HomeMy Public PortalAbout12062021 PDB MinutesCITY OF CRESTVIEW
Community Development Services
P.O. DRAWER 1209, CRESTVIEW, FLORIDA 32536
Phone # (850) 1560 Fax # (850) 682-8077
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Minutes
December 6, 2021
6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
1 Call to Order
2 Pledge of AIW-Dance
3 Approve Agenda
Motion by Ellis Conner and seconded by Mario Werth to approve the agenda.
Roll Call: Board member Ellis Conner, aye; Board member Michael Gilbert, aye; Board
member Michael Roy, aye; Board member Mario Werth, aye; and Board member Bryan
Follmar, aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
4 Public Oimortunifv to sneak on A+,enda items
5 Consent A4.!enda
Ellis Conner and seconded by Mario Werth to approve the Consent Agenda. All ayes.
Motion carried.
6 Ordinance on 1st readinal Public HearinL,
6.1 Ordinance 1849 Property Rights Element of the Comprehensive Plan
Planner N. Schwendt presented the Ordinance information to the Planning Board and
asked the City Clerk, Maryanne Schrader, to read the Ordinance by Title:
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR
FILING WITH THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT OF OKALOOSA COUNTY,
THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF OKALOOSA
COUNTY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SCRIVENER'S
ERRORS; PROVIDING FOR LIBERAL INTERPRETATION;
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING CODES AND ORDINANCES;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
This is the first reading and public hearing of Ordinance 1849.
Planner N. Schwendt went over the item: Pursuant to the requirements of 163.3177, this
amendment will add a Property Rights Element as Chapter 18 of our Comprehensive
Plan. The new element contains the rights that shall be considered in local decision
making, as required by, and spelled out in F.S. 163.3177(i).
The state Department of Economic Opportunity will not review any comprehensive
plan amendment packages (including future land use map amendments
accompanying annexations larger than 10 acres) without this element being included
in the comprehensive plan, or amendment package.
Motion by Board member Ellis Conner and seconded by Board member Mario Werth to
approve Ordinance 1849 for Public Hearing and forward to the City Council for 1 st
reading.
Roll Call: Board member Ellis Conner, aye; Board member Michael Gilbert, aye; Board
member Michael Roy, aye; Board member Mario Werth, aye; and Board member Bryan
Follmar, aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
7 Ordinances — None scheduled.
8 Final Plats and PUDS — None scheduled.
9 Action Items
9.1 Discussion of Manufactured Home Placement Provisions
Board member Bryan Follmar voiced concern on setbacks mentioning he was
hesitant about stacking mobile homes. Discussion ensued about concerns on
squeezing mobile homes in a tight location, the average of years that a mobile home
has before it loses its value, and the direction of the door facing the street.
Planner N. Schwendt mentioned that he could do a comparison of the value of other
homes in the area.
Board member Ellis Conner discussed the regulation of mobile home stickers and the
assessed value. Planner N. Schwendt said the property appraiser assesses the land and
building value separately and stated he could build that into the ordinance. Board
member Ellis Conner recommended bringing back a draft to the next meeting.
The consensus of the Board was for Planner N. Schwendt to bring back a draft
ordinance to the meeting in January.
10 Special Exceptions, Variances. Vacations and Aimeals - Board of Adiustment Public
Hearing
10. 10.1 Appeal of Administrative Decisions
Chair M. Roy recessed the Planning and Development Board and opened the Board
of Adjustments at 6:21 p.m.
Planner N. Schwendt said that since the Land Development Code was adopted, a
number of items needed to be changed. One provision requires specific access
distances from a commercial site to the right-of-way. There are also landscape buffer
requirements, which requires access drives to be setback from the property line. This
causes hardship for local developers in particular small developers and the downtown
area and were found to be unnecessary, as it is addressed in other sections of the
code. We have several projects coming forward that will be affected by the Code.
Staff has to deny each applicant because it is not in compliance with our current code.
The limitations could cause no development in the affected locations. He asked the
Planning Development Board to reverse the decisions.
City Attorney J. Holloway explained when the Land Development Code was
rewritten, there is incongruity to two sections of the Code, so the director must follow
the requirements as written in the Code. He said the Planning and Development
Board has an option to overturn the decision of the Planning Director to speed up the
process. The new ordinance will include a table to improve the process.
The consensus of the Board was to have staff bring back a draft, as the current Code
needs to be rewritten.
Planner N. Schwendt said we will bring back revisions in six months, and then will
review the ordinance on an annual basis.
Motion 1
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning and Development Board, sitting as the
Board of Adjustment, make a motion to reverse the portion of the administrative
decision caused by Section 8.04.00(A)(6) of the Land Development Code resulting in
the denial of the Garden Street Strip Mall project located at 599 Garden Street, Parcel
ID# 04-3N-23-1840-0002-OOIA.
Chair M. Roy asked for public comment.
Motion by Board member Mario Werth and seconded by Bryan Follmar to reverse
the portion of the administrative decision caused by Section 8.04.00(A)(6) of the
Land Development Code resulting in the denial of the Garden Street Strip Mall
project located at 599 Garden Street, Parcel ID# 04-3N-23-1840-0002-OOIA.
Roll Call: Board member Ellis Conner, aye; Board member Michael Gilbert, aye;
Board member Michael Roy, aye; Board member Mario Werth, aye; and Board
member Bryan Follmar, aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion 2
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning and Development Board, sitting as the
Board of Adjustment, make a motion to reverse the portion of the administrative
decision caused by Section 8.04.00(A)(6) of the Land Development Code resulting in
the denial of the Woodlawn Church Parking Lot project located at 124 Woodlawn Dr,
Parcel ID# 08-3N-23-1380-0002-0050.
Chair M. Roy asked for public comment.
Motion by Board member Bryan Follmar and seconded by Board member Mario
Werth to reverse the portion of the administrative decision caused by Section
8.04.00(A)(6) of the Land Development Code resulting in the denial of the
Woodlawn Church Parking Lot project located at 124 Woodlawn Dr, Parcel ID# 08-
3N-23-13 80-0002-0050.
Roll Call: Board member Ellis Conner, aye; Board member Michael Gilbert, aye;
Board member Michael Roy, aye; Board member Mario Werth, aye; and Board
member Bryan Follmar, aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion 3
Chair M. Roy asked for public comment.
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning and Development Board, sitting as the
Board of Adjustment, make a motion to reverse the portion of the administrative
decision caused by Sections 8.04.00(A)(4)(b) of the Land Development Code
resulting in the denial of the Beautiful Creations project located at 830 N Brett St,
Parcel ID# 17-3N-23-2490-0036-0070.
Motion by Board member Bryan Follmar and seconded by Board member Mario
Werth to reverse the portion of the administrative decision caused by Sections
8.04.00(A)(4)(b) of the Land Development Code resulting in the denial of the
Beautiful Creations project located at 830 N Brett St, Parcel ID# 17-3N-23-2490-
0036-0070.
Roll Call: Board member Ellis Conner, aye; Board member Michael Gilbert, aye;
Board member Michael Roy, aye; Board member Mario Werth, aye; and Board
member Bryan Follmar, aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
Motion 4
Chair M. Roy asked for public comment.
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning and Development Board, sitting as the
Board of Adjustment, make a motion to reverse the portion of the administrative
decision caused by Sections 8.04.00(A)(4)(b) and (6) of the Land Development Code
resulting in the denial of the DAW Complex project located at 2803 Goodwin Ave,
Parcel ID# 20-3N-23-0000-0126-0050.
Motion by Board member Bryan Follmar and seconded by Board member Mario
Werth to reverse the portion of the administrative decision caused by Sections
8.04.00(A)(4)(b) and (6) of the Land Development Code resulting in the denial of the
DAW Complex project located at 2803 Goodwin Ave, Parcel ID# 20-3N-23-0000-
0126-0050.
Roll Call: Board member Ellis Conner, aye; Board member Michael Gilbert, aye;
Board member Michael Roy, aye; Board member Mario Werth, aye; and Board
member Bryan Follmar, aye. All ayes. Motion carried.
11 Comments from the Audience
Chair M. Roy reopened the meeting and asked if anyone had any comments. He mentioned
there were no applications received for the vacancy, so the application process has been
reopened until December 22nd.
12 Adiournment
Chair M. Roy adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
Approved: /�Y� �t*1••••••••..
Michael Roy, Chair 4 0043rV j� •,,
p �ow►rF �'
Attest: = � 0 %
d
.v a
S�°
s %,
Minute sub itte y Maryanne Schrader •; rw�
City Clerk •, -'tee
Proper notice having been duly given ••���„•.• �`,