Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPCP 2022-02-23COL F A D ') Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday February 23, 2022 6:30 PM- 9:00 PM NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnI7d- kk0j 1 cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Information https://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting ID:259 040 8013 Phone 1-346-248-7799 1. Roll Call 2. Approval Of Agenda 3. Consent Agenda a. PCM 2022-01-26 Documents: PCM 2022-01-26.Pdf 4. Public Hearing And Possible Action a. Public Hearing Final Plan Amendment 2 And Final Plats Filing 1, 2, 3 Alpenglow At Grand Park Documents: Alpenglow Planner Briefing 2-16-22.Pdf 2005-012709 Grand Park PDD.pdf FPDP_2W - ALPENGLOW FPDP.pdf Alpenglow PHASE 1- Final Plat.pdf Alpenglow PHASE 2 -Final Plat.pdf Alpenglow PHASE 3 -Final Plat.pdf WHITMER ALPENGLOW MEMO.pdf Russell Pennington Comments.pdf Merrick 2022.01.14- US 40 Sanitary Crossing-Comments.pdf Merrick Alpenglow At Grand Park Utility Review.pdf Merrick Alpenglow Drainage Review_2021-1216.Pdf Merrick Meyer Lot 2 - US Highway 40 Crossing Review.pdf Review Agency Comments.pdf Terracina Design Response Letter 12-22-21.Pdf Civil Plans_19008 GPWA CIVIL TKE Response Letter 2021-11-18.Pdf Additional Reports_2021.05.21-NWP-Verify WENCLS 200275601.Pdf Additional Reports_Willows 2W Trip Generation Letter030821.Pdf Additional Reports_HUD Environmental Assesment.pdf Additional Reports_Geotechnical Report.pdf ESTIMATED TIME SCHEDULE FOR DEVELOPMENT.pdf TB Resolution 2021-11-01 Approving Preliminary Plat And Final Plan Amendment 2 Willows.pdf Will Serve Letter.pdf PC Resolution 2022-02-01 Alpenglow At Grand Park Final Plat.pdf 5. Discussion And Possible Action Regarding 6. Other Business 7. Open Forum 8. Future Agenda Items 9. Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WED. MARCH 23, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION FRASER PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATE: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 MEETING: Planning Commission Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall and Virtual On -Line Meeting PRESENT Commission: Commissioners: Chair Jean Wolter, Vice Chair Katie Soles, Margaret Bowles, Parnell Quinn, Bob Gnuse and Sam Brewer. Staff: Town Planner, Catherine Trotter; Deputy Town Clerk Becky Allison; Town Manager Ed Cannon Others: Marian Waldron (on Zoom) Chair Jean Wolter called the meeting to order at 6:30pm. 1. Roll Call: Chair, Jean Wolter, Vice Chair Katie Soles, Margaret Bowles, Parnell Quinn, and Bob Gnuse (on Zoom). Sam Brewer joined by Zoom at 6:33pm (after the Agenda and Consent Agenda were approved). 2. Approval of Agenda: Commissioner Bowles moved, and Commissioner Soles seconded the motion to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 5-0. 3. Consent Agenda: a. Minutes October 27, 2021 Commissioner Soles moved, and Commissioner Bowles seconded the motion to approve the Minutes from October 27, 2021. Motion carried: 5-0. 4. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding: Waldron Minor Subdivision Town Planner Trotter presented information regarding the Minor Subdivision, Final Plat and Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the Town Board. A public hearing has been scheduled at Town Board on February 16, 2022. Marian Waldron is the current owner of Lot 4, Block 2, Byers Vista Subdivision, Reception # 93956. The property address is 401 Norgren Road. Marian Waldron is requesting approval of a minor subdivision final plat and a conditional use permit. The applicant is proposing to subdivide 401 Norgren Road into two lots. Lot 4A will be used for a future single family dwelling unit. Lot 4B has an existing single family dwelling unit. Page 2of3 Lot 4B meets the criteria for a stand-alone lot in the Low Density Multi -Family zoning district. The zoning district standards require a minimum lot area of 6000 SF for a single- family detached dwelling and 3000 SF per dwelling for a single-family attached or multiple -family dwelling and a minimum lot width of 50'. Lot 4B is 9213 SF with a lot width of 90.20'. Lot 4A has a minimum lot area of 4612 SF and a minimum lot width of +/- 44'. Lot 4A meets the provisions delineated below: Section 19-2-270 (d) of the Fraser Municipal Code allows that reduced lot size, width, setback and/or floor area for a residential dwelling may be permitted via a conditional use process in accordance with Section 19-2-120, entitled Conditional use permits, subject to the following provisions: 1. The minimum lot area may be reduced to two thousand five hundred (2,178) square feet, with a minimum lot width of twenty (20) feet, and a minimum side yard of five (5) feet. 2. The minimum floor area of the principal structure may be reduced to two hundred (200) feet. 3. No accessory dwelling unit (ADU) shall be allowed on the same lot. The proposed buildable area of Lot 4A is 2000 SF. The narrative suggests that the proposed single-family dwelling on Lot 4A will be 1496 SF with a 440 SF two -car garage, 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms and will be a 2 -story home. The proposed building footprint is 22' X 44' or approximately 968 SF. Building height is 35'. No ADU shall be allowed on Lot 4A per Code. Marian Waldron presented her ideas for the property. Because of their special or unusual characteristics, conditional uses require review and evaluation so that they may be located properly with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. Before acting on a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission and Board of Trustees shall consider certain factors in regard to the proposed use. The Planning Commission considered these factors per the Code and felt this proposal meet the criteria. Commissioner Soles motioned and Commissioner Gnuse seconded to approve Resolution 22-01-01. Motion carried 6-0. 5. Other Business: Commissioner Soles attended a meeting for big picture sustainable planning efforts for Fraser Valley. The Town needs to update their comprehensive plan, which was last done in 2010. Town Manager Cannon updated the Commission on the purchase of Victoria Village. The Town made an offer of $3,800,000, which was accepted by the sellers. Assistant Town Manager Michael Brack has submitted a grant which would cover 80 percent of the cost. The Town will know by February if they received the grant, with the grant money in hand by May. Page3of3 Town Manager Cannon briefed the Planning Commission on the acceptance of Grand Park Drive. Town Manager Cannon gave an overview of the deed restriction program. 6. Open Forum: Town Planner Trotter brought up another grant from Colorado Parks and Wildlife, which will be used to create a non -motorized trail on the west side of the Fraser River from the Lions Ponds to Rendezvous. The grant is for $250,000.00 and the Town will be notified in March if we are awarded the grant. 7. Future Agenda Items: Willows Apartments — Town Planner Trotter let the Commission know the Willows Apartments project has morphed into the Alpenglow project. It will be presented at the February 23, 2022 meeting. Trotter has also met with the new owners of the One Love property (315 Fraser Ave/416 Zerex). They have submitted a sketch plan with both commercial and residential land uses. 8. Adjourn: Commissioner Soles moved, and Commissioner Gnuse seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 7:35pm. Becky Allison, DeputyTown Clerk MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Chairperson Wolter and Planning Commissioners Catherine E. Trotter, AICP, Town Planner February 16, 2022 Planner Briefing on Alpenglow at Grand Park MATTER BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Final Plat and Final Plan — Amendment 2, Alpenglow at Grand Park, Planning Area 2W.1 and 2W.2 ACTION REQUESTED: The applicant, Grand Park Development, LLC., is requesting Final Plat and Final Plan — Amendment 2 approval of Alpenglow at Grand Park. BACKGROUND: This subdivision application is being processed as a Major Subdivision in accordance with Section 17-5-10 of the Fraser Municipal Code. The purpose of a major subdivision plat is to divide one (1) or more lots or parcels of land into a total of five (5) or more lots or five (5) or more dwelling units. Maps below indicates the general vicinity of this proposed development: Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Amendment 1 to the Final Plan deleted 3 lots. This amendment - Amendment 2, mainly includes Planning Area 2W.2 but also includes Planning Area 2W.1 because there was a lot line adjustment between lots 25 and 26. The development application is located within the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (PDD). A copy of the PDD is in the packet. This planning area is 2W and the PDD allows for an average density on 7.6 units per acre, 150 detached and 100 attached residential units, 278 lodging units and 30,000 square feet (SF) of commercial on 33.8 acres. This development application would create a total of 259 units on 33.8 acres which equates to an average density of 7.66 units/acre. 9 residential units are being transferred from 5W. The approved land use for Planning Area 5W is 70 detached residential units and 30 detached residential units. The Final Plan for Planning Area 5W approved 70 detached residential units. With this density transfer, a total of 79 units have been allocated, leaving 21 residential units left in Planning Area 5W. The Land Use and Development Notes on sheet 3 of 11 of the PDD state the following: Planning Area 2W comprises of 33.8 acres on an upland on the west side of Cozens Meadow. The area is adjacent to the railroad — served by the Old Victory Road and Grand Park trail system. This area has views of the Meadow and the Divide. A series of ponds and wetland related landscape may be utilized to transition to the pasture condition of the Meadow. The architecture will draw from traditional forms and materials of lodges and residential neighborhoods. The development standards for Planning Area 2W suggest a mixed -use land use, with a 75' height maximum, 0' front yard setback, 0' side yard setback, 0' rear yard setback and 10% open space requirement. There is also a 15' improvement and 20' building setback from Old Victory Road. This project was initially submitted as the following: a 204 unit for -rent multi -family residential community to be constructed in two phases near Old Victory Road and American Willow Drive. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Phase 1 includes 132 for -rent multi -family units and a clubhouse and Phase 2 includes 72 for - rent multi -family units. The applicant has switched gears and the revised narrative suggests the following: a 204 -unit multi -family residential condominium community planned to be constructed on 16 lots in three phases. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at the October 27, 2022, meeting. At that point in time, staff and legal counsel had several concerns regarding the application for The Willows Apartments. Concerns summarized below: 1. Improper Inclusion of 23W into Development Plan 2. Improper Inclusion of 2W.3 and 2W.4 into Development Plan 3. Lack of Commitment to Dedicate Right -of -Way 4. Lack of Commitment to Construct Sewer Crossing and Improvements Staff had recommended denial of the application; however, the following motion was made: Commissioner Bowles moved, and Commissioner Quinn seconded the motion to push the application up to the Town Board without any additional approval or denial. Motion carried: 3-1 Nay Brewer and Gnuse recused himself. The Town Board reviewed this application at the November 17, 2022, meeting. Several of the deficiencies had been resolved in a revised application and the Town Board approved the application via Resolution 2021-11-01 (included in packet). Terracina Design letter dated 12-22-21 addressed most of the conditions listed in the Town Board resolution, including outstanding outside review agency comments from the following entities: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Xcel Energy, and Mountain Parks Electric. Engineering review continues. Included in the packet are review comments from Public Works and Engineering comments from Merrick & Company related to drainage and utilities. The applicant is proposing the project be constructed on 16 lots in three phases. Alpenglow at Grand Park Filing No. 1 Final Plat: This filing is comprised of 6.2 acres to include lots 11-16 and Outlot A with a total of 72 residential units. Land use table has been added to plat. Under the General Note section on sheet 1 of 5, several of the blanks can be filled in with reception numbers, etc. Alpenglow at Grand Park Filing No. 2 Final Plat: This filing is comprised of 4.5 acres to include lots 6-9 with a total of 60 residential units. Under the General Note section on sheet 1 of 5, several of the blanks can be filled in with reception numbers, etc. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Alpenglow at Grand Park Filing No. 3 Final Plat: This filing is comprised of 6.1 acres to include lots 1-5 with a total of 72 residential units. Under the General Note section on sheet 1 of 5, several of the blanks can be filled in with reception numbers, etc. FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2: There is no sheet 12. On sheet 4, site data chart, under future residential land use, delete 66 and reference to allowed density transfer. Section 4.2 of the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement states that “Densities may be transferred between Planning Area up to 30% of the receiving area if sufficient roadway capacity and water and sewer capacity is available.” This will be determined in the future. OTHER: A letter from US Army Corps of Engineers has been provided approving the realignment of Cozens Ditch. Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment ( A l l d e a d - e n d s t r e e t s r e q u i r e t u r n a r o u n d s o r c u l - d e - s a c s p e r A t t a c h m e n t A - 1 2 - C u l - D e - S a c a n d T u r n a r o u n d s f o r S t r e e t s . A l l t u r n a r o u n d s s h a l l p r o v i d e t e n ( 1 0 ) f e e t o f l e v e l , t r e e l e s s g r o u n d a r o u n d t h e p e r i m e t e r . S p e c i a l a t t e n t i o n s h o u l d b e g i v e n t o p r o v i d e a d e q u a t e f u n c t i o n a l s n o w s t o r a g e a n d s i g h t d i s t a n c e . A l l t u r n a r o u n d s s h a l l b e s i g n e d " E m e r g e n c y T u r n A r o u n d , N o P a r k i n g A n y t i m e . " ) . PARKING: https://library.municode.com/co/fraser/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=CH19LADECO_ART4DE ST_DIV2PAST_S19-4-230PASPRE Link to Parking space requirements. It appears the applicant has met the parking requirements. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Staff has provided the following materials in the packet: Planner Briefing (THIS MEMO) Draft PC Resolution 2022-02-01 Public Works & Engineering Comments Whitmer Law Firm review memo Grand Park PDD The applicant has provided the following materials in the packet: Final Plats Final Plan Amendment 2 Project Narrative Terracina response letter Civil TKE response letter 2W Trip Generation Letter USACE Correspondence HUD Environmental Assessment Geotech Report Will serve letter Estimated time schedule for development The applicant has also provided the following materials that are not in the packet: Density chart- not approved by Town of Fraser Civil Plans and Reports Drainage Report Neighbor list HOA Declarations Title Commitment SIA Exterior Lighting Specs 2004 Rendezvous TIA RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of this application with the following conditions: 1.Developer must agree to provide a dedicated right-of way for and construct the remaining portion of Old Victory Road as part of the subdivision improvements for this project and must be included in the SIA in conjunction with the first recorded plat. 2.Developer must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Alpenglow project, as well as future development. The proposed Alpenglow project will exceed the capacity of the current system. Construction of these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA in conjunction with the first plat recorded. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com 3 . Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment ( A l l d e a d - e n d s t r e e t s r e q u i r e t u r n a r o u n d s o r c u l - d e - s a c s p e r A t t a c h m e n t A - 1 2 - C u l - D e - S a c a n d T u r n a r o u n d s f o r S t r e e t s . A l l t u r n a r o u n d s s h a l l p r o v i d e t e n ( 1 0 ) f e e t o f l e v e l , t r e e l e s s g r o u n d a r o u n d t h e p e r i m e t e r . S p e c i a l a t t e n t i o n s h o u l d b e g i v e n t o p r o v i d e a d e q u a t e f u n c t i o n a l s n o w s t o r a g e a n d s i g h t d i s t a n c e . A l l t u r n a r o u n d s s h a l l b e s i g n e d " E m e r g e n c y T u r n A r o u n d , N o P a r k i n g A n y t i m e . " ) . 4.A d d r e s s r e v i e w c o m m e n t s p r o v i d e d b y P u b l i c W o r k s i n e m a i l d a t e d 1 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 a n d d r a i n a g e a n d u t i l i t y e n g i n e e r i n g c o m m e n t s p r o v i d e d b y M e r r i c k & C o m p a n y ( U S 4 0 S a n i t a r y C r o s s i n g c o m m e n t s 2 0 2 2 - 0 1 - 1 4 , C o n s t r u c t i o n P l a n s f o r M e y e r L o t 2 - U S 4 0 S a n i t a r y C r o s s i n g R e v i e w m e m o d a t e d 1 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 a n d A l p e n g l o w D r a i n a g e R e v i e w m e m o d a t e d 1 2 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 2 , a n d 1 0 0 % C o n s t r u c t i o n D o c u m e n t s d a t e d 1 2 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 2 ) a n d r e v i s e d o c u m e n t s a c c o r d i n g l y . 5.Under the General Note section on each final plat, fill in the blanks with reception numbers, etc. 6.There is no sheet 12 on the Final Plan – Amendment 2. 7.On sheet 4 of the Final Plan – Amendment 2, on the site data chart, under future residential land use, delete 66 and reference to allowed density transfer. 8.Address review comments provided by The Whitmer Law Firm in memo dated 2/17/2022 and revise documents accordingly. 9.Applicant must secure CDOT Utility Permit for US 40 sewer crossing prior to recording the first plat. 10.Applicant shall resubmit for review and approval all final plat and final plan documents. This development application shall be scheduled for Town Board review once these conditions has been addressed. See PC Resolution 2022-02-01. Please contact me with questions/concerns. ctrotter@town.fraser.co.us f~ GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO r; u i"~ u i~ 1 ry \;~j~: /1 \ I 2\ ~ i ' ---:.::;-) I \< ~\ I :,h-, (/ II;)! \\ \ "\ - ". \ (i-"', j/ It ./ c. / 215\!~ :1"'/' 14~' H!!.';" ((\"" 11' 13 j- 18 \\ i \, ',17 --'. ._ j- 16.:::, '1, I I 15 ~>#. /' 1/ Jj~,' ;:;( I\'\'"~ - "',0..; '\ ,~) _ --...... --: ,> '( 11 I" :'1 ' ~'~ ,. . ': L" \ .. ",I" , , '., , 'i .__-___..J "-,\) "\ Ir' :'1' .._~\~-" \ ,,:'j:\ ::": II \,'~ '.v'-" _ .,,-.) \ ',\ f j i 1'1' ,: t'" ..' 1,\--..-.\ 1'1 ',.\ \ Y' , 1'/ 1 / \; fi / " \ \ . \, /1 ~. ,. ------ I ~ ~ ------ \ ;11 ,: I' I';l-:S ',I i ' r ',I 'j_:'- _. _' 0<'. . '~' ___',_ ~~:. ":~ '\ , I, ~_ I r'.,"/ / '".< j" '" - .,:~: .J. L i I i /. '--------. I - .......v.. . I' \ " 'I \ O; C~~' I;~'i ,~:= \ ! / '; ,..... +':~-. ';~~ ~a~~;~i~~\ . ~ , ~. :'~+=::--+ pl;;~. -"~:~~. l.. -Ra~}~~\.<\~- Ji ' o,~~ I--- ,'II.~I.',.., ..>., .'~-.'.,,-./'-/,'[!.:~~,.A.:';%:r-\R:'':.:': ('.' \ \'-"-',) "'..... ./'". s;-:--','!.'....:.~~ I r' " ,- r-!.nn~ \ " '\.~.. i .~>- -v' l /:; ,_....:<;.?... I~ ':~'--p' ", .,,",' ...... : /. r=~":::..:.; --,: ( i--", , ' . v---. .: ,,,! if 1I ...... . ~. ..' ,I . ( ,1<"H~.~l":,,:,,,"'~ -:~'. I " ' ,,' I ' -./ \ 'I '~-----......' 23.... '.: I 24 ,~- ---.-----'"" --~~.:;'~~--~,~ "-', ',. 20 (- 21 "- \ ': / 22" l .',,- 22~, I" ..", ~ I ~/ , 6~" 19 ..~ \~, ~^ ': '-------,.../~., \',,---~ 1I ' , .. --.. . /' , . \. .......j-, . . , I\'~)I" .... j('"". \. .~/. ." " \. \S I "'''"'- U~~d ../ -7 i < J ~ ~ U> \~\ I C I I /q,~ ..... ~ \..,' ~ \ I .' ~I -y /.- i. I '-------.. ,''''~ ...... - ," 0 :-... ----------.., ".\ "\ ----...1 /r ... C""'''1'., " --- ;, I<~ \ /: ... ' J'.,:J/ ~ 'I' -./7 i~.,.) : / \ ) 1\ 1 ' 0 \ \ ~" ,",,~ l' . ..- _ - - ---J - -+- i/ : ,,\ ' f "....:/ ~~/ II ., ~'~ ')\ . Jl V ~ L:"~ - I)"~ I' '" :? ' r .. : ';""... \ I / .... ~.~ -:: 'Il",', ;., .,."--.., \ ", -------' :' / . ~~ 1-; I 1/ .;' / . - 1.1 'c..n'--~ 1 . , I" f' T ---.:liK~ liffisiiAiil 71 - -'.: ... .~-'" rr A ~! ...~.':..:. > ~". o (. I, \~~, ,~ I I \; / /~ I, ' " /.~~... '. "'. .-....MlIf):\.a1e '...~~~.,." ,,.,. " j"'L I <</ I . .' ol" l-" . J" ,"''' 0 ". I'" '\ "I"~" '''-,:'(.;- ,I I ~ \ ( I ~ I'V .... . ,,\ -: " ~'.. \ \\ '- \ "-- J::.'.. i..i..............~,,!.~--;'",,'\ '_'X/~~ "'.2,.-------.,,- 30 . / . \. ! J~ 1/ '\ 28,\ i I! ,:,:-: 27 -.., .... '-., I / / \ \ ;::, t 0 I ...., I ",.- . ,____ \ ~ .- ; \ . ' '\ I 5: I \. \ \ ~:/ I " ) ,/ --,./ ~ (I \ (I ',.. \ ~" h, .. '. ,:" , ! . I , j/. i ')'" ' . . . , ,~ " ~ ,,'., ","':'--' .. ..' 11 ., ',,' .i /07 :JI "''Ib'' i le::::;\ '. , ;' . " \. :i < ".'. " '-"'(c'," , ", i: '. \ ", I,' I // . (I I I ~ ~ / -" : -'- ~ "." '-. \. Ii" \ I' l' : / / :~': I I: I ': If. ,.. J " - .... \ '\ '--------' ( : '~.. n 1/ I : a j / :, ,,\ I <> _i! ': '. \ \"\ (' , '" , ,0...., y '>ll",",', I 'I I __. . I, . Ii ...~ iJ \ Y /' J"----/ / I. r) / '; GRAND. PJ\RK i " ;." /:.\ . : " 1 ,.' ,,\ 7 "~ I L.f.__, Y/ \ /' / i ':, I '.: i!:' '"' I i ';\ ! ~ fOWN"OF / / i\ I . i 1- - tl' i, r. "', "^" I'~\{Eg": 1...- :,~ l_< ,".f, \, 1/. _- ; .' I " '!IV I't{, . P kr' \ 1',,1 J I] .'. j /' /------ \ / i' '\ ~-- "-...... I'" I .: ( .----"/ ~. /~:A'\:~":' ( wa\ ar . t.,:~ -- -~ - /. / /;;:;;.~ '. '-./ ,: 1 -----/ ./ I 1 / \ - -~ I I' \ /....-------- ,. ':,:~".Ii.f:. :f"\N:: f-- # o' I' /' i ~~, I.' "c.m ...' 34 ~\-J \ 35 ____-' i /./ 36 l" (~. 1\ '. 1, _/ ;.} . ___ P~g/ \,~.; /., . 33 i.\-" \ / . '] / r 3~ /"'w~ /f~~u_ 1 / \ ..., \:'1 'X) . ..\ (, /, ',- !! '1" .J;( "l\. to, I /, I ), ' I I . ' . .. 1.'" f I '.' . \ ~ I / ,'" ' ) " I / ': !, : il '\ i I~' . '~J I' I' ------, '. \' --:,.' I .:; '~ 1 /' 1-. .. a<..,----t------- ( .. \ Ii: 0('.... l ..(..... ",..., ..., -----, ....". ~.--.>...", '------, 1, /i \ I~' ./ I' ",' J" ...' )) ," ...~ \ '., """ --- I '-'-. '\ -C1~!:---1 r .-' I "..~, __---/ 1"'-- 1 ,'.~ :=1>:: ---.." ,.,~\ (~/,,~,'---\ 1" '(I)~ ',' \1-""J;;' ~~~Z.:.-~.~ l; ~ ( . '~'t~> .::::::::-'~' ~.~ I' 1 '/ I"~ ----------:...)..::'.: '~/l"" I' . - \:~ i, ~ J______" ~'." I..!!-'; J'-.- ')-;,'" ,~....._~ ,,'- I --- ~ .. '. ". I . U."'" ., '" I'" , / I . -- c' (7' i \'--' '-1, ~ o' --..... -~ . / # . L...:;-:-, I ,_________/.~ -', r --1,'/ ---------- . I. ("",' ~~ 6" ________ ,I' I - J ..,r I! 1'~74~ 1 !>J"~ - 1 ( : I 'f \+- - _ 1__ . I I nlRW lIOLJ"lIAl}t; -:--"-, -:/- _.-........- m II $. '-. + A // -- _ . I ' ( / ~, ' ...... 'l>' I ' ---- ~ \i'\-..." \ ) .#.--/ - ." '~.....-----" ) F' ___ I : 1 I J' ~;/ -- --. 2: I \ .J, , " 1I \ .~ , ... . / ,.,./ , <I' ... ,/) I " ; \,' __________, /: \.:' . , 0 , " C:::::J 'h I0 . 'I I ': y . . , , '\ \ \ \.;;' ~/ i;/' ~/ 1\ ' j'---' I " : I / f} 1:;1 r---------- ).\,,-,'---:-' \, :!~ >I~I/>"--.' ,,(~./' ~ \! i' I,' .^,"\' , \', ,., ,u.,\'"'\ ", ..... J:~: ( l( ~// ,-,>' i-'.,.:. ':, \' =; (( ~ I: (~.:;) \.\ \(,/ ('"f '\ - J '\"'\ \ /'] .~'...;,)/:<;:--,' ./!', ",;;-/ /<\'-~"'\ i ,.-)/ ~'ut / :(.---\;.r () a..~\~,,:&.~.\~ "--)\.~. "'-" ~ 1 /' I -,...".,:.::./ "--:::.:---.- .., ,\ 'v' ," l' \'" /;~ I;) 1;\ I \.. \." \,', ~;.~, -___... ~.c-.:;:'i"~l..--::::- o"l.'" _______________~. '..""...vlJ" " II I I, .' .~ \; \ " \', ~ ~ "-'-.. .. \ .~"-: / j. "",.' ',/. /', '.' 11/ . --- ;0. , 0" )" '. '" '----4"""''''' ./. /' 1\ ,_\~.,.~~' '''1'''/ / ~ '-- --....... '.~., (/ ,./.# \!/: ~\~: / "Cl~)-~'#~.:' ...., -!..P~~"" z:".~''- /. ~.\ .l' ..;,.~$/ ~ \" ' .. <i' "'.?/: =1; I ^' ..,,~:.t'~' ;:-.. \..r-------;, -----..,; I ~ r --'-../ ",' l,.. l: 1'.; . 0 ~/. : ''-'. r ,'. ....<",r ~ ~~ ( .. dol::,""\ \ I ''.\ \ I ./ ~. I ~.~.':-':- ~ - :', f .:_....~. '" '... '~"'-' ..c~,; \ ,\ ~ -i", I ::: ~ ~", \ . ~ u... / i lJ5"i .O'~..~. { rr.., ,. I '----\ ~':t~-'" ._~ ""~., ~.. 't~ w..,;';; ~.~.I ..... '-- "~ ,. t--"=; 1 \ /~ ..," ;!, ?' >--\ , ".:~,.:,:"""",S"', .~ I ,\-..,\ I h ,. .--~.,---- '. 1 ._"~'r> ~ 1",1' / - --------" ,.p"". ..".~\ "..:--.. I ~ I ( I 1 ..'j,-.--.......-,..\ / J, ;.,...~, 0 " ,,:., ------ \ /" ,4r'JOl>J ~."':r""'~-" ~,..."l> . I '\ I , \ "'~'-'", ro" ..... b \ ,,': (' ----- /.~;'Cf ..... I \' ':., '. Q : .." II '-.' " p - --- ':',i \ /" 7. " I.' ....-- m", "'::~L'X-' \I"~~C' I ' \ \ --- I' , . I .,... I' 'v. ;:<-- $' I iUJJ~ j' I! . ~., .,~ ~ 1 . V '----... f\ j~ ) r /,/.to 'Il '-------........ ' , I'-".I~:~-~:'/ ~{.. ". t\"~~ .---/ ' 1'/l.T I IJ _J\ " ji~~'~>~~\\. Wu'!'" .,./ // G 0.... ----.\ J,' ) ,/' _ ....!.-~ ! "2< I -.-~"..~'_<)" / .~. /';r " I :.....-;- :.;'~~" ~.~.~. "'~0-.PUf{ VICINITY MAP 0 1500 3000 6000 VEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: Certifica I a surveyor insuring the accuracy of the survey and plan and certifying that he complied with tli uirements of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, Title 38, Article d the requirements of these r tions in the preparation of the plan, to be in subs a Iy the following form: I, , a duly registered land s or in the State of rado, do hereby certify that this plan of Grand Park truly and correctly represe e s of a survey made by me or under my direction, and that said plan complies with the Ire s of Title 38, Article 51, Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, and that the monume quired by said Sta and by the Town of Fraser Subdivision Regulations have been place e ground. CERTIFICATE FOR APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING CO'MMISSION: The Planning ComgJission of the Town of Fraser, Colorado does hereby authorize and approve this plan. Approved thisXday of NOV1V1l3gR'> <iLcJ05. ulson, Planning Commission Chairperson CERTIFICATE FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOWN BOARD: Approved and all public dedications accepted this r-J"''day of NWEM8.EJ<..:1;'yihe Fraser Town Board. The Town of Fraser does not assume any responsibility for the correctness or accuracy of any information disclosed on this plan nor any representations or information presented to tile Town of Fraser which induced the Town to give this certificate. BY: .2J.':5-.<::1J\ M Fran Cook, Mayor, Town of Fraser i: t; i: t:: U c;; NORTH SCALE: 1"=3000'.0" i: l' . SHEET INDEX COVER SHEET 1 OF 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 OF 11 LAND USE & 3 OF 11. DEVELOPMENT NOTES SITE ANALYSIS 4 OF 11 PLANNING AREA COMPARISON 5 OF 11 LAND USE PLAN 6 OF 11 PRELIMINARY 7 OF 11 SEWER PLAN PRELIMINARY 8 OF 11 WATER PLAN PRELIMINARY 9 OF 11 GRADING PLAN CONCEPTUAL 10 OF 11 DRAINAGE PLAN MASTER ROADWAY PLAN 11 OF 11 d.OOS-~I~'O~ STATE OF COLORADO } SSCountyofGRAND Filed % fecord this ~ day of ~1r~lJ~5 at 4',1'1 tj o'clock_M. Recorded in Book Page_ Deputy OWNER Comerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC 47 Cooper Creek Way Suite 321A Winter Park, CO 80482 970)726-8600 PLANNER Gage Davis Associates 475 W 12th Avenue Suite E Denver, Colorado 80204 303) 893-4288 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Carroll and Lange 46 Cooper Creek Way Suite 328 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 970) 726-8100 Fees sJLI ~ AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN COVER SHEET DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 SHEET 1 OF 11 DEDICATION AND NOTARY CLAUSE:GRAND PARK 2. THENCE SOUTH 65'12'18" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 297.56 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE; 3. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03'38'10", A RADIUS OF 2794.80 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 177.37 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 61'12'08" EAST; 15. THENCE SOUTH 52'49'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 77.31 FEET TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 16. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 175.92 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 55'22'51" WEST A DISTANCE OF 175.79 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 17. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 131'31'00", A RADIUS OF 616.03 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 1414.05 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 53'55'00" WEST TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 1. THENCE SOUTH 00'34'43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 274.97 FEET~O THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; 2. THENCE NORTH 89'47'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 197.45 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAilROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF.WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING TWENTY-TWO (22) COURSES: 1. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 127"33'14", A RADIUS OF 816.03 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 1816.69 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 55'53'53" EAST TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 2. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 55'32'08" EAST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET; 3. THENCE NORTH 52'49'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 77.31 FEET TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 4. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 175.92 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 55'22'51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 175.79 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 5. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80'35'20", A RADIUS OF 616.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 867.53 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 79'22'50" EAST TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLANj o l KNOW All MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT CORNERSTONE WINTER PARK HOLDINGS llC, JEFFREY R. JOHNS, FRANK J. JOHNS II, WilLIAM A. JOHNS, DAVID M. JOHNS, CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH JOHNS, PHILIP ALAN JOHNS AND CATHERINE ELAINE HAZLlTT ARE THE OWNERS OF THE REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE TOWN OF FRASER, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO, MORE FUllY DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: 9. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23'11'00", A RADIUS OF 2764.93 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 1118.76 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 45'40'40" WEST TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 10. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 235.64 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 32'29'48" WEST A DISTANCE OF 235.62 FEET; GRAND PARK - NORTH PARCEL: 11. THENCE NORTH 31'35'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 476.10 FEET TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 12. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 34'17'48" WEST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 13. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 80'35'20", A RADIUS OF 816.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 1148.83 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 79'22'50" WEST TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 14. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 55'32'08" WEST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET; A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADOPARTSOFSECTIONS20, 28, AND 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONSIDERING THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 TO BEAR NORTH 89'47'06" EAST WITH All BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE NORTH 89'47'06" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1316.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE NORTH 89'47'06" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 472.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 40; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOllOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES: THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT "A" THE FOllOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTId 74'12'26" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 179.91 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 15'39'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 506.94 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 18'59'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 27.08 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KING'S CROSSING ROAD, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 96007615 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOllOWING TEN (10) COURSES: 1. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON.TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30'07'57", A RADIUS OF 167.31 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 87.99 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 63'58'11" WEST; 2. THENCE SOUTH 86'20'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.25 FEET; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED UNDER RECEPTION NO. 95004884 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: . 9. THENCE SOUTH 31'35'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 269.65 FEET TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 10. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 244.37 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 32'30'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF 244.35 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 11. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23'11'00", A RADIUS OF 2964.93 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 1199.69 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 45'40'40" EAST TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 12. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 69.78 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 57"50'51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 69.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 13. THENCE SOUTH 00'31'17" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 14.78 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 14. THENCE NORTH 89'50'34" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 23.94 FEET TO A POINT ON A SPIRAL CURVE; 15. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A NON-TANGENT 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 148.38 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 59'22'36" EAST A DISTANCE OF 146.37 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 44'39'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 63.95 FEET; 7. THENCE SOUTH 51'11'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 55.49 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 43'50'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 604.08 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 30'10'40" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 671.02 FEET; 10. THENCE NORTH 89'48'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 92.16 FEET; 11. THENCE SOUTH 19'14'13" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 80.30 FEET; 12. THENCE SOUTH 06'02'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 394.74 FEET; 13. THENCE SOUTH 03'36'42" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 437.81 FEET; 14. THENCE SOUTH 17'18'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 157.29 FEET; 15. THENCE SOUTH 20'07'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 274.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID lELAND CREEK SUBDIVISION, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF lELAND CREEK; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF lELAND CREEK THE FOllOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES: 1. THENCE SOUTH 20'07'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 226.86 FEET; j, o r: g: o 5J 4. THENCE SOUTH 57"10'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.65 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 57"35'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 255.30 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 57"07'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1432.95 FEET; 7. THENCE SOUTH 56'31'19" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 348.65 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 8. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15'43'30", A RADIUS OF 1366.40 FEET, AND AN ARC lENGTH OF 375.01 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 40'47'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1958.86 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 10. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22'49'33", A RADIUS OF 2798.79 FEET, AND AN ARC lENGTH OF 1114.99 FEET; 11. THENCE SOUTH 18'01'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 486.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT "A", REGIS-MARYVAlE, INC. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 280227 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; 18. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 175.92 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 16'47'09" EAST A DISTANCE OF 175.79 FEET; 19. THENCE NORTH 19'20'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 139.30 FEET TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 20. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 16'37'52" EAST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 21. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 78'42'00", A RADIUS OF 816.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 1121.91 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 27'30'30" WEST TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 22. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC LENGTH OF 112.35 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 70'00'51" WEST A DISTANCE OF 112.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE NORTH 00'06'44" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 135.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID PARCEL CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 12,972,836 SQUARE FEET OR 297.82 ACRES, MORE OR lESS. 6. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 97.85 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 35'43'11" EAST A DISTANCE OF 97.81 FEETTO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 7. THENCE SOUTH 00'28'15" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 241.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 8. THENCE SOUTH 89'54'21" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 147.71 FEET; 1. THENCE SOUTH 66'36'51" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 423.42 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 25'22'56" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 432.01 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 70'17'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 525.61 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 87'10'33" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.53 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 87"10'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 95.38 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 87'14'57" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 205.49 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE; 7. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09'34'18", A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 28.40 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 78'46'18" WEST TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; SAID EXCEPTION PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 217,802 SQUARE FEET OR 5.00 ACRES, MORE OR lESS. SAID WEST MOUNTAIN - NORTH PARCEL CONTAINS A NET AREA OF 12,755,034 SQUARE FEET OR 292.82 ACRES, MORE OR lESS, AFTER EXCEPTION. 16. THENCE SOUTH 59'48'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 217.82 FEET TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 17. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 175.91 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 57"12'49" EAST A DISTANCE OF 175.79 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 18. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRALANGlE OF 36'53'00", A RADIUS OF 616.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 397.04 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 33'49'40" EAST TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 19. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 175.92 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 10'26'31" EAST A DISTANCE OF 175.79 FEET; 20. THENCE SOUTH 07"53'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 102.74 FEET TO A POINT OF spiral CURVATURE; 21. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 10'35'48" EAST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 4. THENCE SOUTH 47'49'46" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 390.04 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 69'00'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 953.80 FEET; 6. THENCE SOUTH 27"44'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 424.85 FEET; 7. THENCE SOUTH 00'32'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 503.48 FEET; 8. THENCE SOUTH 04'06'12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 260.82 FEET; 9. THENCE SOUTH 27"57'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 390.36 FEET; 10. THENCE SOUTH 49'32'25" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1167.38 FEET; 11. THENCE SOUTH 39'16'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.62 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTH 01 '27'35" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 38.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE SOUTH 89'09'28" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, A DISTANCE OF 2658.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID PARCEL CONTAINS AN AREA OF 44,347,263 SQUARE FEET OR 1018.07 ACRES, MORE OR lES 0' 3. THENCE SOUTH 89'01'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 129.25 FEET; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 AND CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 TO BEAR SOUTH 00'16'02" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 00'16'02" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 582.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89'43'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 333.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'16'02" EAST, PARAllEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 652.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 333.77 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE NORTH 00'16'02" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 652.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; GRAND PARK - SOUTH PARCEL: 22. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'32'02", A RADIUS OF 816.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 278.46 FEET AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 25'09'11" EAST TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF lELAND CREEK; THENCE SOUTH 04'29'43" WEST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 9.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OLD KING ROAD, RECORDED IN FilE NO. 0080 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES OF SAID OLD KING ROAD THE FOllOWING ELEVEN (11) COURSES: By: C. Clark Lipsco Vice President o g: o l 8. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26'15'28", A RADIUS OF 328.18 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 150.40 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 60'51'25" WEST TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 9. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71 '49'08", A RADIUS OF 226.49 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 283.90 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 83'38'15" WEST TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; State of Colorado ) ss. County of GrIA ,,~) 10. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16'18'47", A RADIUS OF 830.30 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 236.40 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 52'17'48" WEST TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28; THENCE NORTH 00'11'18" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 44.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF KING'S CROSSING SOLAR TOWNHOMES, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 177402 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID KING'S CROSSING SOLAR TOWNHOMES THE FOllOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: 1. THENCE NORTH 00'17'11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 28, A DISTANCE OF 314.75 FEET; 2. THENCE SOUTH 89'40'36" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 180.15 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 02'36'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 145.06 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 51'23'03" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 101.44 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAilROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOllOWING TWENTY-TWO (22) COURSES: 1. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'23'06". A RADIUS OF 616.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 219.44 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 25'34'43" WEST TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; PARTS OF SECTIONS 29, 30, 31, AND 32, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOllOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 AND CONSIDERING THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31 TO BEAR NORTH 00'55'33" WEST WITH All BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE NORTH 00'55'33" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2648.34 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTH 00'56'49" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31, A DISTANCE OF 1319.87 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; 1. THENCE NORTH 61'02'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 127.21 FEET; The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ;) I day of (j~+. ,2005, by C. Clark Lipscomb as Vice President on behalf of Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings LLC, a Colorado limited Iiablilty company. WITNESS my hand and official seal 2. THENCE NORTH 87'01'11" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 88.64 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 44'28'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 232.36 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 59'28'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 167.84 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 67'54'49" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 211.19 FEET; Notary blic My commission expires:q hi J,~ r""':""'::<"~"'-::'-:I q r\i~ARY !(p-.Y vVRAY ~ NOTARY PUBLIC g LSTATE OF ~_?.;9R~.2J M, Commission Expires 04/11/2006 2. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 175.92 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 10'26'31" WEST A DISTANCE OF 175.79 FEET; 3. THENCE NORTH 07'53'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 102.74 FEET TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 4. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 10'35'48" WEST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 5. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36'53'00", A RADIUS OF 816.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 525.79 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 33'49'40" WEST TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; THENCE NORTH 00'30'43" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31,A DISTANCE OF 448.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43'49'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1216.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTH 89'37'47" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 450.42 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTH 00'42'52" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, A DISTANCE OF 1317.99 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE NORTH 00'42'56" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, A DISTANCE OF 544.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'41'52" EAST, ALONG A LINE BEING 544.20 FEET NORTHERLY DISTANT, WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARAllEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, A DISTANCE OF 1307.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OFTHE NORTHEAST QUARTER OFTHE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE NORTH 00'29'16" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 771.09 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE NORTH 00'34'39" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, A DISTANCE OF 2634.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE NORTH 89'44'12" EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, A DISTANCE OF 21.27 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED UNDER RECEPTION NO. 98003968 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL THE FOllOWING TWO (2) COURSES: 6. THENCE SOUTH 22'05'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; 7. THENCE NORTH 67'54'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 215.61 FEET; 8. THENCE NORTH 59'28'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 180.16 FEET; 9. THENCE NORTH 44'28'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 213.24 FEET; c Frank Johns, also own as Frank J. Johns II, individually and as attorney-in-fact for Jeffrey R. Johns, William A Johns, David M. Johns, Christopher Joseph Johns, Philip Alan Johns and Catherine Elaine Hazlitt10. THENCE SOUTH 87'01'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 47.76 FEET; i, o g: I 11. THENCE SOUTH 61'02'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 115.44 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF FOREST TRAil ROAD, AS DEDICATED IN BOOK 222 AT PAGE 248 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOllOWING TWO (2) COURSES: 1. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'27'01", A RADIUS OF 876.78 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 312.95 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 47'29'39" EAST TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; 2. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'04'49", A RADIUS OF 962.17 FEET AND AN ARC lENGTH OF 1.35 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 308 AT PAGE 657 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY AND ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'24'17", A RADIUS OF 140.70 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 3.45 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS SOUTH 11'08'28" WEST TO A POINT ON A CURVE ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF lELAND CREEK SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2004-0123316 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID lELAND CREEK SUBDIVISION THE FOllOWING FIFTEEN (15) COURSES: State of Colorado ss.a~os -0 ,~,oqCountyofbC'&~ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this l' day of October, 2005, by Frank Johns, also kni1wn.~ ..0 Frank J. Johns II, individually and as attorney-in-fact ft!r'JelfTey R. Johns, William A Johns, David M. Johns, Christopher Joseph Johns, Philip Alan Johns and Catherine Elaine Hazlitt. WITNESS my hand and official seal 6. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT OUTSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 202.10 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 57'03'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 201.94 FEET; 7. THENCE NORTH 59'46'10" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 217.82 FEET TO A POINT OF SPIRAL CURVATURE; 8. THENCE ALONG THE ARCS OF A 100 FOOT INSIDE OFFSET TO A SEARLES SPIRAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A COMBINED ARC lENGTH OF 235.64 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 58'51'32" WEST A DISTANCE OF 235.62 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 1. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18'15'50", A RADIUS OF 880.00 FEET, AN ARC lENGTH OF 280.51 FEET, AND A CHORD THAT BEARS NORTH 48'45'23" WEST TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; 2. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE lEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10'53'46", A RADIUS OF 190.00 FEET AND AN ARC lENGTH OF 36.13 FEET; 3. THENCE SOUTH 34'27'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 73.50 FEET; 4. THENCE SOUTH 53'30'56" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 82.14 FEET; 5. THENCE SOUTH 32'40'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 61.16 FEET; r~~'-f~lAR~~-'J~P..\/WRAy-~'"i1jNOTARYPUBLICh STATE OF COLOR~OJ r,l, Commission Expires 04/11/2006 Fees s-!11 ,--- AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET 2 OF 11 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT NOTES 1. 0- ci 2. Land Use and Development Guidelines Land use and development standards have been identified as a planning guide based on the Grand Park POD and the type, location, and extent of its land use as indicated in the plan. Planning Area 1Wb Planning Area lWb is approximately 5.9 acres located south ofthe Old Victory Road, abutting the Town of Winter Park and Kings Crossing Rd. The planning and architecture will draw from alpine ranch and townscape themes compatible with lWa. Open Space Designated open space consists of areas like the portions of the Cozens and Elk Creek meadows; Leland Creek and other appropriate open space. Additional open space is required within each planning area (see Development Standards). Minimize development disturbance and maintain hydrologic performance of the east and west fork of Elk Creek. Planning Area 2W Planning Area 2W comprises 33.8 acres on an upland on the west side of Cozens Meadow. The area is adjacent the railroad - served by the Old Victory Road and Grand Park trail system. This area has views of the Meadow and the Divide. A series of ponds and wetland related landscape may be utilized to transition to the pasture condition of the Meadow. The architecture will draw from traditional forms and materials of lodges and residential neighborhoods.3. Trails A designated public trail system, serving community and regional linkages will be provided. Trail construction will follow a least disturbance principle and be improved to serve the particular user(s). Private trails may be provided in some areas. Easements for the designated public trail system will be dedicated to the Town of Fraser for public use and maintenance. Planning Area 3Wa 3Wa includes approximately 8.2 acres in a wooded peninsula bounded by the railroad, Elk Creek, a 5-acre in-holding parcel zoned Accommodations and the Old Victory Road on the east. Site considerations for cluster housing on this knoll should include the Elk Creek drainage and buffering the railroad. 4. Wildlife Conservation Man-made impacts on wildlife will be minimized: appropriate fence design and control of domestic animals are required. Planning Area 3Wb Approximately 11.8 acres, 3Wb is located on the edge of the meadow adjacent the Old Victory Road. Site considerations for housing will include its relationship to the Cozens Meadow, views and the Old Victory Road. 5. Public Facilities Maintenance Parcels Planning Area 6w (4 acres) will be deeded to the Town of Fraser for the public purpose of a maintenance facility. One satellite storage facility of approximately one-third (.3) acre will also be deeded to the Town of Fraser for roadway maintenance needs in Grand Park. Planning Area 3Wc Planning Area 3Wc, approximately 12 acres, is located between US 40, the Old Victory Road and the Cozens Meadow. This mixed-use area will draw on some of the same themes of Planning Area 1 Wa with pedestrian linkages and accessible parking. Recreation Site Five (5) acres will be deeded to the Town of Fraser for public purpose community recreation and/or open space. Planning Area 4W 4W is approximately 11.2 acres situated along the Old Victory Road, south of the Fraser Valley Center, adjacent the 5-acre in holding parcel and adjoining the Elk Creek meadow. Planned for commercial site planning considerations include its relationship to the Old Victory Road. l: u 6. Attainable Housing A broad range of housing for Fraser Valley employee's equivalent to 144 dwelling units will be provided over the development period of the project, pursuant to the approved Cornerstone Attainable Housing Plan.Planning Area 5W This planning area consists of 17.1 acres between the Union Pacific Railroad and Elk Creek Meadow. Site planning considerations for this residential neighborhood will include its relationship to the Elk Creek Meadow, buffering the railroad and the commercial planned in 4W 7. Density Transfer Increasing and decreasing land use densities within and between Grand Park and East Mountain Planning Areas is allowed in the Rendezvous PDD. Density may be transferred to a reserve with a transfer application. Density may be transferred to a Planning Area up . to 30% of the density of the receiving Planning Area, without the requirement of a plan amendment, if sufficient roadway, water and sewer capacity are available. Transfer exceeding 30% of the density of the receiving area and/or a change of use may occur with a major plan amendment for the affected planning areas. Planning Area 6W 6W is approximately 4.0 acres located betWeen County Road 72, the Fraser Cemetery, and the Union Pacific Railroad; adjacent a secondary entrance to Grand Park. This parcel is to be deeded to the Town of Fraser for the public purpose of a maintenance facility. Site planning considerations include buffering the Fraser Cemetery, the project entrance and Co. Rd. 72. 8. Golf Course The golf course shall meet the criteria of the Audubon Signature Bronze Program. Planning Area 7W 7W has approximately 37.4 acres along the westem boundary, adjoining Grand Park Drive and the 6th Fairway. Site planning considerations will include its relationship to Grand Park Drive, the planned 6th Fairway, the trail system, and sloping terrain. 9. Water Supply and System Water systems meeting Town of Fraser, State of Colorado and other applicable requirements will be provided for domestic water supply. The water systems are the responsibility of the developer or district and will be conveyed to the appropriate entity as applicable. Planning Area 8Wa This area has 58.2 acres along Grand Park Drive above the planned 9th and 10th Fairways. Site planning considerations include its relationship to Grand Park Drive, the planned 9th and 10th Fairways, its orientation and sloping terrain. 10. Wastewater Collection Wastewater systems meeting appropriate sanitation district, State of Colorado and other applicable requirements will be provided for wastewater collection. The wastewater systems are the responsibility of the developer or District and will be conveyed to the Fraser Sanitation District or other appropriate entity as applicable. Planning Area 8Wb This area has 9.0 acres along the railroad adjacent the planned 10th and 11th Fairways. Site considerations include the railroad and the planned 10th and 11th Fairways. 11. Grading and Drainage Grading and drainage improvements are required to meet Town of Fraser and State of Colorado standards for erosion control and run-off.Planning Area 9W 9W includes 23.8 acres on a hill surrounded by open space including the planned 10th and 11th Fairways; the railroad and Planning Area lOW The clubhouse is planned for this enclave, overlooking the practice range, 10th, 1 st, 9th and 18th fairways. The architecture will draw from the rustic forms and materials of the great lodges. 12. Geologic Features Geological features will be investigated in sufficient detail by a qualified professional to meet Town of Fraser standards for design and construction of improvements. Planning Area 10W lOW includes 40.8 acres on a hill surrounded by open space including the planned 10th, 11 th, 12th and 13th Fairways, railroad and Planning Area 9W This area is near Leland Creek and Grand Park Drive adjacent Planning Area 9W The architecture will draw from the rustic forms and materials of the great lodges. 1= 1~ u 13. Design Control Design Control at Grand Park is guided by a set of govemance tools, which include Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Design Guidelines.j~ 14. Development Standards The development standards provide guidance for use, height, open space, and setbacks for projects within each planning area. Setbacks allowed in mixed use planning areas are subject to FPDP and Plat approval of the Town of Fraser - all applicable building code regulations apply in all cases. Planning Area 11W This area has 16.1 acres near the planned clubhouse overlooking the golf complex. It is a good location for lodging, residential resort recreation uses. Planning Area 12W This area has 26.5 acres along Grand Park Drive overlooking the planned golf complex. Site design will include consideration of pathways and four season use pattems. 15. Sign Guidelines A Signage Design Guideline may be submitted for Grand Park to the Town of Fraser for review based on its unique signage needs. 16. Planning Area Character Descriptions Descriptions for Grand Park planning areas are a reflection of the vision for the project based on the land use. The character descriptions are a guide and may change based on market conditions and other factors that may affect the land use mix, intensity, and design of the planning areas over the projected twenty-five year development period. Planning Area 13Wa This area has 21.7 acres along Grand Park Drive, above the planned 6th Fairway. Site planning considerations will include the 6th Fairway, its orientation and sloping terrain. Planning Area 13Wb This area has 37.7 acres along the western edge of the project surrounded by the 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th 7th and 8th Fairways. Site planning considerations include the planned golf, its orientation and sloping terrain. 0; Planning Area 1Wa This area of 30.3 acres wraps the south end of Cozens Meadow, between US Highway 40 and the Old Victory Road. It is served from US 40, the Old Victory Road, and Grand Park Drive. It has trail access from the existing Meadow and planned Grand Park trails. The development is planned as a "main streef' concept with buildings addressing street frontages, pedestrian linkages and accessible parking. The Cozens Meadow will remain as open space and a recreation amenity. Architecture will draw from alpine ranch and 1800c. townscapes with a pattem of retail on the ground floor of buildings and office/residential above in 2 - 6 floor volumes. Traditional window patterns, arcades and boardwalks; simple roof forms that include dormers and gable ends; and a variety of building forms, as was the tradition in towns and ranches will be encouraged. Planning Area 16W This area has 92.0 acres inside of the Road B loop. Site planning considerations will include lot siting, Road B, orientation and sloping terrain. Planning Area 14W This area has 72.1 acres along Road Band C above the planned golf course. Site planning considerations will include the planned 2nd, 4th Fairways, and terrain. Planning Area 15W This area has 26.4 acres off of Road B adjoining open space and the planned 3rd and 4th Fairways. Site planning considerations will include lotting pattems, orientation to the planned golf course, Road B and sloping terrain. u I Planning Area 17W This area has 121.8 acres along Road B. Site planning considerations will include lot siting, Road B, its orientation and sloping terrain. Planning Area 18W This area has 24.2 acres along Road B above Leland Creek. Site considerations will include Road B, its orientation and sloping terrain. Planning Area 19W This area has 47.4 acres along Road B above the planned 17th Fairway. Site planning considerations include Road B, the 17th Fairway, its orientation and sloping terrain. Planning Area 20W This area has 40 acres south of Grand Park Drive adjoining the planned 14th, 15th, 16th and 17th Fairways. Planning considerations include the provision of open space in the adjoining forest for wildlife. Planning Area 21W This area has 13.4 acres along Grand Park Drive and planned 14th and 17th Fairways. Site planning considerations include Grand Park Drive, its orientation and golf. Planning Area 23W Planning Area 23W includes approximately 468.1 acres of open space and development including the planned golf course, Cozens Meadow, Elk Creek Meadow, and Leland Creek. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Planning Area Land Use Open Space Height Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard 1Wa mixed-use 10% 55'-75' 0' 0' 0' 1Wb Attached 15% 45' 10' 6' 10' 2W mixed-use 10% 75' 0' 0' 0' 3Wa Attached 10% 45' 10' 6' 10' 3Wb attidetach 10% 45'/35' 10' 6' 10' 3Wc mixed-use 10% 45' 0' 0' 10' 4W mixed-use 10% 45' 10' 6' 10' 5W attidetach 10%/15% 45'/35' 10' 6' 10' 6W Facilities 15% 45' 20' 6' 10' 7W attidetach 15% 45'/35' 10'/15' 6'/6' 10'/10' 8Wa attidetach 15% 45'/35' 10'/15' 6'/6' 10'/10' 8Wb Attached 15% 45' 10' 6' 10' 9W mixed-use 15% 50' 20' 0' 10' 10W mixed-use 15% 50' 20' 0' 10' 11W attidetach 10%/15% 45'/35' 10" 6' 10' 12W attached 15% 45' 10' 6' 10' 13Wa detached 15% 35' 15' 10' 10' 13Wb detached 15% 35' 15' 10' 10' 14W detached 15% 35' 15' 10' 10' 15W detached 15% 35' 15' 15' 10' 16W detached 15% 35' 15' 15' 10' 17W detached 15% 35' 15' 15' 10' 18W detached 15% 35' 15' 10' 10' 19W attidetach 15% 45'/35' 10'/15' 6' 10' 20W attidetach 15% 45'/35' 10' 6' 10' 21W attidetach 15% 45'/35' 10' 6' 10' 23W facilities n/a 50' 15' 15' 10' Notes 1. Setbacks allowed in mixed use planning areas are subject to FPDP and plat approval of the Town of Fraser; all applicable building code regulations apply. 2. 1 Wa -10' improvement and 0' building setback from US 40; pocket park 3. 2W - 15' improvement and 20' building setback from Old Victory Road 4. 3Wc - 20' improvement and 20' building setback from US 40 5. 4W - 20' improvement and 20' building setback from Old Victory Road GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO EXFRASER~ MAlNTENANCS FACILITY 6W 45' HT] MAAYS POND 13Wb 35' HT] KINGS CROSSING 15W 35' HT] 17W 35' HT] f~' f DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LOCATION MAP '.", . d\ ",,. OOS-<O'I~'09 i{-.~ NORTH STATE OF COLORADO }SS County of GRAND Filed or record thi !? day of at '-I'IJij o'clock Recorded in Book Fees $ II' ~ Deputy AN AMENDMENT TO THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT NOTES DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 SHEET 3 OF 11 19 N Cl i5 1::1 w.j I FOREST MEAD~, SOLAR COMMUNITY 1 rt ELECIRIC E'ASElENT lie. Z42 PO. W4) SEE NaTE 12 g. GRAND PARK I I I I I I I I I I PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLANo 2, ii,A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO FRASER JOHNS RENDEZVOUS WU TAl CHUAN & SHENG LING 30 1: o 0 w BYERS PEAK LTD PARTNERSHIP I I I I I I I I I I SITZMARK SUBDIVISION TIMBERS SUBDIVISION REC. NO. 140404) o LEGEND o CONIFEROUS TREE VEGETATION PRIMARY DRAINAGES w SCENIC VIEWS HIDEAWAY PINES 30% OR GREATER SLOPES OOS"eJ'~'jlPq I VILLAGE I " 18D485 STATE OF COLORADO } SS I 0 300 600 1200 County of GRAND I Filed for record this I day of I THREE at o'clock I Recorded in Book I ~ ;;;^ L.IilOSENE 1JJ I NORTH SCALE: 1"=600'-0"TWO I l' )rJ ~~f.I FeeS$~ DeputyI I ./ I I I AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN SITE ANAL YSIS DATE: JUNE 16,2005 SHEET 4 OF 11 6W 14.0 ac i- l 7 l l 7 II II II II II t 7W II 37.4 ac II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II I II II II II II II II II II II II II l l l l 13Wb 37.7 ac I GRAND PARK EX FRASER MAINTENANCE FACILITY CEMETARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN LOCATED IN SECTIONS 20,28,29, 30,31,32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO TUBING HILL\ ApprOl.ed POOP Proposed POOP Proposed ApprOl.ed P reposed Planning Planning Area Planning Area ApprOl.ed POOP Proposed POOP ApprOl.ed POOP POOP Lodging POOP POOP Area Acreage Acreage Residential Units Residential Units Lodging Units Units Commercial Commercial Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. detached attached detached attached 1Wa 33.6 30.3 230 230 300 300 150,000 140.000 1Wb 4.3 5.9 40 40 2W 25.1 33.8 250 150 100 278 278 100,000 30,000 3Wa 11.2 8.2 110 95 3Wb 5.4 11.8 80 50 30 3Wc 11.7 12.0 60 60 30,000 70,000 4W 8.5 11.2 100 100 65,800 105,800 5W 16.9 17.1 100 70 30 6W 4.0 4.0 7W , 88.8 37.4 45 225 50 .90 8W 50.1 n/a 63 75 public site public site 8Wa n/a 58.2 83 110 8Wb n/a 9.0 40 9W 45.5 23.8 153 33 73 10W 42.6 40.8 118 40 134 11W 9.7 16.1 10 24 10 31 200 200 20,000 20,000 12W 15.6 26.5 92 92 350 350 30,000 30,000 13W 31.1 n/a 50 150 50 13Wa nla 21.7 40 100 13Wb n/a 37.7 40 14W 49.6 72.1 117 117 15W' 26.1 26.4 12 12 16W' 102.5 92.0 90 90 17W' 120.0 121.8 72 120 18W n/a 24.2 61 18Wa 23.2 n/a 14 18Wb 42.1 n/a 47 19W 35.9 47.4 86 93 40 70 20W 12.5 40.0 57 26 56 21W 23.6 13.4 50 20 30 21Wa n/a n/a 21Wb n/a n/a , 22W 80.1 nla 80 subtotal 919.7 842.8 686.0 1857.0 1052 1411 23W 466.8 468.1 TOTAL 1386.5 1310.9 2543.0 2463.0 1278 1278 395,800 395,800 E n APPROVED PDDP PROPOSED PDDP oos-o 1~10~ 17W 121.8ac I STATE OF COLORADO }SS County of GRANO Filed or record this day of at J./I o'cloc _M. Recorded in Book Page_ o 300 600 1200 Fees$ II!~ NORTH SCALE: 1"=600'-0" AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 PLANNING AREA COMPARISON SHEET 5 OF 11 SITE DATA CHART Planning A\9. Approx. % Total Residential Lodging Commercial Area Density Acres Area Units Sq. Ft. LEGEND j detached attached 1Wa 7.6 30.3 2.3% 230 300 140,000 I I RESIDENTIAL 1Wb 6.8 5.9 0.5% 40 I I MIXED USEl 2W 7.6 33.8 2.6% 150 100 278 30,0003 ~~ I3Wa13.1 8.2 0.6% 95 OPEN SPACE/ GOLF COURSE 3Wb 4.7 11.8 0.9% 50 30 * CLUBHOUSE SITE 3Wc 5.2 12.0 0.9% 60 70,000 4W 9.3 11.2 0.9% 100 105,800 * PROPOSED MAINTENANCE FACILI 5W 4.5 17.1 1.3% 70 30 6W 0.0 4.0 0.3% public site ~ ROADWAYS v"- 1'(' 7W 8.1 37.4 2.9% 50 90 _.7\ MAJOR DRAINAGES 8Wa 2.0 58.2 4.4% 83 110 ,i 8Wb 2.2 9.0 0.7% 40 REGIONAL TRAIL 9W 4.7 23.8 1.8% 33 73 200 20,000 10W 4.7 40.8 3.1% 40 134 350 30,000 ......-...... , COMMUNITY TRAIL 11W 2.6 16.1 1.2% 10 31 50 , 12W 3.5 26.5 2.0% 92 100 ......-.....' ON-ROAD TRAIL 13Wa 1.4 21.7 1.7% 40 13Wb 0.6 37.7 2.9% 40 14W 1.6 72. 1 5.5% 117 15W* 0.5 26.4 2.0% 12 16W* 1.0 92.0 7.0% 90 0 300 600 1200 17W* 0.6 121.8 9.3% 120 18W 2.5 24.2 1.8% 61 o'clock M. Recorded in Book Page_19W 3.1 47.4 3.6% 40 70 j;R~. ROS~Ei20W2.1 40.0 3.1% 26 56 21W 5.1 13.4 1.0% 20 30 NORTH SCALE: 1 "=600'-0" " >n.. ~ Fees $ I J !,,- Deputysubtotal3.0 842.8 64.3% 1052 1411 23W 468.1 35.7% TOTAL 1310.9 100.0% 2463 1278 395,800 AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN DENSITIES MAY BE ADJUSTED DEPENDENT UPON PROVISION OF CENTRAL SERVICES ~ OOS-~JE~J'(~O! LAND USE PLAN SHEET 6 OF 11 I II C\l : I JOHNS DRIVE a: I 1 I:, 1 i= i GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO r- I I I I I 1 I; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o't' 0{Y-t- < i A<i~v.; 00; 0#" V 0 CEMETARY GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO Ii I I I I I I I I I I 1/E Q u n u II TUBING HILL, RO/'oll12 co\J~10\t \0) S't.<- I I I j c 13Wb 37.7 ac I I I LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER WITH MANHOLE PROPOSED ROADWAY 2W DEVELOPMENT PARCEL DESIGNATION GRAND PARK BOUNDARY EXISTING SANITARY SEWER WITH MANHOLE 15W 26.4 ac ii j.: ii n J 11 c NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN SHOWS THE MAIN SEWER LINES FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT. MAIN SEWER LINES ARE: A. SEWERS REQUIRED OUTSIDE OF DEVELOPMENT AREAS B. SEWERS THAT CONVEY SEWAGE FROM MORE THAN ONE DEVELOPMENT AREA. 2.IF DEVELOPMENT PARCELS, 16W, 17W AND 15W ARE NOT SERVED BY SEWER THEN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IS 2 ACRES. 3. THE SEWER SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED ON A PHASED BASIS IN ORDER TO UTILIZE EXISTING FACILITIES WHERE AVAILABLE AND TO PROVIDE FACILITIES CAPABLE OF HANDLING ULTIMATE CAPACITY AS REQUIRED. STATE OF COLORADO} County of GRAND 55 Filed r record thi day of at LJ M. Page_ t:l~~~J1J Deputy Fees $ t!!'-- I t)OS.O 1~'Dt; e MeurerIASSOCIATES 17W 121.8 ac 1 I L S 89'10'03" W Basis of Bearings! II I' o 300 600 1200 ENGINEER Meurer & Associates 143 Union Blvd Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 303) 985-3636 NORTH SCALE: 1 "=600'-0" AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN PRELIMINARY SEWER MASTER PLAN DATE: JUNE 16,2005 SHEET 7 OF 11 5 I I I I I I H j.: li H l; f~ 2: il I j I I l I I I I I X I I 1/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1___ I 01~ I I t; r::. n i! I I II I t I I I I I I f j l I i= li I: g I I l , I I 15W 26.4 ac I I BLUE ZONE ,..'/-1 YELLOW ZONE I I I I I I I I o BLUE ZONE TANK FF 8795 31.'f:t I I I GREEN ZONE TANK FF 9195.5 16W 92.0 ac I I 1& V 5)/rS,,'Y t::J"Y Q., I I 17W 121.8ac RED ZONE TANK FF 9415.5 18W 24.2 ac I' 1 fIIII1" I, 8Wa f' 58.2 ac I' I 10W..... 40.8 at! l/ I-------,~ n~~ I 11 / 16.1 ac 1) 0 20W 40.0~ I 1 I I 1 I ) I RE N ZONE ) P MP . T TION ~ r;;-==--. l I I \ 1JI r Basis of Beurirv:r:;) II t&/ ~ 5) '/ $-'V 0 I~1 , I / I .I' I I I I I I PURPLE ZONE PUMP . / STATION.. / I I s 8~:r10'03" ~ - - - - -, I C \. '-0' GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO J J LEGEND PROPOSED STORAGE TANK PROPOSED PUMP STATION A PRV VALVE BLUE ZONE WATER LINE II _ YELLOW ZONE WATER LINE GREEN ZONE WATER LINE RED ZONE WATER LINE PRESSURE ZONE BOUNDARY STATE <OF COLORADO} 80unty of GRAND 58 Filed~record.t'}is g- day.~f!/~~~ at L/..' fJ 'I o'clock P' M. Recorded in Book Page_ RA.L(~~ENE iF$>., $; , 11""'- Deputy OOS-D 1~"'D9 ASSOCIATES Meurer ENGINEER Meurer & Associates 143 Union Blvd Suite 600 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 303) 985-3636 o 300 600 1200 NORTH SCALE: 1 "=600'-0" AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN PRELIMINARY WATER MASTER PLAN SHEET 8 OF 11 DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 1 S i 1 i i\ a li' a:. 1 't-/. o..v.;-:;.? Q0I0\// 7<-~ -- J,' i"/ ./ v 8"i' 6" 1' V II II II II II Ii II II II II II II II II Ii II II II II 1 I! II Ii II II II II II II II II II 1 1/' p.?'" l-::--:;"--- 9'';..- Z___ I ,,' " I' ~ I' , \ ,-,' (~I I _/\ \ I I ' / / ,_ ' I I' ' I,", i " ,,/ -' I,' ," / I '" ' / I" C -" / I ,-- 1/,1 1-// I}I I I( .----::::/ ~~;.<.../-/ )...: (/ --- I I / ,/ ' / 1\\ I / 1/' / -/~-- /---./'" ./- I / / / ' , I \ ,,~ J ". '" I II f /-..../'....~ I I /-_::>-.///./-"'" ~ I / / I / I / / -_./ / ./~./ ' 1\\' / I II I , U- \ /','' I'~- - -, I \, I' j II!I'- \\//,' 1 I ,,__,- I / ,/ ,, 11' I', \ ,," / ,-,I / I I 1/ I/,I ( ,\. I} / / /' I / ./ f //' / ,.,' \ I II I / I / j//" /_', 1/ ,_', \ / I / I I I, ,I' ", I I I I / ' I / / I I / 1.../1"' 1'_ 1'1' \ I,/ I' / 1 ~-/'/.'/ I / \ '/ } I }"! / -_ ~ ~ _ /' V / / 1_ / "- ./} i I' } / __./' .... 1./ I / I III/If ___ .//'_ 1"'- ... \. 1 I I I 1',111 f /(''''-_ / )' I / I / 111111//-/'/ /" \ ,/ ' / / 111", 1/ / / / I I' ': 1/ I" II I / ,,'_ " / I ' I 1,II\lilll , ,/ / / / 11,1\ "i : / //./ -/'" 1111""' ,,' ' I / II I \ I \ 1\ \ \ / / ./ I \ \ .-/ / /' I , , ", \ I \ ' -,""' II I I / ",' Wi I I I / I / ( J (I / c. I \ \ I 1........ --- / I I , I \ - - ./ 1 \ "- 1 /'-~ I \ I \ I \ \ \ \ I . S;!? 1\,1 (1)11))\ ~,' I I I I I I I / ' I I I \ I I I: \ I I /,""'-' , I I \ I \ I I / / I / ,__ \ I I 1 I I I I I I'I: \' I I' ,-, \ ->~ I \ 1 I I I I I , / I _" -, I '''' \ 1//'1'1' 1\\ 1// -', \ \ ' i' ' I / I I I I I " \ \ \ I I / 1- ' \ \ , I I I I / / " \ I / 'I I / / ',' \ \ \ I 1//1111/ 1111111/ \ ",\\\ I I I I I II () // III I ,/-' ",' , \ \ iI/IIIII/// IU '\\"\\ 11111 llil/I,/ II /- \ I \\ 1\\ I \ i I Ii 1///11//// / \ " I I \ I I \ II "II II II' // /I , \ \ I \ \ \ ' JIII})// IIIIIII r____ 1\ ,, 1\1 \ 1/// 11\\ \ ' /.... \ \ I 1/---'///( II 11/ \ \ I" \ \ 1/1/// I 1/ I! / / 111/;"((( /! / I I \ , I \ / i I " I I I I II II \ \ \ I i / I / I ' I IIIII}IIIIII/ I) 11(/ J I J I J I / I I r I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I, I I I I I r/ r- I I I I I ( I I \ \ I ) I r_./ f I I 1 r~r .".r-::' oj f r~^/...._ r---__r~ f r- r- ( i I I I J I I I I I I I r r ~ I ....- ........./- I / ./-- Ir--- I 1/// ---' I / I I /~ \. I ( I' I I \ I' I I 1 I I \ I r/ / I I ~_/'/ I r / \ I /./ _ _ _ ~ ___ '- / 1". I / r .... I \ \./' I ".- --- I ( .' r /' - - '- ~ .... ~ ~./ ./ ./ '" r -- ---- I / /' ~ /'/' / I I' - I' / j' \ \ / I I / / " ,/'- I I I I' I / ,,//' I / J r____" \ \ I I I II /.~, .... ( / 1/ ( I I 11// I/// ff! II / 1 / I I I/ IJ \ / I'/", /I } I I I' " ! / i/ / I I 1', ,_,," \ ///,/ 1 / ' I,ll " I I J"__'/""/'__'" )/ 1,,1//1 \ ' 1/1 I , 1///iI,' , II J I" / -' /_'"'' ' / / f ,,,,, I I I ( , r/"" r~-'" / 11/ 11((\ ).- I I " / / / / / u I ,.-- 1// /_, / / I / / II I \ / f !/ /" I / / " / ( (/ I , I , I I / / " I-' ' I f I I I I I r I I \ \ I / , I I bl,\)1o r r( J I i I /' PU\NNEO OE\lELOl-'\\II~'" A PAR'T Of SEC'TIONS 20, 28, 29, 30. 3~, 32 TOWNSHIP ~ SOU'TH, RANGE 75 WES'T Of 'THE 6'TH pM COUN'TY Of GRANO, S'TA'TE Of COLORADO GRAO\NG N01E.S C=--' -=-- ,=---' =----~- 1 FlNJ>,L ROAOWA' OESIGN INCLUOING S,RE," 51 ANQARDS ",, 0 GRAG"" AS E"'C>EO ON 1\1E pco.N ARE SUeJECnO FINAL R",,'EW ",,0 "PROVAL. I r c;2CO-S- D , ,., 6 q 600 1200 NOR1H SCALS: \,'::600'-0" AN ""ENOMEl'>' Of ,HE RENOE'VOUS 2003 "",NNEO OE\lELOPMENl OISIRICl pLAN OA1S: JUNE 16. 2005 feeS sJL1? PREL\M\NA1 GRAO\NG f SHee v,<,,' z' l :/ ~ '\ '~ j ~~, Ie::,0 \/ /" ~ t- "'- ,I" r ~ "::----...~;j GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO I EX FRASER~ MAINTENANCE II FACILITY If l I I I I l l I I J c J J 6~) o/v- '---- F '-- ~ .I J: J s V-- ....r""J ,,\ II v~ (, J '\ I 1\1.-1 \ v( \ \ 0 /\ '----- ) l: ( I I ~\ r ':0 I DRAINAGE NOTES 1, GENERAL HISTORIC DRAINAGE PATTERNS WILL BE MAINTAINED POST DEVELOPMENT, WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE STORM WATER RUNOFF FLOWING TO LELAND AND ELK CREEK, AND EVENTUALLY TO THE FRASER RIVER.v 2. INCREASED STORM RUNOFF CAUSED BY DEVELOPMENT WILL BE DETAINED IN DETENTION / WATER QUALITY PONDS AND RELEASED AT OR BELOW HISTORIC RATES. I l I I I I 1 I I I I, I I I I I / 1----\ 0 I J 1/- 0 ) / I J - - / (' I 1'-- ---....... \'- I 3. DRAINAGE FACILITIES WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF EACH OF THE PLANNING AREAS. 4. THE DETENTION PONDS SHOWN IN PLANNING AREAS 2W AND 23W MAY ALSO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PROVIDE WATER AUGMENTATION STORAGE. LEGEND 8950___________ EXISTING CONTOUR I,,~/ BASIN BOUNDARY SUBDIVISION PARCEL BOUNDARY EXISTING CULVERT BASIN INFORMATION ffi A = SUB-BASIN DESIGNATION B = SUB-BASIN AREA FLOW ARROW v"v":":":":""vv"vvv"v""vv" vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv v"v v"vvvvvvvvvv"vvv q",;'.;',,",,",,",,",,",,",,"..:,.:,,:,,",," PROPOSED DETENTION POND E g U A g g I I I I I I I I I 3 11! 1l! I RUN OF WINTER PARK ODS"O l:t ,e~ V Carroll & Lange ~ Professional Engineers & Land SUTVeyorS 47 Cooper Creek Way, Suite 328 Winter Park. Colorado 80482-3345 970} 726-8100 o 300 600 1200 STATE OF COLORADO }SS Cou~ty of GRAND filed r r cord this day of 1 . M. i~~~11 . )1J Deputy iFe.es sJ1! NORTH SCALE: 1"=600'-0" AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN ARAPAHO NATIONAL FORES1 DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 SHEET 10 OF 11 J III Q I I I I I I I I I I l5 IE Q Q D D i= 8 I I I I I I I I I I 3' Is g C-i u E i:> i.: i" li! I" I I ''\ EXFRASER~ ~ MAINTENANCE /1 /.f\~~ FACILITY 'ft., \\ \\ 1\ ~1\.<h!1I " 1 \\U~ u 1~1 o q(o V; C); O..)>y 0 KINGS CROSSING RD. 1~J 1:t~2;~~/ CO /-~~~~ h/ II II II II I I, I I II II II II II I I II II II II I, II I, II II II j 1/ II II II Ii II II Ii II II Ii II II 0\- I; Ii ROADWAYS RIGHT -OF-WAY PAVEMENT GRAVEL ROADWAY SHOULDER WIDTH LANE WIDTH WIDTH GRAND PARK DR 80' 4' J ROAD B 60' 6' j ROAD 0 60' 6' OLD VICTORY RD 80' 6' a a o cr TYPICAL ROADWAY CRITERIA GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN A PART OF SECTIONS 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO ROADWAY NOTES 1, Roadway Facility Guidelines Right of way and roadway standards have been designated as a planning guide based on the Grand Park PDD land use, roadway classification and laneage for local, collector, and arterial roadways. 2. Intersection Criteria Intersection and auxiliary lane criteria are identified for Grand Park in the Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis. 3. Roadway Design Criteria Site, environmental and geological constraints; development standards; construction techniques; and materials will be considered in the development of roadway layouts and construction documents. 4. Final Roadway Design Approval The Town of Fraser will grant final right of way, intersection and roadway approval at the time of roadway design review. 5. Signalized Intersections Signalized intersections conforming to the Rendezvous PDD and to the 1986 FraserlWinter Park Roadway Network Plan have been identified along US 40 in the Grand Park PDD. 6. Railroad Grade Separated Crossings (GSC) Based on the Grand Park PDD, a vehicular/pedestrian GSC is planned in the vicinity of Leland Creek connecting with Grand Park Drive, the Old Victory Road, and the King's Crossing Road extension. The Leland Creek GSC serves regional traffic and safety needs. 7. Grand Park Secondary Access A secondary access point will be made on County Road 72. Grand County and other parties under its regulatory control will participate in improving County Road 72 to an acceptable standard. 8. Old Victory Road Connection Provision will be made for permanent public roadway and trail access between County Road 72 and the Old Victory Road. 9. South Connector Sufficient right of way will be provided on Grand Park Drive and Road B to allow for future transportation facility improvements as they become applicable, including a potential connection south, linking to the DWB parcel, and an alternate access to the potential expansion of Winter Park Resort. Benefiting parties, other than Grand Park, inciuding the Town of Winter Park, Winter Park Recreation Association, Intrawest, the Denver Water Board, Grand County and others will fund improvements that become necessary beyond the base roadway facility. 10. Transit It is intended that a community-wide transit will serve Grand Park on its street network. The Developer will cooperate with the Town of Fraser in the identification of future alternative transit corridors. ADJACENT TRAIL OOS.-r()'~ I{J~ 8' N/A 8' 8' Deputy fgg1? Llll.---- o 300 600 1200 NORTH SCALE: 1 "=600'-0" AN AMENDMENT OF THE RENDEzVOUS 2003 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PLAN ROADWAY MASTER PLAN DATE: JUNE 16, 2005 SHEET 11 OF 11 SHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W.2) ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\1-cover.dwgGENERAL NOTES 1. THIS FINAL PLAN AMENDMENT IS APPLICABLE TO PLANNING AREA 2W.1 LOT 25, LOTS 56-67 AND PLANNING AREA 2W.2. THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK FINAL PLATS FILINGS #1, # 2, & #3 LOTS 1-24 & 26- 55 ARE NOT IMPACTED BY THIS AMENDMENT.2.LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.3.GRAND PARK PDDP 2W SETBACKS FRONT SETBACK: 0 FEET SIDE SETBACK: 0 FEET (MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES: 10 FEET)REAR SETBACK: 0 FEET OLD VICTORY ROAD: 20' BUILDING SETBACK OLD VICTORY ROAD: 15' IMPROVEMENT 4.BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 75'-0" EXCLUDING CHIMNEYS, VENTILATORS, AND PIPES. BUILDING HEIGHTS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE AVERAGE FINISHED GRADE OF THE PRIMARY FOUR CORNERS OF THE STRUCTURE.5.LANDSCAPE SHALL BE ALLOWED AND INSTALLED PER THE TOWN OF FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE GRAND PARK CC&R'S.6.PLANNING AREA 2W IS ENTITLED FOR 250 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. DENSITY MAY BE TRANSFERRED ACCORDING TO THE AMENDED ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND 9 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE TRANSFERRED FROM PLANNING AREA 5W BY THIS FINAL PLAN.PLANNING AREA 5W, 79 OF THE 100 UNITS HAVE BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR, LEAVING 21 UNITS TO BE PLATTED IN 5W.7.TO PROTECT AGAINST WILDFIRES AND ENHANCE FOREST HEALTH THE FOLLOWING WILDFIRE MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRED:A.) WATER HYDRANTS WILL BE SITED AT APPROPRIATE DISTANCES; AND B.) UTILITIES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED UNDERGROUND. 8.AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVE, MOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVE, AND OLD VICTORY ROAD SHALL BE PUBLIC. ALL OTHER DRIVES AND PARKING SHALL BE PRIVATE.9.ALL DRIVEWAYS, PARKING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SWALES AND DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL BE PRIVATE AND MAINTAINED BY GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS.10.SIGNAGE DETAILS, INCLUDING MATERIALS, DIMENSIONS AND SIGN AREA WILL BE PROVIDED WITH BUILDING PERMIT. SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE GRAND PARK SIGNAGE PLAN. 11.FINAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND A SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. 12.TRACTS A, B, C, D, E AND F ALONG WITH COMMON OPEN SPACE WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS.13.THE RECORDED FINAL PLAT SHALL GOVERN IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THIS FINAL PLAN AND THE FINAL PLAT.14.REMAINING ENTITLEMENTS WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2W WILL BE DEVELOPED AT A FUTURE TIME. PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.3 OF THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT, THE ACREAGE OF PLANNING AREAS WILL ADJUST TO ACCOMMODATE THE APPROVED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.COVER SHEET 1 COVER SHEET 1 OF 14 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 OF 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 OF 14 2W BOUNDARY PLAN 4 OF 14 SITE PLAN 5,6 OF 14 OPEN SPACE PLAN 7 OF 14 LANDSCAPE PLAN 8,9 OF 14 LIGHTING PLAN 10 OF 14 PHASING PLAN11 OF 14 TRANSIT PLAN 12 OF 14 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 13 OF 14 UTILITY PLAN 14 OF 14 333231 29 2830 19 20 21 18 17 16 SITE PLANNEROWNER VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"-2500'-0" SHEET INDEX CERTIFICATE FOR APPROVAL BY THE TOWN BOARD: OWNER CERTIFICATE ENGINEERSURVEYOR MIKE KERVIN CORE CONSULTANTS, INC.78967 U. S. HWY 40 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 970) 564-3900 TONY KREMPIN TOPKNOT CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 129 E BYERS AVE HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO 80451 970) 725-3310 GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC PO BOX 30 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 JEFF MARCK TERRACINA DESIGN 10200 EAST GIRARD AVENUE SUITE A-314 DENVER, COLORADO 80231 (303) 632-8867 APPROVED AND ALL PUBLIC DEDICATIONS ACCEPTED THIS________DAY OF__________, __________BY THE FRASER TOWN BOARD. THE TOWN OF FRASER DOES NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTNESS OR ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION DISCLOSED ON THIS PLAN NOR ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR INFORMATION PRESENTED TO THE TOWN OF FRASER WHICH INDUCED THE TOWN TO GIVE THIS CERTIFICATE.BY: ________________________________MAYOR, TOWN OF FRASER MORTGAGEE'S CONSENT THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF _______________ , THE HOLDER OF A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN AND TO THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON THIS PLAT, UNDER DEED OF TRUST RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO.OF THE GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO REAL PROPERTY RECORDS, HEREBY CONSENTS TO THIS PLAT AND AGREES THAT THE LIEN OF THE DEED OF TRUST IS HEREBY SUBORDINATED TO THIS PLAT.BY:________________________________ NAME:_______________________________TITLE:________________________________ NOTARY: ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS_________DAY OF___________, 20_____, BY AS____________________OF _____________________ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:_____________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. HAS CAUSED HIS/HER NAME TO BE HEREUNDER SUBSCRIBED THIS_______DAY OF___________, 20_____.GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,PRESIDENT STATE OF COLORADO ))SS.COUNTY OF __________ )THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS_______DAY OF_______, 2021,BY__________________ AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:______________________A PARCEL OF LAND CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING RECORDED PLATS;ALL OF THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1 RECORDED JULY 21, 2015 AT RECEPTION NUMBER 2015-004926;ALL OF THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 AT RECEPTION NUMBER 2016-006979;ALL OF THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 3 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 AT RECEPTION NUMBER 2016- 006982;ALL OF THE REPLAT OF LOT 25, THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2 ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF; LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER,COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBES AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE W1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NW1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SAID SECTION 28 BEARS S 00° 17' 02" E, (BASIS OF BEARING); THENCE N 55° 31' 18" W, 2,843.64 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “A” OF SAID THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1, SAID NORTHWESTERLY CORNER BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE THE FOLLOWING (13) THIRTEEN COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1:1.)THENCE N 55° 46' 36" E, 90. 90 FEET;2.)THENCE N 83° 41' 09" E, 86. 86 FEET;3.)THENCE S 41° 19' 06" E, 61. 04 FEET;4.)THENCE S 26° 54' 21" E, 53. 41 FEET;5.)THENCE S 20° 56' 01" E, 51. 67 FEET;6.)THENCE S 11° 05' 17" E, 50.17 FEET;7.)THENCE S 17° 30' 20" W, 43.32 FEET;8.)THENCE S 60° 34' 37" W, 54.67 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;9.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 576.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03° 25' 36" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.45 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 30° 23' 49" E, 34. 44 FEET;10.)THENCE N 68° 22' 14" E, 45. 20 FEET;11.)THENCE S 70° 26' 10" E, 63.26 FEET;12.)THENCE S 56° 07' 33" E, 460.62 FEET;13.)THENCE S 88° 38' 45" E, 10.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 17, SAID THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2;THENCE THE FOLLOWING (3) THREE COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2:1.)THENCE S 88° 38' 45" E, 181.60 FEET;2.)THENCE N 04° 16' 46" W, 252.43 FEET;3.)THENCE N 62° 16' 12" E, 47.80 FEET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID REPLAT OF LOT 25, THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2; THENCE THE FOLLOWING ( 3) THREE COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID REPLAT OF LOT 25, THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK,FILING NO. 2;1.)THENCE N 24° 43' 32" W, 51.33 FEET;2.)THENCE N 67° 41' 29" E, 130.00 FEET;3.)THENCE S 29° 03' 07" E, 106.24 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 26, SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2:THENCE THE FOLLOWING (9) NINE COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2:1.)THENCE N 83° 18' 27" E, 36. 68 FEET;2.)THENCE S 49° 30' 17" E, 4.53 FEET;3.)THENCE S 25° 43' 52" E, 130.96 FEET;4.)THENCE S 64° 44' 28" W, 134.63 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;5.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 278.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° 13' 22" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 25.34 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 18° 55' 15" E, 25. 33 FEET;6.)THENCE N 77° 03' 17" E, 99. 57 FEET;7.)THENCE S 12° 56' 43" E, 70.41 FEET;8.)THENCE S 01° 51' 48" W, 72.35 FEET;9.)THENCE S 16° 04' 57" E, 34.86 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 34, SAID THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 3;THENCE THE FOLLOWING (24) TWENTY FOUR COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 3:1.)THENCE S 65° 07' 48" E, 46. 55 FEET;2.)THENCE N 27° 58' 03" E, 101. 66 FEET;3.)THENCE S 62° 01' 57" E, 62. 05 FEET;4.)THENCE N 26° 45' 37" E, 114. 78 FEET;5.)THENCE S 62° 57' 00" E, 138. 18 FEET;6.)THENCE S 17° 02' 40" E, 143.76 FEET;7.)THENCE S 71° 11' 08" W, 112.82 FEET;8.)THENCE N 64° 46' 22" W, 24.79 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;9.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 39° 08' 31" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 47.82 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 64° 32' 18" W, 46. 80 FEET;10.)THENCE S 14° 23' 58" E, 46.85 FEET;11.)THENCE S 16° 13' 22" E, 141.28 FEET;12.)THENCE S 53° 31' 41" W, 89.91 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;13.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 272.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08° 07' 12" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 38.55 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 48° 08' 29" E, 38. 52 FEET;14.)THENCE N 42° 02' 41" E, 105. 03 FEET;15.)THENCE S 66° 18' 09" E, 53. 33 FEET;16.)THENCE S 87° 44' 13" E, 102. 24 FEET; 17.)THENCE S 72° 40' 16" E, 39.43 FEET;LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2W.1 OWNER CERTIFICATE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, OLHASSO II, JOHN BERNARD TRUST HAS CAUSED HIS/HER NAME TO BE HEREUNDER SUBSCRIBED THIS_______DAY OF___________, 20_____.OWNER STATE OF COLORADO ))SS. COUNTY OF __________ )THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS_______DAY SHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W.2) ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\1-cover.dwgLEGAL DESCRIPTION 2W.1 (CONTINUED)LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 18.)THENCE S 15° 44' 16" E, 124.57 FEET;19.)THENCE S 81° 26' 17" E, 40.44 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “J”;20.)THENCE S 08° 33' 43" W, 56.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “M”;21.)THENCE N 81° 26' 17” W, 208.87 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;22.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 53° 04' 19", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 303.82 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 54° 54' 07" W, 293.07 FEET;23.)THENCE N 28° 21' 58" W, 93.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;24.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 172.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49° 54' 09", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 149.81 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 53° 19' 03" W,145.12 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “M” BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “G” OF SAID THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 2;THENCE THE FOLLOWING (4) FOUR COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK,FILING NO. 2:1.)THENCE N 78° 16' 07" W, 211.95 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;2.)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 372.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 55' 26", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 83.91 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 84° 43' 50" W,83.73 FEET;3.)THENCE S 88° 48' 26" W, 54.99 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;4.) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 49' 19", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 79.13 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 84° 16' 54" W, 78.93 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “G” BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT “D” OF SAID THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1;THENCE THE FOLLOWING (8) EIGHT COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1:1.) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13° 14' 47", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 75.83 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 70° 44' 51" W, 75.66 FEET 2.)THENCE N 64° 07' 28" W, 101.58 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;3.) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 678.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 48' 11", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 151.50 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 57° 43' 22" W, 151.19 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENCY;4.)THENCE S 38° 40' 43” W, 38.80 FEET;5.)THENCE N 34° 28' 52" W, 210.64 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;6.) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 3464.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°53' 42", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 175.02 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 33° 02' 01" W,175.00 FEET;7.)THENCE N 31°35'10” W, 198.76 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;8.) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1674.85 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01° 24' 04", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.96 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 30° 29' 47" W, 40.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.AREA = 10.713 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2W.2 PHASE 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29 BEARS S 89°49'44" W (BASIS OF BEARINGS), THENCE N 72°00'35" W, 1292. 37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE N 55° 40' 13" W, 476.68 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1164.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21° 11' 21"AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 430.47 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 45° 04' 32" W, 428.02 FEET;THENCE N 34° 28' 52" W, 139.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF TRACT B, THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1 RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2015004926, SAID COUNTY OF GRAND RECORDS;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 1, THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK,FILING NO. 2 RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2016006979, AND THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK, FILING NO. 3 RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2016006982, ALL IN SAID COUNTY OF GRAND RECORDS, THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES AND DISTANCES:1)THENCE N 38° 40' 43" E, 38.80 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;2)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 678.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 48' 11" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 151.50 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 57° 43' 22" E, 151.19 FEET;3)THENCE S 64° 07' 28" E, 101.58 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;4)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 27° 04' 06" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 154.96 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 77° 39' 31" E, 153.52 FEET;5)THENCE N 88° 48' 26" E, 54.99 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;6)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 372.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 55' 26" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 83.91 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 84° 43' 50" E, 83.73 FEET;7)THENCE S 78° 16' 07" E, 211.95 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; 8)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 172.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49° 54' 09" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 149.81 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 53° 19' 03" E, 145.12 FEET;9)THENCE S 28° 21' 58" E, 93.12 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;10) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23°06' 34" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 132.29 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 39° 55' 15" E, 131.40 FEET;S 59° 28' 19" W, 185.24 FEET;S 34° 19' 47" W, 42.74 FEET; S 16° 09' 48" E, 53.16 FEET;S 34° 19' 47" W, 70.93 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.AREA= 6.200 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.PHASE 2 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29 BEARS S 89°49'44" W (BASIS OF BEARINGS), THENCE N 82°12'21" W, 814.03 FEET TO A POINT ON NON-TANGENT CURVATURE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2036.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 32' 07", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 19.03 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 55° 24' 09" W, 19.03 FEET; THENCE N 55° 40' 13" W, 492.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH CORNER OF ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK FILING NO. W, A SUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED IN THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK FILING NO. 1 PLAT, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES AND DISTANCES:1)THENCE N 34° 19' 47" E, 70. 93 FEET;2)THENCE N 16° 09' 48" W, 53.16 FEET;3)THENCE N 34° 19' 47" E, 42.74 FEET;4)THENCE N 59° 28' 19" E, 185.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK FILING NO.3, A SUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2016006982, SAID GRAND COUNTY RECORDS AND A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH AND EAST LINES OF SAID WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK FILING NO. 3, THE FOLLOWING THREE 3) COURSES AND DISTANCES:1)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGNENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29° 57' 45", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 171.53 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 66° 27' 24"E,169.58 FEET;2)THENCE S 81° 26' 17" E, 208.87 FEET;3)THENCE N 08° 33' 43" E, 40.93 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 128.53 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08° 52' 14" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 19.90 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 61° 02' 06" E, 19.88 FEET;THENCE S 56° 37' 30" E, 14.62 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 73° 35' 37"AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 32.11 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 86° 34' 42" E, 29.95 FEET;THENCE S 40° 13' 07" E, 60.00 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 168.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28° 12' 36", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 82.72 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 35° 40' 35" W, 81.88 FEET;THENCE S 21° 34' 17" W, 46.31 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 530.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 45' 27", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 118.01 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 27° 57' 01" W, 117.77 FEET; THENCE S 34° 19' 45" W, 235.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.AREA= 4.521 ACRES, MORE OR LESS PHASE 3 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN A PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29 BEARS S 89°49'44" W (BASIS OF BEARINGS), THENCE S 72°02'19" W, 503. 69 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE N 49° 40' 55" W, 228.06 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2036.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° 27' 11"AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 193.77 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 52° 24' 30" W, 193.70 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVE;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVE, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4)COURSES AND DISTANCES:1)THENCE N 34° 19' 45" E, 235.05 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;2) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 530.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°45' 27", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 118.01 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 27° 57' 01" E,117.77 FEET;3)THENCE N 21° 34' 17" E, 46.31 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE;4)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 168.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28° 12' 36" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 82.72 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 35° 40' 35" E, 81.88 FEET;THENCE N 40° 13' 07" W, 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVE AND A POINT OF NON- TANGENT CURVATURE;THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES OF SAID AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVE, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2)COURSES AND DISTANCES:1)THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 228.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23° 54' 44", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 95.16 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 61° 44' 15" E, 94.47 FEET;2)THENCE N 73° 41' 37" E, 145.45 FEET;THENCE S 44° 41' 17" E, 254.65 FEET;THENCE S 10° 25' 02" W, 32.92 FEET;THENCE S 56° 17' 11" W, 117.36 FEET;THENCE S 00° 22' 54" W, 311.01 FEET; SSWMWMSSSSWM BL D G 13SS>>>>>>>>>>>>> X X X X PBAUGPBPBWMFO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO F E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500E500E500E500E500E500E500E500E500E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 GS GS GSESESESESESESESEV C E N T ERSSWMWMSSSSWM BL D G 13SS>>>>>>>>>>>>> X X X X PBAUGPBPBWMFO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO F E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500E500E500E500E500E500E500E500E500E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 E500 GS GS GSESESESESESESESEV C E N T E R 2W.1 2.62 AC UNDEVELOPED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT LOTS 56-67, WILLOW DUPLEXES IN FPDP TO BE REMOVED. PLAT NEVER RECORDED 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 EX. COZEN DITCH 2W.1 10.7 AC UNDEVELOPED FUTURE DEVELOPMENT RAILROAD ROW RAILROAD ROW FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY EX. COZEN DITCH OLD VICTORY RD. AMERICAN WILLOWDR.MOUNTAINWIL LO W D R OLD VICT O R Y R D MOU N T AI N WI L L O W D R. 30% SLOPES 25 WETLANDS p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_ willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\3- site plan ex.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W. 1 & 2W.2)ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 LEGEND EXISTING2W PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY EXISTING CONDITIONS 10' CONTOURS 2' 18' 28' 28' SSWM BL D G 13>>>>>>> PBPBWMS S GS GS GS GSGSESESESESESESRE C R E A T I O N C E N T ERSSWM BL D G 13>>>>>>> PBPBWMS S GS GS GS GSGSESESESESESESRE C R E A T I O N C E N T E R EX. COZEN DITCH 2W.1 10.7 AC EX. COZEN DITCH POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTION FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY OLD VICTORY RD. AMERICAN WILLOWDR.MOUNTAINWIL LO W D R OLD VICT O R Y R D MOU N T AI N WI L L O W D R. RAILROAD ROW RAILROAD ROW FRASER REC CENTER 2W.2 16.8 AC p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_ willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\2- boundry.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W. 2)ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK BOUNDARY PLAN WM SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SSSSSS SS WSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWS WS WSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWS WS WSWSUPUPUPG1G1G1G1G1G1G1G2 BOUNDARY LINE ROW BUS STOP S T XWXWXWXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSSTx wsxwsxwsxws x w s x w s xwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssx w s xssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxwsxwsxwsSTSTEEEEEE E E E E E E E E E E E EE E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G GGG G G G G GEEEEEEEGGGGGG GGGGXSXWXWXWXWXW XW XW XW XW XW X W X W X W X W X W X W XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW X W X W XW XWXWXWXWXWXWXW XW XW XWXWXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSxssxssW W W W xws WWW WWXWXWXWxssxssxssxssxssxs s x s s xssXWXWxwsxwsxwsxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssO L D V I C T O R Y R D BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING G TYPE I G A R A G E D 7 G A R A G E C 7 MOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVE GARAGE E - 14 TRASH TRASH 40 7 5 10 4 2 7 7 11 BUILDING H TYPE II BUILDING I TYPE II BUILDING J TYPE I BUILDING K TYPE II BUILDING L TYPE II GARAGEG - 7G A R A G E F - 7 G A R A G E H- 7 G A R A GE I- 7 PHASE 1 M O U N TAI N WI L L O W D R PHASE LINE 4 5 7 9 9 16 10 6 12 2 8 5 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 15 LOT 14 LOT 16 PHASE 2 MATC H LI N E MATC H LI N E 10' 20' 26' 26' 20' 10' R25' 24' 24' 26' 26' 24' 24' 24' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25'R25' 24' R25' R25' 15'IMPROVEMENT SETBACK 10'- 0" 5' 5' 19'- 4 26' 26' 24' 26' 10' 20' 10' 20' 10' 20' 10' 20' 10' 20' 8' 5' 5' 5' 5' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25'7'- 4"7'- 3"10'- 9"7'- 4"8'- 3"9'-3"9'- 4"7'- 4"8'- 3"7'- 3" 26'20' STORM EASEMENT 24'p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\ 2w-willows\_willows apartments\ cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\5-site plan pr.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNINGAREA 2W. 1 & 2W.2) ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK SITE PLAN 5 LEGEND 0Scale: 1"= 50'-0" LOT 1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WM SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWS WS WS WSWSWSWS WSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWS WSWSWSWSWSWSWS WS WSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSWSUPUPUPUPUP . O L D V I C T O R Y R D BOUNDARY LINE ROW FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY BUS STOP REALIGNED COZEN DITCH STxwsxwsxwsxwsxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssSTSTEEEEE E E E G G G G GGGXW XW XWXWXWXWXW XW XW O L D V I C T O R Y R D CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE BUILDING A TYPE II BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING C TYPE I BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING G TYPE I GRAND PARK COMMUNITY TRAIL POOL & DECK GARAGE A - 14 GARAGE B -14 G A R A G E D 7 G A R A G E C 7 MOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVE AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVEKITCHEN EXISTING TRAIL GARAGE E - 14 TRASH TRASH TRASH LOT LINE ROW OLD VICTORY ROAD ROW TO BE PLATTED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT R26' R38'- 0" 40 7 5 10 4 2 7 7 11 15 15 7 7 4 23 8 12 9 10 3 4 BUILDING H TYPE II PLAT BOUNDARY PLAT BOUNDARY PHASE 1 PHASE LINE 5 5 TURN- AROUND EASEMENT LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 11 POSSIBLE FUTURE CONNECTION PHASE 2 PHASE 3 MATC H LI N E MATC H LI N E 10' 20' 10' 20' 20' 10' 5' 26' 26' 20' 10' 26' 5' 26' 24' R25' 24' 24' 26' 26' 24'26' 26' 26' 24' 24' 26' 24' 24' 5' R25' R25' R25' R25'R25' R25' 24' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25'R25' 51'-6" 24'-8" 35'-5"20' BUILDING SETBACK 15' IMPROVEMENT SETBACK 10'-0" 12'- 6" 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 19'-4 40'-9" 40'-10" 26'- 5" 26' 5' R25'R25' 7'-4" 7'-3" 8'-3" 7'- 3" 60'26' 20' STORM EASEMENT 24'60'p:\ cornerstone master folder\ grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\5-site plan pr.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADOPLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W. 2)ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK SITE PLAN 6 LEGEND 0Scale: 1"= 50'- UPUPUPUPUP . G1G1G1G1G1G1G1G2STST 2W.1 OPEN SPACE 2W.1 OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE TRACT A TRACT A TRACT A TRACT B BOUNDARY LINE ROW 10' UTILITY AND SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT BOUNDARY LINE ROW POSSIBLE FUTURE CONNECTION BUSSTOPMOUNTAIN W I L LOW DR O L D V I C T O R Y R D REALIGNED COZEN DITCHMOUNTAINWILL OW D R AMERICAN WILLOW DR. O L D V I C T ORYRD MOUNTAINW IL L O W D R GARAGE TYP TRASH ENCLOSURE TYP. TRASH ENCLOSURE TYP. GARAGE TYP BUILDING G BUILDING F BUILDING E BUILDING D CLUBHOUSE BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING C POOL AMENITY BUILDING H BUILDING I BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING L 10' UTILITY & SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT 10' UTILITY & SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 15 LOT 14 LOT 16 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 15 LOT 14 LOT 16 p:\ cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\ 2w-willows\_willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\4-landscape.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATEOF COLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W. 1 & 2W.2) WM SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSW6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6 W6 W6 W6W6W6W6 W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6 W6W6W6 W6 W6 W6 W6 W6 W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6UPUPUPUPUP .>> STSTSTEEEEE E E E TRACT A TRACT A TRACT A TRACT B MOUNTAI N WILLOW DR AMERICAN WILLOW DR. O L D V I C T O R Y R D BUILDING G BUILDING F BUILDING E BUILDING D CLUBHOUSE BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING C POOL AMENITY BUILDING H POOL BANQUETTE SEATING WALL & 8' FIREPIT SPA SPA 4' FIREPIT 4' FIREPIT POOL EQUIPMENT BUILDING CLUBHOUSE POOL FENCE p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_ willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\4- landscape.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OFCOLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W.2)ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK LANDSCAPE PLAN 80Scale: 1"= 50'-0"2550100N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME % OF MIX APPLICATION RATE 1.SEED APPLICATION: DRILL SEED 0.25"-0.5" INTO THE SOIL. IN AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO A DRILL HAND BROADCAST AT DOUBLE THE ABOVE RATE AND RAKE 0.25"-0.5" INTO THE SOIL.ON SLOPES STEEPER THAT 2:1 HYDROSEED AT DOUBLE THE RATE.2.SOIL AMENDMENTS: PREPARE SOIL WITH SAND BASED GRANULAR HUMATE AT THE RATE OF 435 LBS. PER ACRE.3.FERTILIZATION APPLICATION: APPLY BIOSOL ALL NATURAL ORGANIC FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 1800 LBS. PER ACRE IN ALL SEEDING AREAS.4. HYDROMULCH APPLICATION: HYDROMULCH SHALL CONSIST OF CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH AND MULCH TACKIFIER AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATES OF 2.000 LBS. PER ACRE AND 100 LBS. PER ACRE CONSECUTIVELY.MANCHAR SMOOTH BROME BROMUS INERMIS LEYSS 20% 10.0 POTOMAC ORCHARD DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.20% 10.0 PUBESCENT WHEATGRASS AGROPYRON TRICHOPHORUM 20%10. 0 PERENNIAL RYE LOLIUM PERENNE L. 11%5.5 REUBENS CANADA BLUE POA COMPRESSA 10%5.0 ANNUAL RYE LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.10%5.0 TIMOTHY PHLEUM PRATENSE 5%2. 5 CICER MILKVETCH ASTRAGALUS CICER L.2%1.0 ALSIKE CLOVER TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM 2%1.0 TOTAL 50.0 LBS/PLS/ACRE NATIVE GRASS MIX PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE NOTE:A LANDSCAPE CONCEPT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO REINFORCE AND ENHANCE THE NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS NESTLED WITHIN THE UPLANDS OF THE MEADOWS. THE NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDES ASPENS, WILLOWS, AND OTHER RIPARIAN PLANTS. THE INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT IS TO INTEGRATE THE RIPARIAN ZONE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE LANDSCAPE PALETTE WILL INCLUDE NATIVE GRASS WITH LOW GROWING RIPARIAN PLANTS AS THE UNDERSTORY AND GROUPINGS OF PINES ANDASPENS.EROSION CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION.LEGEND DEVELOPMENT SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SSSSSS SS W6 W6 W6 W6 W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6 W6 WATERWATERTOP:67. 3UPUPG1G1G1G1G1G1G1G2* O L D V I C T O R Y R D MOUNTAINWILL OW DRMOUNTA INWILL OW D R BUILDING G BUILDING H BUILDING I BUILDING J BUILDING K BUILDING L p:\ cornerstone master folder\ grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\4-landscape. dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADOPLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W.2)ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK LANDSCAPE PLAN 90Scale: 1"= 50'-0"2550100N Know what's below.before you dig.Call R COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME % OF MIX APPLICATION RATE 1.SEED APPLICATION: DRILL SEED 0.25"-0.5" INTO THE SOIL. IN AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO A DRILL HAND BROADCAST AT DOUBLE THE ABOVE RATE AND RAKE 0.25"-0.5" INTO THE SOIL.ON SLOPES STEEPER THAT 2: 1 HYDROSEED AT DOUBLE THE RATE.2.SOIL AMENDMENTS: PREPARE SOIL WITH SAND BASED GRANULAR HUMATE AT THE RATE OF 435 LBS. PER ACRE.3.FERTILIZATION APPLICATION: APPLY BIOSOL ALL NATURAL ORGANIC FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 1800 LBS. PER ACRE IN ALL SEEDING AREAS.4.HYDROMULCH APPLICATION: HYDROMULCH SHALL CONSIST OF CELLULOSE FIBER MULCH AND MULCH TACKIFIER AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT THE RATES OF 2.000 LBS. PER ACRE AND 100 LBS. PER ACRE CONSECUTIVELY. MANCHAR SMOOTH BROME BROMUS INERMIS LEYSS 20%10. 0 POTOMAC ORCHARD DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.20%10. 0 PUBESCENT WHEATGRASS AGROPYRON TRICHOPHORUM 20%10.0 PERENNIAL RYE LOLIUM PERENNE L. 11% 5.5 REUBENS CANADA BLUE POA COMPRESSA 10% 5.0 ANNUAL RYE LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM. 10%5.0 TIMOTHY PHLEUM PRATENSE 5%2.5 CICER MILKVETCH ASTRAGALUS CICER L.2%1.0 ALSIKE CLOVER TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM 2%1.0 TOTAL 50.0 LBS/PLS/ACRE NATIVE GRASS MIX PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE NOTE:A LANDSCAPE CONCEPT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO REINFORCE AND ENHANCE THE NATURAL CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS NESTLED WITHIN THE UPLANDS OF THE MEADOWS. THE NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDES ASPENS, WILLOWS, AND OTHER RIPARIAN PLANTS. THE INTENT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT IS TO INTEGRATE THE RIPARIAN ZONE INTO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE LANDSCAPE PALETTE WILL INCLUDE NATIVE GRASS WITH LOW GROWING RIPARIAN PLANTS AS THE UNDERSTORY AND GROUPINGS OF PINES AND ASPENS. EROSION CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WILL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE WM UPUPUPUPUP . G1G1G1G1G1G1G1G2>> STSTSTO L D V I C T O R Y R D STREET LIGHT TYP.STREET LIGHT TYP. CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE BUILDING A TYPE II BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING C TYPE I BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING G TYPE I POOL & DECK GARAGE A - 14 GARAGE B - 14 G A R A G E D 7 G A R A G E C 7 MOUNTAINWILLO WDRIV E AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVEKITCHEN GARAGE E - 14 TRASH TRASH TRASH BUILDING H TYPE II BUILDING I TYPE II BUILDING J TYPE I BUILDING K TYPE II BUILDING L TYPE II GARAGEG - 7G A R A G E F - 7 G A R A G E H- 7 G AR A G E I- 7 p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\ grand park meadow\2w- willows\_willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\ 6-lighting plan.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OFCOLORADO PLANNING AREA 2W. 1 & 2W. 2) ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK 10 LEGEND SITE PLAN 0Scale: 1"= 60'-0"3060120N Know what's below.before you dig. Call R DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY LIGHTING PLAN LEGEND LIGHT POLE LIGHT POLE 1. LIGHT POLE SHALL MATCH EXISTING LIGHTPOLES WITHIN THE GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT OR APPROVED EQUAL BY OWNER. LIGHTING WM UPUPUPUPUP . G1G1G1G1G1G1G1G2BOUNDARY LINE ROW POSSIBLE FUTURE CONNECTION BUS STOP STSTSTO L D V I C T O R Y R D BOUNDARY LINE ROW 10' UTILITY AND SNOW STORAGE EASEMENT OLD VICTORY ROAD ROW TO BE PLATTED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT STREET LIGHT TYP. STREET LIGHT TYP. CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE BUILDING A TYPE II BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING C TYPE I BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING G TYPE I POOL & DECK GARAGE A - 14 GARAGE B -14 G A R A G E D 7 G A R A G E C 7 MOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVE AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVEKITCHEN GARAGE E - 14 TRASH TRASH TRASH BUILDING H TYPE II BUILDING I TYPE II BUILDING J TYPE I BUILDING K TYPE II BUILDING L TYPE II GARAGEG - 7G A R A G E F - 7 G A R A G E H- 7 G A RA G E I- 7 PHASE 1 PHASE 3 PHASE 2 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6 LOT 7 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 11 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 15 LOT 14 LOT 16 p:\cornerstone master folder\grand park\grand park meadow\2w-willows\_ willows apartments\cad\submittals\submittal 1 - fpdp round 5\6- lighting plan.dwgSHEET OF 14 NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADOPLANNING AREA 2W.1 & 2W.2) ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK 11 LEGEND STSTST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE BUILDING A TYPE II GARAGE B GARAGE D GARAGE C MOUN T AI N WI L L O W D R AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVEGARAGE A GARAGE E BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING G TYPE I BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING C TYPE I FFE 95.86 FFE 94.36 FFE 93.89 FFE 92.39 FFE 93.24 FFE 90.71 FFE 85.0 FFE 86.25 FFE 89.61FFE88. 11FFE 87.24 FFE 85.74 FFE 86. 0 869586958694 87038704 8700 8 7 0 0 8715 8725 8710 8705 87008695 86908689 868586758675 868086798675 8675 86608651 8669 8665 8 6 64 8675 8685869086908684868586838683868986 90 8686869086948693 8693869 1 8 6 9 2 869286918689868886858683868486868680 8695 8690 86878686 8686868486 9 2 EX. 18" RAILROAD CULVERT EX. 3-24" RCP RELOCATED INLET &24" STORM FROM OVR OVERTOPS MWD & TRAVELS DOWN CULDESAC BUILDING J 18" RCP EAST SIDE DRAINS HERE PROP. 2- 24" COZEN' S DITCH CULVERTS RELOCATED COZEN'S DITCH EX. 18" RAILROAD CULVERT BYPASSESSITERAILROADDOWNGR AD ETOW E S T RAILROAD DOWNGRADETOWESTRAILR OAD DOWNGRAD ETOW E S T EXISTING WILLOWS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING WILLOWS DEVELOPMENT TRASH TRASH TRASH TRASH ACCESSIBLE PARKING/ RAMP TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING/RAMP TYPICAL RELOCATED COZEN'S DITCH EX. COZEN'S DITCH EX. MEADOW TRAIL EX. COZEN'S DITCHEX. COZEN'S DITCHEX. COZEN'S DITCH UNFINISHED FEATURE POND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIDE WALKS TYPICAL BUILDING J TYPE I BUILDING H TYPE II BUILDING I TYPE II BUILDING K TYPE II BUILDING L TYPE II GARAGE G GARAGE I GARAGE H GARAGE FFUTUREAMENITYPLAYGROUND)OLDVICT O R Y R D MOUNT AI N WILL O W D R NARROWLEAF CT. BLUESTEM CT. TRACT D TRACT E TRACT E 8685 8680 8690 8703 871086998699 8693869486958695 86808 6 8 1 8 6 8 08678 86808678 8676 8682 86858680 8 6 7 8 8677 867786778677867786788690 8 6 8 0 8694 8694 8686 POND 1 DETENTION WATER QUALITY FEATURE POND 1 DETENTION WATER QUALITY POND 3 WATER QUALITY POND 2WATER QUALITY COZEN'S DITCH STORMWATER DIVERSIONINTO POND 4866886778678 SHEET 13 OF 14 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN80'SCALE 1: 80 0 DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION TYPICAL NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING STSTST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE BUILDING A TYPE II GARAGE B GARAGE D GARAGE C MOUN T AI N WI L L O W D R AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVEGARAGE A GARAGE E BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING G TYPE I BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING C TYPE I FFE 95.86 FFE 94.36 FFE 93.89 FFE 92.39 FFE 93.24 FFE 90.71 FFE 85.0 FFE 86.25 FFE 89.61FFE88. 11FFE 87.24 FFE 85.74 FFE 86. 0 869586958694 87038704 8700 8 7 0 0 8715 8725 8710 8705 87008695 86908689 868586758675 868086798675 8675 86608651 8669 8665 8 6 64 8675 8685869086908684868586838683868986 90 8686869086948693 8693869 1 8 6 9 2 869286918689868886858683868486868680 8695 8690 86878686 8686868486 9 2 EX. 18" RAILROAD CULVERT EX. 3-24" RCP RELOCATED INLET &24" STORM FROM OVR OVERTOPS MWD & TRAVELS DOWN CULDESAC BUILDING J 18" RCP EAST SIDE DRAINS HERE PROP. 2- 24" COZEN' S DITCH CULVERTS RELOCATED COZEN'S DITCH EX. 18" RAILROAD CULVERT BYPASSESSITERAILROADDOWNGR AD ETOW E S T RAILROAD DOWNGRADETOWESTRAILR OAD DOWNGRAD ETOW E S T EXISTING WILLOWS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING WILLOWS DEVELOPMENT TRASH TRASH TRASH TRASH ACCESSIBLE PARKING/ RAMP TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING/RAMP TYPICAL RELOCATED COZEN'S DITCH EX. COZEN'S DITCH EX. MEADOW TRAIL EX. COZEN'S DITCHEX. COZEN'S DITCHEX. COZEN'S DITCH UNFINISHED FEATURE POND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SIDE WALKS TYPICAL BUILDING J TYPE I BUILDING H TYPE II BUILDING I TYPE II BUILDING K TYPE II BUILDING L TYPE II GARAGE G GARAGE I GARAGE H GARAGE FFUTUREAMENITYPLAYGROUND)OLDVICT O R Y R D MOUNT AI N WILL O W D R NARROWLEAF CT. BLUESTEM CT. TRACT D TRACT E TRACT E 8685 8680 8690 8703 871086998699 8693869486958695 86808 6 8 1 8 6 8 08678 86808678 8676 8682 86858680 8 6 7 8 8677 867786778677867786788690 8 6 8 0 8694 8694 8686 POND 1 DETENTION WATER QUALITY FEATURE POND 1 DETENTION WATER QUALITY POND 3 WATER QUALITY POND 2WATER QUALITY COZEN'S DITCH STORMWATER DIVERSIONINTO POND 4866886778678 SHEET 13 OF 14 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN80'SCALE 1: 80 0 DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION TYPICAL NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING XWXWXWXWXWXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSSTxwsxwsxwsxwsxws xwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxwsxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxws xssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxwsxwsSTSTE E E EEEEE E E E EE E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G GGGEEEEEEG GG GGGG GGGxssxssXSXSXSxss xss xssxssxssxw s xwsXWXWXWXW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XWXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXSXS XSxssxssW W W W xws WWW W WXWXWxssxssxssxssxssxssXWXWxw s xwsxssxssxssxssxssxssxssxssXS XS XS XS XS XS XSS S S S S SSXSXSXSXSXS XS XS XS XS XS XS XSXSXS XSXSXSXSSS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SSSSSSSSSSSXW XW XW XW WM WMWMWMXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXWXW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW XW W M WM WM WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM WM W MWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM WM WMWMWM WMWM WM WMWMWMWMW M W M WMWM WM SSSSSS S SSSS SSS SSS WMWMWM WMWMCLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE BUILDING A TYPE II GARAGE B GARAGE D GARAGE C MOUN T AI N WI L L O W D R AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVEGARAGE A GARAGE E BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING G TYPE I BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING C TYPE I 869586958694 87038704 8700 8 7 0 0 8715 8725 8710 8705 8700 869586908689 868586758675 868086798675 8675 86608651 8669 8665 8 6 6 4 8675 BUILDING J TYPE I BUILDING H TYPE II BUILDING I TYPE II BUILDING K TYPE II BUILDING L TYPE II GARAGE G GARAGE I GARAGE H GARAGE F FUTUREAMENITYPLAYGROUND)OLDVICTO R Y R D MOUNT AI N WILL O W D R NARROWLEAF CT. BLUESTEM CT. TRACT D TRACT E TRACT E 8685 8680 8690 8703 8710 86998699 8693869486958695 80' SCALE 1: 80 0 SHEET14 OF 14 UTILITY PLAN EX. FIRE HYDRANTEX. FIRE HYDRANT EX. FIRE HYDRANT EX. FIRE HYDRANT EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP.STORM TYPICAL TRIPLE COZEN' S DITCH CULVERTS 12" WATER MAIN MWD / MWD ON- SITE 8" WATER MAINS TYPICAL ON- SITE 8" WATER MAINS TYPICAL ON-SITE 8"SANITARY SEWER MAIN TYPICAL ON- SITE 8"SANITARY SEWER MAIN TYPICAL ALL BLDGS 6" SANITARY SERVICES 6" WATER SERVICES TYPICAL ALL BLDGS 6" SANITARY SERVICES 6" WATER SERVICES TYPICAL PROP. FIRE HYDRANT ON- SITE 8"SANITARY SEWER MAIN TYPICAL PROP. STORM TYPICAL PROP. FIRE HYDRANT PROP. FIRE HYDRANT ON- SITE 8"WATER MAINS TYPICAL NOVEMBER 16, 2021 FINAL PLAN - AMENDMENT 2 LOCATED IN SECTION 29,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO PLANNING AREA RELEASE: _______DESIGNED: _______CAD: _______ QA/QC: _______JOB NO. 18-030SHEET 1 OF 5KDS12- 22-21MSKCORE CONSULTANTS, INC. 3473 SOUTH BROADWAYENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 303. 703.4444 LIVEYOURCORE. COM LAND DEVELOPMENT ENERGY PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTUREFINAL PLATALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK SE COR. NW1/4, NE1/4, SEC. 29(NE1/16 COR.)FOUND 30" LONG #6 REBAR WITH 3- 1/4"ALUMINUMCAPPROPERLYMARKED &STAMPED "2018PLS34592"SW COR. SE1/ 4, NE1/ 4, SEC. 29( C- C E1/16 COR.)FOUND 30" LONG #6 REBAR WITH 3-1/4"ALUMINUM CAP PROPERLY MARKED & STAMPED "2014 PLS 34592"POINT OF COMMENCEMENTE1/4 CORNER T1S, R75W, 6THP.M., SEC. 29FOUND 1-1/2" STEEL POST WITH2-1/2" GLO BRASS CAP PROPERLYMARKED "1933"SE1/4 NE1 4SECTION 29BASIS L=37.87'R=23. 67'= 91°40'32" CH=33. 96' CHB= S80° 09' 33" WWILLOWS AT GRAND PARKFILING NO. 2REC. 2016006979WILLOWS AT GRAND PARKFILING NO. 1REC. 2015004926TRACT BTRACT CMOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVEREC. 2015004926TRACT DLOT 16LOT 15LOT 13LOT 12LOT 14FILI N G N O 1 FILI N G N O 2 LOT17LOT 18BUILDING LGARAGEIN55°40'46" W 184. 59' L= 7. 07' R= 4. 50'= 90° 00' 00" CH= 6. 36' CHB= N10° 40' 43" WN55° 40' 43" W15. 50' N 3 4 1 9 1 7 E 5 1 0 0 S55° 40' 43" E19. 57' L 2 5.5 7'R= 23.67'= 6 1°5 3 ' 2 3 " C H B N10° 29' 42" E CH = 2 4 . 3 4 ' L=54.34'R=112.29'= 27° 43' 28" CHB= N06° 35' 34" WCH=53.81'S7° 15'54" W1. 25' L= 91. 85' R= 83. 67'= 62° 54' 00"CHB= S24° 11'06" ECH= 87.31' S55° 40'16" E1. 44' L= 38. 66'R=23. 67'=93°35' 50"CH=34. 50'CHB=N77° 31'49" EN81°55' 59" W17.56'N8°04'01"E 5 2 6 7 S81°55'59"E16.33'L= 5.76'R= L=37.87'R=23.67'=91°40'32"CH=33.96'CHB= S80° 09' 33" WLOT 1221, 616 SF0. 496 ACWILLOWS AT GRAND PARKFILING NO. 3REC. 2016006982MOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVEREC. 2016006979TRACT GNARRO W L E A F COURT REC. 201600 6 9 7 9 LOT 34BUILDING HBUILDING IBUILDING JBUILDING KBUILDING LGARAGEHGARAGE IGARAGEGN9°24' 33" W 52.67'N80°35'27"E16.33'C 8 N9° 24'20"W5.00'L=15.93'R=23.67'= 38°33'52"CH=15.63'CHB=N28° 41'29"WS 3 41 91 7 W 15 1 1N55°41'00"W 180. 68' N 3 4 1 9 1 7 E 15 5 0 L= 4. 48' R= 3. 95'= 65° 03' 35" CH= 4. 25' CHB= N06° 13' 08" WL= 0. 76' R= 1. 71'= 25° 28' 07" CH= 0. 75' CHB= N40° 05' 58" WL= 33. 89' R= 23. 67'=82°02'33"CH=31.07'CHB= S75° 20' 33" WS 3 4 1 9 1 7 W 5 0 0 0 N55° 40' 46" W 184. 59' L= 7.07'R= 4.50'=90°00' 00"CH=6.36' CHB=N10°40'43"WN55° 40'43"W15.50'N34°19'17" E 51.00'S55°40'43"E19.57'L=25.57'R=23.67'=61 °5 3 '2 3 "CHB=N10°29'42"ECH =24 .3 4 'L= 54. 34'R=112.29'= 27° 43' 28" CHB= N06° 35' 34" WCH= 53. 81' S7° 15' 54" W1. 25' L= 91.85' R=83. 67'= 62° 54' 00" CHB= S24° 11'06" ECH=87.31'S55°40' 16" E1. 44' L= 38. 66' R= 23. 67'= 93° 35' 50" CH= 34. 50' CHB= N77° 31' 49" EL= 1. 31' R= 0. 67'= 112° 39' 53" CH= 1. 11' CHB= N25° 36' 03" WN81° 55' 59" W17.56'N8°04'01"E5 26 7 S81°55'59"E16.33'L=5.76' R=3.67'=90°00'00"CH=5. 19' CHB=N53°04' 01"EN8°04'01"E4.33' S8°04' 01" W4. 33'L=6.29' R= 4. 59'= 78° 29' 53" CH= 5. 80' CHB= S31° 06' 34" ES81°55' 59" E15.50' S8°04' 01" W 8 1 0 0 N81° 55' 59"W20.12' L=1.62'R=1.05'=88°02'55"CH=1.46'CHB=S48°48'51" WL= 24. 34' R= 23. 63'= 59° 00' 19" CH= 23. 28' CHB= S26°10'52" ES55°41'01" E 104.57' L=40.29' R=23. 67'=97° 31' 43"CH=35.60'CHB=N75° 14'58"EC5N81° 55'59"W15.51'N8°04'01" E 1 1 LOT 1221, 616 SF0. 496 ACTRACT MLOT 47LOT 48UNPLATTEDBUILDING HBUILDING IBUILDING JGARAGE HGARAGE GN9°24'33"W52.67'N80°35' 27" E16.33' C 8N9°24'20"W5.00'L=15. 93' R= 23. 67'= 38° 33' 52" CH= 15. 63' CHB= N28° 41' 29" WS 3 4 1 9 1 7 W 15 1 1 N55° 41' 00" W 180. 68' N34° 19' 17" E15. 50' L= 4. 48' R= 3. 95'= 65° 03' 35" CH= 4. 25' CHB= N06° 13'08"WL=0.76'R=1.71'= 25°28'07"CH=0.75'CHB=N40°05'58"WL=33.89'R=23.67'=82°02'33"CH=31.07'CHB=S75°20'33"WS34°19'17"W 50.00'L=24.34'R=23.63'=59° 00' 19"CH=23.28' CHB= S26°10' 52" ES55° 41' 01" E 104. 57' L= 40. 29' R= 23. 67'= 97° 31' 43" CH= 35. 60' CHB= N75° 14' 58" EC5N81° 55' 59" W15. 51' N8° 04' 01" E 1 1 1 0 0 S55° 41' 01" E 86. 79' L= 6. 58' R= 4. 50'= 83° 45' 46" CH= 6. 01' CHB= S13° 48' 08" ES55° 41' 01" E14. 56' S3 41 859W13 1 0 0 N55° 41' 01" W16. 69' L= 3. 67' R= 2. 53'= 83° 17' 49" CH= 3. 36' CHB= S62° 52' 48" WL= 25. 08' R= 23. 67'= 60° 42' 22" CH= 23. 92' CHB= S11°39'40"EL=15.37'R=52.33'= 16°49'21"CH=15. 31' CHB= S33°58' 03" EL=6. 86'R= 5. 00'= 78° 39' 21" CH= 6. 34' CHB=S64°53' 03" EN75° 47' 16" E15. 01' L= 12. 28' R= 71. 50'= 9° 50' 24" CH= 12. 26' CHB= S14° 19' 45" ES9° 24' 33" E 50. 50' S80° 35' 27" W15. 50' C 9 S9° 24' 33" E 37. 36' C6 2. 80' L= 5. 76' R= 3. 67'= 90° 00' 18" CH= 5. 19' CHB= S10° 40'52"ES 3 4 1 9 1 7 W 16 3 3 S55° 41'01" E 22.67'N 3 4 1 9 1 7 E 16 3 3 L=5.76' R=3.67' = RELEASE: _______DESIGNED: _______CAD: _______ QA/QC: _______JOB NO. 18-030SHEET 1 OF 5KDS12- 22-21MSKCORE CONSULTANTS, INC. 3473 SOUTH BROADWAYENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 303. 703.4444 LIVEYOURCORE. COM LAND DEVELOPMENT ENERGY PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTUREFINAL PLATALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK SE COR. NW1/4, NE1/4, SEC. 29(NE1/16 COR.)FOUND 30" LONG #6 REBAR WITH 3-1/4"ALUMINUM CAP PROPERLY MARKED & STAMPED "2018 PLS 34592"SW COR. SE1/4, NE1/4, SEC. 29(C-C E1/16COR.)FOUND30" LONG # 6 REBAR WITH 3- 1/ 4" ALUMINUM CAP PROPERLY MARKED & STAMPED " 2014 PLS 34592" POINT OF COMMENCEMENTE1/4 CORNER T1S, R75W, 6THP. M., SEC. 29FOUND 1-1/2" STEELPOST WITH2-1/2" GLO BRASS CAP PROPERLYMARKED " 1933" SE1/ 4 NE1 4SECTION 29 S00° 30' 53" E 1318.85'W. LINE SE1/4, NE1/4, SEC. 29 BASIS OF BEARINGSS. LINE SE1/4, NE1/ 4, SEC. 29S89°49'44"W 1321.23'N89° 47'20"E 1319.93'S. LINE NW1/4, NE1/ CHB= S70° 48' 37" EWILLOWS AT GRAND PARKFILING NO. 3REC. 2016006982TRACT MLOT 50A M ER I C A N W I L L OW D R I V E LOT 54LOT 53LOT 52UNPLATTEDLOT 51BUILDING EBUILDING FBUILDING GGARAGE CGARAGE DGARAGE EL= 6. 53' R=61.67'=6° 04'12" CH=6.53'CHB= N85°13'33"EL= 8.36'R= 5.00'=95°45'50" CH=7.42'CHB=N34°18'32"EN13° 34' 23" W13. 89' L= 13. 27' R= 42. 50'= 17° 53' 12" CH= 13. 21' CHB= N68° 24' 55" EN59° 28 19 E 180 80 L= 53. 50' R= 71. 50'= 42° 52' 07" CHB= N80° 54' 23" ECH= 52. 26' S77° 39' 34" E 79. 36' L= 98. 49' R= 71. 50'= 78° 55' 33" CHB= S38° 11' 48" ECH=90. 89'S1° 15' 59" W 32. 04' N88° 44' 01" W15.50'C 2 C1S57°10'53"E 77. 17'L=10.95'R= 24.67'= 25°25'40"CH=10. 86'CHB= N44° 28' 04" WN57° 10' 54" W 71. 88' L= 28. 91'R= 23.67'= 69°58' 44" CH=27.15'CHB= S87° 49' 44" WC5L= 6. 49' R= 4. 32'=86°05'49"CH=5. 90'CHB= S15° 14' 51" WS36°21'02" E15. 54' S5 3 38 5 8 W 131 0 0 N36° 21' 02" W 20. 18' L= 18. 08' R= 52. 33'= 19° 47' 26" CH= 17. 99' CHB= S87° 08' 14" WL= 4. 01' R= 3. 67'= 62°35' 57"CH= 3. 81' CHB= S65° 43' 59" WS 3 4 2 6 0 0 W 2 0 2 8 N55° 34' 00" W 217. 08' S1° 28' 50"W6. 92'N55° 34'00"W 93.41'L= 4. 75' R= 3. 67'= 74° 16' 56" CH= 4. 43' CHB= N18°22'35"WN55° 31'03" W8.86'L=4.16'R= 3.67'=65°00'38"CH=3.94'CHB=N88°01'22"WS59°2819 W 14 97 L = 4 6. 52' R = 2 3. 67' 112 ° 37' 31" C H =3 9. 38'C H B =S 0 3 °09'34" W C4S55° 34'00" E 93.27'N 3 4 2 6 0 0 E 1 8 3 5 S55°33' 33"E 20. 26'S342 6 2 7 W 1 6 3 3 L= 5. 79' R= 3. 67'= 90° 31' 10" CH=5. L= 11. 73' R= 24. 67'= 27° 15' 27" CH= 11. 62' CHB= S70° 48' 37" EL= 111. 34' R= 500.00'=12°45'30" C HB=N27°57' 02" E C H= 111. 11' N21 3 4 1 7 E 4 6 3 1 L= 9 7. 4 9' R 19 8. 0 0' 2 8 1 2' 3 6 C H B N 3 5° 4 0' 3 5" E C H 9 6 5 0 L=69. 35'20° 0 4' 0 3" L 2 8 14'= 8 0 83 3 S56° 37'30" E 61. 38' L= 11.93' R= 112. 00' = 6° 06' 18" CHB=S59°40'39"E CH=11.93' 19.22'18.85' L=104.66'= 12° 45' 30" WILLOWS AT GRAND PARKFILING NO. 3REC. 2016006982A M E R I C A N W I L L OW DR I V E 6 0R O W MOUNTAINWILLOW DRIVE( 36' ROW) LOT 55LOT 54BUILDING EBUILDING FL=98. 49' R= 71. 50'=78°55'33"CHB=S38°11'48"ECH=90.89' S1°15'59"W 32.04' N88°44'01"W15.50'C2C1 S57°10' 53" E 77. 17' L= 10. 95' R= 24. 67'= 25° 25' 40" CH= 10. 86' CHB= N44° 28' 04" WN57° 10' 54" W 71. 88'= 69° 58' 44" CH=27.15'CHB=S87° 49' 44"WS1°28'50" W6. 92' CHB= N46° 20' 37" WCHB= N48° 51' 39" E22' UTILITY EASEMENT5' UTILITY EASEMENT 2 3 1 6 3 L=16.08' 1°57'35" MOUNTAIN WILLOW DRIVEREC. 201500492622'22'3. 33'30' 30'30' 30' LOT724,160 SF0.555 ACL= 37.82'R= 25.04'086°32'27"L= 33.86'R= 234.13'008°17'08" L= 11. 73' R= 24. 67'= 27° 15' 27" CH= 11. 62' CHB= S70° 48' 37" EN 3 4 1 9 4 7 E 2 3 4 9 6 L= 111. 34' R=500.00'=12°45' 30" CHB=N27° 57' 02" E CH= 111. 11' N21 3 4 1 7 E 4 6 3 1 30. 00' 10.98' 23 4 9 6 L=104. 66'= 12° 45' 30" A M E R I C A N W I L L OW D R I V E 6 0 R O W OLD VICTORY ROADNON-EXCLUSIVEEASEMENTTOWN OFFRASERREC #2009-006046BUILDING EGARAGECGARAGEDGARAGEEL=6.53'R=61.67'=6°04'12"CH=6.53'CHB=N85°13' 33" ECHB= N34° 18' 32" EC1S57° 10' 53" E 77. 17' L= 10. 95' R= 24. 67'= 25° 25' 40" CH= 10. 86' CHB= N44° 28' 04" WN57° 10' 54" W 71. 88' L= 28. 91' R= 23. 67'= 69° 58' 44" CH= 27. 15' CHB= S87° 49' 44" WC5L= 6. 49' R= 4. 32'= 86° 05' 49" CH= 5.90' CHB=S15° 14' 51" WS36° 21' 02" E15. 54' S53° 3 8 58 W 1 3 1 00 N36° 21' 02" W 20. 18' L= 18. 08'R=52.33'=19°47' 26"CH= 17. 99' CHB= S87° 08' 14" WL= 4. 01'R= 3. 67'= 62° 35' 57" CH= 3. 81' CHB=S65° 43' 59" WS 3 4 2 6 0 0 W 20 2 8 N55° 34'00"W 217.08'S1° 28' 50" W 6. 92' N55° 34' 00" W 93. 41' CHB= N18° 22'35"WS59°28'19" W 14.97'L =4 6. 52'R =23. 67'= 112° 37' 31" C H = 3 9. 38' C H B = S 0 3 ° 09' 34" WC4S55° 34' 00" E 93. 27' N 3 4 2 6 0 0 E 1 8 3 5 S55°33' 33"E 20. 26'S 3 4 2 6 2 7 W 1 6 33L=5.79'R= 3.67'=90° 31'10"CH=5.21'CHB=S10° 49'07"EL= RELEASE: _______DESIGNED: _______CAD: _______ QA/QC: _______JOB NO. 18-030SHEET 1 OF 5KDS12- 22-21MSKCORE CONSULTANTS, INC. 3473 SOUTH BROADWAYENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 303. 703.4444 LIVEYOURCORE. COM LAND DEVELOPMENT ENERGY PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTUREFINAL PLATALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK SE COR. NW1/4, NE1/4, SEC. 29(NE1/16 COR.)FOUND 30" LONG #6 REBAR WITH 3- 1/ 4" ALUMINUM CAP PROPERLY MARKED & STAMPED " 2018 PLS 34592" SW COR. SE1/ 4, NE1/ 4, SEC. 29(C- C E1/ 16 COR.) FOUND 30" LONG # 6 REBAR WITH 3-1/4"ALUMINUM CAP PROPERLY MARKED &STAMPED "2014 PLS 34592"POINT OFCOMMENCEMENTE1/4CORNERT1S, R75W, 6THP.M., SEC. 29FOUND1- 1/ 2" STEEL POST WITH2- 1/ 2" GLO BRASS CAP PROPERLYMARKED " 1933" SE1/ 4 NE1 4SECTION 29N22°09'49" W 505. 84' BASIS OF BEARINGSS. LINE SE1/ 4, NE1/ 4, SEC. 29S89°49'44" W 1321.23' N89°47'20" E 1319.93' S. LINE NW1/4, NE1/ 4, SEC. 29SW1/4, NE1/4SECTION 29S72°02'19" W 503.69 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD(100' ROW)TRUE POINT 30'30'30'30'WILLOWSAT GRAND PARKFILINGNO. 3REC. 2016006982AMERICAN WILLOW DRIVE(60' ROW)REC. _________________MOUNTAINWILLOW DRIVE(36' ROW)REC. ____________ LOT55LOT 54UNPLATTEDEMERGENCYTURNAROUNDDEDICATED BYSEPARATE DOCUMENTBUILDING AGARAGE BSKISTORAGECLUB HOUSEC7S57°10'53"E 48.54' L=39.55'R=186.67'= 12° 08' 22" CHB= S51° 06' 43" ECH= 39. 48' L = 7 7. 7 5 ' R = 9 6 7. 5 0 '= 4° 3 6' 15 " C HB= N 01° 0 4 ' 5 3" E CH= 7 7. 7 3 ' N3° 23'00"E 56.27'N86°37'00"W 15.66'L=6.73' R=4.50'=85°43'56"CH=6.12'CHB=N43°45' 02" WL= 12. 26' R= 51. 50'= 13° 38' 39" CH= 12. 24' CHB= N07° 42' 23" WC4 N69°08'46"E15.41'L=32.47'R=70.50'=26°23' 05"CH=32.18'CHB=N33°38'24"WN46°49'56" W 57.83'S 4 3 1 0 0 4 W 1 5 4 3 L= 6. 56' R= 4. 65'= 80° 47' 23" CH= 6. 03' CHB= N84° 07' 29" WL= 32. 78' R= 24. 67'= 76° 08' 32" CH=30.42'CHB= N04°05'27"WC 3 C2L=3.17'R=65. 33'=2°47'02"CH= 3.17'CHB=S84°04'47"EC1S0° 22' 22" W15. 67' L= 53. 81' R= 84. 50'= 36° 29' 17" CHB= N72° 28' 05" ECH= 52. 91' N35° 26' 13" W15. 68' L= 6. 06' R= 4. 40'= 79° 02' 56" CH= 5. 59' CHB= N13° 44' 48" EL 3 1 3 6 R 6 5.3 3' 27° 29' 56" CHB N 3 6 39' 2 9" E C H= 31. 06'L=6.07'R=4.37'=79°40'56"CH=5.59'CHB=N59°34' 10" ES71° 14' 49" E15. 68' L= 53. 81' R= 8 4. 5 0 '= 3 6 ° 2 9 ' 1 7 " CHB= N00°50' 54 " E C H =5 2 .9 1 ' S72°56'36" W15.68' L= 5. 83'R= 5. 89'= 56° 45' 19" CH= 5. 60' CHB= N57° 52' 32" WL= 4. 61'R= 65.33'=4°02'35" CH=4. 61'CHB=N23°14'01"WL= 9.91' R=24.67'=23°01'36" CH=9.85'CHB=N13°44'27"WL=157.50'R=36.67'=246° 0 6 4 1"CHB=S73°41'37"WCH=61.4 6 L=20.90'R=8.67'=138°10'11"CH=16.19'CHB=N65°42'05"WS 4 5 1 2 4 9 W 1 3 2 9 0 L=10.23'L =6 8.39 'R =1015.33 '=3 °51'3 3 "CHB =N01°2 7 '14 " E CH= 6 8. 3 7 ' N3° 23' 00" E 15. 38' S 4 5 1 5 4 6 W 9 3 2 7 S44° 44' 14" E3. 99' S31° 27'20"W5.32'S 32 49 0 7 W 20 0 3 N57° 10' 53" W16. 15' L= 6. 24' R= 3. 67'= 97° 31'06"CH= 5.51'CHB= S74°03'34" WL=25.87' R=213. 33'=6° 56' 48"CH=25.85'CHB=S48° 15'35"ES44° 47'11"E11.34'L=13.61' R=8.67'= A M E R I C A N WI L L OW D RI V E 6 0 R O W R E C OLD VICTORY ROADNON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTTOWN OF FRASERREC # 2009- 006046GARAGE AGARAGE BBUILDING DC7S57° 10' 53" E 48. 54'L=39.55'R=186.67'=12°08'22"CHB= S51°06'43"ECH=39.48'L=6.21'R= 5. 52'= 64° 27' 19" CH= 5. 88' CHB= S68° 11' 04" WN60° 20' 39" W15. 56' L= 32. 86' R= 132. 50'= 14° 12' 41" CHB= S22° 45' 59" W CH= 32. 78' S15° 3 9 3 9 W 1 4 3 1 4 N22° 49' 58" W11. 95' L= 9. 06' R= 3. 67'= 141° 30' 23" CH= 6. 92' CHB= S86° 24' 50" WS15° 3 9 3 9 W 4 9 8 4 L= 53. 11' R= 23. 67'= 128° 35' 02" CHB= S48° 37' 52" ECH= 42. 65' N67° 04' 51" E14. 97' L= 5. 75' R= 3. 60'= 91° 24' 58" CH= 5. 16' CHB= N22°32' 50" EN22° 44' 48" W14. 51' N67° 36' 57" E 93 47 89° 33' 04" CH= 5. 17' CHB= S22° 23' 30" WS67° 36' 57" W 93 61 L=43.67'R=84.67'29°33 12CHB=S30°26'13"WCH43. 1 9 L= 19. 44' R= 8. 67'= 128° 29' 37" CH= 15. 61' CHB=S48°35'10"EN67°10'02"E122 19S 4 5 1 5 4 6 W 9 3 2 7 S44° 44' 14" E3. 99' S31° 27' 20" W5.32'S 3 2 4 9 0 7 W 20 0 3 N57° 10'53"W16.15'L=6.24'R=3.67'=97° 31' 06" CH= 5. 51' CHB= S74° 03' 34" WL= 25. 87' R= 213. 33'= 6° 56' 48" CH= 25. 85' CHB= S48° 15' 35" ES44° 47' 11" E11. 34' L= 13. 61' R=8. 67'= 90° 00' 00" CH=12. 26' CHB= S89° 47' 11" EN45° 12' 49" E5. 81' L= 5. 76' R= 3. 67'= 90° 00' 00" CH= 5. 19' CHB= N00° 12' 49" EN44° 47' 11" W16. 33' N 4 5 1 2 4 9 E 2 9 3 8 S44° 44' 14" E1. 92'L=7.89'R= 3. 67'=123°14'36" CH=6.45' CHB=S16°53' 04"WS44°44' 14"E13.36' CH=5. 80'CHB= S84° 29'09"WS 4 5 1 8 4 3 W 6 4 2 7 L 5 0.70' AMERICAN WILLOWDRIVEREC. _________________ OLD VICTORY ROADNON- EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTTOWN OF FRASERREC # 2009- 006046BUILDING BBUILDING CGARAGE ABUILDING DL= 6. 21' R= 5. 52'=64°27'19"CH=5.88'CHB=S68°11'04" WN60°20'39" W15.56'L=32.86'R=132.50'=14°12' 41" CHB= S22° 45' 59" W CH= 32. 78' S15° 3 9 3 9 W 1 4 3 1 4 N67° 04' 51" E 171 00 N22°55' 09"W16.84' L= 5. 72' R= 4.50'=72°48'01"CH=5.34'CHB=N13° 28'52"EC5S74°30'36"E15.90'L=13.66'R= 45. 50'= 17° 12' 11" CH= 13. 61' CHB= N07° 22' 50" EN1° 13' 15" W 109.17'L =7 CHN22°49'58"W11.95' L=9.06'R= 3.67'= 141°30'23"CH= 6.92' CHB= S86° 24' 50" WS15° 3939W4984 L=53.11'R= 23.67'=128° 35'02" CHB= S48° 37' 52" ECH= 42. 65' N67° 04' 51" E14. 97' L=5.75' R=3.60'=91° 24' 58" CH= 5. 16' CHB= N22° 32' 50" EN22° 44' 48"W14.51'N67°36'57"E9347 S22°55' 09" E13. 53' L= 5. 79' R= 3. 71'= 89°28' 58" CH= 5. 22' CHB= S67°23' 02" EN67° 04' 51" E7. 82 L= 28. 21'R= 23.67'=68°17'49"CH= 26.57'CHB= N32° 55' 40" EL= 5. 76' R= 3. 67'= 90° 00' 00" CH=5.19' CHB=N46° 13' 15" WS88°46' 45"W16. 33'N1° 13' 15"W 42.67' N88° 46' 45" E16. 33' L= 5. 76' R= 3. 67'= 90° 00' 00" CH= 5. 19' CHB= N43° 46' 45" EN1° 13' 15"W5.19'L=16.88'R=8. 67'=111°36'43"CH=14. 34' CHB= N57° 01' 37" WS67° 10' 02" W 42 32 L= 5.73'R= 3.67'=89° 33'04"CH= 5.17'CHB= S22°23' 30"WS22° 23' 03"E14.37'S67°36'57" W 93 61 L=43.67'R=84.67'2 9°3 3' THE WHITMER LAW FIRM, LLC  www.whitmerlawfirm.com  Physical: 63331 U.S. Hwy. 40, Granby CO 80446 Mailing: P.O. Box 38, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451 Phone 970.725.3460 Kent H. Whitmer (Kent@whitmerlawfirm.com)‡ William G. Berry (Will@whitmerlawfirm.com)† Sean C. Lemieux (Sean@whitmerlawfirm.com)◊ Valissa Tsoucaris (Valissa@whitmerlawfirm.com)◊ Kaitlin Randall (Katie@whitmerlawfirm.com)◊ ‡ Licensed in Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana † Licensed in Colorado, Wyoming, and Alabama ◊ Licensed in Colorado MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Catherine, Trotter, Fraser Town Planner FROM: THE WHITMER LAW FIRM DATE: February 17, 2022 RE: Alpenglow Subdivision FDPD Legal Review Catherine, We have reviewed the following documents from the Alpenglow Subdivision submittal: 1. Title Commitment No. 0303426-C1 dated March 10, 2021 2. Alpenglow at Grand Park Final Plan – Amendment 2 dated November 16, 2021 3. Final Plats for Alpenglow Phases 1, 2 and 3 4. Alpenglow Final Plat Application and Narrative 5. Estimated Time Schedule for Development From our review, we have the following comments and concerns. Please let us know if you would like to discuss anything in more detail. 1. The submitted checklist says that a phasing plan is not applicable, but under Code § 19-3-230(d) each phase should include anticipated recording dates of each plat, a development schedule for each phase, and a “list” of “the public improvements necessary to fully support each phase in the event subsequent phases are delayed or do not occur.” The Town also “may condition a phasing plan on the submission of an agreement to dedicate easements or rights-of-way.” The phasing plan will also necessitate findings from the PC and BOT that “the final plat phasing plan will not impede the orderly growth of public services and infrastructure necessary to efficiently serve each individual phased plat and the entire land area included within the preliminary plat approval.” None of these requirements has been fulfilled (estimated development scheduled submitted is only for Phase 1). 2. The submitted title commitment is outdated under Town Code § 19-1-410. Its legal includes Willows Filing Nos 1-3, and is for “WILLOW APARTMENTS AT GRAND PARK.” The legal Page 2 of 3 does not describe the subject parcel in the same way as the plat or plan, if it describes it at all. A new title commitment will be needed with legal descriptions matching those on the plats. 3. Also under Code § 19-3-230(d), “The final plat shall include a plat note, in form approved by the Town Attorney, which advises purchasers and owners of any lot, parcel or tract shown thereon that, while building permits may be issued prior to final completion of subdivision improve- ments, no certificate of occupancy may be issued for a structure on any lot, parcel or tract until all such improvements, as required by the SIA, have been completed and preliminarily accepted by the Town pursuant to Section 19-3-445.” The plats do not include such a note. 4. The checklist also says that the HOA documents are inapplicable, even though applicant has submitted Condominium Declarations. Missing from the submittal are Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Association as well as deeds of conveyance to the Association. 5. Plan Note 9 states that proposed open space will be owned and maintained by Grand Park De- velopment, LLC, its successors and assigns. Code § 19-4-165 (f)(2) requires that open space be publicly dedicated or conveyed to an association that will be responsible for future maintenance. Applicant has submitted Declarations for the Alpenglow Condominium Association, Inc., a Col- orado nonprofit corporation, so that entity should be substituted in Note 9. 6. The “Transit Plan” on Plan Page 12 is missing (Page 13 was included twice), but under Code § 19-4-175(d), “[w]here appropriate, covered loading and unloading access points for public transit may be required by the Planning Commission.” Page 12 should be reviewed to ensure compliance. 7. Code § 19-4-170 requires dedication of any trails to the Town by easement. Existing trails are depicted on the Plan without mention of such an easement dedication. 8. Plan Note 8 states that all drives other than American Willow Drive, Mountain Willow Drive, and Old Victory Road will be private. Code § 19-4-175(a)(3) suggests that all private streets should be conveyed to an association. Plan Note 8 should reflect road ownership by the Alpen- glow Condominium Association. 9. The submitted Subdivision Improvements Agreement does not include its Exhibits, which will need to be reviewed to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. 10. Under Annexation Agreement § 4.2, “Densities may be transferred between Planning Areas up to 30% of the receiving Planning Area with a transfer application if sufficient roadway capacity and water and sewer capacity is available, and subject to amendment of the PDD Ordinance. . . . Any density transfer to a Planning Area with an approved FPDP will require an amendment to the FPDP under the provisions of the PDD Ordinance.” Although the 2005 PDD states that no plan amendment is required if a density transfer does not exceed 30%, the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement states that any conflicting provision found in “written documents approved as part of the” PDD is trumped by the terms of the Annexation Agreement. There- Page 3 of 3 fore, references to density transfers for an additional 66 units need to be removed from the ap- plication documents until a transfer application is submitted and approved with sufficient show- ing of roadway, water, and sewer capacity, along with amendments to the PDD Ordinance and the FPDPs of The Willows at Grand Park. 11. Annexation Agreement § 10.6 states that Fraser may designate and require the conveyance of a five-acre site for a public purpose. Fraser has requested the conveyance of this site pursuant a letter from the Town Attorney dated May 29, 2015. The requested site is adjacent to Old Victory Road between the existing Cozens Meadow subdivision and Highway 40. The conveyance of this site should be a condition of approval of the FPDP. SITE SHEET OF BY DA T E # RE V I S I O N D E S C R I P T I O N 20 2 1 - 0 9 - 2 9 X: \ 1 5 - 0 0 3 M E Y E R L O T 2 - G R A N D P A R K \ C A D \ P L A N S \ S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G P L A N S - M E Y E R L O T 2 \ C D S CO V E R . D W G ME Y E R L O T 2 - U S 4 0 S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G TO W N O F F R A S E R , C O L O R A D O CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S 6 DR A F T XX X 1 XX / X X / 2 0 2 1 NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N Know what's below. Call before you dig. te r r a c i n a 10 2 0 0 E . G i r a r d A v e , A - 3 1 4 De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 1 ph : 3 0 3 . 6 3 2 . 8 8 6 7 td de s i g n CO V E R S H E E T 1 ENGINEER TERRACINA DESIGN 10200 E. GIRARD AVE., SUITE A-314 DENVER, CO 80231 303-703-4444 CONTACT: MARTIN METSKER CURRENT LAND OWNER GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY P.O. BOX 30 WINTER PARK, COLORADO 80482 PHONE: 303.972.6633 CONTACT: CLARK LIPSCOMB SURVEYOR CORE CONSULTANTS 3473 S. BROADWAY, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 PHONE: 303-703-4444 CONTACT: MIKE KERVIN GEOTECH CTL THOMPSON, INC. 1790 AIRPORT ROAD, #2 POB 4928 BRECKENRIDGE, CO 80424 PHONE: 970-453-2047 CONTACT: GEORGE BENECKE III TOWN OF FRASER P.O. BOX 370 153 FRASER AVENUE FRASER, CO 80442 PHONE: 970-726-5491 CONTACT: JEFF DURBIN CONSULTING REVIEW ENGINEER BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD 45 COUNTY ROAD 804, STE 201 FRASER, COLORADO 80442 PHONE: 970-818-2148 CONTACT: TIM GAGNON EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #4 POB 2967 WINTER PARK, COLORADO 80482 PHONE: 970-726-5824 CONTACT: TODD HOLZWARTH MOUNTAIN PARKS ELECTRIC POB 170 GRANBY, CO 80446 PHONE: 970-887-3378 CONTACT: TODD CLAUSEN XCEL ENERGY PHONE: 970-262-4055 CONTACT: KATHLEEN JACOBY CENTURY LINK PHONE: 970-879-3661 CONTACT A:NATASIA KENNER COMCAST POB 785 GRANBY, CO 80446 PHONE: 970-887-2676 CONTACT: TONY HILDRET UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO 2801 S YOUNGFIELD ST, SUITE 301 GOLDEN, CO 80401 PHONE: 811 TOWN OF FRASER APPROVAL BLOCK THESE DESIGNS, PLANS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE REVIEWED FOR CONCEPT AND GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE TOWN'S MINIMUM STANDARDS ONLY, AND THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DESIGN ADEQUACY SHALL REMAIN WITH THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THIS REVIEW DOES NOT IMPLY RESPONSIBILITY BY EITHER THE TOWN OF FRASER OR THE TOWN'S ENGINEER FOR COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY OR CORRECTNESS OF CALCULATIONS. THE REVIEW DOES NOT IMPLY THAT QUANTITIES OF ITEMS INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE THE FINAL QUANTITIES REQUIRED. THE REVIEW SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED FOR ANY REASON AS ACCEPTANCE OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY BY THE TOWN OF FRASER OR ANY OF THE REVIEWING PARTIES FOR ADDITIONAL ITEMS AND ADDITIONAL QUANTITIES OF ITEMS SHOWN THAT MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE EARLIEST OF THESE BY:_________________________________________________ TOWN OF FRASER DATE BY:_________________________________________________ TOWN OF FRASER DATE BY:_________________________________________________ EAST GRAND F.P.D #4 DATE ENGINEERS STATEMENT THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR MEYER LOT 2 - US 40 SANITARY CROSSING WERE PREPARED BY ME UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE STANDARDS. BY: MARTIN METSKER DATE BASIS OF BEARING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN WHICH WAS ASSUMED TO BEAR S00°14'02"E. BENCHMARK STATEMENT N.G.S. CONTROL POINT "N139" PID KK08971. THE STATION IS LOCATED 2.4 MILES BY ROAD, NORTH OF FRASER, BETWEEN THE RAILROAD AND U.S. HIGHWAY 40. NGVD 29 DATUM ELEVATION = 8433.78 CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR MEYER LOT 2 - US 40 SANITARY CROSSING TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO TERRACINA PROJECT NO. 15-003 0 400'800' 1 inch = 400 ft. VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX SHEET #SHEET TITLE 1 COVER SHEET 2 GENERAL NOTES 3 OVERALL SITE AND STRIPING PLAN 4 SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 5 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN AND PVC DETAIL 6 MANHOLE DETAILS SHEET OF BY DA T E # RE V I S I O N D E S C R I P T I O N 20 2 1 - 0 9 - 2 9 X: \ 1 5 - 0 0 3 M E Y E R L O T 2 - G R A N D P A R K \ C A D \ P L A N S \ S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G P L A N S - M E Y E R L O T 2 \ C D S CO V E R . D W G ME Y E R L O T 2 - U S 4 0 S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G TO W N O F F R A S E R , C O L O R A D O CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S 6 DR A F T XX X 1 XX / X X / 2 0 2 1 NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N Know what's below. Call before you dig. te r r a c i n a 10 2 0 0 E . G i r a r d A v e , A - 3 1 4 De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 1 ph : 3 0 3 . 6 3 2 . 8 8 6 7 td de s i g n GE N E R A L N O T E S 2 GENERAL NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMPTLY NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF ANY PROBLEMS OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS IN CONFORMING TO THE DESIGN LINE AND GRADE FOR ANY ELEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMPTLY NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF SITE CONDITIONS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. 2.ALL MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SET FORTH IN THE LATEST MUNICIPAL CODE, APPLICABLE TECHNICAL MANUALS, AND APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. WHERE THERE IS CONFLICT BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND THE TECHNICAL MANUAL OR ANY APPLICABLE STANDARDS, THE MORE STRINGENT STANDARD SHALL APPLY. ALL WORK SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. 3.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED UPON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE EXISTENCE AND/OR LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND PARTICIPATE IN THE RESOLUTION OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 4.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE LOCAL UTILITY LOCATION CENTER AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATIONS OF THE UTILITIES. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PERTINENT LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS, ESPECIALLY AT CONNECTION POINTS AND AT POTENTIAL UTILITY CONFLICTS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COOPERATE WITH THE TOWN AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INVOLVED WITH REGARD TO RELOCATIONS OR ADJUSTMENTS OF EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TO ASSURE THAT THE WORK IS ACCOMPLISHED IN A TIMELY FASHION AND WITH A MINIMUM DISRUPTION OF SERVICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL PARTIES AFFECTED BY ANY DISRUPTION OF ANY UTILITY SERVICE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEVENTY-TWO (72) HOURS NOTICE TO THE ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR PRIOR TO MAKING ANY CONNECTIONS/TIE-INS TO EXISTING WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND/OR STORM SEWER SYSTEMS PROVIDED THAT THE UTILITY TIE-IN DOES NOT DISRUPT SERVICE TO EXISTING WATER CUSTOMERS. ALL TOWN UTILITY TIE-INS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE WATER PROVIDER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ONE (1) SIGNED COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS, ONE (1) COPY OF THE APPROPRIATE CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND A COPY OF ANY PERMITS AND EXTENSION AGREEMENTS NEEDED FOR THE JOB ONSITE AT ALL TIMES. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASPECTS OF SAFETY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EXCAVATION, TRENCHING, SHORING, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND SECURITY. 9.IF DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED WHICH COULD INDICATE A SITUATION THAT IS NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR IMMEDIATELY. 10.ALL REFERENCES TO ANY PUBLISHED STANDARDS SHALL REFER TO THE LATEST REVISION OF SAID STANDARD UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD TO THE APPROPRIATE RIGHT-OF-WAY AUTHORITY (TOWN, COUNTY OR STATE) FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN OR AFFECTING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ANY AND ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 12.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE INTENDED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS OR AS DESIGNATED TO BE PROVIDED, INSTALLED, OR CONSTRUCTED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING AS-BUILT INFORMATION ON A SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS KEPT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND AVAILABLE TO THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR AT ALL TIMES. 14.DIMENSIONS FOR LAYOUT AND CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT TO BE SCALED FROM ANY DRAWING. IF PERTINENT DIMENSIONS ARE NOT SHOWN, CONTACT THE CONSULTANT ENGINEER FOR CLARIFICATION AND ANNOTATE THE DIMENSION ON THE AS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS. 15.ALL INITIAL SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL (TESC) PLAN PRIOR TO ANY EARTH-DISTURBING ACTIVITY. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE MAINTAINED IN EFFECTIVE OPERATING CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. REMOVAL OF CONTROL MEASURES SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE STORMWATER INSPECTOR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING ROADWAYS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND DIRT TRACKED FROM THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE COLORADO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES. 16.NO PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY ARE LOCATED WITHIN A DESIGNATED 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN ZONE PER FEMA FIRM PANEL NO. 08035C0167G DATED MARCH 16, 2016. 17.THE PROJECT BENCHMARK SHALL HAVE A PUBLISHED NAVD88 ELEVATION. I.E. NGS BENCHMARKS OR DOUGLAS COUNTY CONTROL POINTS. IN ADDITION TO THE PROJECT BENCHMARK, ANY ON-SITE BENCHMARKS SHOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR CONTRACTOR USE. 18.ALL UTILITIES ARE REVIEWED FOR AREA OF PLACEMENT (LOCATION) INCLUDING, IN EASEMENT/ROW, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CLEARANCES, AND CONFLICTS WITH OTHER UTILITIES PER THE TRANSPORTATION DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL, WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL, WASTEWATER DESIGN CRITERIA MANUAL, STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN AND TECHNICAL CRITERIA MANUAL, AND ALL OTHER UTILITY OWNER AND OPERATOR CRITERIA. 19.ALL UTILITY CUTS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH FLOWABLE FILL UP TO SUBGRADE. EDGE MILL REQUIRED AROUND PERIMETER OF SAWCUT. MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT DEPTH. COORDINATE WITH PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR PER CDOT REQUIREMENTS. 20.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING SAFE, PASSABLE ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO THE WORK THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION. 21.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE JOB SITE CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROTECTION OF PROPERTY. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED ONLY TO WORKING HOURS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER AND THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION HARMLESS FOR ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK, EXCEPT FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER OR THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION. 22.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING NEARBY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREETS OF MUD AND DEBRIS, DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ON A DAILY BASIS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE APPLICANT. STREET CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMPTLY NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF ANY PROBLEMS OR POTENTIAL PROBLEMS IN CONFORMING TO THE DESIGN LINE AND GRADE FOR ANY ELEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMPTLY NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER OF SITE CONDITIONS THAT DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. 2.ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE TOWN OF FRASER STREET AND ROADWAY MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS DATED JANUARY 2015. 3.ALL STREET CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL NOTES ON THE COVER SHEET OF THESE PLANS AS WELL AS THE STREET CONSTRUCTION NOTES LISTED HERE. 4.WHERE PROPOSED PAVING ADJOINS EXISTING ASPHALT, THE EXISTING ASPHALT SHALL BE SAW CUT A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 12" FROM THE EXISTING EDGE TO CREATE A CLEAN CONSTRUCTION JOINT. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT TO A DISTANCE WHERE A CLEAN CONSTRUCTION JOINT CAN BE MADE. 5.STREET SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12" AND RE-COMPACTED PRIOR TO SUB-BASE INSTALLATION. NO BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE LAID UNTIL THE SUBGRADE HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. 6.VALVE BOXES ARE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO GRADE AT THE TIME OF PAVEMENT PLACEMENT OR OVERLAY. VALVE BOX ADJUSTING RINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED. 7.ALL STREET CUTS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH FLOWABLE FILL, PERIMETER SHALL BE SAW CUT AND EDGE MILLED PER CDOT REQUIREMENTS. 8.LIFTS IN FILL AREAS SHALL NOT EXCEED 8 INCHES IN COMPACTED DEPTH. MAXIMUM SLOPES OF ALL CUTS & FILLS SHALL BE 3:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FILL SHALL NOT BE PLACED ON EXISTING TOPSOIL OR ORGANIC MATERIAL. TOPSOIL AND ORGANIC MATERIAL SHALL BE STRIPPED AND REMOVED FROM THE FILL AREA AND NOT USED IN THE FILL. FILL SHALL ONLY BE PLACED ON SUITABLE EXISTING SUBGRADE FREE OF ANY TOPSOIL AND/OR ORGANIC MATERIAL. 9.PAVING SHALL NOT START UNTIL SUBGRADE COMPACTION TESTS ARE TAKEN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANS AND SPECS AND FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN.THE PAVEMENT SECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR THS PROJECT. THE MINIMUM DEPTH OF ASPHALT SHALL BE 5-INCHES. 10.ASPHALT PAVING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TOWN OF FRASER ROAD STANDARDS FINAL ASPHALT THICKNESS AND BASE COURSE THICKNESS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOIL'S ENGINEER'S REPORT. 11.ROADWAY BASE COURSE AND FILL AREA COMPACTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE TOWN OF FRASER ROAD STANDARDS. THE BASE COURSE AND COMPACTION SHALL ALSO CONFORM TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 12.AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION, AS PART OF THE PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE, THE TOWN WILL SELECT REPRESENTATIVE LOCATIONS TO TAKE ASPHALT CORINGS AS CONFIRMATION OF ASPHALT DEPTH AND CONSISTENCY OF THE ASPHALT SECTION. THE TOWN WILL CONTRACT DIRECTLY WITH A COMPANY TO PERFORM THIS WORK AND WILL BACK CHARGE THE DEVELOPER FOR THE COST. STORM SEWER NOTES: 1.LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER (INCLUDING CULVERTS) SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 2.STORM SEWER SHALL BE RCP IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT STANDARD M-603-2. 3.ALL CULVERTS SHALL HAVE END SECTIONS ON BOTH THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE PIPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 4.STORM SEWER RCP SHALL HAVE BEDDING AND BACKFILL IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT STANDARD M-603-2 AND TOWN OF FRASER ROAD STANDARDS. 5.PIPE LENGTHS FOR STORM SEWER ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL DISTANCES FROM END SECTION TO END SECTION. THEREFORE, DISTANCES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND COULD VARY. END SECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE PIPE LENGTH SHOWN ON THE PLANS. FINAL LENGTH OF STORM SEWER SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE THE ROAD SHOULDERS AND SIDE SLOPES TO NOT BE STEEPER THAN SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL ROAD SECTION. 6.DRIVEWAYS FOR ADJACENT PARCELS AND CULVERTS UNDER THE DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE DESIGNED IN THE FUTURE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGNS FOR THE ADJACENT PARCELS. 7.ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 24" UNLESS LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE PROVIDED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL ANY PIPE HAVE LESS THAN 18" COVER FROM THE FINISH SURFACE TO THE OUTSIDE WALL OF THE PIPE. 8.ALL STORM DRAINAGE TRENCHES SHALL BE SLOPED OR BRACED AND SHEETED AS NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PROTECTION OF OTHER UTILITIES AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. ALL EXCAVATION OPERATION SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9.ALL MANHOLE RIM ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THESE PLANS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET THE FINAL RIM ELEVATION BASED ON THE COMPLETED FINISH SURFACE. SINAGE AND STRIPPING NOTES: 1.ALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING IS SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL NOTES ON THE COVER SHEET OF THESE PLANS AS WELL AS THE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES LISTED HERE. 2.ALL PAINT SHALL BE 15 MIL THICK UPON INSTALLATION AND 8MIL THICK WHEN DRY. 3.ALL PERMANENT LONGITUDINAL PAVEMENT STRIPING ON ASPHALT SURFACES (CENTERLINES, LANE LINES, BAY LINES, ETC.) SHALL BE INSTALLED USING AN APPROVED REFLECTIVE TRAFFIC PAINT OR PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE. REFLECTIVE BEADS SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION AND THE MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS. WHEN TAPE IS USED ON AN ASPHALT STREET, IT SHALL BE “ROLLED” INTO THE FINAL LIFT. ON CONCRETE SURFACES TAPE SHALL BE UTILIZED WITH A CONTRASTING BLACK EDGE AND GROOVED INTO THE PAVEMENT. 4.THERMO-PLASTIC APPLICATIONS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS AND/OR PER TOWN CRITERIA. 5.ALL SURFACES THAT ACCEPT PAINT/THERMO-PLASTIC STRIPING OR PRE-FORMED MARKINGS SHALL BE FIRST SANDBLASTED AND THOROUGHLY CLEANED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF STRIPING OR MARKINGS. 6.ALL ARROW MARKINGS SHALL BE PRE-FORMED TAPE, THERMO-PLASTIC OR EPOXY-PAINTED. 7.STOP BARS SHALL BE 90 MIL THERMO-PLASTIC. 8.ALL ROADWAY SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE MUTCD AND/OR THE TOWN'S CRITERIA. 9.ALL SIGNPOSTS SHALL UTILIZE BREAK AWAY ASSEMBLIES AND FASTENERS. FIRE NOTES: 1.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TO MAINTAIN DRIVE LANES FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE INGRESS AND EGRESS, INCLUDING SNOW REMOVAL. 2.EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD IS REQUIRED TO ALLOW ACCESS WITHIN 150' OF ALL EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING BY AN APPROVED ROUTE. 3.FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND MAINTAINED TO SUPPORT THE IMPOSED LOADS OF FIRES APPARATUS AND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SURFACE SO AS TO PROVIDE ALL-WEATHER DRIVING CAPABILITIES. ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE EITHER CONCRETE, ASPHALT, OR OTHER APPROVED ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL ACCOMPANIED WITH AN ENGINEER'S STAMP STATING THE MATERIAL WILL SUPPORT A 75,000 POUND IMPOSED LOAD. 4.FIRE HYDRANT(S) ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED AND MADE SERVICEABLE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS BEING BROUGHT ONTO THE SITE AND DURING THE TIME OF VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION. 5.“NO PARKING FIRE LANE” SIGNS ARE REQUIRED IN AREAS THAT MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AND IN AREAS DESIGNATED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU. SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON BOTH SIDES OF FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAYS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRIVEWAYS LESS THAN 26 FEET WIDE. SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON ONE SIDE ONLY OF FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAYS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAYS OR DRIVEWAYS BETWEEN 26 FEET WIDE AND 32 FEET WIDE. NO SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED FOR ACCESS ROADWAY FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAYS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAYS OR DRIVEWAYS EXCEEDING 32 FEET WIDE. 6.WHEN FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS OR A WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED, SUCH PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MADE SERVICEABLE PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS BEING BROUGHT ONTO THE SITE AND THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION GOING VERTICAL. SANITARY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FRASER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA. 2.ALL MANHOLE RIM ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THESE PLANS ARE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET THE FINAL RIM ELEVATION BASED ON THE COMPLETE FINISH SURFACE. 3.ALL SANITARY SEWER LINE TRENCHES SHALL BE SLOPED OR BRACED AND SHEETED AS NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PROTECTION OF OTHER UTILITIES, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. ALL EXCAVATION OPERATION SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 4.MINIMUM COVER FOR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE 5 FEET AND THE MINIMUM SLOPE SHALL BE 2.0%. 5.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE SHORTEST AND STRAIGHTEST ROUTE POSSIBLE. 6.SIZING/CAPACITY. THE SIZE AND SLOPE OF THE BUILDING SERVICE SEWER SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE TOWN, BUT IN NO EVENT SHALL THE DIAMETER BE LESS THAN FOUR (4) INCHES. MINIMUM GRADE AND SLOPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: , 4" 2.0% NORMAL; 1.0% MINIMUM, 6" 1.00%, 8" 0.60%. 7.WHERE PARALLEL OR APPROXIMATELY PARALLEL TO A STRUCTURAL WALL, THE SERVICE LINE SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE WALL. PENETRATIONS THROUGH STRUCTURES SHALL BE AT RIGHT ANGLES, OR CLOSE THERETO, THROUGH PVC SLEEVES AND SHALL PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY SUCH THAT THE SERVICE LINE WILL NOT BE DAMAGED BY SETTLMENT OF THE STRUCTURES. 8.SEWER AND WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL HAVE TEN (10) FEET MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE OF PIPE. WHERE THIS SEPARATION IS IMPRACTICAL, THE TOWN MAY PERMIT OTHER SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS. IF A WATER LINE PASSES WITHIN EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES VERTICAL DISTANCE ABOVE A SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE OR IF IT LIES WITHIN THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE OF THE SEWER MAIN OR SERVICE, THE SEWER SERVICE IS TO BE MODIFIED TO HAVE "NO BELL" CONSTRUCTION PER ATTACHMENT A-23 – PIPE CROSSING DETAIL. IF A WATER LINE CROSSES UNDER A SEWER SERVICE, A TWENTY-FOOT LENGTH OF C900 PVC SHALL BE USED FOR THE GRAVITY SEWER LINE. SMITH-BLAIR 229, FULL CIRCLE COLLAR LEAK REPAIR CLAMPS, SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL SANITARY SEWER JOINTS WITHIN THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS, AND NO WATER LINE PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT. 9.THE MINIMUM COVER SHALL BE SEVEN (7) FEET FROM TOP OF SEWER SERVICE LINE TO FINISHED GRADE. SERVICE LINES WITH LESS THAN SEVEN (7) FEET OF COVER WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE TOWN WITH INSTALLATION OF TWO (2) INCHES OF PIPELINE INSULATION INSTALLED FOR EVERY ONE (1) FOOT OF COVER LESS THAN SEVEN (7) FEET. THE TOWN SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL LOCATIONS WHERE PIPE DEPTHS ARE LESS THAN SEVEN (7) FEET. IN NO CASE SHALL A SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE HAVE A DEPTH LESS THAN FIVE (5) FEET. SERVICE LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS PER ATTACHMENT A-38 – SEWER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE BEDDING & BACKFILL DETAIL. 10.WYE TAP SADDLES SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR CONNECTION OF EACH SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE TO THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE. PRE-INSTALLED WYE FITTINGS MAY BE ALLOWED ON NEW SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE CONSTRUCTION, AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO SADDLES, FOR CONNECTION OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINES TO THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE WITH PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE TOWN. 11.WARNING TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE TRENCH ABOVE THE SEWER LINE. THE WARNING TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED CONTINUOUSLY ABOVE THE SEWER LINE, A DISTANCE OF THIRTY (30) INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE. THE WARNING TAPE SHALL BE THREE (3) INCHES WIDE, GREEN IN COLOR WITH THE LEGEND "CAUTION BURIED SEWER LINE BELOW" IN BLACK AND EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY IN THE TRENCH. IF ANY EXISTING WARNING TAPE IS DAMAGED IN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, A SPLICE SHALL BE MADE USING ADDITIONAL WARNING TAPE TIED TO EACH END TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS WARNING TAPE ALONG THE SEWER LINE. WARNING TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON SEWER SERVICE LINES FROM THE TAP AT THE MAIN TO THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENT AND/OR CLEANOUTS. 12.EACH SERVICE LINE IS TO HAVE A FOUR-INCH CLEANOUT INSTALLED WITHIN TWENTY (20) FEET OF THE BUILDING SERVED, PER ATTACHMENT A-42 – SEWER SERVICE LINE CONNECTION DETAIL, ATTACHMENT A-43 SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUT DETAIL – UNPAVED LOCATION AND ATTACHMENT A-44 – SEWER CLEANOUT COLLAR DETAIL – PAVED LOCATION. CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY FORTY-FIVE-DEGREE BEND IN SERVICE LINE DIRECTION AND AT INTERVALS OF NO GREATER THAN NINETY (90) FEET. 13.CLEANOUTS LOCATED WITHIN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE RAISED TO FINAL GRADE WITH EITHER ASPHALT SURFACING INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE CLEANOUT OR WITH A CONCRETE COLLAR. IF THE CLEANOUT IS SET AT FINAL GRADE DURING THE ASPHALT PAVING PROCESS, THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE SHALL BE FOLLOWED: 13.1.INSTALLATION OF THE BOTTOM LIFT OF ASPHALT SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE CLEANOUT. 13.2.THE CLEANOUT SHALL BE EXPOSED AND SET TO ITS FINAL GRADE AT ONE-HALF (½) INCH LOWER THAN THE GRADE OF THE FINAL ASPHALT SURFACE. ANY VOID CREATED IN THE BOTTOM LIFT OF ASPHALT BY EXPOSING AND RAISING THE CLEANOUT SHALL BE FILLED WITH COMPACTED HOT MIX ASPHALT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE OF THE TOP LIFT OF ASPHALT. 13.3.INSTALLATION OF THE TOP LIFT OF ASPHALT SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED, MAINTAINING THE REQUIRED VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE PAVEMENT SURFACE TO THE TOP OF THE CLEANOUT. THE CLEANOUT SHALL REMAIN VERTICAL AND PLUMB. 13.4.IF A CONCRETE COLLAR IS THE SELECTED METHOD USED TO RAISE THE CLEANOUT TO FINAL GRADE, IT SHALL BE INSTALLED AFTER THE TOP LIFT OF ASPHALT IS PLACED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT A-43 – SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUT COLLAR DETAIL – UNPAVED LOCATION AND ATTACHMENT A-44 – SEWER CLEANOUT COLLAR DETAIL - PAVED LOCATION. 14.SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE PVC AND SHALL EITHER BE SDR 26 OR C900 PIPE. WHERE A DIFFERENT PIPE MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED AT THE CONNECTION POINT TO THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN, A FLEXIBLE COUPLER SHALL BE USED. THE FLEXIBLE COUPLER SHALL BE MADE OF AN ELASTOMERIC COMPOUND AND SHALL BE CONNECTED AT EACH END WITH A STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP. THE COUPLER SHALL BE LEAK-PROOF, ROOT-PROOF AND RESISTANT TO CHEMICALS, UV RAYS AND NORMAL SEWER GASSES. 15.THE COUPLER SHALL BE: 15.1.FERNCO, PART NO. 1051-44 15.2.US PIPE CORP., PART NO. 30552 15.3.AN APPROVED EQUAL 16.WHEN PRE-APPROVED BY THE TOWN, WHERE SEWER SERVICE LINES OF TWO (2) DIFFERENT PIPE TYPES ARE BEING CONNECTED TOGETHER, THE WATERTIGHT CONNECTOR FITTING SHALL BE A MANUFACTURED FITTING SPECIFICALLY FOR CONNECTION OF THAT SIZE AND TYPE OF PIPE. 17.INTERCEPTORS. GREASE INTERCEPTORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS IN THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE TOWN AND THIS CODE. GREASE INTERCEPTOR LAYOUT AND DETAIL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION. 18.SEPARATORS. OIL AND SAND SEPARATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS IN THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE TOWN AND THIS CODE. OIL AND SAND SEPARATOR LAYOUT AND DETAIL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE TOWN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION. (ORD.389 PART 1.1, 2012) WATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.ALL WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL NOTES ON THE COVER SHEET OF THESE PLANS AS WELL AS THE WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION NOTES LISTED HEREIN. 2.ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE BEDDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN STANDARDS. 3.DISTANCES FOR WATER LINES ARE HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM THE CENTER OF THE FITTING TO CENTER OF THE FITTING. THEREFORE, DISTANCES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND COULD VARY DUE TO VERTICAL ALIGNMENT AND FITTING DIMENSIONS. 4.WATER LINE TRENCHES SHALL BE SLOPED OR BRACED AND SHEETED AS NECESSARY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PROTECTION OF OTHER UTILITIES, IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. FOR ALL EXCAVATION OPERATIONS, SAFETY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5.MAXIMUM DEFLECTION FOR WATER MAINS SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE-HALF OF THE MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION OR 2.5 DEGREES, WHICHEVER IS LESS. 6.SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER ATTACHMENT A-34 – WATER SERVICE LINE AND CURB STOP AND ATTACHMENT A-35 – WATER METER ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION. NO CONNECTION BETWEEN THE WATER SYSTEM OF THE TOWN AND THE WATER FACILITIES OF THE OWNER MAY BE MADE EXCEPT IN A PUBLIC STREET ADEQUATE TO ACCOMMODATE THIS CONNECTION OR IN A LOCATION WHICH PROVIDES ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR TOWN PERSONNEL AND WHICH IS SUITABLE FOR BURIED PIPES. 7.WHERE PARALLEL OR APPROXIMATELY PARALLEL TO A STRUCTURAL WALL, THE SERVICE LINE SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET FROM THE WALL. PENETRATIONS THROUGH STRUCTURES SHALL BE AT RIGHT ANGLES, OR CLOSE THERETO, THROUGH PVC SLEEVES, AND SHALL PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY SUCH THAT THE SERVICE LINE WILL NOT BE DAMAGED BY SETTLEMENT OF THE STRUCTURES. 8.THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE LAID AT UNIFORM GRADE AND IN STRAIGHT ALIGNMENT. A REFERENCE MARK SHALL BE PLACED ON THE CURB ABOVE THE SERVICE LINE. 9.WATER AND SEWER SERVICE LINES SHALL HAVE TEN (10) FEET MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE. WHERE THIS SEPARATION IS IMPRACTICAL, THE TOWN MAY PERMIT OTHER SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS. IF A WATER SERVICE LINE CROSSES A SEWER MAIN OR SEWER SERVICE, THE WATER LINE SHALL BE PROTECTED PER ATTACHMENT A-23 – PIPE CROSSING DETAIL. 10.THE MINIMUM COVER SHALL BE NINE (9) FEET FROM THE TOP OF THE WATER SERVICE LINE TO THE FINISHED GRADE. A MINIMUM OF SEVEN (7) FEET OF COVER WILL BE ALLOWED IF AT LEAST TWO (2) INCHES OF APPROVED PIPELINE INSULATION IS PROVIDED PER VERTICAL FOOT OF COVER LESS THAN NINE (9) FEET. THE INSULATION INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATTACHMENT A-18 – WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE BEDDING AND BACKFILL DETAIL AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION 14-3-260(B). 11.WARNING TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE TRENCH CONTINUOUSLY ABOVE THE WATER LINE, A DISTANCE OF THIRTY (30) INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE. THE WARNING TAPE SHALL BE THREE (3) INCHES WIDE, BLUE IN COLOR WITH THE LEGEND "CAUTION BURIED WATER LINE BELOW" IN BLACK AND EXTEND CONTINUOUSLY IN THE TRENCH. IF ANY EXISTING WARNING TAPE IS DAMAGED IN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, A SPLICE SHALL BE MADE USING ADDITIONAL WARNING TAPE TIED TO EACH END TO PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS WARNING TAPE ALONG THE WATER LINE. WARNING TAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON WATER SERVICE LINES FROM THE TAP AT THE MAIN TO THE EDGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENT AND/OR SHUT-OFF/CURB STOP. 12.CROSS-CONNECTIONS OF ANY TYPE THAT PERMIT A BACKFLOW CONDITION FROM ANY SOURCE OTHER THAN THE TOWN'S POTABLE WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A TESTABLE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE IN PLACE OF THE TYPE COMMENSURATE WITH THE DEGREE OF HEALTH HAZARD POSED. EACH CROSS-CONNECTION MAY REQUIRE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE BASED ON THE DEGREE OF HAZARD POSED AS DETERMINED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN. 13.EACH USER OF THE TOWN WATER SYSTEM SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN TESTABLE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES ON POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SERVICE CONNECTIONS, AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 12 OF THE COLORADO PRIMARY DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS, (5 CCR 1003-1). ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITHIN THE WATER SYSTEM MUST COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 12, COLORADO CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL AND THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, AS ADOPTED BY THE TOWN. 14.ANY HAZARDOUS CROSS-CONNECTION DISCOVERED SHALL BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY UPON NOTICE OR THE WATER SERVICE WILL BE SHUT OFF. 15.ALL NEW WATER SERVICE INSTALLATIONS WILL BE INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THESE BACKFLOW PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS. 16.ALL SERVICES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE (PRV). THE PRV SHALL BE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE WATER METER AND BE SET FOR A DOWNSTREAM PRESSURE NOT EXCEEDING SEVENTY (70) PSIG. 17.WATER SERVICE PIPELINE. THE WATER SERVICE PIPELINE SHALL BE TYPE K, SOFT COPPER CONFORMING TO ASTM B88, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE TOWN. FITTINGS SHALL BE BRASS OR COPPER ALLOY. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE BY COMPRESSION TYPE FITTINGS. FLARED FITTINGS ARE PROHIBITED AND SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. SOLDERED JOINTS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNDERGROUND. SPLICE JOINTS ARE DISCOURAGED IN ALL WATER SERVICE LINE INSTALLATIONS. 18.THE TOWN MAY ALLOW THE USE OF POLYETHYLENE PIPE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER SERVICE LINES AS PROVIDED BY THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE AS ADOPTED BY THE TOWN. ALL USERS OF POLYETHYLENE PIPE FOR WATER SERVICES ARE ADVISED THAT THIS MATERIAL IS NOT CONDUCIVE TO LINE THAWING PROCEDURES IN THE EVENT THAT THE SERVICE LINE FREEZES. 19.CORPORATION STOPS. CORPORATION STOPS SHALL BE USED FOR THE CONNECTION OF SERVICES, TWO (2) INCHES AND SMALLER, TO THE WATER MAIN. CORPORATION STOPS SHALL BE BRASS AND CONFORM TO AWWA C800. THE INLET SHALL BE STANDARD AWWA CORPORATION STOP INLET THREAD, AND THE OUTLET SHALL BE FOR COMPRESSION TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE PIPE. CORPORATION STOPS SHALL BE MUELLER H-15000, FORD F- 600, OR APPROVED EQUAL, PROVIDED WITH AN INSULATING COUPLING FOR POTABLE SERVICE. 20.CURB STOPS. CURB STOPS SHALL BE PLACED PER ATTACHMENT A-34 – WATER SERVICE LINE AND CURB STOP FOR ALL SERVICES TWO (2) INCHES AND SMALLER. CURB STOPS SHALL BE BRASS AND CONFORM TO AWWA C800. CONNECTIONS SHALL BE FOR COMPRESSION TYPE "K" COPPER SERVICE PIPE. CURB STOPS SHALL BE MUELLER H-15204, FORD B-22 OR APPROVED EQUAL. CURB STOP OPERATING NUT SHALL BE EXTENDED AS NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATOR EXTENSION TO BE LOCATED TWENTY-FOUR (24) INCHES TO THIRTY-SIX (36) INCHES FROM THE TOP OF THE STOP BOX. STOP BOXES SHALL HAVE THE BASE SECTION AND LID CONSTRUCTED OF CAST IRON WITH AN ADJUSTABLE STEEL UPPER SECTION. A BRONZE SPRING FRICTION RING ASSEMBLY SHALL PROVIDE A SEAL BETWEEN THE UPPER AND BASE SECTION AND PROVIDE ONE (1) FOOT OF ADJUSTMENT. 21.SERVICE SADDLES. SERVICE SADDLES SHALL BE USED FOR ALL WATER TAPS ON ANY PIPE OTHER THAN DIP (DUCTILE IRON PIPE). FOR DIP, THREE-QUARTER-INCH TAPS MAY BE MADE WITHOUT USING A SERVICE SADDLE ON SIX-INCH PIPE. THREE-QUARTER-INCH AND ONE-INCH-SIZE TAPS MAY BE MADE WITHOUT SERVICE SADDLES ON EIGHT-INCH SIZE OF PIPE OR LARGER. ALL OTHER DIP TAPS SHALL BE MADE WITH A DOUBLE STRAP BRONZE SADDLE, SMITH BLAIR NO. 357, ROCKWELL NO. 323 OR APPROVED EQUAL. NO EROSION CONTROL PROVIDED IN PLAN SET - PLEASE PROVIDE IN FOLLOWING PLAN SET DOUGLAS COUNTY? REVISE TO TOWN OF FRASER BM AS SHOWN ON COVER SHEET FIRM PANEL PROVIDED IS FOR CASTLE ROCK, NOT FRASER PROPOSED SANITARY SEE SHEET 4 US H I G H W A Y 4 0 FR A S E R R I V E R T R A I L SE C O N D A R Y A C C E S S T O S A F E W A Y EXISTING PARKING LOT OL D V I C T O R Y R D EXISTING SEWER & WATER EASEMENT REC. NO. 2005005382 CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW CDOT STANDARD DETAIL FOR TRENCH WIDTH AND ASPHALT REMOVAL SEE NOTE 1 CAUTION!!! UTILITY CROSSING SEE NOTE 3 CAUTION!!! UTILITY CROSSING SEE NOTE 3 CAUTION!!! OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING DIRT ROAD EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT EXISTING SOLID WHITE LINE EXISTING YELLOW LINE EXISTING DOUBLE SOLID YELLOW LINE EXISTING DASHED WHITE LINE EXISTING SOLID WHITE LINE EXISTING EDGE OF ASPHALT EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT (TYP) EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING GATE VALVE (TYP) EXISTING WOOD FENCE EXISTING LIGHT POLE ( TYP) EXISTING ELEVATED PLANTER MEDIAN EXISTING GAS LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE EXISTING BUILDING 85 8 5 8 5 9 0 85 9 5 85 8 6 8 5 8 7 85 8 8 8 5 8 9 8 5 9 18591859 1 8592 8 5 9 3 85 9 4 85 9 6 8597 85 8 5 8 5 9 0 8 5 8 6 8 5 8 7 8 5 8 8 8 5 8 9 8580 8581 858 2 858 3 85 8 4 858 0 8585 85 8 1 8582 8583 8584 8590 8 5 9 5 85 8 9 8591 8592 8593 85 9 4 8 5 9 6 8 5 9 7 85 9 8 85 9 5 8600 8592 8592 8593 8594 859 6 8 5 9 7 859 8 8 5 9 9 STRC-2, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8583.50 INV. IN (21") = 8573.10 (E) INV. OUT (21") = 8573.10 (NW) MH DEPTH = 10.40' STRC-19, INSTALL NEW MANHOLE ON EX. 21" PVC SANITARY LINE 4' DIA MH RIM = 8587.00 INV. IN (15") = 8575.65 (S) INV. IN (21") = 8575.47 (E) INV. OUT (21") = 8575.47 (W) MH DEPTH = 11.53' 133.36' - EX 21" PVC @ 1.73% 258.57' - EX 21" PVC @ 1.73% STRC-1, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8595.00 INV. IN (21") = 8588.10 (E) INV. OUT (21") = 8580.00 (W) MH DEPTH = 15.00' STRC-21, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8590.17 INV. IN (8") = 8581.77 (SE) INV. OUT (21") = 8581.57 (W) MH DEPTH = 8.60' 213.02' - EX 8" PVC @ 1.44% STRC-18, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8594.49 INV. IN (15") = 8585.69 (S) INV. OUT (15") = 8584.89 (N) INV. OUT (8") = 8584.89 (NW) MH DEPTH = 9.60' 238.99' - EX 15" PVC @ 0.74% 233.58' - 15" PVC @ 3.96% STRC-17, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8595.98 INV. IN (21") = 8587.58 (E) INV. OUT (15") = 8587.48 (N) MH DEPTH = 8.50' SHEET OF BY DA T E # RE V I S I O N D E S C R I P T I O N 20 2 1 - 0 9 - 2 9 X: \ 1 5 - 0 0 3 M E Y E R L O T 2 - G R A N D P A R K \ C A D \ P L A N S \ S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G P L A N S - M E Y E R L O T 2 \ C D S OV E R A L L S I T E & S T R I P I N G . D W G ME Y E R L O T 2 - U S 4 0 S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G TO W N O F F R A S E R , C O L O R A D O CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S 6 DR A F T XX X 1 XX / X X / 2 0 2 1 NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N Know what's below. Call before you dig. te r r a c i n a 10 2 0 0 E . G i r a r d A v e , A - 3 1 4 De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 1 ph : 3 0 3 . 6 3 2 . 8 8 6 7 td de s i g n OV E R A L L S I T E A N D S T R I P I N G P L A N 3 N 0 50'100' 1 inch = 50' LEGEND PROP SANITARY SEWER EX SANITARY SEWER EX MAJOR CONTOUR EX MINOR CONTOUR EX EDGE OF ASPHALT 8499 8500 EX WATER LINE EX GAS LINE EX WOOD FENCE NOTES 1.ASPHALT REMOVAL AND PIPE INSTALLATION TO BE PER CDOT STANDARD PLAN NO. M-603-5, SEE SHEET 5. 2.DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW CDOT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, SEE SHEET 5. 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EX UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. EX LIGHT POLE EX FIRE HYDRANT EX OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE EX GAS MARKER EX ELECTRIC VAULT EX GUY WIRE EX WOOD FENCE PROP ASPHALT REMOVAL EXISTING STORM SEWER (TYP) SHOW ASPHALT REMOVAL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION OR TOWN OF FRASER STD. DETAIL? PROVIDE SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL PROVIDE PAVEMENT SECTION OR CDOT STD. DETAIL? 10+00 11+00 12+00 12+64 STRC-1, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8595.00 INV. IN (21") = 8588.10 (E) INV. OUT (21") = 8580.00 (W) MH DEPTH = 15.00' STRC-18, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8594.49 INV. IN (15") = 8585.69 (S) INV. OUT (15") = 8584.89 (N) INV. OUT (8") = 8584.89 (NW) MH DEPTH = 9.60' STRC-19 INSTALL NEW MANHOLE ON EX. 21" PVC SANITARY LINE 4' DIA MH STA=12+48.58 STRC-2, EX 4' DIA MH RIM = 8583.50 INV. IN (21") = 8573.10 (E) INV. OUT (21") = 8573.10 (NW) MH DEPTH = 10.40' 233.58' - 15" PVC @ 3.96% 25 8 . 5 7 ' - E X 2 1 " P V C @ 1 . 7 3 % 13 3 . 3 6 ' - E X 2 1 " P V C @ 1 . 7 3 % 238.9 9 ' - E X 1 5 " P V C @ 0 . 7 4 % 21 3 . 0 2 ' - E X 8 " P V C @ 1 . 4 4 % US H I G H W A Y 4 0 FR A S E R R I V E R T R A I L EDGE OF ASPHALT EDGE OF ASPHALT 61' WIDE ASPHALT EXISTING GAS LINE SE C O N D A R Y A C C E S S T O S A F E W A Y EXISTING WOOD FENCE 10' WIDE ASPHALT 24' WIDE APSHALT EXISTING SANITARY & WATER EASEMENT REC. NO 2005005382 8 5 8 5 8 5 9 0 85 9 5 8 5 9 5 858 2 8 5 8 2 8 5 8 3 85 8 3 8 5 8 4 8 5 8 4 85 8 6 85 8 7 85 8 8 8 5 8 9 859 1 85 9 1 85 9 1 8 5 9 1 85 9 2 85 9 2 85 9 2 8 5 9 2 85 9 3 8 5 9 3 85 9 4 8 5 9 4 8 5 8 5 85 9 0 85 9 5 8 5 9 5 85 8 6 85 8 7 85 8 8 85 8 9 8 5 9 1 8 5 9 2 85 9 3 85 9 4 8 5 9 4 85 9 6 8 5 9 6 8 5 9 5 85 9 4 US HIGHWAY 40 R.O.W. EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT CAUTION!!! EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE CAUTION!!! EXISTING GAS LINE CROSSING SEE NOTE 3 US 40 SANITARY CROSSING 8570 8575 8580 8585 8590 8595 8600 8605 8610 8570 8575 8580 8585 8590 8595 8600 8605 8610 9+50 10+00 85 9 2 . 5 3 85 9 2 . 5 3 85 9 3 . 7 4 85 9 3 . 7 4 11+00 85 9 5 . 9 7 85 9 5 . 9 7 85 9 5 . 9 0 85 9 5 . 9 0 12+00 85 8 4 . 8 4 85 8 4 . 8 4 85 8 7 . 2 2 85 8 7 . 2 2 13+00 ST R C - 1 8 , E X 4 ' D I A M H ST A 1 0 + 1 5 . 0 0 RI M = 8 5 9 4 . 4 9 AD J : 2 . 0 7 IN V . I N ( 1 5 " ) = 8 5 8 5 . 6 9 ( S ) IN V . O U T ( 1 5 " ) = 8 5 8 4 . 8 9 ( N ) IN V . O U T ( 8 " ) = 8 5 8 4 . 8 9 ( N W ) MH D E P T H = 9 . 6 0 ' 233 . 5 8 ' 1 5 " P V C @ 3 . 9 6 % ST R C - 1 9 , I N S T A L L N E W M A N H O L E ON E X . 2 1 " P V C S A N I T A R Y L I N E 4' D I A M H ST A 1 2 + 4 8 . 5 8 RI M = 8 5 8 7 . 0 0 AD J : 0 . 0 0 IN V . I N ( 1 5 " ) = 8 5 7 5 . 6 5 ( S ) IN V . I N ( 2 1 " ) = 8 5 7 5 . 4 7 ( E ) IN V . O U T ( 2 1 " ) = 8 5 7 5 . 4 7 ( W ) MH D E P T H = 1 1 . 5 3 ' US HIGHWAY 40 R.O.W. EXISTING FRASER RIVER TRAIL EXISTING US HIGHWAY 40 PAVEMENT EXISTING GRADE @ PIPE CENTERLINE APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING GAS LINE 7.12' 5.38' SHEET OF BY DA T E # RE V I S I O N D E S C R I P T I O N 20 2 1 - 0 9 - 2 9 X: \ 1 5 - 0 0 3 M E Y E R L O T 2 - G R A N D P A R K \ C A D \ P L A N S \ S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G P L A N S - M E Y E R L O T 2 \ C D S SA N I T A R Y P & P . D W G ME Y E R L O T 2 - U S 4 0 S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G TO W N O F F R A S E R , C O L O R A D O CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S 6 DR A F T XX X 1 XX / X X / 2 0 2 1 NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N Know what's below. Call before you dig. te r r a c i n a 10 2 0 0 E . G i r a r d A v e , A - 3 1 4 De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 1 ph : 3 0 3 . 6 3 2 . 8 8 6 7 td de s i g n SA N I T A R Y S E W E R P L A N A N D P R O F I L E 4 N 0 20' 1 inch = 5' (Vert) 40' 1 inch = 20' (Horz) LEGEND PROP SANITARY SEWER EX SANITARY SEWER EX MAJOR CONTOUR EX MINOR CONTOUR EX EDGE OF ASPHALT 8499 8500 EX WATER LINE EX GAS LINE EX WOOD FENCE NOTES 1.ASPHALT REMOVAL AND PIPE INSTALLATION TO BE PER CDOT STANDARD PLAN NO. M-603-5, SEE SHEET 5. 2.DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW CDOT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, SEE SHEET 5. 3.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EX UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. EX LIGHT POLE EX FIRE HYDRANT EX OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE EX GAS MARKER EX ELECTRIC VAULT EX GUY WIRE EX WOOD FENCE PROP ASPHALT REMOVAL MEASURE DOWN ON EXISTING W.L. VALVES TO VERIFY DEPTH AND SHOW W.L. CROSSING IN PROFILE (CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION). REMOVE 10' OF EXISTING 8" SS MAIN AND INSTALL 8" PLUG PROVIDE INFORMATION OF NEW MH BASE CONFIGURATION AND PLUG 8" OUTLET PER TOWN STANDARDS PROVIDE INFORMATION OF NEW MH CONNECTION WITH EXISTING 21" PVC TRUNK MAIN HAS CDOT GIVEN THE APPROVAL FOR OPEN CUT ACROSS US HWY 40? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION. TOWN OF FRASER WILL STILL REQUIRE A 20" (MIN.) DIA. STEEL CASING FOR OPEN CUT TRENCH FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE OF MAIN AND 36" (MIN) DIA. STEEL CASING FOR JACK & BORE INSTALLATION. SHOW W.L. CROSSING IN PROFILE WITH 18" MIN SEPERATION.PROVIDE INSULATION ON PIPE DEPTH LESS THAN 7' PER TOWN STANDARDS SHOW PAVEMENT FOR ACCESS ROAD MATCH CROWNS OF SEWER PIPES (15" & 21") PROVIDE NOTE ON REMOVAL AND REPLACE EXIST. FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITION PROVIDE SIZE AND PIPE MATERIAL PROVIDE R.O.W. LINE ON NORTH SIDE OF HWY 40. PROVED R.O.W. FOR ACCESS ROAD NORTH OF HWY 40 IN PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET OF BY DA T E # RE V I S I O N D E S C R I P T I O N 20 2 1 - 0 9 - 2 9 X: \ 1 5 - 0 0 3 M E Y E R L O T 2 - G R A N D P A R K \ C A D \ P L A N S \ S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G P L A N S - M E Y E R L O T 2 \ C D S TR A F F I C C O N T R O L A N D D E T A I L S . D W G ME Y E R L O T 2 - U S 4 0 S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G TO W N O F F R A S E R , C O L O R A D O CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S 6 DR A F T XX X 1 XX / X X / 2 0 2 1 NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N Know what's below. Call before you dig. te r r a c i n a 10 2 0 0 E . G i r a r d A v e , A - 3 1 4 De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 1 ph : 3 0 3 . 6 3 2 . 8 8 6 7 td de s i g n TR A F F I C C O N T R O L P L A N A N D P V C D E T A I L 5 NEED TOWN OF FRASER SANITARY SEWER PIPE DETAIL SHEET OF BY DA T E # RE V I S I O N D E S C R I P T I O N 20 2 1 - 0 9 - 2 9 X: \ 1 5 - 0 0 3 M E Y E R L O T 2 - G R A N D P A R K \ C A D \ P L A N S \ S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G P L A N S - M E Y E R L O T 2 \ C D S TR A F F I C C O N T R O L A N D D E T A I L S . D W G ME Y E R L O T 2 - U S 4 0 S A N I T A R Y C R O S S I N G TO W N O F F R A S E R , C O L O R A D O CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S 6 DR A F T XX X 1 XX / X X / 2 0 2 1 NO T F O R CO N S T R U C T I O N Know what's below. Call before you dig. te r r a c i n a 10 2 0 0 E . G i r a r d A v e , A - 3 1 4 De n v e r , C O 8 0 2 3 1 ph : 3 0 3 . 6 3 2 . 8 8 6 7 td de s i g n MA N H O L E D E T A I L S 6 NEED TOWN OF FRASER MANHOLE DETAILS AND SPECIFIC DETAIL FOR CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS AND MANHOLES. DETAIL REVISED MH BASE ON SOUTH SIDE AND HOW TO CONNECT TO EXISTING 21" PVC ON THE NORTH SIDE. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS THAT APPLY TO PROJECT (CASING & PAVING) 2480 W. 26th Avenue, Unit B225 Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 www.merrick.com 1 December 15, 2021 Russell Pennington, P.E., Public Works Director Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 RE: ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Dear Mr. Pennington: We have reviewed The Willows Apartments submittal received November 19, 2021. The submittal included the 100% Construction Plans, dated November 18,2021 by TKE Civil & Structural Engineering. We have the following comments to offer related to the proposed water and sewer systems: The Willows Apartments Construction Plans Town of Fraser staff along with Merrick & Company staff reviewed The Alpenglow at Grand Park Construction Plans. We have the following comments for the proposed water and sewer: 1. Sheet 34 a. Waterline northeast of Garage G – shift 6” waterline lateral north or move gate valve out of curb and gutter. b. Several Gate Valves noted in plan view, but symbol is not shown, please provide symbol for conflict resolution. 2. Sheet 35 a. Add bends at existing cross in American Willow Drive to get proposed water line under the proposed pavement and gate valve out of curb and gutter. 3. Sheet 38 a. H.P. in 12” Waterline between Sta 5+16.37 and 6+14.11 (WATER-MWD PROFILE), eliminate high point in waterline with 0% slope between the two fittings. 4. Sheet 39 a. H.P. in 8” Waterline between Sta 14+04.01 and 16+87.15 (WATER-WEST 1 PROFILE), eliminate high point in waterline with 0% slope between the two fittings. Please advise if you have any questions. Sincerely, MERRICK & COMPANY Jody Allen Terrence P. Kenyon, P.E. 2480 W. 26th Avenue, Unit B225 Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 www.merrick.com 1 December 16, 2021 Russell Pennington, P.E., Public Works Director Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 RE: GRAND PARK, ALPENGLOW APARTMENTS 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DRAINAGE REVIEW Dear Mr. Pennington: We have reviewed the Alpenglow at Grand Park submittal received November 30, 2021. The submittal included the Alpenglow at Grand Park – Planning Areas 2W.1 & 2W.2 Phase III Drainage Report and 100% Construction Plans for Alpenglow at Grand Park , dated November 18, 2021 by TKE Civil & Structural Engineering. We also received a response letter dated November 18, 2021 by TKE Engineering. We have the following comments to offer related to the drainage improvements, including numerours repeated comments that were not adequately addressed. Drainage Report Text 1. At the bottom of Page 3 in Section III, it states that this site “is located within drainage basin E7” and that “this basin is to drain to the northwest to Design Point 7”. Provide excerpts and the Drainage Map from the 2006 High Country Engineering report to show the proposed drainage route and where these features are located. These excerpts are required to have a complete report since the older reports are not readily available by all and this information must be documented. 2. At the top of Page 4, it states that this development is located within the Carrol & Lange drainage Basin H and will be combined with runoff from the No Name channel and directed to DP7 located adjacent to Old Victory Road north of the Cozens Meadow detention pond. Provide excerpts and the Drainage Map from the 2005 Carrol & Lange report to show the proposed drainage route and where these features are located. These excerpts are required to have a complete report since the older reports are not readily available by all and this information must be documented. 3. On Page 5, for Design Point 5, it states that the tributary area will drain into the meadow without water quality treatment until the roadway is extended in the future. We have the following comments: a. On the Drainage Map (Sheet 4), fix the major contour labels in these basins since the labels are randomly shown. b. On the Drainage Map (Sheet 4), the area for Basin DA-09B should be about 0.5 acres, not 1.78 acres. Fix this area on the map and in the runoff analysis. 2 c. Per CDPHE criteria, a maximum of 1 acre of impervious area is allowed to runoff from an entire site without water quality treatment. Since Basin DA-W09B (about 0.5 acres) and several other backlot areas will be routed directly to the meadow, a permanent water quality pond must be provided for the runoff from Basin DA-W10. This is also required since streets and parking lot areas have a higher potential for sediment in runoff. Upon approval of a variance by the Town, a temporary sediment trap could be provided for the interim condition until the future water quality/detention pond is constructed with the roadway extension. 4. On Page 5, from the drainage map it appears that runoff from DA-W14 and DA-W15 flow to a low point in the driveway/parking lot, which then spills over the curb and is routed overland to a swale. At the swale, the runoff is combined with the Design Point 2 runoff, then routed to Design Point 3. Describe this in the text. Per the response to comments, the text was updated to include this discussion, but we could not find it. 5. On Page 5, for Design Point 9, it indicates that 10 cfs in the 100-year storm event will be allowed to bypass Pond 2, which exceeds the Ditch decreed flow of 5 cfs. Only 5 cfs should bypass this pond and the remaining runoff must be detained in the pond to reduce the 100- year peak flow to the historic flow rate. Increasing the bypass flow from 5 cfs to 10 cfs is significant when compared to the total tributary flow in Cozen’s Ditch from Design Point 4 (i.e., about 16 cfs) and will not be allowed. Per the response to comments, we agree that the diversion method proposed is reasonable, although, it is not clear why the overflow bench into Pond 2 could not be lowered to allow stormwater in excess of 5 cfs to be routed into the pond, but still maintain the 5 cfs normal flow depth (i.e., about 0.5 feet) in Cozen’s Ditch. Note that a weir across Cozen’s Ditch may not be required if the overflow elevation is lowered adjacent to the pond to limit the capacity of the ditch to 5 cfs. 6. On Page 6, discuss the proposed culvert that outfalls near Design Point 1A. Per the response to comments, this culvert will only carry minor flows. Include this in the discussion. 7. The drainage plan indicates that two feature ponds are still planned to permanently store stormwater. The response letter indicates that approval was obtained from the State Engineer’s Office. Provide the documentation obtained from the State Engineers’ Office indicating approval to satisfy the requirements of Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 37-92- 602(8) that requires all stormwater for the 5 and 100-year storm events be released within a maximum time period. 8. On Page 5 and in the HEC-HMS Flow Results table on Page 7 and in the calculations section, please make it clear that the HEC-HMS analysis does not reflect the reduction in peak flows at Pond1 and Pond 2 and that the spreadsheet flows are Inflows to the ponds, not Outflows. For example, POA-B MEADOW indicates developed flows that are more than twice the historic flow rates since the HEC-HMS model does not include modeling the ponds. Drainage Map 9. On Sheet 4, label the proposed Pond 1 outlet pipe size. 10. On Sheet 4, label the existing Cozen’s ditch culvert across the trail near the Feature Pond (No Stormwater). 11. Subdivide Basin DA-J to correctly account for runoff that will be intercepted by Cozen’s Ditch and be directed to Pond 2 at the diversion structure based on the proposed and existing contours. Update the HEC-HMS analysis to account for this revision. Per the response letter, 3 meeting onsite is not necessary since this analysis is based on the proposed grading plan that shows that runoff from the southern portion of this basin will be directed to Pond 2. Calculations 12. For the Detention Pond analyses, we have the following comments: a. On the Drainage Basin Map that shows the HEC-HMS connectivity, Basin DA-J must be routed into DP-9 POND 2 (or at least the portion of Basin DA-J tributary to Pond 2). Also include Basin DA-J in the BASINS USED FOR PONDS LISTED BELOW spreadsheet to account for the tributary area and imperviousness and update the pond volume sizing calculations to account for this additional tributary area. See Comment 11 above. b. On the Pond Volume Stage Storage Discharge calculation pages for both ponds, the POND RELEASES (FROM HEC-HMS) for the Developed condition do not reflect the reduction in flow with detention. This is confusing. Please revise this to show the Pond Design Release Rates instead of the HEC-HMS pond inflows. c. The Pond/Outlet Data Summary page indicates two 1.5” diameter holes for the WQ and 100-year outlets, but the Volume Stage Storage Discharge calculation page indicates a rectangular orifice for the WQ control and a 2’ long weir for the 100-year control. Revise as needed, including the details on Sheet 8 in the construction plans. 13. The sizing calculations for the Cozen’s Ditch diversion do not match the details on Sheets 7 and 8 in the construction plans. Also, it appears that the total flow to the diversion has changed since the double pipe from Design Point 3 was extended into the pond. Revise the calculations and details as needed. In addition, see Comment 5 above that suggests the concrete weir across the ditch may not be needed. If a side channel spillway is provided instead of the weir, we recommend ensuring the spillway length is sufficient to allow all of the excess flow above 5 cfs to spill to the pond. If you would like to make sure we’re on the same page for this design, please call me. 14. For the OVR-DP-OS Culvert Sizing calculation, a Headwater Surface Elevation of 8693.87 was used to determine the inlet/outlet control flow. This elevation is above the adjacent low point elevation in Old Victory Road (8692.7 +/-). Also, per the Type C Inlet calculation at this location, the required headwater would be about elevation 8692.5. Revise this design to provide adequate freeboard. 15. Provide pipe/culvert sizing calculations for the storm sewer at Design Point 7 and for the storm sewer system for the Clubhouse. 16. For the Grate Inlet Chart sizing calculations, Sheet 34 in the construction plans shows a 2x2 Inlet for the Building J location, not a 3x3. Verify the proposed size and revise to match. Construction Plans 17. For the detention ponds, we have the following comments: a. On Sheet 7, label the existing contours. b. For Pond 1 and Pond 2, Sheets 5, 6 and 7 indicate Type M Riprap for the overflow spillway, but the Spillway Cross Section on Sheet 8 indicates Type L Riprap. Verify the riprap size and revise to match. c. Provide trash racks/well screen to protect the orifice holes from plugging with debris. Per the response to comments, the concern is not that debris will float through the openings, 4 but is that the openings will plug without protection and need frequent maint enance to operate properly. 18. On Sheet 6, use a minimum 18” thickness for Type L Riprap. This should also be corrected on Sheets 7, 34, and 35. 19. On Sheets 8 and 41, there is a detail for Cozen’s Ditch. Provide the slope for the reaches analyzed in the drainage report (i.e., from DP-4 to DP-9 at 1% and Downstream Diversion at 0.5%). Also, the proposed ditch grading shows only a 0.5% slope on the grading plan drawings (Sheets 22 and 23) and the ditch profile (Sheet 41) which does not match the calculations. Revise the calculations and/or the ditch grading to match. 20. On Sheet 41, provide profiles for the storms sewers at DP-7 (18”), DP-3 (2-24”), and for the storm sewer system for the Clubhouse. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, MERRICK & COMPANY Jeanne M. Boyle, P.E., CFM 2480 W. 26th Avenue, Unit B225 Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 Fax: +1 303-964-3355 www.merrick.com 1 January 21, 2022 Russell Pennington, P.E., Public Works Director Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, Colorado 80442 RE: CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR MEYER LOT 2 – US HIGHWAY 40 SANITARY CROSSING REVIEW Dear Mr. Pennington: We have reviewed Meyer Lot 2 – US 40 Sanitary Crossing submittal received January 14, 2022. The submittal included the Construction Plans for Meyer Lot 2 – US 40 Sanitary Sewer by Terracina Design. We have the following comments to offer related to the proposed sanitary sewer system. Construction Plans 1. Sheet 2: a. Update notes to apply to this project. b. Note 15, Add erosion control and temporary facilities to plan set per CDPHE requirements. 2. Sheet 3: a. Show asphalt removal on secondary access to Safeway paved road and provide pavement section information. b. Provide pavement section information on US Highway 40 and Fraser River Trail. c. Provide size and material of existing water line adjacent to sanitary sewer. 3. Sheet 4: a. Provide measure down on existing water line valves east of sanitary sewer manhole STRC-18. Make sure valve box is free of debris prior to measuring and coordinate with Town of Fraser if a valve nut extension was installed on the valves. Adjust sewer depth if determined necessary. b. Provide information on the updated sanitary sewer manhole STRC-18 base configuration and provide a detail. Provide plug for existing 8” PVC Outlet to the west per Town of Fraser Standards. c. Remove 10’ of existing 8” PVC Sanitary Sewer pipe west of manhole STRC-18 and provide plug. d. Provide size and material of existing water line adjacent to sanitary sewer. e. Provide note on removal and replacement of existing fence south of Fraser River Trail. 2 f. Provide information or detail on how the new sanitary sewer manhole STRC-19 will be constructed in conjunction of keeping the 21” PVC trunk sewer in service. g. The plan is depicting an open cut trench across US Highway 40. Please provided documentation from CDOT that this has been approved. The Town of Fraser will require a 20” (min.) dia. steel casing to be installed in the open cut scenario for future maintenance of the 15” PVC sewer main. If CDOT does not approve the open cut trench across US Highway 40, a 36” (min.) dia. Steel casing will be required for the jack and bore scenario. h. Provide R.O.W. line north of US Highway 40. Provide R.O.W. for access road north of US Highway 40 in plan and profile. i. Show water line crossing in profile with minimum separation. j. Provide insulation for sewer pipe with depth less than 7’ per town standards, show this in the profile view. k. Show access road pavement and R.O.W. in profile. l. Match crowns of the 15” and 21” at sanitary sewer manhole STRC-19. 4. Sheet 5: a. Provide Town of Fraser Sewer Main and Service Line Bedding & Backfill Detail (A-38). 5. Sheet 6: a. Provide detail for cast-in-place manhole base detail with specific information on how to connect to existing 21” PVC while keeping truck main in service. CDOT details do not apply since the manholes are not within CDOT R.O.W.. Additional details are needed for steel casing and asphalt paving. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, MERRICK & COMPANY Terrence P. Kenyon, P.E. Jody M. Allen cc: Adam Cwiklin, CWP, Town of Fraser Water and Wastewater Superintendent t e r r a c i n a d e s i g n Landscape Architecture Planning Civil Engineering 10200 E. Girard Avenue, A-314. Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 December 22, 2021 Ms. Catherine Trotter Town of Fraser 153 Fraser Avenue, P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO. 80442 Dear Catherine, On behalf of Grand Park Development, Terracina Design has reviewed the comments provided by staff via email on December 13, 2021 and offers the following responses: 1. The Town Board approved Resolution No. 2021-11-1 approving the preliminary plat for the project previously known as The Willows Apartments with conditions (attached). Several of the conditions have not been met with your resubmittal of Alpenglow at Grand Park. RESPONSE: See updated Final Plats and responses below. 2. Developer must agree to provide a dedicated right-of way for and construct the remaining portion of Old Victory Road as part of the subdivision improvements for this project. The timing for completing certain segments should be addressed in the SIA. OVR must be dedicated and paved with Filing No. 1. RESPONSE: The final segment of OVR from Mountain Willow to American Willow will be constructed in two phases to correspond with the frontage of filings 1 and 2. The SIA for each filing will include the corresponding segment of OVR. 3. Developer must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Willows project, as well as future development. The proposed Willows project will exceed the capacity of the current system. Construction of these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA, or in a separate improvements agreement, and must be completed before any Certificates of Occupancy will be issued for Willows Apartments. NOT INCLUDED IN THE REVISED CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. RESPONSE: Grand Park agrees to construct the sewer crossing. This meets the requirements of the condition. Construction drawings for the crossing will be submitted as a separate package in January 2022 for review and approval by the Town. Grand Park acknowledges that Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued until the crossing is complete. 4. Add land use table to plats. The table shall include: land uses, approximate acreage of each land use and percentage of each land use, total acreage and square footage of property, total numbers of lots, maximum number of each type of dwelling unit proposed, parking and average density per acre. ADD LAND USE TABLE FOR EACH LOT. ALSO, THERE IS NO REFERENCE TO CONDOMINIUMS ON THE PLATS OR PLAN. RESPONSE: Land Use Tables have been updated to include each lot. Notes referencing condominiums have been added to the cover sheet. t e r r a c i n a d e s i g n Landscape Architecture Planning Civil Engineering 10200 E. Girard Avenue, A-314. Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 5. Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment (All dead-end streets require turnarounds or cul-de- sacs per Attachment A-12 - Cul-De-Sac and Turnarounds for Streets. All turnarounds shall provide ten (10) feet of level, treeless ground around the perimeter. Special attention should be given to provide adequate functional snow storage and sight distance. All turnarounds shall be signed "Emergency Turn Around, No Parking Anytime."). No easement provided. RESPONSE: Easement is shown on the Filing 3 Plat. It is incorporated into the entry turn around for the clubhouse. 6. The applicant needs to confirm the exterior lighting is dark sky compliant. RESPONSE: Lighting is full-cut off down cast fixtures. 7. Applicant must address outside review agency comments from the following entities: Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Xcel Energy, and Mountain Parks Electric. RESPONSE: See below. 8. Engineering review pending. RESPONSE: Engineering comments were received on December 20, 2021. They will be reviewed after the holidays. 9. Applicant shall resubmit for review and approval all final plat and final plan documents changing the land use from apartments to condominiums. A final plat public hearing shall be scheduled before the Planning Commission once a complete packet has been submitted. RESPONSE: The Final Plat has been revised and is included with this response letter. There are no changes to the Final Plan. RESPONSE: Noted. RESPONSE: Nests have not been observed on this site. If at the time of construction, nests are observed proper measures will be taken. RESPONSE: Trash containers are bear proof. RESPONSE: Noted. RESPONSE: Noted. RESPONSE: Fencing is only proposed around the outdoor pool. No other fencing is contemplated. RESPONSE: Noted. RESPONSE: The setback is from the right of way. RESPONSE: NOTED. P.O.Box 2225 998 County Road 553 Granby, CO 80446 T: 970.281.5280 / 512.200.2499 1 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 Town of Fraser C/o Russell Pennington Town of Fraser P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 80447 Re: Final Plan - Engineering Response GRAND PARK – THE WILLOWS APARTMENTS Dear Russell: This response letter presents our engineering responses to the engineering comments received from our 90% plan issue on September 24th, 2021. The plan changes discussed herein will be made in our final engineering plan submission, whose date is still to be determined. ROADWAY COMMENTS American Willow Drive ROW The proposed extension of American Willow Drive will not be allowed to connect to the intersection of US 40 and Rendezvous Road at this time. This potentially will bisect the Town of Fraser’s Conservation Easement that is required by the Annexation Agreement. This connection will have to be reevaluated at a later date and what requirements will be required. GRAND PARK (11/18/21): Grand Park objects to this comment by Town Staff. It is factually incorrect and unrelated to engineering for this specific project. The road that will connect to US40 at the Rendezvous Road intersection is an integral part of the overall Grand Park PDD and this connection to US 40 will be made at such time as traffic trips warrant such connection or earlier at the discretion of Grand Park pursuant to the terms of the annexation agreement. As required for a collector roadway, the ROW for American Willow Drive has been increased from 36 feet to 60 feet. It is noted that this has significantly decreased setbacks to the proposed buildings; for example, the Ski Storage building has a setback of less than 5 feet. See the enclosed excerpt from Sheet 13, Site Plan-Phase 1. TERRACINA DESIGN (11/18/21): This request to make American Willow Drive a collector roadway is from the Town staff and Merrick based on the road connecting to US 40 when needed in the future and in accordance with the PDDP, traffic study, and annexation agreement. This plan change is only applicable with the connection to US40. This requirement contradicts the staff comment above that states, “…will not be allowed to connect to the intersection of US40 and Rendezvous Road. Without that connection this is not a collector road, it is a neighborhood street. Regardless, we have incorporated the 60’ right of way as we believe the road connection will be necessary in the future. Planning Area 2W is a zero lot line setback planning area. With this changed to a collector road for the trips when connected to US40, the setback of the Ski Storage building is 5’ above the required 0’ setback requirement for planning area 2W. Old Victory Road The right of way for Old Victory Road between Mountain Willow Drive and the intersection at Kings Crossing Road is required to be dedicated to the Town of Fraser as part of this project. It shall also be constructed and paved with Filing 1. The right of way dedication shall be included as part of this project and the roadway construction plans shall be included within the construction plans for this project. Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 2 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 2 GRAND PARK (11/18/21): Grand Park has constructed, paved and has been attempting to dedicate most of Old Victory Road discussed, but the segment between Mountain Willow Drive and American Willow Drive will not be paved or dedicated until completion of the phase of project served by any portion of this dirt section of Old Victory Road. When this was intended to be a HUD funded apartment project, Grand Park had committed to a phased DIA not directly linked to the project since off-site improvements were not allowed under the HUD financing as previously explained to the Town. Now that the project will be a multifamily for sale project completed in 3 phases, Grand Park will incorporate the section of road associated with phase 1 in the SIA for phase 1 and the section for phase 2 in the SIA for phase 2. The balance of the road is completed and awaiting the Town of Fraser’s preliminary acceptance. UTILITY COMMENTS Offsite Utilities With this development, the Town's downstream collection system capacity will exceed the Town's design criteria. Recent analysis, per our email of June 1st, showed that 3 downstream reaches currently exceed 50 percent capacity. The addition of the Willows Apartments will overload an additional 5 reaches of the FM sewer shed and 2 reaches of the CM sewer shed. Prior to adding this project, the new sewer crossing of US 40 should be designed and constructed. Once constructed, the CM sewers would be disconnected from the Forest Meadows sewer system and diverted to this new US 40 crossing. It is noted that the Willows Apartments as proposed plans for 258 EQR, approximately twice the original master plan for this area. GRAND PARK (11/18/21): Grand Park understands that stretch of sewer could be nearing the 50% full capacity trigger and has previously committed to enter into a DIA for the sewer line that will cross US Hwy 40 as was previously planned with the Fraser Sanitation District in 2005 when the virtually unused 8” sanitary sewer line was requested to be used by Grand Park by the Fraser Sanitation District. Grand Park previously made clear to the Town staff, this improvement needs to be handled with a DIA as an offsite improvement. The old designs for this connection are being researched and the design for such connection will be presented to the TOF this winter for approval to be constructed next summer. Construction Plans 1. Sheet 39 i. Straighten pipe runs to minimize deflections in fittings. Good design and construction practice should minimize the number of bends required, typically resulting in less future maintenance. TKE (11/18/21): The DIP bends allow up to 5 degrees of deflection, which is the industry standard care of practice. We use only up to 3 degrees and a factor of safety. There are no vertical or horizontal deflections in straight runs of pipe. ii. Show all pipe/utility crossings. TKE (11/18/21): We add crossings. iii. Overlapping text – difficult to read. TKE (11/18/21): Cleaned up per comments 2. Sheet 40 i. As for Sheet 39, iii above, straighten pipe runs to minimize deflections in fittings. TKE (11/18/21): See response 1.i. above. STORMWATER COMMENTS Drainage Report 1. At the bottom of Page 3 in Section III, it states that this site “is located within drainage basin E7” and that “this basin is to drain to the northwest to Design Point 7”. Provide excerpts and the Drainage Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 3 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 3 Map from the 2006 High Country Engineering report to show the proposed drainage route and where these features are located. TKE (11/18/21): We will not excerpt out portions of old report or drainage maps. We previously included the entire previous reports/maps for reference, which you did not like. 2. At the top of Page 4, it states that this development is located within the Carrol & Lange drainage Basin H and will be combined with runoff from the No Name channel and directed to DP7 located adjacent to Old Victory Road north of the Cozens Meadow detention pond. Provide excerpts and the Drainage Map from the 2005 Carrol & Lange report to show the proposed drainage route and where these features are located. TKE (11/18/21): See Response #1 above. 3. On Page 5, for Design Point 5, it states that the tributary area will drain into the meadow without water quality treatment until the roadway is extended in the future. We have the following comments: a. On the Drainage Map, fix the major contour labels in these basins. TKE (11/18/21): Contour labels added. b. On the Drainage Map, the basin boundary between DA-W09 and DA-W10 is not drawn correctly per the contours. It appears that the basin divide is located through the center of the large building and that at least half of the building and the circular driveway area flows to American Willows Drive. Fix the basin divide as defined by the proposed contours. TKE (11/18/21): We split W10 into two physical subbasins which are less than an acre each. W9 is now an undeveloped subbasin that is inside our boundary, but is totally un- improved meadow. c. Per CDPHE criteria, a maximum of 1 acre of impervious area is allowed to runoff from a site without water quality treatment. The drainage area for Basins DA-W09 and DA-W10 is about 2 acres which exceeds the maximum allowable area, therefore, water quality treatment must be provided. TKE (11/18/21): The sub-basins are less than an acre each, and they drain to different areas. These minor basins are accounted for in our on-site treatment from an over-treatment standpoint, and it is also secondarily treated in the wetlands ponds downstream. d. With the basin boundary correction per Comment 3b, Basin DA-W09 will be reduced to less than 1 acre so this basin could drain to the meadow without water quality treatment. TKE (11/18/21): See comments 3b and 3c above. e. For the remaining area that flows to Design Point 5, a permanent water quality pond must be provided. Upon approval of a variance by the Town, a temporary sediment trap could be provided for the interim condition until the future water quality pond is constructed with the roadway extension. TKE (11/18/21): See comments 3b and 3c above. We can add a minor temporary sediment trap if necessary. 4. On Page 5, for Design Point 8, it states that Cozen’s Ditch crosses Mountain Willow Drive, but it appears to cross American Willow Drive per the Drainage Map. Revise as needed. TKE (11/18/21): The text was clarified. 5. On Page 5, from the drainage map it appears that runoff from DA-W14 and DA-W15 flow to a low point in the driveway/parking lot, which then spills over the curb and is routed overland to a swale. At the swale, the runoff is combined with the Design Point 2 runoff, then routed to Design Point 3. Describe this in the text. Also, erosion protection for these curb overflows must be provided on the relatively steep slope. TKE (11/18/21): Updated text. The flow through the curb chase at this location is less than 0.4 cfs and does not require permanent erosion control. Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 4 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 4 6. On Page 5, for Water Quality Pond 2, providing water quality storage for DP-OS runoff in lieu of treating the DP-2 runoff is proposed. This is not acceptable. Water quality storage must be sized for all of the runoff routed through a pond, regardless if the runoff is from offsite or onsite, otherwise the pond will not operate properly. In addition, runoff to DP-OS cannot be treated in lieu of the runoff to DP- 2. Water quality storage must be provided for the runoff to DP-2 which includes buildings, roadways, and parking lot areas. We recommend locating the water quality storage control at Design Point 3 upstream end of the proposed culvert) to provide water quality treatment for the runoff to DP-2. TKE (11/18/21): Water Quality Ponds 2 and 3 were eliminated. 7. On Page 5, for Design Point 9, it indicates that 10 cfs in the 100-year storm event will be allowed to bypass Feature POND 2, which exceeds the Ditch decreed flow of 5 cfs. Only 5 cfs should bypass this pond and the remaining runoff should be detained in the pond to reduce the 100-year peak flow to the historic flow rate. TKE (11/18/21): What we propose is the only reasonable way to divert ditch flow into Pond 2. As the water surface in the ditch rises, you cannot release a constant 5cfs downstream. The downstream ditch is more than capable of carrying the 10cfs, and if something does not function as-intended, the water will overflow into the meadow and mix with a larger, delayed meadow flow. There are no structures that can possibly be affected. Any potential untreated stormwater that does travels down Cozen’s ditch will flow into the larger feature pond between this subdivision and Cozen’s Meadow. From there, it will flow through two more downstream feature ponds and will have ample treatment. The short duration of the peak run-off from a 100-year storm will not significantly impact decreed ditch flows. 8. On Page 6, discuss the proposed culvert that outfalls near Design Point 1A TKE (11/18/21): Only carries minor low point drainage from Building J low-lying areas. 9. From the response letter we understand that the amenity “ponds were previously approved”. Clarify who previously approved the ponds. Also, if these ponds are still planned to permanently store stormwater, provide documentation that the State Engineers Office has approved the amenity ponds and an augmentation plan has been established since these ponds will not meet the requirements of Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 37-92-602(8) that requires all stormwater for the 5 and 100-year storm events to be released within a maximum time period. TKE (11/18/21): The amenity pond approval was with the State Engineer’s office and the Town of Fraser prior to this project. Contact The town of Fraser and Grand Park directly for additional approval questions. The proposed outlet structure lowers the permanent water surface elevation (from elevation 8677 to 8673.50) and reduces permanent storage significantly. We are using the upper 3.5’ as detention and water quality for this project. This modification does not change the function of the feature pond and does not require state approval. Drainage Map 10. Include copies of the Drainage Map Overall and Drainage Map (Sheets 3 and 4) in Appendix D. TKE (11/18/21): Completed. 11. On Sheet 3 (Drainage Map Overall), label the “No Name” channel, Cozen’s Ditch, and the existing wetland/detention ponds. Also label the “northern” wetland mitigation/detention ponds if these are not the same as the “existing” wetland/detention ponds. TKE (11/18/21): We added labels. Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 5 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 5 12. On Sheet 4, just north of the Mountain Willow Drive and Old Victory Road intersection, revise the existing culvert label to indicate 6-24” RCP’s instead of 5 to match the report text and number of culverts shown. TKE (11/18/21): Completed. 13. On Sheet 4, label all of the proposed storm pipe and culvert sizes. TKE (11/18/21): Completed. 14. Show and label the existing Cozen’s ditch culverts across the Bluestem Ct. cul-de-sac and across the trail near the Feature Pond (No Stormwater). TKE (11/18/21): Completed. 15. The tributary area for Basins DA-J, DA-K, and DA-L are all labeled to be 0.11 acres which does not appear to be correct. Correct these areas as needed. TKE (11/18/21): Corrected. 16. Subdivide Basin DA-J to correctly account for runoff that must be directed to Feature POND 2 at the diversion structure. Update the HEC-HMS analysis to account for this revision. TKE (11/18/21): The basins are drawn correctly. If you have questions, I will meet you on-site to review it. 17. It appears that this project has the potential for disturbing existing wetlands areas/Waters of the U.S. Show the wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas on the Drainage Map. If so, the proposed fill within the wetlands/Waters of the U.S. areas must be approved by the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) by obtaining a 404 wetlands permit. Provide documentation that a permit has been obtained or that it is not required. TKE (11/18/21): This was provided to the Town of Fraser on 5/21/21 and hereby resubmitting to you again. Calculations 18. For the Detention Pond analyses, we have the following comments: a. The NOAA Atlas 60-minute (1 hour) rainfall duration was used to for the MHFD-Detention analysis, but per the Grand County Storm Drainage Design and Technical Criteria Manual, the 2-hour rainfall duration must be used. Revise the pond sizing analyses to use the 2-hour rainfall duration. TKE (11/18/21): The 2-hr duration in the GC storm drainage manual is intended for large CUHP stormwater models (not used here). The requirement was written years before the spreadsheet you mention was developed. In 25 years of stormwater design in Grand County, that requirement has never been used. We used the 24-hr storm in the HEC-HMS TR-55 analysis. If I utilize a 2-hr duration storm in HEC-HMS per that requirement, the design flows will be half what I calculate. b. The first page of the pond sizing analysis uses the MHFD-Detention Detention Basin Stage-Storage Table Builder spreadsheet. Instead of switching to use a TKE developed spreadsheet, continue to use the MHFD-Detention spreadsheet to size the pond outlets. In addition, the MHFD-Detention spreadsheet must be used for the pond sizing analysis since it provides the 95% and 99% drain times for each storm event which is needed to verify that the Colorado Revised Statute (CRS) 37- 92-602(8) criteria is met. TKE (11/18/21): As engineer of record, I will utilize my own trusted calculations. Town of Fraser storm drainage requirements do not require using the UDFCD spreadsheet for outlet structures or drain times. My calculations include drain times for every pond and every stage, which all meet CRS requirements for releasing 97% of 5-yr run-off within 72 hours, Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 6 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 6 and 99% of 100-yr run-off within 120 hours. If you need help understanding this, please call me directly before commenting further. c. Provide the Detention Basin Stage-Storage Table Builder page for Ponds 2 and 3, not just Ponds 1 and 4. TKE (11/18/21): See response to 18b above. d. For Ponds 1, 2, and 3, the WQCV drain times are all less than 40 hours. Revise the orifice sizing to increase the drain times to at least 40 hours. TKE (11/18/21): Our drain times were very close to 40 hours in all three ponds (37.8 hrs, 25.8 hrs, & 35.8 hrs), which met the intent of the requirements. The smaller the pond volume gets, the harder it is to hold water and release it in exactly 40 hours. When you make the orifices smaller than 1 inch, it more easily gets clogged with floating debris. These ponds have now been combined into one pond, so please review that design. e. For Pond 1, the 100-year drain time is only a few hours more than the WQCV drain time which is not reasonable. Revise the analysis as needed to determine reasonable results. TKE (11/18/21): This is a small pond, which must be practically designed much differently than the large regional ponds you must be used to. The 100-yr release is 3.3 cfs, which only takes 2.7 hours to drain down to the WQ WS elevation. The WQCV then releases in 37.8 hours. The design is appropriate. f. For both Pond 1 and POND 2, the Pond Release rates (from HEC-HMS) indicate that the developed release rates and much higher than the historic release rates. Revise the pond outlets to reduce the 10-year and 100-year peak flows to the 100-year historic flow rates. TKE (11/18/21): The HEC-HMS model does not model the detention and release rate effect into the “Developed” model. The designed pond releases are at or below the historic releases. 19. For the channel capacity calculations, also provide calculations for the swale located in Basins DA-W01 and DA-W19, at the outfall of the DP-2 culvert to Design Point 3, and at the outfall of the DP-3 culvert to Design Point 9. TKE (11/18/21): We added a double 24” pipe from DP3 to DP9, so please see the new calculation. The other 3 requested swales do not require calculations. The swales in Basins W01 and W19 have 100-yr flow rate of less than 1 CFS. The swale from DP2 to DP3 is 2’ below the back of curb and flows 4.3 CFS in the 100-yr storm. 20. Provide inlet and storm sewer sizing calculations for all of the proposed storm sewers, such as at DP- OS and for the Building J 18” RCP. We understand that these will be provided with the next submittal. TKE (11/18/21): See provided. 21. Provide culvert sizing calculations for all of the proposed culverts, not just for the triple 24” under Mountain Willow Drive. Also include calculations for the existing trail, roadway, and cul-de-sac crossings to verify they have adequate capacity. We understand that these will be provided with the next submittal. TKE (11/18/21): All culverts calcs are now provided. The downstream Cozen’s ditch pipes across the cul-de-sac are not a part of this project. We are not changing the flow in Cozen’s Ditch with this project. However, I can assure you that a triple 24” pipe can adequately convey Cozen’s ditch at 5-10 cfs. 22. Provide riprap sizing calculations. We understand that these will be provided with the next submittal. TKE (11/18/21): See provided. 23. At all storm sewer sump locations, provide emergency overflow calculations to determine the depth of overtopping assuming the inlets are plugged. Verify that the overflows will be contained within Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 7 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 7 drainage easements and that there is at least 1 foot of freeboard to the finished grade for adjacent structures. TKE (11/18/21): I am not going to do that. You are asking for calculations that most practicing engineers can look at with previous experience and intuition and determine there is no concern. If you have a specific area where you think there is a problem, let’s talk about it. Ultimately, I am the engineer of record. If there is a problem, the problem is mine. Construction Plans 24. Update Sheets 3 and 4 Drainage Maps per the above comments. TKE (11/18/21): Okay. 25. There are several sheets that do not show the north end of the site at the intersection of Mountain Willow Drive and Old Victory Road. Adjust the view port or add another sheet to show this area for the Existing Conditions & Demolition, Site Plans, Horizontal Control Plan, Stormwater Management Plan, Grading Plans, Roadway Alignment Map, Signage & Striping Plan, and Utility Plans. TKE (11/18/21): I am not going to reformat my entire plan set to include an area that is not a part of this project. The previous construction plans for those filings are on record at the Town of Fraser. 26. For all of the detention ponds, we have the following comments: a. For all of the detailed detention pond grading drawings, label the existing and proposed contours. TKE (11/18/21): Completed. b. Provide forebays at all storm sewer and culvert outfalls into the ponds. TKE (11/18/21): The Town of Fraser does not require forebays, per Russell Pennington. We have been through this on past projects. c. Provide trickle channels. Include spot elevations to define the trickle channel inverts. Note that at the micropools, the trickle channel inverts must be at least 4 inches above the micropool water surface elevation. TKE (11/18/21): Pond 1 is a low-lying park area. Trickle channels would require excavation, regrading, and tree removal. The underlying material is sand and gravel, so infiltration of minor low-lying areas is not a problem. POND 2 has a permanent feature pond lower water surface elevation, so again, no trickle channel is required. d. Provide minimum 2% cross slopes to the trickle channels in the pond bottoms. Grading the bottoms flat, such as shown for POND 2, is not acceptable. TKE (11/18/21): See response to 26c. e. At Pond 1 address the following: i. Revise the embankment alignment on the east end to allow sufficient space for runoff from Narrowleaf Ct. to drain properly into the pond instead of directing flow at the pond embankment. TKE (11/18/21): The inlet works as designed. We will adjust the embankment in the field and/or rebuild the run-down if required. ii. It appears that some grading will be required at the western end of the pond to provide positive drainage to the outlet structure and eliminate potential sump areas in the pond bottom. Revise the grading as needed. TKE (11/18/21): See response to 26c. iii. Verify that a minimum of 1 foot of freeboard is available above the emergency spillway flow elevation to the existing structures, especially at the western end of the pond where the structures are at a lower elevation. TKE (11/18/21): The houses on the west end are very high. The lowest houses are near the cul-de-sac intersection. The lowest FFE elevation is above 8672, and our overflow berm is at 8668, so flooding the house is not a concern. Fraser – GPWA Response Letter (Final Plan) Page 8 November 18, 2021 JN: 19008 8 f. At POND 2, for the diversion structure, extend the proposed riprap down to the toe of slope. TKE (11/18/21): Completed. Riprap extents are as typically required. We will not extend riprap through the meadow. g. On Sheet 10, in Generic Section – Pond 1-3, the micropool must be shown to be 2.5’ deep, not 1’ deep. TKE (11/18/21): We have used 1’ deep micropools on other projects in Grand Park, as approved by the Town of Fraser. h. Provide trash racks/well screen to protect the orifice holes from plugging with debris. TKE (11/18/21): The orifices are 1” to 1.5”. No trash rack will prevent small twigs from floating through. The design is appropriate. i. For Pond 1, provide a control to reduce the 100-year flow to the historic rate. TKE (11/18/21): Please look at the Pond 1 outflow calculations closer. The proposed 100-yr release of 3.1 cfs is below the 100-yr historic rate of 3.6 cfs. 27. On Sheet 11, update the existing conditions to only reflect the improvements that have already been constructed at the site. Do not show the new trails at Pond 1 and Pond 2 and proposed Ponds 3 & 4. TKE (11/18/21): The farm and ranch access road shown is present today. The plan is correct. 28. On Sheet 18 Grading Plan Overall, per the contours it appears that the available flow depth at the following structures is minimal. Verify that the finished floor elevations (including any proposed basements) for all structures are above the proposed 100-year water surface plus at least 1 foot of freeboard. Backwater at culverts must also be considered. TKE (11/18/21): This has been considered, and the grading is appropriate. There are no basements. a. Based on the existing condition contours, there appears to only be about 2 feet of depth (or less) from the existing Cozen Ditch invert to the existing structures along the east side of Mountain Willow Drive between Bluestem Ct. and American Willow Drive. TKE (11/18/21): The existing contours do not reflect as-built home elevations. The ditch is existing today and is nowhere near the FFE’s of the houses. Please call with any questions or comments. Thank you. Sincerely, Accepted by: TKE Engineering, LLC Lakota Land Group Anthony E. (Tony) Krempin, PE Principal Authorized Signature DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ALBUQUERQUE DISTRICT 4101 JEFFERSON PLAZA NE ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87109-3435 May 21, 2021 Regulatory Division (SPK-2002-75601) Grand Park Development, LLC Attn: Mr. Clark Lipscomb Post Office Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 clark@cstoneholdings.com Dear Mr. Lipscomb: We are responding to your request for a Department of the Army (DA) permit for the Willows Apartments at Grand Park project. The approximate 22-acre project area is located within the Grand Park Development site, north of Leland Creek, and on the Cozens Ditch within the Town of Fraser, centered at Latitude 39.930453°, Longitude -105.794870, Grand County, Colorado. Based on the information you provided to this office, the Willows Apartments at Grand Park project involves the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States, subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The specific activity that requires DA authorization is relocating a 1,070-linear-foot reach of Cozens Ditch to the east of its existing alignment to facilitate residential development. The project will result in an additional 100 linear feet of man-made ditch. The proposed activities would be conducted in accordance with the preconstruction notification plans dated September 9, 2020, and the revised Cozens Ditch Relocation Plan map submitted to the Corps on May 18, 2021. We have determined that activities in waters of the United States associated with the project are authorized by Nationwide Permit (NWP) 46 – Discharges in Ditches. You must comply with all terms and conditions of the NWP and applicable regional conditions. Enclosed is information about the NWP terms and conditions and 2017 Albuquerque District regional conditions for Colorado (enclosure 1). You should pay particular attention to General Condition 12 – Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls, and General Condition 30 which requires that you sign the enclosed Compliance Certification (enclosure 2) and return it to this office within 30 days after completion of the authorized work. This verification is valid until March 18, 2022, when the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked. Furthermore, if you commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date the NWP is modified, reissued, or revoked, you will have 12 months from the date of the modification, reissuance, or revocation to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions. Failure to comply with the general and regional conditions of this NWP may result in the suspension or revocation of your authorization. We would appreciate your feedback on this permit action including your interaction with our staff and processes. For more information about our program or to complete our Regulatory Program national customer service survey, visit our website at https://www.spa.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Program-and-Permits/. 2- Please refer to identification number SPK-2002-75601 in any correspondence concerning this project. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Northwestern Colorado Branch, 400 Rood Avenue, Room 224, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, by email at Benjamin.R.Wilson@usace.army.mil, or telephone at 970-243-1199, extension 1012. Sincerely, Benjamin R. Wilson Project Manager NW Colorado Branch Enclosures cc: Noah Greenberg, SWCA Environmental Consultants, Noah.Greenberg@swca.com Catherine Trotter, Town of Fraser, ctrotter@town.fraser.co.us BUILDING STRONG® U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS – SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 1325 J ST. – SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 www.spk.usace.army.mil www.facebook.com/sacramentodistrict www.youtube.com/sacramentodistrict www.twitter.com/USACESacramento www.flickr.com/photos/sacramentodistrict Nationwide Permit Summary 33 CFR Part 330; Issuance of Nationwide Permits – March 19, 2017 46.Discharges in Ditches. Discharges of dredged or fill material into non-tidal ditches that are: 1)Constructed in uplands, 2)receive water from an area determined to be a water of the United States prior to the construction of the ditch, 3)divert water to an area determined to be a water of the United States prior to the construction of the ditch, and 4)determined to be waters of the United States. The discharge must not cause the loss of greater than one acre of waters of the United States. This NWP does not authorize discharges of dredged or fill material into ditches constructed in streams or other waters of the United States, or in streams that have been relocated in uplands. This NWP does not authorize discharges of dredged or fill material that increase the capacity of the ditch and drain those areas determined to be waters of the United States prior to construction of the ditch. Notification: The permittee must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer prior to commencing the activity. (See general condition 32.) (Authority: Section 404) A.Regional Conditions 1. Regional Conditions for California, excluding the Tahoe Basin http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/regula tory/nwp/2017_nwps/Final_SPK_Regional_Conditions_for California.pdf?ver=2017-03-23-120307-207 2.Regional Conditions for Nevada, including the Tahoe Basin hhttp://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/regu latory/nwp/2017_nwps/Final_SPK_Regional_Conditions_fo r_Nevada.pdf?ver=2017-03-23-120306-910 3.Regional Conditions for Utah http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/regula tory/nwp/2017_nwps/Final_SPK_Regional_Conditions_for Utah.pdf?ver=2017-03-23-120303-503 4.Regional Conditions for Colorado. http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Portals/12/documents/regula tory/nwp/2017_nwps/Final_2017_Regional_Conditions_in_ Colorado.pdf?ver=2017-03-23-133821-047 B.Nationwide Permit General Conditions Note: To qualify for NWP authorization, the prospective permittee must comply with the following general conditions, as applicable, in addition to any regional or case-specific conditions imposed by the division engineer or district engineer. Prospective permittees should contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine if regional conditions have been imposed on an NWP. Prospective permittees should also contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine the status of Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification and/ or Coastal Zone Management Act consistency for an NWP. Every person who may wish to obtain permit authorization under one or more NWPs, or who is currently relying on an existing or prior permit authorization under one or more NWPs, has been and is on notice that all of the provisions of 33 CFR 330.1 through 330.6 apply to every NWP authorization. Note especially 33 CFR 330.5 relating to the modification, suspension, or revocation of any NWP authorization. 1. Navigation. a) No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. b) Any safety lights and signals prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard, through regulations or otherwise, must be installed and maintained at the permittee’s expense on authorized facilities in navigable waters of the United States. c) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 2. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area, unless the activity’s primary purpose is to impound water. All permanent and temporary crossings of waterbodies shall be suitably culverted, bridged, or otherwise designed and constructed to maintain low flows to sustain the movement of those aquatic Encl 1 Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 2 species. If a bottomless culvert cannot be used, then the crossing should be designed and constructed to minimize adverse effects to aquatic life movements. 3. Spawning Areas. Activities in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g., through excavation, fill, or downstream smothering by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area are not authorized. 4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas. Activities in waters of the United States that serve as breeding areas for migratory birds must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. 5. Shellfish Beds. No activity may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations, unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWPs 4 and 48, or is a shellfish seeding or habitat restoration activity authorized by NWP 27. 6. Suitable Material. No activity may use unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.). Material used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see section 307 of the Clean Water Act). 7. Water Supply Intakes. No activity may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake, except where the activity is for the repair or improvement of public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. 8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments. If the activity creates an impoundment of water, adverse effects to the aquatic system due to accelerating the passage of water, and/or restricting its flow must be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 9. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable, the preconstruction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters must be maintained for each activity, including stream channelization, storm water management activities, and temporary and permanent road crossings, except as provided below. The activity must be constructed to withstand expected high flows. The activity must not restrict or impede the passage of normal or high flows, unless the primary purpose of the activity is to impound water or manage high flows. The activity may alter the preconstruction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters if it benefits the aquatic environment (e.g., stream restoration or relocation activities). 10. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. The activity must comply with applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements. 11. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands or mudflats must be placed on mats, or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance. 12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. Permittees are encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or no-flow, or during low tides. 13. Removal of Temporary Fills. Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre- construction elevations. The affected areas must be revegetated, as appropriate. 14. Proper Maintenance. Any authorized structure or fill shall be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety and compliance with applicable NWP general conditions, as well as any activity-specific conditions added by the district engineer to an NWP authorization. 15. Single and Complete Project. The activity must be a single and complete project. The same NWP cannot be used more than once for the same single and complete project. 16. Wild and Scenic Rivers. a) No NWP activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a ‘‘study river’’ for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, unless the appropriate Federal agency with direct management responsibility for such river, has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status. b) If a proposed NWP activity will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a ‘‘study river’’ for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, the permittee must submit a pre- construction notification (see general condition 32). The district engineer will coordinate the PCN with the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river. The permittee shall not begin the NWP activity until notified by the district engineer that the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river has determined in writing that the proposed NWP activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status. c) Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal land management agency responsible for the designated Wild and Scenic River or study river (e.g., National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Information on these rivers is also available at: http://www.rivers.gov/. 17. Tribal Rights. No NWP activity may cause more than minimal adverse effects on tribal rights (including treaty rights), protected tribal resources, or tribal lands. 18. Endangered Species. a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), or which will directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which ‘‘may affect’’ a listed species or critical habitat, unless ESA section 7 consultation addressing the effects of the proposed activity has been Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 3 completed. Direct effects are the immediate effects on listed species and critical habitat caused by the NWP activity. Indirect effects are those effects on listed species and critical habitat that are caused by the NWP activity and are later in time, but still are reasonably certain to occur. b) Federal agencies should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of the ESA. If preconstruction notification is required for the proposed activity, the Federal permittee must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation has not been submitted, additional ESA section 7 consultation may be necessary for the activity and the respective federal agency would be responsible for fulfilling its obligation under section 7 of the ESA. c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre- construction notification to the district engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat, and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that might affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the pre- construction notification must include the name(s) of the endangered or threatened species that might be affected by the proposed activity or that utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed activity. The district engineer will determine whether the proposed activity ‘‘may affect’’ or will have ‘‘no effect’’ to listed species and designated critical habitat and will notify the non-Federal applicant of the Corps’ determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre- construction notification. In cases where the non- Federal applicant has identified listed species or critical habitat that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, and has so notified the Corps, the applicant shall not begin work until the Corps has provided notification that the proposed activity will have ‘‘no effect’’ on listed species or critical habitat, or until ESA section 7 consultation has been completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps. d) As a result of formal or informal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the district engineer may add species specific permit conditions to the NWPs. e) Authorization of an activity by an NWP does not authorize the ‘‘take’’ of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization (e.g., an ESA Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion with ‘‘incidental take’’ provisions, etc.) from the FWS or the NMFS, the Endangered Species Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to take a listed species, where ‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The word ‘‘harm’’ in the definition of take’’ means an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering. f) f the non-federal permittee has a valid ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit with an approved Habitat Conservation Plan for a project or a group of projects that includes the proposed NWP activity, the non-federal applicant should provide a copy of that ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit with the PCN required by paragraph (c) of this general condition. The district engineer will coordinate with the agency that issued the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit to determine whether the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation conducted for the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. If that coordination results in concurrence from the agency that the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation for the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit, the district engineer does not need to conduct a separate ESA section 7 consultation for the proposed NWP activity. The district engineer will notify the non-federal applicant within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit covers the proposed NWP activity or whether additional ESA section 7 consultation is required. g) Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the FWS and NMFS or their world wide Web pages at http://www.fws.gov/ or http://www.fws.gov/ipac and http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/ respectively. 19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. The permittee is responsible for ensuring their action complies with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permittee is responsible for contacting appropriate local office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine applicable measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds or eagles, including whether ‘‘incidental take’’ permits are necessary and available under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act for a particular activity. 20. Historic Properties. a) In cases where the district engineer determines that the activity may have the potential to cause effects to properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, the activity is not authorized, until the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) have been satisfied. b) Federal permittees should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If pre-construction notification is required for the proposed NWP activity, the Federal permittee must provide the Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 4 district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation is not submitted, then additional consultation under section 106 may be necessary. The respective federal agency is responsible for fulfilling its obligation to comply with section 106. c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre- construction notification to the district engineer if the NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to any historic properties listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including previously unidentified properties. For such activities, the preconstruction notification must state which historic properties might have the potential to be affected by the proposed NWP activity or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic properties or the potential for the presence of historic properties. Assistance regarding information on the location of, or potential for, the presence of historic properties can be sought from the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, or designated tribal representative, as appropriate, and the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). When reviewing pre-construction notifications, district engineers will comply with the current procedures for addressing the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The district engineer shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to carry out appropriate identification efforts, which may include background research, consultation, oral history interviews, sample field investigation, and field survey. Based on the information submitted in the PCN and these identification efforts, the district engineer shall determine whether the proposed NWP activity has the potential to cause effects on the historic properties. Section 106 consultation is not required when the district engineer determines that the activity does not have the potential to cause effects on historic properties (see 36 CFR 800.3(a)). Section 106 consultation is required when the district engineer determines that the activity has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. The district engineer will conduct consultation with consulting parties identified under 36 CFR 800.2(c) when he or she makes any of the following effect determinations for the purposes of section 106 of the NHPA: no historic properties affected, no adverse effect, or adverse effect. Where the non-Federal applicant has identified historic properties on which the activity might have the potential to cause effects and so notified the Corps, the non-Federal applicant shall not begin the activity until notified by the district engineer either that the activity has no potential to cause effects to historic properties or that NHPA section 106 consultation has been completed. d) For non-federal permittees, the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether NHPA section 106 consultation is required. If NHPA section 106 consultation is required, the district engineer will notify the non- Federal applicant that he or she cannot begin the activity until section 106 consultation is completed. If the non- Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps. e) Prospective permittees should be aware that section 110k of the NHPA (54 U.S.C. 306113) prevents the Corps from granting a permit or other assistance to an applicant who, with intent to avoid the requirements of section 106 of the NHPA, has intentionally significantly adversely affected a historic property to which the permit would relate, or having legal power to prevent it, allowed such significant adverse effect to occur, unless the Corps, after consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), determines that circumstances justify granting such assistance despite the adverse effect created or permitted by the applicant. If circumstances justify granting the assistance, the Corps is required to notify the ACHP and provide documentation specifying the circumstances, the degree of damage to the integrity of any historic properties affected, and proposed mitigation. This documentation must include any views obtained from the applicant, SHPO/ THPO, appropriate Indian tribes if the undertaking occurs on or affects historic properties on tribal lands or affects properties of interest to those tribes, and other parties known to have a legitimate interest in the impacts to the permitted activity on historic properties. 21. Discovery of Previously Unknown Remains and Artifacts. If you discover any previously unknown historic, cultural or archeological remains and artifacts while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify the district engineer of what you have found, and to the maximum extent practicable, avoid construction activities that may affect the remains and artifacts until the required coordination has been completed. The district engineer will initiate the Federal, Tribal, and state coordination required to determine if the items or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 22. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include, NOAA-managed marine sanctuaries and marine monuments, and National Estuarine Research Reserves. The district engineer may designate, after notice and opportunity for public comment, additional waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance, such as outstanding national resource waters or state natural heritage sites. The district engineer may also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for public comment. a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States are not authorized by NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, and 52 for any activity within, or directly affecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 54, notification is required in accordance with general condition 32, for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 5 including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The district engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only after it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal. 23. Mitigation. The district engineer will consider the following factors when determining appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal: a) The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site). b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, or compensating for resource losses) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal. c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for- one ratio will be required for all wetland losses that exceed 1 10-acre and require preconstruction notification, unless the district engineer determines in writing that either some other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate or the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal, and provides an activity-specific waiver of this requirement. For wetland losses of 1 10-acre or less that require preconstruction notification, the district engineer may determine on a case-by-case basis that compensatory mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results in only minimal adverse environmental effects. d) For losses of streams or other open waters that require pre-construction notification, the district engineer may require compensatory mitigation to ensure that the activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation for losses of streams should be provided, if practicable, through stream rehabilitation, enhancement, or preservation, since streams are difficult-to- replace resources (see 33 CFR 332.3(e)(3)). e) Compensatory mitigation plans for NWP activities in or near streams or other open waters will normally include a requirement for the restoration or enhancement, maintenance, and legal protection (e.g., conservation easements) of riparian areas next to open waters. In some cases, the restoration or maintenance/protection of riparian areas may be the only compensatory mitigation required. Restored riparian areas should consist of native species. The width of the required riparian area will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normally, the riparian area will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream, but the district engineer may require slightly wider riparian areas to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. If it is not possible to restore or maintain/protect a riparian area on both sides of a stream, or if the waterbody is a lake or coastal waters, then restoring or maintaining/protecting a riparian area along a single bank or shoreline may be sufficient. Where both wetlands and open waters exist on the project site, the district engineer will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation e.g., riparian areas and/or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where riparian areas are determined to be the most appropriate form of minimization or compensatory mitigation, the district engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland losses. f) Compensatory mitigation projects provided to offset losses of aquatic resources must comply with the applicable provisions of 33 CFR part 332. 1) The prospective permittee is responsible for proposing an appropriate compensatory mitigation option if compensatory mitigation is necessary to ensure that the activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. For the NWPs, the preferred mechanism for providing compensatory mitigation is mitigation bank credits or in-lieu fee program credits (see 33 CFR 332.3(b)(2) and (3)). However, if an appropriate number and type of mitigation bank or in-lieu credits are not available at the time the PCN is submitted to the district engineer, the district engineer may approve the use of permittee-responsible mitigation. 2) The amount of compensatory mitigation required by the district engineer must be sufficient to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects (see 33 CFR 330.1(e)(3)). (See also 33 CFR 332.3(f)). 3) Since the likelihood of success is greater and the impacts to potentially valuable uplands are reduced, aquatic resource restoration should be the first compensatory mitigation option considered for permittee-responsible mitigation. 4) If permittee-responsible mitigation is the proposed option, the prospective permittee is responsible for submitting a mitigation plan. A conceptual or detailed mitigation plan may be used by the district engineer to make the decision on the NWP verification request, but a final mitigation plan that addresses the applicable requirements of 33 CFR 332.4(c)(2) through (14) must be approved by the district engineer before the permittee begins work in waters of the United States, unless the district engineer determines that prior approval of the final mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation (see 33 CFR 332.3(k)(3)). 5) If mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program credits are the proposed option, the mitigation plan only needs to address the baseline conditions at the impact site and the number of credits to be provided. 6) Compensatory mitigation requirements (e.g., resource type and amount to be provided as compensatory mitigation, site protection, ecological performance standards, monitoring requirements) may be addressed through conditions added to the Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 6 NWP authorization, instead of components of a compensatory mitigation plan (see 33 CFR 332.4(c)(1)(ii)). g) Compensatory mitigation will not be used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of the NWPs. For example, if an NWP has an acreage limit of 1 2-acre, it cannot be used to authorize any NWP activity resulting in the loss of greater than 1 2- acre of waters of the United States, even if compensatory mitigation is provided that replaces or restores some of the lost waters. However, compensatory mitigation can and should be used, as necessary, to ensure that an NWP activity already meeting the established acreage limits also satisfies the no more than minimal impact requirement for the NWPs. h) Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks, in-lieu fee programs, or permittee-responsible mitigation. When developing a compensatory mitigation proposal, the permittee must consider appropriate and practicable options consistent with the framework at 33 CFR 332.3(b). For activities resulting in the loss of marine or estuarine resources, permittee-responsible mitigation may be environmentally preferable if there are no mitigation banks or in-lieu fee programs in the area that have marine or estuarine credits available for sale or transfer to the permittee. For permittee-responsible mitigation, the special conditions of the NWP verification must clearly indicate the party or parties responsible for the implementation and performance of the compensatory mitigation project, and, if required, its long-term management. i) Where certain functions and services of waters of the United States are permanently adversely affected by a regulated activity, such as discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States that will convert a forested or scrub-shrub wetland to a herbaceous wetland in a permanently maintained utility line right-of-way, mitigation may be required to reduce the adverse environmental effects of the activity to the no more than minimal level. 24. Safety of Impoundment Structures. To ensure that all impoundment structures are safely designed, the district engineer may require non-Federal applicants to demonstrate that the structures comply with established state dam safety criteria or have been designed by qualified persons. The district engineer may also require documentation that the design has been independently reviewed by similarly qualified persons, and appropriate modifications made to ensure safety. 25. Water Quality. Where States and authorized Tribes, or EPA where applicable, have not previously certified compliance of an NWP with CWA section 401, individual 401 Water Quality Certification must be obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(c)). The district engineer or State or Tribe may require additional water quality management measures to ensure that the authorized activity does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality. 26. Coastal Zone Management. In coastal states where an NWP has not previously received a state coastal zone management consistency concurrence, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained, or a presumption of concurrence must occur (see 33 CFR 330.4(d)). The district engineer or a State may require additional measures to ensure that the authorized activity is consistent with state coastal zone management requirements. 27. Regional and Case-By-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have been added by the Division Engineer (see 33 CFR 330.4(e)) and with any case specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state, Indian Tribe, or U.S. EPA in its section 401 Water Quality Certification, or by the state in its Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determination. 28. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the United States authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit. For example, if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed under NWP 14, with associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP 13, the maximum acreage loss of waters of the United States for the total project cannot exceed 1 3-acre. 29. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications. If the permittee sells the property associated with a nationwide permit verification, the permittee may transfer the nationwide permit verification to the new owner by submitting a letter to the appropriate Corps district office to validate the transfer. A copy of the nationwide permit verification must be attached to the letter, and the letter must contain the following statement and signature: When the structures or work authorized by this nationwide permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this nationwide permit, including any special conditions, will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this nationwide permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. Transferee) Date) 30. Compliance Certification. Each permittee who receives an NWP verification letter from the Corps must provide a signed certification documenting completion of the authorized activity and implementation of any required compensatory mitigation. The success of any required permittee-responsible mitigation, including the achievement of ecological performance standards, will be addressed separately by the district engineer. The Corps will provide the permittee the certification document with the NWP verification letter. The certification document will include: a) A statement that the authorized activity was done in accordance with the NWP authorization, including any general, regional, or activity-specific conditions; Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 7 b) A statement that the implementation of any required compensatory mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. If credits from a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program are used to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements, the certification must include the documentation required by 33 CFR 332.3(l)(3) to confirm that the permittee secured the appropriate number and resource type of credits; and c) The signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the activity and mitigation. The completed certification document must be submitted to the district engineer within 30 days of completion of the authorized activity or the implementation of any required compensatory mitigation, whichever occurs later. 31. Activities Affecting Structures or Works Built by the United States. If an NWP activity also requires permission from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 because it will alter or temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) federally authorized Civil Works project (a USACE project’’), the prospective permittee must submit a preconstruction notification. See paragraph (b)(10) of general condition 32. An activity that requires section 408 permission is not authorized by NWP until the appropriate Corps office issues the section 408 permission to alter, occupy, or use the USACE project, and the district engineer issues a written NWP verification. 32. Pre-Construction Notification. a) Timing. Where required by the terms of the NWP, the prospective permittee must notify the district engineer by submitting a pre-construction notification PCN) as early as possible. The district engineer must determine if the PCN is complete within 30 calendar days of the date of receipt and, if the PCN is determined to be incomplete, notify the prospective permittee within that 30 day period to request the additional information necessary to make the PCN complete. The request must specify the information needed to make the PCN complete. As a general rule, district engineers will request additional information necessary to make the PCN complete only once. However, if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested information, then the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the PCN is still incomplete and the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested information has been received by the district engineer. The prospective permittee shall not begin the activity until either: 1) He or she is notified in writing by the district engineer that the activity may proceed under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the district or division engineer; or 2) 45 calendar days have passed from the district engineer’s receipt of the complete PCN and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the district or division engineer. However, if the permittee was required to notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 18 that listed species or critical habitat might be affected or are in the vicinity of the activity, or to notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 20 that the activity might have the potential to cause effects to historic properties, the permittee cannot begin the activity until receiving written notification from the Corps that there is ‘‘no effect’’ on listed species or ‘‘no potential to cause effects’’ on historic properties, or that any consultation required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (see 33 CFR 330.4(f)) and/or section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)) has been completed. Also, work cannot begin under NWPs 21, 49, or 50 until the permittee has received written approval from the Corps. If the proposed activity requires a written waiver to exceed specified limits of an NWP, the permittee may not begin the activity until the district engineer issues the waiver. If the district or division engineer notifies the permittee in writing that an individual permit is required within 45 calendar days of receipt of a complete PCN, the permittee cannot begin the activity until an individual permit has been obtained. Subsequently, the permittee’s right to proceed under the NWP may be modified, suspended, or revoked only in accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d)(2). b) Contents of Pre-Construction Notification: The PCN must be in writing and include the following information: 1) Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee; 2) Location of the proposed activity; 3) Identify the specific NWP or NWP(s) the prospective permittee wants to use to authorize the proposed activity; 4) A description of the proposed activity; the activity’s purpose; direct and indirect adverse environmental effects the activity would cause, including the anticipated amount of loss of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters expected to result from the NWP activity, in acres, linear feet, or other appropriate unit of measure; a description of any proposed mitigation measures intended to reduce the adverse environmental effects caused by the proposed activity; and any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity, including other separate and distant crossings for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but do not require pre-construction notification. The description of the proposed activity and any proposed mitigation measures should be sufficiently detailed to allow the district engineer to determine that the adverse environmental effects of the activity will be no more than minimal and to determine the need for compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures. For single and complete linear projects, the PCN must include the quantity of anticipated losses of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 8 waters for each single and complete crossing of those wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters. Sketches should be provided when necessary to show that the activity complies with the terms of the NWP. (Sketches usually clarify the activity and when provided results in a quicker decision. Sketches should contain sufficient detail to provide an illustrative description of the proposed activity (e.g., a conceptual plan), but do not need to be detailed engineering plans); 5) The PCN must include a delineation of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters, such as lakes and ponds, and perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral streams, on the project site. Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the Corps. The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the special aquatic sites and other waters on the project site, but there may be a delay if the Corps does the delineation, especially if the project site is large or contains many wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters. Furthermore, the 45 day period will not start until the delineation has been submitted to or completed by the Corps, as appropriate; 6) If the proposed activity will result in the loss of greater than 1 10-acre of wetlands and a PCN is required, the prospective permittee must submit a statement describing how the mitigation requirement will be satisfied, or explaining why the adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal and why compensatory mitigation should not be required. As an alternative, the prospective permittee may submit a conceptual or detailed mitigation plan. 7) For non-Federal permittees, if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat, the PCN must include the name(s) of those endangered or threatened species that might be affected by the proposed activity or utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed activity. For NWP activities that require pre- construction notification, Federal permittees must provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the Endangered Species Act; 8) For non-Federal permittees, if the NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to a historic property listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places, the PCN must state which historic property might have the potential to be affected by the proposed activity or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property. For NWP activities that require pre- construction notification, Federal permittees must provide documentation demonstrating compliance with section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; 9) For an activity that will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a ‘‘study river’’ for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, the PCN must identify the Wild and Scenic River or the ‘‘study river’’ (see general condition 16); and 10) For an activity that requires permission from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 because it will alter or temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers federally authorized civil works project, the pre-construction notification must include a statement confirming that the project proponent has submitted a written request for section 408 permission from the Corps office having jurisdiction over that USACE project. c) Form of Pre-Construction Notification: The standard individual permit application form (Form ENG 4345) may be used, but the completed application form must clearly indicate that it is an NWP PCN and must include all of the applicable information required in paragraphs (b)(1) through (10) of this general condition. A letter containing the required information may also be used. Applicants may provide electronic files of PCNs and supporting materials if the district engineer has established tools and procedures for electronic submittals. d) Agency Coordination: 1) The district engineer will consider any comments from Federal and state agencies concerning the proposed activity’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs and the need for mitigation to reduce the activity’s adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal. 2) Agency coordination is required for: (i) All NWP activities that require pre-construction notification and result in the loss of greater than 1 2- acre of waters of the United States; (ii) NWP 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52 activities that require pre-construction notification and will result in the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of stream bed; iii) NWP 13 activities in excess of 500 linear feet, fills greater than one cubic yard per running foot, or involve discharges of dredged or fill material into special aquatic sites; and (iv) NWP 54 activities in excess of 500 linear feet, or that extend into the waterbody more than 30 feet from the mean low water line in tidal waters or the ordinary high water mark in the Great Lakes. 3) When agency coordination is required, the district engineer will immediately provide (e.g., via email, facsimile transmission, overnight mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy of the complete PCN to the appropriate Federal or state offices (FWS, state natural resource or water quality agency, EPA, and, if appropriate, the NMFS). With the exception of NWP 37, these agencies will have 10 calendar days from the date the material is transmitted to notify the Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 9 district engineer via telephone, facsimile transmission, or email that they intend to provide substantive, site-specific comments. The comments must explain why the agency believes the adverse environmental effects will be more than minimal. If so contacted by an agency, the district engineer will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the preconstruction notification. The district engineer will fully consider agency comments received within the specified time frame concerning the proposed activity’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs, including the need for mitigation to ensure the net adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal. The district engineer will provide no response to the resource agency, except as provided below. The district engineer will indicate in the administrative record associated with each pre- construction notification that the resource agencies’ concerns were considered. For NWP 37, the emergency watershed protection and rehabilitation activity may proceed immediately in cases where there is an unacceptable hazard to life or a significant loss of property or economic hardship will occur. The district engineer will consider any comments received to decide whether the NWP 37 authorization should be modified, suspended, or revoked in accordance with the procedures at 33 CFR 330.5. 4) In cases of where the prospective permittee is not a Federal agency, the district engineer will provide a response to NMFS within 30 calendar days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat conservation recommendations, as required by section 305(b)(4)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. 4) Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps with either electronic files or multiple copies of preconstruction notifications to expedite agency coordination. C. District Engineer’s Decision 1. In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity, the district engineer will determine whether the activity authorized by the NWP will result in more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the public interest. If a project proponent requests authorization by a specific NWP, the district engineer should issue the NWP verification for that activity if it meets the terms and conditions of that NWP, unless he or she determines, after considering mitigation, that the proposed activity will result in more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment and other aspects of the public interest and exercises discretionary authority to require an individual permit for the proposed activity. For a linear project, this determination will include an evaluation of the individual crossings of waters of the United States to determine whether they individually satisfy the terms and conditions of the NWP(s), as well as the cumulative effects caused by all of the crossings authorized by NWP. If an applicant requests a waiver of the 300 linear foot limit on impacts to streams or of an otherwise applicable limit, as provided for in NWPs 13, 21, 29, 36, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, or 54, the district engineer will only grant the waiver upon a written determination that the NWP activity will result in only minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects. For those NWPs that have a waivable 300 linear foot limit for losses of intermittent and ephemeral stream bed and a 1 2-acre limit (i.e., NWPs 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52), the loss of intermittent and ephemeral stream bed, plus any other losses of jurisdictional waters and wetlands, cannot exceed 1 2- acre. 2. When making minimal adverse environmental effects determinations the district engineer will consider the direct and indirect effects caused by the NWP activity. He or she will also consider the cumulative adverse environmental effects caused by activities authorized by NWP and whether those cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal. The district engineer will also consider site specific factors, such as the environmental setting in the vicinity of the NWP activity, the type of resource that will be affected by the NWP activity, the functions provided by the aquatic resources that will be affected by the NWP activity, the degree or magnitude to which the aquatic resources perform those functions, the extent that aquatic resource functions will be lost as a result of the NWP activity (e.g., partial or complete loss), the duration of the adverse effects temporary or permanent), the importance of the aquatic resource functions to the region (e.g., watershed or ecoregion), and mitigation required by the district engineer. If an appropriate functional or condition assessment method is available and practicable to use, that assessment method may be used by the district engineer to assist in the minimal adverse environmental effects determination. The district engineer may add case-specific special conditions to the NWP authorization to address site-specific environmental concerns. 3. If the proposed activity requires a PCN and will result in a loss of greater than 1 10-acre of wetlands, the prospective permittee should submit a mitigation proposal with the PCN. Applicants may also propose compensatory mitigation for NWP activities with smaller impacts, or for impacts to other types of waters (e.g., streams). The district engineer will consider any proposed compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures the applicant has included in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal. The compensatory mitigation proposal may be either conceptual or detailed. If the district engineer determines that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal, after considering mitigation, the district engineer will notify the permittee and include any activity-specific conditions in the NWP verification the district engineer deems necessary. Conditions for compensatory mitigation requirements must comply with the appropriate provisions at 33 CFR 332.3(k). The district engineer must approve the final mitigation plan before the permittee commences work in waters of the United States, unless the district engineer determines that prior approval of the final mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation. If the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the PCN, the district engineer will Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 10 expeditiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan. The district engineer must review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan within 45 calendar days of receiving a complete PCN and determine whether the proposed mitigation would ensure the NWP activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. If the net adverse environmental effects of the NWP activity (after consideration of the mitigation proposal) are determined by the district engineer to be no more than minimal, the district engineer will provide a timely written response to the applicant. The response will state that the NWP activity can proceed under the terms and conditions of the NWP, including any activity-specific conditions added to the NWP authorization by the district engineer. 4. If the district engineer determines that the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are more than minimal, then the district engineer will notify the applicant either: (a) That the activity does not qualify for authorization under the NWP and instruct the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an individual permit; (b) that the activity is authorized under the NWP subject to the applicant’s submission of a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal; or (c) that the activity is authorized under the NWP with specific modifications or conditions. Where the district engineer determines that mitigation is required to ensure no more than minimal adverse environmental effects, the activity will be authorized within the 45-day PCN period (unless additional time is required to comply with general conditions 18, 20, and/or 31, or to evaluate PCNs for activities authorized by NWPs 21, 49, and 50), with activity-specific conditions that state the mitigation requirements. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or detailed mitigation plan or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal. When compensatory mitigation is required, no work in waters of the United States may occur until the district engineer has approved a specific mitigation plan or has determined that prior approval of a final mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation. D.Further Information 1. District Engineers have authority to determine if an activity complies with the terms and conditions of an NWP. 2.NWPs do not obviate the need to obtain other federal, state, or local permits, approvals, or authorizations required by law. 3.NWPs do not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. 4. NWPs do not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. 5. NWPs do not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project (see general condition 31). E.Definitions Best management practices (BMPs): Policies, practices, procedures, or structures implemented to mitigate the adverse environmental effects on surface water quality resulting from development. BMPs are categorized as structural or non- structural. Compensatory mitigation: The restoration (re-establishment or rehabilitation), establishment (creation), enhancement, and/or in certain circumstances preservation of aquatic resources for the purposes of offsetting unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization has been achieved. Currently serviceable: Useable as is or with some maintenance, but not so degraded as to essentially require reconstruction. Direct effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and occur at the same time and place. Discharge: The term ‘‘discharge’’ means any discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Ecological reference: A model used to plan and design an aquatic habitat and riparian area restoration, enhancement, or establishment activity under NWP 27. An ecological reference may be based on the structure, functions, and dynamics of an aquatic habitat type or a riparian area type that currently exists in the region where the proposed NWP 27 activity is located. Alternatively, an ecological reference may be based on a conceptual model for the aquatic habitat type or riparian area type to be restored, enhanced, or established as a result of the proposed NWP 27 activity. An ecological reference takes into account the range of variation of the aquatic habitat type or riparian area type in the region. Enhancement: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of an aquatic resource to heighten, intensify, or improve a specific aquatic resource function(s). Enhancement results in the gain of selected aquatic resource function(s), but may also lead to a decline in other aquatic resource function(s). Enhancement does not result in a gain in aquatic resource area. Ephemeral stream: An ephemeral stream has flowing water only during, and for a short duration after, precipitation events in a typical year. Ephemeral stream beds are located above the water table year-round. Groundwater is not a source of water for the stream. Runoff from rainfall is the primary source of water for stream flow. Establishment (creation): The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics present to develop an aquatic resource that did not previously exist at an upland site. Establishment results in a gain in aquatic resource area. High Tide Line: The line of intersection of the land with the water’s surface at the maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high tide line may be determined, in the absence of actual data, by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a more or less continuous deposit of fine shell or debris on the foreshore or berm, other physical markings or characteristics, vegetation lines, tidal gages, or other suitable means that delineate the general height reached by a rising tide. The line encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but does not include storm surges in which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach of the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 11 strong winds such as those accompanying a hurricane or other intense storm. Historic Property: Any prehistoric or historic district, site including archaeological site), building, structure, or other object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and that meet the National Register criteria (36 CFR part 60). Independent utility: A test to determine what constitutes a single and complete non-linear project in the Corps Regulatory Program. A project is considered to have independent utility if it would be constructed absent the construction of other projects in the project area. Portions of a multi-phase project that depend upon other phases of the project do not have independent utility. Phases of a project that would be constructed even if the other phases were not built can be considered as separate single and complete projects with independent utility. Indirect effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. Intermittent stream: An intermittent stream has flowing water during certain times of the year, when groundwater provides water for stream flow. During dry periods, intermittent streams may not have flowing water. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. Loss of waters of the United States: Waters of the United States that are permanently adversely affected by filling, flooding, excavation, or drainage because of the regulated activity. Permanent adverse effects include permanent discharges of dredged or fill material that change an aquatic area to dry land, increase the bottom elevation of a waterbody, or change the use of a waterbody. The acreage of loss of waters of the United States is a threshold measurement of the impact to jurisdictional waters for determining whether a project may qualify for an NWP; it is not a net threshold that is calculated after considering compensatory mitigation that may be used to offset losses of aquatic functions and services. The loss of stream bed includes the acres or linear feet of stream bed that are filled or excavated as a result of the regulated activity. Waters of the United States temporarily filled, flooded, excavated, or drained, but restored to pre- construction contours and elevations after construction, are not included in the measurement of loss of waters of the United States. Impacts resulting from activities that do not require Department of the Army authorization, such as activities eligible for exemptions under section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act, are not considered when calculating the loss of waters of the United States. Navigable waters: Waters subject to section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. These waters are defined at 33 CFR part 329. Non-tidal wetland: A non-tidal wetland is a wetland that is not subject to the ebb and flow of tidal waters. Nontidal wetlands contiguous to tidal waters are located landward of the high tide line (i.e., spring high tide line). Open water: For purposes of the NWPs, an open water is any area that in a year with normal patterns of precipitation has water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that an ordinary high water mark can be determined. Aquatic vegetation within the area of flowing or standing water is either non-emergent, sparse, or absent. Vegetated shallows are considered to be open waters. Examples of ‘‘open waters’’ include rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds. Ordinary High Water Mark: An ordinary high water mark is a line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics, or by other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas. Perennial stream: A perennial stream has flowing water year- round during a typical year. The water table is located above the stream bed for most of the year. Groundwater is the primary source of water for stream flow. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. Practicable: Available and capable of being done after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes. Pre-construction notification: A request submitted by the project proponent to the Corps for confirmation that a particular activity is authorized by nationwide permit. The request may be a permit application, letter, or similar document that includes information about the proposed work and its anticipated environmental effects. Preconstruction notification may be required by the terms and conditions of a nationwide permit, or by regional conditions. A pre- construction notification may be voluntarily submitted in cases where preconstruction notification is not required and the project proponent wants confirmation that the activity is authorized by nationwide permit. Preservation: The removal of a threat to, or preventing the decline of, aquatic resources by an action in or near those aquatic resources. This term includes activities commonly associated with the protection and maintenance of aquatic resources through the implementation of appropriate legal and physical mechanisms. Preservation does not result in a gain of aquatic resource area or functions. Protected tribal resources: Those natural resources and properties of traditional or customary religious or cultural importance, either on or off Indian lands, retained by, or reserved by or for, Indian tribes through treaties, statutes, judicial decisions, or executive orders, including tribal trust resources. Re-establishment: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural/historic functions to a former aquatic resource. Reestablishment results in rebuilding a former aquatic resource and results in a gain in aquatic resource area and functions. Rehabilitation: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing natural/historic functions to a degraded aquatic resource. Rehabilitation results in a gain in aquatic resource function, but does not result in a gain in aquatic resource area. Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 12 Restoration: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural/historic functions to a former or degraded aquatic resource. For the purpose of tracking net gains in aquatic resource area, restoration is divided into two categories: Reestablishment and rehabilitation. Riffle and pool complex: Riffle and pool complexes are special aquatic sites under the 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Riffle and pool complexes sometimes characterize steep gradient sections of streams. Such stream sections are recognizable by their hydraulic characteristics. The rapid movement of water over a course substrate in riffles results in a rough flow, a turbulent surface, and high dissolved oxygen levels in the water. Pools are deeper areas associated with riffles. A slower stream velocity, a streaming flow, a smooth surface, and a finer substrate characterize pools. Riparian areas: Riparian areas are lands next to streams, lakes, and estuarine-marine shorelines. Riparian areas are transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, through which surface and subsurface hydrology connects riverine, lacustrine, estuarine, and marine waters with their adjacent wetlands, non-wetland waters, or uplands. Riparian areas provide a variety of ecological functions and services and help improve or maintain local water quality. (See general condition 23.) Shellfish seeding: The placement of shellfish seed and/or suitable substrate to increase shellfish production. Shellfish seed consists of immature individual shellfish or individual shellfish attached to shells or shell fragments (i.e., spat on shell). Suitable substrate may consist of shellfish shells, shell fragments, or other appropriate materials placed into waters for shellfish habitat. Single and complete linear project: A linear project is a project constructed for the purpose of getting people, goods, or services from a point of origin to a terminal point, which often involves multiple crossings of one or more waterbodies at separate and distant locations. The term “single and complete project” is defined as that portion of the total linear project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers that includes all crossings of a single water of the United States i.e., a single waterbody) at a specific location. For linear projects crossing a single or multiple waterbodies several times at separate and distant locations, each crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization. However, individual channels in a braided stream or river, or individual arms of a large, irregularly shaped wetland or lake, etc., are not separate waterbodies, and crossings of such features cannot be considered separately. Single and complete non-linear project: For non-linear projects, the term “single and complete project” is defined at 33 CFR 330.2(i) as the total project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers. A single and complete non-linear project must have independent utility (see definition of “independent utility”). Single and complete non-linear projects may not be piecemealed” to avoid the limits in an NWP authorization. Stormwater management: Stormwater management is the mechanism for controlling stormwater runoff for the purposes of reducing downstream erosion, water quality degradation, and flooding and mitigating the adverse effects of changes in land use on the aquatic environment. Stormwater management facilities: Stormwater management facilities are those facilities, including but not limited to, stormwater retention and detention ponds and best management practices, which retain water for a period of time to control runoff and/or improve the quality (i.e., by reducing the concentration of nutrients, sediments, hazardous substances and other pollutants) of stormwater runoff. Stream bed: The substrate of the stream channel between the ordinary high water marks. The substrate may be bedrock or inorganic particles that range in size from clay to boulders. Wetlands contiguous to the stream bed, but outside of the ordinary high water marks, are not considered part of the stream bed. Stream channelization: The manipulation of a stream’s course, condition, capacity, or location that causes more than minimal interruption of normal stream processes. A channelized stream remains a water of the United States. Structure: An object that is arranged in a definite pattern of organization. Examples of structures include, without limitation, any pier, boat dock, boat ramp, wharf, dolphin, weir, boom, breakwater, bulkhead, revetment, riprap, jetty, artificial island, artificial reef, permanent mooring structure, power transmission line, permanently moored floating vessel, piling, aid to navigation, or any other manmade obstacle or obstruction. Tidal wetland: A tidal wetland is a jurisdictional wetland that is inundated by tidal waters. Tidal waters rise and fall in a predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. Tidal waters end where the rise and fall of the water surface can no longer be practically measured in a predictable rhythm due to masking by other waters, wind, or other effects. Tidal wetlands are Tribal lands: Any lands title to which is either: (1) Held in trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or individual; or (2) held by any Indian tribe or individual subject to restrictions by the United States against alienation. Tribal rights: Those rights legally accruing to a tribe or tribes by virtue of inherent sovereign authority, unextinguished aboriginal title, treaty, statute, judicial decisions, executive order or agreement, and that give rise to legally enforceable remedies. Vegetated shallows: Vegetated shallows are special aquatic sites under the 404(b)(1) Guidelines. They are areas that are permanently inundated and under normal circumstances have rooted aquatic vegetation, such as seagrasses in marine and estuarine systems and a variety of vascular rooted plants in freshwater systems. Waterbody: For purposes of the NWPs, a waterbody is a jurisdictional water of the United States. If a wetland is adjacent to a waterbody determined to be a water of the United States, that waterbody and any adjacent wetlands are considered together as a single aquatic unit (see 33 CFR 328.4(c)(2)). Examples of ‘‘waterbodies’’ include streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wetlands. Nationwide Permit 46 Summary Page 13 1 January 11, 2017 2017 Regional Conditions to Nationwide Permits in the State of Colorado U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District Omaha District Sacramento District Regional Conditions Applicable to Specific Nationwide Permits within the State of Colorado 1. Nationwide Permit No. 12: Utility Line Activities. Notification to the District Engineer (DE) in accordance with General Condition (GC) No. 32, pre- construction notification (PCN) is required for utility line activities that propose open trenching in perennial waters or for the purpose of creating a water intake. 2. Nationwide Permit No. 13: Bank Stabilization. PCN is required for bank stabilization activities that are necessary for erosion prevention in streams with an average width of less than 20 feet (measured between the ordinary high water marks (OHWM)). Bank stabilization activities in these small streams are limited to the placement of no more than ¼ cubic yard of fill material per linear foot below the plane of the OHWM unless the Corps determines on a case-by-case basis that the use of larger or greater quantities of material is appropriate. 3. Nationwide Permit No. 23: Approved Categorical Exclusions. PCN is required for all projects utilizing Categorical Exclusions. 4. Nationwide Permit No. 27: Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Establishment, and Enhancement Activities. This permit is revoked for activities in which the project purpose is fishery enhancement in perennial streams. These types of projects may qualify for authorization under Regional General Permit No. 12 for Aquatic Habitat Improvement for Stream Channels in Colorado. a. Channel realignment is not authorized by this permit unless it is demonstrated that the realignment is consistent with the natural morphological evolution of the stream. b. The use of concrete/grouting is not allowed in perennial streams unless waived in writing by the DE. c. The construction of water parks (e.g. kayak courses) and flood control projects are not authorized by this permit. Regional Conditions Applicable to All Nationwide Permits within the State of Colorado 5. Important Spawning Areas. Activities are not authorized by any nationwide permit except after case-by- case review and consultation with Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) if the activities would adversely affect important spawning areas or would be conducted in these waters during trout and Kokanee spawning seasons. Bio-engineering techniques, such as native riparian shrub plantings, are required for all bank protection activities that exceed 50 linear feet in important spawning areas. For activities located in these important spawning areas, PCN is required and consultation with CPW must be conducted in accordance with the timeframes established in GC 32 (Pre-Construction Notification). Important spawning areas are considered Gold Medal Waters in Colorado (Attachment 2). 2 January 11, 2017 NOTE: Pre-application consultation with the CPW, preferably on-site, is highly recommended. Providing documentation of pre-application consultation with CPW, stating that CPW has reviewed the proposed project and has no concerns, will be helpful in project evaluation by the Corps. Please visit the following state website to determine the appropriate CPW office for coordination: http://cpw.state.co.us. 6. Fens. All nationwide permits, with the exception of 3, 5, 6, 20, 27, 32, 37, and 38, are revoked for activities located in fens and wetlands adjacent to fens. PCN is required for activities proposed for authorization by Nationwide Permits. The PCN will address potential adverse effects to fen hydrology. The permittee may not begin the activity until the Corps determ ines the adverse environmental effects are minimal. A fen is defined as a groundwater-fed wetland with saturated organic soil (greater than or equal to 16 inches in thickness) that is classified as a histosol in the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (Version 8.0, 2016). A copy of the document can be obtained from the NRCS at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_053171.pdf . Note: A fen may be part of a larger aquatic system (fen complex) where wetlands and other waters adjacent to the fen may provide a critical source of hydrology necessary for sustaining the fen. 7. Springs. PCN is required for all Nationwide Permits if the activities occur within 100 feet of the discharge point of a spring. The Corps will determine if the proposed project will have more than a minimal effect to the spring and may require an Individual Permit or project modification to reduce/eliminate the spring impacts. For the purposes of this regional condition, a spring is defined as any location where groundwater flow emanates from a distinct point. Springs do not include seeps or other groundwater discharge areas where there is no distinct point source. 8. Suitable Fill. A PCN is required for the use of broken concrete as fill material within the State of Colorado. Permittees must demonstrate that soft engineering methods utilizing native or non-man made materials are not practicable (with respect to cost, existing technology, and logistics), before broken concrete is allowed as suitable fill. Use of broken concrete with exposed rebar is prohibited. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following additional information relates to minimization of impacts to jurisdictional waters of the United States and compliance with the General Conditions: 1. Permittees are reminded that appropriate erosion and sediment controls are required in accordance with GC No. 12 in order to properly stabilize the site and prevent erosion and siltation into wetlands and other waters downstream. Streambed material or other small aggregate material placed alone for bank stabilization will not meet GC No. 12. 2.Permittee best management practices.In order to prevent the spread of invasive and/or nuisance species (e.g., Asian Clam, Grand Valley Asian Tapeworm, Green River Mud Snail, New Zealand Mud Snail), the permittee is strongly encouraged to clean heavy equipment prior to and after construction if the equipment was previously used in another stream, river, lake, pond or wetland within 10 days of initiating work. The following are recommended methods for preventing the spread of invasive aquatic organisms: Remove all mud and debris from equipment (tracks, turrets, buckets, drags, teeth, etc.) and spray/soak equipment with a 1:15 solution of disinfection solution containing the following ingredients: Dialkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (5-10% by weight); 3 January 11, 2017 Alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride (5-10% by weight); Nonyl phenol ethoxylate (5-10% by weight); Sodium sesquicarbonate (1-5%); and, Tetrasodium ethylene diaminetetraacetate (1-15%) The equipment should be kept moist for at least 10 minutes, and rinsate should be managed as a solid waste in accordance with local, county, state, or federal regulations. Alternately, equipment, hand tools, boots and any other equipment that was previously used in a river, stream, lake, pond, or wetland prior to moving the equipment to another water body may be disinfected using the following methods: Spray/soak equipment with water greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 minutes. Sanitize water suction hoses and water transportation tanks (using methods described above) and discard rinse water at an appropriately permitted disposal facility. 3.Designated Critical Resource Waters. Within the State of Colorado, the waters listed in Attachment 1 are designated as Critical Resource Waters. In accordance with GC 22, the discharge of dredged or fill material is not authorized by the following nationwide permits in these waters or their adjacent wetlands: NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, A and B. In addition, in accordance with GC 32, notification to the DE is required for the use of the following nationwide permits in these waters and their adjacent wetlands: NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37 and 38. 4.Gold Medal Waters. Within the State of Colorado, the waters listed in Attachment 2 are designated as Gold Medal Waters. Requirements for projects located in these waters and their adjacent wetlands are set forth in RC 5 above. 4 January 11, 2017 ATTACHMENT 1 DESIGNATED CRITICAL RESOURCE WATERS The Colorado Water Quality Control Division designates Critical Resource Waters (Outstanding Waters) within the State of Colorado. Please note that the following list is subject to change and typically changes on an annual basis. For the most current list, or for more information on specific designations within these watersheds and their tributaries, please refer to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission website: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/wqcc or Water Quality Control Division’s website: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cdphe/clean-water-gis-maps Animas and Florida River Basins. All tributaries to the Animas River and Florida River, including all wetlands, which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. Hermosa Creek, including all tributaries, from the source to immediately below the confluence with Long Hollow, except for the East Fork of Hermosa Creek. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Animas River and Florida River which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. This segment includes Lillie Lake, Castilleja Lake, City Reservoir, Emerald Lake, Ruby Lake, Balsam Lake, Garfield Lake, Vestal Lake, Eldorado Lake, Highland Mary Lakes, Verde Lakes, Lost Lake, and Crater Lake. Bear Creek Basin. The main stem of Bear Creek and all tributaries, lakes, and reservoirs, including wetlands, within the Mt. Evans Wilderness Area. Big Thompson River Basin. The main stem of the Big Thompson River, including all tributaries, lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP). Blue River Basin. North Fork of the Swan River, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the confluence with the Swan River. All tributaries to the Blue River, including wetlands within the Eagle Nest and Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs within the Eagle Nest and Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness Areas. Boulder Creek Basin. All tributaries to Boulder Creek, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area. Cache la Poudre River Basin. All tributaries to the Cache La Poudre River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within RMNP and Rawah, Neota, Comanche Peak, and Cache La Poudre Wilderness Areas. Clear Creek Basin. All tributaries to Clear Creek, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within Mt. Evans Wilderness Area. San Luis Valley (Closed Basin). All tributaries in the Closed Basin, including wetlands, lakes, and reservoirs, located within the La Garita Wilderness Area. The main stem of Sand Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the mouth. The main stem of Medano Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the mouth Colorado River Basin. The main stem of the Colorado River, including all tributaries and wetlands, located within or flowing into RMNP. All tributaries to the Colorado River and Frasier River within RMNP and within the Never Summer, Indian Peaks, Byers, Vasquez, Eagles Nest, and Flat Top Wilderness Areas. Main stem of Northwater Creek and Trapper Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from their source to the confluence with the East Fork of Parachute Creek. East Middle Fork of Parachute Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands from the source to the confluence with Middle Fork of Parachute Creek. 5 January 11, 2017 Battlement Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from its source to a point immediately downstream boundary of BLM lands. Main stem of Rapid Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to a point immediately below the confluence with Cottonwood Creek including Kruzen Springs. Dolores River Basin. All tributaries to the Dolores River and West Dolores River, including all wetlands, tributaries, which are within the Lizard Head Wilderness area.main stem of Rio Lado from the source to the confluence with the Dolores River. Main stem of Spring Creek from the source to the confluence with Stoner Creek. Main stem of Little Taylor Creek from the source to the confluence with Taylor Creek. All lakes, and reservoirs tributary to the Dolores River and West Dolores River, which are within the Lizard Head Wilderness area. This segment includes Navajo Lake. Eagle River Basin. All tributaries to the Eagle River system, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Eagle Nest and Holy Cross Wilderness Areas of the Gore Range. Abrams Creek, including all tributaries and wetlands, from the source to the eastern boundary of the BLM lands. Fountain Creek Basin. Severy Creek, including all tributaries, from the source to a point just upstream of where the Forest Service Road 330 crosses the stream. Bear Creek, including all tributaries, from the source to a point upstream of GPS coordinated N3847682, W10454917 (this location is at elevation 8,200 feet above sea level at a 250 degree angle and 3,000 feet from the trailhead of the Mount Buckhorn Trail off High Drive). Upper Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to the Gunnison River, including and wetlands, within the La Garita, Powderhorn, West Elk, Collegiate Peaks, Maroon Bells, Fossil Ridge, or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. All tributaries and wetlands from North Beaver Creek to Meyers Gulch, from the West Elk Wilderness boundary to their confluences with Blue Mesa Reservoir, Morrow Point Reservoir, or the Gunnison River, excluding Steuben Creek, North Willow Creek, and Soap Creek. All lakes and reservoirs that are tributary to the Gunnison River and within the La Garita, Powderhorn, West Elk, Collegiate Peaks, Maroon Bells, Raggeds, Fossil Ridge, or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. Lower Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to the Smith Fork, including all wetlands, which are within the West Elk Wilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Smith Fork, and are within the West Elk Wilderness Area. North Fork of the Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to North Fork of the Gunnison River, including all wetlands, within the West Elk or Raggeds Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs that are tributary to the North Fork of the Gunnison River and within the West Elk or Raggeds Wilderness areas. Laramie River Basin. All tributaries to the Laramie River system, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Rawah Wilderness Area. Los Pinos River Basin. All tributaries to the Los Pinos River, including all wetlands, which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Los Pinos River which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. This includes Granite Lake, Divide Lakes, Elk Lake, Flint Lakes, Moon Lake, Rock Lake, Betty Lake, Lost Lake, Hidden Lake, Vallecito Lake, Eldorado Lake, Trinity Lake, Leviathan Lake, Sunlight Lake, Hazel Lake, Columbine Lake, and Emerald Lake. Mancos River Basin. All tributaries of the Mancos River located within Mesa Verde National Park. North Fork of the Gunnison River Basin. All tributaries to North Fork of the Gunnison River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the West Elk and Raggeds Wilderness Areas. 6 January 11, 2017 North Platte River Basin. All tributaries to the North Platte River and Encampment Rivers, including lakes and reservoirs. All wetlands located within the Mount Zirkle, Never Summer, and Platte River Wilderness Areas. Piedra River Basin. All tributaries to the Piedra River, including all wetlands, which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Piedra River which are within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. This segment includes Window Lake, Monument Lake, Hossick Lake, and Williams Lakes. Rio Grande Basin. All tributaries to the Rio Grande, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Weminuche Wilderness Area. Roaring Fork River. All tributaries of the Roaring Fork River system, including lakes and reservoirs, located within the Maroon Bells/Snowmass, Holy Cross, Raggeds, Collegiate Peaks, and Hunter/Fryingpan Wilderness Areas. San Juan River Basin. All tributaries to the San Juan River, Rio Blanco, and Navajo River including all wetlands which are within the Weminuche Wilderness area and South San Juan Wilderness Area. All lakes and reservoirs which are tributary to the San Juan River, Rio Blanco, and Navajo River and located within the Weminuche Wilderness Area and South San Juan W ilderness Area. This segment includes Archuleta Lake, Spruce Lakes, Turkey Creek Lake, Fourmile Lake, Upper Fourmile Lake, Crater Lake, Quartz Lake, Fish Lake, and Opal Lake. San Miguel River Basin. All tributaries, including wetlands, to the San Miguel River, and within the boundaries of the Lizard Head, or Mount Sneffels Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the San Miguel River and within the boundaries of the Lizard Head, or Mount Sneffels Wilderness Areas. South Platte River Basin. All tributaries to the South Platte River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Lost Creek and Mt. Evans Wilderness Areas. St. Vrain Creek Basin. All tributaries to St. Vrain Creek, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Indian Peaks Wilderness Areas and RMNP. Uncompahgre River Basin. All tributaries to the Uncompahgre River, including all wetlands, which are within the Mt. Sneffels or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. All lakes and reservoirs tributary to the Uncompahgre River and within the Mt. Sneffels or Uncompahgre Wilderness Areas. White River Basin. All tributaries to the White River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within the Flat Tops Wilderness Area, including Trapper's Lake. Yampa River Basin. All tributaries to the Yampa River, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands, located within Zirkle, Flat Tops, and Sarvis Creek Wilderness Areas. 7 January 11, 2017 ATTCHMENT 2 GOLD MEDAL WATERS The following list of important spawning areas has been defined as Gold Medal Waters by the State of Colorado. As a reminder, according to RC 5 above, PCN is required for all proposed nationwide permit activities in these waters; consultation with CPW must be conducted in accordance with the timeframes established in GC 32. NOTE: This list of Gold Medal Waters is subject to change. For the most current list, please refer to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Colorado Fishing Brochure available on the CPW website http://cpw.state.co.us/aboutus/Pages/RegulationsBrochures.aspx) Fishing Brochure or contact any CPW or Corps office in Colorado. GOLD MEDAL LAKES: North Delaney Butte Lake in Jackson County. Spinney Mountain Reservoir in Park County. Steamboat Lake in Routt County. GOLD MEDAL STREAMS: Animas River from Lightner Creek to Rivera Crossing Bridge. Arkansas River from the confluence with the Lake Fork of the Arkansas, near Leadville, downstream to Parkdale at the Hwy. 50 bridge crossing above the Royal Gorge. Blue River from Dillon Reservoir Dam to Green Mountain Reservoir inlet; and From Green Mountain Reservoir dam to Colorado River confluence. Colorado River from Fraser River to Troublesome Creek confluence. Also, the 24 mile reach from the confluence with Canyon Creek, at the mouth of Gore Canyon, downstream to the confluence of Rock Creek, near the town of McCoy. Fryingpan River from Ruedi Reservoir dam to Roaring Fork River Confluence. Gore Creek from Red Sandstone Creek to Eagle River confluence. Gunnison River from the upper boundary of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument downstream to the confluence with the North Fork of the Gunnison River. North Platte River from the Routt National Forest boundary to the Wyoming border. Rio Grande from Farmer’s Union Canal upstream to the upper boundary of Collier State Wildlife Area. Roaring Fork River from the confluence with the Crystal River downstream to the confluence with the Colorado River. South Platte River:The Middle Fork of the South Platte River downstream from U.S. Highway 285, the South Fork of the South Platte River downstream from the outlet at Antero Reservoir, and from the confluence of the Middle and South Forks of the South Platte River downstream to the inlet of Spinney Mountain Reservoir. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION Permit File Name: Willows Apartments at Grand Park project Action ID: SPK-2002-75601 Nationwide Permit Number: 46 Permittee: Grand Park Development, LLC Attn: Mr. Clark Lipscomb Post Office Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 clark@cstoneholdings.com County: Grand County Date of Verification: May 21, 2021 Within 30 days after completion of the activity authorized by this permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District Northwest Colorado Branch 400 Rood Avenue, Room 224 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 SPA-RD-CO@usace.army.mil Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit your authorization may be suspended, modified, or revoked. If you have any questions about this certification, please contact the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above-referenced permit, including all the required mitigation, was completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit verification. Permittee Signature Date Encl 2 4 FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG connecting & enhancing communities March 8, 2021 Mr. Clark Lipscomb Grand Park Development, LLC PO Box 30 Winter Park, Colorado 80482 Reference: Grand Park Planning Area 2W — Trip Generation Review FHU Reference No. 107104-05 Z.02-1 Dear Mr. Lipscomb: It is our current understanding that you are in the process of starting the next phase of development of Planning Area 2W of the Grand Park development in Fraser, Colorado. The current Planning Area 2W development plan includes 204 multifamily residential dwelling units in addition to the 55 units currently built within Planning Area 2W. Per your request, this letter addresses whether the current development plan is consistent with previous traffic studies prepared for the area. The proposed development of Planning Area 2W has previously been evaluated in the 2004 RENDEzVOUS Traffic Impact Analysis (Master TIA). The Master TIA evaluated potential impacts of 686 detached residential dwelling units, 1857 attached residential dwelling units, 1278 lodging units and 395.8 thousand square feet of commercial development on the surrounding roadway network and identified recommended roadway and intersection improvements. Planning Area 2W included a total of 250 attached dwelling units, 278 lodging units and 100,000 square feet of commercial retail use. Based on the trip generation rates used in the TIA, the proposed 250 attached and 9 detached dwelling units would generate fewer vehicle -trips than the original proposed residential and retail uses. Table 1 provides a trip generation comparison between the Master TIA and the current plan, based on the number and type of proposed residential units. Trip generation rates are consistent with rates used in the Master TIA. Table 1. Planning Area 2W Trip Generation Comparison 2W Scenario Land Use Quantity Daily Trips' AM Peak Hour'PM Peak Hour' In Out Total In Out Total Master TIA Commercial 100 KSF 3,000 42 24 662 143 143 286 Attached Residences 250 Units 1,250 23 60 832 73 38 I 1 1 Lodging 278 Units 1,112 21 64 86 78 42 120 Total 5,362 86 148 235 294 223 517 Current Plan Attached Residences 250 Units 1,250 23 60 83 70 38 108 Detached Residences 9 Units 72 2 5 7 4 2 6 Total 1,322 25 65 90 74 40 114 Rates used to calculate trip generation estimates are consistent with rates utilized and documented in the 2004 RENDEzVOUS Traffic Impact Analysis. See attachment for information. 6400 S FIDDLERS GREEN CIRCLE, SUITE 1500 1 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 801 1 1 303.721.1440 1 WWW.FHUENG.COM March 8, 2021 Mr. Clark Lipscomb Page 2 As shown on Table 1, Planning Area 2W would generate approximately 4,040 (approximately 75 percent) fewer daily vehicle trips, 144 fewer vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 403 fewer vehicle trips in the PM peak hour. Because Planning Area 2W is projected to generate fewer trips under the current development plan in comparison to the Master TIA, it is reasonable to assume that the site roadway network and accesses to US Highway 40 included in the Master TIA are sufficient to accommodate the proposed development of Planning Area 2W without creating operational deficiencies. It has been concluded that the current development plans for Planning Area 2W are generally consistent with previous traffic studies and no new analyses are necessary at this time to address the changes in the land use with the Town of Fraser. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Lyle E. DeVries. PE, PTOE Principal Attachment: Trip Generation Rates and results from 2004 RENDEzVOUS Traffic Impact Analysis, pp. 10-11 Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Page 10 B. Trip Generation Table 3 summarizes the trip generation rates used in this analysis. Daily trips to be generated by single and multi-family residences within Rendezvous were estimated based on standard trip generation rates published by Grand County. Information included in the Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis was used as the basis for the Lodging trip generation rates. The rate of 30 vehicle-trips per day per 1,000 square feet of commercial space was based on information from Pitkin County research. Documentation of these trip generation rates is included in Appendix A. The AM and PM peak hour rates for the single and multi-family residential properties were calculated based on peak hour percentages determined at Snowmass Village, a mountain area with many similarities to the Fraser Valley. The peak hour rates for other uses were extracted from earlier Maryvale analyses. Table 3. Trip Generation Rates Residential Rates (Trips per Dwelling Unit) Single-Family Residences Multi-Family Residences Lodging Commercial Rates Trips per 1,000 SF) Daily 81 51 42 30 4 AM Peak Hour 0.68 (8.5%)3 0.33 (6.6%)3 0.31 (7.75%)2 0.66 2 PM Peak Hour 0.70 (8.75%)3 0.43 (8.6%)3 0.43 (10.75%)2 2.85 2 1 From Grand County Trip Generation Rates 2 From Maryvale Traffic Impact Analysis, by Leigh, Scott & Cleary 3 Peak Hour Percentages determined in Snowmass Village Roadway System study 4 From Pitkin County Retail Shop Trip Generation Rate - “No Transit System” scenario The estimated number of trips to be generated by the Rendezvous development was calculated based on the rates shown in Table 3; the results are depicted in Table 4. Rendezvous Traffic Impact Analysis Page 11 Table 4. Trip Generation Estimates Total Trips Generated AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourSectionSizeDailyEnterExitTotalEnterExitTotal East Mountain Residential 914 Units 342 SFDU, 442 MFDU, 130 Lodge) 4,970 110 310 420 320 170 490 Commercial 64.2 KSF 1,790 20 10 30 65 65 130 Sub-Total 6,760 130 320 450 385 235 620 West Mountain Residential 3,821 Units (686 SFDU, 1857 MFDU, 1278 Lodge) 17,785 375 1070 1,445 1,175 625 1,800 Commercial 395.8 KSF 9,740 115 65 180 380 380 760 Sub-Total 27,525 490 1,135 1,625 1,555 1,005 2,560 TOTALS 34,285 620 1,455 2,075 1,895 1,215 3,110 As shown in the table, the East Mountain portion of Rendezvous is expected to generate approximately 6,760 daily trips while the West Mountain would generate approximately 27,525 trips. A total of approximately 34,285 daily trips are expected to be generated by the development. Of these trips, approximately 2,100 are expected to occur during the AM peak hour, and about 3,100 are expected to occur during the PM peak hour. Based on the mix of land uses proposed for the development and the typical composition of trip types for uses of this sort, it was estimated that 33 percent of trips generated by the proposed commercial land uses would be attributable to residential uses internal to the site. It should be noted that these estimates do not reflect the factor of “passby” trips. Passby trips are vehicle-trips already traveling along the roadway network adjacent to a development usually a commercial development) that divert into the development to complete an errand, etc. Though passby trips contribute to traffic volumes entering and exiting a site, they do not add traffic to the adjacent roadway network. In the case of Rendezvous, information included in the ITE’s Trip Generation suggests that passby trips could comprise approximately 30 percent of the commercial site generated traffic volumes. Thus, the total trip generation for the Rendezvous development could be reduced by about 10 percent to account for the passby effect. However, in order to maintain a conservative approach to this analysis, no reduction was made to account for passby trips. Engineers who understand your business PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Fraser, Colorado 80442 Regulatory Date: October 29, 2019 Assessment Date: November 14, 2019 Report Date: November 21, 2019 Partner Project No. 19-246019.2 Prepared for BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE, LLC Portland, Oregon 97204 www.PARTNEResi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com November 21, 2019 Mr. Brad Biddle Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC 111 Southwest 5th Avenue, Suite 2650 Portland, Oregon 97204 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Fraser, Colorado 80442 Partner Project No. 19-246019.2 Dear Mr. Biddle, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) report of the abovementioned address (the “subject property”). This assessment was performed in conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. This assessment included a site reconnaissance on November 14, 2019 as well as research and interviews with representatives of the public, property ownership, site manager, and regulatory agencies. The regulatory assessment activities were initiated on October 29, 2019. An assessment was made, conclusions stated, and recommendations outlined. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in other matter, please contact me at (214) 234-9561. Sincerely, Scott Chiu National Client Manager Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at Old Victory Road in the City of Fraser, Grand County, Colorado (the “subject property”). The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC with an assessment concerning environmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they exist at the subject property. Property Description The subject property is located on the north side of Old Victory Road and the west side of Main Street within a mixed commercial and residential area of Fraser, Colorado. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject property: Subject Property Data Address: Old Victory Road, Fraser, Colorado Property Use: Vacant Land Acreage (Ac): 9.51 Ac Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN): 1587-194-00-155 Current Tenants: Vacant Land Site Assessment Performed By: Thomas Davis of Partner Site Assessment Conducted On: November 14, 2019 HUD PROGRAM: MAP 221(d)(4)* - New Construction* *HUD HEROS and supporting documentation are included under a separate cover and provided concurrent with the Phase I ESA outlined herein. The subject property is currently undeveloped, structurally-vacant land for proposed residential use. No onsite operations are currently conducted at the subject property. The subject property is proposed for future, multi-family development for a project that will reportedly consist of approximately 132 total multi-family units within seven, two- and three-story garden-style buildings. The subject property will also contain one leasing office/clubhouse building. The subject property is access via Old Victory Road within two areas along the southern boundary. The subject property is a portion of a larger tract of land, totaling 2,198.14 acres. The immediately surrounding properties consist of duplexes and single-family residences to the north across Willow Mountain Drive; a railroad line to the south across Old Victory Road; an open space beyond which is the Grand Park Community Recreation Center & Fraser Valley Metro Rec District; and a railroad line to the west across Old Victory Road. Information specific to the subject property regarding the depth to groundwater and direction of groundwater flow was not available for the subject area. However, according to the Colorado Water Science Center, the depth and direction of groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be approximately 2 to 12 feet below ground surface and flowing to the north (bgs). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page ii Findings Report Section ASTM Items No Further Action De Minimis BER* / Environmental Issue REC CREC HREC 3.0 Historical Background X 4.0 Federal, State, Local, Tribal Database Listings, Vapor Intrusion X 5.0 User Provided information X 6.0 Onsite Reconnaissance X 6.1 General Site Characteristics X 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards X 6.2.10 Non-ASTM X 6.3 Adjacent Properties X *BER - Business Environmental Risk A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. • Partner did not identify recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. • Partner did not identify controlled recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page iii • Partner did not identify historical recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. An environmental issue (also referred to as Business Environmental Risk) refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. • Partner did not identify environmental issues during the course of this assessment. Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 of Old Victory Road in the City of Fraser, Grand County, Colorado (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions or environmental issues in connection with the subject property. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends no further investigation of the subject property at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 User Reliance ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Limiting Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description ............................................................................................. 5 2.2 Current & Proposed Property Use ................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Description of Subject Property Structures and Improvements .................................................... 5 2.4 Current Use of Adjoining Properties.............................................................................................. 5 2.5 Physical Setting Sources .............................................................................................................. 6 2.5.1 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.5.2 Geology & Hydrology ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5.3 Surface Water Drainage ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5.4 Soils ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.5.5 Flood Zone Information ....................................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps ....................................................................................................... 9 3.3 City Directories .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps ......................................................................................................... 9 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Regulatory Agencies ................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.1 State Department ............................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.2 Health Department ............................................................................................................................................. 11 4.1.3 Fire Department .................................................................................................................................................. 11 4.1.4 Oil & Gas Exploration ....................................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.5 Assessor’s Office ................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.1.6 Super Priority Lien Statutes ........................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Regulatory Database Summary .................................................................................................. 13 4.2.1 Subject Property Listings ................................................................................................................................ 13 4.2.2 Adjacent Property Listings .............................................................................................................................. 13 4.2.3 Sites of Concern Listings ................................................................................................................................ 14 4.2.4 Orphan Listings ................................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.5 Vapor Intrusion .................................................................................................................................................... 14 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS .................................................................. 16 5.1 Interviews .................................................................................................................................... 17 5.1.1 Interview with Owner ......................................................................................................................................... 17 5.1.2 Interview with Report User ............................................................................................................................. 17 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager.................................................................................................................. 17 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants .................................................................. 17 5.1.5 Interview with Others ........................................................................................................................................ 17 5.2 User Provided Information .......................................................................................................... 17 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs ..................................................................................... 17 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page v 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge .................................................................................................................................... 17 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User ....................................................................................................................... 18 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ...................................................................................... 18 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ......................................................... 18 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation ...................................................................... 18 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ................................................................................................................. 19 6.1 General Site Characteristics ....................................................................................................... 19 6.1.1 Solid Waste Disposal ........................................................................................................................................ 19 6.1.2 Source of Heating and Cooling ..................................................................................................................... 19 6.1.3 Wells and Cisterns ............................................................................................................................................. 20 6.1.4 Surface Water Drainage .................................................................................................................................. 20 6.1.5 Sewage Discharge and Disposal ................................................................................................................. 20 6.1.6 Wastewater ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1.7 Lead in Drinking Water..................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1.8 Additional Site Observations ......................................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards ................................................................................................ 21 6.2.1 Hazardous Materials and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site ................................ 21 6.2.2 Aboveground & Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) ............................................................................................................................................................................. 21 6.2.3 Evidence of Releases ....................................................................................................................................... 22 6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) .............................................................................................................. 22 6.2.5 Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors ............................................................................................................. 22 6.2.6 Pools of Liquid ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 6.2.7 Drains, Sumps and Clarifiers ......................................................................................................................... 23 6.2.8 Stressed Vegetation .......................................................................................................................................... 23 6.2.9 Additional Potential Environmental Hazards ........................................................................................... 23 6.2.10 Mold (Non-ASTM Item) .................................................................................................................................... 24 6.3 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance ............................................................................................ 24 6.3.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) .............................................................................................................. 24 7.0 HUD HEROS / COMPLIANCE ITEMS ............................................................................................... 25 8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 26 9.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ............................................................ 27 10.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page vi Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Topographic Map Appendices Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Historical Documentation B1 Aerial Photographs B2 Fire Insurance Maps (No Coverage) B3 City Directories B4 Historical Topographic Maps B5 Client-Provided Documentation B6 Supporting Documentation (tax assessor, zoning, etc.) Appendix C Interviews/FOIAs Appendix D Qualifications Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at Old Victory Road in the City of Fraser, Grand County, Colorado (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this scope of work are described in the report. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this ESA is to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E-1527-13) affecting the subject property that: 1) constitute or result in a material violation or a potential material violation of any applicable environmental law; 2) impose any material constraints on the operation of the subject property or require a material change in the use thereof; 3) require clean-up, remedial action or other response with respect to Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products on or affecting the subject property under any applicable environmental law; 4) may affect the value of the subject property; and 5) may require specific actions to be performed with regard to such conditions and circumstances. In addition, a purpose of the Phase I ESA is to document compliance with 24 CFR 50.3(i), which states HUD’s policy that all properties proposed for use in HUD programs be free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances, where a hazard could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. The HUD HEROS and supporting documentation are included under a separate cover and provided concurrent with the Phase I ESA outlined herein. The information contained in the ESA Report will be used by Client to: 1) evaluate its legal and financial liabilities for transactions related to foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing; 2) evaluate the subject property’s overall development potential, the associated market value and the impact of applicable laws that restrict financial and other types of assistance for the future development of the subject property; and/or 3) determine whether specific actions are required to be performed prior to the foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing of the subject property. This ESA was performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”). ASTM Standards E-1527-13 and E- 1527-13 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B). In addition, a purpose of the Phase I ESA is to document compliance with 24 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 50.3(i)(1). An additional purpose is to determine the presence or absence of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals and gases, and radioactive substances, where a hazard could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the intended utilization of the property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 2 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for this ESA is in accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard Practice E1527- 13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312). This assessment included: 1) a property and adjacent site reconnaissance; 2) interviews with key personnel; 3) a review of historical sources; 4) a review of regulatory agency records; 5) a review of a regulatory database report provided by a third-party vendor and 6) Client provided documents, if available. 1.3 Limitations Partner warrants the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. Partner believes the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the subject property is reliable. However, Partner cannot and does not warrant or guarantee the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Some of the information provided in this report is based upon personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records, and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws other than the All Appropriate Inquiry provisions of the LLPs. Further, this report does not intend to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the subject property. Environmental concerns, which are beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA as defined by ASTM include the following: ACMs, LBP, radon, and lead in drinking water. These issues may affect environmental risk at the subject property and may warrant discussion and/or assessment; however, are considered non-scope issues. If specifically requested by the Client, these non-scope issues are discussed in Section 7.0. 1.4 User Reliance Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC, as well as the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, their employees, agents, successors, and assigns may rely upon this report in evaluating a request for an Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 3 extension of credit (the “Mortgage Loan”) to be secured by the subject property. This information also may be used by any actual or prospective purchaser, transferee, assignee, or servicer of the Mortgage Loan, any actual or prospective investor (including agent or advisor) in any securities evidencing a beneficial interest in or backed by the Mortgage Loan, any rating agency actually or prospectively rating any such securities, any indenture trustee, and any institutional provider(s) from time to time of any liquidity facility or credit support for such financing, provided that any such reliance by any of the foregoing is subject to the terms and conditions in place between Partner and its Client, which terms and conditions include (by way of illustration and not by way of limitation) a standard of care, a limitation of liability plus distribution and reliance restrictions and which terms and conditions, along with these limitations and reliance provisions shall be disclosed by Client to any and all of the foregoing who receive Partner’s report. In addition, the Client and all of the foregoing realize and acknowledge hereby that providing Partner’s report to any of the foregoing by the Client may create an actual or potential conflict of interest for Partner, and, as an essential pre-condition to such disclosure and receipt of this, or any Partner report, both the Client and all of the foregoing who may be in receipt of any Partner report agree to also waive any conflict of interest as to Partner or its employees, officers, directors or shareholders in connection with receipt of the Partner report by any of the foregoing. Reliance by any of the foregoing subject to the said terms and conditions and waiver of conflict of interest shall in no event increase Partner’s total maximum aggregate liability regardless of the number of claims or claimants. In addition, this report, or a reference to this report, may be included or quoted in any offering circular, private placement memorandum, registration statement, or prospectus, and Partner agrees to cooperate in answering questions by any of the above parties in connection with a securitization or transaction involving the Mortgage Loan and/or such securities, provided that any such inclusion expressly sets out these terms and conditions, use limitations and reliance restrictions and waiver of conflict of interest provisions. 1.5 Limiting Conditions The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM E-1527-13. Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below: • Partner requested information relative to deed restrictions and environmental liens, a title search, and completion of a pre-survey questionnaire from the Report User. This information was not provided at the time of the assessment. Based on information outlined herein, this data failure is not considered critical and does not change the conclusions of this report. • Partner requested User provided information such, but not limited to, activity and use limitations, “specialized knowledge or experience of the User”, “reason for significantly lower purchase price”, and “commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information”. This information was not provided at the time of the assessment. The lack of User provided information regarding valuation reduction for environmental issues of the subject property is considered a data gap; however, based on the review Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 4 of all standard historical sources and interviews with site knowledgeable personnel, this data failure is not considered critical and does not change the conclusions of this report. • Partner submitted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to Colorado State Fire Marshal and the Grand County Health Department for information pertaining to hazardous substances, underground storage tanks, releases, inspection records, etc. for the subject property. As of this writing, the Colorado State Fire Marshal and the Grand County Health Department has not responded to Partner’s request. Based on information obtained from other historical sources, this limitation is not expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment. If issues of an environmental concern are identified upon review of these documents, Partner will issue an addendum to this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 5 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description The subject property at Old Victory Road in Fraser, Colorado is located on the north side of Old Victory Road and the west side of Main Street. According to the Grand County Assessor, an abbreviated legal description for the subject property is described as “METES & BOUNDS 75 ALL 154.1 AC BEING IN PT S2SE4 SEC 20, PT SW4NW4 & NW4SW4 SEC 28 & PT N2NE4 & PT SE4NE4 SEC 29 LYING NORTH OF RAILROAD ALL IN T1S R75W LESS TRACT LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF US HWY 40 ROW & LESS PT NW4NE4 SEC 29 BEING PT COZENS MEADOW AT GRAND PARK”, and ownership is currently vested in Grand Park Development LLC since 1999. Please refer to Figure 1: Site Location Map, Figure 2: Site Plan, Figure 3: Topographic Map, and Appendix A: Site Photographs for the location and site characteristics of the subject property. 2.2 Current & Proposed Property Use The subject property is currently undeveloped (Grassland and woodland). The subject property is currently occupied by Grand Park Development LLC for future development. No buildings are currently located on the subject property. The subject property is designated for planned development district by the City of Fraser. The subject property was not identified in the regulatory database report outlined herein. 2.3 Description of Subject Property Structures and Improvements Subject Property Data Property Use: Vacant Land Acreage (Ac): 9.51 Ac The subject property consists of rocky, undeveloped grassland. 2.4 Current Use of Adjoining Properties The subject property is located within a mixed commercial and residential area of Fraser, Colorado. During the vicinity reconnaissance, Partner observed the following land use on properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: Immediately Surrounding Properties North: Willow Mountain Drive beyond which is duplexes and single-family residences South: Old Victory Road beyond which is a railroad line East: An open space beyond which is the Grand Park Community Recreation Center & Fraser Valley Metro Rec District West: Old Victory Road beyond which is a railroad line No adjacent properties were identified in the regulatory database report outlined herein. Please refer to Figure 2: Site Plan. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 6 2.5 Physical Setting Sources 2.5.1 Topography Topography Information Site Elevation: 8,700 feet above mean sea level (MSL) Slope Characteristic: Gently Surface Runoff/Topographic Gradient: North Information Source: USGS Fraser, Colorado Quadrangle 7.5-minute series topographic map The subject property is depicted on the 2019 map as undeveloped. According to the topographic map, no anomalies were noted on or in the vicinity of the subject property. Please refer to Figure 3: Topographic Map. 2.5.2 Geology & Hydrology Hydrology Information Formation: The subject property is situated within the Southern Rocky Mountains physiographic province of the State of Colorado Description: The uppermost geologic formation underlying the soils at the subject property is the late Pleistocene aged gravelly stream-terrace alluvium deposits. Closest Surface Water: Fraser River Estimated Depth to First Occurrence of Groundwater: 2 to 12 feet Hydrogeologic Gradient: North Information Source: https://maps.waterdata.usgs.gov/mapper/index.html * The groundwater flow direction and the depth to shallow, unconfined groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon seasonal variations in rainfall and other hydrogeological features. Without the benefit of onsite groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath the subject property cannot be directly ascertained. According to available information, a public water system operated by the town of Fraser serves the subject property vicinity. According to the water quality report, shallow groundwater directly beneath the subject property is not utilized for domestic purposes. The sources of public water for the City of Fraser are groundwater wells not located on the subject property. Information specific to the subject property regarding the depth to groundwater and direction of groundwater flow was not available for the subject area. However, according to the Colorado Water Science Center, the depth and direction of groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be approximately 2 to 12 feet below ground surface and flowing to the north (bgs). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 7 2.5.3 Surface Water Drainage Surface Water Drainage Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Stormwater No No Stormwater Management Pond(s) No No Surface water bodies No No Other (Pits, ponds and lagoons) No No Storm water is removed from the subject property primarily by infiltration through the overburden soils at the subject property. The subject property is not currently connected to a municipal owned and maintained sewer system. 2.5.4 Soils Soil Characteristics Soil Type: Tine Gravelly Sandy Loam Description: The Tine series consists of deep, well drained, high infiltration rate soils that formed in noncalcareous transported material over beds of sand, gravel, and cobble. These soils are on fans, terraces, outwash plains, glacial moraines, and eskers. Slopes ranged from 0 to 30 percent. Source Information: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey online database No soil stability, erosion and drainage concerns were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 2.5.5 Flood Zone Information Flood Zone/Descriptions Zone X (Unshaded) An area located outside of the 100-year and 500-year flood plains. Zone X (shaded) or Zone X500 Areas between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year flood; or certain areas subject to 100-year flood with average depths less than one foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile; or areas protected by levees from the 100-year flood. Source Information: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Community Panel Number 08089C0991C, dated January 2, 2008 Additional information and HUD requirements for HUD flood zone compliance are outlined within the HUD Part 50 Form and Partner Flood Management Worksheet, which are provided under a separate cover concurrent with this Phase I ESA. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 8 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Partner obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources, which are outlined within the Reference Section of this report. A chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below: Historical Use Information Period/Date Source Description/Use 1924-Present Aerial Photographs, Interviews, Topographic Maps Undeveloped/Native land According to available historical sources, the subject property was formerly undeveloped as early as 1924. No potential or additional environmental concerns were identified in association with the current or historic use of the subject property. 3.1 Aer ial Photograph Review Partner obtained available aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area from Environmental Data Resources (EDR). The following observations were noted to be visible on the subject property and adjacent properties during the aerial photograph review: Date: 1953 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Undeveloped (grassland and woodland) North: Undeveloped South: Developed with a railroad line East: Undeveloped West: Developed with a railroad line Date: 1976, 1979, 1984, 1988, 1999, 2005 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: No significant changes visible South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible West: No significant changes visible Date: 2009 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: Developed with a road South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible West: No significant changes visible Date: 2013 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Bisected by a road North: No significant changes visible South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 9 West: No significant changes visible Date: 2017 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: Developed with single-family residential properties South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible West: No significant changes visible Copies of select aerial photographs are included in Appendix B of this report. 3.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Partner reviewed the collection of Sanborn Fire insurance maps from EDR. Sanborn map coverage was not available for the subject property. A copy of reviewed Sanborn Maps No Coverage Letter is included in Appendix B of this report. 3.3 City Directories Partner reviewed historical city directories obtained from Environmental Data Resources (EDR) for past names and businesses that were listed for the subject property and adjacent properties. City directories were not identified for the subject property and vicinity. Copies of reviewed city directories are included in Appendix B of this report. 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps Partner reviewed historical topographic maps obtained from Environmental Data Resources (EDR). The following observations were noted to be depicted on the subject property and adjacent properties during the topographic map review: Date: 1924 Subject Property: Undeveloped (grassland and woodland). Leland Creek is shown on the eastern portion of the property North: Undeveloped South: Developed with a railroad line East: Undeveloped West: Developed with a railroad line Date: 1926, 1943, 1957, 1973 Subject Property: No significant changes depicted North: No significant changes depicted South: No significant changes depicted East: No significant changes depicted West: No significant changes depicted Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 10 Date: 2013 Subject Property: No significant changes depicted North: Developed with a road South: No significant changes depicted East: No significant changes depicted West: No significant changes depicted Copies of reviewed topographic maps are included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 11 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Regulatory Agencies 4.1.1 State Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Point of Contact: Frank Dale Agency Address: 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado Agency Phone Number: (303) 692-3565 Date of Contact: November 5, 2019 Method of Communication: Email Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage or releases, or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the CDPHE. 4.1.2 Health Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Grand County Public Health (GCPH) Point of Contact: Email Agency Address: 308 Byers Avenue, Hot Sulphur Springs, Colorado Agency Phone Number: (970) 725-3792 Date of Contact: October 30, 2019 Method of Communication: Email Summary of Communication: As of the date of this report, Partner has not received a response from the GCPH for inclusion in this report. 4.1.3 Fire Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Fraser Town Clerk Point of Contact: Antoinette McVeigh Agency Address: 153 Fraser Avenue, Fraser, Colorado Agency Phone Number: (970) 726-5491, ext. 201 Date of Contact: October 30, 2019 Method of Communication: Email Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 12 Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage or releases, or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the Fraser Town Clerk. 4.1.4 Oil & Gas Exploration Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) Point of Contact: Online Agency Address: 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 801, Denver, Colorado Agency Phone Number: (303) 894-2100 Date of Contact: November 12, 2019 Method of Communication: Online Search Summary of Communication: According to COGCC, no oil or gas wells are located on or adjacent to the subject property. 4.1.5 Assessor’s Office Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Grand County Assessor (GCA) Point of Contact: Online Agency Address: 308 Byers Avenue, Hot Sulphur Springs, Colorado Agency Phone Number: (970) 725-3060 Date of Contact: November 12, 2019 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is identified by Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 1587-194-00-155 and is currently owned by Grand Park Development LLC since 1999. Copies of pertinent documents are included in Appendix B of this report. 4.1.6 Super Priority Lien Statutes According to the Environmental Lien and AUL State Statutes via the internet, http://environmental.netronline.com/lienStatutes.aspx, the State of Colorado does not currently maintain an environmental super lien law. The State of Colorado adopted the Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act – CRS 38-25-101 et seq. Environmental Liens are filed in the Office of the Clerk/Recorder where the real estate is located. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 13 4.2 Regulatory Database Summary Information from standard federal, state, county, and city environmental record sources was provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), dated October 29, 2019. Data from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as these data are released. The information contained in this report was compiled from publicly available sources and the locations of the subject property are plotted utilizing a geographic information system, which geocodes the subject property addresses. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. Radius Report Data Database Search Radius (mile) Site Adjacent Properties Sites of Concern Federal NPL or Delisted NPL Site 1.00 N N N Federal CERCLIS Site 0.50 N N N Federal CERCLIS-NFRAP Site 0.50 N N N Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facility 1.00 N N N Federal RCRA TSDF Facility 0.50 N N N Federal RCRA Generators Site (LQG, SQG, CESQG) 0.25 N N N Federal IC/EC Registries 0.50 N N N Federal ERNS Site Subject Property N NA NA State/Tribal Equivalent NPL 1.00 N N N State/Tribal Equivalent CERCLIS 1.00 N N N State/Tribal Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Site 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Site 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Registered Storage Tank Sites (UST/AST) 0.25 N N N State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites (VCP) 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Spills 0.50 N N N Federal Brownfield Sites 0.50 N N N State Brownfield Sites 0.50 N N N EDR MGP Varies N N N EDR US Hist Auto Station Varies N N N EDR US Hist Cleaners Varies N N N Other Varies N N N 4.2.1 Subject Property Listings The subject property is not identified in the regulatory database report. Based on the findings, vapor migration is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.2 Adjacent Property Listings The adjacent properties are not identified in the regulatory database report Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 14 Based on the findings, vapor migration is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.3 Sites of Concern Listings No sites of concern are identified in the regulatory database report. 4.2.4 Orphan Listings No orphan listings are identified in the regulatory database report. Based on the findings, vapor migration is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.5 Vapor Intrusion Partner has performed a Vapor Intrusion Assessment (Tier 1 Screen) in accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E 2600-15 for the subject property. The purpose of this Vapor Intrusion Assessment (Tier 1 Screen) was to identify existing or potential Vapor Intrusion Conditions (pVIC) (as defined by ASTM Standard E 2600-15) affecting the subject property. The initial Tier 1 Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) has been completed in accordance with the above stated requirements. The data and research completed as part of this Phase I ESA Report was also utilized in the review of the potential for a Vapor Encroachment Condition (VEC) and included the following sources: • USGS Topographic Map • Historical Aerial Photographs • EDR Regulatory Database • Subject property and Vicinity Photographs • Interviews Vapor intrusion additional criteria Question Response Comments 1. Is the property known to have current or past contamination? No None reported 2. Is contamination of the property suspected? No None reported 3. Is an adjacent property known to have current or past contamination which may have impacted the subject property? No None reported 4. Is a nearby property known to have current or past contamination which may have impacted the subject property? No None reported 5. Is regional groundwater contamination known to exist beneath the property? No None reported 6. Are you aware of other conditions which may result in vapor intrusion at the property? No None reported Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 15 A Vapor Encroachment worksheet and Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) was completed by Partner and provided by EDR. The VES was performed using Tier 1 non-invasive screening pursuant to ASTM E 2600- 15 “Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, Section 8”. Based on the findings of the Tier I screen and VES, vapor intrusion can be ruled out because a VEC does not or is not likely to exist. As such, no further assessment is recommended. Of note, a copy of the EDR regulatory database report and completed VES are included with the HUD HEROS, which is included under a separate folder that is provided concurrent with this Phase I ESA. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 16 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the Brownfields Amendments), the User must provide the following information (if available) to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiry is not complete. The user is asked to provide information or knowledge of the following: • Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site. • Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in a registry. • Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLPs. • Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated. • Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property. • The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. • The reason for preparation of this Phase I ESA. Fulfillment of these user responsibilities is key to qualification for the identified defenses to CERCLA liability. Partner requested our Client to provide information to satisfy User Responsibilities as identified in Section 6 of the ASTM guidance. Pursuant to ASTM E 1527-13, Partner requested the following site information from Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC (User of this report). Copies of pertinent documents are included in Appendix B of this report. User Responsibilities Item Provided By User Not Provided By User Discussed Below Does Not Apply Environmental Pre-Survey Questionnaire X X Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs X Specialized Knowledge X Actual Knowledge X Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues X Identification of Key Site Manager Section 5.1.3 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA Section 1.1 Prior Environmental Reports Section 5.2.6 X Other X Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 17 5.1 Interviews 5.1.1 Interview with Owner According to Mr. Clark Lipscomb, subject property owner representative, the subject property has not been developed. Mr. Lipscomb further stated there are no USTs, ASTs, clarifiers, oil/water separators, groundwater monitoring wells, or hazardous substance use/storage/generation on the subject property to the best of his knowledge. 5.1.2 Interview with Report User Please refer to Section 5.2 below for information requested from the Report User. The information requested was not received prior to the issuance of this report. Because the Report User (Client) is a lender, it is understood the Report User would not have knowledge of the property that would significantly impact our ability to satisfy the objectives of this assessment. The lack of this information is not considered to represent a significant data gap. 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager Mr. Lipscomb also serves as a key site manager for the subject property. Mr. Lipscomb completed the environmental site questionnaires provided by Partner for the subject property. According to Mr. Lipscomb and as noted in the completed questionnaires, no proposed and/or existing stationary tanks containing explosive or fire-prone materials of 100-gallons or larger are located and/or planned for the subject property. Furthermore, no environmental concerns/issues were noted in the completed questionnaires. A copy of the completed questionnaires is included within the appendices. 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants Interviews with past owners, operators and occupants were not conducted since information regarding the potential for contamination at the subject property was obtained from other sources. 5.1.5 Interview with Others As the subject property is not an abandoned property as defined in ASTM 1527-13, interview with others were not performed. 5.2 User Provided Information 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs Partner was not provided with title records or environmental lien and AUL information for review as part of this assessment. 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge No specialized knowledge of environmental conditions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 18 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User The User was not aware of environmental liens and/or AULs encumbering the subject property or in connection with the subject property at the time of the assessment. 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues The User was not aware of reductions in property value due to environmental issues. 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The User did not provide information that is commonly known or reasonably ascertainable within the local community about the subject property at the time of the assessment. 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation The following information was provided to Partner for review during the course of this assessment: Phase I ESA Grand Park, Corn and Associates (February 8, 2012) Corn and Associates (C&A) prepared this report on behalf of US Bank. The assessment was performed in accordance with ASTM Standard E1527-05. The assessment consisted of a site reconnaissance, interviews with knowledgeable personnel, review of historical information, a review of federal, state and local regulatory databases. The assessment was performed on a larger parcel of land that included the subject property. Pertinent information contained in this report is summarized below: • At the time of the 2012 assessment, the subject property was undeveloped. • 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon buckets of new and used oil were observed at the Grand Park maintenance area to the north of the subject property. • No current or former ASTs or USTs were identified on the subject property or C&A’s site. C&A identified no RECs and recommended no further investigation on the subject property referenced in this report. Copies of pertinent pages reviewed are included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 19 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The weather at the time of the site visit was sunny and clear. Refer to Section 1.5 for limitations encountered during the field reconnaissance and Sections 2.1 and 2.2 for subject property operations. The table below provides the site assessment details: Site Assessment Data Site Assessment Performed By: Thomas Davis Site Assessment Conducted On: November 14, 2019 The table below provides the subject property personnel interviewed during the field reconnaissance: Site Visit Personnel for Old Victory Road (Subject Property) Name Title/Role Contact Number Site Walk* Yes/No Clark Lipscomb President / Grand Park Development LLC (970) 948-1883 Yes * Accompanied Partner during the field reconnaissance activities and provided information pertaining to the current operations and maintenance of the subject property The subject property is currently occupied by Grand Park Development LLC for mixed-use development. No potential environmental concerns were identified during the onsite reconnaissance. 6.1 General Site Characteristics 6.1.1 Solid Waste Disposal Solid Waste Disposal Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Trash, debris, and/or other waste materials No No Dumping or disposal areas No No Construction/demolition debris and/or dumped fill dirt No No Landfilling activities No No Other No No Solid waste is not currently generated at the subject property. 6.1.2 Source of Heating and Cooling Source of Heating and Cooling Item or Feature Service Provider Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Heating and/or cooling systems No No Other (Hot Water) No No Because no structures were located on the subject property, sources of heating and cooling were not observed during the site reconnaissance. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 20 6.1.3 Wells and Cisterns Wells and Cisterns Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Potable wells No No Monitoring wells No No Irrigation wells No No Other (Dry Wells) No No No aboveground evidence of wells or cisterns was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.1.4 Surface Water Drainage Surface Water Drainage Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Stormwater Yes No Surface water bodies No No Wetlands Yes No Other No No Storm water is removed from the subject property primarily by sheet flow action downgradient towards an irrigation ditch or into the adjacent public right of way. The subject property is not connected to a municipal owned and maintained sewer system. The subject property appears to be a designated wetland, based on information obtained from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service. According to a site plan provided for the proposed apartments at the subject property, a wetland is located on the eastern property boundary. 6.1.5 Sewage Discharge and Disposal Sewage Discharge and Disposal Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Septic system and/or leachfield No No Cesspools No No Wastewater treatment system No No Exterior pipe discharges and/or other effluent discharges No No Other No No The City of Fraser services the subject property vicinity. No wastewater treatment facilities or septic systems are observed or reported on the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 21 6.1.6 Wastewater Wastewater Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Wastewater treatment systems and/or water treatment systems No No Oil/water separators No No Other No No No domestic wastewater is generated at the subject property. No industrial process is currently performed at the subject property. Of note, a municipal sanitary sewer system services the subject property area. 6.1.7 Lead in Drinking Water According to available information, a public water system operated by the town of Fraser serves the subject property vicinity. The sources of public water for the City of Fraser are groundwater from wells. According to the City of Fraser and the 2019 Annual Water Quality Report, water supplied to the subject property is in compliance with all State and Federal regulations pertaining to drinking water standards, including lead and copper. Water sampling was not conducted to verify water quality. 6.1.8 Additional Site Observations No additional general site characteristics were observed. 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards 6.2.1 Hazardous Materials and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products Noted Onsite Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Drums, Barrels, and/or Containers >5 gallons No No Parts Washer No No MSDS No No Other (General Maintenance Supplies) No No No hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. No hazardous materials or petroleum products were observed on the subject property. 6.2.2 Aboveground & Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) AST and UST Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) ASTs No No USTs No No Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 22 AST and UST Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Other No No No evidence of current or former ASTs or USTs was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.3 Evidence of Releases Evidence of Releases Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Stained Soil No No Stained Pavement or Similar Surface No No Surface Water Discoloration, Odor, Sheen, and/or Free-Floating Product No No Other No No No spills, stains or other indications that a surficial release has occurred at the subject property were observed. 6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) PCBs Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Pole or Pad-Mounted Transformers and/or Capacitors No No Hydraulic Lifts No No Elevators No No Compactors/Balers No No Other No No No potential PCB-containing equipment (transformers (labeled as non-PCB containing), oil-filled switches, hoists, lifts, dock levelers, hydraulic elevators, etc) was observed on the subject property during Partner’s reconnaissance. 6.2.5 Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Odors No No Other No No No strong, pungent or noxious odors were evident during the site reconnaissance. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 23 6.2.6 Pools of Liquid Pools of Liquid Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Pools of Liquids No No Other No No No pools of liquid were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.7 Drains, Sumps and Clarifiers Drains, Sumps, and Clarifiers Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Interior Floor Drains No No Sumps, Cisterns, Catch Basins, and/or Dry Wells No No Grease Traps No No Oil/Water Separator No No Other No No No drains, sumps, or clarifiers, other than those associated with storm water removal, were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.8 Stressed Vegetation Stressed Vegetation Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Stressed Vegetation No No Other No No No stressed vegetation was observed on the subject property. 6.2.9 Additional Potential Environmental Hazards Additional Potential Environmental Hazards Item or Feature Observed (Yes/No) REC (Yes/No) Dry Cleaning No No Photo Processing No No Laboratory Hoods and/or Incinerators No No Radiological Hazards (does not include radon) No No Other No No No additional environmental hazards, including landfill activities or radiological hazards, were observed. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 24 6.2.10 Mold (Non-ASTM Item) Molds are microscopic organisms found virtually everywhere, indoors and outdoors. Mold will grow and multiply under the right conditions, needing only sufficient moisture (e.g.in the form of very high humidity, condensation, or water from a leaking pipe, etc.) and organic material (e.g., ceiling tile, drywall, paper, or natural fiber carpet padding). No structures are currently present at the subject property. 6.3 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance The adjacent property reconnaissance consisted of observing the adjacent properties from the subject property premises. No items of environmental concern were identified on the adjacent properties during the site inspection, including hazardous materials, petroleum products, ASTs, USTs, evidence of releases, PCBs, strong or noxious odors, pools of liquids, sumps or clarifiers, pits or lagoons, stressed vegetation, or other potential environmental hazards. 6.3.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Multiple pad-mounted transformers were observed on the adjacent properties. No staining or leakage was observed in the vicinity of the transformers. Based on these observations, the presence of adjacent transformers is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 25 7.0 HUD HEROS / COMPLIANCE ITEMS HUD has established the HUD Environmental Review Online System (HEROS) – Form HUD 4128 to document the environmental review process, “Environmental Assessment and Compliance Finding for Related Laws”, with NEPA and other environmental Federal laws, authorities, Executive Orders, and HUD standards, outlined within the Multifamily Accelerated Processing (MAP) Guide dated January 29, 2016 (Effective Date May 28, 2016). This section is outlined within the HUD HEROS along with supporting documentation. The HUD criteria noted below is provided under a separate cover that is included concurrent with this Phase I ESA. • Air Quality • Airport Hazards • Coastal Barrier/Management Zone • Endangered or Threatened Species or Habitats • Environmental Assessment Factors and Analysis • Environmental Justice • Environmental Review Housing Requirements (Lead-Based Paint, Radon, Asbestos, Additional Nuisances and Hazards) • Environmental Review Project Information • Farmland Protection • Flood Insurance • Flood Management • Hazardous Industrial Operations • Noise Compliance • Sole Source Aquifer • State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) • Toxic Chemical and Radioactive Materials, Including VES • Wetland • Wild and Scenic Rivers Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 26 8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Findings A REC refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. • Partner did not identify recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A CREC refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. • Partner did not identify controlled recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A HREC refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. • Partner did not identify historical recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. An environmental issue (also referred to as Business Environmental Risk) refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. • Partner did not identify environmental issues during the course of this assessment. Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 of Old Victory Road in the City of Fraser, Grand County, Colorado (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions or environmental issues in connection with the subject property. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends no further investigation of the subject property at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 27 9.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property located at Old Victory Road in the City of Fraser, Grand County, Colorado in conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report. By signing below, Partner declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, the undersigned meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. Partner has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. I understand that my Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) will be used by Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC to document to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development that the MAP Lender’s application for FHA multifamily mortgage insurance was prepared and reviewed in accordance with HUD requirements. I certify that my review was in accordance with the HUD requirements applicable on the date of my review and that I have no financial interest or family relationship with the officers, directors, stockholders, members or partners of the lender or affiliated entities, Borrower or affiliated entities, the general contractor, any subcontractors, the buyer or seller of the proposed property or engage in any business that might present a conflict of interest. I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that all of the information I have provided on this form and in any accompanying documentation is true and accurate. I acknowledge that if I knowingly have made any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement, representation, or certification on this form or on any accompanying documents, I may be subject to criminal, civil, and/or administrative sanctions, including fines, penalties, and/or imprisonment under applicable federal law, including but not limited to 12 U.S.C. § 1833a; 18 U.S.C. §§1001, 1006, 1010, 1012, and 1014; 12 U.S.C. §1708 and 1735f-14; and 31 U.S.C. §§3729 and 3802. Prepared By Thomas Davis Adam Wywrocki Environmental Scientist Environmental Professional Reviewed By Michael Lawlor, Jr. Senior Author, Environmental Professional Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 19-246019.2 November 21, 2019 Page 28 10.0 REFERENCES Reference Documents American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation: E1527-13. Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Radius Report, November 2019 Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Vapor Encroachment worksheet and Vapor Encroachment Screen (VEC) Report, November 2019 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed via internet, November 2019 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed via internet, November 2019 United States Geological Survey, Soil Survey, accessed via the Internet, November 2019 United States Geological Survey Topographic Map, 7.5-minute series, accessed via internet, November 2019 FIGURES Site Location Map Topographic Map Site Plan FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP Project No. 19-246019.2 Drawing Not To Scale KEY: Subject Property FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN Project No. 19-246019.2 KEY: Subject Property GROUNDWATER FLOW FIGURE 3: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Project No. 19-246019.2 USGS 7.5 Minute Fraser, Colorado Quadrangle Created: 2019 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 19-246019.2 1. Old Victory Road on the eastern side of the subject property, facing east 2. Old Victory Road on the eastern side of the subject property, facing south 3. Old Victory Road on the eastern side of the subject property, facing west 4. Old Victory Road on the eastern side of the subject property, facing north 5. Intersection of Old Victory Road and American Willow Drive 6. Natural gas pipeline marker on the south side of Old Victory Road APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 19-246019.2 7. Irrigation ditch adjacent to the subject property 8. Irrigation ditch adjacent to the subject property 9. Adjacent duplex buildings to the north of the subject property 10. Adjacent duplex buildings to the north of the subject property 11. Adjacent duplex buildings to the north of the subject property 12. Adjacent duplex buildings to the north of the subject property APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 19-246019.2 13. Trash enclosure to the west of the subject property 14. Residential properties to the west of the subject property 15. Adjacent railroad right of way to south of Old Victory Road 16. Adjacent railroad right of way to south of Old Victory Road 17. Adjacent railroad right of way to south of Old Victory Road 18. Adjacent property to the east of the subject property along Old Victory Road APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 19-246019.2 19. Fire hydrant located adjacent to the subject property 20. Construction material storage on the subject property 21. Subject property facing south 22. Subject property facing west 23. Subject property facing north 24. Subject property facing east APPENDIX B: HISTORICAL DOCUMENTATION page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1953 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 3 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1976 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 4 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1979 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 5 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1984 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 6 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1988 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 7 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1999 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 8 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2005 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 9 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2009 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 10 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2013 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 11 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2017 500 1000 2000 5848061 8 12 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 10/29/19 Old Victory Road Willows Apartments at Grand Park Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200 FRASER, CO 80442 5848061.3 Torrance, CA 90501-0000 Brandon Varvell The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 06B7-4FDA-8681 Willows Apartments at Grand Pa UNMAPPED PROPERTY 19-246019.2 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 06B7-4FDA-8681 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5848061 3 2 Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road FRASER, CO 80442 Inquiry Number: 5848061.5 October 31, 2019 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2014 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 2010 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 2005 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 2000 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 1995 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 1992 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 1987 ¨þ EDR Digital Archive 5848061-5 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET Old Victory Road FRASER, CO 80442 Year CD Image Source OLD VICTORY RD 2014 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 2010 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 2005 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 2000 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 1995 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 1992 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 1987 -EDR Digital Archive Street not listed in Source 5848061-5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source U S HWY 40 2005 pg. A5 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg. A8 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg. A13 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg. A20 EDR Digital Archive 1987 pg. A27 EDR Digital Archive US HIGHWAY 40 2014 pg. A1 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg. A3 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg. A14 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg. A21 EDR Digital Archive US HWY 40 2014 pg. A2 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg. A4 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg. A6 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg. A12 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg. A19 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg. A26 EDR Digital Archive 5848061-5 Page 3 City Directory Images - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 73146 DROLL, GARY F 73244 RECTOR, ROBERT 73292 CARRAWAY, NEIL 77699 CENTENNIAL BANK - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 76827 ROCKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE 77601 EAST GRAND COUNTY FIRE PROTECT 77699 MENEES, JAMES S 77795 KOELBEL HOLDINGS INC RENDEZVOUS COLORADO LLC - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 73146 DROLL, GARY F 73244 RECTOR, ROBERT 73292 CARRAWAY, NEIL - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 76827 ROCKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE 77601 EAST GRND CNTY FIRE PRTCTN DIS 77699 MENEES, JAMES S 77795 KOELBEL HOLDINGS INC RENDEZVOUS COLORADO LLC - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 76718 INTEGRATED SERVICES - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 73244 RECTOR, ROBERT 73292 CARRAWAY, NEIL 76827 ROCKY MOUNTAIN MOONSHINE 77601 EAST GRAND CNTY FIRE PROTECTIO 77720 MOUNTAIN MADNESS EXCAVATION 77795 KOELBEL & COMPANY INC RENDEZVOUS COLORADO LLC 78199 HERNANDOS PIZZA PUB LTD 78253 WALDRON, SARAH 78259 LORD GORE ARMS INC MAJESTIC MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES 78260 GRAND COUNTY FINANCIAL SVCS RYE, KRISTEN WINTER PARK BREWING CO INC 78415 BUCKETS METATRON 78491 HANDS, AMY MAHAGWA, LILLIAN E MAYEUX, COREY 78515 BANK OF WINTER PARK WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC 78594 ARAPAHOE LODGE INC 78622 BROWN & CO REAL ESTATE SVCS 78669 TATELEMAN, KAREN 78679 BROZ, JOSEPH ROTHMAN, ANDY 78683 PARKER, SCOTT H WHITE, CLAIBORNE D 78737 BREZACEK, LAD CANNON, TED C DIXON, ROBERT E EVANS-HOWE, CARLA GIEFER, H G JURGENSEN, LADONNA KENNEDY, JOHN J NEUDECK, ALEX PARKER, RUSELL RHOADS, DON RUSSINI, BILL SANNAN, BILL 78841 WINTER PARKFRASER VALLEY 78869 SUNDOWNER MOTEL 78876 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 78878 BYERS PEAK EXPRESS VIDEO OF GRAND COUNTY K C HAIR DESIGN 78884 ALLEGIANT MANAGEMENT LLC WIRSING & CO INC 78885 ACTIVE IMAGES 78902 COLDWELL BANKER MOUNTAIN PRPTS (Cont'd) - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 78902 SNOW MOUNTAIN SPORTS WALDRON MARIAN REAL ESTATE 78930 DAILEY INSURANCE AGENCY INC DIVIDE GRILL JONES, LARRY B JUST TEEZIN PAN HANDLER INC 78941 CHRISTY SPORTS LLC PEPE OSAKAS WINTER PARK OPTICAL INC 78960 LA PORTE & ASSOCIATES PC 78966 VIKING LODGE & SKI SHOP INC 78967 GRAND COUNTY BLUES SOCIETY 79025 VALLEY HI MOTEL INC 79050 ALDRICH, THAYER ANDRUS, BILL BAUMGARTEN, ROBERT CARNES, B CASCADES OF ROCKIES LTD CLINE, KELSEY FOGLER, SCOTT FREEMAN, WYNNE HAINES, JOHN HANSEN, THAYNE KANE, STEPHEN KRISHNAMURTI, GIDDU KRIZAN, ZDENKO LANG, JOHN E MAPES, JOHN MARTIN, KATHY SABLOSKY, DANIEL VALERA, MARARIO WINTER PARK ICEHOUSE LLC 79075 FLECK, KENNETH J JAROSZ, E LAURSEN, CARLTON MYGATT, CHRIS SHINTAKU, S M SNOWBLAZE ATHLETIC CLUB - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 69069 PAYNE, DIANA SANDERSON, DUANE 72160 JOHNSTON, ERIC 75487 FRASER SANITATION TRTMNT PLANT 76718 SUMRALL, STEVE 77601 EAST GRAND COUNTY FIRE PROTCTN ERICKSON, J GOCKLEY, G RUMMEL, MARK VISCONTI, ALLEN VOLLRATH, JASON 77720 MOUNTAIN MADNESS EXCAVATION SNOSCOOTS/MOUNTAIN MADNESS 77849 SUCHT, STEVE 78253 SITZMARK 78260 MARK, MICHAEL SCHATTELES, HERB 78336 BOLEN, BOB CHRISTENSEN, WENDY CONTINENTAL PROP MANAGEMENT RE ENGEL, GEORGE G LAST WALTZ INC (THE) STADELMAN, AL WINTER PK FRAM SHP GLLRY INC WINTERPARK SPORT SHOP 78415 CONDOMINIUM MANAGEMENT CO EVERGREEN OIL COMPANY 78491 KENNEY, D PETERS, ERIC VONHOLT, JEFF YOUNG, THOMAS S 78542 SCHIESL, R 78572 GASIENICA, ALBERT 78594 ARAPAHOE LODGE INC HOLZWARTH, BRAD JESSE, LOUIS R 78669 TATELEMAN, KAREN 78679 GORDON, STEPHEN MALONE, C MIKOL, MATTHEW P PHILLIPPI, J 78683 GALLANT, BOB PARKER, W K WHITE, C 78727 TIN PNS-CGARS CGNACS GOLF GFTS 78737 BLACK, DONALD BREZACEK, LAD BURNS, BETH BYNUM, GROVER CANNON, TED C (Cont'd) - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 78737 DIXON, ROBERT E FREDERICK, J W FREY, SAM HALLORAN, R A HEITMAN, STAN HOWE, TERRY HYDRUSKO, M L JAMES, G G KENNEDY, JOHN J KIRSCH, RAY RHOADS, KAY SANDY, JERRY SANNAN, BILL WEDER, RENE 78746 GASTHAUS EICHLER 78878 7-ELEVEN INC ELK HORN REALTY INC 78884 SNOWRIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSN WIRSING & CO INC 78885 SUBWAY SANDWICHES & SALADS 78902 FLANAGANS SKI RENTALS INC 78911 DAFFER, DAN O KUTRUMBOS, A SWISS HOUSE INC 78927 OVER YOUR HEAD SHIRT FCTRY 78930 CHRISTY SPORTS LLC KERSHNER JOANNE POLLY, NATHAN ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FCTRY 78967 OIUM, ANNIE 78977 LEE, ADRIAN 79005 CARLSON, GEORGE 79025 VALLEY HI MOTEL INC 79050 ALPINE SUN SKI & SPORT LTD CAMOZZI, DOUGLAS FOGLER, SCOTT HANSEN, THAYNE LAWSON, JOHN MAPES, JOHN MILLER, T OLOUGHLIN, WILLIAM OTTAWAY, MARY PHILLIPS, EDDIE SABLOSKY, DANIEL SENOVICH, TERRY A WIRSING, ROBIN 79075 EVANS, THOMAS FITTZ, DAVID HANSON, JOHN SHERWOOD, SCOTT (Cont'd) - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 79075 SNOWBLAZE ATHLETIC CLUB STROBEL, DAVID WEISBACH, PHILIP T WILKINSON, DAVID H 79104 BOWLES, M BRAHINSKY, BEN JOLLIFFE, RICHARD A LARSEN, R J MEANS, FRANK L SAUNDERS, ROBERT TASSET REALTY OF WINTER PARK WALKER, DON WESTERBUHR, LLOYD WOLF, E L 79303 ADKINS, EUGENE BEAVER MANAGEMENT GROUP INC BOYD, ROBERT BRONSEMA, KLAAS BUSH, CHARLES CAMPBELL, PETER CARTWRIGHT, JUNE COFFMAN, RICHARD CORRELL, MARK R CUMMINS, D P DARDIS, J M DEPUTY, DEIRDRE DIGIACOMO, JOSEPH DODSON, JON DUNKAS, N DUNLOP, C EL-HAYEK, SALIM ELLIS, ROBERT L ERWIN, JOHN D FRIESEN, JIM FULMER, THOMAS GAST, ROLLAND E GILBERT, W GRABLIN, PATRICK GRAND ADVENTURES LLC GREEBON, BOBBY HESS, GEORGE HOLBY, ERIC HOYNES, R J KACIK, T KAMMERER, KRISTEN KELLY, J KERR, RUSSELL KINDER, THOMAS KITSON, LEE KLINGES, JOHN (Cont'd) - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 79303 LAMERE, D LANG, JOHN E LEVETT, SIMON MAIN, VERNON J MALLETTE, MIKE MAREK, DENNIS MARTINEZ, PETE MCBRIDE, JAMES MCCORMICK, DUNCAN M MCWHIRTER, ROBERT J MEST, DARRYL MEYER, IVAN D MEYERAAN, CHARLES MONTMANN, WERNER MOYER, M L MUELLER, WAYNE MULLIGAN, T NEWTON, THOMAS NIKKEL, LARRY OPPOLD, MARK PETERSON, BERTIL PRATHER, CHARLES QUADY, DOUGLAS R RUMMLER, WILLIAM SAVAGE, W SHEA, JOHN SILVERBERG, LEE SLATON, JOHN SNOWTIME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SPRINGER, C SUPERCZYNSKI, M SWEASY, KENNETH W THOMAS, HARTLEY THOMPSON, H R UHLENHOP, ROBERT VESELICA, GREG VEUM, BRUCE VYCE, BRYAN WALLING, MIKE WARD, ROBERT WARNER, MICHAEL WICKARD, GRANT WICKLUND, GARY A WILLIAMS, FRANK M WOODS, GLEN ZELIGS, E ZROSTLIK, FRANCIS L - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A12 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 76718 INTEGRATED SERVICES - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A13 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 75487 FRASER SANITN DIST SWR LAGOON 77601 EAST GRND FIRE PRTCTION DST 4 77720 MOUNTAIN MADNESS SNOSCOOTS SNOSCOOTS/MOUNTAIN MADNESS 77849 COZENS RANCH MUSEUM 78253 SITZMARK LDG CHALETS & CABINS 78260 PROFESSIONAL RECVY GRND CNTY SPORT TRADER & LOAN 78336 LAST WALTZ INC (THE) WINTER PK FRAM SHP GLLRY INC 78515 BANK OF WINTER PARK 78622 CORNERSTONE RESORT TOURS GLENN GARY & CO INC METRO BROKERS INC 78737 EISENHART ENTERPRISES INC FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP 78746 GASTHAUS EICHLER 78841 GRAND COUNTY WATER & SANI 78878 ELK HORN REALTY INC RX HELP INC SOUTHLAND CORPORATION 78884 WINTER PARK ADVENTURES 78885 SUBWAY SANDWICHES 78911 SWISS HOUSE INC 78927 OVER YOUR HEAD SHIRT FCTRY 78930 CHOCOLATE FANTASY CHRISTY SPORTS LLC MARISSA J CORPORATION SANTAS HAUS 79075 SNOWBLAZA ATHLETIC CLUB SNOWBLAZE CONDOMINIUM RENTALS 79104 TASSET REALTY OF WINTER PARK 79303 BEAVER MANAGEMENT GROUP INC 79708 SNOWTIME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 81374 DENVER WATER DEPARTMENT - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A14 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 78542 SCHIESL, R 78572 ODEN, DEAN WENZEK, HELGA 78594 HOLZWARTH, BRAD HOLZWARTH, RICHARD J 78641 COLLINS, RICHARD 78670 LEIGHTON, TINA L MIKOL, MATTHEW P 78679 BRALLIAR, FLOYD GORDON, STEPHEN HARVEY, DONALD MALONE, C 78683 BAKER, SCOTT BUCHHEISTER, DON JOHNSON, KURT KAHRE, R MIKAWA, HENRY K PARKER, SCOTT PHILLIPPI, J SUGAR, MATTHEW J WHITE, C 78707 HUSSEIN, SAMER 78737 ADDINGTON, C J BREZACEK, LAD BYNUM, GROVER CANNON, TED C CLARK, AMOS DIXON, ROBERT E EVANSHOWE, CARLA FORMAN, ROGER FORTUNE, LOWELL FREDERICK, J W GIEFER, H G HEITMAN, STAN HENNEKEE, RICHARD HOWE, TERRY HYDRUSKO, M L JAMES, G G KENNEDY, JOHN J KIRSCH, RAY KRAMER, BERNARD OWENS, STEVE RHOADS, KAY SAFFER, S SEDLAR, JEAN H SIGMAN, STEVE TRAUB, RAYMOND W TUSSY, ERIC VANMETER, KENT WAISANEN, J (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A15 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 78737 ZICK, DEAN 78869 SUNDOWNER MOTEL 78911 KUTRUMBOS, A 78941 LANG, APRIL THOMAS, JACQUES 78960 HODDES, ERICK 79005 CARLSON, GEORGE 79050 ANDREWS, STEVE BUSSE, JAMES P BUTLER, DONALD HOLT, JOHN R HOWEY, JIM KRIZAN, ZDENKO MOLITOR, JOHN SABLOSKY, DANIEL URBAN, G K VANORT, RICHARD YIM, KWOK 79075 BRANNEN, WILLIAM CROSS, WILLIAM G DICK, JAMES EVANS, THOMAS FITTZ, DAVID GASKINS, ROBERT HANSON, JOHN HORWATH, ROBERT KACHOREK, JOE MCQUILLEN, JAMES STEPHENS, THOMAS STROBEL, DAVID SWENSON, MARK WEISBACH, PHILIP T 79104 DESENFANTS, J A GIBSON, L HABER, DAVE LARSEN, R J MEANS, FRANK L SCHMIDT, FRANK STEWART, WILLIAM TOWNER, ROBERT WELLS, GLEN WESTERBUHR, LLOYD 79303 ADKINS, EUGENE BARKER, ROBERT B BARON, ROBERT BENNING, TED BLANCHARD, F BOYD, ROBERT BURTIS, R CANNADAY, JAMES (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A16 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 79303 CARLSON, KEN CARR, CLAYTON CASPER, MICHAEL CLAFLIN, CHARLES E COFFMAN, RICHARD CUMMINS, D P CUSIC, WILLIAM D DARDIS, J M DIGIACOMO, JOSEPH DODSON, JON DURNFORD, SIMON EASLAND, MARK EFFKER, BRIAN ELHAYEK, SALIM ELLIS, RONALD ERWIN, JOHN D FELDPOUCH, MICHAEL L FERREL, ROBERT FLORA, WARE FRIESEN, JIM FULMER, THOMAS GADE, ROBERT GAINES, STEVE GAINS, WILLIAM F GAMBLE, ROBERT GAST, ROLLAND E GILBERT, W GOLDSTEIN, JAY GORDON, RICHARD GRAY, MARK A GRAYSON, CHARLES GREEBON, BOBBY HAMER, JOHN HEIT, ROGER HENNESSY, RICHARD C HESPRICH, GLEN HESS, GEORGE HESSL, STEPHEN HOYNES, R J HUTT, MARTIN P HYMUS, FRANCIS C JUHAS, ALLAN KALETH, L KELLY, PATRICK E KERR, RUSSELL KINDER, THOMAS KLINGES, JOHN KONSEVICH, JAMES L LAMERE, D LOPEZ, CARLOS (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A17 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 79303 MALLETTE, MIKE MAREK, DENNIS MARTIN, JOHN MASUDA, AMY MCBRIDE, JAMES MCCLURE, ROBERT MCWHIRTER, ROBERT J MEST, DARRYL MEYER, IVAN D MEYERAAN, CHUCK MEZRAH, JACK MICHEL, NORMAN E MONTMANN, WERNER MOONEN, THOMAS NEDDERMAN, THOMAS NEWTON, THOMAS NICHOLS, RICHARD NIKKEL, LARRY NORTON, DENNIS PAYTE, HAROLD PETERSON, BERTIL PEYSER, M A POWERS, G PRATHER, CHARLES PRATHER, GAIL PROBST, ROBERT QUADY, DOUGLAS R QUATROCHI, PETE RAY, MICHAEL RAYMOND, BILL REEVES, JOHN REYNOLDS, CHARLES ROBERTSON, A J JR RUDOLF, JIM RUMMLER, WILLIAM RUSSELL, MARTIN F SACCO, PAUL SAVAGE, W SENIO, PAUL SHEA, JOHN SHEWMAKER, JOYCE SILVERBERG, LEE SLATON, JOHN STAHL, LEONARD STAHL, WILLIAM STALEY, IRMGARD STEVENS, R L STONGE, CARY SUPERCZYNSKI, M SUR, ROBERT G (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A18 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 79303 TATELMAN, KAREN THOMAS, GARRY O THOMAS, HARTLEY THOMPSON, H R TOMCHEK, STEPHEN TRIMBLE, JAMES E UHLENHOP, ROBERT VESELICA, GREG VEUM, BRUCE WALLING, MIKE WARNER, MICHAEL WHITE, RICH WICKLUND, GARY A WILLIAMS, FRANK M WRIGHT, RANDY ZELIGS, E ZINK, PHILLIP ZROSTLIK, FRANCIS L 79307 WILLIAMS, CLAY 79505 ANDRUS, BIL 79708 CRAWFORD, THOMAS 83874 CUSTER, RON - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A19 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 76805 WINTER PARK RESORT SERVICES - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A20 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 78294 LA BOUDREAUX OFFICE SUPPLY 78436 ROCKY MOUNTAIN ENGINEERS SNOWY RANGE INC 78459 WINTER PARK TRAVEL INC 78515 BANK OF WINTER PARK 78622 ASSOCIATED RE OF WINTER PARK 78737 EISENHART ENTERPRISES INC FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP 78841 GRAND COUNTY WATER & SANI JOHNSON MEDIA INCORPORATED 78876 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 78878 RX H E L P INC SOUTHLAND CORPORATION 78911 SWISS HOUSE INC 78930 CALDWELL BANKER INC CHOCOLATE FANTASY STALKER INC 78941 LE SKI LAB 79104 TASSET REALTY OF WINTER PARK 79303 BEAVER MANAGEMENT GROUP INC 79708 SNOWTIME LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 81374 DENVER WATER DEPARTMENT 82497 COLORADO STATE GOVERNMENT - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A21 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 76718 ROBERTS, GARY G 77601 EUCKER, D KRAMER, RICHARD LEUTI, DAVE 77875 GOTTSCHALK, ANDREW 78260 DAVIDSON, JEFF 78292 KRAMER, BIFF 78336 CHRISTENSEN, WENDY ENGEL, GEORGE G JR STADELMAN, AL 78436 GROSSMAN, TERRY HUNT, MICHAEL PRENDERGAST, TOM 78515 MORRISON, JOHN 78521 KREUTZFELDT, TERESA 78542 SCHIESL, R 78572 ODEN, DEAN WENZEK, HELGA 78594 HOLZWARTH, RICHARD J 78669 DODDS, BETH 78679 ABERNATHY, CHARLES BRALLIAR, FLOYD BURDICK, BETTY MALONE, C WILDERMAN, TODD 78683 BUCHHEISTER, DON KAHRESYLVESTER, K PARKER, SCOTT TROTTER, JAMES S YOUNGE, S L 78707 HUSSEIN, SAMER 78737 CANNON, TED C CLARK, AMOS DIETERICH, CAROLYN S EVANSHOWE, CARLA FORMAN, ROGER HEITMAN, STAN HOWE, TERRY JAMES, G G KENNEDY, JOHN J KIMURA, TOM KRAMER, BERNARD MOLLER, GARY RHOADS, KAY SAFFER, S SANNAN, STUART SEDLAR, PAT SIGMAN, STEVE STUKENHOLTZ, LOUIS TRAUB, RAYMOND W (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A22 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 78737 VANMETER, KENT WALKER, GARRY E ZICK, DEAN 78786 EICHLER, HANS O 78869 STRATOS, KOSTAS S SUNDOWNER MOTEL 78885 ACTIVE IMAGES 78902 BERGER, SCOTT 78911 KUTRUMBOS, A 78941 LANG, APRIL THOMAS, JACQUES 78960 LAPORTE, RANDY 79075 CROSS, WILLIAM G EVANS, THOMAS GIBSON, GRANT MCQUILLEN, JAMES STEPHENS, THOMAS STRESS, JAMES STROBEL, DAVID SWENSON, MARK WERMELSKIRCHEN, BOB 79104 DESENFANTS, J A GRIMALDI, GARY LARSEN, R J MEANS, FRANK L SCHMIDT, FRANK STEWART, WILLIAM WELLS, GLEN WESTERBUHR, LLOYD WOLL, ALFRED 79303 ADKINS, EUGENE BALL, GARY BARON, ROBERT BEUTELSCHIESS, J BLANCHARD, F BLOCK, LEONARD N BOYD, ROBERT BROWN, R W BURTIS, R CARLSON, KEN CARR, CLAYTON CHASE, H P COFFMAN, RICHARD COLTHURST, JAMES A CUMMINS, D P CUSIC, WILLIAM D DALBY, LEASE DARDIS, J M DAVIS, JOE B DEROSIA, VIC (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A23 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 79303 DIGIACOMO, JOSEPH DODSON, JON DUNTON, CLAY EBINS, DENNIS R ELLIS, RONALD ERWIN, JOHN D FERREL, ROBERT FRANK, GENE FRIESEN, JIM FULMER, THOMAS GADE, ROBERT GAINES, STEVE GAINS, WILLIAM F GAST, ROLLAND E GILBERT, W GILMAN, P GLEASON, MONTE GOLDSTEIN, JAY GORDON, RICHARD GRAY, MARK A GREENE, JOE E HACKETT, KENNETH R HALL, JOSEPH W HAMER, JOHN HEIT, ROBERT HELMING, BILL HESPRICH, GLEN HESS, GEORGE HESSL, STEPHEN HODGE, ROBERT HOLDINGS, J T HOYNES, R J HUTT, MARTIN P HYMUS, FRANCIS C JACKSON, ROBERT JUHAS, ALLAN JURGENS, BARBARA KERR, RUSSELL KINDER, THOMAS KITTS, DAVID KLINGES, JOHN LIETZKE, JOHN A LOPEZ, CARLOS LUCEY, ARTHUR J MADSEN, DONALD MALLETTE, MIKE MAREK, DENNIS MASUDA, AMY MCCLURE, ROBERT MCCORMICK, DUNCAN M (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A24 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 79303 MCWHIRTER, ROBERT J MEST, DARRYL MEYER, IVAN D MEZRAH, JACK MICHEL, NORMAN E MONTMANN, WERNER MOONEN, THOMAS NEDDERMAN, THOMAS NEWTON, THOMAS NICHOLS, RICHARD NIETERS, JOSEPH NIKKEL, HARVEY NORTON, DENNIS OGRADY, THOMAS M OLIVER, BRUCE J ORDWAY, GARY PAYTE, HAROLD PETERSON, BERTIL PEYSER, M A POWERS, GRAHAM PRATHER, CHARLES PROBST, ROBERT QUADY, DOUGLAS R QUATROCHI, PETE RAMBAUD, SERGE RAYMOND, BILL REEVES, JOHN REPKO, RICHARD REYNOLDS, CHARLES ROBERTSON, A J JR ROBY, PETER RUDOLF, JIM RUMMLER, WILLIAM SACCO, PAUL SAVAGE, W SENIO, PAUL SLATON, JOHN SMITH, AVERY STAHL, LEONARD STAHL, W STALEY, IRMGARD STEVENS, R L TATELMAN, KAREN THOMAS, GARY O THOMPSON, H R TOMCHEK, STEPHEN TRIMBLE, JAMES E UHLENHOP, ROBERT VERYSER, THOMAS J VESELICA, GREG (Cont'd) - US HIGHWAY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A25 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 79303 VEUM, BRUCE WARNER, MICHAEL WICKLUND, GARY A WILLIAMS, FRANK M WOLFF, CHARLES WRIGHT, RANDY ZINK, A ZINK, P ZINK, PHILLIP ZROSTLIK, FRANCIS L - US HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A26 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 76805 WINTER PARK RESORT SERVICES - U S HWY 40 EDR Digital Archive 5848061.5 Page: A27 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1987 76805 ARKAE DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED CENTURY 21 CORNERSTN LAND/MGMT 77601 EAST GRAND FIRE PROT DST #4 78259 SITZMARK SKI LODGE&GUEST RANCH 78294 LA BOUDREAUX OFFICE SUPPLY 78336 FLICKS THE PLANT ORPHANAGE & FLORIST THE WINTER PARK CHMBR OF COMMERCE WINTER PARK RESORT CHAMBER OF 78436 DRAKE DON REALTY CO RON DRAKE ENGINEERING SNOWY RANGE INC 78459 WINTER PARK TRAVEL INC 78515 BANK OF WINTER PARK* 78622 ASSOC RL 78711 EMPORIUM THE 78715 OLDER THAN ME ANTIQUES 78737 FARMER S INSURANE GROUP FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP 78821 CHEN & ASSOCIATES GRANDLAKE PLUMBING CO 78841 JOHNSON MEDIA INCORPORATED 78878 7-ELEVEN STORE NO 22193 78884 CORONA STATION RESTAURANT 78911 SWISS HOUSE INC 78927 COMIC T-SHIRTS 78930 ASPEN SAVINGS & LOAN FLOWERS BY KATIE JACKSON HOOVER RAGSDALE R E M A X RESORTS OF WINTER REMAX RESORTS OF GRAND COUNTY SPORT STALKER 78941 LE SKI LAB 79050 ST MORITZ 79104 SNOWBLAZE DEVELOPMENT CORP 79303 VILLAGE SKI & SPORTS AT BVR VL - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 1924 TP, Fraser, 1924, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 1926 TP, Fraser, 1926, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 1943 TP, FRASER, 1943, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 1957 TP, Fraser, 1957, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 1973 TP, Fraser, 1973, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 2013 TP, Fraser, 2013, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report Grand Park 46 Market Street Fraser, CO 80442 Prepared for US Bank 950 17th St., 12th Floor Denver, CO 80202 Prepared by Corn and Associates 3625 Raleigh Street Denver, CO 80212 Phone: (303) 433-8577 Job Number: USB-699 02/08/2012 Powered By PARCEL Table of Contents Detail Report 1......................................................................................................................................................................... General Information 2.......................................................................................................................................................... 1.0 Executive Summary 3................................................................................................................................................... 1.1 Subject Property Description 3............................................................................................................................... 1.2 Environmental Report Summary 3......................................................................................................................... 1.3 Data Gaps 4............................................................................................................................................................ 1.4 Findings and Opinions 4......................................................................................................................................... 1.5 Recommendations 4............................................................................................................................................... 2.0 Introduction 5................................................................................................................................................................ 2.1 Purpose 5............................................................................................................................................................... 2.2 Scope of Services 5................................................................................................................................................ 2.3 Deviations 5............................................................................................................................................................ 2.4 Limitations 5............................................................................................................................................................ 2.5 Reliance 6............................................................................................................................................................... 3.0 Subject Property Description 7..................................................................................................................................... 3.1 Location and Legal Description 7........................................................................................................................... 3.2 Activity and Use Limitations 7................................................................................................................................. 3.3 Physical Setting 7................................................................................................................................................... 3.4 Subject Property and Vicinity Characteristics 7...................................................................................................... 3.5 Description of Subject Property Structures and Improvements 8........................................................................... 3.6 Current Uses of the Subject Property 8.................................................................................................................. 4.0 User Provided Information 9.......................................................................................................................................... 4.1 Environmental Liens 9............................................................................................................................................ 4.2 Environmental Reports or Investigations 9............................................................................................................. 4.3 Experience of User 9.............................................................................................................................................. 5.0 Historical Use Information 10........................................................................................................................................ 5.1 Historical Background 10........................................................................................................................................ 5.2 Subject Property 10................................................................................................................................................ 5.3 Adjoining Properties 10.......................................................................................................................................... 5.4 Historically Significant or Environmental Findings 10............................................................................................. 6.0 Federal, State, Local & Tribal Database Listings 11...................................................................................................... 7.0 Site Reconnaissance 12............................................................................................................................................... 7.1 Hazardous Substances 12...................................................................................................................................... 7.2 Unidentified Containers 12..................................................................................................................................... 7.3 Staining 12.............................................................................................................................................................. 7.4 Stressed Vegetation 12........................................................................................................................................... 7.5 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)12.................................................................................................................. 7.6 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)12.................................................................................................................. 7.7 Pits, Ponds, And Lagoons 12.................................................................................................................................. 7.8 PCB-Containing Equipment 12............................................................................................................................... 7.9 Solid Waste Disposal 12......................................................................................................................................... 7.10 Wetlands 12.......................................................................................................................................................... 7.11 Septic System with On-Site Drainfield 13............................................................................................................. 7.12 Oil/Water Separator 13......................................................................................................................................... 7.13 Dry Wells or Injection Wells 13............................................................................................................................. 7.14 Contamination of Soil 13....................................................................................................................................... 7.15 Contamination of Groundwater 13........................................................................................................................ 7.16 Vapor Intrusion 13................................................................................................................................................. 7.17 Use of Pesticides on Site 13................................................................................................................................. Table of Contents 7.18 Other Concerns 13............................................................................................................................................... 7.18.1 Asbestos 13................................................................................................................................................. 7.18.2 Lead 13....................................................................................................................................................... 7.18.3 Radon 13..................................................................................................................................................... 7.18.4 Lead in Drinking Water 14........................................................................................................................... 7.18.5 Mold 14........................................................................................................................................................ 7.18.6 All Other Concerns 14................................................................................................................................. 8.0 Interviews 15................................................................................................................................................................. Appendices Appendix A Qualifications 16.................................................................................................................................................... Appendix B Figures 18............................................................................................................................................................. Appendix C Photographs 21..................................................................................................................................................... Appendix D Historical Research Documentation 34................................................................................................................. Appendix E Regulatory Records Documentation 36................................................................................................................ Appendix F Miscellaneous Information 117.............................................................................................................................. Detail Report Project No. USB-699 General Information Project Information: 12-000220-01 - Grand Park Project Number:USB-699 RIMS Project #:12-000220-01 Site Information: Grand Park 46 Market Street Fraser, CO 80442 County:Grand Latitude, Longitude:39.925900, -105.812100 Site Access Contact: Consultant Information: Corn and Associates 3625 Raleigh Street Denver, CO 80212 Phone:(303) 433-8577 Fax:303-455-1123 E-mail Address:fredcorn@comcast.net Inspection Date:02/06/2012 Report Date:02/08/2012 Client Information: US Bank Karla Thomas 950 17th St., 12th Floor Denver, CO 80202 Site Assessor: Frederick Corn P.E. Senior Reviewer: Frederick Corn P.E. EP Certification: I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 312.10 of this part. Frederick Corn - P.E. Standard Certification: I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Frederick Corn - P.E. Page 2 Project No. USB-699 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Subject Property Description The subject property includes approximately 1,700 acres in the Grand Park Development in Fraser, Colorado. Most of the subject property is vacant, unimproved land; however, it includes five single-family houses that were constructed in 2009, and a real estate office and general store that were also constructed in 2009. The general store includes retail gasoline sales; the site has five underground storage tanks installed in 2008. A portion of the north end of the subject property has been developed as the Colorado Adventure Park, which includes a tubing hill, and a snow scoot course. The subject property includes a large meadow along the floor of the Fraser River Valley, and also a steeply sloped ridge along the west side of the valley. The Union Pacific Railroad crosses the subject property from north to south along the lower slope of the ridge. The higher, steeper slopes were once heavily wooded, but were recently logged to remove beetle-killed trees. 1.2 Environmental Report Summary Corn & Associates has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the above referenced property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 2.3 of this report. This assessment has identified several areas of concern summarized in the table below and further described in Sections 1.4 and 1.5 of this report. Report Section Results Recommendations Cost Estimate Range 1.3 Data Gaps No Risk None 3.2 Activity and Use Limitations No Risk None 4.1 Environmental Liens No Risk None 5.1 Historical Background No Risk None 5.2 Subject Property No Risk None 5.3 Adjoining Properties No Risk None 6.0 Federal, State, Local & Tribal Database Listings No Risk None 7.1 Hazardous Substances No Risk None 7.2 Unidentified Containers No Risk None 7.3 Staining No Risk None 7.4 Stressed Vegetation No Risk None 7.5 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) No Risk None 7.6 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) No Risk None 7.7 Pits, Ponds, And Lagoons No Risk None 7.8 PCB-Containing Equipment No Risk None 7.9 Solid Waste Disposal No Risk None 7.10 Wetlands No Risk None 7.11 Septic System with On-Site Drainfield No Risk None 7.12 Oil/Water Separator No Risk None 7.13 Dry Wells or Injection Wells No Risk None 7.14 Contamination of Soil No Risk None 7.15 Contamination of Groundwater No Risk None 7.16 Vapor Intrusion No Risk None 7.17 Use of Pesticides on Site No Risk None 7.18.1 Asbestos No Risk None 7.18.2 Lead No Risk None 7.18.3 Radon No Risk None 7.18.4 Lead in Drinking Water No Risk None 7.18.5 Mold No Risk None 7.18.6 All Other Concerns No Risk None 8.0 Interviews No Risk None Page 3 Project No. USB-699 1.0 Executive Summary (continued) 1.3 Data Gaps Corn & Associates did not document any significant data gaps during the preparation of this Environmental Site Assessment. 1.4 Findings and Opinions Corn & Associates has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 of approximately 1,700 acres in the Grand Park development in Fraser, Colorado, the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in this report. The assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Several 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon buckets of new and used oil are stored without secondary containment on a dirt surface in the maintenance area. Corn & Associates observed minor surface soil staining around the containers. 1.5 Recommendations Several 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon buckets of new and used oil are stored without secondary containment on a dirt surface in the maintenance area. Corn & Associates observed minor surface soil staining around the containers. Corn & Associates recommends that adequate secondary containment be provided. Page 4 Project No. USB-699 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Purpose The following conditions apply to the completion of this Phase One Environmental Site Assessment: • The purpose of this report is to identify recognized environmental conditions of the subject property in conjunction with the ASTM E 1527 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. • A recognized environmental condition is defined under the ASTM Standard as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. • The ASTM E 1527 standard practice is designed to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. • This ASTM standard practice is intended to constitute “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” (42 USC § 9601 (35)(B)). 2.2 Scope of Services The Phase I ESA conducted at the Subject Property was in general accordance with ASTM Standard E 1527-05 and included the following: - Review of previous environmental site assessments; - Records review; - Interviews with regulatory officials and personnel associated with the subject and adjoining properties; - A site visit; and - Evaluation of information and preparation of the report provided herein. Typically, a Phase I ESA does not include sampling or testing of air, soil, groundwater, surface water, or building materials. These activities would be carried out in a Phase II ESA, if required. For this Phase I ESA, no additions to the ASTM E 1527-05 standard were made with the exception of the following: None. This document has been prepared in accordance with the specifications set forth in the US Bancorp assignment letter dated January 25, 2012 for the subject property. 2.3 Deviations No deviations from the recommended scope of ASTM Standard E 1527-05 were performed as part of this Phase I ESA with the exception of any additions noted in Detailed Scope of Services. 2.4 Limitations This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted in accordance with current industry standards and practices. Corn & Associates conducted this assessment specifically for the use of U.S. Bancorp and their authorized representatives. Any reliance on this report by another party shall be at such party's sole risk. The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. The conclusions and recommendations presented represent Corn & Associates' best judgment based on the data obtained from the work. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, Corn & Associates cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities that are beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA. A Phase I ESA is not an all encompassing investigation. It a professional investigation with a limited scope based on reasonably obtainable information that an experienced professional practicing due care could be expected to obtain or observe and evaluate. Conclusions and recommendations presented in this report should not be construed as legal advice. Page 5 Project No. USB-699 2.0 Introduction (continued) 2.4 Limitations (continued) As our work included review of information provided by others, we assume no responsibility for conditions not revealed or observed during our investigation or for conditions not generally recognized as environmentally unacceptable at the time this report was prepared. The information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein apply only to the subject property as it existed during Corn & Associates' site reconnaissance. Should site use or conditions change, information, conclusions, and recommendations herein no longer apply. 2.5 Reliance This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of U.S. Bancorp, the client. The report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Corn & Associates and U.S. Bancorp. Page 6 Project No. USB-699 3.0 Subject Property Description 3.1 Location and Legal Description The subject property includes approximately 1,700 acres located along the west side of U.S. Highway 40 in Fraser, Colorado. The subject property is located in portions of Sections 19, 20, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32, Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Grand, State of Colorado. 3.2 Activity and Use Limitations No environmental liens or activity and use limitations (AULs) were reported for the subject property. Portions of the property lie within an area zoned PD for Planned Development by the Town of Fraser. Other areas are zoned for business uses. 3.3 Physical Setting The subject property is located along the floor of the Fraser River Valley, and also on the lower slopes of the mountains on the west side of the valley. Elevations range from approximately 8,600 feet above mean sea level on the valley floor, to 9,400 feet above mean sea level in the southwest corner of the site. Geology The floor of the Fraser River Valley is characterized by Tertiary rocks concealed by stream-deposited glacial debris. The surrounding mountains, including the higher elevations of the subject property, are characterized by metamorphic gneiss and schist. Hydrogeology The depth to groundwater varies across the subject property. The shallowest groundwater is found in the flat meadow along the valley floor on the east side of the property, where groundwater is found between 5 and 10 feet below ground surface. Groundwater is expected to follow the topography and flow to the east and northeast, toward the Fraser River. Surface water The nearest significant surface water features are Elk Creek, which flows from southwest to northeast across the middle of the property, Leland Creek, which flows from southwest to northeast along the south end of the property, and St. Louis Creek, which flows from southwest to northeast several hundred yards north of the subject property. All three of these creeks flow into the Fraser River which flows from southeast to northwest, approximately 200 yards east of the subject property. 3.4 Subject Property and Vicinity Characteristics North: The subject property is bordered on the north by County Road 73, vacant land, several residential and commercial properties. Commercial properties include a bank, and two shopping centers. Occupants of the shopping centers include a supermarket, restaurants, ski shops, offices, and a liquor store. South: The subject property is bordered on the south by a new bowling alley that is under construction, single family residential properties, and vacant land in the Arapaho National Forest. East: The subject property is bordered on the east by US Highway 40 and several commercial properties along both the east and west sides of the highway. Commercial properties include a liquor store, a bank, a fire station, a museum, and a recreation center. West: The subject property is bordered on the west by Byers Peak Ranch and vacant land owned by Denver Water. No evidence of spills, releases, or other environmental conditions was observed on any properties in the vicinity of the site. Page 7 Project No. USB-699 3.0 Subject Property Description (continued) 3.5 Description of Subject Property Structures and Improvements The subject property includes approximately 1,700 acres in the Grand Park development in Fraser, Colorado. Most of the subject property is vacant, unimproved land; however, it includes five single-family houses, and a real estate office and general store that were constructed in 2009. The general store includes retail gasoline sales; the site has five underground storage tanks installed in 2008, including two 18,000-gallon diesel tanks, one 18,000-gallon regular gasoline tank, one 10,000-gallon premium gasoline tank, and one 10,000-gallon E-85 fuel tank. The tanks are all properly registered with the Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS), and all include the required vapor recovery systems, and electronic inventory and leak detection systems. According to OPS records there have been no violations or releases at the site. A portion of the north end of the subject property has been developed as the Colorado Adventure Park, which includes a tubing hill, and a snow scoot course. The Adventure Park office is located in a prefabricated building and two steel storage containers. The Grand Park maintenance area is also located at the north end of the property. The maintenance area includes two tent structures that are used for materials storage and equipment and vehicle repair. Several 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon buckets of new and used oil are stored without secondary containment on a dirt surface in the maintenance area. Corn & Associates observed minor surface soil staining around the containers. The maintenance area is also used to store vehicles, construction equipment, and several large mounds of fill dirt. The subject property includes a large meadow along the floor of the Fraser River Valley, and also a steeply sloped ridge along the west side of the valley. In 2009 several augmentation ponds were excavated in the meadow. The Union Pacific Railroad crosses the subject property from north to south along the lower slope of the ridge. The higher, steeper slopes were once heavily wooded, but were recently logged to remove beetle-killed trees. 3.6 Current Uses of the Subject Property The subject property includes approximately 1,700 acres in the Grand Park Development in Fraser, Colorado. Most of the subject property is vacant, unimproved land; however, it includes five single-family houses that were constructed in 2009, and a real estate office and general store constructed in 2009. The general store includes retail gasoline sales; the site has five underground storage tanks installed in 2008. A portion of the north end of the subject property has been developed as the Colorado Adventure Park, which includes a tubing hill, and a snow scoot course. The subject property includes a large meadow along the floor of the Fraser River Valley, and also a steeply sloped ridge along the west side of the valley. The Union Pacific Railroad crosses the subject property from north to south along the lower slope of the ridge. The higher, steeper slopes were once heavily wooded, but were recently logged to remove beetle-killed trees. Page 8 Project No. USB-699 4.0 User Provided Information 4.1 Environmental Liens No environmental liens were reported for the subject property. 4.2 Environmental Reports or Investigations No environmental reports or investigations were provided. 4.3 Experience of User The user did not report any specialized knowledge or experience that suggests an environmental concern or recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. Page 9 Project No. USB-699 5.0 Historical Use Information 5.1 Historical Background Interviews with Mr. Bob Butler, Construction Manager for Grand Park; and Mr. Clark Lipscomb, with Cornerstone Holdings LLC, and Grand Park Development LLC, the owners of the subject property; the Grand County Assessor's files; U.S. Geological Survey maps from 1926 and 1957; and historical aerial photographs available at Colorado Aerial Photograph Services in Denver were used to research site history. Three sets of photographs were reviewed: September 10, 1946; June 22, 1978; and September 9, 1996. 5.2 Subject Property The subject property historically consisted of hay fields, open range, and wooded forest land. As early as 1946 there were several ranch structures at the north end of the property, the low lands along the valley floor were made up of large hay fields, and the rest of the property was wooded. At that time the only structures in the surrounding area included a few ranch buildings, and a small number of houses on several streets in the Town of Fraser just north of the subject property. The Union Pacific Railroad crossed the property, and Highway 40 ran along the east side of the property, but there were no other significant roads in the area. The current owners, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings LLC and Grand Park Development LLC, assembled the Grand Park Development site in the 2000s. Previously, the various parcels that make up the subject property were owned by the Johns Family, the Byers Peak Ranch, and the Denver Water Board. 5.3 Adjoining Properties The surrounding area historically consisted of hay fields, open range, and wooded forest land. As early as 1946 the only structures in the surrounding area included a few ranch buildings, and a small number of houses on several streets in the Town of Fraser just north of the subject property. The Union Pacific Railroad crossed the property, and Highway 40 ran along the east side of the property, but there were no other significant roads in the area. Most commercial development in the area started in the 1980s, when shopping centers, banks, and restaurants were constructed along Highway 40. The recreation center adjacent to the Grand Park general store was constructed in 2008. 5.4 Historically Significant or Environmental Findings No historically significant or environmental findings were discovered within the scope of this investigation in connection with the subject property or adjoining properties. Page 10 Project No. USB-699 6.0 Federal, State, Local & Tribal Database Listings An ASTM-compliant government records radial database report was obtained for this assessment. The following standard Federal database listings were searched if available: National Priorities List (NPL), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS and CERCLIS-NFRAP), Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System - Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (RCRIS-TSD), RCRIS - Large and Small Quantity Generators (RCRIS-Generator), RCRIS Corrective Action Data (CORRACTS), RCRIS Notifiers (NOTIFIERS) and Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS). Criteria for being listed on each database and specific facility information are reviewed within the database report (see Appendix E). within the database report (see Appendix E). The subject property, identified as the General Store at 46 Market Street, was identified as a UST site. This facility is located on the east side of the subject property, along US Highway 40. Five USTs were installed at this location in October 2008, including two 18,000-gallon diesel USTs, one 18,000-gallon unleaded regular UST, one 10,000-gallon unleaded premium UST, and one 10,000-gallon E-85 UST. Due to the size of the subject property, the search radii for the various databases were extended by 1.5 miles. Various environmental sites, including several LUST sites and a CORRACTS site, were identified within their respective search radii.These sites either have been closed by the appropriate agency, or due their distance and direction they are not considered to have the potential to impact the subject property. The environmental database report also identifies "unmapped" sites that could not be located either because of a lack of information provided or Environmental Data Resources' mapping capabilities. Twenty-seven unmapped sites, including AST, UST, LUST, and RCRIS sites were identified by the EDR report. Based on the information provided, three of these sites appear to be in the vicinity of the subject property. The Liquor Barn at 76827 Highway 40 and the East Grand County Fire Protection District #4 at 77601 Highway 40 were identified as UST and LUST sites. Both of these sites have been issued "No Further Action Required" letters from the OPS, and therefore, they are not considered to have the potential to impact the subject property. The Town Center at First Street and Highway 40 was identified as a NPDES site (a facility permitted by the Water Quality Control Division). Database List Subject Property Listings Total Number of Listings Environmental Concern Posed to the Subject Property Federal NPL Sites (< 2.5 mile)0 0 None Federal CERCLIS Sites (< 2.0 mile)0 0 None Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Sites (Property & Adjoining) 0 0 None RCRA CORRACTS Sites (< 2.5 mile)0 1 None RCRA TSD Facilities (< 2.0 mile)0 0 None RCRA SQG (Target & Adjacent)0 0 None RCRA LQG (Target & Adjacent)0 0 None Federal ERNS Sites (Target Property Only) 0 N/A None State HW Sites (< 1 mile)N/A N/A N/A State CERCLIS Sites (< 0.5 mile)N/A N/A N/A Landfill/SW Disposal Sites (< 2.0 mile)0 0 None LUST Sites (< 2.0 mile)0 7 None UST/AST Sites (Property & Adjacent)1 8 None State VCP Sites (< 2.0 mile)0 0 None Page 11 Project No. USB-699 7.0 Site Reconnaissance 7.1 Hazardous Substances No hazardous substances that constitute evidence of a recognized environmental condition were observed at the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. Several 55-gallon drums and 5-gallon buckets of new and used oil are stored without secondary containment on a dirt surface in the maintenance area. Corn & Associates observed minor surface soil staining around the containers. Corn & Associates recommends that adequate secondary containment be provided. 7.2 Unidentified Containers No unidentified containers that constitute evidence of a recognized environmental condition were observed at the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.3 Staining No unidentified staining that constitutes evidence of a recognized environmental condition was observed at the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.4 Stressed Vegetation No unidentified stressed vegetation that constitutes evidence of a recognized environmental condition was observed at the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.5 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) No aboveground storage tanks were observed on the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.6 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) The subject property includes a retail gas station at 46 Market Street. Five USTs were installed at this location in October 2008, including two 18,000-gallon diesel USTs, one 18,000-gallon unleaded regular UST, one 10,000-gallon unleaded premium UST, and one 10,000-gallon E-85 UST. The tanks are all properly registered with the Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS), and all include the required vapor recovery systems, and electronic inventory and leak detection systems. According to OPS records there have been no violations or releases at the site. 7.7 Pits, Ponds, And Lagoons No pits, ponds or lagoons associated with onsite processes were observed at the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.8 PCB-Containing Equipment No PCB-containing equipment was identified during the site reconnaissance. 7.9 Solid Waste Disposal No indications of improper disposal of solid waste or burial activities were noted within the scope of this investigation. 7.10 Wetlands There are approximately fifty acres of wetland areas along Leland Creek and Elk Creek that lie within designated open space areas. Page 12 Project No. USB-699 7.0 Site Reconnaissance (continued) 7.10 Wetlands (continued) 7.11 Septic System with On-Site Drainfield The Colorado Adventure Park, located at the north end of the subject property, includes a septic system. The Adventure Park opened in 2009. 7.12 Oil/Water Separator Corn & Associates did not observe any oil/water separators at the subject property. 7.13 Dry Wells or Injection Wells No dry wells or injection wells were observed on the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.14 Contamination of Soil Corn & Associates did not find any evidence of soil contamination at the subject property, nor was any contaminated soil observed at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.15 Contamination of Groundwater Corn & Associates did not find any evidence of groundwater contamination at the subject property. 7.16 Vapor Intrusion No evidence of contamination which would suggest the potential impact of vapor intrusion on the subject property was noted within the scope of this investigation. 7.17 Use of Pesticides on Site No evidence of pesticide use was observed on the subject property at the time of the site reconnaissance. 7.18 Other Concerns 7.18.1 Asbestos A visual screening for suspect asbestos-containing materials was conducted at the time of the site reconnaissance. All of the materials observed appeared to be in good condition. Based on the post-1980 construction date of the buildings on the subject property, the presence of asbestos-containing materials appears unlikely. 7.18.2 Lead A visual screening for lead-based paint was conducted at the time of the site reconnaissance. All of the painted surfaces observed appeared to be in good condition. Based on the post-1978 construction dates of the buildings on the subject property, the presence of lead-based paint appears unlikely. 7.18.3 Radon The EPA has designated three zones of classification indicating the predicted average indoor screening level of radon per county. Grand County, Colorado is classified in Zone 1 (high potential) which indicates a predicted level greater than 4 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The EPA "Action Level" is 4 pCi/L. Based on the commercial nature of portions of the property, radon does not appear to be a concern in those areas. Page 13 Project No. USB-699 7.0 Site Reconnaissance (continued) 7.18 Other Concerns (continued) 7.18.3 Radon (continued) The subject property includes five single-family residences that were constructed in 2009 and are not currently occupied. Prior to their sale or occupation, testing will be required to determine site-specific radon levels. 7.18.4 Lead in Drinking Water Lead containing materials were banned from use in public water systems, including plumbing connection, in 1986. The buildings on the subject property were constructed since 1986; therefore, potable water testing and assessment was not performed on the subject property. 7.18.5 Mold Corn & Associates did not sample the subject property for mold. Accessible interior areas of several of the buildings were inspected for evidence of excessive or amplified mold growth. Corn & Associates did not observe any water damage or intrusions, or other conditions favorable for mold growth. 7.18.6 All Other Concerns No other areas of environmental concern were noted within the scope of this investigation. Page 14 Project No. USB-699 8.0 Interviews Corn & Associates contacted Ms. Catherine Trotter with the Town of Fraser; Mr. Bob Butler, Construction Manager for Grand Park; and Mr. Clark Lipscomb, with Cornerstone Holdings LLC, and Grand Park Development LLC, the owners of the subject property. Corn & Associates was unable to interview any previous owners. Page 15 Appendix A: Qualifications FREDERICK CORN, P.E. Expertise Environmental Due Diligence Water and Soil Remediation Environmental Compliance Academic B.S., (1985), Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Background M.S., (1989), Environmental Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Registration Colorado Registered Professional Engineer No. 30526 Experience Mr. Corn's professional experience includes the following: ♦ Conducted Phase I and Phase II site assessments and due diligence audits for hundreds of commercial and industrial properties. ♦ Conducted site investigations, prepared corrective action plans, managed cleanup activities, and obtained closure at various leaking underground storage tank sites. ♦ Prepared corrective action plans and negotiated closure at numerous sites under the Colorado Voluntary Cleanup Program. ♦ Managed regulatory compliance activities for a variety of manufacturing facilities. Compliance experience includes air permitting, wastewater discharge permitting, toxic release inventory reporting, preparing spill prevention control and countermeasures (SPCC) plans, developing hazardous waste training programs, hazard communication programs, and hazardous waste contingency plans. ♦ Prepared air permits and conducted air emissions inventories for a variety of industrial facilities including chemical manufacturers, paint shops, snack food plants, electroplating shops, print shops, batch plants, and electronics manufacturing facilities. ♦ Conducted Phase I and Phase II Site Assessments at the former Lowry Air Force Base. The site assessments were conducted for the Lowry Redevelopment Authority, home builders, and commercial developers. Investigated parcels have since been developed as senior housing, residential subdivisions, office buildings, a church, and a high school. ♦ Prepared RCRA Corrective Measures Studies and CERCLA feasibility studies for a variety of sites, including a petroleum refinery, a defense industry site, U.S. Air Force landfills, and a mine. Professional Corn & Associates, Denver, Colorado (1996-present) History Dames & Moore, Denver, Colorado (1993-1996) Eder Associates Consulting Engineers, Locust Valley, New York (1990-1992) Roux Associates, Huntington, New York. (1989-1990) Triangle Laboratories, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (1988) Professional American Institute of Chemical Engineers Affiliations Tau Beta Pi National Engineering Honor Society Appendix B: Figures Image Provided by ESRI SITE Boundaries of the Property are Approximate. SITE LOCATION MAP 12-000220-01 - Grand Park 46 Market Street Fraser, CO 80442 PREPARED FOR: US Bank PROJ. MGR: Frederick Corn DATE: 02/08/2012 DRAWN BY: Frederick Corn PROJ. #: USB-699 Image Provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Source: USGS Scale: 1" = 1,818' SITE Boundaries of the Property are Approximate. SITE LOCATION MAP 12-000220-01 - Grand Park 46 Market Street Fraser, CO 80442 PREPARED FOR: US Bank PROJ. MGR: Frederick Corn DATE: 02/08/2012 DRAWN BY: Frederick Corn PROJ. #: USB-699 Appendix C: Photographs The Grand Park real estate office and store. Office space at the south end of the building. The General Store at the north end of the building. The General Store gas pumps. Single family homes at Grand Park. Five homes are part of the subject property. The Colorado Adventure Park office at the north end of the subject property. The Colorado Adventure Park tubing hill at the north end of the subject property. The Grand Park maintenance area includes two tent structures. One of the tents is used for storage. The second tent is used as a vehicle maintenance shop. Chemical storage in the vehicle maintenance tent. Oil storage in the vehicle maintenance tent. Used oil storage behind the vehicle maintenance tent. Equipment and fill are stored in the maintenance area. Vacant land on the floor of the Fraser River valley that is part of the subject property. Vacant land higher up the ridge that is part of the subject property. The higher portions of the property were recently cleared of beetle-killed trees. The Union Pacific Railroad crosses the subject property. A shopping center north of the subject property. The Fraser Cemetery is also adjacent to the north end the subject property. Single-family homes southeast of the subject property. A recreation center on Highway 40, along the northeast side of the subject property. A bank along Highway 40, northeast of the subject property. A fire station along Highway 40, northeast of the property. Appendix D: Historical Research Documentation No documents have been associated with this appendix. Appendix E: Regulatory Records Documentation FORM-NULL-AXA tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Grand Park 46 Market Fraser, CO 80442 Inquiry Number: 3250426.1s February 01, 2012 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 7 Orphan Summary 49 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested TC3250426.1s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2012 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 46 MARKET FRASER, CO 80442 COORDINATES 39.9259000 - 39˚ 55’ 33.24’’Latitude (North): 105.8121000 - 105˚ 48’ 43.56’’Longitude (West): Zone 13Universal Tranverse Mercator: 430602.3UTM X (Meters): 4419638.5UTM Y (Meters): 8917 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 39105-H7 FRASER, COTarget Property Map: 1957Most Recent Revision: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 2009Photo Year: USDASource: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 7 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site GENERAL STORE 46 MARKET ST FRASER, CO 80442 N/AUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Sites & Facilities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries AUL Environmental Real Covenants List State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup & Redevelopment Act Application Tracking Report INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory HIST LF Historical Landfill List Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs CDL Meth Lab Locations US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CO ERNS Spills Database Other Ascertainable Records DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 ROD Records Of Decision UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System METHANE SITE Methane Site Investigations - Jefferson County 1980 Methane Investigation Methane Gas & Swamp Findings NPDES Permitted Facility Listing UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing COAL ASH DOE Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Financial Assurance Information Listing EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/19/2011 has revealed that there is 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 CORRACTS site within approximately 2.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PREFERRED CLEANERS 515 ZEREX (FRAZER VALLE N 1 - 2 (1.391 mi.) D16 19 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Health’s Leaking Underground Storage Tank List. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/04/2011 has revealed that there are 7 LUST sites within approximately 2 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MAINTENANCE SHOP 78900 US HWY 40 E 1 - 2 (1.256 mi.) C8 12 Status: Closed BOB PETERSON 78902 US HWY 40 E 1 - 2 (1.257 mi.) C9 12 Status: Closed FRASER MUSTANG SS 213 ZEREX ST N 1 - 2 (1.344 mi.) D10 12 Status: Closed COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF ADMINIS 308 BYERS AVE N 1 - 2 (1.375 mi.) D13 18 Status: Closed CDOT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS 217 BYERS STREET N 1 - 2 (1.385 mi.) F15 18 Status: Closed QUIK STOP #2 300 EISENHOWER N 1 - 2 (1.453 mi.) G20 27 Status: Closed VIKING LODGE & SKI SHOP US HWY 40 & COOPER CREE ESE 1 - 2 (1.596 mi.) I25 29 Status: Closed LUST TRUST: Reimbursement application package. The 1989 Colorado General Assembly established Colorado’s Petroleum Storage Tank Fund. The Fund reimburses eligible applicants for allowable costs incurred in cleaning up petroleum contamination from underground and aboveground petroleum storage tanks, as well as for third-party liability expenses. Remediation of contamination caused by railroad or aircraft fuel is not eligible for reimbursement. The Fund satisfies federal Environmental Protection Agency financial assurance requirements. Monies in the Fund come from various sources, predominantly the state environmental surcharge imposed on all petroleum products except railroad or aircraft fuel. A review of the LUST TRUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/13/2011 has revealed that there is 1 LUST TRUST site within approximately 2 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FRASER MUSTANG SS 213 ZEREX ST N 1 - 2 (1.344 mi.) D11 14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The source is the State Oil Inspector’s Office’s Tank List. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/03/2012 has revealed that there are 5 UST sites within approximately 1.75 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TOWN OF WINTER PARK 78805 US HWY 40 E 1 - 2 (1.239 mi.) B6 10 SOUTHLAND 7 11 NO 22193 78878 US HWY 40 E 1 - 2 (1.252 mi.) C7 10 FRASER MUSTANG SS 213 ZEREX ST N 1 - 2 (1.344 mi.) D10 12 STOP N SAVE #8 78415 HWY 40 E 1 - 2 (1.362 mi.) E12 17 FRASER QUIK STOP 300 EISENHOWER DR N 1 - 2 (1.453 mi.) G19 26 AST: The Aboveground Storage Tank database contains registered ASTs. The source is the State Oil Inspector’s Office’s Tank List. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/03/2012 has revealed that there are 3 AST sites within approximately 1.75 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FRASER VALLEY ACE HARDWARE 425 ZEREX N 1 - 2 (1.493 mi.) G22 28 RITCHIE/ALITA ROGERS 507 ZEREX N 1 - 2 (1.576 mi.) H23 28 GRAND COUNTY EQUIPMENT RENTAL 360 PARK AVE N 1 - 2 (1.645 mi.) 27 48 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY: A listing of registered recycler locations in the state of Colorado. A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/15/2011 has revealed that there is 1 SWRCY site within approximately 2 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF ADMINIS 308 BYERS AVE N 1 - 2 (1.375 mi.) D13 18 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA-NonGen list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/15/2011 has revealed that there is EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 1 RCRA-NonGen site within approximately 1.75 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PREFERRED CLEANERS 515 ZEREX (FRAZER VALLE N 1 - 2 (1.391 mi.) D16 19 MINES: Mines Master Index File. The source of this database is the Dept. of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration. A review of the MINES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/18/2011 has revealed that there is 1 MINES site within approximately 1.75 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MORROW & SONS INC ESE 1 - 2 (1.620 mi.) I26 30 FINDS: The Facility Index System contains both facility information and "pointers" to other sources of information that contain more detail. These include: RCRIS; Permit Compliance System (PCS); Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS); FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] and TSCA Enforcement System, FTTS [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System]; CERCLIS; DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes); Federal Underground Injection Control (FURS); Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS); Surface Impoundments (SIA); TSCA Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS); PADS; RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers); TRIS; and TSCA. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA/NTIS. A review of the FINDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/02/2011 has revealed that there are 8 FINDS sites within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EVERGREEN OIL COMPANY #008 (WI 78415 US HWY 40 ENE 1 - 2 (1.154 mi.) A2 8 REMAX RESORTS 78436 US HWY 40 ENE 1 - 2 (1.160 mi.) A4 9 HI COUNTRY HAUS REALTY 78737 US HWY 40 ENE 1 - 2 (1.231 mi.) B5 9 SOUTHLAND 7 11 NO 22193 78878 US HWY 40 E 1 - 2 (1.252 mi.) C7 10 CLAYTON CONST 256 BYERS AVE N 1 - 2 (1.379 mi.) F14 18 PREFERRED CLEANERS 515 ZEREX (FRAZER VALLE N 1 - 2 (1.391 mi.) D16 19 FRASER TIRE & SERVICE 300 EISENHOWER DRIVE N 1 - 2 (1.453 mi.) G18 26 THE MOUNTAIN PRINTER 218 EISENHOWER DRIVE NNW 1 - 2 (1.460 mi.) G21 27 DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner facilities. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/14/2011 has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 1.75 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PREFERRED CLEANERS 515 ZEREX ST N 1 - 2 (1.583 mi.) H24 29 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 AIRS: A listing of Air Pollution Control Division permits and emissions data. A review of the AIRS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/14/2011 has revealed that there is 1 AIRS site within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EVERGREEN OIL COMPANY #008 (WI 78415 US HWY 40 ENE 1 - 2 (1.154 mi.) A3 8 ASBESTOS: Asbestos abatement and demolition projects by the contractor. A review of the ASBESTOS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/30/2011 has revealed that there is 1 ASBESTOS site within approximately 1.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 100 HIGH COUNTRY DRIVE E 1 - 2 (1.426 mi.) E17 25 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC3250426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 27 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ GRANBY LANDFILL LF,FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 2 THE LIQUOR BARN LUST,UST WINTER PARK HQ LUST EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DIST #4 LUST TRUST,LUST,UST ACTIVE IMAGES LUST TRUST,LUST 7-ELEVEN #22193 LUST,AIRS CDOT WINTER PARK LUST TRUST,UST BLACKWELL OIL CO INC ST ROBERT PETERSEN UST GOLDEN EAGLE CONOCO UST JONES PASS HEADQUARTERS UST STILLWATER MOTEL AST CDOT MAINT FAC IN WINTER PARK AST COLORADO DEPT OF HWYS - GRANBY FINDS,RCRA-NLR DENVER WATER DEPT - WINTER PARK FINDS,RCRA-NLR ARNF/PNG SULPHUR RD FINDS,RCRA-CESQG GRAND COUNTY - GRANBY LANDFILL FINDS TMWS WELL HOUSE 1 AND 2 FINDS,NPDES WINTER PARK FRASER VALLEY CHAMBER FINDS WINTER PARK REAL ESTATE FINDS COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT FINDS GRANDBY SWDS HIST LF EL MONTE MANOR INN ICIS GRAND COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE-PORT CR AIRS GRAND COUNTY - GRANBY LANDFILL AIRS TOWN CENTER NPDES KING MOUNTAIN RANCH LLC NPDES EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 9 1 6 09080 4 0 8 4 4 0 8 4 40 8 6 8 0 860 0 8 4 8 0 84 8 0 8 4 8 0 8 4 8 0 8 4 8 0 9 4 8 0 9 4 4 0 8 7 6 0 9 4 0 0 9 3 609320 9 280 9 2 8 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 40 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 85208520 5 2 0 8 5 2 0 8520 8 5 2 0 8 5 2 8 5 2 08 5 2 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 4 0 8 8 408 7 2 0 9 3 20 8 6 80 8 6 8 0 8 720 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 9 2 8 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 0 0 9 1 60 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 8 5 6 0 8 5 6 08 5 6 0 85608 5 6 0 8 5 6 0 8 5 6 0 8 5 60 8 5 6 0 8 5 6 0 8 5 6 0 8 5 60 8 5 6 08 5 6 0 8 5 6 0 9 1 20 91 2 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 9 0 8 0 9 08 0 9 0 8 0 9 0 8 0 90 4 0 9 0 4 0 9040 9040 9 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 916 8 6 0 0 8 6 00 8 6 0 0 8600 8 6 00 0 0 8 6 0 0 8 6 0 0 8600 8 6 0 0 8 6 00 8 6 0 0 8600 8 6 0 0 8 6 0 0 86 0 0 8 6 0 0 8 6 0 0 8 6 0 0 8 6 0 0 8 6 40 86 4 0 8 6 40 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 8 8 6 4 0 864 0 8 6 40 8 6 4 08640 8 6 4 0 86 4 0 8640 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 8 6 4 0 9 1 6 0 8 680 8 6 8 0 8 6 8 0 8 6 8 0 8 6 8 0 8680 86 8 0 8 6 8 0 8 6 8 0 8680 8 6 8 0 8 6 80 868 0 8680 8 6 8 08680 8 680 8 6 8 0 86 8 0 8 6 8 0 8 6 8 08680 91 2 09 1 2 0 9 0 8 09 0 8 0 8 8 80 8 7 2 0 8 7 2 0 8 720 872 0 87 2 0 8 7 2 0 87208 720 8 7 2 0 8 7 2 0 8 720 8 7 2 0 8720 8 7 2 0 87 2 08720 8720 8 7 2 0 8 7 2 0 8 7 2 0 8 720 9 6 4 0 9 6 0 0 9 5 6 0 9 5 2 0 8 760 8 7 6 0 8 7 6 0 8 7 60 8760 8 760 8760 8 7 6 0 8 7 6 0 8 7 6 0 8760 8 7 6 0 8760 87 6 0 8 7 6 0 8 760 8 7 6 08760 8 760 8 7 608760 8 76 0 8 7 60 956 0 9 5 20 9 4 8 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 89 6 0 8 9 6 0 9 680 8 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 8 800 8 800 8 8 00 88 0 0 88 0 0 8800 8 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 8800 8 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 8800 88 0 0 8800 8 8 0 0 8 8008800 8 8 0 08 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 880 0 88 0 0 8 4 0 8 8 40 8 8 4 0 8 8 4 0 8 8 4 08840 8 8 408840 8 8 40 8840 8 8 4 0 8 8 40 8 8 4 0 88 40 884 0 8 8 4 0 8 8 4 08840 8 8 408840 8 8 4 0 8 8 4 0 8 8 4 0 88408 84 0 9880 912 0 9080 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 80 8 8 8 0 8 8 80 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8880 8 880 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 80 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 80 8 8 808880 8 8 8 0 8 8 80 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8880 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 08 880 9 9 60 9 9 209880 9 560 8920 892 0 8 920 8 9 2 0 8 9 20 8920 8 9 20 8 9 2 0 89 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 20 8 92 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9208 9 20 8 92 0 8 9 2 08920 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8920 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 8 9 2 0 9 8 4 0 9 8 40 9 4 40 9 8 0 0 9 3 6 0 9 7 6 0 9 3 20 896 0 8 9 6 0 8 96089 60 8 9 6 0 8 9 60 8 9 6 0 8 9 6 0 8 960 8 9 6 0 8 9 60 8 9 6 0 89 6 0 8 9 6 0 8 9 6 08 9 6 0 8960 8 9 6 0 8 9 6 0 8960 8 9 6 0 8 9 6 0 8 9 608960 8 96 0 8 9 6 0 8 9 6 0 8 9 6 0 9 6 8 0 98 4 0 9 8 0 0 9 8 0 0 9 8 0 0 98 0 0 9 7 60 9 7 60 9 7 6 0 97 6 0 90 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 000 9 0 00 9 0 00 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 90 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9000 9 0 0 0 90 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 00 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 09 000 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 90 0 0 90 00 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 90 0 0 97 20 9 720 9 7 2 0 97209520 968 0 9 68 0 9 6 80 968 0 9480 96409640 9 6 4 0 9 640 9 6009600 9 6 0 0 9 6 00 9600 9 5609560 9 5 6 0 9560 9 5 2 0 9 5 2 0 9 5 20 9520 9 4 8 09480 9 4 8 0 9 4 8 0 9480 9 4 4 0 9 440 94 4 0 9 4 4 0 9440 9 0 4 0 9 040 9 0 4 0 9 040 9 0 4 0 9 0 4 0 9 040 9 040 9 040 9 0 4 0 9040 9040 9 0 4 0 904090409040 9 0 4 0 9 0 40 90 4 0 904 0 904 0 9 0 4 0 9 0 4 0 9 0 4 0 9 0 40 10 000 9 9 6 0 9 880 9 9 2 0 9 8 8 09880 9 0 8 0 90 8 0 9 0 8 0 9 080 9 0 8 0 908 0 9080 9 0 80 9080 9 0 8 0 9 080 9 080 9 080 9 0 80 9 080 9 0 80 9 0 8 0 90 8 0 9 0 8 0 9 0 8 0 90 8 09080 9 0 80 9 0 80 9 72 0 9840 98 4 0 9 4 8 0 9 4 4 08 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9400 9 4 00 9 4 00 9400 9 4 0 0 93 6 0 9 3 609 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 9 360 9 3 60 9 360 9 3 6 0 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 93209320 9 3 20 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 9320 9 3 2 0 9 2 80 9 2 8 0 9 280 92 8 0 9 280 92 8 0 9 280 9280 9 2 8 0 9 1 20 9120 9 1 2 0 91 2 09 1 2 0 9 120 9 1 2 0 9120 9120 9 1 2 0 9120 9 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 91209120 9 120 9 1 20 9 1 2 0 9 1 2 09 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 9 120 9 1 2 0 9 1 2 0 9 1 20 1 0120 10 0 80 9 1 60 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 160 9 1 6 0 91 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 60 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 916 0 9 160 9 1 6 0 9160 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 6 0 9 1 60 9 2 00 9 2 0 0 9 2 00 9 2 00 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 200 9200 9 2 0 09 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2 00 92 0 09200 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2 0 0 9 2009200 9 2 0 0 9 2 00 2 00 9 2 40 9 2 4 0 9 2 40 9 2 4 0 9240 92 40 9240 9240 92409 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 92 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 24 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 4 0 9 2 40 9 24 0 9 2 4 0 92 40240 9 28 9 2 80 9 2 8 0 9 2 8 0 9 2 8 0 9 2 8 0 9 2 80 9 2 8 0 92 80 9 280 9 2 8 0 9 28 0 9 2 8 0 9 2 8 0 9 2 8 0 9 280 9280 9 280 9 28 0 9 2 80 9 3 20 8 0 020801 0 64 1 060 105 6 060105 2 1 0 5 2 0 10480 1 0 4 8 0 0 1044 1 04 4 0 440 4 0 10400 1 0 4 00 04 00 00 10360 1 0 36 0 103 6 0 1 03 6 00320 1 0 3 20 1 0 320 10320 8 0 1 0 2 80 1 02 8 0 10280280 4 0 1 0 2 40 1 0 2 4 0 10240240 00 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 102000200 1 0 1 60 1 0 1 6 0 1 0160 101600 1 6 0 1 0 1 20 1 0 1 20 1 0 1 20 1 0120 01 2 0 8 0 1 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 8 0 100 80 1 0 08 0 10080 0 0 4 010040 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 40 010000 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 9 9 60 9 9 6 0 9 9 6 0 9 9 6 0 9 9 6 09 9 6 0 9 9 6 0 9 960 9 9 2 0 9 9 2 0 9 9 2 0 9 9 2 0 9 9 2 0 9 9 20 9 9 2 0 99 20 9 8 8 09880 9 8 80 9 8 80 9 8 8 09880 9880 98 80 9 8 4 0 9 8 4 0 9 8409 8 40 9 8 4 09840 9 8 4 0 9 8 40984 0 9 8 0 09800 98 0 0 9 800 9 8 0 09800 9 8 0 0 9 8009800 9 7 60 9760 976 0 9 7 6 0 9 7 6 09 7 6 0 9 7 6097609 7 60 9 7 2 0 9 720 9 7 2 0 9 720 9 7 2 0 9 7 2 0 9 7 2 0 9 7 20 97 20 9 7 2 0 9 6 8 0 9680 9 6 80 9 6 8 0 9 6 8 09680 9 6 8 0 9 680 9 6 8 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 640 96 4 0 9 6 0 0 9 600 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 00 9 6 0 0 9 6009 6 0 0 9 5 6 0 956 09560 9 5 6 0 9 5 6 0 9 5 6 0 9560 9 5 6 0 9 5 6 0 9 5 60 9 5 2 0 9 5 2 0 9 520 9 520 9 5 2 0 9 5 2 0 95 20 9 5 209520 9 5 2 0 9 5 20 9 4 8 0 9 480 9480 94 8 0 9 4 80 9 4 8 0 9 4 8 0 9 4 8 0 9 4 8 09 4 8 0 9480 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9440 9440 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 94 40 9 440 9 4 0 0 9 40 0 9 4 00 94 0 0 9 40 0 9 4 00 9 4 0 0 94 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 00 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 3 6 0 9 360 9 3 60 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 9 3 60 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 093 6 0 9 3 6 0 01104 0 0 1 000 960 0360320102801024 01020 01016 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 80 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 40 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 9 9 6 0 9 9 6 0 9 9 6 00 9 9 2 0 9 9 2 09 9 2 0 2 0 9 9 20 0 8 8 0 9 8 8 0 9 8 8 0 88 0 9880 8 0 40 9 8 4 0 9 8 4 0 9 8 4 09840 9840 9 8 40 8 0 0 9 8 0 0 9 8 0 0 9 8 0 09 8 0 0 9800 98009800 0 0 7 6 0 9 7 6 0 9 76 0 9 7 6 0 9 7 6 0 97 6 0 9 760 9 7 6 0 7 2 0 9 7 2 0 9 7 20 9720 9 720 9 7 2 0 9 7 2 0 9 7 2 0 6 8 0 9 6 8 0 9 6 8 0 9 6 80 96 809680 9 6 8 0 0 9 6 4 9 6 4 0 9 6 409640 96 40 9 6 40 9 6 4 0 9 6 4 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 6 0 0 9 5 6 0 9 5 6 0 9 5 6 0 9 5 6 0 95 6 0 9 5 609560 9 5 6 0 9 5 2 0 9 5 2 0 9 520 9 5 2 0 95 2 0 9 5 2 09520 9 5 2 0 9 4 8 0 9 4 8 0 9 4 80 9 4 80 9 4 8 0 9 4 8 0 9 480 4 80 9 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 0 9 4 4 09440 9 4 4 0 0 9 4 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 00 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 4 0 0 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 93 60 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 9 3 6 0 9 3 60 9 3 60 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 9 32 0 93 2 0 9 3 2 0 9 3 20 9 320 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 09320 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 9 3 2 0 9 3 20 9 3 2 0 93 2 0 9320 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 88 8 0 8920 8920 89 6 0 8960 9000 90 4 0 9080 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500NPL 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500Proposed NPL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000CERCLIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000CERC-NFRAP Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1 1 0 0 0 0 2.500CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.750RCRA-LQG 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.750RCRA-SQG 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.750RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000US ENG CONTROLS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ASHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 7 7 0 0 0 0 2.000LUST 1 1 0 0 0 0 2.000LUST TRUST 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000LAST 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 5 5 0 0 0 0 1.750 XUST TC3250426.1s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 3 3 0 0 0 0 1.750AST 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.750INDIAN UST 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.750FEMA UST State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000AUL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000VCP 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000INDIAN VCP ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000DEBRIS REGION 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000ODI 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000HIST LF 1 1 0 0 0 0 2.000SWRCY Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500US CDL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500CDL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500US HIST CDL Local Land Records 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500LIENS 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000LUCIS Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500HMIRS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500CO ERNS Other Ascertainable Records 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.750RCRA-NonGen 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500DOT OPS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500DOD 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500FUDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500CONSENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500ROD 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000UMTRA 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.750MINES 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500TRIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500TSCA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500FTTS TC3250426.1s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500HIST FTTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500SSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500ICIS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500PADS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500MLTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500RADINFO 8 8 0 0 0 0 1.500FINDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500RAATS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500METHANE SITE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500Methane Investigation 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.750DRYCLEANERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500NPDES 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.500AIRS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000UMTRA 1 1 0 0 0 0 1.500ASBESTOS 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500INDIAN RESERV 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500COAL ASH DOE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500PCB TRANSFORMER 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.000COAL ASH EPA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.500FINANCIAL ASSURANCE EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.500Manufactured Gas Plants NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database N/A = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list. TC3250426.1s Page 6 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation USTTank Type: E-85Tank Chemical: 18009-5Tank Tag: 3.19555060882801Tank Age: 10/24/2008Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Premium (PUL)Tank Chemical: 18009-4Tank Tag: 3.19555060882801Tank Age: 10/24/2008Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Unleaded Regular (RUL)Tank Chemical: 18009-3Tank Tag: 3.19555060882801Tank Age: 10/24/2008Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Diesel - Dyed #2Tank Chemical: 18009-2Tank Tag: 3.19555060882801Tank Age: 10/24/2008Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Diesel - Dyed #2Tank Chemical: 18009-1Tank Tag: 3.19555060882801Tank Age: 10/24/2008Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: 80482Owner Zip: GRANDOwner County: COOwner State: WINTER PARKOwner City: PO Box 30Owner Address: GRAND PARK DEVELOPEMENTOwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: GRAND PARK DEVELOPEMENTLast Name: 20466Owner Id: Owner: 18009Facility ID: CO UST: Actual: 8917 ft. Property FRASER, CO 80442 Target 46 MARKET ST N/A 1 USTGENERAL STORE U004154369 TC3250426.1s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information of the Clean Air Act. redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Environmental Interest/Information System 110002435623Registry ID: FINDS: 6096 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster A 1.154 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8683 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 ENE 78415 US HWY 40 N/A A2 FINDSEVERGREEN OIL COMPANY #008 (WINTER PK) 1004445730 Not reportedConstruction Permit Number: 001Unique Emmission Unit ID: 447110NAICS Primary: 5541SIC Primary: 1054714.02Longitude: 395528.95Latitude: (303)674-7497Contact Phone: ANDY SMITH JR.Contact Person: 049-0025County/Plant ID: Tons Per YearSite-wide Estimated Emissions Units: 0.0497050Site-wide Estimated Emissions: BENZENEFull Pollutant Name: 3 UNDRGRND GASOLINE TANKSEmission Unit Description: Not reportedConstruction Permit Number: 001Unique Emmission Unit ID: 447110NAICS Primary: 5541SIC Primary: 1054714.02Longitude: 395528.95Latitude: (303)674-7497Contact Phone: ANDY SMITH JR.Contact Person: 049-0025County/Plant ID: CO AIRS: 6096 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster A 1.154 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8683 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 ENE 78415 US HWY 40 N/A A3 AIRSEVERGREEN OIL COMPANY #008 (WINTER PK) S108121268 TC3250426.1s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Tons Per YearSite-wide Estimated Emissions Units: 6.3072330Site-wide Estimated Emissions: VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDSFull Pollutant Name: 3 UNDRGRND GASOLINE TANKSEmission Unit Description: EVERGREEN OIL COMPANY #008 (WINTER PK) (Continued) S108121268 Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated Environmental Interest/Information System 110012353826Registry ID: FINDS: 6124 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster A 1.160 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8685 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 ENE 78436 US HWY 40 N/A A4 FINDSREMAX RESORTS 1005826664 that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated Environmental Interest/Information System 110012364565Registry ID: FINDS: 6497 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B 1.231 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8699 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 ENE 78737 US HWY 40 N/A B5 FINDSHI COUNTRY HAUS REALTY 1006301418 TC3250426.1s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. HI COUNTRY HAUS REALTY (Continued) 1006301418 USTTank Type: DieselTank Chemical: 10668-2Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: DieselTank Chemical: 10668-1Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: 80482Owner Zip: GRANDOwner County: COOwner State: WINTER PARKOwner City: PO BOX 3327Owner Address: TOWN OF WINTER PARKOwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: TOWN OF WINTER PARKLast Name: 1860Owner Id: Owner: 10668Facility ID: CO UST: 6543 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B 1.239 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8705 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 East 78805 US HWY 40 N/A B6 USTTOWN OF WINTER PARK U003123117 used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Environmental Interest/Information System 110002435632Registry ID: FINDS: 6608 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster C 1.252 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8715 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 East UST78878 US HWY 40 N/A C7 FINDSSOUTHLAND 7 11 NO 22193 1004446437 TC3250426.1s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation USTTank Type: Gasoline - Premium (PUL)Tank Chemical: 9135-3Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: 04/16/1981Date Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Mid-Grade (MUL)Tank Chemical: 9135-2Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: 04/16/1981Date Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Unleaded Regular (RUL)Tank Chemical: 9135-1Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: 04/16/1981Date Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: 75221Owner Zip: DALLASOwner County: TXOwner State: DALLASOwner City: PO BOX 711Owner Address: 7-ELEVEN INCOwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: 7-ELEVEN INCLast Name: 5230Owner Id: Owner: 9135Facility ID: CO UST: CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information of the Clean Air Act. redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans SOUTHLAND 7 11 NO 22193 (Continued) 1004446437 TC3250426.1s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992-10-15 00:00:00Log Date: 1992-08-31 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 318Event ID: 12163Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: 6632 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster C 1.256 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8719 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 East 78900 US HWY 40 N/A C8 LUSTMAINTENANCE SHOP S102720236 1990-11-20 00:00:00Log Date: 1990-11-20 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 706Event ID: 5820Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: 6639 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster C 1.257 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8720 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 East 78902 US HWY 40 N/A C9 LUSTBOB PETERSON S102051798 80442Owner Zip: GRANDOwner County: COOwner State: FRASEROwner City: 213 ZEREX STOwner Address: GERARD E DESROSIERSOwner: EMiddle Init: GERARDFirst Name: DESROSIERSLast Name: 2538Owner Id: Owner: 176Facility ID: CO UST: 1996-05-28 00:00:00Log Date: 1996-05-28 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 1596Event ID: 176Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: 7094 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster D 1.344 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8560 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North UST213 ZEREX ST N/A D10 LUSTFRASER MUSTANG SS U004007525 TC3250426.1s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation USTTank Type: UnknownTank Chemical: 176-7Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: UnknownTank Chemical: 176-6Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: UnknownTank Chemical: 176-5Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: UnknownTank Chemical: 176-4Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: GasolineTank Chemical: 176-3Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: 05/09/1971Date Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: GasolineTank Chemical: 176-2Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: 05/09/1971Date Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: USTTank Type: GasolineTank Chemical: 176-1Tank Tag: Not reportedTank Age: 05/09/1971Date Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: FRASER MUSTANG SS (Continued)U004007525 TC3250426.1s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2773RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: (303) 318-8506Fund Analyst Phone: (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Bev SnodgrassFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: 77-111Protest Number: 5/21/1998Pay Voucher Date: 5/11/1998FPR Date: $54,720.92Net Reimbursement: $95,529.01Total Reimbursement: 8/12/1997Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: SupplementalRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: N.A.Commissioned Date: 2155RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: (303) 318-8513Fund Analyst Phone: (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Cindee Garner-FloroFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: Not reportedProtest Number: 9/3/1997Pay Voucher Date: 8/8/1997FPR Date: $49,149.84Net Reimbursement: $49,149.84Total Reimbursement: 9/4/1996Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: OriginalRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: 8/8/1997Commissioned Date: 1605RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: CO LUST TRUST: 7094 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster D 1.344 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8560 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 213 ZEREX ST N/A D11 LUST TRUSTFRASER MUSTANG SS U003123350 TC3250426.1s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation $23,678.73Total Reimbursement: 3/17/2000Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: SupplementalRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: N.A.Commissioned Date: 4008RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: (303) 318-8506Fund Analyst Phone: (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Bev SnodgrassFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: Not reportedProtest Number: 7/21/1999Pay Voucher Date: 7/7/1999FPR Date: $33,185.99Net Reimbursement: $33,641.65Total Reimbursement: 2/5/1999Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: SupplementalRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: N.A.Commissioned Date: 3164RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: (303) 318-8514Fund Analyst Phone: (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Carolyn SkaggsFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: 77-119Protest Number: 12/30/1998Pay Voucher Date: 12/4/1998FPR Date: $134,889.70Net Reimbursement: $138,265.27Total Reimbursement: 7/16/1998Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: SupplementalRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: 12/4/1998Commissioned Date: FRASER MUSTANG SS (Continued)U003123350 TC3250426.1s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Bev SnodgrassFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: Not reportedProtest Number: Not reportedPay Voucher Date: Not reportedFPR Date: $24,769.20Net Reimbursement: $27,521.33Total Reimbursement: 5/1/2001Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: LUST TrustRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: N.A.Commissioned Date: 8452RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: (303) 318-8510Fund Analyst Phone: (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Susan DeMeulesFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: Not reportedProtest Number: 5/31/2001Pay Voucher Date: 5/11/2001FPR Date: $8,592.50Net Reimbursement: $8,617.50Total Reimbursement: 2/28/2001Rap Filed Date: ApprovedRap Status: SupplementalRap Type Description: $355,819.17Total Reimbursement for Event: 0.0Total Percent Reduction: LenderEligibility Type Description: Not reportedCap Status: N.A.Commissioned Date: 4910RAP ID: 1596Event ID: Town of FraserPayee Name: 176Facility ID: (303) 318-8511Fund Analyst Phone: (303) 318-8537Technical Reviewer Phone: Larry DelinTechnical Reviewer: OtherCategory: Joy ShulmanFund Analyst: Not reportedSpecial Conditions: Not reportedProtest Number: 6/7/2000Pay Voucher Date: 5/22/2000FPR Date: $23,675.21Net Reimbursement: FRASER MUSTANG SS (Continued)U003123350 TC3250426.1s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (303) 318-8506Fund Analyst Phone: FRASER MUSTANG SS (Continued)U003123350 USTTank Type: DieselTank Chemical: 10208-3Tank Tag: 23.9078793759513Tank Age: 02/12/1988Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Premium (PUL)Tank Chemical: 10208-2Tank Tag: 23.9078793759513Tank Age: 02/12/1988Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Unleaded Regular (RUL)Tank Chemical: 10208-1Tank Tag: 23.9078793759513Tank Age: 02/12/1988Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: 80439Owner Zip: JEFFERSONOwner County: COOwner State: EVERGREENOwner City: 1202 BERGEN PKWY STE 303Owner Address: EVERGREEN OIL COMPANYOwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: EVERGREEN OIL COMPANYLast Name: 4663Owner Id: Owner: 10208Facility ID: CO UST: 7191 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E 1.362 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8743 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 East 78415 HWY 40 N/A E12 USTSTOP N SAVE #8 U003718643 TC3250426.1s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1993-12-09 00:00:00Log Date: 1993-12-09 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 480Event ID: 13139Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: khaynes@co.grand.co.usFacility Email: 970 887 3168Address Phone Number: Hot Sulphur Springs, CO 80451Mailing City/State/Zip: PO Box 1648Mailing Street: Ken HaynesContact Name: Not reportedDate of Registration: SWRCY: 7262 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster D 1.375 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8568 ft. > 1 HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO 80451 North LUST308 BYERS AVE N/A D13 SWRCYCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION S103852890 of the Clean Air Act. redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Environmental Interest/Information System 110038648247Registry ID: FINDS: 7281 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster F 1.379 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8572 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 256 BYERS AVE N/A F14 FINDSCLAYTON CONST 1012079642 1989-10-03 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 1373Event ID: 7288Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: 7311 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster F 1.385 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8574 ft. > 1 HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS, CO 80451 North 217 BYERS STREET N/A F15 LUSTCDOT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS S105567800 TC3250426.1s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1995-06-23 00:00:00Log Date: CDOT HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS (Continued) S105567800 81232NAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075LO - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a lowAction: 07/12/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA450 - Corrective Measures Design ApprovedAction: 07/12/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA100 - RFI ImpositionAction: 07/11/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA406Action: 07/11/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA060 - Notice of ContaminationAction: 07/11/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: CORRACTS: 7347 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster D 1.391 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8567 ft. > 1 FINDSFRASER, CO 80442 North RCRA-NonGen515 ZEREX (FRAZER VALLEY CENTER) COD981547987 D16 CORRACTSPREFERRED CLEANERS 1000228284 TC3250426.1s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA550RCAction: 10/03/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA150 - RFI Workplan ApprovedAction: 07/12/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA110 - RFI Workplan ReceivedAction: 07/12/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA070YE - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is NecessaryAction: 07/12/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA500 - CMI Workplan ApprovedAction: 07/12/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) PREFERRED CLEANERS (Continued) 1000228284 TC3250426.1s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FRASER, CO 80442 S ZEREXOwner/operator address: PREFFERED CLEANERSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 08EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (970) 726-4567Contact telephone: USContact country: FRASER, CO 80442 P O BOX 753Contact address: JOHN TINNINContact: FRASER, CO 80442 P O BOX 753Mailing address: COD981547987EPA ID: FRASER, CO 80442 515 S ZEREXFacility address: PREFERRED CLEANERSFacility name: 04/25/2005Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified CA750YE - Migration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes,Action: 10/13/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): Exposures Under Control has been verified CA725YE - Current Human Exposures Under Control, Yes, Current HumanAction: 10/13/2006Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 08EPA Region: COD981547987EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated) 81232NAICS Code(s): CA999NF - Corrective Action Process Terminated, No Further ActionAction: 10/13/2006Actual Date: PREFERRED CLEANERS (Continued) 1000228284 TC3250426.1s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,Waste name: F002Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Hazardous Waste Summary: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PREFERRED CLEANERSFacility name: 02/11/1994Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PREFERRED CLEANERSFacility name: 10/31/2000Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PREFERRED CLEANERSFacility name: 12/30/2003Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/0001Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (970) 726-4567Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: FRASER, CO 80442 P O BOX 753Owner/operator address: JOHN TINNINOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/30/2003Owner/Op start date: PREFERRED CLEANERS (Continued) 1000228284 TC3250426.1s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Corrective Measures Design ApprovedEvent: 07/12/2006Event date: CMI Workplan ApprovedEvent: 07/12/2006Event date: RFI Workplan ApprovedEvent: 07/12/2006Event date: RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Necessary;Event: 07/12/2006Event date: action priority. CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a low correctiveEvent: 07/12/2006Event date: RFI Workplan ReceivedEvent: 07/12/2006Event date: Notice of ContaminationEvent: 07/11/2006Event date: RFI ImpositionEvent: 07/11/2006Event date: CA406Event: 07/11/2006Event date: Corrective Action Summary: METHANOL (I)Waste name: U154Waste code: HYDROFLUORIC ACID (C,T)Waste name: U134Waste code: ACETONE (I)Waste name: U002Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, PREFERRED CLEANERS (Continued) 1000228284 TC3250426.1s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Environmental Interest/Information System 110002444604Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 04/22/2005Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONEvaluation: 07/12/2006Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONEvaluation: 10/13/2006Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Corrective Action Process Terminated, No Further ActionEvent: 10/13/2006Event date: changes at the facility. re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of significant reasonably expected conditions. This determination will be expected to be under control at the facility under current and contained in the EI determination, current human exposures are Under Control has been verified. Based on a review of information Current Human Exposures under Control, Yes, Current Human ExposuresEvent: 10/13/2006Event date: significant changes at the facility. determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency becomes aware of remains within the existing area of contaminated groundwater. This monitoring will be conducted to confirm that contaminated groundwater migration of contaminated groundwater is under control, and that at the facility. Specifically, this determination indicates that the determined that migration of contaminated groundwater is under control review of information contained in the EI determination, it has been Contaminated Groundwater Under Control has been verified. Based on a Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control, Yes, Migration ofEvent: 10/13/2006Event date: CA550RCEvent: 10/03/2006Event date: PREFERRED CLEANERS (Continued) 1000228284 TC3250426.1s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource read-only. their facility locations and allows users to view this information web-based database that allows environmental program managers to edit Colorado’s Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE)’s their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information of the Clean Air Act. redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is PREFERRED CLEANERS (Continued) 1000228284 Not reportedBegin Date: Not reportedEnd Date: Not reportedDrums: Not reportedNotice Date: Not reportedDemo Number: Asbestos Abatement ProjectsProject Type: 2004Year: 2700Square Ft: Not reportedLinear Ft: 30Project: 11/17/2004Permit Date: Diamond Hills ServicesContractor: 04SU3736APermit Number: CO ASBESTOS: 7528 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 1.426 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8735 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO East 100 HIGH COUNTRY DRIVE N/A E17 ASBESTOS S107762552 TC3250426.1s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated Environmental Interest/Information System 110040058246Registry ID: FINDS: 7674 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster G 1.453 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8573 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 300 EISENHOWER DRIVE N/A G18 FINDSFRASER TIRE & SERVICE 1012278485 38.2832218417047Tank Age: 10/01/1973Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Gasoline - Unleaded Regular (RUL)Tank Chemical: 2548-1Tank Tag: 31.2804821156773Tank Age: 09/30/1980Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: 80442Owner Zip: GRANDOwner County: COOwner State: FRASEROwner City: PO Box 603Owner Address: Fraser Quick Stop LLCOwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: Fraser Quick Stop LLCLast Name: 7554Owner Id: Owner: 2548Facility ID: CO UST: 7674 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster G 1.453 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8573 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 300 EISENHOWER DR N/A G19 USTFRASER QUIK STOP U003123949 TC3250426.1s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation USTTank Type: Gasoline - Premium (PUL)Tank Chemical: 2548-4Tank Tag: 23.2750026636225Tank Age: 09/30/1988Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: Diesel - Dyed #1Tank Chemical: 2548-3Tank Tag: 38.2832218417047Tank Age: 10/01/1973Date Tank Installed: Currently In UseTank Status: USTTank Type: DieselTank Chemical: 2548-2Tank Tag: FRASER QUIK STOP (Continued)U003123949 1994-09-02 00:00:00Log Date: 1994-11-07 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 2908Event ID: 12548Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: 7674 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster G 1.453 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8573 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 300 EISENHOWER N/A G20 LUSTQUIK STOP #2 S102720222 of the Clean Air Act. redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Environmental Interest/Information System 110007076706Registry ID: FINDS: 7711 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster G 1.460 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8574 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 NNW 218 EISENHOWER DRIVE N/A G21 FINDSTHE MOUNTAIN PRINTER 1004449843 TC3250426.1s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information THE MOUNTAIN PRINTER (Continued) 1004449843 80202Owner Zip: DENVEROwner County: COOwner State: DENVEROwner City: DIVISION OF OIL & PUBLIC SAFETYOwner Address: LPG UNKNOWN OWNEROwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: LPG UNKNOWN OWNERLast Name: 19523Owner Id: Owner: LPGTank Type: LPGTank Contents: 16748-1Tank Tag: 19523Owner ID: 16748Facility ID: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: AST: 7885 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster G 1.493 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8568 ft. > 1 GRANBY, CO 80446 North 425 ZEREX N/A G22 ASTFRASER VALLEY ACE HARDWARE A100288716 LPG UNKNOWN OWNEROwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: LPG UNKNOWN OWNERLast Name: 19523Owner Id: Owner: LPGTank Type: LPGTank Contents: 17020-1Tank Tag: 19523Owner ID: 17020Facility ID: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: AST: 8321 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster H 1.576 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8557 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 507 ZEREX N/A H23 ASTRITCHIE/ALITA ROGERS A100288826 TC3250426.1s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 80202Owner Zip: DENVEROwner County: COOwner State: DENVEROwner City: DIVISION OF OIL & PUBLIC SAFETYOwner Address: RITCHIE/ALITA ROGERS (Continued) A100288826 057D4918Serial # Of Equipment: BT35Equipment Model: FLOURMATIC DRY TO DRYEquipment Manufacturer: FLOURMATIC SN:05704.CNEmission Unit Desc: 01Emission Process Id: 001Emission Unit Id: GALLONS SOLVENT CONSUMEDAnnual Throughput Units: 0Annual Throughput: FLOURMATIC MD:BT35 SN:05704918Emission Process Desc: 93GR1508.CNConstruction Permit Num: (970)726-4567Site Owner Phone: FRASER, 08 80442Site Owner Mail City/Zip: PO BOX 753Site Owner Mail Addr: JOHN TINNINSite Owner Name: 4422.3379999999997Site UTM Vert: 430.19600000000003Site UTM Horiz: 13Site UTM Zone: 1054901.73Site Longitude: 395653.85999999999Site Latitude: ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATORContact Person: 049-0030Facility Id: DRYCLEANERS: 8359 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster H 1.583 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8556 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80446 North 515 ZEREX ST N/A H24 DRYCLEANERSPREFERRED CLEANERS S106452905 1991-11-15 00:00:00Log Date: 1991-11-15 00:00:00Confirmed Release: 3133Event ID: 12551Facility Id: ClosedStatus: Not reportedFacility Name 2: LUST: 8425 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster I 1.596 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8798 ft. > 1 WINTER PARK, CO 80482 ESE US HWY 40 & COOPER CREEK WAY N/A I25 LUSTVIKING LODGE & SKI SHOP S102053083 TC3250426.1s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 05/23/2002Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6296981Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2002Year: 55.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 55.00Paid Penalty: 55.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 05/23/2002Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 05/23/2002Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6296980Violation Number: Violations Details: 105 47 00Longitude: 39 55 05Latitude: 0Number of plants: 0Number of shops: non-Coal MiningOperation Class: 20000608Status date: 1Status: 049County FIPS code: 08State FIPS code: MORROW & SONS INCCompany: GREY GOOSEEntity name: 14410 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000SIC code(s): 0503869Mine ID: MINES: 8555 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster I 1.620 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8791 ft. > 1 GRAND (County), CO ESE N/A I26 MINESMORROW & SONS INC 1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 09/30/2003Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6297835Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2003Year: 60Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60Paid Penalty: 60Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/04/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 09/30/2003Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6297834Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2002Year: 55.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 55.00Paid Penalty: 55.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 09/30/2002Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CitationCitation/Order: 11/08/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312007Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2003Year: 214Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 214Paid Penalty: 214Proposed Penalty: YSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 09/30/2003Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 09/30/2003Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6297836Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2003Year: 217Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 217Paid Penalty: 217Proposed Penalty: YSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/04/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/08/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312009Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/08/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312008Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/08/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312011Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 203.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 203.00Paid Penalty: 203.00Proposed Penalty: YSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/08/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312010Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 07/29/2005Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312014Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 11/08/2004Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312012Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6589892Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: PrintedAssessment Status code: 0.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 09/15/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 09/14/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6589891Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2004Year: 60.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 60.00Paid Penalty: 60.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 07/29/2005Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 11/04/2004Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6312015Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MineLocationAddress Type: 09/14/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6589894Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: PrintedAssessment Status code: 0.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 09/15/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 09/14/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6589893Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: PrintedAssessment Status code: 0.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 09/15/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 09/14/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 02/09/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6590047Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 02/10/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 02/09/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6590046Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: PrintedAssessment Status code: 0.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 09/15/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/30/2009Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6316025Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 02/14/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 02/09/2011Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6590048Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2011Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 02/14/2011Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/30/2009Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6316027Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2009Year: 127.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 127.00Paid Penalty: 127.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 07/01/2009Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/30/2009Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6316026Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2009Year: 1,579.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 1,579.00Paid Penalty: 2,106.00Proposed Penalty: YSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 07/08/2009Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CitationCitation/Order: 06/09/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/09/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445476Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2009Year: 127.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 127.00Paid Penalty: 127.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/30/2009Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/30/2009Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6316028Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2009Year: 1,579.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 1,579.00Paid Penalty: 2,106.00Proposed Penalty: YSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 07/01/2009Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/10/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/09/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445478Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/09/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/09/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445477Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/10/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/09/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445480Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/10/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/09/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445479Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/10/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/10/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445482Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/10/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/09/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445481Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6445485Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: YSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 06/10/2008Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/10/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445484Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 112.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 112.00Paid Penalty: 112.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: Not reportedDate Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/10/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445483Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MineLocationAddress Type: 07/03/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445500Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: Not reportedAssessment Amount: Not reportedAssess. Case Status code: Not reportedAssessment Status code: Not reportedPaid Penalty: Not reportedProposed Penalty: Not reportedSig and Sub Designation: OrderCitation/Order: 07/03/2008Date Abated: 104(b)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 07/03/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6445499Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: 112.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 112.00Paid Penalty: 112.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: Not reportedDate Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 06/10/2008Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2010Year: 100.00Assessment Amount: ProposedAssess. Case Status code: ClosedAssessment Status code: 100.00Paid Penalty: 100.00Proposed Penalty: NSig and Sub Designation: CitationCitation/Order: 01/13/2010Date Abated: 104(a)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MineLocationAddress Type: 01/13/2010Date Issued: Grey GooseMine Name: 6447318Violation Number: Not reportedP.O. Box: GrandCounty Name: Fraser, CO 80442 2008Year: Not reportedAssessment Amount: Not reportedAssess. Case Status code: Not reportedAssessment Status code: Not reportedPaid Penalty: Not reportedProposed Penalty: Not reportedSig and Sub Designation: OrderCitation/Order: 07/03/2008Date Abated: 104(b)Action Type: 06/08/2000Status Date: ActiveMine Status: SurfaceMine Type: 06/01/1983Ownership Date: Construction Sand and GravelMined Material: Robert L MorrowController Name: Not reportedContractor ID: Morrow & Sons IncOperator: 2270 1/2 Cty Rd 50Address: MORROW & SONS INC (Continued)1011134932 TC3250426.1s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 80442Owner Zip: GRANDOwner County: COOwner State: FRASEROwner City: 360 PARK AVEOwner Address: GRAND COUNTY EQUIPMENT RENTALOwner: Not reportedMiddle Init: Not reportedFirst Name: GRAND COUNTY EQUIPMENT RENTALLast Name: 19710Owner Id: Owner: LPGTank Type: LPGTank Contents: 16439-1Tank Tag: 19710Owner ID: 16439Facility ID: Not reportedTank Age: Not reportedDate Tank Installed: Permanently ClosedTank Status: AST: 8688 ft. 1.645 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 8542 ft. > 1 FRASER, CO 80442 North 360 PARK AVE N/A 27 ASTGRAND COUNTY EQUIPMENT RENTAL A100288638 TC3250426.1s Page 48 ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) Count: 27 records. GRANBY 1004678768 ARNF/PNG SULPHUR RD 62429 HWY 40 80446 FINDS,RCRA-CESQG GRANBY 1004679337 COLORADO DEPT OF HWYS - GRANBY HWY 40 MP 212.45 80446 FINDS,RCRA-NLR WINTER PARK 1004679530 DENVER WATER DEPT - WINTER PARK CO STATE HWY 40 (SEE MAPS)80482 FINDS,RCRA-NLR WINTER PARK 1006300179 WINTER PARK REAL ESTATE 78967 US HWY 80482 FINDS WINTER PARK 1006870524 WINTER PARK FRASER VALLEY CHAMBER 78841 U.S. HIGHWAY 40 80482 FINDS TABERNASH 1010690776 TMWS WELL HOUSE 1 AND 2 HIGHWAY 40 & PRAIRIE SAGE ROAD 80478 FINDS,NPDES GRANBY 1011586399 EL MONTE MANOR INN HWY 40 GRANBY CO 80446 80446 ICIS GRANBY, 2.2 MI NW OF 1012216949 GRAND COUNTY - GRANBY LANDFILL US HIGHWAY 40 AT STATE HWY 125 80446 FINDS WINTER PARK 1012296380 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAT STATE HIGHWAY 40 80482 FINDS WINTER PARK A100106940 CDOT MAINT FAC IN WINTER PARK US HWY 40 MP 233.05 80482 AST GRANBY A100289231 STILLWATER MOTEL HWY 34 80446 AST GRANBY S100698403 GRANBY LANDFILL HWY 125 AT US 40 80446 LF,FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 2 S100795925 GRANDBY SWDS HWY 125 &40 HIST LF WINTER PARK S102719245 ACTIVE IMAGES 78885 HWY 40 80482 LUST TRUST,LUST WINTER PARK S108127207 7-ELEVEN #22193 78878 HWY 40 80482 LUST,AIRS FRASER S109509654 TOWN CENTER FIRST STREET & HIGHWAY 40 00000 NPDES GRANBY S110128448 KING MOUNTAIN RANCH LLC 11845 HIGHWAY 125 80446 NPDES GRANBY, 2.2 MI NW OF S110341070 GRAND COUNTY - GRANBY LANDFILL US HIGHWAY 40 AT STATE HWY 125 80446 AIRS GRAND S110636149 GRAND COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE-PORT CR CR 3, 3.5 MILES SOUTH OF HWY 80468 AIRS WINTER PARK U003125009 EAST GRAND FIRE PROTECTION DIST #4 77601 HWY 40 80482 LUST TRUST,LUST,UST WINTER PARK U003195776 CDOT WINTER PARK HWY 40 MP 233.05 80482 LUST TRUST,UST WINTER PARK U003196018 JONES PASS HEADQUARTERS US HWY 40 80482 UST WINTER PARK U003550591 WINTER PARK HQ 78902 HWY 40 80482 LUST FRASER U004008303 THE LIQUOR BARN 76827 HWY 40 80442 LUST,UST WINTER PARK U004008315 ROBERT PETERSEN 78902 HWY 40 80482 UST WINTER PARK U004008316 GOLDEN EAGLE CONOCO 78927 HWY 40 80482 UST WINTER PARK U004147554 BLACKWELL OIL CO INC HWY 40 BEAVERS VILLAGE 0482 ST TC3250426.1s Page 49 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3250426.1s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/10/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 12/10/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2011 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC3250426.1s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/19/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 132 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 303-312-6149 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 303-312-6149 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 303-312-6149 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 303-312-6149 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3250426.1s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 10/03/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3300 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: N/A State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Sites & Facilities Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. TC3250426.1s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/23/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2011 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3300 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 Last EDR Contact: 01/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TRUST: Lust Trust Sites Reimbursement application package. The 1989 Colorado General Assembly established Colorado’s Petroleum Storage Tank Fund. The Fund reimburses eligible applicants for allowable costs incurred in cleaning up petroleum contamination from underground and aboveground petroleum storage tanks, as well as for third-party liability expenses. Remediation of contamination caused by railroad or aircraft fuel is not eligible for reimbursement. The Fund satisfies federal Environmental Protection Agency financial assurance requirements. Monies in the Fund come from various sources, predominantly the state environmental surcharge imposed on all petroleum products except railroad or aircraft fuel. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2012 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tank Listing A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Labor & Employment Telephone: 303-318-8525 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 12/05/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC3250426.1s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 11/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 11/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2012 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: Aboveground Tank List Aboveground storage tank locations. TC3250426.1s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/03/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2012 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Labor and Employment, Oil Inspection Section Telephone: 303-318-8521 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/02/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 12/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). TC3250426.1s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/28/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 05/10/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2011 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 07/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/16/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries AUL: Environmental Real Covenants List Activity and use limitations include both engineering controls and institutional controls. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment to approve requests to restrict the future use of a property using an enforceable agreement called an environmental real covenant. When a contaminated site is not cleaned up completely, land use restrictions may be used to ensure that the selected cleanup remedy is adequately protective of human health and the environment. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/20/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3331 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC3250426.1s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VCP: Voluntary Cleanup & Redevelopment Act Application Tracking Report The Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act is intended to permit and encourage voluntary cleanups by providing a method to determine clean-up responsibilities in planning the reuse of property. The VCRA was intended for sites which were not covered by existing regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 03/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Public Health and Environmental Telephone: 303-692-3331 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 06/27/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3250426.1s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SWRCY: Registered Recyclers Listing A listing of registered recycler locations in the state of Colorado. Date of Government Version: 12/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3337 Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies HISTORICAL LANDFILL: Historical Landfill List Abandoned/Inactive Landfills. Date of Government Version: 01/31/1993 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3300 Last EDR Contact: 09/05/1996 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 10/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Meth Lab Locations Meth lab locations that were reported to the Department of Public Health & Environment. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Public Health and Environment Telephone: 303-692-3023 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records TC3250426.1s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually CO ERNS: Spills Database State reported spills. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Public Health and Environmental Telephone: 303-692-2000 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/08/2011 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 303-312-6149 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. TC3250426.1s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/29/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2011 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 09/28/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2011 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 11/29/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. TC3250426.1s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/18/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC3250426.1s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2011 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 06/21/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC3250426.1s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2011 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 08/02/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/13/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 119 Source: EPA Telephone: (303) 312-6312 Last EDR Contact: 12/13/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Biennially METHANE SITE: Methane Site Investigations - Jefferson County 1980 The objectives of the study are to define as closely as possible the boundaries of methane producing solid waste landfills. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1980 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/1995 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Jefferson County Health Department Telephone: 303-239-7175 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned METHANE INVESTIGATION: Methane Gas & Swamp Findings The primary objective of this study was to assess methane gas related hazards at selected landfill sites in Colorado. These sites were selected by the Colorado Department of Health following evaluation of responses received from County and Municipal agencies about completed and existing landfills within their jurisdiction. TC3250426.1s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/15/1979 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/1995 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 303-640-3335 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Facilities A listing of drycleaning facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3213 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: Permitted Facility Listing A listing of permitted facilities from the Water Quality Control Division. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2011 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3611 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies AIRS: Permitted Facility & Emissions Listing A listing of Air Pollution Control Division permits and emissions data. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3213 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites There were nine uranium mill tailings sites in Colorado designated for cleanup under the federal Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act. These nine sites, know commonly as UMTRA sites, were remediated jointly by the State of Colorado and the U.S. Department of Energy during the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. Mill tailings were removed from 8 of the mill sites and relocated in engineered disposal cells. A disposal cell is designed to encapsulate the material, reduce radon emanation, and prevent the movement of water through the material. At one site, Maybell, CO, the tailings were stabilized in-place at the mill site. After remediation of the tailings was completed, the State and DOE began to investigate the residual impacts to groundwater at the mill sites. The groundwater phase of the UMTRA program is on-going. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2007 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 970-248-7164 Last EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies ASBESTOS: Asbestos Abatement & Demolition Projects Asbestos abatement and demolition projects by the contractor. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2011 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3100 Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. TC3250426.1s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: N/A PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 08/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. TC3250426.1s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/09/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-392-3350 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINANCIAL ASSURANCE 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for hazardous waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2012 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Public Health & Environment Telephone: 303-692-3350 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2012 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned COUNTY RECORDS ADAMS COUNTY: Summary Report on Methane Gas Hazards and Surveys Conducted on Domestic and Demolition Landfills in Adams County As of May 8, 1978, all known landfills or dumping sites in the Adams County area have been surveyed. Date of Government Version: 05/08/1978 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/1995 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ARAPAHOE COUNTY: A Survey of Landfills in Arapahoe County A survey of Arapahoe County was conducted from August through November, 1977, of all open and closed landfills and dumpsites in the county. Each of the sites found was classified as domestic or demolition. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1978 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/1995 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned BOULDER COUNTY: TC3250426.1s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Old Landfill Sites Landfill sites in Boulder county. Date of Government Version: 05/01/1986 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/14/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Boulder County Health Department Telephone: 303-441-1182 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DENVER COUNTY: Landfills in Denver County Landfill sites in the city and county of Denver. Date of Government Version: 12/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/31/1995 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: City and County of Denver Telephone: 303-436-7300 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOUGLAS COUNTY: Douglas County Landfill Key Landfill sites in Douglas county. Date of Government Version: 06/12/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/1995 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PUEBLO COUNTY: Designated Disposal & Landfill Sites Only inert materials. Asphalt, cement, dirt & rock unless otherwise specified. These sites are no longer active. Date of Government Version: 04/30/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Pueblo City-County Health Department Telephone: 719-583-4300 Last EDR Contact: 11/13/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TRI COUNTY: Tri-County Area Solid Waste Facilities List (Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties) Closed Domestic Landfills in Adams County, Closed Domestic Landfills in Arapahoe County, Closed Demolition Landfills in Arapahoe County, Closed Domestic Landfills in Douglas County. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1983 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/04/1995 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tri-County Health Department Telephone: 303-761-1340 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WELD COUNTY: TC3250426.1s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Solid Waste Facilities in Weld County Solid Waste Facilities in Weld County. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2011 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Weld County Department of Public Health Telephone: 970-304-6415 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2011 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 11/22/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/05/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2011 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 11/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/20/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data TC3250426.1s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Daycare Listing Source: Department of Human Services Telephone: 303-866-5958 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Riparian Vegetation Data Source: Division of Wildlife Telephone: 970-416-3360 Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC3250426.1s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Appendix F: Miscellaneous Information CERTIFICATE HOLDER ©1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION.All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2010/05) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CANCELLATION DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LOCJECTPRO-POLICY GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: OCCURCLAIMS-MADE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES (Ea occurrence)$DAMAGE TO RENTED EACH OCCURRENCE $ MED EXP (Any one person)$ PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ $RETENTIONDED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $ AGGREGATE $ EACH OCCURRENCE $UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) INSRLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY)LIMITS WC STATU-TORY LIMITS OTH-ER E.L.EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ $ $ ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE If yes,describe underDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below (Mandatory in NH)OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNEDAUTOSAUTOS AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ $ $ $ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL WVD SUBR N / A $ $ (Ea accident) (Per accident) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: INSURED PHONE(A/C, No, Ext): PRODUCER ADDRESS:E-MAIL FAX(A/C, No): CONTACTNAME: NAIC # INSURER A : INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INS025 (201005).01 12/5/2011 ISU Insurance Services of Colorado, Inc. 950 17th Street, Suite 1000 Denver CO 80202-2819 Julie A. Gutierrez (303)534-2133 (303)892-5579 jgutierrez@isuinsurance.com Corn & Associates Environmental Management, 3625 Raleigh Denver CO 80212 Hudson Specialty Insurance Co. Master 2011-2012 A X Deductible $5,000 X ECC101004415-03 12/6/2011 12/6/2012 1,000,000 50,000 5,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 A Professional Liability ECC101004415-03 12/6/2011 12/6/2012 Each Wrongful Act $1,000,000 Claims Made Retroactive Date 12/5/96 Deductible $5,000 Annette Simon/PL2Annette Simon/PL2 US Bank Linda Everett 111 S.W. 5th Ave., Suite 580 Portland, OR 97204 (503)275-3257 O L D V I C T O R Y R D . R A I L R O A D CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE 10' 20' 10'20' 20' 10' 6' 5' 6' 42' 26' 26' 20' 10' BUILDING A TYPE II 26' 6' 5' 26' 24' BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING C TYPE I BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING G TYPE I GRAND PARK COMMUNITY TRAIL POOL & DECK GARAGE A GARAGE B GARAGE E G A R A G E D G A R A G E C TRASH TRASH MOUNTAIN W I L L O W D R I V E AM E R I C A N W I L L O W D R I V E WETLANDS SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE R25' 24' 24' 26' 26' 24' 15'-2" 26' 26'26' 24' 24' 26' 24' 24' 5' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' 24' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' 34'-1" 28' 29'-10" 27'-8" 19'-9" 20' 24' 16'-8" 63'-10" FIREPIT KITCHEN EXISTING TRAIL p: \ c o r n e r s t o n e m a s t e r f o l d e r \ g r a n d p a r k \ g r a n d p a r k m e a d o w \ 2 w - w i l l o w s \ c a d \ d w g \ a p a r t m e n t s \ w i l l o w s - a p a r t m e n t s i t e p l a n . d w g 2W-Willows Apartments Site Plan November 18, 2019 0 Scale: 1"= 40'-0" 20 40 80N terracina 10200 E. Girard Ave, Ste A-314 Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 td design 0 0 p Grand Park The Willows Site Plan '--�-, -1\!)- __fj_ -c:::,- (J 0 0 'il I 0 � ◊ 0 0 -I --� � "-'"---"--,'--,,,,:--_ -=�-�w0---..--�-�-�..:.,_ ..... .__._"""' __ l:\ __ 1--�-----------�---:.--.,,:;.--1,-.:..-....... --t�ro�ino ID200 �2r� 9ve�te A314 Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 Scale: l "= 60'-0" 0 0 N April 26, 2019 Wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,wetlands_team@fws.gov Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine November 15, 2019 0 0.3 0.60.15 mi 0 0.5 10.25 km 1:1 8,940 This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. O L D V I C T O R Y R D . R A I L R O A D CLUBHOUSE SKI STORAGE 10' 20' 10'20' 20' 10' 6' 5' 6' 42' 26' 26' 20' 10' BUILDING A TYPE II 26' 6' 5' 26' 24' BUILDING B TYPE II BUILDING C TYPE I BUILDING F TYPE II BUILDING D TYPE I BUILDING E TYPE I BUILDING G TYPE I GRAND PARK COMMUNITY TRAIL POOL & DECK GARAGE A GARAGE B GARAGE E G A R A G E D G A R A G E C TRASH TRASH MOUNTAIN W I L L O W D R I V E AM E R I C A N W I L L O W D R I V E WETLANDS SNOW STORAGE SNOW STORAGE R25' 24' 24' 26' 26' 24' 15'-2" 26' 26'26' 24' 24' 26' 24' 24' 5' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' 24' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' R25' 34'-1" 28' 29'-10" 27'-8" 19'-9" 20' 24' 16'-8" 63'-10" FIREPIT KITCHEN EXISTING TRAIL p: \ c o r n e r s t o n e m a s t e r f o l d e r \ g r a n d p a r k \ g r a n d p a r k m e a d o w \ 2 w - w i l l o w s \ c a d \ d w g \ a p a r t m e n t s \ w i l l o w s - a p a r t m e n t s i t e p l a n . d w g 2W-Willows Apartments Site Plan November 18, 2019 0 Scale: 1"= 40'-0" 20 40 80N terracina 10200 E. Girard Ave, Ste A-314 Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 td design 1950 W. Littleton Blvd, Suite 109 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Telephone: 303.730.5919 NOVEMBER 1, 2019 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILLOWS HUD LOT 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST, OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, BEARING S 00° 17’ 02” W, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERE TO; COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29, THENCE N 80° 29’ 11” W, 866.27 FEET AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 55° 40' 13" W, 564.13 FEET; THENCE N 59° 28' 19" E, 348.16 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT M, THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK FILING NO. 3, A SUBDIVISION PLAT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 AT RECEPTION NO. 2016006982 IN THE RECORDS OF THE GRAND COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS’ OFFICE, ALSO BEING A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 328.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29° 57' 45", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 171.53 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 66° 27' 24" E,169.58 FEET; THENCE S 81° 26' 17" E, 214.04 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 36' 00", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 14.23 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 36° 08' 17" E, 12.79 FEET TO A POINT COMPOUND CURVATURE; 1950 W. Littleton Blvd, Suite 109 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Telephone: 303.730.5919 THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 472.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25° 10' 04", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 207.33 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 21° 44' 45" W,205.67 FEET; THENCE S 34° 19' 47" W, 234.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 4.016 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. MICHAEL SEAN KERVIN, PLS 34592 Date: 11/01/19 Project: 18-030 For and on Behalf of Core Consultants, Inc. Notes: 1.) NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown. 2.) Legal description was prepared by Michael Sean Kervin PLS, 1950 W. Littleton Blvd, Suite 103, Littleton, CO 80120. 11/4/19 | | UN I O N P A C I F I C R A I L R O A D (20 0 ' R O W ) SUBJECT PARCEL 174,917 SF 4.016 AC L=171.53'R=328.00' ∆=29°57'45" CH=169.58' C HB=S66°27'24"E S81°26'17"E 2 1 4 . 0 4 ' L=14.23' R=9.00' ∆=90°36'00" CH=12.79' CHB=S36°08'17"E L=207.33' R=472.00' ∆=25°10'04" CH=205.67' CHB=S21°44'45"W S34 ° 1 9 ' 4 7 " W 2 3 4 . 9 6 ' N5 5 ° 4 0 ' 1 3 " W 5 6 4 . 1 3 ' N59°2 8 ' 1 9 " E 3 4 8 . 1 6 ' SHEET 1 OF 1 NOTE: THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENTED SURVEY. IT IS INTENDED ONLY TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION PROJECT: 18-030 DATE: 11/1/19 DR: KDS DS: MSK NOTE: THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENTED SURVEY. IT IS INTENDED ONLY TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION PARCEL CONTAINS 174,917 S.F. OR 4.016 Ac, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO. 1 inch = 100 ft. 200'100'0 SE COR., NE1/4, SE1/4, SEC. 29 T1S, R75W, 6TH P.M., FOUND 1-1/2" STEEL POST WITH 2-1/2" GLO BRASS CAP STAMPED "1933" POINT OF COMMENCEMENT E1/4 CORNER, SEC. 29 T1S, R75W, 6TH P.M., FOUND 1-1/2" STEEL POST WITH 2-1/2" GLO BRASS CAP STAMPED "1933" GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) BASIS OF BEARINGS E. LINE, NE1/4, SE1/4, SEC. 29 S00°17'02"W GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) POINT OF BEGINNING GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) N80°29'11"W 866.27' THE WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK FILING NO. 3 REC.2016006982 LOT 1 11/4/19 1950 W. Littleton Blvd, Suite 109 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Telephone: 303.730.5919 NOVEMBER 19, 2019 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILLOWS HUD LOT 2 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING WITHIN THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST, OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, BEARING S 00° 17’ 02” W, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERE TO; COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29, THENCE N 78° 25’ 04” W, 307.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 40° 19' 05" W, 280.51 FEET; THENCE N 49° 40' 55" W, 223.06 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 2036.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° 30' 34" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 195.77 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 52° 26' 11" W, 195.70 FEET; THENCE N 34° 19' 47" E, 235.03 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 528.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 45' 30", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 117.57 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 27° 57' 02" E, 117.33 FEET; THENCE N 21° 34' 17" E, 46.31 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52° 07' 20", AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 154.65 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 47° 37' 57" E, 149.37 FEET; THENCE N 73° 41' 37" E, 127.85 FEET; 1950 W. Littleton Blvd, Suite 109 Littleton, Colorado 80120 Telephone: 303.730.5919 THENCE S 44° 41' 17" E, 204.94 FEET; THENCE S 45° 18' 43" W, 102.69 FEET; THENCE S 00° 22' 54" W, 309.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 5.494 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. MICHAEL SEAN KERVIN, PLS 34592 Date: 11/19/19 Project: 18-030 For and on Behalf of Core Consultants, Inc. Notes: 1.) NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discovered such defect. In no event, may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown. 2.) Legal description was prepared by Michael Sean Kervin PLS, 1950 W. Littleton Blvd, Suite 103, Littleton, CO 80120. 11-19-19 N78°25'0 4 " W 307.73' UN I O N P A C I F I C R A I L R O A D (20 0 ' R O W ) SUBJECT PARCEL 239,298 SF 5.494 AC S40 ° 1 9 ' 0 5 " W 280 . 5 1 ' S0 ° 2 2 ' 5 4 " W 30 9 . 2 0 ' S45°18'43"W 102.69' S 4 4 ° 4 1 ' 1 7 " E 2 0 4 . 9 4 ' N73°41'3 7 " E 127.85' L=154.65' R=170.00' ∆=52°07'20" CH=149.37' CHB=N47°37'57"E N21°34'17"E 46.31' L=117.57' R=528.00' ∆=12°45'30" CH=117.33' CHB=N27°57'02"E N34 ° 1 9 ' 4 7 " E 235 . 0 3 ' L=195.7 7' R =203 6.0 0' ∆=5°30'3 4" C H =19 5.7 0' C H B= N 52°2 6'11" W N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 5 5 " W 2 2 3 . 0 6 ' N SUBJECT PARCEL 239,298 SF 5.494 AC S 40°1 9 ' 0 5 " W 280. 5 1 ' S0 ° 2 2 ' 5 4 " W 30 9 . 2 0 ' S 1 4 4 ° 4 1 ' 1 7 2 0 4 . 9 4 ' N 127.85∆=52°07'20" CH=149.37' N47°37'57"E N21°34'17"EN21° 46.31' 947 " E 235. 0 3 ' L=195.7 7' =203 6.0 0' 5°30'3 4" 9 5.7 0'2 6'11" N 4 9 ° 4 0 ' 5 5 " W 2 2 3 . 06 SHEET 1 OF 1 NOTE: THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENTED SURVEY. IT IS INTENDED ONLY TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION S. LINE, NE1/4, SEC. 29 PROJECT: 18-030 DATE: 11/19/19 DR: KDS DS: MSK NOTE: THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT A MONUMENTED SURVEY. IT IS INTENDED ONLY TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED DESCRIPTION PARCEL CONTAINS 239,298 S.F. OR 5.494 Ac, MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT EAST HALF, SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO. 200' 1 inch = 200 ft. 0 400' SE COR., NE1/4, SE1/4, SEC. 29 T1S, R75W, 6TH P.M., FOUND 1-1/2" STEEL POST WITH 2-1/2" GLO BRASS CAP STAMPED "1933" POINT OF COMMENCEMENT E1/4 CORNER, SEC. 29 T1S, R75W, 6TH P.M., FOUND 1-1/2" STEEL POST WITH 2-1/2" GLO BRASS CAP STAMPED "1933" GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) BASIS OF BEARINGS E. LINE, NE1/4, SE1/4, SEC. 29 S00°17'02"W E. L I N E , N E 1 / 4 , S E C . 2 9 GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC (UNPLATTED) POINT OF BEGINNING 11-19-19 GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 30 WINTER PARK, CO 80482-0030 Account: R309991 Tax Area: 121 - FRASER, WEST MEADOW METRO Acres: 154.100 Parcel: 1587-294-00-155 Situs Address: Super Neighborhood 4100 - AGRICULTURAL EA1 Value Summary Value By:Market Override Land (1)$55,180 N/A Land (2)$1,500 N/A Total $56,680 $56,680 Legal Description Subd: METES & BOUNDS 75 ALL 154.1 AC BEING IN PT S2SE4 SEC 20, PT SW4NW4 & NW4SW4 SEC 28 & PT N2NE4 & PT SE4NE4 SEC 29 LYING NORTH OF RAILROAD ALL IN T1S R75W LESS TRACT LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF US HWY 40 ROW & LESS PT NW4NE4 SEC 29 BEING PT COZENS MEADOW AT GRAND PARK DESC AT REC NO 2007006785 AND LESS VILLAGE AT GRAND PARK FILING 1 DESC AT REC NO 2008007834 AND LESS VILLAGE AT GRAND PARK FILING 2A DESC AT 2008007840 LESS THAT PART DESC AT 2015004926 LESS THAT PT DESC AT 2016002214 LESS 2016 Public Remarks Entry Date Model Remark 09/26/2008 Land Occurrence 1 SP08-54 SP08-55 SP08-56 THIS SCHDL NO DID NOT CHANGE SPLIT TO R305061-68 9/26/08 IN FUTURE YR WWW 10/12/2011 Land Occurrence 1 SP11-053 FM R305066 10/12/2012 WWW Land Occurrence 1 Property Code 4137 - MEADOW LAND Neighborhood 160975.01 - METES AND BOUNDS 1S Use Code 4000 - AGRICULTURAL Land Code 48494 - MEADOW 2TON Land Access 5 - HIGHWAY ACCESS Topography Code 0 - NA DONT KNOW Ground Cover 0 - NA DONT KNOW Land View 5 - EXCELLENT Exposure 5 - IDEAL SLOPE TO S EXCELLENT SOL Water 0 - NA DONT KNOW Adjustment 4 0 Electricity 0 - NOT AVAILABLE Property Record Card Grand County Assessor's Office A#: R309991 P#: 158729400155 As of: 11/20/2019 Page 1 of 2 Land Occurrence 1 Gas 0 - NOT AVAILABLE Public Water 0 - NO Sewer Type 0 - NO Well Water 0 - NO Access Code 1 - YES View Code 1 - YES Winter Park or Fraser 1 - YES SubArea ACTUAL EFFECTIV E FINBSMNT FOOTPRIN T GARAGE HEATED LIVEAREA UNF_BSMT Land A 101.412 Total 101.412 Value Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate $55,180 544.13 Land Occurrence 2 Property Code 4147 - DRY GRAZE Neighborhood 160975.01 - METES AND BOUNDS 1S Use Code 4000 - AGRICULTURAL Land Code 48511 - DRYGRZ 40AC Winter Park or Fraser 1 - YES SubArea ACTUAL EFFECTIV E FINBSMNT FOOTPRIN T GARAGE HEATED LIVEAREA UNF_BSMT Land A 52.688 Total 52.688 Value Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate $1,500 28.47 Abstract Summary Code Classification Actual Value Value Taxable Value Actual Value Override Taxable Override 4137 MEADOW LAND $55,180 $16,000 NA NA 4147 DRY GRAZE $1,500 $440 NA NA Total $56,680 $16,440 NA NA Property Record Card Grand County Assessor's Office A#: R309991 P#: 158729400155 As of: 11/20/2019 Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX C: INTERVIEWS / FOIAS From:Roye, Jovianne To:amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us Subject:Open Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:29:00 PM Attachments:19-246019.2 Open Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park.pdf Good Afternoon, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 Attached is a completed records request form for the property listed above. If any more information is needed from our company in regards to the completion of this request, please contact me at 410- 390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 443-377-3895 or send via e-mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895   More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here 5 PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST PLEASE PRINT Name: Date of Request: Address: Town: State: Zip: Phone: Day Evening Email: INSTRUCTIONS Indicate the information you desire and/or list each requested document. Please be as specific as possible. Allow three (3) working days for a search of the records. Per the State of Colorado Open Records Act (C.R.S. 24-72-203), if the request is substantially large or is maintained off-site, an extension of seven (7) working days is permitted. You will be notified within three (3) days of any extension and all estimated costs. Please select the format in which you would like to receive materials: View only, no copies requested. Appropriate personnel will be scheduled to accompany you during viewing. Hard copies/printouts CD* email* *not all documents are available electronically. Data manipulation fees may apply. Please select the method you prefer for notification when the records are available: U.S. First Class mail I will pick up the records. Contact me by (circle one) mail phone email email (if records are available electronically) If records are not available by email, please specify an alternate method: _____________________________________ =================================================================== Jovianne Roye October 30, 2019 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301 Baltimore MD 21204 410-390-4899 jroye@partneresi.com Please see attachment below for records requested. mail 6 For Staff Use Only Received by:Date/Time: Estimated charges: Hard Copy:Copies @ 25 cents per page CD:Copies @ $20.00 each Other: Retrieval and Research:hours X $per hour = $total Deposit required: $ 100% of the estimated total, if in excess of $10.00 ============================================================== I agree to pay the charges incurred in processing this request pursuant to the schedule of fees and charges currently in place, including, if necessary, any amounts exceeding the estimates set forth above. This request will be considered received when this form is complete and the deposit is paid. If no deposit is required, the request shall be considered received upon receipt by the Records Custodian. Signature of requestor Date and time of request ====================================================================== Request completed by:Date: Method of delivery: ====================================================================== Request denied by:Date: Reason(s) for denial: 10/30/2019 1:30pm 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore MD 21204 ◊ Phone 410-390-4899 ◊ Fax 443-377-3895 October 30, 2019 VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting any zoning, building, fire, or environmental health records you have for the above-referenced property pertaining to the following: •current zoning designation, if the current use is permitted, and conditional uses (if any) If there are no open zoning code violations, please include the statement: There are No open zoning code violations for this property. •any unresolved notices of violation/to comply, date of last inspection by the building department, copies of any open building department permits, copies of certificates of occupancy, copies of permits and records for any current or historic storage tanks If there are no open building code violations, please include the statement: There are No open building code violations for this property. •hazardous materials incidents, fire inspection records, outstanding fire code violations -- We are especially looking to learn if there are any open fire code violations and to obtain the results of the last inspection by the fire department. If there are no open fire code violations, please include the statement: There are No open fire code violations for this property. •records of asbestos or lead-based paint, septic system and water well information, human health concerns Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. If any more information is needed from our company regarding the completion of this request, please contact me at 410-390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 410-390-4899 or send via e-mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Sincerely, Jovianne Roye Process Specialist - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 2013 TP, Fraser, 2013, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 From:Roye, Jovianne To:rdavis@co.grand.co.us Subject:Environmental Health Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:15:00 PM Attachments:19-246019.2 Environmental Health Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park.pdf Good Afternoon, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 Attached is a completed records request form for the property listed above. Please let me know if I have reached the right department. If any more information is needed from our company in regards to the completion of this request, please contact me at 410-390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 443-377-3895 or send via e-mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895  More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here October 30, 2019 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore MD 21204 ◊ Phone 410-390-4899 ◊ Fax 443-377-3895 October 30, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following properties: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above- referenced property pertaining to the following: •Asbestos or lead-based paint found at the property •Septic system and water well information •Human health concerns •Hazardous materials incidents •Regional specific issues Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. If any more information is needed from our company regarding the completion of this request, please contact me at 410-390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 410-390-4899 or send via e- mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Sincerely, Jovianne Roye Process Specialist - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 2013 TP, Fraser, 2013, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 From:Roye, Jovianne To:cdphe.recordsrequests@state.co.us Subject:DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:30:00 PM DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST   Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2   As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above- referenced property pertaining to the following: Current or historical use of hazardous materials and/or hazardous waste Groundwater monitoring wells Current or historical clarifiers, oil/water separators, grease traps, interceptors Incidents of lead or asbestos, fires, leaks [USTs/ASTs] and spills Code Violations or Notices to Comply Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. Please forward any records that exist for the aforementioned property or any other pertinent information, at your earliest convenience. Also, please notify Partner if there are any costs associated with this request prior to processing. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895   More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here From:Roye, Jovianne To:caley.fisher@state.co.us Subject:State Fire Violations/Records Request Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:30:00 PM Good Morning, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above- referenced property pertaining to the following:   Records pertaining to underground and above ground storage tanks Hazardous materials incidents Inspection records Any outstanding violations We are especially looking to learn if there are any open fire code violations and to obtain the results of the last inspection by the fire department. If there are no open fire code violations, please include the statement: There are No open fire code violations for this property.   Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. Please forward any records that exist for the aforementioned property or any other pertinent information, at your earliest convenience. Also, please notify Partner if there are any costs associated with this request prior to processing. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895   More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here 3800 Maple Avenue, Suite 510, Dallas, Texas 75219 ◊ Phone 214-234-9561 November 6, 2019 Steve Turner State Historic Preservation Officer History Colorado 1200 Broadway Denver, CO 80203 Subject: Request for Section 106 Consultation HUD [Section 221(d)(4)] Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Fraser, Colorado 80442 Partner Project No. 19-246019.2 Partner Assessment Corporation is conducting an Environmental Site Assessment of the above-mentioned address. We respectfully request consultation regarding the proposed project in accordance with 36 CFR 800. This assessment is being conducted on behalf of a financial services client under HUD guidelines, as well as all federal, state and local guidelines, and, therefore, it is necessary to determine if any historic properties, either on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) will be affected by the proposed undertaking. Proposed Development: The project site consists of 16.7-acres of undeveloped land located north of and adjacent to Old Victory Road, in Fraser, Grand County, Colorado. The project site is assigned Assessor’s Parcel Number 158729400155 by the Grand County Appraisal District. Currently, the project site is undeveloped land, with a road developed in the central portion, and adjacent to the north. The area appears to be part of a larger master development plan for Grand Park. It is within a Planned Development District Zone. The project site is proposed to be developed with a multifamily Apartment complex known as The Willows at Grand Park. The proposed Phase I development will consist of seven (7), apartment buildings that will contain approximately 132 total multi-family units with one bedroom (48 units), two bedroom (66 units), and three bedroom (18 units) apartments. The Phase I development will contain approximate five (5) garage buildings and approximately 261 total parking spaces. The proposed Phase II development will consist of five (5), apartment buildings that will contain approximately 72 total multi-family units with one bedroom (12 units), two bedroom (42 units), and three bedroom (18 units) apartments. The Phase II will contain four (4) garage buildings and approximately 128 total parking spaces. Area of Potential Effect (APE): The Area of Potential Effect (APE) for this project is defined as the subject parcel and all adjacent parcels (see APE Map). Review of Resources: Partner reviewed the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation COMPASS system and map viewers, Colorado State Registry of Historic Places, 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Colorado State Historic Monuments and Landmark sites, historical topographic maps, and historical aerial photographs. Based on a review of these sources, no historical or archaeological resources have been recorded within the APE of the project. The results of the records search indicate that three (3) previous surveys/inventories have been performed within one mile, and one of them included the project site, adjacent parcels, and surrounding area in 2003. Six (6) cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources are located on the project site, and one archaeological site and an isolated find (5GA.3158 and 5GA.3161) are recorded adjacent to the north. A NRHP listed property is located approximately 0.23-miles to the east, the Cozens Ranch House. The Records Search Report is attached. The review of historical resources indicate that the project site and the surrounding parcel have been undeveloped and wooded land from circa 1926-1976. In 1976, the land in the western and northern portions of the project site, and adjacent parcels, were cleared of tree growth. The land was vacant until circa 2007, when a dirt roads was developed to the south. In 2009, dirt roads are developed along the boundary of the project site, to the north, south, and one in the central portion. Circa 2017, road are paved and houses are developed to the north. Conclusion: Based on available information regarding historic properties in the vicinity, Partner concludes that there are No Historic Properties on the project site or adjacent parcels (The APE), that are listed on or eligible for the NRHP. The project site and surrounding area were professionally surveyed for archaeological resources by SWCA, INC. in 2003. One recorded lithic site and an isolated find were recorded adjacent to the north/east, which were determined not to be eligible for listing on the NRHP. Based on the recent survey and results, no further work is deemed necessary. We ask that you concur with these findings or offer additional guidance. If additional information is needed, please contact me at 214-447-0266 or at jdensmore@partneresi.com. Sincerely, Julie Densmore, M.S., Registered Professional Archaeologist Project Manager PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC. 2800 DALLAS PARKWAY, STE 140, PLANO TEXAS 75093 P: 214-447-0266 | C: 214-784-8458 | F: 214-380-4962 COMPASS RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS Report Date: November 6, 2019 Partner Project No. 19-246019.2 Prepared for: Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC HUD 221(d)(4) Project Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Fraser, Colorado 80442 November 6, 2019 Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC HUD 221(d)(4) Project Subject: COAHP Records Search Results Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Fraser, Colorado 80442 Partner Project No. 19-246019.2 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the COAHP Records Search Results for the above-mentioned address. This report contains sensitive material on archaeological sites and their locations and is not for public distribution. Therefore, attached is a redacted version for your records. A full version with maps, locations, and site records has been sent to the CO SHPO office for review and concurrence. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at (214) 447-0266 Sincerely, Julie Densmore, M.S., Registered Professional Archaeologist Project Manager NEPA Services PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC. 2800 DALLAS PARKWAY, STE 140, PLANO TEXAS 75093 P: 214-447-0266 | C: 214-784-8458 | F: 214-380-4962 P a g e 1 | 5 Record Search Results Proposed Willows Apartments at Grand Park Phase I and II 246019.2 RECORDS SEARCH The purpose of the records search is to identify all previously recorded cultural resources (prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, historic buildings, structures, objects, or districts) within the Project Area. All cultural resources as well as cultural resource surveys performed within one-mile of the project site were reviewed. Ms. Julie Densmore completed a search for archaeological and historical records on October 30, and November 5, 2019 online using the Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation COMPASS system and map viewers. The project site is located within the Fraser USGS 7.5’ topographic map. The results of the records search indicate that three (3) previous surveys/inventories have been performed within one mile, and one of them included the subject property, adjacent parcels, and surrounding area in 2003 (Table 1). Six (6) cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources are located on the project site, and one archaeological site and an isolated find (5GA.3158 and 5GA.3161) are recorded adjacent to the north (Table 2). TABLE 1. PREVIOUS SURVEYS & REPORTS WITHIN A ONE-MILE RADIUS OF PROJECT ID Report Title Year Direction GA.AE.R3 Rendezvous West Mountain Project Class II And Class III Cultural Resources Inventory, Grand County, Colorado (SWCA NO. 2003-324) 2003 Includes the subject property and adjacent parcels/surrounding area from highway 40 approx. 1.5-mi south of it; T1S, R75W, Section 19-20, 28-32 GA.FS.R154 A Class III Cultural Resource Inventory Of The Fair Tap Distribution Line, Grand County, Colorado. Centennial Archaeology, Inc. For The Arapaho And Roosevelt National Forests 2008 North of Project Site P a g e 2 | 5 ID Report Title Year Direction MC.LM.R7 Final Report of Class I Cultural Resource Inventory of the Kremmling Resource Area. CSU for the BLM 1981 East of Project Site MC.SHF.R1 52 and MC.SHF.R1 53 Colorado Mountain Heritage Alliance: Adventure Passport To History & Culture, Heritage Tourism Pilot Project Proposal/Finalists, Multiple Counties (SHF 2005-T1-006) 2006 East of Project Site TABLE 2. CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDED Trinomial Resource Type Description Distance from Project 5GA.3158 Prehistoric- lithic scatter Prehistoric lithic scatter with debitage, flakes, and one chalcedony biface. Not eligible NRHP- field 2003 (SHPO Notes) Adjacent north 5GA.3159 Historic Historic foundation structure or alignment. Described as a log structure, tent platform, abandoned. Not eligible NRHP- field 2003 (SHPO Notes) 0.48-miles South 5GA.3160 Historic Historic trash area with bottles, glass ceramic fragments, nails, RR spikes, metal cans and buckets, and various rubber and other building materials. Not eligible NRHP- field 2003 (SHPO Notes) 0.61- miles west 5GA.3161 Prehistoric One prehistoric flake made of quartzite material. Isolated find. Not eligible NRHP- field 2003 (SHPO Notes) Adjacent north P a g e 3 | 5 Trinomial Resource Type Description Distance from Project 5GA.196 Historic 1874 Cozens Ranch House: Single dwelling, one of a few remaining plank log houses in Colorado. Used as a post office and stage stop between Georgetown and Hot Sulfur Springs until 1905; a chapel for Regis College, and the deeded to the Grand County Historical Association in 1987; presently used as a museum. Built in 1874/1876 by architect William Zane Cozens, a pioneer. Nominated in 1986 by the Grand County Historic Preservation Board and listed on the NRHP in 1988. 0.23- miles east 5GA.438 Historical Marker Winter Park Historical Marker; no other information provided in records other than recorded by the OAHP in 2014. 0.23- miles east OTHER SOURCES In addition to the COMPASS records search, Ms. Densmore consulted a variety of sources in October/November 2019 to obtain information regarding the cultural context of the Project Area. Sources included the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the Colorado State Register of Historic Properties, Colorado State Historical Monuments, Colorado Historical Landmarks, and Colorado Certified Local Districts. TABLE 3. ADDITIONAL SOURCES CONSULTED Source Results Historic USGS Topographic Maps; Fraser Co 7.5-minute 1924/1926 – No development on the project site or adjacent parcels to the north; the Denver and Salt Lake Railroad tracks are adjacent to the south; Elk Creek and a tributary are depicted to the southwest and Leland Creek to the southeast. Flow and topographic slopes to the northeast. Two structures are depicted to the east, followed by a road, two structures (presumably the Cozens Ranch House), and the Fraser River. The City of Fraser is developed to the northwest, with a few streets and structures. 1944/1948: Highway 40 is labeled; no specific changes depicted 1957 (1959-1988 editions): Increased development in the City of Fraser. Maryvale is depicted across the P a g e 4 | 5 Source Results highway with multiple structures and one main road; the two structures west of the highway are no longer depicted; several additional structures are depicted in the vicinity of the Cozens ranch House. A cemetery is depicted to the northwest, adjacent to the west of the railroad tracks; a cemetery is depicted northwest of Maryvale and north of the Fraser River. 2013: Old Victory Road is depicted to the south; the cemetery to the west is labeled as Fraser Cemetery and the Cozens Ranch Cemetery is depicted northwest of Maryvale. No structures are depicted on the map, only topographic features, roads, and cemeteries. Aerial Photographs 1953: The project site is undeveloped and wooded land with no structures. Wooded land followed by grassland to the north; Further north is a road, two structures along a dirt road, and the river,; wooded land and railroad tracks to the south; wooded and undeveloped land to the east and west. 1976/1979: The western and northern portions of the project site are no longer wooded; the area adjacent to the north is no longer wooded; four structures are visible across the road to the north. 1989: No specific changes on the project site or adjacent parcels; Highway 40 is now paved; A large structure is developed across the highway, north of the existing ones, that appears commercial. 1999: No specific changes on the project site or adjacent parcels, with the exception of dirt roads and more trees are visible. 2005: No specific changes on the project site or adjacent parcels; A dirt road and potential operations are visible further to the east. A series of ponds or basins are visible to the north across the wooded and undeveloped land. 2009/2013: Apparent roads are being developed around the project site, areas have been cleared of vegetation along the boundaries; the ponds to the north are filled with water; a structure is developed to the east, in the area of previous disturbance; an additional structure that appears to be commercial is developed across the highway; roads are developed in the area of the Cozens Ranch house (still visible). 2017: A road is developed to the north and south of the project site, and one is developed in the central portion; developed with single family houses or townhomes P a g e 5 | 5 Source Results adjacent to the north, followed by a road, wooded and undeveloped land, and agriculture. Agricultural use to the east, followed by commercial development and Highway 40. National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) None in APE area; Cozens Ranch House to the east Colorado State Register of Historic Properties None in APE area Colorado State Historic Monuments None in Project area Colorado Historical Landmarks None in Project area Colorado Certified Local Districts None in Project area Bureau of Land Management (BLM) General Land Office Records Township 1 South, Range 75 West, Section 29, 6th Meridian APE MAP Project No. 19-246019.2 KEY: Project Site APE Phase I Phase II NRHP Cozens Ranch House E. Grand Fire District 77601 US-40 Citywide Bank 77699 US-40 Fraser Valley Metro Rec District/ Grand Park Recreational Center Grand Park Development Sigle family Homes Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | All Sites Search Result Search |< < > >| Filters: All Sites Search County contains 'Grand' Location: (( Location 1:Principal Meridian='6TH' AND Township='1S' AND Range='75W' AND Section IN ('29') ) ) Records 1-6 displayed out of 6 total matches as of 11/05/2019 15:11:02 Photos Images Site ID Site Name Assessment View Map 5GA.3158 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD View Map 5GA.3159 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD View Map 5GA.3160 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD View Map 5GA.3161 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD Survey(s) View Map GA.AE.R3 RENDEZVOUS WEST MOUNTAIN PROJECT CLASS I... View Map GA.FS.R154 A CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ... Search |< < > >| Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | All Sites Survey Detail Search List |< < > >| Survey ID: GA.AE.R3 Title: RENDEZVOUS WEST MOUNTAIN PROJECT CLASS II AND CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO (SWCA NO. 2003-324) Author: KOHLER, TODD Date: 9/2003 Contractor: SWCA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FOR THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Images No Images *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 19 E SE 6TH 1S 75W 20 SW 6TH 1S 75W 28 W SW 6TH 1S 75W 29 NW 6TH 1S 75W 30 NW SW 6TH 1S 75W 31 6TH 1S 75W 32 SE E EDGE NE E N SW UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 30 493mE 44 21 569mN 13:4 31 077mE 44 21 579mN 13:4 32 422mE 44 20 488mN 13:4 32 539mE 44 19 952mN 13:4 32 168mE 44 19 163mN 13:4 30 580mE 44 17 954mN 13:4 29 762mE 44 17 964mN 13:4 29 742mE 44 19 280mN 13:4 30 113mE 44 20 127mN Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | All Sites Survey Detail Search List |< < > >| Survey ID: GA.FS.R154 Title: A CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY OF THE FAIR TAP DISTRIBUTION LINE, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO Author: MARK, ROBERT F., CHRISTIAN J. ZIER AND DENISE FALLON ZIER Date: 12/2008 Contractor: CENTENNIAL ARCHAEOLOGY, INC. FOR THE ARAPAHO AND ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FORESTS Images No Images *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters STRAWBERRY LAKE 6TH 1S 75W 20 SE 6TH 1S 75W 29 NE UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 31 158mE 44 31 489mN 13:4 31 206mE 44 31 481mN 13:4 31 187mE 44 30 872mN 13:4 31 140mE 44 30 840mN Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | Prehistoric Archaeological Site Detail Search List |< < > >| Site ID: 5GA.3158 Map Name: *** Street Address(s) *** County: Grand Resource Type: Archaeological Assessment Date Description 09/20/2003 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD Recorder Date Description 09/20/2003 SWCA, Inc. - Denver Metro Office Condition Date Description 09/20/2003 Good/Light Disturbance 09/20/2003 Good/Light Disturbance Images No Images Absolute Date Method Comments Related Sites No Related Sites *** Document(s) *** ID: GA.AE.R3 Title: RENDEZVOUS WEST MOUNTAIN PROJECT CLASS II AND CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO (SWCA NO. 2003-324) Author: KOHLER, TODD Date: 9/2003 Contractor: SWCA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FOR THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS *** ARCHITECTURE *** *** ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA *** Site Type OPEN LITHIC Culture UNSPECIFIED Feature(s) Cnt Description Artifact(s) Cnt Description 37 FLAKE, CHERT 1 DEBITAGE, CHERT 1 BIFACE/KNIFE, CHALCEDONY *** RADIO CARBON DATA *** *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Township Range Section Quarters UTM Meridian FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 29 NE NW SE NE Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 31 887mE 44 20 652mN Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | Historic Archaeology Site Detail Search List |< < > >| Site ID: 5GA.3159 Map Name: *** Street Address(s) *** County: Grand Resource Type: Historical Archaeology Assessment Date Description 09/17/2003 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD Recorder Date Description 09/17/2003 SWCA, Inc. - Denver Metro Office Condition Date Description 09/17/2003 Ruins Images No Images Absolute Date Method Comments Related Sites No Related Sites *** Document(s) *** ID: GA.AE.R3 Title: RENDEZVOUS WEST MOUNTAIN PROJECT CLASS II AND CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO (SWCA NO. 2003-324) Author: KOHLER, TODD Date: 9/2003 Contractor: SWCA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FOR THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS *** ARCHITECTURE *** Site Type: LOG STRUCTURE Original Use: TENT PLATFORM Present Use: ABANDONED *** ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA *** Site Type HISTORIC, STRUCTURE/FOUNDATION/ALIGNMENT Culture EUROPEAN - AMERICAN Feature(s) Cnt Description 1 FOUNDATION/PLAZA Artifact(s) Cnt Description *** RADIO CARBON DATA *** *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 29 SE SW SE SE UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 31 939mE 44 19 517mN Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | Historic Archaeology Site Detail Search List |< < > >| Site ID: 5GA.3160 Map Name: *** Street Address(s) *** County: Grand Resource Type: Historical Archaeology Assessment Date Description 09/17/2003 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD Recorder Date Description 09/17/2003 SWCA, Inc. - Denver Metro Office Condition Date Description 09/17/2003 Deteriorating Images No Images Absolute Date Method Comments Related Sites No Related Sites *** Document(s) *** ID: GA.AE.R3 Title: RENDEZVOUS WEST MOUNTAIN PROJECT CLASS II AND CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO (SWCA NO. 2003-324) Author: KOHLER, TODD Date: 9/2003 Contractor: SWCA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FOR THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS *** ARCHITECTURE *** Site Type: TRASH DUMP Original Use: TRASH DUMP Present Use: ABANDONED *** ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA *** Site Type HISTORIC, TRASH DUMP Culture EUROPEAN - AMERICAN Feature(s) Cnt Description 1 TRASH CONCENTRATION Artifact(s) Cnt Description 100s WINDOW GLASS, CLEAR 1000s BOTTLE - GLASS/CERAMIC, FRAGMENTS 10 BOTTLE - GLASS/CERAMIC,FRAGMENTS, PURPLE 100s GLASS - MISCELLANEOUS, AQUA 1 UNSPECIFIED PLAINWARE, FRAGMENT, DISHES/COOKING WARE 50 NAILS/RAILROAD SPIKES 4 CAN/BUCKET - METAL 16 CAN/BUCKET - METAL 100s METAL - MISCELLANEOUS, FRAGMENTS 3 RUBBER 10 BUILDING MATERIALS/ELEMENTS 10 BUILDING MATERIALS/ELEMENTS *** RADIO CARBON DATA *** *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 29 NW NW NW NW SW NW NW NW NW SW NW NW UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 30 618mE 44 20 925mN Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | All Sites Site Detail Search List |< < > >| Site ID: 5GA.3161 Map Name: *** Street Address(s) *** County: Grand Resource Type: Archaeological Assessment Date Description 09/20/2003 NOT ELIGIBLE - FIELD Recorder Date Description 09/20/2003 SWCA, Inc. - Denver Metro Office Condition Date Description Images No Images Absolute Date Method Comments Related Sites No Related Sites *** Document(s) *** ID: GA.AE.R3 Title: RENDEZVOUS WEST MOUNTAIN PROJECT CLASS II AND CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY, GRAND COUNTY, COLORADO (SWCA NO. 2003-324) Author: KOHLER, TODD Date: 9/2003 Contractor: SWCA, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FOR THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS *** ARCHITECTURE *** *** ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA *** Site Type ISOLATED FIND Culture UNSPECIFIED Feature(s) Cnt Description Artifact(s) Cnt Description 1 FLAKE, QUARTZITE *** RADIO CARBON DATA *** *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 29 SW NE SE NE UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 32 018mE 44 20 544mN Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | All Sites Site Detail Search List |< < > >| Site ID: 5GA.196 Map Name: COZENS RANCH HOUSE, MARYVALE *** Street Address(s) *** Number Dir. Street City HIGHWAY 40 FRASER (VICINITY) County: Grand Resource Type: Historic Assessment Date Description 06/09/1988 LISTED - NATIONAL REGISTER 05/01/1974 Pending in Washington 1974 No assessment given on form Recorder Date Description 05/01/1974 No organization given on form 02/01/1986 Grand County Historic Preservation Board Condition Date Description 09/07/1988 Excellent/Undisturbed Images Notice of Additional Information View 001 Notice Site Info/Nomination/Images View 001 Map View 002 Photograph View 003 Photograph View More Images... Absolute Date Method Comments Related Sites No Related Sites *** Document(s) *** ID: MC.LM.R7 Title: FINAL REPORT OF A CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY OF THE KREMMLING RESOURCE AREA (DRAFT) Author: SCHUBERT, KAREN C. Date: 10/01/1981 Contractor: LABORATORY OF PUBLIC ARCHAEOLOGY-COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOR THE BLM CRAIG DISTRICT ID: MC.SHF.R152 Title: COLORADO MOUNTAIN HERITAGE ALLIANCE: ADVENTURE PASSPORT TO HISTORY & CULTURE, HERITAGE TOURISM PILOT PROJECT PROPOSAL, MULTIPLE COUNTIES (SHF 2005-T1-006) Author: UNSPECIFIED Date: 2006 Contractor: THE CHAMBER AND TOURISM BUREAU OF CLEAR CREEK COUNTY FOR THE COLORADO TOURISM BOARD ID: MC.SHF.R153 Title: CORRESPONDENCE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PILOT PROJECT FINALISTS, HERITAGE TOURISM PILOT PROJECT, MULTIPLE COUNTIES (SHF 2005-T1-006) Author: UNSPECIFIED Date: 04/12/2006 Contractor: VARIOUS FOR THE COLORADO TOURISM BOARD *** ARCHITECTURE *** Original Use: SINGLE DWELLING, HOTEL, POST OFFICE, STAGE STOP Present Use: MUSEUM Early Date: 1874 Late Date: 1874 Architect: COZENS, WILLIAM ZANE Feature: IRREGULAR PLAN, FRONT GABLED ROOF, 1.5 STORIES, VERTICAL SIDING, ASPHALT ROOF, PORCH, CHIMNEY, OVERHANGING EAVES Style: NO STYLE *** ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA *** Site Type Culture Feature(s) Cnt Description Artifact(s) Cnt Description *** RADIO CARBON DATA *** *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 28 SE NW UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 32 433mE 44 20 589mN Site Number 5GA.196 Please Note Some of the items previously filed with this cultural resource record were not scanned. These items may include: · Published and copyrighted materials -including newspaper and magazine clippings · Bound material -including brochures and pamphlets · Microfiche · Negatives · Computer disks or CDs · Documents · Items over 17 x 11 These items are now stored in the Supplementary Files in the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation at the Colorado Historical Society. 1 COZENS RANCH RESTORATION The first room the public will enter was apparently the earliest kitchen and also served briefly as a Post Office and store. The worn areas of the floor suggest much heavier use than in other parts of the building. The dry sink in the corner was standard for the period. Water was 'brought in in buckets, poured down the drain to another bucket for disposal -just one more chore that modern living need not cope with. Colors used in this room and the hall match the earliest paint samples revealed by careful removal of many layers. Carpet subsequently covered the hall-way and there were as many layers of that as of paint! Samples of these carpets can be seen in the parlor. The stove in the corner is of unknown origin but was bought by the donor in the early 1950s from a motel owner in Hot Sulphur Springs who said it was "old" and had been in the county for a "long time". No early photos show any sign of curtains in the windows of any part of the house. There do appear, however to have been roller shades, two of which were found at the upstairs hall windows. They are thought to be of the Cozens period. Straight chairs seen throughout the house are those which appear in many of the early photos. The stair bannister retains its original finish and is quite finely done. It is the only item of this quality in the house and is said to have been done by a brother of William Z. Cozens. In an early photo taken from outdoors looking in, a stair carpet is clearly visible and the old nail holes of that carpet can still be seen. The carpet was very likely one of the designs displayed in the parlor. Proceeding up the stairs, the first room on the left is exhibited as it might have looked as one of the hotel rooms for overnight stage-coach passengers or other visitors. We know, at times, these rooms were reserved for ladies and the men were sent to a hayloft. But since the buildings housed guests year round, men surely occupied these rooms sometimes. Since Mary Elizabeth describes her own room as very, very simple (cot, chair, trunk!) the hotel rooms were no doubt similar. Some surely had three quarter or full beds but we chose to put our bigger bed downstairs in "mama's room". (No mention of where "papa" slept, but, maybe, there.) Note the clothes-hook board which has a candle holder made from a tin can. This is original to the house. Also note that none of the doors on this floor fit the openings. Why? They were obviously done at a mill (there was one nearby) and - ------------ 2 brought in as were, apparently. All the other doors in the house except one downstairs, fit correctly. The transoms above the doors provide the only light and would allow for some ventilation. Mr. Cozens supposedly stated that those rooms didn't need windows as all people did in them was sleep! All the bedroom floors and some of the baseboards on this level are shown with the original paint. Reference was made in several places to "mats" by the beds and Mary Elizabeth mentions making some, but we don't know what they were. They were apparently changed either seasonally or occasionally. There is no evidence of the rooms up here being carpeted at any time though the hall still shows the holes from carpet tacks. By the head of the stairs you see a religious token in the spot where it was found. Also note evidence of smoke damage to the lath and plaster construction. Perhaps the "Sacred Heart" "scapular" was placed in thanks for afire which was quickly stopped or as protection against such a thing happening again. The inscription reads "Thy Kingdom Come ------(something which we, so far, can not fathom) June 14, 1877". The plaster mentioned was part of the lath and plaster technique which was used throughout this house and almost all others until the introduction of "plaster board" or dry wall. Old style lath and plaster work was replaced in the hallway and certain other parts of the house by one of the few remaining craftsmen who know the technique. In the northwest room a wall has been left open to show the basic construction of the building. Note the huge hand hewn logs and the finely crafted corners. There is some question about the diagonal beams. Could they possibly have been the roof line of a one story house to which was later added a second floor? We have heard arguments both ways. Across the hall in the southeast room we are preparing an exhibit about the Jesuits from Regis College and their long association with the Cozens family and the ranch property. In 1905, a year after the death of William Zane, Mrs. Cozens and her children deeded the buildings and 80 acres to the Jesuits with the proviso that they would be cared for until their deaths. Later, more property was turned over and the area became a retreat for the Jesuits. In the 1950s a chapel for community use occupied the ground floor of this building. It necessitated the removal of two walls which have been replaced in the restoration. A fine new church, st. Bernards, was opened across the river in the spring of 1990. The story is often told of the group of Jesuits returning from a mountain vacation when they broke a wheel axle across the road from the Cozens Ranch house. Old Bill assisted them and was so impressed 3 by their good manners and general behavior that he told them to come back any time. They did and it was from that incident that the close relationship with the Jesuits began. Bill Cozens never joined the Catholic church but his family was extremely devout and appreciated the administrations of the fathers who regularly visited the area and said mass. A private chapel was built in the old tower which shows in the overall picture of the late 19th century buildings. There is a picture here of its interior. The carpet on the floor in the photo is the same as that found in the downstairs parlor. On route to the new church you pass on your left a shrine to the virgin and the graves of all the Cozens family and that of an infant whose parents worked for them. Next is a room devoted to the story of Doctor Susan Anderson, a well known figure in Grand County history. Hers is a fascinating story. The exhibit is essentially self-explanatory. The other two rooms up here are vacant for the time being, but will eventually contain new exhibits pertaining to various aspects of the Cozens Ranch and other local history. Now return to the "parlor". Here in the parlor we have used dry wall in the restoration as well as in the two adjoining rooms. Wall photos show family members: William Z., head of the family and a famous Sheriff in Central City before moving to this area; his wife, Mary York Cozens the shy, quiet, deeply religious wife and mother; Mary Elizabeth who appears to have been the most outgoing and motivated member of the family and who provided us with an 1887 dairy full of detailed information which has been priceless in learning what actually went on here at about that time. She was apparently the seamstress, laundress and gardener for the family while her sister, Sarah, appears to have done a lot of the cooking. Willie or Billy Jr. was as close as any member of the family came to being an intellectual. Educated at a Kansas boarding school there are many references to his numerous books and extensive reading. He was appointed justice of the peace about 1900 and served in that capacity for some years. There is little reference anyplace to what else he "did". He was not interested in ranching, apparently helped out here and there, often travelled to Georgetown on errands and in his later years was looked after -as per a 1905 agreement-by the Jesuits at Regis College in Denver to which he moved during the last few years of his life. One photo shows William Z. and his three brothers here at the ranch (A rare occasion that they were all together): Seated L to R, William and Nelson; standing L to R, Carlton and Clark. Interesting aside: the four Cozens brothers all adopted the middle initial "z" though all were baptized with different middle names. The reason is 4 unknown. Another photo taken on the porch shows Mr. and Mrs. Cozens flanked by their two daughters with son will standing behind. While still another shows surveyors passing through Cozens Ranch in 1902 following what is now u.s. Highway 40. There is a story that old Billy sat on his porch and shot out the stakes as fast as the R.R. surveyors put them in as they moved across his hay meadow. The next day the stakes were moved off the meadow and into the trees where the rail line runs to this day. The man haying in the picture is . thought to be Jack Sumner, brother-in-law of William N. Byers (founder of the Rocky Mountain News and promoter of Hot Sulphur Springs.) The mountain across the valley is named for Byers. The strip of carpet along the north wall was the latest one from the Cozens period. It had been placed on top of several layers of other carpets and had been covered by linoleum when the building was used as a chapel. When funds become available we hope to replicate the pattern and carpet the floor. You will note the sample of the wallpaper which covered these walls until the restoration was started. It had been hoped that the paper could be saved, but the plaster beneath was in such bad condition that it proved impossible. This is the same paper as you see on the east wall of the bedroom. We hope to be able to replicate this design and re-paper these walls some day. The parlor stove is not an original of the house but was brought into Grand County in the 1880s and is of the type probably used by the Cozens. The china cabinet writing desk is not original to the house either, but was also brought into the region in the late 1800s. The small bedroom at the end of the parlor is what we believe to have been Mrs. Cozens room, and probably Mr. Cozens, too. The small table to the left of the bedroom door was probably made by Cozens, himself. The wood and construction is almost identical to the larger table to be seen later in the stage stop room, the one with the 1878 stamp in the drawer. The hook board to the left has not been painted as it holds remnants of the very earliest wall paper and therefore is definitely from the earliest years of the building. Early references speak of the house as containing 2 bedrooms on this floor and this next room must have been one of them. However, when the post office addition was made it would have become quite public with the door opening directly to the P.o. We know from Mary Elizabeth Cozens' diary that they occasionally closed the big stage stop room in the winter but guests arrived year round so they may have been fed in this room. 5 There is very little to document the use of various rooms in the house. Mary Elizabeth mentions "Marna's Room" and her own room which she says contains "no more than a cot, a chair and a trunk". But which room was it? We hope to exhibit here, a scale model of the entire ranch complex at its peak about 1898. It, and a large relief map of the east end of Grand County will occupy most of the center of the room. Photos currently shown in plain mats will eventually be framed. Photos of wall paper samples found on the walls in various rooms are displayed throughout the downstairs. The actual pieces are too fragile to display until archival display cases can be obtained. The small Post Office room was built after the large stage stop room which will be viewed next. Cozens was appointed postmaster and the Fraser Post Office was established in 1876. The official appointment is on the wall as are appointments of other early postmasters in Grand County. We do not know whether there were post boxes or perhaps divided mail sacks like the one shown here from an early post office on the Williams Fork in West Grand County. The post office window located on a table in the center of the room is an original from Hot Sulphur Springs. We know that the stage stop served temporarily as the post office but in 1876 the front kitchen probably provided postal space for the earliest postal service. Apparently the "pass through" at the window was for postal use and the old mail slot was found during restoration. The nearby table is one we believe was built by Cozens for post office use. The notch in the corner fits the window and the interior of the drawer reveals an 1878 stamp mark. The long narrow photograph on the nearby wall is of this area around the turn of the century. The ox-yoke was found in the meadow across the road many, many years ago and is assumed to have been there during the Cozens years. In this room, meals were served to weary travelers and the Ranch was a regular stage stop on the run of the Georgetown -Middle Park express. We will eventually have suitable tables and benches. Mary Elizabeth writes in her diary about the various groups who dined and/or spent the night. Numbers ranged from six to twelve people, rarely more. Huge barns, long gone, provided shelter and feed for the horses. The large Alexander Grandview family. stove belonged to an early Grand Lake resident, Mrs. (Louise) Adams and may have been used in the old Resort. The "pie safe" is from a pioneer Grand County 6 The middle door as you face east led to a small porch at the side of which was a pump and spring. These had to be sacrificed to make way for lavatories in the restoration. The right hand door is a second rest room. The left hand door leads to what was the old "cool storage room". original storage bins remain, meat hooks on the ceiling beams suggest hanging elk and deer which were plentiful as well as beef which was raised throughout the Cozens ranching years. We know potatoes were raised here in large quantity and undoubtedly were stored in bins like these if not the very same. outdoors, roof lines of the various additions can be seen, also the open area through the trees that leads to the shrine and cemetery where all five members of the Cozens family who lived here are buried as is the infant of people who were Cozens' employees. A large series of barns stretched beyond the southern end of the yellow brick house to the south and on the north side of the house, in the ell, there was a large vegetable garden. There are photos also of the small building called the "ice house" in various references. From there, ice was brought in in the summer for use in the "cool storage" room. The small log cabin directly across the river may be one built by Billy when he first moved to the Fraser River Valley. ," SELF GUIDED TOUR -COZENS RANCH RESTORATION Your tour starts in the original family kitchen. The dry sink, with its corner drain, dates from the Cozens period, while the stove is representative of that era. When extreme weather conditions closed the stage stop room, this kitchen probably served both guests and family. Heavy traffic caused extreme wear to the floor boards, not found in other rooms of the house it is clear that this was a public room at some time or other. Items exhibited here relate to William Cozens' career as sheriff of Gilpin county in the 1860's. As you move into the hallway and up the stairs note the colors found on the doors, floors and woodwork. These are all reproductions of the original colors that were found under layers of later paint, carpet and linoleum. The banisters are the only finished pieces of wood in the entire house, and are said to have been the work of a brother of William Cozens. The house, which was begun in 1874, was one of the earliest examples of lath and plaster construction in the valley. The display at the top of the stairs shows this construction and a religious token dated 1877 that was found just where you see it. The 6 unheated upstairs rooms served the numerous overnight guests who stopped here. They are of similar design, even to the doors that are cut too short. The reason for this is an interesting mystery. Exhibits in these rooms tell stories of people and activities that helped to shape the Fraser valley. Returning to the main floor, you enter the parlor and bedroom - beyond. These rooms are considered together since the wallpaper and carpet were laid in the same sequence. Various photographs and the diaries of one daughter provide us with much of the information we have on the Cozens family. The diary of Mary Elizabeth Cozens suggests that the bedroom was that of her mother, Mary Cozens. The size and shape of the dresser and bed were determined from shadows found on the wallpaper and from depressions in the floor. The room to the right may have served a number of functions. We have references to it as a dining-room and a bedroom. At present it exhibits photographs of the fraser valley in the 1880-1890's. Plans call for a large scale model of the entire ranch in 1898 and an equally large relief map of East Grand county, with landmarks highlighted. The Post Office was probably the last room to be constructed . It houses an exhibit of Grand county post offices in the late 1880's. A shadow over the exterior door is possible of a religious token now lost. Similar ones were found throughout the building. Page 1 The stage stop served as an earlier post office, with a mail slot in the wall and an oversized window sill where transactions could have taken place. The table (an original Cozens piece) has a post mark of "Frazer 1878" in the drawer. other original items include the dry sink, cabinet, storage bin, the saddle and branding iron owned by William Zane Cozens. A tiny medallion can be seen over the exterior door. The ghost marks on the walls and ceiling indicate partitions and shelves of a later period. The cold storage room is much as we found it except for the addi tion of the modern storage unit. The heavier bin along the inside wall probably held ice in the summer, as it contained numerous layers of newspaper and insulating paper. The other bin was possibly for vegetables. The door to the right of the storage room gave access to a small rear porch and spring which had to be sacrificed for lavatory space. The third door, also now a rest room, is a product of the restoration. A stroll around the exterior will allow the visitor to examine the various roof lines of additions to the earliest structure. Across the river to the east is the small cemetery where the entire Cozens family is buried. They left no direct descendants as none of the children married. Page 2 6. Function or Use Historic Func!io~s . (enter categories from instructions) DomestiC/sing] e Dwell jng Domestic/Hotel (Stage Stop) Goyernment/post Office , f' 7. DeSCription Architectural Classification (enter categories from instructions) Other/Western Vernacular Describe present and historic physical appearance. Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) Vacant/Not in Use Materials (enter categories from instructions) foundation __ -"S"-,t",,o,,-,n~e=--___________ _ walls ____ ..1lW .... o.."o.."dL-___________ _ roof ________ ~A~s~p~h~a~l~tL_ __________________ __ other ______________________ __ The Cozens Ranch House is a 1 and ~ story vernacular board and batten structure constructed in 1874. The house has a large stase stop additio~ to the rear and a small post office addition on the south elevation. The house was the focus of a ranch operation, stage stop and post office in Grand County, Colorado. The ranch is situated in the Fraser Valley, an area of open Itparks" or meadows surrounded by high mountains which lead into Middle Park. Around the ranch, Fraser Valley remains essentially undeveloped with the Winter Park Ski area 3~ miles south of the ranch house and the Fraser shopping center two miles to the north as the only major modern intrusive elements in the area. The ranch house sits 50-75 feet east of the historic wagon road, nowU. S. Righway 40, which winds its way through the valley. The Fraser River flows within ZOO feet of the rear of the house. The original ranch lands surrounding the Cozens Ranch House and Stage Stop are little changed from the time of lol,tlliam Cozens death in 1904. However, most of the outbuildings and structures associated with the ranch no longer exist. Photographs taken before the turn of the century show that the stage stop and ranch house were part of a substantial ranch complex fronting the road then as it is aligned today, as a prosperous grouping of barns and dwellings. All that remains of the ranch complex is the main house constructed in 1874 with its post office and stage stop additions constructed soon thereafter. (See photo 9 of 10.) Present structures near the ranch house are a house and several buildings across the Fraser River, including th.e remains of the purported original 1872 Cozens homestead log cabin. The house and stage stop are constructed of six inch thick planked logs and are faced On the exterior, probably at the time of construction, with vertical boards and battens. The post office and the privy addition are of vertical board con- struction and the east shed has a stone wall sunk two feet into the ground for a cold storage room. Foundations are native dry-laid stone. The 1874 ranch house features a rectangular plan with a front gable roof. A four- over-four double-hung window is placed in them!ddle of the front gable. A center doorway with a four-over-four window on each side compose the first floor facade. The northwest elevation has two windows, equally spaced, on the first floor, and as with the other original windows, have four-aver-four pane lights and a double- hung sash. All doors and windows in the building have plain surrounds and appear to be original. Typical of the rural character of the building is the one story ~ See continuation sheet 8. Statement of Significance Certifying official has considered the significance of this property in relation to other properties: D nationally [2g statewide D locally Applicable National Register Criteria [i] A IiU B ~ C Do Criteria Considerations (Exceptions) DAD B Dc DoD E D F D G Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) Architecture Transportation Exploration/Settlement Significant Person William Zane Cozens Period of Significance 1874-190 5 Cultural Affiliation N/A ArchltectlBuilder William Zane Cozens Significant Dates 187 4 ca, 1876 State significance of property, and justify criteria, criteria considerations, and areas and periods of significance noted above. The Cozens Ranch House and Stage Stop meets Criterion C for its architectural signifi- cance as one of the few remaining planked log buildings in Colorado and for the quality of its late nineteenth. century western vernacular classical architecture. The craftsmanship of its construction is exemplary. The building meets Criterion A for its association with the history of 19th century transportation and settlement in Grand County from 1874 to 1905. The building was an important stage stop on the road from Georgetown to Hot Sulphur Springs, serving from the first opening of the road over Berthoud Pass in 1874 until the coming of the railroad in 1905, when roadhouses associated with stage lines were no longer needed. The significance of the building is enhanced by the local fame of its owner and builder, William Zane Cozens: ex-sheriff of Central City, early homesteader of the Fraser Valley, post- master and stage stop host. With this significant association the ranch house meets Criterion R. The Cozens Ranch House and Stage Stop is significant for its association with William Z. Cozens, an important pioneer in the history of Fraser Valley. Cozens was one of the earliest settlers in the valley and contrifiuted to the area's development. William Zane Cozens and Mary York Cozens crossed the divide from Central City to the east and homesteaded 160 acres on the Fraser in 1812, and in 1814 built the house which stands today, essentially unaltered. William Zane Cozens was born in Canada in 1830, raised in New York, apprenticed as a carpenter there, and joined the rush to the Gregory diggings in 1859 for Colorado gold. Little is recorded as to his fortune or lack of it, other than in deeds of land transfer, but he has found fame in later years as Central City's sheriff. Appointed deputy sheri;ff soon after his a~rival, William, better known as Billy, was appointed chief deputy sheriff of Gilpin Couhty in 1861. Cozens assumed the office of sheriff in 1862 when the elected sheriff resigned. He completed the term, gained election in his own right, then held the office for six years. [j] See continuation sheet 9. Major Bibliographical References Black, Robert C.Island in the Rockies, The History of Grand County to 1930. Hot Sulphur Springs, co: Grand County Pioneer Society, 1969 Hall, Frank,.History of the State of Colorado. Vol. IV. Chicago: Blakely Printing Co., 1895. Hall, Frank, ''W. Z. Cozens, Pioneer Fighter, Passes Away." Denver Post, January 18, 1904. Strum, Mayme G. "Mary York (Cozens), Pioneer Woman in Gregory Diggings." May 1945. McQueary, Lela, Widening Trails. Denver: By the author, 1962. Previous documentation on file (NPS): o preliminary determination 9f~ individ!Jal.lis~ing (36 PFR 67) I)a!! ~en requested " . ,_ o previously listed in the National Register o previously determined eligible by the Nationa l Register D designated a National Historic landmark D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey * i,' o recorded by Historic American Engineering Record * ________________ _ 10. Geographical Data o See continuation sheet Primary location of additionaH:~~tl!::·. D State historjc preservat.i~n GffiC~ o Other State agency o Federal agency o local government o University [i]Other Specify repository : Grand County Historical Association Acreage of property _ .... l..s;e;.;:s...,s ......... t .... b""a ... n .......... o .... n ... e"--'a ... c ... rue __________________________ _ UTM References A ~ 1413121419101 Zone Easting C LLJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Verbal Boundary Description 141412101313101 Northing 1 1 1 1 B LLJ 1 1 1 1 Zone Easting DLLJ 1 1 1 1 D See continuation sheet 1 1 1 1 Northing 1 1 1 A parcel of land located in the~, Section 28, Township 1 South Range 75 West of the 6th P.M., Grand County, Colorado. See continuation sheet for complete legal description. ~ See continuation sheet Boundary Justification . Boundary incorporates the land owned by the Grand County Historical Association. See attached survey map. o See continuation sheet 11. Form Prepared By nameltitle Regina M, Rl ::Irk organization . Grand County Historical Association date (J03U25-3939 Hot Su~pht street & number __ Bl).oox~..I.1.c6~5----------------telephone Denver (303) 722-2226 pg~ city or town Bot S11J pb11 r Springs state co zip code 80451 Wm. Z. COzens Ranch House Grand County,CO. Photographer: Paul Gilbert Locale of Negative: Grand County Museum Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs. CO. 80451 Date of photo: January, 1986 f·hoto 1 of" Ii) V!E:W t.Ot)./(.I N G EA sr Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House Grand County, co. Photographer; Unknown Locale of negative; Grand County Museum Box 167, Hot Sulphur Springs, CO. 80451 Date of photo: c. 1885 Photo 2 of ~ View looking East Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House Grand County, co. Photographer; Paul Gilbert Location of negative: Grand County Museum Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs. CO. 80451 Date of photo: January 1986 Photo of 3 of , to View looking Northeast Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House Grand County, CO. Photographer: Paul Gilbert Locale of negative: Grand County Museum Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs. CO. 80451 Date of photo: January 1986 Photo4 of , 10 View looking North/northeast Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House with Georgetown- Middle Park Mail coach. Grand County, CO. Photographer: Paul Gilbert Locale of negative: Grand County Museum, Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs. CO. 80451 Date of photo: c.1880 Photo 5 of' /0 View looking North Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House Grand County, CO. Photographer: Paul Gilbert Locale of Negative: Grand County Museum Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs. CO. 80451 Date of Photo: January, 1986 Photo 6ofl i O View looking North Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House Grand County,CO. Photographer; Paul Gilbert Locale of Negative: Grand County Museum Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs.,CO. 80451 Date of photo: January, 1986 Photo 7 of .~ 10 View looking West Wm. Z. Cozens Ranch House Grand County, CO. Photographer: Robert C. Black III Locale of Negative: Grand County Museum, Box 167, Hot Sulphur Spgs., CO. 80451 Date of photo: January, 1986 Photo 8 of i l0 View looking East, showing nearest buildings Colorado Historical Society - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Compass: Colorado's On-line Cultural Resource Database | Read Me! | Credits | Logoff | | Searches | Prehistoric Archaeology | Historical Archaeology | Architectural | Paleontological | All Sites | | Chronometry | Radiocarbon | Tree-Ring | Historic Archaeology Site Detail Search List |< < > >| Site ID: 5GA.4389 Map Name: WINTER PARK HISTORICAL MARKER *** Street Address(s) *** County: Grand Resource Type: Historical Archaeology Assessment Date Description 02/26/2014 No assessment given on form Recorder Date Description 02/26/2014 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (OAHP) Condition Date Description Images No Images Absolute Date Method Comments Related Sites No Related Sites *** Document(s) *** *** ARCHITECTURE *** *** ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA *** Site Type HISTORIC, ISOLATED FEATURE Culture HISTORIC - OTHER Feature(s) Cnt Description 1 MARKER Artifact(s) Cnt Description *** RADIO CARBON DATA *** *** LOCATION INFORMATION *** Map Principal Meridian Township Range Section Quarters FRASER 6TH 1S 75W 28 SW NW UTM Zone:Easting Northing 13:4 32 426mE 44 20 551mN 0 0 p Grand Park The Willows Site Plan '--�-, -1\!)- __fj_ -c:::,- (J 0 0 'il I 0 � ◊ 0 0 -I --� � "-'"---"--,'--,,,,:--_ -=�-�w0---..--�-�-�..:.,_ ..... .__._"""' __ l:\ __ 1--�-----------�---:.--.,,:;.--1,-.:..-....... --t�ro�ino ID200 �2r� 9ve�te A314 Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 Scale: l "= 60'-0" 0 0 N April 26, 2019 From:WQ Records Center - CDPHE, CDPHE To:Roye, Jovianne Subject:Re: DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Date:Tuesday, November 5, 2019 3:55:04 PM Attachments:image001.png image.png Hello Jovianne, I have searched the Water Quality Control Division databases and have not identified responsive documents associated with the location provided. Thanks, Frank Frank Dale Records Manager Business Services Unit P 303.692.3565 | F 303.782.0390 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246 cdphe.wqrecordscenter@state.co.us | www.colorado.gov/cdphe/wqcd Online Records: https://environmentalrecords.colorado.gov/HPRMWebDrawer/Search On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 12:42 PM Roye, Jovianne <jroye@partneresi.com> wrote: Good Afternoon Frank, The coordinates for the site is 39.931487, -105.795093. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895 More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here From: WQ Records Center - CDPHE, CDPHE [mailto:cdphe.wqrecordscenter@state.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 11:41 AM To: Roye, Jovianne <jroye@partneresi.com> Subject: Re: DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Hi Jovianne, Do you have any coordinates for the land? I am unable to locate our possible records without an address or coordinates. Thanks, Frank Frank Dale Records Manager Business Services Unit P 303.692.3565 | F 303.782.0390 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, CO 80246 cdphe.wqrecordscenter@state.co.us | www.colorado.gov/cdphe/wqcd Online Records: https://environmentalrecords.colorado.gov/HPRMWebDrawer/Search On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:20 AM Monica Wilkerson <monica.wilkerson@state.co.us> wrote: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Roye, Jovianne <jroye@partneresi.com> Date: Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:30 AM Subject: DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST To: cdphe.recordsrequests@state.co.us <cdphe.recordsrequests@state.co.us> DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above-referenced property pertaining to the following: Current or historical use of hazardous materials and/or hazardous waste Groundwater monitoring wells Current or historical clarifiers, oil/water separators, grease traps, interceptors Incidents of lead or asbestos, fires, leaks [USTs/ASTs] and spills Code Violations or Notices to Comply Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. Please forward any records that exist for the aforementioned property or any other pertinent information, at your earliest convenience. Also, please notify Partner if there are any costs associated with this request prior to processing. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895 More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here From:Fisher - CDPS, Caley To:Roye, Jovianne Subject:Re: State Fire Violations/Records Request Date:Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:10:22 PM We do not appear to have any information in regards to this location. V/r, Caley Fisher Public Information Officer caley.fisher@state.co.us | 720.391.1565 colorado.gov/dfpc Our mission is to provide leadership and support to Colorado communities in reducing threats to lives, property, and the environment from fire. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:30 AM Roye, Jovianne <jroye@partneresi.com> wrote: Good Morning, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above-referenced property pertaining to the following: Records pertaining to underground and above ground storage tanks Hazardous materials incidents Inspection records Any outstanding violations We are especially looking to learn if there are any open fire code violations and to obtain the results of the last inspection by the fire department. If there are no open fire code violations, please include the statement: There are No open fire code violations for this property. Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. Please forward any records that exist for the aforementioned property or any other pertinent information, at your earliest convenience. Also, please notify Partner if there are any costs associated with this request prior to processing. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARTNER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, INC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895 More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here From:Antoinette McVeigh To:Roye, Jovianne Subject:CORA Request Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:40:24 PM Attachments:2019 CORA Request Roye.pdf Jovianne,   The CORA request you made is attached to this email. Please note that it states there is an attachment, however it is at the bottom of the attachment.   Thank you,   Antoinette McVeigh Town Clerk Town of Fraser 153 Fraser Avenue, P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 80442 Phone: 970-726-5491 x201 Fax: 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system.     Please be advised that as you have stated, this is undeveloped, vacant land in the Town of Fraser and is located within the Grand Park Planned Development District. The Town of Fraser has not yet received any development applications for said property. The current zoning and approved entitlements are of public record per the document recorded at Reception 2005012709 and is attached to this email. The records you have requested do not exist therefore can not be provided. However we have provided the current zoning and entitlements Grand Park Planned Development District. From:Roye, Jovianne To:rdavis@co.grand.co.us Subject:Environmental Health Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 2:15:00 PM Attachments:19-246019.2 Environmental Health Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park.pdf Good Afternoon, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 Attached is a completed records request form for the property listed above. Please let me know if I have reached the right department. If any more information is needed from our company in regards to the completion of this request, please contact me at 410-390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 443-377-3895 or send via e-mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895  More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here October 30, 2019 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore MD 21204 ◊ Phone 410-390-4899 ◊ Fax 443-377-3895 October 30, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following properties: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above- referenced property pertaining to the following: •Asbestos or lead-based paint found at the property •Septic system and water well information •Human health concerns •Hazardous materials incidents •Regional specific issues Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. If any more information is needed from our company regarding the completion of this request, please contact me at 410-390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 410-390-4899 or send via e- mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Sincerely, Jovianne Roye Process Specialist - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 2013 TP, Fraser, 2013, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 From:Roye, Jovianne To:cdphe.recordsrequests@state.co.us Subject:DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:30:00 PM DEQ VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST   Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2   As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above- referenced property pertaining to the following: Current or historical use of hazardous materials and/or hazardous waste Groundwater monitoring wells Current or historical clarifiers, oil/water separators, grease traps, interceptors Incidents of lead or asbestos, fires, leaks [USTs/ASTs] and spills Code Violations or Notices to Comply Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. Please forward any records that exist for the aforementioned property or any other pertinent information, at your earliest convenience. Also, please notify Partner if there are any costs associated with this request prior to processing. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895   More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here From:Roye, Jovianne To:caley.fisher@state.co.us Subject:State Fire Violations/Records Request Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:30:00 PM Good Morning, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting informally any and all records you have for the above- referenced property pertaining to the following:   Records pertaining to underground and above ground storage tanks Hazardous materials incidents Inspection records Any outstanding violations We are especially looking to learn if there are any open fire code violations and to obtain the results of the last inspection by the fire department. If there are no open fire code violations, please include the statement: There are No open fire code violations for this property.   Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. Please forward any records that exist for the aforementioned property or any other pertinent information, at your earliest convenience. Also, please notify Partner if there are any costs associated with this request prior to processing. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895   More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here From:Roye, Jovianne To:amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us Subject:Open Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park Date:Wednesday, October 30, 2019 1:29:00 PM Attachments:19-246019.2 Open Records Request - Willows Apartments at Grand Park.pdf Good Afternoon, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 Attached is a completed records request form for the property listed above. If any more information is needed from our company in regards to the completion of this request, please contact me at 410- 390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 443-377-3895 or send via e-mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Thank You, Ms. Jovianne Roye Process Specialist PARtNeR eNGiNeeRiNG ANd SCieNCe, iNC. 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore, MD 21204 T: 410-390-4899 | F: 443-377-3895   More Than Just Assessments. Solutions – For a complete list of services, click here 5 PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST PLEASE PRINT Name: Date of Request: Address: Town: State: Zip: Phone: Day Evening Email: INSTRUCTIONS Indicate the information you desire and/or list each requested document. Please be as specific as possible. Allow three (3) working days for a search of the records. Per the State of Colorado Open Records Act (C.R.S. 24-72-203), if the request is substantially large or is maintained off-site, an extension of seven (7) working days is permitted. You will be notified within three (3) days of any extension and all estimated costs. Please select the format in which you would like to receive materials: View only, no copies requested. Appropriate personnel will be scheduled to accompany you during viewing. Hard copies/printouts CD* email* *not all documents are available electronically. Data manipulation fees may apply. Please select the method you prefer for notification when the records are available: U.S. First Class mail I will pick up the records. Contact me by (circle one) mail phone email email (if records are available electronically) If records are not available by email, please specify an alternate method: _____________________________________ =================================================================== Jovianne Roye October 30, 2019 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301 Baltimore MD 21204 410-390-4899 jroye@partneresi.com Please see attachment below for records requested. mail 6 For Staff Use Only Received by:Date/Time: Estimated charges: Hard Copy:Copies @ 25 cents per page CD:Copies @ $20.00 each Other: Retrieval and Research:hours X $per hour = $total Deposit required: $ 100% of the estimated total, if in excess of $10.00 ============================================================== I agree to pay the charges incurred in processing this request pursuant to the schedule of fees and charges currently in place, including, if necessary, any amounts exceeding the estimates set forth above. This request will be considered received when this form is complete and the deposit is paid. If no deposit is required, the request shall be considered received upon receipt by the Records Custodian. Signature of requestor Date and time of request ====================================================================== Request completed by:Date: Method of delivery: ====================================================================== Request denied by:Date: Reason(s) for denial: 10/30/2019 1:30pm 8422 Bellona Lane, Suite 301, Baltimore MD 21204 ◊ Phone 410-390-4899 ◊ Fax 443-377-3895 October 30, 2019 VIOLATIONS/RECORDS REQUEST Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. is conducting a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and/or a Property Condition Report Assessment on the following property: Undeveloped Land identified as Willows Apartments at Grand Park Old Victory Road Parcel No. 158729400155 Fraser, CO 80442 Partner Project Number: 19-246019.2 As part of the investigation, we are requesting any zoning, building, fire, or environmental health records you have for the above-referenced property pertaining to the following: •current zoning designation, if the current use is permitted, and conditional uses (if any) If there are no open zoning code violations, please include the statement: There are No open zoning code violations for this property. •any unresolved notices of violation/to comply, date of last inspection by the building department, copies of any open building department permits, copies of certificates of occupancy, copies of permits and records for any current or historic storage tanks If there are no open building code violations, please include the statement: There are No open building code violations for this property. •hazardous materials incidents, fire inspection records, outstanding fire code violations -- We are especially looking to learn if there are any open fire code violations and to obtain the results of the last inspection by the fire department. If there are no open fire code violations, please include the statement: There are No open fire code violations for this property. •records of asbestos or lead-based paint, septic system and water well information, human health concerns Thank you for your time and effort in completing the above request for information. If any more information is needed from our company regarding the completion of this request, please contact me at 410-390-4899. Please fax this request and any additional information to me at 410-390-4899 or send via e-mail to jroye@partneresi.com. Sincerely, Jovianne Roye Process Specialist - APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Key: Subject Property Topographic Map Year: 2013 TP, Fraser, 2013, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5848061 4 APPENDIX D: QUALIFICATIONS 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Thomas A. Davis Project Assessor Education B.S., Environmental Geology, University of Dayton Graduate Certificate, Geospatial Information Systems, University of Dayton Registrations Asbestos Building Inspector Certification – State of Colorado, 2019 Air Monitoring Specialist Certification – State of Colorado, 2018 Training Asbestos Building Inspector / Asbestos Management Planner Initial – July 2016 (Refresher – August 2018) OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 40-Hour HAZWOPER – April 2015 (8-Hour Refresher – April 15, 2019) Adult & Child CPR & AED / Standard First Aid – May 16, 2019 SafeLand, Environmental Health & Safety Training for Onshore Energy & Production Highlights 4 years of experience in environmental due diligence consulting: Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) Property Condition Assessments (PCAs) Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Survey and Abatement Oversight Experience Summary Mr. Davis serves as a Project Assessor for Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) where his job responsibilities include client contact, Phase I ESA and reconnaissance, historical data review and analysis, agency contact and research, Phase II ESA recommendations, and report preparation. Mr. Davis brings over four years of environmental consulting experience focused on industrial and commercial real estate transactional due diligence, regulatory compliance and subsurface characterization. Mr. Davis began his career as an Environmental Scientist, conducting Phase I ESA, PCAs and Phase II ESA throughout the United States. His due diligence resume includes experience in soil, groundwater, and soil gas contamination investigations, and the identification of asbestos and PCB contamination. Mr. Davis has also performed per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) groundwater contamination investigations and asbestos in soil excavation oversight. Prior to joining Partner, Mr. Davis worked at a national due diligence firm, performing Phase I ESAs, PCAs, Phase II ESAs and overseeing property management. Project Experience Phase I/II ESAs Crane Yard Portfolio, Texas and Louisiana. Completed combined Phase I ESA and PCA assessments at four crane yard properties in the Houston metro area. Brick Manufacturer, Castle Rock, Colorado. Completed combined Phase I ESA and Phase II ESA assessments at a former brick manufacturing plant in Colorado. Thomas A. Davis 2 | P a g e Asbestos Former Rubber Plant, Denver, Colorado. Oversaw excavation activities and sampled suspected asbestos containing materials at a former rubber plant. Contact tdavis@partneresi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Adam Wywrocki Staff Assessor Education Master of Science in Mining and Geology, AGH University of Science and Technology Cracow 2016 Bachelor of Science in Oil and Gas Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology Cracow 2015 Experience Summary Mr. Wywrocki is a staff assessor with Partner Engineering and Science (Partner) and is knowledgeable in numerous types of environmental due diligence reports. He is accountable for conducting independent project research as applicable to scope of work (historical, analytical, etc.), data compilation and organization, conducting site reconnaissance, including sampling activities in line with a number of reporting standards, including ASTM standards, EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), and customized client formats. Mr. Wywrocki’s responsibilities include completing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Transaction Screen Assessments, Environmental Desktop Reports and Peer Reviews for an array of commercial, multi - family, industrial and municipal properties throughout Europe. Contact awywrocki@partneresi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Michael J. Lawlor, Jr. Senior Assessor Education B.Sc. Meteorology, Penn State, University Park, PA M.Sc. Geography and Global Sustainability, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT Registrations Asbestos Inspector – State of Connecticut License #799 Asbestos Inspector – State of New York License #15-00518 Residential Measurement Provider – National Radon Proficiency Program #108092RT Radon Inspector – State of Rhode Island License #RMC-158 Training OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety and Health Certification, March 2012 OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Certification, November 2006 OSHA 8-Hour HAZWOPER Annual Refresher, January 2019 TSCA 24-Hour Asbestos Inspector Training, February 2012 Highlights 12 years in the environmental investigation and remediation industry 8 years of experience performing due diligence assessments 6 years of experience performing asbestos inspections and sampling 4 years of experience performing radon surveys and assessments Experience Summary Mr. Lawlor currently holds the role of a Senior Assessor and has significant experience in due diligence assessments for a variety of property types and the needs and requirements of varied number of reporting standards, including ASTM standards, EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), customized client formats, and fulfilling the requirements set forth by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Specifically, Mr. Lawlor has performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Environmental Transaction Screens, Phase II and III Subsurface Investigations, Property Condition Assessments (PCAs), Small Loan PCAs, Regulatory Compliance Assessments, Asbestos Surveys, Radon Studies, and Lead-in-water sampling and analysis. Mr. Lawlor has served as project staff performing field activities in a variety of roles and responsibilities. Duties on projects involving soil and groundwater investigation include oversight of soil boring and monitoring well installations, categorizing and collection of soil samples, collection of groundwater samples for analyses, and reporting results to clients and regulatory agencies. Mr. Lawlor also has performed operations and maintenance to soil vapor extraction and groundwater tr eatment systems as part of on- going remediation activities at landfills and gasoline service stations. As a licensed asbestos inspector in Connecticut and New York he has performed asbestos inspections in accordance with Connecticut and New York Department of Public Health, OSHA, and USEPA regulations pertaining to the sampling of asbestos. Finally, Mr. Lawlor’s diversity across residential, industrial, municipal, and commercial environments is a major contribution to Partner Engineering and Science’s team in the Northeast, region of the United States. Michael J. Lawlor, Jr. 2 | P a g e Project Experience HUD Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Radon Survey, Upstate New York. Mr. Lawlor served as a project assessor for joint environmental site assessment and radon surveys for a portfolio of five residential apartment complexes located in Syracuse and Watertown, New York. On-site inspections included the deployment of radon canisters in 25% of ground floor units, 10% of upper floor units, and one canister per floor in each building, with each apartment complex containing nearly thirty separate residential buildings. Phase I and II Transfer Act Site Assessments, Wallingford, Connecticut. Mr. Lawlor served as the project assessor for the investigation of a plating facility in Wallingford, Connecticut which met the definition of an “establishment” as defined by the Connecticut Transfer Act. During two subsurface investigation events Mr. Lawlor oversaw the installation of fifty-three soil borings and fifteen monitoring wells in order to properly investigate and delineate subsurface conditions at the subject property. 150 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Northeast U.S . Mr. Lawlor served as the lead field inspector and report writer for a portfolio of 150 Phase I Environmental Site Assessments located in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island for the sale of gasoline service stations. Inspection duties included meeting with the client at each station, performing a site inspection to document current site conditions including gasoline USTs and associated site features, as well as historical research at town halls and state regulatory offices. Soil and Groundwater Remediation, Bennington, Vermont. Mr. Lawlor served as the lead field staff for a construction project in Vermont which included soil and groundwater remediation at a former gasoline service station. Mr. Lawlor field-screened soils removed during construction and ensured impacted soils were segregated on-site and provided oversight when impacted soils were removed for off-site disposal. Additionally, Mr. Lawlor managed an activated-carbon groundwater treatment system, which included the pumping of water from frac tanks, treatment through sock filters and activated carbon, and discharge to a municipal sewer system. HUD Phase I, Asbestos, Radon, and Lead in Water Sampling, Waterbury, Connecticut. Mr. Lawlor performed multiple scopes of work at a senior housing apartment building in Connecti cut. Over the course of three site visits, Mr. Lawlor performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment inspection, radon sampling, collection of 155 bulk samples for asbestos, and collection of 15 drinking water samples for lead. Affiliations Member, Environmental Professional Organization of Connecticut (EPOC) Publications Case Study Analysis of the Attributes of Walkability, Journal of Sustainable Mobility, December 2015. A review of common attributes to walkable cities and which cities have successf ully implemented walkability into their urban planning. Contact mlawlor@partneresi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Scott Chiu National Client Manager Education B.S., Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences; Aquatic Track, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO. Highlights 7 years of experience performing environmental due diligence assessments 7 years of experience performing environmental assessments for agencies such as HUD, Fannie Mae, SBA 5 years of completing Capital Needs Assessments 4 years of experience performing specialized scope assessments for the oil and gas industry 2 years of experience working alongside the Missouri Department of Conservation and United States Fish and Wildlife Service Experience Summary Mr. Chiu is a National Client Manager for Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner). In his role of National Client Manager, Mr. Chiu is responsible for the origination, management of the execution of environmental and engineering due diligence services provided by Partner . Mr. Chiu’s responsibilities as a National Client Manager also include reviewing Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA) and Capital Needs Assessments (CNA), and includes supervision of in-house and contracted staff, overall responsibility of project scope/design, and the project and task implementation/execution. Mr. Chiu has extensive experience managing all aspects of due diligence, specializing in United States Department of Housing and Development (HUD) environmental and engineering due diligence for HUD MAP approved lenders. Mr. Chiu’s due diligence resume includes experience at all levels, advising lenders and real estate investors through the following product types: • Capital Needs Assessments • HUD Noise Analysis Studies • HUD E-Tool Assessments • Cultural Resource Studies • Phase I Environmental Site Assessments • EnergyStar Benchmarking • HUD HEROS Assessments • Energy Audits • Phase II Subsurface Investigations • Radon Assessments • Architectural, Engineering and Cost Reviews • Lead-based Paint Assessments • Remedial Cost Design and Implementation • Asbestos Assessments Project Management Prior to working as a National Client Manager, Mr. Chiu managed and reviewed projects for multiple National Client Managers. Clients served include equity-level investors, national and regional banks, life insurance companies, mortgage lending agencies , tax-credit developers and non-profit organizations. Mr. Chiu’s daily responsibilities include identifying qualified assessors for various projects, reviewing ESA and CNA reports, and managing site-specific questions clients may have during the course of an assessment. Additionally, Mr. Chiu is responsible for managing project budgets and maintaining profitability for multiple National Client Managers. Field Work Prior to working as a Project Manager, Mr. Chiu completed over 1,000 projects located throughout Texas as well as 17 other states in the country. Mr. Chiu worked closely with state and local regulatory agencies Scott Chiu 2 | P a g e to obtain environmentally significant documents regarding tank removal and subsurface in vestigations performed onsite. Mr. Chiu has worked for large financial institutions as well as private investors and has also performed work for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fannie Mae, and Small Business Administration. Project Experience HUD MAP 223(f) Lakeside Oaks at Old Dutchtown, Gonzales, LA. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the refinance of 252-unit apartment complex constructed in 2005. Scopes of work included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Capital Needs Assessment, and Statement of Energy Performance. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Residence at Lake Jackson, Lake Jackson, TX. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the refinance of 248-unit apartment complex constructed in 2009 and 2013. Scopes of work included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Capital Needs Assessment. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Muir Lake Apartments, Cedar Park, TX. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the refinance of 332- unit apartment complex situated on 40 -acres constructed in 2013. Scopes of work included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Capital Needs Assessment. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Gleneagles Apartments, Lexington, KY. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the refinance of 184- unit apartment complex constructed in 2005. Scopes of work included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Capital Needs Assessment, and Radon Screening. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. HUD MAP 221(d)(4) Oakwood Flats, Nashville, TN . Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for a proposed 270-unit multi-family development. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Majestic on McKinney, McKinney, TX. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for a proposed 221-unit multi-family development. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Valencia Hills, Santa Teresa, NM. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for a proposed 221-unit multi-family development. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Highpoint Town Square, Romeoville, IL. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for a proposed 72-unit multi-family development. All work was done in accordance with the HUD MAP Guide. Scott Chiu 3 | P a g e HUD LEAN 223/232(f) Country Gardens, Muskogee, OK. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Capital Needs Assessment, and Radon Screening on the refinance of 57 -bed assisted living facility constructed in 1996. All work was done in accordance with the HUD LEAN Handbook. Jasmin Terrace, Pasadena, CA. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Capital Needs Assessment, Asbestos Screening, Seismic Evaluation, and Radon Screening on the refinance of 143-bed assisted living facility constructed in 1977. All work was done in accordance with the HUD LEAN Handbook. Autumn Hills Care Center, Niles, OH. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Capital Needs Assessment, and Radon Screening on the refinance of 151 -bed skilled nursing and assisted living facility constructed in 1986. All work was done in accordance with the HUD LEAN Handbook. Sorrento in San Antonio, San Antonio, TX. Mr. Chiu served as the primary consultant on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Capital Needs Assessment, and Radon Screening on the refinance of 120 - bed skilled nursing and assisted living facility constructed in 2014. All work was done in accord ance with the HUD LEAN Handbook. Tax Credit Woodlake Apartments, Orlando, FL. Florida Housing and Finance Corporation. Scopes of work included Project Cost Analysis and Construction Progress Monitoring inspections. Timberwood Trace, Jacksonville, FL. Florida Housing and Finance Corporation. Scopes of work included Project Cost Analysis and Construction Progress Monitoring inspections. St. John’s Seminary, San Antonio, TX. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. Scopes of work included a Capital Needs Assessment and Construction Progress Monitoring inspections. Merritt Homes, McKinney, TX. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. Scopes of work included a Capital Needs Assessment. Casa Brendan Apartments, Stephenville, TX. Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs. Scopes of work included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, ALTA Survey, Asbestos Screening and Radon Screening. Equity Office Towers, Honolulu, HI. Mr. Chiu performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessments on four landmark office towers in downtown Honolulu, Hawaii as part of an acquisition for an equity client. The assessments occurred over the course of four days, and included daily briefings and d e-briefings with the client. Scott Chiu 4 | P a g e Historic Office Building, Bentonville, AR. Mr. Chiu performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and a Property Condition Assessment on a historic office building in downtown Bentonville, Arkansas that is home to the original retail location of a large, multi-national retail chain. Golf Course Portfolio, Grapevine and Mansfield, TX. Mr. Chiu performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessments on two semi-private golf courses as part of an acquisition for an equity clien t. Oil and Gas Industry Oil and Gas Exploration Yards, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and New Mexico. Mr. Chiu has performed numerous NORM surveys, Phase I Environmental Assessments and Exit Audits for oil and gas exploration properties that include fracking equipment, active and decommissioned wells, machine maintenance, and bulk fuel storage. Decommissioned Natural Gas Extraction Plant, Andrews, TX. Mr. Chiu performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on a former natural gas extraction plant for a p otential purchaser seeking to identify environmental risk associated with the acquisition of the property. Saltwater Injection Wells, Various Sites, TX. Mr. Chiu performed Phase I Environmental Site Assessments on numerous saltwater injection wells across the state of Texas for an oil and gas exploration service company. Affiliations North Texas Commercial Association of Realtors and Real Estate Professional, Young Professional Forum National Association for Industrial and Office Parks, Developing Leaders Contact schiu@partneresi.com E • MUHMEL I N C O R P O R A T E D SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK FRASER,COLORADO Prepared For: Grand Park Development, LLC. PO Box 30 Winter Park, CO Attention: Clark Lipscomb Project No. SU01277.002-120-R1 May 24, 2021 1790 Airport Road, Unit 2, PO Box 4928, Breckenridge, Colorado 80424 Telephone:970-453-2047 www.ct[thompson.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE............................................................................................................................................. 1 SUMMARYOF CONCLUSIONS..................................................................................................... 1 SITECONDITIONS......................................................................................................................... 2 PROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION...................................................................................................... 2 SUBSURFACECONDITIONS........................................................................................................ 3 GEOLOGY....................................................................................................................................... 4 SITEEARTHWORK........................................................................................................................ 4 StructuralFill.............................................................................................................................. 5 FOUNDATIONS............................................................................................................................... 5 SLABS-ON-GRADE........................................................................................................................ 6 FOUNDATIONWALLS................................................................................................................... 8 FoundationWall Backfill........................................................................................................... 9 SUBSURFACEDRAINAGE............................................................................................................ 9 SURFACEDRAINAGE.................................................................................................................10 CONCRETE...................................................................................................................................11 PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS............................................................................................11 Subgrade Preparation, Structural Fill, and Aggregate Base Course..................................13 AsphaltPavement....................................................................................................................14 ConcretePavement..................................................................................................................14 Surface Drainage in Paved Areas...........................................................................................15 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS............................................................................................15 GEOTECHNICALRISK.................................................................................................................16 RADON..........................................................................................................................................16 LIMITATIONS................................................................................................................................17 FIGURE 1 —VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 — LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURES 3 & 4 — SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 5 — SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURES 6, 7, 8 & 9 — GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I — LABORATORY TEST RESULTS GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\khalla\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\jwYoyTmclEqu0Y56FjCSGQ==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx SCOPE This report presents the results of our Soils and Foundation Investigation for the Willow Apartments, Phase II-72 Units, between Mountain Willow Drive and American Willow Drive, Willows at Grand Park in Fraser, Colorado. We conducted this investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotech- nical engineering recommendations for the proposed new development. The new development will include five multi -unit apartment buildings, four detached garages, and new asphalt pavement for access roads and parking. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, engineering analysis, and experi- ence. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions observed in seven exploratory pits and presents geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of the residence foundations, floor systems, and details in- fluenced by the subsoils. We have previously provided a Soils and Foundation In- vestigation for the Willow Apartments, Phase 1-132 Units (Project No. SU01277.001- 120-R1, dated March 8, 2021). The scope was described in a Service Agreement SU-21-0015) dated February 1, 2021. Recommendations contained in this report were developed based on our un- derstanding of the planned construction. If plans differ significantly from the descrip- tions contained in the report, we should be informed so that we determine whether our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary of our conclu- sions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS Subsurface conditions observed in the exploratory pits consisted of about 6 to 18 inches of "topsoil' underlain primarily by sand and gravel. The maximum depth explored was 10 feet. Water seepage was ob- served in TP-2 at a depth of 9 feet. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbakerWppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btIg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx 2. We anticipate that excavations for the new development will result in natural sand and gravel being the predominant soil at anticipated foun- dation elevations. The buildings can be constructed on footing founda- tions supported by the undisturbed, natural soils. Design and construc- tion criteria are presented in the report. It is critical that we observe the excavation to check whether conditions are as anticipated, prior to placing footings. 3. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the buildings. 4. The design and construction criteria for foundations and floor systems in this report were compiled with the expectation that all other recom- mendations presented related to surface and subsurface drainage, landscaping irrigation, backfill compaction, etc. will be incorporated into the project and that the owners will maintain the structure, use prudent irrigation practices and maintain surface drainage. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed. SITE CONDITIONS The site is located near Fraser, CO on the northeast side of Old Victory Road as shown on Figure 1. The site was covered with 1 to 2 feet of snow at the time of our exploration. The property is bordered by Mountain Willow Drive to the north and Old Victory Road to the south. Existing townhomes are located to the north of the site. The ground surface across the site slopes gently down to the northeast. Vege- tation consists mostly of grasses and brush with pockets of coniferous trees. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed construction will include five multi -unit apartment buildings and four detached garages. Access roads and parking areas will require new asphalt pavement. We assume concrete curbs, gutters, and drive -pans will be provided. The proposed apartment buildings will be three-story structures. There are two types of apartment buildings; Building Type 1 will have 24 units and Building Type 2 GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 2 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Agu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx will have 12 units. All proposed buildings will be slab -on -grade. Wood frame con- struction will be used above grade with cast -in -place concrete foundation walls be- low grade. Required excavations are not expected to exceed 4 feet for foundations. Foundation loads are expected to be about 1,000 to 3,000 pounds per linear foot of foundation wall, with maximum column loads of 40 kips or less. Overlot grading to level the building pads and create roadways/parking areas will likely include cuts and fills of around 4 feet. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by observing seven exploratory pits excavated at the approximate locations shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions observed in the pits were logged by our engineering technician who obtained sam- ples of the soils during excavation. Graphic logs of the soils observed in the pits are shown on Figures 3 and 4. Subsurface conditions observed in the test pits consisted of about 6 to 18 inches of "topsoil" overlying clayey sand with gravel. Beneath the sand we encoun- tered poorly -graded gravel with sand and silt to silty gravel with sand to the maxi- mum depth explored of 10 feet below existing ground surface. The soils contained cobbles and boulders up to 2 feet in diameter. Water seepage was observed in TP- 2 at a depth of 9 feet. The pits were backfilled after excavation operations were completed. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where field clas- sifications were checked and samples were selected for pertinent testing. Swell consolidation testing conducted on two samples of the onsite sand soils, shown on Figure 5, indicates very low expansion potential when wetted under a constant sur- charge. Gradation test results of the gravel soils are presented on Figures 6, 7, 8 and 9. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 3 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbakeMppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx GEOLOGY We reviewed the following geologic mapping showing the site. 1. Geologic Map of the Fraser 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Grand County, Colorado (SI Map 3130, Version 1.0), by Ralph R. Shroba, Bruce Bry- ant, Karl S. Kellogg, Paul K. Theobald, and Theodore R. Brandt with the U.S. Geological Survey, 2010. The site is mapped as younger stream -terrace alluvium and intermediate stream -terrace alluvium. The site is close to the geologic contact between the allu- vial deposits and colluvial deposits. Our field investigation and observations at the site support the mapping. We did not observe geologic constraints on this site that would inhibit the planned construction. SITE EARTHWORK We anticipate excavation of the soils can be accomplished using conven- tional, heavy duty excavating equipment. Hard cobbles and boulders should be ex- pected. Some boulders will be large. A hydraulic hammer chisel (excavator attach- ment) or similar device may be required to split large boulders. Sides of excavations need to be sloped to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. We anticipate the gravel soils will likely classify as Type C soils based on OSHA standards govern- ing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 4 feet that are not retained should be no steeper than 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils. Some sloughing of the excavation face may occur as the soils dry out. Contractors are required to identify the soils encountered and ensure that applicable standards are met. Con- tractors are responsible for site safety and maintenance of the work site. Groundwater seepage was observed in the pits, as noted in SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. Water seepage should be expected during excavation. The footing areas should be protected from any seepage and precipitation through the use of GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 4 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx M shallow trenches and sumps. Trenches should be 1 to 2 feet below footing sub - grade elevation. Excavations should be sloped to a gravity discharge or to a tempo- rary sump where water can be removed by pumping, if necessary. It is very im- portant that an excavation dewatering plan be in place prior to excavation. If the footing subgrade soils are exposed without proper drainage and become softened due to equipment traffic, subexcavation and replacement may be required. This pro- cess can be costly. We can provide additional recommendations at the time of con- struction. Structural Fill We do not anticipate that structural fill will be needed below foundations. However, removal of boulders sometimes requires placement of structural fill to re- establish subgrade elevation. The on -site gravel soils, free of organic matter, exces- sive silt and clay, debris, and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter, can be used as structural fill. Care should be taken during fill placement so the larger rocks do not become nested or grouped together. Structural fill should have no rock larger than 6 inches. We can evaluate potential fill materials upon request. Lean -mix concrete flowable fill) can also be used to fill voids. Prior to the placement of any structural fill, all topsoil should be removed. Structural fill should be placed level in thin loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 98 percent of ASTM D 698 maximum dry density. Moisture content and density of structural fill should be tested by a representative of our firm during placement. FOUNDATIONS The proposed buildings can be supported on footing foundations on the un- disturbed, natural soils. Prior to concrete placement, the footing areas should be GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 5 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\NppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx moistened and compacted to provide a flat and level subgrade. Loose and dis- turbed soils should be removed or compacted. Structural fill, if required, should be tested by our representative and meet the criteria in Structural Fill. Our representa- tive should observe conditions exposed in the completed foundation excavation to confirm whether the exposed soils are as anticipated and suitable for support of the foundation. Footings can be sized using a maximum allowable soil pressure of 3,000 psf. We expect settlement of footings will be approximately 1 inch or less. 2. To resist lateral loads, a coefficient of friction of 0.40 can be used for concrete in contact with soil. Lateral loads can be resolved by evaluat- ing passive resistance using a passive equivalent fluid density of 350 pcf for onsite gravel backfill that is compacted to the criteria in Founda- tion Wall Backfill and will not be removed. These values have not been factored; appropriate factors of safety should be applied in de- sign. Deflection is necessary to develop passive pressures. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum di- mensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets and resist lateral earth pressures. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 10 feet. Reinforcement should be de- signed by the structural engineer. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished exterior grade. SLABS -ON -GRADE Slab -on -grade lower level and garage floors are desired. Based on our labor- atory test data and experience, we judge slab -on -grade construction supported by the undisturbed, natural soils or properly placed granular structural fill will have a low GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 6 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\DocumentsWlgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==1SU01277.002-120 R1.docx risk of damaging differential movement. Fill placed to attain subgrade elevations be- low floor slabs should be placed in accordance with the recommendations outlined in Structural Fill. We recommend the following precautions for slab -on -grade con- struction at this site. These precautions will not prevent movement from occurring; they tend to reduce damage if slab movement occurs. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexi- ble couplings. 3. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with Ameri- can Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems as- sociated with shrinkage and curling. 4. We recommend a 4-inch layer of clean gravel be placed beneath the slabs to provide a flat, uniform subgrade. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. 5. The 2015 International Residential Code (IRC R506) states that a 4- inch base course layer consisting of clean graded sand, gravel, crushed stone or crushed blast furnace slag shall be placed beneath below grade floors (unless the underlying soils are free -draining), along with a vapor retarder. IRC states that the vapor retarder can be omitted where approved by the building official. The merits of installation of a vapor retarder below floor slabs depend on the sensitivity of floor coverings and building use to moisture. A properly installed vapor retarder is more beneficial be- low concrete slab -on -grade floors where floor coverings, painted floor surfaces, or products stored on the floor will be sensitive to moisture. The vapor retarder is most effective when concrete is placed directly on top of it, rather than placing a sand or gravel leveling course be- tween the vapor retarder and the floor slab. Placement of concrete on the vapor retarder may increase the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Use of concrete with reduced shrinkage characteristics includ- ing minimized water content, maximized coarse aggregate content, GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 7 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx U and reasonably low slump will reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Considerations and recommendations for the installation of vapor retarders below concrete slabs are outlined in Section 3.2.3 of the 2006 American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction (ACI 302.R-96)". FOUNDATION WALLS Foundation walls which extend below -grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drain- age of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at -rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls that can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates typical below -grade walls in residences deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflec- tion results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be between the "active" and "at -rest" conditions. If on -site soils are used as backfill and the backfill is not saturated, we recom- mend design of basement walls at this site using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf. This value assumes deflection, some minor cracking of walls may oc- cur. If very little wall deflection is desired, a higher design value is appropriate. The structural engineer should also consider site -specific grade restrictions, the effects of large openings on the behavior of the walls, and the need for lateral bracing during backfill. Retaining walls that are free to rotate and allow the active earth pressure con- dition to develop can be designed using an equivalent fluid density of at least 40 pcf for on -site soil backfill. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 8 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbakeMppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\DocumenlsWgu6wVYZjUS+btig5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx undation Wall Backfill Proper placement and compaction of foundation backfill is important to re- duce infiltration of surface water and settlement of backfill. The natural soils can be used as backfill, provided they are free of rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter, or- ganics, and debris. The upper 2 feet of fill should be a relatively impervious material to limit infiltration. Backfill which will support surface improvements (sidewalks, driveways, etc.) should be placed in thin loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within +/- 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D 698 maximum dry density. Backfill in landscape areas should be com- pacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM D 698 maximum dry density. Thickness of lifts will likely need to be reduced if there are small confined areas of backfill, which limit the size and weight of compaction equipment. Some settlement of the backfill should be expected even if the material is placed and compacted properly. In our experience, settlement of properly compacted backfill could be on the order of 0.5 to 1 percent of backfill thickness. Methods to reduce the risk of backfill settlement in- clude using a granular material and increasing the minimum compaction level. Moisture content and density of the backfill should be tested during placement by a representative of our firm. Observation of the compaction procedure is necessary. Testing without observation can lead to undesirable performance. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE We understand that the lower level floors of the buildings will be at or slightly above the exterior ground surface on all sides. There will be no below grade space or retaining conditions. Foundation walls will be constructed to approximately equal heights on both sides. Based on the proposed construction, we do not believe that foundation perimeter drains are merited. We should be contacted to provide founda- GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 9 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\Ibaker\AppOata\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btIg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx U tion perimeter drain recommendations if any below grade space or retaining condi- tions exist. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork. Recommendations in this report are based on effective drainage for the life of the structure and cannot be relied upon if effective drainage is not maintained. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construc- tion and maintained at all times after construction is completed: The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We recom- mend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet in land- scape areas. There are instances where this slope cannot be achieved. A slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet should be used as a minimum. We recommend a slope of at least 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. A swale should be provided around the uphill side of the building to divert surface runoff. 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be placed as de- scribed in Foundation Wall Backfill. Increases in the moisture content of the backfill soils after placement often results in settlement. Settle- ment is most common adjacent to north facing walls. Re-establishing proper slopes (homeowner maintenance) away from the building may be necessary. 3. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Lawn sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the building. Low -volume emitters can be used within 5 feet of the foundation. 4. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geo- textile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 10 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\Ibaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx 5. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and/or extensions should be provided at all downspouts so water discharges onto the ground beyond the backfill. We generally recommend against burial of downspout discharge. Where it is necessary to bury downspout discharge, solid, rigid pipe should be used and it should slope to an open gravity outlet. Buried downspout discharge pipes should be heated (with thermostat) during winter months to prevent freezing. Downspout extensions, splash blocks and buried outlets must be maintained by the owner. CONCRETE Concrete in contact with soil can be subject to sulfate attack. We measured the water-soluble sulfate concentration in a sample taken from the site at 0.01 and 0.02 percent. For this level of sulfate concentration, ACI 332-08 Code Require- ments for Residential indicates there are no special requirements for sulfate re- sistance. Superficial damage may occur to the exposed surfaces of highly permeable concrete, even though sulfate levels are likely relatively low. To control this risk and to resist freeze -thaw deterioration, the water-to-cementitious materials ratio should not exceed 0.50 for concrete in contact with soils that are likely to stay moist due to surface drainage or high water tables. Concrete should have a total air content of 6 percent ± 1.5 percent. PAVEMENT SECTION THICKNESS The natural gravel and sand soils encountered in our exploratory pits should provide good support for pavement. Any pockets of clay or silt soils are judged to be a poor support for pavements. Clay and silt soils encountered at subgrade should be removed beneath pavements and replaced with structural fill as outlined in Struc- tural Fill. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 11 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\Ibaker\AppDala\LocaPBox\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btig5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx Our recommendations assume a properly prepared subgrade and drained conditions. The collection and diversion of surface water away from paved areas is extremely important to the satisfactory performance of the pavement. Drainage de- sign should provide for the removal of water from the paved areas to limit wetting of the subgrade soils. Frost susceptible soils (with high levels of silt and/or clay) can be problematic if there is a free water source and heaving can occur. The on -site native gravel and sand soils generally have low frost susceptibility. The on -site silt and clay soils have a moderate to high frost susceptibility and should be removed. Shallow groundwater, which may occur during seasonal runoff, particularly near the ditch, makes frost heave more likely to occur. Our recommendations for pavement section thickness are given below per noted area. Traffic for the access road and drive lanes is expected to be primarily passenger vehicles with limited truck traffic buses, snowplows, garage trucks, delivery trucks). Pavement thickness for this type of development is often controlled by the truck traffic. Truck/bus traffic is esti- mated at 50 round trips per day (average annual daily traffic). Access Drives and Areas of Concentrated Traffic: New asphalt pave- ment should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches of asphalt over 6 inches of aggregate base course. 2. Parking Areas (with minimal expected truck traffic): New asphalt pave- ment should have a minimum thickness of 3 inches over 4 inches of aggregate base course. 3. Portland Cement Concrete: New portland cement concrete pavement for curbs, gutters and drain pans should have a minimum thickness of 6 inches over 6 inches of aggregate base course. 4. Other areas of concentrated traffic and turning movements such as ar- eas in front of dumpsters should consist of at least 8 inches of portland cement concrete over 6 inches of aggregate base course. Steel -rein- forcement can be added to the pavement to lengthen design life and reduce differential movement. We believe a reasonable reinforcement section for this type of project is a single mat of No. 4 rebar at a spac- ing of 24 inches each way (mid height of slab). GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 12 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 Rt.docx 5. These pavement thickness recommendations do not consider con- struction traffic loads. Consideration should be given to staging as- phalt and/or concrete placement to prevent damage by excessive con- struction equipment loads. These thicknesses are based on the sub- surface conditions encountered and our experience with similar pro- jects in the area. We have not been provided with traffic information for the site. If traffic counts are available, we can re-evaluate our rec- ommendations upon request. Subgrade Preparation, Structural Fill, and Aggregate Base Course Our recommendations for pavement assume a properly prepared subgrade. A representative from our office should be on -site to observe the subgrade and base course preparation and test any fill placement. The pavement subgrade for pro- posed access roads should be prepared as follows. All topsoil, silt or clay should be removed from pavement areas and replaced with structural fill. Prior to fill placement, the existing soils should be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted. The subgrade should be compacted to at least 98% of the ASTM D 698 maximum dry density at a moisture content within 2 percent of optimum. Prior to placement of structural fill or aggregate base course, the completed pavement subgrade should be proof -rolled with a fully loaded tandem dump truck with a gross weight of at least 50,000 pounds. Areas which deform excessively should be removed and replaced with structural fill to achieve a stable subgrade prior to placing pavement materials. The depth of sub - excavation should be determined on a case by case basis at the time of construc- tion. Normally, subexcavations to stabilize subgrade are 1 to 2 feet in depth. In some cases, geogrid reinforcement can be used to reduce subexcavation depths. Once subgrade elevations have been achieved, aggregate base course can be placed. Aggregate base course should have a minimum `R' value of 84 and meet CDOT Class 5 or 6 gradation specifications. The aggregate base course should be GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 13 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx compacted to at least 95% of the maximum Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) dry density at a moisture content within 2 percent of optimum. Asphalt Pavement The asphalt should consist of a mixture of aggregate, filler and asphalt ce- ment. The asphalt mixture should meet the Colorado Department of Transportation CDOT) grading requirements for an asphalt mix. The asphalt should be a batched hot mix, approved by the engineer, and placed and compacted to a density of 92% to 96% of the maximum theoretical density, determined according to Colorado Pro- cedure 51. The asphalt should be placed in lifts not exceeding 3 inches thick or less than 1.5 inches thick. We recommend State Highway Grading SX. Concrete Pavement All concrete should be based on a mix design established by a qualified engi- neer. A CDOT Class P mix is acceptable. The design mix should consist of aggre- gate, Portland cement, water, and additives which will meet the requirements con- tained in this section. The concrete should have a modulus of rupture of third point loading of 630 psi. Normally, concrete with a 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 psi will meet this requirement. Concrete should contain approximately 6 percent en- trained air. Maximum allowable slump should not exceed 4 inches. The concrete should contain joints not greater than 15 feet on centers. Joints should be sawed or formed by pre -molded filler. The joints should be at least'/4 of the slab thickness. Expansion joints should be provided at the end of each con- struction sequence and between the concrete slab and adjacent structures. Expan- sion joints, where required, should be filled with a Y2-inch thick asphalt impregnated fiber. Concrete should be cured by protecting against loss of moisture, rapid tem- perature changes and mechanical injury for at least three days after placement. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 14 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\8ox\Box Edit\Documents\lgu6wVYZjUS+btIg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx 0 Surface Drainage in Paved Areas Surface drainage is critical to the performance of pavements. Recommenda- tions in this report are based on effective drainage for the life of the improvements and cannot be relied upon if effective drainage is not maintained. The collection and diversion of surface water away from paved areas is extremely important to the sat- isfactory performance of the pavement. Drainage design should provide for the re- moval of water from the paved areas and prevent wetting of the subgrade soils. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Grand Park Develop- ment, LLC. and the design/construction team to provide geotechnical design and construction criteria for the proposed project. The information, conclusions, and rec- ommendations presented herein are based upon consideration of many factors in- cluding, but not limited to, the type of structure proposed, the geologic setting, and the subsurface conditions encountered. The conclusions and recommendations con- tained in the report are not valid for use by others. Standards of practice evolve in the area of geotechnical engineering. The recommendations provided in this report are appropriate for about three years. If the proposed project is not constructed within about three years, we should be contacted to determine if we should update this report. We recommend that CTL I Thompson, Inc. provide construction observation services to allow us the opportunity to verify whether soil conditions are consistent with those found during this investigation. If others perform these observations, they must accept responsibility to judge whether the recommendations in this report re- main appropriate. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 15 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\IbakerlAppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect with any geotechnical evaluation primarily because the methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. We never have complete knowledge of subsurface conditions. Our analysis must be tempered with engineering judgment and experi- ence. Therefore, the recommendations presented in any geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk -free. Our recommendations represent our judgment of those measures that are necessary to increase the chances that the structure will perform satisfactorily. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are fol- lowed during construction. The homeowner must assume responsibility for main- taining the structure and use appropriate practices regarding drainage and land- scaping. Improvements performed by the owner after construction, such as finishing a basement or construction of additions, retaining walls, decks, patios, landscaping and exterior flatwork, should be completed in accordance with recommendations in this report. RADON Radon is a gaseous, radioactive element that comes from the radioactive de- cay of uranium, which is commonly found in igneous rocks. The average indoor ra- don level in Grand County is approximately 5.6 pCi/L (http://county-ra- don. info/CO/Summit.html), which is above the recommended action level of 4 pCi/L as recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency. Testing for radon gas at the site is beyond the scope of this study. Due to the many factors that affect the ra- don levels in a specific building, accurate testing of radon levels is usually only pos- sible after construction is complete. Typically, radon mitigation systems consist of ventilation systems installed beneath lower level slabs and crawlspaces. The infra- structure for such a mitigation system can normally be installed during construction at a relatively low cost, which is recommended. The buildings should be tested for GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 16 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\Ibaker\AppData\Local\Box\Box Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 Rt.docx radon once construction is complete. If test results indicate mitigation is required, the installed system can then be used for mitigation. We are not experts in radon testing or mitigation. If the client is concerned about radon, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. LIMITATIONS The exploratory pits were located to provide a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by the pits will occur. A representative of our firm should observe placement of and test structural fill. We should observe the completed foundation excavation to confirm that the exposed soils are suitable for support of the footings. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions. No war- ranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, please call. CT THOM SON, INC. Brittany Nigge er Staff Geologi t Lindsey Baker Engineering Technician III BSN:LKB:GWB cc: clark -cstoneholdings.com Reviewed George W.l Division Ma r=:9:9 mill 4 > J b tl 0 3.0 1S 4 xC J Z •,+ e III, er, Summit County '. GRAND PARK DEVELOPMENT, LLC. 17 WILLOW APARTMENTS PHASE II-72 UNITS, WILLOWS AT GRAND PARK CTL I THOMPSON PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 C:\Users\lbaker\AppData\Local\BoxkBox Edit\Documents\Mgu6wVYZjUS+btlg5HY+5g==\SU01277.002-120 R1.docx Not to scale U9hesAv,, Fraser _ I s© Meadcw Mite --Cram,, n io an m -- 0 r h[Ley Pkury 03rrtst. erAve= _ - r' ant=-Carab ouAve: _ - li t Cougar -Ave = phi _ Rai nhc;"r `_]r= - a Or _ 1 Proje c t _ Locotion -. Ma ate 41 -. G VICINITY MAP Project No. SU01277.002-120—R1 Figure 1 Scale: 1 inch = 100 feet LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Project No. SU01277.002-120—R1 Figure 2 Elevation In Feet M rn O rn O In 00 co r\ N t0 to rn IR Ili c0 00 00 00 of ai n M tp II MN YO II IIM OII IcoNMIIo 00 UMJdN mJa+tl Ili w d J I— W in h C6 II II Z II o II 00" U vN l > H W tT N M MO co II II II p N II uoJdyN I W0- J I- W Ili N r0MN ^ JaC4G II II II M11 NIIII ZZII II00 o KEn M-ja+cn I 00 r- 171 CL I'- W fl)MmNNN II II II p II II - avoo to U + 11 0 O N NIP) O LO a0 c000 I,, N rn t0 t0 w c000 00 00 O) cn p Z W 0 W J J99J Ul UOIIDA913 L ; D7 m O) N CCO tD O U) CL tY O Q O J CL x W V) O O CD rn L O N i N O On n NO M NO Z U m0 tl NOTES: 1. The pits were excavated with a track —mounted excavator on 4/20/21. 2. Groundwater levels shown above were observed at the time and under the conditions indicated. Groundwater levels can fluctuate. 3. Pit locations as shown on Figure 2 were measured from site features and should be considered approximate. 4. Pit elevations are estimated from topography shown on Figure 2 and should be considered approximate. Relative elevations were checked by hand level. 5. These exploratory pits are subject to the explanations, limitations and conclusions contained in this report. Project No. SU01277.002-120—R1 SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS -CONTINUED Figure 4 3 2 1 Z 0 O z a - 1a x W 0 z -2 O U) U) W 3 a 2 O U -4 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of Clayey Sand with Gravel (SC) From TP-1 @ 2'6" 3 2 1 z 0 O U) z a a -1 x W 0 z -2 O W Q' -3 a O U -4 0.1 1.0 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of Clayey Sand with Gravel (SC From TP-2 (a. 1' CTLIT PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING 10 100 DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 112 PCF MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.7 % EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING 10 100 DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 119 PCF MOISTURE CONTENT= 11.8 % Swell Consolidation Test Results Figure 5 Ip HYDROMETER 1 11 11 / / 1 1 N-IIrIrIrlrlr-IIr111r111111 NNNNNNNN- N-I IIr111111 NNNNNNNN-N N---NNNNIIIIIIIIr1111 N-.-NI N 1 N-IIIIr11111111 NNN 1 N 1 N INNIIIIIIIIIIII N-IrIr111111111 1111111111r11 NNNN N NN111111111111 1 1 N IIrIrIrIr1111 N NNNN NN1111111111 N N NNN r1111 1 N NN111111111111 1 1 N-NNNNNN-INNN N-IIrIrIrIr11-IIIIr NNNI N I-NNNIIIIIIIIIIII N----NN-i NNNN 1• 1 N-N•-NN-I NNNN N 1-IIIIIIIIIIIII NNNNI-IIIIIIIIIIr11 NNNN N r N--IIrIrIr11 N N l1IINN NNN 1 N-NNN N NI-NN N 1--1-IIIIIIIII N N I NNNNI-a IIr1111111111 1Ir11111r11111 N•1 NNNNNN N r N-111 1-IIr1111111r111 N-N NNNN 1 N--IIIIIII NNI-N NNNN 1 N-IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII N NNNNN! N N I NNNN NNNN 1 N-IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII NNN N/III NNNN- N-IIrIrIrlrlrlr NNN N NNNN N N IIrIrIrlrlr 1111111111rIr NNN N r NNN N 1 N-IIrIrIrlrlr-IIIIIIII NNN I N NNN N N-111,-NNN N N N NN i N-IIrIrIrlrlr-IIIII NNN N NNNN N N-IIrIrIrlrlr-IIIIIIIII NNN N I NNN N N-IIrIrIrlrlr-IIr NNN 1 N111111111 NNNN 1 1 11 11 11• 1 1 1 •1 1 r 1 CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON -PLASTIC) Sieve Size % Passing 1.5 in. 100 3/4 in. 97 1/2 in. 93 3/8 in. 90 No.4 73 No.8 65 No. 16 56 No.30 47 No.50 36 No. 100 29 No.200 27 Curve No. Sample of _Clayey Sand with Gravel (SC) GRAVEL(USCS) 27 % SILT & CLAY 27 % From TP-1 @ 2'6"-3'6" PLASTICITY INDEX SAND(USCS) 46 % LIQUID LIMIT 32 % 18% Gradation Test Results CTLIT PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 Figure 6 HYDROMETER Sieve Size % Passing 4 in. 100 3 in. 96 2 in. 86 1.5 in. 79 3/4 in. 68 1/2 in. 58 3/8 in. 53 No.4 38 No.8 35 No. 16 27 No. 30 18 No. 50 11 No. 100 8 No.200 6 Curve No. Sample of Poorly -Graded Gravel with Silt & Sand (GP -GM) GRAVEL(USCS) 62 % SAND(USCS) 32 % SILT & CLAY 6 % LIQUID LIMIT NL % From TP-1 @ 5'-6' PLASTICITY INDEX NP % Gradation Test Results CTLIT PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 Figure 7 a] New, Sieve Size % Passing 4 in. 100 3 in. 91 2 in. 73 1.5 in. 65 3/4 in. 54 1/2 in. 50 3/8 in. 47 No.4 36 No.8 33 No. 16 27 No.30 20 No. 50 13 No. 100 8 No.200 7 Curve No. 1 Sample of Poorly -Graded Gravel with Silt & Sand (GP -GM) GRAVEL(USCS) 64 % SAND(USCS) 29 % SILT & CLAY 7 % LIQUID LIMIT NIL % From TP-3 @ 5'6"-6'6" PLASTICITY INDEX NP % Gradation Test Results CTLIT PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 Figure 8 rrrrrr rrrrrr o rrr••• rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrr r rrrrrr r rrrrrrr rrrr rrrr•rrrrrrr rrrrrr r•rr rr rrrrrurrrrrr•rrrrrrr rrrrr•r r rrrrr r rrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr r r rr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr r rrrrrr rrrr I rrrrrrr rrrrrrrrlr••rrrrrrlrrrrrrrrl- rrrrrrrl rrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrrl rrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrlrrr•Irrrrl rrrrllrrrrrrlr rrrrrr•rrrrrrr rrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrrlrrrrrrrrr•rrrr r rrrl rrrrrr•rrrrrrrrl------ rrrrr r rrrrrr iJ rr rrr r• rrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrrr rrrrrr rrrrrr r•rrrrr r CLAY PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON -PLASTIC) Sieve Size % Passing 3 in. 100 2 in. 92 1.5 in. 85 3/4 in. 72 1/2 in. 64 3/8 in. 59 No.4 45 No. 8 41 No. 16 34 No.30 25 No. 50 18 No. 100 15 No. 200 13 Curve No. Sample of Silty Gravel with Sand (GM) GRAVEL(USCS) 55 % SAND(USCS) 32 % SILT & CLAY 13 % LIQUID LIMIT 22 % From TP-5 @ 8'-9' PLASTICITY INDEX 3 % Gradation Test Results CTLIT PROJECT NO. SU01277.002-120-R1 Figure 9 9 ZO Cl) W N F OO n Q OO O m p J Z LL ~ OUW O a U) F U c? c? U U U U U) U OCL 0 U) 0 330 3 3y m a am m aa m 3 U1 @ T c9 f6 O c6 O N U U IL U a U U) Z o W n N> a O N M ZCL w Q Z N LLJ O c O O O O C U JZW of N m c(o WW Ua w J (n U) W (n U) O O d O O Ww d W Z) W W O O Md w d M co H¢a U) WH Jw U) JJ ^ W o M N O O CO U) Uw^ma X J U) Z N Z n aZ co co g- WaW w p F o_ o M NM Z M Z M NN Q J J U)Ur rn Wa p W Z w nriv^ M N ao rn r, coLnZomyr OO g U o cn dZoM O c0 VN Wp N O 0 N Oin O CO O N co Oa JaXW E ESTIMATED TIME SCHEDULE FOR DEVELOPMENT (PHASE 1): 36 MONTHS APRIL 1, 2022 THRU APRIL 1, 2025 The Willows Apartments at Grand Park Will Serve Letters from Utilities The Willows Apartment neighborhood is part of the Grand Park community being developed in Fraser, Colorado. The following utilities committed to providing service at the Preliminary Planned Development Plan stage for the entire community. These agencies will be sent referral packages of this specific ‘Willows Apartments’ Final Planned Development Plan and Final Plat submittal. Sanitary Sewer – Town of Fraser Water – Town of Fraser Gas – Xcel Energy Electric – Mountain Parks Electric Telephone – Comcast FRASER PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2022-02-01 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK FINAL PLAN – AMENDMENT 2 (PLANNING AREA 2W.1 AND 2W.2) AND ALPENGLOW AT GRAND PARK FINAL PLAT FILINGS 1, 2 AND 3, GRAND PARK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOCATED IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 75 WEST OF THE 6TH PM, TOWN OF FRASER, COUNTY OF GRAND, STATE OF COLORADO WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Fraser Planning Commission held on February 23, 2022, Grand Park Development was present, requesting a recommendation of approval for a Final Plan Amendment 2 and Final Plats Filings 1, 2 and 3, Alpenglow at Grand Park; and WHEREAS, Grand Park Development is the current owner of said property; and WHEREAS, the owner is proposing to subdivide 16.8 acres into 204 multi-family condominiums on 16 lots in three phases; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and staff have determined that this application is in compliance with the Land Development Code of the Town of Fraser. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Fraser Planning Commission has voted to recommend approval of this development application with the following conditions: 1.Developer must agree to provide a dedicated right-of way for and construct the remaining portion of Old Victory Road as part of the subdivision improvements for this project and must be included in the SIA in conjunction with the first recorded plat. 2.Developer must agree to construct the Highway 40 sewer crossing to provide the capacity necessary to serve the Alpenglow project, as well as future development. The proposed Alpenglow project will exceed the capacity of the current system. Construction of these sewer improvements must be included in the SIA in conjunction with the first plat recorded. 3 . Provide emergency turnaround easement at the end of American Willow Drive per Code Section 14-3-40 Horizontal alignment ( A l l d e a d - e n d s t r e e t s r e q u i r e t u r n a r o u n d s o r c u l - d e - s a c s p e r A t t a c h m e n t A - 1 2 - C u l - D e - S a c a n d T u r n a r o u n d s f o r S t r e e t s . A l l t u r n a r o u n d s s h a l l p r o v i d e t e n ( 1 0 ) f e e t o f l e v e l , t r e e l e s s g r o u n d a r o u n d t h e p e r i m e t e r . S p e c i a l a t t e n t i o n s h o u l d b e g i v e n t o p r o v i d e a d e q u a t e f u n c t i o n a l s n o w s t o r a g e a n d s i g h t d i s t a n c e . A l l t u r n a r o u n d s s h a l l b e s i g n e d " E m e r g e n c y T u r n A r o u n d , N o P a r k i n g A n y t i m e . " ) . 4.A d d r e s s r e v i e w c o m m e n t s p r o v i d e d b y P u b l i c W o r k s i n e m a i l d a t e d 1 / 2 7 / 2 0 2 2 a n d d r a i n a g e a n d u t i l i t y e n g i n e e r i n g c o m m e n t s p r o v i d e d b y M e r r i c k & C o m p a n y ( U S 4 0 S a n i t a r y C r o s s i n g c o m m e n t s 2 0 2 2 - 0 1 - 1 4 , C o n s t r u c t i o n P l a n s f o r M e y e r L o t 2 - U S 4 0 S a n i t a r y C r o s s i n g R e v i e w m e m o d a t e d 1 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 2 a n d A l p e n g l o w D r a i n a g e R e v i e w m e m o d a t e d 1 2 / 1 6 / 2 0 2 2 , a n d 1 0 0 % C o n s t r u c t i o n D o c u m e n t s d a t e d 1 2 / 1 5 / 2 0 2 2 ) a n d r e v i s e d o c u m e n t s a c c o r d i n g l y . 5.Under the General Note section on each final plat, fill in the blanks with reception numbers, etc. 6.There is no sheet 12 on the Final Plan – Amendment 2. 7.On sheet 4 of the Final Plan – Amendment 2, on the site data chart, under future residential land use, delete 66 and reference to allowed density transfer. 8.Address review comments provided by The Whitmer Law Firm in memo dated 2/17/2022 and revise documents accordingly. 9.Applicant must secure CDOT Utility Permit for US 40 sewer crossing prior to recording the first plat. 10.Applicant shall resubmit for review and approval all final plat and final plan documents. This development application shall be scheduled for Town Board review once these conditions has been addressed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23th DAY OF February 23, 2022. FRASER PLANNING COMMISION Vice Chair ATTEST: (SEAL) Town Clerk