HomeMy Public PortalAboutT18NR3ES10_GolfCourseMaintenances
i
i
i
1
r
•
•
•..
PA/cilia a Cik tied eJ rrazia rt"
Wendaday, d;ze.
BOISE, IDAHO
1&/d if€ 'iM GGCf
1459 TYRELL LANE, SUITE B
BOISE, IDAHO 83706
TELEPHONE: 208 336-1097
April 11, 1988
Mr. Frank Brown
P.O. Box 864
McCall, ID 83638
STANLEY D. MOE, MAI
JON C. CORLETT, MAI
JOE CORLETT, MAI, SRPA
MAURICE J. "MOE" THERRIEN, MAI
DARREL MATTHEWS, MAI
RE: Memorandum Appraisal of Lot 1,
Block 5, Timberlost No 5
Subdivision, Valley County, Idaho
MS-2602-88
Dear Mr. Brown:
At your request, I have inspected the above -captioned property and have
made investigations and analyses of matters pertinent to the estimation of its
market value in fee simple title, as of April 6 1988.
The subject is located southerly of the intersection of Reedy Lane and
Fairway Drive in McCall, Idaho. It is located westerly of the McCall Golf
Course, Fairway No. 6. It is the appraiser's understanding that adjoining
land areas near the subject will be developed for the new clubhouse facility.
The subject is a first -tier site in that it is not located directly on
the golf course fairways. However, by virtue of its location, it has excel-
lent exposure to the McCall Golf Course, an 18-hole facility operated by the
city of McCall. The subject has primary frontage on a public street along its
westerly boundary
Legal Description
The subject is legally described as Lot 1, Block 5, Timberlost V Subdivi-
sion, a tract of land in the NE4 of Section 9, and the NW; of Section 10,
Township 18 North, Range 3 East Boise -Meridian, Valley County, Idaho.
The subject has an estimated acreage of 2.97 acres. It had been pre-
viously approved for the construction of 50 condominium units. However the
condominium and townhouse market in the McCall area is extremely soft with few
unit sales occurring over the past several years Therefore, the subject is
not considered to be viable for short term condominium or townhouse develop-
ment.
Market Value Defined
"The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive
and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and
Mr. Frank Brown
April 11, 1988
Page 2
seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not
affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation
o f a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer
u nder conditions whereby:
a. buyer and seller are typically motivated;
b. both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what
he considers h7s own best interest;
c. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;
d. payment iS made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or 7n terms of financial
arrangements comparable thereto; and
e . the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaf-
fected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by
anyone associated with the sale."'
Highest and Best Use
A definition of highest and best use is "that reasonable and probable use
that supports the highest present value, as defined, as of the effective date
o f the appraisal.
Alternatively, that use, from among reasonably probable and legal alter-
n ative uses, found to be physically possible, appropriately supported, finan-
cially feasible, and which results in highest land value.
The definition immediately above applies specifically to the highest and
best use of the land. It is to be recognized that in cases where a site has
existing improvements on it, the highest and best use may very well be deter-
mined to be different from the existing use. The existing use will continue,
however, unless and until land value in its highest and best use exceeds the
total value of the property in its existing use.
Implied within these definitions is recognition of the contribution of
that specific use to community environment or to community development goa7s
in addition to wealth maximization of individual property owners. Also im-
plied is that the determination of highest and best use results from the ap-
praiser's judgment and analytical skill, i.e., that the use determined from
analysis represents an opinion, not a fact to be found. In appraisal prac-
tice, the concept of highest and best use represents the premise upon which
✓ alue 7s based. In the context of most probable selling price (market value)
another appropriate term to reflect highest and best use would be most prob-
'Federal Home Loan Bank Board Office of Examinations and Supervision
Memorandum R-41c (Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle, September 11, 1986), pg.
4.
Mr. Frank Brown
April 11, 1988
Page 3
able use. In the coptext of investment value, an alternative term would be
most profitable use."
The estimated highest and best use of the subject at the present time
w ould most probably be for subdivision as a single-family project. It is
possible that the subject could be developed into approximately seven single-
family sites representing a density of 2.36 units per acre which would be
considered a relatively low density development. This conclusion has been
based on the primary sales activity in the immediate neighborhood which has
consisted of single-family sites. It is possible that the subject could be
acquired and held for an indefinite period for ultimate development of condo-
miniums or townhouses when such demand would permit. However at this time,
it is quite speculative to assume that the subject would be at its highest and
best use for condominium development.
The subject had good exposure to the McCall Golf Course and surrounding
✓ esidential properties. It also has availability of city utilities, as well
as public access. Therefore, its value has been estimated based on a develop-
e r's analysis which utilizes market data from nearby land sales and allocates
the costs of development to provide a residual land value for the subject.
Following are sales that were used for comparison to the subject site as
if developed.
Site Sale No. 1
Lot 6 of Block 4 of Timberlost V Subdivision, sold in July of 1987. This
is a golf course fronting site that encloses approximately 15 000 square feet.
It sold under a land sales contract at a selling price of $22,000. It is
✓ esidentially zoned All utilities are generally available to this site in-
cluding central sewer, water, electricity, and telephone services.
This sale would require a downward adjustment to reflect its superior
amenity location, as well as superior sales terms. After adjustment, the
indicated value for a typical subject site, as if developed, would approximate
$15,000.
Site Sale No. 2
Lot 7 of Block 4 of Timberlost V Subdivision, sold in November of 1987.
This site also has golf course frontage and encloses approximately 15,000
square feet. The sale price was $20 000 with cash terms. This sale is simi-
lar to Lot 6 of Block 4 with the exception of sales terms.
2American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers and The Society of Real
Estate Appraisers, Real Estate Appraisal Terminology, Revised Edition, (Bal-
linger Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982), pp. 126-127.
Mr. Frank Brown
April 11, 1988
Page 4
This sale should be adjusted downwards for superior amenity location when
compared to the subject. After adjustment, the indicated value is $15,000 per
typical site in the subject as developed.
Site Sale No. 3
Lot 29 of the Condominium Plat of Timberlost III Subdivision, sold in May
of 1986. This is a similar site when compared to that proposed for the sub-
ject in that it has no direct golf course frontage. It sold for $15,000 with
cash terms. All utilities were available to this site Its estimated size is
11,400 square feet
This sale is considered similar to that proposed for the subject as if
developed. Therefore, the indicated value is $15,000 per site.
Site Sale No. 4
Lot 31 of the Condominium Plat of Timberlost III Subdivision, sold in
October of 1986. This site encloses approximately 8,400 square feet and has
n o golf course frontage. It sold under contract terms at a sales price of
$15,000. It is estimated that the smaller site area is offset by the favor-
able sales terms indicating no overall adjustment. Thus, the subject's value
is estimated at a rate of $15,000 per site.
Summary and Conclusions
After adjusted, the above sales indicate the same value. Therefore, an
average site value of $15,000 has been concluded assuming development of the
subject parcel into seven sites.
The next step in this analysis is to process the above data to a final
conclusion of market value for the subject in an as -is condition. This is
accomplished by the Developer's Analysis.
Developer's Analysis
As previously discussed the gross sales for the subject are estimated at
$15,000 per site assuming development of seven sites. From that amount, a
deduction is made to allow for sales promotion and overhead. This expense is
e stimated at ten percent of the gross sales proceeds. Additional development
e xpenses are deducted at a rate of $1,500 per site which should account for
surveying, platting, and sewer stubs for each of subject sites This expense
has been estimated at $1 500 per site, or $10,500. A developer's profit is
also deducted from the sales proceeds. This amount is estimated at 20 percent
o f sales proceeds The land residual reflects the anticipated return to the
site over an absorption period. This absorption period is estimated to be 24
months based on observations made by the appraiser of increasing sales activi-
ty in the general neighborhood The sales proceeds are discounted at a 14
percent annual rate with monthly compounding. It is felt that a 14 percent
Mr. Frank Brown
April 11, 1988
Page 5
discount rate is appropriate in view of underlying risk and respective oppor-
tunity costs. Following is a summary of the developer's analysis.
Developer's Analysis
Lot 1, Block 5, Timberlost V Subdivision
Gross Sales - 7 sites @ $15,000 ea.
Less: Sales Promotion and Overhead (10%)
Sales Proceeds
Less: Development Expenses @ $1,500/site
Subtotal
Less: Developer's Profit (20%)
Land Residual
Discounted 24 mos. @ 14%
$2,712.50/mo. x 20.8276* _
*PW of $1/mo.
- 24 mos. @ 14% annual interest.
Summary and Conclusions
$105,000
$-10,500
$ 94,500
$-10.500
$ 84,000
$-18,900
$ 65,100
$ 56,495
Rounded to: $ 56,500
Only the Market Data Approach was used to estimate the market value of
the subject property. It was not possible to provide a market data analysis
of the property in an as -is condition by virtue of comparing other vacant
development sites to the subject. There were no recent sales found by the
appraiser after a search of the market and interviews with brokers and devel-
opers in the marketplace. Therefore only a developer's analysis utilizing
market data involving developed sites was used to estimate the market value of
the subject property in an as -is condition. The Cost and Income Approaches
were not considered applicable to the analysis of the subject property.
Therefore, subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions set forth,
and based on the information and analyses contained in this report and my
Mr. Frank Brown
April II, 1988
Page 6
files, the estimated market value of the subject property in fee simple title,
as of April 6, 1988, was:
***E f i. i Y SIX THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS***
***($56,500)***
I t should be clearly understood that this memorandum is limited in scope.
A fully documented narrative appraisal report can be completed upon being
commissioned to do so by the client.
If you should have any further questions, or if I may be of additional
assistance, please do not hesitate to call upon me. Thank you for this oppor-
tunity to be of service.
Respectfully submitted,
MOUNTAIN STATES APPRAISAL
AND CONSULTING, INC.
orlett, MAI, SRPA
sh
Certification
I, Joe Corlett, MAI, SRPA, do hereby certify that except as otherwise
noted in this memorandum appraisal:
1. 1 have personally inspected the subject property.
2 I have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that
is the subject of this memorandum appraisal.
3. 1 have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of
this memorandum appraisal or the parties involved.
4. My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from
the analyses, opinion, or conclusions in, or the use of, this memorandum
appraisal.
To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained
in this memorandum appraisal, upon which the analyses, opinions, and
conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct.
6. This memorandum appraisal sets forth all of the limiting conditions im-
posed by the terms of our assignment or by the undersigned affecting the
analyses, opinions, and conclusions in this memorandum appraisal.
7. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this memoran-
dum appraisal has been prepared in conformity with, and is subject to,
the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of
the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers.
8. No one other than the undersigned prepared the analyses, opinions, and
conclusions concerning real estate that are set forth in this memorandum
appraisal.
9. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited by the re-
ported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased
professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
10. I am currently certified under the voluntary continuing education program
of the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers.
11. The use of this memorandum appraisal is subject to the requirements of
the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers relating to review by
its duly authorized representatives.
Assumptions and Limitin4 Conditions
This appraisal was made according to the following assumptions and limit-
ing conditions:
1. No legal questions are considered, such as title, encumbrances, etc. The
property is appraised as though free and clear except as specifically
noted within this report.
2. All dimensions and legal descriptions found through available records or
o n -site inspection are assumed to be correct.
3. The subject property will be under management that is competent and
ownership that is responsible.
4. All information as found in data furnished is deemed to be reliable; if
any errors are found, the right is reserved to modify the conclusions.
5. The data and conclusions embodied in this appraisal are a part of the
w hole valuation. No part of this appraisal is to be used out of context;
and by itself alone, no part of this appraisal is necessarily correct in
that it represents only part of the evidence upon which the final esti-
mate of value is based.
6. Disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report is governed by the
bylaws and regulations of the American Institute of Real Estate Apprais-
e rs of the National Association of Realtors.
7. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any
conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser, the firm with
w hich he is connected, any reference to the American Institute of Real
Estate Appraisers or to the MAI or RM designations) shall be dissemi-
nated to the public through advertising media, public relations media,
n ews media, sales media, or any other public means of communication with-
o ut the prior written consent and approval of the appraiser.
8. We have no knowledge concerning the presence of any hazardous materials
o n the site as of the date of the appraisal. We have not conducted any
tests to determine whether or not such hazardous materials and/or related
conditions exist on the site. We recommend that the reader direct any
questions concerning this issue to a firm of registered professional
e ngineers specializing in providing such testing and analysis. We assume
that the site is free from hazardous waste contamination. Any contamina-
tion subsequently found on the subject site, however automatically rend-
e rs this appraisal null and void.
9. The sketch in this report is included to assist the reader in visualizing
the property. The appraiser has made no survey of the property and as-
sumes no responsibility in connection with such matters.
10. The various approaches to value and mathematical calculations used in
e stimating value are merely aids to the formulation of the opinion of
✓ alue expressed by the appraiser in this report In these calculations
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions, Cont'd.
certain arithmetical figures are rounded off to the nearest significant
amount.
11. Employment to make this appraisal does not require testimony in court
unless mutually satisfactory arrangements are made in advance
12. The contents of this report, and the work product required to prepare it,
is considerably less than that required for a completely documented ap-
praisal report. If court testimony is required by the appraiser, it will
be necessary to prepared a completely documented appraisal report before
such testimony is given.
13. In order to better estimate the value of the property as a whole, the
✓ alue of the land and the improvements may be shown separately; however,
the value shown for either may or may not be its correct fair market
✓ alue.
14. This appraisal has been made on the premise that construction of the pro-
posed subdivision improvements had been completed according to typical
subdivision specifications, and sufficient time had passed for absorp-
tion. This time has been estimated at 24 months. Should absorption vary
from that estimated herein, or anticipated development expenses vary from
those estimated herein, a reanalysis would be necessary by the appraiser
15. The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or apparent conditions of
the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less
valuable. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions,
o r for engineering which might be required to discover such factors
16. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for any structural or equipment
defects hidden or unapparent, or conditions such as substandard insula-
tion, plumbing or wiring, water leaks, defective roof condition, settle-
ment, or structure problems; or for engineering which might be required
to discover such conditions or factors
17. The appraiser does not warranty the value of the condition of the proper-
ty. The client and/or purchaser should satisfy himself/herself that the
price and the condition of the property are acceptable.
18. The value conclusion reported assumes typical financing terms available
to the subject property.
Ph vLograDhs of the Subject
^
•
•
•
1
•
•
•
allrirby
eseffrrnet 'e`
1�P
astir
•1
• • En
1
or
11,
•
Ai •
•`r_`,i1
41
q
41.
1 •
1,;fa Ilk
note
1
r
if SPONtipir
•
•
T
•
st
tir• •
,
r e
'
' 1
- a •
••,
•
•
•:` [9
• 1' •
•
•
•
•�
car
',
J
4
idloi
� - '..
1 1 •
• ,• jf
�•,
i ��aar1
4. •
•
lbe
•
1
•
1
.I
•
•
•
4,7414
"‘•
•
t
r
f•
1
Southeasterly view of subject from Reedy Lane
Southeasterly view from subject towards golf course.
Photographs of the Sutiect, Cont'd.
- :rear- ,
Westerly view along Reedy Lane, subject on left.
Easterly view along Reedy Lane, subject on right.
" " " t o m . , t '