Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutCCMINS 07-11-1988July 11, 1988 REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 11~ 1988 CLOSED SESSION Prior to the regular City Council meeting, the Council met in a Closed Session with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation. The regular meeting of the City Council was held on July 11, 1988, in the Council Chambers, 3575 Pacific Avenue. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m., immediately following the Closed Session. ROLL CALL Present: Councilmembers Brown, Wieskamp and Mayor Turner. Absent: Councilmember Bartoli and Vice Mayor Vargas (excused). PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Turner led the Councilmembers and audience in the pledge of allegiance. MINUTES APPROVAL-None PROCLAMATION Proclaiming July as Park and Recreation Month. LARPD Board Member, accepted the proclamation. Larry Faltings, PUBLIC HEARINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TRIP RATES This item was continued from the Council meetings of June 13 and 27, 1988. Hearing regarding adoption of a resolution establishing peak hour trip rates and a fee schedule to implement the Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance. Re-adoption of previous Negative Declaration. Staff recommended that the Council establish peak hour trip rates and adopt the resolution to implement the fee. CM/43/298 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TRIP RATES (Continued) Mayor Turner explained that on May 23 the Council adopted the Traffic Impact Ordinance. The Council must now decide whether to proceed with the 20-year program or the total build-out program. Staff has concluded that the 20-year program is more realistic even though it is slightly more expensive. Another issue that the Council must decide is rebates to sales tax-generating retail businesses. The Mayor also stated that the Chamber of Commerce had requested that this item be continued to allow discussion with the staff. Since the June 27 meeting, staff has met with Chamber representatives and he believes they have satisfied concerns raised by the Chamber in their letter dated June 9. The Chamber has asked that the Council revise Section 12.30(e) to read that the "Council can review the traffic impact fee program as it deems necessary." Staff agrees with this proposed change. The Chamber is also requesting a change to Section 12.30.090.a(7). This section now reads that "additions, extensions, or enlargements of an existing structure of 200 feet or less in any one calendar year shall be exempt from the fee." The Chamber would like to have the exception raised to 1,000 square feet. Staff agrees with the proposed change. These amendments to the ordinance will be brought back to the Council along with other contemplated changes in August or September. Assistant city Manager Jerry Peeler reviewed the issues with which the Council will need to be concerned. Regarding the rebate, he stated that the Omni-Means study recognizes this issue and already exempts them up to 50%. The general fund would have to provide the rebate, and staff does not believe it should be made a part of this. Staff also recommends that the Council adopt the 20-year build-out program. Mayor Turner said that in a letter dated May 23 he recalls that Council directed that Vasco Road be reduced to four lanes. CM Wieskamp said that she recalls directing a six-lane right-of-way, but with four lanes marked. CM/43/299 -'""TV'T- July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TRIP RATES (Continued) Mayor Turner said staff could take this as direction to make that change. The public hearing was opened. Dan Spruiell, realtor, urged the Council to approve the rebate program for the retail businesses. He said he believes the Council will be putting the downtown in jeopardy if this is not approved. John Stein, Kathy Court, urged the Council to not provide for the rebate program since he believes the downtown does receive the benefit. He also asked that the Council consider providing for a "circuit breaker" type traffic level for intersections. He said he believes if the Council approves putting Concannon Boulevard through to Tesla Road, it will not be in accordance with the voters' wishes in Measure A. Mr. Stein said he felt the agreement made with Orchard, Dividend and Standard threatens the viability of the traffic impact fee. No other public comments were offered at this time. Jerry Peeler explained that the circulation element of the General Plan consideration in the Fall will take care of changing any road sizes. Each facility will be returned to the Council in some fashion for design and specifications, particularly roadway sizes. Mayor Turner informed Mr. Stein that staff has considered the "circuit breaker" technique for levels of traffic. However, staff has concluded it is not practical for Livermore. Mayor Turner asked Mr. Peeler to respond to Mr. Spruiell's comment regarding the rebate program, and asked if the Council decided to pursue this, could it be done in the future? Jerry Peeler said that the Council can consider that as an amendment; however, in the short term the City should have some experience with the fee so that we can see what it does and then tailor the downtown to the ordinance. One million dollars has been included for a parking lot downtown, and all of the downtown will benefit from that. CM/43/300 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE TRIP RATES (Continued) Mayor Turner noted that if this resolution passes, the Council should consider setting up a date to meet with the downtown organizations through the Project Area Committee. Jerry Peeler said that given the fact the City has not had any experience dealing with the fee, we would expect to come back to the Council for amendments within 90 to 180 days. Rather than coming back to the Council for each separate amendment, staff will be returning with a list of amendments at certain intervals. In response to CM Brown's question as to whether the circulation element could be discussed at the same time as amendments to the traffic impact ordinance, Jerry Peeler said that appears to be about 120 days, and that it is a possibility. CM Brown said that she has supported the fee, but would like to see changes made on certain street sizes during the review of the circulation element. COUNCILMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO SUPPORT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION FOR A 20-YEAR BUILD-OUT PROGRAM, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, AND PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT). RESOLUTION NO. 190-88 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE PURSUANT TO LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.30.050 (20-Year Buildout) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #5247/PECK/ F & P ASSOCIATES This item was continued from the meeting of June 27, 1988. Tentative Parcel Map #5247, request of Bill Peck/F & P Properties, to subdivide a 25+/- acre industrial site into nine parcels. Location: At North Mines Road, north of Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way. Zoning District: I-3 (Heavy Industrial). General Plan: High Intensity Industrial. Previously submitted Environmental Impact Report consideration. CM/43/301 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #5247/PECK/F & P ASSOCIATES (Continued) Staff recommended instructions be given to file the environmental determination, require the applicant to furnish certified EIR to Caltrans and U.S. Fish and Wildlife, and approve the tentative map subject to conditions. Planning Director Bob Brown explained that this item was continued to permit staff and the applicant to prepare additional information regarding the future circulation of the area west of the project site. Access to the project site and the adjacent properties owned by Smith are currently being provided by Travarno Road. If the current project is approved, primary access to the site will be provided by Las Positas Road. The use of Travarno Road will be limited to a secondary access for emergency purposes only. The Smith property will continue to utilize Travarno Road for its primary means of access, but emergency access could be provided by the streets in this project. The unutilized right-of-way property does not currently have access to a public street. The portion of the abandoned right-of-way that is east of the future North Mines Road will utilize the proposed Peck Street. If any future development is proposed for the abandoned right-of-way that is west of the future North Mines Road, it will be necessary for the property owners to acquire access before any development can be approved. The applicant currently has a series of options to purchase the right-of-way when it is no longer being utilized by the railroad companies. Prior to any development of the railroad right-of-way in the area west of Travarno Road, and possibly the right-of-way between Travarno and North Mines Roads, it will be necessary for the property owner to extend the public street to the site. It appears the most desirable location for this street would be across the land currently being utilized by P.G. & E. as a corporation yard. This would create a four-way intersection with Portola Avenue and First Street. In order to provide a secondary access to the area, it will be necessary for the property owner to acquire the southerly portion of the Smith property to connect the street to the Peck Street extension being provided by this tentative parcel map. The Peck project has extended a public street to serve an area that previously was served only by Travarno Road. CM/43/302 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #5247/PECK/ F & P ASSOCIATES (Continued) While this does not provide the ideal solution to the circulation need of the area, staff supports the approval of this project because it will significantly improve the access to the area that was formerly served only by easements across Travarno Road. Mayor Turner opened the public hearing. Asa Syufy, Reimer Associates representing the applicant, displayed a plan which showed the street configurations, as well as the entire development. He noted that only the Smith property, with this plan, will need to use Travarno Road, and that the street previously noted in their plan as Pell Court has been removed since it is not a requirement for the approval of this map. Mr. Syufy said there is an agreement between F & P and the railroad to purchase the three surplus areas of right-of-way. Mr. William Cooper, resident on Travarno Road, said that this looks like a very positive plan. The Travarno residents welcome the fact that other access will be available to the properties to the south, and that Travarno Road will no longer be used for these properties. Maryanne Payne, representing Bart, said that she believes Caltrans is concerned with the compatibility of this development with Bart's long-range plans. She requested a copy of the final EIR. John Stein, Kathy Court, said there is a lot of land, but there are homes on Duke Way and to the west. He asked how this proposal would restrict moving the tracks since they need to go farther to the north. No other public comments were made at this time. Regarding the question by the Bart representative, Bob Brown stated that there is a response from Caltrans to the draft EIR; however, the question is what are Bart's long-term plans. From a physical standpoint, this site does not lend itself to a maintenance yard or a station site. CM/43/303 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP #5247/PECK/F & P ASSOCIATES (Continued) Mayor Turner pointed out that the other issue is the track movement to the north. The railroad dictates where Bart would be building their tracks and the City must work with the people in that area to not impact them any more than possible. John Hines said that the tracks are currently located about 40 feet from the fence, but it is more like 70 feet from the track to the bedrooms. The alignment is matched up so that he does not believe that the railroad could be relocated now. In response to Mayor Turner's question regarding Smith's use of Travarno Road, Bob Brown stated that the City has the ability to extinguish the lease, but that we can make it very easy for him to use an alternative route now through the Peck property and then to First Street. COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP MOVED TO ADOPT THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BROWN. No other comments were offered on the motion, and the public hearing was closed. THE MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT). ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-203 - SWIMMING POOL FENCES Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment #T-203, City-initiated, to revise the Zoning Ordinance regarding swimming pool fences; to bring the Zoning Ordinance into conformance with proposed revisions to the building regulations, Title 15 of the Municipal Code, expanding requirements to include a secondary fence. Negative Declaration consideration. AS A RESULT OF A REQUEST BY VICE MAYOR VARGAS, THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF JULY 25, ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT). CM/43/304 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #5645/WARMINGTON/ NORTHWOOD HOMES Tentative Tract Map #5645, request of Warmington Homes/Northwood Homes, to relocate 10 townhouse units from the west to the east of the main entry road and to revise house plans. Councilmember Bartoli has appealed the Planning Commission recommendation and wishes to consider the Visual Resources Policies in more detail. Location: North side of Portola Avenue, west of First Street. Parcel Size: 25+/- acres. Zoning District: PD (Planned Development). General Plan: Urban Low Medium (3 du/ac). Negative Declaration consideration based on prior Environmental Impact Report. Staff recommended that Council evaluate compliance of the project with the Visual Resources Policies. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment and revision to house plans; find the project in compliance with Visual Resources Policies, with instruction to file the environmental determination. Mayor Turner explained that CM Bartoli had made this appeal. However, he was unable to reach her and she did not leave any direction with staff. The Planning Department has determined that this is a minor impact, and the Planning Commission recommended approval of this amendment. CM Brown asked the Planning Director to explain the amendment further. Bob Brown explained that this is a request to amend a previously approved tentative map. It went to the Planning Commission, and as part of the staff's recommendation, they pointed out the terrain and suggested that the Commission reaffirm the visual resource policy for this amendment. Development of the site has already been approved. They want to make some minor changes and to relocate the townhouses and single-family homes. No new area is being proposed. The types of units, roadways, etc., do not change. CM/43/305 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #5645/WARMINGTON/NORTHWOOD HOMES Mr. Brown pointed out the land form in question. The Planning Commission concluded that this was not a major feature to be controlled by the visual resource policy. It is a rise and not a major ridge line. The developer is sensitive to the policy and, in response to that, has proposed as part of the Housing Implementation Program, to not develop the property to the west, which would allow the roadway to be dropped lower. The roadway will have units on either side. The proposal was to amend the plan so the road could drop lower, and therefore not build on the highest point. Mayor Turner opened the public hearing. Tom Sanbourne, representing Warmington Homes, informed the Council that they had redesigned the area and have resited the larger homes on custom lots. They are scattering the townhomes throughout the single family areas also. He pointed out that nothing has changed along the ridge relative to the modification; however, they are planning to drop the road lower as described by Mr. Brown. He urged the Council to deny the appeal and support the Planning Commission's recommendation. COUNCILMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO DENY THE APPEAL AND SUPPORT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP. CM Wieskamp asked Mr. Sanbourne what, if any, changes were made in the design of the development when the roadway was dropped lower. Mr. Sanbourne informed her that it eliminated two units. He also stated that they would set aside 30 acres for open space. THE MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT) AND THE APPEAL REGARDING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #5645 WAS DENIED, AND THE AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-196 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment #T-196, City-initiated, to amend the CN (Neighborhood Commercial) District to increase the maximum parcel size from 6 to 12 acres, consistent with the most recent amendments to the General Plan text. Negative Declaration based upon prior consideration. CM/43/306 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) ZONING ORDINAI~CE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-196 (Continued) The Planning Commission and staff recommended that the environmental determination be filed and the text amendment approved. Mayor Turner opened the public hearing. John Stein, Kathy Court, spoke against the amendment and inquired if a minimum size had been considered. He suggested that a three to four acre minimum would make a good number to support the zoning. Bob Brown said that a minimum was not set because the Council might decide that a 7-11 Store, for instance, or an AM-PM market is appropriate and important to serve the needs of a particular area. The staff feels that the General Plan is the place to make that decision. CM Brown said that she basically does not oppose the ordinance, but would not want to see it made easy to have small convenience markets throughout the City, and does not want to see this diluted by mini stores. Bob Brown pointed out that that will depend on how the Council elects to administer the ordinance. CM Wieskamp said that the Council could take these on a case-by-case basis, and as long as there is flexibility with the constraints of the General Plan it can be controlled. COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP MOVED TO ADOPT THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT, SECONDED BY MAYOR TURNER. NO OTHER PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE OFFERED, AND THE MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BROWN AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT). CM Brown noted for the record that she is supporting this amendment reluctantly. CM/43/307 .................... T-'""T1--T- .................. ~ ..... TI-- ......... T ..... ] ................ TI[ ................................ T ................. July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #T-197 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment #T-197, City-initiated, to amend the CS (Community Service) District and adopt a CHS (Commercial Highway Service) District to clarify the distinction between commercial and highway service uses. The Council may also consider amendments to Section 20.00, General Plan Provisions, necessary to incorporate the CHS District into the Zoning Ordinance. Negative Declaration based upon prior consideration. The Planning Commission and staff recommended that the environmental determination be filed and the text amendment approved. Mayor Turner opened the public hearing. Rich Henghold, Stonehenge Realtors, questioned the Council regarding the signage which is permitted for freeway-oriented businesses. He questioned whether or not the Council felt that business would be lost because of the sign restrictions. Bob Brown responded by stating that the ordinance does provide for signs along the highway, and staff did not change that part of the ordinance, just added this district. A business can get a sign taller than eight feet. There are two provisions and those for the freeway can go higher, but the surface businesses would have lower signage. No other public comments were offered. COUNCILMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO APPROVE THE STAFF AND PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THIS AMENDMENT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED AND THE MOTION PASSED BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT). 1988-89 PROPOSITION 4 APPROPRIATION LIMIT Hearing to consider adoption of resolution establishing 1988-89 Proposition 4 Appropriation Limit. This item was continued to the meeting of July 25 to allow the appropriate notification period of 15 days. CM/43/308 July 11, 1988 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CITIZENS FORUM Donald King, Dolores Street, spoke to the Council regarding the lack of affordable homes in Livermore. Roman Morkowski agreed with Mr. King. John Stein, Kathy Court, had the following comments: He suggested that the residents near the area of Portola and to the north should be informed as to the future plans for that area, and that a single agency should be designated to maintain the open space being dedicated to the City. Regarding move-up housing, the Growth Rate Policy Committee has decided that Livermore has done more than any other City to provide affordable housing. He commented that this evening's meeting has been very calm and even-paced, and suggested that when future agendas are very large, part of the business be put over to the following Monday or Tuesday. MATTERS INITIATED SIGN/GOLF COURSE In response to an inquiry by CM Wieskamp regarding signs proposed for installation at the Portola Park and 1-580 Golf Course, Mr. Horner advised that the sign ordinance issue will be placed on the July 25 City Council agenda. PROCLAMATIO~HANSEN PARK CM Wieskamp requested a proclamation be prepared for the citizen who repaired the wagon at Hansen Park. CITY-MAINTAINED FENCES CM Wieskamp suggested that the City consider adopting a policy which would require that all City-maintained fences be constructed of masonry. CM/43/309 July 11, 1988 MATTERS INITIATED (Continued) REALTOR/A-FRAME SIGNS CM Wieskamp asked staff to develop a solution to the realtor/a-frame sign issues. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Turner suggested that staff consider the possibility of scheduling public hearing meetings when the agendas are too large to handle a number of public hearings as well as the other agenda items. SIGNS - EAST AVENUE/MINES ROAD Mayor Turner asked that staff research the feasibility of installing signs for safety purposes at the East Avenue/Mines Road intersection. He said the bikers, joggers, walkers are in danger. SECOND STREET PARKING LOT Mayor Turner said VM Vargas asked him to bring up the matter of the Second Street restaurant parcel which the Redevelopment Agency has considered condemning for a parking lot. Jerry Peeler explained that the restaurant owner has applied for a $50,000 grant improvement loan. The problem is that the property is part of the Garden Court Plaza. A determination is needed to decide if that project is going forward. CM Brown said she has a problem taking property when a business owner is willing to improve his site. 1-580/680 INTERCHANGE Mayor Turner asked the Council to support sending letters to Caltrans and our legislative representatives regarding the 1-580/680 accident rate, asking that patrol be increased and other means be implemented to slow down the traffic. CONSENT CAr~NDAR ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT), THE CONSENT CALENDAR WAS APPROVED AS FOLLOWS: CM/43/310 July 11, 1988 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) SECOND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT OF 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 191-88 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN (1988 - Second General Plan Amendment) TTM #5906/CALDEIRA & JONES RESOLUTION NO. 192-88 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Tract Map #5906 - C.U.P. #112-88) TTM #5911/MASON/ SMITH/ROBERTSON This item was deleted from the agenda and continued to the meeting of July 25. BID AWARD/ANNUAL AUDIT SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 193-88 A RESOLUTION AWARDING BID AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT (Audit Services) JUNE 7 ELECTION/ MEASURE K RESOLUTION NO. 194-88 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING CANVASS OF VOTES ON MEASURE K AT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION OF JUNE 7, 1988 (Yes Votes = 5,464 No Votes = 6,298) CM/43/311 July 11, 1988 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) FINAL ACCEPTANCE/TM #5462 RESOLUTION NO. 195-88 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE (Tract #5462) FINAL ACCEPTANCE/TM #5469 RESOLUTION NO. 196-88 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE (Tract #5469) FINAL ACCEPTANCE/TM #5643 RESOLUTION NO. 197-88 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE (Tract #5643) LOW INCOME HOUSING AGREEMENT/VILLA CHARDONNAY INVESTORS RESOLUTION NO. 198-88 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT (Villa Chardonnay Investors/College Commons) AGREEMENT/PROPERTY ACQUISITION/VILLA CHARDONNAY INVESTORS RESOLUTION NO. 199-88 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT (Villa Chardonnay Investors/College Commons)) CDBG PROGRAM/CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PLAN The Council approved the Citizens Participation Plan in connection with the Community Development Block Grant Program upon the recommendation of the Social Concerns Committee. CM/43/312 July 11, 1988 CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued) AMENDMENT TO RESOLU- TION REGARDING PARKING RESTRICTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 200-88 A RESOLUTION SUPERCEDING RESOLUTION NO. 66-88, WHICH ESTABLISHED A COMPILATION OF RESTRICTED PARKING ZONES BY ADDING AND DELETING CERTAIN DESIGNATIONS WITHIN THE RESTRICTED PARKING ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF LIVERMORE REJECTING CLAIMS RESOLUTION NO. 201-88 A RESOLUTION REJECTING CLAIM (Robert Halleck) RESOLUTION NO. 202-88 A RESOLUTION REJECTING CLAIM Dwight and Cindy Fairchild SUMMARY MINUTES The Planning meeting minutes of May 17, 1988, were received. PAYROLL AND CLAIMS There were claims in the amount of $741,597.94 and $480,400.22, dated June 24 and June 30, 1988. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was discussion regarding a lease agreement with First Venture Restaurants to operate the restaurant at the Las Positas Golf Course. No action was required, and the item was continued to July 25. CM/43/313 July 11, 1988 ORDINANCES ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT), THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCES WERE ADOPTED. REZONING #Z-369/ROBLES ORDINANCE NO. 1268 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED, OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00 THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES (Rezoning - Z-369) PREZONING #Z-365 (Portions of Lomitas Avenue) ORDINANCE NO. 1269 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED, OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00 THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES (Prezoning - Z-365) REZONING #Z-366/ROBERTSON ORDINANCE NO. 1270 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED, OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00 THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES (Rezoning - Z-366) REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1081 ORDINANCE NO. 1271 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE 1081 WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE 442 AS AMENDED RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES (REPEALING RR-1 PREZONING ON 1591, 1605 AND 1653 LOMITAS AVENUE) REZONING #Z-375 (2489 College Avenue) This item was continued to the meeting of July 25, 1988. CM/43/314 July 11, 1988 ORDINANCES (Continued) ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 2.20 ON MOTION OF COUNCILMEMBER WIESKAMP, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BROWN, AND BY A 3-0 VOTE (COUNCILMEMBER BARTOLI AND VICE MAYOR VARGAS ABSENT), THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED. ORDINANCE NO. 1272 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.20.010 (BONDS REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN OFFICERS) OF CHAPTER 2.20 (OFFICERS' BONDS) OF TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) OF THE LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL CODE WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS The Councilmembers requested additional information regarding the feasibility of adopting local water conservation guidelines as recommended by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Committee for Water Policy Consensus. NEW BUSINESS BART STATION/USE FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES A request was received by John Regan to use the former Bart station lot on Stanley Boulevard for Christmas tree sales for the 1988 Christmas season. The Council instructed staff to work with Mr. Regan to negotiate an agreement for the use of that site. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. to a public meeting to be held on July 18, 7:00 p.m., City Council Chamb)~r~, to receive public comment and input regarding interest in ~lac~ng another Gann Limitation Measure on the November 8 ba~lot.~ CM/43/315