The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutA1991-12-03 CCJ AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION �V _t.� AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL 01 1Y7A1� TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 3, 1991 I "I' ICE IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ; 7:30 P.M. �, f,,11t)I��hlltiPlll%I'tl1 LOUIS J. HEINE MAYOR ROBERT HENNING PAUL H. RICHARDS II COUNCILPERSON COUNCILPERSON ARMANDO REA EVELYN WELLS COUNCILPERSON COUNCILPERSON CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. HERIOT HENRY BARBOSA CITY TREASURER CITY CLERK MARY L. WRIGHT ANDREA L. HOOPER .1. - - - L pit of LYNWOOD ttg Aeettog Naffenges I M g 11330 BULLIS ROAD !' LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90282 (213)803.0220 IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS, WE ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING OR BEFORE 7:45 P.M. FAILURE TO FILL OUT SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL. OPENING CEREMONIES 1. CALL TO ORDER , 2. INVOCATION - Pastor Fell, Seventh Day Adventist Church 3. PRESENTATION OF COLORS 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS Robert Henning Armando Rea Paul H. Richards II Evelyn Wells Louis J. Heine 6. CERTIFICATION OF AGENDA POSTING BY THE CITY CLERK 0 4 II r r CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1991 7. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: a. Regular Meeting November 19, 1991 1 I 16 8. CERTIFICATION OF CITY OF LYNWOOD GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION 9. SWEARING IN CEREMONIES a. Mayor swears in City Clerk -elect b. City Clerk swears in Councilpersons -elect and Treasurer - elect 10. COMMENDATIONS a. Robert Henning b. Mary Wright 11. REORGANIZATION OF COUNCIL a. Nominations for Mayor Pro -Tem 12. APPOINTMENT OF DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES TO MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMITTEES 13. COUNCIL RECESS TO: LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LYNWOOD INFORMATION INC. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Regarding Agenda Items Only) SCHEDULED MATTERS CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE i All matters listed under the Consent Calendar wi111 be acted upon by one Motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to voting unless members of the Council or staff request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 14. THREE WAY STOP SIGN INSTALLATION AT STATE STREET AND JOSEPHINE STREET Comments: To recommend that City Council approve the installation of a three -way stop sign at State Street and Josephine Street. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the installation of a three -way stop sign at State Street and Josephine Street. A i CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1991 15. GRANT OF UTILITY EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR CITY HALL - 11330 BULLIS ROAD Comments: Underground District No. 8 requires that Southern California Edison Company underground their facilities along Bullis Road. In order to continue providing electricity to City Hall, Southern California Edison needs an easement from the City to maintain their facilities. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution granting a utility easement to Southern California Edison Company. 16. SELECTION OF DIAL -A -RIDE VANS Comments: The budget for FY 1991 -92 calls for the purchase of two (2) Dial -A -Ride vans to replace unit 500, 1982 Ford van and unit 501, 1982 Ford van. Staff recommends that these vehicles be replaced with the same type vehicles, since they have proven to be reliable and long lasting. Information on additional vehicles will be provided for Council's review and selection. Recommendation: That the City Council review the different Dial -A -Ride type vehicles available and approve staff's recommendation. 17. SNORKEL (FIRE ENGINE 311) REFURBISHMENT AND ENGINE DIAGNOSTIC MACHINE PURCHASE Comments: The refurbishing of the fire snorkel and the �urchase of the engine diagnostic machine are funded by the ICLFA loan. In order to meet the loan spending schedule, the purchases had to be done in an emergency manner. According to the City of Lynwood Municipal Code, Section 6 -3.13, these emergency purchases are allowed by a 4/5 vote of the City Council. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing staff to refurbish the fire snorkel and to purchase the engine diagnostic machine thru an informal bid. 18. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22905 CASE NO. TPM 22 Comments: The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into two (2) parcels, at 3045 and 3047 Redwood Avenue in the R -1 (Single- Family Residential) zone. Recommendation: That the City Council remove the conditions as requested by the appealant pertaining to Tentative Parcel Map no. 22. 3 0 i CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1991 19. BROWN VS POWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT Comments: The City of Lynwood and all other members of the ICRMA Governing Board met and agreed to prepare letters supporting Poway School District's petition for review of the above - referenced suit. City of Lynwood's letter is presented to Council for aproval. Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign A LETTER to the California Supreme Court supporting the Poway Unified School District's position for Review in the above - referenced suit. 20. ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES - AWARD OF CONTRACT Comments: In the August 20, 1991 City Council Meeting, Council directed staff to pursue a contract with the Los Angeles County department of Animal control to provide animal control services and administer the animal licensing program. SEAACA has lowered its cost from $196,546 to $163,328 for the FY 91 -92 and the County has submitted a contract for Council review. By replacing SEAACA by FY 92 -93 the City can potentially save about $123,000 over a period of three (3) years. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution replacing SEAACA and the in -house dog licensing program with Los Angeles County Department of Animal control provided services effective July 1, 1992. 21. AB 939 - RESOLUTION URGING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO AMEND AB 939 Comments: AB 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act imposes responsibilities on local governments to develop and implement integrated waste management programs. The Act in its current form sets forth various requirements that are cumbersome and costly for the City to implement. Staff would like to present to Council a list of recommendations to simplify the Act. Recommendation: Staff recommends to have City Council adopt a Resolution urging the State of California to simplify the implementation of AB 939. 22. WARRANT REGISTER DATED DECEMBER 3, 1991 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Warrant Register. 4 G t CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1991 DISCUSSION ITEMS 23. NOMINATIONS: COMMUNITY AFFAIRS COMMISSION - David W. Litsinger - A. Ann Fields - Lucille Walker - Yolanda Bays 24. SPECIAL PERMITS a. Christmas Tree Lot - Charles E. Davis 25. CHARITABLE SOLICITATION a. United Children's Fund b. Purple Heart Veterans Rehabilitation Services, Inc. C. Teen Challenge of Southern California 26. REQUEST BY CHARLES DREW UNIVERSITY FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM CITY'S RENTAL INCREASE. Comments: The Head Start School has submitted a written request for the wavier of the recently- approved increase in the rental rates by the City Council. Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the Council upon review of the foregoing facts, issue a directive with respect to the above request. 27. EMPLOYEES HOLIDAY TIME OFF Comments: 1 To request Council's approval on .allowing holiday time off for employees. Recommendation: Council provide staff with their wishes for this year or grant approval of the above. CLOSED SESSION City Council consider adjourning to a closed session pursuant to the following Government Code to discuss: 28. a. Section 54956.9 - Pending Litigation b. Section 54956.9b - Potential Litigation C. Section 54957 - Personnel Matters d. Section 54957.6 - Employee Salaries /Benefits 5 A CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1991 COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 29. MAYOR LOUIS J. HEINE 30. COUNCILMAN ROBERT HENNING 31. COUNCILMAN ARMANDO REA 32. COUNCILMAN PAUL H. RICHARDS II 33. COUNCILWOMAN EVELYN WELLS ADJOURNMENT MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING FOR DECEMBER 17, 1991 AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. [l REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1991 The City Council of the City of Lynwood met in a regular session in the City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road on the above date at 7:30p.m. Mayor Heine in the chair. Councilmembers Rea, Richards, Wells, Heine, answered the roll call. Councilmember Henning was absent. Also present was City Manager Heriot, City Attorney Barbosa, and City Clerk Hooper. City Clerk announced the agenda had been duly posted in accordance with The Brown Act. It was moved by Councilmember Rea, seconded by Councilmember Wells and carried, to approve minutes of Regular meeting, November 5, 1991. Commendation for Nephi Tapusoa was approved by General Consent. It was moved by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Rea and carried, to recess to Lynwood Redevelopment Agency at 7:34p.m. Council was reconvened at 9:32p.m. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS- AGENDA ITEMS ONL' Hahn Reed, 12126 Cornish, spoke in oppositi for "Impact Alternative Learning Center ". participating students would come from, how who would teach them, and what the teaching the student - teacher ratio, the curriculum. 1 LL 3n to item 17- Proposal Questioned where the they would be chosen, credentials would be, Also questioned the 1GXNDA ITEM f I 0 0 length of time involved in implementing the program, the length of time for the students to enter and exit the program. Also questioned there being adequate classrooms and the appropriate sizes, how they measure up to the earthquake and fire standards as required. Questioned when the city went into the business of lending tax - payers money to individual businesses and without any evidence of ability to pay. How could taxpayer money be loaned out at zero percent interest rate. Questioned if this program was related in any way to the Genesys program. Urged Council to vote no on the request and the resolution. Joe Battle, 4304 Carlin, spoke on item 17- Proposal for "Impact Alternative Learning Center" and spoke on the School District's goals listing everything required in order to reach President Bush's educational goal for 2000. Also spoke on State of California law regarding Educational Contracts, Section 8092 which speaks to post - secondary schools having to be approved by the Department of Education before application for any funds can be submitted. Stated there were three private schools in Lynwood who would like to be eligible for funds, but they were not, as they are not post secondary schools. Spoke of the School District needing funds for a number of similar programs that had to be eliminated due to budget cuts. Stated there were students who were now being educated in Los Angeles County that could be brought back into the Lynwood School District. Stated if the city had that type of funds, the School District would appreciate having the use of it. Lee Sampson, 12106 Second Avenue, spoke on item 17- Proposal for "Impact Alternative Learning Center" and stated he was opposed to the project. Feels the city should look to the School District for programs of this sort. Stated there appears to a lot of duplication of services in the programs that are being offered by the Sheriff's Department and other organizations. More research needs to be done before these programs are presented. Margaret Araujo, 3621 Cedar Avenue, spoke on item 17- Proposal for "Impact Alternative Learning Center" and discussed the funding that had already been given to Project Impact. 2 • • Rev. Harris, Project Impact, spoke on item 17- Proposal for "Impact Alternative Learning Center ". Discussed the overall program and did not understand how someone could form an opinion on the programs under Project Impact without first coming to the facility and seeing what is actually being done. Councilmember Richards discussed the citizens of the community and the need to come together and work things out regardless of race, color, or creed. After further discussion, It was moved by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Wells to continue the matter so that staff could bring back more information on the matter. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: COUNCIIJCMER REA ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HENNING SCHEDULED MATTERS: Mayor Heine announced the time had arrived to conduct a public hearing on Preliminary Draft on the City's Solid Waste Reduction and Reduction It was moved by Councilmember Wells, seconded by Councilmember Rea and carried, to open the public hearing. City Manager Heriot stated staff and Consultants had a brief presentation to make on this item. Kathy Windsor, Emcon Associates, discussed mandates for cities to achieve a 25% reduction in solid waste disposed by 1995 and a 50% reduction by year 2000. Discussed cities also having to prepare, adopt, and submit to their respective County an SRRE and HHWE. Also discussed the results of waste disposal study that was done. Al Rausch, 3935 LeSage, questioned what the costs that were stated are to be used for. Also spoke on whether or not this was to be for one year or longer. Mayor Heine stated there would me more workshops before the final draft was put together. 3 Hearing no further response, It was moved by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Wells to continue public hearing for a discussion of the Final Draft. ROLL CALL: AYES: . COUNCILMEMBERS REA, RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HENNING CONSENT CALENDAR: All matters listed under the Consent Calendar were acted upon by one Motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda unless members of Council or staff requested specific items removed for separate action. Councilmember Rea requested item 14- Notice of intent to conduct a public hearing to ascertain whether a nuisance is being maintained at 11410 California Avenue in the City of Lynwood; and item 16- Warrant run dated November 19, 1991. The following action was taken: RESOLUTION NO. 91 -172 ENTITLED: ^A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD GRANTING A UTILITY EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY OF A STRIP OF LAND 14 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING WITHIN TRACT NO. 2 - OF PARTITION OF A PORTION THE HOME TRACT OF ANTONIO MARIA LUGO AND MARIA GERMAN LUGO BEING A PORTION OF RANCHO SAN ANTONIO, PER DISTRICT COURT CASE 3590, COURT FILE 116, AND BEING A PORTION OF OSCAR TOWER 40.37 ACRE ALLOTMENT." WAS PRESENTED. It was moved by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Wells to adopt the resolutions. ROLL CALL: AYES. COUNCILMEMBERS REA, RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Councilmember Rea requested item 14- Notice of intent to conduct a public hearing to ascertain whether a nuisance is being maintained at 11410 California Avenue in the City of Lynwood and questioned if Council was duplicating it's efforts to get the proponent to come into compliance and questioned what actions would transpire if the property was deemed to be a public nuisance. Stated the citizens living on surrounding streets are tired of the blight in the area and want action now. 4 n City Attorney Barbosa spoke on followed and tonight's action for the Council to determine method of abatement. 1 0 City Code procedures that must be simply sets the matter for hearing whether a nuisance exists and the Community Development Director Karefa- Johnson stated the difference in the two resolutions was that now the city was going for demolition of the site. Engineers had determined that the structure is unsound. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -173 ENTITLED: °A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO ASCERTAIN WHETHER A NUISANCE IS BEING MAINTAINED ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY." WAS PRESENTED. It was moved by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Rea to adopt the resolution. ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMENBERS REA, RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HENNING Councilmember Rea requested item 16- Warrant run dated November 19, 1991, and stated he approved the warrant run with the exception of warrant number 35557 in the amount of $2,740.51 payable to Star Photo Unlimited. City Manager Heriot stated the bill was for services already rendered to the city. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -175 ENTITLED: °A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE DEMANDS AND ORDERING WARRANTS DRAWN THEREFOR." WAS PRESENTED. It was moved by Councilmember Rea to approve the warrant run with the exception of warrant number 35557. No second to the motion. It was moved by Councilmember Wells, seconded by Councilmember Richards to approve the warrant run. AYES: COUNCILMEMBER REA APPROVED THE WARRANT RUN WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WARRANT NUMBER 35557 AYES: COUNCILMEMBER RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HENNING 5 r I It was moved by Councilmember Wells, seconded by Councilmember Richards to approve CIP /Financial Workshop on December 21, 1991 from 9:00a.m. until completion of workshop. Councilmember Rea stated this date was so close to Christmas and there was no rapid excelleration on CIP inquiries and doesn't see where the financial situation will change between now and January. Stated the newly elected Councilperson and the City Treasurer should be given the opportunity to take a look at all departments organizational charts. Would like to see matter held over until the second or third week in January. Councilmember Richards stated it was important to review the matter of CIP projects as soon as possible. Suggested maybe the 10th day of December would be better. Councilmember Wells stated the new Councilperson would be seated by December 3; 1991, and the workshop would be a good training tool for him. Feels the workshop should be held as soon as possible. After further discussion, ROLL CALL: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS REA, RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HENNING It was moved by Councilmember wells, seconded by Councilmember Richards to approve Special Permits for the following: a. Christmas Tree Lot - Robert Starkey b. Christmas Tree Lot - Teen Challenge C. One Day Flea Market - Lynwood Adventist Academy Councilmember Wells stated she was requesting item D -Curb Numbering Contract - Francisco Sanchez, pulled as the Anti - Graffiti Crew to do the curb painting. City Manager stated the item would be pulled and brought back for clarification. ROLL CALL.- AYES: COUNCILMEMBER REA APPROVED ALL ITEMS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM A- CHRISTMAS TREE LOT - ROBERT STARKEY AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS RICHARDS, WELLS, HEINE NOES: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILME4BER HENNING M • • City Attorney Barbosa stated each Councilmember would have to vote in favor of hearing item Carnival for M & D Properties. City Manager Heriot stated this item did not appear to be an emergency and they have repeatedly submitted items late. Mayor Heine stated a letter needed to be sent to M & D Properties informing them any late items would not be accepted. Councilmember Richards stated he would be willing to hear the item at a special meeting. After discussion, It was agreed by General Consent, to set a special meeting for Thursday, November 21, 1991, at 6:OOp.m. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Cynthia G. Geter, 3850 Virginia, spoke on Project Impact program and discussed .the program being beneficial to the young people in the city. Feels the program deserves more credibility. Al Rausch, 3935 LeSage, spoke on the purchase of vehicles by the city and the amount of money being spent. Joe Battle, 3304 Carlin Avenue, spoke on citizens who attempt to mix God and State and then attempt to get rich off City Government. Complimented-Council on their efforts in doing city business. William Cunningham, 10821 Cornish, spoke on Code Enforcement and the excellent job being done. COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS- Councilmember Rea spoke on proposal for Impact Alternative Learning Center and stated he was in approval of the program. Stated if Community Development continues to bring automotive facilities and rehab centers to the city, then the city is headed in the wrong direction. Spoke on the CIP Workshop and the feasibility of having a motorcycle /traffic enforcement program. Councilmember Wells spoke on proposal for Project Impact and the program being a good one. Stated the VISTA Program is not working for the young people. Also spoke on the comments made regarding Rev. Harris not living in Lynwood, but the Superintendant of Schools does not live in the city and doesn't feel this makes any difference. Feels Rev. Harris can do a good job. Hopes citizens would listen to the truth. Spoke of concerns Council had regarding threatening phone calls that had been received attempting to scare Council into making decisions, and attempted recall. Hopes School District will sit down with Rev. Harris and discuss the program. Councilmember Richards spoke on issues that had come up in the past and Council having done a good job managing the resources as they now stand. Stated the city has good leadership and this is the reason for the many good things that are going on in the city. Spoke on City and School District working together for the betterment of the city. Mayor Heine stated item Impact Alternative Learning Center would be coming back on another agenda. Stated as Mayor, he would spend as much time as possible to accomplish good things for the city. Spoke of cooperation from all Councilmembers and citizens in helping to change the image of Lynwood as portrayed in the press. There was no further business and it was moved and seconded to adjourn. MAYOR APPROVED CITY CLERK E, RESOLUTION No. RESOUMON OF 1 Cny COUNCIL OF 1 M OF ••1 CALIFORNIA, RECITIM THE OF 1 THE GENERAL M ELECTION • E/ IN 11 CITY ON • D 1. 71• / DC 1 17 RESULT • 171' 7• 11 SUCH • OTHER MATTERS PROVIDED BY LAW. WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Lynwood, California, on Tuesday, November 5, 1991, as required by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 87 -99 adopted June 16, 1987, the election was consolidated with the General Municipal Election and the Registrar canvassed the returns of said election and has certified the results to this City Council, said results are received, attached and made a part hereof as "Exhibit A'; and WHEREAS, notice of said election was duly and regularly given in time, form and manner as provided by law; and that in all respects said election was held and conducted and the votes cast thereat, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Election Code of the State of California. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby resolve, declare determine and order as follows: SECTION 1, That there were 11 voting precincts established for the purpose of holding said election consisting of the regular election precincts in said City as established for the holding of state and county elections. SECTION 2. That said General Municipal Election was held for the purpose of electing the following officers of said City as required by laws relating to cities in the State of California; to wit: Two (2) Members of the City Council of said City for a one (1) term of four (4) years; • City Clerk of said City for a one (1) term of four (4) years; • City Treasurer of said City for a one (1) term of four (4) years. SECTION 3. That the whole number of votes cast in said City was 2,662. That the names of persons voted for at said election for Members of the City Council are as follows: Margaret Araujo Lois Byrd Louis J. Heine Robert Henning That the names of the persons voted for at said election for City Clerk are as follows: Ana Ventura Andrea L. Hooper That the names of the persons voted for at said election for City Treasurer are as follows: Iris Pygatt Isadore Hall, III David James Willis, Jr. jam► ITSN SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that: Louis Byrd was elected as Member of the City Council of said City for the full terns of four years; Louis J. Heine was elected Member of the City Council of said City for the full term of four years; Andrea L Hooper was elected City Clerk of said City for the full term of four years; Iris Pygatt was elected City Treasurer of said City for the full term of four years. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of said City, a statement of the results of said election showing: (1) The whole number of votes cast in the city; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) For what office each person was voted for. SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of such persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and duly authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected, the Oath of Office prescribed in the State Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe thereto and file the same in the office of the City Clerk. Whereupon, each and all of said persons so elected shall be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. MAYOR, City of Lynwood ATTEST: CITY CLERK, City of Lynwood 0 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LAS ANGELES ss. I, Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, County of Los Angeles, State of California, duly authorized by Resolution No. 87 -99, adopted by the City Council of said City on the 16th day of June, 1987, do hereby certify that the Registrar of Voters has canvassed the return of the regular General Municipal Election held in said City on the 5th day of November, 1991, and find that the number of votes given in the City of Lynwood persons voted for the respective offices for which said persons were cnadidates as shown on Resolution and Exhibit A, is true and correct. DATED: This DAY OF , 1991. M ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood **Also See Exhibit B. 0 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ) I, CHARLES WEISSBURD, Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the Votes Cast for all candidates for the office of City Clerk at the LYNWOOD CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION held on November 5, 1991. I further certify that the total Ballots Cast at the LYNWOOD CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION are as follows: PRECINCT BALLOTS CAST 2,384 ABSENTEE BALLOTS CAST 278 TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 2,662 I further certify that the total votes cast for the office of City Clerk are as follows: PRECINCT ABSENTEE TOTAL City Clerk VOTE VOTE VOTE ANA VENTURA 710 82 792 ANDREA L. HOOPER 1,408 181 1,589 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this 25th day of November, 1991. CHARLES WEISSBURD Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk County of Los Angeles • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ) I, CHARLES WEISSBURD, Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the Votes Cast for all candidates for the office of City Treasurer at the LYNWOOD CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION held on November 5, 1991. I further certify that the total Ballots Cast at the LYNWOOD CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION are as follows: PRECINCT BALLOTS CAST 2,384 ABSENTEE BALLOTS CAST 278 TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 2,662 I further certify that the total votes cast for the office of City Treasurer are as follows: PRECINCT ABSENTEE TOTAL City Treasurer VOTE VOTE VOTE IRIS PYGATT 939 122 1,061 ISADORE HALL, III 683 62 745 DAVID JAMES WILLIS, JR. 546 67 613 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this 25th day of November, 1991. A CHARLES WEISSBURD Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk County of Los Angeles STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ) I, CHARLES WEISSBURD, Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the Votes Cast for all candidates for the two offices of Member of the City Council at the LYNWOOD CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION held on November 5, 1991. I further certify, that the total Ballots Cast at the LYNWOOD CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION are as follows: PRECINCT BALLOTS CAST 2,384 ABSENTEE BALLOTS CAST 278 TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 2,662 I further certify that the total votes cast for the two offices of Member of the City Council are as follows: Member of the PRECINCT ABSENTEE TOTAL City Council VOTE VOTE VOTE MARGARET ARAUJO 675 87 762 LOUIS BYRD 1,215 117 1,332 LOUIS J. HEINE 1,173 161 1,334 ROBERT HENNING 988 107 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal this 25th day of November, 1991. CHARLES WEISSBURD Registrar- Recorder /County Clerk County of Los Angeles CITY OF LYNWOOD - MUNICIPAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMITTEES - 1991 MAYOR: ROBERT HENNING MAYOR PRO TEM: ARMANDO REAL NAME OF ORGANIZATION MEETING DAZE L1Q33a'ATE ALTE[HAXE CALIFCF2aA CTNTRACP C17M ASSOCIATION 3rd Wednesday each month 3880 Flair Drive, Suite 217 7:30 P.M. - alternates El Monte C91 91731 -2825 / (818) 288 -4444 between member City sites CENTRAL BASIN'MMUCIPAL WATER DISMICT Regular, 2nd Wednesday each month 7439 East Florence Adjourned regular, 4th Wednesday Downey, Cu 90240 / (213) 927 -2611 each month, 10:00 A.M. CIO94M OF COMMERCE 2nd Tuesday each month at noon; 3651 Imperial Highway Bateman Ball Lynwood, Ca 90262 / (213) 537 -6484 11331 Ernestine, Lynwood C1mNTr SANIT'ATtw Dun= p1 CF L.A. CO. 2nd Wednesday each month, 1:30 P.M. 1955 Workman Mill Road District Joint Adm. Office Whittier, CA 90601 / (213) 699 -7411 11`IDETE EW C r - AS9OCIATI0N 2nd Thursday at quarterly 14148 Magnolia Boulevard Intervals 7:00 -9:00 P.M. /px Sherman Oaks, CM 91423 / (81 906 -0941 Member Cities serve as host II40EPIIdEMT CTfIES RISK MG r,. AUTHCRIITY _ 2nd Wednesday each month - 14148 Magnolia Boulevard 10:00 A.M. Huntington Park Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 / (818 906-094 Center LEAGUE OF CXJF. CTPIFS - L.A. OFFICE * � _ 1st Thurs. each month, 7 :00 P.M. 900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 404 Luminar Restaurant Los Angeles, CA 90017 / (213) 629 -1422 3500 Puuncna; Monterey Park SCAG (SO. CA. ASSOCIATICH OF GOV'TS) (Exec. Committee- 1st Thurs. 600 S. Commonwealth, Suite 1000 @ 10:00 A.M. no delegate), 3rd Thursday Los Angeles, CA 90005 / (213) 236 -1800 (Transp. S C000zdcation Committee) 9:30 A.M. _ S.E. AREA ANIMAL CXN'1 M AU LCH2IYTC 9777 SEAACA 3rd Thursdays each month Downey, CA 90241 / (213) 803 -3301 2:00 P.M. S.E. MOSCE= ABATE24EfTP DI:S'IItiGT 2nd Thursday each month 9510 South Garfield 7 :30 P.M. same location South Gate, CA 90280 / (213) 927 -6526 JTPA -HaB CITIES S.D.A. 5220 Santa Ana St. Cudahy, CA 90201 As needed * at, Selecti Committee usually meets on the same evening as the League at r,mrinar The Mayor is the State Mandate Representative on this Committee but can delegate the duty on an incident by incident basis. E • [WhIjALS A AW'^�O 1 1 e; I M I ' U' ^ 0 •. te- • I m = I I D. Ift D cnlj w all .......... of..•1 oil .0 ID• As f'. as ••I• 11 110.1111WO:'NI M111114.9 1 �1) 0 I iTAIWO]. • D. za 1 D 1 DID Wm: I N 0 MAYOR: ROBERT HENNING MAYOR PRO TEN: ARMANDO REA NAME OF ORGMHIZATIQI MEE1'ItT1G DATE nFIBM= AUTERU Q CALIERIIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 3rd Wednesday each month 3880 Flair Drive, Suite 217 7:30 P.M. - alternates REA RICHARDS El Monte CL ,91731 -2825 / (818) 288 -4444 between member City sites OTNTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL WARTR DISTRICT Regular, 2nd Wednesday each month 7439 East Florence Adjourned regular, 4th Wednesday REA HEINE Downey, Ca 90240 / (213) 927 -2611, each month, 10:00 A.M. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2nd Tuesday each month at noon; 3651 Imperia Highway Bateman Hall REA Lynwood, Ca 90262 / (213) 537 -6484 .11331 Ernestine, Lynwood CDUNV SANITATION DISTRICT 01 CF L.A. CO. 2nd Wednesday each month, 1:30 P.M. 1955 Workman Mill Road District Joint Adm. Office BEDS Whittier, C1 90601 / (213) 699 -7411 IDIDF ?ENDEN'T CITIES ASSOCIATION 2nd Thursday at quarterly 14148 Magnolia Boulevard intervals 7:00 -9:00 P.M. /pc RIB WELLS Sherman Oaks, Cal 91423 / (818) 906 -0941 Member Cities serve as host IIIDEPFSII>1STT C TI S RISK MMC. AUTHORITY 2nd Wednesday each month - 14148 Magnolia Boulevard 10:00 A.M. Huntington Park RICIIARDS REA Sherman Oaks, Cal 91423 / (818) 906 -094 Recreation Center LEAG3E OF CALIF. Cr= - L.A. CFFICE * _ _ - 1st Thurs. each month, 7:00 P.M. 900 Wilshire Boulevard, Spite 404 Luminaries Restaurant WELLS Ins Angeles, Cap 90017 / (213) 629 -1422 3500 Ramona; Monterey Park _ SCAG (SO. CA. ASSOCIATION OF C;OV'TS) (Exec. Committee- 1st Thurs. 600 S. Cbmmoaiwealth, Suite 1000 @ 10:00 A.M. no delegate), 3rd Thursday HEnZ WELLS Los Angeles, CA 90005 / (213) 236 -1800 (Transp. & Qm=uucation a mmittee) 9:30 A.M. S.E. AREA ANIMAL CCNTRM ALITE11 Ht2TY 9777 SEAACA 3rd Thursdays each month REA HEINE Downey, CA 90241 / (213) 803 -3301 2:00 P .M. S.E. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT 2nd Thursday each month 9510 South Garfield 7:30 P.M. same location REA South Gate, CA 90280 / (213) 927 -6526 n7A - HUB CTlI]ES S.D.A. 5220 Santa Ana St. Cudahy, Cal 90201 As needed WELTS 0 • * City Selection Committee usually meets on the same evening as the League at Lum =ar ias ; The Mayor is time State Mandate Re On this Committee but can delegate the duty on an incident by incident basis. W-Me �67- Z-77 w De.• w OWN moo old, 0 1 DN' 11111118 !TM F - 6A ROBERT HENNING, Mayor LOUIS J. HEINE, Mayor Pro Tem November 14, 1991 of jYNWOOD* (.A Caq Meetolg CI 9fage9 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 Council Members (213)603.0220 ARMANDO REA PAUL H. RICHARDS, II EVELYN WELLS Board of Directors S.E. Mosquito Abatement District 9510 S. Garfield South Gate, Ca 90280 Dear Members of the Board: This is to notify the Board that recent political occurrences demand that I resign my position as a delegate to the S.E. Mosquito Abatement District effective November 14, 1991. Mr. Louis J. Heine, the newly appointed Mayor of the City of Lynwood will take my place. I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that my association with the S. E. Mosquito Abatement District has been an invaluable experience. Overcoming continuing challenges that we have faced as an organization have been of great personal and professional value to me. I have grown to appreciate and respect the considerable talents and skills of each of you. I will truly miss the ongoing relationship that we have established. Sincerely, ROBERT HENNING Councilman 0 0 DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Emilio M. Murga , Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Installation of Stop Signs on State Street at Josephine Street. PURPOSE: To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the installation of'stop signs on State Street at Josephine Street. FACTS o The intersection of State Street and Josephine Street is a "T" intersection, controlled by a stop sign at Josephine Street (for eastbound traffic). o On October 17, 1991, staff was instructed to install stop signs on State Street (for northbound and southbound directions) at Josephine Street, making this a three way stop intersection. o On October 24, 1991, the Traffic and Parking Commission was informed of the installation of the stop signs at said location. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the installation of stop signs on State Street at Josephine Street. C10 -975 K--V 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 67 -9 DESIGNATING CERTAIN INTERSECTION AS "STOP" INTERSECTION. The City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1 : That the following intersection in the City of Lynwood is designated as a "Three Way Stop" intersection and the Traffic Engineer is authorized to erect "STOP" signs: On State Street at Josephine Street, for the northbound and southbound directions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _, 1991. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney day of LOUIS HEINE, Mayor City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: EMILIO M. MURGA, Director of Public Works STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting thereof held in the City Hall of said City on the day of , 1991, and passed by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss. City Clerk, City of Lynwood I, the undersigned,,City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of 1991. City Clerk, City of Lynwood C25 -500 • • DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Emilio M. Murga, Director of Public works�V� SUBJECT: Grant OF Easement To Southern California Edison Company City Hall Parking Lot - 11330 Bullis Road PURPOSE To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution granting a utility easement to Southern California Edison Company. BACKGROUND Southern California Edison has existing underground conduits and a transformer located at the West side of the City Hall parking lot. In order to maintain these facilities Southern California Edison must have a utility easement granted by the City. As part of the review for the Southern California Edison's underground project along Bullis Road from Imperial Highway to Platt Avenue (Dist. 8), it was determined that presently there is no utility easement for Southern California Edison's existing facilities in the City Hall parking lot. DISCUSSION The above mentioned easement is necessary in order for Southern California Edison to continue maintaining its existing facilities in the City Hall parking lot as prescribed by the Public Utility Commission, PUC Rule 16 - section B -2. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council resolution granting a utility easement Edison Company, and authorize the mayor documents. adopt the attached to Southern California to execute the easement CIO- 875/ow ACBMU r= -- I WS 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD GRANTING A UTILITY EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY OF A STRIP OF LAND LYING WITHIN LOT 128 OF TRACT NO. 15209. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lynwood has determined that the easement is necessary for the convenience, welfare, and safety of the public; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the best interest of the City shall be served by granting the said easement; and WHEREAS, utility easement of a strip of land lying within lot 128 of tract no. 15209, also commonly known as 11330 Bullis Road, has been analyzed and approved by the City Engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . The City Council grants a utility easement to the Southern California Edison Company, as designated: (1) A (Five feet wide) strip of land described as follows: Beginning at a point in the Easterly line of Bullis Road 65 feet wide as now established and distant North 19 ° 23' 44" East 340.00 feet from the most Southwesterly corner of lot 128; thence South 70 0 34' 07" East 210 feet; thence North 66 25' 53" East a distance of 82 feet to point A. (2) A (Ten feet wide) strip of land described as follow: Beginning at point A North 70 0 34' 07" West of 15.00 feet. Section 2 . That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the easement documents. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1991. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: LOUIS HEINE, Mayor City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: City Attorney EMILIO M. MURGA �- City of Lynwood Director of Public Works C25 -301 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk do hereby certify that the above and for duly adopted by the City Council of said meeting thereof held in the City Hall of day of 1991, and passed by AYES: NOES: ABSENT: of the City of Lynwood, going resolution was City at a regular the City on the the following vote: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of , 1991. City Clerk, City of Lynwood i 7 C25 -300 'BULUS U IC U 5 . ,?0.73 19.71 Iy 7.4 /SO J� SO O , m O O mo -4 G. C D a 4 O O 0 O . — O • 40 4 o N O O D =- - -- a � 4 �lss:3 so x O ` 14704 4 �J " I " ERNESTI f 1 N 1y I PJ /3S . I H I �p f b w N O m o Ci Iq p _ p a � I 09.74 00.74 ey75 H /35 1(9l3 W o W a o k g • L" O n mo -4 G. C D a 4 O O 0 O . — O • 40 4 o N O O D =- - -- a � 4 �lss:3 so x O ` 14704 4 �J " I " ERNESTI f 1 N 1y I PJ /3S . I H I �p N O m o Ci Iq p _ p a � I Io _ /35 b N O M RD b ill,' N 10 .s l?� lS� C r L A i CITY OF LYNWOOD UTiuTY ErIT �ot_lTH�2N CpuFOKt.11A E��sa.l 1 133o P ��ti 5 2a � LYrtWooG DRWG. 81 CKD. BY I APPROVED BY DATE G L Pr-4 11.27 91 09:15 $213 808 5173 0 Southern California Edison Rosemead, California SCE COMPTON DIST 1 0 Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No Z002 11819 -c" 4836 -E Rule No. to Sheet 3 of 18 SERVICE CONNECTIONS ANO FACILITIES ON CUSTCMER'S PREMISES (Continued) B. Service Connections. (Continued) 1. Overhead Services. (Continued) b. Impaired Clearance. Whenever any of the clearances required by the applicable laws, ordinances, rules, or regulations of public authorities from the service drops to the ground or any object become impaired by reason of any changes made by the owner or tenant of the premises, the customer shall, at his own expense, provide a new and approved support, in a location approved by the Company, for the termination of the Company's existing service drop wires and shall also provide all service entrance conductors and equipment necessitated by the change of location. 2. Underground Service Connections from Underground System. a. General. (1) In areas where the Company maintains an underground distribution system individual service connections (service laterals) will be underground, using the shortest practicable route to the applicant's termination facilities, which shall be at a location satisfactory to the Company. (2) In all instances where the Company owns and maintains on the applicant's property, either a distribution junction box, manhole, transformer, enclosure, or a service lateral, the applicant shall provide without cost to the Company the necessary rights -of -way or easements. (3) In all cases where the Company furnishes at its expense conductors and conduits, the term 'conduit' means the conduit portion of cable -in- conduit. If other types of conduit are required, the applicant will furnish and install them. (4) In those cases where the applicant installs, owns, and maintains a conduit system in which the Company will install Its cables, the specifications of such conduit system and related enclosures shall be subject to the approval of the Company. (Continued) (To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC) Advice 855 -E _Ronald Daniels Date Filed Dec.�B. 1989 Decision Effective _J4p. 27. 1990 Rule16.12 Vice Presi-en Resolution DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Emilio M. Murga, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Selection of Dial -A -Ride Vans PURPOSE To recommend that the City Council review the different types of vehicles available and approve Staff's recommendation. BACKGROUND The budget for FY 1991 -92 calls for the purchase of two (2) new Dial -A -Ride Vans to replace two existing vans that have reached the end of their service life. The two existing vans are 1982 Ford models (units 500 and 501). ANALYSIS: Staff has collected information on 31 different types of vans and other vehicles which meet Dial -A -Ride requirements (Information is available at the City Manager office). The capacity of these vehicles range from 6 to 29 pasengers. The current model of Ford van has proven to be long lasting and its size and capacity are well suited for the program. It is therefore Staff's opinion that the existing vans be replaced with similar type of vehicles. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reviews the different types of vehicles available and approve Staff's recommendation. C10- 890 /mb N • 7 i • DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: THE' HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CI / TY COUNCI FROM: Emilio M. Murga, Director of Public Works Y� SUBJECT: Snorkel (Fire Engine 311) Refurbishment and Engine Diagnostic Machine Purchase PURPOSE To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing staff to obtain informal bids for the refurbishing of the fire Snorkel and the purchase of the engine diagnostic machine. BACKGROUND The fire Snorkel, unit 311, is a 1964 Crown vehicle, and is in need of total refurbishment. The refurbishment of this vehicle has been approved by the City Council and will entail the complete overhaul of the engine, drivetrain, the electrical and hydraulic systems, along with some body modifications and new paint. The purchase of an engine diagnostic machine also has been approved by the City Council. This equipment will facilitate the dignosis and trouble shooting of newer vehicles equiped with complicate electronic and emission control devices. ANALYSIS: The refurbishing of the fire Snorkel, unit 311, and the purchase of the engine diagnostic machine are funded by an ICLFA loan. In order to meet the loan spending schedule, these purchases had to be done in an expeditious manner by obtaining informal bids, to meet the December 2, 1991 deadline. The approximate costs to refurbish the fire Snorkel and the Purchase of the engine diagnostic machine are $128,000 and $24,000, respectively. The City of Lynwood Municipal Code, Section 6 - 3.13, allows these purchases by obtaining a 4/5 vote from the City Council. RECOMMENDATION To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing staff to obtain emergency informal bids for the refurbishing of the fire Snorkel, unit 311, and the purchase of the engine diagnostic machine. C10- 910 /mb AG94U 1= r - I LA A RESOLUTION OF AUTHORIZING THE THE PURCHASE OF INFORMAL BIDS BY RESOLUTION NO. 11 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD REFURBISHMENT OF THE FIRE SNORKEL AND THE ENGINE DIAGNOSTIC ENGINE THROUGH A 4/5 VOTE. WHEREAS, the refurbishment of the fire Snorkel, unit 311, and the purchase of the engine diagnostic machine were approved by the City Council and are funded by an ICLFA loan; and WHEREAS, in order to meet the loan spending schedule deadlines, these purchases need to be done in an expeditious manner, through an informal bidding process; and WHEREAS, these purchases are approximately $128,000 and $24,000 for the refurbishment of the fire Snorkel and the engine diagnostic machine, respectively; and WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood Municipal Code, section 6 -3.13, allows these emergency purchases by a 4/5 vote by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . That the City Council approve the refurbishment of the fire snorkel and the purchase of the engine diagnostic machine through an informal bid by a 4/5 vote. Section 2 . This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. day of LOUIS HEINE, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of Lynwood PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this , 1991. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: EMILIO M. MURG Director of P lic Works 7 C25 -302 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting thereof held in the City Hall of the City on the day of , 1991, and passed by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk, City of Lynwood STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. on file in my office and that said resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this day of , 1991. City Clerk, City of Lynwood C25 -300 r U DATE: TO: W11SIX SUBJECT PURPOSE: December 3, 1991 HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY Kenrick Karefa- Johnson, Director Community Development Department E Tentative Parcel Map No 22905 Case`"No TPM 22 Applicant(s): Roland J. and Helen T. Andersen The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into two (2) parcels, at 3045 and 3047 Redwood Avenue in the R -1 (Single Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. On May 30, 1991, the Site Plan Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to conditions and requirements. 2. On September 10, 1991, the City Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 22, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 3. On September 25, 1991, an appeal was filed by the applicant requesting relief of certain conditions relating to Public Works. 4. This item was continued from the City Council's regularly scheduled meeting of November 5, 1991. ISSUES AND CONCLUSION 1. Section 25 -18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel map be recorded for the subdivision of parcels. 2. The property is located on the North side of Redwood Avenue between Plum Street and Pear Street and is approximately (80' x 130 10,400 sq. ft. (refer to attached location map). 3. The applicant proposes to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2) parcels; one parcel (the Easterly parcel) is intended to be sold in the future. The property has two existing single family homes. Subdivision of the property would be consistent with the General Plan. f: TPM TPM22905 1 �GII�► IT811 0 RECOMMENDATION 0 That the City Council remove certain conditions as requested by the appealant pertaining to Tentative parcel Map No. 22. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2389 3. Letter from applicants attorney (Mr. Scott Nichols) 4. City Council Resolution f: TVM TPK22905 2 LOCATION MAP .y S BEECHW000 J. AVE- g ..J 6 h I N JLA�G: ('• CASE No. _ Tf'Mz2 • RESOLUTION N0, 2380 A RESOLUTION O1. '1'I1L PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22905 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO TWO (2) PARCELS. LOTS 18, 19 AND 20 Of BLOCK R, MODJESKA PARK, RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGES 142 AND 143, of maps, in thr, office of the recorder of the county of Los Angeles. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered, in the case as presented at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map is required for development; and Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905 in the R -1 (Single- Family Residential) zone, should be for the following reasons: A. The subdivision meets all the applicable requirements and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. The proposed subdivision of lots is consistent with the applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the lot. D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all public utilities and public services, including sewers. Section The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905 in the R -1 (Single - Family Residential) zone, subject to the following conditions. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. disk90:reso2389 ATTACHMENT TWO (2) P 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, un :;t 'Inds, and ayrues Lo the condition:: iml<d by the I uutin(I Commission, beCOre any building puI!IIIL!, are issue(! PkANNING DIVISTON 3. Within twenty -four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of Tenative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 4• No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City of Lynwood, a Final Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Sub:_Vlslon Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 5. Extension of the Tenative Map approval shall only be considered if the applicant or his /her representative, submits a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25 -18, of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. 6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. 7. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and pending construction of the proposed addition, and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS /ENGINEERING 8. Submission and recordation of a parcel map is required. 9• Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for sufficient property at northeast corner of Redwood Avenue and Plum Street to accommodate a fifteen (15) foot radius and a five (5) foot dedication on Redwood Avenue. 10. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, and required pavement along Redwood Avenue and Plum Street. 11. Construct one (1) wheelchair ramp(s) at north east corner Of Plum Street and Redwood Avenue. G 300.reso2JB9 Y Sect•on A co delivered to the applicant, co py of this resolution shall be APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of September 1991, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Mushin, Haynes, Love, Pryor, Lee NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner McMiller ABSTAIN: None } jo 4nk. Haynes, Calurperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: n Aarefa Johnson, Dire c ity Development Department disk 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM: • lAw 0..ICC11 i...�c. • wig SIEGEL AND NICHOLS A .nOICN'p NA6 CQ'. RATICN 1i 10 $CAC.. iOULCVAno 6CCONC r�OO• LONG CCACM CAL1fORNIA 90607 TCLCPn ONCi. N-il ii POO1C I2131 506O�A0 'ClecoaC■ ,all) so*.. a as k d• October 29, 1991 City Counoil City of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, California 90262 Re: Appeal of Conditions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905 3045/3047 Redwood Avenue Dear Councilpersons: Our office represents Helen Anderson regarding the conditions imposed. upon the approval of Tentative Parcel Map 22905 by the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood. This Parcel Map Application is a simple division of one large parcel with two existing houses into two smaller parcels with one existing house on each lot. This simple drawing of a property line between the existing houses will have no impact on the environment, and will not create any new traffic, nor any additional impacts on Public facilities. The dividing of this lot into two lots is the classic situation of drawing a line on a map which will have no effect on the existing Public facilities. Under such circumstances, the dedication of five foot of property for the widening of Redwood, the dedication Of a fifteen foot radius at the corner of Redwood and Plum, and the requirement of street improvements on Plum street are unnecessary and inappropriate. Redwood Avenue, westerly of State Street, is not a through street. The two streets having access to Redwood Avenue in this area, Plum street and Pear street cul -de -sac against the proposed Century Freeway and have no through access. This is a small residential area without any through access, and wider streets are not necessary. in fact, Mrs. Anderson would prefer that the streets remain narrower to retain the quiet residential atmosphere of the n eighborhood. Through street circulation in this area is more than adequately provid by State Street, Flower, Lynwood, and imperial Highway. ATTACHMENT THREE (3) • 0 0 City Council, City of Lynwood October 29, 1991 Page 2 There is simply no need to widen the small residential streats in this area westerly of State Street. The existing houses on the property located at 3045 and 3047 Redwood Avenue are currently located nine feet behind the back of the sidewalk. Many of the other residences on the north side of Redwood Avenue in this area are similarly located close to Redwood Avenue. If the five foot dedication requirement is upheld, and Redwood Avenue is eventually widened, the houses in this area will be eleven feet from the street and only four feet from the sidewalk. Since none of the streets in this area are through streets, and there is very little traffic, it makes no sense to widen Redwood Avenue thus moving the houses so much closer to the street and creating four foot front yard setbacks. The Planning Commission has also required certain unknown improvements to the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement along Redwood Avenue and Plum Street. Recently personnel from the City Of Lynwood Public works Department advised Mrs. Anderson that these improvements would involve the followings 1. Extensive repairs of the pavement on Plum Street. �. Reyylaoetent of all of the curb and gutter on Plum Street (app=oalsataly so feet). 3. Replacc =ant of approximately so feet of sidewalk cn Plum Street. 1. Deletion of part of the driveway on Plum street. 3. Replacement of approximately thirty feet of sidewalk on Redwood Avenue. Most of this sidewalk is in front of the neighbor's property Anderson. and should not be the responsibility of Mrs. Mrs- Anderson objects to the requirement of these improvements because they are in no way related to the impact of this subdivision on public facilities. into two existing residential lots The mere dividing of this lot pavement, does not create the need for curb and gutter, and sidewalk improvements. Those improvements were necessitated by normal wear and tear. Thi normal wear and tear to these public facilities should be paid the public in general, not by an individual property owner. As a part of the improvements on Plum Street, the City City Council, City of Lynwood October 29, 1991 Page 3 apparently requiring removal of a portion of the northerly section of Mrs. Anderson's driveway. The removal of this portion of the driveway would result in the loss of one off- street parking space. Off- street parking spaces are very much needed in' this area. Redwood Avenue is posted no parking on the northerly side, Plum Street is posted with limited parking, and additionally there is a fire hydrant on Plum Street on the frontage of Mrs. Anderson's property, further restricting available street parking. Thus, the elimination of a part of the driveway rather than being an improvement, would actually be a detriment by forcing additional on- street parking of vehicles. Mrs. Anderson has been living in this property for over 30 years, and she intends to remain living on the property. She desires to aaintain an amicable relationship with the City of Lynwood. However, I have advised Mrs. Anderson, that in my opinion, the city of Lynwood has gone beyond its authority by imposing the dedication and improvement requirements on this subdivision. In very general terms, the laws of the State of California require that a condition imposed upon the subdivision of property must be reasonably necessary to meet public needs arising as the result of the subdivision. (See Government Code Sections 66475.4) . In a recent California court decision., the Court determined that a very similar dedication requirement was invalid because the private project did not create the need for the street widening requested Icy the City ( Rohn vs. City of Visalia 1989, 214 Cal App 3d 1463, 263 Cal Rptr 319). As I have previously stated, Mrs. Anderson's subdivision of this property into two lots does not create the need for street widening or street improvements. The mere drawing of a line between the two existing residences does not create any new traffic, will not deteriorate the streets, and will not have any effect on the existing public facilities. It is impossible to rationalize how the drawing of this line between the two existing residences has caused the need for street widening or street improvements. There are certain situations in which the expenditure of public funds for Public improvements are appropriate. This is certainly one of those situations. s respectfully requested that the members of ider deletion of Conditions 'lesion Resolution No. 2369. ie conditions are as follows: Nos. 9, lo, an The reasons for the City Council d 11 of Planning the deletion of 1. The widening of Redwood Avenue is not necessary because i City Council, City of Lynwood October 29, 1391 Page 4 none of the streets in this area are through streets. 2. The widening of Redwood Avenue on this property and in this area would leave the existing residence, and most other residences in this area eleven feet from the street and only four foot from the sidewalk. 3. Adequate through traffic circulation is provided by State Street, Flower, Lynwood, and Imperial Highway. 4. The mere drawing of a new property line between the two existing residences on this property does not create the need for street widening and street improvements, and thus there is no legal authority for the imposition of these conditions. We hope you will consider this matter favorably and delete the conditions as requested. Thank you. Sincerely, SIEGEL AND NICHOLS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION COTT NICHOLS SN:bh cc: City Manager Director of Planning City Attorney Helen Anderson RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 22905 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO TWO (2) PARCELS. LOTS 18, 19 AND 20 Of BLOCK 8, MODJESKA PARK, RECORDED IN BOOK 9, PAGES 142 AND 143, of maps, in the office of the recorder of the county of Los Angeles. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map is required for development; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 1991, the City Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2389 approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905, and WHEREAS, the applicant has appealed the Tentative Parcel Map and requested removal of certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby resolve as follows: A. The subdivision meets all the applicable requirements and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. The proposed subdivision of lots is consistent with the applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the lot. D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all Public utilities and public services, including sewers. Section 1. Based upon the following recommendation of the Community Development Director, the following conditions of approval shall pertain to Tentative Parcel Map No. 22905 in the R -1 (Single - Family Residential) zone. f:ptannin9 \resolution \reso2389 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. PLANNING DIVISION Within twenty -four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of Tenative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City of Lynwood, a Final Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. Extension of the Tenative Map approval shall only be considered if the applicant or his /her representative, submits a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25 -18, of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. 7. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel 'Map and pending construction of the proposed addition, and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSZENGINEERIXG 8. Submission and recordation of a parcel map is required. 10. Construct one (1) wheelchair ramp(s) at north east corner of Plum Street and Redwood Avenue. f:planning \resolution \reso2389 0 0 Section 2 . A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Lynwood held on the 3rd day of December, 1991. ATTEST: ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood y Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) Louis Heine, mayor City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: K. Karefa- Johnson Director Community Development Department I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council ofthe City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held on the day of 1 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: f:ptenning \resotu0on \reso2389 City Clerk City of Lynwood 3 DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Gail L. Black, Director of Human Resources Om SUBJECT: BROWN VS. POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PURPOSE To have the Council authorize the Mayor to sign a letter supporting the Poway Unified School District's Petition for Review in the above - referenced suit. BACKGROUND At the October 9, 1991 Independent Cities Risk Management (ICRMA) Governing Board meeting the Brown vs. Poway Unified School District suit was discussed. At that time it was approved and requested that each agency prepare a letter of support for the school district's Petition for Review. The suit involves an outside contractor who was delivering computer equipment to the District Maintenance Office when he slipped on a piece of lunch meat in the hallway. Plaintiff Brown filed suit against the district, alleging the district negligently maintained the facilities building so as to create a dangerous condition. A judgment in favor of the defendant was brought based upon a lack of actual or constructive notice of the presence of lunch meat. Plaintiff appealed, alleging the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur was applicable. Res Ipsa Loquitur is a doctrine of law which permits a plaintiff to prove negligence when he cannot otherwise show how an accident happened. The court's decision permitted the plaintiff to use the "exclusive control" element of Res Ipsa Loquitur by the "inference" that the lunch meat was more likely dropped by an employee of the District, because the meat was on District property. This decision permits Res Ipsa Loquitur to eliminate the actual notice or constructive notice requirement of the Government Code and would make it possible for plantiffs to succeed against a pubic entity for a dangerous condition that was completely unknown. ANALYSIS The ICRMA Governing Board members believe the precedent set by this case could have significant adverse impacts on the costs of defense and thus, ultimately, on the cost of providing liability coverage. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the California Supreme Court supporting the Poway Unified School District's position for Review in the above - referenced suit. AaMMA IT= •ty of YNWOOD v( City �ueeting C6aQQenges I I (I I I 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (213) 6030220 December 3, 1991 The Honorable Chief Justice Malcolm M. Lucas The Honorable Associate Justices of the California Supreme Court 4250 State Building 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 Re: Francis Brown vs. Poway Unified School District Dear Chief Justice Lucas and Honorable Members of the Court: The City of Lynwood is a member of the Independent Cities Risk Management Authority ( ICRMA). ICRMA is a joint powers authority formed pursuant to Government Code Section 6500 et sue to provide insurance coverage for various public entities in Southern California. The City of Lynwood is one of ICRMA's 30 member cities. As a member of the joint powers authority we are highly attuned to the need to balance the sometimes conflicting public policies of providing appropriate compensation to persons injured by action of public entities, while allowing scarce tax dollars to be utilized for public services to the greater extent possible. IN the Tort Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et sea .) expressed its carefully considered determinations as to the circumtances under which governmental entities are to be responsible for tort damages suffered by third parties. The case of Brown vs. Poway Unified School District for which a Petition for Review was filed on October 3, 1991, effects a significant alteration in the balance between those policies as determined by the State Legislature, and as implemented by cities and ICRMA. By allowing the doctrine of res ipsa loauitur to be used to obviate the requirement in Government Code Section 835 that a plaintiff affirmatively establish that a dangerous condition was created by a public employee within the scope of his employment, the Court of Appeal has effectuated a legislative change which is not in accord with the public policy expressed by the State Legislature. 0 our City, therefore, respectfully Petition for Review in this case, i n of this judicial law- making. Sincerely, 0 requests that you grant the order to consider the effect Louis J. Heine Mayor r � W. September 4, 1991 RECEW Et) Mr. Jerry Ciainsky N0y 1211991 CORROON i BLACK ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. eiRSpNNEL p. O. Box 880337 C1 M? O- V San Diego, CA 92168 Re: Brown ?wAY U ifi4d Sch 1 Dislr ct Dear Jerry: Pursuant to your request, there follows a synopsis Of t s im and he potent al future App eal's a statement o this decision. 04828 THE OAHU In this case, plaintiff is an outside contractor. He was delivering computer equipment to the District Maintenance office when he slipped On a piece of lunch meat in the hallway in the building housing the plumbing and electrical shops. His accident did not occur at or near any area where food was kept or eaten. The source of the meat remains mysterious. A motion for summary judgment was successfully brought based upon a lack of actual or constructive notice of the presence Of the lunch meat. plaintiff appealed, alleging the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur was - applicable- The Court of Appeal found that the doctrine was applicable to infer that a District employee caused the lunch meat to be on the floor which raised a triable issue of fact to go to 'the jury as to whether the District was liable. AV�X ARY or APPS LXTZ DE12TSION The Fourth District Court of Appeal tiled a published opinion of its findings. Because it is a published opinion, it now becomes a part of the case law of California. I.W OFF40 ST TrZ, GALLAGHER & pltf1AN0 WXV ADUM A. A M PAY J. AffW nCyLO&OKF� OWF'OM 15TH n0CA FIRST NATIONAL BANK SUILOINO K r 1160 ntaY eT too 00M won R goof JWC$ F. Ma12 4Ot YVEST 'A• STAEET - PANOQ BEFMMO, CAaQ W'r- M IfY WLGN gAN CIE40, CALlfOANIA 92101.7901 /�if.M�Y P MM.+� ,oK,�„►,>wF�sraK �n fAx $19) =.3264 ,,owrae� WXAW W. September 4, 1991 RECEW Et) Mr. Jerry Ciainsky N0y 1211991 CORROON i BLACK ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC. eiRSpNNEL p. O. Box 880337 C1 M? O- V San Diego, CA 92168 Re: Brown ?wAY U ifi4d Sch 1 Dislr ct Dear Jerry: Pursuant to your request, there follows a synopsis Of t s im and he potent al future App eal's a statement o this decision. 04828 THE OAHU In this case, plaintiff is an outside contractor. He was delivering computer equipment to the District Maintenance office when he slipped On a piece of lunch meat in the hallway in the building housing the plumbing and electrical shops. His accident did not occur at or near any area where food was kept or eaten. The source of the meat remains mysterious. A motion for summary judgment was successfully brought based upon a lack of actual or constructive notice of the presence Of the lunch meat. plaintiff appealed, alleging the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur was - applicable- The Court of Appeal found that the doctrine was applicable to infer that a District employee caused the lunch meat to be on the floor which raised a triable issue of fact to go to 'the jury as to whether the District was liable. AV�X ARY or APPS LXTZ DE12TSION The Fourth District Court of Appeal tiled a published opinion of its findings. Because it is a published opinion, it now becomes a part of the case law of California. 0 0 Mr. Jerry Cisinsky septemk UI E D CORROON AND SLACX NOV 1219 fr own V. °nway L*+ {tied School bist. PERSONNEL opinion Th Loquitur andits doctrine apple ation to pub] c ant tisr Res I psa a insa Lgauitur Res Ipsa Loquitur is a doctrine of law which permits show accident happened. The otherwise The classic cass, from old English involved a barrel of flour, walking past a flour upon r warehouse. a He could not prove negligence - of any person inside, but the court permitted a "inference" of negligence from the fact that it was more likely than not that an employee of the flour warehouse was negligent. The necessary elements of Res Ipsa Loquitur are: (1) that the accident must be of a kind which would not happen in the absence of stmeone's negligence] (2) that the agency or instrumentality causing the accident was in the gxclusiya can rol of the defendant; and (3) that there was no voluntary action or contribution to the accident by the plaintiff. The courts decision permitted the plaintiff to satisfy the second condition (exclusive control) by the "inference" that the lunch meat was more likely dropped by an employee of the District, because the meat was on District property. in other words, the court permitted one "inference," that the meat was dropped by an employee, because it was on District property, to satisfy the "exclusive control" element of Res Ipsa, and raise up the second "inference" that the- District was more likely than not negligent. This decision weakens the requirement for "exclusive control of the instrumentality" to the point that there will always be issue r judgment would be Possible Res Ipsa Loquitur cases. We believs that that is an error, j!JIMIa Ent tv Aneliaation More importantly, the court permitted Res Ipsa Loquitur to be applied to an action against a public entity. 0 0 Jerry cisinsky September 4, 1991 Mr. CORROON AND BLACX R��t�" t�D Br v Poway Unified Sc Dist: NOY 12 PERWHiu - The general rule in California is that public OATties , : ":pOD are immune unless a statute provides for their liability. There are basically two methods of finding liability against S, public entity. The first is by showing the ordinary negligence of an employee, and the secondIisord aer ow show d dangerous condition of public property. a dangerous condition Of public property, it is statutorily necessary that the plaintiff prove that the District have actual or constructive notice and sufficient time to correct the dangerous condition. The court's decision sidestepped the notice requirement and concluded that Res Ipsa Loquitur could be permitted to rict raise an issue for the jury whether or not a sehgol District employee dropped the meat. The court, therefore, sidestepped the dangerous condition Cause of Action and permitted the case to go forward as negligence of an unknown District employee, permitting the inference of Res Ipsa Loquitur to raise an issue of fact for a jury whether or not some employee caused the lunch meat to be on the floor. that no This decision do*$ not mak� constructive or actual notice c of a a� l dangerous is necessary. ZUTURA =c o This decision permits Res Ipsa Loquitur to eliminate the actual notice or constructive Government Code and would makeit possible for plaintiffs to succeed against a public entity for a dangerous condition that was completely unknown. In this case, there is absolutely no evidence to indi- cate the source of thr mysterious lunch meat. Because the that hallway plaintiff co equipm it is it l unloading p ikely that the lunch meat was stuck to a computer he was delivering. Mor lunch meat before he fell. By pe permitting t r saw Resipsa the geptem -E��ED Mr. Jerry Cisinsky page 4 CORROON AND SLACK NOV 12 1991 g rown V , Poway Vnified SQhQQ1—Q"1-U PERSONNEL Crw Cr LN..rVOOC • Loquitur to eliminate the notice requirement and sidestep the statutory requirement of "dangerous condition," this decision will be viewed by plaintiffs attorneys as permitting strict liability against public entities. Ws regard this as a second error. sincerely, STUTZ, GALLAGHER 0 ARTIAKO A Professional corporation DANIEL R. SHINOM DRS /svh - CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION NpV 121991 COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PER DIVISION ONE C1"' STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCIS BROWN, ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) V. ) POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ) Defendant and Respondent. ) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Judith L. Haller, Judge. Reversed. James H. Miller and Douglas A. Stocdt for Appellant. Stutz, Gallagher & Artiano, Daniel R. Shinoff, Jack M. Sleeth, Jr. and Susan L. Mason for Respondent. Francis Brown (Brown) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Poway Unified School District (the district) in his action for personal injury. He had based his claim against the district on an accident in which he slipped on a piece of lunch meat on the district's premises, causing him to fall and injure himself. Because the evidence presents questions of fact as to whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may be used to infer D013645 I I M. Kuh. Cr.E D AUG 971991 Court at Ana,l fourth nfsGiC (Super. Ct: No. 604735) 4 liability on the Rdrt of the district, we ld that r l ` WE court erred in granting summary judgment and reverse. li'J! FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACXGROUND NOV 121991 At about 9:30 a.m. on the morning of April 4, 1988, DERSOWNEL Cr^' L "': "100D a self - employed computer repairman, arrived at the district's facilities building to deliver computer equipment he had repaired. ' Michael Olkonen, employed as a delivery worker for the district, helped Brown unload and carry the computer equipment from Brown's van to the plumbing shop, located inside the facilities building. The two men made four or five trips carrying the equipment along the hallway leading from the outside of the building through the electrical shop and then_ along a narrow hallway to the plumbing shop. r After all the computer equipment was unloaded, Brown noticed that a computer had been taken mistakenly into the plumbing shop, so he carried it back into the hallway. There he slipped on a piece of lunch meat and fell, injuring himself - .Brown filed suit against the district, alleging the district negligently maintained the facilities building so as to create a dangerous condition, and further alleging it had • actual or constructive notice of the condition but failed to protect against such condition. Brown also alleged that one or more employees of the district intentionally or negligently S 70 2 left the lunch •t on the hallway floor while in the course R L° INIVU and scope of his or her employment- " The district brought two motions for summary judgm n 1 �[* first was denied without prejudice; the second was gra��I 0 the district's favor. C1T' v• ,� Brown appeals, contending the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. He maintains the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur can be applied to the facts of the case to infer that a district employee caused the lunch meat to be on the floor, thus raising an issue of fact as to the district's liability. DISCUSSION Under Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, a trial court must grant summary judgment if no triable issue of material fact exists and the motion papers entitle the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. (Gt ratton v. Rir Nat, Li Ins Lg_, (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1071, 1083.) "The purpose of the summary procedure is to penetrate through evasive language and adept pleading and ascertain the existence or absence of triable issues.' (C rn V . Bank of America (1976) 15 Cal.3d 865, 873.) The trial -court determines whether triable issues exist by examining the affidavits and evidence before it and An employee's bringing of food to the work site for his or her- own use may be considered within the scope of his or her employment. ' ( neMiriian v. TAea1 •Heating nra. (1954)• 129 Cal.App.2d 758, 765.) 3 drawing reasonable inferences therefrom. packing Co. (1974) 44 Cal.App.3d 56, 61 -64.) e � e� O affidavits of the moving party are to be strictly constd those of the opponent liberally construed (citation] . G\ �` a party opposing a motion for summary judgment which is supported by affidavits or declarations sufficient to sustain the motion, has the burden of showing that triable issues of fact exist.' (Chem V. Bank of meri , quo rg, 15 Cal.3d at P. 873.) (1987) 196 Cal-App-3d In DD lgcuist v. rity of get lflowe. 261, the court stated: -Whereas in the case at bar, a defendant seeks summary judgment, his declarations and evidence must either establish a complete defense to plaintiff's f an essential element of an absence of plaintiff's case. If defendant establishes the foregoing, and the plaintiff's declaration in reply does not show that there is a triable issue of fact with respect to that defense or that an meet essential element exists, the summary 2G ju judgment should s £n be granted,.' Ud. at P. original.) Upon review the appellate court examines the facts presented to the trial judge on the summary judgment motion and determines their effect as a matter of law. ( stmt= v. First gat Life Ins. Go. ci�ynra 210 Cal.App.3d at p. 1083.) Under Government Code section 835, •(e]zcept as provided by statute, a public entity is liable for injury caused by a dangerous condition of it property if the plaintiff establishes that the property was is a dangerous condition at the time of the, 4 injury, • that the injury was proximately caused by the dangerous condition, that the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injury which was incurred, and that either: ♦_ O(a) A negligent or wrongful act or omission LU M w: z' of an employee of the public entity within ^a 5- the scope of his employment created the >: Z dangerous condition; or W F •(b) The public entity had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition under Section 835.2 a sufficient time prior to the injury to have -taken measures to protect against the dangerous condition.' In its motion the district argued summary judgment was compelled because Brown was unable to prove any district employee had personal knowledge of the lunch meat on the floor or the district had actual or constructive notice of its presence, thus preventing Brown from proving all essential requirements to establish liability. None of the individuals present at the time of the accident admitted bringing lunch meat into the hallway, and each stated he or she had looked at I the floor before the accident and had not observed any lunch meat there. Also, there was no evidence the district had notice of the hazard. According to the district's statement of undisputed material facts, no one saw the lunch most before the accident. Brown stated in deposition he did not notice anything on the floor before he slipped and fell. He also stated he had seen people eating their lunches in the area on other days. 5 Olkonen stated that on the day of the accident he ha+ned,�'5� the building and walked down the hall between 7:3Q„�'�t'Id 8�)r0 <,s. a.m. and had returned between 9 and 9:30 a.m., neve lunch meat on the floor. He said he also looked at the hallud floor when he helped Brown carry the computers, but did not see any lunch meat. Phyllis Hards, an employee of the district, declared that she had walked through the hallway before the accident, but saw no lunch meat on the floor. Hards also stated the doors to the plumbing and electrical shops, as well as the external door to the facilities building, were usually locked. Edward Balles, an independent contractor who had come to the facilities building that morning to pick up blades for sharpening, declared he carried no lunch meat into the area, nor did he see anyone else there with lunch meat. Custodian Ernest Lemire stated he had swept the hallway floor on Friday, April 1, 1988, three days before the date of the accident. He said part of his job was to inspect the facilities building for dangerous conditions, and further stated it was his practice to remove any slipping hazards he found on the floor. In opposition to the district's motion for summary Judgment, Brown argued be was not required to prove that a district employee had caused the meat to be on the floor because a finder of fact could infer employee negligence under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. 6 0 0 '(TJhe 'doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable where the accident is of such a nature that it can be said, in the light of past experience, that it probably was the result of negligence by someone and that the defendant is probably the one responsible." ( Newing v. Cheatham (1975) 15 Cal.3d 351, 359, quoting Di Mare v. mer (1962) 58 Cal.2d 292, 29E -299.) Three conditions are necessary to apply the doctrine: " (1) the accident must be of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of 0 0 p someone's negligence; (2) it must be caused LU rn O by an agency or instrumentality within the > C" z, exclusive control of the defendant; (3) it M� C', Z', must not have been due to any voluntary UJ -.4 action or contribution on the part of the plaintiff." ( Ybarra v. Spangard (1944) 25 UA Z v Cal.2d 486, 489.) A The evidence need not show that the accident must have happened because of someone's negligence, but that in the light of past experience the accident probably was caused by the negligence of someone. QiMare v. Cresci jug= 58 Cal.2d at pp. 298 -299.) We turn to the first condition -- whether the accident is one which would not ordinarily occur in the absence of someone,'s negligence. in deciding if this condition is satisfied, courts generally consider common knowledge and experience, the testimony of expert witnesses and the circumstances relevant to the particular accident in the case. 7 • ( Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co (1952) 0 39 Cal.2d�# Common experience indicates Brown probably would not �avg' slipped on lunch meat in the hallway in the absenct&'of someone's negligence. Someone must have dropped the lunch meat on the hallway floor. The second condition, exclusivity of control, is a flexible concept. (Zebu, A112Ld, 39 Cal.2d at pp. 443 -444.) "[R]es ipsa loquitur applies where the accident is of such a nature that it can be said, in the light of past experience, that it probably was the result of negligence by someone and that the defendant is probably the person who is responsible.' (;$. at p. 446.) "Although the doctrine will,not ordinarily apply if it is equally probable that the negligence was that of someone other than the defendant, the plaintiff need not exclude all other persons who might possibly have been responsible where the defendant's negligence appears to be the more probable explanation' of the accident." ( at pp. 443 -444.) 2 Courts have found this ,condition satisfied in a variety of -factual situations. '(See, e.g., Zentz S.lipra 39 Cal.2d at p. 447 [exploding bottle of carbonated beverage]; Raher v. Tumi11 (1951) 36 Cal.2d 654, 659 [falling ladder]; Baker v. B. F. Goodrich Co. (1953) 115 Cal.App.2d 221, 223 [bursting automobile tire]; Owens v. White Memorial Hospital (1956) 138 Cal-APP-2d-634, 639 [rail of hospital bed fell on plaintiff]; McFarland v. Bow (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 402, 412 [rear -end collision]; Pappas v. Carson (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d' 261, 269 [fire from overloading electrical circuits or from defective wiring]..) 8 The third Airement of res ipsa Ouitur is that the accident must not be due to action by the plaintiff. Although Brown obviously *participated" in the accident by stepping on the lunch meat, such conduct does not automatically constitute him a voluntary contributor to the negligence. This third requisite for res ipsa loquitur is not congruent with the concept of contributory negligence, but looks instead to find conduct so participatory in damage causation as to preclude the inference that the defendant's negligence caused the accident. ( McFarland v. Souk „r, suns , 250 Cal.App.2d 402, 412.) "The plaintiff need not show that he was entirely inactive at the time of the accident in order to satisfy this requirement, so long as the evidence is such as to eliminate h►is conduct as a factor contributing to- the occurrence.' ( Newina v. Cheatham Supra 15 Cal.3d at p. 363.) He may rely on the res ipsa loquitur doctrine even if he participated in the events leading to the accident, as long as his action was not the primary cause. ( Hercules etc. Co. v,. Automatic ate. Co;p. (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 387, 396.) The requirement that the defendant be in exclusive control of the instrumentality which caused the injury means only that the plaintiff's 'use of the • instrumentality must not have been the primary cause of the accident. (jma ric v. Raleigh Hills Hospital (1982) 133 Ca1.App.3d 575, 585 -586; 57B Am.Jur.2d, Negligence, § 1213, p. 127..) Thus, even a conclusion that Brown was contributorily 9 negligent in failing to notice the meat would not preclude application of the res ipsa loquitur concept. Where there is a question of fact as to any of the conditions required for application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, the issues are properly determined by a finder of fact. ( Newina v• Cheatham guar 15 Cal.3d at p. 359; Keena V. scalps (1964) 61 Cal.2d 779 -783; Hansen V. Matich Cgrooration (1965) 234 Cal.App.2d 129, 133.) Here, each of the three elements necessary to application of the doctrine was established at least to a degree sufficient to create a factual question for trial determination. Thus, the granting of summary judgment was improper. We must address, however, certain arguments raised by the district which assert that its nature as a public entity precludes utilization of res ipsa loquitur in this case. The district contends its liability in tort is limited to specific statutorily created, exceptions from the general rule of governmental immunity. (Gov Code, § 815.) The statute- upon which a claim of liability is based - in this case depends upon the existence of a 'dangerous condition." The district further contends that liability for damage caused by a dangerous condition is dependent upon the governmental entity's having either actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condi- tion, and res ipsa loquitur is an inappropriate device for the proof of notice. 10 The districoreads the governing 5 *ute too narrowly. Government Code section 835, upon which plaintiff bases his case, contains two alternative conditions of liability: either that the public entity 'had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition" (subsection (b)) 9z that the dangerous -condition was caused by the negligent act of an employee of the public agency. As stated in Van Alstyne, California Government Tort L•iabilitx Practice (1980) "Dangerous Conditions of Public Property,' § 3.17b, p• 208: •when the alleged basis of entity liability for a dangerous property condition is negligent or wrongful creation of the condition, plaintiff is not required to establish either actual or constructive notice to the entity. The creation by the public entity of a physical facility or condition that is 'dangerous' dispenses' with the necessity of notice, for the entity presumably knows already that it has affirmatively created the condition, and thus has notice that it is dangerous. The plaintiff in this case bases his claim upon alleged affirmative negligence by a public entity employee, rather than simply on the existence of a.dangerous condition which was not remedied. Thus, the notice requirements of subsection (b) have no application. As a result, the argument that res ipsa loquitur cannot be used _to show notice of the dangerous condition to the public entity has no application. The district nevertheless presses its argument that the concept of res ipsa loquitur is somehow inappropriate in an 11 action against a entity. As the d &rict contends, the logical steps Of circumstantial evidence utilized by res ipsa loquitur to infer negligence do not seem appropriate for production of an inference of notice. (See van Alstyne, JuPZA, at § 3.80, p. 308: 0 . .. . the carefully prescribed statutory standards for determining when actual or constructive notice exists . . . do not appear to leave room for application of the doctrine Iof res ipsa ioquiturl.) (See also van Dorn v. City & County of (1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 714, 716, in which the court stated, without citation of authority, that "res ipsa does not apply" to proof of notice to the City of the defective condition.) There seems no reason, however, why res ipsa loquitur cannot be used to raise an inference of simple negligence as set forth in alternative (a) of Government Code section 835. We note that Government Code section 830.5 states: '[TIhe happening of the accident which results in the injury is not in and of itself evidence I that public property was in a dangerous condition." However, this 'statutory statement of a legal truism is preceded by the caveat 'Except where the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur' is applicable." The Senate Legislative committee's Comment to this legislation, which was adopted in- 1963, states: the section does not prevent the use of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in appropriate cases." (See 12 5 legis. committee • m., 32 West's Ann. G • Code (1980 ed.) S 830.5, P. 281.) Van Alstyne suggests that the "appropriate" ease would simply be one in which "all of the requisites of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine are satisfied," and makes reference to a number of cases which invoke res ipsa in analogous situations in private tort litigation. (Van Alstyne, U= , § 3.80 at p. 307.) Interestingly, it appears there is no judicial decision specifically approving the use of res ipsa loquitur to establish negligence by a governmental employee. We see no 3 The present statutory framework for governmental immunity and statutory liability was adopted in 1963. The previous statute, the Public Liability Act of 1923, had no provision similar to subdivision (a) of Government Code section 835. Nevertheless, it had been held that governmental entities were liable under that act for dangerous conditions created by the negligence of their employees. ( Pritchard v. Sully- Miller Contractina Co. (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 246.) (See legis. committee com. -- senate, 32 West's Ann. Gov. Code (1980 ed.) 5 835, P. 301.) An old case decided under this former law held that a plaintiff suing for damage resulting from a broken city water main could rely upon res ipsa loquitur, after having established that the break was the kind which would not ordinarily occur absent negligence "in the management of the system. ( Ruffums' v. City of Lena Reach (1931) 111 Cal. App. 327, 328 -330.) In Anderson v. County of Santa Cruz (1959) 174 Cal.App.2d 151, where the court applied the same law of governmental liability, it was held that the trial court was correct in refusing to give an instructiod on res ipsa loquitur in a case of damage resulting from fire. It is evident in that case, however, that the basis for the refusal to give the instruction was that the plaintiff had failed to establish one of the elements of res ipsa - loquitur, namely that the instrumentality causing damage (the fire) was under the exclusive control of the defendant governmental entity. (Id. at pp. 154, 155.) 13 reason, however, not to adopt the reason • of Professor van Alstyne. If a governmental entity is exposed to liability based upon the negligent conduct of its employees, and the "negligence' in question is defined as is negligence in any other circumstance, it seems logical that the plaintiff can establish the negligence by the same evidentiary means available to any other defendant. To summarize:. There is no reason why Brown could not rely upon the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to establish a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the school district. Brown was required only to establish those traditional requisites for the doctrine -- in terms of evidence from which a finder of fact could conclude the requisites established. We believe Brown did this. The meat was on the floor of the hallway, and appeared fresh when removed from the heel of Brown's boot. Access to the hallway was through a door usually locked by keys controlled by district employees. Vendors or 'visitors could enter only after an employee had unlocked the door. An employees lounge and a picnic table were provided at the building. Brown stated he had seen people eating lunch in the area. -He further stated be did not bring the meat into the hallway. in inference can be made it was unlikely that Brown, at the building for the purpose of delivering computers, or Balles, there to pick up saw blades, would have had any reason to carry lunch meat into the hallway. This was not an area frequented by students or people other than district 14 employees. A jury could have found it morerobable than not that a district employee was responsible. Here, the evidence presents a question of fact as to whether the conditions required for application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur are present. In that this is an issue properly decided by a finder of fact, we hold the court erred in granting summary judgment. (Cf. Morena v• eavre (1989) 162 Cal.App.3d 116, 125.) DISPOSITION The judgment is reversed. CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION ' FROEHLICH, J. WE CONCUR: WIENER, Acting P.J. - r HUFFMAN, J. 15 I 9 DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Michael T. Heriot, City Manager F 6 h " BY: Lorry Torres, Administrative Assistant to e City Manager SUBJECT: ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES - AWARD OF CONTRACT PURPOSE To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution replacing SEAACA and the in -house dog licensing program with Los Angeles County Department of Animal Control provided services effective July 1, 1992. In the August 20, 1991 City Council Meeting, Council directed staff to pursue a contract with the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Control to provide animal control services and administer the animal licensing program. The selection will result in the replacement of the present provider, SEAACA (Southeast Area Animal Control Authority), the lose of investment on the SEAACA property, and the discontinuance of the in -house licensing program that the City Clerk Office is currently providing. Triggering the decision were SEAACA's 308 increase in animal control service cost bringing the cost of animal control services and in -house licensing program to a budget of $195,546 and a competitive offer from the County to provide daily animal control services and to administer the animal licensing program for a staff projected cost of $125,760 for FY 91 -92. Upon Council decision, we have notified SEAACA of our intention to withdraw from the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and have started negotiating with the County on the contract terms. (Please see Attachment A and B ) SEAACA's Executive Director in his August 27th letter has expressed his desire to have the City remain with the JPA for FY 91 -92. He asserted that Lynwood's cancellation of the agreement will create a hardship on the remaining SEAACA members. Upon deliberation by SEAACA Board Members, SEAACA then submitted a second proposal that reflects an overall reduction of cost for each member city. (Attachment C) If the City agrees to remain with SEAACA, the City's cost will only increase by 8% as oppose to 30 %, thereby, bringing the animal control service cost down to $163,328. (Attachment D) According to SEAACA, the result of cost cutting will mean less hours of service and a decline in the quality of service being provided because the number of field officers will be reduced from 11 to 8, the field Sergeants from 2 to 1, the clerical staff by 338, and the Shelter staff by 288. In the meantime, Staff, after reviewing the County's contract proposal, responded with a request for a 5% cap on any rate increase, a three month notification by the County of new rates for the forthcoming fiscal year, and termination by both parties at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice. (Attachment E) As the County contract now stands, the following are the significant provisions in the proposal: t AGE" IYIDI ! • o The County is allowed to adjust the rates annually effective July 1st of each fiscal year, o The City may terminate the Agreement at anytime upon a (30) days written notice to the County, and o The City must enact an ordinance identical with the provision of Division 1, Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code, ANALYSIS Based on the updated proposals from SEAACA and the County we have modified the previous cost analysis to reflect changes in the contract cost. Below is a 3 year cost projection if the contract had started in FY 91 -92. OPTION 1 PROVIDER: SEAACA DOG LICENSING PROGRAM: IN -HOUSE (CITY CLERK) FY 91 -92 Cost of Service Estimated Cost of Licensing Admin. With No Canvassing: Less Estimated Cost of Annual Revenue With No Canvassing: $163,328.00 $ 22,000.00 FY 92 -93 $179,015.00 $ 23,100.00 FY 93 -94 $187,966.00 $24,255.00 ($ 22,300.00) ($ 23,415.00) ($ 24,585.75) NET' COST TO THE CITY: $163,028.00 $178,700.00 $187,635.25 Considered in the estimated net cost are the following: • a 58 increase in licensing administration cost • a 58 increase in revenues collected OPTION 2 PROVIDER: LA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL DOG LICENSING PROGRAM: LA COUNTY FY 91 -92 Cost of Service Estimated Cost of Licensing Admin. With Canvassing: Less Estimated Cost of Annual Revenue With Canvassing: $139,740.00 $ 37,180.00 FY 92 -93 $153,714.00 $ 40,898.00 FY 93 -94 $169,085.40 $ 44,987.80 ($ 76,160.00) ($ 82,252.80) ($ 88,833.02) Start Up Cost: $ 25,000.00 S 0.00 $ 0.00 NET COST TO THE CITY: $125,760.00 $112,359.20 $125,240.18 Considered in the estimated net cost are the following: • a 10% increase in the cost of service, • a 10% increase in licensing administration and canvassing, and • an 8% increase in revenues collected. However, the earliest time that the City can withdraw from SEAACA will be in the mid FY 91 -92. The City would still be obligated to pay for services rendered by SEAACA from July 1, 1991 - December 31, 1991. Staff has estimated the cost of a mid year withdrawal from SEAACA and compared it with withdrawing effective FY 92 -93 and with remaining with SEAACA. COST PROJECTION OF A MID YEAR WITHDRAWAL FROM SEAACA FOR FY 91 -92 JULY -DEC SEAACA Cost of Service: Estimated Cost of Licensing Admin.: Canvassing: Less Estimated Annual Revenue: FY 91 -92 FY 92 -93 FY 93 -94 TOTAL 3 YEAR COST: $ 98,617.00 $ 11,000.00 JAN -JUNE COUNTY $ 69,870.00 $ 9,900.00 $ 0.00 $ 23,980.00 ($ 11,150.00) ($ 58,370.00) $ 98,467.00 $ 45,380.00 NET COST TO THE CITY: $143,847.00 Start Up Cost: $25,000.00 FY 91 -92 NET COST TO THE CITY AFTER THE START UP COST: $168,847 FY 91 -92 MID YEAR WITHDRAWAL FROM SEAACA VS. FY 92 -93 WITHDRAWAL FROM SEAACA FY 91 -92 MID YEAR WITHDRAWAL $168,847.00 $112,359.20 $125,240.18 $406,446.38 A FY 92 -93 WITHDRAWAL $163,328.00 $137,359.20 $125,240.18 $425,927.38 B REMAIN WITH SEACCA $163,028.00 $178,700.00 $187,635.25 $529,363.25 C DIFFERENCE (B -A)= $ 19,481 DIFFERENCE (C -B)= $103,435 DIFFERENCE (C -A)= $122,916 0 0 1Y Replacing SEAACA with County provided services is still relatively lower in cost. By replacing SEAACA with the County in mid FY 91 -92 the City can potentially save about $123,000 over a 3 year period in comparison to remaining with SEAACA for the next 3 years. It is also an option to have the City remain with SEAACA for the remainder of the year and to have the City withdraw from SEAACA effective July 1, 1992. The potential savings for this decision will be about $103,000 over a 3 year period as oppose to remaining with SEAACA. Staff requests that Council consider that although the City may save about $19,000 for the next three years if the City decides to withdraw from SEACCA in mid FY 91 -92, the savings may be outweighed by the costs of potential litigation brought by the JPA and of ensuing bad faith relationship with other cities that would be forced to cover the costs for a withdrawing member. SEAACA as urged by member cities did make an effort to lower its costs in consideration of the City's concern with the substantial 308 increase. The language of Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code reads the same as Chapter 8 of the Lynwood Municipal Code. Adopting the language will promote uniformity of enforcement with the other cities that has contracted with the County. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution: 1) Replacing SEAACA as the animal control provider with the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Control, 2) Replacing the present in -house dog licensing program being provided by City Clerk with the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Control, 3) Authorize staff to work on adopting Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code, 4) Authorizing the Mayor to execute a five -year contract commencing in July 1, 1992 with the Los Angeles County with a stipulation that the City may terminate the contract upon a 30 day written notice at any time. control2 0 0 SEAACA AND COUNTY COST COMPARISON ON A 3- YEAR PROJECTION (NET COST INCLUDING ESTIMATED REVENUES) $200,000.00 $187,635.25 $178,700.00 $180,000.00 $ 63,028.00 $160,000.00 $140,000-00 ::$125: 760.00 :.$125. 240. 18 $120,000.00 $112359.20 ❑ SEAACA $100,000.00 $80,000.00 ❑ COUNTY $60,000.00 $40,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 :... FY 91 -92 FY 92 -93 FY 93 -94 ESTIMATED THREE YEAR COST COMPARISON $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 MID YEAR FY 92 -93 REMAINING WITHDRAWAL WITHDRAWAL WITH SEAACA FROM SEAACA FROM SEAACA RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CONTROL TO PROVIDE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES. WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood presently receives animal control services from the Southeast Area Animal Control Authority ( SEAACA); WHEREAS, SEAACA projects the City's share of cost for FY 91 -92 to be $163,328, an 8% increase from last year's proposal and for FY 92 -93 to be $179,015, a 9.6% increase from the previous year's estimate; WHEREAS, the City presently administers the dog licensing program at a cost of about $22,000 whereby an average of $23,000 in revenues are collected; WHEREAS, for FY 92 -93, the County can provide similar services including the dog licensing program and canvassing for a net cost of $137,359, which includes a $25,000 start up fee; WHEREAS, the City can potentially save about $103,00 over a three year period by contracting with the County starting FY 92 -93 and withdrawing from SEAACA; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the City Council does hereby approve the replacement of the present animal control services being provided by SEAACA with Los Angeles County Department of Animal Control. SECTION 2: That the City Council approve the replacement of an in -house dog licensing program with Los Angeles County Department of Animal Control. SECTION 3: That the City Council authorize staff to work on the adoption of Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code in place of the Lynwood Municipal Code, Chapter 8 Animal Control Ordinance. SECTION 4: That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute a five -year contract effective July 1, 1992 with the Los Angeles County with a stipulation that the City may terminate the contract upon a 30 day written notice to the County. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of . 1991 LOUIS HEINE, MAYOR City of Lynwood ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ty Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT Michael T. Heriot City Manager c- contro WFIC[ OF THE MY KANAQVk September 12, 0 0 cit of ]LYNWOOD 1991 ,—A Cat, „ueetI>iq C606ga 11330 sULUS ROAD LYNWOOD, CAUFORNIA 80282 (213) 803.0220 Dan Morrison Executive Director Southeast Area Animal Control Authority 9777 SEAACA Street Downey, CA 90241 Dear Mr. Morrison: It was a pleasure to meet with you on September 3, 1991 to discuss the City's relationship with SEAACA. As we discussed, our city Council voted to withdraw from the Authority at its regularly scheduled meeting of August 20, 1991. During our discussion you pointed out several areas of concern that you felt may have been overlooked or inappropriately assessed as to the City remaining with the Authority. My staff has thoroughly analyzed all of the issues you raised, reviewed and critiqued all of the data you provided, and I am still convinced that we should proceed per the City Council's directions. Therefore, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Lynwood, I am requesting that you agendize the matter of the City's withdrawal at your next regularly scheduled board meeting. I spoke with your staff person, Darlene, late today to confirm that my Assistant, Faustin Gonzalez, had requested that this matter be placed on your agenda. I further informed her that we would,be faxing this correspondence on Friday morning September 13, 1991. Specifically, it is our intent to withdraw from the Authority as early as possible during the second qudrter of the period between today and December 31, 1991. We regret having to take this action, however, a thirty percent (30 %) increase in our assessed fees dictates that we must. C' n, /\ /m e w %r i; I, I 0 1 ATTACHMENT A Dan Morrison September 12, 1991 page' You raised the issue of your anticipated recommendation to your board that they not accept our intent to withdraw. You indicated that this was because of the financial hardship our withdrawal would impose and the fact that we did not meet the notice requirements as outlined in Section III of our agreement. We would not be making this move were it not for the tremendous hardship that the 308 increase caused us. Furthermore, you did not notify us until some time in June, as you acknowledged during our meeting on September 3, 1991, of our impending increase. You pointed out that you had not because the negotiations with your employees did not conclude until then. Certainly had you informed us prior to April 1, 1991 about this increase due to our population increase and the settlement with your employees, the City would have been in a position to anticipate our possible withdrawal and notify you to that effect. Finally, as stated earlier, we regret having to withdraw from the Authority, however the increase from $151,230 to $196,546 represents a severe financial hardship on Lynwood and we are obligated at this time to proceed with our withdrawal. Sincerely, Michael T. Heriot City Manager cc: Honorable Mayor Robert Henning and Members of the City Council anints8 0 0 City ce LYNWOOD LA DN Aemag cloQQenge9 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90282 (213) 803.0220 November 5, 1991 Mr. Frank R. Andrews, Director Department of Animal Care and Control 11258'S. Garfield Avenue Downey, CA 90242 Dear Mr. Andrews: Thank you for submitting a contract proposal for our consideration. We have reviewed your proposal and have determined that controlling factors in the contract cost need to be included. We believe that the following stipulations will protect both the City and the County's interest. We propose that in Section 11 of the contract the following language be inserted as follows: The foregoing rates shall be adjusted by the County Auditor- Controller annually, effective July 1st of each year commencing July 1, 1991, to reflect the cost of such service in accordance with such rates as determined by the County Auditor - Controller and as approved by the Board of Supervisors of County. However, in no case, shall this annual rate adjustment exceed five percent (58) of the previous year's cost service. The County further agrees, through the Department of Animal Care and Control to provide, on or before March 30 of each year, the rates for all animal control services to the City for the forthcoming fiscal year. (Note: The remaining language in Section 11 shall remain the same.) And that in Section 9 of the contract the last sentence regarding City notice of termination be modified as follows: ATTACHMENT B The CitWay terminate this agreeat at any time by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the County. We are confident that you will find that the stipulations set forth above are necessary to allow our City to plan its budget accordingly by being informed of the service cost prior to the adoption of an annual budget. We understand that the County will have to adjust its rates as necessitated by rising cost of living. This is evident by the placement of a 5% increase allowance on the animal control service cost. On the other hand, by placing a ceiling on any rate adjustment, we protect the interest of our citizens from an unexpected substantial cost increase. We hope we can reach an agreement by November 13, 1991 for our City Council consideration on November 19, 1991 Regular Meeting. Upon City Council authorization to contract with the County, the City desires to start its contract on January 1, 1992. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (213) 603 -0220, extension 202. Sincerely, Michael T. Heriot City Manager animals? SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY A rent Personnel Roster • Classifications ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT Authority Director Operations Manager Executive Secretary Division Total FIELD OPERATIONS Sergeant Animal Control Officer Division Total SHELTER OPERATIONS Senior Shelter Operator Shelter Operator Senior Dispatcher /Clerk Dispatcher Clerk Division Total VETERINARY SERVICES Veterinarian Senior Veterinary Assistant Veterinary Assistant Division Total ORGANIZATIONAL TOTAL 9 Budgeted Positions 1991 -92 1 1 1 3 2 11 13 1 7 1 4 2 15 1 1 2 4 35 I i I 0 — 1 ATTACHMENT C SOUTH 0T AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AU &RITY CURRENT HOURS OF SERVICE FIELD OFFICERS Daily 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight. * Routine requests for services are taken until 9:00 p.m. * Emergency requests are taken 24 -hours daily. FRONT OFFICE Clerical: Monday through Saturday 8:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. Dispatch: 24 hours daily. KENNEL: Kennels are staffed seven days a week 7:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. Kennels are open to the public Tuesday through Saturday 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. * Closed Sunday and Monday VETERINARY DIVISION: Tuesday through Saturday, 10:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. * Spay /Neuter surgeries are scheduled Wednesday Friday. through (3-:2 SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY CURRENT FIELD OFFICER TIME (Based on Fiscal Year 1990 -91) Total Available Service Hours: 22,880 (11 Officers) BREAKDOWN: Percentage I 0 of Total Requests from public: 81726 38.148 Impounding and Reports: 7,350 32.128 Patrol: 2,953 12.918 Observations: 1 5.478 Special Activities: 128 .568 Leave time: 2,471 10.808 (vac., sick and personal leave)) I 0 1 16 Wimm""Mm"W" '4`i Ra "A rl!'+ P2 MIN W THEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUIMITO SUMMARY OF REVENUES Assuming an Increase of 8% to 1990 -91 Figures for Contributions Full Fiscal year, Including Lynwood Current Population Adopted Revised I Base 1991 -92 (+ up$ !CITY CONTRIBUTIONS Bell Gardens Downey Lynwood Montebello Norwalk Paramount Pico Rivera Santa Fe Springs South El Monte Vernon (Figures from California Population Research) Subtotal 43,100 92,100 62,700 59,900 95,100 49,600 59,500 15,500 21,250 n/a 498,750 Cost Adjusted Savings Per Capita $135,579 $116,489 (!19,090) 2.7028 289,717 264,002 (25,715) 2.8665 197,234 163,328 (33,906) 2.6049 188,426 177,015 (11,411) 2.9552 299,154 276,168 (22,986) 2.9040 156,026 135,194 (20,832) 2.7257 187,168 174,277 (12,891) 2.9290 48,758 48,250 (238) 3.1129 66,846 56,876 (9,970) 2.6765 3,000 3,100 $1,571,908 $1,414,699 ($157,039) 2.8365 OPERATIONAL REVENUES Adopted Revised Shelter $75,000 $87,000 Veterinary 145,000 115,000 Interest 16,000 4,000 Miscellaneous • 6,000 6,000 Sale of Vehicles Refunds on Insurances Subtotal $242,000 $212,000 $1,813,908 $1,626,699 Carryover Funds $100,794 $100,794 Notation- Per Capita In original adopted budget was $3.1457 1 1 E SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Revised Revised Adopted First Second Revised 1991 -92 Half Half Total Division Administrative Support Personnel Services $169,739 $84,870 $84,870 $169,740 Maintenance and Operations 368,693 241,192 93,970 335,162 Capital Outlay 3,100 900 0 900 Subtotal $541,532 $326,962 $178,840 $505,802 Field Operations Personnel Services $443,579 $222,508 $158,788 $381,296 Maintenance and Operations 65,370 26,945 23,395 50,340 Capital Outlay 24,500 21,474 0 21,474 Subtotal $533,449 $270,927 $182,183 $453,110 Shelter Operations Personnel Services $393,479 $187,116 $160,827 $347,943 Maintenance and Operations 159,386 76,000 76,500 152,500 Capital Outlay 10,200 4,390 0 4,390 Subtotal $563,065 $267,506 $237,327 9504,833 Veterinary Services � Personnel Services $136,511 $70,309 $66,584 $136,894 Maintenance and Operations 39,350 17,675 17,675 35,350 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 Subtotal $175,861 $87,984 $84,259 $172,244 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $1,143,308 $564,803 $471,070 $1,035,873 Maintenance and Operations 632,799 361,812 211,540 573,352 Capital Outlay 37,800 26,764 0 26,764 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,813,907 (953,379 $682,610 $1,635,989 ! I 2 SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY FIELD OFFICER TIME With the City of Lynwood Total Available Service Hours (8 Officers) BREAKDOWN: Requests from public: 8 Impounding and Reports: 7 Leave time: 1,792 (vac., sick and personal) 16,640 Percentage of Total 52.448 44.178 10.768 Would be short 1,228 hours to fulfill the basic needed services. I i P- 2 PROPOSAL B • SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY SUMMARY OF REVENUES Revised Budget for FY 1991 -92, Excluding Lynwood for Second Half OPERATIONAL REVENUES Shelter Adopted First Second Total Cost 145,000 1991 -92 Half Half for Year Savings CITY CONTRIBUTIONS 4,000 4,000 Miscellaneous • 6,000 0 Bell Gardens (43,100) $135,579 $67,790 $62,566 $130,356 35,224) Downey (92,100) 289,717 144,859 - 133,699 278,558 ($11,160) Lynwood (62,700) 197,234 98,617 0 98,617 s0 Montebello (59,900) 188,426 94,213 86,955 181,168 ($7,258) Norwalk (95,100) 299,153 149,577 138,056 287,633 ($11,521) Paramount (49,600) 156,026 78,013 72,002 150,015 ($6,011) Pico Rivera (59,500) 187,168 93,584 86,374 179,958 ($7,210) Santa Fe Springs (15,500) 48,758 24,379 22,501 46,880 ($1,878) South El Monte (21,250) 66,846 33,425 30,850 64,275 ($2,571) Vernon 3,000 1,500 1,500 3,000 0 (Figures from California Population Research) Subtotal $1,571,907 $785,956 $634,503 $1,420,459 ($52,832) OPERATIONAL REVENUES Shelter $75,000 642,000 $45,000 $87,000 Veterinary 145,000 55,000 60,000 115,000 Interest 16,000 0 4,000 4,000 Miscellaneous • 6,000 0 6,000 6,000 Sale of Vehicles 0 Refunds on Insurances Subtotal, $242,000 $97,000 $115,000 $212,000 $1,813,907 $882,956 5749,503 $1,632,459 Carryover Funds $100,794 $100,794 Per Capita as originally adopted( $3.1457 Per Capita as adjustedi $3.0245 F C THEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORIO SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Revised Budget for FY 1991 -92, Excluding Lynwood for Second Half Revised Revised Adopted First Second Revised 1991 -92 Half Half Total Division Administrative Support ' Personnel Services $169,739 $84,870 $84,870 $169,740 Maintenance and Operations 368,693 241,192 93,170 334,362 Capital Outlay 3,100 900 0 900 Subtotal $541,532 $326,962 $178,040 $505,002 Field Operations Personnel Services $443,579 $222,508 $158,788 $381,296 Maintenance and Operations 65,370 26,945 22,945 49,890 Capital Outlay 24,500 21,474 0 21,474 Subtotal $533,449 $270,927 $181,733 $452,660 Shelter Operations i Personnel Services $393,479 $187,116 $160,827 $347,943 Maintenance and Operations 159,386 76,000 74,220 150,220 Capital Outlay 10,200 4,390 0 4,390 Subtotal $563,065 $267,506 $235,047 $502,553 I Veterinary Services Personnel Services $136,511 $70,309 $66,584 $136,894 Maintenance and Operations 39,350 17,675 17,675 35,350 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 i Subtotal $175,861 $87,984 $84,259 i $172,244 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Personnel Services $1,143,308 $564,803 $471,070 11,035,873 Maintenance and Operations 632,799 361,812 208,010 569,822 Capital Outlay 37,800 26,764 0 26,764 + TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,813,907 $953,379 $679,080 I 111,632,459 F I 0 0 SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY FIELD OFFICER TIME Without the City of Lynwood Total Available Service Hours: 16,640 (8 Officers) BREAKDOWN: Percentage of Total Requests from public: 7,609 48.578 Impounding and Reports: 6,456 41.218 Leave time: 1,601 10.228 (vac., sick and personal) Would leave 974 hours for Patrol, Observations and Special Activities. OMMUMMMMMMUPOMMMMMMMMMAUMMMMUMMMEMEMMMMEN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ / ■ ■ ■■ 1■■■■■■ ■ ■M■ ■■■■■■ O■SOME■ ■ ■1111■■ ■E■ ■ �O ■■ .. l_ ESE■_ �lEEE ■ ■ ... - ■■ M■SEI an ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I 1191111111111 i A ■■ ■t .. - Sir ■ ■ ■■I ■iw M ■M■ ■I IMr M■ ■M■ L. ■ ■E•_ ■■■ ■■■EI ■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I IE■ ■ ■ ■E■ ■■ ■E■■':; SE■ ■ ■S ■fl . a SS ■MESS ■S■ 4E■ ■fESES■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■L ■!■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■SL `7■ ■ ■f ■ ■ ■ ■■ �■ ■■■■■■■■ ■■ ON f. IMMMMM - 6 OS■■ ■ ■I . no ■� ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■I ■■■■ ■�! ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ MESMERISM MUMMMMMM ■E■EM _ ■� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.� ■ ■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ ■ E.r� � 111 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■`1 ■■■■■■■■ Rumusummu■ lammm"m ScegEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROOUTHORITY ALL BUDGET OPTIONS AND RELATED PERCENTAGE INCREASES Citizen /Officer Ratio 45,340/1 62,344/1 54,506/1 I -1 Adopted Proposal Proposal City FY 91 -92 A B Bell Gardens 25.78 88 21.08 Downey 18.58 88 14.OB Lynwood 30.48 88 _ Montebello 15.08 88 10.58 Norwalk 17.08 88 12.58 Paramount 25.08 88 19.88 Pico Rivera / 16.08 88 11.58 Santa Fe Springs 5.68 88 1.58 South E1 Monte 27.08 88 22.08 Citizen /Officer Ratio 45,340/1 62,344/1 54,506/1 I -1 0 0 EFFECTS OF REDUCING STAFFING LEVELS 1. 2. 3. 4. Personnel Reduction Summary Chart; Attachment fl. Reduction in field service hours. Current, 11 Officers: Officers are on duty from 6:00 a.m. to midnight. We accept routine requests from the public until 9:00 P.M. Proposed, 8 Officers: Officers would be on duty from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 P.M. We would accept routine requests from the public until 7:00 p.m. V rt k -1 )' `i.' - _\i- a. Would likely result in requests not being handled on the same day as taken, depending on the time of day the request is received. b. Would likely result in low priority requests (such as animals running at large) not being handled. Manpower deployment: 11 Officers; Attachment 2 8 Officers; Attachment 3 Response time. Charts below. Response time projections, assuming all current cities being serviced. Using an average day with 75 calls handled. All times indicated are in minutes. Present response times (11 Officers) Projected response times with 27.3% reduction in staff (Reduction of 3 Officers to a total of 8) Average 25.5 Animals in X9.8 61.1 82.7 Lowest Priority Custody Bites Strays Dead Average 20 55 47 48 65 Lowest 3 7 21 15 29 Highest 49 119 72 99 162 Projected response times with 27.3% reduction in staff (Reduction of 3 Officers to a total of 8) Average 25.5 70 X9.8 61.1 82.7 Lowest 3.8 8.9. 26.7 19.1 36.9 Highest 62.4 152.5 91.7 126 206.2 Priority calls are defined as sick or injured animals, Pit Bulls running loose and cruelty investigations. I -2.a 5. By reducing Re field Officers fro* 11 to 8, we loose approximately 5,600 hours of service annually. This would result in: a. Eliminating most patrol time (currently 2,950 hours). b. It would also impact Officers' ability to follow -up on animals observed running loose (currently 1,250 hours). C. Less time available for routine enforcement of requests from ' the general public. 6. By reducing field Sergeants from 2 to I routine assignments would be maintained by shifting some functions to the Administrative Staff. Extracurricular activities such as school presentations (presently offered to all elementary schools in our jurisdiction) and pet therapy programs at convalescent hospitals would have to be phased out. Because Sergeants are responsible for filing cases with the Courts on nuisance complaints, cruelty charges, etc., we would ensure that this became the priority. 7. The reduction of clerical staff by 338 will result in the public waiting longer for both counter assistance and requests coming via telephones. However, it would not affect the total number of requests coming through the Agency. 8. The reduction in Shelter staff (Kennel Attendants) by 28% would result in increased workload on the remainder, but will not impact the day -to -day care of the kennels or animals being housed. What will be affected are non - routine functions such as shelter upkeep, i.e., attention to windows, offices, bathrooms, minor repairs, grounds maintenance, etc. I -2 . b 11/13/91 M26 A FuWc A 9^uy Dedicated to OuaRty Animal Care b Control November 13, 1991 fir, Michael Heriot City of Lynwood 11330 Sullie Ad. Lynwood, California 9o262 Dear Michaels a U Enclosed you will find my projections for Fisoa1 Years 1992 -93 , and 1993 -91 oontributiona given the following sea mp�ionse 10 There would be so changes in the f 9 populat figures. 2. There would be no increase to revenues generated by Shelter Activities. 3. There would be no change In staffing. •. All secvlCS levels remain constant. An you can see, Lynwoodls contribution Iij, at 966� for Fiscal Year 1992 -93, The reason is that we had to revert !back to the per capita method of contributions. In Fiscal Yeas 1993 -94 all Increases ace across- the - board. should there beI any changes due to discrepancies in the recent census figures to will make the aPPropriate adjustments. 1 It is our intention the to generate additional Shaker revenues in base* coming year which Could further decrease +the contribution While theme are unverified that they will be held to, moon a$ possible. Sincerely, Dan Morr son, �Y� Sxeoutive Director DMldjw 0777 ksacr krcct 713 SM « 69Sy:C962 projections, I feefl quite confident please let me know !your thoughts as ATTACHMENT D P.02 DAN MDRRISON fxwAve Drreaar Sftvin TxT 1Wnglr Ptoa.era . LYrra'O*d . Od G&dlrra MnrNeperp Swua Fe • ParrIr101J1t VFrrlOrl Shah El MOrue City • 9 11.13.91 1ee21 a Bell Gardens Downey Lynwood Montebello Norwalk Paramount Pico Rivera Santa Pe Springs South 81 Monte SOUTHEAST 7REA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHO I ITY Projections for Fiscal Years 1992 -93 an 1993 -94 FY Percent I FY 92 -93 Increase 93 -94 1 $123,056 5.61 262,956 -0.41 179,015 9.61 171,021 -3.41 271,521 -1.71 141,614 -4881 169,879 -2.51 44,255 -8.3% 60,672 6.71 $1,423,989 $129,208 276,104 187,966 179,572 285,097 148,694 278,373 46,467 63,705 $1,495,186 P.03 Percent Increase stool 5.001 5.001 5.009 stool 5.001 5.001 5.001 5.001 0 0 AGREEMENT AN CONT40r BER CITY OF LYNWOOD THIS AGREEMENT# dated for purpose of reference only, January 1, 1992, is made by and between the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, hereinafter referred to as "County ", and the CITY OF LYNWOOD, hereinafter referred to as "City ". RECITALS (a) The City is desirous of contracting with the County for the performance of the hereinafter described animal control service within its boundaries by the County of Los Angeles through the Director of Animal Care and Control. (b) The County of Los Angeles is agreeable to rendering such services on the terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth. (c) Such contracts are authorized and provided for by the provisions of Section 56 1/2 of the Charter of the County of Los Angeles and Sections 51300 et seq. of the Government Code. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS1 1. The County agrees, through the Director of Animal Care and Control of the County of Los Angeles, to provide animal control services within the corporate limits of City to the extent and in the manner hereinafter set forth. ,k Such services shall only encompass duties and functions of the type coming within the jurisdiction of the customarily rendered by the Department of Animal Care and Control of the County of Los Angeles under the Charter of said County and statutes of the State. ATTACHMENT E 0 0 -2- To prepare for the basic level of service be provided by County, it is agreed that the City will pay the County a one -time start -up cost in a sum not to exceed $25,000. The level of service shall be that same basic level of service ' that is and shall hereafter during the term of this agreement be provided for unincorporated areas of the County of Los Angeles by said Director of Animal Care and Control. The rendition of such services, the standard of performance and other matters incidental to the performance of such services, and the control of personnel so employed shall remain in the County. In event of dispute between the parties as to the extent of'the duties and functions to be rendered hereunder or the level and manner of performance of such service, the determination thereof made by the Director of Animal Care and Control of the County shall be final and conclusive as between the parties hereto. Such service shall include the enforcement of State statutes and such municipal animal control ordinances as the City may adopt, as hereinafter provided for. 2. To facilitate the performance of said functions, it is hereby agreed that the County shall have full cooperation and assistance from the City, its officers, agents and employees. 3. For the purpose of performing said functions, County shall furnish and supply all labor, supervision, equipment and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service to be rendered hereunder. 1 0 0 -3- Notwithstanding anything hereinbefore contained, it is agreed that in all instances wherein special supplies, stationery, notices, forms and the like must be issued in the name of said City, the same shall be supplied by said City at its own cost and expense. 4. All persons employed in the performance of such services and functions for said City shall be County employees and no City employee as such shall be taken over by said County, and no person employed hereunder shall have any City pension, civil service, or any status or right. For the purpose of performing such services and functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof where necessary, every County officer and employee engaged in the performance of any service hereunder shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of said City while performing services for said City, which services are within the scope of this agreement and are purely municipal functions. 5. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of any salaries, wages or other compensation to any County personnel performing services hereunder for said County or any liability other than that provided for in this agreement. Except as herein otherwise specified, the City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity ,to any County employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment. 6. The Assumption of Liability Agreement executed by the parties to this agreeement is hereby made a part of and 0 0 -a- incorporated into this agreement as if set out in full herein unless said Assumption of Liability Agreement is expressly superseded by a concurrently or subsequently executed agreement entered into between the parties hereto, which concurrently or subsequently executed agreement is hereby made a part of and incorporated into this agreement as if set out in full herein. 7. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein contained, this contract shall be sooner terminated at any time that City fails to enact and to maintain in full force and effect, including the amount of fees provided, an ordinance identical with the provision of Division i Title 10 of the Los Angeles County Code. This contract shall also be sooner terminated if City does not enact amendments to said ordinance adopted by the Board of supervisors within 120 days after request to do so by County. The County Director of Animal Care and Control, acting on behalf of the County, may use discretion and need not request City to adopt amendments which do not apply to City. a. For and in consideration of animal control services by County, City agrees that it shall pay the full cost to the County for providing such services at rates determined by the County of Los Angeles Auditor - Controller. City further agrees that County may keep and retain any and all license fees provided for by said Municipal Animal Control Ordinance an4 collected by the County pursuant hereto as an offset against City's obligation to pay the full cost of animal control services. 0 0 -5- The County agrees, through the Department of Animal Care and Control to provide, on or before April 15 of each year, an estimate of the total costs and revenue for all animal control services to be provided to the City for the fiscal year then in progress. It is agreed that in connection therewith, the County shall have all the powers of the City and shall receive all cooperation possible therefrom to enable efficient enforcement of such ordinance and to effectuate collections called for thereunder. 9. This contract shall become effective on January I 1992 and shall run for period ending June 30, 1997 and, at the option of the city Council of the City, with the consent of the Board of Supervisors of County, shall be renewable thereafter for an additional period not to exceed five (5) years. In event the City desires to renew this agreement for said five -year period, the City Council shall not later than May 10, 1997, notify the Board of Supervisors of County that it wishes to renew the same, whereupon the Board of Supervisors, not later than May 31, 1997, shall notify the City Council in writing of its willingness to accept such renewal. Otherwise, such agreement shall finally terminate at the end of the aforedescribed period. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph hereinabove set forth, the County may terminate this agreement at any time by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. The City may terminate this agreement at any time by giving (30) days prior written notice to the County. to -6- 0 10. City agrees that whenever animals from within the boundaries of the City are delivered to animal shelters operated by County, the City shall pay for the services and shelter of said animals at the following rates: Services Rates Impounding of a relinquished dog or cat. Impounding a stray dog or cat. Holding a dog or cat wearing a license or identification. (City shall pay for the fore- going shelter and treatment for a period not to exceed seven days.) $ 7.00 per day plus all veteri- narian costs for treating these animals while at the County shelter Holding an abandoned dog or cat. Holding a dog or cat for observation. Holding a sick or injured dog or cat in isolation. Holding dogs, cats, poultry, livestock that are ordered impounded for court, i.e., fighting dogs, guard dogs, etc. $ 10.82 per day plus all veterin- arian costs for treating these animals while at the County shelter For each dead animal brought into $ 4.00 per animal the centers for disposal ,c For each dead livestock, i.e. $ 150.00 per animal horse, cow, etc., brought into the centers for disposal City shall pay for the shelter and treatment of all live animals, reptiles, and fowl from within the boundaries of the City 0 0 -l- and are delivered to animal shelters operated by the County and the cost of such shelter and treatment of such animal shall be as determined by the County Auditor - Controller. 11. The foregoing rates shall be adjusted by the County Auditor - Controller annually, effective July 1st of each year commencing July 1, 1991, to reflect the cost of such service in accordance with such rates as determined by the County Auditor - Controller and as approved by the Board of Supervisors of County. All services rendered hereunder are subject to the limitation of the provisions of Section 23008 of the Government Code, and, in accordance therewith, before any services are rendered pursuant hereto, an amount equal to the cost, or an amount ten percent in excess of the estimated cost, shall be reserved by the City from its funds to ensure payment to the County for work, services or materials provided hereunder. 12. For shelter services rendered, the County shall submit an itemized invoice to said City within 10 days after the close of each calendar month which includes all such shelter services performed during the preceding month. For field services rendered, the County shall submit annually an itemized invoice to said City on or before July loth, for such services provided during the preceding 12 months of July through June. Said City shall pay County therefore within thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice. if such payments provided above and in Section 8 of this agreement are not delivered to the County within thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice, the county is entitled to recover interest thereon. Said interest shall be at the rate of seven (7) 0 0 -8- percent per annum or any portion thereof calculated from the last day of the month in which the services were performed. However, the interest herein provided may be waived, whenever the Director of Animal Care and Control finds late payment excusable by reason of extenuating circumstances. 13. Notwithstanding the provisions in Government Code Section 907, if such payments are not delivered to the County office which is described on said invoice within thirty (30) days after date of the invoice, the County may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of the City on deposit with the County without giving further notice to City of County's intention to do so. all invoices and report in writing 14. The City will review of any discrepancies to the Director of Animal Care and Control within ten (10) business days. The County shall review the disputed charges and send a written explanation detailing the basis for the charges within ten (10) business days of the receipt of the City's written report. If the City does not receive from the County a written explanation within the ten (10) business day period, it shall be implied that the County is not disputing the charges. keep separate records for each City 15. The County agrees to in such form and manner as the County auditor- Controller of the County of Los Angeles shall specify. Such records shall be open for examination by said city during all business hours. 16. The county agrees to maintain its kennel and animal shelter in a humane manner and keep said premises in a sanitary condition at all times and that all services furnished by it -9- hereunder shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of California and that it will give the prescribed notices and use humane methods of care and destruction of any animal coming under • its jurisdiction. 7 0 0 -10- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Lynwood, by order of its City Council, causes this agreement to be signed by its mayor and attested by its clerk and the County of Los Angeles, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of the said Board and the seal of said Board to be affixed thereto and attested by the Clerk of said Board - CITY OF LYNWOOD By Mayor CouNTY OF LOS ANGELES By Chairman Board of Supervisors ATTEST: city Clerk ATTEST: C l lerk of the T Board of supervisors officer supervisors By Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: DEWITT W- CLINTON, County Counsel. By c Deputy DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Faustin Gonzales, Assistant City Manager BY: Lorry Torres, Administrative Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: AB 939 - Resolution Urging the State of California ,to Amend AB 939 PURPOSE To have City Council adopt a resolution urging the decisionmakers of the State of California to amend AB 939 in consideration of the fiscal constraints placed on local governments by streamlining several requirements to make the program more flexible and workable for local jurisdictions. o AB 939, the 1989 California Integrated Waste Management Act imposes responsibilities on local governments to develop and implement integrated waste management programs. o The State mandates that by January 1, 1995, cities and counties must divert 25% of solid waste from landfills through source reduction, recycling and composting and 508 by January 1, 2000. o As the Act stands now, Article 3 Section 41821, following the California Integrated Waste Management Board's approval of the City's SRR and HHW Elements, each year the city is required to submit a report to the board in its progress in reducing solid waste which includes information on increases or decreases in solid waste generated. o The AB 939 Plan must also include an education and public information component, series of program monitoring and evaluation, and development of markets for recycled materials. ANALYSIS The following proposed amendments to AB 939 are designed to alleviate cumbersome and costly planning and study requirements and to focus limited City resources on implementation efforts. Current AB 939 Requirement: Under AB 939 each city or county is required to submit a report to the board which includes a waste characterization study and detailed reports on monitoring and evaluation of each program in order to monitor the city's progress. Proposed Amendment: Amend AB 939 to allow for preparation of waste characterization studies, and preparation and submittal of detailed reports on monitoring and evaluation of each source reduction and recycling program only in 1995 and the year 2000. The fiscal impact of producing an SRRE and HHWE for the preparation of the initial SRRE and HHWE amounts to $18,000 in consultant fees and add an additional $10,000- $15,000 in staff's time. The Los Angeles County Southeast Area Integrated Waste Management Group is expected to have spent an alarming $538,000 for the initial preparation of AGINA ITEM 2 !- the SRRE and HHWE. Although some of the cost have been offset by t &County Sanitation Distri, future funding may not be avdTlable in subsequent years. If the requirement remains the cities would have to channel their already limited resources to cover the cost. Current AB 939 Requirement: Under AB 939 each city is required to prepare an education and public information component describing how the city will increase public awareness of, and participation in, recycling, source reduction, and composting programs, and similar programs for their HHWE. Proposed Amendment: Amend AB 939 to shift the primary responsibility for public education and information programs to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Content and substance of educational literatures and public promotions are similar from one jurisdiction to another. Cities should have the option of conducting such programs locally only to to supplement the statewide educational campaign in order to meet unique local needs. The City can save about $52,000 annually and $52,000 in capital costs if the proposed amendment is passed. Current AB 939 Requirement: Under AB 939 each city or county must develop markets for the recycled materials diverted from the waste stream. Proposed Amendment: Amend AB 939 to relieve each city or county from the requirement of developing markets for recycled materials. This responsibility is best addressed Individual city does not generate materials to develop a stable mar basis. The State has the ability and markets and to create new opportunity sector for recycled products. RECOMMENDATION at the state level. sufficient recycled tet on an individual the resources to find in the private To have City Council adopt a resolution I urging the decisionmakers of the State of California to amend AB 939 as follows: 1. Allow for the preparation of waste characterization studies only in 1995 and the year 2000 rather than every year. 2. Eliminate the requirement of preparation and submittal of detailed reports on monitoring and evaluation of each source reduction and recycling program. Instead, reports should be submitted only in 1995 and the year 2000. 3. Relieve each city and the counties from the requirement of developing markets for recyclable material and delegate that function to the State. 4. Shift the primary responsibility for public education and information programs to the State rather than cities and counties. ab93913 • RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD URGING THAT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO SIMPLIFY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AB 939 WHEREAS, there exists a solid waste crisis in the State of California; and WHEREAS, and State of California has responded to the crisis by the adoption of Assembly Bill 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989; and WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has taken steps to support the AB 939 mandates by becoming a part of the Southeast Area Integrated Waste Management Group for the purpose of preparing the initial Solid Waste Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE); WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood is concerned that certain aspects of the act and the rules for its implementation are unnecessarily complicated and cumbersome; and WHEREAS, such procedures divert scarce City resources from the main task of reducing the waste stream; and WHEREAS, such procedures also require. a major effort by State personnel in checking compliance which diverts State's resources away from providing assistance to local government. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Governor, the Legislature and the Integrated Waste Management Board of the State of California are urged to take necessary steps to remove unnecessary and wasteful procedures from the implementation of AB 939. SECTION 2: That the City Council authorizes the City Clerk to mail a certified copy of this resolution to the City Council of each city in Los Angles And Orange Counties; to the Governor and the Integrated Waste Management Board of the State of California and the representatives of the City of Lynwood in the California State Legislature. SECTION 3: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. day of LOUIS HEINE, MAYOR City of Lynwood ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney misc /ab93914 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1991 ty Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Michael Heriot City Manager WARRANT DATE 12 -03 -91 PREPAIDS AND VOIDS WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDOR* VENDOR NAME 34516 - 38 79 99999 35594 2850 00 1229 35595 92290 50 1235 35596 25 95 99999 35597 12032 87 1261 35598 2761 20 1263 35599 2140 00 99999 35600 3656.00 12 -03 -91 1270 35601 2955 00 99999 35602 820 18 11 35603 1625 16 1279 35604 107 17 97 35605 281 79 99999 35606 379 95 69 35607 335 57 291 35608 368 75 99999 35609 2745 00 1229 35610 35 00 99999 35611 2705 00 1270 35612 145 27 201 35613 3701 10 570 35614 2412 52 99999 35615 1076 64 99999 35616 2960 80 99999 35617 47951 89 986 35618 172 06 106 35619 1746 BI 99999 35620 18893 50 748 35621 12930 00 221 35622 300 00 889 35623 300 00 120 35624 300 00 1091 35625 300 00 606 35626 300 00 291 35627 1491 50 120 35628 22245 38 99999 C I I Y of W A R R A N I RAFAEL RIOS PACIFIC COMPUTER SYSTEMS NEKO CORPORATION TARGET AUDIO DESIGN GROUP BELAIRE -WEST LANDSCAPE E.R PROFESSIONAL WELDING ATLAS ASPHALT ALI ZAKERI BANKCARD CENTER SEAFIRST BANK HOME DEPOT STAPLES DISCOUNT EQUIPMENT CO. EVELYN M WELLS L.A COUNTY TREASURER k T PACIFIC COMPUTER SYSTEMS CALIF PARK d RECREATION ATLAS ASPHALT PACIFIC BELL CENTRAL AND WEST BASIN CADTRONICS CENTRAL BASIN MUNICIPAL BINARY COMPUTER P E. R S. GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. ADVANCE TECHOLOGY COPY BY BARBOSA• MORILLO & BARNES RAPID PUBLISHING LOUIS HEINE ROBERT HENNING ARMANDO REA PAUL H. RICHARDS EVELYN M. WELLS ROBERT HENNING PEYTON CRAMER FORD A% STEM L Y N W D 0 D R E G I S T E R DESCRIPTION CLD WTR ACCT MICRO COMPUTER SYSTEM COMM CENTER PROJ MINI BLINDS SOUND SYSTF11 CONTRACTUAL SVCS CONTRACTUAL SVCS PROFESSIONAL SVCS REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT BANKCARD CHRGS LEASE PMT -ICLFA LOAN ANSWERING MACHINE OPERATING SUPPLIES FILE CABINETS MILEAGE /PER DIEM FEE - LICENSE HAZARD WASTE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEE -PARK 6 REC PAVING TELEPHONE SVCS MEMBER /ASSESSMENT FEE COMPUTER EQUIP WATER SAMPLING 4 -6/91 COMPUTER EQUIP RETIREMENT P E. 11/9 TELEPHONE SVCS COPIER SVCS AGRMT LEGAL SERVICES PUBLICATION MONTHLY STIPEND 11/91 MONTHLY STIPEND 11/91 MONTHLY STIPEND 11/91 MONTHLY STIPEND 11/91 MONTHLY STIPEND 11/91 TRAVEL /MTG REIMS 2 FORD RANGER 1992 PAGE 1 INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 12 -03 -91 —38.79 12 -03 -91 2850.00 12 -03 -91 92290.50 12 -03 -91 25.95 12 -03 -91 12032.87 12 -03 -91 2761 20 12 -03 -91 2140.00 12 -03 -91 3656.00 12 -03 -91 2955.00 12 -03 -91 820 18 12 -03 -91 1625.16 12 -03 -91 107 17 12 -03 -91 281 79 12 -03 -91 379 95 12 -03 -91 333.57 12 -03 -91 368.73 12 -03 -91 2745.00 12 -03 -91 35 00 12 -03 -91 2705.00 12-03 -91 145 27 12 -03 -91 3701 10 12 -03 -91 2412.52 12 -03 -91 1076.64 12 -03 -91 2960.80 12 -03 -91 47951 89 12 -03 -91 172.06 12 -03 -91 1746.81 12 -03 -91 18893.50 12 -03 -91 12930.00 12 -03 -91 300.00 12 -03 -91 300.00 12 -03 -91 300.00 12 -03 -91 300.00 12 -03 -91 300.00 12 -03 -91 1491 50 12 -03 -91 22245.38 TOTAL PREPAYS 245342.56 TOTAL VOIDS: —38.79 TOTAL. 245303. 77 k �N C I T Y of L Y N W O O D WARRANT DATE 12 -03 -91 W A R R A N 1 R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDOR* VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 35629 120 00 99999 A & L MARTIN ELECTRIC REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 12 -03 -91 120.00 35630 343 03 99999 AA EQUIPMENT LAWN MOWER PARTS 12 -03 -91 343.03 35631 892 88 99999 ACADEMY POOL INSTALL /PUMP- FOUNTAIN 12 -03 -91 892.88 35632 990 00 99999 ACADEMY POOL & SPA POOL MAINT 8/91110 -11/91 12 -03 -91 990.00 35633 1383 71 2 ACE LUMBER & SUPPLY BUILDING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 1383.71 35634 217 00 99999 ADVANCE DATA CARE INC COMPUTER MAINT KIT 12 -03 -91 217 00 35635 1570 00 1085 THE ALPHA GROUP SECURITY SVCS 10/91 12 -03 -91 1570.00 35636 877 50 10 API ALARM SYSTEM ALARM SVCS 10 -12/91 12 -03 -91 877 50 35637 25 00 919 MARGARET ARAUJO HCDA BOARD MTO 11/6 12 -03 -91 25.00 • 35638 25 96 13 ARROWHEAD DRINKING WATER BOTTLED WATER 10/91 12 -03 -91 25.96 35639 895 76 1210 AUTO PARTS CLUB AUTO PARTS 12 -03 -91 895 76 35640 72 00 1192 GONZALO BANUELOS TUTORIAL SVCS 11/13 12 -03-91 72.00 35641 3686.60 748 BARBOSA, MORILLO & BARNES LEGAL SVCS 12-03 -91 3686.60 35642 25 00 20 YOLANDA BAYS COMM MTO 11/13 12 -03-91 25.00 35643 25 00 1064 PATRICE BELL PERSONNEL BRD 11/21 12 -03 -91 25.00 ' 35644 1698 40 976 BERLIN TIRE CENTERS TIRES 12 -03 -91 1698.40 35645 5552 00 99999 BILL SILVERMAN CONSTRUCTION REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 12 -03 -91 5552.00 35646 380 02 25 BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS PATCH MIX 12 -03 -91 380.02 35647 1285 19 550 BROOKS PRODUCTS, INC OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03-91 1285.19 35648 116 49 212 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE PAYROLL GUIDE 12 -03 -91 118.49 35649 1018.82 1183 JIM BYRD TELEMETRY REPAIRS 12 -03 -91 1018.82 35650 293 95 99999 CALIF DEPOSITION REPORTERS PROF SVCS 12 -03 -91 293.95 35651 145 26 99999 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT OPERATING SUPPLIES 12-03 -91 145.26 35652 1342 50 99999 CASE SURVEYING CO. INSPECTION & RESEARCH 12 -03 -91 1342.50 35653 173087 00 47 CENTRAL & WESTERN BASIN GROUND WATER SVCS 9/30 12 -03 -91 173087 00 35654 65660 40 570 CENTRAL AND WEST BASIN IMPORTED WATER 10/91 12 -03 -91 65660.40 35655 590 13 965 CHARLES W. CARTER CO TRUCK PARTS 12 -03 -91 590.13 35656 2559 60 99999 CODED SYSTEMS CORPORATION CODE & ZONING BOOKS 12 -03 -91 2559 60 35657 675 00 99999 COLOR KING REPAIR & MAINT 12 -03 -91 675.00 35658 108 25 1240 COMMERICAL MOBILE SYSTEMS LEASE MOBILE UNIT 10/91 12 -03 -91 108.25 . 35659 673 00 99999 COMMERICAL FENCE CHAIN LINK FENCE 12 -03 -91 673.00 35660 54 00 1100 COMMUNICATION TRANSMITTING SVC DISPLAY PACER 12/91 12 -03 -91 54.00 35661 3225 00 1227 COMPTON COURT HOUSE COURT BLDG. FEE 12 -03 -91 3225.00 35662 374 66 59 COMPTON BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY BLUEPRINTS 12 -03 -91 374.66 35663 219 10 60 CONLIN BROS., INC BASKETBALLS 12 -03-91 219 10 35664 25 00 1036 VERNA CULP COMM MTO 11/13 12 -03 -91 25.00 35665 50413 50 1257 CUTLER & ASSOCIATES LONG BEACH BL PROJ 12 -03 -91 50413.50 35666 1623.08 836 DAPPER TIRE CO. TIRE SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 1623.08 35667 135 00 678 DATA PLUS COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM PHONE SYSTEM 12 -03 -91 135 00 35668 511 10 504 DATAQVICK INFORMATION NETWORK COMPUTER SVCS 7 -10/91 12 -03 -91 511 10 35669 47 93 787 DAVE'S TROPHIES DESK PLATES 12-03 -91 47 93 35670 227 79 1164 DISCOUNT RADIATOR SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT 12 -03 -91 227 79 35671 25 00 1125 ELIZABETH DIXON PLANNING MTG 11/12 12 -03 -91 25.00 35672 25 00 73 DONALD DOVE PLANNING MTG I1 /12 12 -03 -91 25 00 35673 1660 03 1112 F R EARL EQUIP CO. AUTO PARTS 12 -03 -91 1660 03 35674 368.62 927 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 368.62 35675 25 00 86 BETTE ESPESETH COMM MTG 11/13 12 -03 -91 25.00 35676 71 56 907 EXPRESS MESSENGER MESSENGER SVCS 12 -03 -91 71 56 35677 538 16 99999 FASSARI & ASSOCIATES SHORTHAND REPORT 12 -03 -91 538.16 C I T Y of L Y N W O 0 D WARRANT DATE 12 -03 -91 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 WARRANT* AMOUNT VENDOR* VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 35678 25 00 91 ANN A. FIELDS COMM MTO 11/13 12 -03 -91 25.00 35679 260 27 99999 FLORES, JAMIE C DEFERRED COMP REIMS 12 -03 -91 260.27 35680 338.24 1247 FLOWERS ON YOUR DAY FLORAL ARRANGEMENT 12 -03 -91 338.24 356B1 451 92 1273 FLOWERS ON YOUR DAY FLORAL ARRANGEMENT 12 -03 -91 451 92 35682 25 00 26 CONSTANCE FRANKLIN HCDA BOARD MTG 11/6 12 -03 -91 25.00 35683 700 00 99999 FRED ROTH TREE CARE CONSULTING SVCS 12 -03 -91 700.00 35684 65 92 882 GENE'S SPORTING GOODS JR FOOTBALLS 12 -03 -91 65.92 35685 60 95 99999 GENERAL BINDING CORP OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 60.95 35686 280 00 99999 GERALD WALLACE PER DIEM - 0. WALLACE 12 -03 -91 280.00 • 35687 35688 25 384 00 72 109 1221 NANCY GILPEN GOLDEN STATE PAINT PERSONNEL BRD 11121 PAINT SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 12-03 -91 25.00 384.72 35689 414 49 99999 GORDON'S INCORPORATED OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 414 49 35690 693.23 1272 GRAINGER OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 693.23 35691 254 51 99999 GRAINGERS OPERAT SVPPL. -CR MEMO 12 -03 -91 254 51 35692 25 00 652 LORNA HAWKINS COMM MTO 11/13 12 -03 -91 25.00 35693 25 00 956 JOHN K. HAYNES PLANNING MTG 11/12 12 -03 -91 25.00 35694 900 00 1280 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC SALES TAX AGRMT 12 -03 -91 900.00 33695 726.24 99999 HYDRO -SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 726.24 35696 75 00 128 INDEPENDENT CITIES ASSN. GENERAL MEMBER MTG 12 -03 -91 75.00 35697 1500 00 1186 J C. HYDRO BLASTING BUS STOP CLNG 9 -10/91 12 -03 -91 1500.00 35698 21 65 133 JOBS AVAILABLE SUBSCRIPT -HUM RES 12 -03 -91 21 65 ' 35699 11600 79 973 JOE'S SWEEPING CO. STREET SWEEPING SVS 11/91 12 -03 -91 11600.79 35700 20 44 136 JONES LUMBER BUILDING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 20.44 35701 68.00 1236 RONDA KELLY TUTORIAL SVCS 11/13 12 -03 -91 68.00 35702 884 92 140 KEYSTONE FORD AUTO PARTS 12 -03 -91 884.92 35703 92.40 99999 KEYSTONE RENT A KAR RENTAL VAN 11/9 12 -03 -91 92.40 35704 65 75 99999 L & B WHEEL ALIGNMENT WHEEL ALIGNMENT 12 -03 -91 65.75 35705 806 89 1268 L.A. COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEGAL SVCS 6 -9/91 12 -03 -91 806.89 35706 1665 57 1241 LASALLE BANK OF LISLE LEASE PMT 12/91 12 -03 -91 1665.57 35707 25 00 921 CLAUDE LAW HCDA BOARD MTG 11/6 12 -03 -91 25.00 35708 15300 00 1008 LEA ASSOCIATES, INC LONG BEACH BLVD PROJ 12 -03 -91 15300.00 35709 25 00 1052 ERRICK LEE PLANNING MTO 11112 12 -03 -91 25.00 35710 25 00 1062 GEORGE LEWIS PERSONNEL BRD 11/21 12 -03 -91 25.00 35711 25 00 153 ARNOLD LITKE PERSONNEL BRD 11/21 12 -03 -91 25.00 35712 25 00 154 DAVID LITSINGER COMM MTO 11/13 12 -03 -91 25.00 35713 8447 13 1231 LOCKMAN & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SVCS 6 -8/91 12 -03 -91 8447 13 35714 300 00 1238 LONG BEACH UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 12 -03 -91 300.00 35715 210 40 156 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPT /WELLS&CT MOR 12 -03 -91 210 40 35716 71 94 '157 LOS ANGELES COUNTY ASSESSOR MAPS & POSTAGE FEE 10/91 12 -03 -91 71 94 35717 391091 19 161 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LAW REUXI ETr 10/1 -31 12- 03-91 391091 19 35718 30 39 495 L.A COUNTY OF PUBLIC WORKS BLUEPRINTS 12 -03 -91 30.39 35719 9 00 499 LOS ANGELES COUNTY RELEASE LIEN 12 -03 -91 9 00 35720 45 12 928 LOS ANGELES TIMES SVBSCRIPT-HERIOT 12 -03 -91 45 12 35721 1742.89 164 LYNGATE PRINTING CO. PROMOTIONAL SVCS 12 -03 -91 1742.89 35722 2500 00 168 LYNWOOD PRESS WAVE PROMOTIONAL ADS 10/91 12 -03 -91 2500 00 35723 7909 57 172 CITY OF LYNWOOD -HOME BANK WORKERS' COMP REIMS 12 -03 -91 7909 57 35724 3130 00 99999 LYNWOOD RENTAL CENTER REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 12 -03 -91 3130.00 35725 43 26 99999 LYNWOOD SPORTS ASSOC REIMS -KODAK CAMERA 12 -03 -91 43.26 35726 5875 00 99999 MANSOORI_AN, HAITOOK REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 12 -03 -91 5875.00 r \_J WARRANT DATE 12 -03 -91 WARRANT* AMOUNT VENDOR* VENDOR NAME 35727 676 70 637 33728 2625 00 99999 35729 25 00 1039 35730 80 00 328 33731 25 00 1072 35732 66 10 327 35733 100 00 99999 35734 4990 00 1265 33735 1000 00 99999 35736 252 21 1266 35737 494 01 187 33738 860 00 502 33739 23 00 949 35740 999 13 1145 33741 171 59 193 35742 25 00 197 35743 75 38 199 33744 1970 64 769 35745 67 26 99999 35746 400 00 1028 33747 25 00 1040 33748 739 04 201 35749 546 66 202 33750 579 50 207 35751 928 71 208 35752 40 00 185 33753 234 33 703 35754 103 77 211 35755 1248 00 213 35756 62 52 216 35757 25 00 218 35758 700 00 219 35759 1638.88 1084 35760 5000 02 1274 35761 1000 00 99999 35762 1460 58 221 35763 828.00 99999 35764 300 00 99999 35765 113.20 225 35766. 143.50 1244 35767 70 01 99999 33768 543 27 99999 35769 178.61 1230 35770 308.74 232 33771 199 02 745 33772 170 96 1061 35773 57 27 241 35774 2769 86 926 35775 500 00 1220 I T Y of L Y N W O O A R R A N 7 R E G I S T MARK IV CHARTER LINES MARTIN LADDER SERVICE DELLA MAZZIOTTI MC JIMSEY EXTERMINATING CARLTON MC MILLER MC DONALD'S EQUIPMENT MIDWAY UPHOLSTERING SHOP MIRAMONTES CONST MIRAMONTES CONSTRUCTION MOBILE COMM MOBILE COMMUNICATION SER MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, INC JAMAL MUSHIN NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY NCR CORPORATION BARBARA NEWTON NORMED NORWALK POWER EQUIPMENT CO NOVADYNE MARVETTA O'DELL ETHEL PACHECO PACIFIC BELL PAGEANTRY AWARDS' PETTY CASH PETTY CASH - CHECKING PHOENIX DISTRIBUTORS POSTAL INSTANT PRESS PRECISION AUTOMOTIVE PRESS TELEGRAM PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY ROY PRYOR QUALITY FENCE CO., INC QUALITY AUTO & TRUCK PARTS RABBIT REPRODUCTION RANGER DIE CASTING RAPID PUBLISHING REEF INDUSTRIES REM ENGINEERING RENTERIA AUTO PARTS MAYA RHODES RONSIN PHOTOCOPY INC RONSIN PHOTOCOPY INC S & J SUPPLY CO. SAFETY -KLEEN CORPORATION SAFEWAY SIGN CO. SECRETARY COFFEE SERVICE, INC SHELL OIL COMPANY SHERWIN- WILLIAMS CO SIMPSON & SIMPSON DESCRIPTION TRANSPORTATION SVCS INSTALL X -MAS DECORATION COMM MTO 11/13 PEST CONTROL PLANNING MTO 11/12 OPERATING SUPPLIES RE- UPHOLSTERY SVCS LONG BEACH BLVD PROJ REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT PAGER SVCS REPAIR & MAINT ACCTO ASSIST 10/91 PLANNING MTO 11/12 OPERATING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES COMM MTO 11/13 MEDICAL SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES PRINTER RIBBON SECRETARIAL SVCS 11/8 COMM MTO 11/13 TELEPHONE SVCS OPERATING SUPPLIES REPLENISHMENT REPLENISHMENT OPERATING SUPPLIES PRINTING SVCS AUTO PARTS ADVERTISEMENT MOPS PLANNING MTO 11/12 REPAIR TENNIS COURT AUTO PARTS LEGAL CASE COPIES REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT ADVERTISEMENT OPERATING SUPPLIES REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT AUTO PARTS TUTORIAL SVCS 11/13 LEGAL CASE COPIES LEGAL CASE COPIES OPERATING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNS COFFEE SVCS GASOLINE CHRGS OPERATING SUPPLIES ACCTG ASSIST 10/91 INV DATE 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12-03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12-03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12-03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 PAGE 4 INVOICE AMOUNT 676.70 2623.00 25.00 80.00 25.00 66.10 100.00 4990.00 1000.00 252.21 494.01 860.00 25.00 999 13 171 59 25. 00 75.58 1970.84 67 26 400.00 25.00 739 04 546. 66 579 50 928. 71 40.00 234.33 103.77 1248.00 62.52 25.00 700.00 1638.88 5000.02 1000.00 1460 58 829.00 300.00 113.20 143.50 70.01 543.27 170.61 308.74 199 02 170.96 57 27 2769 86 500 00 WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDORS VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT 35776 130 C I T Y of L Y N W O 0 D 130 WARRANT DATE 12 -03 -91 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 5 WARRANT# AMOUNT VENDORS VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT t162707 27 1162707 27 PREPAID 35594 -35628 SPOILED VOIDS 34516 35776 130 71 99999 SINCLA19 PAINT PAINT SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 130 71 35777 61 09 244 SMART & FINAL IRIS CO OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 61 09 35778 59374 43 246 SO CALIF EDISON COMPANY LICHT & POWER 12 -03 -91 59374.43 35779 3278.16 247 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY GAS SERVICES 12 -03 -91 3278.16 35780 150 00 99999 SO. COAST AIR QUALITY ANNUAL STORAGE FEE 12 -03 -91 150 00 35781 341 05 249 SOUTH GATE WHOLESALE ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 341 05 35782 460 06 99999 SOUTHWEST CATERING CATERING SVCS 12 -03-91 460.06 35783 35784 86.58 BI 00 99999 42 STAPLES STATE OF CA -DEPT OF JUSTICE COMPUTER TABLE FINGERPRINT APPS 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 86.58 at 00 35785 101 56 99999 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STORAGE TANK FEE 12 -03 -91 101 56 35786 241 50 99999 STRUCTURAL INDUSTRIES CERTIFICATE FRAME 12 -03 -91 241 50 35787 25 00 954 KENT SWIFT PERSONNEL BRD 11/21 12 -03 -91 25.00 35788 592 67 1214 TAJ OFFICE SUPPLY OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 592.67 35789 66 69 99999 TAM'S OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 66.69 35790 36 61 99999 THE SUPPLIERS PAINT SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 36.61 ' 35791 75 00 99999 THE TWENTY FIVE DOLLAR ROOTER REPAIR GARBAGE DISPOSAL 12 -03 -91 75.00 35792 1749 00 99999 THOMAS, MCKINELY REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT 12 -03 -91 1749 00 35793 1080 00 267 TIMELY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP 12 -03 -91 1080.00 35794 345 37 1152 TURBO DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 12 -03 -91 345 37 35795 68 64 277 UNDERGND SERVICE ALERT POPULATION CHRGS 10/91 12 -03 -91 68.64 35796 419 65 1239 UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORMS 12 -03 -91 419 65 35797 420 70 99999 UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE UNIFORM SVCS 12 -03 -91 420.70 35798 19 00 867 UNITOG BUSINESS CLOTHING UNIFORMS 12 -03 -91 19 00 35799 900 00 99999 VICTOR JONES AND TOPLITZKY LIABILITY CLAIM 12 -03 -91 900.00 35800 80 60 99999 VIERK INDUSTRIES OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 80.60 35801 147 00 1245 LUIS VILLA TUTORIAL SVCS 11/13 12 -03 -91 147 00 35802 25 00 283 LUCILLE WALKER COMM MTO 11/13 12 -03 -91 25.00 35803 375 97 343 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 375.97 35804 35805 17 16366.33 61 292 413 WEST PUBLISHING CO WESTERN WASTE INDUSTRIES PUBLICATION- HOOPER TRASH PICK -UP 10/91 12 -03 -91 12 -03 -91 17 16366.35 61 35806 1134 91 483 WESTERN PETROLEUM INC GASOLINE CHRGS 12 -03 -91 1134 91 35807 472.00 99999 WHITAKER CONCRETE CORP RUBBER TIRE LOADER 12 -03 -91 472.00 35808 283.37 99999 WILBURN'S OPERATING SUPPLIES 12 -03 -91 283.37 35809 2000 00 1254 EVANGELA L. WILLIAMS SCHOLARSHIP WINNER 12 -03 -91 2000.00 35810 2090 56 306 XEROX CORPORATION LEASE AGRMT 12 -03 -91 2090.56 35811 120 00 99999 YADOLLAH FARHADI MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 12 -03 -91 120.00 35812 2182 00 912 YAMADA COMPANY, INC AUTO PARTS 12 -03 -91 2182.00 35813 1326.00 307 YOUNG PEOPLE OF LYNWOOD ALLEY CLEAN -UP 10/31 12 -03 -91 1326.00 35814 40 00 99999 ZARAGOZA, RUBEN REFUND -CIT #158410 12 -03 -91 40 00 t162707 27 1162707 27 PREPAID 35594 -35628 SPOILED VOIDS 34516 ±it o f LYNWOOD City � Clidhttges 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (213) 6030220 DATE. Deowber 3, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and Qxmci tmembe•s FROM: k0rea L. fir, City Clez4 SUBJECT: FaLw (4) vacancies on the 03mmun Affairs Commission Four (4) terms on the Community Affairs Commission expire in December. Those terms expiring are: Lucille Walker A. Ann Fields Yolanda Bays David Litsinger Each commissioner has submitted a letter to be reconsidered for reappointment. Nominations are in order. - Appointment. A01" ITIX 23 1111. CI,. I� .. I I) ROBERT HENNING. MAYOR PAUL H. RICHARDS, II MAYOR PRO TEM MEMO to Lynwood City Council: SUBJECT: Membership, ComrLmity Affairs Corr:nissicn The undersigned, whose term on the Commlality Affairs Commission ter— minates at the end of this year, is w:tl "ng to se.ve another term, if the Council so desires. DAVID W. LITSINGER t I CE.iv CITY OF LYN1 "0CR CITY s I`JyI ,11 " Cit of LYNWOOD DG= ,-A City - MeefiAq C ffvige9 I`1 1 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 Council Members (213) 6030220 LOUIS J. HEINE ARMANDO REA EVELYN WELLS 13 November 1991 MEMO to Lynwood City Council: SUBJECT: Membership, ComrLmity Affairs Corr:nissicn The undersigned, whose term on the Commlality Affairs Commission ter— minates at the end of this year, is w:tl "ng to se.ve another term, if the Council so desires. DAVID W. LITSINGER t I CE.iv CITY OF LYN1 "0CR CITY s I`JyI ,11 " u November 14, 1991 Members of the Lynwood City Council, My term on the Community Affairs Commission expires this December. I wish to thank you for the opportunity of serving on the Commission and I'm willing to serve another term at the pleasure of the Council. Thank you, A. Ann Fields �� ' 11� ��-w— C� t�.,, Cv- vr� -mu„ —� � 1� 1 � cJ ��/ - -- ., r �� ._ r� TY YNIYCOD Cl i Y CLER;' \ S OFFICE .f 1 18191 , 01H1211121314, k �i f� L" / L � C-v C.C'�� ,c--u /3 /C /9/ k owner's Name Owner's address Comer's occupation Ac= - - - - caticn for Soecial_ ?e it / i J J i %; Phone No. ^ipe of ?emit Desired cuss iAr location where permit is to be used f 0/ /�/� /� f�[> %Lh t i� 3etween what sours will permit be used That area will be designated far this use (St. Ft.) what is the total ground floor area of structure Have you made application for this type of permit before? If so, where? �ee� Number of persons emp Z hereby certify that all statements made in this application are t_ - and complete, and that any misstatements of material facts wi11 cause a �orjeitnrs of fee and denial of ?ermit. Signature of agent (if any) Dare tGZMA l IM 11-177z- Dalton Property Management Services - 504 East Compton Boulevard • Compton, California 90221 • (213) 638 -1009 November 20, 1989 Charles Davis 1513 1/2 Tamarind Avenue Compton, CA. Re: Christmas Tree Lot, from Present to end of December, 1989. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: . This letter will serve as our authorization for the property located behind the Compton Cable Office on Long Beach Blvd. to be used by Charles Davis for a Christmas Tree Lot. During the above referenced date. sincerely, Margaret Haro Dalton Property Management Services for: Owner- Madison Avenue Properties _ � I u I TI U LT11VV000 1? 330 euwS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA VO v (713) 377 -0300 NOTICE OF INTENTION FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATION BY 'UAL ®xxx :IAL EVENT ❑ United C hildren's Fund IN THE CITY OF Lynwood )RESS Jerry l(aufman,PTogram Coordinatof 16 -18th Place CITY Long Beach, CA 90803 ZIP COOE 90803 FTE LEPHONE 213/987-3008 fE ORGANIZED INCORPORATED 4/12/87 Wash.D.C. TAX EXEMPT PREVIOUS LICENSE NUMBER 52- 1 51 5599 FEINiC63790 CA Lynwood Letter 8/21/91 )CEEDS TO BE APPLIED TO WHAT PURPOSE /USE) Please review Attachment A. 'E OF APPEAL ;IDLNTIAL -xL TYPE OF DONATIONS UCF COUPON BOOK DATE IS) OF SOLICITATION TERM OF REQUESTED LICENSE /PERMIT AMERCE/INDUSTRY $20 .donation FROM - N(DV 91 FROM TO ALS :AL kTE fIONAL SOLICITATION WILL BE MADE BY PAID SOLICITORS XX TV /RADIO ._ BOX OFFICE _ VOLUNTEERS _ MAIL _ OTHER: _ NEWSPAPER _ SALE INDICATE COMPENSATION, SALARIES, COMMISSIONS ETC. PAID TO STATE DETAILS ON CONDUCTORS _ MANAGERS_ REVERSESIOE PROMOTORS _ SOLICITORS_ IAME OF ORGANIZATION TO BE BENEFITED United Children's Fund ADDRESS - Corporate Su:1000, 1747 Pennsylvania AV NW TELEPHONE 202/785 -9500 Washington. D.C. 20006 DATE OF ACTIVITY )ESCRIPTION OF WHAT IT DOES LOCATION OF ACTIVITY Please review Attachment A. Southern California TAX EXEMPT NO. .OMISSION TO EVENT BY N/A NUMBER PRINTED NUMBERED F$20.00 E WITH TAX PICKET INVITATION DONATION )JECTED EXPENDITURES FOR THIS SOLICITATION: ZES PUBLICITY TRANSPORTATION 30R TELEPHONE RENTAL - EQUIPMENT )0 STATIONERY PURCHASE - EQUIPMENT /ORS ADVERTISING RESERVATION CHARGES SIC FOOD RESOLD (PER PLATE COSTS) 'TAGE DECORATIONS NTING $ 25,000-0 0 /ENTERTAINERS MERCHANDISE SOLO OTHER EXPENSE: COMII9: `S �; 00 0.00 ; FUMES RENTAL- BUILDING IFORMS PERMITS-LICENSE TOTAL _$50,000.00 ,FILERS NAME AND TITLE (TWO REQUIRED) ADDRESS Suite t 1000 TELEPHONE Inertia! 31 lit lan P. Dye, President 1747 Pennsylvania Av., N.W. (202) ,e1ur. , U 785 -9500 (301) Washington, D. C. 20006 ll nemaa title T.C. Magnotti, Secy- TTeas. P.O. Box 290 Shady Side, MID 20764 — vtute I 2 61 - 9223 SON IN CHARGE OF APPEAL AODRESS TELEPHONE It name erry Kaufman, UCF Program Coordinator 16 - t8th Place (213) " lure Long Beach, CA 90803 987 -3008 V AUCTICV44: ComoNtl In d0al1. Write .- None/Not e0011esb10° It 'ooroptl.y President and SoentwV WMturw WO Ordwrod. AR•eb nern•. •Odra., of :r1, dire[ , Of tha organization. Lin all eonbib.,.On, and Nair use 01 as"hditura for Calendar Vaar .rnrn IIAV Orecoalne thi, t01¢ital.on or Ora• d. annuak F01 tpesl esant,Oliertation for another Olgan.tallon, area, aYthorite[IOn thweflor,, ATTACHMENTS$ Attachment A, Exempt Documents,Fiscal Yr -End Statement. City of Seal Date Approved City Clerk A=ft rWI . ...... - - 2 5k 4�i teQ► i children's FUND. ?.cntati.._ rr L4'9' r7 ,;r'.'L_ _' ?� 'C;.'.- `i'..: F _. _ = ^!f'E. L' tTrn r l!:_ikEu = FUND 7t,! #`, - 1 �1 °` ^9: iPICORF' 'r:ABH DC #8 - 170 9 . CA, rr.F;p .40.1 CA.CHAk1TAPLE REC. h!O.CT - ' ^0 _c 0QL't e s t0 - ?new for _ . ternittent soliciting is apuraved b; CCuCC lcii `ho t es ..;,iii on ly inanth 3tat -us . ur f!. ±e,cIi men t A. Ca1i+arn:a and 1RS dacumentatlon .end Campai.i 'JC ..t ^ -.r. Our cam[•aigners have a United Children's Fund Padge :,rid 'united nd , •:c_at cook. h;:? an; ;ue=tions. please call me or Mrs. Bellamy at '10 1` nk y0u. .,_erely. �:1• -•rry Rauf man U:.ited Children's Fund FrCgram Coordinator 1' Change cf Address ! -12tn Place. Long Peach. CA 9080' TEL: - 110 987 - ?008 13CS / GkwgWAv OA STM4 N�� Q City o f LYNWOOD v4 Nq .Ahetug CAdhoges 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 80292 12131903.0220 AUGUST 21, 1991 UNITED CHILDREN'S FUND JERRY KAUFMAN, PROGRAM COORDINATOR 16 -18 PLACE LONG BEACH CA 90803 RE: YOUR CHARITABLE SOLICITATION APPLICATION FOR THE CITY OF LYNWOOD i�1111 Dear MR. KAUFMAN This is to inform you that the City Council of the City of Lynwood at it's meet- ing of AUG. 20, 1991, approved your application to conduct your event /solicitation /fund- raiser, from AS PER YOUR APPLICATION (DATES) 1991. Sincerely Marilyn Cabaret ' Business License Representative Aii'L.uA, ON DATES: August 15, 1991 to Cctohcr 31,tti1 S. , I 4 t i%Ho ren 5 FUND. AI'rAUIII[Fll'1' A The United Children r 1 is a V,rant uial;ing corporation located in Washington, I).0 and est-d,lished Io r;ulicit and expend funds to assist children. The Fund does nil: engage direci.Jy in charitable activity, but will make contributions Lo organizations acl.ive iu research, education, and charitable programs for ubildren, especially iu the fields of child safety, missing children, fanii.ly safety and child nl,use. The board of Directors of the Fund identifies those organizations engaged in Lite most Useful pursuits in these areas and providrs financial nssi:+I parLicularJy to organizations with important project.:; whi(di carJld nol, of iu:ruisc be pursued because of Lite lack of financing. Funds will be rni.sel through rJire 1. sales, telemarketing, direct -mail fundraising, by approarher. i,o private CouudaLious and corporations, acrd by endorsements. The Fwid wi I.J. register as a. clujritable organization in those states requiring such rrr;islration as a precondi.l. ion to fundraising. The Fwrd qualifies for federal Lax- exenv�L 1,1.ai.us u Section 51,11(c)(3); or Lire 1nLer1101 I(eveuue Code of JUUU nod is a public charily wider; SecLions 170(b)(1)(n)(vi) and 5UU(a)(1.) or Lite Code. ; Our direct solicitation will be lwinrarilY handled by paid solicitors exchanging one special. edition FUlld Check Coupon Book for each :$2O 00 contribution. Other merchaUL promotional items, as well as child identification and fingerprint kits will f:upplement Lite coupon book sales. The total cost of fundraising (couunissions and cost of meruhrmd.ise) will not exceed fifty percent (50 %) of the funds Henera.ted. All funds collected (professional fund raiser's check will be ncuepted in lieu of cash) are to be deposited into a local United Children's Fund banking accu -urt. All disbursements will be under the direct supervision of Alan Dye, President of United Children's Fund. Our Professional Fund Raiser may also markel. various child safety related items on a retail basis. A portion of these sales ranging from 7% - 25% will be donated by 1 the Professional Fund Raiser to United Children's Fund in these instances. The solicitation will taho Mace between the /lours of 10:00 a.m. - 0 :00 p «r , or per city code, and will emj no ex- felons OF persons uuciel' 13 years of age. 771G G& IM; 01- B flcfw. till P7t1J111' liy 11Ny Gi'IVG71NlM2 LWy MILI 'MII' BE RG7'BIs A IT9l tlfi' IN LNLCl /ia&7fhlP7'. ----------------------------------------- ---------------- United Children's Fund Corporate Office- TELL'PIIONL: 1 -8UU -458 -8683 ; Suite: 1000, 1747 Pennsylvan ia Avenue, IIW., Washington, U.C. 20008 ; ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1991 Change or Mdress.Jerry Raufman,UniLcxl Children's Fund Program Coordinator 16-18AVI Place, L(x)g Bench, Gil MAY03 2717-MME. ["1131 y117 -;II W 135 S. Orange Street • Glendale, CA 91204 • (818) 246 -2699 t chUch*n's FU N D 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue. N.W Washington D.C. 20008 1- 800. 438.8883 RESOLUTION Be it hereby resolved by the Board of Directors of the United Children's Fund that Jerry Kaufman is authorized to act for the corporation in applying for licenses to solicit contributions in any city or state requiring such a license as a condition of solicitation. Sworn and subscribed to before me this ?4/4A day of September, 1991. Notary Public My Commission Expires: Debra 8I2ck Nohry ftb ic. District Of ColumOis My Commisuon Expires Oct. 10. 1992 Formed to help protect our oatlon's greatest resource ... our children. 'rrNOTAR T F ucrs i r t v Q Q ► � children s FUND. UNITED CHILDREN'S FUND CORPORATE OFFICERS and BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE OFFICERS: President Alan P. Dye 118 Tennessee Ave.. NE Washington, D.C. 20072 Tel: (202) 543 -8467 Social Security No.: 267 -68 -0269 Driver's License No: 267 -68 -0269 Secretary- Treasurer T. C. Magnotti P.O. Box 290 Shady Side. Maryland 20764 Tel: (301) 261 -9223 BOARD OF DIRECTORS: Alan P. Dye 118 Tennessee Ave., NE Washington. D.C. 20002 Tel: (202) 543 -8467 Social Security No.: 267 -68 -0269 Driver's License No: 267 -68 -0269 T. C. Magnotti P.O. Box 290 Shady Side, Maryland 20764 Tel: ( 261 -9223 John Schomer 1 Jackson Square Jackson, Michigan 49203 Driver's License No: D510- 415 -42 -607 CORPORATE OFFICE: 'c8003 458 8683 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, D. C. 20006 0 0 • UNANIMOUS CONSENT RESOLUTION President & Director: ALAN P. DYE 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 543 -8467 SSN 4267680269 Driver's license #267680269 Secretary, Treasurer & Director: T.C. Magnotti P.O. Box 290 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by unanimous consent that the following persons shall serve as officers and directors of United Children's Fund through December 31, 1991. Shady Side, MD 20764 Telephone: (301) 261 -9223 SSN #483584798 Director: John Schomer 1 Jackson Square Jackson, MI 49203 Driver's license #D510- 415 -42 -607 SSN #339283405 2� u ca � c oo FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 9750 Business Park Drive, Suite 214 Sacramento, California 95827 -1.702 Telephone (213) 955 -0963 United Children's Fund ., 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue,N.W., Suite 1000 Washington Purpose Charitable Code Section d Form of Organization Corporation Accounting Period Ending: December Organization Number August 7 1987 X In reply refer to 344: 355: LA: PAI t ac On the basis of your stated purpose and the understanding that your present operations will continue or will be as proposed in your application, ou are exempt from state franchise or income tax under the section of the y Revenue and Taxation Code indicated above. Any changs's in operation, character or purposes must be reported to this office immediately for consideration of their effect upon your exempt status. You also must report any changes in name or address. i You are required to file Form 199 (Exempt Organization Annual Information! Return) or Form 199B (Exempt Organization Annual Information Statement) on or before the 15th day of the 5th month (4 1/2 months) after the close of your accounting period. See annual instructions with forms for requirements. You are not required to file state franchise or income tax returns unless you have income subject to the unrelated business income tax under Section 23731 of the code. In this event, you are required to file Form 109 (Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return) by the 15th day of the Sthj month (4 1/2 months) after the close of your annual accounting period. I i If the organization is incorporating, this approval will expire unless incorporation is completed with the Secretary of State within 60 days. Exemption from federal income or separate applications. M. Xokinos Supervisor Exempts and Special Tax Unit General Audit Section cot taxes and other state taxes requires This exemption is granted on the condition that the organization will secure a Federal Exempt Sta with the Internal Revenue Service and will furnia a copy of it to the Franchise Tax Board within,9 months of this letter. L. Fernandez -Loa Angelea Public Service Unit I Supervisor c i FTB 4207 .i 't l ; afi� • �w Ca o ifornio Of VICE OF THE SECRETARY 01 ,FATE SACNAMEN r0 conoonenci nW eEn 1, MARCII PUN(; 17,U, :wetclary of State of Ule .Slate of Califonfa, hereby certify: That oil tile_ 5th ,__day of ___._ .tune , 0)_87 _.UC7.L'L'EU__C ILS.LDREN!_S._LUNU__________ «corporation orlpouccd and ('.Iislilig under the hno.s of District of Columbia ---- , eomphed with [lie requirements of California lain fn effeel on that date, for the purpose of gnali fying to transact intrastate business fn the Stale of California (/fill that os of said dale said corporation became and mo fs fully qualifie(1 and matkolized to transact inYrasMtc business fn the State of Cohfoinia, subfecl, hollleael', to any heensi?Ig requirements otherwise iopnsed lilt the laws of this Stale CE -111 ld IN wn n�r�s w•nr:urxll• I e.ecule IhisceiliticAv:uid ;1fli.x the Gm;;l tieal of 16e'ilalc Ihit d:i v.d 19th June, 1987 (ll ca/ld,I = Ten S,,,, nn,( nJ Mnlr L Sate o ` Ca ifornia I OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE C0I1PORATION DIVISION 1 MARCH FONG L U, Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify: That the annexed transcript has been comt)are with the corporate record on file in this office, of which it purports to be a copy, and that same is full, true and correct. IN WITNESS WIILREOF, I execute this certificate and affix the Great Seal of the State of California this JUN 2 21987 UtiV,,cPn JV '�C. Secretary of State S[CISTAT[ FORM CGI07 6! m � Ie MITI Internal Revenue rvice District Director • Department of the Treasury Datr. J 23, 1987 Employer Identification Humber: Cass Number. Person to Contact Miss D. James United Children's eland c9 ntect Telephone li mb 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., t1.51., #1000 1301) 902 -47' Y or ' Washington, DC 20006 Accounting Period Ending: December 31 Foundation Status ClassIll ca 1° 509(a)(1) and 17c) (1)(A)(•ri) Advance Ruling Period End,: December 31, 1991 Dear Applicant : Caveat Applies•. Yes Based on information supplied, and assuming l application for recognition of exemption, we haveodeterminedons will be as stated d yoll income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Codeu are exempt from Fe Because You are a newly created organization, we are not. now making a final determination of your foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code. However, we have determined that you can reasonably b expected t organization described in section 509 (al (1) and 170 ?b3Z1J(A)�vy)ly supported ) I Accordingly, you will be treated as a publicly supported organization, and not as a private foundation, during an advance ruling period. This advance ruling period begins the date of your Inception and ends on the date shown above. Within 90 days after the end of information needed to determine whether You advance ruling period, you must submit to us you have met the requirements of the applicable support test during the advance ruling period. It you establish that you have been a Publicly supported organization, you will be classified as I a section 509(x)(1) or 509(x)(2) organization as long as you continue to meet the requirements of the a support test. If you do not meet the public support requirements during the advance PPli ruling period, you will be classified as a private foundation for future periods. Also, if you are classified as a private foundation, you will be treated as a private foundatic from the date of your Inception for purposes of sections 507(d) and 4940. Grantors and contributors may rely on the determination that you are not a private foundation until 90 days after the and of required information within the 90 day Your advance ruling period. It ycu submit the the advance determination until the Servlceamakes antinaltdeterminatiancontinue status, to rely c your foundatic If notice that you will no longer be treated as a publicly supported organization is determination tafterttheadatevOfuSuchlpublication. Ineaddition, ifo O may not rely an a publicly supported organization and a You lose your status g aware or, the act or failure to act that resultedrinont u ribu xa5 responsible for, or wo! may not rely on this determination from the data of the act failure st t p te grantor or contributor learned that the Service had given notice that you would be remove,' (over) I 31 Hopkins Plaza, aahin,,al. MO 21201 Letter 1045(00) (Rev. 6 -gel from classification as a *blicly supported organization hen that person may not rely on this determination as of a date such knowledge was acgled. If Your sources of support. or your purposes, character, or method of operation change, please let us know so we can consider the effect of the change on your exempt status and foundation status. In the case of an amendment to your organizational document or bylaws, please send us a copy of the amended document or bylaws. Also, you should inform us of all changes in your name or address. As of January 1. 1984, you are liable for taxes tinder the Federal insurance Contributions Act (social security taxes) on remuneration of $100 or more you pay to each of your employees during a calendar year. You are not liable for the tax imposed under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). Organizations that are not private foundations are not subject to the excise taxes under Chapter 42 of the Code. However, you are not automatically exempt from other Federal excise taxes. If you have any questions about excise, employment, or other Federal taxes, please let us know. Donors may deduct contributions to you as provided in section 170 of the Code. Bequests. legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to you or for your use are deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes if they meet the applicable provisions of sections 2055, 2108, and 2522 of the Code. You are required to file Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, only if your gross receipts each year are normally more than $25.000. If a return is required, it must be filed by the 15th day of the fifth month after the end of your annual accounting period. The law imposes a penalty of $10 a day, up to a maximum of $5,000, when a return is filed late, unless there is reasonable cause for the delay. You are not required to file Federal income tax returns unless you are subject to the tax on unrelated business income under section 511 of the Code. If you are subject to this tax, you must file an income tax return on Form 990 -T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return. In this latter, we are not determining whether any of your present or proposed activities are unrelated trade or business as defined in section 513 of the Code. You need an employer identification number even if you have no employees. If an employer identification number was not entered on your application, a number will be assigned to you and you will be advised of it. ?lease use that number on all returns you file and in all correspondence with'the Internal Revenue Service. If the heading of this letter indicates that a caveat applies, the caveat below is an integral part of the letter. Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your exempt status and foundation status, you should keen It in veur nermnnwne. ,. .... a. If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. Sincerely yours, Teddy R ern District Director Letter 1045(00) (B -ar 0 CAVEAT This determination is based on evidence that your funds are dedicated to the purposes set out in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. To assure your continued exemption, you should maintain records to show that funds are expended only for those purposes. If you distribute funds to other organizations, your records should show whether they are exempt under section 501(c)(3). In cases where the recipient organization is not exempt under section 501(c)(3), there should be evidence that the funds remain dedicated to the required purposes and that they will be used for those purposes by the recipient. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 55- 1515599 4 O O Fam S S-4 (Re,. No"t-W 1965) Oeoa -t-r a!me Trenay Ire MIJI RMnyf SIhKe 10 Type a orpatatnn Q Indrrdual p True p Pannerama CO Plan mbeonsvator 11 Coumy m pmrclpa business location i'1 Gew mannr f at u... x .... . ry . . P9 a!w. +,ta 12 Regan la loahmg OIIreI Pur Salted ndw wuO ea+ar.a a ausmf++ + 3 Gwfglnomaolecoro.rg 13 Acquisit inst ruct ng Oslo (Ma- day, yea 4 -22 -87 1e Nature of pmru0al aemty(SN voting aft) TI We narrrf al au+rru++d different 11ae item 1 13 ve da:e wage+or annunKS were peas N/A Fimdraisin and charitable distributions 6 aaaer wuKitNI OYCe 01 WLMa (NUmew end tVM) WWI easaid(M - d ay , y U tknown la aa ooaed a tw n o" 121 o rrruprnutay oeaed n M ee 12 monlM llatraendr 17 ur atoarr+re ooerete mac Iran Washington, D.C. 20006 01 nare. Crew "On 10 S 0 — 0 _ one office of ewww if Mew of the www a ar Winne an, sad to wnernr Y" 19 It naf et Of buafras o man-filic urg. la uaOaYeneref fwfpNSaM) 0u0he nta01 N/A pmoaamPr A rse a rare, m W ater used. 2e Naa the Innocent Corr Samoa l> an went'hest" nmreer lw use as" anw ouureaa! Tea Q me IN wnand vas an». Me arew sops der. tlry. ae. derwMetMa IYro wto aeCrr +reenawd +tore. � taraaleawpKaa oaoar, taste pWael /arMl�eareMetara.aretandaar•/!e TMepnww Mrvior(incias area Cpr) , 53gfoturs aM T61e► 'k rector ores- 4/30/87 1 (202) 783 -9500 Meese Nose lies UR class Yi RmfaappL Part 1 j •• L 2: �.9. OOrE Nflf1T PRINTING Orr :CG .966- 169.:37 O O O O G O O O Q O O O For Clear copy an both Parts. please type or print with ball point Pen a Press firmly. Application for Employer Identification Number (For use by employers and ethers. P(aasa read OM6 No 1547.0003 the separate instructions before completing this form.) Excess 6•]126 For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice. sea separate inttl'1100ns. 1 Namr(Ttue 2 $coal tatYdy nd..d+ae oroprretw 3 Gwfglnomaolecoro.rg UNITED CH=RENIS FUND N/A 1 December TI We narrrf al au+rru++d different 11ae item 1 3 OrrY wnr f ear, d outsold. Foam elm t „m,, J urauuer, w N/A pnfar t see d ing 6 aaaer wuKitNI OYCe 01 WLMa (NUmew end tVM) 7 MaNmg ad&eud different 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., #1000 Same 6 City. ear. and ZIP ma g euy, safe, and ZA coda i Washington, D.C. 20006 Same aWdren s FUND. ROSTER OF CAMPAIGN WORKERS FUND RAISER: Good Cause Marketing City: Reseda office No.. 818 8815845 Date: 9 -26 -91 PAGE 1 OF 2. OFFICE AREA CODE: - - - - - -- ---- -- ----- - - - NOTE ALL BLANKS ----------------------------------- MUST BE FILLED IH TO OBTAIN CITY LICENSING NAME: Adrian Ginju -------------------------- SOCIAL SECURITY No: 13_0-62 - 2 TEL.NO.:[ (818)) 994 -0989 DRIVER'S Date of Birth:. 1 2 -13 -59 LICENSE STATE: N0: STREET ----------------- - ADDRESS: 135-35 Valerio St. ---------------------- APT NO: 231 -------------- CITY_ Van Nuys STATE: CA ZIP NAME: Jill Saltzman --------------------------------- SOCIAL SECURITY X0: -55 -4109 TEL.NO.:[ 345 - DRIVER'S Date of Birth: ()q -70-63 LICENSE STATE: r_ NO: f71467R7 STREET -AME:-- ADDRESS: 5424 Ww-astle Avenue ------- - --- APT No: 358 - --- CITY. Encino STARE: CA ZIP 91316 nAME: Da DanaHeym-------- Dana Heyrtan -- ------- --------------------------- --------------- - SOCIAL SECURITY NO: 312 TEL.NO.: 818 994 - 5754 DRIVE R'S Date of Birth: 7 - - r - 5F' LICENSE STATE: CA N0: ' STREET ADDRESS: 16642 COhasset St. APT NO: 14 CITY: Van Nuys STATE: CA 91395 ---------------------------------------------------- ZIP MAKE: Vera Christine Oergan - ---- --- ---- ---- --- --- - --- -- - - --------- SOCIAL SECORITY X0: -19 -2430 TEL.HO.:[ 818 507{:275 DRIVER'S LICENSE STATE: V? Birth: 1 0-11-59 ?? V??? no: y7D139n 392 I STREET ADDRESS: 337 Th0Ip50n Ave. No: 1 CITY: - - - - - -- - APT ----------------------- STATE: ZIP91201 I NAME: Edgar De la Fuente ---- - -------- ------- -- - . SOCIAL SECURITY NO: A1R7 T EL.NO.:1818 j 366 -4rA7 DRIVER'S LICENSE STAT ate of Birth: 114p-(,g rJL— NO: 15C�BDGS� STREET ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDRESS: 11152 Gaviota Ave. APT NO: CITY: pWada Hills STATE: CQA CA ZIP 91344 Leonard Spetter SOCIAL SECURITY NO y,;w TEL. NO.:( 818 j 705 -4727 DRIVER'S Date of Birth: �- jj LU Yl LICENSE STATE: OR No: STREET ADDRESS: 19425 Fleynes APT NO: CITY: Reseda STATE: CA --------------------------------- ---- ------ ------- --- --- ZIP -- ------ 135 S. Orange Street • Glendale, CA 91204 • (818) 246 -2699 • FUND RAISER: Good Cause Marketing City: Reseda Office Na.. 818 881 -5845 Date: 9 -26 -91 FUND. '0 t o 0 children s ROSTER OF CAMPAIGN WORKERS PAGE 2 OF 2 OFFICE AREA CODE: - _ - ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - NOTE ALL BLANKS MUST BE FILLED IN TO OBTAIN CITY LICENSING --- --- --------------------------------------------------- ------------------ NAME: Bdbbye L. Davis SOCIAL SECURITY N0: 566`76 -0 --------- TEL.NO.: E X818 897 -5309 DRIVER'S LICENSE STATN of Birth: 08_1 52 _ Pl�_ X19746 STREET ADDRESS: 12705 Peirce St. APT NO: CITY: Pacoima STATE: CA ZIP91331 - --- --- --- -- ------ -- ---= --------------------------------------- - NAME: Albert Wawock SECURITY - --------------- - SOCIAL NO: 550 SECURITY N0: 50 - 68184 TEL.NO.: Date of Birth: DRIVER'S LICENSE STATE: 0 NO: STREET ADDRkft4: 3601 Fletcher --------------------------------- NAME: Karla Brothers TEL.NO.:[ 805 1 269 -1873 APT NO: CITY: BUfbark STATE :CA ZIP 91055 -- SOCIAL SECURITY NO: 560-99 -9269 Date of Birth: 11-23- DRIVER'S LICENSE STATE: CA NO: STREET ADDRESS: 3905 Banson St. P.O. ---------------------------- 151 APT NO: CITY: Acton STATE: CA ZIP93510 NAME: 5hawrlee L. Nxwood ----------------------------------------------- SOCIAL SECURITY NO: 547 - 59-9%0 TEL.NO.:1818 1 890 -0978 STREET ADORES 1S 0036 Bordeaux Ave. DRIVER'S APT NO: Date of Birth: 0 - LICENSE STATE: CA o: CFL178245 CITY: Arleta CA 91331 MAKE: ---- - STATE: --- SOCIAL SECURITY NO: - ZIP TEL.NO.: DRIVER'S Date of Birth: LICENSE STATE: N0: STREET ADDRESS: --------- -° ----------------- APT NO: ----- -- --- CITY: STATE: ZIP NAME: ----- ----- --- -- ------ °------------------------------- SOCIAL SECURITY NO: TEL.NO.: 1 DRIVER'S Date of Birth: LICENSE STATE: N0: STREET ADDRESS: --------------------------------------------------- APT NO: CITY: STATE: ----------------------- ZIP -------' 135 S. Orange Street • Glendale, CA 91204 • (818) 246 -2699 0 Purple Heart Veterans Rehabilitation Services, Inc. SUITE 225.553 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD. LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA 90802. TELEPHONE (213) 432.8477 City of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA. 90262 ATTENTION: CITY CLERK /PERMITS PREVIOUS PERMIT NO: 2869 In checking ou-- files we find our current permit, to solicit- in your city will expire in December 1991. We respectfully request that you favor us with a _en_wal of oL:r application. We no longer have foot solici *ors, we solicit by telephone only and no money is solicited. Our trucks pick up any donated items to be resold in our Thrift Stores. we are a non - profit, tax- exempt corporation. Should You require further information that is not included with this regv.est please let us know and we will supply it. Sincerely, PURPLE HEART VETERANS REHABILITATION SERVCIF.S, INC. aymond F. Warren Rehabilitation Coordinator RF W /pc WAR" Inm 25b i U1 I Y Uta LYIVWUUU (_ 1 1 LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 9137. (116) 577 -0600 NOTICE OF INTENTION FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATION, BY , 1 _. i ANNUAL SPECIAL EVENT ADDRESS TED 3), LICENSE REST E APPEAL NATI ON a (a OAT (SI OF SOLICITATION TERM OF REQUESTED LICENSE /PERP RESIDENTIAL �� I��O �� ^" COMMERCE /INDUSTRY 1 1 c kc*- FROM //ll6llgl TO I j// FROM / / /!(p /Ql TO il//G/Q4 GOALS SOLICITATION WILL BE MADE BY INDICATE COMPENSATION. SALARIES. COMMISSIONS ETC. PAID TO ,UCI P LOCAL �x PAID SOLICITORS _,// TV /RADIO.._ BOX OFFICE _ i1P. DETAILS STATE VOLUNTEERS y MAIL _ OTHER: _ CONOUCTORS _ MANAGERS_ REVERSESIO! NATIONAL NEWSPAPER _ SALE PROMOTORS _ SOLICITORS_ > NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO BE BENEFITED ADDRESS TELEPHONE r- CCt'l t ?O• tSt < DESCRIPTION OF WHAT IT DOES F Z t W L ADMISSION TO EVENT BY T_ICKETID INVITATION DON ATION a N PROJECTED EXPENDITURES FOR THIS SOLICITATION: PRIZES PUBLICITY LABOR TELEPHONE FOOD /r0• X�_— STATIONERY FAVORS' ADVERTISING MUSIC /0 - CO FOOD RESOLD POSTAGE DECORATIONS _ PRINTING ENTERTAINERS COSTUMES RENTAL - BUILDING UNIFORMS — PERMITS - LICENSE CITY LOCATION OF ACTIVITY Sic IN Z NUMBER PRINTED NUMBERED --�? 5, crr� P1 TRANSPORTATION RENTAL -EQUIPMENT PURCHASE£OUIPMENT RESERVATION CHARGES (PER PLATE COSTS) MERCHANDISE SOLD OTHER EXPENSE: TOTAL DATE OF ACTT V �l /al /9l 501 (3) Cc,l vL 0 OFFICERS NAME AND TITLE (TWO REQUIRED)) ADDRESS /� TELEPHONE I Prim nerms &title �`�°i2 //cfgQus 'J/i%L'CCC.'Or •�-�{ (��1n1a FILE• S.aratura / ! /iA /On7�/f �fro ke atp I Print nelta 8 ticN slyl.nlre (A' . 5E6- PERSON IN CHARGE OF APPEAL ADDRESS TELEPHONE P J nr4 A� #g 13) Pent Paine 12 - I • &2?26 ' Siaatun } SE� -Q70 INSTRUCTIONS: Cmnplan in dW. Wrlta - NOM/NM OWno~- It epproWiSM Prwidern via Seeretery MMarw ere Preferred. AtrWh name; aOdra OMKert. awsctCra 01 I" ereer.d .ibn. LiR all COn:rl[ut!OM end t4ew mat w atm"iture fm Calendar Year 0M10dM16 praeedbq dIH miclatmn Or 0rpv.0e Y "d.t. fW npealal pant apl Knat.O % fW anpt w Oryontastdn. ettaan wincr.ae[IOn dlerefrOnrl. f ` \ City of Date Approved I City Clerk i AGENDA IT= IN THE CITY OF Lin wcox ZIP CODE I. TELEPHONE • SOLICI'T'ORS ROS'I'ER 0 NAME ADDRESS Curtis Cupp.les 10254 Virginia Ave., South Gate, Ca. 90280 Jeffrey Day " Eric Dyson " Dominic Gagliano John He.lmit " " " Jim Jensen " " " " Ray Levey Robert Metcalf Bobby Ortega Michael Payne Helyn Conti Raj Dunbar Gracie Gonzales Craig McClintock Christine Arguijo Cynthia Cook Brenda Cooper Thomas Harding Robert Hinton Frank Jiminez Earl McGregor Rand} Messman Robert Rendon Marc Sheets " " " 11 1p Raj Soler Bryon Strombom Lance Walker " " Craig Ward " " " 1p 11 Renee Ross Cornelius Long Lorrinda Gulledge " 1p Pete Armas Hole' Sandoval Louis Mannara Anthony Cipriano William Appleton Todd Irvine Vince McCra}r Dennis Cruz Donnell Shag " Brian Boners Daniel Betancourt Joseph Dungee Brendon Middleton Phone # is: MEN... (213) 566 -9703 566 -9624 WOMEN ... (213) 566 -2720 James Jenson 21 SOLICI'T'OR ROSTER Rendon 37 Michael Payne 20 NAME AtSSN# 22 DL# S Bryan Stombom 29 551 -41 -5557 N8519023 5 Randy Messman 36 314 -62 -7806 A3645099 Marc Sheets 33 526 -35 -1010 A6790471 Thomas Hardy 26 568 -53 -5905 U2005174 Eric Dyson 32 218 -72 -6457 U6105815 Renee Ross 24 558 -13 -3367 U5135244 Craig McClintock 29 564 -49 -7221 N9127834 Marie Austin 2i 528 -19 -0910 A6622851 Bobby Ortega 27 550 -49 -6613 CO518104 Gracie Gonzales 2b 550 -41 -0491 A1511809 Julio Rosado 31 054 -54 -5702 A9286278 Craig Ward 26 055 -60 -2957 A9522630 Earl McGregor 26 571 -65 -6795 C /65036$ Brenda Cooper 34 547 - 13 - 9380 N5076523 Bob Hinton 29 540 -88 -3529 A8964967 Lance Walker 30 567 -35 -4095 CO229321 Jeffrey Day 27 559 -53 -8717 C1463486 Raymond Soler 26 572 -08 -3454 C1217519 He.lyn Conti 33 050 -50 -7256 N8823813 Robert Formella 40 399 -54 -0550 C3824707 Raymond Levey 26 550 -08 -1152 C2677516 Rayne.11 Dunbar 37 561 -86 -1677 N0963625 Frank Jiminez Jr.30 570 -39 -5324 N8765539 Robert Metcalf 26 553 -67 -9941 C5135841 Joseph Dungee 30 048 -64 -7194 12885512 M James Jenson 21 Robert Rendon 37 Michael Payne 20 Cynthia Cook 22 Cornelius Lone 31 Lorinda Gulledge 19 Pete Armas 30 Holly Sandoval 21 Luis Mannara 43 Anthonv Cinriano 21 William Appleton 38 'Todd Irvine 25 Vince McCray 26 Dennis Cruz 29 Donnell Shaw 38 Brendon Midd.leton24 Brian Bowers 18 Daniel Betancourt30 (Texas) 535 -74 -5754 48975740r M 546 -96 -5266 N2209460 M 571 -93 -5035 A3099642 M 526 -25 -4054 A4592505 F 563 -31 -6184 N6394004 M 593 -30 -2420 G43252371 -F k8890 Fla) 551 -25 -7555 J8083807 M 556 -35 -9365 A1430845 F 180 -36 -0891 N/A M nR7- 70 -9AFi4 r4i77n-;16 M (304702 NJ) 203 -44 -5669 A70947856 M (604534 NJ) 546 -45 -4409 C3205576 M 1 01- 62- 0214MO310310434M 57089965NY 561 -31 -0956 A1451492 M 264 -06 -8111 500016053 M (1050Fia) 556 -81 -5800 C5980862 M 561 -53 -9345 A7444599 M 482 =58 -4451 N/A M E7C� /EYES M B1d /Hz.l M Br /Br M Br/B1 4 Bid /B1 M Blk /Br F Br /B1 M Br /B1 F Br /B.l M Br /Br F Br /Br M B1 /Br M Br /Br M B1 /Br F Br /Br M Bld /B1 M Blk /Br M Br /Gr M Br /Hzl F Br /Br M Bld /B.l M Br /Hzl M Blk /Br M Blk /Br M B.ld /B.l B1k /Br W'I' 185 180 200 210 165 147 190 250 180 115 160 160 170 165 175 190 170 170 150 210 170 165 130 140 180 HT 6'2 5'4 5'8 6'3 6'2 5'7 5'10 5'8 5'7 5'2 5'4 5'7 5'8 5'6 5'9 5'8 5'11 6'0 5' 6 6'1 5'4 5'8 5'7 6'0 5'10 Br /Br 160 6'3 Blk /Br 175 5 Br /B1 200 6'1 Aub /Gr 190 5'7 B1k /Br 230 6'0 B.lk /Br 130 5 B1k /Br 180 5'7 Br /Br 180 5 Br /Br 185 5'8 Rr /Rr ')nn r Aub /B1 200 5'6 Br /Gr 180 5'7 B1k /Br 210 6 Blk /Br 160 5'6 . B1k /Br 160 5'6 Br /Br 235 5'9 Brn /B1 170 5 Blk /Br 205 612 KP 11 '91 11 7 TIEII CHALLEU;E #90 714- 6Ec - 2Eth 1 - , ;, OFRCE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE >T/• a � :t i' 1 � � � 715 IJf �„ r} CERTIFICATE OF STATUS DOMESTIC CORPORATION F c.L 1. 'MARCH FO \C Eli. Secretan of State of the State of Californiu, hereby c•crtify That on the day of W Dece:rber TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORN'IA,.INC 1 64 became inrorporoted under the lau's of the State of California bi filing irs .-IrticIeS nf 1n- corpnrntion in this of and That no record exists in this office of a certificate of dissolution of said corporcuon nor of a court order declaring dissolution thereof, nor of a merger or consolidation which terminated its existence and That said corpnration•s c•orporote powers, ri:ht.c and prtrileges are not suspended on the records of this of and That according to the record, of this office, the said corporation is authorized to exer- cise all its corporate powers, nt;lits and privile ges and is in -ood le .-al standing in the State of California, and That no information is available in this office on the financial condition, business ec- .. ... ___ .......... „C.i.i,. -.non T f r r...ifv organized under the General Nonprofit Corporation Law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this certificate and affix the Great .Seal of the State of California this 11th da-, of February, 1991 Secretary of State ecc,Tw.f. IO•Y CE „z CREW 7.e7`1 • •• �• er .w r Ad*�ay redj is r.a ba Lea Am"M Cal. 9WS3 _ i GCezzlc3 EQGt; qcm? Air Internal Revenue Ser,,lca L Code 414. Tae= C`.�"ar t' .Se.:t.hx C:` �, P. 0. Bc ' �C3 Paaa`ars Ca'=_•c —+".s Pumas.: " "0-4 tnwrir6r• e d File Resurea .;,h Di prig DvKt�. e� M/ewr et Re.'anr./ _. /enw ►90.♦ Raprr.� •exe.wUtwe_ r.ried Ew .jiw r• Ion 1= -aaa CZYee ❑ We Dac =ber 31 Cm the 6esis o! your storied sees the undr_;� � lhrt you operetior3 ;rc;c:ed in year will earttintr a evidercrd to date or will enlc.^ to those ar rullr a;pli^tIan, we have r_rr!ude - that you are ezcr.;. from Fe -'real inr_me. tax as an er - raiza :ion desetLed c Interr Code. el Revenue Code. Any rages in e;r_; es iat 501(c.'( 501(c.'( o ic. _m the de :c in sea iled, or in your chcr_c er pureses, must be reported ir_-__teteiy to your post. -tc Di r_ = fa ea- sideret:en of their eL'ec U, yctrr e:em ;t sterns. You must also reper, cry cZ in year cct:.e or 'c._ You are not required to file Fr'e .I `as. re.t_;s so Ieng - , You retain an exe..:,t s :c ;us, I you are su ject to the tax On unre.a;e_ _caress i.ca. -e impcsed by sec•:icn 511 of the Code, in wn.ch even: yo are reetured tz file Form rSSO'T. Cur deters it = ::on as to your licF:!ity fc filing _• the chmrl inlc- tien return. Form Si7.A, is set fcrth shave. That return, if requLred, must be lilyo on or before tie l5th day of the fifth month aft•; the c!ese of your annual ac^untirg per ;c„ indicmte3 abcve. Contributions rte to you are deductible by d ='=3 as Prided in se'-t r IM of the Code. E qurocs, le:.eies, devises, trans or gifts to c far yc_ use :re de•_'uctble terFe•_+e _l estate on_ gift tax pUreses under tkx pravfatenz of se: :cn 2755, 21Co C 25I2 of the Cade. You c:r n_! lizb!e ter the axes brposr' under the Fr': _! h:sur_.:ce Contributions Ac: (sotto! security taxes) cues: you !Ile a w^iver of r%er..;ttcs teralit - . you cr tor as provided in such ac: not liable far the tax ir..pca1 uncle: the Fe'_e:a! I;remp!oynt lax Ac. Inquiries about the er c r of exemption : :tfi�re Ir. scale! tr_ r :!y re te:res sit: :e c'!••.ssed rc the aL /lc-, questions conaernirq excise, etc ;ioyr -cnt or other FeOer•! ' taxes. This is a dete..ine:ien Ic:tc ... You are cautiezed that upon dissolutio Your re= ai=iv assets must be distri- buted to az orgazizatien described in section 5C1(c)(3) Of the Code a:.•. exe=rt r, -= FN_e::: izeme tax. Very truly Yours, 7. F.S. Sch/nwt ci_ rl:: pirr_tar Foam L•173 iocv. ►.at 0 6 Sout A rEE erII Callfo , r� P o Bo 739 LLEN 77118 Gate, C A 902 � �r 80 ',� r 3s a ce rtifI ea tha in good astandin, E ric 'ven 0 6 Date: Deecenber 3, 1991 To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL From: Kenrick Karefa- Johnson, Director Community Development Cpl, ,2J1l / By: Shane F. Moshiri, Economic Development Division Subject: REQUEST BY CHARLES DREW UNIVERSITY FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM CITY'S RENTAL INCREASE. Purpose: The Head Start School has submitted a written request for the wavier of the recently- approved increase in the rental rates by the City Council. Background Information On April 16, 1991, the City Council approved a by Lynwood Redevelopment Agency for a general rates for all the City and Agency -owned prop( of the rent increase was twofold: 1) to bring more consistent with the prevailing market enhance the flow of annual rental revenues. Following the ratification of the staff report on the above date, monthly rent for the above - mentioned tenant was enhanced by $100.00 as an element of the comprehensive rent increase. This marked the first time that the change in the monthly rent took place since the School entered into an agreement for the lease of the City -owned property located in John D. Ham Park (Parcel No. 6189 -32 -900). Discussion: The Head Start is a day care facility which has been in operation in the City of Lynwood under the sponsorship by Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science. The school rents, as it has in the past, the subject property for a period of nine months on annual basis. On the above date, the monthly rent was increased by $100.00 bringing the rent to $350.00 per month. A review of the Head Start's requests indicates that the center wishes to receive special consideration based upon the following facts. we are informed that the center solely bears the cost associated with the maintenance of the property. Further, it is maintained that the school has installed an elaborate alarm system on the Premises of which the City's Ham Park Community Center is a beneficiary: the system provides electronic surveillance for the Community Center as well - -the Coverage apparently remains in force in the summer during which time the school is in recess. AGENDA ITEM 2(a proposal set forth increase in rental arties. The purpose the rent structure rates, and 2) to Finally, the center informs us that the rent increase was imposed after the passage of the school's budget. And as a result, no additional funds monies have been allocated for the purpose of the payment of the rental increase. Conclusion: The Head Start day care center has been providing the local residents with a valuable service in the past few years. In fact, the center is among those very few facilities in operation in the City of Lynwood. Moreover, the City's Community Center has benefited considerably from the existence of the alarm system installed by the latter, thus, precluding the need for purchase of another system at substantial cost by the Community Center itself. It is undeniably clear that the center has, and continues to, provided a valuable service to the community. Moreover, the Community Center has indeed benefited monetarily from the protection of the alarm system afforded by the school thus far. Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the Council, upon review of the forgoing facts, issues a directive with respect to the above request. DATE: December 3, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Michael T. Heriot, City Manager SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE'S HOLIDAY TIME OFF PURPOSE R/ / To request Council's approval on allowing holiday time off for employees. FACTS For the past several years Council has given approval for additional time off on the following occasions: 1) Christmas Dinner, December 19 1991 6.30 PM: Allow employees to leave 2 hours early to prepare themselves for the party, with the understanding that each department must be staffed to serve the public until the end of the normal business day. 2) Christmas Eve /New Year's Eve: One (1), five (5) hour increment of time off on either of the named occasions with the same understanding as above. RECOMMENDATION Council provide staff with their wishes for this year or grant approval of the above. DATE: December 2, 1991 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE FROM: Kenrick R. Karefa- Johnson, Director Community Development Department CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL BY M +D MANAGEMENT TO DEVELOP PERIMETER RETAIL SHOPS AT THE MARKETPLACE OF LYNWOOD, 3100 E. IMPERIAL HIGHWAY. Purpose: M +D Management has submitted a proposal to develop additional retail lease space at the Marketplace of Lynwood. They are proposed to be located along the exterior front of the existing building facing Imperial Highway. The shops, as proposed, will range in size from 160 sq. ft. to 360 sq. ft. Facts: 1. M +D has an approved Conditional Use Permit, CUP 31, which was issued by the Lynwood Planning Commission on January 9, 1990. Conditional Use Permit No. 31 requires that all leasable space be at least 400 sq. ft. in size. 3. Land Use and Zoning: The Land Use Designation on the subject property is commercial, while the zoning classification is CB -1 (Controlled Business) Zone. The use as proposed is an allowable use, as is consistent with both land use and zoning. Description: M +D Management proposes the development of nine separated lease spaces (shops) that will range from 160 sq. ft. to 320 sq. ft. in size (see plan). Three shops are 160 sq. ft., four shops are 200 - 235 sq. ft., and two shops are 360 sq. ft. The total lease space proposed is 1995 sq. ft. The shops are proposed along the entire front of the existing building and are to be constructed of metal studs and textured plaster to match the existing building. M+D contends that similar projects of this magnitude have been proposed in other centers in other cities. Staffs preliminary concerns are related to the aesthetics of the proposal and the requirements of the existing Conditional Use Permit. Ideally, staff would like to see a more elaborate and sophisticated design for the shops. Materials such as brick and glass (atrium style) have been suggested to M +D and staff has encouraged M +D to integrate such materials into the design. The proponent has stated that in these times of economic recession, the high cost associated with staff suggestions are an absolute deterrent from incorporating the features as suggested. Staff is cognizant of the economic situation and for this reason staff is requesting that the proponent submit a cost comparison of the proposal as submitted compared to the staff recommended design to determine exactly what the cost difference. Amok ITEK Another concern is the size of the spaces as proposed. The existing Conditional Use Permit requires that all lease space maintain a minimum 400 sq. ft. of area. Based on this requirement, the proponent will be required to modify the plans to reflect the CUP requirement. Staff is striving to maintain a sense of consistency throughout the redevelopment area as it relates to aesthetics and in addition would like to maintain consistency with the established conditions of the existing CUP issued to the Marketplace. In its deliberations on the subject matter, the Council in its role as policy- making body, may consider whether in times of economic recession it wishes to be more flexible relative to development standards which are costly. Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that the City either accept the design as submitted, elaborate design, as mentioned by staff. Council direct staff to or to pursue a more lra \25 \mdretail \112591 \0 MMIIL J hUbIUM n w LOREN CARLSON RMCA 0 ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING • 1541 WILSHIRE BLVD SUITE110 LOSANGELES CALIF 90017 (213)483 -0530 FAX(213)483-0533 September 20, 1991 - FILE NO. 7187, R -2 Mr. Kenrick R. Karefa- Johnson Director of Community Development sw 11330 Bullis Rd. Lynwood, CA 90262 iCN �99� RE: PROPOSED ADDITION, THE MARKETPLACE IMPERIAL BLVD. LYNWOOD, CA Dear Kenrick: PRESIDE VICE PRESIDE M + D Management has proposed an addition of perimeter shops to their Lynwood Marketplace Center. We support the concept, and feel it will have a positive result in the overall dimension of their shopping center. Most urban malls have recognized the importance of not turning a blank wall toward the very people that are the focus of their marketing program. VISUAL RETAIL ACTIVITY will draw attention to the fact that The Marketplace truly is a shopping center with many stores to meet the needs of the local shopper. There are many examples of urban centers that have opened their perimeter walls; The Glendale Galeria; 7th Street Marketplace, L. A.; and Stonewood Shopping Center, Downey, are some examples of local centers who have opened their facade to bring shoppers into the mall. Our plans call for small, open air shops to be constructed along the existing walls, while extending the sidewalk along the full length of the building. The shops are designed to architecturally blend with the existing mall building, and will be constructed of metal stud and tectured plaster. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding the proposed addition of perimeter retail shops for M + D Management. Yours truly, RMCA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PLANNING, INC. Paul S. Robich, A.I.A. President PSR /lg c: Mr. Donald Chae 2 DATE: December 2, 1991 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE 0 CITY COUNCIL FROM: Kenrick R. Karefa- Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: REQUEST TO REIMBURSE UTILITY EXPENSES PAID BY M+D FOR THE MONTGOMERY WARD FORMER AUTOMOTIVE CENTER LOCATED AT 3100 E. IMPERIAL HIGHWAY Purpose: That the City Council consider a request for reimbursement of utility fees paid by M +D Properties. Facts: 1. M +D Properties has, since April, 1990, agreed to allow the City of Lynwood rent -free use of the "Automotive Center" for the purpose of housing the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program. 2. M +D has agreed to respect the above - mentioned understanding for the period of April, 1990, through April, 1994. 3. The cost to M +D Properties of the subject arrangement with the City is valued at $7,500.00 monthly (rent payments and property tax). 4. M +D Properties did not agree to pay for the utilities used for the operation of the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program. 5. As illustrated by the attached copies of the utility bill, M +D Properties paid a total of $275,615.63 over the period of April, 1990 through October, 1991. 6. M +D Properties is requesting the following: A) That the City reimburse M +D Properties for utility bills paid from April, 1990 to October, 1991, in the amount of $33,073.87 (the equivalent of 12% of the total bill). B) That the City make arrangements for the payment of all future utility costs generated by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League. Analysis and Conclusions: As M +D Properties allows the City rent -free use of the "Automotive Center" for a period of 48 months, at a total cost to M +D Properties of $360,000.00, it is not by any stretch of the imagination logical to assume that M +D Properties should pay the utility bills, including utility tax, for said property. Given the fact that there is only one consolidated billing, the only issue that must be addressed is the method by which it is determined what portion of the total bill accrue to the building in use by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program. WARM ITEM 0 0 M +D chooses to use sq. ft. floor area ratio between the "Automotive Center" and the total square footage floor area of both buildings, which comes out to be 12 %. In other words, the square footage floor area of the "Automotive Center" is 12% of the total square footage floor area of both buildings. This method is not accurate and staff proposes to utilize a method which more accurately would reflect the actual utility use by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program. Given the facts and the above - mentioned analysis, the request for reimbursement must be considered reasonable. Recommendation: Staff respectfully attached resolution utilities paid for Program. requests that the City Council adopt the approving reimbursement to M +D Properties of the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League Ira \26 \mdprop \112791 \sf RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT TO M +D PROPERTIES OF UTILITIES PAID FOR THE LYNWOOD SHERIFF'S YOUTH ACTIVITY LEAGUE PROGRAM WHEREAS, M +D Properties (Lynwood Marketplace) has allowed the City of Lynwood to use the property at 3100 E. Imperial Highway, known as the "Automotive Center" or Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League Building, free of rent for a period of 48 months, from April, 1990 through April, 1994, for the purpose of the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program; and WHEREAS, M +D Properties has not agreed to pay for the utilities used by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program; and WHEREAS, M+D Properties has, in fact, paid an amount of $33,073.87 for the utilities used by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program over the period of April, 1990 through October, 1991; and paid; WHEREAS, M+D Properties requests reimbursement of utilities NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The reimbursement to M +D Properties of amounts paid for utilities used by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program is fair and is hereby approved. Section 2. The amount of utilities used by the Lynwood Sheriff's Youth Activity League program must be determined by an accurate method to the satisfaction of the City Manager. Section 3. The dollar amount of the reimbursement must not exceed $33,073.87 and may be paid in 6 equal monthly payments of from the General Fund Account, 01 -4555, 4224 and 11 -4552, 4224. 1991. ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Henry Barbosa City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 2nd. day of December, LOUIS J. HEINE, MAYOR CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Kenrick R. Karefa- Johnson Community Development Director lre \26 \mdreso \112791 \sf 0 M & D PROPERTIES A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION of Marketplace 3100 East Imperial Hwy . Lynwood, CA 90262 November 5, 1991 Mr. Kenrick Karefa- Johnson Director of Community Development 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, California 90262 Re: Montgomery Ward Automotive Center Dear Mr. Karefa- Johnson: The M &D properties is very pleased to have been able to provide the use of'the above - reference building, rent free, to the City of Lynwood in M &D's effort to support the continuous programs and activities of the City of Lynwood and its Sheriff Department. As you are well aware, and as mentioned above, M &D donated the use of the building on a rent -free basis. However, M &D did not agree to subsidize the costs of the utilities incurred in the operation of the building. The pro -rata percentage which the building bears to the entire Marketplace of Lynwood is twelve percent(12 %). Therefore, we are requesting that the City of Lynwood reimburse M &D Ear 12% of the utility costs incurred by the Marketplace of Lynwood. To that end, we have indicated below the amount of utility expenses which the Marketplace of Lynwood has incurred and paid for the benefit of the City of Lynwood and the period to which such cost is attributable. Furthermore, we hereby request that the City of Lynwood reimburse M &D for any future utility cost incurred as a result of the operation of the building by the City of Lynwood. The total utility expenses incurred and paid by M &D for the Marketplace of Lynwood is as follows: Time Period Total Utility Expenses April 1990 - October 18, 1991 $275,615.63 The amount of $33,073.87 for which M &D is seeking reimbursement, is equivalent to 12% of the Total Utility Expenses paid by M &D for the entire Marketplace of Lynwood. Tel (213) 631 -4989 . Fax (213) 631 -1645 M & D PROPERTIES A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION of Morkefp /ace 3100 East Imperial Hwy . Lynwood, CA 90262 Mr. Kenrick Karefa- Johnson November 4, 1991 Page 2 Considering the fact that M &D has provided the use of the building on a rent -free basis (which equates to a loss of approximately $7,000.00 per month to M &D) and the fact that M &D is also paying the property tax attributable to the property upon which the building is located, it is evident that M &D has been more than generous in this matter. Based on the cooperative business relationship which M &D, the Marketplace of Lynwood, and the City of Lynwood have shared in the past, we are confident that the City of Lynwood will cooperate and abide by the contents of this letter as soon as possible. If you have any questions or comments regarding the above, please do not hesitate to call. very truly yours, Donald Chae cc:Sheriff Athletic League Board of Director Tel (213) 631 -4989 • Fax (213) 631.1645 N. Current Past dtu f� �- a. Southern California Edison'_ DcAaat^D Ctk� Name and serve 'e a s�—A'� number P.O. Box a ROB' .AD CA 91771 - TZo � Pp �1t7A eeoe... 24-hour billing o ser tt questions MONTGOMERY WARD :i2"2 - "'^"'••' ^•. ••••, S - 1 -90. F3/[C 3100 IMPRIAL NW ;;. '32x,247, •6T4S QI,000.2 CALL (2 ) 6 38 -0178 0, LYNWOOD CA 90262 Meter number l GO% RO A4 --t P0726- 007745 N'� achedul meter reading 14PT2� ?4-1(4 JULY r 1990 Rate schedule Billing Per Date b prepared Previous Char es Ch �- and Credits g � fro previ billing and 0&4 0 (0 G�1eJ17e6 363000 Customer charge Billing demand cha a (84 kW x 56.075) Energy charge: I ock (25200 kWh x 8.7870 d block (14400 kWh x 5.040 Power factor lustment (55 it z 50.30) State enero 9. l lectricity Usage Message (396 kWh x 0.020 4 10925.31 4 10925,31 s8 X 3yt 0 33.45 + 510.30 + - • 2940.08 16.50 7.92 3 40 - �lW -�l /7 = 3yc(yS — OOAbc.Q C44 paid by 0 pay total amount due ► ► ► ► number om1Ce period Meter read to from to 3508.25 F SUS FO-CM OWAe -O C* � 4 e 14433.56 read -r Usage 39600 kWh 26000 kvar 39600 84.0 84.0 55.0 P 007745 os /16/90 06/19/90 00334 00400 600 RP 000829 05/10/90 06/19/90 0000 0145 400 Electricity used In kWh Do- Maximum demand Demand / Billing kW ; ............... Reactive demand .............................. If you have a problem or concern about your electric service, Please let us know. You can call anytime.. day or night.. to get An answer to a service or billing question or to report an outage. Simply call the telephone number shown above. Please return this stub with your pa ment in the envelo provided Do not send cash. Make our chec ppee Pay ent stub b ill if pay men t Is made in person. Tha you . t SC& Bring the entire k yon Your local customer Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► service once ist $ 14433.56 4235 Tweedy BI Enter your payment amount here South Gate Ca 90280 i MONTGOMERY WARD UTILITY SPEC 7 -3 CHICAOO, 11 . ..v l.. f 64 32 247 6345 01 000249 001443356 Your account number , . - °;;• -. , i 1 20000 /oyocy 49 t 350:4. aS 99 �AI Southern California Edison .� P.O. loo ROS ADCA 91771 Name and service address Account number — 24 -hour billin MONTGOMERY WARD g or service questions � "''r ""' "` ° "'•�'••x� 3100 IMPRIAL HW 745-01,1100 -Z, CALL (213) 638 -0178 LYNWOOD CA 90262 Meter number P0 7745 Next scheduled meter reading AUG 17, 19 0 Rate schedule Billing Period Date bill prepare Previous Charges Balance �f om pre previous bill JULY 23 1990 and Credits t .00 ,.. _ LICIT Charges and Credits Customer ch arge Billing demand chuge 168 kW 9.25) Energy charge 1st block a 33.45 456001 h x 7870 Power factor adjustment (99 it + 4006.87 x 50.30 State energy tax (45 Wh x 0.020 + 29.12 Current charges now due ► p y f� ► ► ► Past due if not paid by /13/90 t 5633.14 5187.77 is your aver a daily cost this period. Electricity Usage Meter number ervice Period Meter read from to from Meter read to P0726- 007745 6/19/90 07/19/90 00400 00476 RP0126 -0001♦ 06/19/90 07/19/90 multiplier Usage 600 45600 kWh 0145 0212 Electricit sad kWh Do. 400 26000 kvar / ax dd M imu eman d . Demand Billing kW ReaMir 45600: 168.0 demand , :::::::::: : ::: : :::::::: : ::: _168.0 99.0 Usage Comparison Message Payment stub Your loe n service office is: 423S Tweed 81 - South Gate Ca 90 yo 0 30 4060.0 HOT SUMMER DAYS ARE HERE We reached record temperatures in June! If you used air conditioning or room fans, this bill may be higher. _Dom Mara this stub with o ay i n not send cash. Make your check pay o o aring h e entire _ — bill if Payment is made in person. Thank you. Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► t 5633.14 Enter your payment amount here t MONTGOMERY WARD ,. UTILITY SPEC 7 -3 f ` P.O. BOX 8012 CHICAGO, IL 60680 64 32 247 6345 01 000244 000563314 Your account number ".p' 7•'7 ,•- 20000 S: , 0 0 i I i f&A Southern CalifoOia Edison Name ind servic P.O. Box 8 RO D CA 81771 address Ae number MONTGOMERY HARD X "*"! 7R3 roe- ,) 24-hour bruin •,vice questions 3100 IMPRIAL HN x9L 4�d2'24>r 345 -01 000 -2 CAL (213) 638 -0178 LYNWOOD CA 90262 Meter number P0726 007745 fVext s eduled meter reading 5 T 10, 1990 Rate schedule Billing Period ' - RR- 1 1'L`.�,swar.oarmy • ,- ,,,,,,,,__ D e bill prepared Previous Charges Amount of and Credits Payment re ank you New Charges and Credits Customs chary Billing demand Energy chlrgC + Power factor at State q energy t (Ji 1 Current ch g 9 I Past due if 01 Electricity Usage 240 kW x 59.25) 72000 kWh x 8.7870) 18000 kWh x 5.04p) M kVar x 50.30) ON kWh x 0.020 S how due ► ► ► ► paid by 09/10/90 5340.01 your average dally cost this period. 5633.14 5633.14 .00 -- 5 + 2220.00 ° + 7233.84 + 15.00 + lam 9520.29 aIn kWh ► m ........... 90000 kW .......................... 240.0 .... 240.0 50.0 r r f Message Payment stub . ; our loc af� cu s t om er i) service office is: 4235 Tweedy DI South Cate Ca 90280 Oervice period Meter read Meter re aad from to from to multiplier u sage 8 07/19/90 08/16/90 00476 07/19/90 00626 600 90000 kWh 08/16/90 0212 0259 400 18800 t.. sea days .. rag 32143 29 3600.0 HEAT AND HUMIDITY -- SUMMER BILLS MAY BE HIGHER If You b se an aiconditioner, be keep the ethermosttattlatg78 apment. higher to conserve energy and save money. Please return this stub with your pa ment in the envelopeprasided. — _ — Do not send cash. Make your check y 99 bill ffpayment is made in person. n&n you to SCE. nng the entire Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► 9520.29 Enter your payment amount here 4 MONTGOMERY WARD UTILITY SPEC 7 -3 ti {� :•. . ,c:;P 0 '80)48012 {' yy a 1,:• CHICAGO 'IL 60 686 'tt�ti5.ti rt? F, •,� .:y. . 64 32 247 6345 01 000297 000952029 ,� 'P ;; 20000 Your account numb,, ,, , ,..... -. � ? ski„''; � ° >� ; ,�'• 4r • Name &Ad service oddreas 310 0 0 IMPRIAL A HW LYNWOOD CA 90262 Rate schedule Previous CI and Credits • f �`� Southern California Edison 1. Box 600 ROs "S CA 91771 A number 24 -hour 6illin o g nee questions (E�P'S�llii6lldlR� O1:p00 -Y ( $CALL (213) 6 38 -0178 Meter number F meter :re:ad:ing P0726 007745 199 601(rlg period - e 2I * 1990 AT..... �E Balance ! 9520.29 95 20.29 _ .00 • "' � 1141 geb Customer charge and Credits Billing demand charge 7 Z0 U Energy cha rge: 1st block (8 + 2nd block 4 P factor a justment (6 State energy tax t I Current charges now due Past due If not paid by V Electricity Usage Meter number Rom ee period Meter read Meter read to Rom to multiplier Usage P07 ;!07743 00/16/90 09 /10/90 00626 00034 600 124000 kMh RH0 26-0008 08/16/90 09/10/90 0239 0329 400 20000 kvar Cla.dd -r In K W It ► —�— ! 124800 kW ................. .......... v 276.0 276.0 62.0 Usage Message f / Payment stub service omce is 4235 Tweed yr B South Gate Ca If you have a problem or concern about your electric service, Please let us know. You can CAN anytime .. day or night .. to get An answer to a service or billing question or to report an outage. Simply call the telephone number shown above. Please return this stub with your pa ment In the envelo provided. Do not send rash. Make your check y pe bill NPayment Is made in person. Tha�nfc you SCE. Bring the entire Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► • 12022.46 Enter your payment amount here s;;, ' -A0 INTGONERY WARD 'ILITY, SPEC 7 -3 0 i4 1 490.# 1P, 6a6a0 .'j`' %;�{•.',i 64 12 247 6345 01 000295 001202245 Your account number kW x 59 33.45 0k 8 70) + 2553.00 10 k S0 z 5. �) Y - + 9392.44 kWh x 0.020) + 24.96 0/90 ► ► ► t 12022.45' 5364.32 Is your avera daily cost this period. 781. 3037 - inamcyou 20000 0 0 r- f «Southern alifornia Edison Name and se:na addre 8 os �SEMEAD CA 977 'woeount number 24 -hour billing or service questions MONTGOMERY WARD 64.3 247 - 6345001 077 -0 / 3100 IMPRIAL LYNWOOD CA 902626 2 Meter nnmber CALL (213) 6319 - 01713 P0726- 0 07745 ",cars fCOMWe EOling r 'Daft bill prepared 1i8 -2 1 09 /18 /9n - f nine i.,.. previous "'- ` 3461.5 ` . This Is the duplicate bill you requested. ill prepared payments or charges received alter the "Date b" have not been Included on this bill. please call the telephone number above if we may be of farther assistance. New Charges Cus cl, and Credits ng d and charge + Energy 9 + 14.66 charge 923.02 Power factor adjustment* + 3408.43 a 1 � I State energy tax (45000 kWh x 0.0 �� + + 6.63 9.00 1 IN. Past �� 1J IN. If not paid by )2/19/90 ! 4361.74 *Please Call Edison If you want more billing detail. 5335.52 Is your average daily cost this period. Electricity Usa e g Meter number Service period Meter read Meter read to 6om to multiplier Usage P 007745 09/18/90 10/01/90 00834 00909 600 45000 kWh RP0126- 000829 09/18/90 10/01/90 0329 0354 400 10000 kvar Electricity used in kWh Is Maximum demand 45000 Demand Billing kW . ...... 228.0 Reactive demand .............................. 228.0 51.0 Message ATE. CLOSIN M maLpity this bill wi company Payment stub Your kt customer 4 149TTweedyy BI #A offke Is. South Cate G 90280 ! .00 L * * * 'edit card anytime DDo� not se w Make with c payable to SCE ' ri bM if PaYment is made in penon. Thi the entire — ank you. Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► ! 4361.74 Enter y our payment amou here 4 MONTGOMERY WARD UTILITY SPEC 7 -3 P 0 BOX 8012 CHICAGO IL 60680 64 32 247 6345 01 077017 000436174 20010 Your account number -- "` CHAE, M / CHAE, M 3100 IMPRIAL HW LYNWOOD CA 90262 Rate schedule o GS -2 • _ .,rn�� Southern California Edisor f P.O. Box 800 R OSr $ CA 9177 Accou.......mber 24 -hour billing or ser.ice questions 64-32- 247 - 634 - 0 00 -1 ( T CALL (21 638 -0178 Meter number Next scheduled meter reading P0726- 0077 JAN 2 1, 1991 Billing Period 11/17/90 - 12/18/90 Charges from previous billi Previous Balance S 34685 34685. New Charges Customer charge s 33 and Credits Billing demand charge (540 kW x 52.95) + 1593. Energy charge: 1st block (162000 kWh x 8.8960) + 2nd block (49200 kWh x 5.040) a + 16891 . State energy tax (211200 kWh x 0.020) + 42, Current charges 4 18560. Past due If not paid by 01/15/91 Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► 53245. 5598.72 is your average daily cost this period. Electricity Usage Service period Meter read Meter read Meter number from to from to multiplier Usal ' P0726- 007745 11/17/90 12/18/90 01570 01922 600 211200 k RP012 000829 11/17/90 12/18/90 0 718 0 400 73200 k Electricity used In kWh ► 2111� Maximum demand ...... ' Demand / Billing kW ........................... 54( Usage Comparison current 1 ast 1 kWh used 211200 No Billing days 31 Comparall Daiy average 6812.9 Usage Message I l If you have a problem or concern about your electric service, please let us know. You can call anytime .. day or night .. to get an answer to a service or billlrg questicn or tc repart an i outage. Simply call the telephone number shown above. Please return this stub with your payment In the envelope provided. Do not send cash. Make your check payable to SCE. Bring the I, Payment stub ',-,, entire bill if payment is made in person. Thank you. ' Your local customer .';. Please a tot p al amount due ► ► ► ► $ 53245.35 i service office is: � 4149 Tweedy BI #A Enter our p ayment amount here -171 Y P Y $ /t560 South Gate Ca 90280 CHAE, M /CHAE, M * *CR58 M 8 D MGT 4016 WILSHIRE LOS ANG. CA 90010-3402 64 32 247 6345 02 000193 005324535 20100 �{ Your account number i Date hill prepared '' DEC 27. 1990 I t Name and service address CHAEr M / CHAE, M -3100 IMPRIAL HW LYNWOOD CA 90262 Rate scheduey GS -2 9. , California Edisc P Box 600 FOSEMF CA 91771 Account number 24 -hour billing or sen, -e questions 64 - 32 - 247- 6345 -02 000 -1 T CALL (213) 638 -0178 Meter number P0726- 007745 Billing Period 12/18/90 - 01/18 Next scheduled meter reading FEB 20, 1991 Date bill prepare JAN 93_ rrevious y1arges Charges from previous billing 12/18/90 l and Credits id Previous Balance 1991 $ 18560 S 18560 wstomer charge Billing demand charge* $ 35 Energy charge* + 1780 State energy tax (199800 kWh x 0.020) + 17508 + 39 Current charges Past due if not paid by 02/11/91 19363. Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► $ 3Zq / *Please call Edison if you want more billing detail. 5624.64 is your average daily cost this period. Service period Meter read Meter number from t from Meter read to multiplier Usa, P0726- 007745 12/18/90 01/18/91 01922 02255 600 199800 k RP0126-000829 12/18/90 0 0901 1061 400 64000 k Electricity used in kWh ► 1998 Maximum demand ............................. 5821 I)cmand / Billing kW ........................ .. 5821 Usage Comparison carrent kWh used 199800 La Billing days No Daily average 644532 COUsa 1 Message If you have a problem or concern about your electric service, please let us know. You can call anytime .. day or night .. to get an answer to a service or billing question or to report an outage. Simply call the telephone number shown above. a� W Please return this stub with your payment in the enveloppeyrovided. Do not send cash. Make your check pa able to SCE. Bring the entire Payment stub bill if payment is made in person. Thank you. Your local customer Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► g Z"zq- service office is: ys 4149 Tweedy BI qA Eater your payment amount here South Gate Ca 90280 W 3 0 D/ CHAE, M /CHAE, M * *CR58 M8DMGT 4016 WILSHIRE LOS ANG. CA 90010 -3402 64 32 247 6345 02 000198 003792419 Your eecount number 20000 M 0 5569.31 is your average daily cost excluding city tax. Meter number service period Meter read M1leter read from to from to multiplier Ust P0726.007745 01/16/91 02/20/91 02255 02545 600 174000 L RP0126- 000629 01/16/91 02/20/91 1061 1226 40a 14n "" Message �D 3� r.tectnclty used In kWh ► Nlaximum demand 17400 Demand /Billing kW ....................... 600. Reactive demand , , , , , , . .... • • • • • • ..... 600. 228. days WE ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY TO SERU YOU or If lve =n at the phone number liste� u jVQ or nightt.r c are haPPY iu serve you 24 hours a day! ed 7247 Comparable) — - — . - —— � i r An# 0"s"'I MAPSouthern California and service address Account R.O. Box 600 ROSEtf number Edist ) CA 91771 E, M / CMAE, M A-32 MW 00 I D'CA 24 -hour billing or service 64 -247- 6345 -02 000 -1 CALL questions NWoOD CA 90262 9 �4 (213) M1leter number 638 -0171 e schedule P0726- 007745 Next scheduled meter reading MAR 21, 1991 - G S -2 I7illing Period Date bill prepared evious Charges d Credits 01/18/91 - 02/20/91 Amount of previous bill 01 /18 9`1 MAR 15 1991 Payment received 03/05/91 8 - Thank 19363 you 19363 Balance S New Charges and Credits Customer charge Billing demand charge 36.1 (600 kW x S3.15) + Energy charge: Ist block (174000 kWh x 9.6310) + Power factor adjustment 16757. (228 kVar x 50.30) Lynwood city tax (518752.59 3% + 68. x energy tax (174000 kWh x 0 0 4) + + State 562. Curr 34.� Past e If not paid by 04/03/91 10. ► S 19349.E 5569.31 is your average daily cost excluding city tax. Meter number service period Meter read M1leter read from to from to multiplier Ust P0726.007745 01/16/91 02/20/91 02255 02545 600 174000 L RP0126- 000629 01/16/91 02/20/91 1061 1226 40a 14n "" Message �D 3� r.tectnclty used In kWh ► Nlaximum demand 17400 Demand /Billing kW ....................... 600. Reactive demand , , , , , , . .... • • • • • • ..... 600. 228. days WE ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY TO SERU YOU or If lve =n at the phone number liste� u jVQ or nightt.r c are haPPY iu serve you 24 hours a day! ed 7247 Comparable) — - — . - —— � i r E I �409FSouthern California Edison P.O. Box 600 ROSEMEA k 9 1771 Name service address Account number 24 -hour billing or service questions CHAE, M / CHAE, M 64-32- 247- 63 4 5- 02 000 -1 CALL ( 213) 638 -0178 3100 IMPRIAL HW LYMWOOD CA 90262 Meter number Next scheduled meter reading P0726- 008 133 APR 19, 1991 Rate schedule Billing Period Date bill prepared OS -2 02/20/91 - 03/21/91 MAR 28, 1991 Previous Charges Charges from previous billing 02/20/91 6 19349. and Credits Previous Balance 0 19349 I r New Charges Customer charge 9 36. and Credits Billing demand charge (600 kW x S3.1 + 1890 . Energy charge: 1st block (142200 kWh x 9.6310) + 13695..1 Power factor adjustment (260 War x 50.30) + 7g.1 Lynwood city tax (S 15699.53 x 3 %) + 470, State energy tax (142200 kWh x 0.020) + 28. Current charges 0 16198. Past d ue If n ot pa by 04/1 Please pay total amount due ► ► ► ► 0 35548. 5542.34 Is your average daily cost excluding city tax Electricity Usage Service period Meter read Nicter read Me num fro to from to multiplier Usa; METER CHANCE 02/20/91 02/21/91 02546 02554 600 6400 k" P0726- 006133 02/21/91 03/21/91 0000 0228 600 156800 k' METER CHANGE 02/20/91 02/21/91 1226 1237 400 4400 k RP026 00 02/21 03/ 0000 0143 400 57200 k e O ............... Electricity used in kWh Do- 14221 7J 9 Maximum demand ...................... 600 Demand / Billin kW . ......... . 600 Reactive dcman� .......................... 1 260 Usage Comparison a 200 r Last I kWh used r 4 - 2 No Billing days 29 Comparab Daily average 4903.4 Usage Message WE ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY TO SER1'E YOU If we can be of service to you, please call us. We can be reached at the phone number listed above anytime, day or night ... we are happy to serve you 24 hours a dayl 0 1 PAY TO TH E ORDER M & D PROPERTIES A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 4018 WILSHIRE BLVD. LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 i 1. GCLlSO/i 1293 19 9/ 979 � THE SUM 1 4979 G Is DOLLARS I : 1 ® N ]•] w[!i pvNIK IOULLYUb. LW urtRti G 1tt1 FOR 33 5 02 - 4ArWOC) 3 ' r 1 -3/-,, T ,- d 16 6 ' 9 311' I: L 2 20400901: 00 L 0 L64 58u DEMAND CHARGE TOTAL 91801:10 '- monthly AL 92088:10 (1g am 1`aCE�V�O Slut s All and ?Y)C✓Lck. Z/ ' 4p v /'? , 1 Q9l the CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE o PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION � s SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT MAIL PAYMENT D To P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, to 91771 UA CHAE, M / CHAE, M DBA M 8 D MGM7 3100 IMPERIAL HW�I ��,V�( j[j T LYNHOOD CA 9029'2 RE 64 32 247 6345 02 000192 001497913 1N 20000 914979.13 Your account number /'l' — v �7 CHAS SERVICE ADDRESS 3100 IMP / CHAE, M MH LYNWOOD CAA90262 TYPE OF SERVICE RATE SCH EDULE ELECTRIC iW -8 METER SE RVIC - - NUMBER FROM TO M PERIOD P0726- 008133 RP026 -en�e �„ 04' - 91 05 -2e_e, 540 KH eG �j -mu0 ^ CHARGE TOTAL YOUR ACCOUNT NUMBER Tc CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE' ,a/-`.i SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA KEEP EDISON COpgCOMPANY P.O. BOX 600. ROSEMEAD, CA 9 THIS 1771 PORTION FOR YOUR RECC BII CUSTOMER CHARGE DEMAND C CHARGE TIME P PREVIOUS HIGH DEMAND NON TIME RELATED TIME RELATED - MINTER - ON�PEAK 0 0 KM M K 5 581 KN 05 �j -mu0 ^ CHARGE TOTAL YOUR ACCOUNT NUMBER Tc CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE' ,a/-`.i SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA KEEP EDISON COpgCOMPANY P.O. BOX 600. ROSEMEAD, CA 9 THIS 1771 PORTION FOR YOUR RECC 0 0 I1n`rSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOR PAGE 2 HN 3100 IMPR AL LYNM00= 262 ACCOUNT NO BILLIN INFORMATION ENERGY CHARGE TIME PERIOD - HINUER- ON PEAK MD PEAK OFF PEAK TOTAL ENERGY USAGE POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - WINTER DATE TIME DEMAND RATE 64 -32- 2 47 - 6345 -02 000 -1 AMOUNT $2094:30 3214: 13 225553 $54696 I I I REACTIVE - 273 KVAR X .30 OTHER BILLING CHARGES POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT LNERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- ON PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT _- MID PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- OFF PEAK ELECTRIC REVENUE ADJUSTMENT MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT PUC REIMBURSEMENT FEE LON INCOME SURCHARGE LYN"GGG CITY TAX 3.00 STATE ENERGY TAX CURRENT BILL AMOUNT CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE 1 0 4 w SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY „ t' ; ±:•. COMPTON DISTRICT ,,.. CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 PAGE 2 64 32 247 6345 02 000194 003191740 Your 8CCount number SUBTOTAL FORWARDED RATE 0 KWH X .03150 102036 KW" X .03150 71604 KMH X •03150 173640 KWH ENERGY CHARGE TOTAL w 719864 121942 1 4759 10766 20:84 71:19 4 92: 34 34:73 8 16938:27 THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUB PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION OF PAGE'1 NIT" YOUR PAYMENT i Ll 11 0.0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDisON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECD 5 PAGE 3 3100 IMPRTAL. HN LYNHO'DD CA 90262 BILLING INFORMATION ACCOUNT NO 64 -32- 247 - 6345 -[ 000 -1 AMOUNT CURRENT BILL AMOUNT FORWARDED S16938:27 DATE ADDITIONAL ACCOUNT ACTIVITY ' 04 -19 -91 CHARGES FROM PREVIOUS ELECTRIC BILLING 14979 13 PLEASE PNY THIS AMOUNT NOW DUE 3-40 RECENT PAYMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN DEDUCTED FROM 7HI5 BIII ENERGY USAGE COMPARISON /0 93 F a f BILLING PERIOD KNH USAGE GAYS DAILY AVERAGE CURRENT BILL i 173640 LAST YEAR 31 5601.3 KNH NO COMPARABLE USAGE E ANDWILLUCONTINUE TOCSTRIVERTO PROVIDE QUALITY SERVICE /or� �,/ �� SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUB. COMPTON DISTRICT,. PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION OF PAGE 1 WITH YOUR PAYMENT : CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 PAGE 3 L4 32 247 L345 02 000194 003191740 1 I Your account number I • • G 00 1 CHARGE TOTAL $7922:447 � 1 SUBTOTAL $8201x:47 �rr9,56.0 _ ybr r1' .2:L. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE I r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J-t� I - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION I' r COMPTON DISTRICT „y MAIL PAYMENT TO P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91773 / * *CR17 PLEASE CHAE, M / CHAE, M PAY THIS DBA M 8 D MGMT AMOUNT 3100 IMPERIAL HWY NOW DUE LYNWOOD CA 90262 64 32 247 6345 02 000196 005437890 20000 $0 Your account number (30399.77 r =1 1 S OUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA FOR YOUR RECOR 91771 SERVICE ADDRESS CHAE, M / CHAE, M FOR BUSINESS OFFICE CALL YOUR ACCOUNT 3100 IMPRIAL HW IAIMBER IS LYNHDOD CA 90262 213- 638 -0178 64 -32 -247- 6345 -02 TYPE OF 000 -1 SERVICE SCHEDULE BILLING DAYS AVERAiDAILY DATE BILL ELECTRIC TOU -8 PREPARED 30 $726.94 06 -20 -91 METER SERVICE PERIOD NUMBER FROM METER R ADING METER READ ' Tp FROM TO MULTIPLIER ENERGY USAGE RP026- 002859 05-20-91 600 06 -19 -91 � 0512.0 0695.0 400 163200 KWH BILLING INFORMATION 73200 KVAR CUSTOMER CHARGE AMOUNT TOTAL 6287:00 DEMAND CHARGE TIME PREVIOUS CURR €NT PEAK BILLING PEA 00 HIGH DEMANp DATE I TIME DEMAND KH RATE NON TIME RELATED TIME RELATED 625 X , 2.79908 1749:43 _SL"4ER- ON PEAK 0 KH 06 -11 -91 MID PEAK 583 KH 06 -11 -91 1645 -1700 618 X 1815 -1830 8.61333 5323:04 OFF PEAK 06 -08 -91 540 KH 625 X 1700 -1715 1.36000 8 5 0 :0 G + 509 X .00000 -MINTER - ON PEAK 0 KH 00 -00 -00 MID PEAK 583 KH 05 -24 -91 0000 -0000 •00000 OFF PEAK 540 KH 05 -25 -91 IBIS- 1830 485 X 1315 -1330 •00000 457 X .00000 � HAND 00 1 CHARGE TOTAL $7922:447 � 1 SUBTOTAL $8201x:47 �rr9,56.0 _ ybr r1' .2:L. CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE I r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J-t� I - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION I' r COMPTON DISTRICT „y MAIL PAYMENT TO P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91773 / * *CR17 PLEASE CHAE, M / CHAE, M PAY THIS DBA M 8 D MGMT AMOUNT 3100 IMPERIAL HWY NOW DUE LYNWOOD CA 90262 64 32 247 6345 02 000196 005437890 20000 $0 Your account number (30399.77 - • _, 1n G SouT HERN CALIFORNIA F•r »• " •' ^•• ,e 3100 IMPRIAL HM LYN OOD CA 90262 F dIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOR[ PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO 64 - 32- 247- 6345 -02 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION OTHER BILLING CHARGES SUBTOTAL FORWARDED ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- ON PEAK �. .• ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- MID PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- OFF PEAK ELECTRIC REVENUE .ADJUSTMENT MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT PLC REIMBURSEMENT FEE LOW INCOME SURCHARGE AVERAGE RATE LIMITER LYNWOOD CITY TAX 3.00 STATE ENERGY TAX S CURRENT BILL AMOUNT DATE A A CC O U N T A C T IVIT Y 05 -20 -93 1 CHARG S FROM PREVIOUS ELECTRIC BILLING PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT NOW DUE RECENT PAYMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN DEDUCTED FROM THIS BILL ENERGY USAGE COMPARISON KHM USAGE DAYS 163200 30 0 COMPARABLE USAGE AM 613426 33 2557;97 444355 109970 13872 10118 1958 6691 78:35CF 65327 3264 62246150 3191740 654378.90 DAILY AVERAGE 5440.0 KWH AND WILL TO PROVIDE QUALITY SERVICE BILLING PERIOD CURRENT BILL LAST YEAR 0 • • J�4m SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOR: PAGE 2 3100 IMPRIA HK LYNWOOD CA 90262 BILLING INFORMATION ENERGY CHARGE SUBTOTAL. FORWARDED TIME PERIOD ENERGY USAGE RATE -SUMMER - ON PEAK MID PEAK 31066 KWH X .03150 OFF PEAK 29213 KHH X .03150 36836 KHH X .03150 - WlNTER- ON PEAK MID PEAK 0 KWH X .03150 OFF PEAK 38347 KHH X .03150 27738 KHN X .03150 TOTAL 163200 KHH ENERGY CHARGE TOTAL POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - SUMMER DATE TIME DEMAND RATE REACTIVE - 283 KVAR X .30 X 17/30' POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - WINTER DATE TIME DEMAND RATE REACTIVE - 21S KVAR X .30 X 13/30 POKER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT SUBTOTAL CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE mj #PN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT , ! % l'I CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 PAGE 2 64 32 247 6345 02 000196 OOS437890 'Four account number $13426:33 THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUB' PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTIOP OF PAGE 1 KITH YOUR PAYMENT ACCOUNT NO 6 4 - 32 -247- 6345 -02 000 -1 — $8209!47 97858 920 21 116033 120 7: 93 873: S51 : : : i 1 0 76: 06 • 0 r I L m SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOF P.O, BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 SERVICE ADDRESS FOR BUSINESS CHAE, M' CHAE, M OFFICE CALL 3100 IMPRIAL HW LYMDg00 CA 90262 213- 638 -0178 TYPE OF RATE SERVICE SCHEDULE BILLING AVERAGE DAILY DAYS COST ELECTRIC TOU -8 30 0848,75 METER SERVICE PERIOD R ADINO METER NUMBER FROM TO METER TO METER READ MULTIPLIER P0726- 008133 06 -19 -91 07 -19 -91 1038.0 1333.0 RP 002859 06 -19 -91 07 -19 -91 0695.0 0906.0 600 400 BILLING INFORMATION CUSTOMER CHARGE TOTAL DEMAND CHARGE TIME PREVIOUS CURR €NT PEAK PERIOD HIGH DEMAND DA BILLING B I TIME DEMAND KW RATE - NON TIME RELATED ;TIME RELATED 501 X 3.10000 - SUMMER- ON PEAK 618 KH 07 -03 -91 1 230 -1245 496 X 1 5.20000 MID PEAK 625 KH 07 -03 -91 1145 -1200 OFF PEAK 540 KH 06 -29 -91 1630 -1645 495 x 2.40000 sot x .00aoo DEMAND CHARGE TOTAL SUBTOTAL 1 RECEIVED AUG 7 1991 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE r' YOUR ACCOUNT NUMBER IS 64 -32 - 247- 6345 -0 000 -1 DATE BILL PREPARED 08 -02 -91 ENERGY USAGE � 177000 KHH 84400 KVAR AMOUNT $2 �_ 1553' 10 7539'20 1188 :00 810280 30 67!30 J ' //�� Q��SOUTNERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORD PAGE 2 3100 IMPRIAL RH LYNKOOD CA 90262 ENERGY CHARGE TIME PERIOD - SLPMER- ON PEAK MID PEAK OFF PEAK ACCOUNT NO 64 -32- 247- 6345 -02 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT SUBTOTAL FORWARDED 61056730 ENERG USAGE RATE TOTAL POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - SUMMER DATE TIME DEMAND REACTIVE - THER BILLING CHARGES ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- ON PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- MID PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- OFF PEAK ELECTRIC REVENUE ADJUSTMENT MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT PLC REIMBURSEMENT FEE LON INCOME SURCHARGE LYNWOOD CITY TAX 3.00 7 STATE ENERGY TAX 4644'88 302623 118747 150;45 10974 2124 7257 76281 I 3540 RRENT BILL AMOUNT 62622529 RE��O p �62f 1991 ,,•,, ON THE NEXT PAGE 56411 KHH X .03150 17 7 6 9 5 50861 KHH X , 03150 16 0 2 12 69728 KKK X .03150 219643 177000 KKK ENERGY CHARGE TOTAL $5575:50 RATE 239 KVAR X .30 �• POKER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT 671'70 Ll J�c� SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORI PAGE 3 3100 IMPRIAL HH ACCOUNT NO 64 -32- 247 - 6345 -02 LYNWOOD CA 90262 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT CURRENT BILL AMOUNT FORWARDED $2622529 DATE ADDITIONAL ACCOUNT ACTIVITY 06 -19 -91 CHARGES FROM PREVIOUS ELECTRIC BILLING 2246150 I PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT NOW DU RECENT PAYMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN DEDUCTED FROM THIS BILL ENERGY USAGE COMPARISON �T 648686:79 BILLING PERIOD KWH USAGE DAYS DAILY AVERAGE CURRENT BILL 177000 30 5900.0 KNH LAST YEAR NO COMPARABLE USAGE WE VALUE YOU AS A CUSTOMER AND WILL CONTINUE TO STRIVE TO PROVIDE QUALITY SERVICE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I J-C- � SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUB COMPTON DISTRICT URN THE BOTTOM PORTIO PLEASE RETURN f OF-PAGE 1 WITH YOUR PAYMENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 PAGE 3 64 32 247 6345 02 000194 004866679 Your account number ! r` � SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA E ON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORD: P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 I CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i r awiC7 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT CHAE,M /CHAE,M 11 11 DBA M & D MGMT 3100 IMPERIAL HWY LYNWOOD CA 90262 64 32 247 6345 02 000198 007772836 account number PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTI MAIL PAYMENT TO P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 917 PLEASE I * *CR17 PAY THIS AMOUNTI NOW DUE 20000 077728.3 I I FOR BUSINESS YOUR ACCOUNT SERVICE ADDRESS CHAE,M /CHAE,M 11 11 OFFICE CALL NUMBER IS 3100 IMPRIAL HN 213 - 638 -0178 64 -32- 247 - 6345 -02 LYNHOOD CA 90262 000 -1 TYPE OF RATE BILLING AVERAGE DAILY DATE BILL SERVICE SCHEDULE DAYS COST PREPARED ELECTRIC I TOU -8 I 31 I •909.42 08 -20 -91 METER SERVICE PERIOD METER R ADING METER READ NUMBER FROM TO FROM TO MULTIPLIER ENERGY USAGE P0726- 008133 07 -19 -91 08 -19 -91 1333.0 1639.0 600 183600 KHH RP026- 002859 07 -19 -91 08 -19 -91 0906.0 1121.0 400 86000 KVAR BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT CUSTOMER CHARGE TOTAL $287:00 DEMAND CHARGE TIME PREVIOUS CURR NT PEAK BILLING PERIOD HIGH DEMAND DATE TIME DEMAND KN RATE NON TIME RELATED 606 X 3.10000 187860 TIME RELATED - SUMMER - ON PEAK 618 KH 08 -14 -91 1430 -1445 606 X 15.20000 92 1 12 0 MID PEAK 625 KN 08 -16 -91 1030 -1045 699 X 2.40000 143 7:6 0 OFF PEAK 540 KM 08 -17 -91 1115 -1130 595 X .00000 012527: DEMAND CHARGE TOTAL 612 8 - 1 - 4 40,.. 40 2UBTD.TAL • I CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -i r awiC7 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT CHAE,M /CHAE,M 11 11 DBA M & D MGMT 3100 IMPERIAL HWY LYNWOOD CA 90262 64 32 247 6345 02 000198 007772836 account number PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTI MAIL PAYMENT TO P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 917 PLEASE I * *CR17 PAY THIS AMOUNTI NOW DUE 20000 077728.3 I I 1' G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECD PAGE 2 'A 3100 IMPRIAL HN LYNHDOD CA 90262 BILLIN INFORMATION ENERGY CHARGE TIME PERIOD 'SUMER- ON PEAK MID PEAK OFF PEAK TOTAL ACCOUNT NO 64 -32 -247- 6345 -C 000 -1 AM OUNT SUBTOTAL FORNARDED r POWER FACTOR ADJ )ATE TIME i OTHER BILLING CHARGES ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT __ ON PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -_ MID PEAK ENERGY 4847736 4 ENERGY USAGE MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT 1268765 PUC REIMBURSEMENT FEE RATE LOW INCOME SURCHARGE 113:8 3 58870 KHH x .03150 50235 185441 KNM X .03150 74495 KNH X .03150 158240 183600 KNH 2346759 ENERGY CHARGE TOTAL $5783740 VT - SUMMER DEMAND RATE ' REACTIVE - 284 KVAR X .30 , POKER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT 085:20 POWER FACTOR ADJ )ATE TIME i OTHER BILLING CHARGES ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT __ ON PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -_ MID PEAK ENERGY 4847736 COST ADJUSTMENT -- OFF PEAK ELECTRIC REVENUE ADJUSTMENT 2988798 MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT 1268765 PUC REIMBURSEMENT FEE 15670 6 LOW INCOME SURCHARGE 113:8 3 LYNWOOD CITY TAX 3.00 Y STATE ENERGY TAX 22703 75728 8 4 4:6 6 367 72 CURRENT BILL 629036:57 CONTINUED ON THE NEXSk: �!�\ v�1a ` i�"A>;E N 0 fCo SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORI PAGE 3 3100 IMPRIAL HN ACCOUNT NO 64 -32- 247- 6345 -02 LYNHOOD CA 90262 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT //' ^ l //9 CURRENT BILL AMOUNT FORHARDED 629036 DATE ADDITIONAL ACCOUNT i RETURNED CHECK CHARGE 07 -19 -91 CHARGES FROM PREVIOUS ELECTRIC BILLING a6 xxs.'� Bi,C2 ��9- 8 /y 29031.s� EIVITY 5.0 48686 79 Ck� / /fy< 8 /yt 55, �,6�. 86 P LEA SE PA T HIS AMO NOW DUE eJ' RECENT PAYMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN DEDUCTED FROM THIS BILL -� ENERGY USAGE COMPARISON BIL LING PERIOD KNH USAGE DAYS DAILY AVERAGE CURRENT BILL 183600 31 5922.6 MH LAST YEAR NO COMPARABLE USAGE WE VALUE YOU AS A CUSTOMER AND WILL CONTINUE TO STRIVE TO PROVIDE QUALITY SERVICE _ / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 PAGE 3 64 32 247 6345 02 000L98 007772836 THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUE� PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTIOi OF PAGE 1 KITH YOUR PAYMENT i Your account number ../nm SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECD CHAEIM /CNAE,M 11 SER ADDRESS YOUR ACCOUNT 3100 IMPRIAL HH NUMBER IS LYNHOOD CA 90262 64 -32 -24 )- 6345 -G TYPE OF RATE 000 -1 SERVICE SCHEDULE BILLING COST DAYS ELECTRIC ' TOU -8 09 -19 -91 30 METER SERVICE PERIOD NUMBER FROM METER R ADING TO FROM TO P0726- 008133 08 -19 -91 09 -I8 -91 RP026- 002859 09-19 -91 0 1639. 1912.0 09 -18 -91 1121.0 1913.0 BILLING INFORMATION CUSTOMER CHARGE DEMAND CHARGE TIME PER OD HIGH DATEURR €NT PEAK TIME NON TIME RELATED TIME RELATED - SUMMER - ON PEAK 618 KH 08 -22 -91 1715 -1730 MID PEAK 625 KH 08 -21 -91 1115 -1130 OFF PEAK b9b KH 08 -31 -91 1900 -1916 USINESS E CALL YOUR ACCOUNT P213-638-0178 NUMBER IS 64 -32 -24 )- 6345 -G 000 -1 AVERAGE DAILY DATE BILL COST PREPARED 6877.62 09 -19 -91 METER READ MULT 600 400 TOTAL BILLING DEMAND KH RATE - 610 X 3.10000 610 X 1 5.20000 600 X 2.40000 535 X .00000 DEMAND CHARGE TOTAL SUBTOTAL c�,VEO Apt ��9U CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE ENERGY USAGE 163800 KHH 76800 KVAR AMOUNT *287:00 I 189100 9272: 00 1440;00 6 1260300 412 -- - - - --- - - - -- - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - �I I 1 f s SOUTRERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOR PAGE 2 - CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE �.� THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STU] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY J v COMPTON,DISTRICT PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTICI OF.PAGE 1 WITH YOUR PAYMENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 PAGE 2 64 32 247 6345 02 000199 005457768 Your account number 3100 IMPRIAL HH LYNMOOD CA 90262 ACCOUNT NO 64 -32- 247 - 6345 -0. 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT ENERGY CHARGE SUBTOTAL FORKARDED 61289000 TIME PERI00 ENERGY USAGE RATE - SUt@fER- ON PEAK MID PEAK 57268 KHH X .03150 18 0 3: 94 OFF PEAK 46280 KKH X .03150 145782 60252 KNH X .03150 18 9 7 94 TOTAL 16380 KMH $ 5 15 9 7 0 ENERGY CHARGE TOTAL POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - SUMMER i DATE TINE DEMAND RATE REACTIVE - 286 KVAR X .30 POKER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT 5 85: 80 OTHER BILLING CHARGES 4 7 1 5 45 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- ON PEAK ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- MID PEAK 2 753 ' 6 6 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- OFF PEAK 1 0 2 6 0 9 9 ELECTRIC REVENUE ADJUSTMENT 1 3 9 : 2 MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT 101-56 PUC REIMBURSEMENT FEE 1 9: 6 6 LON INCOME SURCHARGE 6 71 16 AVERAGE RATE LIMITER 6 6 2 : 51 C LYN4000 CITY TAX 3.00 Y 7 8 8: 8 7 STATE ENERGY TAX 3276 CURRENT BILL AMOUNT 6 2 7 1 1 7: 4 3 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE �.� THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STU] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY J v COMPTON,DISTRICT PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTICI OF.PAGE 1 WITH YOUR PAYMENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 PAGE 2 64 32 247 6345 02 000199 005457768 Your account number 0 i ../ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOR PAGE 3 , 3100 IMPRIAL HM LYNMOOD CA 90262 ACCOUNT NO 64- 32- 247 - 6345 -0E 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT CURRENT BILL AMOUNT FORHARDED 62711743 i DATE ADDITIONAL ACCOUNT ACTIVITY 08 -19 -91 CHARGES FROM PREVIOUS ELECTRIC BILLING 0:2 5 PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT NOW DUE 65457768 �e RECENT PAYMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN DEDUCTED FROM THIS BILL -� ENERGY USAGE COMPARISON BILLING PERIOD KHM USAGE DAYS DAILY AVERAGE CURRENT BILL 163800 30 5460.0 KHM LAST YEAR NO COMPARABLE USAGE AND TO C AND PROVIDE QUALITY SERVICE N THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUB ,0 o SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTIOII OF PAGE 1 NITM YOUR PAYMENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 PAGE 3 64 32 247 6345 02 000199 005457768 Your account number t; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORE P.O. BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 DEMAND CHARGE TOTAL 68110172 SUBTOTAL 88397172 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE --- - - - -- - - - - - - - RECEIVED --- y- 1 °gi -- meoml►3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT CHAE,M/CHAE,M 11 11 M 8 D MOMT /MKT PL 3100 E IMPERIAL HWY LYNWOOD CA 90262 L4 32 247 L345 02 000190 005105110 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTI01 MAIL PAYMENT TO P -O- BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 7AN P N 10000 s seas -l-r a� Your account number SERVICE ADDRESS FOR BUISINESS YOUR ACCOUNT CHAE,M /CHAE,M 11 11 OFFICE CALL NUMBER IS 213 -6315-0178 64 -32- 247 - 6345 -02 3100 IMPRIA HN LYNHOOD CA 90262 000 -1 TYPE OF SERVICE RATE SCHEDULE BILLING AVERAGE DAILY DATE BILL DAYS COST PREPARED ELECTRIC TOU -B 30 $774.59 10 -21 -91 METER SERVICE PERIOD METER R ADINO METER READ ' NUMBER FROM TO FROM TO MULTIPLIER ENERGY USAGE P0726- 008133 09 -18 -91 10 -18 -91 1912.0 2195.0 600 169800 KWH RP026- 002859 09 -18 -91 10 -18 -91 1313.0 1520.0 400 82800 KVAR BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT CUSTOMER CHARGE TOTAL 828700 DEMAND CHARGE TIME PREVIOUS CURR HT PEAK BILLING PERIOD HIGH DEMAND DATE TIME DEMAND KN RATE ; ; NON TIME -- RELATED TIME RELATED 616 X 3.02753 186 4 9 6 -SUMMER - ON PEAK 618 KH 09 -23 -91 1630 -1645 592 X 9.12000 5 3 9 910 4 MID PEAK 623 KH 09 -23 -91 1845- 1900 588 X 1.44000 8 617 2 OFF PEAK 595 KH 10 -05 -91 1500- 1515 580 X .00000 -HINTER - ON PEAK 618 KH 00 -00 -00 0000 -0000 0 X .00000 MID PEAK 625 KH 30 -09 -91 1830 -1845 616 X .00000 OFF PEAK 595 KH 10 -13 -91 1545- 1600 584 X .00000 1 DEMAND CHARGE TOTAL 68110172 SUBTOTAL 88397172 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE --- - - - -- - - - - - - - RECEIVED --- y- 1 °gi -- meoml►3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT CHAE,M/CHAE,M 11 11 M 8 D MOMT /MKT PL 3100 E IMPERIAL HWY LYNWOOD CA 90262 L4 32 247 L345 02 000190 005105110 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTI01 MAIL PAYMENT TO P -O- BOX 600, ROSEMEAD, CA 91771 7AN P N 10000 s seas -l-r a� Your account number ��4 04FSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORI PAGE 3 CURRENT BILL AMOUNT BATE I ADDITIONAL ACCOUNT ACTIVITY 09 -1a -91 I CHARGES FROM PREVIOUS ELECTRIC BILLING PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT NOW DUE RECENT PAYMENTS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN DEOIXTED FROM THIS BILL ENERGY USAGE COMPARISON 523933196 27117114 551051110 B PERIOD KMH USAGE DAYS DAILY AVERAGE CURRENT BILL 169800 30 6660.0 KHH LAST YEAR NO COMPARABLE USAGE WE VALUE YOU AS A CUSTOMER AND WILL CONTINUE TO STRIVE TO PROVIDE QUALITY SERVICE i ��C � ° O SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUB COMPTON DISTRICT PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTIOr� OF PAGE 1 WITH YOUR PAYMENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 PAGE 3 L4 32 247 L345 02 000190 005105110 3100 IMPRIAL HN ACCOUNT NO 64 -32- 247 - 6345 -02 LYN OOD CA 90262 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT OTHER BILLING CHARGES SUBTOTAL FORWARDED 51383439 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- ON PEAKS 3170101 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- MID PEAK 5136193 ENERGY COST ADJUSTMENT -- OFF PEAK 918: 8 2 _ ELECTRIC REVENUE ADJUSTMENT 14 413 3 MAJOR ADDITIONS ADJUSTMENT 105128 PUC REIMBURSEMENT FEE 2 013 8 LOH INCOME SURCHARGE 6 91 6 2 AVERAGE RATE LIMITER 195188Cf LYNWOOD CITY TAX 3.00 % 696112 STATE ENERGY TAX Your account number f'fr S OUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECOR. PAGE 2 3100 IMPRIAL HN LYNWOOD CA 90262 ACCOUNT NO 64 -32 -247- 6345 -02 000 -1 BILLING INFORMATION AMOUNT ENERGY CHARGE SUBTOTAL FORNARDED 68397:72 TIME PERIOD ENERGY USAGE RATE ' - SUMIER- ON PEAK 38499 KMH X .03150 MID PEAK 1212: 7 2 28957 KMH X .03150 OFF PEAK 912: 15 33678 KMH X .03150 1060:86 -WINTER - ON PEAK 0 KHH X .03150 MID PEAK 48391 KHN X .03150 OFF PEAK 1524:32 20275 KWH X .03150 6 38: 6 6 TOTAL 169800 KHH 6 5 3 4 8: 7 1 ENERGY CHARGE TOTAL POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - SUMMER ; DATE TIME DEMAND RATE REACTIVE - 286 KVAR X .30 X 18/30 POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT - WINTER ' DATE TIME DEMAND RATE REACTIVE - 304 KVAR X .30 X 12/30 POWER FACTOR ADJUSTMENT I $ 8 7: 96 SUBTOTAL I 413834 3 9 CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� PP° THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT STUBI ��o- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMPTON DISTRICT PLEASE RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTIO1 OF PAGE 1 KITH YOUR PAYMENT CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 PAGE 2 L4 32 247 L345 02 000190 005105110 Your account number DATE: December 2, 1991 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Kenrick Karefa- Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. ZOA 10 Planned Residential Development Zone, City Wide. Purpose The Staff is proposing to amend Section 25 -4.8 (c) of Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to Planned Residential Development zones. The ordinance proposes to reduce the minimum area for inclusion in a P -R -D zone from five (5) acres to one (1) acre for new residential development. Facts 1. A recent land use analysis of residential development in the City of Lynwood shows that there are no sites five (5) acres or more in size that can utilize the section for P -R -D zones. 2. It is the intent of this proposed amendment to reduce the minimum area for inclusion in a P -R -D zone to increase the possibility for single family residential development. 3. The application of the current ordinance on P -R -D zones is no longer practical as the City of Lynwood is at a stage of maximum build out. 4. At its regularly scheduled meeting of November 13, the City Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amendment. 5. At its regularly scheduled meetings of December 4, 1990, and February 5, and March 19, 1991, the City Council continued this item to further study the proposal. 6. At its regularly scheduled meeting of March 16, the City Council requested that staff research the maximum capacity in residential development as it relates to water consumption and sewer generation. Issues and Analysis This ordinance amendment is a city -wide land use instrument to promote single family development and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan, and with the Land Use Element as it relates to the increase of area for single family residential development. The plan calls for replacement of single family homes, eliminated by the construction of the Glen Anderson, 1 105 freeway. 1 ' AGUM ITEM live. The General Plan land use survey of residentially designated vacant land, indicates that of the total 81 acres, 26% is designated single family, 48% is designated Townhouse and Cluster Housing and 26% is designated Multi- Family Residential. Further, none of the existing vacant residential land has the equivalent of (5) five acres as required by Section 25 -4.8 of the P -R -D zone. (see attachment No. 1 for more detail). Because the P -R -D zone is an overlay zone which can be utilized in all residential zones, adoption of the proposed amendment will increase the land use instruments to realize the development of single family housing in the R -1 (Single Family) R -2 (Two - Family), and R -3 (Multi - Family) residential zones and will also decrease opportunities for Multi- Family residential development. It is furthermore note worthy to recognize that this proposed ordinance amendment will only increase the residential density in the R -1 (Single Family) zone. At this point, staff does not know what the impact of the proposed ordinance amendment will be on the water capacity and sewer generation. These issues could be addressed at the time the residential development proposals are received. Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the City Council approve the findings in Resolution No. 2352, waive the reading and introduce the proposed ordinance. Attachments 1. City Planning Commission Resolution No. 2352 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 10 disk78: nd • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONE. The City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby find, resolve and determine as follows: Section 1 Chapter 25, Section 25 -4.8, of the Lynwood Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 25 -4.8 Development Standards For Planned Residential Development Zones 25 -4.8a Amend Section 25 -4.8a to read a. Intent This zone is intended to provide for flexibility and creativity in the design of large scale planned residential development. This District is also intended to provide for the development or redevelopment of parcels of land as coordinated projects involving single family homes, community facilities both public and private, and related accessory commercial uses. The P -R -D zone is further intended to provide for the optimum integrating of natural and man -made amenities within residential development. 25 -4.8b Delete part of Section 25- 4.8b(2) Delete multiple dwellings containing not more than two units, including duplex mobile homes, certified by the same procedure as single family dwellings. Multiple dwelling containing more than two (2) units. 25 -4.8c. Amended to read as follows: Minimum Area Minimum area for inclusion in a P -R -D zone shall be one (1) acre, except that sites with lesser area may be permitted when they are contiguous to an existing planned residential development and allow for a logical extension in arrangement of buildings, facilities and open space. 25 -4.8d (3) Amended to read as follows: Development Standards Minimum Lot Size There shall be 3500 square feet minimum for individual lots. 1 25 -4.8d (12) Amend to read as follows: Dwelling Size No dwelling unit shall have less total floor area, as determined by the outside dimensions of the structure excluding porches, garages and similar areas, than as follows: Minimum Unit Size, 1,000 square feet 2 or 3 bedroom plus 120 square feet per bedroom when more than 3 bedrooms 25 -4.8d (14) Amended to read as follows: Off - street Parking Off - street parking shall be provided per residential unit as follows: Two bedrooms (or more) 2 spaces In all cases at least one (1) parking space shall be provided on -site. In addition to the above requirements there shall be at least three (3) uncovered visitor parking spaces for each ten (10) units in the development and at least one (1) recreational vehicle parking space for each ten (10) units in the development. Parking for accessory commercial uses shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) space for each two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area. 254.8d (16) Delete in its entirety. Walls Adiacent To Single - Family uses Section 2 . SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection subdivision, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof, to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or it application to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. disk79:ordimrice (5) ® 0 City o LYNWOOD �-A City Aming NdVeeges 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD. CALIFORNIA 90262 (213) 603 -0220 DATE: Deomlber 3, 1991 TO: Honorable Mayor and 0ounci lmembers FROM: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk SUBJECT: M A D Properties At Councils Special Meeting of November 21, 1991, Council approved the permit for a Carnival at the Marketplace for November 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30th and 1st of December. The attached letter from M & D Properties (Second half of request) is requesting to have a fund raising activity December 15, 1991. Council review and direct staff accordingly. AGMA ITEM I`'ll'I 1 � M & D PROPERTIES A CALIFORNIA CORPORATKNJ of Montefpbce 3100 Eosl hvedol MNy • Ly wiood, CA 90262 November 13, 1991 � 1 City of Lynwood CRP, Director Mr. Kenrick Kareffa Johnson 1130 Bullis Rd. Lynwood, Ca. 90262 Re: Request for a permit for a fund raising activity with FM 98 radio station on December 15, 1991 at The Marketplace Barking lot. And a permit for a carnival on November 22,23,24,28,29, 30 at The Marketplace Parking lot. Dear Kenrick: As I have mentioned to you yesterday, I need a written approval letter for the fund raising activity that I am going to have on December 15, 1991 for the needed family. According to FM 98 radio station, if you can allow to have a beer concession, they are willig to give 50% of proceeds to the City of Lynwood and 50% to needed family. With last 13 months of good track records with all the events that we had at The Marketplace of Lynwood, without any problem whatsoever, I can assure you that this fund raising activity will give good amount of publicity to the City of Lynwood and without any problem. And I will be very much thankful if you can give kind approval to support this kind of positive fund raising activity by major hispanic radio station to be held in the City of Lynwood. Also, too, I am requesting a permit for a carnival for November 22,23,24,29,30, and 1st of December. I know it is a short notice. However, I promise you that it will be different from next year. Kenrick knowing the business is suffering in this bad recession time, the Marketplace of Lynwood needs you and The City of Lynwood's support to fight this bad economy. Plese extend you and The City of Lynwood ' s kind support and help as usual. With many thanks for your anticipated support, • , • r. Tel (213) 631 -4989 • Fox (213) 631.1645