Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout01.17.2017 City Council Meeting PacketMEDINA AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 17, 2017 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 Meeting Rules of Conduct: • Fill out and turn in white comment card • Give name and address • Indicate if representing a group • Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of the January 3, 2017 Regular Council Meeting V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Appoint Elizabeth Weir to the Medina Park Commission B. Approve Amended and Restated Grounds Services Agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club C. Resolution Accepting Resignation of Amanda Staple VI. PRESENTATIONS A. Senator David Osmek VII. COMMENTS A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda B. Park Commission C. Planning Commission VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Woodridge Church Expansion — 1500 County Road 24 B. Ellis and Nancy Olkon — Preliminary Plat- 2362 Willow Drive C. Ordinance Amending Section 525 of the Medina City Code Regarding City Park Commission IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XII. ADJOURN Posted 1/12/2017 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Medina City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: January 12, 2017 DATE OF MEETING: January 17, 2017 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Appoint Elizabeth Weir to the Medina Park Commission — The second open seat on the Park Commission did not get filled at the January 3rd meeting due to lack of applicants. Elizabeth Weir has expressed interest in serving on the Medina Park Commission for a one year term to fill the vacant seat. Staff recommends approval of her appointment. No attachments for this item. B. Approve Amended and Restated Grounds Services Agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club — Staff met with the new board members for the Hamel Athletic Club on December 5th and has been working through some punch list items to prepare for the spring baseball season. Minimal changes were made to the amended agreement to allow the Hamel Athletic Club to reserve the baseball fields for their youth program in 2017. Staff recommends approval. See attached agreement. C. Resolution Accepting Resignation of Amanda Staple — Amanda Staple resigned from her temporary, part-time position in the Planning Department. Staff recommends approval. See attached resolution. VI. PRESENTATIONS A. Senator David Osmek — Senator David Osmek will be at the meeting to give the City Council an update on the legislative session. No attachments for this item. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Woodridge Church Expansion — 1500 County Road 24 — Woodridge Church has made applications to expand their church building to primarily add additional classroom space. The applicant is seeking to add a 15,000 square foot addition on to the existing church building. The expansion requires review of a Site Plan Review and an amended Conditional Use Permit. Associated with this request is a lot combination and an interim use permit to allow for the single family house on the property to remain. As part of the lot combination, a portion of the property is proposed to be rezoned and reguided to be one consistent designation. See attached report. Potential Motion: Direct staff to prepare documents granting approval for the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, lot combination, conditional use permit, site plan review, and interim use permit, related to the expansion of the Woodridge Church based upon the findings described in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. B. Ellis and Nancy Olkon - Preliminary Plat — 2362 Willow Drive — Ellis and Nancy Olkon have requested a subdivision of their approximately 21 acre parcel into two parcels. The applicant also previously applied for a lot size variance because the proposed lots do not include the minimum 5-acres of contiguous suitable soils required in the Rural Residential zoning district. The City reviewed and denied the variance request. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed plat at the January 10, 2017 meeting and unanimously recommended denial of the preliminary plat based upon the findings described in the staff report. See attached report. Potential Motion: Move to direct staff to prepare resolution to deny the proposed preliminary plat by Ellis and Nancy Olkon at 2362 Willow Drive based upon the findings described in the staff report. C. Ordinance Amending Section 525 of the Medina City Code Regarding City Park Commission — Staff received an application for the Park Commission from a student under the age of 18, but the current ordinance does not address youth members. Staff has researched the issue and found that some other metro communities allow for up to two youth members on various volunteer commissions. City Council Liaison to the Park Commission Lorie Cousineau, Park Commission Chair Steve Lee and Staff Liaison to Parks Jodi Gallup are recommending the attached ordinance amendment to allow for non- voting youth members to the Medina Park Commission. See attached memo and ordinance. Recommended Motion: Adopt ordinance amending Section 525 of the Medina City Code regarding city park commission. 2 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 003977E-003995 for $66,511.72, order check numbers 045369-045442 for $287,027.88, and payroll EFT 507653-507683 for $50, 738.01. INFORMATION PACKET • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update • Public Works Department Update • Claims List 3 DRAFT 2 3 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 3, 2017 4 5 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on January 3, 2017 at 6 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. 7 8 I. ROLL CALL 9 10 Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. 11 12 Members absent: None. 13 14 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer 15 Jim Stremel, City Planner Dusty Finke, and Chief of Police Ed Belland. 16 17 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & CEREMONIAL MATTERS (7:00 p.m.) 18 19 A. Oath of Office for Mayor Bob Mitchell 20 Johnson administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Mitchell. 21 22 B. Oath of Office for Councilmember John Anderson 23 Johnson administered the Oath of Office to Councilmember Anderson. 24 25 C. Oath of Office for Councilmember Jeff Pederson 26 Johnson administered the Oath of Office to Councilmember Pederson. 27 28 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:03 p.m.) 29 Mitchell asked to add an item to the agenda so that Anderson could discuss an issue 30 with deer crossings. He also requested to add an item to the agenda regarding the 31 worksession discussion two weeks prior regarding conservation development. 32 33 Moved by Martin, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the agenda as amended. 34 Motion passed unanimously. 35 36 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:04 p.m.) 37 38 A. Approval of the December 20, 2016 Special City Council Meeting Minutes 39 Johnson noted that the draft minutes did not include Batty and noted that he would 40 update the list of those present to include him. 41 42 It was noted on page one, section 2, the second to last line, it should state, "...do..." 43 44 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the December 20, 2016 special 45 City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 46 47 B. Approval of the December 20, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 48 It was noted on page three, lines 13, 18, 21, it should state, "...the bond counsel..." On 49 page three, line 18, it should state, "...in place,..." On page three, line 21, it should 50 state, "...bond counsel and,..." On page three, line 22, it should state, "...change 51 language,..." On page three, line 41, it should state, "...park Park..." On page three, Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 January 3, 2017 1 line 48, it should state, "...and unanimously recommended unanimous approval..." On 2 page three, line 51, it should state, "...their its..." On page four, line three, it should 3 state, "...their its..." On page four, line eight, it should state, "...the settlement..." On 4 page four, line nine, it should state, "...stated that...." On page four, line 21, it should 5 state, "...but mostly with in a residential developments..." On four, line 23, it should 6 state, "...that...." On page four, line 24, it should state, "...tool, the City has they have..." 7 On page five, line 41, it should state, "...setup set up..." On page six, line one, it should 8 state, "...their its..." 9 10 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the December 20, 2016 11 regular City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 12 13 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:08 p.m.) 14 15 A. Resolution No. 2017-01 Approving Residential Recycling Grant Agreement 16 with Hennepin County 17 B. Resolution No. 2017-02 Accepting Donation from Hamel Volunteer Fire 18 Department Relief Association 19 C. Approve Final Payment to Municipal Builders for Wellhouse No. 3 Addition 20 D. Approve Final Change Order for Medina City Hall Lower Level 21 Improvements Project 22 Moved by Pederson, seconded by Anderson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 23 passed unanimously. 24 25 VI. COMMENTS (7:09 p.m.) 26 27 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 28 There were none. 29 30 B. Park Commission 31 Johnson stated that the Park Commission did not meet in December. He noted that 32 there is one vacant position on the Commission and welcomed interested residents to 33 apply. He noted that the Park Commission is also looking for a youth member and is 34 researching the age range for the position. It was noted that the youth member would 35 not have a vote but would be able to provide a unique perspective. 36 37 C. Planning Commission 38 Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to hold three 39 public hearings. He noted that the first request is related to a Concept Plan under the 40 conservation design subdivision. He noted that the second request is for a 41 Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning request for Woodridge Church, which is 42 part of the approvals needed for the requested expansion. He noted that the third item 43 would be a Preliminary Plat for the Olkons, noting that the variance request was 44 considered previously but action would still be needed on the Preliminary Plat. 45 46 VII. NEW BUSINESS 47 48 A. Resolution No. 2017-03 Establishing 2017 Appointments and Designations 49 to Various City Services, Authorities, Commissions, and Agencies (7:11 50 p.m.) Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 January 3, 2017 1 Mitchell stated that he appreciates everyone for their contributions on the list of 2 appointments. He suggested that the list not be changed for Council appointments and 3 would like to leave the list as is for this year with changes to be made in 2018. 4 5 Moved by Martin, seconded by Pederson, to Adopt Resolution No. 2017-03 Establishing 6 2017 Appointments and Designations to Various City Services, Authorities, 7 Commissions, and Agencies. Motion passed unanimously. 8 9 B. 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan Update (7:13 p.m.) 10 Johnson thanked the Steering Committee for the excellent work and the time they have 11 spent to get the City to this point. He also commended staff, specifically Finke for the 12 exceptional work that he has done. 13 14 Finke stated that the Comprehensive Plan sets the vision and goals of the City and helps 15 to guide infrastructure and investments. He noted that the Comprehensive Plan has a 16 submittal deadline of December 2018 and advised that the City is far ahead of schedule. 17 He stated that the City will most likely be the first community to submit their plan. He 18 acknowledged that the Council did want the City to be in this position because of the 19 decreases that were made to the Metropolitan Council system statements. He thanked 20 the Steering Committee, staff, and residents for their involvement and contribution to the 21 process. He noted that there are certain items that the City is required to be consistent 22 with by law, such as the Metropolitan Council system statements. He noted the 23 substantial reduction in residential development from the previous draft of the 24 Comprehensive Plan, to better match the reduction that was made in the system 25 statements from the Metropolitan Council. He noted that the vision statement and 26 community goals had already been reviewed with the City Council as those guide the 27 various chapters in the plan. He stated that another major component of the plan was 28 the future land use section, as that helps to guide other aspects of the plan. He noted 29 that a draft of the future land use plan was shared with the residents last spring and 30 acknowledged the major changes including the reduction in residential development and 31 shifts to the staging plan. He highlighted aspects of the future land use plan and staging 32 plan. He provided an additional map which identifies the changes to future land use 33 under the draft Comprehensive Plan. 34 35 Anderson asked why the additional map would not be included. 36 37 Finke stated that the map could certainly be included. He stated that the Metropolitan 38 Council does not provide requirements for commercial/business development and 39 therefore that discretion is left up to the City. He stated that the Steering Committee did 40 not feel it necessary to stage the commercial/business development to the extent the 41 residential is staged. He noted that the market will ultimately drive that development. 42 He stated that the Park Commission took the lead on the parks and trails plan, which 43 follows the work of the Parks and Trails Master Plan. He noted that there is a need for 44 three future parks in the City to serve the objectives of the Master Plan. 45 46 Mitchell acknowledged the barrier that Highway 55 is for residents to cross, specifically 47 children, when trying to reach parks. 48 49 Finke stated that during the open house meetings, one of the major consistent items was 50 the need for a safe pedestrian crossing on Highway 55. He stated that the 51 implementation chapter outlines a process for the City to follow in the nine months Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 January 3, 2017 1 following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan to ensure the framework and policies 2 of the City are updated to meet the new Comprehensive Plan. He noted that the capital 3 improvement chapter addresses the needs to meet the objectives outlined in the 4 Comprehensive Plan. He stated that if there is relative comfort from the Council on the 5 future land use map, engineering staff will then start the modeling process for the sewer 6 and water section of the plan. He identified infrastructure needs for sewer and water 7 which would be needed to support the proposed residential development, including an 8 additional lift station, a 1,000,000-gallon water tower, and expansion to the water 9 treatment plant. He stated that once directed by the Council, the City is required to send 10 the plan for review by affected jurisdictions which include neighboring cities, watersheds, 11 and other State agencies. He noted that a six-month comment period is required. He 12 noted that an informal review from the Metropolitan Council is also included in the six- 13 month comment period. He noted that once the City receives comments, they would 14 decide whether to incorporate those comments prior to the final submission to the 15 Metropolitan Council. 16 17 Pederson referenced the water tower and asked for additional details on whether 18 participating communities would be asked to share the cost. 19 20 Finke stated that the water tower would most likely occur outside the timeframe for this 21 Comprehensive Plan and therefore a decision would not be made at this time but agreed 22 that the issue could be investigated as to whether that could be shared. 23 24 Pederson stated that he has additional questions but believed he should recuse himself 25 to ask them. 26 27 Pederson recused himself. 28 29 Jeff Pederson stated that his family has a property on Mohawk Drive and the guiding 30 was low density near the memory care facility under the current Comprehensive Plan. 31 He noted that he was out of town for the November Steering Committee Meeting and 32 Planning Commission Meeting on December 13th when a decision was made to change 33 the guiding of his family's property to rural residential rather than low density. He noted 34 that the property faces a parking structure. 35 36 Martin stated that she will also recuse herself from the discussion because of a potential 37 conflict of interest on this topic. 38 39 Mitchell stated that there was movement throughout October through December 40 regarding the changes in low density and rural residential, which happened to coincide 41 with Pederson being out of town. He believed that the Council should send this back to 42 the Planning Commission and Steering Committee to ensure that the right decisions 43 were made. 44 45 Finke stated that the Planning Commission has held a public hearing and recommended 46 approval as is. He stated that the change to the future land use map was done at the 47 November 14th Steering Committee meeting and that topic was an explicit discussion. 48 49 Kathy Martin, Chair of the Steering Committee, stated that the area in discussion has 50 been contentious. She believed that the decision was deliberate and the property was 51 laid out as is, primarily to surround the Wealshire property in residential development. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 January 3, 2017 1 2 Anderson stated that there was also discussion on a possible lift station that would be 3 needed for properties to the north and that is why low density was not recommended for 4 that area. 5 6 Mitchell stated that the Council does not have to act tonight as the item will come back to 7 the Council. He asked that the staff review the Pederson property to determine if an 8 additional review is needed to make the best decision. He noted that the Council does 9 not even need to act on January 17th and therefore if an additional two weeks is needed 10 at that time, the City would still have that time. 11 12 Jeff Pederson thanked the Council for listening as his family has owned the property 13 since 1965. 14 15 Mitchell confirmed the consensus of the Council to have staff review the Pederson 16 property. 17 18 Anderson asked that the matter be handled by staff as the Steering Committee has 19 already been adjourned and he would want to avoid having to reconvene the Committee. 20 21 Johnson stated that would place staff in a difficult position as this would be a policy 22 decision for the Council. 23 24 Mitchell stated that staff could review the decisions that were made to support the 25 changes and review that with Pederson. 26 27 Cousineau stated that perhaps it would be best for the three members of the Council 28 having this discussion to have the minutes from the discussions when the changes were 29 made. 30 31 Johnson confirmed that staff will provide the minutes from those meetings and can 32 summarize the changes that were made. 33 34 Anderson agreed that this would be a Council decision and the three members of the 35 Council having this discussion should be prepared to make a decision. 36 37 Pederson and Martin rejoined the Council. 38 39 Mitchell referenced the bus service in Maple Plain and the connection to affordable 40 housing. 41 42 Bob Franklin, 2819 Lakeshore Avenue, stated that he is a member of the Steering 43 Committee. He explained that bus service to Maple Plain is a recent development and 44 because of that access to bus service, the Committee felt the property identified for 45 affordable housing would be best suited in that location to provide a connection not only 46 to the bus service but also for those that work in the nearby commercial portion of Maple 47 Plain. He thanked the other members of the Committee, staff, and Finke for their work 48 on the draft Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the Committee has stated that the 49 confines of the infrastructure constrain the City, specifically regarding transportation. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 January 3, 2017 1 Cousineau referenced the issue of affordable housing, specifically the additional 2 information that was proposed to be included, noting that it was not included in the 3 previous plan. 4 5 Martin stated that the language was also included in the previous version of the plan. 6 She noted that the City actually does very little to support affordable housing, although 7 some on the Committee would advocate for affordable housing. 8 9 Cousineau referenced language that says "Medina will provide for affordable housing" 10 and asked whether that should state Medina will guide rather than provide. 11 12 Finke confirmed that the language could be changed. He noted that a checklist is 13 provided from the Metropolitan Council to meet the requirements and also includes what 14 could be done in addition to the minimum requirements. He noted that the language 15 regarding affordable housing is a minimum requirement of the Metropolitan Council. He 16 noted that if the Council has additional comments or input they could provide those 17 comments to him. 18 19 C. Issue with Deer Crossing (7:58 p.m.) 20 Anderson stated that he has discussed the issue with Johnson. He noted that the 21 previous week heading east on County Road 24 a small herd of deer crossed CR 24 in 22 front of him to access the park. He noted that he proceeded to watch the deer bang 23 themselves into the fence. He asked staff if there is something they can do to contact 24 the park to find out the purpose of the fence. He noted that it is a potential hazard to 25 have dazed deer coming back onto the roadway after hitting the fence. 26 27 D. Worksession Discussion Regarding Conservation Development (8:00 p.m.) 28 Mitchell stated that conservation development was discussed at the worksession two 29 weeks ago. He stated that he would like staff to determine why the ordinance reads as it 30 does. He noted that he would favor a lower requirement for conservation development. 31 He asked whether the Council would support lowering the requirements. 32 33 Pederson stated that he felt that the Council asked staff to do something the Council 34 would need to decide to do, specifically regarding whether that percentage should be 35 lowered. 36 37 Mitchell stated that the guideline was developed for some reason and he would simply 38 like staff to provide a summary of why that is set at that limit. 39 40 Martin stated that she would not support changing the density bonus as that allows for 41 protection of resources. She thought that the direction was that the Council directed 42 staff to make the eligibility requirements for the density bonus more clear. 43 44 Mitchell explained that is why he brought the topic up tonight to determine the clarity. 45 46 Martin stated that the decision was made at the last worksession and now the item has 47 been added to this agenda without proper notification. She stated that now Mitchell is 48 unilaterally asking to move the item back for discussion because he did not agree with 49 the decision. 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 January 3, 2017 1 Pederson stated that he would also support lowering the density bonus and having staff 2 provide a summary of why the bonus was set at that amount to begin with. 3 4 Finke stated that when the ordinance was developed staff worked with consultants to 5 make the best determination. He noted that the density bonus was discussed at length 6 throughout the process of creating the ordinance to create a balance between allowing 7 flexibility to incentivize and placing a limitation on the development. He noted that the 8 density bonus was thought about more than anything when creating the ordinance. He 9 believed that the ordinance was established in 2009. 10 11 Johnson stated that the takeaway by staff following the worksession was to review the 12 criteria. He noted that the sample size is small as there have only been three requests 13 since the ordinance was enacted. 14 15 Cousineau stated that she agrees that the density bonus of 200 percent is high, but 16 noted that perhaps the criteria could be strengthened as the conservation that would be 17 required for the 200 percent. 18 19 Bob Franklin stated that for a developer coming in the ceiling becomes the floor, as they 20 will automatically go for the high end. He noted that the comments received by the 21 Steering Committee time after time was that residents want to keep Medina rural. 22 23 Anderson stated that he agreed that whatever number is set as the high limit is what 24 developers will request. He stated that the number itself is somewhat arbitrary and the 25 real basis is that the Council needs to make the decision on what they want. 26 27 Martin noted that a density bonus is not even allowed for discussion until a significant 28 amount of buildable land is set aside for conservation. 29 30 Cousineau asked if conventional development would protect the land. 31 32 Martin stated that from an open space aspect conventional development does not 33 protect that land. 34 35 Finke stated that a minimum amount of 30 percent of buildable land must be set aside 36 for conservation before a density bonus can be considered. 37 38 Martin stated that the City has a very creative conservation design ordinance that follows 39 everything in the Comprehensive Plan. 40 41 Mitchell stated that typically the lot sizes are larger and provide open space in 42 themselves and half as many houses because of the restraints of the land itself. He 43 acknowledged that the land is not public open space. He asked if staff can provide a 44 summary and place the item on the agenda for the 17tn 45 46 Batty stated that there is a very small sample size in the city. He noted that the one 47 dominant example the City has, was a very contentious one. He hoped that would not 48 unduly influence the Council's examination of the ordinance moving forward. 49 50 Johnson asked Finke what would be a reasonable amount of time for staff to compile the 51 requested information. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 January 3, 2017 1 2 Finke stated that it is his understanding that what is requested is a summary of the 3 discussion surrounding the maximum density. He noted that he could have that 4 prepared for the next meeting but noted that he would not be able to review the criteria 5 and the Council would not be able change the ordinance as a public hearing would be 6 required. 7 8 VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:16 p.m.) 9 Johnson reported that on January 25th from 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. there will be a meeting at 10 City Hall to discuss traffic issues on County Roads 19,116, and 101 with Hennepin 11 County and MnDOT. 12 13 IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:17 p.m.) 14 Mitchell stated that there was a report via email from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed 15 which will be sent to the members of the Council. He noted that the details are not very 16 specific. He stated that in November and December the final numbers were provided for 17 the 2017 Fire Department budgets. He noted that an updated chart would be sent out to 18 the Council. He stated that he would like to get Dominium and their development as 19 involved as possible with City events. He wanted to ensure that the residents of the 20 development receive the City newsletter and publications even though they are renters. 21 22 Martin referenced the concept plan public hearing which is scheduled for January 10th 23 under the current Comprehensive Plan and asked how that would occur. 24 25 Finke stated that the existing regulations are in place until the new Comprehensive Plan 26 is adopted. 27 28 X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:21 p.m.) 29 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Cousineau, to approve the bills, EFT 003958E- 30 003976E for $50,369.81, order check numbers 045312-045368 for $182,310.03, and 31 payroll EFT 507627-507652 for $47,399.77. Motion passed unanimously. 32 33 Xl. ADJOURN 34 Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:21 p.m. 35 Motion passed unanimously. 36 37 38 39 Bob Mitchell, Mayor 40 Attest: 41 42 43 Scott Johnson, City Administrator Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 January 3, 2017 Agenda Item # 5B AMENDED AND RESTATED GROUNDS SERVICES AGREEMENT This Amended and Restated Grounds Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made this day of , 2017, by and between the Hamel Athletic Club, P.O. Box 62, Hamel, MN 55340, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (the "Contractor") and the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"). Recitals 1. The City has been authorized to enter into a contract for grounds services; and 2. The City has approved the contract for grounds services with the Contractor; and 3. The parties wish to redefine the scope of services and terms of their agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Contractor agree as follows: Terms 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Contractor will perform "grounds services" for the City on all fields except Medina Morningside Park fields in Area F on the attached Exhibit A. "Grounds services" will consist of: ➢ Picking up paper, trash, and debris following ball field use. This shall include keeping all dugouts clean and sweeping daily. Individual parties renting the fields will be responsible for cleaning up their own trash and debris, however, the Contractor will be responsible should the renters fail to perform their duties. ➢ Grooming and dragging reserved ball fields that schedule maintenance services though the City prior to the renter's scheduled practices, games, and tournaments. ➢ Chalking reserved ball fields that schedule maintenance services through the City prior to the renter's scheduled games and tournaments. ➢ Preparing fields after rain to get them in playing condition to include getting rid of standing water and use of diamond dry when needed. ➢ Mowing and bagging the infield two to three times per week on Paul Fortin Memorial Field, Lighted Little League Field, and Quad # 3 Field. Field conditions and the level of use on the fields that week will determine if a third mowing is necessary. ➢ Maintaining the lips of all fields and re -edging each field every year as determined by the City. ➢ Maintaining pitcher's mound and home plate daily for all fields. ➢ Working with the City on rolling the fields once during the contract term, at a time and date designated by the City. In consideration for providing the grounds services, the Contractor shall have the first option for dates reserved prior to March 31st for games and practices taking place between April 1 and July 31, 2017 to schedule and conduct youth baseball and softball practices and games on the Hamel Legion Park excluding Area D and Hunter Lions Park ball fields as defined in Exhibit A (the "Subject Property"). 1 Contractor will also erect temporary back stops for younger youth leagues in the open field areas of Hamel Legion Park as defined in Exhibit A. Contractor will remove backstops by July 31, 2017. Contractor shall be allowed to conduct youth softball/baseball tournaments and unlimited development clinics on the Hamel Legion Park and Hunter Lions ball fields during the duration of this Agreement. Contractor will conduct its team formation tryouts on a Saturday in April. The Contractor will also use this day to do field preparation. All Contractor schedules of activities shall be coordinated and approved by the City's Staff Liaison. When possible, the Contractor will receive notification 30 days in advance of any events scheduled for the fields, so conflicts can be avoided. The Contractor will provide the City Staff Liaison with an email contact list, to help facilitate this communication. 2.0. TERM. The term of this contract will be from April 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017. 2.01 RIGHT OF FIRST OFFER. Prior to marketing the Subject Property, including Area D (the Paul Fortin Memorial Field), to others at the end of the Term of this Agreement, the City shall give notice to the Contractor that the Subject Property will be made available to others and the terms (including the same number of fields, days and hours identified in Section 3.02 and Section 3.03 of this Agreement) to be contained in any such offer. The Contractor will have the right to accept the terms of any such offer referred to in the preceding sentence by giving the City notice of its election within 30 days of receipt of the terms of the City's proposed offer. 3.0 COMPENSATION. 3.01 The Contractor shall provide the City with a $1,000.00 deposit by April 1, 2017 as a deposit for use of the City ball fields and facilities. The City shall retain a portion or all of the deposit for actual costs incurred to repair damages to facilities as a result of the Contractor's use or for costs incurred by the City to perform services which Contractor failed to perform under this Agreement. The City shall return any remaining balance of the deposit to the Contractor within 30 days following termination of the Agreement. If additional expenses are incurred by the City in repairs and in the performance of services otherwise obligated to be performed by the Contractor under this Agreement in an amount in excess of the deposit, the City will submit a bill for the difference between the actual cost and the deposit to the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to pay such balance within 30 days of receipt. 3.02 The Contractor shall pay the City in the amount of $2,500.00 for use of the Hamel Legion Park recreational fields Area A, Area B, and Area C per the attached Exhibit A from Monday through Friday, 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. in Area A and Area B from April 1st through July 31st and Area C from April 15th through July 31, 2017. The Contractor will also receive priority for use of the batting cages from Monday through Thursday, 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. from April 15th to July 15th. The Contractor may also use the Hamel Legion 2 Park recreational fields on weekends for training events at no additional cost with the condition that priority would be given to a scheduled group that has paid for a weekend field reservation. Payment shall be submitted by Contractor to the City by June 1, 2017. 3.03 The Contractor shall notify the City by March 31 st if the Contractor intends to use the Hamel Legion Park recreational field Area D per the attached Exhibit A. If the Contractor intends to use Area D, the Contractor shall pay the City in the amount of $450 for use of Area D from Monday through Friday, 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. from April 1st through July 31 st with the understanding that the Contractor will work around Heritage Christian Academy's spring schedule and work with the Hamel Hawks to allow for up to four evening weekday home games per season. 3.04 The Contractor shall pay the City in the amount of $250.00 for use of the Hunter Lions Park ball field Area E per the attached Exhibit A from Monday through Fridays, 4:00 p.m. to dusk, from April 1 through July 31, 2017. Payment shall be submitted to the City by June 1, 2017. 3.05 The Contractor shall pay the City in the amount of $250.00 for use of the Medina Morningside Park ball fields Area F per the attached Exhibit A from Monday through Thursdays, 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., from April 15 through July 11, 2017 if this field is needed. Payment shall be submitted to the City by June 1, 2017. 3.06 The Contractor shall pay the City $60.00 per field each day for use of the Hamel Legion Park and/or Hunter Lions Park ball fields for youth softball/baseball tournaments. Payments shall be submitted to the City within 15 business days of the tournament completion. 3.07 The Contractor shall pay the City a $4.00 per participant surcharge fee by June 1, 2017 for use of the bathrooms, building utilities, and general facilities to help pay for utilities and building maintenance. The Contractor shall provide the City a roster of participants in their program by May 1, 2017. 3.08 The Contractor shall pay the City $150 each time the Contractor requests that the City conduct a second weekly mowing of the open fields in Area C per the attached Exhibit A. 3.09 If the Contractor fails to pay the City for any of the fees, bills, deposits, expenses, repairs or damages listed in this Agreement by its due date, a 10% late fee will be applied per month of non-payment. 3.10 The Contractor shall have access to store equipment and tools in the field house garage located in Hamel Legion Park and the storage shed located in Hunter Lions Park. i) The Contractor shall submit all construction plans to the City and receive approval from the Public Works Director prior to making any changes to the storage area, shelves, or other items in the field house or field house garage at Hamel Legion Park. 3 3.11 The Contractor shall have access to the Hamel Community Building Assembly Hall for the purpose of youth ball team organizing meetings. The Contractor shall be limited to conducting five organizing meetings for the duration of this Agreement. The Contractor shall schedule these meetings in advance through the City's rental agent to avoid scheduling conflicts. 3.12 The City will grant the Contractor a temporary sign permit on the premises at Hamel Legion and Hunter Lions Parks at no cost to the Contractor for event and registration signage in compliance with City sign regulations. 3.13 The City shall supply Ag Lime for the inner fields and for the outer tracks around the fields in an amount to be mutually agreed upon by both parties. 3.14 The City shall provide reasonable repair to ball fields upon receiving sufficient notice from Contractor of repair requests and upon sufficient City equipment, materials and labor being available. These repairs are not the grounds services provided by the Contractor, but damages to the ball fields which the Public Works Director defines as arising outside of the responsibilities of the Contractor as defined in this Agreement. 3.15 The City shall provide cleaning services of the Field House bathroom facilities once a week between the dates of April 25 and July 31. 3.16 The City shall provide a garbage enclosure and garbage and recycling containers at the ball fields and shall coordinate collection at the garbage enclosure once a week between the dates of April 25 and July 31. 3.17 The City shall provide grass mowing of the ball fields excluding the infields twice a week from April 25 to July 31 and once a week from August 1-22, or as needed in the area listed as Exhibit A, and weed control of the ball fields as needed. To help league play, Contractor requests that the mowing be performed on Mondays and Thursdays (weather permitting), so that grass length does not hamper play. 3.18 The City will pay the Contractor for reserved field use by renters who schedule maintenance services that are not affiliated with the Contractor $25 per scheduled practice and $50 per scheduled game to conduct "ground services" as defined in 1.0 Scope of Services of this Agreement. If the Contractor fails to conduct the "ground services" for a scheduled use by a renter not affiliated with the Contractor, the Contractor shall pay the City $50 per scheduled practice and $100 per scheduled game for non-performance, which the parties agree is a reasonable estimate of the City's damages for the Contractor's non- performance. 3.19 The City will pay the Contractor $25 per hour for services authorized by the Public Works Director to be completed by the Contractor that are outside of the scope of "scheduled maintenance services" in section 3.18 and "grounds services" in section 1.0 of this agreement. 4 4.0 SIGN ADVERTISEMENT PROGRAM. The Contractor shall be allowed to sell sign advertisements to area businesses to be placed on the ball field fences in Hamel Legion Park per the following conditions: 4.01 All proceeds from the program must be used for capital improvements within Hamel Legion Park such as ball field lights, irrigation system, dugouts, scoreboards, pitching mounds, etc. 4.02 The Contractor must maintain records of revenues and expenses from sign program and provide records to the City. 4.03 Sign dimensions and materials must be uniform and be approved by the City Staff Liaison. 4.04 Signs may be placed on the outfield fences facing home plate or on the ball field fences facing the walkway toward the field house as long as the signs do not restrict anyone's view of the fields. No signs may be placed facing Brockton Lane. 4.05 Signs will be purchased, installed and maintained by the Contractor. It will be the sole responsibility of the contractor to repair and replace damaged signs and any damage such signs may cause to the fence on the fields of the park. 4.05 Signs will only be allowed to be displayed in the park during the regular season from April 1st to July 31st. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to remove signs by July 31, 2017. 5.0 SALE OF FOOD AND BEVERAGES. The sale of food and beverages during Contractor use of premises is prohibited unless separate agreement or license is granted by the City. 6.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 6.01 Both the Contractor and the City acknowledge and agree that the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Any employee or subcontractor who may perform services for the Contractor in connection with this Agreement is also not an employee of the City. The Contractor understands that the City will not provide any benefits of any type in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to health or medical insurance, worker's compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, nor will the City withhold any state or federal taxes, including income or payroll taxes, which may be payable by the Contractor. 6.02 The Contractor will supply and use its own equipment and tools to complete the services under this Agreement. 6.03 The Contractor acknowledges that any general instruction it receives from the City has no effect on its status as an independent contractor. 7.0 INSURANCE. The Contractor will maintain adequate insurance to protect itself and the City from claims and liability for injury or damage to persons or property for all work performed by the Contractor and its employees, agents and subcontractors under this Agreement. The Contractor 5 shall name the City as an additional insured under its general liability policy which shall remain in force during the term of this Agreement, and shall maintain limits of liability under such policy of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate, issued by an insurance company rated no less than A- by AM Best Company. Prior to performing any services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall provide evidence to the City that acceptable insurance coverage is effective. 8.0 WORKER'S COMPENSATION. 8.01 The Contractor will comply, and will ensure that each of its subcontractors comply, with the provisions of the Minnesota worker's compensation statute as an independent contractor before commencing work under this Agreement. 8.02 The Contractor and any subcontractors will provide their own worker's compensation insurance and will provide evidence to the City of such coverage before commencing work under this Agreement. 9.0 INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor will hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including defense, settlement, and reasonable attorney's fees) for claims as a result of bodily injury, loss of life, property damages and any other damages arising out of the Contractor's performance or failure to perform under this Agreement. 10.0 PRIVATIZATION CLAUSE. Contractor agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the "Act") and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained or disseminated by the Contractor in performing its obligations is subject to the requirements of the Act, and the Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Act as if the Contractor was a government entity. 11.0 APPLICABLE LAW. The execution, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement will, in all respects, be controlled and governed by the laws of Minnesota. 12.0 ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor may not assign this Agreement or procure the services of another individual or entity to provide services under this Agreement without first obtaining the express written consent of the City. The Contractor shall provide the City with copies of all contracts for assigned or subcontracted services. 13.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and no other agreement prior to or contemporaneous with this Agreement shall be effective, except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment to this Agreement is not effective unless it is in writing and executed by both parties. 14.0 NO WAIVER BY CITY. By entering into this Agreement, the City does not waive its entitlement to any immunities under statute or common law. 6 15.0 TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time, for any reason. The Contractor must give no less than a 30 day written notice to the City to terminate this Agreement. The Contractor shall pay the City all sums due and the Contractor shall remain obligated to meet all applicable provisions of this Agreement including 3.08 and an early termination fee of $500.00 to help defray some of the City's costs by assuming the Contractor's responsibilities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. CITY OF MEDINA By Bob Mitchell, Mayor By Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator HAMEL ATHLETIC CLUB (CONTRACTOR) By Mike Mohs, President 7 Exhibit A Hamel Legion Park Recreational Fields Hunter Lions Park Ball Field Medina 14Iorningside Park Ball Fields 8 Agenda Item # 5C Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2017- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION OF AMANDA STAPLE WHEREAS, Amanda Staple is currently employed as a part-time planning office assistant by the city of Medina; and WHEREAS, Amanda Staple submitted a letter of resignation from her position addressed to the city; and WHEREAS, Amanda Staple's resignation from her position shall become effective on January 4, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina that Amanda Staple's letter of resignation is hereby accepted. Dated: January 17, 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2017- January 17, 2017 busty, This letter is to serve as the requested notification for the resignation of my temporary position with the Manning Department, which occurred on Wednesday, January 4, 2017. I enjoyed my time and will miss everyone at City Hall, unfortunately my schedule just does not seem to have enough time to do everything that I would like to do. I want to thank you for the opportunity to work in your department and be a part of the team at City Hall. There is a great crew of people working there and I wish you all the best. Amanda Staple Agenda Item # 8A NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTA S, 'NE. 4150 Olson IVIcH orial Higr VV�,y, ate. 320, ma iden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.957.1100 Website: www.nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Medina Mayor and City Council FROM: Nate Sparks DATE: January 11, 2017 RE: Woodridge Church Applications CITY FILE: LR-16-191 Application Date: November 10, 2016 Review Deadline: March 10, 2017 (extended) BACKGROUND Woodridge Church has made applications to expand their church building to primarily add additional classroom space. The expansion requires review of a Site Plan Review and an amended Conditional Use Permit. Associated with this request is a lot combination and an interim use permit to allow for the single family house on the property to remain. As part of the lot combination, a portion of the property is proposed to be rezoned and reguided to be one consistent designation. Currently, the church has a sanctuary and fourteen classrooms with one of the classrooms sometimes being used as an office. The applicant would like to add classrooms on both levels and include more lobby space, restrooms, and storage. There is no proposed expansion of the sanctuary. There is also no proposed expansion of the parking lot. 2013 VARIANCE In 2013 the applicant received a variance related to future construction on the site. The variance was part of a settlement of a lawsuit by the church against the City and allowed for the church to build up to 85,000 square feet of floor area of structures on the site, while the zoning district only allows for 40,000 square feet. The applicant also received a variance to allow up to 400 parking stalls on the property while the zoning district allows for 300. Also stated in the approving resolution is that any expansion of the church would require the applicant to combine the church and the house lot. PROJECT SITE The church site is located at 1500 County Road 24 and the house owned by the church is located at the parcel immediately to the west at 1542 County Road 24. The property is on the north side of the road, west of Tamarack Drive. The property with the church on it is about 20 acres in size and the property with the house is about 8 acres. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is seeking to add a 15,000 square foot addition on to the existing church building. The existing building is about 28,000 square feet currently. The primary purpose of the expansion is to add additional classrooms for school age attendees. The sanctuary is not proposed for expansion at this time. On the upper level, there are currently six classrooms for preschoolers. One of the classrooms is used as an office at times. The proposed addition would add lobby space, restrooms, storage space, and three classrooms. One of the existing classrooms would be split into two to allow for a hallway. According to the applicant, it is likely that one of the classrooms would be made into permanent office space in the future. For now, the plan would result in eleven classrooms on the upper level. The classrooms range in size from 240 square feet to 756. On the lower level, there are currently five smaller classrooms and one large classroom. The proposal is to expand the larger classroom and then to add one larger classroom each for junior high and senior high students. The room for senior high students is about 1900 square feet in area and will be open above to the upper level. The junior high room will be about 1400 square feet in area. The large grade school room, which is about 3600 square feet, will be expanded to about 5300 square feet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT / REZONING The parcel at 1500 County Road 24 that contains the church is zoned Rural Public Semi -Public (RPS). The parcel with the house at 1542 County Road 24 is zoned Rural Residential. The church is guided Public Semi Public and the house parcel is guided Rural Residential. The applicant is seeking to have the two parcels combined. This would necessitate the parcel with the house to be rezoned to RPS and guided Public Semi Public. Comprehensive Plan Amendment In the Comprehensive Plan, the Public -Semi Public designation is intended for "governmental, religious, educational, and cemetery uses." The property in question is in the Rural Service Area. A goal for the rural areas is to "provide low -intensity land uses, such as rural residential, farming, hobby farms, horticulture, conservation of natural and ecologically significant natural resources and passive recreation." Rezoning The purpose of the Rural Public/Semi-Public (RPS) is for facilities that offer public services such as governmental, religious, recreational, conservation, open space and cemetery uses that is not served by City sewer and water services and is within close proximity to low intensity rural residential uses. As a result, limitations are established on the intensity of uses within the district and development is regulated in a way which limits impacts on the surrounding properties and encourages low impact development to protect and enhance the natural environment. Section 825.35 of the Zoning Ordinance states criteria for granting rezoning requests. It states that the City may adopt amendments to the zoning map but that "such amendments shall not be issued indiscriminately" and "shall only be used as a means to reflect changes in the goals and policies of the community as reflected in the Plan or changes in conditions in the City." The property in question would be meeting the minimum standards of the RPS District. LOT COMBINATION As part of the 2013 variance, it was required that the lots be combined upon any expansion. The applicant is now seeking this approval. The applicant is proposing to combine the lots via a metes and bounds description. Hennepin County is requesting an additional 7 feet of right-of-way for the southeastern portion of the site to ensure there is forty feet of right-of-way on the north side of the centerline of County Road 24 throughout the site. The County also recommends additional right-of-way for future turn lanes. The applicant has requested that this right-of-way not be required unless and until turn lanes are required in the future. 2 INTERIM USE PERMIT The applicant is seeking an interim use permit to allow for the house on the site to remain. In the RPS District it states that the "continuation of a residential use existing on the property prior to the religious institution being established" is permitted provided the "use shall be limited in term and be subject to Interim Use Permit approval." The applicant is proposing to keep the house until the sanctuary and parking lot are expanded. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / SITE PLAN REVIEW The use of the site as a religious institution requires a conditional use permit in the RPS District. Therefore, the expansion will need to meet the requirements of the ordinance for conditional uses, as depicted on the site plan. The RPS District has specific standards for religious institutions, which are listed in the categories below. Minimum Lot Size The site will be about 29 acres after the lot combination. The minimum lot size for a church is 10 acres. The minimum lot width is 500 feet and the parcel is proposed to be over 900 feet. The lot must have frontage, or be in close proximity to, an arterial roadway. County Road 24 has this classification in the City's Transportation Plan. Septic System RPS District standards for churches state that the lot must contain at least 5 acres of suitable soils plus a primary and secondary septic site. The site has more than 5 acres of suitable soils. The site plan depicts the existing septic system for both the church and the house. A secondary site for the church must be included on the plan. This secondary site was approved in the past but is not depicted on the site plan. The applicant is modifying the current septic system to update it and to relocate some facilities. The City's Building Official has reviewed the proposed modifications and has found it to be acceptable. Site Conditions The ordinance prohibits exterior bells or loudspeakers. Play areas are required to be setback 100 feet from any property lines. There is a pre-existing play area that is about 35 feet from the property to the east. This is not being modified and is largely screened by natural vegetation. Direct views of the parking lot from off -site are prohibited. The applicant has some screening on site and the topography assists in screening. However, the parking lot is not part of the modifications at this time. Site Capacity The district caps the sanctuary seating capacity at 500 persons. The sanctuary is currently about 5000 square feet in area and has the capacity for 484 seats. No expansion of the sanctuary is proposed at this time. The district states that the number of persons on -site at any given time shall not exceed two times the capacity of the sanctuary, with the exception of larger events no more than four times per year. The city may place further limitations on the number of persons on -site based on the number of parking stalls provided. Two times the capacity of the sanctuary would be 968 people. The church estimates that there are about 170 children at the 9:00 am service and 175 children at the 10:30 am service in addition to the people in the sanctuary. Wednesday evenings it is estimated there are 50 adults and 270 children on the property. In neither instance is it anticipated that the expansion will include more than twice the capacity of the sanctuary. Building Setbacks The RPS District requires front yard setbacks of 75 feet, rear yard setbacks of 100 feet, and side yard setbacks of 75 feet. The proposed structural addition is closest to the east property line at about 175 feet. It will not extend any further to the front. The front yard setback is currently 141 feet, which would be reduced to 134 feet with additional right-of-way dedication for Hennepin County. 3 Building Design & Materials The RPS District states that the structure shall not exceed 40,000 square feet in area. The applicant received a variance in 2013 to allow for 80,000 square feet. The proposed addition would make the structure about 43,000 square feet. The structural height limitations are 35 feet. The proposed structural addition is about 25 feet in height from lowest grade. Primary exterior building materials in the RPS District are required to consist of brick, natural stone, stucco, Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) or similar product, fiber cement lap siding, copper, glass, decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block, and/or decorative pre -cast concrete panels. The proposed structure is primarily brick and EIFS with metal cap flashing and stone accents on all sides. Off -Street Parking In the City's parking standards found in Section 828.51, parking is required for this use at: "one (1) space for each four seats or for each five (5) feet of pew length based upon maximum design capacity; plus additional parking for accessory uses and facilities as prescribed by this Ordinance." The RPS District has additional standards stating that the maximum number of parking spaces for any use may not exceed 300. The variance granted in 2013, allowed for this property to have up to 400 parking spaces. Currently there are 296 parking stalls on the site. The sanctuary has 484 seats, which requires 121 spaces per the City's parking ordinance. In the City's parking ordinance, schools are listed with a separate parking demand. Grade schools, elementary schools, middle school, and junior high schools are required to provide at least two (2) spaces for each classroom. High schools are required to provide at least one (1) space for each six (6) students plus one (1) space for each classroom. There are currently six classrooms on the lower level and seven on the upper level. One of the classrooms on the lower level is for both high school and non -high school students. The applicant states there are about 55 high school age students, which would create a demand for 11 parking stalls. Otherwise, the requirement is for two stalls per classroom, which is 13. Therefore, the current parking demand for the classrooms could be determined to be 24 stalls. Therefore, the total current required parking would be 145 stalls. The proposed addition and remodel would result in eleven classrooms on the upper level. The lower level will have eight classrooms. So, there would need to be 11 stalls for the 55 high school students and 2 stalls per room for the other students. This would result in a need for 47 stalls for the classrooms for a total of 168 required parking stalls for the church, which is less than the 296 provided and the 400 permitted by the 2013 variance. The applicant states that it is likely that 1 of these classrooms that is about 200 square feet in size will be converted to office in the future, which has a requirement of 1 space for 250 feet versus 2 per room for a classroom. This would not increase the net parking need. It should be noted that three of the classrooms are larger in size. The senior high room is about 1900 square feet in area, junior high room is about 1400 square feet, and the grade school room is about 5300 square feet. The other classrooms average about 420 square feet each. The parking calculation for the senior high students is based on the number of students, which is stated to be 55, plus one per classroom and the parking requirement for junior high and grade school students is 2 per classroom. If these larger classroom areas were 4 divided up into 420 square foot areas, this would require about 37 more parking stalls, which is still less than the provided amount (205 total required and 296 provided) and would still be meeting ordinance requirements. Using the larger classrooms for general assembly space would cause the facility to not have enough parking. Therefore, the use of these larger rooms will need to remain as primarily classroom or it will require an amendment to the conditional use permit. Property Access The County has provided comments regarding the site access. The County would like to establish turn lanes in this location in the future. The City Engineer's Office reviewed this and found that at full build -out the property will require the installation of turn lanes to the site. The County also is requesting closure of the access point to the garage on the property. This may be accommodated at this time. There is also the request for additional right-of-way to be provided. Landscaping & Lighting Landscaping has been provided with previous projects on this site. For this expansion, the applicant is proposing to remove three Black Hills spruce trees and replace them in a location between the building and the east property line. The replacement trees are proposed at six feet in height. Additional decorative plantings are proposed between the parking lot and building. No additional exterior lighting is proposed. Grading & Drainage The City Engineer has reviewed the grading and drainage and has provided the attached comments. Some modifications to the plans are recommended. REQUEST REVIEW The primary application is the site plan review and conditional use permit. In granting a conditional use permit, the City should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants or surrounding lands. Among other things, the City Council shall consider the following: 1. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity. 2. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area. 3. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 4. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. 6. The use, in the opinion of the City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use. 7. The use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. 8. The use is not in conflict with the policies plan of the City. 9. The use will not cause traffic hazard or congestion. 10. Existing businesses nearby will not be adversely affected by intrusion of noise, glare or general unsightliness. 11. The request conforms to the requirements for churches in the RPS District. 5 If the Commission finds that the use generally conforms to the above criteria, reasonable conditions may be added to a recommendation to help ensure conformance. The lot combination may be deemed acceptable provided the parcel is conforming with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning of the parcel involved with the lot combination may be approved provided that the rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the performance standards found in the Zoning Ordinance. Keeping the residence on the property requires an interim use permit. Interim uses may be allowed, if the following conditions are met: 1. The use conforms to the zoning regulations. 2. The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. 3. Permission of the use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. 4. The user agrees to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for permission of the use. The applicant is proposing to use a future expansion of the sanctuary as the specific event for the termination of the interim use permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION There are six separate actions related to this request: a lot combination, comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, interim use permit, site plan review, and conditional use permit. Staff would recommend that the applications be reviewed in that order, because certain applications are contingent upon approval of others. For example, the proposed rezoning is appropriate only following approval of the Comp Plan amendment. The conditional use permit and the review of the site plan are the primary considerations. The expansion of the use does cause concerns related to parking. However, it does appear that the parking requirements for this use are technically consistent with code requirements. Another concern is related to the septic system and the addition of new bathroom facilities. The City's Building Official has reviewed the septic plans and found them to be acceptable. Otherwise, the building location, materials, and other such considerations are complying with the zoning ordinance and previous variances. Therefore, it would appear that the requests could be considered acceptable. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission found that the CUP and Site Plan Review for the proposed expansion is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and previous approvals. The Commission recommended approval of the CUP, site plan review, lot combination, comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, and interim use permit. The recommendation was forwarded with the following conditions: 1. All parking for the site shall be contained within areas intended for parking and not on any public streets, fire lanes, driveways, or yard areas. 2. The use of the new rooms shall be for accessory classrooms used in the manner described in the applicant's narrative. No change of use shall be permitted unless an amendment to the conditional use permit is obtained and necessary improvements to support the change are constructed. 3. The alternate septic site shall be placed on the site plan. 4. All comments from Hennepin County regarding the right-of-way dedication for the lot combination shall be met and closure of the direct access to the garage. 6 5. The interim use permit for the continuation of the shall be in effect until that time when the church expands the sanctuary. 6. 1542 County Road 24 shall be rezoned to RPS and guided Public -Semi Public in the Comprehensive Plan. 7. All comments from the City Engineer shall be met. 8. All comments from the City Attorney shall be met. 9. All comments from the Building Official shall be met. POTENTIAL ACTION If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission's findings, the following motion would be appropriate: "Motion to direct staff to prepare documents granting approval for the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, lot combination, conditional use permit, site plan review, and interim use permit, related to the expansion of the Woodridge Church based upon the findings described in the staff report and subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission." Attached: Aerial Photo List of Documents Excerpts from December 19, 2016 and DRAFT January 10, 2017 Planning Commission minutes Engineer's Comments dated January 10, 2017 Building Official's Comments dated November 22, 2016 Hennepin County Comments dated December 20, 2016 Applicant's Narrative dated November 10, 2016 Applicant's Plan Set dated December 15, 2016 7 Copyright ©2007 Pictometry International Corp. Project: LR-16-191— Woodridge Church Lot Combination, Interim Use Permit, CUP, Site Plan Review, Comp Plan Amend., Rezoning The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 3 Yes Y Fee 11/10/2016 11/4/2016 1 Y Y $10,000 — D.J. Kranz Co. Mailing Labels 11/10/2016 11/2/2016 4 Y Y Narrative 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 5 Y Y Plans 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 13 Y Y Plans -Updated 12/15/2016 12/10/2016 14 Y Y Stormwater Management 12/15/2016 11/23/2016 165 Y Y Pipe Size 12/15/2016 1 Y Y Geotechnical Report 12/15/2016 11/2/2016 36 Y Y Applicant Response 12/15/2016 12/15/2016 2 Y Y Septic Design 11/10/2016 9/21/2016 30 Y Y Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Building Official Comments 11/22/2016 1 Y City Engineer Comments 11/29/2016 2 Y City Engineer Comments 1/10/2017 3 Y Hennepin County Comments 12/20/2016 4 Y Planning Commission report 12/14/2016 6 Planning Commission report 1/4/2017 2 11 pages w/ attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes M. VanDeVan Email 12/17/2016 Y M. VanDeVan Email 12/22/2016 Y Planning Commission minute excerpt 12/19/2016 Y Planning Commission minute excerpt 1/10/2017 Y Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from December 19, 2016 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Woodridge Church —1500 and 1542 County Road 24 — Conditional Use Permit to Expand Existing Building, Interim Use Permit to Continue Use Existing Residence, Lot Combination to Combine Two Parcel, Rezoning to Rural Public/Semi- Public and Site Plan Review for Addition Sparks presented the list of requests before the Commission from the applicant, Woodridge Church, which is proposing to add a 15,000-square foot addition to the existing 28,000 square foot structure; which will request a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). He explained that the expansion would trigger the need for the church to do a lot combination of the two properties they own and that would require a rezoning of that property to match the existing zoning which allows the church as a conditional use, and advised that an Interim Use Permit (IUP) would also be necessary to allow the existing home to remain. He stated that the IUP would need to include a dedicated end time noting that the church is proposing to remove the home at the next time when they request an expansion. He displayed a sketch of the proposed expansion, which would add space for classrooms, lobbies and restrooms to the upper and lower restrooms. He noted that there are not plans to expand the sanctuary or the parking at this time in this proposal. He provided additional details on the intended use of the classrooms proposed in the expansion. He reviewed the proposed building materials which will match the existing exterior of the building. He reviewed details of the septic plans and landscaping, noting that the landscape items removed as part of this request will be replaced at a ratio of one to one. He stated that the secondary site for the septic would need to be shown on the site plan and noted that the building inspector believes that the modification of the existing septic site will be to code. He reviewed the parking requirements of the site and how that compares to the existing parking provided. He again reviewed the reasons for each of the proposed requests before the Commission. Rengel referenced the septic system, which was noted that it had been inspected and found to be adequate. She asked if that is for the primary or secondary site. Sparks explained that the building inspector reviewed the plans for the primary site noting that the secondary site would simply require soil borings. He stated that the review of the building inspector reviewed the plans for the expansion of the primary septic site and found the plans to be adequate. He stated that the septic plans would be finalized with the building permit request. Paul Johnson stated that there is a secondary septic site already established through previous plans, that simply needs to be included on the new plan. Rengel asked if there is a timeline for the sanctuary expansion. Sparks stated that it was loosely mentioned to take place in the next few years and is the primary impotence for the 2013 variance request. Rengel asked where 1765 Medina Road is located on the map. Sparks identified the property on the map. R. Reid stated that the previously accepted proposal looks similar to this expansion plan and asked if the church chose to not move forward on that plan or whether this is in addition to the previous expansion plan. Finke stated that the applicant went through the process for the variance but the actual plans for expansion were not applied for at that time. He noted that this is similar to the application in 2009 that was withdrawn pending results of the moratorium that was enacted. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from December 19, 2016 Meeting Minutes R. Reid stated that there is a substantial amount of classroom space being added, which would indicate that the church is expecting a substantial increase in those attending classes. She asked if the added classrooms are in reaction to the current demand for classroom space or whether this would be to add classes. Sparks stated that the applicant has stated that they are adding this space to accommodate the current needs for classroom space. R. Reid asked if the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be for the existing Comprehensive Plan or under the new Plan. Sparks confirmed that the amendment would be to the current Comprehensive Plan. Barry asked if the lot combination, which triggers many of the other necessary actions, was the decision of the church or the City. Sparks stated that the combination was a part of the variance approval, which will allow for the eventual removal of the existing home. He reviewed the language of the variance which requires the lot combination with the next expansion of the site. Barry asked if it would be more appropriate to conduct the lot combination when the sanctuary is expanded, rather than with this expansion. Finke stated that one justification for the variance to exceed 40,000 square feet is the aggregate size of the property, which would require the combination of the lots in order to reach the necessary size of the lot. Chairperson V. Reid referenced the proposed conditions of the CUP, noting that number 11 seems to require additional detail. Sparks noted that the standards are found in italics on page two of the staff report. Chairperson V. Reid asked and received clarifications on the recommended conditions and which request they specifically apply to. Barry asked if the rezoning would have an impact on the draft Comprehensive Plan the City is working to update. Finke noted that Plan is not yet adopted so that change could be made. Paul Johnson, Senior Pastor at Woodridge and Medina resident, stated that the when the building was constructed there was an auditorium but the necessary classroom space was not constructed. He provided additional details on the intended use of the new classroom space and the existing gym space. He stated that the growth is determined by the size of the auditorium and explained that currently there is inadequate space for the children. He stated that the intent is to balance out the current needs of the site for children's activities to match the current membership. Chairperson V. Reid asked for information on growth projections. Mr. Johnson stated that there is not a five-year projection and estimated that the church has grown by 150 people, or ten to 15 percent, in the past five years. He explained how churches base their attendance and 2 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from December 19, 2016 Meeting Minutes capacity of their auditorium. He noted that if the church were to experience growth, their next step would most likely be to add another service time. R. Reid stated that if the church is planning to expand to the sanctuary, the church must then be expecting growth. Mr. Johnson provided additional details on the legal settlement that was reached between the church and the City and noted that there are not plans currently to expand the sanctuary. He stated that perhaps in five to ten years they would consider expanding the sanctuary. He stated that an expansion to the sanctuary is simply allowable under the settlement and is not a for sure action at this time. He noted that most likely the church would add an additional service if the demand increased. He explained that the church would need to pay for the current facility before they would consider another addition. He noted that the numbers included in the settlement are those of the full master plan and is not what was asked to be built at any time and simply secures the potential in the future. He stated that this is not a rapidly growing church and is much more likely to add multiple services over incurring the debt that would be necessary to expand the auditorium. He provided details on the different levels of attendance on Wednesdays compared to Sundays. R. Reid asked for information on lighting for the site. Mr. Johnson noted that they have adjusted the lighting to only be on during times of use and to be set on a timer. He provided examples of two services for young people under tragic events that the church learned from and now know how to qualify the number of attendees to determine if the church would be an adequate fit for the service. Barry stated that in looking at the grading plan the drainage tends to head east and asked where the water would travel from the new addition roof. Trevor Grives, project engineer, stated that the roof water will be routed to the existing storage pond on the west side. Mr. Johnson noted that the neighboring residents will not notice much of a difference as there is not additional parking or use proposed and the addition will match the existing building. Chairperson V. Reid opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. Harry Schleeter, 1585 Medina Road, stated that his property is just northwest of the existing property and abutting the property with the home. He noted that he is also a member of the church. He stated that the church is a good neighbor and he does not have any complaints. He stated that he does not see any issue as this will just expand the space for what the church already offers. He stated that his concern would be that in 10 years there would be capability to expand and stated that perhaps that could be more defined. He asked if it would be allowable to better define that type of expansion. He stated that this is an organization inside of a neighborhood of homes on large lots. Written comments were also received from Martha Van de Ven and will be entered into the record. Chairperson V. Reid closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. R. Reid asked if a revision to the CUP would be needed and reviewed upon each expansion. 3 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from December 19, 2016 Meeting Minutes Sparks replied that is correct, a CUP amendment would need to come before the Commission for each future expansion. Albers stated that his biggest concern would be the impact on adjacent property owners. Chairperson V. Reid stated that one of the biggest concerns of a neighbor at the last review was the lighting and since the changes have been made by the church there has not been complaint on that matter. Motion by Albers, seconded by Rengel, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Murrin and White) Barry stated that he struggles with taking action on the lot combination at this time as the remaining actions are a result of solely that action, although he noted that he was unsure of the legality of doing a variance on a variance. Chairperson V. Reid stated that this is part of a legal settlement and asked how not taking action on that item would result. Finke stated that he is unsure and would need to look into that. He stated that the lot combination restricts what could be done, as the site would become conditioned with the same limitations and the scale of development. He stated that if the lot combination is not done and that land is not needed, perhaps then the church sold that lot and something further was developed on that lot as well. Barry stated that this is awkward timing with the updating of the Comprehensive Plan and therefore it seems as if that request should wait until the new Comprehensive Plan is in place. Finke stated that in theory you could do the lot combination without changing the zoning on the other portion of the parcel which would result in one property with two different zoning definitions. He noted that while that could be done, he would not recommend that. Albers asked the tax implications from the rezoning. Mr. Johnson stated that it is his understanding that the property tax would still be required to be paid on the home regardless of the zoning for that parcel. He believed that the Commission should consult legal counsel before making a change to the approved legal agreement, noting that the lot combination is a part of that agreement. Motion by Albers, seconded by Rengel, to recommend approval of the Lot Combination subject to the conditions in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Murrin and White) Chairperson V. Reid stated that there is not a set date for the expiration of the use of the home as proposed. Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Albers, to recommend approval of the Interim Use Permit subject to the conditions in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Murrin and White) Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Rengel, to recommend approval of the Site Plan Review subject to the conditions in the staff report. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Murrin and White) Motion by Barry, seconded by R. Reid, to recommend table the request for rezoning. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Murrin and White) 4 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT January 10, 2017 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Woodridge Church —1542 County Road 24- Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Change Future Land Use from Rural Residential to Public/Semi-Public and Rezoning to Rural Public/Semi-Public Finke stated that the Commission started this process the previous month when they considered a series of requests from Woodridge Church. He noted that the Commission tabled the request for rezoning as there was not a public hearing noticed for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He stated that the public hearing has been noticed and the Commission can therefore continue their discussion and take action on the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. He noted that the rezoning would rezone the western parcel which will be combined with the church property, which was a condition of the variance granted for the ultimate build out of the church property. Albers opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. No comments made. Albers closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. Motion by R. Reid, seconded by Barry, to recommend approval of the rezoning request and Comprehensive Plan Amendment as proposed. (Absent: Deslauriers and White) 1 WSB —® 701 Xenia Avenue South I Suite 300 I Minneapolis, MN 55416 I (763) 541-480011 January 10, 2017 Mr. Dusty Finke Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Woodridge Church Expansion — Engineering Review from Updated Submittal City Project No. LR-16-191 WSB Project No. 03433-150 Dear Mr. Finke: We have reviewed The Woodridge Church application and plans dated December 15, 2016. The applicant proposes to construct a 15,085 square foot addition to the existing structure. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina's general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Site Plan & Civil 1. The topographic survey provided with the submittal is dated December, 2003. Due to the age of the survey, the applicant may want to consider verifying site appurtenances and other attributes. The applicant noted that they will take this into consideration; the applicant takes full responsibility for design changes resulting from any errors or omissions. 2. Sheet C1-1 shows storm sewer removal. Provide additional details and/or a plan for the interim storm sewer condition will be to allow collection and conveyance during construction. Complete; the applicant provided a response and will provide temporary piping as needed from the existing roof drains and route to the existing catch basin in the parking lot. 3. Show the locations of the proposed roof drains. Complete. 4. Provide the geotechnical report dated 11/02/2016 prepared by Braun. Complete. 5. Provide more grading information within the existing parking lot such as spot elevations of curb, directional flow arrows, and percent of grade. Complete. 6. City of Medina standard details should replace Loucks standard details where appropriate. Complete. Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer l wsbeng.como Woodridge Church Expansion — Engineering Review January 10, 2017 Page 2 Stormwater 7. The size of the proposed improvements will require the applicant to meet the applicable City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District stormwater treatment standards. Incomplete, but the applicant is awaiting scheduled board approval. 8. The grading infonnation shown on Sheet C3-1 appears to direct water from the parking lot towards the building entrance and then directs flow 90 degrees to the SE across the concrete walk until it enters a swale that is aligned another 90 degrees to the NE. Conveying runoff directly to a building, especially near an entrance, and across a pedestrian walkway is not standard engineering practice as there can be long term complications and maintenance concerns with this type of design. Consider alternative design to provide additional freeboard to the FFE and a more ideal overflow condition. Incomplete; but the applicant provided additional clarification on this item and the drainage area draining to this location will be small. The engineer of record takes full responsibility for drainage issues that may arise due to this condition. Complete 10. Provide details and calculations for the underground filtration system that show the underground filtration system is sized adequately to meet the City's requirements. Provide calculations that show adequate pretreatment is provided upstream of the filtration system. a. It is recommended that a SAFL Baffle is added to the sump manhole for additional pretreatment prior to the filtration basin. b. Provide additional information showing where the proposed water quality volume of 1,693 cubic -feet is calculated from. c. Provide clarification for the use of a CMP perforated pipe rather than an HDPE or similar material; CMP has a tendency to deteriorate over time. d. The elevations of the proposed system will not allow adequate draw -down relative to the existing pond NWL. A minimum of 3' of vertical separation needs to be provided between the bottom of the draintile and the NWL of the existing pond. e. The City does not allow submerged outlets (FES-10). 11. Provide details for the parking lot curb cut to the pretreatment swale and connection detail between the 36" CMP pipe and the 15" HDPE pipes. 12. Sheet C4-1 Note #7 lists the contractor is to submit shop drawings of underground filtration system for review. Submit drawings to the City for review prior to approval. 13. The pond NWL and HWL should be shown on the plans. NWL and HWL are shown on the plans. However, the HWL value on the plans is not consistent with the value shown in the HydroCAD model. Please revise to the correct value. 14. Note EOF locations and elevations on the grading plan. 15. The silt fence downstream of the new building may cause runoff to back-up into the new building during construction. Consider alternative BMP where proposed silt fence is shown crossing the swale. Woodridge Church Expansion — Engineering Review January 10, 2017 Page 3 Please contact me at 763-287-8532 if you have any questions. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer Metro West Inspection Services, Inc. Box 248 Loretto, MN 55357 November 22, 2016 Planning Commission, City Council, Dusty Finke, 2052 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55340 To whom it may concern: Re: Woodridge Church, 1500 and 1542 County Rd 24. (C.U.P./ I.U.P. hot combo, site plan) I have reviewed the proposal above. The septic review and design by Miller Sewage Treatment Solutions is acceptable. The plans submitted deal mainly with the site and drainage, which appears fine. I would like to meet with the architect to discuss building and fire code issues. Respectfully, Loren Kohnen Building Official Certificate #589 MPCA Certificate #756 HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA December 20, 2016 Mr. Dusty Finke, City Planner City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Re: Preliminary Plat Review - Woodbridge Church Addition 1500 & 1542 County Road 24 Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3553 Dear Mr. Finke: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. The preliminary plat for the Woodbridge Church Addition was received by Hennepin County staff on November 16, 2016. The plat proposes to consolidate 2 parcels in order to expand the existing Woodbridge Church by 15,085 square feet to total 43,154 square feet. The Hennepin County Plat Review Committee discussed this proposal on December 6, 2016, and have made the following comments: Access - This plat proposes no changes to the primary paved driveway to CSAH 24. We request that the gravel driveway serving the vacated garage in the southeast corner of the property (formerly 1432 County Road 24) be removed or redirected internally to the property. In addition, we request that the gravel driveway serving 1542 County Road 24 also be removed or redirected internally. Given the high speed of the roadway (55 miles per hour), we are looking to minimize the locations where vehicles may come into conflict. Right -of -Way - In order to match a consistent 40 foot right-of-way half section, we request a right- of-way dedication of 7 feet in the southeast portion of the 1500 County Road 24 lot. Assuming roadway expansion is unlikely here in the future, our current standards for a 2-lane rural roadway with ditch drainage advise a 50 foot right-of-way half section. In order to accomplish this ideal section, we are requesting a 10 foot drainage, utility, sidewalk, and trail easement. This would allow flexibility for potential future enhancements. Turn Lanes - In the past, county staff and the owner of the property have been in discussion about a westbound right -turn lane being installed at the primary entrance. We believe an eastbound left -turn lane would also be a good addition, however the right -turn lane is the most critical element. Furthermore, the addition of a left -turn lane would likely exceed the scope of the church addition project. If adding a right - turn lane, right-of-way dedication of up to 17 feet in the southeast corner of the lot may be necessary to facilitate the added turn lane width and adjustment of the existing drainage ditch. Storm Water and Drainage - The county roadway's drainage ditch cannot handle water from new drainage areas. Changes in flow will require discharge flow rates to be less than existing flow rates. Storm water and drainage questions can be directed to Drew McGovern at (612) 596-0208, or drew.mcgovernPhennepin.us Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55430 hennepin.us Permits - Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right-of-way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. The county wants to ensure that all vacated driveways be removed and graded upon vacation and the adjacent ditch be extended through the driveways. Driveway removal requires permit and as part of the abandonment of the driveway, the county is willing to provide the necessary permits for driveway removals at no cost to the city or developer. Permit questions can be directed to Michael Olmstead at (612) 596-0336, or michaeLolmsteadOhennepin.us Please contact Bob Byers at (612) 596-0354 or robertbyers@hennepin.us; or Jason Gottfried at (612) 596-0394 or jason gottfriedPhennepin.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, / j. James N. Grube, P.E. County Highway Engineer jNG/jdg cc: Plat Review Committee Mark Larson, Hennepin County Survey Office Woodridge Church Proposed North Addition Narrative for: Conditional and Interim Use Permits, Lot Combination and Site Plan Review 1500 County Road 24 Medina, MN November 10, 2016 I. BACKGROUND in Paul Meyer ARCHITECTS,I NC A. Project Overview The Woodridge Church proposes to add a two story classroom addition to their existing church building. The existing building area of 28,069 sq. ft. will be increased by 15,085 sq. ft. for a total of 43,154 sq. ft. This is just over half of the allowed building area of 85,000 sq. ft., per previous agreement with the city. The proposed development will be constructed of materials that match and complement the existing building. All proposed materials are compliant with the city's ordinance. The designers have met with City staff to review the project. Construction of the proposed addition is anticipated to begin in April 2017 and be complete by December 2017. B. Project Team • Property Owner: The Woodridge Church has owned and occupied the primary property since 1996 and became owner of the adjacent property in 2003 • General Contractor: DJ Kranz Company, Inc. of Plymouth who constructed the 1998 addition to the Woodridge Church will again be the general contractor • Architect: Paul Meyer Architects, Inc. of Plymouth is providing planning and architectural design services • Civil Engineer: Loucks, Inc. of Maple Grove is providing civil engineering and landscape design services 15650 36TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 170 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TEL 763-557.9081 / FAX 763.557.9233 PAUL MEYER ARCHITECTS.COM Woodridge Church November 10, 2016 II. Project Description A. Overall Design The primary church land parcel is 20.28 acres and the adjacent lot is 8.11 acres for a total land parcel area of 28.39 acres. The topography of the site allows for a walkout lower level. The existing building is one story above grade when viewed from the south, east and west. The north side of the existing building has a lower level entrance in a courtyard setting surrounded by two-story exterior walls. The proposed expansion is compliant with the previous agreement with the city, which limited future expansion to the north side of the existing building. The proposed addition infills the north courtyard area and extends both floor levels to the north. The new exterior walls will match the height of the existing walls at 24'-8" tall above grade. The new exterior materials (primarily brick and EIFS) will match the existing materials. Brick will be used instead of rock -faced block at the lower level. Precast stone sills will be provided at the transitions between brick and EIFS exterior finishes. Prefinished metal cap flashing will match the existing, providing continuity. The new north lower level entrance has a canopy consisting of two colors of brick and EIFS found elsewhere on the existing building. The spaces included in the proposed addition are educational rooms for grade school, junior high and senior high aged children. They will be primarily occupied on Sunday mornings (simultaneously with the auditorium/sanctuary) and on Wednesday evenings. These additional educational rooms are being added to better serve a young population that is already present and stresses the existing building capacity. B. Site Design The planned addition will have minimal impact on the existing site because the majority of the new space will be constructed in the court yard area. Minimal impact on existing topography will take place. Only three existing coniferous trees near the northeast corner of the existing building will be removed due to the new construction. They will be replaced one for one, with additional shrubs and ornamental trees added near the new entrance. Several storm water management options have been explored. Due to the shallowness of the existing grades and storm water structures, there are limited options available. We propose to capture the storm water from the new roof area and direct it into the existing storm water management system. In exchange for not being able to treat the new roof water, a new basin consisting of rock, sand and drain tile is proposed north of the existing parking lot to treat storm water from the existing parking area. This approach has been reviewed with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The septic system serving the building will be updated as part of the proposed development. A Septic System Evaluation Report is included with this submittal. 2of5 Woodridge Church November 10, 2016 C. Parking: There are currently 296 parking spaces on site. Under previous agreement with the city there may be a maximum of 400 parking spaces on the property. Only 52 additional stalls maybe added north of the building. No additional parking is proposed because the current parking total of 296 exceeds the number required by city ordinance for the existing building and the proposed addition. The information below summarizes the requirements along with the projected average attendance and parking use. ZONING REQUIREMENT Religious Institutions: one parking space for each four seats, plus additional parking for accessory uses Sanctuary 484 seats / 4 = 121 spaces Pre-school 12 classrooms x 2 = 24 spaces Elementary — Jr High 6 classrooms x 2 = 12 spaces Sr. High 55 students / 6 + 1 = 11 spaces Total Spaces Required 168 spaces Total Existing Parking 296 spaces 128 excess parking spaces AVERAGE ATTENDANCE AND PARKING USE Sunday Mornings 9:OOam 360 adults (75% of 484 auditorium seats) 170 children: 50 Preschool 70 Grade School 50 Jr. High 10:30am 360 adults (75% of 484 auditorium seats) 175 children: 50 Preschool 70 Grade School 55 Sr. high Adults +/- 80% couples = 288 adults = 144 cars +/- 20% singles = 72 adults = 72 cars 216 cars (73% of 296 existing parking spaces) 3 of 5 Woodridge Church November 10, 2016 Wednesday Evenings Adult programs 25 adults = 25 cars Staff / volunteers 25 adults = 25 cars Grade School 100 children = 10 cars (mostly drop-off) Jr. High 80 children = 8 cars (mostly drop-off or carpool) Sr. High 90 children = 45 cars (50% new drivers, remaining drop-off or carpool) 113 cars (38% of 296 existing parking spaces) III.City Approvals Requested A. Conditional Use Permit Amendment The primary land parcel is zoned Rural Public/Semi-Public (RPS), which requires a conditional use permit approval for religious institutions. A conditional use permit has been approved for the existing facility and must be amended for the proposed addition. The proposed use is directly related to the existing land use and is in keeping with the purpose and intent of the ordinances for the zoning district in which it resides. Adequate provisions exist for access roads and off-street parking. Improvement to the utilities and drainage will be made to accommodate the addition. The proposed addition: - will not be injurious to the use or enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity will not impair or diminish the value of other property in the immediate vicinity - will not impede on the development of surrounding vacant property - will not impose additional light, glare, noise or vibration on other property in the immediate vicinity - will not cause any traffic hazard or congestion B. Interim Use Permit a. Under previous agreement with the city, the house on the adjacent lot is allowed to remain. An Interim Use Permit is requested in order to allow the continued use of the house as a residence until such time that the Woodridge Church undertakes an expansion of their existing auditorium/sanctuary space. 4of5 Woodridge Church November 10, 2016 C. Lot combination a. Under previous agreement with the city, the two lots owned by Woodridge Church must be combined before the church building can be expanded. The updated survey dated 10- 25-16 is submitted for that purpose. b. The adjacent lot is currently zoned Rural Residential (RR) and will become part of the RPS zoning. D. Site Plan Review Request for site plan review for a project designed to comply with the Rural Public/Semi-Public (RPS) zoning district. • Sections I and II above describe the background and project description for the requested site plan review. • No variances are necessary or requested. IV. Summary: The requested approval will allow the orderly development of an appropriate existing use. It is in keeping with the previous development agreement with the city, as well as the intent and purpose of the Medina Zoning Code and the City's vision to, "Provide for the compatibility of different land uses and the most appropriate use of land 'throughout the City." SUMMARY OF PROPOSED USES (See Septic System Evaluation Report for water and septic usage) Use: Net Area in sq. ft.: Auditorium / Sanctuary 5,200 Lobby / Lounge Areas 6,100 Classrooms 15,850 Toilet Rooms 1,750 Storage 1,275 Utility space 1,475 5of5 WOODRIDGE CHURCH NORTH ADDITION 1500 COUNTY RD 24 MEDINA, MN 55356 SHEET INDEX T1.1 TITLE SHEET SURVEY CIVIL G1-1 SITE ANALYSIS C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN C3-1 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN C4-1 UTILITY PLAN C8-1 DETAILS L1-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A1.1 BUILDING PLANS A3.1 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A3.2 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS i LL Z V O la' = I N o=13 oV�� = W Z on V �� 0 O = v(13 Zo� C�—- U)O 0O o ?� a PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 PROJECT # 15202.03 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS - 1 0-20 1 6 CITY SUBMITTAL 12- 1 6-20 1 6 CITY RESUBMITTAL TITLE SHEET T1.1 10-25-16 1� •. WEST LINE 'OF NW 1 /4 OF SEC. 23-118-24 • I'- 396.00 Z O 0 O rn \ N 00°01' 466" W N 89°�6' 33" E 268.4Z 4-PID = 2311823230005 y- 68 — - ,� CO----�, O /�-- / / / 0 � / d / // / o \ \ 0 POWER \ \ POLE \ i / 1 I 1 v rn N / / / PROPOSED LOT COMBINATION FOR WOODRIDGE CHURCH IN THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 23-118-23 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA /// I / / _ — -996— i / / / A-- •43-.....-� I1 I WEST LINE OF SOUTH HALF, OF EAST HALF OF WEST HALF OF NW QUARTER, SECTION 23-1 18-24 --Nk 89°36' p-2-"--E\ \ NORTH LINE OF SOUTH HALF, OF EAST HALF OF WEST HALF \ \ : OF ICW QUARTF�, SECTION 23-1 8-24 \ \ 664.4'I\ \ I \ \ \ 1012 - \ \\ �\ \\ \\ I i \ \ \ \ \\ �\ \\-1010 \ \ \ \ \ / / \ \ \ \ \ \ • \ \ \� \ \ \./ / / \ \ �-\ \\ \70 1p08 \ \ \ \ \ / / \ \ \ _� 700 06-, _ \ \ 1 \ \ \� \ \\ \\ \-_/ // /-\ \\\ -` \\ \ \\7 \�\ \tee \ \ , / \ � -_ \ \ \ pp2 \ / \ \ \ — \ \ \ \ i /..--" '.."-'"..'--.. 1 \ \ \ \ /�\\\•-•. -... / \ \ \ \ \ \ \\//i / / // \\ / �� / � \ \ \ \ 9/ / /\ \ / / \ \ 994 � /�_ i \ \//\\ \\992 // / \// \ _ _990- / 1 / i • \N 990, EAST LINE OF SOUTH HALF OF EAST HALF OF WEST•' ,/j , HALF OF NW QUARTER OF SECTION 23-118-24 '� \ \`\'� // / 992\ \ `��-� \ / 1,// /' `\ i ,7 / \ � / / \ I // / /, �994 \ \ \ / \ .Z/ / / \ �// / / —996- \ \ \ \ — / �/ / // // \\ \\ \\ \\ �/ / / / \ / / /998 \ ` \ \ \ �� \ // /// // // /1000\ / // / / \ _� // // / // 1002��-- \ \ / / \ �1 // // -1004--- �\\ / // PID = 231 1823230001 \ / / \ \ / i / /// /" / 1 / / // (/ (/ I I� \\ \ \ I I � III I -- - i II/ i ill II I /lll 'ill ill 'i I l NURP POND I ill 'ill i I 1 /i I II Ill lil li � ill �i� i � ////////r II Il /i/ / I //// / / /// /� -�✓ /- \ // / �// % / / �_./ /,' PROXIMATE � / / � / `SEPTIC AREi� / , / / .� V I // / - / I POWER \ �LE — — O •0 — 0 /� / / \ ,268.47 NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY Lig. PER DOC. NO. 3828811 --------- CO. RD. 1\0. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : \ / / / I I HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER 'HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER TOP EAST PARCEL (PID NO. 2311823230001) The South One —Half (S 1/2) of the East One —Half (E 1/2) of the West One —Half (W 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section 23, Township 118, Range 23, according to the Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WEST PARCEL (PID NO. 2311823230005) That part of the South 1320 feet of the West Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 118, lying East of the West 396 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o : denotes iron marker 917 : denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of two existing buildings, parking lot, driveway, wetlands, topography, and showing the property' s two parcels, which are proposed to be combined. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. TWO PARCELS PROPOSED TO BE COMBINED I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark S. Gronberci Minnesota License Number 12755 Range 23, ,710 eir we 4114,0 *40 .44,00 • 18 --101°1:6- EXISTING GARAGE SOUTH LNE OF SOUTH HALF ."-OF EAST HALF OF WEST HALF OF NW QUARTER OF SECTION 23-118-24 „z2 ,20000 • Total area = 28.39 Acres Excluding road = 27.58 Acres GRONBERG 8c ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINNERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 952-473-4141 O I— mX SO \ m m O I— -10 O Ic m u X/ X V 1 O Z m n o O u Z u u -1 O O Z Z ui 0 0 cn w cr, � cn Iv u, Co Co 1,1^ � W Cr cn cc C y _ 70 m m �_ Y Z 4,. CD CD Y 1— unn N LSD CS)0 Y r unn N Lo cn (:7 Y D r 1— r r cn Y X Z n iS Li/ IOZi L - d32IV 311S 1d101 70 O O c" rn o O Z u H O m X_ Z n n O u O Z I,.) LO CO 0 U-, cn -n LA.) -ex L.)X 03 `l cn -n D X rrI D y m Iv00 'IP us.)0 °r) cn TI Co w cn -n C D r m U Y — .1' C) v N -P —' V) -n .(:) 0., Co cJ, c.n T O H D m w 0 N 0 O -° m m %7 c.r)n = m m Z 'S310Ndd3NDSla ANd HIIM SN33NION3 3HI DVIN00 CINV SNOIIICINOD ONIISIX3 AJIN1A 01 NOIDVNINOD 'SNdld 3S3H1 NO NMOHS NOIldWNO1Nl SNOIIICIN00 ONIISIX3 3H130 SS3N3131dW0D N0 ADVNA00b' 3H1 01331NVNV(10 ON SDIdW SlIVI00SSV S>Dr101 n SISA1VNd 311S 'SN31-110 A9 AlANAS d W0N3 SI NOIIdWN03N1 GM102 0)1Ob9 ANdWWM1S DNIVIdd N011dlnyldp Dd1N(1S Snomdwi :310N All 1S 10403LOTOCIABO.SOJ 1� I I I I 1 1 I • + + ++ + + + + + + +♦♦♦♦ ++ + + + + + + + + ♦ ♦ + + + + ♦ + ♦ + + + + + + + + 4 ♦ ♦ 4�N ♦ + + ++++++++ + + + ✓+ • + + + ++ + +++++++��++++ - ++++++++++++++++++�++++ ++++++++++++++,.. ++ + + + + + + + + + --r + - + + +++ +++++ ++ / / / / / / L / ++ ++ + ++ [+ + -------------}- R + + % / / / ++++ 4 + / / 4+4+ / + + + + + r / ++Y / + } + + E+�+ + k 1 1 I 1 I / z" APPROXIMATE SEPTIC ACK,OP DRIVEWAY CORD\Q 2 ROPOSED LOT COIVBI\ATIO\ FOR WOODRIDGE CHURCH I\ THE \W 1 /4 OF SEC. 23-118-23 HE\NEPI\ COU\TY, VINNESOTA +++ ♦ ++ + +++ ♦ +++ • ♦ ++#+ ####### ####### # ## ### ## ####, ++ ++++ ++ ++++ ++ ++++ +++++++ ++ ++++ • +++♦ +++# ## ### ## ### # # # # # • # # # # + # # # # # # # # # # # • ## # ###; ######• ####++ ####+###### ####### ###################### ♦ + + 4 4 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 4 f ♦ 4 4 4♦♦ 4 4++ 4♦♦♦ 4 4 4 4 4 ♦ 4 ♦ ♦ 4 + 4 ♦ ♦ + + 4 + ++ 4 4 4♦♦♦ 4 4 4 4♦ 4 4 • + 4 4 ♦ 4 ♦ ♦ + + 4 + + + + 4 4 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ + ♦ ♦ + • ♦ 4 4 4 ♦ 4 ♦ ♦ + + + + ♦ ♦ + + # # # # 4 4 # + # + + 4 4 # # # + #+#+# ♦♦+♦♦♦} +++++ ♦♦♦+++ • • • ♦ ♦++♦♦♦+++++ }+ +++++++++ ♦ ♦ + + 4 + ♦ ♦ + ++ + + • i +♦ + ♦ ♦• ♦• + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + + + • ♦ + + + + + + ♦ + + + + ♦ + + + + + ♦ + + + + # + + + + + + 4 + + +\+ + + + + + 4\ + + + + ♦ ♦ * 4 4 + + 4 4 + + + 4 + 4 + 4 # 4 + \+ 4 + 4 + + +\+ 4 4 + + + .\ + + + + + +\+ +• + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + } + 4 4 + + + 4 4 4 + + + + 4 4 + + + + + 4 4 + + + + f 4 + + + + 4 + + + + 4 + + + ♦ + f + 4 4 4 + + + + 4 4 4 + + + + + 4 + + + + + 4 4 + + + r + + 4 4 4 + + + + + + + + 4 4 4 4 + + + + + t 4 + + + + + + + + 4 4 4 + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + 4 4 4 ♦ ♦ + 4 4 4 4 ♦ + f f 4+++ 4 4 4 4++# 4 4 4 4 + 4+'++ 4 4 4#### 4 4 4 f • 4 4 4 4### 4 4 4 4 + f 4 4 4#### 4 4 4 4 + + 4 4### 4 4 4 4 + f • 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + +♦♦♦♦♦♦♦+ +♦♦♦♦♦♦♦+ ++++++ ++++++ ♦ + + + + ♦ ♦ + + + ++++++ + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + ♦ + ♦ + + 4 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 4 4 + + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + b + + + + + + + r+ + + + + + + y + + + + + + + . + + + ♦ ♦ + /4 ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 + + i 4 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 4 4 4 ♦ ♦ + 4 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + + + + f + + + 4 4 4 + + + 4 4 4 + + + 4 4 + 4 + + + + + 4 + + + +/+ f ♦ i + + + 4 + + + + + 4 + ♦ + + 4 ♦ ♦ +/� / 4 4 i ++ % + 4 ♦ + + ++ + ♦ ♦ + + + + + + + +/ % + + + + + + + ++++.+ + + + + + + // + + / +++++++++rY+++++ / +/4 + ♦ + + +++ ++ + + + r 4+ + +� 4 4♦ 4+ ♦ ♦'++++ + + + ++++++•/+ + + + ♦ + + ♦ ♦ # # # ♦ # ♦ + + + 1 ♦ +/ ♦ + + + ♦ + + '+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +. ++ + + + + + +/ ♦ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++ r++++. +++##++6 + +++++++++ +++,r++++++++ +++++++++++++ +tom+++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + r + + + + + + + + + + /+ + +'v +++++++++--r+++++++++++/4 / + + + 7\4 + + + + + + + +' r+ + + + + + f + + ▪ + + + /+%+ + + + 4 4 + 4 ♦ ♦ 4 + + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 4 +� 4 ♦ ♦++♦ •♦♦♦♦++++ +++++++++++++i+ + +•+ +•+ + + + + + +} _ + + + + + + + + + +4t +�+ + + + + + �--+ _ + _ + + + + + + + + + +/ +/ + + + + + + 044 f + + . 4 + + +' • +1+ + +1+1+ + 1 R + �+I �+ • + —----------- ------------------ F HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 3143012 G G HIGHWAY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1448838 / + + + + + + ++++++'++. ♦♦♦+ + + + + + + + + + + + + '+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + 4 ♦ + + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + 4 4 4 ♦ + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++ +++++++++++ ++ ++++++++++++ ++ + ++++++++++ + f 4 + \ ♦ f + 4 + +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f +♦ • • +• +♦ • +• 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + `k 4 4 ♦♦ + 4 + + + 4 + • • • • + + + 4 4f + + + + •+ •+• + ++ ++ +1+ + 1 +++++P++♦+ + + 4 ♦ + + 4 + + 4 •♦ f + + + + + ++++ + + ++ ++++ t++ I +++++ I++++/r+♦+ 1+++7++++ + ++ f +/. + + + + + + + + + + + ++�+++ +}% ++ + + +•+/+•+ + %, •/' + + + + + /+ + + + •+ + • 4+++ + + + + + + + +• + + •+ + ♦ ♦ + ♦ + + •+ + ♦ ♦ 4 + + ♦ + ♦ 4 + ♦t LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : EAST PARCEL (PID NO. 2311823230001) The South One —Half (S 1 /2) of the East One —Half (E 1 /2) of the West One —Half (W 1 /2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1 /4) of Section 23, Township 118, Range 23, according to the Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WEST PARCEL (PID NO. 2311823230005) That part of the South 1320 feet of the West Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 118, Range 23, lying East of the West 396 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. o : denotes iron marker . denotes existing contour line, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of two existing buildings, parking lot, driveway, wetlands, topography, and showing the property's two parcels, which are proposed to be combined. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. Total area = 28.39 Acres Excluding road = 27.58 Acres DATE REMARKS 1O-25-1S TAO PARCELS PROPOSED TO SE CONNED I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1d1111Al9nSg2I J,11D 9 I -9 I -Z I id111w9ns3?J aMSW 9 I -0 I -Z 1d111w9nS aMDw 9 I I I Ci 0 73 z z m °_E C "Ti Z 0 -‹ Z " Mark S. Gronbera Minnesota License Number 12755 lE Paul Meyer ARCHITECTS,INC 15650 36TH AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 170 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 TEL 763-557-9081 / FAX 763-557-9233 PROJECT # 15202.03 PROJECT :. LOUCKS 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 DATE 12-2-03 SCALE 1 "=50' JOB NO 16-403 G�ON3E�G 8c ASSOCIATES, INC. P CIVIL ENGINNERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 952-473-4141 Proposed NORTH ADDITION For: WOODRIDGE CHURCH 1500 County Rd 24 Medina, MN 55356 / -� 0 / STORM MANHOLE --BAF_F_LE \U / / /----- / / / / i i / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ PO\ / i CATt BASIN \ / STORM SEWER OUTLET I I /, 1 l l / 1 // / // / I 1/ / ICI / 11 11 11 II II I/ syNAki 1 \ i FLOOR _ ......... ....__ LEVEL NSP =0 004.9) TRANSFORMER TO (5,AD BE REMOVED BY OWNER / POLE — 0$ • 6 G GG�G / REMOVE ETCH QASIN / Y / / CATCH / \BASII>I / l/ / / 1 I I � I I I I 1 I � 1 1 I I / I I / I I / I STORM SEWER AS NE DF,D 201.5 FOR_BULDTMG,CONSTRUCT4ON \ \ \� I I / / / / I REMOVE CONC CURB & GUTTER REPLACECASTING WITH SOLID GRATE a fTl REMOVE & REPLACE' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 00 AS NEEDED FOR CURB z GUTTER MODIFICATIONS /I /1 / / I / 1 1 I I \ \ - \ —1004, \1 W \ \ 1-00 � \ \ // // 33" 256.0- o / - — / / / / FXI�TINC� -2-5670— EXISTING GARAGE \D N \ r c� SCALE IN FEET SURVEY NOTE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS FROM A SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES MAKES NO GUARANTEE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTACT THE ENGINEERS WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES. DEMOLITION LEGEND: X X X X X X X X X REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, ISLANDS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, AND FENCE REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING SIGNS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING TREES SITE DEMOLITION NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON -SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN AND SWPPP FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. L u- Z � O lam I- � N CO o= -0Cv) oV �� =• W �Z 0 O�v� Z o '5 LO ow a. 0 0_ M Os • N � z t..2 a> J O 6 C7 O a, O N LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 0 v W PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 PROJECT # 15202.03 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS I I - I O- 16 CITY SUBMITTAL I I -23- 16 MCWD SUBMITTAL 12- I O- 16 MCWD RESUBMITTAL 12- I G- 16 CITY RESUBMITTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN +/ 2\m L O0 I— m D O O O � m z < D �z O � �U) z D O m m Oz z m D O m I � o� I O oo + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -r r + + + + + + + + + +-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _� - —� + + + + +_ _- + 4- \ + D0\D - + + + + + + + '_+ + +/ + + + + + + + +' + / •/ + + + + +/ + + -6 + +/ / WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGN TYP-SEE DETAIL SEE SHEET C2-2 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER LINE SEE SHEET C2-2 R \I VOU\D SITE (3) 5.6" CONCRETE RISERS & 36 TREADS WITH HANDRAIL SEE DETAIL 8/C8-1 -X ST\ G CONCRETE STOOP COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANS PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 992.85 BJ LD \G #1500 z ,\ z 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER LINE SEE SHEET C2-2 WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGN TYP-SEE DETAIL SEE SHEET C2-2 3' CURB TAPERS W/ 5' OF FLAT CURB MATCH EXISTING CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYP-SEE DETAIL 1/C8-1 ENTRANCE CANOPY COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS i I+ I+ I f + + + I+ + I + + I+ + + + I+ + ++ r+ + + + + + 1+ + + 1 + + I+ + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + + I+ + + - + + + + + (1-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + 1t+ + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ▪ + — +® + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 EXISTING v 0 rr1 F- oz zm D O m 0 I O co + + �rtKa + + + + ▪ + + + �+ + + + + + r+� + r SURVEY NOTE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS FROM A SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES MAKES NO GUARANTEE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTACT THE ENGINEERS WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES. SCALE IN EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED FEET — X— TE — 6f 0' F�. fL -ET SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CULVERT HYDRANT GATEVALVE POST INDICATOR VALVE LIGHT POLE POWER POLE SIGN BENCHMARK SOIL BORINGS WATER MANHOLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE UTILITY MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WATER SERVICE SANITARY SERVICE HANDICAP PARKING DIRECTION OF FLOW SPOT ELEVATION CONTOURS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN DRAINTILE SILT FENCE CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL TREELINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND TELE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV • PROPERTY LINE PAVEMENT TYPES SITE NOTES CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE PARKING COUNTS • 0 f N'v • VA FM —DT— mnrww-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. 9. SEE LUMINAIRE PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. i o U- Z � O 61' I— N o= 73Cv) 0 V C = W frt= Z ix o cis O c Z o -a 0 c °' owo 0. Oj O 5 a O M O U �d• �,• +, Lr, • c tf Z �'w U � Y _o J >O r, O D3 O (3) 3 O 1 1 O O (V I',- . ■ ■ LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 Q.) z (1.) tn C 11 v W 2 L P oe Q 0 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 FAX 763-557-9233 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS 1 1- 1 O- 1 6 CITY SUBMITTAL I I -23- 16 MCWD SUBMITTAL 12- I O- 16 MCWD RESUBMITTAL 12- 16- 16 CITY RESUBMITTAL SITE PLAN C2-1 SITE LAYOUT PLAN CV I co u� J � J¢ (NI Q=z 0 F-LLJ DU w 0 Cn �W 0cL LiJ 0 J I- wQQ z=D JF--O =Q� �wz oww z00 co co co N N oo z + ,+++ + + + + + + + + + + +( + + + +\ + + + + + + + + + + + +\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + ++ WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGN TYP-SEE DETAIL 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER LINE 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA + + + + + + +++,:++++++ + + + + '+ + + + + + + + + + +. + + + + �+ + + + + + + i.P, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �— + + + + + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + +q,,, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +—� + + + + + + + + „4- + + + + + +- + + a + + + + + +\ ,�• +++ + + + +\ + + + + +\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++ \ + + + + + ++� ++++++ +++,, + + + + + + + + + + + +r� + + + + + + +++++ ++++++ +++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +, + + + + +\ +++++«� +,+++ ++++++++,++� + + + + + + ay/ rt/- + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++ +++ g ++ + +� + + + g+ + + + + ++ ++++++/ +. ? + +, + , +Err4 + + +++� +, 4co + / cr 0 O rn r� S 00\179 03'32" E + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +_ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + tf+++++++++++ �+ + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + ±+ ++++++ +� ++++++ + + + + + +++++++�, ++++++++++ �_+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 540.12 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +[r + +Ce + + + + + + /+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + m + + + + + + 4C0 + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + '+ + + —+- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +- -+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++_+++ BUFFER LINE 40' AV - ETLAND Bp ER AREA WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGN TYP-SEE DETAIL + + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +`,�_ + + ---+--.4- + + + -- �-+ + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +'+' + + + + + + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +c \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ' -- —i- -+- - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + El i + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + � +� + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + + + + + + + +/ N. + + + + + + + + + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + / /7 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + TO 1326.21 EDGE OF WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY OLHAUG ENVIRON ON 10-16-08 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++++++_ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++� +++++.++ + + + ++ +-� +++ + + + + + + ++ .� + w 0 3 cncn0 + ++ ++ ++ +%,,-- EDGE OF WETLAND AS DELINEATED BY ++++. KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL ON 10-16-080_ + + + +++++\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Z + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 \ 00°01'46" W 1\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +• ,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 189.90 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER LINE 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA WETLAND BUFFER LOCATION SIGN \ TYP-SEE DETAIL 1320.06 . 00 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 439. �3) "99 ��199 ��100t 00 00 + + + + + + + �� -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + • + + + + + + + + i m /LH WETLAND BUFFER DATA WETLAND MANAGEMENT CLASS BASE BUFFER WIDTH MINIMUM APPLIED BUFFER WIDTH 40' WETLAND BUFFER AREA 40' AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER AREA MINIMUM AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WIDTH MAXIMUM AVERAGE WETLAND BUFFER WIDTH 15.8 14.5 = MANAGE 1 = 40 FEET = 40 FEET = 138,789 SF = 138,791 SF = 20 FEET = 80 FEET 155 OVERHEAD WIRES 4C 40 SCALE IN FEET SURVEY NOTE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS FROM A SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES MAKES NO GUARANTEE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTACT THE ENGINEERS WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES. w J Q cn Dew.: 0 CC �o< W O O O wQ�z z = z O J F- Li 1- =Q0w D w cn O Li Q i V)0SO N 0-) (f) 40 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. L L° z V O� I— M CO CV o= -0et) oV �� = W Z �% �� ix 0 O - i z o '5 13 CI c 2 ow � a. O I_ o 0 Ln E v , o ,o o M co un O U Lc) � U } Ln d- U yi DzN.cn U U�•Z�� � 7 —I • O n 0O D > O • N O• ; O O N n ■ ■ ■ LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 0 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 FAX 763-557-9233 00> 0 rn u-s u1. M R w H PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS 1 1- 1 0- 1 G CITY SUBMITTAL I I -23- I G MCWD SUBMITTAL 12- 10- I G MCWD RESUBMITTAL 12- I G- I G CITY RESUBMITTAL PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER PLAN C2-2 /+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,, + + + + + + + + __-+ J — -�+ + + + + + + + + + + \+ + + + +t + + + + + + + + + + C M O 0 n D O M m z -� <� �z Oo D m Cn z D� m oz zm D O m I - co I O co \U�P PO\D EXISTING WETLAND/POND NWL=992.00 H W L=994.01 4+ STORM SEWER [E] OUTLET GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL LIGHT POLE INLEt PROTECTION P-SEE DETAIL FLOOR LEVEL o \ll • SILT FENCE PLAYGROUND EXISTING \ SURVEY NOTE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS FROM A SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES MAKES NO GUARANTEE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTACT THE ENGINEERS WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW -IMPACT EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 5. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 6. REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO. B1609833), DATED 11/2/2016 AS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 7. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 8. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 9. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR STORM SEWER INFORMATION. 10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. ENTRANCE DETAIL IN DOSING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CULVERT HYDRANT GATEVALVE POST INDICATOR VALVE LIGHT POLE POWER POLE SIGN BENCHMARK SOIL BORINGS WATER MANHOLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE UTILITY MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WATER SERVICE SANITARY SERVICE HANDICAP PARKING DIRECTION OF FLOW SPOT ELEVATION CONTOURS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN DRAINTILE SILT FENCE CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL TREELINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND TELE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV PROPERTY LINE VA CALL BEFORE YOU DIG1 Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 PROJECT # 15202.03 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11_10_1 G CITY SUBMITTAL GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN i A / / tEl �0\D n n rr FES-10 INV=990.1 a I I I I I I I I ®I I 1 I I 1 I I Q ft Q O W I_ 0 J « i << 56 LF-15" HDPE @ 0.5% STMH-20 RIM=1001.5 INV(E)=992.00 INV(E)=990.67 DT INV(W)=990.38 7 LF-15" HDPE @ 0.0% OUTLET INV=992.00 STMH- (24" RISER) RIM=1002.5± INV=991.00 • << 2= STOR « _ CBMH-100 BUILD OVER EX. 12" DIP RIM=995.5 INV=993.10± (FIELD VERIFY EX. INV, SIZE & MATERIAL) 3 LF-12" HDPE @ 2.0% ROOF DRAIN STUB INV=993.16 (VERIFY W/ MECHANICAL) 0 SEER < 36" CMP UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM (310 LF TOTAL) TOP OF PIPE=994.00 OUTLET=992.00 INV=991.00 DT INV=990.67 BOTTOM=990.50 SEE DETAIL 9/C8-1 n n 08DI << 41 << -77 CBMH-200 (8"NYLOPL�AST) RIM=992.33 INV=991.38 7 STMH-40 (24" RISER) RIM=999.8± INV=991.00 << _ 38 LF-4" PVC @ 1.0% STMH-210 (8" NYLOPLAST) BUILD OVER EX. 4" PVC RIM=992.5 INV=991.0± (FIELD VERIFY EX. INV, SIZE & MATERIAL) 4" PVC FOUNDATION DRAINTILE REMOVE & REPLACE STORM SEWER AS NEEDED FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CONNECT TO EXISTING FOUNDATION DRAINTILE MAINTAIN EXISTING ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION S 89\1/9 26'33r, C:r EXISTING INLET INV=991.00 15 LF-15" HDPE @ 1.0% CBMH-50 W/ HOOD RIM=993.50 INV=991.15 SUMP INV=987.15 SEE DETAIL 10/C8-1 REPLACE EX CBMH CASTING W/ SOLID GRATE O 0 m D O C � 0 Er1 Fri Oz v Oz zFri D M I DJ I O CO i 1 SURVEY NOTE: BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS FROM A SURVEY BY GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. LOUCKS ASSOCIATES MAKES NO GUARANTEE TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CONTACT THE ENGINEERS WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES. N) V J N) SCALE IN EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED FEET � -94 - -FM YTh,TheYWYM h -G/ -0' -F� -EL -C1 SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CULVERT HYDRANT GATEVALVE • f N VA POST INDICATOR VALVE OPiv LIGHT POLE POWER POLE SIGN BENCHMARK SOIL BORINGS WATER MANHOLE TELEPHONE MANHOLE UTILITY MANHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE WATER SERVICE SANITARY SERVICE HANDICAP PARKING DIRECTION OF FLOW SPOT ELEVATION CONTOURS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN DRAINTILE SILT FENCE CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL TREELINE EASEMENT LINE SETBACK LINE FENCE LINE UNDERGROUND TELE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV • PROPERTY LINE • -06- -DT- CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE PARKING COUNTS UTILITY NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2013 EDITION. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: STORM SEWER DUAL WALL HDPE PVC SCH 40 PERFORATED CMP PVC DRAINTILE 12" DIAMETER 4" DIAMETER 36" DIAMETER 4" DIAMETER 7. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OF UNDERGROUND FILTRATION SYSTEM FOR ENGINEER'S REVIEW. 8. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820 9. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 10.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d. WATER -TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. o L T U- i Z O � I- CV o= -0CI o V Ce i • W Z I- O - 0 c Z o '5 LO o0 0. O 0_ OM Li-)U ���c N • u cn z � 'w U � Y J > • I\ 0 D3 o 3 O TD- O O (V n ■ ■ ■ LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 0 1 v W 2 ✓ ne Q PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 FAX 763-557-9233 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS I I - I O- 16 CITY SUBMITTAL I I -23- 16 MCWD SUBMITTAL 12- I O- 16 MCWD RESUBMITTAL 12- 16- 16 CITY RESUBMITTAL UTILITY PLAN C4-1 UTILITY PLAN FINISHED GRADE 4" 4,000 PSI TYPE I CONCRETE (REINFORCE W/FIBER MESH) 4" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED OR RECYCLE, MNDOT 2211) PREPARED SUBGRADE :■ LOUCKS 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2035 DRAWN 2/2016 NOTES: 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY. 2. POSTS SHALL BE: • 6 FT MAX. SPACING. 2 IN X 21N HARDWOOD, OR STANDARD STEEL T-TYPE FENCE POSTS. 5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE GROUND. 3. ATTACH FABRIC TO WOOD POST WITH A MIN. OF 5, 1 INCH LONG STAPLES. 4. ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POST WITH A MIN. OF 3 ZIP TIES IN TOP 8 INCHES OF FABRIC. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER MNDOT 3886 :■ LOUCKS 6 PRE -SILT FENCE ASSEMBLED OR MACHINE SLICED LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3000 DRAWN 2/2016 NOTE: 24"x36" SLAB OPENING FOR NEENAH R-3067 CASTING WITH D.L., D.R. OR TYPE V GRATE. 27" cp, SLAB OPENING FOR NEENAH R-3250 & R-1733 CASTING. 2 v J m Q L •- • • v • 3 a Am- CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 4" - MAX. 10" s • 6" PRECAST REINFORCED amaraff6-agESET IN A MORTAR BED. STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTIONS WITH "0"-RING RUBBER GASKETS. NYLOPLAST SNOUT STRUCTURE OR APPROVED EQUAL. • Z M a,- • • E OUTLET FLOW [MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS IS 6" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. • :■ LOUCKS 1 O SUMP CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4304 B ce ce ]C a 2 0 a LL LL INSTALL WHEN M.H. IS PLACED OUTSIDE OF THE ROADWAY. • ir 0 w In ADJUST CASTING TO %4" - %" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL FOR ALL CASTINGS IN PAVEMENT MANHOLE CASTING FRAME AND COVER-NEENAH R-1733 OR APPROVED EQUAL. INCLUDES SOLID LID & "STORM SEWER" LETTERING. CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS, MIN. 4" - MAX. 10" STEPS 16" O.C. ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE. EXTRUDED ALUMINUM OR STEEL REINFORCED COPOLYMER PLASTIC. FLOW aNINSINIPm RUBBER GASKETS BETWEEN EACH JOINT IN MANHOLE SECTIONS. NOTES: 1. WHERE WATER MAY STAND, TOP OF MH SHALL BE 2 FEET ABOVE GROUND, AND/OR 2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 YEAR STORM WATER LEVEL. 2. ON MANHOLES 8' DEEP AND GREATER A ONE FOOT FOUR INCH (1'-4") PRECAST SECTION SHALL BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY BELOW CONE SECTION. 3. WHEN MANHOLE DEPTH IS LESS THAN 8', A TOP SLAB SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF THE CONE. TOP SLAB SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR AASHTO HS20 HIGHWAY LOADINGS. THE SLAB SHALL BE SET ON A MORTAR BED. 4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUBBER 0-RING GASKETS. 5. MINIMUM BASE SLAB THICKNESS, 6" TO 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14'. :■ LOUCKS 2 SEWER STORM MANHOLE WITH CONE SECTION LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4300 DRAWN 2/2016 DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1-CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX CURB ROAD DRAIN HIGH -FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL POLYESTER SLEEVE HIGH -FLOW FABRIC 2'X3' SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER FILTER ASSEMBLY MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY ///.//-, 27„ /,//o_._/_/ • 27" SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER WIMCO ROAD DRAIN, OR APPROVED EQUAL :■LOUCKS 7 INLET PROTECTION LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3010 DRAWN 2/2016 38 PM EST Q TRAFFIC RATED MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN (BY CONTRACTOR) VEHICULAR WEARING SURFACE (BY CONTRACTOR) COMPACTED SUB GRADE CUT RISER TO FINAL ELEVATION IN FIELD STANDARD 24" GRATE FRAME SECTION A -A IZE, REINFORCING BY ENGINEER PRE -CAST ADJUSTING RINGS (BY CONTRACTOR) J CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS DESIGNED BY ENGINEER NOTES: 1. THE PRE -CAST ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL BE SIZED AND DESIGNED BY OTHERS SO THAT THE LOADS ARE TRANSMITTED TO THE SOIL, AND NOT THE RISER. THE PRE -CAST ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL BE SIZED TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE BOTTOM AREA BASED ON THE ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY OF THE SOIL krrewu" itioNifi% �rnurnoN PaaaucTs Nc. 1001 GROVE.00SORET. NI FAX S13. 5. NOW F.H.avaoossa.n zz FAX si s.azs.eoss ® COPYRIGHT THIS PRINTIS OWN® SY CONRECH RONSTRUGTION PROOUCIS INC. AND MUST BE RETURNED UPON REQUEST. NOT TO BE COPED. LAYOUT r00NTECHID* 0000 EKE MTS.. MANHOLE CAP WITH PRE -CAST ADJUSTING RINGS INSTALLATION DETAILS 311.01101 E MOTE s.taivw MOTE RIPRAP REQUIRED: SEE STD. PLATE 4308 OR 4309 10 GAUGE STRAPS PLAN 10 GAUGE STRAP CONNECTION WITH 1 /2" BOLTS TO APRON ELEVATION 6" SPACING (TYPICAL) 1 /2" ROD SIZE OF PIPE 6„ 8" - 24" 30" - 36" 42" - 54" NOTES: 1. TRASH GUARD TO BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 2. THE SIZE OF EACH TRASH GUARD WILL VARY TO FIT APRON. MIN. GAUGE 18 GA. 16 GA. 14 GA. 12 GA. :■ LOUCKS 3 TRASH GUARD CMP/HDPE APRON LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4307 DRAWN 2/2016 1' (12"-27" DIA. PIPE) 1.5' (30" AND LARGER PIPE) RIPRAP 6" GRANULAR FILTER MATERIAL GROUT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE IV SECTION B-B NOTE: ONE CUBIC YARD IS APPROXIMATELY 1.4 TONS. A 6" GRANULAR FILTER MATERIAL MINIMUM RIPRAP REQUIRED DIA. OF PIPE (IN.) L (FT.) RCP QUANTITY (C.Y.) CMP/HDPE QUANTITY (C.Y.) CLASS 12 8 5 5 III 15 8 5 5 III 18 10 6 7 III 24 12 8 10 III 30 14 12 13 III 36 16 14 17 III 42 18 22 27 IV 48 20 26 32 IV >48 22-28 30-40 32-40 IV 2 � 1 j�j/ j� ,ilili, oe,LiLi1 �1��, Ii� gfteer�pp,Te i!!:!!0. r 1h•ie• h�•/• RIP -RAP OUT FROM THE APRON SHALL NOT BE HIGHER THAN THE APRON INVERT. SECTION A -A RIPRAP ur 1' (12"-27" DIA. PIPE) 1 1.5' (30" AND LARGER PIPE) GROUT GEOTEXTILE FABR C, TYPE IV EXTEND 1' UNDER APRON :■ LOUCKS 4 GROUTED RIPRAP LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4309 DRAWN 2/2016 0 M 18" 36" 24" 1 % TYP TYP r I{ EXP. JT. 711 -111E111=111=1 1=111E111E111- '11=1111IIII1iIII1= �4, 0 O o -1I1-:IQ 1I- 1=1111, 1 11= GENERAL NOTES: ALL REBAR TO BE COVERED BY 2" CONCRETE MIN. CONCRETE SURFACING TO BE MEDIUM BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. 1.5" DIA. STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAIL - SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW CORE DRILL AND EPDXY GROUT HANDRAIL. COVER WITH DECORATIVE PLATE CONCRETE PAVING CLASS FIVE AGGREGATE COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE #4 REBAR AT 12" OC BOTH WAYS TIE STAIRS TO ADJACENT SLABS SECTION - CONCRETE STAIRWAY SCALE: 1/2' = 1'-011 :■ LOUCKS 8 CONCRETE STAIRS WITH RAILING SAND SHALL CONFORM WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 3149 STABLE OR DRY CONDITIONS o°rs°='Oo 0 No o 04, 1°0 3/4" TO 1-1/2" WAIL,/ UNSTABLE OR WET CONDITIONS zQ 2V d COMPACTED SAND SPRING LINE COMPACTED SAND OR 3/4" TO 1-1/2" CLEAR ROCK (AS DIRECTED) IF PIPE SPRING LINE IS LESS THAN 48" BELOW FINISHED GRADE, PLACE GRANULAR MATERIAL UNDER PIPE TO A MINIMUM OF 48" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. SPRING LINE 12" MIN OVER PIPE SAND BEDDING DETAIL FOR HDPE PIPE MIN 4" OF BEDDING USE AS MUCH ROCK AS NECESSARY TO STABLILIZE SAND SHALL CONFORM WITH MN/DOT SPEC. 3149.262 :■ LOUCKS 5 STORM SEWER PIPE BEDDING LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4310 DRAWN 2/2016 24" co ?!.00.0 .4.0 adoeioutootop- igootattioir opoodrime so^-0�=0l•0^• IP I • ==i sesesesoit • • • API • veal gm, • eve eel • • • • l �. ♦ I • I • • - • • dr • I ICJ APSealWeafaajegliFSW‘4(0‘ 'Co* 'Oa' 'Co* ,O r10 11Gi 110 11Q I-\fi 110 110 �,O 110 11Gi r10 11Q I-\R 110 11R %-10 r10 11R 2" i 36" PERFORATED CMP PIPE 994.50 994.00 991.00 990.50 NOTE: INSTALLATION OF FILTRATION PRACTICES SHALL BE CONDUCTED DURING PERIODS OF DRY WEATHER AND COMPLETED BEFORE A RAINFALL EVENT. INSTALL CMP PIPE PER ASSHTO M-36, AASHTO SECTION 12 NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYP V MNDOT 3733.2 WRAPPING TRENCH AND PIPE FREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE NON LIMESTONE/CARBONATE MATERIAL 3/8" MIN. PARTICLE SIZE. COMPACT TO MIN. 90% STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T-99 6" PERFORATED PVC DRAIN TILE WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TP 1 MNDOT 3733 (CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW) :■ LOUCKS 9 UNDERGROUND FIILTRATION SYSTEM TYPICAL SECITON DRAIN BASIN GRATE/COVER 4" MIN ON 8" - 24" 6" MIN ON 30" 12 NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION TOP SOIL THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I, CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. INLINE DRAIN GRATE/COVER _./.Y�'I\\/ THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I, CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICH NYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPT OR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER, TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN OR TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN REPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS IS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST. ©2011 NYLOPLAST DRAWN BY CJA DATE 9.30.99 MATERIAL REVISED BY NMH DATE 03.11.16 PROJECT NO.INAME 3130 VERONA AVE BUFORD, GA 30518 ritstiast PHN (770) 932.2443 FAX (770) 932.2490 www.nyloplast•us.com TITLE DRAIN BASIN 81NLINE DRAIN NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATION DWG SIZE A SCALE 1:25 SHEET 1OF1 DWG NO. 7001-110.111 REV E OPTIONAL CONCRETE POUR RING (FOR USE IN SIDEWALK/DECK APPLICATIONS) (4) (5) VARIOUS TYPES OF INLET & OUTLET ADAPTERS AVAILABLE: 4" - 8" FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL, ADS/HANCOR SINGLE WALL), PVC SEWER (EX: SDR 35), PVC DWV (EX: SCH 40), PVC C900/C905, CORRUGATED & RIBBED PVC WATERTIGHT JOINT (CORRUGATED HDPE SHOWN) 1 - GRATES/SOLID COVER SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER ASTM A536 GRADE 70-50-05, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE BRONZE GRATE. 2 - CUSTOM DRAIN BASIN TO BE CUSTOM MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO PLAN DETAILS. RISERS ARE NEEDED FOR BASINS OVER 84" DUE TO SHIPPING RESTRICTIONS. SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-065. 3 - STANDARD DRAIN BASIN HAS FIXED ADAPTER LOCATIONS OF 0° & 180°. CUSTOM DRAIN BASIN ADAPTERS CAN BE MOUNTED ON ANY ANGLE 0' TO 360°. TO DETERMINE MINIMUM ANGLE BETWEEN ADAPTERS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-012. 4 - FOR COMPLETE DESIGN DETAILS SEE DRAWING NO. 7001-110-045. 5 - DRAINAGE CONNECTION STUB JOINT TIGHTNESS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D3212 FOR CORRUGATED HDPE (ADS N-12/HANCOR DUAL WALL) & NYLOPLAST 8" DRAIN BASIN: 2808AG __ X (1) DUCTILE IRON GRATE CONCRETE WALKWAY OR DECK THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHER GRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I, CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321. BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BE PLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. GRATE OPTIONS LOAD RATING PART # DRAVVING # STANDARD LIGHT DUTY 0899CGS 7001-110-194 SOLID COVER LIGHT DUTY 0899CGC 7001-110-195 DOME N/A 0899CGD 7001-110-197 DROP IN GRATE LIGHT DUTY 0801DI 7001-110-019 THIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICH NYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPT OR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER, TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN OR TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOVVN HEREIN REPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANY ARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS IS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST. ©2013 NYLOPLAST DRAWN BY EBC DATE 11.14.06 MATERIAL REVISED BY NMH DATE 03.11.16 PROJECT NO./NAME rtatiast 3130 VERONA AVE TITLE 8 IN DRAIN BASIN QUICK SPEC INSTALLATION DETAIL DWG SIZE DWG NO. 7001.110.272 REV E LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 FAX 763-557-9233 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11_10_1 G CITY SUBMITTAL DRAWN 2/2016 I / / / / / 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / i / / / / / / / / \\\ � \ /�, \`. LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE LEGEND 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I / / I I Ir\� 1 / 1 I / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / / 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I / 1 / _- 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I ,I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 / + /+ + / 1 + +/ + + / /+ + /+ + -1 / 1 / + + + + / (/+ +/ + + -1 / + /+ + + / + + + + -1 / +/ + + + I / / + / + + + -1 I / /+ + + + 1 / ' �/ + + + -1 / / / / + + + + I I / /+ + + + A / / / + + + + I/ / + + + +/ -1 / / + + + / + / / ' + + + /+ 12 -..7.-L-:,-.:-/ / + + + +/ +/ ---�-_ / / + + + + / + + • + + + + +++1+1 + + + + ----/ I + + + + + _++++I+i + + + + -� ��+ + + + I+� =1-- + + + +/ + _� + + + + / + + + + + i+ +� + + + +/ + +\ + + + + /+ + 1 + + + t + +\ 1+ + + +/ + + -I 1 + + + + / + + + + + ++ + + 1 + + + I+ + + -I /+ + + +I + + + I + + + 1+ + + -1 + + + +I + + + l + + + -F + + -I + + +1 + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + +/ + + + + + +/ + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4, + + + I + + + + + + + + + + + I + + + +/ I+ + + + + + + I + + + + + + /+/+ +t +++// + I T/ + + + + + + + + \ \ \ \ =N= N N N .� --- 30' 60' --1 0 SCALE IN FEET SOD / TOPSOIL - SEE NOTES ORNAMENTAL TREE CONIFEROUS TREE OCOO DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 00* •..•.. .••.•• CONIFEROUS SHRUBS GRASSES / PERENNIALS PLANT LIST KEY QTY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE COMMENTS ORNAMENTAL TREES PR 2 PRAIRIE ROSE CRABAPPLE Malus'Prairie Rose' 1-1/2" CAL B.B. CONIFEROUS TREES BH 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE Picea glauca densata 6' HT CONIFEROUS SHRUBS SJ 6 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis'Sea Green' #5 CONT DECIDUOUS SHRUBS TS 23 TOR SPIREA Viburnum opulus'Nanum' #5 CONT RG 15 RED GNOME DOGWOOD Diervilla lonicera #5 CONT GRASSES / PERENNIALS PM 44 PARDON ME DAYLILY Hemerocal I is 'Pardon Me' #1 CONT THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. CUT BACK WIRE BASKET WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH OR JUST ABOVE GRADE. MULCH - 4" DEEP. NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0" REFER TO PLAN 18" MIN. I 3 L1-1 f SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE. PLANTING SOIL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. MULCH - 3" DEPTH - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING BUILDING WALL (TYP) SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: Deciduous Tree.DWG COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL COMPLETE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR QUOTATION. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND/OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. 011111111 2 L1-1 4 L1-1 11111111,�l1,. 111111111 1114 III III I I „11 IIIII, I I ,I Ili!. 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. PRUNE ANY DAMAGED BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 16"x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. MULCH MUST NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING ROOT BALL SET ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1/2" =1'-0" VARIES SEE PLAN j 1 I D SOIL - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. PERENNIAL PLANTING Coniferous Tree.DWG MULCH - 3" MIN. DEPTH - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. EDGER - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN 12" DEPTH (MIN). LOAM PLANTING LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING SCALE: 3/4" =1'-0" Perennial.Dwg BLACK POLY EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON -GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PROTECT ALL EXISTING OAKS ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING OAKS ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. OAKS ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH TO HIS SATISFACTION THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. L LPL z � O Lim H N -0 cv, oV cer = • W � z �O �� p — z OC o mcp O o O O 0_ www.loucksinc.com LOUCKS PROJECT NO. 16522 PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA / FAX 763-557-9233 PROJECT # 15202.03 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1_10_ G CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 1 1 PROPOSED • EXISTING TILI VEST 100 LO , / / / / / UTILITY / // STA a, I SR. HIGH 103 I // CORR. 111 BBY 101 / / / / / / / / / / CLASSROOM 106 // L —_/—/—/—/—/`i—r`7-7-7-7-7- 107 CORRIDOR 104 JR. HIGH 105 // I 110 CLASSROOMS inr GRADE SCHOOL 108A GRADE SCHOOL 109 108B ecab (40 PROPOSED EXISTING AUDITORIUM/ SANCTUARY LOBBY PROPOSED STORAGE 0 202 LOBBY 201 S-AIR 'A' , / / OPEN TO BELOW LOBBY MEN 206 WOMEN 205 3 ® CORRIDOR 208 LLI a� LOBBY 203 J CLASS ROOM 207 CLASS ROOM 211 i CLASS ROOM 209 CLASS ROOM 210 CLASS ROOM 212 CLASSROOM CLASSROOM LASSROO CLASSROOM CLASSROOM A •, PROPOSED L _ LL Z O OC I— N � C _ 13 Ct) o0CeVC? = W = Z I- C� 0 O C) c Zeecs ���g �O oO o a • � < 00 Z �W Z �Z Q 2 = J O 0 2 0_ Q N LU Z Z_ 0 n PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 PROJECT # 15202.03 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS I I - 1 0-20 16 CITY SUBMITTAL 12- 16-20 16 CITY RESUBMITTAL BUILDING PLANS LOWER LEVEL BUILDING PLAN SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" PLAN NORTH %2UPPER LEVEL BUILDING PLAN Mir A1.1 / SCALE: 1/16" =1.-0" A1.1 EXISTING SPRINKLER TANKS, TYP. UTILITY STAIR SR. HIGH 103 117'-0" VESTIBULE COLUMN CORR. 111 100 WOMEN LOBBY 101 106 I G" X I G" CMU PIER AND FOOTING JR. HIGH STORAGE 110 CORRIDOR 104 i / / / / / LOBBY 109 COLUMN AND FOOTING COLUMN AND FOOTING UP GRADE SCHOOL VVIGX50 GRADE SCHOOL z N W L: o LL Z tes O � I— N 13 C'') O V C = • W =Z �� 22 ce O O C) c Z ee o d -0 ing �O i.� o O 0. Ci C� N z Q CC �< 00 z rn w �z �z Q2 = 0_ J 2 d Q N LU Z Z_ PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 r� M N U M x Q co O n Ln LLI J PROJECT # 15202.03 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS 1 1- I 0-20 I G CITY SUBMITTAL 12- I G-20 I G CITY RESUBMITTAL LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" =t-0" PLAN NORTH A3.1 EXISTING PROPOSED m STORAGE 202 I LOBBY 201 DN• STAIR 'A' i OPEN TO BELOW COLUMN, TYP. LOBBY 204 WOMEN LOBBY 203 205 10/ )71 MEN 206 i CORRIDOR 208 CLASS ROOM 207 1 CLASS ROOM 211 CLASS ROOM 209 1 CLASS ROOM 210 CLASS ROOM 212 PROPOSED c� Z N OVERFLOW SCUPPER, TYP. RAIN WATER-1 DISCHARGE - SEE CIVIL EXISTING -441 PROPOSED ROOF TOP UNITS PROPOSED EXISTING ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT OPEN EXISTING SCUPPERS SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT NEW ROOF AREA ROOF DRAIN, TYP r RAIN WATER DISCHA E - SEE IVIL I /8" / FbOT TAPERED INSULATION, TYP. L 0 w 0 0 z N w L _ LL z O OC I— N � MI ef) o0 Win = • W =z i- C./ O 0 v c zOCcg �O ��g � 0O o a C.i N z CC oc 0 =u" 00 Z �W cfl Z �Z Q2 = J 0 0 = d Q C W Z Z_ t V o ^ �i `� (1./ Z Lu . vzi CU Vf = V ▪ ▪ Oz ' W � .-,►z Q Ct 2P-4 cid = ✓ co o ■■a`n M PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 M M N Ln LI) cri x Q co 0 �n M w PROJECT # 15202.03 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS 1 1 - I 0-20 16 CITY SUBMITTAL 12- 16-20 16 CITY RESUBMITTAL UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PLAN NORTH IA\ 2ROOF PLAN �r A3.2 / SCALE: 1" = 20' PLAN NORTH A3.2 ALIGN EXISTING 1 \ EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST PROPOSED PROPOSED CANOPY MATERIALS METAL CAP FLASHING - MATCH EXISTING EIFS CAST STONE BRICK #2 CAST STONE BRICK # I T.O. FRAMING EL. = 112'-8" UPPER LEVEL EL. = 100'-0" (1004.9') LOWER LEVEL EL. = 88'-0" (992.9') A4.1 / SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" T.O. FRAMING EL. = 112'-8" PROPOSED BUILDING MATERIALS METAL CAP FLASHING - MATCH EXISTING EIFS CAST STONE SILL - BRICK #2- BRICK # I SUPPER LEVEL EL. = 100'-0" (1004.9') SLOWER LEVEL EL. = 88'-0" (992.9') OVERFLOW SCUPPER, TYP. u EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" T.O. FRAMING EL. = 112'-8" SUPPER LEVEL s EL. = 100'-0" (1004.9') LOWER LEVEL EL. = 88'-0" (992.9') EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST I I DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM WINDOW - TYP. l �LJ CAST STONE SILL SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT A4.1 / SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" PROPOSED EXISTING L _ LL Z 0� N 0=13Ct) 0 V C = W Z I— � 2 O 0 = C) c ZeecCi s cn 0 o Q O 0. 7 • t V o CU to = V Oz ' W � - z _ Q P-4 2 = UPch � o ■■a`n PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 r� M N rn �n cri x Q co 0 rn Ln co J PROJECT # 15202.03 PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE/REVISIONS 1 1- 1 0-20 I G CITY SUBMITTAL 1 2-1 G-20 I G CITY RESUBMITTAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.1 Agenda Item # 8B MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: January 12, 2017 MEETING: January 17, 2017 City Council SUBJ: Ellis and Nancy Olkon — Preliminary Plat — 2362 Willow Dr. Overview of Request Ellis and Nancy Olkon have requested a subdivision of their approximately 21 acre parcel into two parcels. The applicant also previously applied for a lot size variance because the proposed lots do not include the minimum 5-acres of contiguous suitable soils required in the Rural Residential zoning district. The City reviewed the variance request in the fall and found that the applicant did not establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance nor established that an unusual or particular hardship exists on the Property. As a result, the City Council denied the variance request. The City reviewed the variance before the applicant has submitted all necessary materials for the preliminary plat to provide the applicant the opportunity to avoid incurring costs preparing the more technical information necessary for the plat. The City is required to take action on the preliminary plat so long as the request is pending. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Willow Drive and County Road 24. The property is zoned Rural Residential (RR) and is guided Rural Residential in the Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding properties are all Rural Residential as well. The property contains a home and three outbuildings on the northern portion of the property on the top of the hill. The property slopes steeply from the north to the south, where the southern half of the property includes a wetland. A grove of trees is located along a drainage way in the north central portion of the property and most of the remaining property is pastured. An aerial of the subject site can be found at the top of the following page. Ellis and Nancy Olkon Page 1 of 6 January 17, 2017 Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Proposed Plat As noted above, the property is zoned Rural Residential (RR). The following table summarizes the dimensional standards of the district and the proposed lots. Required Proposed Lot 1 Proposed Lot 2 Minimum Lot Area (suitable soils) 5 acre contiguous suitable soils 1.3 acre suitable 1.5 acre suitable Gross Lot Area N/A 10.49 acres 10.49 acres Minimum Lot Width 300 feet 250 feet 395 feet Minimum Lot Depth 200 feet 1135 feet 1135 feet Ellis and Nancy Olkon Preliminary Plat Page 2 of 6 January 17, 2017 City Council Meeting The applicant had requested a variance to reduce the minimum lot size of the proposed lot from 5 acres of contiguous suitable soils on both lots to 1.3 acres and 1.5 acres, respectively. As noted above, the City Council did not grant the requested variances. As proposed, neither proposed Lot 1 nor 2 meet minimum lot area requirements of the Rural Residential zoning district. In addition, proposed Lot 1 does meet the minimum lot width requirement of the zoning ordinance. According to the City's zoning ordinance, the Front Lot Line is defined as "that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street. For purposes of addressing a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street." Proposed Lot 1 is 250 feet in width along County Road 24, its shortest frontage. 300 feet is required in the rural residential zoning district. The applicant argues that the plat would meet the lot width requirement as defined in the subdivision ordinance, but does not address the lot width as defined in the zoning ordinance. An existing structure on each of the proposed lots is located less than the required 50 foot setback from the new proposed common lot line. These structures would also not conform to the requirements of the Rural Residential zoning district. The applicant has suggested that one way to address would be to demolish the structures as condition if the subdivision is approved. Streets and Transportation The existing lot is served via a driveway on Willow Drive near the northern property line, and Lot 1 has frontage on Willow Drive for access. The applicant had not indicated how proposed Lot 2 would be accessed until the January 10 Planning Commission hearing. Hollybush Road is a private road, and the applicant has not provided documentation showing the ability to provide access to Lot 2 to the east. An additional driveway onto County Road 24 would likely not be permitted by Hennepin County, especially in the vicinity of the intersection of Willow Drive/Hollybush Road and County Road 24. At the January 10 Planning Commission hearing, the applicant indicated that they intended to provide access to Lot 2 by granting an easement over the existing driveway across Lot 1. This existing driveway appears not to meet minimum setback requirements from the northern property line, although this will need to be verified because the driveway is not shown on the preliminary plat. In addition, the driveway is quite steep, exceeding the maximum 10% slope recommended by the City Engineer. These two issues raise questions related to whether sharing the existing driveway is the best alternative to access Lot 2. The applicant could provide an alternative driveway location which would not raise setback or slope concerns, but has not done so to date. The applicant proposes to dedicate 33 feet of right-of-way for Willow Drive and 40 feet of right- of-way for County Road 24. The City Engineer recommends 45 feet of right-of-way for Willow Drive within 560 feet of County Road 24 and a 40-foot right-of-way for the remaining distance. This will allow most space for future turn lane at County Road 24. It appears that the proposed right-of-way dedication does not align with the centerline of Willow Drive. As such, more than 40-feet and 45-feet of right-of-way would be required in order to secure the required amount from the centerline. Ellis and Nancy Olkon Page 3 of 6 January 17, 2017 Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Wetlands and Floodplains The wetland occupying much of the southern half of the property is identified as a Manage 2 wetland in the City's functional assessment of wetlands. A Manage 2 wetland would require an upland buffer with an average width of 25 feet upon a property subdivision. A "Zone A" floodplain is also located around the wetland area. The preliminary plat did not identify this floodplain even though it is required. No flood elevation has been established by FEMA for this floodplain. The applicant provided information at the January 10 Planning Commission meeting that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has modeled the flood elevation at 979.38. This floodplain appears to lie mostly within the wetland or wetland buffer, but does extend upland onto Lot 2. The floodplain information should be added to the preliminary plat. Tree Preservation There are existing trees around the existing buildings and along the drainage way to the southeast of the existing buildings. Construction on the property would be subject to the City's tree preservation ordinance. No tree removal is proposed for Initial Site Development for the proposed subdivision. Easements/Utilities Standard perimeter drainage and utility easements and drainage easements over wetland areas would be required if a subdivision were to move forward. The proposed lots would be served by a private well and individual septic system. The applicant has identified a primary and secondary septic site for each of the proposed lots, which the building official indicated appeared sufficient. Park Dedication The Park Commission is scheduled to review the plat at the January 18 meeting. No active parks or natural areas are identified in the Parks plan in this vicinity. The Trail plan identifies a shoulder trail along Willow Drive. This shoulder trail would be accommodated within the recommended right-of-way. In lieu of dedicating land, a park fee of 8% of the market value of the land, up to a maximum of $8000 per new lot can be required. Staff will recommend that the Park Commission consider the park fee in lieu of land dedication. Review Criteria According to Subd. 10 of Section 820.21, "the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following finding are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. Ellis and Nancy Olkon Page 4 of 6 January 17, 2017 Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (0 That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way." As noted above, the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot size standards of the rural residential zoning district. Proposed lot 1 is in conflict with minimum lot width standards. The applicant has also not stated definitively how they propose to address the accessory structures which do not meet setbacks. As proposed, the preliminary plat would require at least three variances, including lot size for both lots, lot width for lot 1, and setbacks for existing structures. Staff believes this is a conflict with specific plans and requirements of the City. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed plat at the January 10, 2017 meeting. One resident who lived across Willow Drive spoke favorably of the request. Following the hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the preliminary plat based upon the findings described in the staff report. In addition to the findings noted above, the findings from the Planning Commission included lack of floodplain information and access for Lot 2, because this information was not provided in time for their review. Staff has subsequently reviewed the floodplain information provided at the last minute prior to the hearing. Presuming the information provided by Minnehaha Creek watershed is correct, it should be included on the preliminary plat and may not raise concerns with the plat. Staff does have some concern related to intensifying the use of the existing driveway. The driveway does not appear to meet setbacks from the northern property line and is steeper than recommended by the City Engineer. It would appear that an alternative driveway location would reduce the likelihood of the access conflicting with Willow Drive. Potential Action If the Council concurs with the Planning Commission findings, the following motion would be in order: Move to direct staff to prepare resolution to deny the proposed preliminary plat by Ellis and Nancy Olkon at 2362 Willow Drive based upon the findings described in the staff report. Ellis and Nancy Olkon Page 5 of 6 January 17, 2017 Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Attachments 1. Document List 2. Excerpt from DRAFT 1/10/2017 Planning Commission minutes 3. Resolution 2016-100 — Denying Variance Request 4. Comment received from J. Mallet 5. Building Official Comments 6. City Engineer Comments 7. Applicant Narrative 8. Letters from T. Wexler and J.Haskamp on behalf of applicant 9. Preliminary Plat received by the City 9/1/2016 Ellis and Nancy Olkon Page 6 of 6 January 17, 2017 Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting Project: LR-16-187— Olkon Variance and Preliminary Plat The following documents constitute the complete record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall. Documents Submitted by Applicant: Document Received Date Document Date # of pages Electronic Paper Copy? Notes Application 8/1/2016 8/1/2016 3 Yes Y Fee 8/1/2016 8/1/2016 1 Y Y $5000 Mailing Labels 8/3/2016 8/1/2016 8 Y Y Narrative 8/8/2016 8/8/2016 2 Y Y Narrative -Updated 10/21/2016 10/21/2016 11 Y Y Letter from T. Wexler 1/11/2016 1/11/2016 2 Y N 3 pages w/ attachment Letter from J. Haskamp 1/11/2016 1/9/2016 3 Y N Survey/Prelim Plat 8/1/2016 7/15/2016 1 Y Survey/Plat— Updated 8/23/2016 1 Y N Survey/Plat — Updated 8/30/2016 8/28/2016 1 Y N Survey/Plat— Updated 9/1/2016 9/1/2016 1 Y N Septic Designs 8/1/2016 7/29/2016 9 Y Y Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies Document Document Date # of pages Electronic Notes Building Official Comments 8/10/2016 1 Y City Engineer Comments 8/9/2016 1 Y Hennepin County Comments 8/3/2016 1 Y Incomplete Planning Commission report 9/8/2016 5 11 pages with attachments Legal Notice Legal Notice 12/31/2016 1 Planning Commission report 1/3/2017 5 25 pages w/ attachments Public Comments Document Date Electronic Notes J. Mallet Letter 9/13/2016 Y Planning Commission minute excerpt 9/13/2016 PCExcerpt Planning Commission minute excerpt 1/10/2017 PCExcerpt-01-10-2017 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT January 10, 2017 Meeting Minutes Public Hearing — Ellis and Nancy Olkon — 2362 Willow Drive — Preliminary Plat for a Two Lot Subdivision Finke provided background information noting that the Commission previously considered a variance to the minimum lot size for a two -lot subdivision. He advised that the City Council denied the request. He noted that at the time of original submission the preliminary plat was not yet completed and therefore was not fully reviewed at the time of the variance request and therefore the City must still take action on the preliminary plat. He reviewed the proposed details, noting that the lot split dimensions are still the same as they were in September when the Planning Commission last considered the request. He noted that both lots one and two would not meet the minimum lot standards. He stated that findings were provided in the staff report that support denial of the request. He noted that the applicant is present and this item also requires a public hearing. Tom Wexler, Edina resident, stated that he is a retired judge and probably the least knowledge person that will speak on these matters tonight. He referenced a letter from Jennifer Hamstead that was provided to the City today, in addition to a letter he also submitted. He stated that the objections raised by staff may be technically correct but subjected that they are de minimis under the circumstances and hoped the Commission has the ability to use their judgement as to what is reasonable and necessary to preserve the health and welfare of Medina. He agreed that lot two does not meet the minimum lot width if you measure the frontage along County Road 24 but noted that it is an irregular shaped lot. He stated that an opinion in the letter provided by Ms. Hamstead is that lot width should be measured on the roadway of the access, which is along Willow Drive. He stated that the floodplain elevation was mentioned and Minnehaha Creek visited the property and determined that none of the floodplains would extend into the buildable area or the area proposed for septic systems. He stated that both lots are over five acres in size and therefore believed that perhaps it was the suitable soils stipulation that is a problem. He referenced a letter from Loren Kohen, the City's building official, who states that there are suitable soils on both proposed lots for septic systems. He stated that all the agencies and attorneys that he has contacted have stated that there is no authority for the proposition that five acres of suitable soils are required for a safe and effective septic system. He noted that one acre is the standard for a safe and effective septic system. Barry stated that the role of the Planning Commission is to follow the ordinances and regulations of the City and therefore the ordinance states that five acres of suitable soils are required as a minimum lot size within the rural residential zoning district and therefore the Commission must follow that. Rengel stated that because there is such as disparity from what is proposed to the regulation, the Commission could not support that level of disparity under the variance request. Mr. Wexler stated that if the Commission has discretion he would ask that they use that. He stated that in his time as a judge he did use discretion at times when he was asked to enforce a matter that was not appropriate. He noted that these are two ten -acre lots. R. Reid stated that the Commission does not have the amount of discretion available to make such an extensive exception to the five acre suitable soils requirement and therefore felt that the Commission must recommend denial. She noted that the applicant can bring their request forward to the City Council. Ellis Olkon stated that this is a preliminary plat division, noting that he is not requesting to build on the property but simply to split the lot. He stated that you would not need five contiguous acres if someone is not building on it right now. He stated that they would simply like to split the lot in half at this point. He stated that since 1999 the City of Medina has never prevailed on the issue of five acres of contiguous suitable soils. He asked that the Commission give no recommendation if they cannot support the request. He noted that he would like to save the City legal fees if this does need to go forward to court. 1 Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT January 10, 2017 Meeting Minutes Albers opened the public hearing at 8:42 p.m. Margaret Invie stated that she lives across from the Olkons and she does not understand why the City would not allow the property to be split into two parcels. She noted that if divided each lot would be ten acres in size. Mr. Olkon noted that the neighbor to the north also wrote a letter in support which was provided in August. He stated that he also spoke with several residents in Hollybush that do not object to his proposal. He stated that he has not found one person that objects to the request and asked that the City save itself legal fees. Albers closed the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. Rengel asked if the original request is being reconsidered. Finke explained that requests often require more than one element and explained that the City has only acted on the variance and therefore action will still be needed on the plat. Murrin asked if there is a requirement that each plat have five acres of contiguous suitable soils. Finke confirmed that is the minimum lot size as defined in the rural residential zoning district. Murrin stated that the only option would then be to deny the request because the lot size does not meet the requirements of the zoning district. Albers noted that another option would be to not take action. Murrin stated that the job of the Commission is to provide a recommendation and therefore a recommendation should be made one way or the other and confirmed the consensus of the Commission. Finke provided additional details on lot width and how that is calculated under City Code. Wexler asked if the lot line could be changed a bit to comply with the lot width requirement. Finke stated that lot lines could be modified but is not what is proposed. Motion by Murrin, seconded by Rengel, to recommend denial of the proposed preliminary plat by Ellis and Nancy Olkon at 2362 Willow Drive based upon the findings described in the staff report. (Absent: Deslauriers and White) 2 Member Pederson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO.2016-100 RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCE REQUEST OF ELLIS AND NANCY OLKON AT 2362 WILLOW DRIVE WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Ellis and Nancy Olkon (the "Owners"), own property in the City at 2362 Willow Drive which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Owners have requested a variance to decrease the minimum lot size requirement from five acres of contiguous soils suitable for a standard sewage disposal system to 1.31 acres of contiguous soils suitable for a standard sewage disposal system for Lot 1 and 1.55 acres of contiguous soils suitable for a standard sewage disposal system for Lot 2 to allow for a subdivision of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested variance at a duly noticed public meeting on September 13, 2016 and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the requested variance and reviewed the request at the November 1, 2016 meeting; and WHEREAS, based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council on the above dates as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council makes the following findings of facts in regards to the variance request: 1. The proposed variance is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning and subdivision ordinances because the requested variance involves substantial deviations from established minimum lot standards for suitable soils for septic systems. 2. The Owners have not established that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. 3. The Owners have not established that an unusual or particular hardship exists on the Property. 4. No variance is needed to allow the Property to be used in a reasonable manner. Its use as a single lot is reasonable in light of the serious limitation of suitable soils on the Property. Resolution No. 2016-100 December 20, 2016 5. Granting the variance would confer upon the Owners special privileges that are denied to owners of other lands within the Rural Residential zoning district because the requested variances would likely be unprecedented. 6. The circumstances and conditions upon which the variance request is based are not unique to the Property, but instead are common to other parcels of land within the City, many of which have similar limitations on suitable soils. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby denies the requested variance to reduce the required minimum lot size. Dated: December 20, 2016. By: Attest: By: JodiI. Gallup, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Anderson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bob Mitchell, Mayor Anderson, Cousineau, Martin, Mitchell, Pederson And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-100 2 December 20, 2016 Dusty Finke From: Scott Johnson Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 3:23 PM To: Dusty Finke Cc: 5pu5bl5ic@usa.net Subject: FW: Olkon variance Hi Dusty, Please add Judy and Chris Mallett's comments to the public record for the Planning Commission tonight. Thanks, Scott From: MIS [mailto:5pu5b15ic@usa.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 3:20 PM To: Scott Johnson Subject: Olkon variance Dear Scott, Because we are unable to attend the hearing tonight, we would appreciate your providing this note to the City of Medina Planning Commission for tonight's hearing on item #2 "Ellis and Nancy Olkon". The Olkons are our southern neighbor whose northern boundary is completely contiguous with our southern boundary. We have known the Olkons since 2007 when we became Medina residents and their neighbor. We do not pretend to understand the issues involved in granting or denying the Olkons' request for a variance, but we do understand that the City of Medina is involved in an intensive and extensive review and adoption of a New Comprehensive Plan that will affect the future of Medina for years to come. As residents, we rely on the Planning Commission and City Council to make decisions in the best interests of the city as a whole and of its constituents. Thus we ask you to please extend every courtesy in reviewing the Olkons' request, particularly considering their extreme personal circumstances. If there is a stone to lift, please lift it to see if there is any relief that can be granted to them and still stay within the borders of the Commission's and Council's citywide responsibilities. Thank you for your consideration. Judy and Chris Ma!lett 2492 Willow Drive, Medina MN 55340 1 METRO WEST INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. Loren Kohnen, Pres. August 10, 2016 TO: Debra Petersen FROM: Loren Kohnen RE: Preliminary Plat Lot Split 2363 Willow Drive N. (763) 479-1720 FAX (763) 479-3090 Mtrowst76@aol.com 1) I have reviewed the septic design provided for what would be a new lot. 2) The septic design meets all the requirements of M.P.C.A. Rules, 7080, 7081, 7082. 3) Roth sites must be fenced and protected before any construction or site work is started, and remains in place. 4) A new design for a mound style system which will match the requirement for the proposed home to be built, will be required. LK:jg Box 248, Loretto, Minnesota 55357 Dusty Finke From: Tom Kellogg <TKellogg@wsbeng.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 11:02 AM To: Debra Peterson; Batty, Ronald H. Cc: Jim Stremel Subject: RE: Olkon Application - LR-16-187 Deb, My preliminary comments are shown below. Please let me know if you have questions or need anything else. • Willow Drive and County Road 24 rights -of -way should be dedicated as part of this plat. • The roadway easement discussed in their narrative should be shown on the plat. • It appears there are wetlands on the property. All wetlands should be delineated and appropriate easements over these wetlands should be shown on the plat. • 5' interior and 10' exterior perimeter drainage and utility easements should be shown on the plat. • The plat should be submitted to Hennepin County for their review and comment. • The City should consider obtaining additional right-of-way along Willow Drive for the future trail on the shoulder shown on the Future Facility Planning Map. Thanks, Tom Tom Kellogg Senior Project Manager d: 612-209-5113 1 c: 612-209-5113 WSB & Associates, Inc. I Oddfellows Building 23 2nd Street SW Suite #200 I Rochester, MN 55902 r tarTribune 2012120141811E1202 HT r9FIRM 31hEli 11710LP This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. From: Debra Peterson [mailto:Debra@ci.medina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 10:01 AM To: Tom Kellogg; Batty, Ronald H. Subject: Olkon Application - LR-16-187 Please review the attached application request for a Variance and Preliminary Plat. The Narrative is new. Please review by the 12tn 1 Date: October 21, 2016 Medina City Council 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55430 Re: Supplemental Narrative Dear Mayor Mitchell and Honorable City Council Members: We are writing to request that the City Council grant variances from current city ordinances to allow us to subdivide our 21.8-acre property (2362 Willow Drive North) in half and grant a preliminary plat. Such action is fundamentally fair, follows through on promises the City of Medina made to us in 1986-1987, and is in keeping with the soil standards as established by governmental agencies to protect the health, safety, and welfare of city residents. As the 1986 minutes of the City Council minutes [Exhibits 3 — 6] clearly demonstrate, Thomas °gland's', our neighbor to the east, had a difficult journey to establishing the Hollybush Hills development. In 1986, he had been involved in protracted negotiations with his neighbors and the City of Medina to build the Hollybush Hills subdivision. The Hollybush Hills was to be on 50+ acres of land, subdivided to build eight homes of about 4 to 6 acres each. For that to be granted, the City Council told °gland that he needed a driveway connecting Hollybush Hills Subdivision to Willow Drive South on land we own. We initially refused the °glands' many requests. As a result, the °glands tried to persuade several owners on Mohawk Drive (Exhibit 6) on his east to grant an easement. On April 20, 1988, we relented and granted the easement for no monetary consideration. The reasons for this are explained in our letter to the Planning Commission; in short, we had granted the easement as a result many promises by Mayor Tom Anderson, Wilfred Sherer, Anne Theis and several other city officials in at least one open Council meeting and several private meetings. Unfortunately, the 1986 City Council minutes do not reflect these promises because in the 1980s all discussions and testimony was not recorded and went into the record in a short summary fashion (Ex. 1 & 2 affidavits of Ellis and Nancy Olkon). If the City refuses to grant us a Variance, we would be injured because of our detrimental reliance by past City Council elected officials and others. There are other compelling reasons to grant us this Variance. Thomas Ogland is referred to as Thomas Ogdahl in the letter to the Medina Planning Commission, dated August 8, 2016. 1. Dividing our land in half would neither alter the rural character nor affect the natural beauty of the area as the two plats will be over 10 acres each -- within the meaning of the City's comprehensive plan which establishes a maximum density of one lot per 10 gross acres. 2. This would not establish a precedent, as ours is a unique situation based upon a promise of a plat subdivision to the Olkons in consideration of the Olkons granting an easement to the Oglands. 3. Our neighbors support our request. a. The Planning Commission sent out 35 notices for the September 13t meeting. No one appeared in opposition and the neighbors most affected supported our request for a Variance (See letter to Scott Johnson dated 9/13/2016). �� g 4. We never received notice of the 1999 proposed Ordinance requiring 5 contiguous acres of suitable soil and the grandfathering clause(See Ex. 7). 5. Our updated soil survey, proposed plat division, and wetlands delineations clearly state that we have suitable soils to build two 5 bedroom homes on the east and west with two suitable sites for two septic systems on both the east and west sites. Please see Loren Kohnen report. According to Minnesota Rule 7080, "the minimum acceptable contiguous soil area is generally (1) acre, which allows enough space for a primary and secondary drain field." 6. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located. 7. There is recent precedent for the City Council granting us this variance. For example, the City of Medina has settled litigation with Deerhill (previously known as Stonegate) that allows for 41 plats with about 2 acres each and granted last year a variance on the Buehler property of 3.5. Even though the Planning Commission was divided 3 to 3. 8. See attached response to City Planner report and Planning Commission meeting of September 13, 2016. Ellis and Nancy Olkon 2362 Willow Drive North Medina, MN. 55340 [1] Thomas Ogland is mistakenly referred to as Thomas Ogdahl in the letter to the Medina Planning Commission. RESPONSE TO CITY PLANNER REPORT DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 1. If the Council minutes were complete, we would be confident that it would support our case. Unfortunately, the minutes are in summary form. An hour of the meeting is reduced to a few sentences. Nevertheless, the minutes -- when taken in their totality -- support our claim that promises were made that we would be able to subdivide our property at the appropriate time. 2. There is nothing in his report stating that we are grandfathered in. 3. Mr. Finke advocates that other property owners are similarly situated without giving evidence or statistics to substantiate this claim. RESPONSE TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2016 1. At the Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Finke responded to a question of how many people are similarly situated by replying "that there are 108 parcels...". This wrongly implied that 108 property owners would be able to apply for a subdivision if ours was granted. But Mr. Finke supplied no evidence to this effect. Indeed, one week later, Finke stated at a meeting with Robin Benson, Administrator Scott Johnson, and myself that 108 parcels was a mere guess and, in fact, he does not know the actual number of similarly situated property owners. 2. Mr. Finke also errantly told the Commission that they had to either recommend approval or denial, when in fact the Commission could have issued " no recommendation" to the City Council. Finke noted that "there did not appear to be a reason for the Commission to not make a recommendation." At the Commission meeting, based on Finke's statement, Chair Victoria Reid noted before the vote "that the Commission must make a decision and the Council can consider other circumstances during their review." She stated that as much as she would like to recommend approval, she simply cannot. At the meeting a week later, Finke admitted that the Commission could come up with a "no recommendation". AFFIDAVIT OF NANCY K. OLKON I, Nancy K. Olkon, being first duly sworn do depose and state: 1. I had numerous meetings with Thomas Ogland and Wilfred Hunk Scherer in 1986, 1987, and 1988 as it relates to the proposed Hollybush development. 2. I attended at least one Council meeting where it was discussed by a Medina city official whose name I cannot remember that if my husband and I granted an easement to the Ogland's we would be able to subdivide our 21 plus acres in half in the distant future when we got elderly. 3. I am currently disabled and it would be difficult for me to attend your meetings on our request for a Variance. 4. We would have never signed the easement on April 20, 1988 if there had not been promises both at a Council meeting and in private meetings. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. Dated: K 11� Nancy K. on o Subscribed and sworn to before me This 2 �S day of September, 2016 � � �/F 1\0 ROBERT TAYLOR BAGGOiT NOTARY PUBLIC- BINNEJan. A 9 A� C mWks) ks) Jan. J 11 2021 m. Notary Public AFFIDAVIT OF ELLIS OLKON I, Ellis Olkon, being first duly sworn do depose and state: 1. In early 1986 and 1987, I had numerous meetings with Mayor Thomas Anderson, Councilpersons Wilfred Scherer and Anne Theis, City Planning Commission member Stephen Schmit, both privately and publicly, as it related to Thomas and Phyllis Oglands application to subdivide their 50 acres for a housing development, later known as Hollybush; 2. Thomas Ogland, my neighbor on my east, made numerous visits to my home in early 1986 discussing his desire to subdivide his land into 8 plats before and after his other alternative on Mohawk Drive was also denied by several landowners to his east; 3. Nancy and I refused all of his requests in 1986; 4. We granted the easement in early 1988 after we were convinced by city officials that the easement would benefit ourselves as well as the Oglands and the City of Medina; 5. After the September 13, 2016 planning commission meeting, I examined the 1986, 1987, and 1988 council minutes and, to my dismay, the minutes were skeletal accounts of the meetings and did not include the text clearly demonstrating that the City of Medina had granted us a future subdivision. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. Subscribed and sworn to before me this —day of October, 2016 fti2c41: 5)krA,‘ Ellis Olkon ROOT A KOCH HOMY RELIC - MINNESOTA My CarrN lion &Ores Jan. 31, 2020 2 1 graaients was to calculate the leachate/groundwater dilution and travel time. He further suggested that no garbage be allowed in Areas 2, 3, 4, until the items are completed. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Heideman to authorize the City Clerk t6 write a letter to Woodlake informing them of the recommendations made by Bruce Liesch and Associates and direct them to proceed according to those recommendations. Motion declared carried Moved by Heideman, seconded by Scherer to note receipt of the Woodlake Sanitary Service letter, dated June 3, 1986, concerning status of the Leachate Collection System and prep- aration of Area 2.. Motion declared carried Schlosser Subdivision Council discussed request for final subdivision approval of Leonard and Bernice Schlosser's subdivision, Maple Trail Addition. Glenn Cook recommended that the road width be 30 ft. rather than 24 ft., as previously dis- cussed Greg Ebert agreed that the old, exixting house on the property would be removed by August 31. Donna Roehl stated that the Park Dedication fee would be $3780.00. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Scherer to authorize preparation of a resolution granting final approval to Maple Trail Addition, with payment of $3780 for Park Dedication fee; private road to be 30 ft. in width; removal of the existing house by August 30, 1986 and execution of a private road agreement. Motion declared carried Thomas Ogland Subdivision Council discussed Thomas Ogland's plans to subdivide 62 with entrance onto Co. Rd. 24, at the intersection with Willow Dr., into 8 lots. • Anne Heideman asked that the right-of-way on Medina Rd. be verified. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Heideman to authorize preparation of a resolution granting preliminary approval to Thomas gland's subdivision,.Hollybush Hills, according to recomm- endations made by the ,Planning Commission, }.nc Ing pr%yate roadway agreement with road built to pity specifications;' park deAiCatS.o" e on Lot 2, Block 1; Lots 4., 5, Block 2; and Lot"l,`,Blo,lel; rdrainage and berming to beyapproved by staff; verification of road - right -of -way and payment of administration fees. Motion declared carried 6_30 6 6r,/4n uj Dennis Peterson/Phil Johnson, Subdivision Council reviewed application of Dennis Peterson and Phil Johnson to subdivide 20 acres on Tamarack Dr. Council discussed the need to verify whether or not Art Peabody had provided the 30 ft. easement on his property, for the proposed road. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Reiser to authorize preparation of a resolution granting preliminary approval to the Peterson/Johnson subdivision on gamarack Dr. according to Planning Commission recommendations; the collection of park dedication fees on all three lots; Tamarack dr., right-of-way, to be secured; ponding and drainage easement to be provided and approved; road agreement to include proper width for road easement; determin- ation as to whether or not Art Prabody included a 30 ft. easement on the north side of the road easement. Motion declared carried Cavanaugh/Dabrowski, Subdivision Council discussed the application subdivision into three parcels. Moved by Reiser, seconded by Mitchell Dabrowski subject to payment of the propoerty; houses be built approve location of the utility Motion declared carried for combiniation of six. lots in Independence Beach and to approve the combination/subdiviion of the Cavanaugh, lz sewer/water assessments; old debris to be removed from according to prepared building envelope and the city to easement. Fx 3 JoEllen Hurr explained that the easement for the private road has an area that is only 30 feet in width and the city is holding bond funds until the easement question is resolved. Donna Roehl asked that Council take some action regarding the release of the escrow funds as she has had telephone calls from Art Peabody and his bank asking for release. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Scherer to retain the Peabody escrow funds until the private road easement problem is resolved. Motion declared carried 12' Hennepin County Park Reserve District, Signs JoEllen Hurr explained that the Park Reserve District has twelve signs of 501 sq. ft. and are requesting a permit for 2, two sided signs 27" by 87" each. She stated that they have 2500 acres of land and she believed the request is not unreasonable. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Schere to issue the sign permits to Hennepin County Park Reserve District for the two identification signs. Motion declared carried Tom Ogland, Hollybush Hills Subdivision Moved by Scherer, seconded by Heideman to table action on the Hollybush Hills subdivision until September 16, 1986, pending resolution of ownership and plat signing. Motion declared carried ke Landfill JoEllen Hurr reported on the Woodlake Landfill tour and those who had attended and also explained that there are three meetings scheduled in September before the Metro- politan Council to consider the expansion. Thomas Anderson asked that Council address the letter from the Citizens Opposed to Woodlake Landfill regarding the hiring of an attorney who specializes in waste manage- ment issues. Anne Heideman asked what was unique about the group of attorneys that had been suggested. She asked that Council acknowledge receipt of the letter but do not believe that it is necessary to proceed with their suggestion, at this time. Hwy. 55 Moratorium JoEllen Hurr stated that the report from Dahlgren and Associates had been received and she would be scheduling a meeting for the committee. Planning Workshop Moved by Heideman, seconded by Scherer to authorize JoEllen Hurr to attend a workshop ON Hazardous Waste on October 24, 1986 for a fee of $125.00. Motion declared carried 5. TWIN CITY MONORAIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDS Council discussed the Joint Powers Agreement between the cities of Glenwood and Medina for application to the State of Minnesota for Economic Development Funds for Twin City Monorail's purchase of a company in North Carolina that will be moved to Minnesota. Robert Mitchell suggested that Item 2 be changed to include a limit of $5000 for fees incurred to prepare the application and charged to the cities at 60% Glenwood, 40% Medina. Also Item 4 to be changed to include reviewal and approval by Medina. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Heideman to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Glenwood for the purpose of making application for Minnesota Economic Development funds on behalf of Twin City Monorail, subject to inclusion of the changes suggested above. Motion declared carried f 6. BUILDING INSPECTING CONTRACT Moved by Reiser, seconded by Heideman to enter into contract with Loren Kohnen according to prepared contract. Motion declared carried g• Donna Roehl stated that the County Sheriff's Department would answer all calls in Medina when a Medina officer is not on duty. 7. POLICE OFFICER COURT TIME Donna Roehl explained that Mark Moran had requested overtime pay for a court appearance; that he would not have to appear for to many more cases as the petty misdemeanors would be dismissed and that no court appearances were scheduled for Robert Anderson or Michael Sankey. She stated that she had asked Attorney, Dayle Nolan for her opinion and she advised that because there wer very few cases pending it would be better to pay the overtime than to not have the officer appear in court or to have to settle the issue in some other way. She also reported that two other nearby cities pay overtime as part of an employee leaving service. 8. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Wright -Hennepin Electric Moved by Scherer, seconded by Reiser to adopt Resolution 86-71, allowing Wright -Hennepin Electric to bury lines on Medina Rd. to serve 1110 Medina Rd. Motion declared carried Wright -Hennepin Electric Moved by Scherer, seconded by Reiser to adopt Resolution 86-72, allowing Wright -Hennepin Electric to bury lines to serve 3075 Tamarack Dr. Motion declared carried Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. Moved by Scherer, seconded by Reiser to adopt Resolution 86-73 allowing Northwestern bell Telephone Co. to bury lines on Pheasant Ridge Rd. and Hunter Dr. Motion declared carried Kilkenny Ln./Hamel Rd. Improvements The following bids were received at 10:00 A.M., September 16th for the Kilkenny Ln./Hamel Rd. improvement and storm sewer project: C.S. McCrossan, $111,596.25; B and D Underground, $126,911.80; Preferred Paving, $128,88L Burschville Construction, $129,448.40. Glenn Cook reported that the Hamel Rd. project would consist of laying drain tile, filling the ditch and constructing a 6 ft. wide shoulder. Council discussed the fact that the bids were 13% higher than the engineers estimate and whether or not the project should be ordered now or delayed until 1987. JoEllen Hurr stated that John Day was waiting for the work to be done so that he could restore his parking lots on Hamel Rd. Robert Mitchell suggested that the property owners might not object to the assessments after the project is constructed and the area improved. Moved by Scherer, seconded by Mitchell to adopt Resolution 86-74 awarding bid for the Kilkenny Ln./Hamel Rd. improvement project to C.S. McCrossan for $111,596.25. ___2211_apclared carried 9. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Thomas Ogland, Hollybush Hills, Final Subdivision Approval Moved by Reiser, seconded by Mitchell to adopt Resolution 86-75, approval to Hollybush Hills Subdivision. Motion declared carried 1 Leonard Schlosser, Final JoEllen Hurr stated that been filed. qtt le gts, granting final subdivision Subdivision Approval no action would be required as the Les Pendens release Tally Ho Farms, Lot Line Rearrangement JoEllen Hurr stated that the Groves Property Co. would be Tally Ho Farms to combine Lots 2, 14 and 15 and subdivide Buckskin Dr. She stated that the location of the barn on documented with a variance approved for the barn. had not rearranging the lot lines of into 2 lots, with frontage on the propprty would need to be Minnegasco Moved by Scherer, seconded by Heideman to adopt Resolution 86-29. allowing Minnegasco to bury gas lines at Pinto Dr. and Tower Dr. Motion declared carried Wright -Hennepin Electric Moved by Scherer, seconded by Heideman to adopt Resolution 86-30, allowing Wright -Hennepin Electric to bury lines on private road serving the Medina Creekside subdivision, provided that they tunnel under Willow Dr. Motion declared carried Mohawk Dr./Medina Rd. Glenn Cook presented a plan to upgrade the intersection f Medina Rd. and Mohawk Dr. to accomodate the road that is planned for the Tom Ogland subdivision. He explained that Oglands would do the grading, if the city would do the graveling, which would cost about $15,000. He stated that the area of alignment is owned by several different people and would need to be obtained from them. He stated that the grading would cost approximately $5000. JoEllen Hurr stated that she would like to know if Council was interested in participating in the project before they proceed further with the plans. William Reiser stated that the City had a lot of problem roads that needed to be taken care of before spending money on this project. Moved by Heideman, seconded by Scherer to table the matter until the Planning Commission has submitted its recommendations on the subdivision. Motion declared carried 4 14 /1 5 g-to 6. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Leonard Greene, Conditional Use Permit for Kennel JoEllen Hurr reviewed memo and Planning Commission recommendations regarding the application of Leonard and Carole Greene to construct a house and adjoining kennel at 2800 Hunter Dr. She stated that the house would be located 150 ft. from property lines and Council discussed the list of Planning Commission recommendations. Leonard Greene read a memo explaining their plans and addressing the concerns of the Plann- ing Commission. He asked that that not be limited to the breed of dog nor the sex of A ogs. Thomas Anderson stated that the Council needs to consider subsequent owners of the property. JoEllen Hurr stated that unless a new owner kept Schnauzer's they would need to apply to the City for a Conditional Use Permit. Phil Zietlow, Planning Commission member, stated that they had addressed the number of dogs of either sex because there might be a problem is the numbers were not specified. Anne Heideman stated that the Nelson permit did not specify the breed and allowed 8 female and 7 male dogs. Maxwell , Orono resident explained that he has a kennel license in Orono for 20 years, with no complaints; they do not limit the number of dogs and that the dogs are raised for show, not profit. Phil Zietlow stated that the Nelsons do not have close neighbors, who might be bothered by noise, that is why the breed of dog was specified in the Greene conditions. Moved by Mitchell, seconded by Reiser to authorize preparation of a resolutionapproving the Leonard and Carole Greene Conditional Use Permit to operate a kennel at 2800 Hunter Dr. with Planning Commission recommendations except that 15 dogs of either sex will be allowed. Motion declared carried Dr. Greene asked if they would need to come to Council every time that they wished to keep a different breed of dog on the premises. JoEllen Hurr stated that she could handle that request on an administrative basis. Jim Lutz, Lutz Elm Creek Addition JoEllen Hurr reviewed conditions to be included in the development contract for Lutz Elm Creek Addition. She stated that the Park Dedication fee would be $6800; security to be posted for street, sewer and water construction, would be $391,335.15; Red Fox Dr. would be changed to Elm Creek Dr. She also stated that Mr. Lutz had asked if the security amount could be reduced as work progresses; that the city agree to plow the snow prior to accept- ance of the streets and that the number of building permits that would be issued would not 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN I, the undersigned publisher or editor of the Lakeshore Weekly News, swear that said the newspaper has its office of issue at 18178 Minnetonka Blvd, in the City of Wayzata, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is a third class free distribution newspaper with a combined circulation of 25,000. I further state an oath that the printed Legal Notice hereto attached as a part hereof was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed therein in the English language one a week for 1 -t -1-li;ham on the 2altw day of MA ,19.111 a last appeared on the Z. day of �'�aY 1917. The following is a copy of the lower case alphabet which is acknowledged to have been the size and kind or type used in the publication of said notice. Publish` or Editor) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3C�('4iay of N1^ V , 19 _ yiotar, Public AMY L CICCHESE NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2000 t.wirilAwe-. CITY OF MEDINA PUBLIC NC)TICE - ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.296 The City Council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. 2%. The ordinance codifies changes in the state law regarding individual sewage treatment systemS. The innovative (mound) systems -has been eliminated. Both trench and mound systems are now classified under state law as standard systems The amendment brings the city's ordinance into compliance with this provision. The amendment also provides that a minimum of five con- tiguous acres of acceptable soil is necessary for installation of a standard sewage treatment system Beginning on July 'L 1999, nn renra turq city-. Existing two acre lots as of that date willbe "grand - fathered" under the amended ordinance' Additional changes will be made in the city's Individual Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems ordinance in the future for the purposes of consistency with state law and this ordinance amendment. The full text of Ordinance No. 296 is available at Medina city hall during regular business hours Adopted May 20,1997 By Order of the Medina City Council Paul Robinson City Clerk Published in the Lakeshore Weekly News this 29th day of May,1997. 10/15/2016 Gmail - Fly: Olkon rarianoe M Gmail FW: Olkon variance 2 messages MIS <5pu5bl5ic@usa.net> Reply -To: 5pu5bl5ic@usa.net To: Ellis Olkon <ellisolkon@gmail.com> Dear Ellis, We are not able to attend tonight's hearing but we did send this note. Regards to you and Nancy. Judy and Chris Ellis Olkon <ellisolkon@gmail.com> Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:23 PM From: MIS [mailto:5pu5b15ic@usa.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 3:20 PM To: Scott Johnson (Scott.Johnson@ci.medina.mn.us) <Scott.Johnson@ci.medina.mn.us> Subject: Olkon variance Dear Scott, Because we are unable to attend the hearing tonight, we would appreciate your providing this note to the City of Medina Planning Commission for tonight's hearing on item #2 "Ellis and Nancy Olkon". The Olkons are our southern neighbor whose northern boundary is completely contiguous with our southem boundary. We have known the Olkons since 2007 when we became Medina residents and their neighbor. We do not pretend to understand the issues involved in granting or denying the Olkons' request for a variance, but we do understand that the City of Medina is involved in an intensive and extensive review and adoption of a New Comprehensive Plan that will affect the future of Medina for years to come. As residents, we rely on the Planning Commission and City Council to make decisions in the best interests of the city as a whole and of its constituents. Thus we ask you to please extend every courtesy in reviewing the Olkons' request, particularly considering their extreme personal circumstances. If there is a stone to lift, please lift it to see if there is any relief that can be granted to them and still stay within the borders of the Commission's and Council's citywide responsibilities. Thank you for your consideration. Judy and Chris Mallett 2492 Willow Drive, Medina MN 55340 ellisolkon@gmail.com <ellisolkon@gmail.c om> Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:09 PM To: MIS <5pu5b15ic@usa.net> Ellis and Nancy Olkon 2526 Willow Dhive North + Medina, MN 553400 Home: 763-475-2526 • Cell: 612-222-5055 E-Mail: ellisolkon@gmail.com Date: August 8, 2016 City of Medina Planning Commission 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55430 Dear Planning Commission: We are writing to request that the City of Medina Planning Commission recommend variances from current city ordinances to allow us to subdivide our 21.8-acre property (2362 Willow Drive North) in half and grant a preliminary plat. Such action is fundamentally fair, follows through on promises the City of Medina made to us in 1986-1987, and is in keeping with the "undue hardship provision" in Section 820.59, Subd. 1 "Standards for Variances". We explain each of these reasons in more detail below after providing some background on the property in question. We have owned our home since May of 1985. In 1986, our neighbor to the east, Thomas Ogdahl, told us that he had been in negotiations with the City of Medina to subdivide his approximately 50 acres of land to build seven to eight homes of about 7 acres each. The City Council, then, told Ogdahl that it would allow him to subdivide the land only if the driveway connected the housing development to Willow Drive South. For that to happen, we agreed to give Ogdahl an easement on about three quarters of an acre of our land to build the driveway. We were very reluctant to do so at first, not seeing how this would benefit either the City of Medina or us. After all, we had moved to Medina in 1985 partly for its rural character, and this developmentt to our immediate east would be a departure from that. But Mayor Tom Anderson and several members of the City Council persuaded us otherwise 1) arguing that that the housing development (now, Hollybush) would bring substantial tax revenues into the City and 2) promising that if Hollybush was built, we would in turn be able to subdivide our 21.8 acres of land in half on a newly constructed driveway "when we got old and grey". For these reasons, we agreed to deed this easement without any monetary consideration. Yet, the City of Medina and Ogdahls have both been enriched by millions of dollars as a result of this easement. In 2008, twelve years later after we granted the easement, we retained Gronberg Surveyors to conduct a survey in anticipation of going forward with a plat subdivision as promised. It was then that we discovered that, in 1999, a different City Council enacted Code 826.25, requiring 5-acres of contiguous soil acceptable to the City of Medina. Unfortunately, we never received notice of the proposed code as required by law. The contiguous soil code should no longer be the applicable standard. After considerable litigation, the Planning Commission and Medina City Council have granted both the Stonegate and Buehler developments, a variance from the 5-acre requirement. In 2015, Stonegate was granted a variance from Code 826.25 and allowed to build 41 homes on about 170 acres of land. In 2015, the Buehler was granted a variance on 3.70 acre of land. Therefore, for reasons of fundamental fairness, we should receive the same variances that were granted to both Stonegate and Buehler. We also think that our case qualifies for the "undue hardship provision" in Subd. 1 Standards for Variances from Section 820.59. The hardship provision stems from Nancy's illness, and continued care. In 2012, after finishing a last round of chemotherapy for a reoccurrence of lymphoma, Nancy was bitten by a mosquito and infected with West Nile Virus while gardening in our backyard. The Virus caused her brain to swell, she was admitted into the intensive care unit, went into a coma for 2 months, and hospitalized for six months more.. When Nancy came home in March of 2013, she was wheelchair bound. We have had to fit our house to make it handicap accessible, and spent $500,000 on PCA care not covered by insurance. For the last two years, we have been trying to sell our house so that we can continue to afford the care Nancy needs to live in dignity. Subdividing the property would allow us to sell our house, expedite our move, and continue to provide Nancy the care she needs. During this difficult period, several City Council members generously attempted to help us get the variance to subdivide our land, and counseled us to be patient while the Planning Commission and City Council considered the case of Stonegate. We have remained patient, but for reasons of fundamental fairness, for the sake of the integrity of the City Council and its prior assurances to us, and to allow us to continue to provide Nancy with the care she needs, we ask that the City of Medina grant the variance from Code 826.25 - as has already been granted to Stonegate and Buehler - and subdivide our property in half and grant a preliminary plat for purposes of sale. Also in keeping with Section 820.59 Subd. 1(d). Standards for Variances, "The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood in which the parcel of land is located." The attached soil testing concluded that two areas are shown on both east and west parcels to support a 5 bedroom homee which allows more than enough space for a primary and secondary drain field. Dividing our land in half would neither alter the rural character nor affect the natural beauty of the area - all reasons for why we moved to the City of Medina, why we have loved to live here, and would remain if not for Nancy's condition. Thank you for taking the time to consider our case. Sincerely, Ellis and Nancy Olkonn 2362 Willow Drive North Medina, MN 2 THOMAS W. WEXLER ATTORNEY AT LAW 7520 Cahill Road #119 Edina, MN 55439 Office: 952-925-2097 Email: wexleradr@aol.com January 10, 2017 Medina City Planning Commission Attn: Dusty Finke By email to Dusty.Finke@,ci.medina.mn.us RE: Ellis and Nancy Olkon preliminary plat application 2362 Willow Drive _ public hearing Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I have been retained by the Olkons to assist them through this process. I reviewed the staff report dated January 3, 2017, related to the °ikon's application. In that connection I have met with Jennifer Haskamp and reviewed some of the Medina city regulations, county, state and federal regulations and have consulted with other experts related to the issues here involved You should have Ms. Haskamp's letter which she submitted today which addresses lot size issues, access issues, floodplain elevation concerns, lot area (especially related to septic concerns), park dedication fees and setback requirements. I may not be able to attend the meeting tonight, but in any event I would like to add the following to her comments. LOT WIDTH: The staff report makes a number of references alleging insufficient lot width of lot # 1 (250 feet along the very southern edge instead of 300 feet). Ms. Haskamp points out why she believes the staff report is in error. But even if the very southern edge of lot 41 is 250 feet, there is no mention in the staff report of how the lot width of this irregularly shaped lot could reasonably impact public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and general welfare of Medina. SUITABLE SOIL FOR THE SEPTIC SYSTEM: Ms. Haskamp's letter addresses this and cites the city's own expert, Mr.Loren Kohnen, for the proposition that the new site meets all the requirements of the MPCA rule s 7080,7081, and 7082. I have attached a copy of his written report dated August 10, 2016. There should be no dispute that the proposed lot has sufficient suitable soil for a standard septic system. I have researched county, state, and federal regulations and have consulted other experts and I have found no authority, none, for the reasonableness of the Medina requirement of 5 contiguous acres of suitable soil. I expect that Medina has many residential lots whose total area is not even 5 acres, but still have safe effective septic systems. With all due respect, this Medina requirement is unreasonable and interferes with reasonable use and enjoyment of property. SETBACKS: Ms. Haskamp also addressed this issue. I would add that the Oikons would be amenable to remove the building(s) that are close to the lot line. But I would also like to point out that the location of these buildings on this unique lot are not close to a road or to underground utility lines or otherwise impose any likely impediment to public health, safety or general welfare. My request on behalf of the Olkon's is that the planning commission give preliminary approval to the Olkon application, perhaps subject to the few remaining concerns about how access would be arranged and similar concerns that are well solvable. Thank yo omas W. xler METRO NEST INSPECTION SERVICES, INC. Loren Kohnen, Pres. August 10, 2016 TO: Debra Peterson FROM: Loren Kohnen RE Preliminary Plat Lot Split 2363 Dillow Drive N. (763) 479-1 720 FAX (763) 479-3090 Mtrowst76@aol.corn 1) I have reviewed the septic design provided for what would be a new lot. 2) The septic design meets all the requirements of M.P.C_A. Rules, 7080, 7081, 7082. 3) Both sites must be fenced and protected before any construction or site work is started, and remains in place. 4) A new design for a mound style system which will match the requirement for the proposed home to be built, will be required_ LK A jg Sox 248, Loretto, Minnesota 55357 SHCcnSWAN SONgplH,ASannK gMP onsultiing January 9, 2017 Members of the Planning Commission City of Medina, MN Transmitted via Email through Dusty.Finke@ci.medina.mn.us RE: Ellis and Nancy Olkon — Preliminary Plat — 2362 Willow Drive — Public Hearing Dear Members of the Planning Commission, In November of 2016 Mr. and Mrs. Olkon contacted me regarding their request for a variance and minor subdivision (preliminary plat) of their property at 2362 Willow Drive. While I was not retained during the variance review process I have reviewed their application materials, including the Preliminary Plat request which is before the Planning Commission on January 10, 2017. Unfortunately I am unable to attend the public hearing, so I submit to you on their behalf the following letter. Please include this correspondence as part of the official public hearing record. We are in receipt of Mr. Finke's staff report, and would like to respond and comment on a few items detailed within his report. • Lot Width & Depth (Lot 1): Mr. Finke states that Lot 1 does not meet the City's Standard for Lot Width. However, in determining Lot Width, the Lot Line, Front must first be identified. The City's ordinance defines the Lot Line, Front as, "The line connecting the Side Lot Line of a Lot measured along the boundary of the Right -of -Way designated by the City Council to serve the Lot." The subject parcel is accessed from Willow Drive, which makes Willow Drive the Front, where the Lot Width, is described in the ordinance as, "(3) For all other lots, lot width is the maximum horizontal distance between the side lot lines measured at the front building setback line." Per the preliminary plat, the Lot Width is approximately 1,150-feet which meets the city's lot width standard. Given this lot orientation, and the definition in the City's Code, the lot depth is approximately 410-feet, which also exceeds the city's lot standards. We believe that the code was inaccurately applied, and that both Lot 1 and Lot 2 meet the City's Lot Width and Depth standards in the rural residential zoning district. • Access to Lot 2: Mr. Finke states that access to Lot 2 was not adequately addressed. Access to Lot 2 could be accommodated in one of two ways — 1) by a shared driveway easement across Lot 1 HCSWANSON H,ASKANIP Scnsulling planning (memorialized through private easement agreement, or other acceptable tool by the city) or 2) by gaining access from Hollybush Road. While the Olkons do not have control over being allowed to access Lot 2 from Hollybush Road, they can provide and grant access across Lot 1 which they currently own. Therefore, there is arn-ss available, and it is within their power to grant it. We would suggest this is a non -issue. • Floodplain Elevation: We reached out to the MCWD, and they indicated the following with respect to the Floodplain, "MCWD's engineers are able to model the BFE for properties identified to be within FEMA's flood zones...They determined that the modeled 10-day, 100-year BFE for 2362 Willow Drive is 979.38 FASL. This was derived through the TP-40 model. The Atlas-14 model, which provides the 24-hour, 100-year BFE came back with an unknown BFE. Additional modeling would be needed to determine this BFE, but the NFIP only uses TP-40, so this modeled BFE may be sufficient." Based on the elevation described, the Floodplain would extend north beyond the delineated wetland area on Lot 2 by an average of approximately 50-feet, and the Floodplain Elevation is within the delineated wetland boundary on Lot 1. This does not impact, nor infringe upon, the area which was designated as buildable and/or suitable for a septic system on either Lot 1 or Lot 2. • Lot Area: The City's subdivision ordinance defines Lot Area as, "The horizontal plane bounded by the Lot Lines." Per this definition, the Lot Area of Lot 1 is 10.49 Acres, and Lot 2 is 10.49 Acres. The ordinance stipulates further that lots within the rural service area "must... comply with the minimum lot area requirements for contiguous soils as defined in this ordinance, and specifically in section 820.29 subd.4(a) and subd. 5. Minimum lot area standards in rural residential areas include a requirement that the lot contains a primary and secondary site for a standard on -site sewage disposal system." 820.29 subd. 4(a) contains a table titled, "Soils ACCEPTABLE for Septic Systems" which suggests that the 5-acre contiguous suitable soils are correlated to the safe/acceptable functioning of a septic system. However, it is untrue that 5-acres of contiguous suitable soils is needed to support an individual septic system. In fact, the generally accepted industry standard for a single-family residential lot needs approximately 1.0 acre of suitable soils for a safe, functioning septic system. This is evidenced further by Loren Kohnen, the city's consultant, who indicates that, "The septic design meets all the requirements of the MP.CA. Rules 7080, 7081, 7082"regarding the information submitted by the Olkon's experts for Lots 1 and 2. • Park Dedication Fees: We understand that the staff intends to present this Preliminary Plat request to the City's Park Commission on January 18`h. We would respectfully request that the City Staff revisit the analysis conducted regarding fee -in -lieu contained within the staff report. It appears from the City Engineer's memo that the reason staff is requesting additional ROW on Willow Drive is so that the Trail on the City's Trail Plan could be constructed. If the subdivision were to move forward, this additional ROW for the Trail should be given a credit as Land Dedication and considered within the City's park dedication calculations, rather than assuming a full fee -in -lieu. HCSWANSON H,ASKANIP Sc[7nsulling planning Setbacks (Accessory Buildings): The proposed Lot Line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 would result in a couple of the accessory structures being located within the allowable setbacks. There are multiple ways in which this could be addressed including mandatory removal of the structure before any building permits were issued for the Lot in question. While this may create a non -conforming situation initially, there are ways in which this could be addressed without the need for a variance (1 have provided just one example, but there are other ways this issue could be addressed). In conclusion, we respectfully disagree with the City Staff s findings that the preliminary plat does not meet the intent of the City's subdivision and zoning ordinance. We believe that the information submitted clearly demonstrates that the proposed preliminary plat would not negatively impact the character, public health, or safety of the community. We believe that the subdivision is consistent with the community's stated goals and objectives, and maintains the City's rural residential density which permits one (1) unit per 10 acres. Further, we have provided technical evidence that both lots are buildable and can support a functioning septic system. If you have any questions regarding the information provided in this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651.321.2012 or jhaskamp@swansonhaskamp.com. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jennifer Haskamp Principal & Owner SHC, LLC 0i7Z-9L OtZ-9L 'ON 80r 55LZ 1 aagwnN asuaoi-i o}osauum 6.1aquoa0 •s >1.roW 9L-SL-L 31V0 TWOS _ •o}osauum j.o awls ay} sMoi ay} Japun JoAan.ans puoi pasuaon Air o WD I }oy} puo 'uolsvuadns aapun JO 'aw paaodaad soM }..iodaJ Jo 'uo1}ooi}loads `void sly . }oy} Appao AgaJay I l b l b-£L-b-Z56 95£SS 'NW `3>IV1 91101 3ANG MOT1IM 1-11110N girt. SZiaNNWId asIS `SHOA.aM nS QNV I `saaaNIDNa DNI,LICISN00 'ONI `saIviaossv QNV DZIRgNoZID ©-)avb' so-vv71jM 9�-/-6 ONIMVNO NO NMOHS '031V301 sommin8 ENNISIX3 9L-9i-9 N011dI2:10S30 _ 31V0 \ F'66 2Z-9 l I.- l Z •03S 30 800 3N ,sz ,gg000 s 09 -A 0 �� /�\ \\996' // - — \ \ -996 / \ -1796�7teV,Ld30 V-1U1� 096 • • I � ••""b3d 1N3W3St/3 Ot/021 2Z-eLL-LZ -9L6— `\3-18V1d30Q,6' lON OV \\--9L6- V Erl C� 2" / �/� // i 4" \3NI H�2301� 318b1d300d ION V O TI S-1I0S 3•18bid300V snonaiNo3 •3d +5s' . 6 / -1bL6- \ 1 l •ani.Io uoi}oaS j.o saaoo +86 pZ - spoo.a 6ulpnloxa a6oa.aoo Io}o} a}ou.aixo.addV •ADAn j.o }ysia pooa apnloui }ou op soa.lo adAl Ilos •wn}op pawnsso uo uodn pasoq a.ao uMoys s6ui.aoa8 sdow Aluno0 aad `au!' Jno}uoo 6u1}sixa sa}ouap • Ll6 MOIHM j.o 41.a91.soa puo `-,Z •oN pooy Aluno0 J.o AI.aay}aou 6upq .aapono }spaypoN ay} jo .aapono }soay}.aoN ay} to pod }oyl \\ DNI.1 IG- 7r�`\� SlOSL318b'ld 0b' l Q a&Od O d\ ' SjlOn011N00 • +l 1.7 v \ 0d +6-•Ok \ / I��dld3'O�J� ION / Z86 '03 b7r �N \ ":\ \ \ \ \\ ` \ \\� \ \ \ �\ \ \� \\\ \ �31�1d330`� \ \ — \ S3210b -- 5 '� \ \\ 1 o�ol_ \\ , , ONI1S31 dS _83d \ $3301-1--1Sa I --OIld3S \ / _ zt- 5-- \ \\ \� ot� Waal( x s mot) \\ - // aii£OL �Z-9t l Z\ �3S/ _tAl 3N -V/ ' ANb `N100 S30IA8 S ' 1VIN3WN081AN3 D eHiorN d. �iS0Nb�13M 031d3 ma 30 3OI 020 23-9 T T -Ta NOLLDHS f7/ T aNT HILL NI 1\10}1r10 S3SIW3�Id 30 NOI1d1�10S30 1d03-1 sHr SWANSON HASKAMP consulting planning January 16, 2017 Honorable Mayor and City Councilors City oflviet ina, iviN Transmitted via Email through Dusty.Finkeoci.medina.mn.us RE: Ellis and Nancy Olkon - Preliminary Plat — 2362 Willow Drive Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilors, On January 10, 2017, the Planning Commission considered an application for preliminary plat made by Mr. and Mrs. Olkon to subdivide their property located at 2362 Willow Drive. I, on behalf of the Olkons, submitted a letter responding to some of the issues/findings made by Mr. Finke in his staff report dated January 3, 2017, and I requested that the letter be submitted into the record as part of public testimony. While I was unable to attend the meeting on January 10a' it is my understanding that Mr. Finke made a presentation on behalf of the staff in which he highlighted some of the issues identified within his report. In response to the Planning Commission and Staffs report, the Olkons have asked me to provide this follow- up letter as an addendum to SHC's previously submitted letter dated January 10, 2017. • Lot Width & Depth (Lot 1): There remains some concern regarding having the appropriate frontage/lot width on proposed Lotl. The existing frontage on CR 24 is approximately 698-feet. The City's zoning ordinance requires each lot to have a minimum of 300-feet of frontage. As proposed, Lot 1 would have approximately 250-feet of frontage and Lot 2 has approximately 395- feet. It would be very simple, and consistent with the City's past practices, to simply require that the proposed lot line shift slightly to the east to ensure 300-feet of frontage on Lot 1 prior to approving the final plat. The Olkons are willing to shift the proposed lot line to the east by approximately 50-feet at the frontage to ensure each lot meets the city's requirement. This could be a simple condition of granting the preliminary plat. • Setbacks (Accessory Building): The proposed Lot Line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 would result in the existing accessory building on Lot 1 to encroach within the 50-foot setback. There are a few solutions, which we have identified below: 1. The entire lot line could be shifted east approximately 50-feet resulting in potential compliance of all accessory buildings. This would reduce the overall size of Lot 2; however, SW' SWANSON HASKAMP consulting planning does not impact the `buildable' area of the lot and would still exceed the five -acre minimum lot size. 2. The City Council could simply make it a condition of preliminary plat approval that the accessory building located in the setback must be removed prior to any new building permit being issued on either Lot 1 or Lot 2. 3. Finally, if the City Council is still concerned about the accessory building in question, a condition could be stated that the accessory building must be removed within a specified amount of time of final plat being granted. The Olkons are willing to work with the City Council on any of these options to ensure that all structures on the created lots comply with the City's ordinances. Thank you for your continued consideration. Sincerely, 1 nnifer Haskamp Principal & Owner SHC, LLC MEMORANDUM Agenda Item # 8C TO: Medina City Council FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: January 11, 2017 DATE OF MEETING: January 17, 2017 SUBJECT: Youth Park Commission Members — Ordinance Amendment In December, the City received an application for the Park Commission from a student under the age of 18, but the current ordinance does not address youth membership. Staff has done some research and found that many metro cities allow for up to two youth members on various volunteer commissions. It is recommended that the youth member be a non- voting member, but can still contribute to the conversation. By making them a non -voting member, they do not affect quorum if they miss meetings for school activities, etc. City Council Liaison to the Park Commission Lorie Cousineau, Park Commission Chair Steve Lee and I are recommending the attached ordinance amendment to allow for non -voting youth members to the Medina Park Commission. CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 525 OF THE MEDINA CITY CODE REGARDING CITY PARK COMMISSION The city council of the city of Medina ordains as follows: SECTION I: Medina city code section 525 is amended by adding the double underlined material and deleting the stricken material as follows: Section 525.01. Establishment and Composition. Subd. 1. A park commission of seven members is established. Members of the park commission shall be appointed by majority vote of the city council and may be removed for any reason by a vote of two-thirds of the full city council. Members of the park commission shall be residents of Medina who have lived in Medina for at least one year immediately preceding appointment. Subd. 2. The city council may also appoint up to two youth members to the park commission. Youth members shall be less than 18 years of age at the time of their appointment. Youth members shall be non -voting members and their presence or absence at a meeting shall not be counted in determining the existence of a quorum of the commission. Section 525.03. Term. Subd. 1. Members of the park commission shall serve staggered terms of three years. Terms shall begin January 1. No person shall serve more than nine consecutive years on the park commission. For purposes of this ordinance, consecutive years shall not be considered prior to January 1, 2005. Any person who has served on the park commission for nine consecutive years may be appointed again after an interruption in service of at least one year. Subd. 2. Youth members of the park commission shall serve a term of one year from the date of appointment and may be appointed for a second term of one year regardless of their age at the time of reappointment. Section 525.05. Duties. The park commission shall provide advice and recommendations to the city council and planning commission on matters of development and use of parks and recreational facilities, recreation programs, preservation of natural resources, and promotion of environmental awareness. The duties of the park commission may include, but are not limited to the following activities: 1 493138v2 ME230-1A Subd. 1. Advising the city council and planning commission regarding park dedication requirements, including land dedication or cash in lieu payments; Subd. 2. Advising the city council regarding the use of special contributions and expenditure of monies from the park dedication fund and municipal parks fund; Subd. 3. Studying special issues requested by the city council or recommending the study of issues relating to the development and use of parks; Subd. 4. Advising on the application for county, state and federal grant programs consistent with park commission and city council policies; Subd. 5. Undertaking such other duties as the city council may request; and Subd. 6. Advising the city council on updates and changes to the comprehensive plan as it relates to parks, trails and recreational activities. Subd. 5. Advising the city council on updates and changes to the comprehensive plan as it relates to parks, trails and recreational activities; and Subd. 6. Undertaking such other duties as the city council may request. Section 525.07. Council Action. The recommendations of the park commission shall be advisory to the city council. The city council may adopt, modify or reject the recommendations of the park commission by vote of a simple majority of those present. The city council shall not be required to take any action with regard to a recommendation of the park commission. Section 525.09. Organization. The park commission shall: Subd. 1. Elect from its members a chair and a vice chair, each of whom shall serve for a period of one year; Subd. 2. Appoint a secretary from its membership who shall perform the clerical duties on behalf of the park commission and maintain meeting minutes; and Subd. 3. Adopt such bylaws as shall be necessary or desirable to conduct its business but which may not be in conflict with any ordinance or statute. Bylaws shall be adopted by a majority vote of the full park commission. Section 525.11 Staff Liaison. The city administrator shall designate a staff liaison to the park commission. The liaison shall prepare reports and information for the park commission, attend its meetings and participate in hearings and discussions held by the park commission but shall not vote on any item before the commission. The liaison shall report to the city administrator and city council on the activities and recommendations of the park commission. 2 493138v2 ME230-1A Section 525.13. Meetings. All meetings of the park commission shall be open to the public and shall be governed by the Minnesota open meeting law. The park commission shall hold its meetings at such fixed date, time and place as it from time to time shall determine. The minutes of all meetings shall be recorded and a copy transmitted to the city council. SECTION II. The ordinance shall be effective upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the city council of the city of Medina this day of , 2017. Bob Mitchell, Mayor ATTEST: Jodi M. Gallup, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News the day of , 2017. 3 493138v2 ME230-1A MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Mitchell and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, City Planner; through City Administrator Scott Johnson DATE: January 12, 2017 SUBJ: Planning Department Updates — January 17, 2017 City Council Meeting Land Use Application Review A) Olkon Variance and Preliminary Plat — 2362 Willow Drive — Ellis and Nancy Olkon have requested a variance from the minimum suitable soils requirements to subdivide their 20 acre property into two lots. The Planning Commission reviewed the variance request at the September 13 meeting and unanimously recommended denial. The City Council adopted a resolution denying the variance on December 20. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on the plat at the January 10 meeting and recommended denial. The application is scheduled to be presented to the Council on January 17. B) Woodridge Church Site Plan Review — 1500 County Road 24 — Woodridge Church has requested a Comp Plan amendment, rezoning, lot combination, conditional use permit amendment, site plan review, and interim use permit for construction of a 15,085 square foot addition to the north side of the existing building. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the lot combination, CUP interim use permit and Site Plan at their Monday, December 19, 2016 meeting, on the Comp Plan Amendment and rezoning on January 10. The Commission unanimously recommended approval of all of the applications. The application is scheduled to be presented to the Council on January 17. C) Marx CD-PUD Concept Plan — 2700 and 2900 Parkview Drive — Wally and Bridget Marx have requested review of a concept plan for a 61ot conservation design subdivision on approximately 90 acres. The applicant proposes 51.58 acres (10 buildable acres) of conservation. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the request at their January 10 meeting and provided comments. The application is scheduled to be presented to the Council on February 7. D) Lunski Senior Community Concept Plan — North of Highway 55, East of Willow Drive (PID 03-118-23-32-0007) — Lunski, Inc. has requested review of a Concept Plan for development of an approximately 126 unit senior living community to include independent and assisted living units. The applicant is considering changes to their plan and has requested a delay in review. The Planning Commission is tentatively scheduled to hold a public hearing on the request at their February 13 meeting. E) Three Rivers Park/We Can Ride CUP — 4301 County Road 24 — Three Rivers Park District and We Can Ride have requested a conditional use permit amendment to allow We Can Ride, a nonprofit that provides programming to individuals with disabilities or special needs, to occupy the stable previously utilized by Three Rivers Park mounted patrol. The Planning Commission is tentatively scheduled to hold a public hearing on the request at their February 13 meeting. F) AutoMotorPlex, Hamel Brewery, St. Peter and Paul Cemetery — The City Council has adopted resolutions approving these projects, and staff is assisting the applicants with the conditions of approval in order to complete the projects. G) Woods of Medina, Capital Knoll— These preliminary plats have been approved and staff is awaiting a final plat application Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 January17, 2017 City Council Meeting H) Capital Knoll, Hamel Haven subdivisions — These subdivisions have received fmal approval. Staff is working with the applicants on the conditions of approval before the plats are recorded Other Pro'ects A) Comprehensive Plan — The Planning Commission held the Public Hearing on the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan update at the December 13 meeting. Following the hearing, Commissioners discussed all chapters of the plan and recommended a number of changes. Following discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Plan. Staff presented the Plan for City Council review at the January 3 meeting and intends to present again at the February 7 meeting. B) Long Lake subwatershed Carp Study Grant — On January 6, I attended a meeting related to a proposed Hennepin County Opportunity grant application by Medina, Orono, Long Lake, and Minnehaha Creek to study rough fish in the Long Lake subwatershed. The grant would support the study of the fish in order to determine management strategies and potential water quality improvements. The cost of the study is $160,000, with the grant to cover $100,000. Staff requested additional details on the expected cost of future management in order to determine if additional investment in the study would be appropriate. This information will be presented to the Council when available. C) Wayzata Schools Growth Task Force — On January 12, 2017, I will be presenting at a Growth Task Force committee meeting related to anticipated growth within the City of Medina. Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 January17, 2017 City Council Meeting MEDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 600 Clydesdale Trail Medina, MN 55340.9790 p: 763.473-9209 f: 763.473-8858 non -emergency: 763-525-6210 MEMORANDUM Emergency 9.1_1 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayor Robert Mitchell and City Council Edgar J. Belland, Director of Public Safety, Through City Administrator Scott Johnson January 12, 2017 Department Updates Welcome to 2017 The weather continues to be cold and downright nasty. 2017 started out very busy for the police department. We have had bad weather which led to several accidents and cars in the ditch. The Medina Ballroom had a capacity crowd for New Year's Eve. We had two arrested for assault at their concert. We had a house that was rented for a New Year's Eve party that sustained major damage; the attendees were involved in suspected drug trafficking and gun activity. We had a truck stolen out of Loretto, a couple of underage drinking cases and two domestics. Hopefully, this activity will slow as the year goes on. Staffing Officer Swalchick continues in his FTO program. Officer Boecker has started in his new role as our in-house investigator. We are hopeful that we will be at full staff sometime in March. In the meantime, Sergeant Nelson is ensuring that the patrol shifts are covered. We will be starting on 2017 required training. We have the mandatory training built into our 2017 schedule. Year End Reports We have started to close out the reports for 2016. We have until the first week in February to finalize our report numbers to the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Patrol by Sergeant Jason Nelson Patrol Activities For the dates of December 13, 2016, to January 11, 2017, our officers issued 73 citations and 188 warnings for various traffic infractions. There were a total of 17 traffic accidents, 19 medicals, 15 alarms and two DWIs. On January 7, 2017, numerous officers and reserves attended annual first responder training at the Loretto Fire Department. We were quite busy for a few days around the New Year and being shorthanded didn't help. Officer Swalchick is progressing along in his field training. On December 29, 2016, Officer McKinley responded to a domestic abuse between husband and wife. Officer McKinley subsequently arrested the male that was involved. On December 30, 2016, Officer McKinley took a counterfeit bill report at Jimmy's Pizza. They reported that a driver had taken (2) counterfeit $20 bills for a delivery. Case was forwarded to Investigations. On December 31, 2016, Officer McKinley took a theft of diesel fuel report. Farmer indicates that someone had cut the padlock from his fuel tank and stole 100 gallons of diesel fuel. Loss was approximately $250. Case forwarded to Investigations. On December 31, 2016, Officers Gregory and Swalchick responded to the Medina Entertainment Center for an assault report. A male and female were subsequently arrested for 5t Degree Assault on the Medina Entertainment staff. On January 1, 2017, Officers Gregory and Swalchick responded to Casey's Gas Station for a taxi no pay. Six females had been picked up from a hotel in Minneapolis and requested to go to an address in Medina. When they got to Casey's, they said that was far enough and then fled from the taxi. Officers were able to locate all parties involved and they were issued citations for theft and underage consumptions. On January 1, 2017, Officer Jessen was dispatched to a residence for damage to property report. Homeowners indicate that they rent out their residence through AirBNB for $299/night. They had been doing this off and on for the past six months and had never had any issues. The house was found in bad shape and estimates to repair damages were in excess of 20K. This residence was also related to the taxi no pay call. Corcoran Police Department also arrested a male for DWI and possession of a stolen handgun who was trying to find the residence. Case forwarded to Investigations. On January 2, 2017, Officer McGill took a theft report. Victim reports that she parked her vehicle in the Target lot and went shopping. When she came out, she found that someone had stolen her windshield wiper blades. On January 9, 2017, Officer Converse took a forgery report from Farmers State Bank of Hamel. It was learned that the victim had placed her bills in the mailbox and put the red flag up. A male suspect had "washed" the check and made it out to himself for $1611.06. The original check had been made out for $611.06. Case forwarded to Investigations. Investigations by Investigator Kevin Boecker Motor vehicle that was stolen from Loretto on December 17, 2016, was recovered in St. Paul on January 4th. A male and female were arrested that were found inside the vehicle. The investigation is continuing as to who initially stole the vehicle. On January 3, 2017, took a walk-in identity theft report. Homeowner in the 1300 block of Hunter Drive found someone had printed fraudulent checks from his checking account and then cashed one and attempted to cash a second. It is believed that a suspect obtained the homeowner's checking information by intercepting a check that was placed in outgoing mail of the homeowner's mailbox. Two suspects have been identified from the cashing/attempted cashing and investigation is continuing. Investigated a counterfeit bill that was passed to a local business. Contact was made with the person who passed the bill and it is believed that the person had no knowledge that the bill was counterfeit. The case was closed due to lack of evidence. A threat to a Hennepin County Public Works worker from a Hennepin County resident was closed after the person receiving the threat declined to pursue any charges. Investigating a check that was intercepted out of outgoing mail from a mailbox in Plymouth, altered by "washing" and then cashed at Farmers State Bank of Hamel. A possible suspect has been identified and investigation is continuing. Currently have 12 open cases that are being investigated. MEMORANDUM TO: City Council, through City Administrator Scott Johnson FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: January 10, 2016 MEETING: January 17, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • The streets are in good shape, but are starting to show movement and roughness to them. This is typical as the frost moves into the subbase. • We have had another ice event along with some small snow events since the last update. • I have ordered in most of our remaining salt contract for the year. I am confident we have enough for the season. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • Bids are out for the water tower rehab project and will be opened this month. • Public works always tries hard to find balance between salt use and being environmentally friendly with our lakes and streams. With all the ice lately we have had to use more than I like to use. • Most all the projects are frozen up for the winter and no longer require erosion control inspections. PARKS/TRAILS • Hamel Legion Park is busier than ever. The ice is good and there is snow on the hill for the kids to use. I think this has been one of the best years I can remember and for sure the most use I have seen. • The trails did require some sand and salt because of all the ice in the past two weeks. This is something until now we have not had to do. MISCELLANEOUS • I took some time off for the passing of my mother last week. I am also going to be on vacation from the 1 lth through the 16th of January. I look forward to a new start to this year when I return. ORDER CHECKS JANUARY 3, 2017 - JANUARY 17, 2017 045369 DOMINO, CHARMANE $34.82 045370 GARAGE LIFESTYLE INC $1,000.00 045371 HOGLUND, KATE $500.00 045372 JEFFREY, GLENN & LINDA $5,000.00 045373 MD QUALITY CONSTRUCTION $150.00 045374 NALLAMOTHU,JAYARAM $500.00 045375 RUDRA, SANTANU $250.00 045376 THEISEN, KEN & NANCY $500.00 045377 HENN COUNTY TREASURER $20.00 045378 HENN COUNTY TREASURER $20.00 045379 HENN COUNTY TREASURER $20.00 045380 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL $779.65 045381 AFO CONSULTANTS $1,230.00 045382 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY $222.00 045383 ALLIED 100,LLC $837.10 045384 ASPEN MILLS INC $388.85 045385 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE $2,121.00 045386 BERGANKDV, LTD $1,200.00 045387 BIFFS INC $247.30 045388 CENTERPOINT ENERGY $3,054.73 045389 CENTURYLINK $223.12 045390 DPC INDUSTRIES INC $2,362.48 045391 DS HUNZ SERVICES INC $221.00 045392 ECM PUBLISHERS INC $617.38 045393 FASTENAL COMPANY $42.13 045394 GOODIN COMPANY $259.98 045395 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $106.65 045396 GRAINGER $119.13 045397 HACH COMPANY $406.13 045398 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I $1,000.00 045399 HAMEL LUMBER INC $291.50 045400 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD $823.08 045401 HENN COUNTY SHERIFF $196.22 045402 HENN COUNTY TAXPAYER SVCS DEPT $36.22 045403 HENN CTY RESIDENT/REAL ESTATE $81.50 045404 HOTSY EQUIPMENT OF MN INC $518.20 045405 KELLY'S WRECKER SERVICE INC $75.00 045406 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $5,448.84 045407 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $579.00 045408 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC $75.49 045409 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $9,840.60 045410 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $300.00 045411 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $127.23 045412 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $1,878.00 045413 OIL AIR PRODUCTS LLC $118.91 045414 CITY OF ORONO $690.96 045415 QUALITY RESOURCE GROUP INC $113.53 045416 RYAN COMPANIES $31,328.16 045417 SAM'S CLUB $119.92 045418 SNOW AND SUN PAINTING $4,311.00 045419 STREICHER'S $696.87 045420 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI $3,807.25 045421 TARGET CORPORATION $50,532.72 045422 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $512.25 045423 TOWMASTER $179.21 045424 ULINE $235.15 045425 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $574.44 045426 BOTTIGER, WENDI $200.00 045427 FULLER, TERRI $150.00 045428 ABDO, EICK & MEYERS LLP $5,300.00 045429 ACE CASH EXPRESS INC $7.10 045430 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN $29,129.03 045431 ELM CREEK WATERSHED $18,362.05 045432 HENN Cr( CHIEFS POLICE ASSN $150.00 045433 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS.TRUST $49,032.00 045434 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE $634.66 045435 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $5,557.82 045436 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $25,399.93 045437 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $26.17 045438 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR $275.00 045439 OFFICE DEPOT $75.98 045440 PIONEER-SARAH CREEK $15,032.56 045441 STREICHER'S $148.98 045442 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL $621.90 Total Checks $287,027.88 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS JANUARY 3, 2017 — JANUARY 17, 2017 003977E PR PERA $14,767.98 003978E PR FED/FICA $17,231.63 003979E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,345.00 003980E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,482.08 003981E SELECT ACCOUNT $17,251.45 003982E CITY OF MEDINA $21.00 003983E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $20.00 003984E SELECT ACCOUNT $253.90 003985E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC $35.79 003986E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC $338.08 003987E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES $62.98 003988E VERIZON WIRELESS $1,241.31 003989E PITNEY BOWES $761.88 003990E CITY OF PLYMOUTH $703.02 003991E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $204.67 003992E PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE BY PHONE $1,000.00 003993E SELECT ACCOUNT $1,999.20 003994E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. $4,753.00 003995E PREMIUM WATERS INC $38.75 Total Electronic Checks $66,511.72 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT JANUARY 11, 2017 507653 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L $1,307.40 507654 ANDERSON, JOHN G $230.87 507655 BARNHART, ERIN A. $2,082.88 507656 BELLAND, EDGAR J $2,570.17 507657 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,828.15 507658 CONVERSE, KEITH A $2,467.98 507659 COUSINEAU, LORIE K. $230.87 507660 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,867.26 507661 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,681.43 507662 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $2,178.54 507663 GALLUP, JODI M $1,705.87 507664 GLEASON, JOHN M. $1,996.50 507665 GREGORY, THOMAS $1,923.66 507666 HALL, DAVID M. $2,099.84 507667 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S $2,466.67 507668 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,350.19 507669 KLAERS, ANNE M $2,154.49 507670 LANE, LINDA $1,479.24 507671 LEUER, GREGORY J. $2,390.14 507672 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M $230.87 507673 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,467.64 507674 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,467.29 507675 MITCHELL, ROBERT G. $327.04 507676 NELSON, JASON $2,076.82 507677 PEDERSON,JEFF $221.92 507678 PETERSON, DEBRA A $1,648.11 507679 REINKING, DEREK M $1,911.15 507680 SCHARF, ANDREW $594.48 507681 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,306.16 507682 SWALCHICK, CRAIG M $1,343.72 507683 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,130.66 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $50,738.01