Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutParcel Maps - General InstructionsSUBDIVISION FEE SCHEDULE AS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL 4/7/69 * Parcel Map or Subdivision of less than 5 lots $25 .00 $50.00 * Tentative Map These fees are intended to defray the cost of advertising, not the * cost of processing the applications. $50.00 ** Final Map + 5.00/Lot ** If the deposit is not used, the balance will be refunded. If the cost is more, the City will bill the applicant. (refer to letter of March 17, 1970) PENINSULA CHAPTER CALIFORNIA COUNCIL OF CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 3 West 37th Avenue, San Mateo, California 94403 Telephone 341-3896 February 16, 1971 Mr. Robert G. Bezzant, CityEngineer City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, California 94403 Dear Mr. Bezzant: We take pleasure in forwarding herewith a copy of the 1970 Subdivision Map Act as compiled by the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. The amendments incor- porated in this document became effective November 23rd, 1970. One of the member service functions performed by the CCCE&LS is the distribution of the annually amended Map Act so that our membership will be able to operate on the most current information pertaining to the subdivision laws. It is hoped that this document will assist you in the same manner. If you desire additional copies, please feel free to contact any member of our organization. SAK/ors Enclosure Very truly yo I Stanley A. Kangas, President FEB .1 9 1971 !ERA Louis A. Arata William A. Bartlett Frank C. Blomquist Brian, Kangas, Foulk & Associates Construction Engineering and Surveying Co. Frahm, Edler & Associates Howard G. Hickey )ones-Tillson & Associates Kirker-Chapman & Associates Pugh -Noire & Associates Randlett; Clegg & Foulk Timothy D- Sandis & Associates Eidwin H. Smith Tri-State Engineering Co. Robert 0. Wilhelm Wilsey & Ham VTN ..1 "A" Alameda de las Pulgas Amphlett Blvd., South - #1700 - At Ninth Avenue (N.W. Corner) - At Ninth Avenue (N.W. Corner) - At Tilton Avenue - Royal Coach Inn, et al - West side, between Peninsula & State St. 75 121 96 128 139 33 58 "Aquarius Condominium" 114 "Aragonia Condominiums" 103 Arroyo Ct. and Third Avenue 113 Ashwood Ct. 25 Ashwood Ct. & Yew St. 2)+ "B" Baywood Avenue, #39 106 Birch Avenue - At Claremont 71 - At Railroad 90 Borel Avenue - At Bore? Place 105 - At Tilia 133 "Brentwood Condominiums" 122 " " MAP "C" Campus Drive - #3135 116 - At West Hillsdale 1 Carol Way - Laurie Meadows - Jennibelle 32 Casa de Campo - Los Prados - La Selva 39 Catalpa Street 76 "Charter Oak Condominium" 119 "Claremont & Birch Avenue 71 Clark Drive - South side, near El Camino Real - North side, near El Camino Real. 70 81 Clearview Way 49 Concar Drive - At South Delaware, South Grant & 19th Ave. Fwy. 9 - At South Delaware, S.E. Corner 19, 22, 30 - At South Delaware, N.W. Corner 93 - At South Grant, S.E. Corner 41, h11 - At South Grant, S.W. Corner 40, 80 Condon Ct. & Mulberry Ct. 69 Crystal Springs Rd. 62, 67 - Between El Camino Real & S. M. Creek 48 Curtiss & E. 39th (near N.W. corner) 63 " " ("C" cont'd) Cypress Ave. - At Delaware, S.E. Corner - At Idaho, S.W. Corner "D" Dalehurst Ave. MAP 16 5 28 Delaware - At Concar, So. Grant & 19th Ave. Fwy. 9 - At Concar, N.W. Corner 93 - At Concar, S.E. Corner 19, 22, 30 - Between Concar and Grrvey 68 - At Cypress, S.E. Corner " 16 "E" Eaton Road 86 Edgewood Road 52 Edinburgh St., W. side of cul-de-sac, S. of Fwy. 7 Edison St., at 28th Ave. 79, 111+ El Camino Real - At El Cerrito 20 - At Eleventh Ave. 131+ - At Ninth, N.E. Corner 43 - At 19th Ave. Fwy., S.E. Corner 101+ - Near Palm Place 117 - Between Peninsula and State 95 ("E" cont' d) MAP El Camino Real - Near Santa Inez 87, 115 - Between 28th & 31st 8 - At 36th, N.W. Corner 65 El Cerrito at El Camino Real 20 El Dorado Street, North, at Santa Inez Ave., (N.E. corner) 141 Eleventh Ave. at El Camino Real 13)4 Elm Street, near. Mt. Diablo Elm Street, "#141 Elm St. Condominium" 12 136 "F" Fairfax Ave., #242 123 Fiesta Drive 1,10 Fifth Avenue - At Fourth Ave. 102 - At Maple St. 31, 60 Flores St. between 27th & 28th Ave., West side 37 Fourth Ave., at Fifth 102 "G" Glendora at Hillsdale 46 Gramercy Drive 4 Grand Blvd., 0238 - 242 99 " ("G" contvd) MAP Grant Avenue at Concar - And. So. Delaware & 19th Ave. Fury. - N.E. Corner " S.E. Corner - S.W. Corner Gymkhana, at Polo Ct. (S.W. corner) "H" Hacienda and twenty-fifth Hayward. Avenue Highland Avenue HI" - At Poplar, S.E. Corner - At E. Santa Inez "Highlander" Hillsborough Blvd. Hillsdale Blvd. West - At Campus Drive - At Glendora - At 19th Ave. Fwy. Hillsdale Court, East "Hillsdale Inn" Idaho at Cypress, S.W. Corner 9 33,84, 101 41, 44 40, 80 36 59 108 27 51 115 38 1 66 125 125 5 " " ("I" c ont' d) MAP Isabelle Avenue - At 29th Ave., N.E. Corner - West side 3 50 Jennibelle Ave. - Laurie Meadows - Carol Way 32 Keswick & Railroad Ave. 72 "La Casa Hermosa" Lago at Los Prados La Selva - Casa de Campo - Los Prados La Selva at Norfolk 113 2 39 78 Laurie Me ows Drive - At Carol Way & Jennibell:e 32 - At Pacific Ave. 14 - On North side 54+ - On South, East & North sides 94 Lodato Ave., North side, at end of cul-de-sac 55 Los Prados - And Casa de Campo & La Selva - And Lago 39 2 " " ttw.tt "Ntr MAP Main Street ("Main St._ Garage") between 1st & 3rd 129 Maple Street at Fifth 60 Monterey Street, end 137 Mounds Road 4+7, 61 Mulberry Ct. & Condon Ct. 69 19th Ave. Fury. - At Concar, South Grant & Delaware - At Hillsdale, West - At Norfolk, S.E. corner 9 66 10 Ninth Avenue - At Amphlett Blvd., South 96, 128 - At El Camino Real, N.E. corner 43 Norfolk Avenue - At 19th Ave. Fwy., N.E. corner 53 - At 19th Ave. Fwy., S.E. corner 10 - At La Selva 78 "0" "0akview Apts. " 116 " " MAP tip tt tFRH Pacific Ave., at Laurie Meadows, N.E. corner 14+ Palm Avenue - And El Camino Real - At Tenth, N.W. corner - At Tenth, S.W. corner - At Twenty-first, East side "Palm Court Palos Verdes Court Palos Verdes Drive - North side - #1343 Pico Ave. at 26th (N.W. corner) Polhemus Rd. Polo Ct. at Gymkhana, S.W. corner Poplar Avenue - At Highland Ave., S.E. corner Railroad Avenue - At Birch - At Keswick - 41115 117 17, 18 34+, 35, 98, 112 57 11.2 61 29, 42 122 21 88 36 6 27' 90 72 73 " " ("R" cont'd) MAP "Royal Coach Inn" San Mateo Drive, ;'x42 - 446 33 118 Santa Inez Avenue, East - At Eldoratrlo, N.E. corner 141 - At Highland Avenue 51 Seville Way 77 Shasta at Woodberry, S.W. corner 26 South Boulevard 109 - #151 138 Southwood Avenue at 36th Avenue, N. side 13 "T" Tenth Avenue at Palm - N.W. corner - S.W. corner 17 34, 98, 112 Third Avenue 82, 89 - At Arroyo Court 113 - East of Bayshore, #157-163 135 - #151 119 - At Virginia Avenue, S.E. corner 45 " " ("T" cont'd) MAP Thirty-first Avenue, cul-de-sac 15 Thirty-ninth, East, and Curtiss St. 63 Thirty-sixth Avenue - At -El Camino Real, N.W. corner 65 - At Southwood Avenue 13 Tilton Avenue at Amphlett Blvd. 139 Tulane Road & Tulane Court 56 Turner Terrace 91 Twentieth Avenue West, Extension 85 Twenty-eighth Avenue - At Edison 79, 114 - At Ventura 92 Twenty-fifth Avenue, at Hacienda 59 Twenty-first Avenue at Part, East side of Palm 57 Twenty-ninth Avenue at Isabelle, N.E. corner 3 Twenty-sixth Avenue 126 - At Pico, N.W. corner 21 Ventura, at 28th Avenue 92 Vernon Terrace, at Yew Street 11 " ("V" cont'd) MAP Virginia Avenue at Third Avenue, S.E. corner 45 Woodberry, at Shasta, S.W. corner 26 Thy TI Yew Street - At Ashwood. Court 24 - At Vernon Terrace 11 "York Condominium" 91 icw MAURICE K. HAMILTON CITY ATTORNEY LYLE L. LOPUS ASST. CITY ATTORNEY PETER W. OLSON DF.P CITY ATTORNEY MARY G. HARRIS ADM. SECRETARY C Mr. Gordon Tilison Jones-Tilison & Associates 2575 Flores Street San Mateo, CA 94403 Dear Gordon: /BAR 2? 1978 PUBLIC W IVIA =EO WORKS DEPT. cia-e-44-i_ige:,d cot_ „,-2 • OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 330 WEST TWENTIETH AVENUE SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA 94403 TELEPHONE (415) 574-6720 March 14, 1978 Re: Parcel Map Certification Pursuant to your request of last week, I am enclosing a copy of the City of San Mateo's Resolution No. 154 (1977), authorizing the City Clerk and the Director of Public Works to act and consent to recordation of dedications on parcel. aps. In addition, I am enclosing a copy of Goy:.- Code g22.81, which sets forth the usual form utilized by the City Clerk in accepting a deed or grant on behalf of the Cites. The Resolutof iir autho itylor doing so, even tTiough specific action may not have been taken by the City Council. Generally, she will attach her certificate of acceptance when this office or the Director of Public Works approves the grant. I would suggest for a certification on a parcel map that you execute it as follows: CONSENT AND ACCEPTANCE I, JOAN HINCKLEY, City Clerk of the City of San Mateo, hereby accept the dedications set forth hereon on behalf of the City of San Mateo, pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 154 (1977), adopted by the City Council on August 15, 1977, and con- sent- to recordation thereof. Dated: City Clerk " f Mr. Gordon Tillson -2- March 14, 1978 If you have any question concerning the proposed legend on the parcel map for the acceptance and consent to record by the City Clerk, please advise. MKH:sjs Enclosure cc: City Clerk 'Director of Public Works Sincerely yours, --,Aititt_e_ 97 et'firali t, /MAURICE K. HAMILTON I¢ t 9 RICHARD II. COLEMAN, Director JOHN WATT, Building Official PETER KATZLBERGER, City Planner November 5, 1975 TELEPHONE: BUILDING DIVISION (415) 574.6750 PLANNING DIVISION (415) 5746770 Mr. Edward W. Baca 703 Woodside Road, Suite 7 Redwood City, CA 94061 Subject: Information on Parcel Maps Dear Mr. Baca: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 330 WEST TWENTIETH AVENUE SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, 94403 In response to your letter of November 4, 1975, I am pleased to inform you that the City of San Mateo has a specific procedure in informing the public when a Parcel Map is required. This is done as part of the review of the Board of Zoning Adjustments. After the Board of Zoning Adjustments has considered an item, each applicant receives a written report itemizing all the requirements needed to process that particular development. If a Parcel Map is one of the requirements, it is specifically noted in this written report. Thank you for your interest in this procedure. Sincerely yours, 0 ! c... Richard H. Coleman, Director Department of Community Development RHC:dw CC: Robert G. Bezzant, Director of Public Works Peter Katzlberger, City Planner RECEIVED NOV 6 1975 SAN MATEO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. PUBUr. 3 LEPT. 1 . Residence: 341.6432 • EDWARD W. BACA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR 703 Woodside Road Suite 7 Redwood City, California 94061 3oundory and lot Surveys Construction Surveys City of San Mateo 330 W. 20th Ave. San Mateo, Ca., 94403 Attn: Planning Dept. Dear Mr. Richard Coleman: Officer 365.3333 November 4, 1975 We are constantly being confronted with confused and bewildered clients concerning the filing of "PARCEL MAPS" and their questions narrow down to "WHY, WHEN & HOW?" It appears to me that no one knows the complete answers to these questions, but perhaps we can narrow it down a bit and reduce the confusion to a minimum or at least to a point of tolerant confusion. If the professionals concerned, in any matter whatsoever, with the preparation or association of a PARCEL MAP explains his function this would be of extreme importance. People concerned with this subject are: Civil Engineers & Land Surveyors County & City Engineers County & City Building Departments County & City Planning Departments Title Companies (and to a lessor extent, Realtors) A small prepared statement issued by the County & City Engineer's office and County & City Building Department stating the prerequisites for a building permit and where and how to full -fill these prerequisites would be of extreme value. Title Companies and Realtors should also be able to direct their clients to an informative source which will inform them as to the existing status of the land in question and as to whether or not a Parcel Map is required. Time and time again people come to us, after their building plans are nearly approved and after they've committed themselves to a building construction loan only to find out at the very last minute that a PARCEL MAP has to be filed. -1- t tb Ur DEVELOPMENT PLANING NOV 5 1975 ACTION: " " " This means a delay of at least eight weeks or more and the loss of the loan. The Building Department usually claims that a Parcel Map was mentioned some weeks back, but very few people know what a Parcel Map is, but if the item was emphasized by a notice in his possession chances are he wouldn't have let it slip out of mind. At least he would have questioned the item and more than likely pursued it. Gentlemen, our public needs some help in this matter and I urge you all to give it some thought. Most sincerely, /1/ Edward W. Baca, L.S. EWB : bmc 2/17/69 RESOLUTION NO. ,`' (1969) . SETTING FEE FOR EACH SEPARATE PART OA TAMIL,Or LAND INTO WHICH ORIGINAL "'"" T OR PARCEL IS DIVIDED 1911 ACT BONDS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Mateo, California, that: WHEREAS, Chapter 5 of Part 5, Division 7, (Sections 6480 et seq.) of the Streets and Highways Code provides the procedures for issuing new bonds when there has been a division of land against which there is an outstanding bond issued to represent unpaid assessments pursuant to Chapter 1, of Part 5, Division 7 of said Code; WHEREAS, Section 6481 of said Code provides that, if the fee of five dollars ($5.00), therein provided to be paid to the street superintendent for each lot or parcel of land into which the original lot or parcel is to be divided is, in the opinion of the Council, inadequate, it may, by resolution, fix a fee sufficient to reimburse the city for the necessary administrative costs in processing applications under said Chapter 5; and WHEREAS, the administrative costs to the City of San Mateo incurred by the Office of the Treasurer, Street Superintendent and Attorney in processing applications for divisions of land and bonds are in excess of five dollars •($5.00) for each lot or parcel into which the original lot or parcel is divided. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED and ORDERED that: 1. The administrative costs to the City of San Mateo for processing applications for the division of land and bond pursuant to Chapter 5, Part 5 of Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code are in excess of the five dollars ($5.00) provided by Section 6481 thereof and that a fee sufficient to reimburse the city for said necessary administrative costs is: 1. " " For the first two separate lots or parcels of land into which the original lot or. parcel is tobe divided: $80.00 For each additional lot or parcel $30.00 2. All applications filed with the street superintendent for the division of land and bond pursuant to Chapter 5, Part 5 of Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be accom- panied by an amount equal to the fee established by paragraph 1 hereof which fee shall be deposited in the treasury of this city and used to pay the direct and administrative costs incurred in processing said application. City lerk * *** * Mayor X hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of San Mateo, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of FEBRUARY , 1969, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmen: MURRAY, WEBER, WAYNE and ARCHIBALD NOES, Councilmen: NONE ABSENT, Councilman: GARVEY ��a.��s.cl1' lerk e City of San e City of San Mateo 2. " November 19, 1969 Mr. Robert G. Bezzant City Engineer City of San Mateo San Mateo, California 411 ._,A0rieopnre OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER 11101/2 0 1963 ENGINEERING DEPT. Subject: Survey of Subdivision Requirements for Less Than Five Lots Dear Robert: The Millbrae City Council has asked me to determine what is practiced in our area so far as making requirements of the developer of a subdivision of a parcel of land into four (4) or fewer lots. I have tabulated on the enclosed sheet the normal type of requirements for the usual subdivision in the State of California. Please check off those requirements you impose on the "minor" four -lot subdivision in your city, in the appropriate square. I will supply you with a copy of the survey results when I have the summary compiled. Please respond at your earliest convenience. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Valentine F. Padovan City Engineer/Director of Public Works VFP:ck Enclosure CC: Richard E. Watson, City Administrator Frank Piombo, City Attorney SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS r _ _ Li 4Vie1QU of . Less Than n9 : Lots: San Mateo November 25, 1969 1.a. Parcel Map b. Record. of Survey Map C. Map Calculations d. Land Title Report "' Lyle D. Johnson Assistant City Engineer 2.a.. Dedication Instruments (Street Access, Parks, Etc.) b. Public Utilities Easement Instruments c. Private (or Common) Easements 3.a. Tax Status Certificates (County) b. Tax Status Certificates (City) 4. Preliminary Soils Report 5.a. Improvement Plans (with Utilities) b. Grading Plan -""—' "- c. Improvement Sepcifications d. Cost Estimates e, Calculations (Backing Plans, 6.a. City -Developer Agreement b. (1) Faithful Performance Bond (2) Labor and Materials Bond (3) Monumentation Bond (4) Grading & Excavation Bond c. Insurance Certificates 7.a. Planning Commission Application Fees (For Tentative Map, etc.) b. Map & Plan Checking Fees c, Sewer Fees d. Water Fees e. Grading Permit Fees f.. Inspection Fees S.a. Compliance with Planning Commission Conditions b. Compliance with City Council Conditions 9.a. Construction of Improvements Actually Required of the Developer b. Civil Engineer Supervision of the Plans and Construction 10. All Field Work to be Accepted Before Building Permits are Issued. 11,. '):.he fi (Please List) X X X Whenever documents of dedication or easements are required, we always require execution prior to recordation. X After bonds and all fees are paid, building permits are issued. *Not all requests require the same conditions, therefore the Sometimes answers. Whenever conditions are stipulated, we always require backup data. '42w 9'9 9 OFt=ICF OF RICHARD V HO SAAN CRPCTOF2 OF PLANNING March 17, 1969 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of San Mateo Gentlemen: 330 WEST TWENTIETH AVENUE SAN MATEO. CALIFORNIA 94402• • TELEPHONE: (415) 341-1331 At their meeting of January 13, 1969, the San Mateo City Planninq Commission recommended the adoption of the followin subdivision r'ee schedu�e: Subdivision of less than 5 Lots) *Tentative, Map $25.00 50.00 *These fees are intended to defray the cost of advertising not the cost of processing the -applications. **Final tyllap $50.00 -1- 5 Q0jt.ot C"olf the deposit is not used, the balance will be refunded. If the cost is more, the City will bill the applicant. Commissioner Welch made the motion; seconded by Commissioner Burkdall and carried unanimously (5.0). Very truly yours, Frank A. Barges, Chairman 4 r" Son Mateo_.Ci,t} y Planning Commission • By . V. Hogan; Director of Planning cc: Mr. Arthur B. Sullivan, City Manager Mr. William J. O'Farrell, City Clerk N1AR 1 8 i9B9 70/2/-0 Y 16•/ zit.? ci/ ENGINEERING DEPT. A44 -7//P '/ Api i/ 7 /jCf Eng,°neefing Department Coordination Sheet Engr,.Dept. Originator lnit t J • Ir. Ayle:tt B. Cotton 260 California Street Francisco, California 94111 San De ar 1h.. Cotton: February 8, 1968 Re: Lot 315, San Iateo City Izestead Association Subdivision sank you for your letter of February 2, relative to subdivision of Lot 315 into ?. lots. It is possible to subdivide a larger parcel into tt- or less lots by: (1) (n) (3) Obtaining the permission of the Plannin the Yngineering Donartment. Department and Creating legal parcels or lots (which it alas You are doing in prom/ding for 5,000 square -foot lots in an Rl-C zone). Preparing., aecordinc to the appropriate sections of the State Business & Professions Code, a parcel map for chec]dnc by this office and filing with the County Recorder at which recording the 4 lots 'will assume an individual identity and the larger lot will be erased. (4) Providing any necessary missing str•tets, sewer, storm drain or lighting n facilities up to our subdivision standards level. We have processed quite a number of these parcel maps, and aseuming all goes smoothly, they take less than 30 days. T snh you for your inquiry. Very truly yours, Rt1R:.jc ♦ i cc: .. Stanley Ott, Director of Planning; " " KELSO, COTTON, SELTGMAN & RAY A T TORN Y S A T L A W 2 6 0 C A L I F O R N I A STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 9411f February 2, 1968 Mr. Robert Bezzant City Engineer City Hall 330 W. 20th Avenue San Mateo, California Dear Mr. Bezzant: 14151 397-4600 CABLE ADDRESS KECOE E ffi'.?AFYL' . R" .. FEB 5 1968 ENGINEERING DEPT. I am one of the owners of L t�� 15 of the San Mateo City Homestead Association " if 1 " as filed in 1872. Lot 315 is a rectangle, having a frontage of 200 feet on Borel Avenue and a depth of 100 feet on Shafter Street and Tilia Street. It .contains 20,000 square feet. It is the intention of the other owners and myself to subdivide Lot 315 into four lots, each having a depth of 100 feet and a frontage of 50 feet. Each lot will be a rectangle containing 5000 square feet. The division lines will be such that the two most southerly lots will each front 100 feet on Borel Avenue and 50 feet on the other streets (Shafter and Tilia), while the two northerly lots will each have a frontage of 50 feet, one fronting on Tilia and the other on Shafter. I would appreciate your writing me as to the requirements for such a subdivision. Veryy/tru ��,�� fyS�� rs, ett B. Cotton ABC:jk FORM PC -11 206112-64 To Mr. Ott RE: INTER -OFFICE COMMUNICATION CITY OF SAN MATEO ta4" Requirements for Subdivision Maps DATE January 9, 1968 FROM Lee Bowman Could you ask the Engineering Department that in the future land areas of all parcels and streets in any subdivision or parcel map be calculated as a condition of approval. Since the bearings are checked by computer, the calculations do not add an undue burden to the map check. The calculations are of unestimable value in maintaining and updating the land use files. C 0 P•Y OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Room 500, Wells Fargo Bank Building Fifth Street and Capitol Mall, Sacramento 95814 December 1, 1966 Louis Heinzer Chief Counsel Department of General Services 1108 "0" Street Sacramento, California Dear Mr. Heinzer: This.letter is in reply to your memorandum of November 1, 1966, in which you requested our opinion on the proper construction to be given to the parcel map provisions of the Subdivisiorl,Map Act which were added in 1965. Questions one, two and three of your memorandum request our opinion as to whether in certain fact situations set forth in Business and Professions Code section 11535, the parcel map provisions contained in sections 11575 through 11580 of the Business and Professions Code (all section references are to the Business and Professions Code) must be complied with. We are of the opinion that the parcel map requirements contained in sections 11575 through 11580 are mandatory in all cases falling within section 11535 subdivision (c). However, where a division of land falls within section 11535 subdivision (b), in the absence of any local. ordinance regulating the division of land, we do not feel that the parcel map provisions need be complied with. . It is apparent from the report of the Sub -Committee on Governmental Efficiency and Economy (Assembly Interim Committee Report 1963 through 1965, Vol 8, No. 9) that the parcel map requirements of section 11575 through 11580 were created and were intended to be used in lieu of the record of survey map which had theretofore been authorized as an alternative to the "subdivision" map. Subdivision (c) of section 11535 prior to its amendment provided that when land was divided in such a manner that it fell within the exemptions contained in then subdivision (b), the filing of a tentative map and a record of surveying map were required. The substance of the provisions of subdivision (b) of section 11535 prior to its amendment are contained in amended section 11535 subdivision (c). We must conclude therefore that insofar as divisions of property fall within the provisions of section 11535 subdivision (c) both a tentative map and a parcel map must be filed prior to the sale, lease Mr, Louis Heinzer COPY -2- December 1, 1966 or financing of those parcels regardless of the existence of a local ordinance regulating the division. Subdivision (b) of section 11535 as amended, however, provides that a "subdivision does not include any parcel or parcels of land which is divided into four or less parcels." This exemption was, prior to 1965, implied by section 11535 subdivision (a) which provided in brief that a subdivision constitutes a division of land by a subdivider into five or more parcels. Prior to the 1965 amendments, a person dividing land into four or less parcels was not required either to file a tentative map or a record of survey map. The 1965 amendment, adding section 11535 subdivision (d), however, provides that where a local ordinance regulates the division of property in cases falling within subdivision (b), a tentative map must be submitted to the governing body. While the statute is not clear, we are of the opinion that a parcel map must be filed in cases falling within section 11535 subdivision (b) whenever a tentative map is also required to be filed. To hold other- wise would make the requirement of a tentative map useless. The govern- ing body's approval of a tentative map does not authorize the sale, lease or financing of land covered thereby. Approval of the tentative map merely authorizes the filing of a parcel map. The statute provides that the parcel map must be filed and must comply with the provisions of sections 11575 through 11580 before sale, lease or financing may take place. In this connection we would emphasize that in cases requiring the filing of a tentative map either as a result of local ordinance, or because the division contemplated comes within the provisions of section 11535 subdivision (c), a parcel map must be filed.and must comply with the provisions of sections 11575 through 11580. We are of the opinion that the parcel map provisions contained in sections 11575 through 11580 set the minimum standards with which the party making the division must comply. A local governing body or advisory agency may increase the requirements contained in those sections insofar as authorized by section 11540.1, but may not eliminate or in any way weaken those requirements. Questions four and five in your letter concern the discretion which a recorder has in recording a parcel map. Specifically, question four asks us to consider whether a recorder can be bound by a pro- hibition contained in a local ordinance which prohibits the recording of a parcel map that does not comply with that ordinance even though it satisfies the requirements of sections 11575 through 11580. We are of the opinion that the recorder would be bound by such a prohibition contained in a local ordinance. Section 11575 provides as follows: "A parcel map underthe provisions of this chapter shall comply -with all the provisions of the chapter and, if there is a local ordinance, with all its provisions." COPY Mr. Louis Heinzer -3- December 1., 1966 In addition, section 11579 requires that a surveyor must certify that all local ordinances have been complied with before the recorder may file the map. (Insofar as a local ordinance adopts regulations that are more restrictive than the requirements for a subdivision, however, the recorder would clearly not be bound by the requirements as such requirements exceed the limitations imposed upon the local governing body by section 11540.1.) It is apparent, therefore, that a parcel map must comply with local ordinances before it may be filed. Your last question asks for our opinion as to whether the recorder is required to make an independent determination that local ordinances have been complied with or whether he must accept the county surveyors certificate to that effect. Section 11576 requires that a parcel map be submitted to the county surveyor for examination. The map may not be filed by the county recorder until the county surveyor (or city engineer) has signed a certificate containing the following language: "This map has been examined this day of ,19 •,. for conformance with the requirements of Section 11575 of the Subdivision Map -Act. Signed County Surveyor/City Engineer" One of the requirements of section 11575, of course, is that all local ordinances have been complied with. Prior to 1965, section 11626 provided as follows: "Except as provided in Section 11537, no. final map of a sub- division shall be accepted by the county recorder for record unless there has been compliance with all provisions of this chapter and of any local ordinance. "The recorder may have not more than 10 days to examine the final map before accepting or refusing it for recordation." In 1965 the Sub -Committee on Subdivision Mapping recommended to the Legislature that section. 11626 be repealed. It reasoned as follows: "Section 11626 of the Business and Professions Code contains a provision that the county recorder may not accept a final subdivision map until there has been compliance with all provisions.of the Subdivision Map Act. This conflicts with other provisions which assign to the county surveyor or the city engineer the responsibility of determining the map's compliance with the law. The provision in Section 11626 should therefore be removed. "Another provision in Section 11626 allows the recorder 10 days to accept or -refuse a final subdivision map. This provision should be preserved. Accordingly it is proposed that this provision be added in Section 11628 and the entire Section 11626 be repealed." C 0 F Y • Mr. Louis Heinzer J. December 1, 1966 We think it certain that the Legislature, by repealing that section intended to delegate to the county surveyor the duty of determining whether or not the Subdivision Map Act had been complied with. Since the county surveyor is given the same responsibility insofar as parcel maps are concerned, we are of the opinion that the recorder is bound by the county surveyor's certificate of compliance with the provisions of section 11575 and may not make an independent determination in this regard. Our position in this matter is further strengthened by the language of the recorder's -certificate as contained in section 11579. While the certificate of the surveyor preparing the parcel map (section 11579) and the county surveyor's certificate (section 11576 subdivision (d)) must both contain a representation that local ordinances have been complied with, no such representation need be made by the county recorder. It would appear that the county recorder must file a parcel map if it has the certificates required by sections 11576 and 11579 attached to it. We trust the foregoing observations and comments will be of assistance to you at this time and we shall be pleased to consider further problems as they arise. Very truly yours, THOMAS C. LYNCH Attorney General /s/ BURTON J. STANLEY Deputy Attorney General BJS:sp FORM PC -12.20M I 63 • INTER - OFFICE COMMUNICATION CITY OF SAN MATEO September 13, 1963 DATE To John Gard, Engineering Department FROM Richard G. Randolph SUBJECT Subdividing property into less than 5 lots Section li535 (a) of the B. & P. Code (Subdivision Map Act) makes the provisions of the act applicable to "any real property . . . which is divided . . by any subdivider into five or more parcels within any one-year period . . H. The affect of this section is to preclude circumvention of the act by successive less -than -five sub- divisions within a one-year period. There is no prohibition on subdividing under the act several times within one year nor is there a prohibition on subdividing _oroperty excluded from the conditions of the map act several times within one year except that the exclusion ends when the parcel is divided into five or more parcels within any one-year period. I feel that the basic property is not being divided into five or more lots within one year which would make the map act applicable, and you should feel free to accept the maps. Let us reserve for later consideration the problem of one parcel being divided into 5 or more lots within one year but by two subdividers. RGR:eaw SAUL: � 1... i•UR:i This is to certify that satisfactory provisions have been made by the subdivider of Tentative Tract No. with the N me of Utility Cot any as to the location of facilities, and that easements, where required, have been provided for and will be show; oil the fitlal map with the designation " aSeiaonts for i'ublic Utilities". Scare ct PARCEL MA IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY Of THE COUNTY �r ;.N� r - • , ' OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CAL IFORN/A BEJA/G .4 NI/15/0N Of LOT 7 OF TRACT Na 2736- AS RECORDED IN BOOK 202, PAGE S OF MAPS, RECORDS OF t. OS ANGELES COUNT Y. STREET . 4 yr r i Vi M11IF"' 5 N° / SUB S EC TION //535 (8) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT STATE5: "SUBDIVISION DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PARCEL_ OR PARCELS OF LAND WHICH 15 DIVIDED INTO FOUR OR LESS PARCELS." WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AND A LOCAL REGULATING ORDINANCE 15 IN EFFECT THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: I. TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR ADVISORY AGENCY 2, F/LING OF PARCEL MAP THE PARCEL , MAP MAY BE COMPI L E D FROM RECORD DATA WHEN SUFFICIENT SURVEY INFORMATION EXISTS AND WHEN LOCATION OF ANY BOUNDARY OF THE MAP /S CERTAIN. IN THE EVENT THE BOUNDARY OF THE MAP IS UN(ERTA:N DUE TO LACK OF Ex/s/, MONUMENTS OR Pass ESSG�s A FIELD SURVEY SHALL BE MADE. THE COUNTY ENGINEER OR CITY ENGINEER SHALL EXAMINE THE MAP FOR THE INFORMATION SHOWN THEREON, AND /F HE /S SAT'SFIED THAT /TIS TECHNICALLY CORRECT, HE SHALL PLACE HIS CERTAE/CA TE ON THE MAP THE GOVERNIM6 BODY MAY REQUIRE DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC OR PRIVATE. STREETS_ H/GHI�YAYS, V114YS; a(1) EASEMENTS .4S ARE NECESSARY FOR LOCAL TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE, AND SANITARY NEEDS DEDICATIONS SHALL BE MADE 8Y SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PR/OR TO FILING OF THE PARCEL MAP. i OFF1,_]E OF THE ATTORNEY c;:, :r.RAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Room 500, Wells Fargo Bank Building Fifth Street and Capitol Mall, Sacramento -95814 December 1, 1966 Louis Heinzer Chief Counsel Department of General Services 1108 "0" Street Sacramento, California Dear Mr. Heinzer: This letter is in reply -to your memorandum of November 1, 1966, in which you requested our opinion on the proper construction to be given to the parcel map provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which were added in 1965. Questions one, two and three of your memorandum request our opinion as to whether in certain fact situations set forth in Business and Professions Code section 11535, the parcel map provisions contained in sections 11575 through 11580 of the Business and Professions Code (all section references are to the Business and Professions Code) must be complied with. We are of the opinion that the parcel map requirements contained in .sections 11575 through 11580 are mandatory in all cases falling within section 11535 subdivision (c). However, where a division of land falls within -section 11535 subdivision (b), in the absence of any local ordinance regulating the division of land, we do not feel that the parcel map provisions need be complied with. It is apparent from the report of the Sub -Committee on Governmental Efficiency and Economy (Assembly Interim Committee Report 1963 through 1965, Vol 8, No. 9) that the parcel map requirements of section 11575 through 11580 were created and were intended to he used in lieu of the record of survey map which had theretofore been authorized as an alternative to the "subdivision" map. Subdivision (c) of section 11535 prior to its amendment provided that when land was divided in such a manner that it fell within the exemptions contained in then subdivision (b), the filing of a tentative map and a record of surveying map were required. The substance.of the provisions of subdivision (b) of section 11535 prior to its amendment are contained in amended section 11535 subdivision (c). We must conclude therefore that insofar as divisions of property fall within the provisions of section 11535 subdivision (c) both a tentative map and a parcel map must be filed prior to the sa e, ease CeF Mr. Louis Heinzer ':hecember 1, 1966 or financing of t 3use parcels regar le ,f t` exi3tt nce 01 a local ordinance regulating tt:e dLvi::ion. ��.boiv;sian (h) section 115'3 as amended, however, provides that a ":iubdivision does not include any parcel or parcels of .land which is divieed into four or less parcels." Thi's exemption was, prior to 1965, implie(1 by section 11535 subdivision (a) which provided in brief that a subdivision constitutes a division of land by a subdivider into five or more parcels. Prior to the 1965 amendments, a person dividing land into :our or less parcels was not required either to file a tentative map or a record of survey map. The 1965 amendment, adding section },113 „_ sA41v tion (d) , however, /ray= that where_ iiocai or and ance re ul,ate . h .divas _ o7.prop L'S,K._. A... • fallt within subdivision b , a tentative map,.. mul,t .be s, ►mi t . .-L4.t' While the statute is not clear, we are of the opinion that a parcel map must be filed in cases falling within section 11535 subdivision (b) whenever a tentative map is also required to be filed. To hold other- wise would make the requirement of a tentative map useless. The govern- ing body's approval of a tentative map does not authorize the sale, lease or financing of land covered thereby. Approval of the tentative map merely authorizes the filing of a parcel map. Th,e .stalot uoviges that Lhe ,yea;ctj map must be filed and .must congly. with :the r ions ! of sections 1157 617511:1137:07514e. sale. 1 * to qr fiaAPAIDS,BAI take place. In this connection we would emphasize that in cases requiring the filing of a tentative map either as a result of local ordinance, or because the division contemplated comes within the provisions of section 11535 subdivision (c), a parcel map must be filed and must comply with the provisions of sections 11575 through 11580. .Ws l;c of the op tIlign at the parcel may _provisions contained in sections 11575 through.;115e0 _PM Lhe.-ari.4 lint standards with iihick aiW— arty, m kl the division must cam. A los:al- 8 ernit� body or A I.I age,nc ..ty increase the re irements co ned 1„n �.,,gu , j insofar as euk-horrzT y qu~_sec.-.....n - 1l54G..l,ybut may not el urinate_ in any way_weakenthose requirements. Questions four and five in your letter concern the discretion which a recorder has in recording a parcel map. Specifically, question four asks us to consider whether a recorder -can be bound by a pro- hibition contained in a local ordinance which prohibits the recording of a parcel map that does not comply with that ordinance even though it satisfies the requirements of sections 11575 through 11580. We are of the opinion that the recorder would be bound by such a prohibition contained in a local ordinance. Section 11575 provides as follows: "A parcel map under the provisions of this chapter shall comply with 11717.01g. _ � doter aq re issa local ordinancg. Wit,h.._aL. ?.'-s .2.TOYl.&lorfa.' Mr. Louis Heiner tlecember 1, 1966 r .t 1 nn .S.ti.,C.'�.Q11 Z�_. e -� 1 L. Ltui►- _3.._.511.x:'. c I must certify that Y tl $aFS r 1 al x-�Ca! ord•inances....�i 1'x_ besr_.:.LU'u�..��,�:�d,. i.�C;1 'wto ` t_,e recorder may (Insofar as a local ordinance adopts regulations that are more restrictive than the requirements for a subdivision, however, the recorder would clearly not be hound by the' requirements as such requirements exceed the limitations imposed upon the local governing body by section 11540.1.) It is apparent_._ theerefore,_that a parcel maw must comply with local ordinances before lit may be fiiet� Your last question asks for our opinion as to whether the recorder is required to make an independent determination that local ordinances have been complied with or whet'-n.r he must accept the coun*y surveyors certificate to that effect. Sec:tiurc 11576 requir:•s that a parcel snap be submitted to the county surveyor for examination. The map may not be filed by the county recorder until the county surveyor (or city engineer) has signed a certificate containing the following language: "This map has been examf n< .; this day of ,19 , for conformance with the r,. quirem€nts of Section 11575 of the Subdivision Map Act. Signed t:<».;nty Surveyor;City Engineer" One of the resuirements of section I 1j21,, 9f course, s hat-a►l_ �„. er al ordinances have —been complied with �. Prior to 1965, section 11626 provided as follows: "Except as provided in S'7,_tion 11537, no final map of a sub- division shall be accepted by the county recorder for record unless there has been compliance with all provisions of this chapter and of any local ordinance'. "The recorder may have not more than 10 days to examine the final map before accepting or refusing it for recordation." In 1965 the Sub -Committee on Subdivision Mapping recommended to the Legislature that section 11626 be repealed. If reasoned as follows. "Section 11626 of the Business and Professions code contains a provision chat the count:' recorder may not accepr a final subdivision map until there. "'a;, beer compliance with alt provisions of :he Subdivision *tali Act, "1hi:3 <,onilie rs wlth other provisions which -.ss:i,.*r cc the c-c.ti cN .urvt'yc•r or the city "' : ! ' � of detetrnin.n�; t`ic map's ��nhi.;��e�r the re�,�,�,�: � • compliance wit.`' the law. -,r:vision in should th.c r fnre be 1 e.7,0v, I ., .: 1 1,,.,,r s r.h,,!! r e c o r u ,: r ""Another pr��4'i,;i. �. .� .. 10 days to inc.', >1 h rvi , i ',:. ^di... This prow ;s lon s.t;... , c' r ur li ug l y is proposed that this provision be a .i, in Section 116i.-) and the entire Mr. L011is nxt>rti� 1, 1966 We think. it " 1't:; i rPnes1.i :'tip ' section intended to del t,hte tc -he cho tv ,iv . ,lt tne du!, oi f?rmil"ling whether or not the Snb()4vi,,ton Map A. „�_ ? been :o v with. Since the county surveyot 14 given the sirs. iiu.otst as parcel maps are concerned. we Are of the cei, ; . a t n t? Ott the is hound by the county surveyor's c�rt l ficat e ':u,, l +;;nce with . nvielona of section 11575 and may not mane an indn; . c':'.e r•t. deterwtt ion in this regard. Our position in this matter ; 3 f';rther strer t'ned by the language of the recorder's certifit•acr 'A4 contained in snc:ttot' 11579. While the certificate of the surveyni -,reparing the parcel map (section 11579) and the county surveyor's certiflcate (section 11576 subdivision (d)) must.both contain a representation that local ordinances have been complied with, no such representaitur' need be made by the county recorder. It would appear that the county recorder must file a parcel map if it has the certificates required by sections 11576 and 11579 attached to it. We trust the foregoing observations A -rd _omrnenta will be of assistance to you at this time and we shall „ r: te,rsed to consider further problems as they arise. Vary truly yours, THOMAS C. LYNCH Attorney General BURTON J. STANLEY .tputy Attorney General BJS,ap FORM PC -II 27M II.6( t To IN'II'IEAIFIFICIE COMMUNIMATION CITY OF SAN MATED Stanley J . Ott, Director of Planning Richard G. Randolph, City Attorney DATF October 18, 1965 FROM Robert G. Bezzant, City Engineer suBJEcr Background of "Parcel Maps" Addition to Subdivision Sections of State Codes For your information and return. RGB:Ig Attach. e:ash Y9 � is i626, fipar 1...M" r 2 3 1955 ROBERT G BEZZANT O C T 18 1965 e -re t. V&A) t 0 ; L / 00 ere /IV a S f THE STATE MAP ACT-- ENGINEERING ASPECTS by John A. Lambie County Engineer County of Los Angeles SUBDIVISION PROCESSING IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY The impact of new subdivisions is a theme frequently presented by journalists writing on the current problems affecting southern California. The presentation as such is usually along the standard lines wherein the transition from agricultural areas to intensely urban and suburban areas is effected. Since we are all aware of these items I shall not attempt to reiterate this popular presentation, but rather to show how a County Engineer or County Surveyor must act. In particular, the examples referred to here are those in Los Angeles County. According to the Subdivision Map Act, an examination must be made by the County Engineer of all subdivision maps within his jurisdiction to see that they are technically correct. The law itself is not too explicit as to what this means, but by usage and development of checking procedures, Los Angeles County has taken this to be the following: (1) A systematic and thorough check of the physical location of the tract as implied by the survey information provided on the final map. This is checking for conformity with survey records, ties to the highway pattern already existing, and its relationship to highway alignments defined by the Master Plan of Highways. (2) Any and all changes in title as shown by a preliminary title report furnished by a title company. At the time of submission of the map for checking, the survey data is reviewed with the same degree of detail and precise surveying scrutiny as would be done on any record of survey, both as to accuracy of mathematical information and as to validity of establishment. (3) Procedurely, this submitted final map must also satisfy the physical requirements of any and all jurisdictions having an interest in this new map, such as problems of sanitation, water supply, design of roads, storm drains 1 and other appurtenances to the subdivision. The procedure also entails checking with the County Assessor and Tax Collector to see that all conditions affecting tax liens upon the property have been legally dealt with. In addition, checking must be performed to see that the specific design and layout of the subdivision meets the approval of all planning groups concerned so as to afford the best treatment for the land use of the particular land involved. Before the final map and improvement plans can be processed in the manner I have just outlined, the tentative subdivision map must be approved. In Los Angeles County the Regional Planning Commission acts as the central agency in processing the tentative map. Copies of the tentative map are distributed by the Planning Commission staff to all interested. departments. After the various departments have reviewed the map both in the office and in the field if necessary, representatives of these departments meet with the engineer and subdivider to discuss all matters relative to the map. The volume of tract maps is such that a weekly meeting is held by members of the various County departments who comprise the Subdivision Committee. The Committee is composed of repre- sentatives of the Regional Planning Commission, County Engineer, Road Department, Health Department, Parks and Recreation, Forester and Fire Warden and the Flood Control District. They report their recommendations directly to the subdivider and his engineer. Representatives of other affected public agencies such as the Division of Highways and school districts are invited to attend the meetings. If agreement is reached between the Committee and the subdivider as to various conditions to be met, the Committee then presents their recommendations to the Planning Commission for approval. If a problem presents itself during the meeting and there is a need for future study on the part of any department or the subdivider, a time extension is requested by the subdivider and the tentative map is considered at a future meeting. Upon approval by the Planning Commission the subdivider receives a copy of the conditions of approval for the tentative map; then, he is in a position to give the green light to his engineer to prepare a final map and necessary improvement plans. Due to all of these above mentioned items, a staff is required which is capable of performing the surveying and design functions involved in the checking. This intensity of attention to their final map might receive objections from subdividers if it were not for the fact that most of them recognize that it is only 2 " " through detailed checking such as we have mentioned that they are assured of having the correct and excellent product that they are trying to market. In recent years, because of the rapid disappearance of flat lands, more and more subdivision activity hastaken to the hills and mountainous areas of the County. Modern engineering techniques can cope with the problems raised by these hillside developments, but only upon acceptance of somewhat expensive solutions. I shall briefly discuss some of these problems; in particular, those which are implied by the need for systematic, professional geological examinations, by the extensive drainage and sewerage systems that sometimes must be installed, and by those that are involved in the heavy duty grading that is almost always present for such projects. Approximately 42 per cent of all subdivision lots recorded in Los Angeles County during the past year were in the hillside -- foothill --mountain category. We estimate that between 25 and 30 per cent of all subdivision lots required geological study. There is no doubt in my mind that these percentages will grow larger and development costs will spiral upward as subdividers utilize more and more of the "close -in" hillside areas. Geological considerations in many instances affect street alignments and gradients and the orientation of slope faces. It is important for the engineer who prepares tentative maps for hillside properties to consult an engineering geologist in order to lay out the tract in a manner most advantageous in as far as geology is concerned. Only a few short years ago we couldn't deny a building permit to anyone even if we knew of a potential or existing geological or flood hazard. In fact it was even impossible to get a statement from the contractor or owner acknowledging that such a hazard existed. Although the Map Act does not offer specific verbiage in dealing with these hazards, we have of necessity, had to accept our responsibilities in these matters. At the present time, we have the tools to insure that every structure is constructed on a safe site free of these hazards. As an example which illustrates our responsibility in protecting building sites and the home buyer, we have had increased activity during the last few years in the Saugus-Solemint Junction area on the north side of the Santa Clara River. Several subdivisions have been recorded on a high bluff over- looking the valley floor. In addition to the normal setback at the rear of the houses backing up to the bluff, an area was designated on the final map as a restricted use area. As an 3 " additional feature, we required that a fence be placed in such a location as to isolate the useable portions of the lot from the potentially hazardous portions which were located along the edge of the bluff. The consulting engineering geologist in this case, as in all instances, recommended that these areas be designated as such. No building permits can be issued within the restricted use area without the applicant providing adequate protective devices; if necessary, to make the structure safe. Development in some areas has preceded available trunk sewer outlets. Many subdivisions have been required to provide sewage pumping and treatment facilities in addition to trunk line sewers. In some cases, areas within or adjacent to the subdivision have been provided for the disposal of effluent. bHrsr��,f t We have a prime example of this in the Topanga Canyon area. The first subdivider in a particular area constructed a treatment/ plant such that it could be expanded to accept sewage from adjacent properties which were naturally contributary to the plant. The adjacent subdividers who would use the facility entered into agreements with the initial subdivider so that the single facility was of benefit to all the developers as well as the County. Only one spray area was needed to serve all parties.; ��-a Drainage and debris problems are more acute and plentiful in -- the hillsides; consequently, in these area torm drain_ improvements are becoming the rule rather than the exception. In conjunction with increased drainage facilities, there is a need for simplifying and extending the present laws related to reimbursement and fees for drainage improvements which benefit properties other that the particular subdivision or development. The move into the foothills and mountains has certainly increased the cost of subdividing and also has resulted in local jurisdictions adopting ordinances and policies in order to protect the public interest. PROPOSED ENGINEERING AND IMPROVEMENT LEGISLATION The complexities of land development today have resulted in increased engineering and improvementproblems, yet, the existing Map Act is written in such a general manner as to permit local jurisdictions flexibility in adopting local ordinances to provide solutions. " On the subject of reimbursement and fees for drainage improvements, Los Angeles County is going to sponsor amendments to Sections 11543 and 11543.5 of the Map Act during the current session of of the Legislature. There are problems inherent in the current law which make it difficult to use in many instances. It provides reimbursement programs for subdivisions only and does not permit reimbursement for large, singular properties such as shopping centers, industrial plants and similar developments that are surrounded by new subdivisions. These properties have the same problem as adjacent subdivision developments and should be treated in a like manner when improvements are installed. We believe these amendments will make the use of Sections 11543 and 11543.5 fair to all developers and subdividers, and also make it practical for local jurisdictions to administer. CONTROL OF LOT SPLITS Another topic which in recent years has raised its head is that of the control of divisions of land which are not subdivisions by means of some controlling process for lot splits through changes in the Subdivision Map Act which would introduce new parcel map laws. Many substandard developments exist throughout the State partially because there is no State law regulating division of land into four or less parcels, commonly referred to as "lot splits"; consequently, there are almost as many different ways of regulating and mapping such developments as there are local jurisdictions. There are several different methods used in processing lot splits as evidenced by the great variety of ordinances promulgated by the many cities of Los Angeles County. Several types of maps can be prepared depending upon the jurisdiction: (1) A plot plan can be prepared on a sheet of butcher paper, tissue paper, or any piece of paper that is handy. The plan can be prepared by anyone, whether he can draw a straight line or not. (2) A map of record wi .h may or may not be prepared by a Registered Engineer or a Licensed Land Surveyor, and may or may not be recorded. (3) A record of survey fah, of course, must be prepared by a Registered Engineer or a Licensed Land Surveyor and must be filed with the County Recorder. 5 " (4) A final map which is the same as a subdivision map is required by some cities in which division of land into two or more parcels constitutes a subdivision. In those cities that have lot split regulations, a wide variety of improvements are required. Some cities require bonding for the improvements and others do not. The. type of map and extent of the improvements should be standardized such that they are not excessive in one community and almost nil in another. I believe that most of you will agree that there is need to obtain necessary dedications and improvements in "lot split" developments. It is anticipated that several major amendments relating to divisions of land which are not subdivisions will be intro- duced at this session of the Legislature by the Assembly Interim Committee on Governmental Efficiency and Economy. Proposed amendments to Section 11535b and several other sections of the Subdivision Map Act would better define divisionsof land which are not subdivisions and also provide uniformity in the regulation and mapping of "lot splits" throughout the State. The basic substance of existing Subsections 11535(b -l), (b-2) and (b-3) defining what is not a subdivision has been retained in the proposed amendments. Amendments relating to divisions of land which create four or less parcels and that which creates parcels of a gross area of forty (40) acres or more have been added. IThe amendments provide for a thir p, as distinguished from the subdivision and recor o survey map, called a parcel map; it would be used for practically all divisions of land which are not subdivisions. At the present time Subsection of the Subdivision Map Act provides for filing of a record of survey map for divisions of land which are not defined as subdivisions. Section 87V of the Land Surveyor's Act defines the proper use of the record of survey map, which purpose is primarily not the division of land. 100Chese illustrations show different examples of divisions of land which are not subdivisions. Detailed explanations of their use is outlined in the marginal area. We believe that the creation of the parcel map will provide guiding legislation from which local jurisdictions can prepare implementing ordinances. There will be a well-defined line of distinction in the use of the subdivision, record of survey and parcel map. This distinction does not exist at the present time. 6 " " In conclusion,I would like to briefly summarize the processes involved in getting a subdivision map to record in Los Angeles County. Our Mapping Division acts as a clearing house for all other divisions and departments which must clear the subdivision map for approval. This approval is based on feasible improvement plans which must be accompanied by necessary agreements and faithful performance and labor and materials bonds. The County Engineer then prepares a letter to the Board of Supervisors recommending that the map be approved and that all offers of dedications and easements be accepted and that all agreements and bonds be approved and accepted. After the Board of Supervisors takes the aforementioned action, the County Engineer presents the map to the County Recorder for recording. The subdivider is then ready to build homes. During the fiscal year 63-64 there were recorded in Los Angeles County 815 subdivisions having a total of 21,000 lots. There has been a steady increase in these figures for the last several years. While the procedures which we are using in Los Angeles County are working very satisfactorily, the proposed drainage reimbursement and parcel map legislation will expand our capabilities for serving all developers and the public in a more consistent manner. 7 SCALE r= GO` SHEET/OF/SHEET 16341: t a r --11r- /25 PARCEL MAP N'1 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OFTHE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A D/1//S/ON OF LOT 7 OF TRACT NO. 2730 AS RECORDED /N ROOK 202, PAGE 5 OF MAPS. RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY This map was prepared by me or under my direction and was compiled from record data in conformance with the requirements of /he Subdivision /Clap Act a/ /he request of John Doe on April /, /964. /hereby certify /hat if conforms to the approved tentative rnaro and the conditions of 4pprovo/ thereof; that a//provisions of copdicab/e Slate law and /ow/ordinances have been complied with L.5 a, RCE filed far record this 2 "d day of May, /964 at 7.PM in Book I of Parcel Maps a/ Page / at the request of John Doe. County Recorder A N N STREET 0 �NWCaoflot 7: fd. or/y/no/ Tr. Mon Variable width easement to the County of Los Angeles for road purpose per OR D-/84/-200 5W Cui of Jot 7, Id original /Tr..Mon. /25 W 2s N.E.Cor.of lot 7, Td ong. Cr Mon N S.E. Car. of lot 7, orig. )7, -Tr Mon. Fd ik_i �_�' s r s] Arc r . - & 1 t •tom ' S t ' Vs PROPOSED SUBSECTION 1/535 (BJ OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT STATES: "SUBDIVISION DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND WHICH IS DIVIDED INTO FOUR OR LESS PARCELS." WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AND A LOCAL REGULATING ORDINANCE IS IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: I. TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL BY THE COVEROG BODY OR ADVISORY AGENCY 2. FILING OF PARCEL MAP THE PARCEL MAP MAY BE COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA WHEN SUFFICIENT SURVEY INFORMATION EXISTS AND WHEN LOCATION OF ANY BOUNDARY OF THE MAP /S CERTAIN. IN THE EVENT THE BOUNDARY OF THE MAP IS UNCERTAIN, DUE TO LACK OF EXISTING MONUMENTS OR POSSESSORY LINE. A FIELD SURVEY SHALL BE MADE. IN TH£ CASE WHERE A FIELD SURVEY IS MADE, THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OR CITY ENG/NEER SHALL EXAMINE THE MAP RN THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN THEREON., AND IF !/E IS SAT/SF/ED THAT IT /S TECHNICALLY CO T, HE SHALL PLACE HIS CERTIFICATE ON THE MAP. THE GOVERNING- BODY MAY REWIRE DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREETS, HIGHWAYS, W4YS, OR EASEMENTS AS ARE NECESSARY FOR LOCAL TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE, AND SANITARY NEEDS. DEDICATIONS SHALL BE MADE BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PR/OR TO FILING OF THE PARCEL MAP. 250 SCALE: /= so• SWEET / of / SHEET PARCEL 4(4° 4(9 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BE/NG .4 SUED/t//SIGN OF LOT 5 OF Ti?ACT Ng ClII 1S R CORDED /N 8v0/i 70/, :WE 4 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGEL 05 COUNTY • This mop dmos prepared By me or under my direction and /s based upon/ a fit -4d survey in conformance with /he rejuirements of the Subdivision Map Ac/ at the revues/ of John Doe on April / /364. / hereby certify Motif conforms to the approved /ento/ive mop and the condi/ions of opprovo/ thereof; Ma/ a// prov/sions of z of e Stole /ow and loco/ ordmonces hove been comp/led with L.5. or R.C.E.— 60 30 � 30 cc zQ 6 30 0 30 Filed for record /his 26:9 day of May, /964 of 7P. M. /r/ boo/(/ of Farce/ Mops at Poye 2 at the revues/ of John Doe, County Recorder Th/S /nap has been examined this Z ° day of May, /964; for conformance with the revuire/vents of Sect/on //57/ of the Subdivision Mop Act. Coonty Surveyor/City Engineer 6 200 /00 3 /00 /00 6 /00 I /00 /000 9 /00 _ 30 5 /0 �?7 Z00 s 0 30 60 30 30 PROPOSED SU8SECT/ON /1535 CO OF THE SUBDI— VISION MAP ACT STATES THAT A SUBDIVISION DOES NOT INCLUDE A DIVISION OF ANY REAL PROPERTY IN WHICH: "THE W//OLE PARCEL BEFORE DIVISION CONTAINS LESS THAN FIVE ACRES; EACH PARCEL CREATED BY THE DIVISION ABUTS UPON A PUBLIC STREET OR H/6HWAY; NO DEDICATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE REWIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY." WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AND A LOCAL REGULATING ORDINANCE IS IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING /S ,9EOU/RED: /. A FIELD SURVEY WHEN FIVE OR MORE PARCELS ARE CREATED. 2 TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR .9DV/SORY AGENCY. 3 FILING OF PARCEL MAP. IN THE CASE WHERE A FIELD SURVEY 1S MADE, THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OR CITY ENGINEER SHALL EXAMINE THE MAP FOR THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN THEREON, AND IF HENS SAT/SF/ED THAT IT /S TECHNICALLY CORRECT, HE SHALL PLACE HIS CERTIFICATE ON THE MAP. SCALE 1 = 600 SHEET 10F I SHEET PARCEL MAP N° .3 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY Of LOS ANGELES BEING A DIVISION OF THE NW y 0P SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST S.B.M. This mop was prepared by me or under my direction and is based upon a field survey in conformance with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act at the request of John Doe on April /964. I hereby certify that if conforms to the op - proved tentative mop and the conditions of approval thereof; that all provisions of applicable stole /ow and /ocol ordi- . ponces hove been complied with. L.S. e- R.C.E. 2640 Filed for record this 2nd day of May, 1964 at 700 PM. in Book. /of Parcel Maps at Page 3, at the relive,' of Tohn Doe. Covn4 Recorder This map hos been examined this 2ad day of May, 1964, for conformance with the requirements of Section 11571 of the Subdivision Map Act. County Survey-/Ciyfnyineer 1 0 1310 ii! t 2^ A /3/0 /0 w 2 2 Ac. 10 road easement if the County of Los Angeles per OR 0-1552 4 1310 J1! ice--, r b /C Ac. 3 1310 4 20 Ac. 13/0 O 10 III /320 /320 6 .: ' A: . 1320 20 easement for rny,ess and e9 ess fie, OR D-1552-3 f 1320 CA,.. 1320 '4) 2640 0 N PROPOSED SUBSECTION 1/535 (C-2) OF THE SUBDI- VISION MAP ACT STATES THAT A SUBDIVISION DOES NOT /NCL UDE A DIVISION OF ANY REAL PROPERTY WHICH HAS: '%ANYPARCEL OR PARCELS DIVIDED INTO LOTS OR PARCELS; EACH OF GROSS AREA OF TWENTY (20) ACRES OR MORE, EACH OF WHICH HAS AN APPROVED ACCESS TO A MAINTAINED PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY. a WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AND A LOCAL REGULATING ORDINANCE IS IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING /S REQUIRED: /. A FIELD SURVEY WHEN FIVE OR MORE PARCELS ARE CREATED. 2. TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNING' BODY OR ADVISORY AGENCY. 3. FILING OF PARCEL MAP. DEDICATION BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT FOR STREET OPENING OR WIDENING OR EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED. NO IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED. IN THE CASE WHERE A FIELD SURVEY IS MADE, THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OR CITY ENGINEER SHALL EXAMINE THE MAP FOR THE SURVEY INFORMA- TION SHOWN THEREON, AND IF HE IS SATISFIED THAT IT IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT HE SHALL PLACE HIS CERTIFICATE ON THE MAP. SCALE: /'s 300' SHEET I OF / SHEET PARCEL MAP A/94 IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Filed for record' this 2No day of Moy /964 of 7A.M in Book / of Parcel Mops of Page / at the request of John Doe County Recorder BEING A DIV/S/ON OF ALL OF LOTS /7 To 22 OF TRACT N) 20/ RECORDED IN BOOK 306, PAGES / TO 5 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES This mop was prepared by me ar under my super✓ision 0/70'./.5 based upon a field survey in conformance with the requirements of the SvbdiviS/on Mop Act al the request of John Doe on April /964. / hereby. certify that it con forms to the approved tentative map and the conditions of approval thereof; that oil provisions of applicable State /ow and /oca/ ordinances have been complied with . LS or R.C.E. This map hos been examined this 2NO day of Moy /964, for eon farrnonce Pa-:;th the requirements of Section /157/ of the Subdivision Map Act County Surveyor/City Engineer 60 60 N� N /200 STREET 450 /5c: I( / I 450 f0 rovd easement of the County of Los Angeles per OR/800-25 ISO /O 1 9110 20' access easement per SR /800-27 600 7 600 600 20 rood easement at the County of Los Angeles per OR /800-25 samtory sewer easement of the County of Los Ante/es 26 per DR /800- 600 600 /O'raod easement of the County of Los Arige/es per OR /800-25 5 600 6 /200 60 to PROPOSED SUBSECTION //535 (c3) Of THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT STATES THAT A ,BUBO/VISION DOES NOT INCLUDE A DIV/SON OF ANY REAL PROPERTY WHERE THE FOLLOW/N6 CONDITIONS EXIST: 'ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND HAVING APPROVED ACCESS TO A PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY WHICH COMPRISES PART OfA TRACT OF LAND ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND WHICH HAS THE APPROVAL OF THE GOVERNING BODY AS TO STREET ALIGNMENTS AND WIDTHS. WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AND A LOCAL REGULATING ORDINANCE /S IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING /S REQUIRED: /. A FIELD SURVEY WHEN FIVE OR MORE PARCELS ARE CREATED. 2. TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR ADVISORY AGENCY 3. FILING OF PARCEL MAP. GOVERNING BODY MAY REQUIRE DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT Of PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREETS, HIGHWAYS, WAYS, OR EASEMENTS AS ARE NECESSARY FOR LOCAL TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE, AND SANITARY NEEDS IN THE CASE WHERE A FIELD SURVEY /5 MADE, THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OR CITY ENGINEER SHALL EXAMINE THE MAP FOR THE SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN THEREON, AND If HE IS SATISFIED THAT IT /S TECHNICALLY CORRECT HE SHALL PLACE HIS CERTIFICATE ON THE MAP. STREET /320 o / 40 k.. • /320 5 40 Ac. `I /320 (5280 /320 1 /320 2 40 Ac. /320 6 40 Ac. 3 40 Ac. 4 40 k. 1— /320 ' /320 —---_--rt ----_ 7 40 Ac. oI I op I— /320 I-- /320 1 I /320 N "1 I i 1 I lo 9 oI /0 0 11 40 Ac I 40 Ac. N rni d0 Ac. I I /320 ---1-- /320 -----L- 1320---- I I I N /3 NI /4 15 z,-) 40 k. 1 40 k. 40 Ac. I /320 /320 /320 N 8 40 Ac. /320 12 40 Ac. /320 N N 16 40 Ac. /320 5250 PROPOSED SUBSECTION //535 (C-40 OF THE SUBDIVISION /MAP ACT STATES THAT A SUBDIVISION DOES NOT /NCL UDE A DIV/S/ON OF ANY REAL PROPERTY WHERE THE FOLLOW/NG CONDITIONS EX/ST: 'ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND DIVIDED INTO LOTS OR PARCELS, EACH OF A GROSS AREA OF FORTY (40) ACRES OR MORE.' WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AS IL L USTRA TED /N TH/S BREAKDOWN OFA SECT/ON, NO SURVEYS. MAPS, DED/CA TI DNS, OR IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. Sheet fof / Shea/ PARCEL MAP Filed for reca-d >hs 2'7 day of Atoy, , /964 of 7PM rn gook / of Parcel Mops of /N THE UN ICORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA .2unfy h'ecerdrr _. RFIM :.1 niurinN nF I/77 7 nF 7RATr No P736 AS RECORDED /N BOOK 202, PAGE 5 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. re, s mop was r-epo, (0' by me ar Ono!' ray three 1an ',dwas omp.kd from record data rr, contormonee tht reyv,remeol5 of the Sobd.rs,on MOP Acl at '^t reaost r/ John Doe or Apr.! !, /964 / hoeOv eerfrfy that ,f conforms l9 /he opproved lea/O/,veh,op toad /he conditions of approval thereof rho, o// e,nvis'Ms 0/ app:%cob/e stale foe, and /o,:%/ ard,nance5 hart been tamp/td wi/h 5,9nrd and sealed ) L. 5 a- 17C E .YO Note Record dots is from 7i-oet NO 7/36, M 8 201 -5 Th.s mrp hos been exornrned Mrs 2r'dor o> .L'oy, /964 far ccn/°rrttwxc w�Jh the rtgr.vrements of Sec/ran/1:5/5 of The 5abd vrs,on Mop Al Canty Engineer O_ p' �r ti o� -/6100 � W' r�.f1T� .. p i f.-�'.ST �' NWta'/°/ %�� � irocl Al! 7735, .qt 08 707-5 STREET FAST SW is fa/7 Tree,' Ali 77,35. keg107-5 7136,418 20? .5 t12 /P feygedQCf /0034 per Tree/ N?I736 fd 17P !gyre' 2CE /20 ` /0034 Per Mx / S£em-/a/ 7 I No7736,MN707-5 Tart Al! 7786, 4/8 701-5 N° / SUBSECTION /1535 (8) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT STATES: "SUBDIVISION DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY PARCEL OR PARCELS OF LAND WHICH 1S D 1 VIDEO INTO FO//R OR LESS PARCELS." WHEN THE ABOVE CONDITIONS EXIST AND A LOCAL PECULATING ORDINANCE IS IN EFFECT, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: I TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNING BODY OR ADVISORY AGENCY. FILING OF PARCEL MAP THE PARCEL MAP MAY BE COMPILED FROM RECORD DATA WHEN SUFFICIENT SURVEY INFORMATION EXISTS AND WHEN LOCATION OF ANY BOUNDARY OF THE MAP IS CERTAIN. IN THE EVENT THE BOUNDARY OF THE MAP IS UNCERTAIN, DUE TO LAC/( OF EXISTING MONUMENTS OR POSSESSORY LINES, A FIELD SURVEY SHALL BE MADE. THE COUNTY ENGINEER OR CITY ENGINEER SHALL EXAM/NE THE MAP FOR THE INFORMATION SHOWN THEREON, AND IF HE SAT/SF/EDP/AT/T/5 TECHNICALLY CORRECT, HE SHALL PLACE HIS CERTIFICATE ON THE MAP, THE GOVERNING BODY MAY REQUIRE DEDICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREETS, HIGHWAYS, WAYS, OR EASEMENTS AS ARE NECESSARY FOR LOCAL TRAFFIC, DRAINAGE, AND SANITARY NEEDS. DEDICATIONS SHALL BE MADE BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT PRIOR TO FILING OF THE PARCEL MAP.