HomeMy Public PortalAboutPCM 1986-02-24WORKSHOP SESSION
PLANNING COMMISSION ~` Maryvale reps.
Feb. 24, 1986
Commission present were Jay Jensen, Chairman, C.B. Jensen,
Marianne Klancke, Joanne Yankovich, Sue Buchheister.
Maryvale represented by Planner Ralph Martin, and Attorney Jim
Soran.
Ed Opitz and Fred Fox were present as well as several interested
parties.
Martin asked to review the submittals.
Martin stated for the record that Maryvale would not be the developer
of this project. The approvals at PDD preliminary should be with
enough controls that a developer would know exactly what is expected
by this town. It is there hope to find a community planner
to design and bring in developers under the plan but that is not
a known at this time. Board expressed concern that the possibility
of so many developers could be a managing problem for this commission
in making sure all aspects of the PDD was complied with, and making
all of these people aware of there responsibility as far as
infracture work. Martin hopes that the community planner would
be retained to monitor future developers and possibly put the
infracture in place before dealing with the developers. Board
stated that in the annexation agreement an approved preliminary
plan for sewer and water as well a drainage and grading would
be conditioned 'on approving any subdivision. Martin expressed
that a solution to some of the problems with what is represented
here and what could actually be developed could be accomplished'
and - controlled with a statement describing each pod with
guidelines as to heights, setbacks, stepping of buildings, view,
etc. then a developer would have an exact idea of the restraints
of the property. Martin instructed to do this work, to be part
of the approvals on record.
The marketing plan was discussed at length.
The percentage of slope development that would be allowed was
discussed.
Ken Wright was introduced as the engineer for Maryvale with regards
to water and sewer. ~Mr. Wright reviewed the extent of the work
done to date on the v,~ater supply etc.
1983. Engineer m~t with the Army Corp. of Engineers on site
to review a 404 ermit that would be needed in the wetlands
to accomodate the golf course design. '
1983-1984- 2 dee~l~ wells were drilled approx. 500' to 700'
and preliminary tests should good flows expected.
1985- misc. fili~gs
augumentation p an
Mr. Wright also repoi^ted
600 taps for Maryval~.
i
were filed with the water court and an
is being worked out for filing this year.
that Grand County San. Dist. had reserved
C.B. asked that with the information he had, did Mary'vale have
enough water to serve the proposed development. Wright stated
that legally he felt they did and physically it looked like
a good possibility.
C.B. also wanted Maryvale to know that the Town was filing an
objection to the filings that had been done to date for a number
of reasons but felt -'that they could be worked out and that by
being an objector t~e Town would more fully be informed on all
aspects of the Ovate, applications etc.
P.C. workshop
Feb. 24, 1986
page 2
Densities were discussed. The submittals do not reflect some
of the concerns as the board had reviewed on the sketch plan.
Martin stated that he had not changed some of the maps showing
the lowered densities that were asked for. This has lead to
a misunderstanding concerning densities.
Parcel 25: Martin did not have a problem with agreeing to the
5 units per acre.
Parcel 23: The tree line in this parcel was shown by an ai~ial
photo. Martin does not think that staying within the tree line
leaves any developement ground and will work out something in that
area.
Parcel 23 Island. Board had expressed concern for development
in the middle of this area. Martin to address this maybe moving the
structures back to the rest of the development and see what happens.
Martin had no problem staying with the heights recommended.
Discusses the resident neighborhood concept that had been asked
to be included in the development. Agreed with the concept to
restrict to a 30 or longer day rental in the area to accomodate
this idea.
Density transferes only within the resident areas.
Discussed the c~,~LL«ercial area with the idea of having some type
of drawing( red.) feature to secure the commercial interest.
Opitz reviewed the roads. Discussed the County, Town and Town of
Winter Park planning study on the alternate accesses and collectors.
Maryvale given the to date materail on this study and can then
address them in the road plan of this project. After a lenghtiy
discussion Martin stated that he beleived now was the time to
hire a traffic study done so that his planning would address
the study at this time.
C.B. reviewed the need for the bike path easments at this time as
this summer some work is expected to take place. Maryvale does
not have a problem with this, Martin could recommend that they
cooperate to the fullest on this project. C.B. also stated
that this extraction could then be a credit toward a parks dedication
or open space that would be worked out. The fence will have to be
moved during the construction that could be done and we would
ask that we then do not have to move it back to the easment line.
The Town is now planning on in-kind service and town personnal
to get the work do as far as we can. At the time of paving, depending
on the progress of development Maryvale may be asked for money or
some type of recapture fees to be extracted at a latter date
if the path i~ fully constructed without there help.
Martin review the public dedication with tegards to school fees
and parks. They would need the dedications to come at a
subdivision stage, as money is very tight, but should a figure
of a portion be determined at this time they would like it in
writting so they can review and deal with it.
C.B. reviewed the churches request for an ecumenical center. Martin
asked for a proposal so that it could be dealt with.
~rtin stated that the Gondola Aas an idea of the ski area. That
it would not be considered by this development to be built.
Martin reviewed the different methods of building the golf course.
And that it is planned as a phase I project.
Development phaseing will follow the building of the new ski area.
-~ ~. , t ..., .. - ... .. ,. ~ ~ ., r
.. z - '
P.C. workshop
Feb. 24, 1986
page 3
Fiscal Impact study will need to make some assumptions as to
schedules of development so that the study can be done.
Martin will need to respond to all of the comments from this
meeting and revise the plans accordingly and move some of the
development around and will present documents and more information
back to the board for futher review on the PDD application.
Martin review that he would like a proposal in writting as to the
preservation of the Cozens Ranch building so that that could
be dealt with. Martin knows of the local interest to preserve
this building but need a conrete idea.
No futher business, meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m.
ýÿ