Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout01.05.2016 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 5, 2016 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the December 15, 2015 Special Council Meeting B. Minutes of the December 15, 2015 Regular Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Swearing in Ceremony for Medina Police Officer Joshua McKinley B. Hennepin County Commissioner Jeff Johnson VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Bradford Creek Addition — Preliminary/Final Plat and Right -of -Way Vacation — 2872 Ardmore Avenue — Public Hearing B. Kal Point Site Plan Review and PUD Amendment — 340 Clydesdale Trail C. Just for Kix — Rezoning from UH-2 to CH -RR - 45 Highway 55 D. Woodland Hill Preserve Sign Variance — Public Hearing E. Resolution Establishing 2016 Appointments and Designations to Various City Services, Authorities, Commissions, and Agencies IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XII. POTENTIAL CLOSED SESSION: PARK LAND ACQUISITION: 4003 APACHE DRIVE XIII. ADJOURN Posted 12/31/2015 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: December 30, 2015 DATE OF MEETING: January 5, 2016 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Swearing in Ceremony for Medina Police Officer Joshua McKinley — Officer McKinley began employment with the City of Medina on November 16, 2015. He will be present at the January 5th meeting for a swearing in Ceremony. No attachments for this item. B. Hennepin County Commissioner Jeff Johnson — Commissioner Johnson will be at the meeting to provide the City Council with an update. No attachments for this item. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Bradford Creek Addition — Prelim/Final Plat and ROW Vacation - 2872 Ardmore Avenue — Public Hearing — Susan Prodahl has requested approval to replat eight existing substandard lots in the Independence Beach neighborhood into two lots. The applicant has also requested that the City vacate half of the Palm Street right-of-way to the north of the subject site. No improvements currently exist in the right-of-way. This vacated right- of-way is proposed to be incorporated into the lots within the plat. See attached report. Recommended Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare resolutions approving the Bradford Creek Addition plat and the requested vacation of Palm Street based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. B. Kal Point PUD/Site Plan Review — Kalyan Vempaty proposes to construct a restaurant with a second story office at 340 Clydesdale Trail. The proposal would require the following land use approvals in order to permit the construction proposed by the applicant: 1) PUD General Plan — the subject site is part of the Clydesdale Marketplace PUD, and the proposed construction differs from that approved, requiring an amendment to the PUD. 2) Site Plan Review for construction of a new commercial building. See attached report Recommended Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the Kal Point PUD and site plan based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. C. Just for Kix — Rezoning from UH-2 to CH -RR — 45 Highway 55 — Just for Kix has requested a rezoning of property at 45 Highway 55, located east of the Aldi site, to the southeast of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive. The property is currently zoned Uptown Hamel-2 and the applicant has requested that the property be rezoned to Commercial Highway -Railroad, consistent with the Aldi property and the properties to the west of Sioux Drive. The applicant has requested the rezoning in anticipation of purchasing the property and making an application to construct their facility on the subject site. See attached report. Recommended Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare an ordinance rezoning the property at 45 Highway 55 to Commercial -Highway Railroad with the condition recommended by the Planning Commission. D. Woodland Hi11 Preserve Sign Variance — Woodland Hill Preserve, Inc. has made an application for a variance to allow for their monument sign to be placed within the setback. Initially the sign was to be placed on the west side of Woodland Hill Court. The applicant would like to move the sign to the east side and reduce the required setbacks. The proposed location of the sign is on an unaddressed property located to the north of 694 Aster Road. See attached report. Potential Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the variance request because it is not consistent with the variance review criteria. OR Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the requested side yard setback variance and denying the variance request because it is not consistent with the variance review criteria. E. Resolution Establishing 2016 Appointments and Designations to Various City Services, Authorities, Commissions, and Agencies - Staff is seeking Council discussion of the attached annual appointments list. The Planning Commission has two openings and received two applications. Interviews will take place on January 5th. The Park Commission has two openings and received one applicant. The other seat will remain open until filled. Information will be provided to the Council at the meeting. See attached resolution. 2 Recommended Motion: To approve the resolution establishing 2016 appointments and designations to various City services, authorities, commissions and agencies. XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003455E-003480E for $97, 746.54, order check numbers 43760-43835 for $170,377.45, payroll EFT 506848-506901 for $94, 732.35 and payroll check number 020434 for $97.14. XII. POTENTIAL CLOSED SESSION: PARK LAND ACQUISITION: 4003 APACHE DRIVE INFORMATION PACKET • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List See attached closed session memo. 3 CONCURRENT MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION. MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 15, 2015 The City Council and Planning Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in concurrent session on December 15, 2015 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Mayor Bob Mitchell presided. I. Call to Order: 6:00 p.m. Members present: City Council: Mitchell, Anderson, Pederson, Martin, Cousineau Planning Commission: Reid, Albers, Foote, White, Williams Members absent: Planning Commission: Murrin and Nolan Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Planner Dusty Finke, and Eric Zweber WSB. II. Update on Comprehensive Plan Mitchell and Reid called the meeting to order. Staff provided general information about the process the City intends to follow related to the decennial Comprehensive Plan Update. Staff presented the draft Vision Statement put together by the Steering Committee and requested input from the City Council and Planning Commission. Staff will incorporate the comments and present back to the Steering Committee. III. Adjournment: The general consensus was to adjourn at 6:58 p.m. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Scott Johnson, City Administrator -Clerk Concurrent Meeting Minutes December 15, 2015 Concurrent Meeting Minutes December 15, 2015 1 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 15, 2015 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on December 15, 2015 at 6 7:05 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Tom Kellogg, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Police 16 Sergeant Jason Nelson, and Recording Secretary Amanda Staple. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:06 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:07 p.m.) 21 Johnson requested to add an item to the agenda titled Raffle Permit for Ridgeview 22 Foundation. 23 24 The agenda was approved as amended. 25 26 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:07 p.m.) 27 28 A. Approval of the December 1, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 29 It was noted on page three, line nine, it should state, "...honed, ..." On page four, line 30 seven, it should state, "...20161 ..." 31 32 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the December 1, 2015 regular 33 City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 34 35 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:08 p.m.) 36 37 A. Approve 2016 Meeting Calendar 38 B. Approve Addendum to Recording Secretary Service Agreement 39 C. Amend Personnel Policy 4.20 Salaries and Wages 40 D. Resolution No. 2015-106 Accepting Watermain Improvements at 190 41 Westfalen Trail 42 E. Resolution No. 2015-107 Accepting Resignation of Clark Palmer 43 F. Approve Associate Planner Job Description and Reclassification of Debra 44 Peterson to Associate Planner 45 Johnson advised of an additional meeting at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 19, 2016 for 46 the purpose of goal setting. 47 48 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 49 passed unanimously. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 December 15, 2015 I VI. COMMENTS (7:10 p.m.) 2 3 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 4 There were none. 5 6 B. Park Commission 7 Scherer reported that the Park Commission will meet the following night to discuss the 8 replacement of a scoreboard, which he believed would be almost fully funded by the 9 Lions. He stated that some contact has been made with a willing seller adjacent to 10 Tomann Park and noted that further direction would be requested at the next Council 11 meeting. 12 13 C. Planning Commission 14 Planning Commissioner White provided an update on the December 8t" Planning 15 Commission meeting which included a review of the Bradford Creek Addition which 16 would plat eight nonconforming lots into two conforming lots, noting that the Commission 17 recommended approval of the request. She stated that the Commission also considered 18 a Planned Unit Development for Kal Point for the construction of a restaurant and office 19 at Clydesdale Marketplace and advised that after much discussion, specifically regarding 20 parking, the Commission recommended approval. She advised that the Commission 21 considered a rezoning request for the property located at 45 State Highway 55 and 22 recommended approval of the rezoning. She stated that the Commission considered a 23 variance request from Woodland Hill Preserve for their monument sign and noted that 24 the Commission did not recommend approval of the variance for the front yard setback 25 but would support the variance from the side yard setback. 26 27 Mitchell urged the Council to look at the parking lot easterly to the restaurant site to 28 determine the use during this high holiday peak time to determine if there is excess 29 parking. 30 31 VII. NEW BUSINESS 32 33 A. Sioux Drive Turn Lane improvement Project — Public Hearing. (7:15 p.m.) 34 Johnson stated that at the November 17tt' Council meeting there was discussion on 35 whether or not to potentially include the Arnt property (45 Highway 55) with the 36 assessment for this project. He stated that in order to add the property to the project 37 that a public hearing would be required and the direction of the Council was to hold the 38 public hearing. 39 40 Mitchell opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. 41 42 Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, stated that he attended many meetings 43 during the Aldi process on the part of Aldi and is also representing the Arnt property. He 44 stated that on July 20t" there was an assessment agreement between the City, Aldi and 45 Hamel Station and it does not state that the Arnt property would be included in the 46 assessment even though that property would have future development. He stated that 47 when he represented the Arnt property to the future buyer he presented this information 48 to the potential buyer regarding the assessment and how it would be split. He stated 49 that the potential buyer is not expecting to receive any expenses on the project. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 December 15, 2015 1 Jim Tiller, Treasurer of the Arnt Property LLC, stated that the Aldi easement does not 2 take effect until the Arnt property is developed and noted that there is currently a chain 3 link fence that blocks that access. He stated that the buyer would need to file 4 applications to develop in both Medina and Plymouth and there is no certainty that either 5 or both of those approvals would be gained. He noted that the Arnt property currently 6 has access from Highway 55 and does not use the easement access. He stated that the 7 Arnt property is trading one access for the other when the property develops and 8 therefore would not benefit from the improvement. He stated that there is not an 9 easement that would benefit the Arnt property at this time as the easement does not 10 become effective until the property is developed. He stated that if Just for Kix is not 11 developed for any reason there would not be a benefit at all provided to the Arnt 12 property. He stated that Aldi assumed the assessment cost as a part of their 13 development and that should stand. 14 15 Perry Platisha, First Equity Real Estate, stated that it is their understanding that the 16 assessment would not come into play. He noted that they are still in the due diligence 17 stage of the purchase agreement and that would be a significant cost that could tip the 18 scales towards not purchasing the property. 19 20 Martin asked the intended use of the property. 21 22 Platisha stated that Just for Kix is a dance studio for children. 23 24 Martin asked if the intent would be to use the easement if the property is developed. 25 26 Platisha stated that would be the only access into the property if the Highway 55 access 27 is closed. 28 29 Martin asked if the improved turn lane would benefit the property. 30 31 Platisha stated that it is beneficial but it was not an assumed cost for the buyer. 32 33 Martin asked if there was an agreement with the Arnt property/potential buyer and the 34 City regarding the assessment. 35 36 Platisha stated that the agreement stated that there were no pending assessments and 37 agreed that there was not an agreement with the City regarding the assessment. He 38 stated that the business is currently operating in a leased space in Medina. 39 40 Mitchell closed the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. 41 42 Mitchell stated that the cost of the project appears to be $219,000 and asked what the 43 Arnt share of the project might be. 44 45 Johnson estimated somewhere around $40,000 roughly. 46 47 Anderson asked if cars exiting from the Aldi site would be able to turn left to go south. 48 49 Kellogg confirmed that action would be possible. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 December 15, 2015 1 Mitchell stated that it was realized that the improvements would benefit the Arnt property 2 and the City is entitled to have another assessment hearing to include the property as it 3 was not included in the past. He explained that it would be unfair to the other property 4 owners that the Arnt property would also benefit but would not contribute towards the 5 project. He noted that he heard the comments that were made from those with interest 6 in the Arnt property as well. 7 8 Batty clarified that the hearing tonight was simply for the improvement and not the 9 special assessment, which will occur in the fall. He stated that this was originally done in 10 October but only included those with petition and waiver agreements. He explained that 11 when this property presented itself by requesting a rezoning and indicating their intent to 12 develop the issue was re-examined. He stated that if this property is eventually to be 13 included with the proposed project, then the public hearing would be required. He stated 14 that the proposal is to approve the project, construct the project, and after the costs have 15 been determined after construction the special assessment hearing would be held and 16 the decision regarding assessments would be made. 17 18 Mitchell asked when the assessment would be considered pending. 19 20 Batty stated that the assessment would only be pending after the assessment hearing in 21 the fall. 22 23 Cousineau asked if any other tenant of the property has been offered a petition and 24 waiver. 25 26 Batty stated that they could choose that course but they have not as of yet. 27 28 1. Resolution No. 2015-108 Receiving the Amended Feasibility Report 29 for the 2016 Sioux Drive Turn Lane Improvement Project and 30 Ordering the Improvement 31 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Resolution No. 2015-108 Receiving 32 the Amended Feasibility Report for the 2016 Sioux Drive Turn Lane Improvement 33 Project and Ordering the Project. Motion passed unanimously. 34 35 B. Conservation Easement Tax Valuation Discussion (7:33 p.m.) 36 Johnson stated that at the December 1st meeting a request was brought forward by 37 Mitchell from former Mayor Weir asking for a letter of support to amend a State Statute 38 regarding tax valuation of conservation easements. 39 40 Finke stated that staff did look through the statutory language and advised that previous 41 to 2013 the statute was opposite and allowed for a City or County assessor to take into 42 account the easement, noting that was reversed in 2013. He stated that the question 43 would be the effect on a community such as Medina that wants to encourage property 44 owners to place property into conservation although the assessor cannot consider that 45 when valuing the property. He explained that property placed into an outlot, such as 46 conservation easements are in Medina, is not considered taxable and therefore there 47 would not be an impact. 48 49 Martin stated that if she owned a 40 acre tract of land she wished to plat her property 50 into two lots, placing the majority of her property into an outlot, would she then not be 51 taxed on the outlot. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 December 15, 2015 1 2 Finke stated that the outlot must be considered as a common use area for a 3 development or subdivision. 4 5 Martin stated that she would like to hear from the assessor as to whether or not the 6 assessor is free to reduce the value of the property for other reasons, such as wetlands. 7 She stated that she would like to explore the issue further as the Council would like to 8 support preservation of open space and she would be willing to support that person in a 9 lesser valuation of their property if a conservation easement is contained. She 10 appreciated this issue would be brought forward to the legislators for this area. 11 12 Mitchell stated that he received a number of telephone calls on this issue and he also 13 spoke with assessors in this area. He provided a local example and noted that the 14 specific property was already valued lower because it was considered under green acres 15 and therefore could not "double dip" in lowered valuations. 16 17 Batty stated that the statute has done a 180 in the past eight years, which was explicitly 18 at the direction of northern Minnesota legislators, with concern about double dipping in 19 lowered valuations and was the directing force behind this change. 20 21 Mitchell stated that perhaps staff could speak with someone from the Minnesota Land 22 Trust and the Nature Conservancy. He believed that this item should come back before 23 the Council in the near future once staff has sufficient time to complete further research. 24 25 Cousineau stated that it would be helpful to tag along with a lobbyist or along with 26 Minnesota Land Trust rather than going it alone as one city. 27 28 Elizabeth Weir, 1262 Hunter Drive, stated that she became acutely aware of this 29 because of the proximity of her land to the Dayton property. She stated that her 30 neighbor offered to purchase nine acres of the Dayton property in order to further buffer 31 and preserve his property, noting that the neighbor has sufficient funds to purchase the 32 property but not to pay the additional taxes. She noted that the preserved areas have 33 many benefits to the environment and community in general. She stated that she will 34 continue to act on this issue personally but would also appreciate the support of the 35 Council. 36 37 Mitchell agreed that the City should partner with larger organizations that would have an 38 interest in this matter as well. 39 40 Martin appreciated the suggestions that Weir continues to make to the City. 41 42 C. Raffle Permit Request for Ridgeview Foundation (7:54 p.m.) 43 Johnson noted that this item was received today through the mail for a February 5, 2016 44 permit at the Medina Entertainment Center. Normally, this item would be acted on 45 during the Consent Agenda. However, approval at the January 5th meeting would not 46 allow enough time for State review. 47 48 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to approve a raffle permit for Ridgeview 49 Foundation on February 5, 2016 at the Medina Entertainment Center. Motion passed 50 unanimously. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 December 15, 2015 1 VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:50 p.m.) 2 3 A. Hamel Volunteer Fire Department Contract Change Request 4 Mitchell referenced a letter he received from Tom Manning along with a redline contract 5 which is being reviewed by Johnson, Belland and Batty along with the other fire 6 contracts. He noted that additional updates would be made once available. 7 8 Martin stated that there is a schedule of equipment owned and asked that it be included 9 along with comparison information for the other departments. 10 11 B. City Hall Office Improvements 12 Johnson provided an update on the improvements occurring in the lower level of City 13 Hall through use of the Public Works staff. Johnson thanked the Public Works staff for 14 their work on the project. He noted that three quotes were received and asked for 15 authorization from the Council to work with the lowest quote from an owner's 16 representative at an hourly rate to bring in an architect for the project. It was the 17 consensus of Council that staff moves forward with the process for the improvements. 18 Contracts for an architect and owner's representative will be brought forward for Council 19 to review and approve in January. 20 21 C. Other 22 Johnson stated that with Clark Palmer leaving his position there is a vacant position in 23 the Planning Department. 24 25 Finke stated that Clark was going to work to transfer data into the new electronic filing 26 system, which would require pulling staples from the paperwork. He proposed to look 27 for a high school student to pull staples over the holiday break to prepare the documents 28 to load into the new electronic system as that would be very cost effective. 29 30 It was the consensus of the Council to authorize staff to proceed with the hiring of high 31 school students to complete the necessary work. 32 33 IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:00 p.m.) 34 Martin commented on a business networking event she attended at Countryside Cafe 35 with Interfaith Outreach, which was a successful event. 36 37 X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:01 p.m.) 38 Moved by Martin, seconded by Anderson, to approve the bills, EFT 003433E-003454E 39 for $46, 396.90, order check numbers 043692-43759 for $448, 073.15 and payroll EFT 40 506816-506847 for $51,177.81. Motion passed unanimously. 41 42 Xl. ADJOURN 43 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Martin, to adjourn the meeting at 8:01 p.m. Motion 44 passed unanimously. 45 46 47 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 48 Attest: 49 50 51 Scott Johnson, City Administrator Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 December 15, 2015 Agenda Item # 8A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: December 28, 2015 MEETING: January 5, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Bradford Creek Addition — Prelim/Final Plat and ROW Vacation - 2872 Ardmore Avenue — Public Hearing Review Deadline 120-day Review Deadline: March 3, 2016 Summary of Request Susan Prodahl has requested approval to replat eight existing substandard lots in the Independence Beach neighborhood into two lots. The applicant has also requested that the City vacate half of the Palm Street right-of-way to the north of the subject site. No improvements currently exist in the right-of-way. This vacated right-of-way is proposed to be incorporated into the lots within the plat. The subject site is currently vacant. A single-family home and detached garage had been located on the subject site, but have recently been demolished. The structures straddled the various property lines of the eight lots and the site had been generally treated as a single site. There are a fair amount of significant trees on the subject site. The property generally slopes up from Ardmore Avenue to the center of the property and down to the rear of the property. Lake Ardmore is located north of the Palm Street right-of-way. The property is zoned Urban Residential, the same as all surrounding property. The property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District of both Lake Ardmore and Lake Independence, but does not have frontage on either waterbody. An aerial of the site can be found at the top of the following page. This aerial shows the structures prior to demolition. The dashed line identifies the proposed property line between the two proposed lots. Requested Right-of-way Vacation The applicant requests that the City vacate the southern half of Palm Street to the north of the subject site. The applicant proposes that the 30 feet of property be added to the lots through the platting process. According to Minnesota Statutes 412.851, "The council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, public way, or any part thereof, on its own motion or on petition of a majority of the owners of land abutting on the street, alley, public grounds, public way, or part thereof to be vacated. When there has been no petition, the resolution may be adopted only by a Bradford Creek Addition Page 1 of 5 January 5, 2016 Plat and Right-of-way Vacation City Council Meeting vote of four -fifths of all members of the council. No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a hearing preceded by two weeks' published and posted notice." There is no street within the right-of-way, but it was platted in a grid pattern in Independence Beach back in the 1920's. In addition to streets, public rights -of -way can be used for utilities, storm water improvements for streets, and similar uses. Although there are currently no street improvements in the right-of-way, the right-of-way does provide legal access to property which the City has received through tax forfeiture to the north. Staff believes that the potential uses of the right-of-way could be accomplished in the northern 30 feet of right-of-way. Therefore, staff does not oppose the requested vacation. The Planning Commission, although they do not hold a hearing on right-of-way vacation requests, also did not have concerns with the proposed vacation. Bradford Creek Addition Page 2 of 5 January 5, 2016 Plat and Right-of-way Vacation City Council Meeting Proposed Plat The applicant proposes to plat the property into two lots. The lots would receive access via existing Ardmore Avenue, the adjacent local street. Essentially, the applicant proposes to split the subject site in half. Following is a summary of the lot area and dimensional standards of the UR zoning district and shoreland overlay district in comparison to the proposed lots. Requirement Lot 1 Lot 2 Min. Lot Size 15,000 s.f. (Shoreland) 9,000 s.£ (UR) 25,536 s.f. 25,497 s.f. Min. Lot Width 75 feet (Shoreland) 60 feet (UR) 120 feet 117.84 feet Min. Lot Depth 100 feet 232.75 feet 231.27 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Setback from "Brook Avenue" (east) 30 feet N/A 30 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard Setback 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Lake Setback 75 feet N/A (north of site) N/A (north of site) Impervious Surfaces 25% (Shoreland) 19% (conceptual) 19% (conceptual) The proposed lots appear to meet all dimensional standards of the UR and Shoreland Overlay District. Lots in the shoreland overlay district are limited to 25% hardcover. The applicant has shown that a fairly large building envelope could meet this requirement along with a driveway. Staff believes the estimate for the driveway hardcover is a bit low, but the driveway could be doubled in size and still result in less than 25% hardcover. Streets and Transportation The lots are proposed to have driveway access onto Ardmore Avenue. The street is a slow - traffic local roadway and the proposed access does not cause concern. Ardmore Avenue is approximately 22 feet in width with a right-of-way of 40 feet. Both of these are below current standards. The applicant proposes to dedicate an additional 7.5 feet of right-of-way for Ardmore Avenue. This would be equivalent to 25-feet from the centerline of Ardmore Avenue if the street were widened to current standards of 28 feet. The City Engineer recommends 10 feet of right-of-way instead of 7.5 feet since the street is currently includes a shallow ditch. Wetlands and Floodplains There are no wetlands located on the subject site. The wetland adjacent to Lake Ardmore is far enough north that adequate space exists for upland buffers. The 1% chance flood elevation of Lake Ardmore is 962, which is located north of the subject site. City regulations require the lowest floor elevation to be above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (which is 1.5 feet above the 1 % elevation). This will be reviewed upon building permit application, but the conceptual grading plans show the basement floors will likely be more than 8 feet above the flood elevation. Bradford Creek Addition Page 3 of 5 January 5, 2016 Plat and Right-of-way Vacation City Council Meeting Tree Preservation There are 54 significant trees located on Lot 1 and 59 significant trees located on Lot 2. The City's Tree Preservation ordinance would require replacement if more than 15% of the significant trees are removed for initial site development or if 20% of the significant trees are removed for other activities. It appears that 3 trees will be removed for the initial site development of utilities on Lot 1. The applicant has submitted a conceptual grading plan which shows that approximately 32% of the trees are proposed to be removed from Lot 1 and 20% of the trees proposed to be removed on Lot 2. These totals may differ when a buyer proposes a specific house plan for each lot. Staff recommends a condition be added to the resolution and development agreement stating that house construction will be subject to replacement requirements if more than 20% of the trees are removed. Utilities/Easements The applicant proposes to utilize existing sewer/water services for Lot 2. The applicant will need install services for Lot 1 which will entail reconstructing a portion of the street after installation. Staff recommends a development agreement and letter of credit for these improvements. Lot 1 will be subject to sewer and water connection fees when the services are installed. The applicant proposes standard drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the lot. The City Engineer has not identified the need for additional easements. Stormwater Management The City's stormwater management regulations are triggered by the subdivision of property. In this case, the applicant is combining substandard lots which results in a decrease of lots. The City has determined in previous situations that stormwater improvements are not triggered. As noted above, the maximum hardcover permitted within the shoreland overlay district is 25%, which is intended to help limit stormwater impacts. Park Dedication The plat does not result in a net increase in the number of lots, so park dedication is not required. As mentioned previously, the City owns a good deal of property adjacent to Lake Ardmore as a result of tax forfeiture. The property is held as a passive nature area and there are no proposed improvements for the area. Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation According to Subd. 10 of Section 820.21, "the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following finding are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. Bradford Creek Addition Page 4 of 5 January 5, 2016 Plat and Right-of-way Vacation City Council Meeting (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (0 That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way." As noted above, the City Council should first hold a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the southern half of the Palm Street right-of-way. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed plat at their December 8 meeting. An excerpt from the minutes is attached for reference. Following the hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the right-of-way vacation and plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the plat is contingent upon the City vacating the portion of the Palm Street right-of-way indicated on the plat. 2. The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City to ensure compliance with the conditions noted herein as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance and policy. 3. The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit to ensure completion of the utility service construction and street reconstruction necessitated by construction. 4. Construction on the lots shall be subject to the City's tree preservation ordinance Current regulations require replacement for any removal in excess of 20%. 5. The Applicant shall update the plat in order to dedicate 10 feet of right-of-way for Ardmore Avenue. 6. The Applicant shall pay relevant sewer and water connection fees for the new proposed connection for Lot 2. 7. The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the proposed vacation and plat and for the review and creation of other relevant documents. Potential Motion If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the Bradford Creek Addition plat based upon the findings noted in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Planning Commission minutes 2. Document List 3. Engineer Comments 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Final Plat Bradford Creek Addition Page 5 of 5 January 5, 2016 Plat and Right-of-way Vacation City Council Meeting Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Bradford Creek Addition — Preliminary/Final Plat to Plat Property into Two Lots (2872 Ardmore Avenue) — Public Hearing Finke presented a request for a Preliminary Plat, noting that the request also includes Final Plat and vacation of right-of-way but advised that those approvals go before the City Council and therefore the Commission will only consider the Preliminary Plat. He stated that this request would reconfigure eight substandard lots into two conforming lots. He noted that the right-of- way requested to be vacated would be divided into the two lots. He advised that historically there had been one single-family home on the eight substandard lots and provided additional details on the lots and zoning. He stated that the eight lots would be split in half, divided equally into two lots. He stated that a conceptual grading plan has been provided to demonstrate how a building pad for the homes could fit into the property. He stated that there are no existing improvements in the right-of-way requested to be vacated. He explained that even though the Council will hold the hearing and make the decision on that request, the item is included in the Preliminary Plat because the land would be combined with the two lots. He stated that staff believes that the northern half of the right-of-way could serve any future needs the City may have and therefore does not oppose the vacation. He stated that the two lots as laid out appear to meet the zoning requirements of the urban residential and shoreland overlay district. He provided additional information regarding the tree replacement policy and noted that there would be additional options should the trees required not fit on the lot. He stated that Ardmore Avenue is a 22-foot road within a 44-foot right-of-way and is under the City minimum and therefore staff recommends that additional right-of-way be dedicated in the case that the road is improved in the future. He stated that the stormwater requirements are not triggered through this reconfiguration and that is why there are no requirements of that nature. He stated that staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions included in the staff report. Murrin asked, and received confirmation, that the right-of-way is currently 60 feet and the applicant is requesting that be reduced to 30 feet. She asked is the previous home was on one of the eight lots. Finke explained that the home straddled the four lots in the center and the detached garage straddled two of the other lots. Murrin asked why the applicant would want to vacate right-of-way on Palm and then dedicate additional right-of-way on Ardmore. Finke explained that the City Engineer's recommendation is for the additional right-of-way on Ardmore in order to accommodate future road improvements for that roadway. He explained that the City would have requested the additional right-of-way regardless. Murrin asked why the applicant would want the additional area off Palm. Finke stated that the property would be counted into the lot area and therefore would provide additional square footage and flexibility for construction. Murrin asked if there would be any negative tax ramifications to vacating the right-of-way. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Finke stated that the City would actually gain taxable area but noted that it would be a very small difference. Williams referenced the City owned lot north of the property and asked if that would be a candidate for plantings, should the applicant not be able to accommodate the necessary replantings required under the tree replacement policy. Finke stated that area is already pretty wooded so there would be limited opportunities on that property. White referenced the driveway configuration to Ardmore and asked if that could change to Brook Avenue. Finke stated that it is a public right-of-way and the person building on lot two would have that choice, although lot one would have to access Ardmore. Reid referenced the northern parcel owned by the City and asked if public access to the property would be lost if the Palm Street right-of-way is vacated. Finke stated that there would still be 30 feet of right-of-way that could be used to access the property. He noted that there are a lot of parcels owned by the City in this area that have been gained through tax forfeiture. Reid opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Sue Prodahl stated that the property was her father's property and the home was demolished when he passed away. She believed the highest and best use for the property would be to divide the property into two buildable lots, which would generate additional income for the City through taxes and building permits. She confirmed that the vacated right-of-way would provide more flexibility for builders. Williams asked if the soil conditions have been verified for the lots. Craig Westman, platting surveyor, stated that a soils analysis was discussed but was not part of the requirements. He stated that he included that in the plan in order to not lead on potential purchasers as certain house types could not be done without further verification. He noted that it would be the due diligence of the potential buyer/builder to ensure that the type of home they want to build would be appropriate for the soils on the lot. He noted that footings and drain tiles would most likely be required because of the heavy soils on the lots. Williams asked if these lots would have septic. Finke advised that the lots would be connected to sewer and water. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Westman referenced the conditions regarding the development agreement and sewer and water and asked if that should be discussed with the Commission or Council. Finke stated that the timing for that could be discussed at the City Council. Reid closed the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. White stated that she does not have any problems with the application as she feels that it will fit well with the neighborhood. Finke stated that a neighbor to the northeast had concerns with the tree removal that may be required to fit two homes and the impact that could have on the lake. Foote asked if direction would need to be given on tree removal. Finke stated the applicant is on notice and a permit would be required for removal, noting that the ultimate design of the home would dictate the amount of tree removal. He advised that the intent would be to remove as little trees as possible. White asked for details on the replacement trees that would be required. Finke replied that inch per inch replacement would be required. Williams stated that he reviewed the review criteria and he did not think that those items were triggered with the exception of the soils statement. He asked staff if the notice provided to potential buyers would be sufficient. He stated that the conditions proposed by staff would address any other concerns that he may have had. Albers stated that he does not see any problems with the application. Reid stated that the only thing she was bothered by was the random public nature preserve owned by the City to north, but noted that would be the concern of the Park Commission. Foote stated that he would support the application. Murrin confirmed that the position of staff is that the right-of-way is not needed in the current amount and 30 feet would be sufficient for future road plans. Motion by Williams, seconded by Albers, to recommend approval of the Bradford Creek Addition Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and right-of-way vacation, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Nolan) 3 Project: LR-15-168 — Bradford Creek Plat and ROW Vacation The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 11/4/2015 11/4/2015 8 Application Y Application (Updated) 11/25/2015 5 Application—11-25-2015 Y Fee 11/4/2015 1 Fee Y Checks 10/12, 10/14, and 10/26 Mailing Labels Preliminary Plat 11/4/2015 11/3/2015 1 Prelim Plat Y Preliminary Plat — Updated 11/18/2015 11/18/2015 1 PrelimPlat — 11-18-2015 N Final Plat 11/4/2015 11/3/2015 1 Final Plat Y Final Plat - Updated 11/18/2015 11/18/2015 1 Final Plat — 11-18-2015 N Title Commitment 12/3/2015 11/5/2015 5 Title Commitment N Tree Calcs 11/18/2015 11/18/2015 Trees Lot 1 Trees Lot 2 N Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Engineering Comments 11/17/2015 1 EngComments Legal Comments 11/16/2015 1 LegalComments Planning Commission Report 12/3/2015 5 PCReport 12-8-2015 8 pages w/ attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Planning Commission minutes 12/8/2015 Kathryn Richmond comments 12/8/2015 Dusty Finke From: Tom Kellogg <TKellogg@wsbeng.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:06 PM To: Dusty Finke Cc: Ron Batty (rbatty@kennedy-graven.com) Subject: FW: Bradford Creek Addition Dusty, In addition to Ron's comments I have the following observations: 1. Ardmore Avenue is shown as an existing 40' ROW. They are showing what appears to be a ROW dedication of 4.29'. Shouldn't we be asking for 10' of ROW dedication so we have a 30' half ROW? 2. It appears there is a public ROW (Hazel Avenue) to Lake Ardmore. Access to Hazel Avenue is either via Palm Street or Brook Avenue. The proposed vacation of Palm Street will only leave a 30' corridor to access Hazel Avenue via Palm Street. The City should review and determine if this is appropriate. Thanks, Tom Tom Kellogg Senior Project Manager d: 612-209-5113 1 c: 612-209-5113 WSB & Associates, Inc. I Oddfellows Building 23 2nd Street SW Suite #200 I Rochester, MN 55902 WSB i tarTriibune NfiPlx41104 This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. From: Batty, Ronald H. [mailto:rbatty@Kennedy-Graven.com] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 1:54 PM To: Finke Dusty (dusty.finke@ci.medina.mn.us) Cc: Tom Kellogg Subject: Bradford Creek Addition Since this is both a preliminary and final plat application, we contacted the engineer to ask about title evidence because none was provided. He said he had prepared the plat based on what he had pieced together from various sources. He said he expected full title work later this week and would likely revised his plat based on that. He promised to forward that title work to when he receives it. Also, his email suggested that one of the fee owners was going to deliver the "application" to the city. I'm not sure whether anything has been received and, if so, what it includes. For example, t VICINITY MAP N NO SCALE Lake Ardmore G� Site- 2 Lake Independence 1 Lake Purzem 0 Half 18 Moon Lake Sec. 18, Twp. 118, Rng. 23, Hennepin County, MN PRELIM/NARY PLAT OF 0 30 I Inch = 30 Feet Existing Property Description (Limited W.D. dated Jan. 10. 2008): The Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, II and /2 Block 24, "INDEPENDENCE BEACH, Hennepin County, Minnesota" Proposed Description for the Vacation of Portion of Palm Street: That part of Palm Street as dedicated on the plat of INDEPENDENCE BEACH, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 24, said plat, as monumented; thence northerly on the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 5 to the centerline of said Palm Street; thence southeasterly along the centerline of Palm Street to intersect the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 8, Block 24, said plat; thence southerly along said northerly extension of Lot 8 to the northeast corner of said Lot 8, as monumented; thence northwesterly along the northerly line of said Block 24 to the point of beginning. Notes: No wet/ands are present on the land included within this plat. 2. Reference FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C0144E and Map No. 27053C0/42E. The property is not within a designated f/oodp/a/n and is labeled as Zone X (Area of 0.2Z annual chance flood). 3. Utilities are shown per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 152880704. Reference McCombs -Knutson Associates, Inc. 1976 as -built plans for city sewer and water layout. 4. Block 23 of INDEPENDENCE BEACH has been laid out in multiple ways, one based on the dedication description on the plat of INDEPENDENCE BEACH along with the location of the North -South Quarter line and Center of Section of Section /8, and the other based on monuments existing in Block 23 and other blocks in said plat. Judicial landmarks were set in 196/ on the north line of Block 23 based on the plat description and location of the Center of Section and North -South Quarter line (Reference: 11-17-1960 Kelley & Kelley survey for Stella Mitchell; 5-23-196/ Kelley & Kelley survey for Felix Kubik; 11-10-196/ Kelley & Kelley survey for Felix Kubik setting JLMs; Torrens Case No. 14909; and 6-I3-1994 Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors survey for Raskob Construction). It appears that the original plat of INDEPENDENCE BEACH was laid out based on a different location for the Center of Section and North -South quarter lines for Section /8 or there were erroneous dimensions on the original plat. Note that the platted distance from the North -South Quarter line of Section /8 to the northwest corner of Block 23 is 264 feet, together with 40 feet across Brook Street and /00 feet for the depth of lots in Block 29, totals 404 feet. In comparison, the original plat of INDEPENDENCE BEACH shows a distance of 396 feet (6 chains) for the south line of the said plat. It is our determination that the blocks of INDEPENDENCE BEACH were laid out and monumented without reconciling with the location of the Center of Section and North -South Quarter line of Section /8. This plat accepts the found monuments defining Block 24 and the subject properties. 5. The lowest floor elevation for proposed buildings are subject to the actual depth and elevation of the sewer service. 6. The lowest floor elevation for proposed buildings are subject to soil and water table conditions. LEGEND: ❑T x 976.40 LS 17006 I Denotes soil boring Denotes power pole Denotes telephone pedestal Denotes sanitary manhole Denotes existing water curb stop Denotes proposed water curb stop Denotes water service Denotes waterva/ve Denotes wet land Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes telephone pedestal electric meter existing ground elevation proposed elevations Theodore D Kemna, LS Denotes bituminous surface Denotes gravel surface Denotes wooden fence Denotes easement Denotes major contour existing Denotes minor contour existing SBL Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes �- >> -401 \/ \/ /\ /\ Denotes building setback line underground Telephone overhead electric sanitary sewer waterline underground gas line proposed water service line proposed sanitary sewer service line existing culvert proposed culvert proposed tree removal Denotes Tree, Coniferous C denotes cedar P denotes pine S denotes spruce Denotes Tree, Deciduous A denotes ash BCH denotes birch BX denotes boxe/der B W denotes basswood CW denotes cottonwood E denotes elm lW denotes ironwood M denotes maple O denotes oak Trees are labeled with abbreviations listed above, followed by their diameter, in inches. 60 / n / /- / / \ / / / I- - f lir 60 v L _ 3411 /P PEN \ 'SBS� �O BRADFORD CREEK ADDITION \ Re \ Ooc \ � No, S?5:356s 6\ 18 /18-23-24-0/54 1 /- /- n / ▪ /- n / r- /-- / 1 / / / - / 1 / / L _ / V L/ L_ / \ \ \Ref O oo. //\4 9�/ 6 /95. j Parcel No \ Lot 1, Block l Lot 2, Block l Ardmore Avenue S?S`366'S \ a Area 0.59 Acres (25,536 s.f.) 0.59 Acres (25,497 s. f.) 0.02 Acres (95/ s. f.) Total Acreage 1.2 Acres (51,984 s. f.) Proposed Impervious Surface: Lot I: 3,600 s.f. house/garage 1,250 s. f. driveway 4,850 s. f impervious (199) Total Allowed (259) = 6,384 s.f. Lot 2: 3,600 s.f. house/garage 1,100 s. f driveway 4,700 s. f. impervious (18.4q) Total Allowed (25%) = 6374 s. f. \ �/ i/ 2.' 1P OPEN /; JO " \ ;t /P OPEN / / / / \ 00 k.....34" lP OPEN \ 18-1 /8-23-24-0/55 retainiong wo// - 1 1 �.1 \\ 4 1l ;,/ edge of low \ / < 60 00 \ 3/4,, IF, OPEN NW Cor.-- of Lot 5 /? O \ T //6 ,X -r i Garage/ / /0 ayi u� 1 3/4 " / •_ OPEN 972.9 '21' \ r f Lake Ardmore Recreational Development Lake OD 27-153P) `' Ordinary High Water = 956.8 feet NGVD 29 (957.05 NGVD 88) Base Flood Elevation = 962 feet NAVD 88 (FEMA Map No. 27053C0/42E) area Nr� /I r P L oto 1 �/ /'. �' ce /o%er//ii Streef f \ tt, CO to \ / M /0 . *. '114' \ 18-118-23-24-0150 \ /oo • O� / fre I sett' IP /7006 et ,,O °°�1o7 i Set 6q 00 j2" lP OPEN ! - -, M/2cs O rc A O r\ N \ \ f S s°vth�r� /iij ° 69e / ho/f of�oro _ O2 k h f 'o4%sea f pr\ 1 C i F S'trE Qc4t se 6. d s \ 6 N' 6/ 0 //tee 18-1 /8-23-24-0066 \ / /\ 60 11 PROPOS HOUSE \/ 60�(2° (Verify Soils) /\ 18-118-23-24- 0067 /\C7 /, I' 1 0 co J II m 18-118' 23-24-00 3�� `S�Op 978� I \/ I�i�(\_ _ - J i \// 1 fla7 T \ / /\v /\ - �978 /8 /18-23-24-007V J - Proposed 9�81v, i\ Driveway � •� // // a 9 M / -Project \ 0/09 BM= 976.49 \ N O "NA -13•1 /8 //8 2,3 ? 4 Set -N / N %2" IP OPEN \ O//0 / Sign 'San. \ \ !, / r< L-• l l/ l// \ 1 / lA c_ ./ Lake independence 1 Soil Boring Loa \ Matthew Blesi, #4952 Soil Boring # Elevation Mottling Elev. of Mottled Soil Soil Boring / 975.00 10" 974.2 *Soil borings were not required for this preliminary plat. One soil boring was performed by Bogart, Pederson & Associates and it revealed that there may be a high water table or a perched water table due to heavy clay soils. Full basements may not be advisable for these lots without proper remedies or further soil analysis to verify full basements are warranted. MH �i iff e/ / 1 ss ' N O v N N N / 0 N 0 2 L� 40 �- 1 ' t, 1 1 J 1 J L11 ts J 1 \ 1 V .1 �• S • 8.3 J <- 40 F., \\. 3/4" lP �-_ 10 /111F,----„OPB N EN 00 - l8-118-23-24-0068 m In et ! 7 N O r 1 18-118-23-}24- 0069 978 /\ /\ Cr E / \ / / \ PROPOSED HOUSE 2 (Verify Soil o s Conditions) o \� \ \ / / \ • / \ \ L \ // / /„ -118 2 ' 24-007/0 N T9�s� y set o / ?3i 12" CMP Invert=969.09 / • \ \ 974 • O?' 2 59. 414 30 • CITY OF MEDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN i I8-118-23-24-0/5I 60 18-118-23-24-0001 18-118-23-24-0158 18-118-23-24-0118 Southeast comer of / FRIES INDEPENDENCE VIEW Bearings used for this survey are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System, NAD '83 (1986 adjustment). The South line Block 24, INDEPENDENCE BEACH bears North 69 degrees 02 minutes 41 seconds West. • Denotes 1/2 inch x 14 inch iron monument set with a plastic plug stamped R.L.S. 47466. • Denotes iron monument found. ® Denotes cast iron monument. REFERENCE BENCHMARK: Hennepin County Control Point "SIMONS" East side of Co Rd 19, South of Driveway No. 3505 PROJECT BENCHMARK: Top Nut Hydrant, southerly side of Ardmore Ave., opposite Lot 12 Block 24 OWNER & DEVELOPER: Carl & Paul Henderson & Susan Prodahl Rogers, MN 55374 SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS: Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. 13076 First Street Becker, MN 55308-9322 763-262-8822 ZONING: Urban Residential (UR) and Shoreland SHORELAND DISTRICT MINIMUMS: 75 feet Width Denotes Building Setbacks: 30' from street 30' from rear 10' from side FIELD DATE: 10/27/15 DRAWN BY: CAW CHECKED BY: BEP DWG FILE: Prelim Plat.dwg FILE NO: 15-0281.00 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Craig A. Wensmann & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BRADFORD CREEK ADDITION City of Medina Hennepin County, MN VICINITY MAP Lake Ardmore 1 NO SCALE Lake Independence i rn 0 U Q 18 rn Oc /U 1 Lake Purzem Half Moon � Lake I Sec. 18, Twp. 118, Rng. 23, Hennepin County, MN 3/4„ /P OPEN r Q O Q Q. 0 \ oc. \ NO S 253666 61 /0\ 4,4 Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: I 1 I 1-0-5 I I 1— 10 ---�— NOT TO SCALE Being 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines, also being 5 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. \ %2" IP OPEN \ /I44 // /4 iI /P OPEN /2c200 / A / r 1 r r l /- — A / r l /- — A / / l / / / 1 / / / - - / \ / / / F - / \ / / I— - / / V L L — / L _ / V L L _ / V \ / L — No S2 Sj 60 Az 660 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 6° \ Z-9T �o \ \ \ OPEN VO 1/ `/ l edge of low area \ 60 Azq a� w U O om6 0 1 0 O W W W 0 0 20 3 L--� northwest corner of Lot 5, Block 24, — INDEPENDENCE BEACH Q ii o O 6° \'0/ 9 T \ /2O O \ T \ \ \ M N O 0 O Z 3/4" IP OPEN \ \ t r� F< / /, /// Li f l/ l/ / \ \ 1 / 1 / 1 / lA L_ ./ \ Lake independence '; 1 \ 3/4 lP OPEN \ �1 \ 0 BRADFORD CREEK ADDITION 30 I Inch = 30 Feet Lake \ JO \ 6\ 6° Az4 \ IP /7006 \ \ \ 9, \ /2°. 00 Ardmore `/ < ',3,4 ,/ \ riore,56,r y //ne of 6/oc k IP /7006 ` 4 '�• < \ \ \ <: / 60 60 A'9T iL < i / T s: N 60 A�qT\N %2" IP OPEN \ \ \ \ A 'QF �i • Denotes found iron monument Denotes 1/2 inch x 14 inch iron monument with a ® plastic cap marked R.L.S. 47466, to be set within one year of the recording date of this plat. 0 Denotes found judicial landmark Bearings used for this plat are assumed. The southerly line of Block 24, INDEPENDENCE BEACH bears of North 69 degree 02 minutes 41 seconds West. \ \ \ P 2¢486 "v l\ \ N \ I %2„ IP \ OPEN ' / 60A98,3`<\ NOFAFND�NcF �'9T eFActi J r 7 1 / / ;t o� rn 40 1 • Li l J �I• 1 �J L11 n J 1 \ 1 V �T. 40 center//2e of Street /2j. \ \ \ \ soothe/6„ of%off 2g /N 04cA (1, De/ CF \ \ 3/41 1 lP OPEN L_ r n,0 6 / O /0447 northeast corner of — Lot 8, Block 24, INDEPENDENCE BEACH n0 .. W m U W Z W Q. I ? 1 o NI' 00 N N 6° p�AT m w r /- - L L \ \ \ eF406, / \ / / \ / / / \J 0 Dl \ a� 0 o4-6 .00W co J V 0 o W 2 Cri W W oZ N\ 0 C N IP /7006 N r77.) IP 17006 Northeast comer of FRIES INDEPENDENCE VIEW a� V rQ �oCm 0 (0-0�W Q rn�•oZ Q'L Ou .c o.02 �Z1� 0 0 o 010 0 mUOa 0, `11 :'` W U f., LZu ::S. O 31-U a) I EZ E `1J COO opt; 0 0 U 0 ' C O 0 -O U o -c W m o0 L11 � J /3 4 I I I I I I I -r I I I I I I I KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Carl W. Henderson, Paul B. Henderson and Susan M. Prodahl, fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to —wit: Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 Block 24, INDEPENDENCE BEACH, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with that part of vacated Palm Street described as beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot 5, thence northerly on the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 5 to the centerline of Palm Street; thence southeasterly along the centerline of Palm Street to intersect the northerly extension of the east line of said Lot 8; thence southerly along said northerly extension of Lot 8 to the northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence northwesterly along the northerly line of said Block 24 to the point of Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BRADFORD CREEK ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public way(s) and/or the drainage and utility easement(s) as created on this plat. In witness whereof said Carl W. Henderson, Paul B. Henderson, and Susan M. Prodahl, have hereunto set our hands this Carl W. Henderson STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SHERBURNE Paul B. Henderson Susan M. Prodahl The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Carl W. Henderson, Paul B. Henderson, and Susan M. Prodahl. Printed Name. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission expires: I Craig A. Wensmann do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wetlands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 , Craig A. Wensmann, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 47466 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SHERBURNE The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Craig A. Wensmann, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 47466. Printed Name: Notary Public, My Commission expires: CITY OF MEDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota This plat of BRADFORD CREEK ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City of Medina, Minnesota on this day of , 20 . If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03 by , Mayor by , Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat this Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor by SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of , 20 . , County Surveyor by COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of BRADFORD CREEK ADDITION was recorded — Southeast comer of FRIES INDEPENDENCE VIEW in this office this day of , 20 , at Martin McCormick, County Recorder by Agenda Item # 8 B NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial H ighway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, M N 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 'Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.corr PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina City Council FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: December 29, 2015 RE: Kal Point PUD Amendment & Site Plan Review CITY FILE: LR-15-170 Application Date: November 6, 2015 Review Deadline: January 5, 2016 BACKGROUND Kalyan Vempaty proposes to construct a restaurant with a second story office at 340 Clydesdale Trail. The proposal would require the following land use approvals in order to permit the construction proposed by the applicant: 1) PUD General Plan — the subject site is part of the Clydesdale Marketplace PUD, and the proposed construction differs from that approved, requiring an amendment to the PUD. 2) Site Plan Review for construction of a new commercial building. Although this staff report will generally not examine the requests separately, the Site Plan Review is technically contingent upon amendment of the PUD. The subject site is a vacant commercial pad within the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace development. Highway 55 is located south of the site. Commercial uses surround the site, and the nearest residential property is Cherry Hill to the north. The subject site is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying district of UC, Urban Commercial. The standards of the PUD are attached for reference and will be summarized throughout this report. An aerial of the subject site and surrounding area is attached for reference. PROJECT SITE & DESCRIPTION The subject property is guided for "Commercial" use by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The property is approximately 0.75 acres in size. It is legally described as Lot 4, Block 1 of Medina Clydesdale Marketplace. It is located on the east side of the development. SITE PLAN REVIEW Proposed Use The approved PUD identified a retail use on the subject site. Restaurants are listed as a conditional use in the UC District but are a permitted use within the PUD provided there is `table service'. Therefore, the proposed restaurant is a permitted use within the PUD. Offices are a permitted use in both the UC District and the PUD. Approved PUD The approved PUD identified a 3,200 square foot retail use with 37 parking spaces. The proposed restaurant has a footprint of 3,581 square feet. There is also proposed a second story office use. The parking proposed is 36 stalls. The proposed layout of the site is generally consistent with the approved PUD. Setbacks/Lot Dimensions The following table summarizes the proposed construction compared to the requirements of the UC zoning district and the PUD standards, if applicable. The subject site was previously platted as depicted in the PUD, so the lot size, width, and depth are consistent. Urban Commercial Requirement PUD Requirement Proposed Minimum Front Yard Setback 50 feet Zero 25 feet Minimum Interior Yard Setback 10 feet 10 feet 25 feet Setback from Residential 75 feet 320 feet Minimum Parking Setbacks 25 feet 5 feet 75 feet 85 feet 5 feet 200 feet Front Yard Rear/Interior Side Yards Residential Maximum Impervious Surface 60% 70% 68% Building Materials The PUD requires "four sided architecture" that is consistent with the general appearance and materials of buildings within the PUD. In the UC District building materials are required to be at least 30% brick, natural stone, granite, stucco, copper, or glass. Up to 20% may be wood, anodized aluminum, or similar materials. Decorative concrete, pre -cast concrete, and similar may be up to 70%. The PUD also requires the street facing side to be a minimum of 35% brick, stone, stucco, and/or glass. The proposed building finish is 21% stone, 26% brick, 15% stucco, 9% decorative prefinished metal, 26% glass, 1% metal door, 2% block. The composition of the street facing side is 14% stone, 24% brick, 10% decorative metal, 27% glass, and 24% stucco. As proposed, the building elevation finishes meet the code requirements. Building Modulation/Fenestration/Multi-sided Architecture General commercial zoning regulations would require a minimum of one aspect of modulation every 40 feet. The proposed structure provides modulation through variations of building height and the decorative awnings/overhangs. If this is an acceptable means of modulation, it would exceed the required number on all elevations. The PUD requires that substantial window/door coverage facing streets in the development to support a more pedestrian friendly appearance. The proposed structure includes almost 30% of the frontage along Clydesdale as windows and doors. This appears similar to the Wells Fargo building to the east and the approved Goddard school to the south. There is a patio area proposed on the front center of the building. The PUD design guidelines discuss a pedestrian scale development with buildings that have a street presence with architectural details at the street level. The plan reviewed by the Planning Commission had the entrance to the front as just a secondary exit. The Planning Commission requested the applicant make the primary "grand" entrance on the front of the building. The applicant revised the plan and has an entrance off of the front in this plan but it appears to be more of a secondary access. The Council should determine if this is satisfactory. The ordinance states that buildings cannot exceed 35 feet if sprinkled or 30 feet if not sprinkled. The proposed building is 27 feet in height. Tree Preservation / Landscaping All trees on site are proposed to remain. The approved PUD plan identified 13 deciduous, 9 ornamental, and 8 coniferous trees. There were trees planted on the site with the initial development that included 5 deciduous trees and 7 conifers. The applicant is proposing to provide 8 deciduous, 9 ornamental, and 1 coniferous tree. There is also additional landscaping provided in the front of the building. Transportation The applicant proposes to utilize the existing curb cut for access into the site on the western side. On the eastern side of the site, there is the exit from the bank. The applicant intends to connect the drive from their parking area in the rear to this drive. The City Engineer is recommending additional striping to better regulate the flow of traffic into this drive. A bicycle rack has been provided as required by City Code. Off -Street Parking The applicant proposes 36 parking spaces. The parking demand for the restaurant and office use are calculated at 55 spaces. The applicant states that the remainder of the required parking will be provided for by the shopping center parking lot. The parking lot for the shopping center provides for over 750 stalls. The buildings and uses present on the site have a required parking calculation of about 550. Therefore, it does not appear that there would be a conflict with using this extra parking provided that there is a shared parking arrangement in form and substance acceptable to the City (which will need to be provided prior to consideration of the resolution). However, much of this parking is about 350 to 400 feet away from the building and may merit expansion of the trail system along the City street to provide adequate access. The drive aisle entering the site on the west is 24 feet wide. A portion of the eastern drive is shared with the exit from the bank to the east. The drive aisle is 22 feet in width on the eastern side for the portion north of the shared drive. The drive aisles to access the parking are 22 feet in width. The parking ordinance requires primary drive aisles to be 24 feet and secondary drive aisles to be 22 feet in width. The parking stalls are 9 feet wide by 9 feet deep. All standards appear to be generally consistent with ordinance requirements. No parking signs will need to be installed along the drives. The Planning Commission recommended additional signage being placed on site directing customers to designated shared parking areas and away from areas where shared parking was not allowed. Grading / Drainage The applicant proposes to discharge stormwater to the system installed to serve the development. There is an existing storm pond to the north of the site that was installed with the original development plan. The applicant is proposing to use a pervious pavement for a portion of the parking lot. If this is properly installed the City Engineer states that it is acceptable to consider as a pervious surface. City Staff is also recommending the installation of a sump catch basin due to the area being directly upstream from the pond to the north. With this basin and the pervious pavement, the site would provide stormwater benefits above what was planned for the site. There is a wetland to the west of this property. The site slopes towards it from the property necessitating a retaining wall. Due to the height of the wall, a fence is necessary. Sewer / Water Utilities were stubbed to the site during the initial development. A utility plan has been provided and is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Loading Dock / Trash The loading area is provided on the eastern side of the building. The trash is stored in the building in this same area, which is required by the PUD. Mechanical Equipment Any mechanical equipment placed on the roof will require screening details to be provided. Lighting Plan / Signage The applicant has provided a lighting plan depicting conformance with Section 828.11 regarding glare. The plan was reviewed against Section 829 and found to be compliant with the code and PUD requirements. The applicant had originally proposed lighted signage on three sides of the building, including the rear. At the request of the Planning Commission, the sign on the rear (north side) has been removed and there are now signs proposed on the east, west, and south sides of the building. Park Dedication The park dedication for this parcel was deferred until the time of site development. Park dedication fees in the amount of $23,570 will be required. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their December 8th meeting. The Commission recommended approval with conditions noted below. The Planning Commission also recommended that the front entrance be a "grand" or primary entrance. As proposed, there is an entrance to the front added to the plan but it is not necessarily the primary entrance to the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The potential issue with the project would be the parking being not provided to the level required by the ordinance. If the applicant can enter into an agreement with a neighboring property to account for this parking, the plan would appear to be acceptable. Provided the applicant can provide such an agreement, City Staff finds the plan to be generally acceptable and recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 2. The shared parking arrangement shall be submitted in form and content acceptable to the City Attorney. 3. All requirements of the PUD not otherwise amended by this approval shall be met. 4. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and provide necessary letter of credit to ensure the required site improvements are completed. 5. Easements shall be placed over the pervious pavement area and all other necessary storm water management facilities. 6. No parking signs shall be installed on the access drives. 7. The eastern drive shall be striped to control traffic in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer. 8. The fence on the retaining shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. 9. Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened in conformance with all City ordinances. 10. Park dedication fees in the amount of $23,570 shall be paid. 11. A sidewalk to trail to the shared parking area shall be provided. 12. Signs directing patrons to the appropriate shared parking areas shall be installed. 13. All comments from the Watershed District or any other agency shall be satisfied. 14. All comments from the Fire Marshal shall be satisfied. 15. All fees incurred by the City for the review of this application shall be paid. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Photo 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Planning Commission minutes 3. Engineering comments dated 12-1-2015 4. Building Official comments dated 11-11-2015 5. Applicant Narrative 6. Plans Aerial Photo: Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Kal Point — Planned Unit Development General Plan and Site Plan Review for Construction of a Restaurant and Office (340 Clydesdale Trail) — Public Hearing Murrin asked if she would have a conflict because she lives adjacent to the property. Finke stated that technically there would not be a conflict because she does not have a financial interest but noted that the question would be whether she could remain objective to the application. Murrin stated that she could and would then take part in the review of this item. Sparks presented a request for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) General Plan and for a Site Plan review for the construction of a restaurant and office space. He stated that the entire development was approved as a PUD in 2005 and this parcel was identified as retail use. He explained that an amendment would be needed for the PUD as this desired use is not the original intended use. He noted that from a use point of view, both a restaurant and office space would be allowable uses. He provided details on the two-story building that would include a restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor. He displayed a sketch of the proposed site with the building as proposed, providing additional details and noted that the plan is consistent with the general concept for the development. He referenced parking and advised that a restaurant of this size would require 40 spaces and the office space would require 15. He stated that this site has 36 stalls and the applicant is proposing to fill the remaining balance with shared parking from the adjacent Target site. He advised that the Target site does have extra space but noted there is a bit of distance between the site and the proposed shared parking. He noted that the trail system could be extended towards that area to provide pedestrian access. He stated that the restaurant is titled as a bar and grill, which usually has more business at night, noting that time frame could work well with the shared parking of a retail site. He stated that if the shared parking is going to be allowed a written agreement would be needed. He identified a crosshatch area in the center of the lot that is proposed to be constructed with pervious pavement. He provided additional details on the proposed retaining wall and recommended fencing. He advised that the PUD requires four-sided architecture and provided additional details on the proposed building materials and design. He provided additional details on the proposed access point but noted that if the recommendations from the City Engineer cannot be worked into the plans, the access would remain as it is. He noted that additional details are needed on the existing tree species and regarding the landscaping plan. He stated that staff does not have concern with the parking because of the excess parking nearby but noted that a written agreement would be needed. He noted that staff recommends approval as proposed with the conditions and recommendations in the staff report. White referenced the original PUD, noting that restaurant and office space are approved uses, and asked if combining the two uses into one building were mentioned in the PUD. Sparks stated that the original PUD designated certain uses for certain spaces. He noted that over the years, items have come in that differ slightly but have still been accepted as long as the uses are allowed in the PUD. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes White asked if office space had been designated for any sites in the original PUD. Sparks stated that the original PUD specified uses but also deferred to the uses allowed in the urban commercial district as well. White asked if the original PUD addressed having a two-story building as she believed the other buildings are one story. Sparks stated that the PUD did not prohibit a two-story building but confirmed that there are no other two-story buildings. White asked for heights of other building heights. Sparks stated that a 35-foot building would be allowed if sprinkled and noted that this building would be 26 feet and would come in under the sprinkling requirement. White asked what the square footage would need to be in order to fit with the available number of parking stalls. Sparks stated that restaurant parking requirements are not based off square footage and provided additional details on the calculations used for that type of use. Williams referenced parking and stated that the applicant proposes to have an agreement with the Target site and asked how realistic is would be since there would be parking available at Wells Fargo since that site is closer and that building closes at 5:00 p.m. He asked if the applicant considered sharing parking with Wells Fargo instead. Sparks stated that there have been discussions with the applicant regarding the shared parking and the applicant has been working with Target because of the available amount of excess parking spaces. Albers asked for additional information on the pedestrian access recommended by staff. Sparks highlighted the path that would take. Williams asked if the restaurant would be using the office space or whether they would be using the space themselves. Sparks believed that the applicant is going to use the office space for themselves. He provided additional details on the storm water management and noted that providing the adjustments recommended by the City Engineer, the proposed plans would be sufficient. Albers asked if additional maintenance would be required for pervious pavement. Sparks stated that there is some maintenance and that is why the additional conditions were added. 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Albers referenced the fence and asked if the fence would run the entirety of the retaining wall or just in the sections two feet above grade level. Sparks stated that the recommendation is for the fence to run the entirety of the retaining wall. Murrin referenced the setback and received confirmation that the City would be okay with the zero foot front yard setback. She referenced the building finish and asked if there is a corresponding condition for approval. She referenced the drive aisles and was unsure that widths were mentioned. Sparks noted that the widths would meet the City Code. Murrin referenced condition 17 and confirmed that would be Metro West. Foote referenced the parking and asked if the parking in the back of the building are normal sizes or whether those are smaller spaces. Sparks noted that the stalls meet the City requirements. Foote asked how people would know to park in the Target parking lot if the original lot is full. Sparks noted that signage could be installed. Foote stated that he was concerned with the distance between this site and the Target site. Reid asked the available spaces at the Goddard site, as that site is not open on the weekend. The owner of Goddard stated that they are not interested in shared parking. Reid asked how many of the parking spaces would be for the patio seating. Sparks stated that five stalls would be equal to the patio parking. Reid noted that for three seasons of the year the patio seating would not be used. She noted that the office use within the building would most likely have different use than the restaurant and therefore with that consideration and the patio, the parking calculation may be higher than actually needed. She referenced the sump pump and asked if it is less than desirable for the applicant to have the pervious pavement. Finke stated that pervious pavement takes more maintenance than regular pavement and is an allowable treatment. He noted that the applicant is requesting a waiver from the full requirements and that is why additional recommendations had been made. Albers asked if the west curb cut would align with the Goddard entrance. Sparks stated that the curb cuts were installed before the sites were developed. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Finke confirmed that they do line up. Reid opened the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. Kal Vempaty, the applicant, provided details on the application, which would include the restaurant on the first floor and office space on the second floor. He stated that the office space would accommodate seven to 10 employees. He asked that the project architect is also present to address any questions. Greg Dahling, project architect, stated that the restaurant use for parking calculations would be 40 stalls and noted that the restaurant use would be evenings and weekends. He stated that the office use would be normal daytime business hours during weekdays so those uses would not have much overlap. He stated that the applicant has also been working with Target to obtain the shared parking document. Kal Vempaty stated that the owner of the development has stated that shared parking could occur for any of the uses and the document will be further modified to allow for the shared parking of nearby uses. He stated that there are additional maintenance charges that they would contribute to in order to have access to the shared parking. Finke stated that there is shared parking allowed throughout the site but each site should provide its own parking for its space as well. He noted that the amendment would be necessary to allow for the shared parking with Target as this site would not have sufficient parking for its requirement. Williams confirmed that the applicant would be buying their way out of the self-sufficient parking requirement with the Target agreement. He asked and received confirmation that the office space would not be leased and would be used for his business use. Greg Dahling stated that they will work with staff to ensure the right combination of materials. He stated that they would prefer to avoid the fence on the retaining wall and only place the fence on the areas above 30 inches, as specified in City Code. Williams stated that for aesthetic purposes perhaps the whole are should be fenced. Greg Dahling stated that would be reviewed but noted that they would not want to obstruct the view from Clydesdale. He referenced the eastern side of the property, near Wells Fargo and stated that they would be requested inward access of the site from Wells Fargo and not from Clydesdale. He stated that delivery vehicles could use that path in order to make deliveries. He clarified that they are not asking for access from Clydesdale but simply from the Wells Fargo lot. Reid stated that she visited the site on 5:00 p.m. on a Sunday night and was surprised with the level of traffic in that area. Kal Vempaty stated that Target has supported the design of this proposal as well. 4 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Murrin asked for additional information on the office space use. Kal Vempaty stated that he owns other businesses and the office space would be used for his office use. He provided additional information on the IT services his business provides. Murrin referenced the business signage and asked if all three signs would be illuminated. Kal Vempaty confirmed that the three signs would be lit. Murrin asked if there would be live music or bands. Kal Vempaty stated that they do not have live music or bands and would be a similar atmosphere to Applebee's. Reid asked how the size of the restaurant space was chosen. Kal Vempaty provided details on the calculations they used to determine the size of the building including population, nearby residents, and business polling. Reid stated that she likes the design standards to make the site pedestrian friendly. She stated that it makes sense to have the door at the back to have people easily come in but believed that it would cut the building off from the remainder of the site for walkability. She asked if the building could be reversed. Kal Vempaty stated that was his first proposal, to have the grand entrance at the front, but there would be space lost if that option was chosen. He stated that the patio location would also have an impact, as customers would rather sit front side rather than at the back of the building. Reid stated that a lot of restaurants have patios and entrances in the front of the building. Greg Dahling stated that could be reviewed during the design phase. He noted that additional controllability will be reviewed during the liquor license discussion and therefore he was hesitant to confirm to access through the patio at this time. Reid asked, and received confirmation, that the application would be in agreement with bicycle racks. She referenced the recommended landscaping plan and noted that she would like to see additional landscaping in the front. She stated that the front looks very office and not like a restaurant and therefore she would like to see additional landscaping in the front to make it more welcoming. Greg Dahling stated that the drawing of the building is not an accurate landscaping plan. Sparks noted that the landscaping plan was provided in the Commission packet. Kal Vempaty asked if the Commission desires an entrance in the front. 5 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Reid stated that the item will be discussed as others may have another point of view. Greg Dahling stated that the reason there is not a secondary door is for controllability, where management would have to watch a front and back door, but noted that could be accommodated if needed. Reid opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. Aaron Amic, Medina resident and business owner of Goddard School, stated that he will support this restaurant but also has some concerns. He stated that the curb cuts do align and he has concern that if the parking lot is full that people will spill over into his lot. He stated that he is not interested in sharing parking with the restaurant as he does not receive funding from the maintenance account for the development. He stated that the agreement for his property was clear that there would be no cross usage and his biggest concern is that people would still park in his lot. He was also concerned with the flow of the traffic. Williams asked if there is typically parking occurring at night or on weekends. Amic stated that there is cleaning staff that use the parking during the off hours. Williams stated that signage could be posted directing people to Target for overflow parking. Murrin asked if the parking lot for Goddard School is part of the shared parking in the development agreement. Amic stated that his parking is separate from the shared agreement. He was unsure of the answer but agreed that signage could assist. He asked for written assurance from the applicant on how the issue would be addressed if patrons park in his lot. He stated that his hope is that the restaurant is very successful and noted that if the site is successful the parking will overflow and they will spill into his lot because it is closer than Target. Williams stated that perhaps signage stating Goddard School only could be installed if it becomes a problem. Rand Lillie stated that he is opposed to the restaurant use as this will increase traffic and noise. He stated that they already hear the disturbance of the traffic and use of the site and would like the Commission to consider the noise that an additional use could add. He was also concerned with the safety of the pond, as the neighborhood side had been fenced to prevent children from having accidents. Williams stated that in the past walls had been installed to assist in preventing the spread of noise and asked if that would be appropriate in the loading area. Sparks noted that there were conditions added to prevent additional noise disturbance including the trash being inside and the landscaping that will assist with screening of light and noise. 6 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Albers referenced snow removal and asked if that was handled by individual property owners or the management company, as stalls will be lost when snow is stored on the property. Sparks identified an area occupied by landscaping in the northwest corner that could be used for snow storage. Finke stated that staff would look into that with the shared parking agreement. Reid closed the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. Reid stated that the issues identified were traffic and circulation, parking, entrance to the building, drainage, and landscaping. She referenced traffic and circulation and the request to make the Wells Fargo a one way through. Williams stated that would be up to Wells Fargo as to whether or not to allow that, and advised that if they choose to not allow that the delivery trucks would need to access through Clydesdale. He agreed that proof of parking needs to be provided through a shared parking agreement and believed that signage should be installed to direct overflow traffic to the Target lot. He also believed a statement should be added that if there is evidence that people are parking at the Goddard School a sign would be installed, at the applicant's expense, stating no parking in the Goddard lot. Murrin stated that the overflow parking could be directed to any area other than Goddard School. She stated that it would be clearer to install a sign that says you cannot park at the Goddard School rather than direct people to every other business. Finke stated that staff will figure out the technicalities and language for signage. Reid asked for input on the entrance to the building and whether that should be orientated more towards the rest of the marketplace community Williams agreed that there should be a front entrance but did not want the traffic to go through the patio area. Reid stated that she would like the front entrance to function and act as the main entrance. Greg Dahling stated that in regard to making the main entrance on the front, the majority of people would be coming from the back parking area and therefore an entrance could be made on the front but that would be the secondary access and the main entrance would be in the back. Williams stated that the entrance on the front will be functioning but will not be the main entrance. Reid stated that she would like to see the front entrance be the main entrance with the inside setup however the applicant desires. 7 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Murrin referenced the landscaping and suggested that additional trees be planted in the back and perhaps the sign on that side not be lit to prevent disturbance to the neighborhood. Williams stated that there is an Ordinance and PUD that would deal with light pollution in addition to the evergreen trees that will be planted in the back. Murrin stated that if you are in the parking lot you would not need a lighted sign to find the building. Williams stated that he is not convinced that this would rise to the level the Commission needs to address as the existing regulations would govern that. Finke noted that this would be the closest sign to the residential development. Reid asked if the applicant would be comfortable with that request or perhaps a smaller sign or placed lower. Kal Vempaty stated that they are placing signs on three sides of the building and he would be fine not placing a sign on the back side of the building at this time. Greg Dahling stated that perhaps limitations be placed on a sign for the back side of the building should the applicant wish to add that in the future. Finke stated that staff could work on the language prior to the review by the Council. Murrin asked if a height minimum should be specified for the decorative fence on the retaining wall. Reid did not think that additional limitations should be placed at this time on the fencing. Williams noted that specifications are provided in the City Code. He asked what would happen if the pervious pavement would not be maintained. Finke stated that the water would still ultimately filter down and noted that records of maintenance would also need to be provided. Motion by Murrin, seconded by Albers, to recommend approval of the PUD General Plan and Site Plan for the construction of a restaurant and office at 340 Clydesdale Trail, Kal Point, subject to the conditions noted in the staff report, with the addition that signs should be installed directing patrons to the shared parking areas, if the signage does not work the applicant shall work with staff to direct patrons away from the Goddard School; the grand main entrance shall be in the front, off of Clydesdale; and lighted sides are allowed on three sides of the building but not the north side of the building. Motion approved unanimously. (Absent: Nolan) Finke noted that all of the items considered tonight, if approved, would be considered at the January 5, 2016 City Council meeting. 8 Mi►SB c�C Assac� engineering • planning • environmental • construction December 1, 2015 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: City Project: American Indian Bar and Grill WSB Project No. 02712-650 Dear Dusty: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-5q1-1700 We have reviewed the site plan submittal dated November 6, 2015 for the American Indian Bar and Grill. The plans propose to construct a two story building with a restaurant/bar on the main level and office/business space on the second floor. Comments regarding engineering matters are show below. 1. The site plan details show a 9 (heavy duty concrete pavement) on the east side of the pervious pavement section. The plans should be revised with the correct number (6). 2. The plans show two-way traffic in the drive aisle east of the building. The plans show sharing this easterly curb cut to Clydesdale Trail with Wells Fargo. This curb cut is currently outbound only for Wells Fargo. The easterly drive aisle shown on the plans for the American Indian Bar and Grill site should be signed outbound (southbound) only. 3. The grading plan should include parking lot and drive aisle grades. 4. A catch basin should be added over the existing 18" storm pipe downstream from CB-100. 5. CB 102 should be revised to include a 4' sump. 6. Storm sewer calculations should be provided for review and approval. 7. The retaining wall shown along the west side of the site is proposed to be within the 5' perimeter drainage and utility easement. Typically this is not permitted and the City should consider whether this is allowed. 8. Pertinent storm, sanitary and water main City standard details should be included in the plan set. 9. Stormwater reuse calculations should be provided to verify the volumes noted in their ECWMC memo. An exhibit should accompany the calculations showing what areas will be irrigated. American Indian Bar and Grill December 1, 2015 Page 2 Please contact me at 612-209-5113 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. / rl�/5/4/—_, Tom Kellogg METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. Loren Kohnen, Pres. November 11, 2015 TO. Debra Peterson Planning Commission City Council FROM: Loren Kohnen RE: Site Plan Review For Restaurant 340 Clydesdale Trail (763) 479-1720 FAX ( 7 63) 479-3090 Mtrowst76@aol.com After review of site plan for the building, architect must show that a 48' ladder truck can manuever through the parking lot. The P.I.V. and Fire Dept. fire sprinkler connection must not be blocked with landscaping. The Fire Department connection must have a clear area on both sides of 6', this includes fences and architect features. LK:jg Box 248, Loretto, Minnesota 55357 November 6, 2015 City Of Medina 2052 County Road 24, Medina MN 55340, Project Name: Kal Point Reg: Ground up Construction of an American Indian Bar & Grill on entry level and upper level being an office space at 340 Clydesdale Trail, Medina MN 55340 Project Narrative: This project is being submitted for P.U.D. Amendment and Site Plan Review for a proposed Restaurant and Office mixed use building. The project location is directly west of the existing Wells Fargo Bank building within the existing Medina Clydesdale Marketplace P.U.D. development located just North of Highway 55 between County Road 101 and Clydesdale Trail. Site and Access: The project site is approximately 0.75 acres and will consist of a 2-Story building (approx. 3,581 sf footprint, and approx. 7,162 sf total), pedestrian walkways, exterior restaurant patio seating area, illuminated public parking facilities, and landscaped green areas. The existing site access/egress driveways located at the Southwest and Southeast corners of the property are intended to remain as -is, with the building street side and parking in the rear. The existing curbing along the adjacent Wells Fargo property will be partially removed for shared use of the existing site access/egress drive similar to that which was indicated in the original P.U.D. development drawings. The Wells Fargo Bank drive thru, common service drive, and driveway will remain a one-way egress circulation pattern. The building, will consist of two uses. The entry level will be primarily a restaurant/bar use with a design intent of 100 — 130 seating (including outdoor seating) along with associated restaurant support areas, customer restrooms, kitchen, etc., and exterior patio seating area. The upper level will be office/business use with private entry/access from the entry level. Site Lighting: The bituminous trail, along Clydesdale Trail, will remain and the parking lot lighting has been designed with fixtures of similar appearance and finish to the other parking lot lighting within the shopping center area. Exteriors of the Building: The exterior of the building has been designed so as to be complimentary with the other buildings throughout the existing P.U.D. development. The design consists of a mixture of stone, brick, and E.I.F.S./Stucco finishes along with extensive aluminum and glass storefront systems. Decorative metal awnings and metal coping bands have been added to the building for articulation. The finish colors proposed have been chosen so as to be complimentary of the other buildings throughout the existing P.U.D. development while also providing an identity for this business location. The building will also provide decorative sconce lighting around the building perimeter which will help illuminate the buildings entries while also providing necessary emergency exit lighting Phasing Plan: Both first (1st) floor and second (2nd) floor constructions would be planned to go at the same time. Operations: Second level office is your typical Monday thru Friday 8am-5pm hours of business. The restaurant is 11 am-11 pm, seven days a week. Trash/Garbage Collection Process: Our vendors are expected to clear all the onsite trash & garbage between the hours of 6 am to 7 am every Monday or Wednesday of the week. This window is desired and chosen to avoid any additional traffic during business hours. The interior trash is accessed via a garage door on the east side of the building. Supplier Deliveries & Frequencies Onsite: Our suppliers would be scheduled to deliver materials/ onsite supplies between the hours of 5:30 am to 7 am, every Thursday & Friday of the week. Similar to trash pickup, the deliveries will be accessed on the east side of the building through a back service door. Zoning Classification: The site is currently zoned PUD-Planned Unit Development. Signage: No new site signage is proposed. It is understood that a site monument sign exists within the P.U.D. development and this property will coordinate access/space for site signage with the development owner. Signage on the building will consist of (3) Wall Signs. Signs are being proposed on the North, South, and East building facades. The sign areas of each sign will be designed up to 6% of the building wall area (per maximum established by city). In addition, window signs (two total) and address signs (two total) are proposed for this building as permitted by city code. The final sign design and locations will be submitted by the sign vendor during the sign permit submittal process. Pedestrian Access: The site has a sidewalk at the north front of the building to allow access from the on -site parking lot, but also has a westerly sidewalk that connects to the bituminous trail along Clydesdale Trail that allows pedestrian access from areas of the shopping center, primarily the off -site shared parking, east of the bank. Shared Parking Agreement: Clydesdale Marketplace Owner, east of the property and bank, has agreed to enter into an agreement for shared parking between this property and their vast parking lot. This will allow for any additional required parking, above the 36 spaces provided, along with the peak sit-down restaurant time in the evening, opposite the upper level office use. Access Easement Agreements: An access easement will be granted along the east perimeter of the site in favor of the City of Medina, for the purpose of access and maintenance of the common storm pipe, outlet and pond. Grading and Storm Water: The building and patio will sit above Clydesdale Trail by a few feet with the parking lot draining to the north and northeast. The west access drive will ramp up to the parking lot and the east drive aisle will blend in to the existing grades along the Well Fargo Bank's common service drive. The storm water run-off primarily drains to existing common storm trunk lines that circle counter clockwise around the site to the regional storm pond in the northeast corner of the site. A separate Storm Water Memo to Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, explains the pervious pavement (middle parking rows) and storm water compliance and credit. Proper erosion control will be provided during construction, such as rock entrance, silt fence, and inlet protection. Utilities: The site has existing utilities stubbed or in the immediate area for connection. Primary connections are in the south or southeast portion of the parcel, near the southeast utility room. Landscape and Irrigation: Tree quantities (both existing and proposed) will match the 2005 PUD plan and perennial/shrubs will complement the parking and building/patio perimeter, similar to the existing adjacent retail developments. The site will be irrigated and connected to the shopping center's central irrigation system, which has a storm water reusable water source (no City water) in the northerly regional pond. For any additional information or if any item is missing, please contact me at any time. Thank you, Kalyan C Vempaty ("Kai") (Business Owner) For Correspondence via POST Kal Stay, LLC PO BOX 44262 Eden Prairie MN 55344 contactkalyan(a�hotmail.com Or Email to: Kalyanvc@kalstay.com Office Address: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Ln N, Suite 104 Plymouth, MN 55447 / C i I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 / I I I I 38' 4" BLDG. LOCAT. DIM. w 0 0 z o° i 0 4° 4 I is N89°18'18"W I I PROPOSED 2-STORY BLDG. RESTAURANT - ENTRY LEVEL 1z OFFICE - UPPER LEVEL FOOTPRINT: 3,581 SQ. FT. 00 0 7==. =525.00 =100.22 0°56'13" CB=N: i v i� SITE PLAN S89°18'16"E 118.00 I 0 I I �y CJ I I I I I 03 m I SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR SITE DATA I AND DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY I I. I I I V i f EXISTING BUILDING LOCATION MAP PRELIM. BLDG. CODE DATA GENERAL INFORMATION: A. PROJECT NAME: KAL POINT PROJECT LOCATION: 340 CLYDESDALE TRAIL MEDINA, MN 55340 B. EXISTING ZONING: P.U.D. (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) C. PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANT/BAR (ENTRY LEVEL) OFFICE (UPPER LEVEL) D. LOT SIZE: 0.75 ACRES / 32,778 S.F. E. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B (2-STORIES) F. FULLY SPRINKLERED IN COMPLIANCE WITH IBC CHAPTER 9 & 2007 INT. FIRE CODE (EXIST.) APPLICABLE CODES: A. MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE B. MEDINA - CITY CODE C. MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE D. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE E. MINNESOTA MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODES F. MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE G. MINNESOTA ENERGY CODE 2015 CURRENT 2007 2014 2015 2015 2015 BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: A. BUILDING OCCUPANCY & CLASSIFICATION (Ch. 3 & Ch. 6) 1. ASSEMBLY - Group A-2 - 3,250 S.F. (Entry Level) - Approximate Restaurant/Bar/Patio Seating: 130± 2. OFFICE SIGNAGE: A. SITE: - Group B - 3,912 S.F. (Total All Levels) - 331 S.F. Entry Level (Entry) - 3,581 S.F. Upper Level PERMITTED MONUMENT SIGN EXIST. P.U.D. LOCATION B. WALL SIGNS: INTERN.ILLUM. C. ADDRESS SIGN D. WINDOW SIGNS 6% WALL AREA (MAX. OF 3) (PER ORIG. P.U.D.) (1) EACH TENANT/ 12 S.F. MAX. (1) PER TENANT SPACE PROPOSED ACQUIRE SPACE AS AVAILABLE WITH PROPERTY OWNER -102 S.F. (S. WALL) - 84 S.F. EA. (E. & W. WALLS) (1) PER TENANT SPACE (2 TOT.) (1) PER TENANT SPACE (2 TOT.) 01 PROJECT TEAM OWNER: KAL STAY, LLC 3169 FERNBROOK LANE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 PH: 952.905.9309 EMAIL: contactkalyan@hotmail.com BUILDING/ ZONING DEPTS.: CITY OF MEDINA PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. 2052 COUNTY ROAD 24 MEDINA, MN 55340 PH: 763.473.4643 GENERAL T.B.D. CONTRACTOR: MECH. / ELEC. / tT.B.D. - DESIGN / BUILD PLUMB. / FIRE SPRINKLER / FIRE ALARM: ARCHITECT: FINN DANIELS ARCHITECTS, INC. 2145 FORD PARKWAY, SUITE 301 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55116 PH: 651.888.6884 EMAIL: gdahling@finn-daniels.com STRUCTURAL ALIGN STRUCTURAL, INC. ENGINEER: 241 CLEVELAND AVENUE S., SUITE B7 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55105 PH: 651.698.0164 EMAIL: rickj@alignstructural.com CIVIL ENGINEER: WESTWOOD 7699 ANAGRAM DRIVE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PH: 952.906.7456 EMAIL: Paul.Schroeder@westwoodps.com DRAWING INDEX ARCHITECTURAL A100 SITE PLAN & PROJECT INFORMATION A101 SITE VIEWS / ROOFTOP SCREENING DETAILS A200 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS A300 PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A301 PRELIMINARY PERSPECTIVE ELEVATIONS CIVIL C1 COVER SHEET C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS - REMOVALS C3 SITE PLAN C4 GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C5 UTILITY PLAN C6 DETAILS C7 DETAILS C8 LANDSCAPE PLAN SURVEY CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY SITE LIGHTING LTG-1 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN LTG-2 SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE CUT SHEETS KEY TO NOTES O EXISTING SITE ENTRY DRIVE W/ APRON TO REMAIN. O EXISTING STREET CURB TO REMAIN. .0 EXISTING BITUMINOUS WALK TO REMAIN. O EXISTING CONCRETE WALK TO REMAIN. O EXISTING ADJACENT SITE CONDITIONS & STRUCTURES TO REMAIN. 0. EXISTING DIRECTIONAL/ TRAFFIC SIGN TO REMAIN. O EXISTING BOULEVARD & SITE LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS TO REMAIN. .0 NEW CURB LOCATION, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. O NEW PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WALK, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. .0 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS W/ STRIPED AISLE, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 11 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PAD LOCATION. .0 TRASH / RECYCLING AT INTERIOR OF BUILDING. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR CURB CONDITION. 0. RESTAURANT PATIO SEATING AREA WITH GUARDRAIL AND LIGHTING. 14 EGRESS STAIR DOWN TO GRADE. is FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. .0 RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. .0 AREA OF PERVIOUS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. • LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. i9 BIKE RACKS .0 DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL/FENCE AT RETAINING WALL PORTIONS EXCEEDING 30" ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE. 01 Finn daniels ARCHITECTS 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 Fax 690.5545 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: I hereby certify that this plan, specifi- cation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Typed Name Registration Number Date PROJECT: KAL POINT 340 CLYDESDALE TRAIL MEDINA, MN 55340 PROJECT NO.: 15064 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: ISSUES AND REVISIONS: GGD GGD CITY SUBMITTAL: 11.06.2015 APLANNING COMMENTS: 11.06.2015 SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN & PROJECT INFORMATION Al 00 A100 / 1" = 20'-0" RESIDENTIAL nk101 NORTH /SOUTH SITE VIEW SCHEMATIC 1/16" = 1'-0" LINE OF SITE WETLAND AREA O SITE PARKING LOT KAL POINT 7 \ -v N OA, N S/>. O' NQO NO ROOFTOP SCREENING PROPOSED THESE PLANS DUE TO "LINE OF SITE" FROM ADJACENT SITE LOCATION GRADES AND EXISTING MATURE TREES IN COMBINATION WITH BUILDING PARAPET HEIGHT PROVIDING NATURAL SCREENING I— CLYDESDALE TRAIL (E/W) WELLS FARGO O� UNE OF 511E O NO ROOFTOP SCREENING PROPOSED THESE PLANS DUE TO "LINE OF SITE" FROM ADJACENT SITE LOCATION GRADES AND EXISTING MATURE TREES IN COMBINATION WITH BUILDING PARAPET HEIGHT PROVIDING NATURAL SCREENING L— J LINE F SITE CLYDESDALE TRAIL (N/S) � EAST /WEST SITE VIEW SCHEMATIC !\._101 / 1/16" = 1'-0" TVIEW FROM PROJECT SITE TO CLYDESDALE LTRAIL LOCATED TO THE WEST J TVIEW FROM PROJECT SITE TO RESIDENTIAL LPROPERTIES LOCATED TO THE NORTH J KEY TO NOTES O SITE PROPERTY LINE LOCATION O "POINT OF VIEW" AT 5'-0" ABOVE ADJACENT SURFACE O APPROXIMATE GRADE LOCATION O BUILDING OUTLINE WITH APPROXIMATE PARAPET HEIGHT O APPROXIMATE ROOF -TOP UNIT LOCATIONS / SIZES. O EXISTING MATURE TREES / SCREENING. daniels firm ARCHITECTS 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 Fax 690.5545 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: I hereby certify that this plan, specifi- cation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of M I N N ESOTA. Typed Name Registration Number Date PROJECT: 340 MEDINA, KAL CLYDESDALE POINT MN 55340 TRAIL PROJECT DRAWN CHECKED ISSUES AND NO.: 15064 BY: GGD BY: GGD REVISIONS: CITY SUBMITTAL: 11.06.2015 01 PLANNING COMMENTS: 11.06.2015 SHEET TITLE: SITE VIEWS / ROOFTOP SCREENING DETAILS 3 A300 r � I ENTRY LEVEL BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 3,581 SQ. FT. r � INTERIOR PORTIONS OF BUILDING SHOWN FOR SCHEMATIC REFERENCE ONLY AT THIS TIME i REPRESENTING GENERAL COMPONENTS OF BUILDING USES. FINAL PLANS TO BE DEVELOPED AT FUTURE DATE. II II III / Ili 1 / IL IJ 1- -IF L AI IL A 1- 71 I1 L AL _IL A 0 L AI ILA 1-7I I1-7 L ALALA 0 L Al IL A 1- 71 11- 7 L AI_ _IL A � (� i ( (N i �/ _ \��� ( \ /\\\`U J ( 1 U I- -1I- -I I- -IF -1I- -I L J1 ILA LA1 ILA (�i (�1 N_ ▪ -11-77-1 L AI IL ▪ �I I1- L ALJ I- L J1 IL A L A —LJI ILA L_IL _IL J � -1I I JJ I I O` 7 71 • I_ A I LOBBY IT IF J TRASH/ RECYCLE / ELEV. / 77 � J ELEV. MECH. F UTIL. 9 y�l PRELIMINARY ENTRY LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 A300 A200 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 A300 r � I UPPER LEVEL BUILDING FOOTPRINT = 3,581 SQ. FT. r � INTERIOR PORTIONS OF BUILDING SHOWN FOR SCHEMATIC REFERENCE ONLY AT THIS TIME i REPRESENTING GENERAL COMPONENTS OF BUILDING USES. FINAL PLANS TO BE DEVELOPED AT FUTURE DATE. ri LOBBY J ELEV. I PRELIMINARY UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 7 A200 1/4" = 1'-0" daniels firm ARCH I T EC T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 Fax 690.5545 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: I hereby certify that this plan, specifi- cation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of M I N N ESOTA. Typed Name Registration Number Date PROJECT: 340 MEDINA, KAL CLYDESDALE POINT MN 55340 TRAIL PROJECT DRAWN CHECKED ISSUES AND NO.: 15064 BY: GGD BY: GGD REVISIONS: CITY SUBMITTAL: 11.06.2015 01 PLANNING COMMENTS: 11.06.2015 SHEET TITLE: PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS T.O. PARAPET �--'- •• r --'- --■- MIK mummuirmuftlIAMMI -El J—� .�-----J ` / -------- •-------- 1 NORTH ELEVATION A300 3/16" = 1'-0" PFM 1 BRK 1 STN-3 PFM-1 AWN 1 STN-1 // // G L-1 / / -I ..----------- .. III. A�--•-----■ ■-----1�-� --• AMMIM=1MMEN T.O. PARAPET S EL. = 27'-8" T.O. PARAPET ik mrimmivEL 2, ,0 •Mm Adk —�� —o----------••�M• --._■ PROPOSED SIGN AREA SHOWN HEAVY DASHED PFM-1 �® 111 M MI, - ----- --•-- EM ■---ftW EM ---�- ----- ■---ftW - EM EM - •M ■---- ftW EM EM_ 111111111111111111 . J------ .�■■�■■� -MMMINL ,�■ / / / / i i n r■■■■■■i n_i _ __ _.� Z"Mi ��-____------..__�` _ AWN-1 11" --1 .=-M===-1•=-M__......11..MI.L.._....IM„=.l...._-.= ■ IIII■._ IIIIII■._ IIIII■.IIIIII■._ M■—■ --------------' ---■—■ iMr ■7�� ■��- ■7m- _ —i!� , / / , // IM // / —i_i —i�i i i, m. i .�_ __ G L 1 ._ E L 1 .� / G L 2 .� ... A A i--_ i--_ _._ . iMr �—� � . . I —--- 111.11111111■ EM ■a1�L.- •-/�- �■7--■.�--■.�--i\.� — M mo. f •-rAm om i:Em-�� M BRK 1 STN-3 PFM-1 �.�■ �.�■ (7\ WEST ELEVATION \ / �r ■r�T■TAT■T�T`� - �_ _- mow � Vtim m` rk, .•••► i ■marpr,, STN 2 STN-1 STN 2 PFM-1 BRK-1 STN -1 11 A300 / 3/16" = 1'-0" KEY TO NOTES .0 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN WALK ADJACENT TO BUILDING. O INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK FACE CONCRETE BLOCK OR INTEGRAL COLORED POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL. O POURED CONCRETE STAIR. O DECORATIVE LIGHT POLES AT PATIO SEATING. O DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE LIGHT FIXTURES. O LANDSCAPED AREA ADJACENT TO BUILDING. T.O. PARAPET EL. = 27'-8" T.O. PARAPET PROPOSED SIGN AREA . SHOWN HEAVY DASHED (102 SQ. FT. MAX.), inffli - -- , •NIMIM / ----• -•--- © IN 'I _ M .IM M MM�� G L 1 MLUMMM MtMEIMIIMM fli MINMMIIIMM imEhMINIIN -'--- STN 3 _■0■0■ :�YYY ��i�■� .. STU 1 iniia � min _ 41.111.■ni PFM 1 ____________________JL_J------._----J_JL AA- _--•------ ------•--_ _--1-----• •-----•--_ _ .^ _ _ _ �TT4TTT- _ _—�■'T■'ii�■'ZT■'T■'T■Z _ —f■T■' M------- AWN-1 =■� -• ---------=—=—=1--=_ ■\-■m_iiiiiii.=mmo�=m��iiiiiii�=m��iiiiii��m,-�o�=mXN•=im�iiiiiii.--1,��-_-=1-=-=-_-_-=-m r-_.■m �` - ■ •= 0 w:m mm _ _.._ _=._�_�.� ©1i.= _w._ ffi._ _■ - ■ ---- •------------• ---- - rim■ m�•■■iiiii • 1 == M•'-a iii■=•���= iiiil..1= m'i Ei M iiiiii■1•. iiiiii■1 ■ E1=M =■ =■ ib.mmm ■= sru 1 f �= / �=�= i■—■■--■ �i■—■ i■—■ i- t\- i-i- IL a STN 1 ..il�.� ■■� it .. �. .. ■�■.I ri ii■■■� ?■ie ■ /i • � ■ :■m_i: :■�-■�: :■ii-i: :■�_i: ftwi GL 1 -t- GL 1 0..K- i� GL 2 -�- 0 i� . ■iiiiiiii■ ; it� i ■� (SLOPED)=_I i I ��,►�� ��i� /IMI=i 11111111111iNIM •Millll�rill�lllllll 111�11111111111111I :■��- :. i ■i_i�_7■�_i::■���m_ : C �: ���:':':I�� �� % 9 alll � l% 1' Ilil :Al ii�� : iIII !i i �:"+ �ia-■w/=i�■i_i�■i_.:■�_�: 0 mm:I II ■�� ��:■�I_�i l lllllll�:eiill�lllll l ii I'�Illlll:�i�l��l 1E 111IIl::ii���llll!! i�f�� _w II w_! ��: (SLOPED)�■ i II ■�-N-■�■� ��■d■ a ri�-'I � iiii!!!!iiilriiiii!! T " �iviii�i.!l!!liiiiiY ..y,- w.-____ i life II �:1!!!'-'ni-Iilll l•I--■_w—� .1mr■ m ..m �—■.■.,.w �I - INI mar L STN 1 GRL 1 STN 1 2 MMMMM ---- _- MEM ---- ---- SOUTH ELEVATION A300 3/16" = 1'-0" O (BEYOND) 1/ d REM-1 BRK 1 O STN 3 PFM-1 AWN 1 STN-1 G RL-1 - INEN- nimm ---�'- - AIMI- IMMEM- IN m .mm ------ ---,'- 1• - : simmW 01 _— �— _- �- _— �— II _,.. _Ad_ T.O. PARAPET EL. = 27'-8" T.O. PARAPET EL. = 25'-10" N PROPOSED SIGN AREA SHOWN HEAVY DASHED PFM-1 _ MM M - ___M ---- • - •MN - •1MM - • - •_• __ I MrAMMMMMMMMMIIMM=10=NNMMMIN -�� _ GL-2 / PFM-1 BRK 1 O I 1■■■■iY. --M_ 1 J---- r■�Y■■� f■ 416 (BEYOND) Y ----------------=�-3-�IIIIII■IIIIL. IIIIII■� IIIIII■IIIIL�� IIIIII■■- f�--: -_--_--_--_--_--_--_--_- ----------------- ■�--_--__- ----------- mot■ I i ���— ■------------------ ----------- _���IIIIII■.= IIIIII■.= �IIII��IIII__ = IIIImmr, Q-�■ _ ���I� �� ----------- i i ice- ■-iiallr 1 r_� m? ■=■------------------ ■IIIIII■• =i i - -- _.— e ■_------------------ IIIIII■III_ ■��i ■�Erm ■ rft: `gmq nem- �•_ il� illl■! • 77;7i• �� ■��•�■���■�mw1■- ViEsTN7 I n EAST ELEVATION A300 3/16" = 1'-0" STN-2 It_> _I_I fug tar ■mod i�%ron.;=.0ZiWamM.:MAIM=M=MM S^&milrAmWA =� STN 2 STN-3 PFM-1 AWN-1 STN 1 O PFM-1 FINISHES EXTERIOR KEY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION STONE VENEER T.B.D. DECORATIVE PREFINISHED METAL T.B.D. STN-1 REM-1 STONE SILL T.B.D. ALUMINUM FRAMING SYSTEM W/ VISION GLASS T.B.D. STN-2 GL-1 STONE SILL T.B.D. ALUMINUM FRAMING SYSTEM W/ NON -VISION GLASS T.B.D. STN-3 GL-2 BRICK VENEER T.B.D. DECORATIVE METAL GUARDRAIL T.B.D. BRK-1 GRL-1 STUCCO T.B.D. PAINTED H.M. DOOR & FRAME T.B.D. sru-1 DR-1 DECORATIVE METAL AWNING T.B.D. PREFINISHED METAL O.H. DOOR T.B.D. AWN-1 DR-2 daniels firm ARCHITECTS 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 Fax 690.5545 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: I hereby certify that this plan, specifi- cation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of M I N N ESOTA. Typed Name Registration Number Date PROJECT: 340 MEDINA, KAL CLYDESDALE POINT MN 55340 TRAIL PROJECT DRAWN CHECKED ISSUES AND NO.: 15064 BY: GGD BY: GGD REVISIONS: CITY SUBMITTAL: 11.06.2015 01 PLANNING COMMENTS: 11.06.2015 SHEET TITLE: PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS firm daniels ARCHITECTS (1`\ NORTH ELEVATION NO SCALE RESTAURANT SIGN WEST ELEVATION \l,\._01) NO SCALE RESTAUW) SIGN (Th SOUTH ELEVATION NO SCALE EAST ELEVATION NO SCALE 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 Fax 690.5545 www.fin n-daniels.com CONSULTANT: I hereby certify that this plan, specifi- cation, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Typed Name Registration Number Date PROJECT: KAL POINT 340 CLYDESDALE TRAIL MEDINA, MN 55340 PROJECT NO.: 15064 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: ISSUES AND REVISIONS: GGD GGD CITY SUBMITTAL: 11.06.2015 PLANNING COMMENTS: 11.06.2015 SHEET TITLE: PRELIMINARY EXTERIOR RENDERINGS & PERSPECTIVE A301 0.o 0.o o.0 60.o 0.0 0.o o.o 60.0 6o.o 0.0 63.o o.0 60.0 0.o 0.o 0.1 0.1 60.1 so.1 so.1 0.1 so.1 60.1 so.0 60.0 6o.1 60.0 6o.o 60 . . . .1 0.1 0.1 . . . 0.1 0.1 •0.1 0. . . . . . ..1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 =0.1 0.1 0.2 .0/3' 0.3 0.20.2.0 3: 0.2 0.3 0. 0. ■ 0. 0. • 2 0. 3 0. 2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0 3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0. 4 ;'0. ;,fi7.5 0.4 0. 4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0,".8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.9 0 5+0.8 1.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 ■ 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.7 0.6 ■ 0.4, ■• 0.8 1.3 ., 2 0.60.50.",0.72.03 a.6 0.4 0.', 0.7 2.1 3 0. 7 0 . 6 0.' 0. 9 1. 4 2` . 9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 ■ ■ 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 .0 ■ 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0 0.5 0.5 0 6 0' 5 0 0 5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0 5 0.8 0.9 0 0.6 1.3 1.2 0 0 6 1.6 2.4 0 0 6 0 6 ■ a 5 0.9 0.9 0.5,' 0.7 0. U U U ■ 4 • . 3 i . 4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0. . 3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0. 5 0.7 4 0. . 6 0 . 5 . 13 0.1 n 0.2 • 8 0 . 6 0. 5 r 0 0,/ 3 0.4 0.4 0::,3 0.2 0.2 0.2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 Q JF Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement 2 AA SINGLE 2 CC2 BACK -BACK Lum. Lumens 5190 5105 LLF Description 0.900 Kim 1 AICC17A2E35IDB100L4Kxxx (18' Mounting Height) 0.900 Kim (4)2BICC17A5E351DB180L4Kxxx (18' Mounting Height) O .1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0 4 0.3 0.. 0.3 0.. 0.4 0. 0.3 0. 0.3 O .6 0.4 O .6 0.4 .5 0.3 0. 9 0. 8 0:: 6 0. 3740 . 2 . ; • 6 Q ■ 8 1. 0 0 .;`' 0 .:' 0. 2 0. 2 0.5. 1.1 1.8 17 2 - .4 0.2 0 0 ■ 0 0.2 a.3 0.4 _ 1 0.5 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Area Illuminance Units Fc Avg 0.72 Max 3.3 Min 0.0 Avg/Min Max/Min N.A. N.A. NOT A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT - FOR DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY w Q Lo ,1- � � C.7�� E 0< c)co 0u7 p w co U Qop QMo�Q•71- 71. N 0Cnz �� E CV Q• �waDcm T ❑ � �tiw re � rQ V 4 °t: 11 ° Q 0 A -1 - 4 co c E E 0 o a) o Revisions Q_ U I CO W L ❑ COCV -0 CD ) 0 �} r CDCV co_ T '' v ❑ ' Q o II T 6 U co 4.a C ._ 0 O. CZ LTG-1 KIM LJGHTNG CC/CCS17 17`' Arm Mounted, Curvilinear, PicoEmitterTM LED revision 11/21/14 • kl_cc17aeled_spec.pdf Type: Job: Catalog number: Mtg. Fixture Electrical Module Finish ( See page 2 Select pole from Kim Arms and Poles Selection Guide. If pole is provided by others indicate O.D. for arm fitting. Options See pages 3-4 Approvals: Date: Page: 1 of 6 Specifications 17" Diameter 60 Light Emitting Diodes Total System Watts = 64W CC 17" DIA. (431.8 mm) 8„ 03.2 mm) CCS NUMMI. LIGHTING. INC 41/2" (114.3 mm) 6„ (1524 mm) I- 2„ (50.8 mm) Arm Cross - Section Housing: Spun aluminum. (Rollformed linear reveals; CC: Three equally spaced reveals, 1/2" wide, separated by 1/2" ribs, 1/4" deep. CCS: One 1/4" groove, 1/4" deep.) Sidewal Is have a maximum 1 ° of taper, and are free of welds or fasteners. A rollformed aluminum flange is hemmed into the bottom providing support for the reflector module. An internal aluminum casting provides for mounting of the electrical module plus reinforcing for side -arm mounting of the fixture. Lens Frame Assembly: One-piece cast aluminum lens frame is attached to the housing by a zinc plated cold rolled steel hinge with a stainless steel pin. Closure is by one self -retained stainless steel screw. A stainless steel self-locking stop arm is provided to hold the lens frame in the open position while servicing. A 3/is" thick clear flat tempered glass lens is fully gasketed by a one-piece extruded and vulcanized silicone gasket. Lens is retained in the frame by removable zinc plated steel clips. Standard Arm Mounting: Arm is one-piece extruded aluminum with internal bolt guides and fully radiussed top and bottom. Luminaire-to-pole attachment is by internal draw bolts, and includes a pole reinforcing plate with wire strain relief. Arm is circular cut to mate with specified round pole. Electronic Module: All electrical components are UL and CSA recognized, mounted on a single plate and factory prewired with quick -disconnect plugs. Module includes a driver, LifeShieldTM temperature control device and surge protector. Electrical module attaches to housing with key hole slots, accessible by opening the lens frame and removing optical module.. Driver is rated for -40°F starting and has a 0-10V dimming interface for multi -level illumination options. Optical Module: Precision, replaceable PicoEmitters are positioned to achieve directional control toward desired task. The entire EmitterDeckTM mounting assembly fastens to the housing as a one-piece module. Finish/Color: TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Stealth GrayTm, Platinum Silver, or White. Custom colors are available. Listed To: UL 1598 Standard for Luminaires - UL 8750 Standard for Safety for Light Emitting Diode (LED) Equipment for use in Lighting Products and CSA C22.2#250.0 Luminaires. Warranty: Kim Lighting warrants Curvilinear LED products ("Product(s)") sold by Kim Lighting to be free from defects in material and workmanship for (i) a period of five (5) years for metal parts, (ii) a period of ten (10) years for exterior housing paint finish(s), (iii) a period of six (6) years for LED Light Engines (PicoEmitter reflectors) and, (iv) a period of five (5) years for LED power components (LED Driver, LifeSh ie Id temperature control device, surge protector), from the date of sale of such goods to the buyer as specified in Kim Lighting shipment documents for each product. CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/ or local electrical codes. Failure to do so may result in serious injury. KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. © 2014 KIM LIGHTING • 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91745-1788 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/968-5716 KIM LJGNTNG CC/CCS17 17" Arm Mounted, Curvilinear, PicoEmitterTM LED revision 11/21/14 • kl_cc17aeled_spec.pdf Type: Job: Page: 4 of 6 _r- Optional Features Outdoor Occupancy Sensor Cat. No. (See right) ❑ No Option Side Pole Mount Outdoor Occupancy Sensor with 0-10VDC dimming control mounts directly to the underside of the luminaire. Vide 360° pattern. Available in voltages to match luminaire from 120 through 480VAC. Module color available in Black, Gray, or White (Picked at the factory when luminaire color is chosen, black used for dark colors), Field Adjustable Timeout settings for 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes (Factory default is 5-minutes). Field adjustable unoccupied dimming level, 20%, 50%, 60%, or 70% (Factory default is 50%). One sensor can support multiple units up to 1500 watts. (Wiring from module to luminaires) is by -others). Mounted to a cast pole adapter painted to match pole. Cat. No. ❑ SCL-R*/**/ ***- Pole Occupancy Sensor up to 16', UNV (120-347V) or 480V. Specify pole diameter. O SCL-S/**/ *** - Pole Occupancy Sensor up to 16', UNV (120-347V) or 480V. Square pole mount. ❑ SCH-R*/**/ ***-Pole Occupancy Sensor up to 30', UNV (120-347V) or 480V. Specify pole diameter. ❑ SCH-S/**/ *** - Pole Occupancy Sensor up to 30', UNV (120-347V) or 480V. Square pole mount. * Pole Diameter, **Voltage, *** Color Ordering Example: SCL-R4/277/BL Sensor Lens Coverage and Detection Patterns SCL to 16' mtg. ht. (3:1 Range ) SCH to 30' mtg. ht. (1.4:1 Range) Y = 48' 16' mtg. ht. for SCL Y = 42' 30' mtg. ht. for SCH Y 3 x mtg. ht. for SCL Y = 1.4 x mtg. ht. for SCH X= mounting ht. 96' DIA. ® 16' mpg. 84' DiAC 30' mounting ht Side View Top View Luminaire' Pole / t�ccupancy Sensor Side Pole Mount Detection Pattern Top View for Round Luminaire Mounted on Post Top NOTE: Occupancy detection is blocked directly behind pole. Install occupancy sensor as far away from pole as possible to maximize detection. Outdoor Occupancy Sensor Side Pole Mount Luminaire- Pole \,�c i'r-Vo ccupancy Sensor Side Pole Mount Deteclion Pattern Top View for Round Luminaire Mounted on Arm NOTE: For 360° coverage, install two occupancy sensors 180° apart on pole 4411 KIM LIGHiNG CC/CCS17 17 Arne Mounted, Curvilinear, PicoEmitter LED revision 11/21/14 • kl_ccl7aeled_spec.pdf Type: Job: Page: 2 of 6 s Standard Features Mounting 3Y configuration is available for round poles only. Plan View: 0- EPA: 0.9 Cat No.: M y 1.8 1.6 2.5 2.5 2.8 Wall Mount IC 01A 02B 02L 03T 03Y 04C 01W Fixture Cat. No. designates CC/ CCS fixture and light distribution. x 17 Housing: ❑ CC ❑ CCS Size: 17 = 17" Small 60 LEDs A x A = Arm Mount E35 E35 = 350mA Distribution: ❑ 1 = Type I Full Cutoff ❑ 2 = Type II Full Cutoff O 3 = Type III Full Cutoff ❑ 4 = Type IV Full Cutoff ❑ 5 = TypeV Square Full Cutoff ❑ L = Type L Left Full Cutoff ❑ R =Type R Right Full Cutoff Light Distribution: "•••,...e" dr' '41, Type I r\ Type IV Forward Throw Type II f\ Type V Square Type III i' Type R Right Type L Left Electrical Module Cat. Nos. for Electrical Modules available: 60 LxK Source: 60 = 60 LED's X Color Temperature: Voltage: ❑ 3K = 3000K ❑ 120 = 120V ❑ 4K = 4200K ❑ 208 = 208V ❑ 5K = 5100K ❑ 240 = 240V ❑ 2K = 580nm - Amber ❑ 277 = 27N ❑ 347 = 347V1 ❑ 480 = 480V 'Due to current unavailability of 347V and 480V drivers, specification of these voltages may feature an integral step-down transformer. Finish TGIC powder coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion coating. Color: Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Stealth Gray Platinum Silver White Custom Color2 Cat. No.: O BL O DB ❑ LG O SG O PS O WH O CC 2Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representative. Custom color description: Optional Features Polycarbonate Lens Cat.. No. ❑ L17F ❑ No Option Clear UV stabilized polycarbonate replaces standard flat glass lens, gasketed and integral with lens frame. CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. Useful life is limited by UV discoloration from sun light Polycarbonate Lens © 2014 KIM LIGHTING • 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91745-1788 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/968-5716 441Ik KIM LJGNTNG CC/CCS17 17" Arm Mounted, Curvilinear, PicoEmitterTM LED revision 11/21/14 • kl_cc17aeled_spec.pdf Type: Job: Page: 5 of 6 Optional Features Accent Reveals Cat. No. (See right) ❑ No Option (For CC series only) Three aluminum bands riveted inside the housing reveals. Available in five standard Kim powder coat finishes. Custom colors available. Color Black Dark Bronze Light Gray Cat No.: O BL-REV ❑ DB-REV ❑ LG-REV AccentRevealsReveals Stealth GrayTm Platinum Silver White Custom Colors' ❑ SG -REV ❑ PS -REV ❑ WH-REV ❑ CC -REV 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representative. Custom color description: Vertical Slipfitter Mounts Cat. No. includes Mounting. Cat. No. (See right) ❑ No Option Allows fixture with standard support arm to be mounted to steel poles having a 2" pipe -size steel tenon (23/8" O.D. x 41/2" min. length). 4" round or square cast aluminum with flush cap, secured by four 3/8u stainless steel set point allen screws. Pole tenon must be field drilled at one set screw location to insure against fixture rotation. Finished to match fixture. NOTE: 3Y only available on round slipfitter. Cat. No. O VSF-1A ❑ VSF-2B O VSF-2L O VSF-3T O VSF-3Y ❑ VSF-4C Round Stain less steel set screws -F I Pole with 2" pipe -size tenon (by others) "Zr*"Cat No. O SVSF-1A ❑ SVSF-2B ❑ SVSF-2L O SVSF-3T Square ❑ SVSF-4C Vertical Slipfitter Mount by Kim Mounting Configuration 1A - single arm mount 2B-2at180° 2L-2 at90° 3T - 3 at 90° 3Y - 3 at 120° 4C-4at90° Horizontal Slipfitter Mount Cat. No. ❑ HSF ❑ No Option Replaces standard mounting arm with a slipfitter which allows CC/CCS Arm Mount model to be mounted to a horizontal pole davit -arm with 2" pipe -size mounting end (23/8" O.D.). Cast aluminum slipfitter with set screw anti -rotation lock. Bolts to housing from inside the electrical compartment using mounting holes for the standard support arm. Davit -arm must be field drilled at a set screw location to insure against fixture rotation. Finished to match fixture and arm. Horizontal Slipfitter Mount Davit -arm with 2" pipe -size fixture mount (by others) Support Arm Cat. No. (See right) ❑ No Option Note: Refer to Kim Lighting's Arms & Poles Selection Guide for complete details. Arm View: j-Z Swept Swept Solid Arm Hollow Arm Upsweep Upsweep Solid Arm Hollow Arm Cat. No.: ❑ AA01 ❑ AA03 ❑ AA05 O AA07 Uplift Adjustable Uplift Admustable Aluminum Arm Stainless Steel Arm ❑ AA09 ❑ AA11 46. KIM LJGNTNG CC/CCS17 17 Arm Mounted, Curvilinear, PicoEmitter LED revision 11/21/14 • kl_cc17aeled_spec.pdf Type: Job: Page: 3 of 6 Optional Features Wall Mounting Cat. No. ❑ 1 W ❑ No Option Select from Mounting on page 2. Wall Mount: A cast mounting plate of 356 alloy, low -copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminum, is mounted to the wall with bolts (by others). Fixture and arm are mounted to a cast 356 alloy aluminum cover plate before attaching to the wall mounting plate. The fixture -arm -cover plate assembly is hooked to the wall mounting plate, and secured with stainless steel screws provided. After mounting to the wall, field splices are made at the opening in the cover plate, then covered by a cast 356 alloy aluminum plate that blends with the cover plate design. Complete fixture -arm -cover plate assembly can therefore be mounted before field splices are made. Cover plate is finished to match arm and fixture powder coat color. Wall Attachment and J-Box by Others Cover Plate Typical Architectural Arm Splice Access Cover 51Y2" (139.7 mm) 41/4" (106 mM ti9/6" (14.3 mm) 3/a o(�L I I8 (24 (269.9 m°57m) 03.3 mm) Mounting Plate CAUTION: Structural integrity of mounting plate attachment to wall is by others. Photocell Control Cat. No. (See right) ❑ No Option Factory installed photocell inside housing with a fully gasketed sensor on the side wall. For multiple fixture mountings, one fixture is supplied with a photocell to operate the others. Cat. No. ❑ A-30 ❑ A-31 ❑ A-32 ❑ A-33 ❑ A-35 ❑ A-34 Line Volts: 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V Photocell Sensor Mounting Configuration: * - Fixture with Photocell Sensor S-slave unit(s) No fixture wattage limit. *" s 1A, 1W 2B s�s s 2L 3T,3Y 4C Neighbor Friendly Optic: Cat. No. ❑ NFO ❑ No Option Integrated Neighbor Friendly Optic on each PicoEmitter' module to completely control unwanted backlight Most effective with Type III and IV distibutions. TYPE III-NFO TYPE IV-NFO 0-10V Dimming Interface Driver has a 0-10V dimming interface with a dimming range of 10-100%. Is compatible with most control systems including Hubbell Building Automation wiHUBB . Approved dimmers include Lutron Diva AVTV, Lutron Nova NFTV and NTFTV. Note: Not compatible with current sourcing dimmers. Controls compatible via Gray and Purple dimming lead. Fixture Housing Standard Input Black + White - Green GND Gray Dimmin. Lead (-) Purple Dimming Lead 4- 30 mA Max © 2014 KIM LIGHTING • 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91745-1788 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/968-5716 4,1k KIM LIGNTNG CC/CCS17 17" Arm Mounted, Curvilinear, PicoEmitterTM LED revision 11/21/14 • kl_cc17aeled_spec.pdf Type: Job: Page: 6 of 6 s 1 Lumen Data Spectrorad iometric 3000K Average 4200K Average 5100K Average Correlated Color Temp. CCT (K) 2800K-3175K 3800K4600K 4600K-5600K Color Rendering Index (CRI) >80 >80 >70 Power Factor >.90 >.90 >.90 Projected Lumen Maintenance mA 100,000 his (Calculated L70) 350 93.22% 584,00 hrs. Electrical Drive Current Volts - AC Amps - AC System Watts 120 0.56 67 2 08 0.32 67 240 0.28 67 277 0.24 67 347 0.19 67 480 0.14 67 B.U.G. Rating (TM15) in Lumens wher B = Backlight, U = Uplight, G = Glare Temperature TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 3 NFO TYPE 4 TYPE 4 NFO TYPE 5 TYPE L/R 3000K B2 UO G2 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G1 BO UO G1 B2 UO G1 TBD 4200K B3 UO G3 B2 UO G2 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G2 B1 UO G1 B3 UO G1 TBD 5100K B3 UO G3 B2 UO G2 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G1 B1 UO G2 B1 UO G1 B3 UO G1 TBD Absolute Lumens Temperature TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 3 NFO TYPE 4 TYPE 4 N FO TYPE 5 TYPE L/R 3000K 3861 3959 3931 3248 3912 3294 3971 TBD 4200K 5062 5190 4972 4258 5129 4319 5206 TBD 5100K 5426 5564 5524 4564 5581 4626 5576 TBD LED performance and lumen output continues to improve at a rapid pace. Log onto www.kimlighting.com to download the most current photometric files from Kim Lighting's IES File Library. For custom optics and color temperature configurations, contact factory. LIGHT FIXTURE CUT SHEETS © 2014 KIM LIGHTING • 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91745-1788 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/968-5716 © 2014 KIM LIGHTING • 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91745-1788 • TEL 626/968-5666 • FAX 626/968-5716 © 2014 KIM LIGHTING • 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91745-1788 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/968-5716 LTG-2 0 2015 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance Westwood Y Pr limin r Planse a for Existing Conditions -Removals, Site, Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, Utilities, and Landscape for Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Contact: Kalyan Chakravarthy Phone: (952)905-9309 Email: contactkalyan@hotmail.com Prepared by: Westwood Phone Fax Toll Free (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Project number: 0007193.00 Contact: Paul D. Schroeder Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title Cl Cover Sheet C2 Existing Conditions — Removals C3 Site Plan C4 Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan C5 Utility Plan C6 Details C7 Details C8 Details Cg Landscape Plan Vicinity Map 4ertir-9 R rdesdOe Treat `Medina Ines Imo,. er SITE ,1161-55 f-/16rurn tin Off mr.hax �mX'Y Pi= Dower Soldiery aye".. al I Clydesdale Tray' ji:¢1b7� U Jen Dr E (Not to Scale) Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone Fax Toll Free (952) 937-5150 (952) 937-5822 (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Designed: Checiced: Drawn PDS / SLA / RAH PDS / SLA PDS / SLA / RAH Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 00 11 /06/2015 CITY SUBMITTAL Q01 12/21 /2015 CITY COMMENTS Not For Construction Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Cover Sheet Date: 11/06/2015 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) C1 of C9 Sheet: 0007193cv.dwg 0 2015 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance FLARED END SECTION (12) _ \ R.E. = 974.01 POND EDGE - FLARED END SECTION (36") - R.E.=970.65 \\ I I I I DR°INAGE AND UTILITY \� E SEMENT PER MEDINA C YDESDALE MARKETPLACE EX. 8" DIP SAN SAN OCS R.E. = 985.38 j I.E.=(W) 978.84 REMOVE STORM PIPE SAW CUT LINF� (TYP.) REMOVE BITUMINOUS (TYPN REMOVE AND RELOCATE MISCELLANEOUS UTILITIES (TYP.) REMOVE SIGN (TYP.) I.E.=(E)979.92 C3; — 980 — \ .B� "1R RT (?4 83 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER STRUCTURES (REMOVE METAL LID) APPX. LOCATION 0 STORM PIPE/MH ELEVATIONS PER PLANS (NOT FIELD VERIFIED) I.E. _ (N)979.33 I.E. _ (S)979.38 I.E. _ (W)980.15 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER MEDINA --- CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE CATCH BASIN -. . - • 81.77 - \ TREE TO REMAIN (TYP.) -rdrCH BASIN R.E. 10.78 REMOVE CURB AND UTTER ( YP.) �\ Fj- SANITARY R.E. 987.64 E.=(0969.89 CATCH BASIN R.E. = 989.03 I. E=(N)979. 78 1-E,=(W)979.88 FLARED END SECTION (12) - , R.E.=979.27 \\ H AREA --CANOPY BUILDING Removal Legend EXISTING REMOVALS SAN WAT WAT STO GAS PUG POH TUG TOH FOP CTV .11 1 1 1 1 1 I • SAN —ejs WAT WAT—Poiet. STO ‘1 SB-19 SB-19 PROPERTY LINE CURB & GUTTER SAW CUT PAVEMENT SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN HYDRANT STORM SEWER GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE BITUMINOUS BUILDING TREE LIGHT POLE TRAFFIC SIGN SOIL BORING LOCATION TREE LINE Existing Conditions and Removal Notes 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. SURVEY BASED ON CLYESDALE MARKETPLACE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, DATED MARCH 27TH, 2013, REVISED MAY 9TH, 2013. INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATA, BY WESTWOOD, SEPTEMBER 2015. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 5. PROPERTY INFO: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ADDRESS: PROPERTY ID: PROPERTY AREA: IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: ELEVATION BLOCK 1, LOT 4 — MEDINA CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE 340 CLYDESDALE TRAIL, MEDINA, MN #1211823130035 32,778 SF(0.75 ACRES) 1,150 SF(3.5%) DRIPLINE ORANGE MESH CONSTRUCTION FENCE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON PLAN. MAINTAIN MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM TRUNK POSSIBLE. 6' METAL FENCE POST. STAKE EVERY 6' MAXIMUM. 6' MAX. T " POST OR EQUAL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE STAKED EVERY 6' 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. 2. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE —LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY. 3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. TREE PROTECTION LAST REVISED: 05/28/15 Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone Fax Toll Free (952) 937-5150 (952) 937-5822 (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 00 11 /06/2015 CITY SUBMITTAL Q01 12/21 /2015 CITY COMMENTS SLA / RAH SLA / PDS RAH I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota Shari L Ahrens Date:12/21/2015 License No 42797 Not For Construction Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Existing Conditions - Removals Date: Sheet: 11/06/2015 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) C2 of C9 0007193ex.dwg 0 2015 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance General Site Notes Westwood Site Develo • EXISTING ZONING: went Summar • PARCEL DESCRIPTION: • ADDRESS: • PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NO. • PROPERTY AREA: • PERVIOUS SURFACE: • IMPERVIOUS SURFACE(RATIO): • IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PUD: • BUILDING GROSS SIZE: RESTAURANT(1 ST FLOOR): OFFICE(2ND FLOOR): • FLOOR—AREA—RATIO(FAR): • BUILDING SETBACK PER CODE: • PARKING SETBACK: • PARKING SPACE/DRIVE AISLE: PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 1, LOT 4 — MEDINA CLYDESDALE MARKETPLACE 340 CLYDESDALE TRAIL, MEDINA, MN 55340 #1211823130035 32,778 SF (0.75 AC) 10,372 SF (31.6%) (7,181 SF GREEN SPACE + 3,191 SF PERVIOUS PAVEMENT) 22,406 SF (68.4%) 23,087 SF (70.4%) / 0.53 AC. (ALLOWED) 7,162 SF 3,581 SF 3,581 SF 0.22 25'=FRONT 15'=SIDE 25'=REAR PUD=FRONT AND ROW PUD=SIDE AND REAR 9' WIDE X 19' LONG, MIN. 22' AISLE • PARKING RATIO REQUIREMENT — CITY OF MEDINA RESTAURANT: 1 SPACE / 3 SEATS OFFICE 1 SPACE / 250 SF OF BLDG RESTAURANT(120 SEATS) OFFICE(3.581 SF) TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: • PARKING PROVIDED: ON —SITE: OFF —SITE: 40 SPACES (INCLUDES PATIO SEATING) 15 SPACES 55 SPACES 55 SPACES 36 SPACES 19 SPACES (SHOPPING CENTER) EXISTING TRAIL PROPERTY LINE cs 0 I -. - #-- •-- ---�� #A tt' R • EXISTING TRAIL RESTURANT ENTRANCE OFFICE ENTRANCE PROPOSED 2-STORY BLDG. TWO—STORY = 7,162 SF FOOTPRINT = 3,581 SF RESTAURANT = 1ST FLOOR OFFICE = 2ND FLOOR 13 J 12 .2 5' E3U-kh S.1 S.3 I t+� J DING SETBACK `1�1 T}oO• �J 10.0' PROPERTY LINE 9.0' (TYP.) A A I r Fry. 0 N N 25' BUILD NG S TBACK 10.0' S.3 2 4.0' .a ♦ariaj�' .= ♦♦ 1 � ♦♦♦♦ �� ,ti `., ' i ro# • 114.E .� • T d —TRANSFORM E FROPE�INE EX. TRAIL I CLYDESDALE TRAIL DEVELOPMENT UNDER CONSTRUCTION I © 3,4 0 0 EXISTING TRAIL O / • / I / / TRAM 30'+/— ACCESS EASEMENT TO CITY FOR COMMON STORM PIPE FES ACCESS WELLS FARGO BANK OFF —SITE PARKING PROVIDE NECESSARY SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS AT REQUIRED OFF —SITE PARKING, FIELD VERIFY. 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION REFER TO SHEET C2 — EXISTING CONDITIONS — REMOVALS. 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS. 6. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 9. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. Site Legend 0 EXISTING PROPOSED • I I I I I I I • x M Site Details x e a PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK PERVIOUS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT STANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST 1 B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, POST, AND BOLLARD 3 ACCESSIBLE PARKING LOGO, STRIPING, & SIGNAGE (TYP.) 4 TRAFFIC ARROW (TYP.) 5 STANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) 6 PERVIOUS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) 7 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) 8 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) 9 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT (TYP.) 10 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL (TYP.) 11 FLUSH CURB 12 CONCRETE STAIR AND RAILING 1 T' s F ;i� 14 ORNAMENTAL FENCE — TOP OF WALL 15 BIKE RACK O Site Notes A 4" WHITE PARKING STRIPE (TYP.) B MATCH INTO EXISTING CURB & GUTTER C MATCH INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT D SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) E EXISTING STOP SIGN TO REMAIN F INTERIOR TRASH ENCLOSURE DOOR G LANDSCAPE AREA (TYP.) T-A►SF•R E' P_D PATIO FENCE (TYP.) — SEE ARCHITECTURE L H L•C i 10 Y' — EE LIGHTING/PHOTOMETRIC PLAN K EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN L TRANSITION FROM FLUSH CURB TO FULL CURB (sic)) Sign Legend Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone Fax Toll Free (952) 937-5150 (952) 937-5822 (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: Drawn: PDS PDS / sr.A PDS / RAH Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 00 11 /06/2015 CITY SUBMITTAL Q01 12/21 /2015 CITY COMMENTS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota Shari L Ahrens 12/21/2015 License No.42797 Not For Construction Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Site Plan 0' 20' 40' 6 0' REFERENCE S.1 NO LEFT TURN c S.3 NO PARKING SIZE 24" X 24" 12" X 12" MnDOT DESIGNATION R3-2 Date: Sheet: 11/06/2015 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) C3 of C9 0007193sp.dwg 0 2015 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance Grading Notes Westwood Grading Legend EXISTING - 980 - 982 STo ED WA T SAN CL YDESDALE 91 .0r Qt!t SB-19 PROPOSED 980 _ 982 - . SFr ► Pk2:43 2 s��Is�� X 91.00 1.50% R E.O.F. 85.00 SB-19 0 O SAN WA T GAS PUG WA T l �CL YDESD SAN PROPERTY LINE INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL CONTOUR CURB AND GUTTER POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL SILT FENCE STORM SEWER FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL DRAIN TILE RIDGE LINE GRADING LIMITS ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SOIL BORING LOCATION INLET PROTECTION GAS PUG (?3,o / WAT- WA T 985.25 985.50 987.50 065 986. 0 987.15 985.95 985.50 987.20 -984 50 �984.80 986.00 n 986.35 988.05 984.50 00 985.10 985.60 , .mew 983.60 ` 987.10e 985.10��jdQ� 987.00 "-RISER 988.60 188.60 I \989.20 989.00 ►►► -986 986.00 987.90-, 988 .;: TAPER CUR TO FLUSH PROPOSED 2-STORY BLDG. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE \ CLYDESDALE TRAIL WA T WAT 986.57 MATCH EX. 986.71 MATCH EX. REGIONAL STORM POND 984 BO WELLS FARGO BANK 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. 6. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THIS SHEET. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING 8. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 9. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITE GRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATING AGENCIES. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDED A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. 12. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 13. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKING MINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY -LOADED TANDEM -AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OR APPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN. 14. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 15. EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2. 16. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. Erosion Control Notes 1. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND SITE IN ALL FILL AREAS AND LOCATIONS WHERE STORM WATER RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE SITE, PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION 3. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION OF THE PROJECT AREA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED CATCH BASIN INSERTS, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE. CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO OR EQUIVALENT) AROUND ALL CATCH BASIN GRATE INLETS, AFFECTED BY THIS 5. ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR BE HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER, RESTORATION WITH SOD OR WOOD FIBER BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 7. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAULING SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS. STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE COMPLETED DAILY. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 SLA SLA SLA Record Drawing by/date I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I Eun a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Shari L Ahrens Date: License No. Not For Construction Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan 11/06/2015 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) U 2015 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance General Utility Notes Westwood CL YDESDALE J Q cc OJ SAN WA T GAS PUG j a SAN FLARED END SECTION (12') _ \ R.E.=974.01 \ / POND EDGE FLARED END SECTION (36") - \ R.E=970.65 \\ GAS wF GAS WA i \ \ STORM MANHOL SEARCHED AREA BURIED STRUCTURE APPX. LOCATION OF STORM PIPE PER AS -BUILT PLAN GAS REMOVE AP AND EXTEND 15" STM RCP 10f LF RCP ® 0.65% (FIELD VERIFY) (ES`Y. IE=980.8) �CL YDE`SDALE'AN STo �Ns» EX. 12" RCP - STo STo FIELD VERIFY 15" RCP STIwPFPE, OR PROVIDE ADD ALTERNATE FOR COMPLETE PIPE CONNECTIONS AND gsgop ,-ripA wAT WAT- I OCS . R.E.=985.38 /l I.E.=(W) 978.84 1 -POND EDGE I I I I _- - - - EX. 24" (VERIFY) STM RCP I carcH BASIN =981.77 -\ 5LF ® 2.00% 17 \ IE=983.40 IE=983.00 CB-102 RIM=983.50 IE=979.27 IE(SW)=980.50 4' SUMP CONSTRUCT ON EXISTING PIPE 0 LF 8" DRAINTIIIE @ .5% 41 -/ 2LF8"D AINTIE®0.5% d 0 IE=983.16 S� I hO� 'cb h�R.P OF MH ELEVATIONS Pc NS (NOT FIELD ,ED) R.E.-y86.75-� I.E=(14979.33 \\\ 54 LF-12" STM RCP LE=(S \ 979.38 ® 1.20% LE=(I4A)980.15 I I - <I 1 r. I �' 1 IE=984.05 FFE=989.20 PROPOSED 2-STORY BLDG. REMOVE SAN CAP EST. EX. IE=969.26 ® 2.5% EXTEND 6" PVC SAN 7 LF ® 2.5% EST IE=969.44 FDC r J PUG 0 SAN (- EX. 8" DIP SAN SAN - i 0 /p„ CATCH BASIN / R.E=984.80 y I.E.=(NW 9 - I P c 2 7 -(E �79.92 CLYDES ✓ ALE 5T0 U Mil STO TRAIL WA SAN L WA T REMOVE • LF OF 8" PV WM / 1 sTo I 1 1 1 14 LF-2" DOMESu ITH 2" CURB/CORPOR' DOS 1:4 r' TEE AND FOR 8X6 2 414 12 LF-6" FIRE PVC WM EX. HYDRANT TH PIV 001 v k1/4 T / co 0 O / oQ co s4N \\ SANITARY " \--R.E. 987.64 I. E=(0969.89 0/zi q -: r• I I 6" �q i _ FLARED END SECTION (24') 7- R.E.=979.24 I 1 I I I I I I I / I I \ EX. 24" RCPI _ FLARED END SECTION (30') R.E. = 978.94 I \ \ FLARED END 7CTION (12")- RECONSTRUCT E=979.27 \\ STM MH - 103 \\ RIM=984.10' \ (FIELD VERIFY AND MATCH EX. INV.) EX. IE=(NE) 24" 979.17 EX. IE=(S) 21" 979.17 \ EX. IE=(W) 24" 979.17 CATCH BASIN R.E=990.29 LE=(NW)982.39 I.E. = (S)982.45 RECONSTRUCT STM MH 10 RIM=987.9 (FIELD VERIFY A MA EX. IE=(N) " 9 3 EX. IE=(S) 18'' 979. EX. IE=(E)UNKNOWN EX. IE=(W) 12" REMO IE=(SW) 12" 983.40 4 11 CATCH BASIN R.E.=989.03 I.E.=(N)979.78 I:E•=(W)979.88 EX. HYDR q Q Q)/N Q) \\ _ TRA V47 q TU G � , 41tt o I I I CATCH .:ASIN \ R.E.=99 70 I.E.=(N)9 ':.05 /.E.=(E)979'0¢5 ,,--CANOPY NV.) K HEAD H AREA \ \ BUILDING WELLS FARGO BANK 4 qN \ \ T 0' 20' 40' 60' 0 0 1 MI/ 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES. 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS. 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS, AND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH, CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO, OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS. ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JOINT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS. FITTINGS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE WATER MAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS PER CITY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS. 9. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER MAIN CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. 10. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 11. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 12. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE, CLASS 52 WITH 7.5' MINIMUM COVER. PROVIDE MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18" FROM SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER. INSULATE WATER MAIN IF LESS THAN 7.5' OF COVER. 13. INSULATION SHALL BE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, WITH 4 INCHES OF THICKNESS. 14. SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR 35 OR 26. SDR 26 IS REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. SANITARY SEWER PIPE WITHIN 5 FEET OF BUILDING AND UNDER FOOTINGS, PIPE SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. 15. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" AND SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) WITH R-4 GASKETS, OR HDPE STORM SEWER PIPE IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY. HDPE STORM PIPE SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M294, TYPE S WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED. PVC STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASH GUARDS & RIP -RAP. 16. POST INDICATOR VALVES SHALL BE MUELLER A-20806 (OR EQUIVALENT) MEETING AWWA STANDARD C509 AND CITY STANDARDS. VALVE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINT RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE. POST TO BE ADJUSTABLE FOR 8 FEET WATER MAIN DEPTH. 17. AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS -BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS -BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST -CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. Utility Legend EXISTING PROPOSED SAN FM STo WA T WA T O GAS GAS PUG PUG POH POH TUG TUG TOH TOH FOP CTV FOP CTV Otq Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone Fax Toll Free (952) 937-5150 (952) 937-5822 (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: SLA SLA Drawn: PDS Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 00 11 /06/2015 CITY SUBMITTAL Q01 12/21 /2015 CITY COMMENTS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota Shari L Ahrens 12/21/2015 License No.42797 Not For Construction Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN STORM SEWER WATER MAIN HYDRANT GAS UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC CABLE TELEVISION DRAIN TILE GATE VALVE FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) LIGHT POLE VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Utility Plan Date: Sheet: 11/06/2015 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) C5 of C9 0007193ut.dwg 0 2015 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance .975 WA T APPROXI \ IRRIG \ALL D T SAN 1 RAIRI CASCADE WILLOW Plant Schedule CODE OL �2 E 3, 4, 5 COLORADO SPRUCE 12' HT. 11114fr), -980— �E '4„,., - 1 Low ere r4 I ►, i PROPOSED/ 2-STORY BL G. — SHREDDED HARDW00 MULCH (TYP.) N` CO eallaillialiall1■■■■■: Z--- � WAT I EI�1 Slfl°2 E PAN. IS A r NOT BLOCKED BY LANDSCAP — sAN PLANTIN C YDESDALE` TRAIL / STo QTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME 9—PWW 2—BOULDER 7—SDO 6—MNS 5—JWS 0 6 SWAMP WHITE OAK 3" 1—CBS /2. 0 LOW SHRUBS FOR ACCESS A FDG� I —KFG OOR OF 0' 20' 40' ROOT CONDITION/ SIZE CONTAINER CLASS OVERSTORY TREE 8 ABM 8 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE / ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERS RED' B &B 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS TREE 1 CBS 1 COLORADO SPRUCE / PICEA PUNGENS B &B 6' HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE 9 PFC 2 PRAIRIEFIRE CRAB / MALUS 'PRAIRIEFIRE' B &B 1.5" CAL. RVB 4 NORTHERN REDBUD / CERCIS CANADENSIS B &B 1.5" CAL. WSB 3 WHITESPIRE BIRCH / BETULA POPULIFOLIA B &B 1.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUB 4 SGJ 4 SEA GREEN JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'SEA GREEN' #5 CONT. 4'-0" O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUB 19 DBH ANH JWS 8 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE / DIERVILLA LONICERA 6 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA / HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANNABELLE' 5 JAPANESE WHITE SPIREA / SPIRAEA ALBIFLORA #5 CONT. #5 CONT. #5 CONT. 3'-0" O.C. 4'-0" O.C. 3'-0" O.C. PERRENIALS 227 BJD SDO PWW MNS KFG 52 BAJA DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'BAJA' 65 STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY / HEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA DE ORO' 9 POW WOW WILDBERRY ECHINACEA / ECHINACEA PURPUREA 'POW WOW WILDBERRY' 12 MAY NIGHT SALVIA / SALVIA X NEMOROSA 'MAY NIGHT' #1 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. 89 KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' #1 CONT. 18" 0. C. 12" 0. C. 18" 0. C. 18" 0. C. 24" O.C. 6 0' ABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER SP. = SPREAD QTY .= QUANTITY NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. Landscape Notes 1. VERIFY ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITE WORK. 2. ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS, ARE TO BE SEEDED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SEEDING TO BE PER MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STARDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2000 EDITION AND PER 2007 SEEDING MANUAL. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS WEEDS. MATCH INTO EXISTING, AS APPLICABLE. ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED OR POTENTIAL EROSION AREAS, OR AS REQUIRED. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON PLAN, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF PLAN AND SCHEDULE DO NOT MATCH. ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, LATEST VERSION. ADD FERTILIZER, HERBACIDE, AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH. 4. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12" TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE BEDS. ADD SOIL AMENDMENTS FOR OPTIMUM PLANT GROWTH. ALL PARKING ISLAND GRADES SHALL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT CROWN. 5. ALL PLANTING BEDS TO BE EDGED WITH COMMERCIAL GRADE STEEL EDGING, POWDER COATED COLOR BLACK, ANCHORED 4' O.C. WITH METAL SPIKES. 6. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SHALL BE COLORED, RED CANYON BY SYLVA, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AND AT A MINIMUM 4" DEPTH, FREE OF ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BYRAN RED ROCK, 1 1/2" - 3" DIAMETER, AND AT A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC, WITH 4" OVERLAP AND ANCHORED. OWNER TO APPROVE OF MULCH. 7. ROCK COBBLESTONES TO BE A VARIETY OF SMOOTH FIELD STONES RANGING IN SIZE APPROXIMATELY 4" TO 12" DIAMETER, AND FIRMLY ANCHORED IN THE GROUND, MATCH EXISTING. INFILL GAPS, WITH SMALLER, SIMILAR ROCK, AS REQUIRED. BOULDER TO BE LIMESTONE(TAN) APPROXIMATELY 24" WIDE X 24" HIGH X 36" LONG OR CUBE IN SHAPE, ROUGH FACE AND FLAT BOTTOM, ANCHORED FIRMLY ON TOP OF GROUND AND LEVEL. OWNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE PRIOR TO DELIVERY. 8. SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RING, EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A RING TO THE DRIP LINE. 9. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS, THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SHALL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESIRABLE LIMBS AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE AND COMPLETED BY A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF -SITE PER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 10. CONTRACTOR TO WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALLATION AND DURING ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD. VOLUME OF WATER TO BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH. 10. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL FOR ONE-YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AND OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE. 11. PROPERTY SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED(BLOWN-OUT) AFTER THE FIRST OPERATIONAL SEASON AND SHALL PROVIDE STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING. IRRIGATION SHALL HAVE TWO-YEAR WARRANTY ON PARTS AND LABOR FOLLOWING INSTALLATION APPROVAL BY OWNER. PROVIDE BACKFLOW DEVICE, WATER METER, BOOSTER PUMP, CONTROLLER, RAIN SENSOR, WIRES, VALVE BOXES, SLEEVING, VALVES, ROTORS, SPRAYS, AND OTHER ACCESSORIES FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. NO PUBLIC WATER ALLOWED FOR IRRIGATION USE. CONNECT TO SHOPPING CENTER IRRIGATION SYSTEM, THAT REUSES STORM POND WATER. MODIFY SYSTEM ACCORDINGLY. 12. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS TO BE ADDRESSED AT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT. IL.�!II I��.. I1E1III 'II I 1 L2.0 Tree Planting Detail NOT TO SCALE FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN EXISTING SOIL 12" STEEL STAKES TO LOCK INTO PREFORMED LOOPS ON THE EDGING (MINIMUM SPACING 4' O.C.). PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. TREE WRAP MATERIAL(FOR DECIDUOUS TREES) FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. COMMERCIAL GRADE STEEL EDGING COLOR: BLACK POWDER COAT SPECIFIED MULCH PLANTING BED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. SPECIFIED TOPSOIL Plant Legend OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREES CONIFEROUS TREES Landscape Requirements LOT 4 AREA PER PUD. SHRUBS / VINES PERENNIALS EDGER �0111 111. APPROXIMATE SOD AND IRRIGATION LIMITS ■ COBBLESTONES DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED PER PUD PLANS: 13 DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREES PROVIDED: 13 (5 EXISTING TREES + 8 PROPOSED TREES) CONIFEROUS TREES REQUIRED PER PUD PLANS: 8 CONIFEROUS TREES PROVIDED: 8 (7 EXISTING TREES + 1 PROPOSED TREE) ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED PER PUD PLANS: 9 ORNAMENTAL TREES PROVIDED: 9 (0 EXISTING TREES + 9 PROPOSED TREE) TOTAL TREES REQUIRED PER PUD PLANS: 30 TOTAL TREES PROVIDED: 30 (12 EXISTING TREES + 18 PROPOSED TREES) Existing Tree Inventory # SPECIES 1 COLORADO SPRUCE 2 COLORADO SPRUCE 3 COLORADO SPRUCE 4 COLORADO SPRUCE 5 COLORADO SPRUCE 6 SWAMP WHITE OAK 7 COLORADO SPRUCE 8 COLORADO SPRUCE 9 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 10 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 11 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 12 PRAIRIE CASCADE WILLOW 2 L2.0 CAL IN./HT. 12' 12' 12' 12' 12' 3" 12' 12' 4" 4" 4" 4" STATUS SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED SAVED REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, AND SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASE MOUND, MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC, AS INDICATED) EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. DEPTH PER CONTAINER SOIL DEPTH BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED PLANTING SOIL OR AS APPROVED SET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR MILD COMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCH FINISH GRADE Shrub & Perennial Planting Detail NOT TO SCALE .L Westwood Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone Fax Toll Free (952) 937-5150 (952) 937-5822 (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Designed: Checked: PDS / RAH PDS Drawn RAH Record Drawing by/date: Revisions: 00 11 /06/2015 CITY SUBMITTAL 01 12/21 /2015 CITY COMMENTS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul D. Schroeder Date: License12/21/2015 No 25820 Not For Construction Prepared for: Kal Stay, LLC 3169 Fernbrook Lane North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Kal Point Medina, Minnesota Landscape Plan 3 L3.0 Steel Edging Detail NOT TO SCALE Date: Sheet: 11/06/2015 (ORIGINAL ISSUE) C9 of C9 0007193p1.dwg Agenda Item # 8C MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; though City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: December 28, 2015 MEETING: January 5, 2016 City Council SUBJ: Just for Kix — Rezoning from UH-2 to CH -RR — 45 Highway 55 Review Deadline 120-day Review Deadline: March 3, 2016 Overview of Request Just for Kix has requested a rezoning of property at 45 Highway 55, located east of the Aldi site, to the southeast of Highway 55 and Sioux Drive. The property is currently zoned Uptown Hame1-2 and the applicant has requested that the property be rezoned to Commercial Highway - Railroad, consistent with the Aldi property and the properties to the west of Sioux Drive. The applicant has requested the rezoning in anticipation of purchasing the property and making an application to construct their facility on the subject site. Generally, the City reviews rezoning requests within the context of a development proposal, or the City initiates rezonings in order to address changes in policy. However, applicants may also request a rezoning as a stand-alone application as in this case. The property which Just for Kix is pursuing is split by the Medina/Plymouth boundary, which is the reason the applicant is requesting a rezoning in both cities prior to a full development proposal. A concept plan of what they may request to construct on the site was submitted by the applicant and is attached for reference. The current request deals only with the zoning of the property, not the proposed construction specifically. The City rezoned the Aldi property to the CH -RR zoning district approximately 2 %z years ago at the request of the previous property owner. This rezoning occurred prior to the applicant having a specific interested user for the site. The regulations for the UH-2 zoning district can be found in Section 834.2 and the regulations for the CH -RR zoning district can be found in Section 838 of the City Code. Analysis The City places property into particular zoning district in order to achieve the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. The subject property is guided "Mixed Use -Business" in the City's Comprehensive Plan (see excerpt from Future Land Use Map on the following page). Just for Kix — 45 Highway 55 Page 1 of 4 January 5, 2016 Rezoning City Council Meeting The Comp Plan describes this use as follows: Mixed -Use Business (MU-B) provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on one site including two or more of the following: residential, general business, commercial, or office. Residential densities in this designation will be between 7.0 units per acre and 45.0 units per acre across the entire area and may include some vertically integrated uses. The mixed -use business areas will be served by urban services. Map 5-2 IYlG1.,011.1, Future Land Use Plan Guide Plan Rural Residential Agriculture Developing -Post 2030 Low Density Res 2.0 - 3.49 UTA Medium Density Res 3.5 - 6.99 UTA High Density Res 7 - 30 LEA Mixed Use 3.5 - 6.99 UTA Mixed Use - Business 7 - 45 UTA Commercial General Business Industrial Business Private Recreation (PREC) The Comp Plan establishes the following objectives for the land use. Mixed -Use The mixed -use designations focus on integrating a mix of uses to help promote housing and commercial diversity within the community. Such mixed -use designations are concentrated along the TH 55 corridor to promote a more compact development pattern in proximity to existing infrastructure and will include residential and commercial components with ratios of use determined by topography and market conditions. Mixed -use areas are all located in the urban service area. Just for Kix — 45 Highway 55 Page 2 of 4 January 5, 2016 Rezoning City Council Meeting Objectives: 1. Allow a mix of residential and commercial uses to co -exist on adjacent parcels as well as within the same structure or on the same parcel. 2. Create flexible zoning standards that would allow for a mix of residential and commercial uses on parcels that preserve the City's open space and natural features. 3. Consider alternatives for meeting parking requirements including parking in the rear of buildings, shared parking, on -street, underground, or ramp parking. 4. Use building standards that enhance and maintain the small town heritage and traditional small-town look including brick facades, traditional street lighting, overhangs over the sidewalk, boardwalks, and the like. 5. Involve residents, businesses, community groups and other stakeholders in the planning of these areas. 6. Create master plans for mixed -use areas to ensure integration of uses and responsiveness to adjacent land uses. 7. Establish design criteria for platting and developing site plans which will be compatible with surrounding physical features, existing land uses and the preservation of ecologically significant natural resources. The subject property is included in the Mixed Use -Business land use, along with the broader area along Hamel Road. However, similar to the Aldi site, the property is separated from the larger Mixed Use -Business area by steep topography to the north. The property has been zoned Uptown Hamel since the inception of the UH zoning district in 2001. The sketch plan for UH showed retail/business development in the area. The City included the property within the UH-2 "sub district" when rezoning property in 2010. The UH-2 district allows smaller -scale retail uses and also allows residential development. However, the UH-2 zoning district does not allow highway -oriented uses. The Hamel Station commercial development to the west of Sioux Drive is guided Commercial in the Comp Plan and was rezoned to CH -RR in 2010. An excerpt from the Zoning Map can be found to the right. In determining whether to rezone the property to CH -RR, the City should Just for Kix — 45 Highway 55 Pagc Rezoning UR- Urban Residential 7 determine if the proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and achieves the policies and objectives of the City. While most of the property which is guided Mixed Use -Business in the Comprehensive Plan is zoned UH, there are some exceptions. Staff believes that using a series of zoning districts in order to implement the objectives of the Mixed Use land uses is not inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. For example, allowing for a CH -RR zoning district in a portion of the Mixed Use -Business land use and a residential zoning district in another portion of the land use could, together, "allow for a mix of residential and commercial uses to co -exist on adjacent parcels..." If the Planning Commission and City Council decide that both the UH-2 and CH -RR zoning districts could implement the Mixed Use -Business land use, the next thing to consider is which district is the preferable way to carry out the Plan and meet the objectives of the City. As mentioned, the UH-2 zoning district does not generally allow highway -oriented uses. The subject property is in closer proximity to Highway 55 and other highway -oriented commercial development to the west then the remaining Mixed Use -Business land. The access to the site is not as convenient as the Aldi site, but the property does have frontage on Highway 55. If the City determines that highway oriented commercial uses are more appropriate, and/or that residential uses are not appropriate, the CH -RR zoning district may be a better fit. Review Criteria/Planning Commission Recommendation The City has a great deal of discretion when determining how to zone property because it is a legislative action. As noted in Section 825.35, "amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately but shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed rezoning at their December 8 meeting. The current property owner appeared at the hearing and expressed their support for the rezoning. Following the hearing the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning with the following condition: The applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the rezoning request. Potential Motion Move to direct staff to prepare an ordinance rezoning the property at 45 Highway 55 to Commercial -Highway Railroad with the condition recommended by the Planning Commission. Attachments 1. Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Planning Commission minutes 2. Document List 3. Applicant Narrative 4. Concept Plan Just for Kix — 45 Highway 55 Page 4 of 4 January 5, 2016 Rezoning City Council Meeting Project: LR-15-169 —Just for Kix Rezoning The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 11/6/2015 11/6/2015 3 Application Y Fee 11/6/2015 11/5/2015 1 Fee Y Mailing Labels 11/6/2015 11/3/2015 5 Labels Y Narrative 11/6/2015 11/6/2015 2 Narrative Y Concept Plan 11/6/2015 11/3/2015 1 Concept Plan 11-6-2015 Y Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Engineering Comments 11-12-2015 1 EngComments Legal Commetns 11-12-2015 1 Legal Comments Planning Commission Report 12-8-2015 4 PCReport—12-08-2015 6 pages w/ attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes Planning Commission minutes 12/8/2015 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Just for Kix — Rezoning from UH-2, Uptown Hame1-2 to CH -RR, Commercial- Highway/Railroad (45 State Highway 55) — Public Hearing Finke stated that the applicant is presented this rezoning request in anticipation of a future commercial development request. He stated that the request is complicated because the property straddles the line between Medina and Plymouth. He noted that the applicant is going through the process of rezoning in both cities and will bring a development request back in the future. He stated that this is the last remaining Uptown Hamel parcel on the hill. He stated that the Concept Plan was provided as an informative measure. He stated the Uptown Hamel zoning district is not in tune with larger commercial use and that is why the commercial- highway/railroad district is being requested. He stated that the property is guided for a mixed use business land use in the Comprehensive Plan, as was the Aldi site neighboring this property. He stated that staff believes that this rezoning would still be in tune with the land use identified in the Comprehensive Plan. He provided examples of similar rezoning requests within other zoning districts but the same land use. He stated that staff recommends approval of the request subject to the condition in the staff report. Williams asked the zoning of the property to the east in Plymouth. Finke stated that the property is guided commercial. He stated that staff recommends that the entire building be located within the boundary of Medina to prevent other problems in the future. Murrin asked if the access would still be made available from Highway 55 or whether the back access would be the only access. Finke stated that would be part of the application review at that time and the zoning would have nothing to do with that access. Reid asked if the rezoning would limit the number of stories further than currently allowed. Finke stated that the commercial district would actually allow three stories, which is one less than currently allowed in the Uptown Hamel district. Andy Brandel, ISG, spoke in representation of the applicant and stated that they have been working with both Medina and Plymouth staff in order to coordinate the process and the client can make their decision on whether or not to move forward. Reid opened the public hearing at 9:34 p.m. Jim Taylor spoke in representation of the Arnt property, noting that they support the request. He noted that Just for Kix would be a dance school for children and would be a good fit for the community. He asked that the Commission support the request. Reid closed the public hearing at 9:36 p.m. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Williams stated that this request makes sense and would fit with the zoning of all the other properties in that area. Motion by Albers, seconded by Williams, to recommend approval of a rezoning from UH-2, Uptown Hame1-2 to CH -RR, Commercial-Highway/Railroad for the property at 45 State Highway 55. Motion approved unanimously. (Absent: Nolan) 2 November 6, 2015 Dusty Finke City Planner Planning Department City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 GCCGONIG D N0�' 6 2015 N0 6 2015 RE: Just For Kix Project Description and Rezoning Application Narrative Medina, Minnesota Dusty: Please consider the following project description and narrative during the review process for the attached Rezoning Application. All supplemental information required for the rezoning map amendment review process has also been attached to provide a comprehensive review. The rezoning application and supplemental information are being submitted as part of a request to allow development of an existing residential site to accommodate a new 19,810 square foot Just For Kix Dance Studio, as well as associated parking lot, drive aisles, stormwater facilities, and utilities. The address for the proposed project is 45 State Highway No. 55 in Medina, Minnesota. However, the proposed project site is comprised of two parcels. Once parcel is located in Medina, Minnesota and the other in Plymouth, Minnesota. Parcel Identification Numbers are assigned for each parcel based on their location within the corresponding City. The Medina portion of the site is described as Section 12 T118 R23 (PID 1211823410007) and is comprised of approximately 1.695 acres. The Plymouth portion of the site is described as Section 7 T118 R22 (PID 0711822320003) and is comprised of approximately 0.532 acres. The site is bordered by Elm Creek to the northeast, Trunk Highway No. 55 to the northwest, and a branch of the Canadian Pacific Railroad to the south. The site is served by an existing access and utilities from Sioux Drive which crosses the existing ALDI, Inc. property that borders the west side of the site. The Medina portion of the site is currently zoned as UH-2: Uptown Hamel 2. The parcel is proposed to be zoned as CH -RR: Commercial Highway -Railroad District with Shoreland Overlay, and dance studios are considered a permitted use within this proposed zoning district. To mitigate any potential impacts created by adding impervious surfacing, a stormwater management basin is proposed to manage stormwater runoff created by the development of the Just For Kix site, which will then be treated prior to discharging off site. The stormwater management basin is proposed to be constructed on the south side of the site as illustrated by the attached supplemental information. Other adjacent properties have been granted rezoning to mitigate similar conditions to allow for ordinary operations by similarly situated tenants of like businesses. Approval of this request would provide similar opportunities for the subject parcel. 7900 International Drive, Suite 550 + Minneapolis, MN 55425 info@is-grp.com + www.is-grp.com P: 952.426.0699 I+S GROUP Approval of this project will provide a complementary use and an added amenity to the area within an existing development district. In addition, the proposed project is consistent with pertinent orderly development guidelines, and all applicable local ordinances and regulations affecting redevelopment of this property will be considered and adhered to throughout the design process. This project is an appropriate land use within the district and meets adequate setbacks and parking requirements for the proposed use. These considerations along with the supplemental information provided within this submittal support approval of the attached Rezoning Application. Please contact me at 952.426.0699 if there is any additional information we can provide in support of this request on behalf of Just For Kix. Respectfully Submitted, Andrew T. Brandel, PE Associate Principal, Civil Engineer Civil Engineering Group ATB/rja-jrc Just Fcr KaPro ject Description and Rezoning Application Nar•ative Noverncer 5, 2015 Page 2 of 2 PROJECT NO.00-00000 L (EXISTING SANITARY LINE Architecture Engineering Environmental Planning wwwis-grp.com I+S GROUP Scale: EXISTING ALDI, INC RETAIL FACILITY EXISTING WATER MAIIN JUST FOR KIX MEDINA, MINNESOTA SITE SETBACK DATA: PROPOSED ZONING AREA: CH -RR: COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY -RAILROAD W/SHORELAND OVERLAY BUILDING SETBACK: PARKING SETBACK: FRONT SIDE REAR ELM CREEK EXISTING ELM CREEK 50' BUFFER PROPOSED BUILDING 19,81O SF PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK (PER MEDINA CITY CODE 1 25' 15' 25' 50' y� O SOS-TING SECTION LINE —', 25' 10' 10' 50' 'r.Sl ---\\EOLEOVE ;Ins h� SITE NOTES • SITE EXISTING ZONING DISTRICT ON THE MEDINA SIDE IS UH-2: UPTOWN HAMEL AND ZONE FRD: FUTURE RESTRICTED DEVELOPMENT ON THE PLYMOUTH SIDE. • PROPOSED SITE (BOTH MEDINA & PLYMOUTH LOTS) TO BE RE -ZONED PER REQUIREMENTS OF CH -RR: COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY -RAILROAD W/SHORELAND OVERLAY OF THE CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE SITE AREA CALCULATIONS: PROPOSED SITE: 97,880 S.F. 2.24 ACRES 100% SITE OPEN SPACE: 49,908 S.F. 1.14 ACRES 51% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS PAVED AREA REQUIRED INTERIOR GREEN SPACE: PROPOSED INTERIOR GREEN SPACE: 26,921 S.F. 2,154 S.F. 2,877 S.F. 0.62 ACRES 0.05 ACRES 8% OF PAVED AREA 0.06 ACRES 10.68% *25% MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS AREA ALLOWED PER SHORELAND OVERLAY. IMPERVIOUS AREA UP TO 50% WOULD REQUIRE VARIANCE. PROPOSED PARKING SE rEACK —' {PER MEDIAN CITY Cti-iDEi SITE PARKING DATA: TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 19,810 S.F. PARKING STALLS REQUIRED = 80 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED = 80 1 STALL PER YAGSA. H.C. STALLS REQUIRED = 4 H.C. STALLS PROVIDED = 4 CITY OF PLYMOUTH,' MINNESOTA Agenda Item # 8D NORTHWEST ASSOCIATE© CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 753.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina City Council FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: December 29, 2015 RE: Woodland Hill Preserve Sign Variance CITY FILE: LR-15-171 Application Date: November 9, 2015 Review Deadline: January 8, 2016 BACKGROUND Woodland Hill Preserve, Inc. has made an application for a variance to allow for their monument sign to be placed within the setback. Initially the sign was to be placed on the west side of Woodland Hill Court. The applicant would like to move the sign to the east side and reduce the required setbacks. The proposed location of the sign is on an unaddressed property located to the north of 694 Aster Road. PROPOSED VARIANCE The Woodland Hill Preserve subdivision would like to place a neighborhood identification monument sign on Lot 1, Block 1 within the development. They would like the sign to be placed with a zero setback to both the right-of-way and the outlot to the south. The applicant contends that this is necessary to allow for maximum visibility of the sign. VARIANCE REVIEW The City's sign ordinance in Section 815.09 Subd. 2 (b) states that residential monument signs may be permitted at the entrance of a subdivision provided the sign meets a 10 foot setback. The location of the sign is proposed to be right on both the property line to the right-of-way and the property line to the outlot to the south. The sign is proposed within both the front and side drainage and utility easements. While, it does not appear that moving the sign to the east side of the road causes issues, City Staff does have a general concern about the impacts of the sign in this specific location. The setback to the south property line may be acceptable due to the fact that there is adequate access through this area in the outlot. The front setback, however, will be more impactful, especially since the right-of-way is 50 feet in width. There may be a future need for the drainage and utility easement in this area and the sign position would conflict. Furthermore, the sign is proposed to be placed only one foot from the sidewalk. Staff reviewed the location of the sign and the visibility thereof. There is a tree on the property to the south that does slightly impair the visibility of the sign. However, at the distance the visibility of the sign would be impaired by the tree, the sign would be difficult to see. As you approach the subdivision, there is a slight jog in the road that would allow for driver's to see the sign as you approach the subdivision entrance. Two pictures are attached that were taken from the perspective of about 100 feet from the proposed sign location. The photos were slightly cropped. This is the applicant's proposed location: This is the proposed location while meeting the 10 foot setback: The Zoning Ordinance established criteria for the review of variance. The criteria for granting variances are: (a) A variance shall only be granted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. (b) A variance shall only be granted when it is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (c) A variance may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a practical difficulty. In order for a practical difficult to be established, all of the following criteria shall be met: (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner In determining if the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, the board shall consider, among other factors, whether the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty and whether the variance confers upon the applicant any special privileges that are denied to the owners of other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and (3) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. EASEMENT City Staff would recommend that the applicant acquire an easement for the sign from the property owner. The easement should be reviewed by the City Attorney. STAFF RECOMMENDATION While, it is understandable to allow for a reduction in setback to the outlot, it does not seem to be reasonable to allow for the sign to have a zero setback to the right-of-way, in this instance. While there is a tree in the area, it does not appear that the visibility to the sign will not be greatly impaired at a distance where the sign will be legible. Staff would recommend either denial of the request or allowing the variance to the side yard but not the front. The variance in its entirety does not appear to meet the variance review criteria. Moving it back 10 feet would allow for potential use of the easement and lessen the impact to the sidewalk. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission stated that the request was not consistent with the variance review criteria and recommended denial of the front yard setback variance but stated they would be in favor of the request if it were only for the side yard setback. Potential Council Action If the Council finds that the side (southern) yard setback variance request meets the variance criteria but the front variance does not, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution approving the requested side yard setback variance and denying the variance request because it is not consistent with the variance review criteria. If the Council finds that neither request meets the criteria, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the variance requests. ATTACHMENTS 1. Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Planning Commission minutes 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Photos provided by Applicant 4. Site Plan showing proposed location 5. Rendering of proposed sign Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Woodland Hill Preserve Sign Setback Variance (696 Woodland Hill Court) Sparks presented a variance request for the location of an entrance sign for a subdivision. He stated that in the subdivision plans the entrance sign was located on the west side but the applicant determined that the site would not work for the sign and therefore is requesting to move the sign to the east side, which would require a variance from the ten foot setback from property lines. He stated that one of the setbacks impacted would be an outlot and therefore that would be less impactful to other property owners. He noted that to the east there is a significant tree that would obstruct the view of the sign. He stated that if the sign would have been proposed for the east side when the application was reviewed originally there most likely would not have been any issues. He displayed photographs of the proposed location with stakes that would identify the proposed location. He stated that after reviewing the variance request against the criteria staff did not feel that the zero lot line for the front would be justified. He stated that the variance from the south would not be concerning because of the outlot location. He stated that staff recommends approval of the request for the side yard setback but not the front yard setback. Albers asked if there would be issues if the sign was on the other side of the road. Sparks stated that there would be issues with drainage and utilities on the other side of the road and provided additional details on the proposed location and visibility. Albers asked if there would be landscaping proposed around the sign or whether this would just be the sign. Finke noted that landscaping would be required per the Ordinance. Justin Bannwarth, representing Gonyea Development, the applicant, stated that they initially planned to place the sign on the west side of the road but there were challenges because of grading and retaining walls that will be installed in the future. He stated that when the location on the eastern side was identified their concern was encroachment on the neighboring property owner's lot and a large tree in the view corridor. He stated that any help they could receive to increase the visibility would be appreciated. He stated that typically there would be up lighting cast onto the sign and landscaping would be provided. Murrin asked the number of lots in the development. Bannwarth replied 15 lots total. Williams asked if this location would exist within the drainage and utility easement. Finke stated that a portion of the easement would be utilized. Bannwarth stated that they would be willing to enter into an encroachment agreement if desired, stating that the City would not have liability to landscaping or those type of elements. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 12/8/2015 Meeting Minutes Reid asked if there were any public comments. Grant Bender stated that he lives in the Toll development and there is a challenge for this development to have their own identification. He stated that he supports the request. Reid stated that one criteria for the variance is that the plight of the landowner is unique and not created by the landowner. She did not feel that this is unique and felt that bringing the sign closer to the outlot would be fine. She stated that she would recommend denial of the portion going into the easement. Williams agreed that this would not rise to the level of justification to interfere with the easement. Foote agreed with the comments made by Williams. White agreed that this would not meet the standards of the variance request. Reid stated that she would be fine that the sign be moved closer to the Outlot. Motion by White, seconded by Reid, to recommend denial of the Woodland Hill Preserve sign front yard setback variance and recommend approval of the side yard setback variance. Motion approved unanimously. (Absent: Nolan) 2 Woodland Hill Preserve Monument Sign Variance Request As the Applicant, on behalf of the Fee Title Property Owner, Woodland Hill Preserve, Inc. ("Developer") formally requests a variance to reduce required setbacks, imposed upon our neighborhood monument sign from 10' to 0', from the adjacent property lines. Initially, the Developer intended to place the sign on the west side of Woodland Hill Court (Lot 14, Block 1); however, it is now apparent this is not viable due to the existing grade and vegetation (see exhibit 1). In order to place the monument on said lot, as indicated in the development plans, significant tree removal and grading, which will encroach into the neighbor's yard, is required. In addition, Xcel Energy has also placed facilities (pedestal) near the intended sign location further complicating the ability to use the space for signage. As a viable alternative Developer is seeking to move the neighborhood monument sign to the east side of Woodland Hill Court (Lot 1, Block 1) as shown in the attached site plan. This location is the more logical choice given the curvature of Woodland Hill Court, as one enters the property. Lot 1, Block 1 is the immediate focal point for drivers. That said, if the Developer places the sign back 10' from the front and side property lines, as required by City Ordinance, view of the sign is obstructed by a large oak tree on the adjacent Toll Brothers development (see exhibit 2). By reducing the setback requirement the sign visibility concerns are eliminated (see exhibit 3). In addition to increasing visibility, the proposed reduced setbacks also minimize the sign's encroachment into the front yard of Lot 1, Block 1, lessening the impact on the builder and eventual homeowner. Immediately adjacent to the proposed monument sign location, the City has been deeded an outlot (Outlot A), which encompasses one of the site's storm water facilities. There was some initial concern expressed by City Staff that the sign would encroach into the drainage and utility easement of Lot 1, Block 1, with the reduced setbacks, thereby limiting access. After further discussion the drainage and utility easement, on the south side of Lot 1, Block 1, becomes less a necessity given the City has ample access to the pond via Outlot A, which is just over 20' wide at its narrowest point. The 20' wide opening more than adequately accommodate maintenance access, as well as drainage. It is our opinion that by changing the location of the proposed monument sign the integrity of the neighborhood will remain unchanged and the sign compliments and works in harmony with the residential use. We appreciate consideration of this request and look forward to installing a sign that will enhance the site and provide a sense of identity for the area. EXHIBIT 1 I Original Sign Location (behind slope and tree EXHIBIT 2 Approximate Sign Location with 10' setback from the front yard property line EXHIBIT 3 Approximate Sign Location with 0' setback from the front yard property line 10 i1a81411N 1i1a1 As VRO0-41.0Z 4LOZ'S L'L p 303I011a :LINO 38Z I Nr0 211Z/NA na 31334331113 .as N.n1310 z w:3013,N NW/N.003N i i_ I, 11 NOIS orAzioL o w11NOW 5402.01301 N 3:,530�3"3.e �dsw0i%o of 3a3"°3.;�a �ds1 ON sw3 a ;',1a 13006001 3 � 4004 0 03 o33Ev/N0yei,. 1133 ,I No>rNin:3e0 u 3,61 n 11131HX3 30VNOIS 1N3WnNOW NW'VNI03W NOLIND. 3AHASBHd 111H ONVIOOOM anfo. ltlld 1VNI3 `IOSSS w'a"�uTe..P.1 .a MO N. ImaIW MAA 9330-004. ONINNVid 1V1N3WNOLIAN3 ONIA3ANIIS ONM33NION3 133i NI =NOS R 04 N (E.$).0alloislN3wnNow Eli F ON3931 „an SRL - 9NI3421dd ON., 133N1S d0 30IS SIH1 NO 3OVNOIS 133N1S s SS303'd 3ONVN31NItlW 3131H3/1 1N3W3St/3 M3N ONOd 1N31A13SV3 fl'Sa NI SI V iOlino 31111N3 3OVNOIS N3dd(18 ON`d113M 11VM ONINIV13N 213M3S W2lO1S 1 3NI1101 i NOV1313S lN '8WO • WHYM3OIS 01 100d 3NO NOVS13S 02132 NOIS 1N3Wf1NOW moves 3S 3NI1101 l 101 11VM ONINIV13N .. t,' 7- --, . 11°Ttr/ 'f''''....`••••••."'`'''.. \ . % 4 -O./ „ fr ,Z. 9t1)14` `PI (3.1--- 11- •• GI 0 I -1 117 0-9 A dt, is(1' tf\ .15;1 0 4 arl / _ r\ \‘ ,f,(ie.1301-1 plipippg 67/51,41 tiol,/ON/ Agenda Item # 8E Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2016- ESTABLISHING 2016 APPOINTMENTS AND DESIGNATIONS TO VARIOUS CITY SERVICES, AUTHORITIES, COMMISSIONS, AND AGENCIES WHEREAS, the City contracts with various consultants and businesses to provide services to the City, and WHEREAS, the City is required to appoint City representatives to City commissions as well as area jurisdictions, agencies, authorities and commissions as indicated by governing documents, State statute, or City codes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Medina hereby establishes the 2016 appointments and designations listed on Exhibit A. Dated: January 5, 2016. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016- January 5, 2016 Exhibit A Council Office/Liaisons 2016 Appointment(s) Acting Mayor Jeff Pederson Public Safety Liaison Jeff Pederson Public Works Liaison Kathleen Martin Planning & Zoning Liaison John Anderson Parks Liaison Lorie Cousineau Administration Liaison Bob Mitchell City Consultants Auditing Services Abdo Eick and Meyers LLP Building Inspector Metro West Inspection City Assessor Southwest Assessing (Rolf Erickson) City Attorney Kennedy & Graven (Ron Batty) City Engineer WSB (Tom Kellogg) Financial Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Fire Marshal Loren Kohnen Metro West Inspection (alternate) IT Cipher Laboratories (Mike Brocco) Planning Consultant Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Prosecuting Attorney Tallen & Baertschi (Steve Tallen) City Staff City Clerk Jodi Gallup City Treasurer Erin Barnhart Human Resource Officers Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup (alternate) Data Compliance Officials Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup (alternate) Ed Belland - Police Cec Vieau - Police Erin Barnhart - Finance Dusty Finke - Planning Steve Scherer - Public Works Responsible Authority for MN Government Data Practices Act Scott Johnson Jodi Gallup Zoning Administrator Dusty Finke Deb Peterson (alternate) City Committee, Agency, CommissionIispresentatives Communities in Collaboration Council Ed Belland Elm Creek Watershed (2nd Wednesday @ 11:30 a.m., Maple Grove City Hall) Elizabeth Weir Madeleine Linck (alternate) Hamel VFD Relief Association (2nd Monday @ 8:00 p.m.) (need 2 elected officials as ex-officio members) Jeff Pederson Kathleen Martin (1st alternate) Resolution No. 2016- January 5, 2016 1 Exhibit A Highway 55 Corridor Coalition Joint Powers Jeff Pederson Scott Johnson (1st alternate) Lake Independence TMDL through Pioneer -Sarah Creek Watershed Hakanson Anderson Scott Johnson (alternate) Lake Sarah TMDL through Pioneer -Sarah Creek Watershed Hakanson Anderson Scott Johnson (alternate) Elm Creek TMDL through Elm Creek Watershed Hakanson Anderson Elizabeth Weir (alternate) Minnehaha Creek Watershed Elizabeth Weir Northwest Hennepin League of Municipalities (2nd Wednesday @ 6:30 p.m.) Bob Mitchell Kathleen Martin (alternate) I-94 Chamber of Commerce Jodi Gallup (alternate) Scott Johnson (alternate) Pioneer -Sarah Creek Watershed (third Thursday @ 4:00 p.m., Independence City Hall) Mike McLaughlin Pat Wulff (1st alternate) Scott Johnson (2nd alternate) Elizabeth Weir (3rd alternate) Uptown Hamel Inc. (Business Assn.) (third Tuesday @ Noon, location changes) Jeff Pederson Scott Johnson (alternate) Weed and Tree Inspector Steve Scherer Cable Franchise Liaison Judy Mallett Designation of Official Depositories & Investment of Idle Funds Farmers State Bank of Hamel 21 st Century Bank of Loretto Citigroup/Smith Barney MBIA Voyageur Asset Management Inc./(4M) Fund RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. Designation of Official Citv Legal Newspaper Crow River News Planning Commission Appointments Three Year Term Three Year Term Park Commission Appointments Three Year Term Steve Lee Three Year Term Resolution No. 2016- January 5, 2016 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: December 30, 2015 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates January 5, 2016 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Bradford Creek Plat and ROW Vacation — 2872 Ardmore Ave. — Susan Prodahl, Carl Henderson, and Paul Henderson have requested plat approval in order to re -plat eight substandard lots in Independence Beach into two buildable lots. The applicants have also requested that the City vacate a portion of right-of-way to the north of the subject site in which there is currently no roadway improvements. Staff is conducting a preliminary review to determine if the application is complete for review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled to be presented to the Council on January 5. B) Kal Point Site Plan Reivew, PUD Amendment — 340 Clydesdale Trail — Kalyan Vempaty has requested an amendment to the Medina Clydesdale Marketplace PUD and a Site Plan Review to construct a commercial building containing a restaurant and upstairs office space on the final lot within Clydesdale Marketplace. Staff is conducting a preliminary review to determine if the application is complete for review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled to be presented to the Council on January 5. C) 45 Highway SS Rezoning — Steve Clough has requested that the City rezone property to the east of Aldi from Uptown Hame1-2 to Commercial Highway -Railroad. This zoning is the same as the Aldi site and the property to the west of Sioux Drive in the vicinity. The rezoning is in anticipation of commercial development of the site. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended approval. The request is scheduled to be presented to the Council on January 5. D) Woodland Hill Preserve sign variance — 696 Woodland Hill Court — Woodland Hill Preserve Inc. has requested a variance from the setback requirements for signs for the neighborhood monument sign of Woodland Hill Preserve. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the December 8 meeting and recommended denial of the variance from the front yard setback. The Commission stated that they were not as concerned about the side yard setback variance. The request is scheduled to be presented to the Council on January 5. E) Hamel Brewery Site Plan Review and CUP — 22 Hamel Road — 22 Hamel Road LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of a brew pub with food service. The applicant has also requested A CUP for an outdoor seating area. Staff is conducting a preliminary review and will schedule for a hearing when complete, potentially at the January 12 Planning Commission meeting. F) Vickerman Right-of-way Vacation — 2982 Lakeshore Ave. — Michael Vickerman has requested that the City vacate the southern half of the adjacent right-of-way in which there are currently no street improvements. Staff has scheduled a public hearing for the January 19 City Council meeting. G) Wealshire LLC Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Site Plan Review — Wealshire, LLC has requested a site plan review for construction of a 173,000 sf memory care facility. The request also includes a rezoning from RR-UR to Business Park and an Interim Use Permit to permit continued agricultural use of the portion of the property not proposed to be developed. The Met Council has also approved of the previous Comp Plan amendment. The Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning, site plan review and interim use perniit at the February 10 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The City Council reviewed at the May 19 meeting and directed staff to Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 January 5, 2015 City Council Meeting prepare approval documents. The applicant has subsequently changed their proposed site plan which was presented to the Planning Commission and Council. The applicant is working on finalizing construction plans. H) Medina Mini -Storage Site Plan Review; Text Amendment — 4790 Rolling Hills Road — Highway 55 Rental Portable Storage, LLC has requested a site plan review to construct three additional mini - storage buildings. The applicant has also requested an amendment to the City's zoning code to allow fiber -cement ("Hardiboard") exterior building materials in the Rural Business and Rural Commercial Holding districts. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the October 13 meeting. The Commission supported fiber cement materials (lap siding only) in the RBH and RCH districts and recommended approval of the site plan review. The City Council adopted the ordinance on November 4 and adopted a resolution of approval on the site plan on November 17. Staff will work with applicant on the conditions of approval before construction begins. I) St. Peter and Paul Cemetery and Hamel Place —The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. J) Stonegate Conservation Design Subdivision, Woods of Medina, Capital Knoll— these preliminary plats have been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application K) Hamel Haven, Buehler subdivisions — These subdivisions have received final approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before construction begins. L) Wright -Hennepin Solar Panels — WH has requested a conditional use permit for the installation of a solar garden approximately an acre in area at their substation on Willow Drive, south of Highway 55. The Council adopted a resolution of approval at the June 16 meeting. Staff will work with the applicant to meet the conditions of approval before construction. Other Proiects A) Comprehensive Plan —staff put together information related to the vision and goals for review by the Steering Committee and also has begun putting together conceptual land use maps for discussion. B) City Hall Renovation — staff met with potential owner's representatives to provide assistance on the renovation project. The owner's rep is helping solicit architect proposals. C) Internet Analysis — staff met with a vendor who may potentially be interested in offering wireless internet services to homes in Medina. Staff requested additional details and will report to the Council if potential exists. D) Engineering Standards — staff reviewed proposed amendments to the City's engineering standards. WSB will incorporate comments for final presentation. E) Loram Administrative Site Plan Review — staff received an application for Loram to expand their existing parking lot. This request may be reviewed administratively as a result of amendments made to City Code earlier in the year. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 January 5, 2015 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p: 763.473-9209 f: 763.473-8858 non -emergency: 763-525-6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency 9.1_1 TO: City Administrator Scott Johnson and City Council FROM: Director Edgar J. Belland DATE: December 30, 2015 RE: Department Updates Holiday Train On December 12th we had the Canadian Pacific Railroad Holiday Train in Loretto. The event was well attended. The crowd was estimated at between four to five thousand people. The event was coordinated by Officer Gregory, Officer Boecker and Reserve Sergeant Chorley. We had over twenty volunteers working the event. We had a suspicious Arabic post on the Loretto Holiday Train Facebook page three days before the event. We have a security plan for the event. The post was forwarded to the FBI to be analyzed. The FBI confirmed that the post was not a threat. The event went off without incident. Arrest made in Heroin Death Case On December 12, 2015, James Edward McClellan of Brooklyn Park was charged in the death of Alexander Hanson Milun with 3rd degree murder. Milun died on October 24, 2015, in Medina of a Heroin overdose. Our agent with the West Metro Drug Taskforce investigated the case and joined up with the Hennepin Anoka Drug Taskforce to track down McClellan who had sold the drugs to Milun. The investigation took a month and a half of intensive work by both taskforces to bring McClellan in. He is facing 1st degree sales charge in both Hennepin and Anoka Counties. It is good that we took him off the streets, but we still lost a life to the Heroin epidemic. New Railroad Crude Oil Safe Standards signed into Law Below is a news bulletin posted in reference to the new law. A transportation law signed by President Obama earlier this month includes new mandates for freight trains transporting crude oil through the United States. The law requires that tank cars used for transporting crude oil be replaced by March 1, 2018, phasing out older DOT 111 tank cars for shipment of flammable liquids, including most Bakken crude oil, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. The new tank cars will have thicker steel shells, insulating materials, full-size metal shields at each end and improved outlet valves underneath the car. The DOT said that the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) also outlines a classification and testing program for mined gases and liquids and new operational requirements for high -hazard flammable trains (HHFT) that include braking controls and speed restrictions. A rail disaster in Lac-Megantic, Canada, on July 26, 2013, that killed 42 people brought a heightened focus on the dangers of transporting highly flammable Bakken crude oil by train. The Journal News reports that the new law requires freight railroads to provide real-time data on flammable liquids shipments to state emergency response commissions (SERCs) to be shared with local first responders. The law codifies what had been a regulatory emergency order requiring trains containing one million gallons of Bakken crude oil to notify SERCs or other appropriate state -delegated entities about the operation of these trains through their states. For the first time, the rail safety section of the new transportation law also allows states and localities to obtain inspection reports on privately owned rail bridges filed with the Federal Railroad Administration by freight railroads. Localities will be eligible for 80% federal funding to finance safety improvements at dangerous railroad crossings. According to the DOT, the rule: Requires an enhanced tank car standard and an aggressive, riskbased retrofitting schedule for older tank cars carrying crude oil and ethanol. Requires a new braking standard for certain trains that will offer a higher level of safety by potentially reducing the severity of an accident. Designates new operational protocols for trains transporting large volumes of flammable liquids, such as routing requirements, speed restrictions, and information for local government agencies. Provides new sanpling and testing requirements to improve classification of energy products placed into transport. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson Patrol Activities For the dates of December 11 to December 27, 2015, our officers issued 44 citations and 116 warnings for various traffic infractions. There was a total of one driving while impaired arrest, eight traffic accidents, four medicals and eight alarms. Criminal Investigations by Investigator Charmane Domino Customer obtained services from a local business and did not pay for the service. The total outstanding bill is around $5000. Received a report from MN Adult Abuse Reporting Center about possible assault of a vulnerable adult. The subject was deemed not a vulnerable adult by statute and officers had responded to a domestic at the residence on the date of the assault. Resident listed on the Predatory Offender Registry came to the police department to update his registration. Local business was the victim of a quick change scam and lost about $160. Open cases currently under investigation: 11 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: December 30, 2015 MEETING: January 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • We have had a few snow events in the past two weeks. The new trucks have worked out well and I anticipate many years of service from them. • Linda and I will begin gathering quotes and move forward with the administrative portions of the 2016 pavement management plan. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • Finally things have frozen up and our erosion control inspections can stop until a thaw happens. • Linda has wrapped up the final report for the Ardmore Stormwater Retrofit Grant Project. The sign has been ordered and will be installed when it is completed. • I will be working with WSB on the well house project and getting plans ready for your approval by the end of January. PARKS/TRAILS • The trails have been cleared of snow and are in full use. • The skating rink and the sliding hill are always a big hit over Christmas vacation. Originally, I didn't feel we could get ice in time, but we did manage to get at least a large portion of the Legion Park rink frozen for the break. • I have spoken to the property owner adjacent to Tomann Park about possibly purchasing a small portion of his property bordering the northeast corner of the park. The information is in the packet for discussion on January 5th. • We are working on a design for the trail along Arrowhead Drive and will have a preliminary plan to the Park Commission and the City Council in the next month. ORDER CHECKS December 16, 2015 - January 6, 2016 43760 BERGERON HOMES $10,000.00 43761 CENTERPOINT ENERGY $299.77 43762 CENTURYLINK $644.00 43763 ETZEL, BRIAN/PATRICIA $1,000.00 43764 HOLIDAY FLEET $468.29 43765 KRENN,JENNIFER $250.00 43766 PANYAM,JAYANTH $500.00 43767 ASPLUND, KRISTINE $150.00 43768 EHLERS & ASSOC INC. $1,682.50 43769 JALIL, AFZAAL $250.00 43770 KARINIEMI, MARK $250.00 43771 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR $329.00 43772 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE $629.15 43773 MORSE, CHARLES $152.00 43774 NOVAK, GARY $244.25 43775 PONNEESWARAN, SASIKALA $250.00 43776 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL $537.90 43777 TUPAKULA,PRAVEEN $150.00 43778 ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM $50.00 43779 ALLSTAR ELECTRIC $294.80 43780 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. $93.68 43781 ASPEN MILLS INC $144.95 43782 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS $375.00 43783 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL $1,280.57 43784 BIFFS INC $247.30 43785 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $1,245.47 43786 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS $771.34 43787 BUDGET PRINTING $138.89 43788 BURDAS TOWING $150.00 43789 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION INC $16,900.00 43790 CITY OF CORCORAN $7,774.47 43791 DITTER INC $3,887.64 43792 ECM PUBLISHERS INC $252.68 43793 ENGEL WATER TESTING INC $360.00 43794 FASTENAL COMPANY $134.71 43795 HENN COUNTY ELECTIONS $222.16 43796 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH $851.32 43797 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC $203.43 43798 HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL $143.75 43799 HOLIDAY FLEET $1,002.75 43800 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY $189.00 43801 KELLY'S WRECKER SERVICE INC $127.00 43802 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED $12,702.75 43803 LANO EQUIPMENT INC $23.90 43804 LARKIN AUTO $368.05 43805 MEDTOX LABS $49.03 43806 METRO WEST INSPECTION $12,833.07 43807 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION $147.00 43808 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT INC $269.95 43809 MN BUREAU OF CRIMINAL $75.00 43810 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $201.40 43811 NORTH MEMORIAL $50.00 43812 OFFICE DEPOT $133.53 43813 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR $56.50 43814 RANDY'S SANITATION INC $795.12 43815 STREICHER'S $589.85 43816 SUPERIOR BROOKDALE FORD $35.76 43817 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $521.25 43818 TITAN MACHINERY $177.54 43819 TRI-COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT $75.00 43820 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $36.18 43821 WSB & ASSOCIATES $47,431.75 43822 ZIEGLER INC $342.77 43823 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN $500.00 43824 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN $315.00 43825 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS $3,550.00 43826 CENTURYLINK $644.00 43827 DELANO SPORTSMANS CLUB $500.00 43828 HENN CTY CHIEFS POLICE ASSN $125.00 43829 HENN COUNTY ELECTIONS $1,068.80 43830 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $22,637.15 43831 MN DVS $192.00 43832 MN RURAL WATER ASSOC $275.00 43833 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES INC $7,418.69 43834 TEGRETE CORP $1,358.64 43835 WRIGHT COUNTY $250.00 Total Checks $170,377.45 Electronic Payments December 16, 2015 — January 6, 2016 003455E PR PERA $14,341.23 003456E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $15,243.52 003457E PR MN Deferred Comp $3,660.00 003458E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,096.99 003459E SELECT ACCOUNT ($114.66) 003460E CITY OF MEDINA $19.00 003461E MINNESOTA, STATE OF $2,520.00 003462E SELECT ACCOUNT $4,094.89 003463E ELAN FINANCIAL $1,849.43 003464E EXXONMOBIL $1,162.69 003465E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $219.90 003466E PR PERA $14,229.64 003467E KONICA MINOLTA $168.48 003468E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $355.80 003469E XCEL ENERGY $8,760.58 003470E WRIGHT HENN COOP ELEC ASSN $1,754.85 003471E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES $83.98 003472E CITY OF PLYMOUTH $805.93 003473E PR FED/FICA $15,657.98 003474E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,260.00 003475E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,203.85 003476E SELECT ACCOUNT $752.00 003477E CITY OF MEDINA $19.00 003478E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $20.00 003479E MARCO (LEASE) $976.86 003480E DELTA DENTAL $2,604.60 Total Electronic Checks $97,746.54 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT December 16 & December 30, 2015 506848 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. $1,269.15 506849 BARNHART, ERIN A. $1,865.68 506850 BELLAND, EDGAR J. $2,484.22 506851 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,478.62 506852 CONVERSE, KEITH A. $2,435.71 506853 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,943.68 506854 DOMINO, CHARMANE $1,730.48 506855 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,390.59 506856 FINKE, DUSTIN D $917.90 506857 GALLUP, JODI M $1,590.31 506858 GLEASON, JOHN M. $1,721.21 506859 GREGORY, THOMAS $2,206.79 506860 HALL, DAVID M. $2,397.58 506861 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S $2,687.77 506862 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,162.88 506863 KLAERS, ANNE M. $1,094.26 506864 LANE, LINDA $1,465.16 506865 LEUER, GREGORY J. $2,106.47 506866 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,665.41 506867 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,373.93 506868 NELSON, JASON $2,424.32 506869 PALMER, CLARK A $527.71 506870 PETERSON, DEBRA A $1,563.73 506871 REINKING, DEREK M $1,481.43 506872 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,225.71 506873 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,165.45 506874 WENANDE, BRANDON S $531.94 506875 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. $1,269.15 506876 BARNHART, ERIN A. $1,868.18 506877 BELLAND, EDGAR J. $2,530.20 506878 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,495.00 506879 CONVERSE, KEITH A. $2,076.34 506880 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,661.76 506881 DOMINO, CHARMANE $1,771.09 506882 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,367.22 506883 FINKE, DUSTIN D $2,039.62 506884 GALLUP, JODI M $1,602.04 506885 GLEASON, JOHN M. $2,280.15 506886 GREGORY, THOMAS $2,031.62 506887 HALL, DAVID M. $2,150.23 506888 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S $2,342.12 506889 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,213.98 506890 KLAERS, ANNE M. $1,122.00 506891 LANE, LINDA $1,509.27 506892 LEUER, GREGORY J. $2,099.38 506893 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,438.15 506894 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,373.93 506895 NELSON, JASON $2,224.84 506896 PALMER, CLARK A $622.10 506897 PETERSON, DEBRAA $1,594.39 506898 REINKING, DEREK M $2,056.79 506899 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,402.32 506900 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,188.62 506901 WENANDE, BRANDON S $493.77 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $94,732.35 PAYROLL CHECKS December 30, 2015 020434 PALMER, CLARK $97.14 Total Payroll Checks $97.14