Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutTBP 2023-05-03g A, COLO Et i la 0' Board of Trustees Workshop and Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday May 3, 2023 6:00 PM- 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnI7d-kk0j1 cxV28DSq Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Information https://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting 10:259 040 8013 Phone 1-346-248-7799 1. 6:00 P.M. Workshop - Water Capital Improvement Plan - Lucus Documents: Water Su.alpplly Sllddo' .pdff F'rraseir 10 Year Water CLIP .042'1 Pdff 2. 7:00 R.M. Roll Call 3. Approval Of Agenda 4. Consent Agenda a. Minutes April 19, 2023 Documents: g..0M 2023.04.-114,.E.Pd1 `3 qua Ilan 'Sheet Aprlll 19, 2023.IPdff 5. Open Forum a. Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on a future agenda please contact the Town Clerk) 6. Proclamation Annual Professional Municipal Clerks Week - Philip Documents: Proclla:amaatilora Ararauuall Profess ° Muunilcihp all lbt.lc 7. Discussion And Possible Action Regarding a. Resolution 2023-05-01 Contract With Raftelis For Water And Wastewater Rate Study - Lucus Documents: Staff Merino IR.a:ata' nDtuudy.lpcff e, llu'tijorn 2023-05.01 Contract vVirth RafteOhs For Walter And VVa,Slfe teir R.u:ate Stiuudy.pdff R.af'telllihs 1Proposall.Ipatf b. Resolution 2023-05-02 Construction And Inspections Agreement With Merrick - Paul Documents: Staff Brheffiirna IMeirirtck Consllructhon And Ilinslpecta: n Contract ffprtff ffkr:.sollu'tilon 2023-05.02 Autlhnorii2iinq The Town Manager To Execute The 2023 Coriistructtorn And Ilinslpe ctiloins Agreement Wilflhn VMDerrilclk..pdff Prolposa:all For 2023 Coinslliruuctihoin III aingement And Onslpectuoin Servuc s.lpdff c. Ordinance No. 498 Amending Chapter 13 Article 2 Regarding Water Meters - Paul Documents: Staff IBrtefing Cho alter. 13 Walter M ters.pdf Ordihn ante. INo. t t Amendung Chapter 13 Artihe» 2 fro- ff :arditng Water Meters.pdf d. Joint Facilities Oversight Committee Agenda Review - Michael And Joe Documents: 1„ 2023.05-11 J FOf A.1pdf e. Mountain Parks Electric Director Election Documents: IMRE° Dhstrhcht t t; uarnatildrato-a,:~r Board Of ICDirectors.patff 8. Updates a. Committee Minutes Documents: EIDACM 04i.-25.2;3.IPdt' PAC 03 1" ' 23.IPdt PAC 04 l4. 23.IPdt 9. Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 2023 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Board Staff Direct: Define the service, product or value Lead: Future focused planning to be delivered Protect: Establish the operational Manage: Now focused policy and procedural boundaries to be respected by Staff and monitored by the Board guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on target service delivery Enable: Advocacy, resource development, Accomplish: Ensure the work defined by the and role discipline direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished Please contact the Town Clerk to request accommodations to assist people with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Listening devices for people with hearing impairment are available upon request. Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh 970-531-9943 or amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us *Numbers based on 10 -Year CIP Draft ** Number ba sed on 2020 Water Supply Rep ort SFEs are Approximate and Based on Best Practices and Best Ava ilable Data Fraser Wa ter Right Booster Pumps 1300 to 2800 SFE** North System SFE Capacity by Appurtenance Wellfield 820 SFE** Limit set by Max Day Demand Limit set by Winter Production Water Treatment 1000 SFE May be adjusted by increasing C12 Residua l Official SFE = 948 SFE By Address = 1231 North System Maryvale SFE = 200 Storage Tank 1 Million Gallons 4 Days Supply Mid Summer or 1 Fire Engine for 10 hours (3000 gpm for 3 hours and 130 % Max Day Demand*) 600 SFE* * 900 EQR* Limit set by Single Pump Offline Limit Fire Flow Requirements *Numbers based on 10 -Year CIP Draft ** Number based on 2020 Water Supply Report EQRs are Approx imate and Based on Best Practices and Best Available Data Maryvale Augmen tatio n Plan Additional Augmentation Needed For Full Buildout Legal Supply Limit 1597 gpm** 2822 EQR** Limit set by Decree South System EQR Capacity by Appurtenance Wellfield Safe Yield 241 GPM** 2022 Max Day Demand 235 gpm* 840 EQR** CLEARWELL PLAN TO C s 8541.0 0 St or age T anks 0.8 Million Gallons Water Treatme nt Max CT 0.5 ppm C12 700 gpm 1220 EQR May be adjusted by increasing C12 Residua l Booster P umps Safe Yield 302 GPM 2022 Max Day Demand 242 gpm * 670 EQR** Limit set by Single Pump Offline Official EQR = 571 EQR By Address = 694 North System Grand Park EQR = 200 10 Days Supply Mid Summer or 1 Fire Engine for 8 hours (3000 gpm for 3 hours and 130% Max Day Demand*) 484 EQR* Limit set by Demand and Fire Flow Requirements turrorrommortrommortmortmortmortmortmortmortmortmortmortromortmormormortmortmortmortmortmortmortmortmortmortmorto S - • North Treatment Plant, Additional Booster Pump • North System, 1-2 Additional Wells within 5 Years • Additional Storage Tanks in Both Systems • OoTSA Buildout, Additional Water Supply and Treatment • South System, Additional Booster Pump in 5 Years • South System, 1-2 Additional Wells in 10 -Years • Augmentation Reservoir, Prior to Buildout 1 14, uvimou 11111 11 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 11 11111111111111111 11 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 11 1 11 11 111 11 111 11 11 April 2023 sr�,r�r Prepared by Merrick and Company 0.0 MERRICK' r" Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This 10 -Year Water Capital Improvements Projects Report for the Town of Fraser analyzed the existing water infrastructure of the Town related to water supply and the distribution system. Demand projections for the next 10 -years were made based on future development in the Town. Development in the Town is bringing significant demand increases and stress to the existing water system. Based on the estimated demand projections and analysis of the existing system, capital improvement projects (CIP) are recommended to continue to provide high quality water service to the Town. Based on the analysis it appears that many of the assets in the Town are past their industry standard useful life and should be scheduled for replacement. This CIP represents a data -driven analysis for the Town to utilize in addressing water infrastructure needs. DDD ERRICK® DOD Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 Population 2 1.4 Summary of Water Rights 3 2 Water System Infrastructure 4 2.1 North Well Field Water Supply and Treatment 7 2.2 North Water Treatment Plant 10 2.2.1 Future Surface Water Treatment Plant 10 2.3 North System Storage and Distribution 10 2.3.1 North System Storage Tanks 12 2.4 South Well Field Water Supply and Treatment 13 2.5 South Water Treatment Plant 15 2.6 South System Storage and Distribution 15 2.6.1 South System Storage Tanks 17 2.7 Condition and Status of Existing Water Infrastructure Assets 18 3 Existing Conditions 19 3.1 Indoor Demands 19 3.2 Existing Demand Data and Land Use Schedules 19 3.2.1 Existing Water Demand 20 3.2.2 Land Use Schedules 21 4 Future Projections 22 4.1 Future Buildout Areas 22 4.2 Demand Projections 23 5 Capital Improvement Plan 26 5.1 2023 CIP 31 5.2 2024 CIP 31 5.3 2025 CIP 32 5.4 2026 CIP 32 5.5 2027 CIP 33 5.6 2028 CIP 33 °°o ERRICK® ❑❑❑ ii Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 5.7 2029 CIP 34 5.8 2030 CIP 34 5.9 2031 CIP 35 5.10 2032 CIP 35 Appendices Appendix A — Reference Material Appendix B — Asset Database, Unconstrained Model, Constrained Model � 5$ of Fab es Table 1- North System Storage Requirements 12 Table 2 - South System Storage Requirements 17 Table 3 — Single -Family, Mixed -Use Residential, and Commercial SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser) 19 Table 4 — Multi -Family Residential SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser) 20 Table 5 - Annual Water Delivered and Nonrevenue Water, 2017-2021 20 Table 6 — Fraser 10 -Year SFE/EQR Projections 23 Table 7 — Fraser 10 -Year Demand Projections 25 Table 8 - Fraser Well Field Capacity 25 Table 9 - Capital Improvement Projects 27 Lush of Hgures Figure 1 —Town of Fraser population, historic and 10 -year projection [U.S. Census Bureau] 2 Figure 2 — Pressure Zone Map 5 Figure 3 — Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) Diagram 6 Figure 4 — North Well Field 8 Figure 5 — NTP Average Monthly Production (2019-2021) 9 Figure 6 — North Distribution System 11 Figure 7 — STP Average Monthly Production (2019-2021) 13 Figure 8 — South Well Field 14 Figure 9 — South Distribution System 16 Figure 10 - Unconstrained Model 29 Figure 11- Constrained Model 30 DDD ERRICK® DOD iii Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report Lust of Aobrevua ons ADD Average Day Demand AF Acre-feet AF/yr Acre-feet per year AMI Automated metering infrastructure bgs Below ground surface cfs Cubic feet per second CWCB Colorado Water Conservation Board EQR Equivalent Residential Unit gpcd Gallons per capita per day gpm Gallons per minute MDD Maximum Day Demand MG Million gallons MGD Million gallons per day msl Mean sea level PHD Peak Hour Demand PFAS Polyfluoroalkyl substances SFE Single Family Equivalent Town Town of Fraser Ora o°o ERRICK® DOD iv Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide the Town of Fraser (Town) a 10 -Year Water Capital Improvements Project (10 -Year CIP) Report. The main objectives of this 10 -Year Water CIP are as follows: • Summarize water supply system needs for the Town of Fraser based on the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) and bundle items into CIPs as needed. • Identify existing water infrastructure that, according to industry standard useful life, needs repair or replacement and bundle into CIPs as needed; and • Work with Town Leadership to identify the highest priority projects with associated costs and assign a proposed timeline for implementation. The 10 -Year Water CIP project was identified by the Town as critical due to ongoing concerns, which particularly include the following: future supply needs, adequate water supply and distribution infrastructure for future growth, and ongoing operations and maintenance issues. Please note that a detailed examination of water rights is outside the scope of this project. For additional information regarding the Town's water rights, refer to the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) included in Appendix A. 1.2 Background The Town's municipal water supply facilities are comprised of two independent systems: (1) the North System, which generally supplies geographic areas of the Town known as Old Town Fraser, and the Byers Peak Properties development; and (2) the South System which supplies areas of the Town encompassing the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments. Both systems operate with their own raw water supply well fields, water treatment plants, and distribution infrastructure. However, there is a physical water main connection along Old Victory Rd. that, through operation of pressure reducing valves, can allow for water exchanges in the event of emergencies (wildfires, etc.). At this time, majority of development is within the original boundaries of the Town and has been well established for some time. Fraser is primarily a residential town with a year-round population as well as seasonal population of second homeowners, visitors, and tourists. The Town is comprised of residential homes, both single and multi -family, townhome complexes and commercial areas. Public facilities include the Town Hall, the public library, a sports complex, grade school, and fire district. The Town also has 120 acres of open space along the Fraser River and Cozens Ranch Open Space. Future development includes housing for the growing population, new commercial development, and redevelopment of various properties throughout the Town. Both year-round and seasonal populations are expected to increase in coming years. Several areas of Rendezvous have been developed on the east side of Highway 40; currently the development mix is mostly single-family homes. In the future, development in Rendezvous will include both single family and multi -family homes to provide for an economically diverse community. There are also plans for hotels to accommodate seasonal visitors to the ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report area, both for the winter ski season and for summer outdoor activities. A small commercial area is planned to serve the needs of the people living nearby as well as some designated open space areas. Grand Park development plans include housing for the anticipated growing population, both full-time and seasonal residents. Like Rendezvous, there will be both single and multi -family homes, as well as hotel lodging. It is anticipated that there will be a small commercial and retail area and the possibility of a golf course in the Grand Park area. 1.3 Population According to the U.S. Census, by 2000 Fraser had a population of 910 in the Town, the largest ever, and an increase of 58.3% from ten years prior. In following Census years, growth has remained steady increasing to a population of 1,224 in 2010 (3.5% growth annually) and 1,400 in 2020 (1.4% growth annually). Refer to Figure 1 below for a graphical representation of population growth. The Colorado State Demography Office forecasts future population trends for each county within the state through the year 2050. During that time, the population of Grand County is expected to increase by an average of 1.03% per year. Based on an average population growth of 1.03% per year for Grand County, the projected population for the Town in the year 2032 is 1,584. Because of the expected, steady population increase, the Town is carefully planning for the influx of both full-time and seasonal residents moving to the area. Due to its mountain location, the Town experiences seasonal population fluctuations. The main draw for visitors in the winter is the nearby Winter Park Ski Resort. Generally, the ski resort is open from mid - November through mid -April. The peak of the ski season in February and March brings many tourists to the area. Because the Town is close by, many people find accommodations there, causing a peak seasonal population during this time. Summer also draws visitors to the area for other recreational activities such as mountain biking, fishing, and hiking. To maintain and serve these seasonal population fluctuations, as well as support the year-round community members, the Town carefully plans for accommodations and services, including potable water. 1,400 1,200 800 400 200 910 0 Popullation Data 1,224 2 X71;7 1,584 1,400 )20 03 Figure 1 --- Town of Fraser opulation, historic and 10• -year projection [U.S. Census Bureau] ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 1,4 Summary of Water Rights The following paragraphs are taken from Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) to provide a summary of existing water rights. The Town of Fraser's North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the "Fraser Wells") with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. The total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed a pumping rate of 2.28 cubic feet per second (cfs). Pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town and are "exchange to" structures for the Town's decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out -of -priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. The Town of Fraser's South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed, and currently includes four active wells (Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 7) with 1999 appropriation dates. These wells supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. The wells are included in the Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation ("Maryvale Augmentation Plan") which was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties (up to 2,822 equivalent residential units ("EQRs") and irrigate 17 acres). The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the Cozens Ditch water right, which was changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage from the Maryvale Reservoir or Grand Park Ponds. Refer to the Existing Conditions section of this report for additional information regarding the EQRs for the South System (HRS Water Consultants, Inc., August 12, 2022). The north area of the Grand Park development, which includes a total of 184 EQRs, is currently served by the blue pressure zone of the North System. This area is intended to be transitioned to the South System to be served under the Fraser-Maryvale water rights. It is understood that projects to advance the transition of the 184 EQRs in Grand Park from the North System to the South System are a high priority as well as developing the Town's St. Louis Creek water rights as a source of non -potable water supply. The Town also owns surface water rights on the St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension Ditch and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. These ditches are decreed for irrigation purposes. Additionally, the Town owns reservoir water storage capacity for replacement and exchange purposes in reservoirs located at Fraser, Grand County Water and Sanitation District Reservoir No. 2, and at other downstream reservoirs (HRS Water Consultants, Inc., August 12, 2022). The Town of Fraser has undertaken no significant water rights projects since the Water Supply Master Plan was completed in 2008 (Brown and Caldwell, January 18, 2008). For this effort, when evaluating water CIPs, and with confirmation from the Town, the same projects recommended in 2008 are still relevant today. ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 2 WATER SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE Ora This section summarizes the existing infrastructure and facilities currently in use for supply, treatment, and distribution of the Town's potable water system. For clarification purposes the following designations for the two water systems operated by the Town will be used throughout: 1) North System - The water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities within the original boundaries of the Town (also referred to as the Fraser System), and 2) South System - The water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities within the Rendezvous and Grand Park portions of Town (also referred to as the Fraser-Maryvale System). As indicated in Section 1 - Introduction, the systems operate independently with their own raw water supply well fields, water treatment plants, and distribution infrastructure. In the event of water emergencies, including wildfires, there is a physical water main connection along Old Victory Rd. that, through operation of pressure reducing valves, could allow for water exchanges. The Town of Fraser's Design Criteria and Construction Standards (2021) identifies important information about the water system. The combined water system consists of five pressure zones, water supply wells, booster pump stations, water treatment facilities and water storage tanks. The five pressure zones and the elevations of their respective service areas are described as follows: • Blue Pressure Zone (8,600 to 8,680 ft above mean sea level (msl)) • Yellow Pressure Zone (8,680 to 8,860 ft msl) • Green Pressure Zone (8,860 to 9,080 ft msl) • Red Pressure Zone (9,080 to 9,300 ft msl) • Purple Pressure Zone (9,300 to 9,460 ft msl) Figure 2 shows a map of the Town's existing pressure zones. The blue, yellow, green, and red zones are shown on the figure. The purple zone has been proposed for future development, but it is not yet shown on the figure. Figure 3 shows the Town's existing system in terms of hydraulic grade. The diagram is called a Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) and depicts water assets according to their elevation. The HGL diagram is useful for showing how the water assets are related and connected. When new assets, such as water storage tanks, are installed, this diagram is helpful to show elevations and relationships within pressure zones to sustain fill and drain rates for water storage tanks. The diagram is a living document that should be updated when new assets are added or when updated survey information is obtained. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 000 o o MERRICK` ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Figure 2 — Pressure Zo ne M p Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report MEAN SURFACE ELEVATION (FEET) 10,000 9500 9000 8500 8000 Dm ID -ID MERRICK` ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 FRASER - NORTH VE SFNEM 'n Rn FRASER - SOUTH 6E;OW GRADE D.A., O= RENDEZVOUS 244 :04 NORTH WELL FIELD NOS A Z VA G N. PEEL AC SOUTH WELL FIELD CH.. . H AE4 RAFFLE N' :^C RAFFLES CC4i4f04 _LE61444-LL FRASER SYSTEM TREATMENT FACILITY 224 s="474MG0 COMMON CLENENNELL 7400.22 2.43 22474 22 4 ON JAM OPE Figure 3 — Hydraulic Grade Erne (HGL) Diagram 7470 22422E 027223-7 EL 8550 - FRASER CITY LIMIT ABBREVIATIONS 20 EE' 7 ! 427 F CLR GAL GALL ON CM CALMS 22442044 4h - Rf._F) G377004RER.?7 02)4 C:E3 12'47 7480 7450 7440 7430 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report Ora As shown on Figure 3, three existing water storage tanks and a series of pumps provide the water pressure necessary to operate the systems. The Blue Zone tank is a 1 MG underground, concrete storage tank located at the northeast corner of Town. The overflow of the Blue Zone tank is at elevation 8,795 ft msl (NGVD 29 Datum) (Town of Fraser, 2021). The Yellow Zone tank is located within the Rendezvous Development on the east side of Highway 40. It currently serves portions of development on East Mountain (Rendezvous) and West Mountain (Grand Park), with US Hwy 40 being the division line. The existing Yellow Zone tank is a 0.3 MG underground, post -tensioned concrete tank with an overflow elevation of 8,964.2 ft msl (NGVD 29 Datum). The Green Zone tank is located within the Rendezvous Development on the east side of Highway 40. It currently serves a portion of the development on East Mountain (Rendezvous). The existing Green Zone tank is a 0.5 MG underground, prestressed concrete tank with an overflow at elevation 9,174 ft msl (NGVD 29 Datum). The Red Pressure Zone within Rendezvous is served by booster pumps at the Green Zone tank location. Water storage tanks are planned for the Grand Park area (also called West Mountain) and does not yet exist. The intent would be to develop and install water storage tanks in advance of the development to meet flow, pressure, and fire flow requirements. The intent would be to install water storage tanks at lower elevations and pump up to water storage tanks at the higher elevations. It is anticipated that yellow, red, and purple zones will be required in the Grand Park development. It is anticipated that the developer would pay for additional water storage tanks. The existing Yellow and Green Zones are connected by booster pumps for lifting water from the Yellow Zone to the Green Zone and by two pressure reducing valves (PRVs). The PRV will operate if a low-pressure level is recorded in the lower distribution system. In the event of a fire in the Yellow Zone, the water stored in the Green Zone tank is available for fire flow requirements (Ord. 389 Part 1.1., 2012). 2.1 North Well Field Water Supply and Treatment The following well information can be found in the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020). The North Well Field is an alluvial well field that consists of seven production wells (Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(b), 5, 7, 8, and 9) drilled to various depths within the aquifer. The raw water is pumped to a common clearwell at the North Treatment Plant (NTP) where it is metered and treated prior to distribution. The North Well Field spans the majority of the original Town limits, with wells focused along the east and west sides of the Fraser River. Snowmelt is the primary source of recharge to the aquifer. Due to the shallow nature of the alluvium, the well field could be susceptible to the influence of surface water, which would require advanced water treatment processes, mainly filtration. Well No. 9 is notably the shallowest well with a screened interval between 26' and 48' below ground surface (bgs). Figure 4 provides an overview of the North System well field and major infrastructure components associated with the system (HRS Water Consultants, Inc., 2020). ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report Well No. 5r Well No. 9 Treatment Plant Production Wells Transmission Lines 4" DIP 6" DIP 8" DIP 6" PVC Treatment Plant Well No. 3a ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Figure 4 — North Well Field Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 101 The North Well Field wells were completed in the 1980s to various depths ranging from approximately 47 to 177 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the Fraser River Alluvium. Currently Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3b, 5, and 8 are on-line and are meeting the water supply needs of Town. The two wells that are not online are Well No. 7, which requires maintenance, and Well No. 9, which is out temporarily due to State Mandated Per- and Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) monitoring. Town staff anticipate Well No. 7 will be brought on-line in 2023. Wells 3a and 4 are low -producing and are not used. Currently all the wells are metered individually, and they have recently been equipped with pressure transducers to collect drawdown data. The North Well Field wells operate in response to lowered water levels in the Blue Zone Tank. Due to low well production, the Town maintains a minimum amount of drawdown in the Blue Zone tank to have sufficient storage for peak demands and fire flows. The wells are run on single speed pumps for an average of 10-14 hours per day to meet Town demand. Production data for the NTP System was available for years 2019 to 2021. Average monthly production data were calculated, showing the seasonal variations in water demand in the Town, shown in Figure 5. The highest water production data occurs during the summer irrigation months. Figure 5 -- NTP Average Monthly Production (2019-202.1.) ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 2..2 North Water Treatment Plant The current water treatment facility was constructed in 1996 to provide a common point of disinfection before storage in the Blue Zone concrete storage tank. Groundwater from the North Well Field flows through supply lines to a common pipeline at the clearwell facility. Production from the wells is measured through a magnetic flowmeter which records instantaneous and total gallons pumped from the well field. Groundwater is disinfected with liquid chlorine in the clearwell via a peristaltic pump to maintain a chlorine residual of 0.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) at the clearwell discharge point. The clearwell has a serpentine baffling pattern to ensure sufficient chlorine contact time. The clearwell volume at a depth of 10 feet is approximately 22,200 gallons. After chlorination the water is conditioned with soda ash for stabilization and aerated for radon treatment as necessary. 2.2.1 Future Surface Water Treatment Plant As part of the Fraser Firming Project Study prepared in 2015, by JRS Engineering and HRS Consultants, a new surface water treatment plant has been identified as a potential improvement to the North System. The firming study identified two options for the treatment facility; 1) Facility located at Gold Medal Ranch near Gaskill Ditch Headgate, 2) Facility located at the existing Blue Zone facility. If the facility were to be located at the existing Blue Zone facility, it would require roughly 9,400 linear feet of raw water transmission main to be installed. For this CIP the most expensive option was assumed. This Surface Water Treatment Plant is proposed as a capital improvement project in Section - 5 later in the document. This treatment plant would be a beneficial use of the Town's water rights for St. Louis Creek. 2.3 North System Storage and Distribution After treatment at the NTP, the water is pumped to a one million gallon (MG) underground concrete storage tank for storage and distribution. The clearwell building houses two booster pumps, one duty and one standby, necessary for lifting the water from the clearwell to the storage tank. The concrete storage tank was built in 1986 and provides storage and pressure required for distribution throughout the Blue pressure zone. The distribution system consists of a single zone (Blue Zone) with no additional booster stations. The treatment and distribution system are monitored with a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. The SCADA system allows the operator to view the status of the system and alarms including chlorine residual, tank levels, power failure, and security of the clearwell building. Groundwater flow rate from the well field is controlled by the receiving tank level which is monitored by the SCADA system. The SCADA system controls the automatic start-up and shutdown of the groundwater well pumps based on tiered flow increments. Figure 6 provides an overview of the North Distribution System and major infrastructure components associated with the system. ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report Pressure Reducing Valves (PRV) Treatment Plant Storage Tanks Pump Stations Pressure Reducing Valves (PRV) 1Treatmen -Plant PRV, Not °' Functional Distribution Pipes 4" DIP 6" DIP 8" DIP 10" DIP 12" DIP 14" DIP 16" DIP 8" PVC 10" PVC 12" PVC 4" Transite 6" Transite of oN 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Storage Tank af,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Figure 6 North Distribution System Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 2.3.1 North System Storage Tanks The North System currently has one storage tank in the Blue Zone with 1 MG capacity. Storage tanks must be sized to meet domestic demands and fire flow demands per CDPHE. The following assumptions have been made and are consistent with the 2008 Water Supply Master Plan and East Grand County Fire Protection District Code: • Maximum Day Demand (MDD) calculated as 1.5 times the Average Day Demand (ADD) • Fire Flow Demand assumed to be 3,000 gpm for three hours (540,000 gallons) • Operational Volume assumed to be 30% of MDD • Required Storage is a total of these three: MDD, Fire Flow and Operational Volume The required storage was analyzed with the anticipated growth and development. The future development (SFEs) in the Town of Fraser is projected in Section 4 below. Future Average Day Demands are calculated based on 300 gpd per SFE and described in Section 4 below. The required storage and storage provided are compared with surplus or deficit in storage volume listed. Based on these calculations it appears there is currently insufficient capacity in the North System Blue Zone. It is anticipated that the Byers Peak Ranch development, in the Blue Zone, will require its own storage tank. Hydraulic modeling is recommended to confirm sufficient fire flow is available while meeting minimum required pressures of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) at all other points in the system. See Table 1 for North System Storage Requirements. Table 1 North System Storage Requirements North System Year ADD MDD Fire Flow Operational Volume Required Storage Storage Provided Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons 2022 292,500 438,750 540,000 131,625 1,110,375 1,000,000 (110,375) 2023 378,630 567,945 540,000 170,384 1,278,329 1,000,000 (278,329) 2024 464,760 697,140 540,000 209,142 1,446,282 1,000,000 (446,282) 2025 499,440 749,160 540,000 224,748 1,513,909 1,000,000 (513,909) 2026 527,120 790,681 540,000 237,204 1,567,885 1,000,000 (567,885) 2027 554,801 832,201 540,000 249,660 1,621,861 1,000,000 (621,861) 2028 582,481 873,721 540,000 262,116 1,675,837 1,000,000 (675,837) 2029 610,161 915,241 540,000 274,572 1,729,813 1,000,000 (729,813) 2030 637,841 956,761 540,000 287,028 1,783,790 1,000,000 (783,790) 2031 665,521 998,281 540,000 299,484 1,837,766 1,000,000 (837,766) 2032 693,201 1,039,802 540,000 311,940 1,891,742 1,000,000 (891,742) ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 2.4 South Well Field Water Supply and Treatment The following well information can be found in the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020). The South Well Field is comprised of four Troublesome Formation bedrock wells, Maryvale Well Nos. El through E4, and referred to by the State Engineer as Well No. 1. (E4), Well No. 4 (E3), Well No. 5 (El), and Well No. 7 (E2). The wells were completed in the Troublesome Formation between 2000 and 2001, and the raw water is pumped to a common clearwell at the South Water Treatment Plant (STP). The Large Capacity Wells are tributary to the Fraser River and its tributaries. Figure 8 provides an overview of the South Well Field and major infrastructure components associated with the system. The current South Well Field is located on the east side of Highway 40. The principal production zones are generally 30 to 35 feet in thickness overlain by 30 to 40 feet of Troublesome Bedrock (Resource Engineering, May 2001), and total depths range from 200 to 280 feet bgs. The Troublesome Formation in this area is an aquitard that separates the Fraser River Alluvium from the underlying Troublesome Bedrock. This layer is leaky which allows some vertical percolation from the Fraser River Alluvium to the Troublesome and is likely a major source of recharge to the well field. Currently all the wells are metered individually, and they have recently been equipped with pressure transducers to collect drawdown data. The South Well Field is operated in a similar fashion to the North Well Field. Each of the four wells are turned on when the STP clearwell calls for water based on a call from one of the South System storage tanks. Future demands from both the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments will require additional wells to be drilled. Production data for the South System was available for years 2019 to 2021. Average monthly production data were calculated, showing the seasonal variations in water demand in the Town, shown in Figure 7. The highest water production data occurs during the summer irrigation months. Figure 7.-.-STP Average Monthly Production (20.19-2021) af,oo MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Average Monthly Production, STP (2019-2027.) Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 101 Treatment Plant Well No. Treatment Plant Production Wells Transmission Lines 4" DIP 6" DIP 8" DIP 6" PVC Well No. 4 ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Figure 8 ----South Well Field Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 2..5 South Water Treatment Plant Ora Groundwater from the South Well Field flows through supply lines to a common pipeline at the clearwell facility. Water pumped from the South wells is piped to the STP. The current water treatment facility was constructed in 2003 by the Town to provide a common point of disinfection before pumping water to the Green and Yellow Zone storage tanks. Production from the wells is measured through a magnetic flowmeter which records instantaneous and total gallons pumped from the well field. Groundwater is disinfected with liquid chlorine in the clearwell via a peristaltic pump to maintain a chlorine residual of 0.5 mg/L at the clearwell discharge point. The clearwell has as serpentine baffling pattern for sufficient chlorine contact time. The clearwell volume at a depth of 10 feet is approximately 27,270 gallons. After chlorination the water is conditioned with soda ash for stabilization and aerated for radon treatment as necessary. 2..6 South System Storage and Distribution After treatment at the STP, the water is pumped into the Yellow Zone. The clearwell building houses two booster pumps, one duty and one standby pump, necessary for lifting the water from the clearwell to the Yellow Zone tank and the Green Zone booster station. The Green Zone booster station houses two booster pumps, one duty and one standby pump, necessary for lifting the water from the Yellow Zone to the Green Zone tank and the Red Zone. Within the Green Zone, a portion of water is sent to the 0.5 MG Green Zone tank and the rest is pumped and pressurized into the Red Zone using four pumps of various sizes. The South System is broken into three zones, Yellow, Green, and Red, corresponding to specific elevations described earlier in this section. As with the North System, the South treatment and distribution systems are monitored by SCADA including chlorine residual, tank levels, power failures, and security of the clearwell building. Groundwater flow rate from the well field is controlled by the tank levels which are monitored by the SCADA system. The SCADA system controls the automatic start-up and shutdown of the groundwater well pumps based on tiered flow increments. Figure 9 provides an overview of the South Distribution System and major infrastructure components associated with the system. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report Treatment Plant Storage Tanks Pump Stations Zi Pressure Reducing Valves (PRV) Distribution Pipes 16" DIP 4" DIP 8" PVC 6" DIP 10" PVC 8" DIP 12" PVC 10" DIP 4" Transite 12" DIP 6" Transite 14" DIP aaaaa. Unknown Storage Tank Pump Station Storage Tank ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Figure .9 — South Distribution System Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 2.6.1 South System Storage Tanks The South System currently has two storage tanks totaling 0.8 MG capacity. Storage tanks must be sized to meet domestic demands and fire flow demands per CDPHE. The following assumptions have been made and are consistent with the 2008 Water Supply Master Plan and East Grand County Fire Protection District Code: • Maximum Day Demand (MDD) calculated as 1.5 times the Average Day Demand (ADD) • Fire Flow Demand assumed to be 3,000 gpm for three hours (540,000 gallons) • Operational Volume assumed to be 30% of MDD • Required Storage is a total of these three: MDD, Fire Flow and Operational Volume The required storage was analyzed with the anticipated growth and development. The future development (EQR) in the Town of Fraser is projected in Section 4 below. Future Average Day Demands are calculated based on 275 gpd per EQR and described in Section 4 below. The required storage and storage provided are compared and surplus or deficit in storage volume is listed. Based on these calculations it appears there is currently insufficient capacity in the South System storage tanks. It is anticipated that the Grand Park development will require at least one storage tank to provide domestic demand and fire flow to serve its development. Hydraulic modeling is recommended to confirm sufficient fire flow is available while meeting minimum required pressures of 20 psi at all other points in the pressure zone. See Table 2 for South System Storage Requirements. Table 2 South System Storage Requirements South System Year ADD MDD Fire Flow Operational Volume Required Storage Storage Provided Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons 2022 232,375 348,563 540,000 104,569 993,131 800,000 (193,131) 2023 245,025 367,538 540,000 110,261 1,017,799 800,000 (217,799) 2024 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2025 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2026 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2027 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2028 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2029 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2030 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2031 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2032 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 2..7 Condition and Status of Existing Water Infrastructure Assets Ora Evaluating the existing water system infrastructure and assets was an important task to better understand and analyze the improvements necessary. Using information provided by the Town, an asset inventory database was compiled including assets from six major categories: • Raw Water System (wells and transmission mains) • Water Distribution System and PRVs (transmission mains, distribution mains, vaults, valves and piping) • Master Meters and Shop (potable meters and meter pits) • Pump Stations (structure, electrical, pumps, motors, and ancillary equipment) • Treatment Plants (structure, electrical, pumps, associated treatment) • Storage Tanks (structure and piping) The asset inventory database analyzes the installation year and replacement year given the industry standard useful life for a given asset. A significant amount of Town assets have reached the end of their useful life and should be replaced, per industry standards. The asset inventory shows the capital replacement value for the assets and the total assets for the Town of Fraser water system sum to approximately $116 million. In addition, the asset database calculates the conceptual -level cost associated with replacing an asset including design contingency, general conditions, contractor overhead and profit, and engineering, legal, and administrative costs. If the Town had to replace all of the existing infrastructure today (due to an unlikely catastrophe), the conceptual -level cost would be expected in the range of $200 million. The asset database includes an analysis of the criticality, vulnerability, and risk of each asset. The impacts to public health and safety, effects on operations, impacts to the environment, and cost of repair of each asset are evaluated and create an overall criticality score. The higher the score the more critical the asset and the lower the score the less critical. The vulnerability of the asset, meaning the likelihood of failure, is evaluated as a number between zero and one. Assets assigned a zero indicate new, conversely assets assigned a value of one are expected to fail within less than two years (based on industry standard useful life). Using both the criticality score and the vulnerability the risk of the asset is determined with higher numbers representing higher risk and lower numbers representing lower risk. The asset database is a tool that provides the Town of Fraser an in-depth list of water assets for tracking and future planning purposes. See Appendix B for Asset Database. af,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Indoor Demands Itta Water demand projections were used to estimate how demands may increase over the next 10 years. Projected demand was calculated primarily based on the land use type of development planned for each parcel. Although the original Town area is well developed, there are locations where in -fill development is planned. In addition, there is major development currently underway in the areas of Rendezvous and Grand Park, which include residential, commercial development, open space, and public amenities. Demand estimates were calculated based on the Single -Family Equivalent (SFE) unit for the North System and the Equivalent Residential Units (EQRs) for the South System. An SFE is defined as the amount of water consumed by a typical single-family household on a daily basis. For planning purposes, one SFE for areas served by the North System is defined as 300 gallons per day (gpd). This value has historically been used by the Town of Fraser for planning in the North System and is currently used for demand estimation in Byer's Peak Ranch. Demand estimates for areas served by the South System are based on the Maryvale Plan for Augmentation in Case No. 98CW041 (formerly Case No. 86CW258) which identifies one EQR as 275 gpd. 3.2 Existing Demand Data and Land Use Schedules In terms of development, different building types have different SFE or EQR values assigned. The Town has populated demand information for existing parcels, quantified by the number of SFEs or EQRs depending on whether the parcel is served in the North or South System, respectively. For new development, the values used for various building types for areas served by the North System are based on the Town of Fraser Ordinance No. 436 Part 1 (Exh. A), 2016, and can be generalized as follows. • Single-family residences, mixed -use residential, and commercial structures are assessed a number of SFEs based upon the meter size in accordance with the schedule shown in Table 3. • Multi -family residences are assessed by the Town based on the unit type, as shown in Table 4. Table 3— Single -Family, Mixed -Use Residential, and Commercial SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser) Meter Size Single -Family Residential Mixed -Use Residential / Commercial 5/8" or %" meter 1 SFE 1 SFE 1" meter 1 SFE 2 SFE 1%" meter 4 SFE 4 SFE 2" meter 8 SFE 8 SFE 3" meter 12 SFE 12 SFE 4" meter 24 SFE 24 SFE 6" meter 48 SFE 48 SFE ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report Table 4 ...... Multi -Family Residential SFE. Schedule (Town of Fraser) Multi -Family Residential Unit Type SFEs Individually owned units (e.g. townhomes and condominiums) 1 SFE Multi -family rental units Studio unit 0.25 SFE One- or two -bedroom unit 0.3 SFE Additional bedrooms, additional unit 0.1 SFE Ir� „w w Itta • In addition to the SFE schedules above, the Town of Fraser also specifies 0.35 SFEs for each accessory dwelling unit. The EQR values for various building types in areas served by the South System are based on the Maryvale Decree and are as follows: • 1 Single -Family Residential unit = 1.0 EQR • 1 Multi -Family Residential unit = 0.8 EQR • 1 Hotel/Lodging unit = 0.35 EQR • Commercial or retail/office space = 0.6 EQR per 1,000 ft2. The existing SFE/EQR values were provided by the Town of Fraser, the existing SFE/EQR served by the Town is 1,816 rounded up to 1,820. Next the number of existing SFE/EQR being served by either the North or South System was considered. The North system serves 975 SFE and the South system serves 845 EQR. 3.2.1 Existing Water Demand As part of the water efficiency plan the historical water usage was analyzed. Historical water usage helps define how and where water is used, in what seasons of the year and why, and how water use can be reasonably reduced. Over five years of meter records were analyzed to characterize historical demand in Fraser (October 2016 through June 2022), but the records for 2019, 2020, and 2021 are most complete. Table .5 - Annual Water Delivered and Nonrevenue Water, 20..1.7..2021 Year Annual Delivered Water (millions of gallons, MG) Annual Nonrevenue Water (millions of gallons, MG) Annual Nonrevenue Water (% of annual treated water) 2017 51.6 Not analyzed Not analyzed 2018 57.2 Not analyzed Not analyzed 2019 55.7 12.9 20% 2020 61.9 16.4 21% 2021 55.3 19.1 26% Annual delivered water is the sum of all metered water, which is less than the annual total water treated at the treatment facilities. The difference between these two values is an estimate of the annual ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report nonrevenue water, which is water that was treated but was lost to non -metered purposes. These losses are categorized as: • Unbilled authorized uses (e.g. hydrant use, flushing, construction water use, municipal unmetered irrigation, etc.) • Real losses (leaks in the water distribution system before water reaches service lines) • Apparent losses (unauthorized consumption, data errors, and metering inaccuracies) The Town of Fraser's Water Efficiency Plan (Merrick, 2022) documents existing water demand. The Water Efficiency Plan is considered a sister -document to the 10 -Year Water CIP and is included in Appendix A. Some of the capital improvement projects can be attributed to these losses, including meter testing and replacement, leak detection and prevention, and looping dead ends. 3.2.2 Land Use Schedules One challenge when developing this CIP was the different development areas and development schedules within the Town water system limits. The Town has adopted several guiding plans that can be found on the Town's website. These plans include a series of planning documents, Winter Park long-range plans and studies, Fraser Valley long-range plans and studies, and county wide long-range plans and studies. Between 1986 and 2003, the Town annexed areas now known as Rendezvous and Grand Park. The annexation agreements included agreed -upon planned development with planned land -use types. Water demand and sewer contributions were estimated. As development unfolds, constraining development to the agreed upon projections will benefit the Town as it relates to providing adequate water service to its population. At present, these annexed areas represent the greatest potential impact to the Town because the timeline to buildout is uncertain. An alternative for the Town to monitor the new development is to develop a schedule for these areas that is associated with number of dwelling units or SFEs. This way the Town could determine when the developer or the Town may need to construct additional wells or storage tanks to provide the service to these new developments. It should be noted that the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (recorded in Grand County, CO, 2005-012709) includes approximately 2,400 residential dwelling units is not included in the demand projections because development is expected to exceed 10 -years and time to buildout is not known. Section 4 - Future Projections, includes 72 EQR for known Grand Park development. ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 4 FUTURE PROJECTIONS 4.1 Future Buildout Areas Ora To develop demand projections, future build out areas were coordinated with the Town. The following developments were considered for the South System: • Rendezvous Filing 12 — 20 EQR residential development (2 year build out) • Portion of Grand Park — 72 EQR residential development (2 year build out) The balance of the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (recorded in Grand County, CO, 2005- 012709) that includes approximately 2,400 residential dwelling units is not included in the demand projections because development is expected to exceed the 10-YR Water CIP timeframe and time to buildout is not known. The following developments were considered for the North System: • Byers Peak Ranch Planning Areas 1, 2 & 3 — 343 SFE residential development (2 year build out) • Victoria Village — 70 SFE residential development (3 year build out) • Clayton Court — 32.67 SFE commercial development (10 year build out) • Byers Peak Ranch — 890 SFE master plan residential development (10 year build out) It should be noted that per the Town of Fraser Water & Wastewater Service Agreement in Appendix A the Byers Peak Properties development shall not exceed 1,233 SFEs. For demand projections it is assumed Planning Areas 1, 2 & 3 totaling 343 SFEs will be built in the first two years and the remaining 890 SFEs are spread out over 10 years. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report Itta The future build -out areas were assumed to develop linearly over the build out period for each development. See Table 6 below showing breakdown of the SFE/EQR projections. Table 6 -- Fraser .10 -Year SFE./EQR Projections Year Total SFE/EQR North System SFE South System EQR 2022 1,820 975 845 2023 2,153 1,262 891 2024 2,486 1,549 937 2025 2,602 1,665 937 2026 2,694 1,757 937 2027 2,786 1,849 937 2028 2,879 1,942 937 2029 2,971 2,034 937 2030 3,063 2,126 937 2031 3,155 2,218 937 2032 3,248 2,311 937 As discussed in Section 1, the population projection for 2032 is 1,584 people. Adding future buildout water demand based on the total numbers of SFE/EQR is anticipated to add 1,428 SFE/EQR for a total anticipated SFE/EQR demand of 3,248. It is likely that growth will bring a mix of year-round as well as seasonal residences. The seasonal housing stock could be second homes, AirBnBs, or other vacation rental. For planning purposes, infrastructure must be in place to provide services on demand, based on the SFE/EQR count. 4.2 Demand Projections Using the SFE/EQR projections from Table 6, the Average Day Demand (ADD), Max Day Demand (MDD), Peak Hour Demand (PHD) were calculated. To calculate the average day demand the North system defines 300 gallons per day for each SFE, while the South system defines 275 gallons per day for each EQR. Maximum Day Demand was determined by applying a factor of 1.5 to the Average Day Demand. Peak Hour Demand was determined by applying a factor of 4.0 to the Average Day Demand. Table 7 below shows demand projections for each system. The Well Field Capacity is the amount of water the wells produce and was analyzed to determine when additional wells will likely need to be drilled. For the North System, the 2020 Well Field Capacity in winter was determined to be 659,520 gpd, this information was provided by HRS. For the South System, 2022 Well Field Capacity was determined to be 502,560 gpd, this information was provided by HRS. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report Required Safe Well Yield represents the required amount of water needed from the water wells to safely service the Town and prevent damage to the well systems. To calculate the Required Safe Well Yield for both the North and South systems, a safety factor of 100 gallons per minute (144,000 gpd) was added to the maximum day demand projections for the next ten years, this is consistent with analysis done by HRS. Example of Required Safe Well Yield for 2022 is shown below: Required Safe Well Yield = MDD + 144,000 gpd Year 2022 582,750 gpd = 438,750 gpd + 144,000 gpd The remaining well field capacity was then calculated, with negative numbers showing insufficient water is available. Based on these calculations it appears that the North and South System will require an additional well to be drilled in 2023 to provide sufficient volume. However, in December 2022 it was determined that approximately 184 SFE/EQR currently served by the North System must be shifted to the South System. The number of SFE/EQRs to be shifted may increase pending additional calculation by the Town. Shifting these SFE/EQR would provide some relief to the North System and potentially delay the timing of the need for the new well and expedite the need for a well in the South System. Table 8 summarizes well field capacities. The balance of the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (recorded in Grand County, CO, 2005- 012709) that includes approximately 2,400 residential dwelling units is not included in the well field analysis because development is expected to exceed the 10-YR Water CIP timeframe and time to buildout is not known. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report Table 7- Fraser 10 -Year Demand Projections North System S outh System Year ADD gpd MDD gpd PHD gpd ADD gpd MDD gpd PHD gpd 2022 292,500 438,750 1,170,000 232,375 348,563 929,500 2023 378,630 567,945 1,514,520 245,025 367,538 980,100 2024 464,760 697,140 1,859,041 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2025 499,440 749,160 1,997,761 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2026 527,120 790,681 2,108,482 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2027 554,801 832,201 2,219,202 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2028 582,481 873,721 2,329,922 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2029 610,161 915,241 2,440,643 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2030 637,841 956,761 2,551,363 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2031 665,521 998,281 2,662,084 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2032 693,201 1,039,802 2,772,804 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 Dm ID -ID MERRICK` ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Table 8 - Fraser Well Field Capacity N orth System South System 20 Well Field Capacity Required Safe Well Yield Remaining Capacity 2022 Well Field Capacity Required Safe Well Yield Remaining Capacity Year (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) 2022 659,520 582,750 76,770 502,560 492,563 9,998 2023 659,520 711,945 (52,425) 502,560 511,538 (8,978) 2024 659,520 841,140 (181,620) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2025 659,520 893,160 (233,640) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2026 659,520 934,681 (275,161) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2027 659,520 976,201 (316,681) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2028 659,520 1,017,721 (358,201) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2029 659,520 1,059,241 (399,721) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2030 659,520 1,100,761 (441,241) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2031 659,520 1,142,281 (482,761) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2032 659,520 1,183,802 (524,282) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 25 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN When developing the list of recommended projects for the 10 -year Water CIP, several resources were consulted including the following: • Town of Fraser Water Supply Master Plan (Brown and Caldwell, 2008) • Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) • Town of Fraser Water Distribution System Master Plan (Bowman, 2020) • Fraser Firming Project Study (JRS, 2015) • Summary of Capital Improvements Projects for 2023 Budget Cycle Technical Memorandum (Merrick, 2022) • Water Efficiency Plan (Merrick, 2022) • HRS page (2022) Each of the documents recommended CIPs. Working with the Town, those CIPs that were not implemented and remained relevant were carried forward to this 10 -Year Water CIP report. Discussions with Town Staff revealed potential CIPs needed to address issues not included in the documents above. Recommended CIP projects were broken down into three categories: supply, distribution system and policy. • Supply CIPs include improvements related to raw water supply, wells, augmentation, and other raw water infrastructure. • Distribution System CIPs include improvements to existing infrastructure such as storage tanks, waterlines, PRVs, meters, and potable water infrastructure. • Policy items represent recommended studies, revisions to Town code, and other administrative efforts that may involve capital expenditures and support of Town Leadership. Recommended CIPs are presented in Table 9 on the following page. The source of item is shown; 2008 corresponds with projects mentioned previously in the 2008 report by Brown and Caldwell, TM corresponds with projects from the technical memo prepared by Merrick, 2015 corresponds with the Fraser Firming Project Study, and WEP represents projects from the Water Efficiency Plan. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Table 9 - Capital Improvement Projects Supply Itta Source of Item Capital Improvement Project 2008 Planning and preliminary engineering for developing St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension Water rights for non -potable supply. 2015 Surface Water Treatment Plant — St. Louis Creek (2026 Water Quality Testing, Environmental Investigations, 2027 Land Acquisition, 2031 Construction) 2008 Siting and design of additional water supply well for Fraser System well field. 2008 Drilling, construction and testing of additional water supply well. 2008 Site selection, planning, and preliminary engineering design for Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) 2008 Phase I - Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) 2008 Phase II - Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) 2008 Planning and preliminary engineering to fully augment the Fraser System Well field by developing required upstream storage for exchange and augmentation. Distribution System Source of Item Capital Improvement Project 2008 Replace distribution pipeline in southeast corner (Elk Creek Drive to Old Victory Road) of Town to meet fire flow requirements. 2008 Additional 500,000 gallon Blue Zone Storage Tank to meet maximum day plus fire flow demand. 2008 Planning and preliminary engineering design required to determine the quantity of additional treated water storage required for potential Blue Zone Tank expansion. 2008 Replacement distribution system loop between Eisenhower, HWY 40, and Fraser Avenue. Town North -South System Connection - Conceptual Design Phase for issue with water rights/augmentation. TM Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements TM Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters (Wolverine, Badger, Ermine, Ferret) TM Waterline Improvements for Quail Drive TM North -South System Exchange Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave (850 LF x $2,350 / LF) Waterline Improvements for Eisenhower Dr (600 LF x $2,350 / LF) Waterline Improvements for Fraser Ave (550 LF x $2,350 / LF) Waterline Improvements for Eastom Ave (465 LF x $2,350 / LF) Install New North Water Treatment Plant Booster Pump Replace Transite Pipe that serves out-of-town homes in Byers Peak Ranch Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Piping (50 LF 2" Steel) Red Zone Pump Station Updates (Pumps, Pressure Gauges, PLC, SCADA, and Antennas) WEP Meter Testing and Replacement (assume 100 replaced per year $450 per meter) WEP Leak Prevention and Replacement (assume $100,000 per year for 10 years) WEP Looping Dead Ends (assume $250,000 per year for years 2026-2029) Water System Model Updates Water Efficiency Plan ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report 31 Policy Source of Item Capital Improvement Project WEP Rate Study (Assume 2023 and 2028) Using the asset database and this list of capital improvement projects an unconstrained model was built. The unconstrained model is developed if the Town had unlimited funds to construct all the CIPs and replace any assets that are past their useful life. See Figure 10 below of unconstrained model. The total cost for 2023 for the unconstrained model is over $30 million. One thing to note is that there is some overlap between the CIPs and the asset database, some of the projects in the CIP list address issues or replace assets in the asset database, for the unconstrained model what this means is that there could be double counting for example the water meters. We know that this is unrealistic and leads us to the constrained model. With guidance from the Town about priorities and yearly budgets we can create a more realistic model. The constrained model aims for a yearly budget of less than $2 million. Naturally by constraining the budget different projects are pushed out into the future. See Figure 11 below of constrained model. Both unconstrained and constrained models are included in Appendix B. ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water C!P Report y Dm ID MERRICK` ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Figure 18 - Unconstrained Model 29 Town of Fraser 1O -Year Water CIP Report ■ ® ■ _ , __Z .. _ ■=2 . ~,_,_z__, tee S tS ,SSQ ,SSI, ti _WAS OX Dm MERRICK mo t Numbe 65421166 Figure 11 -Constra ined Model 30 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 5..1 2023 CIP The following projects have been identified for completion in 2023: • Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements ($1.72M) — this project will replace aging waterline in Byers Avenue to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. • Rate Study ($90,000) — rate study will advise the Town on potential changes to rate structure. Identified by the Water Efficiency Plan. • Water System Model Updates ($51,300) — proposed engineering effort to update the Town water hydraulic model. Updates to the hydraulic model will better inform the Town regarding future CIPs and expose any constraints to the system. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. 5.2 2024 CIP The following projects have been identified for completion in 2024: • Siting and Design of Additional Water Supply Well for Fraser System Well Field ($22,000) — location determination, planning, engineering for additional water well. This project was identified by the 2008 Master Plan and the calculations with the 10 -year CIP support the need for the additional well. • Drilling, Construction, and Testing of Additional Water Supply Well (placeholder cost $250,000) — After the planning and engineering phase this project consists of the construction and installation of the 100 feet deep alluvium well. This project was identified by the 2008 Master Plan and the calculations with the 10 -year CIP support the need for the additional well. Assume the well will be brought on-line in 2026. • Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters ($1.06M) — this project consists of waterline improvements to Badger Lane, Wolverine Lane, Ermine Lane, and Ferret Lane in the Blue Zone on the east side of the Town. Each of these roads have a dead-end water line and this project would provide looping, increase reliability, and improve water quality. • North -South System Connection Conceptual Design Phase ($40,000) — this project consists of planning and engineering for the improvement required to shift the water supply from the North System to the South System for the 184 existing homes in Grand Park. • Planning and engineering for Blue Zone Tank Expansion ($47,000) — this project consists of determining the location and engineering for new Blue Zone Tank. Increase in demand driven by the development in Byers Peak is the leading factor for the need for the expansion or additional tank. • Install New North Water Treatment Plant Booster Pump ($61,000) — asset database shows the pump for the treatment plant is at the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced. This project would propose to buy a new pump and keep the others in service until failure. ❑❑f,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report Ora • Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Piping ($184,000) — Town staff has identified concerns with the Red Zone Pump Station infrastructure and this project would replace the pressure reducing valves and 50 linear feet of pipe 2" pipe. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and pipe replacement as needed. 2025 CIP The following projects have been identified for completion in year 2025: • North -South System Exchange ($330,000) — this project consists of the improvements required to shift the water supply from the North System to the South System for the 184 existing homes in Grand Park. • Waterline Improvements for Quail Drive ($198,000) — this project will improve looping of waterlines in Quail Drive to improve water quality, increase reliability and decrease risk of freezing. • Waterline Improvements Elk Creek Drive to Old Victory Road ($628,000) — this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan and will improve reliability and meet fire flow requirements. Updates to the hydraulic modeling will better inform the improvements that are required. • Site Selection, Planning, and Preliminary Engineering for Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir ($234,000) — this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan. This project proposes an augmentation reservoir from Elk Creek and is a beneficial use of the Town's water rights. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. 5.4 2026 CIP • 500,000 -gallon Blue Zone Storage Tank ($1.1M) — this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan to meet maximum day plus fire flow requirements. The calculations with the 10 -year CIP support the need for the additional Blue Zone Storage Tank. The increase in demand from the Byers Peak development is the leading factor for the need of the additional tank. • Planning and Engineering for St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension ($234,000) — this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan to expand the water rights to a non -potable supply. This project is a beneficial use of the Town's water rights and coincides with the Surface Water Treatment Plant project. • Surface Water Treatment Plant ($200,000) — the surface water treatment plant was identified in the 2015 Firming Study as a beneficial use of the Town's water rights. This project coincides with af,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report Ora the St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension. This project consists of $100,000 for water quality testing and $100,000 for environmental investigations. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. • Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10 -year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 2027 CIP • Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave ($2M) - this project will replace aging waterline in Mill Avenue to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. • Surface Water Treatment Plant — St. Louis Creek ($1.7M) — the surface water treatment plant was identified in the 2015 Firming Study as a beneficial use of the Town's water rights. This project cost is for land acquisition of the treatment plant. A four -acre site was assumed with an assumed price of $9 per square foot. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. • Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10 -year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. .6 2628 CIP • Phase I — Possible Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir ($1.1M) — this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan as a beneficial use of the Town's water rights. Project proposes an augmentation reservoir from Elk Creek. • Water Efficiency Plan ($45,000) — this project would be an update to the Water Efficiency Plan to build on the effort completed in 2023. It is typical to update the Water Efficiency Plan every five years. • Rate Study ($90,000) — rate study will advise the Town on potential changes to rate structure. Identified by the Water Efficiency Plan. It is typical to study and possibly update rates every five years. af,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. • Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10 -year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 577 2029 CIP • Waterline Improvements for Eisenhower Drive ($1.4M) - this project will replace aging waterline in Eisenhower Drive to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. • Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10 -year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 2030 CIP • Red Zone Pump Station Updates ($317,000) — some of the infrastructure for the Red Zone Pump Station including: pumps, pressure gauges, PLC, SCADA, and antennas are aging and due to be replaced. This project was identified by the Town staff as a concern to be addressed. • Replacement Distribution Loop ($190,000) — this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan. The project proposed a replacement distribution loop between Eisenhower, Hwy 40 and Fraser Avenue. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 10 -Year Water CIP Report 5..9 2031.. CIP Ora • Surface Water Treatment Plant — St. Louis Creek ($5.7M) — the surface water treatment plant was identified in the 2015 Firming Study as a beneficial use of the Town's water rights. This project cost is for construction of the treatment plant. • Transite Pipe ($3.3M) — this project was identified by the Town as a concern. This project proposed to replace 4,500 linear feet of transite pipe that serves out-of-town homes in Byers Peak Ranch • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. 5,10 2032 CIP • Waterline Improvements for Fraser Avenue ($1.3M) - this project will replace aging waterline in Fraser Avenue to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. • Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) —The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. • Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) — The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10 -year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. • Planning and Engineering for Fraser System Augmentation ($234,000) — this project was identified by the 2008 Master Plan. The project consists of planning, location determination, engineering, for the Fraser System Well field to be fully augmented by developing the required upstream storage for exchange and augmentation. If the recent projects for the St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension/Surface Water Treatment Plant and Forest Meadows Augmentation Project meet the requirements this planning and engineering project is unnecessary. af,o MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1Q -Year Water CIP Report REFERENCES Associates, M. &. (October 2, 2002). Water and Sewer Master Plan Rendevous Development. Off Brown and Caldwell. (January 18, 2008). Water Supply Master Plan. Town of Fraser. HRS Water Consultants, Inc. (2020). Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report. Town of Fraser. HRS Water Consultants, Inc. (August 12, 2022). Fraser Water Rights Summary. JRS Engineer Consultant, L. &. (2015). Fraser Firming Project Study. Fraser: Town of Fraser. Town of Fraser. (2021). Design Criteria and Construction Standards. ❑❑f,0 MERRICK' ❑❑❑ Project Number 65421166 Town of Fraser 1O -Year CIP Report Itita APPENDIX A DDD ERRICK® R°R MERRICK® coo MEMORANDUM August 4, 2022 TO: Ed Cannon, Town Manager, Town of Fraser FROM: Julie Koehler, PE, Merrick and Company RE: SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS FOR 2023 BUDGET CYCLE INTRODUCTION Town of Fraser requested Merrick's assistance with budget planning for 2023. The focus is on projects that were scheduled for, but not completed in 2022 and one project identified in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (Merrick, June 2022). Section 1 of this memo is organized by project name, the budget request for 2023, the budget request for 2024 if needed, and a brief description of the project. The project titles include the following: • West Old -Town Sewer Capacity Improvements to Address I&I • Fraser River Trail pavement replacement • Update and Breakout the 2021 Water System Improvements projects o Improvements to Badger Lane, Wolverine Lane, Ermine Lane, Ferret Lane (Furry Critters) o Improvements to Quail Drive o Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults o Re -design of Byers Ave Waterline Replacement o Re -design of Lions Pond Restroom Improvements (by others) • Sewer Main Replacement (Leonard Ln to Doc Susie) — Currently in design development with opinion of cost to be provided with the 60% drawings under separate cover. Section 2 provides a detailed Opinion of Total Anticipated Project Cost (OTAPC) for each project. SECTION 1 - PROJECTS The West Old -Town Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. 2023 Requested Funds $88,000 2024 Requested Funds $1,120,000 The Town of Fraser Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (Merrick, 2022) recommends the West Old - Town Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. The project will upsize and replace approximately 840 feet of 10 - inch sewer pipe and 480 feet of 12 -inch sewer pipe. The goals of the project are to decrease the amount of Infiltration and Inflow (I&I) and replace aged sewer pipe that is at the end of its useful life. Upsizing the pipelines will increase capacity in the pipes to allow new development to connect to the sewer collection system. Employee Owned II I I (I II ,1r� III II� � ����,, ilJJl��ia//i//liaill��������illl����iill�������������, hello@merrick.com www.merrick.com The OTAPC for the West Old -Town Sewer Capacity Improvements project is $1,220,000 including $88,000 in engineering design fees. Fraser River Trail Pavement Replacement Project. 2023 Requested Funds $410,000 The existing asphalt surface of the Fraser River Trail is in need of replacement. The recommended method for replacement is a non-traditional 1 -inch mill (typical mill depth is 2" which is not suitable given existing asphalt depth) followed by a 2 -inch overlay. This system is expected to last 10 to 15 years. The OTAPC is $410,000 including $34,000 in engineering fees. Update and Breakout the 2021 Water System Improvements Projects. 2023 Requested Funds: Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters $1,060,000 Waterline Improvements to Quail Drive $198,000 Pressure Reducing Valve Vault Improvements $330,000 Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements $1,720,000 Waterline improvements will improve reliability, decrease chance of freezing, and improve looping of waterlines to decrease dead end waterlines in the neighborhoods. Improvements to pressure reducing valves and vaults will improve pressure regulation between pressure zones. Anticipated project costs were broken out by components and includes the three following items: • Improvements to Badger Lane, Wolverine Lane, Ermine Lane, Ferret Lane (Furry Critters) • Improvements to Quail Drive • Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults The OTAPC for the entire project is $3,310,000. SECTION 2 - DETAILED OPINION OF TOTAL ANTICIPATED PROJECT COST Detailed Opinions of Total Anticipated Project Costs (OTAPC) have been developed for the projects identified in Section 1. The OTAPCs are based on high-level concepts; existing documentation and design criteria; and conceptual levels of detail. Recent projects bid and constructed in the Front Range and on the Western Slope as well as manufacturer's representatives and installers budgetary quotations were referenced with development of the OTAPC. Actual project costs will depend on actual market conditions at the time of project implementation. The volatility over the past few years underscores the impact of changing labor and material costs, actual site conditions, productivity, competitive market conditions, final project scope and schedule, and other variables. The OTAPC is based on the categories defined by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) as shown in Table 1. 2 Table 1. AACE Categories Type of Cost Estimating Anticipated Accuracy Class 5 (Conceptual) +100% to -50% Class 4 (Planning Level) +50% to -30% Class 3 (Preliminary Design) +30% to -15% Class 2 (50% to 70% Design) +20% to -10% Class 1 (Pre -Bid) +15% to -5% The OTAPC for the West Old -Town Sewer Capacity Improvements project is considered a Class 5 opinion. The OTAPC for the Fraser River Trail Pavement Replacement project is considered a Class 3 opinion. The OTAPC for the Update and Breakout of the 2021 Water System Improvements Projects is considered a Class 1 opinion. 3 Fraser Water Rights Summary By: HRS, 8/12/2022 The Town of Fraser's North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the "Fraser Wells") with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. The total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed a pumping rate of 2.28 cfs. Pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town, and are "exchange to" structures for the Town's decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out -of - priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. The Town of Fraser's South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed, and currently includes four active wells (Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 7) with 1999 appropriation dates. These wells supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. The wells are included in the Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation ("Maryvale Augmentation Plan") which was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties (up to 2,822 equivalent residential units ("EQRs") and irrigate 17 acres). The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the Cozens Ditch water right, which was changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage from the Maryvale Reservoir or Grand Park Ponds. The Town also owns surface water rights on the St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension Ditch and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. These ditches that are decreed for irrigation purposes. Additionally, the Town owns reservoir water storage capacity for replacement and exchange purposes in reservoirs located at Fraser, i.e. Grand County Water and Sanitation District Reservoir No. 2 and at other downstream reservoirs. Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report June 2020 Prepared by Town of Fraser Staff, Chris Thorne Matt Tieslau Greenberg Traurig, LLP & Mark Palumbo Steve Barrett HRS Water Consultants, Inc. Glossary of Terms • Ac = Acre = 1 Ac = 43,560 Square Feet • Af = Acre -Feet = 1 Af = 325,851 gallons • Avg = Arithmetic Average • Af/Ac/Yr = Acre -Feet per Acre per Year • Af/EQR = Acre -Feet per Equivalent Residential Unit • Af/Yr = Acre -Feet per Year • CFS = Cubic Feet Per Second = 1 cfs = 448.8 GPM and 1 CFS/day = 1.9835 acre- feet • EQR = Equivalent Residential Unit - 1 EQR is typically considered to equate to full- time occupancy for an average of 2.75 people. EQRs are reduced for multi -family and commercial units. 1 EQR has a water demand of 275 gallons/day. • Ft = Feet • Gal = Gallon of Water • GPM = Gallons Per Minute • GPM/EQR = Gallons Per Minute/Equivalent Residential Unit • Hp = Horse Power • Q = Well Pumping Discharge Rate • WTP = Water Treatment Plant • WY = Water Year (November 1 — October 31) i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems A. Legal Water Supplies for the North Fraser System i. Town of Fraser's Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4 and 5 (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 ii. Surface Water Rights (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts (a) Twenty -Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir (c) Windy Gap Project Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir (2) Clinton Reservoir -Fraser River Water Agreement (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement iv. Storage — Fraser Reservoir No. 2 v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation B. Legal Water Supplies for the South System i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan ii. Wells (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 iii. Surface Water Rights (1) Cozens Ditch (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension ii. Reservoir/Pond Storage ii (1) Mary's Pond (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights B. Other Water Rights i. Decreed Exchanges (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange (2) Middle Park Exchange II. Physical Water Supply Demand for the North System A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs iii. Monthly Demand iv. Max Day Demands B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs iii. Monthly Demand iii. Max Day Demands C. Current Water Supply for the North System i. Fraser Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Sage Yield ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data D. Current Water Supply for the South System i. Maryvale Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQRs for the North System ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands iii. Max Day Demands F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the South System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands CONCLUSION iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: North System Wells page 3 Table 2: South System Wells pages 8-9 Table 3: Current North System Demands Appendix Table 4: Current South System Demands Appendix Table 5: Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates pages 13-14 Table 6: North System Wellfield - Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Information Appendix Table 7: Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates page 15 Table 8: South System Wellfield — Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Details Appendix Table 9: North System — Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 10: North System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix Table 11: South System — Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 12: South System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix iv INTRODUCTION This 2020 Update to the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan ("Updated Water Plan") is primarily intended to provide a "picture in time" of the current legal and physical water supplies available to the Town of Fraser (the "Town"), in its role as a municipal water supplier. It is hoped and intended that the Updated Water Plan will be useful to the Town Board in decision - making and policy determinations regarding water supply issues, and as a resource to evaluate future potential growth and development; to the Town Staff, as a reference source for planning efforts, which identifies both the current limitations and future growth potential of the municipal water system; and to current and future, potential residents and business owners in the Town, who may be interested in a better understanding of the Town's water supplies. The Updated Water Plan relies heavily upon, and is generally intended as an update to, prior water supply planning efforts undertaken by the Town, including efforts in 2007 (resulting in a draft "Water Supply Master Plan" report, primarily prepared by Brown & Caldwell), and in 2015 (resulting in the draft "Fraser Firming Project Study" report prepared by HRS Water Consultants, Inc. ("HRS") and JRS Engineering Consultant, LLC), and less formal efforts by the Town Staff and its water team over the years. Preparation of the Updated Water Plan was a collaborative effort involving input from the Fraser Town Board of Trustees; the Fraser Town Staff; HRS; and the Town's water rights counsel. The Town's municipal water supply facilities include two independent, but physically connected, systems: (1) the "North System", which generally supplies geographic areas of the Town known as "Old Town Fraser", and the Byers Peak Properties development; and (2) the "South System" which supplies geographic areas of the Town encompassing the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments. This report is divided into two sections. The first section is a general description of the current legal water supplies for both the North and South Systems. The second section discusses the current and projected future water supply demands, and physical supplies for both the North and South Systems. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems A. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE NORTH SYSTEM i. Town of Fraser's Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply) The North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the "Fraser Wells") with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. (See Table 1, North System Wells). As described in more detail below, pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town, and are "exchange to" structures for the Town's decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out -of -priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. 1 (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System The original legal source for Fraser's "domestic water system" was decreed absolute in Civil Action 1175 for 2.28 cfs with an appropriation date of September 12, 1954 and an adjudication date of January 14, 1957 (the "Fraser Domestic Water Supply System"). The Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right is decreed for domestic and municipal purposes, including irrigation and fire protection. In Civil Action W-2279, the original point of diversion on St. Louis Creek for this water right, was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. Later, in Case Nos. 82CW219 and 85CW339, the Town's alluvial wells were decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right. This water right was in use for municipal and domestic use prior to October 1977 and, therefore, is covered by augmentation or replacement releases from the Historic Users Pool, or "HUP", in Green Mountain Reservoir. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of July 22, 1982 and an adjudication date of July 5, 1985. Well Nos. 1-5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. These wells were also decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Town's Domestic Water System. Under the decree in Case No. 82CW219, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, when the wells are being pumped as alternate points of diversion. This is an important limitation on the legal water supply available to the North System. Additionally, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed the amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System at its decreed point of diversion. Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 are covered by the plan for augmentation approved in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987 (the "Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan"), as described in more detail in Section I.A.v., below. (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of February 28, 1985 and an adjudication date of November 8, 1988. Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. Like Fraser Well Nos. 1-5, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were designated as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water System. Again, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, and the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed that amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System water right at its decreed point of diversion, less any stream losses, from the point of diversion to the well locations. 2 Table 1: North System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Date Adjud. Date Amou nt (cfs) Amount Absolute (cfs) Amount Cond. (cfs) Permit No. Fraser Well No. 1 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.285 0.049 32203-F Fraser Well No. 2 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.31 0.136 32204-F Fraser Well No. 3A (inactive) 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.223 0.089 0.134 32205-F Fraser Well No. 3B 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.156 0.178 32206-F Fraser Well No. 4 (ground water mon. well) 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.0 0.446 32207-F Fraser Well No. 5 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.301 0.145 66896-F Fraser Well No. 7 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.17 0.16 34809-F Fraser Well No. 8 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.0 0.33. 34810-F Fraser Well No. 9 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.44 0.44 0.0 34811-F ii. Surface Water Rights (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension The St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension was decreed for irrigation purposes in Civil Action 183 with an appropriation date of June 1, 1904 and an adjudication date of August 3, 1911. The Town owns 1.0 cfs, absolute, to divert from St. Louis Creek. The water right was originally decreed for irrigation. In case number W-2280, this water right was changed from its original use to the following new uses: domestic, fire and sanitary, garden and lawn 3 irrigation, and other household uses. Additionally, the point of diversion was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. The St. Louis Creek water right is not currently connected to the Town's municipal water supply system; however, the Town continues to evaluate the possibilities for physically incorporating the water available under these senior water rights into its daily water supplies (see, for example, the "Fraser Firming Study Project" report, referenced above), and anticipates and intends such use in the near future. (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 The Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 surface water right was decreed in Civil Action 407 on August 11, 1906 for 2.0 cfs, absolute, to divert out of Elk Creek for irrigation. Pursuant to the terms of the Water Court decree approving the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to "storage use for subsequent augmentation release." Fraser intends to utilize the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right in the future for the decreed augmentation use, and is currently evaluating various water storage options. iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts The Town has four water allotment contracts for Windy Gap Project water with the Middle Park Water Conservancy District ("MPWCD"). Two water allotment contracts are for water stored in Granby Reservoir, and two are "Windy Gap Standby Contracts" for water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir. Through all four contracts, the Town currently has leased 157.75 af of Windy Gap Project water. Sixty-five af of that amount currently is subject to a lease to the developer of the Grand Park property. The specific contracts are described in the following subsections. (a) Twenty -Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir Pursuant to a July 11, 1985 water allotment contract with MPWCD Fraser is entitled to 25 af of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir, which is located on the Colorado River upstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. This water allotment contract is perpetual. An exchange of this water from the confluence of the Fraser and Colorado Rivers to the Fraser Wells was decreed in Case No. 85CW337, Water Division 5. This 25 af may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water, pursuant to various agreements among the Town, other Grand County water suppliers, and Denver Water, pursuant to which Denver Water bypasses water available for diversion through its Moffatt Collection System. (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir Fraser is entitled to 80 af of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir pursuant to an August 1, 1989 water allotment contract with MPWCD. This water allotment contract is perpetual. Under a July 10, 1989 Lease Agreement, 65 af of the 80 af has been leased for potential irrigation of a golf course planned, at one time, for the Grand Park development. This 80 af of water is also the subject of a decreed exchange. Pursuant to the decree in Case No. 90CW235, Water Division No. 5, this water can be exchanged to various 4 locations in the Fraser System and Maryvale System. The 15 af not being leased, may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (c) Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir Additionally, Fraser is entitled to 52.75 af of Windy Gap Project Standby water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir pursuant to two water allotment contracts entered in 2003 and 2004 ("Standby Water"). The Wolford Mountain Reservoir is located on Muddy Creek, which is tributary to the Colorado River downstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. These two contracts are perpetual and presumably valid if the Town maintains its other MPWCD Windy Gap Contracts. The Standby Water may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (2) Clinton Reservoir -Fraser River Water Agreement Fraser is a party to the Clinton -Reservoir -Fraser River Agreement ("Clinton Reservoir Agreement"), which was signed on July 21, 1992 and amended on October 26, 2016. Pursuant to the Agreement, Denver Water agreed to annually bypass at its intakes and make available from other components of Denver Water's delivery system, as necessary, 846 af of water to be used under the provisions of the Clinton Agreement and Grand County Water Users' Operating Plan ("Bypass Water"). The Town is entitled to 104.5 af of the Bypass Water. By decree in Case No. 92CW305, entered on November 19, 1996, Grand County Water & Sanitation District No. 1, Winter Park Water & Sanitation District, the Town of Granby, and the Town of Fraser ("Co -Applicants") sought and were awarded a conditional water right and approval of a plan for augmentation, including substitution and exchange to implement the provisions of the Clinton Agreement. Pursuant to the original decree and subsequent diligence decrees, water will be diverted under a 1992 priority at Denver's existing points of diversion and collection system and will be released from Denver's collection system on the Fraser River, St. Louis Creek, Little Vasquez Creek, and Vasquez Creek into those streams and used by each of the Co -Applicants at locations decreed to each of those entities under their existing water rights. Pursuant to the decree, the Bypass Water can be used for irrigation, domestic, and all municipal uses between September 15 and May 15 each year, but it is not decreed for storage. The seasonal limitation on the use of Bypass Water was eliminated in connection with the CRCA agreements described immediately below. (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement On September 23, 2010, Denver Water and seventeen entities from the West Slope executed the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement ("CRCA"), which resolves various longstanding disputes involving Denver Water's operations on the West Slope. The CRCA took effect on September 26, 2013. Pursuant to the CRCA and the 2012 Grand County Water Users Operating Plan ("GCWUOP"), Denver Water agreed to make 375 af of water available annually to the Grand County signatories ("Additional Bypass Water"), "upon issuance and acceptance by Denver Water of permits necessary for [Denver Water's] Moffat Project." Pursuant to the GCWUOP and the related "Implementation Agreement" between Denver Water and the Town, executed on October 9, 2013, the Town is conditionally entitled to 68.75 af of the Additional Bypass Water. 5 Pursuant to the decree entered on March 15, 2016 in Case No. 11CW152, the Additional Bypass Water may be used for municipal, snowmaking, domestic, commercial, irrigation, recreation, fish and wildlife, and fire protection uses. The Additional Bypass Water may be delivered for diversion to Fraser at the following locations: Gaskill Ditch; Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5; and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. Prior to diverting the Additional Bypass Water through its wells, pursuant to the decree in Case No. 11 CW152, Fraser will need to apply for and obtain new well permits to allow for diversion of deliveries of the Additional Bypass Water. iv. Storage — Reservoir No. 2 In Case No. 02CW367, on February 28, 2005, the Grand County Water & Sanitation District ("GCWSD") decreed GCWSD Reservoir No. 2 ("Reservoir No. 2") for municipal, irrigation, augmentation, piscatorial, aesthetic, and recreation uses with the right to fill and refill in priority to replace water applied to decreed uses and to replace evaporative losses. The Reservoir No. 2 water right was originally decreed for 80 af, conditional. This reservoir is an off - channel, lined reservoir located southwest of the Fraser River between the Maryvale Wells and the Fraser Wells. On July 31, 2018, the Town acquired from GCWSD No. 1, via deed, 25 af of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and 25 af of the storage capacity in the reservoir. GCWSD No. 1 also conveyed 25 af of the water right and 25 af of the storage capacity to Winter Park Water & Sanitation District ("WPWSD"). In Case No. 18CW3070, 70 af of this water right was decreed absolute for all decreed purposes with 10 af remaining conditional. GCWSD No. 1 owns the remaining 20 af of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and storage capacity. WPWSD, GCWSD, and Fraser executed an operating agreement for Reservoir No. 2 on July 30, 2018. v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation As described above, the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan was decreed in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987. Pursuant to the approved augmentation plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to "storage use for subsequent augmentation release." Additionally, the plan is approved to provide replacement for out -of -priority depletions caused by the pumping of Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 for domestic, commercial, municipal, and irrigation uses. Fraser continues to investigate options for the construction of an augmentation pond to enable operation of the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Case No. 83CW362, a decreed storage pond for the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water, is required to implement the augmentation plan. B. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE SOUTH SYSTEM The following sections describe the legal water supplies for the South System: i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan The Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation ("Maryvale Augmentation Plan") was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties. 6 Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement between Fraser and Rendezvous Colorado, LLC ("Amended Annexation Agreement"), dated June 23, 2000, the Maryvale Augmentation Plan was conveyed, in large part, to the Town via Bargain and Sale Deed, dated June 23, 2000, and corrected on October 17, 2011 (the "Deed"). Among other rights, the Deed conveyed to Fraser 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right; 20 af of the "Mary's Pond" storage water right; 32.7 af of storage in augmentation/detention ponds located on Grand Park (the "Detention Reservoirs"); and "all of the benefits and burdens" of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The Maryvale Augmentation Plan provides for augmentation of 16 large capacity wells (1,600 gpm total) and 91 small capacity wells (maximum pumping rate of 15 gpm) to serve 2,822 equivalent residential units ("EQRs") and irrigate 17 acres. The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the 3.125 cfs Cozens Ditch water right, which was historically used for the irrigation of 125 acres, and changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage. Prior to full build out of the development, the decree contemplates enlargement of the existing Maryvale Reservoir and the construction of up to six of the Detention Reservoirs to store excess historical consumptive use credit water and winter return flows. The 32.7 af of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for full operation of the Augmentation Plan was conveyed to Fraser by the Deed. ii. Wells The South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed , and currently includes four active wells, which supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. See Table 2 ("South System Wells"). These four wells were constructed in the Troublesome Formation, which is considered tributary to the Fraser River. Out -of -priority stream depletions from these wells are fully covered by operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 99CW313, the Court adjudicated three of the 16 proposed large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. These wells are known as Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The maximum cumulative diversions from the Maryvale Well water rights plus the Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 00CW294, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each individual Maryvale Well is 0.5 cfs (225 gpm). Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 are decreed for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, municipal, stockwatering, and fire protection uses. Pursuant to the Deed, 0.78 cfs cumulative of the Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 water rights was conveyed to Fraser for use in Fraser's municipal water supply system. Maryvale Well No. 1 was decreed absolute for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes in Case No. 08CW192. The remaining conditional amount is 0.31 cfs (139 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes and 0.5 cfs (225 gpm) for industrial, municipal, stock watering, and fire protection purposes. 7 The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make an additional portion of the Maryvale Well No. 1 water right absolute for municipal purposes in the amount of 0.20 cfs That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3020, is pending. (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 00CW294, the Court adjudicated 13 of the 16 large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan in three well fields ("Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1, 2, and 3"). As mentioned above, the maximum cumulative diversions from the Rendezvous Well Field water rights plus the Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 99CW313, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each well within the Rendezvous Well Fields is up to 0.56 cfs (250 gpm). In Case. No. 08CW191, three wells were utilized to make a total of 0.57 cfs (255 gpm) of the Rendezvous Well Field No. 3 water right absolute for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purpose as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.99 cfs (40 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.29 cfs (130 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm). The total amount made absolute to date between all groundwater rights decreed in Case Nos. 99CW313 and 00CW294 is 0.76 cfs (341 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes with a total volume of 96.33 af. The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make additional portions of Maryvale Well Nos. 4, 5, and 7 absolute for municipal use for a total of 0.60 cfs (270 gpm) as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.11 cfs (47.3 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.30 cfs (135.7 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (86.5 gpm). That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3034, is pending. Table 2: South System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Date Adjud. Date Tot. Amt. (cfs) Amt. Abs. (cfs) Amt. Cond. (cfs) Permit No. Maryvale Well No. 1 99CW313 11/17/1999 12/31/2002 0.5 0.18 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.31 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.5 (other uses) 82996-F Maryvale Well No. 2 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 Maryvale Well No. 3 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 8 Maryvale Well No. 4 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.09 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.47 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83256-F Maryvale Well No. 5 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.29 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.27 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83257-F Maryvale Well No. 7 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.19 (dom., irrig., comm.) .37 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83258-F iii. Surface Water Rights (1) Cozens Ditch The Cozens Ditch water right was decreed on August 1, 1906 in Civil Action No. 112, Grand County District Court in the amount of 3.125 cfs from Vasquez Creek for irrigation. Historically, the Cozens Ditch Water Right was diverted from May through August for the irrigation of approximately 125 acres. As mentioned above, the Cozens Ditch water right was changed in Case No. 98CW41 to be used for augmentation purposes under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By the Deed, 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right was conveyed to the Town. (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension In Case No. 99CW314, on December 31, 2002, the Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were adjudicated in the amounts of 3.1 cfs and 1.5 cfs, respectively, for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, stockwatering, fire protection, storage in the Detention Reservoirs, and supplemental irrigation of 125 acres. The Cozens Ditch 9 Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were decreed to be used in conjunction with the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By decree entered on June 16, 2019 in Case No. 18CW3144, 1.76 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Enlargement water right and 1.5 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Extension water right were made partially absolute for irrigation use. iv. Reservoir/Pond Storage (1) Mary's Pond A main source of augmentation releases for the South System is the Maryvale Reservoir (aka "Mary's Pond"), which was decreed in Case No. W-462 on April 10, 1972 for 32.58 af for domestic, recreation, irrigation, and fish culture uses. Mary's Pond was later decreed for augmentation use in Case No. 86CW258 (superseded by the decree in Case No. 98CW041). The Maryvale Augmentation Plan contemplates a 16 af enlargement of Mary's Pond and storage of water from the Cozens Ditch in Mary's Pond for augmentation releases. The Town acquired 20 af of the Mary's Pond storage water right, via the Deed. On September 4, 2015, Rendezvous/Grand Park and the Town entered into a "Grant of Easement and Augmentation Pond Joint Operations Agreement," which sets forth the parties' agreement and respective obligations regarding the joint operation of Mary's Pond. Express provisions of this agreement anticipate that the Town and Grand Park will enter a similar easement and operations agreement relating to operation by the Town of the Detention Ponds on Grand Park, for augmentation use under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The current active water storage capacity of Mary's Pond is approximately 14 af. Releases from Mary's Pond are currently the primary source of augmentation water for out -of - priority depletions associated with operation of the Maryvale Wells. (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights The final decree entered on December 31, 1999 in Case No. 99CW315 adjudicated storage rights for ten detention reservoirs: Maryvale K-1 a Reservoir, Maryvale K-1 b Reservoir, Maryvale K-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-3 Reservoir, Maryvale E -F Reservoir, MR -1 Reservoir, MR -2 Reservoir, MR -3 Reservoir, and MR -4 Reservoir. The six Maryvale Reservoirs (K -la, K-1 b, K-2, J-2, J-3, and E -F), referred to above as the Detention Reservoirs, are contemplated as augmentation storage sites in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the Detention Reservoirs will be filled during the summer under the Cozens Ditch water right, and excess consumptive use credits and winter return flow water from the Cozens Ditch will be stored in the reservoirs. In the fall and winter, the Detention Reservoirs will be drawn down in order to replace winter stream depletions. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed conditional for irrigation, aesthetic, piscatorial, recreation, municipal, commercial, industrial, and for augmentation and exchange. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed in the cumulative amount of 36 af: K-1 a (7.0 af); K-1 b (5.0 af); K-2 (10.0 af); J-2 (2.0 af); J-3 (6.0 af); and E -F (6.0 af). Three of the Detention Reservoirs, K-1 a, K-1 b, and K-2, have been constructed, filled, and put to beneficial use in the following amounts: K-1 a (a series of three reservoirs with a total capacity of 3.43 af) and K-1 b and K-2 (one combined reservoir with a total capacity of 13.6 af). 10 These three reservoirs are currently operated by Grand Park, but will be operated for augmentation purposes by the Town in the future. The three constructed reservoirs are located in different configurations than originally decreed, and are more than 200 feet from their decreed locations. The decree issued in Case No 08CW194 states: "[p]rior to making any of the subject conditional water rights absolute, Applicants or their successors shall obtain a decree confirming a change of location for any structure that is located at the originally decreed location." Thus, Grand Park/Rendezvous will need to file an application for change of water rights to reconcile the as -built locations of the reservoirs with the decreed locations before seeking to make the water rights absolute. The Deed conveyed to Fraser 32.7 af of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. C. Other Water Rights i. Decreed Exchanges (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange In Case No. 85CW337, on October 2, 1989, a conditional right of exchange was approved to allow the exchange of Windy Gap water from Granby Reservoir to the nine Fraser Wells, which are the decreed "exchange to" locations. The exchange is decreed for 25 af, conditional. No separate uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for the Fraser Wells (i.e., irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes). The exchange allows diversion from the Fraser Wells, via exchange, when the water rights associated with the Fraser Wells may not otherwise be in priority. (2) Middle Park Exchange In Case No. 90CW235, on June 8, 1995, a conditional right of appropriative exchange was decreed for 80 af. The decreed exchange contemplates the exchange of Middle Park water from Granby Reservoir to various "exchange to" locations that include Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, the Gaskill Ditch, Wells RM-5, RM-6, and RM-7, Detention Reservoirs K -la, K -lb, K-2, J- 2, J-3, E -F, and Mary's Pond. Sixty-five af is currently leased to Rendezvous/Grand Park. No separate independent uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for each "exchange to" structure. II. Physical Water Demands and Physical Supply A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR The North System supplies water generally to the "Old Town" Fraser area, and Byers Peak Ranch (pursuant to an out-of-town service agreement) and, temporarily, a portion of the Grand Park development. Table 3 is a current demand table, and includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volume demand estimates for the geographic areas currently served by the North System. 11 In this analysis, Old Town Fraser's and Byers Peak Ranch's annual demand per EQR are assumed to be the same. This demand is based on an assumption of 275 gallons per day per EQR. Indoor average annual demand estimate for these areas is 0.308 af/ EQR. Irrigation demand estimates are based on previous Brown & Caldwell water supply planning work for the Town. In the Fraser area, the irrigation season varies from year to year based on monthly temperatures during the "shoulder months" of the irrigation season. The irrigation season is generally considered to begin in May and end in September. Outdoor annual demand for the Old Town Fraser's and Byers Peak Ranch areas is based on a 500 square foot lawn per EQR and an irrigation application rate of 1.01 af per acre ("ac"). These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.012 af/ EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.320 af/ EQR. The Grand Park indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/ EQR. This value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree in Case No. 98CW41 (which is converted from EQRs as defined in that decree). The irrigation season as defined by the 98CW41 decree is May through September. The Grand Park outdoor annual demand is based on a 250 square foot lawn per EQR with an irrigation application requirement of 1.387 af per ac. These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.008 of/EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 of/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The North System currently serves a total of 962 EQRs, 184 of which are located in in Grand Park. Based on these values and the "af/EQR" values above, the current Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch annual indoor demand is 239.8 af/yr, and the current irrigation demand is 9.0 af/yr. For the Grand Park area currently served by the North System, the current annual indoor demand is 56.7 af/yr and the current irrigation demands is 1.5 of/yr. Thus, the total current North System indoor demand is 296.6 af/yr and the total current irrigation demand is 10.5 af/yr. The total current North System demand is 307.0 af/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The max day demand is a gpm water delivery rate and is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells, or future surface sources, which supply the North System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Max day demand during the irrigation season is 0.312 gpm per EQR. Current max day demand for the 778 EQRs in the Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch areas is 242.9 gpm. Current max day demand for the 184 EQRs located in the Grand Park area currently served by the North System is 56.0 gpm. Thus, the total current max day demand for the North System is 298.8 gpm. B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water Per EQR The Town's South System supplies water to Rendezvous and Grand Park which comprise a geographic area located within the Town's municipal boundaries. Table 4 is a current demand table and it includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volumes of water currently required for the areas served by the South System. The South System indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/EQR. This value is taken from the Maryvale Augmentation 12 Plan decree issued in Case No. 98CW41. This decree also indicates that for purposes of operating the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the irrigation season is May through September and the irrigation demand value is 0.008 of/EQR. The outdoor annual demand in the decree is based on 250 square feet of lawn per EQR and 1.387 of/ac/yr. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 of/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The South system currently serves 465 EQRs. Based on these values and the "af/EQR" values above, the current annual indoor demand is 143.3 af/yr and the current annual irrigation demand is 3.7 af/yr. These values result in a current annual demand for the South System of 147.0 af/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The South System max day demand values are derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The average day indoor demand from the decree is 0.191 gpm/EQR and the average day irrigation demand is 0.012 gpm/EQR. The total average day demand is 0.203 gpm/EQR. The max day demand is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells supplying the South System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Based on the irrigation season average day values and the 1.5 max day factor, the max day indoor demand for the South System is 0.286 gpm/EQR. Based on the current 465 EQR total, the current South System max day demand is 141.4 gpm. C. Current Water Supply for the North System i. Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield The North System's current water supply is from Fraser River alluvial wells. Table 5 identifies the Fraser Wells and their current average pumping rates during two periods, (1) spring and summer and (2) winter. The Fraser Well locations are shown on Figure 3. The spring and summer wellfield pumping total is 735 gpm and the winter wellfield pumping total is 458 gpm. The difference is due to two wells (3b and 9) being utilized/available seasonally. Fraser Table 5 Wells and Pumping Rates Well Spring & Summer Pumping Rates (gpm) Winter Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 120 120 2 78 78 13 3b 70 0 5 125 125 7 70 70 8 65 65 9 207 0 Total 735 458 The concept of "safe yield" with respect to the Fraser Well's includes wellfield production planning, such that the wells are capable of meeting Fraser's max day demand. One aspect of wellfield planning to achieve this goal is to have an installed wellfield capacity that exceeds the current max day demand. The current safe yield plan is that the Fraser Wells will be equipped with a total production capacity that is 100 gpm greater than the current max day demand. The additional, safe yield, 100 gpm wellfield production capacity allows for well and well equipment maintenance and repairs such that the North System will be able to meet max day demand when one well is not operational. As previously discussed, the current production capacity of the Fraser Wells is 735 gpm in the spring and summer, and 458 gpm in the winter. Table 3 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 399 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Fraser Wells can meet the current max day safe yield demand. In the future, the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System will be served by the South System. When this transition occurs, the Fraser Wells will obtain an additional 58.2 gpm of capacity to meet demands on the North System. This capacity, and additional wellfield improvements, will be required to meet development demands as projected into the future. ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The North System currently relies on seven wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed within the Fraser River alluvium. Table 6 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Fraser Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State's well permit files, HRS report files, and information from the Town staff. The table includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and recent water level data which was used to estimate saturated aquifer thickness. Static water level data was provided by Town staff for each of the active wells. These water levels were calculated based on measured water depth above the pressure transducer and an assumed transducer depth setting near the pump intake. D. Current Water Supply for the South System i. Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield 14 The current water supply for the South System is from the Maryvale Well, which are completed in the Troublesome Formations. Table 7 lists the Maryvale Wells and their current pumping rates. The Maryvale Wells are numbered 1, 4, 5, and 7. The Maryvale Well locations are shown on Figure 4. As noted in the comments column on Table 8, Well No. 6 is permitted only as a monitoring well. Maryvale Wells Table 7 and Pumping Rates Well Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 87 4 43 5 134 7 85 Total 349 The current combined production capacity of the Maryvale Wells is 349 gpm. Table 4 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 241.4 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Maryvale Wells are capable of meeting the current max day safe yield demand. When the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System, are permanently transitioned to the South System, the South System's safe yield max day demand will be 299.6 gpm (141.4 gpm + 58.2 gpm + 100 gpm). The current combined pumping capacity of 349 gpm for the Maryvale Wells will be sufficient to meet this demand. ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The South System currently relies on four active wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed in the Troublesome Formation which underlies the Fraser River alluvium. Table 8 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Maryvale Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State's well permit files, HRS report files and information from the Town staff. Table 8 also includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and static water level data which was used to estimate the saturated thickness of the aquifer. Static water level data were taken from well construction reports for each well, as water levels in these wells are not monitored by Town staff. E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the North System 15 The estimated total number of EQRs at buildout for the North System is 4,863 EQRs. The following EQRs are included in the buildout estimate: Old Town Fraser, Byers Peak Ranch, and possible future annexations. Using these categories, the total number of projected, future EQRs is: Old Town Fraser — 1,530 EQRs, Byers Peak Ranch — 1,233 EQRs, and future annexations - 2,100 EQRs. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Table 9 provides the annual volume of water required at buildout for each of the areas listed above. The values shown in Table 9 include: Old Town Fraser 489.4 af/yr, Byers Peak Ranch 394.4 af/yr, and future annexation - 671.7 of/yr. The total annual buildout demand is 1,555.5 af/yr. The values on Table 9 show that the annual irrigation volumes required at buildout are small percentages of the total annual demand. iii. Max Day Demands Table 9 also provides max day and safe yield max day demand estimates in EQRs intervals by area. Safe yield max day demand values are obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 1,577 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 1,677 gpm. The EQR estimates and their corresponding safe yield max day demand pumping rates will be used to help determine and plan for future wells, water supply infrastructure, and water rights acquisitions/strategies that will be required to meet the future North System safe yield max day demands over time. The purpose of Table 10 is to track Fraser wellfield installation, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future North System demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQR for the South System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System The estimated number of EQRs at buildout for the Rendezvous and Grand Park areas, served by the South System, is 2,822 EQRs. This total EQR value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The 2,822 EQR total includes the 184 EQRs currently served by the North System, and 91 EQRs contemplated under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree to be served by small capacity wells. Currently none of the 91 small capacity wells have been constructed and it is not likely any of these wells will be constructed. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation With a total EQR estimate of 2,822 EQRs, and an annual value of 0.316 of/EQR, the total annual demand estimate for the South System is 892.4 af/yr. Of this total, 869.0 af/yr is for indoor demand and 23.4 af/yr is outdoor irrigation demand. iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands The total max day demand estimate during the irrigation season for 2,822 EQRs under the South System is 858.2 gpm. This value is based on an indoor max day value of 0.286 gpm/EQR and an outdoor irrigation demand of 0.018 gpm/EQR. Table 11 provides demand 16 estimates in EQR intervals of approximately 200 EQRs. Safe yield max day demand values were obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 858.2 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 958.2 gpm. The EQR estimates included in Table 11 will be used to help determine and plan for the future wells and water supplies infrastructure that will be required to meet the future demand to be served by the South System. The purpose of Table 12 is to track installation of additional Maryvale Wells, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future wellfield demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. CONCLUSION Current and future water demand and supplies for Fraser's North and South Systems are discussed and quantified above in the Physical Water Demands and Supply section of this report. Significant conclusions and recommendations from the above discussions and work performed include the following: 1. Fraser's North and South System wellfields have the capacity to meet current safe -yield max day demands. The Future Demand to Buildout tables and spreadsheets (see Tables 9 through 12) for the North and South Systems are based on incremental EQR increases. The spreadsheets should be used in the Town's water supply planning to understand the max day water supply requirements of additional EQRs on the Town's water supply systems. 2. The Town should continue to promote and support water conservation, particularly during the irrigation season. 3. Water supplies for additional development beyond the current demands should be in place at least three months before the water is needed. This recommendation may require that water supply development work begin no later than two years before the water may be needed. 4. If Water Court applications are required to obtain new water rights or to change the Town's current water rights, this work should begin no later than three years before the water is needed. 5. The Town should continue to monitor and record all well pumping and water level data (both static and pumping levels). 6. Regular review of the water well production and water level data will be important to determine when pumping equipment and well maintenance should be performed. Pumping equipment should be removed from wells and inspected at approximately five-year intervals. At this time a video survey of the well should be performed and appropriate well rehabilitation work completed. 7. The onsite water supply potential should be evaluated for any new annexation area. 17 8. The Town's current augmentation storage is sufficient for its current water supply demand. Additional augmentation storage will be necessary to meet future legal and physical water supply requirements. 9. Accounting for both the North and South Systems should continue to be updated on a monthly basis, and the Town should continue to work with the Colorado Department of Water Resources staff with respect to water rights accounting matters. 10. The Town's St. Louis Creek and Elk Creek surface water rights continue to be important components of the Town's future water supplies and planning efforts. 11. The Town should continue to evaluate possible water rights/storage acquisitions that may arise in the future, to provide additional certainty and protection against increasing demands and changing legal and climatological circumstances. 12. The Town should continue incrementally perfecting its conditional water rights through the diligence and Water Court process. The Town should vigilantly protect its legal water supplies by monitoring and prudently participating in Water Court proceedings potentially impacting the Town's water rights. 13. The Town should continue to be an active participant in all existing and future water related agreements with third -parties, and proactively steer its water supply development activities to maximize the benefits of those agreements (e.g., the Clinton Reservoir -Fraser River Water Agreement, the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement). 18 wum 001141 um,mi r.912 rw,mlll, W,m�u1411, MEW W ATE EFFICIENCY N I11111111;;;I;;I1IN)IIPIIIIPiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIjjIIIIIIIIiNIR�dVxfiihh`11Y�ouu 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 11 1 �Nm a ul u I l l ll,�IIIIIIII uIIIIUIIIIIN�V°wii'i p1 Il��i�illtlll'ruodr I�Iluii tllYltl tl � lll puuuiuv „„„,,,,, „ OImp9VIWl+a+y„,, „, , �j 41Yfiii, %11111101 0. nn January 2023 II ii,Vllp'IIIiiIIVII'1111lllllll lll g�''illlllli ' diu�INd����IlhBtlhI�IIIIIIIIII�IVitll��h,�, d' fl(i, llllllnlA� ,�wm I IiIM� Sul Iwo 00 Prepared by Merrick and Company D 0 MERRICK® RECEPTIIION#:.2 70 4241, 06/05/2017 at 01:57 :24 Pll , 1 OF 15, R $' 3.0 , Adoitmonal Names Fee: II,Jm o -c Code:AGR Sara L. Roselle, Grand County Cerk, TO OF F ER WATER & WASTEWATER SERVICE AG ' EMENT BY PE PROPERTIES, LLC; BYERS PE DOWNHILL PROPERTIES, LLC; C. CL ' LIPSCOMB and ' DITH C. LIPSCOMB The parties to this Water and Wastewater Service Agreement (this "Agreement") are the TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado ("Fraser" or "Town"), and BYERS PEAK PROPERTIES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, BYERS PEAK DOWNHILL PROPERTIES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and C. CLARK LIPSCOMB and MEREDITH C. LIPSCOMB (collectively "Developer"). RECITALS A. Fraser is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Colorado. Developer is comprised of two limited liability companies organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado and two individuals; B. Developer owns property it intends to develop, referred generally as Byers Peak Ranch and the Lipscomb property, more specifically described in Exhibit A (referred to herein as "the Property"). Developer intends to develop 1,233 Single Family Equivalent units ("SFE") for the Property, which is located outside the Town's current boundaries; and C. The Town is authorized to provide water and wastewater service outside the Town's corporate boundaries pursuant to Colorado law, C.R.S.§ 31-35-402 (2013), C.R.S. § 31- 35-512 (2013), and the Town currently provides out-of-town water and wastewater service; and D. The Fraser Board of Trustees has had the opportunity to review with Town Staff and legal counsel the proposed extension of water and wastewater services to the Property, and the Board finds that this Agreement with Developer for out-of-town water and wastewater service is in the best interest of the Town; and E. Developer plans to develop the Property in several phases, by recording of successive final plats, and this Agreement will apply to the extension of all water and wastewater service to such approved plats; and F The water and wastewater service for the Property will require the design, planning, permitting, construction, and installation of water and wastewater lines to be built at Developer's cost to connect the Property to Fraser's water and wastewater infrastructure; and G. The Town agrees to provide Developer water and wastewater utility service pursuant to the terms of the Fraser Municipal Code ("Code") and pursuant to the terms and conditions specifically outlined in this agreement; and Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 2of12 H. This Agreement shall become effective and upopon n tion of a Resolution by the Fraser execution hereof by the appropriate Board of Trustees approving its execution Fraser official and by authorized agents of the Developer. The date of the latest of such conditions to occur is referred to as the "Effective Date". NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, mutual d accepted, tprro promises e and and covenants adequacy y herein contained, and for wled other the Town and De elopered er agree as follows: of which is hereby acknowledged, P " LE ATE S 'VICE 1. Water Service. Upon approval of this Agreement, finale plat developments on tagrees to he Property treated municipal water service to Developer for its approved fithe Code, and all other applicable laws, subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, ipates rules and regulations under local, state and eveloral law. While the Developer development will ot exceed 1,233 SFE. t3 Unless planning multiple phases, in total the fin p revisions noted below, such otherwise approved by Fraser in writing, and under cost recovery p water service shall be limited to use by Developer on the Property. a. Demand Limit and Town Ca aci . The Town agrees to provide Developer sufficient water per SFE, to meet Developer's water demands for up to 1,233 SFEs, as such supply is described by the Code. Fraser' s Water Rights are reasonabl adequate etosuppolop a rt t the potable municipal water service for existing town users, future and the SFEs on the Property, subject eino terms Fraserand shall conditions ioresponsibleh herein. 11 Except as otherwise provided herein, applicable implementation, operation and accounting requirements necessary to serve the Property with sufficient water as provided by the Code. pay 2. Water Plant Investment Fees. Developer and future wn water plant investment feeshall ate Fraser's water plant investment fees at a rate q to the in o charged by Fraser for in -town property owners and governed by the Code at the time of connection. The water plant investment fee shallbe investmentpaid n fee per SFE prior to fee must be paid inefull prior to issuance of a building permit by the County. Each water plant Fraser delivering water to the SFE at issue. The Developer a °paid Plant Investment Feean rvals prior shall include a requirement that a landowner demonstrate p to the County accepting a landowner's building permit application for County review unless lpermit landowner has an alternative ©n 9shofeproviding water service for the building p es question in accordance with Section 3. Water Service Fees. Developer and ot�eer future owners er service fee rate charged generally shall pay Fraser's water service fees at a rate equal to 1.1 times by Fraser on a quarterly or other periodic basisand use any means by the ander itstCode or other are not timely paid, Developer agrees that Fraser may state or local law, including discontinuing service foregoing, di idual Fraser shall connection, have the right to certify payments. Without limiting the generality of Out -of --Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 3 of 12 delinquent service fees and related charges to the County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as taxes, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-20-105. Developer agrees to include such details in any property owner association covenants. 4. Raw Water Irrigation. Developer may install, at Developer's sole cost and expense, a non -potable irrigation system to irrigate all areas on the Property. No Fraser water or water connections shall be used for such raw water irrigation. However, water supply for fire hydrants and public drinking fountains may be made in compliance with the Code. Irrigation with Fraser's potable water shall be limited as required under the Code, and this restriction shall be noted by Developer in any property owner association covenants. 5. Future Water Right Cases. The Developer agrees not to oppose any water rights application filed by Fraser for the purpose of findings of reasonable diligence, making absolute Fraser's conditional water rights inventory. In addition, Fraser agrees that it will not file opposition to future diligence cases or cases to make conditional water rights absolute for conditional water rights owned by Developer. Developer shall not pursue an independent water system except as provided in Section 9, below. ASTE ATE I'% SERVICE 6. Wastewater Service. Upon approval of this Agreement, Fraser will provide municipal wastewater/sanitary sewer service to the Property to serve final plats adopted by Grand County, up to a maximum of 1,233 SFE, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and the applicable provisions of the Code. 7. Wastewater Plant Investment Fees. Developer and other future owners of the Property shall pay Fraser's sanitary sewer plant investment fees (also referred to as wastewater plant investment fees) at a rate equal to the in -town sanitary sewer plant investment fee rate charged generally by Fraser and governed by the Code for in -town waste water users at the time of connection. The wastewater plant investment fee shall be paid in full per SFE prior to the issuance of a building permit by the County. Each wastewater plant investment fee must be paid in full prior to Fraser connecting its sewer service to the SFE at issue. The Developer agrees that its County approvals shall include a requirement that a landowner demonstrate a paid Plant Investment Fee in Fraser prior to the County accepting a landowner's building permit application for County review unless the landowner has an alternative means of providing sewer service for the building permit in question in accordance with Section 9 hereof. 8. Wastewater Service Fees. Developer and other future owners of the Property shall pay Fraser's sanitary sewer service fees (also referred to as wastewater service fees) at a rate equal to 1.1 times the in -town sanitary sewer service fee rate charged by Fraser on a quarterly or other periodic basis and governed by the Code. If wastewater service fees are not timely paid, Developer agrees that Fraser may use any means under its Code or other state or local law, including discontinuing service to the individual connection, to enforce timely payments. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Fraser shall have the right to certify delinquent service fees and related charges to the County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 4 of 12 taxes, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-20-105. Developer agrees to include such details in any property owner association covenants. TE S PLIC IIt;LE TO iii , T ' ATE ASTEWATER SE VICE 9. Alternative Water and Sewer Service. Developer agrees that the Fraser water and wastewater services to be provided under the terms of this Agreement will be utilized for all or substantially all of the future development on the Property, provided that Developer may elect to have certain large -lot development served by wells and septic systems, in accordance with Grand County requirements, where it would be unfeasible or uneconomical to use Fraser's central water and wastewater services. If any such large -lot development is proposed, Fraser will be provided the proposed preliminary and final plats, including any plans for wells and septic systems, and Fraser may consult with the Developer and Grand County regarding such plans, but Fraser shall not oppose or withhold Fraser's approval of such plans unreasonably. It is further agreed that nothing contained herein shall require Developer to discontinue use of any alternative water and/or sewer facilities serving any part of the Property as of the effective date of this Agreement, and Developer shall only develop the municipal and domestic water sources for which water rights and approvals are being sought in Case Nos. 14CW3097 and 14CW3098 in the event Fraser is unwilling, unable, or is in breach of its obligations to provide potable municipal water service under Section 1, above. 10. Mill Levy Equivalent Surcharge. As provided in the Code, if Fraser subsequently imposes a property tax mill levy for water and/or sewer improvements or operations, a surcharge shall be added to the water and/or wastewater service fees payable pursuant to this Agreement to account for such mill levy. The surcharge will be in an amount determined by the Fraser Board of Trustees, and certified and communicated in writing to the Property Owners not less than 90 days prior to enacting such surcharge. Fraser agrees that such surcharge shall not exceed the same or approximately the same amounts as a Fraser resident would pay if the Property was subject to such mill levy and shall only apply to property being served by Fraser. 11. Fraser Plant Investment and Service Fee Allocations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Fraser may adjust the total combined water and sewer plant investment fee and/or service fees to disproportionately allocate more of the fee to its water fund or sewer fund so long as the aggregate fee of the combined water and sewer fees does not exceed the rates set forth above. 12. Review of Plans. Developer agrees that all subdivision plats and plans submitted to the County for the Property shall also be submitted to Fraser for review and comment, as to water and wastewater connections to the municipal systems. Developer agrees to reimburse Fraser for all costs, including consultant fees, incurred for review of the design plans for water and wastewater facilities submitted pursuant to Section 13 hereof, and for inspections of facilities constructed pursuant to such plans and designs. Payment of such reimbursement shall be due within thirty (30) days after billing by Fraser. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 5 of 12 13. Connectn to Fraser's Wa rr and. Wastewater Facile°.tied. a. Design for Connection. Developer shall provide design and engineering information for the water main line connections and/or wastewater main line connections and all related facilities and easements to Fraser not less than 60 days prior to construction for Fraser's approval by not later than the 60 day period, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided that connections shall be made at locations that will minimize the immediate and foreseeable costs to Fraser. Such designs and plans shall be in compliance with the Grand County development approvals. The parties agree that all design and construction shall also be in compliance with Town water and sanitary sewer standards and sizes and installation requirements, as governed by the Code and Town regulations. Developer shall be required to execute an improvement agreement in the form customarily used by Fraser for subdivision development, with security as provided by the Code for the water and sanitary sewer improvements on or before the fmal plat recording for any final plat. Developer may commence construction of water lines and wastewater lines upon approval of the construction plans by Fraser's engineer. There shall be no connection made to Fraser's then existing system until the required easements for such lines are secured and demonstrated to Fraser (and compliance with other terms of this Agreement and requirements of the Code). b. Connection Costs. Developer shall be solely responsible for all costs, materials, labor and fees required to construct water main lines on and off the Property including, if necessary to serve the demands of Developer, any upsizing to connect to Fraser's water main lines, and for constructing wastewater main lines on and off the Property including, if necessary to serve the demands of Developer, any upsizing to connect to Fraser's wastewater main lines, including Town inspection charges. The Plant Investment Fees, referenced above, constitute Fraser's revenue source for all other off -site water and wastewater infrastructure that may be needed to provide water and wastewater service to the Property, including but not limited to, additional capacity, wells, water treatment plants, water storage, and water tanks. c. On -Site Improvements; Inspections and Fees. Developer shall install all water and wastewater main lines, service lines and stub -outs, meters and necessary improvements and facilities upon the Property at its sole cost and expense, including provision of all insurance, without any reimbursement from the Town. Such water and wastewater service lines and connections, including water metering, shall be subject to all requirements of the Code and other regulations generally applicable in Fraser, including but not limited to required inspections and requirements for installation and testing of backflow prevention devices. d. Easements. All required easements for water and wastewater lines, both on -site and off- site of the Property required to serve the Property shall be obtained by Developer, and proof of such easements shall be provided to Fraser prior to connecting such lines to Fraser's then existing system. Such easement agreements shall be in the customary and Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 6of12 usual form required by Fraser for water and wastewater service lines and infrastructure, and shall be obtained and finalized at Developer's sole cost. e. Ownership. The requirements of the Code for preliminary acceptance by Fraser of any water main lines, wastewater main lines, or other required improvements shall be met prior to Fraser providing service to any of the lines or required improvements. Developer shall convey all water and wastewater main lines, related infrastructure and easements as required by the Code, upon approved preliminary acceptance of such lines. i. Outside Connections. Developer agrees that it will not allow any water or wastewater users, other than landowners within the approved County final plats for the Property, to access any water or wastewater main lines, any water or wastewater improvements, or service without written consent from the Town. If users that are outside of the Property seek to connect to the lines, they will either be required to enter an out of town service agreement with Fraser, or annex to the Town, with such option at Fraser's sole election. To the extent the Town determines that other users may connect to the Developer's water service or wastewater service lines, Developer is not obligated to provide any additional easements and shall be entitled to cost recovery based upon pro rata usage or some other equitable formula as agreed to by the parties, in accordance with the provisions of Section 15 hereof. 14. Infrastructure Construction, Conveyance and Warranty. Developer agrees to conform to the development standards in the applicable provisions of the Code with regard to infrastructure construction and acceptance related to water and wastewater service. For a period of one year after dedication and acceptance of all of the required improvements to the Town, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, Developer shall warrant the construction, installation and survivability of the required improvements to the standards required by the Code. At Developer's sole cost and expense, Developer agrees to make all needed and necessary repairs and replacements required for Code compliance, including but not limited to, defective materials, design or workmanship, breach of contract, failure to abide by approved plans or standards, but not associated with ordinary and normal wear and tear. Developer agrees that notice of completion, all inspections and warranty notice timing shall be as dictated by the Code and Fraser's regulations. 15. Developer is only responsible for costs associated with on -site water and wastewater main lines that are reasonably required to service the Property. If Fraser requests that the water or wastewater main lines be constructed by Developer with extensions or excess capacity to serve property not within the Property, Fraser shall notify the Developer in writing. The parties shall enter into a supplemental written agreement to confirm the details and the additional costs of the proposed extension or excess capacity and the terms of reimbursement of the additional costs to Developer by Fraser or the other property to be served. Fraser agrees it shall not extend lines paid for by Developer to another property without such supplemental written agreement in place. Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for on -site water and wastewater infrastructure and easements pursuant to such a supplemental agreement. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 7 of 12 16. Annexation, Termination. In the event all or any portion of the Property is subsequently annexed to the Town, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated as to any annexed property and such property shall thereafter be subject to the provisions of the Code with respect to the provision of municipal water and sewer service, including the rates payable for such service. 17. No Guarantee of Quality, Quantity or Pressure. The Town's agreement to provide water and wastewater service pursuant to this Agreement does not constitute a guarantee that such service will be of a certain quality or that it will not be subject to periodic interruption due to natural or other causes beyond Fraser's control. Fraser shall not be liable for any such conditions affecting the water or wastewater service hereunder, except as provided by and to the extent allowed under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101 et seq. or any successor statute. 18. Enforcement and Application of Town Code. Time is of the essence hereof. The parties recognize and agree that the Town has the right to enforce its rules, policies, regulations, Code provisions for the extension and use of Fraser's potable water and Fraser wastewater collection and treatment for any units served by Fraser's potable water and Fraser's wastewater system. Without limiting the foregoing, Developer agrees that the Town may also enforce any violation of the Town's rules, policies, regulations, ordinances, or Code provisions relating to the water and wastewater service and the terms of this Agreement by mandatory or prohibitory injunction or specific performance as allowed by Colorado law. The Town agrees that Developer may similarly enforce the terms of this Agreement as allowed by Colorado law. The parties agree that no term hereof shall be materially amended, changed or frustrated by any subsequent change in the Town Code. 19. Public Utility Status. The parties agree that for purposes of this out-of-town service, the Town is not a public utility for water and wastewater service compelled to serve other properties, or subject to review by Colorado's Public Utility Commission. To the extent allowed by law, Developer agrees that neither it, nor its successors in interest or assigns shall at any time petition the Colorado courts, the Board of County Commissioners of Grand County, the Town, or the Public Utilities Commission or any other governmental entities to require service to any property or to acquire jurisdiction over the water treatment and distribution systems or wastewater collection and treatment systems of the Town. 20. No Waiver. Failure of a party hereto to exercise any right hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right and shall not affect the right of such party to exercise at some future time said right or any other right it may have hereunder. 21. Notices. All notices required to be given shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid, properly addressed to the person or entity to whom directed at the address shown herein, or at such other address as shall be given by notice pursuant to this paragraph: Town of Fraser: Fraser Town Manager With copy to: Rodney R. McGowan, Esq. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 8 of 12 P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, CO 80442 Developer: Byers Peak Properties, LLC Byers Peak Downhill Properties, LLC C. Clark Lipscomb & Meredith C. Lipscomb P.O. Box 30 Winter Park, CO 80482 Attn: Clark Lipscomb clark@cstoneholdings.com Cazier & McGowan P.O. Box 500 Granby, CO 80446 rod@mcgowan-pc.com With copy to: Kevin L. Patrick, Esq. PatricklMillerj Nato P.C. 229 Midland Avenue Basalt, CO 81621 patricl@waterlaw.com 22. Force Majeure. No party shall be held liable for a failure to perform hereunder due to wars, strikes, acts of God, natural disasters, floods, drought or other similar occurrences outside of the control of that party. 23. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be or become invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each and every provision shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 24. Amendment. Except as expressly provided for herein to the contrary, this Water and Wastewater Service Agreement may not be amended, except by subsequent written agreement of the parties. 25. Indemnity. Developer shall indemnify and hold the Town harmless from any liability for events or occurrences arising from the Town entering this Agreement and/or providing water or wastewater service to Developer, except where such liability arises due to the negligence or willful misconduct of the Town. To the extent permitted by law, the Town shall indemnify and hold Developer harmless form any liability for events or occurrences arising from the Developer entering this Agreement and/or providing water or wastewater service to the Property, except where such liability arises due to the negligent or willful misconduct of the Developer. Nothing contained herein, however, shall constitute or result in any waiver or diminishment of and defense or limitation available to the Town under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act or other applicable law. 26. Attorney Fees. In the event of any litigation between the Town and Developer relating to this Agreement, the court shall award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs incurred in connection with such litigation, including attorney fees. 27. Subject to Annual Appropriation. This Agreement is not intended to create a debt or other multiple -fiscal year financial obligation of Fraser, and any financial obligations of Fraser hereunder are subject to annual appropriation in accordance with Article X, § 20 of the Colorado Constitution and other Colorado law. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 9 of 12 28. Other Co ents. a. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer agrees to cause its affiliate, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC, to abandon and promptly (within 60 days) file a written withdrawal of its application with the Town for a permit to construct a wastewater treatment plant on the property described as Lot 2, Meyer Subdivision, and Cornerstone and Town shall direct their respective counsel to file a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice in Grand County district Court Case No. 2015 CV 30126, with each party to pay their own costs and attorney fees. b. Within 60 days after execution of this Agreement, Developer shall cause its affiliates, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC and/or Grand Park Development LLC, to execute and deliver to Fraser a good and sufficient special warranty deed conveying a parcel containing approximately four 4 acres, known as Planning Area 6W, as described in the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan recorded on November 8, 2005 in the real property records of the Clerk and Recorder of Grand County as Reception No. 2005-012709, as amended, and as provided in the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement for the Rendezvous Property, dated June 4, 2003 and recorded December 30, 2003 at Reception No. 2003-016733, as amended. Failure of Developer to satisfy these commitments within the time allowed shall be grounds for Fraser to terminate this Agreement, by written notice to Developer. 29. Contractual Obligations. Each of the Developer entities agrees to be jointly and severally obligated under this Agreement to fulfill the responsibilities, obligations and provisions agreed upon by Developer, including without limitation those provisions relating to default and the remedies and cures associated with the same. 30. Assignment. This agreement shall not be assigned by Developer without the written consent of Fraser, and Developer agrees that such consent may be withheld in the event Fraser determines in its reasonable discretion that the proposed successor or assign does not have financial capacity to perform the obligations of Developer herein. 31. Entire Agreement. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect hereto and supersedes all prior written and oral agreements and representations of the parties. 32. Authorization. By executing this agreement, the parties acknowledge and represent to one another that all procedures necessary to contract and execute this agreement have been performed and that the person(s) signing for each party have been duly authorized to do so and to bind said party to the terms and conditions hereof. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 10 of 12 33. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in multiple parts as originals or by email or facsimile copies of executed originals; provided however, if executed and evidence of execution is made by electronic copy, then an original shall be provided to the other party(ies) within seven days of receipt of said electronic copy. 34. Recording; Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be recorded in the real property records of the Clerk and Recorder of Grand County, Colorado, and shall constitute constructive notice of this Agreement and all of its individual provisions. The provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants and servitudes which shall burden and run with the land comprising the Property and the burdens and benefits hereof shall bind and inure to the benefit of all estates and interests in the Property and all assigns and successors in interest to the parties hereto; provided, however, that the rights and remedies granted to the Developer hereunder shall be limited to the Developer and its permitted assigns, and such rights and remedies shall not be available to any future purchaser of a lot or parcel included in the Property that is provided water and/or wastewater service hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hand and official seals the day and year first above written. TO OF FRASER, COLORADO ATTEST: Antoinette cVeigh, Town Cle STA1"E OF COLO 4 DO ) SS. COUNTY OF GRAND By: hilip Vandemail, Mayor 153 Fraser Avenue P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 81637 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Philip Vandernail, as Mayor, and by Antoinette McVeigh, as Town Clerk o the Town of Fraser, Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: ary Pub. 1 111 11 111 .1111. , 2017, by ANTOINETTE MCVEIGH Notary Public - State of Colorado Notary ID 20174004888 ' My Commission Expires Feb 1, 2021 Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 11 of 12 STA 1'E OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF GRAND ) Subscribed and swom to before me Clark Lipscomb as authorized agent for and Peak Downhill Properties, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: SOU' 4111'40T. .1R1 u, STATE OF COL NO HD ONII mNIVNempl1ieau 010 uNN Do C. Clark Lipscomb, President As Authorized Agent for and on behalf of Byers Peak Prooyerties, LLC M BYERS : D PRO > l C. Clark Lips c b, Preside As Author' Agent fo and on behalf of Byers P ropeis C this, Z �� day of / a" , 2017, by C. on behalf of Byers Peak P operties, LLC and Byers III ' i.6, oll unmouuuos Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 12 of 12 STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF GRAND Subscribed and sworn to before me this `a day of Clark Lipscomb and Meredith Lipscomb, individuals. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: M K 'E E N TAR Pit til; $1""A" f ter r t ° t �S 'f' X ]PI '.OPERT'Y : ESC1 1,:PT] N 1 YE E.A]K A parcel of land, being Government Lot 3, Government Lot 4 EXCEPT the Westerly 440 feet thereof, and a portion of the south 1/2 of Section 19, and the N1/2NE1/4 of Section 30, all in Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6th P.M., Grand County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast Comer of said Section 19 and the Northeast Corner of said Section 30, a 3" iron pipe with a 3-%2" brass cap stamped USGLO 1933; Thence South 00°34'13" East along the easterly line of said Section 30 a distance of 1,317.29 feet to the North Sixteenth Corner of Section 29 and said Section 30, whence a leaning 2" iron pipe 1 foot above ground with a 2-1/Z" brass cap stamped "LS# 12479" bears North 31°28'41" East 0.51 feet, also whence the East Quarter Comer of said Section 30, a found 2-%2" brass cap stamped "USGLO 1933" bears South 00°34'13" East a distance of 1,317.29 feet; Thence North 89°55'10" West along the North Sixteenth line of said Section 30 a distance of 2,629.96 feet to the North -Center Sixteenth Comer of said Section 30, a set #5 re -bar with a 3-1/4" aluminum cap stamped "LS #24669", whence the Center Quarter Corner of said Section 30, a found #6 aluminum rod with a 2-W' brass cap stamped"DWD LS #16398, 2001" bears South 00°56'13" East a distance of 1,330.77 feet; Thence North 00°56'13" West along the North -South Centerline of said Section 30 a distance of 1,330.77 feet to the South Quarter Corner of said Section 19, a set #6 re -bar with a 3-%4" aluminum cap stamped "LS #24669" re-established per monument record sheet ties prepared by Thomas M. Carpenter, LS# 16398, dated 8/30/1996; Thence South 89'22'12" West along the southerly line of said Section 19 a distance of 2,181.82 feet to a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669", whence a 1-1/2" aluminum cap stamped "LS# 11415" bears North 52°17'06" East 1.63 feet, also whence the Southwest Corner of said Section 19 bears South 89°22'12" West a distance of 440.00 feet to a found 2" galvanized pipe with a 2-1/2" brass cap stamped "USGLO 1933"; Thence North 00°14'02" West a distance of 1,322.19 feet to a found 1-%2" aluminum cap stamped "LS# 11415"; Thence North 54°59'49" East a distance of 1,167.79 feet; Thence North 00°09'11" West a distance of 684.98 feet to the northerly right of way line of CR-73 as recorded in Book 95, Page 184; Thence North 89°50'49" East along said right of way a distance of 1,296.54 feet to the westerly Corporate Limit of the Town of Fraser; Thence South 00°14'50" East along said Corporate Limit a distance of 29.94 feet; Thence North 89°48'07" East along said East-West Centerline of Section 19 a distance of 1,303.12 feet to a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669" on the westerly right of way line of the Union Pacific Railroad, whence the East Quarter Comer of said Section 19, a found 2" pipe in concrete with a 2-%2" aluminum cap, bears North 89°48'07" East a distance of 1,266.48 feet; Thence along said right of way the following three (3) courses: 1. South 14°40'05" East a distance of 989.32 feet to a point of curvature, a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669"; 1 2. Along the arc of a curve to the left having a central angle of 59°21'29", a radius of 816.78 feet and an arc length of 846.18 feet (chord bears South 44°20'50" East, 808.84 feet), a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669"; 3. South 74°01'34" East a distance of 415.27 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of CR-72 as recorded in Book 105, Page 278; Thence leaving said Union Pacific Railroad right of way South 04°38'38" West and along said easterly right of way line of CR-72 a distance of 98.01 feet; Thence North 89°38'52" West leaving said easterly right of way a distance of 40.11 feet to the westerly right of way line of said CR-72; Thence North 04°38'38" East along said westerly right of way line a distance of 97.13 feet to a point of non -tangent curvature on the southerly right of way line of Fraser Valley Parkway (CR-721) as recorded in Book 450, Page 480; Thence leaving said westerly right of way and along said southerly right of way and along the arc of a curve to the right having a central angle of 49°28'57", a radius of 244.97 feet, and an arc length of 211.56 feet (chord bears South 65°35'58" West, 205.05 feet); Thence South 00°20'10" West leaving said southerly right of way a distance of 11.01 feet; Thence North 89°38'52" West a distance of 618.10 feet; Thence South 00°06'05" East a distance of 900.00 feet to a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669", whence a found 2-%2" iron pipe bears North 25°31'29" West a distance of 5.46 feet; Thence South 89°37'46" East along the southerly line of said Section 19 a distance of 899.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 12,868,892 square feet, or 295.429 acres, more or less. OPERTY ESC TION — LIPSC P "%, J PERTY A parcel of land, being a portion of the south '/2 of Section 19 in Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6th P.M., Grand County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the West Quarter corner of said Section 19; Thence North 89°50'49" East along the East-West centerline of said Section 19 a distance of 1,400.23 feet; Thence South 00°09' 11" East a distance of 654.98 feet; Thence South 54°59'49" West a distance of 1,167.79 feet to a point on the South Sixteenth line of said Section 19; Thence South 89°36'54" West along said South Sixteenth line a distance of 440.00 feet to the South Sixteenth comer of said Section 19; Thence North 00°14'04" West along the westerly line of said Section 19 a distance of 1,324.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,530,896 square feet or 35.145 acres, more or less. 2 SEC. 24 T1S, R76W CLARK & MEREDIMM LIPSCLNJB AREA -35.145 ACRES IOVT LOT 3 Hiumbt OT 4 BYERS PEAK PROPERTIES, LLC AREA -286.425 ACR ES SAM Wis. OM. MOW Tv MT TO FR& R YAUEY P _ K A-nit ( p BYERS PEAK DOYRHQL PRCPERitE,a*, LLC AREA..36 ACRES t NE 11 /4 SEG 30 MENA T7IEOMP. Y. T O14910P POINT 6i BEGINNING SEC. 20 plVirt III,HIIg1VlllmlI 1111,1 Imm V 'M Irdiliiu�iuV IV 911P1ii��i��ii�ll;llligglll, TOWN OF FRASER FRASER FIRMING PROJECT STUDY 1�1N'11 ti 1 �111�11111111.1,1111111111111 1.111,1 0 11�� ' rvgW;Mp�a�wWlrvrvrvrvW April 29, 2015 "IV,°ui1IlXill1i 1l,,,iiI1)IY'1iul 1 �I T own of If- raser PO Box 3/0 k"Ilsusol , CO 80412 12 odtk',(r 9/0 CA 5491 HX 9/0.06 0,'r WWW.dirds>,erQ c'rUrru “lo c'() TOWN OF FRASER FRASER FIRMING PROJECT STUDY JRS Engineering Consultant, LLC 6013 E. Briarwood Drive Centennial, CO 80112 James R. "Jim" Swanson, P,E. (303) 726-5577 f."' CD BOX £!t,`r s r Prepared By: HRS Water Consultants, Inc. 8885 West 14th Avenue Lakewood, CO 80215 Mark R. Palumbo, Principal Hydrologist (303) 462-3030 ( 555--1»41,91 : r 970.. 551£8 FRASER FIRMING PROJECT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 SECTION 2. INTRODUCTION 4 2.1 Background 4 2.2 Purpose 4 2.3 Scope 4 SECTION 3. ELK CREEK DITCH No. 2 DIVERSION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS.. 5 3.1 General 5 3.1.1 Water Rights Considerations 5 3.1.2 Design Criteria 7 3.2 Forest Meadows Augmentation Site 7 3.2.1 Site Analysis 7 3.2.2 Preliminary Design 11 3.2.2.1 Intake 11 3.2.2.2 Storage 13 3.2.2.3 Outfall 14 3.2.3 Preliminary Environmental 15 3.2.4 Capital Cost Estimate 16 3.2.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost 16 3.3 Grand Park Planning Area 6W Augmentation Site 16 3.3.1 Site Analysis 16 3.3.2 Preliminary Design 17 3.3.2.1 Intake 17 3.3.2.2 Storage 19 3.3.2.3 Outfall 20 3.3.3 Planning Area 6W Augmentation Site Storage Alternative 21 3.3.3.1 PA 6W Augmentation Site - Alternate 1 21 3.3.3.2 PA 6W Augmentation Site - Alternate 2 21 3.3.4 Preliminary Environmental 22 3.3.5 Capital Cost Estimate 24 3.3.6 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost 24 3.4 Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 Diversion Repair 24 3.4.1 Site Analysis 24 3.4.2 Preliminary Design 25 3.4.3 Preliminary Environmental 27 3.4.4 Capital Cost Estimate 27 3.4.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost 28 SECTION 4. ST LOUIS CREEK DIVERSION 29 4.1 General 29 4.1.1 Water Rights Considerations.... ................. _ ..... ............... ____. ...... .........._. 29 4.1.2 Design Criteria 29 4.2 Gaskill Headgate & Flume Repair 29 4.2.1 Site Analysis 29 4.2.2 Preliminary Design 30 4.2.3 Preliminary Environmental 30 4.2.4 Capital Cost Estimate 30 4.2.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost 31 4.3 Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site 31 4.3.1 Site Analysis 31 4.3.2 Preliminary Design 32 4.3.2.1 Intake 32 4.3.2.2 Storage 34 4.3.2.3 Outfall 34 4.3.3 Preliminary Environmental 35 4.3.4 Capital Cost Estimate 36 4.3.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost 36 4.4 Potable Treatment of the St. Creek Louis Diversion 36 4.4.1 Water Rights Considerations 36 4.4.2 Design Criteria 36 4.4.3 Site Analysis - Gold Medal Ranch Water Treatment Facility 37 4.4.3.1 Preliminary Design 37 4.4.3.2 Intake 37 4.4.3.3 Treatment and Pumping 39 4.4.4 Site Analysis - Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility 40 4.4.4.1 Preliminary Design 40 4.4.4.2 Intake 40 4.4.4.3 Treatment and Pumping 42 4.4.5 Environmental 43 4.4.6 Capital Cost Estimate 44 4.4.7 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost 44 APPENDICES: Appendix A -- Fraser Decree, Case No. 83CW363 (Water Division No. 5). Appendix B -- Forest Meadows Preliminary Design Information. Appendix C -- Environmental Forms and Requirements. Appendix D -- Grand Park Planning Area 6W - Preliminary Design Information. Appendix E -- Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 - Preliminary Design Information. Appendix F -- Gold Medal Ranch - Preliminary Design Information. Appendix G -- Fraser Civil Action No. 183 and Decree Case No. W-2280 Appendix H -- Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion - Preliminary Design Information EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1 - Project Site Map 6 Exhibit 2 - Forest Meadows Reservoir Location, Case No. 83CW362 Exhibit "A" 8 Exhibit 3 - Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout 10 Exhibit 4 - Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir Easements 12 Exhibit 5 - Grand Park PA 6W Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout 18 Exhibit 6 - Grand Park PA 6W Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout - Alternative Location 23 Exhibit 7 - Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout 33 Exhibit 8 - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion @ Gold Medal Ranch - Preliminary Layout 38 Exhibit 9 - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion @ Blue Zone Treatment Facility - Preliminary Layout 41 Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 of the signed Recovery Agreement, included with the Corps consultation letter to the US Fish and Wildlife Services, will assist to streamline the consultation process. 4.3.4 Capital Cost Estimate: The itemized preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost is included in Appendix F - Gold Medal Ranch Preliminary Design Information. This estimate is based on current unit cost pricing. Projections of this cost into future years will require application of a factor to allow for inflation. The estimated construction cost for the Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site is $728,040. The estimated total project cost (excluding easement or land acquisition costs) for the Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site is $982,854. 4.3.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost: Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs have been estimated to include routine maintenance, routine inspections, facility management, and other expenses to operate and maintain the facility. A detailed estimate is included in Appendix F - Gold Medal Ranch Preliminary Design Information. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost for the Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site is $13,180. 4.4 Potable Treatment of the St Louis Creek Diversion: 4.4.1 Water Rights Considerations: St. Louis Creek is a tributary to the Fraser River. Fraser's St. Louis Ditch Enlargement and Extension water right diverts from the Gaskill Ditch. The location of the Gaskill Ditch headgate, from St. Louis Creek, is at Landmark Point 183 as shown on Exhibit 1. Fraser's diversion from the Gaskill Ditch is shown on the Exhibit 1 Project Site map at landmark point 184. Fraser's diversion ditch will convey water from the Gaskill Ditch to the proposed St. Louis Creek water treatment plant. Fraser's St. Louis Ditch Enlargement and Extension surface water rights were originally decreed in Civil Action No. 183 for one cubic feet per second ("cfs") for irrigation. This water right was changed in Case No. W-2280. This case changed the point of diversion to the Gaskill Ditch headgate and the water right's beneficial uses to domestic, fire and sanitary, garden and lawn irrigation, and other household uses. A copy of Civil Action No. 183 and the Water Court decree, Case No. W-2280, are each included in Appendix G. Section 4.1.1 discusses St. Louis Creek water availability. Gaskill Ditch diversions typically take place from May through October. Fraser's St Louis Creek water rights could normally divert in April through July. From August to through March diversion would be possible from seven to sixteen days during each month. Surface water diversions in late fall, the winter, and earlier in the spring are complicated by freezing temperatures. 4.4.2 Design Criteria: Potable filtration treatment options are described herein to treat surface water, diverted from the St. Louis Creek, for use as a potable water source within Fraser's potable water distribution system. The filtration facility will be sized to produce flows of one cfs, an equivalent of 448 gallons per minute (gpm). Due to possible seasonal operation constraints created by the winter weather conditions, or a decision by Fraser, the treatment system can be either operated on an intermittent basis or on a full-time basis. The proposed treatment facility is a package filtration system contained within a building structure. Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 Two potable treatment facility site locations are identified as options. The first treatment site location would be located on the Gold Medal Ranch near the Gaskill Ditch headgate. This site allows for treatment near the source of diversion and pumping of the treated water into Fraser's potable water distribution system. This option is further described in Section 4.4.3. Site Analysis - Gold Medal Ranch Water Treatment Facility. The second treatment site proposed location is at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility located adjacent to Wapiti Drive at the north end of S. Wapiti Lane, extended. A raw water pump station would be located near the Gaskill Ditch headgate, with a force main extended to Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility. This option is further described in Section 4.4.4. Site Analysis - Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility. 4.4.3 Site Analysis - Gold Medal Ranch Water Treatment Facility: The proposed Potable Water Treatment Facility at the Gold Medal Ranch site is located downstream of the Gaskill Ditch headgate in an open meadow area adjacent to the access road to the Gaskill Ditch diversion. The treatment building site is located in the meadow adjacent to a treed area. The Potable Treatment Facility site is bounded on the north and west by the St. Louis Creek and on the south and east by open meadow area. The St. Louis Creek Potable Treatment Facility site is located near Landmark 185 as shown on Exhibit 1. Based on limited topography information available for the site, it appears that the southwest to northeast cross slope is in the range of three to eight percent. The site appears to be located outside of the 100 -year floodplain of the St. Louis Creek. It is proposed that the diversion will be taken from Fraser's Gaskill Ditch headgate at the location shown on Exhibit 8 - Potable Treatment of St. Louis Creek Diversion Cad Gold Medal Ranch - Preliminary Layout. 4.4.3.1 Preliminary Design: Preliminary design of the proposed Gold Medal Ranch Potable Treatment Facility is based on a system that will treat 500 gallons per minute (approximately 1 cfs). The proposed treatment system includes two filtration skids, each with capacity to treat water at a rate of 250 gpm. This design provides the flexibility to treat water at two flow rates (250 gpm or 500 gpm) and to operate the treatment system for a specific time period each day that best matches potable water demands. This package water treatment facility can either be operated year-round or seasonally. The proposed Potable Treatment Facility - Gold Medal Ranch water treatment system detail is further described in the following paragraphs: 4.4.3.2 Intake: For this alternative the "Intake" is defined as that segment of piping and structures needed to direct the surface water diversion from the Fraser's Gaskill Ditch diversion at the Gaskill Ditch head gate and flume to the treatment building. Starting at the lower location of the diversion intake: An 18 -Inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) would convey surface water from the St. Louis Creek, by gravity to a proposed underground raw water storage vault with overflow return. This underground raw water storage vault would contain a volume of water necessary to serve as the supply water to the treatment facility upon demand. This underground vault would be designed to contain a return flow system that when full, the excess surface water &f To wn of Fraser, CO m m ,ill m1111iuuuummu°m umoilllllliil. IRS r M OM, rr.,II TrA NT , I Ir Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion 6013 E Bnarwood Dove I Cenlennlal, Colorado 80112 P 303 726 5577 F 303 484 3833 Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 diversion is returned to the St. Louis Creek. Another 18 -Inch RCP will function as the return line to the creek. The RCP pipe manufacturer's detail are included in Appendix B - Forest Meadows Preliminary Design Information. A Raw Water Pump, located in the vault, would pump raw water from the underground storage vault into a water storage holding tank located at grade within the proposed treatment facility building. 4.4.3.3 Treatment and Pumping: The treatment facility would consist of an ultra filtration package treatment system with post treatment chlorination. Ultra filtration uses membrane filtration technology which is a pressure driven process that uses a semi -permeable (porous) membrane to separate particulate matter from soluble components in the carrier fluid (raw water supply). The ultra filtration membranes retain the particulate matter. Retained solids are concentrated on the membranes and thus each membrane periodically requires backwash. The raw water holding tank, located inside the treatment building, would serve as the start of the treatment process. Two calibrated pumps, each pump water from the holding tank to their respective skid mounted rack of membrane modules. Two skids each containing eighteen membrane modules are needed to treat one cfs of raw water flow. With this proposed configuration, the system can easily be operated at one-half cfs if needed to meet potable water demands. Filtered water from the ultra filtration process would be chlorinated and stored within a finish water clearwell located in a lower level of the treatment building. Potable water pumps located within the treatment building would pump treated water from the clearwell into Fraser's water distribution system through an 8 -inch C-900 PVC pipe. It is anticipated for this study, that the potable water will be pumped to the existing waterline distribution system near Carriage Road and Mill Avenue; and would replace the existing 8 -inch transite pipe through the cabin development at the Gold Medal Ranch within the North System of Fraser's system. New water taps to those existing water customers along the existing transite waterline being replaced are included as a part of the proposed project. This filtration system requires periodic backwash. Based on the treatment facility operating at full capacity, twenty hours per day and seven days per week, it is estimated that the facility could generate approximately 23,000 gallons of backwash water per day. This backwash water can either be discharged to an on -site sand filtration system or be discharged to a sanitary sewer system. For this system an optional integrated neutralization system is proposed that minimizes the volume of backwash water to dispose of. Typical manufacturer's literature in included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion - Preliminary Design Information. The sand filtration system would include a covered sand filter whereby silts and other particulate matter is separated from the return water. Return water is pumped back to the front of the treatment facility and the solids are periodically removed and properly disposed of off -site. An optional backwash water disposal method could include its discharge into a newly constructed gravity sanitary sewer line extension from the alley, between Carriage Road and Norgren Road, at Mill Avenue to the boundary of the Gold Medal Ranch. This option could serve this facility as well as serve a secondary function by extending future sanitary sewer Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 service to the cabin development by connecting service taps. After evaluating the two options the sand filtration system is included as a part of the proposed system. If the gravity sanitary sewer system were installed in lieu of the sand filtration system the Estimated Construction Cost would increase by approximately $105,000. The Total Estimated Project Cost would then increase by approximately $141,750. It is estimated that there could be an annual cost savings (operations and maintenance cost) of approximately $24,000 per year with installation of the sanitary sewer system in lieu of the sand filtration system. Electrical service including 480 V, Three phase service will be required at the treatment building site. It is recommended that easements be secured on the Gold Medal Ranch parcel for the proposed treatment facility, structures, piping, electrical service line and vehicular access located within the parcel boundary. It is recommended that easements also be secured along the proposed pipe route along the driveway through the cabin development for 8 - Inch C-900 PVCP waterline and, if selected, the 8 - Inch SDR-26 PVCP sanitary sewer line. 4.4.4 Site Analysis - Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility: The proposed Potable Water Treatment Facility option located at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility would share the site with Fraser's current well water treatment facility. This option would divert water from the St. Louis Creek at the Gaskill Ditch headgate and convey it to a proposed underground raw water vault and pump located on the Gold Medal Ranch adjacent to Fraser's existing chlorination building. Raw water would be pumped from this underground vault to the expanded treatment facility building at the Blue Zone Treatment Facility. The proposed raw water underground vault and pump would be located downstream of the Gaskill Ditch headgate in an open meadow area adjacent to Fraser's existing chlorination building near Landmark 188 as shown on Exhibit 1. Based on limited topography information available for the underground vault and pump site, it appears that the southwest to northeast cross slope is in the range of three to eight percent. The site appears to be located outside of the 100 -year floodplain of the St. Louis Creek. It is proposed that surface water will be diverted from Fraser's Gaskill Ditch headgate at the location shown on Exhibit 9 - Potable Treatment of St. Louis Creek Diversion @ Blue Zone Treatment Facility - Preliminary Layout. 4.4.4.1 Preliminary Design: Preliminary design of the proposed Blue Zone Potable Treatment Facility is based on a system that will treat 500 gallons per minute (approximately 1 cfs). The proposed treatment system includes two filtration skids, each with capacity to treat water at a rate of 250 gpm. This design provides the flexibility to treat water at two flow rates (250 gpm or 500 gpm) and to operate the treatment system for a specific time period each day that best matches potable water demands. This package water treatment facility can either be operated year- round or seasonally. The proposed Potable Treatment Facility - Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility system detail is further described in the following paragraphs: 4.4.4.2 Intake: For this alternative, the "Intake" is defined as that segment of piping and structures needed to direct surface water diversion from the Fraser's Gaskill Ditch diversion at the Gaskill Ditch Town of Fraser, CO m m i �'iil Milli �d�6o o1 I'Id'il°'''1111," ' „,„„1„11111111111111111 "I JRS F NG I NFFRING CC, NSI II TA NT ,11 C Potable Treatment of St. Louis Div ersion @ Blue Zone Treatment Facility Site 6013 E Bnarwood Dove I Cenlennlal, Colorado 80112 P 303 726 5577 F 303 484 3833 Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 head gate and flume to the proposed treatment building located adjacent to Fraser's current Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility. Starting at the lower location of the diversion intake: An 18 -Inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) would convey the surface water diversion from the St. Louis Creek, by gravity to a proposed underground raw water storage vault with overflow return. This underground raw water storage vault would contain a volume of water necessary to serve as the supply water to the treatment facility upon demand. This underground vault will be designed to contain a return flow system that when full, the excess surface water diversion is returned to the St. Louis Creek. Another 18 -Inch RCP will function as the return line to the creek. The RCP pipe manufacturer's detail are included in Appendix B - Forest Meadows Preliminary Design Information. A Raw Water Pump, located in the vault, would pump raw water from the underground storage vault through approximately 9,400 linear feet of new 8 - Inch C900 PVC pipe into a raw water storage vault at the proposed treatment facility. Another raw water pump would then pump into the water storage holding tank located at grade within the treatment facility building. The raw water line would generally follow a route along the shared access drive through the cabin development to CR 73; then follow CR 73 to the Town Limits where it becomes Mill Avenue, then following Mill Avenue, crossing under the Union Pacific Railroad track to a point adjacent to Highway 40. At that point the raw water force main would cross under Highway 40, in the area of the former Visitors Center, and then cross under the Fraser River and extend in a northerly direction along S. Wapiti Lane to Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility as shown on Exhibit 9. 4.4.4.3 Treatment and Pumping: The treatment facility would consist of an ultra filtration package treatment system with post treatment chlorination. Ultra filtration uses membrane filtration technology which is a pressure driven process that uses a semi -permeable (porous) membrane to separate particulate matter from soluble components in the carrier fluid (raw water supply). The ultra filtration membranes retain the particulate matter. Retained solids are concentrated on the membranes and thus each membrane periodically requires backwash. The raw water holding tank, located inside the treatment building would serve as the start of the treatment process. Two calibrated pumps, each pump water from the holding tank to their respective skid mounted rack of membrane modules. Two skids each containing eighteen membrane modules are needed to treat one cfs of raw water flow. With this proposed configuration, the system can easily be operated at one-half cfs if needed to meet potable water demands. Filtered water from the ultra filtration process would be chlorinated and stored within a finish water clearwell located in a lower level of the treatment building. This can either be a separate clearwell or a combined clearwell with the treated well water. Potable water pumps located within the treatment building would pump treated water from the clearwell into Fraser's water distribution system. This filtration system requires periodic backwash. Based on the treatment facility operating at full capacity, twenty hours per day and seven days per week, it is estimated that the facility could generate approximately 23,000 gallons per day. This backwash water can be processed through an integrated neutralization system and then either be discharged to an on -site sand filtration system or be discharged to a sanitary sewer system. Typical Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 manufacturer's literature in included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion - Preliminary Design Information. The sand filtration system would be a covered sand filter whereby silts and other particulate matter is separated from the return water. Return water is pumped back to the front of the treatment facility and the solids are periodically removed and properly disposed of off -site. It is unclear at this time if sufficient space exists at the Blue Zone Treatment Facility site for installation of the sand filtration system. It has; however, been included in the cost estimate for this system. Electrical service including 480 V, three phase service will be required at the proposed treatment building site. It is recommended that easements be secured on the Gold Medal Ranch parcel for the proposed treatment facility, structures, piping, electrical service line and vehicular access located within the parcel boundary. It is recommended that easements also be secured along the proposed pipe route along the driveway through the cabin development for the 8 - Inch C-900 PVCP force main. It is recommended that easements and/or license agreements be secured along the raw water force main route where the proposed raw waterline crosses private property and other agency rights -of -way. Preliminary information suggests that the existing Blue Zone Treatment Facility building is sited on an open space tract adjacent to a sixty foot wide tract extending north -south on the east side of the Blue Zone Treatment Facility building. Various electrical, gas and water easements are located on that tract. An in-depth investigation is needed at this potential site to determine the area available for the proposed filtration treatment system. 4.4.5 Preliminary Environmental: The proposed Potable Treatment Facility project generally includes construction of a package plant potable water treatment facility with a raw water force main intake line and a treated water outfall line connecting to Fraser's water system. Based on information from the Corps, this construction will require preparation and submittal of Nationwide Permit 12 (Utility Line Activities) Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Included in that PCN will be details of the project and its land disturbances along with: • A Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation of wetlands (PJD). • A determination and summary of the vegetation species. • An analysis of threatened and endangered species. • An analysis of migratory bird breeding areas. • A Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. A copy of the current required Nation Wide Permit No. 12 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) and the Colorado Regional Conditions are included in Appendix C - Environmental Forms and Requirements for reference. It is anticipated that the USACE will consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for depletions associated with the project. Based on information from the Corps of Engineers, the PCN should include the water decree information, as well as calculations and brief rationale of the annual depletion, 4:;u Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 in acre-feet, associated with the surface water diversion and storage pond evaporation. A Recovery Agreement, copy included in Appendix B - Environmental Forms and Requirements for reference, requires signature and inclusion in the PCN submittal if the applicant / owner would like benefit from the Endangered Species Act compliance under the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. It is understood that submittal of the signed Recovery Agreement, included with the Corps consultation letter to the US Fish and Wildlife Services, will assist to streamline the consultation process. 4.4.6 Capital Cost Estimate: The itemized preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost is included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion Preliminary Design Information. This estimate is based on current unit cost pricing for a 500 gallon per minute treatment facility. Projections of this cost into future years will require application of a factor to allow for inflation. The estimated construction cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at the Gold Medal Ranch site is $2,718,840. The estimated total project cost (excluding easement or land acquisition costs) for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at the Gold Medal Ranch site is $3,670,434. The estimated construction cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility site is $3,301,560. The estimated total project cost (excluding easement or land acquisition costs) for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility site is $4,457,106. 4.4.7 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost: Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs have been estimated for the current population base usage of approximately 250,000 gallons per day operating year -around. The Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs include routine maintenance inspections, facility operation and management, chemicals electrical usage, backwash water disposal and other expenses to operate and maintain the treatment facility. Detailed information of the treatment equipment and estimated volumes of backwash flows as well as the detailed annual operation and maintenance cost to operate the facility are included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion Preliminary Design Information. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at the Gold Medal Ranch site is $94,000. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility site is $94,500. Cost Estimate JRS ENGINEERING CONSULTANT, LLC Project: Date: Fraser Firming Study St. Louis Creek Potable Wtr Treatment at Gold Medal Ranch w/SFilterOption April 17, 2015 No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 3 Erosion Control 1 LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 4 Revegetation 5 AC $ 1,500.00 $ 7,500.00 5 18 -Inch RCP 900 LF $ 70.00 $ 63,000.00 6 18 -Inch Flared End Section 1 EA $ 900.00 $ 900.00 7 8 -Inch C-900 PVC Pipe 3600 LF $ 65.00 $ 234,000.00 8 8 -Inch A/C Replace w/C-900 PVCP 4000 LF $ 65.00 $ 260,000.00 9 Covered Sand Filter Bkwash System 1 LS $ 160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 11 Raw Water Underground Vault 1 LS $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 12 Treatment Bldg - Complete w/clearwell, pump, HVAC, piping, electrical, access, etc 1 LS $ 600,000.00 $ 600,000.00 13 Filtration Equipment 1 LS $ 595,000.00 $ 595,000.00 14 Disinfection & Misc Equip 1 LS $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 15 Electrical Service 1 LS $ 220,000.00 $ 220,000.00 16 Access Road Upgrade 1 LS $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 17 Asphalt Remove & Replace 590 TN $ 80.00 $ 47,200.00 18 Earthwork / Grading 200 CY $ 30.00 $ 6,000.00 19 Fence 200 LF $ 12.00 $ 2,400.00 20 Utility Locates & Potholing 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Subtotal Contingency Subtotal - Total Estimated Construction Cost Legal & Administrative Surveying Engineering & Construction Services Total Estimated Project Cost Easement Costs Not Included 20% 15% 5% 15% 2,265,700 453,140 2,718,840 407,826 135,942 407,826 3,670,434 Cost Estimate JRS ENGINEERING CONSULTANT, LLC Project: Date: Fraser Firming Study St. Louis Creek Potable Wtr Treatment at Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility April 17, 2015 No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2 Traffic Control & Permits 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 3 Erosion Control 1 LS $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 4 Revegetation 5 AC $ 1,500.00 $ 7,500.00 5 18 -Inch RCP 2950 LF $ 70.00 $ 206,500.00 6 18 -Inch Flared End Section 1 EA $ 900.00 $ 900.00 7 8 -Inch C-900 PVC Pipe 9400 LF $ 65.00 $ 611,000.00 8 UPRR Bore 1 EA $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 9 Highway 40 Bore 1 EA $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 10 Fraser River Crossing 1 EA $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 11 Raw Water Underground Vault 2 EA $ 40,000.00 $ 80,000.00 12 Treatment Bldg - Complete w/clearwell, pump, HVAC, piping, electrical, access, etc 1 LS $ 700,000.00 $ 700,000.00 13 Filtration Equipment 1 LS $ 595,000.00 $ 595,000.00 14 Disinfection & Misc Equip 1 LS $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 15 Utility Relocation/Connection 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 16 Electrical Service 1 LS $ 60,000.00 $ 60,000.00 17 Access Road Upgrade/Repair 1 LS $ 13,000.00 $ 13,000.00 18 Asphalt Remove & Replace 1500 TN $ 80.00 $ 120,000.00 19 Earthwork / Grading 600 CY $ 30.00 $ 18,000.00 20 Fence 200 LF $ 12.00 $ 2,400.00 21 Utility Locates & Potholing 1 LS $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 22 Covered Sand Filter Bkwash System 1 LS $ 160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 Subtotal Contingency Subtotal - Total Estimated Construction Cost Legal & Administrative Surveying Engineering & Construction Services Total Estimated Project Cost Easement Costs Not Included 20% 15% 5% 15% 2,751,300 550,260 3,301,560 495,234 165,078 495,234 4,457,106 Town of Fraser 1O -Year CIP Report Itita APPENDIX B DDD ERRICK® ASSET DATABASE a a E F c ® L Nll N o P a ® 7 ® ®® u a AN AO 4,,..29 v 4 = YIIIIN A ra Treatme nt Proc ea2L it k. 1 - a it �� C -q a £ > g =F : 4 Y - �� __ _ _ la �, °�� La RePl ace amenf -- em owTo cPo dion or n Reoalr�PSrLolcrr o an ual OPL o •ity ape on ` o- - v N VluP otG t- re 0 i NumUnrinO ea 7371 R4HI a r - 'e 15, c lU===III O � � Proincl Cn cl Y ose Pr Rated 80071 01 Criti cality _ D escriP[io n Re olnc=m=pltl4 P 1r ' 1EL0G1 ownea Proratetl sg /5 uto a y g„g `J V w )i ncl ude s F� ELA41 a tact Coal 9 13 Ra,er sLs Nonnw ell Fiala 100 Fr sa re7e11 No. 1Fraser No .1 Pump Piplmg . a. Electric 1982 2022 40 15 1 .0 15 2037 2037 11 ,4 236 5 280,080 pp, . R s 50060 5 24,000 $ ,4000 5 00000 $ 370000 1000 $ .70000 s 345,3.3 756. $ 270000 $ 22,206 Rs. 182 sLs Nonn w 5, Faa 200 Frase rv7e N52 .2 pun, pip, and Electric Fres- No 2 Ma Meter 19,2 282, 2020 48 ,5 1.0 15 2038 70 20 24 2010 2038 ,3 2044 17 ,3 21 ,7,. 88 , s 200.000 70660 000$ ,&806 s 00000 370000 100 . 370,000 5 32050 7, $ 274800 8 22,206 experien ce - 1,0 000 Guessi nal 3 509 S 00 800 3 000 19 000 S 5 ..2 7 _ e 13 13 ,8 Ravv ✓182 sLs Ravi',Pater 503s Rav ✓afarSts NOMNa F .21 000 Fasrr V7e No 9bNo. 3b Pump , Ppng North 4,11 Field 566 Fra se r No. 5 Pump Piping . and NSnmV&Faa 66 Frie r 7e No.7 o7pup, pir,i, and 987 '7021 260, 1981 20u 48 15 10 15 2035 48 16 t0 15 2029 40 15 t0 15 2037 2038 ,s 2025 6 2037 4 ,3 0 14 ,7,. 0% 93 ,: 5 206,006 5 70660 000¢ 1&006 s x0000 $ 070.000 100 , 370,000 6 926,667 756 $ 270000 $ 12,260 5 placeholler until HR n $ $ 200,000 79 009 S 24,900 $ 16.0 s 60000 $ 370.000 1006. 5 370000 8 25'50 $ 278000 $ 2 .12Pfl 5 5 n $ 5 20,06 5 79 009 s _4,006 $ 16.0 s 60000 $ 30000 106, 5 .3700005 345,333 75 , $ 278,009 $ 22,200 5 s p loll until HR 4 9 4 s 4 s 20 89 20 81 89 158 180 81 101.0 17cos rl ,3 Rev ✓9r..,s N5lelw a Faa 060 e se r037e NS.a oaPun p.Ppmg,ad x015 40 15 t.0 15 2034 2034 1, 1, 73 ,0 $ 6 $ s _0, s 70660 s 4x06 $ 1P000 5 60000 $ 370,000 1862, . $ 30600 s 01,333 6. 08600 $ z 06 rem. R5 13 1a t9 Ro v ✓0 1x,,5 NOMcad Fig 800 Fra ser e/e No.s o 5Pump, Ppn9, e nd 1908 2021 48 15 1.0 15 2030 2836 ,3 ,3 WA $ At 0 $ e S $ - $ s Ir n f or 28. s 7500 0000 s _4080 $ 16800 5 06.000 5 370,000 10720 $ ,v 0800 5 1857 x 5 00.000 $ .2280 5 5 - 4 5 20 0t 01 ,0 1.e t5 a Ro v/ ✓8 1x,,5 Nonn 150 0 an 00 axe/ 005 0300 0 Line .i4 to 015785/Lr 2020 19 75 168 w 1.0 60 2 05 20 35 12 12 202 . 00 S o $ 8 5 2,45. and $ 856860 $ 29448 5 196515 8 7.03.,7 s 4500,800 100,0 s 4540000 908.009 lox Y 3405008 20 $ 5675 0 5 5 6P LF 4 6 2c t6 t. t9 a1 u 6 �7 v 5, 13 13 13 13 13 ,3 1 t 1 Ra x .✓a far sys Rau .✓8 182 sys Re03 ✓e y Re7 . ✓e 03 Raj ✓a, t Rar ✓a, ys n Dis t Sys 8 PR. 0307 ys PR. 7s not ,, PR . Nonn v at Fltld 1001 RSw /,e ria.areiai5c 038,4 re/ 05,11 3126 LF a S765/LF 505 10 wen Fiala 160 ry. ✓03 a ll N5., .1 P5 mp Pip g. 50 03 nwe Feld 480 ry. .rvc No4 4P pPp 0, 58 03 nwe Faa 560 ryv .rvc NO3 .s p pu nn,Pp g, Dom, ha Faa 760 03' 7 .rvc N o7 7P r.PP 9. a nd Ele ctrical so ar w5, a 1000 Ra ..ve ,er7rec cm se 003 L e/4"tee, 9 a, $785/LF ble0550 t e5e ilans m 911 mLmer12" l age 3977 LF al $$1020/LF 05225:22 5\ Y 850 00250,6 03 'me (-,2"03588 118736 LF a, $7a5,LF w !e lt5,n r. n. Pei ABANDONED 2010 2661 2061 2,031 2001 18 75 2082 1975 1975 1975 160 80 1.0 60 2 070 40 15 40 15 2 023 40 15 40 15 2 023 41 15 ,1 15 20323 40 1c 10 15 2027 150 60 10 00 2 052 160 60 1.0 60 2035 160 e0 1.0 e0 222552125120 21052 5221-81 115 40 to 52 20 23 2070 47 200 6 2023 6 22 3 01 2023 u 20 62 38 2036 12 2027 u 47 0 0 0 33 12 4 7, , 0% 0% 9%26 5,55 . 65, 20,[ 8, 5 2,453,916 Westminst er LIG., $ 850 869 $ 294,489 $ 194313 8 73 .03.173 5 0500000 100, s 4540.800 $ 9,556393 75, $ 3400000 $ 56,75 0 5 5 GIS LF s 206,066 5 70660 5 24.0 $ 1&866 S 60.000 $ 8,0000 100,1 $ 5 70600 5 - 7 5/ $ 278060 $ 22,266 5 s s 20. 6 s 70660 s 24.0 $ 16,000 S 60 NO $ 370 .ON 1006. $ 3 70600 $ 7 r/ 5 278800 $ 22266 5 s place,h okler until PR 8 79 5. S 24, 8 110 S $ 270 .0. 10.. $ 372 a $ - / $ 2788 $ 5 s 3 200,000 S 70000 S 24.000 $ 15.800 S 0.03.000 $ ammo 100,. $ .370090 $ - 7 5/ $ 278000 $ 22,0 5 5 5 2,336,160 Westmi nster L1C and $ 81 7.656 $ 280333 $ 185.893 $ 70.03.8 +8 e 4322000 106, 5 4,322,000 $ 2,803,380 7e % $ 3242060 $ 54,025 5 5 S' LF S 4,0.,6,540 We stmi nster L1C a.$ 1.410 .788 $ 486,785 $ 324523 0 1 .21 0,062 5 7595000 400,P S 7..06.000 $ 1,501,000 75,:, 5 561 5660 $ 93,813 6 5 GAS LF We stmi nster LK a..85 $ 172,425,000 1665[ 5 12426,000 $ 3 8 5,206 75, 5 12 5320600 5 2155,325 0 8 0D LF $ 96,086 058 0,0370 yP 5 17.660 5 0,006 5 4866 s 1.7,000 $ .3, /> 12," S 93.600 $ 71.9 50 % $ 47600 $ 336 n .s 4 6 4 6 4 s 4 a 4 8 4 6 4 6 4 2 n z 20 0 37 20 es 20 es 2, 05 20 05 20 00 20 01 8 0.1 7 37 9 0.8 34 0.10-2015 4 8.9 18 , 18.8 89 188188 89 188 188 09 188 188 08 05, 0 5, 01 1.5 11 6 .1 09 0.1 37.2 0,3 2, p ze .0 31 .2 t t 1 >J 1atyss PRu6 03 01515250 PRvs 0307 y PRls , or 6/s&PR ls 101 0 PR%h208 ee fp. Ro ip, v 9ult St nrwre Ell" Ranc h FRV-259 sure Re e ,et ✓ala sP''''' P �7xo0 9 0,000 51 ✓e XStr u ru Old V.o ry Rd. 105 2005 2005 mw 90 2, 1. 9 15 2029 115 49 t9 52 204 5 80 25 1.0 25 2030 110 40 ,.a 5s 2045 2023 0 205 7 22 2030 7 2057 22 0 34 7 34 0% 65, Za n 650 $ 0585030 7vp s 2 0, 2,0 s 9,x00 s 0,000 5 22596 m 109.690 1866. $ 13..,000 $ - 50 50 $ 70.660 s 2,70 8 50,006 Westminster 77p s 175.0 5 6,008 5 4.0 5 1 5000 S 93.000 100 , S 9 3000 5 66,888 sox S 47 .000 5 938 0 5 $ Westmn yP 5 2x03,250 3 9,000 5 5,000 S 22 500 5 139000 106,. $ 13 .,000 5 5000 5 70.060 S 2 ,780 0 10 $ 50,000 Wo Ptm.n st or TYP 5 17500 5 6,000 5 4.000 5 15.000 $ .3000 100, 6 $ 06.000 s 60,808 5. 5 47 ,009 $ 930 9 5 0 2 4 4 6 z 7 en 18 0.1 7 au 152 6.8 0.1 8 .1 0.1 1 .4 1., 0.0 1 .1 0.1 .4 3s .6 1 1 os [, yss PR vs 203 osLsys a PR ls 03 of y PR l: 03o is[55es P RvsPressure PRV-358.PRV 3 P Re a las ve Ne, a Ppng V 1" lo rll PP. al Vau ll 5ruwmre O ld V ic to ry I,. Sou th FIt740. 50 ,ot ✓8505 p 9 503 va ult Structure Ra le , at 1030 1( n 2605 2005 2005 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2039 115 40 49 52 20 45 00 25 1.0 25 2030 115 40 t.0 40 .045 2030 7 2057 22 2030 7 2045 22 7 34 7 22 29, 65 ,0 280 5 5% $ 75,000 wwmmn st er,yp 5 20250 5 9,000 5 6000 8 22500 S ,39,000 1000 $ 139.800 S _8,920 50 % $ 70 .009 S 2,786 0 ,0 8 50,086 Wmminser 7yp 5 17500 5 6,000 5 4.066 5 15000 S 93000 100,0 $ 0,,600 S 86,50, s0/ $ 46 000 $ 936 0 5 S 75,800 We stmin ster yp S 20 .259 S 9,060 S 6 .060 S 22,5 90 8 139 000 100, . $ 1 38.860 5 38.920 596. $ 70.660 5 2,760 0 10 $ 50,000 Wsplmins te r Typ 5 17,500 5 6,000 5 4.000 3 15000 $ 93,000 100,. $ 9p0, p 51,,50 Sox $ 47 ,000 $ 930 0 10 0 2 4 4 4 2 7 09 18 0.1 15 09 0.0 0., 0 .1 0 .1 IA 1., 6 .0 9.5 0, n .8 5,5Pionee r 39 5,6Picrvr6 1 t nPis tsya 6PR va .0 03 PR ls 9olsl5 yse PR ls PR,+.is9 Valves Piping Rayon Rae 5,L ✓a m 55180528 10288 0, PlneOw 1PRu„P asema Ree ,x vn lresfl Pp 03g 2005 2065 2005 90 5,5 1.9 25 2030 115 40 t0 40 2045 90 25 ,. 0 25 2030 2030 7 2045 22 2030 7 7 22 7 2e, p. , ?e% $ 75 ,088 05003,03 max 2,,p 5 2000 5 9,000 5 6000 5 225 00 $ ,09.000 1060 $ 139 ,600 6 _8,920 500 $ 70 .600 5 2,780 0 16 =6,006 W.0 035 ,p S 17500 5 6,noo S 4066 S 15000 S 95000 100,. $ 93 ,060 5 51,150 5. 5 4 7060 $ 936 0 10 $ 75 ,806 w�,m 85 18 27/P S 2 6.50 S 9,800 S 6.000 S 22500 8 139000 100Y, $ 139 .000 S 38,920 bo x 8 70600 S 2,780 6 10 4 4 4 2 4 4 ,6 0.1 ,c 00 18 0 .1 0 .1 137 1.6 0 .0 09 0.3 0.1 1.8 19 q7 ts ye& va v✓oePR PRW79n el at 0 900 Strum ure 6,m (a 200. 5 115 40 t. 0 40 .0 45 2046 22 22 656. $ 50,000 050,03 nner,}p 5 17,. 0360 5 6,000 5 4.006 5 1 5000 $ 90,000 1000 $ 93000 5 01,1. .6 50 6. $ 47.660 $ 930 6 10 4 2 15 0 37 0.8 35, 0 5, 41 - 4z t 4 03os[sLs e PRva 6,a„arrnae ns Stn Pr PRVybll Pressure Re ieta v erress Ppne eer(R a/o reen) X005 15.9 90 _5 1. 0 25 20 30 ,0 m 1: 12 2023 2030 7 2023 0 7 0 2850 0% e s,m 05,82 77p5 202 50 5 s &006 s 2 2500 $ 139000 too,= $ 139660 s 3,,905 50 % $ 700605 2,756 0 ,0 s 2,0,5,036 We,mn„ /p $ 766360 242.100 $ 16,.446 a 005 400 6 373 4996 ,966. 6 3734.669 s - fool $ 30,669 a 298,7. 0 4 4 ,8 01 01 ,a 1 .0 5 ,888 %aaa PS,aeL, 030800030 maarpn Printe d on 0/13/2023 8 41 PM ASSET DATABASE U E F G N E w AN AIIA31 AN ll1III1I -9 &� ' a a�em =35;9 1� La cO� w� Tot Re olacemant r oie ci Co s Pti«at ' _ a O.v a! Dluea p R eo Reoatr Pr oienZPITE aCPMl11 To 0701500 R,plaS e�r P va Ciy- ELAB 03 50 pump s��, ne PS Green e too Green Pump g including �� 9 �4 , �� 036 32 7a% es e 5,9 s 30,000 $ 20.00, s 75000 $ 4 63.000 too, $ 463Coo s 343,943 9e y g 000 $ 8 , 5 vat. but si mihr , 4 ,9 ,, $2 , as 45Pun, 2 Pump Statio ns Stat.., PS omen zone • 102 Green Zone Boo ster Pump Builling b9 Ac ,.0^n PS Green zone 1 ea0, eter pump u ,, 1, nP 2005 2005 65 _0 t.0 20 2025 40 19 t.2 1e 2023 2025 2 2023 0 2 0 10% 0% s 100,000 w s 55000 s 12,000 s 8,000 s 80000 $ 182000 100,. $ 135,00 s 18,500 33,9 $ 02000 5 9, 250 0 0 9nty a merso $ 6,000 ratan Estimate 5 2 100 $ 72, s 480 E 1000 $ 12,000 100, $ 12000 $ - 750 S 0 .000 $ 720 0 5 o a 0 z a 07 7 0.8 0.7 i .a 2a 0.8 05 6.3 46 53 Pump Statio ns PS Gre en zone 100 Green Zone Boo ster Pump Pum p G2.15 NP 2005 40 15 t.2 1e 20 23 2023 0 0 0% $ 5,000 Falcon Esti mate 5 2 100 $ 72, s 480 E 1SOO $ 12000 1000 $ 12000 $ - 761 s 9.000 $ 720 0 5 c 2 7 as 0.9 05 6.3 47 54 7 Pumpstaeo ns Ps ereen zone 11 e e00ster Pump Pum ,,,,,n vm,e s,,, Pipme Station 2005 40 12 t.2 18 20 23 2023 0 0 0% s 500,000 Westminster Zone 5 PS $ 105.0 s 36,010 $ 24.000 s 90000 $ 555ol. 000 to $ 2 ,000 $ - 751 $ 417.000 8 0 5 gory algerso mns erraur-oat qa3 c 2 7 as 05 0 .3 6a 43 Sts 7 u psta9o ns PS Goren zone 113 Green Zone Boo stel Pump Pressure Gauges 2005 40 19 t .2 18 2023 202'3 0 0 0% $ 10000 Westmi nster NwiF s 5,500 5 1 .200 5 800 E 5.000 $ 1a, O. 100, $ 15,090 $ - 751 $ I50o 5 1 ,140 0 c c z 2 0.9 0.0 1.8 1 .e 49 56 pump„mica. PS .. .Zone -119 Green Zone Boo ster Pump eye0 Meter Station 2005 70 _a t.2 24 20 25 2029 2 6 25 ,6 $ 10000 We stminster 3,500 5 1500 5 Sac E 3000 $ 19,000 100, $ 1_090 $ 4,750 -S% $ 1 0.0. S 1,52, 0 5 c 0 s 7 Pumpstatio ns PS Green zone 11 e eoc,stet Pump Nac Station 2005 Ica .50 0 .,0 2035 2035 12 12 40 ,: 100000 w s 33,000 5 5 8,000 5 90 0, 000 $ .5.000 10 $ 185000 5 00 50% $ 93.0 5 9,259 5 10 (slight, Angerso mns enauve bat I6, c si s9 54 55 65 63 7 7 7 7 pumps,,,,, u ps 09008 p aeons p neon= Pump 51000 05 Pump Star.., PS Gre en zone Ili Green Zone Boo ster Pump PLC station PS GruOr 20 00 118 0000030 / u p auto ianelors vnoe 510500 PS Green Zo ne 120 eBooete r p ou ,ck oewnn en Stre wn Ps ereen zo ne t eeu.wte r y ae ne rna r S1awn PG Gre en zone 125 Green Zone eoc sler Pu mp SCAD S ana A ntennas stat ion PS P£aBooste r Pump euitling Station 2005 2006 2005 mw 2005 2005 zo 1, 1.9 1, 2023 100 30 1.z a6 2006 100 30 1.2 36 2033 109 30 1.2 33 2035 20 12 .o t2 2025 159 e0 70 2055 2013 0 1041 12 2041 12 2.1 12 2023 9 2075 32 0 1x 1a 10 0 52 0, sox 2 0, 2 oY o 0% 74, $ 50,000 w 17 t,9„ 509 s s 4,099 s 15 000 $ 03,009 199 , $ 93,990 $ - 199, $ 93.009 6 2 ,799 0 5 9my„„,, ,, s mme. .nauv. . nu a 1 $ 000 s 0,700 0 0 $ 00,000 W ustminst ur Z uns. 5 PS S 14.000 5 4,000 5 3.200 5 19 .000 $ 70.000 100, $ 78,.000 5 „2.000 00< 37 . (slightly la Westminst er $ 30,000 h 10 .500 $ 3,600 S 2400 $ 9 ,000 $ 50000 100 , $ 2, 000 $ 2,00 2, 8 0,00 $ 2,00 0 0 6035 5 100,000 Westminst er Z one 5 PS S 95,001 5 12.0 s 61000 s 38 ,000 $ 185000 10. $ 1:35,000 5 92,500 50, $ 93000 5 9 ,2.50 0 0 my larger so $ 20000 w 7000 5 s 1,80, $ x000 $ 87000 100,1 $ 37.0 $ - 100, $ 37 .000 s 1,850 0 5 a1 i9iigbty larger., s aPel 5 250,000 Westminster Zone 5 PS S e 509 5 30,000 $ 20.000 s 75000 $ 4 63.000 100 % 8 463,000 s 3409 09 33 , $ 153 .000 5 1,158 0 5 0 4 0 z 0 c 4 c 2 c 4 9 ,s z 07 4 0 .1 7 as 9 0 .0 0.9 8 .1 8.1 ,.r 7 .I 20.1 ,.1 9.2 0 .2 0.9 e.a 6 .3 0.0 3.2 0 .1 57 e4 pump Stato ns PS R9tl R. Zo ne Booste r Pump Building N9A c Station x005 65 _0 t. 0 20 2025 2025 2 2 10, 0o, $ 135.0 s 18,500 33. $ 02 9 5 1003,0 w s 55 000 s 12000 s 8, 30 000 5 250 0 0 o„ s 000 $ 16200 to g ory argerso at c a a 07 0.7 ?6 a 2 s3 35 7 u pStet o ns 005 10 1 u p u p . 1sHP " 20,5 40 192 1e 2023 2023 , 0 0% $ 20,0 Feton Estimate $ 7,0 $ 24, 5 160 E 600 5 0,000 100, s 00,00 $ - 7535 S 0000 $ <4, , s , z 7 0.9 o.e 0a 6.3 66 � Pnmpstat o ne P5A9q 1 _ Booste r Pump Pum p 9z 7s NP 2,05 a, a 1.2 ve 2023 2023 , , 0% $ 4,0„ Falcon Esti mate 5 1400 $ 480 5 320 E 1200 5 6.0 100 0 s 8,,00 $ - 75. S 6.000 $ aac o s c 2 7 090.9 9a 6a 60 s7 Pump shto ns PSRa '1 ouster Pump Pum p R3. 7.5 NP lion 2005 a0 12 t.2 18 202 3 2023 , 0 0% $ 4,0„ Falcon Esti mate 5 1 400 $ a8, s 320 $ 1230 5 5.000 10.. S 8,,90 $ - 75% 5 6.000 $ aac o 5 c 2 7 09 ,9 oa 6.3 61 se 60 7 Pump Statio ns Pump Statio ns 1. 07 ous te r Pump Punpw 326 HP Re�3 G9e 111 station ous te r Pump Pum p stet on Values and Piling 2005 2005 40 1t t.2 18 202 3 115 a0 t9 n 201St 2023 0 9057 22 0 38, 0% 6 53: 8 8,0,0 Guesstii nate for now 5 28 009 5 9,000 s 6000 s 24.000 $ 148000 100, $ 14,000 $ - 75% $ 111 ,0. S 8 ,880 o 5 5 3„0„ Westminster Zones PS $ 105 000 5 38,000 8 210,0 5 00900 $ 655000 tOO X e 525,00 5 362,885 33 Y $ 181„0 5 5030 5 9my Greer so li ve buts si milar c a c 2 9 as 0A ,5 8 .1 ,.1 0.0 0 .1 0.1 6a 64 6s 7 7 7 Pump Statio ns Pump star o ns Pump 50,05 PS R46 _cbe 112R. Zme Boos te r Punp Pressure Gauges Ps -41 j49 o uter Punp 5Me Meter PS Re a tOe 204 aea. am eeoo , er Punt MCC urn 2,05 2,05 2OCs 40 15 t.2 18 202 3 352 7, 20 24 2025 109 30 to 30 2035 2023 0 2029 2 0035 12 0 e 1z 0% 25, 40% 10000 Westminster N AS T 5 3,500 5 1,200 5 eat $ .3 .000 $ 19.000 100, $ 1.0,0 $ - 75% $ 1 1.,,0 5 1 ,100 o e 8 100,0 Westminst er Eat on Ps • 5 3,500 5 12,0 5 8,0 $ 3000 $ 19000 10.. . $ 19000 $ 4,750 75. $ 150,0 5 11-23 , b Sins. size 5 100,000 weemn eetm es PS s 55,009 5 µ00o 5 5000 - e 94,09 5 9 ,250 1a S 3n 900 $ 185000 10, % 135,000 s 7a 000 50, $ (5119104, larger so � 5 • ti ve but si milar e 2 ,tion , a 2 ,.9 1e 0.1 e5 13 1.9 ,.1 1 ., 1.0 e6 73 7 Pum p Stations P6 pad ous ter Putp PLc to n 200.. SO 1.. t.0 1.. 20 23 2023 e 0 0% 8 50.0 Westminst er Z on e 5 PS S 17 .x0 s 6,000 s 4,000 s 15 000 $ _3000 1001 $ 93,900 $ - 100,: $ 93.,,0 s 2 ,790 0 F. to,1910y .ar9 or so e tm 0 a 3 ,9 0, 8 .1 8.1 f 66 69 79 71 7 7 7 7 Pump Stations Purrips 3tons p nt one g et one Pump sero n= P&R$ WI 115 9, o gone Boo ster PUMP AmTansfer stitch ste tl, n Oa oo d zone Boo ,otor s'urso coo, 0awnn, a ur n 0 tY t oo etor v co n0 ram r wn P6rze3 m - o0s er P 570100 enan me nnoe PSpat2a s P. Zo ne Boos le r Pump H1,c1rosSa,Sts,s9e Ta nks 2,05 2000 2,05 2,05 2005 log 30 35.2 36 2065 100 30 2 36 2035 190 30 t.2 36 20 35 20 12 1.0 12 202 3 7O 2O 1.2 24 2025 204 1e 2041 12 2001 12 2023 0 202_ 2 19 18 16 0 6 Sox 50, 50, 0% 25 , $ 40,00 w eatm, 0,,, 0,, 0,5 Ps s 350000 s 4,6,0 s 0200 3 129„ a 70,093 1,010 $ 70,00 s 37,,,9 eo % a 07000 s 3,7,0 0 0 tse9 my 50301 eo $ 30,0,0 wag505 10500 5 3 00 ,600 5 24,0 $ 9.0 S 56,000 100, $ 55.000 s 23,000 5030 $ 2 a,000 5 2600 0 0 ttm�y 03 s Immo w4,034, c00 35 .0 S 12„ 0 S 3.000 s 3, ,000 $ 18500 10 D. $ 135.000 s 92,500 6, $ 93,00 s 925 0 0 0 t 0 S 1,3 0 5 $ 20,000 We stminste r ye7 009 s osloo S 1,600 8 5000 S soon leo,- S 37.000 $ - 100, $ 37„ 050 , t uls 8 40.0 Guesstimate for now S 14t s 4,800 s -4200 3 12100 $ 76000 109,. $ 71.000 5 18,500 75, $ 5 5000 s 5,920 0 5 0 2 o z 0 4 c z 0 6 2 ,.1 2 0.1 4 0.1 7 09 , 0 .7 ,.1 0 .1 ,.1 ,.1 3 .1 0.1 ,.1 9 .2 0.2 c.9 e .3 6.3 ,.1 7.7 1 .1 Printe d on 0/13/2023 8 01 PM ASSET DATABASE s.OPo IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 6 oo m a _ _ a a o o _ o a _a _g7g777 7,aga g-000 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 80x9. 6 =666 v a _m m m _ 7m,7e ____ 7 7 7 "'_ g 'g, <N, °°°^aa„a s1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 4 O 0 0 0 0 a aa a 7 = o_aaa a o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 a =a o aa J. :. .. _ _ _ _ ® oa a a a _ ..,_ oom000a o aa om o m 0 00 0 0 0 6666 a o m a_ mF mmm o o a 0 0 00 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 oe n m n.n n .. n .Ann.n.a in mm m M1. M1 _ `c. a w -m m n n 555x5 0 o � o 00 0 0 0 0000c o o 0 00 0 0 0 0000c _ m m !BF!, a _ n c _� m `.3c m a 33 � nwwm� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0a 0 0 0 000aa a � o o s. n 5 m n a n n e m r m a v 5 2 o a o 0 0 a a o 0 - m c w o 0 �n o o .� m y n 3 n n a 2 m ... 0 0 0 0 rm n g n .a m .nn n .n n .Pn.n a ea ee mm =_ 1 w - mm 1 m !FI gm 0 0 o a �o = o 0 66666 0 0 o a oo m m o 00000 __ rm r a a Pn 2 § o� n d 333ba n a m a a c o a _ _ m h v m �� m o o 5 _ e e s e .� 5_ m m 5 o 0 o a o o a a a o .o a_ r n n m m m m •P M 1111 Eu ¢- Tw d'80 1 nz1 onpuo0 o 0 9,1 7 . wpe�mf R. < 2 2!222 2 2 _ 2 2 < < 5 5' _5_�� ,22,,' mwxom m a a m .422 R R dddda d d d d d z z z z z zz z z 4 44445 z z 22 z z z d d z z = P � m i d m 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 33 33 d da p4, v'i ,y y h 58 m 58888 F; o a w 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 2 10 w ' 'il 2 m m m m m mm m m m o.... m m m a a m m m m m m mm m m m mmmmm m m m m m P r e4wnN eoN Hill 1111 ti ti Z ,' Z* ,- c m mammc m m m a D o o 2. a m m mm 2 2 o GOOOO O O 2 2 2_ 2 22Idmi2 m2m m m 2222121 1m m o, o, o, e 2 21 21 2111 11 11 1 122I I I 21 11 =1 2 < ASSET DATABASE saPa14$ IIIIIIIII�,,,,,,,,IIIIIIIIIII„� m m c ` c � D m � s '' c s T � m � ��� i� .; ' <N, °°°^aa„a sIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � 4 � ] 0 0 0 0 a a , 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 o_ m m _ _ _ _ a _ _ _ m m _ _ _ ® o o v o o , o P o o a a a v o r a a _ h. w m ! a e o v w r o w n 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0. n � � m a m m m m v ,c' - ry e n o 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 o 11111 .... � .0 �o]aenuo� 1 �J ui� id wpe�mf 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0' 0 2. 0 m o 0 0 m 73 m 7D c a q ' '2 ' (77 li E 1 o m m m m m s m m m m d s s x e m m ie9wnN eeitl nillllll 1 4 4 31 31 31 4 4 4 m1 4 4 n1 MI el 'i 31 M1 RI UNCONSTRAINED M ODEL 51 o 1 p 1 E 1 F 1 1 R 1 L1 K I L I M I N1 0 1 P 1 o 1R s 1 T 1 B I Date W21/2023 2 By. 3 Description uneon stmn ed model. ,rmoey,. on Ire. writ epe eellasselewbe„ ndnelnsa ndard lire e eme ed ed .(R eid =R D.realer man 12 Ora nge =Risk b etwee n 6 and lz Green =R,. less lien 6l All Dol ars ar e Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year *3 .0880, 58 3 war 00 0 RewiriMct Idew rn xe ,,,, c, „,,,, ,,, G5 I0C50if *n' NusKr a� - �raa w54 - AmounE -perefo00 '3 -- rr alect )I nm m5d ntm 3920 - )Inc .o naraned - 1424 unt9 rim nodUnconstrained 1931 - nmmin ed - Unconstrain ed 2432 - Uncon strain ed cran ed 2434r - Un un t i Uncon strained 1428, U nsa . t i U nc onst rained 1024- 01n.vn 8 50 u5 , 1431 flm8n=eret n5y ?422 I - YE ARS - Itemi milks Area. Ohon H oe tun - - - - 037377 838 -SSd2,.000 50 7191 4004 - - 5504040, - 50. 3855,433- 54- $&8 2000 - �S2047•d2.d00 : 2/ater System Hiah Prio rity and Goo d Ideas Supply 2008 su Planning and pr mine ryenginee nng for dev elopn.0St. Louis C re ek Enlargem ent and Extensi on Waterdghs far n on yot able PPIy. $ 234,000 2023 new $ 234 .000 k eep $ 234,000 2015 th Surfa ce Wate Tre atment Pla nt (2026 Q uality Te g, Enviro nmen tal Investigati on s, 2022 L and Acquis 008, 12 ,0, r Water St. Lows Cre ek i00r12091 $ 5,618.400 2023 new $ 2,618400 keep S 7,618.400 2008 Siting and de sign of additional water su pply well for Fraser Sys temwell field. $ 22,000 2023 new $ 22000 k eep $ 22000 12 2008 Drilling, 00n5iructi0n antl testing of addin0na1185r supply well. $ 250,000 2023 new $ 250 000 keep $ 250 ,000 2008 Site se lection ,planwng a nd prelimina ry en gineering designo r Fo rest Me adows A ugmeMabon Reserve, (01 Creek) $ 234,000 2023 new $ 234000 keep $ 234,000 2008 Phase 1 -Possible Construction 03 Forest M eadows Augmentation Reserv 42(Elk Creek) $ 1,092.ND 2023 ne w $ 1 092000 keep 5 1092000 2008 Pha se 11 -Po ssible C0n 5WGio n of Fore st M eado ws A ugmen tatio n Re serv oir. (Elk Cre ek) $ 1,092,000 2023 new $ 109,000 keep 5 1,092 003 1006 xcM1anlariri 9an dpre6mniaryrigine enn ytufully augment the Fr ase r Sys te m We ll he ld by dev eloping require d upstream storage fur age antl augmentatlo n. $ 234.000 2023 new $ 234,000 keep $ 234003 Distribu tion Sys tem 2008 Replace dis tribu tion pipeline in s outheast corne r (Elk Cree k Drive t0 O ld V ic to ry Read) of Town to meet fire f12 814iremen t0. $ 623,000 2023 new $ 628000 k eep $ 520000 2008 Additional 500000 gallon Blue Zone 41ora9e Tank to meet maximum day 51us fire flew demand.20 $ 1,092 .000 2023 new $ 1 092000 keep 0 1092900 2008 Planningandpre leminaryenginee ring de sign re qu ired to determine the quantity of additiona l treate d wa ter s tora ge require d fa r po ten tial Blue Zone Tan k expansion. 43,002 2023 new $ 45000 keep $ 47000 2008 22 Replacement distribution system loo p 0etween Eisenhower. HWV40. and Fraser Av enue. $ 150,000 2023 new $ 190 000 k eep $ 190.000 Town North -South System Connection- Co nce ptual Design Pha se forlssue with wa ter right 9/augme nta tlon. $ 40, 000 2023 ne w $ 40 000 keep $ 40.000 TM Byers Avenue Wa terline Improvements 3. 1,520000 2023 new $ 1,720,000 k eep 5 1,220000 TM Waterline Improvements for Furty Critters (Wolverine. Badger, Ermine. Ferret) _ 1,060,000 2023 new $ 1,060 ,000 keep 5 1,060 000 TM Waterline Improv ements for Quail Drive _ 198000 2023 new $ 198000 keep $ 198,000 TM North -South System Exchange _ 3300 00 2023 new $ 330 000 keep $ 330 ,000 28 Wate rline Improveme nts fo r 0111Ave (850LF x$2.350/LP, 5 1,996,000 2023 new $ 1,998,000 keep 5 1,998000 28 Waterline improv ements for Eis enhowe r Dr (600 LF x $2,350/ LP) 5 1,414000 2023 new $ 1,410,003 ke ep 3 1,41 a .000 30 Waterline Improve me nts for Fraser Ave(550 LF x 02350/ LF) 5 1,09[,500 2023 n ew $ 1,202,500 k eep a 1,292.500 Waterline 170800 emenis for Easmm Ave 1465 LF x$2,300LF) 5 1092.000 [023 now $ 1,093,00.0 k nots a 1,093.000 32 Insta ll New North Wate r Tre atment Pla nt Booster Pu mp $ 51,000 2023 ne w $ 61,000 ke ep $ 81 .000 Replace Trans, Pipe that serves the out -,town 11010125 n Byers Peak Ranch. 5 3,200.000 2023 n ew $ 3.300 ,000 k eep 5 3,300.000 30 Red Zone Pump Stab, 1 Valve s and Prying 150 LF 2. steel) 5184,000 $ 55.000 2023 re ,ir $ 184,000 keep $ 184.00.0 Red Zone Pump Station Updates (Pumps, Pressure Gauges, PLC, SCADA end A ntennas) 5 315,000 2023 ne w $ 315, 000 ke ep $ 342 .000 36 .VEP M eter Testing and Re placeme nt (a ss ume 100 re place d per yea r $450 pe r me ter) $ 450. 000 2023 new $ 450,000 keeP $ 450,000 /VEP Le al Prevention and Re placemen t (assu me $100, 000 per yea r for 10 years1 $ 1,0000 00 2023 new $ 1.000,000 keep 5 1,000 .000 /VEP Looping D ead Ende(assume $250000 peryear for years 2025-2028) $ 1,000.000 2023 n ew $ 1. 000, 000 ke ep 5 1,000.000 .Net50051010 del Update s $ 51,300 2023 n ew $ 51,300 keeP $ 51,300 00 15850551802 88 $ 45,000 2023 new $ 45.000 ke eP $ 45,000 Polic y 24E050 0210588,5202802220)42 $ 215, 000 2023 n ew $ 215. 000 ke ep $ 215,000 44 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk G reen: Low Risk D iMe nverWho dhwmjens1118600 Fras er 10- yr Qa Rr System Inven to ry j Aerris t.n ron line d M ala l Wat r System- R151sx 0, 1/202312 05 PM UNCONSTRAINED M ODEL H 1 0 1 P 1 0 1 R s T 9 r, Item` m` 45 Storn o WAV ER F GN G' ro am Cane Nrw roae P aiaM1am Redaaerla ot Gh e�m a3lare 61sk $ utlueMll gr loaat jlmm ��ir a neQ 3923 llnrw notrem ej 34H IV ntrnittamd 2924 a ^2434,ae ^^^4 �n ar a 2422,�•d Unuvn:trernej %434 Umm�. narn ej 2422 llnw lseai nej 3434 ao yw nst f od 3431 ir e ao aarva WS uCrlryAee a pese npClwr wr ' ' 46 5lora ge Tanks -4\ Blue Zone Slorage T ank1 MG Ezl eri or Co atings $ 124.000 24444 $ 124.000 2023 2023 new 8.1 $ 124,000 keep $ 124,000 48 Slo rage Tan ks Blue Zo ne Slorage Tank1 MG Inlerl00 Co alln40 $ 95,000 5 95.000 2023 2023 new 8.1 $ 95,000 k eep $ 95,000 49 Sloage Tanks Blue Zone Slorage Tank1 MG 914114 $ 5,009 5 10.000 2044 2044 new 0.2 $ 10,000 keep $ 10,000 50 Slo rage Tan ks Blue Zo ne Stooge Ta061 MG MecM1anlca1Access antl G afery $ 8,000 0 10 .000 2023 2023 new 10.8 $ 10000 k eep $ 10.880 51 Slorage Tanks Blue Zone St40096 Ta06 MG Tank Ml zers $ 102 ,000 $ 102 .000 2046 2046 new 0.0 $ 102 ,000 keep $ 102 ,000 52 Slora ge Tanks Ve llow Zo ne Slora ge Tank 0. 3 M0 SVuotur 2 $ 184,000 $ 555.000 2045 2045 new 0.4 $ 555000 keep $ 555,000 Slo rage Tan ks V ellow Zone Slor age Tank 0.3 MG 009200r C0 alir4 $ 124,000 $ 124.000 2023 2023 new 8.1 $ 120000 k eep $ 124 ,000 5 Slorage Tanks Vellow ZOna Slorage Tenk 0. 3 MG Inlerlor Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2023 net" 8.1 $ 95000 keep $ 95,000 55 Sto rage Tan ks Vellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Plping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0 .2 $ 10 .000 k eep $ 10,000 50 Storage Tent1 Vellow Zone Storage Tenk 0.3 M0 MecM1enlc41 Acres end0044 $ 8,000 3 10,000 2025 2025 new 04 $ 10000 keep $ 10000 52 Gtore g6 50104 Ve llow Zo ne Stora ge Tenk 0. 3 MG Tan k Mlxers 0 102,000 $ 102,000 2048 2048 new 0.0 $ 102000 keep $ 122,222 6 Sto rage Tan ks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Shuo tu re $ 184 .000 $ 555.009 2045 204 5 new 0.4 $ 555 000 k eep $ 115,000 5 Storaga Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124 ,000 $ 124.009 2023 2023 new 8.1 $ 124 000 keep $ 124 ,000 62 Stora ge Tanks Gre en Zone Sto rage Ta nk 0.5050 Inte rio r 00110 g.s $ 95000 5 95.00D 2023 2023 new 8.1 $ 95.000 keep $ 95,000 6 sto rage Tan ks G reen zone Storage Tank 0. 5 MG PIpl19 $ 5009 5 10.000 2044 2044 net✓ 0.2 $ 10000 k eep $ 10,000 E2 Storaga ranks Green zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG I40 2i0al A 0cess antl safety $ 8 000.. 10,000 2025 2025 new 9.4 9 10,000 keep $ 19 .000 Sto rage Tan ks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Tenk M ixers $ 100000 $ 102000 2046 2046 new 0.0 $ 102000 k eep $ 102,000 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk G reen: Low Risk De nver_Na ririPro e 1196-00 Fraser 10- 0 V,aler System Re pa rADESIG t.en te _MeM 191^ 41 -tine d M ade em - 191 4/13/20219 04 Fd l 0192 Old 00 1.9091.099.59 99 41.9 1.0 59 1S301vo da a dIJ 001 Sam d NOW $91.19 w0000 4070 wu a0 0 )!s12f Mol :uaai e )!s!y Wn!pe :e6ueiQ )Is2i LI6!H :pe 00000 $ 009 1 00000 $ 00 0000 0000 $zoz 0005' s 000'8$ $ soue y 002 ,0 18 OIlels9090 0.9 .60.500 91s0 10 005Z0 00 60 011918 dwnd bo 0004E $ 0001 00006 $ E' 0 meu 600? Ezoz 0009E s 0000 $ se u0919tl P.491049106 9101.16 Ow ed 0a1so o8000 Z 00 0 su011 e1S awed $6 080589 8 0$$$ 000 Gel $ z' 0 7100 260? SESE.000'891 $ D00' E6 $ 10w9ua9 00l9els awed 1915 59e 0997P911 su2Pe9s 0091,0091, c6 000'98 $ 00 01 000'95 $ L0 .105E00 5602 00099 5 000'92 $ 1 0.99.910 . 90 1.11 910 00.0.1.951 115 00. 91 L6 000'00 $ 05541 000 . $ 0' 0 mau 000 0000 000 59 0 000' [6 $ 10m51s9%15101' 0 801899,9 1u1s 0o9A9000 P9110neie Ow,06 D00'00 $ tl 1 000'£6 $ 0'9 mau 0Z0Z FZOZ 000' £.6 $ 00056 $ 0/d 08e1S tlw 00 lalso o0999Z 00 2 0799e tlwnd '� 00056E $ '19 91I 000'209 $ 00 9 409 9902 9602 000990 $ 00065 $ DO H 415 0,92 ,1091$9,20 9 99ZPil 115 Wad PQ 000'61 $ tl 1 000'69 $ 69 7209 9202 56.00060 5 00090 0 .59 090 w.9 815 0912 ,109ggal 999 z6 il 116 d 2d 000'61 $ 0 1 000'69 $ 01 0 109 Ezoz oz.00000 s 00050 $ 806 200 05 0005086200000005 00ZP il 1116 Wad 09 000600 $ 0100 0 000'988 $ LO '5501 9006 sag 90044 $ 000460 $ B09010Pas009 u0n 015dwnd 90.1.1S dLundJ ogooe ouo zP 0 115 Wad GQ 000'960 $ 0001 000'949 $ 09 74010 0006 0600 00091'0 $ 000000 $ dH 9Z£ 40 Wad 92560w nd 1016 009 auo2 Pail su01e16000d 000`9 $ 000 1 000'9 S E9 .09 6000 EZDZ 0009 $ 0009 $ di'9 90000 0010500700 a0soo9 au. P ail 0001996000 d DO 000'0 $ 0001 000'9 ' 0"00606$EZ0Z 0009 $ ODD 9 $ di'056 1111,, .105$. 00 00 1010 009 au.. . 000 0w 1e16n0 Z9 0 000 $ 001 0 0000 $ 69 9 409 6202 EZDZ 0005 6 ODDE $ di$0 la 001.00 010 n0 16000010160 09 au. 600109600000 09 000' 590 $ 000 1 000'S99 $ 96 0009 9606 5606 006990 $ 0005_ $ 0 0/ 00u011n0 0.0011000001 016009 au.P aa $.01915000,0 09 000'895 $ 0001 000'£94 $ Z0 02011 $$06 $006 000$$$ $ 000£50 $ 0ul91 0 0011e150w500010 000 au.Pa a 60011095 Wad60 0052E $ 000 1 0002E $ E9 7400 6606 EZDZ 00006 S 000 a $ 6 00 0 0111 0000 2.1 00606 001910009001s1000 0o0000 9 .W.6 090, B! 000'990 $ 000 1 00059 0 $ 60 7400 $EOZ $_O6 000 500 $ 000 E6 $ 101wau a0 uogwo 0wn,a1soo0 a uoz 0000 59 0119400a, 22 00099 $ 0991 000'99 $ 0'0 1,29 5602 $66? 000'99 0 000'92 $ 100 9 95 0010 1010 0 op 0l66w01 n00 s0 00007090 20 9 s0011 e,40wn0 9 00000 $ 0001 00009 $ 0 '0 0108 '002 3E02 00042 $ 0004E $ 1100m5+a900w9 000 tl plgdwn d1a1s0 og 0002 0009 11 15 dwnd J0 o00'E6 $ 000 1 000'£0 $ 1'6 9039 6505 .00 000'06 $ D0000 $ 000 uop01609911 91,..c.8 .0790°,0 50 0115,60 970 42 000580 8 000 1 000'899 $ 0 '0 ma 5£02 5002 sa0'S90 $ DD0'00 $ 0011 9op0100wn0 L01s0000 0o?u0000 $u 011 GS0wnd s1 000'60 $ 0051 000'69 $ 6 '4 05 5202 5000 000'60 $ DD051 $ _I 1 w 90 0 opeOS 000d191 5o o999. 59 90 0 $01 01010 70.91 Z2 000'60 $ 01000 000'64 $ 94 0.. Ezoz E60Z 00060 0 00050 $ sa 0 ns 0 115 d 1 9 990z us o. e a glas 00990 02 000555 $ 00 01 000655 $ 69 2500 ....6200 000459 $ 000004 $ .0317..0317.sale. wows 19070 uo5a160wnd10100000 002000 0 60018160wnd 00 0002[ $ da aa 000 Z9 $ E9 elau ....6606 00000 6 0006 $ 0960'000070 00y540w n0100009 a uozua00 50n19 e0wnd 65 00000 $ 0001 00069 $ £ '9 1409 EZDZ 0909 00 000 5 000'6 $ 09$0 '0 0.0.0 uo0w90wnd 1a1 s0 00000Z 0990 0 00011014 Wad e$ 000'980 $ 0981 000'889 $ e 'z mau $zoz sag 000'$80 $ 000'26 $ O90/W 011%170 9oPwS tlwnd l5soo00uoz 09200 suo1ns,119$ 000$$$ $ 0001 000'e94 $ Ztl 7100 SSOz SSOz 000'E9b $ 000'680 $ II0m1101s 5u1P11q.0,91In8 910101S 0wnd191sooe azZ 09209 6004405 ,l1991,l1991n 55 SfiS TO E€bZ 7.^R>id 4€Li PD 9le n9 o�9R b€di 809401+090197 SZR bid£ Rdi Falf Sidi �(f bE6i Aau1 oanA FZb£ paul ey euw911 bidi P anewnw91T rvn° 9m A SH 01:1 3sn�m aNm naa wllg ONVi3 N 31U4X $11 9O111$ la 0004 s$ wa9iae ass +Aw 9Q Aa9m 0097 A^ 9!e 90097 PWanPn¢ 1 0 1 $ I o I u w 1 a r 9 a I 3 3 a a 1 e v 12a oW a3NIVaLSNOONf1 UNCONSTRAINED M ODEL o R D 98 Item` Trea tment Pla nts XVAY ER F GN G' uCtlry Aee a ti ro am Coae New roar P aiaM1am el Ch {wa 3tarx 61sk $1 9,19 l Amount ya$01, el.. 1423 Ilnrw notr em ej IV ntrnettamd 2924 ^^^H r ^2424rre m ar e 2422 rr� Unuvn: 0eme.$ Umm�. Oam erj Unw nstmi nej y nw nst i nerj 143i 00 l ir e YE ArtS 34H %424 2422 3434 97 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Building, 20'x 20' $ 90,000 $ 272 MD 2048 2048 new 0.1 $ 272,000 keen $ 222 ,000 58 Treatme nt Plants No rth Water Tre atm ent Plant Storage Sh eds A2) $ 62,000 $ 185.000 2048 2048 new 0 .1 $ 185,000 keep $ 185,000 95 Trea tment Plan ts North Water Treatment Pl ant HV AC F an a nd Heater $ 7,000 5 19.000 2023 2023 new 1 .8 $ 19,000 k eep $ 19,000 100 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Cleanse!! , 20,0 $ 184,000 $ 555.000 2048 2048 new 0.5 $ 555,000 keep 8 55,000 101 102 Treatment Plants North Water -Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges $ 15 ,000 6 19 .000 2023 2023 new 1 .8 $ 19000 keep $ 19000 103 Treatme nt Plants No rth Wate r Trea tme nt Plant 6" Map M eter $ 15,000 $ 19.000 2040 2040 new 6.3 $ 19000 keep $ 19,000 104 Trea tment Plan ts Nohh Water Tre atment Plan t Pump No. 1, 30 HP $ 49,000 $ 61.000 2023 2023 new 6 .3 $ 61 000 k eep $ 61 ,000 195 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 30 HP $ 49,000 $ 61.000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 61000 keep $ 61,000 106 Trea tment Plan ts Nohh Water Tre atment Plan t 6' Gale Va lve w/Valve B ox $ 15,000 5 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 $ 19000 k eep $ 19.000 101 Treatment Plants 400 1 Water Treatm ent Plant Chemical Chlorine Addit,r1 37 ,000 $ 111,000 2041 2041 new 6 .3 $ 111 000 keep $ 111 ,000 102 Treatme nt Plants No . Wate r Trea tme nt Plant Chemic al Soda As h 0401 n $ 31,000 6 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 93000 keep $ 93.000 10 Trea tment Plan ts North Water Tre atment Plan t 00091911000 Trea tme nt $ 31 .000 $ R3.00D 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ k eep $ 93,000 0 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant !Mr DOA, Assembly $ 49 ,000 $ 65 .000 2043 2043 new 9.9 $ 65 000 keep $ 05,000 111 Treatme nt Plants No rth Wate r Trea tme nt Plant Ge ne rator $ 93,000 $ 185.000 2028 2028 new 0 .8 $ 185000 keep 5 180000 2 Trea tment Plan ts 000 Water Tre atment Plan t 6 00 $ 93,000 $ 185.000 2028 2028 new 3.8 $ las000 k eep 5 185 000 113 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant QuIck Dlsoonnect $ 20,000 $ 56000 2028 sue net✓ 3.2 $ 56,000 keep 5 56,000 .x ay eaeXyylk _ _:.1 :..:. . _.r _ •a: ._:.:r : •aa= .� -.._ -� :.:x- .....- :�: 114 115 Treatment Plants No. Water Treatment Plant 000 00 System $ 37000 $ 37 ODD 2032 2032 new 10 .8 $ 37 ,000 keep $ 37000 116 Treatme nt Plants No rth Wate r Trea tme nt Plant pH A nal1zer $ 19 000 6 19000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 19,000 keep $ 19.000 9 . . _ . �. , .. .... :. . .. .. .. _ :...,. = .. w - `= 117 18 Treatment Plants No. Water Treatment Plant Auto T4nier Swit0M1 $ 37 000 $ 74,000 2028 2021 �ii�.... new as $ 74,000 keep 5 74,000 119 Trea tment Plan ts Sou th Water Treatmen t Plant Building, 32'X 223' $ 1 0 $ 333,000 2052 2052 n av 01 $ 333,000 k eep $ 333,000 1 20 Treatment Plants South Water Treatmen t Plant H VAG Fan and Heater 7 000 2 19000 2023 2023 nav 1 .8 $ 19 ,000 keep $ 19,000 121 Treatme nt Plants Su u1M1 Wa ter Tre atment Pla nt 0100001132'x 22 $ 214,000 $ 648 000 2052 2052 new a6 $ 648,000 sees $ 648,000 122 123 Treatment Planes So u111 Wa ter Tre atme nt Pla nt Pres sure g $ 15,000 5 19. 000 2023 03,011.22 $ 19,000 keep $ 19,000 124 Treatme nt Plants So uth Wa ter Tre atment Pla int 0.099 Me ter $ 15,000 $ 19.000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 19000 keep $ 10.000 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk G reen: Low Risk QDe m.ar_Na rthrmems 1t66DDFraser 10- nW y m H.en tm _Herr 1Dnron aime d M ode ern - RI 402/20219 04 PM UNCONSTRAINED M ODEL -o aaaaoaao M 1 Item` ® Trea tment Plants XVAY ER F UN D' WI Ne a Uesc n5tt on Sou1M1 W afar Treatm ent Pb nt Pump N o. 1, 40 HP P° 'rrOAO $ 54,000 5 71,000 p psg Re darsme nt Gh_ [aan 2023 n511 Rr_ 8.1 959 95 ..099 $ 71 ,000 k eep 5J mm� ` 19?l $ 71.000 mn�r.n n in n n on o mn m nosy mo an U mm�: n 00905 ) mm�. n 2; nM n mina mne )mm� � an n amin e m n_ 02 AIL YCSi . 2023 1 Treatment Plants Sou1M1 N'ater Treatment Plant Pump No .2 . 40 HP $ 54,000 5 71 .000 2023 2023 ner✓ 8.1 $ ]1,000 keeP $ 71,000 ---------_ 1 Treatme nt Plants So u1M1 Water Tr eatment Pl ant 6' Gat e Valv e w/ Valve Bar $ 15,000 0 19,000 2023 202 new 1.8 $ 19,000 Deep $ 19,000 ---------_ ® Trea tment Plan ts SoulM1 Water Treatm ent Plant CM1 52 ICbbrine Atltlition $ 3].000 $ 111,000 2041 2041 new 6 .3 $ 111,000 k eep ----------$ 111,000 1 Treatment Plants SoulM1 Water Treatment Plant Cb50 1040 Ash Addition $ 31,000 0 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 93,000 keep $ 93,000---------_ ® Trea tment Plan ts SoulM1 Water Treatmen t Plant 75020ucleitle Tre atm ent $ 31,000 5 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 93,000 k eep $ 93000---------_ 1 Treatment Plants SoulM1 Water Treatment Plant AIr DiRuser Assembly' $ 49 ,000 0 65.000 2023 2023 new 9 .9 $ 65 ,000 keep $ 65000---------_ ® Treatme nt Plants So u1M1 Wa ter Tre atment Pla nt Gen erator $ 93,000 $ 185.000 2032 2032 nefv 0.8 $ 185,000 keep --------- $ 185,000 1 Trea tment Plan ts Sou1M1 Water Treatmen t Plant M CC $ 93,000 $ 165.00D 2032 2032 nev✓ 3 .8 $ 185 ,000 k 55p --------- $ 185 ,000 1 Treatment Plants SDu1M1 Water Treatment Plant puick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2032 2032 nev✓ 3.2 $ 56,000 keep --------- $ 56,000 1Is 02 Ifl Water Treatment Plant SCADA System $ 3]000 $ 30,000 2032 2002 ref✓ 10.8 $7 000 eep $ 3 7000 1 Treatrte nt P151 is So ulM1 Wa ter Tre atrt ent Pla nt pH Analyzer $ 19000 0 19,000 2023 2023 ref✓ 5.3 $ 10,000 keep $ 19000---------_ ®> --a:, .. .. tea ....... .. ... .. . .,... _ ......- a---' 4 ,.. -.- ,_ - - . :`_ 0�_ ®� regiment T Plants SDu1M1 Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer SlvitcM1 $ 37 ,000 5 :4 .000 2032 2032 nefv 0.4 $ 74000 keep --------- $ 7 6000 II ® IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ® - - - - ®__________`$ _ 19,000 ®- - $ 15,000 5 19.00D 2040 2040 0A $ 19000 II Ray.Water Sys r r,51104.2 r r\VeII No.2 M ag M eter $ 15,000 5 19.000 2040 2040 new 0A $ 19,000 eep ---------- $ 19 .000 ® Rz wWa ter Bye Freser WeII N o. 3b Freser WeII No.3b Mag Mete r $ 15,000 5 19,000 ` 2040 2040 0.4 $ 19,000 k eep ---------- 19000 9, - - y. na ®_Rev✓Wa ter Sys Fraser We ll 04.5 �. '.` Fraser Well No.S Mag Meter '9, _ $ 15,000 �� 5 19.ODD 2040 2040 a new 0.4 $19000 keep ---------- $ 19,000 ® v✓ Nat rSys Freser Well Nc. 7 Frase r YVe II N0. 3 M a4112 15, $ 15000 5 19000 2040 2040 ne v✓ 0 .4 $ 19,000 ke ep ---------- $ 19,000 1 Raw Water Sys Frase r Well Nc. B Ek cur We ll NO. B Pump, Pi pi t0. and Fras elcal $ 278,000 $ 0-0,000 2034 2034 ® 1 .0 $ 3] 9000 keeP ---------- $ 370,000 ® Raw Water Sys Fraser Well 54. 9 Fras er Well No. 2 Mag Me ter $ 15,000 5 19,000 2040 2040 nev✓ 0A $ 19,000 k eep ---------- 0 19,000 ® v✓1Vate Frase r Well Nc. 0 Fra se r We ll No. 9 Ma g 11215 , $ 15000 5 19000 2040 2040 ne w 0. 4 $ 19,000 PPp ---------- $ 19 .000 ® v✓Wat y Raw Water Trans misso0 3126 LFa 0055,1, m6')A ge unknown $ 340 000 $ 4„549000 2035 2035 new 1. 0 $ 4,540,000 k eep ----------$ 4,540,000 1 Rz v ✓Wat Raw Weer Transmission ne3126 LF at Fa"lo e')n15 112010-2615 $ 3405000 $ 4,549000 20]0 20]0 new 1.0 $ 4,540, 000 keep ----------$ 4,540,000 ® $ 15,000 $ 19.0DD 2040 2040 ' 0. 4 $ 19000 ®__________ $ 19 000 R W t Sys M Yv W II No .4 44 1,71415We II No 452 4 Me er $ 15,000 $ 19000 2040 2040 new 0A $ 19,000 keep $ 19,000 __ _ t ® Raw Water Sys ` ryv ale We II N0.5 01441 5415 Well52 .01140 M eter $ 15000 g 19 000 2040 2040 0ev ✓ 0A $ 19,000 ke ep ---------- $ 19,000 II.• ' -1" -1 =•-,. - x....T--_ ® Rav ✓Water Sys ®�Rav ✓Water Sys PI Ma ryval:We II N0.7 Ma 2,521, Well$.0Mag Aleter $ 15,000 $ 19.ODD 2040 2040 nev✓ 0. 4 $ 19,000 ke ep ----------$ 19,000 Raw Water Transmiss ion 2976LF zt 5705/LP a" )Age unkno wn $ 3,242,000 $ 4,322.00D 2062 2062 new 1. 0 $ 4,322,000 ke ep ---------- 8 6,322,000 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk G reen: Low Risk 9Da nvar_Nn R6Pme ,1166-00 Fraser 10- yr nal, System bera te _AeM 1Dnran -tine d M ade lWatr3yetem- R1 4/13/20219 04 Ph1 UNCONSTRAINED M ODEL -o aaaaoaao M 1 Item` ® W3300Ds t Sv WAV ER F UN D' UGIINATe a Uesc n3tt on wo air 905 p9psg Redarsme nt Gh_ [tan Rr_ @\1+314S48i tJmm n 9= ` n in n mn�t.n mn m n on o nosy nn erne n ern r .rn an d Unman Z92& ) mm�. n! Lantana.)mmna r nMan aa an m n_•rva n an. AIL xeei ® 1N01st Sys & PRVs Potable Transmission Transmission Line (>t2")Ag e unkn own n LF at 5102/LF $ 5,329,000 0 ],505.000 2035 2035 new 1.0 $ 5.505,000 Deep $ ],505,000 1 1N01st Sys & PRVs Potable DisVibuti on U =t3') A4 0 unk nw 10]3a LF at $]05;LF $ 129320 ,000 5 1T24"6000 2005 2035 new 0.3 $ 1]2.426000 Deep $ 1]2,4]8 ,000 ® 1N Dis t Sys & 551= A BA ND ONED sure Relief at Wapiti - Vauh Str ucture $ 4],000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 $ 93000 k eep $ 93000 1 15 0S007001 PRV 2 6 Pressure Re l of at Elk Rancr Vauh Str0 ure 4] 000 $ 93 000 2 45 2045 $ 9 000 000 $ 93 000 ® 1N D at Sys & P04 0 Rd d 3 6 P 0 000 a 010 a Oltl Vault Str00 070 $ 4],000 00 2045 2045 new 6 .3 $ 93 ,000 k eep $ 93,000 -'-'16,-- ''`'- '- .'a-. .-,\- -'-' ,'-'----- . -— '- ‘,.'7-7,------ - ® W Dlst Sys & PRVs Pressure Relief at Oltl Victory Rd South Vault Structu re $ 4],000 $ 00,000 2 2 6.3 $ 93,000 $ 00 ®S PRV 5- 5l Pre ss re 50(0 at 200o v0 ry EMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMMICIIIIMMIIIMMEMIllilll ® 1N Dist Sys & PRVs PR V 6-5 Pressure Relief at Pioneer (G r v400 structu re $ 4] 000 $ 93000 2045 245100 .4$0000000p $ 93,000 ® 1N D st Sys & PRVs (R od/Gre an) 1 f et Pia k 01 atu re $�47 000 $ 93ODD 2045 2045 $ 93,000 eep ---------- $ 93,000 -',Z:-,,-9 . \ 'sss' -sss'-'- sss'''‘'Ns •=---s's._. - - - - "- -- -- - \'-- .- -- Ili,,,,s-s.- . 's- s's -...- - .- 7 .= ''A ---- "s '.. . - - - •- ''' .s... ® Notes: ® Sourceof la m. 2 1 ate r5 pp 100 0007Plan(emv✓ a nd Caldwell).T = ca1M em0rantlum5ummaryel C apta1N00-e"0,006roj0 4t for202S et_---_—___________ GyNe (Me rrck. Aug0u 5t 4 2022), \VEP W ynPlan (Me c es )� 2015=ras er Fumin g SNtly (JRS. 2015 1- _-■■--__________- Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk G reen: Low Risk DPe nver_Ne dkPme 1100-00 Fraser 10- yr nal, System byen to ry_Merrich Un Pan line d M ade lwarr3,=tem- RI 4/13, 0219 04 PM CONSTRAINED MODEL I e 1 c 1 p IE I F I c I H I I I RI 6 2 Da te: 9/21/2023 Dv: TPS triode Co nstrained mo del,(C al=Risk greater tha n t_ Orang e = w sk b etl reen 6 and 1,2 Gr een -ilsk less th an 6l I M I ^' I 0 I P I Q R I 3I T I u y I yi All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Y ear 3o nr tie aW455R AMID.AMID.s Made Are a Ge soribti a0 ' New Cast Databa se' = RenlaaPmoGt - Year '¢1ia Eud oe151 ar1 ' YCat Re pair or ' `' ' Sad aeted :DOS. Co nstrained Constrained- '- Co nstrai ned aaos Censlrai ned- '' Constrain ed Constr ained. Zia Const rain ed 2424 ' Co nstr ained. 2214 .. Constrained- ' Constrained 2412 9.ILr. W4oaa Item° 5 ReoaCast, N awz pm ouni ' :. soarooi' 2921, 2924 soar 2422 s000, ' 200 0000 00- $ .1,95,000 $ '0405,000 $ ' 4133:400 =0 '4656004 i -5005000 =S ,1 ,644,000.$ 0 ,121,040'$, 0,&M,050, F 215,095,050 Water Svstem High Priority and Good bear Supply 2008 Pla nning a nd pre liminary engineering for dev elo ping St. Louis C ree k Enlargem ent and Ext ension W ater rights f or n on -pot abl e u p,. $ 234.000 2026 new $ 234,000 keep $ 234,400 201 5 Surtac e Wate r Tre atmen t Plant (2026 Water 0ua liy Testing, Env iron menta l Investigations, 2021 L and Acquisitio n, 2031 Construed , St. Louis Creek keep $ 2(10000 5 (142600 5 676 000 2008 Siting and design of a dditional wa ter supply well fo r Fra se r Syste m well fie ld. $ .0000 2024 new $ 22000 k eep $ 22000 2008 -12 odllln g_ eonatruc ion and testing of a daiti0nal wa ter Su5pl2 well. $ 250.000 2024 nee $ 250,000 keep $ 250.000 13 2008 SIR s election. pla ning, a nd 20 1001950F01065 00400 0000 70 050 00001.)o n Reserv0i1.(Ek0re ek) $ 234000 2025 ne w $ 234,000 L eep 5 234000 2008 Phase I -Possible Con struc tion of Forest M eadows A ugmen tatio n Reservoir. (Elk Creek) $ 1 092 000 2028 new $ 1002,000 keeP $ 1,092,000 IS 0008 Phase II -Possible Con... of Forest Me adows Augme ntatio n Re se rvo ir. (Elk Cree k) $ 1.002 .000 2030 0 00 $ 1.092,000 k eep $ 1,092,000 2008 Plan nin g and prelimin ary en gin ee ring lo fu lly au gment vi e Fraser Syste m We ll Oe ld by deve lopin g requ ire d upstrea m storage for exchange and augrtlentatlon. $ 234000 2032 haw $ p $ 234000 18 GistrMution System 2008 Replace distributio n pipe line in so utheast corne r (Elk C re ek Driv e to O ld Victo ry Road) of To wn to mea l fire flow re quire me nts. $ 828 000 2025 new $ 625.000 k eeP S 323 030 2008 Additional 500000 ga llon Blue Zone StorageTank tomeel maximum da y plu s ere flew dema nd. $ 1 .00 2000 2026 new $ 1 .03 2000 keep $ 1 092,000 2008 Plannm ganapmll10190nglneetlr9dssign required to determine the quantity of additional treated w ater siorage0qui100 for pote ntial Blue Zone Tank expans ion. $ 41000 2024 hen $ 41,000 p $ 4105,0 2008 Replaceme nt dis tribution sys te m loo p betwe en Eisenho wer, HW040, a nd Fras er Avenu e. $ 190,000 2030 new $ 190.000 keep $ 190.000 Town Norm - So uth System Connec tion - Conce ptual Design Phase for lss u00 77 water rights/augme ntation. 5 40. 000 2024 new $ 40000 keep $ 40.00 TM Byer, Avenue Waterline Improv ements $ 1720000 2023 hen $ 1 720.000 ke ep $ 1 ,720000 001010 100010 00 51010 011066'10 rsWolve rine , Badger Ermine, Fe rret) 0 1.060. 000 2024 new $ 1.060,000 keep $ 1,060.000 TM W aterline Improvements,. Quail Drive $ 193000 2025 new $ 108 ,000 ke ep 5 190000 TM 37 No rth Soul 1 m .o llan ge $ 3300 00 2025 new $ 330000 keeP S 330000 28 Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave (850 LFx $2,350/ LF) S 10 00.000 2027 new $ 1.998,000 keep 5 1,008 000 20 W aterline Improv ements for Eise nhower Dr (600 LF x 52.350/LF) 5 1410000 2029 new $ 1 410,000 k eep 5 1 410 000 30 ,la10 ne Impr 10 0e nls fo r Frase r Ave(550LF x$2350/ LF) S 1. 292 500 2032 new $ 1.202,500 kee0 $ 1 ,202,500 W aterline Improv ements for Ca stor, .0 (465 LF x $2,350/ LF) 5 109.000 2033 new $ 1093,000 L eep $ 1,093,000 Install New No rth Water Treatment Plant Bo oster Pump S 61,000 2 024 ne w $ 61000 ke ep $ 01,000 Replace Trans . Pipe that se rve s the ou t-of-town ho me s in Bye rs Peak Ra nc h. S 8.900. 000 2031 new $ 3.300.000 Veep 3 3,300.000 34 Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Plping (50 LF 2.' steal) $104,000 $ 555000 2024 re pair $ 134, 000 Ve ep $ 184 ,000 Re a Zone Pu mp Sta tio n Upda tes p Pressu re Gauges, PLC SCA DA en d A ntenna s) S 316,000 2030 new $ 316.000 keep $ 316.000 YEP Meter Testing and Replacement (assume 100replaced per -year 400 per maser)38. $ 45,000 $ 43.000 S 45,000 0 45.000 5 45 ,000 0 45.000 5 45,000 $ 45.000 5 45.000 0 45.000 ( 37 vEP Leak Prevention an d Replacement 0100000 pe r year for 10 years) 10900 $ 0 0 106 ggo 5 0 md0g $ 100000 1no o0 E 0 0 100000 s 100000 0 1 oo ago 5 100000 1g6 ggg 0 , WEP LoopingDead Ends assume $250000 per year for year, 2028-2029)38 2023 new $ - keep $ 25.000 5 250,000 $ 250,000 S 250,000 W ater Sys tem M odel updates 5 51300 2023 new $ 51,300 keep $51300 40 .later Efficie ncy Plan 5 45000 2028 new $ 45. 000 Bap $ 45,000 Po licy 006P010 60 0000 0222000 2023 new $ - ke ep $ 90,000 $ 125,000 44 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk Green: Low Risk 4/21,02 712. 08 FM lore CONSTRAINED MODEL A l R 1 1 D E 1 ! 1 R l t K M l l o P 1 o 1 B 1 5 1 u l Da te'. 4/13/2023 2 Bs MPS Des .. Co ntained mo del,(1.0 4 12.9resPr Ma n 12 Orang e = Rah n eG een 6. 13, Gr een =Risk kss th an ei 4 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Y ear Me ad 900070t FUN D 0 00ip.Area0000 A uoe - �vaiT Gast, New Gast, DaCaba se - J2e vlacemeD4� 4 0ar' Cla n Rewvm Re va k - RI3k r ,_ye1W . rd, 0 010 205050 Di- r u nshorn ea ' Cat- c 0 0200410 Co nstrained , Lb naM1er T Co nst rai n. , , sa i ea in s oea 004(001 n010 400 cn an Co nee 00100 Co nstrained ue. ea Constr ain. , - 0 0000r0 co . ea ns 00in &U F yLL R. 1 - lemt s - er Baa ., r i4N rt Stoma. Tan ks 0006502 $ 3; .4IA Oa 5 5,10111040 * 455 2,560 $ 4405,400 =6 '165tV00 1 ,005,000 =6 808 0004 _0 ta2t3�aD =5 0,03] ,500 $ 211,005 ,200 45 4] Storage anks Blue Zone Sto rage Tank 1 MG Exterior C oatings $ 124000 5 124000 2023 2033 hen .1 $ 124.000 k eep $ 124,000 4e 6lo rage Tanks Blue Zone Stora ge Tan k 1 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 S 05.000 2023 2033 new .1 $ 95,000 keep $ 95,000 4 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank l NIG Piping 5000a 10000 2044 2044 new 0.2 $ 10000 k eep S 10000 5o Sto rage Tan ks Blue Z on e Stora ge Tank 1 MG M echanical Access a nd Salary $ 8,000 10000 2023 2033 new 100 $ 10.000 keeP $ 19,000 Storage Tanks Blue Z one Storage Tank 1 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,0]0 n 102 .000 2046 2046 ne w 0.0 $ 102,000 keep 5 102,000 Sc 51 y Tan ks Me llow Zo ne Storage Tan k 0.3 MG Struc ture $ 186000 5 555 000 2045 2045 new 0 .4 $ 555 000 ke ep $ 555,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 M0 Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 S 124,000 2023 2033 new 0.1 $ 124,000 keep $ 124,000 54 4 Stora ge Tan ks Ye llow Zo ne Sto rage Tan k 0.3 MG Inteno r c oa tin gs $ 95,000 5 05.000 2023 2035 new 5 .1 $ 95 ,000 p 0 05,220 1 Sto rage anks Yellow Zone Stora ge Tank 0.3 MG Piping 5003 5 10000 2044 2044 new o._ $ 10,000 k eep 5 10,000 fib Storage Tanks Yello w Zon e Storage Ta nk 0.3 MG M echanical A cce ss and Safety $ 8,000 S MON 2025 2033 new 8 .4 $ 10 .000 Veep 10,000 T 51 y anks Yellow Zone Stoage Tank 0.3 MG Ta nk Misers $ 5 109000 2046 2046 new 0P $ 102000 p $ 102,000 58 Sto rage Tan ks Green Zone Storage Tan k 01 MG Structure $ 184,000 S 555 000 2045 2045 new 0 .4 $ 555.000 404 $ 555,000 9 Storage Tanks Green Zone Stora ge Tank 0.5 MG 540141 Co.. $ 124,000 S 124.000 2023 2033 new .1 $ 124,000 keep $ 124,000 v0 Stora ge Tan ks Gre en Zone Stora ge an k 0.5 MG Ir., C oGin gs $ 95,010 5 95000 2024 2033 hen .1 $ 95,000 ke ep $ 45,000 a Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Piping $ 5,000 S 10.000 2044 2044 new 0.2 $ 10.000 keep 5 10,000 a Storage Tanks Green Zo ne Sto rage Tank 0. 5 MG M ec ha nical AC eees e nd Safe ly $ 0 0 10000 2025 2033 new 6 .4 $ 10000 .000 10,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Tank Misers $ 102,000 3 1020 00 2046 2046 new 0.0 $ 102000 keeP $ 102,000 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk Green: Low Risk G. PeneerJO 6wmter tM118a00Fear 0 wa ta remCIPRe powESlcmnn et lnentnremMeM„Co nn tainlOde lwate r9yalem-1316. 4/142 0239 55 AM CONSTRAINED MODEL A l e 1 C 1 D 1E l r I G1 H l t K M I R 1 o 1 P 1 0 1 R 1 B1 T1 t, l Da te'. 4/13/2023 Des .. Co ntained mo del,(1.0 61210 greater tha n 12 Cam e=Ri sk S eamen 6 and tL Gr een =Risk bss th en ei 4 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Y ear 60082 of WATER FUN D 1ltili yArea Qesc A tiau Rem.. - New Gast, Oaeaba se J2Y vlacema94, 0 880. Cla n 1Bua amsert }4e R_k y Na or9rN 0 014 24l5e®. c u nshorn as c 8428028 Co nst rai n. ,rwGare sa ea s aau1 8833802 ca nshain ad 82384 co aaa ca nstrain ea 3302010 Constr ain. , ns Harn ca 2012 as - 591 1�L R$ 1 I., s - Yom[ il€Ye2 i4N 2824 s 2222ea 24Z 2222'342$ 29822 . 2022 . _ Puree Station s - - .. e$, 2,003 ,008_ �$ 3;4tA 03 , S i ,505o303 S 4,154.800 $ 4,00,48 =3 '18011000 1 ,006,000 =$, 783,984. 0 ta2t3�A0 =5 8437 ,508 $ 389,889 ,993 Pomp Sta tlo ns Gree n Zone Bo oster Pump Staten Bulgi ng . ,11, 1 81 7,1 ell $ 153,000 9 463.000 2055 233 new 02 $ 46 3,000 keep S 453,000 Pu mp Sta tlo ns G ree n Zone Bo oster Pu mp 51el1o1 4801,1g HV AC $ 62000 9 185.000 2025 2033 hen 28 $ 185,000 keep S 185,000 68 Pu mp Sta tio ns Gree n Zone Bo os ter Pu mp Station Pump GM15 HP $ 9000 5 1203 2023 2033 new 5 .3 $ 12,000 keep S 12,000 P p Stations Gre en Zone Booster Pu mp Sta tion P pG2,15 HP 6000 5 12000 2023 2033 new 63 $ 12000 ke ep $ 12,007 70 Pu mp Station s Gre en Zone 8331Boos. Pu mp Sta tion P p Station Valvesa nd Piping $ 417.0 n 5 55000 2023 2033 new 6 .3 $ 555 ,000 ke ep 555,000 71 Pump Statlons Green Zone Bo os ter Pump Sh iloh Pressure Gau ge s $ 15,000 S 10 000 2023 2033 new 1 .8 $ 10.000 keeP 5 19000 72 Pump Sta tio ns Gree n Zone Bo os ter Pump 510tlo1 8 00 4Me ter $ 16,000 3 10.070 2025 2033 new 4 .0 $ 18000 Veep 3 19,000 Rm... Green Zo ne Boo ster Pump Slaeon MCC $ 03,000 0 165 .000 2035 2035 new 1 .0 $ 185 .000 V eep 5 103000 Pump Stations Green Zo ne 000 ster Pump Station PLC $ 93,000 S .03 .000 2023 2033 new 8 .1 $ 90000 V eep $ 93,000 PurrpStations Green Zo ne Boo s. P p Station A uto ...Switch $ 37,090 s 74 000 23s 2035 new 0 .1 $ 74000 k eep $ 74,000 75 Pump Stations G reen Zo ne Boo ster P p Station Mick Disconnec t $28,060 5 58707 2035 2035 new 0 .1 $ 56,007 s ees $ Kam 77 Pump5tatlons Green Zone Booster P1mp5labon Generator $ 93,090 S 115000 2035 2035 new 0.2 $ 185.000 keeP S 185,000 3 Pump Statlons Green Zone Booster Pump5latlo8 SCADA and A ntennas $ 37,000 S 310 00 2023 2033 new 6, $ 37.000 804 5 37,007 9 Pump8tatlons lied Zone Bo43016ump Station Be lting $ 153,000 9 463.000 2055 2055 new 0.2 $ 46 3,000 keep S 453 ,000 80 P p St.ons Re d Zone ...Pump Station Building HVA5 $02,000 5 185000 2025 2033 hen 2, $ 185.000 ke ep $ 165,007 a1 Pump Stations Red Zone Booste1 Pump Station Pump 0 1, 15 HP $ 3,000 S 4, 000 2023 2033 new 6, $ 4,000 keep $ 4 ,000 s Pu mp Sta tio ns Retl Zo ne Booster Pump Station Pump R2. 70 HP $ 6,000 0.000 2023 2033 new 62 $ 8,000 keep S 8,000 89 Punnp Stations Red Zone Boo ste rPump Sta tio n Pump R3 7.5 HP 8,0005 0 707 2023 2033 new 6.3 8,000 k eep S8,000 4 Pump5ta tlo ns Red Zo ne Booster Pu mp Station Pu re. I. 326 HP $ 111,000 S 1413.000 2023 2033 new 8 .1 $ 148,000 keep $ 148,000 e lett.S.ons Red Zone Boo ste rR ump Sta tio n P p Sta tio n V alves and Piping $ 186000 5 5550 00 2045 2045 new 0.1 $ 555000 L eep S 555,000 Pump Stations Re0 Zon e Boos..0 815tatlon Pressure Gau ges $ 15,000 3 19 000 2023 2033 n ew 1.8 $ 10.000 keeP S 19,000EE Pump Staeon8 Red Zone Boo ste r Pump Sta tio n n M eg Meter $ 15000 6 10. 000 2023 2033 new u2 $ 19,000 V eep 3 14,008 88 P p Station s Re d Zone 78886484014,80 0C 6 5 105000 2035 235 ne w 1. 0 $ 185,000 Ve ep 5 185,907 as Pump Statlons Red Zone Boo ster Pump Sta tio n PLC $ 93,000 S 03.000 2023 2033 new 8.1 $ 93.000 8ee0 5 00 ,000 Fu 045ta eo ns R ed Zo ne Booster Pump Station A uto Tran sfer Swrte4 37000 1 74 000 2035 2035 new 0. 1 $ 74, 000 keep S 74,000 Pump Statlons Red Zone Booster ....on Quick Disconnect $ 28000 S 56000 2035 2035 new 0.1 $ 56000 eep $ 58,000 Pump stems 5 00 Zo ne Booster Pu mp Station G en era to r $ 92,000 S 185.000 2035 2035 new 0.2 $ 185000 ke80 5 185,000 Pump5ta tlo ns Red Zo ne Booster Pu mp Station SCA PA and An ten na s $ 3],000 9 3,.000 2023 2033 new 62 0 37.000 8000 5 37,000 94 Pu mp Sta tio ns Red Zo ne Boaster Pump Station Hydrostatic Stora ge Tan ks $ 56,000 0 74.070 2025 2033 hen 7.7 $ 74000 keep S 74,000 CaDonvo.o rte rojer tA116a00Fro m 0 wa ta tamCIPRa anwESIGN s ot lnontor.. „Co nrtminlnde lweta r9,alem-R,x 0142 0239 55AM CONSTRAINED MODEL A I B 1 c 1 D 1E 1 r 1M 1H l / e1 t 1m I N l o 1 P 1 o 1 R 1 91 T 1 u l Da te'. 4/13/2023 sc .. Co ntained mo or„ 4 =1201greaAr tha n 12 Dan a= Ri sk n en veen 6 anolL Gr een =Risk kss m ane, All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Y ear §nnMe of WATER FUN D Utilip.Area Desc A tiae �vaiT Gast, New Gast, Dahaba sa - Ne vtacemeaE 2 070' Gl a Re vava r - RI3k - ,_y_ - N 0 712 22lFe®. ', P � D ea u nshorn Co nstrained c ea- Lb nsher T .aa- sa ea in s ne,t 5000121 cn an nsi lan ca nes 5000 nstrain ca eel Constr ain. 0 0520r4 ca eel ns hain &U F UM/ 1 - molt 5 -71.., art Yatc t : - Treatment Plants 2,0115,500$1$ 3; .41A 05 0 5 ,9353530 S 0,154,500' $ 4,437,400 =7 '1771000' 5 ,401,500 =$, 888004. 54 ta254,000 =5 1,027 ,500 $ 20$989 ,004 9C 9 Tre atmen t Plante North Water Trea tment Plant 6 u15Ti n 20' x20' $ 90,000 S 212.000 2048 2048 new 0 .1 $ 272,000 keep $ 273,000 98 Treatment Plants North Wa ter Treatment Pla nt St orage heasf2) $62000 5 105000 2042 2048 new 0.1 $ 185.000 k eep $ , 99 Tre atmen t Plant6 North Water Trea tment Plant HVAC Fen a nd H eater $ 7,000 S 10.000 2023 2033 new 1, $ 19,000 keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Cleanmel120'20' $184,000 5 555000 2048 2048 new 0.5 $ 556,000 k eep S 555,000 1.8 $ 10,000 2 Treatment Plante North Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 S 10 .000 2023 2033 ne w keep $ 19,000 3 Tren tment Pla nts No rth Wate r Tre atmen t Plant 6 8 MAe r $15,000 5 19000 2023 2033 new 6 .3 $ 19.000 Fe e0 $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Puma No. 1,30 HP $ 46,000 S 61.002 2223 2033 new 6.3 $ 61,000 keep 5 61,000 0 Trea tment Pla nts No rth Wate r Tre atmen t Plant 0217252.4007 $ 46,000 0 61.000 2023 2033 new 6 .3 S 31 ,000 ke ep 9 61,000 6 Treatment Plants North Wa ter Treatment Pla nt e Gate V alve w/Va lve Box $ 5 19000 2023 2033 new 1.8 $ 19,000 p 5 19,000 Tre atmen t Plants North Water Trea tment Plant Chemical Chbnne A dditio n $ 37,000 S 111.000 2023 2033 new 6 .3 $ 111 .000 re00AP 5 111,000 e Treatment Plants North Wa ter Treatment Pla nt Che mica l Soda Ash A dditio n $31000 5 93000 2023 2033 new 6.3 $ 9„000 2.0 $ 08,000 S Treatme nt Plants North Water Trea tmen t Plant Ra0lonuckl02 Trea tmen t $ 31,000 S 93 000 2023 2033 new 8 .3 $ 93.000 0,00 $ 93,000 0 Tre0tm0nt Plants North Water Treatment Plant A ir Diffuser A ssembly $ 49,000 S 65.000 2023 2033 new 8.9 $ 65.000 ke53 $ 55,000 Trea tment Pla nts No rth Wate r Tre atmen t Plant Ge ne rator $93000 5 155000 2028 2033 new 0.8 $ 185 000 Ve ep111 $ 185,000 2 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant MCC $ 93,000 S 106. 00D 2028 2033 new 3.8 $ 185.000 keep 5 185,000 Treatment Plants North Wa ter Treatment Pla nt Gu icp Disconnect $ EE,aao 5 5E 000 2028 2033 new 32 $ 56 ,000 k eep113 S 56,000 6-.. - s 5 Tre atmen t Plants North Water Trea tment Plant 5202 Sys tem $ 3,,000 S 37.000 2023 2033 new 10.8 $ 37,000 I� keep $ 37,000 Treatment Plants North Wa ter Treatment Pla nt pH A na ly ze r $19000 5 19000 2023 2033 new 6.3 $ 19.000 k eep $ 19,000 6 1188 383 Plants North We ler Treatmmenl Pla nt Aule Tmneler Switch $ 37,000 S 04. 000 2028 2033 new 0.4 S 74,000 k eep $ 74,000 116 Treatmen t Plants Sou th Water Trea tment Pla nt Bu ildin g 320 226 $11,000 5 300000 2048 2040 new 0.1 $ 333,000 0020 $333,000 20 Treatment Plants South Wate r Tre atme nt Plant HVAC Fan and He ate r $ 7,000 S 19. 000 2023 2033 new 1, $ 19,000 k eep $ 19,000 Tre atmen t Plants Sou th Water Trea tment Pla nt C201222 2.ell 3220 $214,000 3 648005 2042 2042 new 0.6 $ 048 .000 Ye20121 $ 648,007 122 as O Tre atment Plan s .�a��. Sou th Water Trea tment Pla nt Pressure G au ges e_ $ 15,000 �,, S 19.000 : 2023 2033 new 12 0 19.000 reap 5 19,006 2a Trentment Plants South Wate r Tre atmen t Plan t 6 4 Meter $1,000 0 19000 2023 2033 new 5. 3 $ 19,000 keep $ 19,000 Tre atmen t Plants Sou th Water Trea tment Pla nt Pu mp No.1. 40 HP $ 54,000 S 71.000 2023 2033 new 8.1 $ 71.000 ke00125 5 71,000 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk Green: Low Risk D. 0/anva.o .Pmin6 t,11.60Frans 0 Wa ta mG IPRe ,o„ DE9IGNwnn et lnent6rAMent „Co nrtmtn lode lWate r9,alam-Rlx6x A142 0239 55 AM 4,6 CONSTRAINED MODEL --- as®aoaao MN Da te'. 4,1312023 ®0rTPS 18 07!Co nstra ined mo d78, 70 770 889162078,(Re d =126k greater Ma n 12 nt m ane, All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Y ear : 119m1. 0 01 ..44 1:10se 8a Revair Last M ew Gat nt v 90r' Bvtlaei S� t Yaar Risk [futl netetl, 9039V9i. Gu n netl w etl C etl a can . Gnn n etl Gun ned . Gu n netl Gw eel Go n ed UL R. 20020 detl 00280netl ®- - ® - Treatment Plants - South Water Treatment Plant - Put, No.% 40 HP - $ 54,000 - S 71 000 2023 - 2033 - new - -- -- .1 - - $ ]1.000 k eep 1$. 4003807.O$ 3: .479 83:8 1 ,933.11945 21§4.390 S i4,136,409 i3. 0 5 7,037 ,7 03 $ 245.895 ,093 $ 71 ,000 ® Tre atmen t Plants Sou th Water Trea tment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ VANe Box a $ 15,000 3 19.000 2023 2033 new 1 .8 $ 19 .000 keep s 19,000 ® Treatment Plants South Wate r Teatme nt Plant Ch emical Chlorin e Atldlllon $ 97 000 5 000 111 2023 2033 n57 53 $ 111000 ee kp $ 111,001 ® Tre atmen t Plants Sou th Water Trea tment Pla nt Chemical Soda A sh Addition $ 31,090 5 93.000 2023 2033 new 5 .3 $ 93,000 keep 5 93,000 ® Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Ra0ionuclei27 Treatment $ 31090 5 9 000 2023 033 $ 93000 Aeep s 93,000 1 Tre atme nt Plants Sou th Water Trea tmen t Plan t Air Diffuser Assembly 9 000 S 65000 2023 033 9 .9 $ 6 5000 keep $ 65,000 1 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Generator $ 93090 S 18 5000 2028 033 ® 0.8 $ 185,000 p 5 185,000 ® Trea tment Pla nts So uth Wa ter Tre atmen t Plan t M CC $ 93000 5 1 000 85 028 23 203 new 3 .8 1 000 $ 85 k e ep § 185,000 ® Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect $ 28,090 S 55.000 2026 2033 new ® $ 56,000 keep 0 56,000 ,,_„*,_,=,,---9772. 3 �� L�000 ® ®� Treatment Plants South Wate r Tre atme nt Plant e SCADS Sysim $ 3]090 5 3 ]000 2023 2033 new 10.8 $ 3],000 ee b ee p 5 3],000 Tre atmen t Plants sou th Water Trea tment Pla nt pH A nalyzer $ 19,000 S 15.0DD 2023 2033 new ® $ 19 .000 Veep 5 1%000 S ]4 000 2028 2033 ®�Tre a me n Pans t t t Sou %M1 Water Trea tmen t Plan t Au to Transfer Switc h $ 3],090 0.4 $ ]4 000 k $ $ 74,000 III ® ®- ____--____________- II Fras er We ll No1 ::: Pe w Wa ter Sys Well 1 $ 1500 0 5 1 40 2040 new 04 0 19000 ke eP $ 19,000 Sys Fra se r Well No.2 Frase r Well No .2 M ag Mete r $ 15,000 S 100 00 2040 2040 new o9, $ 19 .000 8873 $ ✓9,000 ®Ra w208te r 31 ® Re Fra se r Well No. 38 Well No. 30 M eg Rte $ 15,000 S 19.000 211 1 40 04 new 0 .4 $ 19,000 Aeep s 19,000 ® Y.. ., ,..� rri-e $ 1s IMOSIMI:MMEMEINESEIMIMINEM 7 $ 19,009 . -s- Fra ser We ll No.7 Mao Me ter $ 15,000 S 10. 000 2040 2040 ® 0.4 ® Raw Wate r Sys Fraser W ell N0. 7 $ 10,000 k ee0 s 19,000 ® Ra r2]8 uN ate Sys Fra ser We ll Fraser Well 08. 8027 7 Piping,4,0 Ekrerral $ 000 5 3]0 000 2034 2034 ® i. 0 0 3]0,000 k e ep s 370000 ® Raw Water Sys Fras. Fraser W111517. 8 o Well No. 887 0747 7/ Frase r $ 15000 5 190 00 2040 2040 new 0.4 $ 19000 Veep $ 19,000 _ ® $ 16,000 ®®®®® $ 9.000 ® S 19,000 ®Pe w Wa ter SysRarr`Arater Trans miss io n 3125aLFt $105/LFQ 8)Agc unhn0,vn $ 3495000 5 45 400 00 2035 2035 ne w 1. 0 $ 4540000 keep S 4,540,009 ® Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission T rano sminn.Aa,4't0 atmsta12010-201e at $7&5/LF F No. $ 3,495,000 S 4.540.000 21110 2070 new 1.0 $ 4.540,000 keep 5 4,549 ,000 s ®M 0 ,yoolo2 M aryrale Well No.1 M atyvale We II No.1 M ag M eter $ 15,000 S 19.000 2040 2040 ® OA $ 10.000 keep 5 19,000 r S 19. 000 2040 2040 ® Re Water M at49 1e Well No. 4 ter M aryva le Wel180. Ma u Me $ 1a, 000 0w 0.4 $ 19,000 ke ep $ 19,006 ®RawWate Water Sys Ma ry.. Well No.6 klaryvele We n 0 08113.73890 5r $ 15000 5 9 000 2040 2040 new OA $ 19000 keep $ 19 ,000 ® -.. .nom. __ -_ ® yt ate r Sys 71016. 7M e,. 7 Alertrua le Well 80. 780 M eter $ 15,000 S 19 000 2040 2040 n ow Od $ 19. 000 e ep $ 1%000 1111 lillaINIMIIIIIIM 4. Wa ter Sys P. Wear Tran smis ao n o7eL, ,,,,t,(11 Age unknown000 5 4922 000 0035 2045 ne w $ 4322000 ee 4,322,000 -_-_--__----------- Green: Low Risk Q. Pen✓er,S, Pmtematn5H00Faeer,0 Wa te mc wRe powESION oeetlnentnoeM „Go artminlnde lWate r9yatem-R1xx 4/14/20239 55AM CONSTRAINED MODEL --- as®aoaao MN oa te'. 4/1.027 ® Bv TPS ElDeaon peo Co nstra ined mo ded (Pe d = Rish .1.127.. .4 ..0 ..41413.7,skk m ane, All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Y ear 1taral w,ttr4e r U UIiAaeo00os20 h4e RkaaiT Gost New Ga t ., ..,„..,,,,,,.°1 �� -13atl nei Staft Y>�[ = RI3k 9D1 JIDi= net, c o nward ww,am 0101 0101 v 14 012 00 ea saes v0040 cn 62400 ad 015,01 soaea co as D ea s ea wrso- am as�b . cv iP12 ea 0109 1 /ELM i4N iV24 .,_ 24Z 342$ ZDi9. ®. .. 111 Wa ter D,s t Svs B PRVs .. S. 2000 ,300 -$ 2diA 00 0 7 ,93vT,000 S 2/$4.300- S 4,436,400 S. 0001/000 7 .605.000 r$, 000,00. S 70,Et5aAa 5 'A47 ,000 S 445.099 ,.000 ® VV Dist Sys &PRVs Potable Transmission Trana77smissi on Line mLF at$102 NLF x')Age unkn ow n $ 5,029,000 5 ] .505.000 2035 2035 new 1 .0 $ 1.505,000 Deep $ 7,505,000 ® \v DislSys e PRVs Potable Dislribulion DAmbuti on Line 11030 LF at$7o yLF'Age unknown $ /29320000 $ 172 .426.000 2035 2035 new 0 .3 $/72.420,000 beep $172,426,000 1 tY Dist 5ys8 PRVs PRV 1- 0' Pres su re Relief at Wapiti ABANDONED VauY Struct ur e $ 47000 $ 03 000 2023 2033 new 6 .3 $ 03000 Aeep S 93,000 ®-V1r D, 00 & PRA Pre ssu re Re lie f at Elk v ain Swv tu reRanch 7 000 $ 90000 2045 2045 new 3 .3 $ 93.000 e ep $ 93,000 ® Vff Dist Sys &PRVs V ic tory Pd, Pressure Relief at Old 0405 Stru cture $ 47,000 $ 93.000 2045 $ 9 00000 4ee0 $ 93,000 ——�."�_ ® \1 Dist SysP00 re 0 10 Vic to ry Rd.. SPA v, struaura 47,00 S 0 8 .3 .000 2045 0 .3 $ 9 000 5 93,000 R elief at (r sa..a\ _ ®•fir . . \\\\ \\\\ eau __ ® $ 47,000 $ 03p00Milill 2045MEI $ 93.000 ®-vv Dist Sys 8 PRVs Red feP Pressure R elief at Pionee r v„ Struc tu re $ 47 000 $ 030 00 2045 2045 new 6 .3 $ 9 000 e ep 5 93000 Il pi M aster __—_--__----------- ® M aster M eters 8Sho p Potable Me ters Polabk me te rs and mete r pit $ 3,734,000 S 3,734.000 2023 2033 new 0 $ 734 000 4304 5 4,704,000 II I Note • aourcegcv (.200S, Waters 2022),wEP=ware/wn ae ncy Plan lMa rnok, progres s),2of5=um Su Fve9ngstudy al I 2015 0044e o yrlm. 2000=VVaiet4202),s,er= Plan Watro wna ndme n TIA 100 , 20randum00 17 yof Capita4,2015)t0 00 Pro l=ls fo r 2023 Red: High Risk O range: Medium Risk Green: Low Risk OdDaneer,o ,AlPm,er tev119a00 Fader,0 mG IPR ,orADE9IGNw..eetIn.Antn,yMaMh.o nrtmin Mnae lWate r9yatem-R,xE 4/14120239.55AM FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES DATE: April 19, 2023 MEETING: Board of Trustees Regular Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room and Virtually PRESENT Board: Mayor Philip Vandernail; Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Brian Cerkvenik, Kaydee Fisher, Lewis Gregory, Parnell Quinn and, Katie Soles Staff: Town Manager, Michael Brack; Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh; Deputy Town Clerk Leslie Crittenden; Finance Director, Rob Clemens; Public Works Director, Paul Johnson; Wastewater Plant Superintendent, Joe Fuqua; Project Manager, Monica Kopf, Police Chief, Glen Trainor Others: See attached list Mayor Vandernail called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1. Rollcall: Mayor Philip Vandernail; Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Brian Cerkvenik, Kaydee Fisher, Lewis Gregory, Parnell Quinn and, Katie Soles 2. Approval of Agenda: Trustee Quinn moved, and Trustee Soles seconded the motion to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 7-0. 3. Consent Agenda: a) Minutes April 5, 2023 b) Resolution 2023-04-02 Elk Creek Condos Filling 3 Final Acceptance and Release of Surety c) Resolution 2023-04-04 Elk Creek Condos Filling 4 Final Acceptance and Release of Surety Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda. Motion carried: 7-0. 4. Open Forum: none 5. Public Hearing: a) Ordinance No. 496 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding the Development Improvements Agreement Mayor Vandernail introduced the public hearing regarding Ordinance No. 496 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding the Development Improvements Agreement. No public comment was taken. Proof of Publication was provided in the packet. Page 2 of 3 Trustee Waldow moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to close the public hearings regarding Ordinance No. 496 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding the Development Improvements Agreement. Motion carried 7-0. Trustee Gregory moved, and Trustee Soles seconded the motion to approve Ordinance No. 496 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding the Development Improvements Agreement subject to further discussion. Motion carried 7-0. b) Ordinance No. 497 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding Changes to The Review Process Mayor Vandernail introduced the public hearing regarding Ordinance No. 497 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding Changes to The Review Process Public Comment was taken from Greg Beckler. Proof of Publication was provided in the packet. Trustee Quinn moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to close the public hearing Ordinance No. 497 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding Changes to The Review Process. Motion carried: 7-0. Trustee Waldow moved, and Trustee Soles seconded the motion to approve Ordinance No. 497 Amending Chapter 19 Regarding Changes to The Review Process Motion carried: 7-0. 6. Discussion and Possible Action: a) Ordinance No. 495 Amending Chapter 14 Regarding Grease Interceptors Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Waldow seconded the motion to approve Ordinance No. 495 Amending Chapter 14 Regarding Grease Interceptors Motion carried: 7-0. b) Industrial Pre -Treatment Program (IPP) Options The Trustees recommend Option #1 Treat Industrial Waste at the WWTP to the Joint Facilities Oversight Committee: The JFOC approves installation of Project N (nitrogen) at the cost of $12 Million (estimated) to add an additional organic waste treatment facility to enhance nitrogen removal. This would require breweries and distilleries to meet zero discharge requirements with a supplied organic waste collection tank that would be collected by WWTP operators to be used as a carbon source to enhance nitrogen removal at the WWTP. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District has a driven interest in supporting both installation and operational costs towards this project with a contribution of 70% (-$8.4M) towards this capital project. This leaves an estimated $3.6M for the JFOC to pay including any financial burden passed through to the industrial waste source i.e., Breweries, distilleries. c) Joint Facilities Oversight Committee Independent Manager Alternative Study Page 3 of 3 Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Fisher seconded the motion to oppose the contract with FCS Group to evaluate regional wastewater management and staffing alternatives for the Joint Facilities Oversight Committee. Motion carried: 7-0. d) Treasurer's Report Presented by Rob Clemens Finance Director 7. Updates a) Town Manager Michael Brack, Thank you to Monica Kopf and Public Works for the suggested code changes, Welcome Sarah Catanzarite the new Assistant Town Manager, Planning Services Options. b) Trustee Waldow Colorado Senate Bill 213 Trustee Waldow moved, and Trustee Soles seconded the motion to write a letter to Dylan Roberts to oppose SB213. Motion carried 6-1, Gregory abstained. 8. Adjourn: Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 7-0. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Antoinette McVeigh, Town Clerk TOWN BOARD REGULAR MEETING REGISTR ATION SHEET April 19, 2023 The Public Fo ru m is an opportunity f or the public to present their c oncerns and rec ommendations regarding T own Govemment issues to the Town Bo ard. Tho se wishing to address the T own Board will be allowed a fi ve-mi nute pr ese ntati on . A ma xim um of six (6) people will be allowed to address the Town Board at each P ublic F orum. If a topic that y ou wish to discuss h as been scheduled for a formal Town Board Meeting, we would ask that you reserve y our remarks f or that specific date and time. Topics that are in litigati on with the Town will no t be heard during this fo rum. All prese nters ar e urged t o: (1) state the c oncern; and (2) list p ossible s oluti ons. Please ke ep th e fo llo wing guide lines in mind: Remarks that discriminate against anyone or ad versely reflect upon the race, col or, ancestry, religi ous creed, nati onal origin, political affiliation , disability, sex, or marita l status of any pers on are out of ord er and may e nd the speaker's privilege to address the B oard . Defamatory or abusive remarks or profanity are o ut of order and will not be t olerated. Anyo ne attendin g Town Board meetings must sign in to ensure accurate rec ords and minutes. Sig n your n ame, address, and email on the sign in sheet. Thank you fo r yo ur coo peration. NAME PHYSICAL ADDRESS EMAIL v� $� `��` Proclamation 54th ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK April 30 - May 6, 2023 Whereas, The Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk, a time honored and vital part of local government exists throughout the world, and Whereas, The Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk is the oldest among public servants, and Whereas, The Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk provides the professional link between the citizens, the local governing bodies and agencies of government at other levels, and Whereas, Professional Municipal Clerks have pledged to be ever mindful of their neutrality and impartiality, rendering equal service to all. Whereas, The Professional Municipal Clerk serves as the information center on functions of local government and community. Whereas, Professional Municipal Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of the affairs of the Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk through participation in education programs, seminars, workshops and the annual meetings of their state, provincial, county and international professional organizations. Whereas, It is most appropriate that we recognize the accomplishments of the Office of the Professional Municipal Clerk. Now, Therefore, 1 , Philip Vandernail, Mayor of Fraser, do recognize the week of April 30 through May 6, 2023, as Professional Municipal Clerks Week, and further extend appreciation to our Professional Municipal Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh, Deputy Town Clerk, Leslie Crittenden, and to all Professional Municipal Clerks for the vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent. Dated this 3rd day of May, 2023 Mayor: Attest: 7 COLORADO MEMO TO: Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM: Lucus C. Seffens, Utilities Superintendent DATE: 5-3-2023 SUBJECT: Water, Sewer Rates and Impact Fee Study 010114 440 SUBJECT: Authorize the Town Manager to sign the proposal from Raftelis to create rate structure recommendations for the Town's water, sewer rates and impact fees. DEPARTMENT: Public Works PRESENTER/PREPARER: Lucus C. Seffens, Water Utilities Superintendent FISCAL INFORMATION: Cost as Recommended: $53,375 Balance Available: $90,000 Funds: $45,000 from account 55-40-330 Engineering Fees (wastewater fund) $45,000 from account 50-40-330 Engineering Fees (water fund) New Appropriation Required: No REQUESTED ACTON: Authorize the Town Manager to sign contracts with Raftelis for Water & Sewer Rates and Impact Fee studies and expend budgeted funds from Water Engineering Fees (50-40-330) and Wastewater Engineering Fees (55-40-330), not to exceed $90,000. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND OF SUBJECT MATTER: A review and adjustment to the Town's water and sewer rates was recommended by town staff in 2022. The 2023 budget directed $90,000 to be used for a Water and Sewer Rate Study. Adjustments to our water and wastewater rates are recommended by town staff due to the continued increase in customers, aging infrastructure, the rising costs of materials and services, and proper budgeting for planned Capital Infrastructure Projects. To provide transparency and objectivity in rate adjustments, best practice is to conduct a study and provide recommendations for potential rate structures. Once the study is completed, the consultants would submit their recommendations to the Town, so the Board of Trustees may have the information needed to approve and set new rates. Town staff posted a Request for Proposals on the 17th of March, 2023. Two bids were submitted to the Town on the 14th of April, 2023. After being reviewed by town staff, Raftelis was selected as the most qualified candidate to conduct the study. Scope of Work: Project Management and Meetings $8,090 Customer Usage Analysis $6,030 Water/Wastewater Plant Development Fees $7,785 10 -year Financial Plan $9,765 Water and Wastewater Cost of Service $7,785 Rate Design $7,665 Board Presentations and Reports $6,255 Total $53,375 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Notice of Award May 4, 2023 Completed By July 19, 2023 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the REQUESTED ACTION as a motion. _11 vell cud II r I'd_Yfs,s x ()x I:° w .r C`, ,',„„) 804,42 d w fce 9";11'(.).-";11"„',',1!!.(3.-54.9.1.. fla uP: '1.,...)".70.;"..7.2.6.-55.1...E.',.;', TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2023-05-01 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH RAFTELIS FOR THE WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE SRUDY WHEREAS, the Town of Fraser has planned and budgeted for the Water & Wastewater Rate Study. WHEREAS, the Town of Fraser received two bids for this project and has chosen the most qualified bidder to complete the work. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1. The Town of Fraser Trustees authorizes the Town Manager to enter into contract with Raftelis for the completion of the Water and Wastewater Rate Study for a price not to exceed $90,000 which includes a contingency towards change orders if needed. READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THIS 5t—" DAY OF MAY 2023. Votes in favor: Votes opposed: Abstained: (S E A L) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO BY: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk 1111111111111111111111111 A 11 111010101 is Town of Fraser „ i p m v v�r r is n , v iii"I/ 11,, „' III I `/ IIII`(( „l l �i,'% ii, „0,,a„ ��J//° vii , ;,v IIII`. PROPOSAL / APRIL 12, 2023 11114 40) 114 WRAA ',1,1111,1,11'1',,,11„1 11',)111111,1111 ,1 u.1IN 111 Ir piwi, n,wul: �� Imp RA TIMS April 12, 2023 Mr. Paul Johnson Project Manager Town of Fraser 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, CO 80442 Subject: Proposal for Water and Sewer Utility Rate Study Dear Mr. Johnson: A successful water and wastewater study could be the difference between a town's reliable water future, and stressful financial decisions and even tougher rates down the line. We appreciate the opportunity to work with the Town of Fraser (Town) as you look toward your future with this 2023 water and sewer study. We've tailored our approach based on the needs you've identified and our experience assisting other West Slope communities. Like many utilities, the Town is challenged with maintaining infrastructure and unfunded mandates from State and Federal agencies to meet more stringent water quality requirements. In addition, the Town is experiencing rapid growth requiring expansions to their water and wastewater facilities. These externalities will directly affect the utility's financial health and will put upward pressure on rates and fees. Raftelis is one of the most experienced financial consultants to utilities in the country, and with offices in Denver and Silverthorne, we have expertise serving dozens of utilities in Colorado, where our recommendations are readily adopted and implemented. Our team has considerable experience in utility financial management, rate and fee studies, and infrastructure funding. Well -versed in finances, we go beyond studying and setting rates. We know engaging your stakeholders on major public policy decisions like water rates can be complicated, and our evolving communication landscape makes it even more complex. As the people who design and carryout the study, we're also here to support your rate study process from start to finish by ensuring your community not only understands why you're undertaking a rate study, but also feels heard through the process. We'll use our knowledge of public participation and unique experience communicating about water and wastewater rates to guide you and your community through this study. Melissa Elliott, APR will serve as Project Director and will be responsible for the project's success to your satisfaction. Melissa has over 25 years of experience helping utilities tell their stories to customers. Prior to Raftelis, Melissa led strategic communications and stakeholder engagement at two major water utilities — Aurora Water and Denver Water. She is also a past president of the American Water Works Association. She has extensive experience working with elected officials, stakeholders, and the public on issues as diverse as rate structure change, drought, water quality, potable reuse, affordability, impactful construction projects, rate increases, customer assistance programs, and demand management. 22ii,„3 irrruii 11 to iru k w"i:„o d m ii l vrr, u tVir„1 irrrrrr..m, II' 0 8049 uwwrwr.0 rrII'te liiw.rr:‘„nriin I will serve as the Project Manager, responsible for the day-to-day operations of the project and overseeing the technical analysis needed for this study. I have more than 20 years of national utility financial experience, including serving clients in Colorado. In fact, I was the Rates Manager at Denver Water for more than 6 years. I am also a co - instructor of AWWA's Financial Management Cost of Service seminar and am leading the update to the AWWA Rates Manual of Practice — Principles of Rates, Fees, and Charges. Most important to you, I have assisted a number of Western Slope utilities in recent years, including the Towns of Breckenridge, Eagle, Project 7 Water Authority (serving Montrose County) and the Cities of Rifle, and Durango. I am proud of the resources that we can offer and ask for the opportunity to assist the Town on this engagement. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Todd Cristiano Senior Manager 22ii,„3 irrruii11tirriru k w"i:„o d miiIIvrr,utVir„1ir rJI149 uwwrwr.0 rrII'te liiw.rr:‘„nriin lll, U 111. A �,1(I � 111 lj;�,J �� 1(I � ��. f(I 1(I Vl b, ° �ll �➢� a � 1, JU((�TA. a«IC all. 11111ilU r gto cairro,, : We are committed to doing our part to fight prejudice, racism, and discrimination by becoming more informed, disengaging with business partners that do not share this commitment, and encouraging our employees to use their skills to work toward a more just society that has no barriers to opportunity. REGISTERED UNICIPAL p Yf1 01 i°U1 1111 ll rr 1 °r', ,;01! :i"7(:`;"d. fi aJ 1731 111,11 loS l((E Ili 7o 3. a,8 a,. f/ tip 1 m io.°i..e lil III D,..1. Registration as a Municipal Advisor is a requirement under the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. All firms that provide financial forecasts that include assumptions about the size, timing, and terms for possible future debt issues, as well as debt issuance support services for specific proposed bond issues, including bond feasibility studies and coverage forecasts, must be registered with the SEC and MSRB to legally provide financial opinions and advice. Raftelis' registration as a Municipal Advisor means our clients can be confident that Raftelis is fully qualified and capable of providing financial advice related to all aspects of financial planning in compliance with the applicable regulations of the SEC and the MSRB. Table of Contents Qualifications 1 Experience 23 Fees 38 Exceptions 39 Appendix: Work Sample 40 " II II fl � II ' :III �IiII � II 1 II 11 11 II II °� ' CAE) /IA. Ill III 'lll l;://, Ilf"Ill 111'JS Who is Raftelis 111 11 11 111 11 111 ,U� n�ID 11 11 1 °,off 13 A fff Local government and utility leaders partner with Raftelis to transform their organizations by enhancing performance, planning for the future, identifying top talent, improving their financial condition, and telling their story. We've helped more than 600 organizations in the last year alone. We believe that Raftelis is the 7h t for this project. We provide several key factors that will benefit the Town and help to make this project a success. RIII Sq 1111C IIIIIIIIIS This project will require the resources necessary to effectively staff the project and the skillsets to complete all of the required components. With more than 140 consultants, Raftelis has the largest water -industry financial and management consulting practice in the nation, including many of the industry's leading rate consultants and experts in key related areas, like stakeholder engagement and data analytics. Our depth of resources will allow us to provide the Town of Fraser (Town) with the technical expertise necessary to meet your objectives. ID lu ' III'" II III IIII II P yi',,u II I III W I II II 1111E0 NM I II II I II'I ° /%VIII I llI 0 IN „, When your elected officials and customers are considering the validity of recommended changes, they want to be confident that they were developed by experts using the latest industry standard methodology. Our staff are involved in shaping industry standards by chairing committees within the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and the Water Environment Federation (WEF) and co- authoring many industry -standard books regarding utility finance and rate setting. Being actively involved in the industry will allow us to keep the Town informed of emerging trends and issues and to be confident that our recommendations are insightful and founded on sound industry principles. In addition, with Raftelis' registration as a Municipal Advisor, you can be confident that we are fully qualified and capable of providing financial advice related to all aspects of utility financial planning in compliance with federal regulations. 1111h111I STI 0 lllNY 0IIl"' S UC I II ,SSE S: An extensive track record of past similar work will help to avoid potential pitfalls on this project and provide the know-how to bring it across the finish line. Raftelis staff has assisted 1,000+ utilities throughout the U.S. with financial and rate consulting services with wide-ranging needs and objectives. More important to you, the project team for this engagement has assisted several utilities throughout Colorado giving us a deep understanding of the issues Colorado communities face. 1111/V111"III S " Ill" 111MIII" /6kd III)01112 III) For the study to be a success, rates must be successfully approved and implemented. Even the most comprehensive rate study is of little use if the recommendations are not approved and implemented. Raftelis has assisted numerous agencies with getting proposed rates successfully adopted. We focus on effectively communicating with elected officials about the financial consequences and rationale behind recommendations to ensure stakeholder buy -in and successful rate adoption. Our project manager has assisted utilities throughout Colorado to gets rates approved — the Town of Breckenridge, Eagle, the City of Durango, Rifle, and the Project 7 Water Authority serving Montrose County. III;9; U""• •IIIIIIIII 30 years serving the public sector �� ��� ullrJJJ1 How we stack up u lull d����JJJ, ft,,gater fort„,;t1J„/ .,mINe tech oIlrrygy for t poubIII III YS rr1ee e ha r ll l4 ',,0 (7 �JJ����� ///%/ ` II' n �'e Ire Of (4/9:74;,, 2i11) II/I/III�� 110111"11 l % �% (r�. l/// // ',/-1111110 % �/ � �iii ii ii �iiii r., d i � �d rp y ii im' « om.., ra /ai,./°rPlrr mi��.. ° ,/r��' f 1 11011ll11 %///// ,���� ; a- ����iii 11111111m 1111fffl�r,,,, orr 11111 61 » rrrr»»,< ,rrr, a of anir r rrn rir ,. ri « u ri i if i rir, oi. r r « rr u i r o,,. nnrr r m,. i rii ao « r o rr d of r w rr aria. r r rr r r r r ii /r,. ,r rr r i i p r ri �( U or. ,r u �.r . 0/ 0 % ( Prr / lli / Vii, Rr. / %, f6» ( / llla llla r�/ r ,U r �o Y Y r , , , i U iJ r i , rnp rnr,0i�y�» 1,. 1 1,�,/J � � a<G,<r„ , rrr l� „� �1111) »��,�/1 1,��,/r,,a�� Illll��l����llll�h 4r � Illll��lf�� � IIII �II � � / Illl �fl �f� lllll �lf��lllll r� r� � ��Illl l�h �l � JJJr+ Pl � l lllll�lf��llll �i f��llll Jr � � � r� Oa r2. �9771��1G�i��11; Dri,, %, lf,ient 0�'y%ottetGI RAFTELIS HAS PROVIDED ASSISTANCE FOR 500+ public agencies ' and utilities that serve more than including the agencies serving 250iof the U.S. population in the past year alone, we worked on 1,000 38 of the nation's 50 largest cities projects 600+ agencies 46 states for in uuR U.m•uu s Key Project Staff If Sli 112 11 11 1 1, 1 11 1 11 111 11 11 l�t A 1111 f 1111 '�J�fff 41111131r fff it111111111111111 11 11 111 Ill y/G 0, H 111 1 ffff I III r; ffff uuw uuw �lv I ii ii ((I )1111 1 11 1 rrr. fff 0 fff 1 111 11 11 11 11 Our team includes senior -level professionals to provide experienced project leadership with support from talented consultant staff. This close-knit group has frequently collaborated on similar successful projects, providing the Town with confidence in our capabilities. Here, we have included an organizational chart showing the structure of our project team. On the following pages, we have included resumes for each of our team members as well as a description of their role on the project. Town of Fraser Melissa Elliott, APR Re).1111EICT IVAlit11P' 1�i�17 °fo ol»»CFN11N11114 A„1„„ JIMISOR Todd Cristiano Andrew Rheem Lundyn Harrelson Matthew Canfield uir u; U 1"111 , s PROJECT DIRECTOR Executive Vice President 1111.C3111„„„IIIE Melissa will be responsible for overall project accountability and will be available to provide quality assurance and control, industry perspective, and insights into the project. III , III OII III II III ;; Melissa's 25+ year career is focused on helping utilities and municipalities tell their stories. As an executive and leader for Raftelis' western offices, she has responsibility for service delivery to clients across the Western US. She also consults with local government and utility leaders as part of Raftelis' nation- wide Strategic Communication Services practice, providing strategic counsel on communications and outreach planning, stakeholder engagement, and risk communication strategies. Melissa has extensive experience working with elected officials, stakeholders, and the public on issues as diverse as rate structure change, drought, water quality, potable reuse, affordability, impactful construction projects, rate increases, customer assistance programs, and demand management. Highly active in the water industry, Melissa is a past president of the American Water Works Association, former chair of AWWA's Public Affairs Council, and a regular volunteer for The Water Research Foundation. She has an M.S. in technical communication and a B.A. in journalism and is Accredited in Public Relations (APR) from the Public Relations Society of America. Prior to joining Raftelis, Melissa directed the public affairs efforts at Denver Water, which included creating public engagement strategies for massive infrastructure projects, developing a nationally recognized lead service line replacement program, and leading conservation outreach efforts through the innovative "Use Only What You Need" campaign. II��III �"�N" Ill�llli:����lll ��'ff�" II I i�lll "III ''°'�III�III III III''���, III�IC Fort Collins -Loveland Water District (CO) Fort Collins -Loveland Water District's (FCLWD) rate study recommendations demonstrated the need for significant changes to both their water rates and their system development fees. The utility is investing in increasing its water supply and had not previously done public engagement work. It needed a way to explain the rate study to customers while seeking customer acceptance of higher rates and developer acceptance of a new way of charging for tap fees. Melissa developed a strategic communications plan for FCLWD, guided staff through the plan implementation, and developed several community outreach strategies for the utility, including hosting two successful community open houses to provide context for the proposed changes. V1L 0\1 Specialties Utility Rate Study Communications o Facilitation for Committees Strategic communication planning 0, Stakeholder engagement Public involvement 0, Community outreach Crisis & risk communication Reputation management Coalition building & campaigns (if Professional History Raftelis: Executive Vice President (2022 — present) Vice President of Communications and Marketing (2021-2022); Director of Strategic Communication Services (2018- 2020) Denver Water: Director of Public Affairs (2012-2018); Manager of Water Conservation (2008-2012) Aurora Water: Manager of Public Relations (2000-2008) Education • Graduate, Water & Wastewater Leadership Center - University of North Carolina, Kenan-Flagler Business School (2016) o Master of Science in Technical Communication (Public Relations) - Colorado State University (2005) Bachelor of Arts in Technical Journalism (Public Relations) - Colorado State University (1991) Professional Memberships y AWWA: Past President; Former Public Affairs Council Chair; Former Strategic Planning Committee Chair AWWA/WEF Transformative Issues Symposium on Affordability: Former Chair WEF NACWA US Water Alliance One Water Council o Public Relations Society of America: Accredited in Public Relations (APR) uu;u; U .m.uu s Northern Water (CO) As Northern Water begins transitioning into a new, more broad -based outreach phase for its Northern Integrated Supply Project, the agency sought assistance with developing and implementing communications strategies that support several major efforts. Melissa's work includes strategic counsel, especially in the development of messaging and informational material; development and implementation of stakeholder engagement efforts and assistance in maintaining online public involvement tools; social and traditional media planning and execution, including the development of media calendars and content, and development and implementation of strategies to increase earned and paid media. City of Golden (CO) The City retained Raftelis to develop comprehensive financial plans, cost -of -service analyses, and rate designs sufficient to support a recommendation to City Council to adjust rates for water, sewer, and drainage operations. The study included convening an ad -hoc Utility Rate Citizen Committee. Melissa facilitated the committee meetings, which resulted in recommending proposed alternatives to the City Council for their review and feedback. This study is complete, and Council adopted the Committee's recommendation. Upper Thompson Sanitation District (CO) Located just outside of Rocky Mountain National Park, Upper Thompson Sanitation District (UTSD) needed to invest in a new wastewater treatment plant to meet future regulatory requirements and ensure that it could handle the needs of a community that swells in size when tourists visit the famous national park. As project manager, Melissa oversaw the development of a strategic communication plan and accompanying outreach that helps inform UTSD's customers and build support from UTSD's key influencers for the new treatment plant before UTSD must increase rates to help fund the infrastructure investment. III PU III i. .Jy lll C;"1"' 111„„„1119"1"' • American Water Works Association (CO) — Risk Communications Guide, Affordability Guide • Birmingham Water Works Board (AL) — Cost of Service Rate Study • Boston Water and Sewer Commission (MA) — Stormwater Program Development and Communication • Bullhead City (NV) — Communications to Support Private Utility Acquisition • Central Brown County Water Authority (WI) — Utility Collaboration Services • City of Abilene (TX) — Comprehensive Rate Study • City of Aurora (CO) — Strategic Plan • City of Boulder (CO) — Carbon Taxes Policy Engagement • City of Calgary (AB) — Cost of Service and Rate Design • City of Charleston (SC) — Citywide Communication Optimization • City of Corona (CA) — Facilitation • City of Eagan (MN) — Strategic Plan • City of Golden (CO) — 5 -year Rate Study and Strategic Plan • City of Lakewood (OH) — Stormwater Program Development and Communication • City of Newport (OR) — Capital Project Construction Stakeholder Engagement and Communication • City of Newport Beach (CA) — Comprehensive Rate Study • City of Oxnard (CA) — Comprehensive Cost of Service Rate Study • City of Port Hueneme (CA) — Cost of Service Rate Study • City of Santa Cruz (CA) — Rate Structure Change Communication and Stakeholder Engagement • Charlotte Water (NC) — Strategic Communications • Cucamonga Valley Water District (CA) — Water Rate Study Communications and Outreach • Daphne Utilities (AL) — Strategic Communication Planning and Risk Communications III;9; U""" "111111111 6 6 • Eastgate Council of Governments (OH) — Regional Utility Collaboration • Encina Wastewater Authority (CA) — Facilitation Services • Green Bay Water (WI) — Strategic Communications Services • Fort Collins/Loveland Water District (CO) — Communications to Support Cost of Service Rate Study • Jersey Water Works (NJ) — Strategic Communications Services • Johnson City (TN) — Risk Communications • Lehigh County Authority (PA) — Comprehensive Strategic Plan • Louisville Water (KY) — Internal Communication Plan • Marin Municipal Water District (CA) — Facilitation for 10 -year Capital Plan • Mojave Water Authority (CA) — Stakeholder Committee Facilitation and Communication Services • Montecito Water District (CA) — Rate Change Communications and Engagement • Mount Pleasant Water Works (SC) — Strategic Communication Services • Municipal Water District of Orange County (CA) — Facilitation Services • National Association of Clean Water Agencies (DC) — 50th Anniversary Communications • Nevada Irrigation District (CA) — Public Outreach Services and Planning • New York AWWA (NY) — Public Communication Training • Northern Water (CO) — Capital Project Construction Stakeholder Engagement and Communication • Region of Peel (ON) — Rate Structure Change Stakeholder Engagement • Richmond Public Utilities (VA) — Affordability Program Customer Engagement • Sacramento Suburban Water District (CA) — Regional Utility Collaboration • Santa Clara Valley Water District (CA) — Water Rate Implementation Planning • Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans (LA) — Settlement Billing Communications • Sweetwater Authority (CA) — Strategic Communications Planning • Tucson Water (AZ) — Communication Services • Tuolumne Utilities District (CA) — Rate Study and Communications Planning • Water Environment Federation (DC) — Biosolids PR Toolkit • WSSC Water (MD) — Utility Rate Change Communication and Outreach III '' LI 1113111 III CC/41r I II C 111"))' • "Trending in an Instant," Risk Communication Guide for Utilities, Lead Author, AWWA, 2019 • "Consider the Importance of Risk Communication," Article, Journal AWWA, 2019 • "Public Affairs - Getting to Know Your Stakeholders in Advance of a Rate Change," Article, Journal AWWA, 2017 II I g IR ES II I 111")1 "°ff /rye fff , • "Communications and Infrastructure Investment," Jersey Water Works Annual Conference, 2019 • "Getting to Yes, Communication Strategies to Gain Support for Rate Increases," Association of California Water Agencies Spring Conference, 2019 • "Putting People as Our Focus," Keynote for WaterNow Alliance Annual Summit, 2019 • "Telling Your Story Through Content Marketing," Half -day Workshop at Utility Management Conference, 2019 • "Putting the Water Industry's Focus in the Right Place," Young Professionals Summit, 2019 • "Communication Strategies to Gain Support for Capital Replacement Funding," Utility Management Conference, 2019 • "The Shape of Water," Engaging Local Government Leaders Annual Meeting, 2018 • "Building Support for Rate Structure Change," WaterNow Alliance Annual Summit, 2018 • "How to Ace Your Rate Study," Special District Association Annual Conference, 2018 • "Building Support for Rate Structure Change," WaterNow Alliance Workshop, 2017 • "Communicating About Water Quality: Lead Case study #1: Denver Water," AWWA Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017 IIIR U .m.uir s • "Providing a Customer Outreach Program Related to Lead Service Line Replacement," AWWA Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017 • "The Recipe to Success in Implementing a Water Rates Campaign: Case Studies," AWWA Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017 • "Factoring Affordability into Rate Structure Change," Webinar for AWWA Infrastructure Finance Series: Innovative Strategies for Customer Affordability, 2017 • "What Lies Beneath: Challenges in Maintaining Water Infrastructure," Government Finance Officers Association Annual Conference, 2017 • "Flint and Lead: The Water -Public Health Connection," Webinar for AWWA and American Public Health Association, 2016 )(1,.(1„. PROJECT MANAGER Senior Manager 1111 III II Todd will be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the project. He will oversee the technical analysis and ensure the approach follows industry standards and Raftelis' quality control process. IIIlDIII ��'�III III II I .. 111 1 "u Todd has nearly 20 years of utility finance experience -14 years as a consultant to utilities and 6 years as the Manager of Rates at Denver Water. He has completed studies across the U.S. for water, wastewater, stormwater, electric, and gas utilities. His experience covers technical areas and industries such as municipal fee development, utility cost -of -service and rate structure studies, economic feasibility analyses, impact fee studies, and budget processes. While at Denver Water, he oversaw four significant rate- and fee - related studies, all unanimously approved by the Board of Water Commissioners, and also served as interim budget manager at Denver Water. As a member of the AWWA, he has helped to develop industry guidelines regarding financial and rate -making practices. In particular, as the Past Chair and current member of the AWWA Rates and Charges Committee, he co- authored the water reuse chapter in the latest edition of Manual Ml, Principles of Water Rates, Fees and Charges. Todd is also co -instructor for the AWWA's biennial Financial Management: Cost -of -Service Rate -Making Seminar. IF" II I O JJ 1 11 Cff ' II I 7) 111 ' 1E 11 l i 1 11 1 111"11) City of Aspen (CO) Todd served as the project manager on this engagement. Todd has provided financial consulting service to the City of Aspen since 2002. The City completes comprehensive water and electric cost of service and rate studies approximately every 5 years. Financial planning review and true -ups are completed annually, The cost of service studies include a the development of a long-range financial plan, cost of service analysis, and rate design for each utility. The cost of service analysis for both utilities follows generally accepted industry rate -setting standards. Rates are designed based on the cost of service results. When there are significant changes to a class' cost of service or the fixed or variable component of the rate, the City will transition that change over a 5 -year period. The City's water rate structure is based on Equivalent Capacity Units (ECUs). The fixed charge scales based each customers number of ECUs and the tiered rate structure also scales with the number of ECUs. The electric rate structure follows the traditional residential, small and large commercial customer classes. The residential customer class is a 4 -tiered increasing block structure. Specialties Financial planning Cost -of -service & rate structure studies Litigation support O Economic feasibility analyses Impact fee studies - utility & non - utility Reviews of policies, procedures, & operating practices Budget processes na Professional History rlf Raftelis: Senior Manager (2019 - present); Manager O (2017-2018) Stantec (2016-2017) 0 Denver Water: Manager of Rates (2010-2016) 0 Malcolm Pirnie-Arcadis-US 0 (2005-2010) tlG Black & Veatch (1998-2005) Education Master of Business Administration • - University of Colorado (2003) O Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering - University of Tulsa (1995) Professional Memberships • AWWA: Past Chair and current member of Rates & Charges Committee • WEF Raftelis also completes special projects. These include developing low income rates for the electric utility. Currently, we are examining the cost to the utility that solar customer place on their electric system. Energy from solar panels is distributed back into the distribution grid but does not offset peak demands. The current credit to solar customers includes the cost of transmission and generation. We are also examining the cost of supply EV charging stations. III;9; U"""'1"IIII1R„1:1 Town of Breckenridge (CO) Todd served as the project manager on this engagement. The Town of Breckenridge had not completed a comprehensive rate study in recent years. The Town retained Raftelis to develop a 10 -year financial plan, cost of service, plant investment fees and rate design alternatives. The Town had just completed the construction of a new water treatment facility as well as repairs to the Tarn Dam. The Tarn Dam repairs were unexpected and required the issuance of state loans. The Town also used state loans to fund a portion of the new WTP. These loans and additional O&M expense from the new WTP caused coverage to fall below the SRF targets of 1.1x debt service. Raftelis developed a 10 -year financial plan using unform annual revenue adjustments to avoid rate shock. Raftelis also completed a comprehensive cost of service analysis. The analysis showed nominal changes in each class' responsibility. During this process, the project team met regularly with the Rate Advisory Committee to discuss rate design alternatives to address the objectives set forth by the committee — conservation, affordability, and equity. Raftelis presented over 20 rate structure alternatives. The Town's existing rate structure is a base fee based on the number SFEs, includes a 10,000 gallons volume allowance and a volumetric rate for usage above the 10,000 gallons. The 10,000 gallon minimum scales with the number of SFEs for each customer. The existing commercial rate structure includes a base fee which varies by meter size, includes a minimum which varies by meter size, and a volumetric rate for usage over the minimum. The selected residential rate structure retained the existing components but reduced the minimum threshold to 6,000 gallons and added a second tier for the usage over the minimum The selected commercial rate structure eliminated the base fee and assessed a volumetric rate for all usage. The new rate structures were adopted to be implemented in June 2023 and the rate adjustment was adopted for January 2024. Project 7 Water Authority (CO) Todd was the project manager on this engagement. Project 7 Water Authority (Authority) is the only wholesale water provider to the Cities of Montrose, Delta, the Town of Olathe, Tri-County Water Conservancy District, Menoken Water District, Chipeta Water District, and the Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association The Authority's was source is primarily from the Gunnison River delivered from the Cystal Resevoir through the Gunnison Tunnel to the Authorities Ridgeway Water Treatment Plant. The remainder of water is provided by the Cimarron Ditch. Due to recent fires and the aging infrastructure, the Authority was looking to improve the reliability of the system under emergency conditions. The Authority retained Raftelis to develop ong-range cash flows to show the impacts to rates in building this redundancy project. The redundancy pipeline project totals $120 million which will require significant rate increases. Raftelis is evaluating different funding strategies to minimize the impact to rates and the financial risk to the Authority. The Authority is anticipating the use of WIFIA loans and SRF loans to fund the project. Raftelis is assisting the Authority in securing a credit rating from Fitch through a comprehensive financial plan and using that financial plan to justify the WIFIA and SRF funding needs. The WIFIA loan process is complex and requires meeting several financial metrics. However, the terms of these loans is very flexible. As a result, Raftelis has developed a number of funding options for the Authority's consideration. Town of Wellington (CO) Todd was the project manager on this engagement. The Town of Wellington provides service to approximately 4,200 water and wastewater accounts. The Town has experienced rapid growth in the past few years and their water and wastewater utilities are reaching their maximum capacities. Raftelis provided financial planning, rate and fee assistance to ensure the future financial viability of both utilities. In addition, their tap fees had not been updated in some time. There was concern that the current water and wastewater rate structures were not encompassing the community values (i.e. wise use of water, cost proportionality, essential use affordability) and not recovering costs. As part of the study, Raftelis participated in stakeholder meetings with Town citizens to provide background on the study, the process, and identify rate structure pricing objectives to help them design the best rate structure for the community. Over the course of the rate design development with the stakeholder group, Raftelis separately completed a 5 -year financial plan analysis for both utilities, a comprehensive cost -of -service analysis to assign the appropriate costs to customer classes, and developed over 15 rate structure alternatives between the water and uu;u; U .m•uu s wastewater utilities. In addition, we updated their tap fees with minor recommendations to the multifamily assessment schedule and the wastewater tap fee assessment schedule. Raftelis provided an informational presentation to the Board in June outlining the components of the study and will be participating in two presentations later in September 2022 where the Board will vote on the rate and fee proposal. The project is anticipated to be complete by October 2022. Town of Eagle (CO) Todd served as the project manager on this engagement. Todd has worked on two engagement with the Town since 2018. The most current study was a wastewater financial plan and tap fee study. The Town was in the process of developing a 10 -year capital program with significant expenditures to meet regulatory requirements. Todd developed a 10 -year cash flow analysis with proposed revenue adjustments. Todd prepared multiple scenarios based on a variety of growth scenarios from new development. The timing of the new development was not exactly known. Couple that with soaring construction pricing and the covid-19 pandemic, Todd worked closely with the planning department to determine the most likely scenarios. In addition, Todd evaluated the Town's wastewater tap fee. The fee was last updated in 2017. Todd conducted a detailed analysis of establishing flow data for 1.0 SFE as there was not historical data available. Todd also discovered inconsistencies between the water tap fee schedule and wastewater fee schedule. The Town decided to pause on the study and start a comprehensive review of both tap fees in 2022. Todd served as the project manager on the 2018 engagement. The Town had retained a consultant in 2016 to develop a financial plan and rate design for their water utility. Following iterations of the report and feedback from stakeholders, the Town requested Raftelis to conduct a peer review of the Excel model, results, and provide any recommendations on the study. Raftelis worked with the Town's consultant, reviewed detailed billing data, financials, rate design options and the Excel model's structure. Overall, Raftelis found the assumptions and results of the model sound, accurately documented, and the financial plan projections were reasonable based on the assumptions provided by the Town. We provided comments on the Consultant's rate design options as they related to meeting conservation goals, equity, and impact to customers. We provided a technical memorandum summarizing our results. This memorandum was presented to the Town's Board of Trustees for review and comment. City of Durango (CO) Todd served as the project manager on this engagement. The City of Durango (City) retained Raftelis to conduct a comprehensive, independent assessment of its water and wastewater utilities and provide recommendations on revenue adjustments, cost of service and rate design. The City's broad objective of the study was to adequately fund water and wastewater utility operations, foreseeable capital costs, and any future bonded debt, which will be supported by the proposed rates. The study included a comprehensive review of the City's water and wastewater funds and budgets, an inventory of the water and wastewater capital assets, customer classes, current usage data, future planned service area growth, and any other information deemed necessary. This analysis included a review and update of the City's water and wastewater plant investment fees. The City also requested a review of the rate differential between inside City and outside City customers. The City's last comprehensive study was completed in 2014 which recommended large rate adjustments to fund an upcoming wastewater treatment construction project and a water treatment plant. The City has continued to focus efforts on ongoing repair and replacement for the wastewater treatment plant. The new water plant's primary purpose is to provide redundancy and provide for some growth in the system. The water capital program also included ongoing repair and replacement projects. Raftelis prepared several water financial plan alternatives for staff's review and review by the City's Public Utility Commission's stakeholder group. Raftelis also developed cost - of -service -based rates for inside and outside City water and wastewater customers. As an alternative, Raftelis also uu;u; U .m•uu s .I developed outside City rates based on a rate differential (i.e. higher rates for outside City). This rate was developed based on the premise that the density of customers outside the City was lower than inside City. This lower density required more distribution infrastructure to serve outside City customers. Raftelis calculated a density ratio for inside and outside City customers based on the number of accounts per length of main. This ratio was applied to distribution -related costs in the cost -of -service analysis to arrive at a rate differential for inside and outside City customers. Raftelis also updated the City's plant investment fees considering the replacement costs of current assets. Because there is sufficient capacity in the current system, no future expansion costs were included in the fee. The 3/4 -inch meter equivalency used to develop the 3/4 -inch meter fee was based on peak demand for all 3/4 -inch meter water users and 3/4 -inch meter average winter flows for wastewater. City of Rifle (CO) Todd served as the project manager on this engagement. The City of Rifle retained Raftelis and an engineering consultant to update the City's water and wastewater master plan and to develop a financial plan and rate structures to support the future financial viability of the water and wastewater utilities. Raftelis developed multiple financial plans based on various capital improvement scenarios and funding options. In addition, to help support paying for the cost of growth, Raftelis updated the City's system development fees which had not been updated in some time. The analysis showed an increase was required for both the water and wastewater utilities. Rate adjustments and the proposed system development fees were adopted in 2021 City of Golden (CO) The City of Golden (City) provided water, sewer, and drainage services to approximately 5,400 customers through separate self-supporting enterprise funds. Rates charged for services must be adequate to support maintenance and operations, debt service, capital improvements, asset reinvestment, and transfers for general administration. This City requested a comprehensive financial and rate analysis on their water, wastewater, and stormwater utilities. They wished to focus on the rate structures, updates to the cost -of -service with recommendations on the best alternatives for equitable and sustainable revenue recovery by each customer class. The last cost -of -service study was completed over 10 years ago. Also part of this study was convening a Utility Rate Citizens Committee (URCC) to review and provide recommendations on rate alternatives based on identified pricing objectives. Raftelis developed rate alternatives for each utility. Raftelis prepared financial plans, cost -of -service analysis, and rate design for each utility. Using the pricing objectives from the URCC, we developed three alternatives for water, two for wastewater, and two for stormwater. For stormwater, of particular interest was improving the equity between residential and commercial customer classes. The existing residential fee is on a per dwelling unit basis and commercial is based on individual impervious area. Raftelis developed a impervious area fee for both residential and commercial. This increased the residential fee and reduced the commercial fee. The City adopted the new rates and rate structures for 2020. Town of Erie (CO) The Town of Erie retained Raftelis to complete a comprehensive water, wastewater, storm drainage rate and fee study. The Town updates is cost of service rates every five years and adopts rates for the future five years. The Town has continued to experience growth since early 2000 which has required the need to acquire new water rights and build new infrastructure. II2; U"". .IIIIIIIII E2 � liilk Raftelis completed a detailed analysis of water and wastewater usage and billing data as usage per account continues to decrease. We projected revenue requirements for the study period and developed a separate cash flow to track growth -related activities. This included tap fees revenue bond issues, infrastructure projects, and debt service payments. The overall goal of these financial plans was to minimize the increase to existing customers and ensure that growth pays its own way. Unfortunately, there are years where growth -related revenue did not meet the growth -related expenditures. In that instance, rate revenues are required to fill that deficiency. We developed rate adjustments that were `smooth and steady' and used reserve build up to fund portions of the growth -related projects. Raftelis presented results to Council in late 2019. The rates and fees were adopted for the 2020 fiscal year. Denver Water (CO) Originally developed to provide for Denver Water's revenue needs while encouraging conservation, the organization's current rate structure had not undergone a full-scale rate structure study in 20 years. Much has changed since that time -water use habits, average demand and peak day needs, available technology, revenue stability, and an increased emphasis on the customer experience -for a start. To gain support for this initiative, Todd presented key drivers to the CEO and Board. Coming off of the 2013 drought and floods raised the issue of revenue instability to the forefront. Todd served as the project manager on this engagement, which included assistance from Denver Water's Public Affairs Division as well as an outside facilitator. Todd oversaw and managed a `lessons - learned' workshop co -sponsored with the Water Research Foundation, an external affordability study, a customer rate perception survey, as well as a 20 -person stakeholder group. Todd led in-house development of all rate structure modeling with staff. Denver Water outside -city customers make up 50% of revenues and usage for the utility. Denver Water serves these customers through contracts with special districts called "distributors." Distributors are charged in accordance with Denver's Charter provisions, "outside -city rate recover the full cost of providing service plus an additional amount." In 1990, the Board developed a cost -of -service model using the utility -basis of rate setting. This was used to address the significant population growth outside the city with a decline of population in the city of Denver. As time progressed, the methodology became less suitable, more complex, and more opaque. The Board deteiniined that the utility -basis was no longer workable under current conditions. Todd led this project and developed cost allocation alternatives that both met current circumstances of a growing Denver, satisfied the Charter provisions, and equitably allocated costs between inside and outside city customers. Over a 14 month process, Todd evaluated several alternatives, worked with a Distributor Task Force, and met with Board members individually to review model alternatives. The Board adopted the new cash basis methodology in May 2013. Denver Water assesses System Development Charges (SDCs) for new connections to the system. SDCs were updated annually however, the last analysis of the structure was completed in 1999. Todd led an internal team to address inconsistencies in the calculations of capacity costs. The SDCs were developed using the `hybrid' method which considers available capacity with future capacity projects. The unit cost of capacity using the hybrid method was used to develop the fee schedule for each type of development. This uniform unit cost ensured equitable recovery from all classes of customers. Todd developed `SDC guidelines' to assist Water Sales staff in assessing SDCs based on the changes adopted by the Board. Todd met with Distributor representatives, members of the developer community as well as the Citizen's Advisory Council to review alternatives and present findings. uuu;AU 1"MO M, s :r1 YfD, VIA.1 Jll„ TEHNICAL ADVISOR Senior Manager 1111.C3111„„„IIIE Andrew will provide oversight for the project ensuring it meets both Raftelis and industry standards. IIIlDIII i��lll III II I III �� �u Andrew has been providing financial planning, impact fee and rate consulting services to water, wastewater, reclaimed water, and stormwater utilities and local government for nearly 20 years, including studies for numerous Colorado, Arizona, Montana, Utah, New Mexico, California, and Texas local governments. Andrew has assisted large municipalities to small towns or special districts serving a few hundred customers. He has served as project director, project manager and/or lead analyst for multiple long-standing clients providing a range of municipal financial planning, rate, and impact fee assistance through multiple engagements. Andrew is a board member of the Growth and Infrastructure Consortium (formerly the impact fee round table) and served as the 2018 conference president held in Scottsdale. Andrew is also a skilled presenter and has presented study findings and recommendations to management and governing bodies. Andrew holds Bachelors in Business Administration, Finance and Accounting from the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor. MK. MEV"' MP IIK°mm,„Ul 1 11 U": ME X. MM.:2 ll �r� MMEM. ll M MMM I II City of Trinidad (CO) Andrew is serving as project manager for a comprehensive water and wastewater rate study for the City of Trinidad (City). Separate water and wastewater financial planning models were developed to evaluate current and potential funding sources to support each utility operation over the next five to ten years. The City's revenue requirements are increasing due to inflation, increased cost of deferred replacements, and capital facility requirements to maintain capacity to serve current and future customers. Raftelis is proposing multiple changes to both the City's water and sewer rate structures while increasing annual revenues 50% and 40% respectively. One-time plant investment fees are also proposed to increase as part of the study finding and recommendations. The City is evaluating the proposed rates anticipating some adjustments to be implemented in 2023. Specialties Utility rate, and municipal financial plan, cost -of -service, impact fee, activity -based fee, rate consulting services and for local governments. Impact fee studies including those under different legislative guidance in Colorado, Arizona, Utah, & Montana Financial and bond feasibility consulting services for water, sewer, reclaimed, & stormwater utilities Professional History Raftelis: Senior Manager (2019 - present); Manager (2014-2018); Senior Consultant (2013) Red Oak Consulting: Principal Management & Utility Rate Consultant (2003-2013) Ajilon Finance: Telecommunications Analyst (2002-2003) ISPhone Inc. & Appia Communications: Finance & Accounting Administrator (1999- 2001) McLagan Partners: Compensation Analyst Intern (1998, 1999) Education • Bachelors in Business Administration, Finance & Accounting - University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (1999) Certifications • Series 50 Municipal Advisor Representative Professional Memberships ® Growth & Infrastructure Consortium Board of Directors Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District No. 1 (CO) Andrew served as project manager for annual projects with the Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District No. 1 (WWSD) to provide financial plan, cost of service, tap fee, and rate design services since 2018. Raftelis has assisted the District complete this annual update since 2013 consisting of comprehensive cost of service model that was used uuR U °m•uu , „s in the redesign of WWSD's rate structure. Three presentations to the District Board were facilitated by Andrew to obtain direction cumulating in the public hearing and adoption of study findings and recommendations. Fort Morgan (CO) Andrew served as project manager for an initial 2017 water and wastewater financial planning, rate, and fee study and a similar 2021 update. The separate studies evaluated financial plans over a 10 -year planning period with prioritized capital projects incorporated into a baseline financial plan. Raftelis worked with City staff to evaluate the impact of cash, external debt, and grant funded improvements as well as inflation -adjusted operating expenses to identify annual rate revenue adjustments and impacts to customers. At the completion of each study, findings and recommendations are presented to the City Council for review, discussion, and refinements documented within a study report. The City adopted a series of multi -year increases following each study. Idaho Springs (CO) Andrew served as project manager for multiple studies completed for the City of Idaho Springs (City). Raftelis completed an initial water and wastewater financial plan and tap fee update for the City in 2016. Subsequent updates were completed in 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2021 with City Council implementing rate adjustments at the completion of each study. The City's sewer revenue requirements increased following completion of a wastewater treatment plant capital facility improvements. Water revenue requirements were projected to increase to fund a variety of prioritized capital improvements including capacity additions, replacements, and redundancy requirements, As part of each study, separate water and wastewater financial planning models were developed and then updated to evaluate current and potential funding sources to support each utility operation over a six -year planning period including future adjustments necessary to fund operations and the annual capital project requirements (including regulatory driven and capacity expansion improvements) and maintain a financially viable utility. A cost -of -service evaluation was then completed for each utility in 2019. At the completion of each study, findings and recommendations are presented to the City Council for review, discussion, and refinements. Raftelis assisted the City complete an open house and facilitate multiple public hearings and Council discussions. Town of Jackson (WY) Andrew served as Project Manager for 2020 comprehensive water and wastewater rate and tap fee study. As part of the study, Andrew helped facilitate seven meetings with a Citizen Rate Committee (CRC). The CRC was group of local stakeholders tasked with assisting Raftelis and Town staff develop alternatives for consideration by the Town Council. The last comprehensive study was completed in 2002 and Raftelis evaluated a variety of capital funding and rate recovery strategies in support of Town's goals and objectives. Separate stakeholder meetings, public hearings and Town Council presentations were also completed in July through October 2020 led by Andrew and Town staff. City of Grand Junction (CO) Andrew served as project manager for an Internal Services Fee Assessment Study in 2018 for the Joint Persigo Board. As part of the Study, Raftelis interviewed City staff in various General Fund departments including City Manager's Office, City Attorney, Human Resources, City Clerk, Finance, Community Development, Public Works, Fleet, and Communications. The results of the study were a model to equitably allocate General Fund service costs benefiting the City's wastewater fund. Andrew presented findings to the Joint Persigo Board resulting in unanimous approval of study recommendations. St. Vrain Sanitation District (CO) Andrew served as project manager for a financial plan, cost of service, impact fee, and rate study completed for the rapidly growing sanitation district. As part of the study, a policy evaluation of how residential and non-residential customers are assessed rate per equivalent residential unit was evaluated. A key outcome of the study was guidance on the financial and customer rate impacts of several capital funding and financing options for construction of the next wastewater treatment plant expansion. Recommended rate and impact fee adjustments were presented to the District Board covering a 5 -year period of 2018 through 2022 implemented by the District. Raftelis worked with the District in 2020 to review updates to District impact fees as anticipated capital improvement project costs associated with a planned wastewater treatment plant expansion were revised with increased costs. Mt. Crested Butte Water and Sanitation District (CO) Andrew served as Project Manager for multiple water and wastewater financial plan, plant investment fee and rate studies completed for the District in 2016 and 2018. The Mt. Crested Butte Water and Sanitation District serves residential and non-residential customers as part of the Crested Butte Ski Resort as well as residential and commercial customers nearby. Separate water and wastewater financial planning models were developed to evaluate current and potential funding sources to support each utility operation over the next ten years including future adjustments necessary to fund operations and the annual capital project requirements and maintain a financially viable utility. This information was updated in 2018 as the District CIP was updated. A cost -of -service evaluation was then completed for each utility as part of the 2018 study. The results of the cost -of -service and financial planning tasks were integrated into developing water and wastewater rate structure alternatives. The plant investment fees were also updated during both studies. The findings and recommendations were presented to the District Board and summarized in a report issued at the completion of each study. Electronic copies of models created as part of the study were delivered to the District for their use. Andrew also led efforts as part of a separate study to evaluate historical revenues and expenses assessed to a residential sub -District of the Meridian Lake Park (MLP) which joined the District and is assessed an additional surcharge. The District has financed improvements for MLP infrastructure dating back to the mid 1990's when MLP became a sub -region within the District service area and continuing through recent investments in facilities in recent years and planned investments anticipated to be required. This study included an evaluation of the historical proportion of District expenditures benefiting only MLP as well as shared investments benefiting District and MLP customers compared to base and surcharge revenues assessed to MLP customers to determine the balance "owed" by MLP customers to other District customers. The results of this study were documented in a study report presented to the District Board and as part of a facilitated discussion with MLP representatives in October 2019. MLP and District are evaluating options to resolve this multi -year disagreement and evaluating alternative paths forward with the Raftelis study as a baseline documenting the historical balance. City of Thornton (CO) Andrew served as project management for separate comprehensive water and wastewater utility financial planning, cost of service, connection fee and rate studies to be completed for the City in early 2021. The water utility study is evaluating the revenue needs to support the construction of the Northern Project as the City reinvests in infrastructure to support anticipated growth. As part of this study, Raftelis evaluated innovative approaches to recover the cost of water and sewer infrastructure from new development through one-time connection fees providing for scalable residential water fees by lot size and updating multi -family connection fees consistent with the impact to City utilities. Raftelis developed a long-range financial plan completing multiple capital funding scenario in support of anticipated debt issuances to fund capital expansions and improvements. Andrew served as project director for a 2019 study looking at the City's current policies regarding the formation and governance of metropolitan districts. This effort looked specifically at a number of existing districts and compared IIIR' U""°'1"IIIPIII , 9 1(5 current and projected residential tax burdens to those of properties located in the City but not within a district. Raftelis also compared City metropolitan district policies to those of several other Colorado communities. The overall intent of this study was to provide the City Council and staff with information to assist in the potential revision to City policies concerning the formation of districts and most importantly the ability of the district, once formed, to issue debt and increase property tax rates for district residents. Andrew served as financial lead for a 2018 stormwater feasibility study for the City to provide for an equitable method to recover operating and capital costs from customers, providing a predictable and sustainable funding source We assisted the City in refining a 10 -year financial plan and revenue requirements analysis, including capital improvement and capital funding scenarios and analysis. Findings and recommendations were documented in a study report and presented to the City Council for consideration, including implementation issues regarding billing options, billing system maintenance, and customer outreach and communication options for implementation. III;11A1,"" "IIII'dlll DES "'1'2° )11 ANALYST Consultant Lundyn will work at the direction of Todd in conducting analyses and preparing deliverables for the project. III "III��nNrIII III II I VI II°w Lundyn is a Consultant in the Austin branch. She is aiding and learning from the other members of the team. Prior to her role at Raftelis, Lundyn was a consultant through her master's program at Louisiana State University and gained experience working with clients, data, and deadlines. With a bachelor's degree in actuarial science and a master's degree in Analytics, she is looking forward to gaining subject matter expertise in this industry and using her previous skills to become a trusted advisor and deliver lasting solutions. KIII ' III � III 'M�i� I II �'��'°ff II I ° III '� III i III III W'�l�� I II Specialties • Data Analysis • Forecasting • Time Series Analysis Professional History • Raftelis: Consultant (2023 -present); Associate Consultant (2020-2022) • National Insurance Company - Consultant (2020) • Statewide Community College Association- Consultant (2020) Education • Bachelor of Science in Actuarial Science- Louisiana State University (2020) • Master of Science in Analytics- Louisiana State University (2021) Professional Memberships • AWWA: Texas Section City of Pueblo (CO) Lundyn updated the City of Pueblo's 10 -year financial planning model and billing data analysis. Additionally, Lundyn assisted in completing an EPA financial capacity assessment to identify the impact of base and additional capital and operating requirements on residential customer bills to median income and related community -wide metrics of financial capacity. City of Aspen (CO) To assist the utility in tracking revenues and usage, Lundyn created an excel based data model that automates billing data analysis with the appropriate outputs from discussion with staff. The City of Aspen staff can readily drop data into excel, click a button, and the data model automatically analyzes consumption and revenue patterns. Additionally, Lundyn is the staff consultant for an upcoming Water and Electric Rate Study. Perry Park (CO) As a staff consultant, Lundyn completed the billing data analysis and created a financial planning model with various scenarios to ensure that the utility was able to meet the forecasted operating and capital expenditures. National Insurance Call Center (2020) Lundyn served as a consultant to assist client in determining internal variances in their call metrics (i.e frequency and duration) following the Stay -At -Home order in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, as a consultant she used her skills to statistically compare a baseline of 2.5 years of historical call data to the first six months data of work -from -home inbound, outbound, and internal (extension to extension) call data to find descriptive differences in terms of call frequency and duration. Using the pre- and post -Stay -at -Home order metrics, as well as calculating uu;u; U .m•uu s the fixed and variable costs of the Cost Centers, the consultants were able to conclude visuals for change in Cost Center frequency, duration, and cost as well as the efficiency of the fixed cost of a cost center in relation to the variable cost. Statewide Community College Association (2020) Consulted the clients in identifying areas of improvement for the course scheduling process (i.e classroom efficiency, course times, course retention, course success rate, advising. etc) for students. The analysis aims to increase overall efficiency of the college and success of students. City of Fair Oaks Ranch (TX) Raftelis was engaged by City of Fair Oaks Ranch to conduct a water and wastewater cost -of -service. Lundyn supported financial planning, cost -of -service, and rate design for the project, as well as analyzing the data given by the city. City of Addison (TX) Raftelis was engaged by Addison, TX to conduct a financial planning study to provide the Town with proposed water and sewer rate based on the forecasted 7 -year period (FY 2022-2028). The analysis evaluates the validity of the previous forecast, and add additional features to a model to allow the Town to consider timing options for projects. City of Manor (TX) Raftelis was engaged by the City of Manor to conduct a water and wastewater cost -of -service study that will consider water and wastewater rates. As staff consultant, Lundyn is completing the fiscal year 2022 update. City of Seattle (WA) Raftelis was engaged by Seattle, WA to create a long-term water demand forecast that considers demographic, weather, and economic scenarios to help plan for the future. A variety of time series and regression forecasts will be designed to forecast future water demand levels for Seattle. City of Huntsville (TX) Raftelis was engaged by Huntsville to conduct a water and wastewater cost -of -service and financial planning study. As staff consultant, Lundyn compiled the model and led the billing data analysis. City of Robinson (TX) Raftelis is performing a water and wastewater rate study for the City of Robinson. Lundyn is lead analyst, completing the cost of service and developing the rate design alternatives and financial plan. Alexandria Renew Enterprises (VA) Lundyn aids in project management for a billing and customer service transition coordination project with Alexandria Renew Enterprises (AlexRenew). She collaborates with AlexRenew's staff and an outsourced CSS provider to implement the replacement of their existing system. IP II I III°' "°ff • Oklahoma City (OK) - Financial Plan and Rate Design Study • Round Rock (TX) — Financial Plan and Rate Design Study • Arlington (TX) — Financial Plan and Rate Design Study �, rllfi; TI , ,,, U11.111 „!" ANALYST Consultant Matthew will work at the direction of Todd in conducting analyses and preparing deliverables for the project. III "III�tnNrIII III II I VI II°w Matthew is a consultant with Raftelis who, in both his academic and professional career, has specialized in data analysis from both a quantitative and qualitative perspective. Prior to joining Raftelis in 2021, he worked at Orion Advisor Services managing client databases. His academic program was heavily focused on statistics and machine learning models, as well as Excel. Since joining Raftelis, Matthew has served as an associate consultant on numerous water and wastewater utility projects involving financial planning, cost of service, connection fees, and impact fees. II�III �°�"" III1'llli���i�lll �� ffY" II I oolll � lll i�°'�III�i6; lll lll IIW��Ii�lll �; City of Fort Morgan (CO) Staff consultant on a comprehensive 10 year financial plan for the City of Fort Morgan, which includes water and wastewater. We updated the existing rates to put the city in a better position to cover upcoming debt service obligations. fly Specialties • Strategic planning • Data analysis • Microsoft Excel Financial modeling Professional History • Raftelis: Consultant (2023 -present); Associate Consultant (2021-2022) • Orion Advisor Services: Financial Data Analyst (2019-2021) • Livelo, Your Global Bike: Product Management Intern (2019) • Creighton University Athletic Department: Athletic Development Intern (2016-2020) Education • Bachelor of Science in Business Administration: Business Intelligence and Analytics (2020) Professional Memberships • AWWA: Rocky Mountain Section City of Evans (CO) Matthew assisted project managers with developing new impact fees for the police department in Evans, CO. A new police headquarters being built called for a change in impact fees and we determined a unit cost based on square footage of the new space and the city's functional population. Town of Mead (CO) Matthew assisted project managers in developing a 10 year water and wastewater financial plan as well as developing impact fees for their wastewater system. The Town had major industrial customers connecting to their wastewater system which required a deeper look into their existing impact fees. The hybrid methodology was chosen to capture the existing capacity of the system as well as account for the need to expand their treatment plant within the study period. Matthew along with the project managers made sure the impact fee reflected the services provided and the unit cost of facilities for the new industrial connections. City of Norman (OK) Matthew assisted project managers with updating connection fees for the city of Norman. We developed three impact fee alternatives based on potential future sources of supply to present to council. Based on their situation, we used a hybrid approach for the fees to account for the existing system as well as the growth costs that new connections bring to the utility. III0' U""" "111111111 9 20 City of Avondale (AZ) In Progress Matthew is assisting project managers in developing water and wastewater impact fees for the City of Avondale. He is working on valuing the existing system based on the asset listing, determining the unit cost of capacity, and calculating the fee with the hybrid methodology. II I II 1111„„F III VAIIP'ai fff I II 111',,,t, III II Si,S I II 0 111',1A III II : III ° I II II II I 111E1114 II I '°w Orion Advisor Services (2019-2021) Orion Advisor Services is a financial tech firm based out of Omaha, NE. Matthew worked as a financial data analyst, managing a range of client databases, and assisting them with any database related problems. He gained valuable experience working with financial data and running analysis on large datasets. III;9; U"".11.IIII1nul slip1 1114 YfIrr fff 111 11 11, E1111111111111 11 11 1, 111 11 fff Raftelis employs several management strategies to heighten the effectiveness and efficiency of the services we provide to our clients. We place a high priority on being responsive to our clients and, as we determine scope and staffing for each project, we carefully consider our workload and the availability of resources to meet client needs and project schedules. Each week, the Raftelis management team participates in a conference call to review the number of consulting hours required to meet the needs of our clients during the upcoming week. This weekly meeting allows our project managers to deploy our consulting staff in a flexible manner that ensures a suitable level of hours will be devoted to the Town even during periods of accelerated deadlines and heavy work requirements. Our project management conference calls provide Raftelis project managers with opportunities to effectively distribute work within a project. However, it is equally important that consulting hours spent on the project are tracked and compared to project budgets in real time. Raftelis uses project management software to monitor project progress, consulting hours, and budgets. Rigorous and complicated projects like the one the Town of Fraser is considering require a robust project delivery system designed by experts in project management and navigation of public processes. We've outlined some of our key project management delivery protocols below that will ensure a successful project: Work plan development and major elements/milestones Raftelis begins each project with a standard process wireframe shell that is built on two key foundational pillars: • Best practices from the American Water Works Association's MI Manual, and • Similar past successful Raftelis projects. Viewed as a starting point, this wireframe gets built out and customized based on the project's scope and the client's unique needs. At the kick-off meeting, a high-level draft workplan including key project milestones, will be presented to Town staff. Feedback will be collected then, adjustments will subsequently be made, with a draft -final work plan provided for the entire project team. The following is a partial list of major workplan components projects such as this one typically include (but by no means are limited to): • Initial data request tracking • Resource loaded schedule and progress tracker through course of project • Data validation, stress testing and analysis • Rate survey • Financial plan development with supporting data feeds • Plant investment fee analysis • Cost -of -Service analysis (W&WW) • Rate design analysis • Rate technical memorandum • Rate model development • Draft and final Rate Study report development • Draft and final Rate Study presentation development and delivery IIIRAU""1111H„„1:15 22 Adaptive work plan that addresses contingencies Nimble. Flexible. Adaptable. Those are three adjectives we hear clients use to describe our performance on projects at end -of -study project close-out meetings. Quality rate studies require multiple inputs from a wide variety of sources. They require careful analysis of data that is of varying quality and reliability. They often reveal information that leads clients to request additional analysis that may not have been in the original scope. They are at times subject to public and political pressures, and the list goes on. Our processes and work plans are custom-built for each client but never locked in stone. Working in concert with our client, we regularly adjust plans when warranted to adapt to new information and ensure the project achieves its stated goals. IIIRAU""11111RAS Project Understanding Like many utilities on the Western Slope, the Town continues to experience steady growth. This growth requires expanding water and wastewater systems, all while maintaining existing infrastructure. Couple those challenges with rapidly increasing costs of supplies and materials, Town will see continued upward pressure on rates. The Town has two pending projects on the State's Drinking Water Revolving Fund (DWRF) and the Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund (WPCRF) 2023 Intended Use Plans for proposed loan and grant funding. These projects consist primarily of a water treatment plant expansion and a wastewater treatment plant expansion. The total anticipated costs for these projects are $18.25 million and $12.75 million, respectively. The loan payments on each of these projects could easily reach $1.0 million per year — which represents a significant portion of total operating and non -operating revenue for each utility. The Town has initiated with RFP to develop a framework for financial sustainability while meeting the needs of new development and maintaining existing infrastructure. To meet these needs, the Town is requesting: • A financial plan which shows the ability of rates and fees to fund operations, capital, any proposed debt service, reserves, and debt service coverage • A cost of service and rate analysis that demonstrates an equitable distribution of costs between customer classes and that rates are set to recover those costs • Rate design alternatives that promote the Town's specific pricing objectives, such as sustainability, wise water use and efficiency, and equitable cost recovery • Plant investment fees which capture the appropriate cost to serve new development and minimize the burden of growth -related costs on existing customers • A stress test of the rate alternatives through bill impact comparison among a variety of usage levels and a comparison of proposed bills and rates to that of peer utilities in the area • Final recommendations that are easy to understand, and implement and will be durable over the next 5 to 10 years. IIICVk a IIV' .'Y�Y.'lllllllll� VVE� ii�` u'W. Project Approach We have tailored our approach to accomplish what we believe will result in a successful outcome to ensure the Town's future financial viability of its utilities. Our approach for the water and wastewater utilities is summarized in the graphic below followed by a narrative on the following pages describing our process. Project Kick Off/Data Gathering 1-2 weeks Validate the cursory research we've already conducted and collect other pertinent data. Spend time listening to you, and understanding the needs and constraints. Understand from staff perspective "What defines a successful project?" Hold kick-off meeting with Town staff to finalize study, develop Project Charter and rate structure pricing objectives requirements Documented goals and objectives for the study, including a listing of key performance metrics and a range of acceptable results for each. Development Fee/Financial Forecast 4-8 weeks Cost of Service Rate Design Approval Process 111011•1111111IIIIIIIIIII Il llllllrl Ilfrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 4-8 weeks 4-8 weeks Varies / TBD uum i »uulu » r u u i » �i i�iu m u u i»u»imrm � JNl�1111111J111J1, NJIJJJJJJJIJJJJJ11111111111111J111 ! ;11111 JJJJJIJJIJI 1111111111, 111111111,11!l111111J11J111111JJJJJJJJJJJJ 1111,11 1111111) iIII�IIIIIIIf��rlllli�Il�rIIIII�i111111���7111���III�II�I�II���III��II�rrrill�III��IrIiIIII��irrIIII��IrIII���JIIIiiII�II�IIIII�iIIIi�IIII�II�iIIrI�IJIIIrIIIII�Irr�IIII�I��IIrI�I�I�II�IJIIII�iII������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Calculate development fees first as they are an input to the financial planning process. Develop demand forecast by class. Calculate development fees, rate revenues, and project revenues over study period for each utility. Project O&M costs, existing and proposed debt, and grants. Develop financial planning models to evaluate different approaches to funding the CIP varying the level of debt, cash, project timing. Project meetings Baseline financial planning model with easily updated links to cost -of -service and rate design modules. Interactive sessions to evaluate financial plan scenarios and rate design alternatives Allocate costs from the financial plan to develop the equitable distribution of costs between classes. Develop cost of service and rate design options based on pricing objectives identified in the kick-off meeting. Staff & Raftelis consultations to evaluate the analyses and develop viable options for further consideration and testing with stakeholders. Develop rates that recover cost of service and meeting pricing objectives. Create various bill impacts to demonstrate how individual customers will be affected. Present options to Staff and/or stakeholders to gauge their preferences and feedback. Finalize rate structure alternatives. Prepare presentation materials and documentation necessary for Board consideration. Make Council presentations and follow-up presentations as needed to obtain approval. Prepare preliminary, draft, and final reports. Up to 2 meetings with Board or Council. II�II�I�JJJJJJ�JJ ,I I I I Ill 1�111J�J1111)1111��11�11�11����11���11f I�Illilllll�i��illlli lll�Ilii«<�i««ii««rr«««<r« Cost -of -service analysis which shows the cost to provide service to customer classes. A documented indication of stakeholder preferences. Narrow the alternatives to 2-3 best based on feedback received. Board meetings presenting results. Board selection of the preferred option for implementation. Final report documenting all findings and recommendations. 1111;1111:AU""1111111R.US 8d !' Project Management This task provides a solid foundation for the project. During the kick-off meeting, all aspects of the project will be discussed, including the primary objectives of the Town, final deliverables, and ongoing project management. In addition, Raftelis will lead a workshop on pricing objectives and rate setting in order to gain a clearer understanding of what the Town would like to achieve through its rate structure. We will prepare separate financial forecasts, cost of service, rate design, and plant investment fee analysis for each utility. Financial Analysis, Cost of Service and Rate Design Plant Investment Fee Development fees are an input to the financial plan, so we proposed to complete this prior to the financial plan forecast. We will complete a full valuation of the Town's water and wastewater system and deteiiiiine the methodology which best represents to cost to provide service to new development. We will follow the Colorado statutes 29-20-104.5 and the principles from the pinnacle Colorado Supreme County case Krupps v. Breckenridge. Our evaluation will consider the three primary methodologies used in calculating development fees. The selection of a methodology should consider a utility's goals and objectives for recovering capacity -related capital costs. The three methodologies include buy -in, incremental, and hybrid. The figure below lists the basic parameters that a utility may consider when selecting a methodology that best meets their needs. Figure 1: Industry -Accepted Development Fee Methodologies Description Buy -in Incremental Hybrid Available existing capacity sufficient to accommodate new growth No existing capacity with significant future capacity requirements Some existing capacity available with future capacity requirements needed to accommodate new growth X X X X Customer Billing Data We will analyze customer billing information to classify customers and project user demand and revenues over the planning period. Using this historical data and growth projections from the master plan, we will forecast demands and corresponding rate revenue for the study period. Raftelis will develop various scenarios each varying the changes in use per account and different growth projections resulting in an optimistic projection, pessimistic projection, and most likely projection. Raftelis will also examine the Town's current customer classifications and identify any changes that may be necessary to make them more consistent with current industry practices and standards. We will then calculate the revenues under current rates at projected consumption levels (optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely) to understand the potential revenues realizable. We will then compare these revenues to the revenue requirements forecast in the financial plan to understand the magnitude of the potential shortfall under the current rates. Financial Planning A primary consideration in developing an `optimal' financial plan is minimizing annual revenue increases through balancing the use of reserves, existing rate revenue, and state loans. This balance is subject to the constraints of meeting the Town's target reserve policies and debt service coverage requirements on any proposed debt. This approach is an iterative process. For example, issuing debt to fund a capital project may keep revenue increases low however, new debt payments may decrease the coverage below the target level. As a result, a revenue increase may be needed to meet to maintain compliance with the target. The revenue generated from the increase now may meet debt service coverage and produce an ending balance more than the target reserve. This excess can be used to partially fund the capital project which, in turn, could reduce the proposed state loan amount. The financial planning task will include the development of forecasted revenues, O&M, debt service, and capital expenditures along with project bond or loan issues with any rate increases required to meet these requirements and financial metrics through the study period. We will create separate financial plans for each utility. The graphic below illustrates the requirements needed to build a sound financial plan. Figure 2: Financial Planning Process unuanaa iha0 DMA • Rate revenue projections • Other income • OpEx/CapEx Budget • Customer growth • OpEx inflation • CapEx inflation • Changes in usage patterns r3):,3 n Ildh V' ihlli aalo;�,�a • Operating reserve • Capital reserve • Debt service coverage • Other fiscal policies I°n'ipaapp»11,nll IN'all4a I"aa)rxaaar na0; • Rate revenue • Other operating revenue • Operating expenses • Capital expenditures • Existing debt service • Transfers APIIkUY "»oirn= Eueuuntis • Reserve targets • Debt service coverage requirements • Funding options uinpxV'ui IIaev iluie Adjust rit s • Equal annual • As -needed • Staggered nn1naaPala ll @'alfaairn „w Ifv°a:aau G°ae ,8 121 unanPala lf dal[ ain nunaonauavI Pia In Cost of Service Raftelis will start with industry -accepted cost -of -service principles and customize our analysis to account for the specific requirements of this study. The cost -of -service analysis will provide the Town with a defensible justification explaining the reason why the costs are assigned in the manner they are. Raftelis need this information to evaluate the level of the current and proposed rates. The cost -of -service analysis is a multi -step process. For water, it includes determining the revenue requirement, assigning the revenue requirement to various facilities (functional areas), and further allocating those costs to system parameters based on their design criteria or function in the system (e.g. water utility - average and peak demands, customers and billing). Those costs are then distributed to customer classes based on their water demands as well as accounts or equivalent meters. Raftelis will use the cost allocation process based on the industry standard methodologies published in the AWWA's Manual MI, Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges and the Water Environment Federation's Manual of Practice M27, Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems. The figure below illustrates the four primary steps we will use to complete the cost -of -service analysis for the water utility. The wastewater utility will follow a similar approach. iFirA """ "IIII''illl E 21 Figure 3: Water Cost of Service Framework Step 1: Step 2: Step 3: Step 4: Step 5: Determine the Functionalize Revenue Allocate Costs to Calculate Class Units of Distribute Costs to Revenue Requirement Requirement to Demand and Customer Service Customer Classes System Facilities Characteristics • Operation and * Average day • Potable maintenance • Source of supply * Average day demand demands, gpd • Single family expense • Water treatment costs • Peak demands, gpd • Duplex • Rate -funded capital plant • Peak demand costs • Meters and services, • Multifamily • Debt service • Pumping • Meters and services equivalent meters • Commercial payments • Treated storage and costs • Billing, number of • Non -potable • Less: non -rate distribution • Billing costs bills revenues • Non -potable • Non -potable costs • Non -potable facilities demands, gpd • Meter and services • Billing Rate Design As noted previously, the process of developing rate structure alternatives will be based on pricing objectives identified by Town staff. A critical element of the rate design process is the analysis of customer bill impacts under each alternative rate structure. We will calculate bill impacts across a range of customer demands (low, medium, and high) as well as the average monthly change for each customer. This will ensure that Town staff and the Town Board are fully informed regarding which customers will experience high bill impacts. The third figure below illustrates the rate design process. Like the financial planning and cost -of -service process the rate design process is iterative, and through the iterations, rates are refined to best meet the Town's pricing objectives. The graphic below summarizes the rate structure development process. Figure 4: Rate Design Process Finalize financial plans and the total system revenue requirement from rates Design volumetric rates and monthly fixed charges in order to: Estimate customer class cost of service via the cost of service study process • Recover the class revenue requirement • Achieve City public policy and financial objectives Comprehensive customer bill impact analysis Meetings and Presentations On -Site Project Meetings This study will require several touch points along the way and the proposed on -site project meetings will be key to ensuring successful and timely project delivery. We will prepare materials in advance of each meeting and to the extent possible provide key information ahead of the meeting for staff to review. We will follow up with project meeting notes and share that with Staff — making sure we captured the salient points of the conversations. IIIRAU""111111Huulti 28 Board of Trustee Meetings We have included two Board presentations in our scope of work. The first meeting is typically an informational session about the rate study. The second meeting will be the presentation of preliminary results. These presentations and presentations to other stakeholders are of critical importance to the study. A maligned presentation could put the entire project in jeopardy. Our project manager has several years of experience presenting complex material to Councils and Board across Colorado and the US. Our approach to presentations is to develop a narrative that provides the Board with the key information needed to make an informed decision. Too much information and detail and the messaging will get lost in translation; too little information and the Board will lack context and the inability to make a sound decision. Reports Raftelis views the development of a detailed and fully transparent study report as a critical objective of the cost -of - service study and rate design process. The study report serves as a "legacy" document that will serve as a reference for guiding the utility future financial sufficiency. We will memorialize the assumptions, calculations, findings and conclusions of the study into a draft rate report for the Town's review and comment. We will incorporate feedback and changes into a final report for the Town's records. Scope of Work We have developed the following scope of services based on our extensive experience in completing similar studies in Colorado and in the Western Slope. The scope has been tailored to address the specific objectives and concerns identified in the RFP while maintaining those elements that we believe are essential for a successful project. Task 1: Project Initiation and Project Management Work Plan Activities This task sets the stage for efficient and effective project execution through understanding the Town's perspective and what they value in a successful project. • Project Management • Provide timely invoices, regular calls with the Town's project manager, and identify milestones and deliverables. • Project Initiation Meeting • Provide data requests in advance of the project initiation meeting. •Review prior Town rate models before the meeting. • Schedule conference call to review and clarify data request items. •Discuss other policy objectives that may affect the study (e.g., reserve policies, debt coverage requirements, etc.). •Review rate model functional requirements with staff. • Pricing Objectives Workshop (held during project initiation meeting) • Conduct a pricing objectives workshop with Town staff to better understand the objectives of current rate structures and critical issues that should be considered in the development of alternative rate designs. • Establish criteria for each objective in which to measure the ability of each structure to meet the objectives. III;9; U"". .IIIIIIIII E • Prepare rate structure alternatives that align with the selected objectives. Rate structure alternatives will be evaluated in Task 4. b� II If II ID IRA II 1 IL.... II • On -site kick-off meeting with Town Staff. • Technical Memorandum summarizing results and action items from Kick-off meeting. • Pricing objectives workshop. • Technical memorandum summarizing results of pricing objectives workshop. Task 2: Water and Wastewater Customer Usage Analysis Work Plan Activities This task is the basis for developing accurate revenue projections and cost allocation between the various customer classes. • Analyze historical billed water consumption by meter size and by customer class. Tally the number of bills by customer class and calculate the average use per bill. • Complete a water bill frequency for the residential and commercial showing the percentage of bills and volume included in the minimum charge and in excess of the minimum charge. This will be used the revenue projections developed in Task 3. • Complete a wastewater bill frequency for the commercial showing the percentage of bills and volume included in the minimum charge and in excess of the minimum charge. This will be used the revenue projections developed in Task 3. • Conduct water and volume sensitivity analysis to develop optimum sales projections scenarios. ID 11111111, 111„„„ 111 V IIE R%y 113 11.E, • Customer water class demand characteristics and wastewater flow characteristics used to develop revenue projections and rate design alternatives. • Technical memorandum summarizing results of water demand and bill frequency analysis. Task 3: Water and Wastewater Development Fees Work Plan Activities This task will ensure that new development funds their share of system needs thereby maintaining equity between existing and new customers. We will calculate separate fees for the water and wastewater utilities using the following approach. • Evaluate the water and wastewater system's existing available capacity to serve growth and the capacity anticipated to be added with the 10 -year capital improvement program to determine best methodology for calculating development fees. The basic methodologies include o Buy -in: Historical perspective. Existing available capacity with nominal future growth. o Incremental: Forward -looking. Little to no capacity available with large expansions projects in the new future. o Hybrid: Combination of buy -in and incremental. Some existing capacity available with future expansion projects anticipated in the near future. • Calculate the current value of available capacity and planned growth -related costs. We will evaluate the valuation of existing assets: o Value of existing system facilities at current replacement costs using Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI) or other similar construction -related index o The unit replacement cost of the water system's backbone facilities (treatment plant. Large transmission mains, pump stations, treated storage, etc.). For the incremental method, identify growth -related projects with assistance from Town staff. • Estimate the remaining capacity in existing facilities and capacity to be added with future facilities (e.g. growth -related CIP). • Apply adjustments such as developer contributions and outstanding loans currently paid through rates. • Determine the remaining existing capacity and future capacity to be added for the water system. Estimate buildout land use categories and parcel square footage. • Establish peak demand basis for a single family equivalent (SFE). • Prepare a development fee survey of peer communities for use in the final presentation to the Town Council. II a 1E, If II II I1. II S • Technical memorandum summarizing results of development fee analysis. • Peer survey of plant investment fees. Task 4: Water and Wastewater 10 -Year Financial Plan Work Plan Activities This task lays the groundwork for creating a long-term financial roadmap to meet financial goals. This will assist the Town with proactive planning of large capital projects, evaluating various funding options, and balancing those to minimize future revenue adjustments. • Create separate water and wastewater financial plans for the study period from 2023 to 2031. Operating Fund • Forecast revenue under existing (2023) rates using the demands projections developed in Task 2, the plant investment fees, and other miscellaneous revenues. • Forecast operations and maintenance (O&M), repair and replacement (R&R) capital, expansion capital (based on master plan results or other engineering reports), and existing and proposed debt service, and projected cost changes in operations . • Identify the projects eligible for bond or state loans based on timing, duration, and the project amount. Raftelis can present financial plan alternatives considering specific projects financed through state loans or grants the Town has secured. • Forecast existing and proposed debt service based on identified capital projects available for bond funding. Financial Plan Optimization • Develop an `optimal' revenue requirement financial plan balancing a mix of cash funding and debt financing capital projects (if applicable) while meeting reserve targets and debt service coverage requirements while maintaining conservative debt capacity levels and minimizing revenue increases. Calculate annual rate revenue adjustments needed through the study period. • Review existing reserve and debt capacity levels and recommend changes based on specific financial risks or upcoming large capital expenditures. • Conduct an on -site meeting to review preliminary results with Town staff. • Update financial plan scenarios based on feedback from Town staff. • Prepare a rate survey of communities for use in the final presentation to Town staff and the Town Council. uu;u, U .m•uu s �� II If III J II IRA II IL.... II • Financial plan alternative cash flows. • On -site meeting with Staff to review and finalize cash flows for use in the cost of service and rate design analysis. • Technical memorandum summarizing results of financial plan analysis. Task 5: Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Work Plan Activities The cost of service analysis will determine each customer class' fair share of cost to provide service. We will use industry standard methodologies and our expertise to develop an equitable distribution of costs. • Water Utility • Determine the test year revenue requirement. • Assign the net book value or replacement cost of existing utility infrastructure to the correct functional categories for the allocation of annual capital costs. Functional categories include: treatment, transmission and distribution, pumping, storage, and fire protection. • Assign test -year capital costs (PAYGO financing and projected debt service), O&M expenses, and non - rate revenue offsets to the correct functional categories. • Allocate test -year capital cost, O&M expenses, and non -rate revenue offsets to the correct demand parameters. Demand parameters include average day demands, peak demands, and customer -related activities such as billing, meters and services, and customer field services. • Determine customer class units of service. Units of service include class average day demands, peak demands, number of bills and number of 3/4" meter equivalents. • Distribute the allocated test -year capital costs, O&M expenses and non -rate revenue offsets to customer classes based on each of their proportionate share of demands, bills and equivalent meters. • Compare the class cost of service to the revenue projected under existing rates for the test -year. This comparison will show the percentage change in the classes based on the cost of service process. • Wastewater Utility • Determine the test year revenue requirement. • Assign the net book value or replacement cost of existing utility infrastructure to the correct functional categories for the allocation of annual capital costs. Functional categories may include: primary treatment, secondary treatment, UV disinfection, headworks, collection system lift stations, etc.. • Assign test -year capital costs (PAYGO financing and projected debt service), O&M expenses, and non - rate revenue offsets to the correct functional categories. • Allocate test -year capital cost, O&M expenses, and non -rate revenue offsets to the correct demand parameters. Demand parameters include contributed flow, infiltration and inflow, strength, and customer -related activities such as billing, meters and services, and customer field services. • Determine customer class units of service. Units of service include class billable flows, infiltration and inflow contributions, strength, and customer. • Distribute the allocated test -year capital costs, O&M expenses and non -rate revenue offsets to customer classes based on each of their proportionate share of demands, bills and equivalent meters. • Compare the class cost of service to the revenue projected under existing rates for the test -year. This comparison will show the percentage change in the classes based on the cost of service process. If III " II RA II ' IL.... II • Draft technical memorandum summarizing assumptions, data sources, and preliminary results of the water and wastewater cost of service analysis. • Conference call with Staff to review water and wastewater cost of service results. • Technical memorandum summarizing the finalized cost of service results based on feedback from Staff. These results will be used in the rate design analysis. IIRAU""111IIIPIII VVE Task 6: Water and Wastewater Rate Design Work Plan Activities This task develops the rate structure and rates required to meet the pricing objectives of the utility and generate sufficient revenue recovery from each customer class. • Using the selected pricing objectives and evaluation metric identified in Task 1, determine the alignment the existing rate structure has with the objectives. Assess the ability of proposed rate structures to align with the evaluation metrics. Rank the existing structure against the alternatives and select 2 or 3 structures to determine test year rates. • Update the current water and wastewater rates with the test year revenue requirement increase. This serves as the baseline for comparison against other rate structures • Based on the rate structure ranking results, develop test year rates for each alternative. Compare results from proposed rates under each structure against the ability to meet ranked pricing objectives • Develop a bill impact table for each customer class which compares typical monthly bills under existing and proposed rate structures, annual bills for typical customers, and an annual bill comparison under the rate alternative and existing rates for each customer in a class summarized to show the number of customers that will annual bill increase or decrease. • Develop a water and wastewater utility bill comparison under the Town's existing and proposed rate alternatives compared against up to 10 peer utilities ID 1E, Ilt„„ IIE IRA. II3 II • Technical memorandum summarizing results of rate design analysis of the existing and proposed rate structure alternatives • On -site meeting with Town staff and other stakeholders to review rate design alternatives, update based on discussions with Staff and finalize the preferred rate alternative Task 7: Board Presentations and Reports Work Plan Activities • Attend one meeting to present findings to the Town Board of Trustees • Prepare a draft summary report of findings and conclusions of the study for staff to review and comment Incorporate comments from the draft report into a final report. Ability to Perform All Aspects of the Project With the depth of 140 consulting professionals, and specifically the current and anticipated workload of the individuals assigned to this project, we have the availability to provide the requested services in a timely and efficient manner to meet the scheduling requirements and objectives of the Town. As a rule, Raftelis operates at a company -wide project utilization of approximately 65% to 75%. This level of utilization, which we expect to continue through the proposed timeline of this project, will provide the project team with ample time to allocate to the Town engagement. Raftelis actively manages the distribution of our staff hours to ensure we allocate the necessary resources to meet the needs of each of our clients. Raftelis' executive and management team participate in a weekly conference call to review the number of consulting hours required to meet the needs of our clients during the upcoming week. This weekly meeting allows our project managers to deploy our consulting staff in a flexible manner that ensures a suitable level of hours will be devoted to each client. We have prepared a draft timeline action items and deliverables for this project. This is based on our past experience with water and wastewater rate studies for utilities of similar size. To meet this timeline we have included an additional analysis to support the project manager. This ensures that resources are available and there is as little disruption to the schedule as possible. Week Action Items Beginning Deliverable 5/1/2023 5/8/2023 5/15/2023 5/22/2023 5/29/2023 6/5/2023 6/12/2023 6/19/2023 6/26/2023 7/10/2023 7/17/2023 Review data request, initialize models Organize data, populate models Develop billing data for revenue projections Start plant investment fee analysis Start cost of service, rate design analysis Draft financial plan, plant investment fees Finalize financial plans, plant investment fees Draft cost of service and rate design Finalize financial plan, PIFs, cost of service and rate design Develop draft report Submit Draft Plan Submittal of Final Plan and PPT for Board presentation Present to Board of Trustees Contract signed data request list to Town Receipt of Town data; initialize models On -site kick-off meeting with Town staff On -site meeting with staff On -site meeting with staff Draft report Draft PPT, On -site meeting Final Plan and PPT On -site Board presentation Relevant Experience 111 11 1 AA 1 11 11 , 11111 AS fffl u VIM ,,,,,,o, fffl iE;%41. ''0 fff 11 1 , '4:31,1 X1 11 11 fff '4 lm; �� ffff 11 11 1 ��"JJ fffl 111 1 2/ "m%JJ 111 1 Rfi 11 111 11 W1. Our staff has assisted more than 1,500 local government agencies and utilities across the U.S., including some of the largest and most complex agencies in the nation. In the past year alone, Raftelis worked on more than 1,200 financial, organizational, and/or technology consulting projects for over 600 agencies in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Canada. Below, we have provided descriptions of projects that we have worked on that are similar in scope to the Town's project. We have included references for each of these clients and urge you to contact them to better understand our capabilities and the quality of service that we provide. • • RAFTELIS HAS PROVIDED FINANCIAL/ ORGANIZATIONALITECHNOLOGY ASSISTANCE TO UTILITIES SERVING MORE THAN 25% OF THE U.S. POPULATION. Raftelis also completes special projects. These include developing low income rates for the electric utility. Currently, we are examining the cost to the utility that solar customer place on their electric system. Energy from solar panels is distributed back into the distribution grid but does not offset peak demands. The current credit to solar customers includes the cost of transmission and generation. We are also examining the cost of supply EV charging stations. Town of Breckenridge CO Kristin Brownson, Assistant Public Works Director 1095 Airport Road, Breckenridge, CO 80424 / P: 970.547.3179 / E: kristinb@townofbreckenridge.com Todd served as the project manager on this engagement. The Town of Breckenridge had not completed a comprehensive rate study in recent years. The Town retained Raftelis to develop a 10 -year financial plan, cost of service, plant investment fees and rate design alternatives. The Town had just completed the construction of a new water treatment facility as well as repairs to the Tarn Dam. The Tarn Dam repairs were unexpected and required the issuance of state loans. The Town also used state loans to fund a portion of the new WTP. These loans and additional O&M expense from the new WTP caused coverage to fall below the SRF targets of 1.1x debt service. Raftelis developed a 10 -year financial plan using unform annual revenue adjustments to avoid rate shock. Raftelis also completed a comprehensive cost of service analysis. The analysis showed nominal changes in each class' responsibility. During this process, the project team met regularly with the Rate Advisory Committee to discuss rate design alternatives to address the objectives set forth by the committee — conservation, affordability, and equity. Raftelis presented over 20 rate structure alternatives. The Town's existing rate structure is a base fee based on the number SFEs, includes a 10,000 gallons volume allowance and a volumetric rate for usage above the 10,000 gallons. The 10,000 gallon minimum scales with the number of SFEs for each customer. The existing commercial rate structure includes a base fee which varies by meter size, includes a minimum which varies by meter size, and a volumetric rate for usage over the minimum. The selected residential rate structure retained the existing components but reduced the minimum threshold to 6,000 gallons and added a second tier for the usage over the minimum The selected commercial rate structure eliminated the base fee and assessed a volumetric rate for all usage. The new rate structures were adopted to be implemented in June 2023 and the rate adjustment was adopted for January 2024. City of Aspen C Reference: Cole Langford, Business Services Manager 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 / P: 970.920.5002 / E: cole.Iangford@cityofaspen.com Raftelis has provided financial consulting service to the City of Aspen since 2010. The City completes comprehensive water and electric cost of service and rate studies approximately every 5 years. Financial planning review and true -ups are completed annually, The cost of service studies include a the development of a long-range financial plan, cost of service analysis, and rate design for each utility. The cost of service analysis for both utilities follows generally accepted industry rate -setting standards. Rates are designed based on the cost of service results. When there are significant changes to a class' cost of service or the fixed or variable component of the rate, the City will transition that change over a 5 -year period. The City's water rate structure is based on Equivalent Capacity Units (ECUs). The fixed charge scales based each customers number of ECUs and the tiered rate structure also scales with the number of ECUs. The electric rate structure follows the traditional residential, small and large commercial customer classes. The residential customer class is a 4 -tiered increasing block structure. Project 7 Water Authority Reference: Adam Turner, Manager 69128 US -50, Montrose, CO 81401 / P: 970.249.5935 / E: aturner247@gmail.com Project 7 Water Authority (Authority) is the only wholesale water provider to the Cities of Montrose, Delta, the Town of Olathe, Tri-County Water Conservancy District, Menoken Water District, Chipeta Water District, and the Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Association The Authority's was source is primarily from the Gunnison River delivered from the Cystal Resevoir through the Gunnison Tunnel to the Authorities Ridgeway Water Treatment Plant. The remainder of water is provided by the Cimarron Ditch. Due to recent fires and the aging infrastructure, the Authority was looking to improve the reliability of the system under emergency conditions. The Authority retained Raftelis to develop ong-range cash flows to show the impacts to rates in building this redundancy project. The redundancy pipeline project totals $120 million which will require significant rate increases. Raftelis is evaluating different funding strategies to minimize the impact to rates and the financial risk to the Authority. The Authority is anticipating the use of WIFIA loans and SRF loans to fund the project. Raftelis is assisting the Authority in securing a credit rating from Fitch through a comprehensive financial plan and using that financial plan to justify the WIFIA and SRF funding needs. The WIFIA loan process is complex and requires meeting several financial metrics. However, the terms of these loans is very flexible. As a result, Raftelis has developed a number of funding options for the Authority's consideration. 1111;b3U""11111R„115 36 C 0 I%„rniira y '�,P / llIffUlr 111(6 1,, °Y a O�O,e i ' r 0 �% This matrix shows a sample of some of the utilities throughout Colorado that Raftelis staff has assisted and the services performed for these utilities. Western Slope utilities are highlighted in yellow. Smaller utilities are underlined. Client Arapahoe County Water and Wastewater Authority Aspen, City of Aurora, City of Bancroft -Clover Water and Sanitation District Bear Creek Water and Sanitation District Berthoud, Town of Boxelder Sanitation District Boulder, City of Breckenridge, Town of Brighton, City of Broomfield, City & County of Canon City Castle Rock, Town of Crestview Water & Sanitation District Denver, City and County of Denver Water Durango, City of Eagle River Water & Sanitation District East Larimer County Water District Eagle, Town of Eaton, Town of Englewood, City of Evans, City of Fort Collins, City of Fort Collins - Loveland Water District Fort Morgan, City of Fruita, City of Golden, City of Grand Junction, City of Greeley, City of Idaho Springs, City of Ken -Caryl Ranch Water & Sanitation District Lakewood, City of Left Hand Water District Littleton, City of Lochbuie, Town of Longmont, City of Louisville, City of Mead, Town of Benchmarking Cost -of -Service Analysis Debt Issuance Report System Development Fees N = I Q w d = o o E 0 a t o = N y f6 r = O a o an 2 co cp oc5 ti �a 0 a� R 1:0 llJ N O _ Z a 0 (1) V) a v a• = d d Y a _ R co /0 f0 LL E a o o ce o: in 0.5 00/0/% 1) 01111e 0 /, O '//(//I6 I 0 0 0 0 OUllllt 0%/%- 0!!/111 0lO1D Oi// 0////% 0!!!li 0 0 rlfJ 0 001111 0110 8 4!/!l! 0 OUII! 41I1/OF 0 0///% 010111 0111111 0 00/%! 0 0 V/A /% 0 G%i 00%0 00111 1011 0 0 '//0%/s 011lllll 0!!llfJr, 0 , 011ll 0 0%/0% 0 0 (111,! //// 0 000;, 0000 01010 001110 00 0 1 // 0 00/1! /G O%/% 8 0010 0//0 llIUO 000 0 10/0 lllUl 0!!l%d' 09/r O%%r OIJIJJr i es 011lllP Ill/+ X111' ) 0 1111" 0/!(l! 0,1„1/„16; 0lIIP 0 011111% «OfJ,r» 0/ll/% OIQIP O CIA 0 0 0 0 0!!!!A» OS 00%%1 0%lI 011101 000 OOlIOr 0/%/%r Of//lll! 00/%// 0%////0 111111!,» 6 0 «flfllli' !011111 (qOr 111111! 0/////% 111111! 0111111 UflJlll' 0%/% 00///%0 0 O // (0» 0/0//%n 010111! OOr o%%%rr 0 0/0111 0, %/l/' • pa 1 (a 0 0%%%lr 0%00 001111,! 8, // 0 li//l!(rr 0%/i; 0%Illlr 110111 01/1111 0 0 10///% 110111 0!, 0 096 00 11100 000 0010; 00 .rl/0, OlUlO J 00 10111! 0 011llllf 11!11 «1l1fP Il 0 0 o • s 0%111 111,1?, '111%111, OIJI,a /////I, r!!!!l» 111 00/% 0 fa 00///// 0%%I OJJJJ 1!!D/!o lll!!r, 111!6 011116 Oflfllli Ec IIRAU""11111R„1:15 3"7 Co 0',,,fn 111° a d 0„i ,;,;, 30 �q: U" Ill 0 Ill Pfi; Ul;,;, &.. This matrix shows a sample of some of the utilities throughout Colorado that Raftelis staff has assisted and the services performed for these utilities. Western Slope utilities are highlighted in yellow. Smaller utilities are underlined. Client Mount Crested Butte Water & Sanitation District Mount Werner Water & Sanitation District Nederland, Town of Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District Platteville, Town of Project 7 Water Authority Pueblo, City of Pueblo Water Pueblo West Metropolitan District Rifle, City of Salida, City of Security Water & Sanitation District South Adams County Water & Sanitation District St. Vrain Sanitation District Steamboat Springs, City of Superior, Town of Thornton, City of Three Lakes Water & Sanitation District Trinidad, City of Triview Metropolitan District Upper Eagle Regional Water Authority Upper Thompson Sanitation District Westminster, City of Woodmoor Water & Sanitation District No. 1 Benchmarking Cost -of -Service Analysis 0/ 8 Ili 0/l0iv System Development Fees 8 /9 Ullllll 'llllll!!r 8 N E50 E 0 0 E w .Q N U oS rn V .E C C to C C l0 ii a flllli (18 01110 U UU0 • X111010 // rlllllll 01'00 0�0 11lUlG • I%llr 0111111 Public Education and Outreach (18 Rate Case Support Rate Structure Development JOm !9U U>l111J1 fa 0/0% 8 0 E 0. 0 > 0 0 N N 0 0 a .9 -o 0-• 0 0 Y W r LL fn co 01/ 0 0%/%/ J!%/II 1!!1111, 011111 h 0U//// 1!%01 001111 011/11 8 U!I! 0%// 11111 Ullllla ollllli 1!il %/rrr, 0 0///0% • (r 01111111 0 1110111 o////% u%//r, UUllll O !1111' Ul/%I /!r a & U1////I! 001111 Ullfllit 0%0%1 !0 «(1/111 0111101 Ul(Illr; UI/////a 0%% Work Samples We have provided a report for a recently completed study for the Town of Jackson, WY. This study was a comprehensive water and wastewater financial plan, cost of service, rate and fee study. It is attached as an Appendix to this proposal titled: Work Sample. uuR °m•uu s 3 s Fees The following table provides a breakdown of our proposed fee for this project. This table includes the estimated level of effort required to complete each task and the hourly billing rates for our project team members. Expenses include costs associated with travel and a $10 per hour technology charge covering computers, networks, telephones, postage, etc. Hours Tasks 1. Project Initiation and Project Management 2. Water and Wastewater Customer Usage Analysis 3. Water and Wastewater Plant Development Fees 4. Water and Wastewater 10 -year Financial Plan In -person Project Total Total Meetings ME TC AR LH MC Labor Expenses 1 2 12 8 8 30 $600 1 6 Total Fees & Expenses $8,090 12 8 26 $260 $6,030 8 1 12 12 33 $330 $7,785 8 1 16 16 41 $710 $9,765 5. Water and Wastewater Cost of Service 8 1 16 8 33 $330 $7,785 6. Water and Wastewater Rate Design 1 8 1 12 10 31 $610 $7,665 7. Board Presentations and Reports 1 1 10 6 6 23 $530 $6,255 Total Meetings / Hours 4 3 60 4 82 68 217 Hourly Billing Rate $375 $295 $295 $200 $200 ME - Melissa Elliott TC - Todd Cristiano AR - Andrew Rheem LH - Lundyn Harrelson MC - Matthew Canfield Total Professional Fees $1,125 $17,700 $1,180 $16,400 $13,600 $50,005 Total Fees Total Expenses Total Fees & Expenses $50,005 $3,370 IIRAU""" "IIIPIII E5 39 Exceptions We request that the Town consider making the following modifications, shown in red below, to the Professional Services Agreement. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns about these modifications. ARTICLE 6.0 - INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE 6.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Fraser, its officers, employees, agents and their insurers, from and against and a14 liability, claims and demands, on account of any injury, loss or damage, including n e claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage which arises out of or is in any manner connected with this Contract or the Work hereunder, to the extent such injury, loss or damage is caused by, or claimed to be caused by, the negligent act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence or other fault of Contractor or any subcontractor of the Contractor, or any officer, employee, or agent of the Contractor or any subcontractor, or any other person for whom Contractor is responsible. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall defend, investigate, handle, respond and provide defense for and defend against any such indemnified liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of Contractor, agrees to pay Fraser or rci . red by Fraser in conrrccti r rt1} arrg� stela 1iab ty; elm groundless, false or fraudulent. This indemnification provision is intended to comply with § 13-21-111.5(6), C.R.S., and shall be read as broadly as permitted to satisfy that intent. 1111;111:M""1"1111111111„„1:15 d11:8 ell Appendix: Work Sample 111111 11111 Puna e r.e ort =TE 1 111 11 11 un m mo 110101010101011% 000000111C s June 1, 2022 Brian Lenz, P.E., Town Engineer Town of Jackson 150 E. Pearl Avenue Jackson, WY 83001 Subject: Comprehensive Water and Sewer Rate and Capacity Fee Study Dear Mr. Lenz: Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (Raftelis) is pleased to provide this Final Comprehensive Water and Sewer Rate and Capacity Fee Study Report (Report) for the Town of Jackson, Wyoming (Town). The Report summarizes the key study findings and recommendations adopted and implemented by the Town in 2021. The major objectives of the study include: • Develop separate water and sewer fund financial plans for the 10 -year Study Period. • Evaluate separate water and sewer rate revenue adjustments for the Study Period necessary to fund annual revenue requirements, maintain adequate cash reserves, and provide appropriate debt service coverage. • Complete a separate water and sewer class cost -of -service analysis using a single (FY 2022) test -year. • Propose water and sewer rates by customer class for FY 2022 effective July 1, 2021. • Complete a comprehensive evaluation of the Town's water and sewer capacity fees, including alternative assessment approaches. • Propose water and sewer capacity fees effective July 1, 2021, with proposed annual adjustments for inflation as reflected within the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index. It has been a pleasure working with the Town. On behalf of the Raftelis team, we thank you, Johnny Ziem, and Kelly Thompson and Nelson Engineering team members Bob Norton and Matt Bowers and Nelson Engineering sub -consultant Alex Norton for their support, data development, insights, interim reviews, and overall assistance as part of the Study. for your their support, data development, insights, interim reviews, and overall assistance provided during this Study. Sincerely, RAFTELIS FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS, INC. Andrew Rheem Senior Manager "aili `N !';, IC;."'11" . II""l'ar vna, u„r, a„ru.uli.m„ ,50 r,auurrv,roncJ 1111 wnr�;,r�rp, a°�xi II`tl n,,rN li �. c:au u n n 2..11,. 2„2„ 2,.3,. 2„4„ STU DY OVIEIRVIIIEW,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 11 6 CII'TIIZIEI�V IRA'TIE COIMIIMIII'T'TIEIE,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, 11 6 RELIANCE ON 'TOWN PROVIDED IDA'TA ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 11 '7 3..U'TIIILIITY BACKGROUND, WATIER USE GROWTH ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,, 11 3..1.. WA'TIEIR SYS'TIEIMI OVERVIEW. ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,, ,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,, 11 3„2„ WA'TIEIR ACCOUIN'TS & BILLED USAGIE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1 ' 3„3„ SIEWIEIR SYS'TIEIMI OVIERVIIEW,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, 1 , 3,.4,. GROWTH ASSUIMIIP'TIIOINS ,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, 21 4,.1,. WA'TIEIR IFUINID FINANCIAL PLAN RESULTS. .24 4„2„ SIEWIEIR IFUINID FINANCIAL PLAN IRIESU ILTS,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 2 k; 5..WA'TIEIR COST-01E-SIEIRVIICIE AINAILYSIIS AND IRA'TIE IRIEC' 5..1.. COS'T•OIF •SIEIRVIICIE ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 32 5.1.1. Overview of the Water Cost -of -Service Process 32 5.1.2. Water Utility FY 2022 Revenue Requirement 33 5.1.3. Customer Class Peaking Factors 33 5.1.4. Results of the COST -OF -SERVICE Study 34 5,.2„ 5.2.1. Existing Rates 35 5.2.2. Rate Structure Alternatives 35 5.2.3. Adopted July 1, 2021, Town Rates 36 6,.SIEWIEIR COST-01E-SIEIRVIICIE AINAILYSIIS AND IRATIE IRIEC MI I IEIRIDA'� 6,.1,. 6.1.1. Revenue Requirements 40 6.1.2. Units of Service 40 6.1.3. Allocation to Cost Components 41 6.1.4. Allocation to Functional Cost Components 41 6.1.5. Unit Cost of Service 42 6,.2„ COSTOF SIEIRVIICIE ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 40 "II" .) ICY 11 ')1 C) II' ' ,.II A 11';,)111:),S :b Il "1f" IOVI II * II " II'kii. 11-11 11':',C INN WA II"' II'kii. II " II ' ' II " II"'k. IIMII II 11),A),!; II II II"' JIJI 117I "'I " 6.2.1. Existing Rates 43 6.2.2. Adopted FY 2022 sewer Rates 43 6..3.. 3 CIRIEIEIK IRA'TIES JULY 1, 2021 ,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, 46 1,. CAIPACIITY IFIEIE ©IESCIRIIIPTIION ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 611 ..2.. CALCULATION IMIETIHIOIDOILOGIIIES ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 511 8.2.1. Buy -In Methodology 51 8.2.2. Incremental Cost Methodology 52 8.2.3. Hybrid Methodology 52 8.2.4. Steps in the Water Capacity Fee Calculation Process 52 ..3.. CAIPACIITY IFIEIE IRIEC MIMIEIIJIDATIION ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, 53 „4„ WA'TIEIR CAIPACIITY IFIEIES ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,, 54 8..5,. WAS'TIEWA'TIEIR CAIPACIITY IFIEIES ,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, 57 .6.. CAIPACIITY IFIEIE CUS'TOIMIEIR IIMIPAC'TS ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 6 9..CAIPACII'TY IFIEIE SUIRVIEY COMIPAIRIISON, "11' OW IN ID I II" „.,11 A CI ORS 11 p, h:A 11 ti ll '° II''w" II I IIIII II II ' N II W A'II" IIIIIII, Ihw" A II M II: III N II R II' d II II , II N D tl;" Al"' A . II Y' Ih VIII II II ID"! :m, II Im �0 2'��� :m, 8Y; n '���m� ull�m.w � III mw �' � m.Vm,µIII�� �� III Ili cite, ur III' � mw ' III� uI �w �� . I '���III. i ����M il���w. III ��� ���Mi � III �i��� ����i ��� � i � .'��� � � '��"M r ���'i� �� ' ' i'�^M .II�i��ii� � III III 1..... � ��� �,V co III � �V III �u � III �. ,� ul ��.��� ul �. ul �� III �.�� M �.� ul ur� 1 ��w�� mm ����w�� ul III �� �u.��.,��� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ^�m� ""„ �.�I .. L. "'��n"' " 1 w'�6"@ ... w., , "'..u ' 1" "W .„ �.m '.m �Ir... ^w., � III III ������� � ���.� ��� ' ����µ III��� ��� 111""""Y. ����� , III �.� III �� ul ������ III ���� ul�l � II I III .+ ���� ul� ' III ohm III �II�. ..,� ul ��,� �.�. u� �� Iii mug III I I II �.� urm�m ' III IIL � m�.�� �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� �� �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� T III IIIe u.4 'm.µll mw ti OF""1111r I II uI ul ul m.mtul()n ul ulllly V 011I ulmmEw 6 .1.. a III° III w� '.� IIC:"" °�" I !,;ewe � ur wm �,I � III' ' . � � �w ' ;.gy m; ..? „; III � II„,mIII�IIIw'w;w � �� ��mwmlll�lmw,�.� 111"""'Y �� I II Il.�w,.muld ntulimlll " mwwW1,„rl l l:o. s 1 aIb:IIIw'w;w 1 d pia" �'.'1 III " 0pwMm m mIIII��'� �rl w� III' �)uI�I III�� ,I'�w ulti�MuI�I�.uIm III II��w�IIII �MIul�mul�w� III�IImu���wl III ��„) 'M 111"""IIC M' w" M �'�Ili '��'�Ili w�i ���'M ���'��i il���o. ���'M w�'� i� i��ipi. u�� 1"�"' . I'��'�Ili f, '��'�Ili r "'M W'. ���Nli d'" �wii ��m.,µIII �.��.�.� III u� �.� . " ul �w.�w.III� �:��� ur I II �' �.u �. �.�uru1�� uwm��III 'ul���III I II �I.�.III III �: Ill w ulurm�.� ulm �: "111�1�I�ulml�� .� „.� 1"is IIIm ., 9 c1.qopliti..9„1 III S 202.2 114R: ^^ ulcl Ilul,mt,uleIII .,II (,'“.murm.. Illm; 'C Y:uo Y.IM ':III °'III 2 'w,„ „ .. : 3�, �,�M,. w p.'M Wale �.� w.. 1,�""' .,�. al�+'�"„ � I III III �. � � ���� ��� � �.�� 111 1 ��w� .� III u� w� m �.� uI��1 ul ^. ul ��.�. III III ��L� ul m,,.� III �� � ul .� III m.,ul ul'.m�m III�.IIL� ��,m.w, � ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� �� �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� „, CaIII IIIE.o '"111 ..09.df.„.)III t.ed III Y ;2022 uI ul IIIe tit I II inu-On111',olf nub Coreek ittioster Velllm.,ulul'.mm a Ilh5.at11w,m s 1 1" a III III 11..,. '1 AdeIIItd 111 """"16 2:... 3 .2mIIIe ' S ()VIE?. or IIL. IIms,e Irlm'Intl 4"uwm II III1.itIII Ill9 m'II IIII I e.n t III coos „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, .(,) '1" ) " „.� 1"81" °III @ ��o� �;°2 m„ c IIIII w,� w ���wµ m ~•M ' ,m'wm :m 111";t, 'r m� � ; III III m...... � III Ad opted III u�" � �.�ul�rlul m�..ul m�ul�mlll � ul � III L I„ � �. ell' III ! ul'°ul°uI ate 1 .. III III 4„,„,,,„,: '10 C uw rri °root I ul .d Ad i5 III I" ' III I^I 2(,)2:2 III;E I III (l ulrl liia 111 .3111'1(J Ill rr g at VIII o " n `' ust4anloe r ur '� u��ro' w fig* ���..��, m• m.mlll�mm.mm. uI� I,l� III �.. III �mr III 11L.,�. lu ,u ul� �i � uuu A ��ull M it ����lu � ���� �� ���o ��...'��� pad Area Walter �.. � � �� ������� lc ��� �� ������' ��°M �� Ass u�uM n'"" m"„" ��� ��� uuu °n � � w u. � III III m. � ��� �.� III �.��.�.� III u� VI II.a.,.„ ul��m......ul ul�ul�III m ul�m�. 111,„„„aulul�.� �..m�mlV �°� m m�m m�� 1,,u1 �.I � III 11,mul� I� III �. ,�,���.�,�ululm ull� � ' "" I ll :11: "'I "'I e. ate :11:' :',ri m. � 111 11 1I�.,�� � � � ��� co III""""M end Ilr,m ul m ��.��� u1 l � m!���,,��m�m� ur ��'�III Im.�m��ul� III �':�u � �m�.���uhmm ^u1u1� ��'re�lll 'u.ulll �� �� � � �� � � �� ��� � �� it i �.� . ..lu uuu ����� ���� ,7i1 �.� u i u� bit) � � �„ .. IY�'. ��� w... � � �� ^���'� i" i �ql ������� ���'�lu '.A III".. i p" 'u. �,„ � � �� � „?µ "' ������'� ry uui � ." uuu ' II III IV ,� 1� ww��,�,.��.�,��urmm ul III ul �,u��uIIII � w� � III m.w it it � ��� IIL........ � I�.mm ul� 1 II � m,u ul ul + u1 u1 �. ���m rod � ' u�� �.. �� � III �. �,�� III dent III �.� ul ���m opal; ul III m.w �...,�� III , 1" a lb: III m„.!,1,1, it r)„, 111e C„�I� m,u rre. urrt ur1d A,o III t sIII dent IIIIII .. ww�uu�m stool �w� not ul III u1 w � ul III m.���m.� u1 m lll lu�ul III Il m. "Ca "'In. - 11111 ' Im �.,p, .� » III�� III w'N;� ww� � ��� III �u ��I���� ��� �� a:t r '��ull. ;n w"^p IIIIIY"°II ' w"1V' *• Ilr'.� .„ '.'.m °.^ "�'��I ^' "II ;,3 lb: III 111�.,� II aIb:IIIuw 3 3 11.0 n I II ;0III d III ' III I0, e gn III m 'II' mwm by CIll.m �'uw��urmm ul� r a Illwm : ' .at u1 Cmu,.ml,,m.t rne ul s lby III' mete. ur S a Scw Me re Ob ul , „, „, „ „, „, „, , „, „, „ „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, m 1 ""M ' illy" µfill .� �. I ����III. ww u, � � '•.A " �I rv•i �.� �'.� �uilh �'.Wli orel,, � a III I�.w � � ��� �, � ul III Ill.�m ul� ' III �.� I� too �.�� mwr III I� m�w �,� ul ul m�w uI�1 � � ate �,,�� ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, �� �� ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, ��, ��, ��, ��, � �, ��, � �, 1 10 3.111 1L.,. 5 111 "6"6 (3 e. 1. o fS e ur Illm ul 1119. s Ill.t III t „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „„ „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, ^'m ������ ��� .�� ,„� � � „m, , � ��� �� III � „ costar ���� � , III m...... � ��� �,� �.��� III � �.�� III m ! Ill.�m . u1 1 ; lb. III e AthaIIte.d 11 '5' ! IIIu.es III dent III aIII Vol! ulrmul�.. 2 wl .M 1 , III III ��' -5 �.��.�III��" d III u� 2�.� 2 III 1.1Illtul III �.�ul�ul�ullll„!� „w.uul�mm� III uI�ul Ill���w uld u1ul�.ulm.,mIII " () I II 1�uI u1°u1�.. Ill��mmt� �8 nom : .„ ." m � �: III III �.�� �.�� �.� ��� �.� opted Ilh.°° �1� I II ul � ul � �;� �. ul �.� ul� ���� �� u1 m I II m�.��� M ! u1 m m �.�� III�II� etas ����� „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „„ „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, 39 la III III Ie fi ,„999er LIn91 III9L veulmw�,u III� m��u�,uulul ulmrn ulru ,.� � .. .. .. '. ...' III �.,� Cost, � m�lll Ill�';ml �-�� Ilh.° u� :of S ryIii ' C urmmll aurmmlm1 to III"R„evenu.ue n er Ill.... mmulel.ulnm� Ill e m'.,m ^i ,..III. � 115,ate I :,� .„. . ' ,I yes � � III III ��.w � ��� m��,��� �. �„ti� �.� or. III Il� ll�.�m �� ��„��� III �I lu�' �. III II� ,��� I II �. u1 :m. :.m. Sewer I �,m, CB��.' mrtd�l� n1,6 � III IIImw, ��- ����„�'11I1f '��w.��� Ilh '� M��II M� ~ � rwwwur IIL. L�m�w I II ul.,ti���..,.I� "la 111 111 1 11 o. Res oronlurmm d 111'' Ir 2022 RN? ii w'I cool III111 mmuruld II cu mIII ciee III aIII °mlllmmulm~mmm' III3 tmm , III „. ;„. .�o�, w. " 888"Y 2 2„wm ,. EMS ,. . '„I�, „� m�°s IIY"'� ' :m�arc' n. 5 � Ill,m lllwmlll ' �-.m .m III����III�.m �.M�.� III �.u' m.�III�.� �III�ulul w'wum����IIIm � �IIIII.mw�.,� ens III�.�m�.�� a �w mmlllmlll ' -.' " III G / III ILII'0III , III µ .mulm .m III . III Ill m l I :m' ul°�mmmur 'I III " . ' 1Ill3 Illwm III e' 6-8 3 C: ul mwm 11 69 2022 Cap III t III OS' III III ace ruts ul t t,.; III „a rgl III ts III , t III() �� uui u,. I u^ u, ��� uu � � uu ���� ������'� . ii, '2,022, �. reel, uu i � �� �� Cap � �� � I IIIwm III ' ����I� �„.�m.µIII ��Mm.J! Ilh.°° " .' ���ul m �^musl�Ill� I �m�ur IIL.,IIIm ...11�w mu1 1�;� �wI''mmlll ul rmlll III3.mw III IIII ace ul"nrri nt C IhI ulwgmrM IL I I ....II - @ uM2 ) m* '.u, ^r :BSI . .m„ � I Illwm III 11�.w it �.� ��� �:�J! ��m' III �.mw� .�J! III u� � �... I II II�� mwm ��..11� ul II�.�� m��, u1 1 � ul m.�m III �M�I� ul � III . m.�� III LEO'S m.w �li uA �.u�wr ul III II� �m�wr ��uu� „„ "1" -w w III w. ��� bee � I III III el, � � ��� �:�� pits ' III III ����� �� �m � �:��� ul"r1 ul"�m �u� re III III ul M� e III . m ) III m,ul m) lAlatter Rates „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, , „, „, „ „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, I '6 II aIII IIImm' 6-11 2: Ado d III Y 2022 3 ICulem.. urm ulg,",mtIII ctn 0u1"1IIIy Ye n°u1E. Water 114".atm.s 4111 II a III III f.. 6-1II 3: Ad m.w d 111"6Y 2022 .3 C.; re m.. m..tmm.. ul IS as a n m,ll m.,m I II 1119.43 Illwml III Ill.m c coon? III"m1 .3 ropes „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, 4 1 lb: III 1„:„,,1,1, 6-1II ,:1. (a III t. d 111"6Y 2022 Ciandmom.,.ul t.w Ike III 3 C ul mw k Se r wmm me IIRIl.m m3 „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, , „, „, „ „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, 419 "I" (!)VV 4':), II"' , II A II",! ( 114., C 0110 II*II "II'.iii. II 1111 i. I NS II ''ti 11 A11" II"? AIIORII:) S EENV II ' 1. 11"?A'11" i1/4111,1111:: C:AIIPA',II S .. 1 ,. .„ � ��mII III�.. III �m. III ,� ul ul ul �.Illr� m m.,m1.mmu1 CaoIIl ecoo Ety lfee III cmruIII tIII III recess 63 T� IIII III m'�����II,. 53,-2: IIII .r3 ul uI p'ul m.m nolo S°„ � m.m IIII' II 'a urteIII I I II L... ur C aIIII ac uI �. ���� OE' C m.m 10 ;3 t uI l.:3 u1 u1 „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, .55 ' � �;m�ulamul� � �uru1III �µ ul �„„� �!mII �°��IiI�� III':..: ' III . � m� 111 m''w � .�� �„ m ILm u1 u1 uI� and ' (.� IIII t.e' 111"""'Y �.. �.. ���... III III m;;'m uI� """ III ��.m� r� uI ' uI� �. III uI� u1 u1 III ., ""alll III .5) c"igo, pittall III ' IIIRe^ lii mim m III °rood III.. aIllm ' mam'm ur Calpar; 111"""'e a Assecesurmment ' .. lw:m114 III �u.m �.� III . . III III III III IIm m III III m SmmIIIpea ul Mn.mlllrmllle astm.liin.mtm.III III m.,, m cpm.mIII opt III goo n 57 'I' IIII' III e Flag g Ill"""nor (.11 a orlo Ill.,m ur urn ul m t, r a 11ir a e ul t.y III......' m)! Assess uI m':m^� ul mt cm Ilhm m.) III „, 59 � olo") IIII III lIIo) 8 1684.a uhmm p Ole III 3„. s ul ' e nit a ;„1111 VV te r C p ;„:,:1m:urn y Ilh... by m.m st, m„:m urm~m e � 1 � III III µwu'� � IIL........ muhmmlll � Illmwm III�m.casIll mwm tmaIII Vilao8tevvateIII ::: p aIIItt,y III m'"wmmwms III m,mst, ^. III III III m.m � III III �Im*^ mw � o le. IIIe IIL.... nolo r1 III III m,mIIIt y III ^ „„ entEa Mfe tm;mor' 19 �:'mmwul� III am'm �,� III I ��� m,m � ulrllmmmmul 114.°' uI am�l11IIIm;r III �� is 11,111 le'l. d'",8 III .amuo mm t ,,,,,,,, l m"ml ii y 111;142,,,s liid e orort r' III ast, ilt.er. („9wm lhm�m''4„rule 111"""'4333,,,s h mJstonier 111,3r5,3fi 111e „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, l'61118 °ooa III3' III oLoo 11 III moo IIII^ III e ()tiles, an III' (3, t, a lii 111iAfate ('!3' a pa mr III s by 131„.1 S t IC) r I II ! uralll lu 111 e „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, 6'1 I' aIllmmlllcoo 8 11 III ;,mul"m"uIIIIrIIIIe I'h"Immwm.. J.mululm1 III8.81,0III III 3„m .µ11ta.)m iml.m..ul III ty 111"""',118 es by mm m.murmmm r u1ofilllm 6°1 '7a . III III 8 1 IIL........x. anul IIIlmwm s tomm.mul e liVat3)r Cool mm'a , IIE"' ace IIII .fr,.�m.,m: tm.mulm°maul III urm.mh"IuIIIIm''m �.m � 7a IIII' III u.. 1 III8,) ! ;„,m ul"m u1 114 III e I II t ,t,ta ul au1 uI t a st etw a te,r C a IIII a c ul ty OE"' e ° s C 1Il.,m ateore m.) or I II arm. fi III e„, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, '7a 103.111 e 8 ,,,,,, '"10 III':.......xa III � IIL....... ��� uI nil � ate ur �. �;m ����.m m�.��, uI � �1 III m.w �.� II, �"�����m m.,Iu ,.�� �� u1 mm e uI III u1 m:����m I II �, ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �, �.m �..� III ...� I II .Inm '7E1103.111 e 8 ,,,,,, unm Ilf III e II1,„„„ag uI ul"m em at await) ur Cap 1tm c.; uI � .!� III e ea ley C m.JS tO u1'uLm e IP urm ''Il5 III 43 „, 62 '7alb. III III .rµm° dmul u11plk.e. mmtlumrl "")n111µ ,mom urn a IpacEly III m.M s IOby Cmmu toulmmce, IIPrm°llllllmm ulm Iu, jm....,.m ,tm......d A, uhmulmm,m tm..ul III5. 1119.evi3 n t„ue I II n ;ulm em..em33 3 �m :! w . ri ., .. uI g II�,m ul�m�!��'m � � ��� ��,m ��:miiim+ul m IIII uI ��; I II I II u1 mm� mww �.� urml 114.° III•cit tm.m IIII I II m,m n ci uI n5,3 „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, I g Il mul mm "m ,µ II119rojteat mA m mm.'mm0,mmmlll r8"ewrul III '!m m II11";te eo.nm,mmwm III nm ors? ;lees � I I I' -net ^ l„ .„ e Ium w . ,M „ sr ' � .„ : . ulwrµ� Ill.m ul �� � � � m� cm�. ur m�.m IIIr1 ul ��,mIII III ul m.�„Ipm� m� w w ul.mm:� III urm�m„� µ�.�rm µµwk no Iii m'm 111 III......' m.m n d I ii n ��.�. III.531 III.m III m2,1! uulruy p III III m.mIIIm IhIIL, aeur mRSIIIµ..Ve urul„III aIII 1E3 III llanm ,.µ 5; 111„J 6 III mmn thIlly it:;(„)ulmmurmm mulm.,ult.mIII 0 ulnm* ate r e (e.ur 1ILme taurmm ul III 3 III I II III Cmmul.dIII'amwul mmn 1� El m.m III m)n Ill III uI urulm; atulm.mn n ul ul u1 . ur III etm'!'.ur C.mm.m u1'° III' 3 III III III 1E; Ire o°murmsm.mn .' " ,' :,M m m . uI Ill.�m ulwm�µ�. � �� ��� IIII m��m, uI� �. �� III ^ �� ��w. III u1 m �w� IIII �.m� uI IIII ate uI �������m Ill.,m � �m.� ul�rm uIw :Sewer. uI IIL..� III I II III III nt mµ'°;t „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, VIg Ill.,m re. 1 n th III .�' '"III or) „',� IIII r Mete ur Co1„Jsto Ire , uI SeNnter 1E3 III III I II I II u1 u1 m ul ��, arm 109.e ul m.i e u1 n ul et.111 1M 0111,11 IIIgm,mIII m....... 4Domo me ureIII mm III on 4,31h 1M m..11,,m..lu ont, y µ,'m11 u1 1E3 III III I II .„SIll..mlll voo' 2m ul�: m,m ul m....... I II III ' (3'19 I II ou1 u1it,III mIII at. ,!m..ul ! m.. III I ul11mm.,ur L.m.�,EiS � 1 ulg ulmmljm., t. lu Anonmru 'Wetm.mul I61;3otm.m IIII.m..vcap mrum.. IIln 'ore CIIII' Ilkm �al. .������" I� .. . "11 �., µ�^ µ;r � . �����m CII: IEEE ^' . ' 'f��,,;I ..�. ..„, s � .����� �^ an �.� t ��;,. 5 III ul�,�mruul m.. � III reject m.� III m�w�m.mlll Mm��..ur IIII m�mulrum�� I II ulru� ' mmh"I hli�mµm�mul �.w 111�1 III mmIllm�mul°°ul � µ.min°°u1m� III �m�m ulw,�mm �µ"mul�mµ�.,� �� ., � ,.. III m,m ul�m'. �'.�. 114.° uI m m l.m m.� � u1 m arm m.m �m� 'm III m'm�; ur II4.'° 1ILm ul�mm°� IIL.) SC m � III .,.� �I ul 53111i.) ul m',, t m op ul tem 1 11 OP u1 gj a s a ooloci I II ul ooj mAm. elIIp ul sIII I II m,m n' Iii ng „, I m Iu mlll mm rajtfi;tect A, II"ml ulmm.mmmIII eweIII 111"3.evte III4.mrven1,3 Illncwore ;3..18ce �m' ��, � mm.m m m..r µ m. m.m III ��m II m' m m „m:, ,� 1 � III .„gym m mm 111"""' II Ill� ul .' �' III III .� . � � � °°'III w� � .mr ur 1111 11' µmulm ' IIIIIIIIIII III III �" �""" ur � .m .. Ilhu1 IIL..... �'m mmulm w wµmurm ' Ill�.m� .. .mur �°"� urµ, w . M� m w . ,M e „ � ,. m I u � Ill.,m ul�m'', � � �m� cm..ur III'�O Iii IIImm �.,� w.m�hm ' III urm�m„�m.mm�tm)�� mmIII ' ul µnmIII III......'mwmul�ulm'�iIii �rm�3 " � �'� µ.m ul mwm m� w .w .� III µwmct mmmul.�m III �u �� � 1 �� �,m mu1 IMAILsm�m �w��'�. III ul „� Ill.,m ul u� � �������� m.�m � � m„.mm uI u1m,. ur �,m,w�,w� III m�,�w�m Illm� ul ul u1m,, ���'��' °"dm , w,� 3 ... III ar���,� Ill.,m III ��w�µ ��� � .�� IIII III ��.�,m III IIII 11„.m Ilan �.111�1 III ,�w�m��,m�w�, u1 I II .�� III ' III 111 � I II I II III���.�� III III III III um IIII �.mmw��, � � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ���.� � „# .�� ,. IIl µm�m^�ulm,1 mulrn ul���mIII ��w.m��,tm.�ur�mm�ul IIL.� uI III I II �„ �mwoulmmmlllrl��m�r�l mMmul ul uI IIµ m ulm� a ���� w."Mi uuuilii'�� �� ��� i i '� ����� �, �, � w ���, � � � „%i w 'M "M ���. i�� .p.. ���.� � �� � ,� � � w '������ ��� ��� �, ��� � �� �' ul ���,� Ill,m ul mwu YN ��� IIII ul'm�� �� � ��m m.�w u1 µrrm Ire orc); ul ���,� III � ul ul� m n� IIII �!!m �. ul IIII m�.,.��m.,�. u1 �������m m,m � �.m.m u1 mm u1 IIL..�� ul I II III m m�.m uI m�1 oat') 111111' ' w n � t �, �., ':��;"�. :m ;�. �.�, ,rsi� .. .'Inc ���,,s t m. w 8' : „ w „„�. �..� � �.� ¢a,, w 1113 "' w"'Itc 39 III ul�,� , + III m.wul ml III m.m� �� ulm.ulµw ul ul �ul��,.mIII � ul III�1 �m�m�ul III m��.m"�ul ��m.m �.�II„mulr�mµw ul IIL. ��� uI III III �m'mul�rmlll �mul ul .�m.mu1�1 Ill m ul �m III m�ulm�.�� . 1 1 1' - � Y^M :313 ul�,� III ul m�ul13µm�.ulm.�ul,.u1 �uI�u1 III .+ "'� ul ul ulm..111�1 �,mtm,.u1 III m�w�. u1 .mm.m �.m.wulrl�.ul ur III' I�� uI III III �.3m�'Murm�lllf m:'murul,.µm.µurul 111111' t ���w., ����m w ��w., ul �� m.m ul m.. ��� m:m' u1�1 �. �m �� �. III u1 m1 m.�w IIII � l. I�.. ul IIII m.. �.m.. ul m,m m.�m not ul �� r 11E3 ul I II III III m °pact „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, 4,6 III III I��� arm mwm',m, 6-63: INAm°.:m n t h '"III ,,,,,, Ill 111 111c u1 Met() ur m.„ms to 111 mmm coo. or Se or 1E3 III III I II I II ore III tact,, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, „, it 6 iN Ih�M m;:m I I' ,V M tl: II ; II U , II II PM.dm II N IIIIIII W Ihw" II III, IINI II 4;"A.113 ? II 'II 1...,11 1121C"! III uI � mmm III",?, uI n ul III Il mmm'u run III III m",m t uI III 3 uI mmm Irma y I u nu32 C3 G urml m urmm ul maul uI uI c III ° I III m'...'.. IILt. ur III c„m n t ate r 1E3 ul m.m ul m y CIII; ° r ��� �m i .�� ������ mi �.�� 'f9" �.� C�' . :��m ate '. ��'m ":Ila VI m'';� Iu,�m ul�m�',',�m , ������ ���� '��� III':. ' °'�"" ' '. III m uI m.m � III m 111""""Y � ����... �!',~� ���� ul �.�m� III�I urm ' II � m�� urm � uI m���� ... III uI III �. III �;'�m'� �IL.,, I � m.. ur �,"����m III I II ��� ��� ��� ��� �� � ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� � �� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� ��� � �� ��� „, m III .A� ,„ !I7 1111 m0,m.„.��l. �3 o 111"""'ul,. lu..m ul m. � � III .m ,�ulm:�m..ul� ul �m�,� �,mm�ul�I III m�m� �l..mul m. „ III uI m pit III .m..s n tuI III zit; uI ty APPENDIX A„ APPENDIX B„ APPENDIX C„ ateir IFiiirnancii, Il IPII n ateir Capacity Fee ater Cost -of -Service Results APPENDIX D„ ate Rate R commend attii fins APPENDIX IE„ astewateir IFiiir"nanciiall Plan APPENDIX IF: astewaheir Capacity Fee APPENDIX G: astewateir Cost -of -Service Results APPENDIX H: astewateir Rite Recommendations APPENDIX II„ CRC IRelpoirt A II" ,! ()IIM. "1f" 0110 II*II "II'kii. Il bll'IIIII S ''ti IIII III , WA II"'II'Iiii ll"? III III II ' 11"?.A"'11"' CI:AIF' ACII II II'SI II: "'I " "'"ii"" 0'11'1'1E; e u lrtlJu::)I iIu mII II M,N II ,„, 11 1 lb,II n 0°°00 i, a 100 1 000 tlan il; II Idp.11,n . "'ll'" C)IN,11'4 rr;)II' ,V A 4'. II ';.rr 11',,I1 P d h;;R II II°' ' II 'w" II II MU II II "11" II 11'4 S RR ,rygll '" k II 1 Y' II°° 11''... 11 :J13 '11'11..11 : "'' " The Town of Jackson (Town) retained Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. (Raftelis) in 2019 to complete a comprehensive water financial plan, rate, and capacity fee study (Study). The purpose of the Study was to develop financial plans from Fiscal Year (FY') 2020 through FY 2029 (Study Period) and water and wastewater rate and capacity fee structures consistent with Town objectives which maintain a stand-alone water and wastewater enterprise fund over the Study Period. The Town requested that Raftelis complete the following major objectives: Develop separate water and sewer fund financial plans for the 10 -year Study Period. Evaluate separate water and sewer rate revenue adjustments for the Study Period necessary to fund annual revenue requirements, maintain adequate cash reserves, and provide appropriate debt service coverage. Complete a separate water and sewer class cost -of -service analysis using a single (FY 2022) test -year. Propose water and sewer rates by customer class for FY 2022 effective July 1, 2021. Complete a comprehensive evaluation of the Town's water and sewer capacity fees, including alternative assessment approaches. Propose water and sewer capacity fees effective July 1, 2021, with proposed annual adjustments for inflation as reflected within the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI). Our report to the Town contains nine sections as follows: M'b Section 1 - Executive Summary Section 2 - Introduction Section 3 - Utility Background, Customer Data, & Growth Section 4 - Financial Plan Section 5 - Water Cost -of -Service and Rate Recommendations Section 6 - Sewer Cost -of -Service and Rate Recommendations Section 7 - Rate Survey Comparison Section 8 - Capacity Fees Section 9 - Capacity Fee Survey The report contains nine appendices including the water and wastewater financial plan, FY 2022 test -year cost -of -service analysis, FY 2022 water and sewer rate design recommendations, water and sewer capacity fee calculations, rate, and capacity fee survey information. Appendix A contains water fund financial plan results and related data inputs and assumptions. Appendix B contains the water capacity fee calculations, inputs, and recommendations. Appendix C contains the water cost -of -service results for the FY 2022 test -year. Appendix D contains the water rate design recommendations. Appendix E contains wastewater fund financial plan results and related data inputs and assumptions. 1 Refers to the year at the end of the fiscal year (e.g., FY 2022 is the period ending June 30, 2022). Appendix F contains the wastewater capacity fee calculations, inputs, and recommendations. Appendix G contains the wastewater cost -of -service results for a FY 2022 test -year. Appendix H contains the wastewater rate design recommendations. Appendix I contains the Citizen Rate Committee (CRC) Report. The water and sewer utility financial plans are organized around a total fund with separate operations and capital improvement subfunds. The respective water and sewer rate revenue requirements represent the cost of providing service and include O&M expenses, debt service obligations, and other cash inflows and outflows. All capital costs are assigned to the water and sewer capital improvement subfunds, where funding is provided from capacity fee revenues, interest income, and transfers from the operations subfund, net bond proceeds, and grants (subject to award). The only expenses in the capital improvement subfund are capital improvement expenditures. The financial plan evaluates the adequacy of system revenues (adjusted for customer and demand -related growth) to: Fund annual O&M expenses, debt service and capital expenditures, and Maintain the following financial performance thresholds or targets: o Exceed debt service coverage (DSC) ratio of at least 1.30 times annual debt service. o Exceed water fund cash reserve targets of • 50% (180 days) of annual O&M expenses PLUS • the average annual cash -funded capital project expenses separated set for FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. o Exceed sewer fund cash reserve targets of • 50% (180 days) of annual O&M expenses PLUS • the average annual cash -funded capital project expenses separated set for FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. Figure 1-1 summarizes proposed sewer rate revenue increases during the Study Period that are necessary to fund annual expenditures and meet financial performance criteria. "'11"(,),(VII M x.) 11,, 11',',C ° IOVI II * II " II'kii. 11-11 11',,E ISM S II''ti II A II"' 11 ' '.. 111,0 11 " II"'k i 11 11 II I11,, d.. , II II " II"' JUI .°i2uore Il 1oroj „u,rted ui ui t„laIII Water I°Rate III'leveui iiiJa Illuror:ur°e u a m m �* „m 8% ©/o 8% 9% 9% 2 2 2022 2023 2024 2025 ma Adopted FY 2022 EffRect[ve hay 1, 2021 The financial plan and capital funding incorporate the inflated CIP amounts based on the anticipated timing of the projects and an assumed capital inflation rate of 7.0% applied starting in 2022. Figure 1-2 shows the Study Period water capital projects totaling $22.41 million comprised of $10.07 in projected new debt and $12.34 million cash -funded CIP by year. $6 ° $4 $3 $2 $ 1 so Il:: lul.uur°e 2: INater Cap,talll III'° ui°eje µte uur°o :i I°Projeeted Callf liii ; III III': ; iii.u ui 10111111111111111111111111111111 AAA 2020 211121 2022 2023 2024 212 a 2026 2 27 202 2u1i.29 MI Cash Funded • Debt Fun ed Figure 1-3 summarizes proposed sewer rate revenue increases during the Study Period that are necessary to fund annual expenditures and meet financial performance criteria. iu ui ul°°ul ul u.�;" I II ewe III ul°° '° aria III'° e'ae'ul nut) IIl ul teasesc OF"' 111q1„,1 ore ill IIC:°� 111"ej :;u m m . 7% 6% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2©% 1% 0% 2021 2 22 2023 2024 2025 The financial plan and capital funding incorporate the inflated CIP amounts based on the anticipated timing of the projects and an assumed capital inflation rate of 7.0% applied starting in FY 2022. Figure 1-4 shows the Study Period sewer capital projects totaling $11.75 million anticipated to be fully cash funded. II11 1"" a tl ulre ewe^ or � Iii is III III:��� ul�u°��u j j m, Ilf ° ���� u1,.I u;.cts anct IIC 1 ' ulrre eu eu�i 1,;cu liiiu: IIC1111 lu ul a liin1 in $2.5 c 5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 111111111111I Cash Funded ■ Debt Funded Raftelis worked with Town staff and the CRC to evaluate the rate structure alternatives and recommend monthly rate and one-time capacity fee structures. The adopted rates maintain the existing monthly base rates increasing by meter size and include different volumetric rate by customer classes for Residential, Commercial, and Irrigation -Only which transition closer to customer class cost of service while increasing overall user charges by 8%. "I"10 FA II''"' , II A CI HIS() .„ V II" Il " 11'11'11 II II II 1111 1114 S I''V 1111 111 , WAII"' II"ii' II"? AIIOR II' S 111 III 11 1k. 111"?. II"' II"ii'.. A IIMII II" CI: A 11111''" C III II I OE "II"' U 10111 Appendix D contains additional detail related to the recommended Town rates. Tables 1-1 and 1-2 summarize current adopted base and residential volume rates effective July 1, 2021. Separate Commercial and Irrigation -Only customer volume rates reflect a minimum allowance of 2,000 gallons per account and varying uniform volume rates for use over 2,000 gallons. Commercial includes Multi -Family Residential and all Non -Residential customer classes (e.g., Commercial, School, and Government). llrabIlIIe 1-1: dt Illprled I0IFW 2822 lArater1111113ade Charges Cu ir 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch $ 7.22 9.93 17.41 18.98 54.54 86.26 159.34 N/A $ 11.00 16.39 28.54 43.61 86.39 132.65 259.66 414.33 " Ittablllu,or 1-2: Adopted 1IFY 2022 III'110'1e n 1112111VoIllume Water Rates Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 A location 0 - 2,000 2,001 - 6,000 6,001 - 25,000 Over 25,000 $2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 $ 0.00 1.24 2.48 3.72 Figure 1-5 summarizes monthly bills for four residential customer profiles with a 3/4 -inch meter size and 2,000 to 30,000 gallons of water use under the current and adopted FY 2022 rates. $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 so I :"' lIIIg uu°r 'i ,2 ""'III"°2llf liittallll IIl euoitolhlOIy aieur IIIteRIIIdeontIIIirmlll I0P03 10I00I III ummlp c't $71 $39 $18 Current 2 kgal 0Illlllllll00 5 kgal $11 $15 $38 Adopted 15 kgal Iliuiiiu 30 kgal $82 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 1 Tier 2 Table 1-3 summarizes current and adopted non-residential volume rates. 11C" 0011lle 1 AdoIII' h''r d IIIIIIIIII"Y 2022 OM Ill tlii IIII Dui III Illy and Old m°:mui 111'!,.e, liiymwui aiialll °mlll mm ui me' III .'.;; at:e t Atte cad n 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $2.12 $ 0.00 2.12 2.12 Figure 1-6 shows the monthly water bills for six Non -Residential customer profiles with a 1 -inch meter using 10,000 to 100,000 gallons per month under the current and adopted rates. IIIIIII III9 u..ul ul e "1 y III2 :wu1"milll uIlly Cm: uunIIIruIeIIIm Vliate 111Mater Om,ueim°: u1'm eu1W IIIIIIII Iii III III $116 $95 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Current ulf Ilya ul'Iiiaco u11 $222 $224 $118 $97 $55 1111111 � c Adopted 1 10 kgal 111 11 11111 11111 1 15 kgal 20 kgal HI 40 kgal um 50 kgal IIIIII IIIIII 100 kgal Table 1-4 summarizes current adopted Irrigation -Only customer volume rates. ."'lll""' b I lII e i y d I ll :m m III I" �� 21:22 I II ulµr cute Allocation„ 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 ono on Illy Vm III Lime, III'°ia :m'ma $2.12 $ 0.00 2.12 2.48 Figure 1-7 shows the monthly water bills for three Irrigation -Only customer profiles with a 1 -inch meter using 20,000 to 50,000 gallons per month under the current and adopted rates. "II" (,!!)1,,,,,i II (:) 11'"' „III Ail,; II" : Il M ""1P" I°VI II * II " II'Iiii II b II 1`,4 S II''V II A II"' II'kii. II " 11 ' ',. IRA II"' II"'k. ,'m 11 11 II II ^" d.. , II II S"'11"' 9U III dtot ore $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 IMo ono ll Illy IIIu12II u�. e y "1 IIIIonooelll Water IIMetc ui dLi ieui to Illl k � Iii III III Conn lll aorII ° orlo � uieui� ui� $42 $106 $85 Current RE 20 kgal alai 40 legal $61 Adopted 50 kgal $135 Table 1-5 summarizes existing and adopted base charges by meter size. Table 1-6 summarizes FY 2022 residential volume rates. Adopted base charges and volume rates went into effect July 1, 2021. tlIrIalbIIIIe l ono 5 Adopted III °y 2.022 Sewer111';1111 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch Curren e rC II° '' orgee $ 7.00 9.80 17.11 25.20 52.76 81.24 153.23 N/A Ado a,tedl $ 11.55 14.61 23.61 31.64 53.34 81.02 146.34 224.97 It o e, u� � ellha e '1 �����d ���� d��°��o Ill ���:e,d III�:���� " �uP " 2 III"I e ����s ui d e untVi a III 29)111 u ui e Me 11) �i Ioi Tier 1 Tier 2 W t IV`';; Allocation 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $2.27 $ 0.00 2.27 2.27 Table 1-7 summarizes non-residential volume rates that apply to all other Class 1 sewer customers and those with "domestic" strength discharges. Class 1 sewer customers have biological oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) strengths below 250 milligrams per liter or what is considered "domestic" strength discharges. The $2.27 per kgal is comprised of a portion for volume or flow irrespective of strength equal to $1.67 per kgal charges for BOD and TSS strength of $0.36 and $0.24 per kgal respectively. ..."'allellle l i"' mmll tern: III': ;°1° 2022 22 ,Ille, e 1112 on III'tleeOldeulmlliielll umllluMuuleme III' el:mue Tier 2 Tier 2 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $2.27 $ 0.00 2.27 2.27 Figure 1-8 summarizes the current and adopted monthly bills for four customer profiles with a 3A -inch meter size and billed wastewater volumes ranging from 2,000 to 30,000 gallons. $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 II:IIII lllgoot re 1-8: 1112ontllh Illy rattoolllIInclll muieul Meteor Custoorner Sewer III''1011t Oli III II ul'mmpact $12 $18 $30 $12 $18 $30 Cur Adopted 2 legal 5 legal 10 kgal 20 kgal $52 Figure 1-9 summarizes a monthly customer bill for a customer with 1 -inch water meter and five profiles with billed volumes 10,000 gals. to 100,000 gals. $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 so re cureµ '1 9' 1IMImulm' lh1112 Ill ul"'m atlllm tAlateulr Meter 2u.ueionteul m ,o„. tor ononpact 10 $33 $44 123 $237 $44 ic $124 101 IIOIOIOIOIOIOIn Cur Adopted 11111110 10 kgal 15 kgal os 20 kgal ii iii ii ii 40 kgal th 50 kgal uuuuuuu 100 kgal $237 "I" .(ID , p e il!!!'f; ",1,'.3 (D IV , "u" lip II " II " II'liii II II e II''ti II "6& II"' II'liii II ? 1108 11"D II II k. 11"? , II' II:',E i'wM II II II II' "' 4; , II II 1P II " II 'k Ill' S"t 9I I0'1 Raftelis worked with Town staff to evaluate the rate structure alternatives and recommend adopting 3 Creek customer rates which mirror the adopted Town rates while recovering the cost -of -service of providing contract retail services to 3 Creek customers. The rates reflect the cost -of -service to provide 3 Creek water and sewer services. 3 Creek customers are sited on large lots and many exert more significant peak usage ratios than Town Residential customers on a per account basis. Also, as part of the update, Raftelis reviewed the 3 Creek Water and Sewer Capital Replacement Charge. Raftelis and Town Staff, and 3 Creek representatives met to review preliminary 3 Creek base and volume rates. Following the meeting, the Town and 3 Creek agreed to remove some of the pipelines from the Capital Replacement Charge calculation for purposes of calculating the Capital Replacement Charge. This amount is the "adjustment" reference in Table 1-7. The Town has updated the Capital Replacement Charge annually since 2007. The charge is calculated as the annual replacement value per 3 Creek lot and is assessed in addition to the 3 Creek base rate. Table 1-8 summarizes existing and adopted 3 Creek base rates and Capital Replacement Charge by meter size. Tables 1-9, 1-10, and 1-11 summarize FY 2022 3 Creek volume rates effective July 1, 2021 for Residential, Commercial, and Irrigation -Only customers respectively. A. ' 18'102: 1 8: Ad o III I w III 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch 11C"" Ilh lll Curre $ 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 N/A Adopted Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Oreek WaterBase and CapIilalll III i. 111 Ill plent Charges Current' 11: Ilh 11 1 1 10 A3 1plelti 111"""'Y Tier 1 Tier 2 $24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 N/A u re t $ 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 N/A Adopted, $ 13.56 20.16 35.18 53.76 106.50 163.52 320.09 510.76 Adopted $17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 2022 sIIIIIdIII e tIIii Ill 3 Cur tmllk Water .. ui °mc Allocation 0 - 2,000 2,001 - 6,000 6,001- 25,000 Over 25,000 2022 ' °)un ate r IIII I II 3 C;retelk Water Allocation 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $1.11 $ 0.00 2.02 4.04 6.06 $31.33 37.93 52.95 71.53 124.27 181.29 337.86 528.53 r V III alnc Rates ed $ 0.00 2.02 Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 ."11112alI IIIe 1-11: Adopted °ie Ilh::°1Y 21':122 III ulrurl tIIiIIoul1 n111y 3 Cre.elk II I u pie OR- l:e' A'1YIoca`t"iatt 0 - 2,000 2,001- 25,000 Over 25,000 $2.12 2.12 2.12 $ 0.00 4.04 6.06 Table 1-12 summarizes existing and adopted 3 Creek sewer base and Capital Replacement Charges by meter size. Table 1-13 summarizes the FY 2022 3 Creek sewer volume rates effective July 1, 2021, which are the same as other volume rates. °01blllo Acic Iop ed III ° 2 2022 3 Creelk Si~e;,,, 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch III IlbIIIer 1 Current $ 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 N/A 13. A r sc iptien: Tier 1 Tier 2 Current�;;' Ca 6 ti %lice 6 ..u, $24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 N/A II ° "y 2 :11,1r Base and Cap111talll 111"111.epIllacenient i°u Ilh.meurge e $ 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 N/A Ac optetdl Base $ 17.75 22.45 36.28 48.62 81.97 124.51 224.89 345.73 Ado itedl Ca a. dieah,',,, $16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 Adairiledl, $34.25 3 8.9 5 52.78 65.12 98.47 141.01 241.39 362.23 Co uln ui~mme uI elii mIII 2 ui e Ilk Selmer VoIII IA 111111142, III 1!'.• 'IX"' Allocation 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $1.88 $ 0.00 1.88 2.27 As with adopted Town volume rates, 3 Creek volume rates summarized in Table 1-12 reflect Class 1 sewer customers with domestic (BOD) and (TSS) strengths. Also consistent with Town volume rates, Class 2 through Class 6 sewer customers with higher than domestic strengths are assessed higher volume rates for each respective strength class. Raftelis completed a survey of comparable resort utilities to compare to the Town's current and adopted monthly bills using 5,000 gallons per month for water and billed wastewater. Figure 1-10 shows a typical monthly under the current and adopted July 1, 2021, rates compared to the survey group. "11:b II M ()IF; , II ,I ; II :b II M "1P" P. IIVI II * II " II'.iii. Il b ll"'k. I M S 11'V II II"' II'.iii. II"? A, I11,4 11) III II 'II 11"?. ,P II " II'Ii ii A A II' ^" A 1, 11 '1 I 9 II: '"11 I;: Iii re r�ell e I i II .1esVIII 111aIII Ill rot hIlly iNater 103III IILmIII""eey $140 120 $100 $80 560 540 $20 50 $:36 $18 111111111111111111111111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $33 8 5105 582 587 $31 4 1111oopolooloom . 111 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 583 IN Water ■ Wastewater $125 Figure 1-11 shows the monthly bill for a commercial customer with a 1 -inch water meter using 12,000 gallons per month water and 5,000 gallons per month billed wastewater under the current rates and adopted July 1, 2021, rates compared to the survey group. $220 $200 $180 $1,60 $1.40 $120 5100 $80 560 540 520 50 0r II'° 1 m.m uI o µ ell Corn ul e rc Iii w rm ul,.m i � ��� I uI a u1 uI� m°� � o o ul� y Water ul� 1E111, 111 111 111 m,m ul°wm my $.50 $1:39 5111 5122 545 5109 ■ Water ■ Wastewater 572 $59 5196 $70 $92 In growing communities such as the Town, capacity fee receipts can provide a significant portion of required CIP funding and/or debt repayment of external debt financing providing upfront funding. Table 1-14 summarizes the existing water capacity fee compared to the alternative 1 capacity fee assessment schedule - both by meter size. Raftelis recommends meter size -based capacity fees for non-residential and irrigation -only developments. IbIll c: 1 000l d' ia taii �Ir;':� uI� -On y �.� Current and III 'i'. �. ... �u .' ul� a'��ul�, aul�iula an uI°ul�ul�. Calp:acOli y III 'a ' III y Meter Slii z e 3/4 -inch 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch Curren $690 1,227 2,761 4,909 11,044 19,633 44,176 N/A iAdo„® $2,793 4,664 9,301 14,887 29,801 46,559 93,091 148,951 III III ' aaa'alll For residential and multi -family customers, the adopted assessment is intended to correct an apparent disparity within the current meter sized based fee assessment. The adopted assessment approach will: Enable the Town to fully recover costs development places on the water system Provide more scalable fees and resulting impacts to the range of bedroom (and related housing sizes) resulting from new development and redevelopment. Separating indoor and outdoor water use requirements will also enable the Town to assess capacity fees separately for the two main drivers of residential water use (people and landscaping), but as separately assessed rather than combined within the requirements sizing the meter. In developing the modified capacity fee structure, Raftelis, Nelson Engineering and Town staff evaluated indoor water use for different bedrooms as the basis for the residential indoor fees by type and per bedroom. Irrigation -only water use reflects efficient irrigation systems and resulting water use per day in the peak period per irrigated square foot2. The indoor portion of the assessment schedules reflect peak water demands per bedroom. The outdoor portion of reflects peak irrigation season water use per square foot of landscaped area for all residential and irrigation -only customers. o Landscaped areas reflect the greater of the: ■ Minimum Land Development Regulation (LDR) Landscape Ratio (LSR) requirements, or ■ Actual landscaped areas. 2 Annual irrigation requirements developed using Guidelines for Estimating Unmetered Landscaping Water Use, Federal Energy Management Program, USDOE, July 2010. Peak period monthly irrigation use is assumed to be 20% of annual requirement. "II" :;d ,.II A iC II" :b II M . "1f" P. IOVI II * II " II'Iiii 11-11 11',,,,E NI S II 'V. WA "'II"' II'kii. II " AIIOfl 113 II II ' II " II"'k. IIMII II IF, d.. , II II I I II"' Table 1-15 summarizes the adopted residential water capacity fee assessment schedule. A 3 bedroom is assessed the same fee as 3A -inch meter and is considered one Equivalent Residential User (ERU). .. "" Water 111 ' III �III� �����;� '1 12���� 2t�lll l�''��ti III �� 2622 III°ft��ui2m��������ui�m��lii �ui��l Ill .� ui�t� �� lll .���^2 Allred ��� iiif2 III ee s ,buia ui 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Each Add' 1 Bedroom (1) Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. of Landscaped Area (2) 140 210 280 70 / BR PD $4.52 4.52 4.52 4.52 $633 949 1,265 316 (1) Per Nelson Engineering staff including kitchen, bathroom, and laundry. (2) Assumes 10 gallons per year per sq. ft of irrigable area with 25% in peak -month or 0.08 gallons per day applied to the $4.52 per gallon per day. 365 Raftelis developed two alternative wastewater capacity fee assessment alternatives as follows: Alternative 1 o Maintains existing assessment categories and updates the anticipated gallon per day use in the peak day; applies the updated unit cost of $16.24 per gallon per day of wastewater facility capacity. o 2 bedroom and greater per dwelling unit updated o Apartment and 1 -bedroom unit fees with and without laundry per dwelling unit updated. Alternative 2 o Establishes a separate assessment schedule for residential (including multi -family). o Residential assessment includes fee based on the number of bedrooms through 3 bedrooms and an incremental fee for each additional bedroom o Non-residential assessment of fees same as Alternative 1 In developing the adopted capacity fees, Raftelis, Nelson Engineering and Town staff evaluated indoor water use for different residential and non-residential land uses. Note that there are additional categories proposed where an existing category did not exist, but where the Town is anticipating future development. Table 1-16 summarizes the existing wastewater capacity fees and assessment criteria by development type. The assumed gallon per day by type reflects a review of assessment categories updating previously assumed water use and for many categories, the expected use per day has been modified. The previous assumptions have been in place for several years. The adopted wastewater capacity fee assesses residential customers solely based on the number of bedrooms regardless of the type of residential unit. ..11L µ �.2 JWIII. III �� fi Ad III':...:°°'u� "� and IC ur°ulmeunl Wastewater Ca paoliit:Y ss ~"s;suI" twul""ml III""me^d Apartment, Studio or 1 BR Residential Unit (2BR) Residential Unit (3BR) Residential Unit Each Additional BR Unfinished Habitable Space Bars, Tavern and Lounge (no food) Restaurants (full service) Restaurants (paper service only - no dishes) Restaurants (single service) Caterers Motels and Hotels Bed and Breakfast Assembly (no food) Assembly (w/ food) RV Parks (w ind. Sewer hookups) Camps, Parks, Campgrounds (w/ comfort station) Mobile Home Park Laundry (self service) Laundry (commercial 100#pp capacity) Breweries (per annual production 1 barrel is 31 gals. Fitness (Gyms, Dance Studies, Yoga, Karate) Medical Offices and Dentists Veterinary Offices (not including boarding) Animal Boarding Offices Retail Stores Unfinished Commercial Space Public Access Restrooms Service Stations Car Washes Public Spas, Pools or Hot Tubs (Per legal capacity) Schools (w/ Cafeteria, Gym, and Showers) Schools (w/ Cafeteria, No Gym) Schools (without Cafeteria and Gym) Day Care and Pre School 140 210 280 70 70 20 64 50 30 80 140 140 3 5 100 75 210 450 1,000 20 50 250 250 20 15 5 5 325 220 1,000 10 20 15 10 20 Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Add' 1 BR Per 400 sq. ft. Per 15 sq. ft. Per Seat (1) Per 100 sq. ft. Per Seat (1) Per 100 sq. ft. Per Room Per Room Per 5 sq. ft. Net Per 15 sq. ft. Net Per Site Per Site Per Site Per Machine Min. /Machine Per Gal. Ann. Capacity Per 100 sq. ft. Per Practitioner Per Practitioner Per Cage Per Employee Per 1,000 sq. ft. Per 1,000 sq. ft. Per Fixture Per Pump Per Bay Per 50 sq. ft. Gross Per Student Per Student Per Student Per Student Others Not Listed Wastewater Service Avg. Max GPD x $16.24 (1) 15 square feet per seat net anticipated for full service or single service restaurants. $1,088 2,172 2,172 N/A N/A 297 399 N/A N/A N/A 985 1,116 24 36 493 369 2,174 1,486 5,435 ICB N/A 614 N/A N/A 147 24 N/A 1,088 4,927 N/A 98 N/A N/A 98 Adopt $2,274 3,410 4,547 1,137 1,137 325 1,039 812 487 1,299 2,274 2,274 49 81 1,624 1,218 3,410 7,308 16,240 325 812 4,060 4,060 325 244 81 81 5,278 3,573 16,240 162 325 244 162 325 EI) IIII" ' Ell A IC; II" : II M . 'WEE EE CI: III II * II " II".iii. Il b IIIIIIII I NS II ''tiP II ?,E) "E" II'kii. Il '" II R II:) "~I WII II ' a II ' II'Ii ii 4 11'",1111I) tl,; "I 11""I' 11 II k. II''.i S II III:" "Iii"" Raftelis completed a variety of capacity fee impacts comparing the adopted to the current fees. Tables 1-17 and 1-18 summarize residential water and wastewater capacity fees under current and adopted fees by customer profile. Residential development profiles include: Home A: 3 bedroom, 7,500 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 3/4 -inch water meter. Home B: 4 bedroom, 12,500 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 1 -inch water meter. Home C: 5 bedroom, 15,000 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 1 -inch water meter. Home D: 2 bedroom, 5,000 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 3/4 -inch water meter. 1aII IIIe 11 7 III......... ui°�� I II �.� ui m ou���. and �w �w� �:�� 1 III'1�� Iii�l ui�ilii� III ���i�ui� Cao: IIC'�,�t�;� III i.1 �:�w�u�°�uu� ui� Ill i11i� iii lll . III ..m 114 y y Home A Home B Home C Home D Outdoor $ 690 $1,266 $1,640 $2,906 1,227 1,582 2,734 4,316 1,227 1,898 3,281 5,179 690 949 1,094 2,043 111 � Ill lll 1-18: 111111111111x7 .1111F IlleCurrent: aui rt aI III' Ill 111u,sliititmunllii Ill lAtastew l°euiIT C Prof111111e Home A Home B Home C Home D $ 2,172 2,172 2,172 2,172 A ed $4,547 4,547 4,547 4,547 •111ty Fees Illy Cu t ° coo no :,„„„t Statt • f. The Town retained Raftelis to complete a financial plan, cost -of -service, and rate study for the Town's water and sewer utilities. Raftelis and Town staff evaluated a 10 -year financial planning period spanning from Fiscal Year (FY3) 2020 through FY 2029 (Study Period). The scope of service included the following major deliverables: Develop separate water and sewer fund financial plans for the 10 -year Study Period. Evaluate separate water and sewer rate revenue adjustments for the Study Period necessary to fund annual revenue requirements, maintain adequate cash reserves, and provide appropriate debt service coverage. Complete a separate water and sewer class cost -of -service analysis using a single (FY 2022) test -year. Propose water and sewer rates by customer class for FY 2022 effective July 1, 2021. Complete a comprehensive evaluation of the Town's water and sewer capacity fees, including alternative assessment approaches. Propose water and sewer capacity fees effective July 1, 2021, with proposed annual adjustments for inflation as reflected within the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI) for Denver thereafter. In addition to updating the implementation date to July 1, 2021, estimated actual financial results from FY 2020 was incorporated into the financial planning and cost -of -service models adjusted for inflation starting in FY 2021. The multi -year water financial plan, supporting worksheets and calculations, revenue projections, and assumptions are detailed in Appendix A. The multi -year sewer financial plan, supporting worksheets and calculations, revenue projections, and assumptions are detailed in Appendix E. ate The Town established a Citizen Rate Committee (CRC) to assist Town Council in the review of study findings and recommendations. The CRC assisted Raftelis, Nelson Engineering and Town Staff to review, develop, and refine preliminary and final study findings and recommendations as part of the study. For example, Raftelis initially proposed a uniform seasonal water volume rate structure as a more gradual step into tiered rate structures, but the CRC and Town staff preferred inclining block tiered rate approaches for residential customers. There were a total of seven meetings with the CRC and a report discussing the process and outcomes is included in Appendix I. 'Refers to the year at the end of the fiscal year (e.g., FY 2022 is the period ending June 30, 2022). "I" :; II M 4":) II"' , II 4, II" ! :b 11 '4 . 0110 II * II " II'Iiii 11-1111E NS 11V 1111E, WA"11' 111E II? A I1IN II"'.'s S EENV 11E II ' I. I'? II " II"'k. II II II" CA II '^, A'0,II II a II " II""i III. 'II' A. iff:'l. W. f f"VIII:°11111.1 1l On behalf of the project team, we would like to acknowledge the commitment and contributions provided by several members of the Town in completing this project. In particular, we would like to recognize the Town staff of Brian Lenz, Johnny Ziem, and Kelly Thompson and Nelson Engineering team members Bob Norton and Matt Bowers and Nelson Engineering sub -consultant Alex Norton for their support, data development, insights, interim reviews, and overall assistance as part of the Study. 2„,„ . f f f .ff f. During this project, the Town, Nelson Engineering, and the Nelson Engineering sub -consultant provided Raftelis with a variety of technical information from capital improvement program, assets, operational to audited and unaudited financial reports, meter, billing data, and revenue data. Raftelis assessed the information for errors and reasonableness but did not independently assess or test for the accuracy of such data, historic or projected. We have relied on this data in the formulation of our findings and subsequent recommendations, as well as in the preparation of this report. As is often the case, there will be differences between actual and projected data. Some of the assumptions used in this report will not be realized and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Therefore, there are likely to be differences between the data or results projected in this report and actual results achieved; these differences may be material. As such, we take no responsibility for the accuracy of data or projections provided by or prepared on behalf of the Town, nor do we have any responsibility for updating this report for events occurring after the date of this report. tili se 1712:1"1711 The Town maintains a water system which consists of: ter 7 active wells Network of water transmission and distribution pipelines with diameter sizes ranging from 4 -inches to 18 -inches 3 pump stations 3 treated water storage tanks Nelson Engineering completed a capacity study evaluation of the Towns water system documented within the Town of Jackson Water / Sewer Systems Evaluation report dated June 2021. For the cost -of -service evaluation the inventory of linear feet by diameter size was converted to inch -feet and used in development of the unit cost by service category and customer class. Raftelis separated the Town's water transmission and distribution system into common -to -all and local categories. Transmission (Common -to -all): 10 -inch and larger Distribution (Local): 8 -inch and smaller le 1 ILLilt The Town currently served an estimated 3,927 water customers amongst Residential, Multi -Family, Commercial, Irrigation -Only, Government, Schools and those located within 3 Creek in FY 2020. Table 3-1 summarizes FY 2020 customer accounts and water use by customer class. Illl llltm 3-"1 I'l2 20201 INateulm ,ist roI ?or III'°ia1 Residential Multi Family Commercial Irrigation Only Government Schools 3 Creek Total 2,738 187 790 10 74 25 113 3,927 Hied s 276,412 91,390 354,454 74,589 21,698 6,404 42.620 872,277 II" .) WII M ': IF , II A IC 0110 112113.11E II b II '.ii. M S II ' 'i II VAN II"' II'.iii. III'" A, IN II' II II II ' II " II"'k. a IIMII II" „,, P , 112 A II I 9 II: "9 Customer classes that have the highest ratio of peak season water use to winter period water use are more expensive to serve as they require infrastructure to be installed for only a portion of the year which is idle capacity the remainder of the year. Figure 3-1 summarizes FY 2019 monthly water use consumption by customer class. L40 aV 1.0) 6 0 o 40 w�. 20 I Iiii3 w � � ul�e C, � IIC: : C" �.. 0 "�9w � III o uI °uI t, III y 111 1 1111 1 1 111 1 1 111 1 111 1 1 11 » , R I/r Sch I Sys", 7 IC °lOv The Town maintains a sewer system which consists of: er Use by Customer CIO( e C re e oo Gov v is MFR No C:orya Jff S Wastewater treatment plant Network of sewer interceptor and collection system pipelines with diameter sizes ranging from 6 - inches to 18 -inches 7 lift stations Over 1,400 manholes For the cost -of -service evaluation the inventory of linear feet by diameter size was converted to inch -feet and used in development of the unit cost by service category and customer class. Raftelis separated the Town's water transmission and distribution system into common -to -all and local categories. Interceptor (Common -to -all): 10 -inch and larger Collection (Local): 8 -inch and smaller The Town currently serves approximately 4,610 sewer customers amongst Residential, Multi -Family, Commercial, Government, School and customers located within Melody Ranch, Rafter J, Adams Canyon Sewer District, Valley View, 3 Creek, or developments served wholesale services by the Town. Table 3-1 summarizes projected FY 2020 accounts and billed wastewater volume for each customer class. Outside Town customers are grouped based on location and service type. lbIlII 2 2 10"""'Y 202,0 Sewer Cuuustorner Data. Residential Multi Family Commercial Government School Melody (1) Rafter 1 (1) 3 Creek (1) Contract (2) 2,740 161 767 58 21 356 446 108 17 120,769 53,483 304,472 19,547 6,807 18,688 47,001 10,973 63,858 Sewer Only (1) 13 5.601 Total 4,691 651,578 (1) Outside Town customers provided full service. (2) Outside Town provided wholesale service. Sewer volumes per user have declined compared to levels experienced as recent as a decade ago for many utilities because of multiple factors including an increasing prevalence of higher -efficiency water -using fixtures and overall conservation efforts by the utility and the utility's water and sewer customers. The use of overly optimistic demand forecast based on outdated assumptions regarding customer water consumption characteristics and/or future customer account growth can result in unrealistic revenue projections and severe utility financial distress. We projected a continued downward annual adjustment of 1.0% to Residential, Multi -Family Residential, and other full -service customer billed wastewater volume use per account annually throughout the Study Period. Table 3-3 summarizes the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Class designation by customer type. Class 1 is "domestic" and Class II through VII include higher concentrations assessed an additional surcharge per 1,000 gallons of billed wastewater. The assumed strength for Class I through Class VII and by customer class in milligrams per liter (mg / 1) are detailed in Appendix H. (!) II M ()IF, J A 0 IIVI II * II " II'kii. II b II"k. ISM S WA "11" II'kii. II? A Ihfl II;) 11"?" II " II"'k. ,fik IIMII A II ^" d.. , II II IIIsIII.„ri 3003 °°'lIC°°swuis III'i:3 aOOC and 1°i Iiipuimailii °uIns IIs3 (3uslc um uui "'lICuuly4 e Residential Non -Residential / Default Dry Cleaning Meat Processing Restaurant and Bakeries Commercial Laundry Fast Food and Canning Hotel / Motel w/ Food Service Market w/ Deli Kennels and Mortuary Commercial Printing Auto Service Repair School Cafe Hotel / Motel w/o Food Service Photo Processing Car Washes Hospital w/o Food Service Hospital w Food Service Breweries wb.A„ ism�3 1 1 Sampling 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 6 1 1 Sampling 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 Annual water and sewer customer growth for Town residential, multi -family, and commercial customers are projected to grow 2.2% annually in FY 2020 and FY 2021, declining to 1.1% annually in FY 2022 through FY 2030. 3 Creek water customer account growth was estimated at 6.6% in FY 2020 and projected to be 3.5% in FY 2021 declining to 1.7% per year FY 2022 through FY 2030. No growth is expected for other customers located outside the Town. 3 Creek customer account growth is 1.0% in FY 2020, 4.0% in FY 2021 declining to 1.1% per year FY 2022 through FY 2030. Many 3 Creek water customers install irrigation -only metering devices to separate meter water used outdoor as well as install irrigation -only services in advance of home construction which accounts for the difference in customer account growth. Town staff completed an audit of 3 Creek customers as growth continued during the COVID-19 pandemic and usage per account can be significant. The rate design and cost of service analysis reflect the more recent 3 Creek water customer information by meter size. Table 3-4 summarizes the accounts by meter size and customer class. ."'III""albIlIIe 3 .3 reellll ul i„,tueleul eure Illy IIIVet:eul° '31ii S ! III '1' muI ilb uI 303'. 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch Total 12 2 3 17 39 1 69 109 56 1 13 70 1 1 1 3 108 5 86 199 "T':'sIN (:) II''"' ,11,69k ;II" : Il ""Y P. I110 II*II "IIE III NII"''.i. N' SIIVIl WA II'II'EIII? A hfl V11 II 'I'. I II"OE A INI A II ^° A i II II S 'II"' 9 1 .'"1 The multi -year water financial plan, supporting worksheets and calculations, revenue projections, and assumptions are detailed in Appendix A. The multi -year sewer financial plan, supporting worksheets , revenue projections and assumptions are detailed in Appendix E. The water and sewer utility financial plans are organized around a total fund with separate operations and capital improvement subfunds. The respective water and sewer rate revenue requirements represent the cost of providing service and include O&M expenses, debt service obligations, and other cash inflows and outflows. All capital costs are assigned to the water and sewer capital improvement subfunds, where funding is provided from capacity fee revenues, interest income, and transfers from the operations subfund, net bond proceeds, and grants (subject to award). The only expenses in the capital improvement subfund are capital improvement expenditures. The financial plan evaluates the adequacy of system revenues adjusted for customer and demand -related growth to: Fund annual O&M expenses, debt service, and capital expenditures, and Maintain the following financial performance thresholds: o Exceed DSC ratio of at least 1.30 times annual debt service, o Exceed water fund cash reserve targets of ■ 50% (180 days) of annual O&M expenses PLUS ■ the average annual cash -funded capital project expenses separated set for FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. o Exceed sewer fund cash reserve targets of ■ 50% (180 days) of annual O&M expenses PLUS ■ the average annual cash -funded capital project expenses separated set for FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. Raftelis recommends that the Town establish rates to exceed a DSC ratio of at least 1.30 times annual debt service. The DSC ratio target is applied to outstanding debt and debt projected to be issued over the Study Period to fund capital projects. At present, the Town is required to maintain a minimum debt service coverage of 1.00 times annual debt service on the outstanding water debt obligations. This requirement is based on the gross revenues of the system which include all income, charges, and revenues derived directly or indirectly by the Town from the operation and use of the water and sewer systems, including rates, charges, and other fees such as capacity fees less annual O&M expenses. For planning purposes, as revenues include both one-time SDFs and weather and growth dependent sales that may fluctuate year -over -year, Raftelis recommends the more conservative DSC ratio target minimum for rate setting purposes. Furthermore, the Town's water and sewer demands are affected by seasonal visitors and subject to additional fluctuations. Raftelis recommends that the Town maintain cash reserve target equal to 50% of O&M expenses plus capital reserves calculated based on the average annual cash -funded capital. The Town should review cash reserve policies periodically and adjust reserve policies when warranted to mitigate the risk of unplanned operational contingencies, capital expenses, and potential fluctuations in volume sales revenue. If system revenues are not adequate to fund annual expenditures and exceed financial performance requirements, the following four variables are used to balance the financial plan: Draw down accumulated reserves to fund annual expenditures until funds are depleted. Issue debt to fund a portion of annual capital improvements. Increase user charges. Delay and defer annual capital improvements. While rate revenue increases are currently projected annually over the Study Period, adjustments may be necessary depending on future CIP expenditures, system growth, water use patterns, inflation, and regulatory requirements. At a minimum, annual reviews as part of the budget process should be used to periodically assess the condition of the water and sewer funds to determine the necessity of future rate revenue adjustments. A comprehensive update is recommended every three to five years unless a major event dictates more frequent updates. ;Li t ooAl''71 Water user charge revenue is projected to be $2.37 million in FY 2020 and is projected to increase to $5.15 million by FY 2029. Figure 4-1 summarizes proposed water rate revenue increases during the Study Period that are necessary to fund annual expenditures and meet financial performance criteria. The proposed FY 2022 water rates, which are based on an 8.0% overall rate revenue adjustment, are detailed in Section 5.2 of this report. It should be noted that these increases do not necessarily equate to the overall rate revenue increases for a specific customer class or individual customer. (,;) A iI ,; II ' IC:b II M . 'AND IIII" II " II'IIIIII IIIIIIII NI S II IIII III , WA III'Iiii II"? A, I11'4 D VW 11"?..,AwS IIIIIIII A IIeN A IF' i , II II k . 'll"' 9 OD"' I:IigUre 4,41: II ° rarer ed ul""mul t„lalll ataMul Rate OR" Veul""mitrP increases 8% 8%© ©% 2021 2022 2 23 9% 9% 2 24 2 125 MI Adopted FY 2022 Effective fUpy 1, 2021 Water rate increases are anticipated to be effective July 1St of each year. Figure 4-2 shows the end -of -fiscal year cash balance and reserves for the water fund. The cash reserve targets are exceeded throughout the Study Period. The cash reserve targets are exceeded throughout the Study Period with projected end -of -year cash balances just above the target in FY 2029. t Ilh.° ul�, �,�ul �.�. III to ..�:��: it $6 0 $5 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I °°ll°°ctt IllWater III°°°°u ul ct IIIE ul d toirYttaul^ i" maa I II m Illlllt a.III a ul e a a °toll i III'i. e rye Targets 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 =Adopted FY 2022 Effective July 1, 2021 — Cash Reserve Target - Adopted FY 2022 Effective July 1, 2021 Figure 4-3 shows the projected water fund legal and target DSC ratios compared to the target which are exceeded each year of the Study Period. II'°'IIIgt.N! rr. 4-'i'µ III uI"ujealed A ur1mul°°ul1.walll lAiater 10'1d III'a«I l,,,', 7I0 600% 500% 400% 300% 200% 100% 0% 2020 2021 2022 2023 2 4 2 25 202 27 2028 2029 NM Adopted FY 2022 Effective July 1, 202°ll. —Target arget —Legal Requirement 114 "Iota III Water III"' d All water fund revenues and expenditures are summarized on page A-1. For financial planning purposes, Raftelis developed two different subfunds within the water fund: an operations subfund and a capital improvement subfund as previously discussed. A total water fund balance of approximately $4.78 million was available as of July 1, 2020, including an operating cash reserve minimum of $1.00 million, leaving $3.78 million as unrestricted. Raftelis proposes creating a new capital reserve effective in FY 2022 equal to the average annual cash -funded capital project outlay. To mitigate the effect of this recommendation, the reserve is calculated in two 5 -year increments of FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. Operations subfund is summarized on page A-2, Capital improvement subfund is summarized on page A-4. Water user charge revenues in FY 2021 were projected by Raftelis using historic billing data from FY 2018 and FY 2019, adjusted for growth. Projections for the remainder of the study period are adjusted based on customer growth and developed in a variety of worksheets included in pages A-5 through A-25. Water user charge revenue is projected to range from $2.37 million in FY 2020 to $5.15 million in FY 2029. Proposed water rates are discussed in Section 5.2. Capacity fees are one-time capital recovery fees assessed to new or increased development. The water capacity fees are expected to make a significant contribution to the funding of growth -related capital improvement program expenditures. The forecasted capacity fee receipts reflect the customer account (.F NV NI O3 II'"' , II A CIF, ONFIN, d°:L ION , V OA IN III'" II iii II II IIIIIIII a II"IV II II' OE IIh" A IN D "wN FENN II 11 111 II"?, II"' ONO: �.' FIN,II"'' AC III II P II " II I 114. "II' N II: "9 growth assumptions previously discussed. Proposed water capacity fees are discussed in greater detail in Section 8 of this report. Capacity fee revenue is projected to range from $0.12 million in FY 2020 to $0.21 million in FY 2029 incorporating proposed changes to capacity fees effective July 1, 2021 and adjusted annually for inflation. Capacity fees were evaluated and Study recommendations are detailed in Section 8. The water fund has other miscellaneous fee and charge revenues such as new account charges, non-payment turnoff fees, water meter charges, carriage fees, hydrant, and construction sale of water, and interest earnings. Interest earnings are projected based on the average annual cash balance and an interest earnings rate of 2.5%. Combined miscellaneous revenues average $60.920 per year adjusted for 2.0% inflation throughout the Study Period. The water fund miscellaneous revenues are listed in detail on page A-25. 'open, l° Iiio n a nd III III Iii In te on a Ince Page A-8 summarizes projected utility O&M expenditures over the Study Period. Projected O&M expenditures are based on the Town's line -item 2020 and 2021 budgets and adjusted for anticipated cost increases and inflation, ranging from $1.99 million in FY 2020 to $3.02 million by FY 2029. The following annual cost inflations are assumed for O&M expense categories over the Study Period. Materials: 5.0% Personnel: 5.0% Benefits: 5.0% • Supplies: 5.0% • Operating: 5.0% • Utility: 5.0% » Services: 3.0% Other: 3.0% Indirect Costs: 5.0% Capital: 7.0% 1 .4 C 114. Iii I II II II m III'^ ui Oye ui.iu nt IOP ii 'oj cts The projects listed in the CIP were provided by Town staff in 2021 dollars for the years FY 2020 through FY 2029. The CIP totals $22.41 million, adjusted for inflation. The detailed project listing on pages A-9 through A-10 includes the dollar amount in current year and inflated dollars based on the anticipated year expended over the Study Period. The financial plan and capital funding incorporate the inflated CIP amounts based on the anticipated timing of the projects and an assumed capital inflation rate of 7.0% applied starting in FY 2022. Figure 4-4 shows the Study Period water capital projects totaling $22.41 million comprised of $10.07 in project new debt and $12.34 million cash -funded CIP by year. $6 c 0 $5 $4 $3 $2 so 2020 u.0 ore Al ,l 1Nate ur i' a III Iii l e III III': ' ul- j III III Il: Ira "acted l"m f iil:e I';.:1,110 111 111 2022 2 23 2024 2125 2026 11 2028 21129 02I Cash Fun ed • Debt Funded Major CIP projects include: Well #9 - $1.38 million design and construction (FY 2022 to FY 2023) Gregory Lane - $1.17 million design and construction (FY 2022 to FY 2024) Zone 3 Tank - $8.70 million design and construction (FY 2024 to FY 2026) Powderhorn - $1.25 million design and construction (FY 2027 to FY 2029) Snow King - $1.51 million design and construction (FY 2027 to FY 2029) The water fund has two existing debt obligations associated with a 1997 loan to be repaid in FY 2023 and a 2010 note to be repaid in FY 2010. Three additional debt issues are projected in FY 2022, FY 2024 and FY 2026 as summarized below. FY 2022 - FY 2023 bundled into one $1.38 million debt issue in 2022. FY 2024 - FY 2025 bundled into one $4.50 million debt issue in 2024. FY 2026 - FY 2027 bundled into one $4.20 million debt issue in 2026. Projected debt is assumed at a 30 -year term and includes issuance costs of 2.0% funded from the proceeds of the debt issue, and 4.0% interest rates. 1 1f"1.(' l:l:f f1°`l. 1 1 FY 2020 sewer user charge revenue is projected to be $2.45 million. Figure 4-1 summarizes proposed sewer rate revenue increases during the Study Period that are necessary to fund annual expenditures and meet financial performance criteria. The proposed 2022 sewer rates based on 5.0% overall rate revenue adjustments are detailed in Section 6.2 of this report. "I"O ,IIe II" '"d°: IAN, V Il p II " IIR" 11'11'11 11 ".11 II"1': I114ie II V 1111 111 , WA II"' 11'11'11 II " AIIeRII") S 1111111NV 11111111 II I'^Ia,A 11"' II"'1'11 d"'d IIMIIII d, All""I' A (I II II I "1 1111 "II"' 9 Ild"9 I IIIgu .e ,S 111 tur 0000 „, locoo,00,mool A u-ur i" tJa Seweor IIIS ale III° event„,mm.m IIIui"mau easf. e 6% 6% 6/, 0% 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Sewer rate increases are also effective July 1St of each year. Figure 4-2 shows the end -of -year cash balance and reserves for the sewer combined fund. The cash reserve targets are exceeded throughout the Study Period. ui wlbJure gt Ill llr(o leet.e � otd..11l Bever I ll "'mmui" d III ui"mm� ei 'I'm e, oo m, lll"m III lalll noes and III'te e vs .. III � �� � A M A $5.2 $4 9 $4.1 $4.0 $3.1 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 ouuuu1First increases adopted to be effective July 1, 2021 —Cash Reserve Target - Forst increases adopted to be effective Juuiy 1, 2021 No sewer debt is outstanding or anticipated to be issued over the Study Period. 1 u "rota III Seweoir IIP"'v<raauiid All water fund revenues and expenditures are summarized on page E-1. For financial planning purposes, Raftelis developed two different subfunds within the sewer fund: an operations subfund and a capital improvement subfund as previously discussed. A total water fund balance of approximately $4.74 million was available as of July 1, 2020, including an operating cash reserve minimum of $1.02 million, leaving $3.72 million as unrestricted. Raftelis proposes creating a new capital reserve effective in FY 2022 equal to the average annual cash -funded capital project outlay. To mitigate the effect of this recommendation, the reserve is calculated in two 5 -year increments of FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. Operations subfund is summarized on page E-2 and Capital improvement subfund is summarized on page E-4. 4 2 1 2 1112eve FY 2020 user charge revenues were adjusted based on estimated actual results provided in July 2020. FY 2021 user charge revenues were projected by Raftelis using historic FY 2018 and FY 2019 billing data from, adjusted for projected growth. Projections for the remainder of the study period are adjusted based on customer growth and developed in a variety of worksheets included in pages E-4 through E-8. Sewer user charge revenue is projected to range from $2.45 million in FY 2020 to $3.99 million in FY 2029. Proposed sewer rates are discussed in Section 5.2.2. Capacity fees are one-time capital recovery fees assessed to new or increased development to recover the cost of system capacity necessary to serve customers. Proposed sewer capacity fees are discussed in Section 8 of this report. Capacity fee revenue is projected to range from $0.43 million in 2020 to $1.74 million in FY 2029. The sewer fund has only a few miscellaneous fee and charge revenues listed on page E-2. Miscellaneous revenues were budgeted to be $60,000 in FY 2020 and projected to increase at 1.0% per year. Interest earnings are projected based on the average annual cash balance and an interest earnings rate of 2.5%. 1 3 Op e ratIii o ul ms � Iii In tt nna n ce Page E-8 summarizes projected utility O&M expenditures over the Study Period. Projected O&M expenditures are based on the Town's line -item 2020 and 2021 budgets and adjusted for anticipated cost increases and inflation, ranging from $2.04 million in FY 2020 to $2.97 million by FY 2029. „) Materials: 5.0% Personnel: 5.0% Benefits: 5.0% Supplies: 5.0% „r Operating: 5.0% Utility: 5.0% Services: 3.0% Other: 3.0% Indirect Costs: 5.0% Capital: 7.0% 4„„,2„,1„,„4„, Co op Iii La I II 00 ul m III rev uu nt re sots The projects listed in the CIP were provided by Town staff in 2020 dollars for the years FY 2020 through FY 2029. The CIP totals $8.90 million, adjusted for inflation. The detailed project listing on pages E-9 and E-10 "I" :VD IN IN M iICI II S 0 II M . II" P. III II * II " II'kii. II b IIIIIIII NI S II ' + IIIIIII WAII"' IIIIIIII ID A N D I IIIII II II II I 11"^D II" II'Ii ii ONO) II'^°AC II 1INNI IF' S II"' 9 includes the dollar amount in current year and inflated dollars based on the anticipated year expended over the Study Period. The financial plan and capital funding incorporate the inflated CIP amounts based on the anticipated timing of the projects and an assumed capital inflation rate of 7.0% applied starting in FY 2021. Figure 4-4 shows the annual sewer capital projects broken down by funding source. OF":' pttui gl Se, or alp talll °Projects a rod Ill ui wi wµ^iwd pap ialll III ii uui n °l lii ui p $2.5 c 0 2 $2.0 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 HO Cash Funded ■ Debt Funded Major CIP projects include: Gregory Lane Sewer - $1.21 million design and construction (FY 2022 through FY 2024) West Cache - $0.58 million design (FY 2021) Hillside Townhomes - $0.84 million design and construction (FY 2023 through FY 2025) Powderhorn Lane - $1.09 million (FY 2027 through FY 2029) IlDebt aui, m IIII' e bit Se st e The Town has no outstanding sewer fund debt. No additional debt is anticipated to be issued over the Study Period to fund identified capital improvements. Raftelis completed a cost -of -service analysis for a FY 2022 test -year to identify customer, base, and extra capacity costs. Detailed calculations are presented in Appendix C. 5.1,.11 ,. OVIER II E ;,'''' ' IF T IHI E TER COST- IF -SERVICE IP CIE S The purpose of a cost -of -service study is to allocate the water utility revenue requirement to each customer class in direct proportion to the demands they impose on the utility system. To accomplish this objective, Raftelis conducted a detailed analysis of customer water consumption characteristics and engaged in a multi -step cost allocation process. The procedures followed by Raftelis were based on the industry standard "base -extra capacity method" of cost allocations as published by the American Water Works Association in the Seventh Edition of the Manual of Water Supply Practices Ml, Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges. The primary steps in the water cost -of -service study process include the following which essentially functionalize, allocate and distribute the defined or net revenue requirements of the water utility: Costs and Demand: Determining the test -year revenue requirement and forecast billed water consumption. Cost Functionalization: Functionalizing the O&M, capital, and non -rate revenue components of the revenue requirement. This process results in the assignment of costs to the specific water utility functional activities they are incurred to perform. Cost Allocation: Allocating the functionalized O&M, capital, and non -rate revenue components of the revenue requirement to specific cost parameters such as base demand, maximum day demand, and maximum hour demand. This process results in the assignment of costs to the specific types of water service they are incurred to serve. Units of Service: Determining the customer class units of service for each cost parameter based on metrics such as annual average day billed usage, maximum day and maximum hour extra capacity demand, the number of equivalent meters, and annual number of water bills. Unit Cost -of -Service: Determining the utility -wide unit cost -of -service for each cost parameter. The unit cost -of -service is determined by dividing the revenue requirement assigned to each cost parameter by its associated utility -wide units of service. (:)INIIM (':) II""' ,III lc 0 110 11* II " II'.iii. Il b ll'.ii. I N S II 'V "11" II"? AIIORII:) III III II ' 11"?.A."11" ' 11 11 11" C:AIIPA',II S Customer Class Revenue Requirements: Distributing the total revenue requirement by multiplying the customer class specific units of service for each cost parameter by the associated utility -wide unit cost -of -service. 5.1. A'TI UTILITY FY 2022 ITVUI I UIIIRIEIRlllI T The total 2022 financial plan revenue requirement of $3.71 million consists of $2.18 million in O&M expenses and $1.53 million in capital costs. These costs are partially offset by $0.96 in non -rate revenues, reserves, and external debt proceeds. Water user charge revenues of $2.75 million are required to fund the remaining revenue requirements as summarized in Table 5-1 and detailed on page C-1. Tra. Ole 5-1 Wa1 or IF uuiuu,l 1115eve n use III'°Rep,u,ul ii oreore sle nts O&M Expenses Capital Costs Other Cash (Inflows) / Outflows Increase (Decrease) in Cash Reserves Water User Charge Revenues 20 o / to $2.18 M 1.53 M (1.73 M) 0.77 M $2.75 M . .. IE I,CLASSIPIEAI II a FA T IRS A water utility system cannot be designed, constructed, or operated merely to meet the average day demands imposed by customers. Instead, it must be designed, constructed, and operated to meet total system maximum day and maximum hour peak demands imposed by customers. These peak demands occur on a single day or during a single hour each year and are significantly greater than typical average day demands. The maximum day to average day demand peaking factor of 2.40 and a maximum hour to average day demand peaking factor of 4.00 based on 10% above actual FY 2019 peaking factors. This was reviewed with Town and Nelson Engineer staff and was deemed reasonable. The approach used by Raftelis to estimate customer maximum day and maximum hour peaking factors is like that described in Appendix A of the AWWA Manual M1. Raftelis utilized 2019 billing data, adjusted as previously discussed, and the results of this process are shown in Figure 5-1. These estimated peaking factors were used by Raftelis to establish the maximum day and maximum hour extra capacity units of service for each customer class as used in the cost -of -service study. These extra capacity units of service are a key driver of the allocation of the revenue requirement for each customer class. OF' 'i , °l III';:acW :�r III"":""91 20'19 ter i„use �.w ore 0 �� � w� a is uI°a �!m uI� �'„ �� .� �;III Iu 4.71 1 89 3.15 2.11 DIDIDIDIDI� 'ax, Dy , a k i n g c. 5.45 3'51 3.27 is Max 4.08 2.45 2.55 1.53 our i ea king ctor 6.93 Due to the peak demands they impose on a water utility system, customer classes that have higher maximum day and maximum hour peaking factors generally make a large proportional contribution to the coincident peak demands experienced by a utility, i.e., place greater summer season demands on the system. As a result, through of the cost -of -service process, they are allocated a larger proportional share of the water utility revenue requirement. 5.1.4. I ;° E ULTS F THE T- F- lEIRVIICIE STUDY The goal of a cost -of -service study is to implement user charges that equitably recover the cost of providing service to each customer class. Thus, the critical question the cost -of -service study process attempts to answer is: do the user charge revenues collected from each customer class correspond to the cost of providing service? If the answer to this question is no, it indicates that one or more customer classes are not making a fair and equitable contribution to the utility's overall revenue recovery. Customer classes include additional separated customer groupings of customers were evaluated (e.g., irrigation -only) separately for the cost -of -service analysis. Some of these customer groupings were consolidated for purposes of rate setting. As shown in Table 5-2, the projected FY 2022 user charge revenue recovery for each water customer class does not match the calculated FY 2022 cost -of -service. Specifically, residential, schools, irrigation -only, and 3 Creek customers are paying too little and commercial and multi -family customers are paying too much relative to the indicated cost -of -service. There are several reasons such an outcome can occur. Typically, if a water utility has not adjusted its cost -of -service user charges for a significant period, a misalignment between revenue recovery and the actual cost of providing service can occur due to changes in customer class water consumption characteristics or changes in the composition of the overall utility -wide revenue requirements. The Town also instituted system -wide water volume rates irrespective of customer class except for 3 Creek contract water customers. "I" DV fiD II''"' , II II" S IAN , V OA II w II " II".I''.. II II 11 II V A II ' II"ii'.. II? A ON II II II II"? II"' II"'I'i d?? IIMII II" C A II"''" A 4, II "11""f II ' II" IIIE 5'11' 9 II: "'I Table 5-2 shows the results of the FY 2022 cost -of -service analysis aggregating the classes into their respective current rate structure designations. II Ill lll w2 2 III "' 2022 C 1„ °IIC ni' Ill: µ 1.JllliS Residential Multi -Family Commercial Irrigation -Only School $1,159,457 222,276 789,649 223,913 23,639 3 Creek 318,950 Outside Town 9.114 Total 2,746,998 Rat $863,851 236,280 973,904 158,129 11,187 271,012 11.502 $2,525,865 $295,606 (14,004) (184,255) 65,785 12,452 47,938 18% (2,388) (21%) $221,133 9% The water user charge design process allows utility governing bodies to determine how they wish to recover the cost -of -service study -derived revenue requirement from rates from each customer class. Generally, utility governing bodies have significant discretion to achieve specific financial, water conservation or public policy objectives via the water rate design process. Raftelis and Town staff reviewed various rate design alternatives that achieve the required revenue requirement for the water utility. The recommended rates achieve system -wide cost -of -service rates in FY 2022 and improve customer class cost -of -service recovery for each customer class and future rate adjustments will be necessary to achieve full customer class cost -of - service recovery. Appendix D includes more detailed information related to the recommended rates. 5.2.1. II 'III '; I , 'TI S The Town's current water user charges have been in place since January 1, 2015 and are shown in Tables 5-3 and 5-4. The existing water rate structure includes inside and outside city rates, a monthly service charge that increases by meter size that is applicable to all customer classes and system -wide uniform volumetric charges. . IRATE S'TI UC'TUIRIE ILTI ICJ TII Raftelis developed three rate alternatives for the FY 2022 test -year that are calculated to be "revenue - neutral", meaning the same level of revenue as calculated in the financial plan is projected to be generated under each alternative. However, the revenue will be recovered differently between classes under each alternative. Raftelis worked with Town staff to develop three water rate alternatives. The following recommendations are integrated within one or more alternatives: Establish a stand-alone customer class for Irrigation -only customers. Irrigation -only customers as a class typically exert the highest peak demands; creating a separate class is consistent with providing pricing signals for the efficient use of water. Assess a monthly base charge by meter size to Irrigation -only customers. Irrigation -only customers incur meter reading, meter replacement, customer service, and billing like other accounts and assessing a base charge recovers these costs. Incorporate a minimum volume allowance for all customers to provide more guaranteed revenue stream for low volume uses and when accounts are otherwise using little or no water. This promotes equity amongst all users as utility infrastructure needs to be maintained and replaced whether the account is an active user. Adopt a tiered volumetric rate, where higher water users pay more for higher volumes of water used; this will improve the conservation pricing signal to promote more efficient water use for discretionary purposes. Apply the same rate structures to 3 Creek as proposed for in -Town Residential customers, while setting unit prices to recover the higher cost of providing service to serve 3 Creek customers. Begin to rebalance the way costs to serve specific customer classes are recovered to make sure everyone is paying their fair share but do this more gradually to avoid rate shock in a single year. The following table summarizes, compares, and contrasts each final water rate alternative. "CalV III ter III'° i . C)lbjectOlve 111Watorlllx t.,toui ll"ul irla y A Irrigation -Only Customer Class Irrigation -Only Pays Base Charge System -Wide Rates Increase Revenue Recovery Via Base Charge Minimum Use Included in Base Charge Conservation Pricing Signal Increased Class Cost of Service Recovery 3 Creek Customer Full Cost Recovery Curr N N Y N N N N Y Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y Y N Y 5.2.3. %iD IPTI ID JULY1, 2I2, 'I I ' I S Raftelis worked with Town staff and the CRC to evaluate the rate structure alternatives and recommend adopting the alternative 3 rates presented above. The adopted rates maintain the existing monthly base rates increasing by meter size and include different volumetric rate by customer classes for Residential, Commercial, and Irrigation -Only which transition closer to customer class cost of service while increasing overall user charges by 8.0%. Table 5-4 presents the current water rates compared to the recommended In - Town rates which are proposed to go into effect July 1, 2021. Separate Commercial and Irrigation -Only customer volume rates reflect a minimum allowance of 2,000 gallons per account and varying uniform volume rates for use over 2,000 gallons. Commercial includes Multi -Family Residential and all Non - Residential customer classes (e.g., Commercial, School, and Government). "II" (!) YVII M ()IF, ,.II Ail,; II" :b II M . "1f" IOVI II * II " II'kii. 11-11 11',,,,E NI S II 'V. WA "'II"' II'kii. II " II ' ' II " II"'k. IIMII II II ^" d.. , II II II"' 9U Tables 5-3 and 5-4 summarize current adopted base charges and residential volume water rates. VIII III . °1Actopt.ed 114''A 2 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch IIh 111 ( d 2 A Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Current $ 7.22 9.93 17.41 18.98 54.54 86.26 159.34 N/A 't or Base Clharges $ 11.00 16.39 28.54 43.61 86.39 132.65 259.66 414.33 d IIC° '°'2' 2i'1u22 III'° sIIId ntIIIi III III Water III'° 1 Allocation 0 - 2,000 2,001 - 6,000 6,001- 25,000 Over 25,000 $2.12 2.12 2.12 2.12 $ 0.00 1.24 2.48 3.72 Figure 5-1 summarizes monthly bills for four residential customer profiles with a 3/4 -inch meter size and 2,000 to 30,000 gallons of water use under the current and adopted FY 2022 rates. $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 "' 1„,1 re 5-2 -Drys Iii o a 111 III n t lla Illy ;Plater ResIii '� a ui l liia III III'iiirl 1 11 111 III ors l' t $71 $39 $18 $11 �uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu Current 2 kgal in 5 kgal $38 $15 Adopted 15 kgal 1111111111 30 kgal $82 Figure 5-3 shows the monthly water bills for a 3/4 -inch Residential using 0 to 30,000 gallons per month under the current and adopted rates. $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 p III' m oliidolll u urea,, () ur.m i �m nIII ,lista°lonelµ I lllll ll IIIIIIIIII Corn llfaaurliim 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Current Adopted Table 5-5 summarizes current adopted multi -family and non-residential volume rates. -IraIllallle 5-5: do air. III try III to 000ll1"""'a orooloIiiIlly oInd III on Ill1"4.esliiy �antIIIia111 Volllmmu11 III': "- Tier 1 Tier 2 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $2.12 $ 0.00 2.12 2.12 Figure 5-4 shows the monthly water bills for five Non -Residential customer profiles with a 1 -inch meter using 10,000 to 100,000 gallons per month under the current and adopted rates. $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 ua ure IM o nah Illy O urn urmme r a liinlll urmo Oh Water IIIyo:o or A Illioi() urner Ill3Iii III III i'.o ur m pa ur° son $42 1111111 � $116 $95 Current $222 $118 $97 iuui ■ $55 Adopted 1 10 kgal tot 15 kgal ou 20 kgal III II III Ii 40 kgal ililil1111 50 kgal mu 100 kgal $224 C) 'eV C) J1 Ail „II 'nd: I)N, V)1" II II'il'i S WA 'II' IF? /4,IF? II) IP.A"'11"'II'il'i A INI AII"A 4; ; 11 11 S'll"'91 11: 1 Figure 5-5 shows the monthly water bills for Irrigation -Only customer with a 1 -inch water meter from 0 to 60,000 gallons of billed consumption under current and adopted monthly service charge and volume rates. ui°i; 5 6 III (:)u, t1hIlIlly INon000llIllol1011,e,00sOldeoloonlllalll l oon IOlonf,mllh.m ter III eter-yu'istouiini ui IIIIIII I Iii III III C or.ui.mlporOOlsor $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 10 20 30 40 50 0 --Current Current --Adopted Table 5-6 summarizes current adopted Irrigation -Only customer volume rates. -111-alb e y aArlo opted 111"".:'°'f 2022 I II r noon n Illy .Auie°me III"'o1. Tier 1 Tier 2 0 — 2,000 Over 2,000 $2.12 $ 0.00 2.12 2.48 60 Figure 5-6 shows the monthly water bills for three Irrigation -Only customer profiles with a 1 -inch meter using 20,000 to 50,000 gallons per month under the current and adopted rates. 111"0 u re 5-6: IIMouro llhIlly III uimlipat l ii )ul III IIIy liiur°uieIII1 Water I II c.ieiu- loOl i Stomeui° 111'1Cµ Iii III III Oeui1r Ill eui li ur°ui $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 so $42 $85 $106 $61 Current Adopted el 20 kgal legal 50 kgal $135 .. 'v "',1'iM. .. f V ..,w Raftelis completed a cost -of -service analysis for a 2022 test -year to identify customer, volume, and extra strength costs. Detailed calculations are presented in Appendix G. 6.11,.11,. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS The total FY 2022 financial plan revenue requirement of $3.11 million consists of $2.16 million in O&M expenses and $0.95 million in capital costs. These costs are partially offset by $0.40 million from other revenue sources as well as $0.18 million decrease in the cash balance of the operations subfund. Sewer user charges revenues of $2.53 million are required to fund the remaining revenue requirements as summarized in Table 6-1 and detailed on page G-1. '111""'albIlle Sewer 1111111"ul.uluieti „„Ilnue III"'''lug illllluireui"n1°ulleuiiI:a O&M Expenses Capital Costs Other Cash (Inflows) / Outflows Increase (Decrease) in Cash Reserves Sewer User Charge Revenues Y 20;22Ci)sit of Service $ 2.16 M 0.95 M (0.40 M) (0.18 M) $ 2.53 M 6.1.2. UNITS IF SIEIRVIICIE Service requirements for each class are based on contributed wastewater volume, accounts, metering, and billing requirements. Page G-8 summarizes estimated FY 2022 class units of service. Wastewater volume consists of two elements: contributed wastewater flow and infiltration/inflow (I/I) from stormwater runoff, snow melt, and/or groundwater that seeps into the wastewater collection and interceptor system. I/I is allocated equally between volume and equivalent meters to reflect that these parameters are dependent on the size of the system and size of pipelines. Contributed wastewater flow is a portion of the annual water use that enters the sanitary wastewater system. Estimates of the contributed volume are based on annualized AWC water use. Annualized wastewater volumes for each customer classification, adjusted for estimated I/I, are summarized on page G- 7; values across all service categories used in the cost -of -service analysis are located on page G-8. 11" .) W II M 4,7) 11""' , II A II" 11,3 0110 II * II"? II'.iii. 11-11 11,:i I NS II WA "11"' 111: ii II'? A IN 113 S 11,EW II II 'l I' ? 11"" II"'k. 4' 11411 II", 4. 11, 4; , II II The Town also incurs customer costs related to local wastewater collectors, meters and services, and billing. Local wastewater collection lines are allocated based on the number of equivalent meters using meter capacity. Meters and services costs are based on equivalent meter replacement costs that vary based on water meter size. Billing costs are the same for each bill regardless of service requirements. .1.3. ILL A'Ill ST C I-,IP INIEIN'TS There are three basic wastewater system cost components evaluated: volume, strength, and customer costs. Volume costs are directly related to the quantity of billed wastewater flow. Strength costs include three categories of wastewater strength: BOD, TSS, and TKN. Customer costs include a portion of local collection system costs, meters and services, and customer accounting and billing. 6.1.4. ALL*rCATII T AIL IP AIN IN' .`: Various functions or processes are involved in conveying and treating wastewater influent to meet environmental standards that apply to both operating and capital costs. The following functional cost categories were evaluated as part of the sewer cost of service analysis: Treatment: includes wastewater treatment plant -related assets Interceptor: includes constructed water lines that are 10 -inches and greater in diameter Collector: includes constructed water lines that are less than 10 -inches in diameter Meters & Services: includes meter reading costs Customer Accounting, Meter, and Billing: includes billing and customer service -related costs Raftelis grouped existing assets into similar functions for the cost -of -service analysis. The approach included summarizing the original cost of existing sewer system assets by function as well as projected CIP by function added through improvements to a FY 2022 test -year. Page G-15 summarizes existing assets by function and the projected cumulative system improvements by functional designation. The total of the existing system assets and projected CIP as of the FY 2022 test -year is included by functional area on page G- 4. Adjustments to cost of service include a variety of miscellaneous operating revenues and expenditures and capital expenditures (including cash inflows and outflows) as summarized on page G-6. Page G-9 shows the results of the allocation of revenue requirements to cost components. The cost -of -service process consists of two main steps. The first step allocates revenue requirements to the functional cost components. The second step allocates the functional costs among service characteristics. For example, collection system expense is allocated to volume and customer costs (based on the proportion of interceptors and location of collection lines) because a portion of the local collection lines provide available capacity to customers regardless of wastewater flows. Interceptors, or the system lines that are 10 inches or greater, which convey wastewater effluent to the wastewater treatment plant are allocated based on the volume of wastewater flows. There are two basic wastewater flow -based components: volume and customer. Volume costs vary with the quantity of wastewater contributed. Customer costs vary in proportion to the number of customer equivalents and monthly bills. Administration and general expenses are identified with system facilities or activities to the extent possible to simplify the allocation process. Those expenses that are not specifically assigned are allocated in proportion to all other operating expenses. Once operating and capital facilities are organized by function, the functional costs are allocated among service demand categories based on the service provided. This process is summarized in Appendix G-5 through G-9. UINIIT COST OF SIERVIICIE Unit cost of service forms the basis for class cost of service and is equal to the net cost of service divided by the applicable units of service in a customer class. The unit cost of service, or unit cost, is based on the proportional demands of all customers. Lines 26 and 27 of page G-9 summarize the FY 2022 test -year units of service and unit costs of service, respectively. Class cost of service is the product of unit cost and class units detailed on pages G-10 and G-11. Table 6-2 summarizes the cost of service for each customer classification compared to the projected FY 2022 revenues generated at current rates. Overall, the system revenue increases required by FY 2022 total 5.0%. The differences between the cost of service and revenue generated from the current rates provides the indicated adjustments to user charges necessary to achieve cost of service results by FY 2022. 111"" Ill u lll w 6-2: III'y 2022 Oath of caul-aliiae 11111 Op l to I ll evenu e uIJVuI°m r Ill ialu a Ca raer Ciao Residential Multi -Family Commercial 3 Creek Full Service Wholesale Septage Haulers Total Xi 2 Test -Year CostofService $567,788 163,330 1,234,087 64,287 254,767 156,100 87.516 2,527,875 2f 2 > eveillie at 'E $528,524 152,930 1,098,407 91,121 270,936 144,180 112.744 2,398,572 indicated °venue increaSe 7% 7% 12% (29%) (6%) 8% (22%) 5% Residential, Multi -Family Residential, Commercial, and Wholesale Contract customers are paying under their class cost -of -service for the evaluated FY 2022 test -year. Conversely, 3 Creek4, Full Service contract, and Septage Hauler customers are paying over their class cost -of -service for the evaluated FY 2022 test -year. e's l :f'1. Raftelis and Town staff reviewed various rate design alternatives that achieve the required revenue requirement for the sewer utility. The recommended rates achieve system -wide cost of service rates in FY 2022. Appendix H includes more detailed information related to the recommended rates. Excludes Capital Replacement Fee. ¢(.d ~ 11 '4 (114"' ,.0 ; II" : II,M . '^IP" IIVI II * 0:R 11111111 11,-11 11111111 1`,d S IIV 11111 WP, II ' 11111111 F? IN 11111 I1111111W 11111111 11,i. 111 II ' 11111111 ,fik IINII Ili, 1AII ^" 4; , II II 11 1,,, 11111111 S"'11"' 9Uu .. 1 . I XIISTIIIN RATI S The existing sewer rate structure includes a monthly service charge that increases by meter size. The Town's rate classes include: Residential Multi -Family Commercial Class I - Class VI 3 Creek Full Services Wholesale Contract6 All customers are assessed a volume rate per kgal based on water use during the AWC period. The Town's existing rates vary amongst residential, multi -family, and commercial customer classes. Town rates were last adjusted July 1, 2015. ,.2 AID IPTIEIDIFY 2022 IE ER RATES Raftelis worked with Town staff to evaluate rate structure alternatives which recover the cost of providing sewer services from customers. The recommended rates consist of system -wide cost -of -service monthly service charges increasing by meter size with the same volume rate per kgal for all customers in FY 2022. Raftelis worked with Town staff to develop two sewer rate alternatives based on the existing rate structure. The Town bills water customers monthly. The current rate structure includes a monthly base charge increasing by meter size and a system -wide volume rate per 1,000 gallons of AWC7 for residential customers and metered water use for all other customers. The Town maintains a separate rate schedule for 3 Creek that is typically updated annually. All sewer customers outside of 3 Creek pay the same base charges and volume rates today as inside Town. The following recommendations are integrated within one or more alternatives: Incorporate a minimum volume allowance for all customers to provide more guaranteed revenue stream for low volume uses and when accounts are otherwise using little or no water. 3 Creek customers to have the same rate structure as in -Town Residential customers, but unit prices are set to recover the cost of service to serve 3 Creek customers as a stand-alone and separate customer classification. Begin to rebalance the way costs to serve specific customer classes are recovered to make sure everyone is paying their fair share but do this gradually to avoid rate shock in a single year. Update strength -based wastewater rates and assessment approaches to equitably recover the cost of higher strength discharges from excess -strength customers. s Melody Ranch, Rafter J, Teton School, and other. 6 Wilson, Airport, Gros Ventre, Saddle Butte, and Spring Creek. The average of monthly metered water use in January through March is the basis for residential customer sewer billings for the other month. Table 6-3 summarizes different aspects of the existing and alternative rates which include common and differing aspects. " ll bIllle23 asieweier. III"°ltste 2ilnjeeiliives eiluix �m.wul�°mul�lmnw�ul°"y rribu System -Wide Rates Increase Revenue Recovery Via Base Charge Minimum Use Included in Base Charge Class Cost of Service Recovery 3 Creek Customer Full Cost Recovery Cii� irreii fr;. Y N N N Y 1 Y Y N N Y Mdlo o)teds Y Y Y N Y Raftelis has developed two alternative rates which include varying base charge and/or volume rate structure elements. The two alternatives include: Alternative 1: o Base charge increasing by meter size without minimum use of 2,000 gallons o System -wide volume rate per 1,000 gallons o Updated surcharges for excess -strength customers o Increased septage hauler rate increased Alternative 2 (Adopted): o Base charge increasing by meter size with minimum use of 2,000 gallons o System -wide volume rate per 1,000 gallons o Updated surcharges for excess -strength customers o Increased septage hauler rate increase of 9% proposed Table 6-4 summarizes existing and proposed base rates by meter size. Table 6-5 summarizes FY 2022 volume rates effective July 1, 2021. Rates apply for all sewer customers except 3 Creek. ."'111-alI IIIe i 2 m°. elll ied 111"6"Y 21.22 Sewer III'';III sse III':b,w i s Met Size 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch III IIIe 6u.5: IIFte w tmm` sniem1 Tier 1 Tier 2 $ 7.00 9.80 17.11 25.20 52.76 81.24 153.23 N/A Ado o d $ 11.55 14.61 23.61 31.64 53.34 81.02 146.34 224.97 II " 20'22 I II ' eslllcim ntlliielll and Nmwmm" III'lesllldm 1stlii mlllVoIllurne III ' !'' ulee ter Allocation 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 Current $2.27 2.27 $ 0.00 2.27 CIII 0 II di II * II " II'kii. Il b ll 1`,4 III WA "11" .A, IN II"'s III II ' II"?.. II"' II 'Ii IIMII II; III:All^"A 4; , II II II"' 9 Monitored customers are proposed to be assessed the "domestic" rate per kgal plus a surcharge per pound of BOD, TSS, and/or TKN above "domestic" strengths consistent with current rates and surcharges. Excess strength surcharges as calculated to be assessed for the monitored strengths above "domestic" levels by class as detailed in Table 6-6. Raftelis recommends that the Town consider implementing increased BOD and TSS surcharges in FY 2023 delayed due to the large potential impacts to individual customers. °11C°°u 111 I II 2 2 V III ° I II i °l IF"IFY 2022 C,111,25„,„: 2 tl111dIIro ugh O111t ^ 6 unne:111"b.ates t i ion Class II Class III Class IV Class V Class VI Flo $1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 $0.87 1.53 2.19 2.84 3.50 TSS $1.08 2.00 2.92 3.84 4.76 Total $3.27 4.85 6.43 8.00 9.58 The recommendation reflects the BOD and TSS classification summarized in Section 3 and strengths by customer type detailed in Table 6-7. While Raftelis evaluated TKN within the sewer cost of service analysis, all customers are anticipated to have the same "domestic" strength discharge of TKN and absent a higher than domestic strength for a particular customer, a TKN specific rate element was not proposed as part of this study. The Town should continue to track TKN and consider potential modifications to TKN surcharges or rate components as part of a future rate evaluation and as circumstances warrant. III Ilh a li �" III 11S00: a ri 1/111,2.1114 by u„A i oo, ur 'Type Residential / Class I Class II Class III Class IV Class V Class VI 225 400 700 1,000 1,300 1,600 150 350 650 950 1,250 1,550 TRN 48 48 48 48 48 48 Figure 6-1 summarizes monthly residential bills for four customer profiles with a 3/4 -inch meter size and billed wastewater volumes of 2,000 to 20,000 gallons under the current and adopted FY 2022 rates. $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 II:IIII Iii g 1.0 re 6..'"1 Illy ~h III u1°'u1 Iu III a ie r III $12 $18 $30 out Cu s $12 (m u1° Illhllll I ii III III u1'11Ill pact $18 $30 Cur Adopted 2kgall u5kgal 10 kgal 20 kgal $52 Figure 6-2 summarizes monthly customer bills for six customer profiles with 1 -inch water meter and billed wastewater volumes of 10,000 gals. to 100,000 gallons. $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 50 3 III: :it„ u1r w 6 2 IM onthIlly "1 dll ul°u1 III 1 '' ��:��� 111• Meter i;ush°I: rlmer Sower III3 III III III ul.n pact, $44 $123 $101 Cur $237 $237 $33 10 kgal tH 15 kgal OE 20 kgal • 40 kgal 111 . 2 0 21 II 111 11 111 $101 55 124 Adopted 50 kgal soli 100 kgal Raftelis worked with Town staff to evaluate the rate structure alternatives and recommend adopting 3 Creek customer rates which mirror the adopted Town rates while recovering the cost -of -service of providing contract retail services to 3 Creek customers. The rates reflect the cost -of -service to provide 3 Creek water and sewer services. 3 Creek customers are sited on large lots and many exert more significant peak usage ratios than Town Residential customers on a per account basis. ) II"M fiD II''"' , II 11" S 4, IAN , V 11A II w 11"" 11"iii II II 11'ii 11'V 1E A 11" 11""" II '" IIOR II") S II " II II il. 11"? 11"' II""i d IIMII II", C: A II""' A (" II II 11""' II" III''. "II"' 9 II: "'1 Raftelis reviewed the 3 Creek Water and Sewer Capital Replacement Charge detailed in Table 6-8. Raftelis and Town Staff, and 3 Creek representatives met to review preliminary 3 Creek base and volume rates. Following the meeting, the Town and 3 Creek agreed to remove some of the pipelines for purposes of calculating the Capital Replacement Charge as other customers are receiving sewer services. This amount is the "adjustment" reference in Table 6-7. The Town has updated the Capital Replacement Charge annually since 2007. The charge is calculated as the annual replacement value per 3 Creek lot and is assessed in addition to the 3 Creek base charge. -Ira lb IIIEm 6-6: 3 CI; iomm oulk III ° 2i 22 CaopOlt I II III"Roe lopIII acop? collo entC hart; rt; oo 2co a III uuIII utlii() e. cr oil 3 Creek Infrastructure ENR-CCI Ratio 2020/2007 Replacement Cost Adjustment Subtotal Use Full Life - Years a $1.84 M 1.43 2.63 M (0.81 M) $1.82 M Sew $1.80 M 1.43 1.69 M (0.88 M) $1.69 M 60 60 Annual Replacement Cost $30,273 $28,117 Lots at Build -Out 142 142 To all $3.64 M 1.43 5.20 M (1.70 M) $3.50 M Capital Replacement Fee $17.77 $16.50 $34.27 Current $24.56 $24.01 $48.57 Change - $ ($6.79) ($7.51) ($14.30) Change - % (38%) (46%) (42%) The adopted 3 Creek rates maintain the existing monthly base rates increasing by meter size. 3 Creek customers are assessed an additional Capital Replacement Charge for 3 Creek only infrastructure and this additional charge is proposed to be decreased. The adopted rates include different volumetric rate by customer classes for Residential, Commercial, and Irrigation -Only which more fairly recover additional costs from customers with larger outdoor water use. Tables 6-9, 6-10, 6-11, and 6-12 present the current water rates compared to the recommended adopted rates which are proposed to go into effect July 1, 2021. Separate Commercial and Irrigation -Only customer volume rates reflect a minimum allowance of 2,000 gallons per account and varying uniform volume rates for use over 2,000 gallons. Commercial includes Multi - Family Residential and all Non -Residential customer classes (e.g., Commercial, School, and Government). Appendix H contains additional detail related to the recommended 3 Creek rates. IIIeIIIe 6-9: Adel opt ed IIC '°Y 2022 3 Ourerulll er;,;Size 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch ,'runt Base $ 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 118.97 Cturrent au. Rea, $24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 24.56 Cxilld`rn nt $ 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 143.53 ui d Callf liilelll I II rrlpIlllecedoirn eui 1 Clllreur $ 13.56 20.16 35.18 53.76 106.50 163.52 320.09 Allotted $17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 17.77 Adtptd, $31.33 37.93 52.95 71.53 124.27 181.29 337.86 elIbIllle d1 °10 Ado opted 111"""'"Y 21;22 IIIrleeuidrrntlllelll 3 (3reelllr elll lli.uui teor III"Rotes Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 A11oc t ii 0 - 2,000 2,001 - 6,000 6,001- 25,000 Over 25,000 Current $ 0.00 2.02 4.04 6.06 � ellle er^ 6-11 r1epIII'rtet1 III......dr 2022 Ceuiedieul,°aliie ,1' ' nee lll wlwruMe iNater Rates eri)t1Ion„ Tier 1 Tier 2 Water Allocation 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $1.11 1.11 $ 0.00 2.02 e "" '": elllr.uui e Water Rates �:r e Adopted X332 ure�e� oral°°ui leluir'":�ui~r ui�l 2 enCri oaten Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 water' Allocation', 0 - 2,000 2,001- 25,000 Over 25,000 $2.12 2.12 2.12 $ 0.00 4.04 6.06 Table 6-13 summarizes existing and adopted 3 Creek sewer base and Capital Replacement Charges by meter size. Table 6-14 summarizes the FY 2022 3 Creek sewer volume rates effective July 1, 2021, which are the same as other volume rates. C)IN INN C) II II: "WY C, 0Ili II * II " III:, , 11-11 11:, , 1`,4 S II ' II II"' II'.iii. II"C 11:, , 11;111 II'?. II" II'li ii JIeN II M1, ' A III,, 1, , II II k ",!5',"11" 9 II: "'1 Tier 1 Tier 2 00"?)10)10e 6 13 AmOopt e2 IIC°° °°°u " 2022 2 Creelk to, orBase an 0o101)Iiit„ III IIC° e100)1IIaceui"m"meui t 7100°meu bee 3/4 -inch and less 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch u `rent ase $ 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 70.71 N/A Curren C a ti '+ 6t,, $24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 24.01 N/A Current 'ttatU';,, $ 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 94.72 N/A Adopted $ 17.75 22.45 36.28 48.62 81.97 124.51 224.89 345.73 $16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 16.50 Adotd„ Total $34.25 3 8.9 5 52.78 65.12 98.47 141.01 241.39 362.23 ltoelble 6 t Adopted IIC"IrY 2022 0 eui°°i c ur tmm rcIIllelll 0 ui eelll Sewer elllm,muinte III , m tee ter Allocation 0 - 2,000 Over 2,000 $1.88 $ 0.00 1.88 2.27 Raftelis completed a survey of comparable resort utilities to compare to the Town's current and adopted monthly bills using 5,000 gallons per month for water and billed wastewater. Figure 7-1 shows a typical monthly under the current and adopted July 1, 2021, rates compared to the survey group. Figure 7-2 shows the monthly bill for a commercial customer with a 1 -inch water meter using 12,000 gallons per month water and 5,000 gallons per month billed wastewater under the current rates and adopted July 1, 2021, rates compared to the survey group. $14() $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 $220 $200 $3.80 $:0.60 $140 $.120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 $36 $51 318 000000000000 000000000000 0333 3 .E ul e "'i"u111 II'hes IIIdent111a I II 1Mo Iln wll h Illy Water Levey $105 $33 $82 587 $31 $14 0303000300330 $8.3 VW \A/titer IN Wastewater 568 $53 $125 111"3111g uLm lire . C ul e urn ure lii a 111 1 Iii ul.m e llli Mete:- ie:- III (“„, ralh Illy 'Water r Illl kl lii 1 11 111 Survey $50 5139 11111101110111111 111 5111 5122 1111 11111 11111 11111 11111 111 11 111 545 5109 Water ■ Wastewater $'72 $59 6 $196 $70 $92 "11" 3s II3M u0:3 111""' 33400303 03,",;,,',13,3333 1'33 , V2 '11" II " II"ii 11-11 11 3 11",,ii S1132.1133 WAII"' II"hi ll'"" II3R II'3 ,'iI 1133 1133 1133 113'13A 3113 113 , ,,, IIMII II"D 43',',3133,1133433011 "3"'''00" 1I I II' "II"' 9J 11) 31 P a l ty The primary funding sources used by water utilities to pay for required CIP expenditures are operating revenues from water rates and capacity fee receipts. In growing communities such as the Town, capacity fee receipts can provide a significant portion of required CIP funding and/or debt repayment of external debt financing providing upfront funding. As a result, the determination of capacity fees and the projection of the future capacity fee receipts is a critical part of the financial planning process discussed in Section 4 of this Report. Capacity fees are also referred to as system development charges, plant investment fees, capacity fees, tap fees, and a variety of other terms. As described in the AWWA M1, these fees compensate a community for the cost of acquiring, constructing, and extending infrastructure to support new development: "A system development charge (SDC) is a one-time charge paid by a new water system customer for system capacity. It is also assessed to existing customers requiring increased system capacity. The receipts from this charge are used to finance the development of capacity -related water facilities and are an important funding/financing source for growth -related or capacity -related water facilities." There are several legal standards that define the design and application of capacity fees. For example, capacity fees cannot pay for O&M expenses but may fund capital and repay debt service obligations. There must also be a rational nexus between the capacity fees paid by new development and the costs such fees are used to pay for. This means that capacity fee receipts are dedicated for infrastructure expansion required by new development. In addition, capacity fees must be proportional to a new development's share of growth - related infrastructure costs. tit O. The three primary industry accepted methodologies for calculating water capacity fees are the Equity Buy - In, Incremental Cost, and Hybrid or Combined approaches. Depending on the unique circumstances of the utility in question, the use of one or more of these approaches results in a conceptually defensible and fundamentally equitable method for recovering the cost of system capacity additions required to serve new development. Not only can different methods be used between utilities of the same entity, but different methods can be used within the same utility. For example, in the case of the Town, depending on the circumstances it would be appropriate to use different methods for the water infrastructure versus sewer infrastructure. I I ®III I TIH IDOL Y The buy -in method is typically used by utility systems with existing available capacity to meet the long-term demands imposed by new development. This method estimates the value of a unit of system capacity based upon customer equity in existing capacity -related assets. Thus, the resulting capacity fee reflects the proportional cost of new customer's share of existing system capacity. Under the buy -in method, the cost of existing capacity -related facilities is generally estimated using based on current replacement cost. However, some utilities, depending on their unique circumstances, choose to value existing capacity -related assets at original cost, net book value, or replacement cost less depreciation. II I I I IM IN'T IL C°i ST I 'IHISDSIL Y The incremental cost method focuses on the cost of the additional capacity -related assets required to serve new customers. The incremental cost method is most appropriate for utility systems that do not have existing available capacity to serve growth. The resulting capacity fee reflects the proportional cost of each new customer's share of future system capacity. As such, the incremental cost method is most appropriately used when a utility has a well-defined capital improvement program or utility master plan. .3.1HYI I III I" °` I ' I D IL Y In addition to the equity buy -in and incremental cost methods, it is also common for many water utilities to use a combination of these two approaches. This combined "hybrid" approach is often used when a utility has some existing system capacity to accommodate growth but will also be required to construct additional new capacity in the future. For example, assume that a water utility has adequate treatment capacity to accommodate long-term demand growth but that it has a shortage of backbone transmission main and pumping capacity. In such a situation, it may be appropriate to utilize the equity buy -in method to calculate that portion of the capacity fees associated with existing facilities and the incremental cost method to calculate that portion of the capacity fees related to planned capacity additions. $. 4 'TIEIPS Ill THE T I C IP CITY FEE AL UIL 1111 IN I CIE Calculating a capacity fee requires a multi -step process which begins with the valuation of capacity -related facilities. The second step in the capacity fee calculation process is to determine the appropriate units of capacity to use in the calculation. In many cases, the fundamental unit of capacity is defined as single family residential maximum day or annual average day water demand. This is the approach used by Raftelis to calculate the Town's capacity fees. The third step in the capacity fee calculation process is to determine the unit cost of capacity. This is achieved by dividing capacity -related costs by the appropriate units of capacity. Finally, an assessment schedule is developed to reflect the demand relationships between various types of customers, land uses and meter sizes. Table 8-1 summarizes these steps for each capacity fee calculation methodology. "II" w":) II M ()IF, „II A il ,; 11" '3 C:) 11', 1 .,, 'It P. ° IIWdI II * 0:i. II'Iiii 11-11 11',,,,E NI III''ti II A III"' II'I,,E I " II , fl II") .'I's II II 11 ' '. 11"'? 11 " II"'Ii i 11 11 II All ^" A.','',; II II I I 11',,,, IIi " II"' 9I II: ''Ili''' °°l°' I ll Mlle g, Stelp Iii ui tlhe Water St #1: Asset Valuation #2: Units of Capacity #3: Unit Cost of Capacity #4: Assessment Schedule lei ):���� Btu in Estimate value of existing assets Determine units of existing capacity Calculate unit cost of existing capacity f cii y fee C IIIcuuuIll: tii0III II lent Estimate value of future growth -related asset additions Estimate future capacity unit additions Calculate unit cost of incremental capacity additions 111 b rid Estimate value of existing assets and future growth -related asset additions Determine existing units of capacity and future capacity unit additions Calculate unit cost of combined existing and future capacity additions Determine the capacity fee assessment schedule VIII 1.1 tit)! oo Raftelis calculated the unit cost of water infrastructure and resources for recovery from the water capacity fee using all three industry standard calculation methodologies. Our recommendation is that the Town base the water infrastructure component of the capacity fee on the hybrid methodology and the sewer fee using the buy -in methodology. The Town has anticipated expansionary water capital improvements of $3.95 million over the Study Period in addition to available capacity within existing water infrastructure. Conversely, the wastewater utility has sufficient capacity to serve anticipated development over the Study Period with existing infrastructure. The approaches result in the maximum supportable contribution to reimburse current customers for the cost of capacity -related infrastructure. Our recommendations are also consistent with input collected from the Town of Jackson's CRC. To summarize guidance provided by this group of stakeholders representing a diverse set of community perspectives, capacity fees should: Adequately recover costs that development places on the utility systems Account for redevelopment of properties where square footage (and thus impact) increases while meter size remains the same Not disincentivize the development of affordable housing The Buy -In value of the existing wastewater system represents the replacement cost new (RCN) of the water system components. This RCN is determined by escalating original facility asset values based on the Engineering New Record - Construction Cost Index (ENR-CCI). The value of minor assets, miscellaneous improvements and older assets that are reserved were contributed by developers, or were contributed by other parties, are excluded from the Buy -In value of facilities available to serve new ERUs. By including the RCN of the water facilities available to serve new ERUs, the City can use water capacity fee revenues to pay annual payments on, or retire debt issued to fund the existing portion water facilities. Town and Nelson Engineering Staff developed the multi -year CIP and prioritized capital improvements. The growth -related water facilities include 50% of Well 9 and the Zone 3 Water Storage Tank. Figure 8-1 shows annual improvements by year over the Study Period. 0 Ain v II Igt„Er 8-11: 111"""Y 2028 through III"'y 202w'' iBIII°u wtlll ancIV III $ $4 $3 $2 $1 so a 00000000000005 SO Ih III'° eIllate i ei uul'° 1 11 11 1' ° 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2 2,5 2126 212°7 2128 2029 • Growth related ono Non-growth-relate�:n p. city Raftelis calculated maximum supportable water capacity fees per ERU. Table 8-2 summarizes the maximum supportable water capacity fee of $2,793 per ERU. The current water capacity fee, at $690 for new connections with a 3A -inch water meter. The existing water capacity fee has not been substantially updated in many years and does not reflect the impact new users place on the water system. p II " II " II'Iiii. S II Wd6IkII"' II'kii. II " I108 113 1113 dI'wM IIMII 11111, III' A A ‘,111`,1 II '113S IIIIIII1 SITU 113 '1 a III Ole g 2 III ax Iii ui°rm u g Supp III lolb III ter Copa ty III: : e Colllleulnallla aii ui Water System RCN (1) Distribution System RCN (1) (2) Growth -Related Capital FY 2020 - FY 2029 Net Present Value of Future Interest Total for Capacity Fee Calculation Total for Capacity Fee Calculation Treatment Capacity - MGD Unit Cost of Capacity - $ / gal. Unit Cost of Capacity - $ / gal. Peak Day Design Capacity - gal / ERU Capacity Fee per ERU Calculation $95.23 M (31.71M) 3.95 M 1.93 M $69.41 M $69.41 M 15.26 M $4.52 $ 4.52 X 617 $2,793 (1) Per Nelson Engineering estimates provided in May 2020. (2) Excludes 8 -inch and smaller distribution system pipelines. (3) FY 2019 Water Use per ERU. Raftelis developed two alternative water capacity assessment alternatives as follows: Alternative 1 o Maintains meter size -based fees for all customers and adjusts the fees to the maximum supportable fee of $2,793 for a 3A -inch customer. o Fees increase by meter size using proposed capacity ratios by meter size per AWWA M18. Alternative 2 (adopted) o Establishes a separate assessment schedule for residential (including multi -family) and all other customer types. o Residential assessment includes: o Fee based on the number of bedrooms through 3 bedrooms and an incremental fee per bedroom for each additional bedroom o Fee based on the Land Development Regulation (LDR) Landscape Ratio (LSR), representing the cost per square foot of landscaped square feet. Non-residential and irrigation -only customer assessment of fees by meter size as summarized in Table 8-3 Table 8-3 summarizes the existing water capacity fee compared to the alternative 1 capacity fee assessment schedule - both by meter size. The same capacity fees are proposed for non-residential developments under Alternative 2. 8 Flow in gallons per minute is based on meter capacity standards published in the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Manual M1, Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges, 7th Edition. � :.w . I II tm 8-3: 1'"� III���eul°mi ul�mU pt, y III':...:°°"u� 21':1 Ill�i ul,m III'° sul ' ntVI Ind uI^uI,°uI� ilii��ul-m ul� y ier C III m eliify 111':...:e ll y Meter to r liter 3/4 -inch 1 -inch 1 1/2 -inch 2 -inch 3 -inch 4 -inch 6 -inch 8 -inch Curren $690 1,227 2,761 4,909 11,044 19,633 44,176 N/A iAdo„® $2,793 4,664 9,301 14,887 29,801 46,559 93,091 148,951 For residential and multi -family customers, the adopted assessment is intended to correct an apparent disparity within the current meter sized based fee assessment. The adopted assessment approach will: Enable the Town to fully recover costs development places on the water system Provide more scalable fees and resulting impacts to the range of bedroom (and related housing sizes) resulting from new development and redevelopment. Separating indoor and outdoor water use requirements will also enable the Town to assess capacity fees separately for the two main drivers of residential water use (people and landscaping), but as separately assessed rather than combined within the requirements sizing the meter. In developing the modified capacity fee structure, Raftelis, Nelson Engineering and Town staff evaluated indoor water use for different bedrooms as the basis for the residential indoor fees by type and per bedroom. Irrigation -only water use reflects efficient irrigation systems and resulting water use per day in the peak period per irrigated square foot9. The indoor portion of the assessment schedules reflect peak water demands per bedroom. The outdoor portion of reflects peak irrigation season water use per square foot of landscaped area for all residential and irrigation -only customers. o Landscaped areas reflect the greater of the • Minimum LDR LSR requirements, or • Actual landscaped areas. Table 8-4 summarizes the Alternative 2 (adopted) residential water capacity fee assessment schedule. A 3 bedroom is assessed the same fee as 3/4 -inch meter and is considered one ERU. 9 Annual irrigation requirements developed using Guidelines for Estimating Unmetered Landscaping Water Use, Federal Energy Management Program, USDOE, July 2010. Peak period monthly irrigation use is assumed to be 20% of annual requirement. "II" :;bICVII M C). II''"' ,.II il ,; II" () II M . "1f" P. IIIIIIII IIIIIIII NI S II ''ti IIII III , WAII"' II'Iiii II IRA II " II ' Ii /N. IISII II IN d.. , II S '"111";,3 lb IIImm44 4m III tee III °' i Ilh5tm sliimla n taiia x urm4' I ll a ui 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Each Add' 1 Bedroom (1) Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. of Landscaped Area (2) Area 5r Ca p°maliiiy Fee xaaa,a ui,°ui"ma n t 140 210 280 70 / BR $4.52 4.52 4.52 4.52 Ad!atd'" $633 949 1,265 316 (1) GPD or gallon per day. Per Nelson Engineering staff including kitchen, bathroom, and laundry. (2) Assumes 10 gallons per year per sq. ft. of irrigable area with 25% in peak -month or 0.08 gallons per day applied to the $4.52 per gallon per day. 365 Raftelis worked with Town staff to update the Sewer Capacity Fee as well as evaluate the assessment schedule. Raftelis calculated maximum supportable Wastewater Capacity Fee per 3/4 -inch wastewater meter ERU. Table 8-5 summarizes the maximum supportable Wastewater Capacity Fee of $4,547 per ERU. The current Wastewater Capacity Fee is $2,172 per residential dwelling unit with 2 or more bedrooms. The existing sewer capacity fee has not been substantially updated in many years and does not reflect the impact new users place on the sewer system. "aeIII Ille d IMaxlllornuni Su a tmaiawxiair III::'xx a am.,m ailiit°mui Wastewater System RCN (1) Collection System RCN (1) (2) Total for Capacity Fee Calculation Total for Capacity Fee Calculation Treatment Capacity - MGD (1) Unit Cost of Capacity - $ / gal. $113.97 M (32.09M) $81.20 M $81.20 M 5.00 $16.24 Unit Cost of Capacity - $ / gal. $ 16.24 Peak Day Design Capacity - gal / ERU (3) X 280 Capacity Fee per ERU $4,547 (1) Per Nelson Engineering estimates provided in May 2020. (2) Excludes 8 -inch and smaller distribution system pipelines. (3) Indoor water use Per ERU or 3 -bedroom residential unit . Raftelis developed two alternative wastewater capacity fee assessment alternatives as follows: Alternative 1 o Maintains existing assessment categories and updates the anticipated gallon per day use in the peak day; applies the updated unit cost of $16.24 per gallon per day of wastewater facility capacity. o 2 bedroom and greater per dwelling unit updated o Apartment and 1 -bedroom unit fees with and without laundry per dwelling unit updated. Alternative 2 (adopted) o Establishes a separate assessment schedule for residential (including multi -family). o Residential assessment includes fee based on the number of bedrooms through 3 bedrooms and an incremental fee for each additional bedroom o Non-residential assessment of fees same as Alternative 1 Table 8-6 summarizes the existing wastewater capacity fees and assessment criteria by development type. The assumed gallon per day (GPD) by type reflects a review of assessment categories updating previously assumed water use and for many categories, the expected use per day has been modified. The previous assumptions have been in place for several years. As previously discussed, the differences between Alternatives 1 and 2 are entirely for residential and multi -family residential customers and are proposed to be solely based on the number of bedrooms regardless of the type of residential unit. In developing the adopted capacity fees, Raftelis, Nelson Engineering and Town staff evaluated indoor water use for different residential and non-residential land uses. Note that there are additional categories proposed where an existing category does not exist. II" .) YVII M C.) II''"' J A 11',7, 0 IIVI II * II " II'kii. II b II"k. ISM S WA "11" II'kii. II? A Ihfl II;) 11"?" II " A II ^" "11""'f. t�III III d d Ill led III: :°°'9i Ind uiAuururent. Wastewater Capaelii't'y III: : ea Assess: : ::„,i"m ° Schedulll Apartment, Studio or 1 BR Residential Unit (2BR) Residential Unit (3BR) Residential Unit Each Additional BR Unfinished Habitable Space Bars, Tavern and Lounge (no food) Restaurants (full service) Restaurants (paper service only — no dishes) Restaurants (single service) Caterers Motels and Hotels Bed and Breakfast Assembly (no food) Assembly (w/ food) RV Parks (w ind. Sewer hookups) Camps, Parks, Campgrounds (w/ comfort station) Mobile Home Park Laundry (self service) Laundry (commercial 100#pp capacity) Breweries (per annual production 1 barrel is 31 gals. Fitness (Gyms, Dance Studies, Yoga, Karate) Medical Offices and Dentists Veterinary Offices (not including boarding) Animal Boarding Offices Retail Stores Unfinished Commercial Space Public Access Restrooms Service Stations Car Washes Public Spas, Pools or Hot Tubs (Per kgal capacity) Schools (w/ Cafeteria, Gym, and Showers) Schools (w/ Cafeteria, No Gym) Schools (without Cafeteria and Gym) Day Care and Pre School 140 210 280 70 70 20 64 50 30 80 140 140 3 5 100 75 210 450 1,000 20 50 250 250 20 15 5 5 325 220 1,000 10 20 15 10 20 Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Per Add' 1 BR Per 400 sq. ft. Per 15 sq. ft. Per Seat (1) Per 100 sq. ft. Per Seat (1) Per 100 sq. ft. Per Room Per Room Per 5 sq. ft. Net Per 15 sq. ft. Net Per Site Per Site Per Site Per Machine Min. /Machine Per Gal. Ann. Capacity Per 100 sq. ft. Per Practitioner Per Practitioner Per Cage Per Employee Per 1,000 sq. ft. Per 1,000 sq. ft. Per Fixture Per Pump Per Bay Per 50 sq. ft. Gross Per Student Per Student Per Student Per Student Others Not Listed Wastewater Service Avg. Max GPD x $16.24 (1) 15 square feet per seat net anticipated for full service or single service restaurants. $1,088 2,172 2,172 N/A N/A 297 399 N/A N/A N/A 985 1,116 24 36 493 369 2,174 1,486 5,435 ICB N/A 614 N/A N/A 147 24 N/A 1,088 4,927 N/A 98 N/A N/A 98 $2,274 3,410 4,547 316 N/A 325 1,039 812 487 1,299 2,274 2,274 49 81 1,624 1,218 3,410 7,308 16,240 325 812 4,060 4,060 325 244 81 81 5,278 3,573 16,240 162 325 244 162 325 „It). X11 . !.., . is 1'1'1y1 1"" 11,.'1.'1111;11. Raftelis completed a variety of capacity fee impacts comparing the adopted to the current fees. Tables 8-7 and 8-8 summarize residential water and wastewater capacity fees under current and adopted fees by customer profile. Residential customer profiles include: Home A: 3 -bedroom, 7,500 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 3/4 -inch water meter. Home B: 4 -bedroom, 12,500 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 1 -inch water meter. Home C: 5 -bedroom, 15,000 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 1 -inch water meter. Home D: 2 -bedroom, 5,000 sq. ft. lot, 60% LSR, and 3/4 -inch water meter. 1 I II III e d eeul °m I II III III1eeliidsoon IIIeIII Home A Home B Home C Home D Curre uI IOSepac, u11y III° e e Ill y CieeleInte Pr e°Ilflii lll indoor Outdoor Ado $ 690 $1,266 $1,640 $2,906 1,227 1,582 2,734 4,316 1,227 1,898 3,281 5,179 690 949 1,094 2,043 -111-8 lb III e d y IIII C.eelu ' III IIIe 108.esliide nt aIIl leVa er CeIIIpa 'Olooy III':IIIIeee Ilh y C eleulsieul IIIProfliillle Home A Home B Home C Home D ciar $ 2,172 2,172 2,172 2,172 $4,547 4,547 4,547 4,547 Tables 8-9 and 8-10 summarize Multi -Family Residential water and wastewater capacity fees under current and adopted fees by customer profile. Multi -Family Residential development profiles include: MF A: 7, 1 -bedroom unit, 2,000 sq. ft. irrigable, and 1 -inch water meter. MF B:13, 1 -bedroom units, 5,000 sq. ft. irrigable, and 1 1/z -inch water meter. 1elll lll IIOO.saonoolopIlle I11 .490uicieniuielll 1Nater Csopec;Olty III'Ises by I ll or III ultul°IiiIIIe MFA MF B $ 1,227 $4,430 $730 $5,160 2,761 8,229 1,825 10,054 Ill ellh lll � 8-10: IlOIest ntlll llle IllZm sliid ,nt.uielll lodfasteveatt3or ye o Fees Ill y i8uet. nmeui III ui �fiii llle� MFA MF B $7,616 $21,160 14,144 45,940 (,) II M ':I II''"' ,IIA (. II1',...9 114 . ID 0 NI NISIII'VOE, P II'II'EIII"? A IINII) 9 "v II II ' l. I'?..,I II " II"'k. ,. IIMII II" „,, P 14 II I 1 9JI II: 't Tables 8-11 and 8-12 summarize Office and Retail customer water and wastewater capacity fees under current and adopted fees by customer profile. The following profiles were used for commercial connections: >» Office space: 50 employees and 1 -inch water meter. Retail store: 10,000 sq. ft indoor and 1 -inch water meter. 2 :m Ilh �� 1'� °l Illl �� .�mui�� 114"`µ �. °If°lliiee ui y III"°°' e'i'e Iii � 2 m.µ s'� ui"mme uimm 114 ' ui�m aIII' l ii e Water Ca ... ,,,��� Office Retail WooIII IIImm 8-12: 111:011ll.x.a. 0't"l'Iiie;e uima:i III' imm' 'a liilll Office Retail Vntr $1,227 Ado G $4,664 1,227 4,664 cu ate or Cap, en Adorwi, 'I $7,350 $12,200 1,470 2,440 y Cue'' 114 u m'�'liilllmm Tables 8-13 and 8-14 summarize Restaurant customer water and wastewater capacity fees under current and adopted fees by customer profile. The following profiles were used for restaurant connections: Restaurant A: 2,000 sq. ft indoor and 1 -inch water meter. Restaurant B: 4,000 sq. ft indoor and 1 1/2 -inch water meter. ""'xlllmllle 2 12 111 'a xuiemll4 Ille Alloests rant INonteo Ca aelii'iy III m ee Ill y CL.mxim:muiemeu° 1111ui x'lll"liillDe 11 e111 II11e 1 . 1119iiiils a solo 111 'Illsµ III ' ' es Office Retail 11 m Ira 101 " Office Retail Fran $1,227 ted $4,664 2,761 9,301 a'teiu- Ca1'aeii'i'y 11Fees lII y i" m,1'e'i'm"µul Adoo„ $53,200 $138,533 106,400 277,067 µs III ui Tables 8-15 and 8-16 summarize Lodging customer water and wastewater capacity fees under current and adopted fees by customer profile. The following profiles were used for lodging connections: Lodging A: 15 rooms and 1 1 -inch water meter. Excludes separately calculated components of water and sewer capacity fees associated with laundry, pools, spas and/or restaurants. Lodging B: 30 rooms and 2 -inch water meter. Excludes separately calculated components of water and sewer capacity fees associated with laundry, pools, spas and/or restaurants. °°'lli Ilh Illo 8-1 5 lEtroraui I II III rm I II ° d iii uI°my fu uI °°„ ,w y' m Ill iily 111"tecoos Illy 1bui r IIIbur flii Office Retail tra lb III bo flell fwl DOE III III Illl....m'w motor ii ul Office Retail Ciar $2,761 Ade 4 $9,301 4,909 14,887 o,000r ff III l ii fy °I'° 114 y Cush:tater 1115rofIlle curr Ado ed $14,775 $31,110 29,550 68,220 Table 8-17 summarizes Irrigation -Only customer water and wastewater capacity fee under current and adopted fees for a single customer profile. Fee comparison reflects an Irrigation -Only connection assuming 20,000 sq. ft. irrigable area and a 1 1/2 -inch water meter. I 114 111 y '1 'f I II t iii ul p lIllu III oo iii ull tool ui i ' m y iuI°m yWater aIll ,tot ify y Cu 1 n°mtour "tr 111"1011le Home A e urr $2,761 $9,301 "I" ()IN A I; II :b IIoM "Y. P. 110 II * II"? IIIIIIII NI S II'' IIIIIII WA II' IIIIIIII ID A IN D 11"IDAT IIIIIIII A IMOD II ^° AID II II I Figure 9-1 shows the results of a survey Raftelis completed of comparable ski resort to compare to the Town's current and adopted water and wastewater capacity fees of "House A". House A includes 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2,000 sq. ft. home, and a 4,500 sq. ft. irrigable area as part of a 7,500 sq. ft. lot. Figure 9-2 shows the results of the same survey group comparing water capacity fees to "House B". House B includes 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 3,000 sq. ft. home, and a 7,500 sq. ft. irrigable area as part of a 12,500 sq. ft. lot. I iig a r v, IIFFf os I ii ie ntIiiaIII pacify Iiit; 114 " eo Survey 1111.1 iii.,u! : cou $50,0 $40,000 $'30,4100 $20,000 $10,000 $o $50,000 $ 000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $o �q� > tia Or �� c e 11111111111111111111 ter • Wastewater 14 " Iii 9. 114• 7 µy IIL..� n iii.0 tug u'TM IllE 3 uvu�°v 9 IIC:��v �iiivauTMu�.miliiu > �.�"1u vlii�° 114" "'vv Survey Water • Wastewater miiiolll mlim NNW IIg4 4:S 11""' 4 A4,3 11 ~P x )1114 „ WI'll" 4:, 4 IIA II II„ I Ilii', II II II II N '!ii: II 'V IIIIIII. W.A.mIlm Viii', III A IINI D IS II N4? IIIIIII. IIIIIIII. II'IIP, A mIlm Ilii'.. A. IION 0 'IS F^i. II'" A 4;, II II 1 1 1',:„. Illm 4.1110 ""IP Tow n of Jack son, WY FILE: JAWY W W ater and Sewer Fin ancial Pla n a nd R ate Study SCHEDULE: Wat er -CASH FLOW Water RANGE: Water_CASHFLOW1 Total Wat er Fu nd C ash Flow Line No. Description Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 1 Revenue Adjustment 0.0% 0 .0% 8.0% 8.0% 9 .0% 9.0% 8 .0% 8.0% 8 .0% 8.0% 2 Revenues 3 Wa ter Service Reve nues $2,373,445 $2,515,901 $2,746,998 $2,997,601 $3,301,212 $3,635,382 $3,965,990 $4,326,495 $4,719,298 $5,147,827 4 Capacity Fee Revenues 122,225 83,274 163,656 168,566 173,623 181,885 187,342 192,962 198,751 208,151 5 M isce llaneo us 113,516 60,920 61,984 63,067 64,171 65,295 66,440 67,606 68,794 70,004 6 Interest Income 95,585 131,674 129,943 149,118 133,342 222,810 124,300 139,057 131,262 103,936 7 Total Revenue s 2,704,771 2,791,769 3,102,581 3,378,353 3,672,348 4,105,373 4,344,072 4,726,120 5,118,105 5,529,918 8 .0% $2,746,998 163,656 61,984 129,943 8 To tal O pe ra ting Expenditures 1,992,228 2,085,757 2,183,780 2,286,516 2,394,196 2,507,060 2,625,362 2,749,368 2,879,356 3,015,618 3,102, 581 2,183,780 9 Ne t Revenue s Av aila ble for De bt Service 712,543 706,012 918,801 1,091,836 1,278,152 1,598,312 1,718,710 1,976,752 2,238,750 2,514,299 10 Debt Se rv ice 11 Existing Bond Debt Service 108,217 108,218 107,749 107,749 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 12 Proposed Bond Debt Service 0 0 42,913 85,825 226,045 366,264 497,438 628,612 628,612 628,612 918,801 107,749 42,913 0 150,661 13 To tal Debt Serv ice 108,217 108,218 150,661 193,574 293,015 433,234 564,408 695,582 695,582 695,582 14 Net Re ve nues A va ilable After De bt Se rvice 15 Cash or Grant Funded CIP 16 Debt Funde d CIP 17 To tal Capital Expe nditure s 18 Capital Funding 19 Ne t Bond Proceeds (1) 20 Grants 21 Total Capital Funding Sources 604,326 597,794 768,140 898,262 116,600 0 667,038 0 712,116 664,470 985,137 1,165,078 818,333 1,335,787 710,983 564,990 1,176,112 3,929,373 1,154,302 1,281,170 564,036 4,204,429 4,768,466 1,592,950 1,592,950 0 1 ,543,168 1,818,717 2,636,211 0 2,719,803 0 768,140 712,116 664,470 116,600 667,038 1,376,586 1,529,316 1,900,777 5,105,485 2 ,636,211 2,719,803 0 0 1,375,453 0 4,494,363 0 4,204,429 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,375,453 0 4,494,363 0 4,204,429 0 0 0 1,376,586 1,375,453 0 1,375,453 22 Net Cash Flow 487,726 (69,244) 767,007 (631,053) 3,578,723 (3,940,407) 590,266 (311,780) (1,093,044) 23 Total Water Fund BOY Cash Balance 4,779,242 5,266,968 5,197,724 5,964,731 5,333,678 8,912,401 4,971,994 5,562,260 5,250,480 4,157,436 24 EOY Cash Balance 5,266,968 5,197,724 5,964,731 5,333,678 8,912,401 4,971,994 5,562,260 5,250,480 4,157,436 3,256,351 25 Unspent Bond Proceeds 0 0 710,983 0 3,929,373 0 0 0 0 0 26 Cash Rese rve s Ta rge t (2) 1,726,089 1,772,853 1,821,865 1,873,233 1,927,073 2,991,353 3,050,504 3,112,506 3,177,500 3,245,632 27 EOY Cash Balance - Unrestricte d 3,540,879 3,424,871 3,431,883 3,460,445 3,055,955 1,980,642 2,511,756 2,137,974 979,936 10,719 767,007 5,197, 724 5,964,731 710,983 1,821,865 3,431,883 28 Restricted Water Funds EOY Cash Balance (2) 29 EOY Cash Balance - Restricte d and Unrestricted 30 Cash Reserv e - Target (2) 31 DSC - Annual Debt Serv ice (3) 1,726,089 1,772,853 2,532,848 1,873,233 5,856,446 2,991,353 3,050,504 3,112,506 3,177,500 3,245,632 2,532,848 $5,266,968 $5,197,724 $5,964,731 $5,333,678 $8,912,401 $4,971,994 $5,562,260 $5,250,480 $4,157,436 $3,256,351 $5,964,731 $1,726,089 $1,772,853 $1,821,865 $1,873,233 $1,927,073 $2,991,353 $3,050,504 $3,112,506 $3,177,500 $3,245,632 6.58 6.52 6.10 5. 64 4.36 3.69 3.05 2 .84 3 .22 3.61 (1) Net bond proceeds are bond proceeds less issuance expenses and debt service reserves included in the gross bond proceeds. (2) Target is at least 50% of O&M (or 180 days) plus 5 -year average cash funded capital. Also in cludes unspent bond proceeds as debt is assum ed to be issued over a 2 -year period . (3) Ne t Re ve nue s Ava ilable fo r De bt Service ta rge ted to be at least 1. 30 time s a nnual de bt service is pro pose d fo r rate setting. $1,821,865 6.10 Page A - 1 Pe p r ,d by Faf,I,, 12/14/2021 Tow n of Jack son, WY FILE: JAWY W W ater Fi nan cial Pl an and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Wat er -CASH FLOW Water RANGE: Water_CASHFLOW2 Operating S ubfu nd Ca sh Flow Line No. Description Pr ojected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 1 Operating Revenues 2 Wa ter Service Revenues $2,373,445 $2,515,901 $2,746,998 $2,997,601 $3,301,212 $3,635,382 $3,965,990 $4,326,495 $4,719,298 $5,147,827 3 M iscellaneous 113,516 60,920 61,984 63,067 64,171 65,295 66,440 67,606 68,794 70,004 4 Interest 95,585 113,425 111,694 113,094 115,093 106,326 80,854 95,611 87,816 60,490 5 Total Operating Revenues 2,582,546 2,690,246 2,920,676 3,173,763 3,480,475 3,807,003 4,113,284 4,489,712 4,875,908 5,278,321 $2,746,998 61,984 111,694 6 Total O perating Expenditures 7 Net Revenues Available for Debt Service 1,992,228 2,085,757 2,183,780 2,286,516 2,394,196 2,507,060 2,625,362 2,749,368 2,879,356 3,015,618 2,920,676 2,183,780 590,318 604,489 736,895 887,246 1,086,279 1,299,943 1,487,922 1,740,344 1,996,553 2,262,703 8 Debt Serv ice 9 Existing Bond Debt Service 108,217 108,218 107,749 107,749 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 10 Pro posed Bond De bt Service 0 0 42,913 85,825 226,045 366,264 497,438 628,612 628,612 628,612 11 Total Debt Service 108,217 108,218 150,661 193,574 293,015 433,234 564,408 695,582 695,582 695,582 736,895 107,749 42,913 150,661 12 Net Reve nues Ava ilable After De bt Se rvice 482,101 496,271 586,234 693,672 793,264 866,709 923,514 1,044,762 1,300,971 1,567,121 13 Transfe r to Capital Improve me nt Subfund 724,350 565,515 530,210 613,743 1,143,914 1,885,590 333,249 1,356,542 2,394,015 2,468,207 14 Net Ca shflo w 15 Beginning of Year Cash Balance 16 End of Year Cash Balance 17 Cash Reserves Target (1) 18 End of Year Cash Balance- Unrestricted 586,234 530,210 (242,249) (69,244) 4,779,242 4,536,993 4,467,750 996,114 1,042,879 56,024 79,930 (350,650) (1,018,881) 4,536,993 4,467,750 4,523,773 4,603,703 4,253,053 4,253,053 3,234,172 1,197,098 1,253,530 590,266 (311,780) 3,234,172 3,824,438 3,824,438 3,512,658 1,312,681 1,374,684 (1,093 ,044) (901,085) 3,512,658 2,419,614 2 ,419,614 1,518,528 1,439,678 1,507,809 $979,936 $10,719 56,024 4,467,750 4,523,773 1,091,890 4,523,773 4,603,703 1,091,890 1,143,258 $3,540,879 $3,424,871 $3,431,883 $3,460,445 $3,055,955 $1,980,642 $2,511,756 $2,137,974 $3,431,883 19 Ca sh Re serve - Target 25% (1) 228% 214 % 207% 201% 178 % 129 % 146% 128% 84 % 50 % 20 Cash Reserve - Target at 25% (1) $996,114 $1,042,879 $1,091,890 $1,143,258 $1,197,098 $1,253,530 $1,312,681 $1,374,684 $1,439,678 $1,507,809 21 DSC - Annual De bt Se rvice (2) 5.45 5.59 4 .89 4 .58 3.71 3.00 2 .64 2 .50 2.87 3.25 (1) Cash reserve ratio target is at least 50% of O&M (o r 180 days). (2) Net Revenues A vailable for Debt Service targeted to be at least 1.30 times annual debt serv ice is proposed for rate setting . 207 % $1,091,890 4 .89 Page A - 2 P Iby RIO .1 1271472021 Tow n of Jack son, WY W ater Fi nan cial Pl an and Rate Study Water Project ed Ser vi ce Ch arg e Re ve nue FILE: JAWY W SCHEDULE: Wat er -CASH FLOW RANGE: Water_CASHFLOW3 Line No. Description 1 Volu me Revenues 2 Annual Growth Revenues 3 R ate Increase Rev enues 4 Total Volume Revenues (1) Water Consumer Charge Revenue 5 Retail 6 A nnua l Gro wth (A cc ounts) 7 Rate Increase 8 Total Water Cons umer Charge Revenue 9 Tota l Wa te r User Charge Rev en ue 10 Annual Growth 11 Rate Increase 12 To ta l Wate r User Charge Rev en ue Pr ojected 2020(1) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 $1,697,293 $1,830,626 $1,866,656 $2,036,304 $2,221,148 $2,444,966 $2,691,374 $2,935,153 $3,200,713 $3,489,977 42,567 36,436 19,014 20,535 22,178 24,444 26,644 28,775 31,077 33,937 0 0 152,355 166,186 203,912 224,464 219,612 239,483 261,128 284,733 $1,739,861 $1,867,063 $2,038,025 $2,223,025 $2,447,238 $2,693,874 $2,937,630 $3,203,412 $3,492,918 $3,808,647 Test Year 2022 $1,866,656 19,014 152,355 $2,038,025 $613,250 $633,584 $648,838 $708,973 $774,576 $853,973 $941,508 $1,028,360 $1,123,083 $1,226,380 20,334 15,254 7,618 8,228 8,886 9,796 10,677 11,531 12,454 13,601 0 0 52,516 57,376 70,512 77,739 76,175 83,191 90,843 99,198 $633,584 $648,838 $708,973 $774,576 $853,973 $941,508 $648,838 7,618 52,516 $708,973 $1,028,360 $1,123,083 $1,226,380 $1,339,180 $2,310,543 $2,464,211 $2,515,494 $2,745,276 $2,995,724 $3,298,940 $3,632,882 $3,963,514 $4,323,796 $4,716,357 62,902 51,690 26,632 28,763 31,064 34,239 37,321 40,307 43,531 47,539 0 0 204,871 223,562 274,424 302,203 295,787 322,674 351,971 383,932 $2,373,445 $2,515,901 $2,746,998 $2,997,601 $3,301,212 $3,635,382 $3,965,990 $4,326,495 $4,719,298 $5,147,827 $2,515,494 26,632 204,871 $2,746,998 13 Ca pa city Fee Reven ue 14 Ca pacity Fee Re ve nue (1) $122,225 $83,274 $163,656 $168,566 $173,623 $181,885 $187,342 $192,962 $198,751 $208,151 15 Total Capacity Fee Revenue $122,225 $83,274 $163,656 $168,566 $173,623 $181,885 $187,342 $192,962 $198,751 $208,151 (1) FY 2020 actual revenue per Town staff. $163,656 $163,656 Page A-3 P Iby Raftr li, 12/14/2021 Tow n of Jack son, WY FILE: JAWY W W ater Fi nan cial Pl an and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Wat er -CASH FLOW Water RANGE: Water_CASHFLOW4 Capital Improvem ent Subf und C ash Flow Line No. Description Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 Cash Sources 1 Transfer from Operations Subfund $724,350 $565,515 $530,210 $613,743 $1,143,914 $1,885,590 $333,249 $1,356,542 $2,394,015 $2,468,207 2 Capa city Fee Revenues 122,225 83,274 163,656 168,566 173,623 181,885 187,342 192,962 198,751 208,151 3 Interest 0 18,249 16,249 36,024 18,249 116,484 43,446 43,446 43,446 43,446 4 Total Cash Sources 846,575 667,038 712,116 818,333 1,335,787 2,183,959 564,036 1,592,950 2,636,211 2,719,803 $530,210 163,656 18,249 5 Cash or Grant Funded CIP 116,600 667,038 712,116 818,333 1,335,787 1,176,112 564,036 1,592,950 2,636,211 2,719,803 6 Debt Funded CIP 0 0 664,470 710,983 564,990 3,929,373 4,204,429 0 0 0 7 Total Capital Expenditures 116,600 667,038 1,376,586 1,529,316 1,900,777 5,105,485 4,768,466 1,592,950 2,636,211 2,719,803 712,116 712,116 664,470 Capital Funding 8 Net Bond Proceeds (1) 9 Grants 10 Total Capital Funding Sources O 0 1,375,453 0 4,494,363 0 4,204,429 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 1,375,453 0 4,494,363 0 4,204,429 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 1,376,586 1,375,453 0 1,375,453 0 11 Net Ca shflo w 729,975 0 710,983 (710,983) 3,929,373 (2,921,525) 0 (0) 0 0 12 Beginning of Year Cash Balanc e 0 729,975 729,975 1,440,958 729,975 4,659,348 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 13 End of Ye ar C ash Balance 729,975 729,975 1,440,958 729,975 4,659,348 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 14 Unspent Bond Proceeds 0 0 710,983 0 3,929,373 0 0 0 0 0 15 End of Yea r C ash Ba la nce Less Unspe nt Bond Pro ceeds 729,975 729,975 729,975 729,975 729,975 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 16 Cash Re serves Require ment (2) 729,975 729,975 729,975 729,975 729,975 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 17 End of Year Cash Balance - Unrestricted $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 710,983 729,975 1,440,958 710,983 729,975 729,975 $0 (1) Net bond proceeds are bond proceeds less issuance expenses and debt service reserves included in the gross bond proceeds . (2) Cash Reserv es include: 5 -year average of ca sh -funde d CIP proje cts. FY 2020 through FY2024 and FY 2025 thr ough FY 2029 . Page A - 4 P Iby Raftr li, 1271472021 Town of Ja ck son, WY FILE: JAWY W Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rat e Study SCHEDULE: Water -C ASH FLOW Water R ANGE: Water_C ASHFLOW Beginning of Year Cash Bal ance Calculation Line No. De scription Pr ojected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 Interest Calculation Beginning of Year Cash Balance 1 Operations Subfund $4,779,242 $4,536,993 $4,467,750 $4,523,773 $4,603,703 $4,253,053 $3,234,172 $3,824,438 $3,512,658 $2,419,614 2 Capital Improvement Subfund 0 729,975 729,975 1,440,958 729,975 4,659,348 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 1,737,822 3 Total 4,779,242 5,266,968 5,197,724 5,964,731 5,333,678 8,912,401 4,971,994 5,562,260 5,250,480 4,157,436 4 Total Fund Interest Earnings 95,585 131,674 129,943 149,118 133,342 222,810 124,300 139,057 131,262 103,936 5 Allocated Interest Earnings (1) 6 Ope ra tio ns Subfund 95,585 113,425 111,694 113,094 115,093 106,326 80,854 95,611 87,816 60,490 7 Capital Improv ement Subfund 0 18,249 18,249 36,024 18,249 116,484 43,446 43,446 43,446 43,446 8 Total 95,585 131,674 129,943 149,118 133,342 222,810 124,300 139,057 131,262 103,936 $4,467,750 729,975 5,197,724 129,943 111,694 18,249 9 Beginning of Year Cash Balance 10 Operations Subfund 100% 11 Capital Improvement Subfund 0% 12 To tal 100 % 86% 86 % 76 % 86% 48% 65 % 69 % 67% 58% 14% 14% 24% 14% 52% 35% 31% 33% 42% 129,943 86% 14% (1) Allocated based on Be ginning of Ye ar Cash Balance by subfund. 100 % 100% 100% 100 % 100 % 100% 100% 100 % 100 % 100 % PI rd by Raftr li, Page A-5 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Wastewater Financial Plan SCHEDULE: O&M Base O&M By Expense Type RANGE: W_OM Water 2020 Expense Type Expense Estimate Water and Operations PER Salaries & Wages - Regular $302,184 PER Buyout- Compensated Absences 2,928 PER Overtime 7,500 PER Holiday Pay- PTO Buyback 676 PER FICA & Medicare 23,721 BEN Health Insurance 95,590 BEN Vision Insurance 949 BEN Dental Insurance 4,313 BEN Wyoming Retirement 46,757 BEN GASB 68 Pension 0 BEN Workers' Compensation 3,845 BEN State Unemployment 371 BEN Disability/Life Insurance 2,292 SUP General/Office Supplies 0 SUP Uniforms 1,385 MAT Small Tools & Equipment <$10K 5,185 MAT Water/Sewer Supplies 43,066 MAT Postage 0 SUP Radio Services 0 OPE Printing & Publication 159 OTH Dues & Subscriptions 1,534 UTL Utilities 25,100 SER Professional services 200,000 MAT Repair & Maint - Vehicles 15 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Parts 5,235 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Labor 3,146 MAT Repair & Maint - Machinery 5,477 MAT Petroleum Products 5,973 MAT Repairs & Maint - Water Tanks 20,000 MAT Repair & Maint- Dist Syst 49,959 MAT Repair & Maint- Fire Hydrants 10,000 MAT Repair & Maint - Buildings 20,000 SER Trash Collection 0 OPE Uniform Cleaning 892 OTH Training, Travel, & Meetings 2,727 OTH Central Equipment Rental 0 SER IT Services 14,720 SER Property Insurance 4,882 SER Liability Insurance 2,703 SER Equipment Rental 0 Well Operations MAT Small Tools & Equipment <$10K 407 SUP Water/Sewer Supplies 29,148 UTL Utilities 106,107 UTL Utilities- Thaw Wells 83 OTH water/Sewer- Refuge Easement 33,945 UTL Phone Communications 0 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Parts 2,562 MAT Repair & Maint- Shop Labor 2,490 MAT Repair& Maint- Machinery 29,859 MAT Petroleum Products 1,392 OPE Repair & Maint - Buildings 40,000 SER EPA Sampling 8,548 SER Property Insurance 5,001 SER Equipment Rental 0 Water Billing and Accounting PER Salaries & Wages - Regular 54,375 PER Buyout- Compensated Absences 0 PER Overtime 2,024 PER FICA & Medicare 4,118 BEN Health Insurance 12,932 BEN Vision Insurance 115 BEN Dental Insurance 572 BEN Wyoming Retirement 8,550 BEN GASB 68 Pension 0 BEN Workers' Compensation 616 BEN State Unemployment 146 BEN Disability/Life Insurance 533 SUP General/Office Supplies 1,483 SUP Uniforms 0 SUP Water/Sewer Supplies 74,000 SER Professional Services 0 SER Banking Fees 5,086 SER Credit Card Fees 8,684 SER Utility Billing Services 9,878 MAT Repair & Maint - Vehicles 0 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Parts 2,501 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Labor 523 MAT Petroleum Products 303 OPE Uniform Cleaning 194 OTH Training, Travel, & Meetings 875 SER IT Services 5,044 SER Liability Insurance 488 IC Transfers Indirect Cost Allocations - GF Total O&M 626,362 $1,992,228 Page A - 6 Prepared hs RaJtelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water Finan cial Plan and Rate Study Water Fu nd Wa ter O&M Descripti on FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Water_OM R AN GE: Water_ OM Estimated Pr ojected T est Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Materials $208,093 $218,498 $229,423 $240,894 $252,938 $265,585 $278,865 $292,808 $307,448 $322,821 Personnel 397,526 417,402 438,272 460,186 483,195 507,355 532,723 559,359 587,327 616,693 Benefits 177,581 186,460 195,783 205,572 215,851 226,643 237,976 249,874 262,368 275,486 Supplies 106,016 111,317 116,883 122,727 128,863 135,306 142,072 149,175 156,634 164,466 Operating 41,245 43,307 45,473 47,746 50,134 52,640 55,272 58,036 60,938 63,985 Utility 131,290 137,855 144,747 151,985 159,584 167,563 175,941 184,738 193,975 203,674 Other 39,081 40,253 41,461 42,705 43,986 45,306 46,665 48,065 49,507 50,992 Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Se rvices 265,034 272,985 281,175 289,610 298,298 307,247 316,464 325,958 335,737 345,809 Indirect Costs 626,362 657,680 690,564 725,092 761,347 799,414 839,385 881,354 925,422 971,693 2022 $229,423 $438,272 $195,783 $116,883 $45,473 $144,747 $41,461 $0 $281,175 $690,564 To tal Water $1,992,228 $2,085,757 $2,183,780 $2,286,516 $2,394,196 $2,507,060 $2,625,362 $2,749,368 $2,879,356 $3,015,618 Annual Escalation Rate Cumulative Escalation Rate $2,183,780 4.69% 4.69% 4.70 % 4 .70% 9.61 % 14.77% 4.71 % 4.71% 20.18 % 25.84% 4.72 % 4.72 % 31 .78% 38.00 % 4.73% 4 .73 % 44 .53 % 51.37 % Prepared by Ra f'ielia' Page A-7 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate Study Inputs and Assumptions Existing Water Debt Ser vice Fu nd Nam e 2020 2021 2022 2023 1997 WWDC Note 41,247 41,248 40,779 40,779 2010 WWDC Note 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 FILE: JAWY_W W SCHEDULE: Setup R ANGE: W_W W_Setup 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 66,970 Total Existing Water Debt Service $108,217 $108,218 $107,749 $107,749 $66,970 $66,970 $66,970 $66,970 $66,970 $66,970 Prepa re d by Raftelis Page A-8 12/14/2021 Water Capital Pro 'ects - CIP 2 Before Inflation Line No Town of Jacks on, WY Water a nd S ew er Fi na ncial Pl an and R at e St udy Water CIP & Debt Descripti on 1 N. King Stree t Water De sign 2 High School/South Park PRV Design 3 Well 97 4 Rancher Street Water Design 5 Well 99 Design 6 Fla t Cree k So uth Water Re pla cement D esign 6 7 N. King Street Water Construction 6 8 High School/South Park PRV Construction 6 9 Zone 3 Tank and Supply Study 3 10 Gregory Lane Water Replacement Design 6 11 Rancher Stree t Wa ter Co nstructio n 6 12 Well 99 Construction 2 13 Flat Creek South Water Replacement Construction 6 14 Vine Street Water Replacement Design 6 15 Snow King Avenue Water Replacement Design 6 16 Grego ry Lane Water Re placeme nt Co nstruction 6 17 W. Aspen Street Wate r Replacement Design 6 18 Spruce Drive Water Replacement Design 6 19 Zone 3 Tank Design 3 20 Pine Drive Wate r Re place me nt Design 6 21 V ine Stree t Water Replaceme nt Co nstruction 6 22 Snow King Avenue Water Replacement Construction 6 23 N. Millward Phase 1 Design 6 24 W. Aspen Street Wate r Replacement Construction 6 25 Spruce Drive Wa te r Re place me nt Co nstructio n 6 26 Zone 3 Tank Construction 3 27 Pine Drive Water Replacement Construction 6 28 East Broadway Water Replacement Design 6 29 N. Millward Phase 2 Design 6 30 N. Millward Pha se 1 Co nstruc tio n 6 31 5. Millward Water Replacement Design 6 32 Powerhorn Lane Water Replacement Design 6 33 Snow King Drive Water Line and Pump Station Design 6 34 N. Millward Phase 2 Construction 6 35 Ea st Bro adwa y Wate r Replacemen t Co ns tructio n 6 36 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 1 Water Replacemer 6 37 Broadway Hwy22 to Animal Hospital Water Replacem 6 38 S. Millward Water Replacement Construction 6 39 Powerhorn La ne Water Replacement Construction 6 40 Sno w Kin g Drive Water Line and Pump Sta tio n Co nstn 6 41 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 2 Water Replacemer 6 42 Crabtree Lane Water Replacement Design 6 43 Berger Lane Water Replacement Design 6 44 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 1 Water Replacemer 6 45 Bro adwa y Hwy 22 to Anima l Ho spital Wate r Replace m 6 46 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 2 Wate r Re place mer 6 47 Crabtree Lane Wate r Re place ment Co nstructio n 6 48 Berge r Lane Wate r Replaceme nt Co nstructio n 6 49 We ll Ho use SCADA Update 2 50 Hydrant Flow Test 6 51 Well House Flow M eter Replacement 2 52 Calibrate Hydraulic M odel 6 53 Virginian Lane Water Replacement Design 6 54 So uth G ro s Ven tre Wate r Repla ceme nt De sign 6 55 Virginian Lane Water Replacement Construction 6 56 South G ros Ventre Water Replacement Construction 6 57 Snow King Loop Water Replacement Design 6 58 Snow King Loop Wate r Replacement Construction 6 59 Sno w Kin g Loo p Wa ter Replace me nt De sign 6 60 Snow King Loop Wate r Replacement Construction 6 61 T otal Function 1 4 2 6 2 Gr owth N on - Growth Funding S ource 0% 100% C ash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Cash 0% 100 % C ash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Debt1 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Debt1 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100% C ash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100% C ash 50% 50 % Debt1 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% C ash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 2020 $11,900 9,700 75,000 2021 44,400 100 ,000 26,400 33,638 130,000 100,000 0% 100% Cash 5,000 222,600 0% 100% Cash 15,000 10,000 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 50% 50% Cash 50% 50% Cash 50% 50% Ca sh 50% 50% Cash 2022 74,000 270,250 621,000 343,800 2023 270,250 621,000 23,000 40,800 480,950 2024 2025 2026 480,950 19,000 13,600 461,200 12,300 299,600 264,950 264,950 47,700 247 ,100 177,000 2.997,700 2,997,700 160,500 57,700 34 ,500 309,950 2027 309,950 32,800 54,000 65,500 224,150 375,050 2028 224,150 375,050 33,400 18,700 213,550 351,300 425,550 FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: W CIP DEBT RA NGE: Water Debt 2029 T otal $11,900 9,700 75,000 44,400 100,000 26,400 33,638 130,000 100,000 74,000 540,500 1,242,000 343,800 23,000 40,800 961,900 19,000 13,600 461,200 12,300 299,600 529,900 47,700 247,100 177,000 5,995,400 160,500 57,700 34,500 619,900 32,800 54,000 65,500 448,300 750,100 33,400 18,700 213,550 427,100 351,300 702,600 425,550 851,100 42,700 42,700 68,800 68,800 20,700 20,700 217,450 217,450 242,900 242,900 0 0 0 0 0 227,600 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $116,600 $667,038 $1,309,050 $1,436,000 51,551,600 $3,894,950 $3,399,850 $1,061,450 $1,641,700 $1,582,950 $19,932,438 Prvarcdbr Pull., Page A - 9 12/14/2021 Water Capital Pr o ects - CIP 2 After I nflation Line No Town of Jacks on, WY Water a nd S ew er Fi na ncial Pl an and R at e St udy Water CIP & Debt Descripti on 1 N. Kin g Stree t Water De sign 2 High School/South Park PRV Design 3 Well#7 4 Rancher Street Water Design 5 Well #9 Design 6 Fla t Cree k So uth Water Replacement D esign 7 N. Kin g Street Water Construction 8 High School/South Park PRV Construction 9 Zon e 3 Tan k and Supply Study 10 Gregory Lane Water Replacement Design 11 Rancher Street Water Construction 12 We ll #9 Co nstruction 13 Flat Creek South Water Replacement Construction 14 Vine Street Water Replacement Design 15 Sn ow Kin g Av enue Water Replacemen t Design 16 Gregory Lane Water Replacement Construction 17 W. Aspen Street Wate r Replacement Design 18 Spruce Driv e Water Replacement Design 19 Zone 3 Tank Design 20 Pine Driv e Water Replacement Design 21 Vine Street Water Replacement Construction 22 Sno w Kin g Ave nue Wate r Re place men t Co ns truc tio n 23 N. Millward Phase 1 Design 24 W. A spen Street Water Replacement Construction 25 Spruce Drive Water R eplacement Construction 26 Zone 3 Tank Construction 27 Pine Drive Water R eplacement Construction 28 East Broadway Water Replacement Design 29 N. Millward Phase 2 Design 30 N. Millward Phase 1 Construction 31 S. Millward Water Replacement Design 32 Powerhorn La ne Water Replacement Design 33 Snow King Drive Water Line and P ump Station D esign 34 N. Millward Phase 2 Construction 35 East Broadway Water Replacement Construction 36 Upper Cache Creek Driv e Phase 1 Water Replacemer 37 Broadway Hwy 22 to Animal Hospital Water Replacem 38 S. Millward Water Replacement Construction 39 Powerhorn Lane Water Replacement Construction 40 Sn ow Kin g Drive Water Line and Pump Station Constn 41 Uppe r Cache Cre ek Drive Pha se 2 Wate r Re place mer 42 Crabtree Lan e Water Replacement Design 43 B erger Lane Water R eplacement D esign 44 Upper Cache Creek Driv e Phase 1 Water Replacemer 45 Broadway Hwy 22 to A nimal Hospital Water Replacem 46 Uppe r Cache Cre ek Drive Pha se 2 Wate r Re place me r 47 Crabtree Lan e Water Replacement Construction 48 B erger Lane Water R eplacement Construction 49 We ll Ho use SCAD A Update 50 Hydrant Flo w Te st 51 Well Ho us e Flo w Me te r Re place me nt 52 Calibra te Hydra ulic Mo de l 53 Virginian Lane Water Replac eme nt De sign 54 South Gros Ven tre Water Replacement Design 55 Virginian Lane Wate r Re pla ce me nt Co nstructio n 56 South Gros Ven tre Water Replacement Construction 57 Snow Kin g Loop Water Replacement D esign 58 Snow Kin g Loop Water R eplacement Construction 59 Snow Kin g Loop Water R eplacement Design 60 Sno w King Loo p Wa te r Re place me nt Co nstruction Fu nctio n Gr owth 0% 0% 0% 0% 50 % 0% 50 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 50 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 50% 50% N on -Growth 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 50 % 100 % 50 % 100% 100% 100% 100% 50 % 100% 100% 100% 100% 100 % 100% 50% 100% 100% 100 % 100% 100% 100% 50 % 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% Fu nding S ource Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash D ebts Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Debt1 Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Debts Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Ca sh Cash Cash Cash Cash Ca sh Cash Cash Cash Cash Ca sh Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash 2020 2021 2022 $11,900 $0 $0 9,700 0 0 75,000 0 0 O 44,400 0 O 100,000 0 O 26,400 0 O 33,638 0 O 130,000 0 O 100,000 0 O 0 74,000 O 0 270,250 O 0 664,470 O 0 367,866 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 5,000 222,600 0 15,000 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 2024 2025 $o $o $o O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 270,250 0 0 710,983 0 0 O 0 0 26,333 0 0 40,800 0 0 480,950 589,184 0 O 23,276 0 O 16,661 0 O 564,990 0 O 15,068 0 O 367,023 0 O 324,575 347,295 O 0 62,525 O 0 323,898 O 0 232,011 O 0 3 ,929,373 O 0 210,383 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026 4,204,429 2027 $o $o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 80,927 0 48,388 0 434,721 465,151 O 49,224 O 81,039 O 98,298 O 336,389 O 562,849 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2028 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 359,936 602,248 53,633 30,028 342,915 564,111 683,340 FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: W CIP DEBT RA NGE: 2029 $o $00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 366,919 603,599 731,174 O 73,367 0 118,211 O 35,566 O 373,620 O 417,347 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 227,600 O 0 25,000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water_ Debt 10 -Year T otal $11,900 9,700 75,000 44,400 100,000 26,400 33,638 130,000 100,000 74,000 540,500 1,375,453 367,866 26,333 40,800 1,070,134 23,276 16,661 564,990 15,068 367,023 671,871 62,525 323,898 232,011 8,133,803 210,383 80,927 48,388 899,872 49,224 81,039 98,298 696,325 1,165,097 53,633 30,028 709,833 1,167,710 1,414,514 73,367 118,211 35,566 373,620 417,347 61 To tal CIP $116,600 $667,038 $1,376,586 $1,529,316 $1,900,777 $5,105,485 $4,768,466 $1,592,950 $2,636,211 $2,719,803 $22,413,231 Page A - 10 P, njarcd ln- Rsfa' tn 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study In puts and Ass umpti ons Water Beginning of Year Cash Water Operating Fund June 30, 2019 Cash and cash equivalents $265,370 Investments 4,520,450 Account receivable 184,289 Accounts payable (190,867) Balance $4,779,242 Water CIP Fund 2019 Cash $0 Accounts Receivable 0 Accounts Payable 0 Balance $0 Prepared by Raftelis Page A - 11 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate Study Inputs and Assumptions FILE: JAWY_W W SCHEDULE: Setup R ANGE: W_W W_Setup Escalation Factors Line No . Description Escalati on List 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 1 Interest Earning Rate Interest_Rate 2 .0% 2.5% 2 .5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2 .5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2 Other Revenues Oth er Rev 1.0 % 1 .0 % 1 .0% 1.0 % 1.0 % 1.0% 1.0 % 1.0 % 1.0% 3 Tap Fee TapFee_Rev 2.0% 2.0% 2.0 % 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0 % 4 Water Capacity Fee Increase/D ecreas e WPIF 0.0 % 305.0 % 3 .0% 3.0 % 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0 % 3.0 % 3.0% 5 Wastewater Capacity Increase/D ecrease WW_PIF 0.0% 109.0% 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0 % 6 Capital Program Co sts (CIP) CIP 0.0 % 7 .0 % 7 .0% 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0% 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0% 7 Cumulative CIP Incre ase 0.0% 7.0% 14.5% 22.5% 31 .1% 40.3% 50.1% 60 .6% 71.8% 8 Materials Materials 5.0 % 5 .0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 9 Personnel Personnel 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 10 Be nefits Ben efits 5.0 % 5 .0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 11 Supplies Supplies 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 12 Operating Expense s Op_Ex 5.0 % 5 .0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 13 Constant Constant 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 % 14 Utilities Util 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5 .0% 5 .0% 5.0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5 .0% 15 Other Other 3.0 % 3 .0% 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3 .0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 16 Indirect Costs Indirect 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 17 Capital (O&M) Cap_O M 5.0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5 .0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 18 Services Services 3 .0 % 3.0% 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3 .0% 3.0% Prepa re d by Roftelis Page A - 12 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Accounts A ccounts by Meter Size - Water Utility R ANGE: Water Accounts Water A ccounts by Meter Size Residential Subtotal: Residential Commercial Subtotal: Commercial Employees Subtotal: Employees Melody Ranch Subtotal: M elody R anch Multi Family 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter 2,453 2,507 2,535 2,563 2,591 2,620 2,649 2,678 2,707 2,737 Water Base Fee 2" Meter 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Water B ase Fe e Senior Citizen 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee 1" Meter 234 239 242 245 248 251 254 257 260 263 Water Base Fee 1.5" Meter 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Water Base Fee 3" Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee 6" Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2,719 2,778 2,809 2,840 2,871 2,903 2,935 2,967 2,999 3,032 Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter 410 419 424 429 434 439 444 449 454 459 Water Base Fee 2" Meter 80 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Water Base Fee Senior Citizen 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee Social Services 2 Meter" 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Water Base Fee Social Service 3/4 Meter" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee Social Service 1 Meter" 151 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168 170 Water Ba se Fee 1" Me ter 119 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 Water Base Fee 1.5" Meter 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Water Base Fee 3" Meter 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Water Base Fee 4" Meter 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Water Base Fee 6" Meter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Base Fe e 4" Me te r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee 3 Creek 3/4" Meter 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter Water Base Fee 1" Meter Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter Water Base Fee 2" Meter 790 807 816 825 834 843 852 861 870 879 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 Water Base Fee 2" Meter 42 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 Water Base Fee Social Services 2 M eter" 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Water Base Fee Social Service 3/4 M eter" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Ba se Fee So cial Service 1 Me te r" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water Base Fee 1" Meter 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Water Base Fee 1. 5" Meter 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Water Base Fee 3" M eter 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Water Base Fee 4" Meter 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Subtotal: Multi Family 187 191 193 195 197 199 201 203 205 207 Page A - 13 Prepare d by Rafte lis 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Accounts A ccounts by Meter Size - Water Utility R ANGE: Water Accounts Water A ccounts by Meter Size 3 Creek Ranch 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee 3 Creek 3/4 " Meter 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Water Base Fe e 3 Creek 1.5" Met er 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Subtotal: 3 Creek Ranch 113 117 119 121 123 125 127 129 131 133 Government Subtotal: Government Rafter J Water Ba se Fee 2" M eter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Subtotal: Rafter J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Schools Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 Water Base Fee 2" Meter 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 Water Base Fee 1" Meter 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Water Base Fee 1.5" Meter 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Water Base Fee 3" Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee 4" Meter 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Water Base Fee 6" Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 Subtotal: Schools Water Ba se Fee 3/4" M eter 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Water Base Fee 2" Meter 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Water Base Fee 1" Meter 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Water Base Fee 1. 5" Meter 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Water Base Fee 3" Meter 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Water Ba se Fee 4" Me ter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Base Fee 4" Meter 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Total Water Accounts 3,927 4,011 4,055 4,099 4,143 4,188 4,233 4,278 4,323 4,369 Page A - 14 Prepare d by Rafte lis 6/1/2022 Town of Jackson, WY Water Financial Plan and Rate Study FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Accounts Growth in Accounts 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential 2 .20% 2.20% 1 .10 % 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10 % 1.10 % 1.10% Commercial 2.20% 2 .20 % 1.10% 1.10 % 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10 % M elody Ranch Multi Family 2 .20% 2.20 % 1 .10% 1 .10 % 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10 % 3 Creek Ranch 1.00 % 4 .00% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10 % 1.10 % 1.10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10% Irrigation -only Government Rafter J Schools Prepare d by Rafte lis Page A - 15 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Water - RTS Ser vice Charges By Meter Si ze - Water Utility RANGE: Water_RTS Monthly W ater Ser vi ce Ch arge Meter Size 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Water Base Fee 3/4" Meter $7.22 $7.22 $7 .80 $842 $9 .18 $10.01 $10.81 $11.67 $12.60 $13.61 Water Base Fee 2" Meter 25 .31 25.31 27.33 29.52 32.18 35 .07 37 .88 40 .91 44.18 47.72 Water Base Fee Senior Citizen 3.61 3.61 3.90 4.21 4.59 5.00 5.40 5.84 6 .30 6 .81 Water B ase Fe e Social Services 2 Meter" 18 .98 18.98 20.50 22.14 24.13 26 .30 28 .41 30.68 33.13 35.78 Water Base Fee Social Service 3/4 Meter" 5.41 5 .41 5.84 6.31 6.88 7.50 8.10 8 .74 9 .44 10.20 Water Base Fee Social Service 1 Meter" 7.45 7.45 8 .05 8 .69 9 .47 10.32 11.15 12.04 13.01 14 .05 Water Base Fee 1" Meter 9 .93 9.93 10.72 11.58 12.62 13 .76 14 .86 16.05 17.33 18.72 Water Base Fee 1.5" Meter 17.41 17.41 18 .80 20 .31 22 .13 24.13 26.06 28.14 30.39 32 .82 Water Base Fee 3" Meter 57 .54 57.54 62.14 67.11 73.15 79 .74 86 .12 93.01 100.45 108.48 Water Base Fee 4" Meter 86.26 86 .26 93.16 100.61 109.67 119.54 129.10 139 .43 150 .58 162.63 Water Base Fee 6" Meter 159.34 159.34 172 .09 185 .85 202 .58 220.81 238.48 257.56 278.16 300 .41 Water Base Fee 4" Meter 86 .26 86.26 93.16 100.61 109.67 119 .54 129 .10 139.43 150.58 162.63 Water Base Fee 3 Cre ek 3/4" Meter 143.53 143.53 155 .01 167 .41 182 .48 198.90 214.82 232.00 250.56 270.61 Page A - 16 Prepare d by Rafte lis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water Financi al Plan a nd Rate Study SCHEDULE: Acc ounts Water Service Charg e Revenue Water Service Charg e Revenue: Base 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential $244,687 $249,874 $255,149 $278,567 $304,099 $335,006 $369,134 $402,960 $439,836 $480,033 Commercial 126,373 128,745 131,116 142,884 155,696 171,214 188,265 205,098 223,420 243,361 Employees 1,419 1,419 1,419 1,532 1,655 1,804 1,966 2,123 2,293 2,477 Melody Ranch 390 390 390 422 455 496 541 584 631 681 M ulti Family 34,029 34,747 35,465 38,525 41,847 45,875 50,289 54,620 59,322 64,427 3 Creek Ranch 180,934 192,991 199,880 219,591 241,176 267,262 296,089 324,932 356,494 391,027 Government 17,550 17,550 17,550 18,955 20,471 22,313 24,321 26,267 28,369 30,638 RafterJ 304 304 304 328 354 386 421 455 491 530 Irrigation -o nly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 7,564 7,564 7,564 8,169 8,823 9,617 10,482 11,321 12,227 13,205 Total Water Serv ice Charge Reve nue: Base $613,250 $633,584 $648,838 $708,973 $774,576 $853,973 $941,508 $1,028,360 $1,123,083 $1,226,380 Water Service Charge Revenu e: Gro wth Residential $5,188 $5,274 $2,783 $3,006 $3,247 $3,649 $3,977 $4,295 $4,639 $5,162 Comme rc ial 2,371 2,371 1,184 1,279 1,381 1,506 1,641 1,772 1,914 2,067 Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Melody Ranch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi Family 718 718 206 222 240 262 285 308 333 359 3 Creek Ranch 12,057 6,889 3,445 3,720 4,018 4,380 4,774 5,156 5,568 6,013 G overnment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rafter J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Irrigation -o nly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Water Service Charge R eve nue: Gro wth $20,334 $15,254 $7,618 $8,228 $8,886 $9,796 $10,677 $11,531 $12,454 $13,601 Water Service Charge Revenu e: Rate Increase Residential $0 $0 $20,635 $22,526 $27,661 $30,479 $29,849 $32,580 $35,558 $38,816 Commercial 0 0 10,584 11,533 14,137 15,545 15,192 16,550 18,027 19,634 Employees 0 0 114 123 149 162 157 170 183 198 Melody Ranch 0 0 31 34 41 45 43 47 50 55 Multi Family 0 0 2,854 3,100 3,788 4,152 4,046 4,394 4,772 5,183 3 Creek Ranch 0 0 16,266 17,865 22,067 24,448 24,069 26,407 28,965 31,763 Government 0 0 1,404 1,516 1,842 2,008 1,946 2,101 2,269 2,451 RafterJ 0 0 24 26 32 35 34 36 39 42 Irrigatio n -o nly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schoo ls 0 0 605 654 794 866 839 906 978 1,056 Total Water Service Charge Reve nue: Rate Increase $0 $0 $52,516 $57,376 $70,512 $77,739 $76,175 $83,191 $90,843 $99,198 Projected Water Service Charge Rev enues - Full Year Increa ses Residential $249,874 $255,149 $278,567 $304,099 $335,006 $369,134 $402,960 $439,836 $480,033 $524,010 Co mmercial 128,745 131,116 142,884 155,696 171,214 188,265 205,098 223,420 243,361 265,062 Employees 1,419 1,419 1,532 1,655 1,804 1,966 2,123 2,293 2,477 2,675 Melody Ranch 390 390 422 455 496 541 584 631 681 736 M ulti Family 34,747 35,465 38,525 41,847 45,875 50,289 54,620 59,322 64,427 69,969 3 Creek Ranch 192,991 199,880 219,591 241,176 267,262 296,089 324,932 356,494 391,027 428,804 G overnment 17,550 17,550 18,955 20,471 22,313 24,321 26,267 28,369 30,638 33,089 RafterJ 304 304 328 354 386 421 455 491 530 573 Irrigation -o nly 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 7,564 7,564 8,169 8,823 9,617 10,482 11,321 12,227 13,205 14,261 Total Pro jected Water Service Charge Reve nues - Fu ll Year Increa se $633,584 $648,838 $708,973 $774,576 $853,973 $941,508 $1,028,360 $1,123,083 $1,226,380 $1,339,180 Page A - 17 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Fina ncial Pl an and Rate Stud) Billed Volume - Water Utility (kgal) Billed Water Volume (kgal) R esidential Comme rcial Employe es Me lo dy Ranch M ulti Family 3 Creek Ranch Irrigation only Governme nt R after J Schools Sewer Only To tal Billed Water Vo lume (kgal) FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: W ater Usage RANGE: Water - Billed Vol Project ed Project ed Pr oj ected Proj ected Project ed Project ed Proje cted Project ed Projected Proje cted 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 273,335 279,266 282,383 285,500 288,617 291,834 295,051 298,268 301,485 304,803 354,454 362,082 366,120 370,158 374,196 378,234 382,272 386,310 390,348 394,386 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 3,077 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 91,390 93,345 94,323 95,301 96,279 97,257 98,235 99,213 100,191 101,169 47,286 48,959 49,795 50,631 51,467 52,303 53,139 53,975 54,811 55,647 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 74,589 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 21,698 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 6,404 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 872,277 889,464 898,433 907,402 916,371 925,440 934,509 943,578 952,647 961,817 Prepared by Raftelis Page A - 18 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Fina ncial Pl an and Rate Stud) Billed Volume - Water Utility (kgal) Water Volume Rates ($/kgal) R esidential Commercial Employe es Me lo dy Ranch M ulti Family 3 Creek Ranch - Irrigation 3 Creek Ranch Irrigation -only Go vernment Rafter J Schools Se wer Only Volu me Use By Tier Residential Commercial Employees Melo dy Ranch Mu lti Family 3 Creek Ranch Irrigatio n -only FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Water Volum e Rates RANGE: Water_VolRate Actual Projected Proj ected Pr oj ected Pr ojected Projected Project ed Projected Projected Project ed 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 $2.12 $2.12 $2 .29 $2 .47 $2 .70 $2 .94 $3 .17 $3.43 $3.70 $4 .00 2 .12 2.12 2.29 2.47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3 .43 3.70 4.00 2 .12 2.12 2.29 2.47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3 .43 3.70 4.00 2.12 2.12 2 .29 2 .47 2 .70 2 .94 3 .17 3.43 3.70 4 .00 2 .12 2.12 2.29 2.47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3 .43 3.70 4.00 2.12 2 .12 2.29 2.47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3.43 3 .70 4.00 1.10 1 .10 1.18 1.28 1.39 1.52 1.64 1.77 1 .91 2.06 2 .12 2.12 2.29 2.47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3 .43 3.70 4.00 2.12 2.12 2 .29 2 .47 2 .70 2 .94 3 .17 3.43 3.70 4 .00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 2.12 2 .12 2.29 2.47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3.43 3 .70 4.00 2.12 2.12 2 .12 2 .12 2 .12 2 .12 2 .12 2.12 2.12 2 .12 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100 .00% 100 .00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100. 00% 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100 .00% 100 .00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100 .00 % 100 .00 % 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00 % 100 .00% 100.00% 100. 00% 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100 .00% 100 .00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100 .00 % 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00 % 100 .00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00 % 100 .00 % 100 .00% 100 .00 % 100 .00% 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100 .00% 100. 00% 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100 .00% 100 .00 % 100.00% 100.00% Prepared by Raftelis Page A - 19 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: J AWY W Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: W ater V olume Revenue Billed Volume - Water Utility (kgal) R AN GE: Water_VolRev Water Volume Revenue: Base 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential $567,040 $579,398 $591,971 $646,464 $705,887 $777,817 $857,271 $936,058 $1,021,965 $1,115,626 Commercial 734,693 750,852 767,010 837,609 914,595 1,007,783 1,110,337 1,211,966 1,322,750 1,443,502 Employees 244 244 244 263 284 310 338 365 394 426 Me lody Ra nch 93 93 93 101 109 119 129 140 151 163 Multi Family 188,247 192,362 196,477 214,418 233,973 257,647 283,688 309,464 337,549 368,146 3 Cre ek Ranch 79,271 89,973 93,157 102,327 112,369 124,505 137,915 151,329 166,007 182,065 Irrigation -only 158,129 158,129 158,129 170,779 184,441 201,041 219,135 236,665 255,599 276,047 Government 46,000 46,000 46,000 49,680 53,654 58,483 63,746 68,846 74,354 80,302 Rafter J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 13,577 13,576 13,576 14,663 15,836 17,261 18,814 20,319 21,945 23,701 Sewer Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To tal Water Volume Reve nue: Base $1,787,293 $1,830,626 $1,866,656 $2,036,304 $2,221,148 $2,444,966 $2,691,374 $2,935,153 $3,200,713 $3,489,977 Water V olume Re venue: Gro wth Residential $12,360 $12,574 $6,608 $7,137 $7,708 $8,671 $9,451 $10,207 $11,024 $12,280 Co mmercial 16,171 16,171 8,561 9,245 9,985 10,884 11,863 12,812 13,837 14,944 Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Melody Ranch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi Family 4,145 4,145 2,073 2,239 2,418 2,636 2,873 3,103 3,351 3,619 3 Creek Ranch 9,892 3,547 1,772 1,914 2,067 2,253 2,456 2,653 2,865 3,094 Irrigation -only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Government 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rafte r J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sc hoo ls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sewer Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Wa ter Volume Rev enue: Growth $42,567 $36,436 $19,014 $20,535 $22,178 $24,444 $26,644 $28,775 $31,077 $33,937 Water Volume Rev enue: Rate Incre ase Residential $0 $0 $47,892 $52,294 $64,231 $70,793 $69,346 $75,711 $82,649 $90,244 Commercial 0 0 62,094 67,801 83,277 91,751 89,846 98,059 107,010 116,767 Employees 0 0 502 543 659 719 696 752 812 877 Me lody Ra nch 0 0 7 8 10 11 10 11 12 13 Multi Family 0 0 15,997 17,456 21,427 23,592 23,088 25,184 27,466 29,953 3 Cre ek Ranc h 0 0 8,445 9,274 11,454 12,688 12,489 13,701 15,026 16,476 Irrigation -o nly 0 0 12,650 13,662 16,600 18,094 17,531 18,933 20,448 22,084 Gove rnment 0 0 3,680 3,974 4,829 5,263 5,100 5,508 5,948 6,424 Ra fter J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 1,086 1,173 1,425 1,553 1,505 1,626 1,756 1,896 Sewe r Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To tal Water Volume Reve nue: Rate Increase $0 $0 $152,355 $166,186 $203,912 $224,464 $219,612 $239,483 $261,128 $284,733 Projected Wate r Volu me R even ue - Pro rated Residential $579,399 $591,972 $646,471 $705,895 $777,827 $857,281 $936,068 $1,021,976 $1,115,638 $1,218,149 Co mmerc ial 750,864 767,023 837,665 914,655 1,007,857 1,110,418 1,212,047 1,322,837 1,443,597 1,575,213 Employees 244 244 746 806 944 1,028 1,034 1,117 1,206 1,303 Melody Ranch 93 93 101 109 119 129 140 151 163 176 Multi Family 192,392 196,507 214,547 234,114 257,818 283,876 309,650 337,751 368,367 401,719 3 Creek Ranch 89,163 93,520 103,374 113,515 125,890 139,446 152,861 167,683 183,898 201,635 Irrigation -only 158,129 158,129 170,779 184,441 201,041 219,135 236,665 255,599 276,047 298,130 Gove rnment 46,000 46,000 49,680 53,654 58,483 63,746 68,846 74,354 80,302 86,726 Rafter J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sc hoo ls 13,577 13,576 14,663 15,836 17,261 18,814 20,319 21,945 23,701 25,597 Sewer Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota l Proje cted V olume Revenue $1,829,861 $1,867,063 $2,038,025 $2,223,025 $2,447,238 $2,693,874 $2,937,630 $3,203,412 $3,492,918 $3,808,647 Prepared by Raftelis Page A - 20 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study FILE: JAWY W SCHEDULE: Ac counts Water 3/4" Equi valent Met ers (ERUs) by Cl ass 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial 3,001 3,064 3,097 3,130 3,163 3,197 3,231 3,265 3,299 3,334 Commercial 1,483 1,512 1,528 1,543 1,558 1,574 1,589 1,604 1,620 1,635 Employees 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Melody Ranch 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 M ulti Family 547 558 561 563 566 569 571 574 577 579 3 Creek Ranch 243 252 256 261 265 269 274 278 282 287 Governme nt 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 Rafter J 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Irrigatio n -only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 116 116 116 116 116 116 116 116 116 116 To ta l Wa ter ERUs % Change 7,720 7,833 7,890 7,946 8,002 8,060 8,117 8,174 8,232 8,290 38.28% 1.46% 0 .73% 0 .71% 0.70% 0.72% 0.71 % 0.70 % 0.71 % 0 .70% Water 3/4" Equivalents by Meter Cos t 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential 2,842 2,903 2,935 2,968 3,000 3,033 3,066 3,099 3,132 3,167 Commercial 1,023 1,044 1,055 1,066 1,077 1,088 1,099 1,110 1,121 1,132 Employees 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Melody Ranch 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Multi Family 286 291 294 296 299 301 303 306 308 311 3 Creek Ranch 138 143 145 147 150 152 155 157 160 162 Governme nt 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Rafter J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Irrigatio n -only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 To ta l - Meter Replace ment Equiv ale nts 6,519 6,612 6,661 6,710 6,760 6,809 6,859 6,909 6,959 7,011 Prepa red by Raftelis Page A - 21 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study FILE: JAWY W SCHEDULE: Ac counts Water 3/4" Equi valents by Meter C ost 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial 2,842 2,903 2,935 2,968 3,000 3,033 3,066 3,099 3,132 3,167 Commercial 1,023 1,044 1,055 1,066 1,077 1,088 1,099 1,110 1,121 1,132 Employees 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Melody Ranch 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 M ulti Family 286 291 294 296 299 301 303 306 308 311 3 Creek Ranch 138 143 145 147 150 152 155 157 160 162 Governme nt 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Rafter J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Irrigatio n -only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 To ta l - Meter Replace ment Equiv ale nts 6,519 6,612 6,661 6,710 6,760 6,809 6,859 6,909 6,959 7,011 Prepa red by Raftelis Page A - 22 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY FILE: JAWY W Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Ac counts Capacity Fees by Meter Siz e - Water Utility RANGE: Wat er_PIFREV Water Capacity 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Water Capacity Fee Revenue $86,725 $83,274 $163,656 $168,566 $173,623 $181,885 $187,342 $192,962 $198,751 $208,151 Capacity Fee Increase 0.0 % 0.0% 305.0% 3 .0% 3.0% 3 .O % 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3 .0% Page A - 23 Prepa red by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Tow n of Jack son, WY FILE: JAWY W W ater Fi nan cial Pl an and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Wat er -CASH FLOW Water RANGE: Water_CASHFLOW5 Averag e R eside nti al Bill C alc ul ati on Line No. Description Pr ojected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 1 A nnua l Increase 0.0 % 0 .0 % 8 .0% 8.0% 9.0 % 9 .0 % 8 .0% 8.0% 8.0 % 8 .0 % 2 Effective Month of Adjustment (1=July) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 M onthly Fixed Charge $7.22 $7.22 $7.80 $8 .42 $9.18 $10.01 $10.81 $11 .67 $12 .60 $13.61 4 Volume Rate ($ per 1,000 gallon) 2.12 2.12 2.29 2 .47 2.70 2.94 3.17 3 .43 3 .70 4.00 5 Volume of Wa ter (1,000 gallons) 10.00 10 .00 10 .00 10.00 10.00 10 .00 10 .00 10.00 10.00 10 .00 6 Average Monthly Residential Bill $28.42 $28 .42 $30 .69 $33.15 $36.13 $39 .38 $42 .54 $45.94 $49.61 $53 .58 7 Average Annua l Reside ntial Bill (1) $341.04 $341.04 $368.32 $397 .79 $433.59 $472.61 $510.42 $551 .26 $595 .36 $642.99 8 .0 % $7.80 2.29 10 .00 $30 .69 $368.32 8 Compound Increase 0.0% 0 .0% 8 .0 % 16.6 % 27.1% 38 .6% 49 .7% 61.6 % 74.6% 88 .5% 8 .0% (1) Assumes re side ntial custo me r using 10,000 gallons p er m onthly period . Page A - 24 P Iby Raftr li, 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate Study Inputs and Assumptions Misc. Reven ues FILE: JAWY_W W SCHEDULE: Setup R ANGE: W_W W_Setup Line No. Account Description Account Number Escalati on Rate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 1 Miscellaneous Revenue Other_Rev 9,000 9,090 9,181 9,273 9,365 9,459 9,554 9,649 9,746 9,843 2 County Solar Farm EMP Match OtherRev 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Water Tap/Meter Fees TapFee_Rev 98,200 45,451 46,360 47,287 48,233 49,198 50,182 51,185 52,209 53,253 4 Water Interest Charges Other_Rev 6,316 6,379 6,443 6,507 6,572 6,638 6,705 6,772 6,839 6,908 To tal Water Ope ratin g Rev enues $113,516 $60,920 $61,984 $63,067 $64,171 $65,295 $66,440 $67,606 $68,794 $70,004 Prepa re d by Raftelis Page A - 25 12/14/2021 „„„„„„1 11 11 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: W_Cap_Fee Water Capacity Fee Calculation Description RCN To tal System Replacement Cost (1) $95,232,915 Less: Distribution System (2) ($31,707,945) Plus: NPV of Existing Borrowing Cost 0 Growth Related CIP FY 2020 - 2029 3,949,300 Plus: NPV of Future Borro wing Cost 1,931,438 To tal Cost for Capacity Fee Calculation $69,405,708 To tal Treatment Capacity (MGD) (3) 15 .34 Water System Unit Cost of Capacity (gpd) $4 .52 Residential Customer Peak Water Use (GPD) (4) 617 Value per 3/4" Equivalent Meter $2,793 Current Fee per 3/4" Equivalent Meter 690 Difference - $ $2,103 Difference - % 304 .84% (1) RCN is the water system inventory and replacement cost per unit per Nelson Engineering May 2020 . (2) Excludes 8 -inch and smaller collection system pipelines. (3) Per Nelson Engineering, 11.74 MGD (Current) and 3. 60 MGD (Future) capacity. (4) August 2018 Residential customer use per ERU. Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page B - 1 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Water Assets as of 6/30/2019 (From Nels on Engineering) Line No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4" DIP Water M ain 6" DIP Water Main 8" DIP Water Main 10" DIP Water Main 12" DIP Water M ain 14" DIP Water M ain 16" DIP Water Main 18" DIP Water Main 9 Fire Hydrant 10 Air Valve / PRV Vault 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Well #1 Well #2 Well #3 Well #5 Well #6 Well #7 Well #8 Item 18 Broadway Pump Station 19 Spruce Dr. Pump Station 20 Snow King Estates Pump Station 21 Snow King Estates Tank 22 Elk Refuge Tank 23 Virginian Tank Quantity Unit 10,969 Linear Foot 47,666 Linear Foot 115,398 Linear Foot 21,566 Linear Foot 100,104 Linear Foot 11,385 Linear Foot 3,045 Linear Foot 0 Linear Foot 385 Hydrant 11 Vault Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each FILE: SCHEDULE: JAWY_W W_RCNAssets Unit C ost Replacement Cost New $125.00 $1,371,125 150.00 7,149, 900 200 .93 23,186, 920 255 .07 5,500,900 310 .42 31,074,164 329 .67 3,753,288 385.02 1,172,372 454.80 0 10,251 .23 8,450.00 3,946,722 92,950 1,135,000 1,135, 000 1,135, 000 1,121,000 1,127, 000 1,127, 000 1,127, 000 446,107 334,580 356,886 540,000 3,900,000 4,500,000 24 To tal $95,232,915 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page B - 2 Water Capital Pro 'ects - CIP 2 Before Inflation Line No Town of Jacks on, WY Water a nd S ew er Fi na ncial Pl an and R at e St udy Water CIP & Debt Descripti on 1 N. King Stree t Water De sign 2 High School/South Park PRV Design 3 Well 97 4 Rancher Street Water Design 5 Well 99 Design 6 Fla t Cree k So uth Water Re pla cement D esign 6 7 N. King Street Water Construction 6 8 High School/South Park PRV Construction 6 9 Zone 3 Tank and Supply Study 3 10 Gregory Lane Water Replacement Design 6 11 Rancher Stree t Wa ter Co nstructio n 6 12 Well 99 Construction 2 13 Flat Creek South Water Replacement Construction 6 14 Vine Street Water Replacement Design 6 15 Snow King Avenue Water Replacement Design 6 16 Grego ry Lane Water Re placeme nt Co nstruction 6 17 W. Aspen Street Wate r Replacement Design 6 18 Spruce Drive Water Replacement Design 6 19 Zone 3 Tank Design 3 20 Pine Drive Wate r Re place me nt Design 6 21 V ine Stree t Water Replaceme nt Co nstruction 6 22 Snow King Avenue Water Replacement Construction 6 23 N. Millward Phase 1 Design 6 24 W. Aspen Street Wate r Replacement Construction 6 25 Spruce Drive Wa te r Re place me nt Co nstructio n 6 26 Zone 3 Tank Construction 3 27 Pine Drive Water Replacement Construction 6 28 East Broadway Water Replacement Design 6 29 N. Millward Phase 2 Design 6 30 N. Millward Pha se 1 Co nstruc tio n 6 31 5. Millward Water Replacement Design 6 32 Powerhorn Lane Water Replacement Design 6 33 Snow King Drive Water Line and Pump Station Design 6 34 N. Millward Phase 2 Construction 6 35 Ea st Bro adwa y Wate r Replacemen t Co ns tructio n 6 36 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 1 Water Replacemer 6 37 Broadway Hwy22 to Animal Hospital Water Replacem 6 38 S. Millward Water Replacement Construction 6 39 Powerhorn La ne Water Replacement Construction 6 40 Sno w Kin g Drive Water Line and Pump Sta tio n Co nstn 6 41 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 2 Water Replacemer 6 42 Crabtree Lane Water Replacement Design 6 43 Berger Lane Water Replacement Design 6 44 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 1 Water Replacemer 6 45 Bro adwa y Hwy 22 to Anima l Ho spital Wate r Replace m 6 46 Upper Cache Creek Drive Phase 2 Wate r Re place mer 6 47 Crabtree Lane Wate r Re place ment Co nstructio n 6 48 Berge r Lane Wate r Replaceme nt Co nstructio n 6 49 We ll Ho use SCADA Update 2 50 Hydrant Flow Test 6 51 Well House Flow M eter Replacement 2 52 Calibrate Hydraulic M odel 6 53 Virginian Lane Water Replacement Design 6 54 So uth G ro s Ven tre Wate r Repla ceme nt De sign 6 55 Virginian Lane Water Replacement Construction 6 56 South G ros Ventre Water Replacement Construction 6 57 Snow King Loop Water Replacement Design 6 58 Snow King Loop Wate r Replacement Construction 6 59 Sno w Kin g Loo p Wa ter Replace me nt De sign 6 60 Snow King Loop Wate r Replacement Construction 6 61 T otal Function 1 4 2 6 2 Gr owth N on - Growth Funding S ource 0% 100% C ash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Cash 0% 100 % C ash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Debt1 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 50 % 50 % Debt1 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100% C ash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100% C ash 50% 50 % Debt1 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% C ash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 2020 $11,900 9,700 75,000 2021 44,400 100 ,000 26,400 33,638 130,000 100,000 0% 100% Cash 5,000 222,600 0% 100% Cash 15,000 10,000 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Ca sh 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 50% 50% Cash 50% 50% Cash 50% 50% Ca sh 50% 50% Cash 2022 74,000 270,250 621,000 343,800 2023 270,250 621,000 23,000 40,800 480,950 2024 2025 2026 480,950 19,000 13,600 461,200 12,300 299,600 264,950 264,950 47,700 247 ,100 177,000 2.997,700 2,997,700 160,500 57,700 34 ,500 309,950 2027 309,950 32,800 54,000 65,500 224,150 375,050 2028 224,150 375,050 33,400 18,700 213,550 351,300 425,550 FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: W CIP DEBT RA NGE: Water Debt 2029 T otal $11,900 9,700 75,000 44,400 100,000 26,400 33,638 130,000 100,000 74,000 540,500 1,242,000 343,800 23,000 40,800 961,900 19,000 13,600 461,200 12,300 299,600 529,900 47,700 247,100 177,000 5,995,400 160,500 57,700 34,500 619,900 32,800 54,000 65,500 448,300 750,100 33,400 18,700 213,550 427,100 351,300 702,600 425,550 851,100 42,700 42,700 68,800 68,800 20,700 20,700 217,450 217,450 242,900 242,900 0 0 0 0 0 227,600 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $116,600 $667,038 $1,309,050 $1,436,000 51,551,600 $3,894,950 $3,399,850 $1,061,450 $1,641,700 $1,582,950 $19,932,438 Prvarcdbr Pull., Page B - 3 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate St1 SCHEDULE: Water - NPV of Interest Water Bond Issues Line No. Fiscal Year Original Principal Jackson, WY Model.xls Water_NPV_Future NPV of Growth Allocated NPV Interest Allocation of Interest 1 2020 0 0 0 2 2021 0 0 0 3 2022 1,375,453 582,315 X50„0t,% 291,157 4 2023 0 0 0 5 2024 4,494,363 1,759,207 50,.00% 879,604 6 2025 0 0 0 7 2026 4,204,429 1,521,354 50,.0 % 760,677 8 2027 0 0 0 9 2028 0 0 0 10 2029 0 0 0 11 Total $10,074,245 $3,862,876 $1,931,438 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page B - 4 Bond Amortization Schedule 2022 Borrowing Rate 4.00% Years 30 Annual Payment $79,543 Principal Amount 1 „375,453 Year of Issue 2022 EOY Fiscal Principal Year Balance Principal Interest Discount Rate 4.00% NPV of Interest Payments $582,315 Total 2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 2023 1,363,190 12,263 27,509 39,772 2024 1,338,175 25,015 54,528 79,543 2025 1,312,159 26,016 53,527 79,543 2026 1,285,102 27,057 52,486 79,543 2027 1,256,963 28,139 51,404 79,543 2028 1,227,699 29,264 50,279 79,543 2029 1,197,264 30,435 49,108 79,543 2030 1,165,612 31,652 47,891 79,543 2031 1,132,693 32,919 46,624 79,543 2032 1,098,458 34,235 45,308 79,543 2033 1,062,853 35,605 43,938 79,543 2034 1,025,824 37,029 42,514 79,543 2035 987,314 38,510 41,033 79,543 2036 947,264 40,050 39,493 79,543 2037 905,612 41,652 37,891 79,543 2038 862,293 43,319 36,224 79,543 2039 817,242 45,051 34,492 79,543 2040 770,389 46,853 32,690 79,543 2041 721,662 48,727 30,816 79,543 2042 670,985 50,677 28,866 79,543 2043 618,281 52,704 26,839 79,543 2044 563,469 54,812 24,731 79,543 2045 506,465 57,004 22,539 79,543 2046 447,181 59,284 20,259 79,543 2047 385,525 61,656 17,887 79,543 2048 321,403 64,122 15,421 79,543 2049 254,716 66,687 12,856 79,543 2050 185,362 69,354 10,189 79,543 2051 113,233 72,129 7,414 79,543 2052 38,219 75,014 4,529 79,543 2053 0 38,718 1,054 39,772 2054 2055 Total $1,375,951 $1,010,339 $2,386,290 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page B - 5 Bond Amortization Schedule 2024 Borrowing Rate 400% Discount Rate Years 30 4.00% Annual Payment $259,909 Principal Amount 4,494,363 NPV of Year of Issue 2024 Interest Payments $1,759,207 EOY Fiscal Principal Year Balance Principal Interest Total 2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 2025 4,454,296 40,067 89,888 129,955 2026 4,372,559 81,737 178,172 259,909 2027 4,287,552 85,007 174,902 259,909 2028 4,199,145 88,407 171,502 259,909 2029 4,107,202 91,943 167,966 259,909 2030 4,011,581 95,621 164,288 259,909 2031 3,912,135 99,446 160,463 259,909 2032 3,808,711 103,424 156,485 259,909 2033 3,701,150 107,561 152,348 259,909 2034 3,589,287 111,863 148,046 259,909 2035 3,472,949 116,338 143,571 259,909 2036 3,351,958 120,991 138,918 259,909 2037 3,226,127 125,831 134,078 259,909 2038 3,095,263 130,864 129,045 259,909 2039 2,959,165 136,098 123,811 259,909 2040 2,817,623 141,542 118,367 259,909 2041 2,670,419 147,204 112,705 259,909 2042 2,517,327 153,092 106,817 259,909 2043 2,358,111 159,216 100,693 259,909 2044 2,192,526 165,585 94,324 259,909 2045 2,020,318 172,208 87,701 259,909 2046 1,841,222 179,096 80,813 259,909 2047 1,654,962 186,260 73,649 259,909 2048 1,461,251 193,711 66,198 259,909 2049 1,259,792 201,459 58,450 259,909 2050 1,050,275 209,517 50,392 259,909 2051 832,377 217,898 42,011 259,909 2052 605,763 226,614 33,295 259,909 2053 370,085 235,678 24,231 259,909 2054 124,979 245,106 14,803 259,909 2055 0 126,511 3,444 129,955 Total $4,495,895 $3,301,376 $7,797,270 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page B - 6 Bond Amortization Schedule 2026 Borrowing Rate 4,00% Discount Rate Years 30 4.00% Annual Payment $243,143 Principal Amount 4,204,429 NPV of Year of Issue 2026 Interest Payments $1,521,354 EOY Fiscal Principal Year Balance Principal Interest Total 2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 2021 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 2025 0 0 0 0 2026 0 0 0 0 2027 4,166,946 37,483 84,089 121,572 2028 4,090,481 76,465 166,678 243,143 2029 4,010,957 79,524 163,619 243,143 2030 3,928,252 82,705 160,438 243,143 2031 3,842,239 86,013 157,130 243,143 2032 3,752,786 89,453 153,690 243,143 2033 3,659,754 93,032 150,111 243,143 2034 3,563,001 96,753 146,390 243,143 2035 3,462,378 100,623 142,520 243,143 2036 3,357,730 104,648 138,495 243,143 2037 3,248,896 108,834 134,309 243,143 2038 3,135,709 113,187 129,956 243,143 2039 3,017,994 117,715 125,428 243,143 2040 2,895,571 122,423 120,720 243,143 2041 2,768,251 127,320 115,823 243,143 2042 2,635,838 132,413 110,730 243,143 2043 2,498,129 137,709 105,434 243,143 2044 2,354,911 143,218 99,925 243,143 2045 2,205,964 148,947 94,196 243,143 2046 2,051,060 154,904 88,239 243,143 2047 1,889,959 161,101 82,042 243,143 2048 1,722,414 167,545 75,598 243,143 2049 1,548,168 174,246 68,897 243,143 2050 1,366,952 181,216 61,927 243,143 2051 1,178,487 188,465 54,678 243,143 2052 982,483 196,004 47,139 243,143 2053 778,639 203,844 39,299 243,143 2054 566,642 211,997 31,146 243,143 2055 346,165 220,477 22,666 243,143 2056 116,869 229,296 13,847 243,143 2057 0 119,234 2,338 121,572 2058 Total $4,206,794 $3,087,496 $7,294,290 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page B - 7 111111 1111 nuniol "'11"" 4") 4P" IIg4 II""' ,4 A „ 'u" 11 4 II Ih„, II!!! 11'4 II ''ti II 4 B 64, II II.!!! IINI D S II II . Ih", II' Pf II II !! !''. N 1 1, 4 A II'" A II I L.!''. II!''. s II 4.1110 ""�' Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: COS Test Year Cost of Service Water Fund R ANGE: COS_TYW Line No . Description FY 2022 Test Year Revenue Requirements Operation & Maintenance Expense 1 Current Operations $2,183,780 2 Total Operation & Maintenance Expense 2,183,780 Debt Service 3 Existing 107,749 4 Proposed 42,913 Capital 5 CIP 1,376,586 6 Total Capital Costs 1,527,247 7 Total Revenue Requirements 3,711,028 Wate r Fund Other Inflo ws / Outflows 8 Interest Income (129,943) 9 Capacity Fee Revenue (163,656) 10 M isc. Revenues (26,912) 11 3 Creek Capital Replacement Surcharge (35,072) 12 Adjustment for partial year rate increases 0 13 Net Bond Pro ceeds (1,375,453) 14 Total Water Fund Other Inflows / Outflo ws (1,731,036) 15 Increase (Decrease) in Reserves and Bond Proceeds 767,007 16 To tal A djustments (964,030) 17 Net Co st of Service $2,746,998 Pre pared by Raftelis Page C - 1 12/14/2021 Town of Ja ck son, WY FILE: J AWY W Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rat e Study SCHEDULE: COS Allocation of W at er System A ssets RANGE: C OS_PLTALLO_W Line No. Description (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (0) (9) Cust omer (10) Extra Capacity Local L ocal Maxim um Maxim um Distrib uti on Di strib ution Meters and Assets (1) CIP (2) T otal Base Day Hour Lines - Ex . 3 Creek Lines - 3 Creek Services Billing $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 Source of Supply / Wa ter Rights $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Water Productio n and Treatment 4,932,478 1,067,070 5,999,548 2,519,810 3,479,738 0 0 0 0 0 3 Treated Water Storage 4,481,549 33,638 4,515,187 1,128,797 1,580,315 1,806,075 0 0 0 0 Transmission and Distribution Lines (3) 4 Constructed Water Lines - Transmission 3,403,234 408,962 3,812,196 953,049 1,334,269 1,524,878 0 0 0 0 5 Constructed Water Lines - Distribution - Excl 3 Creek 5,233,928 573,478 5,807,406 0 0 0 5,807,406 0 0 0 6 Constructed Water Lines - Distribution - 3 Creek (4) 1,839,527 0 1,839,527 0 0 0 0 1,839,527 0 0 7 Total Trans miss ion and Distribu tion Lines 10,476,689 982,440 11,459,129 953,049 1,334,269 1,524,878 5,807,406 1,839,527 0 0 8 Subtota l of All Abov e 19,890,716 2,083,148 21,973,864 4,601,656 6,394,322 3,330,953 5,607,406 1,839,527 0 0 General Plant 9 M iscella neo us /Admin 2,511,033 21,600 2,532,633 530,371 736,988 383,914 669,342 212,018 0 0 10 Total Ge neral Plant 2,511,033 21,600 2,532,633 530,371 736,988 383,914 669,342 212,018 0 0 11 Total Water System A sse ts $22,401,749 $2,104,748 $24,506,497 $5,132,027 $7,131,310 $3,714,867 $6,476,748 $2,051,545 $0 $0 12 Percen t of Total 100.0% 20.9 % 29.1 % 15.2 % 26.4 % 8.4% 0.0% 0.0% 13 An nual Ca pital Cos ts $1,527,247 $319,828 $444,424 $231,511 $403,632 $127,852 $0 $0 Allocation of Function s to Se rvic e De man d Categories 14 Source of Supply / Wa ter Rights 100 .00% 100.00% 15 Water Production and Tre atment 100.00% 42.00 % 58.00% 16 Storage 100.00 % 25.00 % 35.00% 40.00 % Transmission and Dis tributio n Lines 17 Constructed Water Lines -Transmission 100.00% 25.00% 35.00% 40.00% 18 Constructed Water Lines - Distribution - Excl 3 Creek 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 19 Constructed Water Lines - Distribution - 3 Creek 100.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% 20 Total Transmissio n and Distribution Lines General Plant 21 M iscellaneous/Admin 100 .00 % 20.94 % 29.10 % 15.16 % 26.43 % (1) Existing water system assets original cost as of 6/30/19 by functional designation. (2) Cumu lative CIP by fu nc tiona l des igna tion con struc te d thro ugh the tes t yea r. (3) An estimate d 31. 4% of the inch -feet of water system line s are transmission, re maining 68. 6% are distributio n lines. (4) 3 Cree k asset costs are based on info rmation provide d to the To wn when the a ssets were installed. 100.00% 8.37% 0.00% 0.00 % Page C - 2 Prepare d by Raftelir 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and S ewer Finan ci al Pla n and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: COS O&M Allocatio ns to Fun cti on Costs RANGE: C OS O MFUNC W Line Water Customer So urce of Supply / Water Production and 3 Creek Meter s and Acco unting and No . Description T otal (1) Water Rights Treatment St orage Tr ansmissi on Town Distribution Distribution Services Billing Total Water 1 Water and Operations $1,001,096 $30,803 $184,818 $30,803 $157,865 $496,698 $100,110 $0 $0 $1,001,096 2 Well Operations 284,497 14,225 241,822 28,450 0 0 0 0 0 284,497 3 Billing and Acco unting 211,601 0 0 0 0 0 0 105,800 105,800 211,601 Trans fer 4 Indire ct Co st Allo cations - GF 686,587 20,649 195,650 27,172 72,394 227,777 45,908 48,518 48,518 686,587 5 Tota l O&M $2,183,780 $65,677 $622,290 $86,425 $230,259 $724,474 $146,018 $154,319 $154,319 $2,183,780 Allocation s to Functions (2) Water 6 Water and Operations (3) 7 Well Operations 8 Billing and Accounting Trans fer 9 Indirec t Cost Allocations - GF 100.0 % 3 .08% 18.46 % 3.08 % 15.77 % 100.0 % 5 .00% 85.00 % 10.00 % 0.00 % 100.0 % 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 100 .0% 3.01% 28 .50% 3.96% 10.54% (1) Te st year O &M ex pe nse s. (2) Allocations to funcationa l designations deve loped base d on discussions with Raftelis, N els on Engin eering, and Town staff. (3) Water and Ope rations O &M a llocated to functional designations ba sed on cost cent er employee time to op erations and m aintenan ce p er discussions with Town staff 49.62 % 10 .00% 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 .00% 50 .00% 50.00 % 33 .18% 6.69% 7.07 % 7.07% Prepare d by Raftelis Page C - 3 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: COS FTE Allocatio ns for W ater and Operations P ersonnel (1) RANGE: COS_FTE ALLOC_W Cust omer Line Source of Water Production Treated Water 3 Creek S ervice No. Emplo ye e FTE s Supply and Treatment St or age Transmis si on Distributi on Distributio n and Billi ng Admin Total 1 Water Utility Manager 1.00 5% 30 % 5% 10% 40% 10% 0% 0% 100 % 2 Street Op. /Utility Locator 0.50 0% 0% 0% 25% 65% 10% 0% 0% 100 % 3 Sr. Water Utility 1.00 5% 30% 5% 10% 40% 10% 0% 0% 100% 4 Utility Locator 0.25 0% 0% 0% 25 % 65 % 10 % 0% 0% 100% 5 Street/Utility Operato r 0.50 0% 0% 0% 25% 65% 10% 0% 0% 100 % 6 Total - FTEs by Function 3.25 0.10 0.60 0 .10 0.51 1.61 0.33 0.00 0.00 3.25 7 Tota l - FTEs - % by Function 3 .08% 18 .46% 3 .08% 15 .77% 49 .62% 10 .00% 0.00% 0 .00% 100.00% (1) Allocations to funcational de signa tions dev eloped b as ed on discussi ons with R aftelis, N elson Engin eering, and T own staff . Page C - 4 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate St udy Allocation of O&M Exp ense Water Utility Lin e No. Description 1 Source of Supply / Water Rights 2 Water Pro duction and Treatment 3 Storage 4 Transmission 5 Town Distribution 6 3 Cre ek Distributio n 7 Meters and Services 8 Customer Accounting and Billing (1) (2) Total Base $ $ FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: COS RANGE: COS_O MALLO_W (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Cust omer Extra Capacity L ocal L ocal Billing / Maximum Maximum Distribution Distributi on Meters and C ustomer Day Hour Lines Lines 3 Creek Services Service $ $ $ $ $ $ 100 .00% 100 .00% 0 .00 % 0 .00 % 0 .00 % 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00% 100.00% 42.00% 58.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00 % 0 .00 % 0.00 % 100 .00% 25 .00% 35 .00% 40 .00% 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 .00 % 100.00% 25.00% 35.00% 40.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 100 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 100 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 .00 % 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 100 .00 % 0.00 % 100.00 % 0.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 100.00 % 9 Sourc e of Supply / Water Rights $65,677 $65,677 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Water Production and Treatment 622,290 261,362 360,928 0 0 0 0 0 11 Sto rage 86,425 21,606 30,249 34,570 0 0 0 0 12 Transmission 230,259 57,565 80,591 92,104 0 0 0 0 13 Town Distribution 724,474 0 0 0 724,474 0 0 0 14 3 Creek Distribution 146,018 0 0 0 0 146,018 0 0 15 Meters an d Se rvices 154,319 0 0 0 0 0 154,319 0 16 Customer Accounting and Billing 154,319 0 0 0 0 0 0 154,319 17 To tal O peration and Maintenanc e Expense $2,183,780 $406,209 $471,767 $126,674 $724,474 $146,018 $154,319 $154,319 18 Percent of Tota l Total O&M Exc luding A dminis tration 19 Amoun t 20 Percent 100.0% 18.60% 21 .60% 5.80% 33 .18 % 6.69 % 7.07% 7.07% $2,183,780 $406,209 $471,767 $126,674 $724,474 $146,018 $154,319 $154,319 100.00% 18.60% 21.60% 5.80% 33.18% 6 .69% 7 .07% 7.07% Prepared by Raftelis Page C - 5 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and S ewer Fin anci al Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: COS Allocation of Adjustments to Revenue Requirements RANGE: COS_REVADJ_W Water Utility (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Cu stom er Lin e No. Description Local Local Billing/ Ma ximum Maxim um Distrib uti on Distribution Meters and Cust omer Total Base Day Hour Lines Lines 3 Creek Services Service 1 Interest Income ($129,943) ($24,171) ($28,072) ($7,538) ($43,109) ($8,689) ($9,183) ($9,183) 2 Ca pacity Fee Reven ue (163,656) (34,272) (47,623) (24,808) (43,252) (13,700) 0 0 3 Misc. Revenues (26,912) (5,006) (5,814) (1,561) (8,928) (1,799) (1,902) (1,902) 4 3 Creek Capita l Replac ement Surcharge (35,072) 0 0 0 0 (35,072) 0 0 5 Adjustment for partial year rate increases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Net Bond Proceeds (1,375,453) (343,863) (481,409) (550,181) 0 0 0 0 7 Increase (Decrease) in Reserves and Bond Proceeds 767,007 191,752 268,452 306,803 0 0 0 0 8 Total ($964,030) ($215,561) ($294,465) ($277,285) ($95,289) ($59,260) ($11,084) ($11,084) 9 Total - Weighted Ave rage 22 .36 % 30 .55% 28 .76% 9 .88 % 6.15% 1.15% 1 .15% 10 Inte rest Income 11 Capacity Fee Revenue 12 Misc. Re venues 13 3 Creek Capital Replacement Surcharge 14 Adjustment for partia l year ra te increa ses 15 Net Bond Proceeds 16 Incre ase (Decrease) in Re serves a nd Bond Proce eds O&M Weighted Avg. Capital Weighted Avg. O&M Weighted Avg. 3 Creek Only Capital Weighted Avg. Storage Tank Storage Tank 18 .60% 21 .60% 5 .80% 33 .18% 6.69 % 7.07 % 7 .07 % 20.94% 29.10% 15.16% 26.43% 8 .37% 0 .00 % 0.00% 18 .60% 21 .60% 5 .80% 33 .18% 6.69 % 7.07 % 7 .07% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100 .00% 0 .00 % 0.00 % 20 .94% 29 .10% 15 .16% 26 .43% 8.37% 0.00 % 0 .00 % 25.00% 35.00% 40.00% 0.00% 0 .00 % 0 .00 % 0.00 % 25 .00% 35 .00% 40 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0 .00 % Page C - 6 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Extra Capacity Town of Ja ck son, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rat e Study Estimated Unit s of S ervic e Water Utility Line No . Customer Class (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) FILE: J AWY W SCHEDULE: COS RANGE: COS SERVUNITS W (8) (9) (10) (11) Wat er Us e Ann ual 1,000 gallons 1 Residential 285,342 2 Commercial 364,688 3 Multi Family 94,323 4 Outside Town 44 5 3 Creek Ranch 51,049 6 G ov ernment 21,698 7 Schools 4,507 8 Irrigation -only 74,589 9 Teton Schoo l 1,897 Average Day gpd Demand Factor Maxim um D ay Dem and T otal Dem and gpd E xtra D em and gpd 782 272% 2,126 1,345 999 182 % 1,818 819 258 203% 525 266 0 150 % 0 0 140 315% 441 301 59 236 % 140 81 12 147% 18 6 204 401 % 820 615 5 356 % 19 13 Demand F actor Maxim um Hour Dem and Total Demand gpd E xtra Eq . Meters Eq . Meters Demand ( Meter Cap .) Bills (Met er C ost) gpd 453% 3,541 1,415 3,103 33,900 2,946 303 % 3,027 1,209 1,522 9,792 1,051 338% 874 349 561 2,316 294 250 % 0 0 11 36 5 525% 734 294 741 2,400 283 393 % 234 93 282 888 130 245% 30 12 99 300 52 668 % 1,365 546 295 1,140 148 593 % 31 12 17 12 7 10 Total Sys tem 898,137 2,461 240 % 5,907 3,446 400 % 9,837 3,930 6,632 50,784 4,916 Prepare d by Raftelis Page C - 7 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: COS Development of Unit C ost s of Service RANGE: COS_ULTUNITS_W Water Utility Lin e No. D escripti on (1) (2) T otal Ba se $ $ (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Cu stom er Extra Capacity Ma xim um Maxim um Day Hour $ $ Local L ocal Billing/ Distrib uti on Distribution Meters and Cust omer Li nes Lines 3 Cr eek S ervi ces Servic e $ $ $ $ Revenue Requirements - $ 1 Sourc e of Supply / Water Rights $65,677 $65,677 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Water Productio n and Treatment 622,290 261,362 360,928 0 0 0 0 0 3 Storage 86,425 21,606 30,249 34,570 0 0 0 0 4 Transmission 230,259 57,565 80,591 92,104 0 0 0 0 5 Town Distribution 724,474 0 0 0 724,474 0 0 0 6 3 Cree k Distribution 146,018 0 0 0 0 146,018 0 0 7 Me te rs and Serv ice s 154,319 0 0 0 0 0 154,319 0 8 Customer Accounting and Billing 154,319 0 0 0 0 0 0 154,319 9 Ope rating Co sts 2,183,780 406,209 471,767 126,674 724,474 146,018 154,319 154,319 10 Sourc e of Supply / Water Rights 11 Water Production and Treatment 12 Treated Wate r Sto ra ge 13 Constructe d Wate r Lines - Transmission 14 Constructed Water Lines - Distribution - Excl 3 Creek 15 Co nstructed Wate r Lines - Distribution - 3 Creek 16 Miscellaneous / Admin 17 Ca pital Co sts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 373,892 157,035 216,858 0 0 0 0 0 281,387 70,347 98,485 112,555 0 0 0 0 237,576 59,394 83,152 95,031 0 0 0 0 361,918 0 0 0 361,918 0 0 0 114,640 0 0 0 0 114,640 0 0 157,834 33,053 45,929 23,926 41,713 13,213 0 0 1,527,247 319,828 444,424 231,511 403,632 127,852 0 0 18 Source of Supply / Water Rights 65,677 65,677 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Water Produ ction and Tre atme nt 996,182 418,396 577,786 0 0 0 0 0 20 Storage 367,812 91,953 128,734 147,125 0 0 0 0 21 Transmission 467,836 116,959 163,743 187,134 0 0 0 0 22 Town Distributio n 1,086,393 0 0 0 1,086,393 0 0 0 23 3 Creek Distribution 260,658 0 0 0 0 260,658 0 0 24 Miscella neo us/Admin 157,834 33,053 45,929 23,926 41,713 13,213 0 0 25 Meters and Services 154,319 0 0 0 0 0 154,319 0 26 Cus tomer Accountin g and Billing 154,319 0 0 0 0 0 0 154,319 27 Total Rev enue Re qu ire ments 3,711,028 726,038 916,191 358,185 1,128,106 273,871 154,319 154,319 28 Adju stment to Cost of Serv ice (964,030) (215,561) (294,465) (277,285) (95,289) (59,260) (11,084) (11,084) 29 Net Cost of Se rvic e $2,746,998 $510,477 $621,726 $80,899 $1,032,817 $214,610 $143,234 $143,234 30 Units of Service 898,137 3,446 3,930 5,891 741 4,916 50,784 31 Unit Cost of Serv ice $0. 568 $180 .417 $20 .585 $175 .332 $289.632 $29.135 $2 .820 Prepared by Raftelis Page C - 8 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: COS Distribution of Co sts to Customer Clas ses Water Utility RANGE: COS_CUST_ALLOC_W Lin e No. Customer Class (1) (2) Total Base (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Cust omer Extra Capacity Maximum Maximum Day Hour L ocal L ocal Billing/ Distribution Distributi on Meters and C ustomer Lines Lines - 3 Creek Services Service 1 Unit Costs of Service - $/unit $0 .568 $180 .417 $20 .585 $175 .332 $289.632 $29.135 $2 .820 Residential 2 Units 285,342 1,345 1,415 3,103 0 2,946 33,900 3 Cost of Service - $ $1,159,457 $162,181 $242,596 $29,128 $544,115 $0 $85,824 $95,614 Commercial 4 Units 364,688 819 1,209 1,522 0 1,051 9,792 5 Cost of Service - $ $705,073 $207,279 $147,807 $24,887 $266,855 $0 $30,626 $27,618 Multi Family 6 Units 94,323 266 349 561 0 294 2,316 7 Cost of Service - $ $222,276 $53,611 $48,024 $7,182 $98,361 $0 $8,566 $6,532 Outside Town 8 Units 44 0 0 11 0 5 36 9 Cost of Service - $ $2,217 $25 $14 $2 $1,929 $0 $146 $102 3 Creek Ranch 10 Units 51,049 301 294 0 741 283 2,400 11 Cost of Service - $ $318,950 $29,015 $54,259 $6,046 $0 $214,610 $8,252 $6,769 Government 12 Units 21,698 81 93 282 0 130 888 13 Cost of Service - $ $84,576 $12,333 $14,587 $1,921 $49,444 $0 $3,788 $2,505 Schoo ls 14 Units 4,507 6 12 99 0 52 300 15 Cost of Serv ice - $ $23,639 $2,562 $1,056 $249 $17,416 $0 $1,510 $846 Irrigation -only 16 Units 74,589 615 546 295 0 148 1,140 17 Cost of Serv ice - $ $223,913 $42,394 $110,983 $11,231 $51,774 $0 $4,316 $3,215 Teton School 18 Units 1,897 13 12 17 0 7 12 19 Cost of Service - $ $6,897 $1,078 $2,400 $253 $2,923 $0 $209 $34 20 To tal - $ $2,746,998 $510,477 $621,726 $80,899 $1,032,817 $214,610 $143,234 $143,234 Prepared by Raftelis Page C - 9 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY W Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: COS Co st of Ser vice C omparison RANGE: COS_COMPCOS_W (1) (2) (3) Line No . Customer Class 2022 Test Year 2022 Indicated Cost of Re venue at Revenue Service E xisting Rates Increase To wn 1 Residential 2 Commercial 3 Multi Family 4 Schools 5 Irrigation -only 6 Subtotal 7 Outside Town 8 3 Creek 9 Subtotal 10 Total $1,159,457 789,649 222,276 23,639 223,913 $863,851 34% 973,904 -19% 236,280 -6% 11,187 111% 158,129 42% 2,418,934 9,114 318,950 2,243,351 8% 11,502 -21% 271,012 18% 328,064 282,514 16% $2,746,998 $2,525,865 9% Prepared by Raftelis Page C - 10 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_W Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: C OS Potable System Line Feet By Diameter Size RANGE: COS_LINE SIZEW Town Pipe Length, 3 Creek Pipe Length, T otal Pipe Length, Dia meter (Inc hes) Fe et (1) F eet (2) Feet Tow n In ch -Feet 3 Cr eek I nch -Fe et T otal Inch -F eet P er cent 0.75 321 321 241 0 241 0.01% 1. 00 2,406 2,406 2,406 0 2,406 0.08 % 1. 25 120 120 150 0 150 0.01% 1. 50 62 62 94 0 94 0.00% 2. 00 5,254 5,254 10,508 0 10,508 0.37 % 2.50 647 647 1,617 0 1,617 0 .06 % 3. 00 339 339 1,016 0 1,016 0.04% 4.00 21,439 191 21,630 85,757 764 86,521 3.01% 6.00 75,378 2,688 78,066 452,267 16,128 468,395 16 .31 % 8. 00 129,123 17,079 146,202 1,032,985 136,632 1,169,617 40.72% 10.00 14,394 3,767 18,161 143,944 37,670 181,614 6.32 % 12. 00 51,356 10,634 61,990 616,270 127,608 743,878 25.90 % 14. 00 11,453 11,453 160,343 0 160,343 5.58% 15. 00 0 0 0 0 0.00% 16. 00 2,870 2,870 45,925 0 45,925 1.60 % 18.00 0 0 0 0 0 .00% 20. 00 0 0 0 0 0.00% 24.00 0 0 0 0 0.00 % 36. 00 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total 315,163 34,359 349,522 2,553,520 318,802 2,872,322 100.00% Accounts / EQRs 3,936 199 4,135 5,907 448 6,355 Foot per Account 80. 1 172. 7 84.5 432 .3 711 .4 451 .9 3 Creek to Town 2. 2 1 .6 Distributio n - Excl 3 Creek Less Than 10" 1,587,039 55 .3 % Distributio n - 3 Creek Less Than 10" 153,524 5 .3 % Transmissio n 10" and Greater 1,131,759 39 .4 % 2,872,322 100 .0% (1) Wate r pipe line inve ntory da ta as of Dece mbe r 2019, pro vided by Ne lson Enginee ring. (2) 3 Creek water pipeline inventory data provided by Town staff. Prepared by Raftelis PageC-11 12/14/2021 Town of Ja ck son, WY Water and Sewer Fin anci al Pl an and R ate St udy Mo nthly Demand By Cla ss FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: C OS RANGE: COS DEMAND 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 FY 2018 Custo mer Clas s July August S ept emb er O ctober N ovember D ecemb er J anu ary Febr uary M arch April M ay Ju ne Tot al Residential 46,601 48,137 37,141 13,580 11,272 11,187 11,648 12,367 10,547 10.121 17.942 33,124 263,667 Comme rcial 46,985 47,491 40,884 23,628 21,498 29,388 21,593 22,274 19,320 16,748 25,153 40,171 355 .133 M u6 Family 16,405 18,240 14,557 6,320 6,459 5,541 5,462 5,655 5 ,122 5.036 7.509 11,469 107,775 Ou tside Town 112 116 97 79 68 60 75 78 68 79 103 122 1.057 3 Creek Ranch 10,578 11,622 7,868 926 326 519 495 484 313 414 3,306 10,409 47,260 G ov ernment 3,972 3,922 3,163 2,081 1,988 1,234 1,122 1,058 885 1,012 1,645 2,108 24,190 Schools 563 548 474 270 257 290 253 368 313 249 469 434 4,488 Irrigation -only 20,484 20,632 13,290 727 14 10 10 20 D 123 5,811 13,943 75.064 T eton School 168 161 316 235 84 35 57 107 128 112 152 134 1,690 To tal Po table 145,868 150,869 117,790 47,846 41,966 48,264 40,715 42,411 30,096 33,894 62,090 111,914 880,324 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 FY 2019 Custo mer Clas s July A ugust S ept ember O ct ober N ov ember D ecemb er Ja nuary Febr uary M ar ch April May Ju ne Total Residential 49,378 56,594 37,819 17,179 10,841 11,300 13,319 11,122 11,504 10,825 12.298 27,346 269.525 Commercial 46,064 49,900 39,084 25,045 21,096 21,036 33,726 18,708 19,599 16,945 20,788 34,777 346.768 M ulti Family 14,335 15,601 10,207 6,280 5,037 4,580 5,345 4,510 4,679 5.019 5,182 8,660 89 .435 Outside Town 113 123 102 86 72 68 88 67 67 66 81 111 1,044 3 Creek Ranch 9,427 10,265 8,137 2,265 314 366 558 551 791 488 1,784 6,828 41.774 Gov ernment 3,718 4,226 2,856 1,434 994 1,024 1,225 963 984 1,104 1,260 1,910 21 .698 Schools 454 486 470 253 215 276 312 286 297 273 474 505 4.301 Irrigation -only 19,952 23,389 15,890 3,463 15 30 10 0 0 100 2,320 9,420 74.589 Teton School 195 527 287 255 147 51 104 97 91 85 132 131 2,103 Total Potable 143,636 161,111 114,852 56,260 38,731 38,731 54,687 36,304 38,012 34,905 44,319 69,668 851,237 Av erage Av erage Av erage Average A verage Average Average A verage Average A verage Average Average Customer Class July August September Oct ober No vember December Ja nuary February March April May Ju ne T otal Residen tial 47,990 52,366 37, 480 15,380 11,057 11,244 12,484 11,745 11,026 10473 15,120 30,235 266,596 Commercial 46, 525 48,696 39, 984 24,337 21,297 25,212 27 ,660 20 ,491 19,460 16.847 22.971 37,474 350,951 Multi Family 15, 370 16,921 12, 382 6,300 5,748 5,061 5,404 5,083 4,901 5.028 6.346 10,065 98,605 Outside Town 113 120 100 83 70 64 82 73 68 73 92 117 1,051 3 Creek Ranch 10, 578 11,622 7, 868 926 326 519 495 484 313 414 3,306 10,409 47,260 Government 3, 845 4.074 3, 010 1,756 1,491 1,129 1,174 1.011 935 1,058 1,453 2,009 22,944 Schools 509 517 472 262 236 283 283 327 305 261 472 470 4,395 Irrigation -only 20, 218 22,011 14, 590 2,095 15 20 10 10 0 112 4,066 11,682 74,827 Teton School 182 344 301 245 116 43 81 102 110 99 142 132 1,897 Total 145,328 156,668 Custo mer Clas s Residential Commercial M ulti Family Outside Town 3 Creek R anch Gov ernment Schools Irrigation -only Teton School 116,186 51,384 40,355 43,574 47,670 39,324 37,115 34,363 53,966 102,591 868,524 Adj ustment to Adj ustment to Achieve Sy st em Rec og nize Adju sted System A verage Max Month (No n- Average Mo nth Peak Month / Peak Day Adjusted Peak Di versity of Class Peak Adjusted Peak Adjusted Peak Ann ual Use (kga l) Class A ve ra ge Day Mon th Deman d Co inc ide ntal) Us e Average M onth P eak D ay U se Dema nd Day Us e Demands D ay Fa ct or s D ay Use Pe ak H our F act or H our Us e 266,596 730 72,377 56,594 22,216 2.55 1,861 1.07 1,995 1.00 2.72 1,987 187 3.312 350,951 962 72,377 49,900 29,246 1.71 1,641 1.07 1,759 1.00 1.82 1,750 1.67 2,917 98,605 270 72,377 15,601 8,217 1 .90 513 1.07 550 1 .00 2 .03 548 1 .67 914 1,051 3 72,377 123 88 1.41 4 1.07 4 1.00 1.50 4 1.67 7 47,260 129 72,377 11,622 3,938 2.95 382 1.07 410 1 .00 3 .15 408 1 .67 680 22,944 63 72,377 4,226 1,912 2.21 139 1.07 149 1.00 2.36 148 1.67 247 4,395 12 72,377 505 366 1. 38 17 1 .07 18 1 .00 1 .47 18 1 .67 30 74,827 205 72,377 23,359 6,236 3.75 769 1.07 524 1.00 4.01 822 1.67 1,370 1,897 5 72,377 527 158 3. 33 17 1.07 19 1 .00 3 .56 18 1 .67 31 Total 868,524 2,380 162,487 72,377 2.25 5,342 1.07 5,727 1 .00 2.40 5,704 1.67 9,508 Page C - 12 Prepared 5: Raftells 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sew er Fi nancial Pl an and Rate St udy System Demand Fact ors FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: JAWY_W COS COS_PE AKING Input System Dema nd I nformatio n System Coincidental Dema nds (1) 1. Enter coincident system demand factors into the HIGHLIGHTED cells below. System demand factors are used f or alloc ating particular ass ets and O&M expenses associated with base, max day, and/ or ma x hour demands . Maximum day to average day demand Maximum hour to average day de mand N on - coincidental Div ersificatio n facto r Demand Max . Day to Average Day Max. Hour to Average Day (a ) Must be greater than 1. 0. Actual System Desig n (1) 2.16 2.40 3 .61 4.00 Coincidental Demand Diversi- ficati on Fa ct or (a) 2.40 2.16 4.00 3 .61 Fact or All ocati on Max Day E xtra Capacity Base 1.00 42 .00°/ Max Day 1 .40 58.00% 2.40 100.00 % Ma x H our E xtra Capacity Base 1.00 25 .00% Max Day 1 .40 35.00% Max H our 1.60 40.00% FY 2018 & FY 2019 C ust omer Data by Class (2) 4.00 100 .00% Max Day Max H our Ma x Month Avg Month System Max System Ma x System Max To To Consumption Consumptio n Day Hour Month Avg. Day A va. Da v Custome r Class Residential 56,594 22,216 173,705 289,508 156,668 Commercial 49,900 29,246 173,705 289,508 156,668 Multi Family 15,601 8,217 173,705 289,508 156,668 Outside Town 123 88 173,705 289,508 156,668 3 Creek Ranch 11,622 3,938 173,705 289,508 156,668 Government 4,226 1,912 173,705 289,508 156,668 Schools 505 366 173,705 289,508 156,668 Irrigation -only 23,389 6,236 173,705 289,508 156,668 Teto n School 527 158 173,705 289,508 156,668 2.82 1 .89 2.11 1.56 3 .27 2.45 1 .53 4.16 3.70 4.71 3.15 3 .51 2.60 5.45 4 .08 2.55 6 .93 6.16 (1) Source : 10% above actual pe ak mon th to average month. Maximum ho ur to av erage day of 4.0 times is based on criteria for similar c ommuniti es. R eviewed with Nels on Engi neering f or reso nable ness. (2) Source: Customer billing informatio n provide d by Town staff. Pre pared by Raftelis Page C - 13 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Water System Asset Summary Assets as of 6/30/2019 Function Code 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 11 Functional Category Land Water Production and Treatment Treated Water Storage Miscellaneous / Admin Distribution & Transmission Vehicles 3 Creek Only Meters FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: Asset Count 0 37 16 26 100 10 1 9 J AWY_WW Assets ASSET SUM Original Cost $0 4,932,478 4,481,549 984,016 8,637,162 336,876 1,839,527 1,190,141 Total 199 $22,401,749 Prepared by Raftelis Page C - 14 12/14/2021 T own of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Water Assets as of 6/30/2019 (Fr om T own) A quisitin Useful Life Depreci at5 in e no. Fu nction O es er ption Function I3escr tio n Date Year {Years) (i/. M etho4 O al Pre vio us GLerent' at'erl . st Qepre ctation. Uepresiatian an eoolt Yalu: 1 Water Production and Treatment 2 Water Production and Treatment 3 Water Production and Treatment 4 Water Production and Treatment 5 Misce lla neo us / Admin 6 Miscellane ous / Admin 7 Wa ter Pro duc tio n a nd Tre atme nt 8 Miscellane ous / Admin 9 Miscellane ous / Admin 10 Miscellaneous / Admin 11 Miscellaneous / Admin 12 M iscellane ous / Admin 13 Miscellaneous / Admin 14 Miscellane ous / Admin 15 Misce llaneo us / Admin 16 Meters 17 Miscellane ous / Admin 18 Miscellaneous / Admin 19 Miscellane ous / Admin 20 Miscellaneous / Admin 21 Miscellane ous / Admin 22 Treated Water Sto rage 23 Miscellane ous / Admin 24 Water Production and Treatment 25 Treated Water Storage 26 Meters 27 Meters 28 Water Production and Treatment 29 Meters 30 Treated Water Sto rage 31 Miscellane ous / Admin 32 Vehicles 33 Wate r Production and Treatment 34 Distribution & Transmission 35 Wate r Production and Treatment 36 Vehicles 37 Water Pro ductio n and Tre atme nt 38 Distribution & Transmission 39 Me ters 40 Miscellaneous / Admin 41 Wate r Production and Treatment 42 Distribution & Transmission 43 Vehicles 44 Vehicles 45 Vehicles 46 Water Production and Treatment 47 Wate r Production and Treatment 48 Miscellaneous / Admin 49 Distribution & Transmission 50 Water Production and Treatment 51 Treated Water Storage 52 Distribution & Transmission 53 Distribution & Transmission 54 Distribution & Transmission 55 Distribution & Transmission 56 Water Production and Treatment 2 PU MP HOUSE 2 PU MPHOUSE #2 ADDITION-BLDING 2 WELLHOUSE#5-BLDING/ELECTRIC 2 WELLS-REROOF WELL (1,2,3) 4 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG EXPANSION 4 PW BLDG EXPANSION (1/3) 2 WELL HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 4 PUBLIC WORKS EXPANSION (33 %) 4 RESERVOIR ROOF 4 EQUIPMENT STORAGE CANOPY(33 %) 4 STORAGE-PW-2ND FLOOR (33 %) 4 EQUIPMENT STORAGE CANOPY 4 GIS AERIAL PHOTO (50 %) 4 MAP INFO SOFTWARE (50 %) 4 CASELLE FINANICAL SOFTWARE 10 WATER METERING -RADIO 50% 4 SOFTWARE - FLEET MANAGEMENT 4 Software- Civil 30 4 EQ UIPMENT 4 GENERATORS 4 MISC. WATER EQ UIPM ENT 3 LEVEL CONTROL (2 MIL TANK) 4 RADIO TELEM ENTRY SYSTEM 2 CHLORINE ALARMS 3 WATER CLEANING WATER TANK 10 WATER TELEPHONE AMR PILOT 10 PHONE AM R PILOT 2 PUMP HOUSE HEATERS 10 DIFFERENTIAL FLOW METERS 3 SECURITY SYSTEM WATER TANKS 4 PORTABLE GENERATOR 7 TRAILER-WALTON SKID STEER(. 125 2 THAW WELL 6 ISOLATION VALVEES 2 CHLORINE REGULATORS & EJECTOR 7 2002 CAT LOADER (33%) 2 HYDROCONSTANT BOOSTER PUMPS 6 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES 10 ELECTRONIC WATER METERING BOX 4 BACKUP GENERATOR(33%) 2 PUMPS 6 FOUR POST LIFT SYSTEM (25%0 7 LOADER REPLACEMENT TIRES 7 Caterpillar -2014 7 420F2 4XG Caterpillar 2 WELL #5 ELECTRICAL UPGRADES 2 WATER SYSTEM WELL 1 & 2 4 MECHANICAL & EQUIPMENT 6 WATER SYSTEM -PIPELINE 2 WATER SYSTEM -PUMP CENTER 3 2.0 MG CONCRETE TANK 6 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT 6 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT 6 JACKSON STREET IMPROV-SCH 1 6 JACKSON STREET IMPROV-SCH II 2 PUMPHOUSE #2 ADD -GENERATOR 06/30/1965 06/30/1983 06/30/1985 06/30/1998 12/31/1999 10/01/2001 03/31/2001 01/01/2002 08/23/2002 05/01/2003 09/01/2002 01/05/2004 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 07/01/1999 10/01/2001 05/22/2003 09/18/2007 06/30/1990 06/30/1990 06/30/1995 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/2000 09/01/2000 12/01/2000 10/02/2000 05/31/2001 02/27/2001 02/22/2002 09/25/2001 10/09/2001 08/31/2002 03/31/2003 11/02/2002 08/11/2003 07/13/2004 02/25/2015 01/16/2018 04/30/2018 06/30/1965 06/30/1981 06/30/1975 06/30/1975 06/30/1979 06/30/1980 06/30/1982 06/30/1982 06/30/1982 06/30/1983 1965 1983 1985 1998 1999 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2002 2004 1999 1999 1999 2001 2003 2007 1990 1990 1995 1997 1997 1997 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 2002 2001 2001 2002 2003 2002 2003 2004 2015 2018 2018 1965 1981 1975 1975 1979 1980 1982 1982 1982 1983 33 Straight line 30 Straight line 28 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 15 Straight line 3 Straight lin e 5 Straight lin e 20 Straight line 8 Straight line 5 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 30 Straight line 7 Straight line 30 Straight line 15 Straight line 7 Straight line 10 Straight line 15 Straight line 15 Straight line 10 Straight line 8 Straight line 15 Straight lin e 15 Straight line 20 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 10 Straight line 8 Straight line 4 Straight line 8 Straight line 15 Straight line 10 Straight line 30 Straight line 20 Straight line 50 Straight line 20 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 20 Straight line $31,000 $31,000 $0 $31,000 16,780 16,238 542 16,780 32,933 29,640 3,293 32,933 6,163 4,211 205 4,417 1,746 8,862 4,873 295 5,168 3,694 49,544 27,658 1,651 29,310 20,234 67,813 38,997 2,260 41,257 26,555 184,043 101,198 6,135 107,333 76,710 21,575 11,402 719 12,121 9,454 4,735 2,394 158 2,552 2,183 19,579 10,331 653 10,984 8,595 11,543 5,582 388 5,970 5,573 5,662 5,662 0 5,662 0 6,250 6,250 0 6,250 0 6,330 6,330 0 6,330 0 58,760 49,205 2,938 52,143 6 ,616 3,847 3,847 0 3,847 0 8,441 8,441 0 8,441 0 11,764 11,764 0 11,764 0 682 682 0 682 0 5,420 5,420 0 5,420 0 7,500 7,500 0 7,500 0 11,662 11,662 0 11,662 0 3,356 3,356 0 3,356 0 9,450 9,450 0 9,450 0 27,500 27,500 0 27,500 0 7,500 4,875 250 5,125 2,375 3,972 3,972 0 3,972 0 17,695 11,502 590 12,092 5,603 13,290 13,290 0 13,290 0 700 700 0 700 0 700 700 0 700 0 389,386 389,386 0 389,386 0 22,768 22,768 0 22,768 0 7,468 7,468 0 7,468 0 47,333 47,333 0 47,333 0 11,978 11,978 0 11,978 0 6,820 6,820 0 6,820 0 128,336 101,596 6,417 108,013 20,323 18,418 9,364 614 9,977 8,440 8,072 8,072 0 8,072 0 7,728 7,728 0 7,728 0 3,099 3,098 0 3,099 0 77,776 32,522 9,722 42,244 35,532 63,433 1,923 4,229 6,152 57,281 109,471 1,860 10,947 12,807 96,664 29,261 22,815 6,446 29,261 0 16,398 16,398 0 16,398 0 255,773 255,773 0 255,773 0 70,500 70,500 0 70,500 0 585,265 517,163 11,705 528,868 56,397 55,200 55,200 0 55,200 0 179,116 136,405 3,582 139,987 39,129 115,293 83,308 2,306 85,814 29,479 40,612 29,422 812 30,234 10,378 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 0 $o 0 0 Page C - 15 T own of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Water Assets as of 6/30/2019 (Fr om T own) Asq'isition Usefullate Depreci ation Pre vio us C urrent' i a'tex1 in e no. kunction U es r pti on Fui rq [T escr tio n Date Year {Years] (3/. M ethod ' Or al :Cost : epre ctation Uepreriatian an eoak Vale 57 Distribution 8, Transmission 6 PU MP SAGE ADDITION 58 Treated Water Storage 3 WATER TANI< I MPROVE MENTS 59 Distribution & Transmission 6 PIPELINE 60 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 WELLHOUSE05-PIPELINE/WELL 61 Treated Water Sto rage 3 WATER TANI( I MPROVE MENTS 62 Distribution & Transmission 6 WATER LINES 63 Meters 10 WATER METERS 64 Distribution & Transmission 6 WATER LINES 65 Meters 10 WATER METERS 66 Distribution & Transmission 6 WATER LINES 67 Meters 10 WATER METERS 68 Meters 10 WATER METERS 69 Distribution & Transmission 6 WEST BROADWAY WATER PROJECT 70 Distribution & Tran smission 6 WATER LINES 71 Distribution & Transmission 6 GILL WATER ADDITION PROJECT 72 Distribution & Transmission 6 EAST JACKSON IMPROVEMENTS 73 Distribution & Transmission 6 CACHE CREEK WATER PROJECT 74 Distribution & Transmission 6 MISC. WATER PROJECT 75 Distribution & Transmission 6 WEST BROADWAY WATER PROJECT 76 Water Production and Treatment 2 WELL MONITORS 77 Distribution & Transmission 6 SNOW KING PUM P STATION 78 Distribution & Transmission 6 CACHE CREEK WATER LINE 79 Miscellane ous / Admin 4 GIS-PUBLIC WORKS 80 Distribution & Transmission 6 SNOW KING PUMP STATION 81 Distribution & Transmission 6 SNOW KING PUM P STATION 82 Distribution & Transmission 6 CACHE CREEK WATER LINE 83 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 WATER WELL EXPORATION 84 Distribution & Transmission 6 MISC. WATER PROJECTS 85 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 THAW WELLS 86 Distribution & Transmission 6 GLENWOOD/HANSEN/SIMPSON 87 Distribution & Transmission 6 CACHE CREEK WATER LINE 88 Miscellaneous / Admin 4 GEOGRAPHICAL INFO SYSTEM 89 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER PROJECTS 90 Distribution & Transmission 6 FIRE HYDRANT PROGRAM 91 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 THAW WELLS 92 Distribution & Transmission 6 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH 93 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 MUNICIPAL WATER WELL 06 94 Miscellaneous / Admin 4 GEOGRAPHICAL INFO SYSTEM 95 Distribution & Tra nsmission 6 ANNUAL WATER PRO JECTS 96 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER PROJECTS 97 Wa ter Pro ductio n a nd Trea tme nt 2 RIDGE ADDITION WELL 98 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER 99 Wa ter Pro ductio n a nd Tre atme nt 2 WATER WELL 06 100 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL FIRE HYDRANT 101 Wa ter Pro duc tio n a nd Tre atme nt 2 THAW WELL PROJECT 102 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL FIRE HYDRANT 103 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER 104 Distribution & Transmission 6 RIDGE PROJECT 105 Distribution & Transmission 6 VALVE REPLACEMENT 106 Miscellaneous / Admin 4 PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROL 107 Wa ter Pro duc tio n a nd Tre atme nt 2 THAW WELL 108 Distribution & Transmission 6 SOUTH PARK WATER MAIN (1/2) 109 Distribution & Transmission 6 MAIN REPLACEMENT - HILLSIDE 110 Water Production and Treatment 2 WELL 55 REDUNDANT M AIN 111 Distribution & Transmission 6 KELLY AVENUE REALIGNMENT (1/2) 112 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS 113 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL FIRE HYDRANT IMPROVEME 06/30/1983 06/30/1983 06/30/1983 06/30/1985 06/30/1987 06/30/1987 06/30/1988 06/30/1988 06/30/1989 06/30/1989 06/30/1989 06/30/1989 06/30/1990 06/30/1990 06/30/1990 06/30/1991 06/30/1991 06/30/1991 06/30/1991 06/30/1991 06/30/1991 06/30/1993 06/30/1993 06/30/1993 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1996 06/30/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 05/10/2000 09/28/1999 01/12/2000 06/07/2000 06/30/2000 06/28/2000 06/30/2000 01/31/2001 01/31/2001 1983 1983 1983 1985 1987 1987 1988 1988 1989 1989 1989 1989 1990 1990 1990 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1991 1993 1993 1993 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1996 1996 1997 1997 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999 2000 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2001 2001 20 Straight line 33 Straight lin e 50 Straight line 50 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 50 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 50 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 50 Straight lin e 50 Straight line 50 Straight lin e 50 Straight line 30 Straight lin e SO Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 15 Straight line 5 Straight line 32 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 5,157 59,648 54,755 112,708 59,435 9,590 719,269 291,623 173,251 536,016 22,535 35,295 184,386 20,675 46,040 2,225 7,776 38,620 31,927 5,850 11,605 1,753 56,961 100,857 5,623 349,234 53,357 8,695 3,318 50,000 7,403 6,867 27,602 7,908 2,785 10,556 73,182 4,830 4,948 20,519 5,874 8,840 1,817,634 1,187 1,274 4,869 35,650 43,901 2,387 5,978 389,483 20,260 19,844 14,082 2,141 35,071 11,046 5,157 57,360 38,096 45,315 52,600 5,268 636,528 155,029 148,133 274,974 11,563 20,119 81,311 15,195 20,301 1,953 6,829 20,352 16,827 5,139 10,194 1,569 51,075 85,561 4,594 285,208 43,573 7,102 2,707 39,167 5,800 5,379 21,621 6,195 2,182 8,270 57,326 3,622 3,711 14,705 4,210 6,041 1,241,735 811 828 3,165 23,172 28,536 2,387 5,978 224,771 7,320 7,145 5,072 1,204 20,357 6,412 O 5,157 2,288 59,648 1,095 39,191 2,029 47,344 65,364 6,835 59,435 173 5,440 4,150 10,814 647,342 71,927 5,249 160,278 131,345 5,198 153,331 19,920 9,648 284,623 251,393 406 11,968 10,567 706 20,825 14,470 3,319 84,630 99,756 620 15,816 4,859 829 21,129 24,911 74 2,027 198 259 7,088 688 772 21,124 17 ,496 639 17,466 14,461 195 5,334 516 387 10,581 1,024 58 1,628 125 1,899 52,974 3,987 3,362 88,923 11,934 187 4,782 841 11,641 296,850 52,384 1,779 45,351 8,006 290 7,392 1,303 111 2,818 500 1,667 40,833 9,167 247 6,046 1,357 229 5,608 1,259 920 22,541 5,061 264 6,459 1,449 93 2,275 510 352 8,621 1,935 2,439 59,765 13,417 161 3,783 1,047 165 3,876 1,072 684 15,389 5,130 196 4,406 1,468 295 6,335 2,505 60,588 1,302,323 515,311 40 850 337 42 870 404 162 3,327 1,542 1,188 24,361 11,289 1,463 29,999 13,902 O 2,387 0 O 5,978 0 12,171 236,942 152,541 405 7,725 12,535 397 7,542 12,302 282 5,353 8,728 71 1,276 865 1,169 21,526 13,545 368 6,780 4,266 0 0 15,564 0 Page C - 16 T own of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Water Assets as of 6/30/2019 (Fr om T own) AAH4isitin Usefullate Depreci ation Pre vio us C urrent' i a'tex1 in e no. Function U eserr b ony Fui rq [T escr du nDate Year {Years] (ij. M ethod ' Or al :Cost J epre eiatian Uepreriation an eook Vale 114 Distribution & Transmission 6 EAST JACKSON RECONSTRUCTION 115 Distribution & Transmission 6 GROS VENTRE DRIVE INTERSECTIO 116 Distribution & Transmission 6 PEARL AVE RECONSTRUCTION 117 Distribution & Transmission 6 KELLY AVE REALIGH - PHASE I 118 Distribution & Transmission 6 REPAIRS/ MAINTENACE WATER LEAI( 119 Distribution & Transmission 6 REPAIRS/ MAINTE FIRE HYDRANTS 120 Distribution & Transmission 6 EAST JACKSON RECONSTRUCTION 121 Distribution & Transmission 6 GROS VENTRE DR INTERSECTION 122 Water Production and Treatment 2 WELL HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 123 Distribution & Transmission 6 PEARL AVENUE PHASE I 124 Distribution & Transmission 6 KELLY AVENUE REALIGHNMENT 125 Treated Water Storage 3 RESERVIOR CLEANING/INSPECTION 126 Water Production and Treatment 2 WELL HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 127 Wate r Production an d Tre atmen t 2 WELLS 6,7,8 128 Distribution & Transmission 6 SPRUCE DRIVE PROJECT 129 Distribution & Transmission 6 HS ROAD WATER LINE RELOCATE 130 Distribution & Transmission 6 SPRUCE DRIVE PROJECTS 131 Distribution & Transmission 6 HS ROAD WATER MAIN EXTENSION 132 Distribution & Transmission 6 HS ROAD WATER LINE RELOCATE 133 Water Production and Treatment 2 WELL HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS 1,2,3 134 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 WELLS 6,7,8 135 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER IMPROVEMENTS 136 Wate r Production and Treatment 2 WELL 5 INTER & GENERATOR 137 Distribution & Transmission 6 E JACKSON RECONTR & DRAIN 50% 138 Distribution & Transmission 6 ANNUAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVE 139 Distribution & Transmission 6 NELSON DRIVE IM PROVEMENTS 140 Distribution & Transmission 6 NELSON DRIVE CONSTRUCTION 141 Distribution & Transmission 6 SIMPSON/HANSEN/GLENWOOD IMPR 142 Distribution & Transmission 6 GLENWOOD WATERLINE IM PROVEM 143 Distribution & Transmission 6 REDMOND WATERLINE IMPROVEME 144 Distribution & Transmission 6 PINE DRIVE IMPROVEM ENTS 145 Distribution & Transmission 6 TRAPPER INN WATER M AIN 146 Distribution & Transmission 6 Pine Drive Impro vements 147 Distribution & Transmission 6 Trapper Inn Water Main 148 Distribution & Transmission 6 ASPEN DRIVE/UPPER CACHE CREEK 149 Distribution & Transmission 6 CACHE CREEK DRIVE 150 Distribution & Transmission 6 WATERFILL STATION 151 Distribution & Transmission 6 WEST KELLY WATER LINE IMPROVE 152 Distribution & Tra nsmission 6 UPPER CA CHE CREEK 153 Distribution & Transmission 6 GILL ADDITION 154 Distribution & Tra nsmission 6 WATER FILL STATION -COMPLETION 155 Treated Water Storage 3 New Water Tanks 156 Distribution & Transmission 6 West Kelly Water Line 157 Distribution & Transmission 6 Kelly Karns Water Line 158 Distribution & Transmission 6 Pio neer Lane Water Line 159 Distribution & Transmission 6 PIONEER LANE WATER PROJECT 160 Tre ate d Wate r Storage 3 ELK REFUGE 3.3 M GALLON TANI( 161 Treated Water Storage 3 SNOW KING 180 GALLON TANI( 162 M isce lla neo us/A dmin 4 WATER PHOTOVO LTAIC SYSTEM 163 Distribution & Transmission 6 HALL STREET WATERMAIN 164 Distribution & Transmission 6 REMOND STREET WATERMAIN 165 Miscellaneous / Admin 4 WATER PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM 166 Tre ate d Wate r Storage 3 SNOW KING 180K GALLON TANI( 167 Treated Water Storage 3 ELK REFUGE 3.3M GALLON TANI( 168 Distribution & Transmission 6 HALL STREET WATERMAIN 169 Distribution & Transmission 6 REDMOND STREET WATERMAIN 170 Distribution & Transmission 6 Hall Street Watermain Improv e 03/31/2001 04/30/2001 01/31/2001 01/31/2001 01/01/2002 01/01/2002 07/31/2001 12/04/2001 01/01/2002 06/30/2002 08/15/2001 10/31/2001 01/01/2002 03/31/2002 06/30/2002 06/30/2002 09/19/2002 02/12/2003 12/11/2002 12/31/2002 03/31/2003 12/31/2002 12/31/2002 09/10/2003 09/01/2003 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 06/01/2007 11/02/2006 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 06/30/2008 09/30/2007 09/30/2007 03/31/2008 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 12/31/2009 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 12/31/2009 06/30/2010 10/30/2010 06/30/2011 06/30/2011 06/30/2011 06/30/2011 01/01/2012 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2002 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2002 2002 2003 2002 2002 2003 2003 2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2006 2007 2007 2007 2008 2007 2007 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 15 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 15 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight lin e 50 Straight line 15 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 14,967 8,607 499 9,106 11,258 6,444 375 6,819 369,743 214,620 12,325 226,945 177,455 99,829 5,915 105,744 22,942 12,615 765 13,380 8,718 4,794 291 5,084 619 349 21 370 164,280 90,752 5,476 96,228 128,344 70,572 4,278 74,850 6,850 3,654 228 3,882 249,470 140,341 8,316 148,657 3,750 3,750 0 3,750 99,287 54,594 3,310 57,904 41,383 58,536 31,711 1,951 33,662 24,874 65 35 2 37 28 33,803 18,032 1,127 19,158 14,645 50,940 16,078 1,019 17,096 33,844 12,075 6,191 403 6,593 5 ,482 2,909 1,508 97 1,605 1,304 25,461 13,154 849 14,003 11 ,459 66,501 33,810 2,217 36,026 30,475 64,553 33,349 2,152 35,501 29,052 349,757 180,692 11,659 192,351 157,407 373,475 110,593 7,469 118,063 255,412 494,163 146,575 9,883 156,458 337,705 106,025 28,618 2,121 30,739 75,286 82,490 37,109 2,750 39,859 42,631 104,610 47,060 3,487 50,547 54,063 163,245 67,996 5,442 73,438 89,807 144,644 60,248 4,821 65,070 79,574 283,312 62,329 5,666 67,995 215,317 19,422 8,090 647 8,737 10,685 234,955 51,690 4,699 56,389 178,566 22,747 8,841 758 9,599 13,147 41,033 8,825 821 9,646 31,388 1,601 344 32 376 1,225 45,792 35,095 3,053 38,148 7,645 754,724 143,336 15,094 158,430 596,294 191,151 41,111 3,823 44,934 146,218 35,276 7,587 706 8,292 26,983 3,042 2,079 203 2,282 760 9,650 1,984 322 2,305 7,345 358,067 68,003 7,161 75,165 282,903 114,159 21,681 2,283 23,964 90,195 44,181 7,510 884 8,393 35,788 254,715 43,295 5,094 48,389 206,326 11,930 2,186 398 2,583 9,347 33,496 6,886 1,117 8,002 25,493 108,975 16,713 2,180 18,893 90,082 103,420 17,579 2,068 19,647 83,773 801 187 27 214 587 40,340 6,187 807 6,994 33,346 92,530 19,022 3,084 22,106 70,424 1,485,190 272,081 49,506 321,588 1,163,603 6,350 1,163 212 1,375 4,975 32,312 6,642 1,077 7,719 24,593 98,659 21,372 3,289 24,660 73,999 5,861 4,440 142,799 71,711 9,562 3,634 249 68,052 53,494 2,968 100,813 0 Page C - 17 T own of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Water Assets as of 6/30/2019 (Fr om T own) in e,ne. Fu nction D esert}+ti oni 0 D escription Ai uisitb D as Yea useful Life Depreci ate Ye: us C urrent' ( afed hod ' Or al Cost DeKea atian.. Depteeietian ion eoak Valu 171 Distribution & Transmission 172 Treated Water Storage 173 Treated Water Storage 174 Distribution & Transmission 175 Distribution & Transmission 176 Treated Water Storage 177 Distribution & Transmission 178 Treated Water Storage 179 Distribution & Transmission 180 Distribution & Transmission 181 Water Production and Treatment 182 Wate r Production and Treatment 183 Distribution & Transmission 184 Distribution & Tran smission 185 Distribution & Transmission 186 Wa ter Pro duc tio n a nd Tre atme nt 187 Distribution & Transmission 188 Distribution & Transmission 189 Miscellane ous / Admin 190 Distribution & Transmission 191 Wate r Production and Treatment 192 Water Production and Treatment 193 Distribution & Transmission 194 Vehicles 195 Vehicles 196 Vehicles 197 Vehicles 198 Vehicles 199 6 Redmond Street Watermain Impr 3 Snow King 180K Gall ow Tank 3 Elk Refuge 3.3M Gallong Tank 6 Cache Creek Drive Watermains 6 EAST SI MPSON E HANSON WATER 3 CAPITALIZE INTEREST -3 .3 M TANI< 6 REMOND STREET WATERMAIN 3 ELK REFUGE 3.3 M GALLON TANI< 6 CACHE CREEK DRIVE 6 E. SIMPSON/E HALL WATERMAIN 2 CAPITALIZE INTEREST ON WELL 2 Budge Drive Pump equipm ent 6 New Main/Pump House Budge 6 Waterline -pathways 6 Uppe r Cache Creek Drive Water 2 WEST BROADWAY PUMPHOUSE 6 HILLSIDE WATERLINE - WISTER 6 Highway 22 (Westview Townhomes) 4 WWTP SHARED SOLAR PANELS 6 1110 LF BUDGE-HWY 22 WATERLINE 2 WELL 95 PROPERTY 2 EASEMENTS WELL#6 6 Pump Station Land 7 Chevy Silverado Truck 7 CHEVY SILVERADO 2012 7 Chevy 2500 White Truck 7 2016 GMC SIERRA PICKUP 7 2017 WHITE CHEVY SILVERADO To tal 01/01/2012 01/01/2012 06/30/2012 01/01/2012 01/01/2012 06/30/2012 01/01/2013 01/01/2013 01/01/2013 01/01/2013 07/30/2012 01/01/2015 01/01/2015 10/30/2014 06/01/2015 11/16/2016 07/01/2016 06/30/2018 04/26/2019 11/30/2018 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/2015 01/30/2008 11/23/2011 10/18/2011 05/13/2016 02/24/2017 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2012 2015 2015 2014 2015 2016 2016 2018 2019 2018 1995 1995 2015 2008 2011 2011 2016 2017 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight lin e 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 20 Straight line 30 Straight line 0 None 0 None 0 None 10 Straight line 8 Straight line 8 Straight line 8 Straight line 12 Straight line 362,415 635,800 1,426,826 158,176 25,360 25,778 1,080 22,011 6,033 610,549 13,400 140,000 9,642 100,000 594,341 635,490 159,753 190,561 364,610 239,355 32,000 86,000 10,404 33,571 24,803 6,963 37,371 41,827 78,507 137,728 261,389 28,977 4,646 4,722 198 4,032 1,105 111,850 2,645 16,314 1,124 12,228 61,062 34,324 10,650 0 0 0 0 0 0 33,571 20,479 5,835 9,970 4,698 12,081 21,193 47,561 5,273 845 859 36 734 201 20,352 447 4,667 321 3,333 19,811 21,183 5,325 6,352 3,296 4,656 0 0 0 0 3,100 870 4,671 3,486 90,587 158,921 308,950 34,250 5,491 5,582 234 4,766 1,306 132,202 3,091 20,981 1,445 15,562 80,874 55,507 15,975 6,352 3,296 4,656 0 0 0 33,571 23,580 6,706 14,641 8,184 271,828 476,879 1,117,876 123,926 19,868 20,197 846 17,245 4,727 478,347 10,309 119,019 8,197 84,438 513,467 579,984 143,778 184,209 361,314 234,699 32,000 86,000 10,404 0 1,223 258 22,730 33,643 $22,401,749 $9,483,039 $638,687 $10,121,726 $12,280,023 Page C - 18 11111111111111111 S„" 11 111111111111 Town of Jackson, WY Water a nd Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Residential FILE: J AWY_W SCHEDULE: Alt 1 RANGE: WRD1_RES Residential - Total Class Co st of Ser vice $1,159,457 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Total Accounts M onthly Charge 2,551 243 21 8 1 0 1 0 2,825 $11 .00 16 .29 28 .29 43 .15 85 .44 131 .10 256 .38 409 .06 Revenue $336,732 47,502 7,129 4,142 1,025 0 3,077 0 $399,607 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $759,850 Block M inimum Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block En ding Volume in Blo ck Cumulative V olume Factor Rate Reve nue $1 .24 2,000 20. 9% 59,656 0 .00 0 .00 $0 6,000 23. 2% 66,122 1 .00 1 .24 81,992 25,000 31. 6% 90,082 2 .00 2 .48 223,404 Ove r 25,000 24. 4% 69,599 3 .00 3 .72 258,909 100. 00% 285,460 1 .98 $564,305 ($195,545) Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 1 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water a nd Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Multi -Family Residential FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: J AWY_W Alt 1 WRD1_MFR Mu lti -Family - Total Class C ost of Servi ce $222,276 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Accounts 50 64 28 46 3 2 0 0 193 Monthly Charge $11 .00 16 .29 28 .29 43 .15 85 .44 131 .10 256 .38 409 .06 Revenue $6,600 12,511 9,505 23,819 3,076 3,146 0 0 $58,657 Remainde r Reco vered fro m Vo lu me Rate $163,618 Block Minimum Use Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Blo ck Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 9. 1% 90. 9% 100. 00% Cumulative Volume Factor 8,583 85,740 94,323 1 .00 Rate $2 .12 0 .00 2 .12 Re venue $0 181,768 $181,768 $18,150 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 2 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water a nd Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Commercial FILE: J AWY_W SCHEDULE: Alt 1 RANGE: WRD1_COM Commercial - Total Class C ost of Servi ce $789,649 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Accounts Monthly Charge 452 289 26 108 9 5 1 0 890 $11 .00 16 .29 28 .29 43 .15 85 .44 131 .10 256 .38 409 .06 Revenue $59,664 56,494 8,826 55,922 9,228 7,866 3,077 0 $201,077 Remainde r Reco vered fro m Vo lu me Rate $588,572 Block Minimum Use Above Minimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Blo ck Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 4. 1% 95. 9% Cumulative Volume Factor 15,901 371,917 100. 00% 387,818 1 .00 Rate Re venue $2 .12 0 .00 $0 2 .12 788,465 $788,465 $199,893 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 3 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water a nd Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Schools FILE: J AWY_W SCHEDULE: Alt 1 RANGE: WRD1_SCH Schools - Total Class C ost of Servic e $23,639 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Accounts Monthly Charge 8 $11 .00 5 16 .29 4 28 .29 2 43 .15 4 85 .44 2 131 .10 0 256 .38 0 409 .06 25 Revenue $1,056 977 1,358 1,036 4,101 3,146 0 0 $11,674 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $11,964 Block M inimum Use Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block En ding 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Blo ck Cumulative V olume Factor 1. 2% 77 98. 8% 6,327 1 .00 100. 00% 6,404 Rate $2 .12 0 .00 2 .12 Reve nue $0 13,414 $13,414 $1,449 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 4 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water a nd Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Irrigation -Only FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: J AWY_W Alt 1 WRD1_IRR Irrigation -Only - Tot al Cl ass C ost of Servi ce $223,913 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Accounts 16 30 24 22 3 0 0 0 95 Monthly Charge $11 .00 16 .29 28 .29 43 .15 85 .44 131 .10 256 .38 409 .06 Revenue $2,112 5,864 8,148 11,392 3,076 0 0 0 $30,591 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $193,322 Block M inimum Use Above Minimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block En ding 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Blo ck 2. 5% 97. 5% Cumulative V olume Factor 1,865 72,724 100. 00% 74,589 1 .00 Rate $2 .48 0 .00 2 .48 Reve nue $0 180,356 $180,356 ($12,966) Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 5 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water a nd Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Outside Town FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: J AWY_W Alt 1 WRD1_OS Outside Town - Total Class Cost of Ser vice $9,114 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Accounts Monthly Charge 1 $11 .00 0 16 .29 0 28 .29 2 43 .15 0 85 .44 0 131 .10 0 256 .38 0 409 .06 3 Revenue $132 0 0 1,036 0 0 0 $1,168 Remainde r Reco vered fro m Vo lu me Rate $7,946 Block Minimum Use Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Blo ck Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block Cumulative Volume Factor Rate $2 .48 3. 5% 2 - 0 .00 96. 5% 42 1 .00 2 .48 100. 00% 44 Re venue $0 105 $105 ($7,841) Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 6 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate St udy FY 2022 Water Rates 3 Creek FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Alt 1 RANGE: WRD1_3CR 3 Cree k - Total Class C ost of Servic e $318,950 Meter Size s 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Reside ntial N on -Residential Irrigatio n -O nly Tot al Mo nthly Charge (1) 12 39 56 1 0 0 0 0 108 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 3 69 13 1 0 0 0 0 86 17 109 70 3 0 0 0 0 199 $13 .66 20 .16 35 .18 53.76 106.50 163.52 320.09 510.76 Reve nue $2,787 26,369 29,551 1,935 0 0 0 0 $60,642 Remainder Recov ere d from V olume Ra te $258,308 Block Residential Minimum Tie r 2 Tie r 3 Tier 4 Block Ending Volume in Block Cumulative Volume Fact or Rate Revenue $2 .02 2,000 14.1% 1,402 0 .00 $0 6,000 17. 9% 1,779 1.00 2.02 3,594 25,000 29. 8% 2,962 2.00 4.04 11,968 Over 25,000 38.2% 3,797 3 .00 6 .06 23,012 100.0% 9,941 3 .88 $38,575 Commercial Minimum 2,000 8. 1% 72 0 .00 Tier 2 Over 2,000 91. 9% 814 1 .00 2 .02 $0 1,644 100.0% 886 1 .86 $1,644 Irrigatio n -Only Minimum 2,000 2. 2% 885 0 .00 $0 Tie r 2 25,000 21.7% 8,728 2.00 4.04 35,262 Tier 3 Over 25,000 76.1% 30,609 3.00 6.06 185,492 Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) 100.0% 40,222 5 .49 $220,754 (1) Town base rate adjusted for 3 Creek Inch -Feet water pipeline per ERU applied to Town base rate. $2,665 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 7 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study FY 2022 Water Rates Summary of Cost of Service vs. Adopted FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Alt 1 RANGE: WRD SUM 2022 Test Year FY - 2022 Line Cost of Revenue No . Cu stomer Class Service Under Ad opted Difference 1 Residential $1,159,457 $963,912 20% 2 Commercial 789,649 989,542 -20% 3 Multi Family 222,276 240,425 -8% 4 Outside Town 9,114 1,273 616% 5 3 Creek Ranch 318,950 321,616 -1% 6 Irrigation -only 223,913 210,948 6% 7 Schools 23,639 25,088 -6% 8 Total 2,746,998 2,752,803 0% Prepare d by Rafte lis Page D - 8 12/13/2021 :3 ::::) Hummum 1111 11111111111111111 1111 Town of Ja ckso n, WY FILE: JAWY_WW W ater a nd S ewer Fi nan ci al Pl an and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: C ASH FLOW Sewer R ANGE: CASHFL OW1 Total Wastewater Fund Cash Fl ow Line No. Descripti on Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 1 Re venue Adjustment 0.0% 0.0 5.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6 .0% 6.0% 6.0 % 2 Reve nues 3 Waste wa te r Service Revenues $2,449,979 $2,427,315 $2,561,873 $2,728,454 $2,905,352 $3,094,955 $3,297,010 $3,512,187 $3,741,300 $3,985,528 4 M isc. Revenues 66,870 4,361 4,427 4,494 4,562 4,631 4,701 4,773 4,846 4,920 5 Ca pa city Fee 432,404 238,920 236,053 252,486 255,245 267,862 286 ,117 289,438 298,121 318,230 6 Interest 94,792 143,156 126,454 121,885 125,085 108,159 106,719 101,773 90,673 99,445 7 Total Revenues 3,044,045 2,813,752 2,928,807 3,107,318 3,290,244 3,475,607 3,694,547 3,908,170 4,134,940 4,408,124 $2,561,873 4,427 236,053 126,454 8 Total Operating Expenditures 9 Net Revenue Available fo r Debt Service 10 Debt Service 11 Existing Bond Debt Se rvice 12 New Bond De bt Service 13 Total Debt Serv ice 2,041,192 2,066,342 2,161,511 2,261,195 2,365,611 2,474,989 2,589,569 2,709,602 2,835,354 2,967,101 2,928,807 2,161,511 1,002,853 747,410 767,296 846,123 924,632 1,000,618 1,104,978 1,198,568 1,299,586 1,441,023 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 767,296 0 0 0 14 Net Revenues Available after Debt Service 1,002,853 747,410 767,296 846,123 924,632 1,000,618 1,104,978 1,198,568 1,299,586 1,441,023 15 Cash or Grant Funded CIP 16 Debt Funded CIP 17 Total Capital Ex penditures 18 Ca pital Funding 19 Net Bo nd Procee ds (1) 20 Grants 21 Tota l Ca pita l Funding So urces 16,200 1,415,500 950,053 718,139 1,601,682 1,058,206 1,302,830 1,642,549 948,696 2,098,163 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,200 1,415,500 767,296 950,053 0 950,053 950,053 718,139 1,601,682 1,058,206 1,302,830 1,642,549 948,696 2,098,163 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Ne t Cash Flow 986,653 (668,090) (182,757) 127,985 (677,050) (57,587) (197,852) (443,981) 350,890 (657,140) 23 Total Wastewate r Fund BOY Cash Balance 4,739,605 5,726,258 5,058,169 4,875,411 5,003,396 4,326,346 4,268,758 4,070,906 3,626,925 3,977,815 24 End of Year Cash Ba lance 5,726,258 5,058,169 4,875,411 5,003,396 4,326,346 4,268,758 4,070,906 3,626,925 3,977,815 3,320,674 25 Unspent Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Cash Reserve - Target(2) 1,960,911 1,973,486 2,021,070 2,070,912 2,123,120 2,647,583 2,704,873 2,764,890 2,827,766 2,893,639 27 EOY Cash Balance -Unrestricted 3,765,347 3,084,683 2,854,341 2,932,484 2,203,225 1,621,175 1,366,033 862,035 1,150,049 427,035 (182,757) 5,058,169 4,875,411 0 2,021,070 2,854,341 28 Restricted Wastewater Funds EOY Cash Balance 29 EOY Cash Balance - Restricted and Unrestricted 30 Ca sh Reserve - Targe t (2) 31 DSC - Annual Debt Serv ice (3) 1,960,911 1,973,486 2,021,070 2,070,912 2,123,120 2,647,583 2,704,873 2,764,890 2,827,766 2,893,639 2,021,070 $5,726,258 $5,058,169 $4,875,411 $5,003,396 $4,326,346 $4,268,758 $4,070,906 $3,626,925 $3,977,815 $3,320,674 $4,875,411 $1,960,911 $1,973,486 $2,021,070 $2,070,912 $2,123,120 $2,647,583 $2,704,873 $2,764,890 $2,827,766 $2,893,639 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA (1) Net bond proceeds are bond proceeds less issuance expenses and debt service reserves included in the gross bond proceeds. (2) Target is at least 50% of O&M (or 180 days) plus 5 -year cash -funded capital average for FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029 . (3) Net Revenues Available for Debt Service targeted to be at least 1.30 times annual debt service. Page E - 1 P reparrd by Rafo' tO 12/14/2021 Town of Ja ckso n, WY FILE: JAWY_WW W ater a nd S ewer Fi nan ci al Pl an and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: C ASH FLOW Sewer R ANGE: CASHFL OW2 Operati ng Subfund C ash Flow Line No. Description Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 1 Operating Revenues 2 Wastewater Service Revenues $2,449,979 $2,427,315 $2,561,873 $2,728,454 $2,905,352 $3,094,955 $3,297,010 $3,512,187 $3,741,300 $3,985,528 3 M isc. Re ve nue s 66,870 4,361 4,427 4,494 4,562 4,631 4,701 4,773 4,846 4,920 4 Interest 94,792 119,649 102,946 98,377 101,577 84,651 71,467 66,520 55,421 64,193 5 Tota l O pe ra ting Reve nues 2,611,641 2,551,324 2,669,246 2,831,325 3,011,491 3,184,237 3,373,178 3,583,480 3,801,567 4,054,642 $2,561,873 4,427 102,946 6 Total Operating Expenditures 7 Net Revenues Available for Debt Service 2,041,192 2,066 ,342 2,161,511 2,261 ,195 2,365,611 2,474,989 2 ,589,569 2,709,602 2,835,354 2,967,101 2,669,246 2,161,511 570,449 484,982 507,735 570,129 645,880 709,248 783,609 873,878 8 Debt Service 9 Existing Bond De bt Se rvice 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 New Bo nd Debt Serv ice 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 966,213 1,087,540 0 0 0 0 507,735 0 0 0 0 11 Total Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Ne t Revenues Available after Debt Service 570,449 484,982 507,735 570,129 645,880 709,248 783,609 873,878 966,213 1,087,540 13 Tra nsfe r to Capital Impro ve ment Subfund 524,111 1 ,153 ,072 690,492 442,145 1,322,930 1,236,609 981,461 1,317 ,860 615,323 1,744,681 14 Net Cashflow 15 Beginning of Year Cash Balance 16 End of Year Cash Balance 17 Cash Reserves Target (1) 18 End of Year Cash - Unres tricte d 507,735 690,492 46,338 (668,090) 4,739,605 4,785,943 4,785,943 4,117,854 1,020, 596 1,033,171 (182.757) 127,985 4,117,854 3,935,096 3,935,096 4,063,081 1,080,756 1,130,598 (677,050) (527,361) (197 ,852) (443,981) 4,063,081 3,386,031 2,858,669 2,660,817 3,386,031 2,858,669 1,182,806 1,237,495 350,890 (657,140) 2,216,836 2,567,726 2,567,726 1,910,586 1,417,677 1,483,551 (182,757) 4,117, 854 3,935,096 1,080,756 2,660,817 2,216,836 1,294,784 1,354,801 $3,765,347 $3,084,683 $2,854,341 $2,932,484 $2,203,225 $1,621,175 $1,366,033 $862,035 $1,150,049 $427,035 $2,854,341 19 Cash Reserve-Target25% (1) 234% 199% 182% 180% 143 % 116% 1D3% 82 % 91% 64% 20 Cash Reserve - Requirement at 25% (1) $1,020,596 $1,033,171 $1,080,756 $1,130,598 $1,182,806 $1,237,495 $1,294,784 $1,354,801 $1,417,677 $1,483,551 21 DSC -Annual Debt Serv ice (2) N/A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/A N/A N/ A N/ A N/A (1) Target is at least 50% of O&M (o r 180 days). (2) Net Revenues Available for Debt Service targeted to be at least 1. 30 times annual debt service. Page E - 2 P reparrd by Rnfid is 12/14/2021 Town of Ja ckso n, WY W ater a nd S ewer Fi nan ci al Pl an and Rate St udy Sewer Projected Re venue s FILE: J AWY_WW SCHEDULE: CASH FL OW RANGE: CASHFL OW3 Line No. D escription Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 $1,477,705 $1,440,805 $1,458,846 $1,536,666 $1,634,128 $1,737,739 $1,848,992 $1,967,444 $2,093,443 $2,227,464 17,473 18,439 4,744 5,070 5,359 6,741 7,242 7,667 8,114 8,726 O 0 75,113 94,947 100,965 107,428 114,308 121,626 129,411 137,699 $1,495,178 $1,459,244 $1,538,703 $1,636,682 $1,740,452 $1,851,907 Test Year 2022 $1,458,846 4,744 75,113 $1,538,703 1 Vo lume Revenues (1) 2 Annual Growth Revenues 3 Rate Increa se Revenues 4 To tal Vo lume Rev enues Wastewater Bas e Charge Revenu e 5 Retail 6 A nnual Gro wth (A ccounts) 7 Rate Incre ase 8 Total Wastewate r Consumer Charge Revenues Wastewater Dump Fee R evenue 9 Dump Fe e Rev enue (1) 10 Annual Gro wth 11 Rate Increase 12 Total Dump Fee Revenues Was te wa te r Strength Su rcharge 13 Re ta il (1) 14 Total Wastewater User Charge Revenue 15 Annual Growth 16 Rate Increase 17 Total Wastewate r User Charge Rev enue Capacity Fee Rev enue 18 Capacity Fee Re venue (1) 19 Total Capacity Fee Re ven ue (1) FY 2020 revenues per Town staff. $1,970,542 $2,096,738 $2,230,968 $2,373,890 $621,701 $632,828 $644,209 $682,171 $729,292 $779,611 $833,449 $891,054 $952,570 $1,018,260 11,127 11,381 5,477 5,840 6,191 6,662 7,167 7,597 8,053 8,662 O 0 32,484 41,281 44,129 47,176 50,437 53,919 57,637 61,615 $632,828 $644,209 $662,171 $729,292 $779,611 $833,449 $891,054 $952,570 $1,018,260 $1,088,538 $644,209 5,477 32,484 $682,171 $11,381 $37,962 $47,121 $50,319 $53,838 $57,604 $61,516 $108,122 $109,957 $111,845 $118,382 $126,506 $135,157 $144,458 1,835 1,889 899 963 1,001 1,125 1,170 O 0 5,637 7,161 7,650 8,177 8,738 $109,957 $111,845 $118,382 $126,506 $154,366 1,264 9,338 $65,691 $70,278 $164,967 1,339 9,978 $176,285 1,420 10,662 $111,845 899 5,637 $118,382 $135,157 $144,458 $154,366 $164,967 $176,285 $188,367 $212,016 $212,016 $222,617 $235,974 $250,132 $265,140 $2,419,544 $2,395,606 $2,437,517 $2,573,192 $2,740,058 30,435 31,709 11,121 11,873 12,550 O 0 113,235 143,388 152,745 $2,449,979 $2,427,315 $2,561,873 $2,917,647 14,527 162,781 $281,049 $297,912 $3,107,949 15,579 173,482 $3,310,775 16,528 184,883 $315,786 $334,734 $3,526,766 17,507 197,026 $3,756,743 18,809 209,977 $222,617 $2,437,517 11,121 113,235 $2,561,873 $2 ,728,454 $2,905,352 $3,094,955 $3,297,010 $3,512,187 $3,741,300 $3,985 ,528 $432,404 $238,920 $432,404 $238,920 $236,053 $252,486 $255,245 $267,862 $286,117 $236,053 $252,486 $255,245 $267,862 $286,117 $289,438 $298,121 $318,230 $236,053 $236,053 $289,438 $298,121 $318,230 P repared by Rnfirl s Page E - 3 6/1/2022 Town of Ja ckso n, WY FILE: JAWY_WW W ater a nd S ewer Fi nan ci al Pl an and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: C ASH FLOW Sewer R ANGE: CASHFL OW4 Capital Improv ement Subf und C ash Flow Line No. Description Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 Cash So urces 1 Transfer from Operations Subfund 2 Capacity Fee 3 Interest Inco me 4 Tota l Ca sh So urces $524,111 $1,153,072 $690,492 $442,145 $1,322,930 $1,236,609 $981,461 $1,317,860 $615,323 $1,744,681 432,404 238,920 236,053 252,486 255,245 267,862 286,117 289,438 298,121 318,230 0 23,508 23,508 23,508 23,508 23,508 35,252 35,252 35,252 35,252 $690,492 236,053 23,508 956,515 1,415,500 950,053 718,139 1,601,682 1,527,980 1,302,830 1,642,549 948,696 2,098,163 5 Ca sh or Grant Funded CIP 16,200 1,415,500 950,053 718,139 1,601,682 1,058,206 1,302,830 1,642,549 948,696 2,098,163 6 Debt Funded CIP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total Capital Expenditures 16,200 1,415,500 950,053 718,139 1,601,682 1,058,206 1,302,830 1,642,549 948,696 2,098,163 950,053 950,053 0 950,053 8 Capital Funding 9 Net Bond Proceeds (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Total Capital Funding Source s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Net Cashflow 940,315 0 0 0 0 469,774 0 0 0 0 13 Beginning of Year Cash Balance 0 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 14 End of Year Cash Balanc e 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 15 Unspent Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 End of Year Cash Balance Less Unspent Bond Proceeds 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 17 Cash Reserves Requirement (2) 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 18 End of Year Cash - Unrestricted $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 940,315 940,315 0 940,315 940,315 $0 (1) Net bond proceeds are bond proceeds less issuance expenses and debt service reserves included in the gross bond proceeds. (2) Target is the 5 -year capacity average cash -funded capital for FY 2020 through FY 2024 and FY 2025 through FY 2029. Page E - 4 P reparrd by Rnfid is 12/14/2021 Town of Ja ckso n, WY FILE: JAWY_WW W ater a nd S ewer Fi nan ci al Pl an and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: C ASH FLOW Sewer R ANGE: C ASHFLOW Beginni ng of Year Cash Balance Calculatio n Line No. Description Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 Interest Calculation 1 Beginning of Year Cash Balance 2 Operations Subfund $4,739,605 $4,785,943 $4,117,854 $3,935,096 $4,063,081 $3,386,031 $2,858,669 $2,660,817 $2,216,836 $2,567,726 3 Ca pital Impro ve ment Subfund 0 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 940,315 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 1,410,089 4 Tota l 4,739,605 5,726,258 5,058,169 4,875,411 5,003,396 4,326,346 4,268,758 4,070,906 3,626,925 3,977,815 $4,117,854 940,315 5 Total Fund Interest Earnings 94,792 143,156 126,454 121,885 125,085 108,159 106,719 101,773 90,673 99,445 6 Allo cated Interest Earnings 7 Operations Subfund 8 Capital Improvement Subfund 9 Total Interest Earnings 94,792 119,649 0 23,508 102,946 98,377 101,577 84,651 23,508 23,508 23,508 23,508 71,467 66,520 55,421 64,193 35,252 35,252 35,252 35,252 5,058,169 126,454 102,946 23,508 94,792 143,156 126,454 121,885 125,085 108,159 106,719 101,773 90,673 99,445 10 Beginning of Y ear Cash Balance 11 O pera tions Subfund 100% 84 % 81% 81 % 81% 78% 67 % 65% 61% 65 % 12 Ca pital Impro ve me nt Subfund 0% 16 % 19% 19 % 19% 22% 33 % 35% 39% 35 % 13 Total 100 % 100 % 100% 100 % 100% 1000/0 100 % 100% 100% 100 % 126,454 81% 19% (1) Allocated based on Beginning of Year Cash Balance by subfund. Page E - 5 P reparrd by Rnfid is 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_WW Water and Wastewater Financial Plan SCHEDULE: O&M Base O&M By Expense Type Wastewater RANGE: WW OM 2020 Expense Type Expense Estimate Sewer Treatment Plant PER Salaries & Wages - Regular $250,000 PER Buyout- Compensated Absences 2,725 PER Overtime 3,165 PER FICA & Medicare 21,619 BEN Health Insurance 79,567 BEN Vision Insurance 1,081 BEN Dental Insurance 5,354 BEN Wyoming Retirement 36,271 BEN GASB 68 Pension 0 BEN Workers' Compensation 3,891 BEN State Unemployment 344 BEN Disability/Life Insurance 2,266 SUP General/Office Supplies 0 SUP OSHA Safety Supplies 0 SUP Uniforms 668 MAT Small Tools & Equipment <$10K 987 MAT Water/Sewer Supplies 6,695 MAT Postage 422 OPE Printing & Publication 3,877 OTH Dues & Subscriptions 584 UTL Utilities 125,421 UTL Phone Communications 0 SER Professional Services 250,000 MAT Repair & Maint - Vehicles 0 MAT Repair & Mai nt- Shop Parts 1,108 MAT Repair & Mai nt - Shop Labor 2,212 MAT Repair & Maint - Machinery 20,000 MAT Repairs & Maint-Flood Electric 0 MAT Petroleum Products 3,445 MAT Repar & Maint- Office 30 MAT Repar & Maint - Buildings 22,500 SER Dust Abatement 5,235 SER Trash Collection 7,371 OPE Uniform Cleaning 1,067 OTH Training, Travel, & Meetings 3,456 SER IT Services 35,273 SER Property Insurance 27,220 SER Liability Insurance 2,515 SER Equipment Rental 0 Operations and Maintenance PER Salaries & Wages - Regular 95,498 PER Buyout - Compensated Absences 1,002 PER Overtime 8,803 PER FICA & Medicare 7,917 BEN Health Insurance 32,046 BEN Vision Insurance 528 BEN Dental Insurance 1,542 BEN Wyoming Retirement 15,423 BEN Workers' Compensation 1,522 BEN State Unemployment 315 BEN Disability/Life Insurance 1,108 SUP Uniforms 349 MAT Small Tools & Equipment <$1OK 1,967 MAT Water/Sewer Supplies 6,029 SUP Sewer Saddles 72 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Parts 8,096 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Labor 2,621 MAT Repair & Maint - Machinery 19,169 MAT Petroleum Products 2,118 MAT Repair & Maint - System 65,000 OPE Uniform Cleaning 850 OTH Training, Travel, & Meetings 2,118 SER IT Services 28,010 SER Property Insurance 2,854 SER Liability Insurance 925 Billing and Accounting PER Salaries & Wages - Regular 54,375 PER Buyout- Compensated Absences 0 PER Overtime 2,024 PER FICA & Medicare 4,132 BEN Health Insurance 12,913 BEN Vision Insurance 115 BEN Dental Insurance 572 BEN Wyoming Retirement 8,548 BEN Workers' Compensation 616 BEN State Unemployment 146 BEN Disability/Life Insurance 533 SUP General/Office Supplies 1,483 MAT Water/Sewer Supplies 63,660 SER Banking Fees 5,066 SER Credit Card Fees 8,619 SER Utility Billing Services 9,878 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Parts 2,501 MAT Repair & Maint - Shop Labor 523 MAT Petroleum Products 303 OPE Uniform Cleaning 194 OTH Training, Travel, & Meetings 875 SER IT Services 5,015 SER Liability Insurance 488 Other IC Indirect Cost All ocation-GF 626,362 $2,041,192 Page E - 6 cared 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water Finan cial Plan and Rate Study Wastewater Fund Wa stewater O&M Descripti on FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Wa st ewater_OM R AN GE: Wastewater_ OM Estimated Pr ojected T est Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Materials $229,386 $240,855 $252,898 $265,543 $278,820 $292,761 $307,399 $322,769 $338,908 $355,853 Personnel 451,260 473,823 497,514 522,390 548,509 575,935 604,732 634,968 666,717 700,052 Benefits 204,701 214,936 225,683 236,967 248,815 261,256 274,319 288,035 302,437 317,558 Supplies 2,572 2,701 2,836 2,977 3,126 3,283 3,447 3,619 3,800 3,990 Operating 5,988 6,287 6,602 6,932 7,278 7,642 8,024 8,426 8,847 9,289 Utility 125,421 131,692 138,277 145,190 152,450 160,073 168,076 176,480 185,304 194,569 Other 7,033 7,244 7,461 7,685 7,916 8,153 8,398 8,650 8,909 9,176 Capital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Se rvices 388,469 400,123 412,127 424,491 437,225 450,342 463,852 477,768 492,101 506,864 Indirect Costs 626,362 588,680 618,114 649,020 681,471 715,544 751,322 788,888 828,332 869,749 To tal Wastewater $2,041,192 $2,066,342 $2,161,511 $2,261,195 $2,365,611 $2,474,989 $2,589,569 $2,709,602 $2,835,354 $2,967,101 2022 $252,898 497,514 225,683 2,836 6,602 138,277 7,461 0 412,127 618,114 Annual Escalation Rate Cumulative Escalation Rate $2,161,511 1.23% 1.23% 4.61 % 4 .61% 5.89 % 10 .78% 4.62 % 4.62% 15.89 % 21.25% 4.63 % 4.64 % 26.87% 32.75 % 4.64% 4 .65 % 38.91 % 45 .36 % Prepared by Ra f'ielia' Page E - 7 12/14/2021 Town of Jack son, WY Water and Sewer Fi na ncial Pla n and Rat e Study Wastewater CIP a nd Debt W W Capital Pro ecte-CIP 80941 FILE: SCHE DULE: RANGE: JAWY_W Wa st ewater - Debt Wast ewat er_CIP_Debt Bef ore Inflation 2020-2029 Funding Source Description Function Growth No n Growl' 1 SCADA Lift Stations 2 Save the Block Alley Sewer Design 3 Rancher Street Sewer Design 4 West Cache Creek Drive Sewer Design 5 SCA DA1S/WTP 6 SCADA Lift Stations 7 all Avenue and Alley Sewer Design 8 WWTP Wetland Upgrade 9 Save the Block Alley Sewer Construction 10 IT24 Loader Replacement 11 Gregory Lane Sewer Design 12 Rancher Street Sewer Construction 13 Flat Creek South Sewer Construction 14 GIII Avenue and Alley Sewer Construction 15 v ine Street Sewer Design 16 Hlllside Townhomes Sewer Design 17 Gregory Lane Sewer Construction 18 Snow King and Maple Way Sewer Design 19 v ine Street Sewer Construction 20 Hlllside Townhomes Sewer Construction 21 WWTP Backup Blower 22 Flat Creek North Sewe r Design 23 West K arns Se wer Design 24 Snow King and Maple Way Sewer C onstruction 25 East B roadway Sewer De sign 26 Halpin Sewer Design 27 Les Jones Alley Sewer Design 28 Flat Creek North Sewer Construction 29 West Karns Sewer Construction 30 Powderhorn Ln P hase 1 Sewer Design 31 Powderhorn Ln P hase 2 Sewer Design 32 East B roadway Sewer Construction 33 Halpin Sewer Constructon 34 Les Jones Alley Sewer Construction 35 Upper Cache Creek P hase 1 Sewer Design 36 Cottonwood/High School Road Sewer Design 37 Broadway Hwy 22 to Animal Sewer Design 38 Powderhorn Ln P hase 1 Sewer Construction 39 Powderhorn Ln P hase 2 Sewer Construction 40 Upper Cache Creek P hase 2 Sewer Design 41 Barron's Line Sewer Design 42 Wapiti and Absaroka Sewer Design 43 Upper Cache Creek P hase 1 Sewer Construction 44 Cottonwood/High School Road Sewer Constructor 45 Broadway Hwy 22 to Animal Sewer Construction 53 Sewer GIS Update 54 Sewer Model Update 55 Inflow Review 56 Rafter J Inflow Review 57 T otal 2020 0% 100 % Cash 6,000 0% 100 % Cash 10200 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100 % Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 0% 100% Cash 15,000 0% 100% Cash 15,000 0% 100% Cash 10,000 0% 100% Cash 10,000 2021 15,000 575,000 60,000 80,000 15,500 200 ,000 145 ,000 275,000 2022 86,400 129,800 336,600 335,100 2023 5,900 59,800 561,550 2024 2025 561,550 55,400 76,800 388,700 388,700 225,000 39,100 19,700 359,600 2026 359,800 12,100 20,500 26,100 254,100 256,300 2027 254,100 42,300 35,400 157,300 266,600 338,800 2028 31,100 35,700 19,100 275,050 229,850 2029 10 -Year Total $6,000 10,200 15,000 575,000 60,000 80,000 15,500 200,000 145,000 275,000 86,400 129,800 336,600 335,100 5,900 59,800 1,123,100 55,400 76,800 777,400 225,000 39,100 19,700 719,600 12,100 20,500 26,100 508,200 256,300 42,300 35,400 157,300 266,600 338,800 31,100 35,700 19,100 275,050 550,100 229,850 459,700 15,500 15,500 6,900 6,900 11,700 11,700 201,850 201,850 232,200 232,200 248,100 248,100 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 $16,200 $1,415,500 $887,900 $627,250 $1,307,450 $807,300 $928,900 $1,094,500 $590,800 $1,221,150 $8,896,950 Page E - 8 Prepa red by RFC 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and S ew er Fi na ncial Pl an a nd Rat e St udy Wastewater CIP a nd D ebt WW Capital Pro ects-CIP WW 1 After I nflatio n Descripti on SCADA Lift Sta tions Save the Block A lley Sewer Design Rancher Street Sewer Design West Cache Creek Drive Sewer Design SCADA WWTP SCADA Lift Sta tion s Gill Aven ue and Alley Sewer Design WWTP Wetland Upgrade Save the Block A lley Sewer Construction 1724 Loader Replacement Gre go ry Lane Se rve r De sign R ancher Street Sewer Construction Flat Creek South Sewer Con struction Gill Aven ue and Alley Sewer Con struction V ine Street Sewer Design Hillside Townho me s Se we r De sign Gregory Lane Sewer Construction Snow K ing and Maple Way Sewer D esign V ine Street Server Construction Hillside Townhomes Serv er Con struction WWTP Ba ckup Blo we r Flat Creek North Sewer Design West Karns Sewer Design Snow King and M aple Way Sewer Construction East Broadway Sewer Design Halpin Sewer De sign Les Jones Alley Sewer Design Flat Creek North Sewer Construction West Karns Sewer Construction Powderhorn Ln Phase 1 Sewer Design Powderhorn Ln Phase 2 Sewer Design East Broadway Sewer Construction Halpin Sewer Construction Les Jones Alley Sewer Construction Upper Cache Creek Phase 1 Server Design Cottonwood/High School Road Sewer Design Broadway Hwy 22 t0 A nimal Sewer D esign Powderhorn Ln Phase 1 Sewer Construction Powderhorn Ln Phase 2 Sewer Construction Upper Cache Creek Phase 2 Server Design Barron 's Line Sewe r Des ign Wapiti and Absaroka Sewer Design Upper Cache Creek Phase 1 Serv er Constru ction Cottonwood/High School Road Sewer Construction Broadway Hwy 22 to Animal Sewer Constru ction Sewer GIS Upda te Sewer Model Update Inflow Rev iew R after J Inflow Review Total CIP Fu ncti on Growth N on Growth 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100% 100% 100% 100 % 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100 100% Fu nding Source C ash Cash Cash Cash Cash C ash Cash Cash Cash Cash C ash Cash Cash Cash Cash C ash Cash Cash Cash Cash C ash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Ca sh Cash C ash Cash Cash Ca sh Cash Cash Cash 2020 2021 2022 2023 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 10,200 0 0 0 0 15,000 0 0 O 575,000 0 0 0 60,000 0 0 0 80,000 0 0 0 15,500 0 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 145,000 0 0 0 275,000 0 0 0 0 92,448 0 0 0 138,886 0 0 0 360,162 0 0 0 358,557 0 0 0 0 6,755 0 0 0 68,465 0 0 0 642,919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 15,000 0 0 O 15,000 0 0 O 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 2024 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 687,923 67,867 94,083 476,174 275,635 2025 $D D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 509,506 2026 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 51,252 0 0 25,823 0 O 471,624 504,638 O 0 16 ,971 O 0 28,752 O D 36,607 O 0 356,388 O D 359,474 O o 0 O o 0 O D 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 D O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 D FILE: SCHEDULE: RA NGE: 2027 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 381,336 0 63,481 53,126 236.065 400,095 508,447 JAWY_W W ast ew at er - D ebt Wast ewater_CIP_ Debt 2028 $o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 49,940 O 57,326 O 30,670 O 441,670 O 369,089 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 2029 $0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 472,587 394,925 26,632 11,855 20,103 346,816 398,963 426,282 0 0 0 0 Total $6,000 10,200 15,000 575,000 60,000 80,000 15,500 200,003 145,000 275,000 92,448 138,886 360,162 358,557 6,755 68,465 1,330,841 67,867 94,083 985,681 275,635 51,252 25,823 976,263 16,971 28,752 36,607 737,724 359,474 63,481 53,126 236,065 400,095 508,447 49,940 57,326 30,670 914,257 764,014 26,632 11,855 20,103 346,816 398,963 426,282 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 $16,200 $1,415,500 $950,053 $718,139 $1,601,682 81,058,206 $1,302,830 $1,642,549 $948,696 $2,098,163 $11,752,018 Page E - 9 Pr epa red l': RFC 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study In puts and Ass umpti ons Wastewater Beginning of Year Cash Wastewater Operating Fund June 30, 2019 Cash and cash equivalents $251,828 Investments 4,289,620 Account receiv able 283,350 Accounts payable (85,193) Balance $4,739,605 Wastewater CIP Fund June 30, 2019 Cash $0 Accounts Receivable 0 Accounts Payable 0 Balance $0 Prepared by Raftelis Page E - 10 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate Study Inputs and Assumptions FILE: JAWY_W W SCHEDULE: Setup R ANGE: W_W W_Setup Escalation Factors Line No . Description Escalati on List 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 1 Interest Earning Rate Interest_Rate 2 .0% 2.5% 2 .5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2 .5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2 Other Revenues Oth er Rev 1.0 % 1 .0 % 1 .0% 1.0 % 1.0 % 1.0% 1.0 % 1.0 % 1.0% 3 Tap Fee TapFee_Rev 2.0% 2.0% 2.0 % 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0 % 4 Water Capacity Fee Increase/D ecreas e WPIF 0.0 % 305.0 % 3 .0% 3.0 % 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0 % 3.0 % 3.0% 5 Wastewater Capacity Increase/D ecrease WW_PIF 0.0% 109.0% 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0 % 6 Capital Program Co sts (CIP) CIP 0.0 % 7 .0 % 7 .0% 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0% 7.0 % 7.0 % 7.0% 7 Cumulative CIP Incre ase 0.0% 7.0% 14.5% 22.5% 31 .1% 40.3% 50.1% 60 .6% 71.8% 8 Materials Materials 5.0 % 5 .0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 9 Personnel Personnel 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 10 Be nefits Ben efits 5.0 % 5 .0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 11 Supplies Supplies 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 12 Operating Expense s Op_Ex 5.0 % 5 .0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0 % 5.0% 13 Constant Constant 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 % 14 Utilities Util 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5 .0% 5 .0% 5.0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5 .0% 15 Other Other 3.0 % 3 .0% 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3 .0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 16 Indirect Costs Indirect 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0 % 5.0% 17 Capital (O&M) Cap_O M 5.0 % 5 .0% 5.0 % 5.0% 5.0% 5 .0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 18 Services Services 3 .0 % 3.0% 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3 .0% 3.0% Prepa re d by Roftelis Page E - 11 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY SCHEDULE: WW -Accounts Sewer Financial Plan and Rate St udy R ANGE: WW_ Accounts A ccounts by Meter Size - Wastewater Utility Wa stewater Accou nts Meter Size 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential 2,724 2,784 2,814 2,845 2,876 2,907 2,939 2,971 3,003 3,036 Commercial 767 783 791 799 807 816 825 834 843 852 Employees 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Melody Ranch 356 356 356 356 356 356 356 356 356 356 M ulti Family 161 165 165 165 165 165 165 165 165 165 3 Creek Ranch 112 116 118 120 122 124 126 128 130 132 Government 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 58 Contract Customers Outside Town 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Rafter J 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 Schools 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Sewer Only Customers 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 To tal Wastewater Accounts 4,691 4,775 4,815 4,856 4,897 4,939 4,982 5,025 5,068 5,112 G rowth in Wa ste water Ac counts 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residentia l 2 .20% 2.20 % 1 .10 % 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10 % 1.10 % 1.10% Commercial 2.20 % 2 .20% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10 % 1.10 % 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10% Employees 0 .00% 0.00 % 0 .00 % 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00% Melody Ranch 0.00% 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% Multi Family 2.20 % 2.20% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10 % 1.10 % 1.10% 1.10% 1 .10% 3 Creek Ra nch 1 .00% 4.00 % 1 .10 % 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1 .10% 1.10 % 1.10 % 1.10% Government 0.00 % 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% Contract Customers Outside Town 0.00% 0.00 % 0 .00 % 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00% Rafter J 0.00% 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% Schools 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0 .00 % 0 .00 % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sewer Only Customers 2.20% 2 .20 % 1.10 % 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1.10% 1 .10 % 1 .10 % 1.10% Page E - 12 Prepare d by Rafte lis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study FILE: JAWY W SCHEDULE: Ac counts Mon thly Wastewater Ser vice Charge Pr oj ected Pr oje ct ed Pr ojected Proje ct ed Pr oje ct ed Proj ected Pr ojected Projected Projected Projected Custo mer Class 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial Rate Increases 0.00% 0.00% 5.00 % 6.00 % 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6 .00 % 6.00% Sewer Commercial Base Fee 3/4 M ete $7.05 $7 .05 $7.05 $7.40 $7.85 $8.32 $8.82 $9 .35 $9.91 $10.50 $11.13 Sewer Resid ential Base Fee 3/4 M eter' 7.05 7.05 7 .05 7 .40 7.85 8.32 8.82 9.35 9 .91 10 .50 11 .13 Sewer Base Fee 2 Meter" 25.20 25.20 25 .20 26 .46 28.05 29.73 31.51 33.41 35 .41 37 .53 39 .79 Social Service Base Fe e 1 Meter" 7 .35 7.35 7.35 7.72 8 .18 8 .67 9 .19 9.74 10.33 10.95 11.60 Social Services Base Fe e 3/4 Meter" 5.29 5 .29 5.29 5.55 5.89 6.24 6.62 7 .01 7.43 7.88 8.35 Social Service Base Fe e 2 Meter " 18.90 18.90 18 .90 19 .85 21.04 22.30 23.64 25.05 26 .56 28 .15 29 .84 Sewer Base Fee 1 Meter " 9.80 9.80 9 .80 10 .29 10.91 11.56 12.26 12.99 13 .77 14 .60 15 .47 Sewer Base Fee 1.5 Meter " 17 .11 17.11 17.11 17.97 19 .04 20 .19 21 .40 22.68 24.04 25.48 27.01 Sewer Base Fee 3 Met er " 52 .76 52.76 52.76 55.40 58 .72 62 .25 65 .98 69.94 74.14 78.58 83.30 Sewer Base Fee 4 Meter" 81.24 81 .24 81.24 85.30 90.42 95.85 101.60 107 .69 114.15 121.00 128.26 Sewer Base Fee 6 Meter" 153.23 153.23 153 .23 160 .89 170.54 180.78 191.62 203.12 215 .31 228 .23 241 .92 Sewer 3 Creeks Base Fee 3/4 Meter " 51.15 73.30 73 .30 76 .96 81.58 86.47 91.66 97.16 102 .99 109 .17 115 .72 Sewer 3 Creek Base Fee 1.5 Meter" 51 .15 73 .30 73.30 76.96 81 .58 86 .47 91 .66 97.16 102.99 109.17 115.72 Deferred Rate Increase Percent of Year Increase in Effect 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Page E 13 Prepa red by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY FILE: JAWY W Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Ac counts Monthly WW Service Charge Re venue: Bas e 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial $236,297 $241,368 $246,609 $261,709 $280,440 $300,478 $321,910 $344,944 $369,584 $395,939 Commercial 108,824 110,652 112,563 119,327 127,690 136,627 146,283 156,606 167,640 179,435 Employees 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,456 1,543 1,636 1,734 1,838 1,948 2,065 Melody Ranch 34,165 34,165 34,165 35,874 38,026 40,308 42,726 45,290 48,007 50,887 Multi Family 29,977 30,687 31,397 32,967 34,945 37,042 39,264 41,620 44,117 46,764 3 Creek Ranch 94,990 98,508 102,027 108,975 117,471 126,595 136,391 146,906 158,192 170,303 Governme nt 11,348 11,348 11,348 11,915 12,630 13,388 14,191 15,043 15,945 16,902 Contract Customers Outside Town 14,729 14,729 14,729 15,466 16,394 17,377 18,420 19,525 20,697 21,938 Rafter J 82,212 82,212 82,212 86,323 91,502 96,992 102,812 108,980 115,519 122,450 Schools 6,121 6,121 6,121 6,428 6,813 7,222 7,655 8,115 8,601 9,118 Sewer Only Customers 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,733 1,836 1,947 2,063 2,187 2,318 2,458 To ta l M onthly WW Serv ice Charge Revenue: B ase $621,701 $632,828 $644,209 $682,171 $729,292 $779,611 $833,449 $891,054 $952,570 $1,018,260 Mon thly WW Serv ice Cha rge Rev enue: Growth Reside ntial $5,072 $5,241 $2,637 $2,858 $3,029 $3,211 $3,509 $3,720 $3,943 $4,306 Commercial 1,827 1,912 1,081 1,135 1,204 1,376 1,458 1,546 1,638 1,737 Employee s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Melody Ranch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multi Family 710 710 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Creek Ranch 3,518 3,518 1,759 1,847 1,958 2,075 2,200 2,332 2,472 2,620 Governme nt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Contract Custo mers Outside To wn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rafter J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Schools 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sewer Only Custo mers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To ta l Mo nthly WW Serv ice Charge Revenue : Gro wth $11,127 $11,381 $5,477 $5,840 $6,191 $6,662 $7,167 $7,597 $8,053 $8,662 Mon thly WW Serv ice Charge Rev enue: Rate Inc rease Reside ntial $0 $0 $12,462 $15,874 $17,008 $18,221 $19,525 $20,920 $22,412 $24,015 Commercial 0 0 5,682 7,228 7,734 8,280 8,864 9,489 10,157 10,870 Employees 0 0 69 87 93 98 104 110 117 124 M elody Ranch 0 0 1,708 2,152 2,282 2,418 2,564 2,717 2,880 3,053 Multi Family 0 0 1,570 1,978 2,097 2,223 2,356 2,497 2,647 2,806 3 Creek Ranch 0 0 5,189 6,649 7,166 7,720 8,315 8,954 9,640 10,375 Governme nt 0 0 567 715 758 803 851 903 957 1,014 Contract Customers Outside Town 0 0 736 928 984 1,043 1,105 1,172 1,242 1,316 RafterJ 0 0 4,111 5,179 5,490 5,820 6,169 6,539 6,931 7,347 Schools 0 0 306 386 409 433 459 487 516 547 Sewer Only Customers 0 0 83 104 110 117 124 131 139 147 To ta l Monthly WW Serv ice Charge Revenue : Ra te Inc rease $0 $0 $32,484 $41,281 $44,129 $47,176 $50,437 $53,919 $57,637 $61,615 Projected Monthly WW Serv ice Cha rge Re venue - Full Yea r Inc rease s 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial $241,368 $246,609 $261,709 $280,440 $300,478 $321,910 $344,944 $369,584 $395,939 $424,259 Commercial 110,652 112,563 119,327 127,690 136,627 146,283 156,606 167,640 179,435 192,042 Employees 1,387 1,387 1,456 1,543 1,636 1,734 1,838 1,948 2,065 2,189 Melody Ranch 34,165 34,165 35,874 38,026 40,308 42,726 45,290 48,007 50,887 53,941 M ulti Family 30,687 31,397 32,967 34,945 37,042 39,264 41,620 44,117 46,764 49,570 3 Creek Ranch 98,508 102,027 108,975 117,471 126,595 136,391 146,906 158,192 170,303 183,299 Governme nt 11,348 11,348 11,915 12,630 13,388 14,191 15,043 15,945 16,902 17,916 Contract Customers Outside Town 14,729 14,729 15,466 16,394 17,377 18,420 19,525 20,697 21,938 23,255 RafterJ 82,212 82,212 86,323 91,502 96,992 102,812 108,980 115,519 122,450 129,797 Schools 6,121 6,121 6,428 6,813 7,222 7,655 8,115 8,601 9,118 9,665 Sewer Only Customers 1,650 1,650 1,733 1,836 1,947 2,063 2,187 2,318 2,458 2,605 Total Projected M on thly WW Serv ice Charge Reven ue - Full Year Incr $632,828 $644,209 $682,171 $729,292 $779,611 $833,449 $891,054 $952,570 $1,018,260 $1,088,538 Page E 14 Prepa red by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and R ate Study Billed VolumelStrength - Wastewater Utility FILE: JAWY_WW SCHEDULE: Water Usage R ANGE: W W_V ol Pr ojected Pr ojected Pr oj ected Pr ojected Pr oje cted Projected Pr oje cted Pr ojected Pr ojected Pr oject ed Billed Wastewater Volume (kgal) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential 120,769 122,195 122,277 122,388 122,484 122,566 122,676 122,771 122,853 122,962 Commercial 304,472 310,822 313,997 317,172 320,347 323,921 327,495 331,069 334,643 338,217 Employee s 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 379 Melody Ranch 18,688 18,502 18,318 18,135 17,954 17,775 17,598 17,423 17,249 17,077 Multi Family 53,483 54,264 53,722 53,184 52,651 52,124 51,601 51,084 50,574 50,068 3 Cree k Ranch 10,973 11,251 11,331 11,408 11,482 11,554 11,622 11,688 11,752 11,814 Contract Cu stomers O utside Town 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 63,858 Government 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 19,547 Rafter) 47,001 46,531 46,066 45,606 45,150 44,699 44,252 43,810 43,371 42,937 Schools 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 6,807 Sewer On ly Cu stomers 5,601 5,545 5,489 5,434 5,380 5,326 5,272 5,219 5,166 5,114 To ta l Billed Wastewater V olume (kgal) 651,578 659,701 661,791 663,918 666,039 668,556 671,107 673,655 676,199 678,780 Prepared by Raftelis Page E - 15 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and R ate Study SCHEDULE: Water Usage RANGE: WW_V ol A ssumed Perc ent In crease/Decrease Du e to Gr owth 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential 2 .2% 2.2% 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1% 1.1 % Co mmercial 2.0°% 2 .1% 1.0°% 1 .0°% 1.0 % 1 .1 % 1.1 % 1.1 % 1.1% 1.1 % Employees 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Melody Ranch 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0.0% 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0 % 0.0% Multi Family 2.5% 2 .5% 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0 % 3 Creek Ranch 3.7% 3.6% 1 .7 % 1.7 % 1 .7 % 1.6 % 1 .6 % 1 .6 % 1 .6% 1 .5 % Contract Cu stomers Outside Town 0.0 % 0.0% 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0 .0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% Government 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0% 0.0"% Rafter J 0 .0% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0 % Schools 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0 % Sewer Only Custo mers 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0% 0.0 % Increase/Decrea se in Billed Vo lume 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential -1.0% -1.0% -1 .0 % -1.0 % -1 .0 % -1.0 % -1 .0 % -1 .0 % -1 .0% -1 .0 % Co mmercial 0.0°% 0.0% 0 .0 % 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0°% 0 .0 % 0 .0 % 0 .0% 0 .0°% Employee s 0.0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% 0 .0% Melo dy Ranch -1 .0°% -1.0% -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0°% -1.0°% -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0% -1.0 % Multi Family -1 .0% -1.0% -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0% -1.0 % 3 Creek Ranch -1.0°% -1 .0°% -1.0 % -1 .0 % -1.0°% -1 .0°% -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0°% -1.0 % Co ntract Customers O utside Town 0.0 % 0 .0 % 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 0 .0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.0% Government 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0.0% 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% 0.0°% Rafter J -1.0% -1 .0% -1.0 % -1 .0 % -1.0 % -1 .0 % -1.0 % -1.0 % -1.0% -1.0 % Schools 0.0°% 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0.0°% 0 .0 % 0.0°% 0 .0°% 0 .0°% 0 .0°% 0 .0°% Sewer Only Custo mers -1.0% -1.0% -1 .0% -1.0% -1 .0% -1.0% -1 .0% -1 .0% -1 .0% -1 .0% Page E - 16 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sew er Fi nancial Pl an and Rate St udy Billed Volum e - Wastew at er Utility FILE: JAWY_WW SCHEDULE: W at er Us age R ANGE: WW_V oI_Rate Wastewater Volume Rates ($/kgal) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential Volume Sewer Residential 3/41000 gal " 401 $2.27 $2 .27 $2.38 $2 .53 $2.68 $2.84 $3 .01 $3.19 $3 .38 $3.58 Sewer Senior Citizen 402 1.14 1 .14 1.20 1 .27 1.34 1.43 1 .51 1.60 1 .70 1.80 Sewer 2" 10,000 galllons 403 2.27 2 .27 2.38 2 .53 2.68 2.84 3 .01 3.19 3 .38 3.58 Social Services 3/4 1000 gal" 404 1 .70 1.70 1 .79 1.89 2 .01 2.13 2.25 2 .39 2.53 2 .68 Sewer Flat Rate (B ook 6) 405 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 Sewer Commercial 3/4 1000ga1" 406 2.27 2.27 2.38 2.53 2.68 2 .84 3.01 3.19 3.38 3.58 Sewer Employee Rafter J 407 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Social Services 2" 10,000gal 408 1.70 1 .70 1.79 1 .89 2.01 2.13 2 .25 2.39 2 .53 2.68 Sewer 1. 5" 10,000 galllons 409 2.27 2 .27 2.38 2 .53 2.68 2.84 3 .01 3.19 3 .38 3.58 Sewer 4/per gal/.00105 410 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 Sewer 4" 10,000 galllo ns 411 2.27 2 .27 2.38 2 .53 2.68 2.84 3 .01 3.19 3 .38 3.58 3" hydrant Tet Science Sch 412 2 .27 2.27 2 .38 2.53 2 .68 2.84 3.01 3 .19 3.38 3 .58 Sewer 3 Creek -1.5" 10,000 gal 413 1 .88 1.88 1 .97 2.09 2 .22 2.35 2.49 2 .64 2.80 2 .97 Sewer Melody Ranch 1 meter" 414 2 .27 2.27 2 .38 2.53 2 .68 2.84 3.01 3 .19 3.38 3 .58 Sewer Melody Ranc h 3/4 inch 420 2 .27 2.27 2 .38 2.53 2 .68 2.84 3.01 3 .19 3.38 3 .58 Sewe r 3 Cree ks -3/4 1000 gal" 421 1.88 1.88 1.97 2.09 2.22 2 .35 2.49 2.64 2.80 2.97 Sewer 6 /per gal/.00105' 422 2.27 2.27 2.38 2.53 2.68 2 .84 3.01 3.19 3.38 3.58 Sewer 3" 10,000gal Meter 423 2.27 2 .27 2.38 2 .53 2.68 2.84 3 .01 3.19 3 .38 3.58 Sewer 1 1000 galllons" 424 2.27 2 .27 2.38 2 .53 2.68 2.84 3 .01 3.19 3 .38 3.58 Social Service 1" 1,000 gal 425 1.70 1 .70 1.79 1 .89 2.01 2.13 2 .25 2.39 2 .53 2.68 Sewer Employee 426 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 Prepared by Raftelis Page E - 17 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_WW Water and Sewer Fin ancial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Wat er Usage Billed Volum e - Wastewat er Utility R ANGE: WW_V ol_Rate_R ev Wa stewater Volum e Re venue: Base 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Residential Volume $270,897 $274,023 $277,258 $291,316 $309,076 $327,877 $347,783 $368,981 $391,422 $415,185 Commercial Volume 658,513 671,647 685,654 727,290 778,722 833,707 893,589 957,656 1,026,195 1,099,510 Employees Vo lume 177 177 177 186 197 209 221 235 249 264 Melody Ranch Volume 42,851 42,422 42,000 43,661 45,818 48,083 50,459 52,954 55,573 58,320 Multi Family Volume 118,938 120,749 122,512 127,353 133,643 140,242 147,169 154,435 162,061 170,069 3 Creek Ranch Volume 20,093 20,629 21,152 22,367 23,871 25,467 27,164 28,964 30,876 32,907 Contract Customers Outside Town Volume 144,958 144,958 144,958 152,206 161,338 171,018 181,279 192,156 203,685 215,906 G overnment Vo lume 44,369 44,369 44,369 46,588 49,383 52,346 55,487 58,816 62,345 66,086 Ra fte r J Volume 94,837 93,887 92,947 96,620 101,394 106,404 111,661 117,178 122,968 129,041 Schools Vo lume 15,452 15,452 15,452 16,224 17,198 18,230 19,324 20,483 21,712 23,015 Sewer Only Customers Volume 12,619 12,492 12,367 12,854 13,489 14,156 14,855 15,587 16,357 17,162 Total Wastewater V olume Rev enue: Base $1,423,705 $1,440,805 $1,458,846 $1,536,666 $1,634,128 $1,737,739 $1,848,992 $1,967,444 $2,093,443 $2,227,464 Wastewater V olume Revenue: Growth Residential Volume 3,128 3,237 186 265 243 220 312 286 262 369 Commercial Volume 13,515 14,415 7,207 7,568 8,022 9,572 10,146 10,755 11,400 12,084 Employees Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Melody Ranch V olume (429) (422) (418) (436) (457) (479) (502) (527) (555) (582) Multi Family Volume 1,821 1,773 (1,230) (1,282) (1,347) (1,411) (1,485) (1,556) (1,627) (1,711) 3 Creek Ranch Volume 647 631 182 184 187 193 193 199 204 210 Contract Customers Outside Town Volume D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Government Volume D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rafter J Volume (1,079) (1,067) (1,056) (1,096) (1,152) (1,208) (1,269) (1,330) (1,400) (1,467) Schools Volume (0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sewer Only Customers Volume (129) (127) (127) (131) (136) (145) (153) (159) (169) (176) Total Was te wa ter V olume R ev enue : Gro wth $17,473 $18,439 $4,744 $5,070 $5,359 $6,741 $7,242 $7,667 $8,114 $8,726 Wastewater Volume Revenue: Rate Increase Residential Vo lume $0 $0 $13,878 $17,503 $18,567 $19,695 $20,895 $22,166 $23,512 $24,944 Commercial Volume 0 0 35,639 45,359 48,562 52,050 55,781 59,773 64,044 68,612 Emplo yees Volume 0 0 43 54 57 61 65 68 73 77 Melody Ranch Vo lume 0 0 2,079 2,593 2,722 2,856 2,997 3,146 3,301 3,464 M ulti Family Volume 0 0 6,097 7,606 7,981 8,376 8,789 9,223 9,679 10,157 3 Cree k Ranch Volume 0 0 1,286 1,631 1,741 1,857 1,980 2,110 2,249 2,397 Contract Customers Outside Town Volume 0 0 7,248 9,132 9,680 10,261 10,877 11,529 12,221 12,954 Gove rnme nt Volume 0 0 2,219 2,795 2,963 3,141 3,329 3,529 3,741 3,965 Rafter J Vo lume 0 0 5,228 6,522 6,844 7,183 7,537 7,910 8,300 8,710 Schoo ls Vo lume D 0 773 973 1,032 1,094 1,159 1,229 1,303 1,381 Sewer Only Customers Volume 0 0 623 777 816 856 898 942 989 1,037 Total Wastewater Volume Revenue: R ate Increase $0 $0 $75,113 $94,947 $100,965 $107,428 $114,308 $121,626 $129,411 $137,699 6A% Projected Wastewater Volu me Revenue - Full Y ear Increase R esidential Volume $274,023 $277,258 $291,316 $309,076 $327,877 $347,783 $368,981 $391,422 $415,185 $440,487 Commercial Volume 671,647 685,654 727,290 778,722 833,707 893,589 957,656 1,026,195 1,099,510 1,177,928 Employees Volume 177 177 186 197 209 221 235 249 264 280 Melody Ranch Volume 42,422 42,000 43,661 45,818 48,083 50,459 52,954 55,573 58,320 61,202 Multi Family Volume 120,749 122,512 127,353 133,643 140,242 147,169 154,435 162,061 170,069 178,469 3 Creek Ranch Volume 20,629 21,152 22,367 23,871 25,467 27,164 28,964 30,876 32,907 35,066 Contract Customers Outside Town V olume 144,958 144,958 152,206 161,338 171,018 181,279 192,156 203,685 215,906 228,861 Government Volume 44,369 44,369 46,588 49,383 52,346 55,487 58,816 62,345 66,086 70,051 Rafter J Volume 93,887 92,947 96,620 101,394 106,404 111,661 117,178 122,968 129,041 135,414 Schools V olume 15,452 15,452 16,224 17,198 18,230 19,324 20,483 21,712 23,015 24,396 Sewer Only Customers Volume 12,492 12,367 12,854 13,489 14,156 14,855 15,587 16,357 17,162 18,009 Total Projected Volume Revenue - Full Y ear Increase $1,440,805 $1,458,846 $1,536,666 $1,634,128 $1,737,739 $1,848,992 $1,967,444 $2,093,443 $2,227,464 $2,370,162 Page E - 18 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Fin anci al Plan and Rat e Study Strength Charges - Wastewater Utility Overall Rate Increase FILE: JAWY_WW SCHEDULE: Water Usag e RAN GE: WW_Strength_Rev 0.00% 0.00% 5.00% 6.00% 6 .00 / 6 .00 % 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% 6.00% Wastewater Su rcharge: Rates ($) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Restaurant 1000gal 601 $1.63 51 .63 $1 .71 51 .81 $1 .92 52.04 $2.16 $2.29 $2.43 $2.57 Restaurant 10,000 gal 602 1.63 1.63 1.71 1.81 1.92 2.04 2.16 2.29 2.43 2.57 M eat Processing 10,000 gal 603 2 .06 2.06 2.16 2.29 2.43 2 .58 2 .73 2 .89 3 .07 3 .25 Meat Processing 1000 gal 604 2.06 2 .06 2 .16 2 .29 2 .43 2.58 2.73 2.89 3.07 3.25 Kennel 1000 gal 605 0 .91 0.91 0.96 1.01 1.07 1.14 1 .21 1 .28 1 .36 1 .44 Auto Repair 10,000 gal 606 0 .80 0 .80 0.84 0.89 0.94 1.00 1 .06 1 .12 1 .19 1 .26 Co mme rc ia l Laundry 10,000 g al 607 1.36 1.36 1 .43 1 .51 1 .60 1.70 1.80 1.91 2.03 2.15 Commercial Printing 1000 gal 608 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.89 0.94 1 .00 1.06 1.12 1.19 1.26 Hotel/M otel NO FOO D 1000 gal 609 0 .80 0 .80 0.84 0.89 0.94 1.00 1 .06 1 .12 1 .19 1 .26 Hote l/M otel FOO D 10,000 gal 610 1.18 1.18 1 .24 1 .31 1 .39 1.48 1.56 1.66 1.76 1.86 Car Wash 10,000 gal 611 0.71 0.71 0 .75 0 .79 0 .84 0.89 0.94 1.00 1.06 1.12 Fruit & Vegetable Canning 1000 612 0 .09 0 .09 0 .10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0 .13 0 .14 0 .14 School 10,000 gal 613 0 .80 0 .80 0 .84 0.89 0.94 1.00 1.06 1 .12 1 .19 1 .26 Fast Food Serv ice 1000 gal 614 0.09 0.09 0.10 0 .10 0 .11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 Photo Processing 1000 gal 615 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0 .10 0 .11 0.11 0.12 0.13 Hotel/Motel FOOD 1000 gal 620 0 .12 0 .12 0 .12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0 .17 0 .18 0 .19 Ho te l/Mo te l NO FOO D 10,000 ga l 621 0.80 0.80 0.84 0 .89 0 .94 1.00 1.06 1.12 1.19 1.26 Mortuary 1,000 gal 622 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0 .11 0 .12 0.13 0.14 0.14 Hospitals 10,000 gal 623 1 .18 1 .18 1 .24 1.31 1.39 1.48 1.56 1 .66 1 .76 1.86 Ca r Wash 1000 gal 625 0.07 0.07 0.07 0 .08 0 .08 0 .09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 Fast Food Service 10,000 gal 626 0.91 0.91 0.96 1.01 1.07 1.14 1 .21 1 .28 1.36 1 .44 School 1000 gal 627 0. 08 0 .08 0 .08 0 .09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0 .12 0.13 Ba ke rie s 1000 ga l 629 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0 .19 0 .20 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.26 Commercial Laundry 1000 gal 630 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0 .16 0 .17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 Auto Repair 1000 gal 631 0. 08 0 .08 0 .08 0 .09 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0 .12 0.13 Breweries Surchage 1,000 Gallo n A 632 0. 52 0.52 0.55 0.58 0.61 0 .65 0 .69 0 .73 0 .77 0 .82 Breweries Surcharge 10,000 Gallo r 635 5.20 5.20 5 .46 5 .79 6 .13 6.50 6.89 7.31 7.75 8.21 Wastewater Surcharge: Vo lume 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Commercia Restaurant 1000gal 601 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 18,037 Commercia Restaurant 10,000 gal 602 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 18,827 Co mme rcia Mea t Proce ssing 10,000 ga l 603 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,390 3,390 3.390 3,390 Commercia Meat Processing 1000 gal 604 4,139 4,139 4,139 4,139 4,139 4,139 4,139 4,139 4 .139 4,139 Commercia Kennel 1000 gal 605 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Commercia Auto Repair 10,000 gal 606 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 Commercia Commercial Laundry 10,000 gal 607 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 5,810 Commercia Com mercial Printing 1000 gal 608 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 Commercia Hotel/M otel NO FO OD 1000 gal 609 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 24,355 Comme rcia Hotel/Motel FOOD 10,000 gal 610 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 20,370 Commercia Car Wash 10,000 gal 611 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Commercia Fruit & Vegetable Canning 1000 612 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 267 Co mme rcia Fa st Foo d Serv ice 1000 ga l 614 2,497 2,497 2,497 2,497 2,497 2,497 2,497 2,497 2.497 2,497 Commercia Photo Processing 1000 gal 615 362 362 362 362 362 362 362 362 362 362 Commercia Hotel/M otel FO OD 1000 gal 620 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 10,648 Commercia Hotel/M otel NO FOOD 10,000 gal 621 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 67,120 Co mmercia M ortuary 1,000 gal 622 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 Commercia Hospitals 10,000 gal 623 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 11,370 Co mme rcia Ca r Was h 1000 ga l 625 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 1,734 Commercia Fast Food Service 10,000 gal 626 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 6,220 Commercia Bakeries 1000 gal 629 649 649 649 649 649 649 649 649 649 649 Commercia Commercial Laundry 1000 gal 630 2,087 2,087 2, 087 2,087 2,087 2,087 2,087 2,087 2,087 2,087 Commercia Auto Repair 1000 gal 631 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 2,026 Commercia Breweries Surchage 1,000 Gallon A 632 1,433 1,433 1,433 1, 433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 1,433 Commercia Breweries Surcharge 10, 000 Gallo r 635 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Mufti -Fa mily Hotel/Motel NO FOOD 1000 gal 609 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 G overnmen Auto Repair 10,000 gal 606 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Governmen Auto Repair 1000 gal 631 479 479 479 479 479 479 479 479 479 479 Schoo l Schoo l 1000 ga l 627 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 1,341 Sewer Only Restaurant 1000gal 601 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 708 Wastewater Strength: Re venu e 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Commercial Surcharge $209,298 $209,298 5219,763 $232,949 $246,926 $261,741 $277,446 $294,093 $311,738 $330,442 Multi Family Surcharge 250 250 263 279 295 313 332 352 373 395 Government Surcharge 398 398 418 443 470 498 528 560 593 629 Schools Surcharge 915 915 961 1,019 1,080 1,145 1,213 1,286 1,363 1,445 Sewer O nly Customers Surcharge 1,154 1,154 1,212 1,284 1,362 1,443 1,530 1,622 1,719 1,822 Tota l 5212,016 $212,016 5222,617 $235,974 $250,132 $265,140 $281,049 $297,912 $315,786 $334,734 Page E - 19 Prepared by Rahelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study FILE: JAWY W SCHEDULE: Ac counts 3/4" Equivalents by Class 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial 2,943 3,006 3,038 3,071 3,104 3,137 3,171 3,205 3,239 3,274 Commercial 1,644 1,671 1,687 1,703 1,719 1,736 1,753 1,770 1,787 1,804 Employees 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 Melody Ranch 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 438 M ulti Family 495 506 506 506 506 506 506 506 506 506 3 Creek Ranch 242 251 255 260 264 268 273 277 281 286 Governme nt 166 166 166 166 166 166 166 166 166 166 Contract Customers Outside Town 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 RafterJ 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 Schools 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 Sewer Only Customers 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 To ta l ERUs 6,695 6,805 6,857 6,911 6,964 7,018 7,074 7,129 7,184 7,241 Number of ERUs Added 107 110 52 54 53 54 56 55 55 57 % of ERUs Added 1 .62% 1.64% 0.76 % 0.79 % 0 .77% 0 .78% 0 .80% 0 .78% 0.77 % 0.79 % 3/4" Equivale nts by Meter Co st 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial 2,879 2,941 2,972 3,005 3,037 3,069 3,102 3,136 3,169 3,203 Commercial 1,400 1,425 1,439 1,453 1,467 1,483 1,498 1,513 1,528 1,543 Employees 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Melody Ranch 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 Multi Family 396 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 3 Creek Ranch 242 250 255 259 263 268 272 276 281 285 Governme nt 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 Contract Customers Outside Town 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RafterJ 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 Schools 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 Sewer Only Customers 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 To ta l Sewer ERUs % Change 6,114 6,219 6,269 6,320 6,370 6,423 6,475 6,528 6,581 6,634 1.70% 1.72% 0.80% 0.81% 0.79 % 0.83 % 0.81% 0.82% 0 .81% 0.81% Page E - 20 Prepa red by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY FILE: JAWY W Water Financi al Pl an and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Ac counts 3/4" Equival ents by Meter C ost 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Reside ntial 2,879 2,941 2,972 3,005 3,037 3,069 3,102 3,136 3,169 3,203 Commercial 1,400 1,425 1,439 1,453 1,467 1,483 1,498 1,513 1,528 1,543 Employees 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Melody Ranch 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 409 Multi Family 396 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 406 3 Cre ek Ranch 242 250 255 259 263 268 272 276 281 285 Governme nt 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 Contract Customers Outside Town 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RafterJ 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 446 Schools 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 Sewer Only Customers 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 To ta l Sewer ERUs % Change 6,114 6,219 6,269 6,320 6,370 6,423 6,475 6,528 6,581 6,634 1.70% 1.72% 0 .80% 0 .81% 0.79% 0.83% 0.81 % 0.82 % 0.81 % 0 .81% Page E 21 Prepa red by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water Financial Plan and Rate Study Descripti on PIF Increase FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Accounts 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 0.0 % 0.0% 109.0% 3.0 % 3.0 % 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% ERUs A dded Each Year 107 110 52 54 53 54 56 55 55 57 Capacity Fee per Equivalent User $2,172 $2,172 $4,539 $4,676 $4,816 $4,960 $5,109 $5,263 $5,420 $5,583 Wa stewater PiF Revenue $232,404 $238,920 $236,053 $252,486 $255,245 $267,862 $286,117 $289,438 $298,121 $318,230 Page E - 22 Prepare d by Rafte lis 12/14/2021 Town of Ja ckso n, WY W ater a nd S ewer Fi nan ci al Pl an and Rate St udy Sewer Average Residential Bill C alculati on FILE: J AWY_WW SCHEDULE: CASHFL OW R ANGE: C ASHFLOW Line No. D escription Projected 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Test Year 2022 1 Annual Increase 2 Effective M onth of Adjustment (1=July) 3 M onthly Fixe d Charge 4 Monthly V olume Rate per 1,000 gallons 5 Vo lume (1,000 ga llons) 6 M onthly Volume Charge 7 Av g. Mo nthly Res. Bill - Wastewater 8 A verage A nnual Residential Bill (1) 9 Compound Increase (1) Assumes residential custo mer using 4,000 gall ons. 0 .00% 1 $7.05 2.27 4.00 9.08 $16 .13 0.00% 1 $7 .05 2 .27 4 .00 9 .08 $16.13 5 .00 % 1 $7.40 2.38 4.00 9.53 $16.94 6.00% $7.85 2.53 4.00 10.11 $17.95 6.00% $8 .32 2 .68 4 .00 10 .71 $19.03 6 .00 % 1 $8.82 2.84 4.00 11.36 820.17 6.00% 1 $9.35 3.01 4.00 12.04 $21.38 6.00 % 1 $9 .91 3 .19 4 .00 12 .76 $22.66 6 .00 % 1 $10.50 3.38 4.00 13.52 $24 .02 6.00% 1 $11.13 3.58 4.00 14.34 $25.47 $193 .56 $193.56 0 .0 % 0.0% $203.24 $215.43 5 .0% 6.0 % $228.36 $242.06 6.0 % 6 .0 % $256.58 $271.98 6.0 % 6.0 % $288 .30 $305.59 6.0 % 6.0% 5.00 % $7 .40 2 .38 4 .00 9 .53 $16.94 $203.24 5.0 % P reparrd by Rnfi 12 Page E - 23 12/14/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate Study Inputs and Assumptions Misc. Revenues Line No. Acco un t Description Account Number 1 Miscellaneous Revenue 2 Co unty So lar Farm EMP Match 3 Sewage Tap Fees 4 Sewage Interest Charges 5 One -Time Fees 6 Total Wastewater O pe rating Revenues FILE: JAWY_W W SCHEDULE: Setup R ANGE: W_W W_Setup Escalation Rate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Other_Rev 2,700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OtherRev 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TapFee_Rev 2,185 2,229 2,273 2,319 2,365 2,412 2,461 2,510 2,560 2,611 Other_Rev 2,122 2,132 2,153 2,175 2,197 2,219 2,241 2,263 2,286 2,309 Other_Re v 59,863 $66,870 $4,361 $4,427 $4,494 $4,562 $4,631 $4,701 $4,773 $4,846 $4,920 Prepa re d by Raftelis Page E - 24 12/14/2021 D i Hum. 11 11 11 11 "'11"" 4") 4P" IIg4 ()II"' ,4 11 3 (,)114 „ 'u" IIA II ' II„, II'ii?, II b II::::::„ IIgN :k: II 'V II 44 B 64, II Viii?, II II IINI D a S II Pi? II . II„, II:Z II II 'ii,'. A. IION II4 f,'::::: A IP A i II II I L'', 11''. s II 4.11 I0 ""4' Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_WW Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: WW_Cap_Fee Wastewater Capacity Fee Calculation Buy -In Approach Description Capacity RCN Total System Replacement Cost (1) $113,291,543 Less: Small Main Collecti on System (2) (32,094,540) Plus: NPV of Borrowing Cost 0 Total Cost for Capacity Fee Calculation $81,197,003 Treatment Plant Capacity (MGD) (3) Value per 3/4" Equivalent M eter $16.24 Residential ERU Indoo r Water Use (GPD) (4) 280 Calculated Fee per 3/4" Equivalent Meter Current Fee per 3/4" Equivalent M eter Difference - $ Difference - (1) RCN is the water system inventory and replacement cost per unit per Nelson Engineering May 2020 . (2) Excludes 8 -inch and smaller collection system pipelines. (3) Per Nelson Engineering, 5 MGD wastewater treatment plant capacity. (4) Indoor water use per ERU or 3 -bedroom residential unit. 4,547 2,172 $2,375 109% Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page F - 1 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Sewer Assets as of 6/30/2019 (Fr om Nels on Engineering) Line No 1 2 3 4 5 6 Item 6" PVC Sewer Main 8"PVC Sewer Main 10" PVC Sewer Main 12" PVC Sewer Main 15" PVC Sewer Main 18" PVC Sewer Main 7 48" dia. Manhole 8 Lift Stations: 9 Small Lift Stations 10 Large Lift Stations 11 12 Total Wastewater Treatment Plant Quantity Unit 13,194 Linear Foot 176,157 Linear Foot 6,893 Linear Foot 11,274 Linear Foot 15,296 Linear Foot 9,298 Linear Foot 1,405 Each 5 Each 2 Each 6,500,000 GPD FILE: SCHEDULE: Unit Cost $122.07 173 .05 271 .42 301.58 351.84 394.93 3,860.50 419,642.56 1,400,000.00 8.70 J AWY_WW WW_Cap_Fee Total $1,610,571 30,483,969 1,870,918 3,400,023 5,381,812 3,672,035 5,424,003 2,098,213 2,800,000 56,550,000 $ 113,291,543 Prepared by Raftelis 12/14/2021 Page F - 2 uuuuml muu um Town of Jacks on, WY FILE: J AWY_WW Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate SCHEDULE: COS Rev enue Req uirements R ANGE: C OS_TY Sewer Utility Line No. Description Revenue Requirements Operation & Maintenance Expense 1 Current Operations 2 Total Operation & Maintenance E xpense FY 2022 Test Year $2,161,511 2,161,511 Debt Service 3 Existing 0 4 Proposed 0 Capital 5 CIP 950,053 6 Total Capital Costs 950,053 7 Total Rev enue Requirements Wastewater Fund O ther Inflows / Outflows 3,111, 564 8 Interest Income (126,454) 9 Capacity Fee Revenue (236,053) 10 Misc. Revenues (4,427) 11 3 Creek Ca pital Replacement Surcharge (33,998) 12 Adjustment for partial year rate increases 0 13 Net Bond / Loan Proceeds 0 14 Total Wastewater Fund Other Inflows / Outflows (400,932) 15 Increase (Decrease) in Reserves (182,757) 16 Total Adjustments (583,689) 17 Ne t Cost of Se rvic e $2,527,875 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 1 12/13/2021 Town of J ack son, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study A llo cation of Sy st em Asset s (1) Sewer Utility Line N o. Description (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: (9) (10) JAWY_WW COS COS_PLTALL O Cust om er C ollection Assets (1) CI P (2) Total Volume BO D TSS TKN Lines Other $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 Treatment & Disposal $22,583,483 $92,448 $22,675,931 $6,802,779 2 Pumping / Lift Stations 1,924,835 15,003 1,939,835 1,939,835 $6,802,779 $6,802,779 $2,267,593 0 0 0 C ollectio n Li nes 3 Creek Meter s a nd 01 Ser vices Customer $ $ $0 $0 $0 0 0 0 Inte rce ptor an d Collec tion Lines (3) 3 Interceptor 5,136,408 1,113,143 6,249,551 6,249,551 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Collection Lines - Excluding 3 Creek 5,080,197 973,038 6,053,235 0 0 0 0 6,053,235 0 0 5 Co llection Line s - 3 Cree k (4) 1,798,273 0 1,798,273 0 0 0 0 0 1,798,273 0 6 Total In terce pto r and Collection Lin es 12,014,878 2,086,181 14,101,059 6,249,551 0 0 0 6,053,235 1,798,273 0 7 Meters / Metering 192,646 10,200 8 Subtotal of All Above Gene ra l Plan t 9 Miscellaneous /Admin 10 Total General Plant 11 To ta l Was te wa te r Sys te m Asse ts 202,846 0 Billi ng $ $0 0 0 0 0 0 202,846 0 36 ,715,841 2,203,829 38,919,671 14,992,165 6,802,779 6 ,802,779 2,267,593 6,053,235 1,798,273 202,846 1,426,981 50,003 1,476,981 568,945 258,162 258,162 86,054 229,717 68,244 7,698 0 1,426,981 50,000 1,476,981 568,945 258,162 258,162 86,054 229,717 68,244 7,698 0 $38,142,822 $2,253,829 $40,396,651 $15,561,110 $7,060,941 $7,060,941 $2,353,647 $6,282,952 $1,866,517 $210,543 $0 $0 12 Pe rcen t of To ta l 100 .0% 38.5 % 97 .5% 17.5 % 5.0% 15 .6 % 4.6 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 13 A nnual Capital Co sts $950,053 $365,968 $166,060 $166,060 $55,353 $147,763 $43,897 $4,952 $0 $0 A llocatio n of Fun ction s to Serv ice Deman d Catego ries 14 Treatme nt 100 .00 % 30.00 % 30 .00 % 30.00% 10 .00% 15 Pumpin g/ Lift Station s 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00% Sewer Lin es 16 Intercepto r 17 Collection Lines - Excluding 3 Creek 18 Co llection Line s - 3 Cree k (4) 19 Me te rs / Me te ring 20 Weighted Average For Miscellaneous /Admin (4) 100.00% 38 .52% 17.48% 17 .48 % 5.83 % 15.55% 4 .62% 0.52% 0 .00 % 0 .0D% 100 .00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00 % 0.00 % 0 .00 % 0.00% 100.00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 0.00 % 100 .00% 0 .00 % 0 .00 % 100.00% (1) Existing water system assets original cost as of 6/30/19 by functional designation. (2) Cu mula tive CIP by functio na l de signa tio n co nstructed thro ugh the te st ye ar. (3) An estimated 37.9% of the inch -feet of sewer system lines are interceptor and large main collection lines, remaining 662. 1% are small main collection lines. (4) 3 Creek asset costs are based on information provided to the Town when the assets were installed. Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 2 12/13/2021 Town of Jacks on, WY Water and Sewer Fin an cial Plan and Rat e Study O &M Allocation s to F un ctio nal Costs Sewer Utility (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Collecti on E xcl . Billing & Customer Line No. Description Total (1) Treatment I nterceptor 3 Creek C ollecti on 3 Creek Meter Services Service 1 Sewer Treatment Plant $980,974 $980,974 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Operations and Maintenance 323,912 0 95,374 186,046 42,493 0 0 3 Billing and Accounting 193,341 0 0 0 0 96,671 96,671 4 Indirect Co st Allo catio n-GF 663,283 434,289 42,223 82,365 18,812 42,797 42,797 5 Total O&M $2,161,511 A llo catio ns to Functions (2) 6 Sewe r Treatment Plant 7 Operations and Maintenance (3) 8 Billing and Accounting 9 Indire ct Cost Allocation-GF 10 Weighted Average 100 .0% 100.0% 100 .0% 100 .0% $1,415,263 $137,597 $268,410 $61,304 $139,468 $139,468 100 .00 % 0 .00 % 0.00% 65 .48% 0.00% 29 .44% 0.00 % 6.37 % 0 .00% 57.44% 0 .00 % 12.42 % 0.00% 13 .12% 0.00 % 2.84 % 0.00% 0.00% 50 .00% 6.45% 0 .00% 0.00% 50 .00 % 6 .45 % 100 .0% 65 .48 % 6.37% 12 .42% 2.84% 6.45% 6 .45% (1) Test year O&M expenses. (2) Allocations to funcational designations developed based on discussions with Raftelis, Nelson Engineering, and Town staff . (3) Operatio ns and Ma intenance O &M a llo cated to functio nal de signa tio ns based on c ost cent er empl oyee time to op er ations and maint en anc e per discussi ons with T own staff . Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 3 12/13/2021 Town of Ja ckson, WY FILE: JAWY_WW Water and Sewer Fi nancial Plan and Rate St udy SCHEDULE: C OS FTE Allocatio n for O& M Co st All ocation - S ewer (1) R AN GE: COS_OMFUNC2 Line Treatment & Pumping 3 Cre ek Meters Customer Service No . Employee FTEs Disposal Lift Stati on s Intercept or Collecti on Coll ecti on and S ervices and Billi ng Admin Tot al 1 Street/Utility Operator 0.25 0 .00% 10 .00% 15.00% 70.00 % 5.00% 0 .00% 0.00 % 0.00 % 100 % 2 Sr. Co llec tion Sys. Op. 1 .00 0.00% 20.00% 10 .00% 60 .00 % 10.00% 0.00% 0 .00 % 0.00 % 100 % 3 Collection Sys. Op. 1.00 0 .00 % 20 .00 % 10.00% 60.00% 10.00% 0 .00 % 0.00% 0.00% 100% 4 Total - FTEs 2.25 0.00 0.43 0 .24 1 .38 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.25 5 Tota l - FTEs 0.00% 18 .89% 10.56 % 61.11% 9.44 % 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00 % 100 .00% (1) Allo cations to fu nca tio nal designation s devel oped based on discus sions with Raftelis, Nelso n Engineering, and Town staff. Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 4 12/13/2021 Town of J ack so n, WY Water and Sewer Fin ancial Plan a nd Rate Study Allocation of O& M Expense Sewe r Utility Line No . Description 1 Treatme nt 2 Interceptor 3 Collection 4 3 Creek Collection 5 Meters & Serv ices 6 Custo mer Service/Utility Billing (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Total V olume BOD TSS TKN $ $ $ $ $ 100 .00% 100.00 % 100.00% 100.00% 100 .00% 100 .00% 30.00% 96 .67 % 25 .00% 25.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 30.00% 30.00% 10.00% (6) (7) (5) FILE: JAWY WW SCHEDULE: COS RANGE: COS_OMALLO (9) (10) Customer Local Collecti on Lines 71.67 % 3 Cre ek Local Coll . Lines 71.67 % Meters and Services 100 .00% 0 .00% ul Custom er Billing/ Customer Ser vice 3.33 % 3.33% 3.33% 0.00% 100.00% 7 Treatment $1,415,263 $424,579 $424,579 $424,579 $141,526 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 8 Interceptor 137,597 133,009 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,589 0 9 Collection 268,410 67,103 0 0 0 192,356 0 0 8,951 0 10 3 Creek Collection 61,304 15,326 0 0 0 0 43,934 0 2,044 0 11 Meters & Services 139,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,468 0 0 12 Customer Service/Utility Billing 139,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,468 13 Total O& M Expens e $2,161,511 $640,016 $424,579 $424,579 $141,526 $192,356 $43,934 $139,468 $15,585 $139,468 14 Perce nt of Total 100.0% 29 .61% 19.64 % 19 .64% 6.55 % 8 .90% 2.03% 6.45% 0.72 % 6.45 % Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 5 12/13/2021 Town of J ack so n, WY Water and Sewer Fin ancial Plan a nd Rate Study Allocation of Adjustments to Revenue Requirement=_ Sewe r Utility FILE: JAWY W1N SCHEDULE: COS RANGE: COS_REV ADJ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (6) (9) (10) Customer Local 3 Cre ek Billing/ Line Collecti on Local Coll . Meters and 111 Customer No . Description Total V olume BOD TSS TKN Lines Lines Services Custom er Ser vice $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1 Interest Income ($126,454) ($37 ,443) ($24,839) ($24,839) ($8,280) ($11,253) (2,570) ($8,159) ($912) ($8,159) 2 Capacity Fee Revenue (236,053) (90,929) (41,260) (41,260) (13,753) (36,714) (10,907) (1,230) 0 0 3 Misc. Revenues (4,427) (1,311) (870) (870) (290) (394) (90) (286) (32) (286) 4 3 Creek Capital Replacement Surcharge (33,998) 0 0 0 0 0 (33,998) 0 0 0 5 Adjustme nt fo r partial yea r rate increases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Net Bo nd / Lo an Procee ds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Incre ase (De crease) in Rese rve s (182,757) (70,400) (31,944) (31,944) (10,648) (28,425) (8,444) (953) 0 0 8 To tal ($583,689) ($200,082) ($98,912) ($98,912) ($32,971) ($76,785) ($56,009) ($10,628) ($944) ($8,445) 9 Weighted Av erage Percent - Adjustment to Revenue Requirements 34.28% 16.95% 16.95% 5.65% 13.16 % 9.60 % 1.82 % 0.16% 1.45% 10 Allocation to Service Categories 11 Interest Income O&M 29 .61% 19 .64% 19 .64% 6.55% 8.90% 2.03% 6.45% 0.72% 6 .45 % 12 Capacity Fee Reve nue Capital 38 .52 % 17 .48 % 17 .48 % 5 .83 % 15.55% 4.62% 0.52% 0 .00 % 0 .00% 13 Misc. Re venue s O&M 29 .61% 19 .64% 19 .64% 6.55% 8.90 % 2.03 % 6.45 % 0.72% 6 .45% 14 3 Creek Capital R eplace me nt Su rcharge 3 Creek Only 0 .00% 0.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% 100 .00 % 0 .00% 0 .00% 0.00% 15 Adjustment for partia l year rate increase s Capital 38.52% 17.48% 17.48% 5 .83% 15 .55 % 4 .62 % 0 .52 % 0.00% 0.00% 16 Net Bond/ Loan Proceeds Capital 38.52 r 17.48% 17.48% 5 .83% 15 .55 % 4 .62 % 0 .52 % 0 .00% 0.00% 17 Increase (Decrease) in Reserves Capital 38.52% 17.48% 17.48% 5 .83% 15 .55% 4 .62% 0 .52% 0 .00% 0.00 % Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 6 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_WW Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: C OS D evelopment of I nfiltrati on / Inflow (1/1) RANGE: COS_FLOW (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) T otal Flow (Billed Bill ed V olume Customer Vol um e Relat ed V ol and Vol um e Tot al Tr eated Line No . Customer Class Accounts (kgal) Related (1) (1) T otal 1/1 Related 1/1) Volume Percent 1/1 1 Residential 2,830 122,656 15,033 14,160 29,194 136,816 151,850 19 .2 % 2 Multi Family 165 53,722 877 6,202 7,079 59,924 60,801 11.6 3 Commercial 769 153,145 4,085 17,680 21,765 170,825 174,910 12.4 % 4 Commercial II 13 88,497 66 10,217 10,283 98,713 98,780 10 .4 5 Commercial 111 8 67,860 40 7,834 7,874 75,694 75,734 10.4% 6 Commercial IV 1 3,765 5 435 440 4,199 4,204 10 .5% 7 Commercial V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Commercial VI 1 732 5 84 90 816 821 10.9% 9 Government 58 19,547 308 2,257 2,565 21,804 22,112 11 .6% 10 Sc hools 21 6,807 112 786 897 7,593 7,704 11.6% 11 3 Creek Ranch 113 11,331 600 1,308 1,908 12,639 13,239 14 .4% 12 3 Creek Ranch Hybrid 6 956 32 110 142 1,066 1,098 13.0% 13 Melody Ranch 356 18,318 1,891 2,115 4,006 20,433 22,324 17.9 % 14 Rafter J 446 46,066 2,369 5,318 7,687 51,384 53,753 14 .3% 15 Wilson 1 22,027 5 2,543 2,548 24,570 24,575 10.4% 16 A irport/GVUD 1 14,778 5 1,706 1,711 16,484 16,489 10.4% 17 Sewer Only 13 5,489 69 634 703 6,123 6,192 11 .3% 18 Saddle Butte 4 119 21 14 35 133 154 22.7% 19 Spring Creek 1 24,831 5 2,867 2,872 27,698 27,703 10 .4% 20 Teton Scien ce School 2 2,103 11 243 253 2,346 2,356 10.8% 21 Indian Springs 2 0 11 0 11 0 11 100 .0% 22 Septic Haulers 2 1,504 0 0 0 1,504 1,504 0.0% 23 Total 4,812 664,251 25,552 76,513 102,065 740,764 766,316 13.3 % 24 To tal 4,812 664,251 25,562 76,687 102,249 740,764 766,500 13.3% (1) 25% of 1/1 assumed to be customer related; 75% assumed to by volume related. Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 7 12/13/2021 Town of J ack son, WY Water and S ew er Fi nancial Plan and Rat e St udy Es timated Units of Service Se we r Utility (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Lin e Fl ow B OD TSS TKN Eq. M eters No. Customer Class Billed Volume 111 Total Strength P ounds Strength P ound s Strength Pounds (Meter Cap.) kgal kgal kg al mg /I Ibs mg / 1 Ib s mg /I Ibs (11) Cu st omer 1/1 kgal FILE: JAWN_/NW SCHEDULE: COS RANGE: COS SERVUNI1S (12) (13) (14) Eq . Meters Eq. Meters Bills (Meter C ap .) (Met er C ost) 1 Residential 122,656 14,160 136,816 225.00 230,164 150 .00 153,443 48 .00 49,102 3,055 15,033 33,960 3,055 2,988 2 M ulti Fa mily 53,722 6,202 59 ,924 225.00 100,809 150.00 67,206 48.00 21,506 506 877 1 ,980 506 406 3 Commercial 153,145 17,680 170,825 225 .00 287,377 150 .00 122,773 48.00 61,307 1,687 4,085 9,228 1,687 1,439 4 Commercial II 88,497 10,217 98,713 400.00 501,051 350.00 89,398 48 .00 35,427 66 150 5 Commercial 111 67,860 7,834 75,694 700.00 269,237 650.00 523,091 48 .00 27,166 40 90 6 Commercial IV 3,765 435 4.199 1 ,000.00 62,792 950.00 0 48.00 1,507 5 12 7 Commercial V 0 0 0 1,300 .00 0 1,250.00 0 48.00 0 0 0 8 Commercial VI 732 84 816 1,600.00 19,522 1,550 .00 0 48 .00 293 5 12 9 Government 19,547 2,257 21,804 225 .00 36,680 150.00 24,453 48.00 7,825 166 308 696 166 136 10 Schools 6,807 786 7593 225.00 12,773 150 .00 8,516 48.00 2,725 99 112 252 90 65 11 3 Cree k Ranch 11,331 1,308 12,639 225.00 21,263 150.00 14,175 48 .00 4,536 281 600 1,356 281 156 12 3 Creek Ranch Hybrid 956 110 1.066 225.00 1,794 150.00 1,106 48 .00 383 15 32 72 15 14 13 Me lody Ranch 18,318 2,115 20,433 225.00 34,374 150 .00 22,916 48.00 7,333 438 1,891 4,272 438 409 14 Ra fter 46,066 5,318 51,384 225 .00 86,443 150.00 57,629 48.00 18,441 446 2,369 5,352 446 446 15 Wilson 22,027 2,543 24,57D 225.00 41,334 150.00 27,556 48 .00 8,818 33 5 12 33 14 16 Airport/GVUD 14 ,778 1,706 16484 225 .00 27,731 150.00 18,487 48.00 5,916 33 5 12 33 14 17 Sewer Only 5,489 634 6,123 225.00 10,300 150 .00 6,867 48.00 2,197 25 69 156 25 35 18 Saddle Butte 119 14 133 225.00 223 150 .00 149 48 .00 48 69 21 48 69 30 19 Spring Creek 24,831 2,867 27,698 225.00 46,595 150.00 31,064 48.00 9,940 11 5 12 11 6 20 Teton Science Sc hoo l 2,103 243 2.346 225 .00 3 ,946 150.00 2,631 48.00 842 18 11 24 18 11 21 Indian Springs 0 0 0 225.00 0 150.00 0 48 .00 0 3 11 24 3 2 22 Septic Haule rs 1,504 0 1 504 6,480.00 81 ,285 13 ,000 .00 163,071 588 .00 7,376 0 24 0 23 To tal 664,251 76,513 740,764 1,875,692 1,334,619 272,687 6,885 25,552 57,744 6,885 6,170 24 To tal 664,251 76,513 740,764 1,875,692 1,334,619 272,687 6,885 25,552 57,744 6,885 6,178 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 8 12/13/2021 Town of J ack so n, WY Water and Sewer Fin ancial Plan a nd Rate Study Development of Unit Costs of Service Sewe r Utility Line No. Description Reve nue Requirements - $ 1 Tre atment 2 Interceptor / Pumping / Lift Stations 3 Collection 4 3 Creek Collection 5 Meters & Services 6 Customer Service/Utility Billing 7 To tal Ope rating Co sts FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: JAWY WW COS COS_ULTUNITS (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Customer Local Loc al Billing/ Collection Collection Meters and I/1 Customer Tot al Fl ow B OD TSS TKN Line s E xlc 3 Cre ek Lin es - 3 Cr eek S ervic es C ustomer Servi ce $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $1,415,263 $424,579 $424,579 $424,579 $141,526 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 137,597 133,009 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,589 0 268,410 67,103 0 0 0 192,356 0 0 8,951 0 61,304 15,326 0 0 0 0 43,934 0 2,044 0 139,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,468 0 0 139,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,468 2,161,511 640,016 424,579 424,579 141,526 192,356 43,934 139,468 15,585 139,468 8 Treatment & Disposal 533,295 159,989 159,989 159,989 53,330 0 0 0 0 0 9 Interceptor / Pumping / Lift Statio ns 192,599 192,599 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Collection Line s - Ex cluding 3 Cre ek 142,361 0 0 0 0 142,361 0 0 0 0 11 Collection Line s - 3 Creek (4) 42,292 0 0 0 0 0 42,292 0 0 0 12 Me te rs & Se rvice s 4,771 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,771 0 0 13 Customer Service/Utility Billing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Miscellaneo us /A dmin 34,736 13,381 6,071 6,071 2,024 5,403 1,605 181 0 0 15 To tal Capital Costs 950,053 365,968 166,060 166,060 55,353 147,763 43,897 4,952 0 0 16 Treatment 1,948,558 584,568 584,568 584,568 194,856 0 0 0 0 0 17 Intercepto r / Pumping / Lift Stations 330,196 325,608 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,589 0 18 Collection 410,771 67,103 0 0 0 334,717 0 0 8,951 0 19 3 Creek Collection 103,596 15,326 0 0 0 0 86,226 0 2,044 0 20 M eters & Services 144,238 0 0 0 0 0 0 144,238 0 0 21 Custo mer Service/Utility Billing 139,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,468 22 Miscellaneous/Admin 34,736 13,381 6,071 6,071 2,024 5,403 1,605 181 0 0 23 To tal Reve nue Require men ts 3,111,564 1, 005, 984 590,639 590 ,639 196,880 340,120 87,831 144,419 15,585 139,468 24 Adjustment to Re venue Requiremen ts (583,689) (200,082) (98,912) (98,912) (32,971) (76,785) (56,009) (10,628) 25 Net Cost of Service $2,527,875 $805,902 $491,727 $491,727 $163,909 $263,334 $31,821 $133,792 $14,641 $131,023 26 Units of Service 740,764 1,875,692 1 ,334,619 272,687 6,589 296 6,170 25,552 57,744 27 Unit Costs of Service $1.088 $0.262 $0.368 $0.601 $39 .964 $107 .508 $21 .684 $0.573 $2.269 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 9 12/13/2021 Town of J ack so n, WY Water and Sewer Fin ancial Plan a nd Rate Study Distribution of Costs to Customer Classes - Inside Town Sewe r Utility (1) Line No. Cus to mer Class Tot al (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: (5) (9) JAWY WW COS COS_CUST_ALLOC1 (10) Customer Local Collection Fl ow B OD TSS TKN Li nes Loc al Collection Lin es - 3 Cr eek Meters and S ervic es I/I C ustomer Billing/ Customer Servi ce 1 Unit Co sts of Service - $/unit Residential 2 Units 3 Cost of Se rvice - $ Comme rcial 4 Units 5 Co st of Service - $ Comme rcial 11 6 Units 7 Cost of Service - $ Co mmerc ial 111 8 Units 9 Cost of Service - $ Commercial IV 10 Units 11 Cost of Service - $ Commercial VI 12 Units 13 Cost of Se rvice - $ Multi Family 14 Units 15 Cost of Se rvice - $ Government 16 Units 17 Co st of Service - $ Schools 18 Units 19 Cost of Se rv ice - $ 20 Total Inside Town - $ $1.088 $487,886 264371 $38.705 $0.262 $0.368 $0.601 $39.964 $107.508 $21.684 $0.573 $2.269 136 ,816 230,164 153 ,443 49,102 3,055 0 2,988 15,033 33,960 $567,788 $148,847 $60,339 $56,534 $29,514 $122,089 $0 $64,793 $8,614 $77,056 170,825 287,377 122,773 61,307 1,687 0 1,439 4,085 9,228 $465,172 $185,847 $75,338 $45,234 $36,851 $67,419 $0 $31,204 $2,341 $20,939 98,713 501,051 89,398 35,427 0 0 0 66 150 $293,358 $107,393 $131,354 $32,938 $21,295 $0 $0 $0 $38 $340 75,694 269,237 523,091 27,166 0 0 0 40 90 $362,215 $82 .350 $70,582 $192,727 $16,329 $0 $0 $0 $23 $204 4,199 62 ,792 0 1,507 0 0 0 5 12 $21,966 $4,568 $16,461 $0 $906 $0 $0 $0 $3 $27 816 19,522 0 293 0 0 0 5 12 $6,212 $888 $5,118 $0 $176 $0 $0 $0 $3 $27 59,924 100,809 67,206 21,506 506 0 406 877 1,980 $163,330 $65,193 $26,428 $24,761 $12,927 $20,222 $0 $8,804 $502 $4,493 21,804 36,680 24,453 7,825 166 0 136 308 696 $58,389 $23,721 $9,616 $9,010 $4,704 $6,634 $0 $2,949 $177 $1,579 7,593 12,773 8,516 2,725 99 0 65 112 252 $22,386 $8,261 $3,349 $3,137 $1,638 $3,956 $0 $1,409 $64 $572 $1,960,817 $627,068 $398,585 $364,342 $124,339 $220,320 $0 $109,160 $11,764 $105,238 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 10 12/13/2021 Town of J ackso n, WY Water and S ew er Fi na nci al Pl an and Rat e St udy Distribution of Costs to Cu stomer Classes - Outsid e Town Sewer Utility (1) (2) (3) Line No. Cus to me r Class Tot al Fl ow B OD (4) TSS (5) TKN (6) (7) FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: (8) (9) J AWY WW COS COS_CUST_ ALLOC2 (10) Customer Local C ollection Li nes L ocal Collection Lin es - 3 Cr eek Meter s and S ervic es 1/1 C ustomer Billing/ Customer Servi ce 1 Unit Costs of Service - $/unit $1 .088 $0 .262 3 Creek Ranch 2 Units 12,639 21,263 3 Cost of Service - $ $64,287 $13,751 $5,574 3 Creek Ranch Hybrid 4 Units 1,066 1,794 5 Cost of Se rvice - $ $4,389 $1,160 $470 Melody Ranc h 6 Units 20,433 34,374 7 Cost of Serv ice - $ $81,242 $22,230 $9,011 Rafter J 8 Units 51,384 86,443 9 Cost of Se rvic e - $ $151,878 $55,903 $22,662 Wilson 10 Units 24,570 41,334 11 Cost of Service - $ $54,683 $26,730 $10,836 Airport/GVUD 12 Units 16,484 27,731 13 Cost of Se rvice - $ $37,234 $17,934 $7,270 Sewer Only 14 Units 6,123 10,300 15 Cost of Service - $ $15,367 $6,661 $2,700 Saddle Butte 16 Units 133 223 17 Cost of Serv ice - $ $3,833 $144 $59 Spring Creek 18 Units 27,698 46,595 19 Cost of Se rvice - $ $60,349 $30,133 $12,215 Teto n Scienc e Scho ol 20 Units 2,346 3,946 21 Cost of Service - $ $6,061 $2,552 $1,035 Indian Springs 22 Units 0 0 23 Cost of Se rvice - $ $220 $0 Septic Haulers 24 Units 1,504 81,285 163,071 7,376 25 Cost of Service - $ $87,516 $1,636 $21,309 $60,082 $0 .368 $0 .601 $39.964 $107.508 $21.684 $0 .573 $2 .269 14,175 4,536 0 281 156 600 1,356 $5,223 $2,727 $0 $30,210 $3,383 $344 $3,077 1,196 383 0 15 14 32 72 $441 $230 $0 $1,612 $294 $18 $163 22,916 7,333 438 0 409 1,891 4,272 $8,443 $4,408 $17,504 $0 $8,869 $1,084 $9,693 57,629 18,441 446 0 446 2,369 5,352 $21,233 $11,085 $17,824 $0 $9,671 $1,358 $12,144 27,556 8,818 33 0 14 5 12 $10,153 $5,300 $1,332 $0 $301 $3 $27 18,487 5,916 33 0 14 5 12 $6,811 $3,556 $1,332 $0 $301 $3 $27 6,867 2,197 25 0 35 69 156 $2,530 $1,321 $1,012 $0 $749 $40 $354 149 48 69 0 30 21 48 $55 $29 $2,771 $0 $655 $12 $109 31 ,064 9,940 11 0 6 5 12 $11,445 $5,975 $426 $0 $124 $3 $27 2,631 842 18 0 11 11 24 $969 $506 $706 $0 $232 $6 $54 0 0 3 0 2 11 24 26 Total Ou tside Town - $ $0 $0 $0 $107 $0 $53 $6 $54 0 0 24 $4,434 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54 $567,058 $178,834 $93,141 $127,384 $39,570 $43,014 $31,821 $24,632 $2,876 $25,785 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 11 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY WW Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: COS Wastewater Cost -of -Service C omparis on R ANGE: COS CO MP (1) (2) (3) 2022 Test Year 2022 Indicated Line Cost of Revenue at Re venue No . Customer Class Service E xisting Rates Increase 1 Residential 567,788 528,254 7% 2 Multi Family 163,330 152,930 7% 3 Commercial 1,234,087 1,098,407 12% 4 3 Creek Ranch 64,287 91,121 -29% 5 Full Service 254,767 270,936 -6% 6 Wholesale 156,100 144,180 8% 7 Septage Haulers 87,516 112,744 -22 % 8 Total 2,527,875 2,398,572 5% Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 12 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: JAWY_WW Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: COS System Line Feet by Diameter Size R ANGE: COS_LINESIZE Sewer Utility System 3 Creek Only Pressure Total Gra vity 3 Creek Pressure T otal Diameter Pipe Length Pipe Length Pipe Length Pipe Length Pipe Length Pipe Length Pipe Length Pipe Length (Inches) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Inch -Feet Inch -Feet Inch -Feet Inch -Feet Percent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 2 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 % 4 1,014 0 1,014 0 4,056 0 4,056 0 .12 % 6 0 17,800 0 17,800 0 106,800 0 106,800 3 .09% 8 201,463 12,629 0 214,092 1,611,703 101,032 0 1,712,735 49.57% 10 9,388 9,388 93,880 0 0 93,880 2 .72% 12 6,554 6,554 78,648 0 0 78,648 2.28 % 14 3,750 3,750 52,500 0 0 52,500 1 .52 % 15 13,866 13,866 207,990 0 0 207,990 6 .02% 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 18 9,360 9,360 168,480 0 0 168,480 4 .88% 20 2,695 2,695 53,900 0 0 53,900 1.56% 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 % 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 % 24 9,168 9,168 220,032 0 0 220,032 6.37% 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00% 30 25,215 25,215 756,450 0 0 756,450 21.89% 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 % 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00 % 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00% 54 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 .00% To tal Accounts Foot per Account 3 Creek to Town 281,459 31,443 0 312,902 3,243,583 211,888 0 3,455,471 100 .00% 4,697 113 0 4,810 6,589 281 6,870 59.9 278. 3 65. 1 492 .2 754 .0 503 .0 4.6 1.5 Collection - Outside of 3 Creek Less Than 10" 1,611,703 43 .95% Collection - 3 Cree k Less Tha n 10" 211,888 5 .78% Interceptor 10" and Greater 1,843,768 50 .28% 3,667,359 100 .00% Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 13 12/13/2021 Town of Jack son, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rat e Study WWTP Plant L oadings Sewer Utility FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: JAWY_WW COS WWTPHIST Line No. Annual Average - mg/L Influent Loadings - Ibs/day Influent L oadings - Ibs/yr Year Flow - MGD B OD TSS TKN BOD TSS TKN B OD TSS TKN 1 CY 2017 2.19 2 CY2018 2 .19 3 CY 2019 2.04 4 Us e 2 .10 Avg. CY 2018 & CY 2019 2.12 Source: W WTP Data pro vide d by Town staff and Nelso n Engineering . 281 156 34 5,122 2,846 613 282 201 39 5,142 3,662 716 312 202 41 5,323 3,437 704 290 200 40 5,079.06 3,502 .80 700.56 Avg. CY 2018 & CY 2019j. CY 2018 & CY 2019 CY 2018 & CY 2019 291 .50 186.05 38 .03 1,869,630 1,876,815 1,942,988 1,853,857 1,038, 930 1,336, 784 1,254,487 1,278, 522 223,778 261,251 256,889 255,704 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 14 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY FILE: J AWY_WW Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study SCHEDULE: Assets Wastewater System Asset Summary RANGE: ASSET SUM Assets as of 6/30/2019 Function Code Functional Category Asset Count Original Cost 1 Land 0 $0 2 Pumping / Lift Stations 8 1,924,835 3 Collection & Interceptors 85 10,216,605 4 WW - Miscellaneous / Admin 25 1,001,982 5 WW - Vehicles 14 424,999 6 WW - Treatment and Disposal 30 22,583,483 7 Meters / Metering 3 192,646 10 3 Creek Only Facilities 1 1,798,273 11 Total 166 $38,142,822 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 15 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Wastewater As sets as of 6/30/2019 (From Town) Line N Functio n De cnp n Fun ti crip7 1 e Aeq� ed Ye ar Ass. t Cost Subsidi ary D eprecia U sef ul e Life] Metht Accumulated N et Book iI Cast D enreci aban . Val ue WW - Treatment and Disposal 2 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 3 WW - Misce llaneous / Admin 4 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 5 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 6 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 7 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 8 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 9 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 10 Collection & Interce pto rs 11 WW - Misce llan eo us / Admin 12 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 13 WW - Misc ellane ous /Admin 14 WW - Misce llaneo us /Admin 15 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 16 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 17 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 18 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 19 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 20 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 21 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 22 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 23 WW - Misc ellane ous / Admin 24 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 25 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 26 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 27 Meters / Metering 28 WW - Vehicles 29 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 30 Pumping / Lift Sta tio ns 31 WW - Misc ellaneo us / Admin 32 WW - Vehicles 33 WW - Vehicles 34 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 35 WW - Misce llan eo us / Admin 36 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 37 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 38 WW - Vehicles 39 WW - Vehicles 40 Meters / Metering 41 Meters / Metering 42 Pumping / Lift Stations 43 WW - Vehicles 44 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 45 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 6 EQUIP MENT/PLANT 6 BUILDINGS, FENCES 4 PUBLIC WORKS BLDG EXPANSION 6 WWTP RECONSTRUCTION 4 ELECTRICAL - BUILDING 6 WWTP EQUIPMENT STORAGE 4 PW BLDG EXPANSION (1/3) 6 DESIGN OF WWTP STORAGE BLDG 6 RAIN GUTTER - WWTP 3 SANITATION SEWER REHAB 4 PUBLIC WORKS EXPENSION(50%) 6 WWTP STORAGE BUILDING 4 EQUIPMENT STORAGE CANOPY(33 %) 4 BACKUP GENERATOR (33%) 4 STORAGE-PW-2ND FLOOR (33 %) 6 WWTP STORAGE BUILDING 4 EQUIPM ENT STORAGE CANOPY 6 Sewer Plant Aeroaters 6 ENERGY UPGRADES - SEWER PLANT 4 ENERGY UPGRADES -SCADA 6 ENERGY UPGRADES - SEWER PLANT 6 ENERGY UPGRA DES - SEWR PLANT 4 64 KW PV Solor System Bldg 6 WWTP Electrical Upgrades 4 MAP INFO SOFTWARE (50%) 4 CASELLE FINANICAL SOFTWARE 7 WATER METERING - RADIO (50% ) 5 SOFTWARE - FLEET MANAGEMENT 4 Software- Civil 3D 2 PUMPS & WELDER 4 SEWER M AINTENANCE EQUIP 5 FRONT END LOADER 5 BOAT TRAILER 4 HOT WATER PRESSURE WASHER 4 ROOF DE-ICING SYSTEM 4 EMERGENCY GENERATOR 6600 WAT 4 GENERATOR - HONDA 5 TRAILER-WALTON SKID STEER(. 125 5 2002 CAT LOADER (33%) 7 GAS MONITORING METER 7 ELECTRONIC WATER METERING BOX 2 FOUR POST LIFT SYSTEM (25%0 5 LOADER REPLACEMENT TIRES 6 BAR SCREEN/COMPUTER UPGRADE 6 BAR SCREEN/COMPUTER UPGRADE 06/30/1982 06/30/1980 12/31/1999 06/13/2000 11/18/1999 12/30/1999 06/30/2001 07/01/2000 01/31/2001 01/01/2001 01/01/2002 06/12/2002 05/01/2003 03/31/2003 09/01/2002 12/31/2002 01/05/2004 01/01/2009 06/30/2010 06/30/2011 06/30/2011 05/01/2012 01/01/2015 01/01/2015 06/30/1999 07/01/1999 10/01/2001 05/22/2003 09/18/2007 06/30/1989 06/30/1990 06/30/1997 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 09/21/1999 09/13/1999 05/17/2001 12/01/2000 02/22/2002 01/31/2002 08/31/2002 08/11/2003 07/13/2004 06/01/2006 01/01/2007 1982 1980 1999 2000 1999 1999 2001 2000 2001 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2002 2002 2004 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2015 2015 1999 1999 2001 2003 2007 1989 1990 1997 1998 1998 1999 1999 2001 2000 2002 2002 2002 2003 2004 2006 2007 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 3 Straight line 5 Straight line 20 Straight line 8 Straight line 5 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 25 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 10 Straight line 20 Straight line 8 Straight line 4 Straight line 15 Straight line 30 Straight line $741,000 248,893 8,862 2,622 1,241 15,260 49,544 249 3,362 412,455 184,043 124,266 4,735 18,418 19,579 78,172 11,543 1,580 126,207 200,505 1,429,603 376,005 100,000 500,016 6,250 6,330 58,760 3,847 8,441 4,484 6,960 121,040 595 5,090 4,200 1,749 1,080 700 47,333 5,550 128,336 7,728 3,099 67,003 31,115 $681,720 228,974 5,168 1,665 811 8,674 28,894 142 2,064 254,291 107,333 70,633 2,552 9,977 10,984 42,991 5,970 378 30,151 47,901 341,538 89,829 14,986 74,934 6,250 6,330 52,143 3,847 8,441 4,484 6,960 121,040 595 5,090 3,322 1,749 1,080 700 47,333 5,550 108,013 7,728 3,100 58,436 12,960 $59,280 19,919 3,694 957 429 6,586 20,650 107 1,298 158,164 76,710 53,633 2,183 8,440 8,595 35,181 5,573 1,203 96,056 152,603 1,088,065 286,176 85,014 425,082 0 0 6,616 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 878 0 0 0 0 0 20,323 (0) (1) 8,567 18,155 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 16 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Wastewater As sets as of 6/30/2019 (From Town) Line N Functio n De cnp n Fun ti crip7 1 e Aeq� ed Ye ar Ass. t Cost Subsidi ary D epreciti U sef ut e Life] Metht Accumulated N et Book iI Cast D enreci aban . Val ue 46 Collection & Interceptors 47 WW - Vehicles 48 Collectio n & Interceptors 49 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 50 WW - V ehicles 51 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 52 WW - Vehicles 53 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 54 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 55 Pumping / Lift Stations 56 Collectio n & Interceptors 57 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 58 Collectio n & Interceptors 59 Collectio n & Interceptors 60 Collectio n & Interceptors 61 Collectio n & Interceptors 62 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 63 Collectio n & Interceptors 64 Collectio n & Interceptors 65 Collectio n & Interceptors 66 Collectio n & Interceptors 67 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 68 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 69 Collectio n & Interceptors 70 Collectio n & Interceptors 71 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 72 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 73 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 74 WW - Miscellane ous / Admin 75 Co llection & Interceptors 76 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 77 Collectio n & Interceptors 78 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 79 Collectio n & Interceptors 80 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 81 Collectio n & Interceptors 82 Collectio n & Interceptors 83 Collectio n & Interceptors 84 Collectio n & Interceptors 85 Collectio n & Interceptors 86 Pumping / Lift Stations 87 Collectio n & Interceptors 88 Collectio n & Interceptors 89 Collectio n & Interceptors 90 Collectio n & Interceptors 3 SEWER CAMERA 5 TRUCI<- SEWERPLANT 3 SEWER JETTER CHASSIS 6 WWTP Heaters 5 2015 Ranger P olaris ATV 6 Solarbee Mixer Upgrades 5 420F2 4XG Cat erpillar 6 Bar Screen Rebuild 6 Ultra Viol et System Upgrad es 2 INTER MEDIATE PUMPING STATION 3 SEWER INTERCEPTOR 6 SEWAGE TREAT MENT PLANT 3 SEWER INTERCEPTOR -IA & IIA 3 STREET IMPROVE MENTS 3 SEWER LINE 3 SEWER LINE -IMPROVEMENTS 6 SEWER PLANT -IMPROVEMENTS 3 SEWER 3 SEWER SYSTEM REHABILITATION 3 SEWER SYSTEM REHABILITATION 3 GREGORY LANE SEWER LINE 6 SEWER PLANT DESIGN 4 GIS-PUBLIC WORKS 3 SEWER LINES 3 GREGORY LANE SEWER LINE 4 GIS-PUBLIC WORKS 6 SEWER PLANT DESIGN 4 GEOGRAPHICAL INFO SYSTEM 4 MISC. SEWER PROJECTS 3 GLENWOOD/HANSEN/SIM PSON 4 GEOGRAPHICAL INFO SYSTEM 3 ANNUAL SEWER PROJECTS 4 PONTOON SUPPORTS 3 SEWER REHAB DESIGN 6 WASTEWATER PLANT DESIGN 3 ANNUAL SEWER PROJECT 3 SNOW KING ESTATES 3 EAST JACKSON SEWER REHAB #1 3 SEWER REHAB PHASE II ENGIN 3 SEWER BACKFLOW PREVENTION 2 BERGER LANE LIFT STATION 3 EAST JACKSON SEWER REHAB #1 3 SEWER REHAB PHASE II ENGIN. 3 SEWER COLLECT REHAB PHASE II 3 GREGORY LANE CLEANUP 06/23/2010 01/01/2012 05/23/2012 01/01/2015 08/28/2014 07/10/2015 01/16/2018 10/31/2018 11/16/2018 10/31/2018 06/30/1980 06/30/1980 06/30/1982 06/30/1982 06/30/1983 06/30/1989 06/30/1989 06/30/1989 06/30/1990 06/30/1992 06/30/1992 06/30/1992 06/30/1992 06/30/1993 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1994 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1996 06/30/1996 06/30/1996 06/30/1996 06/30/1996 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 2010 2012 2012 2015 2014 2015 2018 2018 2018 2018 1980 1980 1982 1982 1983 1989 1989 1989 1990 1992 1992 1992 1992 1993 1994 1994 1994 1994 1994 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1995 1996 1996 1996 1996 1996 1997 1997 1997 1997 1997 10 Straight line 8 Straight line 10 Straight line 8 Straight line 8 Straight line 10 Straight line 15 Straight line 15 Straight line 20 Straight line 20 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 48,807 23,423 271,734 8,674 14,610 564,563 63,433 57,852 636,762 14,545 1,688,330 2,501,043 1,028,295 7,990 7,400 15,934 11,171 465 58,162 365,017 51,017 52,568 56,961 6,210 3,020 5,295 72,222 20,800 700 50,000 6,867 4,547 781 25,134 546,398 6,546 2,490 377,967 52,652 2,843 39,066 1,844 1,284 437,112 19,571 44,033 21,955 193,117 4,875 8,841 224,588 6,152 2,568 19,801 484 1,553,264 2,300,960 804,884 5,418 5,114 8,462 5,932 244 29,837 180,682 26,987 27,807 30,131 4,614 1,539 2,701 36,832 10,608 357 24,500 3,365 2,228 383 12,316 267,735 3,076 1,171 177,645 24,747 1,336 17,580 830 578 196,700 8,807 4,774 1,468 78,617 3,799 5,769 339,975 57,281 55,284 616,961 14,061 135,066 200,083 223,411 2,572 2,286 7,472 5,239 221 28,325 184,335 24,030 24,761 26,830 1,596 1,481 2,594 35,390 10,192 343 25,500 3,502 2,319 398 12,818 278,663 3,470 1,319 200,322 27,905 1,507 21,486 1,014 706 240,412 10,764 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 17 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Wastewater As sets as of 6/30/2019 (From Town) Line N Functio n De cnp n Fun ti crip7 1 e Aeq� ed Ye ar Ass. t Cost Subsidi ary D epreciti U sef ul e Life] Metht Accumulated N et Book iI Cast D enreci aban . Val ue 91 Collection & Interceptors 92 Collection & Interceptors 93 Collectio n & Interceptors 94 Collectio n & Interceptors 95 WW - Trea tment and Disposal 96 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 97 Collectio n & Interceptors 98 Collectio n & Interceptors 99 Collectio n & Interceptors 100 Collectio n & Interceptors 101 Collectio n & Interceptors 102 Collectio n & Interceptors 103 Collectio n & Interceptors 104 Collectio n & Interceptors 105 Collectio n & Interceptors 106 Collectio n & Interceptors 107 Collectio n & Interceptors 108 Collectio n & Interceptors 109 Collectio n & Interceptors 110 Collectio n & Interceptors 111 Collectio n & Interceptors 112 Collectio n & Interceptors 113 Collectio n & Interceptors 114 Collectio n & Interceptors 115 Collectio n & Interceptors 116 Collectio n & Interceptors 117 Collectio n & Interceptors 118 Collectio n & Interceptors 119 Collection & Interce pto rs 120 Co llection & Interceptors 121 Pumping / Lift Stations 122 Collectio n & Interceptors 123 Collectio n & Interceptors 124 WW - Misce llaneo us / Admin 125 Collectio n & Interceptors 126 Collectio n & Interceptors 127 Pumping / Lift Stations 128 Collectio n & Interceptors 129 Collectio n & Interceptors 130 Pumping / Lift Stations 131 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 132 Collectio n & Interceptors 133 Collectio n & Interceptors 134 Collectio n & Interceptors 135 Collectio n & Interceptors 3 ANNUAL SEWER 3 ANNUAL SEWER 3 RIDGE SEWER WATER PROJECT 3 SEWER COLLECT PHASE IIA 6 SEWER PLANT RECONSTRUCTION 6 WWTP RECONSTRUCTION 3 ANNUAL SEWER 3 SEWER COLLECT PHASE III 3 RIDGE SEWER PROJECT 3 COLLECT PHASE IIA 3 SEWER LINES 3 KELLY AVENUE REALIGNMENT (/12) 3 EJACKSON RECONSTRUCTION 3 GROS VENTRE DRIVE INTERSECTIO 3 KELLY AVE REALIGN MENT -PHASE I 3 GROS VENTRE DRIVE INTERSECTIO 3 SANITARY SEWER REHAB 3 KELLY AVENUE REALIGN MENT 3 ANNUAL SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEM 3 SPRUCE DRIVE 3 ANNUAL SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 3 NELSON DRIVE - SEWER 3 NELSON DRIVE CONSTRUCTION 3 KARNS ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS 3 PINE DRIVE IMPROVEM ENTS 3 KARNS ALLEY 3 PINE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 3 GILL ADDITION IMPROVEMENTS 3 PINE DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS 3 GILL ADDITION 2 COTTONWOOD PARK LIFTSTATIN 3 JACKSON DRUG SEWER PROJECT 3 Ele men tary School Line 4 Photo Voltaic System 3 Alley Se wer Lines 3 Gill Addition Sewer Lines 2 Co ttonwo od park Lift Station 3 ELEMENTRY SCHOOL SEWER LINE 3 ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS 2 COTTONWOOD LIFT STATION 6 TREATMENT PLANT PHOTO VOLTAIC 3 BROADWAY AND PEARL ALLEY 3 PEARL AND SIMPSON 3 SIMPSON & HANSEN 3 HANSEN AND KELLY ALLEY SEWER 06/30/1997 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 06/30/1998 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 01/12/2000 06/30/2000 04/21/2001 04/16/2001 03/01/2001 12/24/2001 12/21/2001 08/15/2001 11/09/2001 08/23/2002 12/31/2002 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 06/30/2006 01/01/2006 01/01/2007 01/01/2009 11/30/2007 01/01/2009 06/01/2008 11/30/2007 06/30/2009 06/30/2009 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 09/15/2009 09/30/2009 09/30/2009 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 1997 1998 1998 1998 1998 1999 1999 1999 1999 1999 2000 2000 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 2009 2007 2009 2008 2007 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 1,887 10,554 6,617 360,699 12,155, 064 37,330 6,409 283,896 43,900 70,598 305,475 2,141 7,122 11,258 3,693 205,400 1,636 74,310 41,100 209,324 245,815 154,219 8,844 294,461 191,448 70,882 308,552 117,866 11,170 407,321 37,332 50,128 356 272,010 41,042 313,243 523,210 80,726 221,742 127,575 528,809 642 454 232 441 849 4,539 2,846 155,101 5,223,122 15,305 2,628 116,397 17,999 28,945 118,935 1,276 4,319 6,833 2,093 119,939 549 44,281 24,168 70,562 81,112 44,711 4,273 142,283 44,363 31,887 71,500 24,742 2,588 85,504 7,370 11,616 70 46,234 7,867 65,755 103,295 15,809 43,243 24,879 92,549 109 77 39 75 1,038 6,015 3,771 205,598 6,931,942 22,025 3,781 167,499 25,901 41,653 186,540 865 2,802 4,425 1,601 85,461 1,087 30,029 16,932 138,762 164,703 109,508 4,571 152,179 147,084 38,995 237,053 93,124 8,582 321,817 29,961 38,512 287 225,775 33,176 247,488 419,916 64,917 178,499 102,696 436,260 532 377 192 366 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 18 12/13/2021 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Wastewater As sets as of 6/30/2019 (From Town) Line N Functio n De cnp n Fun ti crip7 1 e Aeq� ed Ye ar Ass. t Cost Subsidi U sef ul e Life] D epreciti Nletht Accumulated N et Book iI Cast D epreci ation . Val ue 136 Collection & Interceptors 137 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 138 Collectio n & Interceptors 139 Collectio n & Interceptors 140 Collection & Interceptors 141 Collectio n & Interceptors 142 Collectio n & Interceptors 143 Collectio n & Interceptors 144 Collectio n & Interceptors 145 Collectio n & Interceptors 146 Collectio n & Interceptors 147 Collectio n & Interceptors 148 Collectio n & Interceptors 149 Collectio n & Interceptors 150 Collectio n & Interceptors 151 Collectio n & Interceptors 152 Collectio n & Interceptors 153 Collectio n & Interceptors 154 Collectio n & Interceptors 155 Collectio n & Interceptors 156 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 157 Collectio n & Interceptors 158 Pumping / Lift Stations 159 WW - Tre atment and Disposal 160 WW - Vehicles 161 WW - Vehicles 162 WW - Vehicles 163 WW - Vehicles 164 Collection & Interce pto rs 165 WW - Ve hicles 166 3 REDMOND STREET 6 TREAT MENT PLANT PHOTOVOLTAIC 3 BROADWAY AND PEARL ALLEY 3 SIMPSON & HANSEN SEWER 3 HANSEN & KELLEY ALLEY SEWER 3 REDMOND STREET SEWER 3 REDMOND STREET IMPROVMENTS 3 MILLWARD & GLENWOOD 3 SCOTT LANE 3 MILLWARD & GLENWOOD MAIN 3 SCOTT LANE MAIN 3 New Main Budge Drive 3 CACHE CREEK/LODGE POLE SEWER 3 390 LF Teton Meadow Sewer Impr ovem 3 610 LF E Broadway Sewer Improvement 3 500 LF No Name Sewer Improvement 3 450 LF Sto rmy Circle Sewer Impr oveme 3 1060 LF TOJ Yard/Snow King Ave Sewe 3 Highway 22 (we stview Townhomes) 3 1005 LF SM ITH/SIM ON/MAPLE 6 WWTP SHARED SOLAR PANELS 3 CONCRETE WET WELL LINING 2 SPRING GULCH LIFT STATION 6 LAND 5 GMC 2T W/SEWER JETCAM VAN 5 2016 GMC SIERRA 5 2017 WHITE CHEVY SILVERADO 5 2018 CHEVY COLORADO 3 GM C Camera Van & Video Equipment 5 2019 CHEVY BOLT WHITE Total 06/30/2010 09/30/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2010 06/30/2011 05/01/2012 06/30/2012 06/30/2012 01/01/2013 01/01/2013 01/01/2015 10/31/2016 12/06/2017 12/13/2017 12/13/2017 12/13/2017 08/11/2017 06/30/2018 06/30/2018 04/26/2019 05/09/2019 07/26/2018 06/30/1999 06/30/1972 05/13/2016 02/24/2017 11/15/2017 03/15/2019 05/09/2019 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2015 2016 2017 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 2018 1999 1972 2016 2017 2017 2019 2019 30 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 30 Straight line 20 Straight line 50 Straight line 50 Straight line 0 Straight line 10 Straight line 8 Straight line 12 Straight line 12 Straight line 15 Straight line 7 Straight line 198 329,064 128,667 89,587 87,247 3,639 72,800 125,846 147,743 68,453 73,049 27,201 572,639 87,704 150,151 94,256 94,692 301,241 210,561 285,000 364,610 149,774 1,170, 896 972,000 2,800 34,246 36,757 38,374 131,999 34,742 47 57,591 21,870 15,227 14,830 869 17,392 27,249 31,991 14,822 15,817 4,076 50,884 4,581 7,748 4,863 4,886 18,955 7,019 9,500 3,296 435 21,814 0 2,800 13,417 7,192 5,195 2,604 721 151 271,473 106,797 74,359 72,417 2,770 55,408 98,597 115,752 53,631 57,232 23,124 521,755 83,123 142,404 89,393 89,806 282,286 203,542 275,500 361,314 149,339 1,149,082 972,000 0 20,829 29,565 33,178 129,395 34,022 165 $38,142,822 $16,133,824 $22,008,998 Prepare d by Rafte lis Page G - 19 12/13/2021 D i ) "'11"" 4") 4P" IIg4 ()II"' ,4 11 3 (,)114 „ 'u" IIA II ' II„, II'ii?, II -11 11::::::„ IIgN :k: II 'V II 44 B 64, II Viii?, II II IINI D a S II Pi? II . II„, II:Z II II 'ii,'. A. IION II4 f,'::::: A IP A i II II I L'', 11''. s II 4.11 I0 ""4' Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates Residential FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_SFR Residen tial - Total Class C ost of Service $567,788 M eter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Units Monthly Charge 2,566 241 18 5 1 0 0 0 2,831 $11 .55 14 .61 23 .61 31 .64 53 .34 81 .02 146 .34 224 .97 Reven ue $355,648 42,252 5,100 1,898 640 0 0 0 $405,538 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $162,250 Block Minimum Revenue (Surplus)/Deficiency Block Ending Volume in Block Volume 2,000 46. 7% 57,280 Over 2,000 53. 3% 65,376 100. 00% 122,656 Cumulative Factor 1 .00 Rate $2 .27 $0 .00 $2 .27 Re venue $0 148,403 $148,403 ($13,847) Page H - 1 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates Mu lti Family FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_MFR M ulti -Family - Total Class Cost of Service $163,330 M eter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Units Monthly Charge 51 37 28 44 3 2 0 0 165 $11 .55 14 .61 23 .61 31 .64 53 .34 81 .02 146 .34 224 .97 Reven ue $7,069 6,487 7,933 16,706 1,920 1,944 0 0 $42,059 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $121,271 Block M inimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 5.8% 94. 2% Volume 3,125 Cumulative Factor 1.00 50,597 1 .00 100. 00% 53,722 Rate $0.00 $2 .27 114,856 Revenue $0 $114,856 ($6,415) Page H - 2 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Fin ancial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates Commercial FILE: SCHEDULE: RANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_COM Commercial - Total Cl ass Co st of S er vice $1,211,701 Meter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Surcharge Flow Rate BOD Surcharge TSS Surcharge Units Monthly Charg e 461 $11.55 163 14.61 124 23.61 80 31 .64 14 53.34 8 81 .02 0 146.34 0 224.97 850 160,852 852,602 612,489 pounds pounds $1.09 $0 .26 $0 .37 Revenue $63,895 28,577 35,132 30,374 8,961 7,778 0 0 $174,717 175,329 223,516 225,665 Remainder Recovere d fro m Vo lume Rate $1,036,984 Blo ck M inimum Class II Class III Class IV Class V Class VI Rev enue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block Volume 4. 8% 8,331 95. 2% Cumulati ve Fact or 164,361 1.00 100. 00% 172,692 88,497 67,860 3,765 732 160,852 Rate $0 .00 $2 .27 373,098 Re venue $0 $373,098 3.27 $289,384 4 .85 329,119 6.43 24,206 8 .00 0 9 .58 7,008 649,716 ($14,170) Page H - 3 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates School FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_SCH School - Total Class C ost of Service $22,386 M eter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Units Monthly Charge 7 4 3 1 5 1 0 21 $11 .55 14 .61 23 .61 31 .64 53 .34 81 .02 146 .34 224 .97 Reven ue $970 701 850 380 3,200 972 0 0 $7,074 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $15,312 Block M inimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 5.3% Volume 362 Cumulative Factor 1.00 Rate $0.00 94. 7% 6,445 1 .00 $2 .27 100. 00% 6,807 Revenue $0 14,630 $14,630 ($682) Page H - 4 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates 3 Creek FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_3CR 3 Creek - Total Class C ost of Service $64,287 M eter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Units Monthly Charge 12 39 56 1 0 0 0 0 108 $17 .75 22 .45 36 .28 48 .62 81 .97 124 .51 224 .89 345 .73 Reven ue $2,556 10,507 24,380 583 0 0 0 $38,026 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $26,261 Block M inimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 12.3% 87. 7% Volume 1,516 Cumulative Factor 1.00 10,771 1 .00 100. 00% 12,287 Rate $0.00 2 .27 Revenue $0 24,449 $1 .99 $24,449 $1,812 Page H - 5 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates Indiv idually Metered C ontract (Melody Ran ch, Sewer Only, Teton Science School) FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_I MC Ind. M etered Contract - T otal Class Cost of Service $102,669 M eter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Units Monthly Charge 260 125 3 4 0 0 1 0 393 $11 .55 14 .61 23 .61 31 .64 53 .34 81 .02 146 .34 224 .97 Reven ue $36,036 21,915 850 1,519 0 0 1,756 0 $62,076 Remainder Recovered from Volume Rate $40,593 Block M inimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 46.7% Volume 12,100 53. 3% 13,810 100. 00% 25,910 Cumulative Factor 1.00 Rate $0.00 1 .00 $2 .27 Revenue $0 31,349 $31,349 ($9,244) Page H - 6 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Financial Plan and Rate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates Master Billed (Rafter J, Wils on, Airp ort/GVUD, Spring Creek, Saddle Butte) FILE: SCHEDULE: R ANGE: JAWY_WW Alt 1 WWRD1_ MMC M aster M etered Contract - T otal Class Cost of Service $308,198 M eter Sizes 3/4 - Inch 1 - Inch 1-1/2 - Inch 2 - Inch 3 - Inch 4 - Inch 6 - Inch 8 - Inch Units Monthly Charge 447 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 453 $11 .55 14 .61 23 .61 31 .64 53 .34 81 .02 146 .34 224 .97 Reven ue $61,954 175 0 0 640 0 7,024 0 $69,794 Remainder Reco vered fro m Volume Rate $238,404 Blo ck Minimum Revenue Surplus/(Deficiency) Block Ending 2,000 Over 2,000 Volume in Block 0. 0% 100. 0% V olume 0 Cumulative Factor 1 .00 107,821 1 .00 100. 00% 107,821 Rate $0 .00 $2 .27 244,754 Revenue $0 $244,754 $6,350 Page H - 7 Town of Jackson, WY Water and Sewer Finan cial Plan and R ate Study Proposed Wastewater Rates Summary of Co st of Service vs . Adopt ed Line No. Customer Class FILE: JAWY_W SCHEDULE: Alt 1 RANGE: WWRD1 SUM 2022 Test Year 2022 Test Year 2022 Test Year 2022 Cost of Bas e Charge Volume R evenu e Service Revenue Revenue Under Proposed Difference 1 Residential $567,788 $405,538 $148,403 $553,941 -2 % 2 Comme rcial 1,211,701 174,717 1,022,814 1,197,531 -1 % 3 Multi Family 163,330 42,059 114,856 156,915 -4% 4 School 22,386 7,074 14,630 21,704 -3% 5 3 Creek Ranch 64,287 38,026 24,449 62,476 -3% 6 Individually Metered Contract (Melody Ranch, Sewer Only, Teton Science School) 102,669 62,076 31,349 93,425 -9% 7 Master Billed (Rafte r J, Wilso n, Airport/GVUD, Spring Creek, Saddl e Butte) 308,198 69,794 244,754 314,548 2% 8 Septic Haulers 87,516 0 122,892 122,892 40% 9 Total 2,527,875 799,284 1,724,146 2,523,430 0% Page H - 8 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Auurg „,1101u1"'41 u11'1 I 1Idiuiihnnuuimmml ui mm: 111 Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees Paul Johnson, Public Works Director May 3, 2023 2023 Construction Management and Inspection Services MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Consideration of Merrick proposal for 2023 Construction Management & Inspection Services. BACKGROUND: Merrick & Company (Merrick) has provided this service throughout the 2022 calendar year to provide project management for the three Town Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) and Construction Inspection services for development. This agreement continues these services through the from April 15th through December 31St of 2023. BUDGET: Construction Management of Capital Improvement Projects are included in the current approved budget. Construction Inspections for development costs are the previously approved rates included in the Master Agreement for Professional Services. Development costs are then passed through to the developer per the Subdivision Improvement Agreements as applicable. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Trustees grant the Town Manager the authority to sign the Merrick Construction Management and Inspection Services contract. APPENDIXES: Proposal for 2023 Construction Management & Inspection Services.pdf TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2023-05-02 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE 2023 CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MERRICK & COMPANY WHEREAS, the attached agreement contracts Merrick & Company to provide Construction Management and Construction Inspection services for the Town. HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1. The Town Manager is authorized to sign the attached Proposal for 2023 Construction Management and Inspection Services. READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES THIS 5t1_DAY OF MAY 2023. Votes in favor: Votes opposed: Abstained: (S E A L) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO BY: Mayor ATTEST: Town Clerk or°a MERRICK® 000 March 20, 2023 Michael Brack Town Manager Town of Fraser 153 Fraser Avenue, P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 80442 Email: mbrack@towmfiraserco.us RE: PROPOSAL FOR 2023 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES Dear Mr. Brack: Merrick & Company is pleased to present this proposal for construction administration services to the Town of Fraser for the 2023 construction season that includes Byers Avenue Water Line project (Byers), Sanitary Sewer Upgrades project (Sewer), and General Inspections. This proposal is intended to cover Town of Fraser needs and efforts as described below for the period from April 15 to December 31, 2023. During the Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for Byers, the fee for Engineering Service During Construction was estimated to be $140,000 and for the Sewer, Town contingency was earmarked to cover these services. Our proposed scope of services is described below. Task 1— Project Management This work will include project administration for preparation of monthly invoices and reports. Quality control review for the 2023 Construction Management and Inspection Services will be performed by a senior project manager as needed. Task 2 — Pre -Construction Phase Services This work will include pre -construction activities for the Byers and Sewer projects. One onsite pre - construction meeting will be held for each of the two projects addressing, among other items, logistical, staging, phasing, and public impacts and that will include preparation of a meeting agenda, meeting attendance, and meeting minutes. Merrick will review shop drawings/submittals for both projects assuming fifteen remaining (after April 15) submittals for each project that will take an average of three hours each to review/comment. Merrick will review and respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) for both projects assuming ten RFIs for each project that will take an average of two hours each to review/comment. Employee Owned hello@merrick.com www.merrick.com Task 3 — Construction Administration Services This work will include construction administration activities for the two projects and General Town of Fraser Inspections. Weekly inspection effort for the projects is based on a 12- and 16 -week project duration for Byers and Sewer, respectively, with the assumption that the projects will be running concurrently. Projected effort equates to 9 hours per week for each project (18 hours total), and includes travel, site inspection time, weekly construction meetings (agenda, meeting time and meeting minutes), daily observation reports, pay application review and change order administration. The direct cost for Construction Administration includes travel, lodging and meals. Travel is based on round trip travel from Merrick's Loveland Colorado office to Fraser for the 16 -week construction period at current GSA milage rate. Lodging per diem is based on GSA 2023 rate plus fees/taxes (this is an estimated cost which may change based on demand, lodging will be billed at cost). Meals per diem is based on 2023 GSA costs plus taxes, not to exceed this estimate and billed at cost. The general intent and assumption are for inspections to occur over two days each week while the Byers and Sewer projects are in progress. General inspections (Task 5) will also occur during this weekly two-day period, as needed. Task 4 — Post Construction Phase Services This work will include post construction activities for Byers and the Sewer projects. Substantial and final completion punch list walkthroughs will be held for each project, concurrently if possible, and will include a site meeting and generation of a report. Merrick is assuming that direct costs (i.e., travel, meals, lodging) for the punch list walkthroughs will be covered by concurrent Task 3 or Task 5 site trips. Each walkthrough and report are estimated to take four hours to complete. In addition, Merrick will provide closeout manual and warranty reviews, as well as 'As -Constructed' Plan Sets for both projects. As -constructed survey data is not included in this proposal for Post Constructed Phase Services. Task 5 — General Construction Support Services This work will be the continuation of as -needed, on -call general construction management and inspection services as described in the 2022 agreement or requested by the Town of Fraser, including Lions Pond work and desktop engineering support services such as RFI's, Staff assistance requests, development completion punch list inspections, and construction documentation review and response. Travel, lodging, meals, and rates under this task will be invoiced per the 2023 Merrick Rate Schedule. Site inspection services under this task will, to the extent possible, be performed in conjunction with the weekly visits included during the 16 weeks of active construction on the aforementioned projects. An additional 10 trips outside of this timeframe has been budgeted to cover other stand-alone site inspections. To date and assumed continuing moving forward, Lyons Pond bathroom work under this Task includes, but is ❑❑0) ❑ fir❑ 000 Greg Steed, P.E. Sr. Project Engineer not limited to, utilities constructability analysis, site grading design, utilities redesign, bid administration, contracting, project management, coordination with Winter Park Ranch, and inspections. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding these proposed services. Sincerely, MERRICK & COMPANY Jody Allen Assistant Project Manager Attachments: 1) Table A-1: Town of Fraser, 2023 Construction Administration Fee Estimate (1 page) 2) 2023 Schedule of Hourly Rates (1 page) CC: Julie Koehler, PE The above proposal is accepted by the Town of Fraser, and the Construction Manager is authorized to proceed with the work. By: Date: Town of Fraser By: Date: Merrick ❑❑03 ❑ fir❑ ❑❑❑ T able A-1 Town of Fraser 2023 Construction Admini stration Fe e Estimat e 1- MERRICK® Pr oject No.: 0492-06-2 Sheet: 1 of 1 Sheet: By: JA Checked: JK/GS Date: 03/16/23 Date: 03/20/23 •❑❑ Task Descripti onsft®- Direct C osts ( - � Task 1 - Pro ject Mana gemen t (April 15 - Dec 31) 1. 1 Pro je ct Administratio n - Mo nthy Invo ices & Reports(0 .5 hr/ wk) 18 .5 18 .5 37 $5,735 $5,735 1.2 Project Administration - QA/QC (0. 5 hr/ wk) 18 .5 18.5 $4,625 $4,625 SUBTOTAL TASK 1 $10,360 Tas k 2 - Pre -Cons truc tion (April 15 - appx. Ju ne 1) 2.1 Pre -Construction M eeting - Byers Avenue W. L. (onsite meeting) 8 0 .5 8 .5 $1,540 $1,540 2.2 Pre -Construction M eeting - S.S. Main Upgrades (onsite meeting) 8 0 .5 8 .5 $1,540 $1,540 2. 3 Shop Drawings/Submitall Reviews - Byers Avenue W. L. (assume 15 @ 3 hrs ea.) 30 15 45 $7,275 $7,275 2.4 Shop Drawings/Submitall Reviews - S.S. Main Upgrades (assume 15 @ 3 hrs ea .) 30 15 45 $7,275 $7,275 2.5 RFI Responses - Byers A venue W. L. (assume10 @ 2hrs ea. ) 20 20 $3,600 $3,600 2. 6 RFI Responses - S. S. Main Upgrades (assume10 @ 2hrs ea.) 20 20 $3,600 $3,600 SUBTOTAL TASK 2 $24,830 Task 3 - Pro ject Specific Co nstru ctio n Administratio n (16 wee ks du rin g Const. Seas on) 3. 1 2023 Co nstruction Administration Travel (240 mi. - 5 hr per Rd. Trip x 16 weeks) 80 80 $14,400 $2,515 $16,915 3. 2 2023 Co nstruction Administration Lodging Per Diem ($164/night + 13% tax/fees x 16 nights) $0 $2,965 $2,965 3.3 2023 Co nstruction Administration Meals Per Diem ($59.25/day x 32 days) $0 $1,896 $1,896 3.4 Weekly Inspections, Construction Meeting & Report - Byers Avenue W. L. (6 hr/wk, 12 wks) 72 72 $12,960 $12,960 3.5 Pay Application Review- Byers Avenue W.L. (.5 hr/wk) 6 6 $1,080 $1,080 3.6 Work Change Directives & Change O rders - Byers Avenue W.L. (1 hr/wk) 12 12 $2,160 $2,160 3.7 Weekly Inspections, Construction Meeting & Report - S.S. Main Upgrades (6 hr/wk, 16 wks) 96 96 $17,280 $17,280 3.8 Pay Application Review- S.S. Main Upgrades (.5 hr/wk) 8 8 $1,440 $1,440 3. 9 Work Change Directives & Change O rders - S. S. Main Upgrades (1 hr/wk) 16 16 $2,880 $2,880 SUBTOTAL TASK 3 $59,576 Task 4 - Po st Co nstru ctio n 4.1 Punch List Walkthro ugh & Report - Byers Avenue W.L. (4 hrs ea x 2, assuming no direct costs) 8 8 $1,440 $1,440 4. 2 Punch List Walkthro ugh & Report - S. S. Main Upgrades (4 hrs ea x 2, assuming no direct costs) 8 8 $1,440 $1,440 4. 3 Clo seo ut Manuals & As -Constructed Documents - Byers Avenue W. L. 8 16 24 $3,440 $3,440 4. 4 Clo seo ut Manuals & As -Constructed Documents - S.S. Main Upgrades 8 24 32 $4,440 $4,440 SUBTOTAL TAS K 4 $10,760 Tas k 5 - G en eral lnspectio n/Tec hnical Suppo rt Allo wan ce (April 15 - De c 31) 5. 1 G eneral Inspection/Technical Suppo rt A llowance (8 hr/week x 26 weeks + 4 hr/week x 11) 252 252 $45,360 $2,270 $47,630 5. 2 Travel / Lodging / Mea ls (10 trips, 5 o vernights) 50 50 $9,000 $1,519 $10,519 5.3 Lions Pond Contracting, Design, Co nstruction Support 60 24 84 $13,800 $690 $14,490 SUBTOTAL TASK 5 $72,639 To tal Hou rs = 19 800 20 94 19 951 To tal = $4,625 $144,000 $3,900 $11,750 $2,035 $166,310 $11,855 $178,165 Assu mptions /No tes: 1. Primary Co nstruction Inspection Period is 26 weeks long - from April 15th to O ctober 15th 2. Merrick to staff 2 days per week o ver a 16 week perio d in Fraser with Travel Expenses, Lodging and Meals (Items 3.1, 3. 2, and 3.3) 3. Byers Avenue Waterline and Sanitary Sewer Main Upgrade construction project durations will be 16 weeks total, approximately running concurrently: A. Byers Avenue Waterline Inspectio n (3 hours) per week, Constructio n meeting with meeting agenda/minutes (1.5 hours) and Daily Inspectio n Repo rt (1.5 hours) (Item 3 .4) B. Sanitary Sewer Main Upgrade Inspection (3 hours) per week, Co nstruction meeting with meeting agenda/minutes (1. 5 ho urs) and Daily Inspection Report (1.5 hours) (Item 3 .7) 4. Punch List Walk Through for Byers Avenue Waterline and Sanitary Sewer Main Upgrade to occur when Inspector is in Fraser fo r typical weekly inspection (Travel Expenses, Lodging and Meals in Item 3 .1, 3 .2, 3 .3) 5. Refer to GSA 2023 rates sheets for Travel Expenses, Lodging and M eals. Mileage rate per GSA is $0. 655/mile. Filename: Fraser 2023 CA Fee 20230320_FINA L Page 1 of 1 Date Printed: 3/20/2023 o o000 MERRI K® SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES EFFECTIVEJanuary 1, 2023 ADMINISTRATION: Clerical $110.00 DRAFTING: Senior Technician Technician FIELD ENGINEERING: Senior Construction Manager Construction Manager/Construction Administrator Senior Field Engineer Field Engineer/Senior Field Technician Field Engineering Technician $155.00 $125.00 $200.00 $180.00 $155.00 $140.00 $125.00 PROJECT ENGINEERING: Senior Project Engineer/Assistant Project Manager $200.00 Project Engineer $175.00 Senior Design Engineer $155.00 Design Engineer $140.00 Senior Designer $140.00 Designer $125.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT: Senior Project Manager/Sr. Technical Manager Project/Technical Manager OTHER: $250.00 $225.00 Subconsultant Cost + 10% Courier Cost + 10% Expert Witness Court Appearance $3,000.00/day G.P.S. System $125/unit/day Workstations/Specialized Equipment (Minimum Charge $25.00) $60.00/day Minimum Charge $25.00 Personal Vehicle Mileage Current Allowable IRS Rate Special Software Cost + 10% Other Materials or Equipment Other Materials or Equipment Cost+ 10% Above standard rates will be held firm through December31, 2023. Standard rates will be subjectto review in the fourth quarter in 2023. Client will be notified in writing of any requested changes. a�iaaaaa��ia�ia�aa Employee Owned hello@merrick.com' www.merrick.com MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: u11'1 I 111Idiuffi,,,,,,immIui mm: 4iiiiakhommat" 4126, Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees Paul Johnson, Public Works Director May 3, 2023 Chapter 13 Code Change Regarding Water Meters MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Consideration of a code change to Chapter 13 of the Town code referencing maintenance and repair of water meters. BACKGROUND: Town code currently restricts the maintenance and repair of water meters to being performed by the Town. Code change will strike the language stating that the Town is to perform the maintenance or repair allowing for these services to be provided by a licensed contractor hired by the property owner while on site for other services. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve of Ordinance 498, the striking of language requiring maintenance or repair of water meters to be performed by the Town to allow for work by licensed contractors. TOWN OF FRASER ORDINANCE NO. 498 Series 2023 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 ARTICLE 2 OF THE FRASER MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING WATER METERS WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has determined that it is in the public' s interest to establish rules and regulations relating to Municipal Utilities NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, THAT: PART 1: AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 13, of the Fraser Municipal Code (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") are hereby amended as follows [Note: additions are shown in bold underlined print; deletions are shown as strikcthrough print]: Chapter 13 Sec 13-2-310 — Water Meters. (b) All water meter assemblies shall be of a type, size and design as set forth in Chapter 14, Design Criteria and Construction Standards, as adopted by the Board of Trustees. Maintcnancc and rcpair of watcr mctcrs shall be performcd by the Town." Any costs associated with neglect, abuse or tampering of the water meter assembly shall be the responsibility of the property owner and shall be added to other water service fees. PART 2: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance. PART 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PART 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. PART 5: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published by title only. READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS 3rd DAY OF MAY, 2023. Votes in favor: Votes opposed: Votes abstained: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO BY: Mayor (SEAL) ATTEST: Published in the Middle Park Times on Town Clerk 2 TOWN OF FRASER - JFF P.O. BOX 89 1 FRASER, CO 80442 970-726-5491 UPPER FRASER VALLEY WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Joint Facilities Oversight Committee Meeting Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:00 p.m. Zoom Meeting Information https://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting ID: 259 040 8013 Phone 1-253-215-8782 AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Consent Agenda a. Minutes March 16, 2023 4. FOG Update and Resolution: Paul a. (Anticipated) Approved Ordinance and Resolution 5. Tetra Tech Engineer Proposal: Joe a. (Anticipated) Providing Contract for Approval 6. IPP Option 1 (Town Guidance) and Resolution for Approval: Michael and Joe a. Staff Briefing b. Handout for Option 1 and Option 2 c. Approved Resolution 7. Jacobs Engineering Response to Recommendations: Joe a. Response to Recommendations Document 8. Independent Manager Study: Rob and Michael a. Staff Briefing b. JFOC Vote to Approve/Deny Study 9. Adjourn Two or more Elected Officials of the Grand County Water & Sanitation District #1, Town of Fraser and the Winter Park Ranch Water and Sanitation District sit as the Joint Facilities Oversight Committee (JFOC) and may attend this meeting. The JFOC Committee reserves the right to take action on any discussion item presented on the agenda. Posted: MOUNTAIN PARKS ELECTRIC, INC. A Touchstone Energy' Cooperative DISTRICT 1 2023 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CANDIDATE BIOGRAPHIES (EAST SIDE OF US HWY 40, FRASER/WINTER PARK AREA) PHILLIP ARCHER I'm running for MPEI Board of Directors to ensure high reliability and low costs for the members. Electricity is the lifeblood of modern society. Challenges include population growth, switching to renewable power, security requirements and electric vehicle loads. MPEI's recent cancellation notice to Tri-State Generation and Transmission underscores the gravity of the decisions it faces over the next few years. I work as Director of Project Engineering for Crusoe Energy. I'm a registered professional engineer in Colorado. I am adept at mechanical, electrical and process engineering for midstream oil and gas. I've earned an MBA from the University of Utah and a BS Mechanical Engineering from Oklahoma State University. Energy has been a (lifelong focus. For over 30 years, I have negotiated electrical services for new and existing industrial sites totalling over 300,000 KW in Colorado, Utah and West Virginia. I'm an avid skier, mountain biker, motorcycle enthusiast and disc golfer. I'm a member of the Colorado Biathlon Club and have skied the American Birkebeiner seven times. eq,,,.. u „;?' M JOE SMYTH I hope to serve on the Mountain Parks board to continue working for fair rates, dean energy, and programs that support our members. I've worked as a clean energy advocate for 15 years, and I'm excited about new opportunities for non- profit utilities like Mountain Parks. Thanks to technology advances and new policies, we can now reduce costs with renewable energy, while keeping more of our energy dollars invested in our community and less paying for fuel at distant power plants. I also have a proven track record saving our members money: in 2019, I stopped an unnecessary rate increase through a formal challenge and hearing before the Mountain Parks board, That saved our members more than $1.5 million over the last four years. As your representative, l will continue to advocate for fair rates, and expand programs that help our members save money on their energy bills. I've worked with electric cooperatives, clean energy groups, and policymakers to bring more transparency and accountability to the largest power companies in Colorado, and empower community -based utilities like Mountain Parks to focus more on our members' needs. With your vote, I will bring that experience to our co-op. More at VoteJoeSmyth.com CHRISTINE LARKIN am a licensed attorney. I started my legall career in 1994 in Dallas where I served for 10 years as outside corporate counsel to one of the largest electric utility companies in Texas. This was during a period of major utility industry change, including electric utility deregulation and a fundamental change to how consumers purchased electric power. If you are familiar with the changes to come in MPE's power supply agreement, you will appreciate that my broad business and legal experience will be beneficial to the MPE board and management at this critical time. While I left private practice to serve as in-house counsel for a publicly traded media company in 2004, my interest in the electric utility industry has remained strong. As General Counsel, I was responsible for the company's legal affairs, including the negotiation of major transactions, and, as corporate secretary, acted as liaison to the board of directors. I am now a full-time resident of Fraser. My background in the electric utillity industry, coupled with almost 30 years of business and legal experience and my deep appreciation of our mountain community, makes me uniquely qualified and desiring to serve on the MPE Board. Learn more: www.larkinformpe.com. RYAN ZORN Born and raised in a Colorado area served by a rural electric cooperative, I have a special appreciation for MPEI's essential service and community impact. I graduated from Colorado School of Mines, and my career has been dedicated to analyzing the energy sector, weighing the costs and benefits of all energy sources, and allocating capital towards the most deserving participants and projects. These experiences are particularly relevant to the work of the MPEI board. For decades, most have not been confronted with budget -breaking costs, disrupted supply, or limitations on the energy choices that best serve our households and businesses. That is changing. MPEI recently voted to break its contract with the current supplier of our electricity and now faces critical decisions regarding the future supplier of our power. As your representative, I will prioritize future supply sources that offer reliable, scalable, low-cost energy that can be delivered to MPEI with the lowest impact to the communities and environments that enable the production and transmission of our power. Small communities offer unique opportunities to pitch in and create a positive impact for all. From coaching kids, to chaperoning eighth graders in D.C., or offering professional perspective at MPEI—I'm all in! DirectVote- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES DATE: Tuesday, April 25th, 2023 MEETING: Economic Development Committee Special Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT Board: Nicole Spiteri, Paula Stuart, Kelsey Young, Autumn Bishop, Barry Young Staff: Marketing and Communications Manager, Sarah Wieck; Town Manager, Michael Brack, Sara Assistant Town Manager 1. Regular Meeting: Roll Call 9:02 am 2. Approval of Agenda: Barry moved, Kelsey seconded. Motion carried 5-0 3. Consent Agenda: Barry moved, Kelsey seconded. Motion carried 5-0 4. Discussion a. Clayton Court rezoning — Michael Brack a. Ordinance will be drafted for the board to approve Clayton court to be rezone for mixed use high density b. Discussing on parking c. Discussion on TIFF districts and DDAs d. Temporary parking e. Parking workshop for the board f. EDAC workshop for parking before board meeting g. June 7th EDAC parking presentation for town board i. Why ii. Code requirement updates iii. What we current needs for current and new businesses iv. Future v. Recommendations 5. Open Forum: 6. Other Business: Page 2 of 2 a. Economic incentive packages — Rob Clemens a. Deferred tap fees b. Sales tax and use tax c. Property tax rebate d. Marketing e. Building permit and review fees f. Utility service fee g. Zoning overlays h. Conditional claw back rebates i. Land donations for affordable housing j. NGO grant partnerships b. Driving commercial development- Michael Brack a. Parking/infrastructure b. Economic and development incentives c. TIFF/DDA 7. Future Agenda Items a. FAB b. Parking workshop 8. Adjourn 10:35 am autumn moved to adjourn, Autumn seconded. Motion carried 5-0 PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE MINUTES DATE: Friday, March 17th, 2023 MEETING: Public Arts Committee Special Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT Board: Steve Fitzgerald, Lisa Baird, Kerry Crandell, Cyndi McCoy, Jerilyn Suster, Callie McDermot Staff: Marketing and Communications Manager, Sarah Wieck 1. Regular Meeting: Roll Call Steve called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. 2. Approval of Agenda: Jerilyn moved, and Cyndi seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 6-0. 3. Consent Agenda: Calie moved, and Cyndi seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 6-0. 4. Discussion a. Sculptures (Billy Jo and Payments) i. Lions ponds, fraser river trail, ace hardware, post office, b. Mural Fest 2023 i. Aug 4-6 ii. 30-35 artists iii. Awards: Local people's choice, everyone else, artist choice, PAC choice, commission award iv. Commission award; inside post office, outside post office, inside rec center, winery, school, Koslig on main development. v. Theme: "we come in peace" Page 2 of 2 5. Open Forum: 6. Other Business: 7. Future Agenda Item: 8. Meeting Adjourned: Callie moved, and Lisa seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m. PUBLIC ARTS COMMITTEE MINUTES DATE: Friday, April 14th, 2023 MEETING: Public Arts Committee Special Meeting PLACE: Fraser Town Hall Board Room PRESENT Board: Steve Fitzgerald, Lisa Baird, Kerry Crandell, Callie McDermot, Eric Vandernail Staff: Marketing and Communications Manager, Sarah Wieck 1. Regular Meeting: Roll Call Steve called the meeting to order at 9:04 a.m. 2. Approval of Agenda: Callie moved, and Eric seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 5- 0. 3. Consent Agenda: Callie moved, and Eric seconded the motion to approve the Agenda. Motion carried: 5- 0. 4. Discussion a. Billy Jo Sculpture placement i. Sculpture will be placed in between the Lions ponds b. Mural Fest 2023 i. Housing for artist — Eric will reserve campsite and Kerry will check with SMR ii. Callie will take on the duties of artist correspondence. iii. More signage and FMMF flags for throughout town iv. New tents and signage v. Sarah contact post office and rec center about murals. vi. PAC members will take on similar duties as last year Page 2 of 2 5. Open Forum: 6. Other Business: 7. Future Agenda Item: 8. Meeting Adjourned: Callie moved, and Lisa seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 6-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:45 a.m.