HomeMy Public PortalAbout09-08-1983 BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY OF THE
CITY OF RICHMOND,. INDIANA, SEPTEMBER 8, 1983
1 The Board of PublicWorks and Safety of the City of Richmond, Indiana, .met
2 in regular session September 8, 1983 at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in the Municipal Building
3 in said City. Mr. Webb presided with Mr. Cordell present. Mr. Meredith was on
4 vacation. The following business was had, to-wit:
5
6 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983
7
III 8 Mr. Cordl moved to approve the minutes f September 1, 1983 as prepared, seconded
9 by Mr. Webel b -and on unanimous voice vote the motion was carried.
10
11 RECEIVE BIDS FOR ROOF ON STREET DEPARTMENT GARAGE
12
13 City Attorney Ed Anderson examined proof of publication and found it to be in order.
14
15 Mr. Cordell moved to accept and place on file the legal ad for the Street Depart-
16 ment garage roof, seconded by Mr. Webb and on unanimous voice vote the motion was
17 carried.
18
19 The following bids were received and recorded:
20
21 Schriber Sheet Metal and Roofing: $28,825
22
23 The following proposal to furnish labor and material was enclosed:
24
25 1) . Remove and replace valleys as marked on drawing.
26 2) . Replace valleys with a 1-ply red rosin sheathing, one (1):
27 No. 43 base sheet nailed, 2" insulation mopped in steep
28 asphalt and then install 4-ply glass felt with interply
-
29 moppings of hot asphalt and surfaced the same.
30 3) . Furnish fibercant and flashing system at all valley walls.
31 4) . Remove and replace two (2) areas marked on drawing with a
ill32 1-ply red rosin, one (1) No. 43 base sheet and then two (2)
33 , plies of glass felt with interply moppings of hot asphalt.
34 5) . Replace approximately eight (8) galvanized pitch pockets.
35 6) . Repair various places where nails have come up through the
36 felts with plastic and membrane.
37 7) . Remove and replace 500 feet of coping marked as C. Coping
38 to be 24 gauge paintgrip metal.
39
40 TOTAL COST: $28,825.00
41
42 As per specifications the following would be our prices per square
43 foot and lineal foot for removal .and replacement:
44 .
45 a) . 2 x 10 = $22.00 per lineal foot
46 b) . 2 x 8 = $21.00 per lineal foot
47 c) . 2 x 6 T&G =$1.50 per lineal foot
48 e) . 5/8" CDX = $1.30 per 'square foot
49 Our quotation is based on approximately 5,900 square feet, 700 feet
50 cant and flash.
•
51
52 1) . Approximately $3.50 per square foot for removal and replacement
53 of roof with red rosin, base sheet, 2" insulation and 4-ply glass.
54
55 - - 2) . Approximately $2. 10 per square foot for removal and replacement
56 of roof with red rosin, base sheet and two (2) plies of glass.
57
58 We wish to remind the Owners that we feel the whole roof should be done.
59
60 Gentry Industrial Service: -
61
62 A. Southeast Flat Area $2,700.00
63 B. No. 1 Sawtooth (South) $7,286.00
64 C. No. 2 Sawtooth (Middle) $6,791.00
65 D. No. 3 Sawtooth (North) $6,791.00
66 E. Southwest Flat Area - $2,700.00
67 F. Wash & Equipment Room (North
68 Center Deck) $8,122.00
Board of Works Minutes Cont'd.
September 8, 1983
Page 2
1 G. Wash & Equipment Room (East Slope) $6,671.00
2 H. Sweeper Room $2,280.00
3 I. Paint Room $1,595.00
4
5 Metal wall cap - South elevation, Southeast wall, and Southwest
6 walls. $4.40 per ft.
7 Deck replacement - wood deck using materials to match existing.
8 2" deck - $3.40 sq. ft.
9 1" deck - $2.30 sq. ft.
10 Cash allowance - deck replacement. $2,000,00
11
12 The non-Collusion affidavit was not signed or notarized.
13
14 Thomas Roofing Company, Inc. : $34,780.
15
16 Cost for replacing deck, purlins and nailers:
17 a. Purlins to be pressure treated dimension lumber matching
18 existing purlins in size: Cost per L.F. $1 .50
19 b. Nailers to be pressure treated dimension lumber matching
20 existing purlins in size. Cost per L.F. $1.60
21 c. Deck to be replaced as required, using either 5/8 CDX
22 plywood or pressure treated boards. Cost per S.F. $1 .65
23 e. Provide cost per S.F. to remove and replace roofing in
24 addition to base bid. Cost per S.F. $1.00
25
26 The base price is based upon reroofing 23,500 square feet. The quotation also includes
27 removal of existing metal coping and installing new white aluminum coping.
28
29 Mr. Webb recommended taking the bidsunder advisement for further review and
30 recommendation. Mr. Cordell moved to take the bids under advisement for further
31 study, seconded by Mr. Webb and on unanimous voice vote the motion was carried.
32
33 The meeting was recessed until 10:00 a.m. at which time two (2) nuisances
34 hearings will be held.
35
36 Mr. Webb turned the meeting over to City Attorney Ed Anderson for him to con-
37 duct the hearing. He noted these complaints are being brought under Municipal
38 Code 94.04.
39
40 NUISANCE HEARING FOR 418 N. W. 7th STREET
41
42 The first complaint was against Betty Winn, 418 N. W. 7th Street who was not.
43 present. The law permits the hearing can be conducted inher absence. The record
44 will show Betty Winn did receive a copy of the complaint by certified mail.. The
45 clerk read the complaint for one (1) inoperable vehicle on the premises. Com-
46 plaintant John Bronston described the nuisance as a Buick automobile which appears to
47 be in an inoperable condition. The Board had before them a picture of the
- 48 nuisance and Mr. Bronston presented another picture taken this morning showing
49 the nuisance still exists. Mr. Bronston checked at the auditor's office and de-
50 termined Betty Winn is the owner of record of this property. He was told the
51 vehicle hasn't been moved for three (3) or four (4). years. It has a '78 license
52 plate. Mr. Bronston sent a form letter to Ms. Winn on 6-2-82. Shortly after
53 that she called and said she had contacted someone and was going to have the
54 vehicle removed. Last week she was contacted and said it would be removed prior
55 to this meeting. Complaints have been received from the neighborhood concerning
56 this nuisance.
57
58 Mr. Anderson noted the Board must determine whether a nuisance does in- fact
59 exist, if the owner is maintaining the nuisance which is contrary to the -
60 ordinance and then take if under advisement or render a decision. Usually
61 thirty (30) days is given for removal and, if they fail to remove it, the
62 nuisance will be removed by the city and the cost put on the real estate taxes.
63
64 Mr. Anderson stated usually the decision reads like this: Comes now the Board
65 of Public Works and Safety of the City of Richmond and being duly advised in
66 the premises now finds that 1) a nuisance does in fact exist on the premises
67 known as 418 N. W. 7th Street 2) the defendant, Betty Winn, does own said
68 premises and -the nuisance being now maintained on said premises and 3) the
69 maintaining of such nuisance is contrary to Section 94.04 of the Municipal
70 Code of the City of Richmond; now, therefore, be it ordered that 1) defendant
•
Board of Works Minutes Cont'd.
September 8, 1983
Page 3
1 Betty Winn, owner of the .real and personal .property which is creating the
2 nuisance, remove and abate .said nuisance from:the aforesaid ,premises within
3 thirty (30) -days hereof and it is further ordered that,. if, the. defendant
4 • fails to comply with this order to.abate said .nuisance as set out...above,. ,the
5 Board of Public 'Works and. Safety •of the City, of Richmond. will-..caus.e.said. . .
6 nuisance to be-.removed_and. .the cost .thereof,assess.ed..against said._d.efendant
7 and said cost- to be placed. on the real estate tax duplicate for said premises.
8 - • . _ . .
9 Mr. Webb so moved, seconded by Mr. Cordell and on unanimous voice vote the
10 motion was carried.
11
12 NUISANCE HEARING FOR 1116 SOUTH 7TH STREET •
13 ._ .
14 This complaint is against-Margaret. Whitehead,. 111.6 South 7th Street, who was
15 not present. This hearing can be held in her. absence. The clerk read the._
16 complaint for, one ,(1) inoperable vehicle on the premises. The record ,will show
17 that Ms. Whitehead was sent a .notice of this hearing by certified mail and the
18 receipt was returned signed, -Mr.• Bronston noted the vehicle is a-:Ford .located
19 at the rear of the property. His office received a complaint about several
20 vehicles in the neighborhood. At that time four (4) persons were contacted
21 and form letters were sent to two (2), on July 15, one of whom was Ms. Whitehead.
22 On August 10 a complaint,was filed with the .Board of Works in regard to this
23 inoperable -vehicle. ' During this time, the vehicle has set in the same location.
24 It does not have all the tires and does not have a current license -plate..
25 Mr. Bronston presented a -picture taken this morning. He has checked the audi-
26 tor's office as to the ownership of this property and found it is Ms.. White-
27 head's, who resides there. In talking with her, Mr. Bronston stated she •
28 indicated it was her intention to have the- vehicle removed prior to this meeting.
29
30 Mr. Anderson recommended the same type motion. •
31
32 Mr. Webb moved that a nuisance does exist at 1116 South 7th Street and that
33 said nuisance must be removed within -thirty (30): days from this date or the
III 34 city will cause said vehicle to be .removed and- the cost of such action will
35 be assessed against the owner of the property and be collected in the same
36 manner that real estate taxes are collected, seconded by Mr. Cordell and on
37 unanimous -voice vote the motion was carried.
38 •
39 ADJOURNMENT
40
41 There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
42
43 - George Webb -
44 - Acting President
45
46 ATTEST: JoEllen Trimble
47 Clerk of the Board
I