Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutAAC Minutes 09-01-05City of McCall Airport Advisory Committee September 1st2005 — Minutes The meeting was called to order at 1207 local with members Gordon Eccles, Jerry McCauley, Dan Scott, Frankie Romero and Chairman John Seevers present. Additional persons attending were Rick Harvey (Airport Manager), and Toothman-Orton consulting engineer Kevin Bissell. About 20 concerned airport users were in attendance. Minutes from the August meeting were reviewed. A detail from the August meeting appeared to be missing. With this correction made to the August minutes, Mr. Seevers moved to have the minutes approved, it was seconded and the minutes were approved. John Seevers then voiced his concerns on keeping opinions expressed before the committee brief — roughly 3 minutes, since so much material had to be covered and to prevent the meeting from running too long. Public Comment: ➢ Mr. Mike DeBoer, McCall, inquired about the possibility of the city planting trees along the backside of the hangar row in an attempt to shield the view of the hangars from highway 55. The airport manager said he would look into the possibility of any available tree grants. (note: shortly after the meeting, the airport manager inquired with the city's grant writer to see if this was possible. A similar request was made about 3 years ago and denied because the airport property line was too far from the highway. In the meantime, other possibilities are being explored including reapplying for the same grant) Airport Manager's Report: ➢ New consultant's contract - $900/month — what it provides us. ➢ Tentative Airport Budget — to accommodate consultant expenses ➢ October AAC Meeting — Airport Manager will be at a conference during the first Thursday of October — AAC agreed to hold the meeting on the 13th of October at 12:00 noon at the Fire Station (Legion Hall not available) ➢ Parking Lot — The Airport Manager recommended the AAC delay any decisions on this until October. An airport urban renewal district has been suggested with that meeting being the 13th of September. The emphasis among the AAC member attending the workshop will be the parking lot. ➢ Runway pavement markings repainting — Paint will be purchase through airport budget with painting being conducted by the public works department. ➢ Windsocks will be replaced this fall after snow plow operator is employed. Department will rent a "cherry picker." Manager already has new windsocks. ➢ Airport runway lighting update — spare lamps for all fixtures have been ordered. When snow flags are installed in October, each fixture will be checked and re- lamped with the correct wattage bulb as required. Sign board lamps will all be replaced. An electrical contractor will be hired for the serious problems we have. Problems will be ongoing since most of the receptacle wells are full of water (little or no drainage — installation contract was not properly conducted). ➢ PAPI Runway 16 is operating and was calibration checked (3.25 degrees). The PAPI was flight checked by some AAC members and they recommended that it remain at this angle (July agenda item). ➢ Asphalt repairs, parallel taxiway — contacted 3 contractors and received 2 bids (Valley Paving and Boswell), not awarded as of yet. Asphalt mix of ITD specs were approved by Seattle ADO. ➢ Fencing contract — received 3 bids (Anvil, Cascade and Lake Fork Fence) Lake Fork had the lowest proposal, $24,000 (later changed to $26,000 due to a FAA specification requirement). AAC awarded bid to Lake Fork Fence. Old fence line was cleared out by city public works. Requested grant agreement through Seattle ADO. ➢ Assessment of Snow Removal Equipment — Three different products of equivalent capability were reviewed (Cat, Komatsu, John Deere) and the John Deere salesman was present and gave a presentation. The AAC was most impressed with John Deere and their price. In the meantime the manager is working with the FAA and the State Aeronautics on a possible "piggy back" order or ordering through GSA. The actual order will not be possible until FAA money becomes available in March 2006. ➢ CIP Development — The AAC reviewed the five year priorities for capital improvements. The airport manager will refine this list and work with Toothman- Orton on estimating cost. The possible list was the following: ➢ • Crack sealing — 2005 (reimbursement) • Airport Parking Lot - 2005 • Master Plan - 2006 • Fencing — 2006 • Taxiway asphalt repair — 2006 • Snow removal equipment — 2006 • Land acquisition — 2007(?) • Snow broom — 2007(?) • North triangle parking paving — 2007(?) • North east ramp repave — 2008(?) • Taxiway realignment — 2008(?) • Move hill south of runway — 2009(?) • Move Deinhard (again) — 2010(?) • Lengthen runway — 2010(?) • Land Acquisition Update — FAA says that if the city can buy land (ie; any means of raising capital) the sooner the better. If the city follows the procedures outlined in AC 150/5100-17 then they are eligible for future reimbursement if the funds are available (FAA will not commit to this) and the land is eligible for AIP grants. Several mean of raising capital have since been reviewed by the city attorney and will be presented at the next AAC meeting. �' Airport manager's proposal for AIP funds/matching money for FY2006 (approximate): - Crack sealing (reimburse) - Fencing - Asphalt repair - Snow removal equipment - Master Plan (approx) Total: AIP Funds available Funds remaining New Business: $ 14,530 $ 26,000 $ 7,300 $180,000 $100,000 $328,530 (FAA $13,803) (FAA $24,700) (FAA $ 6,935) (FAA $171,000) (FAA $ 95.000) (FAA$311,43 8) $423,675 $ 112,237 �' John Seevers recommended that proposals to be presented to the board need to be submitted to the Airport Manager two weeks prior to the scheduled meeting date with copies (hard or electronic) for each committee member to review. The agenda (posted one week prior) will contain sufficient description of the proposal. The committee agreed to this procedure. > Hangar 106b  (Aug AAC, Bi-fold door installation), owner submitted a form 7460 and a letter from the neighboring hangar owner. Committee members wanted to inspect the area for incursion of the rail support post into the aft hangar access area. > Hangar 106f  (Aug AAC, Hangar aft extension of 28'), owner gave presentation restating her intensions and her accomplishment of items required by the AAC from the last meeting. She had conversed with the Community Planner, stated that the expansion was for aviation use, would incur the expense of re-routing utilities and would complete a form 7460. The issue of the city not incurring the additional expense of the modification should they have to "buy back" the hangar was debated. The owner insisted that the city attorney be consulted  pending. �' McCall Aviation Proposed Hangar  (Aug AAC) Public comments, questions & answers. Mr. Scott relived himself from the board. Public issues from size, congestion, noise to jet fumes. Mr. Scott gave his responses. Gordon Eccles made motion to approve: Two no votes, Two yes votes. John Seevers said the proposal goes before the City Council with no recommendations or advise from the AAC. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 1440 local.