HomeMy Public PortalAboutCCMINS 07-11-1988July 11, 1988
REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 11~ 1988
CLOSED SESSION
Prior to the regular City Council meeting, the Council met in a
Closed Session with the City Attorney regarding pending
litigation.
The regular meeting of the City Council was held on July 11, 1988,
in the Council Chambers, 3575 Pacific Avenue. The meeting was
called to order at 7:00 p.m., immediately following the Closed
Session.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilmembers Brown, Wieskamp and Mayor Turner.
Absent: Councilmember Bartoli and Vice Mayor Vargas (excused).
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Turner led the Councilmembers and audience in the pledge of
allegiance.
MINUTES APPROVAL-None
PROCLAMATION
Proclaiming July as Park and Recreation Month.
LARPD Board Member, accepted the proclamation.
Larry Faltings,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TRIP RATES
This item was continued from the Council meetings of June 13 and
27, 1988. Hearing regarding adoption of a resolution establishing
peak hour trip rates and a fee schedule to implement the Traffic
Impact Fee Ordinance. Re-adoption of previous Negative
Declaration.
Staff recommended that the Council establish peak hour trip rates
and adopt the resolution to implement the fee.
CM/43/298
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Continued)
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRIP RATES
(Continued)
Mayor Turner explained that on May 23 the Council adopted the
Traffic Impact Ordinance. The Council must now decide whether to
proceed with the 20-year program or the total build-out program.
Staff has concluded that the 20-year program is more realistic even
though it is slightly more expensive. Another issue that the
Council must decide is rebates to sales tax-generating retail
businesses.
The Mayor also stated that the Chamber of Commerce had requested
that this item be continued to allow discussion with the staff.
Since the June 27 meeting, staff has met with Chamber
representatives and he believes they have satisfied concerns raised
by the Chamber in their letter dated June 9. The Chamber has asked
that the Council revise Section 12.30(e) to read that the "Council
can review the traffic impact fee program as it deems necessary."
Staff agrees with this proposed change. The Chamber is also
requesting a change to Section 12.30.090.a(7). This section now
reads that "additions, extensions, or enlargements of an existing
structure of 200 feet or less in any one calendar year shall be
exempt from the fee." The Chamber would like to have the exception
raised to 1,000 square feet. Staff agrees with the proposed
change.
These amendments to the ordinance will be brought back to the
Council along with other contemplated changes in August or
September.
Assistant city Manager Jerry Peeler reviewed the issues with which
the Council will need to be concerned. Regarding the rebate, he
stated that the Omni-Means study recognizes this issue and already
exempts them up to 50%. The general fund would have to provide the
rebate, and staff does not believe it should be made a part of
this. Staff also recommends that the Council adopt the 20-year
build-out program.
Mayor Turner said that in a letter dated May 23 he recalls that
Council directed that Vasco Road be reduced to four lanes.
CM Wieskamp said that she recalls directing a six-lane
right-of-way, but with four lanes marked.
CM/43/299
-'""TV'T-
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TRIP RATES (Continued)
Mayor Turner said staff could take this as direction to make that
change.
The public hearing was opened.
Dan Spruiell, realtor, urged the Council to approve the rebate
program for the retail businesses. He said he believes the Council
will be putting the downtown in jeopardy if this is not approved.
John Stein, Kathy Court, urged the Council to not provide for the
rebate program since he believes the downtown does receive the
benefit. He also asked that the Council consider providing for a
"circuit breaker" type traffic level for intersections. He said
he believes if the Council approves putting Concannon Boulevard
through to Tesla Road, it will not be in accordance with the
voters' wishes in Measure A. Mr. Stein said he felt the agreement
made with Orchard, Dividend and Standard threatens the viability of
the traffic impact fee.
No other public comments were offered at this time.
Jerry Peeler explained that the circulation element of the General
Plan consideration in the Fall will take care of changing any road
sizes. Each facility will be returned to the Council in some
fashion for design and specifications, particularly roadway sizes.
Mayor Turner informed Mr. Stein that staff has considered the
"circuit breaker" technique for levels of traffic. However, staff
has concluded it is not practical for Livermore.
Mayor Turner asked Mr. Peeler to respond to Mr. Spruiell's comment
regarding the rebate program, and asked if the Council decided to
pursue this, could it be done in the future?
Jerry Peeler said that the Council can consider that as an
amendment; however, in the short term the City should have some
experience with the fee so that we can see what it does and then
tailor the downtown to the ordinance. One million dollars has been
included for a parking lot downtown, and all of the downtown will
benefit from that.
CM/43/300
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Continued)
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
TRIP RATES
(Continued)
Mayor Turner noted that if this resolution passes, the Council
should consider setting up a date to meet with the downtown
organizations through the Project Area Committee.
Jerry Peeler said that given the fact the City has not had any
experience dealing with the fee, we would expect to come back to
the Council for amendments within 90 to 180 days. Rather than
coming back to the Council for each separate amendment, staff will
be returning with a list of amendments at certain intervals.
In response to CM Brown's question as to whether the circulation
element could be discussed at the same time as amendments to the
traffic impact ordinance, Jerry Peeler said that appears to be
about 120 days, and that it is a possibility.
CM Brown said that she has supported the fee, but would like to see
changes made on certain street sizes during the review of the
circulation element.
COUNCILMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO SUPPORT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION FOR A 20-YEAR BUILD-OUT PROGRAM, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, AND PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER
BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT).
RESOLUTION NO. 190-88
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PURSUANT TO
LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.30.050
(20-Year Buildout)
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
#5247/PECK/
F & P ASSOCIATES
This item was continued from the meeting of June 27, 1988.
Tentative Parcel Map #5247, request of Bill Peck/F & P Properties,
to subdivide a 25+/- acre industrial site into nine parcels.
Location: At North Mines Road, north of Santa Fe Railroad
right-of-way. Zoning District: I-3 (Heavy Industrial). General
Plan: High Intensity Industrial. Previously submitted
Environmental Impact Report consideration.
CM/43/301
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #5247/PECK/F & P ASSOCIATES (Continued)
Staff recommended instructions be given to file the environmental
determination, require the applicant to furnish certified EIR to
Caltrans and U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and approve the tentative map
subject to conditions.
Planning Director Bob Brown explained that this item was continued
to permit staff and the applicant to prepare additional information
regarding the future circulation of the area west of the project
site. Access to the project site and the adjacent properties owned
by Smith are currently being provided by Travarno Road. If the
current project is approved, primary access to the site will be
provided by Las Positas Road. The use of Travarno Road will be
limited to a secondary access for emergency purposes only. The
Smith property will continue to utilize Travarno Road for its
primary means of access, but emergency access could be provided by
the streets in this project. The unutilized right-of-way property
does not currently have access to a public street. The portion of
the abandoned right-of-way that is east of the future North Mines
Road will utilize the proposed Peck Street. If any future
development is proposed for the abandoned right-of-way that is west
of the future North Mines Road, it will be necessary for the
property owners to acquire access before any development can be
approved.
The applicant currently has a series of options to purchase the
right-of-way when it is no longer being utilized by the railroad
companies. Prior to any development of the railroad right-of-way
in the area west of Travarno Road, and possibly the right-of-way
between Travarno and North Mines Roads, it will be necessary for
the property owner to extend the public street to the site. It
appears the most desirable location for this street would be across
the land currently being utilized by P.G. & E. as a corporation
yard. This would create a four-way intersection with Portola
Avenue and First Street. In order to provide a secondary access to
the area, it will be necessary for the property owner to acquire
the southerly portion of the Smith property to connect the street
to the Peck Street extension being provided by this tentative
parcel map. The Peck project has extended a public street to serve
an area that previously was served only by Travarno Road.
CM/43/302
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Continued)
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
#5247/PECK/
F & P ASSOCIATES
(Continued)
While this does not provide the ideal solution to the circulation
need of the area, staff supports the approval of this project
because it will significantly improve the access to the area that
was formerly served only by easements across Travarno Road.
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing.
Asa Syufy, Reimer Associates representing the applicant, displayed
a plan which showed the street configurations, as well as the
entire development. He noted that only the Smith property, with
this plan, will need to use Travarno Road, and that the street
previously noted in their plan as Pell Court has been removed since
it is not a requirement for the approval of this map.
Mr. Syufy said there is an agreement between F & P and the railroad
to purchase the three surplus areas of right-of-way.
Mr. William Cooper, resident on Travarno Road, said that this looks
like a very positive plan. The Travarno residents welcome the fact
that other access will be available to the properties to the south,
and that Travarno Road will no longer be used for these
properties.
Maryanne Payne, representing Bart, said that she believes Caltrans
is concerned with the compatibility of this development with Bart's
long-range plans. She requested a copy of the final EIR.
John Stein, Kathy Court, said there is a lot of land, but there are
homes on Duke Way and to the west. He asked how this proposal
would restrict moving the tracks since they need to go farther to
the north.
No other public comments were made at this time.
Regarding the question by the Bart representative, Bob Brown stated
that there is a response from Caltrans to the draft EIR; however,
the question is what are Bart's long-term plans. From a physical
standpoint, this site does not lend itself to a maintenance yard or
a station site.
CM/43/303
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #5247/PECK/F & P ASSOCIATES (Continued)
Mayor Turner pointed out that the other issue is the track movement
to the north. The railroad dictates where Bart would be building
their tracks and the City must work with the people in that area to
not impact them any more than possible.
John Hines said that the tracks are currently located about 40 feet
from the fence, but it is more like 70 feet from the track to the
bedrooms. The alignment is matched up so that he does not believe
that the railroad could be relocated now.
In response to Mayor Turner's question regarding Smith's use of
Travarno Road, Bob Brown stated that the City has the ability to
extinguish the lease, but that we can make it very easy for him to
use an alternative route now through the Peck property and then to
First Street.
COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP MOVED TO ADOPT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
STAFF RECOMMENDATION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BROWN.
No other comments were offered on the motion, and the public
hearing was closed.
THE MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE
MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT).
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-203 - SWIMMING POOL FENCES
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment #T-203, City-initiated, to revise
the Zoning Ordinance regarding swimming pool fences; to bring the
Zoning Ordinance into conformance with proposed revisions to the
building regulations, Title 15 of the Municipal Code, expanding
requirements to include a secondary fence. Negative Declaration
consideration.
AS A RESULT OF A REQUEST BY VICE MAYOR VARGAS, THIS ITEM WAS
CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JULY 25, ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER
WIESKAMP, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE
(COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT).
CM/43/304
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Continued)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
#5645/WARMINGTON/
NORTHWOOD HOMES
Tentative Tract Map #5645, request of Warmington Homes/Northwood
Homes, to relocate 10 townhouse units from the west to the east of
the main entry road and to revise house plans. Councilmember
Bartoli has appealed the Planning Commission recommendation and
wishes to consider the Visual Resources Policies in more detail.
Location: North side of Portola Avenue, west of First Street.
Parcel Size: 25+/- acres. Zoning District: PD (Planned
Development). General Plan: Urban Low Medium (3 du/ac). Negative
Declaration consideration based on prior Environmental Impact
Report.
Staff recommended that Council evaluate compliance of the project
with the Visual Resources Policies. The Planning Commission
recommends approval of the amendment and revision to house plans;
find the project in compliance with Visual Resources Policies, with
instruction to file the environmental determination.
Mayor Turner explained that CM Bartoli had made this appeal.
However, he was unable to reach her and she did not leave any
direction with staff.
The Planning Department has determined that this is a minor impact,
and the Planning Commission recommended approval of this
amendment.
CM Brown asked the Planning Director to explain the amendment
further.
Bob Brown explained that this is a request to amend a previously
approved tentative map. It went to the Planning Commission, and as
part of the staff's recommendation, they pointed out the terrain
and suggested that the Commission reaffirm the visual resource
policy for this amendment. Development of the site has already
been approved. They want to make some minor changes and to
relocate the townhouses and single-family homes. No new area is
being proposed. The types of units, roadways, etc., do not change.
CM/43/305
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #5645/WARMINGTON/NORTHWOOD HOMES
Mr. Brown pointed out the land form in question. The Planning
Commission concluded that this was not a major feature to be
controlled by the visual resource policy. It is a rise and not a
major ridge line. The developer is sensitive to the policy and, in
response to that, has proposed as part of the Housing
Implementation Program, to not develop the property to the west,
which would allow the roadway to be dropped lower. The roadway
will have units on either side. The proposal was to amend the plan
so the road could drop lower, and therefore not build on the
highest point.
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing.
Tom Sanbourne, representing Warmington Homes, informed the Council
that they had redesigned the area and have resited the larger homes
on custom lots. They are scattering the townhomes throughout the
single family areas also. He pointed out that nothing has changed
along the ridge relative to the modification; however, they are
planning to drop the road lower as described by Mr. Brown. He
urged the Council to deny the appeal and support the Planning
Commission's recommendation.
COUNCILMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL AND SUPPORT THE
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
WIESKAMP.
CM Wieskamp asked Mr. Sanbourne what, if any, changes were made in
the design of the development when the roadway was dropped lower.
Mr. Sanbourne informed her that it eliminated two units. He also
stated that they would set aside 30 acres for open space.
THE MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE
MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT) AND THE APPEAL REGARDING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
#5645 WAS DENIED, AND THE AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO
CONDITIONS.
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-196
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment #T-196, City-initiated, to amend
the CN (Neighborhood Commercial) District to increase the maximum
parcel size from 6 to 12 acres, consistent with the most recent
amendments to the General Plan text. Negative Declaration based
upon prior consideration.
CM/43/306
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Continued)
ZONING ORDINAI~CE TEXT
AMENDMENT #T-196
(Continued)
The Planning Commission and staff recommended that the
environmental determination be filed and the text amendment
approved.
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing.
John Stein, Kathy Court, spoke against the amendment and inquired
if a minimum size had been considered. He suggested that a three
to four acre minimum would make a good number to support the
zoning.
Bob Brown said that a minimum was not set because the Council might
decide that a 7-11 Store, for instance, or an AM-PM market is
appropriate and important to serve the needs of a particular area.
The staff feels that the General Plan is the place to make that
decision.
CM Brown said that she basically does not oppose the ordinance, but
would not want to see it made easy to have small convenience
markets throughout the City, and does not want to see this diluted
by mini stores.
Bob Brown pointed out that that will depend on how the Council
elects to administer the ordinance.
CM Wieskamp said that the Council could take these on a
case-by-case basis, and as long as there is flexibility with the
constraints of the General Plan it can be controlled.
COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP MOVED TO ADOPT THE STAFF AND PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT, SECONDED BY
MAYOR TURNER. NO OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE OFFERED, AND THE
MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BROWN AND VICE MAYOR
VARGAS ABSENT).
CM Brown noted for the record that she is supporting this amendment
reluctantly.
CM/43/307
.................... T-'""T1--T- .................. ~ ..... TI-- ......... T ..... ] ................ TI[ ................................ T .................
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-197
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment #T-197, City-initiated, to amend
the CS (Community Service) District and adopt a CHS (Commercial
Highway Service) District to clarify the distinction between
commercial and highway service uses. The Council may also consider
amendments to Section 20.00, General Plan Provisions, necessary to
incorporate the CHS District into the Zoning Ordinance. Negative
Declaration based upon prior consideration.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended that the
environmental determination be filed and the text amendment
approved.
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing.
Rich Henghold, Stonehenge Realtors, questioned the Council
regarding the signage which is permitted for freeway-oriented
businesses. He questioned whether or not the Council felt that
business would be lost because of the sign restrictions.
Bob Brown responded by stating that the ordinance does provide for
signs along the highway, and staff did not change that part of the
ordinance, just added this district. A business can get a sign
taller than eight feet. There are two provisions and those for the
freeway can go higher, but the surface businesses would have lower
signage.
No other public comments were offered.
COUNCILMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO APPROVE THE STAFF AND PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THIS AMENDMENT, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED AND THE MOTION
PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS
ABSENT).
1988-89 PROPOSITION 4 APPROPRIATION LIMIT
Hearing to consider adoption of resolution establishing 1988-89
Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit.
This item was continued to the meeting of July 25 to allow the
appropriate notification period of 15 days.
CM/43/308
July 11, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(Continued)
CITIZENS FORUM
Donald King, Dolores Street, spoke to the Council regarding the
lack of affordable homes in Livermore.
Roman Morkowski agreed with Mr. King.
John Stein, Kathy Court, had the following comments:
He suggested that the residents near the area of Portola and
to the north should be informed as to the future plans for
that area, and that a single agency should be designated to
maintain the open space being dedicated to the City.
Regarding move-up housing, the Growth Rate Policy Committee
has decided that Livermore has done more than any other City
to provide affordable housing.
He commented that this evening's meeting has been very calm
and even-paced, and suggested that when future agendas are
very large, part of the business be put over to the following
Monday or Tuesday.
MATTERS INITIATED
SIGN/GOLF COURSE
In response to an inquiry by CM Wieskamp regarding signs proposed
for installation at the Portola Park and 1-580 Golf Course,
Mr. Horner advised that the sign ordinance issue will be placed on
the July 25 City Council agenda.
PROCLAMATIO~HANSEN
PARK
CM Wieskamp requested a proclamation be prepared for the citizen
who repaired the wagon at Hansen Park.
CITY-MAINTAINED
FENCES
CM Wieskamp suggested that the City consider adopting a policy
which would require that all City-maintained fences be constructed
of masonry.
CM/43/309
July 11, 1988
MATTERS INITIATED (Continued)
REALTOR/A-FRAME SIGNS
CM Wieskamp asked staff to develop a solution to the
realtor/a-frame sign issues.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Turner suggested that staff consider the possibility of
scheduling public hearing meetings when the agendas are too large
to handle a number of public hearings as well as the other agenda
items.
SIGNS - EAST AVENUE/MINES ROAD
Mayor Turner asked that staff research the feasibility of
installing signs for safety purposes at the East Avenue/Mines Road
intersection. He said the bikers, joggers, walkers are in danger.
SECOND STREET PARKING LOT
Mayor Turner said VM Vargas asked him to bring up the matter of the
Second Street restaurant parcel which the Redevelopment Agency has
considered condemning for a parking lot.
Jerry Peeler explained that the restaurant owner has applied for a
$50,000 grant improvement loan. The problem is that the property
is part of the Garden Court Plaza. A determination is needed to
decide if that project is going forward.
CM Brown said she has a problem taking property when a business
owner is willing to improve his site.
1-580/680 INTERCHANGE
Mayor Turner asked the Council to support sending letters to
Caltrans and our legislative representatives regarding the
1-580/680 accident rate, asking that patrol be increased and other
means be implemented to slow down the traffic.
CONSENT CAr~NDAR
ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
WIESKAMP, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR
VARGAS ABSENT), THE CONSENT CALENDAR WAS APPROVED AS FOLLOWS:
CM/43/310
July 11, 1988
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Continued)
SECOND GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT OF 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 191-88
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN
(1988 - Second General Plan Amendment)
TTM #5906/CALDEIRA &
JONES
RESOLUTION NO. 192-88
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(Tract Map #5906 - C.U.P. #112-88)
TTM #5911/MASON/
SMITH/ROBERTSON
This item was deleted from the agenda and continued to the meeting
of July 25.
BID AWARD/ANNUAL
AUDIT SERVICES
RESOLUTION NO. 193-88
A RESOLUTION AWARDING BID AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
(Audit Services)
JUNE 7 ELECTION/
MEASURE K
RESOLUTION NO. 194-88
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CANVASS OF VOTES ON MEASURE K AT THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION OF JUNE 7, 1988
(Yes Votes = 5,464 No Votes = 6,298)
CM/43/311
July 11, 1988
CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/TM #5462
RESOLUTION NO. 195-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE
FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
(Tract #5462)
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/TM #5469
RESOLUTION NO. 196-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE
FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
(Tract #5469)
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/TM #5643
RESOLUTION NO. 197-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE
FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE
(Tract #5643)
LOW INCOME HOUSING AGREEMENT/VILLA CHARDONNAY INVESTORS
RESOLUTION NO. 198-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
(Villa Chardonnay Investors/College Commons)
AGREEMENT/PROPERTY ACQUISITION/VILLA CHARDONNAY INVESTORS
RESOLUTION NO. 199-88
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
(Villa Chardonnay Investors/College Commons))
CDBG PROGRAM/CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PLAN
The Council approved the Citizens Participation Plan in connection
with the Community Development Block Grant Program upon the
recommendation of the Social Concerns Committee.
CM/43/312
July 11, 1988
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Continued)
AMENDMENT TO RESOLU-
TION REGARDING
PARKING RESTRICTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 200-88
A RESOLUTION SUPERCEDING RESOLUTION NO. 66-88, WHICH ESTABLISHED
A COMPILATION OF RESTRICTED PARKING ZONES BY ADDING AND
DELETING CERTAIN DESIGNATIONS WITHIN THE RESTRICTED PARKING
ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF LIVERMORE
REJECTING CLAIMS
RESOLUTION NO. 201-88
A RESOLUTION REJECTING CLAIM
(Robert Halleck)
RESOLUTION NO. 202-88
A RESOLUTION REJECTING CLAIM
Dwight and Cindy Fairchild
SUMMARY MINUTES
The Planning meeting minutes of May 17, 1988, were received.
PAYROLL AND CLAIMS
There were claims in the amount of $741,597.94 and $480,400.22,
dated June 24 and June 30, 1988.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was discussion regarding a lease agreement with First Venture
Restaurants to operate the restaurant at the Las Positas Golf
Course. No action was required, and the item was continued to
July 25.
CM/43/313
July 11, 1988
ORDINANCES
ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
WIESKAMP, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR
VARGAS ABSENT), THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCES WERE ADOPTED.
REZONING #Z-369/ROBLES
ORDINANCE NO. 1268
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED,
OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00
THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
(Rezoning - Z-369)
PREZONING #Z-365 (Portions of Lomitas Avenue)
ORDINANCE NO. 1269
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED,
OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00
THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
(Prezoning - Z-365)
REZONING #Z-366/ROBERTSON
ORDINANCE NO. 1270
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED,
OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00
THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
(Rezoning - Z-366)
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1081
ORDINANCE NO. 1271
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 1081 WHICH AMENDED
ORDINANCE 442 AS AMENDED RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES (REPEALING RR-1 PREZONING ON 1591, 1605 AND 1653
LOMITAS AVENUE)
REZONING #Z-375 (2489 College Avenue)
This item was continued to the meeting of July 25, 1988.
CM/43/314
July 11, 1988
ORDINANCES
(Continued)
ORDINANCE AMENDING
MUNICIPAL CODE,
CHAPTER 2.20
ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BROWN, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR
VARGAS ABSENT), THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1272
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.20.010 (BONDS REQUIRED FOR
CERTAIN OFFICERS) OF CHAPTER 2.20 (OFFICERS' BONDS) OF TITLE 2
(ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) OF THE LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL CODE
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS
The Councilmembers requested additional information regarding the
feasibility of adopting local water conservation guidelines as
recommended by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)
Committee for Water Policy Consensus.
NEW BUSINESS
BART STATION/USE FOR
CHRISTMAS TREE SALES
A request was received by John Regan to use the former Bart station
lot on Stanley Boulevard for Christmas tree sales for the 1988
Christmas season.
The Council instructed staff to work with Mr. Regan to negotiate an
agreement for the use of that site.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. to a public meeting to be held
on July 18, 7:00 p.m., City Council Chamb)~r~, to receive public
comment and input regarding interest in ~lac~ng another Gann
Limitation Measure on the November 8 ba~lot.~
CM/43/315