Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
20121017 - Agenda Packet - Board of Directors (BOD) - 12-34
IL IL Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Meeting, 12-34 SPECIAL MEETING HOARD OF DIRECTORS MIDPENINSLTLA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Historic Del Monte Building 100 South Murphy Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94086 Wednesday, October 1.7, 2012 SPECIAL MLFTING OF TILF. MIDPENINSIILA REGIONAL.,OPEN SPACE DISTRICT BEGINS AT 6:00 P.M.* AGENDA 6:00 SPECIAL,MEETING OF TIIE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TIIE NIII)PEN INS I!LA REGIONAL,OPENS PA(T DIST'R1CT— CLOSED SESSION ROLL.CALL, 1. CLOSED SESSION: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —ANTIC IPATED LITIGATION Significant e XpoSure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: One Potential Case AD.IOLIRNMENT OE CLOSED SESSION :VIEET'INC 7:00 ROLL CALL I. ¢Oorroval of Remainin-,Project Elements of the Mount (JInunhum Environmental Restoration_and Public Access Project, Includinii-Y_Selection of a_Radar'Bower Option and \pj)roval of Sumn1it_Area Amenities, as an _amendment to the I Ise and Management Plan for Sierra Azul Oren Sr.)ace Preserve- M. Manning 9:00 ADJOURN * Times are estimated and items may appear earlier or later than listed. Agenda is subject to change of order. TOADDRFS.S THE BOARD: The President will invite public comment on agenda items at the thne each item is considered by the Board of Directors. You may address the Board concerning other matters during Oral Cormnunication.s. Each speaker will ordinarily be limited to three minutes.Alternately,you may comment to the Board by a written communication, which the Board appreciates. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.if you iced assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the District Clerk at(650)691-11_00. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the District to make reasonable,arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Written materials relating to an item on this Agenda that are considered to be a public record and are distributed to Board members less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.will be available tar public inspection at the Districts Administrative Office located at 330 Distel Circle,Los Altos.Califirrma 94022. 1 POSTIING OF AGENDA L Michelle Radcliffe.District Clerk for the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District(MROSD).declare that the foregoing amended agenda for the Special Meeting of the MROSD Board of i)irectors was posted and available for review on October 12,2012_at the Administrative Offices of MROSD,330 Distel Circle. Los Altos California,94022. The agenda is also available on the District's web site at http://www.openspace.org. Signed this 12"day of October.at Los Altos.California. ji: e � rx District Clerk October 12.2012 �� r 1 � ,� � ,� .� +►,f.r.,�, b� � � F :. , � t„t * ,, ., c � � ... �.,�. .., �__ . , .��� •:, ,,s_ ,, .:.,,__ � x �+4' 2;.�_ �.€���r ,.�.,c �,a, _ t� 'r-<z �i; r � q" i��. � ?Ac� :_:.5 T t: ��. , � s ,; . ,.:. t• .,... �.�. . `� �;, •k• :[ '�* .� e;`._T �,��� ti'� :� ,; #' "�r.''„ fi;- .. HJ 1,• L �'�� ,��;.' .. 4. q ff�; F,,': , ,r a,�,, �{, +. r`".. �,j r` ��� .� �� �`� ., �, T � � 9�t �� J' �• x r P° t pJ r I ( 11 it b tr };�slfli ON M ,� fR f ^Y L f4 r �T 1 y i .�R J ,��• y # . � . , �= \`� ` / �\�« � » � . � k\ . \Z�. .®�� � ���� � //� <�®\ , i 2,�� � w,y 4 . � \/�. � ���� `% �� ' ^ � ��} } �, < ��. . �� . \ j< \ ��^ � � % �\ � : m, . .® � � �� . � J� \ °�\, � .� � .\� . } ~ � % \/>� \ \ ag��±� �\: � my� » \:� . ©` � : &yz ® . � '� . , �af�/� ? � y� ` >\ . >22\ . : �$/ < . � \ . � � % « » � ,� � �""e. v _ _ b �, A �' .� ��►. �_ ♦�► �, �' � � �" .,,, , .�._" '. 4 Ii 1 � w ;Yf A t r 6 ' 7 i Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Public Comments Received October 12 through October 17,2012 I'I 1. ----Original Message---- Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:31 PM To: MROSD - Mt. Urn Subject: preserve the Mt. Um Tower Meredith Manning, Senior Planner MidPeninsula Regional Open Space District via email: mt.urn.tower(&openspace.or Dear Ms. Manning, I hope to be able to attend the public meeting this week concerning the fate of the radar tower atopMt. Umunhum. However, if this meeting is like previous ones I might only et a minute or g p g Yg two to express my opinions. Not wishing to be rushed, I'll write an email instead: please share copies with the MidPen Board of Directors and the Staff of your Planning Department. An article b Scott Herhold in the Sept. 25 2012 San Jose Mercury News describes an excellent i Y � rY idea by Sam Drake to save the Mount Umunhum tower: if MidPen does not have the charter to preserve historic structures, transfer the tower(and a little nearby land) to County Parks. Speaking for myself(I haven't checked with the Director of the Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department), I feel that the idea has merit. i I served on the Santa Clara County Parks and Rec. Commission about a decade ago. While there were challenges, the Parks Department has shown that it is able to preserve, maintain, and operate historic structures: examples include Villa Montalvo, Casa Grande at Almaden Quicksilver, and the Grant Ranch homestead. Also, there is precedence for inter-agency land transfers: a few years ago, County Parks leased Rancho San Antonio Co. Park to MidPen so as to avoid complications from the County Parks' policies on parking lot fees. I have not seen the Mt. Um. radar tower up close: I'll take your word that it is not of outstanding architectural design nor in great condition. However, even if the structure needs to be braced, boarded up, and sealed, it would still serve as a landmark to all of Silicon Valley. And I can hope that someone (County Parks?) someday could provide for public access to the roof-top (perhaps by elevators and stairs on the south-side outside wall): the views from the roof would be fantastic, even if/when trees grow back on the surrounding lands. The roof would provide a great place for a visitors' center, with placards of historic interest and perhaps a rooftop cafe. When thinking about the Mt. Um. radar tower, I am reminded of Alcatraz Island in the SF Bay. While it is true that the island would be prettier and more natural without those ugly buildings on it, if they had been removed, Alcatraz would simply be another green island in the bay rather than an international tourist destination and a reminder of a colorful and sobering history. Page 1 I I hope the Mount Um tower will be preserved, transferred to another agency if need be, and perhaps someday transformed with a rooftop observation deck and Visitor Center. Larry Ames, past County Parks & Rec. Commissioner 10/15/12 2. ----Original Message---- From: Jordan Makower Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 7:56 PM To: Scott Herhold; MROSD - Mt. Um; Basim Jaber Subject: Regarding the Mt. Um Tower I don't know if I will be able to make the meeting in Sunnyvale by 7 PM; I would appreciate it if someone would read my letter in the public comment portion. I will try my best to be there, but I know that I will arrive late, and not be able to fill out the comment card at the start of the session this Wednesday, October 17. Thank you. 3. ----Original Message---- From: George Clifford Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 5:36 PM To: General Information; MROSD - Mt. Um Subject: Mt. Umunhum Godbe Research Survey Members of the Board: I have read over the results of the survey that you commissioned to study the fate of the top of Mt. Umunhum. While I support the conclusion that the site should be cleaned up and opened to the public, I dispute one of Godbe's Key Conclusions: "Keeping the Tower is the most popular among the three Tower options, when initially asked side-by-side, and in an `agree-disagree'format." Of the MROSD residents after disclosing the costs, only 27.5%favor"retain, stabilize, and seal" the tower. However, 57.4% favor complete or partial removal of the tower. Clearly, the majority favors some removal of the tower, not "keeping the tower" as the survey key conclusions misleadingly state. I urge the board to follow the results of the survey by either completely or partially removing the tower. George Clifford Los Altos Hills Page 2 i 4. ----Original Message---- Date: October 11, 2012, 4:24:40 PM PDT To: <web(t4)openspace.org> Subject: Re: Um All: Survey Shows Overwhelming Support for Mount Umunhum Clean- Up; Public Access And the rest of California supports keeping in9 the radar tower. Allan M cLar n S. ----Original Message---- From: Sam Drake Sent: Friday, October 12 2012 11:52 PM MR To: D - Mt. Urn m Subject: Comments on the new Options A and B My opinion, for whatever it's worth ... A and B are flawed as written...but A is easy to fix and support with the fixes. Full text is here: http://sammydee.net/blog%uncate.gorizedlumunhum-endgame See you Wednesday night! ...Sam On Wednesday night the Board of the Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District will decide the fate of the Cube on Mt. Unnunhum. In previous discussions about the Cube on Mt. Umunhum, three options have been discussed: 1. Remove the Cube entirely 2. Remove all but the base of the Cube. or 3. Keep the Cube intact and seal the entire structure I and most public respondents have argued strongly in favor of Option 3...preserving the Cube. Today Mid-Pen posted the"board packet" for the October 17 meeting. (Warning, it's a long document.)The document describes the decisions that are on the agenda for the meeting, provides the Board and public with detailed information about various options and.the General Manager's recommendations to the Board. In addition to the three options that have been considered before, this document now describes two additional options for the Board to consider: • Interim Action A: Near-term repair and securing of structure while seeking external partnerships, and Interim Action B: Near-term fence around structure while seeking external partnerships Page 3 Both options A and B would "provide time (approximately 5 years) for proponents of the tower to seek partnerships, outside funding, and other additional resources to allow for implementation of Option 1" Option A would make necessary repairs which would allow the public to come near the Cube, including, sealing all external openings, replacing stairs and guardrails, and fixing cracks in the C� structure ... but only on the first floor. Cost: S414,000. Option B would simply put a temporary fence around the Cube to keep everyone away. Cost: S74,000. 1, for one, welcome these new options as an attempt at finding a compromise over the issue. However, I think both options are somewhat flawed. First, let's dismiss"Interim Action B". It's not worthy of consideration, either by those who want to save the Cube or by the Board. If the Board simply throws a fence around the Cube ... without doing repairs ... the optics are horrible for the Board. Public sentiment won't be-oh, it's wonderful that the Board is trying to save the Cube" ... rather, it will be "they are hoping the roof falls in and does their job for them". It doesn't make anyone any happier, doesn't take any pressure oll'the Board ... and thus is both a political failure as well as an ugly sad mess. Interim Action A contains a grain of a good idea, but as written is quite flawed. But I think it can be salvaged, and turned into something that I for one would heartily support. What's good about Option A? It buys time. It lets work to open the summit to visitors continue unimpeded. Most importantly, it causes those of us who say we want to save the Cube to-put up or shut up". If we think the money to save the Cube is easy to find ... we need to -et off our butts and help find it. 1, for one, welcome that challenge ... and will personally donate money and time to that effort. What's wrong with Option A? First, proposal A - like B doesn't include any work to stabilize the Cube itself. It includes work to make sure people can walk up to the Cube without having something fall on them ... but doesn't include work to prevent the Cube itself from deteriorating over the next 5 years. Those who love the Cube will still worry that Mid-Pen is just trying to stall, hoping that the Cube will fall down or be so damaged by weather or time that there's no option but to tear it down. Second, the language ot"proposal A-also like B - is one-sided and antw4onistic. It says, quote, '*this is a new interim action to provide time (approximately 5 years) for proponents of the tower to seek partnerships, outside funding, and other additional resources to allow for implementation of Optioti No where does it say that Mid-Pen will help. No where does it say that Mid-Pen 't Bind er der that effort. No where does it say Mid-Pen WANTS to keep the Cube. It simply says "OK, the clock is ticking ... you activists better get busy". In short, it doesn't cause Mid-Pen to buy in. By doing that it continues the cynical belief that Mid-Pen wants the effort to fall, and still wants to knock down the Cube. If that's what they want,they can hinder the effort in numerous passive-aggressive ways. Want to give money to the Page 4 ' effort, but want to meet the Mid-Pen staff first' Sorry, they're out u[town. Want to visit the site? Sorry, nobody ivavailable. Want to see plans? Sorry, can't fiodthern today. Wotit to donate money, but only i[Lbe Mid-Pen obuffuod board are invcstediu seeing' the Cube preserved? Crickets. 1-low could Option A be made viable? Easy. |, The Mid-Pen Board needs im pass u resolution stating that they WANII1hcfund-raising eObz1 tobe successful, and the tower tobesaved. Whether i\ will bc successful or not nobody can tell ... but they need topublicu|ly say that they hope itis. 2. The Mid-Pen General Manager needs<o say, oo the record, that be WANTS the fund-raising ef6ort to be successful, and the tower to be saved. Ifthe pro-Cube activist public still worries that ` Steve Abborn is working against them, not u true partner, this isn't going to vvodc. f{e needs io unambiguously buy in to wanting to save the Cube, not just kicking the can down the road a bit more. 3. Option Aneeds to include not just satety repairs, but also any other repairs urgently needed in the next 5 years (u prevent further dmrnugetmthe Cube i1oc|� That makes it clear that this isn't simply ustalling tactic. Those ofuaio South San Jose remember the debacle ofDBMBuilding 026 all too well. With two small changes to the |ou,,uage ... and ul5minute press conference ... l think Option A provides u [aoiomiiu cod to wbu1 could have easily been.a very ugly situation. � gives us the option to preserve the Cube ... and makes Mid-Pen a partner in that eff'ort. The fate ofthe Cube will tru|vheio our hands. —oaoz G. --0rigina| &8essage-- Sent: Monday, October 1S, 2O123:36PM To: Subject: Mt Umunhum project - Please tear down the tower &restore the natural environment Dear Open Space District, K8y wife and | are frequent visitors tn the Mt. Umunhum area. |would like to register my^vote"for restoration of Mt. Umunhum to a natural setting. (|would not have objection to a small shack or similar-for historical commemoration of its Cold War history and those who served.) I find the tower itself to be quite ugly, and a real eyesore. It's historical significance is dwarfed by its disruption of the natural environment,soit deserves tobe torn down. Thank you. Herbert Litvak San Jose,CA951JO Page . . .. ............__ 7. ----Original Message---- Sent:Sunday,October 14,2012 6:39 PM To: BOARD;Clerk;Vicky Gou; General Information Subject: 10/14/2012-Contact Board First Name: Julie Last Name: Tardos Ward /Location: San Jose Comments: Until I learned of the Save the Cube movement, I had no idea what that ugly box was up on the mountain. I don't see any reason to keep it up. Tearing down the Cube will improve the scenery, imho. Thanks for reading, Julie Tardos Page 6 County ®f Santa Clara Historical heritage Commission County Government Center,East Wing 70 West liedding St,7th floor San Jose,California 951.10-1705 m--- (-08)299-6714 October 9, 2012a Board of Directors Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 Subject: Preservation of the Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower Dear Board of Directors, The Santa Clara County Historic Heritage Commission (HHC) has received and reviewed requests from members of the public to consider the eligibility of Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower for historical landmark status and /or inclusion to Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory. On August 16, 2012, the HHC received a presentation from Mr. Basim Jaber, regarding the eligibility of Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower as a potential historic resource. At the meeting, the HHC voted to consider the request for eligibility and to review the possible options to include the Radar Tower in the County's Heritage Resource Inventory. On September 24, 2012, the HHC received a presentation from the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (Director Pete Siemens, Planning Manager Ana Ruiz, Senior Planner Meredith Manning, and a consultant from Page and Turnbull), regarding the Mt. Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access project. The Commission discussed the historic significance of the Radar Tower and County Ordinance provisions for possible inclusion to the Heritage Resource Inventory. The HNC voted unanimously to send a letter to the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, to preserve the Radar Tower on Mt. Umunhum and not to demolish, the Radar Tower, either in part or in whole. The County's Historical Heritage Commission has the responsibility "to protect, preserve and promote the historical and cultural heritage of this County so that future generations may know and appreciate the significant historical places, people and events that have been a part of this area of our state and nation." (Section A6.60- County Ordinance Cade). The Commission believes that Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower, as part of the former Almaden Air Force Station, is one of the few remaining resources of the County's association with the Cold War era. The early warning radar base that operated from 1958 to 1980 has been a visual and symbolic landmark for the residents of Santa Clara County for many years. The HHC reviewed the Historic Resource Study of Former Almaden Air Force Station (dated July 6, 2010) and the Addendum (dated July 20, 2011) prepared by Page and Turnbull, which concluded that the Radar Tower is not eligible to the California Register based on its lack of integrity due to "the removal of the radar sail and the interior mechanics that associate it with its former defense function," The HHC discussed recommending to the Board of Supervisors that the County consider pursuing an independent Historic Resource Evaluation of the Radar Tower and other potential significant resources, prior to issuance of demolition permit for the Radar Tower, by the Department of Planning and Development. The Commission hopes that the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District would consider the overwhelming-support of the public to preserve the Radar Tower and would like to strongly encourage MROSD and its Board of Directors to not consider demolition either in whole or in part, the only remaining remnant of the Former Almaden Air Force Station that may be a potential historic resource in Unincorporated Santa Clara County. The Commission appreciates and commends MROSD for the public outreach efforts with regards to the design options for the Radar Tower and encourages you to preserve the Radar Tower. Very truly yours, J6nnifer Ta , Chairperson Historical Heritage Commission CC: Board of Directors, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Lynn Regadanz, Interim Clerk of the Board Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission \N c' i To: Board of Directors Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District We, the undersigned, respectfully petition the Board of Directors of the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District to preserve, maintain the integrity of, and keep intact the 5-story Mt. Umunhum search radar tower in perpetuity. Basim S.Jaber San Jose, CA Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Basim Jaber United States 6/12/2012 Jordan Makower Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 6/12/2012 Paul McWilliams San Jose California 95138 United States 6/12/2012 Bill Foley Brighton Massachusetts 2135 United States 6/12/2012 L McGowan Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 6/12/2012 William Foley United States 6/12/2012 Mark Hurley San Jose California 95138 United States 6/12/2012 Tony Fischer San Jose California 95136 United States 6/12/2012 grace Seegmiller Caldwell Idaho 83605 United States 6/12/2012 Marianne Mueller Palo Alto California 94301 United States 6/13/2012 Scott Blalock Hesperia California 92345 United States 6/13/2012 lack Sheehan Harwinton Connecticut 6791 United States 6/13/2012 Bill Conway Billings Montana 59102 United States 6/13/2012 James Kerbey San Jose California 95125 United States 6/13/2012 James Siscel Lynnwood Washington 98036 United States 6/13/2012 Gregory Call United States 6/13/2012 Ron Dootson United States 6/13/2012 coleen clark san jose California 95125 United States 6/13/2012 Bryce Reynolds San Jose California 95118 United States 6/13/2012 eiden babaoghli San Jose California 95120 United States 6/13/2012 Donald Gates San lose California 95123 United States 6/13/2012 Darlene White Fairfield California 94534 United States 6/13/2012 Martin Nielsen Albuquerque New Mexico 87123 United States 6/13/2012 Dwight Penfield South Glastonbury Connecticut 6073 United States 6/13/2012 Jim Ault MESA Arizona 85205 United States 6/13/2012 Tom Spargo San Jose California 95118 United States 6/13/2012 George Royer Los Gatos California 95032-3572 United States 6/13/2012 Hugo Antonucci Adin California 96006 United States 6/13/2012 Tim Peters United States 6/13/2012 Debbie Dewey Medina Ohio 44256-8869 United States 6/13/2012 Chris Zervos United States 6/13/2012 Bob Watts Morgan Hill California 95038 United States 6/13/2012 Robert Ramento San Jose California 95123 United States 6/13/2012 David Garibay Fremont California 94536 United States 6/13/2012 Gail Klein Stanford California 94305 United States 6/13/2012 Wayne Jueal San Jose California 95130 United States 6/13/2012 delaine ralston grover beach California 93433 United States 6/13/2012 Cheryl Jueal San Jose California 95130 United States 6/13/2012 Reed Geisreiter Santa Cruz California 95062 United States 6/13/2012 Dan Mason San Jose California 95125 United States 6/13/2012 JANE EAGLE GRATON California 95444 United States 6/13/2012 mlise avedian United States 6/13/2012 Charles Jeronimo Livermore California 94550-4224 United States 6/13/2012 Jessica Mills los gatos California 95032 United States 6/13/2012 Bruce Mann Corning California 96021 United States 6/13/2012 David Lacasse Torrington Connecticut 6790 United States 6/13/2012 Penelope Cole Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/13/2012 Robert Zenorini Demarest New Jersey 7627 United States 6/13/2012 Lisa Penney Belmont California 94002 United States 6/13/2012 Kent Pillatsch Wentzville Missouri 63385 United States 6/13/2012 vern niewald Belmont California 94002 United States 6/13/2012 Tari Blalock Hesperia California 92345 United States 6/13/2012 Lloyd McBeth Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/13/2012 Bernie Chavarria Safford Arizona 85546 United States 6/13/2012 Lisa Hill Salinas California 93901 United States 6/13/2012 Al Carlson Capitola California 95010 United States 6/13/2012 Charles Glover Savannah Georgia 31406 United States 6/13/2012 Stephen Weatherly Wellesley Island New York 13640 United States 6/13/2012 Richard Welsh Sacramento California 95821 United States 6/13/2012 Bob McGowan Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 6/13/2012 Edward Hobbs TOLEDO Ohio 43615 United States 6/13/2012 Gary Coff land Sonoma California 95476 United States 6/13/2012 Dallas Gittins Fort Bragg California 95437 United States 6/13/2012 David Casteel Dallas Texas 75243 United States 6/13/2012 Tom Graham United States 6/13/2012 Douglas Brawner United States 6/13/2012 segifredo inguanzo newark California 94560 United States 6/13/2012 Jane Dredge United States 6/13/2012 Gary Johnson Liveermore California 94550 United States 6/13/2012 nancy shafhirt United States 6/13/2012 kitty Monahan San Jose California 95120 United States 6/13/2012 Charles Aftosmis East Falmouth Massachusetts 2536 United States 6/14/2012 John Pundsack Midwest City Oklahoma 73130 United States 6/14/2012 Terry Bush Los Altos California 94022 United States 6/14/2012 Ojigalak Kanaw Campbell California 95011 United States 6/14/2012 Gregory Stevens San Jose California 95124 United States 6/14/2012 Nannette Morgan United States 6/14/2012 Karen Busey Madeira Beach Florida 33708 United States 6/14/2012 Nicholas Byram San Jose California 95120 United States 6/14/2012 Mark Johnson San Jose California 95124 United States 6/14/2012 Dominique Acre United States 6/14/2012 william homer san jose California 95136 United States 6/14/2012 SSgt.Mark Arnett Albuquerque New Mexico 87120 United States 6/14/2012 Kenneth Wilson Panama City Florida 32405-3909 United States 6/14/2012 Brandi Sabin Bella Vista Arkansas 72714 United States 6/14/2012 Gary Schreck United States 6/14/2012 Lois Chestnutt Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 6/14/2012 Curtis Hoppins Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/14/2012 Marjory Zenorini Demarest New Jersey 7627 United States 6/14/2012 wiliam edwards Simi valley California 93063 United States 6/14/2012 Patrick Rivas San Jose California 95125 United States 6/14/2012 Carissa Hobbs San Jose California 95117 United States 6/14/2012 Simon Hobbs San Jose California 95117 United States 6/14/2012 Wendy Norwood San Francisco California 94115 United States 6/14/2012 Ginger Gilbert Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/14/2012 Marsha Brashear Sunnyvale California United States 6/14/2012 Wayne Britt Folsom California 95630 United States 6/14/2012 Ernest Hall Salinas California 93907 United States 6/14/2012 ARDYS SANDELL Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 6/14/2012 Mike Eckley San Jose California 95117 United States 6/14/2012 dickwhittington whittington big sur California 93920 United States 6/14/2012 Patricia Hannum Sunnyvale California 94097 United States 6/14/2012 Allen Tyson Hollister California 95023 United States 6/14/2012 William Scott San Jose California 95139 United States 6/14/2012 Doris Britschgi Campbell California 95008 United States 6/15/2012 Joey Huggins Euless Texas 76039 United States 6/15/2012 Linna Harnack Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 6/15/2012 Marcus Costello Belmont California 94002 United States 6/15/2012 Raymond Buda West Union Ohio 45693 United States 6/15/2012 Kelly Carlson Freedom California United States 6/15/2012 Jim Cirner Felton California 95018 United States 6/15/2012 Patricia Roth Campbell California 95008 United States 6/15/2012 Stephen James San Jose California 95120 United States 6/15/2012 Brianne McWilliams San Jose California 95138 United States 6/15/2012 Renee Zempel San Jose California 95120 United States 6/15/2012 Jane Schlager Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 6/15/2012 Thomas Lindberg Monterey California 93942-0085 United States 6/15/2012 Jonathan Olson San jose California 95118 United States 6/15/2012 Mark Meador San Jose California 95120 United States 6/15/2012 Steven Winslow San Jose California 95124 United States 6/15/2012 Rob Adams Campbell California 95008 United States 6/15/2012 Tobin Gilman San Jose California 95120 United States 6/15/2012 Gale Ashworth Folsom California 95630 United States 6/16/2012 Marie Canepa Carmel California 93923 United States 6/16/2012 Daniela Wersin San Jose California 95123 United States 6/16/2012 Heather Mendez Brentwood California 94513 United States 6/16/2012 Renee Emery San Francisco California 94133 United States 6/16/2012 Kaileigh Hobbs San Jose California 95117 United States 6/16/2012 Alexis Busalacchi San Jose California 95117 United States 6/16/2012 John Kullberg Loves Park Illinois 61111 United States 6/16/2012 Gary Falkenberg Jersey Village Texas 77040 United States 6/17/2012 Peggy White San Jose,CA 95121 California 95121 United States 6/17/2012 John Stiff Bend Oregon 97701 United States 6/17/2012 Margie Rogers San Lorenzo California 94580 United States 6/17/2012 Mary Martin San Jose California 95120 United States 6/17/2012 John Hawthorne Endicott New York 13760 United States 6/18/2012 Karla Nubling Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/18/2012 Maria Brand San Jose California 95135 United States 6/18/2012 Beth Wyman Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 6/18/2012 Connie Rogers Gilroy California 95020 United States 6/18/2012 Catherine McCleery San Jose California 95124 United States 6/18/2012 Julie Priest San Jose California 95124 United States 6/18/2012 Ed Jaworski North Prairie Wisconsin 53153 United States 6/18/2012 Judy Stabile San Jose California 95112 United Mates 6/18/2012 Diana Zappel Sanlose California 95112 United States 6/18/2012 George Morgan Parker Colorado 80234 United States 6/18/2012 joe baronessa San Jose California 95124 United States 6/18/2012 Diane McLaughlin Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/19/2012 Francis(Frank)Welsh Louisville Kentucky 40245 United States 6/19/2012 Steve Weiss North Las Vegas Nevada 89081 United States 6/19/2012 Stephen Hornung Reynoldsburg Ohio 43068 United States 6/19/2012 darci montmarquet del rio Texas 78840 United States 6/19/2012 Barry Thornbury Gurnee Illinois 60031 United States 6/19/2012 Christina Blalock San Jose California 95127 United States 6/19/2012 William Barclay Jr Sparks Nevada 89436 United States 6/19/2012 Judith Arbaugh Roseville California 95661 United States 6/19/2012 Angela Pappanastos Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/19/2012 jerome oriel Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/19/2012 Julie Perrucci Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/19/2012 Dan Theurer San Jose California 95124 United States 6/19/2012 Sia Pappanastos San Jose California 95124 United States 6/19/2012 Kim Davis San Jose California 95120 United States 6/19/2012 Lance Ginner Portola Valley California 94028 United States 6/19/2012 Brian Davis Everett Washington 98201 United States 6/19/2012 Joshua Bligh Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/19/2012 Cassedy Stien IV Nevada 89450 United States 6/20/2012 joyce priest Fort Worth Texas 76137 United States 6/20/2012 Bill Schubert San Jose California 95123 United States 6/20/2012 Susan Schubert San Jose California 95135 United States 6/20/2012 Catherine perrone San Jose California 95120 United States 6/20/2012 Jeff Perrone San Jose California 95120 United States 6/20/2012 Armando Barboza Brandon Florida 33510 United States 6/20/2012 cathy benito los gatos California 95032 United States 6/21/2012 Diana Dwyer Windsor California 95492 United States 6/21/2012 Dennis Feick Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 6/21/2012 Steven Howlett Cameron Park California 95682 United States 6/21/2012 Ralph Hunt Mountain View California 94040 United States 6/22/2012 Walter Underwood Palo Alto California 94306 United States 6/22/2012 Tim Penner Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 6/22/2012 Tony May San Jose California 95112 United States 6/22/2012 Leslie Benton Wilmette Illinois 60091 United States 6/22/2012 Keith Hawes San Jose California 95120 United States 6/22/2012 Keith Rauchle Trenton Missouri 64683 United States 6/22/2012 Diane Hawes San Jose California 95120 United States 6/22/2012 D Kisler Gilroy California 95020 United States 6/22/2012 Jonathan Carr Tracy California 95376 United States 6/22/2012 Chris Ohlsen Santa Cruz California 95065 United States 6/22/2012 Harry Pottol Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 6/22/2012 Robert Getsla San Jose California 95118 United States 6/23/2012 Scott Moog Seattle Washington 98146 United States 6/23/2012 Michael Canepa Carmel California 93923 United States 6/23/2012 edward yu san jose California 95128 United States 6/23/2012 Dan Simons Klamath California 95548 United States 6/23/2012 Cathy miller Salem Oregon 97302 United States 6/23/2012 1 Larry Tuttle Sunnyvale, California 94087 United States 6/23/2012 Jerry Hess Davis California 95616 United States 6/24/2012 joyce cornacchion SAN JOSE California 95125 United States 6/24/2012 Don Bankston Jr Arlington Texas 76002 United States 6/24/2012 Dan Cronin San Bruno California 94066 United States 6/24/2012 Peter Ward San Jose California 95123 United States 6/24/2012 kerry carlson Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 6/24/2012 Robert Miller Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/24/2012 Maureen Guajardo San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Victoria Freitas San Jose California 95130 United States 6/24/2012 Gail Ivancovich Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/24/2012 Robert Franklin Oakdale California 95361 United States 6/24/2012 Charlene McAulay San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Gene Clancy Santa Clara California 95050 United States 6/24/2012 james Finkle los gatos California 95032 United States 6/24/2012 Tim Sparks Saratoga California 95070 United States 6/24/2012 Joan Schuller San Jose California 95125 United States 6/24/2012 Damion Snowden San Jose California 95124 United States 6/24/2012 James Acker San Martin California 95046 United States 6/24/2012 SUE CONTRERAS SANTA CLARA California 95051 United States 6/24/2012 Christine Decker San Jose California 95124 United States 6/24/2012 Kent Miller Morgan Hill California 95020 United States 6/24/2012 Devonne Maclaren San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Neal Casteel San lose California 95124 United States 6/24/2012 john egan san jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Craig Bowers Los Gatos California 95033 United States 6/24/2012 Michael Jacobs San Jose California 95136 United States 6/24/2012 Edelina Jacobs San Jose California 95136 United States 6/24/2012 Anthony Bulygo Bakersfield California 93314 United States 6/24/2012 Sheila Norton San lose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Carl Myerholtz San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Connie Schein San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Geoff Alexander San Jose California 95112 United States 6/24/2012 Liisa Fong San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 kim bowers Los Gatos California 95033 United States 6/24/2012 James Sheehan San Jose California 95130 United States 6/24/2012 Catherine Hendrix San Jose California 95136 United States 6/24/2012 Andrea Rash San Jose California 95123 United States 6/24/2012 David Wooten Sheridan Wyoming 82801 United States 6/24/2012 Margaret Graves Cupertino California 95014 United States 6/24/2012 Sam Bowers Los Gatos California 95033 United States 6/24/2012 cole Bolinger los gatos California 95030 United States 6/24/2012 jacob warkov eugene Oregon 97401 United States 6/24/2012 Larry Carr San Martin California 95046 United States 6/24/2012 joel naatus Jersey City New Jersey 7306 United States 6/24/2012 Rudy Contreras Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/24/2012 Lillian Kaiser San Jose California 95154 United States 6/24/2012 Lynn Hunwick Palo Alto California 94301 United States 6/24/2012 Lorraine Parker Palo Alto California 94302 United States 6/24/2012 Joan Brodovsky San Jose California 95126 United States 6/24/2012 john seyfarth los altos California 94022 United States 6/24/2012 Ken Richardson San Jose California 95124-3119 United States 6/24/2012 Marvin Tanner San Jose California 95120 United States 6/24/2012 Bob Goedjen Saratoga California 95070 United States 6/24/2012 Julia Minser Los Gatos California 95030 United States 6/24/2012 Robert Frohock Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 6/24/2012 Tom Kearney San Jose California 95118 United States 6/24/2012 Bill Wendt Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 6/24/2012 Dianne Laverne Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 6/25/2012 christine mannos san jose California 95136 United States 6/25/2012 Charles Benjamin Campbell California 95008 United States 6/25/2012 Mary Campbell-Droze Redwood City California 94061 United States 6/25/2012 Anita Chang San Jose California 95131 United States 6/25/2012 Bruce Hadburg Safety Harbor Florida 34695 United States 6/25/2012 Walter Roth SAn Jose California 95121 United States 6/25/2012 Suzanne Werner Monte Sereno California 95030 United States 6/25/2012 John Cormode Mountain View California 94040 United States 6/25/2012 Amy Rasmussen Hughson California 95326 United States 6/25/2012 Pamela Rebillot San Jose California 95126 United States 6/25/2012 Carol Frost san Jose California 95126 United States 6/25/2012 Michael MacFaden San Jose California 95120-5420 United States 6/25/2012 Margaret Hylbert San Jose California 95124 United States 6/25/2012 Milt Peddy San lose California 95124 United States 6/25/2012 Charlotte Foley San Jose California 95136 United States 6/25/2012 Michael Gardner Los Angeles California 90027 United States 6/25/2012 Scott McQueen Campbell California 95008 United States 6/25/2012 Marcia Nelson Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 6/25/2012 James Bangsund San Jose California 95136 United States 6/25/2012 Joe Applebaum San Jose California 95123 United States 6/25/2012 Marilyn Walker San Jose, California 95124 United States 6/25/2012 Taissa Kuncio Port Washington New York 11050 United States 6/25/2012 Christiane Clark san jose California 95127 United States 6/25/2012 Barbara Rebillot Campbell California 95008 United States 6/25/2012 Eric Schnell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/25/2012 Tim Linerud Belmont California 94002 United States 6/25/2012 Terry Purcell Cupertino California 95014 United States 6/25/2012 Fred Terzian San Jose California 95129 United States 6/25/2012 George Howe San Jose California 95125 United States 6/25/2012 Antoinette Impey United States 6/25/2012 Cynthia Brown San Jose California 95120 United States 6/25/2012 susan saso san Jose California 95125 United States 6/25/2012 Ted Glogovac United States 6/25/2012 Shirley Greenwood Santa Cruz California 95060 United States 6/25/2012 Debra Dewey Medina Ohio 44256 United States 6/25/2012 paul ayars santa clara California 95050-6944 United States 6/25/2012 Judith Rice Santa Cruz California 95062 United States 6/25/2012 Frank Sweeney San Jose California 95123 United States 6/25/2012 Kathleen Coffee San Jose California 95125 United States 6/25/2012 Dane Hansen Campbell California 95008 United States 6/25/2012 Dave Wesendunk San Jose California 95130 United States 6/25/2012 Hella Bluhm-Stieber San Jose California 95129 United States 6/26/2012 S Joyce aurora Colorado 80015 United States 6/26/2012 Sally Howe Campbell California 95008 United States 6/26/2012 Jeff Lee United States 6/26/2012 Mary Mueller San Jose California 95120 United States 6/26/2012 Kristi Berryessa San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Carroll Franklin Oakdale California 95361 United States 6/26/2012 Tom and Charmaine Rogers 93110 United States 6/26/2012 Paul Liebenberg 95023 United States 6/26/2012 Dwight Denton San Jose California 95120 United States 6/26/2012 Vincent D'Amico Campbell California 95008 United States 6/26/2012 Bev Walker San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Anthony Correia Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 6/26/2012 AbelinoR anaya San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Jose Chavez San Jose California 95148 United States 6/26/2012 Rialena Bradbury San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Nathalie Mosbach Saratoga California 95070 United States 6/26/2012 Brett Kelley San Jose California 95136 United States 6/26/2012 Michael Cook Milpitas California 95035 United States 6/26/2012 Dean Wilhelm Sausalito California 96966-3064 United States 6/26/2012 Thomas Wurster Fresno California 93730 United States 6/26/2012 Jack Smith Morro Bay California 93442 United States 6/26/2012 bogdan marian 95032 United States 6/26/2012 Lisa Tate Scottsdale Arizona 85258 United States 6/26/2012 Jim Mort Campbell California 95008 United States 6/26/2012 Mona Schorow San Jose California 95129 United States 6/26/2012 Jane Parks-McKay 95062 United States 6/26/2012 Joseph Halbleib Fremont California 94555 United States 6/26/2012 Matt Carriere San Jose California 95120 United States 6/26/2012 Sean Swift San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 John Chen Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 6/26/2012 David Ballard United States 6/26/2012 Trent Giehler United States 6/26/2012 Diana Mann Corning California 96021 United States 6/26/2012 Marcel Stieber San Luis Obispo California 93410 United States 6/26/2012 David Close San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Herbert Sanders Fremont California 94538 United States 6/26/2012 Elizabeth Palmer San jose California 95128-2343 United States 6/26/2012 David Semon San Antonio Texas 78258 United States 6/26/2012 Dirk De Bruyker San Jose California 95128 United States 6/26/2012 Norine Kimmy 95132 United States 6/26/2012 Ronnie Correia San Joise California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 John Beach Redwood City California 94062-2246 United States 6/26/2012 Christine Kyne United States 6/26/2012 Steven Rudd Hampton Virginia 23669 United States 6/26/2012 James Hansen oceanside,ca California 92056 United States 6/26/2012 Matthew Torrens San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Michael Carter Lancaster Pennsylvania 17603 United States 6/26/2012 Bryan Coffland United States 6/26/2012 Phuong Nguyen Gilroy California 95020 United States 6/26/2012 sherry drinkall kuna Idaho 83634 United States 6/26/2012 Joyce Seal Fort Walton Beach Florida 32547 United States 6/26/2012 Mike Kubani 95136 United States 6/26/2012 Karen Demonbreum 37128 United States 6/26/2012 Thomas Scanlan Breckenridge Colorado 80424 United States 6/26/2012 Shannon McElyea Saratoga California 95070 United States 6/26/2012 Phyllis Willis Dothan Alabama 36305 United States 6/26/2012 Rachel Gadde Webb Alabama 36376 United States 6/26/2012 Gene McManus Baltimore Ohio 43105 United States 6/26/2012 Daniel Hingle San Jose California 95118 United States 6/26/2012 William Calhoun United States 6/26/2012 Thomas Reed United States 6/26/2012 bob alien san jose California 95118 United States 6/26/2012 Josh Davidson 95030 United States 6/26/2012 April Halberstadt United States 6/26/2012 Hans Roos United States 6/26/2012 Brandon Thomas San Jose California 95130 United States 6/26/2012 Bronwyn Johnston San Mateo California 94403 United States 6/26/2012 Mary Denney Los Gatos California 95030 United States 6/26/2012 Deb Rush Boise Idaho 83709 United States 6/26/2012 Hubert Ryan Tucson Arizona 85748 United States 6/26/2012 E Ong 95123-3928 United States 6/26/2012 Arla Van Limburg United States 6/26/2012 Marie Stevens San Jose California 95124 United States 6/26/2012 Ronald Hochsprung Los Gatos California 95033 United States 6/26/2012 Zack Snyder Gilroy California 95020 United States 6/26/2012 Patrick Bressler Mt.Aukum California 95656 United States 6/26/2012 jennifer correia United States 6/26/2012 Janae Copper Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/26/2012 Charles Bartlett San Jose California 95118 United States 6/26/2012 Brandon Hammersley San Jose California 95133 United States 6/26/2012 mike ferguson san jose California 95124 United States 6/26/2012 Scott Twomey San Ramon California 94582 United States 6/26/2012 Dan Coughlin Sumter South Carolina 29154 United States 6/26/2012 John Slenter 95042 United States 6/26/2012 Mary Berger San Jose California 5125 United States 6/26/2012 Lawrence Knaff 59936 United States 6/26/2012 LaDonna Weldon Wetumpka Alabama 36092 United States 6/26/2012 BRUCE BRODERSEN PEACHTREE CITY GA Georgia 30269 United States 6/26/2012 Darcy Yaley 95006 United States 6/26/2012 diane wyant san Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 Kevin Hart United States 6/26/2012 Marilyn Doyle San Jose California 95118 United States 6/26/2012 Paul Olivo Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/26/2012 Gene Gentrup United States 6/26/2012 Dr.James W. Reede Jr. Sacramento California 95823-7604 United States 6/26/2012 William Faryna Kamloops B.C. V213 31-9 Canada' 6/26/2012 Frank Maio Great Mills Maryland 20634-2005 United States 6/26/2012 Sandi Salvo Phoenix Arizona 85048 United States 6/26/2012 Scott Schlachter San Jose California 95118 United States 6/26/2012 Arthur Boudreault San Rafael California 94901 United States 6/26/2012 Jesse Craddock Los Altos California 94024 United States 6/26/2012 Donald Bankston Arlington Texas 76017 United States 6/26/2012 Bob Rowlands Hollister California 95023 United States 6/26/2012 chris zervos Santa Clara California 95050 United States 6/26/2012 Marco Soldano San Jose California 95124 United States 6/26/2012 Marvin Wurster Fresno California 93710 United States 6/26/2012 steve hughey chandler Arizona 85224 United States 6/26/2012 Daniel Abernethy Santa Cruz California 95062 United States 6/26/2012 Leon Pappanastos Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/26/2012 Taylor Wing San Jose California 95120 United States 6/26/2012 Neil Miles San Jose California 95127 United States 6/26/2012 Ryan Nelson Hoover Alabama 35244 United States 6/26/2012 John Falk Redding California 96002 United States 6/26/2012 Albert Boucher Fairview Heights Illinois 62208 United States 6/26/2012 Dion Dangzalan San Jose California 95120 United States 6/26/2012 Jackson Wymer Butler Pennsylvania 16001 United States 6/26/2012 George Haye Los Gatos California 95033 United States 6/26/2012 Preservation Action Council of San Jose San Jose California 95112 United States 6/26/2012 Ralph B Wilks Colby Kansas 67701 United States 6/26/2012 Justin Williams San Jose California 95138 United States 6/26/2012 Jean Dresden San Jose California 95125 United States 6/26/2012 Kenneth Nystrom Aitkin Minnesota 56431 United States 6/26/2012 Michael Candeaux Los Gatos California 95033 United States 6/26/2012 robert dublin elwood Illinois 60421 United States 6/26/2012 Carl Tuttle San Jose California 95126 United States 6/26/2012 Janis Kolte San Jose California 95125 United States 6/26/2012 scott clark United States 6/26/2012 jerry klauck north prairie Wisconsin 53153 United States 6/26/2012 Paul Twombly Saratoga California 95070 United States 6/26/2012 harry williams santa clara California 95051 United States 6/26/2012 Stacie Hrabal San Jose California 95126 United States 6/26/2012 Susan Stene San Jose California 95125 United States 6/26/2012 Sunday Marzano United States 6/26/2012 Juwayron Brownstone Oakland California 94607 United States 6/26/2012 Cathy Giblin San Jose California 05125 United States 6/26/2012 isaias job fremont California 94536 United States 6/26/2012 Elaine Cropper 95125 United States 6/26/2012 Renee Erez san jose California 95124 United States 6/26/2012 LiAnne Olstinske 95125 United States 6/26/2012 Chantal Stieber San Jose California 95129 United States 6/26/2012 Karen Scoffone San Jose California 95126 United States 6/26/2012 Daniel Callahan Gilroy California 95020 United States 6/26/2012 Jonathan Wallace Orlando Florida 32808 United States 6/26/2012 Lynn Penoyer San Jose California 95136 United States 6/26/2012 Carol Sippel San Jose California 95126 United States 6/26/2012 Roland Lebrun San lose California 95119 United States 6/26/2012 Mark La Core United States 6/26/2012 Ben Troxell San Jose California 95118 United States 6/26/2012 Rosa Zavatteri San Jose California 95124 United States 6/26/2012 Jeanne Parzygnot San Jose California 95125 United States 6/26/2012 John Pisacane San Jose California 95125 United States 6/26/2012 Scott correia San Jose California 95119 United States 6/26/2012 Joshua Marcotte San Jose California 95125 United States 6/26/2012 Chuck Skinner Gainesville Virginia 20155 United States 6/26/2012 Jamie Casanova San Jose California 95126 United States 6/26/2012 Deborah Torrens San Jose California 95123 United States 6/26/2012 SUSAN GROVER san jose California 95120 United States 6/26/2012 George Herrick Chittenden Vermont 5737 United States 6/26/2012 Bob Guillot San Jose, California 95126 United States 6/26/2012 Rosa Escalera San Jose California 95111 United States 6/26/2012 Gregory Mauro Exeter California 93221 United States 6/26/2012 Tom Abbott United States 6/26/2012 Alan Kayser Los Gatos California 95031 United States 6/26/2012 Rick Hyman Los Altos California 94022 United States 6/27/2012 Kenneth Dunnington United States 6/27/2012 henry kramer 94025 United States 6/27/2012 Ralph Pearce San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Chris Turner Mountain View California 94040 United States 6/27/2012 Joyce Keckler San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Joyce Banks San Jose California 95127 United States 6/27/2012 Wayne Setzer Charlotte North Carolina 28205 United States 6/27/2012 kathleen thorne san jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Katharyn Fletcher San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 John Kwaczala fresno California 93727 United States 6/27/2012 Thomas Clark San jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Pat Carthy Phoenix Arizona 85050 United States 6/27/2012 Gene Pierce San Jose California 95118-3036 United States 6/27/2012 Roberta Jaques San Jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Michael Tierney San Jose California 95112 United States 6/27/2012 Jason Dorsey San Jose California 95136 United States 6/27/2012 Virginia Byers campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Theresa Cadatal San Jose California 95136 United States 6/27/2012 Aaron Mackley San Jose California 95136 United States 6/27/2012 Carol Arnoldy San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Lara Fabans 95032 United States 6/27/2012 Dan Stephenson Sacramento California 95842 United States 6/27/2012 Wes Bartlett San Jose California 95118 United States 6/27/2012 Dave Young Paradise California 95969 United States 6/27/2012 Leah Ginsky Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/27/2012 Zac Perazzo San Jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Dennis Dresti 95032 United States 6/27/2012 Greg Howaniec United States 6/27/2012 kevin Avila 95130 United States 6/27/2012 David Nelson United States 6/27/2012 Paul Gregory Palo Alto California 94306 United States 6/27/2012 Caitlin Bylina San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Drew Perkins Davenport California 95017 United States 6/27/2012 JON MAESTRI Junction City California 96048 United States 6/27/2012 Jody TEMPEL San Jose California 951202016 United States 6/27/2012 Tim Mackley Playa Del Rey California 90293 United States 6/27/2012 Steve Wing San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Joyce Wing San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Benjamin Heckemeyer San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Christine Dorsey San Jose California 95136 United States 6/27/2012 Evelyn Wing United States 6/27/2012 David Yee San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Sally Zarnowitz San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Gretchen Baisa United States 6/27/2012 Ronald Horii San Jose California 95123 United States 6/27/2012 Jacob Parker 95032 United States 6/27/2012 Helen Chapman San Jose California 95126 United States 6/27/2012 Amy Unruh San Jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Jim Aspinwall Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Johanna Padilla San Jose California 95127 United States 6/27/2012 katy grischy 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Diana Vara Campbell California 95011 United States 6/27/2012 Lawrence Ames San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 christine jnight San Jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Kathy King Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Tracie Stamp Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Ann Garino 95008 United States 6/27/2012 TAO Wang Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Milton Carris Cupertino California 95014 United States 6/27/2012 Loren Thomas Belmont California 94002 United Mates 6/27/2012 Jerry Lee San Jose California 95129 United States 6/27/2012 Lauren Auser San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Barbara Goldstein San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Trisha Boltz Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Larry Johnson Cameron Wisconsin 54822 United States 6/27/2012 Larry Larson Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 6/27/2012 Caprice Scarborough San Jose California 95123 United States 6/27/2012 John Wing La Mesa California 91940 United States 6/27/2012 Hal Eden Seattle Washington 98115 United States 6/27/2012 melissa kern san jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Kristen Buck San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Brad Waldron Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 6/27/2012 Mike Shirley-Donnelly United States 6/27/2012 J.Meridian San Jose California 95118 United States 6/27/2012 Jeff Horning San Jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Lt Col Gugy Irving,USAF,Ret. Oxford Maryland 21654 United States 6/27/2012 David Alexander Boulder Colorado 80305 United States 6/27/2012 Sabrina Lambert 95112 United States 6/27/2012 Ej Brookes Newbury RG14 United Kingdom 6/27/2012 Lisa Harmer Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Denis Golemis Rocklin California 95677 United States 6/27/2012 REX HILL SAN JOSE California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Dianne Sutton Folsom California 95630 United States 6/27/2012 Chris Tann San Jose California 95119 United States 6/27/2012 Mike Blunt Antioch California 94531 United States 6/27/2012 Scott Fulton San Jose California 95117 United States 6/27/2012 Dewey Paris Pasadena Texas 77503-1515 United States 6/27/2012 steve klise campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Susan hall san jose California 95126 United States 6/27/2012 Joe Dickens Santa Clara California 95050 United States 6/27/2012 Jerald stotts San Jose California 95042 United States 6/27/2012 Gary Gates Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Doug Billington 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Daniel Ryan Menlo Park California 94025 United States 6/27/2012 William Cook Bellingham Washington 98229 United States 6/27/2012 Jeff Patton 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Michael Do Couto Salinas California 93908 United States 6/27/2012 corey ward United States 6/27/2012 Dave Falkenburg San Jose California 95129 United States 6/27/2012 Joanne Andrade Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Betsy Fessler Campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Philip Percy United States 6/27/2012 Mischa Plesha San Jose California 95118 United States 6/27/2012 Bill Preston Byron Georgia 31008 United States 6/27/2012 Cheryl Royer Castro Valley California 94546 United States 6/27/2012 nicky swanson Santa clara California 95051 United States 6/27/2012 Cris Schiebold Los Altos Hills California 94022 United States 6/27/2012 Carmel D Forte San Jose California 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Edith Csaba-Gallant United States 6/27/2012 Jessica Shirley-Donnelly San Jose California 95136 United States 6/27/2012 christine keller campbell California 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Rosalie Price Saratoga California 95070 United States 6/27/2012 Katherine Mirassou Santa Barbara California 93107 United States 6/27/2012 Brett McLarney San Jose California 95128-5120 United States 6/27/2012 Peter Learmonth San Jose California 95118 United States 6/27/2012 Susanne Tobin San Jose California 95126 United States 6/27/2012 GEOFFREY HARMER SAN JOSE California 95126 United States 6/27/2012 Ward Fogelsanger Gilbert Arizona 85297 United States 6/27/2012 Mary Lindsay United States 6/27/2012 adam kirkland United States 6/27/2012 Robert Bryant Santa Clara California 95050 United States 6/27/2012 Lara Caldwell San Jose California 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Matthew Boxberger United States 6/27/2012 Alex Chen United States 6/27/2012 Lowell Klaisner United States 6/27/2012 Michele Anderson San Jose California 95131 United States 6/27/2012 Warren van Brunt Long Beach California 90804 United States 6/27/2012 Denell Lanphear 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Tara Carriere San Jose California 95120 United States 6/27/2012 Jeanette Tonini United States 6/28/2012 Peter Groot 95120 United States 6/28/2012 Bob Morrison 94086 United States 6/28/2012 Barbara Alexander Los Gatos California 95032 United States 6/28/2012 Robert Fata Campbell California 95008 United States 6/28/2012 Ron Taylor United States 6/28/2012 AUDEL RODRIGUEZ WARNER ROBINS Georgia 31093 United States 6/28/2012 Cliff Heckathorn Anchor Point Alaska 99556 United States 6/28/2012 Michael Maguire United States 6/28/2012 Gunita Saxena Campbell California 95008 United States 6/28/2012 Kerri Webster Benedetti aptos California 95003 United States 6/28/2012 Mary McCuistion SAN JOSE California 95125 United States 6/28/2012 James Long San Jose California 95110 United States 6/28/2012 Rick Silvestri San Jose California 95123 United States 6/28/2012 Tina Nelms San Jose California 95120 United States 6/28/2012 Denise Lowney Campbell California 95008 United States 6/28/2012 Jesse Daugherty Clarkesville Georgia 30523 United States 6/28/2012 Joan Howard 95120 United States 6/28/2012 Aileen Teren-Foster 95037 United States 6/28/2012 Jim Thielemann California 94025 United States 6/28/2012 Lisa Lubliner San Jose California 95120 United States 6/28/2012 Hugh Graham San Jose California 95125 United States 6/28/2012 Paul Marshall San Jose California 95112 United States 6/28/2012 Luis Aragon san jose California 95116 United States 6/28/2012 Joe Enfantino Los Gatos California 95031-0746 United States 6/28/2012 William Gallagher San Jose California 95120 United States 6/28/2012 Kathleen O'Connorf San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Liz Guerra San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Richard Schumacher San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Glenda Lucas San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Stewart Bartlett Los Gatos California 95030 United States 6/29/2012 Beth Ahlquist Campbell California 95008 United States 6/29/2012 Suzanne Felton 95125 United States 6/29/2012 Anthony Smrdeli Santa Clara California 95051 United States 6/29/2012 B Barrett San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Harriett McGuire Milpitas California 95035 United States 6/29/2012 William Martorano Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 6/29/2012 Dianne Kobesak San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Carol Wolf San Jose California 95123 United States 6/29/2012 Liv Ames San Jose California 95125 United States 6/29/2012 Bonnie Turner Lincoln California 95648 United States 6/29/2012 Julie Scheve San Jose California 95125 United States 6/29/2012 John Foot San Jose California 95120 United States 6/29/2012 Adina Pierce San Jose California 95136 United States 6/30/2012 Ken Williams Raleigh North Carolina 27616 United States 6/30/2012 John Abbruscato San Jose California 95120 United States 6/30/2012 Doris Zervos 95123 United States 6/30/2012 Paul White Si California 95120 United States 6/30/2012 Kristine Ferguson United States 6/30/2012 Jason Ferguson United States 6/30/2012 Marlin Deckert San Jose California 95120 United States 6/30/2012 Carl Hanks United States 6/30/2012 Audra Deckert San Jose California 95120 United States 6/30/2012 Annie Deckert San Jose California 95120 United States 6/30/2012 Gail Heckemeyer Davis United States 6/30/2012 diane elizondo San Jose, California 95123 United States 7/1/2012 Cathy Sheehan San Jose California 95120 United States 7/1/2012 Mary Feldman 95126 United States 7/1/2012 John Tianen Tucson Arizona 85750 United States 7/1/2012 William Bernard San Jose California 95120 United States 7/1/2012 Olaf&Tanya Jorgenson United States 7/1/2012 Bruce Coffland Redwood City California 94062 United States 7/1/2012 Leon C.Gall United States 7/1/2012 Gwendolyn Davis New Almaden, California 95042 United States 7/1/2012 Ed Hannum Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/1/2012 Jeffrey Ferrier San Jose California 95117 United States 7/1/2012 Gwen Hacker San Jose California 95120 United States 7/1/2012 michael krisman campbell California 95008 United States 7/2/2012 Daniel Curry Redwood City California 94061 United States 7/2/2012 Keith Loney Warner Robins Georgia 31088 United States 7/2/2012 Michael Bedard San Jose California 95112 United States 7/2/2012 Kristen McIntyre Fremont California 94538 United States 7/2/2012 michael sampognaro Morgan Hill, California 95037 United States 7/2/2012 Barbara Drummond United States 7/2/2012 Andrew Korsak 94062 United States 7/2/2012 edward lopez San Francisco California 94112 United States 7/2/2012 charles unger bakersfield California 93312 United States 7/2/2012 James Hoffman Georgetown Texas 78626 United States 7/2/2012 Jimmy Allen Fort Worth Texas 76109 United States 7/2/2012 WILLIAM GRACE VALRICO Florida 33596 United States 7/2/2012 MARIANNA GRACE VALRICO Florida 33596 United States 7/2/2012 Franklin Aldridge Lodi California 95240 United States 7/2/2012 Ronald McIntosh Wagoner Oklahoma 74467 United States 7/2/2012 LAWRENCE REBARCHIK REDWOOD CITY California 94063 United States 7/2/2012 Gayle Byers San Jose California 95120 United States 7/2/2012 Cindy Toffey San Jose California United States 7/2/2012 Carole Szilasie Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 7/2/2012 David Hoyt San Jose California 95120 United States 7/2/2012 Brian Bonafede 95124 United States 7/2/2012 Mary Beth Gay United States 7/3/2012 Benjamin Niu San Jose California 95118 United States 7/3/2012 Russ Lucas San Jose California 95120 United States 7/3/2012 J P Zussman Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/3/2012 janice reynolds san Jose California 95120 United States 7/3/2012 Dayne Reast 95120 United States 7/3/2012 KEN HAZEN SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 7/3/2012 Ramona Adraktas San Jose California 95124 United States 7/3/2012 Anthony steimle 95120 United States 7/3/2012 William Desler sanjose California 95120 United States 7/3/2012 Heidi Lucas United States 7/3/2012 jell wyman Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/3/2012 Joyce Brock United States 7/3/2012 Jessica Matthew sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/3/2012 William Hourigan Los Angeles California 90034 United States 7/3/2012 Marcus Padro San Jose California 95118 United States 7/3/2012 Jennifer Hoyt San Jose California 95120 United States 7/3/2012 Kathy Sullivan Morgan Hill California 95037 United ttates 7/3/2012 Connie Bedard San Jose California 95112 United States 7/3/2012 Walter Ericson San Diego California 92131 United States 7/3/2012 Suzanne Sidensol 95136 United States 7/4/2012 Dana Thornbury Dillsburg Pennsylvania 17019 United States 7/4/2012 Paul Petach Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/4/2012 Jeffrey Jones San Jose California 95112 United States 7/4/2012 Charles Spencer United States 7/4/2012 Linda Spencer San Jose California 95120 United States 7/4/2012 Marielle Cedeno Cudahy California 90201 United States 7/4/2012 Catherine Pittman San Jose California 95120 United States 7/4/2012 Ted McGee San Jose California 95154 United States 7/4/2012 Joshua Ainslie United States 7/4/2012 Barbara barclay Sparks Nevada 89441 United States 7/4/2012 Alex Haas Vancouver Washington 98664 United States 7/4/2012 ed peterson United States 7/4/2012 Steve Wilson Fremont California 94539 United States 7/4/2012 Angela Pappanastos Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/4/2012 Colleen Kirker San Jose California 95120 United States 7/4/2012 Phil Hawkins Mountain View California United States 7/4/2012 James Zoland Vancouver Washington 98664 United States 7/4/2012 Matt Lawler San Jose California 95123 United States 7/4/2012 Rene Banks San Jose California 95127 United States 7/4/2012 Martin Jackson Aptos California 95003 United States 7/4/2012 Carol Sher 95032 United States 7/4/2012 Peter Fuerst Palo Alto California 94306 United States 7/4/2012 Sandi Stranahan Smartsville California 95977 United States 7/4/2012 Kelly Healy Clinton Iowa 52732 United States 7/4/2012 Amitabh Garg santa cruz California 65060 United States 7/4/2012 Jennifer Holmdahl San Jose California 95123 United States 7/4/2012 Paul Chesterman Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/5/2012 Kenneth Johnston Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/5/2012 Sabina Johnston Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/5/2012 Stephanie M.Brown San Jose California 95126 United States 7/5/2012 Rob Riley Menlo Park California 94025 United States 7/5/2012 Richard Garno Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/5/2012 Nick Luesing San Rafael California 94901 United States 7/5/2012 michael colzani Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/5/2012 kassandra killer elliott Alhambra California 91801 United States 7/5/2012 Dave Jenson 95123 United States 7/5/2012 Linda Wilson Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/5/2012 Carol Nunes-McNamara El Dorado California 95623 United States 7/5/2012 Scott Wiebe United States 7/5/2012 Edward Doherty Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/6/2012 Jim Knoll United States 7/6/2012 David Wilson United States 7/6/2012 Monica Pound Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/6/2012 gary miskimon San Jose California 95125 United States 7/6/2012 Don Nordloff San lose California 95120 United States 7/6/2012 Ashley Blinn Cameron Park California 95682 United States 7/6/2012 Patrick Wicker Danville California United States 7/6/2012 Robert Tolley Gastonia North Carolina 28056-9610 United States 7/6/2012 Gale Infeld San Jose California 95120 United States 7/6/2012 Anthony Mogannam San jose California 95120 United States 7/6/2012 Nancy Williams San Jose California 95130 United States 7/6/2012 Vanessa Pacheco San Jose California 95128 United States 7/6/2012 Rachael Subia San Jose California 95139 United States 7/6/2012 John Georges Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/6/2012 Rick Garza Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/6/2012 tim stockdale sacramento California 95827 7/7/2012 Martin Williams Templeton California 93465 United States 7/7/2012 doug merk San Jose California 95123 United States 7/7/2012 Nancy Williams Los Altos California 94022 United States 7/7/2012 bill maison Lucile Idaho 83542 United States 7/7/2012 Mike Williams campbell California 95008 United States 7/7/2012 Sharon Ann Sullivan San Jose California 95118-2215 United States 7/7/2012 Steve mcaulay san jose California 95123 United States 7/8/2012 Brittany Huggins Euless Texas 76039 United States 7/8/2012 Jeff Gordon 95120 7/8/2012 George Romer San Jose California 95120 United States 7/9/2012 Fred Rice Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/9/2012 Aletta Smith San Jose California 95118 7/9/2012 Curtis Keswick 95120 7/9/2012 Roderick Mclean 95035 7/9/2012 Phil Lenihan Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/9/2012 Aric Gilbrecht Cupertino California 95014 7/9/2012 Colleen Richie San Jose California 95118 United States 7/9/2012 Vernon A.Eagye Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/9/2012 Cdr Carl Honaker,USN(Ret) San Jose California 95148 United States 7/9/2012 Mike Sigman San Jose California 95125 United States 7/9/2012 Jessica Gordon Menlo Park California 94025 United States 7/9/2012 Grace Bates San Jose California 95120 United States 7/9/2012 Josie Supencheck San Jose California 95136 United States 7/9/2012 David Mantelli Saratoga California 95070 United States 7/9/2012 Phil Garner Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/10/2012 Wayne Britt San Jose California 95136 United States 7/10/2012 Wendy Campbell San Jose California 95 United States 7/10/2012 Karl Leek Monterey California 93940 United States 7/10/2012 Nancy Carrick Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/10/2012 Louella Parrish Abilene Texas 79605 United States 7/10/2012 james richardson Mesa,Az. Arizona 85205 United States 7/10/2012 Scott Kruckman Windsor California 95492 United States 7/10/2012 CAROL SMEAD SANTA CLARA California 95051 United States 7/10/2012 Clyde Horn San Jose California 95124 United States 7/10/2012 Jim Nolan San Jose California 95125 United States 7/10/2012 Jaime Pirnie Tracy California 95376 United States 7/10/2012 Mary Bartlett los gatos California 95030 United States 7/10/2012 Brian Hewitt San Jose California 95124 United States 7/10/2012 Gillian Hertzer Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/10/2012 Paul Cardona Campbell California 95008 United States 7/10/2012 suzanne Crawford santa clara California 95050 United States 7/10/2012 Kavita Nirma) San Jose California 95120 United States 7/10/2012 Michael Hertzer Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/10/2012 Mike Miller Spring Valley California 91977 United States 7/10/2012 David White Grovespring Missouri 65662 United States 7/10/2012 Dominic Mazzone San Jose California 95111 United States 7/10/2012 Kathleen Gregory Keysville Virginia 23947 United States 7/10/2012 Charles Haynes Campbell California 95008 United States 7/10/2012 Sabrina Davies Mountain View California 94040 United States 7/11/2012 Jo Ann De Toro San Jose California 95120 United States 7/11/2012 David Nesbet San Francisco California 94114 United States 7/11/2012 Tyler Woodside San Jose California 95118 United States 7/11/2012 Wayne A Witzel Custer Washington 98240-9407 United States 7/11/2012 A Smurthwaite Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/11/2012 maryjane donofrio cupertino California 95014 United States 7/11/2012 Sheldon Chang Campbell California 95008 United States 7/11/2012 Patricia Guthrie San Jose California 95139 United States 7/11/2012 Ellen Finch San Jose California 95136 United States 7/11/2012 Rich Parker San Jose California 95119 United States 7/11/2012 CHARLES FINNEGAN Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 7/11/2012 Rick Rice Clovis California 93612 United States 7/11/2012 Sam Drake San Jose California 95119 United States 7/11/2012 Sean Sullivan Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/11/2012 Paul Vincze San Jose California 95119 United States 7/11/2012 Don DeBold San Jose California 95123 United States 7/11/2012 Matt Jennings San Jose California 95112 United States 7/11/2012 Janet Rodriguez East Palo Alto California 94303 United States 7/11/2012 Richard Bernhardt Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/11/2012 Christy Toth Mentor Ohio 44060 United States 7/11/2012 Dani McKenzie Roy Washington 98580 United States 7/11/2012 George Koetters Sioux City Iowa 51106 United States 7/11/2012 Sean Strycker San Jose California 95112 United States 7/11/2012 Kim McArthur San Jose California 95136 United States 7/11/2012 michelle Bunn San Diego California 92128 United States 7/12/2012 Dorene Boulland San Jose California 95120 United States 7/12/2012 Amanda Mills Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/12/2012 Holden Neal Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/12/2012 David McGlauflin Bangor Maine 4401 United States 7/12/2012 Steven Plewes SAN JOSE California 95119 United States 7/12/2012 Jenel Vincze San Jose California 95119 United States 7/12/2012 Cameron Vincze San Jose California 95119 United States 7/12/2012 Lucy Costanza San Jose California 95121 United States 7/12/2012 Paul Christoferson Elk Grove California 95624 United5tates 7/12/2012 Jim Carrigan Malvern Pennsylvania 19355 United States 7/12/2012 John Wilson Chattanooga Tennessee 37416 United States 7/12/2012 Steven Rapinchuk San Jose California 95136 United States 7/12/2012 Frederick Ditzler York Pennsylvania 17408 United States 7/12/2012 Scott Browning Portland Oregon 97233 United States 7/12/2012 James Ibaugh LANDISVILLE Pennsylvania 17538-1929 United States 7/12/2012 Shawn Coughlan Colorado Springs Colorado 80922 United States 7/12/2012 Steve Wood San Jose California 95134 United States 7/12/2012 John Taber Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/12/2012 Tony Ruiz San Jose California 95123 United States 7/12/2012 Chris O'Connell Sonoma California 95476 United States 7/12/2012 Larry Crist Nashville Tennessee 37205 United States 7/12/2012 Indra Singhal San Jose California 95129 United States 7/12/2012 Kellee O'Connell Sonoma California 95476 United States 7/12/2012 Duane Rapelje Everett Washington 98201 United States 7/12/2012 Donald G Jaspers Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 United States 7/12/2012 John Stephens Maxeys Georgia 30671 United States 7/12/2012 David Ullstrom San Jose California 95120 United States 7/12/2012 Michael Sherback Mountain View California 94043 United States 7/12/2012 brenda hamilton Springfield Missouri 65803 United States 7/13/2012 Ralph Carrigan Waretown New Jersey 08758-2105 United States 7/13/2012 Hal Wilson Taylorsville Utah 84129 United States 7/13/2012 Nancy Halverson-Few Tempe Arizona 85282-7317 United States 7/13/2012 angela williams Kihei Hawaii 96753 United States 7/13/2012 ROBERT LOZANO HATLINGEN Texas 78550 United States 7/13/2012 Mike Carrigan Ocean Grove New Jersey 7756 United States 7/13/2012 Elaine Durand San Jose California 95125 United States 7/13/2012 Coralie Elliott Victoria V9AIV4 Canada 7/13/2012 Debra Blackburn Salinas California 93906 United States 7/13/2012 Belinda Valdivia Rio Rancho New Mexico 87144 United States 7/13/2012 cathy meyer-connoily new almaden California 95042 United States 7/13/2012 art herkomer oakland New Jersey 7436 United States 7/13/2012 Charles Graf San Jose California 95120 United States 7/13/2012 vince smith los osos California 93402 United States 7/13/2012 sean head San jose California 95112 United States 7/13/2012 Craig Scott Watervliet New York 12189 United States 7/13/2012 Charles Glover Savanah Georgia 31406 United States 7/13/2012 Rudy Kilianski Scottdale Arizona 85259 United States 7/13/2012 charles batson midlothian Virginia 23114 United States 7/13/2012 Paul Smith Wichita Kansas 67201 United States 7/13/2012 Eric Richards Loveland Colorado 80537 United States 7/13/2012 gary pittebger Oceano California 93445 United States 7/13/2012 John Moyer San Jose California 95120 United States 7/13/2012 Linda Jentz Santa Cruz California 95060 United States 7/14/2012 Dana Crom San Jose California 95120 United States 7/14/2012 Matt Ashe Tuolumne California 95379 United States 7/14/2012 Carrie Ashe tuolumne California 95379 United States 7/14/2012 jeff harrington papillion Nebraska 68046 United States 7/14/2012 Matt Bialick monte sereno California 95030 United States 7/14/2012 Sharon Rippetoe Madera California 93638 United States 7/14/2012 Angie Zervos San Jose California 95123 United States 7/14/2012 Rick Pendleton Tollhouse California 93667 United States 7/14/2012 Darvis McCoy San Jose California 95123 United States 7/14/2012 Bonnie Thomas Largo Florida 33771 United States 7/14/2012 Gary Hagan Mustang Oklahoma 73064 United States 7/14/2012 Paul Kostecki San Jose California 95123 United States 7/14/2012 Victor Aelion Oakland California 94602 United States 7/14/2012 MJ Crist Fort Lauderdale Florida 33301 United States 7/14/2012 Jeffrey Baird San Jose California 95139 United States 7/15/2012 Roger Howard Hollister California 95023 United States 7/15/2012 Gloria Mills Colton South Dakota 57018 United States 7/15/2012 Joel Deuter Palo Alto California 94301 United States 7/15/2012 William Estrada n/a California 95042 United States 7/15/2012 William Seal Vernon Florida 32462 United States 7/15/2012 richard Chinn sammamish Washington 98074 United States 7/15/2012 Trisha Haugen Fresno California 93727 United States 7/15/2012 Steven Rudd Hampton Virginia 23669 United States 7/15/2012 John LeBlanc Troy Ohio 45373 United States 7/15/2012 Bob Fleming-Jones 7/15/2012 Marguerite Newton San Jose California 95118 United States 7/15/2012 Roger Marchant 7/16/2012 George Tull Gatesville Texas 76528 United States 7/16/2012 Robb Moore San Jose California 95128 United States 7/16/2012 Paul Barrish Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/16/2012 Terry Hoppins Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/16/2012 robert Madsen m hood river Oregon 97031 United States 7/16/2012 Robert Wildrick Blairsville Georgia 30512 United States 7/16/2012 Claudine Crom San Jose California 95119 United States 7/16/2012 Jim Withers Chesterfield Missouri 63017 United States 7/16/2012 Dennis Mattiuzzi Mariposa California 95338 United States 7/16/2012 Robin Bilinski san jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Sharae Gunn San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Andreas Fichter San Jose California 95126 United States 7/16/2012 Harriett McGuire Milpitas California 5035 United States 7/16/2012 Laura Coleman San Martin California 95046 United States 7/16/2012 Andrea Wheeler San Jose California 95125 United States 7/16/2012 George Griffin San Jose California 95132 United States 7/16/2012 Chris Huber San Jose California 95117 United States 7/16/2012 Oliver Cockcroft Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/16/2012 Mark Minnihan San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 D Gurrola San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Glenn Perea San Jose California 95118 United States 7/16/2012 Mark Freitas San Jose California 95123 United States 7/16/2012 Brent Neitzel San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Chris Husing Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/16/2012 Zig Shuster San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Katharine Chakraborty San Jose California 95136 United States 7/16/2012 Jack Irwin San Jose California 95123 United States 7/16/2012 Noel Seaton 7/16/2012 Kathleen Eagan San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Peter Shin San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Rich Patrino San Jose California 95128-3119 United States 7/16/2012 Bill Llewellyn San Jose California 95125 United States 7/16/2012 Patricia Burleigh San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Andrew Johnson Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/16/2012 David Shafer San Jose California 95130 United States 7/16/2012 Evan Hall San Jose California 95117 United States 7/16/2012 Erika Murphy San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 William Murphy San lose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 David Thomas San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 carol beebe San Jose California 95112 United States 7/16/2012 Doug Santos Missoula Montana 59803 United States 7/16/2012 Glen Cureton San Jose California 95118 United States 7/16/2012 Olena Kamentsev San Jose California 95129 United States 7/16/2012 David Crowley San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Chris Phegley Cupertino California 95033 United States 7/16/2012 Richard Phillips San Jose California 95118 United States 7/16/2012 Mark Fields San Jose California 95128 United States 7/16/2012 Steve Wilson Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/16/2012 David Croyle San Jose California 95124 United States 7/16/2012 Brian Perasso San Jose California 95126 United States 7/16/2012 Vernon Kirk 7/16/2012 Rebecca Sowards-Emmerd San Jose California 95124 United States 7/16/2012 Dorian Baker San Jose California 95124 United States 7/16/2012 Eric Moss San Jose California 95127 United States 7/16/2012 Kimberly Richie San Jose California 95118 United States 7/16/2012 Chao=Yee Watson San Jose California 95124 United States 7/16/2012 John Busco San Jose California 95126 United States 7/16/2012 Martin Fuller Livermore California 94551 United States 7/16/2012 Karen Pelosi 7/16/2012 sue MCALLISTER SAN 1OSE California 95133-1528 United States 7/16/2012 Leonard Martinez Fremont California 94555 United States 7/16/2012 William Anderson San Jose California 95129 United States 7/16/2012 Miko Biffle Santa Cruz California 95062 United States 7/16/2012 Abram Perlstein Los Osos California 93402 United States 7/16/2012 Karan Britt Folsom California 95630 United States 7/16/2012 Michael Barnes Boulder Creek California 95006 United States 7/16/2012 Andrei Hippix Brooklyn New York 11214 United States 7/16/2012 Chris Cassell San Jose California 95125 United States 7/16/2012 Rick Schorr Ocoee Florida 34761 United States 7/16/2012 stephan reinhardt Colorado springs Colorado 90919 United States 7/16/2012 Joseph LaPointe Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/16/2012 Darren Cole San Jose California 95136 United States 7/16/2012 dean bradley san francisco California 94107 United States 7/16/2012 derek chan privacy policy California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Tom Kearney San Jose California 95118 United States 7/16/2012 Alberto Valdez San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Darrell Earnshaw Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/16/2012 Jess Macias Morgan Hil California 95037 United States 7/16/2012 michael mcgillis Morro Bay California 93442 United States 7/16/2012 Norm Smith San Jose California 95120 United States 7/16/2012 Barbara DeBold 7/16/2012 trudi mccullum Escondido California 92029 United States 7/16/2012 James Welton San Jose California 95124 United States 7/16/2012 Amy Kennedy San Jose California 95112 United States 7/16/2012 Geoff Treadwell Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Warren Geissert 7/17/2012 doug benton san Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 RoyaJue 7/17/2012 David Keller San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Marc Cutright San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Brandon Ingram San Jose California 95116 United States 7/17/2012 Kelly Baker 7/17/2012 Deanna Wurster Fresno California 93730 United States 7/17/2012 Glenda Smith 7/17/2012 Niles Walker Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/17/2012 Ralph Silveira Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/17/2012 Andrew Ingram San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Pat Killen Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Erika Flores San Jose California 95112 United States 7/17/2012 Joel HustonJoelH San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 William Sander San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Erich Kather Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/17/2012 Brittany Killen San Diego California 92124 United States 7/17/2012 Eliz Mcglauflin Haof moon bay California 94019 United States 7/17/2012 Benny Reloba Fresno California 93704 United States 7/17/2012 Jacquelyn Yeaman Brentwood California 94513 United States 7/17/2012 peter arnst san jose California 95131 United States 7/17/2012 Jonathan Solnit San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Farid Abraham Lyons Colorado 80540 United States 7/17/2012 Karen Clinton San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Janice Fucci 7/17/2012 John Orloff San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 marguerite velasco Mountain View California 94043 United States 7/17/2012 Bryan Buck San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Joshua Santos San Jose California 95121 United States 7/17/2012 Tracey O'Rourke San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Kerry MacLennan San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 TIMOTHY SCHIERLING San Jose California 95116 United States 7/17/2012 Nancy Hill 7/17/2012 Ted Gutierrez Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 Chris Green Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Jeff king Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/17/2012 Stephanie Ingram San Jose California 95116 United States 7/17/2012 Frank Stelwagon 7/17/2012 heather dixon 7/17/2012 Elizabeth Johnson San Jose California 95127 United States 7/17/2012 Lynn Hsu San lose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 John Christie Custer South Dakota 57730 United States 7/17/2012 James Holmes San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Steven Dong Alameda California 94501 United States 7/17/2012 Will Norman Capitola California 95010 United States 7/17/2012 Matt Lee 7/17/2012 Marc Baker San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Linda Montgomery San Jose California 95117 United States 7/17/2012 Tony DePhillips Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 Bob Grandey San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Diamond Pompton Lakes New Jersey 7442 United States 7/17/2012 Joel Rojas San Jose California 95131 United States 7/17/2012 Jon Callaghan San lose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Andrew Penn San Francisco California 94127 United States 7/17/2012 Pat Dewhitt San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Thomas Firth Redwood City California 94062 United States 7/17/2012 Neil Kole San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Joseph Picone Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/17/2012 Melody Baltazar San Jose California 95130 United States 7/17/2012 Jim Usrey Little River South Carolina 29566 United States 7/17/2012 Russell mason San lose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Sidney Sun San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Sharon Haneman San Jose California 95136 United States 7/17/2012 Murlin Marks San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Kenneth Pergrem San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Ken Schreiner 7/17/2012 Caroline Waugh Phillipsburg New Jersey 8865 United States 7/17/2012 J.Tracy Weed 7/17/2012 Jean Mundell Los Gatos California 95032-7688 United States 7/17/2012 Graham Mostyn Saratoga California 95070 United States 7/17/2012 Stephen Mingrone Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Alan Figone San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Ronald Steele San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Jerome Mouton 7/17/2012 Alfonso Banuelos San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Kirk Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 HOLLY BITTER Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/17/2012 Denise Michael San Jose California 95117 United States 7/17/2012 John Hartley SUNNYVALE California 94086 United States 7/17/2012 Peter Green Santa Clara California 95052 United States 7/17/2012 Michael Danberger Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 David Hsu San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Monique Bosomworth San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Emma Noftz San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Curtis Jones San Jose California 95112-2150 United States 7/17/2012 Tom Sanders 7/17/2012 Jon Graham San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Lori Baumgartner San Jose California 95111 United States 7/17/2012 Mary Growitz San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Tom Huston 15214 United States 7/17/2012 Mary Machado Groveland California 95321 United States 7/17/2012 Ingrid Grassini San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Amit Goswamy Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/17/2012 Patricia Marcotte San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 erik buensuceso san jose California 95112 United States 7/17/2012 David Profio 7/17/2012 Bruce Frazer San jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Melanie Freeman Glendale Arizona 85308 United States 7/17/2012 David Whitlock Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/17/2012 Kelly Frazer San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Jason Otoshi San Jose California 95129-3748 United States 7/17/2012 Gail Snyder,III San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Greg Freeman San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Frank Bosche San Jose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 donald holcomb Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/17/2012 Kathleen Bonner Pacific Grove California 93950 United States 7/17/2012 Kevin Kerns San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Joe Schenck Verdi Nevada 89439 United States 7/17/2012 Edward Atlas San Jose California 95128 United States 7/17/2012 john Lee San Jose California 95138 United States 7/17/2012 david cordova santa clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 David Helms San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Jonathan Hull San Carlos California 94070 United States 7/17/2012 Sushil Patel San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 SALVADORE SERIO San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Judith Schierling San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Rod Robertson san jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Dan Morrison San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Nickolas Buchko San Josse California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Eric Wendel San Jose California 95119 United States 7/17/2012 John Kelly Albuquerque New Mexico 87120 United States 7/17/2012 Svetlana Rudnaya SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Sharon Munoz San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 patraicia oakstar 7/17/2012 Kim Aglietti San jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Thomas Kussell San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Eric Opp 7/17/2012 Jfer H sj California 95112 United States 7/17/2012 Brittney Sevo San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Kristi Stanyard South San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Mike Kriege San Jose California 95129 United States 7/17/2012 Martha Mayen 7/17/2012 Paul Washington San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Herbert Beck San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Keri Kirkpatrick Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/17/2012 Kenneth Watkins San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Rhonda Lakatos San Jose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 Donald Pelling San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Mark Nansen San Jose California 95139 United States 7/17/2012 Jon Lockwood san Jose California 95110 United States 7/17/2012 Steve Dorsey 7/17/2012 Francisco Rodriguez San Jose California 95127 United States 7/17/2012 philip and pat mclean 7/17/2012 Sharon Armstrong SAN JOSE California 951204567 United States 7/17/2012 ron whitney 7/17/2012 Chris Daleen San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Jon Schierling Fremont California 94538 United States 7/17/2012 Scott Smith San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 anthony goto San Jose California 95113 United States 7/17/2012 Peter Giannini Mountain View California 94040 United States 7/17/2012 Amy Hermstad Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 george owen 7/17/2012 Jean Stevenson San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Mark Jennings San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Stan Moore 7/17/2012 Louise Robinson San Jose California 95148 United States 7/17/2012 Matthew Sweat san jose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 Chris Kabelac Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 Katie Hassett San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Christian McWilliams Jr. San Jose California 95123-4864 United States 7/17/2012 Karen Asher 7/17/2012 Lois Bendixen San Jose California 95117 United States 7/17/2012 Jean Johnson Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/17/2012 Tammy Perry San Jose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 Terry Garrity Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/17/2012 Karla Opp 7/17/2012 Eric Hermstad Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Garrett Parzygnot San Jose California 95113 United States 7/17/2012 Kelly Noftz San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Philip C.Cosby Belmont California 94002 United States 7/17/2012 Tim Lavelle San Jose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 Nathaniel Nauseda Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/17/2012 Arthur Gilmore San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Rawley Douglas 7/17/2012 Maryann Colbeck San Jose California 95127 United States 7/17/2012 Mark Mingrone Saratoga California 95070 United States 7/17/2012 Michael Owen 7/17/2012 Susan Smith Escondido California 92029 United States 7/17/2012 Harry Robinson San Jose California 95148 United States 7/17/2012 Gordon Turner Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/17/2012 Kristina Clinton San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Phil Harris Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/17/2012 Joyce Vernali San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Jo Anne Burton Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 Brendan Coye San Jose California 95119 United States 7/17/2012 Donald&Rosanne Seratti San Jose California 95128 United States 7/17/2012 Lew Contreras 7/17/2012 Peggy Morrison 7/17/2012 Jeff Colbeck 7/17/2012 Sharon Angius San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Spencer Samson Tacoma Washington 98416 United States 7/17/2012 Joe Freitas Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/17/2012 William Dunmyer 7/17/2012 Greg Jenkins 7/17/2012 Ethelita Wallace Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/17/2012 Joan Phillips San Jose California 95117 United States 7/17/2012 Susan Hamilton San Jose California 95120-1824 United States 7/17/2012 Patricia Adams San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Ryan Kesterson San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Ruth Beck San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Erik Khoobyarian San Jose California 95110 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Reeves San Jose California 95110 United States 7/17/2012 Rajarshi Chaudhuri San Jose California 95111 United States 7/17/2012 Mark Montano Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/17/2012 John Fox morgan hill California 95037 United States 7/17/2012 Donald Kassner Los Altos California 94024 United States 7/17/2012 Jose Batto San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Barbara Davis 7/17/2012 Nancy Wylde San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Susan Kay San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Susan Barkan Mountain View California 94043 United States 7/17/2012 Jennifer Colbeck Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 Anne Nourse San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Arthur Lincoln los gatos California 95032 United States 7/17/2012 Louise Lincoln Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/17/2012 Maureen Smith San Jose California 95110 United States 7/17/2012 Austin Hartman San Jose California 95112 United States 7/17/2012 Rob Owen santa cruz California 95065 United States 7/17/2012 Ronald Wong San Jose California 95130 United States 7/17/2012 Arley DeLaRoche' San Jose California 95128 United States 7/17/2012 scott smith san Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Sunny Wagstaff San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Florence Cappelloni San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 lauralee christensen los gatos California 95030 United States 7/17/2012 Catherine Anderson San Jose California 95148 United States 7/17/2012 Sheree Kimura San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Bill Teeple San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Christine Honda San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Dennis Cannataro San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Sydney Whaley Auburn California 95603 United States 7/17/2012 George Kay San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Galen Stallings Salinas California 93906 United States 7/17/2012 Ryan Smith San Jose California 95138 United States 7/17/2012 Penny Hunter San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Valerie Ross San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 David Taue San Jose California 95129 United States 7/17/2012 Elizabeth Gordon 7/17/2012 Daniel Hendrix 7/17/2012 robbie Lamons San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Natalie Russell Pasadena California 91106 United States 7/17/2012 Karen Stayrook San Jose California 95135 United States 7/17/2012 Joy Goosmann Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/17/2012 Mary Starner Palo Alto California 94303 United States 7/17/2012 Rob Davis San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Ann Mayers San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Ron Gracia Hayward California 94545 United States 7/17/2012 Nancy Demattei San Jose California 95110 United States 7/17/2012 Kathryn Vortmann Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/17/2012 MICHAEL VINCENT San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Claire Teel New Almaden California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Kenneth Stackhouse San Jose California 95124-4809 United States 7/17/2012 Ellen Coan San Jose California 95132 United States 7/17/2012 Patricia Stackhouse San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Frank Black San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Mitchell Gale 7/17/2012 Theresa Nunez San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Eugene Greenwood San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Brian McGiffert San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Jennifer Raley Port Washington Wisconsin 53074 United States 7/17/2012 Dorsey Moore SAN JOSE California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Bertha Schrandt San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Ginny Kaminski San Jose California 95129 United States 7/17/2012 Richard Hawes Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/17/2012 Judith Gracia 7/17/2012 Mark Clayton Menlo Park California 94025 United States 7/17/2012 Mark Colbeck Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/17/2012 Dana Irwin San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 SUKHDIP GREWAL San Jose California 95111 United States 7/17/2012 Henry Ochoa 7/17/2012 Brian Wiebe San Jose California 95126 United States 7/17/2012 Maristella Greeley 7/17/2012 John Kovac Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/17/2012 Denniy Brisbin San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Wright San Jose California 95112 United States 7/17/2012 Caryl Swinyard San Jose California 95135 United States 7/17/2012 Jenn Soliz San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Tom Randall Hanford California 93230 United States 7/17/2012 Ted Earle San Jose California 95136 United States 7/17/2012 Catherine Hart San Jose California 95128 United States 7/17/2012 E.Louise Polizzotto San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Patrick Congdon Jamestown California 95327 United States 7/17/2012 Bill Hough San Jose California 95112 United States 7/17/2012 Steve Robles San Jose California 95116 United States 7/17/2012 Amitabh Sinha San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Rich Hill 7/17/2012 Michael Catalana san jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 James Gatenby San Jose California 95111 United States 7/17/2012 Lisa Mendoza San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Betty Newkirk San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Oxsen San Jose California 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Brian Alexander san jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Rao Canham Mountain View California 94043 United States 7/17/2012 Sophia Smith San Jose California 95118 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Goetze San Jose California 95136 United States 7/17/2012 Darren Kimura San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Stephen Yeh San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Sara Mingione Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Glenn Sander Campbell California 95008 United States 7/17/2012 Terry Burleson sanjose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Liddell folsom California 95630 United States 7/17/2012 Jim Foley Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/17/2012 Rich Sotelo 7/17/2012 Cathy Dougherty San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Bruce Brennan San Jose California 95117 United States 7/17/2012 Denise Johnson San lose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Rita D.Hawley San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Laura Biagini San Jose California 95123 United States 7/17/2012 Doug Tissier San Jose California 95124 United States 7/17/2012 Aaron Cummings San Jose California 95120 United States 7/17/2012 richard serna santa clara California 95053 United States 7/17/2012 Robert Black Saratoga California 95070 United States 7/17/2012 Holly Hartman San Jose California 95112 United States 7/18/2012 helen ebert San Jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Lester Spring 7/18/2012 Don DeLage San Jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Rob Mortenson San Jose California 95136 United States 7/18/2012 carl held cupertino California 95014 United States 7/18/2012 dallas hodgson cupertino California 95014-5452 United States 7/18/2012 Nancy Lepow 7/18/2012 Eileen Connolly San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Colleen Friesen 7/18/2012 Bill Ingebrigtsen Fallon Nevada 89406 United States 7/18/2012 Steven Frehe San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Robert Boyd Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 phil barbaccia San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Amanda Hart San Jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Judy Akers Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Alexan maiel sanjose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 James Foley Saratoga California 95070 United States 7/18/2012 Sally Welch O'Neals California 93645 United States 7/18/2012 Donald Arndt San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Dorothea Morris San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Michael LeClair 7/18/2012 Brenda Carlson San Jose California 95112 United States 7/18/2012 Jean Arndt San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Jack Tonkin Roseville California 95661 United States 7/18/2012 Ellen Lukanc San jose, California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Larry Custodio San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 John Gross Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 7/18/2012 Doug Lukanc San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Albert L Mouns Cupertino California 95014-5234 United States 7/18/2012 Jeff Scales San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Kairav Sinha 7/18/2012 daniel Henriod San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 John Shull Campbell California 95008 United States 7/18/2012 Debora Kaashoek San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Carrie German Woodside California 94062 United States 7/18/2012 Izetta Kennedy Campbell California 95008 United States 7/18/2012 Alan Noyes San Jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Lucille David San Jose California 95136 United States 7/18/2012 Ian Coggins San Jose California 95111 United States 7/18/2012 K.Likens San Jose California 95128 United States 7/18/2012 Tina Deluca San Jose California 95110 United States 7/18/2012 Laurel Wheeler San Jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Tim German Woodside California 94062-4560 United States 7/18/2012 Peter du Fosse San Jose California 95135 United States 7/18/2012 Murray Wicks San Jose 95136 United States 7/18/2012 Lesley Pesek San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Ken Beookshire San Jose California 95139 United States 7/18/2012 Paul Olson Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/18/2012 Derin Steele 7/18/2012 chip benson Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/18/2012 Douglas Colbeck San Jose California 95127 United States 7/18/2012 Joseph Bauer Los Gatoas California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 Henry Cuningham San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Daniel Dei Rossi Campbell California 95008 United States 7/18/2012 Andy McNelly San Jose California 95135 United States 7/18/2012 Mike Rosenbaum 7/18/2012 Andrew Perrucci Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Quinn Linda Campbell California 95008 United Mates 7/18/2012 David Guven san jose California 95111 United States 7/18/2012 Jeanette Wayman san jose California 95112 United States 7/18/2012 Lee Johnson San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Brent Johnson Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Tim Pratt Portland Oregon 97224 United States 7/18/2012 Chuck Atchison 7/18/2012 Kristin Khoobyarian New York New York 10023 United States 7/18/2012 Edward Jacklitch San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 John Cook Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 James Leonard Mountain View California 94043 United States 7/18/2012 Jane Robson 7/18/2012 John O'Connell American Canyon California 94503 United States 7/18/2012 James Mason San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Nik Gluck Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 Larry Swezey San Jose California 95136 United States 7/18/2012 Becky Yoder Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 david burnham san Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 John Lewis San Jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Joan Kirkpatrick San Jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Jeff Adams San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Steven Essad San Jose California 95136 United States 7/18/2012 Laurta Ballard San Jose California 95111 United States 7/18/2012 Ray and Maralyn Killorn San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Terry Holt Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 Nik Gluck Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 Jason Agron San Jose California 95112 United States 7/18/2012 David Sturrock Marshall Minnesota 56258 United States 7/18/2012 Thomas Leipelt Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/18/2012 ANTHONY J.ZERBO San Jose, California 95129-2404 United States 7/18/2012 Paul Tilston San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Gloria Dobbins San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Harvey Grasty Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/18/2012 george boreham san jose California 95126 United States 7/18/2012 Brian Handy LOS ANGELES California 90045 United States 7/18/2012 Gilbert Lee Fremont California 94555 United States 7/18/2012 willy fonda 7/18/2012 D Behn San Jose California 95119 United States 7/18/2012 Richard Schneider Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/18/2012 Tom Pavel San Jose California 95117 United States 7/18/2012 Jim Cardenas Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 Garth Honhart San Jose California 95126 Canada 7/18/2012 Lee McLaughlin Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Dave Burriesci San Diego California 92108 United States 7/18/2012 Aaron Burriesci San Jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Lorenzo ramos San Jose California 95128 United States 7/18/2012 Bob Moss Palo Alto California 94306 United States 7/18/2012 Aaron Carr San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Andrew Horn San Francisco California 94122 United States 7/18/2012 Matt Cucuzza Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 David Lopes Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 Mark Grimes Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Joseph Orduna San Jose California 95148 United States 7/18/2012 Gregory Gillie Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Lillian Grimes San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Carole Altman San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 William Wadley Sparks Nevada 89441 United States 7/18/2012 Mitchell Davis San Jose California 95122 United States 7/18/2012 Mike Boden San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Nancy Cole Thornton Colorado 80260 United States 7/18/2012 Christopher Horton San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 ron swinyard San Jose California 95135 United States 7/18/2012 Greg Wayman San Jose,CA California 95112 United States 7/18/2012 Jill McLaughlin Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 Naomi Ellis San jose California 95136 United States 7/18/2012 John Romano san California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Juliana Fonda New York New York 11219 United States 7/18/2012 Jennie Magid 7/18/2012 Stacey Olson San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Timothy Blum 7/18/2012 Brian Fair San Jose California 95117 United States 7/18/2012 Erik Dabel San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 PaulPesek 7/18/2012 Eileen Sargent 7/18/2012 Stephen Khoobyarian Long Beach California 90832 United States 7/18/2012 V A Phillips San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Michael Brozicevic Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Chris Kaspar Orangevale California 95662 United States 7/18/2012 Charles Bethell San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Robbie Benson San Jose California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 Diane Griego San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Lenoir Dinga San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Tamara Clayton San Jose California 95130 United States 7/18/2012 Christine Burns 7/18/2012 Richard Svec San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Tricia Parlato Herz San Jose California 95117 United States 7/18/2012 Gail Bethell San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Martin Brewer San Jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Kirk Bertolet San Jose California 95111 United States 7/18/2012 Nicholas Hoppins Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Wayne molzahn 7/18/2012 Alayne Yellum San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Henry Richards Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/18/2012 Cindy Do Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/18/2012 Don Yellum San Jose California 95124 United States 7/18/2012 Charles Myers 7/18/2012 Susan Matlock San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 mary serna mt.view California 94043 United States 7/18/2012 Melanie Stone Carrollton Texas 75007 United States 7/18/2012 Eric Jorgensen San Jose California 95132 United States 7/18/2012 john gould San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Barbara Wilmer San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Kyle Loewen Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 Carol Alviso 7/18/2012 jeffrey benson san jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Erma Halili Fremont California 94539 United States 7/18/2012 rich cirivilleri San Jose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Mick Johnson Los Angeles California 91406 United States 7/18/2012 Jane Colacicco San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Jan Fortini gilroy California 95020 United States 7/18/2012 MONROE MORRIS SAN DOSE California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 diane Benson Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/18/2012 Katherine Keller Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/18/2012 chip benson sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/18/2012 James Swanson San Lorenzo California 94580 United States 7/18/2012 Beth Crowley Oakdale California 95361 United States 7/18/2012 Brian Lawley Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 Emile Mestressaat San Jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Sharon Illges Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/18/2012 David Lopes Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/18/2012 Frederick Woodward San Jose California 95123 United States 7/18/2012 Steve Koppes Eagle Idaho 83616 United States 7/18/2012 Ed Linn San Jose California 95121 United States 7/18/2012 Russell Johnson San Jose California 95127 United States 7/18/2012 Ian Johnson San lose California 95125 United States 7/18/2012 Dale Benjamin Campbell California 95008 United States 7/18/2012 samantha dauz san jose California 95148 United States 7/18/2012 William M Blalock Etowah North Carolina 28729 United States 7/18/2012 Raymond Rowe San Francisco California 94102 United States 7/18/2012 Liz Peddy Angwin California 94508 United States 7/18/2012 Mike Lipman San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Margaret McNelly San Jose Georgia 95135 United States 7/18/2012 Jed Keller Los Gatos California 95032-5761 United States 7/18/2012 Thomas Buss San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Julie Jones Boise Idaho 83709 United States 7/18/2012 Linda Ngo San Jose California 95121 United States 7/18/2012 Nathan Dobrenz San Jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Laurice Earl SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Jeffrey Earl SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Virginia D'Angelo San Jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Joyce Thomas San Mateo California 94401 United States 7/18/2012 John Goldberg Capitola California 95010 United States 7/18/2012 stephen rutledge campbell California 95008 United States 7/18/2012 Dorothy Strong Cupertino California 95014 United States 7/18/2012 Joan Petty San Jose California 95136 United States 7/18/2012 Anna Rutledge Campbell California 95008 United States 7/18/2012 Lars Bourne San Jose California 95111 United States 7/18/2012 michael Firenze san jose California 95118 United States 7/18/2012 Claire Myers Los Gatos California 95032-5509 United States 7/18/2012 rudolph maske san jose California 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Michael O'Halloran Santa Clara California 95050 United States 7/19/2012 Alan Carwile Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/19/2012 Margaret Rusher San Jose California 95135 San Marino 7/19/2012 jack tolvanen san jose California 95129 United States 7/19/2012 Charles Berls San Jose California 95118 United States 7/19/2012 Kevin Kurimoto San Jose California 95138 United States 7/19/2012 tim abney Santa clara California 95051 United States 7/19/2012 Alonzo Machiraju Ventura California 93003 United States 7/19/2012 MADELIENE SCHUMAN SAN JOSE California 95125 United States 7/19/2012 Thomas Webb Portland Oregon 97214 United States 7/19/2012 Michael Heinsohn 7/19/2012 Curt Lewis San Jose California 95123 United States 7/19/2012 Eugene Boden San Jose California 95124 United States 7/19/2012 John Kennedy Campbell California 95008 United States 7/19/2012 Larry arnold 7/19/2012 sid mcaulay 7/19/2012 Patricia Huttlinger San Jose California 95129 United States 7/19/2012 Kathy Styles Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 7/19/2012 cyndy johnston Sacramento California 95831 United States 7/19/2012 Suzan Rich San Jose California 95123 United States 7/19/2012 Meryl Woodson Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/19/2012 John Ballard San Jose California 95111 United States 7/19/2012 Jamie Moreland San Jose California 95117 United States 7/19/2012 Michael Steele Morrice Michigan 48857 United States 7/19/2012 JAMES SNYDER Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 7/19/2012 Joshua Diamond Alameda California 94501 United States 7/19/2012 Margaret Hardy San Jose California 95127 United States 7/19/2012 V SMITH 7/19/2012 Aaron Souza San Jose California 95123 United States 7/19/2012 Sandy McDonald San Jose California 95118 United States 7/19/2012 Susan Campbell San Jose California 95132-1920 United States 7/19/2012 Linh Vu Santa Clara California 95054 United States 7/19/2012 Allan Campbell San Jose California 95132 United States 7/19/2012 Tom Levenhagen Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/19/2012 Luan Vu Midway City California 92655 United States 7/19/2012 Douglas Green San Jose California 95136 United States 7/19/2012 Daniel Behn San Jose California 95119 United States 7/19/2012 Gina Sotelo San Jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Carrie Bayer Stroudsburg Pennsylvania 18360 United States 7/19/2012 William A.Flood Los Gatos California 95030-2317 United States 7/19/2012 Lee Eisenberg Portland Oregon 97239 United States 7/19/2012 Sue Gaumont San lose California 95123 United States 7/19/2012 Michael Wright San Jose California 95129 United States 7/19/2012 John Steely Medford Oregon 97504 United States 7/19/2012 Rosemary Dixon San Jose California 95126 United States 7/19/2012 larry arnold san jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Jeff Berman san jose California 95133 United States 7/19/2012 Dave venezio 7/19/2012 Francis Mccaskey San Jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Craig Spink 7/19/2012 Mary Ilisko San Jose California 95123 United States 7/19/2012 Mehrdaud Nik-Ahd San Jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Jay West San Jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Benay Sotelo San Jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Julie Guglielmo Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/19/2012 Mike Guglielmo Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/19/2012 Tom Monroe san jose California 95124 United States 7/19/2012 Tom Cotton San Jose California 95124 United States 7/19/2012 Daniel Gasper Newark California 94560 United States 7/19/2012 Dale Swanson San Jose California 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Howard Royer Pleasanton California 94588 United States 7/19/2012 peter gaudio san jose California 95138 United States 7/19/2012 Rob Johnson Saratoga California 95070 United States 7/20/2012 Kathleen Woods Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/20/2012 Candy Doss Stockton California 95209 United States 7/20/2012 sheryl stevens shoals Indiana 47581 United States 7/20/2012 Cynthia Towle an Jose California 95120 United States 7/20/2012 Ruby Verschoor San Jose California 95117 United States 7/20/2012 Ray Elliott los gatos California 95031 United States 7/20/2012 Rachelle Coronado El Cajon California 92020 United States 7/20/2012 James E Mello Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/21/2012 Kira Maximovich San Jose California 95120 United States 7/21/2012 Steven Spinola Mountain View California 94043 United States 7/21/2012 Maureen Jones San Jose California 95126 United States 7/21/2012 Mike McWilliams San lose California 95150 United States 7/21/2012 Jonathan Rigsby San Jose California 95123 United States 7/21/2012 Kristin Hess Langley Washington 98260 United States 7/21/2012 Greg Perrucci Los Gatos California 95030 United States 7/21/2012 greg severinghaus cupertino California 95015 United States 7/21/2012 Brian McDonald San Jose California 95118 United States 7/21/2012 Cathy&Bob Kauer Mountain View California 94040 United States 7/21/2012 Linda Ley San Jose California 95120 United States 7/22/2012 Daniel Burns San Jose California 95120 United States 7/22/2012 Larry Kells Palo Alto California 94303 United States 7/22/2012 Brad Fulton Campbell California 95008 United States 7/22/2012 Mary Burriesci San Jose California 95125 United States 7/22/2012 Barbara Lynch Jackson California 95642 United States 7/22/2012 suzi sellers Morgan Hill California 95037-4308 United States 7/23/2012 Gloria Pariseau morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/23/2012 Phyllis Farris Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/23/2012 Raquel Coto Buffalo New York 14226 United States 7/23/2012 Elaine Little San Jose California 95120 United States 7/23/2012 Tracy Jones San Jose California 95125 United States 7/23/2012 Charles Habib San Jose California 95128 United States 7/23/2012 kenny thome Ahwahnee California 93601 United States 7/23/2012 Carol meirhofer San jose California 95123 United States 7/23/2012 M Gangadharan Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/23/2012 May Goff San Jose California 95128 United States 7/23/2012 Katie Brown San Jose California 95120 United States 7/23/2012 Judy Busch Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/23/2012 lynn santos Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/23/2012 Julie zlatunich san jose California 95120 United States 7/23/2012 Angela D'Orfani Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/23/2012 Marcel Dubois San Jose California 95120 United States 7/23/2012 Wayne Van Gundy Gilroy California 95020 United(states 7/24/2012 Richard Heister Girardville Pennsylvania 17935 United States 7/24/2012 Mary Pope-Handy Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/24/2012 Michele Stawowy Los Gatos California 95032 United States 7/24/2012 michael stawowy los gatos California 95032 United States 7/24/2012 Eric goodwin Los Gatos California 95033 United States 7/24/2012 Tim Zadel San Jose California 95118 United States 7/25/2012 Julie Highline Federal Way Washington 98023 United States 7/25/2012 Robert duPreez San Jose California 95112 United States 7/25/2012 Bryan Williams Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 7/25/2012 Darrell Ingram San Jose California 95118 United States 7/25/2012 Joey Munoz San Jose California 95112 United States 7/25/2012 Lada Rosandich San Jose California 95125 United States 7/25/2012 Chris Dockendorf Raymond California 93653 United States 7/26/2012 kathleen lepow San Jose California 95125 United States 7/26/2012 Charles Lyons San Jose California 95120 United States 7/26/2012 William Gallo Los gatos California 95030 United States 7/26/2012 Desiree Mitchell San Jose California 95123 United States 7/26/2012 Kristopher Young Honolulu Hawaii 96818 United States 7/26/2012 Chad Francis San Jose California 95120 United States 7/26/2012 Eric Champlin San Jose California 95120 United States 7/26/2012 Matt McClendon San Jose California 95124 United States 7/26/2012 Amanda DeOcampo San Jose California 95123 United States 7/26/2012 Stefan campbell san jose California 95120 United States 7/26/2012 Rosalie Bainter Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 7/26/2012 Kristi Mercurio Gilroy California 95020 United States 7/27/2012 bill knight san jose California 95120 United States 7/28/2012 Elizabeth Frangadakis Monte Sereno California 95030 United States 7/29/2012 Scott Colbeck San Jose California 95124 United States 7/31/2012 Brett Becker Pacifica California 94044 United States 7/31/2012 Cheryl Dorman Santa Clara California 95051 United States 7/31/2012 Joel Becker SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 7/31/2012 Clark Young San Jose California 95124 United States 8/2/2012 Luke Reimer San Jose California 95125 United States 8/2/2012 Gil Pennington Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 8/2/2012 Leilani Arquelada San Jose California 95136 United States 8/2/2012 James Hoover Stockton California 95210 United States 8/2/2012 David Lee Manhattan Beach California 90266 United States 8/2/2012 Christine Crosno Elk Grove California 95624 United States 8/2/2012 Mike Baker Milpitas California 95035 United States 8/2/2012 Chris Rogusky Gardnerville Nevada 89460 United States 8/2/2012 Martin Sommerlandt San Jose California 95136 United States 8/2/2012 Dan Fitzpatrick Mountain View California 94043 United States 8/2/2012 Victor Kwong San Jose California 95120 United States 8/2/2012 Amy Cho San Jose California 95148 United States 8/2/2012 Veronica Chiu San Jose California 95129 United States 8/2/2012 Curtis Hurd San Jose California 95123 United States 8/2/2012 Lynn Dietz Campbell California 95008 United States 8/2/2012 Al Leitch San Jose California 95130 United States 8/2/2012 Tyrone Yu San Jose California 95136 United States 8/2/2012 victor klee san jose California 95148 United States 8/2/2012 Brian Winter San Jose California 95126 United States 8/2/2012 David Mouser Los Gatos California 95032 United States 8/2/2012 Marcel Holle San Jose California 95136 United States 8/2/2012 kathy Aspinwall Campbell California 95008 United States 8/2/2012 L Ooi San Jose California 95120 United States 8/2/2012 Roy Thomassen atascadero California 93423 United States 8/2/2012 KEVIN SEWARD EMERALD HILLS California 94062 United States 8/2/2012 Bryan Lelli San Jose California 95118 United States 8/2/2012 Tom Hudson San Jose California 95118 United States 8/2/2012 Michael Underwood San Jose California 95123 United States 8/2/2012 Don Robling San Jose California 95124 United States 8/2/2012 Mike Eldridge Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 8/2/2012 Kirstin Chan San Jose California 95111 United States 8/2/2012 Frank Henderson san jose California 95123 United States 8/2/2012 Sean Weitzel San Jose California 95124 United States 8/3/2012 Tom Workman San lose California 95125 United States 8/3/2012 Jeff Okubo Los Gatos California 95030 United States 8/3/2012 Katie Clinton San Jose California 95123 United States 8/3/2012 Sean Penello San Jose California 95148 United States 8/3/2012 Tod Weitzel Santa Clara California 95050 United States 8/3/2012 Peter Chastain San Jose California 95126 United States 8/3/2012 Manuel Gerstner Munchen 80337 Germany 8/3/2012 Jim Flanegin Santa Clara California 95050 United States 8/3/2012 Angie Rhodes Elk Grove California 95757 United States 8/3/2012 Erick McCarthy Union City California 94587 United States 8/3/2012 Lisa Press San Jose California 95120 United States 8/3/2012 A Perez San Jose California 95112 United States 8/3/2012 Jeffrey Huber Campbell California 95008 United States 8/3/2012 Jim ONeill San Jose California 95118 United States 8/3/2012 Alexander Stojanovic Los Gatos California 95030 United States 8/3/2012 A.D.Lehane Santa Clara California 95050 United States 8/3/2012 Greg Lanctot Los Gatos California 95032 United States 8/3/2012 Ray Savellano Santa Clara California 95051 United States 8/3/2012 Gary Likhatchev San lose California 95124 United States 8/3/2012 Roy Ledochowski San Jose California 95111 United States 8/4/2012 Charles Schenck San Jose California 95118 United States 8/4/2012 Amy Marseline Gilroy California 95020 United States 8/4/2012 Daniel Evanich San Jose California 95123 United States 8/4/2012 Larry Herdman San Jose California 95123-4849 United States 8/4/2012 James Whitaker Santa Clara California 95050 United States 8/4/2012 Alex Gallipeau Redondo Beach California 90278 United States 8/5/2012 Gary Ater Santa Clara California 95050 United States 8/5/2012 Jeffrey Orum Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 8/5/2012 jim willson san jose California 95124 United States 8/5/2012 Dick Stephan Sunyvale California 94087 United States 8/5/2012 James Enloe Sunnyvale California 94086 United States 8/5/2012 James Watson San Jose California 95122-3802 United hates 8/5/2012 William Furniss San Jose California 95120 United States 8/5/2012 William Palley San Jose California 95125 United States 8/5/2012 ROBERTO GONZALEZ SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 8/5/2012 John Goldsborough Los Altos California 94022 United States 8/5/2012 Tom Murtha San Jose California 95120 United States 8/5/2012 Fred Meyer San Jose California 95120 United States 8/5/2012 Alice Meyer San Jsoe California 95120 United States 8/5/2012 Stephen Rowe San Jose California 95136 United States 8/5/2012 Paul Ungaro coyote California 95013 United States 8/5/2012 Allison Kenneally Santa Clara California 95054 United States 8/5/2012 Susan monahan santa clara California 95054 United States 8/5/2012 Lawrence Mangan San Jose California 95136 United States 8/5/2012 Gianni Falco San Jose California 95123 United States 8/5/2012 Kay Banchero San Jose California 95120 United States 8/5/2012 Brendan Dolan San Jose California 95118 United States 8/6/2012 Arieh Strod Cupertino California 95014 United States 8/6/2012 Willaim Brooks San Jose California 95126 United States 8/6/2012 Steve Cheney Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 8/6/2012 Alex Seroff Los Gatos California 95033 United States 8/6/2012 Kathy Murphy Los Gatos California 95030 United States 8/6/2012 Charles Hayden Sparks Nevada 89434 United States 8/6/2012 Sumo Killfoil San Jose California 95120 United States 8/6/2012 Kim stilwill cherryville North Carolina 28021 United States 8/6/2012 Warren Volk Campbell California 95008 United States 8/6/2012 Andrea Watson Concord, North Carolina 28025 United States 8/6/2012 Cameron Worsham San Jose California 95118 United States 8/6/2012 C Phillips San Jose California 95120 United States 8/6/2012 Jeff Hopkins Los Gatos California 95032 United States 8/6/2012 George Dyer campbell California 95008 United States 8/6/2012 Mark Macevicz San Jose California 95120 United States 8/6/2012 Mark Otto San Jose California 95120 United States 8/7/2012 Sharyn Evanich San Jose California 95123 United States 8/7/2012 Rodd Abad Las Vegas Nevada 89108 United States 8/7/2012 Megan Emery Berkeley California 94705 United States 8/7/2012 Joann Cruz san jose California 95117 United States 8/7/2012 Dane Westen Los Gatos California 95030 United States 8/7/2012 Jeff Conner San Jose California 95118 United States 8/7/2012 Dan Garcia Azusa California 91702 United States 8/7/2012 Eleanor Beard San Jose California 95135 United States 8/7/2012 Donald Rosenbaum Cupertino California 95014 United States 8/7/2012 Susan Blake Campbell California 95008 United States 8/8/2012 Margaret Yost San Jose Colorado 95120 United States 8/8/2012 Michael Cox Soquel California 95073 United States 8/8/2012 Peter Cook San Jose California 95124 United States 8/8/2012 Jill B San Jose California 95118 United States 8/9/2012 Steven Goldammer San Jose California 95131 United States 8/9/2012 Jon Field Campbell California 95008 United States 8/9/2012 David Lomasney Campbell California 95008 United States 8/9/2012 Valerie Manfull Anchorage Alaska 99504 United States 8/9/2012 Ron Tragni Antioch California 94509 United States 8/9/2012 Patricia Giles San Jose California 95148 United States 8/10/2012 Mike Vanneman Bend Oregon 97702 United States 8/10/2012 michael thompson morgan hill California 95037 United States 8/11/2012 Jim Kohl San Jose California 95112 United States 8/11/2012 John Byram San Jose California 95120 United States 8/11/2012 Larry Fogelquist Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 8/11/2012 Mike Cardoza San Jose California 95118-3460 United States 8/11/2012 Ryan Smith San Jose California 95112 United States 8/11/2012 Frank Magarelli San Jose California 95119 United States 8/11/2012 Douglas Ely Los Alamitos California 90720 United States 8/11/2012 Rocky Nguyen San Jose California 95112 United States 8/11/2012 Margaret Magill Saratoga California 95070 United States 8/12/2012 Ryan Mockabee San Jose California 95120 United States 8/12/2012 Daniel Martinez san francisco California 94122 United States 8/12/2012 Tuan Mai San Jose California 95123 United States 8/12/2012 Mark Haney San Jose California 95112 United States 8/12/2012 Spider Pot Saratoga California 95070 United States 8/12/2012 Ben Wintle San Jose California 95110 United States 8/13/2012 Lynn Suckow Walla Walla Washington 99362 United States 8/13/2012 Tony Lima colorado springs Colorado 80909 United States 8/13/2012 Micael Emery Los Gatos California 95032 United States 8/13/2012 J Jackson Santa Clara California 95050 United States 8/13/2012 Jon Villarreal San Jose California 95124 United States 8/13/2012 Andrew Parham Henderson Nevada 89011 United States 8/13/2012 CAROL WASHINGTON SAN JOSE California 95111 United States 8/14/2012 DENNIS ANTONETTI San Jose California 95112 United States 8/14/2012 Rena Gooding San lose California 95118 United States 8/14/2012 Jim Sleigh San Jose California 95125 United States 8/15/2012 David Laws Pacific Grove California 93950 United States 8/15/2012 Phillip Rossignol San Jose California 95125 United States 8/15/2012 Robert Edwards San Jose California 95124-4915 United States 8/17/2012 Charles Aftosmis East Falmouth Massachusetts 2536 United States 8/17/2012 Michael Aftosmis Foster City California 94404 United States 8/17/2012 Michael Boulland San Jose, California 95120 United States 8/17/2012 Charlotte Khandelwal Los Gatos California 95033 United States 8/17/2012 Stephen wyckoff soquel California 95073 United States 8/17/2012 Charles Nehring San Jose California 95120 United States 8/18/2012 Rod Garcia Gilbert Arizona 85233 United States 8/20/2012 Brian Hess San Jose California 95112 United States 8/20/2012 Karen Sproul Michener Lititz Pennsylvania 17543 United States 8/20/2012 Larry Anderson Fortuna California 95540 United States 8/20/2012 Shalini Trehan San Jose California 95120 United States 8/21/2012 Chuck Sunder MN Minnesota 55416 United States 8/21/2012 James Pennington Crestview Florida 32539 United States 8/22/2012 John Freeman Florence Alabama 35633 United States 8/23/2012 Charles W Fitzgerald Texarkana Arkansas 71854 United States 8/23/2012 Ken Taylor Colorado Springs Colorado 80911 United States 8/23/2012 Alvin Zimmermann Wyncote Pennsylvania 19095-1304 United States 8/23/2012 Charles E.Grant Wetumpka Alabama 36093 United States 8/23/2012 Joseph Scanlan San Jose California 95136 United States 8/23/2012 Roy Killion Green Forest Arkansas 72638 United States 8/24/2012 Kenneth Vahrenkamp Allen Texas 75002 United States 8/24/2012 Jon Meador Fresno California 93727 United States 8/24/2012 John Falk Bella Vista California 96008 United States 8/25/2012 John Kaniaupio Kaneohe Hawaii 96744 United States 8/25/2012 Craig Jones Hayward California 94544 United States 8/26/2012 Matt Foreman Lincoln Nebraska 68542-2062 United States 8/27/2012 Michael Cosyn San Jose California 95124 United States 8/29/2012 Terri Rader San Jose California 95112 United States 8/31/2012 Sheba Dalaney San Jose California 95124 United States 8/31/2012 Linda Houston San Jose California 95117 United States 9/5/2012 Richard McCoy San Jose California 95130 United States 9/5/2012 Michael Allen San Jose California 95126 United States 9/5/2012 Kenichi Okuno Los Gatos California 95033 United States 9/5/2012 First Perry Ropp Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/6/2012 Darin Madden Tracy California 95376 United States 9/8/2012 Jorj Tilson San Jose California 95126 United States 9/8/2012 Tim Mitchell San Jose California 95518 United States 9/10/2012 Kevin Haley San Jose California 95110 United States 9/10/2012 JULIAN KARDAS GRAHAM Washington 98338-0851 United States 9/11/2012 Gail Birgers Cupertino California 95014 United States 9/12/2012 Andrea Thomas Fresno California 93705 United States 9/12/2012 Bryce Hampton Cupertino California 95014 United States 9/12/2012 Mark Williams San Jose California 95123-1440 United States 9/12/2012 JERRY PATRIGNANI SAN JOSE California 95118 United States 9/12/2012 deborah welch brookdale California 950070201 United States 9/13/2012 Michael Keating Las Vegas Nevada 89123 United States 9/13/2012 Dyan Garcia Milton Florida 32583 United States 9/13/2012 Chris Kilduff Kalamazoo Michigan 49001 United States 9/14/2012 Jill Dumont Sun Valley Nevada 89433 United States 9/14/2012 Dominique trujillo San Jose California 95111 United States 9/14/2012 Kristen Stormes Oak Harbor Washington 98277 United States 9/14/2012 Carol Lazetera Manteca California 95336 United States 9/14/2012 Holly Beth Cadiente San Jose California 95112 United States 9/14/2012 Beth Casale San Jose California 95123 United States 9/14/2012 anthony perry Irvine California 95059 United States 9/14/2012 mark schroeder San Jose California 95112 United States 9/14/2012 Darrin Lopez Cottage Grove Oregon 97424 United States 9/14/2012 Jonathan Marinaro Santa Clara California 95050 United States 9/14/2012 Cordell Kintner San Jose California 95122 United States 9/14/2012 Mitsue Farnsworth El Cerrito California 94530 United States 9/14/2012 Jana Pierce San Jose California 95140 United States 9/14/2012 Clare Gordon San Jose California 95124 United States 9/14/2012 Hugo Bettencourt San Jose California 95148 United States 9/14/2012 Pat Wagstaff San Jose California 95119 United States 9/14/2012 kathryn lesser san jose California 95121 United States 9/14/2012 Lauren Sanchez San Jose California 95118 United States 9/17/2012 Anne Fields San Jose California 95118 United States 9/18/2012 Christine Gibbins San Jose California 95125 United States 9/18/2012 Deborah Nichols San Jose California 95128 United States 9/19/2012 Elizabeth Whamond San Jose California 95112 United States 9/19/2012 Eric Serdahl Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 9/20/2012 Peter Tommerup Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/20/2012 Hal Wilson Taylorsville Utah 84129-6004 United States 9/20/2012 Mary Humphrey Gilroy California 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Joseph Buckle San Jose California 95111 United States 9/21/2012 Madeline Lynch San Francisco California 94109 United States 9/21/2012 ROBERT MANG Gilroy California 95021 United States 9/21/2012 JOAN BUCKLEY GILROY California 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Dushan Gasich San Jose California 95120 United States 9/21/2012 Rich Rohme Watsonville California 95076 United States 9/22/2012 elisa trimble Broken Arrow Oklahoma 74012 United States 9/22/2012 Frederick Berger San Jose California 95120 United States 9/23/2012 Carl Wang San Jose California 95118 United States 9/23/2012 Joe Navratil San Jose California 95118 United States 9/24/2012 Cass Kalinski San Jose California 95128 United States 9/24/2012 Brad Gyger Los Gatos California 95032-4026 United States 9/24/2012 shedy berrios jacksonville nc North Carolina 28540 United States 9/24/2012 Daniel Buszkiewicz San Jose California 95136 United States 9/24/2012 Diane Main San Jose California 95125 United States 9/24/2012 Larry McColloch Santa Clara California 95054 United States 9/24/2012 Tim Jordan San Jose California 95120 United States 9/24/2012 Lance Kuempel Livermore California 94550 United States 9/24/2012 Ken Helwig Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 9/24/2012 Vic Balagot San Jose California 95148 United 6tates 9/24/2012 Mark Lyons San Jose California 95136 United States 9/24/2012 Tom Pecota St Helena California 94574 United States 9/24/2012 Scott Johnson San Jose California 95124 United States 9/24/2012 Craig Jones Hayward California 94544 United States 9/24/2012 Doug Blasco Livermore California 94551 United States 9/24/2012 Jarda Skyba San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 George Leavell San Jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Bob Hedgpeth Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 9/25/2012 Martin Knutson Los Gatos California 95033 United States 9/25/2012 Eric Bohl Capitola California 95010 United States 9/25/2012 Rachel C Fresno California 93630 United States 9/25/2012 Julie Hall San Jose California 95129 United States 9/25/2012 Shelley Berger San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Joseph Kerley anchorage Alaska 99504 United States 9/25/2012 Richard Ornellas San jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Michael O'Halloran Santa Clara California 95050 United States 9/25/2012 Marcy Nunes San Jose California 95124 United States 9/25/2012 Thomas Stroebel San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Brenda Swiney San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Bob Peterson San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Karen Friedrichs San Jose California 95129 United States 9/25/2012 Theodore Olson San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Terry Johnson Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/25/2012 Earl Stutes San Jose California 95124 United States 9/25/2012 Brendan Ryan San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Charles Smith San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Marion MacKinnon Cupertino California 95014 United States 9/25/2012 Todd Haney San Jose California 95118 United States 9/25/2012 Amina Atique San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Steve Larson San lose 95136 Senegal 9/25/2012 Bill Shoenhair San Jose California 95128 United States 9/25/2012 Arthur Blackwell Evergreen Colorado United States 9/25/2012 Marion Farber San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Ron Dorsey Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 9/25/2012 Dave Ganser Pleasanton California 94588 United States 9/25/2012 DAN MCFARLAND san jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Jack Longley Los Gatos California 95030-4340 United States 9/25/2012 IRMA LONGLEY Los Gatos California 95030 United States 9/25/2012 Nathan Cook Campbell California 95008 United States 9/25/2012 Herb Mesler San Carlos California 94070 United States 9/25/2012 John Dannenberg San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Andrew Hyslop Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/25/2012 steve hein San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Susan Clark San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 judi kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Shelly Best San Jose California 95118 United States 9/25/2012 Jodi DeWitt Seattle Washington 98101 United States 9/25/2012 Uly vonHuene San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 sandra cannizzaro san jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Denise Bruno San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 John Nast Gilroy California 95020 United States 9/25/2012 Maryrose Hutchinson San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Drew Marsh San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Sharon Lum San Jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Marcy Battaglia Los Gatos California 95030 United States 9/25/2012 Katherine Bussey Fayetteville North Carolina 28306 United States 9/25/2012 vernon hyde san jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 James Owen San Jose California 95124 United States 9/25/2012 John Dvorak San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Karen Buesing Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/25/2012 Bobby Moorhatch San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Susan Johnson Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/25/2012 Amber McDonald Fair Oaks California 95628 United States 9/25/2012 Christina La Oberhauser San Jose California 95133 United States 9/25/2012 Richard Kegley San Jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Kimberly Wood San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Cissy Brazil San Jose California 95123 United States 9/26/2012 Julie Kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 Jacob Finkle Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Pat Tapley Cupertinp California 95014 United States 9/26/2012 Ed Von Runnen San Jose California 95119 United States 9/26/2012 Charlie bogen Junction City Kansas 66441 United States 9/26/2012 Jon Field San Nose California 95118 United States 9/26/2012 Gregory Farris San Jose California 95123 United States 9/26/2012 Jeanne Dittman San Jose California 95132 United States 9/26/2012 Gary Fischer San Jose California 95124 United States 9/26/2012 Carol Treat Post Falls Idaho 93954 United States 9/26/2012 Steve Sawyer Menlo Park California 94025 United States 9/26/2012 David Evans Santa Cruz California 95060 United States 9/26/2012 Larry Przywara Mountain View California 94040 United States 9/26/2012 Howard Cohen Palo Alto California 94306 United States 9/26/2012 Brian Kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 Ken Parsons Milpitas California 95035 United States 9/26/2012 Martin Junkar San Jose California 95118 United States 9/26/2012 Lisa Hettler-Smith San Jose California 95112 United States 9/26/2012 Allan Hamilton San Jose California 95120-4568 United States 9/26/2012 Jim Russell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Don DeHart San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 John OKeefe San Jose California 95124 United States 9/26/2012 Christine Russell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Matt Wheeler Los Altos California 94024 United States 9/26/2012 Kristin Khanna Ponte Vedra Beach Florida 32082 United States 9/26/2012 John Havens Windsor California 95492 United States 9/26/2012 Joel Gartland Palo Alto California 94303 United States 9/26/2012 madeline wollbrinck san jose California 95124 United States 9/26/2012 Maryke Williams San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 Ruth Hewson Magnolia Texas 77355 United States 9/26/2012 andrea morton San lose California 95118 United States 9/26/2012 Tom Wight San Jose California 95111 United States 9/27/2012 Carol Zuvella Milpitas California 95035-6510 United States 9/27/2012 Mae Lin Bishop San Jose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 nikki morton San Jose California 95118 United States 9/27/2012 Toh-Bee Syn San Jose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Kathleen Norman Pendleton Oregon 97801 United States 9/27/2012 Elizabeth Christenson Greenbrae California 94904 United States 9/27/2012 Genevieve Haney San lose California 95112 United States 9/27/2012 Robert Dietrich Richmond California 94801 United States 9/27/2012 Judi Souza San Jose California 95125 United States 9/27/2012 Ellen Roy San Jose California 95129 United States 9/27/2012 Gaye McClure Twin Falls Idaho 83301 United States 9/27/2012 Regina Syn SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Erin Kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Omar Villarreal Gilroy California 95020 United States 9/27/2012 Heather Murray San Jose California 95124 United States 9/27/2012 osvaldo cadena san jose California 95112 United States 9/27/2012 Sandy&Brian Serpa San Jose California 95123 United States 9/27/2012 Jeff Singewald Mountain View California 94040 United States 9/27/2012 Michaela Baker San Jose California 95124 United States 9/27/2012 JIM DONEGAN Sa nJose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 LORETTA DEAGEN Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/28/2012 Rob Lion Redwood City California 94062-3105 United States 9/28/2012 Thomas Mangano Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/28/2012 James Shaw San Jose California 95123 United States 9/28/2012 Kendra Hershey Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/28/2012 Greg Azevedo San Jose California 95124 United States 9/28/2012 Sandra clark Fremont California 94539 United States 9/28/2012 Larry Bursch San Jose California 95125-5043 United States 9/28/2012 Ann Leever San Jose California 95125 United States 9/28/2012 Michael Hazarian San Jose California 95125 United States 9/28/2012 Daniel Biesterveld San Jose California 95125 United States 9/28/2012 Ken Miller San Jose California 95125-3341 United States 9/29/2012 Alison Pangburn San Jose California 95125 United States 9/29/2012 1 Dave Reinoehl m Ca pbell California 95008 United States 9J29/2012 Rajwinder Kaur Fremont California 94536 United States 9/29/2012 Douglas Miller Portland Oregon 97213 United States 9/29/2012 Tabitha Evans San Jose California 95120 United States 9/29/2012 Grace Li Mountain View California 94043 United States 9/29/2012 matt black Oakland California 94610 United States 9/29/2012 Matt Wales San Jose California 95132 United States 9/29/2012 Loureen Giordano San Jose California 95110 United States 9/30/2012 Hans and Diane Ernst Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/30/2012 Sharon Fiekowsky Los Altos California 94024 United States 9/30/2012 Neal Weinstein San Jose California 95120 United States 9/30/2012 Joseph Hennequin Boise Idaho 83709 United States 10/1/2012 William Storck San Jose California 95130 United States 10/1/2012 Cathy Baird San Carlos California 94070 United States 10/1/2012 Tony Leaman San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 gail gitt campbell California 95008 United States 10/2/2012 Stephanie Leaman San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 Diane Leaman San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 John Rowell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 10/2/2012 Dan Summers San Jose California 95118 United States 10/2/2012 Rachel Ramirez San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 jamy tays brentwood California 94513 United States 10/3/2012 SALVADORE SERIO SAN JOSE California 95118 United States 10/3/2012 William Allfrey San Jose California 95118 United States 10/3/2012 Katie Fong Taipei 11151 Taiwan 10/4/2012 Julie Anne San Jose California 95120 United States 10/4/2012 Jojan Antony San Jose California 95119 United States 10/4/2012 joshy varghese san jose California 95119 United States 10/4/2012 Carmen Sanders San Jose California 95130 United States 10/4/2012 Piers Sutton Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 10/4/2012 David Hicks Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 10/5/2012 Gregory Hobbs Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 10/6/2012 Andy Hamilton San Jose California 95120 United States 10/6/2012 Aaron Andrade San Jose California 95136 United States 10/6/2012 Julian Gomez Palo Alto California 94303 United States 10/6/2012 Marie Bombardier San Marcos California 92078 United States 10/7/2012 Vladimir Gorshkov San Jose California 95120 United States 10/7/2012 Scott Lesch San Jose California 95112 United States 10/7/2012 Paul Fahey Campbell California 95008 United States 10/8/2012 Kathleen Fahey Campbell California 95008 United States 10/8/2012 Michael Bena San Jose California 95136 United States 10/8/2012 John Hanhauser San Jose California 95123 United States 10/8/2012 Sharon Nienhaus Santa Clara California 95051 United States 10/9/2012 Steve Sandel Oakland California 94601 United States 10/11/2012 Sharon Cunigan Napa California 94559 United States 10/11/2012 Bernice Luis san jose California 95128 United States 10/11/2012 Mark Mangin San Jose California 95120 United States 10/11/2012 dick marin superior Colorado 80027 United States 10/11/2012 Phillip Knox Los Angeles California 91392 United States 10/11/2012 joel cohn seattle Washington 98136 United States 10/11/2012 ALLEN MILLER SACRAMENTO California 95816 United States 10/11/2012 Luke Hurd San Jose California 95128 United States 10/11/2012 Scott Procker San Jose California 95120 United States 10/11/2012 Bruce Taylor Belgrade Montana 59714 United States 10/11/2012 Ryan Berbick San Jose California 95148 United States 10/12/2012 Harry Larrabee Sr Ellsworth Maine 4605 United States 10/12/2012 Kenneth Blum Hillpoint Wisconsin 53937 United States 10/12/2012 Elliot Scozzola San Jose California 95148 United States 10/12/2012 Cloyd Laughlin Lake Charles Louisiana 70601 United States 10/12/2012 Donna Slack Oregon City Oregon 97045 United States 10/12/2012 Chris Matthiessen San jose California 95124 United States 10/12/2012 Russell Rockett Mountain View California 94040 United States 10/12/2012 Rene Rodriguez San Jose California 95128 United States 10/12/2012 Jackie VerHulst San Jose California 95123 United States 10/12/2012 Trevor Schwartz Los Gatos California 95030 United States 10/12/2012 Jeffrey McClanahan Los Gatos California 95032 United States 10/12/2012 Chris Sulek San Jose California 95126 United States 10/12/2012 Anthony Misch San Jose California 95125 United States 10/12/2012 Greg Lynn San Jose California 95125 United States 1O/12/2012 Jody Berbick San Jose California 95148 United States 10/13/2012 Paul Ambrosini San Jose California 95148 United States 10/13/2012 Weijing Lin San Jose California 95112 United States 10/13/2012 Robert Leibbrand San Jose California 95112 United States 10/13/2012 Julie oderio San Jose California 95120 United States 10/13/2012 Gloria Gill San Jose California 95120 United States 10/13/2012 Cathy Martin Alviso California 95002 United States 10/13/2012 cathleen reno San Jose California 95112 United States 10/13/2012 Kim McKelvey San Jose California 95138 United States 10/13/2012 Wanda O'Kelly Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 10/13/2012 Gordon johnson Santa Cruz California 95060 United States 10/14/2012 Angeline King Mountain View California 94040 United States 10/14/2012 011ie Moore Jr San Jose California 95111 United States 10/14/2012 Christie Gurney San Jose California 95139 United States 10/14/2012 Jill P Bohn San Jose California 95127 United States 10/14/2012 Brian Gurney San Jose California 95139 United States 10/14/2012 Rachel G. San Jose California 95136 United States 10/14/2012 Jeffrey Cianci San Jose California 95119 United States 10/14/2012 Travis Watkins San Jose California 95123 United States 10/15/2012 Rachel Ellam San lose California 95135 United States 10/15/2012 Michael Lambert San Jose California 95120 United States 10/15/2012 Paul Teogalbo San Jose California 95125 United States 10/15/2012 Enrique Navarro-Donnellan Morgan Hill California 95037 United States 10/15/2012 I Nishant Singh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15213 United States 10/15/2012 Robert Clarke San Jose California 95136 United States 10/15/2012 Laurel Lawrence San Jose California 95120 United States 10/15/2012 Craig Peasley Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 10/15/2012 Deborah Licata San Jose California 95123 United States 10/15/2012 Christian Malaspina East Palo Alto California 94303 United States 10/15/2012 Deanna Jacoby San Jose California 95118 United States 10/15/2012 Dustin Clark San Jose California 95127 United States 10/15/2012 deanna brazys morgan hill California 95037 United States 10/15/2012 Federico Galli Los Gatos California 95030 United States 10/16/2012 Sherri Bohan San Jose California 95124 United States 10/16/2012 Rudolph Cruz San Jose California 95129 United States 10/16/2012 Robert Williams Portsmouth Virginia 23701 United States 10/16/2012 Darren Larkin Santa Cruz California 95062 United States 10/16/2012 doug morgan san jose California 95128 United States 10/16/2012 Patrick Nolan Los Gatos California 95033 United States 10/16/2012 Curt Dunn San Jose California 95125 United States 10/16/2012 Gretchen Weidenbach San Jose California 95129 United States 10/16/2012 Silvana Ladewig San Jose California 95124 United States 10/16/2012 David Sowards-Emmerd San Jose California 95124 United States 10/17/2012 Kirsten Osorio San Jose California 95120 United States 10/17/2012 Angelina Delos Reyes Walnut Creek California 94595 United States 10/17/2012 Anisa Joseph San Jose California 95120 United States 10/17/2012 Glenda Lucas San Jose California 95120 United States 10/17/2012 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment The tower reminds me of the people stationed there to protect the US from attack. It is an Jordan Makower Sunnyvale CA 94085 United States 6/12/2012 already-built monument! The radar tower is a part of history, a "castle" of the cold war. It has fascinated me from the first day that I arrived in Silicon Valley. I would be disappointed to see it torn down. Please Paul McWilliams San Jose CA 95138 United States 6/12/2012 save the tower! The"Cube" is a landmark of local history that deserves to keep its place of prominence-it's also a ready-made viewing platform and interpretive center for the mountaintop. Keep the William Foley Brighton MA 2135 United States 6/12/2012 tower! I am a veteran of The Almaden AFS. W lived on the mountain from 1966 to 1968. The service performed by the veterans of AAFS need to be remembered and honored. Bill Conway Billings MT 59102 United States 6/13/2012 Bill Conway This radar tower is history;a monument to the Cold War. If we don't work together to save Ron Dootson United States 6/13/2012 the few that are left,we'll wake up one morning wondering what happened. Darlene White Fairfield CA 94534 United States 6/13/2012 It's a memory from my childhood growing up in Almaden. The Almaden AFS AN/FPS-24 tower is one of the few(maybe only) mountaintop tower remaining in existance. It should be preserved as a monument to those of us that served to defend the United States and Canada from attack during the cold war. I fondly remember my service in the USAF Air Defense Command in California in the 1950-1960's and would be Martin Nielson SE.Albaquerque NM 85282 United States 6/13/2012 disappointed to see this land mark destroyed as was done at Mt Hebo,Oregon. Jim Ault MESA AZ 85205 United States 6/13/2012 1 am a veteran of Almaden AFS and worked in the radar tower. The tower is a reminder of how we need to be prepared. I often saw the radar working and George Royer Los Gatos CA 95032-3572 United States 6/13/2012 had to design an IBM product to avoid interference from the radar sweep. As a former Air Force Radar Operator and Cold War vetern I feel that facilities such as this Tim Peters Miami FL 33157 United States 6/13/2012 need to be retained as a reminder of what was and what still coud be. The Almaden AFS radar tower is a constant reminder to me that"Freedom Isn't Cheap".To demolish the tower means the 27 months, of my youth, I spent manning that radar was Bob Watts Morgan Hill CA 95038 United States 6/13/2012 "Thanks but no thanks". i I The radar tower did its job. It's probably the best symbol up there or even in the Bay Area of a time we can hardly imagine,when our parents/grandparent's defended the country, Gail Klein Stanford CA 94305 United States 6/13/2012 just 75 years ago. The tower is a reminder of growing up here in the valley. It is a significant piece of our Wayne Jueal San Jose CA 95130 United States 6/13/2012 history and should be saved for future generations to enjoy. Charles Jeronimo Livermore CA 94550-4224 United States 6/13/2012 1 served there for 18 months and appreciated the beauty of that mountain. I moved to San Jose in 1964 when stationed at Almaden AFS. I was transfered in 1966, but moved back in 1967. 1 lived there until) I retired in 2010.The tower was always the landmark that I saw that meant I was"home". It has always been an attraction to the people living in Bruce Mann Corning CA 96021 United States 6/13/2012 the valley. It's part of our history and should be preserved, like Hangar One at Moffett Field. I retired from the Air Force and served at Moffett Field. Our military history should be preserved, Penelope Cole Santa Clara CA 95051 United States 6/13/2012 lest we forget how to fight for freedom. The radar tower is a monument to the successful completion of the cold war. Future generations need to know the danger this country was exposed to and how we were Robert Zenorini Demarest NJ 7627 United States 6/13/2012 protected from enemy attack. Not only is this building recognized as a local landmark, but is it also an important piece of Lisa Penney Belmont CA 94002 United States 6/13/2012 american history. Our "Cold War History" needs to be preserved. Not too many sites have been saved for future generations.You should be proud to have these landmarks left and should be preserved.You could open them as a local museum and make it a tourist attraction. I am Kent Pillatsch Wentzville MO 63385 United States 6/13/2012 sure you would find volunteers to operate a venture like that. During the Cold War I was stationed at Mt Hebo AFS, OR. We had the same radar and a similar radar tower of the same size on a 3154 ft tall mountain. The radar station at Mt Hebo and its' radar tower has been torn down and all that is left is a plaque less than 2 ft Stephen Weatherly Wellesley Island NY 13640 United States 6/13/2012 square. Do I have regret-absolutely! During the Cold War I was stationed at Mt Hebo AFS,OR. We had the same radar and a similar tower of the same size on a 3154 ft mountain. It was torn down and nothing is left of Stephen Weatherly Wellesley Island NY 13640 United States 6/13/2012 the old radar station on Mt Hebo. Do I have regret-absolutely! Being both born and raised in San Jose and being stationed there in the USAF it is part of Richard Welsh Sacramento CA 95821 United States 6/13/2012 the valley history Edward Hobbs TOLEDO OH 43615 United States 6/13/2012 1 WAS STATIONED THERE FOR 4 YEARS IN THE EARLY SIXTIES. I I _ 1 I was stationed at Almaden AFS from 1970-71. Upon my discharge from active service in 1972 1 worked in the Silicon Valley for various electronic firms and in support of the defense industry in 'fighting'the cold war. Almaden AFS wa a constant VISUAL reminder of why we were doing our jobs. Today it serves as a GREAT reminder of that time period AND is proof that the vigilance we provided prevented an unthinkable third world war. Please keep an Gary Coffland Sonoma CA 95476 United States 6/13/2012 important piece of history alive for our future generations. This is an historic building--there were very few of them built and most have already been David Casteel Dallas TX 75243 United States 6/13/2012 destroyed. Native of San Jose, served in radar career field in USAF. Can see tower from parent's front John Pundsack Midwest City_ OK 73130 United States 6/14/2012 yard. Small part of history._ Should be a reminder to all the times of the past. Ojigalak Kanaw Campbell CA 95011 United States 6/14/2012 Save the tower! Mark Johnson San Jose CA 95124 United States 6/14/2012 It's historically significant I never worked on or received any training on the FPS-24 but 1 can't believe how many sites there used to be but how few are left. If any can be saved, it will be a plus for future generations to see what we went through in our day. I know some day we will have to fight SSgt. Mark Arnett Albuquerque NM 87120 United States 6/14/2012 to preserve the FPS-66 out on the mesa. Preserve our history! to retain the FPS-24 tower as a memorial to the men and women who served our country, Kenneth Wilson Panama City FL 32405-3909 United States 6/14/2012 protecting them during the "Cold War".Yes, I too served there '69-72 The radar tower is a historical landmark. It was a major part of our defense during my childhood.The Santa Clara Valley will never the the same if the building is torn down. GARY SCHRECK OKEECHOBEE FL 34973-2441 United States 6/14/2012 P.S. Isn't there some way that it can be put to use-maybe as a museum? It has been a fixture of our skyline for decades and represents many things to many people. Curtis Hoppins Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 6/14/2012 It's part of our history and must be saved. Please have a little regard for the history that took place and the men who served there. Marjory Zenorini Demarest NJ 7627 United States 6/14/2012 Thanks MZ I strongly support keeping the radar tower that stands on top of Mount Umunhum. My father is a veteran who was stationed at Almeden Airforce Station. Our whole family is very proud of the work that he did there and extremely interested in the history that took place on this beautiful location. I think it is very important that we don't forget what happened here and keeping the radar tower standing tall will make sure to keep it prominent in our Carissa Hobbs San Jose CA 95117 United States 6/14/2012 minds. Ernest Hall Salinas CA 93907 United States 6/14/2012 Was stationed there from 1976- 1978. Linna Harnack Sunnyvale CA 94086 United States 6/15/2012 For its historic significance and to honor/remember the people who worked or served there. was never stationed at a fixed radar site in the states but I was stationed at several in PACAF. These old sites are part of our history from the Cold War years and should be Raymond Buda West Union OH 45693 United States 6/15/2012 preserved for future generations. It is such an important part of our history. The tower gives us a chance to tell that story when folks ask about it when seeing it. I was privileged to celebrated and "remarry" a Jane Schlager Sunnyvale CA 94087 United States 6/15/2012 couple who met and married there 50 years ago at a reunion. Important to a lot of folks. The "Cube" is a memorial... a reminder to be vigilant in the defense of our freedoms. It Mark Meador San Jose CA 95120 United States 6/16/2012 should stand! Rob Adams Campbell CA 95008 United States 6/16/2012 This is a historic landmark for those of us in the south valley! Do not destroy this tower! I was stationed at the 774 AC&W in Madera, Ca.and went TDY to Almaden for one week, Gary Falkenberg Jersey Village TX 77040 United States 6/17/2012 Sept 21, 1964. The day of my first wedding anny. What a view from the top. Arlene Stiff Bend OR 97701 United States 6/17/2012 It's historical.Once it's gone it's too late. This is one of only a few remaining symbols of the "Cold War" that thanks to the USAF John Hawthorne Endicott NY 13760 United States 6/18/2012 never went "Hot". Karla Nubling Santa Clara CA 95051 United States 6/18/2012 Historical Significance and Landmark The radar tower defines Mt. Umunhum and will act as a beacon to recreational users. You don't have to permit access to the tower,just leave it in place. History and Open Space are Connie Rogers Gilroy CA 95020 United States 6/18/2012 overlapping here. Julie Priest San Jose CA 95124 United States 6/18/2012 It's a local landmark! Ed Jaworski Mesquite NV 589027 United States 6/18/2012 This South Bay icon is a bit of USAF history and should not be destroyed. 1 served in the 682nd Radar Sqdn., USAF from 8/65 to 2/67. Our work was valuable, and cherish all memories-including working in radar maintenance in the big FPS-24 buildng. It's Francis(Frank)Welsh Louisville KY 40245 United States 6/19/2012 a landmark,and I hope it can be spared and preserved for ages to come. I am an Air Force Vet who has served at similar radar stations,though not this particular one. I strongly believe that these locations should be preserved and saved as a historical Stephen Hornung Reynoldsburg OH 43068 United States 6/19/2012 monument for those that served there and as a relic of the Cold War. As a veteran of the USAF, and previous ACW radar technician, l feel we need to preserve these monuments to the men and women who maintained and operated these sentinels of the Cold War. May mankind never forget how close the doomsday clock was to striking Barry Thornbury Gurnee IL 60031 United States 6/19/2012 midnight. M The AFS Radar Tower should stay.There is a great deal of history that can be imparted to William Barclay Jr Sparks NV 89436 United States 6/19/2012 future generations. It also pays tribute to those who worked at this facility. Thank you all who have signed and commented. Your support is essential to help us save Basim Jaber South SF Bay Area CA United States 6/19/2012 this landmark. Dan Theurer San Jose CA 95124 United States 6/19/2012 This tower is part a the Bay Area's history. I have memories tied to the Station, People who lived there, and it has always been a landmark for me,from the time I first moved to San Jose, and lived in the Almaden Valley. I even got a tour when it was operational. Limited,to say the least.There were some areas Brian Davis Everett WA 98201 United States 6/19/2012 that required security clearance. A landmark from childhood. I hadn't been home in 15 years when i took my husband around joyce priest Fort Worth TX 76137 United States 6/20/2012 Los Gatos&San Jose. I made a point of looking for it to show him &talk about it. Bill Schubert San Jose CA 95123 United States 6/20/2012 This is part of the history of the whole SF Bay Area. I am privileged to say that my family and I were stationed at Almaden AFS (Mt. Umunhum) from 1978 a€" 1980. 1 worked in the ANFY-Q Computer Shop and loved it. But most importantly,we loved living atop of Mt. Umunhum, it was like living in an open resort. We Armando Barboza Brandon FL 33510 United States 6/20/2012 loved it and all our relatives and friends that came to visit loved it too. I grew up with the Tower out my front window. It was always a big mystery to me. I would Diana Dwyer Windsor CA 95492 United States 6/21/2012 love for it to be preserved and open for the public to tour. Dennis Feick Sunnyvale CA 94086 United States 6/21/2012 It is a landmark and should be considered a historical site. The entire tower should be preserved. It is viewable from the valley floor. D Kisler Gilroy CA 95020 United States 6/22/2012 The tower is a reminder of the times when our world was an uncertain one. The radar tower structure should not only be saved, but a replacement radar dish or facsimile thereof should be placed atop the building and an interpretive center be built in or nearby the tower. This is an important piece of American history.Today's children and young adults should learn about and understand the gravity of the Cold War and how it affected daily life even in Jonathan Carr Tracy CA 95376 United States 6/22/2012 suburbia. The Almaden AN/FPS-24 tower is one of the few remaining relics of the network of Air Defense Command facilities from the cold war days. People have commented that these radars were built to look for bombers that never came. We could just as well assert that the bombers did not come because they had little chance of getting through. This reminder Harry Pottol Sunnyvale CA 94087 United States 6/22/2012 should be preserved. I hike around Mt Uhm with friends often. It's like a beacon to the great history of the great J Larry Tuttle Sunnyvale, CA 94087 United States 6/23/2012 building that you can see from anywhere in the Bay Area. The radar tower has been a landmark for as long as I can remember in my 43 years. It would be a real shame to see it torn down since it's been a fixture of the Santa Clara Valley skyline Peter Ward San Jose CA 95123 United States 6/24/2012 for decades. kerry carlson Morgan Hill CA 95037 United States 6/24/2012 1 want to be able to show my children a reminder of the cold war. Robert Miller Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 6/24/2012 We need to remember the history of the cold war. I live relatively close to Mt. Umunhum and have biked and hiked nearby for many years. From throughout the Bay Area the Tower anchors me and serves to remind me of many Tim Sparks Saratoga CA 95070 United States 6/24/2012 great outdoor experiences. This tower represents a major piece of history for the Santa Clara Valley. To remove it James Acker San Martin CA 95046 United States 6/24/2012 would be a shame. Please save the Mt Um RADAR tower. It is an important historical and locational landmark for the South Bay region. Without the tower,the peak will just be another"lump" in a series of mountain lumps (from the valley ground-view perspective). On a field trip in the '70s, I stood at the base of that tower as a child. I still remember the awesome feeling of standing there looking up at the sky with the huge tower behind me. Most people don't realize how big the tower is.The tower has stood watch over the Valley of Hearts Delight for many SUE CONTRERAS SANTA CLARA CA 95051 United States 6/24/2012 years. Don't let the tower go the way of the orchards it once protected. When coming back to San Jose,when I see the tower,a peace comes over me to say"I'm john egan san jose CA 95120 United States 6/24/2012 now home". Without a past,we have no future. Preservation of the past reminds us how much better off we are today. The early warning radar site was a part of our defense system and part of our security of life. To restore this site to its'original splendor is admirable, but is not well thought out. Remember, once it is gone, it is gone forever.Any thoughts of a teardown of Anthony Bulygo Bakersfield CA 93314 United States 6/24/2012 the tower are unconscionalbe. This wonderful landmark bookends Lick Observatory and is an important-if poignant- Geoff Alexander San Jose CA 95112 United States 6/24/2012 reminder of this valley's importance to the history of 20th century technology. David Wooten Sheridan WY 82801 United States 6/24/2012 Used to live there. It's an icon and it should stay! It is about our history, and it is visible from all over the Santa Clara Valley. It's bad enough Joan Brodovsky San Jose CA 95126 United States 6/24/2012 to see Hangar One at Moffet Field go down. We don't need to continue this destruction. Important to save cultural history as well as natural history. This is a unique landmark seen all around the South Bay! And I suspect that the additional attraction of the radar tower will john seyfarth los altos CA 94022 United States 6/24/2012 bring out even more hikers and bikers to see this special destination! I have gazed upon the radar station every day for the last 54 years. It is a landmark and a piece of history. Tearing down the tower would serve no purpose other than appease a Ken Richardson San Jose CA 95124-3119 United States 6/24/2012 vocal idealogical group. Tom Kearney San Jose CA 95118 United States 6/24/2012 1 have live here for 37 years and the radar tower is a part of the mountain. It also is history. The Mt Umunhum Tower reflects a characteristic of our world outlook and our defense policy during nearly 50 years of the 20th Century. We are too quick to erase monuments Charles Benjamin Campbell CA 95008 United States 6/25/2012 that remind us of where we have been. Pamela Rebillot San Jose CA 95126 United States 6/25/2012 It's a valley landmark that can be seen for miles&should be preserved. This is part of our history and it is a tangible reminder.To demolish it would be a travesty to Carol Frost san Jose CA 95126 United States 6/25/2012 our collective memory. susansaso san Jose CA 95125 United States 6/25/2012 What if they had decided to tear down the pyramids? This was my father's last command before retiring in 1963. It was a place many memories were made. It has watched over the coast of California for 55 years. Is is a monument that Debbie Dewey Medina OH 44246-8869 United States 6/25/2012 should stand for many years to come. The tower has been up there longer than 75 percent of the residents of this county have been alive. It is a landmark. Without it, most people couldn't tell you which bump on the Santa Cruz Mountains ridgeline is Mt. U. People may disagree on aesthetics,on the tower's Frank Sweeney San Jose CA 95123 United States 6/25/2012 history and so forth. But those are no reasons to tear it down. I lived there between 1961-1963. Almaden AFS was my father's last active duty command. He retired in Jan 1963 as Almaden's Commander. Looking at the state and disrepair of the facility, it would have been nice to restore the old blockhouse to it's prior look. Once the S Joyce aurora CO 80015 United States 6/26/2012 asbestos remediation is complete, a good coat of paint and a memorial are warranted. Kristi Berryessa San Jose CA 95123 United States 6/26/2012 1 love this historic place. The "Cube" is a landmark; it's a piece of history. I liken it to an abandoned castle; if it can't be made safe for occupancy or use as a viewing platform,then it should be allowed to naturally deteriorate---however many millennia that may take. Don't waste public funds Paul Liebenberg 95023 United States 6/26/2012 tearing it down. I am 60 years old and have lived here all of my life. I remember this tower vividly from Dwight Denton San Jose CA 95120 United States 6/26/2012 when I was a child. The tower, not a representation, should remain in place.Growing up in the South Bay and seeing the tower has always been a constant that has drawn me and a lot of others. It is a part of our Nation's and our local history that is part of a much more significant story. It Anthony Correia Morgan Hill CA 95037 United States 6/26/2012 should remain so generations can see an important reminder of the Cold War. I have lived my entire life in the San Jose bay area with this iconic landmark"in my backyard".At one point after World War 11, my grandfather was stationed there, so it is semi sentimental in that aspect as well. Losing this landmark would be like missing a compass on Brett Kelley San Jose CA 95136 United States 6/26/2012 a ship,as it is a visual reference point to ones€TMS whereabouts while in the area. It's an iconic landmark and if destroyed would be the first one in the country to be Michael Cook Milpitas CA 95035 United States 6/26/2012 demolished. Dean Wilhelm Sausalito CA 96966-3064 United States 6/26/2012 In 19701 was Stationed there. I lived on the mountain top as a teenager in the early 70s while my father was serving as the radar station's medic.The tower should be preserved as monument to the men and women Jack Smith Morro Bay CA 93442 United States 6/26/2012 who served their country during the Cold War. bogdan marian 95032 United States 6/26/2012 it's a historic marker that should be saved Nathalie Mosbach Saratoga CA 95070 United States 6/26/2012 1 love the tower. It needs to stay! It is a very striking part of the ridgeline. I would be very sad to see it go away. It is a David Close San Jose CA 95123 United States 6/26/2012 landmark I see and look for every day. Not only is the tower an important historical artifact of the war that never went hot, it's an Steven Rudd Hampton VA 23669 United States 6/26/2012 iconic landmark I am a veteran of the Cold War stationed at Almaden during the excavation and concrete Michael Carter Lancaster PA 17603 United States 6/26/2012 pouring for the FPS-24 tower. I lived on Mount Umunhum from May 1973 to Jan 1977 and worked in the tower as the Chief of Maintenance's secretary from Sept 1975 to Jan 1977. This is a historical reminder of Cold War and it was an effective deterrent/shield for our country--the United States of Joyce Seal Fort Walton Beach FL 32547 United States 6/26/2012 America. I LOVE to see the tower on the mountain. I owned a home with a view from SF to Mtn. Umunhum and enjoyed the view. It's a fun and informative landmark. I am looking forward to visiting it and hiking. I also think the history fascinating, as well as important and critical Shannon McElyea Saratoga CA 95070 United States 6/26/2012 for future generations to learn about. I lived on the mountain as a child and have many fond memories of growing up there.The tower would remind people that an entire community existed on top of the mountain at Phyllis Willis Dothan AL 36305 United States 6/26/2012 one time. Gene McManus Baltimore OH 43105 United States 6/26/2012 This is an important landmark and piece of Cold War history. Mary Denney Los Gatos CA 95030 United States 6/26/2012 It has historical value Tangible bits of history must be preserved, especially when they present no harm or threat to the community.The tower may attract more visitors than the site without it. Folks in the valley will notice it and, perhaps,go on up to see it. Besides, I spent 3 years working in the Dan Coughlin Sumter SC 29154 United States 6/26/2012 building. Lawrence Knaff 59936 United States 6/26/2012 Veteran of AC&W Radar i WAS STATIONED AT 666 MILL VALLEY BEFORE ALMADEN WAS BUILT. BUT HAVE LOOKED UP MANY TIMES AT THE TOWER WHEN TRAVELING TO THE BAY AREA FROM FRESNO AND BRUCE BRODERSEN PEACHTREE CITY GA GA 30269 United States 6/26/2012 MONTEREY A SHAME TO TEAR IT DOWN. - Former AC&W member 1956-58, it is, what it is,the Cold War generated these buildings and those who operated them. NEVER FORGET our history. Those of us that are old timers need Frank Maio Great Mills MD 20634-2005 United States 6/26/2012 to be reminded from whence we came. Like the Titan Missile Museum in Arizona,this is a part of history that younger generations should learn about. Many don't know about or understand the cold war. Without Sandi Salvo Phoenix AZ 85048 United States 6/26/2012 knowledge, we are destined to repeat history!! Scott Schlachter San Jose CA 95118 United States 6/26/2012 This is such an important local historical monument/icon! This tower is one of the most importasnt locations left where our servicemen protected the U.S.during the Cold War. It was the last and first successful war that did NOT include fighting our enemy.There are almost no evidnece remaining that allows the public to honor their service. Signed A Cold War veteran art boudreault san jose CA 95120 United States 6/26/2012 Art Boudreault Marco Soldano San Jose CA 95124 United States 6/26/2012 This is an historical landmark,there's no way they can tear it down. I grew up in SJ. I remember the Santa Tracking reports. The rotating array was like a beacon in the golden days of the emerging Silicon Valley. Make it a Park and I'll build trail. I would Daniel Abernethy Santa Cruz CA 95062 United States 6/26/2012 visit frequently and as long as able. Thank You. I am a former long-term resident of the SF Bay Area with family still residing in Santa Clara County. I am also a Cold War veteran of the USAF and served at similar ADC SAGE Radar sites for 8 years of my life.The radar tower is a part of our 20th Century American heritage. Ralph B Wilks Colby KS 67701 United States 6/26/2012 It should be preserved and rendered safe for visitors. 1. It's easier to explain to cold war when there is tangible evidence. 2. It makes Mt. Umunhum more prominent and easier to identify. 3.Taking it down, erases my history. 4. Excellent counter balance to Mt. Hamilton and the domes. 5.Gives a sense of"there"to greater San Jose--a focal point. Jean Dresden San Jose CA 95125 United States 6/26/2012 6. Does not harm the environment or ruin the breeding capacity of an species. It's an important reminder of the Cold War Era for the region and the country. A time we and our children should never forget because of how close we came several times to ending all life on the earth as we know it. (ie:The Cuban Missle Crisis). Tearing it down would be Paul Twombly Saratoga CA 95070 United States 6/26/2012 akin to tearing down Hanger One at Moffet Field. This is a reminder of the cold war that should not be forgotten and a part of San Jose Robert Sippel San Jose CA 95126 United States 6/26/2012 history, please keep the tower! I was the last commander of Almaden AFS. Retaining the main radar tower will serve as a lasting memorial to honor the men and women who served to protect the freedom and sovereignty of this great nation while serving their country on this remote mountaintop Chuck Skinner Gainesville VA 20155 United States 6/26/2012 outpost I grew up seeing the tower and think it has enough historic significance to be saved and Deborah Torrens San Jose aCA 95123 United States 6/26/2012 restored. Plus it's a familiar landmark! SUSAN GROVER san jose CA 95120 United States 6/26/2012 As an Almaden resident for the past 35 years, George Herrick Chittenden VT 5737 United States 6/26/2012 A reminder of the cold war period that once torn down is lost forever. Very few symbols Of our nations sacrifice in the cold war exist. History compels that it be Bob Guillot San Jose, CA 95126 United States 6/26/2012 preserved. Alan Kayser Los Gatos CA 95031 United States 6/26/2012 Historical significance. Our history helps define who we are and where we're going. Physical reminders of our Ralph Pearce San Jose CA 95125 United States 6/27/2012 history are critical to our interest and awareness. Joyce Keckler San Jose CA 95125 United States 6/27/2012 1 like the box Joyce Banks San Jose CA 95127 United States 6/27/2012 Interested, I used to live there. This tower has been a landmark and welcoming sight for decades. The history of,and affection for,this beacon is very strong in the South Bay. If it is demolished,we will have missed a chance to do something that will both inform future generations and provided an kathleen thorne san jose CA 95120 United States 6/27/2012 "anchor"for a recreational area. I was stationed at the 822nd,Cottonwood, ID and worked on the FPS-24 for a brief period. John Kwaczala fresno CA 93727 United States 6/27/2012 Shipped to Alaska shortly after it became operational. Roberta Jaques San Jose CA 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Because this needs to stay as a lookout over the valley! It's a part of us! - ----- -- - -- Aaron Mackley San Jose CA 95136 United States 6/27/2012 Make it a museum..lconic south bay fixture Dan Stephenson Sacramento CA 95842 United States 6/27/2012 1 toured that site in the cub and boy scouts Paul Gregory Palo Alto CA 94306 United States 6/27/2012 It's a landmark. It is a bit of history, and the Bay Area has saved too little of its history. I moved to San Jose in 1955 and still have a home there. I have looked up at the tower, driven to the tower, and patrolled the land around the tower for over 30 years. It is a JON MAESTRI Junction City CA 96048 United States 6/27/2012 landmark and every effort should be made to keep it in place For decades I had wondered what that tower above the Almaden Hills was. I would like the Johanna Padilla San Jose CA 95127 United States 6/27/2012 opportunity to se it up close and share that experience with my family. * Adds a sense of"place"there--otherwise, it's just another of many mountain tops. * It's part of the History of the Valley * if kept, it can be removed later if need be; if removed, it can never be replaced * It would make a great viewing tower: climb up and look over the trees to see the valley below * it's a place to go to, to drive, bike, or walk up to: to be able to tell others on the valley floor"see! --we went up there!" * San Jose tore down all traces of the 1st capitol of California; now we're losing all traces of "the Cold War". Mt. Um. is part of the sequence between the Spanish Missions and Silicon Lawrence Ames San Jose CA 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Valley Ann Garino 95008 United States 6/27/2012 To save the tower, which is history The tower is a landmark for me-it's how I know which mountain Um is. Also, I hike Barbara Goldstein San Jose CA 95125 United States 6/27/2012 Almaden Quicksilver Park a lot,and I LOVE looking at the tower. Please keep this beacon of the cold war intact,to remind us of where we have been and Lisa Harmer Campbell CA 95008 United States 6/27/2012 where we don't want to go again. REX HILL SAN JOSE CA 95124 United States 6/27/2012 THIS PLACE IS AN IMPORTANT PIECE OF HISTORY AND SHOULD REMAIN THERE. Chris Tann San Jose CA 95119 United States 6/27/2012 The radar tower is an icon of San Jose life, and a very important part of our Cold-War history This building is one of the most recognizable monuments to those who served in the Cold War, and a uniquely visible historical site reminding future generations of the sacrifices Dewey Paris Pasadena TX 77503-1515 United States 6/27/2012 made to preserve the security and privileges they enjoy. I remember the radar rotating as part of my childhood,the cold war is part of history and Doug Billington 95008 United States 6/27/2012 this building is a reminder. Jeff Patton 95008 United States 6/27/2012 Love the history,the sight of the tower from anywhere in the valley. My father was a radar tech in WW 2 and I want to preserve this historical site for future Cheryl Royer Castro Valley CA 94546 United States 6/27/2012 generations. Carmel D Forte San Jose CA 95124 United States 6/27/2012 Because it is a part of our history and to keep for future generations. Thank you. Some persons still need to be taught that this and other"gap-filler" rotating radar antennas were deemed necessary to provide detection of low-level bomber attacks from the West. Fortunately the giant metallic antenna has been removed. I am sure the area near the tower GEOFFREY HARMER SAN JOSE CA 95126 United States 6/27/2012 is to poluted for human-use,anyway. The tower is an iconic landmark that although man made is now and should remain a lasting Mary Lindsay Santa Clara CA 95051 United States 6/27/2012 part of Mt. Umunhum. The tower and visitors exhibit would help make this an enjoyable'destination'and expose Matthew Boxberger United States 6/27/2012 folks to the open spaces and views around it-a 'win-win'. Tearing down buildings that have historical value always proves to be wrong and sometimes Bob Morrison 94086 United States 6/28/2012 very sad. WE NEED TO SAVE A PART OF THE AAIR FORCE WE WORKED FOR.AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED,THOSE OF US WHO WORKED THE RADAR SITE WERE IN A DIFFERENT AIR AUDEL RODRIGUEZ WARNER ROBINS GA _ 31093 United States 6/28/2012 FORCE DUE TO THE REMOTE LOCATIONS, Tired of losing all touch with the past by destroying buildings and structures that will never Mary McCuistion SAN JOSE CA 95125 United States 6/28/2012 be replaced. We're losing sight of who we've been. Denise Lowney Campbell CA 95008 United States 6/28/2012 It is open space why are we destroying history!?Save the site as is!! Because it part of Santa Clara Valley's heritage, a landmark before it was Silicon Valley. It was a sentry that watched over the Bay Area. It should remain as a reminder of different times for future generations and before all of our history is gone over covered over with Joe Enfantino Los Gatos CA 95031-0746 United States 6/28/2012 houses, buildings and and cell sites! I actually enjoy seeing our tower. It defines the mountain and it reminds me of a Norman William Gallagher San Jose CA 95120 United States 6/28/2012 castle. I believe in keeping structures like this to remind to future generations not everything was "digital! Suzanne Felton 95125 United States 6/29/2012 1 miss the star they used to put up at Christmas time. Julie Scheve San Jose CA 95125 United States 6/29/2012 It's such a landmark. I would hate to look up at the mountain and not see it there. Ken Williams Raleigh NC 27616 United States 6/30/2012 Former Air Force radar vet. It is a historic reminder of previous efforts to keep us safe.....A great landmark of the days before the valley was silicone!Visitors always ask about the tower(easily seen from my Paul White Si CA 95120 United States 6/30/2012 back windows)and leads to day trips to the mountain.... Keep It! Back in the 60s,the Umunhum radar made my family feel safe.Seeing the old tower today E. Carl Hanks Jr. San Jose CA 95120-2238 United States 6/30/2012 reminds us that"the price of liberty is eternal vigilance". We love it! The cube distinguishes Mt. Um and has as long as I can remember. It's a comforting sight, Mary Feldman 95126 United States 7/1/2012 reminding me where I am. am a US Air Force veteran who served at similar installations during the Cold War. It is a John Tianen Tucson AZ 85750 United States 7/1/2012 part of our history that needs to be preserved. You can always remove it but you can't rebuild it. When it is gone it is gone. There is no do michael krisman campbell CA 95008 United States 7/2/2012 over. Erasing history is to erase who we are. I believe it is important to preserve this tower to Kristen McIntyre Fremont CA 94538 United States 7/2/2012 retain a memory of the cold war,and those who served to protect us. Useful for future scientific and/or military use,e.g. radio astronomy,control signals to Andrew Korsak 94062 United States 7/2/2012 orbiters,tracking space junk about to fall. I visited this center when I was an Explorer Scout years ago, and it definitely has a long history that is important not only as a lookout in the Cold War, but also as local landmark just above the Almaden Valley. It is as much a part of our landscape as the towers on Loma Prieta,or the telescopes on Mt. Hamilton! Let's preserve our local historical landmark and the people who spent time working there for our benefit! It simply BELONGS on the Russ Lucas San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/3/2012 mountain top as a part of our area! William Desler san jose CA 95120 United States 7J4j2012 A Major landmark and reminder of the cold war period I am signing because it is a part of our history and the tower gives recognition to the ones Joyce Brock san jose CA 95132 United States 7/4/2012 who served our country. This is an historic site that represents a time in our history that we should not forget. Kathy Sullivan Morgan Hill CA 95037 United States 7/4/2012 Preservation of the past helps us steer a better course for the future. The tower is part of Santa Clara, Santa Cruz history. And it the landmark that all new drivers Charles Spencer San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/4/2012 in these counties use to orient themselves. I grew up in the shadow of the Mt. Umunhum radar towers. my grandfather worked there when my mom was growing up in San Jose. I love the mountains, and the tower sitting atop Catherine Pittman San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/4/2012 it.San Jose wouldn't be the same without that iconic site. Please save the tower! ed peterson United States 7/4/2012 the tower is an important part of the history of this area. Colleen Kirker San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/4/2012 This is our local history. Save it. I grew up in San Jose right under the cube.The tower is a historical monument and would serve as an attraction for people to venture to the top of the mountain and explore.The cost of preserving the tower seems like it would be minimal compared to how frequented James Zoland Vancouver WA 98664 United States 7/4/2012 the top of the mountain would be by future generations. _. ------- -- --- _ I was born and raised in South San Jose. The radar tower has been a part of my life and my extended family just like the Mt. Hamilton with the Lick Observatory. Please don't tear down visual history (including the option to leave the exterior walls 6-10 feet tall as a public Matt Lawler San Jose CA 95123 United States 7/4/2012 gathering place). I'm signing this petition because my father worked in that tower in the 60's. I lived there in Rene Banks San Jose CA 95127 United States 7/5/2012 base housing with my family and it is an important historical site. Stephanie M. Brown San Jose CA 95126 United States 7/5/2012 We should be proud this site was chosen and is now a part of San Jose history. Rob Riley Menlo Park CA 94025 United States 7/5/2012 You can't bring back a piece of history once you destroy it. kassandra kisler elliott Alhambra CA 91801 United States 7/5/2012 This is part of our bay area history.And, something my grandfather was involved with. A tear down of the radar tower is a disgraceful and disrespectful act towards our proud Dave Jenson San Jose CA 95135 United States 7/6/2012 Veterans. Please seal it up and retain it as it is an important part of our region's history. This is a landmark, part of our history, not only locally but nationally. How will younger Carol Nunes-McNamara El Dorado CA 95623 United States 7/6/2012 people learn if we erase everything. The good and the bad. Have lived in Almaden Valley all my life and love the Radar Tower. Can remember when it Scott Wiebe United States 7/6/2012 operated on the hill. The history is great and is a great reminder of our freedom. The Tower on this Mountain stands as a reminder that a "War" can be fought without death and destruction.The Cold War is the epitome of how conflict's should be handled.This is what we and the rest of the world beg for,yet almost no monuments or any real appreciation is shown for anything or anyone that participated in it. Here you have a Monument already standing strong and tall and we are debating on what it will look like, after it's torn down.So the message to the new volunteers of our military,for the media and all the people that sound off when a war erupts answer me this. Should we fight a "War" with negotiations, technology and brains or bombs and bullets? If this Tower was never there or if we didn't perform our duties and the Cold War turned Hot,there may never have been anyone here to walk on those paths,to breath the fresh air or to take in the precious views from up there,or anywhere else.With a war fought like the Cold War and ending the way the Cold War ended we all have to be reminded the real "Memorial" saved by the people working at that Tower is this planet and all life on this planet.The fact is,every person that goes up there to hike or take in a big breath of fresh air and look out over the ocean or the city lights below should first walk over and give that Tower a big kiss and thank it and thank everything it stands for before continuing on there merry way. Edward Doherty Sunnyvale CA 94086 United States 7/6/2012 The Tower on this Mountain stands as a reminder that a war can be fought without Monica Pound Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 7/6/2012 Grew up with this tower and still see it everyday A great counterpoint between the Cold War needs of the US and the country it was intended to protect. That threat was real and its great to be able to see it and learn from it in the future,after the site is re-opened to the public. The Bay Area has already eliminated gary miskimon San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/6/2012 most of its proud military history,why one more piece that is so visible? Don Nordloff San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/6/2012 A great icon of the valley and a worthy icon of our Cold War warriors. The tower MUST be saved! It is a landmark,and a tribute to all that served during the cold Patrick Wicker Danville CA United States 7/6/2012 war! I would like the tower to remain as a reminder of the Air Force's contribution to the security Robert Tolley Gastonia NC 28056-9610 United States 7/6/2012 of our great country. This RADAR tower is as much a piece of history of the Santa Clara valley as any historic building, or highway,that are regularly preserved for posterity. Contrary to tearing the John Georges Santa Clara CA 95051 United States 7/7/2012 building down, it should be restored and turned into a Cold War museum. Tearing down this tower would be a travesty. The site is not just wilderness in need of restoration. It also represents crucial history that should not be forgotten. I advocate that the tower be preserved and a museum or placards tell the story of what went on here Nancy Williams Los Altos CA 94022 United States 7/7/2012Iduring World War II I agree that saving the tower is important for its historical significance, but also I want it preserved because I truly enjoy looking at it and photographing it. It annoys me that some people call it"ugly." It's not an "eyesore," it's an ICON and as others have said, an important landmark. I like watching it from different angles and distances, in different lighting and weather. I would definitely miss seeing it if it were removed. I will be at the meeting 7/18 Jeff Gordon 95120 United States 7/8/2012 to voice my support. Thank you for creating this petition. I like Mt. umunhum left as it is without any more money spem Nt on it. It is history and worthy of preservation. George Romer San Jose CA 95120,United States 7/9/2012 We need to save the tower in honor of our Veterans. Even more of the building should be Josie Supencheck San Jose CA 95136 United States 7/10/2012 saved. It is San Jose history. Thank you. We were stationed at that Radar Site in 1969. 1 am from California and we have very strong Louella Parrish Abilene TX 79605 United States 7/10/2012 ties there. What a land mark that is! Please keep it up there. This tower marks Mt. Umunhum as well as having historical significance. Please do not tear Clyde Horn San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/10/2012 it down. Jaime Pirnie Tracy CA 95376 United States 7/10/2012 Because it's a part of Almaden's history,we all grew up with it and it is an icon of the area. It is important to retain military structures for future generations to visit and study;just as today we visit places like Fort Laramie, Fort Sumpter,and Fort Mc Henry. The radar tower symbolizes an important aspect of our defense (particularly for the Bay Area)during the cold suzanne Crawford santa clara CA 95050 United States 7/11/2012 war. It should NOT be torn down. I grew up in Almaden Valley and the tower is iconic to the area. Why spend the money Michael Hertzer Morgan Hill CA 95037 United States 7/11/2012 tearing it down? Is it gonna fall and hit something? Didn't think so. Dominic Mazzone san Jose CA 95111 United States 7/11/2012 It's a Historical Land Mark!!! I grew up able to see this out of my bedroom window... it's a huge part of my childhood Kathleen Gregory Keysville VA 23947 United States 7/11/2012 skyline! This building is an icon...it's a landmark that can be seen all over the valley and I think that it should stay. In my mind this is a historic landmark and I reference it whenever I'm out and Charles Haynes Campbell CA 95008 United States 7/11/2012 about. Wayne A Witzel Custer WA 98240-9407 United States 7/11/2012 Former AF stationed at Almaden AFS. MROSD:You may own this land; but you do not own our history.Why you seem so intent on Sean Sullivan Cupertino CA 95014 United States 7/12/2012 destroying a historical landmark is a mystery to us all--and a tragedy. To me,the radar tower is a historic landmark that I think should be preserved to teach Dani McKenzie Roy WA 98580 United States 7/12/2012 future generations about how we started understanding outer space. Jim Carrigan Malvern PA 19355 United States 7/13/2012 This is an historic landmark. Those who served during the cold war have been forgotten by many, including our present US Government. Physical reminders of the service of these cold war veterans need to be retained so that future generations might be reminded of the war that was won by John Stephens Maxeys GA 30671 United States 7/13/2012 prepardness and vigilance. David Ullstrom San lose CA 95120 United States 7/13/2012 Would be like cutting off your nose. Ralph Carrigan Waretown NJ 08758-2105 United States 7/13/2012 spent a week at the Air Force Base while our son Jim was stationed there. My father was stationed at the Radar Station in 1957-1958. It has been a part of the south valleyshistory for so many years. It would be heartless to tear it down. Using the legends of the Native Americans as an excuse to tear down the tower is the wrong move. What about the memories of the thousands of men and women who have served and continue to serve Elaine Durand San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/13/2012 our country. What about their heritage? Do preserve the memory of the people of he USAir Force who once lived and worked on the mountain--I once lived on the mountain as a US Air Force dependent and my husband Coralie Elliott Victoria V9A1V4 Canada 7/13/2012 worked at the radar tower. Craig Scott Watervliet NY 12189 United States 7/14/2012 It is as historic as the Montauk PT.LI NY AFS radar that we are trying to preserve. This is not only a piece of history, it has commercial potential. Also, according to numerous articles,the majority of locals want it saved.The voice of the Paul Smith Wichita KS 67201 United States 7/14/2012 people should be heard. This artefact is part of 20th century history. So many things were destroyed in their time as obsolete that now would be priceless. History will be poorer without Cold War examples Eric Richards Loveland CO 80537 United States 7/14/2012 like this. I was a member of the 682d from Jan 74 till April 75. 1 lived and worked on the second floor of the cube as a height finder tech. I have many memories of living there and want all to know that the tower represents an ongoing monument to the airmen that served our country.While other soldiers fought with guns and knives, we fought with voltmeters, oscilloscopes,and technical knowledge.While americans slept in their beds,an Almaden USAF soldier stood vigil watching over them. Only the best technically oriented soldiers were stationed at Almaden. I do not feel that the beauty of nature at the site would conflict with the strength and solace of a building that preserved peace. Preserving our monument will let our grandchildren understand that the people that lived inside of it cared about them. Thank you gary pittebger Oceano CA 93445 United States 7/14/2012 Gary Pittenger This has been a local landmark for the last 50 years. I see it every day, and I value the link to Dana Crom San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/14/2012 history that it represents. This site should be preserved even in a state of arreseted decay as some of the base is considered historic(dating to 1957 so technically historic).The site played an integral part in carrie ashe tuolumne CA 95379 United States 7/14/2012 our nation's military history and should be recorded and documented. Paul Kostecki San Jose CA 95123 United States 7/15/2012 A valuable Landmark with historyl Joel Deuter Palo Alto CA 94301 United States 7/15/2012 Preserve cultural history William Seal Vernon FL 32462 United States 7/16/2012 Spent my formative years in the community represented by that tower. was stationed at pt.arena afs.these sites are an important part of our history and should be richard chinn sammamish WA 98074 United States 7/16/2012 preserved in some fashion other than an exhibit in a museum. Almaden AFS was my first duty station in the Air Force in 1965. The mission at Almaden was to ensure that if an enemy attempted to attack there would be sufficient warning to launch interceptors to shoot down the bombers before they could complete their missiion. Failing that, it was to ensure the citizens would have sufficient warning to seek shelter. In order to accomplish that mission,the personnel assigned to Almaden worked 247, 365 days a year. The tower is the last reminder of that important mission and the men and women who dedicated their lives to keeping America safe during uncertain times- it.deserves to be Steven Rudd Hampton VA 23669 United States 7/16/2012 preserved. John LeBlanc Troy OH 45373 United States 7/16/2012 Stationed there 1972-1975 682 Radar sq. i Please save the 5-story Radar Tower. I look up to it many days and it reminds me of another Robb Moore San Jose CA 95128 United States 7/16/2012 time, another history. Paul Barrish Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 7/16/2012 Honor those who served to protect us. Stationed on a Radar site in MT. 57-58. Worked in Bay Area 62-63 and saw the tower on the mountain. Pleas save it. as an honor to those of us who protected the USA in the 50s to 80s. Robert Wildrick Blairsville GA 30512 United States 7/16/2012 Bob Wildrick I have hiked all around Mt. Um and seen it from many different view points. When I am in the valley, I often look up at the tower. I feel as though I am looking at it from deep in the Andrea Wheeler San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/17/2012 woods on one of my hikes, and feel peaceful again. Please don't tear down my touchstone! It is a part of our history to remind of once was and pay tribute to those that service on Mt. D Gurrola San lose CA 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Umunhum for this Country. KEEP THE TOWER! It is an integral and beloved part of the valley skyline.A historical Glenn Perea San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/17/2012 cultural,and easily recognizable positional landmark. I have lived in Almaden since 1977, that tower has always been a landmark that I have used to steer myself home,and I have used it for giving directions.Whenever I am away from home for any amount of time, I always look for the tower to give me a sense of Noel Seaton United States 7/17/2012 'homecoming'. Grew up in the shadow of mt um. Heard the beeps on the radio. Felt secure that someone was watching out for us during the cold war. It's part of our cultural landscape to see the carol beebe San Jose CA 95112 United States 7/17/2012 box on the hill! Brian Perasso San Jose CA 95126 United States 7/17/2012 This tower is a reminder of our past,and defines the Coast Range in the South Bay. History. My dad performed audits for the Air Force up there and on those days we could sue MCALLISTER SAN JOSE CA 95133-1528 United States 7/17/2012 look up and see where he was. In the late 1960's through the early 1980's, I was employed as a Western Electric telecom installer in the San Jose and Silicon Valley area.Throughout that period,The Western Electric Company of The Bell System was contracted by Pacific Telephone to provide installation and update services to the Almaden Air Force Station telecom system.Almaden AFS was a self-contained military facility. Besides the incredible views,the mountain-top station provided complete housing and recreational facilities for Air Force personnel and their families assigned there. Children of dependents were bussed to local schools on daily round-trip schedules, down the hill in the morning,then back up the hill in the afternoon.All visitors and contractors were stopped at a 7X24 armed guard security checkpoint gate. Armed with M-16 automatic weapons and K9 dogs. Only those with valid credentials were permitted entry.On one unforgettable occasion I received an escorted tour inside the massive radar tower. In one large auditorium-sized room, numerous screens and monitors manned by by technicians, surrounded a constantly changing satellite image of the Western Pacific Area of Operations.The tower tour was somewhat reminiscent of the "War Room" Leonard Martinez Fremont CA 94555 United States 7/17/2012 scene in the movie "Dr. Strangelove". Many new military technological advances were William Anderson San Jose CA 95129 United States 7/17/2012 It is historic to this area Joseph LaPointe Sunnyvale CA 94087 United States 7/17/2012 Has historical significance that is relevant to the technology development in Silicon Valley. Warren Geissert United States 7/17/2012 The tower is a familiar landmark that distinguishes that particular mountain from the others. doug Benton san jose CA 95118 United States 7/17/2012 its cool to have a building with a box on it, it marks our bay area -makes it stand out. Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower has been my favorite landmark around San Jose for as long as I Brandon Ingram San Jose CA 95116 United States 7/17/2012 have been alive. As kids, my brother and I always would make up stories as to what that building on the Andrew Ingram San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/17/2012 mountain was. It was an integral and memorable part of my childhood. Eliz Mcglauflin Haof moon bay CA 94019 United States 7/17/2012 Family are long time residents. I grew up near San Jose. Part of our history! I lived in the valley from 1958-2010 and now transplanted to Fresno. I still have family in the valley, when I return to visit the tower is the first think I look for to remind me of home. I'm a Disabled Vietnam Vet with 2 tours in country, I realize the importance the tower represents because we both served for the freedom of this great nation the United States of America. Returning home from the conflit I felt dishonored both times. Don't let this happen to the tower as it was with us.This is a piece of history that is unique to the Santa Clara Benny Reloba Fresno CA 93704 United States 7/17/2012 County and me. Karen Clinton San Jose CA 95123 United States 7/17/2012 That tower is a beacon landmark, i do not want to see it go! It sits above us, watching over us, as it has for decades. It is a memorial, a monument, and Bryan Buck San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/17/2012 an icon of our South Bay community. The radar tower is a regional landmark from the time of my childhood.There is no point in TIMOTHY SCHIERLING San Jose CA 95116 United States 7/17/2012 demolishing it. Leave it there. This tower is a piece of history and should be preserved because of that. It doesn't matter if the building is regarded as ugly or beautiful; it doesn't matter if you approve or disapprove of the military; history is something sadly lacking in the Bay Area and in California generally. heather dixon London NW17NH United Kingdom 7/17/2012 We should be hanging on to what we have here. This is a significant part of both our local history and our nation's history. Removing it is not a significant cost savings. Make the tower a part of our historical story and a prompt for Elizabeth Johnson San Jose CA 95127 United States 7/17/2012 discussion. It is also a thank you to those who served. The tower is how everybody recognizes the Mountain. It's part of the history,and part of the visual image in our collective consciousness. Most of us have never had the opportunity to go up the Mountain-the tower is what will connect our past experience of seeing it in Lynn Hsu San Jose CA 95126 United States 7/17/2012 the distance to the future experiences of being able to go there.Why tear it down? I grew up going to school in Almaden Valley attending both Bret Harte and Leland (Class of 99).The Umumhum Tower is the one standout landmark in Almaden and you can't get rid of iW It holds a mythic significance to me,akin to Neuschwanstein castle in Bavaria, Germany, although more minimal and plain in scope.Tell me there is not something mysterious and alluring as you approach the Almaden Valley and see a cubical building on a mountain. It's a breath of fresh air in an area of San Jose that has little personality and distinction in terms of geography(a few mercury mines and abandoned barns being the exception).Almaden is pleasant but it needs a little bit of character and spontaneity to keep it an attractive place to live. Preserving the Radar Tower Cube does this, and commemorates it's unique and James Holmes San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/17/2012 overlooked role in the Cold War.What other landmark does Almaden really have? HOLLY BITTER Sunnyvale CA 94089 United States 7/17/2012 Save the Square!!! Because the tower is a historic building to the people of this area, regardless of it's national Matt Lee San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/17/2012 status, and therefor should be preserved. My family has been in this area since before California was a state. The radar tower on top of Mt. Umunhum is a familiar landmark I will personally miss if it is torn down.The stories about what it was and rumors of a missile silo at the top of Mt. Umunhum along side the radar tower were thrilling to me as a young child,during the times of red alert and yellow alert drills. It is a part of our local history. I don't care if there are other towers much like it in other places,this is OUR landmark just as much as Lick Observatory and Hangar One at NASA/Ames are. Please leave it there. I'd love to tour it and see the old IBM computing equipment inside. You could charge for tours. Linda Montgomery San Jose CA 95117 United States 7/17/2012 This tower represents the importance of the Bay Area's industry's contribution to our Bob Grandey San Jose CA 95123 United States 7/17/2012 national defense. It does not spoil the view of the mountains from the valley! Pat Dewhitt San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/17/2012 It has been a landmark and marker of history for my whole life.Why shouldn't it stay? Jim Usrey Little River SC 29566 United States 7/17/2012 It is a memorable and worthy site.To many it would be destroying a part of history. Being 4th generation San josean, I understand and appreciate mt ums tower significance to Russell mason San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/17/2012 the area. Sharon Haneman San jose CA 95136 United States 7/17/2012 Love the history of this tower. Please leave it be. To valley residents,the tower is an integral part of Mt. Umhumnum. I am a pacifist,who also values history. It is wrong to deny its place in the history of our valley, our nation, and the world. To many, it has served as a landmark that assured us that our nation was maintaining defensive vigilance. Let us not bury our heads in the sand--the Cold War existed; we should acknowledge it and remind ourselves to avoid bringing ourselves and the world Jean Mundell Los Gatos CA 95032-7688 United States 7/17/2012 to such perilous times again. We need to preserve the sites of historical significance related to the Cold War and John Hartley SUNNYVALE CA 94086 United States 7/17/2012 remember those who served in it. We live here in peaceful "Silicon Valley" and need this reminder that we're not immune to Curtis Jones San Jose CA 95112 United States 7/17/2012 the horrors of war-both hot and cold. Tom Sanders San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/17/2012 Save it for our future generations! I was born and raised in South San Jose and I see the tower as part of our history, part of San Lori Baumgartner San Jose CA 95112 United States 7/17/2012 Jose. PLEASE, save the tower!!!! I teach school children every year about Santa Clara County history and the importance of water conservation. The tower is a landmark that facilitates a discussion about our history, the headwaters of the Guadalupe river and the Guadalupe watershed. It's demolition will be Mary Machado Groveland CA 95321 United States 7/17/2012 a loss to our community. This is an icon. We live in Almaden Vally and love looking at the tower. We grew up in the time everyone worried about a nuclear attack. We can't afford to forget this time in our Kelly Frazer San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/17/2012 country. It must be saved! I believe tower is a memorable and honorable way for people to be able to distinguish Mt. Jason Otoshi San Jose CA 95129-3748 United States 7/17/2012 Umunhum from the other peaks in the area. The former Alamaden Air Force Station's main radar tower is a south bay icon. Everyone I know can point out Mt. Um because of the tower. Not too many people know about Gail Snyder, III San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/17/2012 Alamaden AFS or what went on there. Born and raised under the watchful eye of the tower- I was born in SJ in 1963. Although, it Greg Freeman San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 was not in service much of that time it is a significant part of my life experience in SJ. My late father,an Air Force officer,worked in radar throughout most of his career. He worked in the tower. Whatever we may now think about the cold war and the dangers that may or may not have existed,the tower should remain as a remembrance of that time and those concerns. Kathleen Bonner Pacific Grove CA 93950 United States 7/18/2012 Rather than "ugly," it is interesting still, and should be preserved. The tower is a reminder of the era when an attack by the Soviet Union was a possibility and a threat that we all lived under. The Early Warning system provided protection and a deterrent for everybody living on the West Coast, including the decedents of the Ohlone. Why do we assume that if they were able to speak the original Ohlone people would want Edward Atlas San Jose CA 95128 United States 7/18/2012 to remove the tower? They might recognize it's symbolism and say to leave it in place. As a San Jose native,the tower is part of my childhood.An imposing landmark to designate the mountain range to the South. Constant urban myths and just swapping of made up stories! When some of the first"speed checked by radar" street signs went up, my buddy said "That radar tower up there can tell if your speeding here" . Rod Robertson san jose CA 95118 United States 7/18/2012 And i believed him! Col. Richard D. Kelly, my father, retired as Electronics Officer at Almaden AFS. He'd served our country for 32 years, beginning before WWII. My sister and I are "Air Force Brats." We were reassigned, like fellow brats,with our mother and father almost every year.That wasn't a sacrifice for us as children,was a sacrifice by our mother(like other USAF wives), but it did forge a respect for what USAF members in particular gave our country...whether we supported political policy or not. Almaden AFS was a crowning assignment for our father. I want to see his contribution,and John Kelly Albuquerque NM 87120 United States 7/18/2012 that of his fellows, honored by keeping the Tower in perpetuity. To paraphrase George Orwell: 'Good people can sleep at night because rough men stand guard.'The tower is our old sentinel. Let him stay!The tower also has emotional value for the Valley. Many of us driving home from work or vacation see the marker and quietly think, Thomas Kussell San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/18/2012 home, almost home.A sense of calm accompanies the thought. The tower building is a reference point for everyone in the South Bay; it would be a loss to Eric Opp United States 7/18/2012 see it demolished. Mike Kriege San Jose CA 95129 United States 7/18/2012 Please save the Mt. Umunhum tower. I like it. The park can be found from far away when you look at the Umunhum tower. I've lived here in Santa Clara County for over 50 years and this is a historical landmark in this county. I look forward to the park opening and being able to see the tower,just as we were able to see the hangat at moffet field. Please do not destroy it. It is in the middle of the mountain and is in Martha Mayen United States 7/18/2012 no way of any other construction. Lived in SJ all my life with this iconic structure always being visible on the mountain. It used to be a building of mystery when younger, but as I grew older it became just a familiar figure Paul Washington San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 of the landscape and horizon. Save the radar tower for our historical heritage and landmark reasons. Make it a visual lookout for future generations of visitors to see the wonderful 360 degree vista of this bay area. in fact, erect a flagpole on to top, raise the American flag on special occasions such as Veterans Day, Flag Day and Memorial Day to remind us of Freedom and the sacrifices solders and patriots have made to the freedoms we all enjoy in the United States. I have Herbert Beck San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 lived here for 40 years and this is a bay area landmark. I grew up with this tower, and I never got to visit it. It is a part of my life, and I would hate to Steve Dorsey United States 7/18/2012 see it go away. Please save the tower. Growing up in South San Jose during the Cold War, I saw the tower every day and felt protected. Even today, whenever I visit home, I look for the tower on the hill and explain to whomever is with me that the tower played a role in protected our shores. Don't tear it Jon Schierling Fremont CA 94538 United States 7/18/2012 down. Make it a historic site. Our history is important and we need reminders of it. Please leave the tower right where it Amy Alexander Really CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 is! Louise Robinson San lose CA 95148 United States 7/18/2012 This is a landmark! It is something that we need to keep for the future. I have been viewing this tower from wherever I've lived in the Santa Clara Valley--Saratoga Katie Hassett San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/18/2012 to San Jose. It needs to stay right where it is--and make a park around it! I served at radar sites for most of my 22 years in USAF.Almaden AFS was one of the more desirable duty stations.The tower adds to the beauty of an otherwise unremarkable Christian McWilliams Jr. San lose CA 95123-4864 United States 7/18/2012 mountaintop. The Directors of the Open Space District Board need to spend a little more thought on the values of the people they serve and a little less thought on their own Utopian images. Mt Um has been part of the the fabric of Santa Clara Valley since before the Board was created and should not be dismissed without careful consideration and appropriate input. Karen Asher United States 7/18/2012 Leave it alone. Eric Hermstad Campbell CA 95008 United States 7/18/2012 Historical landmarks need to be saved! I agree with Sidney Sun who says, "To me, it serves as the symbolic guardian to San Jose, watching over and protecting us. At one time, it literally served that purpose, part of a network of radar and anti-ballistic missile sites that protected the Bay Area during the Cold War. I'd like to see it preserved as part of this new park, so that San Jose continues to have Kelly Noftz San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 it's symbolic guardian, and hikers will be able to visit this memorial to the Cold War era." Well before the advent of GPS,the Mt. Um tower was a directional beacon for me. For those of us who have been here all of our lives, it is an icon and needs to be saved. Ugly? Maryann Colbeck San Jose CA 95127 United States 7/18/2012'NO! The windmills along Vasco Rd. are UGLY! We lived in PA for 30 years and remember going up to Umunhum with the kids. It holds good family memories for many people in the area as well as some historical memories. It think that it is important to keep structures like Susan Smith Escondido CA 92029 United States 7/18/2012 Um for all future generations. It is"a tie to the past". Harry Robinson San Jose CA 95148 United States 7/18/2012 The tower is a major Santa Clara Valley landmark. This landmark was a site that always told me that I was almost home whether I was flying or driving into SJ . I would consider it a loss to the area's landmarks if it was destroyed. We should be proud of it's service to keep America safe and to the men who worked there. History is lost whenever a landmark is removed as it is hard to image it even though photos Phil Harris Cupertino CA 95014'United-States, 7/18/2012 remain. Joyce Vernali San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 A part of significant local history+visible landmark Jo Anne Burton Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 7/18/2012 Because I don't want the tower torn down and want to preserve this local area. The radar tower is an icon in the history of the south bay and reminds us of the role our local residents played in defense of our homeland. if there is enough public sentiment years from now, it could be removed then. But, once it's taken down, it can't be put back up. Leave it there for now. 99.9%of our local citizens have never gotten to see it up close and Greg Jenkins United States 7/18/2012 personal. Keep it!! It's part of our history The Tower is an important part of almaden Valley's history. Why not install a telescope and Susan Hamilton San Jose CA 95120-1824 United States 7/18/2012 let people stargaze from atop the tower? This is an important part of history and needs to remain as a reminder of our past.Too quickly buildings and landmarks are destroyed and we are left with signage of what used to be. I personally am looking forward to the day where I can hike the mountain and see the Patricia Adams San Jose CA 95124'United States 7/18/2012 tower in person. Save the Cube! Central to all of my childhood memories growing up in San Jose's Almaden Valley was the anchor point in the horizon of looking for Mt. Umunhum and its iconic tower. It is unique Erik Khoobyarian San Jose CA 95110 United States 7/18/2012 and significant to our history and to the Almaden Valley. It must not be destroyed. Save the tower because IT IS a historical landmark that marks the days of the cold war. The Airforce put it up to help guard our coast from an enemy attack. It is one of the most prominante landmarks in Santa Clara County and relied on by many residents as site marker. Mark Montano Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Nothing put in it's place could add more than the tower. Jose Batto San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 This radar tower is a historical landmark in Santa Clara Valley and must be preserved. The radar tower is part of our history. I grew up in San Jose, and whenever we returned from a trip, when we spotted the tower we knew we were close to home. I would be sad to Barbara Davis United States 7/18/2012 see it torn down. As a life-long local hiker, I see Mt. Umunhum from many different angles. Without the distinctive cube, it's hard to identify. I don't care whether the structure is historic or not; it's Susan Barkan Mountain View CA 94043 United States 7/18/2012 a landmark and should be retained.A lookout post would be a lovely use for it. To help save this part of history of our valley and the freedom we worked for during the Louise Lincoln Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 7/18/2012 cold War era. I understand that asbestos is a problem, but recent news updates have revealed that there have been measures taken to rid the site of the asbestos,thereby making it SAFE to visit. Why tear down a huge part of our history when you can preserve it as a reminder that there was once a flourishing neighborhood on that military base? I'm sure that the people who grew up and lived on the site would be outraged if they knew what was happening to their Arley DeLaRoche' San Jose CA 95128 United States 7/18/2012 former homes! It is a significant part of the hills surrounding the Santa Clara Valley. We have lived in the Almaden area for over 33 years and,wherever we are in the valley, we always look for the Florence Cappelloni San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Mt. Umumhum radar tower. Saving the tower and finding a use for it has to be more cost effective--and better for San Christine Honda San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Jose I live in Alamaden and we all consider this tower to be a valuable landmark and reminder of Dennis Cannataro San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 the history of the Silicon Valley. I lived in the Santa Clara Valley for 40 years and I always looked for the tower and I would know where I was. Even now, when I come to San Jose, I look for the tower. I am also a Vietnam Veteran, and wholeheartedly believe Veterans service and sacrifice should always be honered any time possible. Most civilians have very little idea of what it is like serving in any branch of the military. Generally, it is not an easy life. This service needs to be honered. Galen Stallings Salinas CA 93906 United States 7/18/2012 Galen Stallings How many other instances do we have in San Jose, or the Bay Area as a whole for that matter,where we can directly point to our involvement in the Cold War? It's our monument to a by-gone era in American History. You can stand at almost any point in the south bay and see the tower on Mt. Umunhum. What needs to happen is to make it a site much like Mt. Hamilton Observatory. Don't bury our rich history, if we can preserve it in a Ryan Smith San Jose CA 95138 United States 7/18/2012 safe manner for the people and the environment. That tower is a landmark and has been here as long as I have been in this valley. As a kid growing up here, I remember listening to the radio and hearing the faint low pitch hum every several seconds letting me know it's still working to protect us. There is no viable reason to remove it. If that happens,then Mt. Umunhum becomes just another mountain Daniel Hendrix United States 7/18/2012 peak. So,why not remove the Lick Observatories while you're at it! Get real! It is so great to be able to have the tower to figure out where I am. It also is great to stand robbie Lamons San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 below the tower and hear the echo bouncing off it. The tower should remain forever! As I read in the MercuryNews Editorial section, put a huge American flag on the building with a bright light to shine at night. We couldn't be more Karen Stayrook San Jose CA 95135 United States 7/18/2012 proud of those that served in the military on that mountain and around the world! Grew up looking at it. It's an important part of the cold war history that needs to be Rob Davis San lose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 preserved. I want the tower to be saved in its entirety, not just partially. It DOES have historical significance,and it is a reminder that is visible to us on a daily basis of how important our Ann Mayers San lose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 country is to us. Kathryn Vortmann Sunnyvale CA 94086 United States 7/18/2012 Save the radar tower! I was born and raised in San Jose,and can't imagine looking up at that mountain without the Patricia Stackhouse San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 radar tower. I even miss not seeing the radar antenna revolving. I served for 3 years at the Cambria Air Force Station which was a Radar Station identical to Eugene Greenwood San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/18/2012 the one on Mt. Umunhum. It should be preserved as a Cold War Icon. San Jose and the (extended)Santa Clara Vallet have previous few distinctive landmarks.As they say,there's no "there"there. Removing this edifice will add to that malaise, [MO. I grew up in San Jose. Lived there for 40 years. I took pride in the fact that the Tower was Mark Clayton Menlo Park CA 94025 United States 7/18/2012 "ours." Leave it be. Please. I was born and raised in San Jose and as long as I can remember the tower has stood as a landmark that should stay for future generations should appreciate the way our country Denniy Brisbin San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 was protected when the tower was in full operation. Robert Wright San Jose CA 95112 United States 7/18/2012 1 grew_ up with the cube and have many, many fond memories of it. Lived in Valley for so many years and that tower is a landmark from all over. Maybe Caryl Swinyard San Jose CA 95135 United States 7/18/2012 sentimental, but still, part of our history. I grew up in San Jose. I always felt safer as a child knowing that the spinning radar on top of Mt. Umunhum was protecting us from potential threats. It would be a shame to see it go Ted Earle San Jose CA 95136 United States 7/18/2012 off the top of the mountain. William Hough San Jose CA 95112 United States 7/18/2012 This historic structure is a valuable relic of Silicon Valley's history and needs to be preserved. This tower is as much a landmark as the mountain beneath it. Think how nondescript Mt. James Gatenby San Jose CA 95111 United States 7/18/2012 Um will look without it? My husband and I can see it from our front yard-it's very close.We have lived in Almaden for 42 yrs and have seen it in different atmospheres-with clouds hugging it, sun bathing it, big moon and stars shining on it, rainbows over it, rain-storms surrounding it and even snow powdering it. It is always awe-inspiring and when we are coming back from out of town-its our'beacon'that we are almost home.As a matter of fact, I would like to see some kind of light on top of it, like some of the big city buildings have,that would make it even Terry Burleson san jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 more outstanding. I think we should clean it up, admire it, respect it. I say Keep It! Bruce Brennan San Jose CA 95117 United States 7/18/2012 It's been there my whole life. It should at least stay there till I'm gone. We actually have told our children to look for Mt. Umunhum as a sign of getting close to Doug Tissier San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 home. I remember touring the facility and seeing the computers bigger than our truck! What a sight. They were covered, of course, because the information was so sensitive;-) Plus, I was sad when they removed the radar itself. I liked seeing it up there. Removing the tower means we become even more generic as a place. leaving the tower(adding a radar Holly Hartman San Jose CA 95112 United States 7/18/2012 replica?)gives our valley a unique look. Once history is destroyed,that's it. We should preserve somethings for the next Lester Spring United States 7/18/2012 generation to observe and understand. I did software development on the SAGE system in the mid-sixties. We did many simulations using Mt. Unumum. carl held cupertino CA 95014 United States 7/18/2012 Keep It. It's important. I've lived most of my life here in San Jose. (Shoot- I still remember cherry orchards around my parent's house!) I've seen and admired the Mt. Umunhum tower all that time. It's a highly visible local landmark.that means I'm home in San Jose and all is right with the world. Colleen Friesen United States 7/18/2012 How can anyone even think of tearing it down? Without the tower Mt. Umunhum becomes another anonymous mountain and we lose prominent reminder of history. I don't think keeping it disrespects the Ohlone history of the mountain but instead serves as a segue to that part of the mountain's past. For me,wanting to know more about the tower and AFB is how I came to know of what came before. I live in view of tower and it's part of my daily ritual to look toward it every day and often ride up to the gate on Mt. Umhunhum Road to see it closer. I understand retaining the tower is not exactly in alignment with the district's mission but the public is their constituency and the public is speaking to keep it. Basim Taber:Thank you so much for all your work in making the public aware of AFB and its Steven Frehe San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 history! I've been in san jose my whole life and grew up up with looking at that radar tower. Now I can see it from my backyard real clearly can't wait to bring my son up to see it. It would be a phil barbaccia San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 horrible to tear it down. The tower is an important part of our history. James Foley Saratoga CA 95070 United States 7/18/2012 1 don't want future generations to dismiss/forget the Cold War. i Grew up and lived in San Jose 1956-1989. Miss the Radar"beep" on my stereo when living in South San Jose. First dove hunting trio on Mt. Umunhum in 1960's.A definite landmark that Jack Tonkin Roseville CA 95661 United States 7/18/2012 should be preserved! Debora Kaashoek San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 The radar tower is a South Bay ICON!!! It is a San Jose Landmark. Keeping it will both honor the people who were protecting our country as well as remind us of the folly of a war which could have destroyed both us and Alan Noyes San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/18/2012 the Soviet Union. Lucille David San Jose CA 95136 United States 7/18/2012 Please save the tower. It's part of our cold war history that needs to be preserved. Please keep the Mt. Umunhum tower for the next generations to appreciate the history of Laurel Wheeler San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/18/2012 our valley. I live near this historic site. I can't imagine the mountain without the radar tower. It's an , Lesley Pesek San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 important reminder to all who fought and fight to preserve American ideals. I grew up looking at that tower-it's part of my love of the valley before it grew up- leave it chip benson Sunnyvale CA 94089 United States 7/18/2012 you planning fools!!!!! I have lived in S.C.Valley 55 years and see the landmark as historically significant,and also a Daniel Dei Rossi Campbell CA 95008 United States 7/18/2012 welcome landmark I often see on the skyline. I grew up in San Jose and would miss seeing the tower on the western ridge. It is not only a Andy McNelly San Jose CA 95135 United States 7/18/2012 point of reference for me, but also a part of my memory of my youth. I'd hate to see it go. - MY BEST FRIEND'S DAD,A MAJOR IN THE AIR FORCE, IS BURIED THEIR BY HIS WISHES. HIS Quinn Linda Campbell CA 95008 United States 7/18/2012 SIX CHILDREN COMPLIED. I look at that tower everyday; It's a part of our history and our landscape in the Valley. It David Guven san jose CA 95111 United States 7/18/2012 would be greatly missed Lee Johnson San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 recognizable landmark Brent Johnson Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 7/18/2012 It's what I grew up with. It's part of our history. Tim Pratt Portland OR 97224 United States 7/18/2012 It's a cool tower...And a landmark Chuck Atchison United States 7/18/2012 It should remain there and be maintained Kristin Khoobyarian New York NY 10023 United States 7/18/2012 Grew up with the view of this landmark; it's our treasure! I believe it needs to be preserved as a monument and a museum,for the Ohlone Indians and Edward Jacklitch San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 the Cold War.Others have provided more eloquent reasons. Let them speak. I grew up in Santa Clara Valley and the tower has always been a popular landmark. It would Becky Yoder Los Gatos CA 95033 United States 7/18/2012 be a crime to take that away. The tower is a historically significant part of the Valley's history. It should be retained as a reminder to all of the Cold War when America stood strong and prevented Russian david burnham san jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 domination of the free world. Save the Cube! The radar tower perched on top of Mt Umunhum is a beacon here in the south bay and should be saved. It draws me to Mt Um whether I am returning to the valley by car or hiking the Priest Rock/Limekiln trails in Sierra Azul or simply seeing it tower above the valley on a neighborhood walk. It is important to preserve not only for its historical significance but also for its potential use in the future as a museum. There are many possibilities for what could be on display inside from a working simulation of what the radar towers operations were like to community outreach on the history of the Ohlone people and valley in general. Jeff Adams San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012'' Having lived in Santa Clara County for most of the Cold War era I can attest that the Mt. Umunhum Tower was the most visible and familiar sign of the County's role in defense, technology and communications during that period. The County's review process gave that David Sturrock Marshall MN 56258 United States 7/18/2012 fact short shrift and I strongly encourage the MROSD to correct this error. The tower is a part of Santa Clara Valley history. Having been born and raised in Santa Clara County,there are very few landmarks of significance left as the powers to be have lost sight Thomas Leipelt Santa Clara CA 95051 United States 7/18/2012 of keeping the valley's history. Make the right decision and keep the tower. It's been there all my life and shows me where South is so I always know where I am in the Gloria Dobbins San Jose CA 95123 United States 7/18/2012 valley. I would miss it terribly and so would my children. It identifies our'hummingbird hill." Having lived in Almaden for 40 yrs. my family remembers seeing the tower in operation. Every Christmas the broadcast from Mt. Uhm we waited for the Santa Clause spotting. Like the twin towers in NY It is a point of refence we look for when we return after a trip, willy fonda United States 7/18/2012 especially when we return by air. Served USCG Aleutian Island Umnak for Loran Navigation. Want those facilities to be Richard Schneider Sunnyvale CA 94087 United States 7/18/2012 preserved for history just like the radar tower at umumhum II Tom Pavel San Jose CA 95117 United States 7/18/2012 The tower is an important landmark that marks the hill and gives it its special identity. The tower is a good reminder of the Cold War. I attended a talk and slide show at History San Jose about the history of the tower and the military base on Mt. U. Because of the information I learned at this lecture, I would like to see the tower saved. It is part of our Lee McLaughlin Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 7/18/2012 Valley history. Save the Tower!J. Lee McLaughlin I was raised in the Bay area and lived in the Almaden Valley for the majority of my life! My parents and two brothers still live in San Jose also and we've always looked at the Tower Dave Burriesci San Diego CA 92108'United States 7/18/2012 with great pride. It is an iconic structure and has great meaning to many! The station is a part of my history growing up in Almaden. It has historical/geographical Aaron Burriesci San Jose CA 95125 United States 7/18/2012 significance. The tower is a valuable historical structure and gives character and unique appearance to Bob Moss Palo Alto CA 94306 United States 7/18/2012 the mountain. Mark Grimes Los Gatos CA 95032'United States 7/18/2012 1 love the tower. I wish the red and white rotating dish was still there too. I have lived in Almaden valley for over 30 years and have enjoyed the look up to see the tower I always know where I am if I see the tower It would be a shame to destroy the tower my father who is a retired Air force radar operator he flew in the pregrent coneys that helped with the towers defend the coast this is part of his legacy and it would be a shame to have it gone. I am sure that he is not the only retired air force radar tech thst has memories of signing into the tower as he flew in the airplane past the tower and patrolled the coast to defend us against the communist threat. Lillian Grimes San Jose CA 95120'United States 7/18/2012 Too many reasons but I'll try. 1) 1 grew up in the valley and no matter which direction we were traveling, once we saw Mt Umunhum, we had a beacon to guide us home. 2)The Cold War was a very significant part of world history. Mt Um was there to know we were protected from the threats of the era. 3) 1 miss the star that use to light up on the tower during the holiday season. It was visible throughout the valley and it gave a sense of"peace on Earth". Mike Boden San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 There's more .... please save the tower!! It is important that we preserve structures that represent historical importance of an area. In this case,the radar tower is a reminder of the Cold War and how close we were to a 3rd World War. Furthermore, it is a reminder to all Americans of the importance that our armed forces have played in preserving/protecting the U.S. Constitution and our rights as citizens. Finally,the radar tower provides a marker for geographic reference,similar to the Paul Pesek United States 7/18/2012 Lick Observatory on Mt. Hamilton. This is a piece of Almaden History. I grew up looking at this building which contributed to us winning the cold war. It is iconic and should be preserved for future generations to teach Stephen Khoobyarian Long Beach CA 90832 United States 7/18/2012 them the importance of the area in World affairs and defense of our great Nation. To preserve history-to remind those of us who lived through the Cold War and teach those Christine Burns United States 7/18/2012 that didn't. Alayne Yellum San Jose CA 95124 United States 7/18/2012 This tower reflects our times and cultural values. It needs to be preserved. 1 actively bike in the Santa Cruz mountains and appreciate seeing this cold-war relic peeking out over hilltops as I ride. Like the mercury smelter in Almaden Quicksilver or the Nike base in the Marin headlands,this tower is an artifact of our past that should be preserved for Charles Myers United States 7/18/2012 future generations. I grew up in the bay always seeing this historic tower. It'd be irresponsible to destroy it, and future generations wouldn't know about this tower and personnel who protected the bay jeffrey benson san jose CA 95125 United States 7/18/2012 area during the war. The tower is a icon of a bygone era. I see it everyday from my window. It needs to be saved as the tower, not bits and pieces. I would even love to seethe dish back on the roof. It needs to be open to the public as a museum to remind people of the past to protect the Emile Mestressaat San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/18/2012 future. Grew up in san Jose watching the radar go around. Always look up to the "bump"on every Steve Koppes Eagle ID 83616 United States 7/18/2012 trip home! It is critical to not lose visibility of the history of the Cold War and of the South Bay. Having something of this historical nature within the Open Space will provide exposure to recreational visitors who most likely would not know to search out a book to learn more Dale Benjamin Campbell CA 95008 United States 7/18/2012 about this period. "Those who forget(or never learn)the history are fated to repeat it!" I was an officer and weapons controller. There is a lot of history tied to that radar station William M Blalock Etowah NC 28729 United States 7/18/2012 and other secret functions. Keep it for history!! I grew up in San Jose in the 1960s and 70s, in the shadow of the hills mountains between us and Santa Cruz.The radar tower is ingrained in my childhood memory,and I don't see why we can't preserve the structure for 1) memories of baby boomers and others born earlier, and 2) use it for some other purpose, such as a storage facility,tourist trap, or(dare I say it) Raymond Rowe San Francisco CA 94102 United States 7/18/2012 housing. Seems weird to want to keep an ugly old brick tower. But I have memories of the place and even though I don't live in the area any longer- I still look up and smile when I see it there. Elizabeth Peddy Anginw CA 94508 United States 7/18/2012 I'd love to have it stay so I'll have the opportunity to tell my daughter my story about it. Thomas Buss San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/18/2012 Fond of this quirky landmark. It gives quick orientation to where you are in the south bay. On May 14th 2011, i was 300 ft from this tower before i was escorted of by sheriffs and rangers, i would love to LEGALY 1 day visit this monument and try to understand this place by actually being their in the flesh, not looking at pictures and watching videos. and for the rangers that told me i was endangering my life by possibly exposing my self to lead paint and Asbestos.well I am current living in a home that is 50 years old now, it as Asbestos Ceilings and lead painted walls, i have been lived here 8 years, still alive, and to the 1 million plus people who live within 30 miles of this box see it at least once a day,this radar tower is San Jose's Golden Gate, Our Landmark,the only Picture to the Cold war era thats still here. how can we as people learn from the past if the past keeps Nathan Dobrenz San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/18/2012 getting torn down? I was a long-time resident of south Almaden Valley. The tower is part of our history and has been a landmark of the community. It is also part of the story of how the Cold War related directly to the Almaden Valley and South Bay communities. It should remain and be utilized John Goldberg Capitola CA 95010 United States 7/18/2012 to interpret our history as part of the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve I was stationed at Almaden Air Force Station power plant in 1970 and 71 after Viet Nam. I believe that the trower is a very historical landmark, in fact, I think the dish should be replaced to its original configuration.The Bay Area has already lost to many historical stephen rutledge campbell CA 95008 United States 7/18/2012 landmarks. As long as I have been in San Jose, I have always seen the cube as a unique marker to orient me to where I am at any particular time and always looked at it as a unique part of the south Lars Bourne San Jose CA 95111 United States 7/19/2012 valley. The tower is a local landmark I've been looking at for over38 years. I want to hike to it and jack tolvanen san jose CA 95129 United States 7/19/2012 from it! If you're a veteran you understand the historic significance. If you are not a veterans the tower will help you to remember what veterans have done to preserve YOUR freedoms! Charles Berls San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/19/2012 -a Vietnam Vet, 1967-69 This tower is part of the history of Santa Clara Valley and the employees who sought to keep MADELIENE SCHEIMAN SAN JOSE CA 95125 United States 7/19/2012 our country safe. We should honor this site in its historical endeavor. I grew up in San Jose in the 60's, I'm amazed it still stands! A friend told me about this petition, and I thought when have I ever been asked to participate in the future of such a land mark. I can't lose the opportunity to make my feelings known.Save the Radar Tower! A Thomas Webb Portland OR 97214 United States 7/19/2012 cold war monument and a link to our past! Larry arnold United States 7/19/2012 its been there as long as i can remember. Mt. Umunhum serves as a reminder of what this valley went through during WWII and a tribute to those who protected us during that time. It also serves as a history lesson for our children.The tower is a good focal point for this valley. Mt. Hamilton still has the Patricia Huttlinger San Jose CA 95129 United States 7/19/2012 observatory. I grew up in South San Jose and the tower is part of local history. Always fond memories of the beep from the radar on the teachers' microphones when I was in high school,as well as watching the dish turn in time with the beeps. Mt. Umunhum would not be the same for most longtime San Jose residents without being able to look up and see the Cold War Kathy Styles Sunnyvale CA 94089 United States 7/19/2012 symbol which has been there for so long. John Ballard San Jose CA 95111 United States 7/19/2012 Civilization is nothing without history The Almaden AFS tower"IS" a significant piece of south bay history! I grew up in the south bay, I can still remember when their was a radar dish atop the "monolith". Destroying every piece of the Air Force's presence on Mt. Umunhum would be a great injustice to future Douglas Green San Jose CA 95136 United States 7/19/2012 generations! Keep the tower, at the very least. William A. Flood Los Gatos CA 95030-2317 United States 7/19/2012 1 encourage preservation of human history I grew up in San Jose,went to Leigh High and watched the radar spin always wanting to go up there and see it. Got close a few times, right before you get to the gate there was a dirt John Steely Medford OR 97504 United States 7/19/2012 road that took off to the left.We would take that road and party! Want to see that the cube remains intact for future generations to learn the history of the Craig Spink United States 7/19/2012 South Bay's contribution to the Cold War of the 60's. This tower is part of the history and landscape of Silicon Valley and marks home for many Mehrdaud Nlk-Ahd San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/19/2012 Almaden residents.We need to save it. The Cube is quite simply a part of the landscape. For my entire life, it has stood on Mt. Umunhum,conjuring up an air of mystery and irresistible attraction for the natives of Silicon Rob Johnson Stanford CA 94305 United States 7/20/2012 Valley. To tear it down would be to destroy a vital part of the Bay Area's past and present. I've seen the tower at least once every day for my whole life. I remember when it was operating. As a kid, I always thought it was just cool,and was heartbroken when the radar came down. I'm probably one of the few civilians who have been inside the tower, so, I have my own little time in history with the "Radar Station",as we called it. The Valley of Ray Elliott los gatos CA 95031 United States 7/20/2012 Heart Delight just wouldn't be the same without it guarding us from evil. to serve as a historical memoire and token of appreciation for those who served our country and were on stand by to protect us. This was a TIME IN USA HISTORY that should not be Rachelle Coronado El Cajon CA 92020 United States 7/20/2012 forgotten Kira Maximovich San lose CA 95120 United States 7/21/2012 Because I live here and think it is a historical landmark. Kristin Hess Langley WA 98260 United States 7/21/2012 Grew up in S1 and would look at cube daily from parents house. Greg Perrucci Los Gatos CA 95030 United States 7/21/2012 An important part of US history right here in the Bay Area that should not be forgotten Most countries have a strong sense of preserving their history.This tower is an important historical landmark concerning a certain era,which many people are already too young to remember.While it is appropriate to return the remainder of the mountain to its original state, and open it to the public,the tower should be preserved for its place in the history of the mountain.The ground floor may be made into a visitor center covering all facets of the mountain and its history.This monument will honor those who went before us in protecting us from all-too-real threats that fortunately were never realized. (I see it from the valley floor nearly every day.) Larry Kells Palo Alto CA 94303 United States 7/22/2012 fragments of history need to be preserved so that we can make informed decissions about Gloria Pariseau morgan Hill CA 95037 United States 7/23/2012 our future Elaine Little San Jose CA 95120 United States 7/23/2012 Almaden history!!!! May Goff San Jose CA 95128 United States 7/23/2012 When I see that tower, I know I'm home!It's our landmark. Please save it. This entire site is a part of our local history and to a greater degree the social and military history of our nation. In my opinion the entire site should be preserved as a monument to the cold war and renewed nuclear threat from such sources as Korea and Iran. Our descendants need to know and feel history to avoid repeating those negative components and to honor accomplishments. Preservation does not reduce the majesty of the views from the site,the sense of solitude Wayne Van Gundy Gilroy CA 95020 United States 7/24/2012 for today or the isolation of the residents who served their country at the facility I was stationed at Pt Arena AFS Ca. 72-73 as a radar tech. We also had a 24 tower and a 6 Richard Heister Girardville PA 17935 United States 7/24/2012 and 26 towers.A friend of mine was at Almenden at the same time and sent all this to me I have been looking at this tower most of my life and it is a good reminder of an important part of our history. In addition,the peak of Mt. Umunhum is not much too look at anyway Tim Zadel San Jose CA 95118 United States 7/25/2012 so the tower adds interest. Bryan Williams Sunnyvale CA 94086 United States 7/25/2012 Because it makes people curious. The radar tower is an important landmark that is identified with Mt. Umunhum in the same Luke Reimer San Jose CA 95125 United States 8/2/2012 way that the Lick Observatory is identified with Mt. Hamilton and should not be removed ... This tower represents a historic monument to the South Bay Area region. I have lived in San Jose my entire life and have fond memories of the cube on top of the hill. Mid-Peninsula,you NEED to clean this site up and open it to public access. DON'T commit a Al Leitch San Jose CA 95130 United States 8/2/2012 grand insult to the residents of the South Bay Area. It is such a unique landmark and it makes our area so special. Please keep this rare gift and Michael Underwood San Jose CA 95123 United States 8/2/2012 make it more accessible. I have dreamed of traveling to the tower since I was a little boy. I remember the dish spinning around and remember a lighted Christmas tree design added to the face of the tower every holiday season. I have made attempts at gaining access to the tower through proper channels but all were unsuccessful. If the tower is saved I will be able to fulfill my Sean Weitzel San Jose CA 95124 United States 8/3/2012 dream with my own son now. Jim Flanegin Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 8/3/2012 1 like the tower. Erick McCarthy Union City CA 94587 United States 8/3/2012 I'm a history buff.We should save some small part of this historical site. I believe the tower is a historical building.Just because its history is modern, it is not yet Gary Likhatchev San jose CA 95124 United States 8/3/2012 included in the official roll. Do not destroy your history! Charles Schenck San Jose CA 95118 United States 8/4/2012 Historical significance to Santa Clara The concrete tower had been there so long it had become a distinctive landmark for three generations. People don't want to just go to the top for a view, they want to go to the tower they have seen from afar for most of their lives.The tower is history and a unique Larry Herdman San Jose CA 95123-4849 United States 8/4/2012 destination that makes Mt. Umunhum so well known. Stop the hypocrisy- Make the open space district take popular opinion seriously-SAVE THE James Whitaker Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 8/4/2012 TOWER! Gary Ater Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 8/5/2012 It is a true cold war historical site that our next generations should learn & understand. Jeffrey Orum Sunnyvale CA 94087 United States 8/5/2012 It is part of the landscape and makes it easy to identify Mt. Um. Leave it in place. Why spend scarce resources to remove something that harms nobody and is valued by Dick Stephan Sunyvale CA 94087 United States 8/5/2012 many? William Palley San Jose CA 95125 United States 8/5/2012 White box is a landmark. Why are we so willing to forget recent history when its knowledge can help us make good Kay Banchero San Jose CA 95120 United States 8/5/2012 decisions today and wise plans for the future? Arieh Strod Cupertino CA 95014 United States 8/6/2012 It is an historic landmark!! George Dyer campbell CA 95008 United States 8/6/2012 worked on umunhum in summers as laborer for 3 yrs.with Gresham Constuction. I love the tower. It defines Almaden! Margaret Yost San Jose CO 95120 United States 8/8/2012 It must be saved! The tower is a significant icon of cold war history and a visual landmark for the South Bay Michael Cox Soquel CA 95073 United States 8/8/2012 area. Valerie Manfull Anchorage AK 99504 United States 8/9/2012 1 grew up in Almaden Valley.The radio tower is a historic landmark. It needs to be saved. Two reasons...this AF station is an historic relic of the Cold War era that was fundamental to our Cold War defenses. And it's a South Bay Area landmark cherished by those of us who Larry Fogelquist Scotts Valley CA 95066 United States 8/11/2012 have lived on both sides of the hill. I lived in San Jose, CA for 35 years before moving back to my home town 11 years ago. The Radar Tower was a popular place to visit for the boy scouts and is a wonderful historic place. Lynn Suckow Walla Walla WA 99362 United States 8/13/2012'The area wouldn't be the same without it. Definitely check out Edward Doherty's comments.The tower is an important piece of history 1 Jackson Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 8/13/2012 that should be preserved for future generations. As a previous Almaden AFS Commander,the tower would represent the dedicated effort Charles Aftosmis East Falmouth MA 2536 United States 8/17/2012 and sacrifices made by those who served at Almaden in protecting California and all This is a historic structure and is a testament to an important part of the history of both California and the nation. It stands as a symbol recognizing the sacrifice and dedication of Michael Aftosmis Foster City CA 94404 United States 8/17/2012 those who served this country to enable the life we enjoy today. Save Mt Um. because of its local signficance to the Cold War and its affects on our Santa Clara County residents. The historic tower needs to be evaluated for a possible landmark status at the local/regional/county level. The Mt Um tower needs to added to the County's Histioric Inventory register because of its role in protecting the west coast from attack. Mt Um Tower during the Cold War played the same role as Fort Point did during the Civil War. Bolth sites protected the Bay Area from attack. Michael Boulland San Jose, CA 95120 United States 8/17/2012 Sempervirens board member and Sierra Club hike leader. An historic site which is essential to our landscape. It is a visible reference point from almost all of the southern Santa Cruz stephen wyckoff santa cruz CA 95060 United States 8/18/2012 Mtns. So Keep It! The first sight I can say I truly remember in my life (1962 or 63)was looking out the kitchen window of the Cambrian Park House I grew up in and watching the antenna atop the radar tower go round and round. That Tower is as much a part of history as any thing before it was and any thing that comes after will be. I do not think it is ugly at all. It is a part of Mt Charles Nehring San Jose CA 95120 United States 8/18/2012 Umunhum .A special place for sure. The first sight in my life that i can say I truly remember(1962 or 63) is looking out the kitchen window of the house I grew up in and watching the antenna atop the radar tower go round and round.With all due respect for the history of Umunhum before the AAFS was built, I will say that Radar Tower and Base have become as much a part of the Mountains history as any thing ever was or will be.The real shame here is how poorly its caretaker for the last 25+years has performed its job. Deliberately allowing and encouraging the base to be torn up thus creating the hazardous conditions such as the "free asbestos"that existed until recently.There would have been no need for most of the millions already spent if they had not encouraged the Deterioration of the base in an attempt to extort Millions of dollars from federal and local governments to tear it down. Most print on the subject of Almaden Air Force Station say the Radar Tower is five stories tall. I know this is trivial and correct me If I am wrong.The Radar Tower has Five and one half levels or floors but it's height is actually equivalent to a ten story building and that is 8/18/2012 with out its radar antenna. Chuck Sunder MN MN 55416 United States 8/21/2012 1 was stationed at 719th AC&W Sq in Sparrevohn,Alaska in 1955. the 728th is being decommissioned here at Egli AFB. Radar hill is scheduled to be leveled soon and the radar tower on Eglin will come down some time soon. It will be like they were never here.So to me things have to stay as a reminder of historic events and accomplishments made by this unit. We won't have that option. So I want to help other James Pennington Crestview FL 32539 United States 8/22/2012 organizations to have an option. John Freeman Florence AL 35633 United States 8/23/2012 Historical Military/Peace Keeping Significance! Charles W Fitzgerald Texarkana AR 71854 United States 8/23/2012 Because itis one of our lastpieces of History and deserves protection. Ken Taylor Colorado Springs CO 80911 United States 8/23/2012 1 am a USAF MSG. Retired and people in the future should see these Historical Items. We need to preserve this historical landmark to honor those who served there and around Charles E. Grant Wetumpka AL 36093 United States 8/23/2012 the world to protect our freedom during the Cold War Era. i As an Air Force Vetran that served on numerous Air Force Radar Sqdns in the 1960 s and 1970's I feel that this previous radar sqdn location should be perserved to remind us of the protection provided the United States by numerous individuals who provided the 24 hour constant lookout on lonely mountain tops so that no other country could attack the United Roy Killion Green Forest AR 72638 United States 8/24/2012 States during the many years of the cold war period. Although I did not serve at this Radar Station I did serve at three other Stations in the states. Kenneth Vahrenkamp Allen TX 75002 United States 8/24/2012 It serve as an historical reminder for all of us who did serve and maintain those sites. Jon Meador Fresno CA 93727 United States 8/24/2012 It is part of our military tradition. Debra Herr Los Gatos CA 95033 United States 8/25/2012 I've spent time up there as a child and I can see it from my home! I am a Air Force Radaar Vet. It's important to be able to bring family to visit and see what my John Falk Bella Vista CA 96008 United States 8/25/2012 life was like on a site As a radar vet I believe it is important to keep this piece of history for future generations. Craig Jones Hayward CA 94544 United States 8/26/2012 Marin has it's Nike Base,the Southbay needs it's Radar Site! The former base is from a critical era in American History, and a reminder of deterrence and the price of freedom. Frankly, if other former base buildings can be used by the park district, those should be preserved too. For example, maintenance yards, recreation facilities,and Nicholas Byram San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/2/2012 other base buildings that could work as a visitor's center or a base museum. Linda Houston San Jose CA 95117 United States 9/5/2012 To preserve the history of this site. Michael Allen San Jose CA 95126 United States 9/5/2012 1 have an interest in cold war history and historical sites in general. First Perry Ropp Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/6/2012 Listened to Basim Jaber talk History need to retain the physical aspects of our history, landmark-visual this is close to a Tim Mitchell San Jose CA 95518 United States 9/10/2012 city. Not remote rural location. It is a part of our history we should not forget. Too often historic places are leveled to make room for"progress"and onl later do we appreciate their significance. In the 60's nuclear Y pp g Kevin Haley San Jose CA 95110 United States 9/10/2012 war was a real threat and this installation did its part to lessen the risk. Mt. Ununhum was my home from Feb 1968 thru Nov 1968. Came there from Japan and left JULIAN KARDAS GRAHAM WA 98338-0851 United States 9/11/2012 there for Vietnam.Although it was a short time lots of memories were left there. Andrea Thomas Fresno CA 93705 United States 9/12/2012 It's a land mark. I always new that I was close to home when I saw the tower. I i AN AREA LIKE THIS DESERVES MORE THEN OPEN SPACE STATUS.THE POTENTIAL IS MUCH GREATER. YES HIKING TRAILS.A TRAMP RIDE AND A VIEW OF THE VALLEY WITH A RESTAURANT TO BOOT.A JEWEL FOR ARTIST AND A PLACE TO JUST SIT,WITH A COFFE OF DRINK JUST TO DREAM OVER THE WORLD AND FORGET YOUR PROBLEMS WHERE THE DIN OF SOUND ALLOWS YOUR IMAGINATION TO UNWIND AND THE BREEZE TO COOL YOU OFF FROM THE VALLEY HEAT.THIS IS A SPOT WITH MORE POTENTIAL THEN EVEN I CAN JERRY PATRIGNANI SAN JOSE CA 95118 United States 9/12/2012 IMAGINE...JERRY PATRIGNANI. Jill Dumont Prescott AZ 86305 United States 9/14/2012 It has been there all my life and should be an historical site for what it stood for and meant I was born in San Jose and remember driving up that way. It is an Icon and deserves to still Carol Lazetera Manteca CA 95336 United States 9/14/2012 stand Holly Beth Cadiente San Jose CA 95112 United States 9/14/2012 history Mt Umunhum is a land mark that reminds of how our valley was once protected during the mark schroeder San Jose CA 95112 United States 9/14/2012 cold war and earlier.Those who forget the past ....... It has been a delightfully quirky addition to the skyline of south bay for decades and will be Jonathan Marinaro Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 9/14/2012 an amazing place to hike to and visit with such a mysterious history! Cordell Kintner San Jose CA 95122 United States 9/14/2012 It is an important national landmark, it should not be destroyed. There is so much history to the Mt Umunhum Tower, and seeing it as I walk out the door every day always brings a smile to my face. Please do no remove my favorite San Jose Clare Gordon San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/14/2012 landmark! Pat Wagstaff San lose CA 95119 United States 9/14/2012 It's an important landmark and should remain. The Umunhum Radar tower has been my view from my front yard since I was a small child. I am in my fifties at that time. The tower is a landmark for the south bay. It survived the Loma Prieta earthquake.The tower is part of our history and can provide educational benefits for more generations to come.The tower should stay in place.There is room for the tower and there can still be open space use around it. The tower could be used for a Anne Fields San Jose CA 95118 United States 9/18/2012 command center for emergencies.There is no need to tear it down. William Hough San lose CA 95112 United States 9/19/2012 This is an important piece of local history and should not be destroyed. It is a very important historical building. It symbolizes a significant period in our history. If you value history,then let it stand. If you don't,then tear it down. I say, specific monuments Eric Serdahl Sunnyvale CA 94089 United States 9/20/2012 have value beyond the dollars, let it stand. I grew up in Cambrian Park area of San Jose, and saw the radar tower from my front garden every day. It was always off limits, and defined a generation of folks like me growing up in the Cold War era. It's a part of history that I lived every day of my life. It should be saved for the same reason that the buildings on Angel's Island in SF Bay were saved when writing from Chinese immigrants was found inscribed on the walls.The radar tower may not have poetry in Chinese script carved into its walls, but it is an historical and cultural landmark like no other in this area. It could be turned into a cool educational center--like exists at Arastradero Park and Alpine Pond. I can't begin to understand why the Mid Peninsula Open Space District wishes to opt for a "scorched earth" approach to erasing this monument of important Silicon Valley history!There are no other similar monuments to this era,and it Peter Tommerup Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/20/2012 would increase visitors to this park! Because it is just plain cool looking when you look up their on the skyline ridge! Rawley Douglas San Jose CA United States 9/20/2012 The city of San Jose has no skyline, Let's at least keep this tower alive! Spent three years on that Hill.Served to keep the Russians at bay during the "Cold War."The building is now a symbol of a place in that history.The weather was sometimes violent up there.We lost a roof from our house during a thunderstorm. Not a single shingle was ever found. I have never seen a place whith such a variety of animals: snakes, bobcats, boar hogs,foxes, deer, and more. It snowed up there sometimes. "Nostalgia" is the name of that tune whenever I think of that mountain top a.We did waht we could to do our duty up there; many of us were raising a family at the same time.We all recall the houses and buildings up there, One should remain as a symbol of all of the personnel who manned and Hal Wilson Taylorsville UT 84129-6004 United States 9/20/2012 kept the place organized and functional to help keep peace . Mary Humphrey Gilroy CA 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Historical preservation. gael hall bampbell CA 95008 United States 9/21/2012 Because it is a part of our history and is an iconic landmark of our bay area. JOAN BUCKLEY GILROY CA 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Part of the history of the valley Dushan Gasich San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/21/2012 Historic value. Rich Rohme Watsonville CA 95076 United States 9/22/2012 This is part of our history and should be saved to teach our children our history. This tower is a historic landmark and relic of the cold war and should be preserved. Without Frederick Berger San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/23/2012 it how will I find my way home! I am a long time resident(30+years) of the Bay area, a MROSD volunteer,and an avid open space user. The Cube is a part of our local landscape and history that I would like to see preserved. I encourage the District to explore options on retaining the Cube rather than Cass Kalinski San Jose CA 95128 United States 9/24/2012 tearing it down. Brad Gyger Los Gatos CA 95032-4026 United States 9/24/2012 Living in Los Gatos, it is an important part of history the public should be able to enjoy. The cube atop Mount Umunhum is a part of local history that affected our whole country. It's also an area landmark that we all look to on clear days. My young child can spot it from all over the valley. Open it as a visitor center,and it will bring many people to the top of "Mt Um,"where they can learn about its importance and also how to help protect both Diane Main San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/24/2012 historical places and open spaces. Larry McColloch Santa Clara CA 95054 United States 9/24/2012 It is a valley land mark that I've been raised with. I Lance Kuempel Livermore CA 94550 United States 9/24/2012 The Radar Tower is a part of Bay Area history. It should be preserved for future generations. Ken Helwig Scotts Valley CA 95066 United States 9/24/2012 Historical significance and educational purposes Mark Lyons San Jose CA 95136 United States 9/24/2012 This is part of this valleys history! I was born and raised in San Jose and can remember when the tower still operated.Save it Tom Pecota St Helena CA 94574 United States 9/24/2012 please. The radar tower is one of the few landmarks in the south bay. Growing up in San Jose,there were three main visual landmarks that I used to look at across the valley. Those were the original blimp hanger at Moffet field,the observatory on Mt. Hamilton, and the radar tower on Mt Umunhum. Now that the blimp hangar is being dismantled it would be a tragedy to Scott Johnson San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/24/2012 also destroy the radar tower. Craig Jones Hayward CA 94544 United States 9/24/2012 Air Force radar vet. It is history. But also,with it there, it explains why the mountain top was decapitated. If it is Doug Blasco Livermore CA 94551 United States 9/24/2012 removed,then rebuild the mountain to it's previous state. Jarda Skyba San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 1 live here George Leavell San Jose CA 95119 United States 9/25/2012 1 am a USAF veteran I feel a part of its history having patrolled those mountains for years and forming friendships Bob Hedgpeth Scotts Valley CA 95066 United States 9/25/2012 with staff there. The Almaden AFB deserves preservation as a part of our bay area history, much like the Martin Knutson Los Gatos CA 94022 United States 9/25/2012 hangar at Moffet field. Joseph Kerley anchorage AK 99504 United States 9/25/2012 as an ex-San Jose resident,the tower is a symbol of home. Richard Ornellas San jose CA 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Historical preservation Michael O'Halloran Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 9/25/2012 Historic landmark Having been involved in the cold war for many years, it would be a shame to lose the tower. Bob Peterson San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 1 enjoy looking at it everyday from my home. Theodore Olson San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 We live where we can see it and feel it is a National Monument The tower is a landmark for people in the valley. Without the tower, most people wouldn't Terry Johnson Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/25/2012 know where Mt. Umunhum is. It's a part of our history and our heritage.Save the tower! Earl Stutes San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/25/2012 1 enjoy hiking in the area. When I look out my bedroom window and see the tower, I see an important historical icon that reminds us of perhaps the most dangerous era of US history. We are better off today due to the men and women that served at facilities such as Almaden AFS. The tower needs to remain as a memorial to all who served and as a historical icon of how the United States Charles Smith San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 has progressed. I value the tower's historical significance, and don't want that to be forgotten. It is a landmark in the valley, and I often point it out to visitors. My father was in the RCAF in Canada, based in Newfoundland during WWII. He was watching our east coast while the people in this tower were guarding the west coast, so it has personal meaning to me. Kirby Cove,facing the Golden Gate bridge, has bunkers of some sort,without a visitor centre, as well as camping and picnic facilities, and it adds to the interest of the site. If you know the Marion MacKinnon Cupertino CA 95014 United States 9/25/2012 history of an area,your understanding is that much richer. It is an important part of our valley's history and should be preserved for future generations. Also, I can see the tower out my kitchen window and look for it every morning when I'm Todd Haney San Jose CA 95118 United States 9/25/2012 having my coffee. Financially...Very Expensive to remove it. Some contractor is licking his chops for that contract. Emotionally: Grew up with this. Wish they could re-install the dish. Philisophically: Provides a history of the steps taken to protect our country. Looks like it Steve Larson San Jose 95136 Senegal 9/25/2012 would be a great hang glider launch point eventually. Bill Shoenhair Cupertino CA 95014 United States 9/25/2012 The historical properties of the site should be preserved for our children Arthur Blackwell Evergreen CO United States 9/25/2012 The SFBA is hell bent on destroying it's history. Dave Ganser Pleasanton CA 94588 United States 9/25/2012 The tower is an important landmark in SC County and a reminder of the Cold War I grew up in Almaden Valley in the late 60's and early 70's looking at the tower every morning prior to my walk to Henderson school. My dad reminded me we always had an DAN MCFARLAND san jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 angel looking out for our welfare. he was referringing to the tower and the job it held Jack Longley Los Gatos CA 95030-4340 United States 9/25/2012 Historic Sight Herb Mesler San Carlos CA 94070 United States 9/25/2012 History that should be preserved Back in 1969,while attending Leland High School, I visited the Alamaden AFS, because I Andrew Hyslop Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/25/2012 dated the station commander's daughter! Great place, had lots of fun and good memories. steve hein San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/25/2012 1 love hiking in quicksilver park with the old tower in the background judi kelleher San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 It's an Almaden Valley landmark!! Uly vonHuene San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Let's not destroy apiece of Bay Area history. when I see it I know I'm home. We should be proud of it, and not get rid of a landmark. sandra cannizzaro san jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 landmark As a long term resident of Santa Clara County I have meny memories of the cube.Some good, some not so good. I have hiked the hills before and after the cube was"on duty" and I recall saome problems flying model airplanes in its shadow. it does have historical significance and our society is too inclined to forget the past. John Nast Gilroy CA 95020 United States 9/25/2012 John Nast Maryrose Hutchinson San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 This is a piece of our history that should be allowed to remain for future generations. I see it every day, someday I hope to be able to Mt bike to it. It would be ashame to have Drew Marsh San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 such an iconic symbol disappear. It's been part of the landscape since I can remember. It served a historical purpose and Katherine Bussey Fayetteville, 28306 United States 9/25/2012 should remain there as a reminder. vernon hyde san jose CA 95125 United States 9/25/2012 It is part of the history of the area John Dvorak San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/25/2012 1 served in Army Air Corps when tower was built. The Radar Station is part of our history. I want to always know that the Tower is there. I Karen Buesing Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/25/2012 love seeing it each day. Keep it always. - It is a historic landmark that sets that hill apart. I always enjoy telling visitors the story of it. Susan Johnson Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/25/2012 When I'm stuck in traffic, heading south on 85, 1 enjoy looking at it! Richard Kegley San Jose CA 95119 United States 9/25/2012 It's part of our city, state, and country history. It is important to preserve a part of history. Making this into a visitor's center is a brilliant Cissy Brazil San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/26/2012 idea. I back Sam Drake totally. Gregory Farris San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/26/2012 History for our area Constructed in 1962,the tower"supported a 85.5-ton General Electric model AN/FPS-24 long range search radar antenna "sail" used to detect incoming hostile aircraft during the Cold War." Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower 15 a piece of Santa Clara Valley history AND U.S. Jeanne Dittman San Jose CA 95132 United States 9/26/2012 history that should be preserved. I grew up in Campbell. The Tower was a vista point on my inner horizon. A young boy, gazing and dreaming, long before Silicon Valley. I still take great delight in gazing at that Gary Fischer San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/26/2012 horizon and that Tower. Steve Sawyer Menlo Park CA 94025 United States 9/26/2012 It is an important landmark for my close friend, Gary. I've cycled to the top many times over decades always with the Tower in sight. Further-it's a Cold War relic that worthily reminds Silicon Valley that technology entrepreneurship is not David Evans Santa Cruz CA 95060 United States 9/26/2012 the whole story here. Larry Przywara Mountain View CA 94040 United States 9/26/2012 Historical significance. Brian Kelleher San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/26/2012 It is an Almaden landmark and the way I know where I am It looks interesting, I'd like to hike there and see it. Why tear down something that people are used to and causes no harm? It's like a piece of Martin Junkar San Jose CA 95118 United States 9/26/2012 rock or an old castle on the hilltop. Lisa Hettler-Smith San Jose CA 95112 United States 9/26/2012 This is an Historic Resource, and unique to our valley and it's history. I grew up in Campbell and have always enjoyed looking up at mountain and seeing the Jim Russell Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Radar tower--it welcomes you back home to the area. I have lived in the Valley for over 50 years. This is as much a part(or a bigger part)than Don DeHart San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/26/2012 some of our other historical landmarks or buildings I came to Santa Clara Valley at age 14 years. This landmark looked amazing and technical to Christine Russell Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/26/2012 me. It says this is a happening place to be! Matt Wheeler Los Altos CA 94024 United States 9/26/2012 childhood memories Kristin Khanna Ponte Vedra Beach FL 32082 United States 9/26/2012 Why dismantle this reminder of those who served It is a great landmark of history for the Santa Clara Valley. Much like the firewatch tower on Mt Tam, it is an inspiration to those of us who grew up looking up at it over the years. It should be made into some sort of historical site similar to the firewatch on Tam. Why throw away a great piece of history like that. The national parks did not do that with the gun emplacements on the Marin Headlands, why then should this be torn down? I say fix it John Havens Windsor CA 95492 United States 9/26/2012 up for future generations to learn from. madeline wollbrinck san jose CA 95124 United States 9/26/2012 its the one thing my grandpa used to talk to me about. Ruth Hewson Magnolia TX 77355 United States 9/26/2012 It is important to preserve historical items in the South Bay. - I grew up in Campbell and San Jose.The cube has been on the skyline for almost as long as I can remember. When the Air Force abandoned it,we were lead to believe it would be Tom Wight San Jose CA 95111 United States 9/27/2012 cleaned up and opened up to the public as a museum.That needs to occur. Too many old landmarks have fallen. We should be able to save those that are important to us. Whenever I'm away from home and flying into San Jose upon returning I see that Carol Zuvella Milpitas CA 95035-6510 United States 9/27/2012 landmark and smile because it says I'm almost home. I grew up with this radar station, have been up there many times when i was young and Mae Lin Bishop San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 have used it as landmark-knowing I was near home. It is a historical landmark that has been here since I came to San Jose 50+years ago...it Toh-Bee Syn San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 would be a shame to tear it down. Kathleen Norman Pendleton OR 97801 United States 9/27/2012 It's a landmark and should be preserved! I was born and raised in Almaden and that tower was a hallmark of my childhood. Today it serves as a vivid reminder of the Cold War for an entire generation that has no idea what Elizabeth Christenson Greenbrae CA 94904 United States 9/27/2012 that meant. It should stay, and have status& protection as a historical relic. Robert Dietrich Richmond CA 94801 United States 9/27/2012 Because of it's historic significance. Judi Souza San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/27/2012 History&beauty Everything eles is being taken away from us in the last 4 years;the landmarks of our country Gaye McClure Twin Falls ID 83301 United States 9/27/2012 must be saved!! This has always been what my siblings and I learned to look for when we were little and had to point which way was home. After going away to school in LA,when I would drive back and saw it coming up 101 and looping around 85 1 knew I was home. Don't tear down "The Erin Kelleher San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Box"!! Please! Sandy& Brian Serpa San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/27/2012 It is a significant landmark in SJ. My grandparents homesteaded the Almaden Valley(Athenour) and the radar tower was like a watch tower over the valley for many many years. It is a signature of the valley and one Jeff Singewald Mountain View CA 94040 United States 9/27/2012'that should be retained for historical significance. Mireia Barbero Barcelona 8002 Spain 9/27/2012 It is a landmark. JIM DONEGAN Sa nlose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012'It's our landmark Mt. Umunhum and the air station has a historic value to all of us who have been in the area LORETTA DEAGEN Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/28/2012 over the past 50 years. Thomas Mangano Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/28/2012'Important to the valley Kendra Hershey Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/28/2012 1 live nearby and enjoy spotting this landmark from hikes near and far. Life long resident of SJ,visited the AFB as a child,visit the MROSD area regularly and believe the building may have long term value as a Visitor Center to house history about the AFB, Greg Azevedo San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/28/2012 Ohlone, Natural History and SC Valley history. Sandra clark Fremont CA 94539 United States 9/28/2012 A landmark for years of my home in the foothills below it. Larry Bursch San Jose CA 95125-5043 United States 9/28/2012 Historic sight in San Jose The Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower is an important historical artifact from an important sociopolitical period in global history. It provides a striking physical reference for teaching the future how the cold war was played out and how it affected the people during that time. It is a period devoid of visual reference, mainly because it was a confrontation played outside the view of the world.This alone should justify the preservation of the radar tower. But of even greater importance is the historical value to the South Bay.This plain, simple, concrete tower oversaw the transition from an agrarian valley which was the world leader in the plentiful harvest of foods to the world leader in the harvest of ideas.The military- industrial complex,which saw it's genesis in the Cold War,created this tower out of the international escalation of threat and defense. Without passing judgement on the moral or political correctness of military-industrial complex, it produced the confluence of people who planted the seeds of intelligence, innovation, creativity and commerce which defines the South Bay today. The loss of the tower, while a success to entropy,would be a failure to the recollection of the past, understanding of the present and the hope of the future of this great region. This tower is the South Bay's link between the past, present and future. Michael Hazarian San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/28/2012 want this to remain as a reminder to everyone that for a lot of people and for a long time this kept us safe from an enemy that wanted us destroyed (no longer) now we have another group of counties that want to distroy us. I wish it was as easy to find them before they Daniel Biesterveld San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/28/2012 attack us . The Tower is a symbol of the defense of the country with earlier technology, a reminder that even the West Coast was attacked by submarine launched fire balloons in WWII, and Ken Miller San Jose CA 95125-3341 United States 9/29/2012 watching the seas was critical to the mainland's defence. Doug Miller portland OR 97213 United States 9/29/2012 statement of history.without history we'll just do it again the same way. Tabitha Evans San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/29/2012 1 would like to see it stay!!!! Matt Wales San Jose CA 95132 United States 9/29/2012 The mountain will never be the same or historic without the building. No Brainer! The mountain has signified peace and safety to people in this valley throughout centuries, including the one immediately previous.Throughout my lifetime,the tower one the mountain has been an icon as well as a reference point . My parents explained why it was there,and later, I understood on my own the significance of its dismantling.The Ohlone name of the mountain on which it stands has always part of image of that high, beautiful, long inaccessible place.When the public can at last walk on those grounds, we should be able to see the tower that provided safety, as well as the mountain top that has always Loureen Giordano San Jose CA 95110''United States 9/30/2012 called people to look up. Hans and Diane Ernst Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/30/2012 monument like others on mountaintops in Europe. It enhances the sight. Sharon F.iekowsky Los Altos CA 94024 United States 9/30/2012 Historical preservation Neal Weinstein San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/30/2012 1 do extensive hiking&the tower is like beacon that can be seen all over the bay area. Because there few, if any, of these reminders of the role of the USAF in the "Cold War." Please consider maintaining this entire site. Donations would probably be available to Joseph Hennequin Boise ID 83709 United States 10/1/2012 preserve it. I think, in addition to all the park/visitor center type stuff,there is a certain reverence to the William Storck San Jose CA 95130 United States 10/1/2012 place (been there many times).Would you bulldoze the Battle Field at Fredericksburg? The tower is historical and an important local landmark. Marin Headlands integrates Cathy Baird San Carlos CA 94070 United States 10/1/2012 batteries; Mt. Um can integrate cold war history with open space. I've always seen the box from down in the valley,and I've always wanted to go to see it in Dan Summers San Jose CA 95118 United States 10/2/2012 person (legally, of course) Mt. Umunhum represents a piece of San Jose history and visually, it is a striking city landmark that distinguishes our city from others. Mount Umunhum also reminds us of a time when there was potential turmoil that could've arrived to San Jose but luckily never Rachel Ramirez San Jose CA 95125 United States 10/2/2012 did,and by moving forward, it always help to look backward. jamy tays brentwood CA 94513 United States 10/3/2012 my uncle requested it. SALVADORE SERIO SAN JOSE CA 95118 United States 10/3/2012 1 FELT SAFE AS A CHILD KNOWING THAT WAS UP THERE Julie Anne San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/4/2012 The "box" is a symbol of home to anyone who lives in Almaden! It is an important historical and locational landmark for the South Bay region. Without the joshy varghese san jose CA 95119 United States 10/4/2012 tower,the peak will just be another"lump" in a series of mountain lumps Carmen Sanders San Jose CA 95130 United States 10/4/2012 It is History...military history David Hicks Sunnyvale CA 94085 United States 10/5/2012 It Is a South Bay landmark and part of the area's history. It has always been a staple landmark of the south bay. I grew up with it being ever present Andy Hamilton San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/6/2012 and it has been a point of conversation, myth, and legend throughout my life. It's a historical piece of history that you can see for a long ways.And when someone asks Aaron Andrade San Jose CA 95136 United States 10/6/2012 what it is you can tell them and remind them what we went thru Julian Gomez Palo Alto CA 94303 United States 10/6/2012 My country's history. Vladimir Gorshkov San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/7/2012 the tower resemblesAlmaden and adds a sense of pride and history It's a Bay Area landmark, a historical building, and should be made into an observation Scott Lesch San Jose CA 95112 United States 10/7/2012 tower and interpretive center. was born here in 1943 and over the years watched as orchards,Victorian homes, canneries and other irreplaceable things were torn down. Michael Bena San Jose CA 95136 United States 10/8/2012 Please save this monument! Sharon Nienhaus Ca. CA United States 10/9/2012 It's the valley's landmark. - Steve Sandel Oakland CA 94601 United States 10/11/2012 This was my beacon to find my way home as a kid ---SAVE IT, KEEP IT... Bernice Luis san jose CA 95128 United States 10/11/2012 1 grew up in the bay area and hate to lose all our landmarks Mark Mangin San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/11/2012 Historical Landmark I and hundreds of others in the uSAF served at similar radar sites, many in extremely remote locations, keeping this country safe during the "cold war". There is very little left to remind Phillip Knox Los Angeles CA 91392 United States 10/11/2012 folks of our service. Please don't destroy one of the few remaining. joel cohn seattle WA 98136 United States 10/11/2012 historical nature of this facility I am a radar station veteran and this is part of our cold war history. These stations keep our Bruce Taylor Belgrade MT 59714 United States 10/11/2012 country free. Im a huge advocate for historical preservation,a history major, and specifically interested in ryan berbick San Jose CA 95148 United States 10/12/2012 the Cold War, among other things. This is another part or section of the United States Military History that could become a thing of the past. One must not let this happen, our US Military History is just as important Harry Larrabee Sr Ellsworth ME 4605 United States 10/12/2012 as what will be tomorrows history. Me and my family were stationed there twice and loved it. People should be able to see Kenneth Blum Hillpoint WI 53937 United States 10/12/2012 how we lived and worked to protect our country during the cold war. Grew up looking at the tower everyday, its the best South Bay landmark. My brother even Chris Matthiessen San jose CA 95124 United States 10/12/2012 has a tattoo of the hills with the tower on it. It is not bothering anyone,except for somebody who thinks it should not be there; in actuality-that person should not be there or here! It is a piece of our past and it is very cool Rene Rodriguez San Jose CA 95128 United States 10/12/2012 looking! It is a large part of our local history,especially during one of the most critical moments in the security of this nation. Nearly every other landmark of signifigance has been destroyed or dismantled, relegated only to the memories of those who are old enough to remember. There are few visual reminders to show our children that link our collective histories Jeffrey McClanahan Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 10/12/2012 together. Preserving open space for the future already includes changes done by previous occupants. Does the open space district remove all the eucalyptus trees planted by the Spanish or Chris Sulek San Jose CA 95126 United States 10/12/2012 Mexicans? Anthony Misch San Jose CA 95125 United States 10/12/2012 Historical significance; landmark. Jody Berbick San Jose CA 95148 United States 10/13/2012 Historical Robert Leibb rand San Jose CA 95112 United States 10/13/2012 It's a landmark seen for miles never to be seen again. cathleen reno San Jose CA 95112 United States 10/13/2012 history preservation This is a part of our history. Without it,this would be just another mountain top, one of Gordon johnson Santa Cruz CA 95060 United States 10/14/2012 hundreds in the bay area. Its a real piece of the cold war& its a part of history that should be shared with generations of the future. Better than a history book about the subject. Angeline King Mountain View CA 94040 United States 10/14/2012 Not to mention its a pretty awesome piece of architecture. Jill P Bohn San Jose CA 95127 United States 10/14/2012 It is part of the valley history The South Bay has so few visual landmarks, it would be a shame to lose this one. Also,the Cold War caused a lot of the development of this area. I like the idea of making it a museum Brian Gurney San Jose CA 95139 United States 10/14/2012 to remember and explain that time period. I love visiting walking path near the top of Mt. Umunhum. Having the tower peer down at our valley is a majestic site.As someone "lucky" enough to visit the tower, I urge Open Space District to restore and open the tower for public view so many others gain enjoy the Jeffrey Cianci San Jose CA 95119 United States 10/14/2012 impressive site. Travis Watkins San Francisco CA 94132 United States 10/15/2012 It is one of the only San Jose Landmarks i ve lived in Almaden since 1972 and I've always wanted to visit the Cube.Ther are so many possibilities: Museum, restaurant,zip-line base. recreation center,a giant sculpture lit at Michael Lambert San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/15/2012 night(imagine water cascading down on all 4 sides lit up at night) This is the first thing I see when I fly home from school. It wouldn't feel completely like Nishant Singh Pittsburgh PA 15213 United States 10/15/2012 home otherwise. Craig Peasley Sunnyvale CA 94085 United States 10/15/2012 historical relevance to the Bay Area I saw this on the news and it intrigued me. I grew up out in Concord and it was pretty plain and boring. We had a small base atop Mt. Diablo which had cool views, but no real historical significance. We also had the Naval Weapons Stations Base,which was quite creepy and had dark energy I felt. Now that I live in a better part of the Bay Area, I want to preserve historical monuments like this and take my future children(hopefully LOL)to them and explain what our parents and grandparents experienced right here and their global Christian Malaspina East Palo Alto CA 94303 United States 10/15/2012 significance. Please save The Cube!!! Because I use to look at the Radar Tower from Leland High School while I attend and think of life outside of San Jose, in the world beyond; somehow seeing the Tower in the distance Deborah Licata San Jose CA 95123 United States 10/15/2012 gave me hope for what might be accomplished in my life. It was an icon. Deanna Jacoby San Jose CA 95118 United States 10/15/2012 It's part of my landscape and an icon. It's also some of San Jose's history! Because i grew up in San Jose with no idea what this was/is and am eager to learn more Dustin Clark San Jose CA 95127 United States 10/15/2012 about it. Federico Galli Los Gatos CA 95030 United States 10/16/2012 Because it is a city historic landmark. Sherri Bohan Monte Sereno CA 95030 United States 10/16/2012 Historic to 20th century Robert Williams Portsmouth VA 23701 United States 10/16/2012 1 am a radar site veteran and have been to Almaden many times. doug morgan san jose CA 95128 United States 10/16/2012 keep the cube. The Sierra Azul/Umunhum area is a remarkable and fascinating historical landmark and I Patrick Nolan Los Gatos CA 95033 United States 10/16/2012 want to run and hike the mountain! think it is of historical value and I also value it as a landmark. Wherever I am in the South Gretchen Weidenbach San Jose CA 95129 United States 10/16/2012 Bay, I can instantly identify Mt. Um by it! Why do we have to keep tearing down historic and memories, for the sake of non-progress. What are going to do sell the land to a developer under the citizens of San Jose's knowlege and sell really expensive homes. This landmark is the least of our problems, let's put our Silvana Ladewig San Jose CA 95124 United States 10/16/2012 money in projects that will benefit the masses. I was born in Almaden and have moved back as an adult. We went up to the top with my girl scout troup in the 1970's. It is so unique, and represents our shared history as well as my personal history. I would never want to see it removed and look forward to being able Kirsten Osorio San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/17/2012 to go to the top. PLEASE DON'T REMOVE ITl l l My husband and I have lived in Almaden for 40 years. We love looking at the tower as a landmark and also for the historic significance it has. It would be tragic to tear it down and lose that history that has been such a part of this area.The tower needs to be saved. Please incorporate it into the open space plan and recognize it for the historical past that was so Glenda Lucas San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/17/2012 important. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District rj R-12-104 Meeting 12-34 October 17, 2012 AGENDA ITEM 1 AGENDA ITEM Approval of Remaining Project Elements of the Mount Umunhurn Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project, Including Selection of a Radar Tower Option and Approval of Summit Area Amenities, as an Amendment to the Use and Management Plan for Sierra AzuI Open Space Preserve GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONSI��� The Board of Directors(Board) approved the demolition portion of the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project(Project)on June 12, 2012 (see Report R- 12-59). At a later meeting on September 19, 2012, the Board approved select Project elements, as well as Factors to Consider for Structures to assist with the decision-making process for the radar tower(see Report R-12-91). This agenda item addresses remaining actions for the Project, as recommended below: 1. Adopt the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Findings of Fact for the entire Project(Attachment 1). 2. Approve the Mitigated Monitoring Response Plan for the entire Project(Attachment 2). 3. Select one of the radar tower options described in this report. 4. Approve the following Project elements, which would be implemented once specific parameters, as described in this report, are met: a. Summit area amenities b. Future public vehicle access to the summit via Mount Umunhurn Road c. Iterative approach for a future shuttle service d. Additional staff positions to be phased as needed (two rangers, one maintenance staff, and one administrative staff) e. Phased Project Implementation Plan f Design of a parking fee system 5. Adopt the attached Resolution for the Project elements(refer to Attachment 3). 6. Direct staff to pursue small-scale capital fundraising for individual Project elements. A R-12-104 Page 2 SUMMARY The Project was developed to identify public access opportunities for the farmer Almaden Air Force Station(AFS) located atop Mount Umunhum.and Mount Thayer in Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve(Preserve) (refer to Attachment 4). The purpose of the October 17, 2012 special meeting is to seek Board selection of a radar tower option and approval of the remaining Project elements. Following final Project approvals, efforts will shift to Project implementation, beginning with trail and parking design with the goal of opening public access to the summit as soon as possible. BACKGROUND Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project was certified by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District(District) Board at a special meeting on June 12, 2012 (refer to Report R-12-59). At that same meeting, the Board approved the demolition of all existing structures, excluding the radar tower, as part of the first phase of public access. At a special meeting of September 19, 2012 (refer to Report R-12-91),the Board approved select Project elements, not including the radar tower and summit area amenities, and removed consideration of the backpack camp from the Project to instead include its consideration as part of the larger Preserve-wide Master Plan. Project elements that have been approved by the Board to date include the following and are primarily located below the elevational summit and radar tower area(refer to Attachment 5). Note that a few of these elements are also proposed for the summit area, such as vault toilets and horse troughs, and are therefore included as part of the list of summit area amenities (see page 3) that are being considered for approval by the Board at the October 17 meeting: 0 Vehicle staging area at Bald Mountain(estimated 30-40 car capacity) 0 Multi-use trail to the summit from the Bald Mountain staging area 0 Safety upgrades and improvements to Mt. Umunhum Road 0 Parking areas adjacent to the summit 0 Visitor center 0 Vault toilet(s) 0 Dedicated 911 call box 0 Hang gliding/paragliding 0 Water tank(s) 0 Horse trough(s) 0 Environmental restoration 0 New trail connection from Mount Thayer to Ralph's Mountain in the Lexington Basin o Nesting structures for avian Species of Special Concern (Purple Martin) R-12-104 Page 3 DISCUSSION Project Description The Project includes phased public access to the summit of Mount Umunhum as well as J p roadway and access improvements, environmental restoration, development of public use facilities, and a range of amenities such as trails, observation and reflection areas, interpretive displays,picnic tables, shade structures, restrooms, and a future visitor center. Structures approved for demolition are scheduled to be removed starting in November or December of 2012 to allow for site restoration and public access improvements. Refer to Attachment 6, Project Summary,which includes a brief overview of the public planning process, goals, objectives, elements, phasing, and financial implications for the Project. Remaining Project Elements under Consideration As part of the October 17 special meeting, the Board is being asked to deliberate on the following remaining Project elements, which are discussed in detail further below: • Selection of a radar tower option • Approval of public access amenities for the summit of Mount Umunhum • Approval of future public vehicle access to the summit via Mt. Umunhum Road • Approval of future shuttle service • Approval of four additional staff positions to be phased as needed(two rangers, one maintenance staff, and one administrative staff) • Phased Project Implementation Plan • Design of a parking fee system Selection of a Radar Tower Option Each radar tower option shares the goals of. 1) interpreting the site's cultural and natural history, i.e., the significance of the mountain to the local Native American Tribal Bands, its place in military and Cold War history, and the unique flora and fauna that are native to the summit; and 2)providing universal access to the summit and to the various site amenities for people of all ability levels. Three options for the Mount Umunhum radar tower were evaluated as part of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)prepared for the Project(refer to Attachment 7): 1. Restoration: remove entire structure and environmentally restore the footprint; 2. Open-air: substantially remove the structure but leave an open-air, publically accessible ground floor, and 3. Retain and seal: retain and seal entire structure, allowing public access to the exterior only. As of the September 19 special meeting, two additional interim actions have been added for Board consideration to allow time for partnerships and/or outside funding to be secured to implement one of the options and address its long-term management and maintenance. The addition of the two new interim actions does not introduce new information requiring a separate CEQA analysis because these actions would not increase the severity of any environmental impact. These two new interim actions can be combined as an initial step toward implementing any of the three radar tower options evaluated in the EIR. A brief discussion of each option and the two new interim actions are described below. R-12-104 Page 4 Option 1. Restoration: Remove entire structure and environmentally restore the footprint Under this option, the tower structure would be removed entirely, leaving only the subsurface foundation. The area would be returned to its former topography to provide proper drainage. Species from the existing native plant community would be selected to replant the area. Cost for the Restoration Option is estimated to be$614,319 with no maintenance requirements. Option 2. Open Air: Remove most of the structure but leave an open-air,publically accessible foundation Under this option, the tower structure would be mostly removed, leaving the foundation and wall sections of the former tower as an open-air public gathering location. The wails would be neatly saw cut, leaving some walls high and others low, allowing for seating, interpretive display, and wind and shade shelter. Cost for the Open Air Option is estimated to be $816,953 with minimal maintenance requirements, similar to what is normally required for District structures/facilities. Option 3. Retain and Seal: Entire structure remains with exterior made publically-accessible Under this option, the structural damage caused by the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake would be repaired and the radar tower sealed to prevent public access into the interior structure. To safely allow the public to access the exterior base of the radar tower, necessary repairs to upgrade the structure to a"collapse"prevention level would include: epoxy injection of cracks, removal and replacement of loose concrete, and infilling openings on the east side the building. Openings would be filled with reinforced concrete doweled into the existing structure. In addition, new roofing would be installed, the roof drainage system repaired/replaced, and a new exterior coating applied to protect the concrete walls. A separate stairway would be preserved to allow access to the roof to perform maintenance and repairs. Interpretive panels may be added to the exterior of the structure. Cost for the Retain and Seal Option is estimated to be$1,105,876 for implementation,plus an additional $250,000 by year 20 and an additional $500,000 by year 40, for a total estimated 40-year cost of ownership of$1,855,876. Security services may be needed and additional associated costs incurred if the Board decides to select this option. There is a concern that the structure's high profile and visibility will continue to draw unwanted interest by after-hours visitors. If security services are needed, costs may average approximately$7,300 per month to provide a presence at the summit during nighttime hours when District rangers are off duty. Interim Action A: Near-term repair and securing of structure while seeking external partnerships This is a new interim action to provide time(approximately 5 years) for proponents of the tower to seek partnerships, outside funding, and other additional resources to allow for implementation of Option 3. However, if no partnerships or additional funding is secured during this timeframe, the Board would reconsider all the options based on future funding and staffing constraints. This short-term solution would provide interim"Life Safety" repairs necessary to allow public access to the exterior base of the tower for this time period. Access to the interior of the structure would only be allowed to District employees, potential funding partners, and repair contractors. The near-term repairs needed for Interim Action A, which have been previously discussed with the County of Santa Clara(County) and the District's consulting structural engineers, Rutherford& Chekene, are estimated to cost $414,855 and would include the following: 1. Sealing all exterior openings 2. Performing epoxy crack repair on the first floor 3. Replacing guardrail at rooftop 4. Replacing interior stair handrails where missing R-12-104 Page 5 5. Improving stairs to rooftop and roof hatch 6. Installing fortified locks at interior doors to each floor 7. Covering openings in floors inside the structure Interim Action B: Near-term fence around structure while seeking external partnerships This is a new alternative interim action to provide additional time for proponents of the tower to seek partnerships, outside funding, and other additional resources to allow for implementation of Option 3. This interim action involves installation of a construction-grade chain link fence around the radar tower. Anticipating that the public may access the summit as early as summer 2016 via a multi-use trail, this near-term fence solution would be necessary for public safety if no repairs or upgrades are made to the tower. Preliminary discussions with the County of Santa Clara indicate that this fence would need to be placed a distance of 80 feet away from the base of the tower to reduce the potential for human injury from loose objects falling off the tall structure, such as sections of the rooftop rail that have corroded and rusted over time. Given the existing topography and tight ridgeline surrounding the tower, a perimeter fence located 80 feet from he base of the radar tower would nearly eliminate public access to the easternmost portions of the summit(known as the Summit Court) and possibly the emergency vehicle turn around area(refer to Attachment 8). As such, if he Board selects this interim action, staff would revisit the discussion with the County of Santa Clara to confirm the fence setback requirements and seek any solutions that would allow a smaller diameter fence. The cost for fence construction is estimated at $74,200. In summar , costs for the three radar tower options and the interim actions are shown below: 20 Years 40 Years Remove and restore $639,319 - - $639,319 footprint Open-air with $816,953 - lowered walls - $816,953 Retain and seal $1,105,876 +$250,000 +$500,000 $1,855,876 Interim Action A - - Near-term Repair $414,855 Interim Action B Near-term-Fence $74,200 - - Board-Approved Factors to Consider for Existing Structures— Including the Radar Tower Consideration of existing structures that are acquired as part of District land purchases typically involves, at a minimum, an evaluation of existing conditions, a determination of the structure's value to the District and its constituents, short-term and long-term costs, maintenance, and staffing requirements. Because the radar tower has become the single greatest point of focus for the Project as a whole, a list of Factors to Consider for Existing Structures has been prepared and was recently approved by the Board to assist with the decision-making process(refer to Report R-12-91). These factors are intended to provide a framework for discussion to assist the Board with determining the outcome for any structure(in this case, the radar tower) and to R-12-104 Page 6 provide the public with an understanding of the factors that normally must be considered as part of the decision-making process. Factors to Consider for Existing Structures A. Board-Adopted District Policies B. Compatibility with Open Space Character of the Site C. Historic and Educational Value D. Partnership Opportunities/Cooperation E. Potential Financial Cost, Including Liability and Management F. Proposed and Potential Uses G. Public Sentiment and Input H. Regional Importance or Value 1. Consistency with Strategic Plan J. Tradeoffs and Impacts on District Resources K. Visitor Experience The Factors to Consider for Existing Structures have been applied to each of the three radar tower options and the two new interim actions, and the findings of this evaluation are provided in Attachment 9. Results of Public Preference Stud as the relate to the Radar Tower Options �_v Earlier this year, the District commissioned Godbe Research to conduct a survey of local voters to, in part, test the influence of Project costs on the potential support for the various radar tower options. The method of data collection was through telephone interviewing. A total of 505 residents within the District boundary and adjacent South Bay Cities outside the District boundary completed the surveys. The margin of error is plus or minus 49% for the District sample. Key conclusions from the survey included: • Over 70 percent of the respondents(71.4%) indicated they support the effort to clean up the former Almaden AFS and open it to the public. • Each of the informed preference options for the radar tower rated roughly equal given the margin of error for the survey. • Cost considerations for each tower option somewhat moderate people's thinking, however, voters do not rank cost among their most important criteria for the site. Approval of Summit Area Amenities The following public access amenities and site improvements are located near the base of the radar tower at the Mount Umunhum elevational summit area(refer to Attachments 5 and 6) and are under Board consideration for approval as part of this Agenda Item: • Summit Court and Drop-off: includes seating, bicycle rack, interpretation amenities, and view overlook • Emergency vehicle turn-around • ADA accessible parking • ADA interpretive trails • ADA and service vehicle accessible ramp to elevational summit 0 Environmental restoration, including native plant community establishment R-12-104 Page 7 • Ceremonial space(s) • Benches and picnic tables • Shade structures • Parking areas • Vault toilet(s) • Horse trough(s) • Nesting structures for avian Species of Special Concern(Purple Martin) Approval of Future Public Vehicular Access to the Summit via Mt. Umunhum Road The Board is being asked at this time to also approve the long-term goal of allowing public vehicular use of Mt. Umunhum Road to allow District staff to proceed with the following: 1. Seek resolution of access issues to allow public use of Mt. Umunhum Road. 2. Explore funding and/or partnership opportunities to help defray the cost of road upgrades and safety improvements along Mt. Umunhum Road. Staff would not proceed with allowing public vehicular access to the summit or the construction of new parking facilities at the summit until the two items described above are first resolved. Approval of Future Shuttle Service Staff further recommends Board approval of an iterative approach to allow for a future shuttle service,provided there is resolution on all of the parameters and constraints listed below: I 1. Resolution of access issues to allow public use of Mt. Umunhum Road 2. Adequate public demand 3. Public willingness to pay 4. Partnership opportunities(including concessionaires) 5. Available offsite parking for staging A shuttle service to the summit of Mount Umunhum would wholly or partially replace personal vehicle access to the summit and may lessen the number of parking spaces needed at the summit. A shuttle service could occur on weekends and holidays from April through November. To inform this recommendation, staff conducted research into similar shuttle systems. The shuttle from Marin City to the Muir Woods National Monument in Marin County is the result of a unique partnership originally funded through federal grant dollars, now operated through federal and county funds, to address traffic issues through residential neighborhoods en route to Muir Woods due to high visitor demand. This shuttle provides comparable data, as it exists specifically to carry round-trip passengers to one destination on narrow, steep, and windy roads. Also, a brief fee study performed in 2011 revealed that the public would support paying fees to visit and/or park vehicles in order to gain access to District Open Space Preserves in general. Although the specific question of willingness to pay a shuttle fee was not included in the survey, public support for visitor fees is encouraging and bodes well for potential future shuttle fees. Based on staff research,public demand would need to be high and shuttles regularly filled for a partner or concessionaire to provide this service. Given that it is too speculative at this time to I determine if a shuttle service would be cost-effective to be feasible, staff recommends an i iterative approach to implement a shuttle system. Staff would monitor visitation levels and visitor interest once the area is made open to the public to determine whether visitation regularly exceeds expectations. If adequate demand exists, staff would then seek partnerships with appropriate local companies and/or organizations to provide the shuttle service. Implementation R-12-104 Page 8 of a shuttle service would not require further CEQA analysis beyond what has been already analyzed as part of the Project EIR, unless additional elements were added or site conditions had changed such that new environmental impacts could result. Approval of Additional Staff Positions The Board is being asked at this time to also consider approving the phasing of additional staff positions to support the Project. It is not anticipated that the Project, in its early phases, would create a substantial demand for staffing. However, as more facilities are developed on Mount Umunhum, and if 1 visitation levels increase significantly and remain stead and 2 the public O g Y O Y is allowed to drive and park at the summit, additional staff will be needed to meet increased patrol, maintenance and visitor services needs. Two new rangers, one new maintenance field p g a staff position, and one new administrative staff position may be needed over the long-term to address increased staffing needs associated with full build-out/high visitation levels for the Project. New staff positions would be added and staffing levels adjusted based on trends and level of visitation. It is anticipated that visitation at Mount Umunhum will initially be high, after the first phase of public access improvements are completed (a staging area at the Bald Mountain trailhead and a new multi-use trail to the summit), and the excitement of the project is fresh. However, since upper Mt. Umunhum Road would remain closed to vehicles until public access issues are resolved, visitation will be initially limited to those who are able to traverse the approximately 1.75-mile trail on foot,bicycle, or horse. Moreover, access by vehicle(once and if public vehicular access to the summit is allowed) is also expected to be limited at first via a permit or shuttle system. Visitation is not expected to increase substantially until and if the road is made fully accessible to the public and parking facilities are made available at the summit. Approval of Phased Project Implementation Plan As part of this Agenda Item, the Board is also asked to approve a phased implementation plan for the Project(refer to Attachment 10). Implementation would be phased as funding is made available, with the expectation that staff would seek outside funding(e.g. donations, grants) to jhelp defray implementation costs. Following Phase I demolition(which was previously approved by the Board), staff recommends that implementation of remaining Project elements be phased as follows: Phase II, Trails and Staging 1. Approximately 30-40 vehicle parking area on Mount Umunhum Road near Bald Mountain 2. Multi-use trail from the parking area to the summit for hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians j3. Environmental restoration(re-establishing natural drainage features and native plants) 4. Minimal and preliminary site amenities at the summit, including vault toilet and trail; may include seating, shade, and summit loop trail Phase III, Radar Tower and Summit Area 1. Environmental restoration(other summit area improvements are discussed in the Unscheduled Phase of the Project and dependent on outside factors) Phase IV, Additional Project Development 1. Interpretive amenities and programming 2. Multi-use trail throughout summit area 3. Further environmental restoration R-12-104 Page 9 Unscheduled Phase—dependent on outside factors (e.g. partnerships, access, etc) 1. Implementation of the Board-approved radar tower option 2. Small parking area at summit with limited permit-only driving access via Mount Umunhum Road once road access issues have been resolved with the following considerations: Limited number of permits per day; • Offered on select weekend and holidays between April and November; • Subject to weather; • Issued on a first-come, first-served basis. 3. Interpretive/visitor center 4. Safety and road upgrades to Mount Umunhum Road and new parking area(s) at the summit; general public access by vehicle allowed and permit-only vehicle access discontinued. j 5. ADA accessible trail construction at summit area(dependent on public vehicle access). Funding PP J Opportunities for the Project To proceed with Project implementation, staff recommends that the Board direct staff to pursue small-scale capital fundraising to help offset the cost of individual Project elements. There has been much discussion regarding ways to offset implementation costs for the Project, including capital campaigns and partnership opportunities. At this time, staff does not recommend that the District pursue a large development program to fund the entirety of the project as described p g p P b Y p J below, but instead, focus on smaller opportunities to fund discreet portions of the Project such as the trail to the summit and the parking area near Bald Mountain. The reasoning for this recommendation is provided below. In 2011 the District contracted with Stewart Woods and Associates SWA a development e o 0 (SWA), p consulting firm based in Palo Alto, to evaluate the potential for generating additional streams of revenue to fund District capital improvement projects. Specifically, SWA evaluated the potential for enhancing the relationship with our current funding partners, building an in-house development program, and conducting a stand-alone capital campaign to fund the Project. SWA's scope of services did not include interviews with potential donors but rather was focused on partner organizations, the Board, and District staff to summarize potential opportunities and constraints associated with various forms of funds development. Information generated by the study suggested that the very significant institutional changes needed to support an in-house development program make it infeasible at this time for the District to conduct a large-scale capital campaign (e.g. a campaign to fund the entire Project). Such a campaign would require dedicated full-time staff and an institutional culture focused on donor stewardship and outreach. Should the Board decide that this is an appropriate direction for the District, SWA noted that a minimum of two years and significant operating funds would be required to build this capacity. However, the District does have the capacity to fundraise and secure outside funds on a smaller scale through federal, state, and local grant programs that support recreational facilities and "grassroots"methodologies to seek donations through direct mailings, web-based outreach, and special events. While these efforts also require staff time, the District has prior experience and success with these efforts. Depending on staff resources and capacity, these efforts may be staff- led or managed with the help of outside consultants or short-term contract positions. Given our prior experience, although this type of effort can result in a contribution bution towards Projec t implementation, the District will very likely need to provide matching funds to cover implementation costs. R-12-104 Page 10 Other Potential Sources of Revenue—Parking Fees Another method that has been examined to defer implementation costs is through a parking fee system. Based on our findings regarding parking fees, staff recommends that the Board consider approving an iterative approach to implement a future parking fee system for the Project, starting with the design of a suitable fee system. Such a fee system could be established once the following parameters are sufficiently met: • Safety and road upgrades to Mt. Umunhum Road are completed; • Public vehicle access is established; • Expected visitation levels are sufficiently determined; • Public willingness to pay is confirmed; • Amenities offered at the summit are sufficient to sustain visitation levels over time; and • Cost-benefit analysis is adequate. Public Sentiment Regarding Fees Last June 2011,the District contracted with Godbe Research of San Mateo to perform a representative study to reveal the sentiment and readiness of District constituents to pay a fee for vehicle access to Mount Umunhum and other preserves. Results showed a willingness to pay for visitor access to Mount Umunhum as well as support for a broader parking fee for select Preserves. Select questions asked during the poll and the results are as follows: 1. Mount Umunhum: Do you support or oppose a fee to park? $9 fee: 50% within District support; 53% in neighboring areas support $6 fee: 67% within District support; 77% in neighboring areas support $3 fee: 84% within District support; 87% in neighboring areas support 2. Parking fee in general: Would you support a$6 fee at selected preserves? 54% within District support; 67% in neighboring areas support i The survey included residents in neighboring areas of San Jose, who live outside the District boundary. The opinions of San Jose residents were included because South Bay residents are expected to be among the heaviest users of the Mount Umunhum area given the close geographic proximity. Data regarding visitor willingness to pay a fee can inform the District's calculation of potential income that can be generated to help offset ongoing, operational expenses and capital costs, including the maintenance of Mt. Umunhum Road. Anticipated Visitor Use Projections of potential open space visitation are difficult to calculate, especially for unique j visitor sites located in remote areas such as that found atop Mount Umunhum. The best approach to arrive at a rough projection and range is through the extrapolation of daily traffic volumes based on yearly attendance levels at other similar local and remote parks. Crane Transportation Group (Crane) of San Pablo produced a rough annual visitation estimate for the Project. Visitation was estimated by comparing traffic count data for Hicks and Mt. Umunhum Roads with traffic data from State Route 130 between Joseph D. Grant County Park(Grant Park)and Mount Hamilton, and visitor data from these two facilities was factored in. By extrapolating the visitor and associated traffic data at these other facilities, Crane estimates that peak annual visitor levels for the Project could range from 20,000-25,000 people with minimum amenities, to as much as 35,000-40,000 people if all facilities were constructed, including public vehicle access on Mt. Umunhum Road and a visitor center at the summit. Moreover,based in part on 2009 data R-12-104 Page 11 for Grant Park, Crane projects that peak summer season weekday traffic on Mt. Umunhum Road may account for a weekday Average Annual Daily Traffic Count of+/-120 vehicles(60 in/60 out), a Saturday count of+/- 340 vehicles (170 in/170 out), and a Sunday count of+/-240 vehicles(120 in/120 out). These numbers assume that public access issues along Mt. Umunhum Road have been resolved, the road made open to public vehicles, and the Project has reached full build-out. Parking Fee System for Mount Umunhum Parking fees may be collected on the honor system using non-staffed collection boxes at or near the parking areas; this system has been commonly used at many State and County parks. However, discussions with neighboring parks indicate an average 70% or less compliance rate with this system. Staffed kiosks and patrol services require ongoing staff resources to collect and process fees as well as check for compliance on every parked vehicle, and can cost more to implement than is collected through fees. Maximum monthly income from parking could generate up to $14,000 per month before expenses. This was calculated assuming a$6 per vehicle fee, and utilizing the figures for the Average Annual Daily Traffic Counts at full Project build-out including a visitor center. This reflects a maximum value for one of the peak summer months that could potentially be generated if the summit was open for visitation seven days a week; however, actual income after expenses are deducted is expected to be less. If the Board approves a fee system, staff would first begin by designing a system that is both appropriate for the site and can be managed with existing staff resources. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the Project, including consultant fees, public meeting facility rentals, and public notification costs, were included in the Planning Department's FY2012-13 budget. Since the FY2012-13 budget was approved in March 2012, a number of additional public meetings, additional data collection, and increased consultant support have been required. To account for this additional work, staff will be requesting a Midyear Budget Adjustment later this calendar year. Financial Implications of Project Following demolition, full Project build-out, including environmental restoration and public access improvements, is expected to cost approximately$9.2 million, not including safety and road upgrades to Mt. Umunhum Road, which are expected to cost an additional$3 million (estimates are in 2011 dollars). A summary of these estimated costs by phase is provided as Attachment 10. These costs will be phased in as funding allows. BOARD COMMITTEE REVIEW The Sierra Azul/Bear Creek Redwoods Ad Hoc Committee have been continuously receiving information and providing feedback and guidance on the Project. Over the last two years, the Ad Hoc Committee has met many times for this purpose, specifically to review Project elements and to develop a consensus on what elements to forward to the full Board of Directors for their consideration. R-12-104 Page 12 PUBLIC NOTICE Notices about this special meeting of September 19, 2012 were sent to nearly 3,200 interested parties, in addition to approximately 1,500 email recipients, including all individuals and organizations requesting notice. Notification about the meeting was included in the District's fall 2012 newsletter and the District's website. Public Participation and Comment The most recent Project Decision Hearing held in Menlo Park on September 17, 2012 was attended by approximately 36 members of the public. Written comments collected at the meeting and other public comments received since the meeting are provided as Attachment 11. Late public comments will be included as a late attachment for the October 17, 2012 meeting. It is clear that of all the project elements, the radar tower has produced the strongest and widest range of opinions among the public, staff, and agencies. To date,the total number of individual online petitions that have been received since the start of the project total 2,065 signatures and 587 individual comments. The signatures and comments that have been received since the last meeting on September 19, 2012 (see Report R-12-91) are also provided as Attachment 11. CEQA COMPLIANCE On June 12, 2012, the Board certified the Environmental Impact Report(EIR) for the Project (refer to Report R-12-59) and also approved demolition of the remaining structures except for the radar tower. On September 19, 2012, the Board approved select Project elements not including the radar tower and summit area amenities (refer to Report R-12-9 1). Although the radar tower decision was deferred, the Project EIR analyzed all of the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the summit area amenities and radar tower options that are currently under public and Board review. Prior to making any decision on any remaining Project elements, which is the purpose of this meeting, the Board will first need to consider adoption of the CEQA Findings of Fact, approval of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan, and adoption of a Resolution for the Project for the relevant portions of the Project under consideration for approval (Attachments 1, 2, and 3). NEXT STEPS If the Board approves all Project elements, efforts will focus on Project implementation, which would begin with trail and parking design to allow public access to the summit as soon as possible. Attachment(s) 1. Findings of Fact for Portions of the Project 2. Mitigated Monitoring Plan for Portions of the Project 3. Resolution Approving Portions of the Project 4. Map of Project Area 5. Summit Concept Plan and Elements Included in Project Approval 6. Project Summary 7. Landscape Architect Rendering of Three Tower Options 8. Summit Concept Plan and Radar Tower Fence Location 9. Evaluation of Each Radar Tower Option against the Board-Approved Factors to Consider for Existing Structure R-12-104 Page 13 10. Cost and Phasing Summary 11. Public comment through October 11,2012 12. Late public comment through noon October 17, 2012 (will be provided at the October 17 meeting.) Responsible Department Head: Ana Ruiz, AICP, Planning Manager Prepared by: Meredith Manning, Senior Planner Contact person: Same ATTACHMENT I Findings of Fact for the Mount Umunhurn Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Environmental Impact Report Prepared by: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 33o Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 Contact: Meredith Manning Senior Planner Phone: 650-691-1200 Fax: 650-691-0485 mt.um@openspace.org October 17, 2012 Statement of Findings 10010041,01 I i Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project TABLE OF CONTENTS � � Section Page � � � 1.0 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS...................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................................1 12 Description of the Approved Project......................................................................................................4 1.3 Environmental Review Process...............................................................................................................S � � 1.4 Description of the Record.......................................................................................................................6 � 1.5 Significant Environmental Impacts of the Project..................................................................................7 1.6 General Findings.....................................................................................................................................7 1.7 Alternatives.............................................................................................................................................9 1.8 Findings of Fact........................................................................................ ..............................................9 � 1.9 Mitigation Monitoring Plan.................................................................................................................. JQ � Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District � � � Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Projecti to STATEMENT OF FINDINGS 1.1 INTRODUCTION a. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District's (MROSD or District) purpose is to purchase, permanently protect, and restore lands forming a regional open space greenbelt, preserve unspoiled wilderness, wildlife habitat, watershed, viewshed, and fragile ecosystems, and provide opportunities for low-intensity recreation and environmental education. In the late 1950s, the United States government procured Mount Umunhum to build the Almaden AFS, a US Air Force early warning radar base that operated from 1958 to 1980. The base was constructed as part of the North American Aerospace Defense (NORAD) Command to keep watch over northern California's airspace during the Cold War. With the end of the Cold War, and as a result of advancements in satellite technology,this and other radar base sites became obsolete. The official "inactivation" date of the facility was June 30, 1980. In June 1982, control of the property and improvements was transferred to the General Services Administration (GSA).The District purchased the 44-acre base in April 1986 from the GSA. The District acquired the former Almaden AFS and all remaining facilities at the site with the ultimate intent to restore the area to a natural condition and provide public access; however, hazardous materials associated with the construction and operation of the base had to first be removed. While a portion of hazardous materials was cleaned up by the federal government soon after the District's purchase, other materials, particularly lead- based paint and asbestos-containing construction materials used on buildings, fell outside the scope of the original federal cleanup program. The District approved the structure abatement project in August 2010, which was complete in the summer of 2011. MROSD officially proposed the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access project in 2010. In the fall of 2010, MROSD held two public meetings to gather input on the project features. A public scoping meeting was held in December 2010 to help determine the scope of the Draft EIR. On December 13, 2010 notice of preparation(NOP)was released for 30-day public review ending January 12, 2011. On December 12, 2011 the Draft EIR was released and a public hearing on the Draft EIR was held in January 2012. On May 25, 2012,the Final EIR was released. The project decisions have occurred in stages. On June 12, 2012, the District certified the EIR and approved the demolition phase of the proposed Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project . This approved phase did not include demolition of the radar tower. The District hosted a public open Pp p p house/workshop on July 18, 2012 to gather public input on the radar tower options. The open house/workshop was well-attended, and the public provided substantial comments to District staff. A second decision hearing ch was held on September 19 at which the Board of Directors approved development of all project components not located on the summit of Mount Umunhum. it should also be noted that the proposed backpack camp was removed from the overall project at the September 191h hearing. The EIR considered three options for disposition of the radar tower: demolition/site restoration, partial demolition and retention of the foundation, or seal in place. These findings apply to any of the three options, except as specified in specific impact discussions herein. These Findings of Fact address the portions of the p p p p g project currently under consideration,as well as the findings of fact identified for the two previous approvals. P Open Mid peninsula Regional O Space District P g P Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 1 Statement of Findings b. PROJECT GOALS/OBJECTIVES The goal of the proposed project is to establish a fiscally and environmentally sustainable visitor destination that aligns with the District's mission by balancing public access, enjoyment,and education with environmental restoration.This goal will be achieved through the following objectives: Y Create a destination that is accessible to and accommodates a broad range of user groups and introduces new visitors to open space. Remove or permanently cap physical hazards and restore the native landscape and habitat for wildlife as much as possible. Y Provide minimalist visitor amenities that complement and highlight the world-class views and open space experience. r Provide ample, rich,and diverse trail experiences for hikers, bicyclists,and equestrians. I Highlight the rich natural and cultural history of the site through self-discovery and focused interpretive and educational opportunities. The project site is located at the former Almaden Air Force Station,which is currently closed to the public. Structures were recently abated to remove hazardous building materials (mostly containing asbestos and lead). The proposed project requires demolition of most(possibly all)of the abandoned structures associated with the former Almaden Air Force Station.The site includes a visually-prominent five-story concrete structure,the "radar tower",constructed as the base for a long-range radar"sail"which was removed some time ago.Three options are proposed for addressing the radar tower: 1) retain and seal entire structure;2) substantially remove the structure but leave a publically accessible foundation;or 3) remove entire structure and environmentally restore the footprint. Aside from demolition,the primary components of the proposed project include phased public access to the summit of Mount Umunhum, as well as roadway and access improvements,environmental and landform restoration,development of public use facilities and a range of possible amenities such as trails,observation and reflection areas, interpretive displays,picnic tables, shade structures, restrooms,and visitor center.The project also includes longer term plans to allow public access to the summit of Mount Thayer via a trail connection from Ralph's Mountain. Note that the proposed backpack camp is no longer included among the project components. C. CEQA REQUIREMENTS FOR FINDINGS The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code§§21000 et seq.and the regulations implementing that statute,Cal. Code Regs.tit. 14, §§ 15000 et seq. (the"CEQA Guidelines") (collectively,the act and the CEQA Guidelines are referred to as"CEQA") require public agencies to consider the potential effects of their discretionary activities on the environment and,when feasible,to adopt and implement mitigation measures that avoid or substantially lessen the effects of those activities on the environment. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21002 provides that"public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.] The same statute states that the procedures required by CEQA"are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects." Section 21002 goes on to state that"in the event [that] specific economic,social,or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof." The mandate and principles announced in Public Resources Code Section 21002 are implemented, in part, through the requirement that agencies must adopt findings before approving projects for which EIRs are required. (See Pub. Resources Code,§21081,subd. (a); CEQA Guidelines, § 15091, subd. (a).) For each significant environmental effect identified in an EIR for a proposed project,the approving agency must issue a written finding reaching one or more of three permissible conclusions. The three possible findings are: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. (2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been,or can and should be,adopted by the other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal,social,technological,other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. (Public Resources Code Section 21081,subd (a);see also CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091,subd. (a).) Public Resources Code section 21061.1 defines"feasible"to mean "capable of being accomplished in a p successful manner within a reasonable period of time,taking into account economic,environmental,social and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: "legal"considerations. (See also Citizens of Golden Valley v. Board of Supervisors(Goleta/l) (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553,565.) The concept of"feasibility"also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego(1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410,417 (City of Del Mar).) "[F]easibility" under CEQA encompasses 'desirability'to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic,environmental,social,and technological factors." (Ibid.;see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland(1993)23 Cal.App.4`h 704,715 (Sequoyah Hills);see also California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz(2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1001 [after weighing"'economic,environmental,social,and technological factors' ... 'an agency may conclude that a mitigation measure or alternative is impracticable or undesirable from a policy standpoint and p p Y p reject it as infeasible on that ground'"].) With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its"unavoidable adverse environmental effects." (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043,subd. (b);see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081,subd. (b).) The California Supreme Court has stated, "[t]he wisdom of approving—any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced." (Goleta 1l,52 Cal.3d at p. 576) Because the EIR identified significant effects that may occur as a result of the project, including implementation of components of the project under consideration at this time, and in accordance with the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 3 Statement of Findings provisions of the CEQA Guidelines presented above,the District hereby adopts these Findings as part of the approval of the development of the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project. These Findings constitute the District's best efforts to set forth the evidentiary and policy bases for its decision to approve the Project in a manner consistent with the requirements of CEQA. These Findings, in other words, are not merely informational, but rather constitute a binding set of obligations that come into effect with the District's approval of these portions of the Project. d. ORGANIZATION OF FINDINGS These Findings are organized into a number of sections: Section 1.1 provides the background and context of the Project and describes the need for these Findings;Section 1.2 includes a description of the Project being approved within the overall context of the entire Project;Section 1.3 describes the CEQA environmental review process for the Project;Section 1.4 describes the record of documents for the Project;Section 1.5 describes the significant environmental impacts of the Project;Section 1.6 contains the District's general Findings about the Project;Section 1.7 contains the District's Findings regarding alternatives to the Project; Section 1.8 contains District's Findings that the Project as a whole, including this element of the project, has no significant and unavoidable effects;and Section 1.9 describes the Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP)for this element of the Project. Because there are no significant and unavoidable impacts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations is not needed. 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE APPROVED PROJECT For a complete project description please refer to Chapter 3 of the Draft EIR,which is attached hereto as Attachment B. a. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located on approximately 44 acres within the 18,000-acre Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. The site is located on the summits of Mount Umunhum and Mount Thayer, in the southern Santa Cruz Mountains. The project site is the site of the former Almaden Air Force Station,which was decommissioned in 1980.The project site consists of the former military complex comprised of operations, housing and support structures and self-contained infrastructure requirements (water,sewer,electrical). Among these is the five- story high, massive concrete"radar tower"formerly used as the base supporting an 85-ton radar sail.The sail was removed by the federal government before the District purchased the property.The buildings have been abandoned for 30 years,and due to the passage of time,vandalism,and extreme weather conditions,the structures are severely dilapidated. The main site access road, Mt. Umunhum Road, begins at Hicks Road and continues for approximately five miles to the entrance of the former Almaden AFS near the summit.As a result of prior clean-up activities,centered in removing lead based paint and asbestos-containing material, most of the existing buildings have been substantially altered,with siding removed and similar alterations. b. PROJECT DESCRIPTION For a project complete ect description, I p p c ption, including components of the project already approved, please refer to Chapter 3 of the Draft EIR. 1. As described in the EIR, individual components of the project maybe phased as funding and other constraints are removed. The portion of the project currently under consideration includes selection of a radar tower option and development of the Mount Umunhum Summit.The project considered in the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 4 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings EIR, including previously approved components(as noted), includes: Demolition of former military buildings (except the Radar Tower)on Mt. Umunhum and Mount Thayer. (Approved by the Board of Directors on June 12,2012) 2. Three options for the Radar Tower: retain and seal, remove most of the structure but leave a publically accessible foundation,or remove the entire structure and environmentally restore the footprint are being considered. 3. Environmental Restoration:following demolition of structures,the landform and habitat on the site would be restored. (Approved by the Board of Directors on September 19,2012) 4. Observation, Reflection, and Ceremonial Facilities: a trail and viewpoint would provide interpretive features of the site's natural, Native American, and military cultural history. 5. Trails:a variety of trails and trail connections would be provided as feasible, based on land ownership and other considerations. (Approved by the Board of Directors on September 19,2012) 6. Hang Gliding:A hang gliding launch site and landing area would be provided,with restrictions on the numbers of people using the facilities at any one time. (Approved by the Board of Directors on September 19,2012) 7. Parking, Circulation,Access:a new parking/staging area would be constructed on Mt. Umunhum road at the Bald Mountain trailhead with additional parking at the summit in the future. Mt. Umunhum Road pavement conditions would be improved and safety signage would be added. (Approved by the Board of Directors on September 19,2012) 8. Other components of the project would include benches, picnic tables, utilities,and staffing. (Approved , by the Board of Directors on September 19,2012) r P eviousl approved componentsr n a e of being reconsidered n a dare included here to provide overall context. Y ppg These Findings of Fact identify previously approved portions of the project for informational purposes,and the findings specific to the actions before the District are highlighted. 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS The MROSD has prepared an EIR, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA,to analyze the potential effects of the Project on the environment.As required by CEQA,the MROSD has conducted a thorough public outreach effort during the environmental review process so as to ensure that District decision makers and members of the public are informed about the potential for significant adverse effects on the environment from proposed activities. The District began its public outreach effort at the outset of the current CEQA process. Prior to initiation of the Draft EIR,the MROSD held a public meeting to receive input on project features and preferences. This public meeting was held September 30, 2010. A public open house was held on November 18, 2010,to present the results of the first meeting and obtain further public feedback. A public scoping meeting on the issues to be addressed in the Draft EIR was held on December 9, 2010. Following these meetings,a notice of preparation (NOP)of this Draft EIR was released for public review,with the review period running from December 13, 2010 through January 12, 2011.This Draft EIR was circulated for a 60-day review period,which exceeds CEQA 45-day requirements specified in CEQA Guidelines§15105. The Draft EIR review period began December 12, 2011 and Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 5 Statement of Findings ended February 10, 2012.A public hearing to receive oral comments on the Draft EIR was held January 18, 2012. The Final EIR was released May 25, 2012. The MROSD has met with members of the public and public agencies,on request. Additionally,although the comment period on the Draft EIR closed February 10,2012,the District responded to all comments received on the Draft EIR prior to the May 25, 2012 release of the Final EIR,even if the comments were received after February 10. At a public hearing held on June 12,2012,the District certified the EIR and approved the demolition phase of the project(excluding the radar tower).The District relied on the certified EIR to approve the"non-summit" components of the proposed project on September 191", 2012. 1.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE RECORD For purposes of CEQA and these Findings,the record before the MROSD Board of Directors is composed of all documents relating to the Project in the MROSD's files on this matter, including,without limitation: a. The Notice of Preparation prepared for the Project (December 13, 2010); b. The Draft EIR for the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project,together with all appendices to the Draft EIR (December 13, 2011); c. All comments or documents submitted by public agencies or by members of the public during or after the comment period on the Draft EIR(December 12, 2011 through February 10,2012)or up to the MROSD Board of Directors'approval of the Project; d. The Final EIR for the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project(May 25, 2012); e. The Mitigation Monitoring Plans (MMPs)for the previous two approvals and the overall project included as a separate attachment; f. All findings and resolutions from the two previous approvals and the overall project adopted by the Board of Directors in connection with the Project and all documents cited or referred to therein; g. All staff reports and presentation materials related to the Project, including those prepared for the following public scoping, input, and project decision meetings and hearings: Public Scoping Meeting (December 9, 2010); DEIR public hearing(January 18, 2012); project decision hearing for non-tower building demolition (June 12, 2012); project decision hearing for non-summit development(September 19, 2012) ; and the final decision hearing for summit development and selection of a radar tower option. h. All studies conducted for the Project and contained in, or referenced by,staff reports,the Draft EIR, or the Final EIR; i. All public reports and documents related to the Project prepared for or by the MROSD, including, without limitation,all planning documents. j. All documentary and oral evidence received and reviewed at public hearings,meetings and workshops related to the Project,the Draft EIR,the Final EIR or the MMPs; Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 6 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings k. All other public reports and documents relating to the Project that were used by the MROSD staff or consultants in the preparation of the Draft EIR,the Final EIR or the MMPs;and I. All other documents, not otherwise included above, required by Public Resources Code section 21167.6. 1.5 SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT The EIR identifies significant impacts to a number of environmental resources related to the entire Project: • Cultural Resources • Biological Resources • Hydrology and Water Quality • Geology and Solis • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Air Quality • Traffic and Circulation As described below(Section 1.8), mitigation measures are available to reduce each of these impacts to a less-than-significant level,and the District has adopted such measures. It should also be noted that the MROSD will voluntarily commit to measures to reduce fire risk and also to measures to reduce impacts to historic resources(only if the District chooses not to retain the radar tower),even though the Draft EIR concludes these impacts to be less than significant. 1.6 GENERAL FINDINGS a. CERTIFICATION OF THE EIR The MROSD Board of Directors certified the EIR on June 12, 2012,which addressed the entire project,and the Board approved the demolition phase of the proposed project.The certified EIR also addresses the components under consideration as described in Section 1.2,which for purposes of these Findings are hereafter generally referred to in total as the Project. In accordance with CEQA,the MROSD Board of Directors has considered the effects of the Project on the environment, as shown in the Draft and Final EIRs and the whole of the administrative record prior to taking any action on the Project. The Final EIR was presented to the Board of Directors and released for public review on May 25, 2012. The Board of Directors has reviewed and considered the certified Draft and Final EIRs and the information relating to the environmental impacts of the Project contained in those documents. A copy of the Board of Directors' prior resolution certifying the EIR is included as a separate attachment. By these Findings,the Board ratifies and adopts the conclusions of the Final EIR as set forth in these Findings, except where such conclusions are specifically modified by these Findings.The Final EIR and these Findings represent the independent judgment and analysis of the Board of Directors. b. EVIDENTIARY BASIS FOR FINDINGS These Findings are based upon substantial evidence in the entire record before the District. The references to the Draft EIR and Final EIR set forth in the Findings are for ease of reference and are not intended to provide an exhaustive list of the evidence relied upon for these Findings. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 7 Statement of Findings C. FINDINGS REGARDING MITIGATION MEASURES i. MITIGATION MEASURES ADOPTED The mitigation measures herein referenced are those identified in the Final EIR and adopted by the District as set forth in the MMP. H. IMPACT AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES. As stated in these Findings, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines§15092,the MROSD finds that environmental effects of the Project, including those elements considered in the current approval,will not be significant or will be mitigated to a less than significant level by the adopted mitigation measures. The MROSD has substantially lessened or eliminated all significant environmental effects. The MROSD finds that the mitigation measures incorporated into and imposed upon the portions of the Project will not have new significant environmental impacts that were not analyzed in the Draft EIR. ill. RELATIONSHIP OF FINDINGS AND MMP TO FINAL EIR These Findings and the MMP are intended to summarize and describe the contents and conclusions of the Draft and Final EIR pertaining to the demolition phase for policymakers and the public. The MROSD will implement all measures contained in the Final EIR. In the event that there is any inconsistency between the descriptions of mitigation measures in these Findings or the MMP and the Final EIR,the MROSD will implement the measures as they are described in the Final EIR. In the event a mitigation measure recommended in the Final EIR has inadvertently been omitted from these Findings or from the MMP,such a mitigation measure is hereby adopted and incorporated in the Findings and/or MMP as applicable. CI. LOCATION AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS Pursuant to Public Resource Code §15091,the MROSD is the custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision is based,and such documents and other materials are located at MROSD,330 Distel circle, Los Altos,CA 94022. Copies of the Draft and Final EIRs are also available at the MROSD s website at http://www.openspace.org/plans_projects/mt_umunhum.asp. 1.7 ALTERNATIVES In accordance with Section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines,a range of reasonable alternatives to the project that could, potentially, accomplish the basic project objectives addressed in the EIR. However,the MROSD finds that specific environmental, economic, legal,social,technological,or other considerations,as enumerated in the discussion I f alternatives, I o ate at es below, make infeasible each of the alternatives t considered in he e EIR. Most importantly,the project as proposed will not result in any unmitigated significant impacts, so no alternatives are needed to substantially reduce significant effects. This is enumerated in more detail below. Chapter 6,Alternatives,of the Draft EIR provides an analysis of the comparative impacts anticipated from four alternatives to the proposed project: 1)the No Project Alternative,which assumes no demolition, environmental restoration,or public access and associated facilities would occur; 2) Limited Ground Disturbance Alternative,which would eliminate nearly all of the proposed components of the project that would require ground disturbance, including environmental and landform restoration and regional trail connections;3) Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 8 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings Reduced Amenities/Increased Restoration Alternative,which includes elimination of most of the"structural' public amenities,such as the visitors center, restrooms, picnic tables,shade structures, etc.,and would increase the amount of environmental restoration;and 4)Shuttle Alternative,which would generally restrict auto access to the site and would instead include a shuttle service. As discussed in Section 6,although the No Project Alternative would not avoid or substantially reduce any environmental impacts of the proposed project, it would result in a greater reduction than the other three alternatives and would therefore be considered the environmentally superior alternative. However,CEQA requires that if the No Project alternative is identified as the environmentally superior alternative, another alternative must be selected from the range as the environmentally superior. In this case,all three of the other alternatives result in similar impacts to the proposed project. However,the proposed project itself involves minimal development, includes environmental restoration, and is designed to be low impact. Consequently, with implementation of proposed mitigation measures,the proposed project results in no significant impacts to the environment.Therefore, none of the Alternatives avoids or substantially reduces a significant impact of the proposed project. Furthermore, because the level of impact is similar between the proposed project and all of the Alternatives (except for No Project),there is no clear environmentally superior alternative aside from the No Project Alternative. In addition,the EIR evaluated the potential for environmental impacts resulting from three options for the existing radar tower: 1) retain and seal the structure onsite;2) remove majority of structure but leave a publically accessible foundation; and 3) remove entire structure and environmentally restore the footprint. There is not a clear environmentally superior option for the radar tower. Because the radar tower is not considered to be eligible for listing as an historic resource,demolition would not be considered a significant historic resources impact. Furthermore,as described in the EIR, retaining the radar tower is less aesthetically desirable than removing the tower,although some public comments have expressed that retaining the tower is more aesthetically desirable (this is a subjective issue) . Mitigation measures are included in the EIR to reduce the impacts related to tower demolition (i.e. dust and air quality emissions)to a less-than-significant level. Retention of the tower also requires mitigation to reduce hazards associated with the nearby slope. Option 2 would be the least environmentally superior option (although negligibly so) because it shares the environmental impacts of the other two options and does not avoid any of their impacts. However,Option 2 should still be considered by the District equally along with the other two radar tower options. No option is considered environmentally superior. Only the No Project Alternative and the Limited Ground Disturbance Alternative would reduce impacts associated with demolition of existing buildings, and they are the only alternatives considered in these Findings. The MROSD finds that these alternatives to the project are infeasible due to social and other considerations.As described in the EIR, although the alternatives may reduce some of the significant impacts, mitigation measures adopted to implement the demolition phase would reduce all significant impacts to a less than significant level. Further,since no actions would occur,the No Project Alternative would not meet any objectives of the proposed project, including creating a destination accessible to a broad user group, removal of physical hazards, and restoration of native landscape.The Limited Ground Disturbance Alternative similarly would not meet most project objectives including p � � g restoration of native landscape. Because the alternatives do not meet key project P Yp 1 objectives,the MROSD finds the alternatives to be infeasible. 1.8 FINDINGS OF FACT The MROSD Board of Directors has reviewed the Final EIR for the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Phase Project,consisting of the Draft EIR (December 2011)and the Final EIR(May Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 9 Statement of Findings 2012),together which form the Final EIR. The MROSD Board of Directors has considered the public record on the portions of the project,which, in addition to the above documents and this Statement of Findings, is composed of the following element: Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP)forthe Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Phase Project,dated October 2012.The MMP meets the requirements of Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code by providing a monitoring plan designed to ensure compliance during project implementation with mitigation measures adopted by the MROSD. All relevant project documents are on file at MROSD,330 Distel Circle, Los Altos,CA 94022. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081,for each significant effect identified in the EIR,the MROSD must make one or more of the findings described in Section 1.1 above. After reviewing the public record,composed of the aforementioned elements,the Board of Directors of the MROSD hereby makes the following Findings regarding the significant effects of the proposed project, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines.The numeric references for each impact refer to the impact/mitigation label included in the EIR. a. CULTURAL RESOURCES Less than Significant Effect:Impact 4.2-2 Construction-Related impacts on Documented Significant Historical Resources. Implementation of the project, including removal, retention,or partial retention of the tower,would not result in any impacts on any documented historical resources presently listed or possibly eligible for listing in the CRHR because no resources are known to be present within the project site and none of the historic-era structures within the important are associated with j ro historic events or persons at the national,state,or local level. p Consequently,this im act would be less-than-significant. p 8 Finding Although mitigation is not required to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level, MROSD has nevertheless required changes or alterations in the project by the MROSD that that further reduce this impact. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measures that will further reduce this already less-than- significant impact associated with historic resources: Mitigation Measure 4.2-2(Voluntary)—Radar Options 2 and 3 Only If MROSD selects radar tower Option 1 (retain and seal the structure)no further mitigation is necessary. If MROSD selects either radar tower Option 2(demolish but leave the foundation)or radar tower Option 3 (completely remove the radar tower), the following mitigation measure is required: MROSD will use the radar tower foundation or footprint to provide a setting for interpretive media in order to illustrate the topics of U.S. Military history, the Cold War, and the role of NORAD, the Almaden AFS, and the servicemen stationed there in national security. Media could include the following:interpretive panels Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District io Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings showcasing period photographs of the operational AFS and servicemen stationed there, including photos of the site showing its visibility from far distances,oral histories provided by surviving veterans,interpretive panels exhibiting major political events of the Cold War,and/or inclusion as part of a self guided tour(via GPS/Smart technology or other means)illustrating the former structures and activities associated with different areas of the project site. Veterans and other community members will be invited to participate in the specific design and content of the interpretive features. Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts associated with historic resources. This impact would remain less-than-significant. Significant Effect: Impact 4.2-3:Construction-Related Impacts on Presently Undocumented Cultural Resources Because the project is located in an area where unknown current) burl "unique" "historical"ed u ue orresources p J (currently ) q (per CEQA criteria) could be encountered during project implementation, including summit improvements and any activities associated with the tower options, disturbances of such resources would constitute a potentially significant impact. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measures that will reduce discovery of undocumented cultural resource impacts to less-than-significant levels: Mitigation Measure 4.2-3—Protection of Undocumented Cultural Resources During all ground-related construction activities(i.e., grading, excavation, etc.)on the project site, if cultural materials(e.g., unusual amounts of shell, animal bone, glass, ceramics,structure/building remains)are inadvertently encountered, all work shall stop within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find.A reasonable effort will be made by the District to avoid or minimize harm to the discovery until significance is determined and an appropriate treatment can be identified and implemented. Methods to protect finds include fencing and covering remains with protective material such as culturally sterile soil or plywood. If vandalism is a threat,24-hour security will be considered and evaluated based on threat level, remoteness of site, materials found,significance of find, etc. Construction operations outside 50 feet of the find can continue during the significance evaluation period and while mitigation is being carried out,however, if the archaeologist determines that the nature of the find may signify a high potential for other finds in the area, the construction will be monitored by an archaeologist within 100 feet of the find. If a discovered resource is identified as significant and cannot be avoided, a qualified archaeologist will develop an appropriate treatment plan to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects. The District will not proceed with construction activities within 100 feet of the find until the treatment plan has been reviewed and approved by the General Manager. The treatment effort required to mitigate the inadvertent exposure of significant cultural and/or historical resources will be guided by a research design appropriate to the discovery and potential research data inherent in the resource in association with suitable field techniques and analytical strategies. The recovery effort will be detailed in a professional report in accordance with current professional standards. Any non-grave associated artifacts will be curated with an appropriate repository. Project construction documents shall include a Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 11 Statement of Findings g requirement that project personnel shall not collect cultural and/or historical resources encountered during construction. This measure is consistent with federal guideline 36 CFR 800.13(a)for invoking unanticipated discoveries. Prior to any trail construction, MROSD will hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a pre-construction survey of the proposed trail alignments. if any potential archaeological resources are identified during the survey, and are found to be significant, the archaeologist shall recommend avoidance measures to ensure that no impacts result from trail construction or trail operation. If the found resource cannot be avoided, the archaeologist shall prepare a treatment plan, as described above. Implementation of this mitigation measure would ensure that potential undocumented cultural resource impacts would be addressed. Resources would be protected,and an archaeologist would ensure that any resources that are uncovered are treated in accordance with CEQA's and federal requirements.Therefore,this potentially significant traffic impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. Significant Effect: Impact 4.2-4:Construction-Related impacts on Presently Undocumented Human Remains Because construction activities associated with the project, including summit improvements and the potential p 1 g p tower options, could potentially result in the disturbance of presently undocumented prehistoric or historic-era interments, human remains, and/or associated grave-related articles,this impact would be potentially significant. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measures that will reduce discovery of undocumented human remains to less-than-significant levels: Mitigation Measure 4.2-4—Protection of Presently Undocumented Human Remains. In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are uncovered during ground- disturbing activities, potentially damaging excavation in the area of the burial will be halted and the Santa Clara County Coroner and a professional archaeologist will be contacted to determine the nature and extent of the remains. The MROSD Project Manager will also be notified immediately. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or state lands(Health and Safety Code,Section 7050.5[b]). if the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, he or she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)by phone within 24 hours of making that determination(Health and Safety Code,Section 7050[c]). Following the coroner's findings, the State of California,project contractor, an archaeologist, and the NAHC- designated Most Likely Descendant(MLD)will determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed. The responsibilities for acting upon notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District iz Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project I Statement of Findings The State of California will ensure that the immediate vicinity(according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices)is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the MLD has taken place. The MLD will have 48 hours to complete a site inspection and make recommendations after being granted access to the site.A range of possible treatments for the remains, including nondestructive removal and analysis,preservation in place, relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants, or other culturally appropriate treatment may be discussed.Assembly Bill (AB)2641 suggests that the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains.AB 2641(e)includes a list of site protection measures and states that the landowner shall implement one or more of the following measures: Y record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, i> utilize an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, and/or record a document with the county in which the property is located. The landowner or their authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identify a MLD, or if the MLD fails to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site. The landowner or their authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if they reject the recommendation of the MLD, and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Implementation of this mitigation measure would ensure that potential impacts related to the discovery of undocumented human remains would be addressed. Resources would be protected in accordance with State law, and all processes laid out by the NAHC would be followed.Therefore,this potentially significant traffic impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. b. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significant Effect:Impact 4.3-1,Loss of Bat Colonies During Building Demolition. Implementation of the proposed project involves demolition of existing abandoned buildings and other structures, including potentially,the tower(depending on the option selected).These buildings provide potential roost structures for common and special-status bats. Demolition, sealing, or other construction activities at these facilities could result in disturbance to active bat colonies that could affect the survival of young or adult bats. Loss of an active bat colony would be considered a significant impact. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects to special-status bat species. Mitigation Measure 4.3-1 Conduct Survey before Structure Demolition,Consult with DFG,and Develop Exclusion Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 13 I i Statement of Findings Methods and Compensatory Mitigation if Appropriate. Surveys for roosting bats on the project site will be conducted by a qualified biologist.Surveys will consist of a daytime pedestrian survey looking for evidence of bat use(e.g.,guano)and/or an evening emergence survey to note the presence or absence of bats. The type of survey will depend on the condition of the buildings.If no bat roosts are found, then no further study is required. If evidence of bat use is observed,the number and species of bats using the roost will be determined.Bat detectors may be used to supplement survey efforts,but are not required. if roosts of pallid, Townsend's big-eared,or western mastiff bats are determined to be present and must be removed,the bats will be excluded from the roosting site before the facility is removed.A program addressing compensation,exclusion methods,and roost removal procedures will be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation. Exclusion methods may include use of one-way doors at roost entrances(bats may leave but not reenter), or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats. Exclusion efforts may be restricted during periods of sensitive activity(e.g.,during hibernation or while females in maternity colonies are nursing young). The loss of each roost(if any)will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction and installation of bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site.Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites.MROSD has successfully constructed bat boxes elsewhere that have subsequently been occupied by bats. Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site, the structures may be removed or sealed. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce significant impacts to bat colonies to a less-than- significant level by surveying for bats prior to disturbance to potential roosting habitat, and minimizing impacts if they are present by providing alternative roost habitat and excluding the bats from the roost habitat to be removed. Significant Effect:Impact 4.3-2,Loss of Special-status Species During Trail Construction,Road Improvements,or Other Ground-Disturbing Activities. Implementation of the overall project, including summit improvmements, could result in the degradation of habitat and loss of several special-status species, including rare plants,special-status amphibians and reptiles, and nesting birds. Special-status species are protected under ESA,CESA,California Fish and Game Code,CEQA or other regulations. Ground-disturbing activities related trail construction, road improvements,or other construction activities could result in a substantial adverse effect on these species.Therefore,the potential loss of special-status species is considered a significant impact. I Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects to special-status species. Mitigation Measure 4.3-2(a)-Conduct Special-status Plant Surveys,Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures,or Provide Compensatory Mitigation. III Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 14 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings Known populations of Loma Prieta hoita and Mt.Hamilton fountain thistle shall be protected during road improvements.As directed by a qualified biologist,the populations shall be fenced before construction with high- visibility fencing and an adequate buffer so that direct and indirect impacts would be minimized.Construction personnel shall be instructed to keep project activities out of the fenced areas. A qualified botanist shall periodically inspect the fencing to ensure that the fence is intact and the impacts to the populations are being avoided. Indirect impacts(i.e.,changes in hydrology)shall be minimized by placing culverts away from any plant populations, if necessary. MROSD shall utilize a qualified botanist to conduct protocol-level preconstruction special-status plant surveys for all potentially occurring species within the project footprint that has not previously been surveyed(e.g., trail connections,staging area expansion).Prior to ground-disturbance in potentially suitable habitat,surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate blooming period when they are most readily identifiable in accordance with Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities(DFG 2009). If no special-status plants are found during focused surveys,the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report,and no further mitigation shall be required. If special-status plant populations are found in the project footprint,MROSD shall determine if the population can be avoided by adjusting the trail alignment or project design. If the impact cannot be avoided,MROSD shall consult with DFG and USFWS,as appropriate depending on species status,to determine the appropriate measures to minimize direct and indirect impacts on any special-status plant population that could occur as a result of project implementation.Mitigation measures may include preserving and enhancing existing populations,creation of off-site populations on project mitigation sites through seed collection or transplantation,and/or restoring or creating suitable habitat in sufficient quantities to achieve no net loss of occupied habitat or individuals. Mitigation Measure 4.3-2(b)-Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Amphibians and Reptiles Although the impact to special-status amphibians or reptiles is expected to be minimal due to a lack of suitable aquatic habitat along ridgelines and headwaters of creeks,MROSD shall implement the following measures to reduce impacts during construction of trail connections: y Construction of the trail across drainages and streams shall occur when the drainages are dry,unless it is not feasible to do so,in which case the following measures shall also be applied. r Guidelines shall be implemented to protect water quality and prevent erosion,as outlined in MROSD's Road and Trail Typical Design Specifications(MROSD 2008). Y If water is present during construction,disturbance to pools and slow runs with cobble-sized substrate shall be minimized.In particular,rocks shall not be collected from in-water environments from late March to early September to avoid disturbing frog egg masses,tadpoles,and turtle hatchlings. Mitigation Measure 4.3-2(c)-Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Golden Eagle,White-tailed Kite,and Other Nesting Birds. To minimize potential disturbance to nesting birds,project activities shall occur during the non-breeding season (September 16-February 14),unless it is not feasible to do so,in which case the following measures shall also be applied. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 15 Statement of Findings During trail construction,road improvements,and other activities, removal of trees greater than 6 inches dbh shall be limited to the greatest degree possible. if construction activity is scheduled to occur during the nesting season(February 15 to September 15),MROSD shall utilize a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 500 feet of the project site that could be affected by project construction. The surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no more than 3o days before the beginning of construction in a particular area. If no nests are found,no further mitigation is required. if active nests are found,impacts on nesting raptors and songbirds shall be avoided by establishment of appropriate buffers around the nests.No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that any young have fledged or the nest is no longer active.A 50o-foot buffer around raptor nests and 50-foot buffer around songbird nests are generally adequate to protect them from disturbance,but the size of the buffer may be adjusted by a qualified biologist in consultation with DFG depending on site specific conditions.Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after demolition activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce significant impacts associated with potential impacts to special-status species to a less-than-significant level by surveying for their presence prior to construction and implementing avoidance and/or minimization measures and compensating for any loss of habitat. Significant Effect:Impact 4.3-3,Loss of Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive Natural Communities and Fill of Waters of the U.S.during Trail Construction. Although trails for the overall project are expected be located along ridgelines where wetlands and riparian areas are less likely to occur,construction of new trails to connect with other existing trails could require crossing minor seeps or creeks. Trail construction could require removal of riparian and wetland vegetation and could result in the placement of fill material into waters of the U.S. This is considered a potentially significant impact. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on riparian habitat and other sensitive communities,as well as Waters of the U.S. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects on riparian habitat and other sensitive communities, as well as Waters of the U.S.: Mitigation Measure 4.3-3,Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Sensitive Natural Communities and Compensate for Loss of Riparian and Wetland Habitats. As a first priority,MROSD will seek to avoid wetlands impacts through trail realignment,bridging,and other avoidance measures. Before any groundbreaking activity along the trail connections,MROSD shall have a jurisdictional wetland delineation conducted by a qualified wetland specialist in sensitive areas that cannot be avoided. The preliminary Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 16 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings delineation shall be submitted to USACE for verification. The wetlands may be subject to DFG regulation under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code.No grading,fill,or other ground disturbing activities shall occur until all required permits,regulatory approvals,and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats are secured. If the wetlands are determined to be subject to USACE jurisdiction,the project may qualify for use of Nationwide Permit 42 for construction of recreational trails if certain criteria are met. For those wetlands that cannot be avoided,MROSD shall commit to replace,restore,or enhance on a"no net loss"basis(in accordance with USACE, RWQCB,and DFG)the acreage of all wetlands and other waters of the U.S.that would be removed,lost,and/or degraded with project implementation.Wetland habitat shall be restored,enhanced,and/or replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE,RWQCB,and DFG,as appropriate,depending on agency jurisdiction,and as determined during the permitting processes. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce significant impacts associated with loss of riparian habitat and fill of waters of the U.S.to a less-than-significant level by providing replacement, restoration or enhancement habitat of equal or greater value. Significant Effect:Impact 4.3-4,Effects of Increased Recreation on Native Species and Interference with Wildlife Movement. Implementation of the overall proposed project would result in public access to wildlife habitats that previously have had limited human disturbance. Proposed trail connections would provide recreational opportunities for hikers, mountain bikers,and equestrians. Proposed hang glider launch sites would provide facilities for hang gliders. Hiking, mountain biking, horseback riding,and hang glider launching/landing are unlikely to substantially adversely affect native terrestrial wildlife or plant communities.The construction and use of trails are also not likely to substantially interfere with wildlife movement in the region.-However, birds,especially nesting raptors, have been known to exhibit aggressive or agitated behavior in response to perceived aerial intruders such as hang gliders, particularly during the breeding season.This behavior signifies a disturbance. Allowing a recreational use that results in the disturbance of local wildlife is not consistent with MROSD policy. It is unknown if local bird species might react this way to the proposed hang gliding activities.Without an appropriate adaptive management strategy,this impact is considered potentially significant. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects to raptors and other bird species due to hang gliding. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects to raptors and other bird species due to hang gliding: Mitigation Measure 4.3-4 MROSD will take the following actions to educate hang glider pilots and other visitors regarding the potential to disturb birds,especially nesting raptors and vultures,and establish an incident reporting program: ! Hang glider permits will include a brochure prepared by a qualified ornithologist that describes agitated and defensive behavior of wildlife,focusing mostly on soaring birds,such as raptors and vultures. The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 17 Statement of Findings permit will include a map that identifies protected air space that restricts hang gliding within a minimum of i,000 feet of a known nest. Hang glider permits will include an agreement,to be signed by the pilot,that the pilot shall: — Respect local wildlife by maintaining appropriate distance and altitude(as safety permits)to minimize disturbance. — Watch for activ%ccupied raptor or vulture nests and communal roosts,and,if spotted, keep at least 1,000 feet clear. — Avoid approaching soaring birds. (Note that if a bird peacefully approaches a hang glider, this is not considered a disturbance.) — Report to MROSD any bird observed behaving aggressively or agitated as a result of the pilot's glider or any other glider. — immediately leave the area(as safety permits)after a bird has exhibited aggressive or acutely agitated behavior. MROSD will post signs at hang glider observation locations describing aggressive or acutely agitated bird behavior,and encourage preserve users to report any of these observations to the provided telephone number. MROSD will implement an adaptive management plan,prepared b aqualified ornithologist, to monitor and mitigate P P 9 p P p Y 9 9 observed agitation or potential disturbance to birds. The adaptive management plan will include(at a minimum)the following measures: ➢ MROSD staff will immediately investigate and document any legitimate reported incident of bird i aggression or acute agitation in response to presence of a hang glider. MROSD staff will review these bird incident records continuously. If incidents in a specific area exceed three per month,MROSD will either reduce the number of hang gliding permits issued to 5 at one time with no more than z hang gliders per launch site or restrict the use of the affected area as a condition of the special use permit.(Note that if the excess number of incidents occurs only during the raptor nesting season,then the permit reduction may be limited only to March through August and may resume to normal permitting levels after the nesting season.) If repeated incidents occur with a specific hang glider or group,MROSD may revoke hang gliding privileges to those individuals. If,after ter reducing the number of permits or restricting the use of specific areas where the incidents have occurred, the bird incidents are not reduced below three per month,MROSD will consider discontinuance of the issuance of hang gliding permits at the project site. Significant impacts associated with disturbance to birds from hang gliding activities and subsequent inconsistency with MROSD policy would be reduced to a less-than-significant level by educating hang glider pilots and other visitors of the potential disturbance for birds, by establishing an incident reporting program, and by monitoring incidents and taking appropriate action to reduce any increased agitation levels in native birds and raptors resulting from proposed hang gliding activities. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 18 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings c. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITYp GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant Effect:Impacts 4.4-1 and 4.5-2,Potential Short-Term Construction-Related Soil Erosion and Water Quality Impairment. Project construction activities for the overall project, including summit improvements and tower options other than "retain and seal", could generate sediment, erosion, and other nonpoint source pollutants in on-site stormwater,which could drain to off-site areas. On-site earthmoving and soil stockpiling activities could result in sheet erosion during rain events. This would be a potentially significant impact. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment related to construction-related soil erosion and water quality impairment. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects to soil erosion and water quality impairment: Mitigation Measure 4.4-i—Reduction of Erosion a. Prior to earthmovingactivities,MROSD will consult with Santa Clara Count Department o Public Works Y p f for Municipal Regional Permit review and will also consult with the San Francisco BayBasin Regional Water Quality Q g Y Control Board(RWQCB)to acquire the appropriate regulatory approvals that may be required to obtain Section 401 water quality certification,State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB)statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)stormwater permit for general construction activities,and any other necessary site-specific waste discharge requirements. No grading or other soil disturbance will occur until the appropriate regulatory approvals and permits have been issued. b. Prior to any earthmoving activities,as required under the NPDES stormwater permit for general construction activity,MROSD will prepare and submit the appropriate Notice of Intent and prepare the SWPPP and other necessary engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control. The SWPPP will identify and specify the use of erosion sediment control BMPs,means of waste disposal,nonstormwater management controls,permanentpost-construction BMPs and inspection and maintenance ntenance responsibilities. The SWPPP will also specify the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction and that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges. C. Construction techniques will be identified that would reduce the potential runoff,and the SWPPP will identify the erosion and sedimentation control measure to be implemented.BMPs designed to reduce erosion of exposed soil may include,but are not limited to: Use temporary mulching,seeding,or other suitable stabilization measures to protect uncovered soils; Store materials and equipment to ensure that spills or teaks cannot enter the storm drain system or surface water; Water exposed areas for dust control; Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project tg Statement of Findings Y Minimize off-site sediment transport on vehicles using techniques such as gravel driving surfaces to knock soil off tires at exit points;and r Use barriers,such as perimeter silt fencing,to minimize the amount of uncontrolled runoff that could enter drains or surface waters. d. The SWPPP will also specify spill prevention and contingency measures,identify types of materials used for equipment operation,and identify measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous materials used for equipment operation. Emergency procedures for responding to spills will also be identified. The SWPPP will identify personnel training requirements and procedures that would be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation and performance inspection methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP. The SWPPP will also identify the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP. All construction contractors will be required to retain a copy of the approved SWPPP on the construction site. Implementation of the mitigation measures above would ensure that runoff and sediment is controlled. These actions would reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. Significant Effect:Impact 4.4-3,water Quality Impacts(During Project Operation). While most facilities and activities at the project site would not result in adverse water quality impacts,the project would result in vehicles parking in designated unpaved areas. Specific water quality protection measures have not been identified to prevent the discharge of pollutants in stormwater on-or off-site from these parking areas. Therefore,the project could result in potentially significant water quality impacts. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment related to water quality impairment during project operation. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects to water quality impairment: Mitigation Measure 4.4-3—Design Measures MROSD will implement appropriate design measures to adequately trap and treat discharged pollutants in designated parking areas. These design measures could include,but are not limited to structural and non- structural BMPs including installation of oil and grit separators to capture potential contaminates that are discharged in parking areas,establishment of vegetation in drainages to achieve optimal balance of conveyance and water quality protection;and installation of vegetation filter strips. With implementation of this mitigation,adequate measures would be in place to protect water quality; therefore,this impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 20 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings d. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Significant Effect:Impact 4.5-1,Risks to People and Structures from Seismic Hazards or Landslides. Option i.Retain and seal entire Tower structure Option 1 for the radar tower is to retain the structure onsite. Although the tower would be sealed to prevent any public access,the tower is a massive concrete structure and could pose hazards to users of the open space area if the structural integrity is not appropriate to withstand geologic phenomena,such as earthquakes. Under the option for retaining the radar tower,the District is proposing several improvements recommended by a structural engineer to increase the radar tower's structural integrity. These improvements will bring the building to a collapse prevention level to allow visitors to safely access the radar tower site. There has been ground disturbance and deterioration to slopes adjoining the radar tower, but deterioration has been slow and there is no imminent danger to the building foundation; however, long-term deterioration of the slope could eventually pose a threat to the structure. This is considered a potentially significant impact. Options 2 and 3(Tower Removal Options) The project includes primarily demolition of existing structures,environmental restoration,and development of open space facilities, including trail connections. The removal of the existing dilapidated structure would remove existing structural hazards from the project site by creating either an open-air structure or no structure. However,the potential for the slope south of the radar tower to slump could pose a danger to the public,even if the radar tower is removed. Therefore implementation of tower Options 2 and 3 could result in a potentially P P p Y significant impact. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment related to seismic hazards and landslide risk. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects associated with seismic hazards and landslide risk: Mitigation Measure 4.5-1(Radar Tower Option t Only) Prior to completion of the proposed landform and environmental restoration,MROSD will utilize a qualified geotechnical engineer to conduct monitoring of the north and south slopes. if the qualified geotechnical engineer indicates that slope instability is jeopardizing the radar tower,then the MROSD will implement recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer including drainage rehabilitation and slope reinforcement(i.e.retaining walls). Implementation of these recommendations will ensure that slope subsidence does not occur that would affect the structural integrity of the tower. If the proposed landform and environmental restoration is completed prior to any actions recommended b the monitoring geotechnical engineer,MROSD will utilize a qualified geotechnical Y , gg g q f engineer to conduct a topographical survey based on the new contours. If the geotechnical engineer determines that additional slope stabilization measures are necessary(i.e. retaining wall)to ensure no risk of structural collapse,MROSD will implement these measures. As part of the proposed project,construction safety fencing will be erected,prior to structural stabilization of the tower,at a distance equal to the height of the structure(in this case,a distance of 8o feet from the base of the tower)in order to allow public access to the area. Prior to implementation of the approved radar tower option Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 21 Statement of Findings and removal of the chain link fence from around the radar tower,MROSD will install permanent fencing along edges of the steep slopes in the vicinity of the radar tower. The fencing will include materials consistent with a natural open space setting typical of fencing used in other MROSD preserves and open space facilities. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.5-1(Radar Tower Option Only)would reduce the potential for future erosion and subsidence by conducting slope monitoring and ensuring that appropriate slope stabilization measures are implemented either as a result of the proposed landform and environmental restoration and/or by additional stabilization measures (i.e., retaining wall). Furthermore, installation of permanent fencing around steep slopes would reduce potential slope-instability-related impacts to open space users walking or standing near the edges of the slopes. This would reduce impacts associated with landslides to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation Measure 4.5-1(Radar Tower Option 2 and 3 Only) Prior to implementation of the approved radar tower option and removal of the chain link fence from around the radar tower,MROSD will install permanent fencing along edges of the steep slopes in the vicinity of the radar tower. The fencing will include materials consistent with a natural open space setting typical of fencing used in other MROSD preserves and open space facilities. Installation of permanent fencing around steep slopes would reduce potential slope-instability-related impacts to open space users walking or standing near the edges of the slopes. This would reduce impacts associated with landslides to a less-than-significant level. e. PUBLIC HEALTH AND HAZARDS Significant Effect:Impact 4.6-1:Exposure to Existing Hazardous Materials. Small quantities of asbestos were documented in the shallow soils around the existing structures, including the tower. Pesticides were also identified above acceptable levels. Excavation and construction activities in the area could result in the exposure of construction workers and the general public to existing hazardous materials contamination.This impact is considered significant. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by the MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment related to exposure to existing hazardous materials. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce to less-than-significant levels effects associated with existing hazardous materials: Mitigation Measure 4.6-t—Remediation Plan Following demolition of structures,but prior to any grading activity or public access within the former Almaden Air Force Station,MROSD will hire a qualified hazardous materials specialist to prepare a focused pesticide soil testing and remediation program. The soil testing program will be prepared according to the recommendations in Northgate's Sampling and Analysis Report. Based on the focused soil testing program, the perimeters and depths of soils containing contamination above residential ESI-s shall be specifically defined.Once these areas are defined, i Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 22 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings construction barriers or fencing shall be placed around the areas prior to initiating construction within other areas of the project site. No construction or public access may occur within the demarcated areas of contamination until the following remediation occurs: The qualified hazardous materials specialist will prepare a remediation plan for excavation and disposal of contaminated soils. The goal of the remediation plan will be to remove all soils containing chemical concentrations in excess of California human health screening levels and render excavated soil suitable for disposal at an appropriate landfill, unless the soils can be suitably treated on site, to below screening levels, in which case the soils can be disposed onsite. Soil removal activity will be completed in accordance with state and local regulatory requirements that provide specific targets for protection of human health. Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce potential hazards associated with exposure of construction workers and the public to contaminated soil to a less-than-significant level by requiring a testing program.This program would identify the area of contamination, restrict construction activities within those areas, and remediate those contaminated areas consistent with state and federal regulations before any construction or access within those areas is allowed. Less than Significant Effect:Impact 4.6-5:Exposure of People or Structures to Wildland Fires. Even though more people would use the site than under existing conditions,and it is generally recognized that the potential for ignition is higher with increased visitorship,the overall potential for ignition is decreased when comparing the effects of placing legitimate users in a site with current abundant illegal use. The proposed project would reduce existing potential for ignition of a wildfire by legitimizing public use of the site and patrolling or monitoring user activities,thereby substantially restricting common ignition sources. Implementation of the project would result in a less-than-significant impact. Finding Although mitigation is not required to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level, MROSD has nevertheless required changes or alterations in the project by the IVIROSD that that further reduce this impact. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measures that will further reduce this already less-than- significant impact associated with wildland fires: Mitigation Measure 4.6-5—Reduction of Wildland Fire Hazard MROSD will implement the following fire hazard minimization measures recommended by Wildland Resource Management: Construction-Related Fire Risk Reduction Prior to initiation of construction(including activities associated with mitigation measures,such as vegetation clearing), MROSD's contractor will prepare afire prevention plan. This fire prevention plan will include such measures as a list of tools to have on hand,proof of spark arrestors on all gas-powered engines, a description of available communications,specifications for the supply of water to have on hand,and descriptions of other actions that will reduce the risk of ignition and immediate control of an incipient fire. This requirement should be included in the contract with the District. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 23 Statement of Findings To minimize the risk of wildfire ignition,all motorized vehicles,including earth-moving equipment, used during this project will be equipped with spark arresters,per California Public Resources Code 4442,and Health and Safety Code 13001 and 13005. Other motorized vehicles used on the project site will not be parked where vegetation may come in contact with exhaust systems and catalytic converters. Fuel Management and Fire-safe Restoration Design Prior to initiating construction of the restoration areas, MROSD will prepare a site-specific fuel management plan for these areas as part of the specific site planning and design that dictates which species of trees/shrubs should be removed or pruned, and which plants should be planted or maintained(i.e.,conifers may be replaced with hardwoods to reduce the chance of torching and ember production and distribution). The plan will include measures above and beyond MROSD's standard fuel management plan,such as a strategically located visitor safety zone, which includes fuel conditions appropriate for a safety zone(i.e., large paved or graveled area such as a parking lot). This area will need to be inspected at least annually for compliance. The site-specific fuel management plan will apply to the former AFS housing area where the environmental restoration is proposed. The fuel management plan will also identify indigenous plant materials and/or seed mixes at staging areas or along trails. Indigenous plants are ideal due to their low maintenance and drought and fire resistant characteristics. The vegetation palette for the proposed restoration will identify native species that are shrubby or non-curing herbaceous cover as op posed pposed to grassy species), with little ignition potential. Plantings will be irrigated at least twice during the summer season to keep the moisture of the vegetation foliage high(keeping the dead material wet is not effective),if plantings cannot be irrigated twice a year,fuel volume will be reduced to meet the equivalent results in fire hazard. The spacing and design of the vegetation is more critical than the species planted. The restoration design will place plant species such that appropriate horizontal spacing occurs between masses of shrubs and specimen trees and appropriate vertical spacing will occur between tree branches,shrubs,and ground cover. This will discourage the creation of'fuel ladders"—a continuous fuel path by which a fire can climb from the ground to a shrub, to a tree,and ultimately produce and distribute embers than can start new fires far away. The restoration design will identify a palette of appropriate native plant species that have a low fuel volume and high foliar moisture and do not have a tendency to produce and"hold"dead wood and which also have a proper growth form. Factors that must be considered in rating the fire performance of plants include: y Total volume. The greater the volume of plant material(potential fuel)present,the greater the fire hazard. Moisture content. The moisture content of plants is an important consideration;high levels of plant moisture can both lower fire risk and act as a heat sink if a fire occurs,reducing its intensity and spread. Y Arnount_anddi ri iq-n_of dead matt_r . The amount of dead material in a given plant influences the total amount of water in the overall plant;the dead material is usually much drier than living tissue. Whereas dead material rarely has a moisture content higher than 25%,live foliage moisture content ranges from 6o to 8o%for chaparral species in xeric conditions to a high Of 200 to 400%for succulent plants or plants under irrigation. Size of leaves.twi s n Ibranches. Materials with large surface areas(such as needles,twigs,or large flat leaves)dry more rapidly under fire conditions than materials with lower surface ratios(such as branches and fleshy leaves). Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 24 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings r C—eQmetry-on-d arrangement-Q.f th�plant veral sr . I dis ributio�in o f th-ebiD—mass�The shape of a plant and the way in which the biomass is distributed throughout the plant is important because this bulk density affects the air flow and heat transfer through the plant. The arrangement of material within the plant affects its fuel continuity and its tendency to undergo preheating and promote fire spread. Examples of plants that may be appropriate include(but are not limited to)the following:coffeeberry, madrone, coast live oak, bay, ceanothus,and toyon. Examples of species to remove include coyote brush, black sage, and sagebrush. The fuel management plan will include a maintenance component. The maintenance program will require annual removal of dead material and maintenance of the vertical and horizontal spaces that create afire-safe design. Maintenance requirements are incorporated in the District guidelines. Implementation of the above mitigation measures would reduce potential wildland fires. This impact would remain less-than-significant. f. AIR QUALITY Potentially Significant Effect:Impact 4.7-1,Generation of Construction Emissions of NOX and PMio. Construction activities associated with the project, including summit improvements and the tower options, would generate exhaust and evaporative emissions of ozone precursors, Reactive Organic Gases (ROG)and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX), Particulate Matter under 10 microns(PM10) exhaust,and Particulate Matter under 2.5 microns (PM2.5) exhaust. Construction-generated emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10 exhaust, and PM2.5 i exhaust would not exceed Bay Area Air Quality Management District's(BAAQMD's) respective quantitative thresholds.Therefore,construction-generated emissions of ROG and NOX, PM10exhaust,and PM2.5 exhaust would not substantially contribute to emissions concentrations that exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)or California Ambient Air Quality Standards(CAAQS) and would not violate or contribute substantially to the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin's(SFBAAB's) nonattainment status with respect to ozone or particulate matter. However, emissions of fugitive PM10 dust(not exhaust,as described above)emitted during demolition,excavation,earth movement,and other ground disturbance activities would be substantial.Thus, construction-related emissions of fugitive dust(PM10 and PM2.5)could violate or contribute substantially to the SFBAABs nonattainment status with respect to PM10 and PM2.5,expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and/or conflict with air quality planning efforts.This would be a significant impact. Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project b MROSD that mitigate or avoid 1 Y g the significant effects on the environment related to construction emissions. Facts in Supportof Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce the potential effects related to construction emissions to less-than-significant levels: Mitigation Measure 4.7-1 MROSD and all construction contractors shall implement the following basic control measures during construction, per BAAQMD's Air Quality Guidelines: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 25 f Statement of Findings I Y All un-compacted exposed surfaces(e.g.,parking areas,staging areas,soil piles,graded areas,and unpaved access roads)shall either be watered two times per day when average winds exceed zo miles per hour(mph)or covered with a dust palliative(e.g., mulch,straw). if watered,watering shall be done at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture Of 12%.Moisture content can be verified by lab samples or moisture probe. Y All haul trucks transporting soil,sand,demolished building materials,or other loose material off-site shall be covered. v Erosion control seed mix shall be planted in disturbed areas where appropriate as soon as possible and watered as needed for up to three years. During windy days,the simultaneous occurrence of excavation,grading,and ground-disturbing construction activities on the some area at any one time shall be limited.Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time. r All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. I y All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. All roadways,driveways,and sidewalks that are planned as part of the project to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible.Any building pads shall be laid as soon as possible aftergrading unless seeding or soil binders are used. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes(as required by the California airborne toxics control measures(ATCM)Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations[CCR]).Clear signage about this requirement shall be provided for construction workers and truck drivers at all access points. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce potential emissions impacts so they are below BAAQMD thresholds. This would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. Potentially Significant Effect:Impact 4.7-5,Exposure of Sensitive Receptor to Fugitive Dust Emissions Containing Naturally Occurring Asbestos(NOA). During construction-related earth movement activities, including summit improvements and all tower options (removal or retain and seal which requires geotechnical remediation)serpentine soils may be disturbed. Without appropriate controls, nearby sensitive receptors could be exposed to localized high levels of re- entrained fugitive PM10 dust, potentially including NOA.As a result,this impact would be considered potentially significant. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 26 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Statement of Findings Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment related to NOA. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce the potential effects related to NOA to a less-than-significant level: Mitigation Measure 4.7-5 Utilizing a qualified geologist,project-related construction and grading would be sited to avoid ultrama f is rock to the maximum extent feasible. if construction or grading in ultrama fic substrates would be unavoidable,MROSD shall conduct an investigation to determine whether and where NOA is present.The site investigation shall include the collection of soil and rock samples by a qualified geologist.If the site investigation determines that NOA is present on the project site then MROSD shall comply with the requirements of SAAQMD's naturally occurring asbestos program by submitting an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Application and any other applicable notification forms to BAAQMD pursuant to BAAQMD's Air Toxic Control Measure(ATCM)Inspection Guidelines Policies and Procedures.Completion of the Asbestos Dust Mitigation Application largely consists of the development of an asbestos dust control plan, which specifies measures for preventing or minimizing the generation of NOA- containing dust associated with track-out onto paved public roads,active storage piles,inactive disturbed surfaces and storage piles,traffic fic on un-paved surfaces and roads,earthmoving activities,off-site transport of materials, and stabilization of disturbed soil surfaces post construction.In order to fulfill the requirements of Section 93105 of the California Health and Safety Code,"Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction,Grading, Quarrying,and Surface Mining Operations,"the asbestos dust control plan shall specify measures,such as periodic watering to reduce airborne dust and ceasing construction during high winds,that shall be taken to ensure that no visible dust crosses the property line.Measures in the Asbestos Dust Control Plan may include but shall not be limited to dust control measures required by Mitigation Measure 4.7-1.MROSD shall submit the plan to BAAQMD for review and approval before construction.Upon approval of the asbestos dust control plan by BAAQMD,the MROSD shall ensure that construction contractors implement the terms of the plan throughout the construction period. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.7-5 would minimize the potential for area residents to be exposed to airborne NOA dust,and this impact would be reduced to a less-than-significant level. g. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Potentially Significant Effect, Impact 4.10-1,Construction Traffic. Overall project construction activities would generate traffic associated with the delivery of materials and equipment to the project site and construction worker trips. In addition,trucks would be a safety concern for bike riders along these roads.Therefore,this impact would be considered potentially significant. Mid peninsula Regional pOpen Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 27 Statement of Findings Finding Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project by MROSD that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment related to construction traffic. Facts in Support of Finding The MROSD has adopted the following mitigation measure that will reduce construction traffic to a less-than- I significant level: Mitigation Measure 4.lo-1—Construction Traffic MROSD shall implement the following mitigation measures to improve roadway condition/operation during and after construction. These measures would be required with or without removal of the radar tower. Improve and repave Mt. Umunhum Road to increase vehicle accessibility after completion of demolition. In the interim,provide necessary temporary improvements(e.g.pothole repairs). Y Survey the demolition truck route between Mt. Umunhum Road and Almaden Expressway(or Camden Avenue)before project initiation and after all work is completed.Provide repair as required to all road segments with documented pavement degradation due to project trucks. Post signs along the narrower two-lane sections of construction haul routes informing bike riders as well as local drivers of dates and times of potential truck traffic. Post signs of potential delay in advance of construction/excavation sites along Mt.Umunhum Road. Ensure communication links between truck drivers so they are aware when there will be uphill and downhill truck traffic at the same time on Mt.Umunhum Road and/or Hicks Road. Survey Mt.Umunhum Road on a weekly basis during all demolition off haul,excavated material haul and any fill importation to determine whether pavement condition remains adequate in all locations along Mt. Umunhum Road for safe truck traffic activity.If not,provide interim pavement repairs as needed. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce potential safety impacts during construction activities. This would reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. 1.9 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN CEQA Section 21081.6 requires that when a public agency is making the Findings required by Section 21081,the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. Because mitigation measures have been adopted to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects of the project, a mitigation monitoring Plan has been prepared for the proposed project and is adopted along with these Findings. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 28 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project ATTACHMENT 2 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan for All Phases of the Project i t 1 SPACEEN , s, �s s k s f Y P - PREPARED FOR: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 October 2012 OWN Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Mitigation Monitoring Plan for All Phases of the Project PREPARED FOR: Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 330 Distel Circle Los Altos, CA 94022 CONTACT: Meredith Manning Senior Planner Phone: 650.691.1200 Fax: 650.691.0485 mt.um@openspace.org PREPARED BY: Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 210 Sacramento, CA 95814 www.ascentenvinc.com CONTACT: Gary Jakobs Principal 916.444.7301 October 2012 10010041.01 I INTRODUCTION 1.1 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN In compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines§ 15097(a),when significant effects are identified in an EIR,the Lead Agency is required to adopt a program for reporting or monitoring mitigation measures that were adopted or made conditions of approval for the proposed project. This Mitigation Monitoring Plan(MMP) has been developed for the construction and operation of the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project,consistent with the requirements of§ 15097.The intent of the MMP is to prescribe and enforce a means for properly and successfully implementing the mitigation measures identified within the Environmental Impact Report for this project. Unless otherwise noted,the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD or District)shall be responsible for complying with and funding all mitigation measures identified herein. :.2 COMPLIANCE CHECKL101 The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions.The MMP is intended to be used by District staff and mitigation monitoring personnel to ensure compliance with mitigation measures during project implementation. Mitigation measures identified in this MMP were developed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed project. Note that this MMP reflects all mitigation measures relevant to all three project decisions(June 12`h,September 19`h, and October 171h, 2012.) The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary and in-the-field identification and resolution of environmental concerns. Monitoring and documenting the implementation of mitigation measures will be coordinated by the MROSD. The table attached to this report identifies the mitigation measure,the responsible agency for the monitoring action,and timing of the monitoring action. MROSD will be responsible for fully understanding and effectively implementing the mitigation measures contained within the MMP, and will be responsible for ensuring compliance. During implementation of the project, MROSD will assign an inspector who will be responsible for field monitoring of mitigation measure compliance.The inspector,who could be one or more employees of MROSD with appropriate knowledge,skills,and abilities to carry out inspections,will report to the project manager identified for MROSD and will be thoroughly familiar with permit conditions and the MMP. In addition,the inspector will be familiar with construction contract requirements, construction schedules,standard construction practices,and mitigation techniques. In order to track the status of mitigation measure implementation, field-monitoring activities will be documented on compliance monitoring report worksheets. The time commitment of the inspector will vary depending on the intensity and location of project activities. Aided by the attached table,the inspector will be responsible for the following activities: On-site monitoring of implementation activities as frequently as needed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. i Reviewing construction plans and equipment staging/access plans to ensure conformance with adopted mitigation measures. i Ensuring contractor knowledge of and compliance with the MMP. Verifying the accuracy and adequacy of contract wording. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 1 Mitigation Monitoring Plan Ascent Environmental A Having the authority to require correction of activities that violate mitigation measures.The inspector shall have the ability and authority to secure compliance with the MMP. A Acting in the role of contact for property owners or any other affected persons who wish to register observations of violations of project permit conditions or mitigation. Upon receiving any complaints,the inspector shall immediately contact the construction representative.The inspector shall be responsible for verifying any such observations and for developing any necessary corrective actions in consultation with the construction contractor and MROSD. • Obtaining assistance as necessary from technical experts,as needed, in order to develop site-specific procedures for implementing the mitigation measures. i Maintaining a log of all significant interactions,violations of permit conditions or mitigation measures,and necessary corrective measures. j L3 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN The following table indicates the mitigation measure number,the mitigation measure text,the monitoring agency, implementation timing,and an area to record monitoring compliance. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Monitoring Mitigationi i ' i" Implementation Measure}' i / t Re co Measure 1Schedule rd i 4.2-2 Radar Options 2 and 3 Only MROSD During Project Design (Voluntary) If MROSD selects radar tower Option 1(retain and seal the structure)no further mitigation is necessary. If MROSD selects either radar tower Option 2(demolish but leave the foundation)or radar tower Option 3(completely remove the radar tower),the following mitigation measure is required: MROSD will use the radar tower foundation or footprint to provide a setting for interpretive media in order to illustrate the topics of U.S. Military history,the Cold War,and the role of NORAD,the Almaden AFS,and the servicemen stationed there in national security.Media could include the following: interpretive panels showcasing period photographs of the operational AFS and servicemen stationed there,including photos of the site showing its visibility from far distances;oral histories provided by surviving veterans;interpretive panels exhibiting major political events of the Cold War;and/or inclusion as part of a self guided tour(via GPS/Smart technology or other means)illustrating the former structures and activities associated with different areas of the project site. Veterans and other community members will be invited to participate in the specific design and content of the interpretive features. 4.2-3 Protection of Undocumented Cultural Resources MROSD During Construction During all ground-related construction activities(i.e.,grading,excavation,etc.) on the project site,if cultural materials(e.g.,unusual amounts of shell,animal bone,glass,ceramics,structure/building remains)are inadvertently encountered,all work shall stop within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find.A reasonable effort will be made by the District to avoid or minimize harm to the discovery until significance is determined and an appropriate treatment can be identified and implemented.Methods to protect finds include fencing and covering remains with protective material such as culturally sterile soil or plywood. If vandalism is a threat,24-hour security will be considered and evaluated based on threat level,remoteness of site,materials found,significance of find,etc.Construction operations outside 50-feet of the find can continue during the significance evaluation period and while mitigation is being carried out;however,if the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation w Measure No. Measure Description Schedule ComplianceRecord archaeologist determines that the nature of the find may signify a high potential for other finds in the area,the construction will be monitored by an archaeologist within 100-feet of the find.If a discovered resource is identified as significant and cannot be avoided,a qualified archaeologist will develop an appropriate treatment plan to minimize or mitigate the adverse effects.The District will not proceed with construction activities within 100-feet of the find until the treatment plan has been reviewed and approved by the General Manager.The treatment effort required to mitigate the inadvertent exposure of significant cultural and/or historical resources will be guided by a research design appropriate to the discovery and potential research data inherent in the resource in association with suitable field techniques and analytical strategies. The recovery effort will be detailed in a professional report in accordance with current professional standards. Any non-grave associated artifacts will be curated with an appropriate repository. Project construction documents shall include a requirement that project personnel shall not collect cultural and/or historical resources encountered during construction.This measure is consistent with federal guideline 36 CFR 800.13(a)for invoking unanticipated discoveries. Prior to any trail construction,MROSD will hire a qualified archaeologist to conduct a pre-construction survey of the proposed trail alignments.If any potential archaeological resources are identified during the survey,and are found to be significant,the archaeologist shall recommend avoidance measures to ensure that no impacts result from trail construction or trail operation. If the found resource cannot be avoided,the archaeologist shall prepare a treatment plan,as described above. 4.2-4 Protection of Presently Undocumented Human Remains. MROSD During Construction In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code,if human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities,potentially damaging excavation in the area of the burial will be halted and the Santa Clara County Coroner and a professional archaeologist will be contacted to determine the nature and extent of the remains.The MROSD Project Manager will also be notified immediately. The coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or state lands(Health and Safety Code,Section 7050.5[b]).If the coroner determines that the remains are Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 4 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project I Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigabon MonftodngAgericyImplementation Monitoring DescriptionMeasure Compliance Record Measure No. Schedule those of a Native American,he or she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)by phone within 24 hours of making that determination(Health and Safety Code,Section 7050[c]). Following the coroner's findings,the State of California,project contractor,an archaeologist,and the NAHC-designated Most Likely Descendant(MLD)will determine the ultimate treatment and disposition of the remains and take appropriate steps to ensure that additional human interments are not disturbed.The responsibilities for acting upon notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are identified in Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code. The State of California will ensure that the immediate vicinity(according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards and practices)is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until consultation with the MLD has taken place.The MLD will have 48 hours to complete a site inspection and make recommendations after being granted access to the site.A range of possible treatments for the remains,including nondestructive removal and analysis,preservation in place,relinquishment of the remains and associated items to the descendants,or other culturally appropriate treatment may be discussed.Assembly Bill(AB)2641 suggests that the concerned parties may extend discussions beyond the initial 48 hours to allow for the discovery of additional remains.AB 2641(e)includes a list of site protection measures and states that the landowner shall implement one or more of the following measures: ) record the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center, ) utilize an open-space or conservation zoning designation or easement, and/or ) record a document with the county in which the property is located. The landowner or their authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance if the NAHC is unable to identify a MLD,or if the MLD fails to make a Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan f ormg WdgatiMeasure f f f f i. .If MeasureDescriptionf f Record '1 recommendation within 48 hours after being granted access to the site.The landowner or their authorized representative may also reinter the remains in a location not subject to further disturbance if they reject the recommendation of the MLD,and mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. MEE= 01 I E 4.3-1 Conduct Survey before Structure Demolition,Consult with DFG,and Develop MROSD Prior to Demolition of Exclusion Methods and Compensatory Mitigation if Appropriate. Structures Surveys for roosting bats on the project site will be conducted by a qualified biologist.Surveys will consist of a daytime pedestrian survey looking for evidence of bat use(e.g.,guano)and/or an evening emergence survey to note the presence or absence of bats.The type of survey will depend on the condition of the buildings.If no bat roosts are found,then no further study is required.If evidence of bat use is observed,the number and species of bats using the roost will be determined.Bat detectors may be used to supplement survey efforts,but are not required. If roosts of pallid,Townsend's big-eared,or western mastiff bats are determined to be present and must be removed,the bats will be excluded from the roosting site before the facility is removed.A program addressing compensation,exclusion methods,and roost removal procedures will be developed in consultation with DFG before implementation.Exclusion methods may include use of one-way doors at roost entrances(bats may leave but not reenter),or sealing roost entrances when the site can be confirmed to contain no bats.Exclusion efforts may be restricted during periods of sensitive activity (e.g.,during hibernation or while females in maternity colonies are nursing young).The loss of each roost(if any)will be replaced in consultation with DFG and may include construction and installation of bat boxes suitable to the bat species and colony size excluded from the original roosting site.Roost replacement will be implemented before bats are excluded from the original roost sites. MROSD has successfully constructed bat boxes elsewhere that have subsequently been occupied by bats.Once the replacement roosts are constructed and it is confirmed that bats are not present in the original roost site,the structures may be removed or sealed. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 6 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan MonitoringMitigab y jImplementation Measurei or Measure � Schedule I, 4.3-2(a) Conduct Special-status Plant Surveys,Implement Avoidance and Mitigation MROSD Before Construction Measures,or Provide Compensatory Mitigation. Known populations of Loma Prieta hoita and Mt.Hamilton fountain thistle shall be protected during road improvements.As directed by a qualified biologist, the populations shall be fenced before construction with high-visibility fencing and an adequate buffer so that direct and indirect impacts would be minimized. Construction personnel shall be instructed to keep project activities out of the fenced areas. A qualified botanist shall periodically inspect the fencing to ensure that the fence is intact and the impacts to the populations are being avoided. Indirect impacts(i.e.,changes in hydrology)shall be minimized by placing culverts away from any plant populations,if necessary. MROSD shall utilize a qualified botanist to conduct protocol-level MROSD Before Construction preconstruction special-status plant surveys for all potentially occurring species within the project footprint that has not previously been surveyed(e.g.,trail connections,staging area expansion). Prior to ground-disturbance in potentially suitable habitat,surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate blooming period when they are most readily identifiable in accordance with Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities(DFG 2009). If no special-status plants are found during focused surveys,the botanist shall document the findings in a letter report,and no further mitigation shall be required. If special-status plant populations are found in the project footprint,MROSD MROSD Before Construction shall determine if the population can be avoided by adjusting the trail alignment or project design. If the impact cannot be avoided,MROSD shall consult with DFG and USFWS,as appropriate depending on species status,to determine the appropriate measures to minimize direct and indirect impacts on any special- status plant population that could occur as a result of project implementation. Mitigation measures may include preserving and enhancing existing populations,creation of off-site populations on project mitigation sites through seed collection or transplantation,and/or restoring or creating suitable habitat in sufficient quantities to achieve no net loss of occupied habitat or individuals. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation MonitoringAgency Implementabon Measure No. Measure Descripbon Schedule Compliance'• co 4.3-2(b) Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Special-Status Amphibians and Reptiles MROSD During Construction Although the impact to special-status amphibians or reptiles is expected to be minimal due to a lack of suitable aquatic habitat along ridgelines and headwaters of creeks,MROSD shall implement the following measures to reduce impacts during construction of trail connections: ) Construction of the trail across drainages and streams shall occur when the drainages are dry,unless it is not feasible to do so,in which case the following measures shall also be applied. ) Guidelines shall be implemented to protect water quality and prevent erosion,as outlined in MROSD's Road and Trail Typical Design Specifications(MROSD 2008). ) If water is present during construction,disturbance to pools and slow runs with cobble-sized substrate shall be minimized. In particular,rocks shall not be collected from in-water environments from late March to early September to avoid disturbing frog egg masses,tadpoles,and turtle hatchlings. 4.3-2(c) Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Golden Eagle,White-tailed Kite,and Other MROSD During Construction Nesting Birds To minimize potential disturbance to nesting birds,project activities shall occur during the non-breeding season(September 16-February 14),unless it is not feasible to do so,in which case the following measures shall also be applied. During trail construction,road improvements,and other activities,removal of MROSD During Construction trees greater than 6 inches dbh shall be limited to the greatest degree possible. If construction activity is scheduled to occur during the nesting season MROSD Prior to Approval of (February 15 to September 15),MROSD shall utilize a qualified biologist to Grad ingjlmprovement conduct preconstruction surveys and to identify active nests on and within 500 Plans AND no fewer feet of the project site that could be affected by project construction.The than 14 days and no surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days more than 30 days prior before the beginning of construction in a particular area. If no nests are found, to construction Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 8 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Monitoring Mitigationi 1 ' j" f a.ii Measure Description Compliance Record Measure No. Schedule D. no further mitigation is required. If active nests are found,impacts on nesting raptors and songbirds shall be MROSD Prior to and During avoided by establishment of appropriate buffers around the nests.No project Construction activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that any young have fledged or the nest is no longer active.A 500-foot buffer around raptor nests and 50-foot buffer around songbird nests are generally adequate to protect them from disturbance,but the size of the buffer may be adjusted by a qualified biologist in consultation with DFG depending on site specific conditions. For trail construction,use of non-power hand-tools may be permitted within the buffer area if the behavior of the nesting birds would not be altered as a result of the construction.Monitoring of the nest by a qualified biologist during and after construction activities will be required if the activity has potential to adversely affect the nest. 4.3-3 Mitigation Measure 4.3-3 Avoid and Minimize Impacts to Sensitive Natural MROSD Before Construction Communities and Compensate for loss of Riparian and Wetland Habitats. As a first priority,MROSD will seek to avoid wetlands impacts through trail realignment,bridging,and other avoidance measures. Before any groundbreaking activity along the trail connections,MROSD shall have a jurisdictional wetland delineation conducted by a qualified wetland specialist in sensitive areas that cannot be avoided. The preliminary delineation shall be submitted to USACE for verification.The wetlands may be subject to DFG regulation under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code.No grading,fill, or other ground disturbing activities shall occur until all required permits, regulatory approvals,and permit conditions for effects on wetland habitats are secured. If the wetlands are determined to be subject to USACE jurisdiction,the project MROSD Before Construction may qualify for use of Nationwide Permit 42 for construction of recreational trails if certain criteria are met.For those wetlands that cannot be avoided, MROSD shall commit to replace,restore,or enhance on a"no net loss"basis(in accordance with USACE,RWQCB,and DFG)the acreage of all wetlands and other waters of the U.S.that would be removed,lost,and/or degraded with project implementation.Wetland habitat shall be restored,enhanced,and/or Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation MonitoringAgency Implementation Monitoring ComplianceMeasure Description Measure No. Schedule ). replaced at an acreage and location and by methods agreeable to USACE, RWQCB,and DFG,as appropriate,depending on agency jurisdiction,and as determined during the permitting processes. 4.3-4 MROSD will take the following actions to educate hang glider pilots and other MROSD During Operation visitors regarding the potential to disturb birds,especially nesting raptors and vultures,and establish an incident reporting program: Hang glider permits will include a brochure prepared by a qualified ornithologist that describes agitated and defensive behavior of wildlife, focusing mostly on soaring birds,such as raptors and vultures.The permit will include a map that identifies protected air space that restricts hang gliding within a minimum of 1,000 feet of a known nest. Hang glider permits will include an agreement,to be signed by the pilot,that the pilot shall: — Respect local wildlife by maintaining appropriate distance and altitude(as safety permits)to minimize disturbance. — Watch for active/occupied raptor or vulture nests and communal roosts,and,if spotted,keep at least 1,000 feet clear. — Avoid approaching soaring birds.(Note that if a bird peacefully approaches a hang glider,this is not considered a disturbance.) — Report to MROSD any bird observed behaving aggressively or agitated as a result of the pilot's glider or any other glider. — Immediately leave the area(as safety permits)after a bird has exhibited aggressive or acutely agitated behavior. MROSD will post signs at hang glider observation locations describing aggressive or acutely agitated bird behavior,and encourage preserve users to report any of these observations to the provided telephone Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 10 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan IVIttigation MonbringAgency Implementation Measure No. Measure Description Schedule iRecord number. MROSD will implement an adaptive management plan,prepared by a qualified ornithologist,to monitor and mitigate observed agitation or potential disturbance to birds.The adaptive management plan will include(at a minimum)the following measures: MROSD staff will immediately investigate and document any legitimate reported incident of bird aggression or acute agitation in response to presence of a hang glider. MROSD staff will review these bird incident records continuously.If incidents in a specific area exceed three per month,MROSD will either reduce the number of hang gliding permits issued to 5 at one time with no more than 2 hang gliders per launch site or restrict the use of the affected area as a condition of the special use permit.(Note that if the excess number of incidents occurs only during the raptor nesting season,then the permit reduction may be limited only to March through August and may resume to normal permitting levels after the nesting season.) If repeated incidents occur with a specific hang glider or group,MROSD may revoke hang gliding privileges to those individuals. If,after reducing the number of permits or restricting the use of specific areas where the incidents have occurred,the bird incidents are not reduced below three per month,MROSD will consider discontinuance of the issuance of hang gliding permits at the project site. 4.4-1 a. Prior to earthmoving activities(e.g.,grading,excavation,construction), MROSD Prior to Earthmoving MROSD will consult with Santa Clara County Department of Public Works for Activities Municipal Regional Permit review and will also consult with the San Francisco Bay Basin Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB)to acquire the appropriate regulatory approvals that may be required to obtain Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan MitigaMonitoring ii / i • ' .If 'D' 1 Compliance Re cod Measure iSchedule i. Section 401 water quality certification,State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) stormwater permit for general construction activities,and any other necessary site-specific waste discharge requirements. No grading or other soil disturbance will occur until the appropriate regulatory approvals and permits have been issued. b. Prior to any earthmoving activities,as required under the NPDES stormwater MROSD Prior to Earthmoving permit for general construction activity,MROSD will prepare and submit the Activities appropriate Notice of Intent and prepare the SWPPP and other necessary engineering plans and specifications for pollution prevention and control. The SWPPP will identify and specify the use of erosion sediment control BMPs,means of waste disposal,nonstormwater management controls, permanent post-construction BMPs,and inspection and maintenance responsibilities. The SWPPP will also specify the pollutants that are likely to be used during construction and that could be present in stormwater drainage and nonstormwater discharges. c. Construction techniques will be identified that would reduce the potential MROSD Prior to and During runoff,and the SWPPP will identify the erosion and sedimentation control Construction measure to be implemented.BMPs designed to reduce erosion of exposed soil may include,but are not limited to: ) Use temporary mulching,seeding,or other suitable stabilization measures to protect uncovered soils; ) Store materials and equipment to ensure that spills or leaks cannot enter the storm drain system or surface water; ) Water exposed areas for dust control; ) Minimize off-site sediment transport on vehicles using techniques such as gravel driving surfaces to knock soil off tires at exit points;and ) Use barriers,such as perimeter silt fencing,to minimize the amount of uncontrolled runoff that could enter drains or surface waters. d. The SWPPP will also specify spill prevention and contingency measures, MROSD Prior to and During identify types of materials used for equipment operation,and identify Construction measures to prevent or clean up spills of hazardous materials used for Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 12 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation MonfloringAgency Implementation Measure No, Measure Description Schedule rRecord i equipment operation.Emergency procedures for responding to spills will also be identified.The SWPPP will identify personnel training requirements and procedures that would be used to ensure that workers are aware of permit requirements and proper installation and performance inspection methods for BMPs specified in the SWPPP.The SWPPP will also identify the appropriate personnel responsible for supervisory duties related to implementation of the SWPPP. All construction contractors will be required to retain a copy of the approved SWPPP on the construction site. 4.4-3 MROSD will implement appropriate design measures to adequately trap and MROSD During Construction treat discharged pollutants in designated parking areas. These design measures could include,but are not limited to structural and non-structural BMPs including installation of oil and grit separators to capture potential contaminates that are discharged in parking areas,establishment of vegetation in drainages to achieve optimal balance of conveyance and water quality protection;and installation of vegetation filter strips. 4.5-1 (Radar Tower Option 1 Only) MROSD Prior to Completion of Prior to completion of the proposed landform and environmental restoration, EnvironLandformmental and MROSD will utilize a qualified geotechnical engineer to conduct monitoring of Environmental the north and south slopes. If the qualified geotechnical engineer indicates that Restoration slope instability is jeopardizing the radar tower,then the MROSD will implement recommendations made by the geotechnical engineer including drainage rehabilitation and slope reinforcement(i.e.retaining walls). Implementation of these recommendations will ensure that slope subsidence does not occur that would affect the structural integrity of the tower. If the proposed landform and environmental restoration is completed prior to any actions recommended by the monitoring geotechnical engineer,MROSD will utilize a qualified geotechnical engineer to conduct a topographical survey based on the new contours.If the geotechnical engineer determines that additional slope stabilization measures are necessary(i.e.retaining wall)to ensure no risk of structural collapse,MROSD will implement these measures. As part of the proposed project,construction safety fencing will be erected, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation MonitoringAgency Implementation Monitoring Measure No. Measure Description Schedule r r r r prior to structural stabilization of the tower,at a distance equal to the height of the structure(in this case,a distance of 80 feet from the base of the tower)in order to allow public access to the area. Prior to implementation of the approved radar tower option and removal of the chain link fence from around the radar tower,MROSD will install permanent fencing along edges of the steep slopes in the vicinity of the radar tower.The permanent fencing will include materials consistent with a natural open space setting typical of fencing used in other MROSD preserves and open space facilities. (Radar Tower Option 2 and 3 Only) MROSD Prior to Implementation Prior to implementation of the approved radar tower option and removal of the of the Approved Radar chain link fence from around the radar tower,MROSD will install permanent Tower Option and fencing along edges of the steep slopes in the vicinity of the radar tower.The removal of the chain link fencing will include materials consistent with a natural open space setting fence typical of fencing used in other MROSD preserves and open space facilities. 4.6-1 Following demolition of structures,but prior to any grading activity or public MROSD Following demolition access within the former Almaden Air Force Station,MROSD will hire a qualified and prior to any grading hazardous materials specialist to prepare a focused pesticide soil testing and and public access remediation program.The soil testing program will be prepared according to the recommendations in Northgate's Sampling and Analysis Report. Based on the focused soil testing program,the perimeters and depths of soils containing contamination above residential ESI_s shall be specifically defined.Once these areas are defined,construction barriers or fencing shall be placed around the areas prior to initiating construction within other areas of the project site.No construction or public access may occur within the demarcated areas of contamination until the following remediation occurs:The qualified hazardous materials specialist will prepare a remediation plan for excavation and disposal of contaminated soils.The goal of the remediation plan will be to remove all soils containing chemical concentrations in excess of California human health screening levels and render excavated soil suitable for disposal at an appropriate landfill,unless the soils can be suitably treated on site,to below screening levels,in which case the soils can be disposed onsite.Soil removal Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 14 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Monitoring Mitigationr rImplementation Measure! r r r r r r Measure rSchedule activity will be completed in accordance with state and local regulatory requirements that provide specific targets for protection of human health. 4.6-5 MROSD will implement the following fire hazard minimization measures MROSD Before Construction (Voluntary) recommended by Wildland Resource Management: Construction-Related Fire Risk Reduction Prior to initiation of construction(including activities associated with mitigation measures,such as vegetation clearing),MROSD's contractor will prepare a fire prevention plan.This fire prevention plan will include such measures as a list of tools to have on hand,proof of spark arrestors on all gas-powered engines,a description of available communications,specifications for the supply of water to have on hand,and descriptions of other actions that will reduce the risk of ignition and immediate control of an incipient fire.This requirement should be included in the contract with the District. To minimize the risk of wildfire ignition,all motorized vehicles,including earth- MROSD Before and During moving equipment,used during this project will be equipped with spark Construction arresters,per California Public Resources Code 4442,and Health and Safety Code 13001 and 13005. Other motorized vehicles used on the project site will not be parked where vegetation may come in contact with exhaust systems and catalytic converters. Fuel Management and Fire-safe Restoration Design MROSD Before Construction and During Operation Prior to initiating construction of the restoration areas,MROSD will prepare a site-specific fuel management plan for the these areas as part of the specific site planning and design that dictates which species of trees/shrubs should be removed or pruned,and which plants should be planted or maintained(i.e., conifers may be replaced with hardwoods to reduce the chance of torching and ember production and distribution).The plan will include measures above and beyond MROSD's standard fuel management plan,such as a strategically located visitor safety zone,which includes fuel conditions appropriate for a safety zone (i.e.,large paved or graveled area such as a parking lot).This area will need to be Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 15 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan MonitoringMitigatiJr { { { • l ♦r{ Measure Description Compliance Measure No. Schedule W) inspected at least annually for compliance.The site-specific fuel management plan will apply to the former AFS housing area,and the summit areas,where the environmental restoration is proposed. The fuel management plan will also identify indigenous plant materials and/or seed mixes at staging areas or along trails.Indigenous plants are ideal due to their low maintenance and drought and fire resistant characteristics. The vegetation palette for the proposed restoration will identify native species that are shrubby or non-curing herbaceous cover(as opposed to grassy species), with little ignition potential.Plantings will be irrigated at least twice during the summer season to keep the moisture of the vegetation foliage high(keeping the dead material wet is not effective);if plantings cannot be irrigated twice a year, fuel volume will be reduced to meet the equivalent results in fire hazard.The spacing and design of the vegetation is more critical than the species planted. The restoration design will place plant species such that appropriate horizontal spacing occurs between masses of shrubs and specimen trees and appropriate vertical spacing will occur between tree branches,shrubs,and ground cover.This will discourage the creation of"fuel ladders"—a continuous fuel path by which a fire can climb from the ground to a shrub,to a tree,and ultimately produce and distribute embers than can start new fires far away. The restoration design will identify a palette of appropriate native plant species that have a low fuel volume and high foliar moisture and do not have a tendency to produce and"hold"dead wood and which also have a proper growth form. Factors that must be considered in rating the fire performance of plants include: Total volume. The greater the volume of plant material(potential fuel) present,the greater the fire hazard. Moisture content. The moisture content of plants is an important consideration;high levels of plant moisture can both lower fire risk and act as a heat sink if a fire occurs,reducing its intensity and spread. Amount and distribution of dead material. The amount of dead material in a given plant influences the total amount of water in the overall plant;the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 16 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigabon A. r� DescriptionMeasure No. Measure Schedule w Record dead material is usually much drier than living tissue. Whereas dead material rarely has a moisture content higher than 25%,live foliage moisture content ranges from 60 to 80%for chaparral species in xeric conditions to a high of 200 to 400%for succulent plants or plants under irrigation. Size of leaves,twigs,and branches. Materials with large surface areas(such as needles,twigs,or large flat leaves)dry more rapidly under fire conditions than materials with lower surface ratios(such as branches and fleshy leaves). Geometry and arrangement of the plant(overall spatial distribution of the biomass). The shape of a plant and the way in which the biomass is distributed throughout the plant is important because this bulk density affects the air flow and heat transfer through the plant. The arrangement of material within the plant affects its fuel continuity and its tendency to undergo preheating and promote fire spread. Examples of plants that may be appropriate include(but are not limited to)the following:coffeeberry,madrone,coast live oak,bay,ceanothus,and toyon. Examples of species to remove include coyote brush,black sage,and sagebrush. The fuel management plan will include a maintenance component.The maintenance program will require annual removal of dead material and maintenance of the vertical and horizontal spaces that create a fire-safe design. Maintenance requirements are incorporated in the District guidelines. 4.7-1 7MRSD and all construction contractors shall implement the following basic MROSD During Construction all during construction,per BAAQMD's Air Quality Guidelines: All un-compacted exposed surfaces(e.g.,parking areas,staging areas,soil piles,graded areas,and unpaved access roads)shall either be watered two times per day when average winds exceed 20 miles per hour(mph)or covered with a dust palliative(e.g., mulch,straw). If watered,watering shall be done at a frequency adequate to maintain minimum soil moisture of 12%.Moisture content can be verified by lab samples or moisture probe. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan r a. ImplMeasure No. Measure eSchedule mentation r rr ) All haul trucks transporting soil,sand,demolished building materials,or other loose material off-site shall be covered. ) Erosion control seed mix shall be planted in disturbed areas where appropriate as soon as possible and watered as needed for up to three years. ) During windy days,the simultaneous occurrence of excavation,grading, and ground-disturbing construction activities on the same area at any one time shall be limited.Activities shall be phased to reduce the amount of disturbed surfaces at any one time. ) All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. ) All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. ) All roadways,driveways,and sidewalks that are planned as part of the project to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible.Any building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. ) Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes(as required by the California airborne toxics control measures(ATCM)Title 13,Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations[CCR)).Clear signage about this requirement shall be provided for construction workers and truck drivers at all access points. ) All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer's specifications.All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints.This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.BAAQMD's phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. Midpeninsula Regional open Space District 18 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Mitigation Monitoring Plan MoniWng Mitigation Measure DescriptionMonitoringAgency Implementation Compliance ScheduleMeasure No. r 4.7-5 Utilizing a qualified geologist,project-related construction and grading would MROSD Prior to and during be sited to avoid ultramafic rock to the maximum extent feasible.If Demolition construction or grading in ultramafic substrates would be unavoidable,MROSD shall conduct an investigation to determine whether and where NOA is present. The site investigation shall include the collection of soil and rock samples by a qualified geologist.If the site investigation determines that NOA is present on the project site then MROSD shall comply with the requirements of BAAQMD's naturally occurring asbestos program by submitting an Asbestos Dust Mitigation Application and any other applicable notification forms to BAAQMD pursuant to BAAQMD's Air Toxic Control Measure(ATCM)Inspection Guidelines Policies and Procedures.Completion of the Asbestos Dust Mitigation Application largely consists of the development of an asbestos dust control plan,which specifies measures for preventing or minimizing the generation of NOA-containing dust associated with track-out onto paved public roads,active storage piles,inactive disturbed surfaces and storage piles,traffic on un-paved surfaces and roads, earthmoving activities,off-site transport of materials,and stabilization of disturbed soil surfaces post construction.In order to fulfill the requirements of Section 93105 of the California Health and Safety Code,"Asbestos Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Construction,Grading,Quarrying,and Surface Mining Operations,"the asbestos dust control plan shall specify measures,such as periodic watering to reduce airborne dust and ceasing construction during high winds,that shall be taken to ensure that no visible dust crosses the property line.Measures in the Asbestos Dust Control Plan may include but shall not be limited to dust control measures required by Mitigation Measure 4.7-1.MROSD shall submit the plan to BAAQMD for review and approval before construction. Upon approval of the asbestos dust control plan by BAAQMD,the MROSD shall ensure that construction contractors implement the terms of the plan throughout the construction period. • 4.10-1 MROSD shall implement the following mitigation measures to improve roadway MROSD Before,During,and condition/operation during and after construction.These measures would be After Construction required with or without removal of the radar tower. Improve and repave Mt. Umunhum Road to increase vehicle accessibility Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project 19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan Ascent Environmental Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mitigation ► . ... Measure Description Compliancer MeasureNo. Schedule (Name/Date) after completion of demolition. In the interim,provide necessary temporary improvements(e.g.pothole repairs). Survey the demolition and construction truck route between Mt. Umunhum Road and Almaden Expressway(or Camden Avenue)before project initiation and after all work is completed.Provide repair as required to all road segments with documented pavement degradation due to project trucks. Post signs along the narrower two-lane sections of construction haul routes informing bike riders as well as local drivers of dates and times of potential truck traffic. Post signs of potential delay in advance of construction/excavation sites along Mt. Umunhum Road. Ensure communication links between truck drivers so they are aware when there will be uphill and downhill truck traffic at the same time on Mt. Umunhum Road and/or Hicks Road. Survey Mt.Umunhum Road on a weekly basis during all demolition off haul,excavated material haul and any fill importation to determine whether pavement condition remains adequate in all locations along Mt. Umunhum Road for safe truck traffic activity.If not,provide interim pavement repairs as needed. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 20 Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project I ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 12-XX MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MOUNT UMUNHUM ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT WHEREAS,the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District(MROSD or the District) acquired the former Almaden AFS and all remaining facilities at the site in 1980; and WHEREAS, the primary goal for the overall Mount Umunhurn Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project is to establish a fiscally and environmentally sustainable visitor destination that aligns with the District's mission by balancing public access, enjoyment, and education with environmental restoration; and WHEREAS the overall project includes several elements, including 3 options for a radar tower(which encompass two interim near-term actions), trails, and demolition of existing buildings on the site but not necessarily including demolition of the radar tower; and WHEREAS, the District certified that an EIR was prepared for the proposed project, including all elements, and that the EIR was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared to address implementation of all project components; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted multiple planning meetings, as well as a number of hearings related to the project and the CEQA process; and ATTACHMENT 3 WHEREAS, substantial public interest has been expressed in one component of the project, the options for addressing the radar tower; and WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed all project materials including the EIR and its appendices, staff reports, and attachments; and WHEREAS, the Board previously approved the demolition of all buildings on the project site except the radar tower, approved implementation of all proposed improvements except those located on the summit, removed the backpack camp from the proposal, and certified the EIR. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors that implementation of the overall project, including development of summit improvements and partially removing the tower but leaving a publically accessible foundation(Radar Tower Option 2), is approved. ATTCHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 12-XX MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MOUNT UMUNHUM ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT WHEREAS, the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District(MROSD or the District) acquired the former Almaden AFS and all remaining facilities at the site in 1980; and WHEREAS, the primary goal for the overall Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project is to establish a fiscally and environmentally sustainable visitor destination that aligns with the District's mission by balancing public access, enjoyment, and education with environmental restoration; and WHEREAS the overall project includes several elements, including 3 options for a radar tower(which encompass two interim near-term actions), trails, and demolition of existing buildings on the site but not necessarily including demolition of the radar tower; and WHEREAS, the District certified that an EIR was prepared for the proposed project, including all elements, and that the EIR was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared to address implementation of all project components; and WHEREAS, the Board has conducted multiple planning meetings, as well as a number of hearings related to the project and the CEQA process; and ATTCHMENT 3 WHEREAS, substantial public interest has been expressed in one component of the project, the options for addressing the radar tower; and WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed all project materials including the EIR and its appendices, staff reports, and attachments; and WHEREAS, the Board previously approved the demolition of all buildings on the project site except the radar tower, approved implementation of all proposed improvements except those located on the summit,removed the backpack camp from the proposal, and certified the EIR. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors that implementation of the overall project, including development of summit improvements and demolition of the radar tower and environmentally restoring the footprint(Radar Tower Option 3), is approved. ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 12-XX MI DPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DIS TRICT STRICT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MOUNT UMUNHUM ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT WHEREAS , the Mid peninsula Regional Open Space District ct(MROSD or the District) acquired the former Almaden AFS and all remaining facilities at the site in 1980; and WHEREAS, the primary goal for the overall Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project is to establish a fiscally and environmentally sustainable visitor destination that aligns with the District's mission by balancing public access, enjoyment, and education with environmental restoration; and WHEREAS the overall project includes several elements, including 3 options for a radar tower(which encompass two interim near-term actions), trails, and demolition of existing buildings on the site but not necessarily including demolition of the radar tower; and WHEREAS, the District certified that an EIR was prepared for the proposed project, including all elements, and that the EIR was completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared to address implementation of all project components; and WHEREAS theBoard oard has conducted multiple tannin meetings, well number f s as a as ao P planning g � hearings related to the project and the CEQA process; and WHEREAS, H REAS substantial public interest has been expressed in one component of the project, the options for addressing the radar tower; and WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed all project materials including the EIR and its appendices, staff reports, and attachments; and WHEREAS, the Board previously approved the demolition of all buildings on the project site except the radar tower, approved implementation of all proposed improvements except those located on the summit, removed the backpack camp from the proposal, and certified the EIR. BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors that implementation of the overall project, including development of summit improvements and retaining and sealing the radar tower (Radar Tower Option 1), is approved. s �aor •' Mt. El Sombroso 2999 ft. rw : • our ? ✓ r i E No Public Access ,.. Mt.Thayer Demolition and Patrol 97 3483 ft. Access Only Mt. Umun Rj;+aa E "Ba(YMoun w 3486 t * 2387 ft. No Public Access w West of This Point ♦ # 1.4ail_5__�' Potential Staging Location • <i Currently r ��`-�,•_��'� G� closed to public vior Ralph's beyond this point. 4'Mountain r., .. 2716 ft dt: 2 L k r ATTACHMENT 4 Midpeninsula Regional Project Area Existing Conditions Open Space District Project Site -- Mt. Umunhum Road MRCSD Preserves ® MROSD Gate Private Road 8 April 2011 ® Potential _ _ _ Proposed Trail -_---ice Miles a Staging Area Connection Private Property O Private Property Gate Existing Trail p 0.5 While the District strives to use the best available digital data,this data does not represent a legal survey and is merely a graphic illustration of geographic features. ATTACHMENT 5 MOUNT ••NMENTAL RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PLAN Aidponinsula Regional Open Space District Concept ' I ' Elements Approved September 19,2012 Restored Summit Radar Tower Elements Proposed for Approval Environmental Restoration! !(Three Options+ October 17,2012 ADA-accessible Paths! Two interim Actions; Ceremonial Space/Seating ADA:um S... Ve rcie Accessrhla Ramp ADAacoa-ble Parkaq mrf \ uinm�t AOA- \ Lov:e J12.ry,.�ni _itd+'v.a, aci:eselGle f \PaMmg\ Palm Private Property Beyond This Point. \ \\\ / ��ergenc 7" Puohc Acraaa to Mount Thayer. \ ;Toilet 1� /� Verde \ 9u Lexington Basin and Woods Trod 0 / Turnarountl v \\ Not vn Secured ^I ( / Z. /r m _ Landing Zone Tads 1�` ��� Mncfung Pool stir `�\� 1 Picnic i Temporary/, 1Augr-` /Pi ,c \ ) Was.Tank S3 �✓ use Tr n Hnchmg you 1 recces peN,ng N �_ /�.--�s1�' 7ao�s -� Summit Court and Drop-off �P ��`(� I /� `� \ Seating/Bicycle RackIPotential � Pu c Toiet\� —� Interpretive Center t ad•' \\ Viewpoint 1 \� \ Ceremonial Space Mulls—Trmlto Bald Mountatn •� �� Parking Area Former Housing Area 1 Environmental Restoration/Picnic n / Tables/Non-potable Water I / Dedicated 911 Call Box l / To Baid Mo.nta- •..w x ., Parking Area Mount Umunhum 3.466 — ..♦ E..l n+e niter, - EmxYxc K.w i...a-.a a.i. a_arui aUNoccpamM Upper Pu.irq NllNur Tell MuryMM Trau Lov F•vp aa w lai er�wr. r.b.il ENWpanx REGIONALMIDPENINSULA OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve Project Summary ATTACHMENT 6 ENVIRONMENTAL . • Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District is poised to provide public access to the former Almaden Air Force Station and its spectacular panoramic vistas, located atop Mount Umunhum and nearby Mount Thayer. Situated about 13 mites south of San Jose and three miles southeast of Los Gatos, Mount Umunhum is one of the highest peaks in the Santa Cruz Mountains and forms the scenic backdrop to the Santa Clara Valley, see Figure I (Regional Location). The project site was previously owned and operated by the federal government as the Almaden Air Force Station (AFS) until it was decommissioned in 1980. MROSD purchased the site in 1986 and now manages it as part of the 18,000-acre Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers abated hazardous materials from the site in 2011 and demolition of all but one structure is scheduled to be complete by spring or summer 2013. The one structure still under consideration is an 80-foot-tall concrete base for a Cold War-era radar dish, visible from the ...w Santa Clara Valley and points beyond. The Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project (Project) is the result of an extensive and ongoing public planning process, guided by the Sierra Azul/Bear Creek Redwoods Ad Hoc Committee. The purpose of the Project is to provide public access opportunities for the former Almaden AFS located atop the Sierra Azul Open Space Preserve summits of Mount Umunhum and Mount Thayer, and to engage in public outreach and perform the environmental review process pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) necessary to develop the Project. With final Project approval by the Board of Directors in October 2012, this Project Summary contains a description of all the Project elements and phased implementation approach that will enable visitors to reach the summit of Mount Umunhum, which has been closed to the public for 26 years due to the presence of hazardous materials on the former Almaden AFS. The goat of the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project is to establish a fiscally and environmentally sustainable visitor destination that aligns with the District's mission by balancing public access, enjoyment, and education with environmental restoration. This goal will be achieved through the following objectives: Create a destination that is accessible to and accommodates a broad range of user groups and introduces new visitors to open space. ■ Remove or permanently cap physical hazards and restore the native landscape and habitat for wildlife as much as possible. ■ Provide minimalist visitor amenities that complement and highlight the world-class views and open space experience. ■ Provide ample, rich, and diverse trail experiences for hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians. ■ Highlight the rich natural and cultural history of the site through self-discovery and focused interpretive and educational opportunities. The Project will create an accessible and accommodating destination, removing hazards and restoring the native landscape, providing minimalist amenities and ample trails, and highlighting the natural and cultural history of the site. Environmental restoration actions to re-establish natural topography and vegetation at the former Almaden AFS are a key component of opening the site to public use. Mount Umunhum Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 1 MIDPENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT AERIAL VIEW Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District OPEN • SPACE F I B tl C I S L J -�•�Y , y.� _ OSO 5 3 i •�_. .. �. :' . i y 13 'r �f ;p s. �Naara � Cl lillAl 9 t _ T F! {I Neq Pa s yY nn I V•' vo f s i 'r O c e a n � r7 dF I • • I • ENVIRONMENTAL . • Project Elements Individual elements of the Project, shown conceptually in Figure 2 (Conceptual Site Plan), are divided by subject and briefly described below. Note that while the full range of the opportunities for public enjoyment at Mount Umunhum are described, implementation of individual components may be phased as funding, property ownership, access easements, and other constraints allow. Public Access Providing access to people of all abilities to the summit of Mount Umunhum is a primary goal of the Project. Access to the summit via a new, multi-use trail from the Bald Mountain trailhead will be provided in the first phases of the Project. A new 30- to 40 stall parking lot will be constructed at this trailhead. As funding allows, up to two paved-surfaced and one gravel-surfaced parking lots will be constructed in the summit area. Adjacent to the peak, a summit court will provide a paved passenger and emergency vehicle turnaround and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-accessible parking. Vehicular Access The project site is accessed by Mt. Umunhum Road, portions of which are held in private ownership. The last two miles of the road are currently closed to the public. Public access rights to these sections must be acquired prior to allowing public vehicular use of the road. If approved by the Board and following resolution of this issue, public vehicular access will be phased in over time. In the early phases, a permit system will allow a limited number of vehicles to access the summit. Full driving access will be provided once funding is secured to implement necessary repairs and Native plant communities, including chaparral and mixed evergreen forest, safety upgrades to Mt. Umunhum Road. will be restored on site �,.. ,. Trails Hikers, bikers, and equestrians will access the summit via a 1.7-mile multi-use connector trail originating at the new Bald Mountain staging area (Barlow Road trailhead). A short hiking-only loop trail at the summit will provide access to site amenities, viewpoints, and interpretive features. In later phases, a second connector trail from the west will link Ralph's Mountain and the Lexington Basin to Mount Thayer. Dogs will not be permitted on the new trails or at the Mount Umunhum summit. Future location of the Bald Mountain Staging Area Mount Umunhum I Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 3 I A �. O C • -• r-r• - e ` *, Radar Tower Restored Summit r.p 4 xk� c s Environmental Restoration/ .(Three Options,+ ADA-accessible Paths/ Two Interim Actions) r * ' * Ceremonial Space/Sealing n AOA—i ser VMkw Aacea ',M3 �P ADA-.tpf.ible su—t ACAS 1 C yr p\ snr ar t� -�\ Rrvala pmq,b lAyarxi TtJa Pahl PageA .bLtyu TNrar l i Benue \ _ \� Ee[.gonea.rwvroodrTnx \f, rhkr� t� ��/ Turn.r��M • \`•' 'l 1 V I r.'roaa7 r r kruro.,�' /Pkrv�\ Walar Tank j or«m �a4 T+"a —�� ` Summit Court an Oro ff __ y rr,� nn�aq Poa? I.TrOM. -- d " f Seating!Bicycle Rack l Potential -- �c,kc ` Interpretive Center Viewpoint I Ceremonial Space u trial BWR m W ROW Ln I �\ _Former Housing Area I Environmental Restoration/ , Picnic Tables!Non potable Water/ /i - / Dedicated 911 Call Box I� um Moaunr.�o...umnvwn. n8 Figure 2. Conceptual Site Plan ENVIRONMENTAL • • Visitor Amenities Two viewpoint/ceremonial spaces will provide a peaceful place for contemplation. Other potential amenities include benches, picnic tables, wind and shade protection, vault toilets, a dedicated emer- gency callbox, hitching posts, bicycle posts, and rywy� non potable water (for horses and fire protection) , contained in one or more onsite water tanks. A small -- visitor center may be phased in over time as funding • 'I and other constraints allow. Hang Gliding and Paragliding vU, , U. sw 1k V;mn W A hang gliding/paragliding launch site and landing P ' area will be provided as part of the Project, following the established Windy Hill Open Space ADA Accessible Trail Features Preserve model. The launch site will be located at the Mount Umunhum summit away from highly concentrated uses and wilt ideally allow launches to the east via a short, steep, clear runway. The final launch site will be determined during later design development. Landings will be permitted at Bald Mountain. Motorized aircraft will not be permitted. Interpretation The summit area of Mount Umunhum will emphasize the site's natural, Native American, and military cultural history through a range of interpretive features and elements, including an ADA-accessible interpretive trail. • 1 1 • � f Conceptual Interpretive Panels: Natural History, Military History, Native American Prehistory Public Access Phasing If allowed via special permission to use the road, special docent-led tours may bring participants to the summit • following demolition, provided that safety precautions are in place for the one potentially remaining building, the radar tower. Access to the summit by hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians may begin shortly after the new trail to the summit from Bald Mountain is completed. Mt. Umunhum Road is expected to function as the main access route to the summit in the long-term. Limited vehicular access by the public via special permit may begin shortly after resolv- ing public access rights for use of the road and implementing road safety upgrades. Full vehicle access and/or access via shuttle service may begin following more extensive roadwork, including a resurfacing of Mt. Umunhum Road. Note that public access between Mount Umunhum and Mount Thayer is not included in this Project. Mount Umunhum ! MidKninsula Regional Open Space District f5 i MIDPENINSULA REGIONALOPEN SPACE DISTRICT i s fi. View to the East From Bald Mountain, Sierra Azu( Open Space Preserve Operations Staffing, and Security i The Project is dependent on additional staffing to carry out the public access elements as described. Upon full build- out of the Project, two additional rangers and one maintenance field staff position are estimated to be necessary to meet patrol and maintenance needs for the site. One additional administrative staff position is also estimated to be necessary to carry an increased workload to manage docents, permitting, and volunteer activities, especially if a visitor center is established. The Project includes a dedicated emergency 911 callbox, and an emergency vehicle turnaround for large emergency equipment such as fire trucks. Mount Umunhum will be open during typical Preserve hours (sunrise to one-half hour after sunset). Visitor Use Estimates Preliminary use estimates have been developed for the Project that assume a long-term, fully-developed, vehicle- accessible site based on observed traffic levels at Mount Hamilton. Mount Hamilton is a local mountaintop which was determined to be most similar to Mount Umunhum in terms of visitor appeal, distance to an urban center, and level of facility development. Using this method, it is estimated that visitation will range from 35,000 to 40,000 visitors annually. However, because it is impossible to know with certainty what future visitor levels will be, it is the District's intention to utilize an adaptive staffing management strategy for the Project. Utilities Non-potable water for horses will either be purchased from nearby landowners or from a commercial source and stored on site in one or more water tanks. All restrooms will be vault toilets that require no water or sewage connections and will be regularly pumped by District staff or an outside septic service, as necessary. Solar electricity will be generated on site as needed. Small solar panels will be associated with each light, appliance, and/or structure (i.e., a small solar panel will be placed on top of the 911 call box post, and small solar panel arrays placed on a future visitor center). Propane gas, if needed, will be stored in small, residential-style, aboveground tanks. 6 1 Mount Umunhum 1 October 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL • • • Environmental Restoration Habitat restoration and landform restoration (re-creating original topography, including natural a drainage swales) will provide a foundation for re-vegetation using appropriate native plant species. —µ h r- _ a i The network of legacy roads and building pads from � _ !� the former Almaden (AFS) era were inherited by the District at the time of land purchase. Just as heavy H`vntise equipment was necessary to create the former ' !; Almaden AFS, it is necessary to use similar equipment to restore the area to a more natural condition. The District intends to return much of the area to its r lul q former topography by performing physical restoration of the stream channels, swales, and hills. This will allow rainfall to find its former pathways in channels Habitat Restoration with Native Vegetation that evolved over time to carry streamflow down the mountain. Some vegetation in the vicinity of the restoration work will be cleared and stockpiled. It will later be spread on the finished slope to provide microclimates for vegetation regeneration and to provide habitat for insects, birds, and small mammals. Multi-use trails are planned to be constructed in conjuction with environmental restoration efforts. Where feasible, species from the existing native plant i community will be selected to replant some of the finished slopes, especially those having low flammability where possible, •ria� 3 to accelerate the natural revegetation process. There will be construction scars, but they will be temporary. In a few years, - natural succession will enable vegetation to re-establish and blend with the surrounding vegetation so that in the long term, _ visitors will not recognize they are traveling along the path of a former paved road but will instead enjoy a scenic trail that blends seamlessly into the landscape. 1; Excavation of a drainage channel with heavy equip- ment by District crew as part of habitat restoration Project Implementation Implementation of the Mount Umunhum Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project will be phased as funding is made available. Phase I includes above-and below-ground demolition of structures at the former Almaden AFS, and is anticipated to occur over a period of three or four months beginning in November 2012 and concluding in April 2013. The total cost of the Cleanup Phase is anticipated to be $4.3 to $4.6 million. Mount Umunhum I Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 7 MIDPENINSULA REGIONALOPEN SPACE DISTRICT Capital costs for all phases of the Project total approximately$13.1 million (in 2011 dollars). The District will consider long-term operational and maintenance costs prior to initiating each Project element to ensure that adequate long-term resources can be committed. It is assumed that new funding sources, including grants and private donations, will be secured prior to implementation of all Mount Umunhum projects. Following demolition, Project implementation will be phased in general as follows (also see Figure 3 (Cost and Phasing Summary) on the following page). Phase 11, Trails and Staging 1. Approximately 30-40 vehicle parking area on Mount Umunhum Road near Bald Mountain 2. Multi-use trail from the parking area to the summit for hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians 3. Environmental restoration (re-establishing natural drainage features and native plants) 4. Minimal and preliminary site amenities at the summit, including vault toilet and trail; may include seating, shade, and summit loop trail Phase III, Radar Tower and Summit Area 1. Environmental restoration (other summit area improvements are discussed in the Unscheduled Phase of the Project and dependent on outside factors) Phase IV. Additional Project Development 1. Interpretive site amenities and programming 2. Multi-use trail throughout summit area 3. Further environmental restoration 4. Potential visitor center Unscheduled Phase - dependent on outside factors (e.g. funding, negotiations, etc) 1. Implementation of the Board-approved radar tower option 2. Limited, permit-only driving access to the summit, once ownership issues have been resolved on Mt. Umunhum Road, with the following considerations: Limited number of permits per day; Offered on select weekend and holidays between April and November; ■ Subject to weather; ■ Issued on a first-come, first-served basis. 3. Safety and road upgrades to Mount Umunhum Road once road access issues have been resolved; once completed and parking is made available at the summit, general public access by vehicle allowed and permit-only vehicle access discontinued. 4. ADA accessible trail construction at summit area (dependent on public vehicle access). w Mount Umunhum, Sierra Azu(Open Space Preserve 8 ( Mount Umunhum October 2012 •' • PROJECT • 'i Project Phasing Schedule and Funding Requirements • 2017 i 2019 - - — FOTAL PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 SCHEDULPROJECED CLEAN UP TRAILS and STAGING RADAR TOWER and SUMMIT AREA FULL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST TOTAL $4.3 4.6m TOTAL $1 .3m TOTAL $100k TOTAL $2.0 2.5m $8.1m -- - - - — _ PROJECT PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND PERMITTING Remediation of -" -"- �^ TOTAL hazardous materials $2.im UNSCHEDULED Demolition or Unscheduled Phase ($4.9 - 5.2m) PROJECT O existing structures $2.2-2.5m COST C Mt. Umunhum Road improvements $3.Om ' $5.1m Radar tower safety upgrade or partial demolition $817k- 1.1m C 3 IT-rail connections from Bald Mountain $200k Interim Actions for Radar Tower $75k-415k e Land Barlow Road to summit ._ Summit court,accessible traits at radar tower area $1.1m $9.9m lunsecuredl 7 S Minimal restoration,amenities $500k S3.2m ISecuredl LA C !and trails Construct new staging area $600k at Bald Mountain n NRestoration $t 00k 0 Interpretive features and C programming,multi-use trail, $2.0-2.5m t—y native vegetation restoration a• Interpretive i visitor center' 0) Ongoing Costs to District Shown Below Line 'not mduded in costs o - .__ -- ---- --- -- ------- —-- — --Y New administrative and field staff positions ($SUOk annual(y) rD ------ ---- -: .. Site maintenance (unknown) -- — Un - Road maintenance($60k annually,unknown start,potentially funded by parking fee) tA _v N 't 1 Figure 3. Cost and Phasing Summary �o 1 ATTACHMENT 7 -t r� .w�,..•�.. �Jai`-'�.+�._�.,3t t ��'_`�- lh yy v 1 • Restoration .- µ;Li-yam"�'" _ _--- -"�►l�a,..... Open Air 111441411 Retain and Seal 80-ft Radius from Tower Base Summit Visitor Area: Ecological Restoration, ADA Drop-off4. Trail Informal Seating . . '` ...�� Tow uBas'61 at ViewpointAl s ;I Ak 17 d di > •.. '\ ,. G� 49-V � . A� _ No Access Beyond his Point #` e Perm'Tt� a Parking g 'a Area00 r _•" K a fN. _ T rn I � y r i- s � Interim Action B: Near-term fence around structure while seeking external partnerships Midpeninsula Regional ATTACHMENT 8 Open space District (MROSD) October, 2012 , e Feet��_ 0 50 100 . boa e the District strives to use the best available digital data,this data does not represent a legal survey an is merely a graphic illustration of geographic features. ATTACHMENT 9 Evaluation of Each Radar Tower Option against the Board-Approved Factors to Consider for Existing Structure Open-air with Restoration Interim Action A:Near-term repair/ Interim Action B:Near-term fence/ Retain and Seal lowered walls seek partnerships seek partnerships Aligned with basic Although not deemed eligible for District Policy to Acknowledges the listing on the National or California historical merit of the May not align with provide low-intensity Historic Register,the tower can be policy to seek recreation;may not tower but does not considered a"structure of unique partnerships to fund be aligned with policy Board-adopted align with policy to seek historical merit"and/or an retention or to seek partnerships Same as short-term safety upgrade District Policies partnerships to fund rehabilitation of to fund retention or "improvement which contributes to retention or the character of the site"'For such rehabilitation'for such structures with unique rehabilitation of structures,policy indicates that the structures. historical merit. structures with District seek partnerships to fund unique historical retention or rehabilitation.' merit. Not aesthetically compatible with natural setting;tower Not aesthetically compatible with Compatibility obstructs some Reduced height natural setting;tower obstructs Not aesthetically compatible with sweeping views but lessens impact on some sweeping views but does not natural setting,and fence would with Open Space does not detract from aesthetics could be Most compatible with detract from tranquil experience or block access to summit area beyond Character of the tranquil experience or designed to blend in natural setting prevent public from traveling the tower and prevent public from Site prevent public from with natural setting around the structure to experience enjoying all available views traveling around the views tower to experience views High opportunities for Highest opportunities Moderate education and historic High opportunities for education Historic and for education and interpretation for opportunities for Highest opportunities for education and interpretation,however, historic interpretation education and and historic interpretation both on Educational visitors on the site via effectiveness of the tower as an both on and off the site historic and off the site via the tower itself Value via the tower itself and onsite exhibits and interpretation via and onsite exhibits interpretive feature is decreased as onsite exhibits remaining walls/ onsite exhibits viewed from on the site footprint 1Policies Regarding Improvements on District Lands,Section C,Discussion. 2 Basic Policies,Cultural Resources,Section E. Open-air with Restoration Interim Action A.Near-term repair/ Interim Action B:Near-term fence/ Retain and Seal lowered walls seek partnerships seek partnerships Potential Financial Cost, $1.1m/$1.gm including Incl.Liability and 4o-year maintenance $8i6�953 $b�4,3�9 $4�4,g55 $74,zoo Management3 Partnership High potential for Moderate potential for Limited potential for Highest potential;assumes a sunset Highest potential;assumes a sunset Opportunities friends group or other partnership partnershipdate for seekingpartnership date for seeking partnership PP / public/private p p p p g p p Cooperation partnership opportunities opportunities opportunities opportunities Interpretive feature, Interpretive feature, Proposed and Restored open space Interpretive feature,waypoint from Interpretive feature,waypoint from Potential Uses waypoint from valley public gathering/ area valley floor valley floor floor seating place Public Sentiment Most support Some support Some support Unknown Unknown and Input Retains symbol of the Retains modified re In the interim,retains symbol of the region's role in the Cold symbol of region's role Removes symbol of In the interim,retains symbol of the Regional g y g y region's role in the Cold region's role in the Cold War and War/military history and in Cold War; Cold War Era connection to military history/silicon Importance or connection to silicon connectionfo military removes built feature War/military silicon history and connection valley;however effectiveness may Value to silicon valley;visual point of valley;visual point of history and silicon on skyline reference be decreased;visual point of reference valley reference Consistency with Least alignment Less alignment Aligns Aligns if outside Aligns if outside Strategic Plan funding/partnerships are secured funding/partnerships are secured Tradeoffs and Low initially;long-term impacts Low initially;long-term impacts Impacts on District Potentially high Potentially moderate Low dependent on outside funding and dependent on outside funding and Resources partnerships partnerships Detracts from visitor Does not significantly Visitor experience of natural detract from visitor Adds to visitor Detracts from visitor experience of Detracts from visitor experience of Experience open space,but adds experience of open experience of open natural open space,but adds natural open space and detracts cultural interest space,and adds space cultural interest from cultural interest cultural interest 3 Conceptual Cost Estimate for Construction and 40 year Maintenance,Restoration Design Group,2012. MountENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PUBLIC ACCESS PROJECT Project Phasing ScheduleRequirements 2011 20121 114 2015 20161 118 2019 2020 - ( - T.TAL PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 SCHEDULED PROJECT CLEAN UP I TRAILS and STAGING I RADAR TOWER and SUMMIT AREA I FULL, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COST TOTAL $4.3 - 4.6m TOTAL $1 .3m TOTAL $100k TOTAL $2.0 - 2.5m I) $8.1m PROJECT PLANNING, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND PERMITTING eme ration o TOTAL hazardous materials $2.1m "'^'•�• � UNSCHEDULED Demolition of $2.2- 2.5m Unscheduled Phase ($4.9 - 5.2m) PROJECT existing structures Mt. Umunhum Road improvements $3.Om COST Radar tower safety upgrade or partial dernolition $g17k- 1.1m $5. m [and rail connections from Bald Mountain $200k' Interim Actions for Radar Tower $75k-415k Bartow Road to summit Summit court, accessible traits at radar tower area $1.1m $9.9m (unsel tired) _ _- _ T.. Minimal restoration, amenities $500k $3.2m (secured) and trails - Construct new staging area $600k at Bald Mountain Restoration $100k Interpretive features and programming, multiuse trail, $2.0- 2.5m native vegetation restoration L ----- - Interpretive / visitor center' Ongoing Costs to District Shown Below Line not Inctuded In costs AMIIM1 T10 New administrative and field staff positions ($500k annually) Site maintenance (unknown) Road maintenance (S60k annually, unknown start, potentially funded by parking fee) — 7 ., Attachnnemtiv Mount Ummwnhmnm Environmental Restoration and Public Access Project ! Public comments received September 20 throughOctobero1,2m12 | i. | Sant Thursday, Seotenlberz4 2012 10:43 PM To:Web; Curt Riffle First Name:Sam Last Name: Drake Ward /Lmcotimn:San Jose Curt, | always appreciate your professionalism in chairing the public meetings re K8t' Umunhum. Thank you for your patience. Here is my suggestion for a win/win solution that gets the Board out of the box it finds itself in. |think itis the best path forward; please give it your consideration. The Fate mf Mount Umnmmhummby After decades of waiting and years of planning,the future of Mt. Umunhum and its iconic i Cube is about tobe determined.The Mid-Peninsula Regional [)pen Space District/K4RQ�D�, i / the nmwuntaintmp, ` ' scurrentovvner, has completed the planning process.They have solicited public feedback, analyzed various options,and determined their costs.At their October meeting the MROSD Board is scheduled to decide the fate of the Cube atop Mt. Umunhum. Should it be torn down or left standing?Three options are up for consideration: 1' Demolish the Cube and return the site toa natural state 2. Demolish most of the Cube, leaving some walls from the first floor to represent where the Cube once was, or 3. Seal the Cube and leave it in place. | think it is in MRC)SD's best interests-and those of Santa Clara Countyresidents-forthe Board to choose afourth alternative. Public feedback asexpressed at M8RC)SD'spub|ic meetings is wildly in favor of preserving the Cube. Many ofus believe the Cube is important historically, as a legacy of the Cold War, and should be preserved on that basis. Others believe the Cube adds significantly tothe South Bay landscape. In South San Jose we are lucky to have two"castles in the air'|ookingoutfmrus-the Cube on K8t' Ummunhurn and the Observatory on K4t' Hamilton. For those of us in San Jose who live our lives under their gaze, for either to disappear would be a huge loss.Yet the MROSD is reluctant to keep the Cube. While Knt' Unnunhurn is owned by their District' it is distant outpost.The District stretches from Los Gatos to Pacifica. Most members of their Board don't live under the gaze ofthe Cube, and don't'^gat'' it's importance.Worse, since San Jose isn't part of the District,the people that would be most impacted by the loss of the Cube have no voice in the decision. The Board represents many locations butnmt�anJ�se'.' ^ � Even more fundamentally, it is becoming clear that the goals of the Open Space Distrct-to � preserve Open Space, ofcourse-ane incompatible with the needs of K8t' Unmunhurn'The � � summit isa historic site and could bean attraction mn par with Mt. Diablo and Mt.Tamna|pais. � The site ba�sfor ammen|ties-aVis�or's Center,the Cube itself, historic interpretation, � � perhaps even Hang Gliding and Backpacking camps.This beautiful and historic site deserves � to be treated as the gem it is. � � _ But these buildings and amenities would bethe antithesis of Open Space. MROSD ' after all, an Open Space District.As the saying goes, "if all you have isa hammer, everything looks like amai|".AndsoK8R[>SDyeesthestructunesandirnnnediate|ytheirrnindsatis'^tearthose down". It's becoming clear that the choice before the MROSD Board-keep the Cube or tear it down-asks the wrong question.The real question is: should MROSD own Mt. Umunhum? I've become convinced that the answer is''no°' K4RUSD does a wonderful ''obotmanaging � � Open Space. But Umunhum's summit should not be Open Space. It wants to be much more. � � A more natural steward for the summit ofUrnunhunmisthe Santa Clara County Parks/SC[pl � � While MROSD's charter is to preserve Open Space,the County Parks charter more strongly � � embraces educational and historic goals. [ountvParks has great expehenceproviding � ' histohcinterpretation, and V1s�o�sCenters, and Camping,and even Hang Gliding. Compared with any other comparable local District, SCCP is well positioned for this mission. � � S[CP is blessed with a dedicated Park Charter Fund providing it funding directly, outside of � � the Cnunty's general revenues.And asit turns out. 'ust� nnmntha�oth� [munty �oardmf � � ' � � Supervisors re-confirmed that 5CCP should focus its land acquisition efforts on sites of � "County � � VWdeS�n��anoe''' UnnunhunndeaMyfitsthatdefhniUon. Evenbetter, [ountvParks � � would bea local steward for the surnrnit''.not an absentee one. � � � | believe that MRC>SD should transfer control mfthe summit toSC[P' 5CCP could manage the � Cube and amenities at the top; MROSD could continue to administer the open spaces of the mountain.A true win/win situation.There is ample precedent for this sort of cooperation � between the two agencies. For example,at Rancho San Antonio the Open Space itself is � owned by MROSD, but the lower parking and restroom developments are provided by SCCP. � � |fK8R(]SD decides to tear down the Cube to turn the summit into Open Space,they � guarantee themselves years of lawsuits and pain. It would be far better for them to admit � that the site does not fit their mission, and instead transfer it to a more appropriate steward. � � Update on September 24:Thanks to Scott Herhold from the San Jose Mercury News for � � helping to promote this idea and ! S�ott's'���y� '^ � ,.- � � page isa great resource.Also, please take a look at . � � 2- ---Original Message----- From:Josh Moore � Sent: Monday, Seotember17, 201I1:36 PM To: pNROSD- Mt. Um / � | d like b»take a moment to encourage &4ROSDto build some more trails in the Sierra Azu| � properties.At17,Ooo acres,this area probably has the lowest density of publicly accessab|e � trails in the district. In addition,trails from Mt.Thayer to existing trails on the top such as Priest Rock and LirneKi|n and Kennedy down to Lexington Reservoir provide a whole bunch of new, exciting loop opportunities in this under used area. |'d like to also speak out in favor of a trail from Bald Mountain to the top of Mt. Umunhurn to provide access to the top without having to take the road.THiowill get a number ofintrepid hikers and bikers and equestrians off this potentially busy road and provide a nice trail connecter from the existing Barlow trail. | would like the District to take a wide view of parking staging un Bald K4opuntain, as well as improvements to the road.What is the overall plan for access to the top? How will the public � �� � � � use�rabus���ac��b»d�����d�ran��to���qu the staff a� � . ' . __-__, � board should be able to make clearer recommendations for road improvements and additional staging areas at mid mountain.Thank you for your consideration. 3. --Original Message--1 Frorn:John [arey Sent: Friday, October 05, Zo1z1:1gPK4 To: MROSD- Mt. Um Ms. Manning, Thank you for the updates. | will be out Vf town for the next meeting. � Please consider nmydruthers: � 1) It might be best f or MORSD to divest itself of the tower and property it's on if the charter of"Open Space" conflicts with keeping and running a facility for the public benefit. 2)The tower should be kept and used for public advantage... not just as viewed from afar (which is a good reason), but for display of the tower history inside AND for folks to ascend to the top for an even more spectacular view Vf the surrounding valley and open space. � That's a win,win, and whatever agency is willing to do it would have my support. After all, � open space when used as proposed, does alter nature... so what's wrong with keeping something that enhances open space enjoyment and is already there?John B' Carey, S' SJ` resident since the cold war and such real crisis like the Cuban arms standoff. 4. ---Orkgina| Message---1 ' Frmrn' Ken Nitz | - � Sent: Monday, September 17, zm121to1AK8 To: MKOSD' Mt' Um Hi Meredith, Sorry I haven't read the entirety of the documents(great job by the way!), but I was wondering if there was thought put into: 1l the evacuation routes of people upon the mountain in case ofa wildfire(ie multiple routes out,fireproof shelter, etc) 2l also |n the same vein,the use of the area for the staging mf emergency equipment during a fire or disaster.This could behelicopter landing area, large flat areas for equipment and equipment dropoft water for recharging helicopters power, etc.)thanks, see you Wed, Ken Nitz 5. --Original Message--- Frmmm: Henry Pastore||i � Sent: Monday, September 17, 2o1I2:35PK8 To: K4ROSD' Mt. Um Meredith,Thanks for the update. I clefinetly support more trails, especially the Mt.Thayer to � � Lexington basin one. Seems like that's core to the midpen mission. Personally, I support � Option 1-remnove the tower and restore the|and'The tovvers''ustgoing tobeannain1anance � � cost and safety issue down the road. I see it as an especially attractive eyesore for folks to � � display their graffeti talents. I can't believe we're even considering spending millions of � taxpayer money on this thing tm restore ittoa closed she||/hox' Henry � � � G^ l Frmnn: K4UkeVondeman Sent: Monday, September17, � PMIo1� �� P � To: MRDSD'Mt. Um Please share with all appropriate and interested parties. I hope that the "multi-use trail" will only be for hikers(including mountain bikers without their bikes)and equestrians.The � presence of bikes on trails is very destructive and intimidating to the trails,wildlife, and non- bikers. Bicycles should not be allowed in any natural area.They are inanimate objects and have no rights.There is also no right to mountain bike.That was settled in federal court in � 1994: http://mivande.nfshost.com/mtbio.htm ' it's dishonest of mountain bikers to say that � they don't have access to trails closed to bikes.They have EXACTLY the same access as everyone else-ON FOOT!Why isn't that good enough for mountain bikers?They are all � capable of walking....A favorite myth of mountain bikers is that mountain biking is no more � � harmful to wildlife, people, and the environment than hiking, and that science supports that view. Of course, it's not true.To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research � they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts(see � http-llm�v-an-de.nfs-ho-s-t.r-o-mts-cb7.-titm). | found that of the seven studies they cited,h\all � were written by mountain bikers, and(2)in every case,the authors misinterpreted their own � data, in order to come to the conclusion that they favored.They also studiously avoided � mentioning another scientific study(Wisdom et al)which did not favor mountain biking,and came to the opposite conclusions.Those were all experimental studies.Two other studies � (by White et al and by Jeff Marion)used a survey design,which is inherently incapable of � � answering that question (comparing hiking with mountain biking). | only mention them � because mountain bikers� ftendteth�mm, �utscient�icaUy, theyer�vvorth|ess Mountain- _ ' � biking accelerates erosion, creates V-shaped ruts, kiUssnnaUaninna|s and plants on and next � to the trail, drives wildlife and other trail users out of the area, and, worst of all,teaches kids � that the rough treatment of nature is okay(it's NOT!).What's good about THAP. To see exactly what harm mountain biking does to the land,watch this 5-minute video: ' For more information: I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans("pure habitat").Want to help?(| spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! O.ttp:ll .cV0 7, -----Original Message----- From: Barry Chaffin Sent: Monday, September 17, 2o1z8:03PM To: /NROSD-Mt. Um Meredith, I would like to voice my support for a new multi-use trail from the Lexington basin � tu Mt.Thayer.Thanks � � @~ l Fromm Johnny Reed Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:09PM To: MROSD- Mt. Um � Thank You for the update on the Umunhum Project. May not be able to attend.Would like to go to a meeting where you could look out a window and see the Mountain and the Tower in the distance 9. --'OrGgynaUN0esaage-- Fromn: Fred Nichols Sent:Tuesday, September 18, 20128:Z7AKA To; K8ROSD- Mt. Um Cc: Fred Nichols Subject: resendof earlier message to Scott Herho|d Dear Ms. Manning:Attached is the letter that | sent in June to Scott Herho|dwf the San Jose Mercury News in response to his column un the subject of"The Tovver'". | sent you a copy at the same time. | anmresending the message to you asnny opinion has not changed, and | � want this opinion tobe included in the record.Thank you. � June 3, IV12 Mr. Scott Herho|d, San Jose Mercury News Dear Mr. Herhold:While I understand the case you are trying to make regarding the tower on the top nf Mt. Unnunhurn, | will use your arguments regarding the structures on the tops of Mt.Tamalpais, Mt. Diablo,and Mt. Hamilton to suggest that it is now time that we restored one of our treasured mountain peaks to its natural state to honor the memory and traditions of those first"Americans"who inhabited the area for thousands of years, i.e., long before the cold war of the mid 20m century' In no way do I want to denigrate the role of those who served on top of Mt. Umunhum during the Cold War. | was serving aboard aUS Navy destroyer off the coast of Cuba during thmseinfarnous''ThirteenDaysinOctober'`of1962, stahngdovvnaSovietsubrnarinethat vve learned, decades later, was armed with o nuclear-tipped torpedo. Thus, | know o little bit about the tension nf the times and threat that vvefaced. But the relatively brief occupancy by the Air Force alone does not justify leaving an ugly hulk of structure mn the top ofthis lovely mountain that for a vastly longer period was revered in its natural state by the first inhabitants of the region. My vision for the top Mt. Umunhum would be one that retains no trace of the military installation other than the road to the top for providing access for those who cannot walk tm the top themselves. | strongly favor a shuttle service to the top sothat visitors'cars can be left at the bottom. Also at the bottom could bea visitor's center that provided informational displays of the natural and human history of the mountain, including that of the brief period of military occupancy. This isa wonderful opportunity to � demonstrate that we can return a beautiful but blighted spot to its natural state by replacing' ' � the human imprint with plantings of native vegetation, allowing the mountaintop ecosystem � tm restore itself for the enjoyment of all, human and otherwise. � Yours truly, Frederic H. Nichols cc:"Meredith KNanning^'< � 1u- l F.o"".~ Sent:Wednesday, Seotember19, 2012 11:55AM � � To: 8AROSD-Mt. Urn � Dear Ms. Mann nks for letting me know about the meeting. Unfortunately, | dun't � have the means of getting there mr know of anybody else who will be attending. | don't � drive at night because of vision problems. If you have access to my original letter, you are � � aware of my original opinion regarding the Radar base--it should be preserved!! It is a part of � � our history. K4y late husband and | did visit the Cube on Armed Forces Day many years ago � when it was open tm the public.The view was magnificent! | was privileged to meet one of � the ymun�airmen at0�a�satHm|ySpi� .Spirit He introduced hinmse�torneafterservices � � ended.At that time, |was a member nf the choir, playing guitar. He stated that hehad � started teaching himself guitar. |volunteered tm work with him sohe would come tommy � house once a week when he was off-duty.After some months, his tour of duty was over and he returned to his home in the Mid-West. Some weeks later, I received a letter from him, � thanking mne for all the help | have given him.The Cube should be preserved for many � reasons.We need to be reminded why it was built in the first place. Fortunately, Moffett Field is be saved, so should The Cube.Yours truly,Joanne Kezer. P.S. I am a native San � Franciscan who remembers Pearl Harbor and WWII. � � xi. -----Original Message--- Fromm;JDWhitaker � Sent:Wednesday, September 19, 2o1z6:4oP&4 To: K4ROSD- Mt. Um � Hi Meredith, I had planned to attend this evening, but am sitting with my granddaughter instead.At this point, I'm just one of many disappointed veterans that feel that our early � inclusion as stakeholders was nothing but a sham.What, if anything,will commemorate the sites military history? In particular, will the USAF service members and dependents that lost their lives while serving on Mt. Urnunhunnbe remembered.The Cold War was not agame. In � my opinion,A|mnadanAFS history should not be casually swept from the skyline.The access � road and flight training accidents claimed more than a few lives. K8y regards to your team,- � � =JD=' � 12- --Original Message-- � Sent:7hursda& Septernber2O, 2O1l1:]3P&4 � � Toz /NROSD- MtUm [c: To Whom it may concern: | grew up in Cambrian Park area of San Jose, and saw the radar � tower from nny front garden every day. |twas always off limits, and def ineda generation of � folks like rne growing upinthe Cold War era. It's a part of history that | lived every day mfnmy � life. It should be saved for the same reason that the buildings on Angel's Island in SF Bay � were saved when writing from Chinese immigrants was found inscribed on the walls.The � radar tower may not have poetry in Chinese script carved into its walls, but it is an historical and cultural landmark like no other in this area. It could be turned into a cool educational center--like exists atArastradero Park and Alpine Pond in the Mid Peninsula Open Space District. I can't begin to understand why the Mid Peninsula Open Space District wishes to � opt for a "scorched earth" approach to erasing this monument of important Silicon Valley � � history!There are no other similar monuments to this era, of which I'm aware, and it would increase visitors to this park! It could become an educational destination for buses of school children studying American history and Santa Clara Valley VrSanta Cruz Mountain history. | believe itis very short sighted tm tear it down for the sake ofimmediate expedience. Like all � cultural and historical landmarks, it can never be built again! Regards, Peter Tommerup � 13. ----Original � � �=, � From: Chris pNossing[chris@tha|pay'cmm] Sent: Monday, September 24' 20125:25PM To: KARC}SD-Mt. Um Subject: Mt. Urn Radar Tower � Hi, I would like to express my desire that the MROSD demolish the radar tower on Mt. Unmunhurn' |tisan ugly building and despite what others may say, has no real historical or � cultural value. Let's restore Mt. Urn to what is looked like before the Air Force was there. I � � amn active in supporting open spaces, being a contributor to POST,the Audubon Society,The Greenbelt Alliance and other environmental organizations. Back in the late 199os I led a group of community activists to prevent IBM from turning some of its land into a housing development in Almaden. Every day I see the radar tower on Mt. Urn and think"why do we � � heepsuchanug|ycmncreteboxmnthetmpofthehkshestnnountain}'". | urgetheK4R[>SDto demolish the radar tower. � 14. -----Original Message— Fromm: piers-Sutton Sent:Thursday, October o4, 2o1z3:4zPyN � To: � |t/s already a shame the supporting structures will be torn down. Please gm with option 3for � reasons others have so eloquently stated. | understand and appreciate your organizations � desire to return things to green, and I support it, but if your organization pulls a PETA I (and � others | suspect)will have nm qualms about doing all | can to hinder your efforts ingeneral. Don't pull aPETA,thank you. � � � � 15, | ----- From: Bill& Linda Des|er Sent: Friday, October o5, Zo124:z4PK4 To: MROSD- Mt. Um I am unable to attend the October 17 meeting, but feel I must again input my strong feelings that the Santa Clara valley needs to keep the radar tower structure asa landmark and � � reminder ofan important era in our history. | understand the challenging economic issues � but feel that taking it down would forever rob us of this important structure. I hope the board finds a way to preserve it. | do favor the idea that maybe Santa Clara County could -- take over rnanagernentof the park afterK4ROSD has done it's job you folks are doing � � great work. pNy friends and | hike in your open spaces almost every week and you have made rny retirement life full of great times!THANKS!!! � 16. ---OrKgfnaUMessage---- From: Noe||e George Sent:Wednesday, October 1O, 2o1z9:05PK4 To: MR<JSD-Mt. Um | vote for keeping it. � 17- -----Original Message--- � Frwmn: DyanSJ [dyan'sevi|| 'Vnes@cmrncast'netl Sent:Wednesday, October/o, 2u1Z7:2gPM 7o: MROSD- Mt. Um � Subject please keep the radar tower � Hi K8eredith,Appmedate your willingness tV listen to opinions via email. | have been a resident of Willow Glen for the past lo years.When |first moved to the bay area, | had ahard time figuring out which way was which.The landmarks on the mountains helped me navigate. Now, I have a 3-year old son,and one of the things we love to do is look up into the mountains and see Mt Hamilton and Mt. Umunhum (pronounced Mynumbum).We even recreated the scene in our livingroom with upside down bowls for mountains and a box of paperclips as the radar tower(Mt Hamilton and the Stanford radio telescope were also � represented). I would love to continue to see the radar tower on the mountain and,when nny son gets older,go and visit it and reminisce about the paperclip box.Thanks, Dyan Seville-Jones Engineer/mom v0. -----Original Message--- Fnmmm: Bart Thie|ges Sent:Wednesday, October 10/ 2V1I1:27PK4 To: K8R{}SD' Mt. Urn |'d like to register my opinion that that the old USAF tovveratop Mt. Ummunhumn should remain. |tisahistorica| site and could berepurpnsedas a visitor lookout too. 19- l Message---- From: Larry Ames Sent:Tuesday, October 09, 2O120:34PM To: Cc /NROSD'Mt. Um FYI,from W1idPen' Mt. Unnunhurn, south mf San Jose, is being transferred from the military to | public use! While most ofthe plans are non-controversiaL there is one point of contention: should the old (historic?)radar tower be preserved, removed, or something in-between? It � can be seen from the valley floor--that little white box at the summit: should it be preserved as a historic artifact or a visitor's center, or should it be removed and the mountain restored to a more natural state?(personally, | think the building should be stabilized, painted to seal � any contaminants, and then fixed up with a rmoftopvisitors' center/vievvingp|atfornn. The building may not be pretty, but it does represent a major chapter of our history. Ask | related question: Should the old prison buildings be removed from Alcatraz Island—lose � some history, have a nicer view,yet lose a visitor attraction? As trees grow upon Mt. Urn, the roof would still provide stunning views of Silicon Valley.) This is your last chance to express an opinion! 7—Larry ig. -----Ori.~�yoa( Message----- � � Sent:Tuesday, September I5, lV124:19PyN � To: BOARD;Clerk;Vicky Gou; General Information R�� Name: Robert � ' Last Name: Dennis Ward / Location: San Jose Raze the Mt. UrnCube! |tisan unsightly bit of Cold War detritus ofnohistorical consequence' In addition to being the best outcome, razing it is also the cheapest' � Continued on next page .Air Farce Air Force MY r-www . academyadm .1ssions . com www . academyadmissions . com r SS J � N -A s ,�� ate 4o �- V\ I � A�wo A-1•ID s • �� t.�S� ��2� �'L-� l dw�� t 5 �•t�Y 9� �G��� L! 1.80C.443.9266 • OFFICE OF ADMISSIONS • 2334 CADET DRIVE SUITE 200 0 USAF ACADEMY,CO 0 80840-5025 1 900.443.9266 • CFFI E OF ADMISSIONS • 2304 CADET DRIVE •SUITE 200 • USAF ACADEMY.CO•80840-5025 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Lauren Sanchez San Jose California 95118 United States 9/17/2012 Anne Fields San Jose California 95118 United States 9/18/2012 Christine Gibbins San Jose California 95125 United States 9/18/2012 Deborah Nichols San Jose California 95128 United States 9/19/2012 Elizabeth Whamond San Jose California 95112 United States 9/19/2012 Eric Serdahl Sunnyvale California 94089 United States 9/20/2012 Peter Tommerup Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/20/2012 Hal Wilson Taylorsville Utah 84129-6004 United States 9/20/2012 Mary Humphrey Gilroy California 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Joseph Buckle San Jose California 95111 United States 9/21/2012 Madeline Lynch San Francisco California 94109 United States 9/21/2012 ROBERT MANG Gilroy California 95021 United States 9/21/2012 JOAN BUCKLEY GILROY California 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Dushan Gasich San Jose California 95120 United States 9/21/2012 Rich Rohme Watsonville California 95076 United States 9/22/2012 elisa trimble Broken Arrow Oklahoma 74012 United States 9/22/2012 Frederick Berger San Jose California 95120 United States 9/23/2012 Carl Wang San Jose California 95118 United States 9/23/2012 Joe Navratil San Jose California 95118 United States 9/24/2012 Cass Kalinski San Jose California 95128 United States 9/24/2012 Brad Gyger Los Gatos California 95032-4026 United States 9/24/2012 shedy berrios jacksonville nc North Carolina 28540 United States 9/24/2012 Daniel Buszkiewicz San Jose California 95136 United States 9/24/2012 Diane Main San Jose California 95125 United States 9/24/2012 Larry McColloch Santa Clara California 95054 United States 9/24/2012 Tim Jordan San Jose California 95120 United States 9/24/2012 Lance Kuempel Livermore California 94550 United States 9/24/2012 Ken Helwig Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 9/24/2012 Vic Balagot San Jose California 95148 United States 9/24/2012 Mark Lyons San Jose California 95136 United States 9/24/2012 Tom Pecota St Helena California 94574 United States 9/24/2012 Scott Johnson San Jose California 95124 United States 9/24/2012 1 of 16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Craig Jones Hayward California 94544 United States 9/24/2012 Doug Blasco Livermore California 94551 United States 9/24/2012 Jarda Skyba San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 George Leavell San Jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Bob Hedgpeth Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 9/25/2012 Martin Knutson Los Gatos California 95033 United States 9/25/2012 Eric Bohl Capitola California 95010 United States 9/25/2012 Rachel C Fresno California 93630 United States 9/25/2012 Julie Hall San Jose California 95129 United States 9/25/2012 Shelley Berger San Jose California 95120 United States 9/2 512 0 1 2 Joseph Kerley anchorage Alaska 99504 United States 9/25/2012 Richard Ornellas San jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Michael O'Halloran Santa Clara California 95050 United States 9/25/2012 Marcy Nunes San Jose California 95124 United States 9/25/2012 Thomas Stroebel San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Brenda Swiney San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Bob Peterson San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Karen Friedrichs San Jose California 95129 United States 9/25/2012 Theodore Olson San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Terry Johnson Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/25/2012 Earl Stutes San Jose California 95124 United States 9/25/2012 Brendan Ryan San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Charles Smith San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Marion MacKinnon Cupertino California 95014 United States 9/25/2012 Todd Haney San Jose California 95118 United States 9/25/2012 Amina Atique San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Steve Larson San Jose 95136 Senegal 9/25/2012 Bill Shoenhair San Jose California 95128 United States 9/25/2012 Arthur Blackwell Evergreen Colorado Do unto others United States 9/25/2012 Marion Farber San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Ron Dorsey Scotts Valley California 95066 United States 9/25/2012 Dave Ganser Pleasanton California 94588 United States 9/25/2012 2of16 printed:10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On DAN MCFARLAND san Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Jack Longley Los Gatos California 95030-4340 United States 9/25/2012 IRMA LONGLEY Los Gatos California 95030 United States 9/25/2012 Nathan Cook Campbell California 95008 United States 9/25/2012 Herb Mesler San Carlos California 94070 United States 9/25/2012 John Dannenberg San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Andrew Hyslop Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/25/2012 steve hein San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Susan Clark San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 judi kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Shelly Best San Jose California 95118 United States 9/25/2012 Jodi DeWitt Seattle Washington 98101 United States 9/25/2012 Uly vonHuene San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 sandra cannizzaro san jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Denise Bruno San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 John Nast Gilroy California 95020 United States 9/25/2012 Maryrose Hutchinson San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Drew Marsh San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Sharon Lum San Jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Marcy Battaglia Los Gatos California 95030 United States 9/25/2012 Katherine Bussey Fayetteville North Carolina 28306 United States 9/25/2012 vernon hyde san jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 James Owen San Jose California 95124 United States 9/25/2012 John Dvorak San Jose California 95125 United States 9/25/2012 Karen Buesing Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/25/2012 Bobby Moorhatch San Jose California 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Susan Johnson Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/25/2012 Amber McDonald Fair Oaks California 95628 United States 9/25/2012 Christina La Oberhauser San Jose California 95133 United States 9/25/2012 Richard Kegley San Jose California 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Kimberly Wood San Jose California 95120 United States 9/25/2012 Cissy Brazil San Jose California 95123 United States 9/26/2012 3of16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Julie Kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 Jacob Finkle Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Pat Tapley Cupertinp California 95014 United States 9/26/2012 Ed Von Runnen San Jose California 95119 United States 9/26/2012 charlie bogen Junction City Kansas 66441 United States 9/26/2012 Jon Field San Nose California 95118 United States 9/26/2012 Gregory Farris San Jose California 95123 United States 9/26/2012 Jeanne Dittman San Jose California 95132 United States 9/26/2012 Gary Fischer San Jose California 95124 United States 9/26/2012 Carol Treat Post Falls Idaho 93954 United States 9/26/2012 Steve Sawyer Menlo Park California 94025 United States 9/26/2012 David Evans Santa Cruz California 95060 United States 9/26/2012 Larry Przywara Mountain View California 94040 United States 9/26/2012 Howard Cohen Palo Alto California 94306 United States 9/26/2012 Brian Kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 Ken Parsons Milpitas California 95035 United States 9/26/2012 Martin Junkar San Jose California 95118 United States 9/26/2012 Lisa Hettler-Smith San Jose California 95112 United States 9/26/2012 Allan Hamilton San Jose California 95120-4568 United States 9/26/2012 Jim Russell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Don DeHart San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 John OKeefe San Jose California 95124 United States 9/26/2012 Christine Russell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Matt Wheeler Los Altos California 94024 United States 9/26/2012 Kristin Khanna Ponte Vedra Beach Florida 32082 United States 9/26/2012 John Havens Windsor California 95492 United States 9/26/2012 Joel Gartland Palo Alto California 94303 United States 9/26/2012 madeline wollbrinck san jose California 95124 United States 9/26/2012 Maryke Williams San Jose California 95120 United States 9/26/2012 Ruth Hewson Magnolia Texas 77355 United States 9/26/2012 andrea morton San Jose California 95118 United States 9/26/2012 Tom Wight San Jose California 95111 United States 9/27/2012 4of16 printed:10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Carol Zuvella Milpitas California 95035-6510 United States 9/27/2012 Mae Lin Bishop San Jose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 nikki morton San Jose California 95118 United States 9/27/2012 Toh-Bee Syn San Jose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Kathleen Norman Pendleton Oregon 97801 United States 9/27/2012 Elizabeth Christenson Greenbrae California 94904 United States 9/27/2012 Genevieve Haney San Jose California 95112 United States 9/27/2012 Robert Dietrich Richmond California 94801 United States 9/27/2012 Judi Souza San Jose California 95125 United States 9/27/2012 Ellen Roy San Jose California 95129 United States 9/27/2012 Gaye McClure Twin Falls Idaho 83301 United States 9/27/2012 Regina Syn SAN JOSE California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Erin Kelleher San Jose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Omar Villarreal Gilroy California 95020 United States 9/27/2012 Heather Murray San Jose California 95124 United States 9/27/2012 osvaldo cadena san jose California 95112 United States 9/27/2012 Sandy&Brian Serpa San Jose California 95123 United States 9/27/2012 Jeff Singewald Mountain View California 94040 United States 9/27/2012 Michaela Baker San Jose California 95124 United States 9/27/2012 JIM DONEGAN Sa nJose California 95120 United States 9/27/2012 LORETTA DEAGEN Saratoga California 95070 United States 9/28/2012 Rob Lion Redwood City California 94062-3105 United States 9/28/2012 Thomas Mangano Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/28/2012 James Shaw San Jose California 95123 United States 9/28/2012 Kendra Hershey Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/28/2012 Greg Azevedo San Jose California 95124 United States 9/28/2012 Sandra clark Fremont California 94539 United States 9/28/2012 Larry Bursch San Jose California 95125-5043 United States 9/28/2012 Ann Leever San Jose California 95125 United States 9/28/2012 Michael Hazarian San Jose California 95125 United States 9/28/2012 Daniel Biesterveld San Jose California 95125 United States 9/28/2012 Ken Miller San Jose California 95125-3341 United States 9/29/2012 5of16 printed:10/12/2012,12:56 PM 2012.10.10.Umunhum NEW Petitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Alison Pangburn San Jose California 95125 United States 9/29/2012 Dave Reinoehl Campbell California 95008 United States 9/29/2012 Rajwinder Kaur Fremont California 94536 United States 9/29/2012 Douglas Miller Portland Oregon 97213 United States 9/29/2012 Tabitha Evans San Jose California 95120 United States 9/29/2012 Grace Li Mountain View California 94043 United States 9/29/2012 matt black Oakland California 94610 United States 9/29/2012 Matt Wales San Jose California 95132 United States 9/29/2012 Loureen Giordano San Jose California 95110 United States 9/30/2012 Hans and Diane Ernst Los Gatos California 95032 United States 9/30/2012 Sharon Fiekowsky Los Altos California 94024 United States 9/30/2012 Neal Weinstein San Jose California 95120 United States 9/30/2012 Joseph Hennequin Boise Idaho 83709 United States 10/1/2012 William Storck San Jose California 95130 United States 10/1/2012 Cathy Baird San Carlos California 94070 United States 10/1/2012 Tony Leaman San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 gait gift campbell California 95008 United States 10/2/2012 Stephanie Leaman San Jose California 95125 United States 1 0/212 0 1 2 Diane Leaman San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 John Rowell Los Gatos California 95032 United States 10/2/2012 Dan Summers San Jose California 95118 United States 10/2/2012 Rachel Ramirez San Jose California 95125 United States 10/2/2012 jamy tays brentwood California 94513 United States 10/3/2012 SALVADORE SERIO SAN JOSE California 95118 United States 10/3/2012 William Allfrey San Jose California 95118 United States 10/3/2012 Katie Fong Taipei 11151 Taiwan 10/4/2012 Julie Anne San Jose California 95120 United States 10/4/2012 Jojan Antony San Jose California 95119 United States 10/4/2012 joshy varghese san jose California 95119 United States 10/4/2012 Carmen Sanders San Jose California 95130 United States 10/4/2012 Piers Sutton Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 10/4/2012 David Hicks Sunnyvale California 94085 United States 10/5/2012 6of16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx signatures SIGNATURES Total Signature Count: 204 Name City State Zip Code Country Signed On Gregory Hobbs Sunnyvale California 94087 United States 10/6/2012 Andy Hamilton San Jose California 95120 United States 10/6/2012 Aaron Andrade San Jose California 95136 United States 10/6/2012 Julian Gomez Palo Alto California 94303 United States 10/6/2012 Marie Bombardier San Marcos California 92078 United States 10/7/2012 Vladimir Gorshkov San Jose California 95120 United States 10/7/2012 Scott Lesch San Jose California 95112 United States 10/7/2012 Paul Fahey Campbell California 95008 United States 10/8/2012 Kathleen Fahey Campbell California 95008 United States 10/8/2012 Michael Bena San Jose California 95136 United States 10/8/2012 John Hanhauser San Jose California 95123 United States 10/8/2012 Sharon Nienhaus Santa Clara California 95051 United States 10/9/2012 7of16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM f 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment The Umunhum Radar tower has been my view from my front yard since I was a small child. I am in my fifties at that time. The tower is a landmark for the south bay. It survived the Loma Prieta earthquake.The tower is part of our history and can provide educational benefits for more generations to come.The tower should stay in place. There is room for the tower and there can still be open space use around it. The tower could be used for a command center Anne Fields San Jose CA 95118 United States 9/18/2012 for emergencies.There is no need to tear it down. William Hough San Jose CA 95112 United States 9/19/2012 This is an important piece of local history and should not be destroyed. It is a very important historical building. It symbolizes a significant period in our history. If you value history,then let it stand. If you don't,then tear it down. I say,specific monuments have Eric Serdahl Sunnyvale CA 94089 United States 9/20/2012 value beyond the dollars, let it stand. I grew up in Cambrian Park area of San Jose, and saw the radar tower from my front garden every day. It was always off limits,and defined a generation of folks like me growing up in the Cold War era. It's a part of history that I lived every day of my life. It should be saved for the same reason that the buildings on Angel's Island in SF Bay were saved when writing from Chinese immigrants was found inscribed on the walls.The radar tower may not have poetry in Chinese script carved into its walls, but it is an historical and cultural landmark like no other in this area. It could be turned into a cool educational center—like exists at Arastradero Park and Alpine Pond. 1 can't begin to understand why the Mid Peninsula Open Space District wishes to opt for a"scorched earth"approach to erasing this monument of important Silicon Valley history!There are no other similar monuments to this era, and it would Peter Tommerup Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/20/2012 increase visitors to this park! Because it is just plain cool looking when you look up their on the skyline ridge! Rawley Douglas San Jose CA United States 9/20/2012 The city of San Jose has no skyline, Let's at least keep this tower alive! Spent three years on that Hill.Served to keep the Russians at bay during the"Cold War." The building is now a symbol of a place in that history. The weather was sometimes violent up there.We lost a roof from our house during a thunderstorm. Not a single shingle was ever found. I have never seen a place whith such a variety of animals:snakes,bobcats,boar hogs,foxes,deer,and more. It snowed up there sometimes."Nostalgia"is the name of that tune whenever 1 think of that mountain top a.We did waht we could to do our duty up there; many of us were raising a family at the same time.We all recall the houses and buildings up there, One should remain as a symbol of all of the personnel who manned and kept the Hal Wilson Taylorsville UT 84129-6004 United States 9/20/2012 place organized and functional to help keep peace. Mary Humphrey Gilroy CA 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Historical preservation. gael hall bampbell CA 95008 United States 9/21/2012 Because it is a part of our history and is an iconic landmark of our bay area. JOAN BUCKLEY GILROY CA 95020 United States 9/21/2012 Part of the history of the valley Dushan Gasich San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/21/2012 Historic value. 8of16 printed:10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xisx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment Rich Rohme Watsonville CA 95076 United States 9/2 212 0 1 2 This is part of our history and should be saved to teach our children our history. This tower is a historic landmark and relic of the cold war and should be preserved. Without Frederick Berger San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/23/2012 it how will I find my way home! Hello, I am a long time resident(30+years)of the Bay area,a MROSD volunteer, and an avid open space user. The Cube is a part of our local landscape and history that I would like to see preserved. I encourage the District to explore options on retaining the Cube rather than tearing it down. Thank you, Cass Kalinski San Jose CA 95128 United States 9/24/2012 Cass Brad Gyger Los Gatos CA 95032-4026 United States 9/24/2012 Living in Los Gatos, it is an important part of history the public should be able to enjoy. The cube atop Mount Umunhum is a part of local history that affected our whole country. It's also an area landmark that we all look to on clear days. My young child can spot it from all over the valley. Open it as a visitor center,and it will bring many people to the top of"Mt Um,"where they can learn about its importance and also how to help protect both historical Diane Main San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/24/2012 places and open spaces. Larry McColloch Santa Clara CA 95054 United States 9/24/2012 It is a valley land mark that I've been raised with. Lance Kuempel Livermore CA 94550 United States 9/24/2012 The Radar Tower is a part of Bay Area history. It should be preserved for future generations. Ken Helwig Scotts Valley CA 95066 United States 9/24/2012 Historical significance and educational purposes Mark Lyons San Jose CA 95136 United States 9/24/2012 This is part of this valleys history! I was born and raised in San Jose and can remember when the tower still operated. Save it Tom Pecota St Helena CA 94574 United States 9/24/2012 please. The radar tower is one of the few landmarks in the south bay. Growing up in San Jose,there were three main visual landmarks that I used to look at across the valley. Those were the original blimp hanger at Moffet field,the observatory on Mt. Hamilton,and the radar tower on Mt Umunhum. Now that the blimp hangar is being dismantled it would be a tragedy to also Scott Johnson San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/24/2012 destroy the radar tower. Craig Jones Hayward CA 94544 United States 9/24/2012 Air Force radar vet. It is history. But also,with it there, it explains why the mountain top was decapitated.If it is Doug Blasco Livermore CA 94551 United States 9/24/2012 removed,then rebuild the mountain to it's previous state. Jarda Skyba San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 1 live here George Leavell San Jose CA 95119 United States 9/25/2012 1 am a USAF veteran I feel a part of its history having patrolled those mountains for years and forming friendships Bob Hedgpeth Scotts Valley CA 95066 United States 9/25/2012 with staff there. The Almaden AFB deserves preservation as a part of our bay area history, much like the Martin Knutson Los Gatos CA 94022 United States 9/25/2012 hangar at Moffet field. 9of16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment Joseph Kerley anchorage AK 99504 United States 9/25/2012 as an ex-San Jose resident,the tower is a symbol of home. Richard Ornellas San jose CA 95119 United States 9/25/2012 Historical preservation Michael O'Halloran Santa Clara CA 95050 United States 9/25/2012 Historic landmark Having been involved in the cold war for many years, it would be a shame to lose the tower. Bob Peterson San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 1 enjoy looking at it everyday from my home. Theodore Olson San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 We live where we can see it and feel it is a National Monument The tower is a landmark for people in the valley.Without the tower, most people wouldn't Terry Johnson Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/25/2012 know where Mt. Umunhum is. It's a part of our history and our heritage. Save the tower! Earl Stutes San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/25/2012 1 enjoy hiking in the area. When I look out my bedroom window and see the tower, I see an important historical icon that reminds us of perhaps the most dangerous era of US history. We are better off today due to the men and women that served at facilities such as Almaden AFS. The tower needs to remain as a memorial to all who served and as a historical icon of how the United States Charles Smith San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 has progressed. I value the tower's historical significance,and don't want that to be forgotten. It is a landmark in the valley, and I often point it out to visitors. My father was in the RCAF in Canada,based in Newfoundland during WWII. He was watching our east coast while the people in this tower were guarding the west coast,so it has personal meaning to me. Kirby Cove,facing the Golden Gate bridge, has bunkers of some sort,without a visitor centre, as well as Marion camping and picnic facilities,and it adds to the interest of the site. If you know the history of MacKinnon Cupertino CA 95014 United States 9/25/2012 an area,your understanding is that much richer. It is an important part of our valley's history and should be preserved for future generations. Also, I can see the tower out my kitchen window and look for it every morning when I'm Todd Haney San Jose CA 95118 United States 9/25/2012 having my coffee. Financially...Very Expensive to remove it. Some contractor is licking his chops for that contract. Emotionally: Grew up with this. Wish they could re-install the dish. Philisophically: Provides a history of the steps taken to protect our country. Looks like it would be a great Steve Larson San Jose 95136 Senegal 9/25/2012 hang glider launch point eventually. Bill Shoenhair Cupertino CA 95014 United States 9/25/2012 The historical properties of the site should be preserved for our children Arthur Blackwell Evergreen CO Do unto others United States 9/25/2012 The SFBA is hell bent on destroying it's history. Dave Ganser Pleasanton CA 94588 United States 9/25/2012 The tower is an important landmark in SC County and a reminder of the Cold War 10 of 16 printed:10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumN EWPetitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment grew up in Almaden Valley in the late 60's and early 70's looking at the tower every morning DAN prior to my walk to Henderson school. My dad reminded me we always had an angel MCFARLAND san jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 looking out for our welfare. he was referringing to the tower and the job it held Jack Longley Los Gatos CA 95030-4340 United States 9/25/2012 Historic Sight Herb Mesler San Carlos CA 94070 United States 9/25/2012 History that should be preserved Back in 1969,while attending Leland High School, I visited the Alamaden AFS, because I Andrew Hyslop Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/25/2012 dated the station commander's daughter! Great place, had lots of fun and good memories. sieve hein San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/25/2012 1 love hiking in quicksilver park with the old tower in the background judi kelleher San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 It's an Almaden Valley landmark!! Uly vonHuene San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 Let's not destroy a piece of Bay Area history. when I see it I know I'm home. We should be proud of it, and not get rid of a landmark. sandra cannizzaro san jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 landmark As a long term resident of Santa Clara County I have meny memories of the cube. Some good,some not so good. 1 have hiked the hills before and after the cube was"on duty"and recall saome problems flying model airplanes in its shadow. It does have historical significance and our society is too inclined to forget the past. John Nast Gilroy CA 95020 United States 9/25/2012 John Nast Maryrose Hutchinson San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/25/2012 This is a piece of our history that should be allowed to remain for future generations. see it every day, someday I hope to be able to Mt bike to it. It would be ashame to have Drew Marsh San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/25/2012 such an iconic symbol disappear. It's been part of the landscape since 1 can remember. It served a historical purpose and Katherine Bussey Fayetteville, 28306 United States 9/25/2012 should remain there as a reminder. vernon hyde san jose CA 95125 United States 9/25/2012 It is part of the history of the area John Dvorak San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/25/2012 1 served in Army Air Corps when tower was built. The Radar Station is part of our history. 1 want to always know that the Tower is there. I Karen Buesing Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/25/2012 love seeing it each day. Keep it always. It is a historic landmark that sets that hill apart. I always enjoy telling visitors the story of it. Susan Johnson Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/25/2012 When I'm stuck in traffic, heading south on 85, 1 enjoy looking at it! Richard Kegley San Jose CA 95119 United States 9/25/2012 It's part of our city, state, and country history. It is important to preserve a part of history. Making this into a visitor's center is a brilliant idea. Cissy Brazil San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/26/2012 1 back Sam Drake totally. Gregory Farris San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/26/2012 History for our area 11 of 16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumN EW Petitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment Constructed in 1962,the tower"supported a 85.5-ton General Electric model AN/FPS-24 long range search radar antenna"sail"used to detect incoming hostile aircraft during the Cold War."Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower IS a piece of Santa Clara Valley history AND U.S. Jeanne Dittman San Jose CA 95132 United States 9/26/2012 history that should be preserved. I grew up in Campbell. The Tower was a vista point on my inner horizon. A young boy, gazing and dreaming, long before Silicon Valley. I still take great delight in gazing at that Gary Fischer San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/26/2012 horizon and that Tower. Steve Sawyer Menlo Park CA 94025 United States 9/26/2012 It is an important landmark for my close friend, Gary. I've cycled to the top many times over decades always with the Tower in sight. Further-it's a Cold War relic that worthily reminds Silicon Valley that technology entrepreneurship is not the David Evans Santa Cruz CA 95060 United States 9/26/2012 whole story here. Larry Przywara Mountain View CA 94040 United States 9/26/2012 Historical significance. Brian Kelleher San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/26/2012 It is an Almaden.landmark and the way I know where I am It looks interesting, I'd like to hike there and see it. Why tear down something that people are used to and causes no harm?It's like a piece of Martin Junkar San Jose CA 95118 United States 9/26/2012 rock or an old castle on the hilltop. Lisa Hettler-Smith San Jose CA 95112 United States 9/26/2012 This is an Historic Resource,and unique to our valley and it's history. I grew up in Campbell and have always enjoyed looking up at the mountain and seeing the Jim Russell Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/26/2012 Radar tower--it welcomes you back home to the area. I have lived in the Valley for over 50 years. This is as much a part(or a bigger part)than Don DeHart San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/26/2012 some of our other historical landmarks or buildings came to Santa Clara Valley at age 14 years. This landmark looked amazing and technical Christine Russell Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/26/2012 to me. It says this is a happening place to be! Matt Wheeler Los Altos CA 94024 United States 9/26/2012 childhood memories Kristin Khanna Ponte Vedra Beach FL 32082 United States 9/26/2012 Why dismantle this reminder of those who served It is a great landmark of history for the Santa Clara Valley. Much like the firewatch tower on Mt Tam, it is an inspiration to those of us who grew up looking up at it over the years. It should be made into some sort of historical site similar to the firewatch on Tam. Why throw away a great piece of history like that. The national parks did not do that with the gun emplacements on the Marin Headlands,why then should this be torn down? I say fix it up for John Havens Windsor CA 95492 United States 9/26/2012 future generations to learn from. madeline wollbrinck san jose CA 95124 United States 9/26/2012 its the one thing my grandpa used to talk to me about. Ruth Hewson Magnolia TX 77355 United States 9/26/2012 It is important to preserve historical items in the South Bay. 12 of 16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.Umunhum NE W Petitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment 1 grew up in Campbell and San Jose.The cube has been on the skyline for almost as long as I can remember.When the Air Force abandoned it,we were lead to believe it would be Tom Wight San Jose CA 95111 United States 9/27/2012 cleaned up and opened up to the public as a museum.That needs to occur. Too many old landmarks have fallen. We should be able to save those that are important to us. Whenever I'm away from home and flying into San Jose upon returning I see that Carol Zuvella Milpitas CA 95035-6510 United States 9/27/2012 landmark and smile because it says I'm almost home. I grew up with this radar station, have been up there many times when i was young and have Mae Lin Bishop San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 used it as landmark-knowing I was near home. It is a historical landmark that has been here since 1 came to San Jose 50+years ago...it Toh-Bee Syn San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 would be a shame to tear it down. Kathleen Norman Pendleton OR 97801 United States 9/27/2012 It's a landmark and should be preserved! 1 was born and raised in Almaden and that tower was a hallmark of my childhood. Today it Elizabeth serves as a vivid reminder of the Cold War for an entire generation that has no idea what that Christenson Greenbrae CA 94904 United States 9/27/2012 meant. It should stay,and have status&protection as a historical relic. Robert Dietrich Richmond CA 94801 United States 9/27/2012 Because of it's historic significance. Judi Souza San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/27/2012 History&beauty Everything eles is being taken away from us in the last 4 years;the landmarks of our country Gaye McClure Twin Falls ID 83301 United States 9/27/2012 must be saved!! This has always been what my siblings and I learned to look for when we were little and had to point which way was home.After going away to school in LA,when 1 would drive back and saw it coming up 101 and looping around 851 knew 1 was home. Don't tear down"The Box"!! Erin Kelleher San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 Please! Sandy&Brian Serpa San Jose CA 95123 United States 9/27/2012 It is a significant landmark in SJ. My grandparents homesteaded the Almaden Valley(Athenour)and the radar tower was like a watch tower over the valley for many many years. It is a signature of the valley and one Jeff Singewald Mountain View CA 94040 United States 9/27/2012 that should be retained for historical significance. Mireia Barbero Barcelona 8002 Spain 9/27/2012 It is a landmark. JIM DONEGAN Sa nJose CA 95120 United States 9/27/2012 It's our landmark LORETTA Mt. Umunhum and the air station has a historic value to all of us who have been in the area DEAGEN Saratoga CA 95070 United States 9/28/2012 over the past 50 years. Thomas Mangano Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/28/2012 Important to the valley Kendra Hershey Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/28/2012 1 live nearby and enjoy spotting this landmark from hikes near and far. 13 of 16 printed:10/1212012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment Life long resident of SJ,visited the AFB as a child,visit the MROSD area regularly and believe the building may have long term value as a Visitor Center to house history about the Greg Azevedo San Jose CA 95124 United States 9/28/2012 AFB, Ohlone, Natural History and SC Valley history. Sandra clark Fremont CA 94539 United States 9/28/2012 A landmark for years of my home in the foothills below it. Larry Bursch San Jose CA 95125-5043 United States 9/28/2012 Historic sight in San Jose The Mt. Umunhum Radar Tower is an important historical artifact from an important sociopolitical period in global history. It provides a striking physical reference for teaching the future how the cold war was played out and how it affected the people during that time. It is a period devoid of visual reference,mainly because it was a confrontation played outside the view of the world.This alone should justify the preservation of the radar tower. But of even greater importance is the historical value to the South Bay.This plain,simple, concrete tower oversaw the transition from an agrarian valley which was the world leader in the plentiful harvest of foods to the world leader in the harvest of ideas.The military-industrial complex,which saw it's genesis in the Cold War, created this tower out of the international escalation of threat and defense.Without passing judgement on the moral or political correctness of military-industrial complex, it produced the confluence of people who planted the seeds of intelligence, innovation,creativity and commerce which defines the South Bay today. The loss of the tower,while a success to entropy,would be a failure to the recollection of the past, understanding of the present and the hope of the future of this great region. This tower is the South Bay's link between the past, present and future. Michael Hazarian San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/28/2012 1 want this to remain as a reminder to everyone that for a lot of people and for a long time this kept us safe from an enemy that wanted us destroyed(no longer)now we have another group of counties that want to distroy us. I wish it was as easy to find them before they attack Daniel Biesterveld San Jose CA 95125 United States 9/28/2012 us. The Tower is a symbol of the defense of the country with earlier technology,a reminder that even the West Coast was attacked by submarine launched fire balloons in WWII,and watching the seas was critical to the mainland's defence. Ken Miller San Jose CA 95125-3341 United States 9/29/2012 Doug Miller portland OR 97213 United States 9/29/2012 statement of history.without history we'll just do it again the same way. Tabitha Evans San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/29/2012 1 would like to see it stay!!!! Matt Wales San Jose CA 95132 United States 9/29/2012 The mountain will never be the same or historic without the building. No Brainer! 14 of 16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEW Petitions.xlsz comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment The mountain has signified peace and safety to people in this valley throughout centuries, including the one immediately previous. Throughout my lifetime,the tower one the mountain has been an icon as well as a reference point.My parents explained why it was there, and later, I understood on my own the significance of its dismantling.The Ohlone name of the mountain on which it stands has always part of image of that high, beautiful, long inaccessible place.When the public can at last walk on those grounds,we should be able to see the tower that provided safety, as well as the mountain top that has always called people Loureen Giordano San Jose CA 95110 United States 9/30/2012 to look up. Hans and Diane Ernst Los Gatos CA 95032 United States 9/30/2012 monument like others on mountaintops in Europe. It enhances the sight. Sharon Fiekowsky Los Altos CA 94024 United States 9/30/2012 Historical preservation Neal Weinstein San Jose CA 95120 United States 9/30/2012 1 do extensive hiking&the tower is like beacon that can be seen all over the bay area. Because there few, if any, of these reminders of the role of the USAF in the"Cold War." Please consider maintaining this entire site. Donations would probably be available to preserve it. Thank you. Joseph Hennequin Boise ID 83709 United States 10/1/2012 1 think, in addition to all the park/visitor center type stuff,there is a certain reverence to the William Storck San Jose CA 95130 United States 10/1/2012 place(been there many times).Would you bulldoze the Battle Field at Fredericksburg? The tower is historical and an important local landmark. Marin Headlands integrates Cathy Baird San Carlos CA 94070 United States 10/1/2012 batteries; Mt. Um can integrate cold war history with open space. I've always seen the box from down in the valley,and I've always wanted to go to see it in Dan Summers San Jose CA 95118 United States 10/2/2012 person(legally, of course) Mt. Umunhum represents a piece of San Jose history and visually, it is a striking city landmark that distinguishes our city from others. Mount Umunhum also reminds us of a time when there was potential turmoil that could've arrived to San Jose but luckily never did,and Rachel Ramirez San Jose CA 95125 United States 10/2/2012 by moving forward, it always help to look backward. jamy tays brentwood CA 94513 United States 10/3/2012 my uncle requested it. SALVADORE SERIO SAN DOSE CA 95118 United States 10/3/2012 1 FELT SAFE AS A CHILD KNOWING THAT WAS UP THERE Julie Anne San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/4/2012 The"box"is a symbol of home to anyone who lives in Almaden! It is an important historical and locational landmark for the South Bay region.Without the joshy varghese san jose CA 95119 United States 10/4/2012 tower,the peak will just be another"lump"in a series of mountain lumps Carmen Sanders San Jose CA 95130 United States 10/4/2012 It is History...military history 15 of 16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 2012.10.10.UmunhumNEWPetitions.xlsx comments COMMENTS 124 Name City State Zip Country SignedOn Comment David Hicks Sunnyvale CA 94085 United States 10/5/2012 It Is a South Bay landmark and part of the area's history. It has always been a staple landmark of the south bay. I grew up with it being ever present Andy Hamilton San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/6/2012 and it has been a point of conversation, myth, and legend throughout my life. It's a historical piece of history that you can see for a long ways.And when someone asks Aaron Andrade San Jose CA 95136 United States 10/6/2012 what it is you can tell them and remind them what we went thru Julian Gomez Palo Alto CA 94303 United States 10/6/2012 My country's history. Vladimir Gorshkov San Jose CA 95120 United States 10/7/2012 the tower resemblesAlmaden and adds a sense of pride and history Its a Bay Area landmark,a historical building, and should be made into an observation tower Scott Lesch San Jose CA 95112 United States 10/7/2012 and interpretive center. I was born here in 1943 and over the years watched as orchards,Victorian homes,canneries and other irreplaceable things were torn down. Michael Bena San Jose CA 95136 United States 10/8/2012 Please save this monument! Sharon Nienhaus Ca. CA I've lost respe United States 10/9/2012 It's the valley's landmark. 16 of 16 printed: 10/12/2012, 12:56 PM 1