Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutEureka Federal Savings Improvements - 2600 South El Camino RealFinal Traffic Study EUREKA FEDERAL SAVINGS PROJECT El Camino Real Near 25th Avenue City of San Mateo, California Prepared for CITY OF SAN MATEO Department of Community Development Planning` Division By BARNARD C. JOHNSON, P.E. Traffic Engineering Consultant January 25, 1979 Final Traffic Study EUREKA FEDERAL SAVINGS PROJECT • El Camino Real Near 25th Avenue City of San Mateo, California • Prepared for • CITY OF SAN.MATEO Department of Community Development Planning Division • • • • By BARNARD C. JOHNSON, P.E. Traffic Engineering Consultant January 25, 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNICAL EVALUATION Existing Conditions Vehicle Trip Generation Trip Distribution and Assignment Traffic Impact Evaluation CONCLUSION APPENDICES: Appendix A. Appendix B. Appendix C. Appendix D. Page 1 2 7 3 9 9 Level of Service Guidelines Existing Level of Service Weekday Hourly Volume Variation and Vehicle Access Assignments Report Author. BCJ PE • • Final Traffic Study EUREKA FEDERAL SAVINGS PROJECT El Camino Real Near 25th Avenue City of San Mateo, California This traffic study has focused on the proposed Planned Development project by Eureka Federal Savings & Loan at the subject • location. Residential, commercialand office uses are proposed for the 46,544 square foot "L" -shaped lot fronting on El Camino Real and on 26th Place. This report includes tabulations to facilitate comparisons • of the numerical values for existing and future land use and traffic conditions. Definitions of traffic flow quality are discussed in terms of level of service with existing conditions as a base. The land use assumptions are essentially those exist- ing today plus the proposed development. • • TECHNICAL EVALUATION The study has been at a general level of detail and was intended to provide an overview assessment of traffic impact of the proposed development. The basic intent was to consider the proposed development as a whole and evaluate the traffic conditions for any possible adverse impacts. If so, it would be known early in the City's project review process whether adverse elements could be avoided and, the street system could operate in a safe and efficient manner. • Standard technical methodology has been used incorporating the following elements: • Description of existing condition • Vehicle trip generation • • Trip distribution and assignment • Traffic impact evaluation BCJ PE The conclusions reached are based on an independent assessment of • the study findings using conservative assumptions. • • • • • Existing Conditions Understanding the current operation of adjacent intersections is necessary to evaluate the impact of new traffic on that inter- section. This includes an awareness of the conditions experienced by the general public while driving, walking, or observing the intersection. A further point of awareness in the evaluation is the rela- tive degree of concern by the public. Tolerance levels are different in the central business districts of urban street systems (the El Camino Real Corridor in San Mateo,for example) than they are for an outlying arterial, or for a local neighborhood street. In very subjective terms, traffic volume impact might be equivalent as viewed by abutting land owners (tenants). and by motorists for the various classes of streets shown in Table 1. TABLE 1. RELATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUME IMPACTS Equivalent Levels of Concern (Generalized) VOLUME LEVEL OF CLASSIFICATION (Vehicles Per Day) CONCERN Local Street (2 Lanes) 500 Acceptable • Collector Street (2-4 Lanes) 5,000 Acceptable Arterial (4-6 Lanes) 20,000 Acceptable In the Eureka Federal Savings (EFS) study area, there are •' fluctuating volumes associated with residential and commerical land uses. The project area is in a particularly sensitive location. Commercial development depends upon easy vehicular access and high volume levels. The local residential areas (on Edison Street and • on 26th Place) are in the opposite category - the lower the traffic volume in front of residences, the better. " BCJ PE 3 " Commuting and general circulation throughout the day produce varying daily and peak -hour volumes. For example, Table 2 shows the relative traffic volume counts in the study area. TABLE 2. DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES " Estimated and Counted " " DAILY VOLUME STREET Vehicles Per Day Edison Street 28th Avenue 27th Avenue 25th Avenue El Camino Real 800 2,600 4,200 8,300 43,000 " El Camino Real is a major arterial that operates at critical levels in peak periods. The street is very sensitive to traffic flow irregularities. Tables 3 and 4 show that volumes are at high levels and fairly uniform throughout the late afternoon peak period. Also, the volumes are spread out much more throughout the day (7 AM - 7 PM at 72 percent) as compared with a local street like Edison which probably has 85-90 percent of its traffic between 7 AM and 7 PM. " " " TABLE 3. MACHINE TRAFFIC COUNTS El Camino Real 1977 State Traffic Census LOCATION * PEAK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC HOUR Peak Month Annual North of Hillsdale Blvd 3,600 South of Route 92 4,100 43,000 49,500 40,000 45,500 * Cross street reference BCJ PE 4 • TABLE 4. MACHINE TRAFFIC COUNTS City of San Mateo, January 20, 1978, Friday El Camino Real - South of 27th Avenue • DIRECTION TIME Southbound Northbound TOTAL 2 - 3 PM 1,379 1,532 2,911 3 - 4 1,461 1,471 2,932 • 4 - 5 1,629 1,457 3,086 5 - 6 1,720 1,340 3,060 6 - 7 1,195 1,152 2,347 • 24 -Hour 20,001 22,654 42,655 12 -Hour (% of 24 -Hour) 14,583 (73%) 16,029 (71%) 30,612 (72%) Peak hour flows have been studied in detail at El Camino Real • and 25th Avenue. An earlier traffic count by Caltrans has supplemented the recent counts made for this study. Figure 1 shows the Friday evening peak hour turning movements for the intersection. • • • The intersection is relatively congested and was observed operating at Level -of -Service "D" as shown in Table 5. Pedestrian volumes were very light and did not adversely affect traffic flow. Violations of the red signal display were observed regularly indicating the amount of traffic "pressure" exerted at the intersection. Traffic volumes were sampled at 27th Avenue and El Camino Real and observed for the other streets in the area. The critical lane volume analysis for 25th Avenue and El Camino Real is shown in Appendix B. The resulting critical lane volume of 1,410 vehicles per hour can be compared with the guide- • lines in Appendix A and shows the intersection to be operating at Level -of -Service "D". This tolerable operating level has developed over the last three years since 1975 with Level -of - Service "C". " 2,00.3 /,702 /42 " i 2,105 Midday ` D a'mIir I /.976 4,30--.. OPM /62 41308 5 367 Figure / PE'Aii HOUR 1/041 UME " 2577/ 411- EL CAM/NO REAL BCJ • PE TABLE 5. INTERSECTION VOLUMES Turning Movement Summary 25th Avenue & El Camino Real CRITICAL LEVEL DAY/DATE TOTAL PEDESTRIANS LANE OF • Time VEHICLES West North East VOLUME SERVICE* Friday, 1 Dec. 78 4:30-5:30 PM Wednesday, 12 Mar. 75 • 4:30-5:30 PM Saturday, 2 Dec. 78 11:15 AM - 12:15 PM • 4,859 3,708** 4,306 42 64 11 1,410 44 47 23 1,130 31 83 26 1,160 IfDn tic 11 **Machine counts show the Friday peak hour at 11% higher than for Wednesday. With this adjustment, there has been an increase of about 6 percent per year in intersection volume. *The level -of -service guidelines and discussion are presented in • Appendix A. Traffic conditions on El Camino Real are further described by samples of vehicle travel speeds. As shown in Table 6, the • evening peak hour speeds are at, or below the guideline for Level "D" of about 15 MPH. • TABLE 6. VEHICLE TRAVEL SPEEDS El Camino Real - 20th to 28th Avenues DAY/DATE/TIME TRAVEL SPEEDS, MPH Southbound Northbound • Friday, December 8, 1978 11-11:20 AM 19.9 19.9 4:34-5:12 PM 11.4 15.4 Saturday, December 9, 1978 • 12:05-12:24 PM, and 12:42-12:55 PM 18.0 20.8 6 " BCJ PE 7 Both Edison Street and 26th Place are narrow with parking " at the curb. Although parking spaces are available during the day, these streets cannot be counted on as part of the parking supply for the EFS project. Two-way traffic flow is particularly tight through the corner turn at Edison and 26th Place. " vehicle Trip Generation The residential, commercial and office uses generate traffic at different rates and with different peak -hour characteristics. " In tabular form, the.. differences can be easily seen. Table 7 shows the estimated generation based on standard data (Caltrans and the Institute of Transportation Engineers). Appendix Figure C-1 shows the weekday hourly variation for each use. " " " " TABLE 7. TRIP GENERATION With Mode -Split Estimates LAND USE GENERATION RATE Trips/Unit TRIP GENERATION* Daily Peak Hour Residential 22 Dwelling Units 6/DU 130 14 Commercial-(EFS) 5,058 Sq. Ft. 70/1,000 Sq. Ft. 350 56 Drive -Up Window - 100 40 Office 21,000 Sq. Ft. 15/1,000 Sq. Ft. 315 47 " Sub -Total 895 157 Less Walk -Ins 48 7 " TOTAL 847 150 * The number of actual vehicles involved is half the number of trip - ends generated at thesite (i.e., one car arriving, parking, and leaving constitutes two trip ends). Thus, the total traffic gen- " erated an a daily basis of 850 trips actually constitutes 425 vehicles making a one-way trip to the site and a one-way trip from the site. BCJ PE 8 • • Trip Distribution and Assignment Travel to and from the EFS project has been assumed approximately as follows: • North: 50% ▪ South: 30% • East: 10% • West: 10% For peak period analysis the travel characteristics are distinctly • different. Table 8 shows the net result. • TABLE 8. PEAK HOUR TRAVEL By Land -Use Type, Less Pedestrians LAND USE PEAK HOUR TRAVEL In Out Percent Vehicles Percent Vehicles • Residential 70 9 30 3 EFS Office 50 25 50 25 EFS Drive -Up 50 20 50 20 Office 15 7 85 41 • • • TOTAL 61 89 ESTIMATED PEAK 15 MINUTE FLOW 25 - 40 Detailed assignments are shown in Appendix Figure C-2. Primary access is via El Camino Real with right turns in and out of EFS. No left turns have been assumed to or from El Camino Real for peak hour analysis. Traffic Imzact Evaluation It is clear that the estimated peak -hour traffic impact is • relatively small. Less than 100 vehicles per hour are added to the El Camino Real and 25th Avenue intersection (presently carrying 4,860 vehicles per hour). There is an insignificant adverse impact on the critical lane volumes for the intersection. " BCJ PE " " 9 Of more relevant concern is the impact on 26th Place. The pro- " portional effect is higher; however, the absolute magnitude is small at an estimated increase of 60 vehicles per hour between EFS and Flores Street. An estimated 34 vehicles per hour could use Edison Street. With the increased turning movements, adequate sight distances " and safe turning paths would be important. The interior circulation for the EFS project is workable. How- ever, there are restrictions imposed by the parking aisle pattern. Turning paths for right -turning vehicles cross over into on -coming " lanes. With the low volumes estimated, there should be no safety problem. Interrupted flow, inconvenience and some delay can be expected since the main access aisles also serve as parking stalls. " " " CONCLUSION The estimated future traffic increases in the study area would appear to be possible while maintaining a tolerable level of service (Level -of -Service "D") and relative safety at El Camino Real and 25th Avenue. Many cities would like to plan for a Level -of -Service "C" throughout their arterial street system. They also recognize that increased congestion (Level "D") can be tolerated during the peak hours. " A RIGHT TURN ONLY sign (R41) should be installed for EFS traffic entering El Camino Real. The northbound left turn from El Camino Real to EFS is already illegal. The imposition of these turn " restrictions diverts traffic to 26th Place and Edison Street. The EFS project frontage on 26th Place should be set back about 8 feet if possible to facilitate vehicular flow through the turn (at 26th & Edison) and to provide for loading and passenger pick-up activity. The RIGHT TURN ONLY regulation for traffic exiting EFS onto 26th Place would only reduce traffic on Edison Street by 15 vehicles per hour. The resulting right turn (which will occur anyway) needs on -street design treatment to avoid the head-on accident potention. Lengthening the driveway about 10 feet would help. APPENDICES Appendix A. Level of Service Guidelines Appendix B. Existing Level of Service Appendix C. Weekday Hourly Volume Variation and Vehicle Access Assignments Appendix D. Report Author " " " 1 " " " " " " ** TABLE 1. QUALITY OF TRAFFIC FLOW OVERALL INTERSECTION AVERAGE LEVEL OF OBSERVED FLOW CONDITION AVERAGE VOLUME/ LANE -VOLUME VEHICLE CAPACITY SERVICE* ON STREET SPEED CAPACITY SUf'MATION** SPACING INDEX (mph) RATIO (vnh) (sec) A Free Flow (relatively) 30 0.70 B Stable Flow (slight delay) 25 0.70-0.79 950 3.4 0.65 C Stable Flow (acceptable delay) 20 0.80-0.89 1,200 2.7 0.85 D Approaching unstable (tolerable delay) 15 0.90-0.99 1,400 2.3 1.00 E Unstable (intolerable approx (Capacity) delay) 15 1.00 1,550 2.1 1.10 F Forced Flow (jammed) 15 Not Meaningful SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual (Page 323) and general professional practice. * Continued research by the Federal Highway Administration and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (National Academy of Sciences) is refining the concept. At intersections, there is an approximate total number of vehicles per lane for each Level of Service. This number is the total of the highest conflicting traffic volumes per lane and is also referred to as the critical volume. APPENDIX B EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 25th Avenue and El Camino Real i 3.2 8-1 25r// ,'11.4. Ex/sizing Cctt dr= Friday, PFDcaher ,. "976 4;30 -530P41 fn/ !/eh%C/ .485:9 'Ala/4e: Lal_Je Yc7%C'/// `. 63 1.1175 230 • 6F-414 1.14 4 3T5 APPENDIX C WEEKDAY HOURLY VOLUME VARIATION AND VEHICLE ACCESS ASSIPTIENTS " " " " " " " " Z Oflice $ 0 c Cotoineeelei(EF".5) -r- 1 -t t  1---+ +-- --+--1 1 P% 1 s't 1 I fz 6 12 m rIA./��.�� E AT ,IFS Pirewer pvedie.ry Amifiry Mk,/ 5er % ate on. ,%ge C- 2 /iv- pea /cur 41,;s71/oval , " " " " " " " 25TH Ave" I ��iav�� ui241 6/ " 0^--- NU/a" c99 / /G " i4L /50 rrifr " safe .,1 /el./ `.: 417 hri ./r fret 'V FFP 41\ /9 EA L f'eeirdvy YeQA /r'ur 1//4-/-ila ACCE3 A66 /6/1/M 11'75 APPENDIX D REPORT AUTHOR Barnard C. Johnson; P.P. P7R1ARD C. 3()IINSON, P.E. • Mr. Johnson is a consulting traffic and transportation engineer specializing in traffic operations and safety. Most of his experience has emphasized increasing operational effi- ciency through traffic regulations and control. His prior experience covers over twenty-one years of • traffic engineering, nine years with the City of. San Francisco, eleven years as a Vice President and Project Director with JIIK and Associates, and almost two years self-employed. Mr. Johnson has directed or participated in many studies of the impacts of traffic generated bya wide variety of pro- • posed land use developments. Specific responsibilities also have included a large number of projects in California and other states involving traffic signal and control systems, general traffic operations, design of ,signing, marking, and channelization systems. T1r. Johnson has had extensive experience on major traffic research projects. He was Co -Principal Investigator on NCHRP Project 3-11, a tiro -year project including area;bride evaluation of operational improvements. Mr. Johnson worked extensively on a research project for the Bureau of Public Roads, Intersection Simulation Model Validation, Contract No. CPR -.11-2863. That project involved component validation for four major intersec- tion.signalization models. Mr. Johnson directed a major project in Israel which defined a comprehensive urban traffic control system for the Tel -Aviv metropolitan area. The system included both the sur- face street network and the Ayalon Freeway. After receiving his Bachelor_ of Science degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley, Mr. Johnson obtained the Master of Engineering degree from the Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering (now ITS) at the University of California. He is a Registered Professional Engineer (Civil 13,322 and Traffic 7"S) in California. Other. P.7. .registr..ations include the States of Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and lashington. IIe is also a "o_l.lo<<r .in the Institute of '''.r. ansportation Engineers, and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers, and the A-: erican Public Works Association. IIe has served as the Chairman of the San Francisco I3ay Area in the Western Section of the Institute -of Transportation Engineers. ?Ie is serving on the Pedestrian Characteristics Committee (_A313O4) of the Trans- portation Research Board. • • • • March 25, 1°83 John Sutti and _ Associates, Inc. 1327 North Carolan Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 Re:.' 2600 F1 Camino Real, San -'Mateo Gentlemen: The eighteen -month landscape maintenance period is completed on above named project which bears San Mateo No. PA81-50, and of San Mateo releases its interest in the project. the the City The Landscape .Maintenance Bond No. 73-0120-7470-79 in the amount of $9,160 may now. he released. Very truly yours, ROBERT C.. BEZZANT OIPECTCR OF PUBLIC WORKS, GREGORY S. LITCHFR ENGINEERING TRCPNICIAPT RCB : CS1, : vm-4 7 " r-" !V D DAO/loyee6/4.20/f,.V--'-----;"uz'e. MAR 241883 TO: Landscape Inspector SAN MATEO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. FROM: Administrative Assistant/Public Works RE: Project location ,06 6? PA# The above named project is scheduled to have its 18 -month landscape maintenance bond released in two weeks . Please inspect this project and return this slip to the Administrative Assistant in Public Works. J'' Landscape Maintenance Conditions Satisfied Landscape Maintenance Conditions Not Satifsfie g ned 3 D " " L..A1\iD ���� �� _l s%�� C. 1 - -- sh�%E __ Mi&r Loc VON �% ����- c�� ;��,��(d_we " P4? A e.A _ ..) c_ 5A-V//v3) �� /y 7 A uLING AADR 35 t N SOTT- l , SSc)C, I -3A7 do. Ce1f20CAlQ h`l/E 60/24-/A-kv- >IF A y'1*'/c /NSPOCr/Qom.: 0 LAt`1Dsc,tisPe IN6Tfa t..prrloN# .. -5o Q 18 nrkt LAND5eAP6 mistirsITENANCE 4*' RVQ AN cz GuAtuk ee : 0 DONfl .oTtle #; 73 -o 1. ,c, .-7y- 7G. 79 16 FA .,r., 0 N . EXPIIkR7"loN DR7E 1..97 PftESENny oc.c-t,cpi eD PFo AppRoveo D Nor APPR.oVED 1N6P��-rioN PATe PATE le MoNTFts Wi 'te 444 .E 1$ BE Co,M Te Cogitecnye AprioN t oNDrn o P5 Kin 50irzFMP c RECEIVED • • UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY tV i\-(EU PUBLIC WORKS DEP i. L OWNER, OBLIGEE OR ORIGINATING CO. & ADDRESS STATUS INQUIRY A•', City of San Mateo r �� 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, -Ca. -- CONTRACTOR ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT * John Sutti & Associates, Inc. DATE 3/1/82 OUR BOND No. 74-0120-07469--79 REINSURER"5 ND. 1327 N. Carolan Ave., Burlingame, Ca. 94010 Landscape Installation, City of San Mateo, Ca. OWNER CONTRACT PRICE City of San Mateo, Ca. 5 46,687.00 BONDS IS7 23,343.50 & 46,687.00 EFFECTIVE DATE 9/25/79 WITHOUT PREJUDICING YOUR RIGHT OR AFFECTING OUR LIABILITY UNDER OUR BOND(S) DESCRIBED ABOVE, WE WOULD APPRECIATE SUCH OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS IS NOW AVAILABLE. *INCLUDE LOCATION AND OWNER'S CONTRACT NUMBER. VERY TRULY YOURS, J delity & Sur e,L`y Dept. M. BruinemanT- - 1 . IF CONTRA CO PLETED, PLEASE STATE: 2. IF CONTRACT UNCOMPLETED, PLEASE STATE: APPROXIMATE DATE OF"EXIMPLETION•--- APPROXIMATE ACCEPTANCE FINAL CONTRACT PRICE OF WORK (OR FINAL DELIVERY). DATE el -2E3 -gi APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OR DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CONTRACT COMPLETED OR DELIVERED 3. DO YOU KNOW OF ANY UNPAID BILLS FOR LABOR OR MATERIALS: 4. REMARKS: `7G'S AM,5 1 e z L2 /4) Sj NAME: ADDRESS: PLEASE RETURN ORIGINAL OF THIS INQUIRY IN ENCLOSED ENVELOPE TO: I United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. P.O. Box 672.0 San Jose, Ca. 95150 YES N1:10 It is understood that the information contained herein is furnished as a matter of courtesy for the confidential use of the surety and is merely an expression of opinion. It is also agreed that in furnishing this information, no guaranty or warranty of accuracy or correctness is made and no responsibility is assumed as a result of reliance by the surety, whether such information is furnished by the owner or by an architect or engineer as the agent of the owner. OWNER- C/i3%4Ll/4Yt,I /0.40.4-' BY. SIG ATURE TITLE: VCr-/ G" cue Q P2? , CONTRACT Z6A ..-i(i l GENERAL FORM STATUS INQUIRY FEDERAL CASES TO BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. STAMPED. ADDRESSED ENVELOPE TO RE ATTACHED. DATE: � 1'+L- 7 THE LANGUAGE OF THIS FORM I5 ACCEPTABLE TO THE SURETY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA L \LD5 c-AP_S IN5, EG 1 ! - SHEET OJ CT LUC 770N AOF___lia.72,.‘2_°`!cAtc_ _ 4 ,Q/750 A . ,r n1 -T. £U - ? ,..vim �.�' , Fi . •v r. r'a /c Aix /N& AIVAESS /NS/EJECT/0N: LAND3cA.p 114.5-r"u vot%1# ._- 0 1$ Mt‘ LAND.5cAPe MAINTENANCE RForzisaNANCee G A ttree : SISOND ACve ADD Re : , 720 A5/20 EXPJM7ioN Atre Ib FAC4LT-Tz3 mESEN'fl.4 OeC,t,cpED ❑DES 0 No RCTI cN : 13' AfitoVEz, NDT PPKoVrsD IN6Pee-TroN 15b:AA1' lsMoM'4is MAfN'iEN Nr-� � _._ p.ATE: i�� 4DTv BE CoMiCETE: &tractive AtTi9N For. LoNnlTipris Nor 3ansFifn c INVOICE G. BORTOLOTA & COMPANY • City of San Mateo 330 W. 20th Ave. San Mateo, CA 94403 Attn: Pete Boyle Job Location Your Number 26th Place, San Mateo Street improvements on 10/21/81 869 LURLINE STREET FOSTER CITY, CA. 94404 4415) 349-8970 Contractors License A323730 %dry d' ' •?Lao - .? G 'e .?C Date October 30, 1981 Invoice No. 1108 Job No Progress Billing No TERMS: Net Cash Place Base Rock 25.76 ton @ $20.00 per ton 3/4" A/C plug 32.96 ton @ 55.00 per ton Overlay with 1" A/C 5,725 sq.ft. @ .84f per sq.ft. Raise 3 manholes @ $180. each $515.20 1,812.80 4,809.50 540.00 TOTAL DUE $7,677.50 TERMS AND CONDITIONS \\A0/6 si\k, 1. No adjustment will be mode on the foregoing invoice unless a written claim is filed within ten days from the date hereof. The customer agrees to pay this invoice in full at the office of G. Bortolotto & Company at 869 Lurline Street, Foster City, California 94404. 2. In the event payment is not so made, this invoice shall hereafter bear interest at the rote of 11/2% per month, and in the event an action be commenced for the collection of this account, the customer agrees to pay a reasonable attorney's fee. 3. Since the contioctor is covered by public liability insurance, the customer shall not be entitled to offset any claim for property damage or personal injuries against any indebtedness due contractor. sea DDLDN / DRULIA•/ASSODS. landscape and site planning jV� san francisco hay area F l tahoe area 93 SO. CENTRAL AVE. SUITE 72, CAMPBELL, CA 95008 P.O. BOX 2834, TRUCKEE. CA 95734 FILE copy (LDt - t- SUBJECT_t_r eta E y IF.011-00.1G 0(e 10 C40441t,k,o prr,44_ a ►3 M (��1 Cam. -1)9-t936,b SaA(-7- '1`f - U4 J c5a -11477 <�l�bJ� t tJ tAot - 21 /U.tc-ttl' .- 13. t_t J L46.43i - C 4 (T1e7r VA- : epter+br r 28, I'9R1 John Sutti and Associates Incorporated 1327 North Carolen Avenue Durlitage e, CA 94[!10 Res: 2600 El Camino Real, San Mateo The work has been completed cm the aat°+nvee-named project which hears flan Mateo No. 1211L-.14.. Tho public improvements art` complete as of Sesptenher 23, 1981, and the City releases its intnrest in the project as of that !ate. The hands puaranteeinp perfornance of work, labor and materials and installation of landscaping may now be released. d. The hone numbers and amounts i+laid; can he released area: Bond 07°1--0120x-74x,9-79 And 'amount 546,687.00 Bona #73-0120-7469-79 and amount $23,343.50 The landscape maintenance bon ! #73-0120-7470-79 in they amount of 39,160.00 is to remain in full force for eighteen months:. Sincerely, ROBERT C. BEZZM T DIRECTOR ()F PUBLIC WORKS G CORY S. LITCHER ENGINEERING T CY 1 RGB zGSL: Za:--4 9 " " John Rt.rli - Re: Sire ZOQO.- So. According to over r-. cords, your Public-1ert::s Lncroachn " No:(724r han.; suited. The f:nrl- for which thr permit wrnu .,J1sued consisted a con t .ori,7 in FA'?1-50. nnci Ilan not ?eon cornleted. T'~errfore, the rrrnit will require an ensi can . Please resch,A t proof of nrorer insurance aN outlined in the enclosed fore to ? r. Gre_>rory 1:itclter, `staff Aide, or 1-fr. r.ruce tiori, Administrative Assistant, so t ilt t,c rerr.i t nay he extended. If you have any questions regarding the wore-. to 1J, cor,Lieted, please feel free to contact tie zt 574-6790. - `fern rrti1 " ? ,'c, trS , ROBl`,tti C. ,'t.e..itl.T DINE4,7TOP OF rt�tLIB ;;TAF . ., f-2 Enclosure .., fD5 c� 1 _ 11 cricfq SHEET 17So/E-C.-r Loc}gDwN : o .fJ-A, ,PLC 87;A/ ckja f n !- A ppot j i ,cUi -'<i I�GsL 7�AL �UiNc c ativ wOwJ2 m- Asoc . A;q/t /11%6 APPREss /rvsPE 7ioN D LAND atekr INtf...Pfli4fl _-- ❑ 18 Alm LAND5C/ UE MAIN r r4ANc RFQRtAAN C.E GLIAlthrtree : 0 DOW) t tEft : A rse -= ADD RE EXP M-noN Pre 16 FA C J way PePfutseNTL4 oc.C, ► eD C1 Es sp a MmoN: l Aprizoveco Cl Nor APPOVeD IN 'ec rI oN Ebb : 3/6/( mAt e4,;416,- _ _ - pfrTe ; 7-/-8/ Pfire 16MoNT% s MAI HTeM 4 OD 1 LE & Ware.: ecfprzerive Ae`io N pzik LotsiorrioNs !gin' 3.x'13 Fib c " JOHN SUTTIkASSOCIATES t PLANNERS " DESIGNERS " BUILDERS April 16, 1981 Mr. Charles E. Carlson, Associate Engineer Department of Public Works City of San Mateo 330 W. 20th Avenue San Mateo, California 94403 Subject: Eureka Federal Savings 2600 South El Camino Real San Mateo, California Dear Mr. Carlson: As per our discussion I am enclosing a check in the amount of $1,800.00 as "in lieu payment" for one street light on El Camino Real in front of the above project. Sincerely, JOHN SUTTI & ASSOCIATES, INC. William Rob -on, AIA WR:b Encl. RECEIVED APR 24 '681 SAN MAT` - O PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. A California Corporation License #338908 1327 NORTH CAROLAN AVENUE " BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 " (415) 347-2115 'RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS INERESION111 1111111111111111111111 000 460 AP R7 1,80011100 FINANCE FORM OM CITY OF SAN MATEO TREASURERS RECEIPT t FOR OFFICE USE ONLY J CONTROL OATS AMOUNT..... N2 24341 C SH/ER/AGENT BRIAN • KANGAS •nULK & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEE PLANNERS • SURVEYORS 595 Price Avenue • Redwood City, CA. 94063 • Te1.(415) 365-0412 June 19, 1980 Job No. 79171 Mr. Elmer Schaal Department of Public Works City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Dear Elmer: 2CGo RCR. Enclosed are two (2) sets of the 26th Place improvement plan revised to incorporate those comments on your check prints. I believe that this plan is now ready for approval and would ask that we schedule a time when the tracings can be signed. Would you please acknowledge this to me so that this construction can occur. Again, thank you for your continued cooperation. RWF:pms encs. Very truly yours, c4.0 etiQ Robert.W. Faulk cc: John Sutti (w/ encs.) • .,, 2 0 1980 SAN MATEO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, N MARY LOU LANE i, motet 0S890.R.33E1 N60°55'50"E +N6r22'2 293.69' N62°21'50" E 690 OR. 4901 246.17' PARCEL 2 0.624 AC.± P. Fs' it 1:5 PAR �, i. 1�/1:—�>, i s G _- iS ( =r iJ P )Yi C: S N62"21'DO"E 4676 / 1,• r / 1)33 N. 1 FINS RENEFI? OF PARCEL i EASEMENT AB, MIOr..4RgP,0 PARR'�NE MS�MEX! fl.: ° ELE 9iS TC 1025y ~ ERRING SLEY. le 1"R2t,s7 0 24' F ..v., w i er+Ei n „r • nII N62°21'50•E 8 1162°41'50'2 1v 313M' 3473 SITS' 1162"21'502 '9 $ 1 _ � ^1 C F 0 a 70 33'{ x Ne7°VWc.: PARCEL I 0.415 AC.* ;341 EASEMENT ~•�'+� / 146 PMr66',PROVL'MENTS PAL, --- S7(931'204w S ..E:JI, ff !71.54' 571 31 t0 16¢.46' 146.2•-'�- 261h PLACE , 1 IB.I4' --* Llf L!1 CC 2 25' 4.1 25' R A W 11 • -r 016' 1011.65' S 60255' 50"vi { 340"00'NI FOR BENEFIT OF PARCEL I E.1250S,16 EA5`NCNT"'EM 18570 OR SKI 101.35 LEGEND FOUND CHISELED CROSS • FOUND 3/4' IRON PIPE FOUND I" IRON PIPE WITH TAG -R.C.E. NO. 13776 ) INDICATES RECORD DATA • NOTES: ' I. "0600-2610 26TH PLACE, A CONDOMINIUM SUSDIVISION, CITY OF SAN MATEO, SAN MATEO CO)NTY, CALIFORNIA" IS A MAP OF A PROJECT AS THE TERN I5 • DEFINED iN SECTION 1350(3) OF TILE 61v1L CODE OF THE STATE OF 62)1,4008810 ANO THE 5L00501010N DEPICTED HEREON i5 SUBJECT TO THE PR0Vi510NS OF THE CALIFORNIA COND7MINi011 ACT, TITLE 6, PART 4, DIV15109 SECOND OF THE CIVIL CODE. • 2. "CONDOMINIUM" SHALL MEAN AN ESTATE IH REAL PROPERTY AS DEFINED 1N THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 783 CONSISTING OF AN UNOIVEOED (N0EREST IN A COMMON AREA TOGETHER V1TM AN INTEREST IN A UNIT 1NCLUO194 CERTAIN EA5ENE!RS APPURTENANT TO SUCH UNIT. FOR THE PURPOSE OP THESE RESTRICT- IONS, 111E OWNERSHIP OF EACH CONDOMINIUM SHALL INCLUDE A UNIT TOGETHER WITH THE EASEMENTS APPURTENANT TO SUCH UNIT, THE RESPECTIVE UNDIVIDED INTERESTS IN THE COMMON AREA AND A MEMBERSHIP IN THE ASSOCIATION HERE- INAFTER DEFINED. - . 3. "PROJECT.. WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1350(3) IS SUBJECT TO THE P1100121040 CF THE CALIFORNIA CONDOMINIUM ACT (TITLE 6, PART 4, 010I01ON SECOND OF THE CIVIL COCE). "UNIT, SHALL MEAN THE ELEMENTS OF A CONDOMINIUM WHICH ARE NOT OWNED IN COMMON WITH THE GAM OF OTHER CGNDONINIUMS. EACH UNIT IS A NUMBERED PARCEL AS SHOWN ON THE MAP. THE BOUNDARY LINES OF EACH UNIT ARE A5 DEFINED UNDER CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1303(7). ALL BOLDING VALLS AND ALL WALLS OF. UNITS ARE AT RIGHT ANGLES TO EACH OTHER UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 6, ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SNOWIt ARE IN FEET AHD DECIMALS THEREOF. 5. 7. ALL WALL THICKNESSES ANE AS NOTED ON THE UNIT D)MENSIDN PLAN. B. 9. IN INTERPRETING DEEDS AND OTHER DCCJMCNYS IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SUBDIVISION MP, THE E0(5T1NS PHYSICAL BOUNDARIES OF THE G'NIT CR OF A UNIT RECONSTRUCTED' HIV SUD5TANTIAL 'ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORIGINAL PLANS THEREOF SHALL BE CONCLUSIVELY PRESUME0 TO BE ITS BOUNDARIES RATHER THAN THE 6000702165 AS EXPRESSED AND DELINEATED ON THIS 55001V12109 MAP, REGARDLESS OF SETTLING OR LATERAL +50060ENT OF THE BUILDING OR REGARDLESS OF MINOR VAR)AHC£ BETWEEN BOUNDARIES 1HO01NG ON SAID MAP AND THOSE OF THE BUILDING. THE RIGHTS OF EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE PROVIDERS OF EMERGENCY SERVICES , ARE RE5ERVE0 ACROSS ALL ORIVEWA05 AND 022006NT5 HEREON. • 30. EACH AREA DESIGNATED 111TH A "0" ACID A NUMBER 15 A BALCONY, THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF WHICH IS RESERVED TO THE OWNER OF THE CORRESPONDINGLY NUMBERED UNIT. I1. EACH AREA DESIGNATED WITH A "P" AND A NUMBER IS A PARKING SPACE THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF WHICH IS TO BE ASSIGNED BY THE ASSOCIATION. 12. MEASUREMENT OF DIMENSIONS AND TOLERANCES: ALL INTERIOR 010280ION5 511017N ANO ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE MEASURED TO THE UNFINISHED INTERIOR SURFACES OF THE WALLS, FLOORS, AND CEILINGS. FLOOR AND CEILING ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE SUBJECT TO A VERTICAL TOLERANCE OF (PLUS OR 011100) SIX INCHES. THE LOCATION OF THE PERIMETER VALLS OF EACH UNIT AS 5HOWH HEREON IS SUBJECT TO A HORIZONTAL TOLERANCE OF (PLUS OR MINUS) SIX INCHES. CONDOMINIUM .PLAN - 2600 -2610 26th PLACE LYING C0ITHIN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO COUNTY OF SAN MA:00, CALIFORNIA BEING A RESUBDiVISION OF PARCELS A 6, B OF PARCEL NAP 228 FILED IN VOi3U0E 48 OE PARCEL YAP AT PAGE 88 SAN MATE0 COUNTY RECORDS CITY OF SAN MATEO SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE 1" = 20' DATE: MARCH, 1900 BRIAN •KANGAS•FOULK& ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS 695 Price Avenue • flodwood City. CA 94093 • 741.(413) 366.0412 SHEET 2 OF 3 C-79171-2 ARCHITECT'S FIELD ORDER AIA DOCUMENT C708 • t111Nti; \RI. III lIt 1 t (1NbUt IANI� (Tt)NTRA( 1OR 11.11) OTHER Jack • PROJECT: Eureka Federal Savings, FIELD ORDER NO: (name, address) San Mateo OWNER: TO (Contractor) L Eggli Landscaping 972 Terminal Way San Carlos, California 94070 DATE: 4/7/.81 12 I ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 2 1 4 CONTRACT FOR: Landscape work J CONTRACT DATE: You are hereby directed to execute promptly this Field Order which interprets the Contract Documents or (titters minor changes in the Work without change in Contract Sum or Contract Time. If you consider that a change in Contract Sum or Contract Time is required, please submit your itemized proposal to the Architect immediately and before proceeding with this Work. If your proposal is found to be satisfactory and in proper order, this Field Order will in that event be superseded by a Change Order. Description:- (Here insert a written descnphon of the mtetpretatton or change) 1. Revise landscaping in area adjacent to .apartment building. 2. Miscellaneous landscape and plant list revisions. Attachments: (Here inset! luting of attached dio:uments that ul:t ;,t dru:.l;:o:n Two copies drawings L —I through L-6, revision 3/12/81 ARCHITECT: BY: iam Robson,AIA JOHN SUTTI & ASSOCIATES PLANNERS • DESIGNERS • BU,LDERS 127 NORTH CARMAN AVE . EAUR! INC;•;ME, CA 940i0 J4i'.::il 1,6 AIA DOCUMENT G748 • ARCHITECT'S HUD ORDER • APRII. 1970 EDITION • AIA* • u 1970 ONE PAGE THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 173 NEW YORK AVE., Nw. WASHINGTON, D.C. ?u0O6 CITY OF SAN MATEO TREASURERS RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM � 3R1-11 ADDRESS 73 "-i /U arc't N� �� 7?-/ 7 7 CONTROL N° 16178 DATE j -Z5' --"jD AMOUNT $ L c0 0 00 W0 O j (Vet . j hQ AMOUNT ( PLEASE PRINT DESCRIPTION 28 SPACES COMMENTS 1 0 D 0 0 0 c) 5 (o -z, ° 5O�.-0o 5 j U l3 r of) /AP FFC-C- 0:1 IJ A L) Tuts Z.-' c.S .-,. ,, UUO 6 (b bOhiri 26 FINANCE FORM 033 300.00 ) t. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY CASHIER 3-1-712 Cil (-As-rd) �NOf&-?kr EQ S o vlei-, 9� 1/ 1 / / Y 011.7 r/ /1 .�. 6't15 ta �.- ? M' t vtr UAL LiG4r4 CEI tH Vii- 1980 SAN MATED PUB? !C WORKS DEPT. Bell Electrical Signs, Inc. 1320 Marsten Road, Burlingame, Ca. 94404 Jan. 29, 1980 L AC!$ N INSURANCE VERIFICATION Date: 11- 9- 79 PL/PD 1 • 738 Expiration Date: -5-80 R\ .) 1,47 S DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. In accordance with the San Mateo City Site Development Code, Chapter 23.40 S.M.M.C., permission is granted to: i; t om• Address 1 327 ` .. Cart4 av` 5uC�� J e,Ck 94.0ca Phone (1-7 2 ! 05T Name Date of Issue /f' Commence Work By /6P' yep•.. ,) Complete Work By 1/ - to grade and/or remove major vegetation from private property described below: Address or locational description OV000 ` aCo S • .. ` C-aPAI hb Qe.4 in accordance with the following attached approved plans and specifications and attached special conditions of P.A. No. TES t This application has fulfilled all requirements of the Site Development and Heritage Tree Regulations according to hearings duly held by: Board of Zoning Adjustments il , City Council (date) Action of (1.1 -be issued. , Planning Commission (date) was final on ( Go 7e) ate) and permit may for Permittce (date ].an in• �ivison (date) / ks & Recreation Department (date) Department f Public Works (date) 011 In order to obtain the inspections required by Article 23.40.150 S.M.M.C., permittee shall notify Engineering Division at: (574-6790); and, where applicable, the Landscape Resources Division at: (574-6740) at least one (1) full working day before the follow- ing inspections are to be made: INSPECTION: A. Initial Inspection Date B. Rough Grading Date Final Inspection Date c. APPROVAL: Inspector Inspector Inspector Work authorized by this permit has. to the best of my knowledge, performed: Date Date FEE AND DEPOSIT DATA: 10-00-00.00--362-00 11-00-00.00--362-00 10-00-00.00-254- Tr Director of Parks & Recreation City Engineer been satisfactorily PA NO. PA NO.:, P.W. Plan Check Fee Park Plan Check Fee PA NO. - 'i Site Inspection Deposit Original to Public Works Dept. -- VALIDATION -- When properly validated, this ie your.receipt. • 1L, Copies To: Permittee Park Dept. Planning Div. Chief Inspector. FORM DM•M-P-202 (REV. 1-76) STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT John Sutti & Associates, Inc. 1327 North Carolan Avenue Burlingame, CA 94010 , Permittee No. 419-E-771316 San Francisco California October 11 19 79 in compliance with your request of .. September. _ 27 - 19.7.9....and subject to all the terms, conditions and restrictions written below or printed as general or special provisions on any part of this form and/or attached hereto. PERMISSION IS .HERESY GRANTED TO remove driveway and construct curb, gutter and sidewalk, and install two tree wells south of 25th Avenue on the westerly side of State Highway 04-SM-82, Post Mile 10.0. Three days before work is started under this permit, notice shall be given to, and approval of construction details, opera- tions, public safety, and traffic control shall be obtained from Senior Highway Maintenance Superintendent T. J. Hafley, P. 0. Box 4306, Foster City, 94404, 572-0911. Your attention is directed to the General Provisions herein, and to the attached Special Provisions, Nos. 1, 11A, 12, 20 and 25, which must be complied with. Tree planting details shall con.rorm as applicable to the Special Provisions for Tree Planting Along Conventional Highways attached hereto. Permittee shall contact State's representative for final inspection and approval of completed work. When applicable, permittee shall comply with Attachment "A". This permit is to be strictly construed and no work other than . that specifically mentioned above is authorized hereby. This permit shall be void unless the work herein contemplated shall have been completed before. _ .December 1 1979._ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By T. R. _LAMMERS_ t.t l.ertor of Transportation I`' hw•t "III' rrnw`-Mmr CITY OF SAN MATEC N° 13 510 CONTROL TREASURERS RECEIPT DATE ,I/f1 i ! J RECEIVED FROM ` /-bi I St) 777. 4, ,; CtY' AMOUNT (0/ ADDRESS / J i 7 4 0//?/)1- / 41, Rt'?tilt.164/22r 97/0/0 o o v 1..: (m- (PLEAsEPR/Nr)AMOUNT DESCR/PT/ON COMMENTS ) , ,,?"5.-.f ;:? J' _3(7-6 L}G CZ? ?,Z',✓ 4IZZ:•6'1-' -�K _ 'G, f1� '•L72/?l)r ? 11 1Pc (7_ �v rt <" -,6;s ' FINANCE FORM 033 t. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY J C SHIER/AGENT 3-I-712 ' JN1 1 ED STATES FIDELITY -.:AND .GUARAN 1 Y COMPANY (A Stock Company) Ho 73-0120-7470-79 MAINTENANCE BOND KNOW ALL flEN N BY THESE PRESF;NTS $ 25.00_ That John Sutti and Associates, Inc. as Principal and the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CCE-lYNY, a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of I aryland and authorized to do a suret business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firm bound unto .City of San Mateo in the sum of Nine Thousand One Hundred Sixty and No/100 Dollars ($9,160.00 ), lawful money of the United States of America for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made we bind ourselves our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly prd severally, firmly by these presents. Sealed with our seals and dated this 25th day of September 19 79 . S R S, John Sutti and Associates, Inc. - as Contractor was awarded the contra ct for Landscape -Installation for the sum of Forty -Six Thousand Six Hundred Eighty -Seven & No/100--- Dollars; (S 46, 687.00 ) and Jt EREAS, under the terms of the specifications for said work, the said John Sutti And Associates, Inc. is required to give a bond equal to ( ;4) per cent of the amount of the contract to protect against the result of tvv materials or t�:or'� r.anship for a • period ofEighteer( 18) from and after the date of the completion and acceptance of srne by City of San Mateo I'ow, therefore, if the said John Sutti and Associates, Inc. shall T; nf'of Months a �� .�, the r for a pe_lo.� 18 yeaws from n�ru ai e date of the completion and acceptance of same by City of San Mateo replace any and all defects arising in said work, whether resulting from defective materials or defective workmanship, then the above obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. • . John Sutti and Associates, Inc. By: - - - • UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY BY:// R. C. Kahn - ttornev-in-Fact r • ATTORNEY -IN -FACT AFFIDAVIT SfATE OR COMMONWEALTH OF California COUNTY OR CITY OF San Francisco ss: Before me, a Notary Public, personally came R . C. Kahn known to me, and known to be the Attorney -in -Fact of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland Corporation, which executed the attached bond as surety, who deposed and said that his signa- ture and the corporate seal of said United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company were affixed by order and authority of said Company's Board of Directors, and that the execution of the attached bond is the free act and deed of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Given under my hand and seal this 25th - day of tember ,1979 . My Commission expires Jud. 876 (9-57) 3111111/111111 BILLIE M. RI SON NOTARY PUBLIC — CALIFORNIA CITY : COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO My Commission Expires May 24, 1983 otary Public. " CERTIFIED COPY s GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY No. 88167 Know all Men by these Presents: That UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, and having its principal office at the City of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland, does hereby constitute and appoint J. F. Hallisey, R. C. Kahn, Billie M. Richardson and Bertha Z. Martin of the City of San Francisco , State of California its true and lawful attorney9 in and for the States of California and Nevada for the following purposes, to wit: To sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, and to respectively do and perform any and all acts and things set forth in the resolution of the Board of Directors of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a certified copy of which is hereto annexed and made a part of this Power of Attorney; and the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, through us, its Board of Directors, hereby ratifies and confirms all and whataoeverViVf (dC anyone of the said J. F. Hallisey and the said R. C. Kahn and the said Billie M. Richardson and the said Bertha Z. Martin may lawfully do in the premises by virtue of these presents. In Witness Whereof, the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY has caused this instrument to be sealed with its corporate seal, duly attested by the signatures of ita Vice -President and Assistant Secretary, this 30th day of September , A. D. 19 77 UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY. (Signed) By.... Charles W. Boone Vice" Presitlent. (SEAL) STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE CITY, } aa: (Signed) Michael B. Casey Assistant Secretary. On this . 30th day of September , A. D. 197 7, before me personally came Charles W. Boone " , Vice -President of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and Michael B. Casey , Assistant Secretary of said Company, with both of whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me severally duly sworn, said that they, the said Charles W. Boone and Michael B. Casey were respectively the Vice -President and the Assistant Secretary of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney; that they each knew the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said Power of Attorney was such corporate seal, that it was so fixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, andthat they signed their names thereto by like order as Vice -President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of the Company. My commission expires the first day in July, A. D. 19 78 (SEAL) (Signed) STATE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE CITY, s Sct. Margaret M. Hurst Notary Public. L Robert H. Bouse , Clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, which Court is a Court of Record, and has a seal, do hereby certify that Margaret M. Hurst , Esquire, before whom the annexed affidavits were made, and who has thereto subscribed his name, was at the time of so doing a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, in and for the City of Baltimore, duly commissioned and sworn and authorized by law to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, or proof of deeds to be recorded therein. I further certify that I am acquainted with the handwriting of the said Notary, and verily believe the signature to be his genuine signature. In Teatinwn Whereof, 1 hereto set my hand and affix the seal of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, the same being a Court of Record, this  0t h day of September , A. D. 19 77 Robert H. Bouse (SEAL) (Signed) FS 3 (6-77) Clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City. u��: COPY OF RESOLUTION That Whereas, it is necessary for the effectual transaction of business that this Company appoint agents and attorneys with power and authority to act for it and in its name in States other than Maryland, and in the Territories of the United States and in the Provinces of the Dominion of Canada and in the Colony of Newfoundland. Therefore, be it Resolved, that this Company do, and it hereby does, authorize and empower its President or either of its Vice - Presidents in conjunction with its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretaries, under its corporate seal, to appoint any person or persons as attorney or attorneys -in -fact, or agent or agents of said Company, in its name and as its act, to execute and deliver any and all con- tracts guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding positions of public or private trust, guaranteeing the performances of contracts other than insurance policies and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings, required or permitted in all actions or proceedings, or by law allowed, and Also, in its name and as its attorney or attorneys -in -fact, or agent or agents to execute and guarantee the conditions of any and all bonds, recognizances, obligations, stipulations, undertakings or anything in the nature of either of the same, which are or may by law, municipal or otherwise, or by any Statute of the United States or of any State or Territory of the United States or of the Provinces of the Dominion of Canada or of the Colony of Newfoundland, or by the rules, regulations, orders, customs, practice or discretion of any board, body, organization, office or officer, local, municipal or otherwise, be allowed, required or permitted to be executed, made, taken, given, tendered, accepted, filed or recorded for the security or protection of, by or for any person or persons, corporation, body, office, interest, municipality or other association or organization whatsoever, in any and all capacities whatsoever, conditioned for the doing or not doing of anything or any conditions which may be provided for in any such bond, recognizance, obligation, stipulation, or undertaking, or anything in the nature of either of the same. I, Mark F. Bayer an Assistant Secretary of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original power of attorney given by said Company to J. F. Hallisey, R. C. Kahn, Billie M. Richardson and Bertha Z. Martin of San Francisco, California , authorizing and empowering them to sign bonds as therein set forth, which power of attorney has never been revoked and is still in full force and effect. And I do further certify that said Power of Attorney was given in pursuance of a resolution adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said Company, duly called and held at the office of the Company in the City of Baltimore, on the 11th day of July, 1910, at which meeting a quorum of the Board of Directors was present, and that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of said resolution, and the whole thereof as recorded in the minutes of said meeting. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY on September 25, 1979 (Date) \Ak„„t_i4- Assistant Secretary. t ___n'.i�••'•5.'r. ;:� ! v, r r�5 c: i '/ : st:; •i'4 afi if +. s : sr� u o ^ s •rz y 5'• fq y, M1;� (M1r. $4's.. .i r . r ,. ''%sib ... 'dJ ... ... ... .. .:.' :iV ........ ,w . ..: k•J'... UNITED S-: -ATES H DE PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE BOND AR ANTY COM )ANY BOND NO 73-0120-7469-79 (The premium charged on this bond is $ 560.00 , being at the rate of $ 12' 00 per thousand of the contract price) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, John Sutti and Associates, Inc. as Principal, and UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City of San Mateo in the sum of Forty -Six Thousand Six Hundred Eighty -Seven & No/100 , as Obligee, Dollars ($ 46, 687.00 ), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has been awarded and has entered into a contract dated with said Obligee to do and perform the following work, to -wit; Landscape Installation as will more fully appear in said contract, reference to which is hereby made. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if the above bounden Principal shall well and truly perform, or cause to be performed, each and all of the requirements and obligations of said contract to be performed by said Principal, as in said contract set forth, then this bond shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, sealed with our seals, and dated September 25 , 19 79 John Sutti and Associates, Inc. By: (Seat) Principal UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY By ;..r/ �,/i'1 - ,. _, (Seal) R. C. Kahn Attorney -in -fact AO . ;i.;r v , .. •� t p. Contract 237 (California) (7.78) " ATTORNEY -IN -FACT AFFIDAVIT STATE OR COMMONWEALTH OF��____1i fornia COUNTY OR CITY OF San Francisco ss: Before me, a Notary Public, personally came R. ' C. Kahn known to me, and known to be the Attorney -in -Fact of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland Corporation, which executed the attached bond as surety, who deposed and said that his signa- ture and the corporate seal of said United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company were affixed by order and authority of said Company's Board of Directors, . and that the execution of the attached bond is the free act and deed of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Given under my hand and seal this 2 5th My Commission expires dud. 876 (9-67) day of ember , 7 g u..rrrrrrnnnr" arr�%rrnr ttspematIlINOtarY Public. BILLIE M. RICHARDSON e NOTARY PU ! IC  CAiJFORNIA CITY , COijr y "'T SAN FRANCISCO My Commission Expires May 24, 1983 tur. ar L NI ::x: �J"'` ._ •�! '.•NIiR .•:+te' �t:;� . tr.•'`.-. - 1 ED STATES IF .. P$'� •,t4:;.•xr ..:7. M1" •-r+•A44.. A. ::3.JJtl 4 . •p?Sss f ii �. ys.. y ..V, '•i5,'.. M14 xa� 4, t •1.. F ��FtpEIITY,py fA Stock Company) R. AN-1FY COM BOND No. 73-0120-7469-79 PUBLIC WORKS PAYMENT BOND (Premium included in Performance Bond) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, John Sutti and Associates, Inc. ?ANY as Principal, and UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland and authorized to transact surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto _ City of San Mateo as Obligee, in the sum of Twenty -Three Thousand Three Hundred Forty -Three and 50/100 -- Dollars ($ 23'343.50 1, lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has been awarded and has entered into a contract, dated , with said Obligee to do and perform the following work, to -wit: Landscape Installation as will more fully appear in said contract, reference to which is hereby made; and, WHEREAS, said Principal is required by the provisions of Chapter 7, Title 15, Part 4, Division 3 of the Civil Code to furnish a bond in connection with said contract, as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF •THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if said Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, or subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or teams, implements or machinery used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, as required by the provisions of Chapter 7, Title 15, Part 4, Division 3 of the Civil Code, and provided that the claimant shall have complied with the provisions of said Code, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Franchise Tax Board from the wages of employees of the Principal and his subcontractors pursuant to Section 18806 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, with respect to such work and labor, the Surety hereon will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond; otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In case suit is brought upon this bond, the said Surety will pay a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the court. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Section 3181 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought uponthis bond. September 25 79 SIGNED, sealed with our seals, and dated ,19.... John Sutti and Associates, Inc. By: By.: !Seal) Principal UNIT TES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY R. C. Kahn Attorney -in -fact (Seal) .............................................................,«:� .� �. �.,..":,� 0. ,":;�zr: , � ,. .�?"t., x3 `'�4�,:.v+ ,,..,. .} ......". ,.. ....,,_.�., , .,.. ..�.ys4 }f1(F'i. ,L t��'�4Tz Contract 238 (California) (7-7a) .ewe ATTORNEY -IN -FACT AFFIDAVIT ;TATE OR COMMONWEALTH OF %t�lif�rnia COUNTY OR CITY OF -.n Francisco Before me, a Notary Public, personally came known to me, and known to be the Attorney -in -Fact of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a "aryland Corporation, which executed the attached bond as surety, who deposed and said that his signa- "e and the corporate seal of said United States Fidelity. and Guaranty Company were affixed by order rd authority of said Company's Board of Directors, and that the execution of the attached bond is the act and deed of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Given under my hand and seal this - Lb _ day of. My Commission expires Jud. 816 (9-57) r i'avas»oom mavP tether ao1 ,19 ' B LLIE M. Rl ' _ � DSON Lary Public. �;OTh Y P;}D,LKC — CALIFORNIA CITY 1 COUNTY OF -SAN FRANCISCO E My Commission Expires May 24, 1983 uu>sDIIIUIIus I ---H I wuIIIU Mir " CERTIFIED COPY GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY No. 88167 Know aU Men by these Presents: That UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, and having its principal office at the City of Baltimore, in the State of Maryland, does hereby constitute and appoint J. F. Hallisey, R. C. Kahn, Billie M. Richardson and Bertha Z. Martin of the City of San Francisco its true and lawful attorneys in and for the States of California and Nevada ,5tateof California for the following purposes, to wit: To sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, and to respectively do and perform any and all acts and things set forth in the resolution of the Board of Directors of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a certified copy of which is hereto annexed and made a part of this Power of Attorney; and the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, through us, its Board of Directors, hereby ratifies and confirms all and whatsoeverXWMIC anyone of the said J. F. Hallisey and the said R. C. Kahn and the said Billie M. Richardson and the said Bertha Z. Martin may lawfully do in the premises by virtue of these presents. In Witness Whereof, the said UNITED STATES. FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY has caused this instrument to be sealed with its corporate seal, duly attested by the signatures of its Vice -President and Assistant Secretary, this 30th day of September , A. D. 19 77 UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY. ( Signed) Br.... Charles W. Boone (Sif @d) Michael B. Casey (SEAL) STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE CITY, ss: V ice" Presidens. Assistant Secretary. On this " 30th day of September , A. D. 197 7 , before me personally came Charles' W. Boone , Vice -President of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and Michael B. Casey , Assistant Secretary of said Company, with both of whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me severally duly sworn, said that they, the said Charles W. Boone and Michael B. Casey were respectively the Vice -President and the Assistant Secretary of the said UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney; that they each knew the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said Power of Attorney was such corporate seal, that it was so fixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that they signed their names thereto by like order as Vice -President and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of the Company. 7 a My commission expires the first day in July, A. D. 19 (SEAL) (Signed) STATE OF MARYLAND } Set. CITY, , 1, Robert H. Bouse , Clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, which Court is a Court of Record, and has a seal, do hereby certify that Margaret M. Hurst , Eaquire, before whom the annexed affidavits were made, and who has thereto subscribed his name, was at the time of so doing a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, in and for the City of Baltimore, duly commissioned and sworn and authorized by law to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, or proof of deeds to be recorded therein. I further certify that I am acquainted with the handwriting of the said Notary, and verily believe the signature to be his genuine signature. In Testimony Whereof, I hereto set my hand and affix the seal of the Superior Court of Baltimore City, the same being a Court of Record, this 30th day of September , A. D. 19 77 Robert H. Bouse Margaret M. Hurst Notary Public. (SEAL) (Signed) FS 3 (6-77) Clerk of the Superior Court of Baltimore City. 4� COPY OF RESOLUTION That Whereas, it is necessary for the effectual transaction of business that this Company appoint agents and attorneys with power and authority to act for it and in its name in States other than Maryland, and in the Territories of the United States and in the Provinces of the Dominion of Canada and in the Colony of Newfoundland. Therefore, be it Resolved,that this Company do, and it hereby does, authorize and empower its President or either of its Vice. Presidents in conjunction with its Secretary or one of its Assistant Secretaries, under its corporate seal, to appoint any person or persons as attorney or attorneys -in -fact, or agent or agents of said Company, in its name and as its act, to execute and deliver any and all con- tracts guaranteeing the fidelity of persons holding positions of public or private trust, guaranteeing the performances of contracts other than insurance policies and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings, required or permitted in all actions or proceedings, or by law allowed, and Also, in its name and as its attorney or attorneys -in -fact, or agent or agents to execute and guarantee the conditions of any and all bonds, recognizances, obligations, stipulations, undertakings or anything in the nature of either of the same, which are or may by law, municipal or otherwise, or by any Statute of the United States or of any State or Territory of the United States or of the Provinces of the Dominion of Canada or of the Colony of Newfoundland, or by the rules, regulations, orders, customs, practice or discretion of any board, body, organization, office or officer, local, municipal or otherwise, be allowed, required or permitted to be executed, made, taken, given, tendered, accepted, filed or recorded for the security or protection of, by or for any person or persons, corporation, body, office, interest, municipality or other association or organization whatsoever, in any and all capacities whatsoever, conditioned for the doing or not doing of anything or any conditions which may be provided for in any such bond, recognizance, obligation, stipulation, or undertaking, or anything in the nature of either of the same. I, Mark F. Boyer an Assistant Secretary of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the original power of attorney given by said Company to J. F. iiallisey, R. C. Kahn, Billie M. Richardson and Bertha Z. Martin of San Francisco, C a 1 i f o r n i a , authorizing and empowering them to sign bonds as therein set forth, which power of attorney has never been revoked and is still in full force and effect. And I do further certify that said Power of Attorney was given in pursuance of a resolution adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said Company, duly called and held at the office of the Company in the City of Baltimore, on the 11th day of July, 1910, at which meeting a quorum of the Board of Directors was present, and that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of said resolution, and the whole thereof as recorded in the minutes of said meeting. In Testimony 1 have hereunto set 25, �my hand and the seal of the UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY on September (Date) \Akaia— Assistant Secretary. • i September 11, 1919 ?qtr. lobert N. Braun Charles and Braun, Consulting Engineers 121 Second Street San Francisco, CA $41:)5 e: 2600 E1 Canino ';Rai Your Job no. .2166 Dar ob: received your letter of August 29, 1979. The dares for the sanitary sewer look fine. Your scheme of diachar,e of the rain water collected in the lower basement is also satisfactory. Thank you for letting us look at the plans; so that we can coordinate this project and move it along at an acceptable pace. Very truly yours, ROBERT C. 3EZZANT DIRrCToF OF PUBLIC WOR1S ELFIR R J. SCRAM, ASSOCIATE EMIINEER RC} :EJS:Yw-20 1 • CHARLES/and/BRAUN //CONSULTING ENGINEERS 121 Second Street San Francisco / California 94105 (415) 434-2720 August 29, 1979 City of San Mateo Public Works Department 320 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, California 94403 Re: Apartments and Office Building 26th Place & El Camino Real San Mateo. Our Job No. 2168. Gentlemen: Pig 1' Enclosed is the site plan, Sheet P-1, indicating the sanitary sewer connection and rainwater disposal for the above project. The project consists of 18 apartments and 3 floors of offices over 2 garage levels. There is a sanitary sewer manhole at the intersection of Edison and 26th Place, to which we can discharge the sanitary sewage from the entire project. There is also a minor amount of rainwater collected in the lower basement level, which is to be pumped up to tf _curb. We intend to discharge this water into a bubble box at the curb and allow it to drain by gravity through the sidewalk into the gutter. We would appreciate your comments and recommendations with respect to obtaining appropriate approval for sewer connection and rainwater disposal for this project. Very truly yours, CHARLES/AND/BRAUN//CONSULTING ENGINEERS :t- 0 -6,"e- /Z ZUi-z- Robert H. Braun Mechanical Engineer RHB.dar Enc. CC: John Sutti & Associates Richard A. Charles, P.E. • Robert H. Braun, P.E_ / Gordon T. Oldham, P.E. • John W. Potter • Carson Woo ;f9rops�C0 I'Velt,SC c/ era./ deS'Ci-/ a .. >1 0/0 CS /707 0 G 710 4 a3 7 -- /77-62a/ 4e O3? -/77-026 'P63 3?f ,.5Z 4-Pb39- 37/- 62,-0 J c53 9 _ 5 7/- 030 r 7- 37/--‘71-Z Q'4) n r/ m Gi't ce fr- lar G�rnvr� //n sz �� ! �L ✓ Q� 7 S 2 o 074 4 C(7 7"x'_/"%14 Y-3 k6/0C-rQ - S / k/ :3) A- fryi-ery-) le/44 y " hf) Alca4 77V-74 7 An /-5000 -7/ / ,J ar 41-"7 lb IX4 /"1 Cyr ¢ /? a 7/t ed -1a Cc n /c€7/ 6/ C-et®c%l-S 7 ��c evq. a4L,2 Cti 6rAliAr"' &xoc. /tA-- J-6- we co..devte zs Attay cetkA4"_ pa/4,,-r T rz.c-/kncii lye /AL, .9.e.4.44744(„Zet; a - t -.//e.'-'47/17///e, c, / 6 Address: �� Q �f Applicant :L2,4,..4./6"/ rar 'Z / Se:7 V r PA 71- A -,/ Date: (11) (B) (8) (8) (i) (8) (B) (C) vA) A) (A). (A) (8) (A) '15 Site Develo ment Permit (B) 16 Standard Co,: ercial Driveway . . . . . a = (B) 17 Standard Residential Driveway . . - a (A) 18 Storm Drainage Study (B) 19 Street Improvements 02 Beautification Program 03 Charges for City Services 5-Q i SCE 04 Curb, Gutter: & Sidewalk . L ' .k.4./. .. ":24-a Sq. Ft. VW 05 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalks ' a = Sq. Ft. C & G 06 Drainage r't/ ,. `--.5/fail 044g 16--)Y re., 07 General (, 44'' 08 Modify Exist. Street Light a =4 / St. Lights 09.Parcel Map 10 Parking - 11 Permits, .Bonds__and insurance -- 12 Permits Required by Other Agencies 13 Sewer Line Capacity Study 14 .Sewers (B) 20 Street Light Base a = (B) 21 Street Light a = (A) 22 Traffic Study (8) 23 Underground Utilities 24 Working in State Fight of Way (8) 25 Dedications a (B) 35 (P -CD -d) Debris Removal Driveways Driveways Ft. ; b Ft. Bases St. Lights' Ft. ; b Ft. " tie _/pd,/( PE-F2L/ 14 ,7000 .20b Fe!' Draft Traffic Study EUREKA FEDERAL SAVINGS PROJECT El Camino Real Near 25th Avenue City of San Mateo, California Prepared for CITY OF SAN MATEO Department of Community Development Planning Division By BARNARD C. JOHNSON, P.E. Traffic Engineering Consultant December 22, 1978 " " TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TECHNICAL EVALUATION 1 Existing Conditions 2 Vehicle Trip Generation 7 Trip Distribution and Assignment 8 Traffic Impact Evaluation 8 CONCLUSION 9 APPENDICES: Appendix A. Level of Service Guidelines Appendix B. Existing Level of Service Appendix C. Vehicle Access Assignments BCJ • ! PE Draft Traffic Study EUREKA FEDERAL SAVINGS PROJECT El Camino Real Near 25th Avenue City of San Mateo, California This traffic study has focused on the proposed Planned Development project by Eureka Federal Savings & Loan at the subject location. Residential, commercial and office uses are proposed for the 46,544 square foot "L" -shaped lot fronting on El Camino Real and on 26th Place. This report includes tabulations to facilitate comparisons of the numerical values for existing and future land use and traffic conditions. Definitions of traffic flow quality are discussed in terms of level of service with existing conditions as a base. The land use assumptions are essentially those exist- ing today plus the proposed development. TECHNICAL EVALUATION The study has been at a general level of detail and was intended to provide an overview assessment of traffic impact of the proposed development. The basic intent was to consider the proposed development as a whole and evaluate the traffic conditions for any possible adverse impacts. If so, it would be known early in the City's project review process whether adverse elements could be avoided and, the street system could operate in a safe and efficient manner. Standard technical methodology has been used incorporating the following elements: Description of existing condition Vehicle trip generation Trip distribution and assignment Traffic impact evaluation " 2 The conclusions reached are based on an independent assessment of the study findings using conservative assumptions. Existing Conditions Understanding the current operation of adjacent intersections is necessary toevaluate the impact of new traffic on that inter- section. This includes an awareness of the conditions experienced by the general public while driving, walking, or observing the intersection. A further point of awareness in the evaluation is the rela- tive degree of concern by the public. Tolerance levels are different in the central business districts of urban street systems (the El Camino Real Corridor in San Mateo, for example) than they are for an outlying arterial, or for a local neighborhood street. In very subjective terms, traffic volume impact might be equivalent as viewed by abutting land owners (tenants) and by motorists for the various classes of streets shown in Table 1. TABLE 1. RELATIVE TRAFFIC VOLUME IMPACTS Equivalent Levels of Concern (Generalized) VOLUME LEVEL OF CLASSIFICATION (Vehicles Per Day) CONCERN Local Street (2 Lanes) 500 Acceptable Collector Street (2-4 Lanes) 5,000 Acceptable Arterial (4-6 Lanes) 20,000 Acceptable In the Eureka Federal Savings (EFS) study area, there are fluctuating volumes associated with residential and commerical land uses. The project area is in a particularly sensitive location. Commercial development depends upon easy vehicular access and high volume levels. The local residential areas (on Edison Street and on 26th Place) are in the opposite category - the lower the traffic volume in front of residences, the better. BCJ • Commuting and general circulation throughout the day produce varying daily and peak -hour volumes. For example, Table 2 shows the relative traffic volume counts in the study area. TABLE 2. DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Estimated and Counted DAILY VOLUME STREET Vehicles Per Day Edison Street 800 28th Avenue 2,600 27th Avenue 4,200 25th Avenue 8,300 El Camino Real 43,000. El Camino Real is a major arterial that operates at critical levels in peak periods. The street is very sensitive to traffic flow irregularities. Tables 3 and 4 show that volumes are at high levels and fairly uniform throughout the late afternoon peak period. Also, the volumes are spread out much more throughout the day (7 AM -7 PM at 72 percent) as compared with a local street like Edison which probably has 85-90 percent of its traffic between 7 AM and 7 PM. TABLE 3. MACHINE TRAFFIC COUNTS 1977 State Traffic Census LOCATION PEAK AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC HOUR Peak. Month Annual North of Hillsdale Blvd. 3,600 43,000 40,000 South of Route 92 4,100 49,500 45,500 BCJ • S PE 4 TABLE 4. MACHINE TRAFFIC COUNTS City of San Mateo, January 20, 1978, Friday South of 27th Avenue TIME DIRECTION Southbound Northbound TOTAL 2 - 3 PM 1,379 1,532 2,911 3 - 4 1,461 1,471 2,932 4 - 5 1,629 1,457 3,086 5 - 6 1,720 1,340 3,060 6 - 7 1,195 1,152 2,347 24 -Hour 20,001 22,654 42,655 12 -Hour (% of 24 -Hour) 14,583 (73%) 16,029 (71%) 30,612 (72%) Peak hour flows have been studied in detail at El Camino Real and 25th Avenue. An earlier traffic count by Caltrans has supplemented the recent counts made for this study. Figure 1 shows the Friday evening peak hour turning movements for the intersection. The intersection is relatively congested and was observed operating at Level -of -Service "D" as shown in Table 5. Pedestrian volumes were very light and did not adversely affect traffic flow. Violations of the red signal display were observed regularly indicating the amount of traffic "pressure" exerted at the intersection. Traffic volumes were sampled at 27th Avenue and El Camino Real and observed for the other streets in the area. The critical lane volume analysis for 25th Avenue and El Camino Real is shown in Appendix B. The resulting critical lane volume of 1,410 vehicles per hour can be compared with the guide- lines in Appendix A and shows the intersection to be operating at Level -of -Service "D". This tolerable operating level has developed over the last three years since 1975 with Level -of - Service "C". Z/OB /Way Dettii,i'r 1, /97B 4,30-5.30PAd 2,00 0/9 1,6/9 1,898 5 /62 32 747 453 AVE. 3 2/6 367 Figure / R4x HOUR VOL/IME 2573/ AVE: ff' EL CAW/NO REAL " 6 TABLE 5. INTERSECTION VOLUMES Turning Movement Summary 25th Avenue & El Camino Real CRITICAL LEVEL DAY/DATE TOTAL PEDESTRIANS LANE OF Time VEHICLES West North East VOLUME SERVICE* Friday, 1 Dec, 78 4:30-5:30 PM Wednesday, 12 Mar. 75 4:30-5:30 PM Saturday, 2 Dec. 78 11:15 AM - 12:15 PM 4,859 42 64 11 1,410 3,708** 44 47 23 1,130 4,306 31 83 26 1,160 ttpll IT UU tic II **Machine counts show the Friday peak hour at 11% higher than for Wednesday. With this adjustment, there has been an increase of about 6 percent per year in intersection volume. *The level -of -service guidelines and discussion are presented in Appendix. A. Traffic conditions on El Camino Real are further described by samples of vehicle travel speeds. As shown in Table 6, the evening peak hour sppeds are at, or below the guideline for Level "D" of about 15 MPH. TABLE 6. VEHICLE TRAVEL SPEEDS El Camino Real - 20th to 28th Avenues DAY/DATE/TIME TRAVEL SPEEDS, MPH Southbound Northbound Friday, December 8, 1978 11-11:20 AM 4:34-5:12 PM Saturday, December 9, 1978 12:05-12:24 PM, and 12:42-12:55 PM 19.9 11.4 19.9 15.4 18.0 20.8 BCJ • . Both Edison Street and 26th Place are narrow with parking at the curb. Although parking spaces are available during the day, these streets cannot be counted on as part of the parking supply for the EFS project. Two-way traffic flow is particularly tight through the corner turn at Edison and 26th Place. Vehicle Trip Generation The residential, commercial and office uses generate traffic at different rates and with different peak -hour characteristics. In tabular form, the differences can be easily seen. Table 7 shows the estimated generation based on standard data (Caltrans and the Institute of Transportation Engineers). TABLE 7. TRIP GENERATION With Mode -Split Estimates LAND USE GENERATION RATE Trips/Unit TRIP GENERATION* Daily Peak Hour Residential 22 Dwelling Units Commercial (EFS) 5,058 Sq. Ft. Drive -Up Window Office 21,000 Sq. Ft. 6/DU 70/1,000 Sq. Ft. 15/1,000 Sq. Ft. 130 14 350 56 100 40 315 47 Sub -Total 895 157 Less Walk -Ins 48 7 TOTAL 847 150 *The number of actual vehicles involved is half the number of trip -ends generated at the site (i.e., one car arriving, parking, and leaving constitutes two trip ends). Thus, the total traffic generated on a daily basis of 850 trips actually constitutes 425 vehicles, making a one-way trip to the site and a one-way trip from the site. BCJ • • Trip Distribution and Assignment Travel to and from the EFS project has been assumed approximately as follows: North: 50% South: 30% East: 10% West: 10% For peak period analysis the travel characteristics are distinctly different. Table 8 shows the net result. TABLE 8. PEAK HOUR TRAVEL By Land -Use Type, Less Pedestrians LAND USE PEAK HOUR TRAVEL In Out Percent Vehicles Percent Vehicles Residential 70 9 30 3 EFS Office 50 25 50 25 EFS Drive -Up 50 20 50 20 Office 15 7 85 41 TOTAL 61 - 89 ESTIMATED PEAK 15 MINUTE FLOW 25 - 40 Detailed assignments are shown in Appendix C. Primary access is via El Camino Real with right turns in and out of EFS. No left turns have been assumed to or from El Camino Real for peak hour analysis. Traffic Impact Evaluation It is clear that the estimated peak -hour traffic impact is relatively small. Less than 100 vehicles per hour are added to the El Camino Real and 25th Avenue intersection (presently carrying 4,860 vehicles per hour). There is an insignificant adverse impact on the critical lane volumes for the intersection. BCJ • • PE 9 Of more relevant concern is the impact on 26th Place. The proportional effect is higher; however, the absolute magnitude is small at an estimated increase of 60 vehicles per hour between EFS and Flores Street. An estimated 34 vehicles per hour could use Edison Street. With the increased turning movements, adequate sight distances and safe turning paths would be important. The interior circulation for the EFS project is workable. However, there are restrictions imposed by the parking aisle pattern. Turning paths for right -turning vehicles cross over into on -coming lanes. With the low volumes estimated, there should be no safety problem. Interrupted flow, inconvenience and some delay can be expected since the main access aisles also serve as parking stalls. CONCLUSION The estimated future traffic increases in the study area would appear to be possible while maintaining a tolerable level of service (Level -of -Service "D") and relative safety at El Camino Real and 25th Avenue. Many cities would like to plan for a Level - of -Service "C" throughout their arterial street system. They also recognize that increased congestion (Level "D") can be tolerated during the peak hours. Left turns should be discouraged to and from El Camino Real. The resulting reduction of delay and accidents will add more traffic to 26th Place and Edison Street. The EFS project frontage on 26th Place should be set back if possible to facilitate vehicular flow through the turn (at 26th & Edison) and to provide for loading and passenger pick-up activity. The RIGHT TURN ONLY regulation for traffic exiting EFS onto 26th Place would only reduce traffic on Edison Street by 15 vehicles per hour. The resulting right turn (which will occur anyway) needs on -street design treatment to avoid the head-on accident potential. Lengthening the driveway about 10 feet would help. " APPENDICES Appendix A. Level of Service Guidelines Appendix B. Existing Level of Service Appendix C. Vehicle Access Assignments 1 • APPENDIX A LEVEL -OF -SERVICE GUIDELINES A Rationale For Quality of Traffic Flow i A-1 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE GUIDELINES In addition to quantity of flow (vehicles per day, or per hour), the street system can be evaluated in terms of quality of flow. This is a subjective term and can be expressed several ways. Given a high enough demand for vehicular travel, most streets will exhibit the following characteristics: Reduced travel speed. Increased travel time. Increased stops and delay. Motorist frustration. Higher collision rates. Traffic volumes can increase to significant levels before congestion starts to deteriorate to beyond what most motorists would regard as a tolerable level. Beyond the tolerance level, small increases in volume produce sharply deteriorating condi- tions to a point where the street cannot carry any more traffic without resulting in jammed, or forced, flow. This is a con- dition where the traffic volume has just reached the capacity of the street. Thus, as traffic volumes increase, a particular street (usually governed by intersections) provides decreasing levels .of service --conditions become less and less desirable. General guidelines have been established by the traffic engineering profession to help describe the level of service provided at intersections. Table 1 shows numerical guidelines and terms for comparative analysis from several equivalent viewpoints. A practical guide for municipal street improvement projects is to design for short peak traffic periods at Level -of -Service "D" on primary and secondary arterials where vehicle travel demands are high and right-of-way is limited. It would be unsafe and a poor traffic management practice to design for a capacity condi- tion (Level "E"). And, although Level "C" is certainly desirable, it usually can be achieved throughout the peak traffic periods only at great public expense through acquisition of additional right-of-way for more traffic lanes. Thus, Level -of -Service "D" is generally used as the motorist tolerance level for intersection evaluation. It is characterized as: . Tolerable delay during the peak hour. . An intersection lane volume summation of 1,400 vehicles per hour (multiple -lane streets would have a higher total volume actually traveling through the intersections). . An Average vehicle spacing (headway) between vehicles of 2.3 seconds and a capacity index of 1.00. TABLE 1. QUALITY OF TRAFFIC FLOW LEVEL OF SERVICE* OVERALL OBSERVED FLOW CONDITION AVERAGE ON STREET SPEED (mph) INTERSECTION VOLUME/ LANE -VOLUME CAPACITY SUMMATION** RATIO (vph) AVERAGE VEHICLE CAPACITY SPACING INDEX (sec) A B C Free Flow (relatively) 30 Stable Flow (slight delay) 25 Stable Flow (acceptable delay) 20 D. Approaching Unstable (tolerable delay) E Unstable (intolerable approx (Capacity) delay) 15 0.70 0.70-0.79 950 0.80-0.89 1,200 15 0.90-0.99 1,400 1.00 1,550 F Forced Flow (jammed) 15 Not Meaningful 3.4 2.7 2.3 2.1 0.65 0.85 1.00 1.10 SOURCE: Highway Capacity Manual (Page 323) and general professional practice. * ** Continued research by the Federal Highway Administration and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (National Academy of Sciences) is refining the concept. At intersections, there is an approximate total number of vehicles per lane for each Level of Service. This number is the total of the highest conflicting traffic volumes per lane and is also referred to as the critical volume. " " APPENDIX B EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 25th Avenue and El Camino Real 1 I 06 ,3,81 13 63 • Izoo31 25TH 222m - /I2 12dcl <75) Phase /Lames 4,63 "9 • /62 /32 -• 453 216 AvE. 367 • Y//1177e 63 63 214 43 222 230 8-1 2577/ AVE. E EL OW/NO REAL Ex/sfing CO/7011./1.012.5 Friday, Dece z' er 1978 4:3o 5:30 ,PAd Tom/ vehicles: .859 Zor7e Wame bee 63 63 294 ; 953 l 1 1 /53 T'OT,4L 1,40 " APPENDIX C VEHICLE ACCESS ASSIGNMENTS r C"% 2SrN Ave. LEGENP .• Ti7iour'd �- — —d OuJ&'w d ef/ Yrliides 89 Ve,4rc%s rar,4z /5, rr ps Jlla�e: .4.s ig.vve.,/ as�irme5 as lel/ lams on El Com%da .feal A of from EFS irgjecl�, C4Alievo REAL VEN/czE ACCESS Ass/6N,wEN 75 " " g (0G 4 " "