HomeMy Public PortalAbout22-073 - Execute loan application for the FDEP SRL for Drinking waterSponsored By: Interim City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 22-073
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-
LOCKA, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE A LOAN APPLICATION TO THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE
REVOLVING FUND FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S
DRINKING WATER FACILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION
OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Opa-Locka ("City") water utility system provides service
to portions of neighboring communities, including southern portions of the City of Miami
Gardens; and
WHEREAS, the City's water distribution system is old and is subject to periodic
pipe failure, requiring excavation to effect repairs, including disrupting roadways; and
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Gardens is planning a major roadway
improvement program, which, when completed, will require the City of Opa-Locka to be
charged significantly more each time it becomes necessary to disrupt a roadway for a
utility line repair; and
WHEREAS, consequently, the City is proposing a complete renovation of the
water distribution system in this area to significantly lessen the probability of having to
disrupt the City of Miami Gardens upgraded roadway for the foreseeable future; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that this project will cost approximately $2.0 million.
Approval is recommended to authorize the City Manager to submit a loan application
for said amount and be the designated and authorized representative to establish pledged
revenues, and provide the assurances and commitments required by the State Revolving
Fund Application; and
WHEREAS, this project will enable the City of Opa-Locka to upgrade and replace
the drinking water infrastructure of the section designated as Miami Gardens Phase 1 to
continue to ensure the provision of safe drinking water while significantly reducing
maintenance costs due to an upgraded and more reliable water distribution system; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it in the best interests of the City to
authorize the Interim City Manager as the designated and authorized representative to
establish pledged revenues and provide the assurances and commitments required by
the State Revolving Fund Drinking Water Loan agreement for the Miami Gardens Phase
1 water facilities improvement project.
Resolution No. 22-073
J
nna Flores, City Clerk
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF OPA- LOCKA, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference.
SECTION 2. AUTHORIZATION
The City Commission hereby authorizes the Interim City Manager to execute a
loan application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection State Revolving
Fund for improvements to the City of Opa-Locka Drinking Water Facility.
SECTION 3. SCRIVENER'S ERRORS
Sections of this Resolution may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of
typographical errors, which do not affect the intent of this Resolution may be authorized
by the City Manager, following review by the City Attorney, without need of public
hearing, by filing a corrected copy of same with the City Clerk.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall take effect upon the adoption and is subject to the approval of the
Governor or Governor's Designee.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 14U1 day of December, 20
John :-Taylof r., Mayor
TEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
�
l l�c?.,c� rc,<
Burnadette Norri Weeks, P.A.
City Attorney
2
Resolution No. 22-073
Moved by: Commissioner Bass
Seconded by: Commissioner Williams
VOTE: 5-0
Commissioner Bass YES
Commissioner Kelley YES
Commissioner Williams YES
Vice Mayor Ervin YES
Mayor Taylor YES
3
City of Opa-locka
Agenda Cover Memo
Department
Manager:
City
Manager:
Commission
Meeting
Date:
Fiscal
Impact:
(Enter Xin box)
Funding
Source:
Account# :
Contract/P.O.
Required:
(Enter Xin box)
Strategic
Plan Related
(Enter Xin box)
Sponsor
Name
Adelina Gross
Darvin Williams
12/14/2022
Yes
X
No
(Enter Fund & Dept.)
Ex:
Yes
X
Yes
X
City Manager
No
No
Item Type:
(Enter Xin box)
Ordinance Reading:
(Enter Xin box)
Public Hearing:
(Enter Xin box)
Department
Director
Signature:
CM Signature:
Resolution
Advertising Requirement:
(Enter Xin box)
RFP/RFQ/Bid#:
Strategic Plan Priority Area:
Enhance Organizational I]
Bus. & Economic Dev
Public Safety
Quality of Education
Qual. of Life & City Image .
Communication 0
Department: CIP/PW
X
Ordinance
Pt Reading
Yes
Yes
No
X
Other
2nd Reading
Yes
x
No
No
X
Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy:
Improve the quality of Drinking
Water and protect public health
City Manager
Short Title:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA FLORIDA AUTHORIZING A LOAN APPLICATION
TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE REVOLVING FUND FOR IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA DRINKING WATER FACILITY
Staff Summary:
The City's water utility system provides service to portions of neighboring communities, including southern portions
of the City of Miami Gardens. The City's water distribution system is old and is subject to periodic pipe failure,
requiring excavation to effect repairs, including disrupting roadways. The City of Miam Gardens is planning for a
major roadway improvement program, which, when completed, will require the City of Opa-locka to be charged
significantly more each time it becomes necessary to disrupt a roadway for a utility line repair. Consequently, the
City is proposing a complete renovation of the water distribution system in this area to significantly lessen the
probability of having to disrupt the City of Miam Gardens upgraded roadway for the foreseeable future.
It is anticipated that this project will cost approximately $2.0 million. Approval is recommended to authorize the
City Manager to submit a loan application for this amount and be the designated and authorized representative to
establish pledged revenues, and provide the assurances and commitments required by the State Revolving Fund
Application.
This project will enable the City of Opa-locka to upgrade and replace the drinking water infrastructure of the section
designated as Miami Gardens Phase 1 to continue to ensure the provision of safe drinking water while significantly
reducing maintenance costs due to an upgraded and more reliable water distribution system.
Financial Impact: SRF loans are typically 20 -year loans with current annual interest rates in the range of 2%. If the
City is successful in obtaining this loan, debt service (principal and interest payments) will be slightly over $100,000
per year. If the City is awarded this loan, it will be brought forward for Commission approval, at which time the debt
service and the manner in which it will be funded will be clearly defined.
Proposed Action:
Staff recommends the City Commission authorize the City Manager as the designated and authorized representative
to establish pledged revenues and provide the assurances and commitments required by the State Revolving Fund
Drinking Water Loan agreement for the Miami Gardens Phase 1 water facilities improvement project.
Attachment:
1. Agenda
2. Project Description
giorickt
Water Distribution System Improvements Miami Gardens Phase 1
1. Scope and Water Mains, Valves, Fire Hydrants replacement/upgrade
and/or repair
The City of Opa-Locka provides water and sewer utility services for a portion of
the City of Miami Gardens' jurisdictional area. The existing Asbestos Cement Pipe
(ACP) water mains within the subject location requires replacement sent. As such,
the City of Opa-Locka is proposing to implement the Miami Gardens Water Main
improvements project to serve the existing commercial and residential properties.
The project area is bounded south by NW 151St Street, to the west by NW 37 Ave.,
to the east by NW 32nd Ave, and to the north by Biscayne Canal.
The western area is industrial area which is served by existing 12" PVC Water
Mains. The eastern area is
A residential neighborhood and served by existing 6" ACP and 2" ACP water
mains. The existing 2" ACP
water mains are located along the existing rear lot utility easements. The proposed
project scope includes
the relocation of water service and water meter locations from rear lot easements to
front road right-of-way
The project scope of work includes the construction of:
1. 5,565 LF of 8" PVC (C-900) water main
2. 1,027 LF of 8" HDPE water main
3. 212 LF of 8" DIP water main
4. 151 LF of 6" DIP water main
5. 8 Fire Hydrants
6. 116 single-family residential service connection
7. Replacement of commercial single/double/multi water services
1 Water Distribution System Improvements Miami Gardens Phase 1
T4-IE GREAT CITY
,e(y ryf'
a Qa- aK G3A
giorida
8. Relocation of water services from rear lot easements to the front road right-of-
way
9. Abandonment of existing ACP pipe and
10. Pavement restoration
The distribution system for Miami Gardens is more than 40 years old, the city is in
need of replacing existing asbestos cement pipes and lining/repairing, and/or
upgrading, existing water mains. Based on the assessment report the city needs to
replace the faulty and very old water distribution system within the highlighted
section.
MIAMI GARDENS WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
Miami Gardens
Opa-locka
PROJECT LOCATION
Legend
Transmission
Asbestos -Cement -ACP
Polyvinyl Chlorine - PVC
LDucti4e Iron - DIP
Distribution
Galvanized
Water Distribution System Improvements Miami Gardens Phase 1
THE GREAT CITY '
giorida
Project Layout
OPA-LOCKA - MIAMI GARDENS
WATER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Lat: 25.914563'
Long: -80.258266'
[Lae 25,9111.83°
'Long: 80.2580.38° j
I �
11
1 t_
.. ' l
3
IPROJECT LOCATION
Cost:
Lat: 25.911450'
Long: -80.251922'
Lat: 25.914819"
Long; -80.252219"
Miami Gardens
Opa-Iocka
Legend
Transmission
�^-^- Asbestos -Cement - ACP (41,213.91)
Polyvinyl Chlorine - PVC (5,86Bfs.
Ductile Iron - DIP (2,11391)
Distribution
Galvanized (4,358ft)
IProject Limits
City of OpB-Iocka'Mater System
The project construction cost is approximately One Million Eight Hundred Ninety -
Two Thousand Five Hundred Six Dollars ($1,892,506.00).
1 Water Distribution System Improvements Miami Gardens Phase 1
City of Opa-locka
Agenda Cover Memo
p
Depa tment er:
Man
Adelina Gross
Department
Director
Signature:
City
Manager:
Darvin Williams
CM Signature:
g ature:
Commission
Meeting
12/14/2022
Item Type:
Resolution
Ordinance
Other
Date:
(Enter Xin box)
%
Fiscal
Impact:
Yes
Ordinance Reading:
lst Reading
2" Reading
(EnterXin box)
No
(Enter X in box)
X
Public Hearing:
Yes
No
Yes
No
(Enter X in box)
X
X
Funding
(Enter Fund & Dept)
Ex:
Advertising Requirement:
Yes
No
Source:
Account# :
(EnterXinbox)
x
Contract/P.O.
Yes
No
RFP/RFQ/Bid#:
Required:
(Enter X in box)
X
Strategic
Yes
No
Strategic Plan Priority Area:
Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy:
Plan Related
(Enter Xin box)
X
Enhance Organizational El
Bus. & Economic Dev 0
Public Safety ®
Quality of Education El
Qual. of Life & City Image I®
Communication 0
Improve the quality of Drinking
Water and protect public health
Sponsor
Name
City Manager
Department: CIP/PW
City Manager
Short Title:
A Resolution to issue an RFP to select a qualified contractor(s) for replacement of the Sesame Street Culvert
Staff Summary:
A resolution of the City Commission of the City of Opa-locka authorizing the City Manager to issue an RFP for
construction services for the Replacement of the Culvert located along Sesame Street, on the Opa-locka Canal. This
project is required to restore traffic to its normal conditions along Sesame Street.
The City has identified the replacement of this culvert as a high priority project, as its current condition is causing
disruptions to traffic. Sesame Street is currently closed between the intersection with Atlantic Avenue and 135th
Street. As identified by an engineering firm evaluation, the culvert had failed wing walls, loss of backfill material and
failed top slab. These conditions require the complete replacement of the culvert structure with a new permanent
installation that will provide a prolonged useful life.
Sesame Street Culvert Replacement: The work generally consists of but is not necessarily limited to the following:
the installing of Contractor furnished materials and equipment necessary for the complete replacement of a culvert
along Sesame Street between NW 135th Street and Atlantic Avenue. Replacement includes 66 -inch Aluminized Steel
piping with new curb and gutters, sidewalks, guardrails, and pavement resurfacing with all appurtenant for
miscellaneous items and work for a completed project.
Financial Impact: The only financial impact at this time will be expenditure of up to $3,000 for advertising this RFP
to ensure the broadest number of potential bidders are made aware of this opportunity. The adopted FY 23 Budget
includes $800,000 for the project's construction.
Proposed Action:
Staff recommends the City Commission approve the RFP issuance for replacement of the culvert along Sesame
Street to remedy safety issues and restore normal traffic patterns on Sesame Street.
Attachment:
1. Agenda
2. RFP for Replacement of the Culvert along Sesame Street
300 Engineering Group, LLC
CONTRACT NO. 20-0324200 - TASK 3
CULVERT REPLACEMENT ALONG SESAME STREET
BETWEEN NW 135TH STREET AND ATLANTIC AVENUE
Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost
PROJECT PLANS COMPLETION PERCENTATGE:
�ZJ
A - CONSRUCTION ITEMS
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT COST/UNIT QUANTITY TOTAL COST COMMENTS
CM
1
FURNISH AND INSTALL INLET PROTECTION SYSTEM
EA
$90.00
2
$180.00
2
FURNISH AND INSTALL FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER
LF
$25.00
150
$3,750.00
3
FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY GUARDRAIL
LF
$120.00
120
$14,400.00
4
FOR SELECTIVE DEMOLITION
LS
$75,000.00
1
$75,000.00
5
FURNISH AND INSTALL CANAL BYPASS PUMPING
day
$2,500.00
45.000
$112,500.00
6
FOR REWORK LIMEROCK BASE, 4'
SY
$15.00
35
$525.00
7
FOR MILLING EX. ASPHALT PAVEMENT, 1"AVG DEPTH
SY
$5.00
1025
$5,125.00
8
FURNISH AND INSTALL SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, SP -9.5, PG-
TN
$200.00
56
$11,200.00
9
FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 4" THICK
SY
$100.00
1
$100.00
10
FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT, 10" THICK
SY
$350.00
167
$58,450.00
11
FURNISH AND INSTALL PIPE CULVERT ROUND, 66" DIAMETER
LF
$500.00
200
$100,000.00
12
FURNISH AND INSTALL CAST IN PLACE MITERED END SECTIONS
CY
$200.00
40
$8,000.00
13
FURNISH AND INSTALL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F
LF
$35.00
345
$12,075.00
14
FURNISH AND INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNINGS
SF
$50.00
1
$50.00
15
FURNISH AND INSTALL RIPRAP-RUBBLE STONE
TN
$95.00
165
$15,675.00
16
FURNISH AND INSTALL GUARDRAIL -ROADWAY
LF
$40.00
270
$10,800.00
17
FURNISH AND INSTALL THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID,
LF
$7.00
72
$504.00
18
FURNISH AND INSTALL THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID, 6"
GM
$6,200.00
0.013
$80.60
19
FURNISH AND INSTALL THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, YELLOW, SOLID,
GM
$6,600.00
0.038
$250.80
20
FURNISH AND INSTALL RETRO-REFLECTIVE/RAISED PAVEMENT
EA
$80.00
8
$640.00
21
FURNISH AND INSTALL PERFORMANCE TURF
SY
$20.00
40
$800.00
SUBTOTAL A - CONSTRUCTION COSTS:
$430,105.40
824,946.11
$18,494.53
-
$43,440.65
8473,546.05
Included in MOT
-- -- -- - ---
=IIY1:14a9134 KkSt r ,a. _
C - CONTINGENCY
FOR
FOR UNFORSEEN
ADJUSTMENTS
SUBTOTAL):
MOT AND TRAFFIC CONTROL (PERCENTAGE OF A) : 5.8 %
MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION (PERCENTAGE OF A) : 4.3%
OFF -DUTY POLICE OFFICER -
SUBTOTAL B - OTHER DIRECT COSTS:
CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL (A + B):
,3111111 1111111111L
CONDITIONS, MINOR CONSTRUCTION CHANGES, AND QUANTITY
AS ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER (PERCENTAGE OF CONSTRUCTION 20.0%
_
894,709.21
DEDICATED ALLOWANCE: JET EXISTING STORM PIPES SOUTH OF CULVERT LF $20.00 200 $4,000.00
DEDICATED ALLOWANCE: DESILT TWO (2) DRAINAGE STRUCTURES EA $500.00 2 81,000.00
DEDICATED ALLOWANCE: SHEETING & SHORING SF $20.00 2,100 $42,000.00
DEDICATED ALLOWANCE: REMOVAL & TRANSPORT OF UNSUITABLE BACKFILL CY $50.00 465 $23,250.00
DEDICATED ALLOWANCE: PERMITS, BONDS, INSURANCE, MAINTENANCE BOND 5.0% 823,677.30
TOTAL VALUE OF ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST (A + B + C): $662,182.56
City of Opa-Iocka
Agenda Cover Memo
Department
Manager:
Adelina Gross
Department
Director
Signature:
City
Manager:
Darvin Williams
CM Signature:
``
Commission
Meeting
Date:
12/14/2022
Item Type:
(EnterXin box)
Resolution
Ordinance
Other
R
Fiscal
Impact:
(EnterXin box)
Yes
No
Ordinance Reading:
(EnterXin box)
1st Reading
2nd Reading
X
Public Hearing:
(EnterXin box)
Yes _
No
Yes
No
X
X
Funding
Source:
Account# :
(Enter Fund & Dept)
Ex:
Advertising Requirement:
(EnterXin box)
Yes
No
X
Contract/P.O.
Required:
(EnterXin box)
Yes
No
RFP/RFQ/Bid#:
X
Strategic
Plan Related
(EnterXin box)
Yes
No
Strategic Plan Priority Area:
Enhance Organizational El
Bus. & Economic Dev El
Public Safety -
Quality of Education 0
Qual. of Life & City Image •
Communication CD
Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy:
Improve the quality of Drinking
Water and protect public health
X
Sponsor
Name
City Manager
Department: CIP/PW
City Manager
Short Title:
A Resolution to issue an RFP to select a qualified contractor(s) for the rehabilitation of the Historic City Hall
Staff Summary:
MC Harry and Associates, Inc. was selected by the City Commission to provide professional Architectural and
Engineering services for rehabilitation of the Historic City Hall Building. Phases I and II of the scope to assess existing
conditions, including preparation of base drawings and identification of improvement requirements have been
successfully completed. The final phase of the MC Harry and Associates contract will include final construction
document preparation for the renovation and repair to prevent further building degradation and restoration of the
Administrative Building, including exterior envelope, interior finishes, and improvement or replacement of the
primary mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection systems.
The RFP will be issued to select qualified contractor(s) for the rehabilitation of the Historic City Hall Building as per
construction documents and specifications.
Financial Impact: The only financial impact at this time will be expenditure of up to $3,000 for advertising this RFP
to ensure the broadest number of potential bidders are made aware of this opportunity. The adopted FY 23 Budget
includes $600,000 (a County General Obligation program grant) for the project's construction. It is anticipated that
the construction phase may cost up to $1.2 million, necessitating a budget amendment for the remainder of the
funding. A budget amendment will be included at the time this project is brought forward for Commission approval
to begin construction.
Proposed Action:
Staff recommends the City Commission approve the RFP issuance to obtain the most responsive and responsible
contractor to rehabilitate the Historic City Hall Building.
Attachment:
1. Agenda
2. RFP for Rehabilitation of Historic City Hall
3. Architectural Plans
City of Opa-locka
RFP N0: 2 2-)00XXXX
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
RFP NO. 22-XXXXXXX
REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subject Page Number
Cover 1
Table of Contents
2
Advertisement
3
Part I - Proposal Guidelines 4
Part II - Nature of Services Required 8
Part III - Proposal Requirements 10
Part IV - Evaluation of Proposals 12
Proposer Qualifications 14
Price Proposal 15
Debarment, Suspension Certification 16
Drug -Free Certification 18
Non -Collusion Affidavit 19
Non -Discrimination Affidavit 20
E -Verify Form
21
2IPage
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RFP NO: 22-XXXXXXX
REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL
Sealed Proposals for the Rehabilitation of Historic City Hall will be received by the City of Opa-locka at the Office of the
City Clerk, 780 Fisherman St, 4th Floor, Opa-locka, Florida 33054, Wednesday, January 4, 2023 by 2:00 p.m. Any
RFP Package received after the designated closing time will be returned unopened. The City of Opa-locka will be
accepting proposals by mail, however it is your responsibility to submit your proposal by the due date. In addition,
proposals may be submitted via www.demandstar.com (e -bid). The address to submit sealed proposals is listed below:
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
Office of the City Clerk
780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor
Opa-locka, Florida 33054
An original and six (6) copies for a total of seven (7) plus 1 copy of the Proposal package on USB Flash Drive in PDF
format shall be submitted in sealed envelopes/packages addressed to the City Clerk, City of Opa-locka, Florida, and
marked RFP for Rehabilitation of Historic City Hall.
Proposers desiring information for use in preparing proposals may obtain a set of such documents by visiting the
City's website at www.opalockafl.gov or www.demandstar.com.
The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals and to waive any technicalities or irregularities
therein. The City further reserves the right to award a contract to that proposer whose proposal best complies with
the RFP NO: 22-XXXJ(XXX requirements. Proposers may not withdraw their proposal for a period of ninety (90)
days from the date set for the opening thereof.
A pre -bid meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. at 780 Fisherman Street, Ste. 220,
Opa-locka, FL 33054 and via zoom.
To participate via Zoom, please use the call -in information listed below:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/4638013145?pwd=UGFpTmFpbE52c2d0ZnBTenB4Z21HZz09
Meeting ID: 463 801 3145
Passcode: 780334
One tap mobile
+13126266799,4638013145#,*780334# US (Chicago)
+16465588656,4638013145#,*780334# US (New York)
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/k1HRpbFTd
Joanna Flores, CMC
City Clerk
RFP NO.22-XXXXXXX
REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL
PART I
PROPOSAL GUIDELINES
Introduction: The City of Opa-locka is requesting proposals from qualified
professional companies to provide and serve as project architect/ engineer/ general
contractor associated with the design, renovation, and installation for Rehabilitation of
Historic City Hall.
1-2. Proposal Submission and Withdrawal: The City of Opa-locka will be
accepting proposals by mail, however it is your responsibility to submit your proposal
by the due date. In addition, proposals may be submitted via www.demandstar.com (e -
bid). The City must receive all proposals by 2:00 pm on Wednesday. January 4. 2023.
The address to submit sealed proposals is listed below:
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
Office of the City Clerk
780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor
Opa-locka, Florida 33054
To facilitate processing, please clearly mark the outside of the proposal package as
follows: RFP NO. 22-XXXXXXX -REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL. This
package shall also include the Proposer's return address.
Proposers may withdraw their proposals by notifying the City in writing at any time
prior to the deadline for proposal submittal. After the deadline, the proposal will
constitute an irrevocable offer, for a period of 90 days. Once opened, proposals become
a record of the CITY and will not be returned to the Proposer.
The City cautions proposers to assure actual delivery of mailed or hand -delivered
proposals directly to the City Clerk's Office at 780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor, Opa-
locka, Florida 33054 prior to the deadline set for receiving proposals. Telephone
confirmation of timely receipt of the proposal may be made by calling (305) 688-4611
before proposal closing time. Any proposal received after the established deadline will
not be considered and will be returned unopened to the Proposer(s).
1-3. Number of Copies: Proposers shall submit an original and six (6) copies (a
total of 7) plus one copy on CD in PDF format of the proposal in a sealed, opaque
package marked as noted above. The Proposer will be responsible for timely delivery,
whether by personal delivery, US Mail or any other delivery medium.
1-4. Development Costs: Neither the City nor its representatives shall be liable for
any expenses incurred in connection with preparation of a response to this Request for
4 I i'
Proposal. Proposers should prepare their proposals simply and economically,
providing a straightforward and concise description of the Proposer's ability to meet
the requirements of the RFP.
1-5. Inquiries: The City Clerk will receive written requests for clarification
concerning the meaning or interpretations of the RFP, until eight (8) days prior to the
submittal date. City personnel are authorized only to direct the attention of prospective
Proposers to various portions of the RFP so that they may read and interpret such for
themselves. No employee of the City is authorized to interpret any portion of this RFP
or give information as to the requirements of the RFP in addition to what is contained
in the written RFP document.
1-6. Addendum: The City may record its response to inquiries and any
supplemental instructions in the form of written addenda. The CITY may mail written
addenda up to three (3) calendar days before the date fixed for receiving the proposals.
Proposers shall contact the City to ascertain whether any addenda have been issued.
Failure to do so could result in an unresponsive proposal. Any oral explanation given
before the RFP opening will not be binding.
All Proposers are expected to carefully examine the proposal documents. Any
ambiguities or inconsistencies should be brought to the attention of the City's
Purchasing Agent through written communication prior to the opening of the
proposals.
1-7. Contract Awards: The City anticipates entering into an Agreement with the
Proposer who submits the proposal judged by the City to be most advantageous.
The Proposer understands that this RFP does not constitute an offer or an Agreement
with the Proposer. An offer or Agreement shall not be deemed to exist and is not
binding until proposals are reviewed, accepted by appointed staff.
The City reserves the right to reject all proposals, to abandon the project and/or to
solicit and re -advertise for other proposals.
1-8. Contractual Agreement: This RFP and Consultant/Contractor proposal shall
be included and incorporated in the final award. The order of contractual precedence
will be the Contract or Agreement document, original Terms and Conditions, and
Proposer response. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the award will be held
in Miami -Dade County and the contractual obligations will be interpreted according to
the laws of Florida. Any additional contract or agreement requested for
consideration by the Proposer must be attached and enclosed as part of the
proposal.
1-9. Selection Process: The proposals will be evaluated and assigned points. The
firm with the highest number of points will be ranked first; however, nothing herein
will prevent the City from assigning work to any firm deemed responsive and
responsible.
51Page
The City reserves the right to further negotiate any proposal, including price, with the
highest rated Proposer. If an agreement cannot be reached with the highest rated
Proposer, the City reserves the right to negotiate and recommend award to the next
highest Proposer or subsequent Proposers until an agreement is reached.
1-10. Public Records: Upon award recommendation or ten (10) days after opening,
whichever occurs first, proposals become "public records" and shall be subject to
public disclosure consistent with Chapter 119 Florida Statutes. Proposers must invoke
the exemptions to disclosure provided by law in the response to the RFP and must
identify the data or other materials to be protected and must state the reasons why
such exclusion from public disclosure is necessary. Document files may be examined,
during normal working hours.
1-11. News Releases: The Proposer shall obtain the prior approval of the City
Manager's Office of all news releases or other publicity pertaining to this RFP or the
service, study or project to which it relates.
1-12. Insurance: The awarded Proposer(s) shall maintain insurance coverage
reflecting at least the minimum amounts and conditions specified herein. In the event
the Proposer is a governmental entity or a self -insured organization, different
insurance requirements may apply. Misrepresentation of any material fact, whether
intentional or not, regarding the Proposers' insurance coverage, policies or capabilities
maybe grounds for rejection of the proposal and rescission of any ensuing Agreement.
1. Evidence of General Liability coverage with limits not less than $1,000,000
per Occurrence/ $2,000,000 Aggregate (Including Policy Number and
Policy Period);
2. Evidence of Auto Liability coverage with limits not less than $1,000,000 per
Occurrence/$1,000,000 Aggregate (Including Policy Number and Policy
Period);
3. Evidence of Workers' Compensation coverage with statutory limits and
Employer's Liability coverage with limits not less than $100,000 (Including
Policy Number and Policy Period);
4.The City listed as an additional insured (this may be specifically limited to
the specific job(s) the contractor will be performing);
5. Minimum 30 -day written notice of cancellation.
1-13. Licenses: Proposers, both corporate and individual, must be fully licensed and
certified in the State of Florida at the time of RFP submittal. The proposal of any
Proposer who is not fully licensed and certified shall be rejected.
1-14. Public Entity Crimes: Award will not be made to any person or affiliate
identified on the Department of Management Services' "Convicted Vendor List". This
list is defined as consisting of persons and affiliates who are disqualified frompublic
contracting and purchasing process because they have been found guilty of a public
6IPage
entity crime. No public entity shall award any contract to or transact any business in
excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017 Florida Statutes for
Category Two (currently $25,000) with any person or affiliated on the "Convicted
Vendor List" for a period of thirty-six (36) months from the date that person or affiliate
was placed on the "Convicted Vendor List" unless that person or affiliate has been
removed from the list. By signing and submitting the RFP proposal forms, Proposer
attests that they have not been placed on the "Convicted Vendor List".
1-15. Code Of Ethics: If any Proposer violates or is a party to a violation of the code
of ethics of the City of Opa-locka or the State of Florida with respect to this proposal,
such Proposer may be disqualified from performing the work described in this
proposal or from furnishing the goods or services for which the proposal is submitted
and shall be further disqualified from submitting any future proposals for work, goods
or services for the City of Opa-locka.
1-16. Drug -Free Workplace: Preference shall be given to businesses with Drug -Free
Workplace (DFW) programs. Whenever two or more proposals which are equal with
respect to price, quality, and service are received by the City for the procurement of
commodities or contractual services, a proposal received from a business that
completes the attached DFW form certifying that it is a DFW shall be given preference
in the award process.
1-17. Permits and Taxes: The Proposer shall procure all permits, pay all charges,
fees, and taxes, and give all notices necessary and incidental to the due and lawful
prosecution of the work
1-18. Protests: Protests of the plans, specifications, and other requirements of the
request for proposal and bids must be received in writing by the City Clerk's Office at
least ten (10) working days prior to the scheduled bid opening. A detailed explanation
of the reason for the protest must be included. Protests of the award or intended award
of the bid or contract must be in writing and received in the City Clerk's Office within
seven (7) working days of the notice of award. A detailed explanation of the protest
must be included.
1-19. Termination for Convenience: A contract may be terminated in whole or in
part by the City at any time and for any reason in accordance with this clause whenever
the City shall determine that such termination is in the best interest of the City. Any
such termination shall be affected by the delivery to the contractor at least five (5)
working days before the effective date of a Notice of Termination specifying the extent
to which performance shall be terminated and the date upon which termination
becomes effective. An equitable adjustment in the contract price shall be made for the
completed service, but no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on
unperformed services.
7JPage
PART II
MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS
SCOPE OF SERVICES:
The scope of work includes the new interior walls and ceiling finishes, restroom
renovations, replacement of exterior doors and windows, new interior doors, stucco
repairs, wood detailing repairs and restoration, new lighting and electrical devices,
new mechanical and plumbing systems, upgrade of fire alarm and fire protection
systems, new roofing for entire complex and observation tower repairs and
restoration. Landscape improvements at courtyards and restoration of a fountain
along with restoration of existing historic finishes, light fixtures, and historic details;
new painting throughout. Selective demolition and indoor air quality testing and
mold remedial if required. The structure shall current requirements for 40 year
building structural and electrical recertification.
The Contractor shall perform the complete work described herein or reasonably
inferable there from, including all demolition and construction services, supervision,
administration services, coordination of all Subcontractors, tests, inspections, and
other items that are necessary to and appropriate for the finishing, equipping and
functioning of the facilities and structures, together with all additional, collateral and
incidental work and services required for the completion of the work.
BONDING REQUIREMENTS
The PROPONENT, in submitting this Bid, shall include a Bid Bond in the amount of 5%
of the total amount of the base Bid on the Bid Bond Form included herein. A company
or personal check shall not be deemed a valid Bid Security.
PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BOND
The City of Opa-locka shall require the successful PROPONENT to furnish a
Performance Bond and Payment Bond, each, in the amount of 100% of the total Bid
Price, including Alternates if any, with the City of Opa-locka as the oblige, as security
for the faithful performance of the Contract and for the payment of all persons
performing labor or furnishing materials in connection herewith. The bonds shall be
with a surety company authorized to do business in the State of Florida.
GOVERNMENTAL RESTRICTIONS
In the event any governmental restrictions may be imposed which would necessitate
alteration of the material quality, workmanship, or performance of the items offered on
this Bid prior to their delivery, it shall be the responsibility of the successful
PROPONENT to notify the City at once, indicating in its letter the specific regulation
which required an alteration. The City of Opa-locka reserves the right to accept any
such alteration, including any price adjustments occasioned thereby, or to cancel at no
further expense to the City.
81P age
AWARD OF BIDS
The City of Opa-locka reserves the right to award the bid to the lowest, most
responsive, responsible PROPONENT, as determined by the City Commission, however
the right of the City to reject any and all bids, to waive any irregularity in the bids or
bidding procedure and subject also to the right of the City to award bid and contract to
PROPONENTS other than the low PROPONENT.
EVALUATION OF BIDS
The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to inspect any/all PROPONENT'S
facilities to determine its capability of meeting the requirements for the Contract.
Also, price, responsibility and responsiveness of the PROPONENT, the financial
position, experience, staffing, equipment, materials, references, and past history of
service to the City and/or with other units of state, and/or local governments in
Florida, or comparable private entities, will be taken into consideration in the Award
of the Contract.
IDENTICAL (TIE BIDS)
Shall be awarded by the City in compliance with Florida State Statutes providing for
a drug free workplace. That is, in the event of an identical Tie Bid, a preference shall
be given to a business having a drug free workplace under Florida Statute Section
287.087, as amended. In case both bidders have a drug free workplace the preference
will be given to local bidders or has commitment to include local sub-contractor(s).
Failure to provide proof of compliance when requested shall be cause for rejection of
the Bid as determined by the City.
HOLD HARMLESS
All PROPONENTS shall hold the City, it's officials and employees harmless and
covenant not to sue the City, it's officials and employees in reference to its decisions
to reject, award, or not award a Bid, as applicable.
NON-CONFORMANCE TO CONTRACT
The City of Opa-locka may withhold acceptance of, or reject items which are found
upon examination, not to meet the specification requirements. Upon written
notification of rejection, items shall be removed within five (5) calendar days by the
vendor at its own expense and redelivered at its expense. Rejected goods left longer
than thirty (30) calendar days will be regarded as abandoned and the City shall have
the right to dispose of them as its own property. Rejection for non-conformance or
failure to meet delivery schedules may result in the Contract being found in default.
9IPage
DEFAULT PROVISION
In case of default by the PROPONENT or CONTRACTOR, the City of Opa-locka may
procure the articles or services from other sources and hold the PROPONENT or
CONTRACTOR responsible for any excess costs occasioned or incurred thereby.
INDEMNIFICATION
The CONTACTOR shall indemnify, save harmless, and defend the City of Opa-locka,
it's officers, agents and employees from and against any claims, demands or causes of
action or nature arising out of error, omission, negligent act, conduct, or misconduct
of the CONTRACTOR, its agents, servants or employees in the provision of goods or
the performance of services pursuant to this Bid and/or from any procurement
decision of the CITY including without limitation, awarding the Contract to the
CONTRACTOR.
11.21 SECONDARY/OTHERVENDORS
The CITY reserves the right in the event the primary vendor cannot provide an
item(s) or service(s) in a timely manner as requested, to seek other sources without
violating the intent of the Contract.
11.22 BID GUARANTEE
The successful PROPONENT shall execute the Contract (Agreement) and provide the
required Performance Bond, Payment Bond and Certificates of Insurance within
ten (10) calendar days of Notice of Award by the City. The PROPONENT who has
the Contract awarded to him and who fails to furnish the Performance and
Payment Bonds and Insurance Certificates within the specified time shall forfeit the
Bid Security that accompanied his Bid, and the Bid Security shall be retained as
liquidated damages by the City. Bid Security deposited in the form of a cashier's check
drawn on a local bank in good standing shall be subject to the same requirements as
a Bid Bond.
11.23 TIME OF COMPLETION
The time of completion of the work to be performed under this contract is the
essence of the contract. Delays and extensions of time may be allowed only in
accordance with the provisions stated in the appropriate section of the General
Conditions. There shall be a $1500 a day liquidated damages for every day that the
project is not completed per the agreed upon schedule.
11.24 SIGNATURE
The legal name of the person or firm submitting the Proposal should be
inserted in Schedule C. The Proposal should be signed by a person authorized to
sign on behalf of the Proponent and include the following:
l0IPage
(a)If the Proponent is a corporation then the full name of the corporation
should be included, together with the names of authorized signatories. The Proposal
should be executed by all of the authorized signatories or by one or more of them
provided that a copy of the corporate resolution authorizing those persons to
execute the Proposal on behalf of the corporation is submitted;
(b) If the Proponent is a partnership or joint venture then the name of the partnership
or joint venture and the name of each partner or joint ventures should be
included, and each partner or joint ventures should sign personally (or, if one or more
person(s) have signing authority for the partnership or joint venture, the partnership
or joint venture should provide evidence to the satisfaction of the City that the
person(s) signing have signing authority for the partnership or joint venture). If a
partner or joint ventures is a corporation then such corporation should sign as
indicated in subsection (a) above; or
(c)If the Proponent is an individual, including a sole proprietorship, the name
of the individual should be included.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION
EVALUATION TEAM
The evaluation of Proposals will be undertaken on behalf of the City by the Evaluation
Team. The Evaluation Team may consult with others including City staff members,
third party consultants and references, as the Evaluation Team may in its discretion
decide is required. The Evaluation Team will give a written recommendation for the
selection of a Preferred Proponent or Preferred Proponents to the City.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Evaluation Team will compare and evaluate all Proposals to determine
the Proponent's strength and ability to provide the Services in order to determine the
Proposal which is most advantageous to the City, using the following criteria:
(a) EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
The City will consider the proponent's past experience in undertaking similar projects
in type, scope, and budget and complexity: 25 pts.
List the profile, experience, and qualifications of the firm, along with the names,
addresses, telephone numbers, licenses, educational background, applicable
certifications, identification of the services provided to historic structures in Florida.
Bidders without historic building experience will not be considered for
evaluation.
Below is a listing of the minimum items that should be submitted:
11 'Page
General information about the firm
➢ Name, physical address, email and phone number of the
firm
➢ List of firm's insurance policies, the insurer, and policy
numbers
> List names and titles of officers of the firm who are directly responsible for
engineering and construction services
➢ Project Organizational Chart with staff availability
➢ Project Manager's name and experience
> Resume of each individual (including sub -selected bidders) who will be
assigned to the project(s), including education, experience, and any other
pertinent information shall be included for each team
➢ Information pertaining to the firm's compliance with
state licensing
➢ Names of sub-bidder(s) the selected bidder intends to use
for this RFP
➢ Experience of the firm(s) in performing design and
construction of building structures
➢ Detailed list of services available directly from the
company
➢ Quality Control Process
➢ Project Management System
➢ Scheduling and Cost Control
➢ Technical Approach specific to the Project
➢ Proof of appropriate Florida certifications and licenses
➢ Fee Schedule - Standard fee schedule
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization and proposed
project team past experience in undertaking similar construction projects in type,
scope, budget, and complexity. Proponent shall identify its past experience for
providing Services that are MOST RELATED TO THIS PROJECT within the last five
(5) years. List the projects in order of priority, with the most relevant project listed
first.
(b) FINANCIAL ABILITY AND RESOURCES
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization's financial ability and
resources to carry out the project: 5 pts.
(c) LOCAL WORKFORCE PARTICIPATION
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization ability to implement
initiatives in compliance with section 3 Federal requirements for local employment,
training and contracts with project area businesses. The bidders are encouraged to
demonstrate intent to hire local resident within the city limits. Project -specific policy to
hire local residents with numbers, i.e., how many project -specific employees are
projected to be hired from the city is expected to be included in the bid package: 10 pts.
121 Page
(d) SCHEDULE AND QUALITY CONTROL
The City will consider the Proponent's proposed project Quality control with timeline
inclusive of mobilization and completion: 5 pt.
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization proposed project
timeline inclusive of mobilization, construction schedule, milestones, closeout and
completion.
(e) PRICE PROPOSAL
The City will consider the proponent's price proposal only in terms of accuracy,
completeness, value, local market and substantiated industry standards: 65 pts.
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's price proposal in terms of
accuracy, completeness, value, local market and substantiated industry standards.
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's responses to attached
questionnaires and all other forms and documents being a part of this RFP and
Proponent's submittal. Items A to E will comprise a technical review as further
described in this RFP. Item F will represent the price proposal.
The Evaluation Team will not be limited to the criteria referred to above, and
the Evaluation Team may consider other criteria that the team identifies as relevant
during the evaluation process. The Evaluation Team may apply the evaluation criteria
on a comparative basis, evaluating the Proposals by comparing one Proponent's
Proposal to another Proponent's Proposal. All criteria considered will be
applied evenly and fairly to all Proposals.
13. DISCREPANCIES IN PROPONENT'S FINANCIAL PROPOSAL
If there are any obvious discrepancies, errors or omissions in the Price Proposal
(Proponent's Financial Proposal), then the City shall be entitled to make obvious
corrections, but only if, and to the extent, the corrections are apparent from the
Proposal as submitted, and in particular:
(a) If there is a discrepancy between a unit price and the extended total, then the unit
prices shall be deemed to be correct, and corresponding corrections will be made to
the extended totals;
(b) If a unit price has been given but the corresponding extended total has been
omitted, then the extended total will be calculated from the unit price and the
estimated quantity; and,
(c) If an extended total has been given but the corresponding unit price has been
omitted, then the unit price will be calculated from the extended total and the estimated
quantity
131 Page
3.1 Proposal Requirements
The proposal shall include the following:
1. Understanding of the Scope of Work.
Describe your understanding of the work to be performed.
2. Experience and Qualifications of Firm.
List similar projects successfully completed within the last
five (5) years.
3. Key Personnel.
Please provide the names and qualifications of the
key personnel assigned to this contract.
4. References.
Provide a list of references from the past and
current clients within the last five (5) years.
5 Schedule.
Contractor shall submit a timeline as to when each task will
be completed
6. Fee Proposal.
The fee proposal will be reviewed but is not the sole
factor in the selection process. Submit
documentation associated with the pricing of each
task.
141 Page
PART III
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
3-1 RULES FOR PROPOSALS
In order to maintain comparability and enhance the review process, proposals shall be
organized in the manner specified below and include all information required herein.
The proposal must name all persons or entities interested in the proposal as principals.
The proposal must declare that it is made without collusion with any other person or
entity submitting a proposal pursuant to this RFP.
3-2 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
The proposal shall be submitted on 8 1/2 "x 11" paper, portrait orientation, with
headings and sections numbered appropriately. Ensure that all information is written
legibly or typed. The following should be submitted for a proposing firm to be
considered:
3.2.1 Cover Page - Show the name of Proposer's agency/firm, address, telephone
number, name of contact person, date, and the proposal number and description.
3.2.2 Tab 1 - Table of Contents
Include a clear identification of the material by section and by page number.
3.2.3 Tab 2 - Letter of Transmittal
3.2.3.1 Limit to one or two pages.
3.2.3.2 Briefly state the Proposers understanding of the work to be done and
make a positive commitment to perform the work.
3.2.3.3 Give the names of the persons who will be authorized to make
representations for the Proposer, their titles, addresses and telephone numbers.
3.2.3.4 Provide an official signature of a Corporate Officer certifying the contents
of the Proposer's responses to the City's Request for Proposal.
3.2.4 Tab 3 - General Information
3.2.4.1 Name of Business.
3.2.4.2 Mailing Address and Phone Number.
3.2.4.3 Names and contact information of persons to be contacted for
information or services if different from name of person in charge.
3.2.4.4 Normal business hours.
3.2.4.5 State if business is local, national, or international and indicate the
business legal status (corporation, partnership, etc.).
3.2.4.6 Give the date business was organized and/or incorporated, and where.
3.2.4.7 Give the location of the office from which the work is to be done and the
number of professional staff employees at that office.
15IPage
3.2.4.8 Indicate whether the business is a parent or subsidiary in a group of
firms/agencies. If it is, please state the name of the parent company.
3.2.4.9 State if the business is licensed, permitted and/or certified to do business
in the State of Florida and attach copies of all such licenses issued to the business
entity.
3.2.5 Tab 4 - Project Approach
Describe in detail your proposal to fulfill the requirements of the scope of services
listed in section 2.2 of this RFP.
3.2.6 Tab 5 - Experience and Qualifications
3.2.6.1 Specify the number of years the Proposer has been in business.
3.2.6.2 Identify the Proposer's qualifications to perform the services identified
in this RFP as listed in section 2-2 of the Scope of Services.
Include resumes, not exceeding one page each, of all key personnel who will be
assigned to the City.
3.2.7 Tab 6 - Schedule
3.2.7.1 Include a timetable that identifies the amount of time required to
complete each component of the Program.
3.2.7.2 Indicate the earliest available start date for your project team.
3.2.7.3 Indicate the project completion date based on the date provided in
3.2.7.1.
3.2.8 Tab 7 - Pricing of Services
3.2.8.1 Fee basis should be an all-inclusive, base fee.
3.2.9 Tab 8 - References
3.2.9.1 List a minimum of three (3) references in Florida for which the proposer
has provided elevator services. Include the name of the organization, brief
description of the project, name of contact person telephone number and email
address.
3.2.10 Tab 9 - Additional Forms
Proposers must compete and submit as part of its Proposal all of the following
forms and/or documents
• Proposer Qualifications
• Certification regarding debarment and suspension
• Drug Free workplace certification
FAILURE TO SUBMIT ALL OF THE ABOVE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION MAY
DISQUALIFY PROPOSER.
161Page
PART IV
EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
4-1 SELECTION COMMITTEE
A Selection Committee, consisting of City personnel, will convene, review and discuss
all proposals submitted.
The Selection Committee will use a point formula during the review process to score
proposals and assign points in the evaluation process in accordance with the evaluation
criteria. The Proposer shall satisfy and explicitly respond to all the requirements of the
RFP including a detailed explanation of how the services shall be performed.
Each proposal will be reviewed to determine if the Proposal is responsive to the
submission requirements outlines in the Solicitation. A responsive Proposal is one
which follows the requirements of this Solicitation that includes all documents are
submitted in the format outlined in this Solicitation, is of timely submission, and has
the appropriate signatures as required on each document. Failure to comply with these
requirements may result in the Proposal being deemed non -responsive. The Contract
(s) will be awarded to the most responsive proposer whose Proposal best serves the
interest of and represents the best values to the City of Opa-locka.
4-2 EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Committee may select and choose to invite any and/or or all firms to make a
presentation and be interviewed by the Committee as part of the evaluation process
for this Solicitation. The Committee's decision will be communicated by staff to all
Respondents. The Respondent's presentation may clarify but may not modify their
submitted proposal. Any discussion between the presenter (s) and Evaluation
Committee during presentations are intended only for purposes of providing
clarification in response to questions from the Committee.
Category
Points
Experience and Qualifications of professional personnel assigned to project
List the profile, experience, and qualifications of the firm, along with the names, addresses, telephone numbers,
licenses, educational background, applicable certifications, identification of the services provided to historic
structures in Florida. Bidders without historic building experience will not be considered for evaluation.
25
Financial Ability and Resources
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization's financial ability and resources to carry out the
project.
5
Local Workforce Participation
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization ability to implement initiatives in compliance with
section 3 Federal requirements for local employment, training and contracts with project area businesses. The
bidders are encouraged to demonstrate intent to hire local resident within the city limits. Project -specific policy to hire
local residents with numbers, i.e. how many project -specific employees are projected to be hired from the city is
expected to be included in the bid package.
10
17lPage
Schedule and Quality Control
5
The City will consider the Proponent's proposed project Quality control with timeline inclusive of mobilization and
completion:
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's organization proposed project timeline inclusive of mobilization,
construction schedule, milestones, closeout, and completion.
Price Proposal
The City will consider the proponent's price proposal only in terms of accuracy, completeness, value, local market,
and substantiated industry standards:
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's price proposal in terms of accuracy, completeness, value, local
market, and substantiated industry standards.
The Evaluation Team will consider the Proponent's responses to attached questionnaires and all other forms and
documents being a part of this RFP and Proponent's submittal. Items will comprise a technical review as further
described in this RFP. Item f will represent the price proposal.
The Evaluation Team will not be limited to the criteria referred to above, and the Evaluation Team may consider other
criteria that the team identifies as relevant during the evaluation process. The Evaluation Team may apply the
evaluation criteria on a comparative basis, evaluating the Proposals by comparing one Proponent's Proposal to
another Proponent's Proposal. All criteria considered will be applied evenly and fairly to all Proposals.
TOTAL
65
100
4-3 ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Proposers may be required to make individual presentations to the City Selection
Committee in order to clarify their proposals. Only those firms with the highest rated
scores in accordance with the stated criteria and their weights will be invited to give
oral presentations. However, the City has the right to accept the best proposal as
submitted, without discussion or negotiation.
If the City determines that such presentations are needed, a time and place will be
scheduled for oral presentations. Each Proposer shall be prepared to discuss and
substantiate any of the areas of the proposal submitted, and its qualifications to
perform the specified services. During the oral presentations, the Proposers should
relate their discussion to the evaluation criteria, which will include (but not be limited
to) their approach to the project. The proposed Project Manager must be in attendance.
The Evaluation Criteria may be changed for the oral presentation evaluation phase.
References and site visits (if completed) shall be included in the final evaluation
criteria, along with other criteria and weights as determined by the Selection
Committee. Finalists will be informed as to the revised criteria, if any, prior to their
oral presentation.
Additionally, prior to award of an Agreement pursuant to this RFP, the City may require
Proposers to submit such additional information bearing upon the Proposer's ability to
perform the services in the Agreement as the City deems appropriate.
181 Page
4-4 FINAL SELECTION
The City of Opa-locka will select the firm that meets the best interests of the City. The
City shall be the sole judge of its own best interests, the proposals, and the resulting
negotiated agreement. The City's decisions will be final. Following the notification of
the selected firm, it is expected that an Agreement will be executed between both
parties. City staff will recommend award to the responsible Proposer whose Proposal
is determined to provide overall best value to the City, considering the evaluation
factors in this RFP.
4-5 AWARD AND CONTRACT EXECUTION
After review by the Selection Committee of the proposals and oral presentations a
recommendation will be made to the City Manager for submission to the City
Commission for final approval. Upon Commission authorization, contract negotiations
will be initiated with the first ranked firm. If those negotiations are unsuccessful, the
City will formally terminate negotiations with the first ranked firm and will commence
contract negotiations with the next ranked firm, etc. Upon successful contract
negotiations with the prevailing firm, the remaining firms will be notified that the
process has been completed and that they were not selected.
191Page
RFP NO. 2 2-XXXXXXX
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS
REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL
The Proposer, as a result of this proposal, MUST hold a County and/or Municipal Contractor's
Occupational License in the area of their fixed business location. The following information
MUST be completed and submitted with the proposal to be considered:
1. Legal Name and Address:
Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip: Phone/Fax:
2. Check One: Corporation () Partnership () Individual ()
3. If Corporation, state:
Date of Incorporation: State in which Incorporated:
4. If an out-of-state Corporation, currently authorized to do business in Florida, give
date of such authorization:
5. Name and Title of Principal Officers Date Elected:
6. The length of time in business: years
7. The length of time (continuous) in business as a service organization in Florida:
years
8. Provide a list of at least three commercial or government references that the bidder has
supplied service/commodities meeting the requirements of the City of Opa-locka
specification, during the last twenty-four months.
9. A copy of County and/or Municipal Occupational License(s)
Note: Information requested herein and submitted by the proposers will be analyzed by the City of Opa-locka and will be a factor
considered in awarding any resulting contract The purpose is to ensure that the Contractors, in the sole opinion of the City of Opa-
locka, can sufficiently and efficiently perform all the required services in a timely and satisfactory manner as will be required by the
subject contract. If there are any terms and/or conditions that are in conflict, the most stringent requirement shall apply.
20 P
RFP NO: 22-XXXXXXX
PRICE PROPOSAL FORM
REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC CITY HALL
PROPONENT understands and agrees that the Contract Price is the lump sum to furnish
and install all of the Work complete in place. Vendor's price will not be adjusted unless
the CITY changes the scope of the Project after the Contract Date.
As such, the Vendor shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, tools,
superintendence, and services necessary to provide a complete, in place Project for the
Proposed Price of:
2022 CONSTRUCTION COST SCHEDULE
Division
Description Estimate
TOTALS
2 Site Demolition & Cleaning
2 Selective demo & cleaning bldg.
2 Sitework
2 Landscaping
2 Irrigation
2 Pavers
2 Fountain repair
DIVISION 2 TOTALS $
DIVISION 3
3 Minaret tower repair $
3 Elev Tower $
3 SW Tower $
3 Site Wall $
3 Ext Stair Repairs $
DIVISION 3 TOTALS $
DIVISION 4
4 CMU Brick Repointing
DIVISION 4 TOTALS
DIVISION 5
5
5
5
5
5
Spiral Stair Rust clean & complete
Access Ladder - tower
Reinstall Top Core
Lift Cabin & Weld
Bridge Alum Rail
211P
DIVISION 5 TOTALS $
DIVISION 6
6 Rough Carpentry -
6 Restore Interior Stair
6 Restore Interior Stair - handrail
6 Final repair - Ext Balcony
6 Finish millwork
6 2nd & 3rd floor wood decking
DIVISION 6 TOTALS $
DIVISION 7
7 Finial Repair & Installation
7 Demolition BUR & damaged wood decking
7 New roof wood decking
7 New Roofing (insulation & BUR) as
per Roof Consultant
Recommendations
7 Repair broken tiles
7 Roofing Standing Seam
7 Joint Sealer
7 Domes repair
7 Cleanoutscupper
DIVISION 7 TOTALS $
DIVISION 8
8 HM Doors & Frames
8 Door Hardware
8 Access Panels & Louvers
8 Windows - finish trim & repair broken
glass
DIVISION 8 TOTALS $
DIVISION 9
9 Stucco
9 Ceramic Tile
9 LVT Floor
9 Base
9 Wood Floor - Rehab
9 Acoustical Ceiling
9 Framing - finish
9 Selective demo & install
insulation
9 Drywall
9 Wood Beams at Council
9 Exterior Painting
9 Interior Painting
DIVISION 9 TOTALS $
221Page
DIVISION 10
10 Toilet Accessories
10 Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets
10 Signage $
DIVISION 10 TOTALS $
DIVISION 14
14 Elevator complete
DIVISION 14 TOTALS
DIVISION 15
15 Fire Sprinklers complete
15 Snake Underground Sanitary
Piping to verify condition
15 Complete Wall Rough Plumbing
15 Plumbing Fixtures
15 Sump Pump Elevator
15 HVAC Equipment
15 Ductwork
15 Test & Balance
DIVISION 15 TOTALS $
DIVISION 16
16 Electrical Gear & Panel review
16 Light Fixtures (new vs old)
16 Fire & Security Alarm
16 Misc Pipe & Wire
16 Electrical Labor - complete scope
DIVISION 16 TOTALS
ESTIMATE TOTAL COST
GENERAL CONDITONS & OHP - Assume 10%
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE $
231Page
SUBMITTED DAY
THIS OF
BID SUBMITTED BY:
2022.
Company Telephone Number
Name of Person Authorized to
Submit Bid
Signature
Title
Fax Number
Email Address
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION
PROPOSED DEBARMENT AND OTHER MATTERS OF
RESPONSIBILITY
1. The Proposer certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that the Proposer and/or any of its
Principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the
award of contracts by any Federal agency.
B. Have not, within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or
subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or
commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making
false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property; and
C. Are not presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph 1-B of this provision.
2. The Proposer has not, within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts
terminated for default by any City, State or Federal agency.
A. "Principals," for the purposes of this certification, means officers; directors; owners; partners;
and, persons having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity
(e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a subsidiary, division, or business segment, and
similar positions). This Certification Concerns a Matter Within the jurisdiction of an Agency of the
United States and the Making of a False, Fictitious, or Fraudulent Certification May Render the
Maker Subject to Prosecution Under Section 1001, Title 18, United States Code.
B. The Proposer shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time
prior to contract award, the Proposer learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or
has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
C. A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily
result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be
considered in connection with a determination of the Proposer's responsibility. Failure of the
Proposer to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the
Contracting Officer may render the Proposer non -responsive.
D. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of
records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this
provision. The knowledge and information of a Proposer is not required to exceed that which is
normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
E. The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Proposer knowingly
25
rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the
Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.
AS THE PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE STATEMENT, I CERTIFY THAT THIS FIRM COMPLIES
FULLY WITH THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.
Signature
Printed Name
26
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
RFP NO. 22-XXXXXXX
DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION FORM
Whenever two (2) or more bids/proposals, which are equal with respect to price, quality, and service, are
received by the CITY OF OPA-LOCKA for the procurement of commodities or contractual services, a
bid/proposal received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug -free workplace
program shall be given preference in the award process. In order to have a drug -free workplace program,
a business shall:
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing,
possession or use of controlled substances is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions
that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug -free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse
violations.
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are under
bid a copy of the statement specified in number (1).
4. In the statement specified in number (1), notify the employees that as a condition for working on
the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of
the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction on or plea of guilty or no contest to any
violation of Chapter 893, Florida Statutes or of any controlled substance law of the United States or
any singular state, for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such
conviction.
5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community by any employee who is so
convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through implementation of
Section 287.087, Florida Statutes.
This Certification is submitted by the
(Name)
of
(Title/Position) (Company)
who does hereby certify that said Company has implemented a drug -free workplace program, which meets
the requirements of Section 287.087, Florida Statutes, which are identified in numbers (1) through (6)
above.
Date Signature
27
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA - COUNTY OF MIAMI DADE
being first duly sworn, deposes and says that:
(1) He/She/They is/are the
(Owner, Partner, Officer, Representative or Agent) of
the PROPONENT that has submitted the attached
proposal;
(2) He/She/They is/are fully informed respecting the preparation and contents of the attached
Proposal and of all pertinent circumstances respecting such Proposal;
(3) Such Proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham Proposal;
(4) Neither the said PROPONENT nor any of its officers, partners, owners, agents, representatives,
employees or parties in interest, including this affiant, have in any way colluded, conspired,
connived or agreed, directly or indirectly, with any other PROPONENT, firm, or person to submit
a collusive or sham Proposal in connection with the Work for which the attached Proposal has
been submitted; or to refrain from Proposing in connection with such Work; or have in any
manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement or collusion, or communication, or
conference with any PROPONENT, firm, or person to fix any overhead, profit, or cost elements
of the Proposal or of any other PROPONENT, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost elements of
the Proposed Price or the Proposed Price of any other PROPONENT, or to secure through any
collusion, conspiracy, connivance, or unlawful agreement any advantage against (Recipient), or
any person interested in the proposed Work;
(5) The price or prices quoted in the attached Proposal are fair and proper and are not tainted by
any collusion, conspiracy, connivance, or unlawful agreement on the part of the PROPONENT or
any other of its agents, representatives, owners, employees or parties of interest, including this
affiant.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of:
By:
Witness Signature
Witness Print Name and Title
28
NON-DISCRIMINATION AFFIDAVIT
I, the undersigned, hereby duly sworn, depose and say that the organization, business or entity
represented herein shall not discriminate against any person in its operations, activities or delivery of
services under any agreement it enters into with the City of Opa-locka. The same shall affirmatively comply
with all applicable provisions of federal, state and local equal employment laws and shall not engage in or
commit any discriminatory practice against any person based on race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual
orientation, national origin, marital status, physical or mental disability, political affiliation or any other
factor which cannot be lawfully used as a basis for service delivery.
By:
Title:
Sworn and subscribed before this
day of _ , 20
Notary Public, State of Florida
(Printed Name)
My commission expires:
29
E -VERIFY
Effective January 1, 2021, public and private employers, contractors and subcontractors will be required
to register with, and use of the E -verify system in order to verify the work authorization status of all newly
hired employees. Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees to utilize the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security's E -Verify System to verify the employment eligibility of:
a) All persons employed by Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform employment duties within Florida
during the term of the contract; and
b) All persons (including sub-vendors/sub-contractors) assigned by Vendor /Consultant/ Contractor to
perform work pursuant to the contract with the Department. The Vendor /Consultant/ Contractor
acknowledges and agrees that use of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System during
the term of the contract is a condition of the contract with the City; and
By entering into a Contract, the Contractor becomes obligated to comply with the provisions of Section
448.095, Fla. Stat., "Employment Eligibility," as amended from time to time. This includes but is not limited to
utilization of the E -Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees, and
requiring all subcontractors to provide an affidavit attesting that the subcontractor does not employ, contract
with, or subcontract with, an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for
the duration of the contract. Failure to comply will lead to termination of this Contract, or if a subcontractor
knowingly violates the statute, the subcontract must be terminated immediately. If t contract is terminated
for a violation of the statute by the Contractor, the Contractor may not be awarded a public contract for a
period of 1 year after the date of termination. The Contractor acknowledges it is liable to the City for any
additional costs as a result of termination of the contract due to Contractor's failure to comply with the
provisions herein.
30
E -VERIFY FORM
Definitions:
"Contractor" means a person or entity that has entered or is attempting to enter into a contract with a
public employer to provide labor, supplies, or services to such employer in exchange for salary, wages, or
other remuneration.
"Subcontractor" means a person or entity that provides labor, supplies, or services to or for a contractor or
another subcontractor in exchange for salary, wages, or other remuneration.
Effective January 1, 2021, public and private employers, contractors and subcontractors will begin
required registration with, and use of the E -verify system in order to verify the work authorization status
of all newly hired employees. Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees to utilize the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System to verify the employment eligibility of:
a) All persons employed by Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform employment duties within
Florida during the term of the contract; and
b) All persons (including sub-vendors/subcompanies/subcontractors) assigned by
Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform work pursuant to the contract with the Department. The
Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees that use of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security's E -Verify System during the term of the contract is a condition of the contract
with the City of Opa-locka; and
Should vendor become successful Contractor awarded for the above -named project, by entering into this
Contract, the Contractor becomes obligated to comply with the provisions of Section 448.095, Fla. Stat.,
"Employment Eligibility," as amended from time to time. This includes but is not limited to utilization of
the E -Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees, and requiring all
subcontractors to provide an affidavit attesting that the subcontractor does not employ, contract with, or
subcontract with, an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the
duration of the contract. Failure to comply will lead to termination of this Contract, or if a subcontractor
knowingly violates the statute, the subcontract must be terminated immediately. If this contract is
terminated for a violation of the statute by the Contractor, the Contractor may not be awarded a public
contract for a period of 1 year after the date of termination.
Company Name:
Authorized Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
31