HomeMy Public PortalAboutPCM 1989-04-12!,
Fraser Flanning Commission
Fraser Town Board
April 12, 1989
Members of the Planning Commission in attendance were Linda Spooner,
Marianne Klancke, C.B. Jensen, Sue Buchheister. T..~~.. Board present
were Klancke, Finlay, Muhlbauer, Jensen, Schauner, Buchheister.
Meeting is the regular meeting of the Planning Commission and a
special meeting of Town Board continued from the business of April
S, 1989.
Mr. and Mrs. Frakalas were asked to attend and request a zoning for
the property that the Town will annex on April 19th. Frakalas asked
to be zoned Business on the commercial section and residential on
the house portion. Board discussed this and moved to recommend to
the Town Board a business zone for the commercial with an R-3 zone
for the residential portion of property. Frakalas also reviewed at
what point of a remodel the Town would require the business to hook
onto the water system. Hoard advised that it would depend on the
actual plan, size and use and could be determined then.
Owners of the Hud property on Hwy. 40 reviewed a plan to turn the
first two units into a restaurant. Board advised that the review of
this idea would be to size for parking determination, liquor licence
needs, re-zoning, landscaping and design review. Owners will bring
in a more specific site plan for review and take the other steps at
the appropriate time.
Byers Feak continued discussion. C.B. Jensen took a seat in the
audience due to conflict of interest.
Marianne opened the continued discussion with the water section of
the preannexation agreement. Stan Cazier was asked to review the
water language needs and has written various items to be covered.
Discussion on the need for the rights by general warranty deed as
well as a legal opinion written to the Town concerning the rights,
and a preliminary engineer report on the rights to see if the water
could be available to the development and fit into the Towns rights.
Turner agreed to give the water rights under general warrantee deed.
Frovide for a lega] opinion to the Town concerning the water rights,
and get an engineering report on the water rights prior to
annexation. These items being of most concern to Cazier. The Town
will at that time be somewhat assured that the rights will supply
the development. The T..~-~~ should also know at that time if there is
likely to be excess water. Should there be excess water the T..,~.,..
will give credit in that amount to the developer, this will be known
at final augmentation. The developer will proceed at augmentation
at_ his cost .
ýÿ
+-.
The developer reviewed what he anticipates as max. densities for
review by the board:
Atea 1 -- 100 units
A Zone- each 500 sq. ft. of commercial / lose 1 unit.
Area 2-- 6 sites
Area 3--max. 95 single family units
Area 4--140 sites, single family
Area 5--85 duplex lots
Area 6--park and school site, 26 acres
Area T--51 sites
Area 8--18 sites
Area 9-- 90 sites
Area 10-- T4 sites
Area 11-- 4 sites
Open space to be 80 acres not including area 6.
4.01 New language proposed for this section to make it clearer.
Developer wants the park site to always remain either open or park.
Does not want any development other than recreation.
Klancke is concerned with the 80 acres location. Would like
development to state that at least 50$ of this will be in areas 1,3,
and 5. This allows for the site sensitive plan to be complied with.
T.04 Strike " and share"
(2) Byers Peak will pay for paving the bog section.
(3) All remaining portions of said roadway shall be constructed
and paved at the sole expense of Byers Peak.
The road section that relates to repayment of costs should the Town
build the parkway on request of the developer needs to be changed.
Developer does not want a lien on all of the property for these
costs, would like that each subdivision pays its proportion share to
those costs, regardless is a subdivision is ad~acant to parkway.
Developer will be obligated to build road per regulations on all of
the accesses.
Still need to look into pre-sales being allowed.
Agreement to be rewritten and board will review again at the May 3rd
meeting.
No further business, meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
Page - 2
ýÿ