Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20201209 - Agenda Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 20-29 SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY Wednesday, December 9, 2020 Special Meeting starts at 5:00 PM* Regular Meeting starts at 7:00 PM* A G E N D A Consistent with Governor Gavin Newsom's Executive Order N-29-20, the Governor has allowed local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body or state body to avoid public gatherings, and has suspended all contrary provisions of the Brown Act. THIS MEETING WILL BE VIA TELECONFERENCE ONLY 1. The meeting can be viewed in real-time at: https://openspace.zoom.us/j/81978403665 or listen to the meeting by dialing (669) 900-6833 or (346) 248-7799 (Webinar ID 81978403665). 2. Members of the public may provide written comments by submitting a public comment form at: https://www.openspace.org/public-comment • Comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the board president calls for public comments. • Comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time public comment on the agenda item is closed. • All comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at the board of directors meeting. • Electronic comments on agenda may only be submitted via the public comment form. Comments via text or social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Any comments received after the deadline, will be provided to the Board after the meeting. 5:00 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ROLL CALL SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY Meeting 20-29 Rev. 1/3/20 • Presentation from San Mateo County Re: Unincorporated Area San Mateo County Active Transportation Plan 1. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Training Staff Contact: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager General Manager’s Recommendation: Receive educational training from staff on the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. No Board action required. 2. Annual Bond Disclosure Training for the Board of Directors, Members of the Disclosure Working Group, and Contributors (R-20-141) Staff Contact: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager General Manager’s Recommendation: Receive the annual training on Bond Disclosure obligations, responsibilities, and potential liabilities. No Board action required. ADJOURNMENT 7:00 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the agenda is for members of the public to comment on items not on the agenda; however, the Brown Act (Open Meeting Law) does not allow action by the Board of Directors on items not on the agenda. Individuals are limited to one comment during this section. ADOPTION OF AGENDA SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY • Proclamation for California State Senator Jim Beall CONSENT CALENDAR All items on the Consent Calendar may be approved without discussion by one motion. Board members, the General Manager, and members of the public may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar during consideration of the Consent Calendar. 1. Approve November 18, 2020 Minutes 2. Claims Report 3. Increase of an Existing Half Time Position to a Full Time Position in the Legal Department (R-20-153) Staff Contact: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel General Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt a resolution amending the Budget and Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2020-21 to increase the existing half-time position of Risk Management Analyst to a full-time position in the Legal Department 4. Designation of the Oljon Trail in El Corte de Madera Open Space Preserve as part of the regional Bay Area Ridge Trail (R-20-142) Staff Contact: Arianna Nuri, Planner I, Planning Rev. 1/3/20 General Manager’s Recommendation: Designate the existing Oljon Trail in El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve as a new segment of the regional Bay Area Ridge Trail in accordance with the intentions of the California State Coastal Conservancy-Bay Area Ridge Trail Partner Grants 5. Application for Grant Funding from the Wildlife Conservation Board (R-20-144) Staff Contact: Jordan McDaniel, Senior Grants and Procurement Technician, Administrative Services General Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing the General Manager to submit an application for grant funding from the Wildlife Conservation Board and to negotiate a grant funding agreement for $5,000,000 to support the planning and design of the Highway 17 Wildlife and Regional Trails Crossing Project. 6. Second Reading and Adoption of the Board Compensation Ordinance 20-02 (R-20-147) Staff Contact: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Waive reading and adopt an Ordinance 20-02 increasing Board compensation from $100.00 to $105.00 per meeting pursuant to Public Resources Code section 5536. 2. Amend Board Policy 6.06 to reflect the increase in compensation resulting from the Board compensation ordinance. BOARD BUSINESS Public comment on agenda items at the time each item is considered by the Board of Directors. Written public comments will be provided to the Board prior to the meeting and posted on the District’s website at www.openspace.org. The names of all commenters will be read into the record. 7. Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Financial Report (R-20-145) Staff Contact: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Review and accept the Fiscal Year 2019-20 (FY20) Annual Financial Report. 2. Adopt a resolution approving the transfer of a total of $3 million from the General Fund Unassigned Fund balance to the Committed Fund for Future Acquisitions and Capital Projects. 3. Approve an updated Board Policy 3.08, Statement of Investment, to reflect a prior Board proviso that was omitted from the prior update. 8. 50th Anniversary Celebration Preparations (R-20-148) Staff Contact: Mike Kahn, Public Affairs Specialist II General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Review and provide input on the proposed scope of the 50th Anniversary Celebration plans. 2. Consider formation of an ad-hoc committee to provide continued involvement and timely decisions as planning progresses. INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM • Cloverdale Coastal Ranch Land Conservation Opportunity: Annual Update • Progress Report on Science Advisory Panel Work • Update on the Electric Bicycle Pilot Implementation at Rancho San Antonio and Ravenswood Preserves Rev. 1/3/20 INFORMATIONAL REPORTS – Reports on compensable meetings attended. Brief reports or announcements concerning activities of District Directors and staff; opportunity to refer public or Board questions to staff for information; request staff to report to the Board on a matter at a future meeting; or direct staff to place a matter on a future agenda. Items in this category are for discussion and direction to staff only. No final policy action will be taken by the Board. Committee Reports Staff Reports Director Reports ADJOURNMENT Time Certain – To Be Heard No Earlier Than 8:30 P.M. 8:30 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ROLL CALL 1. Acceptance of the Annual Financial Report of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2020 (R-20-146) Staff Contact: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager Controller’s Recommendation: Accept the Annual Financial Report. ADJOURNMENT *Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is subject to change of order. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the District Clerk at (650) 691-1200. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the District to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Written materials relating to an item on this Agenda that are considered to be a public record and are distributed to Board members less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, will be available for public inspection at the District’s Administrative Office located at 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, California 94022. CERTIFICATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA I, Jennifer Woodworth, District Clerk for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), declare that the foregoing agenda for the special and regular meetings of the MROSD Board of Directors was posted and available for review on December 4, 2020, at the Administrative Offices of MROSD, 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos California, 94022. The agenda and any additional written materials are also available on the District’s web site at http://www.openspace.org. Jennifer Woodworth, MMC District Clerk R-20-141 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2010 SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA ITEM 3 AGENDA ITEM Annual Bond Disclosure Training for the Board of Directors, Members of the Disclosure Working Group, and Contributors GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Receive the annual training on Bond Disclosure obligations, responsibilities, and potential liabilities. No Board action required. SUMMARY Board Policy 3.06 “Initial and Continuing Disclosures for Bond Issuances” requires annual training on Bond Disclosure obligations, responsibilities, and potential liabilities of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) staff and the Board of Directors (Board). This item meets the Bond Disclosure training requirement under Board Policy 3.06. DISCUSSION The Board adopted Policy 3.06 “Initial and Continuing Disclosures Relating to Bond Issuances” on April 1, 2015 and subsequently updated the language on March 22, 2017. This Board Policy states that: “Whenever the District makes statements or releases information relating to its finances to the public that are reasonably expected to reach investors and the trading markets (including, without limitation, all Listed Event Notices, statements in the audited Financial Statements, and other financial reports and statements of the District), the District is obligated to ensure that such statements and information are complete, true, and accurate in all material respects.” To ensure that the Board and key staff are fully aware and periodically reminded of the bond disclosure requirements, including the obligation noted above, Article I, section 1.01 (C) Training states: The Disclosure Coordinator shall arrange for annual disclosure training conducted by the District’s disclosure counsel with the assistance of the General Counsel, for the Board of Directors members, the Disclosure Working Group, and Contributors. Such training sessions shall include education on these Disclosure Procedures, the District’s disclosure obligations under applicable federal and state securities laws, and the disclosure responsibilities and potential liabilities of members of District staff and members of the Board of Directors. R-20-141 Page 2 On December 9, 2020, the District’s Disclosure Counsel, Jacquelynne Jennings from Schiff Hardin, will provide the annual training to the Board, the Disclosure Working Group (General Manager, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, and General Counsel), the Disclosure Coordinator (Finance Manager), and Contributors. FISCAL IMPACT None. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This agenda item was not previously reviewed by a Board Committee. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice was provided pursuant to the Brown Act. No additional notice is necessary. CEQA COMPLIANCE No compliance is required as this action is not a project under CEQA. NEXT STEPS The Bond Disclosure training is held annually, with the next training planned for the fall of 2021. Attachments: 1. Board Policy 3.06 – Initial and Continuing Disclosures Relating to Bond Issuances Responsible Manager: Stefan Jaskulak, Chief Financial Officer Prepared by: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Board Policy Manual Initial and Continuing Disclosures Relating to Bond Issuances Policy 3.06 Chapter 3 – Fiscal Management Effective Date: 04/01/2015 Revised Date: 03/22/2017 Prior Versions: 04/01/2015 Attachments: A – List of Disclosure Documents, to be Amended as Necessary B – Listed Events C –Template of Information to be included in the Staff Report Transmitting Official Statement by General Manager to Board of Directors Board Policy 3.06 Page 1 of 7 Purpose Whenever the District makes statements or releases information relating to its finances to the public that are reasonably expected to reach investors and the trading markets (including, without limitation, all Listed Event Notices, statements in the audited Financial Statements, and other financial reports and statements of the District), the District is obligated to ensure that such statements and information are complete, true, and accurate in all material respects. The disclosure policies and procedures contained herein (the “Disclosure Procedures”) of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the “District”) are intended to ensure that the District’s disclosure documents (the “Disclosure Documents”), as listed on Attachment A to these Disclosure Procedures, are complete, true, and accurate in all material respects, and in compliance with applicable federal and state securities laws. Policy Article I: Key Participants and Responsibilities Section 1.01. Disclosure Working Group. (A) Composition. By adoption of these Disclosure Procedures, the District hereby establishes a disclosure working group (the “Disclosure Working Group”). The members of the Disclosure Working Group shall be the following: i. General Manager; ii. Chief Financial Officer iii. Controller; and iv. General Counsel. (B) Responsibilities. The Disclosure Working Group shall consult with the Financing Group (as defined in Section 1.03) and other interested parties as necessary or helpful. The Disclosure Working Group shall meet as often as necessary to fulfill its obligations, but not less than once per calendar year. Members of the Disclosure Working Group may participate in meetings by telephone. Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06 Page 2 of 7 The Disclosure Working Group is responsible for: i. Reviewing and approving all preliminary and final official statements, private placement memoranda and remarketing memoranda relating to the District’s securities, together with any supplements, for which a continuing disclosure undertaking is required (each, an “Official Statement”) as further described in Article II, before such documents are released to the public; ii. Reviewing and approving the District’s Financial Statements (as defined and further described in Section 3.02 below); iii. Reviewing and approving any other Disclosure Documents before such documents are released; iv. Reviewing annually the District’s status and compliance with continuing disclosure undertakings including filings of Disclosure Documents and compliance with these Disclosure Procedures and the annual financial report as described in Article III below; v. Reviewing any other items referred to the Disclosure Working Group; and vi. Evaluating the effectiveness of these Disclosure Procedures and approving changes to these Disclosure Procedures as further described in Section 5.04 of this Policy. (C) Determination of Disclosure Document Status. Whether or not a particular document or other communication is a Disclosure Document shall be determined by the Disclosure Working Group. At its initial meeting, the Disclosure Working Group shall establish a list of the District’s recurring Disclosure Documents, which list shall be added to Attachment A to these Disclosure Procedures to the extent such documents are not already contained therein. The Disclosure Working Group shall update Attachment A to these Disclosure Procedures when appropriate. (D) Review and Approval. Following receipt of a Disclosure Document from the disclosure coordinator (the “Disclosure Coordinator”), the Disclosure Working Group shall review the Disclosure Document for accuracy and compliance with federal and state securities laws, direct questions tof the Disclosure Coordinator, and approve a substantially final form of the Disclosure Document, which approval may be evidenced by an email transmitted to the Disclosure Coordinator by the General Manager or his/her designee and a copy of which email shall be printed and maintained in the Deal File described in Section 5.01, or by such other written evidence. The Disclosure Coordinator shall consult with the District’s disclosure counsel to the extent the Disclosure Coordinator considers appropriate to perform his or her responsibilities. Section 1.02. Disclosure Coordinator. (A) Appointment. The Finance Manager is appointed as the Disclosure Coordinator. If the position of Finance Manager is vacant, the Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the other members of the Disclosure Working Group, shall select and appoint the Disclosure Coordinator. (B) Responsibilities. The Disclosure Coordinator shall be responsible for: Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06 Page 3 of 7 i. Serving as a “point person” for personnel to communicate issues or information that should be or may need to be included in any Disclosure Document, identifying District personnel that will assist in preparing and reviewing the Disclosure Documents (the “Contributors”); ii. Reviewing annually all continuing disclosure undertakings, preparing a checklist of updated information to be provided; iii. Recommending changes to these Disclosure Procedures to the Disclosure Working Group as deemed necessary or appropriate; iv. Communicating with third parties, including coordination with outside consultants assisting the District in preparing and disseminating Disclosure Documents to make sure that assigned tasks are completed timely, and that the filings are accurate and made timely; v. Soliciting “material” information (as defined for purposes of federal securities law) from District departments to prepare Disclosure Documents; vi. Monitoring compliance by the District with these Disclosure Procedures, including timely dissemination of the Annual Report and Listed Event filings, and maintaining records documenting the District’s compliance with these Disclosure Procedures; vii. Determining when Disclosure Documents are final and ready for review by the Disclosure Working Group to the extent required by these Disclosure Procedures; and viii. Identifying District personnel that should receive disclosure training, and ensuring compliance with training procedures described in Section 1.02(C). The Disclosure Coordinator is authorized to file or cause to be filed the following documents with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”), without prior review and approval of the Disclosure Working Group, but only after prior review and approval from the Chief Financial Officer: those Disclosure Documents that (i) the District is contractually obligated to file with the MSRB pursuant to written undertakings as a result of the occurrence of a Listed Event (as defined in Attachment B), or (ii) as a result of the failure to timely file the required annual financial report. (C) Training. The Disclosure Coordinator shall arrange for annual disclosure training conducted by the District’s disclosure counsel with the assistance of the General Counsel, for the Board of Directors members, the Disclosure Working Group, and Contributors. Such training sessions shall include education on these Disclosure Procedures, the District’s disclosure obligations under applicable federal and state securities laws, and the disclosure responsibilities and potential liabilities of members of District staff and members of the Board of Directors. Such training sessions may be conducted using a recorded presentation. Each member of the Board of Directors, and new members of the Finance Department shall be required to participate in disclosure training as part of his or her new member orientation. Section 1.03. Financing Group. Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06 Page 4 of 7 General. The General Manager or his/her designee shall identify a Financing Group (the “Financing Group”) for each financing (the composition of which may differ for each financing), which shall include, at a minimum, the following individuals: i. Disclosure Working Group; ii. Disclosure Coordinator; iii. The District’s bond counsel and disclosure counsel; iv. The District’s financial advisor (if any); v. The District’s underwriter, placement agent, remarketing agent (as applicable); vi. The District’s dissemination agent (if any); vii. Such other such District staff as the General Manger or his/her designee determines to be appropriate; and viii. Such other consultants retained by the District as the General Manager or his/her designee determines to be appropriate. It is the District’s policy to establish continuing working relationships with professional advisors with expertise in the area of public finance and federal securities laws applicable to the issuance of securities by the District. Article II: Review and Approval of Official Statements Section 2.01. Responsibilities of Financing Group. The Financing Group shall prepare the Official Statement and confirm that the Official Statement: (a) has been reviewed and accurately states all information relating to the District, (b) confirm that any information in the Official Statement other than the information described in the previous clause (a) will be addressed by a closing certificate or opinion by an appropriate person, (c) contains a description of any failures of the District during the last five yars to comply with its continuing disclosure undertakings; and (d) is in substantially final form and is in a form ready to be “substantially final” by the Board of Directors, as evidenced by a Certificate executed and delivered by a member of the Financing Group pursuant to Rule 15c2-12, promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Financing Group shall have at least one all-hands meeting or conference call to review the Official Statement. Section 2.02. Responsibilities of General Counsel. The General Counsel (or a designee) shall review the Official Statement and shall draft for the Official Statement descriptions of (i) any material current, pending or threatened litigation, (ii) any material settlements or court orders and (iii) any other legal issues that are material information for purposes of the Official Statement. Section 2.03. Responsibilities of Controller and Chief Financial Officer. The Controller and Chief Financial Officer shall review the Official Statement, identify any material difference in presentation of financial information from the Financial Statements and ensure there are no misstatements or Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06 Page 5 of 7 omissions of material information in any sections that contain descriptions of information prepared by the Controller and/or Chief Financial Officer or other Contributors or of relevance to the finances of the District. In addition, the Controller and/or Chief Financial Officer shall determine whether the District’s then-available Financial Statements are appropriate to be included in the Official Statement and whether to seek the consent of the District’s auditor to include the Financial Statements in the Official Statement. Section 2.04. Review by Disclosure Working Group. Following receipt of the Official Statement from the Financing Group, the Disclosure Working Group shall evaluate the Official Statement for accuracy and compliance with federal and state securities laws, and shall, have an opportunity to ask questions of the Financing Group and of any Contributor or other person who reviewed or drafted any section of the Official Statement. The Disclosure Working Group may direct or request revisions and/or may instruct the Financing Group to solicit contributions from additional Contributors, as they deem necessary or appropriate. Section 2.05. Approval by Disclosure Working Group. Approval of the Official Statement by the Disclosure Working Group shall be evidenced by delivery of the Official Statement to the General Manager for docketing for a meeting of the Board of Directors as provided in Section 2.07. Section 2.06. Submission of Official Statements to Board of Directors for Approval. As part of the docketing process, the General Manager shall submit all Preliminary Official Statements to the Board of Directors for approval using a staff report that includes the information in the template attached as Attachment C to these Disclosure Procedures. The approval of an Official Statement by the Board of Directors shall be docketed as a new business matter and shall not be approved as a consent item. The Board of Directors shall undertake such review as deemed necessary, following consultation with the Controller, to fulfill the responsibilities of the Board of Directors under applicable federal and state securities laws. In this regard, the Controller shall consult with the District’s disclosure counsel to the extent necessary. Article III: Continuing Disclosure Filings Section 3.01. Overview. Under the continuing disclosure undertakings the District has entered into in connection with its debt offerings, the District is required each year to file Annual Reports with the Electronic Municipal Market Access (“EMMA”) system maintained by the MSRB in accordance with such undertakings. Such Annual Reports are required to include certain updated financial and operating information, and the District’s audited financial statements. The District is also required under its continuing disclosure undertakings to file notices of certain events (as summarized in Attachment B to these Disclosure Prodcedures) with EMMA. Section 3.02. Financial Statements. The Chief Financial Officer shall submit the District’s audited financial statements (“Financial Statements”), as they are available, to the Disclosure Working Group. The Disclosure Working Group shall review the audited Financial Statements according to these Disclosure Procedures and, when reviewed and approved for disclosure, shall transmit the audited Financial Statements to the Board of Directors. Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06 Page 6 of 7 If the District does not have audited Financial Statements available in time to file the Annual Report, the Chief Financial Officer shall submit the District’s unaudited financial statements as provided in each specific continuing disclosure undertaking. Section 3.03. Annual Reports. The Disclosure Coordinator shall ensure that the preparation of the District’s Annual Report shall commence in enough time so that they are filed no later than 210 days following the end of the fiscal year of the District, or as otherwise required under each specific continuing disclosure undertaking. Before any Annual Report is submitted to EMMA, the Disclosure Coordinator shall review outstanding continuing disclosure undertakings, prepare a checklist of information to be updated, supervise the preparation of the Annual Report, and confer with the Disclosure Working Group as needed regarding the content and accuracy of any such report. Section 3.04. Disclosure of Listed Events. Pursuant to Rule 15c2-12(b)(5)(i)(C), the District is obligated to disclose to the MSRB notice of certain specified events with respect to the District’s securities (a “Listed Event”). Each member of the Disclosure Working Group shall notify the other members of the Disclosure Working Group if he or she becomes aware of the occurrence of any of the Listed Events listed in the District’s continuing disclosure undertakings. The Disclosure Working Group may meet to discuss the event and to determine, in consultation with disclosure counsel to the extent determined by the Disclosure Coordinator, whether a filing is required or is otherwise desirable. If such a filing is deemed necessary, the Disclosure Coordinator shall cause a notice of the Listed Event (a “Listed Event Notice”) that complies with Rule 15c2-12 to be prepared, and the Disclosure Coordinator shall file or cause to be filed the Listed Event Notice as required by Rule 15c2-12. Article IV: Public Statements Regarding Financial Information Section 4.01. Financial Information. Whenever the District makes statements or releases information relating to its finances to the public that are reasonably expected to reach investors and the trading markets (including, without limitation, all Listed Event Notices, statements in the audited Financial Statements, and other financial reports and statements of the District), the District is obligated to ensure that such statements and information are complete, true, and accurate in all material respects. The Chief Financial Officer shall have primary responsibility for ensuring that such financial statements and information are accurate and not misleading in any material respect. Article V: Miscellaneous Section 5.01. Documents to be Retained. The Disclosure Coordinator, working with the District Clerk as needed, shall be responsible for retaining records demonstrating compliance with these Disclosure Procedures. The Disclosure Coordinator shall retain an electronic or paper file (“Deal File”) for each Annual Report and notice of Listed Events filed or caused to be filed by the District. Each Deal File shall include final versions of Disclosure Documents, the transcript of proceedings prepared in connection with the issuance of financial instruments. The Deal File shall be maintained in a central depository for a period equal to the later of the date of maturity or defeasance of the securities referenced in the Disclosure Document. Section 5.02. Waivers. In addition to the General Manager’s authority to adopt an Administrative Procedure to make this Board Policy more specific, any provision of this Board Policy or any related administrative procedure may be waived at any time by the General Manager, with the written confirmation to the members of the Disclosure Working Group. This authority to waive a provision of this policy is triggered only if such waiver is necessary for timely and effective compliance with disclosure laws. Any waivers made under this provision shall be reported to the Board of Directors, with Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06 Page 7 of 7 conforming revisions recommended for the Board’s consideration at the next update of this Board Policy and no later than within three months of implementation of such waiver. Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06(a) Board Policy 3.06 ATTACHMENT A LIST OF DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS, TO BE AMENDED AS NECESSARY 1. Preliminary and final official statements, private placement memoranda and remarketing memoranda relating to the District’s securities, together with any supplements. 2. Financial Statements. 3. Filings made by the District with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, whether made pursuant to a continuing disclosure undertaking to which the District is a party or otherwise. 4. Press releases and other information distributed by or on behalf of the District for public dissemination to the extent that such releases are reasonably expected, in the determination of the Disclosure Working Group, to reach investors and the trading markets for municipal securities. 5. Rating agency presentations. 6. Postings on the investor information section of the District’s website, if any. 7. Such portions of the District’s published adopted annual budget as the Disclosure Working Group determines to be appropriate. 8. Any other communications that are reasonably expected, in the determination of the Disclosure Working Group, to reach investors and the trading markets for municipal securities. Amendments: [Date] Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06(b) Board Policy 3.06 ATTACHMENT B LISTED EVENTS Occurrence of any of the following events require the District to make a filing on EMMA within ten (10) business days of their occurrence: 1. principal and interest payment delinquencies 2. unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulty 3. unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulty 4. substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform 5. adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other events affecting the tax-exempt status of the security 6. tender offers 7. defeasances 8. rating changes 9. bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person The occurrence if any of the following events require the District to file a notice on EMMA within ten (10 days after their occurrence, if they are determined to be material by the Disclosure Working Group: 1. non-payment related defaults 2. modifications to the rights of security holders 3. bond calls 4. release, substitution or sale of property securing repayments of the securities 5. the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms 6. appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee Attachment 1 Board Policy 3.06(d) Board Policy 3.06 ATTACHMENT C Information to be Included in the Staff Report Transmitting Official Statement by General Manager to Board of Directors Transmittal staff report shall include, but is not limited to, the following information: The attached Preliminary Official Statement has been reviewed and approved for transmittal to the Board by the District’s Disclosure Working Group. The distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement by the District is subject to federal securities laws, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These laws require the Preliminary Official Statement to include all facts that would be material to an investor in the Obligations. Material information is information that there is a substantial likelihood would have actual significance in the deliberations of the reasonable investor when deciding whether to buy or sell the Obligations. If the Board of Directors concludes that the Preliminary Official Statement includes all facts that would be material to an investor in the Obligations, it must adopt a resolution that authorizes staff to execute a certificate to the effect that the Preliminary Official Statement has been “deemed final.” The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the agency with regulatory authority over the District’s compliance with the federal securities laws, has issued guidance as to the duties of the elected body with respect to its approval of the Preliminary Official Statement. In its “Report of Investigation in the Matter of County of Orange, California as it Relates to the Conduct of the Members of the Board of Supervisors” (Release No. 36761 / January 24, 1996) (the “Release”), the SEC stated that, if a member of the elected body has knowledge of any facts or circumstances that an investor would want to know about prior to investing in the Obligations, whether relating to their repayment, tax-exempt status, undisclosed conflicts of interest with interested parties, or otherwise, he or she should endeavor to discover whether such facts are adequately disclosed in the Preliminary Official Statement. In the Release, the SEC stated that the steps that a member of the elected body take include becoming familiar with the Preliminary Official Statement and questioning staff and consultants about the disclosure of such facts. Section 1. Purpose of Financing. Section 2. Documents for Approval; Security for the Obligations. Section 3. Risks Relating to Repayment and Tax-Exempt Status of the Obligations. Section 4. Requested Approvals. Attachment 1 November 18, 2020 Board Meeting 20-27 SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Wednesday, November 4, 2020 The Board of Directors conducted this meeting in accordance with California Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20. All Board members and staff participated via teleconference. DRAFT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING President Holman called the special meeting of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members Present: Jed Cyr, Larry Hassett, Karen Holman, Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Yoriko Kishimoto, Curt Riffle, and Pete Siemens Members Absent: None Staff Present: General Manager Ana Ruiz, General Counsel Hilary Stevenson, Assistant General Manager Brian Malone, Assistant General Manager Susanna Chan, Chief Financial Officer Stefan Jaskulak, Public Affairs Manager Kori Skinner, Public Affairs Specialist II Cydney Bieber President Holman announced this meeting is being held in accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order allowing Board members to participate remotely. The District has done its best to conduct a meeting where everyone has an opportunity to listen to the meeting and to provide comment. The public has the opportunity to comment on the agenda, and the opportunity to listen to this meeting through the internet or via telephone. This information can be found on the meeting agenda, which was physically posted at the District’s Administrative Office, and on the District website. President Holman described the process and protocols for the meeting. 1. Website Structural Upgrade and Design Refresh Project Update (R-20-132) General Manager Ana Ruiz commented on the website upgrades possible using a new platform that will allow for more functionality and graphics. Public Affairs Manager Kori Skinner provided additional information on the ability of the new website to improve functionality for mobile users and to follow best management practices. Meeting 20-27 Page 2 Public Affairs Specialist II Cydney Bieber provided the staff presentation describing the technological needs for the updated website to continue to allow for security updates. The website was last updated in 2015, and the upgrades will allow for new interactive features and graphics. Due to the high number of mobile users, the new website structure will be better viewed on mobile devices. Ms. Bieber described the design process to represent potential site users and interview website stakeholders. The website layout will be designed to meet the needs of community members, create pathways to encourage exploration, and have an increased ability to incorporate photos, graphics, and video. Ms. Bieber displayed various pages from the current District website and explained how these will be updated in the upgraded website. Director Kishimoto requested clarification regarding the search function for the District’s website and whether the public will be able to search for Board meeting documents, meeting minutes, etc. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported as a part of the records management program and selection of an electronic document management system, past District records will be digitized and accessible from the District’s website. The vendor for the electronic document management system will be selected in early 2021, and following implementation of the document management system staff will work to integrate the District’s records and ability to search the records within the website. Director Kishimoto inquired regarding including links to outside sites, such as trail reviews, from the District’s website. Public Affairs Manager Kori Skinner commented the District does not have a way to monitor outside website to ensure the information is accurate, so the types of links that would be provided are limited. Director Riffle suggested linking to other partner organizations which may help users locate open space areas to visit even when not a part of the District’s preserves. Ms. Skinner reported the District created a page on the site related to regional open space options to help guide visitors to various options for visiting open space. President Holman suggested making this regional page more prominent on the District’s website. President Holman inquired regarding the possibility of members of the public to opt into alerts from the District, such if a preserve were closed due to an emergency. Ms. Skinner stated this functionality is being included in the website to allow visitors to opt into notifications, such as for public meetings, but currently it is not planned for public safety alerts. Public comment opened at 5:57 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported no public comments were submitted for this item. Public comment closed at 5:57 p.m. No Board action required. Meeting 20-27 Page 3 ADJOURNMENT President Holman adjourned the special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at 5:58 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT – CLOSED SESSION President Holman announced the Board would convene into closed session at 6:01 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth reported no public comments were submitted for the closed session items. ROLL CALL Members Present: Jed Cyr, Larry Hassett, Karen Holman, Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Yoriko Kishimoto, Curt Riffle, and Pete Siemens Members Absent: None Staff Present: Human Resources Manager Candice Basnight and Outside Counsel Gary Baum 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) Title of Employee: General Counsel General Manager CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS. Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency designated representatives: Board Appointee Evaluation Committee (Directors Holman, Riffle, and Siemens) Unrepresented Employees: General Counsel General Manager 2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Government Code Section 54957(b)(1) Title of Employee: General Manager ADJOURNMENT President Holman adjourned the special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at 7:02 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT President Holman called the special meeting of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to order at 7:14 p.m. Meeting 20-27 Page 4 ROLL CALL Members Present: Jed Cyr, Larry Hassett, Karen Holman, Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Yoriko Kishimoto, Curt Riffle, and Pete Siemens Members Absent: None Staff Present: General Manager Ana Ruiz, General Counsel Hilary Stevenson, Assistant General Manager Brian Malone, Assistant General Manager Susanna Chan, Chief Financial Officer Stefan Jaskulak, Budget & Analysis Manager Mike Bower, Public Affairs Manager Kori Skinner, Public Affairs Specialist II Leigh Ann Gessner, Natural Resources Manager Kirk Lenington, Senior Resource Management Specialist Coty Sifuentes- Winter, IPM Coordinator Tom Reyes, Grants Program Manager Deborah Hirst, Land & Facilities Manager Brandon Stewart, Senior Property Management Specialist Omar Smith, Engineering & Construction Manager Jason Lin, Senior Capital Project Manager Tanisha Werner, Chief Ranger Matt Anderson, Management Analyst II Deborah Bazar, District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth announced this meeting is being held in accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order allowing Board members to participate remotely. The District has done its best to conduct a meeting where everyone has an opportunity to listen to the meeting and to provide comment. The public has the opportunity to comment on the agenda, and the opportunity to listen to this meeting through the internet or via telephone. This information can be found on the meeting agenda, which was physically posted at the District’s Administrative Office, and on the District website. Ms. Woodworth described the process and protocols for the meeting. REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION President Holman stated there was no reportable action taken in closed session. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Ms. Woodworth read the submitted public comments into the record. John Kunz shared comments in support of allowing Class 1 e-bikes on District trails, at least for senior citizens. Keith Kelsen commented on a recent protest he organized in support of allowing e-bikes on District trails and shared information gathered from those participating in the protest. Mr. Kelsen stated the impact of e-bikes is similar to those of standard mountain bikes and encouraged the District to open trails to e-bikes. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion: Director Riffle moved, and Director Cyr seconded the motion to adopt the agenda. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 Meeting 20-27 Page 5 SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY • Introduction of Staff o Cindy Chu, Risk Management Analyst CONSENT CALENDAR Public comment opened at 7:22 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth read the submitted public comments into the record. Tom Calderwood shared comments in support of Item 5 regarding invasive species treatment. He also stated more focus should be placed on removing non-native eucalyptus trees; replacing removed invasive species with trees suitable to the locations; and involving District Advanced Resource Management Stewards (ARMs) volunteers with habitat restoration. Public comment closed at 7:23 p.m. Director Siemens pulled Item 6 from the Consent Calendar. Director Hassett requested clarification regarding Item 8 asking why the District is covering the cost of the demolition and not the tenant. General Counsel Hilary Stevenson stated the District’s property insurance applies and covers the damage and then seeks reimbursement from the tenant’s insurance provider. Motion: Director Kishimoto moved, and Director Cyr seconded the motion to approve the Consent Calendar, except for Item 6. ROLL CALL VOTE:7-0-0 1. Approve October 21, 2020 and November 4, 2020 Minutes 2. Approve Claims List 3. Quarter 1 Proposed Budget Amendments to the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2021 (R-20-140) General Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the proposed Quarter 1 budget amendments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. 4. Award of Contract to EDX Exhibits for the Administrative Office Interpretive Elements Project (R-20-133) General Manager’s Recommendation: Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with EDX Exhibits for $78,000 for interpretive planning and design of new public interpretive elements for the future Administrative Office at 5050 El Camino Real in Los Altos. Meeting 20-27 Page 6 5. Award of Contract for District-Wide Habitat Enhancement through Invasive Species Treatment (R-20-135) General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with Hanford ARC of Petaluma, California in the amount of $275,000 for one year of invasive species management services. 2. Authorize the General Manager to extend the contract for three additional consecutive years, if the program achieves specific success criteria, at an annual cost of up to $275,000 for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $1,100,000 over the four-year term. 6. Award of Contract with Applied Technology & Science for Planning Services, Feasibility Assessment, and Preparation of Habitat Restoration Plans within the Irish Ridge Area of Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve (R-20-134) General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Authorize the General Manager to contract with Applied Technology & Science (ATS), to provide Phase I environmental planning and biological consulting services to determine the feasibility and maximum net natural resource benefits of restoring a section of Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve for a base contract amount of $42,037. 2. If the completion of the Phase I items in the base contract demonstrates high long-term net natural resources benefits at a reasonable price for the planned restoration work, authorize the General Manager to amend the contract to complete Phase II habitat restoration plans, for an additional not-to-exceed amount of $57,230. 3. Authorize a 10% contingency for each Phase of work for a total amount of $9,927 ($4,204 for Phase I and $5,723 for Phase II) to cover unforeseen complexities or additional biological survey needs, for a grand total contract amount not-to-exceed $109,194. Item 6 was heard after the Consent Calendar. Director Siemens inquired regarding the potential cost of providing work at the site to be determined by the feasibility study. Senior Resources Management Specialist Coty Sifuentes-Winter explained the feasibility study will help ensure District funds are spent wisely to provide the best return on investment in restoring the area. Director Siemens expressed concern regarding the recommended approach to the project and the recommendation of a 10% contingency for the contract. Motion: Director Kishimoto moved, and Director Riffle seconded the motion to approve the General Manager’s recommendation. ROLL CALL VOTE:7-0-0 7. Application for Grant Funding from the California Department of Parks and Recreation’s Proposition 68 Per Capita Grant Program (R-20-136) General Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the General Manager to submit an application for Proposition 68 Per Capita Program grant funding from the California Meeting 20-27 Page 7 Department of Parks and Recreation and to negotiate a grant funding agreement(s) for $1,214,590 in Per Capita funding. 8. Award of Contract to TKO General Engineering & Construction for Demolition of Two Unoccupied, Fire Damaged Accessory Structures and Repair of a Retaining Wall at 895 La Honda Road, Woodside, CA 94026 in Thornewood Open Space Preserve (R-20-137) General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Approve the demolition of two fire damaged accessory structures and the replacement of a retaining wall that sustained extensive fire damage at Thornewood Open Space Preserve and determine that these actions are categorically exempt under CEQA. 2. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with TKO General Engineering & Construction, of Woodside, California to complete the structures demolition and retaining wall repair for a base amount of $49,680. 3. Authorize a 15% contingency of $7,452 to be reserved for unanticipated issues, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $57,132. 9. Award of Contract to Evaluate and Prepare Structural and Engineering Repairs Options to Repurpose an Existing Structure as Ranger Housing at Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve (R-20-126) General Manager’s Recommendation: 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc., of Emeryville, California for a base contract amount of $67,500. 2. Authorize a 10% contingency of $6,750 to cover unforeseen conditions for a total contract amount not-to-exceed $74,250. BOARD BUSINESS / PUBLIC HEARING 10. Award of Contract with SWCA Environmental Consultants to provide Environmental Planning, Design, and Technical Analysis for the Feasibility Studies and Conceptual Designs of the Purisima-to-the-Sea Trail and Parking Area Project (R-20-129) Senior Planner Gretchen Laustsen provided the staff presentation describing the conceptual trail connection, described the proposed feasibility study and contract scope, and grant funding available for the project. Director Hassett praised the selection of SWCA for this contract due to their knowledge of the area and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions because they are local. Director Kishimoto suggested additional trail work could be completed by District staff. Ms. Laustsen reported District staff will lay out the trail alignment from the parking lot, but due to the compressed timeline, additional assistance will be needed from consultants to avoid impacting District workloads. Ms. Ruiz stated this portion of the work is also being funded by an external grant. Director Riffle inquired regarding potential impact on agriculture in the area by introducing public access. Meeting 20-27 Page 8 Ms. Laustsen reported the study will directly address the effects of public access on agriculture. Director Cyr stated introducing public access to the area may help visitors better understand the importance of agriculture. Director Siemens inquired regarding the conceptual trail alignment and its proximity to the California Coastal Trail and parking area. Ms. Laustsen stated that topography of the area and current uses prevent a direct connection to the Coastal Trail and parking area, so connector trails and crossings will be needed. Public comment opened at 8:10 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth read the submitted comments into the record. Jim Sullivan commented in support of allowing bicycle riders to ride from Highway 35 to the coast on dirt trails and asked the Board to allow bicycles on Irish Ridge Trail. Ron Sturgeon opposed the project stating the California Coastal Conservancy’s trail alignment did not cross South Cowell Ranch and instead crosses District property. Mr. Sturgeon opposed the trail crossing the South Cowell Ranch due to its negative impact on the ranch. Public comment closed at 8:12 p.m. Ms. Ruiz stated the District’s policy allows for making regional trails multi-use trails, which the Board may decide to consider now that the Irish Ridge Trail will be a regional trail. Real Property Manager Mike Williams commented the trail alignment has not been determined, and when the Coastal Conservancy considered the grant funding, the District and Peninsula Open Space Trust had not yet purchased South Cowell Ranch. Director Kersteen-Tucker spoke in support of considering making the connector trail a multi-use trail. Director Kersteen-Tucker inquired how the stakeholders will be identified for the public outreach process. Ms. Laustsen stated staff will first identify public concerns, including trail use, traffic and safety concerns, etc., and will then seek public input on these and other topics that may arise. Director Riffle spoke in support of working with various user groups and also soliciting input from residents on the coastside and bayside areas of the District. President Holman suggested separate trails for hiking and cycling use. Assistant General Manager Brian Malone stated trails can be designed for multi-use, and the current site has existing constraints that may prevent building two trails. President Holman commented on the need to balance the public’s interest in visiting the preserve and the impact on the environment and inquired how this may be weighed at this site. Meeting 20-27 Page 9 Planning Manager Jane Mark stated the Science Advisory Panel plans to study this topic to better understand recreational uses and the effects on natural resources, which can inform the District’s design of parking capacity. Motion: Director Kersteen-Tucker moved, and Director Siemens seconded the motion to: 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with SWCA Environmental Consultants of Half Moon Bay, CA to complete the Feasibility Studies and Conceptual Designs of the Purisima-to-the-Sea Trail and Parking Area Project for a base amount of $261,000. 2. Authorize an approximate 10% contingency of $26,000 to cover unforeseen tasks beyond the current scope for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $287,000. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 11. Radio System Assessment Report and Recommendations (R-20-110) Mr. Malone commented on District staff’s recent work on the CZU fire and the importance of the radio system to allow staff to properly perform their jobs, often in remote locations. Management Analyst II Deborah Bazar described the District’s radio system, including radio tower locations, and the radio system assessment report and finding. The District’s radio system requires upgrading due to equipment reaching end of life, equipment that is outdated, and coverage issues on District lands. Greg Forrest with Forrest Telecom Engineering, Inc., further outlined the findings of the radio system assessment report and provided recommendations needed to maintain a reliable and operational radio system. Additional recommended actions will improve coverage and further enhance performance and reliability. Ms. Bazar described the costs for the required and recommended items. The Board members requested and received clarification regarding various aspects of the District’s radio system. Director Siemens commented the analog administrative radio system is also outdated and should be converted to a digital system when the patrol system is upgraded to a digital system. Mr. Forrest stated he does not see a downside to upgrading the District’s administrative radio system to a digital system. Director Riffle inquired regarding the life of the proposed upgraded system. Mr. Forrest reported the typical useful life of a system is approximately ten to fifteen years. Members of the Board spoke in support of upgrading the administrative radio system to a digital system. President Holman inquired regarding the cost of software upgrades to the system and whether they would be included in the purchase. Meeting 20-27 Page 10 Mr. Forrest stated most manufacturers will include two to three years of firmware upgrades in the purchase with options to purchase additional years of support. President Holman asked staff to include the costs of technical support and firmware upgrades when the contract returns for Board approval. President Holman suggested the District’s old equipment be provided to another organization or agency that would be able to use it rather than it being sold as surplus electrical equipment. Public comment opened at 9:44 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth announced no public comments were submitted to be read into the record. Public comment closed at 9:44 p.m. Motion: Director Siemens moved, and Director Cyr seconded the motion to direct the General Manager to plan for the implementation of the Radio System upgrade and improvement recommendations, as presented in the staff report and also include upgrade of the administrative radio system to a digital system as part of the radio system upgrade, to improve coverage, reliability, functionality, and compatibility with local emergency response agencies, as well as address end-of-life concerns that affect the ongoing maintenance and use of the current system at a total implementation cost over the next two fiscal years estimated at $2.51M. Friendly Amendment: Director Kishimoto suggested modifying the motion to direct the General Manager to plan for the implementation of the radio system upgrade because the project budget will still need to be approved by the Board. Directors Siemens and Cyr accepted the friendly amendment. Friendly Amendment: President Holman suggested including direction to staff to provide information, to the extent feasible, regarding anticipated maintenance costs following implementation of the radio system upgrades and improvements. Director Siemens declined to accept the friendly amendment. Friendly Amendment: President Holman suggested including direction to staff to consider what other options exist for the District’s current equipment, such as use by other agencies or organizations, and present those options to the Board when the item returns for Board consideration. Directors Siemens and Cyr accepted the friendly amendment. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 12. First Reading of the Board Compensation Ordinance (R-20-139) General Counsel Hilary Stevenson provided the staff presentation describing the history of Board compensation and similar actions taken by other agencies. Ms. Stevenson outlined the Meeting 20-27 Page 11 regulations and procedures required for this item, including publishing notice of the item twice in a newspaper, holding a public hearing, and the ordinance going into effect sixty days after adoption. Director Siemens requested clarification regarding the classification of the Board members by the IRS as employees and the impacts of that classification. Ms. Stevenson stated this topic may be better discussed at the Board’s January meeting as part of the annual discussion of the number of monthly meetings to be compensated. Director Riffle stated the Board’s raise should be consistent with raises provided to staff, which is 3%. Director Hassett stated the Board’s compensation should be allowed to catch up to a reasonable rate, after which the increase can be 3%. Director Kersteen-Tucker stated the Board’s compensation may be an important incentive to help support diversity of those serving on the Board and future Board members may rely on that compensation to serve on the Board. President Holman commented that compensation may make the option to serve a more viable option for potential Board members to serve on the Board. Director Kishimoto stated her support for increasing Board compensation by 5%, and at a later date the Board may want to consider which meetings and events are compensable. Public hearing opened at 10:11 p.m. District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth announced no public comments were submitted to be read into the record. Public comment closed at 10:11 p.m. Motion: Director Siemens moved, and Director Siemens seconded the motion to: 1. Waive reading and introduce an ordinance increasing Board compensation from $100.00 to $105.00 per meeting pursuant to Public Resources Code section 5536. 2. Hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance. 3. Direct the General Manager and General Counsel to prepare the ordinance for second reading at the December 9, 2020 Board meeting. ROLL CALL VOTE: 7-0-0 Director Hassett commented that the District could look at comparable agencies with similar numbers of meetings per year to help determine the “market rate” of Board compensation. INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM • Administrative Office Project – Contractor Pre-Qualification Process Meeting 20-27 Page 12 Director Hassett spoke in favor of using a local contractor for the project. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS A. Committee Reports Director Kersteen-Tucker reported the Legislative, Funding, and Public Affairs Committee (LFPAC) met yesterday to discuss the scope of the 50th Anniversary celebration and events and the proposed funding agreements with the Umunhum Conservancy and Stephen C. Schott for funding repairs of the Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower. B. Staff Reports District Clerk Jennifer Woodworth announced staff will be sending the Board members information regarding required harassment prevention training and asked the Board members to complete the training by January 31, 2021. Mr. Malone provided an update on the LFPAC discussion regarding a donation by the Umunhum Conservancy. Mr. Malone announced the Kennedy Trail at Sierra Azul will be closed on Thanksgiving to discourage gathering by visitors for an annual bike ride that occurs, which is inconsistent with current COVID-19 protocols. Assistant General Manager Susanna Chan provided an update on the Rancho San Antonio stakeholder meetings regarding the Rancho San Antonio multimodal study project. Ms. Ruiz reported the Saratoga to the Skyline Trail grand opening video has been posted to the City of Saratoga’s website and invited the Board to view the video. C. Director Reports Director Kishimoto announced she plans to pursue the special district delegate position on the Santa Clara LAFCO Board of Directors and requested the Board’s support. ADJOURNMENT President Holman adjourned the special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District at 10:37 p.m. ________________________________ Jennifer Woodworth, MMC District Clerk MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT MEETING # 20-29 MEETING DATE: December 09, 2020 Fiscal Year 19-20 EFT:57.86% Fiscal Year 18-19 EFT:29.44% Payment Number Payment Type Payment Date Notes Vendor No. and Name Invoice Description Payment Amount 2635 EFT 12/04/2020 12111 - Agbayani Construction Corporation South Area Field Office Renovation Project - October 2020 571,730.58 2617 EFT 11/27/2020 11998 - Hanford Applied Restoration & Conservation Mindego Ranch Ponds Enhancement Project - October 2020 258,087.24 2628 EFT 11/27/2020 11303 - Santa Clara County FireSafe Council Los Trancos Page Mill Road Eucalyptus Removal Project - 5/1/20 - 9/30/20 198,050.80 2588 EFT 11/20/2020 12086 - Coastwide Environmental Technologies, Inc.Alma Demolition and Abatement Project - September 2020 136,325.00 2638 EFT 12/04/2020 11457 - Andreini Brothers Inc ADA Barrier Removal Project thru 10/31/20 115,055.11 2623 EFT 11/27/2020 12146 - Paine Construction Inc.Repainting of Red Barn 47,000.00 2613 EFT 11/27/2020 11238 - CXT Incorporated ADA Barrier Removal Project CXT Vault Restrooms 41,437.00 2608 EFT 11/27/2020 *12052 - 4984 EL Camino LLC A02/A03/A04 Rent - December 2020 36,678.00 2599 EFT 11/20/2020 12013 - Rincon Consultants, Inc.Madonna Creek Ranch Remediation - 8/1/20 - 9/30/20 31,069.17 2627 EFT 11/27/2020 11432 - San Mateo County Resource Conserv. Dist.Santa Cruz Mountain Stewardship Network Payment 20-21 30,000.00 2652 EFT 12/04/2020 12020 - Panorama Environmental, Inc.CEQA: Prescribed Fire Program Development - October 2020 29,016.25 2654 EFT 12/04/2020 11523 - PGA Design, Inc.Alma Cultural Landscape Rehab Plan / Hawthorns Public Acess - thru October 2020 26,614.76 2598 EFT 11/20/2020 11241 - Questa Engineering Corp.Design and Permitting Work for BCR Phase II Trails - September 2020 23,787.50 2611 EFT 11/27/2020 11898 - Bay Area Tree Specialists Eucalyptus Removal near Sequoias (5)20,900.00 2642 EFT 12/04/2020 10546 - Ecological Concerns, Inc.Habitat Enhancements at Fremont Older & Picchetti Ranch - October 2020 18,751.90 81491 Check 11/13/2020 11772 - Ahern Rentals, Inc.Equipment Rentals - JD650 Dozer/Roller/Excavator - 9/21/20 - 10/27/20 18,179.30 81514 Check 11/27/2020 10463 - Dell Business Credit 6 monitors, 2 rugged laptops & 6 normal laptops 17,920.67 2616 EFT 11/27/2020 11593 - H.T. Harvey & Associates Alma College Bat Surveys - thru September 30, 2020 17,771.25 2610 EFT 11/27/2020 11470 - AECOM Technical Services Inc Hwy 17 Wildlife & Regional Trail Crossings & Trail Connections - 8/29/20 - 9/25/20 17,396.25 2620 EFT 11/27/2020 10064 - MCB Remodeling LLC Upgrades between Tenants at Mora B 17,250.00 2612 EFT 11/27/2020 10012 - Biosearch Environmental Consulting Bio On-Call, Task 3, Mindego Ponds Project - 8/1/20 - 10/31/20 14,455.10 2587 EFT 11/13/2020 *10216 - Valley Oil Company Fuel for District Vehicles 13,283.81 2629 EFT 11/27/2020 12142 - Shellco General Contractor Inc DHF White Barn Structural Stabilization Project - October 2020 11,875.00 2615 EFT 11/27/2020 10005 - Grassroots Ecology Cooley Landing Native Planting Additional Work - 7/1/20 - 10/30/20 10,412.44 2646 EFT 12/04/2020 11906 - Law Offices of Gary M. Baum Legal Counsel Services / Legal Services South Cowell - October 2020 10,118.50 2647 EFT 12/04/2020 10791 - LSA Associates, Inc.CEQA & Regulatory Permit/Alternatives Analysis RWQCB Permit/Architectural Monitoring 9,506.50 2582 EFT 11/13/2020 12107 - San Francisco Estuary Institute Science Advisory Panel - September 2020 8,928.18 2568 EFT 11/13/2020 11898 - Bay Area Tree Specialists Tree Service - Prune and Remove Tan Oaks (3) / IPM Eucalyptus Tree Removal (7)8,600.00 81529 Check 12/04/2020 11588 - RONALD SEEVER Construction - Livestock Fence - Mindego Lake Habitat Protection 8,350.00 2573 EFT 11/13/2020 11748 - Environmental & Energy Consulting State Legislative Consulting & Lobbying - October 2020 7,860.41 2619 EFT 11/27/2020 10452 - Ifland Survey Right-of -Way Survey Services for Alpine Road 7,510.00 81530 Check 12/04/2020 10102 - Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP Wildland Fire Environmental Impact Report - August 2020 6,995.00 81492 Check 11/13/2020 11386 - Bob Murray & Associates L&F Manager Recruitment 6,651.35 2657 EFT 12/04/2020 12107 - San Francisco Estuary Institute Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Study Area Feasibility Study - 8/1/20 - 9/30/20 6,535.89 2653 EFT 12/04/2020 11823 - Periscope Intermediate Corporation BidSync source hosted eProcurement solution - 11/28/20 - 11/27/21 6,489.00 2607 EFT 11/20/2020 12050 - Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.DHF White Barn Structural Stabilization - thru 9/27/30 6,338.75 2656 EFT 12/04/2020 10099 - San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory American Badger & Burrowing Owl Habitat Suitability Study - 9/1/20 - 10/31/20 6,253.30 2645 EFT 12/04/2020 11593 - H.T. Harvey & Associates Alma College Bat Relocation & Habitat Replacement thru 10/31/20 6,252.33 2584 EFT 11/13/2020 12117 - Signet Testing Laboratories, Inc.SAO Special Inspection Services - 8/31/20 - 9/11/20 6,161.58 2578 EFT 11/13/2020 10031 - Mills Design Updates to Measure AA poster/Covid-19 Safety Signs/Summer Newsletter/Preserve Signs 5,333.75 81525 Check 12/04/2020 10466 - BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL COUNCIL 2020-2021 Bay Area Ridge Trail Council Membership 5,000.00 81503 Check 11/20/2020 12010 - Garcia and Associates DH Manure Structure - Archaeological Monitor - 2/26/20 - 7/24/20 4,926.50 2659 EFT 12/04/2020 12082 - Sicular Environmental Consulting La Honda Forest Management Plan - October 2020 4,904.21 2655 EFT 12/04/2020 10295 - Rhus Ridge Association Road Maintenance Agreement (RSA)4,852.48 2593 EFT 11/20/2020 11748 - Environmental & Energy Consulting Consulting & Lobbying - August 2020 4,110.41 2603 EFT 11/20/2020 11055 - Systems for Public Safety Backgrounds for Ranger Candidates 4,000.00 81517 Check 11/27/2020 11141 - Jarvis Fay & Gibson LLP Legal Services Rendered - October 2020 3,682.50 2648 EFT 12/04/2020 11617 - MIG, Inc.ADA Plan Update - 8/1/20 - 9/30/20 3,272.50 81515 Check 11/27/2020 11701 - Eric Gouldsberry Art Direction Design and Production of 2019-20 BOC Guide / PAFR/CAFR 3,262.50 2597 EFT 11/20/2020 *10211 - Public Policy Advocates 2020 Monthly Fee - Legislative Advocacy Services for October 2020 3,230.00 81532 Check 12/04/2020 *10309 - Verizon Wireless Wireless - 10/13/20 - 11/12/20 3,115.68 2572 EFT 11/13/2020 10032 - Del Rey Building Maintenance Janitorial Services for AO, SAO, SFO, FFO, CAO 3,020.00 2651 EFT 12/04/2020 12146 - Paine Construction Inc.Patch the roof on the Red Barn 2,999.00 81502 Check 11/20/2020 10027 - CRESCO EQUIPMENT RENTALS SA - Excavator rental for dumpsite clean-up - 10/7/20 - 10/15/20 2,902.68 2660 EFT 12/04/2020 10307 - The Sign Shop Custom & Standard Operation Signs - "No E Bike ", "Fire Lane" - SFO 2,894.00 Electronic funds transfer (EFT) for accounts payable disbursements to reduce check printing and mailing, increase payment security, and ensure quicker receipt by vendors page 1 of 9 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT MEETING # 20-29 MEETING DATE: December 09, 2020 Fiscal Year 19-20 EFT:57.86% Fiscal Year 18-19 EFT:29.44% Payment Number Payment Type Payment Date Notes Vendor No. and Name Invoice Description Payment Amount Electronic funds transfer (EFT) for accounts payable disbursements to reduce check printing and mailing, increase payment security, and ensure quicker receipt by vendors 2649 EFT 12/04/2020 10031 - Mills Design Ads for HMB Farmers Market/RW Brochure/E-bike fact sheet 2,775.00 2570 EFT 11/13/2020 10022 - Concern Flat Quarterly Rate 10/01/20 - 12/31/20 2,541.50 81499 Check 11/20/2020 12131 - Bay Area Older Adults, Inc.Ravenswood Open Space Preserve Lunch & Learn - 10/8/20 2,500.00 81521 Check 11/27/2020 10472 - Sandra Sommer CA Riding & Hiking Trail Research & Summary Report Agreement #2 - October 2020 2,479.21 81526 Check 12/04/2020 12153 - California Sport Design LLC Storm Tech Face Masks & carbon filters 2,403.50 2618 EFT 11/27/2020 10222 - Herc Rentals, Inc.Rental of Road Rock Roller/Compactor (BCR) - 10/16/20 - 10/30/20 2,399.51 81512 Check 11/27/2020 11772 - Ahern Rentals, Inc.JD 210 Rental (BCR) - 10/15/20 - 11/12/20 2,392.29 2643 EFT 12/04/2020 10187 - Gardenland Power Equipment New Stihl Pole Pruner, chainsaws for CAO, fuel cans, bar oil & litter pick-up sticks 2,382.73 2606 EFT 11/20/2020 10146 - Tires On The Go Tire Replacement for M227, M33 2,327.00 2639 EFT 12/04/2020 *11799 - Aztec Leasing, Inc.Printer/copier leases - 6 machines - November 2020 2,326.07 2661 EFT 12/04/2020 11914 - W-TRANS BCR Multi-Use Trail Crossings Traffic Studies - October 2020 2,300.00 2636 EFT 12/04/2020 *10128 - American Tower Corporation Repeater Lease - November 2020 2,049.96 2624 EFT 11/27/2020 *10212 - Pinnacle Towers LLC Tower Rental Skeggs Point – November 2020 2,042.30 2622 EFT 11/27/2020 10641 - Overlook Road Maintenance Assn Overlook Road Maintenance Annual Dues (ES)1,949.00 2632 EFT 11/27/2020 10152 - Tadco Supply Janitorial Supplies (RSA&CP)1,793.32 2633 EFT 11/27/2020 11780 - Terry J Martin Associates New South Area Field Office Facility, Campbell - October 2020 1,640.00 2630 EFT 11/27/2020 10302 - Stevens Creek Quarry, Inc.Base Rock for Phase II Trails (BCR)1,639.80 81507 Check 11/20/2020 12138 - San Mateo County Public Works Tabachnik Lot - split 1,500.00 81513 Check 11/27/2020 10843 - City of Los Altos Sewer Service Charge - 1st/2nd Installment 1,458.44 2658 EFT 12/04/2020 10793 - Sherwood Design Engineers Plan Revisions to Address SMC BLDG Permit Comments - thru October 31, 2020 1,402.50 2590 EFT 11/20/2020 11989 - Conifer Creative, Inc.Professional Services - 2021 Wall Calendar - initial design templates, layout, images 1,325.00 2586 EFT 11/13/2020 10307 - The Sign Shop Custom Signs - OSP (20)1,324.79 2585 EFT 11/13/2020 10302 - Stevens Creek Quarry, Inc.Drain & Base Rock (RSA & BCR)1,241.82 2641 EFT 12/04/2020 11318 - Confluence Restoration BCR Plant Installation & Maintenance - October 2020 1,200.00 2631 EFT 11/27/2020 11055 - Systems for Public Safety Backgrounds for Ranger Candidates 1,150.00 81495 Check 11/13/2020 10935 - Rice Trucking - Soil Farm Water Delivery at Toto - (3)1,113.03 2571 EFT 11/13/2020 11318 - Confluence Restoration Alma /Webb Creek Plant Maintenance - September 2020 1,110.00 2626 EFT 11/27/2020 11479 - Rootid, LLC Website maintenance - retainer hours 8 1,080.00 81524 Check 12/04/2020 11772 - Ahern Rentals, Inc.Mini excavator Rental (SFO) 10/27/20 - 10/30/20 1,065.88 81498 Check 11/20/2020 11772 - Ahern Rentals, Inc.JD 210 Rental (BCR) - 10/8/20 - 10/15/20 1,030.08 2640 EFT 12/04/2020 11898 - Bay Area Tree Specialists Contingency - Eucalyptus tree stump removal near Sequoias (1)1,000.00 2634 EFT 12/04/2020 10001 - Aaron's Septic Tank Service Vault Pumpout - Northridge & Purisima Creek 990.00 2583 EFT 11/13/2020 10136 - San Jose Water Company Water Service (RSACP) - 2 accounts 926.46 2650 EFT 12/04/2020 11270 - Municipal Maintenance Equipment Inc.T27 Vehicle Parts 853.82 81516 Check 11/27/2020 11551 - Green Team of San Jose Garbage Service (RSA) 842.13 2601 EFT 11/20/2020 12117 - Signet Testing Laboratories, Inc.SAO Special Inspection Services 777.92 81528 Check 12/04/2020 10935 - Rice Trucking - Soil Farm Water Delivery at Toto - (2)742.02 2604 EFT 11/20/2020 10152 - Tadco Supply GP/RSACP Restroom Supplies 738.77 81500 Check 11/20/2020 *10454 - California Water Service-949 Water Service (FFO)712.78 2589 EFT 11/20/2020 11013 - Confidence UST Services, Inc.New Diesel Tank Nozzle (FFO)700.95 2579 EFT 11/13/2020 10271 - Orlandi Trailer Inc M236 Tow hitch & accessories / T07 Repairs 662.95 2621 EFT 11/27/2020 10073 - Normal Data Permit/Contact Databases - October 2020 640.00 2605 EFT 11/20/2020 11895 - Timmons Group Inc Work Order and Asset Management - thru 7/31/2020 630.00 2592 EFT 11/20/2020 11699 - Dakota Press Proof samples of newsletters & trail brochures (Qty 24) / Postcards 4 versions (Qty 2000)553.90 81522 Check 11/27/2020 10959 - State Water Resources Control Board Ravenswood Bay Trail (2 41C387949) Index No: 418477 509.00 2609 EFT 11/27/2020 10001 - Aaron's Septic Tank Service Sanitation Service (PuR)495.00 81493 Check 11/13/2020 10135 - Praxair Distribution Inc Welding Supplies (FFO)478.82 2600 EFT 11/20/2020 *10136 - San Jose Water Company Water Service (SAO-Cristich) 473.53 2602 EFT 11/20/2020 10302 - Stevens Creek Quarry, Inc.Base Rock (BCR)430.76 81523 Check 11/27/2020 11852 - Western Exterminator Co.Annex/Garage rodent control 426.50 81497 Check 11/20/2020 12090 - Action Towing Towing Service for M210 412.50 2580 EFT 11/13/2020 10253 - Peterson Tractor Co.T-21 Repairs 375.02 81505 Check 11/20/2020 10935 - Rice Trucking - Soil Farm Water Delivery at Toto - 10/2/20 371.01 81504 Check 11/20/2020 11957 - MATTOX, JANIS Reimburse Tenant for water filters at Bechtel 370.98 81511 Check 11/27/2020 *12041 - A T & T Mobility (FirstNet)EOC Emergency phones- November 2020 355.47 page 2 of 9 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT MEETING # 20-29 MEETING DATE: December 09, 2020 Fiscal Year 19-20 EFT:57.86% Fiscal Year 18-19 EFT:29.44% Payment Number Payment Type Payment Date Notes Vendor No. and Name Invoice Description Payment Amount Electronic funds transfer (EFT) for accounts payable disbursements to reduce check printing and mailing, increase payment security, and ensure quicker receipt by vendors 81496 Check 11/13/2020 10324 - Rich Voss Trucking Inc Rock delivery trucking costs - SFO 350.00 2577 EFT 11/13/2020 12040 - JW Heating and Air Conditioning Repair Gas Heaters at Bergman Main 340.00 81501 Check 11/20/2020 10168 - Cintas Shop Towel Service (FFO & SFO)337.90 81519 Check 11/27/2020 10093 - Rene Hardoy AO Gardening Service 325.00 2574 EFT 11/13/2020 11151 - Fastenal Company Nuts & Bolts 312.59 81527 Check 12/04/2020 *11526 - Republic Services Monthly Garbage Service 16060 Skyline 299.04 2581 EFT 11/13/2020 12121 - Safety Management Consultation Services, Inc.Fall Protection Needs Assessment, Instruction, and Training 291.50 2569 EFT 11/13/2020 10328 - Brush Road Corporation Annual Road Maintenance Dues (BCR)280.00 2591 EFT 11/20/2020 11042 - County of Santa Clara Office of the Sheriff Live Scan - September 2020 276.00 81531 Check 12/04/2020 10338 - The Ed Jones Company, Inc Flat wallet badge - Lucas 270.06 81520 Check 11/27/2020 10182 - Royal Brass Inc T28 Hydraulic Parts / Parts for shop air compressor (FFO)264.07 2576 EFT 11/13/2020 10394 - Interstate Traffic Control Pro RSA/Rhus Ridge - sign parts & parking lot ground markers 260.02 2575 EFT 11/13/2020 10187 - Gardenland Power Equipment Stihl pole saw parts / chainsaw tools 211.94 81508 Check 11/20/2020 11671 - State Water Resources Control Board Renewal Fees for L031287 and L031288 200.00 81509 Check 11/20/2020 10201 - Turf & Industrial Equip. Co.P07 Repairs 192.53 2594 EFT 11/20/2020 12088 - GSL Fine Lithographers Business Card - 250 each of 5 Lots 189.87 2644 EFT 12/04/2020 12088 - GSL Fine Lithographers Business Card - 250 each of 5 Lots 189.87 81494 Check 11/13/2020 10176 - RE Borrmann's Steel Co Materials for Project (RSA)180.43 81518 Check 11/27/2020 11924 - Nomad Ecology Rare Plant Surveys for the Wildland Fire Resiliency Program 165.00 2625 EFT 11/27/2020 12060 - Preferred Alliance, Inc.11-20 Off-Site Participants Testing (13)134.68 2637 EFT 12/04/2020 10294 - AmeriGas - 0130 Propane at 16060 Skyline Blvd 99.42 2596 EFT 11/20/2020 10190 - MetroMobile Communications Radio Repair for M215 75.00 2595 EFT 11/20/2020 10119 - Kwik Key Lock & Safe Co Inc Mini Ex-Bobcat Door Keys 57.49 81510 Check 11/27/2020 11880 - A T & T (CALNET3)Mt. Um Safety Phone - 10/07/20 - 11/6/20 47.97 2614 EFT 11/27/2020 10169 - Foster Brothers Security Systems FFO - Keys 26.16 81506 Check 11/20/2020 11073 - SAN MATEO COUNTY CLERK RECORDER Conformed copy fees - PCR related 20.00 1,971,913.69 *Annual Claims **Hawthorn Expenses A### = Administrative Office Vehicle HC = Hendry's Creek P### = Patrol Vehicle SCNT = Stevens Creek Nature Trail AO2, AO3, AO4 = Leased Office Space HR = Human Resources PCR = Purisima Creek Redwoods SCS = Stevens Creek Shoreline Nature Area BCR = Bear Creek Redwoods IPM = Invasive Plant Maintenance PIC= Picchetti Ranch SFO = Skyline Field Office CAO = Coastal Area Office ISM = Invasive Species Management PR = Pulgas Ridge SG = Saratoga Gap CC = Coal Creek LH = La Honda Creek RR = Russian Ridge SJH = Saint Joseph's Hill DHF = Dear Hollow Farm LR = Long Ridge RR/MIN = Russian Ridge - Mindego Hill SR= Skyline Ridge ECdM = El Corte de Madera LT = Los Trancos RSA = Rancho San Antonio T### = Tractor or Trailer ES = El Sereno M### = Maintenance Vehicle RV = Ravenswood TC = Tunitas Creek FFO = Foothills Field Office MB = Monte Bello SA = Sierra Azul TH = Teague Hill FOOSP = Fremont Older Open Space Pres.MR = Miramontes Ridge SAO = South Area Outpost TW = Thornewood GP = General Preserve MSRB = Municipal Securities Rulemakin SAU = Mount Umunhum WH = Windy Hill Abbreviations page 3 of 9 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT CLAIMS REPORT Wells Fargo Credit Card - October 2020 MEETING # 20-29 MEETING DATE 12-09-20 GL Date Amount Description 11/9/2020 6,514.40 Rental of Climber Mower - 8/25/20 - 9/21/20 11/9/2020 4,275.00 Native plant for Russian Ridge 11/9/2020 3,610.44 Dell monitors x 12 11/9/2020 3,594.00 AB1825 Harassment Prevention Training Online - HR 11/9/2020 3,352.72 AutoDesk / AutoCAD Annual Subscription 10/2020 - 9/2021 11/9/2020 3,134.98 District phone service and SAO T1 internet - 9/16/20 - 10/15/20 11/9/2020 2,975.61 Vehicle Repair P101 11/9/2020 2,958.61 Debris Disposal from Clearing of Vegetation on the fire lines 11/9/2020 2,904.43 SFO equipment shed hopper pump wash 11/9/2020 2,546.22 2021 Midpen Calendar, 500 quantity 11/9/2020 2,526.30 Printing of Ordinance 20-01 11/9/2020 1,752.89 BCR Phase I encroachment permit fees + transaction fee 11/9/2020 1,655.00 Society for Human Resource Mgmt. DEI Classes - Basnight 11/9/2020 1,388.83 Construction screws, reflective tape, disposable gloves 11/9/2020 1,292.80 Redwood post for one way trail signs 11/9/2020 1,272.49 P116 Tire replacement 11/9/2020 1,250.00 Endnote software for NR department 1 yr 10/20 - 09/21 11/9/2020 1,209.40 Replacement of Fire shelters for fire crews - protective equip 11/9/2020 1,175.02 UPS battery supplies for FFO office and shop x 2 11/9/2020 939.72 AO Alarm Services - Protection One 11/9/2020 879.92 Side winder mower parts 11/9/2020 841.68 SFO Alarm Service - October 2020 11/9/2020 775.00 RWC Chamber of Commerce Progress Sem Reg - Kersteen-Tucker 11/9/2020 725.00 Nat'l Assoc Interpertation Conference / Cert Course - Smith 11/9/2020 700.00 SRE Years of Service $100 Amazon Gift Card - 7 employees 11/9/2020 666.15 SFO Equipment Shed 11/9/2020 659.59 Vehicle Repair M221 11/9/2020 650.00 Certified Interpretive Trainer Course - Tjosvold 11/9/2020 639.11 Uniform - OST Kandahar 11/9/2020 577.28 FOOSP - Sanitation Services - United Site Services 11/9/2020 557.82 SA/Kennedy Rd - Sanitation Services - United Site Services 11/9/2020 527.47 RSA/Rhus Ridge - Bike Rack for Parking Lot 11/9/2020 525.00 Internal Affairs Investigation Training - Perry 11/9/2020 477.41 Property research services - September 2020 11/9/2020 463.31 Restroom supplies 11/9/2020 459.90 Monthly Zoom Subscription for Board Meetings 11/9/2020 450.00 Web hosting - October 2020 11/9/2020 448.57 Sidewinder Mower parts 11/9/2020 448.36 ZERO repair 11/9/2020 434.18 SFO Tool cleaning 11/9/2020 425.00 SA-Mt Um - Rental of Pedestrian Canopy at Summit 11/9/2020 397.87 Sidewinder mower parts 11/9/2020 395.00 Nat'l Recreation & Park Assoc Virtual Annual Conference for GM 11/9/2020 388.29 Bear Creek Stable ADA Restroom Rental - September 2020 11/9/2020 388.29 Bear Creek Stable ADA Restroom Rental - October 2020 11/9/2020 388.29 Bear Creek Stable ADA restroom Rental - August 2020 11/9/2020 385.00 EMT Refresher Training - Perry 11/9/2020 385.00 EMT Refresher Training - Ingram 11/9/2020 381.49 T38 Winch Line for Chipper 11/9/2020 369.36 T38 Knives for Chipper 11/9/2020 363.17 SFO Recycle and garbage 11/9/2020 361.72 Lights for shop for LED upgrades 11/9/2020 361.00 Monthly rental for storage unit - October 2020 11/9/2020 350.00 Recruit Ad for Planner II - American Soc of Landscape Architects 11/9/2020 348.50 Trough near pen 11/9/2020 343.33 Programmer services-counter project using Visual Basic Language 11/9/2020 340.99 Restock of T-Posts 11/9/2020 336.00 Survey Monkey Subscription - 10/26/20 - 10/25/21 11/9/2020 320.50 Windy Hill eucalyptus removal CDFW project fee 11/9/2020 318.09 Herbicide 11/9/2020 310.57 Keyboard and mouse combos x 7 11/9/2020 306.30 Shop Supplies - tire inflation gun, cable ties, rachet strap 11/9/2020 300.00 Frames for preserve photos in AO lobby 11/9/2020 299.00 Job posting - Facilities Maintenance Spec. - Your member Careers 11/9/2020 295.00 Recruitment Ad for Planner II - American Planning Assoc. 11/9/2020 285.00 Annual Int'l Institute of Municipal Clks Membership - Woodworth 11/9/2020 283.76 DHF - Supplies for Chicken Room Extension 11/9/2020 276.98 SA-Mt Um - Fencing Rental at Summit - United Site Services 11/9/2020 273.13 ZERO Cargo racks 11/9/2020 270.00 IRWA 2020 membership fees - Leong 11/9/2020 267.49 AO Water Service - CA Water 11/9/2020 264.48 M236/F550 - Supplies for New Vehicle 11/9/2020 259.72 M202 New Batteries 11/9/2020 254.89 Backflow preventer repair 11/9/2020 250.00 SRE Raffle Prizes - $25 gift cards - 10 employees 11/9/2020 249.26 DHF - More Supplies for Chicken Room 11/9/2020 249.14 UTV battery charger 11/9/2020 244.07 BCR Stables - Flexible Drainage Pipe 11/9/2020 240.28 BCR Phase I encroachment permit fees + transaction fee 11/9/2020 219.00 Annual Membership to Society Human Resource Mgmt - Basnight 11/9/2020 218.00 LexisNexis Online Subscription - October 2020 11/9/2020 211.93 M236 - Supplies 11/9/2020 211.65 Email Marketing - October 2020 11/9/2020 208.00 APWA Professional Membership Dues 2020-21 S.Reeves 11/9/2020 208.00 APWA Professional Membership Dues 2020-21 T.Werner 11/9/2020 207.46 Shipping fees - Midpen web store - October 2020 11/9/2020 202.63 DHF - Supplies for Chicken Room Extension 11/9/2020 200.00 Monthly subscriptions for remote admin tool - Logmein 11/9/2020 199.42 M214 Battery 11/9/2020 195.49 M31 Flat repair 11/9/2020 191.73 Hand sanitizer for restrooms 11/9/2020 191.50 Paint, Concrete and Supplies 11/9/2020 175.83 M213 - Supplies 11/9/2020 168.92 Sharp Copies - Printer Costs - 8-29-20 - 9-28-20 11/9/2020 164.87 Safety Helmet Order Cancelled - Credit Next Statement 11/9/2020 162.81 Supplies for M222 11/9/2020 158.03 Battery charger for AO vehicles 11/9/2020 157.64 Heavy duty grease gun, buckets, slim jim & universal file handle 11/9/2020 155.71 Water Service for Rentals - CA Water 11/9/2020 154.78 Thornewood secondary structure demolition legal classified ad 11/9/2020 151.15 Clinometer for Trail Layout 11/9/2020 151.10 Surge protectors and mouse pads 11/9/2020 150.00 Leave No Trace Education Membership - 10/6/20 - 10/5/21 - Storey 11/9/2020 148.60 Hand sanitizer dispensers 11/9/2020 147.60 Gloves for volunteers - 10 pairs 11/9/2020 145.00 Drivers License Medical Recertification Fee - employee 11/9/2020 145.00 Driver License medical recertification - employee 11/9/2020 141.93 Door lock replacement re-key style 11/9/2020 141.58 HIghway 17 stickers Q200 11/9/2020 140.14 Pens, write in the rain memo pads 11/9/2020 139.80 M207 - Side Lumber for Dump Bed 11/9/2020 139.12 Pin flags and wood plant stakes for Mt Um planting 11/9/2020 130.50 Materials for Welding and Shop 11/9/2020 128.90 Filing cabinet 11/9/2020 124.84 Hand sanitizer foam - SFO 11/9/2020 122.00 Hotel reservation for lead supervisor training - Mackessy 11/9/2020 120.71 Rain boots for NR Newt Survey and other field visits 11/9/2020 120.64 Poison oak soap 11/9/2020 113.42 Battery for Honda 500 11/9/2020 108.89 Parts for broken clay sewer pipe 11/9/2020 108.50 ADA sign brackets 11/9/2020 103.90 M207 Tool and Supplies 11/9/2020 100.00 SRE Years of Service $100 Amazon Gift Card - 1 employee 11/9/2020 100.00 SRE Years of Service $100 Amazon Gift Card - 1 employee 11/9/2020 99.42 Propane at 16060 Skyline Blvd 11/9/2020 99.00 CEQA Training - Management Analyst II - Shaw 11/9/2020 99.00 Cultural Resources Evaluation in CEQA Webinar - Leong 11/9/2020 99.00 CEQA Resources Evaluation Training for J.Mark 11/9/2020 99.00 CEQA Resources Evaluation Training for A. Peth 11/9/2020 99.00 AO Pest Control Service - 10/8 11/9/2020 97.92 Paper towels 11/9/2020 96.51 Water Service for Rentals - CA Water 11/9/2020 95.00 QSP License Renewal - Alexander 11/9/2020 94.48 Chain saw sharpening tool 11/9/2020 93.76 2020-2021 Property taxes for APN 510-48-001 11/9/2020 89.99 Hard Drive cloning software 3 licenses 11/9/2020 87.85 Oil change for A101 11/9/2020 87.30 Windshield Wipers 11/9/2020 84.32 RSA/Rhus Ridge - Parking Markers for Parking Lot 11/9/2020 84.05 DHF - Supplies for Fence Repair 11/9/2020 83.63 Trailer Hitch Parts 11/9/2020 83.56 Tire sealant and trailer hitch 11/9/2020 83.45 Clip nuts 11/9/2020 80.24 Sidewinder mower parts 11/9/2020 78.90 Concrete mix for Betsy Crowder Bench 11/9/2020 77.26 Water Service for Rentals - CA Water 11/9/2020 75.27 Chainsaw Bags and Arborist Throw Line 11/9/2020 75.00 LCW Webinar - changes to CA Family Rights Act - Wolfe 11/9/2020 75.00 MB Campsite pay phone 11/9/2020 74.29 Duty Belt - Miller 11/9/2020 72.74 Office Supplies - legal pads, white out, tape, binder clips 11/9/2020 65.68 Misc office supplies for onboarding new employees 11/9/2020 63.65 Monthly Shredding Services - September 2020 11/9/2020 63.33 Fabric/plastic boot covers used for contaminated Covid areas 1dz 11/9/2020 61.27 Supplies 11/9/2020 60.00 State of CA Dept of Pesticide Reg - Qualified Applicator Renewal 11/9/2020 59.01 Portable Filing System 11/9/2020 58.85 Wall mount for UPS battery for FFO shop 11/9/2020 54.85 RSA/Rhus Ridge - Rebar Spikes for Parking Bumpers 11/9/2020 54.60 M236 and M237 Vehicle Supplies 11/9/2020 54.52 Keys for HR office for Mindy 11/9/2020 54.11 Equipment for wildlife camera study 11/9/2020 54.04 Lower WH Parking Lot water 11/9/2020 53.64 Consultant services - programming for counter project 11/9/2020 53.52 Post hole digger 11/9/2020 53.45 M213 - Vehicle Supplies 11/9/2020 53.15 Size C batteries 11/9/2020 53.00 CEQA Notice of Exemption for Newt Mortality Study 9/24/20 11/9/2020 53.00 CEQA Notice of Exemption for New AO Design Review App 9/24/20 11/9/2020 52.32 Kick-off meeting with consultant - Coal Creek Fuel Break work 11/9/2020 52.28 Parts for Folger well 11/9/2020 51.65 MB Black Mountain Campground Utilities - City of Palo Alto 11/9/2020 51.43 Mailing of Tribal Outreach letters for CalFire VTP 11/9/2020 50.00 International Institute Municipal Clerks Webinar - Soria 11/9/2020 50.00 FFO backup internet service 11/9/2020 50.00 Public Notification System - Hubspot 11/9/2020 49.50 CEQA Cultural Resource Training - Hugg 11/9/2020 49.50 CEQA Cultural Resource Training - Casbara 11/9/2020 49.50 Online course CEQA Cultural Resources Evaluation - A.Nuri 11/9/2020 49.50 Cultural Resources Evaluation in CEQA for G. Laustsen 11/9/2020 49.50 Cultural Resources Evaluation in CEQA for - Borgesi 11/9/2020 49.50 Web Forms - October 2020 11/9/2020 49.50 Archaeology and CEQA training - Hebert 11/9/2020 49.49 Website site map creator + cross border fee 11/9/2020 49.00 Cultural Resources Evaluation in CEQA Webinar - Elish 11/9/2020 49.00 Social Media Posting - October 2020 11/9/2020 47.93 Motor-oil and Supplies 11/9/2020 46.92 Sign screws, spray paint 11/9/2020 46.16 Trailer tailgate pins 11/9/2020 43.46 BCR - Lumber/Materials 11/9/2020 42.30 Shipping Fees - Midpen web store items October 2020 11/9/2020 41.09 Angle grindercut off wheel 11/9/2020 40.31 Hand saw, hand broom, sign screw drivers 11/9/2020 39.00 Web PDF Viewer - October 2020 11/9/2020 37.00 Parts for folger well 11/9/2020 36.00 Gas Can 11/9/2020 35.89 Floor Mat for Computer Work Area Use - T.Hugg 11/9/2020 35.50 Caulk gun/adhesive for restroom repairs 11/9/2020 35.34 Drinking water 11/9/2020 34.25 Embroidered Midpen logo mens polo shirt for new Planner 11/9/2020 33.52 Trailer tailgate pins 11/9/2020 33.13 Waterproof case for iPad for Lead OST 11/9/2020 32.91 Shipping envelopes for webstore Q100 11/9/2020 32.67 DEF, fuel 11/9/2020 32.50 Mistaken personal charge - reimbursement sent to finance 11/9/2020 32.19 Programmer services-counter project using Visual Basic Language 11/9/2020 32.00 Mistaken personal charge to be reimbursed 11/9/2020 30.70 AO and FFO fiber 11/9/2020 30.36 ADA sign posts caps 11/9/2020 30.24 FOOSP - Water Conditioning Service - Rayne 11/9/2020 29.29 Web analytics software - October 2020 11/9/2020 29.20 Pizza for San Jose Conservation Corps. Crew 11/9/2020 29.00 Midpen Webstore - October 2020 11/9/2020 28.38 Trailer tailgate pins 11/9/2020 27.85 Emergency 12 volt light for AO1 11/9/2020 27.45 General office supplies for Planning Staff 11/9/2020 27.44 General office supplies for EC Staff 11/9/2020 27.24 SD card for camera 11/9/2020 25.00 Streaming software for virtual events 11/9/2020 24.99 Zapier - list signup management - October 2020 - Bieber 11/9/2020 22.88 Batteries for hand sanitizer 11/9/2020 21.80 Filing cabinet dividers 11/9/2020 20.62 M215 Windshield Wipers 11/9/2020 20.00 CAPIO Webinar - Storytelling: Telling Your Agencys Story - Lau 11/9/2020 20.00 Donuts for Crew on Staff Appreciation Day 11/9/2020 20.00 Training: UCD Managing Weeds in Grasslands etc.. - Winters 11/9/2020 19.65 Size AA batteries 11/9/2020 19.50 Black markers 11/9/2020 17.47 Water nozzle for M204 11/9/2020 17.45 Paper towels 11/9/2020 17.27 Office Door Sign for Brandon Stewart 11/9/2020 17.15 Keys for AO3 for Leslie Wright 11/9/2020 16.34 Office Supplies - colored post-its 11/9/2020 15.99 Forwarding of Midpen.org - 2020 11/9/2020 15.96 Ongoing monthly subscription - LA Times 11/9/2020 13.57 BCR Stables - Supplies for Flexible Drainage Pipe 11/9/2020 12.95 Design software - October 2020 11/9/2020 12.88 Clip nuts 11/9/2020 11.99 Monthly cost for BOD Dropbox account for Board Documents 11/9/2020 11.90 RSA/Rhus Ridge - Concrete Form Tube for Bike Rack 11/9/2020 11.50 AO3 Key Copies 11/9/2020 11.47 Brake fluid for M210 11/9/2020 11.00 Clip nuts 11/9/2020 9.29 Mistaken personal charge to be reimbursed 11/9/2020 8.72 Test purchase web store 11/9/2020 7.00 GIS Request Desk monthly subscription 11/9/2020 6.09 Drinking water for field Crew during heat advisory 11/9/2020 5.44 Gate pipe repairs - SFO 11/9/2020 5.44 Battery for Monte Bello Room remote control 11/9/2020 4.86 Water for equipment lower PC project 11/9/2020 4.49 Water supply for OSP visitors 11/9/2020 1.99 WFB anticipated credit for disputed fraud charge 11/9/2020 1.20 Facebook ad for virtual event promotion 11/9/2020 (8.72) Refund of test purchase web store 11/9/2020 (32.77) Partial refund for damage to cite filing cabinet 11/9/2020 (48.50) Credit - Cultural Resources Evaluation in CEQA Webinar - Leong 11/9/2020 (775.00) RWC Chamber of Commerce Progress Sem Reg Ref - Kersteen-Tucker 11/9/2020 (1,634.85) Reimbursed classes for D. Cowan due to broken arm 11/9/2020 (1,825.00) Refund-cancelled Diverse, Equitable, Inclusive Workplace Classes 11/9/2020 83,353.80 Wells Fargo Bank Credit Card October 2020 Rev. 1/3/18 R-20-20-153 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 3 AGENDA ITEM Increase of an Existing Half Time Position to a Full Time Position in the Legal Department GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution amending the Budget and Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2020-21 to increase the existing half-time position of Risk Management Analyst to a full-time position in the Legal Department SUMMARY The General Manager and General Counsel recommend increasing the Risk Management Analyst position from a half-time position to a full-time position. This position will maintain the risk management administration function in the Legal Department and reflect the growth in workload since the initiation of the 2015 organizational restructuring to maintain a highly efficient and effective risk management program for Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District). If approved, staff would initiate recruitment as soon as possible. The budgeted cost for this position in Fiscal Year 2020-21 (FY21) is $58,528 and the additional cost of increasing the position to full-time is $59,225. While Board approval to permanently increase the position from half-time to full-time is required, no budget adjustment is needed for FY21 because the additional cost will be offset by savings in other areas of the current budget. DISCUSSION The District’s Budget and Action Plan for FY21 reflects the existing Legal Department staffing level, which consists of three and one-half full time employees: General Counsel, Assistant General Counsel, Executive Assistant/Legal Secretary, and a half-time Risk Management Analyst. While District staffing levels have increased approximately 40% since 2013, the staffing for the risk management coordination role has remained the same. There has been a concurrent increase in the complexity and volume of work related to risk management. Growth in the Legal Department and volume of risk management duties was not fully addressed in the District’s 2015 Financial and Operational Sustainability Model (FOSM). With regard to the staffing levels in the Legal Department, the relevant FOSM recommendation stated: Recommendation 53: Maintain existing staffing levels within the General Counsel’s Office; as workload expands with Measure AA implementation and the growth of complex land acquisitions, evaluate opportunities for supplemental contracted and/or in- house legal and risk management support over time. R-20-153 Page 2 In recognition of the expanding need for attention to the risk management program, the incumbent was reclassified from Risk Management Coordinator to Risk Management Analyst in 2019. The incumbent served half time in this role since 2008 and recently retired in October. A variety of changes to the organization have increased the volume of work as well as the required level of skill and diligence necessary to perform the risk management function. For instance, there has been an increase in the number and complexity of contracts and associated insurance coverages, the variety of District facilities requiring risk management coordination (such as new commercial facilities, the corporation yard, and a greater variety of tenants in the property management program). For the past several years, the incumbent also had the diligent and consistent assistance of a very dedicated volunteer, who proved indispensable in helping to catalog and file certificates of insurance and update the insurance database under the supervision of the Risk Management Analyst. Overall, the scope and volume of work under the responsibility of the half time Risk Management Analyst (as currently assisted and augmented by volunteer work) has now reached a level at which the position should be converted to a full-time position. Now is the appropriate time to do so as the agency prepares to fill the recent vacancy. The Risk Management Analyst’s role consists of: providing project management and recordkeeping of first-party and third-party claims administration and reporting; serving as liaison between the District and its risk pool (California Joint Powers Insurance Authority) and associated insurance administrators; evaluating and maintaining evidence of insurance coverage provided to the District and provided by the District to other entities; evaluating appropriate coverages for contracts, leases, and permits; preparing underwriting reports; maintaining property and asset catalogs; and compiling a variety of other reports to support the overall coordination and administration of the risk management program District-wide. Board Policy 3.04, Budget and Expenditure Authority, states the following with respect to the budget: “The General Manager may not approve any expenditure that permanently increases the District’s budget; any permanent budget increase must be approved by the Board… .” The same policy states the following with respect to adding positions: “The General Manager may authorize temporary positions, as needed, as long as expenses remain within the adopted budget. The Board must approve the addition of any new permanent positions.” The General Manager and General Counsel recommend that the Board approve the increase of the Risk Management Analyst position to a full-time position, to ensure the continued quality and appropriate administration of the District-wide risk management program. FISCAL IMPACT The annual cost for salary and benefits for increase from half-time to full-time position in FY21 is $59,225. Assuming that the position is filled during early 2021, it appears that there is sufficient salary savings in the current fiscal year budget to cover early costs. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW There was no prior committee review of this item. R-20-153 Page 3 PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. CEQA COMPLIANCE This item is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. NEXT STEPS Upon Board approval, staff will initiate the hiring process as soon as possible. Attachment 1. Resolution Approving the Changes to the District Budget to reflect an increase from a half-time to full-time Risk Management Analyst in the Legal Department Responsible Department Head: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel Stefan Jaskulak, Chief Financial Officer/Administrative Services Director Prepared by: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel Attachment 1 Resolutions/2020/20-__AmendFY21_RiskMgmtAnalyst 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20-__ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 BUDGET TO INCREASE AN EXISTING HALF TIME MANAGEMENT ANALYST POSITION IN THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT TO A FULL TIME POSITION WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (“Board”) adopted the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Budget and Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2020-21 (“Budget”) via Resolution No. 20-18; and WHEREAS, changes within the District, including an increase in staffing of approximately 40% since 2013, and increasing demands related to the volume of risk management coordination and heightened level of skill and diligence necessary to perform the risk management function, warrant an increase of the existing half-time Management Analyst position in the Legal Department to a full time position; and WHEREAS, the General Manager and General Counsel recommend amending the Budget to increase the existing half-time Management Analyst position in the Legal Department to a full-time position to ensure the continued quality and appropriate administration of the District-wide risk management program; and WHEREAS, Board Policy 3.04, Budget and Expenditure Authority, requires that any permanent increase to the District’s budget must be approved by the Board. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The Budget and Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2020-21 shall be amended to increase the half-time Management Analyst position in the Legal Department to a full-time position. 2. Except as herein modified, the FY 2020-21 Budget and Action Plan, Resolution No. 20-18 as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on _____, 2020, at a regular meeting thereof, by the following vote: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Attachment 1 Resolutions/2020/20-__AmendFY21_RiskMgmtAnalyst 2 ATTEST: APPROVED: Jed Cyr, Secretary Board of Directors Karen Holman, President Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. Jennifer Woodworth, District Clerk Rev. 1/3/18 R-20-142 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 4 AGENDA ITEM Designation of the Oljon Trail in El Corte de Madera Open Space Preserve as part of the regional Bay Area Ridge Trail GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Designate the existing Oljon Trail in El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve as a new segment of the regional Bay Area Ridge Trail in accordance with the intentions of the California State Coastal Conservancy-Bay Area Ridge Trail Partner Grants SUMMARY The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) received grants in 2004 and 2011 from the California State Coastal Conservancy-Bay Area Ridge Trail Grant Program to implement trail projects at El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve (Preserve) (Resolution 04-39, Resolution 11-38). These funds were granted for the purpose of extending the Bay Area Ridge Trail (Ridge Trail) in the Skyline region, a vision the District has shared since 1999. With the Oljon Trail at the Preserve completed and open to the public, the General Manager recommends that the Board of Directors (Board) fulfill the original intent of the grants by designating the 1.7-mile Oljon Trail as part of the regional Ridge Trail. DISCUSSION Located on the eastern side of the Preserve, the Oljon Trail spans 1.7 miles of multiuse trail. It originates at the intersection of the Gordon Mill and Sierra Morena Trails, just south of Skyline Boulevard near Bear Gulch Road. The trail descends for 0.4 miles before crossing the Steam Donkey Trail and ultimately culminates at the Spring Board Trail intersection 1.3 miles further south (Attachment 1). At its northern extent, the Oljon Trail provides a critical link to the broader Ridge Trail network in the Skyline region. Connecting to the Skyline Trail via the Molder Trail, the Oljon Trail provides access to Huddart County Park and Purisima Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve to the north and Wunderlich County Park to the south (Attachment 1). The designation of the Oljon Trail as part of the regional Ridge Trail has been a goal of the District for over twenty years. From its inception, the intent for this trail segment — referred to as the “perimeter trail,” “Bear Gulch Trail,” “future/proposed Bay Area Ridge Trail,” and the “Oljon Trail” throughout District records — has been in part to fill a critical gap in the Ridge Trail (R-99-34, R-04-37, R-05-31, R-08-56, R-13-51). Board approval of the 2014 Open Space Vision Plan Priority Action 4 and Measure AA (MAA) Portfolio 4 support the Ridge Trail vision with El Corte de Madera Creek: Bike Trail and Water Quality Projects. This Vision Plan and R-20-142 Page 2 MAA priority specifically calls out completing sections of the Ridge Trail: “Develop and carry out plans for single-use biking/hiking trails, complete Ridge Trail gaps, and develop trail system leading to parking area. Restore damaged trails for better water quality.” In 2004, the District received a $31,000 grant from the California State Coastal Conservancy- Bay Area Ridge Trail Grant Program in support of the El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve Watershed Protection Program (R-04-37, R-05-31). The grant application states that the grant’s purpose is to build a segment of Ridge Trail at the Preserve and depicts the trail segment on an attached map. Furthermore, the grant resolution includes the following stipulation: “WHEREAS, the project is compatible with the intention of the grant program to encourage government agencies to plan new segments of the Bay Area Ridge Trail” (Attachment 2, Resolution 04-39). In 2009, the District prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the El Corte de Madera Parking/Staging Area and Trail Project. The IS/MND includes the completion of the “perimeter trail” and states the vision for this trail as a future segment of the Ridge Trail. In 2010, the Board adopted the IS/MND alongside an amendment to the Preserve’s Use and Management Plan (R-10-35). Both documents explicitly identify the trail segment described in the Initial Study and previously referred to as the “perimeter trail” as “future Bay Area Ridge Trail” both in text and on a map. In 2011, the District received a $282,000 grant from the California State Coastal Conservancy- Bay Area Ridge Trail to complete the trail construction and habitat restoration projects in the Preserve (Attachment 3, Resolution 11-38, Agreement Number 11-096). The California State Coastal Conservancy-Bay Area Ridge Trail Grant Program sought to encourage government agencies and nonprofit organizations to plan, acquire, and construct new segments of the Ridge Trail (R-11-116). The Board approved the renaming of this trail segment as the Oljon Trail to honor the Ohlone people in 2013 (R-13-51). The Skyline Field Crew finalized construction of the Oljon Trail during the 2019-2020 fiscal year, and the trail was opened to the public in September of 2019. Designating the Oljon Trail as part of the regional Bay Area Ridge Trail will fulfill the original vision for this trail, Vision Plan priority action, and Measure AA, and the intentions of the Board-approved 2004 and 2011 California State Coastal Conservancy-Bay Area Ridge Trail grants. Project Support The Bay Area Ridge Trail Council (Ridge Trail Council) continues to provide support for this designation. FISCAL IMPACT The General Manager’s recommendation has no immediate fiscal impact. Ridge Trail medallions, which have been provided free of charge from the Ridge Trail Council, will be installed by Land and Facilities department staff. R-20-142 Page 3 BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This item was not previously reviewed by a Board committee. It is being brought directly to the Board to fulfill a long-standing grant fund commitment. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. Members of the public on the El Corte de Madera Creek Preserve interested parties list were also notified. CEQA COMPLIANCE While the designation of the Oljon Trail as a segment of the Ridge Trail is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the construction of the Oljon Trail and its designation as part of the Ridge Trail were previously identified and analyzed under the El Corte de Madera Parking/Staging Area and Trail Project IS/MND (2010). NEXT STEPS Following Board approval of this designation, staff will implement the designation of the Oljon Trail as a segment of the Bay Area Ridge Trail, including: • Updating District maps and website; • Installing Ridge Trail medallions on trail signposts; and • Preparing an update for the Quarterly Newsletter. Concurrently, the Ridge Trail Council will work to formally designate the Oljon Trail according to their internal processes. Ridge Trail Council staff will draft a memo stating the trail’s designation and multi-use status, as well as the District’s commitment to its long-term stewardship. The Ridge Trail Council’s Executive Committee approved the Oljon Trail’s designation at their November 12, 2020 meeting. Attachment) 1. Map of the Oljon Trail and Regional Bay Area Ridge Trail 2. Resolution 04-39 3. Resolution 11-38 Responsible Department Head: Jane Mark, AICP, Planning Prepared by: Arianna Nuri, Planner I, Planning Graphics prepared by: Fran Lopez Tapia, GIS Technician, IST StarHill R d Tu nitas Cree k R d B e a r G ulchRd Star H ill R d Oljon Trail E L C O R T E D E M A D E R A C R E E K O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E LA HONDA C R E E K O P E N S P A C E P R E S E R V E N a t i v e S o n s R d. ÄÆ84 ÄÆ35 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (Midpen) 11/23/2020 Bay Area Ridge Trail Designation of the Oljon Trail at El Corte de Madera Creek Open Space Preserve Pa t h : G : \ P r o j e c t s \ E l _ C o r t e _ d e _ M a d e r a \ O l j o n _ T r a i l \ E C D M _ B A R T _ O l j o n T r a i l _ 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 9 . m x d Cr e a t e d B y : f l o p e z 0 10.5 MilesI MROSD Preserves Private Property While the District strives to use the best available digital data, these data do not represent a legal survey and are merely a graphic illustration of geographic features. Area of Detail Half Moon Bay Redwood City San Carlos Menlo Park ÄÆ1 ÄÆ82 ÄÆ84ÄÆ92ÄÆ101ÄÆ280 ÄÆ84 ÄÆ35 Other Protected Lands WUNDERLICH PARK CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY Oljon Trail Dedicated Bay Area Ridge Trail Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. 04 - 39 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM THE BAY AREA RIDGE TRAIL – COASTAL CONSERVANCY PROPOSITION 40 GRANTS PROGRAM FOR PLANNING AND DESIGN OF PUBLIC ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS AT EL CORTE DE MADERA CREEK OPEN SPACE PRESERVE _____________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, the voters of California passed Proposition 40, the 2.6 billion "California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002", providing matching funds to the State of California and its appointees for acquiring lands and developing facilities for public outdoor recreation purposes; and WHEREAS, the State Coastal Conservancy and the Bay Area Ridge Trail Council is responsible for administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary rules and procedures governing application by local agencies under the program; and WHEREAS, said adopted procedures established by the State Coastal Conservancy and the Bay Area Ridge Trail Council require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of applications, the acceptance of the grant if awarded, and execution of the grant contract and related documents; and WHEREAS, the project is compatible with the intention of the grant program to encourage government agencies to plan new segments of the Bay Area Ridge Trail. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District hereby: Approves the filing of an application for Bay Area Ridge Trail Council – Coastal Conservancy assistance; and Certifies that said agency has matching funds from Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s General Fund and can finance 100 percent of the project, half of which will be reimbursed; and Certifies that the project is compatible with the land use plans of those jurisdictions immediately surrounding the project; and Appoints the General Manager as agent of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to conduct all negotiations and execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, billing statements, and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. ** * * * * * * * * * * * * Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 Rev. 1/3/18 R-20-144 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 5 AGENDA ITEM Application for Grant Funding from the Wildlife Conservation Board GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution authorizing the General Manager to submit an application for grant funding from the Wildlife Conservation Board and to negotiate a grant funding agreement for $5,000,000 to support the planning and design of the Highway 17 Wildlife and Regional Trails Crossing Project. SUMMARY The General Manager recommends that the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) adopt a resolution authorizing the General Manager to submit an application to the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB). This report provides a description of the state funds available through the WCB and the approval process for use of the funds. DISCUSSION The Fiscal Year 2020-21 State Budget passed by the state legislature and signed by the Governor on June 29, 2020 reappropriated $10,000,000 in funding to the WCB. The original $10 million appropriation requested by Senator Beall was to support San Jose Water Company (SJWC) land acquisitions. The Senator secured an expanded use of the funds at the time of reappropriation to include a broader array of public benefits that align with the District’s mission. The September 30, 2020 Legislative Report to the Board (Attachment 1) noted, “This reappropriation did two important things: first, it extended the encumbrance or expenditure deadline for the funds to June 30, 2025; and second, it expanded the eligibility of projects to include the acquisition, planning, design, development, public access, rehabilitation, restoration, protection, and expansion of wildlife corridors and open space, including projects to improve connectivity and reduce barriers between habitat areas in the Upper Guadalupe, Los Gatos Creek, Saratoga Creek and adjacent areas from the San Jose Water Company and other land owners.” In late 2020, the District met with the WCB Executive Director to discuss priorities for use of the funding, which will be administered by WCB through a non-competitive grant process. The proposed use of $5 million of the funding will be for planning and design components of the Highway 17 Wildlife and Regional Trails Crossing Project. The District must complete grant- funded work by March 31, 2025 in order to submit for reimbursement prior to June 30, 2025. R-20-144 Page 2 WCB requires a resolution from the District’s Board of Directors prior to reviewing the project and potentially awarding funds at the February 2021 WCB Board meeting. The resolution (Attachment 2) authorizes the General Manager or her designee to sign the application for WCB funds and to execute a grant agreement for the funding. FISCAL IMPACT Upon review and approval by WCB, this funding opportunity would have a positive impact of up to $5,000,000. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This report was not previously reviewed by a committee. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. CEQA COMPLIANCE Submitting grant applications to secure funding is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The WCB requires that grantees comply with CEQA and certify that the CEQA analysis for any project encompasses all aspects of the work to be completed with grant funds. NEXT STEPS If approved by the Board, District staff would complete a WCB grant application for the Highway 17 Crossing Planning and Design Project and the General Manager would submit the application to the WCB for consideration of a funding award at the February 2021 WCB Board meeting. Upon review and approval by WCB, District staff would work with WCB staff to develop a grant agreement for grant funding and the General Manager would execute the agreement. Attachments 1. Legislative Report to the Board – September 30, 2020. 2. Resolution authorizing the General Manager to submit an application for Wildlife Conservation Board grant funding and to negotiate a grant funding agreement for $5,000,000. Responsible Department Head: Stefan Jaskulak, Chief Financial Officer, Administrative Services Prepared by: Deborah Hirst, Grants Program Manager, Administrative Services Contact person: Jordan McDaniel, Senior Grants and Procurement Technician, Administrative Services From: Environmental & Energy Consulting To: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Date: September 30, 2020 Re: EEC 2020 Post-Session Update As the 2020 legislative session draws to a close, below is a summary of the current status of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s (Midpen) legislative and Budget priorities. As a reminder, the California Budget deadline previously passed and all Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget conversations and decisions have concluded. The deadline for the Governor to sign or veto bills was September 30th; therefore, the fate of all bills introduced in the 2020-2021 legislative session have been determined. All chaptered bills will go into effect on January 1st, 2021 unless they included an urgency clause. California Budget: Conservation Priorities Governor Newsom signed the FY 20-21 State Budget on June 29th. The final 2020 Budget Act was a $202.1 billion spending plan to strengthen emergency response, protect public health and safety, and promote economic recovery while closing a $54.3 billion budget shortfall caused by the COVID-19 recession. Key takeaways of the final budget include: o Retention of baseline funding for the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Department of Parks and Recreation; o Retention of funding for the Habitat Conservation Funding; o Inclusion of $4M for the Cutting the Green Tape Initiative at the California Natural Resources Agency; and o Reappropriation and expansion of the original $10M to the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) to support San Jose Water Company (SJWC) land acquisitions. Senator Beall secured a reappropriation and expansion of the $10M to the Wildlife Conservation Board in the FY20-21 Budget. This reappropriation did two important things: first, it extended the encumbrance or expenditure deadline for the funds to June 30, 2025; and second, it expanded the eligibility of projects to include the acquisition, planning, design, development, public access, rehabilitation, restoration, protection, and expansion of wildlife corridors and open space, including projects to improve connectivity and reduce barriers between habitat areas in the Upper Guadalupe, Los Gatos Creek, Saratoga Creek and adjacent areas from the San Jose Water Company and other land owners. Midpen has been working closely with WCB to coordinate the distribution of these funds, and most immediately plans to use a portion of these funds to support the acquisition of the 182 El Sereno acquisition from SJWC along with several components of the Highway 17 project. Cap-and-Trade/Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund ATTACHMENT 1 Governor Newsom’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) final proposal for the FY20- 21 Budget was significantly altered from previous proposals in response to COVID-19 impacts and the anticipated recession. Due to the anticipation of significantly reduced and unstable Cap-and-Trade auction revenues, the Governor introduced a “pay-as-you-go” Cap- and-Trade funding calculation that would establish quarterly appropriations from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. His proposal also prioritized the following three investments, which would need to be made whole prior to appropriating funds to any additional priorities: 1) Forest Health and Fire 2) Air Quality 3) Safe Drinking Water With this proposal, CalFire would receive funding for the Forest Health and Fire Prevention programs. The Governor has expressed interest fuel load management as one of his wildfire priorities to be addressed within this. Ultimately, because Cap-and-Trade auction revenues were reported at very low numbers, it resulted in the assumption that no new funds would be available for new appropriations. The FY20-21 GGRF appropriations, including the three investments cited above, were completely deferred until next year. We can assume the Governor's office will work off the their proposal from May, but they have not said anything publicly. Policy Measures After an unconventional and chaotic legislative year, during which public officials and stakeholders were faced with reacting to the unprecedented impacts of COVID-19 in real- time, the outcomes of Midpen’s high priority bills that moved forward include: •SB 1372 (Monning) Wildlife corridors and connectivity: Wildlife and Biodiversity Protection and Movement Act of 2020 o Midpen Position: Support, Priority 1 o Outcome: Held in Committee •AB 1788 (Bloom) Pesticides: use of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides o Midpen Position: Support, Priority 1 o Outcome: Signed •AB 1190 (Irwin) Unmanned aircraft: state and local regulation: limitations o Midpen Position: Opposed, Priority 1 o Outcome: Dead •AB 3005 (R. Rivas) Leroy Anderson Dam and Reservoir: permitting, environmental review, and public contracting o Midpen Position: Support, Priority 2 o Outcome: Vetoed •SB 940 (Beall) Housing Crisis Act of 2019: City of San Jose. o Midpen Position: Support, Priority 2 o Outcome: Signed ATTACHMENT 1 " SB 795 (Beall) Economic development: housing: workforce development: climate change infrastructure o Midpen Position: Support, Priority 2 o Outcome: Dead " AB 2954 (Rivas) California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: climate goal: natural and working lands o Midpen Position: Support, Priority 2 o Outcome: Dead " SB 1448 (Bradford) Fire prevention: electrical corporations: wildfire mitigation plans: workforce diversity o Midpen Positions: Support, Priority 2 o Outcome: Dead SB 1372, authored by Senator Monning, was introduced by in partnership with the Wildlife Corridor Working Group (WCWG), whose membership includes Midpen. The overall goal of SB 1372 was to facilitate the migration of critical wildlife populations by improving coordination between relevant agencies and ensuring wildlife corridors are integrated into CalTrans projects. Currently, Caltrans recognizes projects within a Regional Conservation Investment Strategies (RCIS), but because RCIS s are not statewide, many projects are left out. SB 1372 looked to solve this by developing an alternative strategy. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the 2020 legislative environment, and the restrictions placed on the legislature to limit their bill packages to urgent or no-cost bills, SB 1372 was held in committee. The WCWG is committed to re-introducing this bill in 2021 and continuing conversations with the related Agencies. AB 1788, authored by Assemblymember Bloom, is a two-year bill that was introduced in 2019. AB 1788 would place restrictions on the use of second generation anti-coagulant rodenticides, which have been shown to be fatal to wildlife. This bill was supported by the AB 1788 Coalition whose membership includes Midpen. After passing out of the legislature, AB 1788 was presented to the Governor on October 4th. Governor Newsom signed the bill on September 29th, and it will go into effect on January 1, 2020. AB 1190, authored by Assemblymember Irwin, was introduced in 2019 and would provide a framework for local agencies to regulate the use of unmanned aircraft systems and provide qualified immunity to local agencies operating drone recreation areas. Midpen took an oppose position to this bill because it would restrict Midpen s rights to regulate the use of potentially destructive drones on Midpen property. After many conversations we were able to successfully block AB 1190 from moving during the 2019-2020 legislative session. Funding Measures Several large-scale conservation funding measures were attempted during this past legislative session as an opportunity to revitalize and stimulate communities suffering from the economic, health and safety, and injustices resulting from COVID-19, wildfires, and climate change. Unfortunately, because legislators were forced to respond to the extreme ATTACHMENT 1 and unprecedented district impacts of these emergencies, coupled with the precarious nature of the legislative process due to COVID-19, all of them ultimately failed to pass during the 2019-2020 session. Several 2020 state bond measures were introduced by legislative members, including SB 45 (Allen), AB 352 (E.Garcia), AB 1298 (Mullin), and AB 3256 (E.Garcia). Although strong and sustained efforts were made by legislative leadership and stakeholders to place a bond on the 2020 ballot as a critical economic stimulus tool, ultimately none of the bond measures made it to the Governor’s desk, largely due to the compressed and volatile legislative timeline. When it became clear that it was unlikely that the legislature would approve a bond for the November ballot the Assembly and Senate introduced a joint $100B Economic Stimulus Plan. This plan would offer economic recovery without raising taxes through mechanisms including Senator Hertzberg’s novel tax-incentive proposal. Unfortunately, the legislature was also unable to fully entertain this proposal due to the impacts of the pandemic. Immediately thereafter, as the legislative session was winding down, wildfires began erupting throughout the state. Attention on an economic stimulus plan shifted to a wildfire funding package and interested stakeholders across the state came together to develop policy language. The package was eventually introduced as AB 1659 (Bloom). The bill was introduced a few days before the last day of session, but its last-minute introduction led to its failure to be heard on the Senate Floor. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolutions/2020/20-XX_FundingWCB_Hwy17 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20-__ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR A WILDLIFE CONSERVATION BOARD GRANT FOR THE HIGHWAY 17 CROSSINGS PLANNING AND DESIGN PROJECT WHEREAS, funds were made available to the Wildlife Conservation Board (“WCB”) for the enhancement or restoration of fish and wildlife habitat and for the development of public access facilities for hunting, fishing or other wildlife-oriented recreational uses; and WHEREAS, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (“District”) intends that the Highway 17 Crossings Planning and Design Project will complete construction designs and permits for a state highway regional trail overcrossing, wildlife corridor undercrossing, and up to 5.4 miles of related directional fencing; and WHEREAS, the project will reduce vehicle-wildlife collisions and increase driver and passenger safety on a key commuter route between Santa Cruz and Silicon Valley; and WHEREAS, construction of the undercrossing will ensure habitat connectivity and safe passage for wildlife, linking over 30,000 acres of habitat including four District open space preserves, three Santa Clara County parks, and private watershed lands of San Jose Water Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District hereby: 1. Approves the filing of an application for funding from the WCB. 2.Certifies the District will comply with all federal, state and local environmental, public health, and other appropriate laws and regulations applicable to the project and will obtain or will ensure that the other project partners obtain all appropriate permits applicable to the project. 3. Further commits to the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreement. 4. Authorizes the General Manager or designee as a representative of the District to conduct negotiations, execute, submit and sign all documents including but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and other documents which may be necessary to administer grant funding for the proposed project. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ATTACHMENT 2 Resolutions/2020/20-XX_FundingWCB_Hwy17 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on _______, 2020, at a regular meeting thereof, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Jed Cyr, Secretary Board of Directors Karen Holman, President Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. Jennifer Woodworth, District Clerk R-20-147 Meeting No. 20-29 December 9, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM Second Reading and Adoption of the Board Compensation Ordinance 20-02 GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION 1. Waive reading and adopt an Ordinance 20-02 increasing Board compensation from $100.00 to $105.00 per meeting pursuant to Public Resources Code section 5536. 2. Amend Board Policy 6.06 to reflect the increase in compensation resulting from the Board compensation ordinance. SUMMARY A recent change to the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s (District) enabling legislation allows the Board of Directors (Board) to increase the per meeting compensation for Board members by an amount not to exceed 5% annually, by ordinance. This item consists of the second reading and adoption of an ordinance increasing the per meeting compensation from $100.00 to $105.00. The ordinance was reviewed by the Board of Directors (“Board”) during first reading on November 18, 2020 (see report R-20-139) with no changes requested by the Board or the public. Attachment 1 contains the final language of the ordinance proposed for adoption. The proposed increases are expected to fall within the Board-approved Fiscal Year 2021 (FY21) budget. DISCUSSION Prior to January 1, 2019, California Public Resources Code section 5536 set the compensation for Board members at $100 per meeting with a maximum of $500 or five meetings per month. This level of Board compensation had not changed since 1984. Based on US inflation calculators, the cumulative rate of inflation during this timeframe has been approximately 150%. Although compensation has not changed in 34 years, the scope of Board member responsibilities and the complexity of policy oversight has substantially grown: •Since 1984, the District’s budget has grown from $13.9 million to $81 million. •The District secured a substantial second funding source for capital projects in the form of a $300 million general obligation bond passed by voters in 2014. •Acres of land preserved by the District have grown from 18,300 acres to over 64,500 acres. •The District now operates in three counties, including the San Mateo County coast, while it previously had operated in only two counties and was limited in San Mateo County to the southern bayside area. R-20-147 Page 2 • The District’s constituent population grew from 570,000 to 770,000. In June 2018, the District supported AB 2329 (Obernolte), the purpose of which was to provide Board members with enhanced latitude in increasing the number of compensable meetings and per meeting compensation amount. Assemblymember Obernolte expressed the intent of the legislation as follows: "This bill puts special districts on the same playing field. Many special districts are operated with small boards of directors that work diligently to make their special district as useful to the community as possible. This important work takes board members' time. Allowing special districts to be allowed the same amount of meetings a month will help level the playing field for those districts that currently have lower limits. Additionally, allowing districts the authority to slightly adjust their compensation annually will help districts assess for themselves what is fair and what their district can handle, rather than raising the compensation statewide." The new law, which took effect January 1, 2019, enables Board members to increase the number of compensable meetings from five to six per month, and to increase the per meeting compensation amount not to exceed 5% annually. Increase in number of compensable meetings per month In November 2017, the Board amended Board Policy 6.06 to expand the definition of compensable meetings to include Board field trips to District project locations, trainings required by State law, and celebratory ribbon cuttings for projects on District lands. The Board also determined that briefings with staff on District projects, and Board member attendance at meetings of outside agencies where the Board member is an appointed representative, would be considered compensable. Due to the increase in projects requiring Board committee consideration, the number of meetings requiring Board member attendance increased approximately 40% from 2017 to 2018. During 2019, Board members typically attended between five and nine compensable meetings per month with numerous months at six or more meetings for individual Board members. Due to the change in the law effective January 1, 2019, the Board adopted amendments to Board Policy 6.06 Meeting Compensation, Reimbursement of Authorized Necessary Expenses for Performance of Official Duties, and Adoption of Ethics Training Requirements Pursuant to Government Code Section 53232 et seq. (AB1234) to allow Board members to be compensated for up to six meetings per month, supported by written findings that more than five meetings per month are necessary for the effective operation of the District. These findings are required to be made annually. The findings were made again in January 2020 to allow Board members to be compensated for up to six meetings per month. Ordinance increasing the per meeting compensation from $100 to $105 In addition to increasing the number of compensable meetings, the amendments to Public Resources Code section 5536 allow the District to adopt an ordinance increasing the per meeting compensation by up to 5% annually. The ordinance must be adopted pursuant to the procedure used by water districts (Water Code section 20200 et seq) that includes multiple opportunities for the public to provide input through a public hearing and a petition process. The procedure for adopting a compensation increase is: R-20-147 Page 3 • Publish a notice of the public hearing in the local newspaper once per week for two consecutive weeks. • Hold a public hearing (first reading), and adopt the ordinance at a subsequent meeting (second reading) • Within 60 days after adoption, the public may petition for reconsideration of the ordinance. In this case, the Board must reconsider the ordinance before enacting it. In January 2019, the Board deferred its decision on the issue of the 5% increase to determine whether other special districts were updating compensation in response to the recent legislation. In July 2019, East Bay Regional Park District (another agency organized under PRC section 5500) adopted an ordinance increasing its per meeting Board compensation amount by 5%. In January 2020, the Board directed the General Manager and General Counsel to prepare this ordinance to increase the per meeting compensation from $100.00 to $105.00 in accordance with state law. The new law specifies that the Board may increase its compensation not more than 5% for each calendar year following the operative date of the last adjustment. General Counsel recommends that the Board enact an increase as a “baseline” in response to the 2019 changes to the law. The Board may consider enacting subsequent compensation increases provided that the increase does not exceed 5% per calendar year. On April 19, 2020, the Legislative, Funding and Public Affairs Committee considered other changes to the Board policy to further define compensable meetings. These proposed amendments to Board Policy 6.06 will be brought to the full Board for consideration in January 2021. FISCAL IMPACT The FY21 budget provides up to $42,000 for Board meeting compensation, and as of September 30, 2020 has $33,000 remaining for the current fiscal year. This amount should be sufficient to compensate Board members for the remainder of the fiscal year and is contingent upon the number of compensable meetings held per month. If it is later determined that additional funds are required, a budget adjustment may be requested. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW The Board of Directors directed the General Manager and General Counsel to prepare this compensation ordinance in January 2020. Additionally, at its April 19, 2020 meeting, the Legislative, Funding, and Public Affairs Committee (LFPAC) discussed the topic of Board compensation, including refining the definition of compensable meetings in Board Policy 6.06. LFPAC approved forwarding a recommendation to the Board of Directors to refine language in the Policy, which the Board will consider in January 2021. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice of the Ordinance was published in the newspaper once a week for two weeks leading up to the November 18, 2020 first reading of the ordinance, in accordance with Public Resources Code section 5536 and Water Code section 20203. If adopted, the ordinance will be published within 30 days of adoption in accordance with Public Resources Code section 5547. R-20-147 Page 4 Public notice was also provided pursuant to the Brown Act. CEQA COMPLIANCE This item is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. NEXT STEPS If adopted, the ordinance will go into effect 60 days after adoption. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Board Policy 6.06 Responsible Department Head: Ana Ruiz, General Manager Prepared by: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel Ordinances/2020/20-02_BoardCompensation 1 ORDINANCE NO. 20-02 ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT INCREASING THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT FOR BOARD MEMBER MEETING ATTENDANCE TO $105 PER MEETING WHEREAS, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (“District”) is a special district duly organized and existing under and pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 5500 et seq.; and WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code section 5536 sets forth the authority for establishing compensation for members of the District’s Board of Directors (Board); and WHEREAS, the current Board member compensation is one hundred dollars ($100) per day for attendance at a meeting of the Board, up to a maximum of six (6) days per calendar month; and WHEREAS, the one hundred dollars ($100) per day amount has not been increased since 1984; and WHEREAS, the size and complexity of the District has increased significantly since 1984, which in turn means that the responsibilities and time commitment for Board service is greater than ever; and WHEREAS, section 5536 was amended in 2018 to allow the Board of Directors, by ordinance pursuant to the procedures set forth in California Water Code section 20200 et seq., to increase the amount of compensation received for attending meetings of the Board; and WHEREAS, California Water Code section 20202 provides that an increase in compensation may not exceed an amount equal to five percent (5%) for each calendar year; and WHEREAS, the Board desires to establish the amount of compensation by way of this Ordinance in accordance with the provisions of state law; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Water Code section 20203 and California Government Code section 6066, a public hearing was held on November 18, 2020, at 7:00 pm, and a notice of said hearing was duly published in the newspaper once a week for two weeks prior to the public hearing. NOW THEREFORE, The Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. A. The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District desires to compensate members of the Board of Directors for attendance at its meetings, in accordance with California law and Board policy. Attachment 1 Ordinances/2020/20-02_BoardCompensation 2 B. The amount of compensation to be received by the Board of Directors for each day’s attendance at a meeting of the Board shall be increased five percent (5%) from one hundred dollars ($100) to one hundred and five dollars ($105) per day. SECTION 2. Upon adoption of this Ordinance, Board Policy 6.06 (Meeting Compensation, Reimbursement of Authorized Necessary Expenses for Performance of Official Duties, and Adoption of Ethics Training Requirements Pursuant to Government Code Section 53232 et seq. (AB 1234)) shall be amended to reflect this increase. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be published once within thirty (30) days after adoption in a newspaper of general circulation printed, published, and circulated in the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. SECTION 4. Pursuant to Water Code section 20204, this Ordinance shall become effective 60 days from the date of its adoption. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Adopted by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Board of Directors on _____, 2020, at a regular meeting thereof, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Jed Cyr, Secretary Board of Directors Karen Holman, President Board of Directors APPROVED AS TO FORM: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. Jennifer Woodworth, District Clerk Attachment 1 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Board Policy Manual Meeting Compensation, Reimbursement of Authorized Necessary Expenses for Performance of Official Duties, and Adoption of Ethics Training Requirements Pursuant to Government Code Section 53232 et seq. (AB 1234) Policy 6.06 Chapter 6 – General Effective Date: 1/30/08 Revised Date: 1/9/19 Prior Versions: 11/13/13, 8/9/17 Board Policy 6.06 Page 1 of 5 A. COMPENSATION OF BOARD MEMBERS 1. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 5536 and 5536.5, members of the Board shall receive one hundred and five dollars ($100105.00) for each attendance at a Board meeting. This amount shall be the maximum compensation allowable to a board member on any given day. A Board meeting includes a closed session of the board, regular and special meetings of the board, field trips to district project locations, district public hearings, meetings of standing and ad hoc committees, trainings required by State law, and ribbon cuttings for projects on district lands. Regarding compensation for committee meetings, only Board members who are members of the committee, or other authorized substitutes appointed by the presiding officer, may be compensated for attendance at the meeting. 2. Board members may be compensated for up to six meetings in a calendar month. 3. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 5536, the Board may adopt an ordinance to increase the amount of compensation received for attendance at a Board meeting. The increase may not exceed an amount equal to five percent for each calendar year following the operative date of the last adjustment of the compensation which is received when the ordinance is adopted. Adoption of such an ordinance must comply with the procedure set forth in California Water Code section 20200 et seq. B. TRAVEL AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES INCURRED WHILE PERFORMING AUTHORIZED DISTRICT BUSINESS 1. Types of Occurrences and Meetings that Qualify for Expense Reimbursement. Board Members are eligible for reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their authorized official duties as provided in Public Resources Code Sections 5536 and 5536.5 and AB 1234 as follows: Attachment 2 Board Policy 6.06 Page 2 of 5 a. Attendance at conferences in accordance with the Board’s “Budget Guidelines for Conference Attendance”, or if the Board, on a case-by-case basis, approves other conference attendance in advance, due to specific business needs of the District. b. Board authorized or General Manager requested, attendance at meetings with nonprofit organizations, joint powers agencies, other government agencies such as grant-funding agencies, District legislators or their staff, local, state or federal representatives, and similar meetings, when such attendance is necessary in order to effectively represent the District’s position on a matter of District concern. 2. Government and Group Rates. Airlines, hotels, rental car companies, and other businesses often make special rates available to government agencies or groups. These rates are presumed to be the most economical and reasonable rates for the purposes of this Policy and shall be obtained whenever available. 3. Transportation. Generally, travel to Board-authorized conferences or other authorized travel between points within 150 miles of the District’s Administrative Office by the Board Member’s private vehicle shall be at the current rate established by the Internal Revenue Service. Travel exceeding 150 miles shall be at rates not exceeding the most economical rates of a public carrier. Specific types of transportation expenses shall be reimbursed as follows: a. Air Travel. Board Members may be reimbursed for the cost of a roundtrip economy-class ticket, provided the amount of reimbursement does not exceed the least expensive airfare that is consistent with the Board Member’s reasonable scheduling constraints. b. Personal Vehicle Travel. Board Members may be reimbursed for expenses incurred in traveling by personal vehicle at the current Internal Revenue Service mileage rate. c. Car Rental Reimbursement. Where necessary when attending a conference or other authorized travel, Board Members may be reimbursed for the expense of a rental car, provided the amount of reimbursement does not exceed the most economical and reasonable rates available. When more than one Board Member attends the event, Board Members shall share the rental car where feasible. Conference and Travel Meals. Board Members may be reimbursed for meal expenses on a per diem basis for meals consumed in conjunction with conference attendance or authorized travel. The per diem rate for breakfast, lunch, and dinner shall be the daily per diem rate established by the Federal Government General Services Administration (GSA) (www.gsa.gov/perdiem) for the region where the conference/training is located. Where the conference/training site or hotel includes meals in the cost of the registration, such meals shall not be included in the per diem allowance unless dietary restrictions require obtaining meals from other sources. A breakdown of allowable rates for breakfast, lunch, and dinner may be found on the GSA web page (www.gsa.gov/mie). Attachment 2 Board Policy 6.06 Page 3 of 5 The above limitations do not apply to meals at conferences or authorized travel at which a fixed price meal is served as part of or during the event. In such a case, the actual cost of the meal will be reimbursed. If a meal is provided by a conference or included in the payment of the registration fee, Board Members may not be reimbursed for meals purchased in lieu of or in addition to the provided meal, unless it is infeasible for the Board Member to attend the meal due to the need to conduct other District business. 1. Conference and Travel Lodging. The District will reimburse lodging expenses when conference or other authorized travel reasonably requires an overnight stay, provided the amount of the reimbursement does not exceed economical and reasonable rates for lodging that meets the Board Member’s reasonable scheduling and official business needs. For lodging in connection with a conference, such lodging costs shall not exceed the maximum group rate available through the conference or event sponsor, provided that the lodging at the group rate is available to the Board Member at the time of booking. If the conference rate is not available, the Board Member shall use comparable lodging and may be reimbursed at a nightly rate not to exceed the maximum group rate available through the conference. 2. Incidental Expense Reimbursement. Board Members may be reimbursed for actual and necessary incidental expenses incurred in connection with authorized conferences or travel. Such expenses may include reasonable and customary gratuities, parking fees, taxi fares, public transportation costs, tolls, telephone calls, internet, postage, facsimile charges, and similar incidental expense. 3. Conference Registration Fee Reimbursement. Board Members may be reimbursed for the expense of an authorized conference registration fee as set out in the Board’s “Budget Guidelines for Board Conference Attendance” or as authorized by the Board on a case by case basis. 4. Other Expenses. All other actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties that are not listed in this Policy shall not be reimbursed unless reimbursement is approved by the Board in advance of incurring the expense. 5. Prohibited Expense Reimbursements. Board Members shall not be reimbursed for expenses such as alcoholic beverages; spouse, domestic partner, or family member expenses; entertainment expenses such as movie, theatre, or sporting event fees; nor for fines for vehicle citations or damage to personal vehicles used in the course of District business. Exceptions can be approved by the Board when necessary to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or other applicable law, such as the payment for a necessary caregiver or companion to accompany a Board Member due to a qualifying disability. Attachment 2 Board Policy 6.06 Page 4 of 5 C. CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT The District shall reimburse Board Members for the use of their personal cellular phone to conduct Board business, receive or make calls with constituents and communicate with District management. The reimbursement shall be $32.50 per month. To be eligible for this reimbursement, the Board Member shall need to submit a completed Cell Phone Reimbursement Form to the District Clerk for processing. Whether or not an employee’s cell phone charges are reimbursed by the District, any records of District business conducted on a personal cell phone or other device (including photos, voicemail, text, and electronic mail) must be made available to the District upon request, including but not limited to when needed to comply with a Public Records Act request. D. DOCUMENTATION FOR COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT 1. Documentation Requirements. The District shall provide Board Members with expense report forms to be filed by the Member for reimbursement of actual and necessary expenses which are authorized to be reimbursed under this Policy. The form shall be used to document the expenses for which reimbursement is sought is proper under this Policy. The District shall also provide a separate form to document compensable meetings. a. Time for Filing Forms. Board Members must file expense report forms by the end of the calendar month following the calendar month when the expense was incurred in order to receive reimbursement. The expense report forms shall be accompanied by itemized receipts for items documenting each expense. Compensation forms shall also be filed by the end of the following calendar month of the meeting for which compensation is sought. In the event a Board Member is unable to file such forms by the end of the following calendar month due to extenuating circumstances, such as his or her absence from home or illness, the Board Member shall file such forms as soon as feasible. In no event shall such forms be filed later than ninety (90) days from the compensable meeting or incurring of the expense. If a Board Members fails to file a timely reimbursement or compensation form, the Board Members shall be ineligible to receive the requested payment. b. Offset of Amounts Due the District. If a Board Member has reimbursable expenses or compensation due from the District, and that Member owes any amounts to the District, such amounts due shall be deducted from the reimbursement or compensation otherwise due to the Board Member. c. Public Records. All documents related to reimbursable expenses are considered public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. 2. Report to Board Regarding Compensable Activities. Board Members shall provide brief reports on meetings attended for which compensation is provided by this Policy at Attachment 2 Board Policy 6.06 Page 5 of 5 the next regular Board meeting attended by the Board Member. The report may be made orally during Board Informational Reports, or in writing. If provided in writing, the Board Member shall state at the meeting that he or she is submitting to the District Clerk a written report of compensable meetings attended. E. ETHICS TRAINING PURSUANT TO AB 1234 Each Board Member shall receive at least two hours of training in general ethics principles and laws relevant to his or her public service every two years. The District shall annually provide information on training alternatives available to Board Members to meet the requirements of AB 1234. The District shall maintain documentation of the dates that Board Members received this training and the entity that provided the training. Attachment 2 R-20-145 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 7 AGENDA ITEM Fiscal Year 2020 Annual Financial Report GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Review and accept the Fiscal Year 2019-20 (FY20) Annual Financial Report 2. Adopt a resolution approving the transfer of a total of $3 million from the General Fund Unassigned Fund balance to the Committed for Future Acquisitions and Capital Projects 3. Approve an updated Board Policy 3.08, Statement of Investment, to reflect a prior Board proviso that was omitted from the prior update. SUMMARY Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2020 (FY20) expenditures totaled $69.2 million, which is 10.3% below the final adjusted budget of $77.2 million. The Board of Directors (Board) adopted the final adjusted budget on May 13, 2020 (R-20-14). Revenue for FY20 totaled $65.8 million, or 0.9% below the final projected revenue. The Unassigned Fund balance is approximately $3.9 million more than the minimum fund balance requirement of 30% of budgeted tax revenue. To ensure adequate funding for future acquisitions and other capital projects, the General Manager and Controller recommend a total of $3 million be transferred to the Committed Fund for Future Acquisitions and Capital Projects. DISCUSSION Revenues The estimated General Fund revenue for FY20 was $55.9 million, and the actual amount received as of June 30, 2020 was the same amount. In addition, Measure AA bond funds provided $8.0 million for capital improvement projects within the 25 portfolios. R-20-145 Page 2 Table 1A – District Revenues by Fund Expenditures The District ended the year with total expenditures of $69.2 million, which is approximately $7.9 million or 10.3% below the final adjusted budget. Excluding capital expenditures and debt service, total expenditures were $31.1 million, which is $4.6 million, or approximately 12.8% below the final adjusted budget. The District’s FY20 total expenditures remained within the approved budget. Expenditures by category are listed in Table 1B and by fund in Table 1C. Table 1B– District Budget & Expenditures by Category Table 1C – District Budget & Expenditures by Fund Fund Balance Before budget adjustments, the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance increased by $3.6 million from $16.5 million to $20.1 million. The District’s Fund Balance policy, as adopted by the Board of Directors on October 26, 2016, states that the District is required to maintain a minimum unassigned fund of 30% of budgeted tax revenues. The budgeted tax revenue for FY21 is $53,487,274, requiring the District to maintain a minimum General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance of $16,046,182. DISTRICT REVENUES (By Fund) FY20 Adopted Budget FY20 Final Adjusted Budget FY20 Year-End Actuals $ Change from FY20 Final Adjusted Budget % Revenues of FY20 Final Adjusted Budget Fund 10 - General Fund Operating 55,969,335$ 55,889,335$ 55,920,439$ 31,104$ 100% Fund 20 - Hawthorn Fund 39,000$ 39,000$ 66,905$ 27,905$ 172% Fund 30 - Measure AA Capital 2,108,421$ 2,108,421$ 2,505,547$ 397,126$ 119% Fund 40 - General Fund Capital -$ 1,960,000$ 1,980,364$ 20,364$ 101% Fund 50 - Debt Service 6,309,350$ 6,385,350$ 5,314,639$ (1,070,711)$ 83% TOTAL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES 64,426,106$ 66,382,106$ 65,787,894$ (594,212)$ 99% DISTRICT EXPENDITURES (All Fund) FY20 Adopted Budget FY20 Final Adjusted Budget FY20 Year-End Actuals $ Change from FY20 Final Adjusted Budget % Spent of FY20 Final Adjusted Budget Salaries and Benefits 25,821,535$ 25,867,535$ 23,615,953$ (2,251,582)$ 91% Services and Supplies 11,746,210$ 10,160,745$ 7,828,976$ (2,331,769)$ 77% Total Operating Expenditures 37,567,745$ 36,028,280$ 31,444,929$ (4,583,351)$ 87% Capital/Fixed Asset Expenditures 19,570,545$ 23,469,452$ 20,101,473$ (3,367,979)$ 86% Debt Service 17,669,563$ 17,669,563$ 17,669,563$ -$ 100% Total Non-Operating Expenditures 37,240,108$ 41,139,015$ 37,771,036$ (3,367,979)$ 92% TOTAL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES 74,807,853$ 77,167,295$ 69,215,965$ (7,951,330)$ 90% DISTRICT EXPENDITURES (By Fund) FY20 Adopted Budget FY20 Final Adjusted Budget FY20 Year-End Actuals $ Change from FY20 Final Adjusted Budget % Spent of FY20 Final Adjusted Budget Fund 10 - General Fund Operating 37,003,848$ 35,529,522$ 31,056,198$ (4,473,324)$ 87% Fund 20 - Hawthorn Fund 140,200$ 92,200$ 12,838$ (79,362)$ 14% Fund 30 - Measure AA Capital 9,447,647$ 10,355,791$ 8,017,412$ (2,338,379)$ 77% Fund 40 - General Fund Capital 10,546,595$ 13,520,219$ 12,459,954$ (1,060,265)$ 92% Fund 50 - Debt Service 17,669,563$ 17,669,563$ 17,669,563$ -$ 100% TOTAL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES 74,807,853$ 77,167,295$ 69,215,965$ (7,951,330)$ 90% R-20-145 Page 3 The General Manager and Controller recommend a transfer of $3 million from the Unassigned Fund Balance to the Committed for Future Acquisitions and Capital Projects. This transfer will set aside additional reserve funds as the District continues to move forward with its intensive program of non-MAA land acquisition and build out of facility and other infrastructure projects. After the proposed transfers, the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance will be $17.1 million, which is $1.0 million above the required $16,046,182 (30% of FY21 projected property tax revenues). A summary of the balances for all District funds (inclusive of the transfer) as of June 30, 2020 is shown in Table 2: Table 2 – District Fund Balances (All Governmental Funds) Operating Expenditures Salaries and benefits ended the year at $23.2 million, or 8.7% below the final adjusted budget. However, this does not include a $1.5 million contribution to the Section 115 Trust established as an investment vehicle to make prepayments towards the District’s unfunded pension liability. For accounting purposes this is transfer of cash and the expenditure is not recorded until the Section 115 funds are forwarded to CalPers. Salary savings were due to several vacancies during the course of the fiscal year, particularly as hiring slowed due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Expenditures for Services and Supplies were $7.8 million or 22.2% below budget primarily due to lower than budgeted spending in contract and outside services in most departments, as well as maintenance expenses. In many instances, the decrease in spending was a direct result of the impacts of COVID-19. Fixed Assets and Capital Projects Capital projects ended the year at $10.3 million, or approximately 24% below the final adjusted budget. Capital project delays were associated with the following factors: • Project stand-downs due to COVID-19 restrictions • Staff vacancies • Additional scope/tasks that extended the project schedule • Difficulties securing quality contractors due to competitive construction market Fund Balance as of 6/30/2020 Transfer Balance - proposed Minimum Required GF Unassigned Fund Balance Balance Above Minimum Required Nonspendable for prepaid expenditures 205,929$ 205,929$ N/A N/A Restricted for debt service 4,813,811$ 4,813,811$ N/A N/A Restricted for Measure AA Projects 32,301,379$ 32,301,379$ N/A N/A Restricted for Hawthorn maintenance 1,464,150$ 1,464,150$ N/A N/A Restricted for General Fund Capital Projects 6,843,580$ 6,843,580$ N/A N/A Restricted for Pension 4,063,202$ 4,063,202$ N/A N/A Committed for Equipment Replacement 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ N/A N/A Committed for Capital Maintenance & Repairs 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$ N/A N/A Committed for Future Acquisitions & Capital Projects 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 6,000,000$ N/A N/A Committed for Promissory Note 900,000$ 900,000$ N/A N/A General Fund Infrastructure Reserve Fund 18,618,465$ 18,618,465$ N/A N/A Assigned for ongoing capital projects 710,000$ 710,000$ N/A N/A General Fund Unassigned Fund 19,978,717$ (3,000,000)$ 16,978,717$ 16,046,182$ 932,535$ 100,899,233$ -$ 100,899,233$ 16,046,182$ 932,535$ R-20-145 Page 4 Land and Associated Costs During the FY20, the District purchased and preserved approximately 542 acres of open space land at a total cost of $9.2 million (net cost of $7.3 million after $2.0 million of grant funding) . Highlights of land additions include: • 540 acre Gordon Ridge Property (non-MAA), Tunitas Creek Preserve • 1.7 acre Gallaway Property, El Corte de Madera Creek Preserve Long-Term Debt and Debt Service Debt service expenses in FY20 totaled $17.7 million, consisting of $9.1 million in principal, $8.6 million in interest. The total also includes $7.3 million for debt service on Measure AA General Obligation bonds. Past Budget Performance Table 3 below presents a comparison of FY20 budget performance to the prior four fiscal years. Overall budgeted expenditures have historically ranged between 86% and 99% of the actual amounts. Beginning in FY17, land acquisitions are funded through budget amendments at the time the Board considers the purchase. The adopted approach reflects the opportunistic nature of land purchases, which are not guaranteed until an offer is accepted, the purchase approved, and escrow closed. This combined with improved focus on project delivery should lead to a more predictable overall budget utilization rate over the longer term. Table 3 – Past Performance Hawthorn Fund The FY20 expenditures from the Hawthorn Fund totaled $12,838, which is 86% below the final adjusted budget of $92,200 (Table 4). Basic repairs and ongoing maintenance were completed in FY20. Table 4 – Hawthorn Fund Budget and Expenditures DISTRICT EXPENDITURES FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Operating Expenses 98%94%90%90%87% Strategic Plan/Vision Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Capital (CAPEX)66%99%79%79%76% Land & Assoc. Costs 71%101%92%92%96% Property Management 74%N/A N/A N/A N/A Debt Service 98%112%102%100%100% Budget Category FY20 Adopted Budget FY20 Final Adjusted Budget FY20 Year- End Actuals $ Change from FY20 Final Adjusted Budget % Spent of FY20 Final Adjusted Budget Operating Expenses 92,200$ 92,200$ 12,838$ (79,362)$ 14% Capital Expenses 48,000$ -$ -$ -$ N/A HAWTHORN TOTAL 140,200$ 92,200$ 12,838$ (79,362)$ 14% R-20-145 Page 5 The Hawthorn Endowment Fund balance as of June 30, 2020 is $1.67 million. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the proposed Fund Balance transfer results in a net-zero change to the General Fund, decreasing the General Fund Unassigned Fund by $3 million and increasing the Committed for Future Acquisitions & Capital Projects by the same by the same total of $3 million. Table 5 – Proposed Fiscal Impact BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW There was no prior Board Committee review for this agenda item. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. No additional notice is required. CEQA COMPLIANCE This item is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. NEXT STEPS With the Board’s acceptance of the audited financial statements, staff will proceed with final submission of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) to the Government Finance Officers Association award program. Attachments: 1. Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2020 2. Resolution approving the transfer of funds into the Committed for Future Acquisitions & Capital Projects 3. Revised Board Policy 3.08, Statement of Investment Responsible Department Head: Stefan Jaskulak, Chief Financial Officer/Director of Administrative Services Prepared by: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager Fund Balance as of 6/30/2020 Transfer Balance - proposed Minimum Required GF Unassigned Fund Balance Balance Above Minimum Required General Fund Unassigned Fund 19,978,717$ (3,000,000)$ 16,978,717$ 16,046,182$ 932,535$ Committed for Future Acquistions & Capital Projects 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 6,000,000$ N/A N/A Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 Headquarters in Los Altos, California Attachment 1 Page Intentionally Left Blank Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Prepared by: Finance and Administrative Services Page Intentionally Left Blank Introductory Section Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE INTRODUCTORY SECTION Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ 1 Transmittal Letter ........................................................................................................................ 3 Board of Directors & Management ............................................................................................. 9 Organizational Chart ................................................................................................................... 10 Regional Map .............................................................................................................................. 11 Achievement Award .................................................................................................................... 12 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor’s Report ..................................................................................................... 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ..................................................................................... 18 Basic Financial Statements: Government-Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position .............................................................................................. 28 Statement of Activities .................................................................................................. 29 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds ........................................................................... 32 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position ....................................................................................... 33 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance – Governmental Funds ................................................................. 34 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance to the Statement of Activities ................................. 35 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements .............................................................................. 38 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAAP) - General Fund ......................................................................... 74 Schedule of Pension Plan Contributions ..................................................................................... 75 Schedule of Net Pension Liability Proportionate Shares ............................................................. 76 Schedule of Contributions for Postemployment Benefits ........................................................... 77 Schedule of Changes in Net OPEB Liability ............................................................................... 78 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual (GAAP) - Measure AA Capital Projects Fund ...................................... 82 Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual (GAAP) - GF Capital Projects Fund ...................................................... 83 Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual (GAAP) - Debt Service Fund................................................................. 84 Measure AA Bond Program – Schedule of Program Expenditures ............................................. 85 Notes to Supplementary Information .......................................................................................... 86 STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position ................................................................................................................................. 90 Changes in Net Position .............................................................................................................. 91 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ...................................................................................... 92 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds .................................................................... 93 Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property ......................................................................... 94 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates ................................................................................ 95 Principal Property Tax Payers ..................................................................................................... 96 Property Tax Levies and Collections .......................................................................................... 97 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding .............................................................................. 98 Ratios of Outstanding Debt ......................................................................................................... 99 Legal Debt Margin Information .................................................................................................. 100 Demographic and Economic Statistics ........................................................................................ 101 Principal Employers .................................................................................................................... 102 Full-time Equivalent District Government Employees by Function ........................................... 103 Capital Asset Statistics by Function ............................................................................................ 104 Operating Indicators by Function ................................................................................................ 105 OTHER INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTS: Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ......................................... 108 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022 December 2, 2020 Members of the Board of Directors and Midpen Constituents: The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) for the year ended June 30, 2020, is hereby submitted. The CAFR has been prepared by the Finance Department in compliance with the principles and standards for financial reporting promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The CAFR consists of District management’s representations concerning the finances of the District and District management assumes full responsibility for completeness, accuracy of data, and fairness of presentation, including all footnotes and disclosures. Management believes the data presented are accurate in all material respects and that they are presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the District. The District’s accounting records for governmental operations are maintained on a modified accrual basis, with the revenues being recorded when both measurable and available, and expenditures being recorded when the services or goods are received, and the liabilities are incurred. District management has established a comprehensive framework of internal controls designed both to protect the District’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse; and to compile sufficiently reliable information for the preparation of the District’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, the District’s designed its controls to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. The CAFR has been audited by the independent certified public accounting firm of Chavan & Associates, LLP. The independent certified public accounting firm has issued an unmodified opinion on the District’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2020. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the financial statements. This letter of transmittal serves as a complement to the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PROFILE The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the “District”) was formed in 1972 to acquire and preserve public open space land in northern and western portions of the County of Santa Clara. In June 1976, the southern and eastern portions of the County of San Mateo were annexed to the District. The District annexed three parcels located in the northern tip of Santa Cruz County in 1992, but the 1% ad valorem property tax is not levied on this land for the benefit of the District. In September 2004, the District completed the Coastside Protection Program, which extended the District boundaries to the Pacific Ocean in the County of San Mateo County, from the southern borders of the City of Pacifica to the San Mateo/Santa Cruz County line. The District encompasses over 550 square miles of land located in the County of Santa Clara (approximately 200 square miles), the County of San Mateo (approximately 350 square miles) and the County of Santa Cruz County (approximately 2.6 square miles). The Counties of Santa Clara and San Mateo are referred to together as the “Counties.”, and approximately 770,000 people live within the boundaries of the District. The District has preserved nearly 65,000 acres of public land and manages 26 open space preserves within its mission to acquire and preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity, protect and restore the natural environment, and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive public enjoyment and education. A seven-member Board of Directors (Board), elected by individual ward, establishes policies for the District. Specifically, the Board sets general operating objectives for the District, authorized debt issuance, monitors financial and long-range planning, establishes policies governing conditions of employment, and sets policies to protect and enhance the natural and cultural resources of the District. Members of the Board of Directors are elected for staggered four-year terms. The Board appoints a General Manager to serve as the District’s chief executive officer. The General Manager provides direction and leadership to all District departments; and ensures that all District policies are implemented. The District is a legally separate and fiscally independent entity from other government agencies which may also provide governmental services within the same geographic area. The CAFR includes all funds of the District. There are no separate or legal entities or component units include in the financial statements of the District. The District has a blended component unit included in the financial statements of the District. In 1996, the District and Santa Clara County established the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority (Authority) to help the District finance improvements by buying land and building facilities in cooperation with the District. The President of the District’s Board of Directors is also the Chairperson of the Authority. Three District directors and a Supervisor from Santa Clara County are also on the Authority Board. In effect, the Authority operates in tandem with the District. FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL CONDITION The information presented in the financial statements is, perhaps best understood when considered from the broader perspective of the environment in which the District operates. State and Regional Economy At the end of 2019, Beacon Economics projected further solid growth in the California economy for 2020 with the northern California region continuing to outpace other parts of the nation with gains in the technology sector. This forecast was tempered by the region’s continuing issue with housing affordability and full employment. However, this forecast changed with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic when Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, followed by an executive order directing all Californians to stay home except for essential employment or shopping for essential needs. The County health officers of both San Mateo and Santa Clara ordered residents to shelter-in-place as of March 16, 2020. The updated UCLA Anderson Forecast released in June 2020 showed the expectation for a severe downturn in economic activity by the fourth quarter of 2020, with U.S. GDP slowing by 8.6% as compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. The national unemployment rate is expected to be 10%, with full recovery not expected until 2023. Given California’s large proportion of tourism and trans-Pacific transportation, the forecast showed the state’s unemployment rate rising to 14.6% by the end of the second quarter as it sheds 2.2 million payroll jobs. In its most recent report for Fall 2019, Beacon Economics report shows that job growth in the South Bay area continues to expand a rate much higher than the state average, with the flagship technology sector recording 3.7% job growth from August 2018 to August 2019 as compared to 1.8% for the state as a whole. The two main challenges to the Bay area economy remain housing affordability and the lack of investment in aging infrastructure that is being further strained by population and job growth. The District’s boundaries encompass a large swath of the Silicon Valley, which continues to be to world’s premier location for the technology industry with a long culture of entrepreneurship and innovation. The District typically derives nearly 90 percent of its total revenues from property taxes, with two-thirds of its general fund property tax revenue from Santa Clara County and one-third from San Mateo County. The real estate market in the both San Mateo and Santa Clara counties continue to demonstrate strong demand in both the residential and commercial sectors. For fiscal year 2020-21, the Santa Clara County Assessor’s Office showed that the assessment roll increased by 6.87 percent, to a total of $551.5 billion. Similarly, San Mateo County reported that the total value of assessed properties increased by 7.02 percent for FY 2020-21 to a record $255.1 billion. Total assessments within the District’s boundaries increased by 9.3 percent for FY 2019-20. Over the past 10 years, the District’s general fund property tax revenues have increased by an annual average of over 9 percent. In a report released for September 2020 by the California Association of Realtors, residential prices showed a year-on-year increase of 20.6 percent in San Mateo County and 14.5 percent in Santa Clara County. While the assessed value continues to grow in both counties, each of the assessor offices remains concerned about the well-publicized affordability issues in the Bay Area. The impact of the recent voter-approved Proposition 19 allowing to keep their existing tax base under certain circumstances, remains to be seen. While the COVID-19 pandemic does not appear to have a negative impact on residential property, commercial development activity and valuations may face headwinds in the coming years as work from home practices become the norm. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, personal income levels as of 2017 (the most recent year for which county data is available) show per capita income of $98,032 for Santa Clara and $113,410 for San Mateo, which are significantly above $60,156 for the State and $51,869 for the nation. In face of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, the District is continuing to develop prudent spending plans, providing it with the financial resources to deal with a potential recession. The aforementioned housing affordability crisis and tight labor market continue to present challenges for hiring and retention of employees. Construction costs for capital projects are still increasing at more rapid pace than general inflation and the construction labor market remains very tight. The District is continuing its to increase its profile with the contractor community with greater outreach. Major Initiatives In the 2019-20 Fiscal year the District’s achieved the completion of major projects and actions including the following: Continued major progress of Phase 2 public access projects at Bear Creek Redwoods Preserve including: •Completion of a new restroom facility, adjustments to the new ADA-accessible loop trail, and feasibility analysis/preliminary design work for further trails. •Completed improvements to Mud Lake by replacing the spillway and outlet, installation of storm water swale improvements and replacement of storm water culverts which will protect Bear Creek Road from flooding and pond habitats. Completed Phase 3 and 4 of the new Oljon Trail connecting Steam Donkey to the Springboard Trail, at El Corte de Madera Preserve. Substantially completed the new 0.6-mile segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail with construction of a new boardwalk and bridge across sensitive bayland wetlands. This closes a critical regional trail gap at Ravenswood Preserve, creating 80 miles of continuous Bay Trail access. Completed the third and final year of a stream gauge and sediment study at El Corte de Madera Creek Preserve to assess the effectiveness or erosion reduction projects with the aim of improving fishery streams. Constructed a bridge and completed revegetation work along the Stevens Creek Nature Trail in Monte Bello Preserve. Continued work to prevent and prepare for wildland fires in response to the increasing fire threat in California. Released a notice of EIR preparation on the developing Wildland Fire Resiliency Program and received approval for the removal of fire-prone eucalyptus trees at Los Trancos Preserve. Made significant progress to bring new Midpen office facilities online for improved administrative functions and delivery of projects and services. This included both the new South Area Field Office and the District’s new Administrative Headquarters. Purchased 542.6 acres of open space lands valued at $12.668 million, including: •The 540-acre Gordon Ridge property as an addition to Tunitas Creek Preserve to support watershed preservation and conservation grazing. •The 1.7-acre Gallaway property as an addition to El Corte de Madera Creek Preserve. •The District also received a gift of 240 acres from the Giusti Family Trust as an addition to •Purisima Creek Redwood Preserve. Relevant Financial Policies Budget Policy The District follow best practices in budgeting, including: assessment of constituent needs, development of long range plans, adherence to budget preparation and adoption procedures, monitoring of performance, and adjustment of budget as required. The District budget is divided into four categories: Operating Budget, Capital Budget, Land and Associated Costs, and Debt Service. The budget is prepared and adopted on a cash-basis, whereas the annual financial statements are prepared on a modified accrual basis. The budget can be amended during the year, in accordance with the Board Budget and Expenditure Policy which states that increases to any of the four budget categories must be approved by the Board. Investment Policy The District’s Investment Policy is adopted annually, in accordance with State law. The policy provides guidance and direction for the prudent investment of District funds to safeguard the principal of invested funds and achieve a return on funds while ensuring the liquidity needs of the District. The ultimate goal is to maximize the efficiency of the District’s cash management system, and to enhance the economic status of the District, while protecting its pooled cash. The investment of funds is governed by the California Government Code Section 53601 et seq., and by California Government Code Section 53630 et seq. Funds on deposit in banks must be federally insured or collateralized in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 53630 et seq. Fund Balance Policy The Board of Directors adopted the Fund Balance Policy in 2014, and updated the Policy in 2016 to achieve the following goals: provide adequate funding to meet the District’s short-term and long-term plans; provide funds for unforeseen expenditures related to emergencies such as natural disasters; strengthen the District’s financial stability against present and future uncertainties such as economic downturns and revenue shortfalls; and maintain an investment-grade bond rating. This policy has been developed with the counsel of the District’s independent auditors, to meet the requirements of GASB 54. The components of the District fund balances are as follows: •Non-Spendable fund balance includes amounts that cannot be spent either because they are not in spendable form, e.g. prepaid insurance, or because of legal or contractual constraints. At all times, the District shall hold fund balance equal to the sum of its non-spendable assets. •Restricted fund balance includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by constitutional provisions, enabling legislation, creditors, or contracts. •Committed fund balance includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by the District Board of Directors. Funds spent from committed funds shall be reimbursed from the general fund within two years. •Assigned fund balance includes amounts that are intended to be used for specific purposes that are neither restricted nor committed. Such amounts may be assigned by the General Manager if authorized by the Board of Directors to make such designations. Projects to be funded by assigned funds require the approval of the General Manager. Funds spent from assigned funds shall be reimbursed from the general fund within two years. •Unassigned fund balance includes amounts within the general fund which have not been classified within the above categories. The Board shall designate the minimum amount of unassigned fund balance which is to be held in reserve in consideration of unanticipated events that could adversely affect the financial condition of the District and potentially jeopardize the continuation of necessary public services. The current minimum unassigned fund balance is 30% of the Budgeted General Fund Tax Revenue. Debt Management Policy The Board of Directors adopted a debt management policy on July 12, 2017. The stated purpose of the Debt Management Policy is to establish the overall parameters for issuing, structuring and administering the debt of the District in compliance with applicable federal and State securities laws. The Debt Management Policy was developed in conjunction with the procedures for Initial and Continuing Disclosure Relating to Bond Issuances, with the latter ensuring that statements or releases of information to the public and investors relating to the finances of the District are complete, true and accurate in all material respects. AWARDS The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement to the District for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019. This was the third year that the District received this prestigious national award. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting. To receive the award, the District must publish a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that is easily readable and efficiently organized, and the contents of the report must conform to program standards and satisfy generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is valid for one year. We believe that our current report continues to conform to the Certificate requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA for another award of the certificate. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report could not have been completed without the efforts and contributions of its staff, as well as other departments across the District. Management also wishes to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Chavan & Associates, the District’s independent auditors who contributed to the preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Lastly, we wish to acknowledge the District’s Board of Directors for their continued interest in support of the District’s effort to improve and strengthen its financial operations and reporting. Respectfully submitted, /s/Stefan Jaskulak /s/ Ana Maria Ruiz Stefan Jaskulak Ana Maria Ruiz Chief Financial Officer/ General Manager Director of Administrative Services Board of Directors & Management EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT Ana María Ruiz–General Manager Hilary Stevenson–General Counsel Mike Foster–Controller Susanna Chan–Assistant General Manager/Project Planning and Delivery Brian Malone–Assistant General Manager/Visitor and Field Services Stefan Jaskulak–Chief Financial Officer/Director of Administrative Services Mission Statement——————————————————————————––––––––––––—————————————————————————————— The mission of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is to acquire and preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity, protect and restore the natural environment, and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive public enjoyment and education. District Wards Left to right: Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Curt Riffle, Yoriko Kishimoto, Jed Cyr, Karen Holman, Larry Hassett, Pete Siemens. ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Pete Siemens Ward 1: Cupertino, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Saratoga——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Yoriko Kishimoto–Board Treasurer Ward 2: Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Palo Alto, Stanford, Sunnyvale ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Jed Cyr–Board Secretary Ward 3: Sunnyvale ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Curt Riffle–Board Vice President Ward 4: Los Altos, Mountain View ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Karen Holman–Board President Ward 5: East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Palo Alto, Stanford——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Larry Hassett Ward 6: Atherton, La Honda, Loma Mar, Menlo Park, Pescadero, Portola Valley, Redwood City, San Gregorio, Woodside——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Ward 7: El Granada, Half Moon Bay, Montara, Moss Beach, Princeton, Redwood City, San Carlos, Woodside——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Organizational Chart Midpen At-A-Glance Public Board of Directors ControllerGeneral Counsel General Manager Public Affairs Department Executive Assistant/ Deputy District Clerk District Clerk/Assistant to the General Manager Visitor and Field Services Assistant General Manager Finance and Administrative Services CFO-Director of Administrative Services Project Planning and Delivery Assistant General Manager Visitor Services Department Land and Facilities Department Natural Resources Department Planning Department Real Property Department Engineering and Construction Department Budget and Analysis Department Information Systems and Technology Department Finance Department Human Resources Department Founded in 1972 Nearly 65,000 Acres Preserved 245 Miles of Trails 26 Preserves 182 Full-Time Employees Over 2 Million Visitors Per Year $81.2 Million Budget 770,000 Residents Regional Map Achievement Award Financial Section INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Los Altos, California Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund for Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the District’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements The District’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the District’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the District, as of June 30, 2020, and the respective changes in financial position and for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, budgetary comparison information for the general fund, schedule of pension plan contributions, schedule of net pension liability proportionate share, schedule of contributions for postemployment benefits, and schedule of changes in net OPEB liability, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Supplementary Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the District’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, budgetary comparison information for the capital projects funds and the debt service fund, the schedule of program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program, and the statistical sections are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, budgetary comparison information for the capital projects funds and the debt service fund, and statistical sections included have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 1, 2020 on our consideration of the District’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the District’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. December 1, 2020 San Jose, California Management’s Discussion and Analysis INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is to present a discussion and analysis of the District’s financial performance during the year ended on June 30, 2020. This report will (1) focus on significant financial issues, (2) provide an overview of the District’s financial activity, (3) identify changes in the District’s financial position, (4) identify any individual fund issues or concerns, and (5) provide descriptions of significant asset and debt activity. This information, presented in conjunction with the annual Basic Financial Statements, is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the District’s operations and financial standing. Required Components of the Annual Financial Report OVERVIEW AND USE OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS This annual report consists of a series of basic financial statements and notes. The statements are organized so the reader can understand the District as an entire operating entity by providing an increasingly detailed look at specific financial activities. The Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities is comprised of the government-wide financial statements and provides information about the activities of the District as a whole, presenting both an aggregate view of the District’s finances as well as a longer-term view of those finances. Fund Financial Statements provide the next level of detail. For governmental funds, these statements reflect how services were financed in the short-term as well as what remains for future spending. The Basic Financial Statements also include notes that explain some of the information in the financial statements and provide more detailed data. The full annual financial report is a product of three separate parts: the basic financial statements, supplementary information, and this section, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis. The three sections together provide a comprehensive financial overview of the District. The basic financials are comprised of two kinds of statements that present financial information from different perspectives, government-wide and fund statements.  Government-wide financial statements, which comprise the first two statements, provide both short-term and long- term information about the District’s overall financial position.  Individual parts of the District, which are reported as fund financial statements, focus on reporting the District’s operations in more detail. These fund financial statements comprise the remaining statements. Management’s Discussion & Analysis Government-Wide Financial Statements Fund Financial Statements Notes to the Financial Statements Basic Financial Statements �� Notes to the financial statements, provide more detailed data and provide explanations to some of the information in the statements. The required supplementary information section provides further explanations and additional support for the financial statements. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENT OF NET POSITION AND THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The view of the District as a whole looks at all financial transactions and asks the question,  How did we do financially during the fiscal year 1899-2020. The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities answers this question. These statements include all assets and liabilities using the accrual basis of accounting similar to the accounting practices used by most private-sector companies. This basis of accounting takes into account all of the current year revenues and expenses regardless of when cash is received or paid. These two statements report the District s net position and changes in net position. This change in net position is important because it tells the reader that, for the District as a whole, whether the financial position of the District has improved or diminished. The causes of this change may be the result of many factors, some financial, and some not. Non-financial factors include the District s property tax base, current property tax laws in California restricting revenue growth, facility conditions and other factors. In the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities, the District reports governmental activities which reflect the District s programs and services. The District does not have any business type activities. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS As the overall economy continued to grow throughout the Silicon Valley, the District witnessed further strong growth in the assessed valuation of both secured and unsecured property within its boundaries. The 2019-20 assessed valuation reports released in August 2019 showed District-wide assessed values increasing by 9.3% (6.3% in Santa Clara and 16.7% in San Mateo). The District received 67% of its tax revenue from Santa Clara County and 33% from San Mateo County. Other financial highlights included: " Tax revenue related to the GO bonds amounted to $5.2 million. " Purchased $23.2 million in land and associated structures funded through cash payments and grants. " The District recorded deferred outflows of resources of $13,272,759 and deferred inflows of resources of $1,786,447 as required by GASB 68 and GASB 75 for pension and other postemployment benefit accounting and reporting. Deferred outflows of resources are technically not assets but increase the Statement of Net Position similar to an asset and deferred inflows of resources are technically not liabilities but decrease the Statement of Net Position similar to liabilities. See Note 1 in the notes to financial statements for a definition. " The District s Section 115 irrevocable trust for pension liabilities held with the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) has a value of $4,063,202 at year end. " Fully funded the District s other postemployment benefits plan according to the actuarially determined contribution for current year, as noted in the schedule of contribution for postemployment benefits. The assets of the District exceeded liabilities at the close of the 2020 fiscal year by $392 million. Of this total net position, $371 million, or 95%, was the District s net investment in capital assets (capital assets net of related debt). REPORTING THE DISTRICT’S MOST SIGNIFICANT FUNDS Fund Financial Statements Fund financial reports provide detailed information about the District’s major funds. The District uses one operating fund, the General Fund, to account for a multitude of financial transactions, two capital project funds to account for capital projects, and one debt service fund to account for debt service payments. Governmental Funds The General Fund is a governmental fund type and is reported using an accounting method called modified accrual accounting, which measures cash and all other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash. The governmental fund statements provide a detailed short-term view of the District’s general government operations and the basic services it provides. Governmental fund information helps determine whether there are more or fewer financial resources that can be spent in the future to finance educational programs. The relationship (or differences) between governmental activities (reported in the Statement of Net position and the Statement of Activities) and governmental funds is reconciled in the financial statements. THE DISTRICT AS A WHOLE Recall that the Statement of Net Position provides the perspective of the District as a whole. Table 1 provides a summary of the District’s net position as compared to last period: Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Assets Current Assets 105,437,703$ 108,643,304$ (3,205,601)$ -2.95% Other Noncurrent Assets 488,551 562,532 (73,981) -13.15% Capital Assets 526,101,317 504,559,409 21,541,908 4.27% Total Assets 632,027,571$ 613,765,245$ 18,262,326$ 2.98% Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 13,272,759$ 14,826,493$ (1,553,734)$ -10.48% Liabilities Current Liabilities 16,110,600$ 16,695,948$ (585,348)$ -3.51% Noncurrent Liabilities 235,321,577 243,049,767 (7,728,190) -3.18% Total Liabilities 251,432,177$ 259,745,715$ (8,313,538)$ -3.20% Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 1,786,447$ 1,471,865$ 314,582$ 21.37% Net Position Net Investment in Capital Assets 371,186,303$ 351,151,768$ 20,034,535$ 5.71% Restricted 6,277,961 8,207,641 (1,929,680) -23.51% Unrestricted 14,617,442 8,014,749 6,602,693 82.38% Total Net Position 392,081,706$ 367,374,158$ 24,707,548$ 6.73% Table 1 - Summary of Statement of Net Position Total net position increased by $24.7 million, as revenues exceeded expenses. Current assets decreased mainly due to the use of cash and investments to pay for capital outlay and retirement of long-term debt. Capital assets increased by $21.5 million mostly from the purchase of land and related infrastructure. Principal payments on outstanding bonds and promissory notes were the main reason for the $7.7 million decrease in noncurrent liabilities. Table 2 shows the changes in net position for 2020 as compared to period 1899. Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Revenues Program revenues 5,948,662$ 3,442,075$ 2,506,587$ 72.82% General revenues: Property taxes 57,250,664 54,395,054 2,855,610 5.25% Investment earnings 2,307,193 3,627,639 (1,320,446) -36.40% Miscellaneous 1,556,894 1,874,272 (317,378) -16.93% Total Revenues 67,063,413 63,339,040 3,724,373 5.88% Program Expenses Land preservation 32,482,326 34,304,215 (1,821,889) -5.31% Interest 9,873,539 10,448,784 (575,245) -5.51% Total Expenses 42,355,865 44,752,999 (2,397,134) -5.36% Change in Net Position 24,707,548 18,586,041 6,121,507 32.94% Beginning Net Position 367,374,158 348,788,117 18,586,041 5.33% Ending Net Position 392,081,706$ 367,374,158$ 24,707,548$ 6.73% Table 2 - Summary of Changes in Net Position There was an increase in change in net position by $24.7 million, as revenues exceeded expenses. THE DISTRICT’S FUND BALANCE Table 3 provides an analysis of the District’s fund balances and the total change in fund balances from the prior year. Measure AA Debt General Capital GF Capital Service Percentage Fund Projects Fund Projects Fund Fund Total 2019 Change Nonspendable for prepaid expenditure 205,929$ -$ -$ -$ 205,929$ 185,984$ 11% Restricted for debt service - - - 4,813,811 4,813,811 6,775,924 -29% Restricted for Measure AA Projects - 32,301,379 - - 32,301,379 37,944,253 -15% Restricted for Hawthorn maintenance 1,464,150 - - - 1,464,150 1,431,717 2% Restricted for capital projects - - 6,843,580 - 6,843,580 8,254,539 -17% Restricted for pension 4,063,202 - - - 4,063,202 2,531,030 61% Committed for infrastructure 18,618,465 - - - 18,618,465 17,688,465 5% Committed for equipment replacement 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 0% Committed for capital maintenance 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 0% Committed for future acquisitions and capital projects 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 3,000,000 100% Committed for promissory note 900,000 - - - 900,000 600,000 50% Assigned for ongoing projects 710,000 - - - 710,000 1,400,000 -49% Unassigned 16,978,717 - - - 16,978,717 16,515,392 3% Total Fund Balance 56,940,463$ 32,301,379$ 6,843,580$ 4,813,811$ 100,899,233$ 104,327,304$ -3% Table 3 - Summary of Fund Balance (All Governmental Funds) 2020 In accordance with the District’s thirty-year strategic plan, the Board of Directors committed an additional $3 million in 2020 for future acquisitions and capital projects. This was an increase to its existing reserves for infrastructure, equipment replacement, and capital maintenance. See Note 1 in the notes to the basic financial statements of the audit report for a description of each commitment. The fund balances restricted for debt service, measure AA projects, and capital projects decreased by 29%, 15%, and 17%, respectively due to District expended more out of these funds during the year ended June 30, 2020. The fund balance restricted for pension increased by 61% as District reserved more for future pension payments. The fund balance committed for promissory notes increased by 50% as District reserved more for future promissory note payments. The fund balance assigned for ongoing projects decreased by 49% since District expended more out of this fund for ongoing projects during the year ended June 30, 2020. GENERAL FUND BUDGETING HIGHLIGHTS The District’s budget is prepared according to California law and in the modified accrual basis of accounting. During the course of 2020, the District revised its General Fund budget, which resulted in an decrease in budgeted expenditures of $1.5 million from the original to final budget. The revenue was revised from $56.0 million to $55.9 million due to decrease in grant revenue. A summary of the original and final budget is presented below: Percent Original Budget Final Budget Change Change Revenues Property taxes 51,863,000$ 51,883,000$ 20,000$ 0.04% Grant revenues 488,300 388,300 (100,000) -20.48% Property management 1,078,000 1,078,000 - 0.00% Investment earnings 2,099,878 2,099,878 - 0.00% Other revenues 479,157 479,157 - 0.00% Total Revenues 56,008,335 55,928,335 (80,000) -0.14% Expenditures Salaries and employee benefits 25,349,838 25,460,977 111,139 0.44% Services and supplies 11,746,210 10,160,745 (1,585,465) -15.60% Capital outlay 48,000 - (48,000) -100.00% Total Expenses 37,144,048 35,621,722 (1,522,326) -4.27% Net Change in Fund Balance 18,864,287$ 20,306,613$ 1,442,326$ 7.65% Table 4 - Summary of Original to Final Budgets CAPITAL ASSETS Table 5 shows 2020 capital asset balances as compared to 1899. Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Land 450,098,759$ 437,763,645$ 12,335,114$ 2.82% Construction-in-Progress 17,313,507 16,193,374 1,120,133 6.92% Structure and Improvements 19,118,187 18,059,730 1,058,457 5.86% Infrastructure 37,093,321 29,542,214 7,551,107 25.56% Equipment 1,092,107 1,113,614 (21,507) -1.93% Vehicles 1,385,436 1,886,832 (501,396) -26.57% Total Capital Assets - Net 526,101,317$ 504,559,409$ 21,541,908$ 4.27% Table 5 - Summary of Capital Assets Net of Depreciation Additional detail and information on capital asset activity is described in the notes to the financial statements, note 5. LONG TERM LIABILITIES Table 6 summarizes the changes in long-term liabilities from 2020 to 1899. Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Promissory Notes 37,938,606$ 38,899,934$ (961,328)$ -2.47% Bonds 190,555,234 199,505,576 (8,950,342) -4.49% Net Pension Liability 11,828,627 10,412,478 1,416,149 13.60% Net OPEB Liability 1,500,844 1,862,277 (361,433) -19.41% Compensated Absences 2,777,151 2,368,387 408,764 17.26% Total Long-term Liabilities 244,600,462$ 253,048,652$ (8,448,190)$ -3.34% Table 6 - Summary of Long-term Liabilities Additional detail and information on long-term liabilities activity is described in the notes to the financial statements, note 6. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET The Board of Directors adopted the District’s budget for fiscal year 2020-21 on June 24, 2020. This budget assumes $65.2 million in revenues and a growth in general fund property tax income of 3.8% over the prior year’s adopted budget. This budget funds $27.7 million of capital spending, of which $10.2 million is expected to qualify for reimbursement from Measure AA GO bond funds. General Fund operating expenditures are budgeted at $35.0 million, a 7.0% decrease over the prior year’s adopted budget. Debt service is budgeted at $16.6 million, with $6.0 million related to the Measure AA general obligation bonds. If all revenues, expenditures (including debt service) occur as budgeted, the District’s overall cash balances would increase by approximately $0.8 million. CONTACTING THE DISTRICT’S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, parents, participants, investors and creditors with a general overview of the District’s finances and to demonstrate the District’s accountability for the money it receives. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Administrative Office, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, California 94022. Page Intentionally Left Blank Basic Financial Statements Page Intentionally Left Blank GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENTS Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities summarize the entire District’s financial activities and financial position.They are prepared on the same basis as is used by most businesses,which means they include all the District’s assets and all its liabilities,as well as all its revenues and expenses.This is known as the full accrual basis.The effect of all of the District’s transactions is taken into account,regardless of whether or when cash changes hands, but all material internal transactions between District funds have been eliminated. The Statement of Net Position reports the difference between the District’s total assets and the District’s total liabilities,including all the District’s capital assets and all its long-term debt.The Statement of Net Position presents information in a way that focuses the reader on the composition of the District’s net position,by subtracting total liabilities from total assets. The Statement of Net Position summarizes the financial position of all of the District’s Governmental Activities in a single column.The District’s Governmental Activities include the activities of its General Fund,along with all its Special Revenue Funds, Capital Projects Funds, and Debt Service Funds. The Statement of Activities reports increases and decreases in the District’s net position.It is also prepared on the full accrual basis,which means it includes all the District’s revenues and all its expenses,regardless of when cash changes hands.This differs from the “modified accrual”basis used in the Fund financial statements,which reflect only current assets, current liabilities, available revenues and measurable expenditures. The Statement of Activities presents the District’s expenses first,listed by program.Program revenues –that is, revenues which are generated directly by these programs -are then deducted from program expenses to arrive at the net expense of each governmental program.The District’s general revenues are then listed in the Governmental Activities and the Change in Net Position is computed and reconciled with the Statement of Net Position. Both these Statements include the financial activities of the District and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority.This entity is legally separate but is a component unit of the District because it is controlled by the District, which is financially accountable for the Authority’s activities. Assets Current assets: Cash and investments 104,639,305$ Accounts receivable: Interest 214,097 Other 362,854 Taxes receivable 221 Other current assets 221,226 Total current assets 105,437,703 Noncurrent assets: Notes receivable 74,509 Unamortized issuance costs 414,042 Non-depreciable capital assets 467,412,266 Capital assets, net of depreciation 58,689,051 Total noncurrent assets 526,589,868 Total Assets 632,027,571$ Deferred Outflows of Resources OPEB adjustments 638,539$ Pension adjustments 4,083,643 Deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt 8,550,577 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 13,272,759$ Liabilities Current liabilities: Accounts payable 2,616,408$ Deposits payable 177,135 Payroll and other liabilities 1,744,926 Accrued interest 2,293,246 Current portion of long-term liabilities 9,278,885 Total current liabilities 16,110,600 Noncurrent liabilities: Long-term liabilities - net of current portion 235,321,577 Total Liabilities 251,432,177$ Deferred Inflows of Resources OPEB adjustments 215,779$ Pension adjustments 1,570,668 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 1,786,447$ Net Position Net investment in capital assets 371,186,303$ Restricted for: Debt service 4,813,811 Hawthorne maintenance 1,464,150 Total restricted 6,277,961 Unrestricted 14,617,442 Total Net Position 392,081,706$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Net Position June 30, 2020 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Net (Expense) Capital Revenue and Charges for Grants and Changes in Expenses Services Contributions Net Position Governmental activities: Land preservation 32,482,326$ 2,655,179$ 3,293,483$ (26,533,664)$ Interest and fiscal charges 9,873,539 - - (9,873,539) Total governmental activities 42,355,865$ 2,655,179$ 3,293,483$ (36,407,203) General revenues and special item: Property taxes 57,250,664 Investment earnings 2,307,193 Other revenues 1,565,738 Special item - loss on disposal of capital assets (8,844) Total general revenues and special item 61,114,751 Change in net position 24,707,548 Net position beginning 367,374,158 Net position ending 392,081,706$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Activities For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Program Revenues The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Page Intentionally Left Blank Fund Title Fund Description General Fund The fund is the general operating fund of the District. It is used to account for all financial resources. The major revenue sources for this fund are property taxes, grant revenues and interest income. Expenditures are made for land preservation and other operating expenditures. Measure AA Capital Projects Fund This fund is used to account for resources from bond proceeds and expenditures for capital projects related to the Measure AA GO Bond. GF Capital Projects Fund This fund is used to account for expenditures for capital projects not related to any other capital projects funds. Debt Service Fund This fund is used to account for accumulation of resources for, and the payment of long-term debt principal, interest and related costs. Resources are provided by General Fund transfers and interest income on unspent funds. FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The funds described below were determined to be Major Funds by the District in fiscal year 2020. Measure AA GF Capital Debt Total General Capital Projects Service Governmental Fund Projects Fund Fund Fund Funds Assets Cash and investments 59,060,612$ 33,044,310$ 7,720,572$ 4,813,811$ 104,639,305$ Receivables: Interest 214,097 - - - 214,097 Other 362,854 - - - 362,854 Taxes receivable 221 - - - 221 Other current assets 221,226 - - - 221,226 Due from other funds 9,308,458 9,702,604 - - 19,011,062 Notes receivable 74,509 - - - 74,509 Total Assets 69,241,977$ 42,746,914$ 7,720,572$ 4,813,811$ 124,523,274$ Liabilities Liabilities: Accounts payable 913,498$ 1,137,077$ 565,833$ -$ 2,616,408$ Deposits payable 177,135 - - - 177,135 Due to other funds 9,391,445 9,308,458 311,159 - 19,011,062 Payroll and other liabilities 1,744,926 - - - 1,744,926 Total Liabilities 12,227,004 10,445,535 876,992 - 23,549,531 Deferred Inflows of Resources Unavailable revenues 74,510 - - - 74,510 Fund Balance Nonspendable: Prepaid expenditures 205,929 - - - 205,929 Restricted for: Debt service - - - 4,813,811 4,813,811 Measure AA capital projects - 32,301,379 - - 32,301,379 Hawthorn maintenance 1,464,150 - - - 1,464,150 Capital projects - - 6,843,580 - 6,843,580 Pension 4,063,202 - - - 4,063,202 Committed for: Infrastructure 18,618,465 - - - 18,618,465 Equipment replacement 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 Capital maintenance 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 Future acquisitions and capital projects 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 Promissory note 900,000 - - - 900,000 Assigned for: Ongoing Projects 710,000 - - - 710,000 Unassigned 16,978,717 - - - 16,978,717 Total Fund Balance 56,940,463 32,301,379 6,843,580 4,813,811 100,899,233 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance 69,241,977$ 42,746,914$ 7,720,572$ 4,813,811$ 124,523,274$ Balance Sheet Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District June 30, 2020 Governmental Funds The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Total fund balance - governmental funds 100,899,233$ Amounts reported in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported as assets in governmental funds. Capital assets at cost 549,421,628$ Accumulated depreciation (23,320,311) 526,101,317 Principal on notes receivables are recorded as unearned revenue in the funds, which upon collection is a current financial resource. In the government-wide financial statements, repayment of the principal amount does not generate revenue in the statement of activities; therefore, unearned revenue is not recorded.74,510 The difference between OPEB plan assumptions and estimates versus actuals are not included in the plan's actuarial study until the next fiscal year and are reported as deferred outflows or inflows of resources in the statement of net position.422,760 The difference between pension plan assumptions and estimates versus actuals are not included in the plan's actuarial study until the next fiscal year and are reported as deferred outflows or inflows of resources in the statement of net position.2,512,975 Interest payable on long-term debt does not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, is not reported in the governmental funds.(2,293,246) Discounts and premiums related to bond issues are recorded as other financing sources and uses in the fund financial statements but are recorded as assets or liabilities and amortized over the life of the bond in the statement of net position: Premium 24,263,367$ Issuance cost (414,042) (23,849,325) Deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt is recorded in the Statement of Net Position as a deferred outflow of resources and amortized on a straight line basis over the original life of the defeased bond.8,550,577 Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current year and therefore are not reported as liabilities in the funds. Long-term liabilities at year-end consists of: Bonds 171,260,000$ Net pension liability 11,828,627 Promissory notes 32,970,473 Compensated absences 2,777,151 Net OPEB liability 1,500,844 (220,337,095) Total net position - governmental activities 392,081,706$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position June 30, 2020 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Measure AA GF Capital Debt Total General Capital Projects Service Governmental Fund Projects Fund Fund Fund Funds Revenues: Property taxes 52,024,342$ -$ -$ 5,226,322$ 57,250,664$ Grant income 31,396 1,498,087 1,764,000 - 3,293,483 Property management 2,655,179 - - - 2,655,179 Investment earnings 1,014,726 1,007,460 216,363 88,317 2,326,866 Other revenues 261,702 - - - 261,702 Total revenues 55,987,345 2,505,547 1,980,363 5,314,639 65,787,894 Expenditures: Current: Land preservation: Salaries and employee benefits 23,240,060 375,893 - - 23,615,953 Services and supplies 7,828,976 - - - 7,828,976 Capital outlay - 7,641,519 12,459,954 - 20,101,473 Debt service: Principal - - - 9,115,000 9,115,000 Interest - - - 8,554,563 8,554,563 Total expenditures 31,069,036 8,017,412 12,459,954 17,669,563 69,215,965 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 24,918,309 (5,511,865) (10,479,591) (12,354,924) (3,428,071) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 889,920 - 9,827,543 10,392,811 21,110,274 Transfers out (20,220,354) - (889,920) - (21,110,274) Total other financing sources (uses) (19,330,434) - 8,937,623 10,392,811 - Net changes in fund balance 5,587,875 (5,511,865) (1,541,968) (1,962,113) (3,428,071) Fund balance beginning 51,352,588 37,944,253 8,254,539 6,775,924 104,327,304 Prior period adjustment - (131,009) 131,009 - - Fund balance beginning - as adjusted 51,352,588 37,813,244 8,385,548 6,775,924 104,327,304 Fund balance ending 56,940,463$ 32,301,379$ 6,843,580$ 4,813,811$ 100,899,233$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Governmental Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Total net change in fund balance - governmental funds (3,428,071)$ Capital outlays are reported in governmental funds as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. Expenditures capitalized as capital assets 24,674,628$ Depreciation expense (3,123,880) Loss on disposal of capital asset (8,844) 21,541,904 Repayment of notes receivable is reported as revenue in the governmental funds because financial resources were received and available during the fiscal year. In the statement of net position, the payment reduces the principal balance of notes receivable and does not generate revenue in the statement of activities.(19,673) Accreted interest on capital appreciation bonds is not recorded in the governmental funds but is required to be recorded under the accrual basis of accounting in the government wide financial statements.(507,362) The governmental funds report debt proceeds as an other financing source, while repayment of debt principal is reported as an expenditure. Interest is recognized as an expenditure in the governmental funds when it is due. The net effect of these differences in the treatment of long-term debt and related items is as follows: Repayment of bond principal 7,830,000 Repayment of promissory notes principal 1,285,000 9,115,000 Deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt is amortized over the life of the debt in the statement of activities. Amortization expense is not reported in the governmental funds.(845,123) Prepaid issuance costs, discounts and premiums related to bond issues are recorded as other financing sources and uses in the fund financial statements but are recorded as assets or liabilities and amortized over the life of the bond in the statement of net position: Amortization of issuance costs and premiums - net 1,249,724 In the Statement of Activities, compensated absences are measured by the amount earned during the year. In governmental funds, however, expenditures for those items are measured by the amount of financial resources used (essentially the amounts paid). This year, vacation earned exceeded the amounts used.(408,764) In governmental funds, actual contributions to pension and OPEB plans are reported as expenditures in the year incurred. However, in the government-wide statement of activities, only the current year pension and OPEB expense as noted in the plans' valuation reports is reported as an expense, as adjusted for deferred inflows and outflows of resources.(2,077,906) Interest on long-term debt in the Statement of Activities differs from the amount reported in the governmental funds because interest is recognized as an expenditure in the funds when it is due and thus requires the use of current financial resources. In the Statement of Activities, however, interest expense is recognized as the interest accrues, regardless of when it is due.87,819 Change in net position of governmental activities 24,707,548$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Page Intentionally Left Blank Notes to Financial Statements NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. General The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District) was formed in 1972 to acquire and preserve public open space land in northern and western portions of Santa Clara County. In June 1976, the southern and eastern portions of San Mateo County were annexed to the District. The District annexed a small portion of the northern tip of Santa Cruz County in 1992. In September 2004, the District completed the Coastside Protection Program, which extended the District boundaries to the Pacific Ocean in San Mateo County, from the southern borders of Pacifica to the San Mateo/Santa Cruz County line. B. Accounting Principles The accounting policies of the District conform to generally accepted accounting principles as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). C. Reporting Entity As required by generally accepted accounting principles, these basic financial statements present the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and its component unit. The component unit discussed in the following paragraph is included in the District's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the District. Blended Component Unit. The District and the County of Santa Clara entered into a joint exercise of powers agreement dated May 1, 1996, creating the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority (the Authority), pursuant to the California Government Code. The District is financially accountable for the Authority, as it appoints a voting majority of the governing board; is able to impose its will in the Authority; and the Authority provides specific financial benefits to, and imposes specific financial burdens on, the District. The Authority was formed for the sole purpose of providing financing assistance to the District to fund the acquisition of land to preserve and use as open space. As such, the Authority is an integral part of the District, and accordingly, all of the Authority's activity is blended within the accompanying debt service fund. D. Basis of Presentation Government-wide Financial Statements: The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities) report information on all of the activities of the District. The Statement of Net Position reports all assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and net position. The government-wide statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. This approach differs from the manner in which governmental fund financial statements are prepared. Governmental fund financial statements, therefore, include the reconciliation with brief explanations to better identify the relationship between the government wide statements and the statements for the governmental funds. The government-wide statement of activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each function or program of the District’s governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a service, program, or department and are therefore clearly identifiable to a particular function. The District does not allocate indirect expenses to functions in the statement of activities. Program revenues include charges paid by the recipients of goods or services offered by a program, as well as grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular program. Revenues that are not classified as program revenues are presented as general revenues of the District, with certain exceptions. The comparison of direct expenses with program revenues identifies the extent to which each governmental function is self-financing or draws from the general revenues of the District. Fund Financial Statements: Fund financial statements report detailed information about the District. The accounting and financial treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. All governmental funds are accounted for using a flow of current financial resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, only current assets, deferred outflows, current liabilities and deferred inflows are generally included on the balance sheet. The Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance for these funds present increases (i.e., revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (i.e., expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. E. Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Government-wide financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Governmental funds use the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues - Exchange and Non-exchange Transactions: Revenue resulting from exchange transactions, in which each party gives and receives essentially equal value, is recorded under the accrual basis when the exchange takes place. On a modified accrual basis, revenue is recorded in the fiscal period in which the resources are measurable and become available. “Available” means the resources will be collected within the current fiscal period or are expected to be collected soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current fiscal period. For the District, “available” means collectible within the current period or within 90 days after period-end. Non-exchange transactions, in which the District receives value without directly giving equal value in return, include property taxes, grants, and entitlements. Under the accrual basis, revenue from property taxes is recognized in the fiscal period for which the taxes are levied. Revenue from grants and entitlements is recognized in the fiscal period in which all eligibility requirements have been satisfied. Eligibility requirements include timing requirements, which specify the period when the resources are to be used or the fiscal period when use is first permitted; matching requirements, in which the District must provide local resources to be used for a specific purpose; and expenditure requirements, in which the resources are provided to the District on a reimbursement basis. Under the modified accrual basis, revenue from non-exchange transactions must also be available before it can be recognized. Deferred Outflows/Deferred Inflows: A deferred outflow of resources is defined as a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expenses/expenditure) until then. A deferred inflow of resources is defined as an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenues) until that time. When applicable, unamortized portions of the gain and loss on refunding debt are reported as deferred inflows and deferred outflows of resources, respectively. Deferred outflows and inflows of resources are reported for the changes related to benefit plans. In addition, when an asset is recorded in governmental fund financial statements but the revenue is not available, a deferred inflow of resources is reported until such time as the revenue becomes available. Unearned Revenue: Unearned revenue arises when assets (such as cash) are received before revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Grants and entitlements received before eligibility requirements (such as qualified expenditures) are met are recorded as liabilities from unearned revenue. Unavailable Revenue: In the governmental fund financial statements, receivables associated with non-exchange transactions that will not be collected within the availability period have been recorded as deferred inflows of resources as unavailable revenue. Expenses/Expenditures: On the accrual basis of accounting, expenses are recognized at the time a liability is incurred. On the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures are generally recognized in the accounting period in which the related fund liability is incurred, as under the accrual basis of accounting. However, under the modified accrual basis of accounting, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. Allocations of cost, such as depreciation and amortization, are not recognized in the governmental funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the District’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. F. Fund Accounting The accounts of the District are organized into four funds with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise of the District’s assets, deferred outflows, liabilities, deferred inflows, fund balance, revenues, and expenditures. The District resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purpose for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Major funds are defined as funds that have either assets, liabilities, revenues or expenditures/expenses equal to ten percent of their fund-type total and five percent of the grand total. The General Fund is always a major fund. The District may also select other funds it believes should be presented as major funds. The District reported all of its funds as major governmental funds in the accompanying financial statements: General Fund. The General Fund is the general operating fund of the District. It is used to account for all financial resources. The major revenue sources for this fund are property taxes, grant revenues and interest income. Expenditures are made for land preservation and other operating expenditures. Measure AA Capital Projects Fund. The Measure AA Capital Projects Fund is used to account for resources from bond proceeds and expenditures for capital projects related to the Measure AA GO Bond. GF Capital Projects Fund. GF Capital Projects Fund is used to account for expenditures for capital projects not related to any other capital projects funds. Debt Service Fund. The Debt Service Fund is used to account for accumulation of resources for, and the payment of long-term debt principal, interest and related costs. Resources are provided by tax revenue, General Fund transfers, and interest income on unspent funds. G. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The District's Board of Directors adopts an annual operating budget for the District by major fund, on or before June 30, for the ensuing fiscal period. The Board of Directors may amend the budget by resolution during the fiscal period. The legal level of control, the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed the budget, is at the category level. H. Assets, Liabilities, and Equity 1. Cash and Cash Equivalents The District’s cash deposits are considered to be cash on hand and cash in banks. Cash and Cash Equivalents are generally considered short-term, highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the purchase date. 2. Investments Investments are recorded at fair value in accordance with GASB Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. Accordingly, the change in fair value of investments is recognized as an increase or decrease to investment assets and investment income. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. In determining this amount, three valuation techniques are available: • Market approach - This approach uses prices generated for identical or similar assets or liabilities. The most common example is an investment in a public security traded in an active exchange such as the NYSE. • Cost approach - This technique determines the amount required to replace the current asset. This approach may be ideal for valuing donations of capital assets or historical treasures. " Income approach - This approach converts future amounts (such as cash flows) into a current discounted amount. Each of these valuation techniques requires inputs to calculate a fair value. Observable inputs have been maximized in fair value measures, and unobservable inputs have been minimized. 3. Prepaid Expenditures The District has the option of reporting expenditures in governmental funds for prepaid items either when purchased or during the benefiting period. The District has chosen to report the expenditure during the benefiting period. 4. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include land, buildings and improvements, furniture, equipment, and construction in progress, are reported in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are valued at cost when historical records are available and at an estimated historical cost when no historical records exist. Donated capital assets are valued at their acquisition value at the time of acquisition plus ancillary charges, if any. Donated works of art and similar items and capital assets received in service concession arrangements are reported at acquisition value. The District utilizes a capitalization threshold of $1 for land, $25,000 for equipment, fixtures and vehicles, $50,000 for infrastructure, improvements, buildings and structures. Projects under construction are recorded at cost as construction in progress and transferred to the appropriate asset account when substantially complete. Costs of major improvements and rehabilitation of buildings are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense when incurred. Equipment disposed of, or no longer required for its existing use, is removed from the records at actual or estimated historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation. All capital assets, except land and construction in progress, are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Years Structures/Improvements 50 Public Access Infrastructure 20 - 50 Equipment/Fixtures 5 - 20 Vehicles 5 Software 5 - 10 5. Compensated Absences In accordance with the District's memorandum of understanding with various employee groups, employees accrue fifteen days of vacation during the first nine years of service, twenty days between service years 10 and fourteen, twenty-one days between service years fifteen and nineteen, twenty-three days between service years twenty and twenty-four, and twenty-five days after twenty-five years of service. An employee may accumulate vacation time earned to a maximum of two times the amount of his/her annual vacation accrual. Full-time employees accrue twelve days of sick leave: annually from the date of employment. An employee may accumulate sick leave time earned on an unlimited basis. Upon resignation, separation from service, or retirement from District employment, workers in good standing with ten or more years of District employment shall receive a cash payment of the equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave as follows: Percentage of equivalent cash value of accrued Years of Employment sick leave 15-20 20% 16-20 25% 21 or more 30% An employee hired before June 30, 2006, who retires from the District shall receive a cash payment of the percentage of equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave based on years of employment as described above, and apply the remainder of the equivalent cash value toward his/her cost of retiree medical plan premiums and/or other qualified medical expenses. Upon retirement, the amount qualified and designated for retiree medical costs shall be deposited in the Retiree Health Savings (RHS) plan, set up by the District. The cost for maintaining the retiree's RHS account and the annual fee for the reimbursement process of qualified medical expenses will be paid for by the retiree. An employee hired on or after July 1, 2006, who retires from the District may elect to receive only a cash payment of the percentage of equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave based on years of employment as described above. In all cases the equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave will be based on current rate of pay as of the date of separation from District employment. The District accrues for all salary-related items in the government-wide statements for which they are liable to make a payment directly and incrementally associated with payments made for compensated absences on termination. Compensated absences are liquidated by the fund that has recorded the related liability. The long-term portion of governmental activities compensated absences is liquidated primarily by the General Fund. 6. Long-Term/Noncurrent Obligations In the government-wide financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. 7. Debt Discount and Issuance Costs Debt discounts, premiums, and prepaid issuance costs are capitalized as an offset to long-term debt and amortized using the straight line method over the life of the related debt. Issuance costs for the District's tax-exempt commercial paper short-term borrowings are expensed as incurred. 8.Fund Balance Classifications In accordance with Government Accounting Standards Board 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, the District classifies governmental fund balances as follows: •Nonspendable fund balance includes amounts that cannot be spent either because it is not in spendable form or because of legal or contractual constraints. •Restricted fund balance includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by providers, such as creditors or amounts constrained due to constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. •Committed fund balances includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by the government through formal action of the highest level of decision making authority and does not lapse at period-end. Committed fund balances were imposed by the District’s Board of Directors resolution. Any changes to committed fund balance requires the approval of two-thirds of the Board. Committed fund balances were imposed by the District’s Board of Directors as follows: o Infrastructure: $18.6 million; projected minimum requirement for expansion of field and office facilities over the next five years. o Equipment Replacement: $3 million; projected requirement for equipment and vehicle replacement based on the amount of accumulated depreciation recorded on capital assets in service. o Capital maintenance: $5 million; amounts com44mitted to reserve for future capital repairs and maintenance. o Future acquisitions and capital projects: $6 million; amounts committed to reserve for future capital acquisitions and projects. o Promissory Note: $0.9 million; amounts committed to payment of promissory note. •Assigned fund balance includes amounts that are intended to be used for specific purposes that are neither considered restricted or committed. Fund balance may be assigned by the General Manager, pursuant to Board Policy 3.07, if authorized by the Board of Directors to make such designations. At June 30, 2020, the District had assigned $710,000 in fund balance for ongoing projects. •Unassigned fund balance includes positive amounts within the general fund which has not been classified within the above-mentioned categories and negative fund balances in other governmental funds. The District uses restricted/committed amounts to be spent first when both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available unless there are legal documents/contracts that prohibit doing this, such as a grant agreement requiring dollar for dollar spending. Additionally, the District would first use committed, then assigned, and lastly unassigned amounts of unrestricted fund balance when expenditures are made. 9. Net Position Net position represents the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Net investment in capital assets consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balances of any borrowings used for the acquisition, construction or improvement of those assets. In addition, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets or related debt also are included in the net investment in capital assets component of net position. Net position is reported as restricted when there are limitations imposed on its use either through the enabling legislation adopted by the District or through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, laws or regulations of other governments. The District applies restricted resources when an expense is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted net position is available. Unrestricted net position reflect amounts that are not subject to any donor-imposed restrictions. This class also includes restricted contributions whose donor-imposed restrictions were met during the fiscal period. A deficit unrestricted net position may result when significant cash balances restricted for capital projects exist. Once the projects are completed, the restriction on these assets are released and converted to capital assets. 10. Pension For purposes of measuring the net pension liability and deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the District’s California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) plan and additions to/deductions from the plan’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by CalPERS. For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions - an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 (GASB Statement No. 68) requires that the reported results pertain to liability and asset information within certain defined timeframes. For this report, the following time frames were used: Valuation Date (VD) ....................................... June 30, 2018 Measurement Date (MD) ................................ June 30, 2019 Measurement Period (MP) .............................. July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 11. Other Postemployment Benefits Oher Than Pensions (OPEB) For purposes of measuring the net OPEB liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, and OPEB expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the District’s Retiree Benefits Plan (the OPEB Plan) and additions to/deductions are based on the when they are due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms for the measurement period included in the OPEB plan’s actuarial reports. Investments are reported at fair value, except for money market investments and participating interest-earning investment contracts that have a maturity at the time of purchase of one year or less, which are reported at cost. Valuation Date June 30, 2019 Measurement Date June 30, 2019 Measurement Period July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 12. Property Taxes The District receives property tax revenue from Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties (the Counties). The Counties are responsible for assessing, collecting and distributing property taxes in accordance with state law. Secured property taxes are recorded as revenue when apportioned, in the fiscal period of the levy. The counties apportion secured property tax revenue in accordance with the alternate method of distribution prescribed by Section 4705 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. This alternate method provides for crediting each applicable fund with its total secured taxes upon completion of the secured tax roll - approximately October 1 of each year. Taxes are levied annually on July 1st, and one-half are due by November 1st and one- half by February 1st. Taxes are delinquent after December 10th and April 10th, respectively. Supplemental property taxes are levied on a pro-rata basis when changes in assessed valuation occur due to the completion of construction or sales transactions. Liens on real property are established on January 15th for the ensuing fiscal period. On June 30, 1993, the Board of Supervisors adopted the "Teeter" method of property tax allocation. This method allocates property taxes based on the total property tax billed. At year- end, the Counties advances cash to each taxing jurisdiction equal to its current year delinquent taxes. Once the delinquent taxes are collected, the revenue from penalties and interest remains with each County and is used to pay the interest cost of borrowing the cash used for the advances. 13. Accounting Estimates The presentation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates. I. Upcoming Accounting and Reporting Changes GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities The objective of this Statement is to improve guidance regarding the identification of fiduciary activities for accounting and financial reporting purposes and how those activities should be reported. This Statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments. The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary activity and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary activities. The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2018 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2019, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases The objective of this statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments. This statement increases the usefulness of governments’ financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments’ leasing activities. The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2019 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District is in the process of determining the impact this Statement will have on the financial statements. GASB Statement No. 89, Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred Before the End of the Construction Period This Statement addresses interest costs incurred before the end of a construction period be recognized as an expense in the period in which the cost is incurred for financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. As a result, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period will not be included in the historical cost of a capital asset reported in a business- type activity or enterprise fund. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2019 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2020, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 90, Majority Equity Interests - an Amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 61 The objectives of this Statement are to improve the consistency and comparability of reporting a government’s majority equity interest in a legally separate organization and to improve the relevance of financial statement information for certain component units. This Statement also requires that a component unit in which a government has 100 percent equity interest account for its assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at acquisition value at the date the government acquired a 100 percent equity interest in the component unit. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2018, but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2019, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. The requirements should be applied retroactively, except for the provisions related to (1) reporting a majority equity interest in a component unit and (2) reporting a component unit if the government acquires a 100 percent equity interest. Those provisions should be applied on a prospective basis. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations The objectives of this Statement are to provide a single method of reporting conduit debt obligations by issuers and eliminate diversity in practice associated with (1) commitments extended by issuers, (2) arrangements associated with conduit debt obligations, and (3) related note disclosures. This Statement also clarifies the existing definition of a conduit debt obligation; establishing that a conduit debt obligation is not a liability of the issuer; establishing standards for accounting and financial reporting of additional commitment and voluntary commitments extended by issuers and arrangements associated with the debt obligations; and improving required note disclosures. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2020 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 92, Omnibus 2020 The objectives of this Statement are to enhance comparability in accounting and financial reporting and to improve the consistency of authoritative literature by addressing practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements. This Statement establishes accounting and financial reporting requirements for specific issues related to leases, intra- entity transfers of assets, postemployment benefits, government acquisitions, risk financing and insurance-related activities of public entity risk pools, fair value measurements, and derivative instruments. The requirements of this Statement apply to the financial statements of all state and local governments. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2020 but have been delayed to periods beginning after June 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District does not believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 93, Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates This Statement establishes accounting and financial reporting requirements related to the replacement of IBORs in hedging derivative instruments and leases. It also identifies appropriate benchmark interest rates for hedging derivative instruments. The requirements of this Statement apply to the financial statements of all state and local governments. The requirements of this Statement apply to the financial statements of all state and local governments. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2020 but have been delayed to periods beginning after June 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District does not believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 94, Public-Private Partnerships and Public-Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements The primary objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by addressing issues related to public-private and public-public partnership arrangements (PPPs). As used in this Statement, a PPP is an arrangement in which a government (the transferor) contracts with an operator (a governmental or nongovernmental entity) to provide public services by conveying control of the right to operate or use a nonfinancial asset, such as infrastructure or other capital asset (the underlying PPP asset), for a period of time in an exchange or exchange-like transaction. Some PPPs meet the definition of a service concession arrangement (SCA), which the Board defines in this Statement as a PPP in which (1) the operator collects and is compensated by fees from third parties; (2) the transferor determines or has the ability to modify or approve which services the operator is required to provide, to whom the operator is required to provide the services, and the prices or rates that can be charged for the services; and (3) the transferor is entitled to significant residual interest in the service utility of the underlying PPP asset at the end of the arrangement. This Statement also provides guidance for accounting and financial reporting for availability payment arrangements (APAs). As defined in this Statement, an APA is an arrangement in which a government compensates an operator for services that may include designing, constructing, financing, maintaining, or operating an underlying nonfinancial asset for a period of time in an exchange or exchange-like transaction. The requirements of this Statement are to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2022. Earlier application is encouraged. The District does not believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS Summary of Cash and Investments The following summarizes deposits as of June 30, 2020: Cash and Cash Equivalents Available Cash and Investments for Operations Restricted Total Cash Deposits: Cash in Banks 1,033,881$ 48,810$ 1,082,691$ Cash with Fiscal Agent - 4,062,851 4,062,851 Petty Cash 1,091 - 1,091 Total Cash Deposits 1,034,972 4,111,661 5,146,633 Investments: California Local Agency Investment Fund 6,697,753 - 6,697,753 CalTRUST - 1,671,245 1,671,245 Brokerage Accounts/Cash with Fiscal Agents 11,013,890 40,769,369 51,783,259 Santa Clara County Pool 34,530,740 4,809,675 39,340,415 Total Investments 52,242,383 47,250,289 99,492,672 Total Cash and Investments 53,277,355$ 51,361,950$ 104,639,305$ Cash in Banks Cash balances in banks are insured up to $250,000 per insured bank by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The District’s accounts are held with various banks. As of June 30, 2020, the District’s bank balances exceeded FDIC coverage by $1,044,181. Fair Value Measurements GASB 72 established a hierarchy of inputs to the valuation techniques above. This hierarchy has three levels: • Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 inputs are quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other than quoted prices that are not observable • Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, such as a property valuation or an appraisal. The District has the following investments with recurring fair value measurements as of June 30, 2020: 12 Months 13 - 24 25 - 60 More Than Rating Fair Value or Less Months Months 60 Months Money Market Accounts n/a 8,484,426$ n/a 8,484,426$ -$ -$ -$ 8.53% Municipal Bonds AAA/A-9,518,348 Level 2 7,036,204 1,862,806 - 619,338 9.57% Corp/Gov Bonds AAA/A-31,177,588 Level 1 27,339,627 3,837,961 - - 31.36% LAIF n/a 6,730,658 Level 2 6,730,658 - - - 6.77% CalTrust A+f 1,671,245 Level 2 - - 1,671,245 - 1.68% Santa Clara County Pool n/a 39,340,415 Level 2 21,302,411 6,139,634 11,898,370 - 39.57% U.S. Obligations AA+/A-2,503,435 Level 1 2,503,435 - - - 2.52% Total Investments 99,426,115$ 73,396,761$ 11,840,401$ 13,569,615$ 619,338$ 100.00% Concen- trationsInvestment Type Input Level Maturities Cash in Santa Clara County Treasury Santa Clara County is a fiscal agent of the District. The fair value of the District's investment in the county pool is reported at amounts based on the District's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by the County Treasurer for the entire portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of the portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by the County Treasurer, which is recorded on the amortized costs basis. Santa Clara County investment pool funds were available for withdrawal on demand and had an average maturity date of less than one year. All cash and investments are stated at fair value. Pooled investment earnings are allocated monthly based on the average cash and investment balances of the various funds of the County. California Local Agency Investment Fund The District is a participant in the Local Agency investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The District reports its investment in LAIF at the fair value amount provided by LAIF, which is the same as the value of the pool share. The balance is available for withdrawal on demand, and is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities, loans to certain state funds, and floating rate securities issued by federal agencies, government-sponsored enterprises, United States Treasury Notes and Bills, and corporations. At June 30, 2020, these investments had an average maturity date of less than one year. Investment Trust of California The District is a participant in the Investment Trust of California (CalTRUST) which is a California joint powers authority that has been established by its members pursuant to an agreement. The California Government Code provides that Public Agencies may purchase shares of beneficial interest issues by a joint powers authority, such as CalTRUST, organized pursuant to the Section 6500 of the Act. The District reports its investment in CalTRUST at the fair value amount provided by CalTRUST. The District participates in the Medium-Term Fund with CalTRUST. The balance in this Medium-Term Fund is available for withdrawal once a week (on Wednesdays), and is based on the net asset value per share on the Wednesday of each week. Included in CalTRUST's investment portfolio for the Medium-Term Fund are collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities, loans to certain state funds, and floating rate securities issued by federal agencies, government-sponsored enterprises, United States Treasury Notes and Bills, and corporations. At June 30, 2020, these investments had an average maturity date of 2 to 5 years. Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements The District must maintain required amounts of cash and investments with trustees or fiscal agents under the terms of certain debt issues. These funds are used if the District fails to meet its obligations under these debt issues. Restricted for Debt Service As of June 30, 2020, the District had $4,149 held by Zions bank as trustee, pledged to the payment or security of its outstanding bond issues. The District also had $4,809,675 held by the County during the period which was pledged to the payment or security of its outstanding bonds. All transactions associated with debt service were administered by the Bank or County. Restricted for Hawthorne Property Maintenance On November 10, 2011, the District received the gift of the 79-acre Hawthorne property, in Portola Valley, California, and an endowment of $2,018,445 to manage the property in perpetuity. The cash balance restricted for this purpose at June 30, 2020 was $1,671,245. Restricted for Measure AA Bond Projects As of June 30, 2020, the District had $33,044,310 held by Zions bank as trustee, pledged to specific projects related to the acquisition of property to protect and preserve natural open space lands, constructions of public access improvements and recreation and capital enhancements to open space lands to restore disturbed natural areas back to their original condition and function. Restricted for Staffing Facilities As of June 30, 2020, the District had $7,720,572 held by Zions bank as trustee, pledged to finance portion of the cost of acquiring and improving staffing facilities for use by the District. Restricted for Historic Picchetti Reserve As of June 30, 2020, the District had $48,810 held with Wells Fargo, pledged for upkeep on the Picchetti Ranch brick winery building and farm complex. Restricted Cash with Fiscal Agent For the year ended June 30, 2020, the District had a balance of $4,063,202 in a Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) Pension Rate Stabilization Program (PRSP) 115 irrevocable trust for pensions. Participating agencies maintain oversight of investment management and control over the risk tolerance level. Assets in the plan can be accessed to offset unexpected rate increases or be used as a rainy day fund related to their pension plan (CalPERS). These assets are not dedicated to providing plan benefits to plan participants and are not directly used to pay benefits until such time as the District transfers the funds from the PARS trust to the pension plan (CalPERS). The trust restricts the use of the assets to be used solely for pension related expenses. Policies and Practices The District's Investment Policy and the California Government Code allow the District to invest in the following, provided the credit ratings of the issuers are acceptable to the District and approved percentages and maturities are not exceeded. The table below also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code or the District's Investment Policy where it is more restrictive: Authorized Investment Type Maximum Remaining Maturity Maximum Percentage of Portfolio Maximum Investment in one Issuer Medium Term Notes 5 years 30%No Limit Money Market and Mutual Funds N/A 20%10% U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years No Limit No Limit Federal Agency Securities 5 years No Limit No Limit Banker's Acceptance 180 days 40%30% Commercial Paper 270 days 25%10% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30%No Limit Repurchase Agreements 1 year No Limit No Limit Reverse Repurchase Agreements 92 days 20%No Limit Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)N/A $40 million per account No Limit a) Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to the changes in market interest rates. The District manages its exposure to interest rate risk by investing in the Santa Clara County investment pool and LAIF, which had fair values of approximately $9 billion and $101 billion, respectively as of June 30, 2020, and diversifying its investments, as noted above, through the utilization of brokers. b) Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The investment with the County’s investment pool is governed by the County’s general investment policy. The County’s investments in 2020 included U.S. government securities or obligations explicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government that are not considered to have credit risk exposure. See the schedule above for a summary of the District’s ratings by investment type. c) Custodial Credit Risk – Deposits Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the District’s deposits may not be returned to it. The District does not have a policy for custodial credit risk for deposits. However, the California Government code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by State or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under State law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110 percent of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure public deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150 percent of the secured public deposits and letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco having a value of 105 percent of the secured deposits. d) Concentration of Credit Risk Concentration of credit risk is the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of an investor’s holdings in a single issuer. The District’s investment in the County’s commingled pool is diversified by the County Treasurer by limiting the percentage of the portfolio that can be invested in any one issuer’s name. Investments in U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Agency securities explicitly backed by the U.S., and mutual and pooled funds are not subject to this limitation. More than 5% of the County’s commingled pooled investments are invested with the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Federal Farm Credit Bank. NOTE 3 - INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS Interfund Receivables and Payables Interfund transactions are reported as loans or transfers. The District utilizes interfund transactions to account for funding received by the General Fund which is then distributed to the other funds for special uses, such as payment of debt or capital project and to supplement other funding sources. Loans are reported as interfund receivables and payables, as appropriate, and are subject to elimination upon consolidation. The following interfund loans were outstanding at fiscal year end June 30, 2020: Fund Due from Other Funds Due to Other Funds General Fund 9,308,458$ 9,391,445$ Meas ure AA Capital Projects Fund 9,702,604 9,308,458 GF Capital Projects Fund - 311,159 Total 19,011,062$ 19,011,062$ At June 30, 2020, interfund transfers consisted of the following: Fund Transfer In Transfer Out General Fund 889,920$ 20,220,354$ GF Capital Projects Fund 9,827,543 889,920 Debt Service Fund 10,392,811 - Total 21,110,274$ 21,110,274$ NOTE 4 - NOTES RECEIVABLE On December 17, 1997, the District sold the title to and possession of a 50-year fee determinable estate 10-acre parcel near the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. The District financed the purchase in the amount of $288,800 over 25 years at a rate of 10% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments of $2,634 are due on the 1st of each month and late if not paid by the 10th, with the final payment scheduled December 1, 2022. The outstanding balance at June 30, 2020 was $74,509. NOTE 5 - CAPITAL ASSETS AND DEPRECIATION Capital asset activity for the period ended June 30, 2020 is shown below: Balance Deletion s/Balance Capital Assets June 30, 2019 Additions Adjustments June 30, 2020 Non-depreciable: Land 437,763,645$ 12,885,114$ (550,000)$ 450,098,759$ Construction in Progress 16,193,374 10,966,455 (9,846,322) 17,313,507 Total Non-Depreciable 453,957,019 23,851,569 (10,396,322) 467,412,266 Depreciable: Structure and Improvements 28,204,751 1,374,750 550,000 30,129,501 Infrastructure 34,798,646 8,978,747 - 43,777,393 Equipment 2,652,783 161,159 - 2,813,942 Vehicles 5,240,790 154,727 (106,991) 5,288,526 Total Depreciable 70,896,970 10,669,383 443,009 82,009,362 Less Accumulated Depreciation for: Structure and Improvements (10,145,021) (866,293) - (11,011,314) Infrastructure (5,256,432) (1,427,640) - (6,684,072) Equipment (1,539,169) (182,666) - (1,721,835) Vehicles (3,353,958) (647,280) 98,148 (3,903,090) Total Accumulated Depreciation (20,294,580) (3,123,879) 98,148 (23,320,311) Total Depreciable Capital Assets - Net 50,602,390 7,545,504 541,157 58,689,051 Total Capital Assets - Net 504,559,409$ 31,397,073$ (9,855,165)$ 526,101,317$ NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM LIABILITIES The following is a summary of the changes in long-term liabilities for the period ended June 30, 2020: Beginning Ending Due Within Long-term Liabilities Balance Additions Deductions Balance One Year Promissory Notes (Direct Borrowings): Current Interest 24,239,999$ -$ 1,285,000$ 22,954,999$ 1,370,000$ Capital Appreciation 6,580,602 - - 6,580,602 - Accreted interest 2,927,510 507,362 - 3,434,872 - Unamortized Premium 5,151,823 - 183,690 4,968,133 - Subtotal Promissory Notes 38,899,934 507,362 1,468,690 37,938,606 1,370,000 Bonds: Current Interest 179,090,000 - 7,830,000 171,260,000 7,025,000 Unamortized Bond Premium 20,415,576 - 1,120,342 19,295,234 - Subtotal Bonds 199,505,576 - 8,950,342 190,555,234 7,025,000 Net Pension Liability 10,412,478 8,696,336 7,280,187 11,828,627 - Net OPEB Liability 1,862,277 1,163,653 1,525,086 1,500,844 - Compensated Absences 2,368,387 732,284 323,520 2,777,151 883,885 Total Long-term Liabilities 253,048,652$ 11,099,635$ 19,547,825$ 244,600,462$ 9,278,885$ Compensated absences, other postemployment benefits and pension liabilities are paid by the fund for which the employee worked, which included General Fund and MAA Capital Projects Funds. Promissory Notes Hunt Living Trust Promissory Note On April 1, 2003, the District entered into a $1,500,000 promissory note with the Hunt Living Trust as part of a lease and management agreement. The note is due in full on April 1, 2023 and bears interest at 5.5% semi-annually through April 1, 2013 and 5.0% per annum until the maturity, or prior redemption, of the note. 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes On January 19, 2012, the District advance refunded $34,652,643 in 1999 lease revenue bonds by issuing $31,264,707 in promissory notes. The 2012 notes bear interest rates ranging from 2.00% to 6.04%. The notes are a blend of current interest and capital appreciation notes maturing through 2042. The net proceeds of $33,295,663 (after payment of $278,683 in underwriting fees, insurance, and other issuance costs and a premium of $2,309,638) were used to purchase U.S government securities. Those securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the 1999 Series bonds. As a result, the 1999 Series bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the long-term debt in the financial statements. The 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes were partially defeased during fiscal year 2018 with issuance of the 2017 Refunding Bond as noted below. The notes are secured by limited ad valorem property taxes levied upon all taxable property in the District. 2015 Refunding Promissory Notes On January 22, 2015, the District advance refunded $29,986,962 in 2004 Revenue Bonds by issuing $28,578,500 in promissory notes. The 2015 notes bear interest rates ranging from 2.00% to 5.00%. The notes are current interest notes maturing through 2035. The net proceeds of $28,325,491 (after payment of $253,009 in underwriting fees, insurance, and other issuance costs and a premium of $4,948,500) were used to purchase U.S government securities. Those securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the 2004 Revenue Bonds. As a result, the 2004 Revenue Bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the long-term debt in the financial statements. The notes are secured by limited ad valorem property taxes levied upon all taxable property in the District. Revenue and General Obligation Bonds 2011 Revenue Bonds On May 19, 2011, the Authority, on behalf of the District, issued $20,500,000 of 2011 Revenue Bonds for the purpose of acquiring land to preserve and use as open space and pay bond issue and related costs. The Bonds are not general obligations. Each period, the District will appropriate revenues-mainly limited properly tax collections that Santa Clara County and San Mateo County allocate to the District – to pay its obligations under a Lease Agreement for use and occupancy of District land in addition to other District debt and lease obligations unrelated to this financing. The Current Interest Bonds bear interest at 2.0% to 6.0% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Principal payments on the Current Interest Bonds are due annually September 1. This Bond was partially defeased during fiscal year 2017 with issuance of the 2016 Refunding Series A and B Green Bonds as noted below. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2015A and 2015B General Obligation Bonds On July 29, 2015, the District issued $40,000,000 of 2015A general obligation bonds and $5,000,000 of 2015B federally taxable general obligation bonds to finance certain projects authorized by voters. The bonds bear interest from 1.5% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $2,559,224 with an underwriter’s discount of $107,599 and issuance costs of $170,000. The bonds are secured by ad valorem property taxes levied by the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2016A and 2016B Refunding Green Bonds On September 8, 2016 the District issued $54,490,000 of 2016 Refunding Series A and $2,920,000 of 2016 Refunding Series B Green Bonds for the purpose of refunding its outstanding obligations under the 2007 Series A Revenue Refunding Bonds and prepay a portion of its obligations under the 2011 Lease Revenue Bonds. As a result, the 2007 Series A Revenue Refunding Bonds and the 2011 Lease Revenue Bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the government-wide financial statement of net position. The refunding resulted in a difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt of $5,032,161, which is reported as a deferred outflow on the government-wide statement of net position. This difference, reported in the accompanying financial statements as a deduction from bonds payable, is being charged to operations through fiscal year 2036 using the straight-line method. The District completed the refunding to obtain an economic gain (difference between the present value of the old and the new debt service payments) of $12,694,440. The 2016 Refunding Green Bonds Series A bears interest from 2.0% to 5.0% and the Series B bears interest of 0.73%. Interest for both Series A and B are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Principal payments for Series A began September 2017 and are due annually thereafter until September 2036. Series B has only one principal payment in September 2017. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2017 Series A Refunding Green Bonds On December 13, 2017 the District issued $25,025,000 of 2017 Refunding Green Bonds for the purpose of partially refunding its outstanding obligations under the 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes. The proceeds of the 2017 Refunding Green Bonds, together with $676,232 of other District funds, were used to defease and redeem $11,605,000 principal amount of the District’s outstanding 2012 Current Interest Notes and $8,894,106 initial principal of the District’s outstanding 2012 Capital Appreciation Notes, collectively, the 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes. The amounts defeased have been removed from the government-wide financial statement of net position. The refunding resulted in a difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt of $4,113,597, which is reported as a deferred outflow on the government-wide statement of net position. This difference, reported in the accompanying financial statements as a deduction from bonds payable, is being charged to operations through fiscal year 2033 using the straight-line method. The District completed the refunding to obtain an economic gain (difference between the present value of the old and the new debt service payments) of $8,882,524. The 2017 Refunding Green Bonds bears interest from 3.125% to 5.0%. Interest is due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Principal payments begin September 2025 and are due annually thereafter until September 2037. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2017 Series B Parity Bonds On December 13, 2017, the District issued $11,220,000 of 2017 parity bonds to finance portion of the cost of acquiring and improving staffing facilities for use by the District. The bonds bear interest of 5% and are due semi-annually on June 30 and December 30. The bonds were issued at a premium of $1,413,434 and issuance costs of $133,434. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2018 General Obligation Bonds On February 1, 2018, the District issued $50,000,000 of 2018 general obligation bonds to finance 25 projects specified in Measure AA. The bonds bear interest from 2% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $3,691,291 with an issuance costs of $455,462. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. The following schedule summarizes the District’s outstanding promissory notes and bonds as of June 30, 2020: Original Beginning Ending Long Term Debt Issue Balance Additions Retirements Balance Promissory Notes (Direct Borrowings): Hunt Note 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 2012 Refunding Note Current Int.15,790,000 1,729,999 - 410,000 1,319,999 2012 Refunding Note Cap Apprec.15,474,708 6,580,602 - - 6,580,602 2015 Refunding Note 23,630,000 21,010,000 - 875,000 20,135,000 Subtotal Promissory Notes 56,394,708 30,820,601 - 1,285,000 29,535,601 Bonds: 2011 Lease Revenue 20,500,000 750,000 - 215,000 535,000 2015A General Obligation Bonds 40,000,000 40,000,000 - - 40,000,000 2015B General Obligation Bonds 5,000,000 2,460,000 - 905,000 1,555,000 2016 Refunding Bonds 57,410,000 50,435,000 - 3,025,000 47,410,000 2017 Refunding Bonds 25,025,000 25,025,000 - - 25,025,000 2017 Parity Bonds 11,220,000 10,420,000 - 940,000 9,480,000 2018 General Obligation Bonds 50,000,000 50,000,000 - 2,745,000 47,255,000 Subtotal Bonds 209,155,000 179,090,000 - 7,830,000 171,260,000 Accreted Interest: 2012 Refunding Note 2,927,510 507,362 - 3,434,872 Subtotal Accreted Interest 2,927,510 507,362 - 3,434,872 Unamortized Bond Premium 25,567,399 - 1,304,032 24,263,367 Total Long Term Debt 265,549,708$ 238,405,510$ 507,362$ 10,419,032$ 228,493,840$ The promissory notes future debt service requirements as of June 30, 2020 were as follows: Year Ending June 30,Principal Remaining Accretion Interest Total 2021 1,370,000$ -$ 1,084,025$ 2,454,025$ 2022 1,445,000 - 1,029,625 2,474,625 2023 3,040,000 - 963,950 4,003,950 2024 1,170,000 - 825,750 1,995,750 2025 1,225,000 - 765,875 1,990,875 2026-2030 7,507,418 - 2,814,875 10,322,293 2031-2035 13,778,183 6,328,738 927,250 21,034,171 2036-2040 - 2,190,790 - 2,190,790 Total Debt Service 29,535,601$ 8,519,528$ 8,411,350$ 46,466,479$ The bonds future debt service requirements as of June 30, 2020 were as follows: Year Ending June 30,Principal Remaining Accretion Interest Total 2021 7,025,000$ -$ 7,161,901$ 14,186,901$ 2022 6,675,000 - 6,895,263 13,570,263 2023 6,990,000 - 6,589,537 13,579,537 2024 7,375,000 - 6,239,763 13,614,763 2025 7,780,000 - 5,865,663 13,645,663 2026-2030 39,265,000 - 23,247,577 62,512,577 2031-2035 24,405,000 - 16,590,233 40,995,233 2036-2040 37,695,000 - 9,736,138 47,431,138 2041-2045 21,580,000 - 4,720,000 26,300,000 2046-2050 12,470,000 - 867,000 13,337,000 Total Debt Service 171,260,000$ -$ 87,913,075$ 259,173,075$ Amortization of the deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2020 was as follows: Beginning Balance 9,395,702$ Amortization (845,125) Ending Balance 8,550,577$ NOTE 7 - RENTAL INCOME The District rents certain land and structures to other entities under operating leases with terms generally on a month-to-month basis. Rental income of $2,275,834 was received during the period ended June 30, 2020. NOTE 8 - CALPERS PENSION PLAN Pension Plan General Information about the Pension Plans Plan Description - The District provides benefits to eligible employees through cost-sharing multiple employer defined benefit pension plans (the Plan(s)) administered by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). Members of the Plan include all permanent employees working full-time. Benefit provisions under the Plans are established by State statute and District resolution. CalPERS issues publicly available reports that include a full description of the pension plans regarding benefit provisions, assumptions and membership information that can be found on the CalPERS website. Benefits Provided - CalPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full-time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 55 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non-industrial disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost of living adjustments for the Plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. The Plans’ provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2020, are summarized as follows: Tier 1 PEPRA Benefit formula 2.5% @ 55 2% @ 62 Benefit vesting schedule 5 Years 5 Years Benefit payments Monthly for Life Monthly for Life Retirement age 55 62 Monthly benefits as a % of eligible compensation 2.0% to 2.5%2.00% Required employee contribution rates 8.000%6.750% Required employer contribution rates 11.432%6.985% Miscellaneous Employees Covered – At June 30, 2020, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms for the Plan: Miscellaneous Active 154 Transferred 55 Separated 73 Retired 81 Total 363 Contributions - Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions for the Plan are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CalPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The District is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions As of June 30, 2020, the District reported net pension liabilities for its proportionate shares of the net pension liability as follows: Miscellaneous Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability/(Asset) $ 11,828,627 The District’s net pension liability for the Plan is measured as the proportionate share of the net pension liability. The net pension liability of the Plan is measured as of June 30, 1899, and the total pension liability for the Plan used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 1899 using standard procedures. The District’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on a projection of the District’s long-term share of contributions into the pension plan relative to the projected contributions of all participating employers, as actuarially determined. The District’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for the Plan as of fiscal years June 30, 1899 and 2020 was as follows: Miscellaneous Proportion - June 30, 2019 0.27629% Proportion - June 30, 2020 0.29538% Change - Increase/(Decrease)0.01910% For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the District recognized pension expense of $3,818,097. At fiscal year June 30, 2020, the District reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resou rces Deferred Inflows of Resources Changes of Assumptions 564,044$ 199,949$ Differences between Expected and Actual Experience 821,548 63,653 Differences between Projected and Actual Investment Earnings - 206,801 Differences between Employer's Contributions and Proportionate Share of Contributions 131,657 1,042,638 Change in Employer's Proportion 1,032,142 57,627 Pension Contributions Made Subsequent to Measurement Date 1,534,253 - Total 4,083,643$ 1,570,668$ The District reported $1,534,253 as deferred outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement date that will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2021. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows: 1,017,319$ (64,915) (15,469) 41,788 - - 978,723$ Deferred Outflows/ (Inflows) of Resources Fiscal Year Ending June 30: Thereafter Total 2022 2023 2024 2025 2021 Actuarial Assumptions - The total pension liabilities in the June 30, 1899 actuarial valuations were determined using the following actuarial assumptions: Valuation Date June 30, 2018 Measurement Date June 30, 2019 Actuarial Cost Method Entry-Age Normal Cost Method Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate 7.15% Infla t ion 2.50% Payroll Growth 2.75% Projected Salary Increase (1) Investment Rate of Return 7.15% (2) Mortality (3) (1) Varies by entry age and service (2) Net of pension plan investment expenses, including inflation (3) Derived using CalPERS' membership data for all funds Discount Rate - The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.15 percent for each Plan. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.15 percent discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long term expected discount rate of 7.15 percent will be applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF). The stress test results are presented in a detailed report that can be obtained from the CalPERS’ website. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building- block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical returns of all the funds’ asset classes, expected compound returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long-term (11-60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the rounded single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short- term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and adjusted to account for assumed administrative expenses. The table below reflects the long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. Assumed Asset Real Return Real Return Asset Class (a)Allocation Years 1 - 10 (b)Years 11+ (c) Global Equity 50.00% 4.80% 5.98% Fixed Income 28.00% 1.00% 2.62% Inflation Sensitive 0.00% 0.77% 1.81% Private Equity 8.00% 6.30% 7.23% Real Estate 13.00% 3.75% 4.93% Liquidity 1.00% 0.00% -0.92% Total 100.00% (a) In the System's CAFR, Fixed Income is included in Global Debt Securities; Liquidity Liquidity is included in Short-term Investments; Inflation Assets are included in both Global Equity Securities and Global Debt Securities. (b) An expected inflation of 2.0% used for this period. (c) An expected inflation of 2.92% used for this period. Sensitivity of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate - The following presents the District’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for the Plan, calculated using the discount rate for the Plan, as well as what the District’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage point lower or 1- percentage point higher than the current rate: Miscellaneous 1% Decrease 6.15% Net Pension Liability 21,676,810$ Current 7.15% Net Pension Liability 11,828,627$ 1% Increase 8.15% Net Pension Liability 3,699,648$ Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial reports. PARS Section 115 Trust - During fiscal year 2017-18, the District established a Section 115 Trust Fund for Pension Costs with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS). The amount in this trust is not included as part of the District's net pension liability calculation. NOTE 9 - POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION BENEFITS Plan Description - The District joined the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit postemployment healthcare plan administered by CalPERS. See eligibility requirements below. Retiree benefit continues to surviving spouse if retiree elects survivor annuity under CalPERS retirement plan. The OPEB plan’s audited financial statements are available at https://www.calpers.ca.gov/docs/forms-publications/gasb-75-schedule-changes-fiduciary-net-position- 2017.pdf. Benefits Provided - The following is a summary of the plan benefits provided: Eligibility:Retire directly from the District under CalPER (age 50 and 5 years of service) Continue participation in PEMHCA Retiree Medical Benefit:District pays retiree medical premiums up to: - $300/month effective 1/1/07 - $350/month effective 1/1/09 Must be at least equal to statutory PEMHCA minimum ($122 in 2015, $125 in 2016) PEMHCA Administrative Fee:District pays CalPERS administrative fees (0.32% of premiums for 2015/16) Surviving Spouse Continuation:Retiree beneift continues to surviving spouse if retiree elects survivor annuity under CalPERS retirement plan Minimum Age:Retirement under CalPERS Employees Covered by Benefit Terms - At June 30, 2019 (the valuation date), the benefit terms covered the following employees: Active employees 156 Inactive employees 40 Total employees 196 Contributions - The District makes contributions based on an actuarially determined rate and are approved by the authority of the District’s Board. Total contributions during the year were $572,539. Total contributions included in the measurement period were $670,768. The actuarially determined contribution for the measurement period was $643,000. The District’s contributions were 3.79% of covered payroll during the measurement period June 30, 2019 (reporting period June 30, 2020). Employees are not required to contribute to the plan. Actuarial Assumptions - The following summarized the actuarial assumptions for the OPEB plan included in this fiscal year: Valuation Date:June 30, 2019 Measurement Date:June 30, 2019 Actuarial Cost Method:Entry age normal, level precentage of payroll Amortization Period:7.5 years Asset Valuation Method:Investment gains and loses spread over 5-year rolling period Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate 6.75% General Inflation 2.75% Payroll Increases Aggregate - 3% Merit - CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Medical Trend Non-medicare - 7.25% for 2021, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years Medicare - 6.3% for 2021, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years PEMHCA Minimum Increases 4.25% Mortality, Retirement, Disability, Termination CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Mortality Improvement Post-retirement mortality projected fully generational with Society of Actuaries Scale MP-2019 Healthcare Participation for Future Retirees Currently covered: 90% Currently waived: 60% Discount Rate - The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that the District contribution will be made at rates equal to the actuarially determined contribution rates. Based on those assumptions, the OPEB plan's fiduciary net position was projected to cover all future OPEB payments. Therefore, the discount rate was set to be equal to the long-term expected rate of return which was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total OPEB liability. Long-Term Expected Rate of Return - The long-term expected rate of return on OPEB plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of OPEB plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Percentage of Portfolio Long-Term Expected Rate of Return Global Equity 59% 4.82% Fixed Income 25% 1.47% TIPS 5% 1.29% Commodities 3% 0.84% REITs 8% 3.76% Total 100% Net OPEB Liability - The District's net OPEB liability was measured as of June 30, 2019 (measurement date), and the total OPEB liability used to calculate the net OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2019 (valuation date) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 (reporting date). The following summarizes the changes in the net OPEB liability during the year ended June 30, 2020, for the measurement date of June 30, 2019: Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 (Measurement Date June 30, 2019) Total OPEB Liability Plan Fiduciary Net Position Net OPEB Liability (Asset) Balance at June 30,2019 5,631,356$ 3,769,079$ 1,862,277$ Service cost 330,788 - 330,788 In terest in Total OPEB Liability 397,289 - 397,289 Employer contributions - 670,768 (670,768) Balance of diff between actual and exp experience (156,450) - (156,450) Balance of changes in assumptions (30,520) - (30,520) Actual investment income - 232,579 (232,579) Administrative expenses - (807) 807 Benefit payments (152,768) (152,768) - Net changes 388,339 749,772 (361,433) Balance at June 30, 2020 6,019,695$ 4,518,851$ 1,500,844$ Covered Employee Payroll 16,838,000$ Total OPEB Liability as a % of Covered Employee Payroll 35.75% Plan Fid. Net Position as a % of Total OPEB Liability 75.07% Service Cost as a % of Covered Employee Payroll 1.96% Net OPEB Liability as a % of Covered Employee Payroll 8.91% Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources - At June 30, 2020, the District reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between actual and expected experience -$ 141,407$ Difference between actual and expected earnings - 46,787 Change in assumptions - 27,585 OPEB contribution subsequent to measurement date 638,539 - Totals 638,539$ 215,779$ Of the total amount reported as deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB, $638,539 resulting from District contributions subsequent to the measurement date and before the end of the fiscal year will be included as a reduction of the net OPEB liability in the year ended June 30, 2021. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows: Year Ended June 30, 2021 (41,894)$ 2022 (41,894) 2023 (21,294) 2024 (13,618) 2025 (17,978) Thereafter (79,101) Total (215,779)$ OPEB Expense - The following summarizes the OPEB expense by source during the year ended June 30, 2020, for the measurement date of June 30, 2019: Service cost 330,788$ Interest in TOL 397,289 Expected investment income (254,386) Difference between actual and expected experience (15,043) Difference between actual and expected earnings (23,916) Change in assumptions (2,935) Administrative expenses 807 OPEB Expense 432,604$ The following summarizes changes in the net OPEB liability as reconciled to OPEB expense during the year ended June 30, 2020, for the measurement date of June 30, 2019: 1,500,844$ (1,862,277) (361,433) Changes in deferred inflows 123,269 Employer contributions and implict subsidy 670,768 OPEB Expense 432,604$ Net OPEB liability ending Net OPEB liability begining Change in net OPEB liability Sensitivity to Changes in the Discount Rate - The net OPEB liability of the District, as well as what the District's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher, is as follows: (1% Decrease )6.75%(1% Increase ) Net OPEB Liability (Asset)2,393,070$ 1,500,844$ 774,353$ Discount Rate Sensitivity to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rates - The net OPEB liability of the District, as well as what the District's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher than current healthcare cost trend rates, is as follows: (1% Decrease )4.25%(1% Increase ) Net OPEB Liability (Asset)1,247,285$ 1,500,844$ 1,852,525$ Trend Rate NOTE 10 - JOINT VENTURES (JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS) The District is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. Prior to July 1, 2002, the District managed and financed these risks by purchasing commercial insurance. On July 1, 2002, the District joined the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CAL JPIA). CAL JPIA is composed of 119 California public entities and is organized under a joint powers agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. The purpose of CAL JPIA is to arrange and administer programs for the pooling of self-insurance losses, to purchase excess insurance or reinsurance, and to arrange for group-purchased insurance for property and other coverages. CAL JPIA's pool began covering claims of its members in 1978. Each member government has an elected official as its representative on the Board of Directors. The Board operates through a nine-member Executive Committee. During the past three fiscal periods, none of the programs of protection have had settlements or judgments that exceeded pooled or insured coverage. There have been no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage from coverage in the prior period. Self-Insurance Programs of the CAL JPIA General and Automobile Liability Each government member pays a primary deposit to cover estimated losses for a fiscal year (claims year). General liability (GL) coverage includes bodily injury, personal injury, or property damage to a third party resulting from a member activity. The GL program also provides automobile liability coverage. Six months after the close of a fiscal period, outstanding claims are valued. A retrospective deposit computation is then made for each open claims year. Costs are spread to members as follows: the first $30,000 to $750,000 are pooled based on member's share of costs under $30,000; costs in excess of $750,000 are shared by the members based upon each individual member's payroll. Costs of covered claims above $5,000,000 are currently paid by reinsurance. The protection for each member is $50,000,000 per occurrence, up to $50,000,000. Worker's Compensation The District also participates in the Worker's Compensation program administered by CAL JPIA. Pool deposits and retrospective adjustments are valued in a manner similar to the General Liability pool. The District is charged for the first $50,000 of each claim. Costs from $50,000 to $100,000 per claim are pooled based on the member's losses under its retention level. Costs between $100,000 and $2,000,000 per claim are pooled based on payroll. Costs from $2,000,000 to $5,000,000 are paid by excess insurance purchased by CAL JPIA. The excess insurance provides coverage to statutory limits. Purchased Insurance Environmental Insurance The District participates in the Pollution and Remediation Legal Liability Program, which is available through CAL JPIA. The policy provides coverage for both first and third party damages, including certain types of cleanups; fuel spill or hazmat incidents; member listed non-owned disposal sites; above ground and underground storage tanks; and for sudden and gradual pollution at or from property, streets, sanitary sewer trunk lines and storm drain outfalls owned by the District. Coverage is on a claims-made basis. There is a $50,000 deductible. CAL JPIA has a limit of $50,000,000 for the three-year coverage period. The current coverage period is July 2017 through July 1, 2020. Each member of CAL JPIA has a $10,000,000 aggregate limit during the three-year period. The current coverage period is July 2017 through July 1, 2020. Property Insurance The District participates in the All-Risk property program of CAL JPIA which includes all-risk coverage for real and personal property (such as scheduled buildings, office furniture, equipment, vehicles, etc). This insurance is underwritten by several insurance companies. Property is currently insured according to a schedule of covered property submitted by the District to CAL JPIA. The All-Risk deductible is $5,000 per occurrence; $1,000 for non-emergency vehicles. Premiums for the coverage are paid annually and are not subject to retroactive adjustments. Boiler & Machinery Insurance The District participates in the optional coverage for boiler and machinery, which is purchased separately under the property program. Coverage is for physical damage for sudden and accidental breakdown of boilers and machinery, and electrical injury. There is a $5,000 per accident or occurrence deductible. Crime Insurance The District participates in the crime program of CAL JPIA in the amount of $1,000,000 per claim, with a $2,500 per occurrence deductible. Insurance provides coverage for employee dishonesty, failure to faithfully perform duties, forgery, counterfeiting, theft, robbery, burglary, and computer fraud. Premiums are paid annually and are not subject to retroactive adjustments. Special Event Tenant User Liability Insurance The District participates in the special events program of CAL JPIA which provides liability insurance when District premises are used for special events. The insurance premium is paid by the tenant user to the District according to a schedule. The District then pays the insurance arranged through CAL JPIA. There is no deductible and the District is added as additional insured. Liability limits are purchased in $1 million per occurrence increments. Vendors/Contractors Program General liability coverage with or without professional liability is offered through CAL JPIA to vendors/contractors who otherwise could not meet the District’s minimum insurance requirement: $1 million per occurrence, $2 million in aggregate. Cyber Liability Program The cyber liability program is partially covered under the liability program, and partially held through a stand-alone coverage program. Cyber liability provides coverage for both first- and third-party claims. First party coverage includes privacy, regulatory claims, security breach response, business income loss, dependent business income loss, digital asset restoration costs, and cyber-extortion threats, while third- party coverage includes privacy liability, network security liability, and multimedia liability. Members work directly with the reinsurer to investigate and respond to claims. There is a $1 million per occurrence limit of coverage, $1 million aggregate limit per policy period per member, and a $10 million aggregate limit of coverage for all members per policy period. NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation The District may be exposed to various claims and litigation during the normal course of business. However, management believes there were no matters that would have a material adverse effect on the District’s financial position or results of operations as of June 30, 2020. Commitments As of June 30, 2020, the District had remaining commitments of $20,617,862 towards construction and other contracts. These commitments are not liabilities of the District’s until services or goods have been rendered/received. The expected date of completion is between June 2020 and December 2099. NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Management has evaluated all subsequent events from the statement of financial position date of June 30, 2020, through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, December 1, 2020. Beginning in March 2020, the United States economy began suffering adverse effects from the COVID 19 Virus Crisis ("CV19 Crisis"). As of the date of issuance of the financial statements, the District had not yet suffered material adverse impact from the CV19 Crisis. However, the future impact of the CV19 Crisis on the District cannot be reasonably estimated. There were no other material subsequent events that required recognition or additional disclosure in the financial statements. Required Supplementary Information Page Intentionally Left Blank REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY SCHEDULES This schedule presents a comparison of the original budget, final budget and actual revenues and expenditures for General Fund. The schedule presents the difference between the final budget and actuals. PENSION SCHEDULES These schedules present information that shows the District's proportionate share of the pension liability in the cost sharing pools, actuarial information, and contributions. The proportionate share information is useful in determining the District's liability on relation to all other entities in the pool. POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT SCHEDULES These schedules present information that shows the District's total other postemployment benefits (OPEB), plan fiduciary net position, and contributions related to retiree healthcare benefits provided by the District. Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Property taxes 51,863,000$ 51,883,000$ 52,024,342$ 141,342$ Grant income 488,300 388,300 31,396 (356,904) Property management 1,078,000 1,078,000 2,655,179 1,577,179 Investment earnings 2,099,878 2,099,878 1,014,726 (1,085,152) Other revenues 479,157 479,157 261,702 (217,455) Total revenues 56,008,335 55,928,335 55,987,345 59,010 Expenditures: Current Salaries and employee benefits 25,349,838 25,460,977 23,240,060 2,220,917 Services and supplies 11,746,210 10,160,745 7,828,976 2,331,769 Capital outlay 48,000 - - - Total expenditures 37,144,048 35,621,722 31,069,036 4,552,686 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 18,864,287 20,306,613 24,918,309 4,611,696 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - - 889,920 889,920 Transfers out (18,071,600) (18,071,600) (20,220,354) (2,148,754) Total other financing sources (uses)(18,071,600) (18,071,600) (19,330,434) (1,258,834) Net change in fund balance 792,687 2,235,013 5,587,875 3,352,862 Fund balance beginning 51,352,588 51,352,588 51,352,588 - Fund balance ending 52,145,275$ 53,587,601$ 56,940,463$ 3,352,862$ The District employs budget control by object codes and by individual appropriation accounts. Budgets are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The budgets are revised during the year by the Board of Directors to provide for revised priorities. Expenditures cannot legally exceed appropriations by major object code. The originally adopted and final revised budgets for the General Fund are presented as Required Supplementary Information. The basis of budgeting is the same as GAAP. Transfers out exceeded budget as noted above because of the transfer to GF Capital Projects Fund for the District's capital projects and debt service payments. Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Budget to Actual (GAAP) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance General Fund Miscellaneous Plan Plan Measurement Date 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Fiscal Year Ended 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Contractually Required Contributions 1,461,069$ 1,358,520$ 1,514,352$ 1,763,650$ 1,358,184$ 1,534,253$ Contributions in Relation to Contractually Required Contributions 1,343,244 4,788,977 2,529,862 1,783,789 1,358,206 1,534,253 Contribution Deficiency (Excess)117,825$ (3,430,457)$ (1,015,510)$ (20,139)$ (22)$ -$ Covered Payroll 8,994,979$ 9,862,578$ 11,834,150$ 12,802,887$ 15,311,826$ 16,297,634$ Contributions as a % of Covered Payroll 14.93% 48.56% 21.38% 13.93% 8.87% 9.41% Notes to Schedule: Valuation Date: June 30, 2018 Assumptions Used: Entry Age Method used for Actuarial Cost Method Level Percentage of Payroll and Direct Rate Smoothing 3.8 Years Remaining Amortization Period Inflation Assumed at 2.5% Investment Rate of Returns set at 7.15% Fiscal year 2015 was the first year of implementation, therefore only six years are shown. The CalPERS discount rate was increased from 7.5% to 7.65% in fiscal year 2016 and then decreased from 7.65% to 7.15% in fiscal year 2018. The CalPERS mortality assumptions was adjusted in fiscal year 2019. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Pension Plan Contributions June 30, 2020 CalPERS mortality table based on CalPERS' experience and include 15 years of projected ongoing mortality improvement using 90 percent of Scale MP 2016 published by the Society of Actuaries Miscellaneous Plan Plan Measurement Date 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Fiscal Year Ended 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Proportion of Net Pension Liability 0.39847% 0.41627% 0.29137% 0.27962% 0.27629% 0.29538% Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability 9,848,203$ 11,420,126$ 10,121,906$ 11,022,824$ 10,412,478$ 11,828,627$ Covered Payroll 8,448,635$ 8,994,979$ 9,862,578$ 11,834,150$ 12,802,887$ 15,311,826$ Proportionate Share of NPL as a % of Covered Payroll 116.57% 126.96% 102.63% 93.14% 81.33% 77.25% Plan's Fiduciary Net Position as a % of the TPL 81.15% 79.23% 80.93% 82.04% 84.37% 83.84% Fiscal year 2015 was the first year of implementation, therefore only six years are shown. The CalPERS discount rate was increased from 7.5% to 7.65% in fiscal year 2016 and then decreased from 7.65% to 7.15% in fiscal year 2018. The CalPERS mortality assumptions was adjusted in fiscal year 2019. June 30, 2020 Schedule of Net Pension Liability Proportionate Shares Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Fiscal Year Ended 2018 2019 2020 Actuarially determined contribution (ADC) 609,000$ 624,000$ 643,000$ Less: actual contribution in relation to ADC (412,000) (670,768) (638,539) Contribution deficiency (excess) 197,000$ (46,768)$ 4,461$ Covered employee payroll 12,802,887$ 13,550,000$ 16,838,000$ Contributions as a % of covered employee payroll 3.22% 4.95% 3.79% Notes to Schedule: Assumptions and Methods Valuation Date: Measurement Date: Actuarial Cost Method: Amortization Period: Asset Valuation Method: Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate General Inflation Payroll Increases Medical Trend PEMHCA Minimum Increases Mortality, Retirement, Disability, Termination Mortality Improvement Healthcare Participation for Future Retirees Other Notes Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of June 30, two years prior to the end of the fiscal year in which contributions are reported. The discount rate decreased from 7.0% to 6.5% in fiscal year 2019 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Contributions for Postemployment Benefits June 30, 2020 There were no changes in benefit terms or trend rates Mortality improvement scale was updated to Scale MP-2019 from MP-2017 in fiscal year 2020 GASB 75 requires a schedule of contributions for the last ten fiscal years, or for as many years as are available if less than ten years are available. GASB 75 was adopted as of June 30, 2018. PPACA excise tax was repealed 12/20/19. Since this is after the June 30, 2019 measurement date, the excise tax is included in the June 30, 2019 Total OPEB Liability (TOL). 4.25% CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Post-retirement mortality projected fully generational with Society of Actuaries Scale MP-2019 Currently covered: 90% Currently waived: 60% June 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 Entry age normal, level precentage of payroll 7.5 years Investment gains and loses spread over 5-year rolling period 6.75% 2.75% Aggregate - 3% Merit - CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Non-medicare - 7.5% for 2019, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years Medicare - 6.5% for 2019, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years Fiscal Year Ended 2018 2019 2020 Total OPEB liability Service cost 313,000$ 321,153$ 330,788$ Interest 326,000 361,203 397,289 Differences between expected and actual experience - - (156,450) Changes of assumptions - - (30,520) Benefit payments (113,000) (162,000) (152,768) Net change in Total OPEB Liability 526,000 520,356 388,339 Total OPEB Liability - beginning 4,585,000 5,111,000 5,631,356 Total OPEB Liability - ending 5,111,000$ 5,631,356$ 6,019,695$ Plan fiduciary net position Employer contributions 513,000$ 412,000$ 670,768$ Net investment income 287,000 259,143 232,579 Benefit payments (113,000) (162,000) (152,768) Administrative expense (1,000) (6,064) (807) Net change in plan fiduciary net position 686,000 503,079 749,772 Plan fiduciary net position - beginning 2,580,000 3,266,000 3,769,079 Plan fiduciary net position - ending 3,266,000$ 3,769,079$ 4,518,851$ Net OPEB liability (asset)1,845,000$ 1,862,277$ 1,500,844$ Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total OPEB liability 63.90% 66.93% 75.07% Covered Employee Payroll 11,834,150$ 12,802,887$ 13,550,000$ Net OPEB liability as a percentage of covered employee payroll 15.59% 14.55% 11.08% Total OPEB liability as a percentage of covered employee payroll 43.19% 43.99% 44.43% Other Notes Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of June 30, two years prior to the end of the fiscal year in which contributions are reported. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Changes in Net OPEB Liability June 30, 2020 GASB 75 requires a schedule of contributions for the last ten fiscal years, or for as many years as are available if less than ten years are available. GASB 75 was adopted as of June 30, 2018. There were no changes in benefit terms or trend rates PPACA excise tax was repealed 12/20/19. Since this is after the June 30, 2019 measurement date, the excise tax is included in the June 30, 2019 Total OPEB Liability (TOL). Mortality improvement scale was updated to Scale MP-2019 from MP-2017 in fiscal year 2020 The discount rate decreased from 7.0% to 6.5% in fiscal year 2019. Supplementary Information Page Intentionally Left Blank SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY SCHEDULES These schedules present comparisons of the original budget, final budget and actual revenues and expenditures for major capital project funds and debt service funds. These schedules presents the difference between the final budget and actuals. BOND PROGRAM EXPENDITURES This schedule presents the program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program for the current year and the in total since the inception of the program. Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Grant income 2,108,421$ 2,108,421$ 1,498,087$ (610,334)$ Investment earnings - - 1,007,460 1,007,460 Total revenues 2,108,421 2,108,421 2,505,547 397,126 Expenditures: Current Salaries and employee benefits 471,697 406,558 375,893 30,665 Capital outlay 8,975,950 9,949,233 7,641,519 2,307,714 Total expenditures 9,447,647 10,355,791 8,017,412 2,338,379 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (7,339,226) (8,247,370) (5,511,865) 2,735,505 Net change in fund balance (7,339,226) (8,247,370) (5,511,865) 2,735,505 Fund balance beginning 37,944,253 37,944,253 37,944,253 - Prior period adjustment - - (131,009) (131,009) Fund balance beginning - as adjusted 37,944,253 37,944,253 37,813,244 131,009 Fund balance ending 30,605,027$ 29,696,883$ 32,301,379$ 2,604,496$ Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget to Actual (GAAP) Measure AA Capital Projects Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Grant income -$ 1,960,000$ 1,764,000$ (196,000)$ Investment earnings - - 216,363 216,363 Total revenues - 1,960,000 1,980,363 20,363 Expenditures: Capital outlay 10,546,595 13,520,219 12,459,954 1,060,265 Total expenditures 10,546,595 13,520,219 12,459,954 1,060,265 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (10,546,595) (11,560,219) (10,479,591) 1,080,628 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 7,775,425 7,775,425 9,827,543 2,052,118 Transfers out - - (889,920) (889,920) Total other financing sources (uses)7,775,425 7,775,425 8,937,623 1,162,198 Net change in fund balance (2,771,170) (3,784,794) (1,541,968) 2,242,826 Fund balance beginning 8,254,539 8,254,539 8,254,539 - Prior period adjustment - - 131,009 131,009 Fund balance beginning - as adjusted 8,254,539 8,254,539 8,385,548 131,009 Fund balance ending 5,483,369$ 4,469,745$ 6,843,580$ 2,373,835$ Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget to Actual (GAAP) GF Capital Projects Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Property taxes 5,435,350$ 5,435,350$ 5,226,322$ (209,028)$ Investment earnings 874,000 950,000 88,317 (861,683) Total revenues 6,309,350 6,385,350 5,314,639 (1,070,711) Expenditures: Debt service: Principal 17,669,563 17,669,563 9,115,000 8,554,563 Interest - - 8,554,563 (8,554,563) Total expenditures 17,669,563 17,669,563 17,669,563 - Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (11,360,213) (11,284,213) (12,354,924) (1,070,711) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 10,397,375 10,397,375 10,392,811 (4,564) Total other financing sources (uses)10,397,375 10,397,375 10,392,811 (4,564) Net change in fund balance (962,838) (886,838) (1,962,113) (1,075,275) Fund balance beginning 6,775,924 6,775,924 6,775,924 - Fund balance ending 5,813,086$ 5,889,086$ 4,813,811$ (1,075,275)$ Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget to Actual (GAAP) Debt Service Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Expenditures Expenditures from from July 1, 2019 Inception Project through through No. Project Description June 30, 2020 June 30, 2020 AA02 Regional: Bayfront Habitat Protection & Public Access Partnerships 4,304,545$ 6,351,216$ AA03 Purisima Creek Redwoods: Purisma-to Sea Trail, Watershed & Grazing 28,089 1,298,765 AA04 El Corte de Madera Creek: Bike Trail & Water Quality Projects 117,749 1,004,617 AA05 La Honda Creek - Upper Recreation Area 35,017 2,463,776 AA06 Hawthorn Public Access Improvements 4,647 31,249 AA07 Driscoll Ranch Public Access, Wildlife Protection & Grazing 144,070 12,305,504 AA08 La Honda/Russian Ridge: Upper San Gregorio Watershed - 2,153,910 AA09 Russian Ridge: Public Recreation, Grazing & Wildlife Protection 75,089 394,556 AA10 Coal Creek: Reopen Alpine Road for Trail Use 179,219 345,341 AA11 Rancho San Antonio: Interpretive Improvements, Refurbishing 132,064 165,328 AA15 Regional: Redwood Protection & Salmon Fishery Conservation 42,499 3,075,549 AA17 Regional: Complete Upper Stevens Creek Trail 331,108 2,386,441 AA18 South Bay Foothills: Saratoga-to-Sea Trail & Wildlife Corridor 599,539 734,398 * AA19 El Sereno Dog Park & Connections (715) 479,527 AA20 South Bay Foothills: Wildlife Passage/Ridge Trail Improvements 180,412 570,615 AA21 Bear Creek Redwoods: Public Recreation & Interpretive Projects 1,654,798 9,930,484 AA22 Sierra Azul: Cathedral Oaks Public Access & Conservation Projects 148,021 1,225,916 AA23 Sierra Azul: Mt Umunhum Public Access & Interpretation Projects 41,261 22,975,703 AA24 Sierra Azul: Rancho de Guadalupe Family Recreation - 1,591,996 AA25 Sierra Azul: Loma Prieta Area Public Access, Regional Trails/Habitat Projects - 410,150 Total MAA Bond Project Expenditures 8,017,412 69,895,041 Reimbursements from Grants, Contributions, and Other Funds (1,498,087) (4,813,700) Total MAA Bond Project Expenditures - Net Reimbursements 6,519,325$ 65,081,341$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Measure AA Bond Program Schedule of Program Expenditures June 30, 2020 * In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the District transferred prior period expenditures for the Saratoga to the Sea Project from the GF Capital Projects Fund. NOTE 1 - BACKGROUND Measure AA is a $300 million general obligation bond approved in June 2014 by over two-thirds of Midpen voters. Proceeds from bonds, which will be sold in a series over approximately the next 20-30 years, will be used to: • Protect natural open space lands • Open preserves or areas of preserves that are currently closed • Construct public access improvements such as new trails and staging areas • Restore and enhance open space land, which includes forests, streams, watersheds, and coastal ranch areas. On July 29, 2015, the District issued $40,000,000 of 2015A general obligation bonds and $5,000,000 of 2015B federally taxable general obligation bonds to finance certain projects authorized by voters. The bonds bear interest from 1.5% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $2,559,224 with an underwriter’s discount of $107,599 and issuance costs of $170,000. On February 1, 2018, the District issued $50,000,000 of 2018 general obligation bonds to finance 25 projects specified in Measure AA. The bonds bear interest from 2% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $3,691,291 with an issuance costs of $455,462. Land acquisition is the first step to open space conservation. The Vision Plan identified 50,000 acres of open space land that, when conserved, would significantly improve wildlife conditions, wetlands, watersheds, creeks, sensitive plant communities and healthy outdoor recreation. As of June 30, 2020, the District has acquired and / or preserved over 1,700 acres of land with $24 million in funding support from Measure AA Funds. NOTE 2 - OVERISGHT COMMITTEE The Oversight Committee is essential to implementing Measure AA and will consist of seven at-large members who reside within the District. The Committee convenes at least once a year and reviews annual Measure AA expenditures and Midpen’s Annual Audit and Accountability report. Each year, the Committee’s findings will be presented to the Board at a public meeting and will be posted on the District’s website. NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The basis of accounting utilized in preparation of this report may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the accompanying program statement is not intended to present the financial position and the results of operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Expenditures incurred with Measure AA Bond proceeds are recorded on a modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenue is recognized when it is measurable and available. Similarly, expenses are recognized when they are incurred, not when they are paid. Statistical Information Page Intentionally Left Blank Financial Trends Revenue Capacity Debt Capacity Demographic and Economic Information Operating Information Sources These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the District’s financial report relates to the services the District provides and the activities it performs: 1. Full-Time Equivalent Employees by Function 2. Capital Asset Statistics by Function 3. Operating Indicators by Function Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the Annual Financial Reports for the relevant year. STATISTICAL SECTION This part of the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements,note disclosures,and required supplementary information says about the District’s overall financial health. In contrast to the financial section, the statistical section information is not subject to independent audit. These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the District’s financial performance and well being have changed over time: 1. Net Position 2. Changes in Net Position 3. Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 4. Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds These schedules contain information in relation to the District’s property tax assessments: 1. Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property 2. Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates 3. Pricipal Property Tax Payers 4. Property Tax Levies and Collections These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the District’s current levels of outstanding debt and the District’s ability to issue additional debt in the future: 1. Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 2. Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 3. Legal Debt Margin Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the District’s financial activities take place: 1. Demographic and Economic Statistics 2. Principal Employers 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets 236,546$ 245,393$ 259,638$ 268,869$ 278,611$ 276,395$ 308,601$ 312,121$ 351,152$ 371,186$ Restricted 1,408 1,568 2,731 4,327 2,566 5,786 4,571 7,252 8,207 6,277 Unrestricted 28,142 42,738 36,919 37,951 39,948 39,280 23,831 29,415 8,015 14,617 Total Net Position 266,096$ 289,699$ 299,288$ 311,147$ 321,125$ 321,461$ 337,003$ 348,788$ 367,374$ 392,080$ Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Net Position (amounts expressed in thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Expenses Governmental activities Land preservation 13,768$ 14,312$ 19,338$ 17,930$ 19,478$ 26,080$ 21,783$ 28,910$ 34,304$ 32,482$ Interest and fiscal charges 6,739 7,483 7,273 7,163 7,202 9,752 8,327 8,193 10,449 9,874 Depreciation 882 806 840 1,095 1,232 1,311 1,585 2,399 - - Loss on refunding of debt - - - - - - - - - - Total governmental activities expenses 21,389 22,601 27,451 26,188 27,912 37,143 31,695 39,502 44,753 42,356 Program Revenues Governmental Activities Charges for Services 1,241 1,320 1,381 1,422 1,437 1,636 1,479 1,576 2,360 2,655 Grants and Contributions 1,393 1,453 913 1,901 953 1,194 651 1,613 1,082 3,293 Land donations 17 13,928 3,890 - - - - - - - Total governmental activities program revenues 2,651 16,701 6,184 3,323 2,390 2,830 2,130 3,189 3,442 5,948 Net (expense)/revenue - governmental activities (18,738) (5,900) (21,267) (22,865) (25,522) (34,313) (29,565) (36,313) (41,311) (36,408) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities Property taxes 27,269 28,737 30,270 32,433 35,082 44,980 43,861 47,798 54,395 57,251 Investment earnings 294 375 288 138 202 648 463 1,045 3,648 2,307 Use of money and property - - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 311 394 298 182 216 810 784 1,153 1,557 Total governmental activities 27,874 29,506 30,856 32,753 35,500 46,438 45,108 49,996 58,043 61,115 Change in Net Position Governmental activities 9,136 23,606 9,589 9,888 9,978 12,125 15,543 13,683 18,586 24,708 Prior period adjustments - - - 1,971 - (11,790) - (1,898) - - Total Changes in Net Position 9,136$ 23,606$ 9,589$ 11,859$ 9,978$ 335$ 15,543$ 11,785$ 18,586$ 24,708$ Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) (amounts expressed in thousands) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 General fund Reserved -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Unreserved, designated in - - - - - - - - - - Unreserved, reported in - - - - - - - - - - Nonspendable - - - - - - 55 36 186 206 Restricted 731 - - 1,702 1,702 1,971 1,971 1,467 1,432 5,527 Committed - - - - 20,400 35,400 35,400 55,300 29,288 30,518 Assigned - - - 5,000 - - - - 1,400 710 Unassigned 26,156 41,782 37,513 34,453 21,330 16,848 23,872 16,306 16,515 19,979 Total General Fund 26,887$ 41,782$ 37,513$ 41,155$ 43,432$ 54,219$ 61,298$ 73,109$ 48,821$ 56,940$ All other governmental funds Reserved -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Restricted 1,408 1,568 1,634 1,621 - 26,894 9,539 59,304 52,975 43,959 Total all other governmental funds 1,408$ 1,568$ 1,634$ 1,621$ -$ 26,894$ 9,539$ 59,304$ 52,975$ 43,959$ Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. The District has implemented GASB 54 effective fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. This Statement establishes new categories for reporting fund balance and revises the definitions for governmental fund types. The District opted not to change the previous years' data. (modified accrual basis of accounting) (amounts expressed in thousands) Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 REVENUES Property taxes 27,269$ 28,737$ 30,270$ 32,433$ 35,082$ 44,980$ 43,861$ 47,798$ 54,395$ 57,251$ Grant income 1,393 1,453 913 1,901 953 1,194 651 1,613 1,082 3,293 Property management 955 1,320 1,381 1,422 1,438 1,636 1,479 1,576 2,360 2,655 Investment earnings 294 375 288 150 216 666 480 1,064 3,649 2,327 Other 551 240 146 145 241 644 609 348 641 262 Land donation 17 13,928 - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUE 30,479 46,053 32,998 36,051 37,930 49,120 47,080 52,399 62,127 65,788 EXPENDITURES Land Preservation 13,682 13,996 18,713 17,303 18,272 28,965 25,807 28,226 29,186 31,445 Capital outlay 11,596 27,190 9,611 8,231 8,445 18,901 19,961 16,440 45,356 20,101 Debt service: Principal and advance refunding escrow 3,301 4,457 2,843 2,999 3,145 4,367 5,193 6,392 6,480 9,115 Interest and fiscal charges 4,786 5,355 6,034 5,859 5,749 6,478 7,190 6,597 9,191 8,555 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 33,365 50,998 37,201 34,392 35,611 58,711 58,152 57,655 90,213 69,216 EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES (2,886) (4,945) (4,203) 1,659 2,319 (9,591) (11,072) (5,256) (28,086) (3,428) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND USES Transfers in 7,974 9,827 8,877 8,858 8,894 12,146 15,839 9,409 49,929 21,110 Transfers out (7,974) (9,827) (8,877) (8,858) (8,894) (12,146) (15,839) (9,409) (49,929) (21,110) Other sources 850 20,000 - - - - - - - - Payment to refunded bond escrow agent - - - - - - (68,187) (27,660) - - Issuance of refunding debt - - - - - - 57,410 25,025 - - Advance refunding of revenue bonds - - - - (29,987) - - - - - Issuance of debt - - - - 28,325 45,000 - 61,220 - - Premium from debt issuances - - - - - 2,282 11,564 8,246 - - TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)850 20,000 - - (1,662) 47,282 787 66,831 - - SPECIAL ITEM OPEB Funding - - - - - - - - - - NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES (2,036)$ 15,055$ (4,203)$ 1,659$ 657$ 37,691$ (10,285)$ 61,575$ (28,086)$ (3,428)$ Capitalized capital outlay expenditures 11,596 27,190 9,611 8,231 8,445 18,901 19,961 16,440 45,356 20,101 Debt Service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 59.11% 70.11% 47.44% 51.19% 48.68% 37.44% 47.99% 46.02% 53.69% 56.19% Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) (amounts expressed in thousands) Fiscal Year Secured State Board Unsecured Total before Rdv. Increment Total after Rdv. Increment Total Direct Tax Rate 2011 108,672,177 5,138 6,448,241 115,125,556 110,403,735 1.00% 2012 110,480,451 5,192 6,843,137 117,328,780 112,337,379 1.00% 2013 115,665,767 5,192 7,574,405 123,245,364 117,796,453 1.00% 2014 125,816,313 5,192 8,032,680 133,854,185 128,261,360 1.00% 2015 134,293,819 3,616 8,134,278 142,431,713 136,364,266 1.00% 2016 148,710,117 3,616 8,236,861 156,950,594 151,221,560 1.00% 2017 161,457,837 3,616 8,664,927 170,126,380 163,586,434 1.00% 2018 174,219,310 3,616 9,773,726 183,996,652 177,153,795 1.00% 2019 188,007,378 8,646 10,266,764 198,282,788 191,359,437 1.00% 2020 201,019,887 8,646 9,814,574 210,843,107 203,359,598 1.00% Fiscal Year Secured State Board Unsecured Total before Rdv. Increment Total after Rdv. Increment Total Direct Tax Rate 2011 51,197,326 6,653 2,006,682 53,210,661 49,373,928 1.00% 2012 51,670,521 2,465 1,952,159 53,625,145 49,913,049 1.00% 2013 53,793,234 2,465 1,948,563 55,744,262 51,977,724 1.00% 2014 57,513,572 2,336 2,180,554 59,696,462 55,714,674 1.00% 2015 60,798,837 2,343 2,087,353 62,888,533 58,641,318 1.00% 2016 66,177,633 3,086 2,363,781 68,544,500 63,519,108 1.00% 2017 72,017,698 3,085 2,640,434 74,661,217 68,354,025 1.00% 2018 78,506,564 3,085 2,996,701 81,506,350 73,565,159 1.00% 2019 85,236,395 2,658 2,756,478 87,995,531 79,176,299 1.00% 2020 99,187,975 3,219 2,894,481 102,085,675 92,428,172 1.00% Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. County of San Mateo Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years (amounts expressed in thousands) County of Santa Clara Fiscal Year General Property Tax Levy Other Overlapping Governments Open Space District Total General Property Tax Levy Other Overlapping Governments Open Space District Total 2011 1.00000 0.14951 - 1.14951 1.00000 0.07530 - 1.07530 2012 1.00000 0.15060 - 1.15060 1.00000 0.08120 - 1.08120 2013 1.00000 0.18750 - 1.18750 1.00000 0.08060 - 1.08060 2014 1.00000 0.18740 - 1.18740 1.00000 0.07470 - 1.07470 2015 1.00000 0.18304 - 1.18304 1.00000 0.08530 - 1.08530 2016 4 1.00000 0.17807 0.00080 1.17887 1.00000 0.08420 0.00080 1.08500 2017 1.00000 0.17160 0.00060 1.17220 1.00000 0.10990 0.00060 1.11050 2018 1.00000 0.18133 0.00090 1.18223 1.00000 0.10300 0.00090 1.10390 2019 1.00000 0.17126 0.00180 1.17306 1.00000 0.09240 0.00180 1.09420 2020 1.00000 0.18202 0.00160 1.18362 1.00000 0.10020 0.00160 1.10180 Source: FY 2019-20 Tax Rate Books for San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 Due to the District’s size and that it is located in two counties (County of Santa Cruz excluded), there is no tax rate area that represents the typical total tax rate for the District. The above tax rate areas are the largest in terms of assessed valuation for each County’s portion of the District. 2 The 2019-20 assessed valuation of Tax Rate Area (TRA) 6-001 is $32,480,806.925 which is 10.38 % of the District’s total assessed valuation. 3 The 2019-20 assessed valuation of TRA 9-001 is $10,868,501,012 which is 3.47% of the District’s total assessed valuation. 4 Fiscal Year 2015-16 was the first year in which ad valorem property taxes authorized by Measure AA were levied. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Property Tax Rates Direct and Overlapping1 Property Tax Rates Last Ten Fiscal Years County of Santa Clara (Tax Rate Area 6-001) 2 County of San Mateo (Tax Rate Area 9-001) 3 Taxpayer Taxable Assessed Valuation Rank Percentage of Total Assessed Valuation Taxable Assessed Valuation Rank Percentage of Total Assessed Valuation Board of Trustees, Leland Stanford Jr. University 7,172,848$ 1 2.39%4,901,194$ 1 3.07% Google Inc.6,644,929 2 2.21%434,468 9 0.27% Campus Holdings Inc. 3,570,308 3 1.19%** Hibscus Properties LLC 1,326,840 4 0.44%** Sobrato Interests 1,157,587 5 0.39%** Apple Computer Inc. 1,134,606 6 0.38%690,518 2 0.43% Facebook Inc.920,644 7 0.31%** Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Inc.915,535 8 0.30%564,312 4 0.35% CW SPE LLC 756,467 9 0.25%** Yahoo Holdings Inc.669,497 10 0.22%476,573 7 0.30% Oracle Corp. 647,034 11 0.22%567,172 3 0.35% Menlo & Juniper Networks LLC 623,437 12 0.21%** Richard T. Spieker, Trustee 606,726 13 0.20%** Applied Materials Inc.588,404 14 0.20%361,679 10 0.23% Intuitive Surgical Inc.535,896 15 0.18%** Peninsula Innovation Partnersh LLC 491,710 16 0.16%** Woodland Park Property Owner LLC 419,212 17 0.14%** 441 Real Estate LLC 414,814 18 0.14%** Network Appliance Inc. 394,921 19 0.13%533,962 5 0.33% LinkedIn Corporation 393,656 20 0.13%** VII Pac Shores Investors LLC **485,618 6 0.30% Arden Realty LP **255,201 16 0.16% HCP Life Science REIT Inc.**315,451 12 0.20% Wells REIT II-University Circle LP **310,197 13 0.19% SPF Mathilda LLC **276,782 14 0.17% Silicon Valley CA I LLC **254,274 17 0.16% Redus Woodland LLC **276,516 15 0.17% Slough Redwood City LLC **244,474 20 0.15% MT SPE LLC **249,945 19 0.16% Hewlett Packard Co.**434,763 8 0.27% Symantec Corporation **252,481 10 0.16% Sun Microsystems Inc. **328,708 11 0.21% Total 29,385,071$ 9.79%12,214,288$ 7.64% * Information not available Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Principal Property Tax Payers Current Year and Nine Years Ago (amounts expressed in thousands) Fiscal Year 2011Fiscal Year 2020 Fiscal Year Santa Clara County Taxes Levied San Mateo County Taxes Levied Santa Clara County Collections % of County Levy San Mateo County Collections % of County Levy 2016 1,186,363$ 527,932$ 1,177,636$ 99.3% 524,982$ 99.4% 2017 968,301 431,711 962,730 99.4% 429,436 99.5% 2018 1,558,456 705,842 1,553,773 99.7% 701,923 99.4% 2019 3,365,744 1,532,834 3,348,991 99.5% 1,524,259 99.4% 2020 3,215,052 1,591,352 3,195,317 99.4% 1,577,126 99.1% Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 District's general obligation bond debt service levy. Prior years are not available. Levy began in FY2015-16 CollectionsLevy 1 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year General Obligation Bonds Debt Service Monies Available Total Taxable Assessed Value Percentage of Taxable AV 1 Per Capita 2 2011 - - - 159,777,663 0.000% 0.00 2012 - - - 162,250,428 0.000% 0.00 2013 - - - 169,774,177 0.000% 0.00 2014 - - - 183,976,034 0.000% 0.00 2015 - - - 195,005,584 0.000% 0.00 2016 45,000 3,116 41,884 214,740,668 0.020% 15.56 2017 44,225 2,194 42,031 231,940,459 0.018% 15.53 2018 104,570 5,785 98,785 250,718,954 0.039% 36.32 2019 102,880 6,776 96,104 270,535,736 0.036% 35.22 2020 88,810 4,814 83,996 295,787,770 0.028% * * Information not available Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 See the Schedule of Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property for property value data. 2 Population data can be found in the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding Last Ten Fiscal Years (amounts expressed in thousands, except per-capita amount) Fiscal Year General Obligation Bonds Lease Revenue Bonds Refunding Bonds Bond Premiums Notes Payable Total Taxable Assessed Value (AV) Percentage of Taxable AV Percentage of Personal Income Per Capita 2011 - 64,995 50,988 607 6,429 123,019 159,777,663 0.077% 0.102% 840.82 2012 - 51,947 49,179 2,515 36,898 140,539 162,250,428 0.087% 0.105% 873.73 2013 - 51,568 47,994 2,351 37,039 138,952 169,774,177 0.082% 0.102% 865.00 2014 - 51,021 50,665 2,188 36,285 140,159 183,976,034 0.076% 0.094% 811.01 2015 - 20,385 49,935 6,973 59,271 136,564 195,005,584 0.070% 0.083% 723.35 2016 45,000 20,290 47,300 9,087 58,698 180,375 214,740,668 0.084% 0.101% 903.18 2017 44,225 1,080 57,410 20,475 58,761 181,951 231,940,459 0.078% 0.094% 836.30 2018 104,570 930 78,870 26,839 34,466 245,675 250,718,954 0.098% 0.118% 1,048.69 2019 102,880 750 75,460 25,567 33,749 238,406 270,535,736 0.088%** 2020 98,290 535 72,435 24,263 32,971 228,494 295,787,770 0.077%** * Information not available Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. (1) Details regarding the District's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. (2) Refer to the Demographics Statistics for personal income and population data. Ratios of Outstanding Debt Last Ten Fiscal Years Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (amounts expressed in thousands, except per-capita amount) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Assessed Valuation: Assessed value subject to debt levy 159,777,663$ 162,250,428$ 169,774,177$ 183,976,034$ 195,005,584$ 214,740,668$ 231,940,459$ 250,718,954$ 270,535,736$ 295,787,770$ Total assessed valuation 159,777,663 162,250,428 169,774,177 183,976,034 195,005,584 214,740,668 231,940,459 250,718,954 270,535,736 295,787,770 Debt Applicable to Limitation: Total debt 6,429 36,898 37,039 36,285 59,271 58,698 58,761 34,466 33,749 32,971 Less: amount available for repayment - - - - - 3,116 2,194 5,785 6,776 4,814 Total debt applicable to limitation 6,429 36,898 37,039 36,285 59,271 55,582 56,567 28,681 26,973 28,157 Legal Debt Margin: Bonded debt limit (15% AV)23,966,649 24,337,564 25,466,127 27,596,405 29,250,838 32,211,100 34,791,069 37,607,843 40,580,360 44,368,166 Debt applicable to limitation 6,429 36,898 37,039 36,285 59,271 55,582 56,567 28,681 26,973 28,157 Legal debt margin 23,960,220$ 24,300,666$ 25,429,088$ 27,560,120$ 29,191,567$ 32,155,518$ 34,734,502$ 37,579,162$ 40,553,387$ 44,340,009$ Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Under California Government Code Section 61126 (b) the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District shall not incur bonded indebtedness that exceeds 15% of the total assessed property value. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Legal Debt Margin Information Last Ten Fiscal Years (amounts expressed in thousands) Fiscal Year Population 1 Personal Income 2 (in millions) Per Capita Personal Income 2 Median Age 3 School Enrollment 4 County Unemployment Rate 5 2011 1,805,767 120,376 66,406 36.0 266,256 9.6% 2012 1,832,983 133,912 72,792 36.2 270,109 8.2% 2013 1,860,687 136,176 72,927 36.4 273,701 6.8% 2014 1,882,230 149,650 79,055 36.6 276,175 5.2% 2015 1,906,511 165,265 86,188 36.8 276,689 4.3% 2016 1,925,306 178,496 92,505 36.8 274,948 3.9% 2017 1,936,052 193,680 100,177 37.0 273,264 3.4% 2018 1,947,798 209,020 107,877 37.2 271,400 2.9% 2019 1,954,286 ** 37.4 267,224 2.9% 2020 1,961,969 *** 263,449 10.7% Calendar Year Population 1 Personal Income 2 (in millions) Per Capita Personal Income 2 Median Age 3 School Enrollment 4 County Unemployment Rate 5 2011 727,319 58,201 79,903 39.4 92,097 7.9% 2012 736,760 65,113 88,058 39.6 93,674 6.8% 2013 747,186 65,696 87,711 39.3 93,931 5.6% 2014 753,472 71,043 93,765 39.4 94,567 4.3% 2015 760,769 78,540 102,606 39.8 95,187 3.5% 2016 766,649 82,357 107,207 39.5 95,502 3.2% 2017 769,570 90,249 117,389 39.6 95,620 2.9% 2018 772,372 97,265 126,392 39.9 95,103 2.5% 2019 774,485 ** 39.6 94,234 2.4% 2020 773,244 *** 93,554 10.8% * Information not available Data Sources 1 State of California Department of Finance - http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/e-4/2010-20/ 2 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis 3 U.S Census Bureau, American Community Survey 4 State of California Department of Education 5 State of California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Division Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Fiscal Years County of Santa Clara County of San Mateo Employer Number of Employees 1 Rank Percentage of Total Employment Number of Employees 2 Rank Percentage of Total Employment Apple Computer, Inc. 25,000 1 2.44%10,000 5 1.28% Google LLC 24,626 2 2.40%** County of Santa Clara 20,883 3 2.04% 15,550 1 1.99% Stanford University 16,919 4 1.65%10,101 4 1.29% Cisco Systems Inc. 14,674 5 1.43%13,000 2 1.60% Kaiser Permanente 12,500 6 1.22%5,000 10 0.64% Stanford Healthcare 10,034 7 0.98% 5,569 8 0.71% Tesla Motors Inc. 10,000 8 0.98%** Applied Materials, Inc. 8,500 9 0.83% * * Intel Corporation 8,500 10 0.82% 5,684 9 0.73% City of San Jose * * 6,623 6 0.85% Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co. * * 10,400 3 1.33% Hewlett-Packard Co. * * 5,001 7 0.64% Total 151,636 14.79% 86,928 11.06% Employer Number of Employees Rank Percentage of Total Employment Number of Employees Rank Percentage of Total Employment Facebook, Inc. 14,000 1 3.13%** Genentech Inc. 9,500 2 2.12%8,800 1 2.57% Oracle Corp. 7,535 3 1.68%5,600 3 2% County of San Mateo 5,570 4 1.25%6,079 2 1.78% Gilead Sciences, Inc. 4,000 5 0.89% * * Walmart Labs 2,000 6 0.45% * * YouTube 2,000 7 0.45%** Roberto Half International, Inc. 1,668 8 0.37% * * Sony Interactive Entertainment 1,602 9 0.36% * * Electronic Arts, Inc. 1,520 10 0.34% * * Kaiser Permanente * * 3,777 4 1.10% Mills-Peninsula Health Services * * 2,500 5 0.73% Visa, Inc. * * 2,462 6 0.72% Safeway, Inc. * * 2,075 7 0.61% San Mateo County Community College District * * 1,951 8 0.57% SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory * * 1,764 9 0.52% Set Medical Center * * 1,672 10 0.49% Total 49,395 11.04% 36,680 10.73% * Information not available Source: 1 Silicon Valley Business Journal, July 19, 2019 2 County of Santa Clara Finance Department. FY2009-10 CAFR 3 San Francisco Business Times - 2019 Book of Lists and California Employment Development Department 4 Latest information available for principal employers in the County of San Mateo. 2018 4 2010 County of San Mateo 3 County of Santa Clara Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Principal Employers Most Current Year and Nine Years Ago 2019 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Function Office of the General Manager 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Real Property 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Plannning 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 13.00 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 Engineering & Construction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 Public Affairs 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 11.00 12.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Admininstration Reception 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance 3.25 3.25 3.25 4.75 4.75 5.25 9.25 9.25 10.25 11.25 Human Resources 2.00 2.50 3.50 3.50 5.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Information Technology 1 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 5.50 7.50 7.50 8.50 8.50 Operations Administration 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Patrol 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 31.00 32.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Land/Facilities Maintenance 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 28.30 30.30 N/A N/A N/A N/A Resource Management 2 6.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Land & Facilities N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49.30 53.30 56.30 57.30 Visitor Services N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 41.90 41.90 41.90 43.40 General Counsel 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.50 3.50 Natural Resources 2 N/A 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Total 105.75 109.25 112.25 114.25 126.55 134.55 165.45 173.45 179.45 182.95 Source: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 In 2015, the GIS function was integrated into Information Technology from the Planning Department 2 In 2012, the Resource Management function under the Operations Department became the Natural Resources Department During 2015, the District underwent a complete reorganization which become effective during FY 2016-17. As part of the reorganization, the Planning Department was split with a new Engineering & Construction Department, a portion of Real Property and Operations became the new Land & Facilities Department, and part of Public Affairs and Operations/Patrol became the new Visitor Services Department. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Full-time Equivalent District Government Employees by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Function Land: Number of preserves 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 Acreage: Santa Clara County 32,380.35 32,990.49 33,006.79 33,158.80 33,259.21 33,366.71 33,449.99 33,628.15 33,631.06 33,631.06 San Mateo County 26,704.01 27,625.36 28,668.49 28,977.86 29,063.13 29,452.58 29,643.96 29,664.41 29,854.41 30,636.85 Santa Cruz County 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 less: easements and life estates held by other parties (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,802.88) (1,802.88) 782.44 Total 59,262.66 60,794.15 61,853.58 62,314.96 62,500.64 62,997.59 63,272.25 63,493.86 63,686.77 67,054.53 Facilities: Administrative office 1111111111 Field/patrol offices 2222222333 Visitor Center 2222222222 Vehicles & Equipment: Patrol vehicles 35 37 39 41 38 37 42 36 34 33 Service vehicles 333581013101114 Maintenance vehicles 6 8 9 13 16 19 25 29 31 31 Administrative vehicles n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 13 15 Motorcycles/ATVs/Electric bicycles 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 27 27 32 Bulldozers/excavators/tractors 17 17 20 21 21 23 23 20 23 23 Dump trucks 44445554611 Water Truck 1222222222 Trailers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25 27 31 Chippers/mowers 2224455555 Source: Midpenninsula Regional Open Space District Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Beginning with FY2017-18 the District is using a new system for classifying and tracking vehicles and equipment. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Capital Asset Statistics by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Function General Manager Board meetings 31 45 36 35 33 31 31 44 32 28 Resolutions adopted 41 56 20 39 61 61 40 46 47 43 Real Property Acres preserved Santa Clara County 547.04 492.99 16.30 152.01 100.41 107.50 83.28 178.18 2.11 - San Mateo County 115.17 921.35 1,043.14 309.37 393.26 81.45 191.38 20.46 190.00 782.44 Public Affairs Stewardship volunteer hours 11,314 11,843 11,232 13,579 14,354 15,839 17,440 16,088 15,910 10,296 Interpretation/education docent hours 5,433 4,669 5,559 4,718 5,828 4,462 4,697 4,320 4,438 975 Website visits 274,133 434,402 349,398 359,432 418,748 429,891 487,215 589,280 524,387 782,003 Bicycle Accident 22 36 37 30 20 26 19 37 13 30 Equestrian Accident 1 1 2 - 1 2 - - 1 3 Hiking/Running Accident 18 16 16 22 20 14 37 40 11 25 Other first aid 15 25 24 15 25 26 23 31 13 29 Search & rescue 15 10 8 5 8 3 4 2 2 4 Vehicle Accident 11 16 15 14 19 14 17 50 15 47 Fire 5 7 8 16 9 10 9 13 4 7 HazMat 3 - - 1 1 6 1 3 1 1 Citation/Juvenile Contact Report 509 526 737 617 825 767 678 592 405 387 Parking Citation 434 527 621 584 700 645 836 870 375 1,027 Arrests 1 1 2 1 4 3 2 - 2 2 Day Permits 1,059 1,235 1,237 1,521 2,154 2,541 2,530 2,676 2,417 1,350 Multi-day permits 248 225 253 306 306 321 366 419 361 313 Camping permits 259 341 336 393 476 573 613 570 571 441 Source: Midpenninsula Regional Open Space District Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Page Intentionally Left Blank Other Independent Auditor’s Reports INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Los Altos, California We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the District’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 1, 2020. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the District’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the District’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the District’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the District’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. December 1, 2020 San Jose, California Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 650-691-1200 info@openspace.org openspace.org PRINTED ON POST CONSUMER WASTE PAPER Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve by Lillian Oliveri Photos on front cover: Top photo: Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve by Joyce Pennell Second row, left to right: Monte Bello Open Space Preserve by Frank Yien; Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve by Melinda Horn; Monte Bello Open Space Preserve by Jack Owicki. Resolutions/2020/20-__FundTransfers 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20-___ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE INTO THE COMMITTED FOR FUTURE ACQUISITION/CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND WHEREAS, the Unassigned Fund Balance of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is $20,086,094 as of June 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, per the Fund Balance Policy as adopted by the Board of Directors on October 26, 2016, the minimum required Unassigned Fund Balance of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is $16,046,182 as of July 1, 2020; and WHEREAS, the District expects to require further funding in order to continue its program of land acquisition, and construction of capital projects; and WHEREAS, the General Manager recommends allocating unassigned funds from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance in order to increase the Committed for Future Acquisitions & Capital Projects Fund for the acquisition of additional land and future capital projects. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District does resolve as follows: SECTION ONE. The following transfer is approved and the General Manager or designee is authorized to implement said transfer as follows: $3,000,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to the Committed for Future Acquisitions & Capital Projects Fund. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on December 9, 2020, at a regular meeting thereof, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: APPROVED: Jed Cyr, Secretary Board of Directors Karen Holman, President Board of Directors ATTACHMENT 2 Resolutions/2020/20-__FundTransfers 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Hilary Stevenson, General Counsel I, the District Clerk of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District by the above vote at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above day. Jennifer Woodworth, District Clerk Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Board Policy Manual Statement of Investment Policy 3.08 Chapter 3 – Fiscal Management Effective Date: 1/8/97 Revised Date: 12/9/20 Prior Versions: 1/8/97; 1/10/01; 1/16/02; 1/8/03; 1/14/04; 1/12/05; 1/11/06; 1/10/07; 1/16/08; 1/13/10; 1/12/11; 1/11/12; 1/24/13; 1/22/14; 1/28/15; 8/12/15; 8/10/16; 5/10/17; 6/27/18 Board Policy 3.08 Page 1 of 4 Goals Goal 1. Capital Preservation The primary goal shall be to safeguard the principal of invested funds. The secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity needs of the District. The third objective shall be to achieve a return on funds consistent with this Policy. Temporarily idle funds shall be invested in a conservative manner, such that funds can always be withdrawn at, or just above or below, full invested value. Investments that offer opportunities for significant capital gains and losses are excluded. Goal 2. Liquidity Temporarily idle funds shall be managed so that normal operating cash needs and scheduled extraordinary cash needs can be met on a same day basis. Investments shall be sufficiently liquid to provide a steady and reliable flow of cash to the District to insure that all land purchases can be made promptly (within two weeks). Goal 3. Income Temporarily idle funds shall earn the highest rate of return that is consistent with capital preservation and liquidity goals and the California Government Code. Guidelines 1. Determination of Idle Funds The Controller shall prepare a cash flow projection prior to all investment decisions involving securities with a term to maturity exceeding one year. This cash flow projection shall be reviewed and evaluated by the General Manager or Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The General Manager or CFO is responsible for approving the Controller’s designation of the amount of funds available for investment for longer than one year. 2. Restricted Monies [a] MROSD Retiree Healthcare Plan: All funds are to be held by either: the Section 115 Trust California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) administered by CalPERS, Attachment 3 Board Policy 3.08 Page 2 of 4 or 2) the Section 115 Trust offered through PARS as approved by Board Resolution 18- 07. [b] Hawthorn Endowment Fund: All funds will be held in a separate account and invested in accordance with this policy. [c] Debt Service Reserve Funds Held by Bond Trustees: Funds held by such trustees shall be invested in accordance with the bond indenture or other agreement providing for the issuance and management of such debt. 3. General Fund Committed Reserves At least 20% of the total general fund committed reserve requirement shall be maintained, at all times, with the Santa Clara County Pooled Investment Fund (SCCPIF) and/or the State of California’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). 4. General Fund Unassigned Reserves In addition to any committed fund reserve requirement, at least 20% of the general fund reserve per the Fund Balance Policy 3.07 shall be maintained, at all times, with the SCCPIF and/or LAIF. 5. General Obligation Bond Proceeds Held by Fiscal Agent Bond Proceeds held by the District’s Fiscal Agent, either in the Debt Service Fund or Bond Proceeds Fund, shall be invested through the investment department of the Fiscal Agent and in accordance with the Fiscal Agent Agreement. 6. Non-Invested Funds Idle District funds not otherwise invested as permitted by this Policy shall be deposited with the Santa Clara County Pooled Investment Fund, the San Mateo County Treasurer’s Pooled Investment Fund, the State of California’s Local Agency Investment Fund or CalTRUST. 7. Selection of Investments The Controller is responsible for selecting investments and directing such security transactions that fit within the amounts and maturities as recommended by the Controller. The Controller will communicate such actions to the General Manager and CFO. 8. Prohibited Investments Investment in securities of companies in the non-renewable energy sector (e.g. coal, oil,natural gas, etc.) shall not be permitted. 9. Investments Instruments and Deposit of Funds Investments and deposits of funds shall be limited to those allowed by and subject to the procedures of Government Code Section 53600 et seq. and 53635 et seq. In the event of any Attachment 3 Board Policy 3.08 Page 3 of 4 conflict between the terms of this Policy, and the Government Code, the provisions of the Government Code shall prevail. Investments shall not be leveraged. Investments, and “derivatives,” that offer opportunities for significant capital gains and losses are excluded. If after purchase, securities are downgraded below the minimum required rating level, the securities shall be reviewed for possible sale with a reasonable amount of time after downgrade. Significant downgrades and the action taken or to be taken will be disclosed in the next monthly report. 10. Maximum Maturity The average maturity of the total District investment portfolio shall not exceed eighteen months and no investment, except for debt service reserve funds held by bond trustees, shall have a maturity of more than three years from the date of purchase. The maturity of investments in trustee-held debt service reserve funds shall not exceed the final debt service payment date of the bonds. 11. Diversification Investments shall meet the diversification test of Government Code Section 53601.7(c), stating that no more than 5% of the total investment portfolio may be invested in the securities of any one issuer, except for the obligations of the U.S. Treasury or U.S. Government Agencies. 12. Marketability For investments other than bank certificates of deposits the breadth of ownership and number of securities outstanding shall be sufficient to establish a secondary market in which investments can be readily converted to cash without causing a material change in their market value. 13. Acceptable Banks Bankers' Acceptances and Negotiable Certificates of Deposit may be purchased only from the District’s commercial bank or banks and savings and loan associations with over $1 billion of deposits and reporting profitable operations and which meet all applicable criteria of the Government Code. Certificates of Deposit may be purchased from other banks within Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties which meet all applicable criteria of the Government Code if the principal is fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 14. Acceptable Collateral Securities collateralizing bank or savings and loan deposits must be rated “A” or higher. 15. Investments in Name of District All investments purchased shall stand in the name of the District. Attachment 3 Board Policy 3.08 Page 4 of 4 16. Reporting The Controller shall submit a report of the District’s investment portfolio and security transactions to the Board of Directors by the second Friday of each calendar month in accordance with Government Code Sections 53607 and 53646. Such reports shall also be submitted to the General Manager, CFO and to the District’s auditor. 17. Purchase of Securities The Controller is authorized to purchase securities through the investment department of the District’s bond trustees and fiscal agents and as otherwise permitted by the Government Code. Any account resolutions required by bank investment departments will be submitted to the Board of Directors for approval prior to any trading through that bank. The bank or other investment institution from which authorized securities are purchased shall be instructed in writing only to purchase securities in the name of the District and that all matured funds shall be returned to the District’s commercial bank account. The bank shall also be instructed to send receipts for all transactions to the CFO and the District accounting department. Attachment 3 Rev. 1/3/18 R-20-148 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 8 AGENDA ITEM 50th Anniversary Celebration Preparations GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Review and provide input on the proposed scope of the 50th Anniversary Celebration plans. 2. Consider formation of an ad-hoc committee to provide continued involvement and timely decisions as planning progresses. SUMMARY In 2022, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (Midpen) will celebrate 50 years of open space preservation, natural resource protection and ecologically sensitive public access. Plans are under development to commemorate the milestone with a year-long celebration of Midpen’s founding, evolution and accomplishments to connect constituents to the next 50 years of open space preservation, natural resource protection and ecologically sensitive public recreation. This item was previously discussed by the Legislative, Funding, and Public Affairs Committee (LFPAC) on November 17. The General Manager and LFPAC recommend that the Board of Directors (Board) review and provide input on the proposed celebratory priorities for the 50th anniversary and consider formation of an ad hoc committee to guide the event preparations. DISCUSSION Founded by voter passage of Measure R in 1972, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District will celebrate 50 years of accomplishments in 2022. To mark the occasion, staff has initiated planning for a series of events throughout the 2022 calendar year. This milestone anniversary provides an opportunity to celebrate the agency’s founding, evolution and accomplishments and look forward to the next 50 years. A key objective for sharing Midpen’s legacy story widely is to increase public awareness and positive regard for the agency, deepen a collective understanding of why open space is important, and engage and celebrate our diverse partners, volunteers, Board and staff for our collective accomplishments. See Attachment 1 for the proposed scope of priority elements to be included in the anniversary year celebration. The following are highlights of the anniversary celebration plan: •ANNIVERSARY LOGO – to give a cohesive brand to celebration materials. •SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM – A science-themed symposium convened by Midpen could allow researchers, land managers, partners and the public to discuss the latest findings in R-20-148 Page 2 natural resource management, such as wildlife connectivity, vegetation management, fire resilience, ecosystem protection, GIS mapping, Sudden Oak Death and more. Following the symposium, an inclusive anniversary gathering for diverse partners can serve as a capstone to the celebration with speakers, honorees or awards. • FILM/VIDEO – A professionally produced documentary on “The Preservation of Public Open Space” could help people understand the benefits and complexities of preserving and maintaining open space. Ideally, the full-length film could be featured on local broadcast television, though we will produce as separate segments of approximately 10 minutes to be used online and in other ways. • EXPANDED OUTREACH - Anniversary-themed outreach events and activities will be interspersed throughout the year as a foundational element of the public celebration. We will increase the amount of tabling we do throughout the District at community events and in preserves. Anniversary-themed docent-led hikes, a hike/visit challenge and partnership events, such as community rides, will be considered. • MEDIA SUPPORT – a cohesive plan for both earned and paid media to promote events and stories related to the 50th Anniversary, through advertising, briefings and news releases. The Board’s review of and input on the full suite of ideas being proposed will help staff properly scope, resource load and budget for a successful celebration of 50 years of accomplishments in open space preservation, natural resource protection and ecologically sensitive public access. In addition, the Board is asked to consider formation of an ad hoc committee to help provide timely guidance as part of the preparations. As this work proceeds, decisions will need to be made in quick fashion to ensure that all the preparations are completed on time and within budget. FISCAL IMPACT Budgeting will begin upon finalization of the scope. The FY21 budget includes $15,000 for anniversary planning. This initial funding is proposed to cover graphic design and approximately three months of professional service consultant fees for event planning and video production assistance. Initial ballpark budget expectations will be developed for the items outlined in Attachment 1. If a symposium and/or celebratory gathering is pursued, costs can be significantly offset by entrance fees and sponsorships. Actual budgets will be developed with consultant assistance as the scope evolves. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This item was reviewed by the Legislative, Funding and Public Affairs Committee on November 17, 2020. The Committee suggested adding bus tours similar to those created for the Special Park District Forum in 2019 to allow partners to visit Midpen preserves and project. The scope document has been updated to show that this may potentially be accomplished by adding mobile workshops to the symposium. The Committee also discussed adding VIP tours, partner celebrations and the potential to solicit additional funding support from partners or corporate sponsors. Discussion also included opportunities to tie-in an open house for the new administrative office and the potential to name a trail in honor of Green Foothills founder Lennie Roberts who has been instrumental in Midpen’s success. The Committee discussed an appropriate budget range of $200,000 to $400,000 and supported the formation of an ad hoc R-20-148 Page 3 committee of the Board to provide continued involvement and timely decisions as planning progresses. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice was provided as required by the Brown Act. CEQA COMPLIANCE This item is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. NEXT STEPS Upon Board approval, staff will move forward with releasing requests for proposals for event planning assistance and video production with the goal of beginning engagements in April to finalize the anniversary plan scope, timeline and budget in June 2021. Attachment: 1. 50th Anniversary Celebration Initial Scope Responsible Department Head: Korrine Skinner, Public Affairs Manager Prepared by: Mike Kahn, Public Affairs Specialist II Attachment 1 50th Anniversary Plan Initial Scope Goals and Objectives To commemorate 50 years with a year-long celebration of Midpen’s founding, evolution and accomplishments to connect constituents with the next 50 years of open space preservation, natural resource protection and ecologically sensitive public recreation: • Increase public awareness of and positive regard for Midpen by celebrating accomplishments. • Tell the story of Midpen’s legacy, including why nature is essential, how open space is preserved, including the role of rural and working lands, and the partnerships involved. Key Elements of 50th Anniversary Celebration Plan for January 1-December 31, 2022 • Commemorative 50th Anniversary logo to be used throughout the year. • Science Symposium and Anniversary Gathering – with assistance from event planning consultant, plan a symposium to discuss land management research with public presentations and poster sessions, capped by an inclusive celebratory gathering for diverse partners. o Timing: Fall 2022 (Measure R passed 11/72) to lessen event conflicts and weather issues, and provide lead time for preparations. • Invite academic and partner organization to present research, panel discussion topics. • Consider potential to include tracks: land management, community engagement, public access. • Consider potential for mobile workshops to give participants the opportunity to visit Midpen preserves and projects. o Evening Anniversary gathering with speaker, potential for honorees or awards, such as founders or 50 under 50 looking to the future of open space leadership. o Potential to livestream or record symposium/celebratory gathering to broaden public access. • “The Preservation of Public Open Space” - with assistance from professional video production team, create 60-minute documentary exploring the big picture of what it takes to make public open space happen in the Bay Area, featuring Midpen and close partners: how a regional environmental protection vision was formed, people who were/are instrumental, what land purchases take, how land managers care for the land, how public access is planned and how it all comes together the create the essential benefits of nature. Built to be evergreen, as roughly six 10-minute segments to allow for additional use separately. o Segments: 1. Overview: Bay Area conservation movement and Measure R: Midpen formation, regional environmental protection vision, 2014 Vision Plan, Measure AA 2. Land Acquisition and Conservation – biodiversity, wildlife corridors, water, agriculture, Coastside Protection Area 3. Restoration Science & Natural Resources Protection 4. Public Access Planning & Community Engagement 5. Outreach, Interpretation and Environmental Education – connecting people to place and the essential benefits of nature 6. The future of open space (in perpetuity means forever) o Narrated by a recognizable, local figure. Attachment 1 o Potential for television broadcast - KQED (requires neutral funding), NBC Bay Area/Telemundo (could be OpenRoad special). • Expanded Outreach o Community Event Tabling • Develop anniversary-themed display and commemorative keepsake items. • Select event schedule that balances appearances across Wards (identify highly frequented community locations and established events, such as main libraries, downtown areas, large events, farmers markets, coastal clean-ups/beach festivals, community centers, neighborhood association meetings. o Preserve events focused on visitors to meet people where they are and encouraging people to come out, styled like the welcome table at the Bear Creek Redwoods opening weekends. Consider the potential to table at each preserve with open public access. Include bilingual staff/volunteers. o Administrative office open house. The 50th Anniversary coincides with moving to 5050 El Camino. o Increase history/anniversary-themed docent naturalist or staff-led hikes. Consider mountain biking and equestrian options. Create anniversary-themed curriculum for partner groups like Latino Outdoors and other youth groups. o Hike/visit challenge – create a challenge themed to historic milestones where visitors who complete the challenge get a prize. Develop commemorative keepsake for geocache locations. o Sponsor community bicycle rides – partner with SVBC at RSA (multimodal project tie in) and possibly RW too (bikeable). • Staff engagement o Create special commemorative clothing item. o Engage past staff on video to capture oral histories and promote career pathway stories. • Website – create significant 50th Anniversary presence on website, integrate videos and history content (new site will feature updated timeline). • Newsletters and social media o Celebrate key historic events every month (acquisitions, new projects and programs, key milestones – acreage, trails, studies, etc.). o Share remembrances from the community, partners, volunteers and staff (past and present). o Highlight partnerships and key leaders who have been instrumental in our history. • Create Anniversary edition of 2022 photo calendar • Add Anniversary-themed items to Midpen online store • Elevate key Midpen projects during anniversary year – opportunity to elevate project profiles during the year, implement anniversary/history tie-ins where applicable, and highlight key. partners and community leaders who have been instrumental in completing Midpen projects. • Media – develop a cohesive plan to promote events with advertising. Pitch stories and message themes through press briefings and news releases. o Include multilingual advertising in ethnic outlets. o Consider materials specifically for underserved communities. o Evaluate partnerships to show our film/video segments or other features. ### MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY R-20-146 Meeting 20-29 December 9, 2020 FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA ITEM 1 AGENDA ITEM Acceptance of the Annual Financial Report of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2020 CONTROLLER’S RECOMMENDATION Accept the Annual Financial Report. DISCUSSION In May 1996, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) and Santa Clara County established the Financing Authority with the purpose of providing financing assistance to the District to fund the acquisition and preservation of open space land and to finance public capital improvements. The current members of the Financing Authority Board of Directors are Board President Karen Holman (Chairperson), Board Director Yoriko Kishimoto, Board Director Pete Siemens, Board Director Larry Hassett, and Santa Clara County Board Supervisor Joe Simitian. Accordingly, the District and the Financing Authority are accounted as one blended unit for financial statement purposes. On November 20, 2020, the District’s independent auditors, Chavan & Associates, LLP., issued its report on the District’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020 (Attachment 1). Through June 30, 2020, the District has sold six series of Financing Authority bonds, with a total par value of $199.6 million. A summary of the six financings is shown in Table 1 below. Excluding the 2007 Bonds, which raised no new money and only refinanced existing Financing Authority bonds, the District has issued $140.4 million (net) of Financing Authority bonds, funding $77 million of new land acquisitions and repaying $60 million of prior public and private debt, which had been issued at higher interest rates and for shorter maturities. Table 1: District Financings Issuance Par Amount TIC* Purpose 1996 Bonds $29.9 M 6.25% $11M Land + pay-off 1988 Notes 1999-1 Bonds $29.7 M 5.26% $21M Land + pay-off 1992 Notes 1999-2 Bonds $28.4 M 5.93% $15M Land + pay-off 1990 Notes 2004 Bonds $31.9 M 4.99% $10M Land + pay-off 1993 Certificates of Participation 2007 Bonds $59.2 M 4.57% Pay-off 1996 & 1999-2 Notes 2011 Bonds $20.5 M 5.60% Purchase $20M of Land * TIC = Total Interest Cost, including all costs of issuance R-20-146 Page 2 Only a small piece of one Financing Authority bond issue remained outstanding on June 30, 2020, with a total outstanding balance of $535 thousand, repayable through FY22 (final payment on September 1, 2021). The interest cost of these outstanding Financing Authority bonds is 4.00%. A summary of the activity on the Financing Authority bonds in FY20 is shown below. Table 2: FY20 Financing Authority Activity ($ thousands) Balance June 30, 2019 Principal Paid Balance June 30, 2020 Interest Paid FY20 2011 Bonds $750 $215 $535 $25.70 There are no plans to issue additional debt through the Financing Authority. FISCAL IMPACT No unbudgeted fiscal impacts are associated with this item. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW This item was not previously reviewed by a Board Committee. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice was provided pursuant to the Brown Act. No additional notice is necessary. CEQA COMPLIANCE No compliance is required as this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act. NEXT STEPS An annual report will be provided until the bonds are paid in full (last payment is September 1, 2021). Attachment 1. District’s Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2020. Responsible Department Head: Stefan Jaskulak, Chief Financial Officer Prepared by: Andrew Taylor, Finance Manager Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2020 Headquarters in Los Altos, California Attachment 1 Page Intentionally Left Blank Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Prepared by: Finance and Administrative Services Page Intentionally Left Blank Introductory Section Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE INTRODUCTORY SECTION Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ 1 Transmittal Letter ........................................................................................................................ 3 Board of Directors & Management ............................................................................................. 9 Organizational Chart ................................................................................................................... 10 Regional Map .............................................................................................................................. 11 Achievement Award .................................................................................................................... 12 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor’s Report ..................................................................................................... 14 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ..................................................................................... 18 Basic Financial Statements: Government-Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position .............................................................................................. 28 Statement of Activities .................................................................................................. 29 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds ........................................................................... 32 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position ....................................................................................... 33 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance – Governmental Funds ................................................................. 34 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance to the Statement of Activities ................................. 35 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements .............................................................................. 38 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (GAAP) - General Fund ......................................................................... 74 Schedule of Pension Plan Contributions ..................................................................................... 75 Schedule of Net Pension Liability Proportionate Shares ............................................................. 76 Schedule of Contributions for Postemployment Benefits ........................................................... 77 Schedule of Changes in Net OPEB Liability ............................................................................... 78 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual (GAAP) - Measure AA Capital Projects Fund ...................................... 82 Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual (GAAP) - GF Capital Projects Fund ...................................................... 83 Schedule of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual (GAAP) - Debt Service Fund................................................................. 84 Measure AA Bond Program – Schedule of Program Expenditures ............................................. 85 Notes to Supplementary Information .......................................................................................... 86 STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position ................................................................................................................................. 90 Changes in Net Position .............................................................................................................. 91 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ...................................................................................... 92 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds .................................................................... 93 Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property ......................................................................... 94 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates ................................................................................ 95 Principal Property Tax Payers ..................................................................................................... 96 Property Tax Levies and Collections .......................................................................................... 97 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding .............................................................................. 98 Ratios of Outstanding Debt ......................................................................................................... 99 Legal Debt Margin Information .................................................................................................. 100 Demographic and Economic Statistics ........................................................................................ 101 Principal Employers .................................................................................................................... 102 Full-time Equivalent District Government Employees by Function ........................................... 103 Capital Asset Statistics by Function ............................................................................................ 104 Operating Indicators by Function ................................................................................................ 105 OTHER INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTS: Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ......................................... 108 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022 December 2, 2020 Members of the Board of Directors and Midpen Constituents: The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) for the year ended June 30, 2020, is hereby submitted. The CAFR has been prepared by the Finance Department in compliance with the principles and standards for financial reporting promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The CAFR consists of District management’s representations concerning the finances of the District and District management assumes full responsibility for completeness, accuracy of data, and fairness of presentation, including all footnotes and disclosures. Management believes the data presented are accurate in all material respects and that they are presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the District. The District’s accounting records for governmental operations are maintained on a modified accrual basis, with the revenues being recorded when both measurable and available, and expenditures being recorded when the services or goods are received, and the liabilities are incurred. District management has established a comprehensive framework of internal controls designed both to protect the District’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse; and to compile sufficiently reliable information for the preparation of the District’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, the District’s designed its controls to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. The CAFR has been audited by the independent certified public accounting firm of Chavan & Associates, LLP. The independent certified public accounting firm has issued an unmodified opinion on the District’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2020. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the financial statements. This letter of transmittal serves as a complement to the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PROFILE The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the “District”) was formed in 1972 to acquire and preserve public open space land in northern and western portions of the County of Santa Clara. In June 1976, the southern and eastern portions of the County of San Mateo were annexed to the District. The District annexed three parcels located in the northern tip of Santa Cruz County in 1992, but the 1% ad valorem property tax is not levied on this land for the benefit of the District. In September 2004, the District completed the Coastside Protection Program, which extended the District boundaries to the Pacific Ocean in the County of San Mateo County, from the southern borders of the City of Pacifica to the San Mateo/Santa Cruz County line. The District encompasses over 550 square miles of land located in the County of Santa Clara (approximately 200 square miles), the County of San Mateo (approximately 350 square miles) and the County of Santa Cruz County (approximately 2.6 square miles). The Counties of Santa Clara and San Mateo are referred to together as the “Counties.”, and approximately 770,000 people live within the boundaries of the District. The District has preserved nearly 65,000 acres of public land and manages 26 open space preserves within its mission to acquire and preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity, protect and restore the natural environment, and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive public enjoyment and education. A seven-member Board of Directors (Board), elected by individual ward, establishes policies for the District. Specifically, the Board sets general operating objectives for the District, authorized debt issuance, monitors financial and long-range planning, establishes policies governing conditions of employment, and sets policies to protect and enhance the natural and cultural resources of the District. Members of the Board of Directors are elected for staggered four-year terms. The Board appoints a General Manager to serve as the District’s chief executive officer. The General Manager provides direction and leadership to all District departments; and ensures that all District policies are implemented. The District is a legally separate and fiscally independent entity from other government agencies which may also provide governmental services within the same geographic area. The CAFR includes all funds of the District. There are no separate or legal entities or component units include in the financial statements of the District. The District has a blended component unit included in the financial statements of the District. In 1996, the District and Santa Clara County established the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority (Authority) to help the District finance improvements by buying land and building facilities in cooperation with the District. The President of the District’s Board of Directors is also the Chairperson of the Authority. Three District directors and a Supervisor from Santa Clara County are also on the Authority Board. In effect, the Authority operates in tandem with the District. FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL CONDITION The information presented in the financial statements is, perhaps best understood when considered from the broader perspective of the environment in which the District operates. State and Regional Economy At the end of 2019, Beacon Economics projected further solid growth in the California economy for 2020 with the northern California region continuing to outpace other parts of the nation with gains in the technology sector. This forecast was tempered by the region’s continuing issue with housing affordability and full employment. However, this forecast changed with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic when Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, followed by an executive order directing all Californians to stay home except for essential employment or shopping for essential needs. The County health officers of both San Mateo and Santa Clara ordered residents to shelter-in-place as of March 16, 2020. The updated UCLA Anderson Forecast released in June 2020 showed the expectation for a severe downturn in economic activity by the fourth quarter of 2020, with U.S. GDP slowing by 8.6% as compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. The national unemployment rate is expected to be 10%, with full recovery not expected until 2023. Given California’s large proportion of tourism and trans-Pacific transportation, the forecast showed the state’s unemployment rate rising to 14.6% by the end of the second quarter as it sheds 2.2 million payroll jobs. In its most recent report for Fall 2019, Beacon Economics report shows that job growth in the South Bay area continues to expand a rate much higher than the state average, with the flagship technology sector recording 3.7% job growth from August 2018 to August 2019 as compared to 1.8% for the state as a whole. The two main challenges to the Bay area economy remain housing affordability and the lack of investment in aging infrastructure that is being further strained by population and job growth. The District’s boundaries encompass a large swath of the Silicon Valley, which continues to be to world’s premier location for the technology industry with a long culture of entrepreneurship and innovation. The District typically derives nearly 90 percent of its total revenues from property taxes, with two-thirds of its general fund property tax revenue from Santa Clara County and one-third from San Mateo County. The real estate market in the both San Mateo and Santa Clara counties continue to demonstrate strong demand in both the residential and commercial sectors. For fiscal year 2020-21, the Santa Clara County Assessor’s Office showed that the assessment roll increased by 6.87 percent, to a total of $551.5 billion. Similarly, San Mateo County reported that the total value of assessed properties increased by 7.02 percent for FY 2020-21 to a record $255.1 billion. Total assessments within the District’s boundaries increased by 9.3 percent for FY 2019-20. Over the past 10 years, the District’s general fund property tax revenues have increased by an annual average of over 9 percent. In a report released for September 2020 by the California Association of Realtors, residential prices showed a year-on-year increase of 20.6 percent in San Mateo County and 14.5 percent in Santa Clara County. While the assessed value continues to grow in both counties, each of the assessor offices remains concerned about the well-publicized affordability issues in the Bay Area. The impact of the recent voter-approved Proposition 19 allowing to keep their existing tax base under certain circumstances, remains to be seen. While the COVID-19 pandemic does not appear to have a negative impact on residential property, commercial development activity and valuations may face headwinds in the coming years as work from home practices become the norm. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, personal income levels as of 2017 (the most recent year for which county data is available) show per capita income of $98,032 for Santa Clara and $113,410 for San Mateo, which are significantly above $60,156 for the State and $51,869 for the nation. In face of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, the District is continuing to develop prudent spending plans, providing it with the financial resources to deal with a potential recession. The aforementioned housing affordability crisis and tight labor market continue to present challenges for hiring and retention of employees. Construction costs for capital projects are still increasing at more rapid pace than general inflation and the construction labor market remains very tight. The District is continuing its to increase its profile with the contractor community with greater outreach. Major Initiatives In the 2019-20 Fiscal year the District’s achieved the completion of major projects and actions including the following: Continued major progress of Phase 2 public access projects at Bear Creek Redwoods Preserve including: •Completion of a new restroom facility, adjustments to the new ADA-accessible loop trail, and feasibility analysis/preliminary design work for further trails. •Completed improvements to Mud Lake by replacing the spillway and outlet, installation of storm water swale improvements and replacement of storm water culverts which will protect Bear Creek Road from flooding and pond habitats. Completed Phase 3 and 4 of the new Oljon Trail connecting Steam Donkey to the Springboard Trail, at El Corte de Madera Preserve. Substantially completed the new 0.6-mile segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail with construction of a new boardwalk and bridge across sensitive bayland wetlands. This closes a critical regional trail gap at Ravenswood Preserve, creating 80 miles of continuous Bay Trail access. Completed the third and final year of a stream gauge and sediment study at El Corte de Madera Creek Preserve to assess the effectiveness or erosion reduction projects with the aim of improving fishery streams. Constructed a bridge and completed revegetation work along the Stevens Creek Nature Trail in Monte Bello Preserve. Continued work to prevent and prepare for wildland fires in response to the increasing fire threat in California. Released a notice of EIR preparation on the developing Wildland Fire Resiliency Program and received approval for the removal of fire-prone eucalyptus trees at Los Trancos Preserve. Made significant progress to bring new Midpen office facilities online for improved administrative functions and delivery of projects and services. This included both the new South Area Field Office and the District’s new Administrative Headquarters. Purchased 542.6 acres of open space lands valued at $12.668 million, including: •The 540-acre Gordon Ridge property as an addition to Tunitas Creek Preserve to support watershed preservation and conservation grazing. •The 1.7-acre Gallaway property as an addition to El Corte de Madera Creek Preserve. •The District also received a gift of 240 acres from the Giusti Family Trust as an addition to •Purisima Creek Redwood Preserve. Relevant Financial Policies Budget Policy The District follow best practices in budgeting, including: assessment of constituent needs, development of long range plans, adherence to budget preparation and adoption procedures, monitoring of performance, and adjustment of budget as required. The District budget is divided into four categories: Operating Budget, Capital Budget, Land and Associated Costs, and Debt Service. The budget is prepared and adopted on a cash-basis, whereas the annual financial statements are prepared on a modified accrual basis. The budget can be amended during the year, in accordance with the Board Budget and Expenditure Policy which states that increases to any of the four budget categories must be approved by the Board. Investment Policy The District’s Investment Policy is adopted annually, in accordance with State law. The policy provides guidance and direction for the prudent investment of District funds to safeguard the principal of invested funds and achieve a return on funds while ensuring the liquidity needs of the District. The ultimate goal is to maximize the efficiency of the District’s cash management system, and to enhance the economic status of the District, while protecting its pooled cash. The investment of funds is governed by the California Government Code Section 53601 et seq., and by California Government Code Section 53630 et seq. Funds on deposit in banks must be federally insured or collateralized in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code Section 53630 et seq. Fund Balance Policy The Board of Directors adopted the Fund Balance Policy in 2014, and updated the Policy in 2016 to achieve the following goals: provide adequate funding to meet the District’s short-term and long-term plans; provide funds for unforeseen expenditures related to emergencies such as natural disasters; strengthen the District’s financial stability against present and future uncertainties such as economic downturns and revenue shortfalls; and maintain an investment-grade bond rating. This policy has been developed with the counsel of the District’s independent auditors, to meet the requirements of GASB 54. The components of the District fund balances are as follows: •Non-Spendable fund balance includes amounts that cannot be spent either because they are not in spendable form, e.g. prepaid insurance, or because of legal or contractual constraints. At all times, the District shall hold fund balance equal to the sum of its non-spendable assets. •Restricted fund balance includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by constitutional provisions, enabling legislation, creditors, or contracts. •Committed fund balance includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by the District Board of Directors. Funds spent from committed funds shall be reimbursed from the general fund within two years. •Assigned fund balance includes amounts that are intended to be used for specific purposes that are neither restricted nor committed. Such amounts may be assigned by the General Manager if authorized by the Board of Directors to make such designations. Projects to be funded by assigned funds require the approval of the General Manager. Funds spent from assigned funds shall be reimbursed from the general fund within two years. •Unassigned fund balance includes amounts within the general fund which have not been classified within the above categories. The Board shall designate the minimum amount of unassigned fund balance which is to be held in reserve in consideration of unanticipated events that could adversely affect the financial condition of the District and potentially jeopardize the continuation of necessary public services. The current minimum unassigned fund balance is 30% of the Budgeted General Fund Tax Revenue. Debt Management Policy The Board of Directors adopted a debt management policy on July 12, 2017. The stated purpose of the Debt Management Policy is to establish the overall parameters for issuing, structuring and administering the debt of the District in compliance with applicable federal and State securities laws. The Debt Management Policy was developed in conjunction with the procedures for Initial and Continuing Disclosure Relating to Bond Issuances, with the latter ensuring that statements or releases of information to the public and investors relating to the finances of the District are complete, true and accurate in all material respects. AWARDS The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement to the District for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019. This was the third year that the District received this prestigious national award. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting. To receive the award, the District must publish a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that is easily readable and efficiently organized, and the contents of the report must conform to program standards and satisfy generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is valid for one year. We believe that our current report continues to conform to the Certificate requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA for another award of the certificate. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report could not have been completed without the efforts and contributions of its staff, as well as other departments across the District. Management also wishes to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Chavan & Associates, the District’s independent auditors who contributed to the preparation of this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Lastly, we wish to acknowledge the District’s Board of Directors for their continued interest in support of the District’s effort to improve and strengthen its financial operations and reporting. Respectfully submitted, /s/Stefan Jaskulak /s/ Ana Maria Ruiz Stefan Jaskulak Ana Maria Ruiz Chief Financial Officer/ General Manager Director of Administrative Services Board of Directors & Management EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT Ana María Ruiz–General Manager Hilary Stevenson–General Counsel Mike Foster–Controller Susanna Chan–Assistant General Manager/Project Planning and Delivery Brian Malone–Assistant General Manager/Visitor and Field Services Stefan Jaskulak–Chief Financial Officer/Director of Administrative Services Mission Statement——————————————————————————––––––––––––—————————————————————————————— The mission of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is to acquire and preserve a regional greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity, protect and restore the natural environment, and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive public enjoyment and education. District Wards Left to right: Zoe Kersteen-Tucker, Curt Riffle, Yoriko Kishimoto, Jed Cyr, Karen Holman, Larry Hassett, Pete Siemens. ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Pete Siemens Ward 1: Cupertino, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Saratoga——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Yoriko Kishimoto–Board Treasurer Ward 2: Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Palo Alto, Stanford, Sunnyvale ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Jed Cyr–Board Secretary Ward 3: Sunnyvale ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Curt Riffle–Board Vice President Ward 4: Los Altos, Mountain View ——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Karen Holman–Board President Ward 5: East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Palo Alto, Stanford——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Larry Hassett Ward 6: Atherton, La Honda, Loma Mar, Menlo Park, Pescadero, Portola Valley, Redwood City, San Gregorio, Woodside——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Ward 7: El Granada, Half Moon Bay, Montara, Moss Beach, Princeton, Redwood City, San Carlos, Woodside——————————————————————————––––––––––––———————————————————————————————— Organizational Chart Midpen At-A-Glance Public Board of Directors ControllerGeneral Counsel General Manager Public Affairs Department Executive Assistant/ Deputy District Clerk District Clerk/Assistant to the General Manager Visitor and Field Services Assistant General Manager Finance and Administrative Services CFO-Director of Administrative Services Project Planning and Delivery Assistant General Manager Visitor Services Department Land and Facilities Department Natural Resources Department Planning Department Real Property Department Engineering and Construction Department Budget and Analysis Department Information Systems and Technology Department Finance Department Human Resources Department Founded in 1972 Nearly 65,000 Acres Preserved 245 Miles of Trails 26 Preserves 182 Full-Time Employees Over 2 Million Visitors Per Year $81.2 Million Budget 770,000 Residents Regional Map Achievement Award Financial Section INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT To the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Los Altos, California Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund for Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the District’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements The District’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the District’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the District, as of June 30, 2020, and the respective changes in financial position and for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, budgetary comparison information for the general fund, schedule of pension plan contributions, schedule of net pension liability proportionate share, schedule of contributions for postemployment benefits, and schedule of changes in net OPEB liability, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Supplementary Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the District’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, budgetary comparison information for the capital projects funds and the debt service fund, the schedule of program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program, and the statistical sections are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, budgetary comparison information for the capital projects funds and the debt service fund, and statistical sections included have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 1, 2020 on our consideration of the District’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the District’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. December 1, 2020 San Jose, California Management’s Discussion and Analysis INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is to present a discussion and analysis of the District’s financial performance during the year ended on June 30, 2020. This report will (1) focus on significant financial issues, (2) provide an overview of the District’s financial activity, (3) identify changes in the District’s financial position, (4) identify any individual fund issues or concerns, and (5) provide descriptions of significant asset and debt activity. This information, presented in conjunction with the annual Basic Financial Statements, is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the District’s operations and financial standing. Required Components of the Annual Financial Report OVERVIEW AND USE OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS This annual report consists of a series of basic financial statements and notes. The statements are organized so the reader can understand the District as an entire operating entity by providing an increasingly detailed look at specific financial activities. The Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities is comprised of the government-wide financial statements and provides information about the activities of the District as a whole, presenting both an aggregate view of the District’s finances as well as a longer-term view of those finances. Fund Financial Statements provide the next level of detail. For governmental funds, these statements reflect how services were financed in the short-term as well as what remains for future spending. The Basic Financial Statements also include notes that explain some of the information in the financial statements and provide more detailed data. The full annual financial report is a product of three separate parts: the basic financial statements, supplementary information, and this section, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis. The three sections together provide a comprehensive financial overview of the District. The basic financials are comprised of two kinds of statements that present financial information from different perspectives, government-wide and fund statements.  Government-wide financial statements, which comprise the first two statements, provide both short-term and long- term information about the District’s overall financial position.  Individual parts of the District, which are reported as fund financial statements, focus on reporting the District’s operations in more detail. These fund financial statements comprise the remaining statements. Management’s Discussion & Analysis Government-Wide Financial Statements Fund Financial Statements Notes to the Financial Statements Basic Financial Statements �� Notes to the financial statements, provide more detailed data and provide explanations to some of the information in the statements. The required supplementary information section provides further explanations and additional support for the financial statements. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENT OF NET POSITION AND THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES The view of the District as a whole looks at all financial transactions and asks the question,  How did we do financially during the fiscal year 1899-2020. The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities answers this question. These statements include all assets and liabilities using the accrual basis of accounting similar to the accounting practices used by most private-sector companies. This basis of accounting takes into account all of the current year revenues and expenses regardless of when cash is received or paid. These two statements report the District s net position and changes in net position. This change in net position is important because it tells the reader that, for the District as a whole, whether the financial position of the District has improved or diminished. The causes of this change may be the result of many factors, some financial, and some not. Non-financial factors include the District s property tax base, current property tax laws in California restricting revenue growth, facility conditions and other factors. In the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities, the District reports governmental activities which reflect the District s programs and services. The District does not have any business type activities. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS As the overall economy continued to grow throughout the Silicon Valley, the District witnessed further strong growth in the assessed valuation of both secured and unsecured property within its boundaries. The 2019-20 assessed valuation reports released in August 2019 showed District-wide assessed values increasing by 9.3% (6.3% in Santa Clara and 16.7% in San Mateo). The District received 67% of its tax revenue from Santa Clara County and 33% from San Mateo County. Other financial highlights included: " Tax revenue related to the GO bonds amounted to $5.2 million. " Purchased $23.2 million in land and associated structures funded through cash payments and grants. " The District recorded deferred outflows of resources of $13,272,759 and deferred inflows of resources of $1,786,447 as required by GASB 68 and GASB 75 for pension and other postemployment benefit accounting and reporting. Deferred outflows of resources are technically not assets but increase the Statement of Net Position similar to an asset and deferred inflows of resources are technically not liabilities but decrease the Statement of Net Position similar to liabilities. See Note 1 in the notes to financial statements for a definition. " The District s Section 115 irrevocable trust for pension liabilities held with the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) has a value of $4,063,202 at year end. " Fully funded the District s other postemployment benefits plan according to the actuarially determined contribution for current year, as noted in the schedule of contribution for postemployment benefits. The assets of the District exceeded liabilities at the close of the 2020 fiscal year by $392 million. Of this total net position, $371 million, or 95%, was the District s net investment in capital assets (capital assets net of related debt). REPORTING THE DISTRICT’S MOST SIGNIFICANT FUNDS Fund Financial Statements Fund financial reports provide detailed information about the District’s major funds. The District uses one operating fund, the General Fund, to account for a multitude of financial transactions, two capital project funds to account for capital projects, and one debt service fund to account for debt service payments. Governmental Funds The General Fund is a governmental fund type and is reported using an accounting method called modified accrual accounting, which measures cash and all other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash. The governmental fund statements provide a detailed short-term view of the District’s general government operations and the basic services it provides. Governmental fund information helps determine whether there are more or fewer financial resources that can be spent in the future to finance educational programs. The relationship (or differences) between governmental activities (reported in the Statement of Net position and the Statement of Activities) and governmental funds is reconciled in the financial statements. THE DISTRICT AS A WHOLE Recall that the Statement of Net Position provides the perspective of the District as a whole. Table 1 provides a summary of the District’s net position as compared to last period: Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Assets Current Assets 105,437,703$ 108,643,304$ (3,205,601)$ -2.95% Other Noncurrent Assets 488,551 562,532 (73,981) -13.15% Capital Assets 526,101,317 504,559,409 21,541,908 4.27% Total Assets 632,027,571$ 613,765,245$ 18,262,326$ 2.98% Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 13,272,759$ 14,826,493$ (1,553,734)$ -10.48% Liabilities Current Liabilities 16,110,600$ 16,695,948$ (585,348)$ -3.51% Noncurrent Liabilities 235,321,577 243,049,767 (7,728,190) -3.18% Total Liabilities 251,432,177$ 259,745,715$ (8,313,538)$ -3.20% Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 1,786,447$ 1,471,865$ 314,582$ 21.37% Net Position Net Investment in Capital Assets 371,186,303$ 351,151,768$ 20,034,535$ 5.71% Restricted 6,277,961 8,207,641 (1,929,680) -23.51% Unrestricted 14,617,442 8,014,749 6,602,693 82.38% Total Net Position 392,081,706$ 367,374,158$ 24,707,548$ 6.73% Table 1 - Summary of Statement of Net Position Total net position increased by $24.7 million, as revenues exceeded expenses. Current assets decreased mainly due to the use of cash and investments to pay for capital outlay and retirement of long-term debt. Capital assets increased by $21.5 million mostly from the purchase of land and related infrastructure. Principal payments on outstanding bonds and promissory notes were the main reason for the $7.7 million decrease in noncurrent liabilities. Table 2 shows the changes in net position for 2020 as compared to period 1899. Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Revenues Program revenues 5,948,662$ 3,442,075$ 2,506,587$ 72.82% General revenues: Property taxes 57,250,664 54,395,054 2,855,610 5.25% Investment earnings 2,307,193 3,627,639 (1,320,446) -36.40% Miscellaneous 1,556,894 1,874,272 (317,378) -16.93% Total Revenues 67,063,413 63,339,040 3,724,373 5.88% Program Expenses Land preservation 32,482,326 34,304,215 (1,821,889) -5.31% Interest 9,873,539 10,448,784 (575,245) -5.51% Total Expenses 42,355,865 44,752,999 (2,397,134) -5.36% Change in Net Position 24,707,548 18,586,041 6,121,507 32.94% Beginning Net Position 367,374,158 348,788,117 18,586,041 5.33% Ending Net Position 392,081,706$ 367,374,158$ 24,707,548$ 6.73% Table 2 - Summary of Changes in Net Position There was an increase in change in net position by $24.7 million, as revenues exceeded expenses. THE DISTRICT’S FUND BALANCE Table 3 provides an analysis of the District’s fund balances and the total change in fund balances from the prior year. Measure AA Debt General Capital GF Capital Service Percentage Fund Projects Fund Projects Fund Fund Total 2019 Change Nonspendable for prepaid expenditure 205,929$ -$ -$ -$ 205,929$ 185,984$ 11% Restricted for debt service - - - 4,813,811 4,813,811 6,775,924 -29% Restricted for Measure AA Projects - 32,301,379 - - 32,301,379 37,944,253 -15% Restricted for Hawthorn maintenance 1,464,150 - - - 1,464,150 1,431,717 2% Restricted for capital projects - - 6,843,580 - 6,843,580 8,254,539 -17% Restricted for pension 4,063,202 - - - 4,063,202 2,531,030 61% Committed for infrastructure 18,618,465 - - - 18,618,465 17,688,465 5% Committed for equipment replacement 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 0% Committed for capital maintenance 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 0% Committed for future acquisitions and capital projects 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 3,000,000 100% Committed for promissory note 900,000 - - - 900,000 600,000 50% Assigned for ongoing projects 710,000 - - - 710,000 1,400,000 -49% Unassigned 16,978,717 - - - 16,978,717 16,515,392 3% Total Fund Balance 56,940,463$ 32,301,379$ 6,843,580$ 4,813,811$ 100,899,233$ 104,327,304$ -3% Table 3 - Summary of Fund Balance (All Governmental Funds) 2020 In accordance with the District’s thirty-year strategic plan, the Board of Directors committed an additional $3 million in 2020 for future acquisitions and capital projects. This was an increase to its existing reserves for infrastructure, equipment replacement, and capital maintenance. See Note 1 in the notes to the basic financial statements of the audit report for a description of each commitment. The fund balances restricted for debt service, measure AA projects, and capital projects decreased by 29%, 15%, and 17%, respectively due to District expended more out of these funds during the year ended June 30, 2020. The fund balance restricted for pension increased by 61% as District reserved more for future pension payments. The fund balance committed for promissory notes increased by 50% as District reserved more for future promissory note payments. The fund balance assigned for ongoing projects decreased by 49% since District expended more out of this fund for ongoing projects during the year ended June 30, 2020. GENERAL FUND BUDGETING HIGHLIGHTS The District’s budget is prepared according to California law and in the modified accrual basis of accounting. During the course of 2020, the District revised its General Fund budget, which resulted in an decrease in budgeted expenditures of $1.5 million from the original to final budget. The revenue was revised from $56.0 million to $55.9 million due to decrease in grant revenue. A summary of the original and final budget is presented below: Percent Original Budget Final Budget Change Change Revenues Property taxes 51,863,000$ 51,883,000$ 20,000$ 0.04% Grant revenues 488,300 388,300 (100,000) -20.48% Property management 1,078,000 1,078,000 - 0.00% Investment earnings 2,099,878 2,099,878 - 0.00% Other revenues 479,157 479,157 - 0.00% Total Revenues 56,008,335 55,928,335 (80,000) -0.14% Expenditures Salaries and employee benefits 25,349,838 25,460,977 111,139 0.44% Services and supplies 11,746,210 10,160,745 (1,585,465) -15.60% Capital outlay 48,000 - (48,000) -100.00% Total Expenses 37,144,048 35,621,722 (1,522,326) -4.27% Net Change in Fund Balance 18,864,287$ 20,306,613$ 1,442,326$ 7.65% Table 4 - Summary of Original to Final Budgets CAPITAL ASSETS Table 5 shows 2020 capital asset balances as compared to 1899. Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Land 450,098,759$ 437,763,645$ 12,335,114$ 2.82% Construction-in-Progress 17,313,507 16,193,374 1,120,133 6.92% Structure and Improvements 19,118,187 18,059,730 1,058,457 5.86% Infrastructure 37,093,321 29,542,214 7,551,107 25.56% Equipment 1,092,107 1,113,614 (21,507) -1.93% Vehicles 1,385,436 1,886,832 (501,396) -26.57% Total Capital Assets - Net 526,101,317$ 504,559,409$ 21,541,908$ 4.27% Table 5 - Summary of Capital Assets Net of Depreciation Additional detail and information on capital asset activity is described in the notes to the financial statements, note 5. LONG TERM LIABILITIES Table 6 summarizes the changes in long-term liabilities from 2020 to 1899. Percentage 2020 2019 Change Change Promissory Notes 37,938,606$ 38,899,934$ (961,328)$ -2.47% Bonds 190,555,234 199,505,576 (8,950,342) -4.49% Net Pension Liability 11,828,627 10,412,478 1,416,149 13.60% Net OPEB Liability 1,500,844 1,862,277 (361,433) -19.41% Compensated Absences 2,777,151 2,368,387 408,764 17.26% Total Long-term Liabilities 244,600,462$ 253,048,652$ (8,448,190)$ -3.34% Table 6 - Summary of Long-term Liabilities Additional detail and information on long-term liabilities activity is described in the notes to the financial statements, note 6. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET The Board of Directors adopted the District’s budget for fiscal year 2020-21 on June 24, 2020. This budget assumes $65.2 million in revenues and a growth in general fund property tax income of 3.8% over the prior year’s adopted budget. This budget funds $27.7 million of capital spending, of which $10.2 million is expected to qualify for reimbursement from Measure AA GO bond funds. General Fund operating expenditures are budgeted at $35.0 million, a 7.0% decrease over the prior year’s adopted budget. Debt service is budgeted at $16.6 million, with $6.0 million related to the Measure AA general obligation bonds. If all revenues, expenditures (including debt service) occur as budgeted, the District’s overall cash balances would increase by approximately $0.8 million. CONTACTING THE DISTRICT’S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, parents, participants, investors and creditors with a general overview of the District’s finances and to demonstrate the District’s accountability for the money it receives. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Administrative Office, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, 330 Distel Circle, Los Altos, California 94022. Page Intentionally Left Blank Basic Financial Statements Page Intentionally Left Blank GOVERNMENT-WIDE STATEMENTS Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities summarize the entire District’s financial activities and financial position.They are prepared on the same basis as is used by most businesses,which means they include all the District’s assets and all its liabilities,as well as all its revenues and expenses.This is known as the full accrual basis.The effect of all of the District’s transactions is taken into account,regardless of whether or when cash changes hands, but all material internal transactions between District funds have been eliminated. The Statement of Net Position reports the difference between the District’s total assets and the District’s total liabilities,including all the District’s capital assets and all its long-term debt.The Statement of Net Position presents information in a way that focuses the reader on the composition of the District’s net position,by subtracting total liabilities from total assets. The Statement of Net Position summarizes the financial position of all of the District’s Governmental Activities in a single column.The District’s Governmental Activities include the activities of its General Fund,along with all its Special Revenue Funds, Capital Projects Funds, and Debt Service Funds. The Statement of Activities reports increases and decreases in the District’s net position.It is also prepared on the full accrual basis,which means it includes all the District’s revenues and all its expenses,regardless of when cash changes hands.This differs from the “modified accrual”basis used in the Fund financial statements,which reflect only current assets, current liabilities, available revenues and measurable expenditures. The Statement of Activities presents the District’s expenses first,listed by program.Program revenues –that is, revenues which are generated directly by these programs -are then deducted from program expenses to arrive at the net expense of each governmental program.The District’s general revenues are then listed in the Governmental Activities and the Change in Net Position is computed and reconciled with the Statement of Net Position. Both these Statements include the financial activities of the District and the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority.This entity is legally separate but is a component unit of the District because it is controlled by the District, which is financially accountable for the Authority’s activities. Assets Current assets: Cash and investments 104,639,305$ Accounts receivable: Interest 214,097 Other 362,854 Taxes receivable 221 Other current assets 221,226 Total current assets 105,437,703 Noncurrent assets: Notes receivable 74,509 Unamortized issuance costs 414,042 Non-depreciable capital assets 467,412,266 Capital assets, net of depreciation 58,689,051 Total noncurrent assets 526,589,868 Total Assets 632,027,571$ Deferred Outflows of Resources OPEB adjustments 638,539$ Pension adjustments 4,083,643 Deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt 8,550,577 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 13,272,759$ Liabilities Current liabilities: Accounts payable 2,616,408$ Deposits payable 177,135 Payroll and other liabilities 1,744,926 Accrued interest 2,293,246 Current portion of long-term liabilities 9,278,885 Total current liabilities 16,110,600 Noncurrent liabilities: Long-term liabilities - net of current portion 235,321,577 Total Liabilities 251,432,177$ Deferred Inflows of Resources OPEB adjustments 215,779$ Pension adjustments 1,570,668 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 1,786,447$ Net Position Net investment in capital assets 371,186,303$ Restricted for: Debt service 4,813,811 Hawthorne maintenance 1,464,150 Total restricted 6,277,961 Unrestricted 14,617,442 Total Net Position 392,081,706$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Net Position June 30, 2020 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Net (Expense) Capital Revenue and Charges for Grants and Changes in Expenses Services Contributions Net Position Governmental activities: Land preservation 32,482,326$ 2,655,179$ 3,293,483$ (26,533,664)$ Interest and fiscal charges 9,873,539 - - (9,873,539) Total governmental activities 42,355,865$ 2,655,179$ 3,293,483$ (36,407,203) General revenues and special item: Property taxes 57,250,664 Investment earnings 2,307,193 Other revenues 1,565,738 Special item - loss on disposal of capital assets (8,844) Total general revenues and special item 61,114,751 Change in net position 24,707,548 Net position beginning 367,374,158 Net position ending 392,081,706$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Activities For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Program Revenues The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Page Intentionally Left Blank Fund Title Fund Description General Fund The fund is the general operating fund of the District. It is used to account for all financial resources. The major revenue sources for this fund are property taxes, grant revenues and interest income. Expenditures are made for land preservation and other operating expenditures. Measure AA Capital Projects Fund This fund is used to account for resources from bond proceeds and expenditures for capital projects related to the Measure AA GO Bond. GF Capital Projects Fund This fund is used to account for expenditures for capital projects not related to any other capital projects funds. Debt Service Fund This fund is used to account for accumulation of resources for, and the payment of long-term debt principal, interest and related costs. Resources are provided by General Fund transfers and interest income on unspent funds. FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The funds described below were determined to be Major Funds by the District in fiscal year 2020. Measure AA GF Capital Debt Total General Capital Projects Service Governmental Fund Projects Fund Fund Fund Funds Assets Cash and investments 59,060,612$ 33,044,310$ 7,720,572$ 4,813,811$ 104,639,305$ Receivables: Interest 214,097 - - - 214,097 Other 362,854 - - - 362,854 Taxes receivable 221 - - - 221 Other current assets 221,226 - - - 221,226 Due from other funds 9,308,458 9,702,604 - - 19,011,062 Notes receivable 74,509 - - - 74,509 Total Assets 69,241,977$ 42,746,914$ 7,720,572$ 4,813,811$ 124,523,274$ Liabilities Liabilities: Accounts payable 913,498$ 1,137,077$ 565,833$ -$ 2,616,408$ Deposits payable 177,135 - - - 177,135 Due to other funds 9,391,445 9,308,458 311,159 - 19,011,062 Payroll and other liabilities 1,744,926 - - - 1,744,926 Total Liabilities 12,227,004 10,445,535 876,992 - 23,549,531 Deferred Inflows of Resources Unavailable revenues 74,510 - - - 74,510 Fund Balance Nonspendable: Prepaid expenditures 205,929 - - - 205,929 Restricted for: Debt service - - - 4,813,811 4,813,811 Measure AA capital projects - 32,301,379 - - 32,301,379 Hawthorn maintenance 1,464,150 - - - 1,464,150 Capital projects - - 6,843,580 - 6,843,580 Pension 4,063,202 - - - 4,063,202 Committed for: Infrastructure 18,618,465 - - - 18,618,465 Equipment replacement 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 Capital maintenance 5,000,000 - - - 5,000,000 Future acquisitions and capital projects 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 Promissory note 900,000 - - - 900,000 Assigned for: Ongoing Projects 710,000 - - - 710,000 Unassigned 16,978,717 - - - 16,978,717 Total Fund Balance 56,940,463 32,301,379 6,843,580 4,813,811 100,899,233 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance 69,241,977$ 42,746,914$ 7,720,572$ 4,813,811$ 124,523,274$ Balance Sheet Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District June 30, 2020 Governmental Funds The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Total fund balance - governmental funds 100,899,233$ Amounts reported in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported as assets in governmental funds. Capital assets at cost 549,421,628$ Accumulated depreciation (23,320,311) 526,101,317 Principal on notes receivables are recorded as unearned revenue in the funds, which upon collection is a current financial resource. In the government-wide financial statements, repayment of the principal amount does not generate revenue in the statement of activities; therefore, unearned revenue is not recorded.74,510 The difference between OPEB plan assumptions and estimates versus actuals are not included in the plan's actuarial study until the next fiscal year and are reported as deferred outflows or inflows of resources in the statement of net position.422,760 The difference between pension plan assumptions and estimates versus actuals are not included in the plan's actuarial study until the next fiscal year and are reported as deferred outflows or inflows of resources in the statement of net position.2,512,975 Interest payable on long-term debt does not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, is not reported in the governmental funds.(2,293,246) Discounts and premiums related to bond issues are recorded as other financing sources and uses in the fund financial statements but are recorded as assets or liabilities and amortized over the life of the bond in the statement of net position: Premium 24,263,367$ Issuance cost (414,042) (23,849,325) Deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt is recorded in the Statement of Net Position as a deferred outflow of resources and amortized on a straight line basis over the original life of the defeased bond.8,550,577 Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current year and therefore are not reported as liabilities in the funds. Long-term liabilities at year-end consists of: Bonds 171,260,000$ Net pension liability 11,828,627 Promissory notes 32,970,473 Compensated absences 2,777,151 Net OPEB liability 1,500,844 (220,337,095) Total net position - governmental activities 392,081,706$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position June 30, 2020 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Measure AA GF Capital Debt Total General Capital Projects Service Governmental Fund Projects Fund Fund Fund Funds Revenues: Property taxes 52,024,342$ -$ -$ 5,226,322$ 57,250,664$ Grant income 31,396 1,498,087 1,764,000 - 3,293,483 Property management 2,655,179 - - - 2,655,179 Investment earnings 1,014,726 1,007,460 216,363 88,317 2,326,866 Other revenues 261,702 - - - 261,702 Total revenues 55,987,345 2,505,547 1,980,363 5,314,639 65,787,894 Expenditures: Current: Land preservation: Salaries and employee benefits 23,240,060 375,893 - - 23,615,953 Services and supplies 7,828,976 - - - 7,828,976 Capital outlay - 7,641,519 12,459,954 - 20,101,473 Debt service: Principal - - - 9,115,000 9,115,000 Interest - - - 8,554,563 8,554,563 Total expenditures 31,069,036 8,017,412 12,459,954 17,669,563 69,215,965 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 24,918,309 (5,511,865) (10,479,591) (12,354,924) (3,428,071) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 889,920 - 9,827,543 10,392,811 21,110,274 Transfers out (20,220,354) - (889,920) - (21,110,274) Total other financing sources (uses) (19,330,434) - 8,937,623 10,392,811 - Net changes in fund balance 5,587,875 (5,511,865) (1,541,968) (1,962,113) (3,428,071) Fund balance beginning 51,352,588 37,944,253 8,254,539 6,775,924 104,327,304 Prior period adjustment - (131,009) 131,009 - - Fund balance beginning - as adjusted 51,352,588 37,813,244 8,385,548 6,775,924 104,327,304 Fund balance ending 56,940,463$ 32,301,379$ 6,843,580$ 4,813,811$ 100,899,233$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Governmental Funds For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Total net change in fund balance - governmental funds (3,428,071)$ Capital outlays are reported in governmental funds as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. Expenditures capitalized as capital assets 24,674,628$ Depreciation expense (3,123,880) Loss on disposal of capital asset (8,844) 21,541,904 Repayment of notes receivable is reported as revenue in the governmental funds because financial resources were received and available during the fiscal year. In the statement of net position, the payment reduces the principal balance of notes receivable and does not generate revenue in the statement of activities.(19,673) Accreted interest on capital appreciation bonds is not recorded in the governmental funds but is required to be recorded under the accrual basis of accounting in the government wide financial statements.(507,362) The governmental funds report debt proceeds as an other financing source, while repayment of debt principal is reported as an expenditure. Interest is recognized as an expenditure in the governmental funds when it is due. The net effect of these differences in the treatment of long-term debt and related items is as follows: Repayment of bond principal 7,830,000 Repayment of promissory notes principal 1,285,000 9,115,000 Deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt is amortized over the life of the debt in the statement of activities. Amortization expense is not reported in the governmental funds.(845,123) Prepaid issuance costs, discounts and premiums related to bond issues are recorded as other financing sources and uses in the fund financial statements but are recorded as assets or liabilities and amortized over the life of the bond in the statement of net position: Amortization of issuance costs and premiums - net 1,249,724 In the Statement of Activities, compensated absences are measured by the amount earned during the year. In governmental funds, however, expenditures for those items are measured by the amount of financial resources used (essentially the amounts paid). This year, vacation earned exceeded the amounts used.(408,764) In governmental funds, actual contributions to pension and OPEB plans are reported as expenditures in the year incurred. However, in the government-wide statement of activities, only the current year pension and OPEB expense as noted in the plans' valuation reports is reported as an expense, as adjusted for deferred inflows and outflows of resources.(2,077,906) Interest on long-term debt in the Statement of Activities differs from the amount reported in the governmental funds because interest is recognized as an expenditure in the funds when it is due and thus requires the use of current financial resources. In the Statement of Activities, however, interest expense is recognized as the interest accrues, regardless of when it is due.87,819 Change in net position of governmental activities 24,707,548$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. Page Intentionally Left Blank Notes to Financial Statements NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A. General The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District) was formed in 1972 to acquire and preserve public open space land in northern and western portions of Santa Clara County. In June 1976, the southern and eastern portions of San Mateo County were annexed to the District. The District annexed a small portion of the northern tip of Santa Cruz County in 1992. In September 2004, the District completed the Coastside Protection Program, which extended the District boundaries to the Pacific Ocean in San Mateo County, from the southern borders of Pacifica to the San Mateo/Santa Cruz County line. B. Accounting Principles The accounting policies of the District conform to generally accepted accounting principles as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). C. Reporting Entity As required by generally accepted accounting principles, these basic financial statements present the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District and its component unit. The component unit discussed in the following paragraph is included in the District's reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the District. Blended Component Unit. The District and the County of Santa Clara entered into a joint exercise of powers agreement dated May 1, 1996, creating the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Financing Authority (the Authority), pursuant to the California Government Code. The District is financially accountable for the Authority, as it appoints a voting majority of the governing board; is able to impose its will in the Authority; and the Authority provides specific financial benefits to, and imposes specific financial burdens on, the District. The Authority was formed for the sole purpose of providing financing assistance to the District to fund the acquisition of land to preserve and use as open space. As such, the Authority is an integral part of the District, and accordingly, all of the Authority's activity is blended within the accompanying debt service fund. D. Basis of Presentation Government-wide Financial Statements: The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities) report information on all of the activities of the District. The Statement of Net Position reports all assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and net position. The government-wide statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. This approach differs from the manner in which governmental fund financial statements are prepared. Governmental fund financial statements, therefore, include the reconciliation with brief explanations to better identify the relationship between the government wide statements and the statements for the governmental funds. The government-wide statement of activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each function or program of the District’s governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a service, program, or department and are therefore clearly identifiable to a particular function. The District does not allocate indirect expenses to functions in the statement of activities. Program revenues include charges paid by the recipients of goods or services offered by a program, as well as grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular program. Revenues that are not classified as program revenues are presented as general revenues of the District, with certain exceptions. The comparison of direct expenses with program revenues identifies the extent to which each governmental function is self-financing or draws from the general revenues of the District. Fund Financial Statements: Fund financial statements report detailed information about the District. The accounting and financial treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. All governmental funds are accounted for using a flow of current financial resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, only current assets, deferred outflows, current liabilities and deferred inflows are generally included on the balance sheet. The Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance for these funds present increases (i.e., revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (i.e., expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. E. Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Government-wide financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Governmental funds use the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues - Exchange and Non-exchange Transactions: Revenue resulting from exchange transactions, in which each party gives and receives essentially equal value, is recorded under the accrual basis when the exchange takes place. On a modified accrual basis, revenue is recorded in the fiscal period in which the resources are measurable and become available. “Available” means the resources will be collected within the current fiscal period or are expected to be collected soon enough thereafter to be used to pay liabilities of the current fiscal period. For the District, “available” means collectible within the current period or within 90 days after period-end. Non-exchange transactions, in which the District receives value without directly giving equal value in return, include property taxes, grants, and entitlements. Under the accrual basis, revenue from property taxes is recognized in the fiscal period for which the taxes are levied. Revenue from grants and entitlements is recognized in the fiscal period in which all eligibility requirements have been satisfied. Eligibility requirements include timing requirements, which specify the period when the resources are to be used or the fiscal period when use is first permitted; matching requirements, in which the District must provide local resources to be used for a specific purpose; and expenditure requirements, in which the resources are provided to the District on a reimbursement basis. Under the modified accrual basis, revenue from non-exchange transactions must also be available before it can be recognized. Deferred Outflows/Deferred Inflows: A deferred outflow of resources is defined as a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expenses/expenditure) until then. A deferred inflow of resources is defined as an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenues) until that time. When applicable, unamortized portions of the gain and loss on refunding debt are reported as deferred inflows and deferred outflows of resources, respectively. Deferred outflows and inflows of resources are reported for the changes related to benefit plans. In addition, when an asset is recorded in governmental fund financial statements but the revenue is not available, a deferred inflow of resources is reported until such time as the revenue becomes available. Unearned Revenue: Unearned revenue arises when assets (such as cash) are received before revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Grants and entitlements received before eligibility requirements (such as qualified expenditures) are met are recorded as liabilities from unearned revenue. Unavailable Revenue: In the governmental fund financial statements, receivables associated with non-exchange transactions that will not be collected within the availability period have been recorded as deferred inflows of resources as unavailable revenue. Expenses/Expenditures: On the accrual basis of accounting, expenses are recognized at the time a liability is incurred. On the modified accrual basis of accounting, expenditures are generally recognized in the accounting period in which the related fund liability is incurred, as under the accrual basis of accounting. However, under the modified accrual basis of accounting, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. Allocations of cost, such as depreciation and amortization, are not recognized in the governmental funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the District’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. F. Fund Accounting The accounts of the District are organized into four funds with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise of the District’s assets, deferred outflows, liabilities, deferred inflows, fund balance, revenues, and expenditures. The District resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purpose for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Major funds are defined as funds that have either assets, liabilities, revenues or expenditures/expenses equal to ten percent of their fund-type total and five percent of the grand total. The General Fund is always a major fund. The District may also select other funds it believes should be presented as major funds. The District reported all of its funds as major governmental funds in the accompanying financial statements: General Fund. The General Fund is the general operating fund of the District. It is used to account for all financial resources. The major revenue sources for this fund are property taxes, grant revenues and interest income. Expenditures are made for land preservation and other operating expenditures. Measure AA Capital Projects Fund. The Measure AA Capital Projects Fund is used to account for resources from bond proceeds and expenditures for capital projects related to the Measure AA GO Bond. GF Capital Projects Fund. GF Capital Projects Fund is used to account for expenditures for capital projects not related to any other capital projects funds. Debt Service Fund. The Debt Service Fund is used to account for accumulation of resources for, and the payment of long-term debt principal, interest and related costs. Resources are provided by tax revenue, General Fund transfers, and interest income on unspent funds. G. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The District's Board of Directors adopts an annual operating budget for the District by major fund, on or before June 30, for the ensuing fiscal period. The Board of Directors may amend the budget by resolution during the fiscal period. The legal level of control, the level at which expenditures may not legally exceed the budget, is at the category level. H. Assets, Liabilities, and Equity 1. Cash and Cash Equivalents The District’s cash deposits are considered to be cash on hand and cash in banks. Cash and Cash Equivalents are generally considered short-term, highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the purchase date. 2. Investments Investments are recorded at fair value in accordance with GASB Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. Accordingly, the change in fair value of investments is recognized as an increase or decrease to investment assets and investment income. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. In determining this amount, three valuation techniques are available: • Market approach - This approach uses prices generated for identical or similar assets or liabilities. The most common example is an investment in a public security traded in an active exchange such as the NYSE. • Cost approach - This technique determines the amount required to replace the current asset. This approach may be ideal for valuing donations of capital assets or historical treasures. " Income approach - This approach converts future amounts (such as cash flows) into a current discounted amount. Each of these valuation techniques requires inputs to calculate a fair value. Observable inputs have been maximized in fair value measures, and unobservable inputs have been minimized. 3. Prepaid Expenditures The District has the option of reporting expenditures in governmental funds for prepaid items either when purchased or during the benefiting period. The District has chosen to report the expenditure during the benefiting period. 4. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include land, buildings and improvements, furniture, equipment, and construction in progress, are reported in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are valued at cost when historical records are available and at an estimated historical cost when no historical records exist. Donated capital assets are valued at their acquisition value at the time of acquisition plus ancillary charges, if any. Donated works of art and similar items and capital assets received in service concession arrangements are reported at acquisition value. The District utilizes a capitalization threshold of $1 for land, $25,000 for equipment, fixtures and vehicles, $50,000 for infrastructure, improvements, buildings and structures. Projects under construction are recorded at cost as construction in progress and transferred to the appropriate asset account when substantially complete. Costs of major improvements and rehabilitation of buildings are capitalized. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense when incurred. Equipment disposed of, or no longer required for its existing use, is removed from the records at actual or estimated historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation. All capital assets, except land and construction in progress, are depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Years Structures/Improvements 50 Public Access Infrastructure 20 - 50 Equipment/Fixtures 5 - 20 Vehicles 5 Software 5 - 10 5. Compensated Absences In accordance with the District's memorandum of understanding with various employee groups, employees accrue fifteen days of vacation during the first nine years of service, twenty days between service years 10 and fourteen, twenty-one days between service years fifteen and nineteen, twenty-three days between service years twenty and twenty-four, and twenty-five days after twenty-five years of service. An employee may accumulate vacation time earned to a maximum of two times the amount of his/her annual vacation accrual. Full-time employees accrue twelve days of sick leave: annually from the date of employment. An employee may accumulate sick leave time earned on an unlimited basis. Upon resignation, separation from service, or retirement from District employment, workers in good standing with ten or more years of District employment shall receive a cash payment of the equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave as follows: Percentage of equivalent cash value of accrued Years of Employment sick leave 15-20 20% 16-20 25% 21 or more 30% An employee hired before June 30, 2006, who retires from the District shall receive a cash payment of the percentage of equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave based on years of employment as described above, and apply the remainder of the equivalent cash value toward his/her cost of retiree medical plan premiums and/or other qualified medical expenses. Upon retirement, the amount qualified and designated for retiree medical costs shall be deposited in the Retiree Health Savings (RHS) plan, set up by the District. The cost for maintaining the retiree's RHS account and the annual fee for the reimbursement process of qualified medical expenses will be paid for by the retiree. An employee hired on or after July 1, 2006, who retires from the District may elect to receive only a cash payment of the percentage of equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave based on years of employment as described above. In all cases the equivalent cash value of accrued sick leave will be based on current rate of pay as of the date of separation from District employment. The District accrues for all salary-related items in the government-wide statements for which they are liable to make a payment directly and incrementally associated with payments made for compensated absences on termination. Compensated absences are liquidated by the fund that has recorded the related liability. The long-term portion of governmental activities compensated absences is liquidated primarily by the General Fund. 6. Long-Term/Noncurrent Obligations In the government-wide financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the Statement of Net Position. 7. Debt Discount and Issuance Costs Debt discounts, premiums, and prepaid issuance costs are capitalized as an offset to long-term debt and amortized using the straight line method over the life of the related debt. Issuance costs for the District's tax-exempt commercial paper short-term borrowings are expensed as incurred. 8.Fund Balance Classifications In accordance with Government Accounting Standards Board 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, the District classifies governmental fund balances as follows: •Nonspendable fund balance includes amounts that cannot be spent either because it is not in spendable form or because of legal or contractual constraints. •Restricted fund balance includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by providers, such as creditors or amounts constrained due to constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. •Committed fund balances includes amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by the government through formal action of the highest level of decision making authority and does not lapse at period-end. Committed fund balances were imposed by the District’s Board of Directors resolution. Any changes to committed fund balance requires the approval of two-thirds of the Board. Committed fund balances were imposed by the District’s Board of Directors as follows: o Infrastructure: $18.6 million; projected minimum requirement for expansion of field and office facilities over the next five years. o Equipment Replacement: $3 million; projected requirement for equipment and vehicle replacement based on the amount of accumulated depreciation recorded on capital assets in service. o Capital maintenance: $5 million; amounts com44mitted to reserve for future capital repairs and maintenance. o Future acquisitions and capital projects: $6 million; amounts committed to reserve for future capital acquisitions and projects. o Promissory Note: $0.9 million; amounts committed to payment of promissory note. •Assigned fund balance includes amounts that are intended to be used for specific purposes that are neither considered restricted or committed. Fund balance may be assigned by the General Manager, pursuant to Board Policy 3.07, if authorized by the Board of Directors to make such designations. At June 30, 2020, the District had assigned $710,000 in fund balance for ongoing projects. •Unassigned fund balance includes positive amounts within the general fund which has not been classified within the above-mentioned categories and negative fund balances in other governmental funds. The District uses restricted/committed amounts to be spent first when both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available unless there are legal documents/contracts that prohibit doing this, such as a grant agreement requiring dollar for dollar spending. Additionally, the District would first use committed, then assigned, and lastly unassigned amounts of unrestricted fund balance when expenditures are made. 9. Net Position Net position represents the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Net investment in capital assets consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balances of any borrowings used for the acquisition, construction or improvement of those assets. In addition, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets or related debt also are included in the net investment in capital assets component of net position. Net position is reported as restricted when there are limitations imposed on its use either through the enabling legislation adopted by the District or through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, laws or regulations of other governments. The District applies restricted resources when an expense is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted net position is available. Unrestricted net position reflect amounts that are not subject to any donor-imposed restrictions. This class also includes restricted contributions whose donor-imposed restrictions were met during the fiscal period. A deficit unrestricted net position may result when significant cash balances restricted for capital projects exist. Once the projects are completed, the restriction on these assets are released and converted to capital assets. 10. Pension For purposes of measuring the net pension liability and deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the District’s California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) plan and additions to/deductions from the plan’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by CalPERS. For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions - an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 (GASB Statement No. 68) requires that the reported results pertain to liability and asset information within certain defined timeframes. For this report, the following time frames were used: Valuation Date (VD) ....................................... June 30, 2018 Measurement Date (MD) ................................ June 30, 2019 Measurement Period (MP) .............................. July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 11. Other Postemployment Benefits Oher Than Pensions (OPEB) For purposes of measuring the net OPEB liability, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, and OPEB expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the District’s Retiree Benefits Plan (the OPEB Plan) and additions to/deductions are based on the when they are due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms for the measurement period included in the OPEB plan’s actuarial reports. Investments are reported at fair value, except for money market investments and participating interest-earning investment contracts that have a maturity at the time of purchase of one year or less, which are reported at cost. Valuation Date June 30, 2019 Measurement Date June 30, 2019 Measurement Period July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 12. Property Taxes The District receives property tax revenue from Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties (the Counties). The Counties are responsible for assessing, collecting and distributing property taxes in accordance with state law. Secured property taxes are recorded as revenue when apportioned, in the fiscal period of the levy. The counties apportion secured property tax revenue in accordance with the alternate method of distribution prescribed by Section 4705 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. This alternate method provides for crediting each applicable fund with its total secured taxes upon completion of the secured tax roll - approximately October 1 of each year. Taxes are levied annually on July 1st, and one-half are due by November 1st and one- half by February 1st. Taxes are delinquent after December 10th and April 10th, respectively. Supplemental property taxes are levied on a pro-rata basis when changes in assessed valuation occur due to the completion of construction or sales transactions. Liens on real property are established on January 15th for the ensuing fiscal period. On June 30, 1993, the Board of Supervisors adopted the "Teeter" method of property tax allocation. This method allocates property taxes based on the total property tax billed. At year- end, the Counties advances cash to each taxing jurisdiction equal to its current year delinquent taxes. Once the delinquent taxes are collected, the revenue from penalties and interest remains with each County and is used to pay the interest cost of borrowing the cash used for the advances. 13. Accounting Estimates The presentation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates. I. Upcoming Accounting and Reporting Changes GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities The objective of this Statement is to improve guidance regarding the identification of fiduciary activities for accounting and financial reporting purposes and how those activities should be reported. This Statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments. The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary activity and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary activities. The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2018 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2019, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB issued Statement No. 87, Leases The objective of this statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by improving accounting and financial reporting for leases by governments. This statement increases the usefulness of governments’ financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on the foundational principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. Under this statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right-to-use lease asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments’ leasing activities. The requirements of this Statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2019 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District is in the process of determining the impact this Statement will have on the financial statements. GASB Statement No. 89, Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred Before the End of the Construction Period This Statement addresses interest costs incurred before the end of a construction period be recognized as an expense in the period in which the cost is incurred for financial statements prepared using the economic resources measurement focus. As a result, interest cost incurred before the end of a construction period will not be included in the historical cost of a capital asset reported in a business- type activity or enterprise fund. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2019 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2020, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 90, Majority Equity Interests - an Amendment of GASB Statements No. 14 and No. 61 The objectives of this Statement are to improve the consistency and comparability of reporting a government’s majority equity interest in a legally separate organization and to improve the relevance of financial statement information for certain component units. This Statement also requires that a component unit in which a government has 100 percent equity interest account for its assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at acquisition value at the date the government acquired a 100 percent equity interest in the component unit. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2018, but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2019, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. The requirements should be applied retroactively, except for the provisions related to (1) reporting a majority equity interest in a component unit and (2) reporting a component unit if the government acquires a 100 percent equity interest. Those provisions should be applied on a prospective basis. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations The objectives of this Statement are to provide a single method of reporting conduit debt obligations by issuers and eliminate diversity in practice associated with (1) commitments extended by issuers, (2) arrangements associated with conduit debt obligations, and (3) related note disclosures. This Statement also clarifies the existing definition of a conduit debt obligation; establishing that a conduit debt obligation is not a liability of the issuer; establishing standards for accounting and financial reporting of additional commitment and voluntary commitments extended by issuers and arrangements associated with the debt obligations; and improving required note disclosures. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2020 but have been delayed to periods beginning after December 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District doesn’t believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 92, Omnibus 2020 The objectives of this Statement are to enhance comparability in accounting and financial reporting and to improve the consistency of authoritative literature by addressing practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements. This Statement establishes accounting and financial reporting requirements for specific issues related to leases, intra- entity transfers of assets, postemployment benefits, government acquisitions, risk financing and insurance-related activities of public entity risk pools, fair value measurements, and derivative instruments. The requirements of this Statement apply to the financial statements of all state and local governments. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2020 but have been delayed to periods beginning after June 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District does not believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 93, Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates This Statement establishes accounting and financial reporting requirements related to the replacement of IBORs in hedging derivative instruments and leases. It also identifies appropriate benchmark interest rates for hedging derivative instruments. The requirements of this Statement apply to the financial statements of all state and local governments. The requirements of this Statement apply to the financial statements of all state and local governments. The requirements of this Statement were initially to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2020 but have been delayed to periods beginning after June 15, 2021, pursuant to GASB Statement No. 95. Earlier application is encouraged. The District does not believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. GASB Statement No. 94, Public-Private Partnerships and Public-Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements The primary objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by addressing issues related to public-private and public-public partnership arrangements (PPPs). As used in this Statement, a PPP is an arrangement in which a government (the transferor) contracts with an operator (a governmental or nongovernmental entity) to provide public services by conveying control of the right to operate or use a nonfinancial asset, such as infrastructure or other capital asset (the underlying PPP asset), for a period of time in an exchange or exchange-like transaction. Some PPPs meet the definition of a service concession arrangement (SCA), which the Board defines in this Statement as a PPP in which (1) the operator collects and is compensated by fees from third parties; (2) the transferor determines or has the ability to modify or approve which services the operator is required to provide, to whom the operator is required to provide the services, and the prices or rates that can be charged for the services; and (3) the transferor is entitled to significant residual interest in the service utility of the underlying PPP asset at the end of the arrangement. This Statement also provides guidance for accounting and financial reporting for availability payment arrangements (APAs). As defined in this Statement, an APA is an arrangement in which a government compensates an operator for services that may include designing, constructing, financing, maintaining, or operating an underlying nonfinancial asset for a period of time in an exchange or exchange-like transaction. The requirements of this Statement are to be effective for financial statements for periods beginning after June 15, 2022. Earlier application is encouraged. The District does not believe this statement will have a significant impact on the District’s financial statements. NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS Summary of Cash and Investments The following summarizes deposits as of June 30, 2020: Cash and Cash Equivalents Available Cash and Investments for Operations Restricted Total Cash Deposits: Cash in Banks 1,033,881$ 48,810$ 1,082,691$ Cash with Fiscal Agent - 4,062,851 4,062,851 Petty Cash 1,091 - 1,091 Total Cash Deposits 1,034,972 4,111,661 5,146,633 Investments: California Local Agency Investment Fund 6,697,753 - 6,697,753 CalTRUST - 1,671,245 1,671,245 Brokerage Accounts/Cash with Fiscal Agents 11,013,890 40,769,369 51,783,259 Santa Clara County Pool 34,530,740 4,809,675 39,340,415 Total Investments 52,242,383 47,250,289 99,492,672 Total Cash and Investments 53,277,355$ 51,361,950$ 104,639,305$ Cash in Banks Cash balances in banks are insured up to $250,000 per insured bank by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The District’s accounts are held with various banks. As of June 30, 2020, the District’s bank balances exceeded FDIC coverage by $1,044,181. Fair Value Measurements GASB 72 established a hierarchy of inputs to the valuation techniques above. This hierarchy has three levels: • Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 inputs are quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other than quoted prices that are not observable • Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, such as a property valuation or an appraisal. The District has the following investments with recurring fair value measurements as of June 30, 2020: 12 Months 13 - 24 25 - 60 More Than Rating Fair Value or Less Months Months 60 Months Money Market Accounts n/a 8,484,426$ n/a 8,484,426$ -$ -$ -$ 8.53% Municipal Bonds AAA/A-9,518,348 Level 2 7,036,204 1,862,806 - 619,338 9.57% Corp/Gov Bonds AAA/A-31,177,588 Level 1 27,339,627 3,837,961 - - 31.36% LAIF n/a 6,730,658 Level 2 6,730,658 - - - 6.77% CalTrust A+f 1,671,245 Level 2 - - 1,671,245 - 1.68% Santa Clara County Pool n/a 39,340,415 Level 2 21,302,411 6,139,634 11,898,370 - 39.57% U.S. Obligations AA+/A-2,503,435 Level 1 2,503,435 - - - 2.52% Total Investments 99,426,115$ 73,396,761$ 11,840,401$ 13,569,615$ 619,338$ 100.00% Concen- trationsInvestment Type Input Level Maturities Cash in Santa Clara County Treasury Santa Clara County is a fiscal agent of the District. The fair value of the District's investment in the county pool is reported at amounts based on the District's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by the County Treasurer for the entire portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of the portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by the County Treasurer, which is recorded on the amortized costs basis. Santa Clara County investment pool funds were available for withdrawal on demand and had an average maturity date of less than one year. All cash and investments are stated at fair value. Pooled investment earnings are allocated monthly based on the average cash and investment balances of the various funds of the County. California Local Agency Investment Fund The District is a participant in the Local Agency investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The District reports its investment in LAIF at the fair value amount provided by LAIF, which is the same as the value of the pool share. The balance is available for withdrawal on demand, and is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities, loans to certain state funds, and floating rate securities issued by federal agencies, government-sponsored enterprises, United States Treasury Notes and Bills, and corporations. At June 30, 2020, these investments had an average maturity date of less than one year. Investment Trust of California The District is a participant in the Investment Trust of California (CalTRUST) which is a California joint powers authority that has been established by its members pursuant to an agreement. The California Government Code provides that Public Agencies may purchase shares of beneficial interest issues by a joint powers authority, such as CalTRUST, organized pursuant to the Section 6500 of the Act. The District reports its investment in CalTRUST at the fair value amount provided by CalTRUST. The District participates in the Medium-Term Fund with CalTRUST. The balance in this Medium-Term Fund is available for withdrawal once a week (on Wednesdays), and is based on the net asset value per share on the Wednesday of each week. Included in CalTRUST's investment portfolio for the Medium-Term Fund are collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other asset-backed securities, loans to certain state funds, and floating rate securities issued by federal agencies, government-sponsored enterprises, United States Treasury Notes and Bills, and corporations. At June 30, 2020, these investments had an average maturity date of 2 to 5 years. Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements The District must maintain required amounts of cash and investments with trustees or fiscal agents under the terms of certain debt issues. These funds are used if the District fails to meet its obligations under these debt issues. Restricted for Debt Service As of June 30, 2020, the District had $4,149 held by Zions bank as trustee, pledged to the payment or security of its outstanding bond issues. The District also had $4,809,675 held by the County during the period which was pledged to the payment or security of its outstanding bonds. All transactions associated with debt service were administered by the Bank or County. Restricted for Hawthorne Property Maintenance On November 10, 2011, the District received the gift of the 79-acre Hawthorne property, in Portola Valley, California, and an endowment of $2,018,445 to manage the property in perpetuity. The cash balance restricted for this purpose at June 30, 2020 was $1,671,245. Restricted for Measure AA Bond Projects As of June 30, 2020, the District had $33,044,310 held by Zions bank as trustee, pledged to specific projects related to the acquisition of property to protect and preserve natural open space lands, constructions of public access improvements and recreation and capital enhancements to open space lands to restore disturbed natural areas back to their original condition and function. Restricted for Staffing Facilities As of June 30, 2020, the District had $7,720,572 held by Zions bank as trustee, pledged to finance portion of the cost of acquiring and improving staffing facilities for use by the District. Restricted for Historic Picchetti Reserve As of June 30, 2020, the District had $48,810 held with Wells Fargo, pledged for upkeep on the Picchetti Ranch brick winery building and farm complex. Restricted Cash with Fiscal Agent For the year ended June 30, 2020, the District had a balance of $4,063,202 in a Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) Pension Rate Stabilization Program (PRSP) 115 irrevocable trust for pensions. Participating agencies maintain oversight of investment management and control over the risk tolerance level. Assets in the plan can be accessed to offset unexpected rate increases or be used as a rainy day fund related to their pension plan (CalPERS). These assets are not dedicated to providing plan benefits to plan participants and are not directly used to pay benefits until such time as the District transfers the funds from the PARS trust to the pension plan (CalPERS). The trust restricts the use of the assets to be used solely for pension related expenses. Policies and Practices The District's Investment Policy and the California Government Code allow the District to invest in the following, provided the credit ratings of the issuers are acceptable to the District and approved percentages and maturities are not exceeded. The table below also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code or the District's Investment Policy where it is more restrictive: Authorized Investment Type Maximum Remaining Maturity Maximum Percentage of Portfolio Maximum Investment in one Issuer Medium Term Notes 5 years 30%No Limit Money Market and Mutual Funds N/A 20%10% U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years No Limit No Limit Federal Agency Securities 5 years No Limit No Limit Banker's Acceptance 180 days 40%30% Commercial Paper 270 days 25%10% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30%No Limit Repurchase Agreements 1 year No Limit No Limit Reverse Repurchase Agreements 92 days 20%No Limit Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)N/A $40 million per account No Limit a) Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to the changes in market interest rates. The District manages its exposure to interest rate risk by investing in the Santa Clara County investment pool and LAIF, which had fair values of approximately $9 billion and $101 billion, respectively as of June 30, 2020, and diversifying its investments, as noted above, through the utilization of brokers. b) Credit Risk Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The investment with the County’s investment pool is governed by the County’s general investment policy. The County’s investments in 2020 included U.S. government securities or obligations explicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government that are not considered to have credit risk exposure. See the schedule above for a summary of the District’s ratings by investment type. c) Custodial Credit Risk – Deposits Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the District’s deposits may not be returned to it. The District does not have a policy for custodial credit risk for deposits. However, the California Government code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by State or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under State law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110 percent of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure public deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150 percent of the secured public deposits and letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco having a value of 105 percent of the secured deposits. d) Concentration of Credit Risk Concentration of credit risk is the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of an investor’s holdings in a single issuer. The District’s investment in the County’s commingled pool is diversified by the County Treasurer by limiting the percentage of the portfolio that can be invested in any one issuer’s name. Investments in U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Agency securities explicitly backed by the U.S., and mutual and pooled funds are not subject to this limitation. More than 5% of the County’s commingled pooled investments are invested with the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Federal Farm Credit Bank. NOTE 3 - INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS Interfund Receivables and Payables Interfund transactions are reported as loans or transfers. The District utilizes interfund transactions to account for funding received by the General Fund which is then distributed to the other funds for special uses, such as payment of debt or capital project and to supplement other funding sources. Loans are reported as interfund receivables and payables, as appropriate, and are subject to elimination upon consolidation. The following interfund loans were outstanding at fiscal year end June 30, 2020: Fund Due from Other Funds Due to Other Funds General Fund 9,308,458$ 9,391,445$ Meas ure AA Capital Projects Fund 9,702,604 9,308,458 GF Capital Projects Fund - 311,159 Total 19,011,062$ 19,011,062$ At June 30, 2020, interfund transfers consisted of the following: Fund Transfer In Transfer Out General Fund 889,920$ 20,220,354$ GF Capital Projects Fund 9,827,543 889,920 Debt Service Fund 10,392,811 - Total 21,110,274$ 21,110,274$ NOTE 4 - NOTES RECEIVABLE On December 17, 1997, the District sold the title to and possession of a 50-year fee determinable estate 10-acre parcel near the Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve. The District financed the purchase in the amount of $288,800 over 25 years at a rate of 10% per annum. Monthly principal and interest payments of $2,634 are due on the 1st of each month and late if not paid by the 10th, with the final payment scheduled December 1, 2022. The outstanding balance at June 30, 2020 was $74,509. NOTE 5 - CAPITAL ASSETS AND DEPRECIATION Capital asset activity for the period ended June 30, 2020 is shown below: Balance Deletion s/Balance Capital Assets June 30, 2019 Additions Adjustments June 30, 2020 Non-depreciable: Land 437,763,645$ 12,885,114$ (550,000)$ 450,098,759$ Construction in Progress 16,193,374 10,966,455 (9,846,322) 17,313,507 Total Non-Depreciable 453,957,019 23,851,569 (10,396,322) 467,412,266 Depreciable: Structure and Improvements 28,204,751 1,374,750 550,000 30,129,501 Infrastructure 34,798,646 8,978,747 - 43,777,393 Equipment 2,652,783 161,159 - 2,813,942 Vehicles 5,240,790 154,727 (106,991) 5,288,526 Total Depreciable 70,896,970 10,669,383 443,009 82,009,362 Less Accumulated Depreciation for: Structure and Improvements (10,145,021) (866,293) - (11,011,314) Infrastructure (5,256,432) (1,427,640) - (6,684,072) Equipment (1,539,169) (182,666) - (1,721,835) Vehicles (3,353,958) (647,280) 98,148 (3,903,090) Total Accumulated Depreciation (20,294,580) (3,123,879) 98,148 (23,320,311) Total Depreciable Capital Assets - Net 50,602,390 7,545,504 541,157 58,689,051 Total Capital Assets - Net 504,559,409$ 31,397,073$ (9,855,165)$ 526,101,317$ NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM LIABILITIES The following is a summary of the changes in long-term liabilities for the period ended June 30, 2020: Beginning Ending Due Within Long-term Liabilities Balance Additions Deductions Balance One Year Promissory Notes (Direct Borrowings): Current Interest 24,239,999$ -$ 1,285,000$ 22,954,999$ 1,370,000$ Capital Appreciation 6,580,602 - - 6,580,602 - Accreted interest 2,927,510 507,362 - 3,434,872 - Unamortized Premium 5,151,823 - 183,690 4,968,133 - Subtotal Promissory Notes 38,899,934 507,362 1,468,690 37,938,606 1,370,000 Bonds: Current Interest 179,090,000 - 7,830,000 171,260,000 7,025,000 Unamortized Bond Premium 20,415,576 - 1,120,342 19,295,234 - Subtotal Bonds 199,505,576 - 8,950,342 190,555,234 7,025,000 Net Pension Liability 10,412,478 8,696,336 7,280,187 11,828,627 - Net OPEB Liability 1,862,277 1,163,653 1,525,086 1,500,844 - Compensated Absences 2,368,387 732,284 323,520 2,777,151 883,885 Total Long-term Liabilities 253,048,652$ 11,099,635$ 19,547,825$ 244,600,462$ 9,278,885$ Compensated absences, other postemployment benefits and pension liabilities are paid by the fund for which the employee worked, which included General Fund and MAA Capital Projects Funds. Promissory Notes Hunt Living Trust Promissory Note On April 1, 2003, the District entered into a $1,500,000 promissory note with the Hunt Living Trust as part of a lease and management agreement. The note is due in full on April 1, 2023 and bears interest at 5.5% semi-annually through April 1, 2013 and 5.0% per annum until the maturity, or prior redemption, of the note. 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes On January 19, 2012, the District advance refunded $34,652,643 in 1999 lease revenue bonds by issuing $31,264,707 in promissory notes. The 2012 notes bear interest rates ranging from 2.00% to 6.04%. The notes are a blend of current interest and capital appreciation notes maturing through 2042. The net proceeds of $33,295,663 (after payment of $278,683 in underwriting fees, insurance, and other issuance costs and a premium of $2,309,638) were used to purchase U.S government securities. Those securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the 1999 Series bonds. As a result, the 1999 Series bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the long-term debt in the financial statements. The 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes were partially defeased during fiscal year 2018 with issuance of the 2017 Refunding Bond as noted below. The notes are secured by limited ad valorem property taxes levied upon all taxable property in the District. 2015 Refunding Promissory Notes On January 22, 2015, the District advance refunded $29,986,962 in 2004 Revenue Bonds by issuing $28,578,500 in promissory notes. The 2015 notes bear interest rates ranging from 2.00% to 5.00%. The notes are current interest notes maturing through 2035. The net proceeds of $28,325,491 (after payment of $253,009 in underwriting fees, insurance, and other issuance costs and a premium of $4,948,500) were used to purchase U.S government securities. Those securities were deposited in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide for all future debt service payments on the 2004 Revenue Bonds. As a result, the 2004 Revenue Bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the long-term debt in the financial statements. The notes are secured by limited ad valorem property taxes levied upon all taxable property in the District. Revenue and General Obligation Bonds 2011 Revenue Bonds On May 19, 2011, the Authority, on behalf of the District, issued $20,500,000 of 2011 Revenue Bonds for the purpose of acquiring land to preserve and use as open space and pay bond issue and related costs. The Bonds are not general obligations. Each period, the District will appropriate revenues-mainly limited properly tax collections that Santa Clara County and San Mateo County allocate to the District – to pay its obligations under a Lease Agreement for use and occupancy of District land in addition to other District debt and lease obligations unrelated to this financing. The Current Interest Bonds bear interest at 2.0% to 6.0% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Principal payments on the Current Interest Bonds are due annually September 1. This Bond was partially defeased during fiscal year 2017 with issuance of the 2016 Refunding Series A and B Green Bonds as noted below. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2015A and 2015B General Obligation Bonds On July 29, 2015, the District issued $40,000,000 of 2015A general obligation bonds and $5,000,000 of 2015B federally taxable general obligation bonds to finance certain projects authorized by voters. The bonds bear interest from 1.5% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $2,559,224 with an underwriter’s discount of $107,599 and issuance costs of $170,000. The bonds are secured by ad valorem property taxes levied by the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2016A and 2016B Refunding Green Bonds On September 8, 2016 the District issued $54,490,000 of 2016 Refunding Series A and $2,920,000 of 2016 Refunding Series B Green Bonds for the purpose of refunding its outstanding obligations under the 2007 Series A Revenue Refunding Bonds and prepay a portion of its obligations under the 2011 Lease Revenue Bonds. As a result, the 2007 Series A Revenue Refunding Bonds and the 2011 Lease Revenue Bonds are considered to be defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the government-wide financial statement of net position. The refunding resulted in a difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt of $5,032,161, which is reported as a deferred outflow on the government-wide statement of net position. This difference, reported in the accompanying financial statements as a deduction from bonds payable, is being charged to operations through fiscal year 2036 using the straight-line method. The District completed the refunding to obtain an economic gain (difference between the present value of the old and the new debt service payments) of $12,694,440. The 2016 Refunding Green Bonds Series A bears interest from 2.0% to 5.0% and the Series B bears interest of 0.73%. Interest for both Series A and B are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Principal payments for Series A began September 2017 and are due annually thereafter until September 2036. Series B has only one principal payment in September 2017. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2017 Series A Refunding Green Bonds On December 13, 2017 the District issued $25,025,000 of 2017 Refunding Green Bonds for the purpose of partially refunding its outstanding obligations under the 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes. The proceeds of the 2017 Refunding Green Bonds, together with $676,232 of other District funds, were used to defease and redeem $11,605,000 principal amount of the District’s outstanding 2012 Current Interest Notes and $8,894,106 initial principal of the District’s outstanding 2012 Capital Appreciation Notes, collectively, the 2012 Refunding Promissory Notes. The amounts defeased have been removed from the government-wide financial statement of net position. The refunding resulted in a difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the old debt of $4,113,597, which is reported as a deferred outflow on the government-wide statement of net position. This difference, reported in the accompanying financial statements as a deduction from bonds payable, is being charged to operations through fiscal year 2033 using the straight-line method. The District completed the refunding to obtain an economic gain (difference between the present value of the old and the new debt service payments) of $8,882,524. The 2017 Refunding Green Bonds bears interest from 3.125% to 5.0%. Interest is due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. Principal payments begin September 2025 and are due annually thereafter until September 2037. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2017 Series B Parity Bonds On December 13, 2017, the District issued $11,220,000 of 2017 parity bonds to finance portion of the cost of acquiring and improving staffing facilities for use by the District. The bonds bear interest of 5% and are due semi-annually on June 30 and December 30. The bonds were issued at a premium of $1,413,434 and issuance costs of $133,434. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. 2018 General Obligation Bonds On February 1, 2018, the District issued $50,000,000 of 2018 general obligation bonds to finance 25 projects specified in Measure AA. The bonds bear interest from 2% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $3,691,291 with an issuance costs of $455,462. The bonds are secured by the District’s share of the general 1% ad valorem property tax levied in the District. There is no remedy to the District for default beyond the security provided in the indenture and debt reserves established. The following schedule summarizes the District’s outstanding promissory notes and bonds as of June 30, 2020: Original Beginning Ending Long Term Debt Issue Balance Additions Retirements Balance Promissory Notes (Direct Borrowings): Hunt Note 1,500,000$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 2012 Refunding Note Current Int.15,790,000 1,729,999 - 410,000 1,319,999 2012 Refunding Note Cap Apprec.15,474,708 6,580,602 - - 6,580,602 2015 Refunding Note 23,630,000 21,010,000 - 875,000 20,135,000 Subtotal Promissory Notes 56,394,708 30,820,601 - 1,285,000 29,535,601 Bonds: 2011 Lease Revenue 20,500,000 750,000 - 215,000 535,000 2015A General Obligation Bonds 40,000,000 40,000,000 - - 40,000,000 2015B General Obligation Bonds 5,000,000 2,460,000 - 905,000 1,555,000 2016 Refunding Bonds 57,410,000 50,435,000 - 3,025,000 47,410,000 2017 Refunding Bonds 25,025,000 25,025,000 - - 25,025,000 2017 Parity Bonds 11,220,000 10,420,000 - 940,000 9,480,000 2018 General Obligation Bonds 50,000,000 50,000,000 - 2,745,000 47,255,000 Subtotal Bonds 209,155,000 179,090,000 - 7,830,000 171,260,000 Accreted Interest: 2012 Refunding Note 2,927,510 507,362 - 3,434,872 Subtotal Accreted Interest 2,927,510 507,362 - 3,434,872 Unamortized Bond Premium 25,567,399 - 1,304,032 24,263,367 Total Long Term Debt 265,549,708$ 238,405,510$ 507,362$ 10,419,032$ 228,493,840$ The promissory notes future debt service requirements as of June 30, 2020 were as follows: Year Ending June 30,Principal Remaining Accretion Interest Total 2021 1,370,000$ -$ 1,084,025$ 2,454,025$ 2022 1,445,000 - 1,029,625 2,474,625 2023 3,040,000 - 963,950 4,003,950 2024 1,170,000 - 825,750 1,995,750 2025 1,225,000 - 765,875 1,990,875 2026-2030 7,507,418 - 2,814,875 10,322,293 2031-2035 13,778,183 6,328,738 927,250 21,034,171 2036-2040 - 2,190,790 - 2,190,790 Total Debt Service 29,535,601$ 8,519,528$ 8,411,350$ 46,466,479$ The bonds future debt service requirements as of June 30, 2020 were as follows: Year Ending June 30,Principal Remaining Accretion Interest Total 2021 7,025,000$ -$ 7,161,901$ 14,186,901$ 2022 6,675,000 - 6,895,263 13,570,263 2023 6,990,000 - 6,589,537 13,579,537 2024 7,375,000 - 6,239,763 13,614,763 2025 7,780,000 - 5,865,663 13,645,663 2026-2030 39,265,000 - 23,247,577 62,512,577 2031-2035 24,405,000 - 16,590,233 40,995,233 2036-2040 37,695,000 - 9,736,138 47,431,138 2041-2045 21,580,000 - 4,720,000 26,300,000 2046-2050 12,470,000 - 867,000 13,337,000 Total Debt Service 171,260,000$ -$ 87,913,075$ 259,173,075$ Amortization of the deferred loss on early retirement of long-term debt for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2020 was as follows: Beginning Balance 9,395,702$ Amortization (845,125) Ending Balance 8,550,577$ NOTE 7 - RENTAL INCOME The District rents certain land and structures to other entities under operating leases with terms generally on a month-to-month basis. Rental income of $2,275,834 was received during the period ended June 30, 2020. NOTE 8 - CALPERS PENSION PLAN Pension Plan General Information about the Pension Plans Plan Description - The District provides benefits to eligible employees through cost-sharing multiple employer defined benefit pension plans (the Plan(s)) administered by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS). Members of the Plan include all permanent employees working full-time. Benefit provisions under the Plans are established by State statute and District resolution. CalPERS issues publicly available reports that include a full description of the pension plans regarding benefit provisions, assumptions and membership information that can be found on the CalPERS website. Benefits Provided - CalPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full-time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 55 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non-industrial disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost of living adjustments for the Plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. The Plans’ provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2020, are summarized as follows: Tier 1 PEPRA Benefit formula 2.5% @ 55 2% @ 62 Benefit vesting schedule 5 Years 5 Years Benefit payments Monthly for Life Monthly for Life Retirement age 55 62 Monthly benefits as a % of eligible compensation 2.0% to 2.5%2.00% Required employee contribution rates 8.000%6.750% Required employer contribution rates 11.432%6.985% Miscellaneous Employees Covered – At June 30, 2020, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms for the Plan: Miscellaneous Active 154 Transferred 55 Separated 73 Retired 81 Total 363 Contributions - Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees’ Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions for the Plan are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CalPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The District is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions As of June 30, 2020, the District reported net pension liabilities for its proportionate shares of the net pension liability as follows: Miscellaneous Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability/(Asset) $ 11,828,627 The District’s net pension liability for the Plan is measured as the proportionate share of the net pension liability. The net pension liability of the Plan is measured as of June 30, 1899, and the total pension liability for the Plan used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 1899 using standard procedures. The District’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on a projection of the District’s long-term share of contributions into the pension plan relative to the projected contributions of all participating employers, as actuarially determined. The District’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for the Plan as of fiscal years June 30, 1899 and 2020 was as follows: Miscellaneous Proportion - June 30, 2019 0.27629% Proportion - June 30, 2020 0.29538% Change - Increase/(Decrease)0.01910% For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the District recognized pension expense of $3,818,097. At fiscal year June 30, 2020, the District reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resou rces Deferred Inflows of Resources Changes of Assumptions 564,044$ 199,949$ Differences between Expected and Actual Experience 821,548 63,653 Differences between Projected and Actual Investment Earnings - 206,801 Differences between Employer's Contributions and Proportionate Share of Contributions 131,657 1,042,638 Change in Employer's Proportion 1,032,142 57,627 Pension Contributions Made Subsequent to Measurement Date 1,534,253 - Total 4,083,643$ 1,570,668$ The District reported $1,534,253 as deferred outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement date that will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2021. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows: 1,017,319$ (64,915) (15,469) 41,788 - - 978,723$ Deferred Outflows/ (Inflows) of Resources Fiscal Year Ending June 30: Thereafter Total 2022 2023 2024 2025 2021 Actuarial Assumptions - The total pension liabilities in the June 30, 1899 actuarial valuations were determined using the following actuarial assumptions: Valuation Date June 30, 2018 Measurement Date June 30, 2019 Actuarial Cost Method Entry-Age Normal Cost Method Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate 7.15% Infla t ion 2.50% Payroll Growth 2.75% Projected Salary Increase (1) Investment Rate of Return 7.15% (2) Mortality (3) (1) Varies by entry age and service (2) Net of pension plan investment expenses, including inflation (3) Derived using CalPERS' membership data for all funds Discount Rate - The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.15 percent for each Plan. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing, none of the tested plans run out of assets. Therefore, the current 7.15 percent discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long term expected discount rate of 7.15 percent will be applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF). The stress test results are presented in a detailed report that can be obtained from the CalPERS’ website. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building- block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical returns of all the funds’ asset classes, expected compound returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long-term (11-60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the rounded single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short- term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and adjusted to account for assumed administrative expenses. The table below reflects the long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. Assumed Asset Real Return Real Return Asset Class (a)Allocation Years 1 - 10 (b)Years 11+ (c) Global Equity 50.00% 4.80% 5.98% Fixed Income 28.00% 1.00% 2.62% Inflation Sensitive 0.00% 0.77% 1.81% Private Equity 8.00% 6.30% 7.23% Real Estate 13.00% 3.75% 4.93% Liquidity 1.00% 0.00% -0.92% Total 100.00% (a) In the System's CAFR, Fixed Income is included in Global Debt Securities; Liquidity Liquidity is included in Short-term Investments; Inflation Assets are included in both Global Equity Securities and Global Debt Securities. (b) An expected inflation of 2.0% used for this period. (c) An expected inflation of 2.92% used for this period. Sensitivity of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate - The following presents the District’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for the Plan, calculated using the discount rate for the Plan, as well as what the District’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage point lower or 1- percentage point higher than the current rate: Miscellaneous 1% Decrease 6.15% Net Pension Liability 21,676,810$ Current 7.15% Net Pension Liability 11,828,627$ 1% Increase 8.15% Net Pension Liability 3,699,648$ Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position - Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial reports. PARS Section 115 Trust - During fiscal year 2017-18, the District established a Section 115 Trust Fund for Pension Costs with Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS). The amount in this trust is not included as part of the District's net pension liability calculation. NOTE 9 - POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION BENEFITS Plan Description - The District joined the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT), an agent multiple-employer defined benefit postemployment healthcare plan administered by CalPERS. See eligibility requirements below. Retiree benefit continues to surviving spouse if retiree elects survivor annuity under CalPERS retirement plan. The OPEB plan’s audited financial statements are available at https://www.calpers.ca.gov/docs/forms-publications/gasb-75-schedule-changes-fiduciary-net-position- 2017.pdf. Benefits Provided - The following is a summary of the plan benefits provided: Eligibility:Retire directly from the District under CalPER (age 50 and 5 years of service) Continue participation in PEMHCA Retiree Medical Benefit:District pays retiree medical premiums up to: - $300/month effective 1/1/07 - $350/month effective 1/1/09 Must be at least equal to statutory PEMHCA minimum ($122 in 2015, $125 in 2016) PEMHCA Administrative Fee:District pays CalPERS administrative fees (0.32% of premiums for 2015/16) Surviving Spouse Continuation:Retiree beneift continues to surviving spouse if retiree elects survivor annuity under CalPERS retirement plan Minimum Age:Retirement under CalPERS Employees Covered by Benefit Terms - At June 30, 2019 (the valuation date), the benefit terms covered the following employees: Active employees 156 Inactive employees 40 Total employees 196 Contributions - The District makes contributions based on an actuarially determined rate and are approved by the authority of the District’s Board. Total contributions during the year were $572,539. Total contributions included in the measurement period were $670,768. The actuarially determined contribution for the measurement period was $643,000. The District’s contributions were 3.79% of covered payroll during the measurement period June 30, 2019 (reporting period June 30, 2020). Employees are not required to contribute to the plan. Actuarial Assumptions - The following summarized the actuarial assumptions for the OPEB plan included in this fiscal year: Valuation Date:June 30, 2019 Measurement Date:June 30, 2019 Actuarial Cost Method:Entry age normal, level precentage of payroll Amortization Period:7.5 years Asset Valuation Method:Investment gains and loses spread over 5-year rolling period Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate 6.75% General Inflation 2.75% Payroll Increases Aggregate - 3% Merit - CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Medical Trend Non-medicare - 7.25% for 2021, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years Medicare - 6.3% for 2021, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years PEMHCA Minimum Increases 4.25% Mortality, Retirement, Disability, Termination CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Mortality Improvement Post-retirement mortality projected fully generational with Society of Actuaries Scale MP-2019 Healthcare Participation for Future Retirees Currently covered: 90% Currently waived: 60% Discount Rate - The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that the District contribution will be made at rates equal to the actuarially determined contribution rates. Based on those assumptions, the OPEB plan's fiduciary net position was projected to cover all future OPEB payments. Therefore, the discount rate was set to be equal to the long-term expected rate of return which was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total OPEB liability. Long-Term Expected Rate of Return - The long-term expected rate of return on OPEB plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of OPEB plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Percentage of Portfolio Long-Term Expected Rate of Return Global Equity 59% 4.82% Fixed Income 25% 1.47% TIPS 5% 1.29% Commodities 3% 0.84% REITs 8% 3.76% Total 100% Net OPEB Liability - The District's net OPEB liability was measured as of June 30, 2019 (measurement date), and the total OPEB liability used to calculate the net OPEB liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2019 (valuation date) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 (reporting date). The following summarizes the changes in the net OPEB liability during the year ended June 30, 2020, for the measurement date of June 30, 2019: Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 (Measurement Date June 30, 2019) Total OPEB Liability Plan Fiduciary Net Position Net OPEB Liability (Asset) Balance at June 30,2019 5,631,356$ 3,769,079$ 1,862,277$ Service cost 330,788 - 330,788 In terest in Total OPEB Liability 397,289 - 397,289 Employer contributions - 670,768 (670,768) Balance of diff between actual and exp experience (156,450) - (156,450) Balance of changes in assumptions (30,520) - (30,520) Actual investment income - 232,579 (232,579) Administrative expenses - (807) 807 Benefit payments (152,768) (152,768) - Net changes 388,339 749,772 (361,433) Balance at June 30, 2020 6,019,695$ 4,518,851$ 1,500,844$ Covered Employee Payroll 16,838,000$ Total OPEB Liability as a % of Covered Employee Payroll 35.75% Plan Fid. Net Position as a % of Total OPEB Liability 75.07% Service Cost as a % of Covered Employee Payroll 1.96% Net OPEB Liability as a % of Covered Employee Payroll 8.91% Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources - At June 30, 2020, the District reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred Inflows of Resources Difference between actual and expected experience -$ 141,407$ Difference between actual and expected earnings - 46,787 Change in assumptions - 27,585 OPEB contribution subsequent to measurement date 638,539 - Totals 638,539$ 215,779$ Of the total amount reported as deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB, $638,539 resulting from District contributions subsequent to the measurement date and before the end of the fiscal year will be included as a reduction of the net OPEB liability in the year ended June 30, 2021. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows: Year Ended June 30, 2021 (41,894)$ 2022 (41,894) 2023 (21,294) 2024 (13,618) 2025 (17,978) Thereafter (79,101) Total (215,779)$ OPEB Expense - The following summarizes the OPEB expense by source during the year ended June 30, 2020, for the measurement date of June 30, 2019: Service cost 330,788$ Interest in TOL 397,289 Expected investment income (254,386) Difference between actual and expected experience (15,043) Difference between actual and expected earnings (23,916) Change in assumptions (2,935) Administrative expenses 807 OPEB Expense 432,604$ The following summarizes changes in the net OPEB liability as reconciled to OPEB expense during the year ended June 30, 2020, for the measurement date of June 30, 2019: 1,500,844$ (1,862,277) (361,433) Changes in deferred inflows 123,269 Employer contributions and implict subsidy 670,768 OPEB Expense 432,604$ Net OPEB liability ending Net OPEB liability begining Change in net OPEB liability Sensitivity to Changes in the Discount Rate - The net OPEB liability of the District, as well as what the District's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher, is as follows: (1% Decrease )6.75%(1% Increase ) Net OPEB Liability (Asset)2,393,070$ 1,500,844$ 774,353$ Discount Rate Sensitivity to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rates - The net OPEB liability of the District, as well as what the District's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher than current healthcare cost trend rates, is as follows: (1% Decrease )4.25%(1% Increase ) Net OPEB Liability (Asset)1,247,285$ 1,500,844$ 1,852,525$ Trend Rate NOTE 10 - JOINT VENTURES (JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS) The District is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. Prior to July 1, 2002, the District managed and financed these risks by purchasing commercial insurance. On July 1, 2002, the District joined the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CAL JPIA). CAL JPIA is composed of 119 California public entities and is organized under a joint powers agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. The purpose of CAL JPIA is to arrange and administer programs for the pooling of self-insurance losses, to purchase excess insurance or reinsurance, and to arrange for group-purchased insurance for property and other coverages. CAL JPIA's pool began covering claims of its members in 1978. Each member government has an elected official as its representative on the Board of Directors. The Board operates through a nine-member Executive Committee. During the past three fiscal periods, none of the programs of protection have had settlements or judgments that exceeded pooled or insured coverage. There have been no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage from coverage in the prior period. Self-Insurance Programs of the CAL JPIA General and Automobile Liability Each government member pays a primary deposit to cover estimated losses for a fiscal year (claims year). General liability (GL) coverage includes bodily injury, personal injury, or property damage to a third party resulting from a member activity. The GL program also provides automobile liability coverage. Six months after the close of a fiscal period, outstanding claims are valued. A retrospective deposit computation is then made for each open claims year. Costs are spread to members as follows: the first $30,000 to $750,000 are pooled based on member's share of costs under $30,000; costs in excess of $750,000 are shared by the members based upon each individual member's payroll. Costs of covered claims above $5,000,000 are currently paid by reinsurance. The protection for each member is $50,000,000 per occurrence, up to $50,000,000. Worker's Compensation The District also participates in the Worker's Compensation program administered by CAL JPIA. Pool deposits and retrospective adjustments are valued in a manner similar to the General Liability pool. The District is charged for the first $50,000 of each claim. Costs from $50,000 to $100,000 per claim are pooled based on the member's losses under its retention level. Costs between $100,000 and $2,000,000 per claim are pooled based on payroll. Costs from $2,000,000 to $5,000,000 are paid by excess insurance purchased by CAL JPIA. The excess insurance provides coverage to statutory limits. Purchased Insurance Environmental Insurance The District participates in the Pollution and Remediation Legal Liability Program, which is available through CAL JPIA. The policy provides coverage for both first and third party damages, including certain types of cleanups; fuel spill or hazmat incidents; member listed non-owned disposal sites; above ground and underground storage tanks; and for sudden and gradual pollution at or from property, streets, sanitary sewer trunk lines and storm drain outfalls owned by the District. Coverage is on a claims-made basis. There is a $50,000 deductible. CAL JPIA has a limit of $50,000,000 for the three-year coverage period. The current coverage period is July 2017 through July 1, 2020. Each member of CAL JPIA has a $10,000,000 aggregate limit during the three-year period. The current coverage period is July 2017 through July 1, 2020. Property Insurance The District participates in the All-Risk property program of CAL JPIA which includes all-risk coverage for real and personal property (such as scheduled buildings, office furniture, equipment, vehicles, etc). This insurance is underwritten by several insurance companies. Property is currently insured according to a schedule of covered property submitted by the District to CAL JPIA. The All-Risk deductible is $5,000 per occurrence; $1,000 for non-emergency vehicles. Premiums for the coverage are paid annually and are not subject to retroactive adjustments. Boiler & Machinery Insurance The District participates in the optional coverage for boiler and machinery, which is purchased separately under the property program. Coverage is for physical damage for sudden and accidental breakdown of boilers and machinery, and electrical injury. There is a $5,000 per accident or occurrence deductible. Crime Insurance The District participates in the crime program of CAL JPIA in the amount of $1,000,000 per claim, with a $2,500 per occurrence deductible. Insurance provides coverage for employee dishonesty, failure to faithfully perform duties, forgery, counterfeiting, theft, robbery, burglary, and computer fraud. Premiums are paid annually and are not subject to retroactive adjustments. Special Event Tenant User Liability Insurance The District participates in the special events program of CAL JPIA which provides liability insurance when District premises are used for special events. The insurance premium is paid by the tenant user to the District according to a schedule. The District then pays the insurance arranged through CAL JPIA. There is no deductible and the District is added as additional insured. Liability limits are purchased in $1 million per occurrence increments. Vendors/Contractors Program General liability coverage with or without professional liability is offered through CAL JPIA to vendors/contractors who otherwise could not meet the District’s minimum insurance requirement: $1 million per occurrence, $2 million in aggregate. Cyber Liability Program The cyber liability program is partially covered under the liability program, and partially held through a stand-alone coverage program. Cyber liability provides coverage for both first- and third-party claims. First party coverage includes privacy, regulatory claims, security breach response, business income loss, dependent business income loss, digital asset restoration costs, and cyber-extortion threats, while third- party coverage includes privacy liability, network security liability, and multimedia liability. Members work directly with the reinsurer to investigate and respond to claims. There is a $1 million per occurrence limit of coverage, $1 million aggregate limit per policy period per member, and a $10 million aggregate limit of coverage for all members per policy period. NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation The District may be exposed to various claims and litigation during the normal course of business. However, management believes there were no matters that would have a material adverse effect on the District’s financial position or results of operations as of June 30, 2020. Commitments As of June 30, 2020, the District had remaining commitments of $20,617,862 towards construction and other contracts. These commitments are not liabilities of the District’s until services or goods have been rendered/received. The expected date of completion is between June 2020 and December 2099. NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS Management has evaluated all subsequent events from the statement of financial position date of June 30, 2020, through the date the financial statements were available to be issued, December 1, 2020. Beginning in March 2020, the United States economy began suffering adverse effects from the COVID 19 Virus Crisis ("CV19 Crisis"). As of the date of issuance of the financial statements, the District had not yet suffered material adverse impact from the CV19 Crisis. However, the future impact of the CV19 Crisis on the District cannot be reasonably estimated. There were no other material subsequent events that required recognition or additional disclosure in the financial statements. Required Supplementary Information Page Intentionally Left Blank REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY SCHEDULES This schedule presents a comparison of the original budget, final budget and actual revenues and expenditures for General Fund. The schedule presents the difference between the final budget and actuals. PENSION SCHEDULES These schedules present information that shows the District's proportionate share of the pension liability in the cost sharing pools, actuarial information, and contributions. The proportionate share information is useful in determining the District's liability on relation to all other entities in the pool. POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT SCHEDULES These schedules present information that shows the District's total other postemployment benefits (OPEB), plan fiduciary net position, and contributions related to retiree healthcare benefits provided by the District. Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Property taxes 51,863,000$ 51,883,000$ 52,024,342$ 141,342$ Grant income 488,300 388,300 31,396 (356,904) Property management 1,078,000 1,078,000 2,655,179 1,577,179 Investment earnings 2,099,878 2,099,878 1,014,726 (1,085,152) Other revenues 479,157 479,157 261,702 (217,455) Total revenues 56,008,335 55,928,335 55,987,345 59,010 Expenditures: Current Salaries and employee benefits 25,349,838 25,460,977 23,240,060 2,220,917 Services and supplies 11,746,210 10,160,745 7,828,976 2,331,769 Capital outlay 48,000 - - - Total expenditures 37,144,048 35,621,722 31,069,036 4,552,686 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures 18,864,287 20,306,613 24,918,309 4,611,696 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - - 889,920 889,920 Transfers out (18,071,600) (18,071,600) (20,220,354) (2,148,754) Total other financing sources (uses)(18,071,600) (18,071,600) (19,330,434) (1,258,834) Net change in fund balance 792,687 2,235,013 5,587,875 3,352,862 Fund balance beginning 51,352,588 51,352,588 51,352,588 - Fund balance ending 52,145,275$ 53,587,601$ 56,940,463$ 3,352,862$ The District employs budget control by object codes and by individual appropriation accounts. Budgets are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. The budgets are revised during the year by the Board of Directors to provide for revised priorities. Expenditures cannot legally exceed appropriations by major object code. The originally adopted and final revised budgets for the General Fund are presented as Required Supplementary Information. The basis of budgeting is the same as GAAP. Transfers out exceeded budget as noted above because of the transfer to GF Capital Projects Fund for the District's capital projects and debt service payments. Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Budget to Actual (GAAP) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance General Fund Miscellaneous Plan Plan Measurement Date 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Fiscal Year Ended 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Contractually Required Contributions 1,461,069$ 1,358,520$ 1,514,352$ 1,763,650$ 1,358,184$ 1,534,253$ Contributions in Relation to Contractually Required Contributions 1,343,244 4,788,977 2,529,862 1,783,789 1,358,206 1,534,253 Contribution Deficiency (Excess)117,825$ (3,430,457)$ (1,015,510)$ (20,139)$ (22)$ -$ Covered Payroll 8,994,979$ 9,862,578$ 11,834,150$ 12,802,887$ 15,311,826$ 16,297,634$ Contributions as a % of Covered Payroll 14.93% 48.56% 21.38% 13.93% 8.87% 9.41% Notes to Schedule: Valuation Date: June 30, 2018 Assumptions Used: Entry Age Method used for Actuarial Cost Method Level Percentage of Payroll and Direct Rate Smoothing 3.8 Years Remaining Amortization Period Inflation Assumed at 2.5% Investment Rate of Returns set at 7.15% Fiscal year 2015 was the first year of implementation, therefore only six years are shown. The CalPERS discount rate was increased from 7.5% to 7.65% in fiscal year 2016 and then decreased from 7.65% to 7.15% in fiscal year 2018. The CalPERS mortality assumptions was adjusted in fiscal year 2019. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Pension Plan Contributions June 30, 2020 CalPERS mortality table based on CalPERS' experience and include 15 years of projected ongoing mortality improvement using 90 percent of Scale MP 2016 published by the Society of Actuaries Miscellaneous Plan Plan Measurement Date 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Fiscal Year Ended 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Proportion of Net Pension Liability 0.39847% 0.41627% 0.29137% 0.27962% 0.27629% 0.29538% Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability 9,848,203$ 11,420,126$ 10,121,906$ 11,022,824$ 10,412,478$ 11,828,627$ Covered Payroll 8,448,635$ 8,994,979$ 9,862,578$ 11,834,150$ 12,802,887$ 15,311,826$ Proportionate Share of NPL as a % of Covered Payroll 116.57% 126.96% 102.63% 93.14% 81.33% 77.25% Plan's Fiduciary Net Position as a % of the TPL 81.15% 79.23% 80.93% 82.04% 84.37% 83.84% Fiscal year 2015 was the first year of implementation, therefore only six years are shown. The CalPERS discount rate was increased from 7.5% to 7.65% in fiscal year 2016 and then decreased from 7.65% to 7.15% in fiscal year 2018. The CalPERS mortality assumptions was adjusted in fiscal year 2019. June 30, 2020 Schedule of Net Pension Liability Proportionate Shares Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Fiscal Year Ended 2018 2019 2020 Actuarially determined contribution (ADC) 609,000$ 624,000$ 643,000$ Less: actual contribution in relation to ADC (412,000) (670,768) (638,539) Contribution deficiency (excess) 197,000$ (46,768)$ 4,461$ Covered employee payroll 12,802,887$ 13,550,000$ 16,838,000$ Contributions as a % of covered employee payroll 3.22% 4.95% 3.79% Notes to Schedule: Assumptions and Methods Valuation Date: Measurement Date: Actuarial Cost Method: Amortization Period: Asset Valuation Method: Actuarial Assumptions: Discount Rate General Inflation Payroll Increases Medical Trend PEMHCA Minimum Increases Mortality, Retirement, Disability, Termination Mortality Improvement Healthcare Participation for Future Retirees Other Notes Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of June 30, two years prior to the end of the fiscal year in which contributions are reported. The discount rate decreased from 7.0% to 6.5% in fiscal year 2019 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Contributions for Postemployment Benefits June 30, 2020 There were no changes in benefit terms or trend rates Mortality improvement scale was updated to Scale MP-2019 from MP-2017 in fiscal year 2020 GASB 75 requires a schedule of contributions for the last ten fiscal years, or for as many years as are available if less than ten years are available. GASB 75 was adopted as of June 30, 2018. PPACA excise tax was repealed 12/20/19. Since this is after the June 30, 2019 measurement date, the excise tax is included in the June 30, 2019 Total OPEB Liability (TOL). 4.25% CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Post-retirement mortality projected fully generational with Society of Actuaries Scale MP-2019 Currently covered: 90% Currently waived: 60% June 30, 2019 June 30, 2019 Entry age normal, level precentage of payroll 7.5 years Investment gains and loses spread over 5-year rolling period 6.75% 2.75% Aggregate - 3% Merit - CalPERS 1997-2015 experience study Non-medicare - 7.5% for 2019, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years Medicare - 6.5% for 2019, decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.0% in 2076 and later years Fiscal Year Ended 2018 2019 2020 Total OPEB liability Service cost 313,000$ 321,153$ 330,788$ Interest 326,000 361,203 397,289 Differences between expected and actual experience - - (156,450) Changes of assumptions - - (30,520) Benefit payments (113,000) (162,000) (152,768) Net change in Total OPEB Liability 526,000 520,356 388,339 Total OPEB Liability - beginning 4,585,000 5,111,000 5,631,356 Total OPEB Liability - ending 5,111,000$ 5,631,356$ 6,019,695$ Plan fiduciary net position Employer contributions 513,000$ 412,000$ 670,768$ Net investment income 287,000 259,143 232,579 Benefit payments (113,000) (162,000) (152,768) Administrative expense (1,000) (6,064) (807) Net change in plan fiduciary net position 686,000 503,079 749,772 Plan fiduciary net position - beginning 2,580,000 3,266,000 3,769,079 Plan fiduciary net position - ending 3,266,000$ 3,769,079$ 4,518,851$ Net OPEB liability (asset)1,845,000$ 1,862,277$ 1,500,844$ Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total OPEB liability 63.90% 66.93% 75.07% Covered Employee Payroll 11,834,150$ 12,802,887$ 13,550,000$ Net OPEB liability as a percentage of covered employee payroll 15.59% 14.55% 11.08% Total OPEB liability as a percentage of covered employee payroll 43.19% 43.99% 44.43% Other Notes Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of June 30, two years prior to the end of the fiscal year in which contributions are reported. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Changes in Net OPEB Liability June 30, 2020 GASB 75 requires a schedule of contributions for the last ten fiscal years, or for as many years as are available if less than ten years are available. GASB 75 was adopted as of June 30, 2018. There were no changes in benefit terms or trend rates PPACA excise tax was repealed 12/20/19. Since this is after the June 30, 2019 measurement date, the excise tax is included in the June 30, 2019 Total OPEB Liability (TOL). Mortality improvement scale was updated to Scale MP-2019 from MP-2017 in fiscal year 2020 The discount rate decreased from 7.0% to 6.5% in fiscal year 2019. Supplementary Information Page Intentionally Left Blank SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION BUDGETARY SCHEDULES These schedules present comparisons of the original budget, final budget and actual revenues and expenditures for major capital project funds and debt service funds. These schedules presents the difference between the final budget and actuals. BOND PROGRAM EXPENDITURES This schedule presents the program expenditures for the Measure AA Bond Program for the current year and the in total since the inception of the program. Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Grant income 2,108,421$ 2,108,421$ 1,498,087$ (610,334)$ Investment earnings - - 1,007,460 1,007,460 Total revenues 2,108,421 2,108,421 2,505,547 397,126 Expenditures: Current Salaries and employee benefits 471,697 406,558 375,893 30,665 Capital outlay 8,975,950 9,949,233 7,641,519 2,307,714 Total expenditures 9,447,647 10,355,791 8,017,412 2,338,379 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (7,339,226) (8,247,370) (5,511,865) 2,735,505 Net change in fund balance (7,339,226) (8,247,370) (5,511,865) 2,735,505 Fund balance beginning 37,944,253 37,944,253 37,944,253 - Prior period adjustment - - (131,009) (131,009) Fund balance beginning - as adjusted 37,944,253 37,944,253 37,813,244 131,009 Fund balance ending 30,605,027$ 29,696,883$ 32,301,379$ 2,604,496$ Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget to Actual (GAAP) Measure AA Capital Projects Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Grant income -$ 1,960,000$ 1,764,000$ (196,000)$ Investment earnings - - 216,363 216,363 Total revenues - 1,960,000 1,980,363 20,363 Expenditures: Capital outlay 10,546,595 13,520,219 12,459,954 1,060,265 Total expenditures 10,546,595 13,520,219 12,459,954 1,060,265 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (10,546,595) (11,560,219) (10,479,591) 1,080,628 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 7,775,425 7,775,425 9,827,543 2,052,118 Transfers out - - (889,920) (889,920) Total other financing sources (uses)7,775,425 7,775,425 8,937,623 1,162,198 Net change in fund balance (2,771,170) (3,784,794) (1,541,968) 2,242,826 Fund balance beginning 8,254,539 8,254,539 8,254,539 - Prior period adjustment - - 131,009 131,009 Fund balance beginning - as adjusted 8,254,539 8,254,539 8,385,548 131,009 Fund balance ending 5,483,369$ 4,469,745$ 6,843,580$ 2,373,835$ Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget to Actual (GAAP) GF Capital Projects Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive - Original Final (GAAP Basis) (Negative) Revenues: Property taxes 5,435,350$ 5,435,350$ 5,226,322$ (209,028)$ Investment earnings 874,000 950,000 88,317 (861,683) Total revenues 6,309,350 6,385,350 5,314,639 (1,070,711) Expenditures: Debt service: Principal 17,669,563 17,669,563 9,115,000 8,554,563 Interest - - 8,554,563 (8,554,563) Total expenditures 17,669,563 17,669,563 17,669,563 - Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (11,360,213) (11,284,213) (12,354,924) (1,070,711) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in 10,397,375 10,397,375 10,392,811 (4,564) Total other financing sources (uses)10,397,375 10,397,375 10,392,811 (4,564) Net change in fund balance (962,838) (886,838) (1,962,113) (1,075,275) Fund balance beginning 6,775,924 6,775,924 6,775,924 - Fund balance ending 5,813,086$ 5,889,086$ 4,813,811$ (1,075,275)$ Budgeted Amounts Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget to Actual (GAAP) Debt Service Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Expenditures Expenditures from from July 1, 2019 Inception Project through through No. Project Description June 30, 2020 June 30, 2020 AA02 Regional: Bayfront Habitat Protection & Public Access Partnerships 4,304,545$ 6,351,216$ AA03 Purisima Creek Redwoods: Purisma-to Sea Trail, Watershed & Grazing 28,089 1,298,765 AA04 El Corte de Madera Creek: Bike Trail & Water Quality Projects 117,749 1,004,617 AA05 La Honda Creek - Upper Recreation Area 35,017 2,463,776 AA06 Hawthorn Public Access Improvements 4,647 31,249 AA07 Driscoll Ranch Public Access, Wildlife Protection & Grazing 144,070 12,305,504 AA08 La Honda/Russian Ridge: Upper San Gregorio Watershed - 2,153,910 AA09 Russian Ridge: Public Recreation, Grazing & Wildlife Protection 75,089 394,556 AA10 Coal Creek: Reopen Alpine Road for Trail Use 179,219 345,341 AA11 Rancho San Antonio: Interpretive Improvements, Refurbishing 132,064 165,328 AA15 Regional: Redwood Protection & Salmon Fishery Conservation 42,499 3,075,549 AA17 Regional: Complete Upper Stevens Creek Trail 331,108 2,386,441 AA18 South Bay Foothills: Saratoga-to-Sea Trail & Wildlife Corridor 599,539 734,398 * AA19 El Sereno Dog Park & Connections (715) 479,527 AA20 South Bay Foothills: Wildlife Passage/Ridge Trail Improvements 180,412 570,615 AA21 Bear Creek Redwoods: Public Recreation & Interpretive Projects 1,654,798 9,930,484 AA22 Sierra Azul: Cathedral Oaks Public Access & Conservation Projects 148,021 1,225,916 AA23 Sierra Azul: Mt Umunhum Public Access & Interpretation Projects 41,261 22,975,703 AA24 Sierra Azul: Rancho de Guadalupe Family Recreation - 1,591,996 AA25 Sierra Azul: Loma Prieta Area Public Access, Regional Trails/Habitat Projects - 410,150 Total MAA Bond Project Expenditures 8,017,412 69,895,041 Reimbursements from Grants, Contributions, and Other Funds (1,498,087) (4,813,700) Total MAA Bond Project Expenditures - Net Reimbursements 6,519,325$ 65,081,341$ Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Measure AA Bond Program Schedule of Program Expenditures June 30, 2020 * In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the District transferred prior period expenditures for the Saratoga to the Sea Project from the GF Capital Projects Fund. NOTE 1 - BACKGROUND Measure AA is a $300 million general obligation bond approved in June 2014 by over two-thirds of Midpen voters. Proceeds from bonds, which will be sold in a series over approximately the next 20-30 years, will be used to: • Protect natural open space lands • Open preserves or areas of preserves that are currently closed • Construct public access improvements such as new trails and staging areas • Restore and enhance open space land, which includes forests, streams, watersheds, and coastal ranch areas. On July 29, 2015, the District issued $40,000,000 of 2015A general obligation bonds and $5,000,000 of 2015B federally taxable general obligation bonds to finance certain projects authorized by voters. The bonds bear interest from 1.5% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $2,559,224 with an underwriter’s discount of $107,599 and issuance costs of $170,000. On February 1, 2018, the District issued $50,000,000 of 2018 general obligation bonds to finance 25 projects specified in Measure AA. The bonds bear interest from 2% to 5% and are due semi-annually on March 1 and September 1. The bonds were issued at a premium of $3,691,291 with an issuance costs of $455,462. Land acquisition is the first step to open space conservation. The Vision Plan identified 50,000 acres of open space land that, when conserved, would significantly improve wildlife conditions, wetlands, watersheds, creeks, sensitive plant communities and healthy outdoor recreation. As of June 30, 2020, the District has acquired and / or preserved over 1,700 acres of land with $24 million in funding support from Measure AA Funds. NOTE 2 - OVERISGHT COMMITTEE The Oversight Committee is essential to implementing Measure AA and will consist of seven at-large members who reside within the District. The Committee convenes at least once a year and reviews annual Measure AA expenditures and Midpen’s Annual Audit and Accountability report. Each year, the Committee’s findings will be presented to the Board at a public meeting and will be posted on the District’s website. NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The basis of accounting utilized in preparation of this report may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, the accompanying program statement is not intended to present the financial position and the results of operations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Expenditures incurred with Measure AA Bond proceeds are recorded on a modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenue is recognized when it is measurable and available. Similarly, expenses are recognized when they are incurred, not when they are paid. Statistical Information Page Intentionally Left Blank Financial Trends Revenue Capacity Debt Capacity Demographic and Economic Information Operating Information Sources These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the District’s financial report relates to the services the District provides and the activities it performs: 1. Full-Time Equivalent Employees by Function 2. Capital Asset Statistics by Function 3. Operating Indicators by Function Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the Annual Financial Reports for the relevant year. STATISTICAL SECTION This part of the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements,note disclosures,and required supplementary information says about the District’s overall financial health. In contrast to the financial section, the statistical section information is not subject to independent audit. These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the District’s financial performance and well being have changed over time: 1. Net Position 2. Changes in Net Position 3. Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 4. Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds These schedules contain information in relation to the District’s property tax assessments: 1. Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property 2. Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates 3. Pricipal Property Tax Payers 4. Property Tax Levies and Collections These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the District’s current levels of outstanding debt and the District’s ability to issue additional debt in the future: 1. Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 2. Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 3. Legal Debt Margin Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the District’s financial activities take place: 1. Demographic and Economic Statistics 2. Principal Employers 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets 236,546$ 245,393$ 259,638$ 268,869$ 278,611$ 276,395$ 308,601$ 312,121$ 351,152$ 371,186$ Restricted 1,408 1,568 2,731 4,327 2,566 5,786 4,571 7,252 8,207 6,277 Unrestricted 28,142 42,738 36,919 37,951 39,948 39,280 23,831 29,415 8,015 14,617 Total Net Position 266,096$ 289,699$ 299,288$ 311,147$ 321,125$ 321,461$ 337,003$ 348,788$ 367,374$ 392,080$ Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Net Position (amounts expressed in thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Expenses Governmental activities Land preservation 13,768$ 14,312$ 19,338$ 17,930$ 19,478$ 26,080$ 21,783$ 28,910$ 34,304$ 32,482$ Interest and fiscal charges 6,739 7,483 7,273 7,163 7,202 9,752 8,327 8,193 10,449 9,874 Depreciation 882 806 840 1,095 1,232 1,311 1,585 2,399 - - Loss on refunding of debt - - - - - - - - - - Total governmental activities expenses 21,389 22,601 27,451 26,188 27,912 37,143 31,695 39,502 44,753 42,356 Program Revenues Governmental Activities Charges for Services 1,241 1,320 1,381 1,422 1,437 1,636 1,479 1,576 2,360 2,655 Grants and Contributions 1,393 1,453 913 1,901 953 1,194 651 1,613 1,082 3,293 Land donations 17 13,928 3,890 - - - - - - - Total governmental activities program revenues 2,651 16,701 6,184 3,323 2,390 2,830 2,130 3,189 3,442 5,948 Net (expense)/revenue - governmental activities (18,738) (5,900) (21,267) (22,865) (25,522) (34,313) (29,565) (36,313) (41,311) (36,408) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities Property taxes 27,269 28,737 30,270 32,433 35,082 44,980 43,861 47,798 54,395 57,251 Investment earnings 294 375 288 138 202 648 463 1,045 3,648 2,307 Use of money and property - - - - - - - - - - Miscellaneous 311 394 298 182 216 810 784 1,153 1,557 Total governmental activities 27,874 29,506 30,856 32,753 35,500 46,438 45,108 49,996 58,043 61,115 Change in Net Position Governmental activities 9,136 23,606 9,589 9,888 9,978 12,125 15,543 13,683 18,586 24,708 Prior period adjustments - - - 1,971 - (11,790) - (1,898) - - Total Changes in Net Position 9,136$ 23,606$ 9,589$ 11,859$ 9,978$ 335$ 15,543$ 11,785$ 18,586$ 24,708$ Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Changes in Net Position Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting) (amounts expressed in thousands) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 General fund Reserved -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Unreserved, designated in - - - - - - - - - - Unreserved, reported in - - - - - - - - - - Nonspendable - - - - - - 55 36 186 206 Restricted 731 - - 1,702 1,702 1,971 1,971 1,467 1,432 5,527 Committed - - - - 20,400 35,400 35,400 55,300 29,288 30,518 Assigned - - - 5,000 - - - - 1,400 710 Unassigned 26,156 41,782 37,513 34,453 21,330 16,848 23,872 16,306 16,515 19,979 Total General Fund 26,887$ 41,782$ 37,513$ 41,155$ 43,432$ 54,219$ 61,298$ 73,109$ 48,821$ 56,940$ All other governmental funds Reserved -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Restricted 1,408 1,568 1,634 1,621 - 26,894 9,539 59,304 52,975 43,959 Total all other governmental funds 1,408$ 1,568$ 1,634$ 1,621$ -$ 26,894$ 9,539$ 59,304$ 52,975$ 43,959$ Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. The District has implemented GASB 54 effective fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. This Statement establishes new categories for reporting fund balance and revises the definitions for governmental fund types. The District opted not to change the previous years' data. (modified accrual basis of accounting) (amounts expressed in thousands) Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 REVENUES Property taxes 27,269$ 28,737$ 30,270$ 32,433$ 35,082$ 44,980$ 43,861$ 47,798$ 54,395$ 57,251$ Grant income 1,393 1,453 913 1,901 953 1,194 651 1,613 1,082 3,293 Property management 955 1,320 1,381 1,422 1,438 1,636 1,479 1,576 2,360 2,655 Investment earnings 294 375 288 150 216 666 480 1,064 3,649 2,327 Other 551 240 146 145 241 644 609 348 641 262 Land donation 17 13,928 - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUE 30,479 46,053 32,998 36,051 37,930 49,120 47,080 52,399 62,127 65,788 EXPENDITURES Land Preservation 13,682 13,996 18,713 17,303 18,272 28,965 25,807 28,226 29,186 31,445 Capital outlay 11,596 27,190 9,611 8,231 8,445 18,901 19,961 16,440 45,356 20,101 Debt service: Principal and advance refunding escrow 3,301 4,457 2,843 2,999 3,145 4,367 5,193 6,392 6,480 9,115 Interest and fiscal charges 4,786 5,355 6,034 5,859 5,749 6,478 7,190 6,597 9,191 8,555 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 33,365 50,998 37,201 34,392 35,611 58,711 58,152 57,655 90,213 69,216 EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES (2,886) (4,945) (4,203) 1,659 2,319 (9,591) (11,072) (5,256) (28,086) (3,428) OTHER FINANCING SOURCES AND USES Transfers in 7,974 9,827 8,877 8,858 8,894 12,146 15,839 9,409 49,929 21,110 Transfers out (7,974) (9,827) (8,877) (8,858) (8,894) (12,146) (15,839) (9,409) (49,929) (21,110) Other sources 850 20,000 - - - - - - - - Payment to refunded bond escrow agent - - - - - - (68,187) (27,660) - - Issuance of refunding debt - - - - - - 57,410 25,025 - - Advance refunding of revenue bonds - - - - (29,987) - - - - - Issuance of debt - - - - 28,325 45,000 - 61,220 - - Premium from debt issuances - - - - - 2,282 11,564 8,246 - - TOTAL OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)850 20,000 - - (1,662) 47,282 787 66,831 - - SPECIAL ITEM OPEB Funding - - - - - - - - - - NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES (2,036)$ 15,055$ (4,203)$ 1,659$ 657$ 37,691$ (10,285)$ 61,575$ (28,086)$ (3,428)$ Capitalized capital outlay expenditures 11,596 27,190 9,611 8,231 8,445 18,901 19,961 16,440 45,356 20,101 Debt Service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 59.11% 70.11% 47.44% 51.19% 48.68% 37.44% 47.99% 46.02% 53.69% 56.19% Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting) (amounts expressed in thousands) Fiscal Year Secured State Board Unsecured Total before Rdv. Increment Total after Rdv. Increment Total Direct Tax Rate 2011 108,672,177 5,138 6,448,241 115,125,556 110,403,735 1.00% 2012 110,480,451 5,192 6,843,137 117,328,780 112,337,379 1.00% 2013 115,665,767 5,192 7,574,405 123,245,364 117,796,453 1.00% 2014 125,816,313 5,192 8,032,680 133,854,185 128,261,360 1.00% 2015 134,293,819 3,616 8,134,278 142,431,713 136,364,266 1.00% 2016 148,710,117 3,616 8,236,861 156,950,594 151,221,560 1.00% 2017 161,457,837 3,616 8,664,927 170,126,380 163,586,434 1.00% 2018 174,219,310 3,616 9,773,726 183,996,652 177,153,795 1.00% 2019 188,007,378 8,646 10,266,764 198,282,788 191,359,437 1.00% 2020 201,019,887 8,646 9,814,574 210,843,107 203,359,598 1.00% Fiscal Year Secured State Board Unsecured Total before Rdv. Increment Total after Rdv. Increment Total Direct Tax Rate 2011 51,197,326 6,653 2,006,682 53,210,661 49,373,928 1.00% 2012 51,670,521 2,465 1,952,159 53,625,145 49,913,049 1.00% 2013 53,793,234 2,465 1,948,563 55,744,262 51,977,724 1.00% 2014 57,513,572 2,336 2,180,554 59,696,462 55,714,674 1.00% 2015 60,798,837 2,343 2,087,353 62,888,533 58,641,318 1.00% 2016 66,177,633 3,086 2,363,781 68,544,500 63,519,108 1.00% 2017 72,017,698 3,085 2,640,434 74,661,217 68,354,025 1.00% 2018 78,506,564 3,085 2,996,701 81,506,350 73,565,159 1.00% 2019 85,236,395 2,658 2,756,478 87,995,531 79,176,299 1.00% 2020 99,187,975 3,219 2,894,481 102,085,675 92,428,172 1.00% Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. County of San Mateo Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years (amounts expressed in thousands) County of Santa Clara Fiscal Year General Property Tax Levy Other Overlapping Governments Open Space District Total General Property Tax Levy Other Overlapping Governments Open Space District Total 2011 1.00000 0.14951 - 1.14951 1.00000 0.07530 - 1.07530 2012 1.00000 0.15060 - 1.15060 1.00000 0.08120 - 1.08120 2013 1.00000 0.18750 - 1.18750 1.00000 0.08060 - 1.08060 2014 1.00000 0.18740 - 1.18740 1.00000 0.07470 - 1.07470 2015 1.00000 0.18304 - 1.18304 1.00000 0.08530 - 1.08530 2016 4 1.00000 0.17807 0.00080 1.17887 1.00000 0.08420 0.00080 1.08500 2017 1.00000 0.17160 0.00060 1.17220 1.00000 0.10990 0.00060 1.11050 2018 1.00000 0.18133 0.00090 1.18223 1.00000 0.10300 0.00090 1.10390 2019 1.00000 0.17126 0.00180 1.17306 1.00000 0.09240 0.00180 1.09420 2020 1.00000 0.18202 0.00160 1.18362 1.00000 0.10020 0.00160 1.10180 Source: FY 2019-20 Tax Rate Books for San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 Due to the District’s size and that it is located in two counties (County of Santa Cruz excluded), there is no tax rate area that represents the typical total tax rate for the District. The above tax rate areas are the largest in terms of assessed valuation for each County’s portion of the District. 2 The 2019-20 assessed valuation of Tax Rate Area (TRA) 6-001 is $32,480,806.925 which is 10.38 % of the District’s total assessed valuation. 3 The 2019-20 assessed valuation of TRA 9-001 is $10,868,501,012 which is 3.47% of the District’s total assessed valuation. 4 Fiscal Year 2015-16 was the first year in which ad valorem property taxes authorized by Measure AA were levied. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Property Tax Rates Direct and Overlapping1 Property Tax Rates Last Ten Fiscal Years County of Santa Clara (Tax Rate Area 6-001) 2 County of San Mateo (Tax Rate Area 9-001) 3 Taxpayer Taxable Assessed Valuation Rank Percentage of Total Assessed Valuation Taxable Assessed Valuation Rank Percentage of Total Assessed Valuation Board of Trustees, Leland Stanford Jr. University 7,172,848$ 1 2.39%4,901,194$ 1 3.07% Google Inc.6,644,929 2 2.21%434,468 9 0.27% Campus Holdings Inc. 3,570,308 3 1.19%** Hibscus Properties LLC 1,326,840 4 0.44%** Sobrato Interests 1,157,587 5 0.39%** Apple Computer Inc. 1,134,606 6 0.38%690,518 2 0.43% Facebook Inc.920,644 7 0.31%** Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Inc.915,535 8 0.30%564,312 4 0.35% CW SPE LLC 756,467 9 0.25%** Yahoo Holdings Inc.669,497 10 0.22%476,573 7 0.30% Oracle Corp. 647,034 11 0.22%567,172 3 0.35% Menlo & Juniper Networks LLC 623,437 12 0.21%** Richard T. Spieker, Trustee 606,726 13 0.20%** Applied Materials Inc.588,404 14 0.20%361,679 10 0.23% Intuitive Surgical Inc.535,896 15 0.18%** Peninsula Innovation Partnersh LLC 491,710 16 0.16%** Woodland Park Property Owner LLC 419,212 17 0.14%** 441 Real Estate LLC 414,814 18 0.14%** Network Appliance Inc. 394,921 19 0.13%533,962 5 0.33% LinkedIn Corporation 393,656 20 0.13%** VII Pac Shores Investors LLC **485,618 6 0.30% Arden Realty LP **255,201 16 0.16% HCP Life Science REIT Inc.**315,451 12 0.20% Wells REIT II-University Circle LP **310,197 13 0.19% SPF Mathilda LLC **276,782 14 0.17% Silicon Valley CA I LLC **254,274 17 0.16% Redus Woodland LLC **276,516 15 0.17% Slough Redwood City LLC **244,474 20 0.15% MT SPE LLC **249,945 19 0.16% Hewlett Packard Co.**434,763 8 0.27% Symantec Corporation **252,481 10 0.16% Sun Microsystems Inc. **328,708 11 0.21% Total 29,385,071$ 9.79%12,214,288$ 7.64% * Information not available Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Principal Property Tax Payers Current Year and Nine Years Ago (amounts expressed in thousands) Fiscal Year 2011Fiscal Year 2020 Fiscal Year Santa Clara County Taxes Levied San Mateo County Taxes Levied Santa Clara County Collections % of County Levy San Mateo County Collections % of County Levy 2016 1,186,363$ 527,932$ 1,177,636$ 99.3% 524,982$ 99.4% 2017 968,301 431,711 962,730 99.4% 429,436 99.5% 2018 1,558,456 705,842 1,553,773 99.7% 701,923 99.4% 2019 3,365,744 1,532,834 3,348,991 99.5% 1,524,259 99.4% 2020 3,215,052 1,591,352 3,195,317 99.4% 1,577,126 99.1% Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc. Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 District's general obligation bond debt service levy. Prior years are not available. Levy began in FY2015-16 CollectionsLevy 1 Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year General Obligation Bonds Debt Service Monies Available Total Taxable Assessed Value Percentage of Taxable AV 1 Per Capita 2 2011 - - - 159,777,663 0.000% 0.00 2012 - - - 162,250,428 0.000% 0.00 2013 - - - 169,774,177 0.000% 0.00 2014 - - - 183,976,034 0.000% 0.00 2015 - - - 195,005,584 0.000% 0.00 2016 45,000 3,116 41,884 214,740,668 0.020% 15.56 2017 44,225 2,194 42,031 231,940,459 0.018% 15.53 2018 104,570 5,785 98,785 250,718,954 0.039% 36.32 2019 102,880 6,776 96,104 270,535,736 0.036% 35.22 2020 88,810 4,814 83,996 295,787,770 0.028% * * Information not available Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 See the Schedule of Assessed and Actual Value of Taxable Property for property value data. 2 Population data can be found in the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding Last Ten Fiscal Years (amounts expressed in thousands, except per-capita amount) Fiscal Year General Obligation Bonds Lease Revenue Bonds Refunding Bonds Bond Premiums Notes Payable Total Taxable Assessed Value (AV) Percentage of Taxable AV Percentage of Personal Income Per Capita 2011 - 64,995 50,988 607 6,429 123,019 159,777,663 0.077% 0.102% 840.82 2012 - 51,947 49,179 2,515 36,898 140,539 162,250,428 0.087% 0.105% 873.73 2013 - 51,568 47,994 2,351 37,039 138,952 169,774,177 0.082% 0.102% 865.00 2014 - 51,021 50,665 2,188 36,285 140,159 183,976,034 0.076% 0.094% 811.01 2015 - 20,385 49,935 6,973 59,271 136,564 195,005,584 0.070% 0.083% 723.35 2016 45,000 20,290 47,300 9,087 58,698 180,375 214,740,668 0.084% 0.101% 903.18 2017 44,225 1,080 57,410 20,475 58,761 181,951 231,940,459 0.078% 0.094% 836.30 2018 104,570 930 78,870 26,839 34,466 245,675 250,718,954 0.098% 0.118% 1,048.69 2019 102,880 750 75,460 25,567 33,749 238,406 270,535,736 0.088%** 2020 98,290 535 72,435 24,263 32,971 228,494 295,787,770 0.077%** * Information not available Source: Annual Financial Report Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. (1) Details regarding the District's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. (2) Refer to the Demographics Statistics for personal income and population data. Ratios of Outstanding Debt Last Ten Fiscal Years Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (amounts expressed in thousands, except per-capita amount) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Assessed Valuation: Assessed value subject to debt levy 159,777,663$ 162,250,428$ 169,774,177$ 183,976,034$ 195,005,584$ 214,740,668$ 231,940,459$ 250,718,954$ 270,535,736$ 295,787,770$ Total assessed valuation 159,777,663 162,250,428 169,774,177 183,976,034 195,005,584 214,740,668 231,940,459 250,718,954 270,535,736 295,787,770 Debt Applicable to Limitation: Total debt 6,429 36,898 37,039 36,285 59,271 58,698 58,761 34,466 33,749 32,971 Less: amount available for repayment - - - - - 3,116 2,194 5,785 6,776 4,814 Total debt applicable to limitation 6,429 36,898 37,039 36,285 59,271 55,582 56,567 28,681 26,973 28,157 Legal Debt Margin: Bonded debt limit (15% AV)23,966,649 24,337,564 25,466,127 27,596,405 29,250,838 32,211,100 34,791,069 37,607,843 40,580,360 44,368,166 Debt applicable to limitation 6,429 36,898 37,039 36,285 59,271 55,582 56,567 28,681 26,973 28,157 Legal debt margin 23,960,220$ 24,300,666$ 25,429,088$ 27,560,120$ 29,191,567$ 32,155,518$ 34,734,502$ 37,579,162$ 40,553,387$ 44,340,009$ Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Under California Government Code Section 61126 (b) the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District shall not incur bonded indebtedness that exceeds 15% of the total assessed property value. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Legal Debt Margin Information Last Ten Fiscal Years (amounts expressed in thousands) Fiscal Year Population 1 Personal Income 2 (in millions) Per Capita Personal Income 2 Median Age 3 School Enrollment 4 County Unemployment Rate 5 2011 1,805,767 120,376 66,406 36.0 266,256 9.6% 2012 1,832,983 133,912 72,792 36.2 270,109 8.2% 2013 1,860,687 136,176 72,927 36.4 273,701 6.8% 2014 1,882,230 149,650 79,055 36.6 276,175 5.2% 2015 1,906,511 165,265 86,188 36.8 276,689 4.3% 2016 1,925,306 178,496 92,505 36.8 274,948 3.9% 2017 1,936,052 193,680 100,177 37.0 273,264 3.4% 2018 1,947,798 209,020 107,877 37.2 271,400 2.9% 2019 1,954,286 ** 37.4 267,224 2.9% 2020 1,961,969 *** 263,449 10.7% Calendar Year Population 1 Personal Income 2 (in millions) Per Capita Personal Income 2 Median Age 3 School Enrollment 4 County Unemployment Rate 5 2011 727,319 58,201 79,903 39.4 92,097 7.9% 2012 736,760 65,113 88,058 39.6 93,674 6.8% 2013 747,186 65,696 87,711 39.3 93,931 5.6% 2014 753,472 71,043 93,765 39.4 94,567 4.3% 2015 760,769 78,540 102,606 39.8 95,187 3.5% 2016 766,649 82,357 107,207 39.5 95,502 3.2% 2017 769,570 90,249 117,389 39.6 95,620 2.9% 2018 772,372 97,265 126,392 39.9 95,103 2.5% 2019 774,485 ** 39.6 94,234 2.4% 2020 773,244 *** 93,554 10.8% * Information not available Data Sources 1 State of California Department of Finance - http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/e-4/2010-20/ 2 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis 3 U.S Census Bureau, American Community Survey 4 State of California Department of Education 5 State of California Employment Development Department, Labor Market Division Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Demographic and Economic Statistics Last Ten Fiscal Years County of Santa Clara County of San Mateo Employer Number of Employees 1 Rank Percentage of Total Employment Number of Employees 2 Rank Percentage of Total Employment Apple Computer, Inc. 25,000 1 2.44%10,000 5 1.28% Google LLC 24,626 2 2.40%** County of Santa Clara 20,883 3 2.04% 15,550 1 1.99% Stanford University 16,919 4 1.65%10,101 4 1.29% Cisco Systems Inc. 14,674 5 1.43%13,000 2 1.60% Kaiser Permanente 12,500 6 1.22%5,000 10 0.64% Stanford Healthcare 10,034 7 0.98% 5,569 8 0.71% Tesla Motors Inc. 10,000 8 0.98%** Applied Materials, Inc. 8,500 9 0.83% * * Intel Corporation 8,500 10 0.82% 5,684 9 0.73% City of San Jose * * 6,623 6 0.85% Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co. * * 10,400 3 1.33% Hewlett-Packard Co. * * 5,001 7 0.64% Total 151,636 14.79% 86,928 11.06% Employer Number of Employees Rank Percentage of Total Employment Number of Employees Rank Percentage of Total Employment Facebook, Inc. 14,000 1 3.13%** Genentech Inc. 9,500 2 2.12%8,800 1 2.57% Oracle Corp. 7,535 3 1.68%5,600 3 2% County of San Mateo 5,570 4 1.25%6,079 2 1.78% Gilead Sciences, Inc. 4,000 5 0.89% * * Walmart Labs 2,000 6 0.45% * * YouTube 2,000 7 0.45%** Roberto Half International, Inc. 1,668 8 0.37% * * Sony Interactive Entertainment 1,602 9 0.36% * * Electronic Arts, Inc. 1,520 10 0.34% * * Kaiser Permanente * * 3,777 4 1.10% Mills-Peninsula Health Services * * 2,500 5 0.73% Visa, Inc. * * 2,462 6 0.72% Safeway, Inc. * * 2,075 7 0.61% San Mateo County Community College District * * 1,951 8 0.57% SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory * * 1,764 9 0.52% Set Medical Center * * 1,672 10 0.49% Total 49,395 11.04% 36,680 10.73% * Information not available Source: 1 Silicon Valley Business Journal, July 19, 2019 2 County of Santa Clara Finance Department. FY2009-10 CAFR 3 San Francisco Business Times - 2019 Book of Lists and California Employment Development Department 4 Latest information available for principal employers in the County of San Mateo. 2018 4 2010 County of San Mateo 3 County of Santa Clara Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Principal Employers Most Current Year and Nine Years Ago 2019 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Function Office of the General Manager 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Real Property 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Plannning 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 13.00 10.50 10.50 10.50 10.50 Engineering & Construction N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 Public Affairs 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 11.00 12.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Admininstration Reception 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance 3.25 3.25 3.25 4.75 4.75 5.25 9.25 9.25 10.25 11.25 Human Resources 2.00 2.50 3.50 3.50 5.50 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Information Technology 1 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 5.50 7.50 7.50 8.50 8.50 Operations Administration 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Patrol 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 31.00 32.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A Land/Facilities Maintenance 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 28.30 30.30 N/A N/A N/A N/A Resource Management 2 6.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Land & Facilities N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 49.30 53.30 56.30 57.30 Visitor Services N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 41.90 41.90 41.90 43.40 General Counsel 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.50 3.50 Natural Resources 2 N/A 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Total 105.75 109.25 112.25 114.25 126.55 134.55 165.45 173.45 179.45 182.95 Source: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. 1 In 2015, the GIS function was integrated into Information Technology from the Planning Department 2 In 2012, the Resource Management function under the Operations Department became the Natural Resources Department During 2015, the District underwent a complete reorganization which become effective during FY 2016-17. As part of the reorganization, the Planning Department was split with a new Engineering & Construction Department, a portion of Real Property and Operations became the new Land & Facilities Department, and part of Public Affairs and Operations/Patrol became the new Visitor Services Department. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Full-time Equivalent District Government Employees by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Function Land: Number of preserves 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 Acreage: Santa Clara County 32,380.35 32,990.49 33,006.79 33,158.80 33,259.21 33,366.71 33,449.99 33,628.15 33,631.06 33,631.06 San Mateo County 26,704.01 27,625.36 28,668.49 28,977.86 29,063.13 29,452.58 29,643.96 29,664.41 29,854.41 30,636.85 Santa Cruz County 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 2,004.18 less: easements and life estates held by other parties (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,825.88) (1,802.88) (1,802.88) 782.44 Total 59,262.66 60,794.15 61,853.58 62,314.96 62,500.64 62,997.59 63,272.25 63,493.86 63,686.77 67,054.53 Facilities: Administrative office 1111111111 Field/patrol offices 2222222333 Visitor Center 2222222222 Vehicles & Equipment: Patrol vehicles 35 37 39 41 38 37 42 36 34 33 Service vehicles 333581013101114 Maintenance vehicles 6 8 9 13 16 19 25 29 31 31 Administrative vehicles n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 13 15 Motorcycles/ATVs/Electric bicycles 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 27 27 32 Bulldozers/excavators/tractors 17 17 20 21 21 23 23 20 23 23 Dump trucks 44445554611 Water Truck 1222222222 Trailers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 25 27 31 Chippers/mowers 2224455555 Source: Midpenninsula Regional Open Space District Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Beginning with FY2017-18 the District is using a new system for classifying and tracking vehicles and equipment. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Capital Asset Statistics by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Function General Manager Board meetings 31 45 36 35 33 31 31 44 32 28 Resolutions adopted 41 56 20 39 61 61 40 46 47 43 Real Property Acres preserved Santa Clara County 547.04 492.99 16.30 152.01 100.41 107.50 83.28 178.18 2.11 - San Mateo County 115.17 921.35 1,043.14 309.37 393.26 81.45 191.38 20.46 190.00 782.44 Public Affairs Stewardship volunteer hours 11,314 11,843 11,232 13,579 14,354 15,839 17,440 16,088 15,910 10,296 Interpretation/education docent hours 5,433 4,669 5,559 4,718 5,828 4,462 4,697 4,320 4,438 975 Website visits 274,133 434,402 349,398 359,432 418,748 429,891 487,215 589,280 524,387 782,003 Bicycle Accident 22 36 37 30 20 26 19 37 13 30 Equestrian Accident 1 1 2 - 1 2 - - 1 3 Hiking/Running Accident 18 16 16 22 20 14 37 40 11 25 Other first aid 15 25 24 15 25 26 23 31 13 29 Search & rescue 15 10 8 5 8 3 4 2 2 4 Vehicle Accident 11 16 15 14 19 14 17 50 15 47 Fire 5 7 8 16 9 10 9 13 4 7 HazMat 3 - - 1 1 6 1 3 1 1 Citation/Juvenile Contact Report 509 526 737 617 825 767 678 592 405 387 Parking Citation 434 527 621 584 700 645 836 870 375 1,027 Arrests 1 1 2 1 4 3 2 - 2 2 Day Permits 1,059 1,235 1,237 1,521 2,154 2,541 2,530 2,676 2,417 1,350 Multi-day permits 248 225 253 306 306 321 366 419 361 313 Camping permits 259 341 336 393 476 573 613 570 571 441 Source: Midpenninsula Regional Open Space District Notes: Starting fiscal year (FY) 2015-16 the District changed from a fiscal year end date of March 31st to June 30th. As a result, FY2015-16 is a fifteen (15) month period rather than a twelve (12) month period. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Operating Indicators by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years Page Intentionally Left Blank Other Independent Auditor’s Reports INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Los Altos, California We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (the District) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the District’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 1, 2020. Internal Control over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the District’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the District’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the District’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the District’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the District’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. December 1, 2020 San Jose, California Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, California 94022-1404 650-691-1200 info@openspace.org openspace.org PRINTED ON POST CONSUMER WASTE PAPER Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve by Lillian Oliveri Photos on front cover: Top photo: Russian Ridge Open Space Preserve by Joyce Pennell Second row, left to right: Monte Bello Open Space Preserve by Frank Yien; Skyline Ridge Open Space Preserve by Melinda Horn; Monte Bello Open Space Preserve by Jack Owicki. DATE: December 9, 2020 MEMO TO: Board of Directors THROUGH: Ana Ruiz, General Manager FROM: Michael Williams, Real Property Manager SUBJECT: Cloverdale Coastal Ranch Land Conservation Opportunity: Annual Update _________________________________________________________________________ This memo provides an annual update to the Board of Directors (Board) on the progress of Measure AA (MAA)#13 Cloverdale Ranch – Pursue Land Conservation Opportunities project (Cloverdale), which was added as a new project to the Measure AA 5-Year Project List in June 2018 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018‐19 through FY2022‐23. The purpose of the project is to gain an understanding of the property’s conservation values, operations and maintenance needs, community interests and concerns, and opportunities for future public access to inform a future Board decision on the potential acquisition. Despite delays as a result of COVID-19 and the CZU Lightning Complex fire, progress has been made on many key tasks. Key tasks related to the Cloverdale project are grouped into the following focus areas: 1. Understanding of Existing Site Conditions: Develop a working knowledge of the property, based upon a summary of existing site conditions, infrastructure, day to day operation, uses, past studies, and restoration work completed by Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST); 2. Undertake Additional Studies: Work with POST to complete additional studies as needed for a complete understanding of Cloverdale’s operational and maintenance needs; 3. Analysis of Lake Lucerne Mutual Water Company Infrastructure: Develop an understanding of the water company’s rights and responsibilities, infrastructure, administration, day to day operations, and shareholder interests; 4. Community Outreach and Engagement: Undertake community outreach and engagement to foster relationships with the local coastal community, partners, and stakeholders and to understand community interests and concerns related to the possibility of Cloverdale transferring to public ownership; 5. Plan for Expanding Coastal Lands Management: Develop a management plan that addresses operational needs for existing and future Coastal preserves to coordinate priorities for land management, restoration, and future public access; and 6. Land Division Planning: Work with POST on the development of a proposed land division application to the County that seeks to separate Cloverdale’s grazing lands from row crop farmlands while addressing land management, resource protection, and future public access goals. WORK COMPLETED IN 2020 / IDENTIFIED FOR 2021 The project requires ongoing coordination across multiple departments. Building on the progress made on key tasks in 2019, staff continues work in 2020 with planned work in 2021 in the following focus areas: Existing Conditions: Updates to the Existing Conditions Report completed in 2020 have continued as new information becomes available and POST continues to work on restoration and infrastructure projects. In 2020, the District’s GIS and Land & Facilities staff completed a 2-day field mapping exercise to document exact locations of existing infrastructure, making this information available on the Atlas GIS portal and adding greatly to the on-the-ground-knowledge of the property. Additional field days to map existing fence lines and complete minor updates to information logged in GIS is planned for 2021. Additional Studies: In July 2020, the District’s Natural Resources staff prepared an internal technical memo regarding identification of likely habitat essential for four animal species found on Cloverdale: San Francisco garter snake, California red-legged frog, American badger, and Burrowing owl. Based on information about wildlife use of the site and the need for additional protections of these habitat areas, one or more Conservation Management Units (CMUs) may be warranted should the property be acquired by the District. A CMU is defined in Board Policy 4.01 Open Space Use and Management Planning Process as: “areas within preserves, or possibly entire preserves, which because of certain criteria limiting their use, are planned and subsequently managed primarily for preservation of natural resources and viewshed.” Informal consultation with regulatory agencies on the possible configurations of the CMUs was deferred due to COVID-19 and competing project priorities, and will thus be undertaken in 2021. Completion of a botanical survey to document sensitive and rare plant species on Cloverdale was deferred to 2021 due to shelter in place orders issued during the critical spring field study season. Updates to the existing roads and trails inventory previously prepared by Tim Best, Consulting Geologist, was deferred to 2021 due to COVID-19 delays and the subsequent need for the consultant to complete other critical work disrupted by the CZU Lightning Complex fire. Completion of the above-mentioned mapping, informal consultation, and additional studies is necessary before undertaking rangeland management planning to support existing grazing leases and assess the potential for expanding conservation grazing on the property. If significant progress can be made by the second half of 2021, staff will work with POST to develop a scope of work for a rangeland management plan. POST will contract with an independent consultant to begin rangeland management planning. Lake Lucerne Mutual Water Company Analysis: In 2020, staff continued to work with POST and an independent consultant to complete an assessment of the current condition of the water diversion infrastructure and other system components. Field work and analysis was interrupted due to COVID-19 and the CZU Lightning Complex fires, and will soon resume under the guidance of the District’s new Water Resources Specialist. Staff also continued to research and collate information on the water company’s land and water rights. It is anticipated that the assessment will be completed in 2021. Community Outreach and Engagement: Early project outreach and engagement is focused on expanding general understanding of the District’s mission, resource conservation goals, day-to- day operations, and partnerships. In early 2020, District staff met informally with representatives of the La Honda Pescadero Unified School District, Puente del Sur, Sustainable Pescadero, and the Pescadero Municipal Advisory Committee (PMAC). District and POST staff met onsite with each of the two Cloverdale grazing tenants and the five farming tenants to provide an opportunity to get to know the District and our coastal mission, learn about their operations, and answer any questions they may have about how a future land transfer from POST to the District would affect them. Follow up meetings with tenants and introductory discussions with adjacent neighbors and shareholders of the Lake Lucerne Mutual Water Company were deferred due to COVID-19 and the CZU Lightning Complex fire, and will resume in 2021. In 2020, a new information sign up/project notification link was added directly to the Coastside Protection webpage of the District’s website. District staff gave three general interest presentations at the virtual PMAC meetings (Wildland Fire Resiliency Program – August 2020, Mt. Lion Research – November 2020, and Badgers and Burrowing Owl Studies – scheduled for December 2020). Plans to host a series of informal open houses for the community to learn more about our work in natural resource protection, water resource protection, support of local agriculture and grazing, and public access and trails was delayed due to COVID-19. These will be rescheduled when it is safe again to assemble in-person for public gatherings. Coastal Management Plan: A coastal management plan is needed to plan for the expanding operational needs of existing and proposed future coastal preserves. In 2020, staff collated information on how the District has been meeting the Coastal Service Plan’s targets for land management planning, resource inventories, restoration projects, agricultural and rangeland plans, public access planning, operational facilities, staffing, housing, and support of agriculture in tandem with the Service Plan’s land acquisition targets. Staff has formulated criteria to use when investigating possible locations for a new coastal field office and possible interim solutions to fill the gap until a permanent location can be found. Staff is also assessing how coastal area operations and responses are evolving in light of COVID-19 disruptions, increased visitation, implementation of newer programs such as the IPM and Wildland Fire Resiliency programs, and expanded support of emergency response efforts. An outline of a coastal area management plan is in development and anticipated for General Manager;s Office (GMO) review in early 2021. Land Division Planning: In July 2020, the District completed a rigorous 6-month public engagement process for a zoning and subdivision text amendment application submitted to the County of San Mateo in July 2019. The text amendments aim to resolve inconsistencies between County ordinances and the Coastal Act’s exemptions for land divisions by a public agency in relation to public recreation and open space. The process included 14 public meetings with the coastal community and review by the County’s Planning Commission. In July 2020, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors approved the text amendments. In September, County Planning submitted the amendments to the California Coastal Commission for their concurrence under state law. As of the date of this memo, the item has not yet been agendized by the Coastal Commission. District staff is working with County Planning to ensure that the Coastal Commission takes up this item in early 2021. The District and POST cannot submit a land division application for Cloverdale until after the Coastal Commission’s certification of the text amendments. Concurrent to the tasks identified above, staff is engaged in other work related to the Cloverdale project, including: Funding Support: COVID-19 eliminated the 2020 State Budget request for $8 Million to support the District’s purchase of Cloverdale, sponsored by Senator Jerry Hill and Assemblyman Marc Berman. It also eliminated the potential for San Mateo County Measure K funding supported by Supervisor Don Horsley. Despite unanticipated diversion of state and local funds needed to respond to the pandemic, an unprecedented fire season, and commitment to fund climate change solutions, staff will continue to refine funding strategies for the potential Cloverdale acquisition. Possible funding sources continue to include grants, a much-reduced legislative budget ask, and a possible new bond measure in 2022. If successfully obtained, these funding sources would enable the District to reserve some of the funds identified in Measure AA for land restoration work, support of coastal grazing lands, and future public access projects. Regional Planning Efforts: In 2020, the Trails Subcommittees of the Peninsula Working Group (PWG) and the Santa Cruz Mountain Stewardship Network (SCMSN) combined efforts under their new title as the Peninsula Trails Team. The District continues to participate in their regional trails planning meetings to coordinate and support partner agencies such as POST, San Mateo County Parks, GGNRA, SFPUC, Coastal Conservancy, and SCMSN. In 2020, District staff also participated in other regional transportation planning efforts that have an impact on future public access connections to Cloverdale. Recently, District Planning staff met with County of San Mateo Planning / Office of Sustainability staff on the Connect the Coastside Plan to highlight the importance of access to coastal trails, parking areas, and trailheads outside the Midcoast focus area of the proposed plan and how new connections may be made to coastal destinations in the future. In November 2020, the District submitted comments on the Office of Sustainability’s draft Active Transportation Plan for the unincorporated San Mateo County highlighting transportation needs to recreational destinations in unincorporated areas. Other District Projects Relevant to Cloverdale: Other concurrent District projects underway that are relevant to the Cloverdale project include the Grazing Management Policy amendment, development of an Agricultural Policy, the Wildland Fire Resiliency Program, initiation of review of the Basic Policy, the outcomes of the recent report by the Science Advisory Panel on conservation grazing, and implementation of the Routine Maintenance and Facilities Improvements Program. Outcomes of these projects would contribute to future use and management planning for Cloverdale. The Cloverdale project timeline below has been modified from last year to accommodate a minimum one-year extension of the schedule in response to funding and other challenges: Next Steps: 1. Continue work to complete identified tasks 2. Provide annual updates to the Board on project status ### Timeline for Cloverdale Land Conservation Opportunities FY 2018-2019 FY 2019-2020 FY2020-2021 FY 2021-2022 FY 2022-2023 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Existing Conditions Additional Studies/Site Work Lake Lucerne Water Company Analysis Community Outreach and Engagement Coastal Management Plan Land Division Planning Use and Management Plan CEQA compliance Proposed acquisition DATE: December 9, 2020 MEMO TO: Board of Directors THROUGH: Ana Ruiz, General Manager FROM: Matt Anderson, Chief Ranger SUBJECT: Update on the Electric Bicycle Pilot Implementation at Rancho San Antonio and Ravenswood Preserves _____________________________________________________________________________ During its regular meeting on August 12, 2020, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) Board of Directors (Board ) approved a one-year pilot program (Pilot Program) to evaluate select paved and improved trails at Ravenswood Preserve and Rancho San Antonio Preserve and County Park where bicycles are currently allowed for use by class 1 and 2 electric bicycles (e-bikes). (R-20-89). During the Pilot Program, visitors will be allowed to use e-bikes on the designated trails in Ravenswood and Rancho San Antonio. The Pilot Program has two primary components: public outreach and monitoring. The outreach component focuses on informing the public about the trial nature of the pilot through onsite signage and website information. The monitoring component will include intercept surveys and data collection related to compliance, accidents, trail conditions, and visitor experience/complaints. Staff will launch the Pilot Program on December 15, 2020 and run the Pilot Program through December 15, 2021. Pilot Scope  Collect data over a 1-year period at Rancho San Antonio Preserve and County Park on paved and improved trails and at Ravenswood Preserve along the Bay Trail to assess public opinions and perceptions, impacts to trail user experience and safety, facility impacts, compliance and enforcement, and level of use.  Determine approximate counts of e-bike users.  Gather public input and document visitor trail experiences.  Gather data on trail use violations and incidents.  Document trail conditions pre and post Pilot Program  Analyze data and develop findings.  Present findings to the Board for next steps and policy direction. Methodology  Intercept Surveys Trained seasonal staff and volunteers will conduct intercept surveys Monday through Sunday at variable times. Surveys will be conducted for sixteen weeks, four weeks within each quarter (season). Staff anticipate doing a total of 112 survey sessions per preserve, with each session lasting approximately four hours. Visitors contacted for the intercept survey that wish to take the survey online at a later time will be able to do so if they provide an email for follow up. The surveys will document the visitor experience, including any trail use conflicts and ask respondents about their level of support or opposition to e-bike use. Survey staff and volunteers will contact visitors hiking, running, horseback riding (at Rancho), and riding analog bicycles and e-bikes. They will maintain a neutral position towards the use of e-bikes.  Observation Reports During each of the intercept survey sessions, one of the trained seasonal staff or volunteers will make observational reports of all visitor use by activity type. These reports will be used to provide an overall view of the percentage of trail use by activity.  Speed Observations Rangers will measure bicycle speeds of analog bicycles and e-bikes with radar units during each survey week. They will conduct approximately four hours of speed observations per survey week in each preserve.  Trail Assessments Land and Facilities staff have completed pre-pilot trail assessments of all designated trails in the pilot program. Post-pilot assessments will be done in December 2021. The assessments include pictures of the trail every 500 feet, a general assessment of trail condition and of trail use impact/compaction adjacent to the trail.  Incidents and citations A comparison will be made of all reportable incidents, accidents, enforcement activity, and public comments received during the pilot period and over the last three years for each study area. Public Notice Staff will provide public notice of the pilot through:  The District website and social media.  Signs posted in each preserve at strategic locations. Signs will make visitors aware that the pilot is underway, that it is a trial program, include a map of designated trails and provide a web link for more information.  Interested parties list. Emails have been sent to 119 individuals who have corresponded with us over the last two years regarding e-bikes, e-bike access and District e-bike policies. The email advised of the launch of the Pilot Project in December 2020 and provided links to District web information on e-bike access and regulations. After completion of the Pilot Program staff will summarize the results of the Pilot Project in early 2022 and present to the Board for review. At that time, the Board will determine whether to designate the trails included in the Pilot Project for e-bike use or discontinue e-bike use in these preserves. This Pilot Program is not intended to provide the data necessary for the Board to determine whether to allow e-bike access on typical unimproved preserve trails. If adopted as part of the FY22 action plan and budget recommendations, staff will do separate research and outreach on potential e-bike impacts for use on unimproved trails that make up the vast majority of District trails. This information will be presented to the Board for consideration in spring of 2022. ### DATE: December 9, 2020 MEMO TO: Board of Directors THROUGH: Ana Ruiz, General Manager FROM: Sophie Christel, Management Analyst I, Project Manager Kirk Lenington, Natural Resources Manager SUBJECT: Progress Report on Science Advisory Panel Work _____________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The Science Advisory Panel (SAP) provides an independent science-based review of land management topics to inform the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District’s (District’s) open space management decisions and practices. This memorandum updates the Board of Directors (Board) on the work of the SAP. In addition to the Grazing topic literature review, which was completed and presented at the November 4, 2020 Board Meeting (R-20-129), the SAP is working on two other Board-selected topics, Recreation and Monitoring. The first phase of research on these topics will be completed in early 2021. The Board authorized the General Manager to approve a second phase of research upon satisfactory progress. (R-19-32). However, staff is planning to return to the Board in early 2021 to request a slight increase in the contract amount to account for COVID-related impacts (see Board FYI “Updated Scope and Timeline for the Science Advisory Panel” dated August 12, 2020). BACKGROUND On August 28, 2019 (R-19-120), the Board awarded a contract to the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) and subconsultant Point Blue Conservation Science (Point Blue) to form the SAP. These institutions were described at the 2018 Board Retreat (R-18-148) and further discussed by the Board on March 27, 2019 (R-19-32). SFEI was awarded a contract of $100,000 for the first round of research and the Board approved an additional $100,000 for a second round to be added to the contract with the General Manager’s authorization upon satisfactory progress and demonstrated benefits. The initial responsibility of the SAP is to prepare summary white papers on three key topics of interest to the District, as approved by the Board on January 8, 2020 (R-20-05): Topic 1. How can the District effectively and efficiently monitor changes in priority plant and animal populations at the landscape scale? Topic 2: What are the visitation and recreational use benefits and trade-offs to fulfilling District goals, including natural resource protection and ecologically-sensitive public enjoyment and education? Topic 3: Review cattle grazing benefits and impacts: • What is the net climate impact of cattle grazing (e.g., potential increase in soil carbon minus cattle methane emissions)? What are the options, such as grazing regimes or dietary additives, to reduce emissions from cattle grazing? • What are the current scientific results on the effectiveness of managing grasslands and reducing fire risk with cattle grazing? • How does cattle grazing as a land management strategy compare to alternatives in achieving District goals including climate protection and what are the trade-offs? Topic 3 is complete. Findings were presented to the Board on November 4, 2020 (R-20-129). Topics 1 (“Monitoring”) and 2 (“Recreation”) will continue through the summer of 2021. The General Manager will confirm authorization of the second phase in January 2021 after reviewing the initial deliverables on the monitoring and recreation topics. PROGRESS AND NEXT STEPS Monitoring Topic Point Blue is developing a monitoring framework to address Board questions raised on this topic and to guide District monitoring efforts in the long term. Point Blue is drawing on peer-reviewed studies and methodologies to construct a monitoring framework tailored to District lands and needs. Thus far, Point Blue has hosted two virtual workshops with a focus group of District staff. Staff provided Point Blue with relevant documents regarding the District’s biological resources, current monitoring practices, and goals. During the workshops, District staff agreed with Point Blue on two monitoring objectives and the criteria for selecting indicator plants and animals for monitoring. The next steps in the first research phase are to hold a third staff workshop on December 15, 2020, at which Point Blue will present a draft list of target species. A draft monitoring framework will be presented to the Board in early 2021. Deliverables for the second phase are the final monitoring framework and Board presentation, projected for June 2021. Recreation Topic SFEI is conducting the research on this topic in two discrete phases. In Phase I, they are investigating the benefits to people associated with recreation in open spaces. In Phase II, which is expected to commence in March of 2021, they will investigate the ecological tradeoffs. Specifically, regarding tradeoffs, the SAP will present the state of the peer reviewed scientific understanding regarding the types and scale of impact on the natural environment associated with recreational uses. To date, SFEI has reviewed District materials related to public access and recreation and held two workshops with a District staff focus group. They have also assessed over 30 peer-reviewed papers for the Phase I research, focusing on benefits to both physical and mental health and well- being from recreating in large, natural open spaces. In the workshops, SFEI and District staff refined the research question and discussed selected scientific papers and how the findings can apply to the District. Preliminary findings from SFEI’s literature review support the District’s current understanding of the importance of open spaces to human health and wellness. The next steps are the final report and presentation on the Phase I findings (benefits) to the Board on February 24, 2021. The Phase II (tradeoffs) process will be similar to Phase I, with the addition of a Technical Advisory Committee. The final report and Board presentation for Phase II are expected in June or July of 2021. Selection of Topic 4 The contract with SFEI includes a fourth topic, to be selected after the General Manager authorizes the second phase of research. The Board would select the fourth topic on March 10, 2021 from the list previously reviewed by the Planning and Natural Resources Committee (R-19- 149). FISCAL IMPACT After the General Manager authorizes the second phase of research in January 2021, staff will return to the Board to request an amendment to the contract increasing the total dollar amount by an additional $19,000 to $219,000. The $19,000 increase over the original $200,000 Board- approved amount is due to COVID impacts that complicated coordination efforts to complete the initial scoping process. SFEI estimated this increase in August (see Board FYI “Updated Scope and Timeline for the Science Advisory Panel” dated August 12, 2020). To date, $56,609 of the $100,000 for the first phase has been spent. A total of $37,503 was spent in Fiscal Year 2020 (FY20) and $19,106 has been spent in FY21. The FY21 budget includes $150,000 for the SAP, which should be sufficient for work through the end of the fiscal year, including the start of work on Topic 4. Topic 4 will likely continue into FY22. Staff will be requesting funds in the proposed FY22 budget for the remaining contract amount. ###