HomeMy Public PortalAbout19800818 t may. '`.
^SC7^y
Re ul Council , eeting, August 8, 198.0. w _. . _ .�_ M . �. . _ _a
,� i'Mayor Pro tem Hequembourg presided. r
rM1�°: y.
,,-z ti
-;::t ;, Prayer offered by Rev. David Shipley, Second Baptist Church.
1
>= 1Councilmen present: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon, Kliegel,
y
,, ti Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.
�iICouncilmen absent : None.
1, A quorum was declared present .
The following bids were received for the construction of three jOpening
' City Parking Lots : ; of
_."..:, TOTAL "Bids.
Wavco $ 72,556 . 25
`je li J. C. Industries , Inc. 67,009. 70
:i
Willard Stockman Construction Co, , Inc, 64, 975 .00
!, ;The bide were referred to the Director of Public Works for
: ( d
consideration, Later in the meeting he reported back and recommend-
, the acceptance of the bid of Willard Stockman Construction
:',( Company, Inc. , in the amount of $64,975.00.
_ Councilman Borgmeyer made the motion that we accept the bid
,`xr of Willard Stockman Construction Company, Inc. , in the amount of
j $64,975.00. Motion seconded by Councilman Whitecotton and passed.
The Minutes of the Council Meeting of August 4, 1980, and the City Approval
pAdminietrator's Report, were received, of
J Councilman Whitecotton made the motion that such Minutes and Minutes
I the Report be approved. Motion seconded by Councilman Prenger and
( passed,
The Minutes of the meetings of the Committee of the Whole, Planning
and Zoning Commission, and Parking and Traffic Commission, were j
received and filed,
The petition from David L. and Sharon J. Kissinger, for ''Planning and
rezoning of Lot 8, Scheperle and Hutton Subdivision, from RS 2 to Zoning
RA, together with check in the amount of $50.00,was received. The Commissio
matter was turned over to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
' hMayor Pro tem Hequembourg then called for presentations from the
gallery and referred to the four Bills pending on the Informal
Calendar. Councilman Wade, sponsor of the Bills , agreed that after
the presentation he would bring the Bills from the Informal Calendar;
and action could be taken at that time so that the interested Presentations
�I
parties in the gallery would know the action of the Council . There , Parking
(,was no objection. Clark Ave.
I' Sharon Smith, 1129 East McCarty Street , spoke for the residents and
in the vicinity and referred to the petitions which had been filed, East
iIwhich included some sixteen hundred names . McCarty St.
James Strong, StateRepresentative from the 119th District,
{ spoke against the removal of the parking. He thought the Council
should try for a compromise, have a full and open hearing. 'f
Mayor Pro tem Hequembourg responded to Representative Strong
with the statement that there had been ample opportunities for
these residents to appear and be heard, and it is not being done
without proper hearings having been held.
Jennifer Durham, President of the East Side Betterment i
Association, spoke against removal of the parking and answered
questions .
Wendall Manchester, who lives on the corner of Clark Avenue
and East McCarty Street , spoke against the removal and stated that '
neither he nor his tenant had a parking place in front or on the
side of his home.
Tom Pardoe from Elmer's Shoe Repair, also appeared in
opposition to the removal of the parking.
An unidentified resident of 422 Clark Avenue appeared and !i
stated he had had his sidewalk replaced at the cost of four hundred
dollars , on account of his loan from the Housing Authority, and
then the City replaced the three foot sidewalk with a four foot
sidewalk.
Councilman Crader stated there had been much consideration
shown these residents, there have been many meetings held and
III
opportunity given for the residents to appear and be heard, there
were concessions made, and we should try this project .
Mayor Pro tem Hequembourg then stated if there was no one else
to be heard they would proceed with the Bills,
i
I �i
Regular Council Meeting„August 18, 1980,_
'Bill No, 58, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled.
! "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson,Missouri, amending the Code
�,of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by adding 'Clark Avenue, on the 1
;west side thereof, for a distance of 120 feet from East McCarty
Street' to Section 23-79 (a) relating to parking prohibited at all
times at designated locations." il
Bill 58. ;; Councilman Wade called Bill No. 58 from the Informal Calendar,,
Parking !and it was then read the third time by title and placed on final i
Prohibited �`passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9478:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel, Prenger and Wade. 1
, Councilmen voting Nay: Whitecotton. {
.j
Councilmen absent: None. 1
Bill 59. i1Bi11 No. 59, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled: if
Truck 11"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending the Code �1
Parking of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by adding a roadway to Section i,
Prohibited ;23-79(a) relating to parking prohibited at all times at designated r
`locations to read 'Clark Avenue on both sides thereof for a !
distance of 30 feet from E. Miller. Street".
Councilman Wade called Bill No. 59 from the Informal Calendar.
Councilman Cradde-made the motion that this Bill be amended to
exclude truck traffic, commercial vehicles , only, for a distance of l
ii
,1thirty (30) feet from East Miller Street. The Amendment would ;j
change the Section Number of the Code from 23-79(a) to 23-85(a) in I
ithe Title and in the body of the Ordinance. The Amendment was I
passed by the following vote: rl
I Councilmen voting Aye: Brant, Crader, Gordon, Kliegel,
1 Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.
:I!
I Councilman voting Nay: Borgmeyer. 11
1 Councilmen absent: None.
!IBill No. 59 was then read the third time by title, as amended, I
placed on final passage and was passed by the following vote as 1
!Ordinance No. 9479:.
j Councilmen voting Aye: Brant , Crader, Gordon, Kliegel,
III 1 Prenger and Wade.
Councilmen voting Nay: Borgmeyer and Whitecotton.
Councilmen absent: None. i
{
Bill No. 60, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled: i
11"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending the Code
Bill 60. 1of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by adding 'McCarty Street, on the •
Parking ;;north side thereof, from the east side of the Nelson Vincent !
ProhibitedUlneuranco Agency at 1213 East McCarty to the west side of the �I
drive at Smitty's Cafe' to Section 23-79(a) relating to parking
�prohibited at all times at designated locations ."
Councilman Wade called Bill No, 60 from the Informal Calendar
and it was then read the third time by title and placed on final 1
l!passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9480:
Councilmen voting Aye: Brant , Crader, Gordon, Kliegel, II
E' Prenger and Wade. A
f! Councilmen voting Nay: Borgmeyer and Whitecotton,
:I 11 Councilmen absent: None.
Bill 67. 11Bil1 No. 67, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled:
Parking "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, amending the Code of the
Prohibited1City of Jefferson, 1978, by adding 'McCarty Street, east, for a
!distance of 38 feet in a westerly direction from the west edge of
ithe drive west of Smitty's Cafe' to Section 23-89 relating to one
I,hour parking."
! Councilman Wade called Bill No. 67 from the Informal Calendar ;I
land it was then read the third time by title and placed on final
!passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9481: It
1 Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
1 Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton
Councilmen voting Nay: None
1 Councilmen absent: None.
III Mayor Pro tem Hequembourg then stated that as Acting Mayor while
. Mayor Hartsfield is out of town, he would sign these Ordinances,
!because the majority of the Council Members had voted their intent, :
and this should rule. - - - - - - - - - - 11
1
1
s J r. T.
,,C _. s. .. x v w v.r.-; A. D'P"/...3.A3.3 r':..nS?' w.0, 5 3 3'3 a 3:f - Y a 3.i I d.*,4 1,33 r.r,. ? :'h> t :
hi r .
::}N t�f
rr f
Regular Council Meeting, August 18, 1980 �..w
g
'Mayor Pro tem Hequembourg then stated they would have discussion on
the Ordinance pending regarding Cable Television. There is some
.question about the Ordinance to be introduced regarding rates for
1 l; cable television, and at this time we would like to clarify the
i,matter before the Ordinance is introduced.
Attorney John Hendren, representing the TCI Cablevision, Inc. ,
' stated they would like to have the increase in rates in two steps ,
one in the amount of sixty (.60) cents , to go into effect as soon
as the Ordinance is passed, the second increase of forty-five ( .45)
4cents, would go into effect with the construction of the earth
station. The Company has to spend much money in constructing the
earth station and they do not want to do this unless they are sure Cable
the rate increase will be given. After some discussion, it was Television.
suggested that two Ordinances be written and introduced - one would
Mallow the increase of sixty ( .60) cents at this time, the other
`would be submitted with regard to the earth station, in the amount
of forty-five ( .45) cents .
j; Councilman Kliegel agreed to sponsor the one Ordinance,
requesting the sixty cent increase only. Councilman Brant agreed
to sponsor the Ordinance requesting the forty-five cent increase,
with regard to the earth station.
Mayor Pro tem Hequembourg stated the first Ordinance could be
fiintroduced at the first meeting in September and a Public Hearing
�(held on it at that time. Then, if further questions arose, they
could be answered at the second meeting in September, before a
l{ final vote is taken.
Councilman Gordon requested that before the Public Hearing
[ they pursue the possibility of having twenty channels , which was
! previously discussed, and give a report at that time.
Attorney Hendren agreed to draft the two Ordinances .
��Bill No. 76, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled: Bill 76.
1 "An Ordinance directing the Mayor of the City of Jefferson City, Contract
Missouri, to execute on its behalf a contract with Missouri Power Mo. P.&L.
{& Light Company for furnishing street lighting in said City of Street
'Jefferson City, Missouri." Lighting III
Bill No. 76 rend first and second time by title and ordered
distributed to members of the Council .
Bill No. 77, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled: Bill 77.
"An Ordinance directing the Mayor of the City of Jefferson City, Contract
1Missouri, to execute on its behalf an electric service contract MO, P.&L.
with Missouri Power & Light Company. " Electric
1 Bill No. 77 read first and second time by title and ordered Service.
'distributed to members of the Council.
(Bill No. 79, introduced by Councilmen Crader and Borgmeyer, Bill 79.
entitled: Agreement
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, authorizing and Mo. State
directing the Mayor and City Clerk of the City to execute a written Highway Comm.
Urban Agreement with the Missouri State Highway Commission for the 'Southwest
Southwest Boulevard Interchange. " Blvd.
Bill No. 79 read first and second time by title and ordered Interchange.
distributed to members of the Council.
Bill No. 80, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled: Bill 80.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, calling for a Special
Special Election to fill an unexpired term of Councilman, Ward 5, Election.
in the City of Jefferson, Missouri. " 5th Ward
Bill No. 80 was read the first and second time by title, and Councilman.
on request of Councilman Brant the rules were suspended and the
Bill was read the third time by title and placed on final passage
and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9482:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.
Councilmen voting Nay: None
Councilmen absent : None.
Bill No. 81, introduced by Councilman Brant , entitled: Bill 81.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, appropriating Transit
money out of unappropriated fund balance of the General Fund, to Fund
the Transit Fund." A ppro-
priation.
. ..,
oil')
.. .
'Aill No. 81 was read first and second time by title, and on. request
of Councilman Brant the rules were suspended and the Bill was read
the third time by title and placed on final passage and was passed
:,,..
by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9483:
,, Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant , Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton
Councilmen voting Nay: None
None
t
bs
il
Councmen absent: , None.
, .
•
Bill 82. Aill No. 82, introduced by Councilman Crader, entitled:
Transit "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending the Code
)
System of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by adding Section 11-4 'Transit
Fares. System Fares '''.
. , Bill No. 82 was read first and second time by title, and on ::•
request of Councilman Crader the rules were suspended and the Bill
A .=
was read the third time by title and placed on final passage and
was passed by the following vote as Ordinance No. 9484: A ?
Bill 83. Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
Please Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.,
see , Councilmen voting Nay: None.
Page 400. k- Councilmen absent: None.
. .•
------. • _
,68,No..
Bill 68. :Bill No 68 introduced by Councilman Brant, entitled:
. .
.
Gross "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, levying a License
Receipts Tax on the gross receipts of persons , firms or corporations engaged ,..:.
Tax, in the business of selling natural gas, manufactured gas, electri-
city, or.both gas and electricity, or furnishing telephone service
or telecommunications services to the public for the privilege of
conducting such business in the City of Jefferson, Missouri,
repealing Ordinance No. 9421 and enacting a new Ordinance in lieu
: thereof."
) Bill No. 68 was read the third time by title and placed on
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
41o. 9485: j
H
q Councilmen voting Aye: Brant, Crader, Gordon, Kliegel, 1
Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.
' Ill i Councilmen voting Nay: Borgmeyer.
Councilmen absent : None. ,
ABill No. 69, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled:
. flAn Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending the Code
of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by adding 23-93(d) , handicapped ,
Bill 69. ; parking."
Handicapped Bill No. 69 was read the third time by title and placed on
Parking. ; final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
f No. 9486: .
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, . Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton;!
• Councilmen voting Nay: None.
Councilmen absent: None.
Bill 70. [Bi11 No. 70, introduced by Councilman Hequembourg, entitled: ' ;,
Approving "An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, accepting and A
q
Major's approving the replat of Lots 50, , 65, and 66, part of Lot 51, and 11
Boonville Ipart of Southern Air Drive, Major's Boonville Acres, Section Two,
Acres- a subdivision of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, as herein
Sec. 2. lidescribed. "
Bill No. 70 was read the third time by title and placed on
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance 1
iiNo. 9487:
II Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
ii Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecottonji
• Councilmen voting Nay: None
Councilmen absent: None. II
Bill 71. Alill No. 71, introduced by Councilman Hequembourg, entitled:
Approving ':,'"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, accepting and
Mall Ridge approving the plat of Mall Ridge Addition, Section Three, a 1
Addition subdivision of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, as herein described',
Sec. 3. Bill No. 71 was read the third time by title and placed on
i
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance 0
11No. 9488:
•
. Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon, 1
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton
Councilmen voting Nay: None
Councilmen absent: None. • il
1 '
. . _
O t)
.__Res*ax_ Council Meetiing,_Au gust 10,_..1980.._.___.....
ffiiii No. 72, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled: ;'Bill 72.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, accepting and :Acceptin
+iapproving the plat of G. B. Subdivision, Section Two, a subdivision G. B.
ilof the City of Jefferson, Missouri, as herein described." Subdvsn.
it Bill No. 72 was read the third time by title and placed on Sec. 2. .
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
No. 9489:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton,
Councilmen voting Nay: None •
•
Councilmen absent: None.
+Bill No. 73, introduced by Councilman Brant, entitled: 13ill 73.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, granting the `Missouri
franchise, right, permission and authority to the Missouri Power & Power &
Light Company, a corporation, organized and existing under and by Light
virtue of the Laws of the State of Missouri, its successors and Franchise.
assigns , to construct, maintain and operate a system for the
manufacture, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity for
lighting, heating, power and related purposes and a plant and syst€nt
of mains, pipes, services and other appliances for the manufacture,
transmission, distribution and sale of natural or artificial gas ,
or both, for lighting heating, industrial and other uses , in, upon,
over, across , under and along the streets , avenues , alleys , bridges ,
and public places of the City of Jefferson, County of Cole, State
of Missouri: Providing the terms thereof: and providing for the
submission of this Franchise to the qualified voters of said City
at a Special Election."
Bill No. 73 was read the third time by title and placed on
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
No. 9490:
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel , Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.',
Councilmen voting Nay: None.
Councilmen absent: None.
.
Bill No. 74, introduced by Councilmanliequembourg, entitled:
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, amending the Code
of the City of Jefferson, 1978, by repealing Section 23-167 Bill 74.
motorcycles and motorbikes , and enacting a new Section 23-167, Motorcycles ,
motorcycles and motorized bicycles and motortricycles , in lieu .motorbikes ,
thereof." ;. etc.
Mayor Pro tem lequembourg, as sponsor of Bill 74, requested
that it be placed on the Informal Calendar until clarification of
the Ordinance can be made. There was no opposition.
Bill No. 75, introduced by Councilman Borgmeyer, entitled: Bill 75.
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, vacating and `Vacating
discontinuing as a public street a part of Southern Air Drive ;;portion of
, right-of-way, reserving to the City an easement in the right of wayjSouthern
vacated for sanitary sewer, surface water drainage, and public {'Air Drive.
utility purposes, and authorizing and directing the Mayor and Clerk (:
of the City to execute all instruments required to confirm in the
abutting property owners their right of reversion in the vacated
area."
Bill No. 75 was read the third time by title and placed on
final passage and was passed by the following vote as Ordinance
No. 9491: is
Councilmen voting Aye: Borgmeyer, Brant, Crader, Gordon,
Kliegel, Prenger, Wade and Whitecotton.;r
Councilmen voting Nay: None
Councilmen absent: None.
I
The following Resolution was introduced:
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE INTENT OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
TO ISSUE ITS SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS AND ESTABLISHING iE
A MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL AMOUNT FOR SUCH BONDS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, Ij
(
III
the "City") , has determined that it is necessary and in the best
interests of the citizens of the City to provide for and promote
the public health, safety and welfare; to encourage the expansion i!
of industrial and commercial activities and the economic development!
of the City; and to provide an adequate supply of residential I;
housing for low or moderate income persons and families ; and !'
ii
* ,1I
_ Regular Council Meeting,_ Au�ut 18, 19$0, _.. ._._._,_�„�,,.,.
n
t WHEREAS, to implement the aforesaid public purposes, the City it
?Council desires to express its intent to issue its Single Family
`" ';Mortgage Revenue Bonds by authorizing and entering into a contract
with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, St. Louis , Missouri
(the "Underwriter") , to advise the City Council concerning the
aforesaid issuance and authorizing the undertaking of a demographic
or related study of the mortgage market in the City, and by appoint-
ing the law firm of Gaar & Bell, Kansas City, Missouri, Bond Counsel,
to advise the City on the legal aspects of authorizing and issuing
said bonds .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY'
• :OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution 1. That the City Council states its intention to issue the
Revenue Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds of the City in the maximum
Bonds , principal amount of 20,000,000, '
2. That the City Council is hereby authorized to enter into a .
'contract with Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, St. Louis ,
:Missouri (the "Underwriter") . .
3. That the City Council hereby appoints the law firm of .
Gaar. & Bell, Kansas City, Missouri, as Bond Counsel to the City in
connection with the authorization and issuance of the City's Single
:Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds .
.
4. That the City's officials , the Underwriter and Bond Counsel
are hereby authorized and directed to prepare the necessary docu-
ments to provide for the issuance of the City's Single Family
Mortgage Revenue Bonds ,
S. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect
}from and after its adoption by the City Council. F
•
Adopted: August 18, 1980. /s/ John L. Hequembourg,
i; Mayor
Attest /s/ Libby Tihen,
City Clerk.
;Councilman Wade made the motion that .such Resolution be adopted.
Motion seconded by Councilman Gordon and passed unanimously.
The following Resolution was introduced:
;RESOLUTION APPROVING, ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AGREEMENT FOR SMALL CITIES
DISCRETIONARY FUNDING 3rd YEAR,
Resolution WHEREAS the City of Jefferson, Missouri, (herein called the
Small proposes to enter into a Grant Agreement,
Cities ;including HUD-7082, "Funding Approval, and Acceptance Provisions
Funding ;,attached hereto (herein called the "Agreement") with the United 1
3rd year. States of America (herein called the "Government") .
, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ApBI,IE.ANT/GRANTEE, as follows
Section 1, The Agreement in substantially the form of contract
hereto attached and marked "Exhibit A" is hereby approved and
;accepted both as to form and substance and the (Chief Executive
!Officer or authorized official) is hereby authorized and directed
It o execute said Agreement in three copies on behalf of the
Applicant/Grantee, and the Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to impress and attest the official seal of the Applicant/Grantee on
each such counterpart and to forward two executed counterparts , to
;;the Government together with such other documents evidencing the
approval and authorizing this execution thereof as may be required
lby the Government.
'Section 2. Whenever the following terms , or any of them, are used
;din this Resolution, the same, unless the context shall indicate
(;another or different meaning or intent, shall be construed, and are
Antended to have meanings as follows: .
(1) The term "Resolution" shall mean thisResolution.
i,
�1 (2) All other terms used in this Resolution and which are
defined in the Grant Agreement shall have the respective
x!
meanings ascribed thereto in the Grant Agreement. •
' ill ,
'Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately,
Mate: ,August 18, 1980.
/s/ John 'L. Hequembourg, .
ili
President of the Council.
!Attest - /s/ Libby Tihen, Date: 8/18/80
City Clerk.
.
398
___ ._.. .._..._....Regular.._.Council. Meeting. _August 18,. ..1980..
Councilman Whitecotton made the motion that such Resolution be
adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Borgmeyer and passed
unanimously.
The following Resolution was introduced:
r 1!RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI,
IIAPPROVING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT.
1
I WHEREAS, under the Land Clearance for Redevelopment Law of the .
State of Missouri, Chapter 99.300-99.660 of the revised statutes
(herein referred to as"Chapter 99") , the City of Jefferson is
liauthorized to , through its Housing Authority, take certain steps
;lin the elimination and prevention of the spread of their slums and
I3urban blight through the planning and undertaking of urban renewal
! projects ; and Resolution
i WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the public interest that the LaSalette
{,Housing Authority of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, make surveys Project.
,land prepare plans, presently estimated to cost approximately Five
Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) in order to undertake and carry out an
urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Chapter 99
in that area proposed as an Urban Renewal Area, situated in the
City of Jefferson, County of Cole, and State of Missouri, which is
described as follows:
i Beginning at the southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter of said Section 12, thence N 02°18'49" E
along the Quarter Quarter Section Line, 672 .97 feet to a point ,
on the west line of Lot No. 1 of said City View Terrance;
thence S 89°05'24" E, 98.20 feet to a point on the south line
of Linden Drive; thence N 52°42'47"W, 51.32 feet to the most
southerly corner of Lot No. 12 of said Panorama Hills ; thence
N 37°19'45" E, along the easterly line of said Lot No. 12,
15.00 feet ; thence N 89°06 '47" W, 64.56 feet to the Quarter
Quarter Section Line; thence N 02°33 '54" E, along the Quarter
Quarter Section Line, 678.35 feet to the Northeast corner of
the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section
! 12 ; thence N87°04 ' 17"W, along the Quarter Quarter Section Line;
P approximately 380 feet to the east right-of-way line of Oregon
ll Street ; thence northerly along the east right of way line and
; extension into Washington Park approximately 675 feet to the
1 north line of the Park road; thence westerly along the Park
road approximately 235 feet; thence southerly approximately280 '
1 feet along the west property lines of three lots , thence west
1 erly along a property approximately 180 feet to the west right '.
I of way of Montana Street approximately 630 feet to the LaSalette
North property line, thence N87°04' 17 'W, parallel to said north
line, 590 feet to the Quarter Section Line ; thence S02°45 '29"W :.
along the Quarter Section Line, 1052. 14 feet; thence S87°01' 55!!
E, 30.00 feet to a point on the north line of a tract of land
as described in Book 231, at Page 483, Cole County Recorder's
Office; thence easterly along said north line on the following ;
courses and distances, S87°01'55"E, 175.00 feet ; thence
NO2°45 '29"E, 22.40 feet ; thence S89°30 '37" E 307. 35 feet to
the north east corner thereof; thence SO4°12'53"W, along the
i,
east line of said tract 346.45 feet to the Section Line,
thence S87°01 '55"E, along the Section Line, 864. 87 feet to the
point of beginning. Bearings are magnetic. ,,
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF !'
JEFFERSON, MISSOURI:
1. That the proposed Urban Renewal Area described above is on
insanitary, blighted, deteriorated, or deteriorating area in need
of rehabilitation and redevelopment and appropriate for an urban
renewal project and that the undertaking by the Housing Authority
of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, of the preparation of plans for
an urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Chapter
99 of the Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri in the proposed :
Urban Renewal Aeea .is hereby approved.
2. That the financial assistance available under the Small
Cities Program #B78-DN-29-5004 is needed to enable the Housing
!pAuthority of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, to finance the
lanning and undertaking of the proposed Project.
1 3. That it is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in ;:
the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects under '
+Chapter 99, including those relating to (a) the relocation of site ;'
11
c) 99
':ogva,.a.x_ aims.. ..Meeting,__ uatt lg,._a.QgO
! occupants, (b) the prohibition of discrimination because of race,
bicolor, creed, or national origin, and (c) the requirement that any
Urban Renewal Plan not conflict with the Citys General Plan
l(Comprehensive Plan) or as it may exist from time to time the work- .
able program for community improvement, for utilizing appropriate
•
• ,public and private resources to eliminate and prevent the
development or spread of slums and urban blight.
Q 4. That it is the sense of this body (a) that a feasible
method for the relocation of individuals and families displaced
from the Urban Renewal Area, can be prepared.
Resolutions{ 5. That the preparation of an Urban Renewal Plan by the
• LaSalette :;Housing Authority of the City of Jefferson, for an urban renewal
Project. !.project in the proposed Urban Renewal Area described is hereby 1
approved. 1
Adopted: August 18, 1980
/s/ John L. Hequembourg,
`'Attest Mayor 1
/8/ Libby Tihen,
City Clerk. ?
!:
;Councilman Gordon made the motion that such Resolution be adopted.
a!Motion seconded by Councilman Whitecotton and passed unanimously.
s
1The following Resolution was introduced and read and after some
odiscussion the Resolution was amended to include the word
"unreasonable", referring to rate increases , and this was agreeable
with the sponsor, Councilman Borgmeyer. The Resolution, as amended
?treads as follows:
1WHEREAS,r the United Telephone Company, which includes Capital
;City Telephone Company, has filed for an increase in the rates for
',telephone service; and
1E WHEREAS, the Missouri Power & Light Company has filed for an
increase in the rates for gas and electrical services ; and
ill „
', WHEREAS, these proposed rate increases affect the residents
of Jefferson City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Jefferson, Missouri, state its opposition to any
unreasonable rate increases for any of these services ; and •
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be filed
with the Missouri Public Service Commission and the Office of the •
1 Public Counsel.
Adopted this 18th day of August, 1980.
Resolutionll ,
Opposing I" /s/ John L. Hequembourg
Utility (,±Attest Mayor Pro tem
Rate 11 /s/ Libby Tihen, .
Increases ] City Clerk.
. Councilman Borgmeyer than made the motion that such Resolution, as
amended, be adopted. Motion seconded by Councilman Gordon and
passed unanimously.
Resolution ;Councilman Brant offered a Resolution to hire Attorneys to assist
Hiring ?City Attorney Graham in prosecution or defense of law suits pending,
Attorneys f pursuant to Section 2-106, authorizing appointment of additional
to assist ,Counsel to assist the City Attorney, as determined by the Mayor and
City ;City Attorney. The money is budgeted. This would include legal
Attorney. �Counsel as well as expert witness services , court costs, and
expenses .
Councilman Crader seconded the adoption of such Resolution
'and motion passed unanimously. j
Police ( ayor Pro tem Hequembourg asked Chief Patton for a report about
Departmentiaccidents in the last two or three years at the overpass on Highways��
Report. '54 and 63 and McCarty Street. If we know the number we can express {
our concern to the Highway Department about the problems at that
'intersection. We would like this report at the next Council meeting:
Councilman Borgmeyer then referred to the bill for interest from
Bill J.C.Industries, Inc. , in the amount of $3,223.94, on the Industrial
J.C.Ind. l rive Railroad, Crossing. He would like this referred to Gary
R.R. I mbarrgc? blic Works Department, and the J .C.Industries , and give
Crossing. a report the first meeting in September. This was
:greeable. }�
•
} 400
.M1.... • • . u . / ', .. . . .10.#
..
.. tiOKlfaMtlwYVriYMy[MW1X'+aiRVtvnYX.l+4nYNHd6'r+•a.1iW 1YR.v tii'.'uvrrt.xn:wrviv:vW*44.,aLJt.V,..pva.?'fbt_`,aYYbJO+wY N •••+FStlt%. tUtV ,AM.tc'?:4Y:, . .
• ' Councilman Kliegel referred to the Sewer Service •Charge and stated
• the felt we were violating the intent of the original Sewer Bond
.*Ordinances. The Bond Issue was passed in 1963 and the intent of
lthe .Bond -Issue was treatment facilities, extension of main trunk I4
lines and rehabilitation of the present sewer system. There have
been salaries paid out of the :fund, and 'in the early 1970's the
iCity began subsidizing Sewer Districts out of the Sewer Fund, and
iit is still being :done at the present time. Sewer
These may be in violation of the Sewer Bond Issue as approved Bond
•
by the voters. He was recommending that on the statement of Issue.
to erations for the year ending December, 1979, I believe at least
• fifty .per •cent ,of ,the salaries should be charged to Revenue Fund -
Ithese .salaries should be comparable to -the amountipaid personnel I
!working on the sewer maintenance prior to the passing of the Sewer f
Bond Issue. Also, eliminate the item of depreciation in the
ifinancial statement, as there actually is no cash involved. Also,
the incumbent expense on Sewer Districts must be eliminated from
ithe Sewer Fund, this should be strictly a revenue income expense
item.
If these recommendations are followed, we should have a Sewer
! Surplus of two hundred thousand dollars annually, which should cove
Ithe .cost of paying principal and interest on Revenue Bords for
several years.
;Councilman Brant: moved for adjournment.
•
Add on Page 395. •
!Bill No. 83, introduced by Councilman Wade, entitled: Bill 83. III
"An Ordinance of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, authorizing and p
directing the Mayor and City Clerk of said City to enter into an
Agreement with R. F. Verslues and Associates , Inc. , regarding Termination
termination of Agreement between the parties dated October 5, 1977, ;Agreement -
and contained in Ordinance 9047. " fVerelues .
Read first and second time by title and ordered distributed
to members of the Council.
t t
i .
t ,
• i
t t
,
•
i .