HomeMy Public PortalAbout08-05-2002PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA, MONDAY, AUGUST 5, 2002
The Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana met in regular session at 7:30 p.m., Monday,
August 5, 2002, in the Council Chambers in said City. President Bruce Wissel presided with the following
Councilmembers present: Howard "Jack" Elstro, Etta J. Lundy, Karl Sharp, Bing Welch, Larry Parker, Paul
Combs, Phil Dickman and Sarah "Sally" Hutton. The following business was conducted:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRAYER BY THE REV. DAVID LAYMAN
ROLL CALL
Nine present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of the July 15, 2002 meeting were approved on a motion by Councilmember Sharp, second by
Councilmember Hutton and the motion was carried on a voice vote
Councilmember Welch moved to add Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 to the agenda, second by Councilmember
Parker and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
PRESENTATION OF REMONSTRANCES, PETITIONS, MEMORIALS, INTRODUCTIONS,
MOTIONS AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
Misty Hollis of the City's Department of Community Development made a presentation of the recently
completed Housing Needs Assessment, pointing out the highlights which included the availability and
affordability of owner -occupied, rental, elderly and special needs housing; funding opportunities; housing
demand; and recommendations.
In summary, the needs assessment revealed that opportunities do exist to increase homeownership levels
throughout the City and to promote additional rental and owner -occupied housing rehabilitation activities
throughout the City; the target range for affordable owner -occupied housing in the City is approximately
$53,000 to $86,000 and for rental housing it is approximately $446 to $714 per month; additional assisted
living units for older adults would be supported by the Richmond community as well as "continuing care"
developments; and transitional housing is needed within the City. (The report in its entirety is on file in the
Clerk's office).
Hollis pointed out that the next step is to work with housing agencies in the Richmond community to reach
some of the action plans outlined in the study.
COMMUNICATION FROM THE MAYOR
Alluding to the comments made by Councihnember Combs at the July 15 Council meeting, Mayor Shelley
Miller said she felt that the administration has shown in the past few weeks that it is willing to look closely
at the actions of the Police Department and take any appropriate action. She added that that step had
already been taken on the very night of the fourth of July.
In the meantime, she said, Councilmember Combs had forwarded 14 complaints by citizens and the Police
Department, her office and the law department has gone above and beyond to contact each of the
complainants to explain the process about how the citizens review complaint works and the process that
Council established for circumstances such as this. She said that, at this point, regarding the specific tear
gas that was used at that event, no one has come forward with a complaint.
Addressing her comments to Councilmember Elstro, the Mayor said she was pleased to be able to tell him
that South L Street is closed and the railroad tracks are being fixed. She also commented that the
administration continues working with the Recycling Center on the entire project and anticipates the project
will be completed in this construction season.
Councilmember Combs commented that at the last meeting he had presented a proposal in regard to animal
control issues, suggesting that the animal control be taken out of the Police Department and additional
people be added to better serve the community.
Responding, the Mayor said she felt that animal control is best served within the Police Department at this
time, giving several reasons for that decision. These included training, backup and authority. She added that
the administration has looked at a number of options as far as getting additional manpower for the program.
Councilmember Combs said he would encourage those who had filed complaints with him about the July 4
incident to come forward and make their complaints known.
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 2
Mayor Miller said that the only citizens who have come forward have confirmed the information that was
in the police report, adding that the administration can only work with the information provided. She stated
that had she or the Police Chief been aware that Councilmember Combs wished to discuss the July 4 event
at that meeting b oth would have made sure there was ample representation to answer any questions he
might have had. In the future, she said, if he would let them know beforehand they would be glad to be in
attendance and answer his questions.
President Wissel reminded Councilmember Combs that when he has issues with the administration it
should first be addressed with the individuals they concern, and then if he has a problem that needs to be
brought to the attention of the public he can do it at Council meetings. He added that he should have his
homework done before that happens.
REPORT FROM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY
President Wissel said the minutes of the meetings of July 3, 11 and 18, 2002 were in their packets.
REPORTS FROM DEPARTMENT HEADS
David West of the Sanitation Department presented a brief overview of the Master Plan that is being
implemented, stating that he had distributed information to the Councilmembers updating them on the
actions taken. He said that throughout the years there have been problems such as flooding and sewers that
need to be repaired, to name only two, and he said the department is at the point where it is going to begin
addressing some of these issues and the public is going to begin to see some results.
He said the Richmond Sanitary District staff, in conjunction with the Sanitary District Board and the City
Engineers Department and the Mayor's office had reviewed all the information presented by the consultant
firms before final approval was given. He said over the next 10 years the projected improvement budget for
the Master Plan is approximately $43 million which is an average of a little more than $4 million per year.
West said that projects for 2002 that fall under the Mater Plan include the South 6`h and Q Streets storm
project, South 8t' Street, North West 1P Street and South West 15`h and West Main. He also listed
additional projects which included sewer extensions as well as rehabs, along with several others. He said
that in 2003 there will be six CSO projects (Combined Sewer Overflow) -and 9 storm projects.
He fielded a question coming from Councilmember Combs about raccoons in the storm drains in specific
neighborhoods on North West K and South 4a` Streets, saying that they will seal off all of those so they
don't get infiltration. He said he would be glad to take a look at the area in question to see what can be
done. Councilmember Combs said he had contacted Cope Environmental Center about how to deal with the
raccoons and had information about that if citizens who have such problems wish to contact him
In answer to a question by Councilmember Welch, West said the Sanitation Department is still using the
input of the Senior Citizens Advisory Committee and invited Councilmembers to the next meeting of that
group at 6:30 p.m Wednesday, August 14. West said he intends to visit each and every neighborhood that
is going to be impacted by the projects to let them know what is going on.
REPORTS FROM STANDING COMMITTEES
REPORTS FROM SPECIAL COMMITTEES
REPORTS FROM ORGANIZATIONS
MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
Councilmember Elstro moved to suspend the rules and read Ordinances No. 59, 60, 62 and 63 - 2002 by
■ title only, and No. 66 - 2002 in its entirety, second by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on
a voice vote.
ORDINANCE NO. 59 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 — A SPECIAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
APPROVAL OF A STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FOR A PROPERTY OWNER APPLYING FOR
DEDUCTIONS UNDER I.C. 6-1.1 — 12.1 AND SPECIFICALLY 6-1.1 — 12.1-7 (UPTOWN AREA)
President Wissel said the ordinance deals with an abatement request by Paul W. Lingle Revocable Trust,
adding that this comes u nder the n ewly adopted ordinance for economic development t arget area in t he
uptown area. He said he had met with Lingle to tour the property at 600 East Main Street which is going to
be used by the Bureau of Motor Vehicles which will be moving to this location and it will be a retention of
18 jobs that are currently there.
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 3
In addition to that, the branch would also serve as a regional center for people who have to make special
arrangements to get their licenses back and that would necessitate the hiring of five additional employees.
He said this is what is along -the line of what this ordinance was designed to do, and that is to bring
investment money back into the uptown area, and will also bring jobs. He said this is the type of operation
that would attract nearly everyone on this side of the County at some point in the year.
He said the request is for a five-year tax abatement with an estimated value of $80,500, adding that the
current wage is almost the same as what the average industrial wage is for the present 18 jobs and provides
health insurance benefits. He said there are time constraints on this and it has been requested that the rules
be suspended and the ordinance be advanced through all three readings tonight.
Councilmember Sharp moved to suspend the rules on Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 and move to second
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Parker and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 on second reading.
President Wissel declared Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 on public hearing.
Speaking in favor of the ordinance was Paul W. Lingle, who said he felt that this would be a boost to the
uptown area. He said he hoped that this would serve as a catalyst that will begin to bring some new life
there, adding that when you begin to make things happen then other things begin happening.
Councilmember Elstro asked if there would be restrooms within the area that would be available to the
public. Lingle said he did not know, but the BMV could make them open to the public if they chose to do
so. In answer to a question by Councilmember Combs, Lingle said there are no guarantees about how long
the BMV would stay in the building, but he assured him that they would be there longer than the
abatement. Councilmember Lundy added her comments about the concern she has about availability of the
restrooms.
Councilmember Welch said he also had concerns about the availability of parking and addressed his
remarks to Norma Schroeder, the City Clerk, who assured him that the issue is being addressed in meetings
with the Parking Advisory Committee which is also meeting with the Mayor. Councilmember Dickman
commented that he is happy to see the BMV coming back to the uptown area.
There being no further comments either for or against the ordinance, Councilmember Hutton moved for
engrossment, second by Councilmember Welch and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councilmember Lundy moved to suspend the rules and advance Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 to third and final
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 on third reading.
Ordinance No. 59 — 2002 was adopted on a unanimous roll call vote.
ORDINANCE NO.60 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 60 — 2002 — AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE TO BE KNOWN AS
THE 2003 FIREFIGHTER AND POLICE OFFICER SALARY ORDINANCE
City Attorney Bob Bever reminded Councilmembers that in 2000, three-year contracts were reached during
negotiations with the Police and Fire Departments, and as a result of those it was set in place what would be
salaries with percentage increases each year for the following years, ending with 2003. He said this Council
approved those contracts but couldn't approve the salaries that went with them until this time of year.
President Wissel said this ordinance would be held on second reading and would be brought back at the
next Council meeting.
ORDINANCE NO.62 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 — AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SUBMITTAL, ACCEPTANCE, AND APPROPRIATION OF A GRANT FROM THE INDIANA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Explaining this ordinance was Tony Foster of the City's Community Development department who said
this is in regard to an annual grant that is submitted to the Indiana Department of Transportation for
Roseview Transit. He said this year the request is for $808,327 for operating and capital expenses. He said
the local match is $110,868 which comes out of the general fund. He explained the breakdown of the grant
proceeds, saying that $705,277 will go for operating expenses and $103,050 will be used for capital
expenses.
LJ
1
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 4
Foster said the capital expenses include a new bus, a new van and new radio equipment as well as a small
shelter to go over the new gas tanks that were installed with last year's grant. He said they are keeping the
additional drivers for the evening routes in the grant for this year because it has been a success, serving its
purpose attracting new riders. He also said the Paratransit is doing extremely well. In answer to a question
by Councilmember Dickman, Foster said the ridership on the evening service is between 20 and 25 and
continues to grow on a monthly basis. He said the evening route is called a point deviation route which has
the flexibility to go off the route if it needs to serve the needs of the riders.
Councilmember Welch moved to suspend the rules on Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 and move to second
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Dickman and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 on second reading.
President Wissel declared Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 on public hearing. There being no comments either for
or against the ordinance, Councilmember Elstro moved for engrossment, second by Councilmember Welch
and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councilmember Parker moved to suspend the rules and advance Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 to third and final
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 on third reading.
Ordinance No. 62 — 2002 was adopted on a unanimous roll call vote.
ORDINANCE NO. 63 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 63 — 2002 — AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SUBMITTAL, ACCEPTANCE, AND APPROPRIATION OF A GRANT FROM, THE CORPORATION
FOR NATIONAL SERVICES
Martha Young, director of Retired Senior Volunteer Program explained that this ordinance deals with a
request for a grant for $36,760 which would cover salaries and volunteer needs and recognition. She added
that the local match is for $12,331 which is acquired by donations, fund raising and a small amount from
the City.
Councilmember Elstro moved to suspend the rules on Ordinance No. 63 — 2002 and move to second
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Welch and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 63 — 2002 on second reading.
President Wissel declared Ordinance No. 63 — 2002 on public hearing. There being no comments either for
or against the ordinance, Councilmember Elstro moved for engrossment, second by Councilmember Sharp
and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councilmember Welch moved to suspend the rules and advance Ordinance No. 63 — 2002 to third and final
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Dickman and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance.No. 63 — 2002 on third reading.
Ordinance No. 63 — 2002 was adopted on a unanimous roll call vote.
ORDINANCE NO.66 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 — A SPECIAL ORDINANCE AUITHORIZING THE CITY OF
RICHMOND TO RECEIVE A DONATION
"WHEREAS, the City of Richmond, Indiana, has the option of accepting or rejecting donations for a
specific purpose; and
"WHEREAS, the acceptance of a donation for a specific purpose constitutes the appropriation of such
property for the intended purpose.
"NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Common Council of the City of Richmond, Indiana, that the
following donations made to the City of Richmond for the Richmond Boys and Girls Club Youth Mappers
shall be accepted and gratefully acknowledged by the citizens of Richmond:
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 5
"JC Penney Co., Inc. — 20 Pen and Pencil Sets and $5.00 off Hair Salon Coupons
"Mc Donald's Restaurants — 20 Free All American Coupons
"Rax Restaurants — 20 Free Roast Beef Sandwich Coupons
"Richmond Square Mall — 20 Free All American Meal Coupons."
Councilmember Welch asked about the meaning of the term "Youth Mappers," and the Mayor explained
that this is a program through the Boys and Girls Club and the City sponsored a grant that they had applied
for. She said it is a group of young adults who went throughout the community interviewing businesses, the
city building and the county building to discuss what resources are available to youth to find out what we
have a nd what we d on't have a nd t o b egin t o make s ome d eterminations a nd r ecommendations for t he
community.
Councilmember Welch moved to suspend the rules on Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 and move to second
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 on second reading.
President Wissel declared Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 on public hearing. There being no comments either for
or against the ordinance, Councilmember Elstro moved for engrossment, second by Councilmember Welch
and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councihnember Lundy moved to suspend the rules and advance Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 to third and final
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Elstro and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 on third reading.
Ordinance No. 66 — 2002 was adopted on a unanimous roll call vote.
ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING AND ENGROSSMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 32 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 32 — 2002 — A SPECIAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING- THE
APPROVAL OF A STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FOR A PROPERTY OWNER APPLYING FOR
DEDUCTIONS UNDER I.C. 6-1.1-12.1
Councihnember.Welch said this should be held on second reading since no update of information has been
received from Smith Dairy. President Wissel suggested that Councilmember Welch contact Smith Dairy to
determine what their next move will be.
ORDINANCE NO.46 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 46 — 2002 — A GENERAL ORDINANCE AMENDING CERTAIN
SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 154 OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND CODE REGARDING FLOODING
Explaining this ordinance was Wayne Jackson of the Permits and Inspections Department who said this
ordinance is a result of correspondence the City received from the Department of Natural Resources
wherein the state had changed some of its rules and this is to merely bring the City into compliance. He
said some of the rules are a little bit more relaxed than they used to be and the City has the option as to
whether or not it participates in the national flood insurance program. However, he said, if the City doesn't
participate, the folks that live in those flood plain districts have no coverage. He said the City currently has
34 insurance policies representing about $2.7 million in coverage.
Councilmember Parker asked how homeowners get this policy and Jackson said the lending institutions
require that you carry flood insurance and, by law, it is mandated if the lending institution uses federal
funds. President Wissel said this is not available to those who do not live in a designated flood plain
because it is a federally funded program which can be purchased through a local insurance agent. Jackson
said there are flood plain maps which designate these areas.
President Wissel announced that this ordinance is on public hearing. There being no comments either for or
against the ordinance, Councilmember Elstro moved for engrossment, second by Councilmember Hutton
and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 6
Bever pointed out that there is a typo under No. 3 and asked that it be amended to read 154.38 and on the
second page, under No. 6, he said it should be changed to "zoning director.."
Councilmember Elstro moved to amend Ordinance No. 46 — 2002, second by Councilmember Parker and
the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councilmember Welch moved to suspend the rules and advance Ordinance No. 46 — 2002 to third and final
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 46 — 2002 on third reading.
Ordinance No. 46 — 2002 was adopted on a unanimous roll call vote.
ORDINANCE NO. 56 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 56 — 2002 — A SPECIAL ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
APPROVAL OF A STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FOR A PROPERTY OWNER APPLYING FOR
DEDUCTIONS UNDER I.C. 6-1.1-12.1
Councilmember E lstro a xplained t his o rdinance d eals with B& F P lastics a t 814 S outh L Street a nd a
request fora 1 0-year tax abatement on new manufacturing equipment with an estimated new value of
$585,000. He said the jobs retained will be 43 and new jobs will number 10.
President Wissel said this ordinance is on public hearing. There being no comments either for or against the
ordinance, Councilmember Welch moved for engrossment, second by Councilmember Hutton and the
motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councilmember Welch moved to suspend the rules and advance Ordinance No. 56 — 2002 to third and final
reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice
vote.
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 56 — 2002 on third reading.
Ordinance No. 56 — 2002 was adopted on a unanimous roll call vote.
ORDINANCE NO.57 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 57 — 2002 — A SPECIAL ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP
AT UNIMPROVED REAL ESTATE ON WILLIAMSBURG PIKE, RICHMOND, INDIANA
This ordinance was explained by President Wissel who gave a report on the Planning Commission meeting
where a public hearing was conducted on this ordinance on July 25, 2002. He said the petitioners had
amended their special use request to include just 5 acres of the 8.819 acres listed on the ordinance. He said
the request was to establish mini -warehouses on the M-2 zoned site which can only be done as a special use
authorized by Council. He said the staff recommended that there be only access point to the site located at
the a xisting t raffic signal. He s aid t hey a lso r ecommended t hat t he d eveloper i s t o p rovide for t he n ew
traffic signal face and its installation by RP & L. He said the access point is also to serve the approximately
3 acres to be developed later. He added that the Commission voted 6 to 1 in favor of the special use for this
property. He said he was the one negative vote on this and since then he has lessened his stand on that after
talking to Jim Hizer of the Economic Development Corp. who pointed out some of the topography
problems that lessens the use of that property for industrial use.
Bob Goodwin, Planning Director, explained that the traffic signal there is in front of the old Alcoa plant
and it actually has a face on it for traffic going north, and going south and for people exiting the plant. He
said these people are going to be on the opposite side so there is no face there with lights on it.
Councilmember Parker said he doesn't foresee that much traffic on Williamsburg Pike and he hates to see
the traffic slowed down anymore than is absolutely necessary.
President Wissel said this ordinance is on public hearing. Speaking in favor of the ordinance was Attorney
George Sowers, but he said he would like to defer to Dave Kam, of Kam Properties and Greg Gustin, one
of the owners of American Self Storage.
Kam explained that he bought this ground several years ago from Council acting as the Board of Directors
of RP & L, intending to expand his business but because of a change in ownership of one of the businesses
he dealt with he has found he does not need the land.
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 7
Gustin said he had been in Richmond for nearly a year now and has found a lot of things here that he likes.
He explained that he has storage units in Ohio which include Cincinnati, Middletown, Lebanon, Sidney,
Hamilton, Troy and he hopes Richmond and Connersville are the next two. He said self storage is what he
has been dealing in for the past 15 years.
He addressed the issues which came to light in the Planning Commission meeting, mentioning the signal
light which he said he didn't have a problem with. He also said he had asked for two curb cuts and the
Planning Commission had recommended only one be made. He assured Council that his company would
do whatever it could to make this development as attractive as possible. He said he had selected
Williamsburg Pike because of the traffic count and the visibility.
Returning to the podium, S owers said using this for the mini -warehouses would be a consistent and an
excellent transitional use for the land. He said there is an investment of $2 million and the photos in his
brochures are of actual existing facilities. He said he believes it is an excellent use for this property. He said
he would ask that this be moved to third reading tonight.
Councilmember Sharp asked what happens to the other 3.9 acres of land, and Sowers said Kam owns it and
it is on the market. Councilmember Welch said there is a drainage ditch on the back side of the property
and Gustin told him that they had set aside almost an acre of land to hold the surface water and then be
discharged. He explained it to the satisfaction of Councilmember Welch.
Councilmember Parker asked if the apartment requested on the site is within the special use request and
Bever explained that since it is necessary, it could be made a part of the conditions of the ordinance. He
also asked about the time frame and whether or not it is within Council's jurisdiction to set a time frame
and Bever said it could be made a condition of this.
Councilmember Parker moved to amend the ordinance and add as a condition of compliance to the
ordinance that the construction of at least the front three buildings be completed on or before two years
from the date of passage of this ordinance and to allow for an apartment in the manager's facility, second
by Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice vote. There being no further comments
either for or against the ordinance, Councilmember Elstro moved for engrossment, second by
Councilmember Sharp and the motion was carried on a voice vote.
Councilmember Lundy moved to suspend the rules and advance Amended Ordinance No. 57 — 2002 to
third and final reading and read by title only, second by Councilmember Elstro and the motion was carried
on a voice vote.
The Clerk read Amended Ordinance No. 57 — 2002 on third reading.
Councilmember Welch said he had mixed emotions about this particular request and this particular use for
this land. He said as the Board of Directors of RP & L Councilmembers made a specific point not to sell off
what he would call "frontage lots" on Williamsburg Pike. He said they had used Kramer and Associates to
divide that 70 acres land that was sold in that parcel into pie shaped lots so that they were large enough and
situated sufficiently to be developed by small industrial concerns such as Amcast and Ralston Purina who
are currently located on pieces of that land. He said he still maintains that the best use of that land would be
small industrial type businesses.
He said he looks at the remaining 3.6 acres and he questions who will buy that land and how it would be
used. He said he feels that this request starts the frontage development of Williamsburg Pike which is the
very thing that Councilmembers, acting as RP & L Board members, chose not to do when RP & L sold the
land originally. Therefore, he said, he would be voting against the adoption of this ordinance.
Ordinance No. 57 — 2002 was adopted on an 8 to 1 roll call vote with Councilmember Welch casting the
only opposing vote.
ORDINANCE NO.58 — 2002
The Clerk read Ordinance No. 58 — 2002 — A GENERAL ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-
STATING SECTIONS 74.24 AND 74.47 OF RICHMOND CODE
Foster explained that the changes to this ordinance have not been included and asked that this ordinance be
held until Council's next meeting.
ORDINANCES ON THIRD READING
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Common Council Minutes Cont'd
August 5, 2002
Page 8
CALL FOR ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, on a motion duly made, seconded and passed, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:30 P.M.
ATTEST:
Norma Schroeder, Clerk
Bruce Wissel, President