HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1985-02-19 CC�����
.~~�� ��
LYNWOOD
11mmouLunROAD
u/wvvoOc\ CALIFORNIA mr26u
(213) 603-0220
acam
ALL-AMERICA CITY
/N N/
N0�N
`��~
JOHN avnRx Mayo
Councilmen
E. L MORRIS
JAMES E. ROWs
LOUIS Ar*owpaow
AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION
AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL
TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 p.m.
OPENING CEREMONIES
1. CALL TO ORDER
�. INVOCATION - REVEREND PAUL BRADSHAW
LYN-GATE NEIGHBORHOOD CHURCH
�. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. ROLL CALL OF COUNCILMEN
Robert Henning
E. L. Morris
James E. Rowe
Louis A. Thompson
John D. Byork
5. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: NONE
6. PROCLAPC47ION: NONE
7. COUNCIL RECESS TO: LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA
SCHEDULED-MATTERS
8. PUBLIC HEARING: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION
REVO�ING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE
BUSINESS AT 10801 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD.
Comments: Chronology of Guillermo Terriquez C/U/P at 10801
Long Beach Boulevard:
- Feb. 8, 1983 - Commission approves CUP with 19
conditions.
- May 250983 - Mr. Terriquez warned of non-
compliance with CUP conditions
(among other things, no
business license).
- Nov. 15, 1983 - Notice to Mr. Terriquez of
automatic suspension of CUP.
- Dec. 13, 1983 - Public hearing for commission to
consider revocation of CUP.
M - 4.. 4. __ -- —4. � — —I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRAURY 19, 1985
8. (CONTINUED)
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the attached
resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION REVOKING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A GENERAL
AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR BUSINESS AT 10801 LONG
BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD."
9. PUBLIC HEARING: ADOPTION OF BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,
ELECTRIC CODES, AND AMENDMENT OF LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE
Comments: The attached ordinances are submitted for
Council approval and adoption. They
call for adoption by reference (with
certain exceptions) the 1982 Building
Code, The 1982 Plumbing Code, the 1982
Mechanical Code, and the 1984 Electric
Code.
Recommendation: At the conclusion of the public hearing,
Council waive reading and introduce the
Ordinances for the purpose of adopting
the four (4) new codes.
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon
by one Motion affirming the action recommended on the Agenda.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to
voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific
items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
10. REQUEST FOR CITY LOAN TO THE ALAMEDA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA
Comments: Staff is requesting Council's Approval of
a $450,000 loan to the Lynwood
Redevelopment Agency for administrative
expenses and overhead in the Alameda
Project Area. Loan is to be repaid by
the Agency from tax increments with
maximum allowable interest.
Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that City
Council approve the attached Resolution
entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROPRIATING FUNDS AS A LOAN TO THE
LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMFNT AGENCY."
11. ANNUAL REVIEW AND REPORT ON GENERAL PLAN
Comments: State and Local Codes require that the
Pity Council annually review the General
Plan for consideration of any
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: PATRICK P. IMPORTUNA, DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION REVOKING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE
BUSINESS AT 10801 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD.
PROPOSAL City Council review of Appeal of Guillermo Terriquez.
FACTS 1. A Conditional Use Permit was approved by the Planning Commission
for the subject property on February 8, 1983. The approval,
subject to nineteen (19) conditions was agreed to in writing
by Mr. Terriquez, the owner of the business.
2. On January 10, 1984 the Planning Commission considered a poss-
ible revocation, however, after review of the case it appeared
Mr. Terriquez had for the most part complied with the conditions.
He was allowed ninety days in which to completely comply with all
requirements.
3. On January 8, 1985, the Planning Commission considered once again
the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit and determined that
Mr. Terriquez had not complied with conditions imposed; the
Planning Commission unanimously voted to revoke the Conditional
Use Permit.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. General automotive repair businesses require a Conditional Use
Permit and a business license in order to conduct this activity.
2. The use requested must be in accordance with the following find-
ings:
a) The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan.
b) That the proposed location of the Conditional Use is in accord
with the objectives of this chapter and the purpose of the
zone in which the site is located.
C) That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improve-
ments in the vicinity.
d) That the proposed Conditional Use will comply with each of
the applicable provisions of this chapter, except for
approved variances.
3. A use which does not comply with the requirements of the zone in
which it is established is detrimental to the implementation of
the community long range goals as set forth in the General Plan.
4. The owner of the business has had over two (2) years in which to
completely comply with the conditions and has not done so; there
5. The staff report to the Planning Commission and supporting
information is attached for review.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council concur with Planning Commission Reso-
lution No. 1034 and sustain the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for
the operation of a general automotive repair facility at 10801 Long Beach
Boulevard, Lynwood.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Letter of Appeal
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1034
4. Staff Report to Commission
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD SUSTAINING THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION REVOKING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A GENERAL
AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR BUSINESS AT 10801 LONG
BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has filed an application for
Revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a genera:
automotive repair business at the subject address;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood.
pursuant to law, held a public hearing concerning said application
and based upon testimony presented, adopted its Resolution No. 1034
revoking said conditional use permit;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that said application is
exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act per Section 15101 of C.E.Q.A. guidelines, as amended;
WHEREAS, an appeal has been made to the City Council in
a timely manner;
WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to law, did, on
February 19, 1985 hold a public hearing on said appeal;
Section 1 . The City Council does hereby find and
determine that the revocation should be sustained for the following
reasons:
A. That the continuation of the Conditional Use
Permit will adversely affect the comprehensive
General Plan;
B. That the conditional use is not in accordance
with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
the purpose of the zone in which the property is
located;
C. That the existing location of the conditional use
and the conditions under which it is operated and
maintained is detrimental to the public health,
safety, and welfare and is materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity;
D. That the owner of the business or property has not
compiled with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
as stated in the assigned conditions of the Conditional
Use Permit; specifically,
(a) All automotive work shall be performed entirely
within a building.
(b) The proposed business shall be registered with
the Bureau of Automotive Repair.
(c) A trash enclosure shall be installed per Section
25- 16.15(c) of the Zoning Ordinance.
(e) No vehicles may be stored at the site for
purposes of sale.
(f) No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored
for purposes other than repair.
(g) The vehicle storage area at the rear of the
property shall be properly surfaced.
(h) Applicant shall not operate the conditional
use until all conditions are satisfied; all
conditions must be met within ninety (90)
days;
E. That the rear portion of the property is potentially
a fire and safety hazard because of an accumulation of
weeds, trash, rubbish and wrecked vehicles and automobil
parts located adjacent to a residential (apartments)
use.
F. That the use of the office in the main structure for a
residence is specially not allowed under the City of
Lynwood Zoning Code and the conditions of the Conditiona
Use Permit.
G. That the property is being maintained in a manner
detrimental to the health and safety of employees and
customers in that trash is not confined to an operable
and functioning trash enclosure and wrecked automobiles
and parts are left in a hap hazard manner near work
areas.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Lynwood does
hereby sustain the decision of the Planning Commission in revoking
said Conditional Use Permit.
1985. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 11
JOHN D. B YORK , .Mayor
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
City of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
PATRICK P. IMPORTUNA, Director,
Community Development
City Attorney
d66
" Modple
Alook
r c
*Oda 06
-dMLA-
tam
(2131 637-990
RECEIVED
JAN 9 3 1985
�w
CITY OF LYi
COMM. DEV. DEPT.
RESOLUTION NO. 1034
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD REVOKING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
THE OPERATION OF A GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
BUSINESS AT 10801 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood, pursuant to law, held a public hearing on subject application;
'WHEREAS, the Commission has carefully considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that this project is exempt
from CEQA requirements per Section 15101 of CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
WHEREAS, the Planni nZ--Cmmn ssi n —^ f= -- the - City of Lynwood does
hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1 . The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood finds
and concludes as follows:
A. That the continuation of the Conditional Use Permit will
adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan;
B. That the conditional use is not in accordance with the ob-
jectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the zone
in which the property is located;
C. That the existing location of the conditional use and the
conditions under which it is operated and maintained is de-
trimental to the public health, safety, and welfare and is
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity;
D. That the owner of the business or property has not complied
with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance as stated in the
assigned conditions of the Conditional Use Permit; specifically,
(a) All automotive work shall be performed entirely within a building.
(d) The proposed business shall be registered with the Bureau of
Automotive Repair.
(g) A trash enclosure shall be installed per Section 25- 16.15(c) of the
Zoning Ordinance.
(h) Automobiles awaiting repair shall be separated from the customer
parking area, and shall be screened from view from Long Beach
Boulevard and adjoining properties.
(n) No vehicles may be stored at the site for purposes of sale.
(o) No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored for purposes
other than repair.
(r) The vehicle storage area at the rear of the property shall be
properly surfaced.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRAURY 19. 1985
12. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE DEFERRED PAYMENT LOAN
LIMITS
Comments: In view of rising construction costs
increased stocp of older housing,
ng and
high incidence of Code viola��rzons, the
current level of Deferred Payment Loan
(DPL) amounts are inadequate to meet
homeowner needs. DPL loan limits for
owner-occupied single family dwellings
should be raised from $10,000 to $15,000
for general repairs and removal of Code
Violations, and from $16,000 to $25,000
for room additions. The HCDA Board
approved this recommendation on December
5, 1984.
Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests Council
approval of the attached
Resolution raising the DPL limits for
owner-occupied single family dwellings
from $10,000 to $15 for general
repairs and from $16,000 to $25,000 for
room additions.
13. LE SAGE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 5-5030)
Comments: On February 6, 1985, the bid opening was
held on the LeSage Street project.
Gully-Miller Contracting Co. was the
lowest responsible bidder at $175,
Additional street improvements and
replanting require that an appropriation
of $35,000 be made to cover the
Additional proiect costs.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council
award a contract to the lowest
responsible bidder, Sully-Miller
Contracting Company, based on its low bid
of $175,915 and adopt the attached
resolution entitled. "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
AUTHORIZING AN APPROPIATION OF ADDITIONAL
FUNDS FROM THE GAS TAX 2107 FUND TO COVER
THE COST OF THE LE SAGE STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT NO. 5-5030."
14. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE OF THREE SEDANS
Comments: On December 18, 1984, the City Council
appropriated $24,000 for the purchase of
three sedans. On January 2, 1985 the
City Council directed staff t '
o obtain
Prices on a vari of
cars and come back
with a recommendation.
Based on the requirements of user
departments, cost of acquisitions as
well as operating costs projections it
was concluded that Ford Escorts ` with
minimum added on+i""= — ---.'
CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1985
15. PAYMENT OF BIiLS - WARRANT REGISTER DATED FEBRUARY 19, 1985
Recommendation: Council approve Warrant Regiister Dated
FebrauarY 19, 1985
CITv_CLER�,S_AGENDA
1.6. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING SECTION 19-
64 OF THE LYNWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO PRIMA FACIE SPEED
LIMITS."
17. ONE (1) APPOINTMENT HCDA BOARD
18. ONE (1) VACANCY HrDA BOARD
19., CHARITABLE SOLICITATION REQUEST FROM ST. EMYDIUS CATHOLIC
CHURCH FOR PARISH FESTIVAL: MAY 3, 4, 5, 1985
EXECUTIVE-SESSION
20. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL, AT ITS CONVENIENCE,
ADJOURN TO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
COUNCIL_ORAL_COMMUNICATIONS
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
F. That the use of the office in the main structure for a residence
;s specially not allowed under the City of Lynwood Zoning Code
and the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit.
G. That the property is being maintained in a manner detrimental
to the health and safety of employees and customers in that
trash is not confined to an operable and functioning trash
enclosure and wrecked automobiles and parts are left in a hap
hazard manner near work areas.
Section 2 The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based
upon the aforementioned finding and determinations, hereby revokes the
Conditional Use Permit for 10801 Long Beach Boulevard.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 1985, by members of the Planning
Commission voting as follows:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Pryor, Raymond, Robbins & Sampson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Hodge & nanka
Lee Sampson, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Patrick P. Importu , Director
Cimmunity 1 t Department
APPROVED AS TO FOR.`':
General Counsel
CASE NO. 85Soo3
DATE: January 8, 1985
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Patrick P. Importuna, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -
10801 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD
PROPOSAL
This is a proposal to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the property
located at 10801 Long Beach Boulevard in the C -2A Zone.
FACTS
1. A Conditional Use Permit was approved by the Planning Commission for
the subject property on February 8, 1983. The approval was subject
to nineteen (19) conditions. Mr. Guillermo Terriquez agreed in
writing to be bound by the conditions - agreement dated February 11, 1983.
2. The subject site is located on the west side of Long Beach Boulevard
between Century Blvd and Pluma Street.
3. Existing land use is automobile repair and storage. Surrounding uses
are primarily automotive repair and other commercial uses. R -3 uses are
located to the west of the subject property.
4. Applicable Regulations: Sections 25 -9.2 et seq.; 25 -25.1 et seq.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Conditional Use Permit was granted on February 8, 1983 subject to nineteen
(19) conditions.
2. On May 25, 1983, Mr. Terriquez was advised in writing that he had not
complied with six (6) of the conditions and that he did not have a business
license. He was allowed thirty (30) days to comply with all conditions.
3. On November 15, 1983, Mr. Terriquez was advised that his Conditional Use
Permit was suspended for failure to comply with the conditions of Resolution
912 granting the C.U.P. A hearing for possible revocation of the C.U.P.
was scheduled for December 13, 1983, to comply.
4. At the December 13, 1983 hearing the Planning Commission, after accepting
testimony from the applicant (Mr. Terriquez), continued the matter until
January 10, 1984.
5. At the January 10, 1984 hearing, the Planning Commission after accepting
testimony, voted not to revoke the Conditional Use Permit since it
appeared the applicant had substantially complied with all conditions.
6. Acting upon a complaint, Code Enforcement Officers visited the site on
December 5, 1984. Upon inspection of the property, Mr. Terriquez did
not and has not complied with the conditions of Resolution 912; specifically,
Conditions:
(a) All automotive work shall be performed entirely within a building.
(n) No vehicles may be stored at the site for purposes of sale.
(o) No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored for purposes
other than repair.
(r) The vehicle storage area at the rear of the property shall be
properly surfaced.
(s) Applicant shall not operate the conditional use until all
conditions are satisfied; all conditions must be met within
ninety (90) days.
7. On December 8, 1984, Mr. Terriquez was informed by Certified Mail
(return receipt requested) that his Conditional Use Permit was
suspended until a public hearing could be held on January 8, 1984,
at which time, unless all conditions were completely complied with,
the Planning Commission could revoke the Conditional Use Permit.
In addition Mr. Terriquez was informed to cease all business
operations until the hearing was held and a determination made.
8. A site inspection on December 20, 1984 showed the business to be
operating and the violations not corrected.
RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS
It is recommended that the Planning Commission revoke the Conditional Use
Permit for the property at 10801 Long Beach Boulevard based on the following
findings:
1) That the conditional use is not in accordance with the objectives
of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the zone in which the
property is located;
2) That the proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions
under which it is operated and maintained is detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare and is materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity;
3) That the owner of the business or property has not complied with the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance as stated in the assigned conditions
of the Conditional Use Permit.
PP Ti: gh
Attachments:
Resolution
Resolution 912 (C.U.P.) and conditions
Site Map
Correspondence
Meeting minutes
ADDENDUM - CASE NO. 85003
RECOMI'ENDATIONS AND FINDINGS
4. That the rear portion of the property is potentially a fire and
safety hazard because of an accumulation of weeds, trash,
rubbish and wrecked vehicles and automobile parts located
adjacent to a residential (apartments) use.
5. That the use of the office in the main structure for a residence
is specially not allowed under the City of Lynwood Zoning Code
and the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit.
6. That the property is being maintained in a manner detrimental
to the health and safety of employees and customers in that trash
is not confined to an operable and functioning trash enclosure and
wrecked automobiles and parts are left in a hap hazard manner near
work areas.
t
- City 4f - - - - -�- -- - -- -- - -
-
L'M MT00D -_- -
11= W
yW am � ��IA T �� /.'.i/ �y��
- _ W00D, CA N 91/fPL
4i i.3) /W-O
W.AWMA M.
IIIIII
ft, Guillermo Terriquez
10801 Long Beach Blvd.
Lynwood. California 90262
Dear Mr. Terriquez:
Due to your failure to comply with the conditions of approval, your
Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an automotive repair
business at 10801 Long Beach Boulevard, Lynwood, California is here-
by suspended (Sec. 25 -25.12 of the Lynwood Municipal Code). You have
failed to comply with the following conditions of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 912:
1) Condition(&). All automotive work shall be performed entirely
within a building.
2) Condition(d). The proposed business.shall be registered with
the Bureau of Automotive Repair.
3) Condition(g). A trash enclosure shall be installed per
Section 25- 16.15(c) of the Zoning Ordinance.
4) Condition(h). Automobiles awaiting repair shall be separated
from the customer parking area, and shall be screened from vier;
from Long Beach Boulevard and adjoining properties.
5) Condition(n). No vehicles may be stored at the site for purposes
of sale.
6) Condition(o). No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored for
purposes other than repair.
7) Condition(r). The vehicles storage area at the rear of the
property shall be properly surfaced.
8) Condition(s). Applicant shall not operate the conditional use
until all conditions are satisfied; all conditions must be met
within ninety (90) days.
0 , -
The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on
r January S. 1985, and if all conditions are not completely
complied with, may revoke the Conditional Use Permit. You
must cease operating the business upon receipt of this
letter until all conditions are satisfied. The decision
of the Planning Commission is final unless appealed to the
City Council within fifteen (15) days after the date of the
-' Planning Commission action.
- 'Yours
Patrick P. Importune
Durector of Community Development
By. � ..
enneth Mullens
Senior Planner
PPI:gh
cc: Richard Stiles, Code Enforcement Officer
Martin Mayer, City Prosecutor
Pat Saldi, Business Licenser
City of
LI:Ni WOOD
11330 SULLIS ROAD +I
TO
C ) LYNWOOD. CALIFORNIA 90262
q213) 603-0220
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
DATE: December 7, 1984
TO: Ron W. Lathrope,Fire Chief
VIA: Kenneth R. Mullens, Senior Planner
FR O M: Patrick P. Importuna, Director Co unity Development
S U B J E C T : PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10801 LONG BEACH BOULEVARE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
In review of this Conditional Use Permit the following facts were
determined:
1. The CUP was approved by the Planning Commission subject to
nineteen (19) conditions on February 8, 199 Mr. Guillermo
Terriquez accepted the conditions in writing (signed February 11,
1985).
2. On May 25, 1983, Mr. Terriquez was advised in writing that he had
not complied with six (6) conditions of the Conditional Use Pe_rrrat
and did not have a business license. He was allowed specifies
times to correct all deficiencies.
3. On November 15, 1983, Mr. Terriquez was advised that his Conditional
Use Permit was suspended for failure to comply with the conditions
of Resolution 912. A hearing before the Planning Commission was
scheduled for December 13, 1983. Mr. Terriquez was given until
December 13, 1983 to comply with all conditions.
4. At the December 13, 1983 Planning Commission, after taking
testimony from the applicant (Mr. Terriquez), continued the matter
until January 10, 1984.
5. At the January 10, 1984 Planning Commission hearing the Commission
voted that the Conditional Use Permit not be revoked because the
applicant had sustantially complied with all conditions.
Ron W. Lathrod
December 7, 1984
page two
Based upon inspection of
it appears Mr. Terriquez
conditions of Resolution
(h), (n), (o) and (r) .
property by Code Enforcement Officers,
not and has not complied with the
spefifically,
the
did
912;
Conditions (a) , (d) , (9),
Therefore, I am advising Mr. Terriquez in writing that his Conditional
Use Permit is immediately suspended and that he must cease operation
of the business until all conditions have met. The Planning Commission
will hold a public hearing on the permanent re vokation on January
8, 1985.
I would also suggest that Code Enforcement explore additional legal
action against Mr. Terriquez through the City Prosecutor's office.
In addition, the Los County Health Department should be contacted to
check for possible violations.
cc: Martin Mayer
C� �7 of
]�:iNV OD
Eui!s RC-ID
YNY JC0C C.= .L�FOF�\
(213) 603.0220
'INTER — OFFICE ME
UAT E: December 5, 1984
7 0. Pat Importuna, Director - Community Development
VIA: Ron W. Lathrope, Fire Chief
FROM: OaS
Richard Stiles, Code Enforcement Officer
S U R J E Ci: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10801 LONG BEACH BLVD., CITY OF LYNWOOD
On November 27, 1984 this office received a complaint from a citizen concerning
the above - mentioned property. Upon an inspection at the property, it was
found that there were numerous violations. Also, on searching the files I
found that the property had a C.U.P. passed on February 8, 1983 and signed
by the owner on February 11, 1983. He, however, has not complied with the
following conditions of the C.U.P.:
(1) (Condition A) Working on cars all over property and not inside
building as specified.
(2) (Condition D) Owner could not show me proof that his is registered
with the Bureau of Automotive Repair. Checked with Alfonzo Molina of the
Downey Office and he confirmed that there was no registration.
(3) (Condition G) A trash bin enclosure has been installed but no trash
bin. Enclosure is full of trash and beer cans.
(4) (Condition H) Inoperable cars are parked in customer waiting area and
there are several inoperable cars that are waiting for repair that are not
screened off from public view.
(5) (Condition 0) Vehicles are being cut up with a torch to be junked.
(6) (Condition R) Vehicle storage area to rear of property is a grass
area and not properly surfaced.
(7) (Condition N) Using property for sale of cars.
There is also the complaint of loud music, beer drinking, parties and prostitution
going on, and there is also a man who has built a lean -to shed which he is
currently inhabiting as living quarters. Also, people are living in the room
inside the office and sleeping in cars on the property.
On December 5, 1984 I contacted the Sheriff's Department and spoke with
Det. Ernie Ortega about the problem of cutting up cars. He then told me he
would meet me at the property to further investigate for possible stolen cars.
At approx. 9:30 am on the same day I met with Det. Ortega and Det. Mike Riley
at the property. Upon their investigation Mr. Terriguez's brother was arrested
for possession of stolen car parts and other miscellaneous items.
Page 2 of 2
TO: Pat Importuna
SUBJECT: Property Located at 10801 Long Beach Blvd.
My recommendation would be to have the Planning Commission evaluate this C.U.P.
and possibly have it revoked, since it has been almost two (2) years since
Resolution 4912 has been passed and these conditions have not been met.
NOTE: For your further information I have photographs that were taken on
the property on December 5, 1984.
RWL:RLS /kns
Ivv-
RESOLUTION NO. 912
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR THE OPERATION OF A GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
BUSINESS AT 10801 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on subject application;
WHEREAS, the Commission has carefully considered all per-
tinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that this project is
exempt from CEQA requirements per Section 15101 of CEQA Guide.
lines, as amended.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
does hereby resolve as follows:
SECT ION 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lyn-
wood finds and — c ncludes as follows:
A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional Use
Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive
General Plan;
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use is
in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance
and the purpose of the zone in which the site is
located;
C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use
and the conditions under which it would be operated
or maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare,. or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity;
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will comply
with each of the applicable provisions of the Zon-
ing Ordinance as stated in the conditions below.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lyn-
wood approves the proposed project subject to the following con-
ditions:
a. All automotive work shall be performed entirely within
a building.
b. Two (2) parking spaces shall be provided. The spaces
are to be clearly striped with wheelstops inserted at
the head of each space.
c. The property shall be used solely for general auto-
motive repair per plans submitted, conditions imposed
and future approved modifications thereto.
d. The proposed business shall be registered with the
Bureau of Automotive Repair.
83001
g. A trash enclosure shall be installed per Section
25- 16.15(c) of the Zoning Ordinance.
h. Automobiles awaiting repair shall be separated from
the customer parking area, and screened from view
from Long Beach Boulevard and adjoining properties.
i. All necessary permits and licenses shall be obtained
prior to operation.
J. A landscaped area of at least five (5 %) of the total
area of the site shall be improved with well maintained
landscaping. Such landscaping shall be approved by
the Community Development Director and shall be
equipped with a sprinkler system or hose bibbs.
k. All Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning ordinance rem
quirements shall be met.
1. All required bonds for off -site improvements (water
mains, fire hydrants, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc.)
shall be submitted prior to issuance of any building
permits.
m. The Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void
if operation does not commence within one (1)
from the date of the approval.
n. No vehicles may be stored at the site for purposes of
sale.
o. No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored for pur-
poses other than repair.
p. The attached requirements of the Fire Department shall
be met.
q. A chain link fence six (6) feet in height shall be ine
stalled along north (side) property line.
r. The vehicles storage area at the rear of the property
shall be properly surfaced.
1
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of February, 1983,
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Hodge, Kanka, Read, Robbins, Pryor,
NOES: None and Raymond
ABSENT: Hone
on d ove, h irman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
I
_Xndta Read Director
Community Development Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1
Kurt Xeager
Assistant City Attorney
Statement of Acceptance
All conditions and provisions of the foregoing Conditional Use
Permit and Resolution No. 912, are hereby accepted by the under-
signed applicant, who expressly agrees to perform and be bound by
each condition thereof.
Date - //- ?3
c '
Si gnature --
0IIL R.AA,..4 _ �'f2R1 gUGZ
rint name
33081
DATE: December 13, 1983
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sandra M. Read, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -
GUILLERMO TERRIQUEZ - 10801 Long Beach Boulevard
BACKGROUND:
At its February 11, 1983 meeting, the Planning Commission granted a Con-
ditional Use Permit for the operation of an automotive repair business at
10801 Long Beach Boulevard.
Due to the failure of the applicant to comply with the conditions of
approval, the applicant was notified on November 15, 1983that the Condi-
tional Use Permit was automatically suspended (Sec. 25 -25.12 of the Code.)
This code section states that the Planning Commission shall hold a public
hearing within forty (40) days of the suspension date, and if not satis-
fied that the regulation(s) or condition(s) is /are being met, may re-
voke the Conditional Use Permit or take such action as may be necessary
to ensure compliance.
ANALYSIS:
On Tuesday, December 6, 1983, staff inspected the site for compliance
with the conditions of approval. On that date, the following conditions
had not been met:
1. The property shall be used solely for general automotive repair
per plans submitted. (The rear of the property is being used as
a junk yard).
2. A masonry wall six (6 feet in height shall be installed along
the rear lot line of the property as it abuts a residential zone
to the west. (Footings had been dug and a supply of blocks were
on the premises when staff inspected site).
3. No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored for purposes other
than repair. (As stated in #1, the rear of the property is being
used as a junk yard. Several damaged and wrecked vehicles were
being stored at the rear of the property when staff inspected the
site. The applicant stated that these vehicles would be removed by
December 13, 1983).
RECOMMENDATION:
If the property is in substantial compliance with the preceding conditions
by the December 13, 1983 hearing, staff feels the Conditional Use Permit
should be termporarily reinstated for a 6 month period. However, if
the preceding conditions are not met by December 13, staff recommends adop-
tion of the attached resolution revoking the Conditional Use Permit at
10801 Long Beach Boulevard.
City of
LYNWOOD
11330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213) 603 -0220
November 15, 1983
Guillermo Terriquez
402 East 30th Street
Los Angeles, California
Dear Mr. Terriquez:
9
IIII1
Due to your failure to comply with the conditions of approval, your
Conditional Use Permit for the operation of an automotive repair busi-
ness at 10801 Long Beach Boulevard is hereby automatically suspend-
ed (Sec. 25 -25.12 of Lynwood Municipal Code). You have failed to
comply with the following conditions of Planning Commission Resolu-
tion No. 912:
(a) All automotive work shall be performed entirely within a
building;
(c) The property shall be used solely for general automotive
repair per plans submitted; - -
(f) A masonry wall 6 feet in height shall be installed at the west
side of the property abutting the residential zone to the rear
of the site;
(g) A trash enclosure shall be installed per City Code standards;
(h) Automobiles awaiting repair shall be separated from the customer
parking area and shall be screened from view;
(i) All necessary permits and licenses, including a Business Li-
cense, shall be obtained prior to operation;
(o) No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored for purposes
other than repair;; -
(r) The vehicle storage area at the rear of the property shall be
properly surfaced.
Guillermo Terriquez
November 15, 1983
Page 2
The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on December 13,
1983, and if not satisfied that the conditions are being complied
with, may revoke the Conditional Use Permit. You must cease opera-
ting the business upon receipt of this letter, unless all condi-
tions that have been met. The decision of the Planning Commission
shall be final unless appealed to the City Council within fifteen
(15) days after the date of the Planning Commission action.
Sincerely,
SA DRA M. READ
Community Development Director
SMR: DM: b
cc: Adolfo Perez, 1868 Whitehurst Drive, Monterey Park, CA
Antonio Moreno, 38360 Flower Street, Cudahy, CA
John Velasquez, Code Enforcement Officer
r
�
May 25, 1983
Guillermo Terriquez
402 East 30th Street
Los Angeles, California
Dear Mr. Terriquez:
cit �;
LYNWOOD
ut•u.HICA dT
11330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213) 603.0220
This letter is to summarize aspects of your Conditional Use Permit
which we discussed on the site of your automotive repair business
at 10801 Long Beach Boulevard. These points are as follows:
1. Condition "b" of your Conditional Use Permit
(2) parking spaces be clearly striped on the
with wheelstops inserted at the head of each
on May 9 that you had obtained some concrete
these would be installed immediately and tha
would be met.
requires that two
parking lot surface
space. You indicated
wheelstops and that
t this requirement
2. Condition "f" requires that a six (6) foot high masonry wall be
installed along the rear (west) property line, as it abuts a
residential zone. You indicated that you needed some additional
time to comply with this condition. I stated that, although
the City Code requires that all conditions of a Conditional Use
Permit must be met within 90 days from the approval date, I would
be willing to grant an extensicn of 30 days to comply with this
condition.
3. Condition "g" requires that a trash enclosure be installed per
Section 25- 16.15(c) of the Zoning Ordinance. Since compliance
with this condition also involves construction, I stated that
I would be willing to grant a 30 day expension.
4. Condition "j" requires that five percent (5 %) of the site must
be landscaped with well maintained landscaping, I stated to
you that, if a landscaped strip were provided along the front
property line, this would be acceptable as conpl.iance with this
condition.
Guillermo Terriquez
Page two
May 25, 1983
In addition, three additional matters must be addressed - engine
pulling operations being done outdoors, the house trailer at the rear
of the lot, and your lack of a Business License.
Condition "a" requires that all automotive work must be done entirely
within a building. This includes the removing of engines by way of a
pulley or "cherry picker ". These operations must cease within thirty
(30) days unless done within a completely enclosed building.
Condition "c" requires that the property be used solely for general
autmotive repair, according to the plot plan submitted. The plot plan
you submitted does not show an area for painting of house trailers.
Thus, I am requiring that the house trailer be removed within thirty
(30) days.
You should also apply for a Business License at the City Clerk's
Office in the City Hall. This should be done as soon as possible.
If the preceding are not complied with in the specified times, this
matter will be referred to the Code Enforcement Division for appro-
priate action.
Sincerely,
DENNIS R. MACKAY
Planning Associate
cc: Adolfo Perez (1868 10itehurst Drive, Monterey Park, CA.).
Antonio Moreno (3830 Flower Street, Cudahy, CA.).
John Velasquez, Code Enforcement Officer
tl
� k �
N
0ICAq N714 Ln r
�
3
1
rV
�I
i
N
n
n�
`� r�r7b+da ��> J.S �►�► IJ�� -ej --j tr
SUBJECT SITE
t•3
� R -2 P•I
L OCA
Ml AP
P-.
P•
'.. R-3
C
C'�
�• G
DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1985
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PATRICK P. IMPORTUNA, DIRECTOR
COMP'.UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING/ADOPTION OF CURRENT UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (1982 ED.)/
UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE (1982 ED.) /UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE (1982 ED.)/
NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (1984 ED.) /AND AMENDMENT OF LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL
CODE AS APPROPRIATE
RAC KC:R(nTTNn
The attached ordinances are respectfully submitted for the purpose of updating
our adopted Building Code Ordinances. The need for adoption of these ordinances
is multi -fold.
First, Section 17958, Health and Safety Code, State of Calfornia, mandates that:
"Except as provided in Section 17958.8 and 17958.9, after March 7, 1983 any city
or county shall have one (1) year from the effective date of any changes in the
provisions adopted pursuant to Section 17922 and published in the State Building
Standards Code or the other regulations thereafter adopted pursuant to Section
17922 in which to amend, add, or repeal ordinances or regulations to impose the
same requirements as are contained in the provisions adopted pursuant to Section
17922 ----------- If any city or county does not amend, add, or repeal ordin-
ances or regulations to impose such requirements or make changes or modifica-
tions in such requirements upon express findings by such time, the provisions
published in the State Building Standards Code or the other regulations promul-
gated pursuant to Section 17922 shall be applicable to it." The section then
continues to list all of the building codes listed in the attached ordinance.
The second reason, and, in staff's opinion, the most important, is for the City
of Lynwood to be able to assure its citizens that the buildings and structures
constructed are of the latest and best structural design and construction en-
compassing the highest quality materials available. The city has already adopt-
ed the 1982 Uniform Fire Code which coincides with the 1982 Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Codes and the 1984 National Electric Code.
Building Division staff has reviewed the current code editions and is request-
ing that Council adopt them, along with their amendments.
RECOMMENDATIONS
At the conclusion of Public Hearing, Council waive reading and introduce
ordinances for the purpose of adopting four (4) new codes.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD PROVIDING FOR THE PRO-
TECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH, LIFE AND SAFETY THROUGH ADOPTION
REFERENCE OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (1982 ED.) AND
"STANDARDS ", ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART-
MENT AS THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, ADDING AN APPEAL PROCE-
DURE, EXEMPTING CERTAIN MINOR WORK, SETTING A FEE SCHEDULE,
AMENDING SECTIONS 8 -1, 8 -2, 8 -3, 8 -4., AND 8 -5, OF THE LYNWOOD
CITY CODE, AND REPEALING ALL OTHER ORDINANCES OR PARTS THERE-
OF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 8 -1 of the Lynwood City Code is amended to read as
follows:
Section 8 -1 . Building Code, Established.
A. There is hereby adopted by the City Council for the purpose of pre-
scribing regulations to provide minimum standards to safeguard life and limb,
health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design,
construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and main-
tenance of all buildings and structures within the city and certain equipment
specifically regulated herein, that certain code known as the Uniform Building
Code (1982 Ed.) together with the appendix therein contained, and the Uniform
Building Code Standards (1982 Ed.) promulgated and published by the Internation-
al Conference of Building Officials, except section 202(c) (right of entry),
203 (unsafe buildings and structures), and 204 (Board of Appeals), and Table
304 -A (permit fees) thereof and except also such portions thereof as are here-
inafter deleted, modified, amended, or added. Not less than three copies of
said Code and Standards are filed in the office of the City Clerk. The same,
with the exceptions, deletions, modifications, amendments, and additions afore-
said, are hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length here-
in. From and after the date on which this ordinance shall take effect, the
Building Official, as Director of the Community Development Department, is
authorized to administer and enforce these regulations, and the provisions
thereof shall be controlling within the limits of the city.
B. Any reference in the Uniform Building Code or in the City Code or
City Ordinance (1) to Building Official shall mean the Director of Community
Development or his duly appointed representative, (2) to Director shall mean
the Director of Community Development, (3) to City Manager shall mean the
City Manager or his duly appointed representative, (4) to UBC shall mean the
1982 edition of the Uniform Building Code.
SECTION 2 . Section 8 -2 of the Lynwood City Code is amended to read as
follows:
Section 8 -2 . Building Code, Additions, Amendments and Modifications.
A. Right of Entr Whenever necessary to make an inspection to enforce
any of the provisions of this Code, or whenever the Building Official or his
authorized representative has reasonable cause to believe that there exists
in any building or upon any premises, any condition which makes such building
or premises unsafe as defined in Paragraph (B) of this section, the Building
Official or his authorized representative may enter such building or premises
at all reasonable times to inspect the same or to perform any duty imposed
Any other provision herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding,
the Building Official or his authorized representative may enter a building or
premises to inspect the same or to perform any duty imposed upon the Building
Official by this Code without the necessity of first obtaining an inspection
warrant whenever said Building Official reaonably believes that said building
or premises is so damaged or defective as to cause an immediate danger to
human life or an immediate hazard to public safety.
No person shall hinder or prevent the Building Official or his autho-
ized representative while in the performance of his duties from entering upon
and into any and all buildings or premises within the city.
B. Unsafe Buildings
(a) Whenever the Building Official determines by inspection that a
building or structure is (i) structurally unsafe; (ii) not provided with ade-
quate egress; (iii) a fire hazard; (iv) otherwise dangerous to human life; or,
(v) in relation to existing uses, a hazard to safety or health or public wel-
fare, by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence or
abandonment, as specified in the Uniform Building Code (1982 Ed.) or any other
effective ordinance, said building or structure is for the purpose of this
Chapter, an unsafe building. All such unsafe buildings are hereby declared
to be public nuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demoli-
tion or removal in accordance with the procedure specified in this Code.
(b) The Building Official shall examine or cause to be examined
every building or structure or portion thereof reported as dangerous or damaged,
and if he finds any such building or structure to be an unsafe building as
defined in this section, the Building Official shall give to the party con-
cerned written notice stating the defects therein. This notice may require
the owner or person in charge of the building or premises, within 48 hours,
to commence either the required repairs or improvements or demolition and
removal of the building or structures or portions thereof, and all such work
shall be completed within 90 days from date of notice, unless otherwise stipu-
lated by the Building Official. If necessary, such notice shall also require
the building, structure, or portion thereof to be vacated forthwith and not
reoccupied until the required repairs and improvements are completed, inspected,
and approved by the Building Official.
Service of such notice shall be by personal service or by registered
or certified mail upon every party concerned. In the event the Building
Official, after reasonable effort, is unable to serve the notice as specified
above, service shall be effected by posting on the structure a copy of the
notice.
The designated period within which the owner or person in charge
is required to comply with such notice shall begin as of the date he receives
such notice by personal service or registered or certified mail. If such
notice is by posting, the designated period shall begin 10 days following the
date of posting. The failure of any owner or other person to receive such no-
tice shall not affect in any manner the validity of any proceedings taken here-
under.
A person notified to vacate an unsafe building by the Building
Official shall vacate within the time specified in the order.
The Building Official may file with the office of the County Recorder
a declaration that the building described has been inspected and found to be
an unsafe building, as defined in this section, and that the owner thereof
has been so notified. After all required work has been completed, the Building
Official shall file with the office of the County Recorder a notification
terminating the above declaration.
As used in this section, "party concerned ", means
any, in real or apparent charge and control of the premises
owner, the holder of any mortgage, trust deed or other lien
record, the owner or holder of any lease of record, the rec
other estate or interest in or to the building or structure
which it is located.
the person, if
involved, the record
or encumbrance or
)rd holder of any
or the land upon
(c) The Building Official shall cause to be posted at each entrance
to such building a notice to read: "DO NOT ENTER - UNSAFE TO OCCUPY ". Such
notice shall remain posted until the required repairs, demolition, or removal
are completed. Such notice shall not be removed without written permission
of the Building Official and no person shall enter the building except for the
purpose of making the required repairs or demolishing the building.
(d) The party concerned or the Building Official may request a pub-
lic hearing regarding the unsafe condition and /or nuisance condition of the
buildings or structures. Such request and hearing shall follow the same pro-
cedures as stated in Section 8.4.
(e) Unsafe or nuisance buildings shall be abated by repair or demo-
lition and such proceedings shall follow the procedures of abatement as con-
tained in Chapter 8, Section 8 -71 of the Lynwood City Code.
C. Inspections The Building Official may refuse to allow any or all
of the public utilities to be connected to any building or structure until
a final inspection and approval has been issued.
D. Work Exempted The following structures are exempted from all the
provisions of this ordinance in addition to those contained in Chapter 3 of the
Uniform Building Code (1982 Ed.) :
(1) Tents and similar cloth structures to be used on a temporary basis
(3 day maximum).
(2) Gantry cranes and similar equipment when not an integral part of
the building structure.
E. Fee Refunds All refunds for fees authorized by the Building Offi-
cial shall require approval by the City Manager.
F. Non - public Records Nothing herein shall be deemed to authorize
or permit the Building Official to reveal or furnish to any person except to
a duly authorized employee or officer of the city, any record of the city or
information from such record, which under the law does not constitute a public
record.
SECTION 3 . Section 8 -3 of the Lynwood City Code is amended to read as
follows:
Section 8 -3 . Building Code, Appeal.
(a) Within 30 days after the Building Official has rejected an
application for a permit or otherwise made a ruling adverse to the applicant,
the applicant may file a written appeal or request for a hearing with the City
Clerk stating in detail the reasons why the permit should be granted or the
ruling ahould be reversed or modified, notwithstanding the opinion of the Build-
ing Official to the contrary.
(b) Within 24 hours of the receipt of the written appeal of request,
the City Clerk will advise the Building Official and within the same time fix
the date and time for a hearing by the City Council which date must be not
more than 30 days from the date the appeal or request is filed. The City Clerk
shall give notice of said hearing to the applicant by registered mail and to
the Building Official in writing. The Clty Clerk will further cause a notice
of said hearing, describing the place, date, and time, to be posted on the
property involved and publish the same notice in a newspaper of general circu-
lation within the city at least five days prior thereto.
(c) At the place and time of hearing, the City Council shall examine
all data presented and consider all presentations by interested parties who
desire to be heard. The City Council shall make written findings of the evi-
dence as to whether or not the buildings or structures are unsafe and are a
nuisance as defined in this Code, and shall further make an order based upon
its findings.
(d) The provisions of this section 'shall not serve to terminate or
otherwise affect variances, permits, or other adjustments existing prior to
the adoption of this Code when so duly authorized by the City Council or the
Building Official.
SECTION 4 . Section 8 -4 of the Lynwood City Code is amended to read as
follows:
Section 8 -4 . Building Code, Fire Zones.
(a) For the purpose of this Code, the entire incorporated area of
the city is hereby declared to be and hereby established as a fire district,
and said fire district shall be classified in either of two fire zones which
shall be known and designated as Fire Zone 2 and Fire Zone 3. All land and
structures within the city included in Fire Zones 2 and 3 shall be restricted
by such zones in the manner prescribed by this Code. ,
(b) Fire Zone 2 shall include all territory within the city now or
hereafter zoned or used for commercial purposes pursuant to the city zoning
ordinances. All other parts of the city now or hereafter not so zoned shall
be included in Fire Zone 3.
SECTION 5. Section 8 -5 of the Lynwood City Code is amended to read as
follows:
Section 8 -5. Building Code, Violations and Penalties.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to
erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or
demolish, equip, use, occupy, or maintain any building or structure in the city,
or cause the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the pro-
visions of this Code.
(b) When any building or structure is maintained in violation of
this Code or in or in violation of any notice issued pursuant thereto, the
legal representative of the city shall institute any appropriate action nec-
essary or institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction in
order to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation.
(c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this Code or any order made thereunder, or failing to comply with any de-
tailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and approved thereunder
or with any certificate or permits issued thereunder, within the time fixed
shall, severally and for each violation and non - compliance respectfully be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than five hundred
dollars or by imprisonment for not more than one hundred eighty days, or by
both such fine and imprisonment.
The imposition of a penalty or penalties for any violation or non-
compliance shall not excuse said violation or non - compliance nor permit it to
continue. All persons incurring such a penalty or penalties shall be required
to correct or remedy such violations or non - compliance within a reasonable
time; and, when not otherwise specified, each ten days during which prohibited
conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application
of a penalty for violation of this Code shall not be held to prevent the enforced
removal of prohibited conditions.
SECTION 6 . The City Council hereby findsthat local conditions, relating
in particular to the cost of administering the City Building Code requirements,
necessitates the adoption by the City of a fee schedule which differs from
that set forth in the Uniform Building Code (1982 Ed.). Therefore Table No. 3 -A
of the Uniform Building Code is amended to read as follows:
TABLE NO. 3 -A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES
TOTAL VALUATION
FEE
$1.00 to $500.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$50,000.00 to $100,000.00
$100,001.00 and up
$50.00
$50.00 for the first $500.00 plus
$2.00 for each additional $100.00
or fraction thereof, to and includ-
ing $2,000.00.
$63.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus
$8.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000.00.
$245.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus
$6.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00.
$397.00 for the first $50,000.00 plus
$4.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$100,000.00.
$589.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus
$3.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof.
OTHER INSPECTION FEES:
1. Inspections outside of normal business
hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fee assessed under provision
Section 305(g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is
specifically indicated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
4. Plan review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Per Sec. 304(b)
-. P I-- T1_.3 F__
5. Additional plan review required by
changes, additions or revisions to
approved plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour) plus Consultant
costs as applicable
6. Special Permit Fee - temprary structures
and other permits not otherwise set forth
herein . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00
Such fees may be adjusted from time to time by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 7 . Any modification or alterations of the Uniform Building Code
(1982 Ed.) contained in this Ordinance are expressly found to be necessary as
an accomodation of the local administrative needs of the City of Lynwood and are
not intended to modify any substantive building or materials requirements of the
Uniform Building Code.
SECTION 8 . Severability If any sectioq, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any
person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its appli-
cation to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any
one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases,
or portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 9 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to
the passage of this ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in
the Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published
and circulated in the City of Lynwood.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held
on the day of , , and finally ordered published at a
regular meeting of said Council held on the day of ,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
ADDING CHAPTER 26, UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, TO THE CODE
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD THEREBY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, 1982 EDITION, AND REPEALING ALL
OTHER ORDINANCES OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 26 hereby is added to the Code of the City of Lynwood
to read as follows:
CHAPTER 26
UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE
Section 26 -1. Adoption of Uniform Plumbing Code by Reference
With the exceptions of additions and amendments hereinafter set forth in this
Chapter, there is hereby adopted by reference the following code for the City
of Lynwood:
Uniform Plumbing Code, 1982 Edition, with Appendices A, B, C, D, E,
G, H, and I, Copyright 1982 by the International Association of Plumbing and
Mechanical Officials, 5032 Alhambra Avenue, Los Angeles, California, and by
the International Conference of Building Officials, 5360 South Workman Mill
Road, Whittier, California.
Section 26 -2. Uniform Plumbing Code - Amendments, Additions and
Deletions Said Uniform Plumbing Code as adopted by Section 26 -1 is hereby
amended as follows:
(1) Part I, Administration, is hereby amended to read as follows:
(A) Right of Entry Whenever necessary to make an inspection to
enforce any of the provisions of this Code, or whenever the Director of the
Community Development Department or his authorized representative has reason-
able cause to believe that there exists in any buildings or upon any premises,
any conditions which makes such buildings or premises unsafe as defined in
Section 203 of the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition, the Director of the
Community Development Department or his authorized representative may enter
such buildings or premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same or to
perform any duty imposed upon the director of the Community Development Depart-
ment by this Code; provided however, that no such entry shall be made unless
an inspection warrant authorizing the same has first been issued.
Any other provisions herein contained to the contrary notwithstand-
ing the Director of the Community Development Department or his authorized
representative may enter a building or premises to inspect the same or to
perform any duty imposed upon the Director of the Community Development
Department by this code without the necessity of first obtaining an inspection
warrant whenever said Director resonably believes that said building or pre-
mises is so damaged or defective as to cause an immediate danger to human life
or an immediate hazard to public safety.
No person shall hinder or prevent the Director of the Community
Development Department or his authorized representative while in the per-
formance of his duties from anrprinv „nn —A .,.... .._A L ., j .
(B) Board of Appeals Within thirty (30) days after the Director
of the Community Development Department has rejected an application for a per-
mit or otherwise made a ruling adverse to the applicant, the applicant may
file a written appeal or request for a hearing with the City Clerk stating in
detail the reasons why the permit should be granted or the ruling should be
reversed or modified, notwithstanding the opinion of the Director of the Commun-
ity Development Department to the contrary.
(a) On or before the day next following the receipt of the written
appeal or request, the City Clerk shall advise the Director of the Community
Development Department and within the same time fix the date and time for a
hearing by the City Council, which date must not be more than thirty (30) days
from the date the appeal or request is filed. The City Clerk shall give notice
of said hearing to the applicant by registered mail and to the Director of the
Community Development Department in writing. The City Clerk shall further
cause a notice of said hearing, describing the.place, date, and time thereof,
to be posted on the property involved and published in a newspaper of general
circulation withing the city at least five (5) days prior thereto.
(b) At the place and time of hearing, the City Council shall examine
all data presented and consider all presentations by interested parties who
desire to be heard. The City Council shall make written findings of the evi-
dence as to whether or not the permit should be granted or the ruling reversed
or modified.
(c) The Provisions of this section shall not serve to terminate or
otherwise affect appeals, rulings, permits, or adjustments existing prior to
the adoption of this Code so duly authorized by the City Council or the
Director of the Community Development Department.
Section 26 -3 . That a new Section, to be known, numbered and desig-
nated as Section 308. Refund shall be and the same is hereby added to said
Chapter 3, Permits and Inspetion, and shall read as follows:
Section 308. Refund In the event that any person shall have ob-
tained a permit or paid a plan checking fee and no portion of the work or
construction covered by such permit shall have been performed or commenced
or such permit shall have been cancelled without any work having been done,
the permittee, upon presentation to the Administrative Authority of a request
therefor in writing shall be entitiled to a refund. All refunds shall require
approval by the City Manager.
Section 26 -4. Fees Before any permit required by this division is
granted, the person making application therefor shall pay to the City Clerk
a fee in an amount established by the resolution of the City Council.
Section 26 -5. Uniform Plumbing Code - Technical Codes Filed
in Office of City Clerk Three (3) full and complete printed copies of said
Code in book form were heretofore by this Council ordered filed in the Office
of the City Clerk of said Cit, open to public inspection; and pursuant to
said order, the said Uniform Plumbing Code, 1982 Edition (with its Appen-
dices) therein referred to was so actually filed in the office of said City
Clerk in the City Hall of said City, and open to public inspection, examin-
ation and use by the public.
Section 26 -6. Uniform Plumbing Code - Penalties Any person vio-
lating or failing to comply with any provision of this Code or committing
any act or omission to act declared to be a misdemeanor or unlawful by this
Code where no specific penalty is provided therefore, shall be punished by
fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisonment not exceed-
ing six (6) months, or both, such fine and imprisonment in the discretion
o f v h, n n, i-
Each day any violation of this Code or any other ordinance of the
City shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 2 . All previous Sections of the Lynwood City Code and all other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3 . Severabilit . If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any
person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance or its application to
other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared in-
valid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to
the passage of this ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the
Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and
circulated in the City of Lynwod.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on
the day of , 1985, and finally ordered published at a regu-
lar meeting of said Council held on the day of 1985.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
City Attorney
Patrick P. Importuna, Director
Community Development Department
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
ADDING CHAPTER 17A, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, TO THE CODE
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD THEREBY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE
UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, 1982 EDITION, AND REPEALING ALL
OTHER ORDINANCES OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1 . Chapter 17A hereby is added to the Code of the City of Lynwood
to read as follows:
CHAPTER 17A
UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE
Section 17A -1. Adoption of Uniform Mechanical Code by Reference
With the exception of additions and amendments hereinafter set forth in this
Chapter, there is hereby adopted by referenc the following code for the City
of Lynwood:
Uniform Mechanical Code, 1982 Edition, with Appendices A and B, Copy-
right 1982 by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials,
5032 Alhambra Avenue, Los Angeles, California, and by the International Confer-
ence of Building Officials, 5360 South Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California.
Section 17A -2. Uniform Mech anical Code - Amen dments. Additions anti
Deletions Said Uniform Mechanical Code as adopted by Section 17A -1 is hereby
amended as follows:
(1) Section 203 of Chapter 2, Organization and Enforcement, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
(a) Right of Entr Whenever necessary to make an inspection to
enforce any of the provisions of this Code, or whenever the Director of the
Community Development Department or his authorized representative has reason-
able cause to believe that there exists in any buildings or upon any premises,
any conditions which makes such buildings or premises unsafe as defined in
Section 203 of the Uniform Building Building Code, 1982 Edition, the Director
of the Community Development Department or his authorized representative may
enter such buildings or premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same
or to perform any duty imposed upon the Director of the Commumity Development
Department by this Code; provided however, that no such entry shall be made
unless an inspection warrant authorizing the same has first been issued.
Any other provisions herein contained to the contrary notwithstand-
ing the Director of the Community Development Department or his authorized
representative may enter a building or premises to inspect the same or to
perform any duty imposed upon the Director of the Community Development
Department by this code without the necessity of first obtaining an inspection
warrant whenever said Director reasonably believes that said building or pre-
mises is so damaged or defective as to cause an immediate danger to human life
or an immediate hazard to public safety.
No person shall hinder or prevent the Director of the Community
Development Department or his authorized representative while in the performance
of his duties from entering upon and into any and all buildings or premises
within the city.
Section 203. Board of Appeals Within thirty (30) days after the
Director of the Community Development Department has rejected an application
for a permit or otherwise made a ruling adverse to the applicant, the appli-
cant may file a written appeal or request for a hearing with the City Clerk
stating in detail the reasons why the penit should be granted or the ruling
should be reversed or modified, notwithstanding the opinion of the Director
of the Community Development Department to the contrary.
(a) On or before the day next following the receipt of the written
appeal or request, the City Clerk shall advise the Director of the Community
Development Department and within the same time fix the date and time for a
hearing by the City Council, which date must no be more than thirty (30) days
from the date the appeal or request is filed. The City Clerk shall give notice
of said hearing to the applicant by registered-mail and to the Director of the
Community Development Department in writing. The City Clerk shall further cause
a notice of said hearing, describing the place, date, and time thereof, to be
posted on the property invived and published in a newspaper of general circu-
lation within the city at least five (5) days'prior thereto.
(b) At the place and time of hearing, the City Council shall examine
all data presented and consider all presentations by interested parties who
desire to be heard. The City Council shall make written findings of the evi-
dence as to whether or no* the permit should be granted or the ruling reversed
or modified.
(c) The provisions of this section shall not serve to terminate or
otherwise affect appeals, rulings, permits, or adjustments existing prior to
the adoption of this Code when so duly authorized by the City Council or the
Director of the Community Development Department.
(d) That a new Section, to be known, numbered and designated as
Section 308. Fees and Refunds shall be and the same is hereby added to said
Chapter 3, Permits and Inspection, and shall read as follows:
Section 308 -1. Fees Before any permit required by this division is
granted, the person making application therefor shall pay to the City Clerk
a fee in an amount established by the resolution of the City Council.
Section 308 -2. Refund In the event that any person shall have ob-
tained a pemit or pad a plan checking fee and no portion of the work or
construction covered by such permit shall have been performed or commenced
of such permit shall have been cancelled without any work having been done,
the permittee, upon presentation to the Administrative Authority of a request
therefor in writing shall be entitled to a refund. All refunds for fees
authorized by the Building Official shall require approval by the City Manager.
Section 17A -3. Uniform Mechanical Code - Technical Codes Filed
in Office of City Clerk Three (3) full and complete printed copies of said
Code in book form were heretofore by this Council ordered filed in the Office
of the City Clerk of said City, open to public inspection; and pursuant to
said order, the said Uniform Mechanical Code, 1982 Edition (with its Appen-
dices A and B) therein referred to was so actually filed in the office of said
City Clerk in the City Hall of said City, and open to public inspection, exam-
ination and use by the public.
Section 17A -4. Uniform Mechanical Code - Penalties Any person
violating or failing to comply with any provision of this Code or committing
any act or omission to act declared to be a misdemeanor or unlawful by this
Code where no specific penalty is provided therefore, shall be punished by
fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00) or imprisonment not exceed-
ing six (6) months, or both, such fine and imprisonment in the discretion of
the court.
SECTION 2 . All previous Sections of the Lynwood City Code and all other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3 . Severability_ If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any
person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance or its application to
other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact than any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared in-
valid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to
the passage of this ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the
Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and cir-
culated in the City of Lynwood.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on
the day of , 1985, and finally ordered published at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the day of , 1985.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
City Attorney
Patrick P. Importuna, Director
Community Development Department
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
PROVIDING FOR THE PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH, LIFE AND
SAFETY THROUGH ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE, 1984 EDITION, ESTABLISHING THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AS THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, ADD-
ING AN APPEAL PROCEDURE, AND REPEALING ALL OTHER ORDINANCES
OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1 . Chapter 11 of the Code of the City of Lynwood hereby is amended
to read as follows:
CHAPTER 11
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 1984 EDITION
Section 11 -1 National Electrical Code, 1984 Edition
There is hereby adopted by the City Council for the purpose of pre-
scribing regulations to provide minimum standards to safeguard life and limb,
health, property, and public welfare by regulation and controlling the design,
construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location and mainten-
ance of all buildings and structures within the city, and certain equipment
specifically regulated herein, that certain code known as the National Elec-
trical Code, 1984 Edition, promulgated and published by the National Fire Pro-
tection Association under the auspices of the American National Standards
Institute, except such portions thereof as the hereinafter deleted, modified,
amended, or added. Not less than three copies of said Code and Standards are
filed in the office of the City Clerk. The same, with the exceptions, dele-
tions, modifications, amendments, and additions aforesaid, are hereby adopted
and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein. From and after the
date on which this chapter shall take effect, the Director of the Community
Development Department as head of the Community Development Department, as
authorized to administer and enforce their regulations, and the provisions
thereof shall be controlling within the limits of the city.
Section 11 -2 National Electrical Code, 1984 Edition, Additions
Amendments, and Modifications.
The National Electrical Code, 1984 Edition, as adopted by this
chapter, is hereby further amended, modified, or deletions made therefrom,
in the following respects:
a) Right of Entry Whenever necessary to make an inspection to
enforce any of the provisions of this Code,or whenever the Director of the
Community Development Department or his authorized representative has reason-
able cause to believe that there exists in any buildings or upon any premises,
any conditions which makes such buildings or premises unsafe as defined in
Section 203 of the Uniform Building Code, 1984 Edition, the Director of the
Community Development Department or his authorized representative may enter
such buildings or premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same or
to perform any duty imposed upon the Director of the Community Development
Department by this Code; provided however, that no such entry shall be made
No person shall hinder or prevent the Director of the Community De-
velopment Department or his authorized representative while in the performance
of his duties from entering upon and into any and all buildings or premises
within the city.
Section 11 -3 National Electrical Code, 1 984 Edition, Appeal.
a) Within thirty (30) days after the Director of the Community De-
velopment Department has rejected an application of a permit or otherwise made
a ruling adverse to the applicant, the applicant may file a written appeal or
request for a hearing with the City Clerk stating in detail the reasons why the
permit should be granted or the ruling should be reversed or modified, notwith-
standing the opinion of the Director of the Community Development Department to
the contrary.
b) On or before the day next following the receipt of the written
appeal or request, the City Clerk shall advise the Director of the Community
Development Department and within the same time fix the date and time for a
hearing by the City Council, which date must not be more than thirty (30) days
from the date the appeal or request is filed. The City Clerk shall give notice
of said hearing to the applicant by registered mail and to the Director of
Community Development in writing. The City Clerk shall further cause a notice
of said hearing, describing the place, date, and time thereof, to be posted on
the property involved and published in a newspaper of general circulation within
the city at least five (5) days prior thereto.
c) At the place and time of hearing, the City Council shall examine
all data presented and consider all presentations by interested parties who
desire to be heard. The City Council shall make written findings of the evi-
dence as to whether or not the permit should be granted or the ruling reversed
or modified.
d) The provisions of this section shall not serve to terminate or other-
wise affect appeals, rulings, permits, or adjustments existing prior to the
adoption of this Code when so duly authorized by the City Council or the
Director of the Community Development Department.
Section 11 -4 National Electrical Code, 1984 Edition, Violations
and Penalties
a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect,
construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish,
equip, use, occupy, or maintain any building or structure in the city, or cause
the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of
the National Electrical Code adopted by this article.
b) When any building or structure is maintained in violation of
said National Electrical Code in violation of any notice issued pursuant thereto,
the legal representative of the city shall institute any appropriate action
necessary or institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction in
order to prevent, restrain, correct or abate the violation.
c) Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of said National Electrical Code or any order made thereunder, or failing to
comply with any detailed statement of specifications or plans submitted and
approved thereunder, within the time fixed shall, severally and for each viola-
tion and non - compliance respetively be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by
a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or by imprisonment for
not more than one hundred eighty (180) days, or both such fine and imprison-
ment.
Section 11 -4. Refund In the event that any person shall have ob-
= tained a permit or paid a plan checking fee and no portion of the work or
The imposition of a penalty or penalties for any violation or non-
compliance shall not excuse said violation or non - compliance nor permit it to
continue. All persons incurring such a penalty such a penalty or penalties
shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or non - compliance with-
in a reasonable time; and, when not otherwise specified, each ten (10) days
during which prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate
offense. The application of a penalty for violation of said National Electrical
Code shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
SECTION 2 . All previous Sections of the Lynwood City Code and all other
ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3 . Severability If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any
person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance or its application to
other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or
more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared in-
valid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 4 . The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to
the passage of this ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the
Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and cir-
culated in the City of Lynwood.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on
the day of , 1985, and finally ordered published at a regular
meeting of said Council held on the day of , 1985.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
1 4�__ A
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patrick P. Importuna, Director, Community Development
SUB EC`T: REQ= FOR CITY IRAN TO THE ALAMEDA
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT' AREA
NW-WO
To request that City Council approve a $450,000 loan to the Lynwood
Redevelopment Agency for administrative expenses and overhead in the
Alameda Project Area.
FACTS:
1. The Redevelopment Agency recieves the tax increment revenue generated
by a Redevelopment Project only to the extent that it has incurred
debt in that Project Area. A loan fran the City to the Agency to
be used to pay administrative expenses of the Alameda Project Area
could constitute a valid debt of the Agency.
2. In September of 1980 the City of Lynwood, by Resolution 80 -91,
established an Administration Fund for the Alameda Project Area
Monies annually appropriated by the City Council for Administration
expenses of the Agency are to be retained in the City Treasury
in a special Administration Fund, and upon approval of the Agency,
money is to be drawn from that fund to meet the administration
expenses of the Agency. The money appropriated for Agency adminis-
tration expenses is considered a loan to the Agency, to be repaid
to the City with interest. The appropriated amount plus accrued
interest, being a valid debt of the Agency's Alameda Project Area,
is to be repaid fran tax increment revenues generated by that Project
Area.
3. The administrative expenses of the Agency for the Alameda Project
Area is included in the City's Annual Budget as a revenue item, and
in the Agency's Annual Budget as an Administration Expense (Reimbursement
to the City) .
4. On April 17, 1984 the City of Lynwood, by Resolution 84 -39 loaned
$100,000 to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency for administrative
expenses in the Alameda Project Area. That loan was subsequently
payed back to the City with interest.
5. Agency staff find it necessary at this time to secure $450,000 for
the administrative expenses and overhead of the Lynwood Redevelopment
Agency Alameda Project Area.
6. The attached resolution of the City Council approves a loan of
$450,000 to the Agency. The loan is executed with a Pranissory
Note. The term of the loan is open - ended, but requires that the
Agency repay the loan to the City as Alameda tax increment becomes
available. The Agency may, however, subordinate the City's loan
to any future bond issue or to repayment of other indebtedness
in the Alameda Project Area. The loan is to be repaid with interest
at the maximum rate permitted by law.
ANALYSIS AMID CONCLUSION:
The Agency has in the past obtained loans from the City in order to cover the
acluinist.rative expenses and overhead of the Agency's Projects Areas. These
loans have been considered valid debts of the Agency and have been repaid
from tax increment revenues generated by said project areas. Therefore, the
requested loan is an appropriate mechanism to finance the administrative expenses
and overhead costs incurred in operating the Alameda Project Area.
RBCOM AMATION
Staff respectfully requests that City Council approve the attached Resolution
authorizing a $450,000 loan to the Redevelopment Agency for the Alameda
Project Area.
MOLUTION 1\
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD APPROPRIATING FUNDS AS A LOAN TO
THE LYE W30D REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 33610 et seq. of the Health and
Safety Code of the State of California, a City Council may appropriate to a
redevelopment agency s_:ch amounts as the Council deems necessary for the ad-
ministrative expenses and overhead of the agency; and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid sections permit such amounts to be paid to
a redevelopment agency as a loan to be repaid upon such terms and conditions
as she City Council may provide; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby determines
that the sum of $450,000 is and will be necessary for the administrative
expenses and overhead of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency Alameda Project
Area,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood hereby
does resolve as follows:
Section 1 . The sum of $450,000 hereby is appropriated as a loan
to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency from the General Fund of said city to the
Lynwood Redevelopment Agency, and shall be used for administrative expenses
and overhead. In addition, the common understanding and usual interpretation
of the term, "administrative expense" includes, but is not limited to, expenses
of redevelopment planning and dissemination of redevelopment information.
S ection 2 . The money appropriated by this resolution is to be
paid to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency as a loan to be repaid to the City
of Lynwood as follows:
(a) Repayment shall be made from and to the extent that funds
are available to Agency for such purpose pursuant to
California Health and Safety Code, Section 33670 or from
other sources; provided, however, that Agency shall have
the sole exclusive right to pledge any such sources of
funds to the repayment of other indebtedness incurred by
Agency in carrying out the redevelopment project.
(b) The obligation for repaymient shall bear interest until
repayment is made at the maximum rate permitted by law.
(c) Although the parties recognize that payment may not occur
for a few years and that repayment may also occur over a
period of time, it is the express intent of the parties that
City shall be entitled to repayment of the expenses incurred
by City under this Agreement, consistent with Agency's
financial ability, in order to make City whole as soon as
practically possible.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1985.
JOHN D. BYORK, Mayor
C'i i-v of T. -,rnuryv�
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Patrick P. Importuna, Director
Department of Community Development
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW AND REPORT ON GENERAL PLAN
P ROP OS AL:
The Lynwood Municipal Code, Section 25 -31.3, requires that the General
Plan be reviewed annually by the Director of the Community Develop-
ment Department. The Code further requires that the Director pre-
pare an annual report containing recommendations for revisions to or
amendments to the General Plan. Additionally, Section 65400 of the
State of California Government Code requires that the planning
division submit an annual report to the City Planning Commission for
review and recommendations. The report is then submitted to the City
Council incorporating any recommendations and explaining the status of
the General Plan and progress in its implementation.
FACTS
The Lynwood General Plan, adopted in 1977, consists of the following
nine (9) mandatory elements: 1) Community Safety, 2) Noise, 3)
Open Space, 4) Conservation, 5) Housing, 6) Circulation, 7) Scenic
Highways, 8) Land Use, 9) Seismic Safety.
The General Plan has undergone several amendments since its adoption
including the addition of a Recreation Element in 1982 and a complete
revision of the Housing Element in 1984. The Housing Element must be
updated or revised every five years. The Draft Housing Element has been
submitted to the State of California Housing and Community Development
Department for comments and certification; a response is expected in
mid - February 1985 after which the document will be submitted to the City
Council for adoption.
During 1984 several amendments to the Land Use Element were adopted. These
amendments reflecting the City Council adopted changes to the General
Plan's land use designation are listed below and are shown on the map
identified as attachment A.
Approved Land Use Changes
Case No. From
84026 P -1 (Automobile
Parking)
To
R -1 (Single- Family Residential)
84043 R -1 (Single Family
Residential)
R -3 (Multi - Family Residential)
84062 R -1 (Single- Family R -2 (Townhouse and Cluster Housin
Residential
The General Plan establishes the framework for guiding development within
the City. Future land use planning efforts depend upon the City's ability
.-.. ..G F.... .., ....1.. �...- 7.. —.. —r rL ., n___�_l nit __ rm_____ ____ _______ � � •
-2-
A. ZONING
Zoning is considered the primary tool for implementing
the General Plan. The establishment of zoning districts
coupled with corresponding development standards provides
the criteria and implementation mechanism by which the
utilization of land in the City is in concert with the
broader objectives of the General Plan.
The Zoning Ordinance establishes the use of discretionary
permits and site specific review procedures as definitive
methods for supporting and enhancing the goals and objec-
tives of t'-.e General Plan. Site plan review, conditional use
permits, changes of zone and the abatement of non - conforming
uses are techniques which can be utilized under the Ordinance.
The following procedures were utilized during 1984 as a means
of maintaining consistency with the General Plan.
Procedure
Zone Change
Conditional ?'se Permit
Number of Cases
101
27
Site Plan Review and Approval 26
In addition, a pre- zoning was conducted relative to approximately
eighty (80) acres in the north western portion of the city. This area
is being considered for possible annexation; determination of this
action has not been completed.
As needs of the community change, the regulation mechanisms must be
modified to address the changes and be able to respond to them effectively
and positively. To this end changes in the zoning ordinance often are
vehicle by which the response is manifest. To allow the Community
Development Department sufficient opportunity to prepare new ordinances
several moratoriums were enacted until the revisions were prepared. The
moratoriums imposed are:
1. `loratorium on the establishment of churches in the commercial
zones.
?. `!oratorium on the off - premises sale of alcoholic beverages.
3. `!oratorium on the conversion of residential uses to condominiums,
co -ops or cooperatives.
in addition, an amendment to the Zoning Code in relation to fences and walls
aas approved. The amendment requires a permit for installation of a fence
� masonry wall and centralizes and simplifies the standards pertaining to
'_J. S�- 3DICISION REGULATIONS
The process of subliving land has a substantial effect on the
development of a City; the division of land is one of the most
irreversible actions that a local government can undertake. Once
approved, lot lines become difficult to modify even though the
State of California.
Subdivision '`!ap Set provides cities the authority to regulate
-3-
The City approved the following subdivision actions in 1984:
Action
Lot Line Adjustment
Number of Cases
1
Tentative Parcel Map Approvals 1
C. SPECIFIC PLANS
Specific Plans represent refinements to the General Plan.
They are useful planning tools for areas expected to under-
go either public or private redevelopment (or in many cases
development at new intensity or character). Specific Plans
describe in detail how an area is expected to be developed
complete with criteria and requirements.
Although no new specific plans were initiated in 1984, it is
expected that this technique will be utilized for several
areas in 1985, expecially in these sections of the City which
are targeted for redevelopment.
D. BUILDING AND HOUSING CODES
The City adopted the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform
Plumbing Code; the Uniform Mechanical Code, the National
Electrical Code and the State of California Housing Code. These
codes regulate building and safety. During 1984, an aggressive
program of Code Enforcement was maintained, concentrating on
violations and potential violations within the residential,
commercial and manufacturing areas of the City. This program
is a means of implementing the Housing Element and Community
Safety Element of the General Plan.
E. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Capital Improvements Program is a tool which can be used to
implement the Land Use, circulation and Recreation Elements of the
General Plan. Included are programs such as street and sidewalk
improvements, park improvements, development of public facilities
and landscaping programs. The following is a listing of the
capital improvement projects undertaken in 1984:
1117)LIC `:'ORKS DEPARTMENT
STOR.`' DRAIN AT 112th STREET AND SANTA FE AVENUE
The project involved the construction of a catch basin at the easterly end
of 112th Street and an 18" reinforced concrete pipe drain from the catch
asin to an existing storm drain on Santa Fe Avenue.
Cost: $27,464.41
Start Date: 12/01/83
Completion Date: 02/06/84
REROOFING OF FATE ?IAN HALL
Tl,v nrnivrt invnlveci the reroofing of the Bateman Hall complex and re-
-4-
STREET IMPROVEMENTS - SAN LUIS AVENUE
The project involved the reconstruction of A.C. Pavement on San
Luis Avenue and the construction of a concrete bus pad layover
zone for RTD buses.
Cost: $75,967.21
Start Date; 01/09/84
Completion Date: 02/10/84
SLURRY SEAL - VARIOUS STREETS
The project involved the slurry sealing of various streets through-
out the City.
Cost: $48,989.16
Start Date: 01/13/84
Completion Date: 01/23/84
ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
The project involved the reconstruction of the first alley cast
of Atlantic Avenue between Los Flores Boulevard and Century
Boulevard.
Cost: $17,079.63
Start Date: 01/11/84
Completion Date: 01/24/84
F. REDEVELOPMENT
Redevelopment is one of the most powerful tools available
to local governments to implement their General Plans.
In instances where the private sector alone is unable or
unwilling to assemble lands and reinvest the necessary
capital for revitalizing blighted, or underdeveloped areas,
the redevelopment process is a means of transforming a
deteriorated area into a more productive one.
An independent report on redevelopment activities within
the City of Lynwood was recently completed and made available
for review; the Annual Report of the Lynwood Redevelopment
Agency is included for the review of the Planning Commission.
G. REVISING AND AMTNDING THE GENERAL PLAIN
The general plan is a dynamic document because it is based on
community values and an understanding of existing and projected
conditions and needs, all of which continually change. Local
governments should plan for change by establishing formal
procedures for regularly monitoring, reviewing, and amending
the general plan. The portions of the plan with a short -term
focus, such as the implementation program, should be reviewed
annually and revised as necessary to reflect the availability
of new implementation tools, changes in funding sources, and
the results of monitoring the effectiveness of past decisions.
The entire plan, including the basic policies, should be
-5-
If the commission or council finds itself making frequent
piecemeal amendments, major defects may exist in the
general plan because values and needs may have altered
or the plan may be too inflexible and precise. In
these cases, the jurisdiction should not further erode
the plan through amendments. Instead, it should under-
take a major revision.
In reviewing proposals for general plan amendments,
local officials should remember that the general plan
is a policy document for the entire community and that
it may only be amended "in the public interest"
(Government Code Section 65356.1). In other words, the
plan should only be amended when the city, with
the support of a broad consensus, determines a change is
necessary, not merely because a property owner or group of
citizens desires the amendment. Every general plan
amendr..ent, additionally must be consistent with the rest of
the general plan or appropriate changes need to be made to
maintain consistency.
The City of Lynwood General Plan is nearing its tenth
year as the policy document guiding the City's growth process
and except for the Housing Element, has not been completely
and methodically revised to reflect changing patterns in the
growth of the community. Several "piecemeal "amendments have
been instituted to the plan but in light of the need to have a
viable, ambitious document, the Community Development Depart-
ment strongly recommends a complete major revision of the
entire General Plan be undertaken.
RE C01 IMENDATI ON
The following recommendations are suggested for consideration by the
Planning Commission:
1) Revise the entire General Plan with the following elements
included: land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space,
seismic safety, noise, scenic `Aghway and safety.
?) Prepare revisions to the Housing Element ensuring that its
programs, policies and procedures is consistent with an overall
update of the other elements.
3) Conduct a detailed revision of the Land Use Element to reflect
changing community needs and modifications in the Zoning Ordinance,
establishing a consistency between the two and actual land use.
�) Include the Century Freeway (I -105) into the circulation element
reflecting the impacts of the total transportation artery on the
intersecting and complementing street system. Coordinate this
element with the Land Use Element addressing changes in land uses
along the freeway and defining opportunities.
5) Restructure the Noise Element to reflect the impacts and solutions
to the Century Freeway.
6) Establish a Community Design Element to develop a consistent,
viable and distinctive community image incorporating the multiple
facets of design techniques and standards. Prepare a criteria of
standards for design in conjunction with the Zoning Ordinance.
1- 7- -
1 1 . (' 'I I',�i 11 � - � e � T' ��" .. .,u `, .�, .I ",. j..,'f .. ' i ". 'II "•� .i•I <•i I � I ' -�` 'l't N - 1:1
' ..,,• n, iL \, . ��± I " .�..,� i. :u.u. � 1 � •., = 1 r i� _ 1 I _ _ ,_, -_ _ - \ "�� F+, `t ' / .. � 1 ( ,t t.r. I I I " 17I I .+ie �7 l�� I�I7 rirl •, I 1
E , .. n u� � ��` � .t � \s " l • l °.� -- --�( e•.r 'rn',.!,°.°°° ( •., =a � ., � `_ f ..� �/7 C '• n II•�Ih., I r �� ' ]i I ( vl 1 /l !! �I +, ^�` \\ ;. I
fit
'
It 7
U-9 ,I ., ;�I_ , ^t_. �� � ���•' �, ( I / 1 I `�i_ 1,
ik
:j u
r 1 \\ `• .y..il 1 � �� .yvl� 1'h a •., \ ��`. i �l( i.i r �I •.. �., -� ( r r ,, � '1 <. ^r l ! IL I. � �l � -
,' � �� — — _�`� _,.[ q�.;r I� (�S _I -- ''���'.� � -' J -�{�� ' -- .:��.., ^ -. ��\, ' ;.. .1 ''i ��1, -,� �- .., '1..: `) . I , 1 •r �I �
4
I �` f I �l
�H ".. ti ., r' (1e .I� v ;�' �, �� "•'�
i, j , i/ I K -
m.iu � o ' � - :.._ - - --� -,� - - _ _ I + - (((( r, - ° i b..' - -• _ � !J �'. -• I. '. , ,t /;" , „ q� I, , � - r � •- j J i +, j I _�� +, � ^ -.
'l i '♦ _ ■.. � ' Ta: ^ - -- -�C�Ni 1 L ... , r c�eiiw _ _t _� � II 1,� �' '' � �m.v - � l� ,..� -ir ni-
- na�.au i t L - � . 1 �.�� `.+r��._ - -�-_ _ - -_ `�'-- --- -_ —_- �I � � • n �, � I � � I "._ran. � � � , , I . •s I ... � I • .
I f i s �. _� � - -- - JJJlll __- .1� - =•, s��• f •., - l ➢ I _ _ laa - _' t I! i" , n � 1�_ (
0
0
I T
— ork T
0 0 0 "N."K
0 0
- - — — -
6M
LEGEND
'RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMIt
t A
TJY F
ORSIVIA AML�
11117 WILL FA.- - LONE 4A wrolum CORI .. er
HIAV♦ COD AL ONE
D R r I,jk 7
IM MANIPFA+ WifllM "ItO
;:YlqTlMf-" 7nKllK1f-- ILA An
Lynwood Redevelopment Agency
ANNUAL REPORT
JULY 1 983 -JUNE 1 984
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
II. I`DEPENDE'V7r FINANCIAL AUDIT
III. PROTECT AREA "7
A. Project Description
B. Comparison of Achievements with Goals of the Previous
Year's Work Program
C. Work Program Including Goals
IV. ALA.%1EDA PROJECT
A. Project Description
B. Comparison of Achievements with Goals of the Previous
Year's Work Program
C. Work Program Including Goals
V. DESCRIPTION OF AGEti'CY' S ACTI`'ITIES AFFECTING HOUSING AND DISPLAM=
VI. REC0.%2aTDA':I0NS FOR NEEDED LEGISLATION
I. I \'TRODL'CTION
The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency implements and administers two
redevelopment projects: Project Area "A" and Alameda Project.
Project area maps have been included as attachment A at the end
of this report. The goal of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency
is the implementation of the redevelopment plans for both pro-
ject areas in a manner consistent with Agency and City policies,
including the removal of blight and blighting influences from the
project areas and replacement of these blighted conditions with
uses and development which will benefit the total community both
economically and socially.
In accordance with the reporting requirements listed in Section
33080 et. seq, of the Health and Safety Code,- -- the Lynwood Redevelop-
ment Agency has prepared an Annual Report to its legislative body
containing information regarding the direction and character of the
Agency's community revitalization activities. This report which
must be transmitted following Council review to the State's Depart-
ment of Housing and Community Development, contains the following
major elements:
• An independent financial audit for the previous fiscal year;
• An examination of the previous year's achievements and a com-
parison of these achievements with the goals of the previous
year's work program;
• A work program for the coming year, including goals;
• A description of the Agency's activities affecting housing
and displacement; and
• Recammendations for legislation for housing and community
development programs.
II. I`DEPENDE:\T FINANCIAL AUDIT
Section 33080.1(a) requires: "An independent financial audit report
for the previous fiscal year. 'Audit report' means an examination of,
and opinion on, the financial statements of the agency which present
the results of the operations and financial position of the agency.
Such audit shall be conducted in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards and the rules governing audit reports promulgated
by the State Board of Accountancy."
The Agency contracted with Lance, Soll and Lunghard, certified public
accountants, for an independent financial audit for the period July 1,
1983 through June 30, 1984. The audit has been completed and received,
and has been included in this report as Attachment B.
1
III. PROJECT AREA "A"
A. Project Description
Project Area "A ", first adopted in 1973, was officially amended
during the Agency's 1980 -81 fiscal year. The size of the Project
increased from 44 acres to 564 acres (See Attachment A). The
Project expansion primarily encompassed commercial and manufac-
turing uses. In addition, street right -of -ways, public land and
properties currently under the control of Caltrans are now included
in the Project.
Project Area acreage is detailed below:
Land Use
( Zonin g)
Existing
Residential
Single Family (R -1 & R -2) 2.94
(1-6 Units /Acre)
Townhouse /Cluster 0
(7 -14 Units /Acre (R -3)
Multiple Family 1.00
(15 -35 Units /Acre (R -3)
Commercial (CB -1, C -2, C -2A, C -3) 180.64
Industrial /Semi- Public 77.47
(General Plan designated
Freeway Right -of -Way /Buffer 0
(General Plan designated
Street Right - of-way 190.00
Total Acreage b64.43
As these acreage figures show, approximately 190 acres of the Amended
Area are street right -of -way. Of the remaining 374.43 acres, 44 were
in the original Project Area, 24.69 are owned by Caltrans, and public
and semipublic uses (St. Francis Medical Center, the City Park and
City Hall Complex) total 52.47 acres, leaving a balance of 253.27
acres of commercial and industrial property.
B. Canparison of Achievements with Goals of the Previous Year's
',tiork Program
GOAL:
Continue efforts to develop the proposed Commercial Center Site. Work
with developer to establish an acceptable site configuration, to secure
anchor market and drugstore tenants, and to come to terms on an accept-
able Disposition and Development Agreement by the end of the 1983 -1984
fiscal year.
-2-
ACHI EVDv ENT's :
In July of 1983, the Agency approved the Development Concept of the
Commercial Center Site and extended the Exclusive Negotiation Agree-
ment with the developer for 180 days in order to secure commitments
from anchor supermarket and drugstore tenants. In January 1984, the
Agency allowed the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement to expire as a
result of the developer's lack of progress in securing commitments
from anchor tenants. The Agency then directed staff to prepare a
list of interested developers for consideration. In March 1984 the
Agency selected the development proposal submitted by the Hopkins
Development Company out of the three most acceptable proposals. In
May 1984 the Agency and the developer executed an Exclusive Negotiation
Agreement to develop a neighborhood shopping center. The proposed
shopping center project is the first phase of the final development
of the 25 -acre Redevelopment Project Area '.A" Commercial Center Site.
This commercial development is to be known as Lynwood Towne Center.
The first phase is to be built on 8.03 acres and will consist of
94,000 square feet of retail space including a 40,000 square foot
supermarket, 18,000 square foot superdrug store, three restaurants
(5,000 sq. ft., 5,000 sq. ft. and 4,000 sq. ft. respectively) and
19,000 sq. ft. of ancillary side shops. The project will result in
a private investment of approximately $8 million and will employ
255 persons upon completion. In May 1984 the City applied for an
Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) in the amount of $1,150,000.
In June 1984 the developer had secured the commitment for an anchor drug-
store tenant and was actively pursuing negotiations to secure the
supermarket tenant.
CtMM
Continue to research all mechanisms for financing Project Area
activities.
ACHIEVD.n'IS :
The Agency continued to research and pursue all available means
of financin development.
1. In February of 1984 the Agency entered into an agreement
with Hark Briggs and Associates for services to assist
the City in obtaining funding from the Federal Urban
Development Action Grant (UDAG) Program for the develop-
ment of a shopping center in the Commercial Center Site.
In May of 1984 a LTDAG application for $1,150,000 was sub-
mitted to the Federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD).
2. In February of 1984 the Agency entered into an Agreement
with Hark Briggs and Associates for services to assist
the City in obtaining funding from the UDAG Program for
development of a shopping center on the northwest corner
of Atlantic Avenue and Imperial Highway (See Attachment C).
This shopping center was proposed by H & O Enterprises,
developer. On March 20, 1984, the Agency agreed to initiate
(1) the preparation of an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement
with the developer and (2) the preparation of service agree-
ments to obtain the necessary property, reuse and relocation
appraisals
3. In January 1984 the Agency authorized the issuance of tax
allocation bonds in an amount not to exceed $3 million in
order to finance a portion of the cost of development
activities in the Project Area. As of this date the hind
issue has not been sold.
GOAL:
Continue to encourage and assist rehabilitation of deteriorating
commercial, industrial, and residential structures.
ACHIEVEMENTS:
The City continues operation of its residential and commercial
rehabilitation programs. In fiscal year 1983 -84, 31 residential
rehabilitation projects were completed and two commercial projects
were completed.
The City also promotes commercial and industrial rehabilitation
through Site Plan Review and requirements imposed by the City's
Planning Commission as part of the Conditional Use Permit Process.
(These actions also respond to the Alameda Redevelopment Project
Goals)
GOAL
Continue to encourage and assist new residential development. Work
with Lewis Homes to come to terms on acceptable Disposition and
Development Agreement for a residential development project at
Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street by the end of the 1983 -84 fiscal
year. Provide relocation benefits to displaced persons as required
under state and federal law.
ACHIEVEME:'rS :
In March of 1984 Lewis Homes withdrew its proposal to develop 24
condominium townhomes at Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street. The
reason for the withdrawal was based on the findings of a market
study conducted by Lewis Homes and prompted by the slow absorption
rate for a similar product recently completed by the developer in
the neighboring city of Paramount. Said study indicated that the
market demand for the proposed product in Lynwood was extremely
low and not expected to improve in the near future. Despite this
setback the City has, however, continued its efforts to promote
residential development in the south Atlantic Avenue area. For
example, in June of 1984 the City initiated the processing of
permit approvals for the development of ten townhomes on a 18,000
square foot parcel at the corner of Atlantic Avenue and Arlington
Street. The developer requested a Conditional Use Permit, a General
Plan amendment and a density bonus. The City is expected to approve
the request. Although this project is not within the boundaries of
the Target Area, its completion will stimulate new development and
the upgrading of existing commercial and residential properties within
the Target Area in the south Atlantic Avenue area.
Mc
The City is currently co- sponsoring a proposed development of 80
units of senior housing with Saint Francis Medical Center. This
development is to be built in a Center -owned site. A development
proposal has been submitted to the State Department of Housing
and Community Development - Century Freeway Housing Replenishment
Program - and the City has committed $100,000 in Community Block
Grant funds in support of the Project. Additionally, the City
will provide fast track processing and staff assistance in support
of the proposed housing development.
C .�1�17ii
Diligently pursue all opportunities for redevelopment of the
blighted and underutilized areas along Atlantic Avenue, and in
the project Area as a whole.
ACHIEVEIIE S :
As indicated above the Agency is actively pursuing the development
of Lynwood Towne Center at Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial
Highway as well as the development of a shopping center on the
northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Imperial Highway. The
Agency and the shopping center's developer, H & O Enterprises,
are finalizing the details for execution of an Exclusive Negotia-
tion Agreement. The Agency has entered into an agreement for
services with :dark Briggs and Associates for the preparation and
submittal to HUD of a UDAG application in support of the project.
Additionally, the Agency has entered into service agreements with
several firms to obtain property reuse and relocation appraisals.
The proposed shopping center at Atlantic Avenue and Imperial
Highway will include the rehabilitation /conversion of an
existing food retail facility of approximately 20,000 square
feet, the construction of a 40,000 square foot food store, and
the construction of approximately 16,000 square feet of side
shops and two pads of approximately 4,300 and 2,700 square feet
respectively. The value of the private sector investments is
estimated at approximately $6.5 million. The completion of the
project will allow for the expansion and better location of an
existing major supermarket and the expansion of retail and office
space for the headquarters operation of a major hardware and con-
struction material supplier.
GOAL:
Continue efforts to provide and /or improve public facilities in
the Project Area. Specifically, complete the following CDBG -Jobs
Bill Funded Projects by the end of the 1983 -84 fiscal year:
Project Number Project Description
JB384
Community Center and
Natatorium Rehabilitation
JB385
Alley Reconstruction
JB387
Street Reconstruction
JB388
Community Center
(Bateman Hall)
Emergency Reroofing
-5-
ACHIEVMM :
All of the above referenced projects have been completed as of the
end of the 1983 -84 fiscal year. Furthermore, the City has initiated
additional public improvement projects in the Project Area. These
projects are being funded with CDBG funds and are described in
section C. 7. below.
C. "tiork Program Including Goals
1. Continue efforts to develop the proposed commercial center
site, Lynwood Towne Center. work with developer to establish
an acceptable site configuration and project development
specifications, and to secure anchor tenants, and come to
terms on an acceptable Disposition and Development Agreement
by the end of 1984 -85 fiscal year. Work with consultant to
secure UDAG funding in support of the project.
2. Continue efforts to develop the proposed shopping center
on the north-west corner of Atlantic Avenue and Imperial
Highway. Work with developer to establish an acceptable
development plan and come to terms on an acceptable D.D.A.
by the end of 1984 -85 fiscal year. Work with consultant
to secure UDAG funding in support of the project.
3. Continue to research all available programs and mechanisms
for financing development activities in Project Area including
the Enterprise Zones legislation (AB40 and AB514).
4. Continue to encourage and assist rehabilitation of deterio-
rating commercial, industrial and residential structures.
5. Continue to encourage and assist new residential development.
Work with Saint Francis Medical Center to secure funding
from the State Housing and Community Development Department -
Century Freeway Housing Replenishment Program for the develop-
ment of 80 assisted rental housing units for the elderly.
6. Continue efforts for redevelopment of the blighted and
underutilized areas along Atlantic Avenue and in the Project
Area as a whole.
7. Continue efforts to provide and to improve public facilities
in the Project Area. Specifically complete the following
CDBG - funded projects by the end of the 1984 -85 fiscal year:
Project Number Project Description
84C -386
Street Improvements -
Slurry Seals
Street Reconstruction -
Imperial Highway and
Alameda Street
ME
IV. ALAMEDA PROJECT
A. Project Description
The Alameda Project was adopted in December of 1975 and includes
a variety of industrial uses such as the Economic Resources Corporation.
Western Gear Corporation and a twenty -five (25) acre tire dump site -
the Desser Tire Property. Incre interest in Project Area develop-
ment is anticipated Aue to the proximity of the proposed Century
Freeway on the Project's northern border and the existence of a sub-
stantial amount of underutilized or vacant land. The existing zoning
for all parcels within the 170 acre Project is manufacturing.
B. Comparison of Achievement with Goals of the Previous Year's Work
Program.
GOAL:
Continue to encourage and assist development of the Economic Resources
Corporation (ERC) Industrial Park.
ACHIEVEMENTS:
In November of 1983, The Economic Resources Corporation (ERC) com-
pleted the off -site improvements for The Expansion Project of the
ERC Industrial Park. These off -site improvements consisted of the
construction of an interior street (Enterprise Place); widening of
Vona Boulevard; construction of street curbs, gutters, drive aprons;
and provision of lights, landscaping, underground utilities and fire
hydrant service to the building sites. The off -site improvements
will support development of 200,000 square feet of new industrial
space. The cost of said improvements, over $400,000, is being
reimbursed to ERC as tax increment funds generated by the project
become available to the Agency.
GOAL:
Continue efforts to facilitate development of vacant and under-
utilized land in Project Area. Specifically, work with the Desser
Tire and Rubber Company and with other developers proposing develop-
ment projects on the 25 -acre Desser Tire property which conforms
with the Redevelopment Plan for the Alameda Project Area.
:?CHIEF E'aL:�7S:
In March of 1984 the Lynwood- Alameda Corporation, developer for
the Desser Tire property, submitted Tentative Parcel Map No. 16174
for approval. The Lynwood - Alameda Corporation is proposing the
development of a railroad- oriented industrial park on the 25 -acre
site which is to be developed in three phases. In March 1984 the
Cargill Corporation submitted an application for Site Plan Review
for the development of a bulk sweetner transfer facility (railroad -
tanker truck) to be built on 4.85 -acre parcel on the northeast
corner of the Desser Tire Property. The building of the proposed
transfer station is considered phase 1 of the site development plan
for the industrial park.
-7-
In :larch of 1984 the City received a request from the Southern
Pacific Transportation Company to approve a franchise agreement
for the construction of a drill track and spur track into the
Desser Tire property. As of this date said franchise agreement
has been approved. In June of 1984, the Tentative Parcel Map
for the development of the industrial park vras approved.
GOAL:
Continue to research all mechanisms for financing Project Area
activities.
ACHIEVENM7S :
The Agency continued to research and pursue all available means
of financing development. Use of up to 4To of the City's annual
CDBG funding allocation is presently being considered for the
next three (3) fiscal year in association with tax increment
funds. The amount of CDBG funds is estimated in $1.25 to $1.15
million. These funds will be used for site acquisition for
public right- of-way purposes (Santa Fe Avenue - Bellinger Street
extension), and construction of off -site improvements such as
storm drains, streets, curbs and gutters.
C. Work Program Including Goals
1. Continue to encourage and assist development in the Economic
Resources Corporation Industrial Park.
2. Continue efforts to develop the proposed railroad - oriented
industrial park in the Desser Tire property. Work with
property owner, Lynwood - Alameda Corporation, and lessee,
Cargill Corporation, in completing the bulk sweetner trans-
fer facility, phase one of the development, by the end of
the 1984 -85 fiscal year. Work with the property owner to
secure tenants for phases two and three of the proposed
development and research potential for using CDBG funds for
partial defray of cost for offsite improvements such as
storm drains, construction of streets, curbs and gutters.
3. Continue to research all available programs and mechanisms
for financing development activities in Project Area including
the Enterprise Zones legislation (AB40 and AB514)
DESCRIPTION OF AGENCY'S ACTIVITIES AFFECTING HOUSING AND DISPLACEMENT
During the 1983 -84 fiscal year the Agency acquired a total of four (4)
parcels in the Project Area "A ", Commercial Center Site, for a sum of
5385,466. Tvo of the parcels consisted of unimproved land and the
other two had two (2) single family dwellings and commercial facilities
respectively. Both dwellings were tenant - occupied while the commercial
facilities were vacant. The Agency is currently leasing the dwellings
to the present tenants until such time the property in question is needed
for the development of the proposed Lynwood Towne Center. Thus, no
,.lisplacement of households and /or businesses resulted from this acquisition.
Upon the execution of the Disposition and Development Agreement with the
Hopkins Development Company, for the development of the Lynwood Towne
Center, the Agency will relocate the two affected households, demolish
the existing structures, clear and grade the land, assemble the parcels
for tract map recording and convey the property to the developer for the
construction of the shopping center.
VI. RECO"ZIENDATIONS FOR N=DED LEGISLATION
A. Business Inventory Payments
When AB 74 was originally enacted by the Legislature in 1979,
redevelopment agencies were to receive an annual payment from
the State (allocated by counties) to replace the revenues lost
by virtue of the elimination of the assessment and taxation of
business inventories. The payments to agencies were to be adjusted
annually to reflect inflation and population growth. In each
ensuing year except 1980 -81, the Legislature has reduced or
eliminated the annual adjustment to the business inventory payment.
We would urge the Legislature to restore the annual adjustments, which
would result in revenue allocations that more accurately reflect the
amounts that could have been received by the Agency in the absence of
the elimination of assessment and taxation of business inventories.
B. Right of Eminent Domain Within a Survey Area
It is suggested that the Legislature review Section 33391 et. seq.
of the California Redevelopment Law and consider the adoption of
language which clearly states the timing and conditions under which
a Redevelopment Agency may exercise its powers of eminent domain
within a survey area.
11411 I
�� I� I.'IIN�.
\ � r4.•N � � m �l ��� _
all
a,
x
17
114"Ifi 11 v
CITY OF
LYNWOOD
-9 n
IF —
,11yir � l� I
G f�
' l '/ � N � ''
Not
t 7 ' - % �.. �. � III �` X � ���,. � -�� ,. � .1
'� `� �f �' � �`� �_ I �" - � - _ l �1� ; 1, � �� �
At
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS I a/ ,� �
A hi�ll
. CU /,I fill
PROJECT AREA A �l' _� - ���,: I t t; ��:..,. �' � * ",1.. �_
�j ALAMEDA PROJECT AREA
I I I �
A T T A r% W KA P Al T n A
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
FEBRUARY 19, 1985
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PATRICK P. IMPORTUNA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE
DEFERRED PAYMENT LOAN LIMITS
REQUEST /PURPOSE
The purpose of this request is to raise Deferred Payment Loan limits
for owner - occupied single family dwellings from $10,000 to $15,000
for general repairs and removal of code violations and from $16,000
to $25,000 where a room addition is needed to alleviate overcrowded
conditions.
FACTS:
1. The Deferred Payment Loan (DPL) is a three percent (3 %) interest
simple loan. The loan, principal, and accumulated interest,
becomes due and payable in a lump sum ten (10) years after
execution of the Agreement or upon sale or transfer of the pro-
perty by any means, whichever results in the shortest time for
repayment. DPLs are loaned directly by the City to eligible
property owners through "an approved bank" or Bank of America.
All DPLs are secured with a recorded Deed of Trust.
2. Section 2.03,D of the Rehabilitation Program Regulations allows
for the waiver of the loan limits which may be approved in writing
by the Director of Community Development upon recommendation by
the Loan Review Committee. Since the loan limits of DPLs is
presently $10,000 for general repairs and removal of code viola-
tions and $16,000 where a room addition is needed to alleviate
overcrowded conditions, approximately 20% to 25% of the annual
cases processed received waivers to increase loans over the
current limits as a result of increased construction costs and
a high incidence of code violations.
3. The DPL is intended to avoid displacement of homeowners when the
property owners lack other means of financing the repairs and
improvements which must be made to their homes. DPLs are made
only to property owners who have not substantial resources to
make needed improvements and substantive evidence is on file to
make such determination.
4. The housing stock usually assisted by DPLs is charaterized by
homes built between the 1930's and the 1950's which contain
substandard electrical and plumbing systems, and have consider-
ably suffered as a result of deferred mainte ance and lilegai
additions and conversions. AGENDA ITEM
/f-D
compliance with Rehabilitation Standards do not count towards
meeting the City's goal and objectives of its Housing Assistance
Plan (HAP). This may impact on the amount of Community Develop-
ment Block Grant (CDBG) funds the City may receive in the future
years for Rehabilitation since the Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) would consider the units not fully re-
habilitated. Furthermore, partially improved property will not
have the same positive effect on the property values of adjacent
properties in the neighborhood as fully assisted property could.
Approximately 18 -20% of the rehabilitation cases assisted with
DPLs are under code enforcement action as a result of illegal
improvements and /or conversions. These cases are referred to
our department (Housing) by the Code Enforcement Program in an
attempt to assist them in obtaining code compliance, when house-
holds do not have the monies to correct the existing violations.
With the existing loan limits oftentimes the property owners
cannot bring their properties in full compliance with the
Municipal Code with the resulting legal hardships. In the past,
numerous waivers to these limits have been granted as per Council -
approved procedures allowing to increase the DPL amounts so that
all code violations and health /safety deficiencies could be
corrected. The granting of the waiver is becoming a corm -on occurrence
as a result of the increase in construction costs, thus requiring
an adjustment of the present loan limits.
RECOMMENDATION /FINDINGS :
To amend Section 2.05, DPL Amount and Terms of the Housing
Rehabilitation Regulations Manual to reflect the increase in the
DPL limits from $10,000 to $15,000 for general rehabilitation
work and from $16,000 to $25,000 where a room addition is needed
to alleviate overcrowded conditions for owner - occupied single
family dwellings.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD ADMENDING SECTION 2.05
ITEM F #1 OF THE HOUSING REHABILITATION
REGULATIONS MANUAL TO INCREASE THE DE-
FERRED PAYMENT LOAN LIMITS FROM $10,000
TO $15,000 FOR GENERAL REHABILITATION
AND FROM $16,000 TO $25,000 WHERE A ROOM
ADDITION IS NEEDED TO ALLEVIATE OVER-
CROWDED CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, Housing construction costs have risen over
30% in the last four years;
WHEREAS, present loan limits do not allow for suf-
ficient amounts to correct code violations to meet City's
Rehabilitation Standards; and
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the Housing Rehabilita-
tion Program to bring all assisted units into compliance with
the Rehabilitation Standards and extend their useful life not
less than twenty years;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of
Lynwood does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows:
Section 1. Section 2.05, Item F #1 of the Housing
Rehabilitation Regulations Manual is hereby amended to reflect
an increase in the Deferred Payment Loan limits from $10,000 to
$ 15,000 for general rehabilitation work and from $16,000 to
$ 25,000 where a room addition is needed to alleviate overcrowded
conditions.
Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
1985.
JOHN D. BYORK, Mayor
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
City of Lynwood
PATRICK P. IMPORTUNA, Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Community Development
DH - V; 7 EPA jAF 1
1CW
% 4DWFAS"L
MnYD"
PND MEMBERS
3F - HE !IT EUNLI.
QS-- WANE,
-.=., LIPELTDA
F "-BLI. "Xt Ell
C17 ENGINEEF-
SAW ETREFT
RE23NSTRUC710N
PROjE01'
c R3= 7 NO.
5- 5ol-)
To -awmTmenw tnat the :i= lo,-=' awarn a aortract tD the lowest
reL,.vs.tle Eidder for tne e Sage Street krz,azt-
W.;+ t"E �tt!CMVI PeSMIUtIM authoniz.nq an appropriati-n ni
1W el zind OF J_ 6_ On e,t
no Ncvembe- .0. 1 the wK. Wuncil anthorized Et a-+ t�
in er f Lido fnr *he afaramehf3oned project. NI-e "I-ms
�e, L asten bij patchages. On Febrtar, =. 1 the tid openi
hell : the affize of the Cit, lier'. Bins were rsca- en -on tn�
r- - Mcae - wnr 4 f in! swina �."ders-
HM224;
cam Dn .0p EtrurtIon lQmpavv
% zal 0�111 zompa!
A, em F7gineering
T , 0 zns E " �E 11stei rder the 7 1 9w4-8f CIF Scted e and
be. o... mced under tne in, T. .1_ Paid 'or 1151,:C . i4e
- 1 XmeFt ; - n2 Tnell�t= Pr_jaZ' YraX. 01.0�
a, ru e =&, wErF ani7re! when !art e� Et�eE" tree
we� E sel - L 1 Dr planting si.. L = S4ge Street ' T F a , a i se%:!
Fri, ae- astima is SIBS, rr. ; i'r._ audit -.nsl 4 _tqdiaq aa- W-.�
vc omp I , sh a d b , u 3 n q 1 n e pc. , d - F 1 "94 BE Sas "a 21 .- 1 wnw.-
,�el T the Sli-r, -as! irvect r 0 1-94-.1.
146, . : -C
�
H .. . at.-
n - A., -Miller iratr al. cting Compan, in the apparert low bidder. !-)
re4arence c•ech of preoicius performance re' •als a good reputation
and the necesaarV egperience. In view of the bid price and the
qualifications of the bidder, it is recommended that Sully-Miller
Lontracting Company be awarded the contract for the Le Sage
Street reconstructing pro
In addition to the award of the contract, an appropriation of
additional $35,000 from Gas Tan 213 Fund is required to cover
one cost nT the pro
FT QMMENEQTIYJ`
it is recommended that the Cit, Council award a contract to the
i j
C "1 fl
1 4 i i
Ili I ' I r
L I t 4
71
-1-1
Ii ..I • 1 L .1
I' CI r J
FI
I L J
r 1
rll
r.
La
I j
Ili
ILI
4
1
ti
I if
I tl
ILI
J
ILI
I' I
Ili
I
Ll I
Ll
lul
1
:E
Iftl
Li I
U Ilb
i i
U Y
IF
L1
T
!11 Ill 'T
- i T
- 1 T
u T
11
U 1
(ri
-.J
fri
F
,
16
a fri
Ill rrl
I'll
of
(1
j If 1-
r L i I
I f "11
a
- ,n
L L A
11)
'Cl
'U - 0
- 0
!A' 71
- 1
11 'n
Ul
I i
L J I
i rrl
n
rIl
fo r'' m
Ill rn
Cl Fri
El
ILI 17111
1 fli
F.
ILI
Tj li. 1
1.
1
LL "I,°
I V
],',A
1 a' ]�
a] D
fl. D.
(o D.
Si [•
ILI I:j
91 fu ID
5 1
0
j
QA Ll 1
13 (1)
— rj3
11 n?
J ki'l
1
D
[T]
10
Ljj
Ri
UI
I'l
Lil
1
I
ILI
LJ 1
73
j:,
I ., W
C t
J
171
:*1 ...r
ft
11-
-- .1 1 =f
ril
D IF
f
L I
�-j i1)
L1
1.1 Ill
01
di [I. Ill
11 1
1 ,11 Ill
0 (o
ILI
!If
-1.7 -
'0
1.-
QA
i
J
t
11
1 j
f t
A lill it j
Ill
Tj
f
L . 1
It,
ILI
ILI
f,'.
1.3 'Cl
I "I
I
L I ILI
U
L)
I"I
L
5 ill r h
5
111 0
t
C 1
1
L - 1
71
t
-1
II
Ul
L
ILI (J)
4-
tl
J 4.1
(IJ t j
j r I
1
Ti ILI
if,]
ILI
r. I
- .1
Ul 1
Ill
I
[ij
!if 1
QI i t
Cl LIJ
D
I'l
( I .
rt to
L11
L
ILI
Ili 10
ILI
r1l
ri
r
1
9J
Ilf ILI
!.
Lll LA
1.0 10
ID
j.
Ill ILI
!I
CII
ILI
5 I
L.1 - 1.1
l.
.1
I'l
D
ILI
!,11
1 ul
i
'i (I
I
- -:i Ll
4, 11
d)
itl
-1 1
0 fu
ILI
0
t in
dl !1I
- 1i t I
U)
H ..
I1 Lil
j
..
J.
I LI
I LI
Ill '; ,.
I LI t
ill
11,
17T
lu
- Cl j
1,1)
9
1
til pf
I
rl) 'i
ra ILI
I A
Ili
I j l i
I Ij
r 11 1
fill
1
1 U
Ill I.
Ill 1. 1
if I I I
r -T
1. L 0
17
U I
ILI
I LI
0
ILI+
if)
ILI
ILI
i j
C "1 fl
1 4 i i
Ili I ' I r
L I t 4
71
-1-1
Ii ..I • 1 L .1
I' CI r J
FI
I L J
r 1
rll
r.
La
I j
ft
it
In
4. 1
I I
LL
ITj co
( . 1
, 4
LIJ
CA
LJ
4.
CL
'T
A
(.11
r,II
ri
ITi
I L;
to
r1i
fit
ICI
m l
!"I
IT;
I.'1-
4
Ij
I
I
I
I.fi
71
ITI
17
I F a r-
4 1
T 4. LO
111. I-
U
Cr'
6:4
I C)
al
1.1
Lrl
I ID
jj
co
IT;
ILI
Lr_
Uj
12)
z
I U.1
r
Ri
I I
I IJ
I I.Ij
-.j
FI
:T
01
I
L11
it
ft
nl
U
I7
e. r
S
QJ
Y-1
Ll
1 4
ri
..l. " .J �� � i�'. ...I ;.J i�'d �.��' �� "I A..�i. C�. ���i — } � r_ !'• {^i r.t ; h�k r_ i�y!� -i:_ i...' ?_; -� f� �. L_ _ _ ._ —� t �__ ._ __.
._ _, ._ ._ . _: � ._ ._ _.._.. ._ _..._ � i._. .
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD, FINDING THAT THE PURCHASE OF THREE
SEDANS CAN BE MORE ECONOMICALLY AND EFFICIENTLY
EFFECTED THROUGH THE PRICE NEGOTIATION PROCEDURE.
WHEREAS, Division 3 of the Lynwood Code provides that
purchase of supplies, equipment and services in the amounts of
three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500) or more be contracted
for and let to the lowest responsible bidder after notice, unless
the City Council, by resolution, passed by not less than four -
fifths vote of its members, determines that such an acquisition
may be more economically and efficiently effected through the
use of an alternate procedure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the purchase of
three Sedans can be more economically and efficiently effected
through the price negotiation procedure; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have the Sedans
purchased by the most cost effective procedure.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood
does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows:
SE CTION 1 . The purchase of the Sedans can be more
economically and efficiently effected through the price
negotiation procedure.
SECTION 2. This resolution shall that effect immediately
upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ _ day of
February, 1985.
JOHN D. BYORK, Mayor
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
AND75EA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
City of Lynwood '-C'
APPROVED BY:
zu
JOKEPH Y. WA P.E.
Di ctor of Public Works /City Engineer
City of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
„YNWOOD WARRANT REGISTER - PAGE
0/00/00 THROUGH 2/19/85
6A
VAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
5AFECO TITLF INSURANCE
MONTHLY INVOICE - vOID
100000-
5395 Void
5TATE OF CALIFORNIA
PERS FOR P/E 1/12/85
479999.54
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REPS FOR P/E 1/26/85
47#855.99
5441 - 5444 Prepaid
;1 .5• NATIONAL PARK SERV#
QVERDAYMENT REFUND' ..
]�2AI.72
aAYROLL FUND
OATROLL P/E 2/4/9S
13106286151
5445 - 5500 Spoiled
6CE LUMBER 6 SUPPLY
BUILDING SUPPLIES
377.84
aAN YONG AHN
WATER BILL REFUND
369.36
{�
YANG CHI AHN
WATER PAYMENT REFUND
157.76
4MERICAN INSURANCE SERV.
INDEX SYSTEM
300000
4MERICAN PLANNING ASSN.
PLAN. ADVISORY FEE 1985
255000
dy
AMERICAN SIGNS
PLEX SIGNS
112050
4NSWER PAGE
BEEPER UNITS :JAN 1985
$6.73
4RPOWHEAD DRINKING WATER
MOTTLED WATER'
43.93
!"
%RRUWMEAD PURITAS WATEFS
COFFEE KITS
106000
%T 6 T INFOPMATION SYSTM
SERVICE AGREEMENT
19015
AT -LYN OFFICE SUPPLIFS
MISC. OFFICF SUPPLIES
223.88
+!a
4UTOTRON AUTOMOTIVE
EMISSION TEST
20.00
0 LL INDUSTRIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
756.00
JULIANA L. RATTLE
SPORTS OFFICIAL
12.00
AAT BENEDICT
E•M#T• RE- CERTIF• FE S
19350000
3ENNCTT -BOWEN COMPANY
90OTS••RAIN GEARi Ey
3EST CHAIN MFG CO.
AMAIN i HALF LINKS
362.10
(IRK D. BASIN
REGIS FIRE ACADEMY,
57.00
;LUE DIAMOND MATERIALS
BUILDING SUPPLIES
842.72
anArir) -nALY LfiMPFR CO..
BUILDING SUPPLIES
44.2
?"11
:)ERkY HRFNTS
BLACK HISTORY PROGPAMS
2920u.uU
3EORGE W. SkuSHER# P.E••
PROF SERV /SPEED JUNE STD
4#500.00
:AL- SURANCE ASSOCIATES 1
LOSS CONTROL SERVICE
360.00
"ALIFORNIA FIFE ACADEMY
REGIS* FIRE MANAGEMENT
i 33u•0v
:ALIF FIRE CHIEFS ASSN
'MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION
25004
BETE CAPILLO JP.
SPORTS OFFICIAL
41.00
'ENTER FOP PUBLIC MGT,
COGB ACCOUNTING SEMINAR
560.00
:ENIRAL 6 WFST BASIN
ASSES /QTR ENDING 12/84
439Z26.71
'ENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL
WATER FURNISHED JAN 1985
52966403
'IVIC SUPPLY
FIRE CHIEFS LUG
60.98
'LINICAL LAP OF SAN BERN
WATER SAMPLES JAN 1985
729.00
:OMMUTER BUS LINES
BUS TRANS /UNTV. STUDIOS
150.00
f7j
'ONTINENTAL WESTERN
WATER SOFTNER /8fmAN HALL
1#130.41
'OOKIS OUI(K PRINT
NCR ALARM FORMS
86.00
- OOPER OPUM COMPANY
RECONOITIONFn OR!PMS
226.31
4
)ONALD nOVF
COMMSkS PAY 1
15.00
)OwNEY MOwFF? 6 SAW CO
R/S ENGINE
209081
)UNN- EDWARDS CORPORATION
ALUMINUM 6 PA65
36 *93
+�
?UGEMONT
MASTER FOR COPIER
56.45
NGINE R EOUIPMENT CO.
TUBINGf ADAPTOk
430.21
OARINA ESTRAUA
RECORDING SEPV 2/5/AS
150.00
<`?
rwFEMAN TPi,VFL
AIR TICKETS LAX /OAKLAND
13F.U0
"RY OF'FICF FGnLUCTS
IgPS TYPFWRITEP SERVICF.
1•3UO.UU
:ANA6F FU)jO
FUND TPANI;FFP
1.053.b1
:cNFRAL FUr�r'
FLING TkArasF!
2.2Urv5+1.44
SENE.RAL TELEPHONE CO.
TELEPHONE SF1 -VICES
269.U4
:HARLES GOMF7
EMPL. RELATIONS CONY.
105.00
°
,JAMES F. GOr)TALEZ
WATER SILL REFUNG
5.00
%LICE W. GPANT
WATER PILL PFFUNO
57.15
THE GR0 HOOK
THE GRANTMANSHIP GOOK
56.[0
rl
.YNWOOD WARRANT REGISTER
PAGE 2 ;
0 /00 /00
THROUGH 2 /19/85
4AM
UESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
�7
4 8 J WELDING
WELDING ON FILTER ORIDS
1;5.00
4AJOCA CORPORATION
BUILDING SUPPLIES
51.47'
±AMMER SECUPITY SERVICE
SECURITY SERV 1/16/85
20$430
MASCO OIL COMPANY# INC.
GAS# FLAMMABLE LIQUID
29206.12
40A FUND
FUND TRANSFER
b9281.13
/?
[NT #L CITY MGMT ASSN.
1985 MUNICIPAL YEARBOOK
78.75
[NTERSOFT SYSTEMS
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
681.00
JUDICIAL DATA SERVICES
PARKING ACTIVITY JAN 85
29663.55
.UCILLE KANKA
COMMSRS PAY 2/13/85
15.00
CEYSTONE FORD
ROTOR 4 =s w {w ...:, -: .71; S4
IIRST PUMP 6 MACHINE
80R 6 M C: PAAtS y >;�
LABOR
. `8i+
AMR ASSOCIATES
BUS LICENSE REFUND
j0.09
(NOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
FLASHLIGHTS /RATTERTES
65.75
AMHERT TRA�14 "4IS51CNS
TRAMSMISSION OVERHAUL
361.83
JAMAL LAMPKIN
SPORTS OFFICIAL
12100
.DS CHURCH
OVEPOILLINO REFUND
40#7995
.A CNTY MUNICIPAL COURT
PARKINS CITATION SURCHGS
19245
'OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
DECEMBER MACS 6 POSTA3E
._'i,;, . 1T.SO
;OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ""
-
PERSONNEL SERVICES QTR
; -.:' `` 320.141
;OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
LAW ENFORCs ADJUSTMENT
3109893.71
Q
..OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
MAINTENANCE NOVEMHER 85
370.81
YNGATE PRINTING CO
BUS. CARDS/ D.J. FRASER
45980
_YNWOOD CHAIFHER OF COMRS
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
200000
.YNWOOD PRESS
PUB HEARING NOTICE AS002
ItOU•SO
.YNWOOD SPECIALTY SHOPS
REPAIR VACUUM - CLEANER
41.7$
,ITY OF LYNW60D
REPLENISH WORKERS 'COMP
2 +346.418
44
A 6 M TRUCK PARTS# INC
TRUCK PARTS
979 #46
16 M TRUCK OARTS9 INC "°
TRUCK PARTS
351.51
I.J. MAYER LAW OFFICE
PROF SERVICES JAN 1985
3940000
1)
IG INDUSTRIES
COMP AIR CYLINDER
83.37
tEV. JAMES MIMS AND
WATER OVERPAYMENT REFUND
85.00
IONAD #S
KROY CARTRIDGES
261.75
40NARCH BROOM 6 WIRE
MOBIL DRAG SHOE RUBBERS
775032
IONROE DIVISION brr..
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
tENE L. MORIN "
`6tATER OVERPAYMENT REPUNb
IR QUICK PRINTING
FIELD REPORT FORMS
30.72
4ATIONAL RECREATION AND
RECREATION BOOKS
14920
1FPPY MACK N,dULLS II
SPORTS OFFICIAL
36.00
r�
JIXUN -EGLI EDUIPMENT
AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
105.30
)ORTON CHEMPLAST
GkAFOIL RIBBON9RINGS
219.22
>ACIFIC BtLL
TELEPHONE SERVICES
19961.38
1ACIFIC FEDEGAL
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
16.24
:SPERANZA PEPEZ
DEPOSIT REFUND
15000
OETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT
359912
>RFSTON WFED CONTROL CO.
ROUND -UP HERBICIDE
830.70
IPUDENTIAL OVERALL SI)PL.
UNIFORM SERVICE
268.66
OROOENTIAL OVFPALL SUPL.
UNIFORM SERVICE
152.13
1
TOY PRYOR
COMMSRS PAY 1/12/85
15.00
tUICK COURIEP SERVICE
.COURIER SERVICE
244.80
1UICK COURIER SERVICE
COURIER SERVICE
22.00
0
UGENE RAYMOND
CUMMSRS PAY 2/12/85
15.00
;.A. RENTERIA AUTO PARTS
HOSE
357.08
;.A. RENTERIA AUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS
22.24
0
•HELMA RICE
LIAR. CLAIM SETTLEmFNT
56.uo
rlR(;IvIA RQPu Ayt s
Cf) +m SRS PAY 2/11
1S.vu
;AFFTY- KLEFf CORPORATION
MACHINF SFRVTCE
45.uu
A
0
LYNWOOD WARRANT REGISTER PAGE 3
0 /00 /00 THROUGH 2/19/85
NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
LEE SAMPSON COMMSRS TRAY 2/12/85 15.00
SAN DIEGO FIRE EQUIP.CO. UNIFOPM JACKET 754.42
IRAN SAWYER SPORTS OFFICIAL 20.00
SELF INSURANCZ FUND WORKERS COMP JAN 1985 9#443.54
SHIRLEY'S PHOTOGAPHY CITY COUNCIL PICTURES 218.53
STEPHANIE SIDDELL SPORTS, OFFICIAL 25009
PATRICIA SIMPSO�V DEPOSI REFUND " 900,00
SMART 6 FINAL IRIS CO. MISC SUPPLIES 18073
SO CALIF EDISON COMPANY ELECTRICITY SERVICE 10#962.44
SO CALIF GA$ COMPANY GAS SERVICE 3 9310.90
SOUTH GATE V ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 91089
SPARKLETTS COOLER RENTAL & WATER 36.75
ST. FRANCIS ,MEDICAL CTRr PRE EMPLOY PHY /W. MOPIAN 70#00
STODDARD COMPANY FLANOES _ 83125
BARBARA THOMAS OVERPAYMENT REFUN:J 26918
TIMELY TEMPORARY SERVIft,- TEMP ,5fQVtCg* -Vr tURRIE"
TOMARK SPORTS ' CABLES FOR TEANIA NET Ib5.30 '
TRANSAMEPICAN FINANCE MATER OVERPAYMENT REFUND 40600
TRANSPORTATION FUND FUND TRANSFER 4#117.36
BILL TURNER REALTY WATER OVERPAYMENT REFUND 12.44
U.S. POSTMASTER 4COLENISM POSTAOE METER _ 7t000+00
UNITED PAW IC CORP s r T -4.0iff NAI+i �.1$F'
UNIVERSAL S ±Mf:O TQJ " #OCIIr:ri Qar
0,
NELSON WASHI.N�ToN 1YR !I'. DFPtiAt `
WATCH TOWER' 3, WA1'CR OVERPAYh6Kt ARPUND ' X 11.80
PAM WEATHERS DEPOSIT REFUND 10000
WEST PURLISHING CO. 1985 PAMPHLETS 55.39
WESTERN WASTE INDUSTRIES RUBBISH COLL* 3/85 29930.40
WHEEL MAN TIRE SERV JI"r SERVICE 88.00
I(EROX CORPOP'ATION 6IBG U.It1F P'AN JAN 8S *h`' fil;:# 7 3 _ =,
fftNO PEOPLd OF t.ftMM
TOTAL
i
------------------------
I
I
f�
6?
Q
4
0
4 J
FUND NUMRER I GENERAL FUND
FUND NUMRER 2 WATER FUND
FUND NUMRER 3 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
FUNn N Imp EF' 4 LIGF'TINC, MAINTENANCE FUND
FUND NU�+E.i R C•AkAGE FUND
FUND NUMBER 9 PFTIF FUND
FU NUMPEN 12 RLVFNUE SHARING FUND
FUND NUKE ;ER ?3 SELF INSURANCE FUND
FUND NUMHE.R 27 H.C.n•A. FUND
FU ND NUMRER :11 TRANSPORTATION FUND
FUND NUMBER 32 PROP "All LOCAL RETURN FUND
FUND NUMRER 33 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FUND
FUND NIIMQE.R 44 U.P.A.P.P. FUND
ALL FUNDS
1OT rY FUN)
5139172.bT
2203#900.76
31 #828.28
19677.07
129332.92
299085.01
1119591.24
3#725.38
179525.16
49107.38
49117.38
159521.08
39281.72
9519867.03
F
h:.
4
i
ti
J
�r
i
l
7 #.
t r k
iYl
J
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AMENDING SECTION 19 -64 OF THE LYNWOOD CITY
CODE RELATING TO PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
The City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby ordain
as follows:
SECTION_1_ Section 19 -64 of the Lynwood City Code hereby is amended
to read as follows:
Sec. 19 -64. Increase in state law maximum speed on certain
designated streets.
It is hereby determined upon the basis of a traffic and engineering
survey that the maximum speed permitted by State law in = ertain
business and residential districts in the City shall be changed to a
speed limit declared to be reasonable and safe and which will be
conducive to the orderly movement of vehicular traffic under the
conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is hereby
declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as herein set
forth on those streets herein designated when signs are erected
giving notice thereof;
1. Abbott Road, Century Boulevard to
Atlantic Avenue ----------------------- - - -
Tc
_�
-
miles
per hour.
�.
Alameda Street (west roadway),
103rd Street to southerly city limit ......
40
miles
per hour.
3.
Atlantic Avenue, northerly city limit to
Fernwood Avenue ---- ------------- - - -
- 40
miles
per hour.
4.
Atlantic Avenue, Fernwood Avenue to
southerly city limit ___________ ____ ___ _ _
_4th
miles
per hour.
5.
Bullis Road, Imperial Highway to
southerly city limit ----------- ------ - - -
-- ;.5
miles
per hour.
6.
California Avenue, Century Boulevard to
Imperial Highway ------ -------------- - - -
- LS
miles
per hour.
7.
California Avenue, Imperial Highway to
Fernwood Avenue ...........................
miles
per hour.
e.
Carlin Avenue, Bullis Road to
Olanda Street ______________ _ _ _ _ __
35
miles
per hour.
9.
Century Boulevard, Alameda Street to
California Ave--- ---- ---- ---------- - - - - --
40
miles
per hour.
10.
Century Boulevard, California Avenue to
Q.. 1 4 — o., -.a
r�
,
13. Fernwood Avenue, Alameda Street to
Wright Road ------------- - - - --- 15 miles per hour.
14. Imperial Highway, Mona Boulevard to
Fernwood Avenue ------ ------ --- - -- 40 miles per hour.
15. Imperial Highway, Fernwood Avenue to
State Street ............................ _ 40 miles per hour.
16. Imperial Highway, State Street to
Century Boulevard____ ....................... 15 miles per hour.
17. Imperial Highway, Century Boulevard t.=;
Eanwell Street _ _______ ___________ _ _ _ _ __ 40 ,Tides per hour.
18. Imperial Highway, Benwell Street to
29. Wright Road, Duncan Avenue to
Century boulevard ....................... =5 miles per hour.
30. Writht Road, Century Boulevard to
Fernwood Avenue _ 35 miles per hour.
------------------ - - - - --
SECTION 2. Severability_ If any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, or the
application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to
other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it
wni_►1 H haw= adnntnd thin nrHi nanrP_ and xarh sxrt i nn _ K ihnart i nn _
easterly city limit .....................
40
miles
per
hour.
19-
Long beach Boulevard, Tweedy Boulevard to
southerly city limit __ ______________
25
miles
per
hour.
20.
Lynwood Road, Alameda Street to
Long Beach Boulevard _______ ____________
UO
miles
per
hour.
21.
Lynwood Road, Long Beach Boulevard to
Bullis Road _ _______________ _ _ _ _ __
25
miles
per
hour.
22.
Norton Avenue, Alameda Street to
State Street --------- --- - --
25
miles
per
hour.
23.
Norton Avenue, State Street to
Century Boulevard ........................
O
miles
per
hour.
24.
Norton Avenue, Century Boulevard to
Imperial Highway --- ------ -- _
35
miles
per
hour.
25.
Santa Fe Avenue, Century Boulevard to
Norton Avenue____________ ________ _______
55
miles
per
hour.
26.
Santa Fe Avenue, Norton Avenue to
Fernwood Avenue________ ________ _________
30
miles
per
hour
27.
State Street, Tweedy Boulevard to
Cedar Avenue
5
miles
per
hour.
28.
State Street /Santa Fe Avenue, Cedar Avenue
to southerly city limit _____
40
miles
per
hour.
29. Wright Road, Duncan Avenue to
Century boulevard ....................... =5 miles per hour.
30. Writht Road, Century Boulevard to
Fernwood Avenue _ 35 miles per hour.
------------------ - - - - --
SECTION 2. Severability_ If any section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, or the
application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to
other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it
wni_►1 H haw= adnntnd thin nrHi nanrP_ and xarh sxrt i nn _ K ihnart i nn _
SECTION___ The City Clerk is hereby ordered anc directed to certify
to the passage of this Ordinance and to causa to a same to be
published once in the Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City of
Lynwood.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City held on the - - - - -- - day of ------ - - - - - , liaf, and finally
ordered published at a regular meeting of said Council held on the
the - - - - -- - day of ....
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
--------------------------------
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
City of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
----------------------------------
City Attorney
- - - - - -- 5 1985.
--------------------------
JOHN D. BYORK, Mayor
City Q-r Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
-- -------------------------
JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/
CITY ENGINEER
> CITY OF LYNWOOD
`� 11330 DULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
OFFICE OF THE
CITY CLERK
INTER- OFFICE MEMO
DATE: February 19, 1985
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT - HCDA BOARD
At the Regular Council meeting of February 5, 1985
Councilman Henning nominated Barbara A. Fitts for the one (1)
vacancy on the HCDA Board.
It was moved, seconded to close nominations.
Appointment: February 19, 1985
(a CITY OF LYNWOOD
y[_ L• aT
�l 11330 BULLIS ROAD
T LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
OFFICE OF THE
CITY CLERK
- INTER-OFFICE MEMO
DATE: February 19 1985
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk,-A
SUBJECT: ANNOUNCEMENT: ONE (1) VACANCY HCDA BOARD
Word has been received in the City Clerk's office
that Alfred Walker, member of the HCDA Board has
resigned.
Nominations: First meeting in March, 1985
Appointment: Second meeting in March, 1985
1
U11Y U1' Lf1
t, 11330 SULLIS ROAD
1 �r
t � - LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213) 537 -0600
NOTICE OF INTENTION FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATION
BY
ST, EMYDIUS CATHOLIC CHURCH
ANNUAL 1K PARISH FESTIVAL
SPECIAL EVENT C IN THE CITY OF TYNW00n, CA
ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE
10900 California Ave. Lynwood, 90262 637 -7095
DATE ORGANIZED INCORPORATED TAX EXEMPT PREVIOUS LICENSE NUMBER
MAY 3rd, 4 th and 5th 1985
PROCEEDS TO BE Ar ^PLIED TO WHAT PURPOSE /USE?
St. Emy dius School
TYPE OF APPEAL TYPE OF DONATIONS DATE(S) OF SOLICITATION TERM OF REQUESTED LICENSE /PERMI
RESIDENTIAL
CONIMERCE /INDUSTRY FROM TO FROM 5/3/85 TO 5/5/85
GOALS SOLICITATION WILL BE MADE BY INDICATE COMPENSATION, SALARIES,
LOCAL
X PAID SOLICITORS _ TVIRADIO _ BOX OFFICE _ COMMISSIONS ETC. PAID TO STATE DETAILS Of
_
STATE __ VOLUNTEERS _- MAIL _ OTHER CONDUCTORS _ MANAGERS_ REVERSE SIDE
NATIONAL —_ NEWSPAPER —SALE PROMOTORS _ SOLICITORS_NONE
> NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO BE BENEFITED ADDRESS TELEPHONE
> St. Emydius Scholl 10990 California Ave. Lynwood, CA 635 -7184 `
C
DAT 3A5A
DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IT DOES
Grammar School for 1st to 8th grades
ADMISSION TO EVENT BY-
TICKET INVITATIO DONATION
PROJECTED EXPE1401TURES FOR THIS SOLICITATION:
PRIZES 6., 5 nn _ on
PUBLICITY
LABOR __ - n -
TELEPHONE
FOOD — 6- 000 . 00
STATIONERY
FAVORS —_ -n-
ADVERTISING
MUSIC __ -n-
FOOD RESOLD
POSTAGE — -n-
DECORATIONS
PRINTING —_ 3un,
nn ENTERTAINERS
COSTUMES __ -n-
RENTAL- BUILDING
UNIFORMS _ -n-
PERMITS- LICENSE
LOCATION OF ACTIVITY
NUMBER PRINTED
A• a•
1/ 1/
11 1/
/
1 /1
1
1
OFFICERS NAME AND TITLE (TWO REQUIRED) ADDRESS
Print name & title _ Rev Donal O'Connor, Pastor 10900 California Ave.
Signature � ^� �� < 7�'-✓ �''jT � �-
Print name & title Arthur Fitzpglrick, Chairman
Signature
PERSON IN CHARG: OF APPEAL ✓
Print name _
Signature
TOTAL
Lynwood, CA 90262
TELEPHONE
637 -7095
14527 Tacuba Dr. 1 941 -9403
La Mirada, CA 90638
ADDRESS I TELEPHONE
NSTRUCTIONS Complete iry detail. Write "None /Not applicable" if appropriate. President and Secretary signatures are preferred. Attach name; address o
of directors of The organization. List all contributions and their use or expenditure for calendar year immediately preceding this solicitation or provide annua
audit. For special event solicitation for another organization, attach authorization therefrom.
NUMBERED
TRANSPORTATION
RENTAL - EQUIPMENT
PURCHASE - EQUIPMENT
RESERVATION CHARGES
(PER PLATE COSTS)
MERCHANDISE SOLD
OTHER EXPENSE:
TAX EXEMPT NU.
PRICE WITH TAX
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
24.030.00
, e. -