Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
TBP 2024-01-03
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday January 3, 2024 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnl7d -kk0j1cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Information https://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting ID: 259 040 8013 Phone 1 -346 -248 -7799 Roll Call Approval Of Agenda Consent Agenda Minutes December 6, 2023 TBM 2023 -12 -06.Pdf Sign In Sheet December 6, 2023.Pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting Location Resolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting Location.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -03 Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe Miller Resolution 2024 -01 -03 A Resolution Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe Miller.pdf Billy Joe Miller Sculpture Purchase.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand Foundation Resolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand Foundation.pdf Grand Foundation Fiscal Sponsorship TOF Windy Gap Fund Grant Storm Water Study MOU.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSA Resolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSA.pdf Open Forum a. Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on a future agenda please contact the Town Clerk) Discussion And Possible Action Regarding Economical Benefits Of Historic Preservations - Shanna Ganne Economical Benefits Of Historic Preservations.pdf Fraser Valley Arts Update - Steve Fitzgerald Rate Study - Raftelis And Paul Staff Briefing Rate Study.pdf Fraser Board Rate PPT 101823.Pdf Fraser 10 Year Water Capital Improvement Plan Adopted May 17, 2023.Pdf Granby North Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdf Granby South Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdf Winter Park Ranch Schedule Of Water And Sewer Tap Fees And Charges.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -02 Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust Regarding Victoria Village Natural Protected Area - Sarah C TB Staff Brief Modifying Victoria Village Protected Natural Area.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -02 Authorizing Town Staff To Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust.pdf GES1 Fraser Victoria Village PNA Brief 18Dec23.Pdf GES2 Fraser VV Appendix A Map Sheets 1 And 4 14Dec23 (5).Pdf GES3 Fraser VV Appendix B PNA Considerations 24Oct23d.pdf GES4 Fraser VV CHLT Property Application Packet.pdf GES5 Fraser VV 404 Regulatory Brief 12Dec23.Pdf Meadows At Grand Park Plat Extension Request - Garrett 00 Meadows At GP Plat Extension Request.pdf Resolution 2019 -02 -02 Approving Final Plat And Plan The Meadows At Grand Park.pdf Ordinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism - Michael Ordinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism.pdf Ordinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance - Michael Ordinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy - Antoinette Resolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy.pdf Mayor Resignation Staff Memo.pdf Vandernail Resignation 1-3 -2024.Pdf Updates Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2024 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Please contact the Town Clerk to request accommodations to assist people with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Listening devices for people with hearing impairment are available upon request. Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh 970 -531 -9943 or amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us 1.6:00 P.M. 2. 3. a. Documents: b. Documents: c. Documents: d. Documents: e. Documents: 4. 5. a. Documents: b. c. Documents: d. Documents: e. Documents: f. Documents: g. Documents: h. Documents: 6. 7. Board Staff Direct : Define the service, product or value to be delivered Lead : Future focused planning Protect : Establish the operational boundaries to be respected by Staff and monitored by the Board Manage : Now focused policy and procedural guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on target service delivery Enable : Advocacy, resource development, and role discipline Accomplish : Ensure the work defined by the direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday January 3, 2024 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnl7d -kk0j1cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Informationhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting ID: 259 040 8013 Phone 1 -346 -248 -7799Roll CallApproval Of AgendaConsent AgendaMinutes December 6, 2023TBM 2023 -12 -06.PdfSign In Sheet December 6, 2023.PdfResolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting LocationResolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting Location.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -03 Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe Miller Resolution 2024 -01 -03 A Resolution Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe Miller.pdf Billy Joe Miller Sculpture Purchase.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand Foundation Resolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand Foundation.pdf Grand Foundation Fiscal Sponsorship TOF Windy Gap Fund Grant Storm Water Study MOU.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSA Resolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSA.pdf Open Forum a. Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on a future agenda please contact the Town Clerk) Discussion And Possible Action Regarding Economical Benefits Of Historic Preservations - Shanna Ganne Economical Benefits Of Historic Preservations.pdf Fraser Valley Arts Update - Steve Fitzgerald Rate Study - Raftelis And Paul Staff Briefing Rate Study.pdf Fraser Board Rate PPT 101823.Pdf Fraser 10 Year Water Capital Improvement Plan Adopted May 17, 2023.Pdf Granby North Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdf Granby South Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdf Winter Park Ranch Schedule Of Water And Sewer Tap Fees And Charges.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -02 Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust Regarding Victoria Village Natural Protected Area - Sarah C TB Staff Brief Modifying Victoria Village Protected Natural Area.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -02 Authorizing Town Staff To Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust.pdf GES1 Fraser Victoria Village PNA Brief 18Dec23.Pdf GES2 Fraser VV Appendix A Map Sheets 1 And 4 14Dec23 (5).Pdf GES3 Fraser VV Appendix B PNA Considerations 24Oct23d.pdf GES4 Fraser VV CHLT Property Application Packet.pdf GES5 Fraser VV 404 Regulatory Brief 12Dec23.Pdf Meadows At Grand Park Plat Extension Request - Garrett 00 Meadows At GP Plat Extension Request.pdf Resolution 2019 -02 -02 Approving Final Plat And Plan The Meadows At Grand Park.pdf Ordinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism - Michael Ordinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism.pdf Ordinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance - Michael Ordinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy - Antoinette Resolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy.pdf Mayor Resignation Staff Memo.pdf Vandernail Resignation 1-3 -2024.Pdf Updates Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2024 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Please contact the Town Clerk to request accommodations to assist people with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Listening devices for people with hearing impairment are available upon request. Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh 970 -531 -9943 or amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us 1.6:00 P.M.2.3.a.Documents:b.Documents:c. Documents: d. Documents: e. Documents: 4. 5. a. Documents: b. c. Documents: d. Documents: e. Documents: f. Documents: g. Documents: h. Documents: 6. 7. Board Staff Direct : Define the service, product or value to be delivered Lead : Future focused planning Protect : Establish the operational boundaries to be respected by Staff and monitored by the Board Manage : Now focused policy and procedural guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on target service delivery Enable : Advocacy, resource development, and role discipline Accomplish : Ensure the work defined by the direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday January 3, 2024 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnl7d -kk0j1cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Informationhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting ID: 259 040 8013 Phone 1 -346 -248 -7799Roll CallApproval Of AgendaConsent AgendaMinutes December 6, 2023TBM 2023 -12 -06.PdfSign In Sheet December 6, 2023.PdfResolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting LocationResolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting Location.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -03 Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe MillerResolution 2024 -01 -03 A Resolution Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe Miller.pdfBilly Joe Miller Sculpture Purchase.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand FoundationResolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand Foundation.pdfGrand Foundation Fiscal Sponsorship TOF Windy Gap Fund Grant Storm Water Study MOU.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSAResolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSA.pdfOpen Foruma. Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on a future agenda please contact the Town Clerk)Discussion And Possible Action RegardingEconomical Benefits Of Historic Preservations - Shanna GanneEconomical Benefits Of Historic Preservations.pdfFraser Valley Arts Update - Steve FitzgeraldRate Study - Raftelis And PaulStaff Briefing Rate Study.pdfFraser Board Rate PPT 101823.PdfFraser 10 Year Water Capital Improvement Plan Adopted May 17, 2023.PdfGranby North Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdfGranby South Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdfWinter Park Ranch Schedule Of Water And Sewer Tap Fees And Charges.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -02 Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust Regarding Victoria Village Natural Protected Area - Sarah C TB Staff Brief Modifying Victoria Village Protected Natural Area.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -02 Authorizing Town Staff To Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust.pdf GES1 Fraser Victoria Village PNA Brief 18Dec23.Pdf GES2 Fraser VV Appendix A Map Sheets 1 And 4 14Dec23 (5).Pdf GES3 Fraser VV Appendix B PNA Considerations 24Oct23d.pdf GES4 Fraser VV CHLT Property Application Packet.pdf GES5 Fraser VV 404 Regulatory Brief 12Dec23.Pdf Meadows At Grand Park Plat Extension Request - Garrett 00 Meadows At GP Plat Extension Request.pdf Resolution 2019 -02 -02 Approving Final Plat And Plan The Meadows At Grand Park.pdf Ordinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism - Michael Ordinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism.pdf Ordinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance - Michael Ordinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance.pdf Resolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy - Antoinette Resolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy.pdf Mayor Resignation Staff Memo.pdf Vandernail Resignation 1-3 -2024.Pdf Updates Adjourn UPCOMING MEETING WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2024 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Please contact the Town Clerk to request accommodations to assist people with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Listening devices for people with hearing impairment are available upon request. Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh 970 -531 -9943 or amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us 1.6:00 P.M.2.3.a.Documents:b.Documents:c.Documents:d.Documents:e.Documents:4.5.a.Documents:b.c.Documents:d. Documents: e. Documents: f. Documents: g. Documents: h. Documents: 6. 7. Board Staff Direct : Define the service, product or value to be delivered Lead : Future focused planning Protect : Establish the operational boundaries to be respected by Staff and monitored by the Board Manage : Now focused policy and procedural guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on target service delivery Enable : Advocacy, resource development, and role discipline Accomplish : Ensure the work defined by the direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Agenda Fraser Town Hall, 153 Fraser Avenue and Virtually Wednesday January 3, 2024 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM Members of the Board may have dinner together @ 5:30 p.m. NOTE: Times are approximate and agenda subject to change Watch the meeting live on Fraser's YouTube Channelhttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCs5aHnl7d -kk0j1cxV28DSg Participate in the meeting through our virtual platform Zoom Meeting Informationhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/2590408013 Meeting ID: 259 040 8013 Phone 1 -346 -248 -7799Roll CallApproval Of AgendaConsent AgendaMinutes December 6, 2023TBM 2023 -12 -06.PdfSign In Sheet December 6, 2023.PdfResolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting LocationResolution 2024 -01 -01 Official Posting Location.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -03 Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe MillerResolution 2024 -01 -03 A Resolution Approving The Purchase Of A Sculpture By The Acclaimed Artist Billy Joe Miller.pdfBilly Joe Miller Sculpture Purchase.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand FoundationResolution 2024 -01 -04 Authoring Town Manager To Sign A Fiscal Sponsorship MOU With Grand Foundation.pdfGrand Foundation Fiscal Sponsorship TOF Windy Gap Fund Grant Storm Water Study MOU.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSAResolution 2024 -01 -05 Fraser River Valley Housing Partnership Sponsorship CIRSA.pdfOpen Foruma. Business not on the agenda (If you would like to request time on a future agenda please contact the Town Clerk)Discussion And Possible Action RegardingEconomical Benefits Of Historic Preservations - Shanna GanneEconomical Benefits Of Historic Preservations.pdfFraser Valley Arts Update - Steve FitzgeraldRate Study - Raftelis And PaulStaff Briefing Rate Study.pdfFraser Board Rate PPT 101823.PdfFraser 10 Year Water Capital Improvement Plan Adopted May 17, 2023.PdfGranby North Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdfGranby South Service Area Water - 2024 Rates And Fees.pdfWinter Park Ranch Schedule Of Water And Sewer Tap Fees And Charges.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -02 Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust Regarding Victoria Village Natural Protected Area - Sarah CTB Staff Brief Modifying Victoria Village Protected Natural Area.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -02 Authorizing Town Staff To Apply To The Colorado Headwaters Land Trust.pdfGES1 Fraser Victoria Village PNA Brief 18Dec23.PdfGES2 Fraser VV Appendix A Map Sheets 1 And 4 14Dec23 (5).PdfGES3 Fraser VV Appendix B PNA Considerations 24Oct23d.pdfGES4 Fraser VV CHLT Property Application Packet.pdfGES5 Fraser VV 404 Regulatory Brief 12Dec23.PdfMeadows At Grand Park Plat Extension Request - Garrett00 Meadows At GP Plat Extension Request.pdfResolution 2019 -02 -02 Approving Final Plat And Plan The Meadows At Grand Park.pdfOrdinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism - MichaelOrdinance 506 Adding Article 4 Chapter 10 Eradication Of Graffiti Vandalism.pdfOrdinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance - MichaelOrdinance 507 Amending Chapter 7 Article 2 Graffiti Vandalism Nuisance.pdfResolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy - AntoinetteResolution 2024 -01 -06 Accepting The Resignation Of The Mayor And Filling The Vacancy.pdfMayor Resignation Staff Memo.pdfVandernail Resignation 1-3 -2024.PdfUpdatesAdjournUPCOMING MEETINGWEDNESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2024 BOARD OF TRUSTEES Please contact the Town Clerk to request accommodations to assist people with disabilities to participate in public meetings. Listening devices for people with hearing impairment are available upon request. Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh 970 -531 -9943 or amcveigh@town.fraser.co.us 1.6:00 P.M.2.3.a.Documents:b.Documents:c.Documents:d.Documents:e.Documents:4.5.a.Documents:b.c.Documents:d.Documents:e.Documents:f.Documents:g.Documents:h.Documents:6.7. Board Staff Direct : Define the service, product or value to be delivered Lead : Future focused planning Protect : Establish the operational boundaries to be respected by Staff and monitored by the Board Manage : Now focused policy and procedural guidance to ensure on time, on budget, and on target service delivery Enable : Advocacy, resource development, and role discipline Accomplish : Ensure the work defined by the direction of the Board of Trustees is accomplished FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES DATE:December 6, 2023 MEETING:Board of Trustees Regular Meeting PLACE:Fraser Town Hall Board Room and Virtually PRESENT Board:Mayor Philip Vandernail; Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Brian Cerkvenik, Kaydee Fisher, Lewis Gregory, Parnell Quinn and, Katie Soles Staff:Town Manager, Michael Brack; Town Clerk, Antoinette McVeigh; Deputy Clerk, Katelyn Starks; Assistant Town Manager, Sarah Catanzarite; Public Works Director, Paul Johnson; Town Planner, Garrett Scott; Marketing and Communications Manager, Sarah Wieck; Police Chief Glen Trainor Others:Kim Crawford, Bill Shrum, Troy Bernberg, Becky Allison, Colleen Cerkvenik, Matt Barlow Mayor Vandernail called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. 1.Rollcall: Mayor Philip Vandernail; Mayor Pro-Tem Eileen Waldow; Trustees; Brian Cerkvenik, Kaydee Fisher, Lewis Gregory, Parnell Quinn and, Katie Soles 2.Approval of Agenda: Trustee Cerkvenik moved to approve the agenda amending the consent agenda to include items 5b Resolution 2023-12-04 Town Of Fraser Approving Donor Advised Funding Requests 5d. Resolution 2023-12-01 Authorizing Mayor To Sign An Agreement For Deferral Of Plant Investment Fees 406 Zerex, 5e Resolution 2023-12-02 Authorizing Mayor To Sign An Agreement For Economic Incentives Birdie Lounge LLC, 5f Resolution 2023-12-03 Authorizing Mayor To Sign An Agreement For Economic Incentives Simple Coffee Co. and remove item 3c Resolution 2023-12-06 Merrick Task Order 4 Utility Exploration For Quail Dr. Waterline Looping And Planned PRV Install, no second Motion failed 3-4 Nay Mayor Vandernail, Trustees Soles, Gregory and Waldow. Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to approve the agenda. Motion carried: 7-0. 3.Consent Agenda: a)Minutes November 15, 2023 b)Resolution 2023-12-05 Contract with Metron for Meter Replacement Installation c)Resolution 2023-12-06 Merrick Task Order 4 Utility Exploration for Quail Dr. Waterline Looping and Planned PRV Install d)Resolution 2023-12-07 Merrick Task Order 3 Utility Model Operation and Maintenance e)Resolution 2023-12-08 Three Mile Plan Page 2 of 3 Trustee Gregory moved, and Trustee Soles seconded the motion to approve the consent agenda removing item 3c Resolution 2023-12-06 Merrick Task Order 4 Utility Exploration for Quail Dr. Waterline Looping and Planned PRV Install. Motion carried 7- 0. 4. Open Forum: none 5.Discussion and Possible Action: a)Fraser Branding Sarah Wieck Marketing and Communications Manager and Ryan Burk and Lacy Mase of Slate Communications presented. The Board took no action. Slate Communications will continue to work on the brands with the Trustees. b)Resolution 2023-12-04 Town of Fraser Approving Donor Advised Funding Requests Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to approve the Resolution 2023-12-04 Town of Fraser Approving Donor Advised Funding Requests Motion carried: 7-0. c)Ordinance No. 505 Establishment of Downtown Development Authority and Calling an Election Kim Crawford of Butler-Snow, Troy Bernberg and Bill Shrum of DCI presented to the board. Trustee Quinn moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to approve Ordinance No. 505 Establishment of Downtown Development Authority and Calling an Election including adjustments to the map including area of town boundaries north of Safeway, removing Cornerstone properties and including areas around Lions ponds and updating the legal description. Motion carried: 7-0. d)Resolution 2023-12-01 Authorizing Mayor to Sign an Agreement for Deferral of Plant Investment Fees 406 Zerex e)Resolution 2023-12-02 Authorizing Mayor to Sign an Agreement for Economic Incentives Birdie Lounge LLC f)Resolution 2023-12-03 Authorizing Mayor to Sign an Agreement for Economic Incentives Simple Coffee Co Trustee Cerkvenik moved, and Trustee Soles seconded the motion to approve 5d Resolution 2023-12-01 Authorizing Mayor to Sign an Agreement for Deferral of Plant Investment Fees 406 Zerex, 5e Resolution 2023-12-02 Authorizing Mayor to Sign an Agreement for Economic Incentives Birdie Lounge LLC, 5f Resolution 2023-12-03 Authorizing Mayor to Sign an Agreement for Economic Incentives Simple Coffee Co. Motion carried 5-2, Nay Mayor Vandernail and Trustee Waldow. Page 3 of 3 g)Ordinance No. 504 Amending Chapter 2 Article 1 Regarding Fair Campaign Practices Act Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to approve Ordinance No. 504 Amending Chapter 2 Article 1 Regarding Fair Campaign Practices Act. Motion carried: 7-0. 6.Public Hearing and Possible Action a)Ordinance 503 Adopting A Revised Official Zoning District Map Trustee moved, and Trustee seconded the motion to approve Ordinance 503 Adopting a Revised Official Zoning District Map No Public Comment was taken. Trustee Cerkvenik moved, and Trustee Quinn seconded the motion to approve Ordinance 503 Adopting A Revised Official Zoning District Map Motion carried: 7-0. b)Ordinance 505 Adopting by Reference The 2021 International Building Codes No Public Comment was taken. Trustee Quinn moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to approve Ordinance 505 Adopting by Reference The 2021 International Building Codes. Motion carried: 7-0. 7.Updates: a) Trustee Cerkvenik, BOCC meeting regarding Byers Peak Ranch b) Public Works Director Johnson, the Cozens Meadow bathrooms will have water and sewer connected next week. 8.Adjourn: Trustee Soles moved, and Trustee Cerkvenik seconded the motion to adjourn. Motion carried: 7-0. Meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. _____________________________ Antoinette McVeigh, Town Clerk TOWN BOARD REGULAR MEETING REGISTRATION SHEET DECEMBER 6, 2023 The Public Forum is an opportunity for the public to present their concerns and recommendations regarding Town Government issues to the Town Board. Those wishing to address the Town Board will be allowed a three -minute presentation. A maximum of six (6) people will be allowed to address the Town Board at each Public Forum. If a topic that you wish to discuss has been scheduled for a formal Town Board Meeting, we would ask that you reserve your remarks for that specific date and time. Topics that are in litigation with the Town will not be heard during this forum. All presenters are urged to: (1) state the concern; and (2) list possible solutions. Please keep the following guidelines in mind: • Remarks that discriminate against anyone or adversely reflect upon the race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, political affiliation, disability, sex, or marital status of any person are out of order and may end the speaker's privilege to address the Board. • Defamatory or abusive remarks or profanity are out of order and will not be tolerated. Anyone attending Town Board meetings must sign in to ensure accurate records and minutes. Sign your name, address, and email on the sign in sheet. Thank you for your cooperation. NAME PHYSICAL ADDRESS EMAIL Aw-f 4°0 Jet- 6 ela-111--- :71:0J k — 1\it (i)C.e\ (AA NW '92 3 - --(A-C OW) g 7Aye/3 TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01-01 A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE PUBLIC PLACE FOR POSTING NOTICES WHEREAS,C.R.S.§24-6-402(2)(c)requires the Town to annually designate the public place for posting notices to comply with the Colorado Open Meetings Law,C.R.S.§24-6-402, et seq. (the "Open Meetings Law"); WHEREAS, consistent with House Bill 19-1087, the Town hereby desires to post notice of the Town's public meetings on the Town's website as the Town's official online presence to the greatest extent practicable; and WHEREAS,the intent of the general assembly is to relieve a local government of the requirement to physically post meeting notices.On and after July 1,2019,a local public body shall be deemed to have given full and timely notice of a public meeting if the local public body posts the notice,with specific agenda information if available,no less than twenty-four hours prior to the holding of the meeting on a public website of the local public body.The notices are accessible to the public at no charge.The notices shall be searchable,if feasible,by type of meeting,date and time of meeting,and agenda contents.A local government that posts notices of public meetings on its website may continue to post the notices in a physical location but is not required to do so. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1.Designation.The Board of Trustees of the Town of Fraser,in compliance with C.R.S.§24-6-402(2)(c)of the Open Meetings Law,hereby designates the Town website at www.frasercolorado.com as the official place for posting notices.The Town may additionally post notices at Fraser Town Hall,located at 153 Fraser Avenue and the Fraser Post Office, located at 520 Zerex Street.If there is a known outage or an emergency meeting,the Town may post a physical notice at the public entrance of the Fraser Town Hall. DULY MOVED, SECONDED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2024. Votes in favor: ___BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01-03 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A SCULPTURE BY THE ACCLAIMED ARTIST BILLY JOE MILLER WHEREAS, The Fraser Public Arts committee is recommending purchase of the sculpture by Billy Joe Miller WHEREAS, The purchase will be paid for with the Art in Public Places Budget split between 2023 and 2024. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1.The Town Manager is authorized to purchase the Billy Joe Miller Sculpture. DULY MOVED, SECONDED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2024. Votes in favor: ___BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk MEMO TO: Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM: Sarah Wieck, Marketing and Communications Manager DATE: January 3, 2024 SUBJECT: Sculpture Purchase MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Proposal for the acquisition of a sculpture by acclaimed artist Billy Joe Miller. BACKGROUND: The Fraser Public Arts Committee has picked a sculpture by Billy Joe Miller for purchase by the Town of Fraser; because of the price, they have recommended splitting it between two years. The proposed acquisition will be funded from the 2023 and 2024 Art in Public Places budget. Billy Joe Miller is a renowned artist with a distinctive style that resonates with diverse audiences. His work often captures the essence of our surroundings, adding depth and meaning to public spaces. Public art fosters community engagement and contributes to a vibrant cultural scene. This acquisition aligns with our mission to enrich the lives of residents and visitors alike. The addition of this sculpture by Billy Joe Miller will significantly enhance our town's artistic landscape and contribute to the cultural legacy of Fraser. Your support for this acquisition will further our commitment to fostering a vibrant and engaging community. BUDGET: $30,000 paid for through Art in Public Places 2023 and 2024 budget RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Trustees' approval to move forward with the sculpture purchase. Sculpture Video Preview AGREEMENT BETWEEN TOWN OF FRASER AND WILLIAM JOSEPH MILLER (BILLY JOE MILLER) This Agreement is between Town of Fraser and William Joseph Miller (Artist), Sandia Park, New Mexico. Section I—Purpose Town of Fraser and Artist agree that Artist shall design, fabricate, and deliver an original work of public art (the Art) at Town of Fraser on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement. Section II—Scope of Work Design Artist shall develop and design the Art for the Town of Fraser Fabrication and Installation Artist is responsible for the costs of fabrication of the Art, including the hiring and payment of all subcontractors necessary for the design and fabrication of the Art, and for costs of transportation of the Art from fabrication sites to Fraser. Artist and team will help with the installation at the Town of Fraser who will be responsible for the artwork’s installation, foundation and anchoring system. Section III—Artist’s Fee and Terms of Payment Artist’s fee is $30,000.00 payable in two installments. The first installment of $15,000.00 shall be paid by February 1st 2023. The second installment of $15,000.00 shall be paid to Artist not later than 30 days following installation of the Art. Section IV—Completion and delivery of the Art The Art shall be completed and delivered no later than June 30, 2024 unless agreed upon by both parties. Section V—Copyright Artist shall retain ownership of his preparatory designs, drawings, photographs, schematics, and notes. Artist owns copyright to similar designs, works and physical sculpture replicas outside of the Town of Fraser. Section VI—Amendment in Writing This Agreement may be amended in writing by the parties at any time. Town of Fraser Signature:____________________________ Date:_________________________ William Joseph Miller, Artist Signature:____________________________ Date:_________________________ TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01-04 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO SIGN A FISCAL SPONSORSHIP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH GRAND FOUNDATION WHEREAS,the Town of Fraser has been awarded a grant of $150,000 from the Windy Gap Environmental Fund for a Storm Sewer System Audit &Storm Water Management Plan Project: and WHEREAS,the Windy Gap Environmental Fund requires that an entity with 501(c)(3) status receives and manages awarded funds; and WHEREAS,the Grand Foundation is a non-profit corporation with 501(c)(3)status who has offered to serve as the Town’s fiscal sponsor for this project; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: The Town of Fraser Board of Trustees authorizes the Town Manager to sign the 2023-24 Fiscal Sponsorship Memorandum of Understanding with the Grand Foundation for the Town of Fraser Storm Sewer System Audit and Water Management Plan Project. READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF January 2024. Votes in favor: ___BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk Page 1 of 3 2023-24 FISCAL SPONSORSHIP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This is a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between The Town of Fraser, and Grand Foundation as fiscal sponsor (the Sponsor) for a period of one year, beginning on January 1, 2024 and ending December 31, 2024. The Sponsor:The Sponsor is a non-profit corporation,exempt from federal tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”). The Project: Town of Fraser Storm Sewer System Audit & Storm Water Management Plan The Agreement:The Sponsor is willing to receive grants for the benefit and use of implementing programs of the Project.The Project,with the administrative assistance of the Sponsor,desires to use these funds in order to implement the Project’s purposes. Through this MOU, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions: 1.Receipt of funds:The Sponsor agrees to receive grants,contributions,and gifts to be used for the Project, and to make those funds available to the Project. 2.Acknowledgment of charitable donations on behalf of the Project:The Sponsor agrees that all grants,charitable contributions and gifts which it receives for the Project will be reported as contributions to the Sponsor as required by law,and further agrees to acknowledge receipt of any such grant,charitable contribution or gift in writing and to furnish evidence of its status as an exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3)to the donor upon request.The Sponsor agrees to notify the Project of any change in its tax-exempt status. 3.Protection of tax-exempt status:The Project agrees not to use funds received from the Sponsor in any way which would jeopardize the tax-exempt status of the Sponsor.The Project agrees to comply with any written request by the Sponsor that it cease activities which might jeopardize the Sponsor’s tax status,and further agrees that the Sponsor’s obligation to make funds available to it is suspended in the event that it fails to comply with any such request.Any changes in the purpose for which grant funds are spent must be approved in writing by the Sponsor before implementation. The Sponsor retains the right,if the Project breaches this MOU,or if the Project jeopardizes the Sponsor’s legal or tax status, to withhold, withdraw, or demand immediate return of grant funds. 4.Use of funds:The Sponsor also authorizes the Project to make expenditures,which do not exceed total contributions for the Project,on its behalf for use in the Project.The Project agrees to use any and all funds received from the Sponsor solely for legitimate expenses of the Project and to account fully to the Sponsor for the disbursement of these funds.On behalf of and with its funds,the Sponsor will pay for the Project’s direct expenses like salary and benefits for Project staff,computers, and travel and meeting expenses.The Sponsor will obtain authorization from the Project to pay these expenses using the Project’s funds. 5.Financial procedures:The Project must act within the financial policies outlined in the Sponsor’s Financial Procedures Manual.Subjects of particular interest to the Project include:Cash Disbursements,Purchasing,Travel and Expenses,Consultants,Grants and Contracts,and Other – Fiscal Sponsor Status. 6.Financial accounting and reporting:The Sponsor will maintain books and financial records for the Project in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.The Project’s revenue and expenses shall be separately classed in the books of the Sponsor.The Sponsor will provide reports Page 2 of 3 reflecting revenue and expenses to The Project on a monthly basis,within two weeks after the end of each month,and,on an annual basis,within one month after the end of each fiscal year of The Sponsor. 7.Employment:Unless otherwise agreed in writing,and subject to their consent,all personnel to be compensated for working on the Project shall be an independent contractor of the Project. 8.Governance:Authority to manage the programmatic activities of the Project is the responsibility Town of Fraser. 9.Fundraising/Sponsor’s Duties:The Project may solicit gifts,contributions,and grants on behalf of the Project,but not on behalf of the Sponsor.All solicitations by whatever means shall be communicated to the Sponsor’s Executive Director.The Sponsor shall be responsible for the processing and acknowledgment of all monies received for the project,which shall be reported as the income of the Sponsor for both tax purposes and for purposes of the Sponsor’s financial statements.Grants involving government or public agency monies have substantial reporting and auditing requirements;therefore,if the Project desires to apply for government or public agency grants, the Project must get advance approval to do so from the Sponsor’s Executive Director. 10.Renewal of this MOU:The MOU may be renewed upon mutual consent by the Sponsor and The Project and must be made in writing. 11.Termination:Either party may terminate this MOU by giving 30 days’written notice to the other party.When a Successor (a replacement Fiscal Sponsor)is found,the balance of assets held by the Sponsor for the Project,together with any other assets held or liabilities incurred by the Sponsor in connection with the Project,shall be transferred to the Successor at the end of the notice period or any extension thereof,subject to the approval of any third parties (including funding sources)that may be required. 12. Compensation: The fiscal agent will not charge a fee for this service. This MOU will remain in force until the stated end of the project on December 31,2024 or it is terminated with 30 days written notice by either the Sponsor or the Project,whichever date is sooner. Final accounting to the Project and Sponsor is due within 30 days of completion of this MOU. By signing below,both parties agree to execute this Agreement on the day and year first written above. The Sponsor (Grand Foundation) By: _______________________________ ___________________ Executive Director Date The Project Town of Fraser By: ________________________________ __________________ Town Manager Date 1 Town of Fraser Resolution No. 2024-01-05 A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO PARTICIPATION BY THE FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP IN THE COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK SHARING AGENCY WHEREAS, the Town of FRASER is a member of the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA), a public entity self-insurance pool providing property/casualty coverage, workers’ compensation coverage, or both, to its members; and WHEREAS, the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP is a public entity as said term is defined in C.R.S. Section 24-10-103.5 (other than the state, a county, a city and county, or a school district); and WHEREAS, the Town has in effect with the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP an intergovernmental agreement for the provision of one or more functions, services, or facilities lawfully authorized to both the Town and the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP; and WHEREAS, the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP has made application for membership in CIRSA; and WHEREAS, the Town desires to consent to the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP’s participation in CIRSA; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO: Section 1. The Board of Trustees hereby consents to participation by the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP in CIRSA. Section 2. A copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the FRASER RIVER VALLEY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP and to CIRSA. DULY MOVED, SECONDED, AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY 2024. Votes in favor: ___BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk Economical Benefits of Historic Preservations An Overview of Historic Preservation Tax Credits Overview of HPTC The Preservation of Commercial Historic Structures Program (otherwise known as HPTC or the Historic Preservation Tax Credit) encourages the rehabilitation of historic commercial structures to support economic revitalization as authorized under C.R.S. 39-22-514.5. The credit is a Colorado income tax credit.This is an economic development program. The goal is to preserve Colorado’s historic structures and to support economic vitality. The program is assessed on its impact on job creation, quality wages, investment, and tax revenue. Available Funding The program is allocated $10 million in tax credits each calendar year that may be reserved for qualified projects on a first come, first served basis. • $5,000,000 is available for “small” projects where qualified rehabilitation expenses (QRE) are less than $2,000,000 • $5,000,000 is available for “large” projects where QRE are $2,000,000 and greater Eligibility ●Property Control ○Owner ○Tenant of five years in a rural area ●Commercial Use ○Must produce income ●Historic Preservation ○Must be at least 50 years old ○Must be a certified historic structure at the Local, State, or Federal level ○Must meet the Standards for Rehabilitation of the US Secretary of the Interior. ●Timeliness ○Application must be submitted within 120 days from the project’s end-date What that looks like… Rural Areas are eligible for 35% of qualifying costs. For example -the roof at Cozens Ranch, a $86,000 project. $30,100 in tax credits were applied for. As a 501c3, we will then sell our tax credits for .80 -.99 cents on the dollar. Historic Preservation in Grand County Gaining Historic Designation is a barrier to utilizing the HPTC in Grand County. At this time, the only option is to pursue designation through State Historical Fund and History Colorado. This process is overwhelming to most property owners. Another option is the reexamination of the Grand County Historic Preservation Board. Today we would like to explore the opportunity to reinstate a board so that we are able to take advantage of these HPTC funds. Grand County Historic Preservation Board Was disbanded in 2010 and Certified Local Government designation was relinquished. Did not include an IGA with towns (where most historic buildings reside) GCHA is working to reinstate this board on a county level. A local GCHPB allows Grand County to decide what is of historical significance. Historic designation will open the doors to programs that encourage preservation through economic development. Thank you! MEMO TO:Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM:Paul Johnson, Director of Public Works DATE:January 3, 2024 SUBJECT:Water and Sewer Rate Increase MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Discussion of the Rate Study completed by Raftelis and the three scenarios presented in the study to determine the appropriate increase in water and sewer rates. BACKGROUND: Based on the Water System 10-year Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the Board of Trustees on May 3, 2023, a Utility Rate Study was authorized to determine if any rate increases are needed to properly fund the Water System 10-year Capital Improvement Plan projects. The Board of Trustees last changed the water and sewer utility rates with Resolution 2019-02- 01 which set the current Town rates and modified the rates previously set in 2016. Current rates are listed below: a.The Water Base Rate shall be $153.00 per quarter per Single Family Equivalent (SFE), billed quarterly. b.The Water Consumption Rate for commercial/mixed-use uses remains as: 1.Tier 1 - $1.50 per 1,000 gallons 2.Tier 2 - $1.50 per 1,000 gallons 3.Tier 3 - $1.50 per 1,000 gallons c.The Water Consumption Rate for residential uses shall be as follows per SFE per quarter: 1.Tier 1 - $1.50 per 1,000 gallons for 0 to 12,000 gallons 2.Tier 2 - $3.00 per 1,000 gallons for 12,001 to 20,000 gallons 3.Tier 3 - $6.00 per 1,000 gallons for anything over 20,000 gallons RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Scenario #2 as it funds a minimum of 75% of the required Capital Improvement Projects if unsuccessful in grant awards and does not require the Town to take on debt. Sewer quarterly rates would increase by the studies sole recommendation. APPENDIXES: Raftelis Rate Study PowerPoint presentation: Fraser Board Rate PPT 101823.pdf Water System 10-year Capital Improvement Plan.pdf Granby North Service Area Water – 2024 Rates & Fees.pdf Granby South Service Area Water – 2024 Rates & Fees.pdf Winter Park Ranch Schedule of Water and Sewer Tap Fees and Charges.pdf Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 1 Town of Fraser Water and Sewer Rate and Fee Study October 18, 2023 2 Agenda Tap fees Study goals and objectives Financial plan process Proposed rates Conclusions and next steps Financial plan scenarios Peer rate survey 1 2 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Water and sewer bills continue to rise nationwide 3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16 '18 '20 '22 CP I F a c t o r Inflationary Increases in Consumer Utility Bills (1984 – 2023) Consumer Price Index CPI (Inflation)Electrict Gas Trash Water Electric Water and Sewer CPI Gas Solid Waste 4 The Town’s rates and fees must: 3 4 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 5 How we’ll get there Rate study process 6 Financial Plan Rate Design Tap Fees How much money do we need? 2 3 How can our rates help ensure fairness? How to recover growth-related costs? 1 5 6 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Guided by industry-standard financial planning and rate-setting approaches 7 American Water Works Association, Manual M-1, Principles of Rates, Fees, and Charges Water Environment Federation Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems Raftelis Financial Consultants Water and Wastewater Finance and Pricing 8 Financial Plan 7 8 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 9 • Rate revenues • Other operating revenue • Loan proceeds • Tap fees Revenues and Other Sources • Operating expenses • Growth capital projects • R&R capital projects • Debt service Expenditures • Reserve levels • Coverage ratios Financial Policies Multi-Year Financial Plan Financial planning process What is the revenue required to meet expenditures? Financial planning cash flow structure 10 • Rate revenues • Miscellaneous operating revenues • O&M expenses • Repair and replacement capital • Transfers TO Capital Fund Utility Enterprise Capital Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow • Tap fees • Grants • Transfers FROM Operating cash flow • Future bonds and loans • Growth-related capital projects • Existing and proposed growth-related debt service 9 10 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 11 Water Financial Plan Water utility financial plan assumptions 12 Reserve Targets And Debt Service Coverage (DSC) • O&M: 4% General, 5% Utilities, 6% Chemicals • Capital: 5%Inflation factors • Fund operations using rate revenues and reserves • Maintain debt service coverage and reserve levels • Minimize rate shock through uniform rate increases Rate Revenue Adjustment Strategy $500k + 25% value of NBV assets• Committed $271,025• Strategic 120 days O&M expense• O&M 1.2x debt service payment•DSC Alternate Targets • Depreciation 1 year depreciation expense • O&M 60 days O&M expense 11 12 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Capital expenditures projected to increase over the next 10 years 13 Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements Future water capital projects 14 13 14 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 15 Water capital improvement program $ millions Water utility cash flow scenarios 16 Full Fund CIP Fully Fund CIP Partially Fund CIP Tap fees and rate revenue 2 3 1 Tap fees, loans, grants, and rate revenue *Each project will be funded with 25% grants Tap fees, loans, grants, rate revenues with capped annual increases 15 16 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Water financial plan scenario comparison Bill impacts: Typical residential quarterly bill (12,000 gal) 17 $171.00 $273.60 $702.95 $242.82 $558.31 $196.65 $286.30 $150 $250 $350 $450 $550 $650 $750 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Qu a r t e r l y B i l l Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Capital expenditures and funding sources Scenario 1– Cash Funding Growth-Related Capital $11.9 Annual R&R Capital $23.7 Developer Reimbursements $2.5 Tap Fees $3.9 Rate Revenues $34.3 $38.1 $38.1 Capital Expenditures Funding Sources 18 $ millions 17 18 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Water operating cash flow Scenario 1 – Cash Funding 19 •Rate Revenues •Other income and •O&M expense •Transfers •Rate Revenues •Other income and •O&M expense •Transfers •Ending Balance and •Target Reserves •Ending Balance and •Target Reserves Capital expenditures and funding sources Scenario 2 – Grant Funding Growth-Related Capital $11.9 Annual R&R Capital $23.7 Developer Reimbursements $2.5 Tap Fees $3.9 Grant Proceeds, $8.6 Rate Revenues $25.7 $38.1 $38.1 Capital Expenditures Funding Sources 21 $ millions 19 21 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Water operating cash flow Scenario 2 – Grant Funding 22 •Rate Revenues •Other income and •O&M expense •Transfers •Rate Revenues •Other income and •O&M expense •Transfers •Ending Balance and •Target Reserves •Ending Balance and •Target Reserves Capital expenditures and funding sources Scenario 3 – Grant Funding and Loans Growth-Related Capital $11.9 Annual R&R Capital $23.7 Debt Service $5.8 Developer Reimbursements $2.5 Tap Fees $3.9 Loans $21.4 Grant Proceeds, $8.6 Rate Revenues $10.1 $44.0 $44.0 Capital Expenditures Funding Sources $ millions 23 22 23 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Water operating cash flow Scenario 3 – Grant Funding and Loans 24 •Rate Revenues •Other income and •O&M expense •Transfers •Rate Revenues •Other income and •O&M expense •Transfers •Ending Balance and •Target Reserves •Ending Balance and •Target Reserves 25 Sewer Financial Plan 24 25 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Sewer financial plan assumptions 26 Reserve Targets • O&M: 4% General, 5% Utilities, 6% Chemicals • Capital: 5%Inflation factors • Fund operations using rate revenues and reserves • Maintain debt service coverage and reserve levels • Minimize rate shock through uniform rate increases Rate Revenue Adjustment Strategy • Scenario 1: Annual increases of 8% from 2024-2032Operating Fund Scenarios $500k + 25% value of NBV assets• Committed $2.06 million• Strategic $1.0 million• JFF 120 days O&M expense• O&M Capital expenditures and funding sources Annual R&R Capital 11.5 Growth Related $2.7 Reserves $7.1 Tap Fees $3.8 Grant Proceeds $3.3 $14.2 $14.2 Capital Expenditures Funding Sources 27 26 27 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Sewer operating cash flow Includes proposed revenue increases 28 •Rate revenues •Tap fees •Other income and •O&M expense •Capital costs •Rate revenues •Tap fees •Other income and •O&M expense •Capital costs Ending balance and Target reserves Ending balance and Target reserves 29 Rate Design 28 29 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Town’s current water rate structure All customers billed quarterly 30 AmountResidential $153.00Base Rate, $ per EQR Consumption Rates $1.50Tier 1 $3.00Tier 2 $6.00Tier 3 AmountCommercial/Mixed Use $153.00Base Rate $1.50Consumption Rates Current and proposed 2024 water rates By scenario All customers billed quarterly 31 2024 Scenario 3 2024 Scenario 2 2024 Scenario 1 2023Residential $175.95$217.26$244.80$153.00Base Rate, $ per EQR Consumption Rates $1.73$2.13$2.40$1.50Tier 1 $3.45$4.26$4.80$3.00Tier 2 $6.90$8.52$8.52$6.00Tier 3 2024 Scenario 3 2024 Scenario 2 2024 Scenario 1 2023Commercial/Mixed Use $175.95$217.26$244.80$153.00Base Rate $1.73$2.13$2.40$1.50Consumption Rates 30 31 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Town’s current sewer rate structure All customers billed quarterly 32 20242023All Customers $148.50$137.50Base Rate Peer utility residential typical water and wastewater bill survey (quarterly basis) 34 RESIDENTIAL ¾” Meter (1 SFE) 12,000 per quarter 4,000 gallons per month 32 34 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only 35 Tap Fees Tap fees defined 36 •Governed by Colorado Revised Statute 20-20-104.5 •Legislatively adopted •Governed by Colorado Revised Statute 20-20-104.5 •Legislatively adopted •Intended to defray the projected impacts on capital facilities caused by development •Intended to defray the projected impacts on capital facilities caused by development •Local government to quantify to the proposed impacts of proposed development •Local government to quantify to the proposed impacts of proposed development •Local government to establish fee at a level no greater than necessary to defray the impact related to development •Local government to establish fee at a level no greater than necessary to defray the impact related to development 35 36 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Tap fees defined continued 37 •One-time fee for capacity to serve new development •Incremental fee for increased in capacity •One-time fee for capacity to serve new development •Incremental fee for increased in capacity •Fee based on the value of utility’s capacity and the amount of capacity needed by new development •Fee based on the value of utility’s capacity and the amount of capacity needed by new development •Fee represents cost to reserve capacity in backbone facilities such as treatment plants, transmission mains, treated storage, etc. •Fee represents cost to reserve capacity in backbone facilities such as treatment plants, transmission mains, treated storage, etc. •Fee balances equity between new and existing customers•Fee balances equity between new and existing customers Water and wastewater tap fees No proposed changes 38 Amount per SFEDescription $7,700Water Tap Fee $7,500Wastewater Tap Fee 37 38 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Peer utility tap fee survey, 1 SFE 39 Conclusions and considerations 40 •The water and sewer master plans identify several near-term priority 1 projects required to maintain level of service •The water and sewer master plans identify several near-term priority 1 projects required to maintain level of service •Rate increases are required to maintain the water and sewer utilities financial health and level of service •Rate increases are required to maintain the water and sewer utilities financial health and level of service •Decision point: Determining the appropriate balance of debt financing and rate revenues to fund capital projects •Decision point: Determining the appropriate balance of debt financing and rate revenues to fund capital projects •Decision point: Reliance on grants to fund capital projects•Decision point: Reliance on grants to fund capital projects 39 40 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only Contact:Todd Cristiano 303 305 1138 / tcristiano@raftelis.com 41 Thank you! 41 10-YEAR WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN REPORT TOWN OF FRASER May 2023 Prepared by Merrick and Company Adopted May 17, 2023 Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This 10-Year Water Capital Improvements Projects Report for the Town of Fraser analyzed the existing water infrastructure of the Town related to water supply and the distribution system. Demand projections for the next 10-years were made based on future development in the Town. Development in the Town is bringing significant demand increases and stress to the existing water system. Based on the estimated demand projections and analysis of the existing system, capital improvement projects (CIP) are recommended to continue to provide high quality water service to the Town. Based on the analysis it appears that many of the assets in the Town are past their industry standard useful life and should be scheduled for replacement. This CIP represents a data-driven analysis for the Town to utilize in addressing water infrastructure needs. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Population ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Summary of Water Rights ............................................................................................................. 3 2 Water System Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 4 2.1 North Well Field Water Supply and Treatment ............................................................................ 7 2.2 North Water Treatment Plant ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Future Surface Water Treatment Plant .............................................................................. 10 2.3 North System Storage and Distribution ...................................................................................... 10 2.3.1 North System Storage Tanks ............................................................................................... 12 2.4 South Well Field Water Supply and Treatment .......................................................................... 13 2.5 South Water Treatment Plant ..................................................................................................... 15 2.6 South System Storage and Distribution ...................................................................................... 15 2.6.1 South System Storage Tanks ............................................................................................... 17 2.7 Condition and Status of Existing Water Infrastructure Assets .................................................... 18 3 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Indoor Demands.......................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Existing Demand Data and Land Use Schedules ......................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Existing Water Demand ...................................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Land Use Schedules ............................................................................................................. 21 4 Future Projections ........................................................................................................................... 22 4.1 Future Buildout Areas ................................................................................................................. 22 4.2 Demand Projections .................................................................................................................... 23 5 Capital Improvement Plan .............................................................................................................. 26 5.1 2023 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 2024 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 31 5.3 2025 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 32 5.4 2026 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 32 5.5 2027 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 33 5.6 2028 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 33 Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report iii 5.7 2029 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 34 5.8 2030 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 34 5.9 2031 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 35 5.10 2032 CIP ...................................................................................................................................... 35 Appendices Appendix A – Reference Material Appendix B – Asset Database, Unconstrained Model, Constrained Model List of Tables Table 1 - North System Storage Requirements ........................................................................................... 12 Table 2 - South System Storage Requirements ........................................................................................... 17 Table 3 – Single-Family, Mixed-Use Residential, and Commercial SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser)............ 19 Table 4 – Multi-Family Residential SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser) ............................................................ 20 Table 5 - Annual Water Delivered and Nonrevenue Water, 2017-2021 .................................................... 20 Table 6 – Fraser 10-Year SFE/EQR Projections............................................................................................ 23 Table 7 – Fraser 10-Year Demand Projections ............................................................................................ 25 Table 8 - Fraser Well Field Capacity ............................................................................................................ 25 Table 9 - Capital Improvement Projects ..................................................................................................... 27 List of Figures Figure 1 – Town of Fraser population, historic and 10-year projection [U.S. Census Bureau] ..................... 2 Figure 2 – Pressure Zone Map ...................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 – Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) Diagram ........................................................................................... 6 Figure 4 – North Well Field ........................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 5 – NTP Average Monthly Production (2019-2021) ........................................................................... 9 Figure 6 – North Distribution System ......................................................................................................... 11 Figure 7 – STP Average Monthly Production (2019-2021) .......................................................................... 13 Figure 8 – South Well Field ......................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 9 – South Distribution System ......................................................................................................... 16 Figure 10 - Unconstrained Model ............................................................................................................... 29 Figure 11 - Constrained Model ................................................................................................................... 30 Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report iv List of Abbreviations ADD Average Day Demand AF Acre-feet AF/yr Acre-feet per year AMI Automated metering infrastructure bgs Below ground surface cfs Cubic feet per second CWCB Colorado Water Conservation Board EQR Equivalent Residential Unit gpcd Gallons per capita per day gpm Gallons per minute MDD Maximum Day Demand MG Million gallons MGD Million gallons per day msl Mean sea level PHD Peak Hour Demand PFAS SFE Town Polyfluoroalkyl substances Single Family Equivalent Town of Fraser Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 1 Project Number 65421166 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide the Town of Fraser (Town) a 10-Year Water Capital Improvements Project (10-Year CIP) Report. The main objectives of this 10-Year Water CIP are as follows: Summarize water supply system needs for the Town of Fraser based on the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) and bundle items into CIPs as needed. Identify existing water infrastructure that, according to industry standard useful life, needs repair or replacement and bundle into CIPs as needed; and Work with Town Leadership to identify the highest priority projects with associated costs and assign a proposed timeline for implementation. The 10-Year Water CIP project was identified by the Town as critical due to ongoing concerns, which particularly include the following: future supply needs, adequate water supply and distribution infrastructure for future growth, and ongoing operations and maintenance issues. Please note that a detailed examination of water rights is outside the scope of this project. For additional information regarding the Town’s water rights, refer to the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) included in Appendix A. 1.2 Background The Town’s municipal water supply facilities are comprised of two independent systems: (1) the North System, which generally supplies geographic areas of the Town known as Old Town Fraser, and the Byers Peak Properties development; and (2) the South System which supplies areas of the Town encompassing the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments. Both systems operate with their own raw water supply well fields, water treatment plants, and distribution infrastructure. However, there is a physical water main connection along Old Victory Rd. that, through operation of pressure reducing valves, can allow for water exchanges in the event of emergencies (wildfires, etc.). At this time, majority of development is within the original boundaries of the Town and has been well established for some time. Fraser is primarily a residential town with a year-round population as well as seasonal population of second homeowners, visitors, and tourists. The Town is comprised of residential homes, both single and multi-family, townhome complexes and commercial areas. Public facilities include the Town Hall, the public library, a sports complex, grade school, and fire district. The Town also has 120 acres of open space along the Fraser River and Cozens Ranch Open Space. Future development includes housing for the growing population, new commercial development, and redevelopment of various properties throughout the Town. Both year-round and seasonal populations are expected to increase in coming years. Several areas of Rendezvous have been developed on the east side of Highway 40; currently the development mix is mostly single-family homes. In the future, development in Rendezvous will include both single family and multi-family homes to provide for an economically diverse community. There are also plans for hotels to accommodate seasonal visitors to the Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 2 Project Number 65421166 area, both for the winter ski season and for summer outdoor activities. A small commercial area is planned to serve the needs of the people living nearby as well as some designated open space areas. Grand Park development plans include housing for the anticipated growing population, both full-time and seasonal residents. Like Rendezvous, there will be both single and multi-family homes, as well as hotel lodging. It is anticipated that there will be a small commercial and retail area and the possibility of a golf course in the Grand Park area. 1.3 Population According to the U.S. Census, by 2000 Fraser had a population of 910 in the Town, the largest ever, and an increase of 58.3% from ten years prior. In following Census years, growth has remained steady increasing to a population of 1,224 in 2010 (3.5% growth annually) and 1,400 in 2020 (1.4% growth annually). Refer to Figure 1 below for a graphical representation of population growth. The Colorado State Demography Office forecasts future population trends for each county within the state through the year 2050. During that time, the population of Grand County is expected to increase by an average of 1.03% per year. Based on an average population growth of 1.03% per year for Grand County, the projected population for the Town in the year 2032 is 1,584. Because of the expected, steady population increase, the Town is carefully planning for the influx of both full-time and seasonal residents moving to the area. Due to its mountain location, the Town experiences seasonal population fluctuations. The main draw for visitors in the winter is the nearby Winter Park Ski Resort. Generally, the ski resort is open from mid- November through mid-April. The peak of the ski season in February and March brings many tourists to the area. Because the Town is close by, many people find accommodations there, causing a peak seasonal population during this time. Summer also draws visitors to the area for other recreational activities such as mountain biking, fishing, and hiking. To maintain and serve these seasonal population fluctuations, as well as support the year-round community members, the Town carefully plans for accommodations and services, including potable water. Figure 1 – Town of Fraser population, historic and 10-year projection [U.S. Census Bureau] Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 3 Project Number 65421166 1.4 Summary of Water Rights The following paragraphs are taken from Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) to provide a summary of existing water rights. The Town of Fraser’s North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the “Fraser Wells”) with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. The total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed a pumping rate of 2.28 cubic feet per second (cfs). Pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town and are “exchange to” structures for the Town’s decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out-of-priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. The Town of Fraser’s South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed, and currently includes four active wells (Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 7) with 1999 appropriation dates. These wells supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. The wells are included in the Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation ("Maryvale Augmentation Plan") which was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties (up to 2,822 equivalent residential units ("EQRs") and irrigate 17 acres). The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the Cozens Ditch water right, which was changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage from the Maryvale Reservoir or Grand Park Ponds. Refer to the Existing Conditions section of this report for additional information regarding the EQRs for the South System (HRS Water Consultants, Inc., August 12, 2022). The north area of the Grand Park development, which includes a total of 184 EQRs, is currently served by the blue pressure zone of the North System. This area is intended to be transitioned to the South System to be served under the Fraser-Maryvale water rights. It is understood that projects to advance the transition of the 184 EQRs in Grand Park from the North System to the South System are a high priority as well as developing the Town’s St. Louis Creek water rights as a source of non-potable water supply. The Town also owns surface water rights on the St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension Ditch and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. These ditches are decreed for irrigation purposes. Additionally, the Town owns reservoir water storage capacity for replacement and exchange purposes in reservoirs located at Fraser, Grand County Water and Sanitation District Reservoir No. 2, and at other downstream reservoirs (HRS Water Consultants, Inc., August 12, 2022). The Town of Fraser has undertaken no significant water rights projects since the Water Supply Master Plan was completed in 2008 (Brown and Caldwell, January 18, 2008). For this effort, when evaluating water CIPs, and with confirmation from the Town, the same projects recommended in 2008 are still relevant today. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 4 Project Number 65421166 2 WATER SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE This section summarizes the existing infrastructure and facilities currently in use for supply, treatment, and distribution of the Town’s potable water system. For clarification purposes the following designations for the two water systems operated by the Town will be used throughout: 1) North System - The water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities within the original boundaries of the Town (also referred to as the Fraser System), and 2) South System - The water supply, treatment, and distribution facilities within the Rendezvous and Grand Park portions of Town (also referred to as the Fraser-Maryvale System). As indicated in Section 1 - Introduction, the systems operate independently with their own raw water supply well fields, water treatment plants, and distribution infrastructure. In the event of water emergencies, including wildfires, there is a physical water main connection along Old Victory Rd. that, through operation of pressure reducing valves, could allow for water exchanges. The Town of Fraser’s Design Criteria and Construction Standards (2021) identifies important information about the water system. The combined water system consists of five pressure zones, water supply wells, booster pump stations, water treatment facilities and water storage tanks. The five pressure zones and the elevations of their respective service areas are described as follows: Blue Pressure Zone (8,600 to 8,680 ft above mean sea level (msl)) Yellow Pressure Zone (8,680 to 8,860 ft msl) Green Pressure Zone (8,860 to 9,080 ft msl) Red Pressure Zone (9,080 to 9,300 ft msl) Purple Pressure Zone (9,300 to 9,460 ft msl) Figure 2 shows a map of the Town’s existing pressure zones. The blue, yellow, green, and red zones are shown on the figure. The purple zone has been proposed for future development, but it is not yet shown on the figure. Figure 3 shows the Town’s existing system in terms of hydraulic grade. The diagram is called a Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) and depicts water assets according to their elevation. The HGL diagram is useful for showing how the water assets are related and connected. When new assets, such as water storage tanks, are installed, this diagram is helpful to show elevations and relationships within pressure zones to sustain fill and drain rates for water storage tanks. The diagram is a living document that should be updated when new assets are added or when updated survey information is obtained. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 5 Project Number 65421166 Figure 2 – Pressure Zone Map Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 6 Project Number 65421166 Figure 3 – Hydraulic Grade Line (HGL) Diagram Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 7 Project Number 65421166 As shown on Figure 3, three existing water storage tanks and a series of pumps provide the water pressure necessary to operate the systems. The Blue Zone tank is a 1 MG underground, concrete storage tank located at the northeast corner of Town. The overflow of the Blue Zone tank is at elevation 8,795 ft msl (NGVD 29 Datum) (Town of Fraser, 2021). The Yellow Zone tank is located within the Rendezvous Development on the east side of Highway 40. It currently serves portions of development on East Mountain (Rendezvous) and West Mountain (Grand Park), with US Hwy 40 being the division line. The existing Yellow Zone tank is a 0.3 MG underground, post-tensioned concrete tank with an overflow elevation of 8,964.2 ft msl (NGVD 29 Datum). The Green Zone tank is located within the Rendezvous Development on the east side of Highway 40. It currently serves a portion of the development on East Mountain (Rendezvous). The existing Green Zone tank is a 0.5 MG underground, prestressed concrete tank with an overflow at elevation 9,174 ft msl (NGVD 29 Datum). The Red Pressure Zone within Rendezvous is served by booster pumps at the Green Zone tank location. Water storage tanks are planned for the Grand Park area (also called West Mountain) and does not yet exist. The intent would be to develop and install water storage tanks in advance of the development to meet flow, pressure, and fire flow requirements. The intent would be to install water storage tanks at lower elevations and pump up to water storage tanks at the higher elevations. It is anticipated that yellow, red, and purple zones will be required in the Grand Park development. It is anticipated that the developer would pay for additional water storage tanks. The existing Yellow and Green Zones are connected by booster pumps for lifting water from the Yellow Zone to the Green Zone and by two pressure reducing valves (PRVs). The PRV will operate if a low-pressure level is recorded in the lower distribution system. In the event of a fire in the Yellow Zone, the water stored in the Green Zone tank is available for fire flow requirements (Ord. 389 Part 1.1., 2012). 2.1 North Well Field Water Supply and Treatment The following well information can be found in the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020). The North Well Field is an alluvial well field that consists of seven production wells (Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(b), 5, 7, 8, and 9) drilled to various depths within the aquifer. The raw water is pumped to a common clearwell at the North Treatment Plant (NTP) where it is metered and treated prior to distribution. The North Well Field spans the majority of the original Town limits, with wells focused along the east and west sides of the Fraser River. Snowmelt is the primary source of recharge to the aquifer. Due to the shallow nature of the alluvium, the well field could be susceptible to the influence of surface water, which would require advanced water treatment processes, mainly filtration. Well No. 9 is notably the shallowest well with a screened interval between 26’ and 48’ below ground surface (bgs). Figure 4 provides an overview of the North System well field and major infrastructure components associated with the system (HRS Water Consultants, Inc., 2020). Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 8 Project Number 65421166 Figure 4 – North Well Field Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 9 Project Number 65421166 The North Well Field wells were completed in the 1980s to various depths ranging from approximately 47 to 177 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the Fraser River Alluvium. Currently Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3b, 5, and 8 are on-line and are meeting the water supply needs of Town. The two wells that are not online are Well No. 7, which requires maintenance, and Well No. 9, which is out temporarily due to State Mandated Per- and Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) monitoring. Town staff anticipate Well No. 7 will be brought on-line in 2023. Wells 3a and 4 are low-producing and are not used. Currently all the wells are metered individually, and they have recently been equipped with pressure transducers to collect drawdown data. The North Well Field wells operate in response to lowered water levels in the Blue Zone Tank. Due to low well production, the Town maintains a minimum amount of drawdown in the Blue Zone tank to have sufficient storage for peak demands and fire flows. The wells are run on single speed pumps for an average of 10-14 hours per day to meet Town demand. Production data for the NTP System was available for years 2019 to 2021. Average monthly production data were calculated, showing the seasonal variations in water demand in the Town, shown in Figure 5. The highest water production data occurs during the summer irrigation months. Figure 5 – NTP Average Monthly Production (2019-2021) Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 10 Project Number 65421166 2.2 North Water Treatment Plant The current water treatment facility was constructed in 1996 to provide a common point of disinfection before storage in the Blue Zone concrete storage tank. Groundwater from the North Well Field flows through supply lines to a common pipeline at the clearwell facility. Production from the wells is measured through a magnetic flowmeter which records instantaneous and total gallons pumped from the well field. Groundwater is disinfected with liquid chlorine in the clearwell via a peristaltic pump to maintain a chlorine residual of 0.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) at the clearwell discharge point. The clearwell has a serpentine baffling pattern to ensure sufficient chlorine contact time. The clearwell volume at a depth of 10 feet is approximately 22,200 gallons. After chlorination the water is conditioned with soda ash for stabilization and aerated for radon treatment as necessary. 2.2.1 Future Surface Water Treatment Plant As part of the Fraser Firming Project Study prepared in 2015, by JRS Engineering and HRS Consultants, a new surface water treatment plant has been identified as a potential improvement to the North System. The firming study identified two options for the treatment facility; 1) Facility located at Gold Medal Ranch near Gaskill Ditch Headgate, 2) Facility located at the existing Blue Zone facility. If the facility were to be located at the existing Blue Zone facility, it would require roughly 9,400 linear feet of raw water transmission main to be installed. For this CIP the most expensive option was assumed. This Surface Water Treatment Plant is proposed as a capital improvement project in Section - 5 later in the document. This treatment plant would be a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights for St. Louis Creek. 2.3 North System Storage and Distribution After treatment at the NTP, the water is pumped to a one million gallon (MG) underground concrete storage tank for storage and distribution. The clearwell building houses two booster pumps, one duty and one standby, necessary for lifting the water from the clearwell to the storage tank. The concrete storage tank was built in 1986 and provides storage and pressure required for distribution throughout the Blue pressure zone. The distribution system consists of a single zone (Blue Zone) with no additional booster stations. The treatment and distribution system are monitored with a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. The SCADA system allows the operator to view the status of the system and alarms including chlorine residual, tank levels, power failure, and security of the clearwell building. Groundwater flow rate from the well field is controlled by the receiving tank level which is monitored by the SCADA system. The SCADA system controls the automatic start-up and shutdown of the groundwater well pumps based on tiered flow increments. Figure 6 provides an overview of the North Distribution System and major infrastructure components associated with the system. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 11 Project Number 65421166 Figure 6 – North Distribution System Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 12 Project Number 65421166 2.3.1 North System Storage Tanks The North System currently has one storage tank in the Blue Zone with 1 MG capacity. Storage tanks must be sized to meet domestic demands and fire flow demands per CDPHE. The following assumptions have been made and are consistent with the 2008 Water Supply Master Plan and East Grand County Fire Protection District Code: Maximum Day Demand (MDD) calculated as 1.5 times the Average Day Demand (ADD) Fire Flow Demand assumed to be 3,000 gpm for three hours (540,000 gallons) Operational Volume assumed to be 30% of MDD Required Storage is a total of these three: MDD, Fire Flow and Operational Volume The required storage was analyzed with the anticipated growth and development. The future development (SFEs) in the Town of Fraser is projected in Section 4 below. Future Average Day Demands are calculated based on 300 gpd per SFE and described in Section 4 below. The required storage and storage provided are compared with surplus or deficit in storage volume listed. Based on these calculations it appears there is currently insufficient capacity in the North System Blue Zone. It is anticipated that the Byers Peak Ranch development, in the Blue Zone, will require its own storage tank. Hydraulic modeling is recommended to confirm sufficient fire flow is available while meeting minimum required pressures of 20 pounds per square inch (psi) at all other points in the system. See Table 1 for North System Storage Requirements. Table 1 - North System Storage Requirements North System Year ADD MDD Fire Flow Operational Volume Required Storage Storage Provided Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons 2022 292,500 438,750 540,000 131,625 1,110,375 1,000,000 (110,375) 2023 378,630 567,945 540,000 170,384 1,278,329 1,000,000 (278,329) 2024 464,760 697,140 540,000 209,142 1,446,282 1,000,000 (446,282) 2025 499,440 749,160 540,000 224,748 1,513,909 1,000,000 (513,909) 2026 527,120 790,681 540,000 237,204 1,567,885 1,000,000 (567,885) 2027 554,801 832,201 540,000 249,660 1,621,861 1,000,000 (621,861) 2028 582,481 873,721 540,000 262,116 1,675,837 1,000,000 (675,837) 2029 610,161 915,241 540,000 274,572 1,729,813 1,000,000 (729,813) 2030 637,841 956,761 540,000 287,028 1,783,790 1,000,000 (783,790) 2031 665,521 998,281 540,000 299,484 1,837,766 1,000,000 (837,766) 2032 693,201 1,039,802 540,000 311,940 1,891,742 1,000,000 (891,742) Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 13 Project Number 65421166 2.4 South Well Field Water Supply and Treatment The following well information can be found in the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020). The South Well Field is comprised of four Troublesome Formation bedrock wells, Maryvale Well Nos. E1 through E4, and referred to by the State Engineer as Well No. 1. (E4), Well No. 4 (E3), Well No. 5 (El), and Well No. 7 (E2). The wells were completed in the Troublesome Formation between 2000 and 2001, and the raw water is pumped to a common clearwell at the South Water Treatment Plant (STP). The Large Capacity Wells are tributary to the Fraser River and its tributaries. Figure 8 provides an overview of the South Well Field and major infrastructure components associated with the system. The current South Well Field is located on the east side of Highway 40. The principal production zones are generally 30 to 35 feet in thickness overlain by 30 to 40 feet of Troublesome Bedrock (Resource Engineering, May 2001), and total depths range from 200 to 280 feet bgs. The Troublesome Formation in this area is an aquitard that separates the Fraser River Alluvium from the underlying Troublesome Bedrock. This layer is leaky which allows some vertical percolation from the Fraser River Alluvium to the Troublesome and is likely a major source of recharge to the well field. Currently all the wells are metered individually, and they have recently been equipped with pressure transducers to collect drawdown data. The South Well Field is operated in a similar fashion to the North Well Field. Each of the four wells are turned on when the STP clearwell calls for water based on a call from one of the South System storage tanks. Future demands from both the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments will require additional wells to be drilled. Production data for the South System was available for years 2019 to 2021. Average monthly production data were calculated, showing the seasonal variations in water demand in the Town, shown in Figure 7. The highest water production data occurs during the summer irrigation months. Figure 7 – STP Average Monthly Production (2019-2021) Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 14 Project Number 65421166 Figure 8 – South Well Field Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 15 Project Number 65421166 2.5 South Water Treatment Plant Groundwater from the South Well Field flows through supply lines to a common pipeline at the clearwell facility. Water pumped from the South wells is piped to the STP. The current water treatment facility was constructed in 2003 by the Town to provide a common point of disinfection before pumping water to the Green and Yellow Zone storage tanks. Production from the wells is measured through a magnetic flowmeter which records instantaneous and total gallons pumped from the well field. Groundwater is disinfected with liquid chlorine in the clearwell via a peristaltic pump to maintain a chlorine residual of 0.5 mg/L at the clearwell discharge point. The clearwell has as serpentine baffling pattern for sufficient chlorine contact time. The clearwell volume at a depth of 10 feet is approximately 27,270 gallons. After chlorination the water is conditioned with soda ash for stabilization and aerated for radon treatment as necessary. 2.6 South System Storage and Distribution After treatment at the STP, the water is pumped into the Yellow Zone. The clearwell building houses two booster pumps, one duty and one standby pump, necessary for lifting the water from the clearwell to the Yellow Zone tank and the Green Zone booster station. The Green Zone booster station houses two booster pumps, one duty and one standby pump, necessary for lifting the water from the Yellow Zone to the Green Zone tank and the Red Zone. Within the Green Zone, a portion of water is sent to the 0.5 MG Green Zone tank and the rest is pumped and pressurized into the Red Zone using four pumps of various sizes. The South System is broken into three zones, Yellow, Green, and Red, corresponding to specific elevations described earlier in this section. As with the North System, the South treatment and distribution systems are monitored by SCADA including chlorine residual, tank levels, power failures, and security of the clearwell building. Groundwater flow rate from the well field is controlled by the tank levels which are monitored by the SCADA system. The SCADA system controls the automatic start-up and shutdown of the groundwater well pumps based on tiered flow increments. Figure 9 provides an overview of the South Distribution System and major infrastructure components associated with the system. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 16 Project Number 65421166 Figure 9 – South Distribution System Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 17 Project Number 65421166 2.6.1 South System Storage Tanks The South System currently has two storage tanks totaling 0.8 MG capacity. Storage tanks must be sized to meet domestic demands and fire flow demands per CDPHE. The following assumptions have been made and are consistent with the 2008 Water Supply Master Plan and East Grand County Fire Protection District Code: Maximum Day Demand (MDD) calculated as 1.5 times the Average Day Demand (ADD) Fire Flow Demand assumed to be 3,000 gpm for three hours (540,000 gallons) Operational Volume assumed to be 30% of MDD Required Storage is a total of these three: MDD, Fire Flow and Operational Volume The required storage was analyzed with the anticipated growth and development. The future development (EQR) in the Town of Fraser is projected in Section 4 below. Future Average Day Demands are calculated based on 275 gpd per EQR and described in Section 4 below. The required storage and storage provided are compared and surplus or deficit in storage volume is listed. Based on these calculations it appears there is currently insufficient capacity in the South System storage tanks. It is anticipated that the Grand Park development will require at least one storage tank to provide domestic demand and fire flow to serve its development. Hydraulic modeling is recommended to confirm sufficient fire flow is available while meeting minimum required pressures of 20 psi at all other points in the pressure zone. See Table 2 for South System Storage Requirements. Table 2 - South System Storage Requirements South System Year ADD MDD Fire Flow Operational Volume Required Storage Storage Provided Surplus (+) / Deficit (-) gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons gallons 2022 232,375 348,563 540,000 104,569 993,131 800,000 (193,131) 2023 245,025 367,538 540,000 110,261 1,017,799 800,000 (217,799) 2024 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2025 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2026 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2027 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2028 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2029 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2030 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2031 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) 2032 257,675 386,513 540,000 115,954 1,042,466 800,000 (242,466) Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 18 Project Number 65421166 2.7 Condition and Status of Existing Water Infrastructure Assets Evaluating the existing water system infrastructure and assets was an important task to better understand and analyze the improvements necessary. Using information provided by the Town, an asset inventory database was compiled including assets from six major categories: Raw Water System (wells and transmission mains) Water Distribution System and PRVs (transmission mains, distribution mains, vaults, valves and piping) Master Meters and Shop (potable meters and meter pits) Pump Stations (structure, electrical, pumps, motors, and ancillary equipment) Treatment Plants (structure, electrical, pumps, associated treatment) Storage Tanks (structure and piping) The asset inventory database analyzes the installation year and replacement year given the industry standard useful life for a given asset. A significant amount of Town assets have reached the end of their useful life and should be replaced, per industry standards. The asset inventory shows the capital replacement value for the assets and the total assets for the Town of Fraser water system sum to approximately $116 million. In addition, the asset database calculates the conceptual-level cost associated with replacing an asset including design contingency, general conditions, contractor overhead and profit, and engineering, legal, and administrative costs. If the Town had to replace all of the existing infrastructure today (due to an unlikely catastrophe), the conceptual-level cost would be expected in the range of $200 million. The asset database includes an analysis of the criticality, vulnerability, and risk of each asset. The impacts to public health and safety, effects on operations, impacts to the environment, and cost of repair of each asset are evaluated and create an overall criticality score. The higher the score the more critical the asset and the lower the score the less critical. The vulnerability of the asset, meaning the likelihood of failure, is evaluated as a number between zero and one. Assets assigned a zero indicate new, conversely assets assigned a value of one are expected to fail within less than two years (based on industry standard useful life). Using both the criticality score and the vulnerability the risk of the asset is determined with higher numbers representing higher risk and lower numbers representing lower risk. The asset database is a tool that provides the Town of Fraser an in-depth list of water assets for tracking and future planning purposes. See Appendix B for Asset Database. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 19 Project Number 65421166 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Indoor Demands Water demand projections were used to estimate how demands may increase over the next 10 years. Projected demand was calculated primarily based on the land use type of development planned for each parcel. Although the original Town area is well developed, there are locations where in-fill development is planned. In addition, there is major development currently underway in the areas of Rendezvous and Grand Park, which include residential, commercial development, open space, and public amenities. Demand estimates were calculated based on the Single-Family Equivalent (SFE) unit for the North System and the Equivalent Residential Units (EQRs) for the South System. An SFE is defined as the amount of water consumed by a typical single-family household on a daily basis. For planning purposes, one SFE for areas served by the North System is defined as 300 gallons per day (gpd). This value has historically been used by the Town of Fraser for planning in the North System and is currently used for demand estimation in Byer’s Peak Ranch. Demand estimates for areas served by the South System are based on the Maryvale Plan for Augmentation in Case No. 98CW041 (formerly Case No. 86CW258) which identifies one EQR as 275 gpd. 3.2 Existing Demand Data and Land Use Schedules In terms of development, different building types have different SFE or EQR values assigned. The Town has populated demand information for existing parcels, quantified by the number of SFEs or EQRs depending on whether the parcel is served in the North or South System, respectively. For new development, the values used for various building types for areas served by the North System are based on the Town of Fraser Ordinance No. 436 Part 1 (Exh. A), 2016, and can be generalized as follows. Single-family residences, mixed-use residential, and commercial structures are assessed a number of SFEs based upon the meter size in accordance with the schedule shown in Table 3. Multi-family residences are assessed by the Town based on the unit type, as shown in Table 4. Table 3 – Single-Family, Mixed-Use Residential, and Commercial SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser) Meter Size Single-Family Residential Mixed-Use Residential / Commercial ⅝" or ¾" meter 1 SFE 1 SFE 1" meter 1 SFE 2 SFE 1½" meter 4 SFE 4 SFE 2" meter 8 SFE 8 SFE 3" meter 12 SFE 12 SFE 4" meter 24 SFE 24 SFE 6" meter 48 SFE 48 SFE Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 20 Project Number 65421166 Table 4 – Multi-Family Residential SFE Schedule (Town of Fraser) Multi-Family Residential Unit Type SFEs Individually owned units (e.g. townhomes and condominiums) 1 SFE Multi-family rental units Studio unit 0.25 SFE One- or two-bedroom unit 0.3 SFE Additional bedrooms, additional unit 0.1 SFE In addition to the SFE schedules above, the Town of Fraser also specifies 0.35 SFEs for each accessory dwelling unit. The EQR values for various building types in areas served by the South System are based on the Maryvale Decree and are as follows: 1 Single-Family Residential unit = 1.0 EQR 1 Multi-Family Residential unit = 0.8 EQR 1 Hotel/Lodging unit = 0.35 EQR Commercial or retail/office space = 0.6 EQR per 1,000 ft2. The existing SFE/EQR values were provided by the Town of Fraser, the existing SFE/EQR served by the Town is 1,816 rounded up to 1,820. Next the number of existing SFE/EQR being served by either the North or South System was considered. The North system serves 975 SFE and the South system serves 845 EQR. 3.2.1 Existing Water Demand As part of the water efficiency plan the historical water usage was analyzed. Historical water usage helps define how and where water is used, in what seasons of the year and why, and how water use can be reasonably reduced. Over five years of meter records were analyzed to characterize historical demand in Fraser (October 2016 through June 2022), but the records for 2019, 2020, and 2021 are most complete. Table 5 - Annual Water Delivered and Nonrevenue Water, 2017-2021 Year Annual Delivered Water (millions of gallons, MG) Annual Nonrevenue Water (millions of gallons, MG) Annual Nonrevenue Water (% of annual treated water) 2017 51.6 Not analyzed Not analyzed 2018 57.2 Not analyzed Not analyzed 2019 55.7 12.9 20% 2020 61.9 16.4 21% 2021 55.3 19.1 26% Annual delivered water is the sum of all metered water, which is less than the annual total water treated at the treatment facilities. The difference between these two values is an estimate of the annual Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 21 Project Number 65421166 nonrevenue water, which is water that was treated but was lost to non-metered purposes. These losses are categorized as: Unbilled authorized uses (e.g. hydrant use, flushing, construction water use, municipal unmetered irrigation, etc.) Real losses (leaks in the water distribution system before water reaches service lines) Apparent losses (unauthorized consumption, data errors, and metering inaccuracies) The Town of Fraser’s Water Efficiency Plan (Merrick, 2022) documents existing water demand. The Water Efficiency Plan is considered a sister-document to the 10-Year Water CIP and is included in Appendix A. Some of the capital improvement projects can be attributed to these losses, including meter testing and replacement, leak detection and prevention, and looping dead ends. 3.2.2 Land Use Schedules One challenge when developing this CIP was the different development areas and development schedules within the Town water system limits. The Town has adopted several guiding plans that can be found on the Town’s website. These plans include a series of planning documents, Winter Park long-range plans and studies, Fraser Valley long-range plans and studies, and county wide long-range plans and studies. Between 1986 and 2003, the Town annexed areas now known as Rendezvous and Grand Park. The annexation agreements included agreed-upon planned development with planned land-use types. Water demand and sewer contributions were estimated. As development unfolds, constraining development to the agreed upon projections will benefit the Town as it relates to providing adequate water service to its population. At present, these annexed areas represent the greatest potential impact to the Town because the timeline to buildout is uncertain. An alternative for the Town to monitor the new development is to develop a schedule for these areas that is associated with number of dwelling units or SFEs. This way the Town could determine when the developer or the Town may need to construct additional wells or storage tanks to provide the service to these new developments. It should be noted that the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (recorded in Grand County, CO, 2005-012709) includes approximately 2,400 residential dwelling units is not included in the demand projections because development is expected to exceed 10-years and time to buildout is not known. Section 4 - Future Projections, includes 72 EQR for known Grand Park development. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 22 Project Number 65421166 4 FUTURE PROJECTIONS 4.1 Future Buildout Areas To develop demand projections, future build out areas were coordinated with the Town. The following developments were considered for the South System: Rendezvous Filing 12 – 20 EQR residential development (2 year build out) Portion of Grand Park – 72 EQR residential development (2 year build out) The balance of the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (recorded in Grand County, CO, 2005- 012709) that includes approximately 2,400 residential dwelling units is not included in the demand projections because development is expected to exceed the 10-YR Water CIP timeframe and time to buildout is not known. The following developments were considered for the North System: Byers Peak Ranch Planning Areas 1, 2 & 3 – 343 SFE residential development (2 year build out) Victoria Village – 70 SFE residential development (3 year build out) Clayton Court – 32.67 SFE commercial development (10 year build out) Byers Peak Ranch – 890 SFE master plan residential development (10 year build out) It should be noted that per the Town of Fraser Water & Wastewater Service Agreement in Appendix A the Byers Peak Properties development shall not exceed 1,233 SFEs. For demand projections it is assumed Planning Areas 1, 2 & 3 totaling 343 SFEs will be built in the first two years and the remaining 890 SFEs are spread out over 10 years. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 23 Project Number 65421166 The future build-out areas were assumed to develop linearly over the build out period for each development. See Table 6 below showing breakdown of the SFE/EQR projections. Table 6 – Fraser 10-Year SFE/EQR Projections Year Total North System South System SFE/EQR SFE EQR 2022 1,820 975 845 2023 2,153 1,262 891 2024 2,486 1,549 937 2025 2,602 1,665 937 2026 2,694 1,757 937 2027 2,786 1,849 937 2028 2,879 1,942 937 2029 2,971 2,034 937 2030 3,063 2,126 937 2031 3,155 2,218 937 2032 3,248 2,311 937 As discussed in Section 1, the population projection for 2032 is 1,584 people. Adding future buildout water demand based on the total numbers of SFE/EQR is anticipated to add 1,428 SFE/EQR for a total anticipated SFE/EQR demand of 3,248. It is likely that growth will bring a mix of year-round as well as seasonal residences. The seasonal housing stock could be second homes, AirBnBs, or other vacation rental. For planning purposes, infrastructure must be in place to provide services on demand, based on the SFE/EQR count. 4.2 Demand Projections Using the SFE/EQR projections from Table 6, the Average Day Demand (ADD), Max Day Demand (MDD), Peak Hour Demand (PHD) were calculated. To calculate the average day demand the North system defines 300 gallons per day for each SFE, while the South system defines 275 gallons per day for each EQR. Maximum Day Demand was determined by applying a factor of 1.5 to the Average Day Demand. Peak Hour Demand was determined by applying a factor of 4.0 to the Average Day Demand. Table 7 below shows demand projections for each system. The Well Field Capacity is the amount of water the wells produce and was analyzed to determine when additional wells will likely need to be drilled. For the North System, the 2020 Well Field Capacity in winter was determined to be 659,520 gpd, this information was provided by HRS. For the South System, 2022 Well Field Capacity was determined to be 502,560 gpd, this information was provided by HRS. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 24 Project Number 65421166 Required Safe Well Yield represents the required amount of water needed from the water wells to safely service the Town and prevent damage to the well systems. To calculate the Required Safe Well Yield for both the North and South systems, a safety factor of 100 gallons per minute (144,000 gpd) was added to the maximum day demand projections for the next ten years, this is consistent with analysis done by HRS. Example of Required Safe Well Yield for 2022 is shown below: 𝑅𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒 𝑊𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 = 𝑀𝐷𝐷 + 144,000 𝑔𝑝𝑑 Year 2022 582,750 𝑔𝑝𝑑 = 438,750 𝑔𝑝𝑑 + 144,000 𝑔𝑝𝑑 The remaining well field capacity was then calculated, with negative numbers showing insufficient water is available. Based on these calculations it appears that the North and South System will require an additional well to be drilled in 2023 to provide sufficient volume. However, in December 2022 it was determined that approximately 184 SFE/EQR currently served by the North System must be shifted to the South System. The number of SFE/EQRs to be shifted may increase pending additional calculation by the Town. Shifting these SFE/EQR would provide some relief to the North System and potentially delay the timing of the need for the new well and expedite the need for a well in the South System. Table 8 summarizes well field capacities. The balance of the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan (recorded in Grand County, CO, 2005- 012709) that includes approximately 2,400 residential dwelling units is not included in the well field analysis because development is expected to exceed the 10-YR Water CIP timeframe and time to buildout is not known. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 25 Project Number 65421166 Table 7 – Fraser 10-Year Demand Projections Table 8 - Fraser Well Field Capacity North System South System 2020 Well Field Capacity Required Safe Well Yield Remaining Capacity 2022 Well Field Capacity Required Safe Well Yield Remaining Capacity Year (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) (gpd) 2022 659,520 582,750 76,770 502,560 492,563 9,998 2023 659,520 711,945 (52,425) 502,560 511,538 (8,978) 2024 659,520 841,140 (181,620) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2025 659,520 893,160 (233,640) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2026 659,520 934,681 (275,161) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2027 659,520 976,201 (316,681) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2028 659,520 1,017,721 (358,201) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2029 659,520 1,059,241 (399,721) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2030 659,520 1,100,761 (441,241) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2031 659,520 1,142,281 (482,761) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) 2032 659,520 1,183,802 (524,282) 502,560 530,513 (27,953) North System South System Year ADD MDD PHD ADD MDD PHD gpd gpd gpd gpd gpd gpd 2022 292,500 438,750 1,170,000 232,375 348,563 929,500 2023 378,630 567,945 1,514,520 245,025 367,538 980,100 2024 464,760 697,140 1,859,041 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2025 499,440 749,160 1,997,761 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2026 527,120 790,681 2,108,482 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2027 554,801 832,201 2,219,202 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2028 582,481 873,721 2,329,922 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2029 610,161 915,241 2,440,643 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2030 637,841 956,761 2,551,363 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2031 665,521 998,281 2,662,084 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 2032 693,201 1,039,802 2,772,804 257,675 386,513 1,030,700 Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 26 Project Number 65421166 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN When developing the list of recommended projects for the 10-year Water CIP, several resources were consulted including the following: Town of Fraser Water Supply Master Plan (Brown and Caldwell, 2008) Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report (HRS, 2020) Town of Fraser Water Distribution System Master Plan (Bowman, 2020) Fraser Firming Project Study (JRS, 2015) Summary of Capital Improvements Projects for 2023 Budget Cycle Technical Memorandum (Merrick, 2022) Water Efficiency Plan (Merrick, 2022) HRS page (2022) Each of the documents recommended CIPs. Working with the Town, those CIPs that were not implemented and remained relevant were carried forward to this 10-Year Water CIP report. Discussions with Town Staff revealed potential CIPs needed to address issues not included in the documents above. Recommended CIP projects were broken down into three categories: supply, distribution system and policy. Supply CIPs include improvements related to raw water supply, wells, augmentation, and other raw water infrastructure. Distribution System CIPs include improvements to existing infrastructure such as storage tanks, waterlines, PRVs, meters, and potable water infrastructure. Policy items represent recommended studies, revisions to Town code, and other administrative efforts that may involve capital expenditures and support of Town Leadership. Recommended CIPs are presented in Table 9 on the following page. The source of item is shown; 2008 corresponds with projects mentioned previously in the 2008 report by Brown and Caldwell, TM corresponds with projects from the technical memo prepared by Merrick, 2015 corresponds with the Fraser Firming Project Study, and WEP represents projects from the Water Efficiency Plan. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 27 Project Number 65421166 Table 9 - Capital Improvement Projects Supply Source of Item Capital Improvement Project 1 2008 Planning and preliminary engineering for developing St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension Water rights for non-potable supply. 2 2015 Surface Water Treatment Plant – St. Louis Creek (2026 Water Quality Testing, Environmental Investigations, 2027 Land Acquisition, 2031 Construction) 3 2008 Siting and design of additional water supply well for Fraser System well field. 4 2008 Drilling, construction and testing of additional water supply well. 5 2008 Site selection, planning, and preliminary engineering design for Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) 6 2008 Phase I - Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) 7 2008 Phase II - Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) 8 2008 Planning and preliminary engineering to fully augment the Fraser System Well field by developing required upstream storage for exchange and augmentation. Distribution System Source of Item Capital Improvement Project 9 2008 Replace distribution pipeline in southeast corner (Elk Creek Drive to Old Victory Road) of Town to meet fire flow requirements. 10 2008 Additional 500,000 gallon Blue Zone Storage Tank to meet maximum day plus fire flow demand. 11 2008 Planning and preliminary engineering design required to determine the quantity of additional treated water storage required for potential Blue Zone Tank expansion. 12 2008 Replacement distribution system loop between Eisenhower, HWY 40, and Fraser Avenue. 13 Town North-South System Connection - Conceptual Design Phase for issue with water rights/augmentation. 14 TM Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements 15 TM Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters (Wolverine, Badger, Ermine, Ferret) 16 TM Waterline Improvements for Quail Drive 17 TM North-South System Exchange 18 Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave (850 LF x $2,350 / LF) 19 Waterline Improvements for Eisenhower Dr (600 LF x $2,350 / LF) 20 Waterline Improvements for Fraser Ave (550 LF x $2,350 / LF) 21 Waterline Improvements for Eastom Ave (465 LF x $2,350 / LF) 22 Install New North Water Treatment Plant Booster Pump 23 Replace Transite Pipe that serves out-of-town homes in Byers Peak Ranch 24 Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Piping (50 LF 2” Steel) 25 Red Zone Pump Station Updates (Pumps, Pressure Gauges, PLC, SCADA, and Antennas) 26 WEP Meter Testing and Replacement (assume 100 replaced per year $450 per meter) 27 WEP Leak Prevention and Replacement (assume $100,000 per year for 10 years) 28 WEP Looping Dead Ends (assume $250,000 per year for years 2026-2029) 29 Water System Model Updates 30 Water Efficiency Plan Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 28 Project Number 65421166 Policy Source of Item Capital Improvement Project 31 WEP Rate Study (Assume 2023 and 2028) Using the asset database and this list of capital improvement projects an unconstrained model was built. The unconstrained model is developed if the Town had unlimited funds to construct all the CIPs and replace any assets that are past their useful life. See Figure 10 below of unconstrained model. The total cost for 2023 for the unconstrained model is over $30 million. One thing to note is that there is some overlap between the CIPs and the asset database, some of the projects in the CIP list address issues or replace assets in the asset database, for the unconstrained model what this means is that there could be double counting for example the water meters. We know that this is unrealistic and leads us to the constrained model. With guidance from the Town about priorities and yearly budgets we can create a more realistic model. The constrained model aims for a yearly budget of less than $2 million. Naturally by constraining the budget different projects are pushed out into the future. See Figure 11 below of constrained model. Both unconstrained and constrained models are included in Appendix B. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 29 Project Number 65421166 Figure 10 - Unconstrained Model Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 30 Project Number 65421166 Figure 11 - Constrained Model Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 31 Project Number 65421166 5.1 2023 CIP The following projects have been identified for completion in 2023: Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements ($1.72M) – this project will replace aging waterline in Byers Avenue to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. Rate Study ($90,000) – rate study will advise the Town on potential changes to rate structure. Identified by the Water Efficiency Plan. Water System Model Updates ($51,300) – proposed engineering effort to update the Town water hydraulic model. Updates to the hydraulic model will better inform the Town regarding future CIPs and expose any constraints to the system. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. 5.2 2024 CIP The following projects have been identified for completion in 2024: Siting and Design of Additional Water Supply Well for Fraser System Well Field ($22,000) – location determination, planning, engineering for additional water well. This project was identified by the 2008 Master Plan and the calculations with the 10-year CIP support the need for the additional well. Drilling, Construction, and Testing of Additional Water Supply Well (placeholder cost $250,000) – After the planning and engineering phase this project consists of the construction and installation of the 100 feet deep alluvium well. This project was identified by the 2008 Master Plan and the calculations with the 10-year CIP support the need for the additional well. Assume the well will be brought on-line in 2026. Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters ($1.06M) – this project consists of waterline improvements to Badger Lane, Wolverine Lane, Ermine Lane, and Ferret Lane in the Blue Zone on the east side of the Town. Each of these roads have a dead-end water line and this project would provide looping, increase reliability, and improve water quality. North-South System Connection Conceptual Design Phase ($40,000) – this project consists of planning and engineering for the improvement required to shift the water supply from the North System to the South System for the 184 existing homes in Grand Park. Planning and engineering for Blue Zone Tank Expansion ($47,000) – this project consists of determining the location and engineering for new Blue Zone Tank. Increase in demand driven by the development in Byers Peak is the leading factor for the need for the expansion or additional tank. Install New North Water Treatment Plant Booster Pump ($61,000) – asset database shows the pump for the treatment plant is at the end of its useful life and needs to be replaced. This project would propose to buy a new pump and keep the others in service until failure. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 32 Project Number 65421166 Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Piping ($184,000) – Town staff has identified concerns with the Red Zone Pump Station infrastructure and this project would replace the pressure reducing valves and 50 linear feet of pipe 2” pipe. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and pipe replacement as needed. 5.3 2025 CIP The following projects have been identified for completion in year 2025: North-South System Exchange ($330,000) – this project consists of the improvements required to shift the water supply from the North System to the South System for the 184 existing homes in Grand Park. Waterline Improvements for Quail Drive ($198,000) – this project will improve looping of waterlines in Quail Drive to improve water quality, increase reliability and decrease risk of freezing. Waterline Improvements Elk Creek Drive to Old Victory Road ($628,000) – this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan and will improve reliability and meet fire flow requirements. Updates to the hydraulic modeling will better inform the improvements that are required. Site Selection, Planning, and Preliminary Engineering for Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir ($234,000) – this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan. This project proposes an augmentation reservoir from Elk Creek and is a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. 5.4 2026 CIP 500,000-gallon Blue Zone Storage Tank ($1.1M) – this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan to meet maximum day plus fire flow requirements. The calculations with the 10-year CIP support the need for the additional Blue Zone Storage Tank. The increase in demand from the Byers Peak development is the leading factor for the need of the additional tank. Planning and Engineering for St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension ($234,000) – this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan to expand the water rights to a non-potable supply. This project is a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights and coincides with the Surface Water Treatment Plant project. Surface Water Treatment Plant ($200,000) – the surface water treatment plant was identified in the 2015 Firming Study as a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights. This project coincides with Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 33 Project Number 65421166 the St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension. This project consists of $100,000 for water quality testing and $100,000 for environmental investigations. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10-year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 5.5 2027 CIP Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave ($2M) - this project will replace aging waterline in Mill Avenue to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. Surface Water Treatment Plant – St. Louis Creek ($1.7M) – the surface water treatment plant was identified in the 2015 Firming Study as a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights. This project cost is for land acquisition of the treatment plant. A four-acre site was assumed with an assumed price of $9 per square foot. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10-year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 5.6 2028 CIP Phase I – Possible Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir ($1.1M) – this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan as a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights. Project proposes an augmentation reservoir from Elk Creek. Water Efficiency Plan ($45,000) – this project would be an update to the Water Efficiency Plan to build on the effort completed in 2023. It is typical to update the Water Efficiency Plan every five years. Rate Study ($90,000) – rate study will advise the Town on potential changes to rate structure. Identified by the Water Efficiency Plan. It is typical to study and possibly update rates every five years. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 34 Project Number 65421166 Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10-year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 5.7 2029 CIP Waterline Improvements for Eisenhower Drive ($1.4M) - this project will replace aging waterline in Eisenhower Drive to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. Looping Dead Ends ($250,000 per year) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified looping dead ends as an issue to be addressed. The Quail Drive and Furry Critters improvements listed above address this issue. The 10-year CIP proposes to assume $250,000 per year in years 4-7 to improve circulation and looping. 5.8 2030 CIP Red Zone Pump Station Updates ($317,000) – some of the infrastructure for the Red Zone Pump Station including: pumps, pressure gauges, PLC, SCADA, and antennas are aging and due to be replaced. This project was identified by the Town staff as a concern to be addressed. Replacement Distribution Loop ($190,000) – this project was identified in the 2008 Master Plan. The project proposed a replacement distribution loop between Eisenhower, Hwy 40 and Fraser Avenue. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 35 Project Number 65421166 5.9 2031 CIP Surface Water Treatment Plant – St. Louis Creek ($5.7M) – the surface water treatment plant was identified in the 2015 Firming Study as a beneficial use of the Town’s water rights. This project cost is for construction of the treatment plant. Transite Pipe ($3.3M) – this project was identified by the Town as a concern. This project proposed to replace 4,500 linear feet of transite pipe that serves out-of-town homes in Byers Peak Ranch Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. 5.10 2032 CIP Waterline Improvements for Fraser Avenue ($1.3M) - this project will replace aging waterline in Fraser Avenue to improve reliability and decrease chance of freezing. Meter Testing and Replacement ($45,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified broken or non- functional water meters as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposes to replace 100 meters per year with an assumed $450 per meter replacement cost. Leak Prevention and Replacement ($100,000) – The Water Efficiency Plan identified leaking waterlines as an issue to be addressed. The 10-year CIP proposed to assume $100,000 is spent per year for leak detection and replacement as needed. Planning and Engineering for Fraser System Augmentation ($234,000) – this project was identified by the 2008 Master Plan. The project consists of planning, location determination, engineering, for the Fraser System Well field to be fully augmented by developing the required upstream storage for exchange and augmentation. If the recent projects for the St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension/Surface Water Treatment Plant and Forest Meadows Augmentation Project meet the requirements this planning and engineering project is unnecessary. Town of Fraser 10-Year Water CIP Report 36 Project Number 65421166 REFERENCES Associates, M. &. (October 2, 2002). Water and Sewer Master Plan Rendevous Development. Brown and Caldwell. (January 18, 2008). Water Supply Master Plan. Town of Fraser. HRS Water Consultants, Inc. (2020). Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report. Town of Fraser. HRS Water Consultants, Inc. (August 12, 2022). Fraser Water Rights Summary. JRS Engineer Consultant, L. &. (2015). Fraser Firming Project Study. Fraser: Town of Fraser. Town of Fraser. (2021). Design Criteria and Construction Standards. Town of Fraser 10-Year CIP Report APPENDIX A Employee Owned 2480 W. 26th Street, Unit B225 Denver, Colorado 80211 Tel: +1 303-964-3333 hello@merrick.com www.merrick.com MEMORANDUM August 4, 2022 TO: Ed Cannon, Town Manager, Town of Fraser FROM: Julie Koehler, PE, Merrick and Company RE: SUMMARY OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS FOR 2023 BUDGET CYCLE INTRODUCTION Town of Fraser requested Merrick’s assistance with budget planning for 2023. The focus is on projects that were scheduled for, but not completed in 2022 and one project identified in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (Merrick, June 2022). Section 1 of this memo is organized by project name, the budget request for 2023, the budget request for 2024 if needed, and a brief description of the project. The project titles include the following: West Old-Town Sewer Capacity Improvements to Address I&I Fraser River Trail pavement replacement Update and Breakout the 2021 Water System Improvements projects o Improvements to Badger Lane, Wolverine Lane, Ermine Lane, Ferret Lane (Furry Critters) o Improvements to Quail Drive o Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults o Re-design of Byers Ave Waterline Replacement o Re-design of Lions Pond Restroom Improvements (by others) Sewer Main Replacement (Leonard Ln to Doc Susie) – Currently in design development with opinion of cost to be provided with the 60% drawings under separate cover. Section 2 provides a detailed Opinion of Total Anticipated Project Cost (OTAPC) for each project. SECTION 1 - PROJECTS The West Old-Town Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. 2023 Requested Funds $88,000 2024 Requested Funds $1,120,000 The Town of Fraser Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (Merrick, 2022) recommends the West Old- Town Sewer Capacity Improvements Project. The project will upsize and replace approximately 840 feet of 10- inch sewer pipe and 480 feet of 12-inch sewer pipe. The goals of the project are to decrease the amount of Infiltration and Inflow (I&I) and replace aged sewer pipe that is at the end of its useful life. Upsizing the pipelines will increase capacity in the pipes to allow new development to connect to the sewer collection system. 2 The OTAPC for the West Old-Town Sewer Capacity Improvements project is $1,220,000 including $88,000 in engineering design fees. Fraser River Trail Pavement Replacement Project. 2023 Requested Funds $410,000 The existing asphalt surface of the Fraser River Trail is in need of replacement. The recommended method for replacement is a non-traditional 1-inch mill (typical mill depth is 2” which is not suitable given existing asphalt depth) followed by a 2-inch overlay. This system is expected to last 10 to 15 years. The OTAPC is $410,000 including $34,000 in engineering fees. Update and Breakout the 2021 Water System Improvements Projects. 2023 Requested Funds: Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters $1,060,000 Waterline Improvements to Quail Drive $198,000 Pressure Reducing Valve Vault Improvements $330,000 Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements $1,720,000 Waterline improvements will improve reliability, decrease chance of freezing, and improve looping of waterlines to decrease dead end waterlines in the neighborhoods. Improvements to pressure reducing valves and vaults will improve pressure regulation between pressure zones. Anticipated project costs were broken out by components and includes the three following items: Improvements to Badger Lane, Wolverine Lane, Ermine Lane, Ferret Lane (Furry Critters) Improvements to Quail Drive Pressure Reducing Valve Vaults The OTAPC for the entire project is $3,310,000. SECTION 2 – DETAILED OPINION OF TOTAL ANTICIPATED PROJECT COST Detailed Opinions of Total Anticipated Project Costs (OTAPC) have been developed for the projects identified in Section 1. The OTAPCs are based on high-level concepts; existing documentation and design criteria; and conceptual levels of detail. Recent projects bid and constructed in the Front Range and on the Western Slope as well as manufacturer’s representatives and installers budgetary quotations were referenced with development of the OTAPC. Actual project costs will depend on actual market conditions at the time of project implementation. The volatility over the past few years underscores the impact of changing labor and material costs, actual site conditions, productivity, competitive market conditions, final project scope and schedule, and other variables. The OTAPC is based on the categories defined by the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) as shown in Table 1. 3 Table 1. AACE Categories Type of Cost Estimating Anticipated Accuracy Class 5 (Conceptual) +100% to -50% Class 4 (Planning Level) +50% to -30% Class 3 (Preliminary Design) +30% to -15% Class 2 (50% to 70% Design) +20% to -10% Class 1 (Pre-Bid) +15% to -5% The OTAPC for the West Old-Town Sewer Capacity Improvements project is considered a Class 5 opinion. The OTAPC for the Fraser River Trail Pavement Replacement project is considered a Class 3 opinion. The OTAPC for the Update and Breakout of the 2021 Water System Improvements Projects is considered a Class 1 opinion. The Town of Fraser’s North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the “Fraser Wells”) with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. The total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed a pumping rate of 2.28 cfs. Pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town, and are “exchange to” structures for the Town’s decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out-of- priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. The Town of Fraser’s South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed, and currently includes four active wells (Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 4, 5 and 7) with 1999 appropriation dates. These wells supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. The wells are included i n the Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation ("Maryvale Augmentation Plan") which was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties (up to 2,822 equivalent residential units ("EQRs") and irrigate 17 acres ). The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the Cozens Ditch water right, which was changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage from the Maryvale Reservoir or Grand Park Ponds. The Town also owns surface water rights on the St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension Ditch and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. These ditches that are decreed for irrigation purposes. Additionally, the Town owns reservoir water storage capacity for replacement and exchange purposes in reservoirs located at Fraser, i.e. Grand County Water and Sanitation District Reservoir No. 2 and at other downstream reservoirs. Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan Update Report June 2020 Prepared by Town of Fraser Staff, Chris Thorne Matt Tieslau Greenberg Traurig, LLP & Mark Palumbo Steve Barrett HRS Water Consultants, Inc. i Glossary of Terms • Ac = Acre = 1 Ac = 43,560 Square Feet • Af = Acre-Feet = 1 Af = 325,851 gallons • Avg = Arithmetic Average • Af/Ac/Yr = Acre-Feet per Acre per Year • Af/EQR = Acre-Feet per Equivalent Residential Unit • Af/Yr = Acre-Feet per Year • CFS = Cubic Feet Per Second = 1 cfs = 448.8 GPM and 1 CFS/day = 1.9835 acre- feet • EQR = Equivalent Residential Unit - 1 EQR is typically considered to equate to full- time occupancy for an average of 2.75 people. EQRs are reduced for multi-family and commercial units. 1 EQR has a water demand of 275 gallons/day. • Ft = Feet • Gal = Gallon of Water • GPM = Gallons Per Minute • GPM/EQR = Gallons Per Minute/Equivalent Residential Unit • Hp = Horse Power • Q = Well Pumping Discharge Rate • WTP = Water Treatment Plant • WY = Water Year (November 1 – October 31) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems ………………..... A. Legal Water Supplies for the North Fraser System ………………………………………... i. Town of Fraser’s Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply …………………. (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System ………………………………………………………………….. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4 and 5 …………………………………………… (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 ………………………………………………………….. ii. Surface Water Rights ……………………………………………………………….. (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension ………………………… (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 …………………………………………………………. iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights ……………………………… (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts ……………. (a) Twenty-Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir …………………………………………………………. (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir ………………………………….. (c) Windy Gap Project Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir …………… (2) Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement …………………………. (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement ……………………………………. iv. Storage – Fraser Reservoir No. 2 ………………………………………………… v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation ………………………………………… B. Legal Water Supplies for the South System …………………………………….. i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan ………………………………………………………. ii. Wells ………………………………………………………………………………….. (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 ………………………………………………. (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 …………………………………………. iii. Surface Water Rights ……………………………………………………………….. (1) Cozens Ditch ……………………………………………………………………. (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension…………………………………… ii. Reservoir/Pond Storage …………………………………………………………… iii (1) Mary’s Pond ……………………………………………………………………. (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights ………………………………………………. B. Other Water Rights …………………………………………………………………. i. Decreed Exchanges ……………………………………………………………... (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange ……………………………………….. (2) Middle Park Exchange ……………………………………………………… II. Physical Water Supply Demand for the North System …………………………….. A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System …………………………. i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR ……………….. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs …………………………………………… iii. Monthly Demand ………………………………………………………………… iv. Max Day Demands ……………………………………………………………… B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System ……………………… i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR …………………….. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs …………………………………………… iii. Monthly Demand ………………………………………………………………… iii. Max Day Demands ……………………………………………………………… C. Current Water Supply for the North System ……………………………………. i. Fraser Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Sage Yield …………………. ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data ………………………………………………………………….. D. Current Water Supply for the South System …………………………………. i. Maryvale Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield ……………….. ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter …….. E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System ………………. i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQRs for the North System ………… ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands ……………………………….. iii. Max Day Demands ………………………………………………………………... F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the South System ……………. i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System ………. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation …………………………………………………………………….. iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands ………………………………………… CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………………………. iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1: North System Wells page 3 Table 2: South System Wells pages 8-9 Table 3: Current North System Demands Appendix Table 4: Current South System Demands Appendix Table 5: Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates pages 13-14 Table 6: North System Wellfield - Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Information Appendix Table 7: Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates page 15 Table 8: South System Wellfield – Hydrogeologic, Construction, and Equipping Details Appendix Table 9: North System – Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 10: North System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix Table 11: South System – Future Demand to Buildout Appendix Table 12: South System Well Pumping to Meet Demand Appendix 1 INTRODUCTION This 2020 Update to the Town of Fraser Water Supply Plan (“Updated Water Plan”) is primarily intended to provide a “picture in time” of the current legal and physical water supplies available to the Town of Fraser (the “Town”), in its role as a municipal water supplier. It is hoped and intended that the Updated Water Plan will be useful to the Town Board in decision- making and policy determinations regarding water supply issues, and as a resource to evaluate future potential growth and development; to the Town Staff, as a reference source for planning efforts, which identifies both the current limitations and future growth potential of the municipal water system; and to current and future, potential residents and business owners in the Town, who may be interested in a better understanding of the Town’s water supplies. The Updated Water Plan relies heavily upon, and is generally intended as an update to, prior water supply planning efforts undertaken by the Town, including efforts in 2007 (resulting in a draft “Water Supply Master Plan” report, primarily prepared by Brown & Caldwell), and in 2015 (resulting in the draft “Fraser Firming Project Study” report prepared by HRS Water Consultants, Inc. (“HRS”) and JRS Engineering Consultant, LLC), and less formal efforts by the Town Staff and its water team over the years. Preparation of the Updated Water Plan was a collaborative effort involving input from the Fraser Town Board of Trustees; the Fraser Town Staff; HRS; and the Town’s water rights counsel. The Town’s municipal water supply facilities include two independent, but physically connected, systems: (1) the “North System”, which generally supplies geographic areas of the Town known as “Old Town Fraser”, and the Byers Peak Properties development; and (2) the “South System” which supplies geographic areas of the Town encompassing the Rendezvous and Grand Park developments. This report is divided into two sections. The first section is a general description of the current legal water supplies for both the North and South Systems. The second section discusses the current and projected future water supply demands, and physical supplies for both the North and South Systems. I. Current Legal Water Supplies for the North and South Systems A. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE NORTH SYSTEM i. Town of Fraser’s Alluvial Well Field (Domestic Water Supply) The North System includes a well field of nine decreed wells (the “Fraser Wells”) with appropriation dates of 1982 and 1985. (See Table 1, North System Wells). As described in more detail below, pursuant to various Water Court decrees, the Fraser Wells operate as alternate points of diversion for more senior surface water rights owned by the Town, and are “exchange to” structures for the Town’s decreed exchanges. Additionally, the Town owns and will operate in the future, a decreed plan for augmentation that covers out-of-priority depletions from Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2. 2 (1) Fraser Wells as Alternate Points of Diversion for Fraser Domestic Water System The original legal source for Fraser’s “domestic water system” was decreed absolute in Civil Action 1175 for 2.28 cfs with an appropriation date of September 12, 1954 and an adjudication date of January 14, 1957 (the “Fraser Domestic Water Supply System”). The Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right is decreed for domestic and municipal purposes, including irrigation and fire protection. In Civil Action W-2279, the original point of diversion on St. Louis Creek for this water right, was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. Later, in Case Nos. 82CW219 and 85CW339, the Town’s alluvial wells were decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water Supply System water right. This water right was in use for municipal and domestic use prior to October 1977 and, therefore, is covered by augmentation or replacement releases from the Historic Users Pool, or “HUP”, in Green Mountain Reservoir. (2) Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 In Case No. 82CW219, Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 3(a), 3(b), 4, and 5 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of July 22, 1982 and an adjudication date of July 5, 1985. Well Nos. 1-5 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. These wells were also decreed as alternate points of diversion for the Town’s Domestic Water System. Under the decree in Case No. 82CW219, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, when the wells are being pumped as alternate points of diversion. This is an important limitation on the legal water supply available to the North System. Additionally, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed the amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System at its decreed point of diversion. Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 are covered by the plan for augmentation approved in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987 (the “Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan”), as described in more detail in Section I.A.v., below. (3) Well Nos. 7, 8, and 9 In Case No. 85CW339, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed conditional with an appropriation date of February 28, 1985 and an adjudication date of November 8, 1988. Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were decreed for irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes. Like Fraser Well Nos. 1-5, Fraser Well Nos. 7-9 were designated as alternate points of diversion for the Fraser Domestic Water System. Again, when the wells are being used as alternate points of diversion, the total amount of water pumped from any well or combination of wells shall not exceed 2.28 cfs, and the total amount of water produced by any well or any combination of wells shall not exceed that amount of water available in priority to the Fraser Domestic Water System water right at its decreed point of diversion, less any stream losses, from the point of diversion to the well locations. 3 Table 1: North System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Date Adjud. Date Amou nt (cfs) Amount Absolute (cfs) Amount Cond. (cfs) Permit No. Fraser Well No. 1 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.285 0.049 32203-F Fraser Well No. 2 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.31 0.136 32204-F Fraser Well No. 3A (inactive) 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.223 0.089 0.134 32205-F Fraser Well No. 3B 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.334 0.156 0.178 32206-F Fraser Well No. 4 (ground water mon. well) 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.0 0.446 32207-F Fraser Well No. 5 82CW219 7/22/1982 7/5/1985 0.446 0.301 0.145 66896-F Fraser Well No. 7 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.17 0.16 34809-F Fraser Well No. 8 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.33 0.0 0.33. 34810-F Fraser Well No. 9 85CW339 2/28/1985 11/8/1988 0.44 0.44 0.0 34811-F ii. Surface Water Rights (1) St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension The St. Louis Creek Ditch Enlargement and Extension was decreed for irrigation purposes in Civil Action 183 with an appropriation date of June 1, 1904 and an adjudication date of August 3, 1911. The Town owns 1.0 cfs, absolute, to divert from St. Louis Creek. The water right was originally decreed for irrigation. In case number W-2280, this water right was changed from its original use to the following new uses: domestic, fire and sanitary, garden and lawn 4 irrigation, and other household uses. Additionally, the point of diversion was changed to the Gaskill Ditch Headgate. The St. Louis Creek water right is not currently connected to the Town’s municipal water supply system; however, the Town continues to evaluate the possibilities for physically incorporating the water available under these senior water rights into its daily water supplies (see, for example, the “Fraser Firming Study Project” report, referenced above), and anticipates and intends such use in the near future. (2) Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 The Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 surface water right was decreed in Civil Action 407 on August 11, 1906 for 2.0 cfs, absolute, to divert out of Elk Creek for irrigation. Pursuant to the terms of the Water Court decree approving the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to “storage use for subsequent augmentation release.” Fraser intends to utilize the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right in the future for the decreed augmentation use, and is currently evaluating various water storage options. iii. Replacement Water Sources and Contract Rights (1) Middle Park Water Conservancy District Allotment Contracts The Town has four water allotment contracts for Windy Gap Project water with the Middle Park Water Conservancy District (“MPWCD”). Two water allotment contracts are for water stored in Granby Reservoir, and two are “Windy Gap Standby Contracts” for water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir. Through all four contracts, the Town currently has leased 157.75 af of Windy Gap Project water. Sixty-five af of that amount currently is subject to a lease to the developer of the Grand Park property. The specific contracts are described in the following subsections. (a) Twenty-Five AF of Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Granby Reservoir Pursuant to a July 11, 1985 water allotment contract with MPWCD Fraser is entitled to 25 af of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir, which is located on the Colorado River upstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. This water allotment contract is perpetual. An exchange of this water from the confluence of the Fraser and Colorado Rivers to the Fraser Wells was decreed in Case No. 85CW337, Water Division 5. This 25 af may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water, pursuant to various agreements among the Town, other Grand County water suppliers, and Denver Water, pursuant to which Denver Water bypasses water available for diversion through its Moffatt Collection System. (b) Eighty AF Stored in Granby Reservoir Fraser is entitled to 80 af of Windy Gap Project water stored in Granby Reservoir pursuant to an August 1, 1989 water allotment contract with MPWCD. This water allotment contract is perpetual. Under a July 10, 1989 Lease Agreement, 65 af of the 80 af has been leased for potential irrigation of a golf course planned, at one time, for the Grand Park development. This 80 af of water is also the subject of a decreed exchange. Pursuant to the decree in Case No. 90CW235, Water Division No. 5, this water can be exchanged to various 5 locations in the Fraser System and Maryvale System. The 15 af not being leased, may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (c) Windy Gap Project Water Stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir Additionally, Fraser is entitled to 52.75 af of Windy Gap Project Standby water stored in Wolford Mountain Reservoir pursuant to two water allotment contracts entered in 2003 and 2004 (“Standby Water”). The Wolford Mountain Reservoir is located on Muddy Creek, which is tributary to the Colorado River downstream of the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers. These two contracts are perpetual and presumably valid if the Town maintains its other MPWCD Windy Gap Contracts. The Standby Water may be available for use by Denver Water as replacement water. (2) Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement Fraser is a party to the Clinton-Reservoir-Fraser River Agreement (“Clinton Reservoir Agreement”), which was signed on July 21, 1992 and amended on October 26, 2016. Pursuant to the Agreement, Denver Water agreed to annually bypass at its intakes and make available from other components of Denver Water’s delivery system, as necessary, 846 af of water to be used under the provisions of the Clinton Agreement and Grand County Water Users’ Operating Plan (“Bypass Water”). The Town is entitled to 104.5 af of the Bypass Water. By decree in Case No. 92CW305, entered on November 19, 1996, Grand County Water & Sanitation District No. 1, Winter Park Water & Sanitation District, the Town of Granby, and the Town of Fraser (“Co-Applicants”) sought and were awarded a conditional water right and approval of a plan for augmentation, including substitution and exchange to implement the provisions of the Clinton Agreement. Pursuant to the original decree and subsequent diligence decrees, water will be diverted under a 1992 priority at Denver’s existing points of diversion and collection system and will be released from Denver’s collection system on the Fraser River, St. Louis Creek, Little Vasquez Creek, and Vasquez Creek into those streams and used by each of the Co-Applicants at locations decreed to each of those entities under their existing water rights. Pursuant to the decree, the Bypass Water can be used for irrigation, domestic, and all municipal uses between September 15 and May 15 each year, but it is not decreed for storage. The seasonal limitation on the use of Bypass Water was eliminated in connection with the CRCA agreements described immediately below. (3) Colorado River Cooperative Agreement On September 23, 2010, Denver Water and seventeen entities from the West Slope executed the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement (“CRCA”), which resolves various longstanding disputes involving Denver Water’s operations on the West Slope. The CRCA took effect on September 26, 2013. Pursuant to the CRCA and the 2012 Grand County Water Users Operating Plan (“GCWUOP”), Denver Water agreed to make 375 af of water available annually to the Grand County signatories (“Additional Bypass Water”), “upon issuance and acceptance by Denver Water of permits necessary for [Denver Water’s] Moffat Project.” Pursuant to the GCWUOP and the related “Implementation Agreement” between Denver Water and the Town, executed on October 9, 2013, the Town is conditionally entitled to 68.75 af of the Additional Bypass Water. 6 Pursuant to the decree entered on March 15, 2016 in Case No. 11CW152, the Additional Bypass Water may be used for municipal, snowmaking, domestic, commercial, irrigation, recreation, fish and wildlife, and fire protection uses. The Additional Bypass Water may be delivered for diversion to Fraser at the following locations: Gaskill Ditch; Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5; and Elk Creek Ditch No. 2. Prior to diverting the Additional Bypass Water through its wells, pursuant to the decree in Case No. 11CW152, Fraser will need to apply for and obtain new well permits to allow for diversion of deliveries of the Additional Bypass Water. iv. Storage – Reservoir No. 2 In Case No. 02CW367, on February 28, 2005, the Grand County Water & Sanitation District (“GCWSD”) decreed GCWSD Reservoir No. 2 (“Reservoir No. 2”) for municipal, irrigation, augmentation, piscatorial, aesthetic, and recreation uses with the right to fill and refill in priority to replace water applied to decreed uses and to replace evaporative losses. The Reservoir No. 2 water right was originally decreed for 80 af, conditional. This reservoir is an off- channel, lined reservoir located southwest of the Fraser River between the Maryvale Wells and the Fraser Wells. On July 31, 2018, the Town acquired from GCWSD No. 1, via deed, 25 af of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and 25 af of the storage capacity in the reservoir. GCWSD No. 1 also conveyed 25 af of the water right and 25 af of the storage capacity to Winter Park Water & Sanitation District (“WPWSD”). In Case No. 18CW3070, 70 af of this water right was decreed absolute for all decreed purposes with 10 af remaining conditional. GCWSD No. 1 owns the remaining 20 af of the Reservoir No. 2 water right and storage capacity. WPWSD, GCWSD, and Fraser executed an operating agreement for Reservoir No. 2 on July 30, 2018. v. Forest Meadows Plan for Augmentation As described above, the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan was decreed in Case No. 83CW362 on May 27, 1987. Pursuant to the approved augmentation plan, one cfs of the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water right was abandoned to Elk Creek, and one cfs was changed to “storage use for subsequent augmentation release.” Additionally, the plan is approved to provide replacement for out-of-priority depletions caused by the pumping of Fraser Well Nos. 1 and 2 for domestic, commercial, municipal, and irrigation uses. Fraser continues to investigate options for the construction of an augmentation pond to enable operation of the Forest Meadows Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Case No. 83CW362, a decreed storage pond for the Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 water, is required to implement the augmentation plan. B. LEGAL WATER SUPPLIES FOR THE SOUTH SYSTEM The following sections describe the legal water supplies for the South System: i. Maryvale Augmentation Plan The Regis Maryvale Plan for Augmentation (“Maryvale Augmentation Plan”) was decreed in Case No. 86CW258 and amended in Case No. 98CW401. It generally provides for the augmentation of water uses associated with the Rendezvous/Grand Park properties. 7 Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement between Fraser and Rendezvous Colorado, LLC (“Amended Annexation Agreement”), dated June 23, 2000, the Maryvale Augmentation Plan was conveyed, in large part, to the Town via Bargain and Sale Deed, dated June 23, 2000, and corrected on October 17, 2011 (the “Deed”). Among other rights, the Deed conveyed to Fraser 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right; 20 af of the “Mary’s Pond” storage water right; 32.7 af of storage in augmentation/detention ponds located on Grand Park (the “Detention Reservoirs”); and “all of the benefits and burdens” of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The Maryvale Augmentation Plan provides for augmentation of 16 large capacity wells (1,600 gpm total) and 91 small capacity wells (maximum pumping rate of 15 gpm) to serve 2,822 equivalent residential units (“EQRs”) and irrigate 17 acres. The primary source of augmentation supply under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan is the 3.125 cfs Cozens Ditch water right, which was historically used for the irrigation of 125 acres, and changed for augmentation use. The changed water right is used for augmentation of domestic, municipal, and irrigation uses either directly or by release from storage. Prior to full build out of the development, the decree contemplates enlargement of the existing Maryvale Reservoir and the construction of up to six of the Detention Reservoirs to store excess historical consumptive use credit water and winter return flows. The 32.7 af of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for full operation of the Augmentation Plan was conveyed to Fraser by the Deed. ii. Wells The South System includes a well system with three decreed well fields. One well field has been partially developed , and currently includes four active wells, which supply water to development on the Rendezvous and Grand Park properties. See Table 2 (“South System Wells”). These four wells were constructed in the Troublesome Formation, which is considered tributary to the Fraser River. Out-of-priority stream depletions from these wells are fully covered by operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. (1) Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 99CW313, the Court adjudicated three of the 16 proposed large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. These wells are known as Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3. The maximum cumulative diversions from the Maryvale Well water rights plus the Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 00CW294, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each individual Maryvale Well is 0.5 cfs (225 gpm). Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 are decreed for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, municipal, stockwatering, and fire protection uses. Pursuant to the Deed, 0.78 cfs cumulative of the Maryvale Well Nos. 1, 2, and 3 water rights was conveyed to Fraser for use in Fraser’s municipal water supply system. Maryvale Well No. 1 was decreed absolute for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes in Case No. 08CW192. The remaining conditional amount is 0.31 cfs (139 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes and 0.5 cfs (225 gpm) for industrial, municipal, stock watering, and fire protection purposes. 8 The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make an additional portion of the Maryvale Well No. 1 water right absolute for municipal purposes in the amount of 0.20 cfs That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3020, is pending. (2) Rendezvous Well Fields 1, 2, and 3 By decree entered on December 31, 2002 in Case No. 00CW294, the Court adjudicated 13 of the 16 large capacity wells covered by the Maryvale Augmentation Plan in three well fields (“Rendezvous Well Field Nos. 1, 2, and 3”). As mentioned above, the maximum cumulative diversions from the Rendezvous Well Field water rights plus the Maryvale Well Nos. 1-3 water rights decreed in Case No. 99CW313, may not exceed 3.57 cfs (1,600 gpm), with a total annual volumetric limit of 892.4 af, as specified in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The amount claimed for each well within the Rendezvous Well Fields is up to 0.56 cfs (250 gpm). In Case. No. 08CW191, three wells were utilized to make a total of 0.57 cfs (255 gpm) of the Rendezvous Well Field No. 3 water right absolute for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purpose as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.99 cfs (40 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.29 cfs (130 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (85 gpm). The total amount made absolute to date between all groundwater rights decreed in Case Nos. 99CW313 and 00CW294 is 0.76 cfs (341 gpm) for domestic, irrigation, and commercial purposes with a total volume of 96.33 af. The Town and Grand Park/Rendezvous recently filed a claim to make additional portions of Maryvale Well Nos. 4, 5, and 7 absolute for municipal use for a total of 0.60 cfs (270 gpm) as follows: Maryvale Well No. 4 for 0.11 cfs (47.3 gpm); Maryvale Well No. 5 for 0.30 cfs (135.7 gpm); and Maryvale Well No. 7 for 0.19 cfs (86.5 gpm). That claim, filed in Case No. 19CW3034, is pending. Table 2: South System Wells Well Name Case No. Approp. Date Adjud. Date Tot. Amt. (cfs) Amt. Abs. (cfs) Amt. Cond. (cfs) Permit No. Maryvale Well No. 1 99CW313 11/17/1999 12/31/2002 0.5 0.18 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.31 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.5 (other uses) 82996-F Maryvale Well No. 2 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 Maryvale Well No. 3 99CW313 2/24/1986 12/31/2002 0.5 0.00 0.5 9 Maryvale Well No. 4 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.09 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.47 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83256-F Maryvale Well No. 5 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.29 (dom., irrig., comm.) 0.27 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83257-F Maryvale Well No. 7 00CW294 4/6/1999 12/31/2002 0.56 0.19 (dom., irrig., comm.) .37 (dom., irrig., comm.); 0.56 (mun., fire prot.) 83258-F iii. Surface Water Rights (1) Cozens Ditch The Cozens Ditch water right was decreed on August 1, 1906 in Civil Action No. 112, Grand County District Court in the amount of 3.125 cfs from Vasquez Creek for irrigation. Historically, the Cozens Ditch Water Right was diverted from May through August for the irrigation of approximately 125 acres. As mentioned above, the Cozens Ditch water right was changed in Case No. 98CW41 to be used for augmentation purposes under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By the Deed, 1.675 cfs of the Cozens Ditch water right was conveyed to the Town. (2) Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Extension In Case No. 99CW314, on December 31, 2002, the Cozens Ditch Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were adjudicated in the amounts of 3.1 cfs and 1.5 cfs, respectively, for domestic, irrigation, commercial, industrial, stockwatering, fire prot ection, storage in the Detention Reservoirs, and supplemental irrigation of 125 acres. The Cozens Ditch 10 Enlargement and Cozens Ditch Extension water rights were decreed to be used in conjunction with the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. By decree entered on June 16, 2019 in Case No. 18CW3144, 1.76 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Enlargement water right and 1.5 cfs of the Cozens Ditch Extension water right were made partially absolute for irrigation use. iv. Reservoir/Pond Storage (1) Mary’s Pond A main source of augmentation releases for the South System is the Maryvale Reservoir (aka “Mary’s Pond”), which was decreed in Case No. W-462 on April 10, 1972 for 32.58 af for domestic, recreation, irrigation, and fish culture uses. Mary’s Pond was later decreed for augmentation use in Case No. 86CW258 (superseded by the decree in Case No. 98CW041). The Maryvale Augmentation Plan contemplates a 16 af enlargement of Mary’s Pond and storage of water from the Cozens Ditch in Mary’s Pond for augmentation releases. The Town acquired 20 af of the Mary’s Pond storage water right, via the Deed. On September 4, 2015, Rendezvous/Grand Park and the Town entered into a “Grant of Easement and Augmentation Pond Joint Operations Agreement,” which sets forth the parties’ agreement and respective obligations regarding the joint operation of Mary’s Pond. Express provisions of this agreement anticipate that the Town and Grand Park will enter a similar easement and operations agreement relating to operation by the Town of the Detention Ponds on Grand Park, for augmentation use under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. The current active water storage capacity of Mary’s Pond is approximately 14 af. Releases from Mary’s Pond are currently the primary source of augmentation water for out-of- priority depletions associated with operation of the Maryvale Wells. (2) Detention Pond Storage Rights The final decree entered on December 31, 1999 in Case No. 99CW315 adjudicated storage rights for ten detention reservoirs: Maryvale K-1a Reservoir, Maryvale K-1b Reservoir, Maryvale K-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-2 Reservoir, Maryvale J-3 Reservoir, Maryvale E-F Reservoir, MR-1 Reservoir, MR-2 Reservoir, MR-3 Reservoir, and MR-4 Reservoir. The six Maryvale Reservoirs (K-1a, K-1b, K-2, J-2, J-3, and E-F), referred to above as the Detention Reservoirs, are contemplated as augmentation storage sites in the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. Pursuant to the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the Detention Reservoirs will be filled during the summer under the Cozens Ditch water right, and excess consumptive use credits and winter return flow water from the Cozens Ditch will be stored in the reservoirs. In the fall and winter, the Detention Reservoirs will be drawn down in order to replace winter stream depletions. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed conditional for irrigation, aesthetic, piscatorial, recreation, municipal, commercial, industrial, and for augmentation and exchange. The Detention Reservoirs are decreed in the cumulative amount of 36 af: K-1a (7.0 af); K-1b (5.0 af); K-2 (10.0 af); J-2 (2.0 af); J-3 (6.0 af); and E-F (6.0 af). Three of the Detention Reservoirs, K-1a, K-1b, and K-2, have been constructed, filled, and put to beneficial use in the following amounts: K-1a (a series of three reservoirs with a total capacity of 3.43 af) and K-1b and K-2 (one combined reservoir with a total capacity of 13.6 af). 11 These three reservoirs are currently operated by Grand Park, but will be operated for augmentation purposes by the Town in the future. The three constructed reservoirs are located in different configurations than originally decreed, and are more than 200 feet from their decreed locations. The decree issued in Case No 08CW194 states: “[p]rior to making any of the subject conditional water rights absolute, Applicants or their successors shall obtain a decree confirming a change of location for any structure that is located at the originally decreed location.” Thus, Grand Park/Rendezvous will need to file an application for change of water rights to reconcile the as-built locations of the reservoirs with the decreed locations before seeking to make the water rights absolute. The Deed conveyed to Fraser 32.7 af of storage capacity in the Detention Reservoirs required for operation of the Maryvale Augmentation Plan. C. Other Water Rights i. Decreed Exchanges (1) Middle Park Windy Gap Exchange In Case No. 85CW337, on October 2, 1989, a conditional right of exchange was approved to allow the exchange of Windy Gap water from Granby Reservoir to the nine Fraser Wells, which are the decreed “exchange to” locations. The exchange is decreed for 25 af, conditional. No separate uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for the Fraser Wells (i.e., irrigation, domestic, industrial, and all other municipal purposes). The exchange allows diversion from the Fraser Wells, via exchange, when the water rights associated with the Fraser Wells may not otherwise be in priority. (2) Middle Park Exchange In Case No. 90CW235, on June 8, 1995, a conditional right of appropriative exchange was decreed for 80 af. The decreed exchange contemplates the exchange of Middle Park water from Granby Reservoir to various “exchange to” locations that include Fraser Well Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, the Gaskill Ditch, Wells RM-5, RM-6, and RM-7, Detention Reservoirs K-1a, K-1b, K-2, J- 2, J-3, E-F, and Mary’s Pond. Sixty-five af is currently leased to Rendezvous/Grand Park. No separate independent uses were decreed; rather, the uses are those already approved for each “exchange to” structure. II. Physical Water Demands and Physical Supply A. Current Water Supply Demand for the North System i. Indoor Use and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water per EQR The North System supplies water generally to the “Old Town” Fraser area, and Byers Peak Ranch (pursuant to an out-of-town service agreement) and, temporarily, a portion of the Grand Park development. Table 3 is a current demand table, and includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volume demand estimates for the geographic areas currently served by the North System. 12 In this analysis, Old Town Fraser’s and Byers Peak Ranch’s annual demand per EQR are assumed to be the same. This demand is based on an assumption of 275 gallons per day per EQR. Indoor average annual demand estimate for these areas is 0.308 af/ EQR. Irrigation demand estimates are based on previous Brown & Caldwell water supply planning work for the Town. In the Fraser area, the irrigation season varies from year to year based on monthly temperatures during the “shoulder months” of the irrigation season. The irrigation season is generally considered to begin in May and end in September. Outdoor annual demand for the Old Town Fraser’s and Byers Peak Ranch areas is based on a 500 square foot lawn per EQR and an irrigation application rate of 1.01 af per acre (“ac”). These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.012 af/ EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.320 af/ EQR. The Grand Park indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/ EQR. This value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree in Case No. 98CW41 (which is converted from EQRs as defined in that decree). The irrigation season as defined by the 98CW41 decree is May through September. The Grand Park outdoor annual demand is based on a 250 square foot lawn per EQR with an irrigation application requirement of 1.387 af per ac. These irrigation demand values result in an annual irrigation demand of 0.008 af/EQR. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 af/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The North System currently serves a total of 962 EQRs, 184 of which are located in in Grand Park. Based on these values and the “af/EQR” values above, the current Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch annual indoor demand is 239.8 af/yr, and the current irrigation demand is 9.0 af/yr. For the Grand Park area currently served by the North System, the current annual indoor demand is 56.7 af/yr and the current irrigation demands is 1.5 af/yr. Thus, the total current North System indoor demand is 296.6 af/yr and the total current irrigation demand is 10.5 af/yr. The total current North System demand is 307.0 af/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The max day demand is a gpm water delivery rate and is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells, or future surface sources, which supply the North System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Max day demand during the irrigation season is 0.312 gpm per EQR. Current max day demand for the 778 EQRs in the Old Town Fraser and Byers Peak Ranch areas is 242.9 gpm. Current max day demand for the 184 EQRs located in the Grand Park area currently served by the North System is 56.0 gpm. Thus, the total current max day demand for the North System is 298.8 gpm. B. Current Water Supply Demand for the South System i. Indoor and Irrigation Annual Volumes of Water Per EQR The Town’s South System supplies water to Rendezvous and Grand Park which comprise a geographic area located within the Town’s municipal boundaries. Table 4 is a current demand table and it includes indoor and outdoor average and max day demands per EQR, total indoor and outdoor max day demands, and indoor and outdoor annual volumes of water currently required for the areas served by the South System. The South System indoor average annual demand is 0.308 af/EQR. This value is taken from the Maryvale Augmentation 13 Plan decree issued in Case No. 98CW41. This decree also indicates that for purposes of operating the Maryvale Augmentation Plan, the irrigation season is May through September and the irrigation demand value is 0.008 af/EQR. The outdoor annual demand in the decree is based on 250 square feet of lawn per EQR and 1.387 af/ac/yr. The indoor and outdoor annual demands sum to 0.316 af/EQR. ii. Average Annual Demand and EQRs The South system currently serves 465 EQRs. Based on these values and the “af/EQR” values above, the current annual indoor demand is 143.3 af/yr and the current annual irrigation demand is 3.7 af/yr. These values result in a current annual demand for the South System of 147.0 af/yr. iii. Max Day Demands The South System max day demand values are derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The average day indoor demand from the decree is 0.191 gpm/EQR and the average day irrigation demand is 0.012 gpm/EQR. The total average day demand is 0.203 gpm/EQR. The max day demand is estimated at 1.5 times the average day demand. The wells supplying the South System must be capable of delivering the max day water supply demand. Max hour demands are supplied through water system tank storage. Based on the irrigation season average day values and the 1.5 max day factor, the max day indoor demand for the South System is 0.286 gpm/EQR. Based on the current 465 EQR total, the current South System max day demand is 141.4 gpm. C. Current Water Supply for the North System i. Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield The North System’s current water supply is from Fraser River alluvial wells. Table 5 identifies the Fraser Wells and their current average pumping rates during two periods, (1) spring and summer and (2) winter. The Fraser Well locations are shown on Figure 3. The spring and summer wellfield pumping total is 735 gpm and the winter wellfield pumping total is 458 gpm. The difference is due to two wells (3b and 9) being utilized/available seasonally. Table 5 Fraser Wells and Pumping Rates Well Spring & Summer Pumping Rates (gpm) Winter Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 120 120 2 78 78 14 3b 70 0 5 125 125 7 70 70 8 65 65 9 207 0 Total 735 458 The concept of “safe yield” with respect to the Fraser Well’s includes wellfield production planning, such that the wells are capable of meeting Fraser’s max day demand. One aspect of wellfield planning to achieve this goal is to have an installed wellfield capacity that exceeds the current max day demand. The current safe yield plan is that the Fraser Wells will be equipped with a total production capacity that is 100 gpm greater than the current max day demand. The additional, safe yield, 100 gpm wellfield production capacity allows for well and well equipment maintenance and repairs such that the North System will be able to meet max day demand when one well is not operational. As previously discussed, the current production capacity of the Fraser Wells is 735 gpm in the spring and summer, and 458 gpm in the winter. Table 3 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 399 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Fraser Wells can meet the current max day safe yield demand. In the future, the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System will be served by the South System. When this transition occurs, the Fraser Wells will obtain an additional 58.2 gpm of capacity to meet demands on the North System. This capacity, and additional wellfield improvements, will be required to meet development demands as projected into the future. ii. Fraser Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The North System currently relies on seven wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed within the Fraser River alluvium. Table 6 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Fraser Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State’s well permit files, HRS report files, and information from the Town staff. The table includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and recent water level data which was used to estimate saturated aquifer thickness. Static water level data was provided by Town staff for each of the active wells. These water levels were calculated based on measured water depth above the pressure transducer and an assumed transducer depth setting near the pump intake. D. Current Water Supply for the South System i. Production Wells, Pumping Rates, and Safe Yield 15 The current water supply for the South System is from the Maryvale Well, which are completed in the Troublesome Formations. Table 7 lists the Maryvale Wells and their current pumping rates. The Maryvale Wells are numbered 1, 4, 5, and 7. The Maryvale Well locations are shown on Figure 4. As noted in the comments column on Table 8, Well No. 6 is permitted only as a monitoring well. Table 7 Maryvale Wells and Pumping Rates Well Pumping Rate (gpm) 1 87 4 43 5 134 7 85 Total 349 The current combined production capacity of the Maryvale Wells is 349 gpm. Table 4 includes a current max day safe yield demand of 241.4 gpm. These values demonstrate that the Maryvale Wells are capable of meeting the current max day safe yield demand. When the 184 Grand Park EQRs currently served by the North System, are permanently transitioned to the South System, the South System’s safe yield max day demand will be 299.6 gpm (141.4 gpm + 58.2 gpm + 100 gpm). The current combined pumping capacity of 349 gpm for the Maryvale Wells will be sufficient to meet this demand. ii. Maryvale Well Construction, Equipping, and Hydrogeologic Parameter Data The South System currently relies on four active wells to meet its daily water demands. Each of these wells was constructed in the Troublesome Formation which underlies the Fraser River alluvium. Table 8 provides an overview of the hydrogeologic, construction, and equipping details for each of the Maryvale Wells (both active and inactive wells). This table was developed using available information from the State’s well permit files, HRS report files and information from the Town staff. Table 8 also includes detailed information related to well construction, pump installation, tested and current pumping rates, and static water level data which was used to estimate the saturated thickness of the aquifer. Static water level data were taken from well construction reports for each well, as water levels in these wells are not monitored by Town staff. E. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQRs for the North System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the North System 16 The estimated total number of EQRs at buildout for the North System is 4,863 EQRs. The following EQRs are included in the buildout estimate: Old Town Fraser, Byers Peak Ranch, and possible future annexations. Using these categories, the total number of projected, future EQRs is: Old Town Fraser – 1,530 EQRs, Byers Peak Ranch – 1,233 EQRs, and future annexations - 2,100 EQRs. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Table 9 provides the annual volume of water required at buildout for each of the areas listed above. The values shown in Table 9 include: Old Town Fraser 489.4 af/yr, Byers Peak Ranch 394.4 af/yr, and future annexation - 671.7 af/yr. The total annual buildout demand is 1,555.5 af/yr. The values on Table 9 show that the annual irrigation volumes required at buildout are small percentages of the total annual demand. iii. Max Day Demands Table 9 also provides max day and safe yield max day demand estimates in EQRs intervals by area. Safe yield max day demand values are obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 1,577 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 1,677 gpm. The EQR estimates and their corresponding safe yield max day demand pumping rates will be used to help determine and plan for future wells, water supply infrastructure, and water rights acquisitions/strategies that will be required to meet the future North System safe yield max day demands over time. The purpose of Table 10 is to track Fraser wellfield installation, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future North System demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. F. Buildout Water Supply Demand by EQR for the South System i. Develop Build Out Demand Values by EQR for the South System The estimated number of EQRs at buildout for the Rendezvous and Grand Park areas, served by the South System, is 2,822 EQRs. This total EQR value is derived from the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree. The 2,822 EQR total includes the 184 EQRs currently served by the North System, and 91 EQRs contemplated under the Maryvale Augmentation Plan decree to be served by small capacity wells. Currently none of the 91 small capacity wells have been constructed and it is not likely any of these wells will be constructed. ii. Average Annual Indoor and Irrigation Demands Including Open Space Irrigation With a total EQR estimate of 2,822 EQRs, and an annual value of 0.316 af/EQR, the total annual demand estimate for the South System is 892.4 af/yr. Of this total, 869.0 af/yr is for indoor demand and 23.4 af/yr is outdoor irrigation demand. iii. Max Day Indoor and Irrigation Demands The total max day demand estimate during the irrigation season for 2,822 EQRs under the South System is 858.2 gpm. This value is based on an indoor max day value of 0.286 gpm/EQR and an outdoor irrigation demand of 0.018 gpm/EQR. Table 11 provides demand 17 estimates in EQR intervals of approximately 200 EQRs. Safe yield max day demand values were obtained by adding 100 gpm to the build out max day demand. The total max day demand of 858.2 gpm becomes a safe yield demand of 958.2 gpm. The EQR estimates included in Table 11 will be used to help determine and plan for the future wells and water supplies infrastructure that will be required to meet the future demand to be served by the South System. The purpose of Table 12 is to track installation of additional Maryvale Wells, equipping, and maintenance work that will be required to meet future wellfield demands. When additional wellfield pumping is required to meet demands, a description of the well work to be performed and a cost estimate for the work will be entered into the spreadsheet. CONCLUSION Current and future water demand and supplies for Fraser’s North and South Systems are discussed and quantified above in the Physical Water Demands and Supply section of this report. Significant conclusions and recommendations from the above discussions and work performed include the following: 1. Fraser’s North and South System wellfields have the capacity to meet current safe-yield max day demands. The Future Demand to Buildout tables and spreadsheets (see Tables 9 through 12) for the North and South Systems are based on incremental EQR increases. The spreadsheets should be used in the Town’s water supply planning to understand the max day water supply requirements of additional EQRs on the Town’s water supply systems. 2. The Town should continue to promote and support water conservation, particularly during the irrigation season. 3. Water supplies for additional development beyond the current demands should be in place at least three months before the water is needed. This recommendation may require that water supply development work begin no later than two years before the water may be needed. 4. If Water Court applications are required to obtain new water rights or to change the Town’s current water rights, this work should begin no later than three years before the water is needed. 5. The Town should continue to monitor and record all well pumping and water level data (both static and pumping levels). 6. Regular review of the water well production and water level data will be important to determine when pumping equipment and well maintenance should be performed. Pumping equipment should be removed from wells and inspected at approximately five-year intervals. At this time a video survey of the well should be performed and appropriate well rehabilitation work completed. 7. The onsite water supply potential should be evaluated for any new annexation area. 18 8. The Town’s current augmentation storage is sufficient for its current water supply demand. Additional augmentation storage will be necessary to meet future legal and physical water supply requirements. 9. Accounting for both the North and South Systems should continue to be updated on a monthly basis, and the Town should continue to work with the Colorado Department of Water Resources staff with respect to water rights accounting matters. 10. The Town’s St. Louis Creek and Elk Creek surface water rights continue to be important components of the Town’s future water supplies and planning efforts. 11. The Town should continue to evaluate possible water rights/storage acquisitions that may arise in the future, to provide additional certainty and protection against increasing demands and changing legal and climatological circumstances. 12. The Town should continue incrementally perfecting its conditional water rights through the diligence and Water Court process. The Town should vigilantly protect its legal water supplies by monitoring and prudently participating in Water Court proceedings potentially impacting the Town’s water rights. 13. The Town should continue to be an active participant in all existing and future water related agreements with third-parties, and proactively steer its water supply development activities to maximize the benefits of those agreements (e.g., the Clinton Reservoir-Fraser River Water Agreement, the Colorado River Cooperative Agreement). WATER EFFICIENCY PLAN TOWN OF FRASER January 2023 Prepared by Merrick and Company DRAFT RECEPTION#: 2017004241, 06/05/2017 at 01:57:24 PM, 1 OF 7s, R $83.00, Additional Names Fee: Doc Code:AGR Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk, Colorado TOWN OF FRASER WATER & WASTEWATER SERVICE AGREEMENT BYERS PEAK PROPERTIES, aEdI PROPERTIES, LLC; C. CLARK LIPSCOMB MEREDITHLIPSCOMB The parties to this Water and Wastewater Service Agreement (this "Agreement") are the TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado ("Fraser" or "Town"), and BYERS PEAK PROPERTIES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, BYERS PEAK DOWNHILL PROPERTIES, LLC, a Coloradolimitedliabilitycompany, and C. CLARK LIPSCOMB and MEREDITH C. LIPSCOMB collectively "Developer"). RECITALS A. Fraser is a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of Colorado. Developer is comprised of two limited liability companies organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado and two individuals; B. Developer owns property it intends to develop, referred generally as Byers Peak RanchandtheLipscombproperty, more specifically described in Exhibit A (referred to herein as "the Property"). Developer intends to develop 1,233 Single Family Equivalent units SFE") for the Property, which is located outside the Town's current boundaries; and C. The Town is authorized to provide water and wastewater service outside the § 3' s corporate boundaries pursuant to Colorado law, C.R.S.§ 31-35-402 (2013), R 35-512 (2013), and the Town currently provides out-of-town water and wastewater service; and D. The Fraser Board of Trustees has had the opportunity to review with Town Staff andlegalcounseltheproposedextensionofwaterandwastewaterservicestotheProperty, and the Board finds that this Agreement with Developer for out-of-town water and wastewater service is in the best interest of the Town; and E. Developer plans to develop the Property in several phases, by recording of successive final plats, and this Agreement will apply to the extension of all water and wastewater service to such approved plats; and F The water and wastewater service for the Property will require the design, planning, permitting, construction, and installation of water and wastewater lines to be built atDeveloper's cost to connect the Property to Fraser's water and wastewater infrastructure; and G. The Town agrees to provide Developer water and wastewater utility service pursuant to the terms of the Fraser Municipal Code ("Code") and pursuant to the terms and conditions specifically outlined in this agreement; and out_of Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 2 of 12 H. This Agreement shall become effeand udontion of a Resolution by the Fraser execut on hereof by the appropriate Board of Trustees approving its executionpFraserofficialandbyauthorizedagentsoftheDeveloper. The date of the latest of such conditions to occur is referred to as the "Effective Date". NOW 'THEREFORE, for and in consideration offered and accept d,lthereceipt and adequacy mises and covenants herein contained, and for the other considerationofwhichisherebyacknowledged, the Town and Developer agree as follows: POTABLE WATER SERVICE l . Water Service. Upon approval of this Agreement, ialh plat developments on s to the Properly vide treated municipal water service to Developer for its approvedthe Code, and all other applicable laws, subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, rules and regulations under local, stat and evedloral law. ment will ot exceed 1,233 SFE. ile the Developer anticipates Unless planning multiple phases, in total the fin pprovisions noted below, such otherwise approved by Fraser in writing, and under cost recovery p water service shall be limited to use by Developer on the Property. a. Demand Limit and Town Ca aci The Town agrees to provide Developer sufficient water per SFE, to meet Developers water demands for up to 1,233 SFEs, as such supplyisdescribedbytheCode. Fraser's Water Rights are reasonably adequate to supportthepotablemunicipalwaterserviceforexistingtownusers, future development and the SFEs on the Property, subject ° terms Frasersnd shall conditionslresponsib forth forreall Except as otherwise provided herein, applicable implementation, operation and accounting requirements necessary to serve the Property with sufficient water as provided by the Code. pay 2, Water Plant Investment Fees. Developr and totheorwn w ter 1 einvestment feeerty l ate Fraser's water plant investment fees at a ratequalchargedbyFraserforin -town property owners and governed by the Code at the time ofissuanceof connection. The water plant investment fee shallana investmentfeefee must be paid inper SFE prior to fullprior to a building permit by the County. Each water p approvals shall Fraser delivering water to the SFE at issue. The Developer agrees that its County include a requirement that a landowner demonstrate ita idlPapplication Investment for unty rev ewrunleasersrthe to the County accepting a landowners building p pp permit in landowner has an alternative means ofproviding water service for the building p question in accordance with Sectio 3. Water Service Fees. Developer and other future owners - town er service fee rate charged generally water service fees at a rate equal to 1.1 times by Fraser on a quarterly or other periodic basis and gby theoverned means ander its Code or other ater service fees are not timely paid, Developer agrees that F Y use state or local law, including discontinuing service individual Fraser shall connection, have the right to certify payments. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, 6/ Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 3 of 12 delinquent service fees and related charges to the County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as taxes, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-20-105. Developer agrees to include such details in any property owner association covenants. 4. Raw Water Irri ation. Developer may install, at Developer's sole cost and expense, a non -potable irrigation system to irrigate all areas on the Property. No Fraser water or water connections shall be used for such raw water irrigation. However, water supply for fue hydrants and public drinking fountains may be made in compliance with the Code. Irrigation with Fraser's potable water shall be limited as required under the Code, and this restriction shall be noted by Developer in any property owner association covenants. 5. Future Water Right Cases. The Developer agrees not to oppose any water rights application filed by Fraser for the purpose of findings of reasonable diligence, making absolute Fraser's conditional water rights inventory. In addition, Fraser agrees that it will not file opposition to future diligence cases or cases to make conditional water rights absolute for conditional water rights owned by Developer. Developer shall not pursue an independent water system except as provided in Section 9, below. WASTEWATER SERVICE 6. Wastewater Service. Upon approval of this Agreement, Fraser will provide municipal wastewater/sanitary sewer service to the Property to serve final plats adopted by Grand County, up to a maximum of 1,233 SFE, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and the applicable provisions of the Code. 7. Wastewater Plant Investment Fees. Developer and other future owners of the Property shall pay Fraser's sanitary sewer plant investment fees (also referred to as wastewater plantinvestmentfees) at a rate equal to the in -town sanitary sewer plant investment fee rate charged generally by Fraser and governed by the Code for in -town waste water users at the time of connection. The wastewater plant investment fee shall be paid in full per SFE prior to the issuance of a building permit by the County. Each wastewater plant investment fee must be paid in full prior to Fraser connecting its sewer service to the SFE at issue. The Developer agrees that its County approvals shall include a requirement that a landowner demonstrate a paid Plant Investment Fee in Fraser prior to the County accepting a landowner's building permit application for County review unless the landowner has an alternative means of providing sewer service for the building permit in question in accordance with Section 9 hereof. S. Wastewater Service Fees. Developer and other future owners of the Property shall pay Fraser's sanitary sewer service fees (also referred to as wastewater service fees) at a rate equal to 1.1 times the in -town sanitary sewer service fee rate charged by Fraser on a quarterly or other periodic basis and governed by the Code. If wastewater service fees are not timely paid, Developer agrees that Fraser may use any means under its Code or other state or local law, including discontinuing service to the individual connection, to enforce timely payments. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Fraser shall have the right to certify delinquent service fees and related charges to the County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as VA Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 4 of 12 taxes, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-20-105. Developer agrees to include such details in any property owner association covenants. TERMS APPLICABLE TO BOTH WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE 9. Alternative Water and Sewer Service. Developer agrees that the Fraser water and wastewater services to be provided under the terms of this Agreement will be utilized for all or substantially all of the future development on the Property, provided that Developer may elect to have certain large -lot development served by wells and septic systems, in accordance with Grand County requirements, where it would be unfeasible or uneconomical to use Fraser's central water and wastewater services. If any such large -lot development is proposed, Fraser will be provided the proposed preliminary and final plats, including any plans for wells and septic systems, and Fraser may consult with the Developer and Grand County regarding such plans, but Fraser shall not oppose or withhold Fraser's approval of such plans unreasonably. It is further agreed that nothing contained herein shall require Developer to discontinue use of any alternative water and/or sewer facilities serving any part of the Property as of the effective date of this Agreement, and Developer shall only develop the municipal and domestic water sources for which water rights and approvals are being sought in Case Nos. 14CW3097 and 14CW3098 in the event Fraser is unwilling, unable, or is in breach of its obligations to provide potable municipal water service under Section 1, above. 10. Mill Levy Equivalent Surchar e. As provided in the Code, if Fraser subsequently imposes a property tax mill levy for water and/or sewer improvements or operations, a surcharge shall be added to the water and/or wastewater service fees payable pursuant to this Agreement to account for such mill levy. The surcharge will be in an amount determined by the Fraser Board of Trustees, and certified and communicated in writing to the Property Owners not less than 90 days prior to enacting such surcharge. Fraser agrees that such surcharge shall not exceed the same or approximately the same amounts as a Fraser resident would pay if the Property was subject to such mill levy and shall only apply to property being served by Fraser. 11. Fraser Plant Investment and Service Fee Allocations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Fraser may adjust the total combined water and sewer plant investment fee and/or service fees to disproportionately allocate more of the fee to its water fund or sewer fund so long as the aggregate fee of the combined water and sewer fees does not exceed the rates set forth above. 12. Review of Plans. Developer agrees that all subdivision plats and plans submitted to the County for the Property shall also be submitted to Fraser for review and comment, as to water and wastewater connections to the municipal systems. Developer agrees to reimburse Fraser for all costs, including consultant fees, incurred for review of the design plans for water and wastewater facilities submitted pursuant to Section 13 hereof, and for inspections of facilities constructed pursuant to such plans and designs. Payment of such reimbursement shall be due within thirty (30) days after billing by Fraser. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et aL Page 5 of 12 13. Connection to Fraser's Water and Wastewater Facilities. a. Design for Connection. Developer shall provide design and engineering information for the water main line connections and/or wastewater main line connections and all related facilities and easements to Fraser not less than 60 days prior to construction for Fraser's approval by not later than the 60 day period, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided that connections shall be made at locations that will minimize the immediate and foreseeable costs to Fraser. Such designs and plans shall be in compliance with the Grand County development approvals. The parties agree that all design and construction shall also be in compliance with Town water and sanitary sewer standards and sizes and installation requirements, as governed by the Code and Town regulations. Developer shall be required to execute an improvement agreement in the form customarily used by Fraser for subdivision development, with security as provided by the Code for the water and sanitary sewer improvements on or before the final plat recording for any final plat. Developer may commence construction of water lines and wastewater lines upon approval of the construction plans by Fraser's engineer. There shall be no connection made to Fraser's then existing system until the required easements for such lines are secured and demonstrated to Fraser (and compliance with other terms of this Agreement and requirements of the Code). b. Connection Costs. Developer shall be solely responsible for all costs, materials, labor and fees required to construct water main lines on and off the Property including, if necessary to serve the demands of Developer, any upsizing to connect to Fraser's water main lines, and for constructing wastewater main lines on and off the Property including, if necessary to serve the demands of Developer, any upsizing to connect to Fraser's wastewater main lines, including Town inspection charges. The Plant Investment Fees, referenced above, constitute Fraser's revenue source for all other off-site water and wastewater infrastructure that may be needed to provide water and wastewater service to the Property, including but not limited to, additional capacity, wells, water treatment plants, water storage, and water tanks. c. On -Site Improvements; Inspections and Fees. Developer shall install all water and wastewater main lines, service lines and stub -outs, meters and necessary improvements and facilities upon the Property at its sole cost and expense, including provision of all insurance, without any reimbursement from the Town. Such water and wastewater service lines and connections, including water metering, shall be subject to all requirements of the Code and other regulations generally applicable in Fraser, including but not limited to required inspections and requirements for installation and testing of backflow prevention devices. d. Easements. All required easements for water and wastewater lines, both on-site and off- site of the Property required to serve the Property shall be obtained by Developer, and proof of such easements shall be provided to Fraser prior to connecting such lines to Fraser's then existing system. Such easement agreements shall be in the customary and I / Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 6 of 12 usual form required by Fraser for water and wastewater service lines and infrastructure, and shall be obtained and finalized at Developer's sole cost. e. Ownership. The requirements of the Code for preliminary acceptance by Fraser of any water main lines, wastewater main lines, or other required improvements shall be met prior to Fraser providing service to any of the lines or required improvements. Developer shall convey all water and wastewater main lines, related infrastructure and easements as required by the Code, upon approved preliminary acceptance of such lines. i. Outside Connections. Developer agrees that it will not allow any water or wastewater users, other than landowners within the approved County final plats for the Property, to access any water or wastewater main lines, any water or wastewater improvements, or service without written consent from the Town. If users that are outside of the Property seek to connect to the lines, they will either be required to enter an out of town service agreement with Fraser, or annex to the Town, with such option at Fraser's sole election. To the extent the Town determines that other users may connect to the Developer's water service or wastewater service Iines, Developer is not obligated to provide any additional easements and shall be entitled to cost recovery based upon pro rata usage or some other equitable formula as agreed to by the parties, in accordance with the provisions of Section 15 hereof. 14. Infrastructure Construction, Conveyance and Warranty. Developer agrees to conform to the development standards in the applicable provisions of the Code with regard to infrastructure construction and acceptance related to water and wastewater service. For a period of one year after dedication and acceptance of all of the required improvements to the Town, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, Developer shall warrant the construction, installation and survivability of the required improvements to the standards required by the Code. At Developer's sole cost and expense, Developer agrees to make all needed and necessary repairs and replacements required for Code compliance, including but not Iimited to, defective materials, design or workmanship, breach of contract, failure to abide by approved plans or standards, but not associated with ordinary and normal wear and tear. Developer agrees that notice of completion, all inspections and warranty notice timing shall be as dictated by the Code and Fraser's regulations. 15. Developer is only responsible for costs associated with on-site water and wastewater main lines that are reasonably required to service the Property. If Fraser requests that the water or wastewater main lines be constructed by Developer with extensions or excess capacity to serve property not within the Property, Fraser shall notify the Developer in writing. The parties shall enter into a supplemental written agreement to confirm the details and the additional costs of the proposed extension or excess capacity and the terms of reimbursement of the additional costs to Developer by Fraser or the other property to be served. Fraser agrees it shall not extend lines paid for by Developer to another property without such supplemental written agreement in place. Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for on-site water and wastewater infrastructure and easements pursuant to such a supplemental agreement. I / Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 7 of 12 16. Annexation, Termination. In the event all or any portion of the Property is subsequently annexed to the Town, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated as to any annexed property and such property shall thereafter be subject to the provisions of the Code with respect to the provision of municipal water and sewer service, including the rates payable for such service. 17. No Guarantee of Qual4, Quantityor Pressure. The Town's agreement to provide water and wastewater service pursuant to this Agreement does not constitute a guarantee that such service will be of a certain quality or that it will not be subject to periodic interruption due to natural or other causes beyond Fraser's control. Fraser shall not be liable for any such conditions affecting the water or wastewater service hereunder, except as provided by and to the extent allowed under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. 24-10-101 et seq. or any successor statute. 18. Enforcement and Application of Town Code. Time is of the essence hereof. The parties recognize and agree that the Town has the right to enforce its rules, policies, regulations, Code provisions for the extension and use of Fraser's potable water and Fraser wastewater collection and treatment for any units served by Fraser's potable water and Fraser's wastewater system. Without Iimiting the foregoing, Developer agrees that the Town may also enforce any violation of the Town's rules, policies, regulations, ordinances, or Code provisions relating to the water and wastewater service and the terms of this Agreement by mandatory or prohibitory injunction or specific performance as allowed by Colorado law. The Town agrees that Developer may similarly enforce the terms of this Agreement as allowed by Colorado law. The parties agree that no term hereof shall be materially amended, changed or frustrated by any subsequent change in the Town Code. 19. Public UtiliV Status. The parties agree that for purposes of this out-of-town service, the Town is not a public utility for water and wastewater service compelled to serve other properties, or subject to review by Colorado's Public Utility Commission. To the extent allowed by law, Developer agrees that neither it, nor its successors in interest or assigns shall at any time petition the Colorado courts, the Board of County Commissioners of Grand County, the Town, or the Public Utilities Commission or any other governmental entities to require service to any property or to acquire jurisdiction over the water treatment and distribution systems or wastewater collection and treatment systems of the Town. 20. No Waiver. Failure of a party hereto to exercise any right hereunder shall not be deemed a waiver of any such right and shall not affect the right of such party to exercise at some future time said right or any other right it may have hereunder. 21. Notices. All notices required to be given shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid, properly addressed to the person or entity to whom directed at the address shown herein, or at such other address as shall be given by notice pursuant to this paragraph: Town of Fraser: With copy to; Fraser Town Manager Rodney R. McGowan, Esq. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 8 of 12 P.O. Box 370 153 Fraser Avenue Fraser, CO 80442 Developer: Byers Peak Properties, LLC Byers Peak Downhill Properties, LLC C. Clark Lipscomb & Meredith C. Lipscomb P.O. Box 30 Winter Park, CO 80482 Attn: Clark Lipscomb clark@cstoneholdings. com Cazier & McGowan P.O. BOX 500 Granby, CO 80446 rod@mcgowan-pc.com With copy to: Kevin L. Patrick, Esq. PatricklMillerl Nato P.C. 229 Midland Avenue Basalt, CO 81621 patrick@waterlaw.com 22. Force Majeure. No party shall be held liable for a failure to perform hereunder due to wars, strikes, acts of God, natural disasters, floods, drought or other similar occurrences outside of the control of that party. 23. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement shall be or become invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each and every provision shall be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 24. Amendment. Except as expressly provided for herein to the contrary, this Water and Wastewater Service Agreement may not be amended, except by subsequent written agreement of the parties. 25. Indemnity. Developer shall indemnify and hold the Town harmless from any liability for events or occurrences arising from the Town entering this Agreement and/or providing water or wastewater service to Developer, except where such liability arises due to the negligence or willful misconduct of the Town. To the extent permitted by law, the Town shall indemnify and hold Developer harmless form any liability for events or occurrences arising from the Developer entering this Agreement and/or providing water or wastewater service to the Property, except where such liability arises due to the negligent or willful misconduct of the Developer. Nothing contained herein, however, shall constitute or result in any waiver or diminishment of and defense or limitation available to the Town under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act or other applicable law. 26. Attorney Fees. In the event of any litigation between the Town and Developer relating to this Agreement, the court shall award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs incurred in connection with such litigation, including attorney fees. 27. Subject to Annual Apropriation. This Agreement is not intended to create a debt or other multiple -fiscal year financial obligation of Fraser, and any financial obligations of Fraser hereunder are subject to annual appropriation in accordance with Article X, § 20 of the Colorado Constitution and other Colorado law. Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et at Page 9of12 28. Other Commitments. a. Upon execution of this Agreement, Developer agrees to cause its affiliate, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC, to abandon and promptly (within 60 days) file a written withdrawal of its application with the Town for a permit to construct a wastewater treatment plant on the property described as Lot 2, Meyer Subdivision, and Cornerstone and Town shall direct their respective counsel to file a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice in Grand County district Court Case No. 2015 CV 30126, with each party to pay their own costs and attorney fees. b. Within 60 days after execution of this Agreement, Developer shall cause its affiliates, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC and/or Grand Park Development LLC, to execute and deliver to Fraser a good and sufficient special warranty deed conveying a parcel containing approximately four 4 acres, known as Planning Area 6W, as described in the Grand Park Planned Development District Plan recorded on November S, 2005 in the real property records of the Clerk and Recorder of Grand County as Reception No. 2005-012709, as amended, and as provided in the Amended and Restated Annexation Agreement for the Rendezvous Property, dated June 4, 2003 and recorded December 30, 2003 at Reception No. 2003-016733, as amended. Failure of Developer to satisfy these commitments within the time allowed shall be grounds for Fraser to terminate this Agreement, by written notice to Developer. 29. Contractual Obligations. Each of the Developer entities agrees to be jointly and severally obligated under this Agreement to fulfill the responsibilities, obligations and provisions agreed upon by Developer, including without limitation those provisions relating to default and the remedies and cures associated with the same. 30. Assignment. This agreement shall not be assigned by Developer without the written consent of Fraser, and Developer agrees that such consent may be withheld in the event Fraser determines in its reasonable discretion that the proposed successor or assign does not have financial capacity to perform the obligations of Developer herein. 31. Entire Agement. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect hereto and supersedes all prior written and oral agreements and representations of the parties. 32. Authorization. By executing this agreement, the parties acknowledge and represent to one another that all procedures necessary to contract and execute this agreement have been performed and that the person(s) signing for each party have been duly authorized to do so and to bind said party to the terms and conditions hereof. I / Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 10 of 12 33. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in multiple parts as originals or by email or facsimile copies of executed originals; provided however, if executed and evidence of execution is made by electronic copy, then an original shall be provided to the other party(ies) within seven days of receipt of said electronic copy. 34. Recording, Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be recorded in the real property records of the Clerk and Recorder of Grand County, Colorado, and shall constitute constructive notice of this Agreement and all of its individual provisions. The provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants and servitudes which shall burden and run with the land comprising the Property and the burdens and benefits hereof shall bind and inure to the benefit of all estates and interests in the Property and all assigns and successors in interest to the parties hereto; provided, however, that the rights and remedies granted to the Developer hereunder shall be limited to the Developer and its permitted assigns, and such rights and remedies shall not be available to any future purchaser of a lot or parcel included in the Property that is provided water and/or wastewater service hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hand and official seals the day and year first above written. TO OF FRASER, COLORADO By: hilip Vandernail, Mayor 153 Fraser Avenue P.O. Box 370 Fraser, CO 81637 ATTEST: Antoinette McVeigh, Town Clem STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF GRAND } Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of rA ouj V 2017, by Philip Vandernail, as Mayor, and by Antoinette McVeigh, as Town Clerk of the Town of Fraser, Colorado. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: A;: W Notary Public I / I ANTOINETTE MCVEIGH Notary Public - State of Coiorado Notary Ip 20174004888 My Commission Expires Feb 1, 2021 Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et al. Page 11 of 12 STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF GRAND } C. Clark Lipscomb, President As Authorized Agent for and on behalf of C. Clark Linscomb. Presiderd As Author Agent fo and on behalf of Byers ropens C MEREDITH C. LIPSCOMB 0 Subscribed and sworn to before me this2,2 day of 2017, by C. Clark Lipscomb as authorized agent for and on behalf of Byers Peak P operties, LLC and Byers Peak Downhill Properties, LLC. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: Q r. Notary Public SUSAN J. KOENEKE STATE ofCOLORADO W COMSSM ENOTARY ' SI 08+11rf316.2021 Out -of -Town Water Service Agreement Town of Fraser and Byers Peak Properties, et at Page 12 of 12 STATE OF COLORADO ) SS. COUNTY OF GRAND } Subscribed and sworn to before me this,;U' day of 2017, by C. Clark Lipscomb and Meredith Lipscomb, individuals. Witness my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: IF"n'-.4 SU A ARl' O PEKE STATE yO FF COLORADO MY C% SS10 ESENDOWit, 2021 El/ Exhibit A PROPERTY DESCRIPTION — BYERS PEAK RANCH A parcel of land, being Government Lot 3, Government Lot 4 EXCEPT the Westerly 440 feet thereof, and a portion of the south 1/2 of Section 19, and the Nl/2NE1A of Section 30, all in Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6th P.M., Grand County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southeast Corner of said Section 19 and the Northeast Corner of said Section 30, a 3" iron pipe with a 3-%Z" brass cap stamped USGLO 1933; Thence South 00134'13" East along the easterly line of said Section 30 a distance of 1,317.29 feet to the North Sixteenth Comer of Section 29 and said Section 30, whence a leaning 2" iron pipe 1 foot above ground with a 2-'/Z" brass cap stamped LS# 12479" bears North 31°28'41" East 0.51 feet, also whence the East Quarter Corner of said Section 30, a found 2-%2" brass cap stamped "USGLO 1933" bears South 00°34'13" East a distance of 1,317.29 feet; Thence North 89°55'10" West along the North Sixteenth line of said Section 30 a distance of 2,629.96 feet to the North -Center Sixteenth Corner of said Section 30, a set #5 re -bar with a 3-'/4" aluminum cap stamped "LS #24669", whence the Center Quarter Comer of said Section 30, a found #6 aluminum rod with a 2-%2" brass cap stamped "DWD LS #16398, 2001" bears South 00°56'13" East a distance of 1,330.77 feet; Thence North 00°56'13" West along the North-South Centerline of said Section 30 a distance of 1,330.77 feet to the South Quarter Corner of said Section 19, a set 46 re -bar with a 3-%4" aluminum cap stamped "LS #24669" re-established per monument record sheet ties prepared by Thomas M. Carpenter, LS# 16398, dated 8/30/1996; Thence South 89°22'12" West along the southerly line of said Section 19 a distance of 2,181.82 feet to a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669", whence a 1-'/2" aluminum cap stamped "LS# 11415" bears North 52°17'06" East 1.63 feet, also whence the Southwest Corner of said Section 19 bears South 89°22'12" West a distance of 440.00 feet to a found 2" galvanized pipe with a 2-'/Z" brass cap stamped "USGLO 1933"; Thence North 00°14'02" West a distance of 1,322.19 feet to a found 1-%Z" aluminum cap stamped "LS# 11415"; Thence North 54°5949" East a distance of 1,167.79 feet; Thence North 00°09'11" West a distance of 684.98 feet to the northerly right of way line of CR -73 as recorded in Book 95, Page 184; Thence North 89°50'49" East along said right of way a distance of 1,296.54 feet to the westerly Corporate Limit of the Town of Fraser; Thence South 00'14'50" East along said Corporate Limit a distance of 29.94 feet; Thence North 89°48'07" East along said East-West Centerline of Section 19 a distance of 1,303.12 feet to a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669" on the westerly right of way line of the Union Pacific Railroad, whence the East Quarter Comer of said Section 19, a found 2" pipe in concrete with a 2-%" aluminum cap, bears North 89°48'07" East a distance of 1,266.48 feet; Thence along said right of way the following three (3) courses: 1. South 14°40'05" East a distance of 989.32 feet to a point of curvature, a set 5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669"; Exhibit A 2. Along the arc of a curve to the left having a central angle of 59°21'29", a radius of 816.78 feet and an arc length of 846.18 feet (chord bears South 44°20'50" East, 808.84 feet), a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669"; 3. South 74°01'34" East a distance of 415.27 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of CR -72 as recorded in Book 105, Page 278; Thence leaving said Union Pacific Railroad right of way South 04038'38" West and along said easterly right of way line of CR -72 a distance of 98.01 feet; Thence North 89°38'52" West leaving said easterly right of way a distance of 40.11 feet to the westerly right of way line of said CR -72; Thence North 04038'38" East along said westerly right of way line a distance of 97.13 feet to a point of non -tangent curvature on the southerly right of way line of Fraser Valley Parkway (CR -721) as recorded in Book 450, Page 480; Thence leaving said westerly right of way and along said southerly right of way and along the arc of a curve to the right having a central angle of 49°28'57", a radius of 244.97 feet, and an arc length of 211.56 feet (chord bears South 65°35'58" West, 205.05 feet); Thence South 00°20'10" West leaving said southerly right of way a distance of 11.01 feet; Thence North 89°38'52" West a distance of 618.10 feet; Thence South 00°06'05" East a distance of 900.00 feet to a set #5 re -bar with a plastic cap stamped "LS 24669", whence a found 2-%2" iron pipe bears North 25°31'29" West a distance of 5.46 feet; Thence South 89°37'46" East along the southerly line of said Section 19 a distance of 899.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 12,868,892 square feet, or 295.429 acres, more or less. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION — LIPSCOMB PROPERTY A parcel of land, being a portion of the south %2 of Section 19 in Township 1 South, Range 75 West of the 6th P.M., Grand County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the West Quarter corner of said Section 19; Thence North 89°50'49" East along the East-West centerline of said Section 19 a distance of 1,400.23 feet; Thence South 00'09'11" East a distance of 654.98 feet; Thence South 54°59'49" West a distance of 1,167.79 feet to a point on the South Sixteenth line of said Section 19; Thence South 89°36'54" West along said South Sixteenth line a distance of 440.00 feet to the South Sixteenth comer of said Section 19; Thence North 00°14'04" West along the westerly line of said Section 19 a distance of 1,324.08 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1,530,896 square feet or 35.145 acres, more or less. 2 041000? NN1o1 ILP, 1557-10.1-00-004 SEC. 24 T1S, R76W e�n e4.NC w. �N F1/r 1 n'sesxnE .NQ NDOW'711T TpN 6 E.81W SOT OWE I I • hOA >m 1e 1057-IR1-N tlhiJ 1007-110-14 29.94 n e>w rn.Axw�� 02[555 6Neq�ivs x3l 1 I nee-.ir w m. Nao sa.o� ,tea s+' ! YELL ALE (55' 8011) nne `� ao-ist~ ` ! 1400.73'�� _ - - _ ` _ 1e • - - - .c_ M!Y'M 'OTE 12 0.1.1 9 ur w� I" ..`/ - —y ▪ e l �'-� ��e�eew�� v���oeA ..t__ � L OCATLDWQFSECIFMLOTSAND IN THESAWA.S ECTIO N 74 A ND T HE b/ ▪ wmml 1 w 4xe •� NE VA OFSEOTTO NM TONTTgyAP I S OWN, RAN GE 79 WEST OF ���/ i I TAW OMP.IC T ONS OFFRlSER, COO NTYOF GRANO. STATE OF COLORADO. It 1 �/ It �e ^_ CLARK & VERMIN LIPSCO96B ', / / I I 1 11'. e AREA> •35.145 ACRES , �/ I I11I� 2 GOVT LOT .3 P .."0.E /J / I .S/ ' N 1 4 • / 1.2 �I! `■p. R1 JUE7 5.x01 I� j 750.]IZET ST E MINER. CO 5022 @ 1407-143-mb55 I 11F 621. CO E NC WEE 13/0 Nmn N.. 1. m 1-1lC 14 5111115w GOV T LOT 4 w 11u5J7 EERY - SW SEC E /4 19 BYERS PEAK PROPERTIES, LLC AREAM2B0 .479 ACRE S • •• � • HT P. 14 1NO NAN DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 9 w M EM WOO 011521141 0 WORRY mom mn Denver. Coldmo00202 MY N. MN Td: 721450.0969 a =NPR w 734 720-9401E373MEM 05 6 _0.15!7 410 s-1FN En gineers • Surv e)0., • PC®LN3 002 05500-002 I2'1 MEOW 5700 0102 MODE 15®Py 1� TTP NW 1/4 SEC. 30 110 P/R •1NQ5lyp 1445-141-00-1n 1 ti 4 SE P 19 ti MASER Mire 700. 410 ( OR -721) (eV ROSO ;14r M ONEY Mr JEFFR EY !, It FANK J 7.--44.- BYERS PEAK 00NTHOLL PAC. WC AIEA- ,3S ACRES 1 n ow 1 0-1002U44 ®e, Rolm n NENINEN I EC® PER 116 MENE M ET N NW" PR.= 1.60 ION RI•Ma nn n;502 ni P.m0N M411104 NS Nee. IM) ave ' 5a ae r .E�•9i we E7/ mune OP NA HOC NE 1/4 mMe cu m SEC. 30 Me nom ammo 1E11 Nl97O'IO'R 2059.0!' • wen. • .1 44x3136E4 MN OR LAKEWOOD. CO 50234 1555-2 51 J - / N® SUIT EXHI BIT A MA P 1 1101' Mµ 75' 97.13' Nerr3rsr N 40 .11' JAMS O. Wa co 16 0071) 00 00 RAo[x GRANT.SCO ZI NN 1057-10FC0-030 ENE0MAE 7 mworS ERASER METER" -205- 07-501 11 11 1 1 SEC. 20 POINT CFA .BEGINNINGam, RA9l � 7Y4SR AM' xn J-1 i MY SEC. 29 oK J I It •-3/R'E s man 1i".. [i4�Y S April 29, 2015 Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 www.frasercolorado.com TOWN OF ERASER FRASER FIRMING PROJECT STUDY prepared By: JRS Engineering Consultant, LLC HRS Water Consultants, Inc. 6013 E. Briarwood Drive 8888 West 14th Avenue Centennial, CO 80112 Lakewood. CO 80215 Jaynes R. "Jim" Swanson, P.E. Mark R. Palumbo, Principal Hydrologist 303) 725-5577 (343) 462-3030 Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser. CO 86442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www. frase rco (orad o. co m FRASER FIRMING PROJECT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................... 1 SECTION 2. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. 4 2.1 Background.................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Purpose........................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Scope........................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 3. ELK CREEK DITCH No. 2 DIVERSION ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS.. 5 3.1 General........................................................................................................................ 5 3.1.1 Water Rights Considerations................................................................................ 5 3.1.2 Design Criteria...................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Forest Meadows Augmentation Site............................................................................ 7 3.2.1 Site Analysis......................................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Preliminary Design............................................................................................... 11 3.2.2.1 Intake.......................................................................................................... 11 3.2.2.2 Storage....................................................................................................... 13 3.2.2.3 Outfall......................................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Preliminary Environmental................................................................................... 15 3.2.4 Capital Cost Estimate.......................................................................................... 16 3.2.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost............................................................ 16 3.3 Grand Park Planning Area 6W Augmentation Site ...................................................... 16 3.3.1 Site Analysis........................................................................................................ 16 3.3.2 Preliminary Design.............................................................................................. 17 3.3.2.1 Intake.......................................................................................................... 17 3.3.2.2 Storage....................................................................................................... 19 3.3.2.3 Outfall......................................................................................................... 20 3.3.3 Planning Area 6W Augmentation Site Storage Alternative ................................. 21 3.3.3.1 PA 6W Augmentation Site - Alternate 1 ..................................................... 21 3.3.3.2 PA 6W Augmentation Site - Alternate 2 ..................................................... 21 3.3.4 Preliminary Environmental................................................................................... 22 3.3.5 Capital Cost Estimate.......................................................................................... 24 3.3.6 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost............................................................ 24 3.4 Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 Diversion Repair...................................................................... 24 3.4.1 Site Analysis........................................................................................................ 24 3.4.2 Preliminary Design.............................................................................................. 25 3.4.3 Preliminary Environmental................................................................................... 27 3.4.4 Capital Cost Estimate.......................................................................................... 27 3.4.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost............................................................ 28 SECTION 4. ST LOUIS CREEK DIVERSION...................................................................... 29 4.1 General........................................................................................................................ 29 4.1.1 Water Rights Considerations................................................................................ 29 4.1.2 Design Criteria...................................................................................................... 29 4.2 Gaskill Headgate & Flume Repair................................................................................ 29 4.2.1 Site Analysis......................................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Preliminary Design............................................................................................... 30 4.2.3 Preliminary Environmental................................................................................... 30 4.2.4 Capital Cost Estimate.......................................................................................... 30 4.2.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost............................................................ 31 4.3 Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site......................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Site Analysis........................................................................................................ 31 4.3.2 Preliminary Design............................................................................................... 32 4.3.2.1 Intake.......................................................................................................... 32 4.3.2.2 Storage....................................................................................................... 34 4.3.2.3 Outfall......................................................................................................... 34 4.3.3 Preliminary Environmental................................................................................... 35 4.3.4 Capital Cost Estimate.......................................................................................... 36 4.3.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost............................................................ 36 4.4 Potable Treatment of the St. Creek Louis Diversion .................................................... 36 4.4.1 Water Rights Considerations............................................................................... 36 4.4.2 Design Criteria...................................................................................................... 36 4.4.3 Site Analysis - Gold Medal Ranch Water Treatment Facility ................................ 37 4.4.3.1 Preliminary Design..................................................................................... 37 4.4.3.2 Intake........................................................................................................... 37 4.4.3.3 Treatment and Pumping.............................................................................. 39 4.4.4 Site Analysis - Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility ............................... 40 4.4.4.1 Preliminary Design...................................................................................... 40 4.4.4.2 Intake.......................................................................................................... 40 4.4.4.3 Treatment and Pumping... ........................................................................... 42 4.4.5 Environmental...................................................................................................... 43 4.4.6 Capital Cost Estimate........................................................................................... 44 4.4.7 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost............................................................ 44 APPENDICES: Appendix A -- Fraser Decree, Case No. 83CW363 (Water Division No. 5). Appendix B -- Forest Meadows Preliminary Design Information. Appendix C -- Environmental Forms and Requirements. Appendix D -- Grand Park Planning Area 6W - Preliminary Design Information. Appendix E -- Elk Creek Ditch No. 2 - Preliminary Design Information. Appendix F -- Gold Medal Ranch - Preliminary Design Information. Appendix G -- Fraser Civil Action No. 183 and Decree Case No. W-2280 Appendix H -- Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion - Preliminary Design Information EXHIBITS: Exhibit 1 - Project Site Map Exhibit 2 - Forest Meadows Reservoir Location, Case No. 83CW362 Exhibit "A.. ............. Exhibit 3 - Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout ......................... Exhibit 4 - Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir Easements ..................................... Exhibit 5 - Grand Park PA 6W Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout ..................... Exhibit 6 - Grand Park PA 6W Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout - Alternative Location............................................................................................................. Exhibit 7 - Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Reservoir Preliminary Layout ...................... Exhibit 8 - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion @ Gold Medal Ranch - PreliminaryLayout............................................................................................ Exhibit 9 - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion @ Blue Zone Treatment Facility - Preliminary Layout.............................................................................. 6 8 10 12 18 23 33 W a Town of Fraser. Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 of the signed Recovery Agreement, included with the Corps consultation letter to the US Fish and Wildlife Services, will assist to streamline the consultation process. 4.3.4 Capital Cost Estimate: The itemized preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost is included in Appendix F - Gold Medal Ranch Preliminary Design Information. This estimate is based on current unit cost pricing. Projections of this cost into future years will require application of a factor to allow for inflation. The estimated construction cost for the Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site is $728,040. The estimated total project cost (excluding easement or land acquisition costs) for the Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site is $982,854. 4.3.5 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost: Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs have been estimated to include routine maintenance, routine inspections, facility management, and other expenses to operate and maintain the facility. A detailed estimate is included in Appendix F - Gold Medal Ranch Preliminary Design Information. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost for the Gold Medal Ranch Augmentation Site is $13,180. 4.4 Potable Treatment of the St Louis Creek Diversion: 4.4.1 Water Rights Considerations: St. Louis Creek is a tributary to the Fraser River. Fraser's St. Louis Ditch Enlargement and Extension water right diverts from the Gaskill Ditch. The location of the Gaskill Ditch headgate, from St. Louis Creek, is at Landmark Point 183 as shown on Exhibit 1. Fraser's diversion from the Gaskill Ditch is shown on the Exhibit 1 Project Site map at landmark point 184. Fraser's diversion ditch will convey water from the Gaskill Ditch to the proposed St. Louis Creek water treatment plant. Fraser's St. Louis Ditch Enlargement and Extension surface water rights were originally decreed in Civil Action No. 183 for one cubic feet per second ("cfs") for irrigation. This water right was changed in Case No. W-2280. This case changed the point of diversion to the Gaskill Ditch headgate and the water right's beneficial uses to domestic, fire and sanitary, garden and lawn irrigation, and other household uses. A copy of Civil Action No. 183 and the Water Court decree, Case No. W-2280, are each included in Appendix G. Section 4.1.1 discusses St. Louis Creek water availability. Gaskill Ditch diversions typically take place from May through October. Fraser's St Louis Creek water rights could normally divert in April through July. From August to through March diversion would be possible from seven to sixteen days during each month. Surface water diversions in late fall, the winter, and earlier in the spring are complicated by freezing temperatures. 4.4.2 Design Criteria: Potable filtration treatment options are described herein to treat surface water, diverted from the St. Louis Creek, for use as a potable water source within Fraser's potable water distribution system. The filtration facility will be sized to produce flows of one cfs, an equivalent of 448 gallons per minute (gpm). Due to possible seasonal operation constraints created by the winter weather conditions, or a decision by Fraser, the treatment system can be either operated on an intermittent basis or on a full-time basis. The proposed treatment facility is a package filtration system contained within a building structure. Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 Two potable treatment facility site locations are identified as options. The first treatment site location would be located on the Gold Medal Ranch near the Gaskill Ditch headgate. This site allows for treatment near the source of diversion and pumping of the treated water into Fraser's potable water distribution system. This option is further described in Section 4.4.3. Site Analysis - Gold Medal Ranch Water Treatment Facility. The second treatment site proposed location is at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility located adjacent to Wapiti Drive at the north end of S. Wapiti Lane, extended. A raw water pump station would be located near the Gaskill Ditch headgate, with a force main extended to Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility. This option is further described in Section 4.4.4. Site Analysis - Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility. 4.4.3 Site Analysis - Gold Medal Ranch Water Treatment Facility: The proposed Potable Water Treatment Facility at the Gold Medal Ranch site is located downstream of the Gaskill Ditch headgate in an open meadow area adjacent to the access road to the Gaskill Ditch diversion. The treatment building site is located in the meadow adjacent to a treed area. The Potable Treatment Facility site is bounded on the north and west by the St. Louis Creek and on the south and east by open meadow area. The St. Louis Creek Potable Treatment Facility site is located near Landmark 185 as shown on Exhibit 1. Based on limited topography information available for the site, it appears that the southwest to northeast cross slope is in the range of three to eight percent. The site appears to be located outside of the 100 -year floodplain of the St. Louis Creek. It is proposed that the diversion will be taken from Fraser's Gaskill Ditch headgate at the location shown on Exhibit 8 Potable Treatment of St. Louis Creek Diversion (D Gold Medal Ranch - Preliminary Layout. 4.4.3.1 Preliminary Design: Preliminary design of the proposed Gold Medal Ranch Potable Treatment Facility is based on a system that will treat 500 gallons per minute (approximately 1 cfs). The proposed treatment system includes two filtration skids, each with capacity to treat water at a rate of 250 gpm. This design provides the flexibility to treat water at two flow rates (250 gpm or 500 gpm) and to operate the treatment system for a specific time period each day that best matches potable water demands. This package water treatment facility can either be operated year-round or seasonally. The proposed Potable Treatment Facility - Gold Medal Ranch water treatment system detail is further described in the following paragraphs: 4.4.3.2 Intake: For this alternative the "Intake" is defined as that segment of piping and structures needed to direct the surface water diversion from the Fraser's Gaskill Ditch diversion at the Gaskill Ditch head gate and flume to the treatment building. Starting at the lower location of the diversion intake: An 18 -Inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) would convey surface water from the St. Louis Creek, by gravity to a proposed underground raw water storage vault with overflow return. This underground raw water storage vault would contain a volume of water necessary to serve as the supply water to the treatment facility upon demand. This underground vault would be designed to contain a return flow system that when full, the excess surface water Revised 4-17-15 Exhibit 8 - Potable Treatment of St. Louis Creek Diversion @ Gold Medal Ranch Preliminary Layout N OW M a WC6M O d O W U MO V .E MCJ C: LLHN Z NU z ( Do U 0 LO z LO o NO V CO W N O m LL d M OO O N L L V O J s O V c as M MM 0- U. I-. OO _ 3WM a° SHEET Town of Fraser. Colorado -- Fraser Firmina Proiect Studv April 29. 2015 diversion is returned to the St. Louis Creek. Another 18 -Inch RCP will function as the return line to the creek. The RCP pipe manufacturer's detail are included in Appendix B - Forest Meadows Preliminary Design Information. A Raw Water Pump, located in the vault, would pump raw water from the underground storage vault into a water storage holding tank located at grade within the proposed treatment facility building. 4.4.3.3 Treatment and Pumping: The treatment facility would consist of an ultra filtration package treatment system with post treatment chlorination. Ultra filtration uses membrane filtration technology which is a pressure driven process that uses a semi -permeable (porous) membrane to separate particulate matter from soluble components in the carrier fluid (raw water supply). The ultra filtration membranes retain the particulate matter. Retained solids are concentrated on the membranes and thus each membrane periodically requires backwash. The raw water holding tank, located inside the treatment building, would serve as the start of the treatment process. Two calibrated pumps, each pump water from the holding tank to their respective skid mounted rack of membrane modules. Two skids each containing eighteen membrane modules are needed to treat one cfs of raw water flow. With this proposed configuration, the system can easily be operated at one-half cfs if needed to meet potable water demands. Filtered water from the ultra filtration process would be chlorinated and stored within a finish water clearwell located in a lower level of the treatment building. Potable water pumps located within the treatment building would pump treated water from the clearwell into Fraser's water distribution system through an 8 -inch C-900 PVC pipe. It is anticipated for this study, that the potable water will be pumped to the existing waterline distribution system near Carriage Road and Mill Avenue; and would replace the existing 8 -inch transite pipe through the cabin development at the Gold Medal Ranch within the North System of Fraser's system. New water taps to those existing water customers along the existing transite waterline being replaced are included as a part of the proposed project. This filtration system requires periodic backwash. Based on the treatment facility operating at full capacity, twenty hours per day and seven days per week, it is estimated that the facility could generate approximately 23,000 gallons of backwash water per day. This backwash water can either be discharged to an on-site sand filtration system or be discharged to a sanitary sewer system. For this system an optional integrated neutralization system is proposed that minimizes the volume of backwash water to dispose of. Typical manufacturer's literature in included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion - Preliminary Design Information. The sand filtration system would include a covered sand filter whereby silts and other particulate matter is separated from the return water. Return water is pumped back to the front of the treatment facility and the solids are periodically removed and properly disposed of off-site. An optional backwash water disposal method could include its discharge into a newly constructed gravity sanitary sewer line extension from the alley, between Carriage Road and Norgren Road, at Mill Avenue to the boundary of the Gold Medal Ranch. This option could serve this facility as well as serve a secondary function by extending future sanitary sewer Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 service to the cabin development by connecting service taps. After evaluating the two options the sand filtration system is included as a part of the proposed system. If the gravity sanitary sewer system were installed in lieu of the sand filtration system the Estimated Construction Cost would increase by approximately $105,000. The Total Estimated Project Cost would then increase by approximately $141,750. It is estimated that there could be an annual cost savings (operations and maintenance cost) of approximately $24,000 per year with installation of the sanitary sewer system in lieu of the sand filtration system. Electrical service including 480 V, Three phase service will be required at the treatment building site. It is recommended that easements be secured on the Gold Medal Ranch parcel for the proposed treatment facility, structures, piping, electrical service line and vehicular access located within the parcel boundary. It is recommended that easements also be secured along the proposed pipe route along the driveway through the cabin development for 8 - Inch C-900 PVCP waterline and, if selected, the 8 - Inch SDR -26 PVCP sanitary sewer line. 4.4.4 Site Analysis - Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility: The proposed Potable Water Treatment Facility option located at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility would share the site with Fraser's current well water treatment facility. This option would divert water from the St. Louis Creek at the Gaskill Ditch headgate and convey it to a proposed underground raw water vault and pump located on the Gold Medal Ranch adjacent to Fraser's existing chlorination building. Raw water would be pumped from this underground vault to the expanded treatment facility building at the Blue Zone Treatment Facility. The proposed raw water underground vault and pump would be located downstream of the Gaskill Ditch headgate in an open meadow area adjacent to Fraser's existing chlorination building near Landmark 188 as shown on Exhibit 1. Based on limited topography information available for the underground vault and pump site, it appears that the southwest to northeast cross slope is in the range of three to eight percent. The site appears to be located outside of the 100 -year floodplain of the St. Louis Creek. It is proposed that surface water will be diverted from Fraser's Gaskill Ditch headgate at the location shown on Exhibit 9 - Potable Treatment of St. Louis Creek Diversion (a)_ Blue Zone Treatment Facilitv - Preliminary Lavout. 4.4.4.1 Preliminary Design: Preliminary design of the proposed Blue Zone Potable Treatment Facility is based on a system that will treat 500 gallons per minute (approximately 1 cfs). The proposed treatment system includes two filtration skids, each with capacity to treat water at a rate of 250 gpm. This design provides the flexibility to treat water at two flow rates (250 gpm or 500 gpm) and to operate the treatment system for a specific time period each day that best matches potable water demands. This package water treatment facility can either be operated year- round or seasonally. The proposed Potable Treatment Facility - Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility system detail is further described in the following paragraphs: 4.4.4.2 Intake: For this alternative, the "Intake" is defined as that segment of piping and structures needed to direct surface water diversion from the Fraser's Gaskill Ditch diversion at the Gaskill Ditch Imagery Cate 9/23/2011 39'56"34,59" f'1 105°49'43.92" elev 8641 ft eye alt 19425 ft Exhibit 9 - Potable Treatment of St. Louis Creek Diversion @ BZ Water Treatment Facility Preliminary Layout EGiEZI r Town of Fraser, CO outs l aversion Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 head gate and flume to the proposed treatment building located adjacent to Fraser's current Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility. Starting at the lower location of the diversion intake: An 18 -Inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) would convey the surface water diversion from the St. Louis Creek, by gravity to a proposed underground raw water storage vault with overflow return. This underground raw water storage vault would contain a volume of water necessary to serve as the supply water to the treatment facility upon demand. This underground vault will be designed to contain a return flow system that when full, the excess surface water diversion is returned to the St. Louis Creek. Another 18 -Inch RCP will function as the return line to the creek. The RCP pipe manufacturer's detail are included in Appendix B - Forest Meadows Preliminary Design Information. A Raw Water Pump, located in the vault, would pump raw water from the underground storage vault through approximately 9,400 linear feet of new 8 - Inch C900 PVC pipe into a raw water storage vault at the proposed treatment facility. Another raw water pump would then pump into the water storage holding tank located at grade within the treatment facility building. The raw water line would generally follow a route along the shared access drive through the cabin development to CR 73; then follow CR 73 to the Town Limits where it becomes Mill Avenue, then following Mill Avenue, crossing under the Union Pacific Railroad track to a point adjacent to Highway 40. At that point the raw water force main would cross under Highway 40, in the area of the former Visitors Center, and then cross under the Fraser River and extend in a northerly direction along S. Wapiti Lane to Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility as shown on Exhibit 9. 4.4.4.3 Treatment and Pumping: The treatment facility would consist of an ultra filtration package treatment system with post treatment chlorination. Ultra filtration uses membrane filtration technology which is a pressure driven process that uses a semi -permeable (porous) membrane to separate particulate matter from soluble components in the carrier fluid (raw water supply). The ultra filtration membranes retain the particulate matter. Retained solids are concentrated on the membranes and thus each membrane periodically requires backwash. The raw water holding tank, located inside the treatment building would serve as the start of the treatment process. Two calibrated pumps, each pump water from the holding tank to their respective skid mounted rack of membrane modules. Two skids each containing eighteen membrane modules are needed to treat one cfs of raw water flow. With this proposed configuration, the system can easily be operated at one-half cfs if needed to meet potable water demands. Filtered water from the ultra filtration process would be chlorinated and stored within a finish water clearwell located in a lower level of the treatment building. This can either be a separate clearwell or a combined clearwell with the treated well water. Potable water pumps located within the treatment building would pump treated water from the clearwell into Fraser's water distribution system. This filtration system requires periodic backwash. Based on the treatment facility operating at full capacity, twenty hours per day and seven days per week, it is estimated that the facility could generate approximately 23,000 gallons per day. This backwash water can be processed through an integrated neutralization system and then either be discharged to an on-site sand filtration system or be discharged to a sanitary sewer system. Typical Town of Fraser. Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 manufacturer's literature in included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion - Preliminary Design Information. The sand filtration system would be a covered sand filter whereby silts and other particulate matter is separated from the return water. Return water is pumped back to the front of the treatment facility and the solids are periodically removed and properly disposed of off-site. It is unclear at this time if sufficient space exists at the Blue Zone Treatment Facility site for installation of the sand filtration system. It has; however, been included in the cost estimate for this system. Electrical service including 480 V, three phase service will be required at the proposed treatment building site. It is recommended that easements be secured on the Gold Medal Ranch parcel for the proposed treatment facility, structures, piping, electrical service line and vehicular access located within the parcel boundary. It is recommended that easements also be secured along the proposed pipe route along the driveway through the cabin development for the 8 - Inch C-900 PVCP force main. It is recommended that easements and/or license agreements be secured along the raw water force main route where the proposed raw waterline crosses private property and other agency rights-of-way. Preliminary information suggests that the existing Blue Zone Treatment Facility building is sited on an open space tract adjacent to a sixty foot wide tract extending north -south on the east side of the Blue Zone Treatment Facility building. Various electrical, gas and water easements are located on that tract. An in-depth investigation is needed at this potential site to determine the area available for the proposed filtration treatment system. 4.4.5 Preliminary Environmental: The proposed Potable Treatment Facility project generally includes construction of a package plant potable water treatment facility with a raw water force main intake line and a treated water outfall line connecting to Fraser's water system. Based on information from the Corps, this construction will require preparation and submittal of Nationwide Permit 12 Utility Line Activities) Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Included in that PCN will be details of the project and its land disturbances along with: A Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation of wetlands (PJD). A determination and summary of the vegetation species. An analysis of threatened and endangered species. An analysis of migratory bird breeding areas. A Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. A copy of the current required Nation Wide Permit No. 12 Pre -Construction Notification PCN) and the Colorado Regional Conditions are included in Appendix C - Environmental Forms and Requirements for reference. It is anticipated that the USACE will consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for depletions associated with the project. Based on information from the Corps of Engineers, the PCN should include the water decree information, as well as calculations and brief rationale of the annual depletion, Town of Fraser, Colorado -- Fraser Firming Project Study April 29, 2015 in acre-feet, associated with the surface water diversion and storage pond evaporation. A Recovery Agreement, copy included in Appendix B - Environmental Forms and Requirements for reference, requires signature and inclusion in the PCN submittal if the applicant / owner would like benefit from the Endangered Species Act compliance under the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program. It is understood that submittal of the signed Recovery Agreement, included with the Corps consultation letter to the US Fish and Wildlife Services, will assist to streamline the consultation process. 4.4.6 Capital Cost Estimate: The itemized preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost is included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion Preliminary Design Information. This estimate is based on current unit cost pricing for a 500 gallon per minute treatment facility. Projections of this cost into future years will require application of a factor to allow for inflation. The estimated construction cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at the Gold Medal Ranch site is $2,718,840. The estimated total project cost (excluding easement or land acquisition costs) for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at the Gold Medal Ranch site is $3,670,434. The estimated construction cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility site is $3,301,560. The estimated total project cost (excluding easement or land acquisition costs) for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility site is $4,457,106. 4.4.7 Annual Operation and Maintenance Cost: Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs have been estimated for the current population base usage of approximately 250,000 gallons per day operating year -around. The Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs include routine maintenance inspections, facility operation and management, chemicals electrical usage, backwash water disposal and other expenses to operate and maintain the treatment facility. Detailed information of the treatment equipment and estimated volumes of backwash flows as well as the detailed annual operation and maintenance cost to operate the facility are included in Appendix H - Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion Preliminary Design Information. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at the Gold Medal Ranch site is $94,000. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost for the Potable Treatment of the St. Louis Creek Diversion at Fraser's Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility site is $94,500. Cost Estimate JRS ENGINEERING CONSULTANT, LLC Project: Fraser Firming Study St. Louis Creek Potable Wtr Treatment at Gold Medal Ranch w/SFilterOption Date: April 17, 2015 No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 2 Traffic Control 1 LS 2,500.00 2,500.00 3 Erosion Control 1 LS 7,000.00 7,000.00 4 Reve etation 5 AC 1,500.00 7,500.00 5 18 -Inch RCP 900 LF 70.00 63,000.00 6 18 -Inch Flared End Section 1 EA 900.00 900.00 7 8 -Inch C-900 PVC Pipe 3600 LF 65.00 234,000.00 8 8 -Inch A/C Replace w/C-900 PVCP 4000 LF 65.00 260,000.00 9 Covered Sand Filter Bkwash System 1 LS 160,000.00 160,000.00 11 1 Raw Water Underground Vault 1 LS 40,000.00 40,000.00 12 Treatment Bldg - Complete w/clearwell, pump, HVAC, piping, electrical, access, etc 1 LS 600,000.00 600,000.00 13 Filtration Equipment 1 LS 595,000.00 595,000.00 14 Disinfection & Misc Equip 1 LS 11,000.00 11,000.00 15 Electrical Service 1 LS 220,000.00 220,000.00 16 Access Road Upgrade 1 LS 1,200.00 1,200.00 17 Asphalt Remove & Replace 590 TN 80.00 47,200.00 18 Earthwork / Grading 200 Cy 30.00 6,000.00 19 1 Fence 200 LF 12.00 2,400.00 20 Utility Locates & Potholing 1 LS 3,000.00 3,000.00 Subtotal Contingency Subtotal - Total Estimated Construction Cost Legal & Administrative Surveying Engineering & Construction Services Total Estimated Project Cost Easement Costs Not Included 3,670,434 2,265,700 20% 453,140 2,718,840 15% 407,826 5% 135,942 15% 407,826 3,670,434 JRS ENGINEERING CONSULTANT, LLC Project: Cost Estimate Fraser Firming Study St. Louis Creek Potable Wtr Treatment at Blue Zone Water Treatment Facility Date: April 17, 2015 No. Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 2 Traffic Control & Permits 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 3 Erosion Control 1 LS 12,000.00 12,000.00 4 Reve etation 5 AC 1,500.00 7,500.00 5 18 -Inch RCP 2950 LF 70.00 206,500.00 6 18 -Inch Flared End Section 1 EA 900.00 900.00 7 8 -Inch C-900 PVC Pipe 9400 LF 65.00 611,000.00 8 UPRR Bore 1 EA 60,000.00 60,000.00 9 Highway 40 Bore 1 EA 30,000.00 30,000.00 10 Fraser River Crossing 1 EA 12,000.00 12,000.00 11 Raw Water Underground Vault 2 EA 40,000.00 80,000.00 12 Treatment Bldg - Complete w/clearwell, pump, HVAC, piping, electrical, access, etc 1 LS 700,000.00 700,000.00 13 Filtration Equipment 1 LS 595,000.00 595,000.00 14 Disinfection & Misc Equip 1 LS 11,000.00 11,000.00 15 Utility Relocation/Connection 1 LS 15,000.00 15,000.00 16 Electrical Service 1 LS 60,000.00 60,000.00 17 Access Road Upgrade/Repair 1 LS 13,000.00 13,000.00 18 Asphalt Remove & Replace 1500 TN 80.00 120,000.00 19 Earthwork / Grading 600 CY 30.00 18,000.00 20 Fence 200 LF 12.00 2,400.00 21 Utility Locates & Potholing 1 LS 12,000.00 12,000.00 22 Covered Sand Filter Bkwash System 1 LS 160,000.00 160,000.00 Subtotal Contingency Subtotal - Total Estimated Construction Cost Legal & Administrative Surveying Engineering & Construction Services Total Estimated Project Cost Easement Costs Not Included 2,751,300 20% $ 550,260 3,301,560 15% $ 495,234 5% $ 165,078 15% $ 495,234 4,457,106 Town of Fraser 10-Year CIP Report APPENDIX B 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 A B D E F G J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ 4/13/2023 Sp r e a d s h e e t Nu m b e r i n g Ut i l i t y A r e a N u m b e r Utility Area Description Asset Numbering Treatment Process/ Basin / Zone Major Component / Subbasin / Subzone La t e s t F o r m a l C o n d i t i o n As s e s s m e n t Di s c i p l i n e I n s t a l l a t i o n Ye a r Si g n i f i c a n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Ye a r Co d e s f o r U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r C o p i e d V a l u e s Or i g i n a l U s e f u l L i f e Us e f u l L i f e M u l t i p l i e r (a l w a y s 1 . 0 i f cr i t i c a l i t y > 1 3 ) St r e t c h e d U s e f u l L i f e us i n g U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r Ca l c u l a t e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r St r e t c h e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r Re m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e St r e t c h e d R e m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e Po r t i o n o f S t r e t c h e d Us e f u l L i f e R e m a i n i n g Capital Replacement Value De s i g n Co n t i n g e n c y (3 5 % ) Ge n e r a l Co n d i t i o n s (1 2 % ) Co n t r a c t o r O& P (8 % ) EL A C (3 0 % ) Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) As s e t A m o u n t C i t y i s Re s p o n s i b l e F o r City -Owned Portion of Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) Depreciated Value of City- Owned Prorated Cost Re p a i r C o s t F a c t o r Repair Project Cost Annual O&M Prediction Based on City Owned Pro- Rated Capital Cost Vu l n e r a b i l i t y St r e t c h e d V u l n e r a b i l i t y Ri s k St r e t c h e d R i s k 35 % 12 % 8%30 % Pu b l i c H e a l t h & S a f e t y Ef f e c t o n Op e r a t i o n s En v i r o n m e nt Co s t o f Re p a i r Ov e r a l l [ Σ ] 2023 2022 Value COST SOURCE 1 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 100 Fraser Well No. 1 Fraser Well No. 1 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 1982 2022 40 15 1.0 15 2037 2037 14 14 93% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ 345,333$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 2 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 101 Fraser Well No. 1 Fraser Well No. 1 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 3 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 200 Fraser Well No. 2 Fraser Well No. 2 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 1982 2021 40 15 1.0 15 2036 2036 13 13 87% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ 320,667$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 4 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 201 Fraser Well No. 2 Fraser Well No. 2 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 5 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 300 Fraser Well No. 3b Fraser Well No. 3b Pump, Piping, and Electrical 1987 2021 40 15 1.0 15 2036 2036 13 13 87% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ 320,667$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 6 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 301 Fraser Well No. 3b Fraser Well No. 3b Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 7 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 500 Fraser Well No. 5 Fraser Well No. 5 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 2008 40 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ -$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.9 0.9 18.0 18.0 8 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 501 Fraser Well No. 5 Fraser Well No. 5 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 9 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 700 Fraser Well No. 7 Fraser Well No. 7 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 1988 2022 40 15 1.0 15 2037 2037 14 14 93% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ 345,333$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 10 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 701 Fraser Well No. 7 Fraser Well No. 7 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 11 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 800 Fraser Well No. 8 Fraser Well No. 8 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 2019 40 15 1.0 15 2034 2034 11 11 73% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ 271,333$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 12 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 801 Fraser Well No. 8 Fraser Well No. 8 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 13 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 900 Fraser Well No. 9 Fraser Well No. 9 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 1988 2021 40 15 1.0 15 2036 2036 13 13 87% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ 320,667$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 14 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 901 Fraser Well No. 9 Fraser Well No. 9 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 15 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 1000 Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Age unknown 3126 LF at $785/LF 1975 160 60 1.0 60 2035 2035 12 12 20% 2,453,910$ Westminster UC and GIS LF 858,869$ 294,469$ 196,313$ 736,173$ $ 4,540,000 100%4,540,000$ 908,000$ 75% $ 3,405,000 56,750$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 16 13 Raw Water Sys North Well Field - 1001 Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Install 2010-2015 3126 LF at $785/LF 2010 160 60 1.0 60 2070 2070 47 47 78% 2,453,910$ Westminster UC and GIS LF 858,869$ 294,469$ 196,313$ 736,173$ $ 4,540,000 100%4,540,000$ 3,556,333$ 75% $ 3,405,000 56,750$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 17 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 100 Maryvale Well No. 1 Maryvale Well No. 1 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 2001 40 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ -$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.9 0.9 18.0 18.0 18 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 101 Maryvale Well No. 1 Maryvale Well No. 1 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 19 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 400 Maryvale Well No. 4 Maryvale Well No. 4 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 2001 40 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ -$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.9 0.9 18.0 18.0 20 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 401 Maryvale Well No. 4 Maryvale Well No. 4 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 21 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 500 Maryvale Well No. 5 Maryvale Well No. 5 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 2001 40 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ -$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.9 0.9 18.0 18.0 22 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 501 Maryvale Well No. 5 Maryvale Well No. 5 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 23 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 700 Maryvale Well No. 7 Maryvale Well No. 7 Pump, Piping, and Electrical 2001 40 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 200,000$ Previous GW experience - placeholder until HRS cost 70,000$ 24,000$ 16,000$ 60,000$ $ 370,000 100%370,000$ -$ 75% $ 278,000 22,200$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.9 0.9 18.0 18.0 24 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 701 Maryvale Well No. 7 Maryvale Well No. 7 Mag Meter 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88%10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 25 13 Raw Water Sys South Well Field - 1000 Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Age unknown 2976 LF at $785/LF 1975 2002 160 60 1.0 60 2062 2062 39 39 65% 2,336,160$ Westminster UC and GIS LF 817,656$ 280,339$ 186,893$ 700,848$ $ 4,322,000 100%4,322,000$ 2,809,300$ 75% $ 3,242,000 54,025$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 26 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs Potable Dis Sys - 110 Potable Transmission Transmission Line (>12") Age unknown 3977 LF at $1020/LF 1975 160 60 1.0 60 2035 2035 12 12 20% 4,056,540$ Westminster UC and GIS LF 1,419,789$ 486,785$ 324,523$ 1,216,962$ $ 7,505,000 100%7,505,000$ 1,501,000$ 75% $ 5,629,000 93,813$ 5 5 4 6 20 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 27 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs Potable Dis Sys - 170 Potable Distribution Distribution Line (<=12") Age unknown 118730 LF at $785/LF 1975 160 60 1.0 60 2035 2035 12 12 20% 93,203,050$ Westminster UC and GIS LF 32,621,068$ 11,184,366$ 7,456,244$ 27,960,915$ $ 172,426,000 100%172,426,000$ 34,485,200$ 75% $ 129,320,000 2,155,325$ 0 0 4 2 6 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 28 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-100 PRV 1 - 6" Pressure Relief at Wapiti - ABANDONED Vault Structure 1975 115 40 1.3 52 2023 2027 0 4 8% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 7,154$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.2 6.3 1.4 29 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-150 PRV 1 - 6" Pressure Relief at Wapiti - ABANDONED Valves & Piping 1975 90 25 1.0 25 2023 2023 0 0 0% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ -$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.9 0.9 16.2 16.2 30 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-200 PRV 2 - 6" Pressure Relief at Elk Ranch Vault Structure 2005 115 40 1.3 52 2045 2057 22 34 65% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 60,808$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 31 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-250 PRV 2 - 6" Pressure Relief at Elk Ranch Valves & Piping 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2030 2030 7 7 28% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ 38,920$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 32 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-300 PRV 3 - 6" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd. Vault Structure 2005 115 40 1.3 52 2045 2057 22 34 65% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 60,808$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 33 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-350 PRV 3 - 6" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd. Valves & Piping 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2030 2030 7 7 28% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ 38,920$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 34 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-400 PRV 4 - 8" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd. South Vault Structure 2005 115 40 1.3 52 2045 2057 22 34 65% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 60,808$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 35 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-450 PRV 4 - 8" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd. South Valves & Piping 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2030 2030 7 7 28% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ 38,920$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 36 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-500 PRV 5 - 6" Pressure Relief at Dsicovery (Green/Yellow) Vault Structure 2005 115 40 1.0 40 2045 2045 22 22 55% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 51,150$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 10 4 2 16 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 37 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-550 PRV 5 - 6" Pressure Relief at Dsicovery (Green/Yellow) Valves & Piping 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2030 2030 7 7 28% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ 38,920$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 38 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-600 PRV 6 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Green) Vault Structure 2005 115 40 1.0 40 2045 2045 22 22 55% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 51,150$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 10 4 2 16 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 39 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-650 PRV 6 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Green) Valves & Piping 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2030 2030 7 7 28% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ 38,920$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 40 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-700 PRV 7 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Red/Green) Vault Structure 2005 115 40 1.0 40 2045 2045 22 22 55% 50,000$ Westminster Typ 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 51,150$ 50% $ 47,000 930$ 0 10 4 2 16 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 41 1 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV-750 PRV 7 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Red/Green) Valves & Piping 2005 90 25 1.0 25 2030 2030 7 7 28% 75,000$ Westminster Typ 26,250$ 9,000$ 6,000$ 22,500$ $ 139,000 100%139,000$ 38,920$ 50% $ 70,000 2,780$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 42 4 Master Meters & Shop Master Meters - 1900 Potable Meters Potable meters and meter pit 1990 10 10 1.2 12 2023 2023 0 0 0% 2,018,000$ Westminster Typ 706,300$ 242,160$ 161,440$ 605,400$ $ 3,734,000 100%3,734,000$ -$ 100% $ 3,734,000 298,720$ 0 0 0 6 6 -- -- -- -- Criticality Current Year First Available Budget Year= Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\202210 Combined Asset Inventory Printed on 4/13/2023 8:41 PM Page 1 of 4 4 5 6 A B D E F G J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ Sp r e a d s h e e t Nu m b e r i n g Ut i l i t y A r e a N u m b e r Utility Area Description Asset Numbering Treatment Process/ Basin / Zone Major Component / Subbasin / Subzone La t e s t F o r m a l C o n d i t i o n As s e s s m e n t Di s c i p l i n e I n s t a l l a t i o n Ye a r Si g n i f i c a n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Ye a r Co d e s f o r U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r C o p i e d V a l u e s Or i g i n a l U s e f u l L i f e Us e f u l L i f e M u l t i p l i e r (a l w a y s 1 . 0 i f cr i t i c a l i t y > 1 3 ) St r e t c h e d U s e f u l L i f e us i n g U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r Ca l c u l a t e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r St r e t c h e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r Re m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e St r e t c h e d R e m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e Po r t i o n o f S t r e t c h e d Us e f u l L i f e R e m a i n i n g Capital Replacement Value De s i g n Co n t i n g e n c y (3 5 % ) Ge n e r a l Co n d i t i o n s (1 2 % ) Co n t r a c t o r O& P (8 % ) EL A C (3 0 % ) Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) As s e t A m o u n t C i t y i s Re s p o n s i b l e F o r City -Owned Portion of Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) Depreciated Value of City- Owned Prorated Cost Re p a i r C o s t F a c t o r Repair Project Cost Annual O&M Prediction Based on City Owned Pro- Rated Capital Cost Vu l n e r a b i l i t y St r e t c h e d V u l n e r a b i l i t y Ri s k St r e t c h e d R i s k 35 % 12 % 8%30 % Pu b l i c H e a l t h & S a f e t y Ef f e c t o n Op e r a t i o n s En v i r o n m e nt Co s t o f Re p a i r Ov e r a l l [ Σ ] Criticality First Available Budget Year= 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 43 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 100 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Building, including stairwell 2005 130 50 1.4 70 2055 2075 32 52 74% 250,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 87,500$ 30,000$ 20,000$ 75,000$ $ 463,000 100%463,000$ 343,943$ 33% $ 153,000 1,158$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 44 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 102 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Building HVAC 2005 65 20 1.0 20 2025 2025 2 2 10% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 18,500$ 33% $ 62,000 9,250$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.7 0.7 2.8 2.8 45 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 103 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump G1, 15 HP 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 6,000$ Falcon Estimate 2,100$ 720$ 480$ 1,800$ $ 12,000 100%12,000$ -$ 75% $ 9,000 720$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 46 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 104 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump G2, 15 HP 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 6,000$ Falcon Estimate 2,100$ 720$ 480$ 1,800$ $ 12,000 100%12,000$ -$ 75% $ 9,000 720$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 47 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 112 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump Station Valves and Piping 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 300,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 105,000$ 36,000$ 24,000$ 90,000$ $ 555,000 100%555,000$ -$ 75% $ 417,000 33,300$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 48 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 113 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pressure Gauges 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Westminster NWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 75% $ 15,000 1,140$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 49 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 114 Green Zone Booster Pump Station 6" Mag Meter 2005 70 20 1.2 24 2025 2029 2 6 25% 10,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 4,750$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.7 0.1 4.9 0.7 50 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 117 Green Zone Booster Pump Station MCC 2005 100 30 1.0 30 2035 2035 12 12 40% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 74,000$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 5 10 0 4 19 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 51 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 118 Green Zone Booster Pump Station PLC 2005 50 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 50,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ -$ 100% $ 93,000 2,790$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 52 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 119 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Auto Transfer Switch 2005 100 30 1.2 36 2035 2041 12 18 50% 40,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 14,000$ 4,800$ 3,200$ 12,000$ $ 74,000 100%74,000$ 37,000$ 50% $ 37,000 3,700$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 53 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 120 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Quick Disconnect 2005 100 30 1.2 36 2035 2041 12 18 50% 30,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 10,500$ 3,600$ 2,400$ 9,000$ $ 56,000 100%56,000$ 28,000$ 50% $ 28,000 2,800$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 54 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 122 Green Zone Booster Pump Station Generator 2005 100 30 1.2 36 2035 2041 12 18 50% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 92,500$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 55 7 Pump Stations PS Green Zone - 125 Green Zone Booster Pump Station SCADA and Antennas 2005 20 12 1.0 12 2023 2023 0 0 0% 20,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 7,000$ 2,400$ 1,600$ 6,000$ $ 37,000 100%37,000$ -$ 100% $ 37,000 1,850$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 56 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 100 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Building 2005 130 50 1.4 70 2055 2075 32 52 74% 250,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 87,500$ 30,000$ 20,000$ 75,000$ $ 463,000 100%463,000$ 343,943$ 33% $ 153,000 1,158$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 57 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 102 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Building HVAC 2005 65 20 1.0 20 2025 2025 2 2 10% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 18,500$ 33% $ 62,000 9,250$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.7 0.7 2.8 2.8 58 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 103 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R1, 1.5 HP 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 2,000$ Falcon Estimate 700$ 240$ 160$ 600$ $ 4,000 100%4,000$ -$ 75% $ 3,000 240$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 59 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 104 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R2, 7.5 HP 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 4,000$ Falcon Estimate 1,400$ 480$ 320$ 1,200$ $ 8,000 100%8,000$ -$ 75% $ 6,000 480$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 60 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 105 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R3, 7.5 HP 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 4,000$ Falcon Estimate 1,400$ 480$ 320$ 1,200$ $ 8,000 100%8,000$ -$ 75% $ 6,000 480$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 61 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 107 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R4, 326 HP 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 80,000$ Guesstimate for now 28,000$ 9,600$ 6,400$ 24,000$ $ 148,000 100%148,000$ -$ 75% $ 111,000 8,880$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 62 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 111 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump Station Valves and Piping 2005 115 40 1.3 52 2045 2057 22 34 65% 300,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 105,000$ 36,000$ 24,000$ 90,000$ $ 555,000 100%555,000$ 362,885$ 33% $ 184,000 5,550$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 63 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 112 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pressure Gauges 2005 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Westminster NWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 75% $ 15,000 1,140$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 64 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 113 Red Zone Booster Pump Station 6" Mag Meter 2005 70 20 1.2 24 2025 2029 2 6 25% 10,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 4,750$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.7 0.1 4.9 0.7 65 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 114 Red Zone Booster Pump Station MCC 2005 100 30 1.0 30 2035 2035 12 12 40% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 74,000$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 5 10 0 4 19 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.0 66 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 118 Red Zone Booster Pump Station PLC 2005 50 15 1.0 15 2023 2023 0 0 0% 50,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ -$ 100% $ 93,000 2,790$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 67 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 119 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Auto Transfer Switch 2005 100 30 1.2 36 2035 2041 12 18 50% 40,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 14,000$ 4,800$ 3,200$ 12,000$ $ 74,000 100%74,000$ 37,000$ 50% $ 37,000 3,700$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 68 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 120 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Quick Disconnect 2005 100 30 1.2 36 2035 2041 12 18 50% 30,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 10,500$ 3,600$ 2,400$ 9,000$ $ 56,000 100%56,000$ 28,000$ 50% $ 28,000 2,800$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 69 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 122 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Generator 2005 100 30 1.2 36 2035 2041 12 18 50% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 92,500$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 70 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 125 Red Zone Booster Pump Station SCADA and Antennas 2005 20 12 1.0 12 2023 2023 0 0 0% 20,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS (slightly larger so conservative but similar age) 7,000$ 2,400$ 1,600$ 6,000$ $ 37,000 100%37,000$ -$ 100% $ 37,000 1,850$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 71 7 Pump Stations PS Red Zone - 126 Red Zone Booster Pump Station Hydrostatic Storage Tanks 2005 70 20 1.2 24 2025 2029 2 6 25% 40,000$ Guesstimate for now 14,000$ 4,800$ 3,200$ 12,000$ $ 74,000 100%74,000$ 18,500$ 75% $ 56,000 5,920$ 0 5 0 6 11 0.7 0.1 7.7 1.1 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\202210 Combined Asset Inventory Printed on 4/13/2023 8:41 PM Page 2 of 4 4 5 6 A B D E F G J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ Sp r e a d s h e e t Nu m b e r i n g Ut i l i t y A r e a N u m b e r Utility Area Description Asset Numbering Treatment Process/ Basin / Zone Major Component / Subbasin / Subzone La t e s t F o r m a l C o n d i t i o n As s e s s m e n t Di s c i p l i n e I n s t a l l a t i o n Ye a r Si g n i f i c a n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Ye a r Co d e s f o r U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r C o p i e d V a l u e s Or i g i n a l U s e f u l L i f e Us e f u l L i f e M u l t i p l i e r (a l w a y s 1 . 0 i f cr i t i c a l i t y > 1 3 ) St r e t c h e d U s e f u l L i f e us i n g U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r Ca l c u l a t e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r St r e t c h e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r Re m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e St r e t c h e d R e m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e Po r t i o n o f S t r e t c h e d Us e f u l L i f e R e m a i n i n g Capital Replacement Value De s i g n Co n t i n g e n c y (3 5 % ) Ge n e r a l Co n d i t i o n s (1 2 % ) Co n t r a c t o r O& P (8 % ) EL A C (3 0 % ) Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) As s e t A m o u n t C i t y i s Re s p o n s i b l e F o r City -Owned Portion of Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) Depreciated Value of City- Owned Prorated Cost Re p a i r C o s t F a c t o r Repair Project Cost Annual O&M Prediction Based on City Owned Pro- Rated Capital Cost Vu l n e r a b i l i t y St r e t c h e d V u l n e r a b i l i t y Ri s k St r e t c h e d R i s k 35 % 12 % 8%30 % Pu b l i c H e a l t h & S a f e t y Ef f e c t o n Op e r a t i o n s En v i r o n m e nt Co s t o f Re p a i r Ov e r a l l [ Σ ] Criticality First Available Budget Year= 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 72 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-102 North Water Treatment Plant Building, 20'x20'1998 130 50 1.4 70 2048 2068 25 45 64% 147,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 51,450$ 17,640$ 11,760$ 44,100$ $ 272,000 100%272,000$ 174,857$ 33% $ 90,000 680$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 73 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-102 North Water Treatment Plant Storage Sheds (x2)1998 130 50 1.4 70 2048 2068 25 45 64% 100,000$ Guesstimate for now 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 118,929$ 33% $ 62,000 463$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 74 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-104 North Water Treatment Plant HVAC Fan and Heater 1998 65 20 1.0 20 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 33% $ 7,000 950$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 75 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-105 North Water Treatment Plant Clearwell, 20'x20' 2018 1998 130 50 1.0 50 2048 2048 25 25 50% 300,000$ Westminster Jim Baker and PS Interconnect 105,000$ 36,000$ 24,000$ 90,000$ $ 555,000 100%555,000$ 277,500$ 33% $ 184,000 1,388$ 5 10 8 4 27 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 76 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-106 North Water Treatment Plant 6"/8" Valves and Piping 1998 90 25 1.0 25 2023 2023 0 0 0% 175,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 61,250$ 21,000$ 14,000$ 52,500$ $ 324,000 100%324,000$ -$ 50% $ 162,000 6,480$ 0 10 0 4 14 0.9 0.9 12.6 12.6 77 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-108 North Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges 1998 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0%10,000$ Westminster NWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 75% $ 15,000 1,140$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 78 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-109 North Water Treatment Plant 6" Mag Meter 1998 2020 70 20 1.2 24 2040 2044 17 21 88% 10,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 16,625$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 79 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-110 North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 1, 30 HP 1998 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 32,500$ Falcon Estimate 11,375$ 3,900$ 2,600$ 9,750$ $ 61,000 100%61,000$ -$ 75% $ 46,000 3,660$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 80 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-111 North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 30 HP 1998 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 32,500$ Falcon Estimate 11,375$ 3,900$ 2,600$ 9,750$ $ 61,000 100%61,000$ -$ 75% $ 46,000 3,660$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 81 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-112 North Water Treatment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ Valve Box 1998 70 20 1.2 24 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 82 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-113 North Water Treatment Plant Chemical Chlorine Addition 1998 2021 65 20 1.0 20 2041 2041 18 18 90% $ 60,000 Westminster SWTF 21,000$ 7,200$ 4,800$ 18,000$ $ 111,000 100%111,000$ 99,900$ 33% $ 37,000 5,550$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 83 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-114 North Water Treatment Plant Chemical Soda Ash Addition 1998 65 20 1.0 20 2023 2023 0 0 0% $ 50,000 Westminster SWTF 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ -$ 33% $ 31,000 4,650$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 84 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-115 North Water Treatment Plant Radionucleide Treatment 1998 65 20 1.0 20 2023 2023 0 0 0% $ 50,000 Guesstimate for now 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ -$ 33% $ 31,000 4,650$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 85 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-321 North Water Treatment Plant Air Diffuser Assembly 1998 2023 70 20 1.2 24 2043 2047 20 24 100%35,000$ Guesstimate for now 12,250$ 4,200$ 2,800$ 10,500$ $ 65,000 100%65,000$ 65,000$ 75% $ 49,000 5,200$ 0 5 4 2 11 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.2 86 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-330 North Water Treatment Plant Generator 1998 100 30 1.2 36 2028 2034 5 11 31% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 56,528$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 87 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-334 North Water Treatment Plant MCC 1998 100 30 1.0 30 2028 2028 5 5 17% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 30,833$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 5 10 0 4 19 0.2 0.2 3.8 3.8 88 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-341 North Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect 1998 100 30 1.0 30 2028 2028 5 5 17% 30,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 10,500$ 3,600$ 2,400$ 9,000$ $ 56,000 100%56,000$ 9,333$ 50% $ 28,000 2,800$ 0 10 4 2 16 0.2 0.2 3.2 3.2 89 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-343 North Water Treatment Plant PLC/HMI 1998 2018 50 15 1.0 15 2033 2033 10 10 67% 50,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 62,000$ 100% $ 93,000 2,790$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 90 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-374 North Water Treatment Plant SCADA System 1998 2020 20 12 1.0 12 2032 2032 9 9 75% 20,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 7,000$ 2,400$ 1,600$ 6,000$ $ 37,000 100%37,000$ 27,750$ 100% $ 37,000 1,850$ 0 10 0 2 12 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.2 91 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-385 North Water Treatment Plant pH Analyzer 1998 20 12 1.0 12 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Westminster SWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 100% $ 19,000 950$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 92 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-388 North Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Colorimeter Analyzer 1998 2020 20 12 1.0 12 2032 2032 9 9 75% 10,000$ Westminster NWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 14,250$ 100% $ 19,000 950$ 5 5 8 2 20 0.1 0.1 2.0 2.0 93 9.2 Treatment Plants NWTP-388 North Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer Switch 1998 100 30 1.2 36 2028 2034 5 11 31% 40,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 14,000$ 4,800$ 3,200$ 12,000$ $ 74,000 100%74,000$ 22,611$ 50% $ 37,000 3,700$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 94 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-102 South Water Treatment Plant Building, 32'x22.5'2002 130 50 1.4 70 2052 2072 29 49 70% 180,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 63,000$ 21,600$ 14,400$ 54,000$ $ 333,000 100%333,000$ 233,100$ 33% $ 110,000 833$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 95 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-104 South Water Treatment Plant HVAC Fan and Heater 2002 65 20 1.0 20 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 33% $ 7,000 950$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 96 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-105 South Water Treatment Plant Clearwell, 32'x22.5' 2018 2002 130 50 1.0 50 2052 2052 29 29 58% 350,000$ Westminster Jim Baker and PS Interconnect 122,500$ 42,000$ 28,000$ 105,000$ $ 648,000 100%648,000$ 375,840$ 33% $ 214,000 1,620$ 5 10 8 6 29 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 97 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-106 South Water Treatment Plant 6"/8" Valves and Piping 2002 90 25 1.0 25 2027 2027 4 4 16% 175,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 61,250$ 21,000$ 14,000$ 52,500$ $ 324,000 100%324,000$ 51,840$ 50% $ 162,000 6,480$ 0 10 0 4 14 0.2 0.2 2.8 2.8 98 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-108 South Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges 2002 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0%10,000$ Westminster NWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 75% $ 15,000 1,140$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.9 1.8 1.8 99 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-109 South Water Treatment Plant 6" Mag Meter 2002 70 20 1.2 24 2023 2026 0 3 13% 10,000$ Westminster Eaton PS - Similar size 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 2,375$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.4 6.3 2.8 100 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-110 South Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 1, 40 HP 2002 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 38,000$ Falcon Estimate 13,300$ 4,560$ 3,040$ 11,400$ $ 71,000 100%71,000$ -$ 75% $ 54,000 4,260$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 101 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-111 South Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 40 HP 2002 40 15 1.2 18 2023 2023 0 0 0% 38,000$ Falcon Estimate 13,300$ 4,560$ 3,040$ 11,400$ $ 71,000 100%71,000$ -$ 75% $ 54,000 4,260$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 102 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-112 South Water Treatment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ Valve Box 2002 70 20 1.2 24 2023 2026 0 3 13% 10,000$ Guesstimate for now 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 2,375$ 75% $ 15,000 1,520$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.9 0.4 1.8 0.8 103 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-112 South Water Treatment Plant Chemical Chlorine Addition 2002 2021 65 20 1.0 20 2041 2041 18 18 90% $ 60,000 Westminster SWTF 21,000$ 7,200$ 4,800$ 18,000$ $ 111,000 100%111,000$ 99,900$ 33% $ 37,000 5,550$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 104 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-113 South Water Treatment Plant Chemical Soda Ash Addition 2002 65 20 1.0 20 2023 2023 0 0 0% $ 50,000 Westminster SWTF 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ -$ 33% $ 31,000 4,650$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 105 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-114 South Water Treatment Plant Radionucleide Treatment 2002 65 20 1.0 20 2023 2023 0 0 0% $ 50,000 Guesstimate for now 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ -$ 33% $ 31,000 4,650$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 106 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-115 South Water Treatment Plant Air Diffuser Assembly 2002 70 20 1.2 24 2023 2026 0 3 13%35,000$ Guesstimate for now 12,250$ 4,200$ 2,800$ 10,500$ $ 65,000 100%65,000$ 8,125$ 75% $ 49,000 5,200$ 0 5 4 2 11 0.9 0.4 9.9 4.4 107 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-116 South Water Treatment Plant Generator 2002 100 30 1.2 36 2032 2038 9 15 42% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 77,083$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 0 0 0 4 4 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 108 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-117 South Water Treatment Plant MCC 2002 100 30 1.0 30 2032 2032 9 9 30% 100,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 35,000$ 12,000$ 8,000$ 30,000$ $ 185,000 100%185,000$ 55,500$ 50% $ 93,000 9,250$ 5 10 0 4 19 0.1 0.1 1.9 1.9 109 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-118 South Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect 2002 100 30 1.0 30 2032 2032 9 9 30% 30,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 10,500$ 3,600$ 2,400$ 9,000$ $ 56,000 100%56,000$ 16,800$ 50% $ 28,000 2,800$ 0 10 4 2 16 0.1 0.1 1.6 1.6 110 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-119 South Water Treatment Plant PLC/HMI 2002 2018 50 15 1.0 15 2033 2033 10 10 67% 50,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 17,500$ 6,000$ 4,000$ 15,000$ $ 93,000 100%93,000$ 62,000$ 100% $ 93,000 2,790$ 0 10 4 4 18 0.1 0.1 1.8 1.8 111 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-120 South Water Treatment Plant SCADA System 2002 2020 20 12 1.0 12 2032 2032 9 9 75% 20,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 7,000$ 2,400$ 1,600$ 6,000$ $ 37,000 100%37,000$ 27,750$ 100% $ 37,000 1,850$ 0 10 0 2 12 0.1 0.1 1.2 1.2 112 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-121 South Water Treatment Plant pH Analyzer 2002 20 12 1.0 12 2023 2023 0 0 0% 10,000$ Westminster SWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ -$ 100% $ 19,000 950$ 0 5 0 2 7 0.9 0.9 6.3 6.3 113 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-122 South Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Colorimeter Analyzer 2002 2020 20 12 1.0 12 2032 2032 9 9 75% 10,000$ Westminster NWTF 3,500$ 1,200$ 800$ 3,000$ $ 19,000 100%19,000$ 14,250$ 100% $ 19,000 950$ 5 5 8 2 20 0.1 0.1 2.0 2.0 114 9.2 Treatment Plants SWTP-123 South Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer Switch 2002 100 30 1.2 36 2032 2038 9 15 42% 40,000$ Westminster Zone 5 PS 14,000$ 4,800$ 3,200$ 12,000$ $ 74,000 100%74,000$ 30,833$ 50% $ 37,000 3,700$ 0 0 0 2 2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\202210 Combined Asset Inventory Printed on 4/13/2023 8:41 PM Page 3 of 4 4 5 6 A B D E F G J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK AL AM AN AO AP AQ Sp r e a d s h e e t Nu m b e r i n g Ut i l i t y A r e a N u m b e r Utility Area Description Asset Numbering Treatment Process/ Basin / Zone Major Component / Subbasin / Subzone La t e s t F o r m a l C o n d i t i o n As s e s s m e n t Di s c i p l i n e I n s t a l l a t i o n Ye a r Si g n i f i c a n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Ye a r Co d e s f o r U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r C o p i e d V a l u e s Or i g i n a l U s e f u l L i f e Us e f u l L i f e M u l t i p l i e r (a l w a y s 1 . 0 i f cr i t i c a l i t y > 1 3 ) St r e t c h e d U s e f u l L i f e us i n g U s e f u l L i f e Mu l t i p l i e r Ca l c u l a t e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r St r e t c h e d R e p l a c e m e n t Ye a r Re m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e St r e t c h e d R e m a i n i n g Us e f u l L i f e Po r t i o n o f S t r e t c h e d Us e f u l L i f e R e m a i n i n g Capital Replacement Value De s i g n Co n t i n g e n c y (3 5 % ) Ge n e r a l Co n d i t i o n s (1 2 % ) Co n t r a c t o r O& P (8 % ) EL A C (3 0 % ) Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) As s e t A m o u n t C i t y i s Re s p o n s i b l e F o r City -Owned Portion of Total Replacement Project Cost (includes ELAC) Depreciated Value of City- Owned Prorated Cost Re p a i r C o s t F a c t o r Repair Project Cost Annual O&M Prediction Based on City Owned Pro- Rated Capital Cost Vu l n e r a b i l i t y St r e t c h e d V u l n e r a b i l i t y Ri s k St r e t c h e d R i s k 35 % 12 % 8%30 % Pu b l i c H e a l t h & S a f e t y Ef f e c t o n Op e r a t i o n s En v i r o n m e nt Co s t o f Re p a i r Ov e r a l l [ Σ ] Criticality First Available Budget Year= 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 115 8 Storage Tanks BZST-100 Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Structure 2010 1982 120 40 1.0 40 2023 2023 0 0 0% 300,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 105,000$ 36,000$ 24,000$ 90,000$ $ 555,000 100%555,000$ -$ 33% $ 184,000 11,100$ 5 5 4 4 18 0.9 0.9 16.2 16.2 116 8 Storage Tanks BZST-100 Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Exterior Coatings 2010 1982 30 14 1.0 14 2023 2023 0 0 0% 67,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 23,450$ 8,040$ 5,360$ 20,100$ $ 124,000 100%124,000$ -$ 100% $ 124,000 -$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 117 8 Storage Tanks BZST-100 Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Interior Coatings 2010 1982 5 8 1.0 8 2023 2023 0 0 0% 51,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 17,850$ 6,120$ 4,080$ 15,300$ $ 95,000 100%95,000$ -$ 100% $ 95,000 -$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 118 8 Storage Tanks BZST-101 Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Piping 1982 2019 90 25 1.0 25 2044 2044 21 21 84% 5,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 1,750$ 600$ 400$ 1,500$ $ 10,000 100%10,000$ 8,400$ 50% $ 5,000 200$ 0 5 4 2 11 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 119 8 Storage Tanks BZST-102 Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Mechanical Access and Safety 1982 70 20 1.2 24 2023 2023 0 0 0% 5,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 1,750$ 600$ 400$ 1,500$ $ 10,000 100%10,000$ -$ 75% $ 8,000 800$ 5 5 0 2 12 0.9 0.9 10.8 10.8 120 8 Storage Tanks BZST-103 Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Tank Mixers 2021 70 25 1.0 25 2046 2046 23 23 92% 55,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 19,250$ 6,600$ 4,400$ 16,500$ $ 102,000 100%102,000$ 93,840$ 100% $ 102,000 8,160$ 5 5 0 4 14 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 121 8 Storage Tanks YZST-100 Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Structure 2010 2005 120 40 1.0 40 2045 2045 22 22 55% 300,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 105,000$ 36,000$ 24,000$ 90,000$ $ 555,000 100%555,000$ 305,250$ 33% $ 184,000 11,100$ 5 5 4 4 18 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 122 8 Storage Tanks YZST-101 Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Exterior Coatings 2010 2005 30 14 1.0 14 2023 2023 0 0 0% 67,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 23,450$ 8,040$ 5,360$ 20,100$ $ 124,000 100%124,000$ -$ 100% $ 124,000 -$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 123 8 Storage Tanks YZST-102 Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Interior Coatings 2010 2005 5 8 1.0 8 2023 2023 0 0 0% 51,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 17,850$ 6,120$ 4,080$ 15,300$ $ 95,000 100%95,000$ -$ 100% $ 95,000 -$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 124 8 Storage Tanks YZST-103 Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Piping 2005 2019 90 25 1.0 25 2044 2044 21 21 84% 5,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 1,750$ 600$ 400$ 1,500$ $ 10,000 100%10,000$ 8,400$ 50% $ 5,000 200$ 0 5 4 2 11 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 125 8 Storage Tanks YZST-104 Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Mechanical Access and Safety 2005 70 20 1.2 24 2025 2029 2 6 25% 5,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 1,750$ 600$ 400$ 1,500$ $ 10,000 100%10,000$ 2,500$ 75% $ 8,000 800$ 5 5 0 2 12 0.7 0.1 8.4 1.2 126 8 Storage Tanks YZST-105 Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Tank Mixers 2023 70 25 1.0 25 2048 2048 25 25 100% 55,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 19,250$ 6,600$ 4,400$ 16,500$ $ 102,000 100%102,000$ 102,000$ 100% $ 102,000 8,160$ 5 5 0 4 14 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 127 8 Storage Tanks GZST-100 Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Structure 2010 2005 120 40 1.0 40 2045 2045 22 22 55% 300,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 105,000$ 36,000$ 24,000$ 90,000$ $ 555,000 100%555,000$ 305,250$ 33% $ 184,000 11,100$ 5 5 4 4 18 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 128 8 Storage Tanks GZST-101 Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Exterior Coatings 2010 2005 30 14 1.0 14 2023 2023 0 0 0% 67,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 23,450$ 8,040$ 5,360$ 20,100$ $ 124,000 100%124,000$ -$ 100% $ 124,000 -$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 129 8 Storage Tanks GZST-102 Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Interior Coatings 2010 2005 5 8 1.0 8 2023 2023 0 0 0% 51,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 17,850$ 6,120$ 4,080$ 15,300$ $ 95,000 100%95,000$ -$ 100% $ 95,000 -$ 0 5 0 4 9 0.9 0.9 8.1 8.1 130 8 Storage Tanks GZST-103 Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Piping 2005 2019 90 25 1.0 25 2044 2044 21 21 84% 5,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR 1,750$ 600$ 400$ 1,500$ $ 10,000 100%10,000$ 8,400$ 50% $ 5,000 200$ 0 5 4 2 11 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 131 8 Storage Tanks GZST-104 Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Mechanical Access and Safety 2005 70 20 1.2 24 2025 2029 2 6 25% 5,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR $ 1,750 $ 600 $ 400 $ 1,500 $ 10,000 100%10,000$ 2,500$ 75% $ 8,000 $ 800 5 5 0 2 12 0.7 0.1 8.4 1.2 132 8 Storage Tanks GZST-105 Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Tank Mixers 2021 70 25 1.0 25 2046 2046 23 23 92% 55,000$ Westminster Tank Reclaimed NR $ 19,250 $ 6,600 $ 4,400 $ 16,500 $ 102,000 100%102,000$ 93,840$ 100% $ 102,000 $ 8,160 5 5 0 4 14 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 TOTALS 116,021,000$ $ 40,608,000 $ 13,923,000 $ 9,282,000 $ 34,807,000 $ 214,681,000 100%214,681,000$ Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\202210 Combined Asset Inventory Printed on 4/13/2023 8:41 PM Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/21/2023 By:TPS Description Unconstrained model, if money grew on trees, would replace all assets when industry standard life is exceeded. (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Unconstrained 2023 Unconstrained 2024 Unconstrained 2025 Unconstrained 2026 Unconstrained 2027 Unconstrained 2028 Unconstrained 2029 Unconstrained 2030 Unconstrained 2031 Unconstrained 2032 OUT YEARS $37,777,200 $0 $502,000 $0 $324,000 $500,000 $0 $853,000 $0 $612,000 $202,732,000 2008 $ 234,000 2023 new 234,000$ keep 234,000$ 2015 $ 7,618,400 2023 new 7,618,400$ keep 7,618,400$ 2008 $ 22,000 2023 new 22,000$ keep 22,000$ 2008 $ 250,000 2023 new 250,000$ keep 250,000$ 2008 $ 234,000 2023 new 234,000$ keep 234,000$ 2008 $ 1,092,000 2023 new 1,092,000$ keep 1,092,000$ 2008 $ 1,092,000 2023 new 1,092,000$ keep 1,092,000$ 2008 $ 234,000 2023 new 234,000$ keep 234,000$ 2008 $ 628,000 2023 new 628,000$ keep 628,000$ 2008 $ 1,092,000 2023 new 1,092,000$ keep 1,092,000$ 2008 $ 47,000 2023 new 47,000$ keep 47,000$ 2008 $ 190,000 2023 new 190,000$ keep 190,000$ Town $ 40,000 2023 new 40,000$ keep 40,000$ TM $ 1,720,000 2023 new 1,720,000$ keep 1,720,000$ TM $ 1,060,000 2023 new 1,060,000$ keep 1,060,000$ TM $ 198,000 2023 new 198,000$ keep 198,000$ TM $ 330,000 2023 new 330,000$ keep 330,000$ $ 1,998,000 2023 new 1,998,000$ keep 1,998,000$ $ 1,410,000 2023 new 1,410,000$ keep 1,410,000$ $ 1,292,500 2023 new 1,292,500$ keep 1,292,500$ $ 1,093,000 2023 new 1,093,000$ keep 1,093,000$ $ 61,000 2023 new 61,000$ keep 61,000$ $ 3,300,000 2023 new 3,300,000$ keep 3,300,000$ $184,000 $ 555,000 2023 repair 184,000$ keep 184,000$ $ 317,000 2023 new 317,000$ keep 317,000$ WEP $ 450,000 2023 new 450,000$ keep 450,000$ WEP $ 1,000,000 2023 new 1,000,000$ keep 1,000,000$ WEP $ 1,000,000 2023 new 1,000,000$ keep 1,000,000$ $ 51,300 2023 new 51,300$ keep 51,300$ $ 45,000 2023 new 45,000$ keep 45,000$ Policy WEP $ 215,000 2023 new 215,000$ keep 215,000$ Waterline Improvements for Fraser Ave (550 LF x $2,350 / LF) Waterline Improvements for Eastom Ave (465 LF x $2,350 / LF) Rate Study (Assume 2023 and 2028) Meter Testing and Replacement (assume 100 replaced per year $450 per meter) Leak Prevention and Replacement (assume $100,000 per year for 10 years) Looping Dead Ends (assume $250,000 per year for years 2025-2028) Water System Model Updates Water Efficiency Plan Install New North Water Treatment Plant Booster Pump Replace Transite Pipe that serves the out-of-town homes in Byers Peak Ranch. Red Zone Pump Station Updates (Pumps, Pressure Gauges, PLC, SCADA and Antennas) Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Piping (50 LF 2" steel) Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters (Wolverine, Badger, Ermine, Ferret) Waterline Improvements for Quail Drive North-South System Exchange Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave (850 LF x $2,350 / LF) Waterline Improvements for Eisenhower Dr (600 LF x $2,350 / LF) Surface Water Treatment Plant (2026 Water Quality Testing, Environmental Investigations, 2027 Land Acquisition, 2031 Construction) - St. Louis Creek Planning and preliminary engineering design required to determine the quantity of additional treated water storage required for potential Blue Zone Tank expansion. Replacement distribution system loop between Eisenhower, HWY 40, and Fraser Avenue. North-South System Connection - Conceptual Design Phase for issue with water rights/augmentation. WATER FUND Utility Area Description Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year Water System High Priority and Good Ideas Supply Planning and preliminary engineering for developing St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension Water rights for non-potable supply. Siting and design of additional water supply well for Fraser System well field. Drilling, construction and testing of additional water supply well. Planning and preliminary engineering to fully augment the Fraser System Well field by developing required upstream storage for exchange and augmentation. Site selection, planning, and preliminary engineering design for Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) Phase I-Possible Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) Phase II-Possible Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) Distribution System Replace distribution pipeline in southeast corner (Elk Creek Drive to Old Victory Road) of Town to meet fire flow requirements. Additional 500,000 gallon Blue Zone Storage Tank to meet maximum day plus fire flow demand. Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Unconstrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/21/202312:05 PM 1 of 6 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Unconstrained 2023 Unconstrained 2024 Unconstrained 2025 Unconstrained 2026 Unconstrained 2027 Unconstrained 2028 Unconstrained 2029 Unconstrained 2030 Unconstrained 2031 Unconstrained 2032 OUT YEARS WATER FUND Utility Area Description 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Storage Tanks Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Structure $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2023 2023 new 16.2 555,000$ keep 555,000$ Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 $ 124,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 124,000$ keep 124,000$ Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 95,000$ keep 95,000$ Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Piping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0.2 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Mechanical Access and Safety $ 8,000 $ 10,000 2023 2023 new 10.8 10,000$ keep 10,000$ Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,000 $ 102,000 2046 2046 new 0.0 102,000$ keep $ 102,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Structure $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2045 2045 new 0.4 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 $ 124,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 124,000$ keep 124,000$ Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 95,000$ keep 95,000$ Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Piping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0.2 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Mechanical Access and Safety $ 8,000 $ 10,000 2025 2025 new 8.4 10,000$ keep 10,000$ Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,000 $ 102,000 2048 2048 new 0.0 102,000$ keep $ 102,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Structure $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2045 2045 new 0.4 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 $ 124,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 124,000$ keep 124,000$ Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 95,000$ keep 95,000$ Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Piping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0.2 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Mechanical Access and Safety $ 8,000 $ 10,000 2025 2025 new 8.4 10,000$ keep 10,000$ Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,000 $ 102,000 2046 2046 new 0.0 102,000$ keep $ 102,000 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Unconstrained Model Water System - R1 4/13/20239:04 PM 2 of 6 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Unconstrained 2023 Unconstrained 2024 Unconstrained 2025 Unconstrained 2026 Unconstrained 2027 Unconstrained 2028 Unconstrained 2029 Unconstrained 2030 Unconstrained 2031 Unconstrained 2032 OUT YEARS WATER FUND Utility Area Description 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Pump Stations Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Building, including stairwell $ 153,000 $ 463,000 2055 2055 new 0.2 463,000$ keep $ 463,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Building HVAC $ 62,000 $ 185,000 2025 2025 new 2.8 185,000$ keep 185,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump G1, 15 HP $ 9,000 $ 12,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 12,000$ keep 12,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump G2, 15 HP $ 9,000 $ 12,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 12,000$ keep 12,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump Station Valves and Piping $ 417,000 $ 555,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 555,000$ keep 555,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2025 2025 new 4.9 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station PLC $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 93,000$ keep 93,000$ Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 56,000$ keep $ 56,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 0.2 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station SCADA and Antennas $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 37,000$ keep 37,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Building $ 153,000 $ 463,000 2055 2055 new 0.2 463,000$ keep $ 463,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Building HVAC $ 62,000 $ 185,000 2025 2025 new 2.8 185,000$ keep 185,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R1, 1.5 HP $ 3,000 $ 4,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 4,000$ keep 4,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R2, 7.5 HP $ 6,000 $ 8,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 8,000$ keep 8,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R3, 7.5 HP $ 6,000 $ 8,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 8,000$ keep 8,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R4, 326 HP $ 111,000 $ 148,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 148,000$ keep 148,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump Station Valves and Piping $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2045 2045 new 0.1 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2025 2025 new 6.3 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station PLC $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 93,000$ keep 93,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 56,000$ keep $ 56,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 0.2 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station SCADA and Antennas $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 37,000$ keep 37,000$ Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Hydrostatic Storage Tanks $ 56,000 $ 74,000 2025 2025 new 7.7 74,000$ keep 74,000$ Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Unconstrained Model Water System - R1 4/13/20239:04 PM 3 of 6 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Unconstrained 2023 Unconstrained 2024 Unconstrained 2025 Unconstrained 2026 Unconstrained 2027 Unconstrained 2028 Unconstrained 2029 Unconstrained 2030 Unconstrained 2031 Unconstrained 2032 OUT YEARS WATER FUND Utility Area Description 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 Treatment Plants Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Building, 20'x20' $ 90,000 $ 272,000 2048 2048 new 0.1 272,000$ keep $ 272,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Storage Sheds (x2) $ 62,000 $ 185,000 2048 2048 new 0.1 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant HVAC Fan and Heater $ 7,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Clearwell, 20'x20' $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2048 2048 new 0.5 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant 6"/8" Valves and Piping $ 162,000 $ 324,000 2023 2023 new 12.6 324,000$ keep 324,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 6.3 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 1, 30 HP $ 46,000 $ 61,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 61,000$ keep 61,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 30 HP $ 46,000 $ 61,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 61,000$ keep 61,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ Valve Box $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Chemical Chlorine Addition $ 37,000 $ 111,000 2041 2041 new 6.3 111,000$ keep $ 111,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Chemical Soda Ash Addition $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 93,000$ keep 93,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Radionucleide Treatment $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 93,000$ keep 93,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Air Diffuser Assembly $ 49,000 $ 65,000 2043 2043 new 9.9 65,000$ keep $ 65,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2028 2028 new 0.8 185,000$ keep 185,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2028 2028 new 3.8 185,000$ keep 185,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2028 2028 new 3.2 56,000$ keep 56,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant PLC/HMI $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2033 2033 new 16.2 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant SCADA System $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2032 2032 new 10.8 37,000$ keep 37,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant pH Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Colorimeter Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2032 2032 new 18.0 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2028 2028 new 0.4 74,000$ keep 74,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Building, 32'x22.5' $ 110,000 $ 333,000 2052 2052 new 0.1 333,000$ keep $ 333,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant HVAC Fan and Heater $ 7,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Clearwell, 32'x22.5' $ 214,000 $ 648,000 2052 2052 new 0.6 648,000$ keep $ 648,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant 6"/8" Valves and Piping $ 162,000 $ 324,000 2027 2027 new 12.6 324,000$ keep 324,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Unconstrained Model Water System - R1 4/13/20239:04 PM 4 of 6 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Unconstrained 2023 Unconstrained 2024 Unconstrained 2025 Unconstrained 2026 Unconstrained 2027 Unconstrained 2028 Unconstrained 2029 Unconstrained 2030 Unconstrained 2031 Unconstrained 2032 OUT YEARS WATER FUND Utility Area Description 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 1, 40 HP $ 54,000 $ 71,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 71,000$ keep 71,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 40 HP $ 54,000 $ 71,000 2023 2023 new 8.1 71,000$ keep 71,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ Valve Box $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 1.8 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Chemical Chlorine Addition $ 37,000 $ 111,000 2041 2041 new 6.3 111,000$ keep $ 111,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Chemical Soda Ash Addition $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 93,000$ keep 93,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Radionucleide Treatment $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 93,000$ keep 93,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Air Diffuser Assembly $ 49,000 $ 65,000 2023 2023 new 9.9 65,000$ keep 65,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2032 2032 new 0.8 185,000$ keep 185,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2032 2032 new 3.8 185,000$ keep 185,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2032 2032 new 3.2 56,000$ keep 56,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant PLC/HMI $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2033 2033 new 16.2 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant SCADA System $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2032 2032 new 10.8 37,000$ keep 37,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant pH Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Colorimeter Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2032 2032 new 18.0 19,000$ keep 19,000$ Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2032 2032 new 0.4 74,000$ keep 74,000$ Raw Water System Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 1 Fraser Well No. 1 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2037 2037 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 1 Fraser Well No. 1 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 2 Fraser Well No. 2 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2036 2036 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 2 Fraser Well No. 2 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 3b Fraser Well No. 3b Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2036 2036 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 3b Fraser Well No. 3b Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 5 Fraser Well No. 5 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2023 new 18.0 370,000$ keep 370,000$ Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 5 Fraser Well No. 5 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 7 Fraser Well No. 7 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2037 2037 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 7 Fraser Well No. 7 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 8 Fraser Well No. 8 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2034 2034 new 1.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 8 Fraser Well No. 8 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 9 Fraser Well No. 9 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2036 2036 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 9 Fraser Well No. 9 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Age unknown 3126 LF at $785/LF $ 3,405,000 $ 4,540,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 4,540,000$ keep $ 4,540,000 Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") install 2010-2015 3126 LF at $785/LF $ 3,405,000 $ 4,540,000 2070 2070 new 1.0 4,540,000$ keep $ 4,540,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 1 Maryvale Well No. 1 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2023 new 18.0 370,000$ keep 370,000$ Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 1 Maryvale Well No. 1 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 4 Maryvale Well No. 4 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2023 new 18.0 370,000$ keep 370,000$ Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 4 Maryvale Well No. 4 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 5 Maryvale Well No. 5 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2023 new 18.0 370,000$ keep 370,000$ Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 5 Maryvale Well No. 5 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 7 Maryvale Well No. 7 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2023 new 18.0 370,000$ keep 370,000$ Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 7 Maryvale Well No. 7 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Age unknown 2976 LF at $785/LF $ 3,242,000 $ 4,322,000 2062 2062 new 1.0 4,322,000$ keep $ 4,322,000 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Unconstrained Model Water System - R1 4/13/20239:04 PM 5 of 6 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Unconstrained 2023 Unconstrained 2024 Unconstrained 2025 Unconstrained 2026 Unconstrained 2027 Unconstrained 2028 Unconstrained 2029 Unconstrained 2030 Unconstrained 2031 Unconstrained 2032 OUT YEARS WATER FUND Utility Area Description 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 Water Dist Sys & PRVs W Dist Sys & PRVs Potable Transmission Transmission Line (>12") Age unknown 3977 LF at $1020/LF $ 5,629,000 $ 7,505,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 7,505,000$ keep $ 7,505,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs Potable Distribution Distribution Line (<=12") Age unknown 118730 LF at $785/LF $ 129,320,000 $ 172,426,000 2035 2035 new 0.3 172,426,000$ keep $ 172,426,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 1 - 6" Pressure Relief at Wapiti - ABANDONED Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2023 2023 new 6.3 93,000$ keep 93,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 1 - 6" Pressure Relief at Wapiti - ABANDONED Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2023 2023 new 16.2 139,000$ keep 139,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 2 - 6" Pressure Relief at Elk Ranch Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 2 - 6" Pressure Relief at Elk Ranch Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2030 new 16.2 139,000$ keep 139,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 3 - 6" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd.Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 3 - 6" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd.Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2030 new 16.2 139,000$ keep 139,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 4 - 8" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd., South Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 4 - 8" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd., South Valves & Piping $ 79,000 $ 158,000 2030 2030 new 16.2 158,000$ keep 158,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 5 - 6" Pressure Relief at Discovery (Green/Yellow)Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 5 - 6" Pressure Relief at Discovery (Green/Yellow)Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2030 new 16.2 139,000$ keep 139,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 6 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Green)Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 6 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Green)Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2030 new 16.2 139,000$ keep 139,000$ W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 7 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Red/Green)Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 7 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Red/Green)Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2030 new 16.2 139,000$ keep 139,000$ Master Meters Master Meters & Shop Potable Meters Potable meters and meter pit $ 3,734,000 $ 3,734,000 2023 2023 new - 3,734,000$ keep 3,734,000$ Notes: 1 Source of Item. 2008 = Water Supply Master Plan (Brown and Caldwell), TM = Technical Memorandum Summary of Capital Improvements Projects for 2023 Budget Cycle (Merrick, August 4, 2022), WEP = Water Efficiency Plan (Merrick, in progress), 2015 = Fraser Firming Study (JRS, 2015) Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Unconstrained Model Water System - R1 4/13/20239:04 PM 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/21/2023 By:TPS Descriptio Constrained model, (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Constrained 2023 Constrained 2024 Constrained 2025 Constrained 2026 Constrained 2027 Constrained 2028 Constrained 2029 Constrained 2030 Constrained 2031 Constrained 2032 OUT YEARS $ 2,006,300 $ 1,809,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 1,921,000 $ 4,135,400 $ 1,657,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 1,744,000 $ 9,121,000 $ 1,671,500 $ 215,895,000 2008 $ 234,000 2026 new 234,000$ keep 234,000$ 2015 keep 200,000$ 1,742,400$ 5,676,000$ 2008 $ 22,000 2024 new 22,000$ keep 22,000$ 2008 $ 250,000 2024 new 250,000$ keep 250,000$ 2008 $ 234,000 2025 new 234,000$ keep 234,000$ 2008 $ 1,092,000 2028 new 1,092,000$ keep 1,092,000$ 2008 $ 1,092,000 2030 new 1,092,000$ keep 1,092,000$ 2008 $ 234,000 2032 new 234,000$ keep 234,000$ 2008 $ 628,000 2025 new 628,000$ keep 628,000$ 2008 $ 1,092,000 2026 new 1,092,000$ keep 1,092,000$ 2008 $ 47,000 2024 new 47,000$ keep 47,000$ 2008 $ 190,000 2030 new 190,000$ keep 190,000$ Town $ 40,000 2024 new 40,000$ keep 40,000$ TM $ 1,720,000 2023 new 1,720,000$ keep 1,720,000$ TM $ 1,060,000 2024 new 1,060,000$ keep 1,060,000$ TM $ 198,000 2025 new 198,000$ keep 198,000$ TM $ 330,000 2025 new 330,000$ keep 330,000$ $ 1,998,000 2027 new 1,998,000$ keep 1,998,000$ $ 1,410,000 2029 new 1,410,000$ keep 1,410,000$ $ 1,292,500 2032 new 1,292,500$ keep 1,292,500$ $ 1,093,000 2033 new 1,093,000$ keep $ 1,093,000 $ 61,000 2024 new 61,000$ keep 61,000$ $ 3,300,000 2031 new 3,300,000$ keep 3,300,000$ $184,000 $ 555,000 2024 repair 184,000$ keep 184,000$ $ 317,000 2030 new 317,000$ keep 317,000$ WEP 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ WEP 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ WEP 2023 new -$ keep 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ $ 51,300 2023 new 51,300$ keep 51,300$ $ 45,000 2028 new 45,000$ keep 45,000$ Policy WEP 2023 new -$ keep 90,000$ 125,000$ Red Zone Pump Station Updates (Pumps, Pressure Gauges, PLC, SCADA and Antennas) Red Zone Pump Station Valves and Piping (50 LF 2" steel) Surface Water Treatment Plant (2026 Water Quality Testing, Environmental Investigations, 2027 Land Acquisition, 2031 Construction) - St. Louis Creek Water System High Priority and Good Ideas Site selection, planning, and preliminary engineering design for Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) Phase I-Possible Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) Phase II-Possible Construction of Forest Meadows Augmentation Reservoir. (Elk Creek) Planning and preliminary engineering for developing St. Louis Creek Enlargement and Extension Water rights for non-potable supply. Siting and design of additional water supply well for Fraser System well field. Replace distribution pipeline in southeast corner (Elk Creek Drive to Old Victory Road) of Town to meet fire flow requirements. Additional 500,000 gallon Blue Zone Storage Tank to meet maximum day plus fire flow demand. Planning and preliminary engineering design required to determine the quantity of additional treated water storage required for potential Blue Zone Tank expansion. Waterline Improvements for Eisenhower Dr (600 LF x $2,350 / LF) Planning and preliminary engineering to fully augment the Fraser System Well field by developing required upstream storage for exchange and augmentation. Supply Water Efficiency Plan Waterline Improvements for Fraser Ave (550 LF x $2,350 / LF) All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year Rate Study (Assume 2023 and 2028) Replacement distribution system loop between Eisenhower, HWY 40, and Fraser Avenue. Drilling, construction and testing of additional water supply well. WATER FUND Utility Area Description Distribution System Meter Testing and Replacement (assume 100 replaced per year $450 per meter) Leak Prevention and Replacement (assume $100,000 per year for 10 years) Waterline Improvements for Quail Drive Looping Dead Ends (assume $250,000 per year for years 2026-2029) Water System Model Updates North-South System Exchange Install New North Water Treatment Plant Booster Pump Replace Transite Pipe that serves the out-of-town homes in Byers Peak Ranch. Waterline Improvements for Eastom Ave (465 LF x $2,350 / LF) North-South System Connection - Conceptual Design Phase for issue with water rights/augmentation. Byers Avenue Waterline Improvements Waterline Improvements for Mill Ave (850 LF x $2,350 / LF) Waterline Improvements for Furry Critters (Wolverine, Badger, Ermine, Ferret) Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Constrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/21/202312:08 PM 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/13/2023 By:TPS Descriptio Constrained model, (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Constrained 2023 Constrained 2024 Constrained 2025 Constrained 2026 Constrained 2027 Constrained 2028 Constrained 2029 Constrained 2030 Constrained 2031 Constrained 2032 OUT YEARS $ 2,006,300 $ 2,414,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 2,154,600 $ 4,135,400 $ 1,657,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 886,000 $ 10,213,000 $ 1,437,500 $ 215,895,000 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year WATER FUND Utility Area Description 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Storage Tanks Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Structure $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2023 2033 new 16.2 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 $ 124,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 124,000$ keep $ 124,000 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 95,000$ keep $ 95,000 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Piping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0.2 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Mechanical Access and Safety $ 8,000 $ 10,000 2023 2033 new 10.8 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Blue Zone Storage Tank 1 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,000 $ 102,000 2046 2046 new 0.0 102,000$ keep $ 102,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Structure $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2045 2045 new 0.4 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 $ 124,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 124,000$ keep $ 124,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 95,000$ keep $ 95,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Piping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0.2 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Mechanical Access and Safety $ 8,000 $ 10,000 2025 2033 new 8.4 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Yellow Zone Storage Tank 0.3 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,000 $ 102,000 2046 2046 new 0.0 102,000$ keep $ 102,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Structure $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2045 2045 new 0.4 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Exterior Coatings $ 124,000 $ 124,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 124,000$ keep $ 124,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Interior Coatings $ 95,000 $ 95,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 95,000$ keep $ 95,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Piping $ 5,000 $ 10,000 2044 2044 new 0.2 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Mechanical Access and Safety $ 8,000 $ 10,000 2025 2033 new 8.4 10,000$ keep $ 10,000 Storage Tanks Green Zone Storage Tank 0.5 MG Tank Mixers $ 102,000 $ 102,000 2046 2046 new 0.0 102,000$ keep $ 102,000 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Constrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/14/20239:55 AM 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/13/2023 By:TPS Descriptio Constrained model, (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Constrained 2023 Constrained 2024 Constrained 2025 Constrained 2026 Constrained 2027 Constrained 2028 Constrained 2029 Constrained 2030 Constrained 2031 Constrained 2032 OUT YEARS $ 2,006,300 $ 2,414,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 2,154,600 $ 4,135,400 $ 1,657,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 886,000 $ 10,213,000 $ 1,437,500 $ 215,895,000 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year WATER FUND Utility Area Description 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 Pump Stations Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Building, including stairwell $ 153,000 $ 463,000 2055 2033 new 0.2 463,000$ keep $ 463,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Building HVAC $ 62,000 $ 185,000 2025 2033 new 2.8 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump G1, 15 HP $ 9,000 $ 12,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 12,000$ keep $ 12,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump G2, 15 HP $ 9,000 $ 12,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 12,000$ keep $ 12,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pump Station Valves and Piping $ 417,000 $ 555,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2025 2033 new 4.9 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station PLC $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 56,000$ keep $ 56,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 0.2 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Green Zone Booster Pump Station SCADA and Antennas $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 37,000$ keep $ 37,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Building $ 153,000 $ 463,000 2055 2055 new 0.2 463,000$ keep $ 463,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Building HVAC $ 62,000 $ 185,000 2025 2033 new 2.8 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R1, 1.5 HP $ 3,000 $ 4,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 4,000$ keep $ 4,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R2, 7.5 HP $ 6,000 $ 8,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 8,000$ keep $ 8,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R3, 7.5 HP $ 6,000 $ 8,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 8,000$ keep $ 8,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump R4, 326 HP $ 111,000 $ 148,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 148,000$ keep $ 148,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pump Station Valves and Piping $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2045 2045 new 0.1 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station PLC $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2035 2035 new 0.1 56,000$ keep $ 56,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2035 2035 new 0.2 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station SCADA and Antennas $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 37,000$ keep $ 37,000 Pump Stations Red Zone Booster Pump Station Hydrostatic Storage Tanks $ 56,000 $ 74,000 2025 2033 new 7.7 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Constrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/14/20239:55 AM 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/13/2023 By:TPS Descriptio Constrained model, (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Constrained 2023 Constrained 2024 Constrained 2025 Constrained 2026 Constrained 2027 Constrained 2028 Constrained 2029 Constrained 2030 Constrained 2031 Constrained 2032 OUT YEARS $ 2,006,300 $ 2,414,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 2,154,600 $ 4,135,400 $ 1,657,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 886,000 $ 10,213,000 $ 1,437,500 $ 215,895,000 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year WATER FUND Utility Area Description 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 Treatment Plants Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Building, 20'x20' $ 90,000 $ 272,000 2048 2048 new 0.1 272,000$ keep $ 272,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Storage Sheds (x2) $ 62,000 $ 185,000 2048 2048 new 0.1 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant HVAC Fan and Heater $ 7,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Clearwell, 20'x20' $ 184,000 $ 555,000 2048 2048 new 0.5 555,000$ keep $ 555,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant 6"/8" Valves and Piping $ 162,000 $ 324,000 2023 2033 new 12.6 324,000$ keep $ 324,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 1, 30 HP $ 46,000 $ 61,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 61,000$ keep $ 61,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 30 HP $ 46,000 $ 61,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 61,000$ keep $ 61,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ Valve Box $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Chemical Chlorine Addition $ 37,000 $ 111,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 111,000$ keep $ 111,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Chemical Soda Ash Addition $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Radionucleide Treatment $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Air Diffuser Assembly $ 49,000 $ 65,000 2023 2033 new 9.9 65,000$ keep $ 65,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2028 2033 new 0.8 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2028 2033 new 3.8 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2028 2033 new 3.2 56,000$ keep $ 56,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant PLC/HMI $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 16.2 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant SCADA System $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2023 2033 new 10.8 37,000$ keep $ 37,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant pH Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Colorimeter Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants North Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2028 2033 new 0.4 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Building, 32'x22.5' $ 110,000 $ 333,000 2048 2048 new 0.1 333,000$ keep $ 333,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant HVAC Fan and Heater $ 7,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Clearwell, 32'x22.5' $ 214,000 $ 648,000 2048 2048 new 0.6 648,000$ keep $ 648,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant 6"/8" Valves and Piping $ 162,000 $ 324,000 2023 2033 new 12.6 324,000$ keep $ 324,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Pressure Gauges $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant 6" Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 1, 40 HP $ 54,000 $ 71,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 71,000$ keep $ 71,000 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Constrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/14/20239:55 AM 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/13/2023 By:TPS Descriptio Constrained model, (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Constrained 2023 Constrained 2024 Constrained 2025 Constrained 2026 Constrained 2027 Constrained 2028 Constrained 2029 Constrained 2030 Constrained 2031 Constrained 2032 OUT YEARS $ 2,006,300 $ 2,414,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 2,154,600 $ 4,135,400 $ 1,657,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 886,000 $ 10,213,000 $ 1,437,500 $ 215,895,000 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year WATER FUND Utility Area Description 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Pump No. 2, 40 HP $ 54,000 $ 71,000 2023 2033 new 8.1 71,000$ keep $ 71,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant 6" Gate Valve w/ Valve Box $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 1.8 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Chemical Chlorine Addition $ 37,000 $ 111,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 111,000$ keep $ 111,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Chemical Soda Ash Addition $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Radionucleide Treatment $ 31,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Air Diffuser Assembly $ 49,000 $ 65,000 2023 2033 new 9.9 65,000$ keep $ 65,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Generator $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2028 2033 new 0.8 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant MCC $ 93,000 $ 185,000 2028 2033 new 3.8 185,000$ keep $ 185,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Quick Disconnect $ 28,000 $ 56,000 2028 2033 new 3.2 56,000$ keep $ 56,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant PLC/HMI $ 93,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 16.2 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant SCADA System $ 37,000 $ 37,000 2023 2033 new 10.8 37,000$ keep $ 37,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant pH Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Colorimeter Analyzer $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Treatment Plants South Water Treatment Plant Auto Transfer Switch $ 37,000 $ 74,000 2028 2033 new 0.4 74,000$ keep $ 74,000 Raw Water System Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 1 Fraser Well No. 1 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 1 Fraser Well No. 1 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 2 Fraser Well No. 2 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 2 Fraser Well No. 2 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 3b Fraser Well No. 3b Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 3b Fraser Well No. 3b Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 5 Fraser Well No. 5 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 5 Fraser Well No. 5 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 7 Fraser Well No. 7 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 7 Fraser Well No. 7 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 8 Fraser Well No. 8 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2034 2034 new 1.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 8 Fraser Well No. 8 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 9 Fraser Well No. 9 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Fraser Well No. 9 Fraser Well No. 9 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Age unknown 3126 LF at $785/LF $ 3,405,000 $ 4,540,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 4,540,000$ keep $ 4,540,000 Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") install 2010-2015 3126 LF at $785/LF $ 3,405,000 $ 4,540,000 2070 2070 new 1.0 4,540,000$ keep $ 4,540,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 1 Maryvale Well No. 1 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 1 Maryvale Well No. 1 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 4 Maryvale Well No. 4 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 4 Maryvale Well No. 4 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 5 Maryvale Well No. 5 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 5 Maryvale Well No. 5 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 7 Maryvale Well No. 7 Pump, Piping, and Electrical $ 278,000 $ 370,000 2023 2033 new 18.0 370,000$ keep $ 370,000 Raw Water Sys Maryvale Well No. 7 Maryvale Well No. 7 Mag Meter $ 15,000 $ 19,000 2040 2040 new 0.4 19,000$ keep $ 19,000 Raw Water Sys Raw Water Transmission Transmission Line (4" to 8") Age unknown 2976 LF at $785/LF $ 3,242,000 $ 4,322,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 4,322,000$ keep $ 4,322,000 Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Constrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/14/20239:55 AM 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Date:4/13/2023 By:TPS Descriptio Constrained model, (Red = Risk greater than 12, Orange = Risk between 6 and 12, Green = Risk less than 6) Source of Item1 Repair Cost New Cost Database Replacement Year Chosen Budget Start Year Repair or New?Risk Budgeted Amount Defer or Keep Project? Constrained 2023 Constrained 2024 Constrained 2025 Constrained 2026 Constrained 2027 Constrained 2028 Constrained 2029 Constrained 2030 Constrained 2031 Constrained 2032 OUT YEARS $ 2,006,300 $ 2,414,000 $ 1,535,000 $ 2,154,600 $ 4,135,400 $ 1,657,000 $ 1,805,000 $ 886,000 $ 10,213,000 $ 1,437,500 $ 215,895,000 All Dollars are Shown as 2022 Dollars Regardless of the Expenditure Year WATER FUND Utility Area Description 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 Water Dist Sys & PRVs W Dist Sys & PRVs Potable Transmission Transmission Line (>12") Age unknown 3977 LF at $1020/LF $ 5,629,000 $ 7,505,000 2035 2035 new 1.0 7,505,000$ keep $ 7,505,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs Potable Distribution Distribution Line (<=12") Age unknown 118730 LF at $785/LF $ 129,320,000 $ 172,426,000 2035 2035 new 0.3 172,426,000$ keep $ 172,426,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 1 - 6" Pressure Relief at Wapiti - ABANDONED Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2023 2033 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 1 - 6" Pressure Relief at Wapiti - ABANDONED Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2023 2033 new 16.2 139,000$ keep $ 139,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 2 - 6" Pressure Relief at Elk Ranch Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 2 - 6" Pressure Relief at Elk Ranch Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2035 new 16.2 139,000$ keep $ 139,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 3 - 6" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd.Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 3 - 6" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd.Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2035 new 16.2 139,000$ keep $ 139,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 4 - 8" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd., South Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 4 - 8" Pressure Relief at Old Victory Rd., South Valves & Piping $ 79,000 $ 158,000 2030 2035 new 16.2 158,000$ keep $ 158,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 5 - 6" Pressure Relief at Discovery (Green/Yellow)Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 5 - 6" Pressure Relief at Discovery (Green/Yellow)Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2035 new 16.2 139,000$ keep $ 139,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 6 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Green)Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 6 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Green)Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2035 new 16.2 139,000$ keep $ 139,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 7 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Red/Green)Vault Structure $ 47,000 $ 93,000 2045 2045 new 6.3 93,000$ keep $ 93,000 W Dist Sys & PRVs PRV 7 - 6" Pressure Relief at Pioneer (Red/Green)Valves & Piping $ 70,000 $ 139,000 2030 2035 new 16.2 139,000$ keep $ 139,000 Master Meters Master Meters & Shop Potable Meters Potable meters and meter pit $ 3,734,000 $ 3,734,000 2023 2033 new 0 3,734,000$ keep $ 3,734,000 Notes: 1 Source of Item. 2008 = Water Supply Master Plan (Brown and Caldwell), TM = Technical Memorandum Summary of Capital Improvements Projects for 2023 Budget Cycle (Merrick, August 4, 2022), WEP = Water Efficiency Plan (Merrick, in progress), 2015 = Fraser Firming Study (JRS, 2015) Q:\Denver_North\Projects\1166-00 Fraser 10-yr Water System CIP Report\DESIGN\Asset Inventory_Merrick\Constrained Model Water System - R1.xlsx 4/14/20239:55 AM 6 of 6 TOWN OF GRANBY NORTH SERVICE AREA ENTERPRISE FUNDS WATER AND SEWER PLANT INVESTMENT FEES ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2023-11-14A TOWN OF GRANBY NORTH SERVICE AREA (NORTH OF THE FRASER RIVER) WATER PLANT INVESTMENT FEES (PIFS) CHECK PAYABLE TO THE TOWN OF GRANBY PO BOX 440 GRANBY, CO 80446 located at Zero and Jasper Avenue 970 887-2501 ADOPTED Actual ACTUAL ACTUAL 2024 2023 2020-2022 2019 3/4" service line (single family residence) $9,977.06 $8,675.70 $7,887.00 $7,887.00 1 " service line $16,980.47 $14,765.63 $13,423.30 $13,423.30 1 1/4" service line $26,676.45 $23,196.91 $21,088.10 $21,088.10 1 1/2" service line $38,422.10 $33,410.52 $30,373.20 $30,373.20 2 " service line $68,304.55 $59,395.26 $53,995.69 $53,995.69 Greater than 2" negotiated on a case by case basis with the Town. Out of town fees are 1.5 times higher. Raw Water pifs when available are 75% of above fees Sewer Plant investment fees CHECK PAYABLE to Granby Sanitation District PO Box 560 Granby, CO 80446 located at 3493 Grand County Road 57 Granby, CO 80446 970 887-2052 Monday-Thursday 2023-2024 2020-2022 2019 1 sfe (single family residence) PER SFE $9,690.00 8,500.00$ 8,500.00$ Granby Sanitation will review plans, stamp, and calculate sfe schedule available upon request WATER AND SEWER SERVICE RATES ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2023-11-14A TOWN OF GRANBY NORTH SERVICE AREA (NORTH OF THE FRASER RIVER) Water usage and facility charges per quarter billed and payable to the Town of Granby ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL 2024 2023 2022 2021/2020 2019 Water Usage in-town 12.47 per thousand gallons $8.16 $6.62 $6.62 $6.62 Water Usage out-of-town 24.94 per thousand gallons $16.32 $13.24 $13.24 $13.24 Raw water usage in-town 6.24 per thousand gallons $4.08 $3.52 $3.52 $3.52 Facility charge - all meters 298.66 per quarter per meter $195.41 $86.85 $65.00 $54.63 Construction water rate 40.00 per thousand gallons 40 16.50 $15.00 $15.00 Sewer usage fees billed by and payable to the Granby Sanitation District 10/20/2023 Sewer fee $111.00 /qtr/sfe (single family equivalent) 96.00 $96.00 Granby Sanitation District is a separate special district. All inquiries should be made to them 970 887-2052. This is informational only . prepared by Greg Hansen, Finance Director 10/18/2023 S:BUDGET/water TOWN OF GRANBY NORTH SERVICE AREA WATER P. 0. BOX 440 GRANBY, COLORADO 80446 (970) 887-2501 TAP FEE AGREEMENT NAME BILLING ADDRESS P.O.Box City State Zip HOME PHONE WORK.PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS _ NUMBER OF TAPS/SFE PIPE SIZE _ (calculated by the Town for the Authority) (to be determined by applicants Engineer) It is the owner's obligation to pay the costs and expenses associated with, but not limited, water meters, curb stops, tap installation, materials and labor incurred for installation of such water requirements. These costs are above and beyond the Plant Investment Fee (PIF). SINGLE FAMILY HOME $9,977.06 I, ,understand that upon payment of a tap fee I will be subject to monthly facility, water charges, to begin the month the Tap Fee Agreement is signed. I also understand that I will receive a quarterly statement (three months of facility fee and water charges per quarter) which is due by the 15th day of February, May, August, and November. Failure to pay my water bill may result in a penalty of $50 and/or the disconnection of my water service. Signature Date AMOUNT RECEIVED $----- Check No. BY Account Number: Entered to Caselle: ------ TOWN OF GRANBY SOUTH SERVICE AREA ENTERPRISE FUNDS PIF PAYMENTS TO OTHER ENTITIES ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2023-11-14B TOWN OF GRANBY SOUTH SERVICE AREA ENTERPRISE PLANT INVESTMENT FEES (PIFS) (SOUTH OF THE FRASER RIVER - INCLUDES GRANBY RANCH, GRAND ELK, and SCW&S DISTRICT) Water and Sewer p.i.f.s for future and replacement plant and other infrastructure CHECK PAYABLE to the Town of Granby PO Box 440 970 887-2501 ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL located in Town Hall at the Town of Granby Zero Jasper Avenue 2024 2023 22-19 FEE 1 sfe (single family residence) water and sewer $11,252.00 $9,112.00 $8,284.00 sfe schedule available upon request Water pif only is $7,744 and Sewer only $3,508 PROPOSED for 2024 to total the $11,252. Sewer Treatment Plant Investment fees CHECK PAYABLE to Granby Sanitation District PO Box 560 Granby, CO 80446 located at 3493 Grand County Road 57 Granby, CO 80446 970 887-2052 9a.m.-4pm M-Th 1 sfe (single family residence) PER SFE 9,690.00$ 8,500.00$ Granby Sanitation will review plans, stamp, and calculate sfe schedule available upon request WATER AND SEWER SERVICE RATES ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2023-11-14B TOWN OF GRANBY SOUTH SERVICE AREA & GRANBY SAN DISTRICT RATES (SOUTH OF THE FRASER RIVER - INCLUDES GRANBY RANCH AND GRAND ELK) South Service Area water and sewer usage fees billed and payable to the Town of Granby 2024 2020-2023 2019 Town of Granby Water service rate $66.63 per sfe per quarter $66.63 $66.63 Town of Granby Sewer service rate $41.51 per sfe per quarter $41.51 $41.51 System Water Service fee (Town/SCWS) $54.65 per sfe per quarter $54.65 $54.65 System Sewer Service fee (Town/SCWS) $9.80 per sfe per quarter $9.80 $9.80 Water Treatment Plant Facility Fee * $35.18 per sfe per quarter $35.18 $35.18 Granby Sanitation District * $111.00 per sfe per quarter $111.00 $96.00 Total service usage fees $318.77 per sfe per quarter $318.77 $303.77 DeBerard Draw Fee * (only for those served) $55.00 per sfe per quarter $55.00 $55.00 Construction Water same as NSA $40.00 per 1,000 gallons 40.00/1,000 15.00/1,000 The Town of Granby then reimburses: The Granby Sanitation District for service fees billed and collected by the Town that are assessed by the District. The Town of Granby is not proposing to raise any SERVICE fees for 2024. It is proposing a 23% increase in plant investment fees and construction water is $40.00 per 1,000 gallons. ghansen 10/18/23 TOWN OF GRANBY SOUTH SERVICE AREA ENTERPRISE FUNDS P. 0. BOX 440 GRANBY, COLORADO 80446 (970) 887-2501 TAP FEE AGREEMENT NAME BILLING ADDRESS P.O.Box City State Zip HOME PHONE WORK.PHONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION STREET ADDRESS _ NUMBER OF TAPS/SFE PIPE SIZE _ (calculated by the Town for the Authority) (to be determined by applicants Engineer) It is the owner's obligation to pay the costs and expenses associated with, but not limited, water meters, curb stops, tap installation, materials and labor incurred for installation of such water requirements. These costs are above and beyond the Plant Investment Fee (PIF). SINGLE FAMILY HOME $11,252.00 I, ,understand that upon payment of a tap fee I will be subject to monthly facility, water charges, to begin the month the Tap Fee Agreement is signed. I also understand that I will receive a quarterly statement (three months of facility fee and water charges per quarter) which is due by the 15th day of February, May, August, and November. Failure to pay my water bill may result in a penalty of $50 and/or the disconnection of my water service. Signature Date AMOUNT RECEIVED $----- Check No. BY Account Number: Entered to Caselle: ------ SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER TAP FEES AND CHARGES A. Single Family Residential Unit Note: If a residence has a second kitchen, then the fees and charges will be assessed per Part B of Schedule. A kitchen is generally defined as an area having facilities for cooking and dish washing. Units designed or converted to Bed & Breakfast will be reviewed and assessed individually. 1. Water Tap Privilege a) Unit connection, labor, materials, any District approved plumber; your expense, plus road repair. $8000.00 b) Monthly Service Charge (usually billed quarterly) $ 19.25 2. Sewer Tap Privilege a) Unit connection (as above) $8000.00 b) Monthly Service charge (as above) 19.25 Both Water & Sewer service charge- $38.50/month OR $115.50/quarter Note: Each tap requires a $45.00 inspection fee, paid at time of tap purchase. B. Multiple Residential Units Duplexes, apartments, condos, townhouses, guesthouse, "mother in law" apartments, many Bed & Breakfast, pools, special landscape treatments, commercial laundry. 1. Water Tap Privilege a) Unit connection, labor, materials, District approved plumber, your expense, plus road repair. First Unit $8000.00 Each additional Unit 8000.00 b) Monthly Service Charge per unit 19.25 2. Sewer Tap Privilege a) Unit connection (as above) b) Monthly Service Charge per Unit First Unit Each additional Unit $8000.00 8000.00 19.25 Note: Each tap requires a $45.00 inspection fee, paid at time of tap purchase. C. Taps Paid But Not Used Where tap fees have been received by the District for one or more units to be serviced, those services are guaranteed and are a call on capacity of the present system. Therefore, the District charges full service fees for each tap fee reserved. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com MEMO TO:Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM:Sarah Catanzarite, Assistant Town Manager DATE:January 3, 2024 SUBJECT:Modification of Victoria Village Protected Natural Area (PNA) and Application to Colorado Headwaters Land Trust MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Consideration of how to move forward with needed modifications of the Victoria Village Protected Natural Area for purposes of a bridge crossing over the St Louis Creek. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Resolution 2024-01-02 authorizing Town staff to move forward with an application to the Colorado Headwaters Land Trust to request they hold and manage a conservation easement for a modified Protected Natural Area on the Victoria Village property. BACKGROUND: The Victoria Village property which was purchased by the Town in May of 2022 for a community workforce housing project includes a Protected Natural Area of 2.59 acres that consists of a section of the St. Louis Creek and surrounding wetland habitat. The PNA was originally established in 2012 with deed restrictions as part of wetland mitigation for wetland fill on site under the United States Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) Permit SPK-2007-01908. Deed restrictive covenants for the PNA prohibit most activities including excavation and construction activities. The covenants include consideration for municipal utilities and a mechanism for amending the PNA deed restrictions if consistent with Corps guidelines at time of amendment. The Town is working with Grand Environmental to request to the USACE that modifications to the PNA be allowed to facilitate a bridge crossing of the St Louis Creek for the proposed road that will run through the Victoria Village development (and other asks as outlined in the Victoria Village PNA Brief found in packet). Grand Environmental and the Town had a pre-application consultation meeting with the USACE with a positive response. As part of proposed changes to the PNA, we are seeking to modify PNA boundaries to exclude the area for the proposed bridge (see Appendix A map sheets) but slightly expand overall PNA area. We are also seeking to include consideration for limited, low-standard foot trails (no bikes), develop a long-term utility management plan for existing utilities, and stabilize and enhance the creek corridor to improve fish habitat and functional values. Town of Fraser PO Box 370, Fraser, CO 80442 office 970-726-5491 fax 970-726-5518 www.frasercolorado.com As part of this PNA modification process, we have consulted with Colorado Headwaters Land Trust (CHLT) regarding the possibility of CHLT holding and managing the conservation easement for the proposed modified Protected Natural Area. If an application from the Town of Fraser was accepted by the CHLT Board, a legal agreement between the Town and CHLT would be established, which would perpetually limit uses of the land in order to protect the conservation values. CHLT would assist in defining and establishing the conservation easement for the modified Protected Natural Area and would be responsible for ongoing monitoring, management, and reporting of the conservation easement. The conservation easement for the modified PNA would serve as part of our application with the USACE for modification of the current PNA and required permits for construction of the needed bridge. ALTERNATIVES: The Town could continue to manage the PNA as before but with amendments and be responsible for all monitoring and reporting to the Corps as required by the covenants of the PNA/ conservation easement. The Town could work with the Colorado Headwaters Land Trust to establish, hold, and monitor the Conservation Easement for the PNA. Lastly, the Town could seek to transfer the PNA to another entity (not yet defined) who would hold and manage the conservation easement for the PNA. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution 2024-01-02 enabling staff to pursue an application with the Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, requesting that they take on the conservation easement for the Victoria Village PNA, If successful this would ensure the PNA be conserved as intended and properly managed for the years to come, and would aid in our application with the USACE to modify the existing PNA and covenants so as to allow for construction of the bridge and other modifications sought. TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01-02 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TOWN STAFF TO MOVE FORWARD WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE COLORADO HEADWATERS LAND TRUST FOR THE VICTORIA VILLAGE PROTECTED NATURAL AREA WHEREAS,a Protected Natural Area was established on the Victoria Village property in 2012 with deed restricted covenants; and WHEREAS,the Town of Fraser purchased the Victoria Village property in May 2022 for a community workforce housing project; and WHEREAS,the Town of Fraser is seeking to modify the Protected Natural Area on the property with the US Army Corps of Engineer so as to enable permitting for construction of a needed bridge crossing over the St.Louis Creek for a proposed road through the Victoria Village property and other asks; and WHEREAS,the Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a well-respected entity for holding and managing conservation easements in Grand County; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: The Town of Fraser Board of Trustees authorizes Town staff to move forward with an application to the Colorado Headwaters Land Trust to hold and manage a conservation easement on the Victoria Village Protected Natural Area to ensure the land is properly conserved and managed in the years to come,and to help facilitate needed permitting for a bridge crossing over the St Louis Creek. READ, PASSED ON ROLL CALL VOTE, AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF January 2024. Votes in favor: ___BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk 12/18/2023 1 Project Brief RE: Protected Natural Area Victoria Village Property, Fraser, CO Prepared for the Town of Fraser Board of Trustees December 18, 2023 a) Town of Fraser developing Victoria Village property for attainable workforce housing b) Need to re-plat entire property including PNA associated with 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit c) Propose to maintain, significantly expand, and better protect PNA conservation values d) See Appendix A for detailed Sheet 1 Initial Compilation seen here Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 1) Proposal to Amend Victoria Village “Protected Natural Area” (PNA) 1 2 12/18/2023 2 2) Project Location – Municipal Property in Fraser, CO •Property located within Fraser town limits at intersection of Grand County Road 8 with US Hwy 40 •Map location 39.94963˚N, -105.81651˚W within NE ¼ of Section 19, T1S, R75W •Property includes ~740 linear feet of St. Louis Creek, flowing SW to NE east toward the Fraser River Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 3) Protected Natural Area (PNA) a) PNA established 2012 with deed restrictions a) Wetland mitigation for wetland fill on site under USACE Permit SPK-2007-01908 b) Wetland ponds created (~1:1 ratio) compensatory mitigation c) Protection of other wetlands and uplands (~10:1 ratio?) to keep creek and wetlands in “substantially natural condition forever” b) Deed restrictive covenants a) Prohibit most excavation and construction activities b) Include considerations for municipal utilities c) Include mechanism to amend PNA deed restrictions if consistent with Corps guidelines at time of amendment c) Specific monitoring, maintenance, and reporting requirements consistent with standard General Conditions for all USACE Nationwide Permits See Appendix B for detail on 2012 PNA establishment and Appendix C for detail on requirements Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 3 4 12/18/2023 3 2012 wetland mitigation pond, early season, with survey stakes for water level monitoring Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Natural marsh (?) with shallow groundwater study well and pond stake 4) PNA Photos – wetlands during highwater creek flows 5) PNA Photos – existing bridge and creek setting Existing restrictive covenants prohibit bridge replacement within PNA Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 St Louis Creek looking upstream to bridge, early season NOTE very narrow riparian fringe floodplain at Plot8 5 6 12/18/2023 4 6) PNA Photos – St. Louis Creek Creek middle reach, looking upstream, NOTE straight, ditch-like channel with heavy bank erosion on photo right Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Creek lower reach, looking downstream showing better conditions a) Modify PNA boundary to better fit existing conditions, with net increased protected area b) Develop long-term plan for existing water-transmission lines within PNA under new USACE permit c) Increase creek-riparian functional values, including floodplain connectivity and wetlands, under new USACE permit d) Secure conservation protections, regular monitoring, and management as needed See Appendix A for Sheet 4 seen here Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 7) Proposed PNA Amendments 7 8 12/18/2023 5 8) Proposed PNA Amendments Proposed PNA AmendmentsExisting PNA Under 2012 Deed Restrictions Expand PNA to ~2.8 acres, adjust outline to better protect stream corridor, and abandon original internal lot lines, (see Sheet 4 in Slide 4 above) PNA now covers ~2.6 acres originally platted for residential development (see Sheet 1 in Slide 1 above) Protect 2012 mitigations, make sure additional site enhancements do not degrade that work Includes 2012 wetland mitigations including compensatory wetland creation and protective deed restrictions Maintain 2012 restrictions per 2012 USACE agreement but allow for certain well-articulated site enhancements consistent with USACE guidelines Deed restrictions preclude most construction and land-management activities Develop detailed, citizen-science-friendly monitoring program with professional oversight, reporting, and community-based adaptive management (trash pickup, willow plantings, etc) 2012 requirements for monitoring, reporting, and adaptive management consistent with USACE General Conditions for NWP29 for Residential Developments Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 9) Proposed PNA Amendments (Continued) Proposed PNA Under New “Real Estate Instrument”Challenges Under PNA Deed Restrictions Adjust perimeter to put bridge area outside PNAOld bridge crosses creek within PNA but deed restrictions preclude repair or replacement; bridge needed for property development Develop long-term utility management plan to be permitted under USACE Nationwide Permit 3 (NWP3) for maintenance Municipal water transmission lines cross PNA parallel to creek, likely affecting local shallow groundwater Stabilize and enhance creek corridor to improve functional values, including fishery, floodway, riparian wetlands, to be permitted under USACE NWP27 Creek channel and banks are eroding, limiting fishery habitat and floodway capacity Consider limited, low-standard trails to guide and contain foot traffic, no bikes No formal trails within PNA, and creek corridor will be attractive area post development Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 9 10 12/18/2023 6 10) Required Elements in PNA Covenants Per 33 CFR 332 §332.4 a) Site protection (real estate) instrument b) Baseline information c) Consideration of mitigation credits d) Work plan e) Monitoring plan with ecological performance standards f) Long-term adaptive management plan g) Financial assurances See Appendix C for more detail Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 11) Possible Real Estate Instruments Consistent with Existing PNA Deed Restrictions Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Site Work as NeededConservation Responsibilities – activity oversight, monitoring, and reporting PNA Ownership Possible Real Estate Instruments Fraser staff, contractors, volunteers? Fraser staff, contractors, volunteers?FraserContinue PNA management as before but with amendments Fraser staff, contractors, CHLT contractors as needed, volunteers? CHLT with community-based monitoring program? FraserConservation Easement with Colorado Headwaters Land Trust (CHLT) ?Other entityOther entityTransfer to other entity 11 12 12/18/2023 7 12) St. Louis Creek “Citizen Science” Program Upper Colorado Watershed Environment Team (UCWET) working with the Fraser Library to develop a community- friendly program to monitor and document conditions along St. Louis Creek Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 St. Louis Creek at Fraser Library On Victory Village Property 13) Propose Creek Enhancements Per USFS Reference Reach St. Louis Creek looking downstream on same afternoon, with Victoria Village reach on left compared to reference reach on right. NOTE wider floodplain on USFS reach but similar bed materials, bank vegetation, flow. Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 On Victoria Village Property On USFS National Forest 13 14 12/18/2023 8 14) Initial Creek Assessment – Victoria Village Vs. Reference Reach •Victoria Village study reaches are compared to proposed reference reach ~3 miles upstream at the USFS St. Louis Creek Campground •Standard rapid assessment according to Natural Resources Conservation Service Stream Visual Assessment Protocol V2 (NRCS 2009) Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 St Louis Creek Reference Reach 15) Initial Creek Assessment – Victoria Village Vs Reference Reach •Assessment performed for consultation with USACE + CO Parks and Wildlife •SVAP2 incorporates elements of stream channel, floodplain, riparian, and fishery along with influences higher in the watershed •Reference Reach conditions rate good, Victoria Village reaches rate poor to fair Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 SVAP2 Rating: Good Poor Poor Fair 15 16 12/18/2023 9 16) Propose “Nested Channel” Per USDA NRCS 2009 •Nested stream channels offer fish and wildlife habitat and stream capacity at different stream flows •FEMA floodplain benefits •Figure from Natural Resources Conservation Service, Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 2 (SVAP2) training webinar June 2023 Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 17) USACE Permit Considerations for PNA Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Mitigation Required? PCN Required? Proposal within permitting limits? Corps Permit*Management Actions NANANARespect 2012 permitting, amendments to be consistent with present USACE guidelines 1) Amend PNA area No?No?YesNWP3 for Maintenance2) Develop utility emergency response plan No?YesYesTo be replaced outside PNA under NWP14 for Linear Transportation Projects 3) Replace bridge NANANAWetlands can be avoided4) Build low-standard trails NoYesYesNWP27 for Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Enhancement, and Establishment Activities 5) Improve functional values in St Louis Creek corridor *Corps Nationwide Permits (NWPs) downloaded October 2023 17 18 12/18/2023 10 18) Consultation •Michael Brack, Town Manager •970-531-9686 •mbrack@town.fraser.co.us •Sarah Catanzarite, Assistant Town Manager •970-531-9930 •scatanzarite@town.fraser.co.us •Kent Whitmer, The Whitmer Law Firm LLC •Jeremy Krones, Colorado Headwaters Land Trust •Ben Wilson, US Army Corps of Engineers •Jon Ewart, Colorado Parks and Wildlife •Geoffrey Elliott, Grand Environmental •970-509-0199 •geoff@grandenvironmental.com Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 19 12/18/2023 1 Project Brief RE: Protected Natural Area Victoria Village Property, Fraser, CO Prepared for the Town of Fraser Board of Trustees December 18, 2023 a) Town of Fraser developing Victoria Village property for attainable workforce housing b) Need to re-plat entire property including PNA associated with 2012 US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit c) Propose to maintain, significantly expand, and better protect PNA conservation values d) See Appendix A for detailed Sheet 1 Initial Compilation seen here Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 1) Proposal to Amend Victoria Village “Protected Natural Area” (PNA) 1 2 12/18/2023 2 2) Project Location – Municipal Property in Fraser, CO •Property located within Fraser town limits at intersection of Grand County Road 8 with US Hwy 40 •Map location 39.94963˚N, -105.81651˚W within NE ¼ of Section 19, T1S, R75W •Property includes ~740 linear feet of St. Louis Creek, flowing SW to NE east toward the Fraser River Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 3) Protected Natural Area (PNA) a) PNA established 2012 with deed restrictions a) Wetland mitigation for wetland fill on site under USACE Permit SPK-2007-01908 b) Wetland ponds created (~1:1 ratio) compensatory mitigation c) Protection of other wetlands and uplands (~10:1 ratio?) to keep creek and wetlands in “substantially natural condition forever” b) Deed restrictive covenants a) Prohibit most excavation and construction activities b) Include considerations for municipal utilities c) Include mechanism to amend PNA deed restrictions if consistent with Corps guidelines at time of amendment c) Specific monitoring, maintenance, and reporting requirements consistent with standard General Conditions for all USACE Nationwide Permits See Appendix B for detail on 2012 PNA establishment and Appendix C for detail on requirements Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 3 4 12/18/2023 3 2012 wetland mitigation pond, early season, with survey stakes for water level monitoring Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Natural marsh (?) with shallow groundwater study well and pond stake 4) PNA Photos – wetlands during highwater creek flows 5) PNA Photos – existing bridge and creek setting Existing restrictive covenants prohibit bridge replacement within PNA Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 St Louis Creek looking upstream to bridge, early season NOTE very narrow riparian fringe floodplain at Plot8 5 6 12/18/2023 4 6) PNA Photos – St. Louis Creek Creek middle reach, looking upstream, NOTE straight, ditch-like channel with heavy bank erosion on photo right Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Creek lower reach, looking downstream showing better conditions a) Modify PNA boundary to better fit existing conditions, with net increased protected area b) Develop long-term plan for existing water-transmission lines within PNA under new USACE permit c) Increase creek-riparian functional values, including floodplain connectivity and wetlands, under new USACE permit d) Secure conservation protections, regular monitoring, and management as needed See Appendix A for Sheet 4 seen here Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 7) Proposed PNA Amendments 7 8 12/18/2023 5 8) Proposed PNA Amendments Proposed PNA AmendmentsExisting PNA Under 2012 Deed Restrictions Expand PNA to ~2.8 acres, adjust outline to better protect stream corridor, and abandon original internal lot lines, (see Sheet 4 in Slide 4 above) PNA now covers ~2.6 acres originally platted for residential development (see Sheet 1 in Slide 1 above) Protect 2012 mitigations, make sure additional site enhancements do not degrade that work Includes 2012 wetland mitigations including compensatory wetland creation and protective deed restrictions Maintain 2012 restrictions per 2012 USACE agreement but allow for certain well-articulated site enhancements consistent with USACE guidelines Deed restrictions preclude most construction and land-management activities Develop detailed, citizen-science-friendly monitoring program with professional oversight, reporting, and community-based adaptive management (trash pickup, willow plantings, etc) 2012 requirements for monitoring, reporting, and adaptive management consistent with USACE General Conditions for NWP29 for Residential Developments Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 9) Proposed PNA Amendments (Continued) Proposed PNA Under New “Real Estate Instrument”Challenges Under PNA Deed Restrictions Adjust perimeter to put bridge area outside PNAOld bridge crosses creek within PNA but deed restrictions preclude repair or replacement; bridge needed for property development Develop long-term utility management plan to be permitted under USACE Nationwide Permit 3 (NWP3) for maintenance Municipal water transmission lines cross PNA parallel to creek, likely affecting local shallow groundwater Stabilize and enhance creek corridor to improve functional values, including fishery, floodway, riparian wetlands, to be permitted under USACE NWP27 Creek channel and banks are eroding, limiting fishery habitat and floodway capacity Consider limited, low-standard trails to guide and contain foot traffic, no bikes No formal trails within PNA, and creek corridor will be attractive area post development Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 9 10 12/18/2023 6 10) Required Elements in PNA Covenants Per 33 CFR 332 §332.4 a) Site protection (real estate) instrument b) Baseline information c) Consideration of mitigation credits d) Work plan e) Monitoring plan with ecological performance standards f) Long-term adaptive management plan g) Financial assurances See Appendix C for more detail Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 11) Possible Real Estate Instruments Consistent with Existing PNA Deed Restrictions Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Site Work as NeededConservation Responsibilities – activity oversight, monitoring, and reporting PNA Ownership Possible Real Estate Instruments Fraser staff, contractors, volunteers? Fraser staff, contractors, volunteers?FraserContinue PNA management as before but with amendments Fraser staff, contractors, CHLT contractors as needed, volunteers? CHLT with community-based monitoring program? FraserConservation Easement with Colorado Headwaters Land Trust (CHLT) ?Other entityOther entityTransfer to other entity 11 12 12/18/2023 7 12) St. Louis Creek “Citizen Science” Program Upper Colorado Watershed Environment Team (UCWET) working with the Fraser Library to develop a community- friendly program to monitor and document conditions along St. Louis Creek Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 St. Louis Creek at Fraser Library On Victory Village Property 13) Propose Creek Enhancements Per USFS Reference Reach St. Louis Creek looking downstream on same afternoon, with Victoria Village reach on left compared to reference reach on right. NOTE wider floodplain on USFS reach but similar bed materials, bank vegetation, flow. Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 On Victoria Village Property On USFS National Forest 13 14 12/18/2023 8 14) Initial Creek Assessment – Victoria Village Vs. Reference Reach •Victoria Village study reaches are compared to proposed reference reach ~3 miles upstream at the USFS St. Louis Creek Campground •Standard rapid assessment according to Natural Resources Conservation Service Stream Visual Assessment Protocol V2 (NRCS 2009) Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 St Louis Creek Reference Reach 15) Initial Creek Assessment – Victoria Village Vs Reference Reach •Assessment performed for consultation with USACE + CO Parks and Wildlife •SVAP2 incorporates elements of stream channel, floodplain, riparian, and fishery along with influences higher in the watershed •Reference Reach conditions rate good, Victoria Village reaches rate poor to fair Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 SVAP2 Rating: Good Poor Poor Fair 15 16 12/18/2023 9 16) Propose “Nested Channel” Per USDA NRCS 2009 •Nested stream channels offer fish and wildlife habitat and stream capacity at different stream flows •FEMA floodplain benefits •Figure from Natural Resources Conservation Service, Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 2 (SVAP2) training webinar June 2023 Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 17) USACE Permit Considerations for PNA Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 Mitigation Required? PCN Required? Proposal within permitting limits? Corps Permit*Management Actions NANANARespect 2012 permitting, amendments to be consistent with present USACE guidelines 1) Amend PNA area No?No?YesNWP3 for Maintenance2) Develop utility emergency response plan No?YesYesTo be replaced outside PNA under NWP14 for Linear Transportation Projects 3) Replace bridge NANANAWetlands can be avoided4) Build low-standard trails NoYesYesNWP27 for Aquatic Habitat Restoration, Enhancement, and Establishment Activities 5) Improve functional values in St Louis Creek corridor *Corps Nationwide Permits (NWPs) downloaded October 2023 17 18 12/18/2023 10 18) Consultation •Michael Brack, Town Manager •970-531-9686 •mbrack@town.fraser.co.us •Sarah Catanzarite, Assistant Town Manager •970-531-9930 •scatanzarite@town.fraser.co.us •Kent Whitmer, The Whitmer Law Firm LLC •Jeremy Krones, Colorado Headwaters Land Trust •Ben Wilson, US Army Corps of Engineers •Jon Ewart, Colorado Parks and Wildlife •Geoffrey Elliott, Grand Environmental •970-509-0199 •geoff@grandenvironmental.com Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 18, 2023 19 Pre‐Application Consultation Appendix B Wetland Easement Considerations for Protected Natural Area, Victoria Village Project in Fraser Colorado, Updated 24Oct23 A) Detail summarized here for Wetland Easement Recorded 2012 – The wetland easement area includes St Louis Creek and associated riparian wetlands, other wetlands, and uplands, some of which were designated for mitigating loss of Wetlands A&B in ERC Mitigation Plan dated 17Aug2012 under Corps Permit SPK‐2007‐01908 as modifed December 8, 2010. GES observations May‐October 2023 are consistent with the ERC mitigation installation. B) Restrictive Covenants Declared as “Prohibitions” in the 2012 Protected Natural Area Easement (see attached) include: 1. No filling, draining, flooding, dredging, impounding, clearing, burning, cutting or destroying vegetation, cultivating, excavation, mining, extracting, erecting, construction, releasing wastes, otherwise doing any work on the property; 2. Grazing or keeping cattle, sheep, horses, or other livestock; 3. Introducing exotic species into the Property (except biological control preapproved in writing by the Corps), changing the grade or elevation, impairing the flow or circulation of water, reducing the reach of waters; 4. Any other discharge or activity requiring a permit under clean water or water pollution control laws and regulations, as amended. C) Specifically exempt from the Restrictive Covenants are: 5. Mitigations as provided in the [2012 CRC Mitigation Plan] of the Corps Permit #SPK‐ 2007‐1908 including associated special conditions 6. Removal or trimming of hazardous vegetation such as timber downed or damaged due to natural disaster 7. Those activities authorized in accordance with the Corps permit and mitigation plan (ERC 17Aug2012) D) Other Notes: 8. Activities within established right of ways (within waters of the US) will require prior Corps authorizations and shall be restored to pre‐construction condition as specified in any Corps permits. 9. Amendment – modifications of the restrictive covenants may be recorded as agreed in writing between Corps and Declarant (property owner). Changes will be consistent with Corps policy at the time of amendment. Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970‐509‐0199 * Updated October 24, 2023 * Page 2 of 2 10. Notice to Corps will be made 60 days in advance of amending restrictions or conveyance of interest in the property. 11. Corps to perform compliance inspections 12. Marking of property – easement area to be marked with permanent signage saying “Protected Natural Area” or equivalent. For more detail see 2012 Easement Declaration of Restrictive Covenants attached below. RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 1 OF 7, R $41.00, Additional r00rNa-nes Fee: , , Doc Code:DPC, Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and `itecorder, Colorado *gib ()› DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS STOCOLORADO COUNO GRAND i i5 ECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS is made this 15'" day of August, 2012. by CONDOMINI ESARROLLOS TERRA —NOVA, S.A. DE C.V.("Declarant"). 11 WIIEREAS, D�rant is the owner of certain real property ("real property" includes wetlands, any interest in subrre d lands, uplands, associated riparian/littoral rights) located in Grand County, Colorado, more partiEu'rly described and depicted in Exhibit A ("Property"); and RECITALS WHEREAS, as corer ory mitigation pursuant t0 the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1251, et. seq.) and its implementings ofr Iationsfor Department of the Army Permit No. SP1t-2007-01908 ("Permit"i, issued by the L1.SArm Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District (the "Corps" to include any successor agency), attached Exhibit B, and in recognition of the continuing benefit to the permitted property, and forth protection of waters of the United States and scenic, resource, environmental, and general proper[ lalues, Declarant has agreed to perform certain mitigation and place certain restrictive covenants orcirrie Property, in order that the Property shall remain substantially in its natural condition forever; WHEREAS, the natural condition ofatIVroperty will be restored, enhanced, and preserved pursuant to the mitigation plan ("Mitigatinan) which forms a part of the Permit; and the term "natural condition" shall mean the condition oo •fire Property at the time of the declaration and as restored, enhanced, and preserved pursuant fo the itigation Plan of the Permit; declares t NOW THEREFORE, Declarant hereby ha�the Property shall be held, transferred, conveyed, leased, occupied or otherwise disposed (life used subject to the following restrictive covenants, which shall run with the land and be bindinng n all heirs, successors, assigns ;they are included in the term, "Declarant," below), lessees, or otheirccupiers and users. womb 1. Prohibitions. Declarant is and shall be prohibited frf m e following: filling, draining, flooding, dredging, impounding, clearing, burning, cutting or destroy ng-Legetation. cultivating, excavating, mining, extracting, erecting, constructing, releasing wastes, o�h re 'se doing any work on the Property; grazing or keeping cattle, sheep, horses, or other tivestoe(c; introducing exotic species into the Property (except biological controls preapproved in writing by thE. rps)pand from changing the grade or elevation, impairing the flow or circulation of waters, reducing th reach of waters, and any other discharge or activity requiring a permit under clean water or water polfBlOn control laws and regulations, as amended. The following are expressly exempted from'hlp r`agraph: a) Mitigation as provided pursuant to the Mitigation Plan of the Permit and the associated pecial conditions; b) remova4 or trimming of vegetation hazardous to person or property or oftimber dottyned or damaged due t0 natural disaster and c), those activities authorized in accordance with the Pe rlit`aand MITIGATION PLAN (ERC August 17, 2012) ores otherwise authorized by new Corps permits or work•w thin established utility right -0f ways. Activities within established utility right of ways (within uiat the US) will ham! 6,04t :.I 2.04% Lii0:1:043 1 RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 2 OF 7 Doc Code:DPC, Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and Recorder, Colorado [ ie US) will require prior Corps authorizations and shall be restored to pre -construction condition as Tr et led in any OA permits Amendment After recording, these restrictive covenants may only be amended by a recorded doc en# signed by the Corps and Dedarant. The recorded document, as amended, shall be consistent with the -Sacramento District model conservation restrictions at the time of amendment. Amendment shall beµallowed at the discretion of the Carps, in consultation with resource agencies as appropriate, and thefeersisin exceptional circumstances. Mitigation for amendment impacts will be required pursuant l'atacramento Distract mitigation policy at the time of amendment There shall be no obligatiorfdo allo�r an amendment and actions allowed or required by this document will not require any amendment, iinnci0ding, specifically, the exemptions set forth is paragraph 1 hereinabave. ,10 3. Notice to Corps. A 60 -day advance notification shall be made to the Corps before any action is taken to void or amend t ese restrictive covenants, including conveyance of any interest in, or establishment of an other egai claims over, the Property. 4. Notice to Goverrpn Any permit application, or request for certification or modification, which may affect the Prope ide to any governmental entity with authority over wetlands or other , s� waters of the United States s aIlexpresIy reference and include a copy (with the recording stamp) of these restrictive covenants. `�• 5. Reserved Rights. It is exprvslfy u`yr derstood and agreed that these restrictive covenants da not grant or convey to members of the general public any rights of ownership, entry or use of the Property. These restrictive covenants are created solelyrrfor the protection of the Property, and for the consideration and values set forth above and,Declarant reserves the ownership of the fee simple estate and all rights appertaining thereto, includirtig without limitation the rights to exclude others and to use the property for all purposes not in consistenith these restrictive covenants. 6. Compliance inspections. The Cor , an jtsauthorized agents, shall have the right to enter and go upon the lands of Declarant, inspect the Prop;and take actions necessary to verify compliance with these restrictive covenants. _ 7. Enforcement. To the extent allowed under foe raltaw, Declarant grants to the Corps and/or the U.S. Department of Justice a discretionary right to en cre these restrictive covenants in a judicial action against any person(s) or other entity(ies) violating .tempting to violate these restrictive covenants; provided, however, that no violation of these ressi etive covenants shall result in a forfeiture or reversion of title. This discretionary right shall not be waived b one or more incidents of failure to enforce said right. In any enforcement action, an enforcing ag c shall be entitled to a complete restoration for any violation, as well as any other judicial remer ich as civil penalties. Nothing herein shall limit the right of the Corps to modify, suspend, or revoke the,Per�3 8. Property Transfers. Declarant shalt include the following n�ottii n, all deeds, mortgages, plats, or any other legal instruments used to convey any interest in the Proper +I' failure to comply with this paragraph does not impair the validity or enforceability of these restrictive covenants) NOTICE: This Property Subject to Declaration of Restrictive .overiants Recorded at (insert book and page references, countylies), and date of recoJifingj. 2 RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 3 OF 7 Doc SIP -Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and Recorder, Colorado 415AL j?./ Marking of Property The perrneter of the Property She at ail tisneSde Plaint,/ marked to{ perma+rent signs saying. ' Protected Natural Area." or by an equivalent, permanent marking system. 01, o. Separability Provision. Should any separahle part of these restrictive covenants he held contrary , a:rr the remainder shall continue in full force and effect- WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has duly executed this Declaration of Restrictive Cov riants the date written above. r necL.a.l3.4 CONDOMINIOSt ESARROLLOS TERRA —NOVA, S.A. AE L -V., a.k.a. CONDO INIONS Y EESARROLLOS TERRA —NOVA, 5 A. DE C.V.. a Mex can va 0biecaapital company By: Fteynaido Paniaguh Title: .000: STATE OF COLORADO 0` COUNTY OF GRAND LY ' The foregoing Doeumen as acknowledged before me this �r gray of fig9Uir , 2012. by Reynaldo Paniagua. as LgPa.( gf eclarant, CONDOMINIOSY DESARROLLOSTERRA—NOVA, S A DE C.V.. a.k.a. CONDOMINIONS V DEt0 OS TERRA —NOVA, S.A. DE C.Y. Witness my hand and officioseal. 0r�� My commission expires- 4' # oftaiaL otary Public RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 4 OF 7 Doc Code:DPC, Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and Recorder, Colorado 0 iL 9i q.,4% 6;A 4 9 Ce_de„ Exhibit A Legal Descnption RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 5 OF 7 Doc Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and Recorder, Colorado11 41;g11"1":; ss?i!lxaur5 _ ..- . 117D4 '3yE 40.14 va SIE/ENO ARfM ASV ASKS Code:DPC, . «N1/4c1g raw 1" MEL Ps[ 1r/ I,r U! D lllASS [.P PWY4 Y ISn, swapn, ^1515 • x (DC NEVI i6 SZL• �SYI Y'E a.LhT SDASS a• NE CUR. SEC 19 T1S, R7614, 6TH P.11. FIDAO S' b715. PPS w/ Y-S/t V9R0 YR1559 CAP ARp911Y OWED & STOOPED •5*7 iL . %3171 30.06 MA r W N661Y11 t 1462173.71- 3.4e 41-4, jet\ 40180 1 � •• �, i � 1flR M 7416'wr 4� .6 sa-w yf w `� `� i w N9•15r cjo m`t2m 0 532-04 - -PARK A P{i+- 1.) r.arr•46 0117E11 o. 11.• o' w''SY.0 Mop erh head r N. Wnpelen that be hall lib of *.4.., 1% *1S 117'A..1 Na 15 WK. ss. isY,Y1f% [Rb ,r. ...OR hhs r 110. a 1 -NW/ SRIEY Per q 'MPRo+FLOR %/116/Y PLAT.. Id Y . gubb.l raraw taP.t hw u....Pend y 7M P.r1W. .1 T. r1/4-P4-var tam Now N 5e..d lam 5..I . pbaw Paden rl 4 15. yrl—i-..p w p454 .Qi w.i .n.... 1ti. .d '* ..1 Nabob MIK. Awe 0425M SS-5SI' --141Z-47,10!„ ,,LOWS • P17: a SID2' •36'ao•w 51.46' y_r f11 95R; 755,M1.A55* 771 p7Vbf D6�T 11" „.jorn.Aras EASSIINT Ifer:5A 1LLALZ A (WRTIL✓AI Cr MC PC1 4 Pr SECDON TR! In RTMK sits I.Y. mirror I. FRA5VIR CCUITY Cr CIA sn rr Cr acr ol'ArXt KERV1N.INC (71'7; m R.Ob moc x SURVEYING O.i Ih14-s y}Mill RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 6 OF 7 Doc Code:DPC, Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and Recorder, Colorado gat 9i q.,4% 6;A 5 9 Ce_de„ Exhibit B Corps of Engineers Permit Number SPK-2007-01905 RECEPTION#: 2012006377, 08/28/2012 at 11:14:04 AM, 7 OF 7 Doc Code:DPC, Sara L. Rosene, Grand County Clerk and Recorder, Colorado C? .' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARM ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1325 1 STREET SACRAMENTO CA 95E114.29a r{RYm m -p rem Di Deem her 8.2010 ReguiStory Division SPK-21007-01908 Darid Janlr�son Condomi Dcsarmllos Terra -Nova. S.A. do C.V. Care of: lagisorjvlountain Pro,enics Fraser, CoIdra 0442 Mar Mr. Jaatis We are respond' g a your October 27.2010 request, via Ecological Resource Consultants, Inc., to modify your ��partercnt of the Army permit number SPK-2007-01908. The permit was issued on January 22, R+ "or a commercial mixtd-use devclapment. '1 he project is located on or near San Louis Creel: n Splio r. i9, Township 1 South Range 75 West. Sixth Principal Meridian, Latitude 3995 �l:angitude -105.8177`, Grand County, Colorado. The modification request involves an extrnsrnr 111e construction window - •Permit nunibcrSlPK-2007. 3£ i 902 is hereby modified as follows: The perniiI verification; is • extended to March 18, 2012, whcn•al1T`€ationwide general permits expire. An extension of one year beyond March 18.2012 may e gralAted if earthwork by that time has begun. Please contact our office prior to the expiration date• additional extension es ncx.'dcd. All other teniis and conditions oft t remain in full force and effect. failure to comply with the terms and conditions tf ri aai i thorization may res:r1I in the suspension or revocation of your permit_ �_ Please refer to identification number SFR-2(10-1fl9O8 in any correspondence concealing this project. If you have any questions, please c ntac�icholas Merei at Colorado West Regulatory Branch. 400 Rood Arenue, Room 134r_C,ra d Junction, Colorado 8150 I, email Nick.Mrzei Dilvace.army.rriil. or telephone (97(i) 243 , extension 18. Sin e ely.ft/440 Nicholas A. lir4Hzi • Envi ron nientaiprg i neer 52 North First Street PO Box 1938 Granby, CO 80446 (970) 887-1177 info@coloradoheadwaterslandtrust.org www.coloradoheadwaterslandtrust.org @COheadwatersLT Photo by Susan O. Herpel © Blue Valley Ranch, June 2017 Property Application Packet Table of Contents I. General Information ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Transaction Information .............................................................................................................. 2 III. Property Information .................................................................................................................... 5 IV. Signatures...................................................................................................................................... 12 PO Box 1938, 52 N. First St., Granby, CO 80446 (970) 887-1177 info@coloradoheadwaterslandtrust.org www.coloradoheadwaterslandtrust.org © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 1 I. General Information 1. Property Name Enter the name of the Property (e.g. “Big Valley Ranch Conservation Easement”) ________________________________________________________________________ 2. Phased Conservation Easement Do you intend to protect the property in phases? If yes, please describe: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 3. Landowner Name(s) Provide the name(s) of the Landowner(s), including any entity that has an ownership in- terest in the property (as described in Section III.G., hereinafter, the “Property”). ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Is the Property owned jointly or is it comprised of independently-owned parcels? ________________________________________________________________________ 4. Primary Contact Who should be contacted with questions and decisions regarding the Proposal? Name: ____________________________________________________________ Email: ____________________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ___________________________________________________ City, State, ZIP: ____________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________________________________________________ If the Primary Contact is someone other than the Landowner, please indicate the relation- ship of the Contact to the Landowner (e.g. Ranch Manager, etc.): ________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 2 II. Transaction Information Choose all that apply by marking ‘X’ in the appropriate boxes and fill in descriptions as needed. 1. Conservation Easement A conservation easement is a real estate interest in land and a legal agreement between a landowner and a qualified organization, such as CHLT, which perpetually limits uses of the land in order to protect the conservation values. Each conservation easement is crafted to ad- dress a property’s specific conservation values. A public access agreement is not required for conservation easement proposals. All projects involving conservation easements are required to be monitored annually in order to uphold CHLT’s stewardship responsibility. It is important that landowners develop a clear vision of the future of their property prior to entering any conservation easement or management plan negotiations. Examples of con- servation easements CHLT holds can be found on the CHLT website. i. Purpose or Reasoning for Easement There are multiple reasons that a landowner would want to grant a conservation ease- ment. Please elaborate your reasons for pursuing a conservation easement below: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 3 ii. Building Envelopes A building envelope is an area within a conservation easement boundary which is re- served for existing or future building sites and is subject to the terms and restrictions de- fined by the conservation easement. Please provide a map of the general location of the building envelope. Alternatively, a landowner may choose to exclude a portion of their land from the conservation easement entirely for existing or future building sites. In this case, no por- tion of the building site would be subject to the conservation easement. This would not be a building envelope, but a parcel not included in the conservation easement. This scenario has appraisal implications which should be discussed with an appraiser. Does the Landowner intend to reserve a building envelope? __ YES __ NO If yes, please indicate the number of building envelopes to be reserved and describe the size, approximate location, and intended use (e.g. residence, agricultural structures, new buildings, existing buildings, etc.) to be reserved for each building envelope: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Please describe any ingress/egress access rights associated with building envelopes that will be reserved: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ iii. Larger Parcel Acreage Conservation easement appraisals need to report whether the conservation easement Property is part of a larger parcel owned by the same Landowner, the Landowner’s fam- ily, or a closely related person. Is the Property part of a larger parcel owned by the same Landowner, the Land- owner’s family, or a closely related person? __ YES __ NO If yes, please elaborate: ______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 4 iv. Special Provisions Please describe any special terms, conditions, or reserved uses the Landowner intends to include in the conservation easement (e.g. subdivision, mining, topographical changes, paving roads, commercial use, retail use, and/or industrial use). ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 5 III. Property Information Please provide the following information for the Property: 1. Acreage Indicate the total acres of Property to be considered in this Proposal: ________________ 2. Location/Address Indicate the approximate distance and direction from the nearest town the Property is lo- cated. Additionally, include the Property’s address (if any): ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 3. Township/Range Indicate in which Township and/or Range the Property is located: __________________ 4. Legal Description Accurate and complete legal descriptions are required. Legal descriptions for most Prop- erties can be found in the vesting deed (s). If more than one parcel is involved, include the legal descriptions for each parcel contained in this Proposal. Include any additional legal de- scription information as an attachment to this Proposal. Proposals may be disqualified from the evaluation process if the legal descriptions are incomplete or inaccurate. Enter the accurate and complete legal description of the Property: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 5. Survey Has the Property or any portion of it been surveyed? __ YES __ NO If yes, indicate the year it was completed, and include the survey as an attachment to this Proposal: __________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 6 6. Property Improvements Please list all improvements contained on the Property (e.g. residential structures, agricul- tural structures, irrigation delivery systems, etc.): ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ 7. Property Status Is the Property currently listed or advertised for sale? __ YES __ NO If yes, indicate the listed price (per acre) and how long it has been on the market: ___________________________________________________________________________ 8. Appraisal Has the Property, or any portion of it, been appraised in the past 5 years? __ YES __ NO If yes, indicate the year it was completed and appraised value (per acre), and include the appraisal summary as an attachment to this Proposal: ___________________________________________________________________________ 9. Purchase and Sale Agreement Would the Landowner(s) be willing to keep the Property off the market while the Pur- chase and Sale Agreement is being negotiated? __ YES __ NO 10. Title Encumbrances Has a title report or commitment been completed on the Property or any portion of it in the past 5 years? __ YES __ NO List any title encumbrances on the Property that may affect the conservation values or the proposed real estate transaction: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 7 11. Subdivision, Planning, or Development Is the real estate transfer contemplated by this Proposal part of any subdivision, planning, or development process, contract, or requirement? __ YES __ NO If yes, please explain: ______________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 12. Physical Address Physical access is required so a CHLT representative can access the property annually for the monitoring visit. Physical access means one can physically get to the Property. Is there physical access to the Property? __ YES __ NO 13. Legal Access Legal access is the legal right for ingress and egress to the Property via public road or via legal right-of-way across an adjacent landowner’s property. Do not presume access has been granted or secured across any private, federal, tribal, or state-owned lands without legal documentation. It is the landowner’s responsibility to pro- vide documentation of or to secure legal access. Is there legal access to the Property? __ YES __ NO 14. Other Property Assessments Has the Property or any portion of it been the subject of a minerals assessment, environ- mental assessment, and/or baseline documentation report? __ YES __ NO If yes, please list and indicate the dates of each: _________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 8 15. Mineral Rights Mark all that apply: ___ Mineral rights are owned in full by the Landowner(s) ___ Mineral rights have been partially severed from the surface estate ___ Mineral rights have been severed entirely from the surface estate ___ Some or all the mineral rights owned by the Landowner(s) are leased to another en- tity Explain the basis for this answer(s) and list any documentation that may be available re- garding mineral rights: ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ If mineral rights exist on the Property, are they to be encumbered or conveyed as part of this Proposal? __ YES __ NO 16. Mining/Drilling Activity Are there any mining/drilling activities currently on the Property or activities that cur- rently access minerals of the Property? __ YES __ NO If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Are there any surface use leases or mining/drilling agreements currently on the Prop- erty? __ YES __ NO If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Are there any mining/drilling leases or activities anticipated on the Property or that are anticipated to access minerals of the Property? __ YES __ NO If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 9 17. Alternative Energy Activity Is there any alternative energy (e.g. wing, solar, hydro, geothermal, etc.) activities cur- rently on the Property? __ YES __ NO If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Are there any alternative energy leases or agreements currently on the Property? __ YES __ NO If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Are there any alternative energy leases, agreements, or activities anticipated on the Prop- erty? __ YES __ NO If yes, please describe: _____________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 18. Water Interests Are there water rights or other water interests associated with this Property? __ YES __ NO If yes, please answer the following: i. Are there surface water rights associated with the Property? Direct Flow Rights __ YES __ NO Storage Rights __ YES __ NO Other Rights __ YES __ NO Name of water right(s): ______________________________________________ Percent ownership of right(s): _________________________________________ Decree case number(s) if known: ______________________________________ Decreed flow rate(s) and/or storage volume: ______________________________ Decreed use of water right(s): _________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 10 Has water been used pursuant to the decreed use for this water right(s) in the past 5 years? __ YES __ NO ii. Are there any mutual ditch or reservoir company shares associated with the Property? __ YES __ NO Name(s) of Mutual Ditch or Reservoir Company: _________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Number of shares: __________________________________________________ Yield of shares (flow rate or storage volume per share): _____________________ __________________________________________________________________ iii. Are there any well associated with the Property? __ YES __ NO Number of wells: ___________________________________________________ Permit number(s): __________________________________________________ If a well is not permitted, please explain why: ____________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Decree case number(s) for any decreed well(s): ___________________________ Permitted or decreed pumping rate(s): ___________________________________ Is the well(s) presently operable? __ YES __ NO Has the well(s) been operated in the past 5 years? __ YES __ NO What is the purpose of this well (domestic, livestock, irrigation, etc.)? _________ __________________________________________________________________ Frequency of use: ___________________________________________________ iv. Is there an augmentation source for any well(s) associated with the property? __ YES __ NO If yes, is this a decreed plan for augmentation? __ YES __ NO Please describe the plan and list relevant decree case number(s) if known: __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 11 v. Is there additional water resource information associated with the Property that would be useful in evaluating this Proposal? __ YES __ NO If yes, describe below and include the additional information as an attachment to this Proposal: ______________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ List all water rights and water interests to be encumbered or conveyed as part of this Pro- posal: __________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 19. Photographs High resolution photographs of the Property are required as attachments to this Proposal in .jpeg or other standard viewable format files. Please limit the number of photographs to no more than 6 high-quality images. A CHLT representative can take these photos if requested. By submitting this Proposal, the landowner agrees to allow CHLT’s discretionary use of the photographs. © Colorado Headwaters Land Trust, 2023 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Colorado Headwaters Land Trust is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization certified by the State of Colorado and nationally accred- ited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission. 12 IV. Signatures By signing or typing your name below, you certify that: 1. the information contained in this Proposal is complete and accurate to the best of your knowledge; 2. you understand that CHLT will work to complete this transaction; and 3. you pledge to work diligently and in good faith to accommodate the timeliness of closing the transaction. All landowners must sign. Please copy additional signature lines, as needed, if there are more property owners than spaces provided: Landowner(s): Name of Landowner: _____________________________________________________ I certify my typed name above constitutes my electronic signature (if applicable): _____ Date: ________________________________ Name of Landowner: _____________________________________________________ I certify my typed name above constitutes my electronic signature (if applicable): _____ Date: ________________________________ Name of Landowner: _____________________________________________________ I certify my typed name above constitutes my electronic signature (if applicable): _____ Date: ________________________________ Corporations, Partnerships, Limited Liability Companies, and Trusts (if applicable): Name of Entity: _________________________________________________________ By (Name and Title): _____________________________________________________ I certify my typed name above constitutes my electronic signature (if applicable): _____ Date: ________________________________ 52 North First Street PO Box 1938 Granby, CO 80446 (970) 887-1177 info@coloradoheadwaterslandtrust.org www.coloradoheadwaterslandtrust.org 312 Park Ave, Box 857, Grand Lake, CO 80447 * 970-509-0199 * geoff@grandenvironmental.com Date: December 12, 2023 To: Town of Fraser Sarah Catanzarite From: Geoffrey EllioƩ RE: Regulatory Brief on Moving Forward with US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) permit miƟgaƟon requirements for 2012 Protected Natural Area (PNA) for Victoria Village Property, Fraser, CO Prepared for Town of Fraser (ToF) to support discussion of PNA amendments for Victoria Village PNA. AƩachment A) Final MiƟgaƟon Plan Design Plan Sheet 1 by Ecological Resource Consultants (ERC 2012), dated 8-12-12, transmiƩed to ToF by property seller early 2022, part of due diligence. 1) General Note #1 idenƟfies this sheet as “Final Compensatory MiƟgaƟon Plan for US Army Corps DA Permit #SPK-2007-01908.” 2) General Note #8 idenƟfies this sheet as part of Final Compensatory MiƟgaƟon Plan (CMP) Report prepared by ERC (2-17-12). 3) CMP guides creaƟon of ~0.24 acre of palustrine scrub-shrub wetland for 1:1 raƟo (wetland replacement vs loss) on site. Hydrology from intercepƟng shallow groundwater. No discussion of work in or around St. Louis Creek (SLC). 4) Shows ~0.24 acre of wetlands to be filled and ~0.24 acre in three basins to be excavated for replacement wetlands. 5) USACE Ben Wilson told us this was a NaƟonwide Permit (NWP) but not which one (there are currently >50 NWPs). AƩachment B) Selected pages from NaƟonwide Permit 29 (NWP29) for ResidenƟal Developments, Dated 15Mar21, expires 14Mar26, downloaded from US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Albuquerque District www.spa.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory- Program-and-Permits/NWP/ 1) NWP29 is consistent with what we know about 2007-2012 USACE permiƫng for Victoria Village leading to ERC 2012 Compensatory MiƟgaƟon Plan: a. MulƟ-unit residenƟal or residenƟal subdivision. b. Wetland loss no greater than ½ acre. Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 12, 2023 * Page 2 c. PreconstrucƟon NoƟficaƟon (PCN) required for all NWP29 authorizaƟons (formal permit process but not more onerous “Individual Permit.” 2) General CondiƟons (GC) Common to All NWPs GC #23 MiƟgaƟon – required to ensure individual and cumulaƟve impacts are no more than minimal. GC #23(e) Compensatory MiƟgaƟon Plans (CMPs) for “NWP acƟviƟes in or near streams or other open waters will normally include a requirement for…legal protecƟon (e.g., conservaƟon easements) for riparian areas next to open waters.” a. Normally 25 to 50Ō wide on each side of stream. GC #23 (f)(1) ProspecƟve permiƩee responsible for proposing appropriate compensatory miƟgaƟon opƟon. Recognize permiƩee-responsible miƟgaƟon as pracƟcable if project is not within service area for a wetland miƟgaƟon bank or in-lieu-fee system . See 33 CFR part 332 GC #23 (f)(6) Compensatory miƟgaƟon requirements (e.g., resource type and amount to be provided as compensatory miƟgaƟon, site protecƟon, ecological performance standards, monitoring requirements) may be addressed through condiƟons added to the NWP authorizaƟon instead of components of a compensatory miƟgaƟon plan. GC #23 (h) For permiƩee-responsible miƟgaƟon, the special condiƟons must clearly indicate the party or parƟes responsible for the implementaƟon and performance of the compensatory miƟgaƟon project, and, if required, its long- term management. AƩachment C) Selected Sheets from 33 CFR Part 332—Compensatory MiƟgaƟon for Losses of AquaƟc Resources, original date 10Apr2008. 1) USACE Ben Wilson referred us to these “2008 miƟgaƟon guidelines” we should follow to make sure we conƟnue PNA condiƟons and protecƟons as commiƩed in 2012. 2) SecƟon 332.4 Planning and DocumentaƟon, SubsecƟon (c ) MiƟgaƟon plan number (3) through (14) outline miƟgaƟon requirements. (4) Site protecƟon instrument – descripƟon of the legal arrangements and real-estate instrument, including site ownership, that will be used to ensure the long-term protecƟon of the compensatory miƟgaƟon site. (8) Maintenance plan – a descripƟon and schedule of maintenance requirements to ensure the conƟnued viability of miƟgaƟon resources. Grand Environmental for Town of Fraser * 970-509-0199 * December 12, 2023 * Page 3 (9) Ecological performance standards -- ecologically based standards that will be used to determine whether the compensatory miƟgaƟon project achieves its objecƟves. (10) Monitoring requirements – parameters to be monitored to determine if the project is meeƟng its objecƟves are being met or if “adapƟve management” is needed. (11) Long-term management plan – how will site be managed aŌer miƟgaƟon objecƟves have been met to achieve long-term sustainability including financing mechanisms and the party responsible for long-term management, monitoring, and reporƟng. (12) AdapƟve management plan – management strategy to address unforeseen changes in site condiƟons, including the party or parƟes responsible for implemenƟng adapƟve management measures. (13) Financial assurances – a descripƟon of financial assurances that will be provided to assure a high level of confidence that the project will be completed as commi Ʃed. 1. THIS PLAN IS A FINAL COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN FOR US ARMY CORPS DA PERMIT# SPK-2007-01908. THIS PLAN IS SUBJECT TO ALL SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 2. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED AS A DESIGN -BUILD IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT BY ERC. INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION MAY EXIST FOR IMPLEMENTATION BY OTHERS. ERC DESIGNER WILL OVERSEE ALL WORK ON A REGULAR BASIS. 3. ERC LEAD DESIGNER CONTACT: DAVID BLAUCH (303) 6794820. OWNER CONTACT: Condominios y Desarrollos Terra -Nova (JAMISON MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES (303) 550-1230. 4. JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND EXIST IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING THE MITIGATION SITES. ERC SHALL CLEARLY FIELD STAKE EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY PRIOR TO ANY SITE ACTIVITY. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLLED ON THE UPLAND SIDE OF THE WETLAND BOUNDARY, ALL SITE WORKERS SHALL BE INFORMED AS TO THE BOUNDARY AND SENSITIVE NATURE OF THE AREA. NO DISTURBANCE SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE EXISTING WETLAND THAT HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED. 5. EROSION CONTROL BARRIER (SEDIMENT LOGS OR SILT FENCE) SHALL REMAIN PROPERLY INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE DISTURBANCE AREA (AS DEPICTED ON THE PLAN) UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING AND PLANTING ACTIVITIES UNTIL VEGETATION HAS ESTABLISHED AS DETERMINED ADEQUATE BY ERC. 6. THIS PLAN INTENDS TO DEVELOP A SEMI -PERMANENTLY SATURATED/INUNDATED PALUSTRINE SCRUB -SHRUB WETLAND COMMUNITY TOTALING A MINIMUM OF 0.236 -AC. PRIMARY HYDROLOGY WELL BE ACHIEVED THROUGH INTERCEPTING THE SHALLOW GROUNDWATER. 7. MITIGATION SITES SHALL BE FIELD IDENTIFIED AND VERIFIED BY ERC BASED ON EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS. 8. THIS PLAN IS PART OF THE FINAL COMPANSATORY MITIGATION PLAN REPORT PREPARED BY ERC (2.17.12). 9. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND ELEVATIONS MAY BE DIFFERENT THAN THAT DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN. ALL ELEVATIONS WILL BE FIELD STAKED AND VERIFIED BY ERC. PROPOSED GRADING IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS. 10. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS CROSSING WETLANDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO ENSURE MINIMAL DISTURBANCE AND • , COMPACTION TO THE WETLNAD. WETLAND CROSSINGS SHALL FIRST HAVE GEO-TEXTILE PLACED ON THE GROUND SURFACE COVERED WITH A MINUMUM OF 0.25 -FOOT OF STRAW OR WOOD CHIPS AS NEEDED. CLEAN GRAVEL OR FILL MATERIAL SHALL THEN BE PLACED ON TOP. OTHER METHODS MAY BE RECOMMEND BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH PRIOR APPROVAL BY ERC. ALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS CROSSINGS SHALL BE COMPLETELY RECLAIMED. 1. CREATION OF THE WETLAND MITIGATION AREA REQUIRES SALVAGE, TRANSPORTATION AND PLACEMENT OF WETLAND TOPSOIL FROM THE DA PERMIT AUTHORIZED IMPACT AREAS A AND B AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 2. ERC DESIGNER SHALL CLEARLY DELINEATE THE WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED AND TOPSOIL SALVAGED PRIOR TO ANY SITE ACTIVITY. ONLY THE WETLAND TOPSOIL SHALL BE SALVAGED AND NOT MIXED WITH OTHER UPLAND TOPSOIL. APPROXIMATELY 0.20 -ACRES OF WETLAND AREA WILL BE USED FOR TOPSOIL SALVAGE. 3. THE UPPER 1.0 -FOOT OF ROOTMAT AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE STRIPPED AND TRANSPORTED TO THE MITIGATION SITE. TOPSOIL MATERIAL WILL BECOME INTERMIXED INCLUDING ABOVE GROUND PLANT PARTS, ROOTMAT, ORGANIC MATTER AND MINERAL SOIL AS PART OF SALVAGE, , TRANSPORT AND PLACEMENT. APPROXIMATELY 380 CUBIC YARDS WILL NEED TO BE SALVAGED AND TRANSPORTED. ADDITIONAL WETLAND TOPSOIL SHALL BE SALVAGED, STOCKPILED AND USED AS NEEDED IN THE SITE TO ACCOUNT FOR SETTLING AND/OR VARIATIONS. 4, WETLAND TOPSOIL SALVAGE WILL NEED TO BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT, OVER LOT GRADING AND MITIGATION CONSTRUCTION. IF STOCKPILING OF MATERIAL IS REQUIRED, COORDINATION WITH ERC WILL BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY OF SEEDBANK, 5. WETLAND TOPSOIL SALVAGE CONTAINS WILLOW ROOTWADS. WILLOW ROOTWADS SHALL BE SALVAGED IN THIS AREA ALONG WITH TOPSOIL. ALL WILLOWS BRANCHES SHALL FIRST BE TRIMMED SO THAT NO MORE THAN 1.0 -FOOT OF STEM REMAINS ABOVE GROUND. 1. WETLAND SEEDING SHALL OCCUR UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES AND FINAL PLACEMENT OF SALVAGED WETLAND TOPSOIL. WETLAND SEEDING SHOULD BE COMPLETED DURING "DRY" SOIL CONDITIONS IF POSSIBLE. 2. WETLAND SEED MIX SHALL BE BROADCAST ACROSS ALL DESIGNATED AREAS PER PLAN AND AS FIELD IDENTIFIED BY ERC. SEED SHALL BE SPREAD IN TWO -OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS ACROSS THE SITE. SEED SHALL BE MIXED WITH 50% VOLUME OF CLEAN SAND TO ENSURE EVEN DISTRIBUTION. 3. A ONE-TIME APPLICATION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE SPREAD ACROSS THE ENTIRE WETLAND DURING SEEDING. THE USE OF SOIL AMENDMENT IN WETLAND AREA WILL BE BASED UPON SALVAGED TOPSOIL CONDITION AT TIME SALVAGE/PLACEMENT AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS. OSMOCOTE 12-5-9 OR OTHER EQUIVELANT PRODUCT SHALL BE SPREAD AT 300 POUNDS PER ACRE ACROSS THE ENTIRE WETLAND. MYCORRIZAL INOCULUM (DRY-GRANULAR-ENDONET) MYCOAPPLY OR OTHER EQUIVELANT PRODUCT SHALL BE SE SPREAD AT A RATE OF 60 POUNDS PER ACRE ACROSS THE ENTIRE WETLAND DURING SEEDING OPERATIONS. ALL SOIL AMMENDMENTS TO BE APPROVED BY ERC AS NEEDED. 4. SEED AND SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE LIGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE SOIL SURFACE BY LIGHT COMPACTION WITH A HAND ROLLER OR SIMILAR METHOD TO ENSURE GOOD SOIL -SEED CONTACT. CHAIN DRAG, DISC OR DRILL MAY BE USED HOWEVER, SITE CONDITIONS MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR SUCH METHODS. SEED -SOIL INCORPORATION METHOD TO BE APPROVED BY ERC. 1. UPLAND DISTURBANCE SEEDING SHALL OCCUR UPON COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES AND AFTER WETLAND SEEDING AS APPROVED BY ERC. 2. UPLAND DISTURBANCE SEEDING AREAS SHALL BE FINISHED TO HAVE AN ADEQUATE SEEDBED. UPLAND SEEDBEDS SHALL BE SMOOTH, FREE OF CLODS AND ROCKS (IN EXCESS OF 0.25 -FOOT IN DIAMETER) OR RUTS AND HAVE A 0.5 -FOOT MINIMUM UPPER LAYER OF LOOSE TOPSOIL. SEEDBED SHALL BE WELL SETTLED, FIRM AND FRIABLE TO FACILITATE SEED PLACEMENT AT REQUIRED DEPTHS. COMPACTED SOILS SHALL BE RELIEVED BY SUBSOILING, RIPPRING OR DEEP CHISELING. HARROWING, DISCING OR OTHER OPERATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO BREAKDOWN LARGE SOIL CLODS GREATER THAN 0.25 -FOOT IN DIAMETER AND PROVIDE AN ACCEPTABLE SEEDBED. 3. UPLAND SEED MIX SHALL BE BROADCAST SPREAD ACROSS ALL DESIGNATED AREAS PER THE PLAN AND AS DIRECTED BY ERC. UPLAND AREA AND TRANSITION BUFFER SEED SHALL BE MIXED WITH 50% VOLUME OF CLEAN SAND TO ENSURE EVEN DISTRIBUTION. SEED SHALL BE SPREAD IN TWO-OPOSITE DIRECTIONS ACROSS THE SITE. 4. A ONE-TIME APPLICATION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE SPREAD ACROSS THE ENTIRE UPLAND DISTURBANE AREA DURING SEEDING AS DETERMINED APPROPRIATE BY ERC. THE USE OF SOIL AMENDMENT IN WETLAND AREA WILL BE BASED UPON SALVAGED TOPSOIL CONDITION AT TIME SALVAGE/PLACEMENT AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS. BIOSOL MIX 7.2.3 OR OTHER EQUIVELANT PRODUCT SHALL BE SPREAD AT 600 POUNDS PER ACRE ACROSS THE ENTIRE UPLAND. MYCORRIZAL INOCULUM (DRY-GRANULAR-ENDONET) MYCOAPPLY OR OTHER EQUIVELANT PRODUCT SHALL BE SE SPREAD AT A RATE OF 60 POUNDS PER ACRE ACROSS THE ENTIRE UPLAND DURING SEEDING OPERATIONS. 5. SEED AND SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE LIGHLTY INCOPORATED INTO THE SOIL THROUGH HAND RAKING, CHAIN DRAG OR SIMILAR METHOD TO ENSURE GOOD SOIL -SEED CONTACT. 6. ALL UPLAND DISTURBANCE AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH HYDRO -MULCH OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET WITHIN 48 -HOURS OF SEEDING. FINAL APPLICATION METHOD TO BE DETERMINED BY ERC. EROSION CONTROL FABRIC SHALL CONSIST OF A SHORT-TERM (12 -MONTH) SINGLE NET BIODEGRADABLE NATURAL FIBER FABRIC. NORTH AMERICAN GREEN BIONET S75BN OR OTHER EQUIVELANT PRODUCT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. NO POLYPROPYLENE NETTING STRUCTURE SHALL BE USED. ALL FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS. THE USE OF WOOD FIBER HYRDO-MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 2000 POUNDS PER ACRE.. Al HYDRO-N'AULCH SHALL ALSO INCLUDE A MULCH TACKIFIER CONSISTING OF ORGANIC, NON-TOXIC, FREE -FLOWING, NON -CORROSIVE MATERIAL. HYDRO -MULCH SHALL UNIFORMLY COVER ALL SEEDED AREAS WITH A UNIFORM LAYER. COMPENSATORY MITIGATION AREAS 0.24 AC (-1:1 REPLACEMENT) EROSION CONTROL BARRIER (2,200') NOTES: 1. REQUIRED PLS (PURE LIVE SEED) BASED ON 0.25 -AC SEEDING WETLAND IMPACT AREA A & 8 (0.236 AC) SALVAGE TOPSOIL (-380 CYDs) AND BACKFILL WITH SPOILS AC = Acres CYDs = Cubic Yards Sq. Ft. = Square Feet LF= Linear Feet PSS = Palustrine Scrub -Shrub Wetland KSI rp y:r.4 TABLE 1. WETLAND SEED MIX PALUSTRINE SCRUB -SHRUB WETLAND AREAS SCIENTIFIC NAME BECKMANNIA SYZIGAHNE CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS CAREX NEBRASCENSIS DESCHAMPSIA CEASPITOSA PHLENM ALPINUM COMMON NAME SLOUGHGRASS BJ REEDGRASS NEBRASKA SEDGE TUFTED HAIRGRASS ALPINE TIMOTHY TABLE 2. UPLAND SEED MIX (ALL UPLAND DISTURBANCE AREAS) SCIENTIFIC NAME BROMUS MARGINATUS ELYMUS CANADENSIS FESTUCA SAXIMONTANA PASCOPYRUM SMITH!' COMMON NAME MOUNTAIN BROME CANADA WILDRYE ROCKY MTN. FESCUE WESTERN WHEATGRASS �F MIX PLS REQUIRED 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.5 TOTAL 2.0 AREA AND 100 SEEDS PER SQUARE FOOT BROADCAST. PLS REQUIRED 13.0 2.0 0.2 8.0 TOTAL 23.5 NOTES: 1. REQUIRED PLS (PURE LIVE SEED) BASED ON 0.5 -AC SEEDING AREA AND 100 SEEDS PER SQUARE FOOT BROADCAST. RG 8. WETLAND INDICATOR STATUS OBLIGATE OBLIGATE OBLIGATE FACULTATIVE FACULTATIVE Agar• ._..._ � "tunessartastirnarpnanggengtl tory d Creation (P , 00 Sq. Ft. ,8545 cil - 1.....,-, / dr 41 ,� lt/H///n"/////ta/eo /50 :: r., „ 4 .-- ametare f X39 5 ���,�r�//trey- ///.r/ yIr=--_:_ _...mss/�i��.-. ,,fr!✓ �/ /CONSTRUCTION EQUI /INSTALL TRACKING P PARK STREET ka 5ANI RY Compensatory Mitigation Area 2 (MA2) Wetland Creation (PSS)- 0.14 AC; (6,400 Sq. Ft. -Max Area) N Compensatory Mitig-pion/ Area 1 (MA1) Wetland Creatio Pe 0AA AC (1,825 Sq. Ft.- !ax. a� 1 /SSiNit192Y SE mpact Areas A & B - 0.236 AC (10,305 Sq. Ft.) resulting from proposed over lot grading. Salvage wetland topsoil and rootmat (0.5') and transport to MA1, MA2 and MA3. ack fill Impact Areas with spoils from Al. MA2 and MA3. KL Cv 54 i5 ELEV.b59). G2 Revision No.: cc N 6 N tn 0 Z US Army Corps of Engineers. Albuquerque District To F V V /9/1/W-- 2021 Nationwide Permit Summary P-eG -z3 NATIONWIDE PERMIT 29 Residential Developments Effective Date: March 15, 2021 Expiration Date: March 14, 2026 (NWP Final Notice, 86 FR 2744) Residential Developments. Discharges of dredged or fill material into non -tidal waters of the United States for the construction or expansion of a single residence, a multiple unit residential development, or a residential subdivision. This NWP authorizes the construction of building foundations and building pads and attendant features that are necessary for the use of the residence or residential development. Attendant features may include but are not limited to roads, parking lots, garages, yards, utility lines, storm water management facilities, septic fields, and recreation facilities such as playgrounds, playing fields, and golf courses (provided the golf course is an integral part of the residential development). The discharge must not cause the loss of greater than 1/2 -acre of non -tidal waters of the United States. This NWP does not authorize discharges of dredged or fill material into non -tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters. Subdivisions: For residential subdivisions, the aggregate total loss of waters of United States authorized by this NWP cannot exceed 1/2 -acre. This includes any loss of waters of the United States associated with development of individual subdivision lots. Notification: The permittee must submit a pre -construction notification to the district engineer prior to commencing the activity. (See general condition 32.) (Authorities: Sections 10 and 404) Nationwide Permit General Conditions Note: To qualify for NWP authorization, the prospective permittee must comply with the following general conditions, as applicable, in addition to any regional or case -specific conditions imposed by the division engineer or district engineer. Prospective permittees should contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine if regional conditions have been imposed on an NWP. Prospective permittees should also contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine the status of Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification and/or Coastal Zone Management Act consistency for an NWP. Every person who may wish to obtain permit authorization under one or more NWPs, or who is currently relying on an existing or prior permit authorization under one or more NWPs, has been and is on notice that all of the provisions of 33 CFR 330.1 through 330.6 apply to every NWP authorization. Note especially 33 CFR 330.5 relating to the modification, suspension, or revocation of any NWP authorization. Page 1 of 24 required to determine if the items or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 22. Designated Critical Resource Waters Critical resource waters include, NOAA-managed marine sanctuaries and marine monuments, and National Estuarine Research Reserves. The district engineer may designate, after notice and opportunity for public comment, additional waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance, such as outstanding national resource waters or state natural heritage sites. The district engineer may also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for public comment. (a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States are not authorized by NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52, 57 and 58 for any activity within, or directly affecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. (b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 54, notification is required in accordance with general condition 32, for any activity proposed by permittees in the designated critical resource waters including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The district engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only after she or he determines that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal. 23. Mitigation The district engineer will consider the following factors when determining appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal: (a) The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site). (b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, or compensating for resource losses) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal. (c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one -for -one ratio will be required for all wetland losses that exceed 1/10 -acre and require pre -construction notification, unless the district engineer determines in writing that either some other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate, or the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal and provides an activity -specific waiver of this requirement. For wetland losses of 1/10 - acre or less that require pre -construction notification, the district engineer may determine on a case -by -case basis that compensatory mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results in only minimal adverse environmental effects. (d) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one -for -one ratio will be required for all losses of stream bed that exceed 3/100 -acre and require pre -construction notification, unless the district engineer determines in writing that either some other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate, or the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal and provides an activity -specific waiver of this requirement. This Page 8 of 24 compensatory mitigation requirement may be satisfied through the restoration or enhancement of riparian areas next to streams in accordance with paragraph (e) of this general condition. For losses of stream bed of 3/100 -acre or less that require pre -construction notification, the district engineer may determine on a case -by -case basis that compensatory mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results in only minimal adverse environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation for losses of streams should be provided, if practicable, through stream rehabilitation, enhancement, or preservation, since streams are difficult -to -replace resources (see 33 CFR 332.3(e)(3)). 60144 f) (e) Compensatory mitigation plans for NWP activities in or near streams or other open waters will normally include a reauirement for the restoration or enhancement, maintenance, and legal protection (e.2., conservation easements) of riparian areas next to open waters. In some cases, the restoration or maintenance/protection of riparian areas may be the only compensatory mitigation required. If restoring riparian areas involves planting vegetation, only native species should be planted. The width of the required riparian area will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normally, the riparian area will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream, but the district engineer may require slightly wider riparian areas to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. If it is not possible to restore or maintain/protect a riparian area on both sides of a stream, or if the waterbody is a lake or coastal waters, then restoring or maintaining/protecting a riparian area along a single bank or shoreline may be sufficient. Where both wetlands and open waters exist on the project site, the district engineer will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation (e.g., riparian areas and/or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where riparian areas are determined to be the most appropriate form of minimization or compensatory mitigation, the district engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland losses. (f) Compensatory mitigation projects provided to offset losses of aquatic resources must comply with the applicable provisions of 33 CFR part 332. (1) The prospective permittee is responsible for proposing an appropriate compensatory mitigation option if compensatory mitigation is necessary to ensure that the activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. For the NWPs, the preferred mechanism for providing compensatory mitigation is mitigation bank credits or in -lieu fee program credits (see 33 CFR 332.3(b)(2) and al). However, if an appropriate number and type of mitigation bank or in -lieu credits are not available at the time the PCN is submitted to the district engineer, the district engineer may approve the use of permittee-responsible mitigation. (2) The amount of compensatory mitigation required by the district engineer must be sufficient to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects (see 33 CFR 330.1(e)(3)). (See also 33 CFR 332.3(f).) (3) Since the likelihood of success is greater and the impacts to potentially valuable uplands are reduced, aquatic resource restoration should be the first compensatory mitigation option considered for permittee-responsible mitigation. (4) If permittee-responsible mitigation is the proposed option, the prospective permittee is responsible for submitting a mitigation plan. A conceptual or detailed mitigation plan may be Page 9 01.24 t e r r a c i n a d e s i g n Landscape Architecture – Planning -Civil Engineering 10200 E. Girard Avenue, A-314. Denver, CO 80231 ph: 303.632.8867 1 November 15, 2023 Board of Trustees Town of Fraser 153 Fraser Ave Fraser, CO 80442 Re: The Meadows at Grand Park Filing No. 3 Dear Board of Trustees, On behalf of Grand Park Development, LLC., I am submitting a request to extend to approval of the Final Plat for The Meadows at Grand Park. The Plat was approved by the Board of Trustees on February 6, 2019, Resolution 2019-02-02. The Plat was approved in three phases. Filings 1 and 2 have been recorded and are either complete and occupied or under construction. Due to slowing demand in real estate caused by higher interest rates, Grand Park Development will not be constructing the third phase of The Meadows by February 2024. It is for that reason that we request a 5-year extension of the approval of The Meadows at Grand Park Filing No. 3 Final Plat. This will give us ample time to navigate the market conditions and complete construction of this neighborhood. We appreciate your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, Terracina Design Layla Rosales, PLA TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2019-02-02 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND FINAL PLAN THE MEADOWS AT GRAND PARK At a special meeting of the Fraser Planning Commission held on August 29th, 2018, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC., requested a recommendation of approval for a Final Plat and a Final Plan for The Meadows at Grand Park; and WHEREAS, Cornerstone Winter Park Holdings, LLC., is the current owner of the property; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting Final Plat and Final Plan approval which would create 21 single family detached lots and 44 multi-family/townhome lots on 12 acres of land; and WHEREAS, Staff has determined that this application is in compliance with the subdivision and zoning regulations of the Town of Fraser: and WHEREAS, the Fraser Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution 2018-08-02, recommending approval of the Final Plat and Final Plan of The Meadows at Grand Park with conditions. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1. The documents suggest the housing product type is single family attached; however, 4-unit buildings do not fit the definition of single family attached per code (maximum 2 units-duplex). Such buildings are defined as "row house" AKA townhome" in the definition section. Revise all documents accordingly and provide the necessary townhome declarations, HOA documentation and/or party wall agreement. 2. Street name of Hay Meadow is acceptable; however, it is listed as a Drive and also a Road, and also no name at all. Staff encourages the applicant to choose a different name for the street accessing onto US40 to avoid confusion to First Responders in the future. Staff to review different name to ensure no duplication with existing street names in Grand County. 3. MPEI is requiring the following language to be added to the final plat: All multi- family buildings within this subdivision shall have electric meters on one unit gang metering) and have a perpetual non-exclusive utility easement for the purpose of constructing and operating the electric supply for distribution. 4. Phasing plan is unclear on Final Plat. Clarify and ensure it matches Final Plan. 5. Address all engineering comments from Tim Gagnon in the Bowman Consulting Memo dated August 16, 2018. 6. List Parcel A as future development on all sheets of Final Plan and Final Plat. Alternately, incorporate into a note on sheet 1 of both Final Plan and Final Plat. 7. Clarify ownership of Tract C Final Plan General Note #7 suggests that open space will be owned and maintained by Grand Park HOA, and Final Plat General Note #16 suggests that open space will be owned by Grand Park Development, LLC. 8. Utility easements adjacent to the ROW on the south side of Hay Meadow Drive adjacent to the single family detached lots should be labeled as "snow storage and utility easements." 9. Land use/area table should show summary of all land uses. Correct the density numbers under the land use table/summary. Building summary chart should be deleted. Information is inaccurate in the building totals and entitlements for this Planning Area 3WC. 10.Provide all final plat documents necessary for each final plat recordation, including, but not limited to deed and title insurance for open space conveyances to HOA and Grand Park Development LLC., complete Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with Engineers Cost Estimate for each phase, and provide 911 address mylar and digital files of plat. 11.Final documents to be reviewed and approved by Town Engineer and Town Attorney. 12.5 units will be transferred from Planning Area 5W to Planning Area 3WC per the density transfer mechanism. 13.Pay all applicable fees. If such conditions are not satisfied, the approval provided by this resolution is no longer valid. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6th DAY OF February, 2019. Votes in favor: 5 BOARD OF TF USTEES OF THE Votes opposed: 0 T FR SER, C LO1AD Abstained: O Absent: 2 BY: C/ Mayor o N OF F s P ATTEST: S E A LSEAL OR ,5 Town Clerk Town of Fraser Ordinance NO. 506 Series 2024 AN ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE 4 TO CHAPTER 10 OF THE FRASER TOWN CODE TO PROVIDE FOR ERADICATION OF GRAFFITI VANDALISM. WHEREAS, the Town of Fraser would like to eradicate graffiti vandalism within the Town. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THAT: PART 1: AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. Chapter 10 Article 4 of the Fraser Town Municipal Code (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") are hereby amended as follows [Note: additions are shown in bold underlined print; deletions are shown as strikethrough print]: Chapter 10 Article 4. Eradication of Graffiti Vandalism Sec. 10-4-10. Legislative intent. The Fraser Board of Trustees finds and declares that graffiti vandalism constitutes a serious and growing menace, injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the residents of the Town. Graffiti vandalism creates visual blight and devalues public and private property. Furthermore, graffiti vandalism contributes substantially to the spread of violence and crime. Prompt eradication of graffiti vandalism is necessary to control the spread of graffiti vandalism and promote the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the residents of the Town. Sec. 10-4-20 Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Agent means an individual or entity that is authorized by a business or property owner to act on his behalf with regard to the business or property. Deface means to mar the external appearance or injure, impair or destroy by effacing significant details of something by removing, distorting, adding to or covering all or a part thereof. Graffiti vandalism means any unauthorized defacement of public or private property, including, but not limited to, buildings, structures, fixtures, sidewalks or other improvements, whether permanent or temporary, with any inscription, word, figure, sign, symbol, marking or design, by means of painting, marking, drawing, writing, etching or carving, by use of paint, spray paint, ink, knife or any similar method, and which is visible from the public right-of-way or an adjacent property. Owner or property owner means any person holding legal title to any property, real or personal, located within the Town boundaries. Property means any structure, building, premises, business, vacant lot, single- family dwelling, multifamily dwelling or any other real or personal property located within the Town. Tenant means any person leasing, renting, using or in any other way occupying the property of another for any term with his assent, express or implied. Sec. 10-4-30. Declaration of public nuisance. All property defaced by graffiti vandalism is declared to be a public nuisance and is a Code violation subject to all available remedies allowed by law and pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 7 of this Code. Sec. 10-4-40. Concurrent remedies. The procedures set forth in this article for defaced property shall not be exclusive and shall not restrict the Town from concurrently enforcing other Town ordinances or pursuing any other remedy provided by law. Sec. 10-4-50. Duty of property owners, agents and tenants. It is the duty of every person, whether owner, agent or tenant of any property, at all times to maintain the property in a clean and orderly condition, including the immediate removal or abatement of graffiti vandalism from the property. Sec. 10-4-60. Abatement by the Town. Any property owner, agent, or tenant whose property has been defaced by graffiti vandalism may voluntarily agree to immediate removal or eradication of the graffiti vandalism by the Town, which removal shall be without charge to the property owner, agent or tenant, if the property owner, agent or tenant contacts the Town within 72 hours after the graffiti vandalism occurs, or after verbal or written notice is provided by the Town that graffiti vandalism has been found on the property. (1)If the property owner, agent or tenant agrees to such abatement by the Town, those persons designated by the Town to execute abatement are expressly authorized to enter upon the owner's property for the purpose of causing the removal or eradication of graffiti vandalism. (2)Such agreement by the owner authorizes the Town to abate or remove the graffiti vandalism by any available and appropriate means. This includes the use of chemicals to remove the vandalism or the use of paint to cover the vandalism. The Town does not guarantee any color matching if paint is determined to be the most appropriate abatement procedure. Sec. 10-4-70. Notice of violation. The Health Officer or designee may issue a “notice of violation” to any property owner, agent, or tenant of any property who fails to remove or abate graffiti vandalism from the property either by their own action or as described in Section 10-4-60 of this Code. Such notice of violation shall be issued in accordance with Section 7-1-20 and Section 7-1-30, respectively, of this Code. Sec. 10-4-80. - Violations and penalties. Any owner, occupant or agent in charge of a lot, building, fence, structure, premise or place, who fails or refuses to abate the nuisance within twenty-four (24) hours after being ordered to do so by the Board of Health, Chief of Police or other officer of the Town, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, in addition to all legal remedies available for the enforcement of this Chapter, such as injunctions and mandatory restraining orders and any other available relief, shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand six hundred fifty dollars ($2,650.00) for each separate offense. Every period of forty-eight (48) hours of continuance of the nuisance shall be a separate offense without need for separate notice for the second and subsequent offenses of the same continuing nuisance. PART 2: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance. PART 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PART 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. PART 5: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published by title only. READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS ____DAY OF _____________, _______. Votes in favor: ____BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ____TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: ____ BY: ____________________________________ Mayor ( S E A L ) ATTEST: ____________________________________ Town Clerk Published in the Middle Park Times on________________________. Town of Fraser Ordinance NO. 507 Series 2024 AN AMENDMENT CHAPTER 7 ARTICLE 2 OF THE FRASER TOWN CODE GRAFFITI VANDALISM NUISANCE WHEREAS, the Town of Fraser would like to define graffiti vandalism as a public nuisance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE FRASER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THAT: PART 1: AMENDMENT OF MUNICIPAL CODE. Section 7-2-10 of the Fraser Town Municipal Code (herein sometimes referred to as the "Municipal Code") are hereby amended as follows [Note: additions are shown in bold underlined print; deletions are shown as strikethrough print]: Sec. 7-2-10. Nuisance defined. (a)It shall be unlawful to place, discard or abandon any of the following where such is visible from a public right- of-way, public property, or other place of public access. Any such item is hereby declared to be a public nuisance and any person causing or permitting any such nuisance shall be in violation of this Article. (1)Storage of construction or building materials unless such materials are neatly stacked and organized. (2)Abandoned, discarded or unused objects, or objects that are no longer being used for their intended purpose such as indoor furniture, mattresses, bedframes, dressers, electronics, appliances, machinery, scrap metal, auto or mechanical parts, or any other such item. (3)Any accumulation of rubbish or household garbage. (4)Tires except seasonal tires that are neatly stacked or stored against part of a fixed building structure such as a house, garage, or shed. (5)Automobiles, vehicles, trailers, recreational vehicles in a state of disassembly, disrepair, or in the process of being stripped or dismantled unless such is enclosed within a garage. Only one (1) unlicensed or unregistered vehicle is permitted per property. (6)Any shelter or covering made of plastic, cloth, or similar material with tears or holes larger than twenty-four (24) inches. (b)Any activity or condition which has been declared to be a public nuisance by state courts or statutes or known as such at common law shall constitute a public nuisance in the Town, and any person causing or permitting any such public nuisance shall be in violation of this Article. (c)Graffiti vandalism is a public nuisance as declared in Section 30, Article 4, Chapter 10 of this Code. PART 2: REPEAL. Any and all existing ordinances or parts of ordinances of the Town of Fraser covering the same matters as embraced in this Ordinance are hereby repealed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed; provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or prevent the prosecution or punishment of any person for any act done or committed in violation of any ordinance hereby repealed prior to the taking effect of this Ordinance. PART 3: SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Town of Fraser hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PART 4: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage, adoption and publication thereof as provided by law. PART 5: PUBLICATION. This Ordinance shall be published by title only. READ, PASSED, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SIGNED THIS ____DAY OF _____________, _______. Votes in favor: ____BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ____TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Votes abstained: ____ BY: ____________________________________ Mayor ( S E A L ) ATTEST: ____________________________________ Town Clerk Published in the Middle Park Times on________________________. TOWN OF FRASER RESOLUTION NO. 2024-01-06 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGNATION OF THE MAYOR AND FILLING THE VACANCY WHEREAS,Mayor Philip Vandernail submitted a letter of resignation on December 21, 2023 declaring his intent to vacate the office of Mayor on January 3, 2024. WHEREAS,C.R.S.§31-4-103(1)Within thirty days of the mayor’s death,disability, resignation,or other vacation of the mayor’s office,the city council shall appoint a person possessed of all statutory qualifications or order a special election as soon as practicable to fill the vacancy until the term of office of a successor elected at the next regular election has commenced.(2) The city council may appoint one of their own number acting mayor or mayor pro tem who is entitled to act as mayor in case the mayor is absent from the city or is for any reason temporarily unable to perform the duties of his office. WHEREAS,C.R.S.§31-4-303(1)The Board of Trustees has the power,by appointment, to fill all vacancies in the board or any other office,and the person so appointed shall hold his office until the next regular election and until his successor is elected. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO THAT: 1.The Board of Trustees accepts the resignation of Philip Vandernail effective January 3, 2024. 2.An acting Mayor will be appointed within thirty days of the resignation to fill the vacancy until the regular municipal election on April 2, 2024. 3.The Board will accept letters of interest for the interim Acting Mayor from current Trustees and qualified registered electors in the Town of Fraser.Letters must be electronically submitted to the Fraser Town Clerk by Monday January 15,2024 at 5:00 p.m. DULY MOVED, SECONDED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2024. Votes in favor: ___BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Votes opposed: ___TOWN OF FRASER, COLORADO Abstained: ___ BY: Mayor ATTEST: (S E A L) Town Clerk MEMO TO:Mayor Vandernail and the Board of Trustees FROM:Antoinette McVeigh, Town Clerk DATE:January 3, 2024 SUBJECT:Mayor Resignation MATTER BEFORE BOARD: Mayor Vandernail submitted a resignation on ________________. Below is a timeline and explanation regarding appointing a mayor to fill the vacancy until the next election. BACKGROUND: C.R.S. 31-4-103. Mayor - vacancy - appointment - mayor pro tem. (1) Within thirty days of the mayor’s death, disability, resignation, or other vacation of the mayor’s office, the city council shall appoint a person possessed of all statutory qualifications or order a special election as soon as practicable to fill the vacancy until the term of office of a successor elected at the next regular election has commenced, as provided in section 31-4-105, and the city council may appoint a registered elector to act as mayor until the special election. The special election shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the “Colorado Municipal Election Code of 1965”. If the council lacks a sufficient number of members in office to establish a quorum to choose a successor or order an election, the vacancy shall be filled in the manner provided by section 31-4-108 (3). (2) The city council may appoint one of their own number acting mayor or mayor pro tem who is entitled to act as mayor in case the mayor is absent from the city or is for any reason temporarily unable to perform the duties of his office. 31-10-108. Special elections. Special elections shall be held on any Tuesday designated by ordinance or resolution of the governing body. No special election shall be held within the ninety days preceding a regular election. No special election shall be called within sixty days before the date thereof, nor shall any special election be held within the thirty-two days before or after the date of a primary, general, or congressional vacancy election. A special election may be held at the same time and place as a primary, congressional vacancy, or general election as a coordinated election pursuant to section 1-7-116, C.R.S., or may be conducted at the same time as a mail ballot election pursuant to article 7.5 of title 1, C.R.S. Special elections shall be conducted as nearly as practicable in the same manner as regular elections. A special election could only be held between December 11, 2023 and January 2, 2024. Process: 1.Accept the resignation of the Mayor. A resolution would be created declaring the vacancy, its effective date, and how the board intends to fill the appointment. The Board has 30 days to fill the vacancy since a special election cannot be called. 2.The appointment can be filled by a current Trustee or by a qualified elector. The Board will have to consider if they will accept letters of interest from Trustees, qualified electors or both. Alternatively, the Board could vote on an interested Trustee without requesting letters or opening the process to the public. a.Items to consider when making the appointment: • Making an appointment that benefits or appears to benefit any member of the governing body personally; • Appointing someone who will create turmoil or dysfunction within the governing body or other areas of municipal government; or • Failing to provide the appointee with proper training once appointed. Like any other person serving in an elective position, an appointee should receive proper training. 3.If the Board does not have a majority vote for one person to be appointed as the acting Mayor, the Mayor Pro-Tem would perform all the Mayor’s duties until the next election when the Mayor is elected. 4.If a Trustee is appointed to perform the Mayor duties the Trustees does not resign. The Board would have only six Trustees until the next election. 5.The appointment will fulfil the term for the current Mayor which expires at the April 2, 2024 election. RECOMMENDATION: The Board shall decide who (trustee(s) and/or qualified elector(s)) to consider for the appointment and when the vote for the appointment shall take place. From:Philip Vandernail To:Eileen Waldow; Kaydee Fisher; Lewis Gregory; Katie Soles; Brian Cerkvenik; Parnell Quinn; Michael Brack; Antoinette McVeigh Subject:resignation Date:Thursday, December 21, 2023 12:34:32 PM Dear Board of Trustees, I am writing to formally submit my resignation as the Mayor of Fraser, effective January 3, 2024. My family has decided to move out of the State of Colorado, and I will no longer be eligible to serve as the Mayor of Fraser once we have moved. Serving as the Mayor of Fraser has been an incredible honor, and I am grateful for the opportunity to have worked with the dedicated members of the town board, town staff, and the Fraser community. Together, we have faced challenges, celebrated successes, and worked towards making Fraser an even better place to live, work, and play. I want to express my appreciation for the support and collaboration I have received during my time in office. The commitment and passion of the residents of Fraser have been instrumental in the progress we have made, and I am confident that the town will continue to thrive under new leadership. I am grateful for the memories and experiences I have gained during my tenure as Mayor, and I look forward to seeing the continued growth and success of Fraser in the future. Thank you again for the opportunity to serve the wonderful community of Fraser. Sincerely, Philip Vandernail Mayor Town of Fraser 75487 U.S. Highway 40, P.O. Box 89 Fraser. CO. 80442 www.frasercolorado.com Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from your system.