HomeMy Public PortalAboutCCMINS 03-26-1984March 26, 1984
CLOSED SESSION OF MARCH 26, 1984
Prior to the regular meeting of March 26, 1984, a closed session
was held at 6:30 p.m., Municipal Court Building, 39 South
Livermore Avenue, to discuss litigation matters.
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 26, 1984
A regular meeting of the City Council was held on Monday,
March 26, 1984, in the Municipal Court Building, 39 South
Livermore Avenue. The meeting was called to order at 8:07 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers:
Present:
Absent:
Brown, Stein, Kamena, Wieskamp, Mayor Turner
None
Staff Members Present:
City Manager Lee Horner, City Attorney Tom Curry, City Clerk
Carol Greany, Assistant City Manager Jerry Peeler, Director
of Public Works Dan Lee, Planning Director Bob Brown,
aHd Fire Chief Mike Sample.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Turner led the council~nembers and audience in the pledge of
allegiance.
MINUTES APPROVAL
ON THE MOTION OF CM BROWN, SECONEED'BY VM WIESKAMP, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1984,
WERE APPROVED.
PROCLAMATIONS
A proclamation was presented to Sallie Gray, Library Director,
proclaiming the week of April 8-14 as National Library Week.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Patricia Gray, Crane Ridge Road, representing CAPP, clarified
CAPP'S position on local issues.
Denise Unger, Granada High Student, asked Council if they intend
to pass an ordinance regarding cruising in Livermore. She stated
that there is nothing for the teenagers to do in Livermore and
that a dance hall is needed instead of an indoor soccer arena.
CM-39-100
March 26, 1984
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(continued)
Kattie Richardson, 510 Junction, submitted another petition to
Council making a total or 7,110 Signatures collected against VMH's
move to Pleasanton.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PREZONING AND
ANNEXATION - VASCO/
PRESTON AVE. ASSESS.
DISTRICT
This hearing was continued from the meeting of February 27, 1984, to
consider prezoning to I-2 (Light Industrial) and annexation of 75+
acres located east of Vasco Road, north of Preston, being a portion
of the Vasco Road/Preston Avenue Assessment District. The hearing
was continued to allow staff time to respond to comments to the
Negative Declaration by Caltrans.
The staff and Planning Commission recommended that the Negative
Declaration be certified, approve prezoning to I-2 (Light
Industrial), and approve initiation of annexation proceedings.
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing; and there being no further
comment, the public hearing was closed.
ON THE MOTION OF CM BROWN, SECONDED BY CM KAMENA, AND BY A 5-0 VOTE,
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WAS ADOPTED.
APPEAL-CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT - SOUR
DOG WAGON
A hearing was held to consider an appeal of a Planning Commission
decision approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow San Francisco
Sour Dog retail sales wagon to operate at the Mobil Service Station,
114 So. Vasco Road. Negative Declaration consideration.
This item was appealed by Mayor Turner because of his concern
regarding the hazard of signs and having no control over this type of
mobile use. He asked Council to work on an ordinance concerning this
type of mobile use so a precedent will not be set.
Bob Brown expressed two concerns: existing nonconformity and
allowing temporary uses. He stated that the City should establish
standards to be used regarding mobile businesses because enforcement
of them is very difficult.
CM-39-101
March 26, 1984
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(continued)
APPEAL - CUP
Mayor Turner opened the public hearings.
Lucy Bettenhausen, owner of Sour Dogs, stated that she does not
know what the appeal is about and that she needs time to get a
defense ready. She is willing to work with the City and she has
taken down the sign. She also stated that she has received good
reports on the business and people who only have half hour
lunches come to the wagon regularly.
Chris Evert, an employee of Sour Dogs, stated that people do park
in the back and that it does not seem to be a problem.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Turner stated that the city needs a regulating ordinance
because if a precedent is set, it could turn into a problem.
CM Stein stated that he is concerned about two things: the City
has little control in the county and we do need an ordinance.
CM Brown stated that she does not see Sa problem and the business
is filling a need and that the C.U.P. can control the signage.
She will support the recommendation.
VM Wieskamp agreed that the business is filling a need and that
the City needs an ordinance so that businesses know exactly what
they can do.
CM Kamena stated that an ordinance is not needed and that they
are doing nothing Wrong.
A MOTION TO DENY THE APPEAL BY CM KAMENA, SECONDED BY CM STEIN,
PASSED BY A 5-0 VOTE.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
5236 - ADAMS AND GRAVES
A hearing was held to consider an application by Adams and Graves
for approval of Tentative Tract Map 5236 and Planned Unit
Development Permit to allow a residential condominium subdivision
of 11.6 acres located east of Dolores Street, north of Pacific
Avenue. Environmental Impact Report consideration.
CM-39-102
March 26, 1984
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(continued)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
5236 - ADAMS AND
GRAVES (continued)
This development is proposed as an exempt project under the RDP. The
project will be subsidized by State tax-exempt bonds and the
applicant will maintain 25% of the units for low income families for
10 years in return for the tax-exempt status. The City Council has
adopted a resolution to support the issuance of the bonds. The
Council action also accepts this project as "government subsidized
housing", which qualifies it for RDP exemption. In approximately 18
months, the applicant proposes rental ranges from $545 to $650 per
month and at the end of 10 years the units can be sold.
The Planning Commission and staff recommend certifying the EIR,
directing appropriate filing, and approving Planned Unit Development
Permit 216-83 and Tentative Tract Map 5236, based on the findings and
subject to the conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No.
110-84.
Mayor Turner opened the public hearing.
Darrell Graves, representing Adams and Graves, explained the regular
market rate rents and affordable rents ranging from $502-$620 a month
which is $30-$40 less a month than the market rates. They are
willing to subsidize the project and bring the rents down on 28 of
the 41 units to Section 8 levels; however, there is no Section 8
funding for the project so they are willing to work with Alameda
County and BRIDGE to accomplish the write down. Mr. Graves also
explained that they prefer only one tot lot instead of two.
Candace Aderman, director of Echo Housing, stated that she has had
the opportunity to work with various projects and that both Diablo
Vista and Meadow Brook serve the needs of low-moderate income. She
supports the project.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
A discussion followed regarding the determination of low-moderate
income.
CM-39-103
March 26, 1984
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(continued)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
5236 - ADAMS AND
GRAVES (continued)
CM Brown requested that Ms. Aderman, Dick Adams, and Darrell
Graves return to the podium to answer questions. It was
confirmed that the quoted rents do include the costs of utilities
and that a two bedroom apartment would accommodate up to four
people. Dick Adams explained the arrangement they are seeking
with BRIDGE and Alameda County whereby each entity would
contribute approximately $7,500 to write down rents to Section 8
levels. Ms. Aderman stated that the moderate income clientele
could qualify to purchase this housing; however, low-income would
not.
CM Stein proposed that the sale be staggered to minimize the
impact on the people as well as the market considering the number
of projects which have been approved to be converted at that
time. He suggested that a minimum of 180 days notice or 2 months
for every year of occupancy, whichever is greater, would stretch
the conversion to a maximum of 20 months.
MAYOR TURNER MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROJECT AS RECOMMENDED BY
STAFF, SECONDED BY VM WIESKAMP.
CM STEIN MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ALLOW 180 DAYS NOTICE OF
SALE OR 2 MONTHS FOR EVERY YEAR OF OCCUPANCY, WHICHEVER IS
GREATER FOR A MAXIMUM OF 20 MONTHS NOTICE, SECONDED BY CM KAMENA,
AND PASSED BY A 4-1 VOTE (MAYOR TURNER IN MINORITY).
Mayor Turner stated that the original lease and a separate
document sets out the understanding that these units will be sold
at the end of 10 years rental time and that he does not believe
the extended notice time is necessary.
CM BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY CM KAMENA, TO REQUIRE THAT 25% (41
UNITS) BE MAINTAINED AT SECTION 8 LEVELS.
THE MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN FOLLOWING A DISCUSSION REGARDING THE
RULES OF APPROVAL.
Dick Adams explained that it would cost $50,000 per year to
subsidize 41 units and that such a subsidy would push the project
too far and that it could not be built.
CM-39-104
March 26, 1984
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(continued)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
5236 - ADAMS AND
GRAVES (continued)
CM BROWN MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MODIFY CONDITIONS 15 AND 17 AS
FOLLOWS:
Condition No. 15 The Developer shall enter into a contract with the
City to ensure that at least 41 units shall be availaDle exclusively
to low income occupants. The contract shall provide that rents will
not exceed the following rates:
1. 16 units shall not exceed rent levels of 110% of the U.S.
HCD defined rents for new construction Section 8 subsidized
housing. ~~~~~3~
2. The remaining 25 units shall not exceed/80% of the ~most
recent accepted Bay Area Median adjusted income.
Condition No. 17 - At least 25%...units at rates not to exceed those
identified in Condition No. 15. These units shall remain available
at these rates for a minimum of 10 years.
MOTION SECONDED BY CM KAMENA AND PASSED BY A 3-2 VOTE (VM WIESKAMP
AND MAYOR TURNER IN MINORITY).
THE MAIN MOTION PASSED BY A 5-0 VOTE.
RECESS
Mayor Turner declared a brief recess and reconvened with CM Kamena
temporarily absent.
REZONE ORDINANCE MAP
MILT CODIROLI
This hearing was continued to the meeting of April 9 as requested by
the applicant.
ON THE MOTION OF MAYOR TURNER, SECONDED BY CM BRO~, AND BY A 4-0-1
VOTE (CM KAMENA TEMPORARILY ABSENT), THE HEARING WAS CONTINUED TO
APRIL 9.
CM Kamena reseated.
CM-39-105
March 26, 1984
CONSENT CALENDAR
CM BROWN MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESENTED,
SECONDED BY VM WIESKAMP, AND PASSED BY A 5-0 VOTE.
CM stein noted that the resolution under 2.2 approving K-Mart
Tentative Parcel Map 4215 should include the condition that
architectural design be uniform throughout the development.
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT - U-HAUL
RESOLUTION NO. 47-84
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
VARIANCE FOR A FREESTANDING SIGN
(U-HAUL)
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
4215 - K-MART
RESOLUTION NO. 48-84
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
(PARCEL MAP 4215)
PUD PERMIT 21-84
SPRINGTOWN CONVENIENCE
STORE
RESOLUTION NO. 49-84
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
(PUD 21-84)
LIVERMORE-ALTAMONT
TRACK CONSOLIDATION
CALTRANS
RESOLUTION NO. 50-84
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING FOR ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR THE
LIVERMORE-ALTAMONT TRACK CONSOLIDATION PROJECT
CM-39-106
March 26, 1984
CONSENT CALENDAR
(continued)
AMENDMENT SEWER
CONNECTION -
CARBELLO/SALO
RESOLUTION NO. 51-84
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT
TO SEWER CONNECTION AGREEMENT
(CARBELLO/SALO)
RECORDS RETENTION
SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 52-84
A RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 293-79 AND
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEW RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
WEED ABATEMENT 1984
RESOLUTION NO. 53-84
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT THERE EXIST CONDITIONS OF GROWING
WEEDS, ACCUMULATED REFUSE, RUBBISH OR DIRT ON PRIVATE
SIDEWALKS, AS DESCRIBED IN THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING THE
SAME TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE
MEMORANDUM OF
AGREEMENT/ASSIGNMENT
DOCUMENT - RESEARCH
DRIVE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 54-84
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MEMORANDUM
OF AGREEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF DOCUMENT
BOY SCOUT TROOP 906
Livermore Boy Scout Troop 906 was granted an encroachment permit to
paint house numbers on curbs as a fund raiser, and was granted a
waiver of the encroachment permit fee and business license tax.
CM-39-107
March 26, 1984
CONSENT CALENDAR
(continued)
ANDEN GROUP
TRACT 5070
RESOLUTION NO. 55-84
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO INITIATE CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS:
FIXING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION
OF NECESSITY; DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF HEARING BE
GIVEN (TRACT 5070 - ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF ENTRY
TO CLEAR, WIDEN AND CONFORM NAVIGABLE STREAM BED
AND TEMPORARy CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THEREFOR)
CLAIM REJECTION
RESOLUTION NO. 56-84
A RESOLUTION REJECTING CLAIM
(GENE COULTER)
CLAIM REJECTION
RESOLUTION NO. 57-84
A RESOLUTION DENYING APPLICATION TO FILE
A LATE AMENDMENT TO A CLAIM
(ROBERT TERRY)
MINUTES AND SUMMARIES
The Planning Commission summary from the meeting of March 20 and
the Planning Commission minutes from the meeting of March 6,
1984, were noted.
The Airport Commission minutes of March 12, 1984, were noted.
PAYROLL AND CLAIM
There were claims in the amount of $1,002,678.64 dated March 8,
1984; and $520,918.61 dated March 15, 1984.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
RDP EXEMPT CATEGORIES
The Council received a report and recommendation regarding
possible modifications to the Residential Development Policy and
General Plan as it relates to the low/moderate income housing
exemptions.
CM-39-108
March 26, 1984
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(continued)
RDP EXEMPT
CATEGORIES (cont'd)
The report explained that the City's General Plan and the
implementing Residential Development Policy (RDP), provide that
subsidized housing projects are exempt from the two percent growth
rate limitation (and RDP competition). Such exemption applies to
projects that remain available to low income persons for 10 years.
The General Plan and implementing RDP program were developed when
such government subsidized programs were relatively limited, easily
identifiable, and provided housing assistance primarily directed to
rental housing.
However, the nature of government subsidized housinq programs has
changed during the last four years. Local/state bond programs have
recently been used to develop "for sale" subsidized housing in
Livermore and strong indications are that such bond monies will
continue to motivate developments to use this exemption to the RDP.
The staff recommends that the Council adopt the attached resolution
which would instruct the Planning Commission to review the General
Plan's exemption for subsidized housing projects and recommend what,
if any, changes in the General Plan and RDP may be appropriate.
ON THE MOTION OF CM KAMENA, SECONDED BY CM STEIN, AND BY A 5-0 VOTE,
A RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED WITH THE CLARIFICATION THAT ANY AND ALL
GENERAL PLAN AND RDP EXEMPTIONS BE REVIEWED.
RESOLUTION NO. 58-84
A RESOLUTION INSTRUCTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW THE
GROWTH RATE EXEMPTION FOR GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED PROJECTS
Clarence Hoenig, Tyler Avenue, suggested that the Planning Commission
also look at and define the definition of low income.
INTENT TO PURCHASE
.POLICE VEHICLES
The City Manager explained the City must notify the State of its
intent to purchase police patrol vehicles through the State's bidding
process. Even though these vehicles would not be purchased or
delivered until late 1984, the State still needs to have some idea as
to how many vehicles they will need to purchase. A letter of intent
does not bind the City, but we would have to make a final commitment
before July 1, 1984.
ON THE MOTION OF CM STEIN, SECONDED BY CM BROWN, AND BY A 5-0 VOTE,
THE LETTER OF INTENT WAS APPROVED.
CM-39-109
.......................... 1T' .......................... T
March 26, 1984
ORDINANCES
ORDINANCE ADOPTION -
PREZONING - ISABEL AVE.
ON THE MOTION OF CM KAMENA, SECONDED BY CM BROWN, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, THE ORDINANCE WAS ADOPTED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1157
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 442, AS AMENDED,
OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, BY AMENDING SECTION 3.00
THEREOF, RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
(PREZONING PROPERTY ON ISABEL AVENUE)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
AB 2894
COLLECTOR STREETS
A letter was received from Mayor Peggy Mensigner, Modesto,
requesting support on AB 2894 which gives cities greater control
of safety on residential collector streets.
ON THE MOTION OF CM KAMENA, SECONDED BY CM BROWN, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO SEND A LETTER OF SUPPORT TO
ASSEMBLYMAN BAKER.
SB 1585
SPORTS FRANCHISES
A letter was received from Mayor Lionel Wilson, Oakland,
requesting that Livermore oppose SB 1585 which excludes
"professional sports franchises,, from the definition of property
acquirable by eminent domain.
ON THE MOTION OF CM BROWN, SECONDED BY C KAMENA, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, THE STAFF WAS DIRECTED TO SEND LETTER OPPOSING SB 1585.
MATTERS INITIATED
Closed Session
Tom Curry, City Attorney, requested a closed session following
the meeting to discuss potential litigation.
Morgan Pacific Tract
CM Kamena asked if the Morgan Pacific issue regarding street
alignment and map processing has been resolved and if not it
should go onto the next agenda. '
CM-39-110
March 26, 1984
MATTERS INITIATED
Signs
VM Wieskamp stated that there appears to be a proliferation of
illegal signs in the downtown area.
CM Stein suggested that the sign regarding the wine centennial be
removed from the golf course.
Appreciation Dinner
CM Brown pointed out that the Civic Appreciation Dinner has been
scheduled during the Easter week vacation. She and CM Kamena would
not be able to attend and requested that the date be changed.
V.A. Pipeline
CM Brown requested that the issue of the V.A. pipeline be on the
April 9 agenda.
JOB TRAINING
PARTNERSHIP - ACT
(JTPA)- BERKELEY
' CM Stein, with concensus of Council, directed staff to send a letter
of support to the City of Berkeley regarding their participation in
the JTPA.
NEW BUSINESS
HANDICAP ACCESS
The Council received a report from the Social Concerns Committee
regarding handicap access improvements.
Hector Timourian and Harry Silcock, representing the Social Concerns
Committee, reviewed the Committee findings and the locations for curb
cuts as recommended by the Committee.
ON THE MOTION OF CM KAMENA, SECONDED BY VM WIESKAMP, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, THE REPORT WAS ACCEPTED AND REFERRED TO STAFF FOR
RECOMMENDATIONS ON IMPLEMENTATION.
CABLE TELEVISION
The Council received a letter from the Citizens Cable Television
Advisory Committee recommending the hiring of a consultant for
assistance with the cable franchise ordinance and agreement.
CM-39-111
March 26, 1984
NEW BUSINESS
(continued)
CABLE TELEVISION
(continued)
The City Manager explained that staff is unable to devote the
required time to put this material together, and this is where
the assistance of a consultant would be of value.
ON THE MOTION OF CM KAMENA, SECONDED BY CM BROWN, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION WAS ADOPTED TO HIRE A
CONSULTANT.
CALTRANS - STIP
Council considered a report recommending that Council adopt a
resolution requesting Caltrans to place 1-580 interchange~at
Collier Canyon and Airway Boulevard on the 1984-85 State
Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP).
The staff explained the interchange at Collier Canyon Road
(Kitty Hawk) must be constructed and the one at Airway Boulevard
must be modified as a condition of the Triad and Foley
developments. The work is planned to be included in the proposed
1984 WeSt Assessment District. The projects must first be on the
Caltrans STIP plan and the deadline for the coming year is April
1, 1984. Having the projects on the STIP allows Caltrans to go
ahead with the planning and design work; it does not necessarily
guarantee construction.
ON THE MOTION OF VM WIESKAMP, SECONDED BY CM KAMENA, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, A RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED REQUESTING PROJECT PLACEMENT ON
STIP.
RESOLUTION NO. 59-84
A RESOLUTION TO REQUEST CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
TO PLACE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE
STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN
LAVWMA ELECTION
CM Stein had requested this item so that the Council could
discuss and possibly take an official position regarding the June
LAVWMA ballot measure.
CM Stein stated that he felt Mayor Turner's signing the rebuttal
argument regarding this measure was inappropriate and possibly
invalid. He asked the Council to adopt a resolution stating the
majority position as opposing the ballot measure. He read a
suggested form.
CM-39-112
March 26, 1984
NEW BUSINESS
(continued)
LAVWMA ELECTION
(continued)
CM STEIN MOVED TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION, SECONDED BY CM BROWN.
Mayor Turner responded that he did not feel his signature was
inappropriate or that it misrepresented the majority of the Council
since he could not find it in the city records where the Livermore
City Council had ever voted to oppose the 4.4 mgd. He went on to say
that his signature represented his position as mayor and that he did
not feel it was any abuse of power.
CM Brown stated that she felt the Mayor's signature reflects
confusion and since he represents the Council, his roll should
reflect the majority of the body.
CM Kamena stated that he felt the Mayor's signature on the rebuttal
was "outrageous and intolerable" and that the Mayor's responsibility
is to represent the majority of the Council.
VM Wieskamp said that she recalled that the Council asked the LAVWMA
Board to reaccess the wording on the ballot and the request was
refused. However, she felt the voters need to be aware of the
different views that councilmembers may have on this and similar
matters.
Mayor Turner stated that~as mayor of the City, he attempts to reflect
and represent the view of the Council; however, the bottom line on
this matter is that the City of Livermore needs the additional
capacity to serve our projects and that as long as he is mayor, he
will speak out on these issues.
In response to VM Wieskamp's question regarding the date line for the
short-term capacity, Jerry Peeler stated that the 3.1 mgd could be on
line in two years.
CM Brown stated that she felt Livermore had been "steamrolled" by
Pleasanton and DSRSD.
Janis Cargo stated that she supports the Mayor's position and feels
that he has a right to represent his constituents.
Mary Stullich stated that she does not feel the majority of the
Council is representing the majority of the people.
Clarence Hoenig stated that the ballot measure seeks part of
Livermore's share and that the views of the majority of the Council
are to get a fair share for Livermore.
CM-39-113
March 26, 1984
NEW BUSINESS
(continued)
LA~4MA ELECTION
(continued)
CM Stein stated that the City will not need more capacity for 4-5
years and pointed out that residential development does not pay
its own way and that the City Council has approved large amounts
of industrial and commercial developments which is truly our tax
base.
THE MAIN MOTION WAS VOTED ON BY A ROLL CALL VOTE: VM WIESKAMP,
NO; CM KAMENA, YES; CM BROWN, YES; CM STEIN, YES; MAYOR TURNER,
NO. MOTION PASSED 3-2 (VM WIESKAMP AND MAYOR TURNER IN
MINORITY).
RESOLUTION NO. 60-84
A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE LAVWMA BALLOT MEASURE·
AT THE JUNE, 1984 PRIMARY ELECTION.
CITY GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT - DOTY
PROPERTY
The City has received a referral from Alameda County for an
industrial project located on the east side of Greenville Road,
north of Patterson Pass Road. The applicant proposes to divide a
289 acre parcel into 128 industrial lots for heavy industrial
use.
Staff feels that the City should take a position opposing this
project. There are several issues to be addressed. They include
the basic planning issues of whether the project is appropriate
to the site, site planning issues, and EIR issues.
ON THE MOTION OF CM BROWN, SECONDED BY CM STEIN, AND BY A 5-0
VOTE, THE COUNCIL MOVED TO OFFICIALLY OPPOSE THIS PROJECT.
WEST ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT
The staff requested that Council schedule a study session
regarding the West Assessment District which includes Triad,
Foley, and numerous other properties in and around the airport to
discuss the boundaries as well as the entire project before staff
moves forward.
By consensus, the Council agreed to meet in a study session on
Thursday, April 5, at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Court.
CM-39-114
March 26, 1984
NEW BUSINESS
(continued)
CITY BOARDS/
COMMISSIONS
A letter of resignation was accepted from Ron Furtado, Business and
Industrial Advisory Board.
Margaret Hackenberg was appointed to the Cable Television Advisory
Committee.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 p.m. to a study session on April 5
at 7:30 p.m. to discuss the proposed West Assessment District and to
a closed session immediately following tonight's meeting to discuss
potential litigation.
The next regular meeting of the City Council will ~e April 9, 1984.
ATTEST
CM-39-115