Algoa Road
Jefferson, Missouri, for the improvements of said roadway. " : Landwehr
1 I3111 No. 93 read the third time by title and placed on ,N. Grant .
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
No. 9508:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Cruder, Gordon, ;;
Hequembourg, Kliegel , Prenger, Wade
and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay: None.
Councilmen absent None. 11
1i
ii
o
Bill No. 94, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled: If
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , amending the code Bill 94.
of the City of Jefferson, 1978, repealing Article V, Chapter 32-531" Sewer
through 32-63 and enacting a new Article V, Sections 32-53 through ; Service
32-69, prescribing and fixing rates and charges for the use of ;' Charges.
• public sewers and the sewerage system of the City of Jefferson ,
Missouri , requiring payment of such rates and charges , and con-
taining a savings clause, and also repealing Ordinance 8506 and r
8825. "
Councilman Brant requested that the Bill be placed on the "'
Informal Calendar and Mr. Hamburg explained that information pre- ;;,
viously requested by Councilman Kliegel had not all been obtained.'
r
• it
I
•. ,�
d..■
r a '..' ,'r ,. tTd-'%aaG,-wr;. .. n.��... .e..^t.5.„ r ..
1
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1980
ri I3i11 No. 95 , introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled : �1
* "An Ordinance providing for industrial cost recovery by the City
R y y
Bill of Jefferson , Missouri , in connection with the Jefferson City
..;1.
95. Waste Treatment Works Construction Projects and creating a new
Industrial Article VI - Industrial Cost Recovery , Sections 32-70 through
= Cost Recovery. Sections 32-79. "
(Sewer) Councilman Brant requested that the Bill be placed on the
Informal Calendar, for the same reasons as Bill No. 94 was being
held over. There was no objection.
Bill 96. Bill No. 96 , introduced by Councilman Whitecotton , entitled :
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson , Missouri , repealing
Animal Chapter Six relating to the keeping of dogs, cats and other
r Control domestic animals and relating to the same subject matter. " ,
Ordinance Councilman Prenger referred to Section 14 , paragraph (a)
and made the motion that the words and figures "ninety-six (96)"
be changed to "seventy-two (72)" as the redemption period. This '
change was made with the understanding that the employees at the
Shelter could use their discretion , over long weekends , or certain :
periods when longer redemption periods were necessary , the animals;
could be held over the 72 hour period. It was determined this
flexibility could be allowed the Director. Mr. Benton explained t4
that was the only reason he knew why the change had been made but
if any of the members present wished they could discuss it further ±
at this time. Motion seconded by Councilman Whitecotton and
passed.
Councilman Hequembourg then made the motion that the Bill
'; be further amended - Article 1 , Section , by changing the period
( . ) to a comma ( , ) and adding the words "by a practicing licensed
, veterinarian. " , at the end of the sentence "Vaccination-Regis-
, tration. The vaccination for rabies and issuance of an appropriate;
certificate. " . Also in Article IX , Section 1 ( a) , add the same
'
word') "by a practicing licensed veterinarian" between the words 1
"secured" and "and" . The motion wan seconded by Councilman
Borgmoyor and paused.
Ci. ty At:torney Graham t;hen requested a correction in the€
Ordinance, immediately following the Ordination clause, which
would read as follows :
"Section 1 . Chapter 0 of the Code of the City of Jefferson ,
1078 , is hereby repealed and a now Chapter 6 enacted in
1.ieu thereof , to road an follows :
Thin correction was agreeable.
The Mayor and Mr. Benton asked it there were any further
suggestions or corrections. There were none and Mr. Benton stated ;, ,
he felt that the passage of thin Ordinance, as amended, was a step
in the right direction , and he felt that if there were any further !'
programs necessary the Council would have an open year.
Bill No. 96, as amended, then read the third time by title
and placed on final passage and was passed by the following vote 1
as Ordinance No. 9509 :
'` Councilmen voting Aye: Brant , Crader, Gordon, Hequembourg ,
Kliegel , Prenger, Wade and
Whitecotton.
Councilman voting Nay: Borgmeyer.
{{!� Councilmen absent None.
Resolution The following Resolution was introduced: ,
� g
Urban Renewal }, Resolution of the City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri',
LaSalette ( approving the Urban Renewal Plan for the LaSalette Area.
Area. Sf WHEREAS, under the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Law of
Ithe State of Missouri , Chapter 99. 300 - 99.660 of the revised
statutes (herein referred to as "Chapter 99") . The City of
`' Jefferson is authorized to through its Housing Authority take cer-
tain steps in the elimination and prevention of the spread of slumsI
�, and urban blight through the planning and undertaking of urban I
III renewal projects; and ;
WHEREAS, it is provided in Chapter 99 that the Urban Renewal'
( Plan for the respective project area be approved by the governing
body of the locality in which the project is situated and that such
ii
III !
,l
1
. .,
41.8
_ REGULAR COUNCI L_MEETI 1.G_,_ SEPTEMBER 15 . 1980.
. ..
approval include findings by the governing body that : ( 1) the ii
Urban Renewal Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent !!
with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for the rehabili-
tation or redevelopment of the urban renewal area; (2) the Urban ,
Renewal Plan conforms to a general plan for the development of the
locality as a whole; and (3) the Urban Renewal Plan gives due
consideration to the provision of adequate park and recreational
areas and facilities, as may be desirable for neighborhood im-
provement , with special consideration for the health, safety , and
welfare of children and elderly residing in the general vicinity
of the site covered by the Plan ; and
WHEREAS , it is desirable and in the public interest that
1 the Housing Authority of the City of Jefferson (herein called the
"Local Public Agency") undertake and carry out the urban renewal
project (herein called the "Project") identified as "The LaSalette
Project" and encompassing the area bounded as follows :
Beginning at the southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 12, thence N 02
degrees 18' 49" E along the Quarter Quarter Section Line,
672.97 feet to a point on the west line of Lot No. 1 of
said City View Terrace; thence S 89 degrees 05' 24" E,
98.20 feet to a point on the south line of Linden Drive;
thence N 52 degrees 42' 47" W, 51. 32 feet to the most
southerly corner of Lot No. 12 of said Panorama Hills; Resolution
thence N 37 degrees 19' 45" E along the easterly line of Urban Renewal
said Lot No. 12, 15. 00 feet ; thence N 89 degrees 06 ' 47" ;'LaSalette
W. 64. 56 feet to the Quarter Quarter Section Line; thence Area.
N 02 degrees 33' 54" E, along the Quarter Quarter Section
Line, 678. 35 feet to the Northeast corner of the Southwest i;.
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 12; thence
N 87 degrees 04' 17" W, along the Quarter Quarter Section
Line; approximately 380 feet to the east right-of-way line
of Oregon Street ; thence northerly along the east right of
way line and extension into Washington Park approximately
675 feet to the north line of the Park road; thence wester-
ly along the Park road approximately 235 feet ; thence
southerly approximately 280 feet along the west property
linos of three lots, thence westerly along a property ap-
proximately 180 feet to the west right-of-way of Montana
Street approximately 630 feet to the LaSalotte North
property line thence N 87 degrees 04 ' 17"W, parallel to said
north line, 590 feet to the Quarter Section Line; thence S
02 degrees 45' 29" W. along the Quarter Section Line,
1052. 14 feet; thence S 87 degrees 01 ' 55" E, 30.00 feet to
a point on the north line of a tract of land as described
in Book 231, at Page 483, Cole County Recorder's Office;
thence easterly along said north line on the following
courses and distances, S 87 degrees 01 ' 55" E, 1.75.00 foet ;1`
thence N 02 degrees 45' 29" E, 22.40 feet ; thence S 89 1i
degrees 30' 37" E, 307. 35 feet to the northeast corner
thereof; thence S 04 degrees 12' 53" W, along the east line„
of said tract 346.45 feet to the Section Line; thence S I
87 degrees 01' 55" E, along the Section Line, 864. 87 feet sf
to the point of beginning. Bearings are magnetic. '
WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has made detailed studies
of the location, physical condition of structures, land use, en-
vironmental influences, and social, cultural, and economic condi-
tions of the Project area and has determined that the area is a
blighted area and that it is detrimental and a menace to the
safety, health, and welfare of the inhabitants and users thereof iE
and of the Locality at large, because of defective, inadequate ;s
street layout; unsanitary, unsafe conditions; deterioration of site
improvements; improper subdivision and obsolete platting; which E?
together retard the provision of housing accomodation and consti-
tute an economic and social liability and a menace to the public 1:
health, safety and welfare in its present condition and use, and
. the members of this Governing Body have been fully apprised by tholf
Local Public Agency and are aware of these facts and conditions; !;
and
WHEREAS, there has been prepared and referred to the City
Council of the Locality (herein called the "Governing Body") for I
review and approval an Urban Renewal Plan for the Project area, ;
. 1{
__ REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15,1980
:..x�.,.»n..n...r..,-..re.vm.....r..«,,..j�.w<....s.....,..s..,w.... .'°.�.........-..._ _.. -....._. .. ........... ....,. «.._... ....._._.,,.,. .,.........,.......«..+x.. .,tew.:.«
lidated September 1 , 1980, and consisting of 14 pages , a relocation
! plan consisting of 5 pages , and 3 exhibits supported by the fol-
lowing supplementary material, data, and recommendations, which
material, data, and recommendations are not a part of the Urban
hRenewal Plan: i
II 1. Letter of Approval of the City Planing and Zoning ;I
Commission, indicating that LaSalette Urban Renewal i1
b Plan does not conflict with the general plan for the
li development of the community as a whole. ,
J 2. Ordinance 9466 (Rezoning)
Resolution WHEREAS , the Urban Renewal Plan has been approved by the
Urban Re- "!
na (' Governing Body of the Local Public Agency, as evidenced by the copy .!
ne aletteof said Body's duly certified resolution approving the Urban Renewal
Area. ; Plan, which is attached thereto and;
• WHEREAS , a general plan has been prepared and is recognized :;
and used as a guide for the general development of the Locality as
a whole; and
WHEREAS , the Urban Renewal Plan for the Project area pre-
scribes certain land uses for the Project area and will require ,
;; among other things , the vacating and removal of streets , alleys and `; -
! other public ways, the establishment of new street patterns , the 1
ii location and relocation of sewer and water mains and other public
jlfacilities, and other public action ; and
it WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has prepared and submitted '.
. a program for the relocation of individuals and families that may
• ,f be displaced as a result of carrying out the Project in accordance ,
Hwith the Urban Renewal Plan ; and
WHEREAS, there have also been presented to the Governing
;:Body information and data respecting the relocation program which 4 •
(! has been prepared by the Local Public Agency as a result of studies ;:
surveys, and inspections in the Project area and the assembling d
and analysis of the data and information obtained from such studies :!
rurveys, and inspections ; and
WHEREAS , the members of the Governing Body have general
knowledge of the conditions prevailing in the Project area and of
the availability of proper housing in the Locality for the role--
1i cation of individuals and families that may be displaced from the
Project area, and in the light of such knowledge of local housing
conditions, have carefully considered and reviewed such proposals •
for relocation; and .
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the Governing Body take ap-
propriato official action respecting the relocation program and the
Renewal Plan for the Project , in conformity with Chapter 99 '
11 of the Missouri Statutes; and
,# WHEREAS , the Governing Body is cognizant of the conditions
that are imposed in the undertaking and carrying out of urban Inewal projects under Chapter 99 of the Missouri Statutes, including
• lithose prohibiting discrimination because of race, color, creed, or #!
I national origin : q
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE I�
CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI :
11 1. That it is hereby found and determined that the Project +
is a slum, blighted, deteriorated and deteriorating area and 4!
qualifies as an eligible Project area under' Section 99. 320 Revised
Statutes of Missouri for 1959.
i 2. That the Urban Renewal Plan for the Project , having it
been duly reviewed and considered, is hereby approved, and the City
i�Clerk be and is. hereby directed to file said copy of the Urban Re-
newal Plan with the minutes of this meeting.
3. That it is hereby found and determined that the ob- +I
jectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through more li
ilextensive rehabilitation of the Project area. !
4. That it is hereby found and determined that the Urban
#Renewal Plan for the Project area is feasible and in conformity i!
(with the general plan for the development of the community as a I
:whole. 1
5. That the redevelopment of the Urban Renewal Area for
predominantly residential uses is necessary for the proper develop- ;t
inent of the community.
6. That is is hereby found and determined that the Urban
Renewal Plan for the Urban Renewal Area will afford maximum op-
{
it
1
1
•
REGULAR COUNCIL�MgETINGSEPTEMBER 154__1,980
__.__.____..__�_�._____
I portunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Locality as a
whole, for the urban renewal of the area by private enterprise.
7. That it is hereby found and determined that the Urbt.n
Renewal Plan for the Urban Renewal Area gives due consideration to
the provision of adequate park and recreational areas and facilities,
as may be desirable for neighborhood improvement , with special
consideration for the health, safety , and welfare of children and j'
I elderly residing in the general vicinity of the site covered by
the Plan.
8. That it is hereby found and determined that the program
for the proper relocation of individuals and families displaced
in carrying out the Project in decent , safe, and sanitary dwellings
}� in conformity with acceptable standards is feasible and can be
reasonably and timely effected to permit the proper prosecution
and completion of the Project ; and that such dwellings or dwelling
units available or to be made available to such displaced indivi
duals and families are at least equal in number to the number of
displaced individuals and families, are not generally less de-
f' sirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial
facilities than the dwellings of the displaced individuals and
i families in the Project area, are available at rents or prices
I within the financial means of the displaced individuals and
! families, and are reasonably accessible to their places of employ-;
ment.
9. That in order to implement and facilitate the effectua-:
tion of the Urban Renewal Plan hereby approved, it is found and
determined that certain official action must be taken by this Sodyi'
with reference, among other things, to the vacating and removal of
I streets, alloys , and other public ways , the establishment of new
street patterns , the location and relocation of sewer and water
mains and other public facilities, and other
I public action , and,
accordingly , this Body hereby (a) pledgee its cooperation in
helping to carry out the Urban Renewal Plan ; (b) requests the
various officials, departments, boards , and agencies of the
3 Locality having udmin.itstrnti.ve responsibilities in the promises
p likewise to cooperate to such end and to exorcise their respective'
functions and powers in a manner consistont with the Urban Ronowal
Plan ; and (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action
} upon proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Urban
Renewal Plan.
/s/George Hartsfivld, Mayor
ATTEST: /s/ Libby Tihon , City Clerk.
Councilman Whitocotton moved the adoption of the Resolutioni,.
Motion seconded by Councilman Wade and passed.
is
Mayor Ilartsfield then called on Mr. Joe DeLong to give a report I' Solid
on the Solid Waste Disposal. Committee. Mr. DeLong stated the Waste
Committee had looked at well over six thousand acres around Committee
Jefferson City, and the various types of terrain in the areas , an4 Report
tonight he wished to tell the Council they had located an area, !
which consists of 150 acres we feel is pretty well isolated and
people-free. We did not want to come up with a location you had ;'
to drive by lots of homes to get there. The place will need more
exploration - it is four miles from Jefferson City, within one-
quarter mile as close as the existing land-fill. The next thing
we need to do is option the property, and the owner is willing, w
and then consult a number of engineering firms , come up with a
proposal as to a price to explore the property. What needs to
I be done is core-drilling for the type of rock, the depth of the
rock, the depth of the dirt - it is generally called preliminary
engineering for sanitary landfills. While this is being done the
Committee intends to keep exploring and come up with alternates , N
which no doubt will be further out . The Committee feels it is
extremely important that the City eventually control the disposal ;;;
site. Mr. DeLong stated all he wanted the Council to do tonight
was to approve the Committee going through these steps , then the 1`
proper City Departments can make contact with the Engineering !;
Firms and get various prices on the steps the Consulting Engineer ;
would recommend, and there is no way of stating what the price
might be. Up to this point we have used Engineering Service from
1
, r?k.,..'a:.,i+t-�
, :21
,, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1980
:°t ii the State Geologist ' s Department .
,_:` ` The Mayor then stated he felt the consensus was for Tom
Benton to go ahead and research list of Consultants and come back
with proposals, costs, etc. , and Mr. DeLong agreed to work closely
1 with Mr. Benton. ,`,
Riverfront The report from the Riverfront Commission would not be given tonight
Commission since Mr. Fred Lafser was out of town , but would be postponed until
the next meeting.
f
Chamber of Mayor Hartsfield then stated Mr. Bo Frazier would speak for the
Commerce Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Study Group. A book was
. Economic previously distributed to Council Members.
Study Group ; Mr. Frazier stated he was a member of this Group which had
'a, Report. been working on Economic Development of Convention and Tourism for
µz
Jefferson City. He referred to a recent survey made, the result
;, of which showed eighty-one percent of the surveyed respondents felt ,
. that Jefferson City should be more involved in economic development ,
such as attracting new industry , jobs and convention and tourism i
promotion. There is more that should be done in Jefferson City on
economic development and tourism promotion. We are losing it to
- our Sister Cities, the various Associations are going to other
, Cities to have their Conventions, and we are losing money on that
account. Other Cities and areas are spending various amounts to
promote tourism and we cannot compete with them without additional
staff. We have had excellent results with economic development in
the past but our community is growing rapidly and we cannot keep
pace without additional staff and money. There is the question of
funding. Our proposal would be that it would be jointly funded -
the Chamber of Commerce would fund part of it , hopefully , the City
would fund part of it , and hopefully , the County would fund part
of it. It is further proposed that the Chamber have a separate
Economic Development Managment Bureau and the City and County pro--
vide funds, through a contract for Hervi.ces , and that office
report back through the Fxecutive Vice President of the Chamber of
Commerce and eventually to the Board of Directors.
Basically , we are here to throw out theme Ideas , and if
you have road the booklet and have any questions wO would be glad
to try to answer them. Mr. Carmichael , President of the Chamber ,
Charles Dudenhoeffer, Chairman of the Economic Development Commit-
tee , and Jim Anderson, Executive Vice President of the Chamber aro .
+ hare.
': The City is being asked to contribute $45 ,000.00, the ;,
County $30,000. 00 and the Chamber the balance. Hopefully , some day
the Chamber will be able to carry more of the load and the City ' s 1
contribution could be reduced. This is a meager budget proposed, If
in comparison to what other Cities are doing. We would like this z
to be a Chamber Project but do not have the money to handle it at
this time, and it is of vital interest to the City - money that
will be spent and bring back tax revenues. At this point we do not ]
have a commitment from the County.
Mr. Frazier stated they would like some indication of sup- .'
i� port from the Council. Mayor replied that at this time all they
could get would be a motion expressing intent of general support of
!' the concept , the Budget process will start shortly and the matter
; can be considered at that time. j
H Councilman Crader made the motion that we appropriate the
; $45,000. 00 out of the upcoming budget. Motion seconded by Council-
man Gordon and passed unanimously.
Ma or Hartsfield then stated that for the }
Y past three weeks or so,
Cole County the City Administration and the Cole County Historical Society, the
Historical State and other parties, have been looking at some opportunities
Society for use of the Old Jail, its preservation and productive use.
Old Jail) ;, • opefully, if it is going to be retained, it can be used for some '!
;' public function related to basic City services or, ideally, to law
enforcement, since it is the Old Jail and located adjacent to the
! Police Station. i`
Mayor then called on Dave Brydon to present the proposal of '
I
1;
E
y ,;:n; 7.. ...:.::'7 .f ::4 ..... ,.+ar.r. .. e. s .. ,,...F i ._ ?S'4. ?.J.,
422
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1980
the Cole County Historical Society, which is not in final detail 11
form but to the point where you would like to have it direct.
Mr. Brydon then passed out some information with their pro-1
posal - that the Old Jail be used for a Juvenile Delinquency Pre- ;i
vention Center. This involves something which came to the atten- jl
tion of the Society and the Committee which was working on trying
to raise the funds to save the Old Jail. We learned that there
perhaps would be available, through the Missouri Council on Crimi- ;
nal Justice, something in the neighborhood of one hundred thousand
1
dollars, which could be used for the restoration of the Old Jail
and which could be used basically for setting up a Juvenile Drug 1
Abuse Prevention Program here in Jefferson City. There are a !
great many people interested in this. There is an obvious need
for it, there are many concerned people and groups who have been Cole County
this sort f thing, �jHistorical
anxious to establish o h ng, and it all seems to fit Societ
together that the Old Jail would be an ideal spot to set it up, Old y
X and the funds obviously are available. We believe there could be E� �
up to one hundred thousand dollars available to restore the 1 Jail) .
i building and establish the Program under the supervision of the H
Jefferson City Police Department , to staff it at least for awhile,
1 in a partial fashion, and set up supplies, etc. i�
I! Corporal Moses of the Missouri State Highway Patrol , who ij
t has been very active in the drug abuse prevention area, heartily 1
1 endorses this program, has materials available, and will be able 1
to assist in sustaining the program and helping set it up. Dr.
Folkins, Superintendent of Schools, also endorses the program and 11
regretted he could not be present with us tonight . 1+
There would be no City Funds involved in setting this up.
The City would merely have to make application for the Grant , Ii
through the various channels, and if it came through, as we believe
it will, it would simply be a matter of coordinating the effort
and putting it together. Also, we believe it could be done within
nth's time.
Mayor Hartsfield inquired of Mr. Brydon - they want some
indication that the City is willing to proceed and apply for the
Grant -- and Mr. Dryden replied that was all they wanted at this h II
point.
Councilman Wade made the motion that the Council endorse
the Program and apply for the Grunt to the M.C.C.J. , for the Old 1!
Jail , Councilman Brant seconded the motion and it passed by the d
following Roll Call. vote: :
Councilmen voting Aye: Brant , Hequombourg, Prongor, Wade
and Whitocotton. ►
Councilmen voting Nay: Borgmeyer, Cruder, Gordon , Kliogel. L
Councilmen absent None. fI
.. ii
Mayor Hartsfield then advised that another item on the Agenda was Auditors-
the approval of Auditors for the fiscal year 1980. It was the ; Fiscal
understanding when we selected Auditors last year that it their Year
work was satisfactory and the rates reasonable they would be re- ' 1980.
tamped for three years at least .
Mr. Wattenbarger advised that Peat , Marwick and Mitchell
did the audit last year and they have submitted a quotation of
$15,000. 00 plus expenses, for the fiscal year 1980. I
Councilman Kliegel suggested that in the future, when die- 1
cussion is had with the Auditors about fees for next year' s audit ,
that the Chairman of the Council' s Finance Committee be present ,
Mayor Hartsfield suggested that Mr. Wattenbarger have copies
of the letter of quotation sent to the Council tomorrow, j
Councilman Brant made the motion that Peat , Marwick and
Mitchell be employed as auditors for the fiscal year 1980, at the �!
rate of $15,000. 00, plus expenses. Motion seconded by Councilman r
Kliegel and passed.
Il
Motion made and passed to adjourn. I
1
1
I
lj