Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 June 2, 2017 State Route 91 Advisory" " " Jennifer Harmon (RCTC) AGENDA m OCTA State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting Committee Members Berwin Hanna, RCTC, Chairman Al Murray, OCTA, Vice Chairman Kevin Jeffries, RCTC Bob Magee, RCTC Mark A. Murphy Shawn Nelson, OCTA Tim Shaw, OCTA Karen Spiegel, RCTC Tom Tait, OCTA John Tavaglione, RCTC Adam Rush, RCTC, Alternate Michael Hennessey, OCTA, Alternate Todd Spitzer, OCTA, Alternate Ryan Chamberlain, Caltrans Dist. 12, Ex-Officio John Bulinski, Caltrans Dist. 8, Ex-Officio Ed Graham, SBCTA, Ex-Officio Teleconference Site: Lakeland Village Community Center 16275 Grand Avenue Building D Lake Elsinore, CA, 92530 "� City of Corona -City Hall 400 South Vicentia Avenue Council Chambers -First Floor Corona, California Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. lo)~�lgO\Yl~~ ~ JUN O 1 2017 l~) RIVERSlDE COLJ.NlY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Page 1of4 COMM-SR91AC-00009 AGENDA m OCTA State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in this meeting should contact the OCTA Clerk of the Board, telephone (714) 560-5676, no less than two (2) business days prior to this meeting to enable OCTA to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. Agenda descriptions are intended to give members of the public a general summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The posting of the recommended actions does not indicate what action will be taken. The Committee may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the notice of the recommended action. All documents relative to the items referenced in this agenda are available for public inspection at www.octa.net or through the Clerk of the Board's office at the OCTA Headquarters, 600 South Main Street, Orange, California. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Member Jeffries 1. Public Comments Special Calendar 2. Election of New State Route 91 Advisory Committee Chair 3. Election of New State Route 91 Advisory Committee Vice Chair Consent Calendar (Items 4 and 5) All items on the Consent Calendar are to be approved in one motion unless a Committee Member or a member of the public requests separate action or discussion on a specific item. 4. Approval of Minutes Approval of the minutes of State Route 91 Advisory Committee meeting of December 2, 2016. Page 2of4 • • • " " " m AGENDA State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting OCTA 5. Joint 91 Express Lanes Monthly Status Report Kirk Avila, General Manager, 91 Express Lanes, Orange County Transportation Authority Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, Riverside County Transportation Commission Overview The 91 Express Lanes status report for the month of April 2017 has been prepared for State Route 91 Advisory Committee review. The report highlights operational and financial activities for the both the Orange County Transportation Authority and Riverside County Transportation Commission segments of the 91 Express Lanes. Recommendation Receive and file the 91 Express Lanes Monthly Status Report for the month of April 2017. Regular Calendar 6 . 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Alison Army, Senior Transportation Analyst Orange County Transportation Authority Overview The Orange County Transportation Authority annually prepares a long-range plan for improvements along the State Route 91 corridor between State Route 57 in Orange County and Interstate 15 in Riverside County. The plan includes a listing of potential improvements, preliminary cost estimates, and potential implementation timeframes. These improvements are sponsored by various agencies, including the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the California Department of Transportation. The 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan includes the latest project information and serves as reference for future project development efforts. Recommendation Receive and file as an information item . Page 3 of 4 AGENDA m OCTA State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting Discussion Items 7. 91 Express Lanes -Riverside Operations Report -First Seven Weeks Jennifer Crosson, Toll Operations Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission staff will provide an update on the operating results since March 20, 2017, for the 91 Express Lanes in Riverside County. 8. General Manager's Report -Orange County Transportation Authority 9. General Manager's Report-Riverside County Transportation Commission 10. Committee Members' Reports 11. Closed Session There are no Closed Session items scheduled. 12. Adjournment The next regularly scheduled meeting of this Committee will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, September 8, 2017, at the Orange County Transportation Authority Headquarters, 550 South Main Street, Board Room -Conference Room 07, Orange, California. Page 4of4 • • • 4 . • i - • " " " m OCTA Riverside Coonly Tnmsportotion Commission Committee Members Present Berwin Hanna, RCTC, Chairman Al Murray, OCTA, Vice Chairman Bob Magee, RCTC Karen Spiegel, RCTC Tom Tait, OCTA Kevin Jeffries, RCTC, Alternate (T e/econference) Tim Shaw, OCTA, Alternate John Bulinski, Ca/trans Dist. 8, Ex-Officio Committee Members Absent Ben Benoit, RCTC Michael Hennessey, OCTA Shawn Nelson, OCTA John Tavag/ione, RCTC Jeffrey Lalloway, OCT A, Alternate Todd Spitzer, OCTA Ed Graham, SANBAG, Ex-Officio Ryan Chamberlain, Ca/trans Dist. 12, Ex-Officio Lisa Ramsey for Ryan Chamberlain, Ca/trans District 12, Ex-Officio Call to Order MINUTES State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting Staff Present Darrell Johnson, OCTA, Chief Executive Officer Anne Mayer, RCTC, Executive Director Kirk Avila, OCTA, General Manager, 91 Express Lanes Michael Blomquist, RCTC, Toll Program Director Olga Prado, OCTA, Assistant Clerk of the Board Gina Claridge, OCTA, Deputy Clerk of the Board Haviva Shane, RCTC, Legal Counsel James Donich, OCTA, General Counsel OCTA and RCTC Staff and Members of the General Public The December 2, 2016 regular meeting of the State Route 91 Advisory Committee was called to order by Committee Chairman Hanna at 9:02 a.m. Pledge of Allegiance Member Spiegel led in the Pledge of Allegiance. 1. Public Comments No public comments were received . December 2, 2016 Page 1of7 m OCTA Riverside Cc Special Calend;· 2. Proposed~; A motion by Member present, to calendar. Consent Calenc· MINUTES ~ , Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting ------ Route 91 Advis• Committee Meeting Calendar for 2017 made by Con ;gel, and followin~~ ')pt the 2017 St< (Items 3 thrc' :tee Vice Chairman Murray, seconded oll call vote, declared passed 7-0, by those Route 91 Advisory Committee meeting 3. Approval of iutes Member SpiE public prior tc oulled this item to ·;uire on the policy of releasing minutes to the · minutes being rele :~d to the Committee Members. James Donic Orange County Tra· oortation Authority (OCTA) General Counsel, • responded t~, the release of the ... aft minutes to the public was pursuant to a • California Put ·.: Records Act reques~. Member Sp;•<Jel asked that in the future, the Board be notified when draft minutes are · r.Aeased to the public. A motion W3S made by Committee Vice Chairman Murray, seconded by Member Tait, and following a roll call vote, declared passed 7-0, by those present, to approve the minutes of the December 4, 2015 meeting. 4. Approval of Minutes Member Spiegel pulled this item as part of Item 3 to inquire on the policy of releasing minutes to the public prior to the minutes being released to the Committee Members. Committee Vice Chairman Murray pulled this item to note a minor typo on Page 2 of the minutes, Item 3 (duplicate wording), and requested the correction be made. A motion was made by Committee Vice Chairman Murray, seconded by Member Tait, and following a roll call vote, declared passed 7-0, by those present, to approve the minutes of the March 4, 2016 meeting. December 2, 2016 Page 2 of 7 • " " " m OCTA Riverside Coonty Tronsportotion Commission MINUTES State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting 5. 91 Express Lanes Monthly Status Reports A motion was made by Committee Vice Chairman Murray, seconded by Member Tait, and following a roll call vote, declared passed 7-0, by those present, to receive and file the 91 Express Lanes Monthly Status Reports for the months of November 2015 through September 2016. 6. Fiscal Year 2015-16 91 Express Lanes Annual Financial Statements A motion was made by Committee Vice Chairman Murray, seconded by Member Tait, and following a roll call vote, declared passed 7-0, to by those present, to receive and file the Fiscal Year 2015-16 91 Express Lanes Annual Financial Statements. Regular Calendar There were no Regular Calendar matters . Discussion Items 7. 91 Express Lanes Pavement Rehabilitation and Changeable Message Signs Replacement Project Rose Casey, Director of Highway Programs, provided a PowerPoint presentation as follows: " Project Recap; " Performance Report -By the Numbers; " Summary of Traffic Conditions; " Multimedia Communications Program: " The Road Ahead; " RJ Noble Asphalt Plant in Orange; " Asphalt Rollers -Weekend #1; " Paving Operation -Weekend # 8; " Installing Channelizers (a short video clip was presented as part of this slide); and " Completed Work-Driving Eastbound . December 2, 2016 Page 3of7 Riverside County Transportation Commission MINUTES m OCTA State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting 7. (Continued) A discussion ensued regarding: • Enhancements of new changeable message signs that use LED technology; • Pavement is expected to have a 20-year life; • Staff will return with lessons learned as other projects are looked at; • Thanks to staff for collaborative efforts between the two agencies; • Recognition to staff for improvements on the freeway; and • Make-up dates for postponed work due to weather, and ensuring that OCTA staff notifies the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) if work is postponed in order to announce dates to residents. 8. 91 Project Update David Thomas, RCTC Program Manager, provided an update on the • construction of the 91 corridor improvement project and a PowerPoint • presentation as follows: • Project is Approximately 91 Percent Complete; • Ramp and Local Street Activities and Timing; • Background on the Project Limits; and • Numerous Photos/Images of the Project Were Shown. A discussion ensued regarding: • Opening of the Main Street on-ramp to Interstate 15 (1-15); • Estimated time savings using the Express Lanes in both directions during the peak period; • Amount of people estimated to use the service daily; and • Acknowledgement to staff, the formation of the State Route 91 (SR-91) Advisory Committee, and the diligence of its Members, predecessors, and their vision to see this project come forward. December 2, 2016 Page 4 of 7 • " " " m OCTA Riverside County Tmnsportation Commission MINUTES State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting 9. 91 Express Lanes Operational Readiness Update Jennifer Cross, Toll Operations Manager, RCTC, provided an update on the 91 Express Lanes operational readiness and provided a PowerPoint presentation as follows: " OCTA and RCTC Partnership; " Express Lanes Overview; " Pre-Operations Activity; " Toll Systems; " RCTC In Lane Toll System; " Traffic Operations Center: " Customer Service Center; " On Road Signs; " RCTC Staffing; " Cofiroute Staffing; " Support Contracts; " Commission Adoption; " Full Trip Toll Rates; " Pre-opening Activities; " Marketing Activities; and " 91 Express Lanes (video clip was shown) . A short discussion ensued regarding: " Anticipated level of compliance with the new system; " Difference in pricing for westbound and eastbound toll rates, and level of service (LOS) were discussed (LOS: A, B, C, and D); and " Percentage of people estimated to take the whole route/percentage of people estimated to exit in Corona. 10. Riverside County 1-15 Express Lanes Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, RCTC, provided background information and a PowerPoint presentation related to the planning of the 1-15 Express Lanes project as follows: " " " " Project Features; Project Benefits; Access Points; Median Improvements; December 2, 2016 Page 5 of 7 m OCTA MINUTES Riverside County Transportation Commission State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting 10. (Continued) • Project Schedule; • Project Costs and Funding/Financing; • Toll Features; • RCTC Operations Center; and • Project Contact Information. A discussion ensued regarding: • • • • • • • Funding for project costs; Additional toll lanes being added between SR-91 and the 1-15 (going south) to Cajalco Road; The flyover being worked on (from eastbound SR-91 over to southbound 1-15) will be operational in the next number of months for express lanes traffic; The 91 Express Lanes (both OCTA and RCTC portions) do not use dynamic pricing, but rather "time of day pricing." Hourly toll changes are based on time-day-pricing; Hourly toll changes are based on traffic volumes, and if needed, tolls are changed on a quarterly basis; Dynamic pricing was discussed extensively with the Interstate 405 project, and staff is excited to learn from the 1-15 project; and 1-15 traffic volumes are lower than the SR-91 traffic volumes, therefore, congestions is less. 11. General Manager's Report Kirk Avila, OCTA General Manager of the 91 Express Lanes, reported that: • • • The telephone systems at the administrative offices in Anaheim and the Call Center have been upgraded to match OCTA's current telephone system. OCTA has approximately $110 million dollars of outstanding debt for the 91 Express Lanes, and earlier this week, the ratings from Fitch Ratings where reaffirmed at the A level, and as of today, OCTA has an A rating from Moody's and an AA minus rating from Standard and Poor's. As of November 26, 2016, traffic volumes are down approximately 1 percent, and revenues and revenues are 2.5 percent. The reason for the decrease in traffic volumes compared to the previous years is due to the weekend closures due to the pavement closures; however, we are in line to the projected numbers with respect to projected ridership and revenues. December 2, 2016 Page 6 of 7 • • • " " " m OCTA Rivenlde Coun1y Transportotion Conunission MINUTES State Route 91 Advisory Committee Meeting 12. Committee Members' Reports Committee Vice Chairman Murray thanked Rose Casey, Director of Highway Programs, and staff for their hard work, efforts, an outreach to get the 91 Express Lanes Pavement Rehabilitation project going. Committee Chair Hanna provided remarks on the upcoming Pearl Harbor national holiday on December 7, 2017. Committee Chairman Hanna reported that the City of Norco is proud to celebrate Pearl Harbor Day for the 12th year in a row, which honors all veterans from all services. The event starts at 10:00 a.m., and will take place at the Naval Weapons Station in Norco. He invited everyone to attend. Chairman Hanna adjourned the meeting with a minute of silence in memory of the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, last year. 13. Closed Session A Closed Session was not conducted at this meeting . 14. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 10:06 a.m., and the next regularly scheduled meeting of this Committee will be held at 9:00 a.m. on Friday, March 3, 2016, at: ATTEST City of Corona -City Hall 400 South Vicentia Avenue Council Chambers -First Floor Corona, California Berwin Hanna Committee Chairman December 2, 2016 Olga Prado OCT A Assistant Clerk of the Board Page 7of7 I I I, • , • I ·1--- t-- l L s . " m OCTA " " Rivride Countv Trllll!llOlllllioll Commission June 2, 2017 To: State Route 91 Advisory Committee From:\~~-kKirk Avila, General Manager, OCTA 91 Express Lanes ~ Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, RCTC 91 Express /f 'I Kl Lanes Subject: Joint 91 Express Lanes Monthly Status Report Overview The 91 Express Lanes status report for the month of April 2017 has been prepared for State Route 91 Advisory Committee review. The report highlights operational and financial activities for both the Orange County Transportation Authority and Riverside County Transportation Commission segments of the 91 Express Lanes. Recommendation Receive and file the 91 Express Lanes Monthly Status Report for the month of April 2017. Background The joint monthly status report is prepared to document 91 Express Lanes activity and is provided for State Route 91 Advisory Committee review. Discussion The April 2017 status report for the 91 Express Lanes is provided in Attachment A. For the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) segment, traffic volume in the 91 Express Lanes was 1,294,219, which is an increase of 11.9 percent when compared with the same period last year. Gross potential toll revenue for the month was $3,883,595, which is an increase of 9.2 percent from the prior year's total of $3,557,126. For fiscal year (FY) 2016-17, year-to-date (YTD) traffic volume and gross potential toll revenue as of the end of April 2017 increased when compared to the prior year, Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street I P.O. Box 14184 I Orange I California 92863-1584 I (714) 560-0CTA (6282) Riverside Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor I Riverside I CA 92501 I (951) 787-7141 __ Jo_i_n_t_9_1 _E_x_p_re_s_s_La_n_e_s __ Mo_n_th_1_y_s_ta_t_u_s_R_e_p_o_rt _________ P_a_g_e 2 • with YTD traffic volume increasing by 2. 1 percent and YTD gross potential toll revenue up by 4.6 percent for the OCTA portion. For the Riverside County Transportation Commission segment, traffic volume for the month of April 2017 was 1, 150,634, which exceeded Stantec's projections by 117.2 percent. Gross potential toll revenue was $2,341,030, which exceeded Stantec's projections by 167.5 percent. For FY 2016-17, YTD traffic volume was 1,625,333 and YTD gross potential toll revenue at $3, 176,321. Staff will continue to closely monitor traffic and revenue data and report back to the State Route 91 Advisory Committee regularly. Summary The joint 91 Express Lanes status report for the month of April 2017 is provided for review. The report highlights operational and financial activities. Attachments A. 91 Express Lanes Status Report -As of April 30, 2017 • • " " " m OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission Status Report April 2017 ATTACHMENT A As of April 30, 2017 " Table of Contents Operations Overview OCT A... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Traffic and Revenue Statistics for OCTA... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 OCT A Traffic and Revenue Summary... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 OCT A Eastbound Peak Hours... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OCT A Westbound Peak Hours... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 7 OCTA Operational Highlights................................................. 7 OCTA Financial Highlights.................................................... 8 Operations Overview RCTC................................................. .. 9 Traffic and Revenue Statistics for RCTC.................................. 9 RCTC Traffic and Revenue Summary... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 " RCTC Peak Hours............................................................... 12 " RCTC Eastbound Peak Hours... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 RCTC Westbound Peak Hours............................................... 15 RCTC Operational Highlights... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 RCTC Financial Highlights..................................................... 18 Joint Agency Traffic and Revenue Statistics............................... 19 Joint Agency Performance Measures..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Joint Agency Transponder Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Joint Agency Number of Accounts........................................... 21 Joint Agency E-mail Activity.................................................... 21 A Express l!JLanes 2 " " " OPERATIONS OVERVIEW OCTA TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STATISTICS FOR OCTA Total traffic volume on the OCTA 91 Express Lanes for April 2017 was 1,294,219. This represents a daily average of 43 , 141. This is an 11.9% increase in total traffic volume from the same period last year when traffic levels totaled 1, 156, 17 4. Potential toll revenue for the month was $3 ,883,595 which represents an increase of 9 .2% from the prior year 's total of $3,557, 126. Carpool percentage for the month was 24.02% as compared to the previous year's rate of 22 .02%. Month-to-date traffic and revenue data are summarized in the table below . The following trip and revenue statistics tables represent all trips taken on the 91 Express Lanes and associated potential revenue for the month of April 2017. Current Month-to-Date (MTD) as of April 30, 2017 Trips Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Trips Revenue Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Revenue Average Revenue per Trip Average Full Toll Lanes Average 3+ Lanes Average Gross Revenue A Express l!JLanes Apr-17 MTD Actual 983,334 310,885 1 ,294,219 $3,812,585 $71 ,010 $3,883,595 $3 .88 $0.23 $3.00 Stantec MTD # Projected Variance 935 ,167 48 ,167 281 ,047 29,838 1,216,214 78 ,005 $3,744,164 $68,421 $81 ,575 ($10 ,565) $3,825,740 $57,855 $4.00 ($0 12) $0.29 ($0.06) $3.15 ($0.15) Apr-16 Yr-to-Yr % MTD % Variance Actual Variance 5.2% 901 ,581 9 .1% 10.6 % 254,593 22 .1% 6.4% 1 ,156, 174 11 .9 % 1.8% $3,488 ,677 9 .3% (13 .0 %) $68,449 3 .7% 1 .5% $3 ,557 ,126 9 .2 % (3 .0%) $3.87 0 .3% (20.7%) $0 .27 (14.8%) (4.8%) $3.08 (2 .6 %) 3 The 2017 fiscal year-to-date (YTD) traffic volu me is 2.1 % higher when compared with the same period last year. The 2017 fiscal ye a r-t o-d at e revenue is 4 .6% higher than for the same period last year . Year-to-date av e ra ge revenue per-trip is $3.12. Fiscal year-to-date traffic and revenue d ata a re summarized in the table below . The following trip and revenue statistics ta b le s re p re sent all trips taken on the 91 Express Lanes and associated potential revenu e fo r th e mo nths of July 2016 through April 2017 . FY 2015-16 Year to Date as of Apri l 3 0 , 2 01 7 Trips Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Trips Revenue Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Revenue Average Revenue per Trip Average Full Toll Lanes Average 3+ Lanes Average Gross Revenue A Express l!JLanes FY 2016-17 YTD Actual 9 ,006 ,650 2 ,628 ,459 11 ,635 ,109 $35 ,628 ,887 $683 ,893 $36 ,312 ,780 $3.96 $0 .26 $3 .12 Sta nte c YTD # Projected V a riance 8 ,91 0,49 9 96 ,151 2 ,77 7,46 1 (149,002) 11 ,68 7,96 0 (52 ,851) $35 ,7 94 ,833 ($165 ,946) $823,6 14 ($139 ,721) $36 ,6 18,447 ($305 ,667) $4.02 ($0 .06) $0.30 ($0 .04) $3.13 ($0.01) FY 2015-16 Yr-to-Yr % YTD % Variance Actual Variance 1.1% 8 ,779 ,73 9 2 .6% (5.4 %) 2 ,616 ,656 0 .5% (0 .5%) 11 ,396 ,395 2 .1% (0.5 %) $34 ,027 ,450 4 .7% (17 .0%) $691 ,941 (1 .2%) (0 .8%) $34 ,719 ,391 4 .6 % (1 .5%) $3 .88 2 .1% (13 .3%) $0 .26 0 .0% (0 .3%) $3 .05 2 .3% 4 • • • " " " Traffic and Revenue Summary The chart below reflects the total trips breakdown between Full Toll tr ips and HOV3+ trips for FY 2016-17 on a monthly basis . FY 2016-17 Traffic Volume Overview 1,400,000 1,225 ,000 1,050 ,000 Q) 875,000 E ::I 0 > 700,000 525 ,000 Ju l-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan -17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Month I " Full Toll lanes " 3 " Lanes I The chart below reflects the gross potential revenue breakdown between Full Toll trips and HOV3+ trips for FY 2016-17 on a monthly basis . FY 2016-17 Revenue Summary $4 ,300 ,000 ~-----------------------------------------< $3 ,500,000 $3 .300.000 $3 ,100 ,000 $2 ,900 ,000 $2 .700.000 $2 ,500.000 Ju l-16 A Express J!j Lanes Aug -16 Sep-16 Oct -16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May -17 Jun-17 Month 5 Peak traffic hour in the eastbound directio n re ach ed or exceeded 90% or more of defined capac ity seven times during the month of A pr il 20 17. A s demonstrated on the next chart , westbound peak hour traffic volumes top out at 75% of defined capacity EASTBOUND PEAK-HOUR VOLUME S Monday 04/031 17 PM lime Price HOV Vol. Cap. 1400 -1500 $4.85 312 2,144 63% 1500. 1600 $5 .20 499 2,944 87% 1600 . 1700 $4 50 449 2,886 85% 1700 . 1800 $5.00 461 2,824 83% 1800. 1900 $5.20 563 2,828 83% 1900 . 2000 $3.65 397 1,651 49% Monday 04/10 /17 PM lime Price HOV Vol. Cap . 1400-1500 $4.85 330 2,344 69% 1500-1600 $5 .20 465 2,823 83% 1600-1700 $4.50 447 2,952 87% 1700-1800 $5 .00 445 2,918 86% 1800-1900 $5.20 51 4 2,719 80% 1900-2000 $3.65 354 1,600 47% Monday 04/17/17 PM lime Pr ice HOV Vo l. Cap . 1400-1500 $4 .85 345 2,382 70% 1500-1600 $5 .20 498 2,889 85% 1600-1700 $4 .50 520 3,037 89 % 1700 -1800 $5.00 471 2,944 87% 1800-1900 $5.20 461 2,312 68% 1900 -2000 $3.65 347 1,415 42 % Monday 04/24/17 PM lime Price HOV Vol. Cap. 1400-1500 $4.85 333 2,424 71 % 1500-1600 $5.20 512 3,008 88% 1600-1700 $4 .50 436 2,779 82% 1700 -1800 $5.00 482 3,197 94 % 1800 -1900 $5.20 475 2,346 69% 1900 -2000 $3.65 332 1,353 40% A Express J!jLanes Tuesday Price HOV $4.85 372 $4 .65 484 $635 487 $5.70 474 $370 527 $3.65 539 Tuesday Price HOV $4.85 379 $4 .65 493 $6.35 488 $5.70 532 $3.70 490 $3.65 419 Tuesday Price HOV $4.85 355 $4 .65 480 $6 .35 481 $5.70 513 $370 571 $3.65 413 Tuesday Price HOV $4.8 5 360 $4.65 490 $6 .35 469 $5.70 503 $370 522 $3.65 370 04/04/17 Wed ne sd ay 04/05/17 Vol. Cap . Pri ce HOV Vo l. Cap. 2,521 74% $4 .8 5 391 2,535 75% 2,867 84% $4 .1 5 501 2,911 86% 2,869 84% $7 .60 486 2,846 84% 2,937 86% $7.10 507 2,967 87% 2,866 84% $37 0 520 2,784 82% 2,38 1 70% $3.65 498 2,394 70% 04/11 /17 Wed ne sd ay 04/121 17 Vo l. Cap. Pric e HOV Vol. Cap . 2,612 77% $4 .8 5 395 2,667 78% 3,063 90 % $4 .15 457 2,958 87% 3,012 89% $7 .60 462 2,953 87% 3,088 91% $7.10 479 2,925 86% 2,811 83% $3 .7 0 523 2,854 84% 1,861 55% $3.65 469 2,231 66% 04/18/17 Wedne sd ay 04/19/17 Vo l. Cap . Pr ice HOV Vol. Cap . 2,655 78% $4 .8 5 407 2,693 79% 2,906 85% $4 .1 5 450 2,870 84% 2,862 84 % $76 0 455 2,869 84% 3,141 92% $71 0 525 2,991 88% 3,036 89% $3 .7 0 480 2,965 87% 1,781 52% $36 5 406 1,983 58% 04/2 51 17 Wednesd ay 04/261 17 Vol. Cap . Pric e HOV Vol. Cap . 2,551 75% $4 .8 5 366 2,727 80% 3,123 92% $4 .1 5 470 2,946 87% 2,909 86% $7.60 482 2,889 85% 3,113 92% $7.10 488 3,029 89% 2,814 83% $37 0 534 2,876 85% 1,626 48% $36 5 41 8 2,089 61% Thursday 04/06 /17 Fr iday 04/07/17 Price HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap. $5.00 403 2,761 81% $330 462 3,004 88% $4.90 497 2,976 88% $10.45 56 1 2,891 85% $10 .10 502 2,965 87% $10.25 523 2,973 87% $930 502 2,836 83% $6.60 527 2,976 88% $4.55 557 2,9 54 87% $6 .15 527 2,376 70% $530 502 2,207 65% $5.75 471 1,815 53% Thursday 04/13/17 Fr iday 04/14/17 Price HOV Vol. Cap . Price HOV Vol. Cap . $5.00 437 2,964 87% $330 436 2,948 87% $4.90 517 3,093 91 % $10.45 531 2,800 82% $10.10 516 2,850 84 % $10 .25 499 2,831 83% $930 513 2,821 83% $6 .60 492 2,574 76% $4.55 528 2,960 87% $6.15 412 1,819 54% $530 540 2,541 75% $5.75 393 1,400 41 % Thursday 04/20 /17 Fr iday 04/21/17 Pr ice HOV Vo l. Cap . Price HOV Vol. Cap . $5.00 394 2,827 83% $330 413 3,040 89% $4.90 424 2,781 82% $10.45 534 2,871 84% $10.10 500 3,004 88% $10 .25 419 2,372 70% $930 50 1 3,040 89% $6.60 492 2,853 84 % $4.55 570 3,032 89% $6.15 550 2,542 75% $530 526 2,496 73% $5.75 384 1,726 51 % Thursday 04/27/17 Fr iday 04/28/17 Price HOV Vol. Cap . Price HOV Vol. Cap . $5.00 388 2,743 81% $3.30 471 2,9 46 87% $4.90 487 2,998 88% $10.45 592 2,908 86% $10.10 458 2,892 85% $10 .25 504 2,867 84% $930 504 2,971 87% $660 520 2,951 87% $4.55 556 2,988 88% $6.15 494 2,445 72"/o $530 438 2,0 36 60% $5.75 444 1,781 52% 6 • • • " " " WESTBOUND PEAK-HOUR VOLUMES Monday 04 /03/17 Tuesday 04 /04 /17 Wednesday 04/05/17 Thu rsday 04/06 /17 Fri day 04 /07/17 AM nme Price HOV Vol . Cap . Price HOV Vol . Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap . 0400-0500 $2 .90 538 1,884 55 % $2 .90 555 1,876 55 % $2 .90 583 1,858 55 % $2 .90 553 1,807 53% $2 .90 469 1,539 45 % 0500-0600 $4 .65 593 2,320 68 % $4 .65 680 2,470 73 % $4 .65 630 2,399 71% $4 .65 670 2,413 71% $4.40 591 2, 186 64 % 0600 -0700 $4 .85 461 1,873 55% $4 .85 466 1,810 53% $4 .85 499 1,896 56 % $4 .85 451 1,884 55 % $4 .65 436 1,657 49 % 0700 -0800 $5 .35 385 1,771 52% $5 .35 368 1,710 50% $5 .35 380 1,831 54% $5 .35 388 1,7 33 51% $5 .20 375 1,639 48 % 0800 -0900 $4 .85 263 1,653 49 % $4 .85 255 1,780 52 % $4 .85 294 1,715 50 % $4 .85 289 1,744 51 % $4 .65 273 1,520 45 % 0900 -1000 $3.80 266 1,764 52 % $3.80 306 1,947 57 % $3.80 358 2,048 60 % $3.80 321 2,006 59 % $3.80 242 1,506 44 % Monday 04 /10/17 Tuesday 04/11/17 Wednesday 04 /12/17 Thursday 04 /13/17 Friday 04/14/17 AM nme Price HOV Vol . Cap . Pr ice HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap . Price HOV Vol. Cap . Price HOV Vol. Cap. 0400 -0500 $2 .90 517 1,847 54% $2 .90 535 1,857 55% $2 .90 538 1,880 55 % $2 .90 532 1,832 54 % $2 .90 390 1,316 39 % 0500 -0600 $4 .65 609 2,391 70% $4 .65 518 2,082 61 % $4 .65 625 2,387 70 % $4 .65 605 2,411 71 % $4.40 537 2,061 61 % 0600-0700 $4 .85 457 1,851 54 % $4 .85 490 1,979 58 % $4 .85 435 1,871 55 % $4 .85 479 1,812 53 % $4 .65 373 1,439 42 % 0700 -0800 $5 .35 328 1,625 48 % $5 .35 379 1,922 57% $5 .35 352 1,840 54 % $5 .35 321 1,687 50 % $5 .20 271 1,305 38 % 0800 -0900 $4 .85 241 1,714 50% $4 .85 262 1,884 55% $4 .85 244 1,981 58% $4 .85 231 1,633 48% $4 .65 200 1,16 1 34% 0900-1000 $3.80 267 1,7 83 52 % $380 262 1,958 58 % $3 80 294 1,998 59% $3.80 291 1,882 55 % $3.80 235 1,372 40 % Monday 04 /17117 Tuesday 04/18/17 Wednesday 04 /19/17 Thursday 04 /20/17 Friday 04/21/17 AM nme Price HOV Vol. Cap . Pr ice HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap . Price HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap. 0400 -0500 $2 .90 531 1,996 59 % $2 .90 560 2,106 62 % $2 .90 555 1,996 59 % $2 .90 552 1,7 91 53 % $2 .90 475 1,662 49 % 0500 -0600 $4 .65 639 2,460 72 % $4 .65 619 2,551 75% $4 .65 657 2,395 70 % $4 .65 620 2,428 71 % $4.40 562 2, 163 64 % 0600 -0700 $4 .85 446 1,883 55% $4 .85 493 1,910 56% $4 .85 472 1,873 55% $4 .85 497 1,808 53% $4 .65 426 1,654 49 % 0700 -0800 $5 .35 352 1,775 52 % $5 .35 359 1,865 55 % $5 .35 360 1,78 1 52% $5 .35 380 1,861 55 % $5 .20 350 1,570 46 % 0800 -0900 $4 .85 292 1,778 52 % $4 .85 280 1,942 57 % $4 .85 262 1,708 50 % $4 .85 267 1,810 53 % $4 .65 231 1,458 43 % 0900 -1000 $3.80 326 1,926 57% $3.80 295 2,051 60% $3.80 260 1,861 55% $3.80 273 1,934 57% $3 .80 218 1,355 40% Monday 04 /24/17 Tuesday 04/25/17 Wednesday 04 /26 /17 Thursday 04 /27/17 Friday 04/28 /17 AM nme Price HOV Vol. Cap. Pri ce HOV Vol. Cap. Pr ice HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol. Cap. Price HOV Vol . Cap . 0400-0500 $2 .90 562 2,039 60% $2 .90 566 1,974 58 % $2 .90 542 1,84 7 54% $2 .90 591 1,914 56% $2 .90 507 1,653 49 % 0500-0600 $4 .65 623 2,409 71% $4 .65 653 2,420 71 % $4 .65 667 2,414 71% $4 .65 656 2,375 70 % $4.4 0 577 2,209 65 % 0600-0700 $4 .85 524 1,955 58% $4 .85 465 1,895 56 % $4 .85 513 1,910 56% $4 .85 513 1,963 58 % $4 .65 465 1,671 49 % 0700 -0800 $5 .35 389 1,850 54% $5 .35 392 1,901 56% $5 .35 400 1,880 55% $5 .35 364 1,835 54% $5 .20 368 1,585 47% 0800-0900 $4 .85 297 1,910 56 % $4 .85 258 1,786 53 % $4 .85 256 1,7 99 53 % $4 .85 280 1,846 54 % $4 .65 252 1,689 50% 0900-1000 $3.80 271 1,875 55 % $3 .80 234 1,837 54 % $3 .80 236 1,805 53 % $3.80 252 1,882 55 % $3.80 253 1,539 45 % OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS On-road Operations OCTA Customer Assistance Specialists (CAS) responded to 119 calls during the month of April. Of those calls , 74 were to assist disabled vehicles , 9 calls to remove debris , and 18 assists or traffic breaks . There were 12 accidents in the Express Lanes and 6 accidents originating in the SR91 general-purpose lanes that affected the Express Lanes. A Express l!JLanes 7 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS O CT A 91 Express Lanes Operating Statement YTD as of: 4/30/2017 YTD Variance Description A ctu al (11 Budget (11 Dollar$ Operating revenues: Toll revenue $ 3 3 ,4 7 1 ,973 .56 $ 29,668,672.00 $ 3 ,803,301 .56 Fee revenue 10 ,3 72 , 161 .2 6 5 ,990,863.00 4 ,381 ,298.26 Total operating revenues 4 3 ,844, 134.82 35,659,535.00 8 , 184,599.82 Operating expenses: Contracted services 6 ,2 14,641 .94 7 ,507,954.00 1 ,293,312.06 Administrative fee 2 ,2 8 6,009 .54 1,996, 760.00 (289,249.54) Other professional services 6 0 1,01 5 .76 941 ,790.00 340,774.24 Credit card processing fees 6 76 ,656 .5 9 ' 548 ,017.00 (128,639.59) Toll road account servicing 1 ,1 9 9 ,072 .0 8 760,635.00 (438,437.08) Other insurance expense 2 7 0,41 3 .48 624,750.00 354,336.52 Toll road maintenance supply repairs 1 1 , 19 2 ,544.47 16,677,420.00 5,484,875.53 Patrol services 6 6 1 ,889 .5 1 499,800.00 (162 ,089.51) Building equipment repairs and maint 177,296 .8 6 512,827.00 335,530.1 4 Other services 6 , 153 .00 15,725.00 9 ,572.00 Utilities 3 3 ,71 8 .5 8 30,265.00 (3,453.58) Office expense 44,723 .23 66,001 .00 21 ,277.77 Bad debt expense 15 1,902 .60 -(151,902.60) Miscellaneous (2 ) 8 8,937 .7 8 102,374.00 13,436.22 Leases 3 5 5 ,883 .1 7 240,600.00 (115,283.17) Total operating expenses 2 3 ,96 0 ,858 .59 30,524,918.00 6 ,564,059.41 Depreciation and amortization (3l 2 ,6 0 0,460 .8 9 -(2,600,460.89) Operating income (loss) 17 ,2 8 2,81 5 .34 5 ,134,617.00 12, 148, 198.34 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Reimbursement from Other Agencies 10 1,059 .39 150,000.00 (48,940 61) Interest income 1 ,046,398.63 .. 802,638.00 243,760.63 .. 59,820.28 ~ Interest expense (4,5 54,299 . 72) (4,614, 120.00) Other 12 3,667 .24 -123,667.24 Total nonoperatinq revenues (expenses) (3 ,2 8 3, 174 .46) (3,661,482.00) 378,307.54 Transfers in --- Transfers out -(8,300,000.00) 8 ,300,000.00 Net income (loss) $ 1 3 ,9 99,640.88 $ (6,826,865.00) $20,826,505.88 ,Actual amounts are accounted for on the accrual basi s o f a cco u nting in a n e nterprise fund. Budget amounts are accounted for on a modified accrual basis of accounting . 'Miscellaneous expenses include: Bond Insurance Costs , B an k Ser\ice Charge , Transponder Materials . 'Depreciation and amortization are not budgeted items . Capital Asset Activity Percent(%) 12.8 73.1 23.0 17.2 (14.5) 36.2 (23.5) (57.6) 56.7 32.9 (32.4) 65.4 60.9 (11.4) 32.2 NIA 13.1 (47.9) 21 .5 NIA 236.6 (32.6) 30.4 1 .3 NIA 10.3 NIA 100.0 (305.1) During the ten months ending April 30 , 201 7 , c apit a l a sset activities included $971 ,974 for the purchase of communication equipment and $306,34 3 t owards the purchase of transponders . A Express l!.i Lanes 8 • • • " " " OPERATIONS OVERVIEW RCTC TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STATISTICS FOR RCTC Total traffic volume on the 91 Express Lanes for April 2017 was 1, 150 ,634 . This represents a daily average of 38 ,354 , which exceeded Stantec's projections by 117 .2%. Potential toll revenue for the month was $2 ,341 ,030 , which exceeded Stantec projections by 167.5%. Carpool percentage for the month was 19 .06%. Month-to-date traffic and revenue data are summarized in the table below . The following trip and revenue statistics tables represent all trips taken on the 91 Express Lanes and associated potential revenue for the month of April 2017. Current Month-to-Date (MTD) as of April 30, 2017 Trips Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Tri ps Revenue Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Revenue Average Revenue per Trip Average Full Toll Lanes Average 3+ Lanes Average Gross Revenue A Express l!JLanes Apr-17 Stantec MTD MTD Actual Projected 931 ,356 394 ,499 219 ,2 7 8 1 35 ,286 1 , 150,634 5 2 9 ,785 $2 ,324 , 184 $87 5 ,285 $16 ,846 $0 $2 ,341 ,030 $87 5 ,2 85 $2 .50 $2 .22 $0 .08 $0 .00 $2 .03 $1 .65 # O/o Variance Variance 536 ,857 136.1 % 83 ,992 62 .1 % 620 ,849 117.2 % $1,448 ,898 165.5 % $16 ,846 $1,465 ,745 167.5 % $0 .28 1 2 .6 % $0 .08 $0 .38 23.0% 9 Fiscal year-to-date traffic and revenue data are summarized in the table below. The following trip and revenue statistics ta ble s re pre sent all trips taken on the 91 Express Lanes and associated potential revenu e fo r th e pe riod between March 20 , 2017 (opening date) through April 2017. FY 2015-16 Year to Date as of Apri l 3 0, 2 01 7 Trips Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Trips Revenue Full Toll Lanes 3+ Lanes Total Gross Revenue Average Revenue per Trip Average Full Toll Lanes Average 3+ Lanes Average Gross Revenue A.Express l!JLanes FY 201 6 -1 7 Stantec YT D YTD Actu a l P r ojected 1 ,3 3 0, 1 54 522 ,828 2 9 5, 1 7 9 177,486 1 ,6 2 5,3 3 3 700 ,314 $3 , 1 5 4 ,2 1 9 $1 ,171 ,914 $2 2 , 102 $0 $3 , 1 7 6 ,3 2 1 $1,171 ,914 $2.3 7 $2 .24 $0 .0 7 $0 .00 $1.9 5 $1 .67 # % Variance Variance 807 ,326 154.4% 117,693 66.3% 925 ,019 132.1% $1 ,982 ,305 169.2% $22 , 102 $2 ,004,407 171 .0% $0.13 5.8% $0.07 $0.28 16.8 % 10 • • • " " " RCTC Traffic and Revenue Summary The chart below reflects the total trips breakdown between Full Toll trips and HOV3+ trips for FY 2016-17 on a monthly basis . FY 2016-17 Traffic Volume Overview 1,400 ,000 1,225 ,000 1,050 ,000 <II 875 ,000 E ;:) 0 700 ,000 > 525 ,000 350 ,000 175 ,000 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Month " Full Toll Lanes " 3+ Lanes The chart below reflects the gross potential revenue breakdown between Full Toll trips and HOV3+ trips for FY 2016-17 on a monthly basis. $2 ,500 ,000 $2 ,300 ,000 t--------- $2 ,100 ,000 t--------- $1,900 ,000 1--------- 4>$1,700 ,000 t--------- :::1 ;$1 ,500 ,000 1--------- > ~$1 ,3 00 ,000 1--------- $1 ,100 ,000 t--------- $900 ,000 t-----t':.i" " $700 ,000 " $500 ,000 Mar-17 FY 2016-17 Revenue Summary Apr-17 May -17 Month " Full Toll Lanes " 3+ Lanes A Express l!.1 Lanes Jun -17 11 PEAK-HOUR VOLUMES Peak t raffic vo l umes exceeded projected vo lu mes for t he hours highl ighted in ye ll ow on the follow ing charts. The opening day toll policy p rovi des fo r a toll rate based on level of service (LOS) volumes . The projected open ing da y LO S vo lu mes were exceeded for many hours as depicted in the yellow h ighlight. Peak period e ast bou nd tolls were increased regularly to address congestion at the 1-15/SR-91 spl it. O n May 81h tolls were adjusted for westbound and eastbound non-peak hours where the LOS w as ex ce ed at least four times duri ng the first six weeks of operation . Volumes will con t inue to be moni t o red and tolls will be adjusted as necessary when volumes 1,564 vehicles as d efin e d i n the long-term toll policy . A Express l!JLanes 12 • • • ~ ~~ ii UI tn ..... w tn • Eastbound Peak-hour Volume Eastbound PM Peak -County Line to McKinley Sunday 03/26117 Monday 03/27117 PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 1400. 1500 1500. 1600 1600. 1700 1700. 1800 1800. 1900 1900. 2000 Sunday 04102/17 Monday 04/03/17 PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS 1400. 1500 $1 40 196 556 752 B $1 40 156 1,070 1,226 0 1500 -1600 $1 40 148 470 618 B $3 85 216 932 1,148 c 1600 -1700 $1 40 207 538 745 B $3 85 169 861 1,030 c 1700 -1800 $140 181 453 634 B $3.85 188 832 1,020 c 1800 -1900 $1 40 185 377 562 B $3 85 230 919 1,149 c 1900 -2000 $1 40 217 430 647 B $2 10 169 687 856 c Sunday 04/09/17 Monday 04/10!17 PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 1400 -1500 $1 40 158 361 519 B $1 40 142 1,141 1,283 D 1500 -1600 $1 40 197 446 643 B $385 211 882 1,093 c 1600 -1700 $1 40 230 461 691 B $385 180 967 1,147 c 1700 -1800 $1 40 224 495 719 B $3 85 185 900 1,085 c 1800 -1900 $1 40 181 421 602 B $3 85 227 936 1,163 c 1900 -2000 $1 40 191 341 532 B $2 10 134 612 746 B Sunday 04116117 Monday 04/17117 PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 1400 -1500 $1.40 352 930 1,282 D $1 40 151 1,136 1,287 D 1500 -1600 $1 40 235 684 919 c $3 85 263 974 1,237 D 1600 -1700 $1 40 262 489 751 B $3 85 230 980 1,210 D 1700 -1800 $1 40 274 453 727 B $385 185 903 1,088 c 1800 -1900 $1.40 362 526 888 c $3.85 181 755 936 c 1900 -2000 $1 40 464 575 1,039 c $2.10 129 517 646 B Sunday 04/23117 Monday 04/24117 PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 1400 -1500 $1 40 178 572 750 B $1 40 178 1,127 1,305 D 1500 -1600 $1 40 178 488 666 B $3 85 231 1,004 1,235 D 1600 -1700 $1 40 206 472 678 B $3 85 183 939 1, 122 c 1700 -1800 $1 40 190 491 681 B $3 85 182 981 1, 163 c 1800 -1900 $1 40 227 407 634 B $3 85 198 714 912 c 1900 -2000 $1 40 203 388 591 B $2 10 123 408 531 B Sunday 04/30117 Monday 05101117 PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 1400-1500 $1 40 157 436 593 B 1500-1600 $1.40 195 440 635 B 1600 -1700 $1.40 217 472 689 B 1700 -1800 $1 40 202 389 591 B 1800 -1900 $1 40 188 367 555 B 1900 -2000 $1 40 225 371 596 B • Tuesday 03128117 Wednesday 03129/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS Tuesday 04104/17 Wednesday 04/05/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS $1 40 159 1,107 1,266 D $1 40 225 1,215 1,440 E $3 85 239 1,062 1,301 D $3 85 258 981 1,239 D $3 85 209 1,014 1,223 D $3 85 200 1,117 1,317 D $3 85 194 999 1,193 c $3 85 220 1,108 1,328 0 $3.85 207 892 1,099 c $3.85 237 957 1,194 c $2 10 232 852 1,084 c $2 10 210 904 1,114 c Tuesday 04111/17 Wednesday 04/12/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1 40 175 1,231 1,406 E $1 40 179 1,301 1.480 E $3 85 211 1,034 1,245 D $4_95 231 1,005 1,236 0 $3 85 191 1,057 1,248 D $4.95 185 1,075 1,260 0 $3 85 188 965 1,153 c $4_95 197 1,095 1,292 D $385 190 970 1,160 c $4.95 218 959 1,177 c $2 10 161 680 841 c $2 10 185 866 1,051 c Tuesday 04118117 Wednesday 04/19117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1 40 182 1,162 1,344 D $1 40 207 1,300 1,507 E $3 85 218 1,025 1.243 D $4.95 229 1,044 1,273 D $3 85 201 1,021 1,222 D $4.95 202 1,006 1,208 D $3.85 197 969 1,166 c $4.95 221 1,028 1,249 D $3 85 221 1,013 1,234 D $4.95 215 951 1,166 c $2 10 173 695 668 c $2 10 183 752 935 c Tuesday 04125117 Wednesday 04126117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1 40 169 1,084 1,253 D $6 40 182 979 1,161 c $3 85 232 1,110 1.342 D $6.40 224 1,045 1,269 D $3 85 177 947 1,124 c $6.40 193 1,075 1,268 D $3 85 168 965 1,133 c $4 95 199 1,002 1,201 D $3 85 212 884 1,096 c $4 95 225 894 1,119 c $2 10 132 561 693 B $2 10 167 829 996 c Tuesday 05102117 Wednesday 05103111 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Thursday 03/30/17 Friday Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price Thursday 04/06/17 Friday Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS Price $4 95 207 1,220 1,427 E $6.40 $6.40 244 1,104 1,348 0 $640 $6 40 200 1,008 1,208 0 $6.40 $4 95 242 1,066 1,308 D $4.95 $4.95 264 1,026 1,290 D $4 95 $2 10 213 797 1,010 c $2 10 Thursday 04/13117 Friday Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price $6 40 174 1,252 1,426 E $8.40 $7 40 243 1,022 1,265 D $7.40 $7 40 231 1,011 1,242 D $7.40 $6 40 240 1,070 1,310 D $6.40 $4 95 246 1,122 1,368 0 $4 95 $2 10 245 1,075 1,320 D $2.10 Thursday 04/20117 Friday Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price $7.40 197 1,086 1,283 D $10_40 $9 40 218 836 1,054 c $9_40 $7 40 207 1,077 1,284 D $8.40 $6 40 242 1,163 1,405 E $6.40 $6.40 275 1,060 1,335 D $4.95 $2 10 217 994 1,211 D $2 10 Thursday 04/27117 Friday Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price $7 40 177 1,093 1,270 D $10.40 $9 40 235 1,052 1,287 D $10.40 $8 40 208 1,020 1,228 D $840 $7 40 235 1,011 1,246 D $7.40 $7 40 235 971 1, 193 c $4.95 $2 10 235 879 1,049 c $2 10 Thursday 05104117 Friday Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price 03/31117 HOV SOV Vol. LOS 04107111 HOV SOV Vol. LOS 224 1,238 1,462 E 298 1,358 1,656 F 216 1,155 1,371 D 240 1,076 1,316 D 285 1,004 1,289 D 205 784 989 c 04114117 HOV SOV Vol. LOS 244 1,371 1,615 F 401 2,254 2,655 F 237 1,355 1,592 F 234 1,034 1,268 D 201 774 975 c 150 477 627 B 04121117 HOV SOV Vol. LOS 192 1,111 1,303 D 283 1,144 1,427 E 206 1,069 1,275 D 208 996 1,204 D 285 1,067 1,352 D 165 792 957 c 04128/17 HOV SOV Vol. LOS 205 1,112 1,317 D 298 1,090 1,388 D 233 1,136 1,369 D 201 1,003 1,204 D 212 935 1,147 c 212 761 973 c 05105/17 HOV SOV Vol. LOS Saturday Price HOV SOV $1_40 220 988 $1 40 226 893 $1 40 246 873 $1 40 244 763 $1 40 223 663 $1 40 200 466 Saturday Price HOV SOY $1 40 223 923 $1 40 239 866 $1 40 254 744 $1 40 222 698 $1 40 246 713 $1 40 213 545 Saturday Price HOV SOV $1 40 216 808 $1 40 245 760 $1 40 236 805 $1 40 203 693 $1 40 236 489 $1 40 171 373 Saturday Price HOV SOV • 04/01117 Vol. LOS 1,208 D 1,119 c 1,119 c 1,007 c 886 c 666 B 04/08/17 Vol. LOS 1,146 c 1,105 c 998 c 920 c 959 c 758 B 04115/17 Vol. LOS 1,024 c 1,005 c 1,041 c 896 c 725 B 544 B 04/22117 Vol. LOS m )> CJ) ~ OJ 0 c z c ""'O m )> " I :c 0 c ::0 < 0 r c s: m CJ) $1 40 281 1,006 1,287 D $1 40 263 999 1,262 D $1 40 256 941 1,197 c $1 40 172 710 882 c $1 40 279 752 1,031 c $1 40 218 559 777 B Saturday 04/29117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1 40 223 973 1, 196 c $1 40 264 863 1,127 c $1 40 249 851 1, 100 c $1 40 206 669 875 c $1 40 258 799 1,055 c $1 40 177 580 757 B Saturday 05106/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS ~ ~~ i"a UI~ f-' -+=' UI ., Eastbound PM Peak ·County Line to 1-16 South Sunday 03126117 Monday PM llme Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV 1400 -1500 1500 -1600 1600 -1700 1700 -1800 1800 -1900 1900 -2000 Sunday 04102117 Monday PM lime Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOY 1400 -1500 $1.80 131 302 433 B $1.80 67 615 1500 -1600 $1.80 111 269 380 A $2.75 85 537 1600 -1700 $1.80 136 283 419 B $2.75 89 517 1700 -1800 $1.80 143 259 402 B $2.75 80 506 1800 -1900 $1.80 113 199 312 A $2.75 103 489 1900 -2000 $1.80 158 211 369 A $2.75 96 337 Sunday 04109117 Monday PM lime Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov 1400 -1500 $1.80 120 216 336 A $1.80 84 647 1500 -1600 $1.80 99 248 347 A $2.75 87 510 1600 -1700 $1 80 128 274 402 B $2.75 84 570 1700 -1800 $1.80 134 243 377 A $2.75 88 549 1800 -1900 $1.80 109 177 286 A $2.75 100 479 1900 -2000 $1.80 124 188 312 A $2.75 75 366 Sunday 04116117 Monday PM lime Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV 1400 -1500 $1.80 182 395 577 B $1.80 81 633 1500 -1600 $1.80 171 300 471 B $2.75 107 571 1600 -1700 $1.80 213 310 523 B $2.75 111 560 1700 -1800 $1.80 208 257 465 B $2.75 93 522 1800 -1900 $1.80 231 254 485 B $2.75 87 387 1900 -2000 $1.80 366 347 713 B $2.75 78 298 Sunday 04123117 Monday PM lime Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV 1400 -1500 $1.80 134 285 419 B $1.80 77 658 1500 -1600 $1.80 129 262 391 A $2.75 107 599 1600 -1700 $1.80 121 232 353 A $2.75 80 575 1700 -1800 $1.80 152 256 408 B $2.75 98 544 1800. 1900 $1.80 124 189 313 A $2.75 71 459 1900 -2000 $1.80 142 187 329 A $2.75 66 241 Sunday 04130117 Monday PM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV 1400 -1500 $1.80 112 246 358 A 1500 -1600 $1.80 130 226 356 A 1600 -1700 $1.80 142 274 416 B 1700 -1800 $1.80 122 206 328 A 1800 -1900 $1.80 140 191 331 A 1900 -2000 $1.80 131 185 316 A 03127117 Tuesday 03128117 Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS 04103117 Tuesday 04104117 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 682 B $1.80 91 625 716 B 622 B $2.75 103 589 692 B 606 B $2.75 100 653 753 B 586 B $2.75 86 556 642 B 592 B $2.75 100 512 612 B 433 B $2.75 111 500 611 B 04110117 Tuesday 04111117 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 731 B $1.80 98 722 820 c 597 B $2.75 111 611 722 B 654 B $2.75 83 601 684 B 637 B $2.75 89 558 647 B 579 B $2.75 88 499 587 B 441 B $2.75 103 415 518 B 04117117 Tuesday 04/18117 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 714 B $1.80 71 746 817 c 678 B $2.75 96 627 723 B 671 B $2.75 108 583 691 B 615 B $2.75 92 601 693 B 474 B $2.75 101 624 725 B 376 A $2.75 97 389 486 B 041-24117 Tuesday 04125117 Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS 735 B $1.80 78 686 764 B 706 B $2.75 96 659 755 B 655 B $2.75 88 553 641 B 642 B $2.75 86 563 649 B 530 B $2.75 98 530 628 B 307 A $2.75 76 356 432 B 05101117 Tuesday 05102117 Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Wednesday 03129117 Thursday 03/30117 Friday 03131117 Saturday 04/01117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 122 470 592 B $1.80 135 442 577 B $1.80 134 450 584 B $1.80 139 414 553 B $1.80 137 368 505 B $1.80 124 251 375 A Wednesday 04105117 Thursday 04106117 Friday 04/07117 Saturday 04/08117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.80 87 702 789 B $2.75 76 724 800 B $2.75 93 682 775 B $1.80 118 417 535 B $2.75 88 683 771 B $4.95 96 643 739 B $4.95 110 555 665 B $1.80 127 401 528 B $2.75 93 550 643 B $2.75 98 569 667 B $2.75 93 464 557 B $1.80 147 379 526 B $2.75 105 600 705 B $2.75 106 651 757 B $2.75 92 554 646 B $1.80 119 391 510 B $2.75 98 538 636 B $2.75 91 504 595 B $2.75 130 536 666 B $1.80 126 364 490 B $2.75 123 503 626 B $2.75 100 456 556 B $2.75 98 408 506 B $1.80 141 300 441 B Wednesday 04112117 Thursday 04/13117 Friday 04114117 Saturday 04115117 Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 121 752 873 c $2.75 88 744 832 c $2.75 96 555 651 B $1.80 143 458 601 B $2.75 87 689 776 B $4.95 100 685 785 B $4.95 77 207 284 A $1.80 155 434 589 B $2.75 82 568 650 B $2.75 89 492 581 B $2 75 91 333 424 B $1 80 167 403 570 B $2.75 110 620 730 B $2.75 122 619 741 B $2.75 105 520 625 B $1.80 117 338 455 B $2.75 121 521 642 B $2.75 109 580 689 B $2.75 123 380 503 B $1.80 117 257 374 A $2.75 110 462 572 B $2.75 99 528 627 B $2.75 114 253 367 A $1.80 125 214 339 A Wednesday 04119117 Thursday 04120117 Friday 04121117 Saturday 04122117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.80 79 737 816 c $2.75 93 762 855 c S2.75 94 741 835 c $1.80 123 480 603 B $2.75 95 647 742 B $4.95 74 511 585 B $4.95 107 672 779 B $1.80 141 464 605 B $2.75 74 591 665 B $2.75 102 647 749 B $2.75 88 515 603 B $1.80 155 436 591 B $2.75 113 679 792 B $2.75 112 773 885 c $2.75 90 576 666 B $1.80 102 356 458 B $2.75 97 703 800 B $2.75 97 614 711 B $2.75 115 611 726 B $1.80 160 409 569 B $2.75 97 495 592 B $2.75 111 583 694 B $2.75 88 397 485 B $1.80 144 300 444 B Wednesday 04126117 Thursday 04127117 Friday 04128117 Saturday 04129117 Price HOV SOY Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.80 86 691 777 B $2.75 95 722 817 c $4.95 95 602 697 B $1.80 109 388 497 B $2.75 94 658 752 B $4.95 77 605 682 B $4.95 118 600 718 B $1.80 136 475 611 B $2.75 98 609 707 B $2.75 80 558 638 B $2.75 104 529 633 B $1.80 130 464 594 B $2.75 96 563 659 B $2.75 94 555 649 B $2.75 98 510 608 B $1.80 118 311 429 B $2.75 107 578 685 B $2.75 90 567 657 B $2.75 95 439 534 B $1.80 138 350 488 B $2.75 103 427 530 B $2.75 88 440 528 B $2.75 98 391 489 B $1.80 124 288 412 B Wednesday 05103117 Thursday 05104117 Friday 05105117 Saturday 05106117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS • • " " ?" J I Westbound Peak-hour Volume ---------- - - -ii vim f-' V1 llt AM Time 0400 -0500 0500. 0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800. 0900 0900 -1000 AM Time 0400. 0500 0500. 0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800 -0900 0900 -1000 AM Time 0400. 0500 0500. 0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800. 0900 0900. 1000 AM Time 0400. 0500 0500. 0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800. 0900 0900. 1000 AM Time 0400. 0500 0500 -0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800 -0900 0900 -1000 AM Time 0400. 0500 0500. 0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800. 0900 0900. 1000 Sunday Price HOV SOV Sunday Price HOV SOV $1.40 4 7 $1.40 2 3 $1.40 5 39 $1.40 4 18 $1.40 4 10 $1.40 8 14 Sunday Price HOV SOV $1.40 10 14 $1.40 11 32 $1.40 19 61 $1.40 42 109 $1.40 97 176 $1.40 151 307 Sunday Price HOV SOV $1.40 14 14 $1.40 12 23 $1.40 16 31 $1.40 40 82 $1.40 105 123 $1.40 182 283 Sunday Price HOV sov $1.40 16 15 $1.40 1 6 $1.40 0 0 $1.40 1 6 $1.40 3 1 $1.40 1 0 Sunday Price HOV SOV $1.40 14 19 $1.40 15 36 $1.40 42 86 $1.40 68 129 $1.40 114 209 $1.40 185 357 03/26117 Monday 03/27/17 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 04/02/17 Monday 04/03/17 Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS 11 A $1.40 224 755 979 c 5 A $3.85 322 1,480 1.802 F 44 A $4.95 285 1,392 1,677 F 22 A $4.95 239 1,505 1,744 F 14 A $3.85 161 1,150 1.311 0 22 A $2.10 129 753 882 c 04/09/17 Monday 04110/17 Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS 24 A $1.40 233 842 1,075" c 43 A $3.85 373 1,591 1,964 F 80 A $4.95 289 1,458 1.747 F 151 A $4.95 199 1,446 1,645 F 273 A $3.85 127 1,376 1.503 E 458 B $2.10 104 864 968 c 04/16117 Monday 04/17117 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 28 A $1.40 215 838 1,053 c 35 A $3.85 371 1,529 1,900 F 47 A $4.95 298 1.399 1.697 F 122 A $4.95 200 1,606 1,806 F 228 A $3.85 174 1,395 1,569 F 465 B $2.10 168 1,016 1,184 c 04/23117 Monday 04/24/17 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 31 A $1.40 228 874 1.102 c 7 A $3.85 352 1,486 1,838 F 0 A $4.95 316 1,255 1,571 F 7 A $4.95 204 1,442 1,646 F 4 A $3.85 185 1,561 1,746 F 1 A $2.10 119 1,043 1,162 c 04/30117 Monday 05/01/17 Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 33 A 51 A 128 A 197 A 323 A 542 B Tuesday 03/28/17 Wednesday 03/29117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Tuesday 04/04117 Wednesday 04/05/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.40 243 815 1,058 c $1.40 243 793 1,036 c $3.85 376 1,550 1,926 F $3.85 348 1,468 1.816 F $4.95 288 1,468 1,756 F 54.95 320 1,370 1,690 F $4.95 260 1,457 1,717 F $4.95 262 1,505 1,767 F $3.85 156 1.249 1.405 E $3.85 176 1.233 1.409 E $2.10 148 912 1,060 c $2.10 188 816 1,004 c Tuesday 04111117 Wednesday 04/12/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.40 233 779 1,012 c S1.40 244 823 1,067 c $385 255 993 1,248 0 $3.85 351 1,423 1,774 F $4.95 263 1,263 1,526 E $4.95 253 1,306 1,559 E $4.95 260 1,717 1,977 F $4.95 251 1,632 1,883 F $3.85 139 1.399 1,538 E $3.85 150 1,358 1,508 E $2.10 107 936 1.043 c $2.10 119 967 1,086 c Tuesday 04/18/17 Wednesday 04/19117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.40 253 819 1,072 c $1.40 241 866 1,107 c $3.85 330 1.361 1.691 F $3.85 353 1.408 1,761 F $4.95 296 1,314 1,610 F $4.95 289 1,350 1.639 F $4.95 228 1,750 1.978 F $4.95 220 1,580 1,800 F $3.85 178 1.510 1,688 F $3.85 140 1.294 1,434 E $2.10 128 983 1.111 c $2.10 109 860 969 c Tuesday 04/25/17 Wednesday 04/26117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.40 274 826 1,100 c $1.40 244 824 1.068 c $3.85 360 1.467 1,827 F $3.85 358 1,388 1.746 F $4.95 307 1,355 1,662 F $4.95 333 1.293 1.626 F $4.95 238 1,609 1.847 F $4.95 238 1,662 1,900 F $3.85 160 1,473 1.633 F $3.85 141 1,369 1,510 E $2.10 109 930 1,039 c $2.10 86 763 849 c Tuesday 05/02/17 Wednesday 05/03/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Thursday 03/30/17 Friday 03/31117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Thursday 04/06117 Friday 04/07117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.40 232 733 965 c $1.40 191 651 842 c $3.85 381 1,574 1.955 F $3.85 355 1,362 1.717 F $4.95 277 1,443 1,720 F $4.95 263 1,236 1,499 E $4.95 272 1,559 1.831 F 54.95 217 1,236 1.453 E $3.85 181 1.360 1.541 E $3.85 153 890 1,043 c $2.10 202 1.047 1,249 0 $2.10 111 619 730 B Thursday 04/13/17 Friday 04/14117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.40 237 760 997 c 51.40 173 552 725 B $3.85 362 1,544 1,906 F $3.85 322 1.368 1.690 F $4.95 277 1,440 1.717 F $4.95 217 1,036 1,253 0 $4.95 196 1,486 1,682 F $4.95 180 999 1,179 c $3.85 145 1,248 1,393 0 $3.85 115 822 937 c $2.10 107 879 986 c $2.10 102 659 761 B Thursday 04/20/17 Friday 04/21/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.40 246 648 894 c $1.40 227 768 995 c $3.85 343 1,378 1.721 F $3.85 361 1,430 1.791 F $4.95 339 1,417 1,756 F $4.95 278 1,218 1,496 E $4.95 241 1,627 1,868 F 54.95 201 1,240 1,441 E $3.85 187 1,367 1,554 E S3.85 127 1,007 1,134 c $2 10 121 916 1,037 c $2.10 125 951 1,076 c Thursday 04/27/17 Friday 04/28117 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.40 264 869 1, 133 c $1.40 236 768 1,004 c $3.85 397 1,776 2.173 F $3.85 371 1.356 1,727 F $4.95 303 1,465 1,768 F $4.95 277 1,311 1,588 F $4.95 229 1,781 2,010 F $4.95 190 1.265 1.455 E $3.85 170 1,503 1,673 F $3.85 143 1,087 1.230 0 $2.10 118 994 1, 112 c $2.10 116 694 810 c Thursday 05/04/17 Friday 05/05/17 Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS -Saturday Price HOV sov $1.40 23 52 $1.40 34 105 $1.40 65 211 $1.40 104 255 $1.40 116 388 $1.40 159 428 Saturday Price HOV sov $1.40 25 50 $1.40 35 114 $1.40 75 299 $1.40 82 291 $1.40 113 351 $1.40 155 392 Saturday Price HOV SOV $1.40 16 29 $1.40 28 92 $1.40 46 150 $1.40 79 193 $1.40 105 289 $1.40 178 389 Saturday Price HOV sov $1.40 14 28 $1.40 45 137 $1.40 91 240 $1.40 97 297 $1.40 142 413 $1.40 199 428 Saturday Price HOV sov $1.40 31 58 $1.40 40 145 $1.40 69 237 $1.40 97 355 $1.40 145 363 $1.40 186 538 Saturday Price HOV sov " 04101/17 Vol. LOS 75 A 139 A 276 A 359 A 504 B 587 B 04/08117 Vol. LOS 75 A 149 A 374 A 373 A 464 B 547 B 04/15/17 Vol. LOS 45 A 120 A 196 A 272 A 394 A 567 B 04122117 Vol. LOS 42 A 182 A 331 A 394 A 555 B 627 B 04/29117 Vol. LOS 89 A 185 A 306 A 452 B 508 B 724 8 05106/17 Vol. LOS :E m (/) -i CJ 0 c z c ""C m )> " I :I: 0 c :::0 < 0 r c s: m (/) ~ ~~ i"a UI~ I-' °' UI • .......... _ _. ... .,_r-.•••. __ ... . ...... .,_, ... ·----· ... ,.. _,, .... Sunday 03126117 Monday 03127117 AM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS 0400 -0500 0500 -0600 0600. 0700 0700. 0800 0800. 0900 0900. 1000 Sunday 04102117 Monday 04103117 AM Time Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS 0400. 0500 $1.80 5 2 7 A $1.80 151 675 826 c 0500. 0600 $1.80 0 1 1 A $2.75 145 948 1.093 c 0600. 0700 $1.80 0 0 0 A $4.95 150 892 1.042 c 0700. 0800 $1.80 0 0 0 A $4.95 116 896 1,012 c 0800. 0900 $1.80 0 1 1 A S2.75 61 739 800 B 0900. 1000 $1.80 0 0 0 A $2.75 59 576 635 B Sunday 04109117 Monday 04110117 AM Time Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 0400. 0500 $1.80 13 21 34 A $1.80 132 723 855 c 0500. 0600 S1.80 12 41 53 A $2.75 162 1.008 1, 170 c 0600. 0700 $1.80 23 61 84 A $4.95 175 930 1, 105 c 0700. 0800 $1 80 38 108 146 A $4.95 105 998 1, 103 c 0800. 0900 $1.80 62 160 222 A $2.75 79 802 881 c 0900 -1000 $1.80 122 229 351 A $2.75 79 595 674 B Sunday 04116117 Monday 04117117 AM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 0400 -0500 $1.80 5 22 27 A $1.80 148 675 823 c 0500. 0600 $1.80 11 26 37 A S2.75 163 1,074 1,237 D 0600. 0700 $1.80 8 39 47 A $4.95 182 1,013 1, 195 c 0700. 0800 $1.80 30 67 97 A $4.95 114 993 1, 107 c 0800 -0900 $1.80 58 115 173 A $2.75 94 789 883 c 0900. 1000 $1.80 180 211 391 A $2.75 75 604 679 B Sunday 04123117 Monday 04124117 AM Time Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov v01. LOS 0400. 0500 $1.80 9 12 21 A $1.80 145 748 893 c 0500. 0600 $1.80 0 0 0 A $2.75 175 1. 147 1,322 D 0600. 0700 $1.80 0 0 0 A $4.95 205 1.082 1.287 D 0700. 0800 $1.80 0 1 1 A $4.95 163 1.211 1.374 D 0800. 0900 $1.80 0 1 1 A $2.75 84 903 987 c 0900. 1000 $1.80 0 0 0 A $2.75 63 643 706 B Sunday 04130117 Monday 05101117 AM Time Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS 0400 -0500 $1.80 10 25 35 A 0500. 0600 $1.80 17 37 54 A 0600 -0700 $1.80 36 60 96 A 0700 -0800 $1.80 53 105 158 A 0800. 0900 $1.80 71 161 232 A 0900. 1000 $1.80 118 240 358 A Tuesday 03128117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Tuesday 04104117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 132 636 768 B $2.75 163 1,011 1.174 c $4.95 173 892 1.065 c $4.95 105 1,012 1, 117 c $2.75 68 848 916 c $2.75 79 645 724 B Tuesday 04111117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 134 636 770 B S2.75 125 836 961 c $4.95 180 1,050 1,230 D $4 95 1117 .2· 1,228 D $2.75 81 979 1,060 c $2.75 89 670 759 B Tuesday 04118117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 137 687 824 c $2.75 177 1.141 1,318 D $4.95 186 1,089 1,275 D $4.95 148 1,253 1,401 E $2.75 84 954 1,038 c $2.75 92 715 807 c Tuesday 04125117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 136 712 848 c $2.75 189 1, 124 1,313 D $4.95 200 1,072 1.272 D $4.95 162 1.221 1.383 D $2.75 84 952 1,036 c $2.75 74 683 757 B Tuesday 05102117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Wednesday 03129117 Thursday 03130117 Friday 03131117 Saturday 04101117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 14 36 50 A $1.80 17 67 84 A $1.80 35 152 187 A $1.80 53 160 213 A $1.80 85 281 366 A $1.80 93 283 376 A Wednesday 04105117 Thursday 04106117 Friday 04107117 Saturday 04108117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 142 617 759 B $1.80 138 611 749 B $1.80 116 510 626 B $1.80 17 39 56 A $2.75 169 999 1, 168 c $2.75 160 963 1.123 c $2.75 141 816 957 c $1.80 21 81 102 A $4.95 185 969 1, 154 c $4.95 161 911 1,072 c $4.95 168 742 910 c $1.80 44 137 181 A $4.95 117 1,047 1, 164 c $4.95 103 961 1,064 c $4.95 97 805 902 c $1.80 43 219 262 A $2.75 76 837 913 c $2.75 88 881 969 c $2.75 73 647 720 B $1.80 81 282 363 A $2.75 88 662 750 B $2.75 74 674 748 B $2.75 66 481 547 B $1.80 95 274 369 A Wednesday 04112117 Thursday 04113117 Friday 04114117 Saturday 04115117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 134 649 783 B $1.80 134 599 733 B $1.80 95 430 525 B $1.80 16 29 45 A $2.75 157 997 1, 154 c $2.75 162 1.065 1,227 D S2.75 133 764 897 c $1.80 26 64 90 A $4.95 184 1,005 1, 189 c $4.95 194 1.014 1,208 D $4.95 138 674 812 c $1.80 28 108 136 A S4 9o 126 1.077 .203 D $4.95 113 1,022 1.135 c $4.95 81 631 712 B $1.80 51 157 208 A $2.75 64 902 966 c $2.75 74 882 956 c $2.75 68 513 581 B $1.80 84 231 315 A $2.75 108 706 814 c $2.75 86 606 692 B $2.75 81 438 519 B $1.80 112 290 402 B Wednesday 04119117 Thursday 04120117 Friday 04121117 Saturday 04122117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS $1.80 130 720 850 c $1.80 144 666 810 c $1.80 105 567 672 B $1.80 16 55 71 A $2.75 179 1.180 1,359 D S2.75 167 1, 152 1.319 D $2.75 133 853 986 c $1.80 20 82 102 A $4.95 197 1.123 1,320 D $4.95 187 1.013 1.200 c $4.95 162 753 915 c $1.80 64 169 233 A $4.95 147 1, 150 1,297 D $4.95 131 1,084 1.215 D $4.95 97 813 910 c $1.80 75 187 262 A $2.75 83 861 944 c $2.75 79 945 1.024 c $2.75 87 685 772 B $1.80 66 276 342 A $2.75 63 643 706 B $2.75 62 702 764 B $2.75 72 548 620 B $1.80 123 314 437 B Wednesday 04126117 Thursday 04127117 Friday 04128117 Saturday 04129117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV SOV Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS $1.80 141 706 847 c $1.80 145 682 827 c $1.80 136 570 706 B $1.80 22 44 66 A $2.75 171 1, 161 1.332 D $2.75 177 1, 163 1,340 D $2.75 145 943 1,088 c $1.80 18 100 118 A $4.95 233 1,076 1,309 D $4.95 206 1.083 1.289 D $4.95 181 875 1,056 c $1.80 44 177 221 A $4.95 159 1, 146 1,305 D $4.95 127 1.085 1,212 D $4.95 118 792 910 c $1.80 75 201 276 A S2.75 72 966 1,038 c $2.75 82 910 992 c $2.75 70 749 819 c $1.80 75 294 369 A $2.75 82 709 791 B $2.75 68 730 798 B $2.75 59 506 565 B $1.80 130 321 451 B Wednesday 05103117 Thursday 05104117 Friday 05105117 Saturday 05106117 Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS Price HOV sov Vol. LOS • • " " " OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS On-road Operations RCTC Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) responded to 116 calls during the month of April. Of those calls , 73 were to assist disabled vehicles and 27 calls to remove debris . There were 11 accidents in the Express Lanes without any originating in the SR91 general- purpose lanes that affected the Express Lanes. FSP also responded to 5 information requests . A Express l!.iLanes 17 FINANCIAL HIGHL IG T S RCTC RCTC 91 Express Lanes Operating Statement YTD as of: 4130 /2017 Descr ipti on Actual 11 ) Budget 121 Opera ti ng revenues : Toll revenue $ 2,6 13 ,24 3.25 $ 3,798 ,000 .00 Fee revenue 6 18 93 3.95 - Tota l ope rating revenues 3,232, 177 20 3,798 ,000 00 Opera ti ng expenses : Salaries and Benefits 75 ,135 80 268 ,400 .00 Legal Services 7,54 3 64 25 ,000 00 Audit and Accounting Fees -19 ,000 .00 Service Fees -22 ,000 .00 Other Pro fe ssional Services -241 ,000 .00 Leas e Expense 16 ,63 4 58 231 ,500 .00 Operations 307,57 5 8 1 1,231 ,900 .00 Utilities 1,256 58 19 ,900 .00 Suppl ies and Materials 72 6 98 22 ,500 .00 Me mbersh ip and Subscript io n Fees -23 ,000 .00 Office Equipment & Furniture (No n-Capita -5,000 00 Maintenance /Repairs 10 ,04 2 09 706 ,700 .00 Training Sem ina rs an d Con ferences -15,300 .00 Transportation Expenses -22,800 .00 Lodging -6,000 .00 Meals -2,000 .00 Advertis ing -388 ,300 .00 Program Operations 15,74 7 71 3,052 ,800 .00 Bad Debt Expense 3 36 - Tota l ope rati ng expenses 434,66 6 55 6,553 , 100 .00 Opera ti ng income (l oss ) 2,797,51 0 65 (2 ,755 , 100 .00) Nonope rati ng re venues (expenses ): Interest inco me 49 7 20 6,800 .00 Other 2 345 ,000 .00 Tota l nonopera ti ng revenues (expenses ) 49 7 20 2,351 ,800 .00 Trans fers in 3 137,66 5 99 3, 137,700 .00 Transfers out -- Net income (loss ) $ 5,935,673.84 $ 2,734 ,400 .00 (1) Represents 5 weeks of operations (2) Repres ents 6 mon ths of operations based on ant icipa ted Janu ary 9, 2017 openi ng A Express l!JLanes YID Variance Dolla r$ Pe rcen t(%) $ (1 ,184 ,756 .75) (3 1.2) 618 933 .95 N/A (565 ,822 80) (14 9) N/A 193 ,264.20 72.0 17,45636 698 19 ,000 .00 100 .0 22 ,000 00 1000 241 ,000 .00 100 .0 214 ,865 .42 92 .8 924 ,324 .19 75 .0 18 ,643.42 93 .7 21 ,77302 96 .8 23 ,000 .00 100 .0 5,000 .00 100 .0 696 ,657 .91 98 .6 15 ,300 .00 100 .0 22 ,800 .00 100 .0 6,000 .00 100 .0 2,000 .00 100 .0 388 ,300 .00 100 .0 3,037 ,052 .29 99 .5 (3 .36) N/A -N/A 6, 118 ,433 .45 93.4 5,552 ,610 .65 (201 .5) (6 ,302 .80) (9 27) 12 345 000 .00} (100 .0) (2,351 ,302 .80) 100 .0 (34 .01) (0 .0) N/A $ 3,201 ,273 .84 11 7.1 • • • " " " JOINT AGENCY TRIP AND REVENUE STATISTICS MONTI-I ENDING April 30 , 2017 Transactions Apr-17 Transactions by Using Both % Using Both MTD Agency Segments Segments Revenue Westbound OCTA 6 1 3 ,569 334,440 55% $ 1 ,534 ,4 70 RCTC 590 ,68 1 334 ,440 57% $ 1,295 ,2 79 1-1 5 235 ,673 1 40 ,897 60 % $533 ,181 l\/lc Ki nley 355 ,008 1 93 ,543 55 % $ 76 2 ,098 Eastbound OCTA 680 ,650 3 2 7 ,815 48% $ 2 ,349 ,125 RCTC 559 ,953 327 ,815 59% $ 1 ,045 ,75 1 1-1 5 1 89 ,463 1 27 ,979 68% $ 3 2 0 ,7 1 7 l\/lc Ki nley 370 ,4 90 1 99 ,836 54 % $ 725 ,035 Jo int Agency Traffic Statistics 800 ,000 700 ,000 600 ,000 500 ,000 400 ,000 300 ,000 57 % 59 % 200 ,000 100 ,000 OCTA RCTC OCTA RCTC Westbound Eastbound " OCTA Transactions RCTC Transactions " % of OCTA Transactions Using Both Segments " % of RCTC Transactions Using Both Segments A Express l!iLanes 19 Performance Measures REPORTING REQUIREMENT ~ Repo _rting I PERFORMANCE STANDARD j Apr-17 ' Period Perform a nee , ---- CUSTOMER SERVICE ** Call Wait Tirre Mont hly Not to exceed 2 rrinutes 1 :45 ** Abandon Rate Mont hly No rrore than 4 .0 % 2 .5 % Custorrer Satisfaction M ont hly A t le a st 75 outbound calls 81 Convert Violators to Custorrers Quart er ly 8 % o r rrore Convert Violators to Custorrers Annuall y 10% or rrore --- VIOLATION PROCESSING Response Tirre M ont hly Wit h in 2 business days of receipt 1 .0 CUSA Violation Collection Rate Quart erly 70% o r rrore CUSA Violation Collection Rate Annuall y 74% or rrore --- TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Initial & Secondary Reviews M ont hly 8:j ua l to or less than 15 days 0 .8 * Plate Misread Errors M ont hly 8:j ua l to or less than 0.4% 0 .01 % CAS Response Tirre M ont hly ___ 0 :2 0 (rrinutes) per call 0:07 ACCOUNTING OCTA Exceptions M ont hly No rrore than 3 I 0 RCTC Exceptions M ont hly No rrore than 3 0 --- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Back-office System Uptirre M ont hly 9 9% A vailability I 100% Network Uptirre M ont hly 9 9% A vailability 100% GUSA= Cofiroute USA ; GAS= OCTA Customer Assistan c e S p ec ialis ts •Plate Mis read Error performance is current after a 60-day h o Id-b ac k pe no d ; t hereto re , percentage reported here is for 2 months prior to the month of this report. -Abandon rate and wait time may not be accurate due to pend in g IVR re po rt data which impacts the statistics . Transponder Distribution I April-17 I March-17 ~ TRANSPONDER DISTRIBUTION -----r----------~-- Tags % of Total Tags f T . . . --· ---~ ~ ,.. ....... -" -. ~-~ ---- Issued To New Accounts Additional Tags to Existing Accounts Replacement Transponders Returned Account Closures Accounts Downs iz ing Defective Transponders A Express l!.i Lanes Total Issued Total Returned 2 ,6 71 944 1,086 4,701 437 258 1,0 10 1,705 56 .8% 2,810 53 .9% 1,308 44 .7% 20 .1% 976 18 .7% 669 22 .8% 23 .1% 1,428 27.4 % 952 32 .5% 5,214 2,929 2 56% 731 31 .6% 451 30 .1% 151 % 223 9.7% 163 10 .9% 59 .2 % 1,356 58 .7% 885 59 .0% 2,310 1,499 20 • • • " " " At the end of April 2017 , the 91 Exp ress Lanes had 126 ,393 active customer accounts , and 191 ,652 transponders classified as Assigned. Number of Accounts by Fiscal Year As of April 30, 2017 130,000 125,000 119,992 119,782 1 2 0 ,000 118,416 117,888 116,8 1 3 11 5 ,000 114 �556 1 14,1 38 113,672 1 1 0 ,000 105,000 F isca l Y e a r Incoming Email Activity During April the Anaheim Processing Center received a total of 2 ,886 emails . A Express J!jLanes 1 26,393 21 ···.., 6. " m OCTA " " June 2, 2017 To: State Route 91 Advisory Committee From: Darrell Johnson, Chief Executive Officer Subject: 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Overview The Orange County Transportation Authority annually prepares a long-range plan for improvements along the State Route 91 corridor between State Route 57 in Orange County and Interstate 15 in Riverside County. The plan includes a listing of potential improvements, preliminary cost estimates, and potential implementation timeframes. These improvements are sponsored by various agencies, including the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the California Department of Transportation. The 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan includes the latest project information and serves as reference for future project development efforts. Recommendation Receive and file as an information item. Background AB 1010 (Chapter 688, Statutes of 2002) requires the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to annually prepare a plan and a proposed schedule for improvements along State Route 91 (SR-91) between Interstate 15 (1-15) and State Route 55 (SR-55). The preparation of the plan is conducted in collaboration with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), the Transportation Corridor Agencies, and the cities of Anaheim, Corona, and Yorba Linda. On September 30, 2008, SB 1316 (Chapter 714, Statutes of 2008) was signed into law. This bill built upon AB 1010 to extend the limits of the corridor to State Route 57 (SR-57), authorized RCTC to operate a toll facility along the portion of the SR-91 in Riverside County, and extended the timeframe for the operations of the toll lanes to 2065. SB 1316 also allows the use of excess toll revenues for congestion relief projects or services along the SR-91 corridor between SR-57 and the Orange/Riverside County line. Orange County Transportation Authority 550 South Main Street/ P.O. Box 141841 Orange/ California 92863-15841 (714) 560-0CTA (6282) _2_0_11~S-ta_t_e_R_o_u_te~9-1-lm~p-le_m_e_n_t_a_ti_o_n_P_1a_n~~~~~~~~~~-P-a_g_e~2 • The intent of the SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) is to list a suite of congestion relief projects and outline improvements in the SR-91 corridor that are possible given the elimination of the non-compete clause related to the franchise agreement under AB 680 (Chapter 310, Statutes 1995). The Plan describes projects and transportation benefits, anticipated implementation schedules by milestone year, and costs for major projects through 2035. The projects for the Plan have been updated based on the latest information provided by the project sponsors. Discussion Since 2002, OCTA, Caltrans, and RCTC have made significant progress in improving the SR-91. Completed projects include: • • • • • • Green River Road Overcrossing Improvement Project North Main Street Corona Metrolink Parking Structure Project Eastbound lane addition from State Route 241 (SR-241) to State Route 71 (SR-71) Lane addition in both directions between SR-55 and SR-241 Westbound lane at Tustin Avenue Metrolink service improvements A total of $4 78 million has been invested in the completion of six projects, including the addition of 17 lane miles throughout the SR-91 corridor. Since 2003, average daily traffic throughput has increased by 12 percent, showing that improvements within the corridor have helped in alleviating the effects of population growth and facilitated connectivity between Orange and Riverside counties by enhancing capacity and improving mobility. These figures do not include the Riverside County 91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP). Although the CIP is open to traffic, the project remains in the Plan as an active project since formal completion is expected to occur in November 2017. The Plan, which includes input from the stakeholders, is provided in Attachment A. The projects are organized by readiness and logical sequencing. Early improvements in the corridor are anticipated to be completed by 2021 and include four projects, at a total cost of $1.65 billion. The planned projects include: • Initial phase of the Riverside County 91 CIP: o Widen SR-91 by one general purpose (GP) lane in each direction • east of Green River Road o Extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 • o Add collector-distributor roads in the vicinity of the City of Corona o Add 1-15/SR-91 direct high-occupancy vehicle/high-occupancy toll (HOV/HOT) south connector " " " 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Page3 o Add southbound HOV/HOT lanes on 1-15 to Ontario Avenue o Provide system/local interchange improvements " Express bus service improvements between Orange and Riverside counties " Direct connector between the 91 Express Lanes and SR-241 " Metrolink Service and Station Improvements Three other projects are slated for implementation between 2022 and 2030, including improvements at the SR-71/SR-91 interchange, widening SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 and 1-15/SR-91 direct north connector. Projects anticipated for implementation by 2030 are estimated to cost between $524 million and $1 billion. Improvements for implementation by 2035 focus on longer lead time concepts and include: " " Ultimate phase of the 91 CIP: o Widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71 o Improving SR-91, east of 1-15 Fairmont Boulevard improvements at SR-91 The post-2035 list of improvements included in Appendix A of the Plan are highly conceptual in nature. Some of the concepts are derived from the Riverside -Orange County Major Investment Study. Appendix A includes an elevated four-lane facility between SR-241 and 1-15, Anaheim to Ontario International Airport high-speed ground transportation system, and the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) from SR-241/State Route 133 to 1-15/ Cajalco Road, connector improvements at the SR-91/SR-55 interchange, and an eastbound fifth lane addition near SR-241. The projected cost of the post-2035 projects is in excess of $14 billion, and the implementation will require a significant amount of planning, design, external funding, and future policy and public input. Lastly, staff continues to monitor the financial viability of the ICE concept as requested by the SR-91 Advisory Committee and the Riverside Orange Corridor Authority in 2010. The ICE has not moved beyond the conceptual phase due to the current economic climate, lack of state and federal transportation funding, and the high construction cost. Until considerable advancements are made in efficient and affordable tunneling technology, and more state and federal funding is available, this project will be a major challenge to complete . 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Page4 Summary OCTA has completed the 2017 Plan required by AB 1010 and subsequently, SB 1316 legislation. Updates include project schedules, project descriptions, costs, and traffic analysis. Attachment A. Draft 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan 2017 Prepared by: ~~-~ ,, Alison Army Senior Transportation Analyst Project Development (714) 560-5537 Approved by: Kia Mortazavi Executive Director, Planning (714) 560-5741 • • • ATTACHMENT A • DrattSTATE ROUTE 91 • Prepared by: Michael Baker Austin Transportation Consulting 'Atr.C:;:t-11: i:tii. liiiiRlllmBB INTERNATIONAL TABLE CF" CONTENTS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ • TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 1: 2017 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE ............................................................................................ 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ................................................................................................................. 9 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2021 .................................................................................................................................. 10 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2030 .................................................................................................................................. 15 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035 .................................................................................................................................. 19 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A-POST-2035 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS ....................................................... 22 SECTION 4: APPENDIX B -COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS ....................................................................... 28 SECTION 5: REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 35 • • .A u 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN " SECTION1: 201 7 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in California. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four-lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of State Route 91 (SR-91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County line and State Route 55 (SR-55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users tens of millions of hours of commuting time. While the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the SR-91 corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies " from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor through the year 2030 from Interstate 15 (1-15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to eliminate the non-compete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much- needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The bill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity-enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed on January 3, 2003, placing the road in public " ands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elimination of he non-compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by OCTA, di 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in September 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC}, and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and RCTC, to issue an annual SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR-57) to 1-15. The Plans prior to adoption of SB 1316 included a westerly project limit of SR-55. The Plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess toll revenue and other funds . This 2017 Plan is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2016 report, which was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Plans. This year's update includes projects that were identified in the 2006 Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT} Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County line to 1-15 (currently under construction), the California Transportation Commission (CTC} Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2017 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobility on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual 1 lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2017 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This Plan will provide OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual Plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the Plan. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. The 2017 Plan includes select completed project exhibits as a historical reference, see Section 4 Appendix B. Completed Construction/Improvement Projects As of June 2017, the following improvements have been constructed or implemented: •!• Repave and seal pavement surfaces, restripe, and replace raised channelizers on the 91 Express Lanes. •!• EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR-71 to the Serfas Club Drive off-ramp. •!• WB auxiliary lane extension between the County line and SR-241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County line to SR-241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. •!• WB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR-71 and the County line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR-71 & SR-241. •!• Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route and Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona. •!• Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re-striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. •!• Green River Road overcrossing replacement (See Section 4). ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN •!• Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 4). •!• EB SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71 (See • Section 4). •!• Additional SR-91 WB and EB travel lane between SR-55 and SR-241 (See Section 4). •!• SR-91 WB bypass lane to Tustin Avenue at SR-55 (See Section 4). •!• Metrolink Service Improvements (See Section 4). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and/or improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of SR-91. The completed EB SR-91 lane addition project from SR-241 to SR-71 (See Section 4) has greatly enhanced highway operations. This accounts for some of the improvement in existing EB p.m. peak hour travel time from approximately 70+ minutes in 2010 to approximately 50 minutes in 2014 (for the baseline travel time). In addition, there are two projects that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved • Prado Dam (near SR-71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks have been improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segments of the Santa Ana River to be improved are Reach 9 Phase 2A, which includes areas along SR-91 from just east of the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR-71, and segments along Weir Canyon Road near Savi Ranch. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 Phase 28 by relocating the Santa Ana River. This has greatly enhanced the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 Phase 2B improvements were under construction as of September 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding and construction was finalized in April 2015. Environmental mitigation within the Santa Ana River perennial stream habitat restoration area will continue fo. another six years of the nine year mitigation program. 2 The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $120 • million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and was in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to SR-91, Caltrans highway R/W was relinquished to the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the remaining State R/W subsequent to relinquishment. This project completed the construction 19hase in mid-2014. The WB SR-91 Widening Project completed construction in 2016 from State College Blvd to Interstate 5 (1-5). This project added one WB general purpose lane and removed the dedicated exit lane to State College Blvd from the SB SR-57 to WB SR-91 Connector that was causing operational issues due to the short weaving distance. While this project falls just to the west of the limits for the Plan study area, it will have an influence on operations • within the Plan area and on Project 6. Completed Designs and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are various project development phase documents (Feasibility Reports, Studies, PSR, PA/ED, or PS&E) that are completed, or are in draft form and anticipated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility. These documents include (also see Section 5): •!• MIS -Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). •!• Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). •!• Project Study Report for SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (December 2006). •!• RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). •!• SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study (December 2009). •!• Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange • •!• ~:~::~R:a~::d: F~:~~ R:~::(A~I:~~ :;;~~d August 2007 and subsequently renamed as the ,e 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Capital Action Plan (April 2011 ) . •!• PSR-PDS for SR-241/SR-91 Connector (January 2012). •!• PS&E for Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) Project (2014). •!• PSR-PDS on SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (October 2014). •!• Measure M Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan), (November 2016). Updates from the 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan In addition to the improvements and progress noted above, the following items that were included in the 2016 SR-91 Implementation Plan have been modified for the 2017 Plan update: •!• Various project descriptions, costs, and schedules have been updated from the 2016 Plan based on continued project development. •!• Project schedules have been revised within the horizon year timelines. The 2019 horizon year is updated to 2021. •!• The Metrolink Short-Term Expansion Plan has been restructured with station portions of the plan included in the updated Project 3 -Metrolink Service and Station Improvements, and with currently completed service enhancements included as Project B-6 (see Appendix B) and schedule has advanced by 10 years. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR-57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and 1-15 in the City of Corona in Riverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is 3 defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: •!• Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the close proximity of the Westbound (WB) Main Street off-ramp. •!• High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. A significant number of this traffic is redirected (balanced) traffic trying to bypass mainline congestiqn. •!• One of the two EB lanes from The Eastern Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) is dropped at the merge to State Route 91 (SR-91), causing additional congestion in the EB direction. •!• Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. EB truck traffic must make two lane changes to stay on EB SR-91. •!• SR-55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Imperial Highway creating a weave condition. •!• WB SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR-55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also occurs on the left-hand side of SR-91 as opposed to the typical right-hand connector exit. •!• High demand from Weir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue increases delay during the peak hours. •!• WB traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue to southbound (SB) SR-55 contributes to mainline congestion by weaving through three lanes on WB SR-91. •!• The existing two lane connector from WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 is over capacity. •!• There is a trap lane from EB SR-91 that terminates at SB SR-241 which creates a chokepoint in the area. PRD.JEC:::T SUMMARY Many of the highway projects and concepts identified in this 2017 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are di 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 summarizes the • various pending, potential concepts, and completed projects in the 2017 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation/construction schedule (see Section 2 for detailed pending projects, Section 3 Appendix A for concept project summaries, and Section 4 Appendix B for completed project summaries): •!• The first set of projects is anticipated to be completed by 2021 and includes four improvements at a total cost of approximately $1.65 billion. The projects include the Initial SR-91 CIP that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green River Rd, add collector-distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at 1-15/SR-91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements; Express Bus service improvements; Metrolink service and station improvements; and a State Route 241 (SR-241 )/ 91 Express Connector. These projects are in the process of final design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as • noted in the project summaries. •!• Three projects for implementation by 2030 include the interchange improvements at SR-71/SR-91, SR-91 widening improvements between SR-57 and SR-55, and the 1-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector. OCTA, RCTC, and Caltrans have initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. The 2030 projects are funded and underway in various stages of project development. Projects for implementation by 2030 would cost approximately $650 million to $754 million. •!• Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer- lead time projects and include a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard, and the Ultimate SR-91 CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. •!• Long-range concepts for potential Post-203- implementation (potentially earlier if funding become available) in Appendix A include an elevated 4-lane 4 " facility (MIS Corrid or A) from SR-241 to 1-15, the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail , the Irvine-Corona Expressway {ICE) 4-lane facility from SR-241 /SR-133 to 1-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B), the WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Improvements, and the EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 . This multi-billion dollar potential concept program requires a significant amount of planning , design , and future policy and public input. In some cases , these concepts may include previous projects as components , such that all concepts within this summary may not be implemented . Traffic Analysis For the 2017 Plan , the traffic analysis for major SR-91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2016 Plan. This analysis used the latest freeway operations software model available from UC Berkeley and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since the " 2016 Plan. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists compared to traditional travel demand models . The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models . This approach is especially important given high SR-91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic . For example , a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow , cascading delay through the traffic stream , and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: " :" New SR -91 WB /EB lanes from SR-71 to 1-15 by 2017 (Initial GIP , Project 1). " :" SR-241 /9 1 Express Connector with lanes to Coal Canyon on SR-91 by 2021 (Project 4). " :" SR-91 EB lane between SR-57 and SR-55 by 2030 (Project 6). New SR-91 WB /EB lanes , various segments from SR-241 to east of 1-15 by 2035 (Ultimate GIP , ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Table 1 -SR-91 Implementation Plan Projects Project . . Cost No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) ($M) Projects By Year 2021 Initial Phase CIP : Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in 1,407 Ea ch Direction East of Green River Rd , CD Roads and 1-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector , Extension of Exp ress Lanes to 1-15 and System /Local Interchange Improvements (2017) 2 Express Bus Service Improvements Between Orange 6 County and Rive rside County (2017) 3 Metrolink Service and Stati on Improvements (2020) 55 .8 4 SR-241/91 Express Connector (2021) 181 SUBTOTAL 1,650 Projects By Year 2030 5 SR-71 /SR-91 Inte rchange lmp ~ovements (2023) 123.4 6 SR-91 between SR-57 and SR~55 (2030) 347-450 7 1-15/SR-91 Direct North Connector (2030) 180 SUBTOTAL 650 -754 Projects By Year 2035 8 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (By 2035) 76 .8 9 Ultimate CIP : Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each TBD Direc tion from SR-241 to SR-71 and SR -9 1 Improvements East of 1-15 (203 5) SUBTOTAL 77+ Appx. . y ) Cost A Concept Summary (Implementation ear ($M) Concepts By Post-2035 and Conceptual Projects A-1 Elevated 4-Lane Fa cility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 2,720 to 1-15 (Post-2035) A-2 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High 2,770- Speed Rail (Pos t-2035) 3,20 0 A-3 Irvine-Corona Exp ressway (IC E) 4-Lane Facility from 8,855 SR-241 /SR -1 33 to 1-15/Cajalco Road (Post-2035) A-4 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Improvements (Pos t-2035) 75-150 A-5 EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 31 SUBTOTAL 14,451 - 14,956 Appx. Completed Project Summary Since 2006 Cost B (Constructed Year) ($M) B-1 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement (March 24.3 2009) B-2 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking 25 Structure (June 2009) B-3 Eastbound Lane Add ition from SR-241 to SR-71 51.2 (Septembe r 2010) 8-4 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Addi ng a 85.2 5th GP Lane in Ea ch Direction (January 2013) B-5 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue (April 2016) 45.2 B-6 Metrolink Service Imp rov ements (June 2016) 249 5 Project 9). The WB morning (a.m .) traffic analysis results ind icate that for the year 2021 forecasts , travel times in Riversi de Coun ty are anticipated to improve significantly (by abou t 8 minutes) due to the inclusion of the Initial Phase of the CIP (Project 1 ), but increase slightly (by about 1 minute ) in Orange County . Bottlenecks are anticipated at the Orange-R iverside County line and at the SR-2 41 interchange /Gypsum Canyon interchange area . A mi nor bottleneck is shown at the SR-55 interchange . The main bottlenecks in Riverside County have decreased becau se of the completion of proposed projects (including the In it ial Phase of the CIP), though some congestion is stil l forecasted . In the year 2030 forecast , WB bottlenec ks occur at the Orange-R iverside County line and at the SR- 241 interchange /Gypsum Canyon interchange area. This results in an increase in travel time within Rivers ide County from about 27 minutes in 2021 to about 45 minutes in 2030. The completion of Project 6 improv es the minor bottleneck at the SR -55 interchange. Assumi ng Corridor A and the ICE are not constructed by 20 35, bottlenecks appear at the Orange -Riverside County li ne, at the SR-241 interchange /Gypsum Canyon interchan ge area , and a minor bottleneck at the SR-55 interchang e. With complet ion of the ultimate CIP project , Rivers ide County 2035 travel times (about 19 minutes) impro ve dramatically with reduction to below 2021 levels (about 27 minutes). For all forecast hor izon years , travel times in Orange County remain relatively unchanged betwe en d:. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Existing (2016) and 2030 and show an increase in 2035 (approx imately 5 minutes over exist ing) due to the growth in tr affic and alleviation of bottlenecks upstream . A project • to address the operational aspects for the WB SR-91 to SB SR -55 movement is included (see Concept A-4) in addi tion to exploring multi-modal opportunities by OCTA on, or adjacent to , the SR -91 corr idor that could provide addi tional congest ion relief. The EB evening (p .m.) peak hour traffic analysis indicates that for the year 2021 forec asts , bottlenecks are shown just before the SR-55 interchange , at the Orange- Ri verside County line , and just before the Main Street inte rchange. Implementation of Projec t 1, the Initial Phase of the CIP , results in decreased Riverside County corr idor tr avel times from approx imately 26 minutes to 17 minutes in 2021. In the year 2030 forecast , EB bottlenecks are still shown west of the SR -55 interchange at the Orange- Riverside County line , and just before the Main Street interchange , with overall travel time increasing by approximately 11 minutes compared to 2021 conditions. For the 2035 horizon year , bottlenecks appear at SR -55 , at SR-241 , and j~st before the Main Street interchange . • The 2035 travel times for EB SR -91 in Riverside County are reduced due to the comp letion of proposed projects but gradually increase (to an add itional 14 minutes) in Orange County when compared to 2021 . Figures 1-1 and 1-2 below show the existing (2016) and horizon year corr idor travel times by County . • 6 " " Figure 1-1-Mainline Westbound SR-91from1 -15 to SR-57 A.M . Pea k Hour Average Travel Time (Minutes) 120 100 80 60 40 -...._ _ _._.. -rr~') c o('"" ., . 4 20 ._..... .... ............ ~ - 0 Ex ist ing (201 6) 202 1 2030 2035 131 0range Co unty Cll Riv er side County Figure 1-2-Mainline Eastbound SR -91 from SR-57to1-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time (Minutes) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Exi sti ng {201 6) 20 21 131 Orange County I CE STATUS SUMMARY The ICE concept (see Concept A-3) was conce ived as part of the MIS and was established as part of a suite of projects to support future peak demand volumes between Riverside and Orange Counties . The ICE was further evaluated in 2009 for financial and geotechnical feasibility. Seven (7) primary feasib ility issues were considered: 2030 2035 IJ Riversi d e County " !" Corridor concepts (full tunnel and part ial tunnel /part ial surface road ). " !" Tunnel configuration . " !" Tunnel excavation and support methods. " !" Tunnel systems (e .g. ventilat ion , emergency fire system , operat ion building , toll system , etc .) . " " !" Geologic , hydrogeologic /hydrologic , geotechn ical conditions. and " !" Construct ion considerations. " !" Construction , Operat ion & Maintenance (O&M) costs . d:. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 7 At the conclusion of the financ ial and geo techn ic al feas ibility study in 2010 , the Riverside-Orange Corri dor Authority Board (ROCA) directed staff to shelve the project due to its high construction cost and the difficult economic climate , and to reevaluate the concept on an annual basis during the preparation of the SR -91 Implementation Plan . The National Forest Service has continued mon itor ing of the ground water level along the preliminary alignment of the tunnel and has not found any significant chang es since 2010 . The technological ability to cons truct the large-diameter tunnels is currently available ; however , the cost of tun oel boring machines (TBM) required to construct this project has not been reduced significan tl y. ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN In general , no significant changes to the seven feas ibility is sues considered for the ICE concept have occurred over • th e last seven years . Conclusion An assessment of current economic conditions , lack of st ate and federal transportation funding ; and the high construction cost is hamper ing the ability of OCTA and RCTC to implement this concept. Unt il considerable advancements are made in regards to efficient and affordable tunneling technology , and more state and fe deral funding are made available , the concept will re main a challenge to implement. • • 8 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .OVERVIEW The 2017 Plan describes projects, implementation schedules , key consideration , benefits , and costs (in 2017 dollars, or as noted) for major projects and concepts through Post-2035 . Some of the projects and concepts identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS and subsequent updates . The schedules for implementation of the packages of projects include 2021 , 2030 , and 2035. The 2021 projects are capable of being implemented through the project development process with minimal to moderate environmental constraints or are under construction . Some of the longer-range projects for 2030 and 2035 require more significant planning and environmental assessment prior to design . Each of the project or concept improvements includes an • estimated project schedule. It is important to note that implementing various time saving measures , such as design-build or contractor incentives for early completion , may potentially reduce project schedules . The implementation phases are defined as follows : •!• Conceptual Engineering = Pre-Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) -Conceptual planning and engineering for project scoping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase . •!• Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) -Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds . •!• Environmental = Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) -The detailed concept design that provides environ111ental clearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition . The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. •!• Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) -Provide detailed design to contractors for construction bidding and implementation . •!• Construction = The project has completed construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists . The intent of these Implementation Plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA , RCTC and Caltrans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1 -SR-91 Project Study Area from SR-57 to 1-15 .. b o• " .............. A NAHEIM • a. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Bernardino CHINO HILLS ~ .. 9 PROJECTS BY YEAR 202 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The first set of projects will be completed by 2021 and includes fou r (4) improvements at a total cost of approximately $1 .65 • billion (in 2017 dollars , or as noted). The projects includ e the In itial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green Rive r Rd, add co ll ector-distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at 1-15 /SR-91 , extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and pro vide system /local interchange improvements; Express Bus service improvements ; Metrolink Service and Sta tion Imp ro vements; and a SR-241/ 91 Express Connector . Further details for each of the projects are included follow ing the summa ry below . Project No. 1 2 3 4 Project Summary (Implementation Year) Initial Phase CIP : Widen SR-91 by One GP Lan e in Ea ch Direc tio n East of Green River Rd , CD Roads and 1-15 /SR-91 Direct South Connector , Extension of Ex pre ss Lane s to 1-15 and System /Local Interchange Imp rovemen ts (20 17 ) Express Bus Service Improvements (2017 ) Metrolink Service and Station Improvements (20 20) SR-241 /91 Express Connector (202 1) SUBTOTAL Figure 2-2 -Summary of Pro ject s fo r Implementation By 2021 Bernardino C HI NO HI LLS L~ ' ' ' ' \ ' ' ' \. ' \ ' Cost ($M) 1,407 6 55 .8 181 1,650 NORCO . ; r i o,,, .. J • .. • • ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10 " Project No: 1 Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate' Total Capital Cost $ 1, 161,000,000 Support Cost S 246,000,000 Total Project Cost $ 1,407 ,000,000 Project Schedule" Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed Completed 2013-2017 ' Cost obtained for Initial Phase is from RCTC (2014 dollars) Schedule for lnital Phase; subsequent phase for Ultimate Project anticipated in 2035 (see Project #9) LEGEND -Existing Highway -lnterchanQeJRamp -Countyline " " " Coal Canyon Crossing EJll HOV Lane ,!f:. Tolled Express Lane -Exishng Lane -Proposed Improvement Lane -CD Road -Auxitiary Lane Braided Connector " " Initial Phase CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP lane In Each Direction East of Green River Road, CD Roads and 1-15/SR-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System I Local Interchange Improvements Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (GIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, includes the addition of a 5th general purpose lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes al various locations, additional lanes al the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #5), and collector-distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15/SR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of SR-91 (EBIWB)/1-15 (SB/NB) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15/Cajalco Road, and northerly to 1-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. An Express Lanes ingress/egress lane is also planned near the County Line. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. The following is a summary of the deferred ultimate improvements: 1-15/SR-91 median North Direct Connector (Project #7), and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway (Project #9); general purpose lanes and Express Lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street; and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project with an anticipated completion in 2020. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts 1n scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project learn. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the SR-71/SR-91 Interchange (Project #5), the SR-241/91 Express Connector (Project #4), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project. Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate GIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street, along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south, and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operations will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91and1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in Fall 2012 A Design-Build contractor was selected in May 2013 and construction activities began in early 2014 for the Initial Phase The project is anticpated to open to traffic in Spring 2017 with final project acceptance anticipated at the end of 2017. Auto Center Dr Maple St Lincoln Av Main St County Line Serfaa Club Dr On From On NB From 1-15 SB 1-15 McKinley St Pierce St Ingress/Egress lanes shown wi1hin the Express Lanes by restriping 3-Lane CD Road Connector from Main St EB on-ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp Additional lane by restripe of existing lanes ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN HOV/HOT lanes to ~15/0ntario Av 11 Project No: 2 Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate* Tota l Annual Capital Cost Tota l Annual Operating Cost $ 1,000 ,000** $ 5 ,000 ,000** Project Schedule Rivers ide/Coro n a to Ana he im Resort Temecu la to Vi llage at O r ange Vill age at Orange to Riverside/Corona Rivers ide/Corona to South Coast Metro FY 20 17 (Planned RTA Route 200) FY 20 17 (Pl anned RTA Route 205) Existing (RTA Route 216) Existing (OCTA Route 794 ) * Capital and Operating costs from OCTA and RCTC (2015 doll ars ) ** 20-year average Ex press Bus Service Improvements Pr oject Des cription • O ra ng e C o u nty Transportation A uthority (OCTA), w ork ing w ith the Rivers ide County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Trans it Age ncy (RTA ), plans an expansion of Express Bus ser vice between R ivers ide an d Orange counties . Commuters lack direct transit con ne ction s to some Orange County emp loyment centers , and ne w Ex pres s Bu s service can provide th is connection . Ex isti n g Ser vice O CTA has o p erated Route 794 since 2006 f rom R ivers ide County to Hutton Cen tr e and South Coast Metro (show n in orange be low ). RTA has o perated Ro ute 2 16 s ince 2010 betw een the Vil lage at Orange and Dow ntown Rivers ide (show n in red be low). New Servi c e Tw o new Ex press Bus routes are planned for implementation by Fisca l Year 20 17 between Rive rside County and Orange County includ ing RTA route 20 0 (show n in blue below) from Rive rside County to Corona and to t he An a hei m Resort. The route would include th ree A M and t hree P M rou ndtrips by three buses . RTA route 205 (show n in green below) from Te mec ula to the Vill age at Ora nge is proposed to inc lude t wo A M and two P M ro undtrip s by 2 buses . Exi st ing RTA route 216 (show n in red below) from th e Riv erside Dow ntown Term ina l to th e Vil lage at Orange is planned for exp ansi on of se rvi ce from the current two buses to fo ur buses by Fisca l Year 20 23. Upon completion of the proposed 91 Express La nes , RCTC expects RTA to nearly doub le Express Bus service on SR-91 . Cu r rentl y, OCTA operates 15 bus trips per day on SR-91 and , based on ex pa nsion of r idership , RCTC env isions RTA add ing 20 add itiona l trips , eventually bring ing the to tal to 35 dai ly tri ps . Ser vice durat ion fo r thi s exp ansion will increase by 11 ,500 hou rs pe r year and will be se rved by five new RTA coaches to be procured spec ificall y for th is service , an d RTA wi ll add five more coaches by 20 17. Key Consi derations • Operati ng costs will average $5 ,000 ,000 each year and capit al costs w ill average $1,000,000 per year. The cost sha ri ng w ill be negot iated between Orange and Riverside count ies . RCTC is com mitti ng $5,000 ,000 pr ima ri ly fo r Express Bus purchases once the Rivers ide County portion of the 91 Express Lanes open . lntercounty Express Bus se rvi ce is effect iv e between locat io ns where tran sit travel t imes by Express Bus wou ld be mo re co mpeti t ive t han Met roli nk and connect ing ra il feede r b uses . There is so me duplicati on of se rvi ce be tween t he ex ist ing Express Bus routes and Met roli n k se rvice . O ne reaso n custome r s are attracted to Ex p res s Bus serv ice over Metroli nk is that the cost is app roxima tel y 33% low er. There may be some me ri t to subs idiz ing Metro lin k fa re s fo r pri ce-sensit ive t rans it r iders in th is co rrid or instead of keep in g co mpe ti tive bus se r vice . Benefits Deve lopment of Express Bus services w ill contribute to co ngestion rel ief on SR-9 1. Current Status A coope rative ag ree ment co verin g th e Riverside /Coro na to Sout h Coast Metro servi ce wi th Riverside Co unt y has been de velo ped . The Riv erside Coun ty to So uth Coast Metro Express Bus rou te is cu rrentl y op erating. Expansion of th e pro gram is depe ndent upon avail abl e ope rating fu nds and fu tu re fi nancial comm itments w it h Riv ersi de Count y. The imp lementation da tes ma y cha nge based on fun din g availab ility. FUL TON '% PLACENTIA Yorba Lln<la '0tba L 1nd• B lvd YORBA LINDA d:. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN " .. ,. E F0vu,,,1p._, 12 " " Metrolink Service and Station Improvements Project No: 3 Anticipated Completion: 2020 Project Cost Estimate* Anaheim Canyon Station Cost Placent ia Station Cost Total OCTA Costs Project Schedule To be completed by 2020 $ 21 ,000 ,000 $ 34 ,800 ,000 $ 55 ,800 ,000 * Costs from OCTA and based on projected start of construction Benefits Project Description The Anaheim Canyon Station improvement project includes the addition of a second track , platform, extensions of the ex isting platform , and assoc iated passenger amenit ies , including ticket vending machines. benches , canopies and signage . This project w ill improve the safety and on-time performance of Metrolink serv ice , as w ell as improved pedestrian circulation wi thin the station . OCTA is the lead on all phases of project development, including env ironmental. The proposed Placentia Metrolink Station will be a ne w station on the 91 /Perris Valley line. OCTA is the lead for des ign and construct ion of the projects . Key Considerations Coo rdination has been ongoing with the Metrolink extens ion stud ies for the Anaheim Canyon and Place.ntia Station Improvements . Enables development of expanded Metrolink service , improved efficiency, and fosters train ridership growth in the region which will contribute to congest ion relief on SR-91 . Current Status Preliminary plans and environmental clearance of the Anahe im Canyon Station projects w ere completed in ear ly 2017. Final plans , specifications and est im ates are expected to be completed in May 2019 . Construct ion for the Anaheim Canyon Station improvements should begin in fall 2019 . Plans for the new Placentia Station platforms , station amen ities . and parking are 95 percent complete . The plans are be in g revised to include a parking structure and are antic i pated to be complete and ready to bid in fall 2017. Construction is anticipated to begin in spr ing 2018. YORBA LINDA PLACENTIA THE CRO SSINGS (TRANSIT OREMTEO DEVELOPMENT) PAC1F1CENTER Image source: Anaheim Canyon Station Pro1ect Definition Report, February 23 , 2015 EXPANSK>N AR�A GE APPUANCE """ SERVICE ' FACI UTY r a. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 13 Project No: 4 Anticipated Completion: 2021 Project Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost $ 181 ,000 ,000 Project Schedule Prel iminary Engineering Envi ronmental Design /Construction Completed 2012-2018 2018-2021 * Assumes a 2-lane connecto r, extending as far as Coal Canyon . LEGEND -Ex ist ing Hi ghway -Interchange/Ramp -County Line • • • Coa l Canyon C ros sing ~ Toll ed Ex:press Lane -Existin g La ne -Propose d Improveme nt La ne ':_ ~ ~ Project #1 Im provements ", • I' ~-~ O n...-(;yps um Ca nyon Rd Off On Off SR-241/91 Express Connector Proje ct Desc r iption The SR-241/9 1 Ex press Connector w ill carry northbound (NB) SR-241 tra. to ea stbound (EB) 91 Express Lanes and carry w estbound (WB) 91 Expre Lanes t raffic to so uthbound (SB) SR-241 . Outside widening would be requi red on the sou th side of SR-91 for realignment of EB lanes up to the Coal Ca nyon Cros sing. Key Co nside rati ons This p roj ect was o r ig inally planned as a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) conn ecto r into th e SR-91 HOV lane. With the implementation of the 91 Expre ss Lan e s , t h e project w ill need to carefully coordinate the traffic operations a nd t o ll ing policies that w ill result w ith the convergence of the SR-24 1 Toll Road, the ex isting OCTA 91 Express Lanes , and the proposed extensio n of t he 9 1 Express Lanes by RCTC . The project will follow the SR-9 1 C IP (Proje ct #1 ) in its implementation and w ill need to be designed acco rdin g ly. Con ti nuous operations of the 91 Express Lanes w ill be a key cons id e ration for this proj ect. The prel iminary analysi s calls for the SR-91 cente r med ian to be w idened to the south to make room for a two lane (one in ea ch direct ion) di rect connector and associated Express Auxilliary Lanes in ea c h di rect io n . T he project w ould t ie into the SR-91 CIP improvements at Co al Canyo n Benefi t s The p roj ect w ill p rovide connectivity from the 91 Express Lanes and the SR-24 1 Easte rn Transportation Corridor System . The proj ect improves acce ss to SR -241 and South County for traffic that does not currently ut ilize the 9 1 Ex pre ss La nes, w hich also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need fo r HOV a nd Express Lane users to weave across four gener. purpose lane s to us e the ex isting SB SR-241 connector. It w ill he lp allevia cong esti o n th roug h the corr idor by allow ing SR-241 and 91 Express Lanes users to bypa ss th e existing 241 /91 genera l purpose connectors . Current Status Pre li minary engineering concepts for Cou nty Li ne Ingress /Egress la nes sho wn within Exp re ss Lanes a SR-241 /91 Express Lanes direct connector have been developed by The Foothill /Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and Caltrans. The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study w as comp leted in March 2009 and w as initiated to evaluate the various alternatives . A Project Study Report was initiated in January 2011 and was completed by January 2012 . The Draft Project Report and Draft Environmental Document w e r e completed in late-2016 , and the Final Project Report and Environmental Document is anticipated to be comp l eted in late-2017 . Final Engineering is underway and anticipated to be completed. mid-2018 . by re strip i ng (P roj e ct #1) a. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 14 " . Projects for implementation by 2030 include the interchange improvements at SR-71 /SR-91 , SR-91 widening improvements between SR-57 and SR-55 , and 1-15 /SR -9 1 North Direct Connector . The 2030 projects are at least partially funded and underway in various stages of project development. OCTA , RCTC , and Caltrans have initiated preliminary planning act ivities for these projects to ensure readiness when local , state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently , there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for impl ementation by 2030 are expected to cost approximately $650 million to $754 million (in 2017 dollars , or as noted). Project No. 5 6 7 Project Summary (Implementation Year) SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements (2023) SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 (2030) 1-15/SR-91 North Direct Connector (2030) SUBTOTAL Figure 2-3 -Summary of Projects for Implementation By 2030 Bernardino CHINO HILLS l l-....,. ' \ ' \ ' \ \ ' \ ' \ \ ' \ ~ " Cost ($M) 123.4 347 -450 180 650-754 J CORONA ~ < " a. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 Project No: 5 Anticipated Completion: 2023 Project Cost Estimate' Total Project Cost $ 123,397,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed Completed 2021-2023 • Cost obtained from preliminary engineer's cost estimate (2011 dollars) LEGEND -Existmg Highway -Interchange/Ramp -Countylme • • • Coal Canyon Crossmg A Tolled Express Lane -Existmg Lane -Proposed Improvement Lane -CO Road -Auxihary Lane ~ ~ ~ Proiect t! 1 and #4 Improvements • 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN • SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements Project Description The current project includes a new two-lane direct connector flyover from eastbound (EB) SR-91 to northbound (NB) SR-71 an.d modifications to the existing Green River Road EB SR-91 on-ramp. Key Considerations Project improvements must be coordinated with the following projects: the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) (Project #1 and #9) and the SR-241/91 Express Connector (Project #4). The Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement was completed in March 2009 (see Appendix B Project# B-1) and consisted of replacing the previously existing Green River Road Overcrossing with a new six-lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate widening of SR-91 by Projects #1, #4, and #9. The SR-91 CIP (Project #1, #9) project design-build team began construction activities in early 2014. The Project Report and Environmental Document for the SR-241/91 Express Connector (Project #4) is anticipated to be completed by late 2017. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife will also be required as the connector crosses the Santa Ana River below the Prado Dam. In addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three-level crossing of SR-91 and the proposed SR-71 direct flyover connector. Coordination will be required with an at-grade or grade-separated managed lane ingress/egress facility that may be located near the county boundary as part of the SR-91 CIP (Project #1, #9). Benefits The project will provide a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71, replacing the geometric choke point created by the existing connector. The project will also improve traffic operations and operational efficiency by eliminating or minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in June 2011. Final design was completed in 2015. Construction is deferred to 2021-2023 pending funding availability. Ingress/Egress lanes shown w1th1n the Express Lanes by restriping by Project #1 Lanes shown are for the SR-241/91 Express Connector Project #4 County Line • On Oii Auto Center Dr Serf as Club Or 16 • " " " SR-91 Improvements between SR-57 and SR-55 Project No: 6 Anticipated Completion: 2030 Project Cost Estimate* Tota l Project Cost , Low Total Project Cost , High Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction LEGEND -Exi sting Highway -Interchange /Ramp ~HOV Lane te. Tolled Express La ne -Existing Lane $ 347 ,000 ,000 $ 450 ,000 ,000 Completed Completed 2015-2019 2020-2022 2028-2030 ,, h l'i I r :r -Proposed Improvement La ne I' Interchange improvements at Kraemer Blvd/Glassel! St Project Description Improve the SR-57/SR-91 interchange complex , including local in ter- changes , and add ing capacity between SR-55 and SR-57. An improve- ment to NB SR-57 for an Orangethorpe Av Bypass was analyzed , but does not provide congestion relief to SR-91 ; the refore , is dropped from cons ider- ation . In add it ion , a drop on-ramp from Lakeview Av would be located between realig ned WB SR-91 lanes for direct access to SB SR-55. Specific im provements w ill be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation wi th local jurisdictions and affected communities . Improvements also include sp li tting the WB SR-91 Connector to SR-57 into separate exits and extend ing WB SR-91 lane additions through State College Blvd to connect wi th the au xil iary lane to Raymond Av-East St. The improvements for the Build Alternative include one EB GP lane from east of SR-57 to the SR-55 connector. One WB GP lane is added from NB SR-57 Connecto r through the State Co ll ege Blvd inte rchange . An additional option was considered for WB SR-91 that included SR-57 connector meter ing instead of the lane additions " from the SR-57 connectors ; howeve r, it did not rel ieve tra ffi c congestion and is not considered further. Key Considerations The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 m ay require right-of-way acqu isi ti on . A non-standard geometric cross-section w ill minim ize the amount of acquisitions . Benefits The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 be tween SR -57 and SR-55 include , among other fea tures , add ing one EB general purpose lane to achieve lane balancing . The project improvements wi ll reduce congest ion and de lay. Current Status The project improvement for EB SR-91 wi dening and for imp rovements to SR-57/SR-91 , Lakeview and SR-55/SR-9 1 w ere studied by the SR-91 Feasibility Study, w hich w as completed in June 2009 . Prel imin ary eng ineering w as comp leted in 2014 and the Environmental phase began in ear ly 2015 . The proposed improvements are included in t he Measure M2 prog ram t hrough the Environmental phase. Diverge for WB SR-9 1 and SB SR-55 Interchange improvements at Lakeview Av ~ SB SR-55 Dro p On-Ramp Lakeview Av SR-57 Kraemer Blvd SB SR -55 Off Off On Off On Off J Glassel! St Interchange improvements at Tustin Av On Off a. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17 Project No: 7 Anticipated Completion: By 2030 Project Cost Estimate" Total Pro1ect Cost $ 180,000,000 Project Schedule .. Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction 2018-2019 2018-2019 TBD •Cost from RCTC (2017 Dollars) LEGEND -Existino Highway -Interchange/Ramp ~ HOV or HOT Lane ..... ~ Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane -Proposed lmprn-vement Lane ':.._:. -=:.i Protect #1 and #5 Improvements Braided Connector 1-15/SR-91 North Direct Connector Project Description The Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAIED) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (GIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, included the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, the addition of collector-distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15/SR-91 interchange, the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 South, a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (North Direct Connector, the subject project), and the construction of one Express Lane in each dorecl!on from the 1-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-1 SICajalco Road (now part of RCTC 1-15 Express Lanes Project IELP]), and easterly to east of McKinley Street. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase (Project #1 ), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. Subsequently, the proposed 1-15/SR-91 median North Direct Connector improvements have been pulled out from the GIP as a standalone project to be implemented prior to the Ultimate GIP (Project #9). The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontano Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project with an anticipated completion date in 2020 Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project #1 ), the SR-71/SR-91 tnterchange (Pro1ect #4), the SR-241191 Express Lanes Conneclor (Project #3), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project Benefits The 1-15/SR-91 North Direct Connector project will reduce congestion and operational delays by providing direct median-to-median access between SR-91 and 1-15 Express Lanes. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of the direct connectors. The project will provide motorists a choice to use the Express Lanes Connector for a fee in exchange for time savings Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete as a component of the GIP pro1ect, but will be revisited at a future date as a standalone project. The Ultimate GIP Project, which includes the 1-15/SR-91 North Direct Connector, is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012 However, separate standalone environmental documentation will be prepared . Express lane extends to Green River R~ (Project #1) \ Auto Center Dr o~ I On Express Lines to 1-15/Hidden Valley Pkwy On From NB 1-15 McKinley St Pierce St Lanes shown are for the SR-71/SR-9"1 interchange east_} to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #5) \On Setfas Club Dr lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On-Ramp Express Lanes (~yl~g~~·j~J~0E~i) (Project #5) ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 18 • • • PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ • Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer-lead time projects and include a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard ; and the Ult imate SR-91 CIP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR-71 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15 . Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 8 9 Fairmont Boulevard Im provements (By 2035) Ultimate CIP : Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71 , and SR-91 Improve ments East of 1-15 (2035) SUBTOTAL • l . • D Figure 2-4 -Summary of Projects for Implementation by 2035 ''-Bernardino CHINO HILLS J CORONA 76.8 TBD 77+ .( {Co ., .,,. \ \ ,:. ..... ~ CF-.,u.,,, • a. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ,r r ,. \ 'I. \. 'I. \ 'I. '" \ \. 19 Project No: 8 Anticipated Completion: By 2035 Project Cost Estimate* Cap ital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Prel imin ary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 67 ,800 ,000 $ 9,000 ,000 $ 76 ,800 ,000 Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD * Costs from Feasibil ity Study (2 009 dollars t R/W cost is undetermined at this time . Cost does not inclu de potential im pact to Santa Ana Riv er. LEGEND -Existin g Hig hway -Inte rchan ge/Ramp r:JI) HOV or HOT Lane -Existin g La ne -Pro posed Im pro veme nt Lane On ,, I. ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Fa irmont Boulevard Improvements Proj ect Des c ript i on The proj ect wou ld prov ide a ne w interchange wi th SR-91 at Fai rm ont • Bou leva rd. On a nd off ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard from the no rt h to eas t bo un d (EB ) and w estbound (WB ) SR-91. The proposed inte rc hange doe s not include a vehicular Fairmont Boulevard connection to Sant a An a Ca ny on Road to the south . A pede st ria n /bic ycle connection is also proposed bet w een La Pa l ma Ave nue and Sant a Ana Canyon Road . This bridge and pathw ay will allow fo r dire ct Sa nta A na River Trail access from both Anahe im south of SR-91 and from Yor ba Li nd a . Key Co nsid erat i o ns Inte rc hange spac ing and weaving issues (to SR-55 ) need to be evaluated . W ideni ng of SR-9 1 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps. Proximity of the Sa nta Ana River may requ ire that the WB ramp junction be lo c ated north of the river. New connection requirements and inte rc ha nge spaci ng needs to be conside red . Ramp and bridge placement needs to take pe destrian /bicycle bridge into account , or incorporate the ped est rian/bike path into the design beyond the vehicular access limits of the p roj ect. Ben efit s The inte rcha nge is expected to re li eve congestion at Imperial Highw ay (SR -90 ), La kevi ew Avenue , and Weir Can yon Road Interchanges . Prelimi nary traffi c modeling show s a 10-15% decrease in volumes at Weir Can yon and SR-90 interchanges with the interchange alternative . Cur rent Sta t us The Ci ty of An a h e im completed a concept ua l eng ineering study in Dec e m ber 2009 for the interchange . Multiple a lternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual enginee ri ng study. Bicycle /pedestr ian br idge is cu r ren tl y in initia l planning stages. Project deve lopment is pen d in g fund ing identifi cat ion . OC TA is c u rre ntl y studying multiple conceptual a lternativ es for in te rmedi ate access to t he 91 Express Lanes . Alternatives may include differen t in gress and eg ress options near Fairmont Boulevard . Results of the ana ly s is were expected by the end of summe r 2016 . The Plan w ill be upd ate d as nece ssar y in the futu re wi th stud y results . Fairmont Blvd O ff On 20 • • " Project No: 9 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Project Cost Estimate" To Be Determined Project Schedule" Preliminary Engineering TBD Environmental TBD Design/Construction TBD Schedule for Ultimate Project anticipated by 2035 LEGEND -Ex1stmg Highway -lnlerchangelRamp -Countyltne " " " Coal Canyon Crossing ~ HOVlane ~ Tolled Express lane -Existing Lane -Proposed Improvement Lane -Auxihary Lane ~ --_J ~~~~~ ~P~o~e:i~nts Braided Connector Lanes shown are for the SR-241191 Express Connector (Project #4) ~ 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan " " Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction from SR-241 to SR-71, and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 Project Description The Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA/ED) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street. included the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, the addition of collector-distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15/SR-91 interchange, the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 South, a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (North Direct Connector, Project #7), and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-15/SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15/Cajalco Road (now part of RCTC 1-15 Express Lanes Project [ELP]), and easterly to east of McKinley Street. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase (Project #1 ), with reduced improvements. to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. The following is a summary of the proposed ultimate CIP improvements: SR-91 general purpose lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street: SR-91 general purpose lanes from SR-241 to Green River Road; and construction of one Express Lane in each direction from 1-15 to east of McKinley Street. Ultimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71. These Ultimate improvements are the subject of this project. The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lanes Project with an anticipated completion date in 2020. The SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (North Direct Connector) is now a separate project (Project #7), Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project #1 ), the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #5). the SR-241191 Express Connector (Project #4), SR-9111-15 North Direct Connector (Project #7), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lanes Project. Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street and along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete but may need to be revisited at a future date. The Ultimate Project is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012. Existing bike path will be preserved County Line Lanes shown are for the SR-71/SR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71. and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #5) Uttimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71 Express Lanes to 1-15/Hidden Valley Pkwy (Project #7) Auto Center Dr Maple St Lincoln Av Main St On Off \On Serfas Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On-Ramp (Project #5) OW " " " Off On ." " Off On On I J On Off ~ 3-Lane CD Road from Main St EB On-Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp (Project #1) Off On 0n� On" From From Main SB SI 1-15 Express Lanes lo 1-15/Cajalco Rd (by RCTC 1-15 ELP) McKinley St 21 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A-POST-2 0 3 5 A ND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS Concepts for potential Post-2035 implementation (pote ntia ll y ea rli er if funding becomes available) focus on longer-lead time • projects . This multi-billion dollar program may include: an elev ated 4-la ne facility (MIS Corr idor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 ; the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail; the Irvine-Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR -241 /SR-133to1-15 /Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corrid or B), WB SR-91 to SB SR -55 Connector Improvements , and EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 These po tenti al co nce pts include significant environmental cons traints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significa nt amoun t of planning , design , and future policy and public input. The MIS Corridor A concept may incorporate projects be ing develope d in the earlier programs as concept components . Appendix Concept Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) Concept No. A-1 El evated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241to 1-15 (Pos t-2035) 2,720 A-2 Anaheim to Ontario Int erna tiona l Airport Magle v Hi gh Spe ed Rai l (Post-2035) 2, 770 -3 ,200 A-3 Irvine-Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-L ane Facilit y fro m SR-241/SR-133 to 1-15 /Cajalco Road (Post-2035) 8,855 . FULL A-4 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improve me nts (Post-2 035) A-5 EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addi ti on at SR-241 SUBTOTAL Figure 3-1 -Summary of Conce pts for Post-2035 Implementat io n . ;; z TON PLACENTIA Placenna YORBA LINDA Bern ardino C HINO HILLS L, \. \ \. \ \ \ \. \ \. \ \. \ \ 75-150 31 14,451-14,956 _:CORONA ~ < " , ... l ,,.,," •.. ICEC-M~& To/From CS a: SR-241/SR-133 • • ~ 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22 " " Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 Concept No: A-1 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate** Cap ital Cost* $1,488 ,000 ,000 Support Cost (2 5%) $372 ,000 ,000 R/W Cost $860 ,000 ,000 Total Project Cost $2 ,720 ,000 ,000 Concept Schedule Conceptua l Enginee ri ng Prel iminary Engineering Environmenta l Design " Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD * Cap ita l costs include $160M for environmental mitigation excluding correspond ing support cost , w hich is incl uded in support cost estimate ** Costs derived from Riverside County - Orange County MIS , January 2006 (2005 dollars ) ~ Concept Description The improvements primari ly consist of constru ct i ng a new 4-lane elevated expressw ay near or wi th in the Santa Ana Canyon wi th free w ay-to-freeway connectors at SR-241 and 1-15 . The facility may include managed lanes and potential reversible operations . Key Considerations Choice of alignment wi ll be key to determ ining net capacity in crease. Extensive right-of-way (R/W) will be requ ired to implement the im provements if the alignment is not in the SR-91 corridor. When median connector projects or HOV/HOT projects are constructed and this 4-lane elevated facility is proposed wit hin the median of SR-91 through Co rona , then extensi ve managed lane closures would be required du ri ng construction (thus temporarily reducing SR-91 capacity during construction ). An alternative could be studied for the median Corridor A viaduct along wi th reduced SR-91 geometric standards to min i mize R/W impacts . Also , direct connectors (such as for High Occupancy Vehicle (H OV ) I High Occupancy Toll (HOT) at 1-15/SR-91 ) to/from the med ian could be precluded by Maglev columns located wi thin the same median area . Caltrans and Maglev highway R/W , maintenance , safety, and operations considerat ions would need to be ana lyzed if shared use wi th a Maglev facility were pursued. Additional mitigation costs may be required for improvements to SR-241 and SR-133 as a result of additional Corri dor traffic volumes. Corridor A as managed lanes , with the extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15 , this project concept may affect traffic dis tr ib- ution due to "parallel " tolled facilities . Benefits The concept w ould provide significant congestion relief by al lowin g vehicles to bypass the at-grade free w ay lanes and local arterial interchanges bet w een SR-241 and 1-15 . Connections are proposed d i rectly between SR-91 , SR-241 , and 1-15 . Current Status This concept is identified in the Riverside Shld 2 WB Lanes Me~ian 2 EB Lanes Sh ld County -Orange County Major Investment Study (M IS ) as part of the Loca lly Prefer red Strategy to improve mob ility between Rive rside Abbreviations: WB = Westbound EB = Eastbound County and Orange County. No project development work is planned at this time " Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A ) Cross-Section a. 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 23 Anaheim to Ontario Intern ation al Airport Maglev High Speed Rail Concept No: A-2 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Total Capital Cost , Low $ 2,770 ,000,000 Total Capital Cost , High $ 3 ,200 ,000 ,000 Concept Schedule To be determ ined • Concept costs from American Mag li ne Group (2 012 do ll ars ) Co ncept Des c ri ption Proposals for a new super-speed train corridor from Anaheim to Ontar i ~ are incl ud ed in thi s concept. This concept includes an a lternative th~ wo uld use SR-9 1 right-of-w ay , or w ould be aligned adjacent to SR-91 rig ht-of-way, or could potentially be co-located wi th the Major Investment Study (MIS ) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) a l ignment. Another al ignment op po rtu nity is bei ng investigated along SR-57 . Ke y Cons ider ati ons Al t ern ative ali g nment impacts to SR-91 right-of-w ay enve lope and /or Sa nt a An a Ri ver are undeterm ined . The choice of al ignment will poten ti a lly imp act MIS Corridor A (Concept #A-1 ). Right-of-w ay (R/W) will be req uired to implement the im prov ements . Potent ial considerations for co-locat ing t he Magnetic Levitation (M aglev ) tra in adjacent to Corridor A (an d also S R-91) include provid ing a two-column structure wi th a ba rri er be ee n the trains and vehicles. Ca ltrans and Maglev high w ay R/W, maintenance , safety , and operations considera ti o ns wo u ld need to be analyzed if shared use w ith a Mag lev facil ity were pursued . See the MIS Corridor A project for add iti onal con sid erations . Coord inat ion wi th Metrolink improvements will be required . Benefits The concept w ould provid e congestion re li ef by prov idi ng a dire ct high-speed /high-capacity connection wi th Ontario International Airport for Orange County a ir passenge rs and busin ess next-day de liv er ies . Maglev will make the trip i n just 14 .5 minutes. Re lieves congest ion on SR-91 by provid ing add ition al capacity in the corrido r. Current Status Preliminary design , engineering and Phases 1 and 2 of a Pre limina ry Environmental Impact Statement/Environmenta l Impact Statement (PEIS /EIS ) are comp leted . Congress has ap prove d $4 5 M in SAFETEA-LU fo r the environmenta l phase of th. project. The Anaheim to Ontario segment is included in th e "Con strained" Plan of the Southern California Association o Governments (SCAG ) Reg ional Transportation Plan (RTP ) pas sed in April 2012 . Construction funding of up to $7 billi on has been identified through a loan commitment from the Chin a Exp ort-Import Bank . LEGEND -Existi ng Highway -High Speed Rail Representative Al ign ment IOI•• .H COUM' ' ' ' ' ' SA.h ElEi. ..AA DltJC (0 I Y '',',,, ', ', ', ',, ', -- '.., ,, Pro ' .......... ', REPRESENTATI V E ALIGN MENT SHOW N FOR ILLUSTRATI V E PURPOSES ONLY ~ 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan • 24 " " " Irvine-Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241/SR-133 to 1-15/Cajalco Road Concept No: A-3 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate" Capital Cost $ 7 ,675 ,000 ,000 Support Cost $ 880 ,000 ,000 R/W Cost $ 300 ,000 ,000 Total Project Cost $ 8 ,855 ,000 ,000 Concept Schedule Geotechnical Feasibility Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construct ion Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD * Costs derived from the Feas ibility Evaluation Report (2 009 dollars ) LEGEND Existing Highway ~ ICE (Corrid or B) Re prese nt ative Alignment NOTE: REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY Concept Description The improvements primarily cons ist of construct ing a h igh w ay and rail facility through the Cleveland National Forest wi th free w ay-to-free w ay connectors at SR-241 /SR-133 and 1-15 /Cajalco Road . The facility w ould essentially be a cont inuation of SR-133 on the w est end of the corridor , to 1-15 on the east end . Key Considerations The tunnel concept is techn ica lly feas ible based on the geotechn ical invest igation completed in December 2009. The initial project phase would be the construction of one 2-lane high way tunnel and one rail tunne l. The second project phase w ould include construction of a second 2-lane highw ay tunnel. Add itional technical stud ies and geotechnical borings w ould be needed to refine the tunnel a li gnments and grades . Costs associated wi th the Irvine-Corona Expressway (I CE ) tunnels are based on the Feas ibility Evaluat ion Report comp leted in December 2009 . A financial analys is will be needed for the construction , operations and toll requirements of the ICE tunnels . Benefits The concept w ou ld prov ide sign ifican t congestion re li ef by providing an alternat ive route between Orange and Riv ers ide count ies and would all ow vehicles to bypass SR -9 1 be tween SR-241 and 1-15 . The concept w ould not disrupt SR -91 traffic during construction and would allo w for add itional route selection for incident management, emergency evacuation , and for continu it y of the high w ay network by linking SR -133 to 1-15 . Current Status On August 27 , 2010 the Riverside Orange Corr idor Authority Board took action to defe r add iti onal study of the ICE concept until such time as financ ial cons iderations improve and /or techno logical advancemen ts w arr ant reexam ination . Rev iew of the concept shall be done annua lly through the SR-91 Imple mentation Plan upda te to determine if any of the major assumptions wi th rega rd to financial considerations , private sector interest , or technological advancements have changed to make the tu nnel financially viab le. (See "ICE status summa ry " for further disc uss ion ). d:. 2017 SR-91 lmplementalion Plan 25 WB SR-91 to S B SR-55 Connector Improvements Concept No: A-4 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost , Low Total Project Cost , High Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 75 ,000 ,000 $ 150 ,000 ,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Note: Project costs derived from the SR-91 PSR/PDS between SR-57 and SR-55 (2014 Dollars ), and excludes support and R/W costs . Y:f{BA Lll~[lA P CENTIA ""--SR-55/SR-91 Conce pt Desc r iption • Th e project c o nsists of operational improvements by modifying th conn e ctor to S B SR-55 from WB SR-91 . The improvements would exten d to Lakeview Avenue to the east and would include a new conne ct or f rom WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 as a right-hand exit. Key Cons i derations Rig ht-of-wa y impacts , detailed SR-55 /SR-91 interchange improvements , an d d own strea m impacts to SR-55 require further eva l uation in a su bs e que nt p h ase of project development. Conceptual design of S R-55 /SR-91 would be coordinated w ith completed i mprovements at SR-91 an d Tu stin Avenue (Project #B-5), and with the SR-91 En viro nme ntal Study Improvements from SR-57 to SR-55 (Project #6 ). Th e stu dy fo r Project #6 is currently being conducted whi ch includes the S R-55/SR-91 i nterchange area , however, that project's objective is to pri ma ri ly im prove operations of the SR-91 betw een SR-55 and SR-57. O peration a l en hancements betw een SR-55 and Lakeview Avenue by Project #6 may provide some benefit for SR-55/SR-91 by addressing WB SR-91 we av ing issues . Ben efits Inte rc hang e im p rovements are antic ipated to provide congestion relief fo r SR-91 t raffi c and potent iall y improve the connect ion from WB SR-9 1 to SB SR-5 5 Cu r r e nt Status SR-55/SR-91 project information was derived from the Final Alternat iv~ Ev a lu ation and Refinement Report , December 2005 , by the Rivers idJm' Coun ty -O ra n ge County Major Investment Study (MIS). Focused SR -9 1/SR-55 c o nceptual engineering needs to be scheduled . Ho wever, in itial c onceptual engineering w as also studied as part of the SR-91 Fe a si bi lit y Study Betw een State Route 57 and State Route 55 Inte rc hang e Are as in June 2009 . ' I 1~1... HILLS \ \ VI LLA PAR K Interchange Improve ents \ • ~ 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 26 " " " Concept No: A-5 Anticipated Completion: TBD Concept Cost Estimate* Capital Cost $ 25 ,000 ,000 Support Cost (25 %) $ 6 ,250 ,000 RM/ Cost $ 0 Total Project Cost $ 31 ,250 ,000 Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Env ironmental Design " Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD *T hi s project cu rrently does not have an identified funding so urce (s ) for an y of t he project development phases ; ho wever, Dist rict 12 has ind icated th is is one of its top pri o rity projects . LEGEND I -Existing Highway ' -Inte rchange/Ramp A Tolled Exp ress Lane Ii: """"' -Existing Lane I:. : -Proposed Improvement La ne 11 ':_-:::_ -_J Project #3 Imp rovemen ts O n EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 Concept Description The location of the proposed EB SR-91 fifth general purpose (GP ) lane addition (The Segment ) is on EB SR-91 from We ir Canyon Road to the NB SR-241 Connector. The Segment cons ists of 4 (four ) GP lanes and 2 (two ) managed lanes (91 Express Lanes). Upstream (westerly ) from The Segment the EB SR-91 has 5 GP lanes and the 5th lane drops to the SB SR-241 Connector as some traffic vo lume ex its to the SB SR-241 . Dow nstream from The Segment the EB SR-9 1 ga ins the 5th lane back as the NB SR-241 Connector merges w it h SR -91 in a ded icated lane add ition. This 5th lane continues beyond the Riverside County line providing enhanced mob ility . Key Considerations Th is segment w ith 4 GP lanes might be creating a traffic choke point due to the decrease of capacity , potentially contributing to sign ificant traffic delays passing through this segment along with other traffic issues such as queue jumping , w eaving , me rging and operational speed differential. How ever, additional traffic from NB SR-241 to EB SR-91 and Gypsum Canyon Rd on-ramp suggest balanc ing the numbe r of lanes should be ca refully exam in ed . As such , add itional capacity w ill enhance EB freew ay operations along th is Segment. Benefits 1. Extends the ex isting 5th EB GP lane easterly and ties it to the ex isting 5th lane do wnstream . Th is could provide capacity enhancement and ma y result in removing an ex isting choke po int. Significant delay sav ings is anticipated . 2. Potentially el iminate queue jumping in this area from EB SR-91 as well as Weir Canyon Rd . 3. Potentially reduce speed differential be tween through lanes , thus creat ing a more balanced flo w . 4 . Potentially prov ide lane balance at high traffic demand area . " Gypsum Canyon Rd Off Off Current Status Addi ti onal t raffic anal ysis and stud y is requ ired to confi rm the benefits to EB SR-91 by the proposed improvements . This l ocat ion w as i dentified by Ca ltrans as a high congestion location in the County. The concept is intended to improve the choke po int that exi sts due to the presence of a 4 lane segment betw een 5 l ane f reeway segments . Th is project currently does not have an identified fund ing source for any of the project development phases ; how ever , th is concept is a District 12 top priorit y project. Lanes show n are for the SR-241 /91 Express Connector (Project #3) On 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 27 SECTION 4: APPENDIX B -C O MP L ETED PROJECT EXHIBITS The following exhibits represent completed projects fr om prev ious Pl ans since 2006 , and are intended to be used as a reference to illustrate the progress made sin ce the incep tio n of the Plan. Note: some projects listed in the Plan as completed (see Section 1, Project Accomplishments) are not includ ed herei n sin ce there was no exhibit created or necessary for use with prior Plans (such as for restriping projects , various safet y enhanc ements, minor operational im provements , etc .). Appendix Project Improvements Constructed Project No . 8-1 Green River Road Overcrossing Rep lace me nt March 2009 8-2 . North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parki ng Str ucture June 2009 8-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR -71 September 2010 8-4 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Ad ding a 51h GP Lane in Each Direction December 2012 8-5 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue April 2016 8-6 Metrolink Service Improvements June 2016 • • • ~ 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 28 " " " Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement Appendix Project No: B-1 Actual Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 21 ,000 ,000 Support Cost $ 3 ,000 ,000 R!W Cost $301 ,000 Total Project Cost $ 24 ,301 ,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmenta l Completed Design Completed Construction Completed Project Schedule Caltrans Equivalents: Preliminary Eng in eering = PIO Environmental = PA/ED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor Lane FTR =Future HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle SHLD = Shoulder 77' 138' Project Description Improvements primarily cons ist of replacing the existin g Green River Road ove rcrossing with a new six-lane wi de , 4-span overcrossing to accommodate future wi dening of SR-91 . The interior spans will accommodate up to eight mainline lanes in each direction including two HOV lanes . The exterior spans can accommodate two lanes , either for auxiliary lanes or collector distributor roads. Entrance and exit ramps w ill be realigned and wid ened to accommodate the new bridge, yet the in terchange will reta in its current configuration . New signals will be installed at the ramp intersections . Ramp and bridge improvements wi ll be constructed wi thin existing right of w ay. Key Considerations Design interface is required with the Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 , SR-7 1/SR -91 Interchange Improvements , SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project, and SR-241 /SR-91 HOV/HOT Connector. Benefits The project w ill improve the level of service at ramp and local street intersections at the interchange. Im provements will reduce ramp queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose lanes , thus contributing to congestion rel ief on SR-91 . Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and w as completed in March 2009 . 138' 79 ' --+~----t-=========/ New Bridge ' ; ' ls~!': i 1cr: 17 " I I '" WB " EB GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate ~ 2017 SR-91 lmplementalion Plan 29 North Main Street Corona M e t rolink Station Parking Structure Appendix Project No: B-2 Actual Completion: June 2009 Project Costs Cap ita l Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Tota l Proj ect Cost Project Schedule $ 20 ,000 ,000 $ 5 ,000 ,000 $0 $ 25 ,000 ,000 Prel iminary Engineering Completed Envi ronmental Design Construct ion PLACENTIA Comple ted Completed Completed YOOBALINDA d:. 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan Proj ect De s c r ip ti on The proj ect provides a six level parking structure with 1,065 park ing sta ll s. The co nstruction is wi th in the ex ist ing North Main St reet Metrol ink statio n property in Co rona . Ke y Co nsi d er at ions Proposed im prove ments were constructed wi th in exist ing right of way. Cu rrentl y there are 700 users of the facility, 200 more that were pre viousl y able to accomodate . Add itiona ll y RCTC has opened up the lot to park and ride carpoo ls and vanpools and has issued over 120 pe rmits fo r ca rpoolers to use the expanded station . Th is sho ws an ad ded ben efit of supporting carpoo li ng as w ell as transit to offset co ngesti on on S R-91 . Be nefits De mand fo r parking currently exceeds the capacity at the North Ma in Street Coro na st ation. Ne w pa rking capacity wi ll allow Metrolink ridersh ip to increase thereby divert ing vehicle tr ips from SR-91 . Cu r r e n t S t at u s Co nstructio n was initiated in January 2008 and was comp leted in June 20 09. T he proj ect was funded w ith Fede ral Congestion Management an d Ai r Qua lity (CMAQ ) funds . CHll HILLS NJRCO I fa I L ...,_ C'.ORCNA Metrol ink Park ing Structur\ ' ' ' ' 30 • • • Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 • • • Appendix Project No: B-3 Actual Completion: September 2010 Project Cost Estimate Cap ital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule " Preliminary Engineering Env ironmental Design Construction LEGEND -Existing Highway -Interchange/Ramp -County Line -HOV or HOT Lane -Existing Lane $ 41 ,000 ,000 $ 8,000 ,000 $ 2 ,200 ,000 $ 51 ,200 ,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed -Project Improvement Lane -Existi ng Interchange on ____-G ~off ....-----G ypsum Canyon Rd On Off Off On o~G -----on ~ 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan Project Description The proj ect wi ll prov ide an additional eastbound (EB ) lane from the SR -91 /SR-241 interchange to the SR-71 /SR-91 interchange and wi ll wi den all EB lanes and shoulders to standard wid ths . Key Considerations Coordination with the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (Project #3 and #11) wi ll be requ ired . Staged construct ion would be requ ire d fo r all ramp reconstruct ion and freeway wid ening . Freeway operations would most likely be affected by this project , however, free way lane closures are not anticipated. An EB concrete shoulder will be constructed wit h a 12 foot width to provide for f utu re wi dening as contemplated by Project #3 and #11. Benefits The lane addition w ould help to alleviate the weav ing cond ition between SR-241 and SR-71 , as well as remove vehicles from the SR-91 mainline that would be exiting at Green Riv er Road and SR-71 . Current Status Funding is from the Ame ri can Recovery and Re investment Act (ARRA) wi th $71.44M approved , and the balance of project costs are from other sources . Construction began in late 2009 and was completed in September 2010 . Coa l Canyon WLC County Line I --~~1~~~~~ • I • I I I I I • I I Green River Rd On Off On Off Off On Off On 31 Appendix Project No: 8-4 Actual Completion: January 2013 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 65 ,005 ,000 Support Cost $ 19,639 ,000 R/W Cost $ 573 ,000 Total Project Cost $ 85 ,217 ,000 Project Sc~edule Pre li minary Eng ineering Completed Environmental Completed Des ign Completed Construction Completed LEGEN D -Existing Hig hway -Intercha nge/Ramp -Existing Interchange ' -HOV or HOT Lane ,: ,, -Ex isting Lane -Project Improvemen t Lan e -Auxil ia ry Lane Lakev ie w Av Off On Off On Off W iden SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by A d ding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction Project Description This project pro pos es capacity and operational improvements by add ing one ge neral pu rp ose (GP ) lane on eastbound (EB ) SR-91 from the SR-55/ SR-9 1 con necto r to east of the Weir Canyon Road interchange and on w estbo und (WB ) SR-9 1 from just east of We ir Canyon Road interchange to the Im p e rial H ighw ay (SR-90 ) interchange . Add itionally , this project w ould f acil itate t ruck traffic approach ing the truck scales in both directions. Key Co n s i derat ion s Caltran s is not consi der ing relocat ion of the truck scales at this time . Benefits A lleviates cong e stion on WB SR-91 by e lim inating the lane drop at the t ruck scal e s an d provid ing a continuous GP lane to SR-90 . Alleviates congesti on on E B S R-91 by eliminating t he lane drop for northbound (NB ) S R-5 5 at S R-9 1 by providing an au x il iary lane to Lakeview Avenue , and at S R-90 by prov iding a continuous GP lane through Weir Canyon Constru ction w as co m pl eted in January 2013. The project rece ived $22M of Corrid o r Mo b il ity I mprovement Account (CMIA ) funding and $74M of State Tran spo rtati o n Improvement Program (ST IP ) Augmentation funds . • ~ypsum Truc k Scales Weir Canyon Rd on/ _C~nyon Rd On Off O n Off On Off ------------;__-~-" .. __ _ On Off On On Off Off Off--------._ G NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTIN GE NT U P O N IMPLEMENTAT ION OF THE PROJECT ~ 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan • • • 32 " " " Appendix Project No: B-5 Actual Completion: April 2016 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost R/W Cost Total Proj ect Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction LEGEND -Existin g Highway $ 22 ,218 ,000 $ 16 ,382 ,000 $ 4 ,682 ,000 $ 43 ,282 ,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed -Inte rchange/Ramp , -Co unty L in e ~H OV La ne ~ To ll ed Exp ress La ne -Existi ng La ne -Pro posed Im proveme nt Lane '" ' " ' On SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue Project Description The project w ill add a westbound (WB) auxiliary lane on SR-91 beg inning at the northbound (NB ) SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector th rough the Tustin Avenue interchange . This project includes approximately 1.1 lane miles . Key Considerations Build Alternative 3 was selected from the Project Study Report (PSR ), On Westbound (WB) SR-91 Auxiliary Lane from the Northbound (NB) SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange, and requires additional right-of-way . City of Anaheim utilities are w ithin close prox imity of the proposed w idening section . W idening of the Santa Ana River bridge is required . Coordination with the City of Anaheim occurred for widening of Tustin Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off-Ramp that w as completed in early 2011 . Benefits The project w ould reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers . Th is project wou ld also address choke-point conditions , w hich are caused primarily by extensive w eaving between the NB SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector and the WB SR-91 off-ramp to Tustin Avenue . Current Status Prel iminary engineering w as comp leted and approved by Caltrans . The environmental phase was completed in November 2010 , and design w as completed in mid-2013. Construction was initiated in February 2014. The project received $14M from the Proposition 18 State-Local Partnership Program (SLPP ), $14M from Measure M , wi th the ba lance from Regional Improvement Program (RIP ) funds. Contract acceptance and open to traffic in May 2016 . Tustin Av W B SR-9 1 T us ti n A v O n Off Off O n Lakeview Av O n Off 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 33 Appendix Project No: B-6 Actual Completion: 2016 Project Cost Estimate* IEOC Service Cost Perris Valley Line Cost Total Metrolink Costs Project Schedule Complete 2016 $1 ,160 ,000 $ 248 ,000 ,000 $ 249 ,160 ,000 • Costs from OCTA and RCTC (i n 2015 dollars ) Metrolink Service Improvements Projec t De s cri ption Orang e Co unty Transportation Authority (OCTA ) and the Riverside Co unty Tra nspo rtation Comm iss ion (RCTC ) are coordinating on the imple mentation of additional commute r rail servi ce on the Inl and Empire -Oran ge County (IEOC) Line , whi ch operates be tween Ocean si de and San Berna rdino . The ongoing success of the IEOC Lin e service an d significant freeway construction on para ll el corridors wo uld bolste r potential g rowth on Metrolink. Currently, there are sixtee n (16 ) da il y trains that run on the IEOC Line and nine (9) trains run ning on the 9 1 Line for a total of 25 daily tra ins . There will be an ad diti on al o IEOC roundtr ips by late 2015 . The long-term service imp ro veme nts w ill include 24 IEOC trains by 2030 . Co nstru ctio n began in October 2013 and w as opened to riders in ea rly in ea rly 2016 on the $248 ,300 ,000 Perris Valley Line (PV L), w hich w ill expand Metrolink commute r rai l service on the 91 Line (Ri versi de to Los Angeles , via Fu ll erton ). The new service will extend 24 miles from dow ntown Riverside to south Perris an d will add fou r new stations along the route . The PVL is expected to open to riders by December 2015 . The project is located wi th in th e right of w ay of the ex isting San Jacinto Branch Line th rough Riv erside , Moreno Vall ey and Perris . The PVL is th e fi rst extension of Metrolink service since the Antelope Vall ey Line was built in 1994 . The initia l schedule (Decem ber 201 5 ) has nine tra ins through to Los Angeles and 12 be tw een Perris and Riverside. Key Considerations • The long-term plan (by 2030 ) adds more service by co nstruct in g ad diti onal stat ions . The Ci ty of Anahe im is also propos ing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second trac k an d pl atform to be im plemented as part of the long-term plan . The City of Placentia is currently in the en vi ronment al phase for a ne w Metrol ink commuter rail passenger station and • parking lot to be constructed as part of the long-term plan . Benefits Enab les deve lopment of expanded Metrolink se rvice an d im prov es effic iency, w hich w ill contrib ute to congestion reli ef on SR-91 . Current Status Two add itiona l IEOC Line roundtrips were added in la te 2015 and nin e trains from th e exp anded PVL were added early 2016 . DAILY TRAIN S .. Existing . 25 2016 . 27 DAILY TRAINS Existing 16 2016.· 18 a. 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan Berna rdino CHINO HILLS I L-..._ \. '\, . ! CORONA \ \ ' \. \ ' \. \ NORCO . c J, • o., ./ '·· 34 • .SECTIONS: REF"ERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2017 Plan. Data was provided by OCTA, RCTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), other agencies and online resources. Measure M Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan), November 14, 2016 Riverside Transit Agency, Ten-Year Transit Network Plan, January 22, 2015 PSR-PDS on Route 91 Between SR-57 and SR-55, October 2014 PS&E for "Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange", 2014 PS&E for Initial SR-91 CIP Project, 2014 G,alifornia Transportation Commission, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), Amended December 2012 M2020 Plan (Measure M), September 2012 PSR-PDS for SR-241/SR-91 Connector, January 2012 Project Report and Environmental Document (EIR/EIS) for SR-91 CIP from SR-241 to Pierce Street Project, October 2012 PS&E "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2011 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report, August 2010 • Project Study Report/Project Report "Right of Way Relinquishment on Westbound State Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and Coal Canyon", May 2010 SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study, December 2009 Feasibility Evaluation Report for Irvine-Corona Expressway Tunnels, December 2009 Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR-241 to SR-71, May 2009 PSR "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR-55 Interchange and the SR-91/SR-241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 PSR/PR "On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Eastbound Direct On-Ramp (PM 16.4)", June 2008 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Riverside County-Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) -Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 California -Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, Anaheim-Ontario Segment; California-Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 .arious Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 A 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 35 ~ c en ro - (]J c.. ~ c 0 0 a:: . .i3 Q) 19 10 c +-' (]J V) E. ~ (]J ~-0 c.. NE - " " SR-91 Implementation Plan " Required by AB 1010 (Chapter 688, Statutes of 2002) and SB 1316 (Chapter 714, Statutes of 2008) " Updated annually to capture past, present and future projects along SR-91 o 1-15 to SR-57 " Plan not constrained by funding availability " Projects categorized by completion year (horizon years) o By 2021 o By 2030 o By 2035 SR-91 -State Route 91 1-15 -Interstate 15 SR-57 -State Route 57 ~'''''~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ('I') ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"'O QJ ......, (./) QJ > c -c 0 ·---·-~ 00 "' ~ -<.!). • (./) ......, u QJ ·~ 0 !ii- Cl.. x ·-V') • ~-- ~'''''~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • OJ c C'tJ .....J • "' ~ • Culmination of Efforts ( continuted) Benefits of Coordinated Efforts -Addresses population/traffic growth -Provides seamless connectivity between the counties -Increases travel options n *""~ '',,, -Improves quality of life D • • • " " By Year 2021 and 2030 " SR-71-State Route 71 SR-SS -State Route SS CIP -Corridor Improvement Project SR-241 -State Route 241 :;j Q~ c:: 0 <i N > >-UJ Ill ...J '-" ::::> VI 0 1-m z I-UJ z~ 0 UJ ~> c:: 0 -c:: <i a. u. ~ " " " Recommendation/Next Steps " Receive and file as an information item " Present Plan to RCTC in July " Provide approved Plan to State Legislature " Continue project implementation efforts Plan -SR-91 Implementation Plan RCTC -Riverside County Transportation Commission D " 7. I - V) ~ Q) Q) Q) s -0 c ·-Q) ~ > Q) Q) > V') ·-0::: t) I L... ·-V) u.. ~ I ro t: .....I 0 V) c. V) Q) ~ a::: c. V) x c UJ 0 ~ ·-CJ)~ L... Q) c. 0 " ~ 0 N " " Seven Week Highlights 93,936 Calls 49,588 Highest Traffic day " 2 Tota I Traffic and Potentia I Revenue 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,873,279 Actual Traffic ·press nes $3,758,595 $1,364,300 Projected Traffic Potential Revenue Projected Revenue • .3 " " Traffic by Direction Week 7 ____________________________ ,_..27,539 Week 6 Week 5 Week4 L--------------------......... .....-.-....................................................................... .__ ............... 12s,s 40, ~~~~ ________________________ ......... _____ 130,469. Week 3 -------------------------~------~--~--~3Dp3 Week 2 Week 1 ------------------------------------"L�3~JAq 20,000 Express Lanes 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 " Westbound Traffic " Eastbound Traffic " 140,000 160,000 4 QJ (./) :J -1--J c Q) E b.O QJ (./) ~ c: 0 ·-+" u ro ~ c: ro "'"' ..... u ..... u a: ~ c: 0 ·-+" u ro ~ c: ro "'"' ..... ~ u 0 Lf) • • UI UI UI f Q) ~ c " " Weekly Traffic HOV vs. SOV 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Week 1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week 5 Week 6 -Total SOV -Total HOV ~Projected Traffic Express Lanes " Week 7 6 1-15 and SR-91 Origin/Destination 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 1-15 NB press nes 60% SR-91 Westbound 67% 33% 1-15 SB SR-91 Eastbound • .7 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 • • Peak Period Traffic Average Westbound Weekdays 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM Express Lanes 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 • Average'Eastbound Weekdays 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8 91 Express Lanes Account Openings Weekl 937 Week2 747 Week3 657 ·--Week4 593 Weeks 603 ~ -Week6 585 ----Week7 367 ~ -Total 4,489 Before Opening After Opening \ • 200 • 64 91bf""l.J"" wmn«l«>nC.mr 1 lm.6009191 Kfo111d ploasmrum tJ> PQ9co9191 Conn~CA!ll878 ll!lumpO!t>;l'!Jl•• .. od [l =] \-m~ • . I ~~===------press nes ~ -• ·~ 2pe""" .• awpo<I 3 ... po~on • carpool Selbef<lnlmMng ~r::-.9 " " Ca 11 Center Statistics Self Serviced 39% Customer Service 11% Existing Accounts 27% Violations 16% New Accounts 7% " 10 Toll Rates • Commission adopted an Opening Toll Policy in September 2016 • Price per mile based on level of service volumes • Stantec projected estimated opening period volumes • Actual volumes have consistently exceeae projected volumes for many hours warranting toll rate increases • Weekly toll rate adjustments to manage eastbound peak period congestion ·press nes • .11 " " " CH P Toll Enforcement " Enforcement Targets " HOV 3+ violators " Vehicles without a transponder " Crossing channelizer " Two units during peak periods 12 Freeway Service Patrol Dedicated Express Lanes Service • Two Trucks • Initially 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. • Responding to Incidents and Disabled Vehicles press nes Responses 210 • .13 " " " Caltrans Express Lanes Maintenance " Sunday Closures (Every three weeks) " 4/2/17 " 4/23/17 " 5/21/17 " Debris removal, sweeping, channelizer replacement, drain clearing 14 Upcoming Items • Monthly reporting to SR-91 Advisory Committee to include RCTC • Evaluating Improvements • Eastbound 91/15 split • Westbound SR-91 entrance • Work with California Toll Operator Committee • Legislative Items • Technical Improvements • Statewide Marketing ·press nes • .15 V) ......, V) QJ :J C"' QJ 0:: !..... !ii.... 0 . :J u ~ +-' u !..... !ii.... 0 c c V) 0 0 l/) l/) c l/) l/) 0 0 0 !..... !..... ·-u . u ......, V) !..... !..... QJ ~ 0 ::l ·-~ a c en c ~ QJ 'r"i V) ~ I QJ LI) c 0 N ro -_J 'r"i V) LI) V) en -QJ !ii.... c.. x UJ M CJ)