Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout07) 7E ECAPCity Council January 15 , 2013 Page 2 27 cities within the San Gabriel Valley participating in the EECAP project. The objectives of the PSC were to : confirm a regional approach to Plan development; gu ide the project; share best practices among jurisdictions ; and support the creation of tailored , local Plans. 5. On August 7, 2011, the City entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the COG for the CEESP, which provided funding for the development of energy efficiency chapters of Climate Action Plans and the implementation of an online municipal facility utility manager. 6. On June 27 , 2012, project consultant PMC conducted a staff lunch and workshop with City employees, which generated support for the implementation of the Plan by providing a project overview to City staff participants and identifying energy efficiency project priorities within City facilities. 7. On June 27 , 2012, representatives from PMC , the COG and City staff conducted an energy efficiency fa ir that provided project information to members of the community through personal energy action surveys and educational games. 8. On July 5, 2012, as a component of the Plan, the City entered into a Consultant Services Agreement with Willdan Energy Solutions (WES) for ASHRAE Level 2 Energy Efficiency Audit Services at City facilities (i.e., City Hall ; Live Oak Park Community Center; Civic Center; District Parking Lots 3 , 5A & 58 and 7A ; and City Parking Lots 8A & 88). An ASRAE Level 2 audit is a stringent assessment of energy usage and is requ ired for the development of the energy effic iency chapter of the City 's upcoming Climate Action Plan . 9 . On July 12 , 2012, representatives from PMC and the COG made a presentation regarding the purpose of the Plan at a special joint meeting of the City Council and the Temple City Unified School D istrict. 10. On September 12, 2012 , City staff (i.e ., Community Development Director Steve Masura, City Engineer Neville Pereira, Public Safety Officer Bryan Ariizumi and Management Analyst Teresa Santilena) and representatives from WES met to d iscuss the initial findings of the ASH RAE Level 2 Energy Efficiency Audit and made comments to be incorporated into the final report. 11 . On September 27, 2012, WES distributed the Final Energy Efficiency Audit Report (Attachment "C"), detailing energy usage and potential energy savings at City facilities . 12. On October 10 , 2012 , City staff (i.e ., Community Development Director Steve Masura, Public Safety Officer Bryan Ariizum i and Management Analyst Teresa Santilena) and representatives from PMC and the COG met to discuss the initial findings of the Plan and made comments to be incorporated into the final report. City Council January 15, 2013 Page 3 13. On December 31, 2012, PMC distributed the Final Energy Action Plan , detailing Temple City 's electricity profile and provi'ding a menu of strategies for reducing energy usage throughout the City . ANALYSIS: The Plan is the product of a year-long collaboration between the City, the COG and PMC . Membership in the COG has enabled Temple City to participate in the Plan 's development at a significant cost savings . While a typical Energy Action Plan costs between $40,000 and $80,000 to create, Temple City 's Plan was developed as part of the annual dues for COG membership (i.e ., $15,725). The Plan provides a roadmap to help Temple City meet AB 32 GHG emissions reduction targets by defining the City 's long-term vision and commitment to achieve energy efficiency in the community and in municipal operations . The Plan qualifies the City to seek grant funding to finance energy efficient improvements that will reduce energy bills of the City, residents and businesses. Implementation of the Plan will lessen the community 's environmental impact associated with energy consumption . The Plan also provides critical baseline data that the State requires from cities to address GHG emissions. Finally, the Plan serves as a foundation for future planning efforts such as general plan updates, climate action plans, and Housing Element and zoning code updates . The Plan is broken into four main sections : Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Forecast ; Electricity Profile; Electricity Energy Efficiency Strategy; and Implementation: 1. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Forecast The City began the planning process by completing a GHG emissions inventory and forecast (Inventory). The Inventory provides a detailed summary of the largest sources of GHG emissions and electricity trends throughout the community and in municipal facilities . This information helps the City identify opportunities for reductions in energy usage that respond to local conditions. The Inventory provides total GHG emissions and electricity-specific emissions for a baseline year (i.e ., 2006) as well as an update for an interim year (i .e ., 201 0). This information has been translated into the common measure of metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTC02e). This measure serves as a common benchmark that allows for accurate comparison between all cities in the San Gabriel Valley participating in the Plan . AB 32 recommends that local governments adopt a GHG reduction target of 15% below baseline levels by 2020. To achieve this goal , the City would need to facilitate a reduction in emissions of 17,470 MTC02e . Since 2006, the City has put City Council January 15, 2013 Page 4 energy efficiency measures into place resulting in a decrease of GHG emissions. In 2006 , Temple City emitted approximately 186 ,320 MTC02e of greenhouse gases, while 2010 emissions are estimated at 178,420 MTC02e , representing a 4% reduction. The Community-Wide Inventory includes activity data for many community sectors including energy, transportation , waste , off-road equipment, water. and wastewater . On-road transportation created the most GHG emissions in the City in the baseline year, 98,830 MTC02e. or 53% of the 186,320 MTC02e total. Emissions went down in most community sectors between 2006 and 2010 . The Municipal Inventory includes GHG emissions from the operations and activities conducted by the City . Outdoor lighting created the most GHG emissions from City facilities in the baseline year, 360 MTC02e, or 41% of the 880 MTC02 e total. Emissions remained roughly the same for municipal operations between 2006 and 2010 . The Inventory also includes em1ss1ons forecasts for three different scenarios relative to the baseline year emissions levels : Business As Usual , which assumes no actions or policies will be put in place to reduce GHG emissions; Adjusted Business As Usual, which accounts for State actions to reduce GHG emissions, such as regulations affecting vehicle and building standards; and State 's Recommended 2020 Reduction Targets , which forecasts GHG emissions combining the State's reduction targets with the City's Energy Action Plan . 2. Electricity Profile The Electricity Profile (Profile) explains how electricity is used by the City and various parts of the community . The most common uses of electricity are : lighting and heating/cooling buildings ; powering appliances; and pumping water around the City into homes and treatment plants . The Plan outlines practical programs and policies to support efficiency and conservation of electricity in the community . For example , when completing energy efficiency retrofits of buildings , there is a loading order that should be followed to maximize energy savings while minimizing added costs . The Community-Wide Profile measures residential electricity use on a per household basis. It notes that 89 .2% of total land area within the City is designated for residential development, making it the predominant land use. Additionally, the majority of homes (i.e ., 88% of housing units) are single-family residences . These homes , especially those more than 30 years old, represent the greatest opportunity for energy reductions in the City. Temple City's per household electricity use is slightly higher than average for the San Gabriel Valley, and slightly lower than average for California . The Community-Wide Profile also measures electricity use within the commercial and industrial employment sector City Council January 15, 2013 Page 5 on a per job basis . The City 's per job electricity use is lower than average for both the region and the State. The Municipal Profile measures total electricity used by the City and details usage in three subcategories : facilities; public lighting; and water pumping. Between 2006 and 2010, the City saw an increase of approximately 5% in total municipal electricity use . Electricity used for City facilities increased by 13% over the four year period . Public lighti ng is the largest user of municipal electricity and electricity used for this purpose increased by 6% between 2006 and 2010 . Electri city used for water pumping decreased by 7% over the same period. 3. Electricity Energy Efficiency Strategy The Electricity Energy Efficiency Strategy (Strategy) has identified seven topic areas to focus the City's reduction efforts : existing residential buildings; existing nonresidential buildings; new development; planning framework; urban cooling; water and electricity efficiency; and municipal operations . Each topic area identifies a goal, which is the expected outcome related to electricity reductions. Each goal is followed by several policies that guide decis ion-making and provide the foundati on for quantifying electricity reduction potentials. Each policy is supported by several implementation actions that provide interim steps or supporting strategies to increase the electricity reduction potential of each policy. The Strategy includes a mix of incentives, outreach, and regulatory actions to allow for flexibility in pursuit of each goal. Incentive-based actions involve the City working with regional, State and Federal partners to promote existing rebate , design assistance and financing programs. Organizations with incentive programs include the COG , SCE , the California Energy Commission, and Los Angeles County. Outreach-oriented actions involve promotion and education to help residents and businesses save money on utility bills , such as employing the Temple City Chamber of Commerce and community groups to share energy efficiency information and resources with the community . The Strategy also calls for the City to consider regulatory actions to reduce energy consumption. For example , adopting voluntary guidelines for staff use in plan review that help applicants identify opportunities for energy efficiency improvements . 4. Implementation Plan The Implementation Plan (Implementation) outlines a path for the City to apply the strategies described by the Plan and monitor the City 's overall progress toward achieving the electricity reduction targets. It requ ires City leadership to execute strategies and report the progress of the Plan. The Implementation identifies the responsib le department for each policy and offers time frames and plan-level cost estimates for implementing each strategy . It also calls for City staff to monitor the progress of the Plan on an annual basis and report the findings to the C ity Council City Council January 15 , 2013 Page 6 each year. Additionally , the Plan recommends that staff regularly review and update the City's GHG inventory , energy profile, and action plan; continue to develop collaborative partnerships that support implementation of the Plan ; and support regional funding efforts to implement the Plan . The Plan includes an Implementation Program Table which identifies : the electricity and GHG emissions reductions expected for each action; performance targets; expected savings for participants ; time frames; responsible departments; and relevant partners involved. Next Steps-Municipal Facilities and Community-Wide Audits The municipal facilities audit performed by WES provided a menu of energy efficiency measures (EEMs) that will enable the City to implement actions to save energy, reduce emissions and lower operating costs . Each EEM details : anticipated energy savings ; anticipated annual cost savings; e~timated incentives and rebates; total cost to the City; the estimated payback period based on the overall cost and annual savings; and the expected life of new equipment. Staff will also release a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a community-wide investment grade audit to measure current energy usage and potential energy savings related to: street lights; signal lights; irrigations systems ; and heating , ventilation and air conditioning systems . After a presentation by PMC and any public comments, the City Council is requested to review and approve the Energy Action Plan . Upon approval of the Plan, all improvement strategies will undergo thorough staff and engineering review to determine areas of highest priority and greatest feasibility. CONCLUSION : Adoption of Resolution No . 13-4884 approving the Energy Action Plan will provide the City a broad vision and a toolbox or menu of strategies and actions to reduce electricity use and GHG emissions in Temple City. PMC has carefully integrated their recommendations with the results of the facilities audit performed by WES . The Plan also plays an integral role in the planned General Plan update, identifies opportunities for energy efficiency throughout the community , and guides the City in creating a comprehensive approach to energy efficiency. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of the Energy Action Plan will not cause immediate impact upon the City 's budget. The Plan will allow the City to pursue a variety funding options (i.e ., grants, incentive programs and loans) with the COG, SCE and the San Gabriel Valley Energy Wise Partnership . The Plan recommends that the City consider using SCE 's Zero- Interest Financing for Qualified Energy Efficiency Projects program that would allow the City Council January 15 , 2013 Page 7 City to repay a zero -interest loan through savings on monthly utility bills to fund municipal retrofits . The Plan also recommends the City carry out its policies as funding becomes available . Staff will work with the COG and other regional partners to identify additional funding sources . Adoption of the Plan will positi on the City to benefit from regional resources and funding to implement community-wide and municipal programs, and provides support for the City to apply for competitive grant funding. Implementation of specific Plan measures will be coordinated with City improvements , such as : the Rosemead Boulevard Safety Enhancement and Beautification Project ; the upcoming Las Tunas Drive Project; and other Capital Improvement Projects . ATTACHMENTS: A, Draft Resolution No. 13-4884 B. City of Temple City Energy Action Plan C . Willdan Energy Solutions Energy Efficiency Audit Report ATTEST : C ITY CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution , Resolution No . 13-4884, was duly passed , approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 151 h day of January 2013 , by the following vote : AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN : Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- 2 CITY CLERK ATTACHMENT "8" DECEMBER 2012 Strategic Plan Task 2.8, Deliverable #7 Funded by: Southern California Edison Company Local Government Strategic Plan Strategies Program 2010-2012 Program Period under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission Prepared for: City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, CA 91780 Prepared by: PMC 860 Walnut Street, Suite B San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 In association with Fehr & Peers San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments 1000 S. Fremont Ave ., Un it #42 Building A-10, Suite 10210 Alhambra, CA 91803 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • This Energy Action Plan was prepared by PMC for the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the City of Temple City. The preparation of this Plan was funded by Southern California Edison as part of the Local Government Strategic Plan Program for the 2010-2012 period under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Chapter I: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... I Purpose and Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Southern California Edison and the California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan ...................... 2 The Energy Leader Partnership Model .................................................................................................................... 4 Role of the EAP ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 City Profile ...................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Temple City's Built Environment ............................................................................................................................ 1 0 Future Development and Recent Sustainability Efforts .................................. : ................................................... I I The EAP Pla nning Process ......................................................................................................................................... I I Project Steering Committee ..................................................................................................................................... 12 Outreach to City Staff ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Workshops and Community Events ....................................................................................................................... 13 Cha pter 2 : GHG Inventory and Forecast .................................................................................................................. 17 Inventory and Forecasting Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 17 Description of Re levant Emissions and Key Concepts ...................................................................................... 18 Community-Wide Inventory Summary .................................................................................................................. IS 20 I 0 Community Emissions Update ...................................................................................................................... 20 Mu~i cipal Inventory Summary .................................................................................................................................. 21 Business-as-Usual GHG Emissions Forecast ........................................................................................................ 23 Community Bus iness-as-Usual Forecast ................................................................................................................ 23 Municipal Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................................................................... 24 CITY OF HMPLE CITY TABLE OF CONTENTS State Adjustments to Bus iness-As-Usual (ABAU) Forecast ............................................................................. 25 Reduction Targets ....................................................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 3: Electricity Profile ......................................................................................................................................... 29 lntroduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 29 The Electricity Reduction Loading Order ............................................................................................................. 30 Community Electricity Uses ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Comparison to Regional and County Uses .......................................................................................................... 33 Municipal Electricity Uses .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Chapter 4 : Energy Efficiency Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 39 Reduction Targets ....................................................................................................................................................... 39 Community Strategies ................................................................................................................................................ 42 Municipal Strategies ............................................................................................. , ...................................................... 50 Reduction Summary ............................................................................................. , ..................................................... 54 Chapter 5: Implementation ... , ....................................................................................................................................... 57 lntroduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 57 Implementation Plan ......................................................................................................................... , ......................... 58 Implemen tation Policies ............................................................................................................................................. 58 Monitoring and Updating the EAP .......................................................................................................................... 60 Implementation Program ........................................................................................................................................... 61 Chapter 6: Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 67 Glossary ofTerms ........................................................................................................................................................... 69 References ......................................................................................................................................................................... 81 Appendix A: Personal Energy Action Survey ............................................................................................................ 83 Appendix B: GHG Inventory and Forecast ............................................................................................................... 87 Inventory and Forecast Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 87 Relevant Emissions .......................................................................................................................................................... 87 Community ................................................................................................................................................................... 88 Municipal ....................................................................................................................................................................... 88 Key Concepts ................................................................................................................................................................... 89 Community-Wide lnventory ......................................................................................................................................... 89 Inventory Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 89 Detailed Analysis by Sector ...................................................................................................................................... 90 Municipal Inventory ......................................................................................................................................................... 91 Inventory Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 91 Detailed Analysis by Sector ...................................................................................................................................... 92 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Relation to Community-Wide Inventory .............................................................................................................. 93 Business-as-Usual Forecast ............................................................................................................................................ 94 Community BAU Indicators ..................................................................................................................................... 94 Community Business-as-Usual Forecast ................................................................................................................ 95 Municipal Business-as-Usual Forecast .................................................................................................................... 96 State Adjusted Forecast ............................................................................................................................................. 97 Reduction Targets ........................................................................................................................................................ I 00 State-Recommended 2020 and 2035 Reduction Targets ............................................................................... 100 Conclusion and Next Steps ........................................................................................................................................ I 02 Appendix C: GHG Methods and Assumptions Report ....................................................................................... I 03 Appendix D: Energy Action Plan -Energy leader Partnership Requirements Checklist -November 2012 ................................................................................................................................................................................. 127 LIST OFT ABLES Table I: Employed Population by Industry, 20 I 0 ....................................................................................................... 9 Table 2 : Number and Type of Businesses, 2012 ...................................................................................................... 10 Table 3: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 (MTC02e) ......................................................... 19 Table 4: Comparison of Activity Data and GHG Emissions, 2006-20 I 0 ........................................................... 20 Table 5: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 (MTC02e) .......................................................................... 22 Table 6: Business-as-Usual Forecasting Indicators, 2006-2020 ............................................................................ 23 Table 7 : Comparison of Community-Wide BAU Forecasts by Sector, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) .................. 24 Table 8 : Comparison of Municipal BAU Forecasts by Sector, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) ................................... 24 Table 9: Impact of State Reductions on Community Emissions, 2020 (MTC02e) .......................................... 26 Table 10: Community Adjusted BAU Forecast, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) ............................................................ 26 Table II: Impact of State Reductions on Municipal Em issions, 2020 (MTC02e) ............................................ 27 Table 12: Municipal ABAU Forecast, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) ............................................................................... 27 Table 13 : Comparison of BAU Forecast and Reduction Target, 2006-2020 ................................................... 28 Table 14: Housing Units by Type, 20 I 0 ..................................................................................................................... 32 Table 15 : City of Temple City, Municipal Electricity Use, 2006 ........................................................................... 35 Table 16: Top Electricity Users, 2006-20 10 ............................................................................................................. 37 Table 17: Near-Term Municipal Energy Efficiency Projects .................................................................................. 51 Table 18: Implementation Program Table ................................................................................................................. 61 Table B-1: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector ...................................................................................... 90 Table B-2 : Detailed Activity Data and GHG Emissions .......................................................................................... 91 Table B-3 : Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector ...................................................................................................... 92 Table B-4 : Detailed Municipal Activity Data and GHG Emissions ....................................................................... 93 Table B-5 : BAU Growth Indicators and Affected Sectors ..................................................................................... 95 Table B-6: Community BAU Emissions by Sector ................................................................................................... 95 Table B-7 : Municipal BAU Emissions by Sector ........................................................................................................ 97 Table B-8 : Impact of State Policies on Community GHG Emissions .................................................................. 99 Table B-9 : Comparison of Community BAU and ABAU Forecast.. .................................................................... 99 Table B-1 0 ; Impact of State Policies on Municipal GHG Emissions .................................................................. I 00 Table B-11: Comparison of Municipal BAU and ABAU Forecast ..................................................................... 100 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • TABLE OF CONTENTS Table B-12: Community GHG Emissions and State-Recommended Reduction Targets ............................ 101 Table B-13: Municipal GHG Emissions and State-Recommended Reduction Targets ................................. I 0 I LIST OF FIGURES Figure I : "Big Bold" Strategies of the CEESP .............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Partners in the EAP Planning Process .......................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3 : Energy Leader Partnership Model ................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 4: Ethnicity and Race, 20 I 0 ................................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 5: The EAP Planning Process ............................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 6: Summary of Outreach Events ...................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 7 : Completed Energy Efficiency Upgrades .................................................................................................... 14 Figure 8: Energy Efficiency Upgrades that Would Be Considered in the Next 5 Years ................................. l5 Figure 9: Incentives or Motivators for Energy Efficiency Upgrades ..................................................................... 15 Figure I 0 : Community-wide and Municipal GHG Emissions Sources ................................................................ 18 Figure I I: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 ........................................................................... 19 Figure 12: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 ........................................................................................... 22 Figure 13 : Comparison of BAU Forecast and Reduction Target, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) ............................. 28 Figure 14: Efficient Home Features ............................................................................................................................. 30 Figure 15: Retrofitting Loading Order ........................................................................................................................ 31 Figure 16: Age of Housing Stock, 20 I 0 ...................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 17: Annual Electricity Use per Household, 20 I 0 (kWh) ........................................................................... 34 Figure 18: Annual Electricity Use per Job, 20 I 0 (kWh) ......................................................................................... 34 Figure 19: Municipal Electricity Use by Rate Structure, 2006-20 I 0 ................................................................... 36 Figure 20: Temple City's Energy Efficiency Targets ................................................................................................. 40 Figure 21 : Energy Efficiency Strategy Topics ............................................................................................................ .41 Figure 22: Estimated 2020 kWh Savings by Goai... .................................................................................................. S4 Figure 23 : Estimated 2020 MTC02e Savings by Goai ............................................................................................. SS Figure B-1 : Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector ..................................................................................... 90 Figure B-3: Municipal and Community-Wide GHG Emissions ............................................................................. 94 Figure B-4: Community BAU Emissions by Sector .................................................................................................. 96 Figure B-5 : Municipal BAU Emissions by Sector ...................................................................................................... 97 Figure B-6: GHG Forecast and State-Recommended Reduction Target Summary ...................................... I 02 • CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation AB ABAU AB 32 AB 1493 ADC BAU CAP CAPCOA CARB CEC CEESP CFL CH" co1 C01e CNG CPUC CSI DR EAP EE EECBG EEMIS ELP ESP GHG GWP HFC HVAC iDSM Definition Assembly Bill adjusted business-as-usual Assembly Bill 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Assembly Bill 1493, Clean Car Fuel Standard, also referred to as Pavley bill alternative daily cover business-as-usual climate action plan California Air Pollution Control Officers Association California Air Resources Board California Energy Commission California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan compact fluorescent light methane carbon dioxide carbon dioxide equivalent compressed natural ga s California Public Utilities Commission California Solar Initiative demand response Energy Action Plan energy efficiency Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Energy Enterprise Management Information System Energy Leader Partnership electric service provider greenhouse gas global warming potential hydrofluorocarbons heating, ventilation , and air conditioning integrated demand-side ma nagement CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Abbreviation kW kWh LGOP MT MTC02e N20 PACE PFC PSC RPS RTP SCAG SCE SCREC SF6 SGVCOG SGVEWP VMT Definition kilowatt kilowatt-hour LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Local Government Operations Protocol metric ton metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent nitrous oxide property-assessed clean energy perfluorocarbons Project Steering Committee Renewables Portfol io Standard Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Association of Governments Southern California Edison Southern California Regional Energy Consortium sulfur hexafluoride San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments San Gabriel Valley Energy Wise Partnership vehicle miles traveled CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To support the content found throughout the EAP, several technical appendices have been prepared to provide additional detail and Information regarding GHG reductions and sources. This Plan includes the following appendices: " Glossary -Defines the key terms used throughout the document. " References -Provides a list of c itations and sources used throughout the EAP. " Appendix A : Personal Energy Action Survey-Includes a copy of the survey used to evaluate resident energy efficiency priorities and activities to inform the EAP regarding feasible community actions. " Appendix B: GHG Inventory and Forecast -Technical memorandum about GHG emissions inventory results and methodologies. " Appendix C: GHG Methods and Assumptions Report -Provides a list of the emissions factors utilized in calculation of GHG emissions as well as a summary of the sources and assumptions used to estimate the potential range of kilowatt-hours (kWh) and GHG savings for each policy. " Appendix 0 : Energy Action Plan -Energy Leader Partnership Requirements Checklist CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Chapter I provides a brief overview of the purpose and scope of this EAP and how this Pl a n was created in partnership with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) and Southern California Edison (SCE). The City has prepared this Plan not only to follow the guidance of California's Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (CEESP) but also to identify a clear path to successfully implementing actions, policies, and goals that will achieve the City's reduction targets. This project was funded through the technical assistance program of the CEESP, which aims to provide local governments with expertise and resources to achieve energy efficiency at municipal facilities and throughout the community. In 2009, as part of CEESP implementation, the California Public Utilities Commission authorized SCE to use funding from the electricity public goods charge to complete strategic plan activities focused on energy efficiency. SCE is implementing the "Big Bold '' strategies of the CEESP , and through this process, SCE awarded funding to the SGVCOG to provide funding and technical support for preparation of the Energy Action Plan . In addition to describing the funding source and collaboration involved in creating this Plan, the introduction chapter describes the community outreach conducted to provide input on this Plan . Through the efforts of City staff, the SGVCOG, and the consultant team, a variety of outreach events were completed, as summarized in Figure ES-1 . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " EXECUTIVE SUMMARY sources and represent less than I% of total community GHG em1ss1ons, they are included in this analysis, as the City has a greater ability to influence municipal GHG emissions through changes to City facilities , purchasing policies, or other City-led efforts to reduce GHG emissions within City operations. Figure ES-3: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 (MTC02e) On-Road Transportation 53 % ' Street & Traffic ................. Lighting 3% Direct Access Electricity 2% Waste Off-Road r /''"'r;:�"' Water ... _____ 2% Wastewater <I % -..____ Residential Energy 25% Commercial/ Industrial Energy 9% CI TY OF TEMPLE C I TY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure ES-4: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 (MTC02 e) Outdoor Lighting , 41% " Fleet 7% Equipment 1% Building Energy 18% Employee Commute & r Travel / 9% Government- / Ge nerated Sol id Waste 10% \_Water Pumping 14% Following the developme nt of a baseline GHG emissions inventory, GHG emissions are forecast to 2020 under a business-as-usual (BAU) scenario based on anticipated growth in the number of residents, jobs, and veh icle travel and the effect that growth will have on GHG emissions w ithout political, technical , or social intervention to reduce GHG emissions. Additionally, the impact that state policies or legi s lation will have on local GHG emissions is included in an adjusted-business-as-usual (ABAU) scenario, and the recommended GHG reduction target to comply with Assembly Bill 32 is identified and described in Figure ES-5 and in more detail in Chapter 2. Figure ES-5: Comparison of BAU Forecast and Reduction Target, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) 210 ,000 200,000 190,000 180,000 170,000 160,000 150,000 2006 2010 2015 2020 Baseline --BAU Forecast --GHG Reduction Targ ets --ABAU Fo recast CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 3: ElECTRICITY PROFilE The electricity profile describes the residential and nonresidential as well as municipal electricity use in Temple City. Electricity used in Temple City's homes and businesses is provided by SCE. SCE generates electricity from a mix of nonrenewable sources, such as natural gas and coal, and renewable sources, such as biomass, geothermal, hydroelectric, solar, and wind. Temple City's electricity uses are tied to the built environment, which is predominantly characterized as a residential community. As shown in Figure ES-6, each Temple City household used an average of 6,500 kWh in 2010. This amount is less than the California average of 6,740 kWh and more than the SGVCOG project average of 6 ,300 kWh. Figure ES-6: Annual Average kWh of Electricity Use per Household, 20 I 0 18.000 "C 16,000 0 .c 14,000 41 "' 12,000 :I 0 10,000 :t ... 8 ,000 41 c.. 6,000 ?: 4,000 'ij 'i: 2,000 ..... v .! w .... 0 .c ~ ~ * Regional electricity numbers represent the San G abriel Valley average for a ll 27 cities partici pating in the EAP project. Municipal electricity use is also described in detail in Chapter 3 by depicting the changes in electricity use between the baseline year and 20 I 0 (see Figure ES-7), and identifying the largest electricity uses by account to highlight the energy efficiency actions already completed or under way at City facilities and to identify the largest opportunities for reducing electricity use . ( ITY OF TEMPLE CITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Citywide Lighting upgrades Citywide HVAC control upgrades Citywide Streetlight upgrades LED and other Civic Center high efficiency lighting upgrades LED installation and City Hall replacement, lighting retrofits Installation of window film, City Hall implementation of demand- controlled ventilation Live Oak Vending Community machine controls Center installation Parking Installation of Lots 3,5a, LED lighting Sb, 7a,8a & fixtures 8b Table ES-1: Near-Term Municipal Projects Annual kWh Savings 120,0001 5,0001 120,7001•4 97,0103 34,3603 20,0203 97,0103 13,3703 Savings TBD2 TBD 2 TBD 2 $14,550 $5,150 $3,000 $14,553 $1,910 TBD 2 November 2012 TBD2 November 2012 TBD 2 December 2012 $6,110 TBD2 $2,630 TBD 2 $2,790 TBD 2 $6,111 TBD 2 $720 TBD 2 I The source of this infonnation is the Energy Wise Partnership spreadsheet Funding Opportunities On-bill financing, SCREC, CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CECioans On-bill financing, SCREC, CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CECioans On-bill financing, SCREC,CECioans On-bill financing, SCREC,CECioans On-bill financing, SCREC,CECioans On-bill financing, SCREC,CECioans 2 To be determined. At the time of report preparation, estimated energy and GHG reductions were unavailable. The SGVCOG and SCREC are working to confirm project information. J The source of this infonnation is an audit that the City conducted with Will dan Energy Solutions . ~ The electricity reduction for streetlights assumes that 50% of City-owned streetlights will be upgraded and will achieve 45% energy savings . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTER 1 • CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION This Energy Action Plan (EAP) identifies an overarching vision that captures the City's long-term goals for energy efficiency. The intent of this Plan is to achieve optimal energy performance throughout the community, increasing operational productivity, cost savings, and the quality of life for residents , employees, and business owners. This Pl an also identifies programs to achieve cost savings in City facilities through energy reductions and more efficient maintenance and operational practices . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " CHAPTER1 INTRODUCT ION PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this EAP is to identify the City of Temple City's long-term vision and commitment to achieve ener gy efficiency in the community and in government operations. The rationale for Temple City's energy efficiency efforts includes demonstrating leadership in implementing cost-effective energy efficiency improvements, minimizing costs associated with energy and utilities, and protecting limited energy and natural resources. Local governments pl ay an important role in leading the community by example. This EAP shows the benefits of efficiency that the City will realize in government operations, providing a foundation for more comprehensive community-wide efficiency strategies. Strategies in this EAP provide a path toward optimizing energy use in the city, increasing the quality and comfort of homes and bus inesses, reducing utility costs, and maximizing operational productivity of local businesses. The EAP is a stand-alone document that meets multiple objectives of the City and Southern California Edison (SCE). The EAP supports the City's status in the Energy Leader Partnership (ELP) w ith SCE. In addition, the EAP serves as the equivalent of an e lectricity efficiency chapter of a climate action plan (EECAP). It is designed to integrate into a comprehensive climate action plan when the City's resources suppor t the preparation of a clim ate action plan to address the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electricity, natural gas, waste, transportation, and other sectors. Created in partnership with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) a nd SCE , this EAP identifies municipal and community-wide strategies to achieve the City's long-term electricity efficiency goals . This integration of municipal and community-wide strategies allows the City to lead by example. Specifically, the objectives of this EAP are to: " Create a long-term vision for energy efficiency. " Provide and assess information related to energy use and GHG em issions. " Establish reduction targets for energy efficiency. " Identify goals, policies, and actions to achieve energy reductions. " Provide a framework implementing the identified goals, policies, and actions. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AND THE CALIFORNIA LONG TERM ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGIC PLAN Cal ifornia 's Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (CEESP) is the State's road map for achieving energy efficiency between 2009 and 2020, and beyond . The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) adopted the CEESP in 2008 following a collaborative planning effort of the CPUC, the state's investor-owned utilities, the governor's office , the California Energy Commission (CEC), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and more than 500 individuals and organizations. The CEESP provides a strategic menu list of options that local governments can use to address the "B ig Bo ld" strategies found in the strategic plan. These "Big Bold'' strategies are shown in Figure I . CITY or TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Figure 1: 118ig Bold" Strategies of the CEESP In addition, the CEESP identifies two primary goals that this EAP seeks to achieve: • CEESP Section 12.5 Goal 3: Local governments lead by example with their own facilities and energy usage practices. • CEESP Section 12.5 Goal 4: Local governments lead their commumtres with innovative programs for energy efficiency, sustainability, and climate change. The EAP meets these goals by providing goals, policies, and actions for municipal operations as well as for community-wide activities. The CEESP also identifies a long-term vision and energy efficiency goals for California, as well as outlining specific near-term, mid-term, and long-term implementation strategies to assist each economic sector in achieving its energy efficiency goals. The CPUC identified several policy tools to assist in the market transformation to more energy-efficient products or practices, including: • Customer incentives. • Codes and standards. • Education and information. • Technical assistance. • Emerging technologies. The City prepared this EAP through the technical assistance program of the CEESP, which aims to provide local governments with the technical expertise and financial resources to achieve energy efficiency at municipal facilities and throughout the community. In 2009, , the CPUC authorized SCE to use funding from the electricity public goods charge to complete local strategic plan activities focused on energy efficiency. SCE is implementing the "Big Bold" strategies of the CEESP. Through this process, SCE awarded funding to the SGVCOG and participating cities to provide funding and technical support for preparation of city-specific EAPs through a regional planning process. CITY Of-TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The Scoping Plan also identified a variety of measures, including regulations, incentives, voluntary actions, and market-based approaches, to ach ieve the target reduction. The California Natural Resources Agency has also directed local governments to assess GHG emissions through the California Environmental Quality Act review process. The GHG inventory in this EAP allows the City to identify the local equivalent of the State-recommended reduction target. The EAP also allows the City to understand the GHG mitigation potential of the strategies outlined in this Plan. Based on the funding opportunity provided through the CEESP, the EAP's primary focus is electricity efficiency. While this EAP presents a comprehensive GHG emissions inventory and forecast, unlike more comprehensive climate action plans or GHG reduction strategies, mitigation strategies in the EAP focus only on electricity efficiency. Nonetheless, this Plan lays out Temple City's role in achieving State- recommended GHG reduction targets. CITY PROFILE Setting Temple City, the "Home of the Camellias," was founded in 1921 as the Town of Temple and incorporated as the City of Temple City on May 25, 1960. It is located approximately 13 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. The city is bounded by the communities of Arcadia to the north, San Gabriel to the west, Rosemead to the south, El Monte to the south and east, and unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. Temple City is primarily residential, with diverse architectural styles that reflect the history and development of the city, from bungalows of the 1920s to more modern apartments constructed in the 1970s. Unlike other neighboring cities, no freeways go through the city, but the major thoroughfare, Las Tunas Drive, runs east to west and serves as an important connection within the city. Temple City's other main corridors are Temple City Boulevard and Rosemead Boulevard, along with other avenues such as Camino Real, Lower Azusa Road, Encinita Avenue, Baldwin Avenue, and Santa Anita Avenue. History The city was named in honor of the Temple family, one of the early groups that settled in the San Gabriel Valley area in the mid-l800s. Originally from the East Coast, Pliny Fisk Temple married into the Workman family, whose patriarch was a successful cattle rancher in the San Gabriel Valley and cultivated an expansive garden, vineyard, and ranch. With his father-in-law, William Workman, P. F. Temple worked to expand their land holdings by acquiring adjacent ranchos and subdividing the land for prospective buyers. Workman and Temple invested in railroads, bringing people and resources to the area that would become Temple City, and erected important buildings such as a bank, market, and theater. The son of P. F. Temple, Walter P. Temple, established the town of Temple in the early 1920s and petitioned the railway company to extend its Los Angeles to Alhambra line into Temple, which spurred growth by bringing people and resources to the new town. W . P. Temple envisioned a city where middle-income residents could purchase their own homes, and he proceeded to lay out the foundation of the future Temple City, dividing the area into lots and naming important streets after prominent families. After World War II and the proliferation of automobiles, Temple City, like other towns in the San Gabriel Valley, experienced a population boom that transformed the primarily agricultural town into a bedroom community for the greater Los Angeles area. Commercial development expanded along Las CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " CHAPTER1 INTRODUCTION Ta b le 2: Number and Type of Businesses, 2012 I Type Home-Based Busi ness Services Retail Professional (Office) Restaurants Manufacturing/Who lesale Private Education Auto Repair Nonprofit Car Wash Nursing Motel Tota l 348 190 133 88 58 36 31 16 7 3 2 913 Percentage of Total Number of Licenses 38% 21% 15% 10% 6% 4% 3% 2% 0.8% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 100% Source: City of Temple City and Chamber of Commerce, Facts and Figures, Apri/2012 TEMPLE CITY'S BUll T ENVIRONMENT The C ity of Temple City covers about 4 square miles, with residential land uses covering 89.2% of the land area, commercial land uses accounting for 6.8% of the land area, and other land uses comprising the remaining 4% of land. The City also owns nine public facilities, which include City Hall, the civic center, the live Oak Community Center, an annex, a snack bar, a parks and maintenance building, the Chamber of Commerce building, the city corporation yard, and a housing complex. While the land pattern of neighboring cities reflects building construction by a single developer, the residences from Temple City's first decades are not clustered in entire tracts but rather are scattered throughout the city . The San Gabriel Valley in the early 20th century was considered an agricu ltural outpost where individual fami lies cultivated crops an d raise d animals on their separated lots. Ma ny o f t he Craftsman-style bunga lows from the 192 0s sti ll remain in Temple C ity and are interspersed in neighborhoods with homes built in the 1960s and '70s. Instead of tract development on the fringes of town, Temple City has continued its earlier pattern of infill development as it moves toward necessary buildout. As the population increased in the San Gabriel Valley since the 1970s, Temple City experienced new development pressures. Since the city had been mostly developed, developers began to build multi-story apartment buildings with underground parking to increase densities. The trend of infill development, particularly on arterial streets, has continued as single-family residences are demolished and replaced with higher-density buildings. At the same time, larger homes have become more popular, and it is common for previously modest homes to be renovated to become multi-story homes covering a larger percentage of the lot. Currently, about 88% of the total housing units in Temple City are single-family residences, while 12% of the total housing units are multi-family structures . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " CHAPTER1 INTRODUCTION analyze the relevant energy and GHG data prior to developi ng a n d implementing strategies to improve energy efficiency and reduce GHG emissions. The EAP's outreach process engaged City s t aff and comm un ity members in the identific ation and r efinement of electricity efficiency is su e s and s t rategie s . The goal of the outreach process was to gather informa tion to assist City staff in making better decisions about effective local strategies for electricity e fficiency. The outreach process is also d esigned to provide community members with a better understa nding of the opportunities for energy efficie n cy in their community. C ity staff fa cilitated addition al public engagement t hrough targeted outreach and a presentation to the City Council. Development of the EAP relied on a multi-pronged outreach and participation strategy in volving City staff, public stakeholders (res idents, employees. and business owners), and guidance from a regional Project Steering Committee (PSC). Figure 5: The EAP Planning Process 1. Getting Started 2. Collect and Assess Energy Use and GHG Emissions 3. Identify Goal s and Strategies ' 4. Develop Energy Efficiency � , Climate Action .Pian ' \. . -. 5. Adopt and Implement Plan PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE " Assem bl e City En ergy Action T earn " Id e nti fy da ta needs a nd stake ho ld e r group s " Re que st, co ll ect, a nd a na lyze data foll owi ng protoco ls " Forecast e mi ss ions and set re duction targets " Res ults of in ve ntory a nd forecast " Com munity va lu es a nd goa ls " Options to re du ce e ne rgy use " Cos ts and benefits of each acti o n " Fun d and imp le ment actions " Revi e w prog ress tow ard goals Along with staff representing other Sa n Ga briel Valley cities taking part in the regiona l EAP project, the City staff participated in a regional PSC. The committee included representatives from a ll 27 cities participating in the project. The pu r pose of the PSC is to confirm a regional approach to EAP development, guide the project, sha re best practices among jurisdictions, and s upport tailo red, local EAPs . The PSC convened app roximately once a month from June 20 I J through September 20 12 . During PSC meetings, representatives from SGVCOG staff and the technical consultant project team facilitated discussions and presentations to review options to achi e ve electricity efficiency. PSC members regularly voted on topics through a n instant polling tool, Turn ing Point, to provide input on a va riety of topics, including the regional framework, GHG data collection process, GHG scopes and sources, reduction policies and programs, and engagement options fo r the EAPs . The polling tool coll e cted staff responses, which were used to inform the recommen dations that the project team used to prepare this EAP. Other PSC topics included options t o conduct public outr each and engage City staff . PSC members also presented case studies, sharing success stories and lessons learne d from project imp lementation . Throughout all steps of the process, the City has facil itated ongoing outreach and engagement efforts . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION OUTREACH TO CITY STAFF Temple City convened staff with expertise in maintenance and facilities management for a staff workshop to discuss energy efficiency in City facilities. The workshops gave staff members the opportunity to learn about the Energy Action Plan project and to provide input about opportunities to reduce energy use. A total of approximately 25-30 City employees were in attendance between the two workshops. Participants had the opportunity to provide input on energy-saving opportunities through a facilitated discussion. To close each workshop, participants were asked to identify their top three priorities for ideas that would provide the best opportunities to reduce energy use in Temple City. Results of the prioritization exercise included opportunities for: • HVAC improvements in City Hall • Passive climate control in City Hall • HVAC improvements in the Live Oak Community Center Feedback from staff workshops and other meetings with City staff helped to inform the development of municipal projects for the Energy Action Plan. WORKSHOPS AND COMMUNITY EVENTS Public participation is important to developing an EAP, because it builds local capacity and momentum for project implementation. Public participation for Temple City's EAP was designed to engage key stakeholders at many levels. Stakeholders include community members. advocates, elected officials, and City staff. As a first step, the project team worked with the City project lead to develop a customized outreach strategy. Outreach efforts allowed the City to share ideas, collect input, and assess stakeholder preferences. A summary of outreach events is shown in Figure 6. Figure 6: Summary of Outreach Events In addition to supporting development of the EAP, these events provided opportunities to educate the community about electricity use and efficiency opportunities. Outreach efforts helped the community to think about strategies to reduce electricity use and to improve the quality of their homes and businesses. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTE.H 2 • CHAPTER 2: GHG INVENTORY AND fORECAST INVENTORY AND FORECASTING PURPOSE This greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory and forecast (Inventory) provides a detailed summary of community-wide and municipal GHG emissions. This information is used to create reduction strategies in the City of Temple City's Energy Action Plan (EAP). The Inventory also provides a detailed summary of GHG emissions, which can be used as a foundation for future climate action planning projects. Specifically, the GHG Inventory: • Presents GHG emissions from community-wide and municipal activities in calendar year 2006. • Provides a snapshot of total GHGs and electricity-specific emissions from community-wide and municipal activities in calendar year 20 I 0. • Forecasts how community-wide total emissions and electricity-specific em1ss1ons will increase by 2020 if no behavioral or regulatory changes are made (known as a business-as- usual scenario). • Adjusts the GHG forecasts to account for reduction efforts mandated by the State of California, such as new energy efficiency and vehicle standards. • Provides City staff, decision-makers, and stakeholders with adequate information to direct development of this EAP and to establish GHG emissions reduction and energy efficiency targets. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Figure 11: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 On-Road Transportation 53% Direct Access Electricity 2% Waste Off-Road 3% Equipment /1% Water .n..-----2% Commercial/ Industrial Energy 9% Wastewater <I % Residential Energy 25% Table 3: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 (MTC02e) Sector Percentage of Total Residential Energy 47,140 25% Commercial/Industrial Energy 16,850 9% Direct Access Electricity 3,240 2% Street & Traffic Lighting 5,970 3% On-Road Transportation 98,830 53% Community-Generated Waste 6,270 3% Off-Road Equipment 2,720 lo/o Water 4,410 2% Wastewater 890 <1% Total * 186,320 100% * Due to rounding, the total may not equal the sum of component parts. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Ill " CHAPTER 2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST 2010 COMMUNITY EMISSIONS UPDATE Activity data for 20 I 0 was a va ilable for many community sectors , including energy, transportation, waste, off-road equ ipment, water, a nd wastewater. This information has been translated into GHG emissions for Temple City and all other participating cities and w ill serve as a common benchmark that will allow for accurate comparison between all cities in the San Gabriel Va lley participating in the EAP process. This 20 I 0 interim inventory will also help cities track GHG and energy reductions from programs implemented since the baseline year. Table 4 summarizes a ctivity data for 2010 and compares emissions from baseline and 2010 for the community of Temple City. Se ctors that showed a d e crease in emissions from 2006 to 20 I 0 include r esidentia l electricity, commercial/industrial electricity and natural gas, d irect access electricity, on-road transportation, solid waste and transformed waste, off-road construction equipment, water, and wastewater. The only sector that resulted in increased emissions is alternative daily cover, also known as green waste. Sectors that exhibited no change from 2006 to 20 I 0 in GHG emissions were residential natural gas , street and traffic lighting, and off-road lawn and garden equipment. Proxy data was used to estimate residentia l natural gas for 2006 , due to the unavailability of data. Emissions from the community are estimated at 178,420 MTC02e , 4% below the baseline. Table 4: Comparison of Activity Data and GHG Emissions, 2006-2010 Residential 74,949,540 67,944,710 -9% kWh 21 ,920 19,560 -11 % Electricity Residential 4,740,830* 4,740,830 Oo/o Therms 25,220 25,220 Oo/o Natural Gas Commercial/ Industrial 39,524,660 38,261,220 -3 % kWh 11 ,560 11,010 -5% Electricity Commercial/ Industrial Natural 994,150 974,150 -2% Therms 5,290 5,180 -2% Gas Direct Access 8,002,070 5,842,750 -27% kWh 3,240 2,450 -24% Electricity St reet & Traffic 20,417,790 20,741 ,030 2% kWh 5,970 5,970 0% Lighting On-Road 185,720,500 187,378,970 1% VMT 98,830 97,000 -2% Transportation Waste -Solid 29,300 23,160 -21 % Tons of 5,390 4,310 -20% Waste Waste Waste -Green 4,770 6,300 32% Tons of 740 980 32% Waste ADC CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " CHAPTER 2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Figure 12: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 Outdoor Light ing --.... 41 % " Fleet 7% Equipment 1% Building Energy 18% Employee Commute& r Travel / 9% Government- / Generated Sol id W aste 10 % \_Water Pumping 14% Table 5: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector, 2006 (MTC02e) Sector Percentage of Total Building Energy 160 18% Off-Road Equipment 10 1% Fleet 60 7% Lighting 360 41 % Employee Commute and Travel 80 9% Government-Generated Solid Waste 90 10% Water Pumping 120 14% Total * 880 100% * Due to rounding, th e total may not equal th e sum of component parts . C I TY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST BUSINESS-AS-USUAL GHG EMISSIONS FORECAST Table 6 lists the various growth indicators and sources used in the forecasting of Temple City's community-wide emissions. For a detailed explanation of indicator methods for all sectors, see Appendix B. Future energy use (including electricity) was forecast by assuming that the energy consumption per household and per job would stay roughly the same over time. For residential energy use, household growth rates are calculated and multiplied by the per-household energy use rate. Similarly. for commercial and industrial energy use, emissions are assumed to grow with the number of jobs. Table 6: Business-as-Usual Forecasting Indicators, 2006-2020 • Jobs Service Population (Residents +Jobs) Households Annual VMT Emissions Sector Commercial/ Industrial Energy Solid Waste, Water, Wastewater Residential Energy, Off- Road Equipment On-Road Transportation 5 ,850 6,700 41,180 42,260 11,520 11,610 528,570 533,240 COMMUNITY BUSINESS-AS-USUAL FORECAST 7,000 43,900 12,300 545,100 Percentage Change, 2006-2020 20% 7% 7% 3% Sources 2010 Census, SCAG 2012 RTP,SCAG 2003 RTP 2010 Census, SCAG 2012 RTP 20 1 0 Census, SCAG 2012 RTP Fehr & Peers, SCAG 2003 RTP Table 7 summarizes the growth forecast of GHG emissions by activity sector without any actions or policies in place to reduce GHG emissions. Under the BAU growth scenario, emissions are estimated to grow by 7% in 2020 to 199,350 MTC02e. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY El " CHAPTER 2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Table 7: Comparison of Community-Wide BAU Forecasts by Sector, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) Sector Residential Energy 47,140 Commercial/Industrial Energy 16,850 Direct Access Electricity 3,240 Street & Traffic Lighting 5,970 On-Road Transportation 98,830 Waste 6,270 Off-Road Equipment 2,720 Water 4,410 Wastewater 890 Total * 186,320 Percentage Change from 2006 * Due t o rounding, the total may not equal the sum of component parts. MUNICIPAL BUSINESS-AS-USUAL FORECAST 44,780 16,190 2,450 5,970 97,000 5,330 1,460 4 ,360 880 178,420 -4% 50,350 20,170 3,880 5,970 101,920 6,690 4,750 4,700 950 199,3 50 7% Percentage Change, 2006-2020 7% 20% 20% Oo/o 3% 7% 75% 7% 7% 7% In 2020, the City is anticipated to have a I% increase in GHG emissions from the baseline year as shown in Table 8. Indicators such as building area, community-wide employment, City employment, and service population are applied to the baseline data for the municipal BAU forecast. Table 8: Comparison of Municipal BAU Forecasts by Sector, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) Sector 2020 Percentage MTCO Change, 2 e 2006-2020 Building Energy 160 180 160 0% Off-Road Equipment 10 10 10 Oo/o Fleet 60 60 60 0% Lighting 360 360 360 0% Water 120 110 130 8% Employee Commute & Travel 80 80 80 Oo/o Government-Generated Solid Waste 90 90 90 Oo/o Total* 880 890 890 1% Percentage Change from 2006 1% 1% " Due to rounding, the total may not equal th e sum of component parts . CITY OF HMPLE CITY CHAPTER2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST STATE ADJUSTMENTS TO BUSINESS-AS-USUAL (ABAU) FORECAST State Reductions The State has been a proactive force in reducing GHG emissions. Regulat ions affecting vehicle standards, building standards, and the renewable energy content of electricity will reduce GHG levels in the city. The state actions listed below are incorporated into the BAU forecast to create a more realistic estimate of Temple City's future emissions. For a detailed description of these actions, see Appendix B. Clean Car Fuel Standard (Assembly Bill (AB) 1493 -Pavley). Requires carmakers to reduce GHG emissions from new passenger cars and light trucks beginning in 20 I I . CARB anticipates that the Pavley standards will reduce GHG emissions from California passenger vehicles by approximately 22% of emissions in 20 12 and by about 30% of emissions in 2016. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). Requires utility providers to increase the portion of energy that comes from renewable sources to 20% by 20 I 0 and to 33% by 2020. Due to potential implementation issues, the ABAU forecast assumes that energy providers will achieve a minimum 28% renewable portfolio by 2020. California Building Code (Title 24, CALGreen). Requires each new building constructed in California to incorporate direct electricity, natural gas, and water savings . California Solar Initiative (CSI). Provides cash rebates for the installation of an electric solar panel system. Community ABAU Forecast All of the state programs highlighted above are included in the community-wide ABAU forecast. As shown in Table 9 and Table I 0, these state reduction efforts are anticipated to reduce emissions by 23,51 0 MTC02e in 2020 . The majority of these reductions are from the Pavley standards and the RPS . In comparison to the BAU scenario, Table I 0 shows 2020 emissions with state reduction measures are 6% below baseline 2006 levels rather than 7% above baseline 2006 levels. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY El " CHAPTER 2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Table 9: Impact of State Reductions on Community Emissions, 2020 (MTC02e) State Reductions Summary Pavley Reductions RPS Reductions CA Building Code Reductions CSI Reductions Tota l St ate Reductions* 2020 MTCO,e -15,730 -6,270 -1,430 -90 -23,510 * Due to rounding, the total may not equal the sum of component parts. Table 10: Community Adjusted BAU Forecast, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) State Reductions Summary Growth Projection 186,320 Total State Reductions Adjusted BAU Forecast (2020)* 186,320 Percentage Change from 2006 * Du e to rounding, th e total may not eq ual the su m of component parts . Municipal ABAU Forecast 178,420 178,420 -4% 2020 MTCO ,e 199,350 -2 3,510 175,840 -6% Only certain state reduction programs affect the municipal BAU forecast. These include the RPS and the Pavley standards . Since no new buildings are planned to be built. updates to the California Building Code Standards, s uch a s Title 24, and the CSI are not applicable to Temple City and are not quantified. Table II shows the effect of the included state reduction effortS, and Table 12 shows how these efforts change the BAU emissions. Em is sions are reduced by 90 MTC02e in 2020 solely from the RPS and Pavley standa rds. With state reduction measures, 2020 emissions are 9% below baseline 2006 levels compared to I % above baseline 2006 levels in the BAU scenario . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER2 GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Table 11: Impact of State Reductions on Municipal Emissions, 2020 (MTC02e) State Reductions Summary Pavley Reductions RPS Reductions CA Building Code Reductions CSI Reductions Total State Reductions -20 -70 0 0 -90 Table 12: Municipal ABAU Forecast, 2006-2020 (MTC02e) State Reductions Summary Growth Projection Total State Reductions Adjusted BAU Forecast (2020)* Percentage Change from 2006 880 880 Oo/o * Due to rounding, the total may not equal the sum of component parts. REDUCTION TARGETS 890 890 1% 890 -90 800 -9% As previously mentioned, this EAP can serve as the foundation for future climate action planning projects. Community-wide GHG reduction targets have been included as an informational item. While this overall GHG emissions reduction target was consulted when establishing community-wide and municipal electricity reduction targets, the two are not linked directly. For electricity-specific community-wide reduction goals, see Chapter 4 . State Recommended 2020 Reduction Targets AB 32 recommends that local governments adopt a GHG reduction target of 15% below baseline levels by 2020. The State has not adopted GHG reduction targets beyond 2020; however, in 2005, then- Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-3-05 that created a goal to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and to 80% of emissions below 1990 levels by 2050. While not legislatively mandated, it is anticipated that the State will adopt targets similar to those included in Executive Order S-3-05 after the State's achievement of the 2020 target can be better evaluated. As shown in Table 13 and Figure 13, the City would need to facilitate a reduction in emissions of 17,470 MTC02e to meet the State-recommended AB 32 Scoping Plan goal of 15% below baseline levels by 2020. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Iii CHAPTE.H 3 • INTRODUCTION Electricity used in Temple City's homes and businesses is provided by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE generates electricity from a mix of nonrenewable sources, such as natural gas and coal, and renewable sources, such as biomass, geothermal, hydroelectric, solar, and wind . SCE operates the Big Creek Hydroelectric Plant and San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in the region . CITY OF TEMPLE C IT Y Ill CHAPTER 3 ELECTRICITY PROFILE The amount of electricity used to power homes and businesses determines how much power SCE needs to generate and the quantity of GHGs emitted. If the energy needed for daily activities is decreased, reductions can be achieved in the amount of electricity SCE needs to generate and transmit. In addition , the GHGs associated with electricity generation would decrease. The most common uses of electricity are for lighting and heating/cooling buildings , for powering appliances such as refrigerators. computers, and washing machines, and for pumping water around the city and into homes or to treatment plants. An example of a home with energy-efficient features is shown in Figure 14. Oat for Actl•nsfor E'••r.t-Y Con,~n 1. Turnofflightr...,.n nc<in.- 2. Unflu3 app!i>nao</oloctrcnr .. 3. Rodto:l ""'of doelranic •FPii>ncos ~. lYA birds. Into mol or.....-nol <hodos , o r o.srt~hs to rnhor "f»l hiat Figure 14: Efficient Home Features ACTI VmES YOU CAN DO TO RED UCE ENERGY USE. (notgyf"'P--•ou s. P.cploao ddor lghtbulbo wilh ln"9)"offi<iinl bubs 0. AopboooFPiiarr...,doelrOnics whh..,..gy-olliciont modo~> 7. Roploca hootilglvomillticrVoirconditi:>ningll'l~ ond /et wawhutarw~ontltg)•<lliciinlmodol e. lnSialls""-aoaii'OI<towloctandchangowator r«T~pcmur~ 9. usc. .. rublo spaod pool F""P 10. lnstJfl sltylightr.,d/orfightsh<l..,tD mnimito M!Irrallighting Who~ H011o.row.c. Strotog IOJ 11. ln:ublo mia. WJIIs,onci'et he<''"* pipcos 12. Upg11<io llo m""' highly insubting,ho>t-t;.o.,;rd- ll. Soalairand dua IGOlcs 1"' I....UII m:nicn-r rghting llo li!llt IICOS only.., .... ; ..... TS. U"'coolrod ....... riolsor hc.t·rsli~plinuto""'Uoo building hoot 1C. Aont ,_ ond ""9ftltion 10 cool tho buldi>g EVEN M ORE WAYS YOU CAN GREEN YO UR HOME OR BUSINESS Source: PMC 2012 w-..s ..... 17. U..low&w...,_h~undtolots II. Lord sapo~ ltCU9ht-tolorJnt pbms t t . Usa dripin'igatOn or odtct w.rw-mnloiC'Vi'-tg bMsapo irriptOn ~ 20. Cap11.1FGRir'NQtwlndstu•on"1ic,Qtow:nerl:n:fs~•M:S; THE ELECTRICITY REDUCTION LOADING ORDER Warto R.diKtloo l l . Minimillo-sootto1holandRI ll. Rocydo/r...,.,..,.riols ll. U>mpootorg111ic_,. ~ lk•)<U-• h""""goNro!Cdcosrpcctintho y.>ld GHGs from electricity use can be reduced, primarily through increasing conservation (i.e., avoiding using electricity) and improving efficiency (i.e ., using less electricity for the same activity) when conservation cannot be realized. Common conservation practices include unplugging appliances and electronics when not in use and turning off lights during the day or when the room is empty. Increasing energy efficiency means replacing incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent lights and inefficient or older models of appliances and electronics with new, preferably Energy Star (or other efficiency label) models in order to use less energy when it is necessary. Using small renewable solar panels can also reduce demand from SCE for daily electricity use. Reductions in electricity used for water pumping in the community can be achieved by using less water for irrigation and other household uses. More efficient toilets, showerheads, faucets , and drip irrigation systems can help conserve water. These are just some examples of energy efficiency and conservation . CITY O F HMPLE CITY El CHAPTER 3 ELECTRICITY PROFILE Temple City's housing stock, as shown in Table 14 , is characterized by a high proportion of single- family resi dential homes. Of the total II ,764 estimated housing units, approximately 88% of the units are single-family housing units (detached and attached) an d only 12% of the units are multi -fa mily housing units (including mobile homes). According to the most recent US Census (20 I 0), there are a total of II ,606 occupied housing units, of which 7,453 units are owner-occupied . Owner-occupied households typically have a higher level of interest in completing home upgrades, since owners directly benefit from lowered utility bills and increased property value s from efficiency improvements. Table 14: H o using Units by Type, 2010 Housing Typ e I 1-unit, detached 1-unit, attached Total (Single-Family) 2 units 3 or4 units 5 to 9 units 1 0 to 19 units 20 or more units Mobile home Total (Multi-Family) Total Housing Units . Percentage Numb e r of Umts f T 1 o ota 9,481 81 % 864 7% 10,345 88% 101 1% 234 2% 263 2% 444 4% 273 2% 104 1% 1,419 12% 11,764 100% Source: US Census 2010. DP-04:Se/eaed Housing Charaaeristics, 2006-2010 ACS Estimate.s Similar to other older cities in the San Gabriel Valley settled in the late l91h century, Temple City's built environment reflects the heritage that anchors the city's character today. As Figure 16 indicates, about 83% of Temple City's homes were built in 1979 or before. Homes that are more than 30 years old typically require major repairs or renovations , so a large percentage of Temple City's housing stock could benefit greatly from appliance upgrades and infrastructure rehabilitation to minimize energy use. The aging residential sector is the single highest electricity consumer in the city, suggesting older homes should be targeted in the energy efficiency strategy in Chapter 4 . Additionally, while 88% of housing stock is single-family-occupied, only 62% of the housing stock is owner-occupied. Rental housing requires a specific approach to a residential energy efficiency strategy. Multi-family residences often provide significant energy savings opportunities but might be challenging to target through traditional energy efficiency incentive programs. This is a result of "split incentive," a problem whereby the landlord has no incentive to help tenants upgrade their space or c reate efficiencies, because the tenant sees all the benefit. C lTV OF TCM PLE CITY CHAPTER 3 ELECTRICITY PROFILE MUNICIPAL ELECTRICITY USES 2006 Electricity Usage In 2006, the City of Temple City used 1,946,590 kWh of electricity. Table IS shows the total amount used by each subcategory. i.e . buildings and facilities, public lighting and water pumping. In the buildings and facilities sector, the two rate classes are non-demand rated (GS-1) and demand rated (GS-2). In 2006, 273,060 kWh, or 78%, of the City's building-and facility-related electricity use fell into the demand rated group. In contrast, the non-demand rated accounts totaled 77,390 kWh, or about 22% of the total kWh from GS -1 and GS-2 accounts. There are four types of rate classes in the public lighting category: SCE-owned streetlights (LS-I), unmetered City-owned streetlights (LS-2), metered City- owned streetlights (LS-3), traffic signals and controllers (TC-1 ), and outdoor area lighting (OL-1 ). Outdoor area lighting includes metered lighting for purposes other than street and highway lighting, such as parking lots, decorative areas, and sports and recreation areas. Only one water pumping rate code was used in 2006 (TOU-PA-B) and accounted for 397,740 kWh of electricity use. Table 1 S: City of Temple City, Municipal Electricity Use, 2006 Buildings & Facilities Non-Demand Rated (GS-1) Demand Rated {GS-2) Total Buildings & Facilities Lighting SCE Streetlights (LS-1) Unmetered City Streetlights (LS-2) Metered City Streetlights (LS-3) Traffic Lights (TC-1) Outdoor Lighting (OL-1) Total Lighting Water Time-of-Use (TOU-PA-B) Total Water TOTAL All2006 Municipal Accounts 2006 Annual kWh 77,390 273,060 350,450 2006 Annual kWh 643,870 138,000 326,270 88,990 1,270 1,198,400 2006 Annual kWh 397,740 397,740 1,946,590 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY %of Buildings and Facilities 22% 78% 100% %of Lighting 54% 12% 27% 7% 0% 100% %of Water 100% 100% El CHAPTER 3 ELECTRICITY PROFILE 2010 Electricity Usage The goal of identifying baseline and current year energy use is to better understand how Temple City uses electricity and find opportunities to further reduce energy use at City facilities . Figure 19 compares the City's 2006 electricity use to 20 I 0 data and provides a breakdown of the types of activities for which that electricity was used. Between 2006 and 20 I 0, the municipal electricity use increased approximately 5% from 1,946,590 kWh to 2,041,700 kWh . Electricity used for water pumping decreased 7% overall in 20 I 0. Building and facility electricity use increased 13% while the largest user, public light ing, increased by 6% in the same period. Figure 19: Municipal Electricity Use by Rate Structure, 2006-2010 • Time-of-Use (TOU-PA-8) 2006 Water l 1,946,590 ~kWh 2006 Buildings & Facilities Non-Demand Rated (GS-1) 22°/o • Demand Rated (GS-2)78% 2006 Public Lighting • SCE StreeUights (LS-1)54% • Unmelered City Streetlights (LS -2) .IJ.\i.red cuy Streetlights (LS-3) •Tl.i'11ic ligh ts (TC-1) 7% Outdoor Ugh ling (OL-1) <1% 2010 Electricity Use 2010Water • Time-of-Use (TOU-PA-8) 99.6% • Demand Rated (PA-2) <1% 2010 Buildings & Facilities Non-Demand Rated (GS ·1) 27% •De mand Rated (GS ·2) 73% 2010 Public Lighting • SCE Streetlights (LS-1)56% • Unmetered Ci1y Streeltights (LS-2) •lte\~red Clly Streeltlghts (LS-3) • rra'fltc Lights (TC-1) 9% Outdoor Lighting (Ol-1) <1 % The top ten municipal electricity users in 2006 and 20 I 0 are listed in Table 16 . Street and traffic lighting make up four of the top ten electricity users with SCE-owned streetlights being the largest overall user. The second largest user is a water pumping account (TOU-PA-B) located at 10144 Bogue Street, or Live Oak Park. The City Hall Complex, i.e ., City Hall, Council Chambers, and Animal Control, is the fourth largest electricity user and had a 6% decrease in use from 2006 to 20 I 0 . CITY OF TEMPLC CITY CHAPTER4 • CHAPTER 4: ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY REDUCTION TARGETS The City of Temple City has identified key energy efficiency targets that support the goals of the Energy Leader Partnership (ELP) and local planning priorities. Consistent with the targets of the California Public Utility Commission's California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (CEESP), this Plan focuses on electricity efficiency. Electricity efficiency also provides the added benefit of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY El CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY • Implementation Action: An action, procedure. program, or strategy to achieve the electricity reductions of a policy. Action items provide interim steps or supporting strategies and the range of opportunities to increase the electricity reduction potential of a policy. Figure 21: Energy Efficiency Strategy Topics Policy Criteria and Evaluation Each policy is assessed for its reduction of electricity use in government operations or community activities . In addition to electricity reductions, this EAP also identifies responsibility for implementation and additional benefits, or co-benefits, resulting from the implementation of each policy. This assessment recognizes the broad value of electricity efficiency for the community and the City ofT emple City. Not only will electricity efficiency actions reduce utility bills , but they also provide an opportunity to improve the quality homes and businesses, increase property values, improve the indoor comfort of buildings, and reduce ongoing maintenance costs. Actions in City facilities also fulfill the City's requirements for participation in the ELP model, helping to qualify the City for additional financial incentives from Southern California Edison (SCE). Electricity efficiency results from a change in operation, activity, or efficiency. In general, there are three primary methods for reducing electricity-related GHG emissions: (I) conservation, (2) greater efficiency, and (3) change in energy source. Each policy in this chapter presents the following information: • GHG reduction estimates, presented in ranges, for the year 2020 . • Kilowatt-hours (kWh) reduction estimates, presented in ranges, for the year 2020. • Co-benefits that will probably occur through the implementation of each policy or action. The baseline GHG inventory and forecast serve as the foundation for quantifying the City's policies. Activity data from the inventory. kWh of electricity, is combined with the performance targets and indicators identified in this EAP to calculate the range of potential reduction benefit for each policy. This approach ensures that the city's electricity reductions are tied to the baseline and anticipated uses that CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTER 4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY will occur in Temple City. Details on the assumptions, methods, and citations used in the electricity reduction quantifications can be found in Appendix C. COMMUNITY STRATEGIES GOAL 1: ACHIEVE MAXIMUM ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF THE CITY'S EXISTING HOUS ING STOCK AND REDUCE HOUSEHOLD ENERGY COSTS. POLICY 1.1: PROMOTE ENERGY CONSERVATION IN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES THROUGH EDUCATION AND OUTREACH. Actions: • Partner with commun ity groups to identify culture- specific approaches to communicating the benefits of energy conservation and to promote the policies in this Energy Action Plan . • Partner with the Temple City Unified School District to highlight the di strict's recent sustainability efforts, and to integrate energy efficiency curriculum and projects in educational and after-school programs. • Continue electr icity efficiency education and outreach with the Energy Leader Partnership at comm un ity events. • Update the City's website to encourage resident participation in utility-provided smart meter monitoring programs. POLICY 1.1 2020 I<Wh Reduction: 374,750-899,390 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 100-230 Co-Benefits: Reduces Peak Energy Demand, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Community Education • Lead a comparative information-based outreach campaign that allows residents to evaluate their current electricity use against city and historic averages. Consider including incentives based on performance. • Form a Platinum Energy Leader program, allowing City staff to volunteer to conduct educational outreach at schools, special community events, and local community groups. POLICY 1.2: REDUCE ENERGY USE AND PLUG LOAD DEMAND THROUGH UPGRADES TO HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENT. POLICY 1.2 2020 I<Wh Reduction: 374,060-842,930 Actions: • Promote upgrades of residential and recreational pool pumps to more efficient, variable-speed pump models. • Promote existing energy efficiency rebate offerings for appliances, refrigeration units, heating and ventilation equipment, and lighting fixtures as programs become available , including rebates from the California Energy CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 100-220 Co-Benefits: Reduces Peak Energy Demand, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Local Economy & Job Creation CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY Comm ission and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. • Promote participation in in-home monitoring programs provided by SCE and the use of smart-grid-integrated appliances . • Consider the creation of a municipal revolving loan fund for a community appliance trade-in rebate program. POLICY 1.3: SUPPORT OWNER-OCCUPIED WHOLE HOUSE RENOVATIONS THAT REDUCE ENERGY USE AND IMPROVE THERMAL COMFORT OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS. Actions: • Encourage residents to participate in SCE -funded retrofit programs such as Energy Upgrade California. • Explore creation of a municipal revolving loan program that could provide small loans to local homeowners to assist them with the cost of energy efficiency improvements. • Consider funding residential energy audits for representative building types in mature neighborhoods to highlight and promote energy efficiency opportunities. • Include energy-efficient retrofit as an eligible improvement type in the City of Temple City Home Improvement Program. POLICY 1.3 2020 kWh Reduction: I ,540,170-8.422.780 2020 MTC0 2e Reduction: 400-2,160 Co-Benefits: Improves Indoor Environmental Quality. Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Local Economy & Job Creation POLICY 1.4: SUPPORT RENOVATIONS THAT REDUCE ENERGY USE AND IMPROVE THERMAL COMFORT IN EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY UNITS AND BUILDINGS. Actions: • Work with property management agencies and condominium homeowner associations to encourage retrofits. Promote retrofits through targeted outreach to the city's affordable and senior housing projects. • Work with Southern California Edison and the Energy Leader Partnership to promote free to low-cost retrofit opportunities to property owners of multi-family apartment buildings to improve the community's multi - family housing stock. • Identify and promote affordable tenant improvement opportunities such as lighting upgrades. • Create a priority list of the largest multi-family residential properties and conduct targeted outreach. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY POLICY 1.4 2020 kWh Reduction: 209,130-331,120 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 50-90 Co-Benefits: Improves Indoor Environmental Quality, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Local Economy & Job Creation CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY POLICY 1.5: ENCOURAGE ENERGY -EFFICIENT IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY'S HISTORIC HOUSING STOCK. Actions: • Update the City's Energy Efficiency website and prepare brochures to share inform ation r egarding energy efficiency upgrades and retrofits a ppropriate for historic buildings. • Consider creation of a p ilot program to fund e n ergy audits and identify appropriate energy efficiency upgrades for the city's historic s tyles , includ ing C rafts man, Spani s h Colonial Revival , Tudor Rev ival , Fr ench Revolution , Stream line Moderne, and Mid-Century Modern. POLICY 1.5 2020 kWh Reduction: Supportive 2020 MTC02e Reduction: Supportive Co-Benefits: Provides Permanent Energy Reduction. Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Community Education GOAL 2: OPTIMIZE BUSINESS ENERGY USE, COST COMPETITIVENESS, AND OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES. POLICY 2.1: EDUCATE TEMPLE CITY'S BUSINESSES ABOUT OPPORTUNITIES TO CONSERVE ENERGY USE AND REDUCE COSTS THROUGH BEHAVIORAL CHANGES IN DAILY OPERATIONS. Actions: • Consider language-and culture-sensitive/specific outreach programs. • Highlight energy-efficient behavioral changes impl e mented by local businesses as case studies for the community on the City's website and at permit counters. Partner with the Temple City Chamber of Commerce to highlight available conservation actions and energy efficiency programs to business and property owners. • Encourage building and facility managers to participate in energy-monitoring programs that inform energy use decisions and reduce peak energy demand, such as SCE's Demand Response Program. • Educate business owners about nonresidential energy use disclosure requirements (Assembly Bill I I 03). • CITY OF TEMPLE C IT Y POLICY 2.1 2020 kWh Reduction: Supportive 2020 MTC02 e Reduction: Supportive Co-Benefits: Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Community Education CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY POLICY 2.2: SUPPORT THE USE OF ENERGY -EFFICIENT APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENT IN LEASED AND OWNER-OCCUPIED BUSINESSES. Actions: • Promote rebates for manufacturing and commercial activ ities, including SCE rebates through the Energy Management Solutions Program for cooking and refrigeration appliances , lighting, and manufacturing equipment. • Create a standardized tenant improvement checklist and informational materials to address and encourage the installation of Energy Star and/or smart-grid-integrated appliances in nonresidential development. POLICY 2.2 2020 kWh Reduction: I .347,960-2,396,370 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 370-660 Co-Benefits: Provides Permanent Energy Reduction, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs POLICY 2.3: FACILITATE RETROFITS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING STOCK. Actions: • Work with Los Angeles County and other regional public or private entities to create a revolving loan fund to support nonresidential retrofits . • Partner with the Temple City Chamber of Commerce to identify local community banks to promote and support low-interest energy efficiency loans or financing programs for nonresidential energy efficiency retrofits. • Educate property and business owners about feasible options for retrofit-specific energy efficiency financing, including Los Angeles County Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing, integration of energy efficiency retrofit projects into capital lease structures, and mortgage refinancing. POLICY 2.3 2020 kWh Reduction: I ,424.350-3,572.550 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 390-980 Co-Benefits: Improves Indoor Environmental Quality. Reduces Monthly Utility Costs • Develop a shared landlord-tenant program to support the financing of energy efficiency retrofits to renter-occupied buildings. • Distribute informational packet about nonresidential financing and opportunities in business license application and renewal interactions. • Educate nonresidential building owners about the savings potential from retrocommissioning, retrofits, and deep retrofits. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY GOAL 3: INTEGRATE ENERGY-EFFICIENT FEATURES INTO NEW BUILDINGS AND REMODELS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING COMMUNITY CHARACTER. POLICY 3.1: SUPPORT THE INTEGRATION OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY UPGRADES AS PART OF NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, REMODELS, OR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS. Actions: • Work with project applicants to design and orient buildings so that they are energy-efficient and consistent with community character. • Develop and share resources and materials to support consumer education on energy-efficient and sustainable building materials. • Encourage project applicants to participate in SCE 's "Savings by Design" Program. • Adopt the voluntary energy efficiency guidelines and use an energy efficiency checklist to help applicants identify cost-effective measures for projects (see Appendix D). POLICY 3.1 2020 kWh Reduction: 111,770-167,660 2020 MTC02 e Reduction: 30-40 Co-Benefits: Provides Permanent Energy Reduction, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Reduces Maintenance Costs POLICY 3.2: ENCOURAGE THE USE OF ENERGY-EFFICIENT APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENT IN NEW BUILDINGS. Actions: • Encourage project appl icants to install energy-efficient a ppliances within new and renovated buildings by highlighting the potential cost savings to project applicants and property owners. • Use the City's model energy efficiency code to support the use of smart-grid and Energy Star appliances in new development. • CITY OF TEMPLE CITY POLICY 3.2 2020 I<Wh Reduction: 360,050-550,91 0 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 100-150 Co-Benefits: Reduces Peak Energy Demand, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY POLICY 3.3: PARTICIPATE IN A REGIONAL EFFORT TO IMPLEMENT ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT. Actions: • Collaborate with the Energy Wise Partnership and the Los Angeles Chapter of the US Green Building Council to provide local training and workshops for energy-efficient building opportunities. • Support development of a regional energy manager position that could serve as an advisor to project applicants interested in achieving energy efficiency. • Work with other neighboring San Gabriel Valley cities to identify the most effective options to achieve energy efficiency in new development. Confirm the feasibility of adopting regionally consistent, mandatory standards for new development to exceed mandatory Title 24 energy efficiency standards, such as adoption of Los Angeles County's green building code. POLICY 3.3 2020 kWh Reduction: Supportive 2020 MTC02e Reduction: Supportive Co-Benefits: Provides Permanent Energy Reduction, Supports Community Education GOAL 4: ENHANCE THE CITY'S PLANNING FRAMEWORK TO PROVIDE ONGOING SUPPORT FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY. POLICY 4.1: STREAMLINE AND ENCOURAGE ENERGY EFFICIENCY THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THE PERMIT AND PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. Actions: • Consider fee adjustments and creation of administrative review and approval processes for energy efficiency projects. • Adopt the model energy efficiency code for use during the discretionary review process, and use the voluntary energy efficiency guidelines as a tool during plan review of applications to encourage integration of cost-effective measures to improve the energy efficiency of projects. • Create residential and nonresidential energy efficiency packets with information about financing and resources, for distribution during pre-application meetings and at the planning and building counter. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY POLICY 4.1 2020 kWh Reduction: Supportive 2020 MTC02e Reduction: Supportive Co-Benefits: Provides Permanent Energy Reduction lfl CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY POLICY 4.2: ALIGN PLANNING EFFORTS WITH ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION. Actions: • Incorporate and expand policies from this EAP into future updates of the City's General Plan . POLICY 4.2 2020 kWh Reduction: Supportive 2020 MTC02e Reduction: Supportive Co-Benefits: Supports Community Education GOAL 5: MAXIMIZE USE OF SHADING AND COOLING TO SUSTAIN A COMFORTABLE AND ENERGY - EFFICIENT URBAN ENVIRONMENT. POLICY 5.1: EXPAND THE CITY'S URBAN TREE FOREST. Actions: • Highlight the monetary, health, energy-saving, and water- conserving benefits of maintaining, preserving, and expanding the city's urban tree forest . • Increase the number of trees planted and maintained on public rights-of-way through community volunteer efforts and street tree planting requirements for new developments. • Consider providing incentives for planting well-placed shade trees to reduce household cooling electricity. POLICY 5.2: MAXIMIZE THE USE OF COOL ROOFS AND SURFACES TO REDUCE ELECTRICITY ENERGY USE. Actions: • Showcase the benefits and opportunities to install cool roofs and provide links to Cool California resources at community events and on the C ity's website. • Promote cost-effective opportunities to residents and business owners to install cool roofs, light-colored paved surfaces, and permeable pavement when not in conflict with community design guidelines. ~~~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY POLICY 5.1 2020 kWh Reduction: 46,690-312,690 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 10-80 Co-Benefits: Reduces Peak Energy Demand, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Reduces Urban Air Temperatures POLICY 5.2 2020 kWh Reduction: 167,140-288,030 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 40-80 Co-Benefits: Reduces Peak Energy Demand. Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Reduces Urban Air Temperatures CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY • Provide non~monetary support to energy~efficient ambassadors and community organizations to lead cool roof "work days'' co repaint traditional roofs at schools or public facilities with cool paint materials. • When cost~effective, use cool-colored and permeable pavement in City construction projects. GOAL 6: SUPPORT THE 2020 WAT ER REDUCT ION TARGETS SET BY THE CITY'S WATER PROVIDERS. POLICY 6.1: PROMOTE WATER-EFFICIENT PRACTICES THROUGH EDUCATIONAL EFFORTS TO PROMOTE THE CONSERVATION OF ELECTRICITY FOR WATER PUMPING, CONVEYANCE, AND TREATMENT. ENCOURAGE THE USE OF ENERGY-AND WATER- EFFICIENT WATER FIXTURES FOR INDOOR WATER USE. Actions: • Become a US Environmental Protection Agency Water Sense Partner and provide water education resources to the community. • Update the City's website to promote water conservation. • Work with project applicants to identify water conservation opportunities in new or retrofitted buildings. POLICY 6.1 2020 kWh Reduction: Supportive 2020 MTC02e Reduction: Supportive Co~ Benefits: Conserves Water. Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Community Education POLICY 6.2: ENCOURAGE THE USE OF ENERGY~ AND WATER-EFFICIENT WATER FIXTURES FOR INDOOR WATER USE. Actions: • Encourage local water providers to provide surveys and water conservation kits to customers. • Promote and distribute SCE's energy efficiency kit, which includes low~flow showerheads and faucet aerators . • Consider creating ultra~low~flow toilet and washing machine trade-in programs. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY POLICY 6.2 2020 kWh Reduction: 346,950-1.156,500 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 90-300 Co-Benefits: Conserves Water, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Community Education • " CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY POLICY 6.3: ENCOURAGE WATER-WISE LANDSCAPING. Actions: " Use the model energy efficiency code to strengthen adopted xeriscaping policies. " Work with other San Gabriel Valley cities to consider adoption of mandatory water-efficient standards, such as CALGreen Tier I standards for water efficiency . " Encourage residents to install irrigation control sensors through outreach, education, and incentives. " Consider a turf/grass removal incentive program. " Install educational information or demonstration gardens on City property to promote water conservation landscape practices. MUNICIPAL STRATEGIES Near-Term Projects POLICY 6.3 2020 I<Wh Reduction: 94,330-104,260 2020 MTC02e Reduction: 20-30 Co-Benefits: Conserves Water, Reduces Monthly Utility Costs, Supports Community Education A key objective of this EAP is to identify prioritized, actionable, turnkey strategies and projects. The EAP also identifies future opportunities for municipal energy efficiency projects. In order to evaluate potential energy efficiency projects, the City conducted audits at several key facilities , reviewed audit results and opportunities at other facilities, and identified near-term projects to be implemented. The City has committed to prioritizing the implementation of projects that yield cost savings and enhance municipal operations. The City has conducted an audit of City Hall, the community center, the civic center, and parking lots. The City is also identifying additional near-term projects to implement in close coordination with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) and SCE. It is anticipated that these priority short-term actions will help the City further advance toward Platinum-level Energy Leader Partnership (ELP) targets and long-term energy efficiency objectives. The City has committed to prioritizing the implementation of the projects in Table 17, which are identified in priority order of shortest to longest payback period . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY I Citywide Citywide Citywide Civic Center City Hall City Hall Live Oak Community Center Parking Lots 3, Sa, Sb, 7a, Sa & 8b Table 17: Near-Term Municipal Energy Efficiency Projects Project Lighting upgrades HVAC control upgrades Streetlight upgrades LED and other high efficiency lighting upgrades LED installation and replacement, lighting retrofits Installation of window film, implementation of demand- controlled ventilation Vending machine controls installation Installation of LED lighting fixtures Annual kWh Savings 120,0001 5,0001 120,7001•4 97,0103 34,3603 20,0203 97,0103 13,3703 Savings TBD 2 TBD 2 TBD 2 $14,550 $5,150 $3,000 $14,553 $1,910 SCE Incentive TBD 2 TBD 2 TBD 2 $6,110 $2,630 $2,790 $6,111 $720 November 2012 November 2012 December 2012 TBD 2 TBD 2 TBD 2 TBD 2 TBD 1 t The source of this information is the Energy Wise Partnership spreadsheet Funding Opportunities On-bill financing, SCREC,CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC, CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC. CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CEC loans On-bill financing, SCREC,CEC loans 2 To be determined. At the time of report preparation, estimated energy and GHG reduaions were unavailable . The SGVCOG and SCREC are working to con(lrm project information. 3 The source of this information is an audit that the City conducted with Willdan Energy Solutions. 4 The electricity reduaion for streetlights assumes that 50% of City-owned streetlights will be upgraded and will achieve 45% energy savings. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY Long-Term Municipal Policies In add ition to the near-term projects, the City has identified additional policies and progr ams to be implemented in the next eight ye ars to achieve Platinum Level status in SCE's ELP program by achieving a 20% reduct ion in electric ity use below 2006 electricity levels at City facilities . The C ity's General Plan is an Important document that helps guide the growth and development of the City. By incorporating energy efficiency and other sustainable practices into the General Plan, the City can ensure that such measures are systematically and consistently incorporated into plans , programs, policies, and d evelopment within Temple City. The City ofT em pte City is committed to integrating the Energy Action Plan into the nex t update of the General Plan . GOAL 7: BECOME ONE OF THE FIRST NET ZERO ELECTRICITY CITY GOVERNMENTS WI THIN THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY. POLICY 7.1: PILOT AND DEMONSTRATE THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE CITY'S INNOVATIVE ENERGY-EFFICIENT ACTIONS. Actions: • Work with the SGVCOG and the Energy Leader Partnership to host a permanent energy information display that highlights City achievements. • Participate in the SGVCOG's util ity manager program, the Enterprise Energy Management Information System, to track energy use and identify cost-saving opportunities through sub- metering and energy management. • Present a biannual report to City decision-makers as a means to demonstrate cost-effective energy efficiency projects. • Form a Platinum Energy Leader program for City staff to work with SCE and the Energy Leader Partnership to conduct ongoing outreach and promotion of the City's energy efficiency projects . POLICY7.2: MAXIMIZE THE EFFICIENCY OF EQUIPMENT IN CITY FACILITIES TO REDUCE MAINTENANCE AND ENERGY COSTS. Actions: • Adopt an energy-efficient procurement policy to ensure the ongoing purchase of efficient office and kitchen equipment that will result in energy cost savings that outweigh additional upfront costs. • Work with the SGVCOG and regional partners to reduce the cost of energy-efficient appliances and equipment through bulk purchases. • Install office control equipment, including plug load s ensors, at all C ity buildings. Iii CITY OF TEMP I E CITY CHAPTER4 ENERGY EFFICIENCY STRATEGY POLICY 7.3:0PTIMIZE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AT EXISTING CITY FACILITIES. Actions: • Set aside municipal savings from energy efficiency projects to fund additional energy efficiency projects. • Update the City's energy-efficient procurement policy to require that upon need for roof replacements , the use of cool roof materials will be considered and assessed. POLICY 7.4: IDENTIFY LONG-TERM TARGETS TO INCREASE THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT. Actions: • Monitor long-term opportUnities for cost-effective bulk purchasing of duct and insulation equipment or programmable thermostats for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. • Replace inefficient HVAC systems with more energy-efficient models. POLICY 7.5: IMPROVE OUTDOOR LIGHTING ENERGY EFFICIENCY WHILE REDUCING MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONAL COSTS. Actions : • Install selective light dimming at parks and parking lots consistent with public safety standards . • Install light and motion sensors for outdoor lights at City facilities, including parking lot structures. POLICY 7.6: CONSERVE WATER USE AT CITY FACILITIES TO REDUCE ELECTRICITY USE AND MODEL BEST PRACTICES TO THE COMMUNITY. Actions: • Remove turf at City facilities and parks . • Create zero-water medians that do not require irrigation. • Install electricity-and water-conserving irrigation controls. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTERS a INTRODUCTION This chapter outlines a path for the City of Temple City to implement the strategies described in this Energy Action Plan (EAP) and monitor overall progres s toward achieving the EAP reduction targets. The EAP implementation w i ll require City leadership to execute strategies and report the progress of implementation. This Plan identifies the responsible department for each policy and offers time frames and plan-level cost estimates for implementing each strategy. Lastly, successful implementation requires regular monitoring and reporting. City staff should monitor the progress of implementing the EAP on an annual basis and report to the City Council about the EAP progres s each year. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Temple City will work with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), the San Gabriel Valley Energy Wise Partnership (SGVEWP), and other partners as appropriate, such as Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles Reg ional Collaborative, and the Southern California Regional Energy Alliance, to identify effective procedures to track the status of energy efficiency projects without increasing the level of effort from existing City staff. A designated City staff lead will monitor Plan implementation and support ongoing regional collaboration. The City staff lead will participate in the identification of regional resources available to support and streamline the implementation process. All program activity managers will be requ ired to submit regular project updates to Temple City's designated EAP implementation coordinator and/or energy manager, includ ing written reports of activities and project outcomes. The energy manager will track both short-and long-term progress toward EAP targets. The SGVCOG is currently developing a regionally uniform method to collect, track, and report on EAP metrics and project outcomes. The City will work with the SGVCOG and the energy manager to benefit from these regional tools and standardize reporting processes. Temple City finance staff will maintain records of all project costs, funds, and expenditures. City staff will work closely with the energy manager to submit necessary reports to all funding agencies, including required financial reports and documentation of project outcomes. City staff or a third-party inspector will be responsible for all pre-and post-inspections of new or retrofitted work to confirm that the projects are installed, operational, and consistent with project objectives. The energy manager w ill be responsible for tracking all related project files and providing appropriate information to the SGVCOG and the SGVEWP . Crucial to the implementation of this Plan will be Temple City's implementation program. The implementation program identifies the anticipated electricity savings , GHG reduction, agency or department responsible for implementation, starting time frame , and co-benefits. IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES The City will use the implementation program presented in Table 18 to track, monitor, and update the EAP. As the City reports on progress in implementing the EAP, staff will evaluate the effectiveness of each policy to ensure that the anticipated electricity and GHG reductions are occurring. In the event that GHG reductions do not occur as expected, Temple City will be able to modify and add more policies to the EAP to ensure the City meets its reduction target. IMPLEMENTATION POLICY 1: ANNUALLY MONITOR AND REPORT THE CITY'S PROGRESS TOWARD ACHIEVING THE REDUCTION TARGET. • Facilitate implementation of policies and actions related to municipal operations. • Prepare an annual progress report for review and consideration by the City Council. • Utilize the monitoring and reporting tool to assist with annual reports. • Identify key staff responsible for annual reporting and monitoring. • CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION POLICY 2: REGULARLY REVIEW AND UPDATE THE CITY'S GHG INVENTORY, ENERGY PROFILE, AND EAP. • Conduct an annual review of electricity usage and associated GHG emiss ions. • Re-inventory community and municipal GHG emissions every three to five years. • Update the Plan to incorporate new technology, programs, and policies as available to ach ieve electricity efficiency. • Consider updating and amending the Plan, as necessary, should Temple City find that policies and actions are not meeting the intended electricity reductions. • When City resources are available, integrate the EAP into a comprehensive cl imate action plan or GHG reduction plan to incorporate GHG and energy/fuel reduction targets to address energy supply, natural gas demand, transportation, waste, wastewater, and other sectors as applicable . IMPLEMENTATION POLICY 3: CONTINUE TO DEVELOP COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS THAT SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EAP. • Continue collaboration with the SGVCOG and participation as an active member of the SGVEWP and the Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources Committee. • Participate in other SGVCOG-sponsored programs , projects, and events to help meet the goals described in this EAP . IMPLEMENTATION POLICY 4: SUPPORT REGIONAL FUNDING EFFORTS TO IMPLEMENT THE EAP. • Work with the SGVCOG to identify regional funding sources to support policies in this EAP . • Ensure implementation through the inclusion of policies and action in department budgets, the capital improvement program, and other plans as appropriate. • Pursue local, regional, state, and federal grants as appropriate to support implementation. IMPLEMENTATION POLICY 5: FULFILL SCE'S ENERGY LEADER PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS TO IMPLEMENT THIS ENERGY ACTION PLAN. • Confirm review and acceptance/adoption of this EAP by the City Council. • Identify the plan's implementation time frame to begin within six months of approval. • Integrate EAP implementation projects into the City's operating budget. • Integrate EAP initiatives into the City's General Plan and other appropriate policy documents. • Implement the identified policies, actions, and projects identified in this EAP. • Demonstrate to SCE that the energy efficiency actions identified in this EAP have been implemented and the criteria identified in Appendix D have been met. CIT{ OF TEMPLE C IT Y • CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING AND UPDATING THE EAP Implementation and Monitoring Tools Monitoring and Reporting Template To determine whether Temple City is on track to meet the adopted targets, it is important that the City monitor implementation progress on a regula r basis and identify whether the polic ies as implemented a re achievi ng their intended reductions or if additional policies w ill need to be implemented to meet the target. The implementation and financial metrics identified in th is EAP have been calculated us ing an Exce l-based workbook. This workbook calculates energy savings, GHG reductions, and financial costs and savings based on the key metrics identified in the Plan . These performance m e trics include information such as the average energy reduction per household, the number of trees planted, or the square feet of faciliti e s retrofitted. To support C ity staffs reporting efforts on the p rogress of EAP implementation, the workbook includes a reporting template and space for staff to enter the actual performance of each policy based on the key metrics identified. Once the information is entered for each year, updated energy savings, GHG reduction, and monetary costs o r savings incorporated into the report templa te can easily be e x ported and used to present EAP progress to C ity adv isory bodies, assist in annual fiscal budget planning, and highlight City and community success in reducing energy use through City newsletters and online media. Enterprise Energy Management Information System The SGVCOG is collaborating with the City ofT emple C ity and Los Angeles County to implement the Enterpris e Energy Management Information System (EEMIS) utility manager to track municipal energy usage, enabling participating San Gabriel Valley municipalities to access facility energy consumption, archive billing data, and report and analyze energy consumption data via the Internet. The EEMIS project was developed in 2000 and has been adapted to assist cities in the SGVCOG with monitoring, forecasting, and budgeting for energy use at city facilit ies. EEMIS includes the following components and features: • Web-based application using browser-based technology. • Collects data from all connected facilities and stores data in a standard format. • G e nerates usage and demand profiles for the purpose of ene rgy procurement and efficiency project identification . • Provides utility bill data for the d ifferent department subtenants within a building based on prevailing rates o r customized for modified rate schedule. • Utilizes energy cost analys is and notifications based on user-defined parameters to control costs by ga ining experience from similar usage facilities (based on area of facility , numbe r of occupants, size of equipment, season, historical usage over user-defined periods, etc.). El CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM The information in this implementation program provides an overall, planning-level framework for achieving the reductions in this Plan. Table 18 presents indicators for the implementation of each policy. These indicators represent the level of participation and energy reductions that would achieve the average range of the high and low electricity reductions in this Plan . The electricity metrics show the total number of participating households, nonresidential square footage, and energy reduction per participant necessary to achieve each policy's average reduction potential. Metrics for supportive policies are shown as "Supportive." Appendix C also presents the approach to quantification, including the analytical process for identifying appropriate regional reductions, costs, and financial benefits. Continued Partnership Opportunities One component for the successful implementation of Temple City's EAP will be the sharing of resources through continued communication and collaboration with other cities in the region. Continued collaboration will foster a more supportive environment to share best practices and potentially coordinate future requests for funding and/or implementation. Efforts to implement programs and policies on a regional scale will provide consistency in the energy efficiency market and leverage economies of scale. The City will continue to participate in SGVCOG discussions and events related to energy efficiency such as the SGVEWP, the Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources Committee, and other SGVCOG-sponsored events to help meet the goals described in this EAP. I .I : Promote energy conserva tion in existing residential structures through education and outreach. 1.2: Re duce e nergy use and plug load demand through upgrades to household appliances and equipment. -637,070 -608.500 Table 18: Implementation Program Table 3,740 Households 160 2 ,270 Households 220 120 Pool pumps 1,380 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY kWh Near-Term Community Development kWh Near-Term Community kWh Development • CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 1.3: Support owner- occupied whole house Owner-renovations that reduce -4,981,480 2,030 occupied 2.150 kWh Near-Term Community energy use and improve households Development thermal comfort of existing residential buildings . 1.4: Support renovations Community that reduce e nergy u se and Multi-family Development improve thermal comfort in -270,130 240 households 1.110 kWh Mid-Term a nd Public existing multi-family units Services and buildings . 1.5 : Encourage energy- efficient improvements in Supportive Pol icy -Not Estim ated Near-Ter m Community the city's historic housing D evelopment stock. 2.1 : Educate Temple City's bu siness es about opportunities to conserve Supportive Policy -Not Estimated N ear-Term Community energy use and reduce costs D evelopment through behavioral changes in daily operations. 2 .2 : Support the use of Community energy-efficient appliances -1.872,170 130 Nonresidential 13 ,940 kWh Near-Term Development and equipment in leased a nd buildings a nd Publ ic owner-occupied businesses. Services • CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 2.3: Facilitate retrofits and energy efficiency Non residential Community improvements within the -2.498,450 110 bu ildings 2 1.150 kWh Mid-Term D evelopment nonresidential building stock. 3.1: Support the integration 270 New 200 kWh Mid-Term Community of energy efficiency households D evelopment upgrades as p art of new -139,720 New building construction, 20 non residential 2 .480 kWh Mid-Term Community remodels, or tenant buildings Development improvements. 340 New 80 kWh 3 .2: Encourage the use of households energy-efficient appliances -455,480 N ew Near-Term Community and equipment in new D evelopment build ings . 30 nonres idential 14.480 kWh bu ildings 3 .3: Participate in a regional effort to implement energy Supportive Policy-Not Estim ated Near-Ter m Community efficiency standards for new Develo pme nt development. 4 .1: Streamline and encourage energy efficiency Community through the development Supportive Policy -Not Estim ated Near-Term Development standards and the permit and plan review process. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 4 .2: Align planning efforts Community with energy efficiency and Supportive Policy -Not Estimated Long-Term Development conservation. Participating Community 80 nonresidential 990 kWh 5 .1: Expand the city's urban -181,190 buildings Mid-Term Developme nt tree forest. a nd Par·ks and 2 ,880 Participating 30 kWh Recreation households 5 .2: Maximize the use of Participating kWh per Community 317,140 nonresidential 0.20 cool roofs and surfaces to -227,590 buildings square foot Mid -Term Development reduce electricity energy and Parks and use. 1,730 Participating 90 kWh Recreation households 6 . I: Promote water-efficient practices through educational efforts to promote the conservation Community of electr icity for water Supportive Policy -Not Estimated Near-Term Deve lopm e nt pumping, conveyance, and and Public treatment. Encourage the Servic e s use of energy-and water- efficient water fixtures for indoor water use. 6.2: Encourage the use of energy-and water-efficient -7 51,730 4,630 Households 70 kWh Near-Term Community water fixtures for indoor Development water use . • CITY or TEMPLE CITY 6.3: Encourage water-wise lan dscapin g. -99,300 I 1,520 Ho useholds 1 Electricity reductions represent the average of high and low reductions presented m Chapter 4. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 10 kWh Mid-Ter·m Community Development • GLOSSARY OF TERMS Adjusted Business-as-Usual (ABAU) Forecast An emissions forecast that accounts for actions and legislation implemented by the State of California to reduce greenhouse gas emissions statewide that will a lso have a measurable beneficial impact for local jurisdictions' emissions. Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 Establishes a comprehensive program of regulatory and market mechanisms to achieve real, quantifiable, cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gases for the State of California. Makes the California Air Resources Board (CARB) responsible for monitoring and reducing statewide greenhouse gas emissions, with a target to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Baseline Inventory The base year for assessment of energy trends against which future progress can be measured for a single calendar year (2005-2008), consistent with legislative guidance and the Assembly Bill 32 Seeping Plan. Best Practice Coordinated technologies, systems, and design approaches, which (through research and experience) demonstrate the ability to consistently achieve above standard results while avoiding negative environmental impacts. Best practices change over time as improved components, technologies, systems, and design approaches become available. Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Building Envelope All components of a building that enclose conditioned space, and separate it from unconditioned space or the outdoors. CITY OF TEMPLE C I TY " GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Buildout; Build-out Development of land to its full potential or theoretical capacity as permitted under current o r proposed planning or zoning designations. Business as Usual (BAU) A scenario that assumes that no specific actions w ill be taken to reduce emissions and growth coming from the expansion of activity and services within the city. All forecasts are based on this scenario. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) An association of air pollution control officers representing the 35 local air quality agencies throughout California . California Air Resources Board (CARB) A part of the Cal ifornia Environ mental Protection Agency that reports directly to the Governor's Office in the Executive Branch of Cal ifornia State Government. CARB's mission is to p romote and protect public health, welfare, and ecological resources through the effective a nd efficient reduction of air pollutants while recognizing and considering the effects on the economy of the state. Source: California Long Term Ene rgy Efficiency Strategic Plan California Building Code (Title 24, Part 6) Californ ia Code of Regulations , Title 24, also known as the California Building Standards Code (composed of 12 parts). Title 24, Part 6 sets forth California's energy efficiency standards for resi dential and nonresidential build ings and was established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Source: Southern Cal ifornia Edison California Environmental Quality Act A state law requiring state and local agencies t o regulate activities with consideration for environmental protection. If a proposed activity has the potential for a significant adverse environmental impact, an environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared and certified as to its adequacy before action can be taken on the proposed project. General plans require the preparation of a program EIR . CaJifornia Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 See Assembly Bill 32. California Green Building Code (CALGreen, Title 24, Part II) Refe rs to CALGreen component of the California Building Code. See California Build ing Code. California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (CEESP) A plan adopted by the Cal ifornia Public Util ities Commissi on in 2008 that presents a single road map to achieve maximum energy savings across all major groups and sectors in Cal ifornia. This comprehensive plan for 2009 to 2020 is the state's first integrated framework of goals and strategies for saving energy, covering government, utility. and private sector actions, and holds energy efficiency to its role as the highest priority resource in meeting California's energy needs . (11 Y or HMPLE CITY GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS California Solar Initiative (CSI) Allows the Califo r nia Public Utilities Commission to provide incentives to install solar technology on e xi sting residential, commercial, nonprofit, and governmental buildings if they are customers of the state's investor-owned util ities: Pacific Gas and Electric, San Diego Gas & Electric , or Southern California Ed ison. Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (C02e) A metric measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases based upon their global warming potential (GWP). The carbon dioxide equivalent for a gas is derived by multiplying the tons of the gas by the associated GWP. For example, the GWP for methane is 21 . This means that emissions of one mill ion metric tons of methane are equivalent to emissions of 21 million MTC02e . City Energy Action Team (CEAT) A team assembled to provide input on Energy Action Plan (EAP) preparation and participate in EAP implementation. The team is composed of the City's key staff and department representatives, including those necessary to implement EAP projects, such as building maintenance staff. CEA T members support data collection, share information on existing efforts and projects, and advise the development of EAP strategies. Clean Car Fuel Standard (AB 1493 -Pavley) Signed into law in 2002 and commonly referred to as Pavley standards. Requires carmakers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from new passenger cars and light trucks beginning in 20 II . CARB anticipates that the Pavley standards will reduce greenhouse gas emiss ions from new California passenger vehicles by about 22 % in 2012 and about 30% in 20 16, all while improving fuel efficiency and reducing motorists' costs. Climate Change (global climate change) The term "climate change" is sometimes used to refer to all forms of climatic inconsistency, but because the earth's climate is never static, the term is more properly used to imply a sign ificant change from one cl imatic cond it ion to another. In some cases, climate change has been used synonymously with the term "global w arming"; scientists, however, t end to use the term in the wider sense to also include natural changes in climate. Community-Wide Greenhouse Gas Inventory Looks at greenhouse gas emissions caused by all activities within a city's geographic boundary. Typical sectors include residential. commercial. and industrial energy use, transportation, off-road equipment, waste generation, and energy associated with water delivery and treatment. Cool California A State-operated website that provides tools and information to residents, businesses, schools, and local governments to take action related to cl imate change. The website links and resources related to energy efficiency, cool roofs, grant programs, and more. The website is available at http://www.coolcalifornia.org/. Demand Response Mechanism for managing end-user electricity consumption in response to energy supply conditions. A d e mand responsive system is one that can be controlled {either directly or remotely) to reduce electricity consumption during times of increased energy demand and/or constrained energy availability. Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan CITY Of TEMPLE CITY " GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Direct Access Electricity Direct access s ervice is an optional choice that customers can select to purchase electricity and other services from an electric service provider (ESP), instead of from Southern California Edison . An ESP is an entity that contracts d irectly w ith its customers to provide electric service and is responsible for arranging an adequate supply of electricity. ESPs are required to meet certain requirements with the California Public Utilities Commission in addition to mee ting financial and technical requirements with Southern Californi a Edison . Electricity Sectors The EAP groups electricity use into four key topics , based on the type of activity chat consumes electricity and causes g r eenhouse gas emissions . The electricity sectors consist of existing residential , existing nonresidential , new development (residential and nonresidential), and City gover nment operations. Emissions Forecast Baseline emissions are forecast to future years based on projected inc r eases in population, jobs, households, and other local trends. Forecasts will show two scenarios: (I) outcomes if no behavioral or regulatory changes are made (a bus iness-as-usual scenario), and (2) outcomes to account for reduction efforts mandated by the State of California, such as new veh icle standards and fuel standards. Emissions Standard The maximum amount of pollutant legally perm itted to be discharged from a single source, either mobile or stationary. Energy Committee An advi so ry committee whose members would be appointed by the C ity Council and composed of local residents with expertise in sustainab ility-related fields . The committee would be responsible for providing input to the C ity Council regarding policies and opportunities for energy programs, in addition to helping coordinate with responsible departments and managers for action implementation. The C ity of Temple City does not currently have an Energy Committee. This Plan recommends creation of an Energy Committee to support ongoing energy program implementation . Energy Conservation Methods of reducing energy waste, such as turning off lights or heating when not needed. Energy Efficiency Doing the same or more work with less energy, such as replacing incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescent light bulbs, using appliances that use less electricity to run than older models, or utilizing a vehicle that can travel farther using the same amount of gasoline. Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant A program funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and managed by the US Department of Energy to assist cities, counties, states, and territories to develop, promote, and implement energy efficiency and conservation programs and projects. Energy. Environment, and Natural Resources Committee A committee of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments that coordinates environment-related efforts among the valley's many jurisdictions, pursues funding opportunities for the valley, and promotes beneficial policies to its member agencies . C IT Y OF TEMPLE CITY GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Energy Leader Partnership Model Southern California Edison (SCE) developed the Energy Leader Partnership (ELP) Model to provide support to local governments in identifying and implementing opportunities to improve energy efficiency in municipal facilities and promoting community awareness of demand side energy management opportunities. By participating in SCE 's ELP, local governments are taking actions to support the California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan while saving energy and fiscal resources for their communities. In the San Gabriel Valley, the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) is leading the implementation of the ELP with SCE and 27 of the 31 member cities in the SGVCOG. The ELP comprises four focus areas: municipal retrofits, demand response, strategic plan support, and energy efficiency programs coordination. The ELP program has four incentive tiers for participating cities: (I) Valued Partner, (2) Silver, (3) Gold, and (4) Platinum. Each city begins the program as a valued partner and to advance to the next incentive tier, each participating city must achieve the pre-determined energy savings and requirements community-wide and for city facilities. Energy Star A joint program of the US Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Energy to provide consumers with information and incentives to purchase the most energy-efficient products available. Energy Upgrade California A new statewide program that offers incentives to homeowners who complete select energy-saving home improvements on a single-family residence. These incentive packages encourage customers to take a "whole house" approach by combining several related improvements at once to increase a home's overall energy efficiency and achieve greater savings. By working with participating contractors, homeowners can choose from two incentive options, the Basic Upgrade Package or the Advanced Upgrade Package, based on their improvement needs and budget. Source: Pacific Gas and Electric Company Enterprise Energy Management Information Systems The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SVGCOG) has funded and created a program to set up a "utility manager" computer program to track municipal usage and identify need for sub-metering to plan, budget, and manage bills for each city facility. The SGVCOG is collaborating with the County of Los Angeles to implement the County's Enterprise Energy Management Information System (EEMIS) utility manager to track municipal energy usage, enabling participating San Gabriel Valley municipalities to access facility energy consumption, archive billing data, and report and analyze energy consumption data via the Internet. The County's EEMIS project was developed in 2000 and has been adapted to assist cities in the SGVCOG with monitoring, forecasting, and budgeting for energy use at city facilities. Goal The desired end state or expected outcome related to electricity reduction targets in the Energy Action Plan (EAP). Each goal corresponds to one of the EAP's seven topic areas: existing residential buildings, existing nonresidential buildings, new development, planning framework, urban cooling, water and electricity efficiency, and municipal operations. Green Building Sustainable or "green" building is a holistic approach to design, construction, and demolition that minimizes the building's impact on the environment, the occupants, and the community. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Greenhouse Gases Gases which cause heat to be trapped in the atmosphere, warming the earth. Greenhouse gases are necessary to keep the earth warm. but increasing concentrations of these gases are implicated in global climate cha nge . The majority of gree nhouse gases come from natural sources, although human activity is also a m ajor contributor. The principal greenhouse gases that enter the atmosphere because of human activi ties are: Carbon Dioxide (C02): Carbon dioxide is a colorless, odorless gas that occurs naturally in the earth's atmosphere. Carbon dioxide also enters the atmosphere through the bu rning of fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), solid waste, trees, and wood products, and a s a result of other chemical reactions (e.g., manufacture of cement). Carbon dioxide is also removed from the atmosphere (or "sequestered") when it is absorbed by plants as part of the biological carbon cycle . Methane (CH4): Methane is emitted du ring the production and transport of coal, natural gas , and oil. Methane emissions also result from livestock an d other agricultural practices and by the decay of organic waste in municipal solid waste landfills . Nitrous Oxide (N2 0 ): N itrous oxide is emitted during agricultural and industrial activities, as well as during combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste. Fluorinated Gases: Hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride are synthetic, powerful greenhouse gases that are emitted from a variety of industrial processes. Flu orinated gases are sometimes used as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances (i.e., chlorofluorocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, and halons). These gases are typically emitted in smaller quantities, but because they are potent greenhouse gases, they are sometimes referred to as high global warming potential gases ("high GWP gases"). Greenhouse Gas Inventory A greenhouse gas inventory provides estimates of the amount of greenhouse gases emitted to and removed from the atmosphere by human activities . A city or county that conducts an inventory looks at both community emiss ions sources as well as emissions from government operations. A base year is chosen and used to gather all data from that year. Inventories include data collection from such things as vehicle miles traveled (VMT), energy usage from electricity and gas, and waste. Inventories include estimates for carbon dioxi de (C02), methane (CH4). nitrous oxide (N20), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and perfluorocarbons (PFC s), which are referred to as the six Kyoto gases. Green Teams A formal or informal group of people in a company who are passionate a bout environmental issues . The groups brainstorm solutions and promote ways in which their company's practices can become more environmentally sustainable, often creating sustainability pl ans and approaching management for funding to meet plans . Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Green Waste Refers to lawn , garden, or park plant trimmings and materials and can be used in home composts or p icked up curbside by municipal waste haulers. Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems that help maintain good indoor air quality through adequate ventilation with filtration and provide thermal comfort . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Implementation Action An action, procedure, program, or strategy to achieve the electricity reductions of a policy. Action items may provide interim steps or supporting strategies. Actions may also indicate the range of opportunities to increase the electricity reduction potential of a pol icy. Kilowatt-Hour (kWh) A unit of energy equivalent to one kilowatt (kW) of energy used for an hour. For example, if an appliance requires a kW of energy to function, leaving the appliance on for one hour would consume one kWh of energy. Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Method A consistent body of methods or procedures to approach a given task; in terms of a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and forecast, refers to an internally consistent approach to quantify greenhouse gas emissions that supports the principles of inventories identified in the Local Government Operations Protocol: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy. Mixed Use Properties on which various uses such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with significant functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design. A "single site" may include contiguous properties. Municipal Operations Greenhouse Gas Inventory Looks at greenhouse gas emissions caused by City operations. Typical sectors include energy associated with City facilities, vehicle fleets, equipment, waste generation, employee commutes, and more. Participating Municipality Those jurisdictions or member cities that: (i) are located in Southern California Edison's (SCE) service territory; and (ii) have been selected by SCE and the SGVCOG to participate in the program as set forth in the Statement of Work. Includes 27 participating cities (Alhambra, Arcadia, Baldwin Park, Bradbury, Claremont, Covina, Diamond Bar, Duarte, El Monte, Glendora, Irwindale, La Canada-Flintridge, La Puente, La Verne, Monrovia, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pomona, Rosemead, San Dimas, San Gabriel, San Marino, Sierra Madre, South El Monte, South Pasadena, Temple City, and West Covina). Source: Southern California Edison Performance Indicators Specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, and time-specific requirements that will directly and measurably contribute to the City's Energy Action Plan goals. Source: Southern California Edison Personal Energy Action Survey As part of the regional partnership with the SGVCOG, the City distributed the personal energy action survey on energy efficiency at public events and through the City website. A blank version of the survey is provided in Appendix A Participation in the survey was voluntary. Survey results help to provide a useful snapshot of energy-related opinion and behavior; however, the results should not be interpreted as statistically valid. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Policy A statement that guides decision-making and indicates a commitment to achieve the specified outcomes of the goal. Pol icies provide the foundation for quantification of electricity reduction potentials in the Energy Action Plan . Project Steering Committee Along with other San Gabriel Valley cities taking part in the regional Energy Action Plan (EAP) project, the City participated in a Project Steering Committee (PSC) throughout EAP development. The purpose of the PSC is to confirm a regional approach to EAP development, guide the project, and share best practices among jurisdictions. Starting in July 20 I I, the PSC convened approximately once a month. During PSC meetings, representatives from San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments staff and technical consultant project team facilitated discussions and p resentations to review options to achieve electricity efficiency. Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) A form of fi nancing that creates municipal finance districts to provide loans to homeowners and businesses for energy-efficient retrofits and renewable energy system installat ions . Loans are repaid through an annual surcharge on property tax assessments. Governor Schwarzenegger signed the nation's first law allowing PACE financing in 2008. Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Public Goods Charge The funds which make up the Implementer Budget and which are collected from electric utility ratepayers pursuant to Section 381 of the California Public Utilities Code for public purposes programs, including energy effi ciency programs approved by the California Public Utilities Commission. Source: Southern California Edison Rebate Offered by the state, utility, or local government to promote the installatio n of renewables and energy efficiency projects. Renewable Energy Energy from sources that regenerate a nd are less damaging to the environment, such as solar, wind, biomass, and s mall -s cale hydroelectric power. Renewables Portfolio Standard Requires utility providers to increase the portion of energy that comes from renewable sources to 20% by 20 I 0 and to 33% by 2020. Due to potential implementation issues, the adjusted business-as-usual fo recast assumes that energy providers will achieve a minimum 28% renewable portfolio by 2020. San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) A Jo int Powers Authority representing 31 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas in the San Gabriel Valley. The SGVCOG works with member agencie s co collectively address transportation, housing, economic growth, and environment issues that are most effectively addressed at a regional scale . C ITY or: HMPLE CITY GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS San Gabriel Valley Energy Wise Partnership An alliance between the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and Southern California Edison to bring energy savings to the San Gabriel Valley through innovative public education and energy efficiency projects . Through this program, the SGVCOG and SCE work with local governments throughout the San Gabriel Valley to leverage resources, share information, educate local governments regarding energy efficiency opportunities, and implement energy efficiency projects. Savings by Design (SBD) California's nonresidential new construction energy efficiency program, administered statewide and funded by energy utility customers through the Public Purpose Programs surcharge applied to gas and electric services. Projects participating in SBD receive services including design assistance, owners incentives, design team incentives, and energy design resources. Services begin in the project design phase and continue through construction completion. Source: Southern California Edison SCE Energy Leader Partnership A program run by Southern California Edison (SCE) that provides support to local governments and institutions to assist them in achieving a joint vision of sustainability. SCE works closely with partners to address key issues that are barriers to achieving this vision and develop a long-term energy efficiency strategy. For local governments, SCE provides support to identify and address energy efficiency opportunities in municipal facilities, take actions supporting the California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, and increase community awareness and participation in demand side management opportunities. A key goal in SCE's local government partnerships is helping cities and counties lead by example in addressing energy efficiency first in their own municipal facilities . SCE Incentive (financial incentive) Provisions issued by Southern California Edison in order to promote the installation of energy efficiency and renewable projects in the utility territory. There are a variety of types of incentives, including rebates, loans, and alternative rates. The incentives are paid through the statewide public goods charge. Sectors Emissions are grouped by the type of activity that generated the emissions, such as transportation, residential energy use, or commercial energy use. Senate Bill 375 Requires the California Air Resources Board to develop regional greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets to be achieved from the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. The regional targets adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) are an 8% reduction in per capita transportation emissions by 2020 and a conditional 13% reduction by 2035 which will be achieved through the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy as part of the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan update. Simple Payback Period Amount of time required to recover an initial investment. Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The air pollution control agency for all of O range County and the urban portions of Los Angeles , Riverside and San Bernardino counties, the smoggiest region of the United States. The SCAQMD's goal is to protect the health of residents while remaining sensitive to businesses. Southern California Edison (SCE) An investor-owned utility that is the primary electricity provider to Southern California and the San Gabriel Valley . Southern California Regional Energy Consortium Los Angeles County program that will bundle like p rojects for economies of scale after city energy efficiency p rojects have been identified . Standard Practice As opposed to best practices, standard practices include techniques, policies , methodologies, procedures, technologies, and systems that are typically employed by practitioners and generally do not achieve optimal results (in terms of energy efficiency, demand-respons iveness, high quality, environmental s ustainability, smart-grid connectedness, and integratio n with renewable energy generation sources). Source: California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Sustain ability Community use of natural resources in a way that does not jeopardize the ability of future generations to live and prosper. Sustainable Development Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Source: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, also known as the Brundtland Commission or Brundtland Report Title 24 See California Building Code. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) A key measure of overall street and highway use. Reducing VMT is often a major objective in efforts to reduce vehicular congestion and achieve regional air quality goals . Water Conservation Reducing water use, such as turning off taps, shortening shower times, and cutting back on outdoor irrigation . Water Efficiency Replacing older technologies and practices in order to accomplish the same results with less water; for example, by replacing toilets with new low-water-using models and by installing "smart controllers" in irrigated areas . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS Zero Net Energy For buildings , use of no more energy over the course of a year than can be generated onsite through re newa ble resources such as solar, wind, or geothe rmal power. Source: California Long Ter m Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan CITY or rEMPLE CITY • Akbari, Hashem. n.d. Energy Savings Potentials and Air Quality Benefits of Urban Heat Island Mitigation. http://heatisland.lbl.gov/. Aquacraft Inc. 2003. Residential Indoor Water Conservation Study. http:/ /www.ebmud.com/sites/defa ultlfiles/pdfs/residential_indoor _we_ study_ O.pdf. BPA (Bonn e ville Power Administration). 20 II. Residential Behavior Based Energy Efficiency Program Profiles 20 II. http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/n/pdf/BBEE_Res_Profiles_Dec_20 ll .pdf. Brook M .• B. Chrisman, P. David , T . Ealey, D . Eden, K. Moore, K. Ride r, P. Strait, G . D. Taylor, and J. Wu. 20 I I. Draft Staff Report: Achieving Energy Savings in California Buildings ( 11-IEP-1 F). California Energy Commission, Efficiency and Renewables D ivision . Publication number: CEC-400-20 11-007-SD. Brown, Rich, Sam Borgeson, Jon Koomey, and Peter Biermayer. 2008. US Building-Sector Energy Efficiency Potential. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California. http://enduse.lbl.gov/info/LBNL-1 096E.pdf. Bu il ding Doctors. 20 I I . Los Angeles CA Home Energy Performance Assessment. California Building Standards Commission. 20 I 0. California Code of Regulations, Title 24: Part I I: California Green Building Standards Code. http://www.documents.dgs .ca.gov/bs dCALG reen/20 I 0 _ CA _Green_ Bldg. pdf. Califor nia Energy Commission. 2006. Refining Est imates of Water-Related Energy Use in California. PIER Final Project Report. Prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc . CEC-500-2006-1 18. ---. 20 12 . 20 13 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. CITY 0~ TEMPLE CITY • " PERSONAL ENERGY ACTION SURVEY CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 20 I 0. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. http://capcoa.org/wp-contentluploads/20 I 0/ II /CAPCOA-Quantification-Report-9- 14-Final.pdf. City ofT emple City. 20 12. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Forecast Report. ---.. 20 12. Temple City Connect. EECBG Project Summary. 2012. Elk Grove Multi Family Retrofit Projects (not published). Golden State Water Company. 20 I I . 20 I 0 Urban Water Management Plan-South San Gabriel. Accessed November 28. 20 I I. http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/20 13standards/rulemaking/documents/20 12-5-31-ltem-05- Adoption_ Hearing_Presentation.pdf. ICLEI -Local Governments for Sustainability. 2012. Climate and Air Pollution Planning Assistant (CAPPA) Version 1.5 . ltron, Inc . 2007. California Commercial End-Use Survey -Results Page. http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. KEMA. Inc . 2009 California Residential Appliance Saturation Study, Volume 2 : Results. (October 20 I 0). CEC-200-20 I 0-004. Los Angeles County Office of the As sessor. 20 12. Los Angeles County Parcel Viewer. http://m aps .assessor.lacounty.gov/mapping/viewer.asp. REAS (Residential Energy Assessment Services), Inc . 20 II a. Encino CA Home Energy As sessment. ---.. 20 I I b. San Fernando CA Home Energy Performance Assessment. San Gabriel County Water Distr ict. 20 I I. Urban Water Management Plan 20 I 0 . Accessed November 28, 20 I I. Sunny Slope Water Compa ny Water District. 20 II . Urban Water Management Plan 20 I 0 . Accessed Novembe r 28, 20 I I. Upper San Gabriel Valley Water District. 20 I I. Urban Water Management Plan 20 I 0 . Accessed November 28, 20 I I. US Census Bureau. 2006-20 I 0 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Table DP-4: Selected Hous ing Characteristics. US Env ironmental Protection Agency. 2005 . Reducing Urban Heat Island Compendium of Strategies: Cool Pavements. http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/resources/pdf/CooiPavesCompendium.pdf Water Systems Consulting. 20 II . 20 I 0 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed November 28, 20 I I . CITY OF-TEMPLE CI TV APPENDlXA • APPENDIX A: PERSONAL ENERGY ACTION SURVEY PERSONAL ENERGY ACTION SURVEY: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ENERGY ACTION PLAN Your City is initiating an Energy Efficiency Plan to achieve determine the City's existing and future energy use and to meet the City's energy reduction goals. This survey is an important way to assist City staff and provide input into the project planning process. It should take about I 0 minutes to fill out. This project has been funded by Southern California Edison (SCE) as part of the California Long-Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan to develop a Regional Framework and individual energy efficiency chapters of cl imate action plans (EECAP) for cities in the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG). If you would like more information regarding the project, p lease contact Marisa Creter, at mcreter@sgvcog.org or (626) 457-1800. J) What City do you live and/or work in the most? • Alhambra • El Monte • Monrovia • Sierra Madre • Arcadia • Glendora • Montebello • South El • Baldwin Park • Irwindale • Monterey Monte • Bradbury • La Canada Park • South • Claremont Flintridge • Pomona Pasadena • Covina • La Puente • Rosemead • Temple City • Diamond Bar • La Verne • San Dimas • Walnut • Duarte • San Gabriel • West Covina • San Marino CITY O F TEMPLE C IT Y PERSONAL ENERGY ACTION SURVEY 2) What do you identify with most when thinking of the City chosen above? • Resident • Business Owner • Work • Other 3) Which of the following ranges includes your age? • 24 or under • 25 to 34 • 35 to 44 • 45 to 54 • 55 to 64 • 65 to 74 • 75 and a bove 4) If you do not reside in the City you chose above, in what city do you reside? • Please choose a city from the list or enter a city below. • Other (please specify 5) Do you rent or own your home? • Rent house • Rent apartment • Own 6) How many people live In your household (Including yourself)? • • 2 • 3 • 4 or more 7) What have you already done in your home or business to reduce energy use? (Select all that apply) • Replaced older light bulbs w ith more energy efficient bulbs • Replaced appliances w ith more energy efficient models • Replaced or upgraded heating and cooling system • CITY OF TEMPLE CITY PERSONAL ENERGY ACTION SURVEY • Upgraded insulation • Upgraded to more energy efficient windows • Installed a solar hot water heater • Installed solar or wind systems on my roof or property • I have not done anything to my home or business to reduce energy use • Other 8) Which of the following would you be ready to do in the next year to reduce energy use in your home or business? (Select all that apply) • Replace older light bulbs with more energy efficient bulbs • Replace appliances with more energy efficient models • Replace or upgrade heating and cooling system • Upgrade insulation • Upgrade to more energy efficient windows • Install a solar hot water heater • Install solar or wind systems on my roof or property • Nothing • Other 9) Which of the following would you be ready to do in the next five (5) years to reduce energy use in your home or business? (Select all that apply) • Replace older light bulbs with more energy efficient bulbs • Replace appliances with more energy efficient models • Upgrade insulation • Install a solar hot water heater • Install Photovoltaic Solar Panels on roof • Nothing • Other I 0) What would encourage you to install any of the technologies mentioned in the previous questions? (Select all that apply) • More information on the energy I financial savings • Grants or incentive programs to offset costs • Low-interest loans • List of reliable contractors or installers CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " PERSONAL ENERGY ACTION SURVEY " Lower utility bills " None of the above " Other I I) In general, which of the following strategies do you support to achieve energy efficiency? (Select all that apply) " Voluntary, incentive-based measures for individuals , businesses, and the City to achieve energy efficiency. " Mandatory requirements for individuals, businesses, and the City to ach ieve energy efficiency. For more information, please visit: www.s gvener gyw ise.o rg/energyplan CITY OF TEMPL[ CITY APPENDIX B • APPENDIX 8: GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST INVENTORY AND FORECAST PURPOSE This greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory and forecast (Inventory) will act as a foundation for the City of Temple City's Energy Action Plan (EAP) by informing the City and the community of the largest sources of GHG emissions, and thus the largest opportunities for reduction. The Inventory identifies the major and minor sources of GHG emissions to help in the process of creating reduction strategies in the EAP in response to local emissions characteristics. Specifically, the Inventory does the following : • Presents GHGs from community-wide and municipal activities in calendar year 2006. • Forecasts how community-wide emissions will increase by 2020 and 2035 if no behavioral or regulatory changes are made (known as a business-as-usual scenario). • Adjusts the GHG forecasts to account for reduction efforts mandated by the State of California, such as new energy efficiency and vehicle standards. • Provides City staff, decision-makers, and stakeholders with adequate information to direct development of an EAP and to establish GHG emissions reduction and energy efficiency targets, if desired. RELEVANT EMISSIONS The Inventory includes the major sources of GHGs caused by activities in the City of Temple City per best practices and consistent with the methodologies outlined in the Best Practices Memo and in the Regional Framework and those recommended by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The Inventory analyzes the following community and municipal emissions sources: CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST COMMUNITY • Energy -Electricity and natural gas consumed by residents, businesses, and industry in the ci ty in 2006. • Direct Access Electricity -Electricity purchased by commercial customers from utilities other than Southe rn Californ ia Edison (SCE). Direct access natural gas was not requested a nd will not be reported in the Inventory. • Street and Traffic Lighting -Electricity used by street and traffic lights within the city but not owned by the City. • On-Road Transportation -Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in, to, and from the city in 2006. • Waste -Methane emissions from solid waste, a lso known as municipal solid waste, and green waste, or alternative daily cover or ADC, sent to landfills and regional incinerators (also known as t ransformation fa cilities) from the city in 2006. • Water -The electricity used to pump, de liver, and treat water for consumption in city limits. • Wastewater-The energy requ ired to collect and treat the wastewater disposed of in the city in 2006. • Off-Road Equipment -Emissions from construction and lawn and garden equipment and vehicles operated within the city. MUNICIPAL • Buildings -Electricity, natural gas, and diesel consumed by C ity buildings and facilities in 2006. • Off-Road Equipment -Fuel used for construction projects, landscaping, or other off-road purposes in 2006. • Fleet -Gasol ine and compressed natural gas (CNG) used by all City-owned vehicles. • Lighting -Electricity, paid for by the City, used by street, traffic, and/or outdoor lighting w ithin city limits. • Water-Electricity used by City-owned water a nd/or wastewater pumps. • Employee Commute and Travel -Emiss ions from the vehicles City employees use to get to and from work and indirect emissions from business trips in personal vehicles. • Government-Generated Solid Waste -Indirect emissions from the waste disposed of by employees and operations of the City. • CITY OF TEMPLE CIT Y APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST KEY CONCEPTS The following terms are used throughout the Inventory and are fundamental to unde r standing the contents of the GHG inventory and forecast: • Baseline year -Emissions are quantified for the base li ne year of 2006, which is consistent with the baseline year definition of Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act. This baseline year allows the City to track and observe the impact of its actions taken to date and better inform future GHG reduction strategies. • Business-as-usual (BAU) -The scenario on which all forecasts are based. Assumes no specific actions are taken to reduce e mi ssions and growth comes from the expansion of activity and services within the city. • Carbon dioxide equivalent (C02e) -Represents the three main GHGs-carbon dioxide (C02), methane (CH4). and nitrous oxide (N20)-in comparable terms, since all three gases trap heat in the atmosphere differently. GHGs a re reported in metric tons (MT) of C02e (MTC02e). • Sectors -Emissions are grouped by the type of activity that generated the emissions, such as on-road transportation, residential energy use , or commercial energy use . COMMUNITY-WIDE INVENTORY INVENTORY SUMMARY The community of Temple City emitte d approximately 186,320 MTC02e in the baseline year 2006 . As shown in Figure B-1 and Table B-1, on-road transportation contributed the highest proportion of GHG em issions at 98,830 MTC02e, or 53% of total commun ity-wide emissions . The next largest sectors are residential energy (47, 140 MTC02e) and commercial/industrial energy ( 16 ,850 MTC02e), making up 25% and 9% of total community-wide emissions , respectively. The remaining sectors of waste, street and traffic lighting, water, direct access electricity, off-road equipment, and wastewater contribute about 12% of Temple City's total GHG emissions. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY El " APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Figure B-1: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector On-Road Transportation 53 % Street & T raffic Lighting 3% Waste 3%~ /'~~r-;~, Water .&-----2% Wastewater <I % Residential Energy 25 % Table B-1: Community-Wide GHG Emissions by Sector Sector Residential Energy Commercial/Industrial Energy Direct Access Electricity Street & Traffic Lighting On-Road Transportation Community-Generated Waste Off-Road Equipment Water Wastewater Total* 47,140 16,850 3,240 5,970 98,830 6,270 2,720 4,410 890 186,320 Percentage of Total 25% 9 % 2% 3% 53% 3% 1% 2% <1% 100% * Due to rounding, the total may not equ al the sum of compone nt parts. DETAILED ANALYSIS BY SECTOR Each sector in the community inventory consists of multiple subsectors that contribute to the total emissions. Table B-2 summarizes activity data and GHG emissions for each community sector and CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST subsector. This information shows the individual impact of each activity included in summary Table B-1. For example, the residential energy category in Table B-1 consists of emissions from residential electricity and residential natural gas. Table B-2: Detailed Activity Data and GHG Emissions Subsector Activity Data Unit Residentia l El ectricity 74,949,540 kWh 21 ,920 Residential Natural Gas 4,740,830 * Therms 25,220 Commercial/Industrial Electricity 39,524,660 kWh 11,560 Commercial/Industrial Natural Gas 994,150 Therms 5,290 Direct Access Electricity 8,002,070 kWh 3,240 Street & Traffic Lighting 20,417,790 kWh 5,970 On-Road Transportation 185,720,500 Annual VMT 98,830 Waste-So lid Waste 29,300 Tons ofWaste 5,390 Waste -Green Waste 4,770 TonsofADC 740 Waste -Transformed 460 Tons Transformed 140 Off-Road Equipment-Lawn & Garden 11,520 Households 10 Off-Road Equipment-Construction 210 Permits Issued 2,710 Water 15,078,320 kWh 4,410 Wastewater 3,026,270 kWh 890 Total** 186,320 *Activity data was not available during preparation of this report 20/0 data used as proxy for 2006. ** Due to rounding, the total may not equal the sum of component parts. MUNICIPAL INVENTORY INVENTORY SUMMARY Operations and activities by the City of Temple City in 2006 resulted in approximately 880 MTC02e. Figure B-2 and Table B-3 depict the contribution of each activity to the total GHG emissions . For Temple City, the largest source of municipal GHG emissions was lighting, resulting in 360 MTC02e or 41% of total emissions. Building energy from both electricity and natural gas usage contributed 18% of total emissions, emitting 160 MTC02e. Other significant sectors are water pumping ( 120 MTC02e) and government-generated solid waste (90 MTC02e), which make up 14% and I 0% of total GHG emissions, respectively. The remaining 17% of emissions derives from employee commute and travel (80 MTC02e), municipal fleet vehicles (60 MTC02e), and off-road equipment (I 0 MTC02e). CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • " APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Figure B-2: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector Fl eet 7% Ligh t ing'- 41 % " Off-Road Eq uipm ent __ _ 1% Bui ldi ng Ene r gy 18 % Emp loyee Commute & T rave l 9% Governmen t - / G ener ated So lid Waste 10% \_Water Pump ing 14% Table 8-3: Municipal GHG Emissions by Sector Sector Percentage of Total Build ing Energ y 160 18% Off-Roa d Equipment 10 1% Fl eet 60 7% Lighting 360 41 o/o Emp loyee Co m mute an d Trave l 80 9% Go vernment-Gen era t ed So lid Was t e 90 1 Oo/o Water Pumping 120 14% Total* 880 100% * Due to rounding, the to tal may not eq ual th e sum of comp onent ports. DETAILED ANALYSIS BY SECTOR Much like the community inventory, the municipal inventory has multiple subsectors that are included in each sector reported in Table B-3. Detailed activity data for each municipal subsector and its individual contribution to GHG emissions are shown in Table B-4 . CI TY OF HMPLE CITY APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Table 8-4: Detailed Municipal Activity Data and GHG Emissions Subsector Activity Data Unit Buildings -Electricity 350,450 kWh 100 Buildings-Natural Gas 11 '190 Therms 60 Buildings Stationary Diesel 360 Gallons <10 Off-Road Equipment-Gasoline 130 Gallons <10 Off-Road Equipment-Mix Gasoline 500 Gallons 10 Fleet-Gasoline 4,230 Gallons 40 Fleet-CNG 2,190 Gallons 20 Lighting-Streetlights 464,260 kWh 140 Lighting-Traffic Lights 88,990 kWh 30 Lighting -SCE-Owned Streetlights 643,870 kWh 190 Lighting -Other Public Lights 1,270 kWh <10 Water Pumping 397,740 kWh 120 Employee Travel 3,990 VMT <10 Employee Commute 205,070 VMT 80 Government-Generated Solid Waste 500 Tons 90 Total* 880 * Due to rounding, the total may not equal the sum of component parts. RELATION TO COMMUNITY-WIDE INVENTORY Municipal emissions account for less than I % of community-wide emissions, as shown in Figure B-3. Municipal GHG emissions are considered a subset of community-wide GHG emissions since the majority of municipal activities occur within the boundaries of Temple City. This categorization means that all municipal operations are included in the commercial, industrial, transportation, waste, or other categories of this community-wide inventory as applicable. For example, electricity use by City buildings is part of the community-wide commercial energy sector. Similar to the way in which businesses and factories perform their own facility-scale GHG inventories, the municipal operations emissions inventory analyzes municipal emissions in more detail in order to help the City assess and identify its major sources of GHGs. Figure B-3 shows the relative scale of municipal and community-wide emissions. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Ill " APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Figure 8-3: Municipal and Community-Wide GHG Emissions Community -Wide Emissions 99% BUSINESS-AS-USUAL FORECAST Municipal Emissions <I% A business-as-usual (BAU) forecast is an estimate of how GHG emissions will grow over time without influence from state, regional, and local reduction efforts. This BAU emissions forecast assumes 2006 energy consumption, waste disposal , and energy efficiency rates and focuses on two target years: 2020 and 2035. The 2020 target year is estimated for consistency with AB 32 targets and 2035 is studied for consistency with the Senate Bill 375 horizon. COMMUNITY BAU INDICATORS Table B-5 below lists the various growth indicators and sources used in the forecasting of Temple City's community-wide emissions. All indicators for 2020 and 2035, except those used for transportation, are from the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) Proposed Final 2012 Regiona l Transportation Plan (RTP). For the estimation of jobs in the baseline year, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is applied between 2003 and 2020 to estimate the baseline year employment. The 2003 RTP was used for all cities with a baseline year before 2008. Residential energy use is tied to the number of households within city limits for the target years. Similarly, commercial and industrial energy use emissions are assumed to grow with the number of jobs. Growth in waste emissions Is based on the total service population ofT emple City as this population includes projected residential, commercial, and industrial growth. Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants used SCAG's 2003 RTP travel model to forecast the growth in VMT. Fehr & Peers compared population, household, and jobs forecasts from the 2003 RTP model with comparable data sources to confirm the accuracy of the VMT forecasts . Since the 2003 RTP travel model forecasts were highe r than Fehr & Peers' 5% adjustment margin of error, Fehr & Peers modified the City's VMT forecasts based on the US Census and the 2003 SCAG RTP model. The most recent population and employment forecasts for the city are somewhat higher than the SCAG travel model for both 2003 and 2035, leading Fehr & Peers to adjust the 2008 and 2035 VMT data with adjustment factors of 16.1% and 22%, respectively . Using the 2003 RTP travel model, Fehr & Peers calculated VMT for 2003 and 2035, and estimated VMT for 20 I 0 and 2020. In order to calculate data for the City's baseline year of 2006, annual VMT was CITY Of HMPLE CITY APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST interpolated using the CAGR from 2003 to 2035. For consistency with the 2006 calculation, VMT for 20 I 0 and 2020 was re-calculated using the CAGR. Table 8-S: BAU Growth Indicators and Affected Sectors Emissions Sector 2010 2020 Sources Commercial/ 201 0 Census, Jobs Industrial 5,850 6,700 7,000 7,300 SCAG 2012 Energy RTP, SCAG 2003 RTP Service Solid Waste, 2010 Census, Population Water, 41,180 42,260 43,900 46,300 SCAG 2012 (Residents+ Wastewater RTP Jobs) Residential 2010 Census, Households Energy, Off-11,520 11,610 12,300 13,000 SCAG 2012 Road Equipment RTP On-Road Fehr & Peers, Annual VMT Transportation 528,570 533,240 545,100 563,380 SCAG2003 RTP COMMUNITY BUSINESS-AS-USUAL FORECAST Table B-6 and Figure B-4 summarize the growth forecast of GHG em1ss1ons by activity sector without any actions or policies in place to reduce GHG emissions. Under the BAU growth scenario, emissions are estimated to grow by 7% in 2020 to 199,500 MTC02e and by I I% from baseline to 205,920 MTC02e in 2035. Table 8-6: Community BAU Emissions by Sector Sector Res idential Energy Commercial/Industrial Energy Direct Access Electricity Street & Traffi c Lighting On -Road Transportation Waste Off-Road Equipment Wate r Wastewater 47,140 16,850 3,240 5,970 98,830 6,270 2,720 4,410 890 2010 MTC01e 44,780 16,190 2,450 5,970 97,000 5,330 1,460 4,360 880 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 MTC01e 50,350 20,170 3,880 5,970 101 ,920 6,690 4,750 4,700 950 2035 MTC01e 53,220 21,050 4,050 5,970 105,340 7,050 3,400 4,960 1,000 • APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Assembly Bill 1493 (Pavley). Signed into law in 2002, AB 1493 requires carmakers to reduce GHG emissions from new passenger cars and light trucks beginning in 20 II. Regulations were adopted by CARB in 2004 and took effect in 2009 w ith the release of a waiver from the US Environmental Protection Agency granting California the right to implement the bill. CARB anticipates that the Pavley standards will reduce GHG emissions from California passenger vehicles by approximately 22% in 2012 a nd by around 30% in 2016, all while improving fuel efficiency and reducing motorists' costs. The car industry is well on its way to meeting these efficiency targets. Renewables Portfolio Standard. Established in 2002 in Senate Bill I 078, the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) targets utility providers to increase the portion of energy that comes from renewable sources to 20% by 20 I 0 and to 33% by 2020. A June 2009 report from the California Public Utilities Commission indicated that it is unlikely that the state and its investor-owned utilities will be able to reach the RPS goal of 33% by 2020; according to state assessments, the forecast assumes that energy providers w ill achieve a 28% renewable portfolio by 2020. California Building Code Title 24. Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations mandates how each new home and business is built in California . It includes requirements for the structural , plumbing, electrical, and mechanical systems of buildings and for fire and life safety, energy conservation, green design , and accessibility in and around buildings . The 20 I 0 triennial edition of Title 24 pertains to all occupancies that applied for a building permit on or after January I, 20 I I, and remains in effect until the effective date of the 2013 triennial edition. This Inventory focuses on two sections of Title 24: Part 6 (the California Energy Code) and Part II (the California Green Building Standards Code). These two s ections require direct electricity, natural gas , and water savings for every new home or business built in California. Title 24 is a statewide standard applied at the local level by local agencies through project review. This Inventory incorporates the net energy benefit of new Title 24 requirements that did not exist in the baseline year. These estimates are based on California Energy Commission studies that compare each new update of Title 24 to its former version. The AB 32 Seeping Plan calls for ongoing triennial updates to Title 24 that yield regular increases in mandatory energy and water savings for new construction. As such, the GHG forecast also includes a conservative estimate of the energy and water reductions due to future updates of Title 24 based on historic growth rates. The energy reductions quantified in the forecast from Part 6 Energy Code updates are based on the assumption that the triennial updates to the code will yield regular decreases in the maximum allowable amount of energy used from new construction. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. The Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) calls for CARS to achieve a reduction of at least I 0% in the carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by 2020. A prelimina ry injunction was issued in December 20 I I, which required implementation of the LCFS to be put on hold . CARS is currently appealing the decision. Until the legal standing of the program has been resolved, the LCFS will not be considered in the adjusted bus iness-as-usual (ABAU) forecast. California Solar Initiative. The California Solar Initiative (CSI) is a state program that provides cash rebates for the installation of an electric solar panel system. In order to qual ify, the customer must buy electricity from one of California's three investor-owned utilities (SCE , Pacific Gas and Electric, or San Diego Gas & Electric). CITY OF TEMPLE C IT Y APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST Community ABAU Forecast All of the State programs highlighted above are included in the community-wide ABAU forecast. As shown in Table B-8 and Table B-9, these state reduction efforts are anticipated to reduce emissions by 23,5 I 0 MTC02e in 2020 and 37,220 MTC02e in 2035 . The majority of these reductions are from the Pavley standards and the RPS . In comparison to the BAU scenario, Table B-9 shows 2020 emissions with state reduction measures are 6% below baseline 2006 levels rather than 7% above baseline 2006 levels. Similarly, 2035 emissions go from I I% above baseline levels to 9% below baseline levels after state efforts are taken into account. Table B-8: Impact of State Policies on Community GHG Emissions I State Reductions Summary Pavley Reducti o ns -15,730 -24,370 RPS Redu ction s -6,270 -10,430 CA Building Co de Reduction s -1,420 -2 ,340 CSI Reductions -90 -80 Total State Reductions* -23,510 -37,220 * Due to rounding, the t ota l may not e qual the sum of comp on ent pa rts . Table B-9: Comparison of Community BAU and ABAU Forecast State Reductions Summary Growth Projection 186,320 178,420 199,350 205,990 Total St ate Reduction s -23,510 -37,220 Adjusted BAU Forecast (2020 , 2035)* 186,320 178,420 175,840 168,770 Percentage Change from 2006 -4% -6% -9% * Due to rou nding, th e tot al m ay not equal th e sum of co mp onent parts . State reductions from baseline and 20 I 0 were not quantified because the effects of those programs are already reflected in the activity data collected. For example, the efforts to increase the amount of clean energy in electricity through RPS are already captured in the emissions coefficients used to translate electricity use into MTC02e. Municipal ABAU Forecast Only certain state reduction programs affect the municipal BAU forecast. These include the RPS and the Pavley standards. Since no new buildings are planned to be built, updates to the California Building Code Standards, such as Title 24, and the CSI are not applicable to Temple C ity and are not quantified. Table CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST B-1 0 shows the effect of the included state reduction efforts and Table B-1 I shows how this changes the BAU emissions. Emissions in 2020 are reduced by 90 MTC02e in 2020 and ISO MTC02e in 2035 solely from the RPS and the Pavley standards. With state reduction measures, 2020 emissions are 9% below baseline 2006 levels compared to I% above baseline 2006 levels in the BAU scenario. Similarly, 2035 emissions go from I% above baseline to 16% below basel ine after state efforts are taken into account. Table B-1 0: Impact of State Policies on Municipal GHG Emissions State Reductions Summary Pavley Redu ctions -20 -30 RPS Reductions -70 -120 CA Building Code Reductions 0 0 CS I Reductions 0 0 Total State Reductions* -90 -150 * Due to rounding. the t otal may not equal the sum of component ports . Table 8-11: Comparison of Municipal BAU and ABAU Forecast State Reductions Summary Growth Projection Total State Reductions Adjusted BAU Forecast (2020, 2035)* Percentage Change from 2006 880 880 0% * Due to rounding , the total may not equa l the sum of com ponent ports . REDUCTION TARGETS 890 890 1% 2020 MTCO ze 890 -90 800 -9% 890 -150 740 -16% The next step is for the City to determine energy reduction targets for 2020 and 2035 . The new energy reduction targets will be the goal of the EAP and a quantitative way of measuring the Plan's success. The EAP's energy reduction targets will set the groundwork for any GHG reduction targets found in a future climate action plan . STATE-RECOMMENDED 2020 AND 2035 REDUCTION TARGETS While the state reductions represent a significant decrease in emissions, AB 32 recommends that local governments adopt a GHG reduction target of 15% below baseline (2005 to 2008) levels by 2020. The State has not adopted GHG reduction targets beyond 2020; however, in 2005, then-Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S-3-05 that created a goal to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. While not legislatively mandated, it is anticipated CITY OF TEMf'L[ CITY APPENDIX B GHG INVENTORY AND FORECAST that the State will adopt targets similar to those included in Executive O rder S-3-05 after the state's ach ievement of the 2020 target can be better evaluated. As shown in Table B-12, the C ity would need to facilitate an additional I 0% reduction in community- wide emissions to meet t he AB 32 Scoping Plan GHG reduction goal for 2020. In GHG emissions, this I 0% reduction translates to a reduction of 17,470 MTC02e below ABAU emissions in 2020. Similarly, to be on a trajectory toward the Executive Order S-3-05 target for 2050, the City would need to reduce community-wide emissions 50%, or 84,930 MTC02e, by 2035 . Table B-12: Community GHG Emissions and State-Recommended Reduction Targets 2020 2035 State-Recommended Reduction Targets (percentage below baseline) 15 % 55% State-Recommended Emissions Goal (MTC02e) 158,370 83,840 ABAU Forecast with State Reductions (MTC02e) 175,840 168,770 Local Reduction Needed from Adjusted BAU (MTC02el -17,470 -84,930 The State-recommended reduction targets for community-wide GHG emissions can also be applied to municipal operations. Table B-13 below outlines the State-recommended reduction targets and necessary reductions the City would need to facilitate in order to meet the recommended goals for 2020 and 2035. Municipal emissions in 2006 are forecasted to reach 50 MTC02e above the state- recommended reduction targets for 2020. It is important to remember, however, that state reduction programs are not guaranteed to be fully implemented, much like the LCFS . Local action by city facility and fleet managers are the best way to reach a 15% reduction below baseline levels in 2020. Table 8-13: Municipal GHG Emissions and State-Recommended Reduction Targets 2020 2035 State-Recommended Reduction Targets (percentage below baseline) 15% 55% State-Recommended Emiss ions Goal (MTC0 2e) 750 400 ABAU Forecast with State Reduct ions (MTC02e) 800 740 Local Reduction Needed from Adjusted BAU (MTC02el -so -340 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • APPENDIXC • APPENDIX C: GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT This technical appendix provides a summary of the data sources, assumptions, and performance metrics utilized in this Energy Action Plan (EAP) to quantify the estimated kilowatt-hours (kWh) savings and greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions. The sources and metrics are organized by policy and rely on four primary types of data and research: (I) the city's GHG emissions inventory and forecast, (2) government agency tools and reports, (3) case studies in similar jurisd ictions, and (4) scholarly research . The baseline GHG inventory and forecast serve as the foundation for quantifying the City's GHG reduction policies. Activity data from the inventory, e.g., vehicle miles traveled and kWh of electricity, is combined with the performance targets and indicators identified in this Plan to calculate the reduction benefit of each policy. This approach ensures that the City's kWh savings and GHG reductions are tied to the baseline and future activities that are actually occurring in the city. Whenever possible, emissions reduction estimates are based on tools and reports provided by government agencies such as the US Environmental Protection Agency, California Environmental Protection Agency, California Energy Commission (CEC), California Air Resources Board (CARB), California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), and local air districts. If accurate reduction estimates are not available through these tools, a case study may be used if the case study is comparable to the conditions in the city. Finally, for reduction measures that lack actual on-the-ground testing or analysis, current scholarly and peer-reviewed research is combined with knowledge of existing City practices to create an estimate of potential kWh and GHG reductions. Table C-1 outlines the sources of activity data for the community-wide GHG inventory and Table C-2 shows the sources for municipal inventory activity data. Table C-3 and Table C-4 list the specific emissions coefficients used for each piece of activity data and GHG emissions as shown in Appendix 8 as well as those used in the quantification presented below in Table C-5 . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY " APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT T a b le C -1: Commu nity Activity Data Sou rces Subsector Residential Electricity Residential Natural Gas Commercial/In d ustrial El ectricity Commercial/Industrial Natural Gas Direct Access Electr icity Street & Traffic Lighting On-Road Transportation W aste -Solid Waste Waste -Green Waste Waste -Transformed Off-Road Equipment Water Wastewater Source Southern California Ed ison Southern C aliforn ia Gas Company Southern California Edis o n Southern California Gas C o mpany Southern California Edison Southern C alifornia Edison Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants; SCAG 2003 RTP C a iRecycle onl ine Disposal Reporting System C a iRe cycle onli ne Disposal Reporting System Ca iRecycl e onl ine Disposal Reporting System C alifornia Air Resources Boar d 's O FFROAD2007 model PMC's San Gabriel Valley Regional Water Model PMC's San Gabriel Valley Regional Water Model T able C -2: Mu nici p a l Activity Dat a Source s Subsector Buildings - Electricity Bu il dings -Natural Gas Buildings -Stationary Diesel Off-Road Equ ipment Fuel Use Fleet Fuel Use Public Ligh t ing Electricity Water a nd Wastewater Pumping Electricity Employee Commute Government-Generate d Solid Waste Source Southern C aliforni a Edison Southe rn Cal iforn ia Gas Company C ity records C ity recor d s C ity reco r d s Southe rn Californ ia Ed ison Southern Califo rnia Ed iso n Online City survey completed by C ity employees City records T able C-3: Emissions Fa ct ors a nd Sources, 2 006 Subsector Original Emissions Factor Source Final Emissions Factor 641 .26 lbsCOiMWh LG O Pvl.l, Table G.6 SCE Electricity 0.031 lbs CHJ MWh LGOPv l.l , Table 0 .00029 MTC02 e/kWh G .7 0.009 lbs NP/MWh LG O P v 1.1, Table G .7 Dire ct Access 889.75 lb s COJ MWh LGOP vi. I, Table 0.00041 MTC02e /kWh CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Subsector Original Emissions Factor Source Final Emissions Factor Electricity G.7 0.031 lbs CHJ MWh LGOP vi. I, Table G.7 0 .009 lbs NP/MWh LGOPvl.l , Table G.7 53 .06 kg C02/MMBtu LGOPvl.l , Table G. I SoCal Gas -Natural 0 .005 kgCHJMMBtu LGOP vi. I, Table 0.00532 MTC02e/therm Gas G .3 0 .0001 kg N 20/MMBtu LGOP vl.l, Table G.3 10.21 lbs COigallon LGOP vi. I. Table G. I Stationary Diesel 0 .0015 lbs CHigallon LGOP vi. I , Tabl e 0.0 1027 MTC02 e /gallon G.4 0.0001 lbs Np/gallon LGOP vi. I , Table G.4 8.78 kg C02/gallon LGOPvl.l . Table 0 .00878 MTCOigallon G . II Fleet Gasoline .0107-gCHJmile* LGOPvl.l, Table .0107-gCHJmile* .4090 G .l2 .4090 .0038-gNp/mile* LGOPvl.l , Table .0038-g N2 0/mile* .1726 G .l2 .1726 10.21 kg C02/gallon LGOPvl.l , Table 0 .01021 MTC02/gallon G. II Fleet D iesel .0005-gCHJmile* LGOPvl.l , Table .0005 -g CHJ mile* .0051 G.l2 .0051 .0012-g N 20/mile* LGOPvl.l, Table .0012-gNP/mile* .0048 G.l2 .0048 0 .054 kg C02/scf LGOPvl.l , Table 0.000054 MTC02/scf G. II Fleet CNG 0 .737 gCHJmile LGOP vi. I, Table G.l3 LGOP vi. I, Table 0 .000031 MTC02e/mile 0.05 gNp/mile G.l3 5 .59 kg COigallon LGOP vl .l, Table 0 .00559 MTC02/gallon G. II Fleet LPG 0 .037 g CHJmile LGOP vi. I, Table G.l3 LGOPvl.l , Table 0 .000022 MTC02e /mile 0.067 gNp/mile G.l3 505 .5 g C02/mile EMFAC 2011 On-Road Fehr & Peers 0.00053 MTC02e/mile Transportation 1.05 C02e/C02 Transportation Consultants CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Subsector Off-Ro ad Const ru cti on Off-Ro ad Lawn and Garden Original Emissions Factor 825 tons COi day in LA County 0 .0989 tons CHJday in LA County 0 .000 7 tons N 20/day in LA County 8 .03 t ons C02/day in LA County 0 .0148 tons CHJ day in LA County 0 .0063 tons N 20/day in LA County * Dependent on ve hicle's model yea r and size. Source OFFROAD2007 OFFROAD2007 OFFROAD2007 OFFROAD2007 OFFROAD2007 OFFROAD2007 Final Emissions Factor 273 ,900 MTC02e/year in LA County 3.4 10 MTC02e/year in LA County Table C -4:Emissions Factors and Sources, 2010 Subsector Original Emissions Factor Source Final Emissions Factor 630 .89 lbs COi MWh LGOPvl.l, Table G.6 SCE Electr icity* 0.029 lbs CHJMWh LGOP vi. I, Table 0 .00029 MTC02e /kWh G .7 0 .01 lbs NP/MWh LGOP vl.l , Table G.7 919 .64 lb s C02/MWh LGOP v i. I, Table G .7 Direct Access 0.029 lbs CH~/MWh LGOP vI. I , Tab le 0 .00042 MTC02 e/kWh Electricity* G.7 0 .01 lbs NP/MWh LGOP v 1.1 , Table G.7 53 .06 kg LGOP vi. I, Table C02/MMBtu G . I SoCal Gas -Natural 0.005 kgCHJ MMBtu LGOP vi. I , Table 0 .00532 MTC02 e/therm Gas G.3 0 .0001 kg LGOPvl.l, Table NP/MMBtu G.3 10.21 lbs COhallon LGOP vi. I, Table G. I Stationary Diesel 0 .0015 lbs CHJgallon LGOP vl .l, Table 0.01027 MTC02 e/gallon G.4 0.0001 lbs N20/gallon LGOP vi. I, Ta ble G .4 8.78 kgCOi Gallon LGOP vi. I, Table 0 .00878 MTCOigallon G .ll Fleet Gasoline .0107-g CHJmile** LGOP vi. I, Table .0107-g CHJ mile** .4090 G .l2 .4090 .0038-g N 20/mile** LGOP vi. I , Table .0038-g N20/mile** .1726 G .l2 .1726 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Subsector Original Emissions Factor Source Final Emissions Factor 10.21 kg CO/gallon LGOP vi. I, Table 0 .01021 MTCOigallon G.ll Fleet Diesel .0005-gCHJmile** LGOPvl.l, Table .0005-g CHJmile** .0051 G.l2 .0051 .0012-g N20/mile** LGOPvl .l, Table .0012-g N20/mile** .0048 G.l2 .0048 0.054 kg COzfscf LGOPvl.l, Table 0 .000054 MTC02/scf G.ll Fleet CNG 0.737 gCHJmile LGOPvl.l , Table G.l3 LGOPvl.l , Table 0 .000031 MTC02e/mile 0 .05 g N20/mile G.l3 5 .59 kg CO/gallon LGOP v 1.1. Table 0 .00559 MTCOigallon G. II Fleet LPG 0.037 g CHJmile LGOPvl.l, Table G.l3 LGOPvl.l, Table 0.000022 MTC02 e/mile 0.067 gNp/mile G.l3 491 .8 g C02/mile EMFAC 2011 On-Road Fehr & Peers 0.00052 MTC02 e/mile Transportation 1.05 C02e/C02 Transportation Consultants 879 tons C02/day OFFROAD2007 in LA County Off-Road 0 .0853 tons CHiday OFFROAD2007 291,660 MTC02e/year in Construction in LA County LA County 0.0007 tons N20/day OFFROAD2007 in LA County 8.97 tons COzfday OFFROAD2007 in LA County Off-Road Lawn and 0.0144 tons CHJday OFFROAD2007 3,690 MTC02e/year in Garden in LA County LA County 0.0061 tons N2 0/day OFFROAD2007 in LA County * 20 I 0 factors not available. 2007 factors used as a proxy. ** Dependent on vehicle's model year and size . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • APPEND IX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT T a ble C-5: Electricity and Emiss ions Reductions and Methods by Polic y, 2020 Policy: Implementation Actions : Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department( s): Appl icable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): 1.1: Promote energy conservation in existing residential st ructures through education and outreach. • Partner with community groups to identify culture-specific approaches to comm unicating the benefits of energy conservation and to promote the policies in t h is Energy Action Plan . • Partner with the Temple C ity Unified School District to highlight the district's recent sustainability efforts, an d to integrate energy efficiency curriculum and projects in educational and after-school programs . • Continue electricity efficiency education and outreach with the Energy Leader Partnership at community events. • Update the City's website ro encourage resident participation in utility-provided smart meter monitoring programs. • Lead a comparative information-based outreach campaign that allows residents to evaluate their current electricity use against city and historic averages. Consider incl uding incentives based on performance. • Form Platin um Energy Lead er p r o gram, a ll owing Ci t y st aff to volu nteer to conduct e d ucational o utreach at schools. special community events, and local community groups. Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline residential electricity use by 2020. -374,750 to -899,390 -I 00 to -230 I 30 kWh to 2 00 kWh 2,880 to 4,6 10 participating househol d s CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: I 1.1 : Promote energy conservation in existing residential structures through education and outreach. Although the Bonneville Power Admini stration is not California based, its 20 II report provides several national energy efficiency-related behavioral change p r ogram case studies. No Califo rnia-based case studies were available at the time o f this report. BPA reports a 2-3% reduction per partic ipant in normative information-based outre ach efforts. BPA notes that although reductions are somewhat small in programs like this, participation levels a r e often high. Note that the quantified reductions in th is policy relate most directly to actions three and four as well as other actions in this EAP that e ncourage electricity r e porting and monitoring. Other actions in this pol icy will likely lead to further reductions. BPA (Bonneville Power Administration). 20 II. Residential Behavior Based Energy Efficiency Program Profiles 20 II . http://www.bpa.gov/Energy/n/pdf/BBEE_Res_Profiles_Dec_20 ll .pdf. 1.2: Reduce energy use and plug load demand through upgrades to household appliances and equipment. • Promote upgrades of residential and recreational pool pumps to more efficient, variable-speed pump models. • Promote existing energy efficiency rebate offerings for appliances, refrigeration units, heating. ventilation equipment, and lighting fixtures as programs become available, including rebates from the California Energy Commission and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. • Promote participation of in-home monitoring programs provided by SCE and the use of smart-grid integrated appliances. • Consider creation of a municipal revolving loan fund for a community appliance tra de-in rebate program. Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline residential electricity use by 2020. -374,060 to -842,930 -100 to -220 190 to 250 kWh for households; I ,030 to I ,720 kWh for home pools CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Ill APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT I Policy: Performance T arget(s) (2020): Reduction Method: Reduction Source s: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department{s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): 1.2: Reduce energy use and plug load demand through upgrades to household appliances and equipment. I, 720 to 2,820 participating households; I 00 to 140 partic ipating home pools Using the C alifornia Res ide ntial Appli a nce Saturation Study, th e most common appli a nce s and the ir yearly ave rage el ectricity use were combined to crea t e a mode l of how much electricity was used by applia nces in Temple C ity households in 2006. Because pools are such a larger consumer of energy, this us e w as separated out using Lo s Angeles County parcel dat a records of number of pools located on single-family homes. Assumed high and low reductions were then a pplied w ith assumed participation rate ra nges for single-family and multi-family households. Since it is unlikely that all participants will purchase all quantified appliances, a target utilization rate was applied to the final reduction numbers. CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 20 I 0 . Quantifying Greenhou se Gas Mitigation Meas ures. http://capcoa.org/wp-content!uploads/20 I 0/ II /CAPCOA- Quantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf. KEMA, Inc. 2009 California Residential Appliance Saturation Study, Volume 2 : Results . CEC-200-2010-004. 1.3: Support owner-occupied whole house renovations that reduce energy use and improve thermal comfort of existing residential buildings. • Encourage residents to participate in SCE-funded retrofit programs such as Energy Upgrade California. • Explore creation of a municipal revolving loan program that could provide small loans to local homeowners to assist them with the cost of energy efficiency improvements. • Consider funding residential energy audits for representative building types in mature neighborhoods to highlight and promote energy efficiency opportunities. • Include energy-efficient retrofit as an eligible improvement type in the City ofT emple City Home Improvement Program. Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline residential electricity use by 2020. -I ,540,170 to -8,422.780 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: 1.3: Support owner-occupied whole house renovations that reduce energy use a!'~ impro_\l_e_thermal comfort of ex!sting residential buildings. -400 to -2,160 1,480 kWh to 2,590 kWh I ,040 to 3,250 participating single-family households (constructed after 1939) High and low reductions from Los Angeles County Energy Upgrade California project case studies were multiplied by assumed participation rate ranges. Since Policy 1.4 covers multi-family housing units, this policy only quantifies reductions in single-family housing units built after 1939. Build ing Doctors. Los Angeles CA Home Energy Performance Assessment. 20 I I . REAS , Inc . (Residential Energy Assessment Services), Inc . 20 I I. Encino CA Home Energy Assessment. REAS , Inc . (Residential Energy Assessment Services), Inc . 20 I I. San Fernando CA Home Ene rgy Performance Assessment. p r . 1.4: Support renovations that reduce energy use and improve thermal 0 •cy. comfort in existing multi-family units and buildings. Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicab le Reduction Target: • Work with property management agencies and condominium homeowner associations to encourage retrofits. Promote retrofits through targeted outreach to the city's affordable and senior housing projects. • Work with Southern California Edison and the Energy Leader Partnership to promote free-to low-cost retrofit opportunities to property owners of multi-family apartment buildings to improve the community's multi-family hous ing stock. • Identify and promote affordable tenant improvement opportunities such as lighting upgrades. • Create a priority list of the largest multi-family residential properties and conduce targeted outreach. Mid-Term Community Development and Publ ic Services Achieve a I 0% reduction below basel ine residential electricity use by 2020. CITY OF rEMPLE CI T Y Ill " APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: 1.4: Support renovations that reduce energy use and improve thermal comfort in existing multi-family units and buildings. -209,130 to -331 ,120 -SO to -90 210 kWh to 270 kWh 980 to I ,240 participating multi-family households Obtained a range of reductions from several multi-family retrofit project case studies (primarily for HV AC replacement, and HYAC distribution system retrofits). A high and low average reduction per unit was applied to the target participation rate to calculate community- wide reductions. Note that the case studies are for 2-to 3-unit buildings . Reductions may have wide variability in other types of multi- family housing developments. EECBG Project Summary. 2012. Elk Grove Multi Family Retrofit Projects (not published). 1.5: Encourage energy-efficient improvements in the city's historic housing stock. Update the City's Energy Efficiency website and prepare brochu res to share information regarding energy efficiency upgrades and retrofits appropriate for historic bu ildings. " Consider creation of a pi lot program to fund energy audits and identify appropriate energy efficiency upgrades for the city's historic styles, including Craftsman, Spanish Colon ial Revival , Tudor Revival , French Revolution , Streamline Moderne, and Mid -Century Modern. Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline residential electricity use by 2020 . CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): ' 2.1: Educate Temple City's businesses about opportunities to conserve ~!'er_9y use_ and rediJ.Ce costs through be_ha_v!_oral changes in daily operations. • Consider language-and culture-sensitive/specific outreach programs. • Highlight energy-efficient behavioral changes implemented by local businesses as case studies for the community on the City's website and at permit counters. Partner with the Temple City Chamber of Commerce to highlight available conservation actions and energy efficiency programs to business and property owners. • Encourage building and facility managers to participate in energy- monitoring programs that inform energy use decisions and reduce peak energy demand such as SCE's Demand Response Program. • Educate business owners about nonresidential energy use disclosure requirements (AB II 03). Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline nonresidential electricity use by 2020. 2.2: Support the use of energy-efficient appliances and equipment in leased and owner-occupied businesses. • Promote rebates for manufacturing and commercial activities, including SCE rebates through the Energy Management Solutions Program for cooking and refrigeration appliances, lighting, and manufacturing equipment. • Create a standardized tenant improvement checklist and informational materials to address and encourage the installation of Energy Star and/or smart-grid integrated appliances in nonresidential development. Near-Term Community Development and Public Services Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline nonresidential electricity use by 2020. -I ,347,960 to -2,396,370 -370 to -660 II ,950 to 15,930 kWh per participating nonresidential building II 0 to 150 participating nonresidential buildings CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Ill II APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: 2.2: Support the use of energy-efficient appliances and equipment in leased and owner-occupied businesses. Usi ng the C a liforni a End-Use Survey (CEUS), the average percentage of electricity used by typical commercial and industrial appliances (water heating, cooking. refrigeration, equipment, and motors) was applied to the large building nonresidential electricity kWh used in Temple City. kWh consumption by retrofit item was calculated by applying the CEUS figure s for percentage of electricity cons umed by each item . These kWh figures were then multiplied by the Brown et al. (2008) reduction by appliance estimates to calculate total kWh reductions by item, which were then summed t o calculate overall reductions. A utilization rate was applied to the overall reductions because it is unlikely that each participant will upgrade every component of their building. Brown, Rich, Sam Borgeson. Jon Koomey, and Peter Biermayer. 2008. US Building-Sector Energy Efficiency Potential. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California. http://enduse.lbl.gov/info /LBNL-I 096E.pdf. ICLEI -Local Governments for Sustainabili ty. 2012. Climate and Air Pollution Planning Ass is tant (CAPPA) Version 1.5. ltron, Inc . 2007. California Commercial End-use Survey -Results Page . http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor. 20 12 . Los Angeles County Parcel Viewer. Los Angeles. http://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/mapping/viewer.asp . CITY OF TeMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s}: Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): Reduction Method: 2 .3 : Facilitate retrofits and energy efficiency improvements within the nonresidential building stock. • Wor k w ith Lo s Angeles County and other regi o nal public o r p r iv at e entities to create a revolving loan fund to support nonresi d e ntial retrofits. • Partner with Temple City Chamber of Commerce to id e nt ify lo ca l community banks and/or credit unions to promote and suppo rt low- interest energy efficiency loans or financing progra ms for nonresidential energy efficiency retrofits. • Educate property and business owners on feas ible options fo r retrofit-specific energy efficiency financing, includ ing Lo s Angeles County Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financ ing. integration of energy efficiency retrofit projects into ca pital le ase structures, and mortgage refinancing. • Develop a shared landlord-tenant program to support the financing of energy efficiency retrofits to renter-occupied buildings . • Distribute informational packet about nonresidential financing and opportunities in business license application and renewal interactions. • Educate nonresidential building owners about the savings potentials from retrocommissioning, retrofits, and deep retrofits. Mid-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline nonresidential electricity use by 2020. -I ,424,350 to -3,572,550 -390 to -980 15 ,150 to 27,150 kWh per participating nonresidential building 90 to 130 nonresidential buildings Using the California End-Use Survey (CEUS), the average percentage of electricity used on the building envelope and lighting (heating, cooling, and lighting) was applied to the large building nonresidential electricity kWh used in Temple City. kWh consumption by retrofit item was calculated by applying the CEUS figures for percentage of electricity consumed by each item. These kWh figures were then multiplied by the Brown et al. (2008) reduction by appliance estimates to calcul ate total kWh reductions by item, which were then summed to calculate overall reductions. A utilization rate was applied to the overall reductions because it is unlik ely that each participant will upgrade every component of their building. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY II II APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Sources: Policy: Implementation Actions: Impl ementation Time Frame: Impl ementation Department{s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Re du ctions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): 2.3: Facilitate retrofits and energy efficiency improvements within the nonresidential building stock. Brown, Rich, Sam Borgeson, Jon Koomey, and Peter Biermayer. 2008. US Building-Sector Energy Efficiency Potential. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Unive rsity of California. http://enduse.lbl.gov/info/L BNL-I 096E.pdf. ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability. 2012. Climate and Air Pollution Planning Assistant (CAPPA) Version 1.5. ltron, Inc . 2007. California Commercial End-Use Survey-Results Page . http://capabilities.it ron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor. 2012. Los Angeles County Parcel Viewer. Los Angeles . http://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/mapping/viewer.as p . 3.1: Support the integration of energy efficiency upgrades as part of new building construction, remodels, or tenant improvements. • Work with project applicants to design and orient buildings that are energy-efficient and consistent with communit y character. • Develop and share resources and materials to support consumer education on energy-efficient and sustainable materials . • Encourage p roject applicants to participate in SCE's "Savings by Desig n" Program. • Adopt the voluntary energy efficiency guidelines a nd use an energy efficiency checklist to help applicants identify cost-effective measures for projects (see Appendix D). Mid-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below ba seli ne nonresi dentia l electricity use by 2020. -111 ,770 to -167,660 -30 to -40 200 kWh per new household and 1,980 to 2,980 kWh per participating new nonresidentia l build ing 340 new households and 20 new nonresidential bui ldi ngs CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): 3.1: Support the integration of energy efficiency upgrades as part of new building construction, remodels, or tenant improvements. Quantification for this policy uses California Department of Energy's increased estimates for Title 12 energy efficiency updates. The percentage of kWh that exceeds expected standards is applied to forecast electricity use increases for residential homes between 20 14 and 2020 (when new standards are likely to be adopted). These increased standards can be used as a proxy for additional new development as energy efficiency increases. Brook M., B. Chrisman, P. David, T . Ealey, D . Eden , K. Moore, K. Rider, P. Strait, G . D. Taylor, and J. Wu. 20 II. Draft Staff Report: Achieving Energy Savings in California Buildings ( 11-IEP-1 F). California Energy Commission, Efficiency and Renewables Division. Publication number: CEC-400-2011-007-SD. California Energy Commission. 20 12. 20 13 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/20 13standards/rulemaking/documents/ 20 12-5-31-ltem-05-Adoption_Hearing_Presentation.pdf. ltron , Inc . 2007. California Commercial End-Use Survey-Results Page. http://capabilities .itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. KEMA, Inc . 20 [ 0. 2009 California Residential Appliance Saturation Study, Volume 2: Results . CEC-200-20 l 0-004. 3.2: Encourage the use of energy-efficient appliances and equipment in new buildings. • Encourage project applicants to install energy-efficient appliances within new and renovated buildings by highlighting the potential cost savings to project applicants and property owners. • Use the City's model energy efficiency code to support the use of smart-grid and Energy Star appliances in new development. Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below baseline nonresidential electricity use by 2020. -360,050 to -550,910 -100 to -ISO 60 to 90 kWh per new household and 14,480 kWh per new nonresidential building 270 to 400 new households and 20 to 40 new nonresidential buildings CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • Ill APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: 3.2: Encourage the use of energy-efficient appliances and equipment in new buildings. The number of 2020 households was divided by the community 2020 residential kWh projection to find 2020 kWh per household. The number of 20 I 0 households was subtracted from the 2020 household estimate to identify the number of new household s that will be constructed, and therefore, subject to this policy. Average energy- efficient appliance reduction rates were applied to these figures to estimate reductions. 20 I 0 nonresidential community kWh (excluding street lighting) was s ubtracted from 2020 nonresidential c om munity kWh to identify the amount electricity to be used by new development. Using the commercial end-use study, this new kWh figure was broken into end- use kWh. Average energy-efficient appliance reduction rates were applied to estimate reductions. Brown, Ric h, Sam Bo rgeson, Jon Koomey, and Peter Biermayer. 2008. US Building-Sector Energy Efficiency Potential. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berke ley National Laboratory, University of California. http://enduse.lbl.gov/info/LBNL-I 096E.pdf. CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 20 I 0. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigat io n Measures. http://capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/20 I 0/1 1/CAPCOA- Quantification-Report-9-14-Final.pdf. ltron, Inc . 2007. California Commercial End-Use Survey-Results Page . http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. KEMA, Inc. 2009 Californi a Residential Appliance Saturation Study, Volume 2: Results . CEC-200-20 I 0-004. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applica ble Reduction Target: 3.3 : Participate in a regional effort to implement energy efficiency standards for new development. • Collaborate with the Energy Wise Partnership and the Los Ange les Cha pter of the US G reen Building Council to provide local t ra inin g and workshops fo r energy-efficient building opportunities. • Support development of a regional energy m anager position that could se rve as an advisor to p roject applicants interest e d in achieving energy efficiency. • Work with San Gabriel Valle y cities to identify t he most effective options to achieve energy efficiency in new development. Confirm the feasibility of adopting regionally cons istent, mandatory standards for new development to exceed mandatory Title 24 energy efficiency standards, such as adoption of Lo s Angeles County's green building code. Near-Term Community Development Achieve a I 0% reduction below basel ine nonresidential electricity use by 2020. 4.1: Streamline and encourage energy efficiency through the development standards and the permit and plan review process. • Consider fee adjustments and creation of administrative review and approval processes for energy efficiency projects. • Adopt the model energy efficiency code for use during the discretionary review process and use the voluntary energy efficiency guidelines as a tool during plan review of applications to encourage integration of cost-effective measures to improve the energy efficiency of projects. • Create residential and nonresidential energy efficiency packets with information on financing and resources, for distribution during pre- application meetings and at the planning and building counter. Near-Term Community Development Supports residential and nonresidential electricity targets CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: 4.2: Align planning efforts with energy efficiency and conservation. Implementation Actions: Implementation T ime Fram e: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Re ductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): Reduction Method: • Incorporate a nd expand policies from this EAP into future updates of the City's General Pl an. Long-Term Community Development Supports residential and nonres idential electricity targets 5.1: Expand the city's urban tree forest. • Highlight the monetary, health, energy-saving, and water-conserving benefits of maintaining, preserving. and e x panding the city 's urban tree forest. • Increase the number of trees planted and maintained on public rights-of-way through community volunteer efforts and street tree planting requirements for new developments . • Consider providing incentives for planting well placed shade trees to reduce household cooling electricity. Mid-Term Community Development and Parks and Recreation Supports residential and nonresidential electricity targets -46,690 to -312.690 -I 0 to -80 I 0 to SO kWh fo r homes and 360 to 1,620 kWh for nonresidential buildings 2,300 to 3,450 participating homes and 60 to 90 nonresidential buildings with added mature shade trees Shade trees can have a direct impact on decreasing the air conditioning load in buildings . This occurs when a tree's shade prevents the building from heating up throughout the day from the sunlight hitting windows and exterior walls. Using end-use surveys for both residential and commercial bl,lildings, the average air conditioner electricity use was calculated for both homes and businesses. This average was applied to the community-wide electricity use to estimate the total amount of electricity used in the city for air condition ing. A range of percentage reductions to cooling-related energy use per shade tree, taken from ICLE's CAPPA tool , was applied to a 2020 assumed tree planting goal to get a range of electricity reductions . CITY OF TEMPLE CIT Y APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Sources: Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department(s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance T arget(s) (2020): 5.1 : Expand the city's urban tree forest. ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability. 2012. Climate and Air Pollution Planning Assistant (CAPPA) Version 1.5 . ltron , Inc. 2007. California Commercial End-Use Survey -Results Page . http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx. KEMA , Inc . 2009 California Residential Appliance Saturation Study, Volume 2: Results . 2010. CEC-200-2010-004. US Census Bureau. 2006-20 I 0 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Table DP-4: Selected Housing Characteristics. 5.2: Maximize the use of cool roofs and surfaces to reduce electricity energy use. • Showcase the benefits and opportunities to install cool roofs and provide links to Cool California resources at community events and on the City's website. • Promote cost-effective opportunities to residents and business owners to install cool roofs, light-colored paved surfaces, and permeable pavement when not in conflict with community design guidelines. • Provide non-monetary support to energy-efficient ambassadors and community organizations to lead cool roof "work days" to repaint traditional roofs at schools or public facilities with cool paint materials. • When cost-effective, utilize cool-colored and permeable pavement in City construction projects. Mid-Term Community Development and Parks and Recreation Supports residential and nonresidential electricity targets -167,140 to -288,030 -40 to -80 90 kWh per household and 0 .2 kWh per square foot of nonresidential roof cooled I, ISO to 2,300 participating single-family housing units and 288,3 I 0 to 345,970 square feet in nonresidential buildings CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Ill APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Implementation Actions: Implementation Time Frame: Implementation Department( s): Applicable Re duction Target: kWh Reductions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): Reduction Method: Reduction Sources: 6.2: Encourage the use of energy-and water-efficient water fixtures for indoor water use. • Encourage local w ater providers to provide water cons e rvation kits and surveys to customers. • Promote and distribute SCE 's energy efficiency kit, which includes low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators. • Cons ider creating ultra-low-flow toilet and wash ing machine trade-in programs. Near-Term Community Development Supports reside ntial and nonresidential electricity targets -346,950 to -I , 156,500 -90 to -300 70 kWh 3,450 to 5,800 households participating Using the Aquacraft Inc. study conducted in Alameda and Contra Costa counties, the average gallons per capita of water used by typica l indoor appliances (e.g., faucets, showers, toilets, dishwashers) in a typical home and a home that has installed high efficiency w a ter devices were applied to find potential average gallon water savings in Temple City. This was applied to the per gallon kWh consumption, which is based on the City's water providers. Aquacraft, Inc . 2003 . Residential Indoor Water Conservation Study: Evaluation of High Efficiency Indoor Plumbing Fixture Retrofits in Single- Family Homes in the East Bay Municipal Utility District Service Area. Prepared for the East Bay Municipal District and US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www .ebmud.com/sites/ defaultlfiles/pdfs/res idential_indoor _we_ st udy_O.pdf. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY El APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Impl e mentation Actions: Impl ementation T ime Frame: Implementation Depar tment(s): Applicable Reduction Target: kWh Red uctions (2020): MTC02e Reductions (2020): Assumed Reduction per Participant: Performance Target(s) (2020): Reduction Method: 6.3: Encourage water-wise landscaping. • Use the model energy efficiency code to strengthen adopted xeriscaping policies. • Work with other San Gabriel Valley cities to consider adoption of mandatory water-efficient standards, such as CALGreen Tier I standards for water efficiency. • Encourage residents to install irrigation control sensors th r ough outreach, education, and incentives. • Consider a turf/grass removal incentive program. • Install educational information or demon stration gardens on C ity property to promote water conservation lan dscape practices. Mid-Term Community D evelopment Supports residential and nonresidential electricity targets -94,330 to -I 04,260 -20 to -30 2 .669.490 to 2 ,950,490 gallons saved I 0,940 to 12, I 00 residential water customers The actions in this policy support the 20% water reduction goal identified in the 20 I 0 California American Water. San Gabrie l County, Golden State Water, and East Pasadena Water Distr icts' urban water management plans . Since the UWMP already has actions outlined to achieve th e goal, and since the City is not a water provider. the kWh reductions as a result of achieving the goal were quantified . Baseline (a I 0-year average, identified in the UWMP) and 2020 gallons per capita per day were multiplied by EAP identified baseline and 2020 service population estimates, and converted to gallons per year. The difference between the two figures was identified to estimate the target gallons per year reduction. The UWMP 2020 projected water use by account type was utilized to estimate the amount of the target water reduction that would be removed from indoor and outdoor use, respectively. The estimated reduction in outdoor water use was multipl ied by the Temple City kWh per gallon coefficient, identified in the GHG Inventory and Forecast. Indoor water use wa s assumed to enter the wastewater system. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX C GHG METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS REPORT Policy: Reduction Sources: 6.3: Encourage water-wise landscaping. California Energy Commission. 2006. Refining Estimates of Water- Rel ated Energy Use in California. PIER Final Project Report. Prepared by Navigant Consulting. Inc. CEC-500-2006-1 18 . Golden State Water Company. 20 I I. 20 I 0 Urban Water Management Plan -South San Gabriel. Accessed November 28, 20 I I. San Gabriel County Water District. 20 I I . Urban Water Management Plan 20 I 0. Accessed November 28, 20 I I. Sunny Slope Water Company Water District. 20 I I. Urban Water Management Plan 20 I 0. Accessed November 28, 20 I I. Upper San Gabriel Valley Water District. 20 I I. Urban Water Management Plan 20 I 0. Accessed November 28, 20 I I. Water Systems Consulting. 20 I I . 20 I 0 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed November 28, 20 I I . C I TY OF TEMPLE CITY El APPENDIX D ELP REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST H . Adds statement/paragraph identifying all actions including (but not limited to) municipal retrofit projects and policies that will constitute meeting the "implementation " requirement in the ELP Platinum Level I. Includes language stating the EAP will be integrated in the next general plan update or other policy documents Platinum Level-Implement EAP A EAP approved by City Council with the plan's implementation time frame beginning within six months of approval B. Implementation actions must include the following : a . Evidence of inclusion (as a line item) of EAP implementation in City operating budget Example: Establi shment of energy revolving fund or reference to energy efficiency in the annual maintena nce budget demonstrating long-term implementation of EAP b. Ev idence of integration of EAP initiatives in City General Plan or other policy documents c. As referenced in Gold Level H. the completion of the identified actions that were delineated in the EAP d. Substantial evidence showing implementation of energy efficiency actions as identified in the EAP (such as invoices for municipa l projects) Please use the following table to help identify a reas of the EAP that satisfy the requirements. EAP Requirements for Gold Level A. Estab lishes long-term vision and plan for energy efficiency in the city B. Clearly states the aim and objectives of the plan C. Records the baseline municipal energy usage (kWh) D. Displays the highest users (facilities) that the City should target E. Identifies the city reduction goals and milestones F. Provides the plan of municipal facil ity projects that the City can complete to assist in achieving its reduction i. Identifies priority of projects ii. Identifies expected funding mechanisms to complete mun icipal facil ity energy efficiency projects Section and Page Number Where Found Chapter I , "Role of the EAP " section, page 7 Chapter I, "Role of the EAP " section, page 7 Chapter 3, "Municipal Electricity Demand" section, page 37 Chapter 3, "Municipal Electricity Demand" section, page 39 Chapter 4, "Reduction Targets" section, page 42 Chapter 4, "Municipal Energy Efficiency Projects and Policies " section, page 54-55 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPENDIX D ELP REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST EAP Requirements for Gold Level G. Identifies any policies or procedures the City can implement to assist in reducing energy H. Adds statement/paragraph identifying all actions including (but not limited to) municipal retrofit projects and policies that will constitute meeting the "Implementation" requirement in the ELP Platinum level I. Includes language stating the EAP will be integrated in the next General Plan update or other policy documents Section and Page Number Where Found Chapter 4, Policies I - 6, pages 42 -50, Policy 7, Pages 76-77 Chapter 5, "Monitoring and Updating the EAP" section, page 63-64 Chapter 4 , "Long-Term Mun icipal Policies" section , page 55 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY City of Temple City 9701 Las Tunas Dr. Temple City, California 91780 Steve Masura, Community Development Director Phone : (626) 285-2171 E-ma il: smasura@templecity.us Robert Sahagun, Public Safety and Services Manager Phone : (626) 285-2171 E-mail: rsa hagun@templecity .us Bryan Ariizumi, Public Safety Officer Phone : (626) 285-2171 E-mail : barilzumi@templecity.us Marilyn Bonus, Deputy City Clerk Phone : (626) 285-2171 E-mail: mbonus@templecity.us Teresa Santilena, Management Analyst Phone : (626) 285-2171 E-mail : tsantilena@templecity.us Willdan Energy Solutions 101 E. Huntington Or., Suite 110 Monrovia, California 91016 Program Management Team Rosie Kang, Program Manager Phone: (626) 305-6922 E-mail: rkang@w illdan .com Judy Silva, Program Analyst Phone : (626) 305-6921 E-m a il: jsilva@willdan .com Engineering Team Chris Kuch, P.E., Lead Engineer Phone : (626) 305-6991 E-mail: ckuch@willdan .com extending your rea ch Eng ineering and Pl anning I Energy Efficiency and Sustainabillty I Financial and Economic Consulting 1 National Preparedness and lnteroperability 626.256.05 26 I fax: 626.256.0525 I 10 1 East Huntingto n Drive. M onrovia. Cali fornia 9 10 16·3863 1 VNIW.wi lldan.co m Energy Efficiency Audits lor the Ci ty of Claremont Citv Hall• Polir.P. DPo<HimP.nl • .loslvn SP.n·or CP.n!P.r • A IP.ltnndP.r HliOhP.S Cnmm11mlv CP.ntP.r EEM-A: REPLACE OLDER ROOFTOP PACKAGED UNITS The exact age of the rooftop packaged units serving the community room is unknown . However, they are more than 13 years old. They were found to be in working condition and expected to exceed their estimated useful life of 10-15 years . Because the community room is not utilized as often as the rest of city hall , it is not cost-effective to replace the unit until the unit burns out. At that time , the unit should be replaced with high-efficiency models that exceed the current Title 24 code. EEM-8: REPAIR DUCTWORK FOR SERVER ROOM ROOFTOP UNIT Based on conversation with city personnel , the losses in the duct work do not allow enough conditioned air to the server room even though the unit is property sized. To remedy the situation , the door to the room was removed to allow more ve ntilation to the space. The current conf iguration appears to be satisfying the space. Consideration should be given to repairing the ductwork and adding a door to the server room upon replacement of the unit. This would allow the server room to maintain set point temperature , while running the rooftop unit less. EEM-C: INSTALL COOL ROOF The current roofing system is a buill-up roof with beige color gravel ballast and appeared to be good condition. However, additional energy savings can be achieved by replacing the roof with a cool roof system. Cool roofs have surfaces that reflect sunlight and emit heat more efficiently than hot or dark roofs , keeping them cooler in the sun . In contrast, hot roofs absorb much more solar energy than cool roofs, making them hotter. An analysis of a new cool roof system revealed that the energy cost savings do not justify the initial costs . The simple payback was calculated at 78 years . Therefore, we recommend that a cool roof system be installed when the existing roof is past its remain in g useful life and in need of replacment. Paoe 22 of 62 WwiLLDAN I i i J ' 5 ~TERNBEI\.G 18-737C LED Lighting Acorn Fixtures A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS LIST NO . A850SR LED OLD TOWN SERIES • On multiple head fixtures, photocells shall be mounted in the po le shaft, on an access plate. The photocell is not pre-wired since drivers are mounted in the fitters and packaged separately. • The photocell shall tum on at 1.0 foot-candle and tum otT at not more than 5 foot-candle s. • The photocell is 120V or 208-277 vo lt. Electronic Button Cell Option • Photocell s shall be e lectronic button type. • On single pos t-top fixtures, the photocell shall be mounted in the fitter and pre-wired to the driver. • On multiple head fixtures , photocells shall be mounted in the pole shaft, on an access plate . The photocell is not pre-wired since drivers are mounted in the fitters and packaged separate ly . • The photocell is instant-on at 1.5 foot-candles and turns off 5-I 0 seconds at 2-3 foot-candles . • The photocell is 120V or 208-277 volt. Roto-Lock Type Option • Photocells shall be roto-lock design, thennal-bimetaUic switch type. • 980 Fitter: Photocells sl1all be mounted in the fitter on the photocell bracket and pre-wired to the driv er. On multi-fixture poles the photocell shall be mounted on top of pole/ann/hangstraight. The photocell is not pre-wired on multi-fixture poles since drivers are mounted in the fitters and packaged separately. • Roto-Lock Roof option (SRR and SRRl}: On single-fixture poles, the photocell shall be mounted on top of roof, protected by a waterproof spiruung and gasket; and pre-wired to the driver. • Photocell time delay is 2 minutes to turn on at 1.5 foot-candles and 2 minutes to turn off at no more than 6 foot-candles. • The photocell is 120-277 volt. FINISH • Prior to coating, the luminaire shall be chemically cleaned and etched in a 5-stage washing system which includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse-osmosis water rinsing and non-chrome sealing to ensure conosion resistance and excellent adhesion for th e finish coat. • The finish coat shall be an electrostatically applied semi-gloss, super durable polyester powder coat, baked on at 400°F, to provide a durable, color retentive finish . • *The optional (Verde Green or Swedish Iron) finish shall be hand-bmshed using a 3-step process. * (OPTION ) WARRANTY • The luminaire shall be free from all defects in materials and workmanship for a period of seven (7) years from the date of manufacture. • The luminaire manufacturer shall warrant the LED boards/system, during the stated warranty period, against failure defined as more than three (3) simultaneous non-operating LEOs. • The driver shall be warrant ed for seven (7) years. ~TERNBEI\,G 555 Lawrence Ave. Roselle , IL 60172 • 847--588-3400 • Fax 847-588-3440 LIGHTING www. sternberglighting.com Email : info@sternberglighting .com a-12