Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutBox 512 - misc. accounting printouts 8-9-0101 18 Revised 18 17 Revised 4,581,610.06 4,468,880.06 4,451,416.06 $ 4,404,379.84 $ Outlays before this application $ 3,099,972.00 $ 3,809,892.00 5 3,826,347.00 $ 4,404,679.84 $ CO 112,730.00 $ 359,408.61 $ 341,644.61 $ 16,455.00 $ 1,128,324.50 709,920.00 $ Outlays this application Seubert Invoice 145,267.27 $ $ 1,128,024.50 q 01 Construction --less deductions $ CO CO Ca 242,121.28 { q 0 co / E o • co DEQ--Non Federal a en { 2 VI 49 0 0 636,553.00 $ 64 709,920.00 $ vo 5,275,323.97 4,581,610.06 $ 4,564,146 06 $ 4,763,788.45 5 ,347,00 $ 4,954,671.50 5 4,746,324.45 $ \ \• cm Non Federal co 549,991.66 $ Funds Returned to BOR c3 co 0 en OD • N 0 Liquidated Damages 193,919.63 $ car 104,734.29 0 527,523.63 5 appl 10.xIsBOR Accounting2.03 PM819/2001 18 Revised $ 4,858,754.45 co 3 } f O \ _ 1 0 E c 6 ? 2 o & k ± a c B = E 0 a o n o 0 4 1- 10 - 3 3,0 EFT / \ o � m @ a ma u= ow = _ _ 8/9/20011:43 PMappl 10.xIsBOR 270 18 17 Revised 4. 4,581,619.96 4,468,880.06 $ 4,451,116.06 $ 4,404,379.84 $ Outlays before this application $ 3,099,972.00 $ 3,809,892.00 $ 3,826,347.00 $ 4,404,379,84 S 112,730.00 $ 359,408.61 $ YI a 16,455.00 $ 1,128,924.50 $ 709,920,00 $ w Outlays this application 0 4. w Seubert Invoice 0 0 0 1 M1 N 145,267.27 $ 1,127,724.50 an ea 0 N N 0 N .- 0 N B N w w w w w w 0 0 w 49 40 w Construction --less deductions E a U m 7 112,730.00 $ Wausau Payment Due 112,730.00 $ 112,730.00 $ 636,553.00 $ w 16,455.00 $ 1,128,024.50 709,920.00 $ va Amount requested from BOR 5,275,323.97 4,581,610.06 $ 4,563,846.06 $ 4,763,788,45 $ S 3,826,347.00 $ 4,954,371.50 $ 4,746,024.45 $ Non Federal 549,991.66 S 6* Funds Returned to BOR o C, G+ N 0 N N o 2o a a 40 N en N N . N GO N 0 01 ti 0 e 315,000.00 $ w Liquidated Damages AB Costs associated with the 193,919.63 $ Yi w 100,147.1❑ $ 527,523.63 S appl 10 x is B OR Accounting 1:42 PM B/9/2001 a ❑I 18 Revised 18 17 Revised 47 0 4,581,610.06 4,468,880.06 $ $ 3,826,347.00 $ 4,404,379.84 V r N .a.N N 10 4 07 CO N Oa m N CO- N m n w w w 0 0 0 0 O 0 co co r- r• N 112,730.00 $ 16,455.00 S 1,128 709,920.00 $ w Outlays this application 0 0 u7 10 w Seubert Invoice 145,267.27 $ a v o N 0 N N V r- 00 9 r- ✓ [D r w w w w 0 0 V1 0 4Nr 4-, r- N Construction --less deductions E 4 U DEO--Mon Federal 112,730.00 $ w Wausau Payment Due 112,730.00 S 636,553.00 $ w 0 0 0 M 1` 709,920.00 $ w Amount requested from BOR 4,581,610.06 S 4,563,846.06 $ 4,763,788.45 $ w u1 o a a o n CfI N a r a g r- N w w 49 b 0 A ci g IA $ 3,826,347.00 S 4,954,371.50 Non Federal Funds Returned to BOR Contractor: 0 0/ 0) N 0 N N 0 o a- 1f1 0 co M o N N ti ' m N 0 4N7 r- 0 0 C. O r-▪ : 0 v 0 0 N n 315,000.00 $ w w w 0 0 0 r-7 0 V1 ID 0 CO Or 0 N 1 co u7 M [O r- a r 1N w w w w Liquidated Damages Sub -totals: A F9 appl 10.xIsBOR Accounl.ing1:25 PM8/9/2001 Additional deductions from application 8: Liquidated Damages April 1, 2001-- June 14 2001: $ 21,000.00 Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Construction Observation --April 14- -June 2 $ 73,958.00 Engineering costs associated with defective work April 14--June 2 Total withheld: Paid to Wausau: $ 5,189.10 $ 100,147.10 $ 145,267.27 REQUEST FOR ADVANCE OR REMIURSEMENT (See instructions on back) OMB APPROVAL NO. 0348-0004 1. TYPE OF PAYMENT REQUESTED Standard Form 270 3. FEDERAL SPONSORING AGENCY AND ORGANTZAT1ON ELFI+4FNT TO WHICH THIS RETORT is sunlamp Department of Interior — Bureau of Reclamation 6. EMPLOYER IDEN TIF/CATION 7. Rurp IL•YT•S ACCOUNT NUMBER OR IDENTIFYING NUMBER 153390111844 NUMBER 826000223 9. RECIPSE+IT ORGANIZATION Nance : City of McCall Number arrd Sued : Pa Bar 986. 216 E.. Park 5t. Coy, Store o td au, Code -McCall. ID 83638 PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES a. 'X" one or barn Lars ❑x ADVANCE ❑ REINOIURSEMENT b 'X' the applicable bar--y ID FINAL ❑x PARTIAI. 4. FEDERAL GRANT OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER ASSIGNED BY FEDERAL AGENCY S..PERIOD COVERED BYMS REQUEST FROM (mouth. day. yeat 10 PAYEE (lirhere cheek is ro be sent (differe i rbmt iron 9y Name Number and Stater City. Stale and ZfP rod" : 1.COMPUTATION OF AMC/7,7 OF REIMBURSEMENT/ADVANCES REQUESTED (a) ?ROGRAMSIFUNCFIONS ACTIVITIES ➢ a. Total program (As of date) ourAys to day b. Lass: Cumulative program income C. Net program outlays (Lase a minus lute d- Esanated tact cash outlays for advance Prod e. total (Stun of t(nes c t$ df f. Nan -Federal shut of arnoum or lire e g. Federal stare of amount an line c h. Federal payments previously requested i- Federal share now requested [Litre g mimes line h) b. Ad+aMm required by month. when requested by Federal glamor agency For use i t making prescheduled advances 1st month 2hd month 3td month ALTERNATE COMPUTATION FOR ADVANCES ONLY (b) (c) s4/7V637eq , y£sy4/7Z 1 i� S9 7 96 > 99 7 ? >1 Estimated Federal cash outlays Chas will be made durum aeriod covered by the advance Less: E3ttmaLed balance of Federal cash an hared as al beaming of advance ociiud Amuum requited (Line a mortis line bJ TiASIS OP REQUEST ❑xcAsH ❑ ACCRUAL S. PARTIAL PAYMan REQUEST NUMBER MR THIS REQUEST TO (nsarth. day. Peal s TOTAI. Standard Form 270 OMB APPROVAL. NC. 13414 :00.1 R-LQUEST FOR DVANCE OR REIMBURSEMENT 1 L =-YPE OF PAYMFiNT ILEQUSTLD (Sec :nytrucrions on back) PAGE 1 OF 2 AGE a. :- one or bath ixat ^ VY AuvA,u(:s Rarsornts err b "S' the applicable ba: II LJ FINAL ax PARTIAL F.DERAL;'Pi7MSrCnRlIN1G AGENCY iC`! ANU [`.RGAN/ \TICK u i I' ; •F. :=L']LR AL GRANT nr� '; T ricer Ii7F_N7IIYING NUMBER WHIC:i'�iiIS RITORT ISSUBMITTED I ASSIGNED BY'. DFRAL AGENCY Drnartmezir of Ianen r - Bute.:u or Reul:unatiori 5_ 4'iPLoYE� :]WNTrF C:\' ;CM NUMBER ]- 1 EC-?lENT 011-CAv1.7AT: N [7. ACC:UUNS NUMB OR I '1ENT1IYINi: NUMBER 1s:i39O1I i8 Vame - Lily 'ajMcClLI V rnoEr surer : PO Box 986, 215 E. Park 51. C-ry, Slave wa7IP .`.:..1de %lrCia12. ID 33658 _PERIOD (:OVFHRrI D 1 Y THIS REQUEST FROM (month; retry, yerarzj 09/05/00 ICI PA uI'^ •Wherr_ c Leek 1S lU irr sear !%di ferret than :iem .Vwnbtr and a7recl Slate wui !IP awe COMPUTATION OF AMOUNT OF RI IMS(TRSEMEYTIADVAYCI:S REQI'ESITD :I&OGFAi1LS/7ITNCTIOMS,\CTiVITT i a. Toi:i pmgrza .Is of dwe) aurlays xi day .ers: C,;;rlai_:nve program (a) ,.- Ne: program truaaya {r.ne !i minor lee 1 61im:ted ei Lain .:ullays :or =Nen ` ;:moat al 1S lm. of lines ;:.. dl c. ti on-Feacral share ui am wit ut Iine e 1=enem tI share at amount An [Roe c a. 'Fe1cra pavrrltnis preyrpusiy rcii uc:sed 'ederai shire now reauesiea [I i= las !Inc n) Aoraz:ctts :cur by 1st month rarnuh, when reoucsred by Fesc:a1 ;rumor agcucy fur j 'mu 1nomh use in :nalang 1 ?resc:efat lr l .:avarice "ni :mi dl Ib) (c) 5 ? 3 :.T1•:11NAr1 COMPITTAT ON FOR. kI]VANCIZS ONLY -. ',:an:auto! --. J J .-asa uu[lays Thar •vt:l maot .:uzn¢ oe^u_ :avr_ra by :.he .:Jvar:r• .ter. an ::as:a as rlgl] (re:.ruesied ,C.ne 11111221 s 1i1le ,i e't::::_ i •'_ .:iVat'L 3ASIS OF :tEQU ^ST �Y c1sn — ACCRUAL 5. PARTIAL ?A'' NT REQUEST NUMBER :':4 EIS QUESr TO (March. Iv 'meat 09/05/0[ TOTAL 3r-8 0 9, B 9-2 16,455 16,455 16,455 16,455 Deductions from application 9&10: Liquidated Damages June 15-- August 9: $ 82,500.00 Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Construction ❑bservation--June 2-- July 27 $ 10,250.93 Engineering costs associated with defective work June 2--July 27 $ 'Total withheld: $ 'Payable to Wausau: $ Amount for application 9: $ Amount for application 10: $ 11,983.36 104,734.29 554,560.28 112,729.73 441,830.55 Application 8 Application 9 Application 10 Due application 8--before deductions: Deductions for liquidated damages and costs associated with default: Payable to Wausau --application 8 Due application 9--before deductions: Deductions for liquidated damages and costs associated with default: Payable to Wausau --application 9 Due application 10--before deductions: Deductions for liquidated damages and costs associated with default: Payable to Wausau --application 10 Total completed and stored to date: Less retainage: Net: Total completed and stored to date: Less retainage: Net: Net change in total completed and stored to date: Total completed and stored to date: Less retainage: Net: Net change in total completed and stored to date: 772,938.00 527, 523.63 245,414.37 $ 112,729.73 Amounts to be deducted from application 10--See below 112,729.73 546, 564.84 104,734.29 441,830.55 $ 3,022,706.83 151,135.34 2,871,571.49 3,141,369.71 157,068.49 2,984,301.22 112, 729.73 3,716,701.06 185,835.00 3,530,866.06 546,564.84 Deductions from application 8: Liquidated Damages Nov 3, 2000-- May 31, 2001: $ 315,000.00 Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Testing costs: $ 52,902.17 Construction Observation--lhru November 4, 2000 $ 28,649.94 Survey work: Sub total: Construction Observation -- November 4, 2000--April 14, 2001 Engineering costs associated with defective work November 4--April 14 (City and Legal Total withheld: $ 15,362.26 $ 96,914.37 $ 91,300.74 $ 5,704.52 $ 18,604.00 $ 527,523.63 Payable to Wausau: $ 245,414.37 m N V N r O ro n 0. m iv W N in d 0 0 O o 0 0 9 d 0 co n 44 n r co A f n 0 22- N N N G a - N y� V @ L .5 .. w 44 w N. 0 n 0 o a 0 n rr04 viet n0944 ou 4i 44 0 N 44 IwN f n T N- m A ea n A V e w n w w N w w R w w m o 0 0 m a von m 0 0 a D a a , A A 0 0 0 0 0 n n v o n 1- AN. m a m 1- hl 4-11. N n 99. 0 o O N n A O a V .9- a N V. R YI ww V. w w w w w w mm n4ry c o w o na9- m en 0 V n N 4 44 N b 0p G a T 1'1 N N V 1C N 0 A• T O. G+ o a9f00'9-na1-"'pp m di A N o n N 4 V 44 w W Al 4A w N w 01 w 44 w 44 4441 V. 49 a n $ 159,928.34 0 0 0 0 N A VN a v �+ m" *0 N a M w 44 pn a 44 44 m E u C a rn ro ro appl 10.xlsSheet312 44 PM819r2001 City of McCall, Idaho Budget Line Item Transfer ❑ate: Request Initiator: Transfer Amount: 8/9/2001 From: Account #: Account Title: Budget Actual YTD Unexpended Transfer Amount Revised Budget Cathleen Koch $ 1,500.00 10-50-136 Underage Grant OT 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 STATE REASON FOR TRANSFER: STATE ITEMS TO BE PROCURED AND JUSTIFICATION: ❑ept: Finance To: Account #: Account Title: Budget Actual YTD Unexpended Transfer Amount Revised Budget 10-50-140 Overtime 26,038.00 30,805.73 (4,767.73) 1,500.00 (3,267.73) For transfers of appropriation from one budget line item to another within a fund, the City Manager's approval is sufficient. Transfers of appropriation from one fund to another must be approved by City Council, by Ordinance. Either type of transfer is a budget amendment and will be reflected in the financial reports, budget to actual comparison accordingly. Dale Received by Treasurer: TREASURER RECOMMENDATION: ❑ate Approved: ❑epartment Head Signature ❑r Disapproved: Dale Entered in Books (Bud - CY): Initials: City Manager Signature F 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 G 01 m O 0 0 0 0 4 r r` r- D 0 p o ep a'- - 0 N 1 • eN r.)a ID e a (o 0 . r- r oo c 0 0 e.r N 01 M1 al ci 01 N . 7 r r r 1fi N fr 0 • VO r .. 1ri 4/ N Vl N K N N W W 4+ • 7 1. 0 a 0 0 N 0 01 0 CO q N N ▪ N 0 O. 0 111 0 cC 0 m 10 N N N 1 0 O en ci 1 N N • 7 ▪ ti 0 a f- co 0 W al 0 v r m a. F 01 °° T v MI 0 CO 0 Yl 10 11 CO N 01 1 0 v W N 41 44 41 N 4* N 41 N 49 4. 49 N 94 ▪ N ▪ N C. 01 ❑ 1- C 1 CO-01 1 N N N 10 r .4 Yi N N 41 0 N v 10 N 4,954,371.50 m 0, 01 a N 49 N 0 0 0 a C.'0 C..'0 N 1l) tr. v1 a1 N tr. .4 O OD-CD41 a r r r m 3,826,347.00 N N 7 3,099,972.00 o a o 0 ro 0 c co 0 N N N 01 m co a O. 01 a u] 0 1. r r. 19 w w w O C Q. .0 D ❑ l L b E 3 a_a 0 V1 0 C R ,p -al Y m T V N 11 N a c H N 4 r g L R N C E 0 q 7 O C LL• - iE N .. .... t L1 C w N C d H E O a d O A 2 T S. ' ▪ L Lt. E.,(aj 0 a ] W E a 3 m 3 O O d O N 1.7 L] 0 0 0 2 u. R' J' - cc, - N A .4 10 E_ R u a N N O 0 a` V R a 0 4, 0 01 4 c the delay —not billed to BOR yet: 8/9/200112:45 PMappl 10.xlsaieel4 CO m m C u0 t ✓ i- i- I- CO r CO Cr v cr r- (- a) vN- OO N N CV r 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 LC] LC] Li xi U) V) EA 69 EA 419 69 r- OD OD CT) Cr u) r co ✓ r- r- r-cflrao0 4 r~ r~ CO U ' Cr�i-cnvcfl N CV N 0 0 Cr) 0 0 0 04cn 4 i U ) iri CC] 4 E9 EA Ef} 69 EA EA V) ✓ CO CO CO CON LC] cr7 co, co co_ C) 4 O Cr 0 co 1- 71-- q tt � 4 v 4 EA 414 EA E9 E9 u7 10 r~ r~ t-- Cfl r~ cv i n ✓ ,-- r C) N - C) N OD d] d] a] C) 00 0 (- r- ai (- r~ ai co - co c, 4 co coO N a) a) ir) r7 a] co —V 4 Cr r 69 419 69 EA E9 EA EA t t CV CV N N N ✓ N CO CO OD CO CT) 7 CO ODD CO OD 0 o O cr7 Cr c' Cr cr7 69 64 E9 4R V) 69 N a7 7 cr CD cu E ❑ = NE cr L a) ct o_ ro p °J w a 0 a) 3 aS Z E?0 0 2 ¢, c E E ro >, co -5 ro sa o E a 76 (O a a a I- N sa ro 2 a -O a7 aJ a] J f Z LL - Z LL Il f- LL 0 0 ao0cr0't r7N00 d7 a7 CO 0 r~ a7 r r r-r CY]N 69 69 V) EA, E9 8/9/200112:45 PMappl 10.xlsSheet2 [D O N Q En CO C'4 Q - N N w4Q vQu�(0 (mLc) ca) `r? N r m Qup V cD cV r M LD L 10 10 rn CD Qom)CD CVCVCVV N 17 N N ID m coN (N- EC c17 (0 l7 u7 V1 u7 O N C) C) O co c➢ to CD CD Na. C1 CO N CD W N m C)[D C)O CV N r CD ED Q r (0 COr O r N C" In C) CV -0 a) 0 O IDLc) Lc) N ClO N. N rc0 In m • r0) rnrn eCc) N Q ED 9— cv al - .a a).w CO LC) N 0_Q QQ .q 0) v n5 NN.:0) ca 0) to CD CD .I) 10 up m N 10 @ E"° to - a)r v C Fa ca N N u7 S ` ^ (0 O co `1 CD 01 I!1 N 0) 0) 10 a) L17 a) f? O C)00 co Z, to cD V Li, CO ram] ram] CVO Q CD N- 0 CO cD cp N • N N NN (0 1 0r] N N CO CO In C) C) C) r] O v [D CO a) U cD t 6 (0 0 a 4'1 If] -a-If] C N .- u) cc) C -y O c▪ • = N b9 1/7 CO O7 O7 cj O7 ` V O C E r (N'S 0 Q NO L. C C [D) 10 O Tr O C ❑ m• - v a) 1— 1— r r _ m An c • o V I CI C Q- . 0_c.+ c ¢ L o .-.. •Ci c")-3 0) r 0) N c7 O Cl N- CD C) c7 '6 to Q 00) a LO 60 r. GO C1 V r V N ti O ID r] C) [D I,--c[0 c7 w Q Q V Q cD Lf) Q7 w r W cO M d c'7 c7 01 no 0) no to c0 �, •E 0 r] N co no o N C1 iv in [V N 2 N O r -E- CO r :7 L. P _ r cc) c7 ❑ C1 1+ W In 'd N LO !-- cp C w _ _ C) C] • aV. 0N1F cc) N- .1. I j .or r 1N- N V V. N r- Q1 Q :, dr co rCFI r 1'• c.0 N cD 47 r� C ▪ I 'n CO 01 r7 CV g v5 en en to vs vs 44 el en (0 e3 ty 69 '3 z 6-4 el a y, a)m C m C D _c a) A) N N c9 f9 W [0 c9 co w o a ❑ a a ❑ m S= _c U op ❑ 4 3 '3 v =o o` `a ti a N co N R1 3 N a -O ctl co C m m KI 0 0 C a a- a v w m CD 0 N D cllD w (AN [p [6 A7 0. C a C a N N in.N EE rn E 'a d o 0 0.,f a,0 o 0 v ❑ a -0 a m Yrn .. 76 w .2w- c C a g-J 2 !- -J 2 C❑ w D y T L) al T y= 0 o M o LM f D d N �p �q) E y= L dv VI -0 U a w £ 2� a ma a m C 0 o aw❑ � m 7' ❑ rJ � � ;� � E a a 3 D II i '� 'D [7 ID P. OO 2- y 0) -Cr 7 0) L C ' co Cb 14 N . 2 D `D 3 O ❑ � � c a cam] C O U C r Q L R Q •❑ P] 4O N 07 Q -� u = a 16 co _ = D N a 61 o N N 7 ca R❑ N 0 < 2000_000 Z O co co ❑ d� CO0 _ lApplication 8 8/9/2001 appl 10 x1s12•46 PM Liquidated Damages Nov 3, 2000--May 31, 2001: Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Testing costs: Construction Observation--thru November 4, 2000 Survey work: Sub total: Construction Observation --November 2, 2000--April 14, 2001 Engineering costs associated with defective work City and Legal Total withheld: 8/9/200112:46 PMapp 8.xlsSheetl S 315,000,00 $ 52,902.17 $ 28,649.94 $ 15,362.26 $ 96,914.37 $ 91,300.74 5 5,704.52 $ 18,604.00 $ 527,523.63 n oN or'7r m o o M1 •o o okr) m CT1 CO L N r N 10 r M1 (O t CO N r `Y' (O u7 (/) V) r1 u7 CO M1 N 0) c vi i ❑1 t0 N N CD N( r CDf• rD Q7 N N '!) lry 4 r r f0 47 r 6.17- 69 69 V1 $ 112,729 68 v1 r1 r co u7 0 0 C1 V N 01 i co un N Q w (D r+ p1 06 ❑1 0 N 61 C0 E r'n m a c = a7�`-' c'm 04 r uJ N fA = GO o 0 V eec o 0 0 CO 0, u1 6 V +..i o C] (D CO ti(n cou7 CJ (O 1ri 0 co ~ CO 'et ti �'!7 P.. 0. r c7 -a r)9 V) 69 69 P. CO C N N ON 112 N u] £ R i a O 0 a C ❑ N N a1 t d V C £ G 0 R O a)V O m m a ti °J CL r 0. •m C1 ❑1 r CO N 01 O C1 M1 CO C] P7 N _ DO r)Q r� N r)- 0 CO co en. co n .o6 1n r ❑7 (0 0 C9 r9 r 07 Cp [1 _d MC)07 O = •E O C7 M1 CO CD N LEI N C9 ,V. n r u7 r) En en.!+ 0) 10 N 'r) r (a c N _ i rr M1 NN r�u7 O r+N Lai N 7.0t• 10 COrf_N VV Nr-0 ❑ C.7 .0 r OD r r Cr}r ry 10 N 'D 'J] r Q7 n C] N )'l N L 2 h+ V) V) b9 139 b9 V) 49 69 69 69 F9 CO Vi 3 L a c] 0 N N R a C �U 6) ❑ L co d m 7 7 a ro N r6 V 2 N n o 0 -V -0 0 d -0 r 0 V1 m 3 3 a 0 IApplicalion 8 ❑ o v) cc) 0 0 O C] a a v m c cvea ro 80 0 a eel - p co y 0 coQ1 81 r Ca (v. a) o 0cc it •0 a C -❑ Nal £ f6 £ W a1 O p 07 a '8 i7 U N b 0 0 C T N 0 ❑ (9 ToN . 7 N„ C C Q ❑ 0 w o a] 0 C c N 0 y CA U F J Z o a _'a 00 7 m 0 0 61 7; CO Q m aa) 0 'm a 0 u L ❑ 0 0 0. 0 % =O V a 7 p £ a co C7 0Cf] a-0 W a) ... _ — o , — a i 16 7=e —tea v a o m r Q t ❑ 7-9 2- [] d C N m n w m- 01 ID � 0 il Q 07 D C) (0 7 a) 0❑ N 0 Q 2 ❑ ❑[LOOS 22 in o.0 o a)� rnt— or co go u7 (0 (0 r'7 r'1 Q) N (D 0) N. 0 P C] p N [p 10 4 O CO r 0 1.1 ¢]0 00 DI PI rc"1 N r a) 0) rn v ❑) N. v C7 r'1 r'1 CO O N CO 0 0 0 o 9— (D CO CO '!7 '!7 '0) CO CO CO (O C7 CO u7 10 r (D (D [D M1 O) co u7 V C7 C] en ('1 o 4 [p (. fr) 0. .r). 0 (00 uj 1.0 )0 61 V 'I] ti C) Q0 Q0 a7 u7 N r r'1 0. V V c O q 01 V V c 0 00 1r1 0 4 4 r N 0) C7 r r ,- co v ON1 vim) N uun r en SJ ') 4 4 (D Q) (O CO CO N 0' 0 CO CI Cl 819/200lappl 9 xls 12 46 PM (0 C) r- CD el .- 07 0, OO O ( 0, r- ry 4 47 4 u7 C] W LO N- a, L CV C1 ti 4 00 Ch Q)cq r 4 V QD c0 N r c'] c0 NI Lf) 4 r I�7 N r ti V CO r) M Cr)cl N 4alrN-ti 0 6 454 c-N 47 tn cal (0(0 S 112,729.68 41 (0 )- co (0 N (p 47 (0 ti (0 N E N � F � � c0 o cO a 0 0 0 aD CDr(imm aD CO (❑ (OL 0 -Nr- (010 n7 r) (1) 49 60 (0 03 N r) N 44(049 u7 In 40 w (f) U') u7 (n 40 w 3 U ID m 70 m C 0 0 0- _ _ cc 7 7 (0 N CO m 0 a,a -0 0u) 5 L U m m 3 a 00 0 - - f!1 1(1 W. C (0 m 0 ❑ c'1 C ❑ m 0 0 14 � E_77 (0c A ❑ ❑ C M 0 a co co o 42 'a •N' `N' U al.E73 d a o an m O y U U C _ - 2 N ' - N c N c t o ❑ a]] - C C N C N dl _U f9 1— J Z b -- A) c0 O m c C y 7° 0 a co... in a v 2-- a E m 0 0. -0 .0 -0 t7 = N w E d a a 07 -0 n m o m m fa', }' E g ro O 05 .Q 7 1T .c E W C❑ `p W O 0 R T t[pp 7 0 Q1 �R C❑ L) co 0 Q L ❑ O [p R Q 0 y �0 d rd U1 ca 7:5U V L U 35 9 [] a L C N CS 7 [d 7 W N CC Q 6 Q] 7 0) as0 c) c6 ❑ H 0 ct Q Z ❑ ❑ d ❑ O it Z < C) rJ 0 0 c)— CA t — Q 0 N. (0 M o 4) 10 (O el CM CD CV (O 0)r co C COCD N o[0 44) a r (0 (0r O 10 10 a) CD 00 (-Cr) 0 I,- r- 4'7 LA-)4) N r7 (0 N 0) 0) 0) v Oh r- v r) r) (D O N (O 07 v r (A CD CD 0 O a r a (O c0 (0 47 47 44) ry r0) C7 a) 40 r) OD 47 W (O up CD wall+) 47 a ti CV CC) ti r- 0 a (0 r~- r) 010)COa ac0 10 (0 10 41 47 a (0 41 ti C) aD aDCO 47 N ('7 Ca a s V a O V 01 V a a (0 m 47 O q q a r! aI )r a rerrr r r QD N- C) 44l 4))) 4) tr M- (O 0) ((0 ((0 (O cv 0 r r r 0) 912001appl 9.xls12 46 PM City of McCall, Idaho Budget Line Item Transfer Date: Request Initiator: Transfer Amount: 8/9/2001 From: Account #: Account Title: Budget Actual YTD Unexpended Transfer Amount Revised Budget Cathleen Koch $ 1,500.00 10-50-136 Underage Grant OT 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 STATE REASON FOR TRANSFER: STATE ITEMS TO BE PROCURED AND JUSTIFICATION: Dept: Finance To: Account #: Account Title: Budget Actual YTD Unexpended Transfer Amount Revised Budget 10-50-140 Overtime 24,538,00 30,805.73 (6,267.73) 1,500.00 (4,767.73) For transfers of appropriation from one budget line item to another within a fund, the City Manager's approval is sufficient. Transfers of appropriation from one fund to another must be approved by City Council, by Ordinance. Either type of transfer is a budget amendment and will be reflected in the financial reports, budget to actual comparison accordingly. Date Received by Trcasurer: TREASURER RECOMMENDATION: Date Approved: Department Head Signature or Disapproved: Date Enlered in Books (Bud - CY): Initials: City Manager Signature Application 8 Application 9 Application 10 Due application 8--before deductions: Deductions for liquidated damages and costs associated with default: Payable to Wausau --application 8 Due application 9--before deductions: Deductions for liquidated damages and costs associated with default: Payable to Wausau --application 9 ❑ue application 10--before deductions: Deductions for liquidated damages and costs associated with default: Payable to Wausau --application 10 Total completed and stored to date: Less retainage: Net: Total completed and stored to date: Less retainage: Net: Net change in total completed and stored to date: Total completed and stored to date: Less retainage: Net: Net change in total completed and stored to date: 772,938.00 527,523.63 245,414.37 $ 112,729.73 Amounts to be deducted from application 10--See below 112,729.73 546,564.84 104,734.29 441,830.55 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,022,706.83 151,135.34 2,871,571.49 3,141,369.71 157,068.49 2,984,301.22 112,729.73 3,716,701.06 185,835.00 3,530,866.06 546,564.84 Deductions from application 8: Liquidated Damages Nov 3, 2000-- May 31, 2001: $ 315,000.00 Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Testing costs: $ 52,902.17 Construction Observation--thru November 4, 2000 $ 28,649.94 Survey work: $ 15,362.26 Sub total: $ 96,914.37 Construction Observation -- November 4, 2000--April 14, 2001 $ Engineering costs associated with defective work November 4--April 14 $ City and Legal $ Total withheld: $ 91,300.74 5,704.52 18,604.00 527,523.63 Payable to Wausau: $ 245,414.37 Additional deductions from application 8: Liquidated Damages April 1, 2001-- June 14 2001: $ 21,000.00 Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Construction Observation --April 14- -June 2 $ 73,958.00 Engineering costs associated with defective work April 14--June 2 $ 5,189.10 Total withheld: $ 100,147.10 Paid to Wausau: $ 145,267.27 Deductions from application 9810: Liquidated Damages June 15-- August 9: $ 82,500.00 Additional costs associated with the delay/default: Construction ❑bservation--June 2-- July 27 $ 10,250.93 Engineering costs associated with defective work June 2--July 27 $ 11,983.36 Total withheld; $ 104,734.29 Payable to Wausau: $ 554,560.28 (Amount for application 9: $ 112,729.73 (Amount for application 10: $ 441,830.55 Outlays before this application Outlays this application Seubert Invoice Construction --less deductions City Admin Jl1B DEQ--Non Federal Amount requested from BOR Outlays following this application Non Federal Funds Returned to BOR Reductions in Payment to Contractor not also claimed as costs: Liquidated Damages JUB Costs associated with the delay• -not billed to BOR yet: Sub -totals: Total: Total Program Outlays in terms of work completed (less retainage): 14 161 3099972 709920 $ 16,455.00 $ 16,455.00 .I I4L44.I LF41.1.L 4141 709920 $1 6,455.00 1511 17 18 .F 4F 4F 4:44441�.µ j ,111111,111111111J /(1111111 ..F 4F4Ll4lf 4. �LFiJF. $ 21,000.00 $ 79,147.10 191 Outlays before this application Outlays this application Seubert Invoice Construction --less deductions City Admin JUB DEQ--Non Federal Amount requested from BOR Outlays following this application Non Federal Funds Returned to BOR Reductions in Payment to Contractor not also claimed as costs: Liquidated Damages JUB Costs associated with the delay —not billed to BOR yet: Sub -totals: Total: Total Program Outlays in terms of work completed (less retainage): 14 16 3099972 $ 3,809,892.00 709920 $ 16,455.00 $ 16,455.00 $ 159,928.34 709920 $ 16,455.00 $ 3,826,347.00 15 17 18 $ 3,826,347.00 $ 4,404,379.84 $ 4,451,116.06 $ 1,128,024.50 $ 341,644.61 $ 112,730.00 $ 1,127,724.50 $ 145,267.27 $ 112,730.00 $ 300.00 S 18,212.10 $ 160,401.24 $ 17,764.00 $ 1,128,024.50 $ 636,553.00 $ 112,730.00 $ 4,954,371.50 $ 4,746,024.45 $ 4,563,846.06 $ 17,764.00 $ 549,991.66 $ 294,908.39 $ 315,000.00 $ 21,000.00 $ 193,919.63 $ 79,147.10 $ 508,919.63 $ 100,147.10 $ 609,066.73 $ 5,172,912.79 191