HomeMy Public PortalAbout2013.070 (06-04-13)RESOLUTION NO. 2013.070
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013 -14
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution states that the total
annual appropriation subject to limitations of each government entity shall not
exceed the appropriation limit of such entity of government, except for prior year
adjustments in the cost -of- living or personal income and population, as noted in
Article XIIIB and State Statues; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, and
section 7900 et seq. of the California Government Code, the City of Lynwood is
required to set its appropriation limit for each fiscal year by Resolution, and
approve appropriate inflation and population factors used in calculating the limit;
and
WHEREAS, the total annual appropriation subject to limitation has been
computed in accordance with provisions set forth in Article XIIIB, Government
Code Section 7900 et seq. and Proposition 111; and
WHEREAS, detailed documentation used in calculating the appropriation
limit for FY 2014 is available for review on file in the Finance and Administration
Department, and a summary is provided in the attached Exhibit "C ", which is
incorporated as a part of this Resolution for reference.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
DOES HEREBY FIND, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section'1. That the City reserves the right to adjust or amend the
appropriation limit based upon use of alternative growth factors as authorized by
Proposition 111 if such changes or revisions would result in an advantageous
appropriation limit, now or in the future.
Section 2. That the City of Lynwood's Appropriation Limit for FY 2014 is
$29,083,504 as calculated under Exhibit "C ".
Section 3. That the growth factors used in calculating the FY 2014
Appropriation Limit shall be the percentage change in California per capita
income and the percentage change in population in the City of Lynwood.
Section 4. The Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2013:;
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Fred Galante, City Attorney
Salvador Alatorre Mayor,
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
1 }
Roge .. Haley, City 1�nage'r
manda Roberson, Director,
Finance
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the
City of Lynwood at a regular meeting held in the City Hall of said City on the 4th
day of June 2013, and passed by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS CASTRO, SANTILLAN -BEAS, MORTON,
RODRIGUEZ AND ALATORRE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
aria Quinonez, Cit Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City
Council of said City, do hereby certify that the above and forgoing is a full, true
and correct copy of Resolution No. 2013.070 on file in my office and that said
Resolution was adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated. Dated this 4th
day of June, 2013.
JUNE 4, 2013 REVENUE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2013 -14
Revenue Categories:
Taxes 27, 273,130
Licenses /Perm its 434,750
Revenue from Other Agencies 17,240,992
Charges for Services 13,748,850
Other Revenue . 4,409,904
Fines, Forfeits & Penalties 1,582,000
Revenue from Money /Prop 729,266
Total Revenues 65,418,892
Taxes (Exclude Interest)
27,273,130
Non -taxes (Exclude Interest)
38,071,589
Total - Taxes and Non -Taxes
65,344,719
Add: Interest
74,173
Total - Taxes, Non -Taxes & Interest
65,418,892
Interest Distribution ( %):
Allocation for Taxes
41.74% 30,958
Allocation for Non -Taxes
58.26% 43,215
Total Interest
100.00% 74,173
Revenue Summary:
Taxes plus interest 27,304,088
Non -Taxes plus Interest 38,114,804
Total Revenues 65,418,892
H-
EXHIBIT C
JUNE 4, 2013
APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
EXHIBIT C
2013 -14:
*Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 5.12 percent
*Population Change (Lynwood) = 1.02 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living Converted to a Ratio:
5.12+100 = 1.05120
POPULATION
Population increase Converted to a Ratio:
APPROPRIATION
YEAR
CPI
CHANGE % *
FACTOR*
LIMIT **
FY
1986 -87 BASE YEAR
8,490,630
FY
2000 -2001 (Recalculated)
17,267,822
FY
2001 -2002 (Recalculated)
7.82%
1.09611
18,927,227
FY
2002 -2003 (Recalculated)
-1.27%
1.63%
1.00480
19,017,609
FY
2003 -2004 (Recalculate, d)
2.31%
1,03%
1.04010
19,779,900
FY
2004 -2005 (Recalculated)
3.28%
0.611%
1.04710
20,710,597
FY
2005 -2006 (Recalculated)
5.26%
0,31%
1.06500
22,057,214
FY
2006 -2007 (Recalculated)
3.96%
0.35%
1.04700
23,109,539
FY
2007 -2008 (Recalculated)
4.42%
120%
1.05170
24,304,724
FY
2008 -2009 (Recalculated)
4.29%
1.31%
1.05190
25,565,384
FY
2009 -2010 (Recalculated)
4.35%
1.11%
1.01530
25,955,404
FY
2010 -2011 (Recalculated)
-2.54%
0.53%
0.98270
25,506,095
FY
2011- 2012(Recalculated)
2.51%
0.77%
1.02900
26,245,654
FY
2012 -2013
3.77%
0.56%
1.04350
27,387,602
2013 -14:
*Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 5.12 percent
*Population Change (Lynwood) = 1.02 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living Converted to a Ratio:
5.12+100 = 1.05120
100
Population increase Converted to a Ratio:
1.02+100 = 1.01020
100
Calculation of Factor for FY 2013 -2014:
1.05120 x 1.01020 = 1.06192
Calculation of Appropriation Limit $27,387,602 x 1.06192 = $29,083,504
(Prior Year's Appropriation Limit Multiplied by Factor)
STATUS OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT FY 2013 -2014
Maximum Appropriation Limit 29,083,504
(1) Proceeds of Taxes (less Retirement Taxes + Interest Allocation for Taxes) 24,641,750
Under Maximum Appropriation Limit 4,441,754
Over Maximum Appropriation Limit 0
(1) ( +) Proceeds of Taxes 27,273,130
( -j Retirement Taxes 2,662,338
( +) Interest Alloc. on Proceeds of Taxes 30,958
Total 24,641,750
*Source: State Department of Finance
Z
m
P
N
0
m
m
Z
C
C
{
N
D
r
{
m
D
.T
i
N
O
m
x
x
w
.i
C1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
>
>
>>>
-0
J
J
J
J
V
0
OT
W
O
A
A
W
W
W'
N
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O_O
O
O
O
d
O
(T
O
(T
(P
O
(T
tT
O
(n
(T
O
(n
Ut
N
N
N
N
O
m
D
;G
N
N
T p
Q
p
p
y J
0 0
d
C
N
d
O
O
CD x
O] d
d
@
d
O
J
OJ
N
0
0
0
0 0
d
O
O
O
O
O
3
x
3
3
3
3
�!
�`
ci
N
C
i
N
d
W
(A
fn
W
N=
C
C
d
r
•p
.()
D
Q
t0
N
O
c
c
N
c
O
c
c
m
r
N
O
3
vi
m
Q
n
m
J
c
3
c
¢
o
o
m
o
m
m
m
m
<o0
?
D
T
m
p
a
a
a
a
3
m
m
3
A
3
3
3
3 3
y
¢
e
D
N
p
J
J
d
D7
(O
D)
O
W
A
O
tit
O
W
W
N
V
N
O
(O
O
O
O
N
O
(T
O
O
O
w
m
V
b r
n
m m
N
w
O
a z
N
<o
m 3 0
0
o
W
w
N n
A
O
W
O
O
N N
o
O
A p
N
(T
O
W
1
A
O
O
pJ
O T
N
d W N
0o
u
A
'p O m
(T
O
O
D)
d
V
O
O
W
m
O
O
(O
O
O
W
O
V
(D
N
N
m
O
O
(p
A
' W
Ip
�
i
O
N
O
bt
O
O
,
O�
N
W
A
O
O
,
,
•
•
•
,
,
,
O
N
w
(D
O
O
V
X
0
0
0
A
N
W
W
O
O
m
O
W
Z
m
P
N
0
m
m
Z
C
C
{
N
D
r
{
m
D
.T
i
N
O
m
x
x
w
.i
C1
Z
A
N
0
7J
m
G
m
Z
C
N
C
D
D
r
m
D
A
N
O
N
O
A
m
x
x
m
O
T
N
N
N
Z
O
.il
W
c
T
T O
fn
T cn
O
m C
O
T
3
n
^.
0
c c
c d
Om
m
o
c m
c
m
o m
c
m
d
w
w
c
a
¢ o
m
n �°
D
o
n n
m
¢ O
n
_.
=
O
m
O
o
o
o
S
n
o
O
a
O
Q
n
of
D
W
A
C
r
O
N
C O
t0
T w
w
B
d
O
Q
D
T
c
n
w
d
N
7 3
Gl
N
G:
W
OJ
w
T
d
55.
A
G:
G
n
.�
T
T
n
p')
O
m
om
'n
c
0
C
y
m
o
m
o
c
°m
m?
n
O
�o
�.
w
p
w
T
C
3
6
i
d
tT
O
X
d
0
0
T r
n
d m
3
w
c0
N
�O A
OTA
(O
(T
N
Ol
O
A
W
7 S O O
W
f0
O
N
O
m
Or
O ry 3 3
d
O)
N
O
N
O
O]
N
w
0
0
0
z
� O
O S
� N
Q�
N O T
N
y N
m w
w
y 3 T m
'O m
o M
N
C d 3 7
i
i
i
i
r
i
r
i
r
d
N
W
O
W
O
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
O
D
O
d
W
— J
p w
O
V
N
W
Ip
[O
N
N
(T
O
A
W
OJ
N
OJ
d^
W
O
O
N
O
O
O)
(n
N
OJ
O
V
O
W
O
O
W
O
O
O
(O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
A
N
0
7J
m
G
m
Z
C
N
C
D
D
r
m
D
A
N
O
N
O
A
m
x
x
m
O
m
x
m '
n
i
L
C
m
D
0p
r
V
m
m
O
W
m
ti
A
A
A
A
w
j
Z
m
Z
O
N
0
N
R 00
O 00
c0
dG
O c0
`G
O
d
p d
W
m
m m
m
��
p
;u
3 dm
�
w
9n.
N
yw
0
j
J
°
d
O
N
N
O
<
<
N
D
m
T
d
d
<
J
N
d
L
m
m
c
A
A
m
N
¢
(If
p
¢
T
c
d
¢
_
J
J
J
n
<
<
<
<
j
C
N
T
6
ry
Z
d
ry
O
C7
d
n
N
n
¢
VI
m
N
d
y
p
m
�
w
w
w
D
N
N
V
V
�
N
N
d
V
W
V
W
%
N
W
W
O
O
� r
n
A
d
� d
W
O
m
V
O T d
Z
A
V
p 5-0
J
o
a
3
m
w
�
N
D
w
o
N n
m
x
m
0
o
o
D
r
H.
m
d l
O
N
N
�
�
p
p N
N
V
V
N
N
W
V 3
m
m
m
m
3 C
j
m
m
f0
V
v
OI
Ol
O
O
A
V
(O
O
O
O
M
�
d
V
m
O
O
m
J
b
N
N
W
m
m
N
W
m
O7
m
x
m '
n
i
a � i
III �
+i DEPARTMENT OF Eomulvo G..6ROwH
Q-,. - --F 1 N A N C E ar.T� C.p,T�l .Roo , , 4� . s.�R.Me- �A . s3a, —
OFFICE OF THE PIRECTOR
May 2013
Dear Fiscal Officer:
Subject: Price and Population Information
Appropriations Limit
The California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 2227, mandates.the-Department of Finance to transmit
an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use
their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2013, in conjunction with a change in the cost of
living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2013 -14. Attachment A provides
the change in Ca)ifomia s per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and'
population percentage change factor to calculate the 2013 -14 appropriations limit. 'Attachment B provides .
city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides population
percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population, percentage change
data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations.
Population Percent Change for Special Districts
Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and Taxation
Code section 2228 for further information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XI I I B, section 9(C), of
the State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate.
The Code and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website:
hftg:Hleqinfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtmi.
Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of
their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this issue should be referred to their respective
county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself: No state agency reviews the local
appropriations limits.
Population Certification
The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. - Revenue and Taxation Code
section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current
certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the
State Controller by June 1, 2013.
Please Note: Prior years city population estimates may be revised.
If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at
(916) 323 -4086.
ANA J. MATOSANTOS
Director
By:
MICHAEL COHEN
Chief Deputy Director
Attachment
May 2013
Attachment A
A. Price Factor: Article XII I B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living
factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost
of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage
change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used
in setting the fiscal year 2013 -14 appropriation limit is:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Year Percentage change
(FY) over prior year
2013 -14 5.12
B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2013 -14
appropriation limit.
2013 -14:
Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 5.12 percent
Population Change = 0.79 percent
Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio:
Population converted to a ratio:
Calculation of factor for FY 2013 -14:
5.12 +100 - 1.0512
100
0.79+100 =11.0079
100
1.0512 x 1.0079 = 1.0595
Fiscal Year 2013 -14
'Exclusions include residents an federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental instituti ons,. state and
federal correctional institutions and veteran. homes. -
Attachment
'
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions`
January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2013. and Total Population, January l,'2013
-
Total
County
Percent Change
Population Minus Exclusions -
Population
city
2012.2013
1 -1 -12
- 1-1-13
1 -1 -2013.
Los Angeles
a
Agoura Hills
0.45
- 20,424
20,516
20,516
Alhambra
- 0.64
83,703
84,240.
_
'- 84,240 - -
Arcadia
0.52
- 56,574
56,866
56,866
Artesia
0.48
16,516
16,595
16,681
Avalon
0.40
3,782
3,797
3,797
Azusa
2.03
46,640 ..
- .47,586
47,586 - -
Baldwin Park
0.59
75.868
76,315
- 76,315'
Bell
0.44
35,625
35,783
- 35,783
Beli lower
0.45
76,945
77,289
77,289
Bell Gardens
0.44
42,252
42,437
42,437 '
Beverly Hills
0.54
34,308
34,494
34,494
Bradbury
0.75
1,066
1,074
1;074
Burbank
0.48
104,480
104,982
104,982
Calabasas
0.45
23,695
23,802
23,802
Carson
0.35
91;874
92,196
92,196
Cerritos
0.45
49,248
49,470
49,470
Claremont
- 1.23
35,315
35;749
_: .35;749
Commerce
0.45
12,877
12,935
- 12;935
Compton
0.46
97,106
97,549 -
97,549
Covina
0.61
48,062
.48,357,
. - 48,357 .
Cudahy
0.45-
23;905
24,013
•24,013 -
Culver City
0.48
39,024
- 39.210
39,210
Diamond Bar
0.45
55,847
:56,099
56,099 -
Downey
0.45
112;257
112,761
- 112,761
Duarte
0,62
21,421 -
: 21,554
_•
• '21,554
El Monte
0.41
113,969
114,436
. 114,438.
El Segundo
0.45
16,729
_16,804
16,804
Gardena
0.70
59,153
59,566
59,566 -
Glendale
0.47
192;750
193,652
193,652
Glendora
0.56
50;386
50,666.
50,666- -_
Hawaiian Gardens
0.45
14,310
14,375
- 14,375- "
Hawthorne
0.45
85.089
85,474 -
85,474.
Hermosa Beach
0.35
19,584
19,653
191653
Hidden Hills
0.91
1,870
1,887.
1,887
Huntington Park
0.46
58,358
58,624
58,624
Industry
0.23
436
437
437 -
Inglewood
0.45
110,678
111,171
_
111,171
Irwindale
2.68
1,416
�. '1,454
1,454
La Canada Ftintridge 0.47
20,346
20,441.
20,441' -
'Exclusions include residents an federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental instituti ons,. state and
federal correctional institutions and veteran. homes. -
Fiscal Year 2013 -14
Attachment B
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions"
January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2013 and Total Population, January 1, 2013
'Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Total
County
Percent Change
- Population Minus Exclusions --
Population
city
2012 -2013
1 -1 -12
1 -1.13
1.1 -2013
La Habra Heights
0.45
5,355
5,379
5,379
Lakewood
0.45
80,418
80,781
80,761
La Mirada
0.43
48,7220
46,930
48,930
Lancaster
0.56
152,866
153,717
158,630
La Puente
0.53
40,008
40,222
40,222
La Veme
1.80
31,476
32,041
32,041
Lawndale
0.46
32,907
33,058
33,058
Lomita
0.54
20.406
20.516
20,516
Long Beach
0.59
464,784
467,538
467,646
Los Angeles
0.95
3,824,199
3,860,719
3,863,839
Lynwood
1.02
69,931
70,645
70,645 ✓
Malibu
0.48
12,706
12,767
12,767
Manhattan Beach
0.47
35,257
35,423
35,423
Maywood
0.45
27,486
27,610
27,610
Monrovia
0,54
36,745
36,943
36,943
Montebello
0.47
62,869
63,184
63,184
Monterey Park
0.43
61,184
61,445
61,445
Norwalk
0.29
105,132
105,439
106,093
Palmdale
0.49
153,785
154,535
154,535
Palos Verdes Estates
0.49
13,523
13,589
13,589
Paramount
0.42
54,395
54,624
54,624
Pasadena
0.52
139,291
140,020
140,020
Pico Rivera
0.53
63,199
63,534
63,534
Pomona
066
148,729
150,724
150,942
Rancho Palos Verdes
0.47
41,901
42,097
42,114
Redondo Beach
0.53
67,041
67,396
67,396
Rolling Hills
0.43
1,876
1,884
1,884
Rolling Hills Estates
0.49
8,101
8,141
8,141
Rosemead
0.49
54,199
54,464
54,464
San Dimas
0.51
33,516
33,686
33,686
San Fernando
1.33
23,764
24,079
24,079
San Gabriel
0.52
39,945
40,153
40,153
San Marino
0.33
13,202
13,246
13,246
Santa Clahta
15.44
177,534
204,951
204,951
Santa Fe Springs
177
16,479
16,771
16,816
Santa Monica
0..86
90,267
91,040
91,040
Sierra Madre
0.49
10,969
11,023
11,023
Signal Hill
0.75
11,135
11,218
11,218
South El Monte
0.55
20,200
20,312
20,312
South Gate
079
94,367
95,115
95,115
South Pasadena
0.47
25,737
25,857
25,857
'Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2013 -14
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and,
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
Attachment B
-
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions'..,
.
January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2013 and Total Population, January 1, 2013 ,
County
Percent, Chancie,
— Population
Minus Exdusions —
Total
Population
City
2012.2013
1.1 -12
14.13
1N -2013'
Temple city
0.52
- .35,766
35,952'
Torrance
0.46
146;188
146,860
146,860
Vernon
- 0.83
120
121
121 "
Walnut
0.91
.20.676
29,947
" 29;947
West Covina
0.45
106,766;
107,248
402,248
West Hollywood
0.45
34,698
- 34,853
34,853 -
Westlake Village
0.45
� 8,304
8.341 .
8,3 41.
Whittier
.0.46
85,696.
86;093
.86;093
Unincorporated
-2.09
1,0614526
`1,039,366
44040,390 .
County Total
0.69
.9,879,254.
9;947,906
9;958,091
*Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and,
federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.