Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2242-1966 - Amending Ordinance No 1472-1953 - Zoning - STRICKENORDINANCE NO. 2242-19,66 q10 AN ORDINANCE Ahl MEDING ORDINANCE D10o 1472-19539 COMUONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF RICHMOND, INDIANA APPROVED APRIL 21, 1953. BE IT ORDAINED BY the Common Council of the City of Richmondq Indiana. SECTION 1. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1472-19539 Commonly known as the Zoning Ordinance of*11ichmondq and the Zone map made a part thereof, described and designated as Suburban the following described territory in Richmond, Wayne County, Indiana, to wit.- 105 North Pickett Drive (Lot No. 20 - Westwood - 1st Addition), Richmondp Indiana. WHM-EASo it is the purpose and intention hereof to chage the use of said territory to Local Business. NOW THEREFORE: SECTION 2. It is hereby ordained that the use district in the Zoning Ordinance and on the Zone map be, and the same is hereby . changed covering the above described territory to Local Business and that said territory and the use and area thereof be regulated accordingly. SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval by the Mayor and publications as by law required. PASSED, by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this day of -1, 19 6, I President of Common Council Attests City Clerk PRESENTED' to the Mayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this day of -, 19 City Clerk APPROVED, by me, IMayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana$ this day of 9 19_. Mayor Attest: City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2242-1966 .AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1472-1953g C0144ONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF RICiabND, INDIANA APPROVED APRIL 21, 1953. BE IT ORDAINED BY the Common Council of the City of Richmonds, Indiana. SECTION 1. WHEREAS9 Ordinance No. 1472-19539 Commonly known as the Zoning Ordinance of Richmond) and the Zone map made a part thereof, described and designated as Suburban the following described territory in Richmondg Wayne County, 16dianat to wit: ' 105 North Pickett Drive (Lot No. 20 - Westwood 1st Addition) Richmond, Indiana. WHEREAS, it is the purpose and intention hereof to chage the use of said territory to Local Business. NOW 1TIEREFOREs SECTIO14 2. It is hereby ordained that the use district in the Zoning Ordinance and on the Zone map be, and the same is hereby changed covering the above described territory to Local Business and that said territory and the use and area thereof be regulated accordingly. SECTION 3. This Oidinmnco shall be in full force and effect from and after its passageg approval by the Mayor and publications as by law required. PASSED, by the Common Council of the City of Richmond,, Indiana, this day .of President of Common Council Attest: City Clerk PRESENTED, to the Mayor of the City of Richmond, Indiana, this day of gig-. City Clerk APPROVED, by me, Moyor of, the City of Richmond, Indiana, this day of ,19 0 Mayor Attest: City Clerk RICHMOND-WAYNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STANTON GEDVILLAS County Court House Director RICHMOND, INDIANA Phone 962-7176 January 27, 1967 Mr. Ather Reeg City Clerk Municipal Building Richmond, Indiana Dear Mr. Reeg: Enclosed please find a copy of the Plan Commission Resolution concerning the petition of Paul and Sally Durbin, 105 North,Pickett Drivel Richmond, Indiana. The Resolution recommends and certifies disapproval of the said petition. Stanton Gedvillas Executive Secretary Richmond City Plan Commission SG/mam Encl. 1 - .. � .:� ...7 ; o _ — .. .� � _ _ ..� City P1I _ Commission WEM 40 an, application for District Change from "V Suburban to fILB11 Zoaal Busitiless was filod by Paul and $41 y Durbin - 105 North Pickett :Prive, Richmondo Indiana can December 16, 1966 for the following described proyerty:.Lot 209 Westwood - Ist Addition and 'duly yrocessed by the City Plan Commjs6ionj as required by WHWAPe 'a_pPU blia- hearing was held.,in conjunction- therewith on Tuesday January a49 1967at whiob hearing apyrdximately twenty .persons were ,present stating their opin idn_diiher in favpr of or in oppositi6h to the said District " Change. as shove in, the official rdciorids.of the said Oommi6ei6nt and MOREAS9 subsequent petitions and other related communication's were received and reviewed; and WTI XAO 9 an appropriate study of the said 4p�lica t.io ,nwas made bythe said 0 : isbion.- fi NOW T9 M. B& la RE ,SOLVEP that the pity VIM- Commission concludes and linds, 66 ion loj.yst 1,, The requestod District Change will' not b.genes .ein geal agree- ment -Ath the desirablq'future'development � of-t .he City as envisioned 'm"Id documenUd by the Combrehen'sive'Haster Plan 2. The requestad District P4ange would be detrimental to other pr6p.eities located: in the general vicinity of the area sought to­bo phanged'in this ii ann�er;. 3# The requested District Change would not be*consonant with the intent and,. purpose of, the City Zoning Ordinance, and 4. The' requested. District dhange'would not be desirable or prac- tical for the follomWng, reason(s): It would convey upon an individual)propdrty use rights vjhich are Wows dented, to other similarly situated properties in the immediate area. BE! IT* FURTWI RESOLM I that on the basis of the- above findings and by virtue of the authority veste'a in the said Commission by l6mis the said Commission herewith disapproved the requested District Changes, subjects however, to the following conditions: and recommends and certifies the said disapproval to the C01466a L Council- for a6tion. as provided by'ieaw.,, BZ IT FINALLY MESOLVED.o that a copy of this Resolution be lorwarded to the appliaant by regist6red mail, and that said copy shall consti- tute an official not i i ce. 1)ate Janud,Y_ 2t, 1262