The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutA 2007-08-14 LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSIONCit of LYNWOOD CKOW ALL AMERICA CITY CA City Aeetiog NaQQenges 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (310) 603 -0220 AGENDA LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION'`MEETI�NGG4 P CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS R E C E I V E D CITYOF LYNWOOD 11330 BULLIS ROAD CITYCLEPVgOP-e-10E LYNWOOD, CA 90262 August 14, 2007 6:30 P.M. ,I PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Lourdes Castro - Ramirez Chair Kenneth West Rita Patel Vice Chair Commissioner William Araujo Dr. Carlos Manlapaz Commissioner Commissioner AUG 0 0 2007 AM PM 7 18191001i2i1i213 1 4 1 5 1 6 Juan Enciso Commissioner Bill Younger Commissioner COMMISSION COUNSEL Law Office of Ronald Wilson STAFF Jonathan Colin, Gabriel Elliott, Dev. Services Manager Interim Director Kimberly Gonzalez, Administrative Analyst I Karen Figueredo, Planning Assistant i OPENING CEREMONIES 1 Call meeting to order. 2. Flag Salute. 3. Roll call of Commissioners. 4. Certification of Agenda Posting. 5. Minutes of Planning Commission Meetings: July 10, 2007 SWEARING IN SPEAKERS 6. The Lynwood Planning Commission shall swear in all persons wishing to testify on any item listed on the Planning Commission Agenda. Residents shall swear to tell, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. PUBLIC ORALS 7 At this time, any member of the public may comment on any issue within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission that is not on the Agenda. Members of the public may also comment at this time on any Agenda Item that is not scheduled for a public hearing. To preserve continuity, the Planning Commission Chair may, at his /her discretion, request members of the public wishing to comment on Agenda Items for which public hearings are not scheduled to hold their comments until just prior to the Commission's discussion of the Agenda Item in question. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS Lf City of Lynwood Proposal For the Planning Commission, residents and general public to review and provide comments on the Administrative Draft Update to the Lynwood Housing Element. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the Administrative Draft Housing Element Update, accept public testimony, provide comments, and recommendations. E 9 Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -14 Tentative Tract Map 2007 -03 (69283) Variance No. 2007 -05 APPLICANT: Alan Ream 11339 -11341 Louise Avenue APN 6194 - 023 -043 Proposal Request to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums, subdivide airspace on one lot for condominiums, variance to reduce parking from required minimum of 32 stalls to 26 stalls. Recommendation ' Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the item to the next regular meeting. CONTINUED REGULAR AGENDA None NEW REGULAR AGENDA 10. Brown Act and Robert's Rules of Order APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Proposal Legal Counsel brief presentation on summary of Brown Act. Legal Counsel brief presentation on motions types under Robert's Rules of Order. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file this item. COMMISSION ORALS STAFF ORALS ADJOURNMENT 3 Adj urn to the regular meeting of the Lynwood Planning Commission on September 11, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California, 90262. rd AGENDA ITEM #5 MINUTES: 07 -10 -2007 LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, July 10, 2007 The Lynwood Planning Commission met in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers. Chair Castro - Ramirez called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. Vice Chair West led the flag salute. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested the roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll. Chair Castro - Ramirez presiding. Commissioners Araujo, Patel, Manlapaz, roll call. Younger, West and Enciso answered the Also present were Redevelopment Agency Attorney Maurice Chenier, Director of Public Works Daniel Ojeda, Civil Engineering Associate Jose Kekula, Development Services Manager Jonathan Colin, and Planning Assistant Karen Figueredo. Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired if the agenda had been duly posted. Development Services Manager Colin stated the agenda had been duly posted in accordance with the Brown Act a minimum of seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting. Item #5: MINUTES — June 12, 2007 Vice Chair Castro - Ramirez announced agenda Item #5, Minutes of the July 12, 2007 Planning Commission meeting and asked if there were any questions or corrections. Motion by Commissioner Enciso to approve the July 12, 2007 Minutes, seconded by Commissioner Manlapaz. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motions to approve both sets of minutes passed 7 -0. Item #6: Swearing In Speakers I Chair Castro - Ramirez requested City Clerk Andrea Hooper to swear in citizens wishing to speak on any agenda item. City Clerk Hooper duly swore in all speakers. Development Services Manager Colin translated swearing in to Spanish. Item #7: Public Orals Chair Castro- Ramirez announced the item and stated any citizen wishing to testify on any issue under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission may speak now. Nobody spoke during public orals. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS Chair Castro - Ramirez requested to make a change to the agenda to move item #14 Public Works presentation to be the first item and then continue the agenda in sequence. Item #14: Public Works Presentation APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #9 and requested the staff report. Director of Public Work Daniel Ojeda and Civil Engineering Associate Josef Kekula gave a power point presentation on the use of Marbelite street lighting standards. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission receive and file presentation. Commissioner Araujo asked about underground electrical installation of some light poles, why it was not required in all light poles. Director of Public Works Ojeda explained that it is more expensive than the overhead wiring and in some cases it is required to be underground; it depends on the area and whether the underground wiring already exists. Commissioner Araujo inquired why not leave the wiring overhead instead of digging underground if it is going to be more expensive. Director of Public Works Ojeda responded that it was for aesthetic and safety. Commissioner Patel inquired about the cost of a Marbelite pole. Director of Public Works Ojeda indicated that the cost of a pole itself and the fixture was about $2,000, plus another $2,000 for delivery, installation and that it varies depending on the order, and the quantity that would be installed. Commissioner West inquired if the City gets a discount by ordering larger quantities. Director Ojeda indicated that that was probable, and clarified that the City does not buy them, that the developer is responsible for buying and installing the light poles. Commissioner West inquired about the new light pole in front of his house because he did not pay for it. Director Ojeda replied that it must be one of the replacement projects from Edison. Commissioner West asked if they would assume all the cost. Director Ojeda indicated that that would be the case. Commissioner West inquired whether Edison was standardizing light poles throughout the area. Director Ojeda indicated that they are replacing all their steel poles with marbelite poles, one city at a time. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked whether light pole colors were standard. Director Ojeda indicated that Public Works requires gray concrete color for the light poles, but that if the development has a color scheme, the use of another color would be taken into consideration. Vice Chair West asked whether the $2,000 cost was for overhead or underground installation. Director Ojeda indicated that it was for overhead. Vice -Chair West asked how much it would cost per hour, and how long it would take to install. 3 Director Ojeda replied that he didn't know, but that he would consult with Edison. Vice Chair West asked about who decides if the light poles need to be underground versus overhead. Director Ojeda indicated that the City of Lynwood does. Vice Chair West asked whether the City was responsible for demolition and repair. Director Ojeda indicated that it was the responsibility of the Developer. Vice Chair West indicated that he was not asking about the developer, but whether the City requested the light pole to be underground instead of overhead. Director Ojeda indicated that Edison took care of it, and that Edison would bid for the project, and that they used their contractor and covered the bills. Vice Chair West inquired about the cost. Director Ojeda indicated that he would not be able to know without any specifics, which include size of the project, location, and width of the streets. Vice Chair West inquired whether the City has ever required light poles to be underground. Inaudible Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired about areas in the city that require underground wiring instead of overhead and if the applicants were aware. Director Ojeda indicated that it is a standard request. Chair Castro- Ramirez said that the Planning Commission does not have to worry about it. Director Ojeda responded that it is resolved at staff level. Vice Chair West inquired whether the conduits where the poles would be installed are already existing or would they be added. 4 Director Ojeda indicated that that is usually the case. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked if it was possible for Public Works to identify which streets are required to have the underground for next meeting. Director Ojeda indicated that he would put a map together and mark it up. Inaudible Commissioner West asked if there was a cap on expenditure and if it is taken into consideration when the 5% exceeds the project cost. Inaudible Director Ojeda indicated that it is taken into consideration. Vice Chair West asked whether it was 5% or greater because he knows a gentleman that thought it was 10 %. Inaudible Chair Castro- Ramirez asked Development Services Manager Colin to clarify. Development Services Manager Colin responded that the policy in the past had been to ask for 5 %. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked if the marbelite pole is a standard part of the project or if it exceeded the 5 %. Director indicated that it was standard. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked if it was part of the 5 %. Director Ojeda indicated that it was part of the 5 %. Vice Chair West asked whether the standard requirement was taken beyond the 5 %. Unintelligible Chair Castro - Ramirez asked about the requirements of other cities as far as improvement requirements similar in size, and that if the City of Lynwood was low, than the City may need to adjust. And if the City was up to standard, then to make sure it did not exceed the cost and enforce the policy. 5 Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about the percentage of existing marbelite street lights in the City of Lynwood. Director Ojeda indicated that about 25 %. Commissioner Manlapaz inquired if the city is intending to change the remaining 75% into marbelite light poles. Director Ojeda indicated that as many as it would be possible; he indicated that it would be possible at present, but that city does not have - enough money to change all of it right now. Commissioner Manlapaz not all (unintelligible) requires marbelite poles. Director Ojeda responded yes. Commissioner Younger asked if marbelite poles were part of our long range development plans, and if they were, will they be a part of a project and a part of plan that the developer submit to the Planning Commission. Director Ojeda responded yes. Commissioner Younger said he does not understand what the discussion is about, if it is part of the requirement. Commissioner Castro - Ramirez said that it needs to be clarified since it is considered a standard requirement, but it is categorized as the 5% cap. Vice Chair West indicated that it was not part of the project, but that it was added to the project. Chair Castro indicated that it was an enhancement. Inaudible Commissioner Enciso inquired if the light pole replaced in front of his house was done by the city. Director Ojeda indicated that it was done by Edison because they are replacing all their steel poles. Chair Castro asked who has discretion regarding the 5 %, was it council, staff, or the director. Also whether it was a requirement or an improvement. She T indicated that this question would keep coming up on future projects so it would be better to define it. Vice Chair West indicated that he has received complains regarding light poles. Chair Castro said it was an enhancement for the city and there were several light poles replaced on her block, and that it looked different and adds to the sense of neighborhood. Vice Chair West agreed with Chair Castro, but indicated that the issue was having statements that differ from the cost of the marbelite pole; he also inquired if there was any way to find the true dollar value, because we were dealing with the 5 %, and with a couple with of calls you can have the 5% reduced and also the other items are added up. He said that his point was to find out what the real value was. Director Ojeda offered to contact the Edison Company to obtain their latest costs for a typical marbelite pole, which will average $4,000, and that it could go up or down depending on where the pole was located, the width of the street, who the contractor was, and whether it was going to be underground or overhead. Chair Castro agreed and requested the average cost of standard light poles with underground and over head in other cities, other policies from other cities and differentiate if it is a standard procedure or part of the project. Development Services Manager Colin responded that Planning will work with Public Works and research where the 5% came from. Vice Chair West indicated that he wants to know the true value of the poles and installation cost because he knows they are not doing it for free. Director Ojeda stated that they do not do the work and that they have to hire their own contractor. Vice Chair West said that in certain cases they were going to do it themselves if they can buy it at a bulk price. Chair Castro - Ramirez received and filed the public works presentation. Item #8: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -11 APPLICANT. Hugo Munoz 12219 Alpine Avenue APN 6168- 019 -014 Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #8 and requested the staff report. Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to construct two attached residences, two - stories in height with two attached 2 -car garages: The existing residence at the front of the lot would remain. The property is located at 12219 Alpine Avenue in the R -3 (Multiple - Family Residential) zone. Chair Castro - Ramirez opened the public hearing. Applicant Munoz asked if the rendering if the rendering that was being presented was of his house and if he could see it because he did not know what he is doing. He said he had nothing to say if everyone agreed with the project. Development Services Manager Colin explained to the applicant that he should give a short presentation of his project. The applicant indicated that his name was Hugo Munoz, and that he resided at 12219 Alpine Avenue, in the City of Lynwood. He explained that he wanted to build two units in the back of his property and hopes Planning Commission will approve the project. Chair Castro asked if he had read and understood the conditions of approval Development Services Manager Colin interpreted for applicant. Applicant Munoz said that if he has to do it, he agrees with the conditions. Chair Castro asked if commissioners had any more questions. Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about the number of bedrooms. Development Services Manager Colin translated to applicant. Commissioner Manlapaz asked if that included the existing house. Applicant Munoz replied yes. He said there were seven in total. Vice Chair West asked if two or more units were to be built on the lot. Development Services Manager replied that was the case. Unintelligible. H Development Services Manager asked for clarification regarding the question. Vice Chair West had questions because the two units looked different. Development Services Manager Colin replied that the existing unit was at the front of the property and the new dwellings would be in the back. Commissioner Enciso inquired if the existing house had a two car garage. Applicant Munoz replied that there is an existing two car garage. Commissioner Enciso asked if the total was three 2 -car garages. Applicant Munoz replied yes. Chair Castro Ramirez inquired if there were any more questions and closed the public hearing. Vice Chair West said rendering of property was not high quality. He indicated that the rendering was exceptionally plain and he wanted to visualize the project as completed. He indicated there was nothing around the windows. He indicated there were a lot of things missing on the rendering. Development Services Manager Colin replied that this was the third time staff asked for an improved rendering from the applicant, and that it seemed there was lack of communication between the designer and property owner. He indicated that staff requested an improvement, and that it did improve, however, it wasn't there yet. Vice Chair West said that rendering such as this one should be copied to show people and give them an idea of the desired output. Development Services Manager Colin said staff couldn't because renderings are copyright, and deferred question to attorney. Planning Commission Counsel indicated that there may be an issue of copyright and that a waiver may be needed. Vice Chair West responded that as an artist he understood what a picture represents. He indicated that one line is fine, two lines are better, and that we should look for something that is viable for the community. He indicated that a better rendering would make it easier to make a decision. Chair Castro - Ramirez agreed that staff should be responsible to present if not the best rendering, but at least one that illustrates key points. Vice -Chair West responded that it was unfair to penalize the applicant. Commissioner Araujo agreed with comments but thinks this should be at the door, and staff should use better examples for future applicants as reference. Consultant Jim Guerra introduced himself and responded that the elevation included in the plans depicted the type of finish and lighting plans. Vice Chair West responded that in the past it had been more helpful to look at the elevations than the blue prints. Consultant Guerra indicated that directions to staff were clear and that he was trying to add up a comment to help commissioner understand better. Chair Castro - Ramirez indicated that the ultimate goal was that the plans meet the zoning requirements, and that the applicant understood the conditions and not for the commissioners to focus on the rendering only. Chair Castro - Ramirez called for a motion. Commissioner Manlapaz motioned to continue the item. Motion was seconded by Vice Chair West. Planning Commission Counsel asked if there were any guidelines for renderings. Vice Chair West indicated that for the last two and a half years, the Planning Commission had requested renderings to be improved and depict requirements that needed to be addressed. Planning Commission Counsel inquired if there were any particular guidelines for renderings. Development Services Manager Colin replied that the rendering is included in the requirements for submittal for a conditional use permit along with plans, application, etc. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked counsel on how to proceed with motions. Counsel replied that Commissioner should vote on the first motion. El Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 5 -2 with Commissioner Manlapaz and Vice -Chair West voting no. Chair Castro Ramirez Approved Vice Chair West Deny - Commissioner Araujo Approved Commissioner Enciso Approved Commissioner Manlapaz Deny Commissioner Patel Approved Commissioner Younger Approved A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED TO, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -11, TO CONSTRUCT TWO ATTACHED RESIDENCES (DUPLEX), TWO- STORIES IN HEIGHT WITH TWO ATTACHED 2 -CAR GARAGES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12219 ALPINE AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6168 - 019 -014, IN THE R -3 (MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ROLL CALL AYES: ARAU]O, ENCISO, PATEL, CASTRO RAMIREZ & YOUNGER NOES: WEST, MANLAPAZ ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Item #9: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -12 & Variance No. 2007 -04 APPLICANT• Jaime Gutierrez 11694 Atlantic Avenue APN 6189 - 001 -900 Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #9 and requested the staff report. Planning Assistant Figueredo presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to construct a one -story commercial building totaling 1,275 square feet with a 411 square foot mezzanine for storage. In addition, the applicant is requesting approval of a variance to reduce the required, rear yard setback from three feet to zero feet on property located at 11694 Atlantic Avenue in the C -2 (Light Commercial) zone. Chair Castro - Ramirez opened the public hearing. Applicant Jaime Gutierrez, 7420 Garfield Avenue, Bell Gardens, CA is the property owner who spoke in support stating he is moving his appliance repair business to the new location. Commissioner Araujo inquired about the height of the building and the thickness of the roof and if the applicant is going to have a parapet or install any mechanical equipment on the roof. Applicant Gutierrez replied no. Commissioner Araujo asked about an exhaust fan. Applicant Gutierrez said he will be not using any type of chemicals. Commissioner Araujo asked about the type of roof. Applicant Gutierrez said yes it was a tile roof Vice Chair West inquired if the roof was flat. Applicant Gutierrez indicated it was. Vice Chair West asked how the flat roof would be installed. Applicant Gutierrez said he did not know how the designer or contractor was going to build it. Consultant Guerra explained that the flat roof is unusual but it can be built, and clarified commissioners' inquiries. Vice Chair West inquired about the ventilation of the building and if there was going to be an air conditioning unit. Applicant Gutierrez replied that he will not need it but if necessary he would install a small unit or window in the future for the office. 12 Commissioner Araujo commented that if it wasn't in the plans, it was because it was not required. Commissioner Enciso inquired about the use of the building. Applicant Gutierrez indicated that it would be used for the repair of major appliances. Commissioner Enciso asked if he was planning to rent the property in the future, and how he was going to solve the problem of not having ventilation or air condition on the office. Applicant Gutierrez replied that he has no plans for that and he is not sure about the future. Commissioner Manlapaz asked the applicant if he was going to use the property as a repair shop. Applicant Gutierrez replied that he will be using it as a shop to repair appliances, for storage of parts and accessories and for storage of his trucks. Commissioner Manlapaz said he was worried about the building being too hot without any ventilation. Applicant Gutierrez replied that they were proposing a sliding door at the rear of the building but that the Design Review Board asked that it be closed because it faces the alley. Commissioner Manlapaz said he was worried about the employees working at the shop without ventilation. Applicant Gutierrez replied that there was going to be only one employee working at the shop. Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about the number of employees at the shop. Applicant Gutierrez replied that he only needs one employee at the shop because most of the work is done at the client's house, and only brings units to the shop when the repair takes more than 24 hours to get repaired. Consultant Guerra clarified that the conditions require any equipment to be installed on the property to be screened was already included in the conditions of approval. He also stated that the Building Code also includes conditions that the applicant must meet. 13 Chair Castro - Ramirez closed the public hearing. Commissioner Enciso asked if the setback reduction from three feet to zero feet was permitted. Development Services Manager Colin replied that granting the variance was not granting any special privileges. Commissioner Enciso inquired if the variance was only for commercial or if it applied to residential. Development Services Manager Colin indicated that the current setback was five feet but that the Commission could reduce it to three feet. Chair Castro inquired about item 15 of the conditions of approval. Consultant Guerra replied that it was not necessary to amend condition number 15. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked to amend the rear setback from 3 feet 1 foot. Development Services Manger reaffirmed the amendment on the rear setback to be from 3 feet to 1 foot to be able to install creeping fig. Commissioner West inquired about the trash. Development Services Manager replied that the changes to be made include relocating the trash enclosure, landscaping around the perimeter, moving the building forward to provide a one foot rear setback and installing creeping fig. Motion was made by Commissioner Enciso to adopt Resolution 3184 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -12 and adopt Resolution 3185 approving Variance No. 2007 -04 as amended, and was seconded by Commissioner Patel. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 7 -0. Castro Ramirez- Approve West- Approve 14 Araujo- Approve Enciso- Approve Manlapaz- Approve Patel- Approve Younger- Approve A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED TO, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -12, TO CONSTRUCT A COMMERCIAL BUILDING, ONE -STORY IN HEIGHT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11694 ATLANTIC AVENUE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6189 - 026 -053, IN THE C -3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ROLL CALL AYES: ARAUJO, ENCISO, MANLAPAZ, PATEL, YOUNGER, WEST & CASTRO RAMIREZ NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED TO, AND APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2007 -04, REDUCING SIDE SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 3 FEET AND REAR SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 1 FOOT IN CONDUCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1,275 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON PROPERTY LOCATEDAT 11694 ATLANTIC AVENUE ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6189 - 026 -053, IN THE C -3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ROLL CALL AYES: ARAUJO, ENCISO, MANLAPAZ, PATEL, YOUNGER, WEST & CASTRO RAMIREZ NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 15 Chair Castro - Ramirez requested to make a change to the agenda to have item #11 next Item #11: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -14 Tentative Tract Map 2007 -03 (69283) & Variance No. 2007 -05 APPLICANT: Alan Ream 11339 -11341 Louise Avenue APN 6194 - 023 -043 Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #9 and requested the staff report. Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums. The residences consist of six (6) building, two stories in height with attached one and two -car garages. The subject property is located at 11339 -11341 Louise Avenue, in the R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone. Staffs recommend the item to be continued until the next meeting pending submittal of revised plans and Fire Department approval. Chair Castro - Ramirez opened the public hearing. Applicant Chris Christensen, 4817 Palm Avenue, Suite I, La Mesa California wanted to clarify that the only non - conforming issue is the parking deficiency and they are working with staff to solve this issue, he also explained the project convert 14 apartment units to condominiums to provide more first time entry home ownership. He is also proposing on the design to provide 28 covert parking spaces and 4 additional guest parking stalls and they still have some issues that are not satisfactory to staff. Applicant is requesting the Planning Commission to approve the project with recommendations or a motion to continue and applicant will work with staff. Applicant also added that the Design Review Board has a favorable opinion of the project and that the project will comply with ADA standards. The Concern is to comply with the parking requirements and the applicant may be forced to reduce the number of units and respectfully requested some consideration. Commissioner Enciso asked if the apartments were occupied and if the renters were going to have first option to buy. 16 Applicant indicated that yes apartments were occupied, and because of the State of California and the Subdivision Map Act, renters needed to receive notices and were given 90 days exclusive right to purchase their respective units. Commissioner Enciso asked where the applicants would live during this time. Applicant responded that they would continue to live there and that relocation assistance would be provided. Chair Castro inquired about the current parking situation Applicant indicated that the area is predominantly single family residential and that there was sufficient room in the street to accommodate two parking spaces. The applicant also commented that the trash enclosure would probably be replaced by small individual trash containers (bins) Commissioner Castro - Ramirez inquired about parking on the street, Applicant deferred question to staff. Commissioner Younger commented that going from apartment complex to condominiums is totally and completely different so consequently the 35 required parking spaces are very vital to this project and inquired how the applicant intended to address it. Applicant explained that he will be providing a two -car garage per unit, and he is also working with staff on guest parking location and also to provide street parking stalls. Commissioner Younger inquired about street parking and told the applicant he is not going to be able to count street parking as part of his parking requirements Commissioner younger made it clear that anybody can part on the streets. Applicant agreed and clarified that they are not including or counting any type of street parking. 17 Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 5 -2 with Commissioner Younger and Chair Castro - Ramirez voting no. Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired if there were any more questions and closed public hearing. Motion by Manlapaz to continued item to next regular meeting August 14 2007, seconded by Commissioner Younger. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 6 -1 Commissioner Araujo voting no. Castro Ramirez- Approved West- Approved Araujo- Deny Enciso- Approved Manlapaz- Approved Patel- Approved Younger- Approved Item #12: Conditional Use Perm No. 2007 -15 (Amendment APPLICANT: Donald Chae 3000 Imperial Highway APN 6169 - 003 -017 Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #12 and requested the staff report. Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated the applicant is requesting approval to develop a parking lot for the Plaza Mexico Shopping Center on a vacant lot (former K & K Furniture) consisting of 392 parking stalls with landscaping around the perimeter, there are going to be 20 light poles and a new six foot high fence around the perimeter. There were some W changes on the Public Works conditions the project is subject to a six month period. Commissioner West inquired about the changes made to the Public Works conditions. Development Services Manager Colin replied that Public Works provided the Planning Department with copies of the changes made around 4:00 pm the same day of the meeting. Commissioner Castro - Ramirez asked to take a moment to review the revised conditions from Public Works. Commissioner Castro - Ramirez asked for staff to explained to the Planning Commission the changes that were made versus the ones on the staff reports. Development Services Manager Colin indicated the changes were going to be reflected on resolution 3191 page number 4 under Public Works Conditions. He reviewed conditions: Condition 17 - requiring the applicant to provide documentation that the lots are legally tied remains. Condition 18 - requiring the applicant to provide grading plans is being modified to requiring applicant to submit drainage plans. Condition 19 — requiring reconstruction of damaged sidewalk along Imperial Highway has been removed. Condition 20 — requiring reconstruction of damaged approaches will remain. Condition 21 — requiring construction of two wheel chair ramps has been modified to construct one wheel chair ramp. Conditions 22 through 26 have been removed. Conditions 27 — requiring permits from the Engineering Division is required for all off site improvements. Condition 28 — requiring storm mitigation plans will remain. Condition 29 — requiring demolition ordinances will remain. Condition 30 — requiring Impact Fees will remain. 19 Condition 31 — requiring abandonment of all existing water services will remain. Condition 32 — requiring the abandonment of sewer laterals will remain. Condition 33 — requiring the reconstruction of damaged sidewalk will remain. Condition 41 — requiring direct pedestrian traffic to imperial highway crosswalk will remain. Chair Castro - Ramirez opened the public hearing. Applicant Victor Gomez 3100 East Imperial Highway Plaza Mexico indicated he is confused about the new changes and requested clarification on which conditions the project would take effect, a combination of both or just the conditions presented. Chair Castro - Ramirez asked staff to clarify. Consultant Guerra explained that the project must follow the condition just presented. Applicant said regarding condition No 18 requiring drainage plans would require the project to have a layer of asphalt to have the adequate drainage. Consultant Guerra said the drainage plan is required just to show how the water drains and is also consistent with the storm water run off. Applicant indicated he has no objection to repairing driveways or to construct a wheel chair ramp on Imperial and State. The applicant objects because the ramp already exists and the condition shall be substandard not aesthetically pleasing; the ramp may be old but is not broken or cracked. The applicant wants to know if the condition is to install a brand new ramp. Consultant Guerra said staff was not able to answer Public Works Conditions. He further stated that if the applicant had any questions regarding Public Works conditions it will be better if the item was continued and have a Public Works representative on the next Planning Commission meeting. Vice Chair West asked applicant if this is the first time the applicant has seen the conditions. Applicant responded that was the case. 20 Vice Chair West mentioned that if the item could be continued to next Planning Commission meeting because the Public Works Conditions were submitted at the last minute. Chair Castro asked the applicant to finish presenting his project. Applicant Gomez said that because of a parking need, he asked commissioners to vote on the item, as opposed to continuing it. The applicant requested the period of the permit to be extended to 10 months instead of the original 6 months. He indicated that it was not feasible for them to extend the project any further because Plaza Mexico has a project for that specific area. Chair Castro asked the applicant to clarify if Plaza Mexico was going to comply with all the Public Works Conditions. -, Applicant Gomez replied if he is granted the permit extension to 10 months by all means Plaza Mexico will comply with all conditions. The applicant also stated that Plaza Mexico is having problem getting the documentation regarding the parcel been tied, Plaza Mexico is in the process of buying more properties and would like to postpone the condition until the next project is on the works to make a whole plan. Commissioner Younger inquired about the extension of the project to 10 months and what is going to happen at the conclusion of the 10 months. Applicant Gomez explained the parking lot would be revised by the Planning Commission subject to conditions and depending on the Council Members giving the green light to continue with the next phase of the Plaza Mexico project. Chair Castro asked staff to clarify this issue. Consultant Guerra said the item before the commission was a Conditional Use Permit that referred specifically to the use of a parking lot, staff is recommending instead of the standard 1 year Conditional Use Permit to give the applicant a 6 months Conditional Use Permit with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to extend the Conditional Use after the 6 months. Regarding the general conditions placed by Public Works, in reviewing the conditions staff felt that they were actually reducing the condition to reflect a temporary use as a parking lot and a number of the conditions that were originally on the recommendations went away as a temporary parking lot. 21 Regarding the issue of tying the lots together, he indicated that the parking lot is located on multiple lots. Applicant Gomez answered that according to Public Works stated that they are multiple parcels. Consultant Guerra requested the Planning Commission to keep that condition and have it reviewed by Public Works they were the best qualified to advise if this item could be removed or modified. He further stated that once again Public Works had reviewed the conditions a second time and decided to keep it. Regarding the extension to 10 months he said it was up to the Planning Commission to vote on it. Applicant Gomez requested if it could be extended to 1 year. Chair Castro — Ramirez requested a clarification from staff. Development Services Manager Colin explained that the original conditions were based of the use of the parking for 1 year, he further stated that if the Planning Commission decided to approved the project for 1 year, then conditions from Public Works will take effect. The modified version of the Public Works conditions is based on the conversation with the applicant of the 6 months project and that is why the conditions were reduced. Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired if the Planning Commission adopts the new Public Work conditions the approval will be only for 6 months. Development services Manager Colin reiterated that if the approval was for 6 months the project will be subject to the latest Public Works conditions. Applicant Gomez affirmed that the Planning Commission has the purview to modify the agenda, and told the Planning Commission that they can modify staffs recommendations. Chair Castro - Ramirez told applicant Gomez that the Planning Commission understands the process and the Planning Commission has the responsibility to ensure the protection and liability Commissioner Manlapaz inquired if the project was going to be used as a parking lot only and if it was going to be used for 6 months. Applicant Gomez requested that it be extended to 10 months. 22 Vice -Chair West inquired about the timeline for fixing the parking lot and if Plaza Mexico was going to be able to have the opportunity to use the parking lot as a parking lot for 6 months. Applicant Gomez agreed with Vice Chair West because Plaza Mexico will have to comply with all the conditions before they are able to use the parking lot. Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired if anybody wanted to speak in favor of this project Margaret Araujo 3621 Cedar Avenue City of Lynwood, she would like to request the Planning Commission instead of approving the project for 6 months to extended to 1 year because knowing how things work in our community and trying to get everyone in place to work on the project it will take a year to have all in place, also the project has been going on for years but due to different reason it did not happen; now they have the opportunity, she asked the Planning Commission to approved the project, but she does not think it is going to be done in a year She also stated as a former owner in Plaza Mexico parking was one of her biggest problems, because customers always complain of the parking. Maria Garcia president of the Lynwood Chamber of Commerce stated that Plaza Mexico is one of its members and she was listening carefully to Mister Colin and she wanted a clarification on Mister Colin position, she wanted to know if Mister Colin was the director or the interim director Chair Castro - Ramirez told her he was the Development Services Manager. Ms. Garcia thanked Chair Castro on the clarification and stated that as a business owner she would like to know who she is dealing with. She told the Planning Commission to be careful of the economic impact and the community impact even thought the approval is only for 6 months or 1 year, the business needs to have the economic expense, so in order to do something such as a temporary permit, she appreciated on behalf of the business owner and residents that the conditions are reasonable. She also told the Planning Commissioners not to consider last minute changes because it is unethical and the city does not deserve it. Connie Rivero owner of two businesses inside Plaza Mexico and part of business commission from Plaza Mexico, told the Planning Commission to consider the permit for the parking lot and to extend the project to 1 year because it may not be possible to use the parking right away if there was going to be construction. She also stated that costumers complain about not being able to find parking and if there was extra space the business owners and employees may be able to use it. Plaza Mexico is a good asset to the city and brings revenues. 23 Miguel Chevarria business owner for 4 years said it has been a problem not having enough parking spaces for his costumers and he believes a year would be better and would give more opportunities for the costumers and businesses. John Reza (inaudiable) owner of Libreria Martinez Books and Art Gallery has been at current location in Plaza Mexico for the past two years. He commented that he goes around a lot to schools all over East Los Angeles and West Los Angeles and he can not help but brag about his location at Plaza Mexico being a cultural center. He said the benches are from Mexico, the rocks are from Mexico, just a beautiful sight. He believed Mrs. Araujo compared it to Olvera Street and his personal opinion is that he believes it is better than Olvera Street. He stated that sometimes he feels like he is working for the Plaza and not for his bookstore; the only problem is and has been parking. He believes the only thing that separates Plaza Mexico from The Grove, South Coast Plaza and The Spectrum is adequate parking. He also indicated that he keeps a detailed log of his clients and sadly 40% of his clients come from Lynwood, he believes there is a bigger pull that Plaza Mexico can attract about 60% of his clients coming within six miles and he believes it is kind of sad and it may be worse for the other merchants. He believes that Lynwood and Plaza Mexico can be a world class location, Lynwood shall be more famous for Plaza Mexico than hosting Paris Hilton for a few weeks and help us help you the citizens of Lynwood. Norma Albergo 3100 Imperial Highway stated that the businesses are desperate for parking, she tells her clients to not come during the weekends because there is no parking and the businesses are really desperate in need of parking spaces for the clients. It would be greatly appreciated if the Planning Commission allowed this project go forward. Applicant Gomez pointed out the lights in the revised plans show light around the property. The perimeter is going to be landscaped and Plaza Mexico will have a truck for irrigation. Vice Chair West wants to hear the applicant's point of view on item number three. Applicant Gomez explained that when Plaza Mexico purchased the property for seven million dollars they also found that the land was contaminated and they are in the process of testing the ground which is a difficult battle because the adjacent tenants do not want the grounds to be tested because they are afraid of contamination and they were advised by their own lawyers not to allow the ground to be tested. 24 He further stated that Plaza Mexico just became aware that the property is made up of several parcels. He requested that the Planning Commission understand that Plaza Mexico was going to be purchasing more properties and they would like to consolidate all the parcels at the same time. Vice Chair West inquired about the water lines and sewer lines to be abandoned and about how was contamination can be avoided. Applicant Gomez said that in order to do that the project would require environmentalist to review the project. - Chair Castro- Ramirez asked for clarification on the condition, since applicant Gomez gave her the impression of him agreeing to all conditions. Applicant Gomez agreed but said he was answering Vice Chair West's question. Chair Castro - Ramirez clarified again that the conditions of approval item no. 17 and the drainage condition the applicant objects. Applicant Gomez clarified that the conditions were requested by staff and the mainlines and sewer lines were going to be capped, and they would have the civil engineer deal with the process on locating the pipes and be able to identify and abandon. Chair Castro - Ramirez wanted to know what item he was talking about. Applicant Gomez clarified once again that he was just responding to Vice Chair West's question and he was not objecting to the conditions to abandon the sewer, water lines etc Commissioner Manlapaz inquired about the future development on the area if the ground is contaminated. Applicant Gomez replied that the cost to clean up the area was around 20 million dollars. Commissioner Manlapaz asked about Plaza Mexico's Plan to build a five story parking structure. Applicant Gomez replied that it was proposed to the council and that it was a four story structure behind La Huasteca, that the parking structre would probably cost 50 million dollars. Chair Castro - Ramirez closed the public hearing. 25 Commissioner Araujo commented about the ground contamination and how some gas stations when they are abandoned they bring pumping equipment to suck out the fumes and condensed into barrels. The remediation and the paving will come later and he thinks the Conditional Use Permit should be approved. Chair Castro asked about the two set of conditions of approval, the one introduced the same night based on six month period and if the Planning Commission has the discretion to extend the approval. Development Services Manager Colin asked the counsel to respond. Counsel responded that the commission had the option of approving and extending the approval. Counsel addressed a question to Development Services Manager Colin as to whether Public Works would have any issue regarding the extension of the project Development Manager Colin stated that Public Works was not present at the time and none of the people present could argue Public Works Conditions. He further stated that based on the conversations between Public Works and Community Development Services Manager Colin, the second set of conditions was based on a temporary structure that would be used for six months. Consultant Guerra pointed out that condition number one has the option of one year extension at the Director of the Development Services discretion. Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired about condition number three of the new set and whether it could be removed. Vice chair West agreed on removing condition number three. Inaudible. Chair Castro - Ramirez confirmed removing condition number three of the revised version and asked if there were any other changes. Consultant Guerra indicated that six months or ten months included construction time. Chair Castro - Ramirez said that there were ten months for the CUP, and that item number three should be reviewed by staff. 26 Chair Castro - Ramirez asked if there were any new modifications. None Motion by Commissioner Manlapaz to adopt Resolution 3191 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -15 as amended, seconded by Commissioner Patel. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 7 -0. Castro Ramirez- Approved West- Approved Araujo- Approved Enciso- Absent Manlapaz- Approved Patel- Approved Younger- Approved A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED TO, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -15 (AMEDMENT), TO DEVELOP A PARKING LOT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3000 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6169 - 003 -017 IN THE M (MANUFACTURING) ZONE, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ROLL CALL AYES: WEST, ARAU30, ENCISO, MANLAPAZ, PATEL, CASTRO RAMIREZ & YOUNGER NOES: ABSENT: ABSENT ABSTAIN: 27 Item #13: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -16 (Amendment) APPLICANT• Donald Chae 3160 Imperial Hwy APN 6169 - 003 -017 Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #13 and requested the staff report. Development Services Manager Colin presented the staff report and stated that the applicant was requesting approval to develop a multiple tenant retail "artisan facility" consisting of twenty-seven (27) tenant spaces within an existing building in an area totaling 3,360 square feet in the Plaza Mexico Shopping Center located at 3160 Imperial Highway in the CB1 (Planned Business) zone. Chair Castro - Ramirez opened the public hearing. Applicant Victor Gomez, 3100 E. Imperial Hwy, Lynwood, California presented renderings to the Planning Commission. He indicated that the project was located within a building adjacent to La Huasteca Restaurant. He further stated that Plaza Mexico has a great demand of artisans from Mexico which visit Plaza Mexico often. He also indicated that Plaza Mexico would like to help them be successful by renting them a permanent space. The artisan facility would be named "Casa de Artesanias". The "Casa de Artesanias" would only house artisans and Plaza Mexico would like to have tours for schools to learn about different cultures, and also for generating revenues for the artisans. He indicated that the spaces would be 10 feet by 10 feet, and there would be around 26 spaces. He indicated that artisans would work there, and that they come from different places in Mexico and South America. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested roll call. Motion by Commissioner Patel to adopt Resolution 3192 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2007 -16 as amended, seconded by Vice Chair West. Development Services Manager Colin called roll and the motion to approve passed 7 -0. Castro Ramirez- Approved - West- Approved Araujo- Approved 28 Enciso- Absent Manlapaz- Approved Patel- Approved Younger- Approved A RESOLUTION ENTITLED: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING CERTAIN FINDINGS RELATED TO, AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -16 (AMENDMENT), TO DEVELOP A MULTIPLE TENANT RETAIL "ARTISAN FACILITY" CONSISTING OF TWENTY -SEVEN TENANT SPACES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3160 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, IN THE CB -1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6169 - 003 -017 IN THE CB -1 (BUSINESS CONTROLLED) ZONE, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ROLL CALL AYES: WEST, ARAUJO, MANLAPAZ, PATEL, CASTRO RAMIREZ & YOUNGER NOES: ABSENT: ENCISO ABSTAIN: Item #10: General Plan Amendment No. 2007 -01: Housing Element APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Commissioner Enciso returned to the meeting. Chair Castro - Ramirez announced new public hearing agenda item #10 and requested the staff report. Development Services Manager Colin presented staff report, the item was continued from the last Planning Commission meeting; the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Housing Element on April 10 and May 8, and on June 2 there was a special meeting in which residents had the opportunity to identify issues, opportunities and resources, a brainstorming session was conducted where the Planning commission and the residents provided comments on a post it this was facilitated as well by the consultant. He further stated that the Planning Commission had reviewed and analyzed the draft Housing Element on June 12 29 2007. He also stated that after staff completes the draft Housing Element the document will be transmitted to the State Department of Housing for compliance and review. The document will be presented to the Planning Commission upon completion of the state review and then the document will come back with revision for the city to review and comply with state law. He further stated that staff will provide the Planning Commission and the City Council a draft before submittal to the State. Development services Manager Colin stated that he called the consultant to get a summary of the changes that were made to the draft Houising element, but that staff did not receive any call back as of the date of the meeting. However before former Director Taylor left, the consultant recommended that the Planning Commission review that document and allow staff the opportunity to send it to the State for review and once again when we get back the document, it will be prepared and presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council as well. At this time staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the draft Housing Element update accept public testimony, provide comments and recommendations. Chair Castro - Ramirez inquired if the consultant has provided the revise Housing Element with the input from the commission and the residents from the workshop conducted on a Saturday. Development Services Manager Colin responded from the last conversation some of the changes are reflected in the document but staff asked for a final version including a summary of the changes but unfortunately the consultant did not provide anything .yet. Chair Castro - Ramirez replied that she does not believe the changes were reflected because the document she has is the same as the one handed out in the last Planning Commission meeting and she does not feel comfortable sending the document to the State saying that the document received public comment and the comments has not been integrated into the document. She further indicated that if the consultant had not provided the updated document the item shall be continued until a revised draft was provided and to make sure that what we forward to the State includes the input. Commissioner Araujo inquired if there is a deadline for the submittal Counsel indicated that there is not a formal deadline but there is litigation pending. He further stated that the consultant said the changes were made but we have not received a summary from the consultant; he also pointed out that the sooner the better considering there is hearing on August 21 concerning the Housing Element and the city has to show the court that it is making progress revising the Housing Element. It will be wise to send it to the State to look it 30 over and provide the city with comments and then show the Court the city is making progress. Unintelligible Counsel replied that his understanding was that the changes had been already made but the City had not physically received them from the consultant. Unintelligible Development Services Manager Colin indicated that staff had attempted to contact the consultant with no responses and he would follow up the following day. Chair Castro inquired if it was necessary to have a special meeting. Unintelligible. Commissioner Araujo recommended to approve, and contact the consultant and send document to the State and let the State critique and provide comments. Chair Castro - Ramirez replied that the Planning Commission was very specific to inform the consultant that there were some errors in the document and there were also comments from the community and she felt uncomfortable sending an incomplete document to the State. Commissioner Manlapaz agreed with Chair Castro - Ramirez. Chair Castro- Ramirez indicated that if there was a deadline that the City needs to meet it may be possible to continue the item to the next Planning Commission meeting. Unintelligible Chair Castro - Ramirez requested to Development Service Manager Colin that if he received a copy of the corrected version of the Housing Element, to please call her up and set up a special meeting. By general consensus the item will be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting. 31 COMMISSION ORALS Commissioner Manlapaz thanked staff for their patience with the Planning Commissioners and said he appreciated the help. Commissioner Younger indicated that he thought the meeting was well done and congratulated the Planning Commission and commended Madam Chair on her job. Commissioner Encino unintelligible. Commissioner Araujo no comments. Commissioner Patel thanked staff for their hard work especially now that they are short handed. Vice Chair West thanked everybody for their patience and commented about the renderings and said he would bring a book for reference. Consultant Guerra offered to bring a report regarding the minimum requirements for the rendering. Chair Castro - Ramirez requested that staff and fellow commissioners refrain from talking when the speaker or staff is presenting a project to give a good impression to the audience. She requested an overview of the Brown Act and Ethics key elements for the next meeting and wanted suggestions on key tips of order. She also commended staff for their work and effort and at trying to maintain the Department together. STAFF ORALS Development Services Manager Jonathan Colin commented on how accustomed everybody was to former Director Grant Taylor, and commented everyone was used to being walked by the hand by him. He further stated that Grant Taylor was no longer here, and that now everyone needed to learn to walk, including the commissioners. He thanked staff and Planning Commissioners. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Castro - Ramirez, and second by Commissioner Manlapaz. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40pm. 32 AGENDA ITEM #8 GPA NO. 2007 -01 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE DATE: August 14, 2007 TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jonathan Colin, Development Services Manager SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 2007 -01 Lynwood Housing Element Update APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Proposal For the Lynwood Planning Commission, residents and general public to review and comment on the Administrative Draft Update to the Lynwood Housing Element. Background This item was continued from the last Planning Commission Meeting held July 10, 2007. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Administrative Draft Housing Element at their meetings of April 10 and May 8, 2007. On June 2, 2007 a Special Planning Commission meeting and community workshop were conducted to provide the public an opportunity to identify issues, and opportunities and available resources. Notice of the special meeting was published in the Lynwood Press for three consecutive weeks, placed on the City website, placed at the Lynwood Unified School District Offices and at the Los Angeles County Library and distributed to residents in the Lynwood N Perspective Newsletter Staff and David Barquist of RBF Consulting presented a powerpoint presentation consisting of the Housing Element purpose, required content, 1998 -2005 RHNA growth needs, legal requirements, policy issues, and other relevant components. A brainstorming session was conducted where the Planning Commission and public provided comments on post -it notes pertaining to challenges, opportunities and resources. Staff led a summary discussion with the Commission and the public. The Planning Commission reviewed and analyzed the Administrative Draft Housing Element Update on June 12, 2007. Discussion & Analysis Staff has reviewed and considered public comments received, and will complete the administrative Draft Housing Element document for transmittal to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for compliance review. The document will be presented again before the Planning Commission upon completion of HCD's review. HCD's review will indicate the revisions necessary to bring the City's 1998 -2005 Housing Element into compliance with state law. Staff will also provide the Planning Commission and City Council with the draft transmitted to HCD. Upon receipt of HCD's comments, a Public Review Draft will be prepared and the environmental documentation will be circulated for public comment. Environmental Review The Development Services Department and consultant have performed an Initial Study and determined that the project will not have significant impacts on the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the Administrative Draft Housing Element Update, accept public testimony, provide comments and recommendations. Attachments: Draft Housing Element M CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Background 1 -x B. Purpose and Content 1 -x C Relationship to Other Elements 1 -x D Use of Relevant and Current Data 1 -x E. Citizen Participation 1 -x F Review of Previous Element ... 1 -x CHAPTER 2.0: COMMUNITY PROFILE A. Population Trends and Characteristics 2 -x B Employment Trends 2 -x C Household Characteristics 2 -x D Housing Inventory and Market Conditions 2 -x CHAPTER 3.0: HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSIS A. Regional Housing Needs Assessment 3 -x B. Special Needs Groups 3 -x C Summary of Needs 3 -x CHAPTER 4.0: RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS A. Market Constraints 4 -x B Governmental Constraints 4 -x C Housing Resources ... 4 -x CHAPTER 5.0: POLICY PROGRAM A. Statewide Goals 5 -x B. City Goals and Programs 5 -x C Goal 1 5 -x D Goal ..... 5 -x E. Goal 3 5 -x F Goal 5 -x APPENDIX A: ADEQUATE SITES ANALYSIS APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF UNITS BUILT APPENDIX C: REVIEW OF PAST PERFORMANCE APPENDIX D: HISTORICAL SALES DATA APPENDIX E: COMMUNITY OUTREACH SUPPLEMENT Table of Contents CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1998 -2005 Housing Element provides for the identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and articulates the City's official policies for the preservation, conservation, improvement, and production of housing within the City of Lynwood. A. BACKGROUND Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires every city and county to adopt a Housing Element as a component to the General Plan. State law requires the Housing Element provide "an identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing." State law mandates the Housing Element "shall identify adequate sites for housing, including rental housing, factory-built housing, and mobile homes, and shall make adequate provision for the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community " .11*I * �l_1I lZrZeIztk1-1 The Housing Element for the 1998 -2005 Planning period has been prepared in compliance with State Housing Element law It examines the City of Lynwood's housing needs as they exist today, and projects future housing needs. It sets forth statements of community goals, objectives and policies concerning those needs, and it includes a housing program that responds to current and future needs within the limitations posed by available resources. The housing program details a 7 schedule of actions to achieve its goals and objectives. Upon its adoption by the Lynwood City Council, this updated Housing Element will serve as a comprehensive statement of the City's housing policies and as a specific guide for program actions to be taken in support of those policies. Page 1 -1 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT State law recognizes that housing needs may exceed available resources and, therefore, does not require that the City's quantified objectives be identical to the identified housing needs. This recognition of limitations is critical during this period of uncertainties in both the public and private sectors. Fiscal resources at all governmental levels are limited and uncertain and the private marketplace is undergoing substantial change. As a result, the methods for achieving the City of Lynwood's objectives, or the ability to meet them at all, as stated today, may be less relevant tomorrow or a year from tomorrow Therefore, it is intended that this housing element be reviewed annually and updated and modified not less than every 5 years in order to remain relevant and useful to decision - makers, the private sector, and the residents of the City C. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS AND PLANS The California Government Code requires internal consistency among the various elements of a General Plan. Section 65300.5 of the Government Code states that the General Plan's various Elements shall provide an integrated and internally consistent and compatible statement of policy City staff has reviewed the other elements of the General Plan and has determined that this Housing Element provides consistency with the other Elements of the General Plan. The City will maintain this consistency as future General Plan amendments are processed by evaluating proposed amendments for consistency with all elements of the General Plan. D. USE OF RELEVANT AND CURRENT DATA To properly understand housing, a complete review and analysis of the community's population characteristics and housing stock must be performed. The revised Housing Element has been supplemented with more current available data �and reflects changes in Housing Element Law since the receipt of the December 14. 2001 review letter. The 1998 -2005 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), formulated by the California Association of Governments (SCAG), was utilized at the direction of the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) The RHNA is the only model prepared by SCAG that disaggregates housing needs among all economic segment s of the community Finally, the data collected by various sources and utilized in the updating of this Housing Element may reflect totals which are not identical. In most ----------------- -- ----- respects, the totals are not as significant as the trends illustrated in the ----- data collected. However, where totals of population and housing counts were reported for the same period, they may have been adjusted to be consistent with the most valid source known. he most current as been include d as part of this revised Housin 9 Eleme nt. Page t -2 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT E. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION This Housing Element was developed through the combined efforts of City staff, the City's Planning Commission, the City Council, and the City's consultants, Wagner & Associates, Inc. and RBF Consulting. Citizen input was received through workshops and public hearings conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council. The notices for these workshops and hearings were published in a local newspaper and prominently posted at City Hall and other public facilities. In addition, organizations that represent the interests of lower income and special needs households, or are otherwise involved in the development of affordable housing, were consulted during the preparation of this Housing Element. These organizations include the Los Angeles Housing Authority, the local task force for ending homelessness, and non - profit housing corporations, as well as for - profit developers that have been active in developing or preserving affordable housing within the City As a supplement to the Citizen Participation program, a community workshop was held on Saturday July 2 2007 to provide additional opportunities for input by the Community. Due to the length of time that outreach was warranted. As part of this workshop, participants were asked to provide their input on the challenges, opportunities and resources related to Housing. These comments have been considered in the development of the Housing Policy Program provided in Chapter 5 of this document. A summary of this workshop is provided in Appendix E of this Housing Element. F. REVIEW OF PREVIOUS ELEMENT When preparing State mandated updates to the Housing Element, each local government is required to evaluate its progress toward achieving the goals contained in the previous housing element. This evaluation should include a discussion of the following: 1) the effectiveness of the housing element in the attainment of the State housing goal; 2) any analysis of the significant differences between what was projected and what was achieved; and 3) a description of how the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the updated element incorporate what has been learned from the results of the previous element. A more detailed review is provided in Appendix C of this Housing Element. Table 1 -1 Review of Previous Housinq Element Performance Housing Element Program I Review of Page 1 -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT 1 Density Bonus Program 10 per year No 2. Century Freeway Replacement 193 Units Yes 3 CDBG Rehabilitation 25 per year Yes 4 Section 8 10 per year additional 487 residents served 5. Demolition Control No set target 6. Code Enforcement No set target 7. Fair Housing Contract Yes 8. Elderly Housing 30 Units in 3 years No 9. Shared Housing No set tar et 10. Homeless Shelter 25 -30 persons per day Yes/Truevine This page intentionally left blank. Page 1 -4 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT CHAPTER 2 COMMUNITY PROFILE This section presents the demographic and housing characteristics that influence the demand and availability of housing in the City of Lynwood. The focus of this section is to identify the need for housing according to population demographics and housing stock characteristics. This analysis forms the basis for establishing programs and policies that address the identified needs of the community A. POPULATION TRENDS AND CHARACTERISTICS The City of Lynwood is one of 88 cities located in Los Angeles County Table 2 -1 Regional Population Trends 1990 -2005 County 1990 2000 2005 Imperial County 109,303 142,361 161,800 Los Angeles County 8,863,164 9,519,338 10,226,506 Orange ounty 2,410,556 2,846,289 3,056,865 Riverside County 1,170,413 1,545,387 1,877,000 San Bernardino County 1,418,380 1,709,434 1,946,202 San Diego County 2,498,016 2,813,833 3,051,280 Ventura County 1 669,016 1 753,197 1 813,052 Notes 'California Department of Finance Estimate, January 1, 2005. Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF 1, 1990 STF 1, and the California Department of Finance Growth trends show significant growth in the 1980s, followed by slower growth in the 1990s. As shown in Table 2 -2, from 1980 to 1990, the City's population increased by 27.5 %. By 2000, Lynwood's population reached 69,899 persons representing a 12.8% increase from 1990. This rate of growth has exceeded Los Angeles County as a whole for the past two decades. Page 2 -1 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -2 Population Growth 1980 -2000 Jurisdiction 1980 1990 2000 1980 -1990 Growth 1990 -2000 Growth Number % Number Lynwood 48,548 61,945 69,899 13,397 27.5% 7,954 12.8% Los Angeles Count 7,447,503 8,863,164 9,519,338 1,415,661 19.0% 656,174 74% Source: U.S Census 1980, U S Census 1990 STF3 P001, U S. Census 2000 SF3 P1 The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), as part of its mandated planning functions, is the lead agency for the development of regional population, employment and household forecasts. As shown in Figure 2 -1, the City's population is expected to increase by 17% and reach a total population of 81,551 in 2030. Figure 2 -1 Population Growth Forecast 1980 -2030 Source: U.S. Census SF3 P1, SCAG Population Projections 2004GF 1. Age Composition As shown in Table 2 -3, the working adults (25 -54 years) make up a significant percentage of the population (40.2% in 2000). From 1990 to 2000 the percentage of working adults and school age children increased, indicating an increase in the number of families with children in Lynwood. The senior citizen population decreased from 3,272 to 2,828 from 1990 to 2000, representing the smallest portion of Lynwood's population. Page 2 -2 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -3 Age Distribution 1990 -2000 Age Group 1990 2000 Number % of Po ulation' Number % of Population' Preschool 0 -4 ears 7,089 11.4% 7,420 10.6% School 5 -17 ears) 16,020 25.9% 19,132 274% Young Adult 18 -24 ears 8,841 14.3% 9,318 133% Prime Working 25 -54 ears 24,150 39.0% 28,092 40.2% Retirement 55 -64 ears 2,573 4.2% 3,069 4.4% Senior Citizen 65+ ears 3,272 5.3% 2,868 4.1 Total 61,945 100% 69,889 100% Notes: ' Percentages my not add up to 100% due to rounding. Source: U.S Census 1999 STF3 P013, U S. Census 2000 SF3 P8 2. Race and Ethnicity The Hispanic population is the largest representative ethnic group in the City, comprising 82.3% of the total population in 2000. As shown in Table 2 -4, the City experienced significant growth of its Hispanic population with an increase of 12% between 1990 and 2000. From 1990 to 2000, the percent of White, Black, Asian and other populations declined in the City as the Hispanic population grew Table 2 -4 Racial and Ethnic Composition 1990 -2000 Racial / Ethnic Group 1990 2000 1990 -2000 % Change Number % Number I % White 3,959 6.4% 2,044 29% -3.5% Black 13,009 21.0% 9,118 13.1% -7.9% American Indian & Alaska Native 112 0.2% 103 0.1% -0.1% Asian or Pacific Islander 1,066 1.7% 718 1.0% -0.7% Hispanic 43,565 70.3% 57,503 82.3% +12.0% Other 234 0.4% 50 0.1 % 0.3% Two or more races 309 0.4% 1 +0.4 °0 Total 1 61,945 1 100% 1 69,845 1 100% 1 - -- Notes ' The "Population of two or more races" category has been added in 2000 U.S. Census Data may not be comparable. Source: U.S. Census 1990 STF 1, P010 and U S. Census 2000 SF1, P8 Page 2 -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT B. EMPLOYMENT TRENDS Housing needs are affected by employment trends. Significant employment opportunities within the City can lead to growth in the demand for housing with a close proximity to jobs. Additionally, the quality and pay of available employment can aid in determining the type and prices of housing needed. As shown in Table 2 -5, the largest numbers of Lynwood's residents in 2000 were employed within the educational, health, and social service industry, representing 18.3% of the population, followed by the professional, scientific, managements, administrative and waste management service industries and retail trade. While only 0.3% of Lynwood's residents were in the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining industries. Table 2 -5 Emplovment by Industrv' Miss: ' Data cited are for the Lynwood population, and does not represent the number of lobs In Lynwood. Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 DP -3 Employment rates are an indicator of economic trend in the City Table 2- 6 shows unemployment rates as a percentage of the total labor force in Lynwood. In general Lynwood's labor force has grown from 2000 -2005, Page 2 -4 Lynwood Los Angeles Count Industry Em to ees % Em to ees % Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 87 0.4% 10,188 0.3% Construction 1,141 5.4% 202,829 5.1% Manufacturing 5,550 26.4% 586,627 14.8% Wholesale trade 1,371 6.5% 184,369 47% Retail trade 2,394 11.4% 416,390 10.5% Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 1,503 7.2% 198,375 5.0% Information 400 1.9% 213,589 5.4% Finance, insurance, real estate, and rental and leasing 765 3.6% 272,304 6.9% Professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management services 1,444 6.9% 455,069 11.5% Educational, health and social services 2,872 13.7% 722,792 18.3% Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food services 1,515 7.2% 332,753 8.4% Other services (except public administration ) 1,378 6.6% 233,193 5.9% Public administration 578 2.8% 124,937 3.2% Total 20,998 100% 3,953,415 100% Miss: ' Data cited are for the Lynwood population, and does not represent the number of lobs In Lynwood. Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 DP -3 Employment rates are an indicator of economic trend in the City Table 2- 6 shows unemployment rates as a percentage of the total labor force in Lynwood. In general Lynwood's labor force has grown from 2000 -2005, Page 2 -4 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT although the City did see a slight rates increased from 8.2% to 11 1 declined to 8.5% from 2003 to 2005 drop from 2003 -2004 Unemployment % between 2000 and 2003, and then Table 2 -6 Labor Force Trends 2000 -2005 Year Labor Force Employment Unemployment Unemployment Rate 2000 25,700 23,500 2,200 8.6% 2001 26,200 23,800 2,400 91% 2002 26,400 23,600 2,800 10.8% 2003 26,500 23,600 2,900 111% 2004 26,400 23,700 2,700 10.4% 2005 1 26,500 1 24,200 2,300 8.5% Source State of California Employment Development Department (EDO), 2005 C. HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS Before future needs can be anticipat and trends need to be identified. This size, household growth, and income t definition a "household" consists of al unit, whether or not they are relate apartment is a household, just as a unrelated tenant living in the Sam household. ed, current housing characteristics section is an analysis of household rends in the City of Lynwood. By I the people occupying a dwelling d. A single person living in an couple with two children and an e dwelling unit is considered a Household Formation and Composition According to U.S. Census data, Lynwood in 2000. As shown in Tabl in Lynwood increased by 0.6% from Angeles County and the State of percent increase in the number of county -wide households increased by increased by 10 7 %. there were 14,432 households in e 2 -7, the number of total households 1990 to 2000. In comparison to Los California, this is a relatively small total households. The number of 4 7 %, while California's households Table 2 -7 Total Households 1990 -2000 Area 1990 2000 Percentlncrease 1990 -2000 Lynwood 14,348 14,432 0.6% Los Angeles Count 2,994,343 3,136,279 4.7% California 10,399,700 11,512,020 1 10.7% Source: U S. Census 1990 STF3, U S. Census 2000 SF3 Page 2 -5 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT According to data from the U S Census and the Department of Finance, the average household size in Lynwood is growing. In 2000, the average household size was 4 7 persons per household and by 2006 that number grew to 4 92 persons per household. This is significantly higher than the countywide average of 3.12 persons per household. As shown in Table 2 -9, over 80% of Lynwood's households were occupied by three or more persons in 2000 In addition, approximately 48% of the total housing units were occupied by 5 or more persons. Of those households, approximately 55% own their home and 45% are renters. Table 2 -9 Household Size Distribution 2000 Household Size Total Households' % of Total Renter Households % of Totaf Owner Households % of Total 1 Person 1,099 7.6% 668 46% 431 3.0% 2 Persons 1,657 11.5% 869 60% 788 5.5% 3 -4 Persons 4,804 33.3% 2,972 20.6% 1,832 12.7% 5+ Persons 6,854 47.6% 3,115 21.6% 3,739 25.9% Total 14,414 100% 7,624 52.9% 6,790 471% Notes: ' Represents Total Households P Percent of Total Households Source U.S. Census 2000, SF3 H.17 2. Jobs to Housing Balance An imbalance between the location of housing and the location of jobs is an indicator of housing affordability and local job availability One way of determining if Lynwood's households commute out of the City to work is looking at the jobs to household balance. The jobs to housing balance is the number of jobs in Lynwood divided by the number of households. In 2000, Lynwood had a relatively high jobs- housing balance with 1.63 jobs to every household in the City Page 2 -6 Table 2 -8 Average Household Size 2000 -2006 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -f0 Jobs- Household Ratio Source: Employment Development Department 2000, U S. Census 2000 SF 3 3. Household Income The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) develops an annual median family income (MFI) for the purpose of determining eligibility for certain housing programs. According to HUD, the 2000 HUD MFI for Los Angeles County $52,100 As part of this Housing Element, the 2000 HUD MFI is used to assist in calculating housing needs during the planning period. In determining guidelines for housing affordability, the State of California uses the following income categories: • Extremely Low Income — Less than 30% of the median income. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering • Very-Low Income — Less than 50% of the median income; • Low - income — Between 51% and 80% of the median income, • Moderate - income — Between 81% and 120% of the median income, and; • Above- moderate income — Greater than 120% of the median income. Table 2 -11 provides a summary of income ranges for each affordability category, based on the 2000 HUD MFI for the City of Lynwood. Table 2 -11 Household Income Distribution Income Category 2000 Employment 23,500 Households 14,414 Jobs per Household Ratio 1.63 Source: Employment Development Department 2000, U S. Census 2000 SF 3 3. Household Income The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) develops an annual median family income (MFI) for the purpose of determining eligibility for certain housing programs. According to HUD, the 2000 HUD MFI for Los Angeles County $52,100 As part of this Housing Element, the 2000 HUD MFI is used to assist in calculating housing needs during the planning period. In determining guidelines for housing affordability, the State of California uses the following income categories: • Extremely Low Income — Less than 30% of the median income. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering • Very-Low Income — Less than 50% of the median income; • Low - income — Between 51% and 80% of the median income, • Moderate - income — Between 81% and 120% of the median income, and; • Above- moderate income — Greater than 120% of the median income. Table 2 -11 provides a summary of income ranges for each affordability category, based on the 2000 HUD MFI for the City of Lynwood. Table 2 -11 Household Income Distribution Income Category Percent of County Median Income Ran a .$ ExtremeFy Low Income <30% <$15,630 Very-Low Income < 50% < $ 26,050 Low - income 51%-80% $ 26,051 - $ 41,680 Moderate Income 81% -120% $ 41,681 - $ 62,520 Above - moderate Income >120% > $ 62,520 1-- . Formatted Notes: ' Based on HCD income categories P Based on 2000 HUD MFI of $52,100 for the Los Angeles -Long Beach PMSA 3 Based on requirements of AB 2634, the extremely low income category is considered Page 2 -7 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -12 shows household income distribution by tenure. Table 2 -12 Household Income by Tenure in 1999 Notes: 'Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding Source. U.S. Census 2000 SF3 HCT11 The median income in Lynwood in 2000 was $35,432, which is considerably lower than the county median of $42,030. Lynwood's renter - occupied households tend to have a lower income with the median of $25,596, whereas owner - occupied households have a median income which is higher than that of the city -wide median at $48,346 per year Table 2 -13 2000 Median Income by Tenure Jurisdiction Owner- Occupied Renter- Occupied Total Occupied Housina Units Number % Number % Number $42,030 Less than $5,000 147 2.2% 544 7.1% 691 4.8% $5,000 to $9,999 139 2.0% 715 9.4% 854 5.9% $10,000 to $14,999 224 3.3% 829 10.9 0 /b 1,073 74% $15,000 to $19,999 265 3.9% 857 11.2% 1,122 7.8% $20,000 to $24,999 348 5.1% 747 9.8% 1,095 7.6% $25,000 to $34,999 863 12.7% 1,411 18.5% 2,274 15.8% $35,000 to $49,999 1,518 22.4% 1,393 18.3% 2,911 20.2% $50,000 to $74,999 1,748 25.7% 766 10.0% 2,514 17.4% $75,000 to $99,999 939 13.8% 239 3.1% 1,178 8.2% $100,000 to $149,999 515 7.6% 66 0.9% 581 4.0% $150,000 or more 64 09% 57 0.7% 121 0.8% Total 6,790 100% 7,624 100% 14,414 1 100% Notes: 'Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding Source. U.S. Census 2000 SF3 HCT11 The median income in Lynwood in 2000 was $35,432, which is considerably lower than the county median of $42,030. Lynwood's renter - occupied households tend to have a lower income with the median of $25,596, whereas owner - occupied households have a median income which is higher than that of the city -wide median at $48,346 per year Table 2 -13 2000 Median Income by Tenure Jurisdiction Median Income City of Lynwood $35,432 Owner-Occupied Households $48,346 Renter-Occupied Households $25,596 Los Angeles County $42,030 Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 HCT12 D. HOUSING INVENTORY AND MARKET CONDITIONS This section summarizes conditions of the City's housing stock and analyzes current market trends. Current housing trends must be understood before anticipating future housing needs. , 1. Housing Stock Profile Page 2 -8 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -14 shows Lynwood's housing stock compared to Los Angeles County U S Census data indicates there were a total of 15,004 housing units in the City in 2000 While the number of housing units in Lynwood has increased by 479 units from 1990 to 2000, the City continues to represent 0.5% of Los Angeles County's housing stock. Table 2 -14 Housing Inventory Lynwood and Los Angeles County 1990 and 2000 t. 2411[ �I+ Yl�A7 l�i�LFY�b' 11' 1. 11.7 �1�1LL�1�lR�d�14aLLYrbY4�1�1�D�lil In 2000, the majority of housing units in the City of Lynwood were single family detached, representing 54.5% of the total housing stock. According to the U S. Census, single family detached housing units fell from 8,321 units to 8,180 units from 1990 to 2000. This was a result of the acquisitions necessary as part of the 105 Freeway through the City of Lynwood. Additionally, single family attached housing units, multi - family housing units, and mobile -homes all increased from 1990 to 2000 Table 2 -15 identifies Lynwood's housing units by type in 1990 and 2000 Table 2 -15 Housing Inventory by Unit Type 1990 -2000 Housing Type 1990 Los Angeles Lyn wood as Year Lynwood County % of the 8,180 54.5% Single Family, attached Region 1990 14,525 3,163,343 0.5% 2000 15,004 3,270,909 0.5% t. 2411[ �I+ Yl�A7 l�i�LFY�b' 11' 1. 11.7 �1�1LL�1�lR�d�14aLLYrbY4�1�1�D�lil In 2000, the majority of housing units in the City of Lynwood were single family detached, representing 54.5% of the total housing stock. According to the U S. Census, single family detached housing units fell from 8,321 units to 8,180 units from 1990 to 2000. This was a result of the acquisitions necessary as part of the 105 Freeway through the City of Lynwood. Additionally, single family attached housing units, multi - family housing units, and mobile -homes all increased from 1990 to 2000 Table 2 -15 identifies Lynwood's housing units by type in 1990 and 2000 Table 2 -15 Housing Inventory by Unit Type 1990 -2000 Housing Type 1990 % of Total 2000 % of Total Single Famil , detached 8,321 57.3% 8,180 54.5% Single Family, attached 1,072 7.4% 1,679 11.2% Multi-Family 4,902 33.7% 5,033 33.5% Mobile -homes 58 0.4% 101 0.7% Other Boats, RV, Etc 172 1.2% 11 0.1% Total Housing 14,525 100% 15,004 100% Sources U.S. uensus 188U S I h3 HUZU, u 5. census ZUUU Sri H3u a. Unit Size As shown in Table 2 -16, 32.2% of occupied housing units contain 5 or more bedrooms, 19.9% contain 2 bedrooms, 19.7% contain 3 bedrooms, 19% contain 4 bedrooms, and 9% contain 1 bedroom. Data from the 2000 U.S. Census shows 50.9% of owner- occupied housing units consist of five or more units, compared to only 15.6% of renter - occupied housing units. Renter - occupied housing units tend to be smaller, generally 2 to 4- bedrooms. Page 2 -9 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -16 Unit Size by Tenure Unit Size Owner- Occu pied Renter- Occupied Total Occupied Housing Units Units % Units %I Units % Studio/ 1 bedroom 91 1.3% 1,255 165% 1,346 9.3% 2 bedrooms 1,130 16.6% 1,739 22.8% 2,869 19.9% 3bedrooms 1,205 177% 1,641 21.5% 2,846 19.7% 4 bedrooms 907 13.4% 1 1,800 23.6% 2 18.8% 5 or more bedrooms 3,457 50.9% 1 1,189 15.6% 4,646 32.2% Total 6,790 100%7 7,624 100% 1 14,414 100% Notes: ' Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 H26 b. Unit Type Of Lynwood's occupied housing units in 2000, 55.1% were single - family, detached. As shown in Table 2 -17, over 86% of owner- occupied housing units were single - family, compared to 27.2% of the renter - occupied housing units. Table 2 -17 Unit Type by Tenure Unit Type Owner- Occu ied Renter- Occup Total Occupied Housing Units Units % Units % Units Single Family detached 5,866 86.4% 2,071 27.2% 7,937 551% Single Family, attached 631 9.3% 998 13.1% 1,629 11.3% Multi-family 2 -4 units 206 3.0% 1,384 18.2% 1,410 9.8% Multi-family (5+ units) 35 0.5% 3,136 41.1% 3,171 22.0% Mobile Homes 52 0.8% 35 0.5% 87 0.6% Other Boats, RV, Etc 0 0 0 Total 6,790 100% 7,624 100% 14,414 100% Notes: ' Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 H32 Page 2 -10 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT 2. Tenure As shown in Table 2 -18, Housing units be tenure in the City of Lynwood consist of 47 1 % owner - occupied units and 52.9% renter - occupied units Comparatively, owner - occupied housing units in Los Angeles County represented 47.9% of total households. However, there were significantly more owner - occupied housing units statewide (56.9 %) than in Lynwood and the County Table 2 -18 Occupied Units by Tenure Notes: ' Percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding. Source: U S. Census 2000 H7 3. Vacancy Rates Vacancy rates are a measure of the general availability of housing. It also indicates how well the type of available units meet the housing demand market. A low vacancy rate suggests that households may have difficulty finding housing within their price range, where as a high vacancy rate indicates that either the units available are undesirable or there is an oversupply of housing units. The availability of vacant housing units provides households with choices in the type and price of a unit that accommodates their specific needs. Low vacancy rates can result in higher prices and limit households in finding adequate housing. It may also contribute to overcrowding. A vacancy rate of 5% is considered normal enough to minimize prices pressure on rents. As shown in Table 2 -19, 3.9% of Lynwood's housing units were vacant at the time of the 2000 U.S. Census. This vacancy rate is lower than the County as a whole with a 4.2% vacancy rate. Table 2 -19 Occupancy Status by Tenure 2000 Occupancy Status Owner -Occu ied Renter -Occu ied Total 14,414 Number % Number % Number 15,004 Lynwood 6,790 47.1 ° /a 7,624 52.9% 14,414 100% Los Angeles County 1,499,694 47.9% 1,635,080 52.2% 3,133,774 100% California 6,546,237 56.9% 4,956,633 43.1% 11,502,870 100% Notes: ' Percentages may not equal 100 due to rounding. Source: U S. Census 2000 H7 3. Vacancy Rates Vacancy rates are a measure of the general availability of housing. It also indicates how well the type of available units meet the housing demand market. A low vacancy rate suggests that households may have difficulty finding housing within their price range, where as a high vacancy rate indicates that either the units available are undesirable or there is an oversupply of housing units. The availability of vacant housing units provides households with choices in the type and price of a unit that accommodates their specific needs. Low vacancy rates can result in higher prices and limit households in finding adequate housing. It may also contribute to overcrowding. A vacancy rate of 5% is considered normal enough to minimize prices pressure on rents. As shown in Table 2 -19, 3.9% of Lynwood's housing units were vacant at the time of the 2000 U.S. Census. This vacancy rate is lower than the County as a whole with a 4.2% vacancy rate. Table 2 -19 Occupancy Status by Tenure 2000 Occupancy Status Units Percent Occupied Housing Units 14,414 96.1% Vacant Housing Units 591 3.9% Total Housing Units 15,004 100% Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 H6 Page 2 -11 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT 4. Age of Housing Stock Table 2 -20 shows the age of the City's housing stock as reported in the 2000 U.S Census. Age is one way to measure housing stock conditions and a factor in determining the need for rehabilitation. Without proper maintenance housing units deteriorate over time. Thus units that are older are more likely to need major repairs and rehabilitation. In addition, older housing units may not be built to current fire standards and building codes. In general, housing over 30 years are more likely to experience deferred maintenance issues and may need minor repairs. Housing over 50 years old is considered aged and are more likely to need major repairs. In Lynwood, approximately 76.9% of housing units were built prior to 1970 and 37 1% were built prior to 1950. This indicates that a considerable amount of the City's current housing is at an age that typically requires maintenance. Table 2 -20 Age of Housing Stock by Year Built Year Built Units Percent 1999 - March 2000 114 0.8% 1995-1998 123 0.8% 1990-1994 409 2.7% 1980-1989 893 6.0% 1970-1979 1,936 12.9% 1960-1969 2,816 18.8% 1950-1959 3,955 26.4% 1940-1949 3,238 21.6% 1939 or earlier 1,520 10.1% Total Housing Units 15,004 100% Notes: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Source: U.S. Census SF3 H34 In terms of the tenure by age of housing stock, the majority (approximately 76.1 %) of owner - occupied units were constructed prior to 1960, whereas 42.9% of renter - occupied housing units were constructed prior to 1960. Page 2 -12 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -21 Tenure by Age of Housing Stock, Year Built Owner-Occupied Renter- Occupied Total Units Percent Units Percent Units Percent 1999 - March 2000 89 1.3% 25 0.3% 114 0.8% 1995-1998 33 0.5% 84 1.1% 123 0.8% 1990-1994 85 13% 313 41% 409 2.7% 1980- 1989 270 4.0% 583 7.6% 893 6.0% 1970-1979 385 5.7% 1,492 222% 1,936 12.9% 1960- 1969 759 11.2% 1,886 24.7% 2,816 18.8% 1950-1959 2,121 31.2% 1,735 22.8% 3,955 26.4% 1940-1949 2,193 32.3% 885 11.6% 3,238 21.6% 1939 or earlier 855 12.6% 651 1 8.5% 1,520 10.1% Total 6,790 100% 7,624 100% 15,004 100% Notes. ' Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Source: U.S. Census SF3 H36 5. Housing Conditions A housing unit is considered substandard if any of the following conditions exists. • Inadequate sanitation • Structural hazards • Nuisances • Faulty weather protection • Fire hazards • Inadequate maintenance • Overcrowding • Hazardous wiring, plumbing and /or mechanical equipment In 1990, the Census indicated that a total of 2,483 units were reported as substandard. The following Table 2 -22 reflects the City's housing stock conditions: Table 2 -22 City of Lynwood Housing Stock Condition - 1990 Units Owner Occupied I Renter Occupied Total Total Dwelling Units 7,238 7,282 14,250 Substandard Units 1,237 1,246 2,483 Suitable for Rehab 977 984 1,961 Need Replacement 260 262 522 Source Citv of Lvnwood 1991 Housino Assistance Plan Based on overall improved economic conditions, work by the Redevelopment Agency and visual observations of the City by City staff of improvements to housing over the last 10 years, it is estimated that the Page 2 -13 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT number of substandard units has been reduced to 2,200, that units suitable for rehabilitation have been reduced to 1,800, and units in need of replacement have been reduced to 450 units. 6. Housing Costs and Rents This section discusses the price of new and existing homes as well as the average cost of rental housing in Lynwood. a. New and Resale Housing The 2000 U S. Census lists the median value for all owner - occupied housing units in Lynwood at $147,300. Table 2 -22 shows the value of all owner - occupied housing units in Lynwood as of 2000 Approximately 84.5% of all owner- occupied housing units range from $100,000 to $199,000 in value. Table 2 -22 zuuu vatue Tor owner -vccu tea noustn unirs Price Range Number of Units Percent of Total $49,999 or less 180 2.6% $50,000 to $99,999 313 4.6% $100,000 to $149,000 3157 46.5% $150,000 to $199,000 2577 38.0% $200,000 to $249,000 301 44% $250,000 to $299,000 193 2.8% $300,000 to $399,000 21 0.3% $400,000 to $499,000 8 0.1% $500,000 or more 40 0.6% Total 6,790 100% Source U.S. Census 2000. SF 3. H84 Since the 2000 Census, Lynwood, along with many cities in the SCAG region, have experienced extensive growth in median sales prices. Table 2 -23 Median Sales Price Jurisdiction July 2005 July 2006 % Change Lynwood $389,000 $479,500 23.3% Downey $545,000 $600,000 10.1% Huntington Park $360,000 $431,000 197% Paramount $367,500 $397,500 8.2% Compton $320,000 $399,500 24.8% Los Angeles County $522,500 $485,000 77% Source. Gahtornia Association of Healtors, Jury 2006. Table 2 -23 shows the median sales prices for resale housing in the City of Lynwood and surrounding jurisdictions. In July 2006, the median cost of resale housing in Lynwood was $479,500, which was a 23.3% increase from July 2005. Data shows that median sales prices in surrounding jurisdictions are as high as $600,000 in Downey and as low as $399,500 in Compton. Page 2 -14 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT b. Rental Prices According to the U S. Census, the median gross rent in Lynwood was $629 in 2000. Table 2 -24 shows gross monthly rent by number of bedroom. Table 2 -24 Monthly Rent by Number of Bedrooms Source: U.S. census 2000 6F3 H61 As shown in Table 2 -25, over one fourth of Lynwood's households pay 50% or more for rent. Table 2 -25 Gross Rent as a Percentaqe of Household Income in 1999 Percent of Household Income Studio 1- bedroom 2- bedrooms 3 or more bedrooms Total Less than $200 12 54 33 6 105 $200 to $299 12 36 39 23 110 $300 to $499 503 555 105 25 1,188 $500 to $749 881 1,685 1,390 226 4,182 $750 to $999 134 388 606 344 1,472 $1000 or more 35 71 117 182 405 Total 1,577 2,789 2,290 816 7,472 Source: U.S. census 2000 6F3 H61 As shown in Table 2 -25, over one fourth of Lynwood's households pay 50% or more for rent. Table 2 -25 Gross Rent as a Percentaqe of Household Income in 1999 Percent of Household Income Number of Households Percent of Households Less than 10 percent 265 3.5% 10 to 14 percent 712 9.4% 15 to 19 percent 947 12.5% 20 to 24 percent 997 13.1% 25 to 29 percent 707 9.3% 30 to 34 percent 657 8.6% 35 to 39 percent 471 6.2% 40 to 49 percent 706 9.3% 50 percent or more 1,791 23.6% Not computed 350 4.6% Total 7,603 100% 2000 SF3 H69 C. Affordability Gap Analysis The cost of home ownership and renting can be compared to a household's ability to pay for housing. Housing affordability is defined as paying no more than 30% of the household income on housing expenses. Based on the 2000 HUD median family income, Table 2 -24 identifies affordable rent payments and purchase prices from each income category Page 2 -15 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 2 -26 Affordable Rent and Purchase Price By Income Categor Income Annual Affordable Estimated Category Income' Rent Affordable a Payment` Purchase Price Ver Income <50 %MFI <$651 <$98,000 Low- Income 51% - 80% MFI $652 - $1,042 $98,000 - $156,000 Moderate Income 81 %- 120 %MFI $1,043 - $1,563 $157,000 - $235,000 Above - moderate >120% MFI > $1,563 ,> $235,000 Income ' Income limits established by State of California HCD. 3 Based on 30% of income 3 Assumes 7°o interest rate, 30 year mortgage " MFI= 2000 HUD Median Family Income ($52,100) Page 2 -16 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT CHAPTER 3 HOUSI NEEDS ANALYSIS Several factors will influence the degree of demand, or "need," for new housing in Lynwood in the near future. The four major "needs" categories considered in this element include • Housing needs resulting from population growth, both in the City and the surrounding region; • Housing needs resulting from overcrowding; • Housing needs that result when households are paying more than they can afford for housing; and, • Housing needs of "special needs groups" such as elderly, large families, female- headed households, households with a disabled person, and the homeless. A. REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT California's Housing Element law requires that each city and county develop local housing programs designed to meet its `lair share" of existing and future housing needs for all income groups, as determined by the jurisdiction's Council of Governments, when preparing the state - mandated Housing Element of its General Plan. This "fair share" allocation concept seeks to ensure that each jurisdiction accepts responsibility for the housing needs of not only its resident population, but also for those households who might reasonably be expected to reside within the jurisdiction, particularly lower income households. This assumes the availability of a variety and choice of housing accommodations appropriate to their needs. The City of Lynwood is a member government of the Southern California Association of Page 3 -1 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Governments (SCAG), which prepared a Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) in 1999 that quantifies the existing and growth needs for housing in Lynwood. Existing Needs The portion of the RHNA dealing with existing housing needs addresses two conditions that can create housing demand: overpayment and overcrowding. a. Households Overpaying for Housing A household is considered to be overpaying for housing when more than 30% of the household's gross income goes toward paying for shelter A high cost of housing eventually causes fixed - income, elderly, and lower income families to use a disproportionate percentage of their income for housing. This may cause a series of related financial problems which may result in a deterioration of housing stock, because costs associated with home maintenance must be sacrificed for more immediate needs (e.g. food, clothing, medical care, and utilities). It may also result in the selection of inappropriately sized housing units that do not meet the space or amenity needs of the household. Table 3 -1, based on data from the 1999 SCAG RHNA, shows the number and percentage of owners and renters in four income groups who experience overpayment. Table 3 -1 City of Lynwood Overpayment by Tenure and Income % of Median Income Owners Renters Total House- holds % Overpaying House- holds % Overpaying House- holds % Overpayin <50% 1,160 55.4% 2,942 76.8% 4,102 69.2% 50 — 80% 930 56.8% 503 23.4% 1,433 37.9% 80 — 95% 272 40.0% 52 10.5% 324 27.6% > 95% 337 13.5% 26 2.7% 363 10.5% Total 2,699 39.1 % 3,523 47 4% 6,222 43.4% Source: Regional Housing Needs Assessment, SLAG 1999 Assumes 50% of the Very Low income group is considered Extremely Low income. The population with the highest percentage of overpayment identified in Table 3 -1 is renter households in the Very -Low Income category In this category, 76.8% households are overpaying for housing. Among Very- Low Income households that own their housing, 55.4% experience overpayment. This means that 69.2% of all Very -Low Income households report overpayment problems. In the income categories above Very -Low Income, renter households experience lower percentages of overpayment than owner households. Page 3 -2 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT For instance, 23.4% of Low - income renter households report overpayment problems, compared to 56.8% of Low Income owner households. In the households earning 80% to 95% of median income, 10 5% of renter households and 40% of owner households report overpayment problems. Overall, 47 4% of renter households experience overpayment, compared to 39 1% of owner households. b. Overcrowding In response to higher housing prices, lower- income households are often forced to accept smaller housing units, which may result in overcrowding. Overcrowding places a strain on housing units and the delivery of public services, eventually contributing to the deterioration of the housing stock and neighborhoods. A household is considered overcrowded when the number of people exceeds the number of rooms in the housing unit. Overcrowding is often reflective of one of three conditions: 1) a family or household is living in a dwelling that is too small; 2) a family chooses to house extended family members (i.e., grandparents or grown children and their families living with parents, called "doubling"), or 3) a family is renting living space to non - family members. Table 3 -2 City of Lynwood Overcrowding bV Tenure and Income % of Median Income Owners Renters Total House- holds % House- holds % House - holds % <50% 722 34.5% 1,987 51.9% 2,709 45.7% 50-80% 856 52.3% 1,177 54.8% 2,033 53.8% 80-95% 283 41.6% 317 63.9% 600 51.0% > 95% 736 28.3% 361 377% 1,097 31.8% Total 2,597 37.6% 3,842 51.7% 1 6,439 44.9% Source. Regional Housing Needs Assessment, SCAG 1999 Assumes 505 of the Very Low income category are Extremely Low Income. Table 3 -2 shows the number and percentage of owners and renters in four income groups who experience overcrowding, as reported in the 1999 SCAG RHNA. In every income category, renter households experience higher rates of overcrowding than owner households. Rates of overcrowding in renter households increase from 51.9% of very -low income households, to 54.8% of low- income households, to 63.9% of households earning 80 -95% of area median income. In renter households earning over 95% of area median income, 37 7% experience overcrowding. Overall, 517% of renter households experience overcrowding, and 37.6% of owner households. 2. 1998 -2005 Growth Needs The fair share allocation process begins with the State Department of Finance's projection of total statewide housing demand, which is then Page 3 -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT apportioned by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) among each of the State's official regions. The regions are represented by an agency typically termed a Council of Governments, or COG In the six county Southern California region, which includes Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, and Imperial Counties, the agency responsible for assigning these fair share targets to each jurisdiction is SCAG. In this RHNA cycle, SCAG coordinated with the Gateway Cities COG, the subregional council for southeast Los Angeles County jurisdictions. The final fair share allocations were approved by SCAG in November of 2000 In the process of making jurisdiction- specific allocations, SCAG and the Subregional Councils of Governments must consider a variety of factors, including market demand for housing, employment opportunities, commuting patterns, and the availability of suitable sites and public facilities. A local jurisdiction's 'lair share" of regional housing need is the number of additional dwelling units needed to accommodate the anticipated growth in the number of households, to replace expected demolitions and conversion of housing units to non - housing uses, and to achieve a future vacancy rate that allows for the healthy functioning of the housing market. Total housing need is then allocated to four income categories used in Federal and State programs: Very -Low, Low, Moderate, and Above - Moderate Income, defined operationally as earning up to 50 %, 51% to 80 %, 81% to 120 %, and more than 120% of the Los Angeles -Long Beach Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA) median income, respectively The allocations are further adjusted to avoid an over - concentration of lower income households in any one jurisdiction. Each jurisdiction's future housing need is estimated in terms of four factors: (1) the number of units needed to accommodate forecasted household growth; (2) the number of units needed to replace demolitions due to attrition in the housing stock (i.e., fire damage, obsolescence, redevelopment and conversions to non - housing uses), (3) maintaining an ideal vacancy rate for a well- functioning housing market; and (4) an adjustment to avoid an over- concentration of lower- income households in any one jurisdiction. As shown in Table 3 -3, Lynwood's total fair share allocation is 979 new housing units. Table 3 -3 City of Lynwood Fair Share Housina Needs Allocation. 1998 -2005 Source. Regional Housing Needs Allocation, SCAG 1999 Page 3 -4 Total Above - Construction Very -Low Low Moderate Moderate Need Income Income Income Income Number of Units 979 277 175 191 335 Source. Regional Housing Needs Allocation, SCAG 1999 Page 3 -4 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT B. SPECIAL NEEDS GROUPS 1. Elderly Persons Many elderly have special housing needs due to fixed incomes and limited mobility Housing construction and location are important considerations for this population. The elderly often require ramps, handrails, and lower cupboards and counters to allow greater access and mobility They also may desire special security devices for their homes to allow greater self - protection. To compensate for limited mobility, their housing should be located within easy walking distance of the services that meet their needs, such as medical or shopping facilities, or should be served by public transit. The special needs of the elderly can be summarized in the following: • Income — The elderly population typically lives on fixed incomes; • Household Composition — Elderly women often live alone; • Transportation — The elderly population is more likely to utilize public transportation; and, • Health Care — The elderly have a greater need for health care. The median age in the SCAG region was 32.3 in 2000, and is projected to increase to 36.1 by 2030 Over the next 25 years, SCAG is projecting a growth in the 65 and other age group Approximately one in six people in the region is expected to be a senior citizen compared to one in ten in 2004 ' As shown in Table 3 -4, 1,154 elderly householders reside in Lynwood, which is 8.0% of the total households. Of the 1,154 senior households, 320 were renters (4.2 %) and 834 were owners (12.3 %) Further, 1 0% (147) households of the householders over the age of 65 were under the poverty level in 1999 ' Southern California Association of Governments, Community Development Division. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan/ Growth Vision: Socio- economic Forecast Report. June 2004. Page 3 -5 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 3 -4 Householders by Tenure and Age 2000 Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 H14 Another factor to consider in the elderly population is the percent of elderly women living alone According to 2000 U.S. Census data 5.9% of Lynwood's 15- to 64- year -olds and 5.8% of elderly men live alone, while 17 1 % of elderly women live alone. Table 3 -5 shows the extent of disabilities experienced by the elderly population, which may limit their ability to live independently An individual j with a "going outside the home disability" has a condition lasting 6 months or more that makes it difficult to go outside the home alone to shop or visit a doctor's office. An individual with a "self -care disability" has a condition lasting 6 months or more that makes it difficult to dress, bathe, or get around inside the home. According to 2000 U S. Census data, approximately a quarter (25.9 %) of the elderly population in Lynwood has at least one of these types of disability Among elderly women, 30 6% are reported to have at least one of these types of disability Elderly men and women experience a "going outside the home" disability at similar rates: 11.8% and 11.3 %, respectively Self -care disabilities occur in elderly women at a rate of 19.3% and in elderly men at a rate of 6.3 %. In both groups, self -care disabilities are accompanied by at least one other kind of disability Table 3 -5 City of Lynwood Elderly With Disabilities Limiting Independent Living Owner- Occupied Renter - Occupied Total Householder Age Units % Units % Units % 15 -24 years 65 1.0% 692 9.1% 757 5.3% 25 -34 years 886 13.0% 2,524 33.1% 3,410 23.7% 35-64 years 5,005 73.7% 4,088 53.6% 9,093 63.1% 65 -74 years 482 71% 204 2.7% 686 4.8% 75 plus years 352 5.2% 116 1.5% 468 3.2% Total 16,790 100% 1 7,624 100% 14,414 100% Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3 H14 Another factor to consider in the elderly population is the percent of elderly women living alone According to 2000 U.S. Census data 5.9% of Lynwood's 15- to 64- year -olds and 5.8% of elderly men live alone, while 17 1 % of elderly women live alone. Table 3 -5 shows the extent of disabilities experienced by the elderly population, which may limit their ability to live independently An individual j with a "going outside the home disability" has a condition lasting 6 months or more that makes it difficult to go outside the home alone to shop or visit a doctor's office. An individual with a "self -care disability" has a condition lasting 6 months or more that makes it difficult to dress, bathe, or get around inside the home. According to 2000 U S. Census data, approximately a quarter (25.9 %) of the elderly population in Lynwood has at least one of these types of disability Among elderly women, 30 6% are reported to have at least one of these types of disability Elderly men and women experience a "going outside the home" disability at similar rates: 11.8% and 11.3 %, respectively Self -care disabilities occur in elderly women at a rate of 19.3% and in elderly men at a rate of 6.3 %. In both groups, self -care disabilities are accompanied by at least one other kind of disability Table 3 -5 City of Lynwood Elderly With Disabilities Limiting Independent Living Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3, Table P41. Page 3 -6 of % of % of Males Females People Disability Type Male 65+ Female 65+ Total 65+ Going Outside the Home Disability Only 112 11.8% 180 11.3% 292 11.5% Self -Care Disability Only 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Self -Care and At Least One Other Disability 60 6.3% 307 19.3% 367 t 4% Total 172 18.1% 487 30.6% 659 i5.9% Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3, Table P41. Page 3 -6 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT 2. Large Families Large households —those with five or more persons in a housing unit — constitute 47.6% of all households in Lynwood. As shown in Table 3 -6, a there are a total of 3,739 large owner- occupied households and 3,115 large renter - occupied households. Census data also shows that 99.8% of large households are family households, containing at least two people related by birth, marriage, or adoption. Table 3 -6 City of Lynwood Large'Households by Tenure Number of Persons in Unit Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Total Five 1,132 1,259 2,391 Six 1,030 805 1,835 Seven or More 1,577 1,051 2,628 Total 3,739 3,115 6,854 Percent of Total Households 25.9% 21.6% 47.6% . Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3. Table H17. These large households tend to reside in housing structures with only one unit, which may be attached or separate. Census data shows that 75% of households with five or more people reside in single -unit housing structures. In particular, 97% of large owner - occupied households live in single -unit housing structures or mobile homes. Among renters, 49% of large households reside in single -unit housing structures or mobile homes, while 51 % are found in structures with two or more housing units. 3. Female- Headed Households Female- headed households are included as a special needs group because they typically experience low rates of homeownership and low incomes. Table 3 -7 shows the number and percentage of female- headed households in Lynwood that are living below poverty level. According to Table 3 -7, 46.7% of households headed by females living with children who are related to them have incomes below the poverty level and 39.9% of the total female- headed households live below the poverty level. By comparison, 24.0% of households headed by males with no wife present live below the poverty level, and 14 7% of households with a married - couple family live below the poverty level. Page 3 -7 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 3 -7 City of Lynwood Poverty in Female- Headed Households Source U.S. Census 2000 SF3, Table P90. The homeownership rates of female- headed households are displayed in Table 3 -8. As shown in Appendix A, 47 1 % of all households in Lynwood• are owner- occupied. Female heads of households living with their own children have a homeownership rate of 19.6 %. Among female heads of households not living with their own children, 50.9% are homeowners. Overall, 30.8% of female- headed households are owner - occupied. Table 3 -8 City of Lynwood Tenure in Female - Headed Households Number Number Below % Below Above % Above % Renter Poverty Poverty Poverty Poverty Household Type Level Level Level Level Female Householder, No Householder, No Husband Present, With Related Children Under 18 1,005 46.7% 1,149 53.3% Female Householder, No With Own Children Husband Present, No Under 18 358 19.6% Related Children 99 16.1% 515 83.8% Total 1,104 39.9% 1,664 60.1% Source U.S. Census 2000 SF3, Table P90. The homeownership rates of female- headed households are displayed in Table 3 -8. As shown in Appendix A, 47 1 % of all households in Lynwood• are owner- occupied. Female heads of households living with their own children have a homeownership rate of 19.6 %. Among female heads of households not living with their own children, 50.9% are homeowners. Overall, 30.8% of female- headed households are owner - occupied. Table 3 -8 City of Lynwood Tenure in Female - Headed Households Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3, Table HCT1 4. Disabled Persons As with the elderly population, the mobility limitations of disabled persons create a demand for housing in certain locations and constructed in certain ways. Physically disabled persons often require specially designed dwellings to permit access both into and within the unit. California Administrative Code Title 24 sets forth access and adaptability requirements for the physically handicapped. These regulations apply to public buildings (e.g., offices, stores, and motels), employee housing; factory built housing and privately Page 3 -8 Number Number Owner % Owner Renter % Renter Household Type Occu ied Occupied Occupied Occupied Total Female Householder, No Husband Present, With Own Children Under 18 358 19.6% 1,466 80.4% 1,824 Female Householder, No Husband Present, Without Own Children 519 50.9% 500 49.1% 1,019 Total 877 30.8% 1,966 69.2% 2,843 Source: U.S. Census 2000 SF3, Table HCT1 4. Disabled Persons As with the elderly population, the mobility limitations of disabled persons create a demand for housing in certain locations and constructed in certain ways. Physically disabled persons often require specially designed dwellings to permit access both into and within the unit. California Administrative Code Title 24 sets forth access and adaptability requirements for the physically handicapped. These regulations apply to public buildings (e.g., offices, stores, and motels), employee housing; factory built housing and privately Page 3 -8 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT funded, newly constructed apartment houses containing five or more dwelling units. The regulations also require that items such as ramps, doorways, and restrooms be designed to enable free access to the handicapped. Such standards are not required in new single - family .residential construction. The disabled also have special needs with regard to location. There is typically a desire to be located near public facilities, and especially near public transportation facilities that provide service to the disabled. Table 3 -9 City of Lynwood Persons Reoortina Phvsical and Self Care Disabilities source: U.s. uensus 2uuu SF3, I auie vu i 2ti. ' Total 16 -20 year olds: 6,270: 21 -64 year olds. 35,261, 65+ year olds: 2,542. Table '3 -9, based on 2000 US Census data, shows the extent of the population reporting physical disabilities, self care disabilities, and "go outside the home" disabilities in Lynwood. The age group experiencing the highest rate of disability is the 65- years- and -over group, at 36.7 %. Among 16 -20 year olds, 5.9% have at least one of these disabilities. Among 21 -64 year olds, the rate is 6.8 %. Overall, 8.4% of the population reports at least one of these disabilities. 5. Homeless Population The Los Angeles Continuum of Care (CoC) includes all of Los Angeles County except the cities of Glendale, Long Beach, and Pasadena. According to the 2005 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count, it is estimated that there are 82,291 homeless persons in Los Angeles Continuum of Care at a given point in time and approximately 221,363 persons per year Of the 82,291 approximately 88% were unsheltered and 12% were living in either emergency shelter or transitional housing programs at the time of the survey The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines chronic homelessness as an unaccompanied individual with a disabling condition who has been continually homeless for one year or more; or has experienced four or more episodes of homelessness within the past three years. It is estimated that on any given night Los Angeles CoC has a chronically homeless population of approximately 34,512 persons. Page 3 -9 Self Care Go Disability Outside and At Physical Self Care Home Least One % of Age Disability Disability Disability Other Age Group Only Only Only Disability Total Group' 16 -20 Yrs. 21 12 292 44 369 5.9% 21 -64 Yrs. 620 45 892 829 2,386 6.8 0 0 65+ Yrs. _ 273 0 1 292 367 1 932 36.7% Total 16+ Yrs. 914 57 1,476 1,240 3,687 8.4% source: U.s. uensus 2uuu SF3, I auie vu i 2ti. ' Total 16 -20 year olds: 6,270: 21 -64 year olds. 35,261, 65+ year olds: 2,542. Table '3 -9, based on 2000 US Census data, shows the extent of the population reporting physical disabilities, self care disabilities, and "go outside the home" disabilities in Lynwood. The age group experiencing the highest rate of disability is the 65- years- and -over group, at 36.7 %. Among 16 -20 year olds, 5.9% have at least one of these disabilities. Among 21 -64 year olds, the rate is 6.8 %. Overall, 8.4% of the population reports at least one of these disabilities. 5. Homeless Population The Los Angeles Continuum of Care (CoC) includes all of Los Angeles County except the cities of Glendale, Long Beach, and Pasadena. According to the 2005 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count, it is estimated that there are 82,291 homeless persons in Los Angeles Continuum of Care at a given point in time and approximately 221,363 persons per year Of the 82,291 approximately 88% were unsheltered and 12% were living in either emergency shelter or transitional housing programs at the time of the survey The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development defines chronic homelessness as an unaccompanied individual with a disabling condition who has been continually homeless for one year or more; or has experienced four or more episodes of homelessness within the past three years. It is estimated that on any given night Los Angeles CoC has a chronically homeless population of approximately 34,512 persons. Page 3 -9 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Within the South subarea, which includes the cities of Lynwood, Compton, and Paramount, and parts of the City of Los Angeles and surrounding unincorporated areas, it is estimated that there are 6,860 homeless on one night and 14,886 homeless per year It is believed 90 persons are in need of shelter in Lynwood on a nightly basis. 6. Farm Workers Farm workers are traditionally defined as persons whose primary income is from seasonal agricultural work. Ranching and farming once played a major role in Lynwood's economy, but according to the 2000 Census no more than 0.2% of the City residents are now employed in farming occupations. C. SUMMARY This section provides a summary of existing and future housing needs. The major findings of this section are: • Overpayment: The population with the highest percentage of overpayment is the population of renter households in the very - low income category In this category, 76.8% households are overpaying for housing. Among very -low income households that own their housing, 55.4% experience overpayment. Overall approximately 69.2% of all Very-Low Income households report overpayment problems. • Overcrowding: In every income category, renter households experience higher rates of overcrowding than owner households. Overall, 51 7% of renter households experience overcrowding, and 37.6% of owner households. • Large Households: Large households —those with five or more persons in a housing unit — constitute 47.6% of all households in Lynwood. • Female - headed Households: According to U.S. Census data, 46.7% of households headed by females living with children who are related to them have incomes below the poverty level and 39.9% of the total female- headed households live below the poverty level. By comparison, 24 0% of households headed by males with no wife present live below the poverty level, and 14 7% of households with a married - couple family live below the poverty level. • Owner Occupied Female- headed Households: Approximately 30 8% of female- headed households are owner- occupied. Furthermore, female heads of households living with their own children have a homeownership rate of only 19.6 %. In Page 3 -10 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT comparison 471% of all households in Lynwood are owner - occupied. Page 3 -11 CITY OF LYNWOOD , HOUSING ELEMENT This page intentionally left blank. Page 3 -12 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT CHAPTER 4 RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS This section provides analysis of the following resources and constraints: • Analysis of existing and potential sites for housing of all types in the jurisdiction (including the availability of infrastructure), • An inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites; • Analysis of potential and actual non - governmental constraints upon the maintenance,. improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the availability of financing, the price of land, and cost of construction; and • Analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including land use controls, building codes, and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required for developers, and local processing and permit procedures. A. MARKET CONSTRAINTS 1. Construction and Land Costs Land costs and construction cost have the most demonstrable effect on the development and feasibility of housing. As cost for materials have increased and the limited availability of raw vacant 'land has minimized, the price of land and costs of construction have increased. Page 4 -1 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Development costs are general, as there are many variables (i.e., location, access to services, school quality, etc.) that influence the costs of development. Generally, Development costs for single - family development range from $100 to $125 per square foot, $150 to $180 for townhomes and condominiums, and $200 per square foot for garden - style apartments. Stacked flats, typically found in mixed -use development with structured parking are approximately $250 per square foot. Land costs are also relative, and can range from $25,000 per multi - family unit to $150,000 per single- family unit, with the price increasing as the density increases. B. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Local housing elements, pursuant to the Government Code, must analyze potential and actual governmental constraints upon the-maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels. The categories of constraints required in the analysis are as follows: • Land Use Controls; • Building Codes and Enforcements; • Site Improvements; • Fees and Other Exactions; • Local Processing and Permit Procedures; • Availability of Public Financing; and State law does not imply that the above factors are actually constraints in all cities. Article 10 6, however, requires a descriptive analysis of these 'factors to determine if any of them act as constraints to the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing in a local community All of the items listed above concern local regulatory factors. Besides these factors, there are some aspects of State and Federal programs, which do constrain the actions which can be feasibly implemented by local governments. Consequently, potential or actual governmental constraints include not only local, but also State of California and Federal governmental constraints, including Article 34 of the California Constitution, which requires a public referendum on some affordable housing developments. Chapters 208 and 218 of the Statutes of 1991 created additional exemptions to Article 34 for Low Rent Housing Projects. Page 4 -2 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Vacant Land The City's vacant land supply is very limited. The City currently as a limited number of vacant residential and commercially zoned parcels, primarily located within the City's commercial corridors. Although there is a limited availability of vacant sites, developer interest has been significant for development of these sites. An analysis of residential development potential of vacant land is provided in Appendix A of this Housing Element. 2. Underutilized Land There are parcels within the City that are currently built out at lower densities than.permitted by zoning. Recent developer interest and trends in land costs and new residential development concepts has indicated that reuse and redevelopment of underperforming residential and non- residential land will continue to positively influence the availability of future residential units. Future development will require the consolidation of existing parcels and updated zoning regulations to develop single family and multi - family housing. The Redevelopment Agency has been undertaking the development of residential projects on land that was previously�designated for commercial development. 3. Environmental Constraints Environmental hazards affecting the development of housing units include seismic, flooding; high wind, and noise conditions. Residential land uses are considered the most sensitive to loud noise. Federal regulations require that the impact of these and other constraints be submitted to HUD for a release of funds. 4: Availability of Sites An analysis of the General Plan maximum holding capacity based on land -use densities (Table 4 -1) indicates that a maximum of 18,247 units could be constructed in the City As the majority of sites will require the use and intensification of existing sites, a thorough analysis of potential sites are provided in Appendix A of this Housing Element. Page 4 -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Land Use Designation Implementing Zoning Maximum Density units /acre General Plan Acres Maximum Housing Unit Yield Single Family R -1 7 1,251 8,757 Townhouse/ Cluster R -2 14 368 5,152 Multi Family R -3 18 241 4,338 Total 1,860 18,247 Existing 14,763 Max Potential 3,484 Table 4 -1 General Plan Residential Land Use Designations Source: Lynwood General Plan Land Use Element, 1990 5. Site Improvements Prior to the issuance of any permit, project applicants in Lynwood are required to install streets, curbs, gutters; sidewalks, sewers, water lines, street lighting, and trees in the public right -of -way within and adjacent to the development. These facilities are then dedicated to the City, which is responsible for maintenance. Based on recent development projects, the requirement for the construction of these off -site improvements have not been shown to be a constraint to development. The City of Lynwood provides regular analysis and programming of infrastructure needs through the annual Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which provides capital improvements for needed infrastructure improvements on a citywide basis. Sources of funds for capital projects include Federal, State, local, recreation, water and electric utility sources. Federal sources may include Community Development Block 'Grants (approximately $2,000,000 /year) and a variety of Federally- subsidized grant programs. State funds may include, but are not limited to, Arterial Highway Funds, SB 821 Grants, State Gas Tax, State Demonstration Projects, and State Park Bonds. Local funds may include, but are not limited to, the General Fund, sale of land, park development fees, Redevelopment Agency revenues, and other local funds. Water and electrical utility funds may include construction bonds and Rule 21 Funds. Although more costly than above - ground lines, provision of these funding sources will mitigate, to the extent feasible, site improvement constraints to future development in this area of the City 6. Building Codes and Enforcement Lynwood has adopted the Los Angeles County Building Code, which is almost identical to the Uniform Building Code. The Los Angeles County Building Code does not impose any housing standards greater than those contained in the 1999 Uniform Building Code. Building Code standards are based on minimum requirements for health and safety of residential occupants. Therefore, revisions of industry- accepted standards for health Page 4 -4 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT and safety to reduce construction costs are not a policy of the City of Lynwood. 7. Fees and Exactions Various fees are charged by the City of Lynwood, the County Sanitation Districts of Los °Angeles County, and the Lynwood School District, for the -provision of services such as environmental review, permit processing and delivery of sanitation services and water The Sanitation Districts' connection fees are based on the type of land use and size, and range from ,$1,041 per multi- family dwelling unit to $1,735 per single family home. The City and County fees for permit review and processing are indicated on Table 4 -2. These fees are fairly uniform and comparable to adjacent communities. They are not, therefore, considered to be a development constraint. Table 4 -2 Jummar or aerecr rermn ana Processing rees Description Fee 1 AppealFee $866 2 Categorical Exemptions $108 3 . Certification of Compliance $217 5 Conditional Use Permit $1,949 6 CUP Modification $1,299 7 Environmental Assessment/Negative Dec $433 8 _ Fence Permit $54 9 General Plan Revision $1,949 10 Initial Stud $650 11 Land Use Determination Review $253 12 Lot Line Adjustment $433 13 Lot Mer er /Un -mer er $433 14 Parcel Ma /Tract Ma $2165 15 Prelim Project Review /48 hour Ian check $325 16 Property Owner Notification $217 17 Room Additions $27 18 Site Plan Review $433 19 Variance $1,949 20 Zone Change $2,165 Source: City of Lynwood, Planning Division, July 2, 2006 8. Local Processing and Permit Procedures The City of Lynwood processes Planning and Building applications in accordance with' State Law and within the time frames specified by existing laws and are not considered a constraint to development. Multi- family development (excluding condominiums) is subject to ministerial approval, which requires only a building permit. The City Planning staff conducts design review, and forwards the proposal to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation for approval by the City Council. Planning Commission meetings are once per month. If a proposal does not include an addition to the floor area, the plan can be Page 4 -5 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT approved by the Development Services Department. Typically, plot plan review requires 1 -2 weeks, and the building department plan check requires 2 -3 weeks. 9. Land Use Controls Residential development standards play a role in the feasibility of housing. The City of Lynwood Zoning Code provides development standards for all types of residential development. The City does not perceive that any of these standards limit the provision of housing within the city The codes requirements typically address health, safety, and community welfare considerations. Table 4 -3 provides a summary of development standards for residential uses. Table 4 -3 Development Standards by Resident Zonin Dis tric t Development Zoning District R -1 R -2 R -3 PRD Standard Minimum Lot Size (sf) 5,000 5,000 7,500 3,500 Minimum Lot Width 50 50 50 50 n Maximum Lot Depth 100 100 130 corner 130 corner ft 150 interior 150 interior Maximum Lot Coverage by 40 50 60 60 Buildings Maximum Coverage in Front Yard by 50 50 60 60 Impervious Surfaces Maximum Density 7 du /ac 14 du /ac 18 du /ac Per GP Maximum Building 35 35 35 35 Height ft Front Yard Setback 20 20 20 20 ft Side Yard Setback 5 5 5 5 interior ft Side Yard Setback 10 10 10 10 street ft Rear Yard Setback 1 20 1 15 15 15 Minimum Usable 2,000 /unit 1,000 /unit 500 /unit 500 /unit Open Space sf Notes: 1 Based on the requirements contained in the Lynwood Municipal Code, as amended. Discretionary review often plays a role in the feasibility of development. When Conditional Use Permits are required for residential uses, certain risk factors are introduced to the development community To address this issue, the City has developed a Site Plan Review process to substantially limit the need for conditional permits in residential development. Table 4 -4 provides a summary of permit requirements by residential land use district. Page 4 -6 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 4 -4 'Permit Requirement by Residential Zoning District Residential Type Residential Zonin g District R -1 R -2 R -3 PRD Single Family S S S S Two Family 30 du /ac S S S Second Unit S 140 units 35 units Village IV Mandf. Homes P P P C Residential Care .Facility P, P P P Group Home P P P. P Source Lynwood Municipal Code S= Site Plan Review only P = Permitted C= Conditionally Permitted a. Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan In 2006, the City of Lynwood adopted the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. The Specific Plan encompasses approximately 139 acres adjacent to Long Beach Boulevard, a primary north /south corridor The Specific Plan seeks to revitalize the corridor through flexible land use regulations that encourage mixed use and housing development. The Specific Plan allows for residential development up to 30 dwelling units per acre in all land use districts of the Specific Plan. Table 4 -5 provides a summary of residential land use capacity within the Specific Plan area. Table 4 -5 Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Summary Specific Plan . Village Acres Allowable du /ac Gross Capacity' Assumed Net Capacity' Village 1 27.0 ac 30 du /ac 810 units 202 units Village II 81 4 ac 30 du /ac 2,442 units 610 units Village 111 4.67 ac 30 du /ac 140 units 35 units Village IV 24.88 ac 30 du /ac 746 units 186 units TOTAL 137.95 ac 1 4,138 units 1 1,033 units Notes: ' Based on existing zoning standards contained. Represents the maximum allowable dwelling unit yield. Assumed conservative net holdout of the project area using 25% of available land as residential. Estimate is lower than the actual capacity of the land as entitled through the specific plan's land use standards. Source: Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, 2006. b. Parking Standards Pa'rkirig Standards for the City of Lynwood, as contained in the Municipal Code, provide standards traditionally used by municipalities. The City does not view the standards prescribed in the Municipal Code as a constraint to the development of housing as all development approvals to e 4 -6 provides a summary of required parking by type of residential use. Page 4 -7 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 4 -6 rregwrea rancor oy rresiaennar use Residential Use Number of Spaces Required Single Family, detached and 2 -car garage for each unit attached in R -1 2 -car garage or carport for each unit, plus one guest space for every two Duplex units in R -2 dwelling units. Plus 3 spaces for each on -site rental /sales office, plus one space for each additional 100 units. Carports in addition to garage. 2 -car garage for each unit, plus one Multi- family condominiums, guest space for every two dwelling units. townhomes, and similar in R -3 and Plus 3 spaces for each on -site PRD rental /sales office, plus one space for each additional 100 units. Carports in addition to garage. 2 spaces per unit, with one space required to be covered, plus one guest Apartments in R -3 space for every 2 dwelling units. Plus 3 spaces for each on -site rental /sales office, plus one space for each additional 100 units. Carports in addition to garage, 2 spaces per unit, plus one guest space Mobile Home park per every to units, plus 2 spaces for each on -site rental /sales office. Carports in addition to garage. Fraternity/Sorority/Rooming House 1 space per bed. Source: Lynwood Municipal Code C. HOUSING RESOURCES 1. Vacant and Underutilized Land There is very little vacant land remaining in the City of Lynwood zoned for residential use. New construction over the last decade in the City of Lynwood has effectively exhausted the majority of vacant and underutilized land. Therefore, future development of housing will occur on reutilized sites, second unit development, infill and residential development on sites previously non - residential. An evaluation of vacant sites, pursuant to AB 3248 is provided in Appendix A of this Housing Element. 2. New Housing Supply The City of Lynwood has seen a number of infill residential development occur within existing established neighborhoods. Since the beginning of the Housing Element planning period, approximately 595 residential units have been constructed in the City The majority of these developments consist of modest single - family residential developments and second units. A summary of all recently approved residential projects is provided in Appendix B of this Housing Element. Page 4 -8 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Due to the acquisitions necessary for the development of the 1 -105 Freeway, traversing through the middle portion of the City, a number of remnant parcels have provided residential development opportunities on parcels averaging less than 5,000 square feet. Most of these surplus parcels have been developed or are in the process of being developed. Through the establishment of the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, Redevelopment Agency sponsored projects and various requests for rezoning by private developers, a significant amount of residential development opportunities have arisen. Recent trends toward mixed use development and more modest size residential units have provided a significant level of interest in higher - intensity residential uses. Examples of recent projects approved or proceeding through the entitlement process are shown in Table 4 -7 Table 4 -7 Fernwood Estates The Redevelopment Agency has approved the development of 43 single - family units on agency - owned property located adjacent the 1 -105 Freeway The units will be multi -story and will be offered in both three and four bedrooms options. Seven (7) of the units will be targeted for families of low and moderate income (80% if County median income) and the remaining units will be sold at market rate (120% of County Median Income ). Triangle Project An 11 -acre site targeted for up to 120 single - family detached units within a gated setting, the design and layout for this project is in the preliminary stages and will incorporate open space within the project. The project will consist of two -story dwellings and will be available in three and four bedroom options. Each unit will have a two -car garage with ample landscaping. The density factor in this development will remain low at approximately nine to ten units to Whispering Glenn A single - family housing developmeht of 39 units. This will be a gated community and will have recreational space provided within the project. The units will be available in three and four bedroom options and range in size from 1,700 to 1,800 square feet. SELAC Senior Housing The SELAC project is located at 11300 Atlantic Avenue. Previously this location was an abandoned motel which was purchased by the City and turned over to the Developer for rehabilitation and constructionof Senior Housing under a Disposition and Development Agreement. Agency Members voted in January to sell the property to JB Construction to complete the work. Currently the Redevelopment Agency is assuming the cost of the Page 4 -9 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 4 -7 Recent Development Projects Muriel Estates Muriel Estates is located just south of the 1 -105 Freeway between Thorson Drive and Muriel. The project consists of the construction of 6 single family detached.homes. Bullis- Fernwood The Bullis- Fernwood Project is a proposal from Rita Construction to construct 11 -14 single family detached homes on Agency owned property Staff is currently working with the Developer on an ENA. The Exclusive Agreement will designate twenty - percent 200% of these homes as affordable. Redwood Homes The Redwood Homes Project has been completed by Ray and Andy Patel of Rita Construction. The project includes the construction of nine (9) detached single - family units, three of which are designated affordable. The Project is located on Redwood Avenue just east of State Street. Mobile Home Park Development Located at 4307 -09 Carlin Avenue, developer Carlin (Urban Vision) Ave Village LLC has acquired the existing mobile home park and redevelop the site with manufactured housing, to be sold to lease- purchasers at prices below current market for single - family homes. This project is not located within a Redevelopment Project Area and the developer is not currently seeking any Agency assistance 22 units of which 6 will give current trailer owners first right of refusal. Fernwood -Birch The Fernwood / Birch Housing Project is a proposal that was submitted by Rita Construction for the construction of four (4) single family homes on Agency Owned Property that was purchased from CalTrans Excess Land Sales. Developer currently holds a DDA. Casa Corona The proposed development concept is comprised of two (2) city blocks totaling 105,530 sq ft. (2.42 acres) comprised of fifteen (15) parcels. The property is located on the southeast side of Imperial Highway between Atlantic Avenue and Duncan Avenue (See attached parcel map). The proposed multi -level development concept would construct approximately 11,650 sq ft. of retail /commercial; 30,000 sq ft. of office space; a 4,500 sq ft. Sports bar/ restaurant, a 3,000 sq ft, banquet hall; and 78,000 sq ft. of housing (96 units) totaling 127,150 sq ft. of proposed mixed use. Lynwood Springs Proposed mixed -use project located along Long Beach Blvd. The project is bounded by the 1 -105 Fwy to the north, Josephine Street to the south and Lewis Street to the east. The project sets back just past Lewis Street encompassing the Redevelopment Project Area, both at its north and south borders. The Developer is proposing 255 apartment units and 4,095 s ft of retail. Page 4 -10 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Recent Table 4 -7 Long Beach East The Long Beach Boulevard East Project consists of approximately 138,773 square feet of proposed mixed -use retail and residential development. The Redevelopment Agency previously selected Plaza Mexico as the Developer for this project. A Draft ENA has been provided to Plaza Mexico and the project is part of the ongoing Redevelopment Staff and Plaza Mexico Expansion Team meetings. 3. Regulatory Resources a. Second Dwelling Units The City of Lynwood permits the development of second units on single - family lots, subject to Site Plan Review Site Plan Review is intended to provide assurance that the second unit is compatible in design with the primary dwelling unit on the site, and is considered an "over the counter" approval. Second units have a maximum square footage of 1,200 square feet and are permitted on lots with minimum area of 6,220 square feet. b. Transitional Housing and Emergency Shelters Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Lynwood Municipal Code, homeless /transitional shelters may be considered for location in the Multi- family Residential (R -3) Zone and the Manufacturing (M) Zone subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The purpose of the Conditional Permit review is to determine that the characteristics of these uses are not incompatible with the type of uses located in surrounding areas. The City of Lynwood believes this general requirement does not have a demonstrable negative impact on the development or cost of providing facilities. To demonstrate this, the following findings must be made to grant a Conditional Use Permit for homeless and transitional facilities: • The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan; • The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses; • Buildings, and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; • The site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use and buildings proposed; • The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zoning district; and • The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of the zoning code. Page 4 -11 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT C. Residential Density Bonus On March 5, 2005, the City of Lynwood adopted a Residential Density Bonus Ordinance intended to provide incentives for the production of housing for very low, lower income, and senior households in accordance with sections 65915 and 65917 of the California Government Code. The City may grant a density bonus a minimum of 25 percent, or a density bonus with additional incentives to an applicant or developer of a housing development, who agrees to provide the following: • At least twenty percent of the total units of the housing development as target units affordable to lower income households; or • At least ten percent of the total units of the housing development as target units affordable to very low income households, or • Senior citizen housing. In addition, the City can provide a density bonus with additional incentives for qualified housing development, upon the written request of a developer, unless the city determines that the additional incentives are not necessary to make the housing development economically feasible and to accommodate a density bonus. The need for incentives will vary for different housing development. Therefore, the allocation of additional incentives shall be determined on a case by case basis and may include, but are not limited to, any of the following: A reduction of site development standards or a modification of zoning code or architectural design requirements which exceed the minimum building standards of the California Health and Safety Code. These may include, but are not limited to the following: • Reduced minimum lot sizes and/ or dimensions • Reduced minimum lot setbacks • Reduced minimum outdoor and/ or private outdoor living area • Increased maximum lot coverage • Increased maximum building height and /or stories • Reduced on -site parking standards, including the number or size of spaces and garage requirements • Reduced minimum building separation requirements • Reduced street standards (i.e. minimum street widths) • Other additional incentives Page 4 -12 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT • Allow the housing development to include nonresidential uses and /or allow the housing development within a nonresidential zone • Other regulatory incentives or concession proposed by the developer or the city which result in identifiable cost reductions or avoidance • A density bonus of more than twenty -five percent • Waived, reduced, or deferred planning, plan check, construction permit, and/ or development impact fees (i.e capital facilities, park, or traffic fees) • Direct financial aid (i.e. redevelopment set - aside, community development block grant funding) in the form of a loan or a grant to subsidize or provide low interest financing for an on or off site improvement, land or construction costs. The city may also offer an equivalent financial incentive in lieu of granting a density bonus and additional incentives. Inclusionary Zoning Regulations The purpose of the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations is to enhance the public welfare and assure that further housing development contributes to the attainment of the city's housing goals by increasing the production of residential units affordable by households of very-low, low, and moderate income. The regulation, adopted in March of 2005, requires all new residential development projects within Redevelopment Project Area A of seven or more units to construct fifteen percent of the total number of dwelling units within the development as affordable units. Units must be made available to Moderate, Low and Very Low income households based on prescribed standards provided in Article 24 of the Municipal Code. 4. Financial Resources The City of Lynwood, like all other cities, is limited in its ability to provide housing programs based upon the availability of funding from outside sources. Interest rates are determined by national policies and economic conditions. Much has been done on the national level to increase the level of home ownership and continue the support of affordable housing through the on -going tax credit operated by the State of California. Federal and State programs, which have flourished in the past, are subject to annual fluctuations based upon decisions, which are of limited control by the City Furthermore, State initiatives that limit City revenues have been subject to substantial changes in recent years. The City utilizes CDBG and HOME funds for housing activities. Table 4 -8 provides a summary of available funds for housing. Page 4 -13 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 4 -8 Use of CDBG and HOME Funds for Housing Related Activities Allocation Amount 05106 1 Housing Related Activities CDBG Funds $1,754,291 CDBG Administration Fair Housing Foundation Code Enforcement Section 108 Payment Street Improvements Natatorium Improvement Phase 2 $668,108 HOME Administration HOME CHODO Single /Multi Family Rehab. First Time Home Buyers Purchase & Rehab. a. Redevelopment Agency Set -Aside Funds Lynwood Redevelopment Agency set -aside funds are one of the primary sources of funding and financing for the preservation, conservation and improvement of affordable housing. As required by State law, Lynwood places 20% of its tax increment revenue in a housing fund for the expressed purpose to increase the supply of affordable housing. Table 4- 9 provides a summary of Agency Set -Aside funds. Table 4 -9 Redevelopment Agency Set -Aside Fund Summary FY 2004 -2007 Project Area "A" $673,709 $1,969,100 $1,999,080 $733,478 Alameda Project Area $204,243 1 $166,200 $166,200 $187,057 Actual Mid Year Estimated Year Adopted FY 04 -05 Budget End Budget FY 05 -06 FY 05 -06 FY 06 -07 b. Recent Projects Recently assisted residential projects within the Redevelopment Project Area are shown in Table 4 -10. Page 4 -14 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table 4 -10 Redevelopment Projects Developer Type Units Base Pricing' Range Sunset Homes Single Famil 8 $145,000 - $165,000 Law Emerald Village Single Family 65 $152,950 - $162,950 Moderate Ed ebrook Single Family 18 $150,000- $160,000 Low /Moderate Curry Temple Single Family 1 $150,0004160,000 Low /Moderate Access Communit Sin le Famil 2 $155,000 ow Hub Cities Sin le Famil 6 $150,000 ow SELAC Multi-Family 18 $98,000- $101,000 Ver Low /Low Total 192 J - Deleted: Moderate Deleted: Moderate - - Deleted: Moderate Notes: ' Based on estimated sales prices at time of construction. Affordability in the City of Lynwood is based on the Los Angeles County median income of $52,100 per year and has been calculated in Table 4- 11 Table 4 -11 Affordable Los Angeles County Housing Costs 2000 Affordability Analysis Percent of Income Feb -2000 $7,815 $12,504 $18,756 $18,757 Monthly Available Los Angeles $641 $1,042 $1,563 $1,564 Taxes & Insurance Est. Co. Median Very $156 $234 Above Year Income Low Low Moderate Moderate State 8% 50% 80% 120% 120 %+ 2000 Area Median $52,100 2000 State $52,100 $26,050 $41,680 $62,520 $62,521 Affordability Analysis Percent of Income 30% $7,815 $12,504 $18,756 $18,757 Monthly Available $641 $1,042 $1,563 $1,564 Taxes & Insurance Est. 15% $98 $156 $234 $235 Net Available $553 $886 $1,329 $1,330 Mortgage Rate 8% Cost Per $1,000 $7.34 Loan Amount $75,340 $120,708 $181,062 $181,063 Source: Wagner & Associates, Inc. City of Lynwood Consolidated Plan The City of Lynwood administers its Consolidated Plan, Strategic Plan, and Annual Action Plan. The Consolidated Plan describes the City's plans for the use and distribution and federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs. The Consolidated Plan 2006 -2010 entitlements are estimated at $5,571,180. Of these funds, a percentage of funding is allocated to housing related activities including Section 108 Loan repayments, code enforcement, fair housing, program administration, Page 4 -15 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT CHDO set - aside, rehab, acquisition and first time homebuyer assistance. The Consolidate Plan provides the City's primary financial assistance for housing programs d. County of Los Angeles Consolidated Plan The County addresses regional needs by conducting activities to meet the County's Consolidated Plan goals of providing housing production and acquisition, housing preservation and improvement, housing assistance, removal of constraints, economic development, public services, homeless activities, improvements to public works and neighborhood facilities, and assisting people with special needs. A variety of strategies and programs to address these goals are discussed in the County Housing and Community Development Plan (HCDP) These strategies are summarized as follows. e. County Housing Production and Acquisition Within the goal of housing and production and acquisition, our strategies include: • Expanding the available supply of affordable rental housing; • Strengthening relationships with the non - profit housing department sector to increase the supply of affordable housing; • Increasing home ownership opportunities; • Expanding the supply of affordable housing through neighborhood revitalization efforts; • Expanding the available supply of housing for the homeless and those persons with identified special needs. f. County Housing Preservation and Improvement The strategies for housing preservation and improvement include: • Preserving existing housing units by rehabilitating older, substandard housing that is affordable to lower- income housing; • Rehabilitating existing rental structures to continue their use in the provision of affordable housing; • Ensuring continued affordability of publicly assisted, "at- risk" lower- income housing; and, Page 4 -16 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT • Preventing neighborhood deterioration through the linkage of code compliance and rehabilitation. g. County Housing Assistance Strategies included under housing assistance are • Utilizing rent subsidy programs; • Providing a continuum of assistance from the prevention of homelessness to a transition into home ownership, • Providing coordination of special needs assistance; and, • Providing emergency housing and financial assistance for groups with special needs. h. County Programs to Minimize Barriers to Affordable Housing The County plans to minimize barriers to affordable housing by utilizing the following strategies: • Developing procedures that do not unduly constrain, but rather encourage, the development of affordable housing; • Encouraging the production of a housing supply that ranges broadly enough in price and rent to enable all households to gain housing, regardless of income; • Securing adequate affordable housing and ensuring that housing is accessible to all persons, whether discrimination is overt or the subtle product of government regulation; • Identifying a number of action areas that will be investigated, provided adequate funding is available in light of the County's fiscal crisis; • Proposing a number of actions to promote affordable housing and provide equal access. L County Homeless Activities /Supportive Services Certain segments of'the population such as the homeless, the "at- risk" of becoming homeless population, elderly, large families, female- headed households, and the disabled have specific needs which must be addressed through the provision of supportive services. The County addresses these needs through a variety of programs listed in the HCDP j. County Social /Public Services Page 4 -17 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Populations with special needs, such as the elderly, large families, female- headed households and the disabled also require supportive services. County departments network with a variety of non - profit organizations (including housing providers), participating cities, and private consultants to provide a wide variety of social /public services including: child -care, youth programs, senior citizen services, veterans services, programs for the disabled, battered spouses and children, chronically mentally disabled, drug addicts, alcoholics, runaway teens, and persons living with HIV /AIDS The identification of priority needs serves to provide direction in focusing goals, objectives, and strategies into actual programs and projects. k. County Priority Housing Development Needs The CDC's Housing Development's homebuyer and other grant programs have attempted to achieve an equitable distribution of program resources throughout the county One of the top priorities in meeting the housing needs of the county's low- and moderate - income residents is to expand the supply of housing through new construction and the acquisition of land for new construction. Geographic location frequently determines focus of activities. Some housing activities, such as a referral service for persons living with HIV /AIDS, would need to be conducted on a county -wide basis, while a site for permanent service- enhanced housing for this client group would be located in the area of greatest'need. County Priority Housing Preservation. Needs The overlying priority for housing preservation programs is to provide most of the available resources to the low- and moderate - income residents in designated areas throughout the County The highest priority is to provide funds in the form of low- interest and deferred loans, grants, and -rental rehabilitation loans to the residents of .Neighborhood Improvement Strategy areas located in low- and moderate - income areas. M. County Priority Homeless Needs The top priority in utilizing resources to meet homeless needs is to develop a "continuum of care" approach, which attempts to solve homelessness by addressing the various causes of homelessness: lack of support services and affordable housing and insufficient income. The County's continuum of care strategy includes the vital components of homeless prevention, - outreach assessment, emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent housing and supportive housing. Several funding sources including Homeless Initiative and Emergency Shelter Grant funds have been targeted for the development of each of these components. n. County Public Housing Improvement Efforts Page 4 -18 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT High quality public housing is the result of effective management and enduring maintenance efforts. The County of Los Angeles endeavors to maintain the high quality of its public housing stock through a management strategy that emphasizes staff development, goal setting in accordance with established objectives, audit responsiveness, and increased efficiency through automation. Efforts to improve the management and operation of public housing include ongoing staff training and education at HUD and housing industry seminars. Staff is also provided with reading materials to keep current on trends and new information in the public housing field. Management of public housing in the County is enhanced through goal setting that adheres to overall objectives that encourage: • Self- sufficiency for residents through programs that encourage independent living; • Development of a work environment that fosters creativity, productivity, and maximization of employee potential through employee training, development and promotional opportunities; and, • Participatory management built upon a positive regard for people and respect for the contribution of each employee. In an effort to improve overall operational efficiency, the CDC has recently automated its public housing operation which allows the decentralization of all financial processing, the tracking of annual reexaminations and inspections, and the Public Housing and Management Assessment Program (PHMAP) reports. The system allows interface with a tenant accounting system and also permits tracking of unit inventory, inspections, and work orders. The system also provides information on the demographics of the resident population, including age, ethnicity, and income. The near -term goal is to ensure that the new automation system is utilized to its fullest capacity in the operation of the County's public housing. o. County Lead -Based Paint Strategies The County has a two - tiered approach to the evaluation and elimination of lead -based paint hazards where the problem has been determined to be most prevalent. Grant funding for the expansion of the County's lead hazard evaluation program and establishment of a lead hazard reduction program has been provided by the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC and P) and HUD's Office of Lead -Based Paint Abatement respectively The lead hazard reduction program, known as the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program (CLPPP), involves outreach, screening, case management, and public education in seven target areas. The lead hazard reduction program involves environmental testing, lead hazard education, blood -lead testing for children, hazard reduction grants, and follow -up monitoring and testing, also in seven target areas. Page 4 -19 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT In addition to the lead -based paint outreach, assessment and abatement activities that are currently taking place in existing housing programs, the County also conducts housing inspections to determine if various types of housing are safe, sanitary and fit for habitation. Hotels, motels and other non - medical housing are inspected on a regular basis to ensure that it complies with health and safety standards. Emergency shelter housing is also subject to health and safety inspections before participation is allowed in the County's voucher program. Routine health and safety inspections take place in over 60,000 multiple family dwellings to ensure that units are maintained per health department requirements. P_ County One -Year Action Plan The one -year Action Plan describes the specific activities that will be undertaken during the County's planning period to address the needs and local objectives stated in the Consolidated Plan. Specific projects that will be implemented include those to foster and maintain affordable housing, to improve public housing and expand resident initiatives, remove barriers to affordable housing, evaluate and reduce lead -based hazards, reduce the number of households below the poverty line, enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies, and provide assistance to prevent homelessness and address the needs of the homeless through a continuum of care that provides not only emergency assistance but also a means of transitioning to permanent housing and self- sufficiency Projects that will be funded with CDBG, ESG and HOME funds are included as a component of the one -year Action Plan. The project information forms contain individual project descriptions, location, census tract(s), funding amount, and proposed accomplishments. The one -year Action Plan also describes monitoring standards, certifications, and specific grant submission requirements for CDBG, ESG and HOME. In conclusion, the County's Consolidated Plan provides a comprehensive approach for analysis of housing and community development needs and establishes a mechanism for prioritizing needs and allocating resources based on those needs. The scope of the document has expanded the need for dialogue among the many entities involved in the various aspects of housing and community development and allows the County to develop a partnership approach among government, non - profits, for - profit organizations, business, and industry to provide assistance to those in need of affordable housing and a variety of community services. Page 4 -20 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT CHAPTER 5 POLICY PLAN Housing programs are intended to further detail the City of Lynwood's commitment to assure the continued maintenance, improvement and development of housing within the City This section provides specific details, which will aid in the implementation of the City's housing programs. A description is provided for each implementation measure. Program information is also intended to show the City's commitment to maintain, improve and develop housing in the community through a "good faith, diligent effort" as required by State Housing Law (Government Code Section 65583(c)) A. STATEWIDE GOALS Lynwood supports and endorses the statewide housing goal " of a decent home and a satisfying environment for every Californian. " In addition, the City supports and endorses the five goals incorporated in present State Law pertaining to the manner in which the actions of the City of Lynwood must be directed so that there is adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments. These statewide goals are summarized below Goal1 Conserve and improve the condition of the existing standard affordable housing stock. Goal 2: Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low -and moderate - income households. Goal 3: Identify adequate housing sites which will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with public services and facilities needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income groups. Page 5 -1 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Goal 4: Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement and development of housing. Goal 5: Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin or color B. CITY GOALS AND PROGRAMS Each housing program is described in the following detail: • Brief statement of program, including specific City actions, which will be taken to implement the program, • City Agency or department responsible for implementation; • Financing or funding source; • Quantified objectives (where possible); and; • Schedule for implementation. GOAL 1. The provision of decent and adequate housing for all existing residents, and for those who chose to become residents of Lynwood, regardless of age, sex, marital status, ethnic background, religion, income, or other arbitrary factors. Policy 1 1 Review the General Plan and Zoning Kjap on an annual _ _. - Deletec basis to monitor the availability of suitable vacant or Deletec underutilized land to accommodate a variety of housing types in the City Policy 1.2 Require that development proposals include provisions to meet housing needs and programs as set forth in the Housing Element. Policy 1.3 Require that new housing construction and rehabilitation be designed to accommodate the special housing needs of the City for handicapped, elderly, large family, overcrowded, and /or female headed households. Policy 1 4 Utilize the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the _ . - Deletec _- zoning ordian nce to provide adequate - site - s - to - r a _ variety of se housing types, while ensuring that environmental, public infrastructure and traffic constrains are adequately addressed. Policy 1.5 Where appropriate, encourage the re- designation of vacant or under - utilized non - residential lands to residential Page 5 -2 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT use, with allowable densities to facilitate the development of a variety of housing types to meet the existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the City Policy 1.6 Promote Fair Housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin or color Policy 1.7 Encourage the recycling of under - utilized residential land, where such recycling is consistent with established land use plans. Policy 1.8 Pursue the acquisition of substandard units and assembly of land for development of new residential units. Policy 1.9 Comply with the requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to provide for reasonable accommodation in the zoning code and other land use regulations to provide housing for persons with disabilities. Programs /Quantified Objectives a. Private Development Private developers are developing new single - family homes for sale to residents or those choosing to live in the city Approximately 35 moderate - income homes_ will be developed over__ - the planning period. Private development multi- family will also be constructed. 30 low- income units constructed in the planning period, for a total of 65 units during the housing element planning . period • Objective: 65 units • Responsible City will approve plans and issue permits Agency: • Financing Private funds Sources: • Time Frame: 2000- 007 _ _ _ _ _ - Deleted: These units are being sold in the moderate income range at $180,000 to $190,000. Deleted: next five years Deleted: 2005 Page 5 -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT b. Emergency Shelter s/Transitional Housing Provide for emergency shelters, transitional housing and supportive services to homeless individuals and families for 90 individuals and 30 families in cooperation with the Los Angeles County Homeless Services Authority and Continuum of Care Planning Process Seek to provide. 90 beds for individual Deletes homeless and 30 beds for persons in families with children. Deletec __ • Objective: 120 beds /units _ Deletec • Responsible Development Services Department, o units Agency: Redevelopment Agency, Truevine Homeless Shelter. Peace and Joy Center or other similar participating agencies. C. ME • Financing Redevelopment tax increment funds, Sources: potential Federal, State and County , funding, Continuum of Care (Super NOFA) • Time Frame: 2000 - 2007 _ Deletec -- ----- -- --- --- -- -- -- - 005 Emergency Shelters/Transitional Housing Development Continue to sup port the Truevine Communitv Outreach Operation Rescue Transitional Housing and the Peace and Joy Center (Esther's House) for emergency and transitional housing and investigate the feasibility of coordinating with other governmental entities, non - profit agencies and private enterprise for the purpose of acquiring and retro - fitting an existing structure for use as "single room occupancy" housing facility for the homeless and persons in need of emergency shelter. If determined to be feasible creation of up to 20 single room dwelling units providinq housing to persons who ar e homeless and /or in need of temDorary or emergency shelter Objective: 20 dwelling units • Responsible Development Services Department, Agency: Redevelopment Agency Truevine Homeless Shelter. Peace and Joy Center or other similar participating agencies • Financing Redevelopment tax increment funds Sources: potential Federal. State and Countv fundinq, Continuum of Care (Super NOFA) • Time Frame: 2000 -2007 Emergency Shelter s/Transitional Housing Permit Processing Review and revise the Zoning Code as appropriate to evaluate the effects of Conditional Use Permits in encouraging and facilitating Page 5 -4 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT the development of emergency and transitional housing projects. Evaluate the appropriateness of revised standards and permit requirements that will encourage and facilitate the development of emergency and transitional housing. • Responsible Community Development Department, or Agency: other similar participating agencies. 9 e. • Financing General Fund • Time Frame: 2000 -2007 Continue Funding for In -Place Supportive Housing Continue to allocate CDBG funds and public service agency funds for helping homeless persons find permanent housing through continued support of the Missionaries of Charity. Queen of Peace Home and Supportive Services for Substance Abusers and other existing services. • Responsible Redevelopment Department, Agency: Redevelopment Agency and similar participating agencies. • Financing Redevelopment tax increment funds Sources: potential Federal. State and County funding, Continuum of Care (Super NOFA) • Time Frame: 2000 -2007 Land Assembly /New Development - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbenng - - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering '- - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering '- - - - Formatted: Builets and Numbering This program will include, as necessary, the acquisition and assembly of land, relocation of any residents, demolition of existing structures, and the construction of new single - family owner - occupied units and new multi - family units, for all economic groups. The program will be conducted pursuant to all requirements of the California Redevelopment Law, within the jurisdiction of the Redevelopment Agency Approximately 60 new units will be constructed and at least half will be for low- income and half for moderate - income families. New single - family homes will also meet the needs of existing renters because the City desires to make homeowners out of existing renters. The City's objective is to improve the stability of the community • Objective: • Responsible Agency: • Financing Sources: 60 units Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment tax increment funds, potential Federal, State and County funding Page 5 -5 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT IN Time Frame 2000 - ,2007 f. Redevelopment Senior Housing This program will include the development of 25 senior units, including an existing older motel that will be redeveloped into senior housing, IN - - - - - -- - - - - ------ - - - --- Objective: 25 units IN Responsible Redevelopment Agency Agency: IN Financing Redevelopment Agency 20% and /or Silent Source: Seconds Repayments • Time Frame: 2007 -2008 g. Fair Housing The Fair Housing foundation implements the policies and practices for fair housing in Lynwood and takes action orl any circumstances that affect equal housing opportunities. The City refers all inquiries for these services to the Fair Housing Foundation and also maintains literature and informational brochures at City Hall that are available for public distribution. The City will continue the provision of fair housing assistance including landlord /tenant counseling, homebuver assistance and ameliorat or remov of identified impediments which is target at 200 residents on an annual basis. Deletec 005 Forma ed: Bullets and Numben g Current plans call for the combin ing of two motel rooms into one unit Deletec 000- 2001 Bullets and • Responsible Redevelopment Department Agency: • Projected Federal Community Development Block Funding: Grants, Deletec -- ----------------------- _ • Time Frame: Ongoing B,000 per year h. Reasonable Accommodation determining whether a requested accommodation is reasonable and ministerial approval for minor requests. Page 5 -6 To comply with fair housing laws, the City will analvze existing land use controls building codes and permit and processing procedures to determine constraints they impose on the CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT • Responsible Community Development Department Agency: • Financing General Fund Sources: • Time Frame: 2007 -2008 I. Evaluation of Covenants and Deed Restrictions To encourage the development of affordable housing development and ensure the continued availability of affordable housing to Lynwood residents the City will consider the establishment of covenants, deed restrictions or other methods when redevelopment agency or other public funds are used to develop affordable housing. In addition the City will encourage the private development community to consider long -term affordability restrictions. The City will evaluate on a cases -by- affordability covenants on future housing development. • Responsible Community Development Agency: Department/Redevelopment Agency • Financing General Fund/RDA Sources: • Time Frame: Establish statement of Policy by June 2008. Provide annual review of policy. GOAL 2: Improve the housing quality of the existing housing stock through housing rehabilitation assistance and enforcement procedures. Policy 2.1 The City of Lynwood will strive to remove any units identified as being unsafe and dilapidated and replace such units on a unit for unit basis. Policy 2.2 The City will continue to provide rehabilitation assistance through available Federal grant programs and Redevelopment Agency monies to assure that the existing housing stock is adequately maintained. Policy 2.3 The City, through its rehabilitation and improvement assistance programs will encourage housing additions to reduce overcrowding conditions; and modifications to accommodate the elderly and the disabled. Programs/Quantified Objectives Formatted: Bullets andNurnbering Formatted: Bullets and Numbering - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Formatted: Bullets and Numbering - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Page 5 -7 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT The housing condition survey identifies a continued need for a housing rehabilitation program due to the fact that there are dwelling units found to be in need of both minor and major repairs. The following programs include a variety of components to address the overall housing needs. These programs offer financial assistance to expand housing opportunities for low and moderate - income households. Financial assistance is provided in the form of grants, deferred loans, and loans for mortgage assistance a. Code Enforcement Program Targeted enforcement for substandard units in defined target areas in the City The program will seek to identify and eliminate slum and blighted conditions in targeted area determined the most in need of enforcement activities Seek to accomplish 1,25 property maintenance violations. 2,500 zoning violations and 1.250 building /plumbing /electrical violations annually. The annual budget for this program is estimated at $ • Responsible Quality of Life Department Agency: • Financing Federal Community Development Block Source: Grants • Time Frame: Annually b. Housing Rehabilitation Program The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide financial assistance to eligible owners for the rehabilitation of their properties. An estimated 30 housing units will be rehabilitated_ during the housing element planning period Th annual allocation_ is approximately $214,000. Program participants will be eligible for deferred payment loans up to $65,000 or $10,000 grants. • Responsible Redevelopment Department Agency: • Financing }10ME Source: ------------------------------ • Time Frame: 2000 -2007 C. Rental Rehabilitation Program Utilize HOME funds to provide deferred payment loans to qualifying rental properties for rehabilitation of rental units Seek to provide rehabilitation assistance for 2 housing units on an annual basis. • Responsible Redevelopment Department Agency: • Financing HOME Q Page 5 -6 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Source: Time Frame: 2000 -2007 ___________ ____ Formatted: Bullets and Numbering GOAL 3: Assist in achieving housing affordability for all residents, as is reasonably and financially possible. Policy 3.1 The City will coordinate with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to publicize and encourage the use of Section 8 rental assistance certificates. Policy 3.2 The City and the Redevelopment Agency will continue to provide assistance in the development of new affordable housing purchase opportunities. Policy 3.3 Provide incentives for and otherwise encourage the private development of new affordable housing for low- and moderate- income households. Policy 3.4 Investigate and pursue programs and funding sources designed to expand housing opportunities for low- and moderate - income households, including the elderly and disabled. Policy 3.5 Facilitate the construction of low- and moderate - income housing, to the extent possible. Programs /Quantified Obiectives a. Section 8 Rental Assistance The Los Angeles County Housing Authority currently administers the Section 8 Rental Assistance program. C urrently the program assists 487 renters in Lynwood Based on future congressional appropriations. th e_ County__ Housing_Authoritywill apply__for additional funding which will enable the Housing Authority to administer an additional certificate for families, elderly, handicapped and disabled persons over the housing element . I- planning period Responsible LA County Housing Authority Agency: Financing HUD Source: Time Frame: 2000 -2007 I b. First Time Homebuver Program The Deleted: Deferred Loans¶ 11 The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide deferred loans to eligible homeowners for rehabilitation of their properly. During the next five fiscal years, an estimated 20 households will be rehabilitated with $100,000 annual allocation.¶ ,#>Responsible Agency: F.. Deleted: As of January 1998 a total of 122,043 households are on the waiting list for Section 8 assistance Deleted: T Deleted: next five years Deleted: 5 Page 5 -9 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT City will s eek to provide assistance to 3 families on an annual basis. • Responsible Agency: • Financing Source: • Time Frame: City of Lynwood HOME Funds 2000 -2007 C. Federal HOME Program The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide mortgage assistance for eligible first time homebuyers. The City will allocate approximately $100,000 on an annual basis and during the next five years approximately 20 households will be provided mortgage assistance to purchase an affordable home. • Responsible City of Lynwood Agency• • Financing Federal HOME Program Source: • Time Frame: 2001 -2005 Page 5 -10 CITY OF LYNwooD HOUSING ELEMENT rl CHDO Housing Projects This will provide funding for qualified CHDO's to develop affordable housing. The City will issue RFQ's seeking qualified non - profit organizations to develop an affordable housing project. Funds will be made available on an annual basis. • Responsible Redevelopment Agency Agency: • Financing HOME Funds and Grants Source: • Time Frame: 2000 -2007 Inclusionary Zoning Regulations - Continue to implement the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations through Article 24 of the Lynwood Municipal Code, which require all new residential development projects in redevelopment project area A with seven or more units to construct fifteen percent of the total number of dwelling units within the development as affordable. • Objective: • Responsible Agency • Financing Source: • Time Frame: 100 units Development Services Department Private developer funded Ongoing/ Annual review of progress Residential Density Bonus Ordinance - - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Continue implementation of the City's Residential Density Bonus Ordinance, which allows a density bonus or a density bonus with additional incentives to housing developments that provide the following: a) at least twenty percent of the total units of the housing development as target units for affordable to lower income households; or b) at least ten percent of the total units of the housing development as target units affordable to very low income households; or c) senior citizen housing. • Objective: • Responsible Agency: • Financing Source: • Time Frame: 100 units I - - Deleted: XXX Development Services Department Private developer funded Ongoing/ Annual review of progress - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbenng - - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering I. - - Deleted: XXX Page 5 -11 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT g. Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Residential Development Ensure development within the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan allows for the construction of multi - family residential development in appropriate areas and development standards can accommodate residential development capacities that meet the RHNA allocations as shown in Table A -5 of the Housing Element. - - -- - --------------- • Responsible Development Services Agency: • Financing Market- driven Source: • Time Frame: Q n_going - -_ _ -. -- Encouragement of Infill Construction The City will continue to aggressively pursue infill development within feasible development sites (specifically remaining sites within the Caltrans right -of -way) for homeownership and rental units. This process would encourage the development of infill residential development through proactive and coordinated efforts with the redevelopment agency, development services, Caltrans, and private development entities to provide development guidance and assistance to encourage the construction of residential development affordable to very low -, low- and moderate - income levels through a variety of land use tools (i.e, streamlined review, reduced development standards, land assemblage, lot consolidation, fee assistance and other methods deemed appropriate). • Objective: • Responsible Agency: • Financing Source: • Time Frame: z ed: g 150 unit s Deletec Developmental Services xx General Fund, CDBG, HOME O n -going -- -------------------- - - - - -- Encouragement of Multi - Family Rental Housing for Low- and — Very Low - Income Residents The City will continue to implement the City's Site Plan Review process, which allows the development of second units less than 1,200 square feet and two - family units to be constructed with only site plan review This will encourage the development of affordable housing within existing neighborhoods. Additionally, continue to implement the requirements of the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, Density Bonus Ordinance and the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan to further enhance the development of multi - family residential units. - _ - Deletec Deletec Z ed: g Page 5 -12 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Provide a yearly review of the standards and provisions of Ordinances and zoning requirements to modify standards to further encourage multi - family development. Evaluate the appropriateness and effectiveness of offering additional incentives such as additional density bonuses, permit streamlining, or financial incentives. Amend the Zoning Code as appropriate. • Responsible Development Services Department Agency: • Financing General Fund Sources: • Time Frame: Annually j. Encouragement of Housing Development of Persons with Extremely Low Incomes The City consider the housing needs of persons considered "Extremely Low Income ", or those earning 30% or less of the County Median Family Income (MFI), including the expansion of housing opportunities for a variety of housing types including, multifamily rental housing, factory -built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single -room occupancy units, emergency shelters and transitional housing. Responsible Agency: Financing Sources: Time.Frame: Development Services Department General Fund On -going ,c. Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program The City will provide an annual allocation of,HOME Program funds to purchase and acquire vacant or underutilized property that will be rehabilitated according to minimum property standards and be made available to be purchased by low and moderate households. units on an annual basis. • Responsible Agencv: • Financing Source: • Time Frame: City of Lynwood HOME Program 2000 -2007 Formatted Formatted: Bullets and Numbering - - - Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted:I Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Deleted: Purchase and Acquisition Program Deleted: $ 100,000 in Deleted: During the next five fiscal years, approximately 10 residential properties will be purchased and rehabilitated. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Page 5 -13 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT GOAL 4: Assure increased energy efficiency and self - sufficiency through the use of energy conservation measures in all homes, including low- and moderate - income housing. Policy 4 1 Promote the use of energy and water conservation measures in low- and moderate - income housing. Policy 4.2 Promote opportunities for the use of solar energy by assuring solar access on all properties to be developed in the future. Policy 4.3 Promote plans and programs for well- designed energy efficient lower income housing development located in areas appropriate to the needs and desires of the constituent population, and convenient to public transportation, shopping, recreation, and other community facilities. Programs /Quantified Objectives a. Home Energy Upgrade Financing Program The City will pursue the use of energy conservation measures in low- and moderate - income housing through the Home Energy Upgrade Financing Program and the Multifamily Rebate Program sponsored by The Gas Company The Energy Upgrade Program provides for $2,500 to $20,000 to purchase and install energy - efficient upgrades in residential units. The Multi - Family Rebate program provides for cash rebates for the construction of multi- family units with qualified energy efficient products. The financing program is supported by Fannie Mae and administered by Volt VIEWtech. The funds may be used for central air conditioning, furnaces, window and door replacements, roofing, water heaters, fireplace inserts, insulation and other approved uses. Approximately 10 units per year are anticipated to use the program. The Community Development Department will provide flyers and information to City of Lynwood Residents • Responsible Development Services Department Agency: • Financing The Southern California Gas Company Source: • Time Frame: 2000 -2008, until funds depleted. b. Water Conservation Program The City will pursue the use of water conservation measures in low- and moderate - income housing through a toilet replacement program. The City will replace over 200 toilets and make available very low flow water heads for a nominal costs. Page 5 -14 / p J 1 0 Responsible Agency: Financing Source: P Time Frame: City of Lynwood Park Water Company 2000 -2005 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT GOAL 5: Implement the goals, policies and programs in this document within the established time frames, and ensure that they continue to be compatible with the other elements of the General Plan. Policy 5.1 The Housing Element goals, policies and programs will be reviewed to evaluate their effectiveness and appropriateness. Policy 5.2 The Housing Element goals, policies and programs will be reviewed in relation to the other elements of the General Plan, which might impact housing decisions. Policy 5.3 The goals, policies and programs will be modified as necessary, to ensure appropriateness and effectiveness, as well as compatibility with the other elements of the General Plan. Page 5 -15 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Programs /Objectives a. Annual Review of Housing Element The Planning Commission and the City Council will conduct an annual review of the Housing Element Implementation schedule. The review will include the following information: A log of new residential development permits and completion reports; inventory of units built in the Very Low and Low categories, an update or inventory on approved projects; annual estimate of population form the State Department of Finance; and vacant land and zoning survey • Responsible Development Services Department Agency • Financing General Fund Source: • Time Frame: 2000 -2005 b. Income -Level Based Inventory of Units Built To better track the income levels of units built during the planning period and provide a more effective way to track performance during the planning period, the City of Lynwood will include an estimated sales value at time of unit occupancy This value will be included as part of the application to reflect the assumed market value of the home constructed. Responsible Development Services Manager Agency: Financing General Fund Source: Time Frame: On -going C. Publicity and Public Information The City will publicize and make available to residents and property owners information regarding the availability of low - interest loans for property rehabilitation. The City will also continue to publicize information on the availability of grants and low- interest loans for handicapped and elderly households. In addition, the City will continue to work with and aid private developers in expanding housing opportunities in Lynwood. • Responsible Redevelopment Services Agency Agency: • Financing Federal Community Development Source: Block Grants and Redevelopment Agency • Time Frame: Ongoing Page 5 -16 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT C. SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS A summary of the proposed programs objectives is listed in Table 5 -1 Table 5 -Y Planning Very 191 Deleted: Period I Low Low Moderate Deleted: Private Development Goal Income, Income Incornel Deleted: 65 New Construction Emergency Transitional Housing Jand Assembly/ New Total RHNA (adju Rehabilitation Deleted: 30 175 191 Deleted: 35 2 HOME Mort a e Deleted: 20 14 7 -' Deleted: 20 Deleted: RDA 30 Deleted: 170 30 Deleted: a5 I 44 I 22 ' Delet: 60 ed 27 30 Deleted: 65 50 22 50 50 Deleted: Single Family —HOME 87 145 Deleted: 100 43 62 Deleted: 50 I }{ousinq Rehab 3a 13 I 15, 2 HOME Mort a e Rental Rehab 14 7 1 7 HOME Purchase 1 Total I 44 I 22 I 22 Total 5 rinancm4 De eted. 50 Deleted: 700 - Deleted: 250 Deleted: 250 First Time Homebu ers 21 10 11 2 HOME Mort a e 20 10 10 60 ti HOME Purchase 1 7 7 8 Total 5 27 2 22 Conservation Deleted: 200 Deleted: 10 Deleted: 5 Deleted: 5 Energy Upgrades 74 2 2 2 Water Conservation 200 80 60 60 ti Total 27 1 0 8 8 Total Planning Period Goals 100 46 32 22 Source. City of Lynwood, Wagner & Associates, Inc. 2001 and RBF Consulting. 2006 Fvcuhioc Ahnvc tvinrlcrofu mr— Cmcnnni Deleted: 30 Deleted: 15 Deleted: 15 Deleted: 50 Deleted: 20 Deleted: 20 t, Deleted: 10 Deleted: 250 Deleted: 100 Deleted: 80 Deleted: 70 Deleted: 1,150 Deleted: 410 Deleted: 405 Deleted: 335 Page 5 -17 Page 8 [i] Deleted David Bar %20g7 3%5�;'11 ss i 6 0 1 0 1 h 1 00 single - family homes Federal Community Development Block Grants Deferred Loans The City will utilize Federal HOME Program funds to provide deferred loans to eligible homeowners for rehabilitation of their property During the next five fiscal years, an estimated 20 households will be rehabilitated with $100,000 annual allocation. Responsible Community Development Department Agency: Financing Federal Community Development Block Source: Grants Time Frame: 2000 -2005 V2 - E + �� it �a F nl Na' 1 ... Ll'NNVOOD O• HOUSING ELEMENT • �� 9 � i. , � i � � � E-+� � �q Y VaJe4.��g�rMP Imp 1 H Cd "K�l i �u n � Lege P arcels Built Parcels ow HIM 1, I IIL� lam{ _� a� +pmy� II I 1� `iWN(/Q/JrAJPrf'�n "�U A 77 IN 071-41" ma ON ..� vt. ♦� ��. �� ""msCnLH : ^ 7i wo rso a i,wa I r•t 1p UNITS BUILT Exhibit A -1 . EI : '33 AA lac LYNNVOOD il bOtilRe. "� HOUSING ELENFENT l I � n p .;I I r'ir p p g W+15 DL.Wiui4 1 W ®t 1 Qu WI[.S�^ ��7� i1U� LL..WL.L.� WW u I . II � 'll �-7 �v�b-vvvL' rr7�L 09, +un�;m5 ✓'R �-_ wl ��ImPial_HwyE��E ,/i Perim H M WY Legend D I n�� Parcels s 13 u dp Ir 97, n �llPPj__ m�� a � P](CIIS m _. — �'. a � ly . L. 1 C,I Lim,Is III 11 . r ,,M � V M , d ft M O 19, 9 MEN I... rsa o I.,. p FWA Gib ' VACANT LAID Exhibit A -2 LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Legend Parcels Specific Plan l . M. �.._.._ ! Specific Plan Boundary L IC in Lunits O Lwo 750 0 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AREA Exhibit A -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A ADEQUATE SITES ANALYSIS This section evaluates the potential opportunities for various types of residential development for all income levels. The analysis primarily looks at development that could occur based upon the Lynwood General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. More specifically, this section provides an inventory of available vacant and underutilized land for residential development to accommodate the City's fair share of RHNA. State Housing Element Law mandates that a jurisdiction must show that it has adequate sites that will be made available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with the required public services and facilities for a variety of housing types and incomes. This evaluation of adequate sites represents a planning goal and not a goal for the actual production of housing within the five -year period. The City must demonstrate that it has the capacity, or adequate sites, to accommodate the projected need for housing. The projected need for housing used for this evaluation is defined as the City's share of the region's housing needs for 1998 -2005. A. REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT State Housing Element Law requires that each jurisdiction, in preparing its Housing Element, develop local housing programs designed to meet its share of existing and future regional housing needs for all income groups. This requirement ensures that each jurisdiction accepts responsibility for the housing needs of its current and anticipated future residents, particularly lower- income households, and plans for a variety of housing choices. Appendix A -i CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT The State Department of Finance (DOF) is responsible for projecting the total statewide housing demand, with the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) apportioning this demand to each of the state's regions. This demand represents the number of additional units needed to accommodate the anticipated growth in the number of households, to replace expected demolitions and conversions of housing units to non - housing uses, and to achieve a future vacancy rate that allows for healthy functioning of the housing market. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Council of Governments (COG) representing the region, in cooperation with the local jurisdictions, is tasked with the responsibility of allocating the region's projected new housing demand to each jurisdiction. The allocation is further divided into four income categories: • Very-Low Income — 0% to 50% of the median income; • Low - Income — 51 % to 80% of the median income; • Moderate- Income — 81 % to 120% of the median income; and, • Above Moderate Income — more than 120% of the median income. This process is known as the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), and the goals are referred to as either the RHNA goals or the "regional share' goals for new housing construction. The allocation takes into account factors such as market demand for housing, employment opportunities, the availability of suitable sites and public facilities, commuting patterns, type and tenure of housing need, and others. In determining a jurisdiction's share of new housing needs by income category, the allocation is adjusted to avoid an over - concentration of lower income households in any one jurisdiction. A Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared by SCAG in allocated housing needs for the period beginning January 1, 1998 to June 30, 2005 (a 7 1 /2 year period) identifies the City of Lynwood's share of the region's housing needs as 979 new housing units. To determine the regional housing needs for the 1998 -2005 planning period, the needs are adjusted by the actual number of units constructed from January 1, 1998 to the current period, or a total of 595 housing units. Exhibit A -1 provides a summary of the location of constructed units. Based upon this adjustment, the regional housing needs for 1998 -2005 is 383 housing units, with 74% allocated for very low- and low- income households. Appendix A -ii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Insert Exhibit A -1 Map of Units Built Appendix A -iii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table A -1 Adjusted RHNA Allocations Income Level 1998 -2005 Construction Adjusted RHNA RHNA Need Achievements' Need Very Low 277 36 2 241 Low 175 9-3 CUP units _ R 125 27 -3 SW units _ -- Moderate 191 15 R -2 SPR units • 41 6 R -2 CUP units �50 R -1 SPR units _ _ _ _' Above Moderate 335 27 R -1 CUP - units '166- _ 29 unknown SPR 63 unkown CUP Total 978 L46 units_ _ _ _ - _ _ - ,448 (Votes: 1 Based on actual occupancies and fully entitled croiects through December 31, 2006. Does not Include projects currently in the review and entitlement process. Refer to Table A -4 for additional o ects. 2 Includes SELAC project, redwood homes and projects completed from 1998 -2000 SELAC is under construction. 3 Construction estimates are based on actual project constructed Units with unknown income categories are assumed in the Above Moderate category. 4. Summary of actual units constructed or fully entitled are provided in Appendix 8 of this Housing As required by State Housing Law, the City must plan for its share of the region's new housing needs in all four income categories by identifying an adequate supply of land zoned at the appropriate density levels to accommodate each income category The RHNA goals do not represent a requirement for actual housing production, but rather seek to ensure the City has, or plans to add, zoning capacity to accommodate new housing growth. To address the City's needs for very low- and low- income housing, Lynwood must demonstrate that it has an adequate supply of land for higher density housing (30 or more dwelling units per acre). Although zoning land for higher density development does not guarantee the construction of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate - income families, without such higher density zoning, the opportunity to use subsidies and implement affordable housing programs for such families would not exist. Capacity to Meet Regional Share Goals To enable the City of Lynwood to meeting RHNA construction goals, the city must evaluate its capacity to meeting this need with existing development capacities and credits for construction occurring since 1998. Lynwood is a built out community, with minimal areas of substantial vacant land. The majority of vacant land is a result of remnant parcels , Appendix A -iv CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT from right -of -way acquisitions, and sparsely located residential and commercial lots. As shown in Table A -2, the City of Lynwood Municipal Code identifies three residential land use classifications. Additionally, the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan will introduce an additional land use density standard of 30 du /ac, as amended. The availability of land suited to accommodate the various income levels is based upon the allowed density Table A -2 City of Lynwood Residential Land Use Densities Income Level Zoning District Densit Very Low Low Specific Plan R -3 Multi - Family 30 units per acre 18 units per acre Moderate R -2 Condominium, Townhouse, Multi-famil 14 units per acre Above Moderate R -1 Single Family 7 units per acre a. Vacant Land Resources The City of Lynwood has very limited vacant land resources to provide opportunities for residential development. There are approximately 35 vacant parcels in the City of Lynwood. The majority of which are located within existing residential neighborhoods, or along the City's commercial corridors. All of the vacant parcels are within existing developed areas providing the necessary level of municipal services (water, sewer, etc.). Table A -3 and Exhibit A -2 illustrates the vacant lands within the City of Lynwood. Table A -3 Analvsis of Vacant Parcels APN Zone Acres Estimated Units 2 6186 - 001 -007 CB1 0.06 6189- 013 -900 C131 0.24 6189- 019 -900 C131 028 6189- 019 -901 R3 024 4 6189- 019 -902 R3 0.25 4 6175 - 002 -028 R3 0.26 4 6175- 002 -005 R3 0.10 1 6169 - 004 -012 R3 0.06 1 6188 - 002 -031 R3 0.15 2 6186- 012 -033 C131 0.54 - 6186- 013 -005 R3 0.22 3 6171 -013 -044 R3 0.21 3 Appendix A -v CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table A -3 Analysis of Vacant Parcels APN Zone Acres Estimated Units 2 6171 - 013 -045 R3 0.21 3 6171 - 013 -046 R3 0.21 3 6191 - 014 -001 R3 0.40 7 6189 - 009 -900 R1 0.10 1 6174 - 008 -901 All 0.84 5 6174- 008 -902 R1 0.12 1 6174 - 008 -043 R1 0.07 2 6174 - 009 -901 R1 0.36 6 6175- 006 -900 R3 0.36 5 6168- 009 -031 C2A 0.16 4 6191- 008 -012 C2A 0.16 4 6191 - 005 -023 C2A 0.39 11 6191 - 005 -022 C2A 0.19 5 6191- 005 -021 C2A 0.54 16 6207 - 009 -020 C3 014 4 6170- 029 -028 C3 0.05 - 6188- 005 -016 M 0.40 - 6188- 006 -023 M 0.52 - 6186- 012 -007 CB1 0.27 - 6193- 013 -012 C3 0.11 - 6173- 008 -029 R3 0.13 2 6173 - 008 -030 R3 0.09 1 6173 - 008 -009 R3 0.16 2 Total '104 dwelling units' Notes ' Parcel is within the boundaries of the proposed Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan ' Based upon existing density standards in City's Zoning Code. Includes vacant land jn Specific Plan area. See Table A -5 - Veletec Appendix AM CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Insert Exhibit A -2: Map of Vacant Land Appendix A -vii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Based upon the City's existing available land, there is insufficient vacant land to meet the need of future through the development of vacant land. It is assumed the remaining potential of 104 dwelling units will be comprised of market -rate residential units. b. Current Projects The City of Lynwood Redevelopment Agency has been aggressively pursuing the cooperative development of residential units within the City A number of successful projects have already been implemented and the City is in the final stages of entitlements /negotiations with a variety of developers to construct a number of market -rate and affordable units. The City's has recently adopted an inclusionary requirement for projects consisting of 7 or more units and provides financial and programmatic assistance to the development community for the development of affordable units. The City currently has a number of "in the pipeline" projects in the final entitlement stages, as shown in Table A -4 below A total of 428 single - family and 15 multi - family units are expected to be constructed, with 105 of those units providing affordability restrictions. Table A -4 City of Lynwood Residential Project's `7n the Pipeline" Project Total Affordable Name Units Units Status Whispering Glenn 39 Single Family 9 Site assembly underway Casa Grande 120 Single Family 24 Feasibility study underwa Lynwood Auto Plaza 200 Single Family 40 Final DDA negotiations Fernwood Estates 43 Single Family 5 DDA complete Mobile Home Park 4 Condo 4 Application in pr ocess Redwood Homes 9 Single Family 3 Project Complete Bullis / Fernwood 11 Single Family 3 DDA Negotiations w/ RDA Muriel Estates 6 Single Family 6 Final Developer Ne otiations SELAC Senior 15 Multi Family 15 Under Construction Total 428 Single 109 units Family 15 Multi Famil C. Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan The City of Lynwood has recently adopted the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. The Specific Plan provides the regulatory standards for the development of residential densities up to 30 dwelling units per acre. Appendix A -viii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Based on initial development interest in the area and the recent trends in higher density residential mixed -use projects, Table A -5 provides a summary of the development potential within the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. Exhibit A -3 provides a summary of the geographic boundaries of the Specific Plan. Table A -5 Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Residential Development Potential Notes: 1 Based on theoretical buildout of area based on existing zoning standards in Specific Plan area. 2 Assumes a conservative estimate of 25% of acreage to be built out as residential. Table A -6 Comparison of RHNA Allocations to Specific Plan Buildout Estimates Income Level 1998 -2005 RHNA Need Estimated Specific Plan Buildout Buildout Assumed Specific Plan Village Density Acreage 277 Maximum Low 175 1 033 potential' 191 1033 Above Moderate 335 1 033 Buildout Village One 30 du /ac 27.01 810 units 202 units Village Two 30 du /ac 81.04 2,442 units 610 units Village Three 30 du /ac 4.7 141 units 35 units Village Four 30 du /ac 24.8 744 units 186 units Total 137.99 4,137 units 1 1,033 units Notes: 1 Based on theoretical buildout of area based on existing zoning standards in Specific Plan area. 2 Assumes a conservative estimate of 25% of acreage to be built out as residential. Table A -6 Comparison of RHNA Allocations to Specific Plan Buildout Estimates Income Level 1998 -2005 RHNA Need Estimated Specific Plan Buildout Potential based on Income Cate o 1 Very Low 277 1 033 Low 175 1 033 Moderate 191 1033 Above Moderate 335 1 033 Total 978 1 033 Appendix A -ix development projects fully entitled. To ensure there are adequate development without giving credit to units built the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, an evaluation of the capacity by income category of the Specific Plan compared to the 1998 -2005 RHNA was conducted. Table A -6 provides a summary of this analysis CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Insert Exhibit A -3• Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Appendix A -x ;ITI 0; Yi4y9'00L fELECIIrC: 'u APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF UNITS BUILT IN THE PLANNING PERIOD This section provides a summary of units constructed during the planning period. The units identified in this section are actual units built, by residential zoning classification. Distribution of these units into affordability categories are provided in Appendix A of the Housing Element. Appendix B -i ,HCOUJNiG EtL.i ;FUBETA F APN SPR Project Address Zoning Square Total 1600 No. Units Acrea e 0.036655212 j Footage 1600 6175 -009 -029 98-09 3571 L nwood Rd R -1 1 98 -25 3937 Carlin Ave n -1 1295 1295 2 0.029667812 99 -07 2723 109th St R -1 2290 2290 1 0.052462772 99 -08 3228 Pleasant R -1 0 99 -13 12502 Ed brook R -1 1 0 99 -27 11419 Pear Ave R -1 1529 1529 1 0.035028637 2000 -02 Ed ebrook- Philli s Lot 2 R -1 1500 1500 0.034364261 2000 -03 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 3 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -04 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 4 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -05 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 5 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -06 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 6 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -07 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 7 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -08 Ed brook - Philli s Lola R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -09 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 9 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -10 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 10 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000-11 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 11 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -12 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 12 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -13 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 13 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -14 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 14 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -15 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 15 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -16 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 16 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -17 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 17 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364261 2000 -18 Muriel /Louise R -1 1200 1200 1 0.027491409 6171- 012 -054 2001 -02 3180 Redwood R -1 1275 1275 1 0.029209622 6171- 012 -054 2001 -03 3188 Redwood R -1 1275 1275 1 0029209622 6189 - 011 -902 2001 -14 4353 Fernwood R -1 1327 1327 1 0.030400916 6189 - 011 -902 2001 -15 4357 Fernwood R -1 1327 1327 1 0.030400916 6189 -011 -902 2001 -16 4361 Fernwood R -1 1327 1327 1 0.030400916 6174 - 016 -006 2001 -18 4032 Vir inia R -1 1596 1596 1 0.036563574 6171- 012 -049 2002 -02 3162 Redwood R -1 1582 1582 1 0.036242841 6171- 012 -046 2002 -11 3166 Redwood R -1 1596 1596 1 0.036563574 2003 -04 3931 Louise Ave R -1 1028 1028 1 0.023550974 6174- 009 -025 2003 -25 4044 Louise St R -1 825 825 0.018900344 2003 -29 11219 Linden R -1 0 6175 - 013 -011 2004 -01 3663 Virginia R -1 760 760 0.017411226 6175- 021 -033 2005 -26 3557 Ma nolia R -1 745 745 1 0.017067583 6174- 023 -016 2005 -28 12008 Cornish R -1 1728 1728 1 0.039587629 6170 - 014 -049 2006 -08 2709108th R -1 1695 1695 1 0.038831615 6175 - 022 -003 2006 -11 3576 Magnolia R -1 2600 2600 1 0.059564719 6173 - 026 -026 2006 -15 3633 Walnut Avenue R -1 16071 16071 1 0.368178694 6174 - 009 -002 2006 -18 4008 Louise R -1 880 880 1 0.020160367 6171- 019 -029 2006 -21 3115 Josephine R -1 960 960 1 0.021993127 6177- 003 -009 2006 -26 3550 Euclid R -1 842 842 1 0.019289805 6170- 038 -031 2006 -27 3124 Oakwood Ave R -1 1000 1000 1 0.022909507 6171- 018 -030 2006 -30 3145 Louise R -1 762 762 1 0.017457045 6188- 025 -030 2006 -31 12634 Wri th Road R -1 1834 1834 1 0.042016037 6174 - 010 -005 2006 -32 3926 Louise R -1 589 589 1 0.0134937 6186- 021 -041 2006 -38 4111 McMillan R -1 750/918 1668 2 0.038213058 6170 - 007 -007 2006 -40 2610 Norton R -1 1915 1 1915 1 0.043871707 6188 - 024 -024 2006 -43 5432 Olanda R -1 2326 2326 1 0.053287514 6170 - 008 -023 2006 -44 2614 112th R -1 1453 1453 1 0.033287514 6174 - 003 -001 2006 -45 3565 Louise R -1 1176 1176 1 0.026941581 6187 -0110 - 2006 -51 13519 Platt Ave c WE�A u'?I�GZ ,r,R -1 1176 1176 TTO,TAL�UNITS 1 50€ 0.026941581 - [' r> i APN SPR Pro'ect Address Zoning Square Total No. Units Acreage Foota 6169- 007 -013 2003 -12 11431 Plum R -2 2280 2280 0.052233677 6186- 040 -011 2005 -22 5238 Lavinia Ave R -2 2428 2428 1 0.055624284 6189- 037 -006 2005 -25 5156 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd R -2 1470 1470 1 0.033676976 6186 - 024 -022 2005 -27 4339 McMillan R -2 873 873 1 0.02 6186- 041 -014 2005 -29 5259 Clark St R -2 1276 1276 1 0029232532 6189- 014 -019 2005 -34 11745 Third St_ R -2 1040 1040 1 0.023825888 6186- 022 -027 2006 -10 12706 Waldorf R -2 750 750 1 0.017182131 6173 - 023 - 015,2006 -12 3617 Platt R -2 774 _ 774 1' 0.017731959 6189- 029 -011 2006 -16 11612 El Granada R -2 1400 1400 1 0.03207331 6194- 007 -007 2006 -19 11022 Pope Ave R -2 1379 1379 1 0.031592211 6186 - 022 -030 2006 -22 12632 Waldorr R -2 1026 1026 1 0.023505155 6186- 021 -031 2006 -33 12723 Wladorf R -2 1157 1157 1 0.0265063 019 -027 2006 -37 11259 Virginia R -2 1930 1930 1 0.044215349 6173- 023 -008 2006 -39 3651 Platt R -2 953 6197- 953 1 0.021832761 6175- 011 -016 W 2006 -48 3560 Josephine R -2 898 898 1 0.020572738 6169- 007 -016 2006 -49 11445 Plum R -2 0 0 0 0 6177 -002 015 2006 50 3532 Palm R-2 1230 1230 1 0.028178694 i m, "y 'dkr (S,- e,� T.OTAL r t 4 . '4 p" A_PN SPR P ro'ect Addre ionin Square Tota No. A e Fo� otage_ 2003 -01 3251 Flower R -3 2280 2280 _ Units 1 0052233677 6191 -005 -006 2005 -21 3328 Elizabeth R -3 918 918 1 0.021030928 6194- 024 -029 2005 -23 11353 Wri ht Road R -3 1600 1600 1 0.036655212 6189- 021 -007 2005 -24 11856 Pope Ave R -3 1858 1858 1 0.042565865 6169 - 004 -010 2005 -30 2978 Fernwood Lot 12 R -3 1569 1569 1 0.035945017 6169 - 004 -030 2005 -31 2978 Fernwood Lot 13 R -3 1569 1569 1 0035945017 6169- 004 -031 2005 -32 2978 Fernwood Lot 14 R -3 1569 1569 1 0.035945017 6169- 004 -012 2005 -33 2978 Fernwood Lot 14 R -3 1569 1569 1 0.035945017 6188 - 010 -023 2005 -35 11839 Louise Ave R -3 907/726 1633 1 0.037411226 6173- 017 -006 2005 -36 11021 Bullis Rd R -3 880 880 1 0.020160367 6168 - 012 -018 2006 -01 12151 Louise Ave R -3 1229 1 1229 1 0.028155785 6176 - 001 -028 2006 -06 3251 Flower St R -3 1221/11961 2417 2 0.055372279 6188- 011 -013 2006 -07 Louise Ave R -3 697/1140 1837 1 0.042084765 6170 - 033 -021 2006 -09 10788 Barlow R -3 2315 2315 1 0.05303551 6171- 017 -004 2006 -13 3114 Flower R -3 742 742 1 0.016998855 6171 - 012 -040 2006 -17 3147 Flower R -3 2981 2981 2 0.068293242 6173- 012 -023 2006 -20 3557 Sanborn R -3 2000 4000 2 0.09163803 6176- 012 -032 2006 -23 12414 Aline R -3 1740 1740 1 0.039862543 6188 - 017 -016 2006 -24 12119 Wilson_ R -3 1924 1924 1 0.044077892 6168 - 012 -010 2006 -25 12115 Aline R -3 1188 1188 1 0.027216495 6191 - 003 -002 2006 -34 3399 Elizabeth R -3 1454 1454 1 0.033310424 6186- 010 -007 2006 -35 4237 Fernwood R -3 1562 1562 1 0.035784651 6188 - 009 -020, 2006 -36 11845 Wilson R -3 1120 1120 1 0.025658648 6188 - 016 -002 2006 -42 12110 Wilson R -3 1730 1730 1 0.039633448 3 -,. `;" a,E ;.'- .y`.•'' h.::;?�.Fn;: r,> -- ''.may.: TAL.LZ aat27:= :..r.,. " ; Appendix B -iv i� h ._`I i�P t "'lea AP SPR Proiect Address Zon_>q SgUare Total No. Units Acreaqe Footaqe 98 -10 3577 Lynwood Rd 1 0 98 -11 3587 Lynwood Rd 1 0 98 -12 3589 Lynwood Rd 1 0 98 -13 3595 Lynwood Rd 1 0 98 -14 3597 Lynwood Rd 1 0 98 -15 3601 Lynwood Rd 1 0 98 -16 3605 L nwood Rd 1 0 98 -24 3935 Louise St 1 0 • 98 -28 11738 First Ave 10310 10310 1 0.236197022 98 -29 11730 First Ave 1 0 99 -12 12504 Ed brook 1 0 99 -14 11932 State St 1491 1491 1 0.034158076 99 -15 11936 State St 1485 1485 1 0.034020619 99 -16 3107 Weber Ave 1485 1485 1 0.034020619 99 -17 3109 Weber Ave 1485 1485 1 0.034020619 99 -18 3111 Weber Ave 1485 1485 1 0.034020619 99 -19 3113 Weber Ave 1491 1491 1 0.034158076 99 -20 '4031 Vir iniaAve 1 0 ' 2001 -20 11700 Muriel 1 0 2001 -21 11704 Muriel 1 0 2001 -22 11708 Muriel 1 0 2001 -23 11709 Thorson 1 0 2001 -24 11705 Thorson 1 _ 0 2001 -25 11701 Thorson 1 0 6189 - 028 -052 2001 -30 11670 Pope 2759 2759 1 0.063207331 2001 -31 4050 Louise 1200 1200 1 0.027491409 2001 -39 3690 Lynwood Rd 1695 1695 1 0.038831615 6189 - 028 -051 2002 -03 11700 Pope Avenue 1640 1640 1 0.037571592 6174 - 009 -025 2002 -12 4044 Louise St 1687 1687 1 0.038648339 2003 -05 11431 Plum 1 0 2003 -07 5137 Walnut Ave 1 0 6171 -013 -048 2003 -11 Flower /Peach 1947 1947 1 0.044604811 6175- 021 -013 2003 -21 3581 Magnolia 1058 1058 1 0.024238259 2003 -24 11431 Plum 1 0 6170 - 020 -026 2004 -06 2918 Beechwood 1172 1172 1 0.026849943 6193- 011 -013 2004 -07 11175 Elm St 1783 1783 1 0.040847652 6171 - 023 -030 2004 -10 3359Jose hine 1967 1967 1 0.045063001 6171- 022 -027 2004 -16 3313 Louise 1055 1055 1 0.02416953 6189 - 001 -009 2004 -18 4229 Platt Ave 1284 1284 1 0.029415808 6175- 022 -027 2004 -19 3561 Burton Ave 2637, 2637 1 0.060412371 2005 -02 3511 Burton Ave 1200 1200 1. 0.027491409 6168- 021 -002 2005 -09 3362 Magnolia 844 844 1 0.019335624 6193- 012 -018 2005 -10 11162 Elm St 1194 1194 1 0.027353952 6169- 008 -028 2005 -11 3056 Redwood Ave 1600 1600 1 0.036655212 6173- 008 -001 2005 -12 3556 Mulford Ave 1415 1415 1 0.032416953 6176- 010 -028 2005 -16 3118 Carlin Ave 1275 1275 1 0.029209622 6191 - 021.019 2005 -17 10927 San Vicente 960 960 1 0.021993127 Appendix B -v Rd F•` '.`.TOTAL r 1 1 0.01 Appendix B -vi .- ° -;<� -- f" "; 6175- 006 -012 2005 -20 3665' 2006 -29 11021 Rd F•` '.`.TOTAL r 1 1 0.01 Appendix B -vi APN SPR Project Address Zonin Square _ Footage Total No. Units A_ crea e 6175- 009 -029 98 -09 3571 Lynwood Rd R -1 1600 1600 1 0.036655 98 -25 3937 Carlin Ave R -1 1295 1295 2 0.029668 99 -07 2723 109th St R -1 - 2290 2290 1 0052463 99 -08 3228 Pleasant R -1 0 99 -13 12502 Ed brook R -1 1 0 99 -27 11419 Pear Ave R -1 1529 1529 1 0.035029 2000 -02 Ed ebrook- Philli s Lot 2 R -1 1500 1500 0.034364 2000 -03 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 3 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -04 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 4 R -i 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -05 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 5 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -06 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 6 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -07 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 7 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -08 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 8 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -09 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 9 R -1 1500 1500 1 0034364 2000 -10 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 10 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -11 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 11 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -12 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 12 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -13 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 13 R -1 .1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -14 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 14 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -15 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 15 - R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -16 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 16 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -17 Ed brook - Philli s Lot 17 R -1 1500 1500 1 0.034364 2000 -18 Muriel /Louise R -1 1200 1200 1 0.027491 6171 - 012 -054 2001 -02 3180 Redwood R -1 1275 1275 1 0.02921 6171- 012 -054 2001 -03 3188 Redwood R -1 1275 1275 1 0.02921 6189 - 011 -902 2001 -14 4353 Fernwood R -1 1327 1327 1 0.030401 6189- 011 -902 2001 -15 4357 Fernwood R -1 1327 1327 1 0.030401 6189- 011 -902 2001 -16 4361 Fernwood R -1 1327 1327 1 0.030401 6174- 016 -006 2001 -18 4032 Virginia R -1 1596 1596 1 0.036564 6171- 012 -049 2002 -02 3162 Redwood R -1 1582 1582 1 0.036243 6171- 012 -046 2002 -11 3166 Redwood R -1 1596 1596 1 0.036564 2003 -04 3931 Louise Ave R -1 1028 1028 1 0.023551 ,6174- 009 -025 2003 -25 '4044 Louise St R -1 825 825 0.0189 2003 -29 11219 Linden R -1 0 6175- 013 -011 2004 -01 3663 Virginia R -1 760 760 0.017411 6175- 021 -033 2005 -26 3557 Ma nolia R -1 745 745 1 0.017068 '6174- 023 -016 2005 -28 12008 Cornish R -1 1728 1728 1 0.039588 6170- 014 -049, 2006 -08 2709108th R -1 1695 1695 1 0 038832 6175- 022 - 003 2006 -11 3576 Magnolia R -1 2600 2600 1 0.059565 :6173 - 026 -026 2006 -15 3633 Walnut Avenue R -1 16071 16071 1 0.368179 ` 6 174- 009 -002 2006 -18 4008 Louise R -1 880 880 1 0.02016 ; 019 -029 2006 -21 3115 Josephine R -1 960 960 1 0.021993 1 6 177- 003 -009 2006 -26 3550 Euclid R -1 842 842 1 001929 ;, -038 -031 2006 -27 3124 Oakwood Ave R -1 1000 1000 1 0.02291 Appendix B -vii 6171 - 018 -030 2006 -30 3145 Louise R -1 762 762 1 0.017457 6188 - 025 -030 2006 -31 12634 Wnc Road R -1 1834 1834 1 0.042016 6174 - 010 -005 2006 -32 3926 Louise R -1 589 589 1 0.013494 6186- 021 -041 2006 -38 4111 McMillan R -1 750/918 1668 2 0.038213 6170 - 007 -007 2006 -40 2610 Norton R -1 1915 1915 1 0.043872 6188 - 024 -024 2006 -43 5432 Olanda R -1 2326 2326 1 0.053288 6170 - 008 -023 2006 -44 2614 112th R -1 1453 1453 1 0.033288 6174 - 003 -001 2006 -45 3565 Louise R -1 1176 1176 1 0.026942 6187- 010 -020 2006 -51 3519 Platt Ave R -1 1176 1176 1 0.026942 6169- 007 -013 2003 -12 11431 Plum R -2 2280 2280 0.052234 6186- 040 -011 2005 -22 5238 Lavinia Ave R -2 2428 2428 1 0.055624 6189 - 037 -006 2005 -25 5156 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd R -2 1470 1470 1 0.033677 6186 - 024 -022 2005 -27 4339 McMillan R -2 873 873 1 0.02 .6186- 041 -014 2005 -29 5259 Clark St R -2 1276 1276 1 0.029233 6189 - 014 -019 2005 -34 11745 Third St R -2 1040 1040 1 0.023826 6186- 022 -027 2006 -10 12706 Waldorf R -2 750 750 1 0.017182 6173- 023 -015 2006 -12 3617 Platt R -2 774 774 1 0.017732 6189- 029 -011 2006 -16 11612 El Granada R -2 1400 1400 1 0.032073 6194 - 007 -007 2006 -19 11022 Pope Ave R -2 1379 1379 1 0.031592 188 -009 -020 2006 -36 1118 W 188- 016 -002 2006 -42 12110 W Rcl Rd 98 -16 13605 Lynwood I $ 98 -24 3935 Louse St E it 98 -28 11738 First Ave 98-29 11730 First Ave ;• r 99 -12 12504 Ed brook 99 -14 11932 State St ` 99 -15 11936 State St 2001 -31 4 4050 Louise 99 -16 3107 Weber AVE F1 99 -17 3109 Weber Ave ' 99 -18 3111 Weber Ave t T1 99 -19 3113 Weber Ave a — 99 -2 0 14031 Virginia Avi 189- 028 -051 2002 -03 11700 Po e A- 1 74-009-025 2002 -12 4044 Louise St 2003 -05 11431 Plum . 2003 -07 5137 Walnut AV 171- 013 -048 2003 -11 Flower /Peach 1 75- 021 -013 2003 -21 3581 Ma nolia 2003 -24 131 PI 14 um 1 70- 020 -026 2004 -06 2918 Be echwoo 1 93- 011 -013 2004 -07 11175 Elm St 17 1- 023 -030 2004 -10 3359 Jose hine 17 1- 022 -027 2004 -16 3313 Louise I89- 001 -009 2004 -18 4229 Platt Ave 7 5- 022 -027 2004 -19 3561 Burton Ave 2005 -02 3511 Burton Ave 6 8-021 -002 2005 -09 3362 Ma nolia 93 - 012 -018 2005 -10 11162 Elm — 69- 008 -028 2005 -11 3056 Redwood A , -008- 2005 -12 3556 Mulford Ave 76 -010 -028 2005 -16 3118 Carlin Ave R -3 1120 1120 1 0 0T"(' .99 R -3 1730 1 1730 1 0.0396.9.4 10 10310 1 1491 1 1485 1 1485 1 1491 1 1 WIAR7 1058 1 1058 1172 1172 12 1783 1783 1967 1967 1055 1055 1284 84 194 1194 S00 1600 415 1415 ?75 127.9 0.0241 .02941 .06041 02749 01933 1 Appendix B -ix 2001 -21 1 11704 Mu riel 2001 -22 1 11708 Muriel 2001 -23 1 11709 Thorson 2001 -24 1 11705 Thorson 2001 -25 1 11701 Thorson '189- 028 -052 2 2001 -30 1 11670 Po - 2001 -31 4 4050 Louise 2001 -39 3 3690 Lynwood 1 R -3 1120 1120 1 0 0T"(' .99 R -3 1730 1 1730 1 0.0396.9.4 10 10310 1 1491 1 1485 1 1485 1 1491 1 1 WIAR7 1058 1 1058 1172 1172 12 1783 1783 1967 1967 1055 1055 1284 84 194 1194 S00 1600 415 1415 ?75 127.9 0.0241 .02941 .06041 02749 01933 1 Appendix B -ix 1058 1 1058 1172 1172 12 1783 1783 1967 1967 1055 1055 1284 84 194 1194 S00 1600 415 1415 ?75 127.9 0.0241 .02941 .06041 02749 01933 1 Appendix B -ix y I\t Vv 3 r GITY O I L" ELIE I.:- Appendix B-xi Appendix B-xii Appendix B-xiii (:f i OF i YM O(.)D APN SPR Pro'ect Address Zonin S ware Foota a Total No. Uni_t_s Acrea e 99 -03 11730 First Ave 1 0 99 -05 11738 First Ave 1 0 99 -07 11311 Louise Ave 4 0 99 -13 4283 Carlin 9 0 99 -17 3148 El Segundo 2 0 2000 -06 3541 Fernwood 0 2001 -07 11445 Plum 0 6189- 019 -056 2002 -13 6 0 2002 -24 11016 Pope Ave 0 2003 -32 3181 Carlin 2 0 6171 - 013 -047 2003 -33 3251 Flower 1221/1196 2417 2 0.055372 2003 -25 3545 Mulford 4 0 2004 -04 12519 Harris 1 0 6189- 021 -010 2005 -20 11856 Poe 1628 1628 2 0.037297 2005 -21 4307 Carlin 14 0 2005 -27 3352 Elizabeth 4 0 2005 -28 10820 Atlantic Ave 0 t . xF� .•_>�'Y.t 2006 -18 110695 Wright Road ea; i �'eR5'- �. =.t, U � .�'py� .. .�, lea 11 # � i k { e'r`r ;�r�5,a2} CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX C REVIEW OF PREVIOUS HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS This Appendix provides a comprehensive review of the previous Housing Element Programs. The intent of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of programs contained within the prior Housing Element in order to adjust policy actions that will improve the likelihood of program implementation for the 1998 -2005 Housing Element. Appendix C -i CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT This page intentionally left blank. Appendix C -ii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table C -1 Review of Housing Element Past Performance Progress in 1. Density Bonus Program Provide Density Bonus for up to 10 dwelling units per year No progress in implementation 2. Century Freeway Replacement 3. CDBG /HOM Rehabilitation Replace units lost due to the development of the 105 Freeway Replace 193 lost units. Utilization of CDBG funds for rehabilitation of substandard units through rehab grant and loan programs The City of Lynwood has replaced almost all remaining parcels or is in the process of entitlement of a remainder of these The City developed a formalized rehab grant and loan program and has provided grants and loans to residents. An average 20 units have been assisted to Programs The Density Bonus program was a voluntary program, without the benefit of clearly articulated policy for the granting of density bonuses. With the codifying of Ordinance #1563, this ordinance now provides greater incentive to the development community through clearly articulated policies and requirements. The city will continue to aggressively find private development interest in the use of the parcels for residential development. As these efforts have been successful, this program can be absorbed into existing citywide efforts for in -fill housing. Continue to work aggressively through more intensive outreach to the community to ensure the public is aware of the availability of these funds. Although funds are available, the City has not been able to expend all funds as required. The City will seek to provide higher profile marketing of available programs through affirmative marketing measures as required by the HOME Program. Appendix C -iii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table C -1 Review of Housing Element Past Performance Previous Housing Description Progress in Suggested revisions to Programs Element Program Implementation 4. Section 8 Continue to support the Los Currently approximately 490 The Section 8 program is dependent on congressional Angeles County Section 8 persons are provided with funding allocations and change over the years. The City Rental Assistance Program Section 8 Rental Assistance will continue to work with Los Angeles County for the in the City of Lynwood. provision of Section 8 within the City of Lynwood. 5: Demolition Control Control Demolition of Demolition existing units i Appendix C -iv CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table C -1 Review of Housing Element Past Performance Previous Housing Description Progress in Suggested revisions to Programs Element Program Implementation 6. Code Enforcement Expand Code Enforcement During the prior Housing Continue to utilize CDBG funding for the enhancement of activities to address Element Planning Period, the Code Enforcement program. Seek to provide clearly substandard units, units in 2,483 units were estimated defined geographic target areas for the proactive need of rehab and units in as substandard, 1,961 units enforcement of code violations. need of replacement in need of rehab and 522 units in need of replacement. Each of these conditions have been improved over the current period. It is estimated that the number of substandard units has been reduced to 2,200, units suitable for rehabilitation have been reduced to 1,800, and units in need of replacement have been reduced to 450 units. 7 Fair Housing Establish Contract with Fair Contract for service is Continue to coordinate with the Fair Housing Council Housing complete through provisions of services within the City of Lynwood. Appendix C -v CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table C -1 Review of Housing Element Past Performance Previous Housing Description Progress in Suggested revisions to Programs Element Program Implementation 8. Elderly Housing Construction of 30 units in 3 Construction of 15 units in No units were constructed during the previous planning years the SELAC Project are period. Based on the new inclusionary requirements, currently underway density bonus provisions, the Long Beach Boulevard Additionally, substantial Specific Plan, redevelopment agency participation and achievements in second current development interest, the City believes that units have assisted in the additional elderly housing will be built over the next five development of elderly years. housing. 9. Shared Housing 10. Homeless Shelter Provide homeless services Through the establishment Continue to expand the availability of homeless services and shelter to 25 -30 person of Truevine this objective through geographic distribution of facilities to serve the p er day has been met. entire Cit Appendix C -vi CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT This page intentionally left blank. Appendix C -vii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX D HISTORICAL HOUSING SALES DATA This section supplements the analysis conducted in the December 2001 Draft Housing Element by evaluating actual sales prices for units described in Appendix D of the December 2001 draft housing element. The actual sales prices provides for an estimation of the income categories for developed projects new housing construction during the 1998 -2005 planning period. A. SALES PRICE TRENDS Table D -1 provides a summary of sales prices occurring during the planning period for the 1998 -2005 Housing Element. Sales prices that fall are below the estimated threshold for Low Income ( <$156,000) are shown in bold typeface. Sales in this range on average are less than 1,500 square feet in size. Sales history is based on available county assessors sales data. Table D -1 Sales Price Trends' 2000 Listing Address Square Feet Number Bed /Bath Sales History 5274 Lavinia Ave 817 2/1 10/16/00 155,000 12017 3` Ave 588 2/1 12/26/00: 55,000 4308 Agnes Ave 456 1/1 3/16/01 89,000 11800 Esther St 868 2/1 11/08/04 280,000 10741 Os ood Ave 755 2/1 11/22/00: 115,000 2705 108` St 720 2/1 8/25/00' 114,000 10985 Duncan Ave 520 1 1/1 1 2/2/01 110,000 3327 Cedar Ave 913 2/1 1 9/27/00: 110,000 12522 Oak St 1052 3/2 1 10/5/00: 118,000 Appendix Di CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table D -1 Sales Price Trends' 2000 Listing Address Square Feet Number Bed /Bath Sales Histor 3606 Walnut Ave 676 2/1 3/21/02: 128,000 3320 Lynwood Rd 657 2/1 8/6/02: 113,500 3200 Cedar 896 211 N/A 10756 State St 896 2/1 5/25/00 122,000 4/12/00 105,712 3564 Jose hine 1397 2/1 5/25/01 123,000 10/27/03: 195,000 2661 108` St 1103 2/1 4/28/04 220,000 2906 Poplar Dr 616 2/1 11/22/00 117,000 3/3/04 170,000 3216 Pleasant St 1298 3/2 7/7/00: 141,539 10/3/00 150,000 2623 Norton Ave 616 2/1 12/12/00: 118,000 5/15/02: 142,500 3116 Poplar Dr 841 3/1 6/1/01 127,000 4523 Arlington 843 2/1 10/2/99' 95,000 8/28/00: 130,000 6/4/04 250,000 4207 Los Flores Blvd 1068 2/1 11/2/06 130,000 3/20/02: 155,000 11609 Ester St 1492 2/2 5/8/01 117,145 9/24/01 118,500 3616 Platt Ave 925 2/1 75 1/3/02: 143,149 1/15/03: 151,000 3128 Redwood Ave 990 3/1 N/A 5504 Cortland St 1497 1/1 N/A 11194 California Ave 1128 2/1 N/A 3867 Walnut Ave 918 2/1 4/12/01 134,000 5/6/03: 205,000 12033 Harris Ave 1160 2/1 9/28/99 78,000 4/26/01 136,000 4227 Cortland St 918 2/1 2/08/01 130,000 120242 d Ave 804 3/1 3/17/00: 94,959 6/13/00 97,500 10/6/00: 144,000 11034 Virginia 1176 3/2 2/7/01 142,000 11667 Vieta Ave 843 211 1/28/02: 127,000 3248 Burton Ave 843 3/1 1/28/02: 127,000 2633 110 St 1,045 3/1 3/23/01 140,000 11034 Virginia Ave 1,176 3/2 2/7/01 142,000 11121 Linden St 1,604 3/1 9/29/00: 145,000 10120 San Jose 810 2/1 9/18/00 142,000 9/25/02: 170,000 4264 Agnes Ave 1,332 3/2 2/1/05. 335,000 1/19/04 265,000 3534 A nes St 1,257 2/1 1/18/01 10,000 Appendix Dii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table D -1 Sales Price Trends' Appendix A -iii Square Number Sales 2000 Listing Address Feet Bed /Bath History 2/26/02: 170,000 4054 Cortland St 973 2/1 9/4/01 113,100 1/2/04 180,000 3405 Elizabeth Ave 984 211 7/31/95. 140,000 11/30/00: 155,000 11497 S pruce St 798 211 5/28/93: 132,000 3259 Magnolia Ave 1,450 211 75 N/A 11616 Olive St 1,326 3/1 N/A 12/19/05. 455,000 3210 Euclid Ave 1,518 4/2 12/23/04 370,000 4157 Carlin Ave 1,032 3/1 N/A 2718 Norton Ave 1 3/1.5 N/A 10/30/00 151,000 4/20/00: 110,000 5228 Alvada 1,039 3/1 10/29/99 103,500 3358 Beechwood 1,344 3/1 11/21/00: 155,000 12609 Harris Ave 1,368 3/1 75 1/29/01 164,000 9/1/05. 400,000 8/8/03: 230,000 10995 Col er Ave 911 2/1 6/29/01 155,000 1122102: 476,000 3915 Louise St 1,099 2/2 2/2/01 147,000 7/11/01 168,000 1/8/01 174,136 3533 Burton Ave 1,488 4/2 10/3/00: 174,133 8/2/01 215,000 1/16/01 150,000 3294 Tena a Ave 1,719 4/2 6/13/00: 168,000 7/22/04. 345,000 4517 Abbott Rd 1,088 2/1 10/23/00 165,000 11432 Pear St 1,520 3/1 7/12/01 155,000 11254 Cornish Ave 1,062 3/2 10/3/00: 164,000 7/23/04. 355,000 10741 San Miguel Ave 1,072 3/1.5 12/18/00 166,000 4/18/01 135,000 11250 Pine Ave 838 2/1 9/18/00: 165,475 12044 Peach St 1,670 3/1 75 N/A 1/16/04 247 3200 Euclid 1,616 3/2 9/28/00 161,500 3289 Seminole Ave 1,260 3/1 12/21/01 177,000 10679 Kauffman Ave 1,279 2/1 9/16/02: 213,000 11/23/04 365,000 3121 Oakwood Ave 1,456 4/2 12/11/02: 237,000 11/17/00: 170,000 12115 Thorson Ave 1,463 3/2 4/2/00: 125,000 4/5/02: 163,000 120172 "Ave 1,377 211 7/11/00:112,500 Appendix A -iii CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Table D -1 Sales Price Trends' 2000 Listing Address Square Feet Number Bed /Bath Sales Histor 9/30/99 128,111 4341 Los Flores 1,517 2/2 3/18/05. 405,000 2/15/01 177,000 2/12/98: 150,000 11540 Pope Ave 1,320 3/1.5 N/A 11608 Lugo Park Ave 1,645 3/1 75 10/5/04 350,000 4/29/02: 200,000 11/06/00 165,000 11252 Louise Ave 1,895 3/1.25 6/6/01 193,000 3544 Jose hine 1,287 3/2 10/16/00:167,000 3830 Lilita St 1,310 4/1.5 10/16/00 173,000 10884 San Miguel Ave 1,004 3/1 1/19/01 168,000 10922 Col er Ave 1,116 3/2 10/27/00: 160,000 3687 Agnes Ave 1,884 3/2 10/13/00: 170,000 4801 Abbott Rd 1,530 3/1 1/17/02: 179,500 4025 Woodlawn Ave 1,767 5/2 12/22/00 189,000 6/1/00: 159,435 5241 Walnut Ave 1,352 4/2 N/A 4209 Platt Ave 1,593 3/2 8/31/00: 165,000 10830 Sampson 1,493 3/2 9/29/05. 449,000 9/21/00: 176,000 11911 Nevada Ave 1,308 3/1 7/1/02: 183,000 10/04/96. 146,500 10991 Elm Ave 1,678 3/2 9/24/03: 290,000 9/21/00: 187,000 3166 Lynwood Rd 1,771 4/2 2/14/03: 215,000 11609 Vieta Ave 1,816 3/2 N/A 121222" Ave 1,768 3/2 11/1/00184,000 11080 Elm St 1,398 2/1 4/30/01 155,000 11152 Elm St 2,467 4/2 11/6/00: 192,000 4/21/00: 165,998 12647 Antigua Ct 1,737 4/2.5 4/3/02: 194,000 11356 Virginia Ave 2,797 6/3 12/1/03: 315,000 4/10/03: 250,500 3/22/00: 220,000 11254 Linden 4,140 3/2 9/28/00: 264,000 Notes: ' Based on available county sales data Appendix Div CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX D SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC OUTREACH ACTIVITIES This Appendix provides a review of Public Outreach activities occurring occurred as part of the 1998 -2005 Housing Element Page D -1 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT This page intentionally left blank. Page 1 -2 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT City of Lynwood Housing Element Community Workshop July 2, 2007 Post It Notes Summary Challenges _ _ ______ ___ ___ ____ __ __ __ _ _ __ - _____- • Community Involvement • To get communitV involved in changes. • Simultaneous translation to encourage community participation. .. Rotfor niihlir nnfina fnr mootinnc — rarlin Innal TV flvarc • Implementation o How do we ensure certification of our housing element • The State itself has issued warning regarding housing near freeways. How does that affect units near the 105? • More senior housing. • To have shelters for emergencies. In case of an emergency where do you go? • Let people who don't know about special pick -up "not in the alley ". • HCD made [sic] comments to protect & produce rental housing. Need programs to incentivize rental housing. Formatted Formatted Formatted Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Page 1 -3 plan? • No individual assessment of sites provided. • Enforcing the 15% ordinance. • We need plant for new owners. • Single family homes. • Rent control. • Are you going to use empty lots only? • Senior apartments — low income for them. • Where are you going to put them? • We are over crowded now. • What about the two houses on Ferwood? • Affordable Housing • Affordable RENTAL housing is needed for low- income individuals. • Homeownership opportunities for low- income individuals. • Low Income family housing. • Affordable housing. • Need for larger units that are affordable for larger families. • We need more housing plans regarding low- income housing. • No extremely low- income category provided in Housing Element. • Post -Its - not placed in a category • The State itself has issued warning regarding housing near freeways. How does that affect units near the 105? • More senior housing. • To have shelters for emergencies. In case of an emergency where do you go? • Let people who don't know about special pick -up "not in the alley ". • HCD made [sic] comments to protect & produce rental housing. Need programs to incentivize rental housing. Formatted Formatted Formatted Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Page 1 -3 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT • Other notes — on flipchart paper /vs post -it note o Overcrowded issue — density too high — to many people • Loss of units with redevelopment • Parking • Rent, available • How to accommodate housing fsicl replacement Opportunities _ - Forma ed • Uniform relocation benefits to persons displaced by code - - --- Forma ed: enforcement conversions or demolitions. B fillets • Please analyze existing individualized site capacity (not lust and Numberi g vacant lots). • Just cause eviction ordinance. • State approved affordable housing bond. • We need night security for pangs. • If infill development is primary method to get affordable units (at 30 du /acre) put land restrictions on those sites to ensure the units are actually affordable. • Community center and sheriff center at Ham Park. • Involve non - profits who specialize in affordable housing issues in discussion of how to create more opportunities for building affordable housing. • Partnering with non - profits for special needs housing. • Positive and educational outreach to the community and consideration of demographics. (Spanish speakers) • Involve individuals and representative groups who are stakeholders in special needs allocations (like single- female head of household low- income. disabled). • To show people how city officials work for their community. • Transit oriented housing. • We need an emergency system for earthquakes and floods. • Fee on new developments for safety — creating safer communities to attract more businesses. Special fee on new community development for parks & green space. • Community involvement in creation of affordable housing at new development sites (i.e. resident involvement with developers with full voting rights) • Coordinate affordable housing with transportation. • To be able to buy a home in the city of Lynwood. • Restrict affordable housing units by deed and /or regulatory agreements. • To help to develop a program to have more opportunities to buy a house. • Rent control. Will bring more iob opportunities for Lynwood. Community oversight of new affordable housing developments /creation of "land use board" with community members to maintain resident input. • Other notes — on flipchart paper /vs post -it note o Website to afford opportunities to public. Page 1 -4 CITY OF LYNWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT Resources • All the group needs to be together to develop programs to have a fsicl surource like work together like a community. • State bond $ for housing & transportation. County grants for elimination — lead paint use — some time to outreach community inf. Would love to have housing element available online. • Require one to one replacement of demolished affordable rental units. • Inform non - profits of CDBG funding available. • More outreach to affordable housing developers. • Groups of volunteers can help handing out invitations door to door to attend meetings. • Need program to preserve exiting rental housing (put a fee or a limit on condo conversions). • This information regarding today's agenda needs to be reviewed 1 s 'to have fsicl comments. tnth,r nnf ovtanrl mivarl — inrnme tincluGionary 7nninnl to antira rity • Include funding availability in housing element so that private developers see what opportunity there is (as well as identifying sites available). • Develop community oversight boards to ensure representation of funds. • Need rent control to preserve housing for existing residents. • Other notes — on flipchart paper /vs post -it note • Block watch, monthly meetings, flyers (inform public). • Info prior to meeting — Internet. • Not must web. • Library and other. • ' Diversity — language. • Need other fsicl ports opportunities — Spanish sic flanevrel, English. • Latino community those who live here — publicity. Formatted Formatted Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Page 1 -5 City of Lynwood HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 City of Lynwood SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO HCD'S COMMENTS ON THE HOUSING ELEMENT DECEMBER 14, 2001 REVIEW LETTER The following summarizes modifications that are recommended to be included in the City of Lynwood's Housing Element based on the California Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD) comments dated December 14, 2001 and subsequent discussion with HCD staff in Fall and Winter of 2006/207 For your convenience, we've provided a summary of Lynwood's responses to HCD comments below HCD COMMENTS ON REVIEW AND REVISION OF THE PREVIOUS HOUSING ELEMENT i?�.u`u`7x HCD COMMENT IP!1 : CIT1f OF,LYNIIUO.OD;,FiESPON$E�,:,: � s A. Housing Programs 1. Identify adequate sites which will be made available... in accordance with subdivision f of Section 65589.5 a. Programs should be revised to provide Pursuant to comments received and in specific information that demostrates the accordance with the requirements of AB adequacy of sites to accommodate the 2348 codifed subsequent to this Draft of City's share of the regional housing need, the Housing Element, Appendix A.. including_ the agency responsible and Adequate Sites Analysis, has been timeline for implementation incorporated into the. Housing Element. Specifically, an inventory of vacant sites by zoning classification is provided, a listing of units built during the planning period and an evaluation of development potential in the newly adopted Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan. Additionally, a listing of projects "in the pipeline" to demonstrate market interest for infill development is provided. City of Lynwood A -1 HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 City of Lynwood HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 The element indicates that the majority of the City's need for low and moderate income housing will be met on sites recycled to higher intensity uses. As a result, the element should include programs to facilitate and promote infill, such as lot consolidation and density bonuses. Program b (page 6 of submittal) — should be revised to say specifically what the City will do to promote and facilitate the development of these sites, including any incentives the City will offer, and how developers will be informed of these opportunities. Program c. (page 6 of submittal) — should be revised to include information on the amount of land, housing capacity, and densities allowed for each site, as well as the development, and a completion date for the rezoning early in the planning period. If the rezoing is not accmplished early enough for development to occur within the planning period, the City will be required to amend the housing element to identify other sites that can accommodate development affordable to all income levels; Appendix A and Appendix B have been added to supplement the analysis of adequate sites. Appendix A provides a summary of units constructed and Appendix B provides a detailed review of adequate sites to meet low and moderate needs. Additionally, Chapter 5 provides additional policies to.meet this need including Goal 1, Policy a, Goal 1, Policy e; Goal 1, Policy f,• Goal 1, Goal 3; Policy e; Goal 3, Policy f,• Goal 3, Policy g,;Goal 3, Policy h, and Goal 3, Policy i As part of this revised Housing Element, a comprehensive revision to policies was conducted to clarity promoting infill sites. As Appendix A indicates, there are available sites to meet the need during the current period. To supplement this, language has been added to provide a listing of incentives. Specific references to these policies are provided in Goal 1, Policy e, Goal 1, Policy f,• Goal 3, Policy f,• Goal 3, Policy h, Goal 3, Policy i A comprehensive analysis of available sites has been included in Appendix A of the revised Housing Element. Subsequent to HCD's review of the previous.element, the City has implemented a number of rezoning and regulatory policies, including the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan, "by- right" second unit development, density bonus ordinance and inclusionary ordinance. Appendix A provides a discussion of these policies and includes a thorough review of avaialble sites. City of Lynwood HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 A -2 City of Lynwood HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 b The revision notes that emergency A more detailed discussion of emergency shelters and transition housing are allowed shelters and transitional housing is as a conditional use in commercial and provided in Chapter 4 of the revised industrial zones. However, the element Housing Element. Additionally, Goal 1, should also demonstrate how the Policy d provides specific policy actions to conditional use permit encourages and evaluate any impact on CUP processing facilitates the development of emergency for these types of facilities. shelters when proposals are received by Table 4 -4 of Chapter 4 provides a the Cit summary of the review requirements by 2. The'housing element shall contain programs, which "assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low and moderate income households (see section 65583c2). The element still needs to include a ,program to provide multifamily rental housing affordable to lower- and moderate - income households. While the revision includes information that supports this goal, it does not directly address the need for a specific program The program should describe any incentives that the City will offer, such as density bonuses or reducing or relaxing development standards how the programs will be funded, who is responsible for its implementation and when it will be Chapter 5 Goal 3, Policy l provides a more detailed policy for the provision of multiple housing for low and moderate income households. More specifically, the policy provides for a yearly review of existing policies and standards and provides for amendments to the zoning code, as appropriate. 3 The housing element shall contain programs that address, and where appropriate and legally possible, remove constraintss to the maintenance,, improvement, and development of housin section 65583c3 Revised program a (page 5), to remove Subsequent to the submittal of the the requirement for a conditional use Housing Element to HCD, the City has permit for multifamily housing in the R2 implemented Site Plan Review as a and R3 zones, should more specifically mechanism for single- family and multiple commit the city to implement this change family units in the the R -2 and R -3 Zone. and include an implementation date early Table 4 -4 of Chapter 4 provides a in the planning period to facilitate the summary of the review requirements by development of such units. If this zoning district. constraint is not removed early in the planning period, it is not clear the City will have sufficient sites available during the planning period to meet its share of the regional housing need by income City of Lynwood A -3 HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 City of Lynwood HCD Response Letter 1 03/01/07 046 MMENFN�R,',! 4 B. Other information ,,The information on households overpaying Chapter 3, Section A (1) (a) and Table 3-1 should specifically be incorportated into provide specific information on the housing needs analysis While the overpayment by Lynwood residents. - revision acknowledges the information, the City should ensure it is actually incorportated into the element before it is adopted. City of Lynwood I A-4 HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 City of Lynwood HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 City of Lynwood A -5 HCD Response Letter 03/01/07 AGENDA ITEM #9 CUP NO. 2007 -14 TTM NO. 2007 -08 (69283) VAR NO. 2007 -05 DATE: August 14, 2007 TO: Honorable Chair and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Karen Figueredo, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL PERMIT No 2007 -14, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2007 -03 (69283) & VARIANCE NO. 2007 -05 11339 -11341 Louise Avenue Assessor Parcel Number 6194 - 023 -043 APPLICANT: Alan Ream PROPOSAL This item was continued from Planning Commission meeting held July 10 12, 2007. The applicant is requesting approval to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums. The residences consist of six (6) buildings, two stories in height with attached one and two -car garages. The subject property is located at 11339 -11341 Louise Avenue, Assessor Parcel Number 6194 - 023 -043, in the R -3 (Multiple - Family Residential) zone. ANALYSIS & DISCUSSION The subject property totals 25,929 square feet in area and is located on the west side of Louise Avenue between Sanborn Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. The applicant must comply with current zoning standards. Each residence consisting of three or fewer bedrooms shall provide a two -car garage and residences consisting of four or more bedrooms shall provide a three car garage. Each enclosed parking stall shall provide 10'x 20' interior clear dimensions. The project is providing 26 enclosed parking spaces, consisting of ten (10) 1 -car garages, and two (2) 8 -car enclosed carports, or a total of sixteen (16) carport spaces. No open guest parking stalls are provided. The current code requirements require providing twenty-eight (28) enclosed parking stalls, plus 7 guests parking stalls, totaling 35 parking spaces. 1 The site plan indicates the property is rectangular in shape totaling 25,929 square feet with the driveway providing a minimum of twenty five feet (25') for the existing apartments. Floor plan identifies a total of six buildings with three buildings located at 11339 Louise Avenue with seven units and three buildings located at 11341 Louise Avenue another seven units. There are ten 2- bedroom units and four 3- bedroom units. The elevation identifies two -story structures with stucco siding and composition asphalt shingle roofs. The Lynwood Municipal Code allows a maximum density of one (1) unit per 2,420 square feet of property area. The property is sufficient in size to accommodate a maximum of ten (10) residential condominiums. The property is legal non - conforming per Conditional Use Permit 88093 resolution No. 2247. The proposal is consistent with provisions set forth in the State Subdivision Map Act and Lynwood Municipal Code Chapter 24, Subdivisions. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Development Services Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301(k). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the item to the next regular meeting September 11, 2007 pending Fire Department Approval and redesign of project. Attachments. 1. Project Profile 2. Location Map 3. Resolutions 3188, 3189 & 3190 4. Plans 2 PROJECT PROFILE Conditional Use Permit No 2007 -14 Tentative Tract Map No. 2007 -04 (69283) & Variance 2007 -05 11339 -11341 Louise Avenue (APN 6197 - 023 -043) 1 2. 3. :l Source and Authority Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) Section 25.20 sets forth development standards in residential zones and LMC Chapter 24 sets forth subdivision regulations. Property Location and Size The subject property totals 25,929 square feet in area. The project proposes to convert fourteen (14) existing apartments into residential condominiums. The residences consist of six (6) buildings, two- stories in height with attached garages. Existing Land Uses Site Developed North: Multi Family Residential South: Multi Family Residential West: Two Family Residential East: Multi Family Residential Land Use Designation The subject property has a General Plan Designation of Multi Family Residential and the current zoning is R -3 (Multi Family Residential)_. The adjoining properties General Plan and Zoning designations are as follows: Site General Plan North: Multi Family Residential South: Multi Family Residential West: Two Family Residential East: Multi Family Residential Zonina R -3 (Multi Family Residential) R -3 (Multi Family Residential) R -2 (Two Family Residential) R -3 (Multi Family Residential) 3 5. Site Plan Review The Site Plan Review Committee has reviewed the project denied and recommended to be continued to the next regular meeting September 11, 2007 pending Fire Department approval and redesign of project. 6. Code Enforcement History None at the time of this report. 7. Public Response None at the time of this report. rd 1 I I I I n LI I I' I 1 M1 rar ° til O 9 I I I I I I I I I I i ^^n' @ I I ' I I I I I I I I I N OJ A } Z a I z Z a E LOUISE � 'gym A u u I J JJ JJ ! !J A i if /a4°t � S ��'�.� n. ✓IEf �1- .. t!: !i�.J �l�II L I '. «r 11 `.S [�LF �J.. Q I ap?ip I I I I I CJ n i 0 la sls° 4 G .:i I;I ° z G.3I O 20 ° w` 1 \i O I < O 17I 1 16 `` d 052 r I 1 I t00�_ JJ I I I I SopP 0 I — I I I I I I i ^^n' @ I I ' I I I I I I I I I N OJ A } Z a I z Z a E LOUISE � 'gym A u u I J JJ JJ ! !J A i if /a4°t � �� T3 } }O N N lep Q Q I ap?ip I I I I I a ©1 ® ®i® i i 0 0_ O ® ® p p a b J 20 ° w` 1 191 I IIB 1 17I 1 16 `` a b 0 I I I I I I L 0 ^ 1 15 J I I I BLK, JJ JJ s sJ I sJ B o O I I B B s s I 3 n "'n j j J5 i„ 1 1-� � �O0 O O ® O O p p p p I 1 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 7 7 a a 9 9 1 10 m ( D © © i i I I 4 $ DUNCAN CODE 6063 Case No. `'UP 2007 -14, TTM 2007 -03 & VAR 2007 -05 Site Address. 11339 -11341 LOUISE AVENUE Applicant Name: Alan Ream [ 300' or [ ] 500' Radms Map = mrl Js n 6 as rJl 54 y 050 n LJ I al' 0 49 ~ M ® I h � �O' ; - rs T - - s J j 0 G - I I - .• .. U ¢ o 47 q rT L 7 Z Y K W J Z Q CO RESOLUTION 3188 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2007 -14, TO CONVERT FOURTEEN (14) EXISTING APARTMENTS INTO RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11339- 11341 LOUISE AVENUE, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6194 - 023 -043 THE R -3 (MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on July 10, 2007 conducted a public hearing and continued the item; WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on August 14, 2007 conducted a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Department has determined that the proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to section 15301(k), therefore; Section 1. The Lynwood Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. That the proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan Designation for the subject property is Multiple Family Residential that is consistent with the R -3 zoning designation. The project is consistent with the General Plan policies and goals in the Land Use and Housing Elements. B. That the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building, or structures; The project would be consistent with the R -3 zone pertaining to density However, the proposed condominium conversion does not satisfy minimum parking developments standards. C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use and buildings proposed. The site is not appropriate in size to accommodate the proposed fourteen (14) units, current code. allows a maximum of ten (10) units and does not meet the minimum parking development standards required for the R -3 zone specifications. Residences with four or more bedrooms require a three -car garage and residences with three or fewer bedrooms require a three -car garage. In addition, one guest stall is required for every two residences. D. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zoning district; and The property requires a total of twenty eight (28) enclosed parking and seven (7) guest parking stalls. The property provides twenty six (26) enclosed parking and zero (0) guest parking stalls thereby requiring approval of a major variance. Staff does not support a parking variance. E. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this Zoning Code. The project needs to comply with the minimum parking development standards. Section 2. The Lynwood Planning Commission hereby denies Conditional Use Permit 2007 -14 DENIED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2007, by members of the Planning Commission, voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 2 Lourdes Castro Ramirez, Chair Lynwood Planning Commission APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jonathan Colin, Manager Ron Wilson, Agency Counsel Development Services Department Planning Commission Counsel 3 RESOLUTION 3189 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT - - MAP NO. 2007 - 04(69283), TO CONVERT FOURTEEN (14) EXISTING APARTMENTS INTO RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS ON PROPERTY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11339 -11341 LOUISE AVENUE IN THE R -3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6194- 023 -043 CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on July 10, 2007 conducted a public hearing and continued the item; WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on August 14, 2007 conducted a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Department has determined that the proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301(k), therefore Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The Tentative Tract Map sastisfies all the applicable requirements and conditions by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of Lynwood Municipal Code Chapter 25 and Section 25 -180. B. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the applicable goals and policies of the Lynwood General Plan Land Use and Housing Elements. C. Proper and reasonable provisions are available for adequate ingress and egress to the parcels. However, the proposed condominium conversion does not satisfy minimum development standards. D. Proper and adequate provisions are available for all public utilities and public services. E. The project is not consistent with the intention and standards set forth in LMC Section 25.65 as inadecuate parking is provide on site. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the findings. identified above, hereby denies Tentative Tract Map No. 2007 -03 (69283). ADOPTED and DENIED this 14 day of August, 2007, by members of the Lynwood Planning Commission, voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT. Jonathan Colin, Manager Development Services Department Lourdes Castro - Ramirez, Chair Lynwood Planning Commission APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ron Wilson, Agency Counsel Planning Commission Counsel 2 RESOLUTION 3190 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2007 -05, REDUCING PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONVERSION OF FOURTEEN (14) EXISTING APARTMENTS INTO CONDOMINIUMS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11339- 11341 LOUISE AVENUE IN THE R -3 (MUTLIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, FURHTER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 6194 - 023 -043, CITY OF, LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on July 10, 2007 conducted a public hearing and continued the item; WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on August 14, 2007 conducted a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the pulbic hearing; and WHEREAS, the Development Services Department has Lynwood Planning Commission considered all oral and written testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Development Service Department has determined that the proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions set forth in the California Envorionmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guideliness pursuant to Section 15301 (k); therefore Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The project does not provide minimum parking as set forth in Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25 65 060 pertaining to residential tenant and guest parking as thirty five (35) stalls are required and twenty six (26) are proposed. Total parking deficiency is nine (9); two enclosed parking and seven (7) guest stalls. B. The project does not provide ADA access to a minimum of one (1) residence pursuant to the California Building Code. C. Granting the variance will not will not be consistent with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code, however, the proposed condominium conversion does not satisfy minimum development standards. D Approval of the variance grants privileges that are not possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone. E. The Variance is not consistent with the General Plan of the City of Lynwood . F. Granting the variance may be detrimental to the pulbic welfare and injurious to properties and iprovements in the vicinity. G. The project cannot satisfy the five (5) findings required for the Planning Commission to approve a Conditional Use Permit as set forth in Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25 130.050. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby denies Variance No. 2007 -05. ADOPTED and DENIED this 14 day of August, 2007 by members of the Lynwood Planning Commission, voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Jonathan Colin, Manager Development Services Department Lourdes Castro - Ramirez, Chair Lynwood Planning Commission APPROVED AS TO FORM. Ron Wilson, Agency Counsel Planning Commission Counsel 2