Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout22-067 - Ratifying Grant Application for FDEP Resilient Florida Grant for the rehab of lift stations 9 and 16Sponsored by: Interim City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 22-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA- LOCKA, FLORIDA, RATIFYING A GRANT APPLICATION FOR A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (FDEP) RESILIENT FLORIDA GRANT FOR THE REHABILITATION OF LIFT STATIONS 9 AND 16, WITHIN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Interim City Manager of the City of Opa-Locka has applied for a grant provided by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) (Resilient Florida Grant), which provides grants to effectively address the impacts of flooding and sea level rise that municipalities are facing; and WHEREAS, Grant recipients will receive funding assistance to analyze and plan for vulnerabilities, as well as implement projects for adaptation and mitigation. WHEREAS, renovation of Lift Station 9 and 16, within the City of Opa-Locka ("City"), are deemed to be qualified for this grant. The total amount of the grant request is One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000.00) with no City matching contribution required; and WHEREAS, the project involves the upgrades of Lift Stations 9 and 16 into more compact submersible configurations, which includes the installation of a new wet -well, valve vault, control panel, pumps, and associated pipeline. The stations are currently above ground and will be demolished. They will be replaced by below ground facilities, and the sites will be restored with new grass areas; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds it in the best interest of the City and its residents to ratify the grant application, as described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA- LOCKA, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference. SECTION 2. The City Commission of the City of Opa-Locka, Florida, hereby ratifies the submission of the grant application for a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Resilient Florida Grant for the rehabilitation of Lift Stations 9 and 16, within the City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". SECTION 3. Sections of this Resolution may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of typographical errors which do not affect the intent may be authorized by the City Manager, following review by the City Attorney and without need of public -....,..,:— l-., r:1:...— „ -----4---I ..c ..,;j -t. i-t.,, (;,-., Resolution No. 22-067 SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect upon the adoption and is subject to the approval of the Governor or Governor's Designee. PASSED and ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2022 John H /' aylor'Jr., Mayor A ,TEST: Joa !i a Flores, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Burnadette Nor"ri City Attorney Moved by: Commissioner Bass Seconded by: Commissioner Williams VOTE: 5-0 Commissioner Bass YES Commissioner Kelley YES Commissioner Williams YES Vice Mayor Ervin YES Mayor Taylor YES 2 City of Opa-locka Agenda Cover Memo Department Manager: Adelina Gross Department Manager Signature: ), s. i `� -� ry �,., , Interim City Manager: Darvin Williams CM Signature: /,�• �t� ,� el/' _�L" ` .. �t Commission Meeting Date: 12/14/2022 Item Type: (EnterXin box) Resolution Ordinance Other X Fiscal Impact: (EnterXin box) Yes No Ordinance Reading. (EnterXin box) 1st Reading 2nd Reading X Public Hearing: (EnterXinbox) Yes No Yes No X X Funding Source: Account# : (Enter Fund & Dept) Ex: Advertising Requirement: (EnterXin box) Yes No X Contract/P.O. Required: (EnterXin box) Yes No RFP/RFQ/Bid#: X Strategic Plan Related (EnterXin box) Yes No Strategic Plan Priority Enhance Organization Bus. & Economic Bev Public Safety Quality of Education Qual. of Life & City Image Communication Area: 0 . E Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy: (list the specific objective/strategy this item will address) X 0 Sponsor Name City Manager Department: Capital Improvement Program City Manager Short Title: Ratification of Resilient Florida Grant Application for Lift Stations 9 and 16 Staff Summary: In conjunction with the City's grant writing service, staff has applied for a grant provided by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) (Resilient Florida Grant), which provides grants to effectively address the impacts of flooding and sea level rise that municipalities are facing. Grant recipients will receive funding assistance to analyze and plan for vulnerabilities, as well as implement projects for adaptation and mitigation. Renovation of Lift Station 9 and 16 are deemed to be qualified for this grant. The total amount of the grant request is $1,500,000 with no City matching contribution required. The project involves the upgrades of Lift Stations 9 and 16 into more compact submersible configurations, which includes installation of a new wet -well, valve vault, control panel, pumps, and associated pipeline. The stations, which are currently above ground, will be demolished and replaced with below ground structures. The sites will be restored with new grass. Funding of the rehabilitation of these Lift Stations has also been requested under a separate grant program to increase the likelihood of grant funding being received to complete this project without using ARPA funds. Financial Impact: Lift Stations 9 and 16 are two of the highest priority City projects. They are currently included on the tentative list of ARPA-funded projects. Receipt of this grant will free up $1,500,000 of ARPA funds for other projects. There is no City match requirement for this grant. The cost of submitting this grant application is covered in the $75,000 budget for this service in the approved FY 23 Budget. Proposed Action: Staff recommends the City Commission ratify the submission of a Resilient Florida grant application for rehabilitation of Lift Stations 9 and 16 Attachment: 1. Submitted Application C I IY OF OPA LOCKA FLORIDA P.' 1111 Stato Elevatioii 11 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Resilient Florida Program 9/12/22, 11:53 AM RCP Existing Applications HOME (/GRANTS/S/) FRDAP v ORCP N./ CONTACT MANAGEMENT (/GRANTS/S/CONTACT-MANAGEME GRANT APPLICATIONS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW RCP Grant Applications Application Type N., Applicant Name N., Project Name Alexandria Avenue Flood Protec Funding for Resilient Florida - Infrastruct... City of Opa-Locka Funding for Resilient Florida - Infrastruct... City of Opa-Locka Funding for Resilient Florida - Planning P... City of Opa-Locka View Existing Application Application Resilient Florida - Infrastructure Grants 1. Applicant Information Applicant Account 0 City of Opa-Locka Pump Station Elevation Critical Infrastructure Vulnerabi X Applicant Grant Manager 0 Adelina Gross X Applicant Authorized Signee 0 Darvin Williams X Applicant Fiscal Agent 0 Niema Walker X 2. Project Information Choose the Entity Category: 0 County, Municipality, or Authorized Special District Addressing Risks of Flooding or Sea Level Rise Identified in a Vulnerability Assessm... Choose the project type you are submitting: 0 Available Chosen Adapt critical assets to effects of flooding and sea level rise Domestic Wastewater Infrastructure https://fdep.force.com/grants/s/rcp-existing-applications 1/5 9/12/22, 11:53 AM Mitigate threats from flooding and sea level rise Coastal Flood Control Cultural or Community Resource Drinking Water Supply ` (required) Project Title 0 Pump Station Elevation List the City(ies)/Town(s)Nillage(s) 0 City of Opa-locka Project Geo Location Latitude Longitude RCP Existing Applications 4 Project Location (narrative) 0 The City of Opa-Locka was incorporated in 1926 and is located within the northwestern area of Miami -Dade County within a geographic area of 4.2 square miles. The City has a mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial zones in addition to a general aviation airport. }n i} :r ,n}inin-.}n.1 }k-,} State Lands or State Parks Utilized 0 No v Area Served 0 Available Alachua Baker Bay Bradford Brevard Sponsor City/County 0 --None-- 2A. General Information v Background 4 Chosen Miami -Dade Explain the demonstrated need(s) and how the project will address those needs. One of the most significant challenges for the community is effective wastewater management and the mitigation of threats to the essential sewer service. Many of the City's sanitary sewer pump stations are not resilient and are vulnerable to the impacts of Flnn.dinn ....A n}I"n. }..r�l ...n-.}L.nr nnn.li}innr A, - Explain how the proposed project fits into the Project Types chosen above. https://fdep.force.com/grants/s/rcp-existing-applications 2/5 9/12/22, 11:53 AM RCP Existing Applications The development of resilient wastewater infrastructure fits into the project category "Domestic wastewater infrastructure?' The project will rehabilitate three critical assets in the pump stations. The hardening of the stations will mitigate increasing risks from 2B. Project Scoring Criteria > Tier 1 Criteria Information > Tier 2 Criteria Information > Tier 3 Criteria Information > Tier 4 Criteria Information > Additional Information > Multiagency Information 3. Project Work Plan Please review the RPG Project Types and Annual Priorities. If including any letters of support or other materials, they should specifically address the Work Plan. Project Summary 0 To meet the need of these residents and the surrounding businesses, the City will rehabilitate three wastewater lift stations serving three project impact areas with 331 properties impacted. In addition to hardening the stations to provide reliable and safe sewer Ft.n n....i.n.....n..F c t i-.... Project Description 0 As a result of the vulnerabilities each of the lift stations currently face, the City has already initiated design and engineering. The final plans are anticipated to be complete by the end of December, with permitting to follow in early 2023. The project will be ready to bid Files Uploaded Name Type Median Household - 2020 US Census - Opa locka PDF PS Project Impact Maps PDF Application Tasks Complete information about the Tasks Tasks Task Number v Title N., Work Performed By v Task Description 1 Bidding and Contractor Select... Contractor only The City will include t 2 Construction Contractor only The City will enter int 3 Project Management Contractor only The City will perform https://fdep.force.com/grants/s/rcp-existing-applications 3/5 9/12/22, 11:53 AM RCP Existing Applications Input task information below. At least one task is required to submit the application. Please select "Create New Project Task" to save the record. Once a task is created, it will be added to the table above. To add additional tasks, update the details below and select `Create New Project Task': To edit a task after creation, you must delete the entry and create a new task to replace it with the correct details. To delete, select the arrow on the table next to the associated task, and select 'delete': Then enter the correct task information below and select `Create New Task': Application Tasks Budget Category Tasks Budget Category Task Number v Budget Expense A 3 $88,000.00 2 $1,400,000.00 1 $12,000.00 Input task budget category information below. Select "Create New Application Task Budget" to save the entry. Repeat for each task until completed. If multiple budget categories are needed for a single task, submit multiple entries until the budget for that task is completed. Application Tasks Personnel Grantee Task Personnel Grantee Complete information about the Task Personnel Task Number v Position Title v Maximum Hours NOTE: This section is only necessary if the GRANTEE is performing work on the project as indicated previously under "Task Category." This section is NOT required if a contractor is the only budget category on the project. Enter the Task Personnel Information for the Grantee https://fdep.force.com/grants/s/rcp-existing-applications 4/5 City of Opa-locka Pump Station Elevation 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Municipality: City of Opa-locka Grant Manager: Adelina Gross Authorized Signee: Darvin Williams Fiscal Agent: Niema Walker 2. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Type - Highlight the project type: Mitigate threats from flooding and sea level rise Coastal flood control Cultural or community resource X Domestic wastewater infrastructure Drinking water supply Emergency facilities Land acquisition and conservation Living shoreline and erosion control Natural system restoration Stormwater infrastructure Transportation and evacuation Utilities infrastructure Preconstruction Activities - including design and permitting Industrial Wastewater Infrastructure Neighborhood -scale Property Floodproofing and Elevation Project Title Pump Station Elevation Project Geo Location (optional) Latitude: Longitude: Project Location (narrative) The City of Opa-Locka was incorporated in 1926 and is located within the northwestern area of Miami - Dade County within a geographic area of 4.2 square miles. The City has a mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial zones in addition to a general aviation airport. Similar to the rest of South Florida, the City continues to witness a growth in population, and it is anticipated that with the redevelopment initiatives the City has introduced, there will be significant growth within the next ten - to -twenty-year time frame. It is therefore incumbent on the City to ensure that its infrastructure meets the current and projected needs of not only an increase in residents but also the growing threat of flooding from changing conditions in the climate. The project will be implemented in three sanitary service areas/basins located within the City. Each basin is serviced by a lift station that conveys wastewater to the main collection lines and to the treatment facilities. The project impact areas will consist of each basin. Lift station #9 is located near NW 151St in the northern portion of the City and provides sewer to 213 properties. Lift Station #12 is within a commercial area between NW 42"d Avenue and Graighton Parkway. The area is situated on the very western border of the community near the airport. The third project site and impact area is Lift Station #16, also located in the western part of the City. The project impact area includes 27 properties that are served by the stations. State Lands Utilized Yes x No Area Served (County): Miami -Dade BACKGROUND Explain the demonstrated need the project will address those needs. One of the most significant challenges for the community is effective wastewater management and the mitigation of threats to the essential sewer service. Many of the City's sanitary sewer pump stations are not resilient and are vulnerable to the impacts of flooding and other natural weather conditions. As conditions in the region continue to produce frequent and more severe storms, there is an immediate need to address this problem. The City has completed several major planning initiatives to address these issues and identify the most impactful course of action to protect, first and foremost, public safety and health but also further the economic redevelopment of the community. The threat from a changing climate to the wastewater system is increasing each year. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the level of contamination, which would improve the physical health of the citizens and reduce wastewater leakage, which could pollute waterways with excess nutrients that wreak havoc on the ecosystems by fueling harmful fumes that could put human health at risk, cause fish kills, and affect coral reefs of interconnecting water surfaces. Rehabilitation of three lift stations by hardening and modernizing them will reduce the potential for these threats to impact service. The elimination of sewage ex -filtration within lift station service areas also poses a threat to the groundwater if not effectively conveyed to the treatment facilities. Explain how the proposed project fits into the Project Types chosen above. The development of resilient wastewater infrastructure fits into the project category "Domestic wastewater infrastructure." The project will rehabilitate three critical assets in the pump stations. The hardening of the stations will mitigate increasing risks from severe weather such as flooding. The project is needed to ensure reliable and safe wastewater service to 331 properties in the impact areas PROJECT SCORING CRITERIA Tier 1 Criteria Information Does the project reduce risk of flooding or sea level rise identified in a comprehensive vulnerability assessment or the comprehensive statewide flood vulnerability and sea level rise assessment? Yes x No If Yes, please explain. Does the project reduce risk of compound flooding identified in a vulnerability assessment or the comprehensive statewide flood vulnerability and sea level rise assessment? Yes x No If Yes, please explain. Does the project reduce risk to or adapt a regionally significant asset? This can include relocation. Yes x No If Yes, please explain. What percent of critical assets in the project impact area are considered to be vulnerable? None 1 - 19% 20 - 39% 40% - 59% 60 - 79% x 80% or more Please describe the method used to determine the percent selected as well as provide a list of critical assets in the project impact area. The project will provide protection for three sanitary sewer lift stations that are critical assets. Each one of the assets is vulnerable. Does the project contribute to existing flood mitigation projects that reduce upland flood damage cost by incorporating new or enhanced structure or natural system restoration and reveeetation? Yes, by incorporating new or enhanced structure Yes, by incorporating natural system restoration and revegetation Yes, by incorporating BOTH new or enhanced structure AND natural system restoration and revegetation x No If Yes, please explain. Tier 2 Criteria Information What is the current frequency of flooding or erosion in the project impact area? No Current flooding or erosion x Has experienced flooding or erosion in the last 3 years Has been flooded at least 3 times in the last 5 years or is experiencing ongoing erosion If area has been flooded 3 times in 5 years or is experiencing ongoing erosion, please explain and provide documentation. What is the current seven of floodin: or erosion in the None • ro ect im • act area? No current floodin: or erosion last 3 or has ever ex•erienced unmiti:ated erosion Floodin reater than 3 inches in as ears greater than 1 foot in the currentor erosion is critical for the critical asset class ch of the previous three calendar years, has been flooded for 7 consecutive da in e t and of revious If the project impact area has been flooded consecutive days,reater than 1 or ehosion sncritical fohthetc the al asset three calendar years, has been flooded for class, please explain and provide documentation. Status of project design Not Desi:ned Partially desi:ned or site -specific environmental or :eotechnical eop operlye been co by d Design is complete (To receive points for a completed design, plans application.) professional in the relevant field must be submitted with the app Permitting and easement acquisition status ermits and easements have been identified Necessa • been lied for or at least one • ermit has been a • • rove d All • ermits have a • All necessa •ermit(s) and easement(s) have been authorized/obtained • No permits or easements are required for the project plicable, please provide a list of necessary permits/easements and application statutes. following approvals/permits: If a• The proposed scope of work for the project will require the g • City of Opa-locka Engineering MD WASD) • Miami Dade Water and Sewer Dept. • Miami Dade RER Wastewater Section Are local funding sources committed as cost share or is the project in a financially disadvantaged small community as defined in 380.093(5)(e), F.S.. Yes No If yes, please explain and provide documentation. The median household income for The City of Opa-locka is a financially disadvantaged small community. the City is $22,494, which is significantly below the State of Florida's median household income. The City has a poverty rate of over 40%. Does the ro ect include environmental habitat enhancement or nature -based solutions? If yes, please explain Does the project impact area include area that is identified as state or federal critical habitat for threatened and endangered species. If Yes, please explain. Is the project cost-effective? If Yes, please explain. The City has determined the proposed rehabilitation of the lift stations is more cost-effective than replacing each station with a newly constructed facility. The improvements proposed will harden each station, increasing reliability at a much lower cost than new construction. Tier 3 Criteria Information Is 50% local, state, or federal cost share secured for the project? X No (unless the .ro'ect is in a financial) disadvanta ed small communi ) Yes (Cost share ha s been identified but not a..ro.riated or released) Yes (Cost share has been secured) The project is in a financially disadvantaged small community and cost share is not re. uired If 50% cost share has been secured, please provide documentation with the application. ©Has state funding previously been awarded for the project? If so, for what? None Preconstruction activities other than desi:n and .ermittin If previous state funding was awarded, please explain and provide documentation. Will this project exceed Florida Building Code flood -resistant requirements and local floodplain management regulations? If Yes, please outline the specific requirements and details relating to how the design exceeds the criteria in order to receive full points. Tier 4 Criteria Information Does this project include innovative technologies designed to reduce project costs and provide regional collaboration? If yes, please specify which technologies will be used and explain why they are innovative as well as how they will reduce cost and provide regional collaboration. Does the critical asset being adapted or the project impact area contain a financially disadvantaged community? x Yes If yes, please explain the metric used to determine financial disadvantage (ex. Local income compared to state average). The City of Opa-locks is one of the most financially current conditions Bons make the completion of the projeged in the State of Florida. While the lct an ty is initiating a major redevelopment effort, the important part of long-term resiliency and economic gs 60%hleOss ver thanOthefState's average'live lnithe p project and the median household income is $22,494which. iimpact areas, the residents, according to HUD, are 78% Low- to Moderate -Income (LMI). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Will this project benefit a spring? If yes, please explain. Will this project protect water sources using alternative water supplies? If yes, please explain. Will this project construct, upgrade, or expand facilities to provide waste treatment? x Yes No The project will upgrade three wastewater lift stations that are critical to moving sewage tot e If yes, please explain. treatment facilities for treatment. The project will harden each station to ensure reliability during flooding and other natural disasters. Will this project convert septic to sewer? If yes, please explain. Does this project include green stormwater infrastructure? If yes, please explain. Has this project been submitted to other programs for funding? Yes © No If yes, please explain. What is the population of your community? 16,022 Muitiagency Information Estimated Project Duration *Permitting information once permitted. Brief description of expected permit determinations necessary for project completion or relevant permit Design and permitting are currently underway and will be completed in early 2023. The required permits for the project include: • City of Opa-locka Engineering • Miami Dade Water and Sewer Dept. (MD-WASD) • Miami Dade RER Wastewater Section *Lands, Easements, Rights of Way Brief description of acquisitions or permissions necessary for project completion or relevant information once acquired. There are no anticipated land acquisitions or approvals needed to complete the proposed improvements. Critical Infrastructure x Yes _ No Project located in a Coastal Zone? _ Yes x No SLIP Study Required? Source of Match Local Funds State Funds Federal Funds Funding Mechanism Program utilized or local funding mechanism Local Project Phase Planning X Pre -construction (design, permitting, etc.) Construction Post -construction monitoring Closed 3. PROJECT WORK PLAN Please review the RPG Project Types and Annual Priorities. If including any letters of support or other materials, they should specifically address the Work Plan. Project Summary To meet the need of these residents and the surrounding businesses, the City will rehabilitate three wastewater lift stations serving three project impact areas with 331 properties impacted. In addition to hardening the stations to provide reliable and safe sewer services to the properties, the effective operation of the facilities is critical in protecting public health and the environment. Either ex -filtration or the inability to move the wastewater to the treatment facility could lead to a public health emergency and contaminated waterways impacting habitats not only in Opa-locka but in adjacent connected waterways. Project Description As a result of the vulnerabilities each of the lift stations currently face, the City has already initiated design and engineering. The final plans are anticipated to be complete by the end of December, with permitting to follow in early 2023. The project will be ready to bid and constructed once funding is secured. The City is requesting grant funding to assist with bidding, construction, and construction management. These tasks, once started, will take approximately 12 months and are estimated to cost $1,500,000. The scope of work for the project involves upgrading each station into a more compact, submersible configuration, which includes the installation of a new wet -well, valve vault, control panel, pumps, and associated pipeline. The control panel will be elevated to comply with base flood elevation. The project will be administered by the City of Opa-Iocka through its Public Works Department. Leading the team will be the Director of Public Works & Capital Improvement Programs. The City will coordinate all aspects of the project with other personnel to provide technical assistance in procurement, reporting, inspections, and grant administration. Each member of the team will work with a group of consultants to complete the tasks needed for implementation of the project. TASKS Task 1 Task Title Pre -design or Feasibility Study Data Collection or Study Stakeholder Coordination and Planning Design and Permitting or Preconstruction Activity Project Management X Bidding and Contractor Selection (required to be included prior to construction, if project includes construction) Construction Monitoring Public Education Equipment Purchase Work Performed by: X Task Description Goal Grantee Only Contractor Only Grantee and Contractor i The City will include the preparation of the bid specification and development of the bid solicitation package in the design consultant's agreement. The consultant will work with City staff to finalize the bid solicitation package and provide assistance with pre -bid activities and technical assistance to bidders and review the bids received for completeness. Complete the bid solicitation process to select the most qualified and effective construction contractor to implement the project. Time of Completion X 1-6 Months 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Other - add time to completion 4 Select deliverables associated with each task. If your expected deliverable is not part of the field, enter into 'Other Deliverable' field X Final pre -design documents, feasibility study, or comparable certificate of completion, signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. If applicable, the Sea Level Impact Projection study report. Final report or study to include the process and methodology and any data gaps. A summary report from each workshop or meeting, including attendee feedback and outcomes, and a copy of all materials created at each workshop or meeting. Final design documents signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. If applicable, final permit documents from all appropriate state and federal regulatory agencies. Project management reports signed by the Florida -registered Professional Engineer, to include a summary of project and site inspection(s), meeting minutes, and field notes, as applicable. Public notice of advertisement for the bid, complete bid package, and written notice of selected contractor(s). Final design and Certificate of Occupancy (if applicable) and Certificate of Completion signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. Copy of completed monitoring data, surveys, and final reports for the permit -required work, and documentation of submittal to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agencies. Copy of printed material for distribution, including text and graphics, link to website material developed, and dated photograph(s) of installed materials at the project location, if applicable. Purchase order(s) and vendor invoice(s) for delivery, installation, and other necessary costs, as applicable. Copies of all appraisals, the closing statement or all closing documents, title exam/insurance, property survey, boundary map, and the deed, recorded easement, or property interest. Dated color photographs of on -going work and a signed acceptance of the completed work to date, as provided in the Grantee's Certification of Payment Request. Meeting agenda and sign -in sheets indicating location, date, and time of meeting Presentation(s) from the meeting Summary report including attendee input and meeting outcomes defining motivations, geographic context, relevant assets, and planning goals for the project Report outlining the data compiled and findings of the gap analysis A summary of recommendations to address the identified data gaps and actions taken to rectify them, if applicable GIS files with appropriate metadata of the data compiled, to include locations of critical assets owned or maintained by the county/municipality and regionally significant assets, classified as defined in s.380.093(2) 1-4, F.S. A report summarizing the areas identified as focus areas, with justification for choosing each area Tables listing each focus area with any critical assets that are contained inside the focus area Maps illustrating the location of each focus area compared to the location of all critical assets within the geographic extent of the study Final Vulnerability Assessment Report detailing the findings, including illustrations via maps and tables, based on the statutory scenarios and standards outlined in the Technical Standards Guidance A final list of critical and regionally significant assets that are impacted by flooding, prioritized by area or immediate need, specifying for each asset which flood scenario(s) it was impacted by Letter to FDEP and Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Mitigation Bureau Planning Unit, signed by the LMSWG Chair, or Designee Draft comprehensive plan coastal management element language in strike -through and underlined format that satisfies the Peril of Flood requirements in s. 163.3178(2)(f), F.S. Expense Budget Category X Contractual Services Salary/Fringe Equipment Miscellaneous/Other Expenses Land Acquisition Budget Amount: $12,000 Match Amount: $0.00 Task 2 Task Title Pre -design or Feasibility Study Data Collection or Study Stakeholder Coordination and Planning Design and Permitting or Preconstruction Activity Project Management Bidding and Contractor Selection (required to be included prior to construction, if project includes construction) X Construction Monitoring Public Education Equipment Purchase Work Performed by: Task Description The City will enter into an agreement with the contractor. Upon approval of the construction schedule and pay application format, a notice to proceed will be issued. Upon NTP, the contractor will mobilize and complete the project according to the bid specifications and according to the schedule and budget agreed upon. The contractor will also be expected to coordinate activities with the construction management consultant and provide any required documentation requested. Goal Construct effective wastewater infrastructure that will provide long-term protection from flooding. Time of Completion 1-6 Months X 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Other - add time to completion - Select deliverables associated with each task. If your expected deliverable is not part of the field, enter into 'Other Deliverable' field Final pre -design documents, feasibility study, or comparable certificate of completion, signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. If applicable, the Sea Level Impact Projection study report. Final report or study to include the process and methodology and any data gaps. A summary report from each workshop or meeting, including attendee feedback and outcomes, and a copy of all materials created at each workshop or meeting. Final design documents signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. If applicable, final permit documents from all appropriate state and federal regulatory agencies. Project management reports signed by the Florida -registered Professional Engineer, to include a summary of project and site inspection(s), meeting minutes, and field notes, as applicable. Public notice of advertisement for the bid, complete bid package, and written notice of selected contractor(s). Final design and Certificate of Occupancy (if applicable) and Certificate of Completion signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. Copy of completed monitoring data, surveys, and final reports for the permit -required work, and documentation of submittal to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agencies. Copy of printed material for distribution, including text and graphics, link to website material developed, and dated photograph(s) of installed materials at the project location, if applicable. X Purchase order(s) and vendor invoice(s) for delivery, installation, and other necessary costs, as applicable. Copies of all appraisals, the closing statement or all closing documents, title exam/insurance, property survey, boundary map, and the deed, recorded easement, or property interest. Dated color photographs of on -going work and a signed acceptance of the completed work to date, as provided in the Grantee's Certification of Payment Request. Meeting agenda and sign -in sheets indicating location, date, and time of meeting Presentation(s) from the meeting Summary report including attendee input and meeting outcomes defining motivations, Report outlining the data compiled and findings of the gap analysis A summary of recommendations to address the identified data gaps and actions taken to rectify them, if applicable GIS files with appropriate metadata of the data compiled, to include locations of critical assets owned or maintained by the county/municipality and regionally significant assets, classified as defined in s.380.093(2) 1-4, F.S. A report summarizing the areas identified as focus areas, with justification for choosing each area Tables listing each focus area with any critical assets that are contained inside the focus area Maps illustrating the location of each focus area compared to the location of all critical assets within the geographic extent of the study Final Vulnerability Assessment Report detailing the findings, including illustrations via maps and tables, based on the statutory scenarios and standards outlined in the Technical Standards Guidance A final list of critical and regionally significant assets that are impacted by flooding, prioritized by area or immediate need, specifying for each asset which flood scenario(s) it was impacted by Letter to FDEP and Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Mitigation Bureau Planning Unit, signed by the LMSWG Chair, or Designee Draft comprehensive plan coastal management element language in strike -through and underlined format that satisfies the Peril of Flood requirements in s. 163.3178(2)(f), F.S. Expense Budget Category X Contractual Services Salary/Fringe Equipment Miscellaneous/Other Expenses Land Acquisition Budget Amount: $1,400,000 Match Amount: $0.00 Task 3 Task Title Pre -design or Feasibility Study Data Collection or Study Stakeholder Coordination and Planning Design and Permitting or Preconstruction Activity x Project Management Bidding and Contractor Selection (required to be included prior to construction, if project includes construction) Construction Monitoring Public Education Equipment Purchase Work Performed by: Grantee Only x Contractor Only Grantee and Contractor Task Description Goal The City will perform project management with the assistance of a construction management consultant. It is anticipated that the consultant used for this task will be the same as in Task 1. Working with City staff, the consultant will serve as the contact with the construction contractor. Other responsibilities include reporting, including documentation of progress, inspections, financial reporting, and completion certification. Complete the project according to bid specifications while ensuring the work is done properly, safely, on time, and according to budget. Time of Completion 1-6 Months X 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Other - add time to completion - Select deliverables associated with each task. If your expected deliverable is not part of the field, enter into 'Other Deliverable' field Final pre -design documents, feasibility study, or comparable certificate of completion, signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. If applicable, the Sea Level Impact Projection study report. Final report or study to include the process and methodology and any data gaps. A summary report from each workshop or meeting, including attendee feedback and outcomes, and a copy of all materials created at each workshop or meeting. Final design documents signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. If applicable, final permit documents from all appropriate state and federal regulatory agencies. X Project management reports signed by the Florida -registered Professional Engineer, to include a summary of project and site inspection(s), meeting minutes, and field notes, as applicable. Public notice of advertisement for the bid, complete bid package, and written notice of selected contractor(s). x Final design and Certificate of Occupancy (if applicable) and Certificate of Completion signed by a Florida -registered Professional Engineer. X X Copy of completed monitoring data, surveys, and final reports for the permit -required work, and documentation of submittal to the appropriate state or federal regulatory agencies. Copy of printed material for distribution, including text and graphics, link to website material developed, and dated photograph(s) of installed materials at the project location, if applicable. Purchase order(s) and vendor invoice(s) for delivery, installation, and other necessary costs, as applicable. Copies of all appraisals, the closing statement or all closing documents, title exam/insurance, property survey, boundary map, and the deed, recorded easement, or property interest. Dated color photographs of on -going work and a signed acceptance of the completed work to date, as provided in the Grantee's Certification of Payment Request. Meeting agenda and sign -in sheets indicating location, date, and time of meeting Presentation(s) from the meeting Summary report including attendee input and meeting outcomes defining motivations, geographic context, relevant assets, and planning goals for the project Report outlining the data compiled and findings of the gap analysis A summary of recommendations to address the identified data gaps and actions taken to rectify them, if applicable GIS files with appropriate metadata of the data compiled, to include locations of critical assets owned or maintained by the county/municipality and regionally significant assets, classified as defined in s.380.093(2) 1-4, F.S. A report summarizing the areas identified as focus areas, with justification for choosing each area Tables listing each focus area with any critical assets that are contained inside the focus area Maps illustrating the location of each focus area compared to the location of all critical assets within the geographic extent of the study Final Vulnerability Assessment Report detailing the findings, including illustrations via maps and tables, based on the statutory scenarios and standards outlined in the Technical Standards Guidance A final list of critical and regionally significant assets that are impacted by flooding, prioritized by area or immediate need, specifying for each asset which flood scenario(s) it was impacted by Letter to FDEP and Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Mitigation Bureau Planning Unit, signed by the LMSWG Chair, or Designee Draft comprehensive plan coastal management element language in strike -through and underlined format that satisfies the Peril of Flood requirements in s. 163.3178(2)(f), F.S. Expense Budget Category X Contractual Services Salary/Fringe Equipment Miscellaneous/Other Expenses Land Acquisition Budget Amount: $88,000 Match Amount: $0.00 •� An official wabsite of the United States govemment United States' Census QuickFacts Opa-Iocka city, Florida QuickFacts provides statistics for all states and counties, and for cities and towns with a population of 5,000 or more. Table II Topics Total employment, percent change, 2019-2020 Opa-Iocka city, Florida X 1 PEOPLE Population Population Estimates, July 1 2021, (V2021) Population estimates base, April 1, 2020, (V2021) Population, percent change - April 1, 2020 (estimates base) to July 1, 2021, (V2021) Population, Census, April 1, 2020 Population, Census, April 1, 2010 Age and Sex Persons under 5 years, percent Persons under 18 years, percent Persons 65 years and over, percent Female persons, percent Race and Hispanic Origin White alone, percent Black or African American alone, percent American Indian and Alaska Native alone, percent Asian alone, percent i. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent , Two or More Races, percent Hispanic or Latino, percent White alone, not Hispanic or Latino, percent Population Characteristics Veterans, 2016-2020 Foreign born persons, percent, 2016-2020 34.0% Housing Housing units, July 1, 2021, (V2021) X Owner -occupied housing unit rate, 2016-2020 31.4% Median value of owner -occupied housing units, 2016-2020 $169,900 Median selected monthly owner costs -with a mortgage, 2016-2020 51,349 Median selected monthly owner costs -without a mortgage, 2016-2020 $361 Median gross rent, 2016-2020 $894 Building permits, 2021 X © 16,022 © 16,454 6 -2.6% 16,463 15,219 8 9.0% 6 27.4% 6 12.8% 8 49.5% 32.4% D 58.5% © 0.0% rtt 0.1% 6 0.0% 8 5.3% © 40.9% 6 3.5% 415 Families & Living Arrangements Households, 2016-2020 5,534 Persons per household, 2016-2020 2.88 Living in same house 1 year ago, percent of persons age 1 year+, 2016-2020 88A% Language other than English spoken at home, percent of persons age 5 years+, 2016-2020 47.3% Computer and Internet Use Households with a computer, percent, 2016-2020 81 9 Households with a broadband Internet subscription, percent, 2016-2020 59.5% Education High school graduate or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2016-2020 68.0% Bachelor's degree or higher, percent of persons age 25 years+, 2016-2020 8.7% Health With a disability, under age 65 years, percent, 2016-2020 8.7% Persons without health insurance, under age 65 years, percent 6 22.1% Economy In civilian labor force, total, percent of population age 16 years+, 2016-2020 53.8% In civilian labor force, female, percent of population age 16 years+, 2016-2020 45.6% Total accommodation and food services sales, 2017 ($1,000) Total health care and social assistance receipts/revenue, 2017 ($1,000) 14,552 Total transportation and warehousing receipts/revenue, 2017 ($1,000) 169,291 Total retail sales, 2017 ($1,000) 108,391 Total retail sales per capita, 2017 $6,686 Transportation 26.8 Mean travel time to work (minutes), workers age 16 years+, 2016-2020 Income & Poverty Median household income (in 2020 dollars), 2016-2020 Per capita income in past 12 months (in 2020 dollars), 2016-2020 Persons In poverty, percent Buelneeses Total employer establishments, 2020 Total employment, 2020 Total annual payroll, 2020 ($1,000) Total employment, percent change, 2019-2020 Total nonemployer establishments, 2019 All employer firms, Reference year 2017 Men -owned employer fines, Reference year 2017 Women -owned employer firms, Reference year 2017 Minority -owned employer fines, Reference year 2017 Nonminoftyowned employer fines, Reference year 2017 Veteran -owned employer fines, Reference year 2017 Nonveteran-owned employer firms, Reference year 2017 Geography Population per square mile, 2020 Population per square mile, 2010 Land area in square miles, 2020 Land area in square miles, 2010 FIPS Code $22,494 $14,946 ® 40.4% X X X X X 494 308 56 272 182 s 409 3,821.5 3,535.8 4.31 4.30 1251650 ut du in thI table Value Notes 6 Estimates are not comparable to other geographic levels due to methodology differences that may exist between different data sources. est s pre nted m Some TABLE to team here come ling sample data, and thus have sampling errors that may render some apparent differences between geographies statistically indistinguishable. Click the Quick Info raw in TABLE view is team about sampling error. The vintage year (e.g., V2021) refers to the final year of the series (2020 thru 2021). Different vintage years of estimates are not comparable. i,'b icon to the left of each Users should exercise caution when comparing 2016-2020 ACS 5 -year estimates to other ACS estimates. For more information, please visit the M15 -year ACS Comparison Gui page. Fact Notes (a) Includes persons reporting only one race (c) Economic Census - Puerto Rico data are not comparable to U.S. Economic Census data (b) Hispanics may be of any race, so also are included in applicable race categories Value Flags • Either no or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest or upper interval of an open ended distribution. F Fewer than 25 firms D Suppressed to avoid disclosure of confidential information N Data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. FN Footnote on this item in place of data X Not applicable S Suppressed; does not meet publication standards NA Not available Z Value greater than zero but less than half unit of measure shown QuickFacts data are derived from: Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, Current Population Survey, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Pattems, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Perils. CONNECT WITH US © Oy in OO Q Accessibility Information Quality FOIA 1 Data Protection and Privacy Policy 1 U.S. Department of Commerce C: • • • • • •• • • \• • • • \• •• • • . .51 NW_151it ST_ • • •••• • • • f • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • •••• •• • • • • • • ••• ••• • • ••• • ••• • •• • • • • • • N -+ • • • • • I\ • • • Ni S • • • •• ••• I m SANITARY SEWER Basin #9 Basin Limits • Properties (213) ,80. ,, , ri 7 ! Nw 47th A. NW 32nd AVE _ BAV Pun" 1 • • 3M PUZP'MN N ca m • • NW 11th AVE NW 19th AVE to,. NW 22nd AVE df _ . 3AV wet MN m 5 NW 32nd AVE cAbb —00 ` l\_3AV PULP MN ._ �/ 5Q L 0 0 • • 'b �T-'�i"e,• eIrA 3AYl'PuZ9'MN W Ayr: • • • • • • • • • • • • • 'ex': q.. *d 111 h. MN 0 • .• • • • • • =a v 19 9-t No • • SANITARY SEWER CD C 0 (0 z ."-r44