HomeMy Public PortalAbout09 September 2, 1992 Budget & Finance053'7'75
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET & FINANCE COMMITTEE
(COMMISSIONERS RUSS BEIRICH, KAY CENICEROS,
CORKY LARSON, PAT MURPHY)
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1992
10:30 A.M.
LUND & GUTTRY
39-700 BOB HOPE DRIVE, THE BOB HOPE BUILDING, SUITE 309
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
4. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
4A. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH CALTRANS FOR PROJECT COST AND SCHEDULE
SERVICES
Overview
During the 1992 fiscal year, RCTC staff assisted Ca'trans with scheduling of Riverside
County projects in order to better assess the Ca[trans resource requirements relative to
the Measure A highway projects. Ca'trans has requested additional cost and schedule
support for the 1993 fiscal year. Ca'trans has indicated that RCTC will be fully
compensated for this assistance. Staff has been working on an agreement with Ca!trans
outlining the terrns of these services and expect the agreement to be brought forward for
RCTC review this month. A draft agreement will be presented to the Administrative
Committee for review.
Staff Recommendation:
That the Commission approve the draft agreement for RCTC to provide project cost and
schedule services to Caltrans for the 1993 fiscal year in the amount of $320,000.
,ge 2
..dget & Finance Committee Agenda
September 2, 1992
4B. KAWES CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AMENDMENT
Overview
The Route 91 Median Widening Project, from the Orange County Line to Main Street in
the City of Corona, started construction in July of 1991. It is currently on schedule and
is expected to be complete by June of 1993. The Commission had previously approved
an amendment to KaWES's contract in March of 1991 for $150,000. There have been
several problem areas that have surfaced during project construction that required
additional engineering effort not foreseen in the original estimate. The details of the
contract amendment are outlined in the staff memorandum.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract RO-9002 in the amount of
$60,000 for technical support of construction activities on the Route 91, OCL to Main
Street, Measure A Highway Improvement Project. Amendment to be reviewed by Legal
Counsel prior to approval.
4C. AMENDMENT 3 TO PBQ&D CONTRACT
Overview
Recently, management direction has both delayed and changed the scope of the HOV
lane addition for Interstate 215 from the east junction with State Route 60 north to
Interstate 10. The result of these changes is that additional alternatives will now have to
be studies, the project limits have increased on the east, west, and south in order to
properly tie into adjacent projects, the environmental study for the Ultimate alternative will
be rescoped as a Tier 1 study, and the preferred alternative will be a full standard HOV
addition (one lane in each direction) throughout the project limits.
Staff Recommendation
Staff and Legal Counsel are still reviewing the scope of the amendment as well as
reviewing the impact that this change will have on the current MOU with SANBAG. The
final format for Amendment 3 to the PBO&D contract and the proposed change to the
MOU with SANBAG will be presented at the Administrative committee meeting.
4D. CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 3 FOR AGREEMENT RO-9101 WITH GREINER, INC.,
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND FINAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE ROUTE 91 MEDIAN
WIDENING PROJECT, FROM MAGNOLIA AVENUE TO MARY STREET
Overview
Greiner is requesting an amendment to Agreement No. RO-9101 for compensation due
to the addition of extra scope of work to the original milestones set forth in Amendment
Number Two, for the PS&E work task. This additional work scope is a result of several
situations that have occurred since the approval of amendment number two.
nlge 3
dget & Finance Committee Agenda
oeptember 2, 1992
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission approve the contract Amendment No. 3 to Agreement RO-9101 in
the amount of $225,260.92.
4E. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR THE FOLLOWING MEASURE A HIGHWAY
IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: 1) ROUTE 79, FROM GILMAN SPRING ROAD TO FIRST
STREET IN THE CITY OF BEAUMONT, AND 2) ROUTE 79. FROM KELLER ROAD TO
NEWPORT ROAD
Overview
The Measure A plan calls for improvements on Route 79 for the two projects referenced
in the staff memorandum. Normally, Cooperative Agreements are entered into at the onset
of preliminary engineering for the project. Because of the difficulty in reaching agreement
on the exact wording for one of the first Cooperative Agreements initiated for the 1-215
Measure A projects, and to keep that project and all other Measure A projects moving
towards completion of preliminary engineering and environmental clearance, the project
development process was initiated by RCTC on many projects without resolution of the
Cooperative Agreement language. The Cooperative Agreements for Route 79 were
patterned after the wording of the 1-215 Agreement on which RCTC and Caltrans have
reached resolution.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission approve the Route 79 Cooperative Agreements to be entered into
by Caltrans and RCTC for the following projects: (1) Project Development and Final
Design PS&E for the Route 79 Measure A Improvement Project, from Gilman Spring Road
(PM 33.9) to First Street (PM 40.1) in the City of Beaumont; and (2) Project Development
and Right -of -Way Engineering for the Route 79 Measure A Improvement Project, from
Keller Road (PM 10.9) to Newport Road (PM 15.2).
4F. CAJALCO CORRIDOR STUDY- INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED CONTRACT AMOUNT FOR P&D
TECHNOLOGIES
Overview
RCTC staff has reviewed P&D Technologies request for an additional increase in their
authorized contract amount for the Cajalco Corridor Study (Phase II). In addition, P&D
Technologies requested payment for their attendance at a presentation in March to brief
a Commissioner and staff on the overall status of the Cajalco Corridor study.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission approve P&D Technologies' final request for funding in the amount
of $11,408.85 which will end the Commission's current participation in the Cajalco
Corridor study.
Page 4
alidget & Finance Committee Agenda
ptember 2, 1992
5. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE.
5A. MEASURE A COMMUTER BICYCLING DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
Overview
The Riverside Bicycle Commuter Coalition (RBCC) submitted a FY91 /92 Congestion
Management and Air Quality (CMAO) proposal to promote bicycling as a safe and viable
commuting alternative. While the proposal was not funded under the CMAO process,
staff has evaluated its merits and application to the Measure A Commuter Assistance
Program. The RBCC Board has indicated its willingness to enter into an agreement with
the Commission to develop and implement a demonstration program. Staff has identified
those tasks of the CMAQ proposal most consistent with the overall Measure A Program.
The goal of the demonstration effort is to determine its effectiveness in shifting local work
related trips from the automobile to the bicycle.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission: 1) Direct staff to negotiate and finalize an agreement with the
Riverside Bicycle Commuter Coalition, pursuant to the attached CMAQ proposal, for the
development and implementation of a Commuter Bicycling Demonstration Program; 2)
Approve the agreement as negotiated by staff, subject to legal counsel review, and
authorize the Executive Director to execute, on behalf of the Commission, said agreement
with RBCC; and 3) Approve the expenditure of Measure A Commuter Assistance funds
in an amount not to exceed $160,000 for the bicycle commuter program for the period
September '92 through June '93.
5B. MEASURE A LEASE PARK-N-RIDE PROGRAM
Overview
The Commission has contracted with Inland Transportation Services (ITS) for the past two
years to negotiate and manage park-n-ride lease agreements with private property
owners. Seven lots totalling 435 spaces have been negotiated. Consultant services
continue to be required on an as needed basis to secure and renew leases, and market
lots to increase commuter use. Based on performance and program continuity, the ITS
agreement is proposed to be extended for a third year.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission: (1) Approve, pursuant to the attached proposal and subject to
Legal Counsel review, amendment of the existing contract for lease park-n-ride services
with Inland Transportation Services at hourly rates of $65/Project Manager and
$45/Marketing Specialist; (2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the amended
agreement on behalf of the Commission, and; (3) Allocate Measure A highway funds in
an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the period August 15, 1992 to August 15, 1993.
g e 5
J d g e t & F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e A g e n d a
S e p t e m b e r 2 , 1 9 9 2
6 . C O M M U T E R R A I L
6 A . V A L U E E N G I N E E R I N G R E V I E W O F D O W N T O W N C O M M U T E R R A I L S T A T I O N
O v e r v i e w
R C T C , B e c h t e l , a n d S C R R A s t a f f a r e p e r f o r m i n g a v a l u e e n g i n e e r i n g r e v i e w o f t h e d e s i g n
f o r t h e d o w n t o w n c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n . I t i s e x p e c t e d t h a t t h e r e v i e w w i l l b e c o m p l e t e
a n d a r e p o r t w i l l b e m a d e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n . S e v e r a l c o s t s a v i n g o p t i o n s w i l l b e
p r e s e n t e d .
S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e t h e r e p o r t a n d p r o v i d e d i r e c t i o n o n c o s t s a v i n g o p t i o n s t o
b e i m p l e m e n t e d .
6 B . P L A N N I N G , E N V I R O N M E N T A L , A N D E N G I N E E R I N G D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T C O N T R A C T
F O R C O M M U T E R R A I L S T A T I O N A T L I M O N I T E A V E N U E A N D P E D L E Y R O A D
O v e r v i e w
T h e s e c o n d c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n o n t h e U n i o n P a c i f i c l i n e f r o m R i v e r s i d e t o L o s A n g e l e s
i s p r o p o s e d t o b e l o c a t e d o n 4 . 6 A c r e s o f p r o p e r t y c u r r e n t l y o w n e d b y U n i o n P a c i f i c n e a r
t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n o f L i m o n i t e A v e n u e a n d P e d l e y R o a d i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . R C T C r e c e n t l y
c o m p l e t e d a s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s t o r a n k c o n s u l t a n t s t o c o m p l e t e s i t e p l a n n i n g ;
e n v i r o n m e n t a l s t u d y a n d c l e a r a n c e ; a n d p r e p a r a t i o n o f p l a n s , s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d
e s t i m a t e s f o r c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n s i n t h e M e t r o l i n k s y s t e m . T h e t o p r a n k e d f i r m i n t h e
s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s w a s P o u n t n e y a n d A s s o c i a t e s .
S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e t h e c o n t r a c t w i t h P o u n t n e y a n d A s s o c i a t e s f o r c o m p l e t i o n
o f p l a n n i n g , e n v i r o n m e n t a l , a n d d e s i g n s e r v i c e s f o r t h e p r o p o s e d U m o n i t e - P e d l e y
c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n . T h e c u r r e n t l y p r o p o s e d c o n s u l t a n t c o s t i s $ 2 4 4 , 4 3 4 . 0 0 f o r a l l t h r e e
p h a s e s . S t a f f w i l l p r e s e n t a f i n a l p r o p o s e d c o s t a t t h e B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
m e e t i n g . S t a f f a l s o r e c o m m e n d s t h a t a 1 5 % c o n t i n g e n c y f u n d b e e s t a b l i s h e d f o r e x t r a
w o r k t o b e a u t h o r i z e d b y t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r . T h e c u r r e n t l y p r o p o s e d t o t a l w o r k
a u t h o r i z a t i o n b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n c l u d i n g t h e 1 5 % e x t r a w o r k f u n d w o u l d b e $ 2 8 1 , 0 0 0 .
6 C . A D D I T I O N O F P S O M A S T A S K S 1 1 & 1 2 T O D E V E L O P S T A N D A R D S A N D P R E P A R E A R A I L
G E O G R A P H I C I N F O R M A T I O N S Y S T E M F O R R C T C
O v e r v i e w
P s o m a s & A s s o c i a t e s i s c u r r e n t l y p r o v i d i n g t h e p r i m a r y s u r v e y c o n t r o l f o r R C T C . T o
m a n a g e t h e s u r v e y c o n t r o l i n f o r m a t i o n a s w e l l a s a l l o f t h e s u r v e y a n d m a p p i n g
page 6
iget & Finance Committee Agenda
September 2, 1992
information that is being prepared by all of the survey Consultants currently working for
the Commission, Psomas developed a Survey Records Database. Since all of the
information relating to surveying is geographical in nature, a Geographic Information
System (GIS) was used. The GIS system utilized Intergraph graphics and an Oracle
database. The system allows the operator to point to a graphical image/map on the
screen and bring up the information associated with the object. The result was a very
powerful tool to simplify the management of a very complex package of information. When
the Rail negotiations are finalized, the Commission will again be faced with dealing with
a large amount of Rail information that will lend itself to being managed by a GIS system.
The GIS system can be designed to keep track of and administer legal agreements and
documents associated with each parcel, as well as maps, utility information, and any
other pertinent data.
Staff Recommendation
The actual scope of work and cost to add the two tasks outlined in the staff memorandum
to the existing Psomas contract will be presented at the Administration meeting. The
details of the agreement are currently being reviewed by staff and Legal Counsel.
7. GENERAL ITEMS.
7A. STATE BUDGET IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
Overview
There have been several Legislative proposals for the State Budget to use transportation
revenues to reduce the State deficit. The most significant is to use 20% of the
Transportation Development Act (TDA) which is returned to all counties for transit and
may also be used under specified condition for local streets and roads purposes in most
counties including Riverside County. The Commission staff and Legislative Advocates
have been monitoring and these proposals and advising our Legislators of our concerns
along with other Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPA's) throughout the
state. A report will be presented at the Commission meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Discussion and possible action.
7B. PRESENTATION BY SMITH BARNEY.
Overview
Representatives from Smith Barney will be present at the Commission meeting to make
a presentation and discuss a possible interest rate swap.
Staff Recommendation
Discussion and possible action.
Page 7
Rudget & Finance Committee Agenda
ptember 2, 1992
7C. QUARTERLY COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT
Overview
Attached are Combining Statements of Revenues and Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances (Unaudited) for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1992. Also, attached are the RCTC
Measure A Highway Projects Budget Report by Route, Contract Commitment, Contract
Amendments, DBE/MBE Utilization Report, and the Contract Status Report through June
30, 1992 prepared by Bechtel Civil, Inc.
Staff Recommendation
Receive and file.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
AUGUST 5, 1992
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The meeting of the Budget and Finance Committee was called to order by
Commissioner Russell Beirich at 10:39 a.m., 39-700 Bob Hope Drive, Suite 309,
Rancho Mirage, California.
Commissioners present:
Russell Beirich
Kay Ceniceros
Corky Larson
Pat Murphy
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
There were no public comments.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
M/S/C to approve the minutes of the July 1,1992 meeting as submitted.
4. GENERAL ITEMS.
4A. UCR INLAND EMPIRE BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DATA BANK AND
FORECASTING CENTER.
M/S/C that the Commission authorize the Executive Director to
contribute $5,000 to the UCR Inland Empire Business and
Economic Data Bank and Forecasting Center for Fiscal Year
1992/93.
4B. CONTRACT REVISION FOR D.J. SMITH & ASSOCIATES.
The Committee members reviewed the proposed contract revision for D.J.
Smith & Associates. After conferring with staff, the proposed contract was
amended as follows: 1) Legislative Services $45,000; 2) Project Advocacy
Services $36,000; 3) Clean Fuel Locomotive/SCRRA $25,000; and, 4) Travel
and Expenses $4,000 - a total contract of $108,200.
RCTC Budget and Finance Committee
Meeting of August 5, 1992
Page 2
M/S/C that the Commission approve the following revised budget
for D.J. Smith & Associates for FY 1992-93: 1) Legislative
Services $45,000; 2) Project Advocacy Services $36,000; 3) Clean
Fuel Locomotive/SCRRA $25,000; and, 4) Travel and Expenses
$4,000 -- for a total contract revision amount of $108,200.
4C. GENERAL AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.
M/S/C that the Commission: 1) authorize the Executive Director
to purchase the general liability coverage as presented in the
staff memo in an amount not to exceed $75,000; 2) attempt to
augment its existing program with a purchased policy intended
to cover the Commission for project losses which exceed
$5,000,000. Authorize the Executive Director to obtain policy
quotes for insurance of this type; and, 3) authorize the Executive
Director to enlist the support of the various transportation
commissions to pursue legislation which would specifically
exempt transportation commissions from project liability.
4D. CAR ALLOWANCES AND STAFF CARS.
M/S/C that the Commission: 1) approve a car allowance
program which provides compensation in the amount of $300 per
month to Assistant Directors who travel more than 5,000 miles
per year; and, 2) authorize the Executive Director to purchase
two vehicles for an amount not to exceed $35,000.
4E. COST AND SCHEDULE REPORTS FOR THE MONTH OF JULY.
M/S/C that the Commission receive and file.
5. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
5A. APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL LOAN FUNDS TO THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE FOR COMPLETION OF 1-15 CORRIDOR ANALYSIS.
M/S/C that the Commission: 1) approve additional loan funds of
$11,980 to Riverside County for completion of the 1-15 Corridor
Analysis and Project Study Report for a new interchange; and,
2) direct staff to revise the Memorandum of Understanding to
reflect the additional loan funds under the same terms.
RCTC Budget and Finance Committee
Meeting of August 5, 1992
Page 3
5B. APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT CONTRACT WITH HOLMES & NARVER
FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
FOR THE ROUTE 91, ORANGE COUNTY LINE TO MAIN STREET, HOV
MEDIAN WIDENING MEASURE A HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
After review of the proposed equipment and cost, it was determined by the
Committee members the size and cost of the vehicles be downsized.
M/S/C that the Commission approve a Consultant Service
Contract with Holmes & Narver for Construction Support
Services with a budget amount of $372,659 for the base contract
amount, and $102,341 for the extra work. Also, approve an
additional budget of $62,000 for the purchase of five medium
pick-up trucks to be used by Holmes & Narver during the lift of
this contract and then returned to the Commission. The total
contract value is $537,000.
6. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE.
6A. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY REQUEST FOR FY 1992-93 State
Transportation Assistance Funds.
M/S/C that an allocation of an estimated $1,250,000 in FY 1992-
93 STAF Apportionment for Riverside County be made to the
SunLine Transit Agency to be used for their CNG Project.
6B. MEASURE A FUNDING REQUEST FROM RIVERSIDE GENERAL HOSPITAL.
M/S/C that the Commission allocated $70,122 in Measure A
Specialized Transit funds for Riverside General Hospital's
Transportation Program.
6C. MEASURE A FUNDING REQUEST FROM FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION
OF WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY.
M/S/C that the Commission allocate an additional $57,500 in
Measure A Specialized Transit funds for Family Services
Association of Western Riverside County Transportation Program
and waive the 50% maintenance of effort on operating funds for
the 1992-93 fiscal year.
RCTC Budget and Finance Committee
Meeting of August 5, 1992
Page 4
7. COMMUTER RAIL
7A. FY 1991-92 TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT
FUNDS.
M/S/C that the Commission approve the use of the remaining
unobligated balance of FY 1991-92 TCI grant funds for the
purchase of additional rail passenger cars under the SCRRA
Bombadier/UTDC procurement. This results in a commitment of
$1.655 million of TCI and $1.655 million of Measure A funds.
7B. FY 1992-94 TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT (TCI) PROGRAM
APPLICATION.
M/S/C that the Commission authorize resubmission of the
unfunded balance of the Downtown Riverside Commuter Rail
Station for consideration in the FY 1993-94 TCI program.
7C. RADER RAIL CAR.
M/S/C that the Commission not procure used commuter rail cars
from Rader Rail Car.
7D. RIVERSIDE STATION COMMUTER RAIL PLATFORM - APPROVAL OF
CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE FOR BIDDING AND REVIEW OF DESIGN OF
THE DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION.
M/S/C that the Commission approve the design package for the
Downtown Commuter Rail Platform to be released for bids and
award to be made to the lowest responsible bidder. The
Commission should review and give direction for inclusion of
any desired architectural enhancements to the station.
7E. MODIFICATION OF SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR SCHIERMEYER
CONSULTING SERVICES.
M/S/C that the Commission approve an additional $10,000 for
SCS to perform this business outreach service on behalf of
RCTC.
RCTC Budget and Finance Committee
Meeting of August 5, 1992
Page 5
7F. PROMOTIONAL TRIP ON UNION PACIFIC.
M/S/C that the Commission endorse and direct staff to make
arrangements for a Union Pacific promotional trip in either
September or October.
8. URGENCY ITEMS.
M/S/C to add the following agenda items as urgency items. The items
arose after the agenda was mailed out.
8A. BUDGET REVISION FOR VALLEY RESEARCH AND PLANNING.
M/S/C that the Commission authorize the Executive
Director to transfer $7,205.30 from the 92/93 budget of
Valley Research and Planning to the 91/92 budget, for a
total 91/92 budget of $67,205.30 and a 92/93 budget of
$52,794.70.
8B. CONTRACT WITH DOUG AUSLANDER FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY
SERVICES.
Jack Reagan informed the Committee members that Doug
Auslander, previously with Kemper Securities, has recently accepted
employment with Smith, Barney, Harris Upham & Company. RCTC's
contract with Kemper Securities contained a provision which required
the services of Doug Auslander as key personnel. If the Commission
elected to retain Doug in the role of financial advisor, the contract
with Kemper would have to be terminated, and a contract with Smith
Barney executed. Execution of a contract with Smith Barney for
financial advisory services would require their not serving as an
underwriter for the Commission's bonds.
M/S/C that the Commission authorize the Executive
Director to terminate the contract with Kemper Securities
for financial advisory services, and to execute a contract
with Doug Auslander in an amount not to exceed $10,000
for 90 days, with a 30-day extension clause if needed.
RCTC Budget and Finance Committee
Meeting of August 5, 1992
Page 5
9. ADJOURNMENT.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Naty K p nha �r
Office Services Manager
AGENDA ITEM /MA
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
FROM: Louie Martin, Project Controls Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans for Project Cost and
Schedule Services
During the 1992 fiscal year, RCTC staff assisted Caltrans with scheduling of Riverside
County project in order to better assess the Caltrans resource requirements relative
to the Measure A highway projects. Caltrans has requested additional cost and
schedule support for the 1993 fiscal year. Caltrans has indicated that RCTC will be
fully compensated for this assistance. Staff has been working on an agreement with
Caltrans outlining the terms of these services and expect the agreement to be brought
forward for RCTC review this month. A draft agreement will be presented to the
Administrative Committee for review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission approve the draft agreement for RCTC to provide project cost
and schedule services to Caltrans for the 1993 fiscal year in the amount of $320,000.
LM:sc
AGENDA ITEM #4B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
FROM: Karl Sauer, Measure A Project Coordinator
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Contract Amendment No. 2 for Agreement No. RO-9002 with KaWES
and Associates, for Construction Support Services.
The Route 91 Median Widening Project, from the Orange County Line to Main Street
in the City of Corona, started construction in July of 1991. It is currently on schedule
and is expected to be complete by June of 1993. The Commission had previously
approved an amendment to KaWES's contract in March of 1991 (#5B1) for $150,000
to provide technical support for the following activities:
1, Response to Office Engineer questions related to PS&E approval to
advertise.
2. Responding to technical questions from prospective bidders during the
bidding phase.
3. Engineering support for design changes that may occur during project
construction.
4. Compilation of "As -Built" information for inclusion in the project plans
upon /project completion.
As of the last billing period $22,458 has been expended on activities #1 & #2, and
$104,248 has been expended on activity #3, totaling $126,706. This leaves $23,294
to complete activities #3 & #4 for the remainder of the project. The above budget was
only an estimate. There have been several problem areas that have surfaced during
project construction that required additional engineering effort not foreseen in the
original estimate. The following is a tabulation of these problem areas:
1. Provided Engineering Construction Support for the Ramp Metering
Project ($15,000).
2. Major Rework of the West Prado Over Head by Dokken Engineering to
conform to new guidelines required by Caltrans ($30,000).
Page Two
September 2, 1992
Contract Amendment No. 2 for Agreement No. RO-9002 with KaWES and Associates,
for Construction Support Services.
3. Prepare grid grade calculations and cross -sections for Auxiliary lane and
North East Connector, previously not required ($15,000)
4, Revised profile grade drawings for the project and all other affected
drawings, requested by Caltrans to assure a smooth roadway profile
($45,000).
Staff has requested that KaWES submit a proposed budget amendment to augment
the remainder of the current budget to cover technical support by KaWES for the
remainder of the project. Amendment No. 2 to Contract RO-9002 is attached and
proposes an additional $60,000 be approved to augment the remaining $23,294 to
cover technical support services, Activity #3, for the remainder of the project. The
scope of services for Activity #4, As -Built Drawings, will be deleted from KaWES's
contract but will be revisited at project conclusion when more information is available.
Legal counsel will review the amendment prior to approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract RO-9002 in the amount
of $60,000 for technical support of construction activities on the Route 91, OCL to
Main Street, Measure A Highway Improvement Project. Amendment to be reviewed
by Legal Counsel prior to approval.
KS:sc
AGENDA ITEM #4C
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Amendment 3 to PBQ&D Contract
RCTC signed an MOU with SANBAG (R09020) in December of 1990 to be the lead
agency for the portion of the Interstate 215 improvement that occurs in San
Bernardino County south of Interstate 10. RCTC negotiated and signed a contract
with PBQ&D (R09018) in August of 1990 to provide preliminary engineering and
environmental documents for an HOV lane addition to 1215 for Interstate 215 from
the East junction with State Route 60 north to Interstate 10. The contract was
amended in December of 1990 to include the evaluation of the Ultimate alternative
and to provide full environmental clearance for the Ultimate Project. PBQ&D will
provide preliminary engineering and environmental studies to support the PSR, PR and
EIR/EIS documents for the Interstate 215 improvements.
Recently, management direction has both delayed and changed the scope of the
project. The result of these changes is that additional alternatives will now have to
be studied, the project limits have been increased on the East, West and South in
order to properly tie into adjacent projects, the environmental study for the Ultimate
alternative will be rescoped as a Tier I study, and the preferred alternative will be a
full standard HOV addition (one lane in each direction) throughout the project limits.
Scoping discussions are currently being conducted with Caltrans to determine the
timing and staging of the improvements so that improvements can be delivered at an
early date if possible in key sections such as between the East and West Junctions
with State Route 60. Where possible, the Measure alternative of providing a reduced
standard HOV addition will be maintained as an initial stage to a full standard facility
that will be added or improved upon at a future date.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff and Legal Counsel are still reviewing the scope of the amendment as well as
reviewing the impact that this change will have on the current MOU with SANBAG.
The final format for Amendment 3 to the PBQ&D contract and the proposed change
to the MOU with SANBAG will be presented at the Administrative committee meeting.
WRH:sc
AGENDA ITEM #4D
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
FROM: Keith Fullenwider, Project Coordinator
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Contract Amendment No. 3 for Agreement RO-9101 with Greiner, Inc.,
Preliminary Engineering and Final Design Services for the Route 91
Median Widening Project, from Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street
In February of 1992, the Commission approved Amendment Number Two to the
Contract Agreement, which, in part, directed Greiner and their subconsultant J.F.
Davidson to perform final design (PS&E) services for the State Route 91 Magnolia
Avenue to Mary Street median widening (HOV) project.
At this time, Greiner is requesting an amendment to the agreement, for compensation
due to the addition of extra scope of work to the original milestones set forth in
Amendment Number Two, for the PS&E work task. This additional work scope is a
result of several situations that have occurred since the approval of amendment
number two:
1. Caltrans has required that all final design submittals after September 1, 1992
incorporate the latest design specifications. The SR 91 (HOV) project final design is
scheduled for submittal in early November, therefore some of the previous work
completed on the specification documents will have to be revised to comply with the
Caltrans' requirement.
2. Numerous design changes, initiated by the Caltrans review process, have
necessitated additional manhours to add or delete design elements of the original
project concept.
3. Also, due to the compression of the original project schedule duration, the
consultants have had to work overtime hours to meet several key schedule milestone
dates, resulting in extra labor costs not factored into the original budget.
4. In addition, Caltrans has been working on a fiber-optic project along the SR 91
freeway, from the 60/91 /215 interchange to the Orange County line. They have
requested that RCTC incorporate some of the initial design features of their project
into the RCTC median widening final design drawings. This would allow a conduit,
that will ultimately contain a fiber-optic cable, to be
Page Two
September 2, 1992
Contract Amendment No. 3 for Agreement RO-9101 with Greiner, Inc., Preliminary
Engineering and Final Design Services for the Route 91 Median Widening Project, from
Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street
constructed in the SR 91 freeway median at the same time the construction of the
HOV lanes and drainage facilities are being done. This would result in a considerable
savings in construction costs and traffic impacts. The construction costs for this
conduit will be paid by Caltrans, as a separate bid item of the final design package.
The cost to RCTC for the inclusion of the Caltrans fiber-optic conduit design into the
PS&E package is $8,530.93.
5. The scope of work for amendment number two outlined a need for eventual
construction phase engineering support, but at that time a budget was not requested
of Greiner. At this time, Greiner was directed to provide a cost estimate for these
construction services, as part of the amendment number three scope of work.
Staff has reviewed the scope of work and cost proposals for the five work tasks as
outlined above. The final draft of the amendment number three is available for review
from RCTC staff.
Staff recommends that RCTC approve Amendment No. 3 to the contract with Greiner,
Inc. in the amount of $225,260.92. The remaining contract agreement extra work
authorizations are unaffected by this action and remain available for use through the
remainder of the contract duration.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission approve the contract Amendment No. 3 to Agreement RO-9101
in the amount of $225,260.92.
KF:sc
i
AGENDA ITEM #4E
�� ] R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : S e p t e m b e r 2 , 1 9 9 2
T O : B u d g e t & F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : K a r l S a u e r , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t C o o r d i n a t o r
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t s f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g M e a s u r e A H i g h w a y
I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s :
1 ) R o u t e 7 9 , f r o m G i l m a n s S p r i n g R o a d t o F i r s t S t r e e t i n
t h e C i t y o f B e a u m o n t .
2 ) R o u t e 7 9 , f r o m K e l l e r R o a d t o N e w p o r t R o a d .
T h e M e a s u r e A p l a n c a l l s f o r i m p r o v e m e n t s o n R o u t e 7 9 f o r t h e t w o p r o j e c t s
r e f e r e n c e d a b o v e . N o r m a l l y , C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t s a r e e n t e r e d i n t o a t t h e o n s e t o f
p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g f o r t h e p r o j e c t . B e c a u s e o f t h e d i f f i c u l t y i n r e a c h i n g a g r e e m e n t
o n t h e e x a c t w o r d i n g f o r o n e o f t h e f i r s t C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t s i n i t i a t e d f o r t h e I -
2 1 5 M e a s u r e A p r o j e c t s , a n d t o k e e p t h a t p r o j e c t a n d a l l o t h e r M e a s u r e A p r o j e c t s
m o v i n g t o w a r d s c o m p l e t i o n o f p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l c l e a r a n c e ,
t h e p r o j e c t d e v e l o p m e n t p r o c e s s w a s i n i t i a t e d b y R C T C o n m a n y p r o j e c t s w i t h o u t
r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t l a n g u a g e .
F o r R o u t e 7 9 , t h i s a l l o w e d t h e a p p r o v a l o f c o n t r a c t s w i t h D a m e s & M o o r e , C e n t e n n i a l
a n d K o r v e t o c o m p l e t e t h e n e c e s s a r y e n g i n e e r i n g , e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d t r a f f i c s t u d i e s
r e q u i r e d t o c o m p l e t e t h e p r e l i m i n a r y e n g i n e e r i n g a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r t h e
p r o j e c t s . C o n t r a c t s w e r e a l s o a p p r o v e d w i t h G r e i n e r a n d C o n v e r s e f o r F i n a l P S & E
D e s i g n S e r v i c e s , R i g h t - o f - W a y M a p p i n g a n d G e o t e c h n i c a l S e r v i c e s f o r t h e R o u t e 7 9
L a m b C a n y o n P r o j e c t a n d C e n t e n n i a l s c o n t r a c t w a s a m e n d e d t o i n c l u d e R i g h t - o f - W a y
M a p p i n g i n t h e i r s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s f o r t h e R o u t e 7 9 K e l l e r t o N e w p o r t P r o j e c t .
R C T C a n d C a l t r a n s h a s s u b s e q u e n t l y r e a c h e d r e s o l u t i o n o n t h e w o r d i n g f o r t h e I - 2 1 5
C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t . T h e a t t a c h e d R o u t e 7 9 C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t s w a s
p a t t e r n e d a f t e r t h e 1 - 2 1 5 A g r e e m e n t . T h e d r a f t A g r e e m e n t h a s b e e n r e v i e w e d b y
C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t a n d H e a d q u a r t e r s p e r s o n n e l a n d R C T C . L e g a l C o u n s e l . C a l t r a n s
c o m m e n t s h a v e b e e n i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e A g r e e m e n t a n d t h e d o c u m e n t h a s b e e n
s e n t t o R C T C L e g a l C o u n s e l f o r f i n a l r e v i e w .
Route 79 Coop Agreements
September 2, 1992
Page 2 of 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission approve the Route 79 Cooperative Agreements to be entered
into by Caltrans and RCTC for the following projects:
1) Project Development and Final Design PS&E for the
Route 79 Measure A Improvement Project, from Gilmans
Spring Road (PM 33.9) to First Street (PM 40.1) in the City
of Beaumont.
2) Project Development and Right -of -Way Engineering for
the Route 79 Measure A Improvement Project, from Keller
Road (PM 10.9) to Newport Road (PM 15.2).
KS:sc
AGENDA ITEM #4F
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT: Cajalco Corridor Study- Increase In Authorized Contract Amount For P&D
Technologies
September 2, 1992
Budget and Finance Committee
Mike Davis, Environmental Manager
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
RCTC received a request from P&D Technologies dated July 27, 1992 for an
additional increase in their authorized contract amount for the Cajalco Corridor Study
(Phase II). This request is in the amount of $10,905.75 and would increase the total
amount of their Phase II contract from the $114,940.00 approved by the Commission
at the February 13, 1992 meeting (Agenda Item 1288 1 to $125,845.75.
In addition P&D Technologies has requested $503.10 for attendance at a presentation
March 18, 1992 to brief Supervisor Dunlap and her staff on the overall status of the
Cajalco Corridor Study. The inclusion of this $503.10 would increase the total
contract value to $126,348.45.
Since the Commission has reached a major impasse as far as determining Corridor
alternatives, resolving landuse and traffic issues, and potential connections into
Orange County RCTC will require no further work by P&D Technologies at this time
to complete the Cajalco Corridor study. Caltrans will assume responsibility for any
future work for developing the Cajalco Corridor Study.
RCTC staff has reviewed P&D Technologies request and have determined that the
additional work summarized in their July 27, 1992 letter (attached) was not covered
in the original agreement and was necessary for collecting information, attending
meetings and conducting supporting studies to provide information used by the
Commission to determine extent of its future participation in the Phase II Cajalco
Corridor Study.
6TAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commissin approve P&D Technologies final request for funding in the
amount of $11,408.85 which will end the Commission's current paticipation in the
Cajalco Corridor Study.
MD:sc
AGENDA ITEM #5A
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Marilyn Williams, Senior Staff Analyst
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Measure A Commuter Bicycling Demonstration Program
Among the various projects submitted under the Commission's FY 91 /92 Congestion
Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) process was a proposal by the Riverside Bicycle
Commuter Coalition (RBCC). A non-profit organization, the RBCC was officially
organized in May, 1992. The promotion of bicycling as a safe and viable commuting
alternative is the mission of its membership comprised of bicycling commuters,
employee transportation coordinators, public and private. bicycle clubs, public and
private employers, and interested individuals.
Although a new organization, the RBCC has fashioned a strong public/private
partnership to address the needs of commuting bicyclists in Western Riverside
County. Their initial efforts have focused on seeking funds through membership fees
and the submittal of grant applications under the South Coast Air Quality Management
District's AB2766 process and RCTC's CMAQ process. In response to an RBCC
request, the Commission allocated $2,500 to support the preparation of the AB2766
grant.
The RBCC proposal requested CMAQ funding in the amount of $212,280 with a 20%
match of $53,320 for a total project cost of $266,600. Five program areas were
proposed to be implemented including education, bicycle to work program assistance,
motorist awareness campaign, facilities loan program, and database matchlists. The
proposal is attached for reference.
While the RBCC proposal was not funded under the CMAQ process, its merits caused
staff to evaluate its application to the Measure A Commuter Assistance Program. The
proposal's focus is broad based and responds to the fact that most commuters within
Western Riverside County travel less than 10 miles to work. They are the hardest
group of commuters to move into alternative forms of transportation because of the
close distances between work and home.
Page Two
September 2, 1992
Measure A Commuter Bicycling Demonstration Program
The impact a strong commuter bicycling program can make is illustrated by Fleetwood
Enterprises, Inc. Their "Mud, Sweat & Gears" program has attracted over 11 % of the
employees (70 + 1 at their Rudicill headquarters site into commuting by bicycle at least
one day a week.
Staff meet with the RBCC Board to determine if they would be interested in a
consultant arrangement under the Commission's Measure A Commuter Assistance
Program. The Board expressed their excitement at the opportunity to contract with
the Commission and took formal action to authorize its Chairperson to represent the
RBCC in development of an agreement.
During the meeting, the CMAQ proposal was reviewed in detail to identify those tasks
of the proposal that were consistent with the approach of existing Measure A funded
commuter assistance programs. Generally, those tasks which provide services directly
to the commuter and employer were considered the highest priority, such as a regional
bicycle map, commuter bicycling handbook and newsletter, bike clinics, and
equipment loan program. Tasks which would NOT be included in a first year
demonstration are a mobile resource unit, video, radio campaign and matching
database software.
It is staff's recommendation that a Commuter Bicycling Demonstration Program be
developed and implemented to determine it's effectiveness in shifting local work
related trips from the automobile to the bicycle. Within the context of the RBCC
CMAQ proposal, and as modified by staff comments above, it is recommended that
staff be authorized to negotiate an agreement with the RBCC, subject to legal counsel
review. Measure A commuter assistance funds are proposed to fund the
demonstration program for the period September '92 thru June '93 at an amount not
to exceed $160,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission:
1) Direct staff to negotiate and finalize an agreement with the Riverside Bicycle
Commuter Coalition, pursuant to the attached CMAQ proposal, for the
development and implementation of a Commuter Bicycling Demonstration
Program;
2) Approve the agreement as negotiated by staff, subject to legal counsel review,
and authorize the Executive Director to execute, on behalf of the Commission,
said agreement with RBCC; and
3) Approve the expenditure of Measure A Commuter Assistance funds in an
amount not to exceed $160,000 for the bicycle commuter program for the
period September '92 thru June '93.
AGENDA ITEM #5B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Marilyn Williams, Senior Staff Analyst
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Measure A Lease Park-n-Ride Program
For the past two years, the Commission has contracted with Inland Transportation
Services (ITS) to secure and manage park-n-ride lease agreements with private
property owners. During FY90/91, two consulting firms were under contract as a
mechanism to establish performance standards for services. Given that no lease
agreements had been completed by one of the firms, the Commission did not renew
that firms contract for a second year.
The first two years of the lease park-n-ride program efforts have focused on acquiring
sites along major highway corridors. The attached list identifies the leased locations
totalling 435 parking spaces at seven sites. Five sites were secured in the first year
and two sites totalling 174 spaces were secured during FY91 /92.
The attached FY92/93 proposal from ITS outlines completed tasks for the year ending
August 15, 1992. In addition to negotiating two new lease agreements, ITS:
■ renewed four existing agreements;
■ coordinated the installation of park-n-ride freeway and local street signs with
Ca!trans and property owners;
■ marketed the locations through the Press Enterprise and Corona Independent
newspapers, distributed flyers to 900+ Riverside and Orange County
employers, and posted 750 + flyers on automobile windshields at park-n-ride
lots;
* coordinated with regional rideshare agencies to ensure updated site information
was included on commuter rideshare matchlists;
• surveyed leased sites to determine use rates; and,
• prepared and submitted various documentation reports as required by staff.
Page Two
September 2, 1992
Measure A Lease Park-n-Ride Program
Based on performance and program continuity, staff recommends that the ITS lease
park-n-ride consultant agreement be amended to include services for the period
August 15, 1992 to August 15, 1993. Hourly rates established in FY90/91 contract
would remain unchanged: project manager at $65/hour and marketing specialist at
$45/hour. Services would continue to be rendered on an as needed basis under the
direction of Commission staff.
The previous two contracts included a not to exceed limit of $25,000 per year.
Expenditures for the year just ending are estimated at $17,000. For FY92/93 staff
recommends that Measure A highway funds be allocated in an amount not to exceed
$ 20, 000.
The lowered contract limit reflects an anticipated change in effort from negotiation of
lease agreements to marketing of existing sites to increase use. A survey of the
original five lots (261 spaces) in March '92 set a base use rate of 35%. A May '92
survey of the same lots showed a 47% use rate, a 12% increase. The two newest
lots (174) were also survey in May showing a base use rate of 18%.
Staff will continue to evaluate the need for additional park-n-ride lease sites. It is
anticipated that smaller sites located further east and south of the Riverside/Corona
areas may be the most appropriate areas to secure lease parking spaces. This focus
reflects a change from the first two years and is responsive to changing conditions.
First, Caltrans has completed negotiations with the Galleria at Tyler for 400 spaces
and California Baptist College for 222 spaces. Caltrans construction of 135 spaces
at Rt.60 at Orange Street is scheduled for completion April '93. Moreno Valley's
Canyon Springs Mall has contacted Caltrans to dedicate 100 park-n-ride spaces. As
a result, a total of 857 new spaces will be added to the existing RCTC and Caltrans
inventory of 1,185 spaces.
Second, the implementation of commuter rail service and related park-n-ride and kiss-
n-ride facilities will provide a new mode choice to commuters. Use of rail service may
cause a shift in existing commuter patterns. The lease park-n-ride program should
continue to be flexible and responsive to changing conditions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission:
(1) Approve, pursuant to the attached proposal and subject to legal counsel
review, amendment of the existing contract for lease park-n-ride services
with Inland Transportation Services at hourly rates of S65/Project
Manager and S45/Marketing Specialist,
(2) Authorize the Executive Director to execute the amended agreement on
behalf of the Commission, and
(3) Allocate Measure A highway funds in an amount not to exceed $20,000
for the period August 15, 1992 to August 15, 1993.
AGENDA ITEM #6A
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
FROM: Mark T. Massman, Measure A Project Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Value Engineering Review of Downtown Commuter Rail Station
RCTC, Bechtel, and SCRRA staff are performing a value engineering review of the
design for the downtown commuter rail station. It is expected that the review will be
complete and a report will be made to the Commission. Several cost savings options
will be presented.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission receive the report and provide direction on cost savings options
to be implemented.
MTM:sc
AGENDA ITEM #6B
DATE:
TO:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
September 2, 1992
Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Tom Horkan, Measure A Project Coordinator
Mark T. Massman, Measure A Project Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Planning, Environmental, and Engineering Design Consultant Contract for
Commuter Rail Station at Limonite Avenue and Pedley Road
The second commuter rail station on the Union Pacific line from Riverside to Los
Angeles is proposed to be located on 4.6 Acres of property currently owned by Union
Pacific near the intersection of Limonite Avenue and Pedley Road in Riverside County.
RCTC recently completed a selection process to rank consultants to complete site
planning; environmental study and clearance; and preparation of plans, specifications,
and estimates for commuter rail stations in the Metrolink system. The top ranked firm
in the selection process was Pountney and Associates. Pountney and Associates has
offices in San Diego and Palm Desert and has performed similar activities for the
Escondido multi -modal station.
Staff prepared a Request for Proposal for the Limonite-Pedley station planning and
engineering work. Pountney and Associates has responded to that RFP with a
proposed scope of work. Staff has found the proposal to be in general accordance
with the RFP. Staff will continue to negotiate with Pountney and Associates and will
present the final proposed consultant cost at the Budget and Finance committee
meeting.
Consultant Proposal
The proposed scope of work for the Limonite-Pedley station includes three phases of
work.
Phase I is a planning phase which involves developing site plan options, identifying
physical site constraints, and identification of potential environmental issues.
Phase II will involve all of the environmental studies and preparation of the
environmental document for the project. Preliminary Engineering needed to complete
the environmental clearance will be performed in Phase II. During Phase II the
Page Two
September 2, 1992
Planning, Environmental, and Engineering Design Consultant Contract for Commuter
Rail Station at Limonite Avenue and Pedley Road
consultant will also perform studies on the development opportunities for the site and
any surrounding property that may be available. The County of Riverside owns excess
property from the construction of the Limonite -Van Buren Grade Separation project
that may be potential joint -use development parcels.
Phase III of the project will include final design and the preparation of Plans,
Specifications and Estimates for the construction bid package.
To assist in the completion of the three phases of the work effort a project advisory
committee will be formed consisting of staff from the County of Riverside, SCRRA,
RTA, Schiermeyer Consulting Services, RCTC, Bechtel, and the project consultant.
Based on the use of CMAQ funding for construction of the platform and parking lot,
the environmental process will include clearance under both CEQA and NEPA. Staff
is working with Caltrans and the Federal Transit Administration on the details of the
CMAQ funding requirements which will need to be met for the Limonite-Pedley station
and exploring all options to have the most timely implementation of the station, and
insure the federal funding for the project.
Pountney and Associates has estimated the consultant services to be $244,434.00
for completion of all three phases of work. RCTC and Bechtel staff will be meeting
with Pountney and Associates during the next week to finalize a consultant cost and
final scope of work. Phase I and Phase II are expected to be completed in December
of this year. Phase III work would be commenced in December and could be
completed in late January or February. The Phase III work may be accelerated if the
project concept is finalized earlier than December and there appears to be no
environmental concerns with the site.
The RCTC standard consultants agreement will be executed for the consulting
services.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Commission approve the contract with Pountney and Associates for
completion of planning, environmental, and design services for the proposed Limonite-
Pedley commuter rail station. The currently proposed consultant cost is $244,434.00
for all three phases. Staff will present a final proposed cost at the Budget and
Finance Committee meeting. Staff also recommends that a 15% contingency fund
be established for extra work to be authorized by the Executive Director. The
currently proposed total work authorization by the Commission including the 15%
extra work fund would be $281,000.
AGENDA ITEM #BC
AGENDA ITEM No. 6C
BUDGET & FINANCE COMMITTEE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Develop Rail Parcel Information Database for RCTC
The Commission currently owns parcels at various locations that were acquired to
facilitate project development for both highways and rail. When the Rail negotiations
are finalized, the Commission will have an additional one hundred parcels to manage
and keep track of the information that is associated with each parcel. A database
system can be designed to help keep track of the important information that is
associated with each parcel as well any legal agreements or documents associated
with each parcel such as maps, and other pertinent data.
It is estimated that a database can be designed to provide the necessary input and
reporting functions for less than $5,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That several bids should be obtained to provide the database design for RCTC with
a cost not to exceed $5,000. Legal Counsel will prepare an agreement with the low
bidder to develop the RCTC database.
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -MEASURE A
BUDGET VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Revenues
Sales tax allocations- Due to the recession taxable sales in
Riverside County for the first two quarters of the year
declined between eight and nine percent. The rate of decline
improved for the third quarter with taxable sales decreasing
only four percent. Fouth quarter declined 5.5% compared to
fourth quarter of the prior year from $12,312,475 to
$11,622,982. For the twelve months ended June 30, 1992, sales
tax revenues declined 4.5%, from $48,286,350 to 46,107,144.
The rate of decline was actually encouraging given that
estimates earlier in the year predicted the decline could
potentially be greater than 10%.
Interest income- Interest earnings are higher than expected
due to a slower drawdown of bond funds than originally
anticipated. Additionally, the interest rate on the County's
pool was estimated for budget purposes at six percent, but for
the first part of the year it has has averaged about seven
percent. Though that rate is rapidly declining as the County's
pool of investments matures and is reinvested, interest income
for the year will still exceed budgeted amount as the County's
interest earnings are only posted through quarter ending March
31, 1992.
Expenditures
Salaries and Benefits- Not all positions originally
anticipated in the budget were filled. It was determined that
one of the senior staff analyst positions originally approved
was not needed at this time. Step increases have also been
modest given the low rate of inflation and the current
recession.
Measurement A management- Bechtel invoices had only been
received through May 1992. With the June invoice the Bechtel
contract would be close to 100% of budget.
Legal services- Legal expenditures include toll road pass thru
costs for JHK and Ernst & Young. These costs will be
classified as project expenditures at year end. Also, rail
negotiations have required extensive involvement from 0,
Melveny & Myers.
Right of Way- Includes purchase of the Ferguson property for
$15.2 million and several other right of way acquisitions
along the 60/91/I-215 interchange.
Local street and roads- Streets and roads disbursements are
based on a percentage of revenues. If revenues are higher
than anticipated, then streets and roads will naturally exceed
the budgeted amount.
Regional arterial and commuter rail- Both of these budget
categories were budgeted as program amounts(i.e., full amount
available to be spent). These programs are in early stages of
development and therefore have not incurred major costs to
date.
Commuter rail- Commuter rail expenditures consists primarily
of $1.7 million installment payment toward the RCTC share of
the JPA budget, another $1.7 million for the Taylor Yard
facility, $1.9 million for the purchase of the Serfas Club
rail site, and $5.5 million for the Pierce Street station sit
Other costs have been relatively low pending the finalization
of the UP deal and continued negotiation with Santa Fe.
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -SAFE
BUDGET VARIANCE EXPLANATIONS
Revenues
DMV user fees- The State traditionally runs two months behind
in forwarding DMV user fees to the countiesl. These revenues
are only through April 1992.
Interest income- Interest earnings will be lower than expected
due to a more rapid decline in the County's pooled rate than
staff anticipated. The latter half of the year the County's
pool rate has been less than 5.5%. Staff had projected about
6%.
Expenditures
Salaries and Benefits- -Jerry Rivera, Staff Analyst is being
trained to handle a substantial portion of SAFE activities.
Allocation of his salary along with that of Hideo Sugita has
resulted in SAFE salaries and benefits being higher than
originally budgeted.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Coordinator
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Addition of Psomas Tasks 11 & 12 to develop Standards and Prepare a
Rail Geographic Information System for RCTC
Psomas & Associates is currently providing the primary survey control for RCTC. To
manage the survey control information as well as all of the survey and mapping
information that is being prepared by all of the survey Consultants currently working
for the Commission, Psomas developed a Survey Records Database. Since all of the
information relating to surveying is geographical in nature, a Geographic Information
System (GIS) was used. The GIS system utilized Intergraph graphics and an Oracle
database. The system allows the operator to point to a graphical image/map on the
screen and bring up the information associated with the object. The result was a very
powerful tool to simplify the management of a very complex package of information.
When the Rail negotiations are finalized, the Commission will again be faced with
dealing with a large amount of Rail information that will lend itself to being managed
by a GIS system. The GIS system can be designed to keep track of and administer
legal agreements and documents associated with each parcel, as well as maps, utility
information, and any other pertinent data.
The additional scope of work for Psomas with regards to the GIS Rail Database will
be twofold. First, Psomas will prepare a set of GIS standards that can be used as a
basis for the preparation of any new information. The standards will facilitate the
entry of information into the GIS system as well as enhance the useability of the
information. For example, if future mapping associated with the rail alignment is all
done to the same standard and using the same software, reporting can be processed
based on individual items such as specific utilities. If no standards are utilized, the
information can still be entered into the database; however, it may be more difficult
to separate or process the information at a later date. The ability to filter the
information to display only the items of interest at any particular time is extremely
useful when analyzing the information contained in the GIS database.
Page Two
September 2, 1992
Addition of Psomas Tasks 11 & 12 to develop Standards and Prepare a Rail
Geographic Information System for RCTC
Currently, LACTC, OCTA, Riverside County, and San Bernardino County all have GIS
systems that can be compatible with the RCTC GIS system. Psomas will study these
existing systems while preparing the standards for the RCTC GIS system. This will
facilitate the transfer of information between the systems to share the information
that is currently available.
The second task will have Psomas generate the initial GIS Rail Database. This initial
system will address the Rail Lines pertinent to Riverside County with more emphasis
on the Lines to be owned and or leased by RCTC. The initial database will contain
items such as existing alignment, information on parcels adjacent to the track and
stations, as well as any agreements that pertain to a portion of the track.
Additional information regarding the advantages of producing a GIS to manage the rail
information is contained in the attached letter from Psomas & Associates.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The actual scope of work and cost to add the above two tasks to the existing Psomas
contract will be presented at the Administration meeting. The details of the
agreement are currently being reviewed by staff and Legal Counsel.
WRH:sc
August 24, 1992
Mr. William Hughes
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, California 92501
Subject: Proposed Tasks 11 and 12
Dear Bill:
PSOMAS
I am writing this letter to point out some of the benefits of using GIS to manage the
information that RCTC will inherit as it assumes ownership of the railways for the
commuter rail system. As I am sure you are aware, ownership of the railways will
put RCTC in a position of responsibility for administering all of the legal
agreements, documents, maps, and drawings along the route.
Several agencies have created different portions of the information that RCTC will
need at an expense of millions of dollars. The approach that Psomas proposes
would make use of their previous efforts thereby saving money for RCTC.
This information may be found in both digital and hardcopy form and may come
from a spread sheet, a file cabinet, a CAD drawing, a mainframe data base, or a GIS.
If RCTC can draw on these sources and combine them for its usage the result would
be a tremendous savings of time and resources.
Because so much of the large volume of data that makes up a rail system has
geographic references, GIS is an excellent tool for information management. An
approach such as the one that Psomas is presenting allows an organization to
integrate dissimilar sets of information from a number sources, access them
through a common interface and use them in concert. GIS serves as that common
interface and provides a geographic perspective for queries and analysis in addition
to the standard data base queries and reporting.
Mr. William Hughes
Page 2
August 24, 1992
PSOMAS
During our latest conversation three primary areas were brought up as key issues for
GIS to address: Responsibility of Ownership, Project Development, and
Maintenance. Below I have noted some of the capabilities of GIS to address these
issues and enhance the operation of RCTC.
Responsibility of Ownership - GIS provides an interface to financial, client, and
County Assessor data bases based on geographic parameters. This allows a user to
calculate revenue from leases and agreements, produce maps showing the location
of any or all leases and easements, and produce mailings when property owners
near an RCTC property need notifications.
An inventory of assets can be taken (miles of track, number of switches, etc.) in total
or by area. The location and information regarding a utility, either crossing or
running adjacent to a track can be accessed. GIS can be used to manage rail
valuation and Haz/Tox information. By using GIS, RCTC as an organization that
must acquire and sell land, will better informed to make decisions.
Project Development - GIS provides regional maps (zoning, land use,
transportation corridors, political boundaries, soil types), the use of demographic
data for estimating potential ridership, location and information for hazardous
material sites, and integration with CAD for design work. In addition to the
location of these features, GIS can cross reference data sets and produce such
products as a map showing all of the stations within 1000 feet of a high pressure gas
line.
Because of the ability of the system to assimilate a number of different types of data,
a user can combine survey information, digital orthophotography, utility mapping,
right-of-way mapping, and photogrammetry in one system to conduct work on a site
such as a proposed station.
Maintenance - GIS provides work order generation, access to reference documents,
mapping, analysis, and reports. GIS can automate maintenance of the tracks,
stations, switches, etc.. The system can be used to project fares generated from the
amount of ridership, and track crime to aid in resource allocation for security.
One of the greatest advantages to the implementation of this system is that LACTC,
OCTA, Riverside County, and San Bernardino County, among other agencies,
employ the same system. -:-Lis compatibility will allow RCTC to share information
with a number of organizations that have data that could prove very useful.
Mr. William Hughes
Page 3
August 24, 1992
�s0MAS
I have touched on some of the applications and advantages of GIS as an information
management tool for RCTC. Bill, if you have further questions about the RCTC's
use of GIS please call me at (714) 751-7373
Sincerely,
PSOMAS AND ASSOCIATES
Jerry A. Wagner
Vice President
Geographic Information Services
KD:pjw
�L�
AGENDA ITEM #7A
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
FROM: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: State Budget Impact On Transportation Funding
There have been several Legislative proposals for the State Budget to use
transportation revenues to reduce the State deficit. The most significant is to use
20% of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) which is returned to all counties
for transit and may also be used under specified condition for local streets and roads
purposes in most counties including Riverside County.
The Commission staff and Legislative Advocates have been monitoring and these
proposals and advising our Legislators of our concerns along with other Regional
Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPA's) throughout the state. A report will be
presented at the Commission meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Discussion and possible action.
PB:sc
AGENDA ITEM #7B
NO STAFF MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM #7C
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: September 2, 1992
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Dean Martin, Controller
Louie Martin, Project Controls Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial and Cost Reports
Attached are Combining Statements of Revenues and Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances (Unaudited) for the Quarter Ended June 30, 1992. Also, attached are the RCTC
Measure A Highway Projects Budget Report by Route, Contract Commitment, Contract
Amendments, DBE/MBE Utilization Report, and the Contract Status Report through June
30, 1992 prepared by Bechtel Civil, Inc.
Detailed supporting material for all contracts and Cooperative Agreements is available
from Bechtel staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
LM/DM:sc
STATEME )F REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FU' 'ALANCES
BUDGET ,. ACTUAL
MEASURE A OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
For Quarter Ending June 30, 1992
REVENUES
Sales tax allocations
Interest income
Reimbursements
Other income
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
Administration:
Salaries and benefits
Measure A management
Professional services
Office lease
Legal services
Other expenses
Commissioners Per Diem
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
Programs:
Right of Way Acquisition
Highways
Local street and roads
Regional arterials
Commuter assistance
Commuter rail
Special transp./transit
TOTAL PROGRAMS
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Operating transfers in (out)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES)
AND REVENUES OVER(UNDER) EXPENDITURE
FUND BALANCE -July 1, 1991
Actual
$46,107,144
5,853,547
472,521
249,556
52,682,768
Budget
$45,800,000
6,250,000
250,000
0
52,300,000
Remaining
Balance
($307,144)
396,453
(222,521)
(249,556)
(382,768)
Percent
Utilization
101%
94%
189%
0%
101 %
495,851 765,766 269,915 65%
1,724,081 1,850,000 125,919 93%
392,585 429,888 37,303 91 %
110,904 126,722 15,818 880/0
1,082,484 980,000 (102,484) 1100/0
214,111 277,217 63,106 770/0
18,924 21,889 2,965_ 860/0
4,038,940 4,451,482 412,542 910/0
22,308,362 25,700,000 3,391,638 87%
22,631,409 25,105,663 2,474,254 900/0
17,940,661 17,367,360 (573,301) 1030/0
654,137 2,750,000 2,095,863 240/0
273,929 500,000 226,071 55%
11,558,085 30,670,200 19,112,115 38%
1,656,696 2,575,000 918,304 64%
77,023,279 104,668,223 27,644,944 74%
72,280 103,092 30,812 70%
81,134,499 109,222,797 28,088,298 74%
(28,451,731) (56,922,797) (28,471,066) 50%
(10,824,777) (10,824,726) 51 100%
(39,276,508)
130,472,961 (130,472,961)
FUND BALANCE -June 30, 1992
$91,196,453 ($56,922,797) (148,119,250)
ESL/961' 16S £06' l81'6l$ ZZ8'866'9£$ l 1S'SZ$
196'ZL6'0£ 1
(809'9LZ'6£)
(LLL' 6Z8'01$)
ElE'6SE'8t
060' LZ8
OS L' l66' 6L
WE' Z60'8E)
(596'SL8'S)
llE'ZZ
00C £
(1EL' lS6'8Z) 060'LZ8 (E98'991'Z£) OOZ'£
6617'6£1'l8S S66'661 EL8'9£8'S£ £ZE'569
08Z'ZL$
6LZ'EZO'LLS 61L'661 SZ9'Z60'E£ EZ£'S69
969' 999' IS
S90'8SS' l l$ 6L9'81.C9
6Z6'ELZ$
LEl'6S9$
199' 066' L IS £Z£' S69
606' 1E9'ZZ$ 66L'661. L£Z'S16' lZ
Z9E'80£'ZZ$ 6tL'896'9
0176'8E0'6$ 96l
6Z6'81$
II CPIZS
86Z' 66L' Z 0
PRIM' 1$ 9LL'906
606'01 l$
S8S' Z6ES
180'6ZL'LS 180'6ZL'l
l98'S66$ 961 16£'611.
89L'Z89'ZS$
9SS'66Z$
1ZS'ZL6$
L6S'ES8'S$
66l'LOl'96$
lelol
6ululgwo0
SEO'LZO' l 0LO'OL9'E
66
S 60' ELZ
SEO'LZO' l 91.6'96CE
.IsuoO
e11a4aeoa
-tsuo0
'A10 -Isom
lAdLia
£ZS' 869
OOZ' E
£Z£'S69
apiaA
oled
6Z9' 60E' 8 l $
L 68' 0L6' Z l
Z89'EEE'S
(ELE'106'l)
S50'S£Z'L
16 t' £99' 9
ltPl'E99'9
000'609' t
E£ l'£6
E89' l
LE l' 6S9
88l'SS6'V
0
669'Z8S'S l$
LL9'LOS'ZZ
(8L0'SZ6'9)
(6E6' L 60 £)
68S'ESC l$ Z661 'OE aunt-30NV1V0 ONfl3
£99'9Z9' l
(6L0'EL6)
(6El'Lae E) (VL0'ELP)
S LS' 819'9E ZOL'OZZ' l
08Z'ZL
l 66' ZLE' 9E
969' L 6 l
8LZ' 96Z' 9
96Z' ZLZ
OS l' 06L' Z l
EZ6'9LS
869' 66E' 9 l
6L0' 96 l
L9L'6l
LO£' 9Z L
96l'868'£L 9L£'l69'ZE
£96'9£Z 19Z'9 - -
EL6' 161
LOL'OSL 686'109
9Z9' L 16'Z l 899' l68' l£
AalleA AlunoO
ella4aeo0 weisaM
ZZ6'86l' l
6Z6'8l
Ill'OLZ
l66'95l
606' 01 l
58S'Z6E
LS6' 6SZ
8Z9'L6L
£8L' 9
EOS'L
S08' 6L
LES'8S9
letaua0
1661 't Alnf-30NV1V8 ONfl3
31:1f1110N3dX3 (1:130N11)83A0 S3f1N3Aal ONV
(S3sn)S30unos 9NIONVNI3 u3H10
Ono) ul statsuen 6ulleiad0
(sash) S30unos 9NIONVNI3 u3H10
S3u(1110N3dX3 (830140 u3A0 S3f1N3A313
S3uf111ON3dX3 1V101
Aeon° pm:le0
SWVUJOdd 1V101
tlsueil!'dsuen lelaads
lieu talnwwoO
aouelsissV talnwwo0
sleuaUe leu01608
spew pue )00.11s leaol
sdeMU6iH
uoipsmbay AeM to 14618
•swei6old
NOI1Vu1SINIWOV 1V101
wa1O Jed sMuolss1ww00
sasuadxa ia410
saalAias 1e601
°seal 031110
saalAJas leuolssalad
tuawa6euew y amseayy
stllauaq pue saueleS
:uoddns wei6ad pue uoltegslulwpy
S3uf1110N3dX3
S3f1N3A38 1V101
10410
sluawasingwlau
awoaw Isaiatul
suo4eaolle xet sales
S3f1N3A3u
Z661 'OE aunt' 6ulpu3 s4luoyy 0A10M1 to j
NOISSI011100 N011V11A0dSNVu1 1l1Nf100 301Su3A1E1 3H1 30 V 31311SV3141
S3ONV1V8 ONfl3 NI 939NVHO ONV 8313f111ON3dX3 ONV S3f1N3A31=1 30 1N31/431V1S 03N181103
CoMIFINED STATEMENT OE REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN MINI) BALANCES
MI,ASIIRE A OE 'HIE RIVERSIDE COIINTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
I or the (Quarter Ended June 30, 1992
DRAFT
Western Coachella Palo Wesl. Cly. Coachella C liming
General County Valley Verde Cons1. Const. 'Lola!
REVENUES
82
Sales lax allocations
8,184,243 3,263,220 175,519 $11,622,9
Interest income 22,940 254,011 238,761 666 585,894 259,843 S1,362,115
2,499 89,000 83,937 $175,416
Rcuuhursements (S I , I OL,517)
Other - 4,893- --(_1,107,410) - _- _._
TOTAL REVENUES 30,332 7,419,844 3,501,981 176,185 669,831 259,843 S12,058,016
1XPENDITURES
AdnunislraUon:
Salaries and benefits 4,169 (84,528) 114,391 196 S34,228
Measure A management
(236,882) 776,554 $539,672
I19,305 $119,305
Professional services 520,352
Office lease 20,352
33,638 (136,791) 400,004 $296,851
Legal services 583,427
Other expenses 83,427 83,427
Commissioners Per Diem - - 4,408 08
- -- _ -- .... ___-- - - - -
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 28,417 (221,319) 0 0 1,290,949 196 $1,098,243
Programs:
Right of Way Acquisition
683,939 223,480 $907,419
Ilighways 357,029 6,445,120 199,749 $7,001,898
3,257,702 1,138,047 175,520 $4,571,269
Local street and mats SLIl,61 I
Regional arterials 168,696 44,915
Commuter Assistance
78,716 250 $78,966
Commuler rail 5,775,748 2,820 1,323 31,732 $5,811,623
71,331 --_ 571,331
Special transp./transit _- _ _ - - -
TOTAL PROGRAMS 10,224,465 ~1,30-
9,813 221,758 6,700,332 199,749 $18,656,117
eapilal Outlay 32,917 - $32,917
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 61,334 10,003,146 1,309,813 221,758 7,991,281 199,945 S19,787,277
REVENUES OVER (TINDER) EXPENDITURES (31,002) --(2,583,302) 2,192,168- --- - (45,573) (7,321,450-) 59,898 ($7,729,261)
(YIIIIiR FINANCING SOURCES (USES) � 7(16,195
Operating transfers in (out) 3,644,479 (475,209) (5,875,465) (2,706,195)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES(USES)
AND REVENUESOVER(IINDER) EXPENDITURE (31,002) 1,061,177 1,716,959 (45,573) (13,196,915) 59,898 (10,435,456)
MINI) BALANCE April I, 1992 1,184,591 14,521,422 16,633,808 24,846 5(1,145,737 19,121,505 88,56.5,634
FUND BALANCE June 30, 1992
$1,153,589 $15,582,599 $18,350,767 ($20,727) $36,948,822 $19,181,403 91,196,453
_ . _ _ -
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES
For Quarter Ending June 30, 1992
REVENUES
DMV user fees
Interest income
Reimbursements
Actual
810,983
126,377
TOTAL REVENUES 937,360
Budget % Utilization
960,000
180,000
0
84 %
70 %
1,140,000 82 c
EXPENDITURES
Administration:
Salaries and benefits 54,813 44,828 122%
Professional services 12,684 105,535 12%
Office lease 8,753 10,004 87%
Legal services 6,381 8,149 78%
Other expenses 24,145 31,024 78 %
Commissioners Per Diem 1,494 1,728 86%.
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 108,270 201,268 54%
Program:
Call Box Maintenance
Call Box Installation
Call Box Operation
TOTAL PROGRAMS
130,992 175,000 75..c
181,253 448,500 40%
218,481 225,000 97%
530,726 848,500 63%
Capital Outlay 5,796
8,139 71 %
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 644,792 1,057,907 61%
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES 292,568 82,093
FUND BALANCE -July 1, 1991 2,224,308 2,098,910
FUND BALANCE -June 30, 1992 S2,516,876 S2,181,003
COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
For Quarter Ending June 30, 1992
Actual
Budget % Utilization
REVENUES
Sales tax allocations $1,070,000 1,050,000 102%
Interest income 31,643 33,700 94%
Reimbursements
891
Other income
770
TOTAL REVENUES 1,103,304 1,083,700 102%
EXPENDITURES
Administration:
Salaries and benefits
Professional services
Office lease
Legal services
Other expenses
Commissioners Per Diem
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
275,073 373,365 74
455,628 513,454 89%
26,267 30,013 88 %
25,445 25,714 99%
49,398 66,320 74%
4,482 5.184 86%
836,293 1,014,050 82%
Programs:
Local/regional distributions 427,404 462,980 92%
TOTAL PROGRAMS 427,404 462.980 92%
Capital Outlay
17,391 24,417 71%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,281,088 1,501,447 85%
REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES (177,784) (417,747)
FUND BALANCE —July 1, 1991 404,573 398,812
FUND BALANCE —June 30, 1992 S226,789 (S18,935)
i►LL'ZYL'E6$
L90'179£'t LS
SO L'L L9S
LZV E LL'i7S
6S9'0.6S't'S
OtT6'ZS£' L$
LE£'86Z' LES
88Z'SZV'OZS
09Lr9SE$
£Sires£' LS
8ES' LZZ'ZS
LLV E L9'£S
EEL'S8Z'8S
8178'LSZ'9 LS
9N111V101
L 10 I. e6ed
095 1:1311 Vf10 110A alVd S3010ANI d0 MOWN
099 N31lid110 110A 03SS3001:1d S3010ANI ]O ki39WnN
06L'BLV'171$
%Z8
500'089'LZit
S6E'Z1.6.16LS
S1V101
LZ6'9l8'SS
96001
98E'ZZ9'tLS
SKE ZZ9'blS
11V1:11i3111WW0O
1+£Z'9t1$
96001
PL9'ZMt
1•L9'ZMS
301F1-N-)11:IVd
ti89'6£ It
%86
t►V6'98614
COS' 1VO'SS
'SOAS V NVId WVH9011d
EL9'6£55
%86
000'1389'9S
000'9LL'9S
"AH3S 1WOW 1O31013d 131H039
90 L'L99S
9636
E6L'00044
6Z9' lEE'.11
WV1i901id 'A01id14139NVH01i31N1
0lt,L08$
%99
17Z9'Eet• ZES
LLB' SL9'LES
S1231'01Ad 91Z-1
ZZZ'6E9'£$
%99
LL0'955'EE$
£Le'ZtrE'8ES
16 31110E1
%56
LL l' 186S
t'SE'8£0' LS
S133r01:1d 1 L 131/1011
00'£89'£17LS
96001
000'61.£17 3
000'61-C1gt
99311101:1
t•LL' LESS
%99
L£8'069'ZS
L 15'990'ES
6L 3111011
9£9' Met
%06
009'895'9S
688.0ZE'L$
VL 311101:1
6EZ'£Et?' IS
000'9091'3
333119V 'd000 VNOFiOO
N AL '0£ 3NrIr
nHH131V0
Ol S31in11ON3dX3
MI. 'OE 3Nnr
ONIONS kf311iVn0
E103 3kIn11ON3dX3
O311WW00
1390ns d0
39V1N301:13d
31VO Ol
S1N3W11WW00
1V1ln10V1i1N00
N011V0011V
O3ZIHOH1nV
NOISSIWW00
Z66L 'OE 3N11P ONION] 0011:13d
11:10d311139an9 A11J31111M
S1031'011d AVMH9IH V 3H11SV3W 9191A
OI1dIH0S:
103PO1:1d
. to L e6ed
9ES`ZSS$
9ES'ZSS$
l6ti'tbSS' L$
l617'VVE$
000'OLZ'l$
896'Z LE'Z$
S L L'ZLS$
ES8'017L' l$
LE6'OLL'E$
60l' l L$
9ZZ'LOS'l$
Z09'Z6 L'Z$
ZS0'ZOL'8$
ZSO'ZOL'8$
Z98'LVL$
809'OOZ$
809'OOZ$
0£1►' L6$
OEt7' L6$
09VL6$
60l'lL$
t'Z l'09$
LZZ'9Z$
6L£'9L14
6LE'9lt'$
%DO l
%00 L
4/000 L
9600l
O'000 L
0/0001
%88
%88
%L8
%68
0/000 l
0/0001
%£8
960't+Sv' L$
960'1798$
000'009$
000'6LE'bl$
(V)
000'00 L'E L$
000'62' l$
L£8'069`ZS
195'EO9S
OLZ'888'l$
5l l'68L`9t
009'660'Z$
6LZ'6L l'Z$
9£Z'O LS'Z$
(E)
196017St+' L$
960'VS8$
000'009$
000'61810 L$
(V)
000' Ofl L'E L$
000'6LZ'L$
l 1-V990`£s
O00'S L6$
LLS'LLL'ZS
6LE`lZE'L$
009'660'Z$
6LZ'6L L'Z$
(t►)
OOS'ZVO'E$
000'S09`V
(E)
000'909'173
l L t 31n011'miens
(tsz6 '6 LZ6 '9 L060E1)
Apms Joppio0
(SL060E1) ueoi uon3nAsuo0
S1031'0dd 11131f101:1
98 31C10E111/1019(18
(£ 1Z60d)
uol ampuo0
(L0680E1) u61sea 1eu1d
S103POiid 98 31n011
6L 3Ln0H 3V1A18118
(l 10601:1) loe[wd uompueS
(8116'9116'ZLl6'LLL601:1)
-uoi 1nu3/6.16u31tieu 1 Lu 11eJd
S1.03POdd 6L 311101i
6L 811110l '1V10.01119
(6ZZ6
9ZZ6'SZZ601:1) uoll3misuo0
(ZZ l6'L L l6' S l L6'90 L 608)
uomu3/6a6u3 Amu1w11eid
(LOZ6'90Z6'Z L0601:1)
lueweei6y emmedoo0
81331'0E1d t►L 311101:1
'd003 VN01:1001V10181IS
(80680H)
(up3u11'eldevetawS)
'331:19V 'd000 VN0800
31V0 Ol Z661 ' l£ AIrif (BD WWOO 31Va Ol NOI1VOOTIV NOI1dI1:10330
S3df1110N3dX3 03ON3 H1NOW Aoaf18 d0 S1N31111WW00 03ZIdOH111V 103f0dd
1:10d 3df1110N3dX3 30V1N301:13d TidfllOVd1N00 NOISSIWWOO
311101:1 A81Nnd313 139an8
81331'01:Id AVMH' 31:111SV31+1 3101:1
ti IO Z e6ed
699'017917$ 803'69$
699'049'14 80Z'69$
LLZ'LL9'1$ LLL'SL£$
000'08Z$ 000'08Z$
LLZ'16E'L$ LLL'8£$
6Z8' l60`ZE$ Z6ti'E6L$
1.141799'8n 990'L1717$
886'9Z9'E$ 9Zti'9ti£$
ti917'tit78`OZ$ 9L1.'603
Z6L'80 l$
ZL0'098' l$ 9617'178l$
ti917'ElS'Z$ EOZ'6ZZ$
9£ l'Z9E'9l$
LLti'S$
%86
%86
%l6
0/000 L
%16
%98
%00 l
%S6
%LB
%00l
% L 8
%68
% L 8
000'889`9$
000'889'9$
E6L'000't3
000'099$
(l)
E6L'0S£'£$
tLL`Z60`LE'$
000'09L'ZE$
(S)
tiLL'ZEE'ti$
LL0'999'EE$
Z6L'80l$
169'EZ8'Z$
0E6'L9S'£$
899'SSO'LZ$
000'9LL`9$
000'9LL'9$
6Z9' Lent
000'099$
(l)
6Z9' l89'E$
LL9'919`111
000'09L'Z£$
(9)
LL8'998'17$
ELE'Z'toeVE$
Z6L'80 l$
LSL'LtiZ'E$
9ZZ'ti00'ti$
86 l'Z86'0£$
131H0391V1019nS
(00£6
00Z6' 0016' 0006' 00680 u)
'Au3S 1W9W 1031'01:1d 131H039
MN► 1101:131N1'1V1018f1S
(ooJoN 10 A1l0) OI ewnA
(ZE 1.6'LZ 16.9Z 16
SZ 1.6'17Z 1.6'LO 1.6'171060EI)
(S.uSd) 6)6u3 tieu!w!le1d
VIVu9013d'A01:1dWl39NVH01:131N1
51Zl1V1oans
(ZZZ60u 'ZudL000
'8 l u d L000' 6006'ti006' £0060u)
Aum-;o-1":1
(006'9 l06'800601:1)
vopinu3/6.16u3 Aieulw!leid
81031'01:1d 92-1
Ls 31nou -moms
(L£160u) 92-101 SL-I
(0£ 16'6Z 16'8Z 16'£Z L601:1)
SL-1 01 (LEIS
(Z 26'9016'£01.6'ZO L6' L01601:1)
kieyy of ellouBeyy
(ti 1.Z6'E£ 16'Z006
L006'Z068'1069'L09901:1)
(AOH)100 01 ellou6eyy
Sl03f0ud L6 31110u
31V0 Ol Z861 ' lE Ain(' C13111%100 31V0 Ol NOI1V0011V NOIldI1:10930
S3H11110N3dX3 030N3 H1NON1 13Dcins d0 S1N3N1111W100 03ZI1:10H1f1V 103f0E1d
HOd 3af1110N3dX3 39V1N301:13d lVun10Vu1N00 NOISSIM100
31n01:1 AS 1u0d3u 1390n9
S1031'01:1d AVMHF 31:1nSV3101 0101:1
y 10 £ e6ed
Zen cao 6uipu3 .on snmS
089'Z58'96$
1.Z6'08E't/ L$
tr91'6L5'£ L$
LSL' 108$
£90'611$
£90'611$
M. ILL' VS
ES6'E8E'Z$
b69'9£9$
968'09L' l$
'sle6pnq Jean 1e0s11 Ol peleleJ Sou pue Ioeijuoatioefald 1e101 J01 WE semen IIV
9'o5Z J01 ensuodseJ OV9NVS (5)
10E4003 sumileO 10 Apo uolllod 0101:1 (V)
(ueol) wekoJd luewenoJdwl OI 01 Pe1e001Ie Mood pue L6 emu of peleoolle (mien WEDS eulwJelep of loefoJd OlOH (£)
.spun100£ 9S 10 e6essed Aq pampa] eq AeW (Z)
'sweJBOJd luewenOJdwl eBUegoiew! lsum6e ue01 (l) :310N
SZVEL5'Z$
%98
68£'Zl0'LZ1-$
L29'8ZE'Sli1.$
Sinai.
98£'Ll$
96001
S9£'ZZ9101.$
99£'ZZ9'1+1$
WEII:ammo*1V1019f#S
(Apo IIeH-ZHdL000 II VZZ6
EZZ6'6006'60Z6' L0Z6'50680H)
Z66'01-$
0/0001
09L'918'£3
09L'91.8'£1$
SIS03 dO/bOV 011S/UOPUIS
(OZZ6'9016' LZ060H)
£6£'9$
0/0001
5Z9' 908$
5Z9'508$
selpnlS
IIVH H31f1WW00
896' 10l$
9'6001
Win LEI
teaZ 18$
301H-N`7Fl3Vd'V1 IMS
(9EZ6
Jdwl'ZVOL000'01Z6' 11Z6'S0Z6'40Z6
'£OZ6'ZOZ6't0£ 16' LZ l6'b 1 l6'E 1160H)
896' 101$
0/0001
VL8'Z 18$
17Ln 18$
4NV1:1901:Id '1N30N1/301H-N-)IHVd
94l'99$
%56
t1-17'99610$
S09111,0'9$
WAS V NVId VIV1:1901=1d -111018i15
56ZI79$
%001
Z9£'6Z17'Z$
Z9£'6Z17'Z$
(L00601:1) VO/Ionuo3 BulddeVl
(OZ 16'0 116'L 10601:1)
0/0Z6
0179'099$
0817'9L9$
selpnl8 JopuJoO
(L0£6
6116'80 1.6'£ l06'0106'900601d)
1-Z9'£$
%86
Z179'969' L$
199'9E6' L$
se1Pn1S weJ60Jd
S301A1:13S V NVId VIVH901:1d
31V0 Ol
S3Hf1110N3dX3
Z661 ' LE AIrif
O30N3 H1NOW
HOd 3Hn110N3dX3
0311111100
139ane d0
3DV1N30H3d
31V0 Ol
S1N3W11WW00
1VHn10VH1N00
N011V0011V
03ZI1:10H1fIV
NOISSIWWOO
3111011 A911::10d3H 1390f19
S1031'0Eid AVMHOIH V 31:111SV3W 0101d
NOIldI1i0S30
103f0kid
b 10 ti e6ed
7.6/1E/Z0 Bu!Pu3 vpy Snarls
•sle6pnq mei( leosll of palelaa lou pue loe.luoopoafoad lelol a01 aye senlen IIV
•spun1008 asp a6essed Aq peonpai eq Auvi (Z)
•sweJ6oad l ewenwdwl e6ueyoialul lsup6e ueoi (L) aLON
30NV1VEI NV01 31V0 Ol 31V0 Ol
oNIONV1Sln0 S1N3W3Saf18W13d S3Hn110N3dX3
000`000`L L$
000`WO' LL$
MC000'1 L$
S"1d101
NVO-1 V1IIiIHf1YV -1d10111fi5
sluewenwdwl eBueye�elul
SLZ-1/51.-1 lueweei6V ueoi
V131HHn11 d0 JW0
Z881 'LE AIM'
030N3 H1NOW
HOd 31:If1110N3dX3
N011V0011V
03ZIdOH1nV
NOISSIWWOO
3111013 AEI 11:10d3H 13win8
S103P0Hd AVMHJIH V 3Hf1SV3W 010H
NOI1dI1i0S30
1031'OHd
]U( 'swalsRs euanewiJd (3)
31na3Hos Addwwns
Wd690dd 1WAOadWI 1dOdSNda1 d TYISd3W
R(� �(diauotsaliu
bblArOz 4siuil oaroud
tx di C.
ssa.boad
Je 7arcu
bBNtlfz l l5 i d
Ra"
aax
�'s'n'd
a'@0
.mg ( 1 (
NSSIWWOD N1dOdSNdal kmoo 30ISb3AId
sa�e4F�,saole,I11 Je:,S
zb�nd�z ajed
d21°D 13LHO3A
y yo t aaa45
fold
NOI100a15NO3
AVM 30 11-19Id 1
N
38Sd ONV N9IS3a 1VNI3 l
1V1N3WN0aIAN3 8 9NIa331,1I9N3 AdUNIWI13ad I
I(a3AIa 011,1I9Vr S)1NW9Vld3d MOIE NOSa30NVS bLla
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NIa3314I983 AaVNIWI13dd 1
1
S3NV1 1, 01 1,130IM -SIZI 01 1S 9 bLla
NOI100a1SN00 I
t
AVM 30 1H9Ia
38Sd ONV N9IS30 1VNIH
r I
I311V1
b 01 830IM - (SI8a3d NI)1S 9 01 1S H1L bLla
1V183100dIAN3 8 9NIa331,1I983 AaVNIWIl3ad 1
S3NV1 b Ol N3aIM - 1S H1L 01 SII W4
AVM 30 1H9Ia
38Sd ONV N9IS30 1VNI3
1VIN3WN0dIAN3 8 98Ia33NI9N3 AdUNIWIl3bd
I
5380 8 01 N30IM - SII 13r 01 AVM A311VA 0918
1 AVM 30 IH9Id
) ii d N I W I 1 3 d d
I 38Sd aNV N9IS311 1VNI3
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NId331,1I91,13 AaVNIWI13ad
0...........0
S3NV1 9 01 N30IM - 0A18 SONV103a 01 SIZI 0918
j 1 NOI100a19100
AVM 10 1 H 9 I a 1
A d d N I W I 1 3 d d
38Sd ONV N9IS30 1VNI3 I
1" l
N
1V1831,11,10aIAN3 8 9NIa331,1I9N3 MUNIWIl3ad
f
•
53NV1 9 01 N30IM-OI 5 2/lb/09 01 AVM A311VA 091d
1 NOI130d19100
AVM 30 1H9Id { 1
38Sd ONO 89IS30 1UNI3
1V1N3WNOHIAN3 8 9NId331,1I983 AdVNIWI13dd
398%0831NI 130d1S800 - a0 VWOA IV Slid
al N o S V r r Wt MI WI J f
of NI o 5 V r r i w H W 3 r
OWN[ 0 5 VLr r Wl u wj 3 r
Ol N o s al rI rf wl tI A r
a NI 0 sl V
N r w V w 3 r
a[ N 0 5(VTr rj w V w 31 r
a] N] o s V r r WI V 11 3 r
9bb l
Sbb l
1,66 E
Clab l
e661
l bb i
Obb l
31003HOS AddWWOS
Wdd00dd 1WAOddWI 1d0dSNdd1 d 3d0Sd3W
J. NSSIWWO0 N1dOdSNddl A1N00o 30ISHAId
At.i m 5eum at'I, d,o
all •swa}sRS eAnewLid l a 1
bblflfOZ ysiuy }aaroud
68NtlfZ }�e}S }aaroJd
zb�ndba aea1e0 fold
pano�ddd
paHaayd
uoisinaa
a}e4
.AS ssa,1cwd r 1 1
dNOD 131H038
.4.60ao1°""'" '
"ma ,t1,A3i�8 t•A.ns
1 1
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 1 9NIa33NI9N3 MUNIWI13dd
IAOH
Ol 3AO VI1ON9OW lbld
j 7
NVI03W - 1S AdVW
NOI100dISN00 1 1
1
AlNO NOIIVOI3Ild30
38Sd
AOH
AVM 30 1H9Id
ONO N9IS30 1VNI3 L
NVION - 1S NIVW 01 3NIl A1N000 39NVa0 lbla
NOI100dISN00
0
A1N0 NOI10I3I1d30 AVM 30
38Sd ONO N9I530 1UNI3
AOH NEON - 3AV VI1ON9VW
1H9Id . :
r
01 1S NIOW lbld
NOI100dISN00
I l
I
38Sd ONO N9IS30
N1 I,O1 N30IM-SSOdOd3A0 Nl00NI1/31dVW/HINS
1VNI3
lbld
(AdVNIW113dd1 NOI100d1SN00
1 1
99 3AV 01 Z8 3AV 981d
385d OW N9I530
AVM 30 1H9Id 1 1—
1VNI3 I
1
11 dI5I0 dI1VO A8 N3OIM -
(AdVNIWI13dd) NOI10OdISN00
385d
I 1
AVM 30 1H9I8
1 I
i
ONO N9IS30 1UNI3 1 ]
4
I11 81510 dllVO A8 N30IM - 8S 3AV 01 99 3AV 981d
NOI100d1SN00 1
ill
38Sd OW N9IS30
AVM
30 1H9Id 1 1
1VNI3 [ '
11 dISI0 dllVO A8 N30IM-8S 3AV 01 Od N011I0 981d
t03001ONI ION Id30 8 NOIlISIObOV1 AOM 30
lUINNNOdIAN3 1 9NIa331,1I9N3
1H9Id 1
1-�1
AdUNIWIl3dd I
1
S3NV1 b Ol N30IM - 1S IdOdM3N 01 IS d31111 bLld
( WIl3ad ) NOIDOHISN00
1 1
I
liiii
38Sd OW N9IS30
AVM 30 1H9Id 1
1VNIA [
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NIa33NI9N3
AdVNIWIlidd I
T 1
53NV1 b 01 1,130IM - 1S 151 Ol ddS NVW1I9 bild
O N O SlO f Twil1W Ar
O N1015 u[nr W V 41l3 r
arN df slu r r W V W 3j('
O N olskijr1rIWfVIW All
O N O SI+J
r rIw u W 3
r 0 N O{5 tf r r W O W131E
0 N10(S t1 r r WIO[W13f r
9bb1
Sbbl
bbbl
Ebb!.
Zbbl
l lbbl
Obbl
Jul 4swals65 euanewiud (o)
3 1 0 a 3 H 0 S A d d W W f 1 S
aarou
WUMOdd 1WAOddWI IdO6Ndal d 3dOSd3W
Flinl�tl �[Jirul
!AWN Hsiui3 d
sx[i,N ��ObEI
32r0J
panwddts_pavan
uoisinam
aed
MIREAIA
utu6i� eipij6wj I i
Z690tl1 a}e4 ele4lJel
NSSIWW00 N1d06NdaA1N000
,,Qax,5,,�s,
aleQlold
MOO 131H338
ctc 0.15Nol130alswo0
zbonw
I i
A d d N I W I 1 3 d d
AdM 30 1H9Ia OFF
1N3W3a000bd 2 NOIS30 1dNI3 1 __I
1d1NN NOHIAN3 8 9NIa33NI9N3 AadNIWIl3ad 1 I
NOI1d1S 31INOWII lIda a310WW00
NOI100a1SN03 I I
AdM 30 1H9Ia T
F 1
1N3W3a030ad B 149IS3a -MIA I
W I
(NOIld1S 1N3NdWa3d 30Ndad310 aIAN3 53a010NI) 1d1N3WN0aIAN3 8 9NIa33NI9N3 AadNIWI13Hd ]
1 NOI1d1S WId31NI NMO1NMOa lIda a31411400
1
ONO ( aSd) 1a0d3a Aa01S 13311ad I
I
I
1 Slz la NO S1N3W3A0adWI 39NdH0a31NI
I
ONO (aSd) 1a0d3a Aa01S 103rOad
1 lb Id NO S1N3W3A0ddWI 39NdH0a31NI
ONO ( aSd) 1dOad Aa015 133r0ad I
l 1
I09 ld NO S1N3W3A0adWI 39NdH3d31NI
4
A1N0 (aSd) 1a0d3a Aa01S 103r0ad f
r
1 OL la NO 51N3W3A0adWI 39NdH0a31NI
ONO ( aSd) 1a0d3a Aa01S 103rOdd li
1
580133NN00 35 2 SM - 5lZ/lb/09 39NdH0a31NI s[ela
1d1NNNOaIAN3 8 9N1a33NI9N3 AadNIWI13ad f
I
53NH1 8 01 N30IM - 139S 01 10r SlZ/093 Slela
ONO ( aSd) 1a0d3a Aa01S 133rOdd I f
1
I( SNOI1V301 9 ) 51N3W3A0adWI a00Iaa03 11118
I
ONO ( aSd) 1d0d3a A001S 103rOdd I !
1
1 9NIN30IM 30IS100 - SIZI Ol SLI lbla
1d1N3WN0aIAN3 2 9NIa33NI9N3 AadNIWIl3ad
9NIN30IM 3aIS100 - S[I 01 WAS lbla
NOI100a1SN00 I I
AlNO NOIld0I3I1a30 AUM 30 1H9Ia !
Ommommommmi
38Sd ONU N9I530 1UNI3
I' 1
AOH NdIa3W - 1S AbdW 01 3AV dI1ON9dW lbld
aTNT0sl1 r[rlWOIWI3r
aIN Osld rrlwHw ijr
OLOISKr rlwdwiriajNOIq(ir r wrilwlAr
ajNI0I5d
rjr[w}kijAraml-quir
rwdw ilr
OjNalsiu r riowrA
9bb[
Shbl
hbbl Ebb l
cbbl
lbbl
Mt _
PAGE NO. 1
08/27/92
CONTRACT
NUMBER
0007PT3
0007RA2
0007RA3
0008DC3
00081E12
0008183
00085111
0008SB2
0008SB3
000991
0009BP1
0009PT2
R08801
R08900
R08901
R08902
R08905
ROB907
ROB908
R09000
R09001
R09002
R09003
R09004
R09006
R09007
CONSULTANT FIRM
Several Specialized Transit Firms
COVERS SEVERAL FIRMS L CONSULTANTS
VARIOUS FIRMS, VENDORS TO RAIL RELATED PROJECTS
ICMA
COVERS SEVERAL FIRMS/CONSULTANTS/PERSONS
STANDARD INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Covers Several Firms/Consultants/Persons
COVERS SEVERAL PERSONS 8 PERS
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Covers Several Firms/Consultants/Persons
Covers Several Firm/Consultants/Persons
COVERS SEVERAL FIRMS/CONSULTANTS/PERSONS
RCTC/OCTC MOU (Environmental Studies)
Bechtel Corporation
Parsons Brinkerhoff, Wade and Douglas, Inc.
Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Runde end Douglas, Inc.
Schiermeyer Consulting Services
Route 86 Cooperative Agreement
City of Corona
Bechtel Corporation
NBS/Lowry
KeWes and Associates
J.F. Davidson Associates
Caltrans
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
PSOMAS
REPORT COMMIT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMITMENT LOG REPORT
Sorted by CONTRACT NUMBER
SCOPE OF WORK
AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL
RCTC COMMITTED TO COMMITTED TO AMOUNT
COND. BASE HONK EXTRA WORK COMITTED
Specialized Transit Claifas
RISC CHARGES RELATED TO RAIL
RISC EXPENCE RELATED TO RAIL,FENCES,OPERATING COSTS
DEFERRED COMP
INSURANCE (WC, LIFE, SHORT E LONG DISAB)
LIFELONG i SHORT TERM DISABILITY i WC INS
Salaries t Benefits
HEALTH i SALARY BENEFITS
HEALTH BENEFITS,EMPLOYEES REIMBURSEMENTS
Financial Services - Bond Interest
Bond Principal Repayment
PASS TNRU
Environmental Studies with the Keith companies
Project Management
Rt. 91 Conceptual Design Services
Rt. 91 Final design - converted to a lump sum contract
Commuter Rails Consulting Services
Construct 4 lane expressway at Rt. 86
Cooperative Agreement
Program Management
Final Design Svcs for Rt 91 bet. Serfas Club G Main St.
Professional end Technical Design Svcs for Rt 91
Right -of -Way Mapping for RT 60/91/215 IC
Agreement for Rt 60/91/215 IC
Planning and Support
Surveying Control
CB
DM
TH
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
MTM
LM
ML
KS
HS
MTM
ML
LM
ML
ML
LM
MTM
JR
WH
TOTAL
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
1500000.00 0.00 1500000.00 18000.00
500000.00 0.00 500000.00 317390.54
500000.00 0.00 500000.00 1116.40
48477.00 0.00 48477.00 2988.36
50000.00 0.00 50000.00 36636.38
34653.00 0.00 34653.00 2033.25
685479.00 0.00 685479.00 103546.19
112520.00 0.00 112520.00 117197.23
106488.00 0.00 106488.00 13403.83
1500000.00 0.00 1500000.00 0.00
10000000.00 0.00 10000000.00 0.00
472980.00 0.00 472980.00 0.00
79527.76 0.00 79527.76 65018.48
170000.00 0.00 170000.00 170000.00
2234275.00 80000.00 2314275.00 2040798.86
739000.00 0.00 739000.00 712188.27
558000.00 0.00 558000.00 365215.51
21035400.00 0.00 21035400.00 1210108.65
14605000.00 0.00 14605000.00 10061755.81
1291000.00 0.00 1291000.00 1059104.15
970338.00 12566.00 982904.00 976013.99
1458927.00 40077.00 1499004.00 1438388.76
8500.00 0.00 8500.00 8500.00
20000000.00 0.00 20000000.00 1500000.00
105000.00 0.00 105000.00 48269.59
2423242.75 260486.25 2683729.00 2437306.10
52'9010h 00'00005 00'0
61.'12E2L9 00'099992 00'0
51'92% 52 5r/OIE50L 15'001LEL
00'0699 00'0000L 00'0
56'26LEEL 00'00002I 00'0
6L'9629 00'00002 00'0
00'0E195 00'000000 00'0
6h'L6LE61. 00'201.251 00'9265,
9E'925E9f 96'ESL1I1 00'969SE
EL-L1EEEE 00'9695E£ 00'99L£4
96'291911 00'92E621 00'06EE2
52'9110/02 00'EO190S2 09'959952
12'LL,LOSL 00'000995L 00'00060L
52'915252 00'S60L09 00'0
00'0 00'0000095 00'0
ZE'ZE99992 00"/OLLL09 00'20912h
21'69£L69 ES1.150h5 00'E9694
21'992221 00',S£00 00'LLLLS
00'0 00'000009 00'0
00'0 00'00059 00'000E
OL'2529921 00'6909911 00'69605L
9h'92E1102 00'000000E 00'0
50'511665 00'00051.6 00'E£92LL
11'25026L 00'92129/ 00'9EZLE
96'2699991E 96'260999LE 00'0
59'225E9E 00'ELL9LL 00'1051.01.
00'00005
00'099992
L9'£009L6
00'0000L
00'0000Z
00'000009
00'92190E
96'LSh9LE
00'016L62
00'1E6551
02'99h6122
00'00062/1
00'560109
00'0000095
00'Z0L959E
ES'955161
00'22119E
00'000009
00'00029
00.00L562L
00'000000E
00'295209
00'0/60E1
96'260999LE
00'229929
MN
SOX
SOX
Mr
H1
Mr
SN
HM
AN
H1
011
AA
Nl
Nr
SA
HM
ON
H1
H1
H1
HI
SX
SOX
0Hr
NO
HM
SNO11V11093N 3SV31 3019-N-XNVd 31V11093N
62 a1no9 Jo; SO3OJOS 6ulJaaul6u3 AJeulallaJd
ROAM MINI 62 'IN S3AS 'NONIAN3 7 '9N3 NIl3Nd
uollsa6uo3 anallaJ of sallllpe; Nau Jo; paw ayl Apn1S
NV990Nd 1N3N39VNVW NOI1S39NO3 30 1N3Nd013A30
1300N 3IAJVH1 NVSAIN NOJ VIVO +OMAN 7 '0'3'S/31VOW1
L6-19 311 93IJpaJA/Ae0 „ueol„ 3uaranoJdNI a6ueyoJelul
9N113AMS 013IA 9N1dd+ 12 31009
S371AN3S A3AHNS 01311 7 9NIddVW L6 310011
N31N1-VIl01MJVN/L6 31110V NO S33IA93S 9NIN33N19N3 311JV61
30IM 03W 1131N1 SWOONS-9W 1611! S371AN3S 1V1N3NNONIAN3
9NIN33NI9N3 ANVNINIIIId I6 310011
IN3N39VNV11 9N I N33N 19113
313H 001 AGMS 11V11 N31fM103 11110393d
ase4d 3umodolan90 12afoJd AJsulmllsJd
SU 1 303/3f;;aJ1/leluacuoJou3/6upaaul6u3 AJsuINI1N3d
Apn15 JANAJo2 021efeN
Apn17 JopIJJoO LLl '3N Jo; sa3IAJOS 6uIJ9auIDU3 3I;;9J1
uoll3aSJa1u1 '1S ZOJad - 0801) uol3onJIN007 ILL '3V
(ueel) NSd 90a199 51-1 Jo; u rm+, an mJadoo2
6upaaul6u3 3!33N31 VVda
voM 6 aseld pug 2'0 ase4d - 12 '3V
(336foJd uosJapueS) lus ea36V am madoo3
(Vd0 Aprils loweemoiou3
71 512/L6/09 Jo; paJn7o3d MAN Jo; sae; a13I1 pus NoJ393
voM 6ulAaAANS SLZ '39
030N303 031111103 )INOM V91X3 +OM 3S19 '011003
MOW 1NOONV 01 03111NN07 01 03111+03 313H
11101 1V101 11610111 1N11011V
ANON A0 3d03S
N38W0N 17VVINO3 AN p01307
1110d311 901 1N3N11NN07
NOISSINN03 NO11V1NOdSN191 A1N003 301SN3AIN
11N1103 IN0d3N
S371AN3S NOIIV1NOdSNVN1 ONVINI
•ouI 'SJaauI6u3 )00 lelwaluaa
3900W 7 S31420
SINN3d JO A113 (S3IVI3OSSV 7 N3AON9 '31HOM) 29N
'30SSV 9NINNVId 7 H7NV3S39 A311VA
'1d30 9NINNVd 11NI103 301SN3AIN
A311VA ON3NON A113
9NIN33N19N3 X31N
S3110170SSV 7 3110N
S3IVIOOSSV ONV Nor
S311I30SSV 7 993M1 V 1N39111
ONI '113N13119
uollaJodJo3 loupes
SN33N19N3 N3SOfINV-NOSINNON
(SU 1V) WOWS/313V
7 spine ;;ovalula suolJed
99I101W4391 0 7 d
293e13089V 43IES Jn41IM
A3I3 19313a4303
/ aplsJaA19 ;o Aluno3
sel6no0
saleposeV 41I91S Jn41IM
salopossV pug s)10
opJad ;o A313
aplsJamm ;o Aluno3
VSl
am 1 00113143
AJNoI/59N
NV11 1N1111OSNO3
£LL60N
ZLL60N
141.6011
01160N
60L60V
00160V
L0160N
901.6021
SOL60N
EOL6ON
Z016011
LOLOON
00160H
1206011
02060V
91O60N
L1060N
9L060N
51060V
110609
E1060N
210609
L106011
010609
600609
1100609
N391N1N
1311N1NO3
26/L2/90
2 'ON 39Vd
991 5019 00'0EL£ll 00'0 00'0EL£11
9L'959S9 00'51/L6 00'0 00'51L16
L9'0.61L1 00'5526/1 00'0 00'5526/1
91'59009 91'59009 00'0 91'59009
50'09012L1 00'00005/1 00'0 00'00005a
LE'LZZ101. 00'00/091 00'0 00'001991
02'0961115 00'L wni 00'LL909h 00'0109909
00'0 00'0000051 00'0 00'0000051
06'161001 06'16/001 00'0 06'16/901
1,1'9ELhh1 02'£h96/1 02'5L995 00'09116E
15'2096/ 00'11110h 00'61E25 00'26L9h£
92'£965511 £9'2526LL1 00'0002E2 £9'252L951
9£'51929£ 00'95095/ 00'00009 00'95096£
S£'16h102 00'090125 00'9E0/92 00'2£2952
92'1LL611 00'2E/151 00'00002 00'2ELh£1
16'909902 00'2LL922 00'00052 00'211102
LO'9119L£ E1'056919 0L'11h09 EL13L19E5
Lh'905ES£ 00'01116 00'211L1 0011219h
00'0206L 00'0206L 00'0 00'02062
OL'6LLL9 00'00SLIL 00'0 00'005/11
L11161562 001,E06L£ 00'5E/91 00'96229E
Z9'£06£h1 00'105991 00'60612 00'565911
9£'£52612 00'99E£ZZ 00'£L292 00'E11161
5619659h2 05'60E9L£ 00'1006/ 05'522L2£
19'14h99L 00'h9951£1 00190911, 00'9501h11
6f1311£1 00'00052 00'0 00'00052
MN
MN
MIN
ONr
NO
MN
IN
IN
H1
ONr
ONr
IN
IN
IN
IN
HM
ON
MW
ar
QS
H31
031
HM
NM
MN
38M 901880M 51030153V 801 908d 11801S 831110 100d0VA
38M 901880M 8 9NIAIl S10301538 80i 3A1103301 311VHS30111
NV1908d 3A1103301 38VH5301N 1611 39V0VN
31IS 1V1S 11V8 NH03-50011V911S3AN1 ANV0I0I131d II 3SVNd
103N39Y0VN NV0908d
01111I 7 N91S30'3NOHN010N $01
Ydr 1SN03 33N 9VW-NIVN 1610 AON 1SN03
S1Z-I NO 30 390111SV3 1SN03 3389V d0-03
1b15 30 30V03001d d0 1S03 00113f1N1SN03 103N3389Y d0-03
Sl-1 01 14111 NA 1611 90103301903 31JAV11
90I0IM 30151N10 1610 103NSS3SSV 1Y103N10NIAN3
100d3H 133r01d/90113301903 ANVNINIl3Nd
16111 9NO1V S390V03031N1 SalSd
512/0985 9001V 390V0313101 SOISd
011 7 1611S NO A0n1S rO1d VOA SASS 903
090S NO 0)83101 S110d38 A0n1S r01d 101 90103301903
111-0'0 Nd NOVA 16 11 99IA3AIMS
hL 311101 VOA S331A13S 1V'N3NN011AN3
103143309V 3SV31 101 3011 7 MIMI
SISAIVNY S3A11VN1311V - A0111S A111101SV31
1300N NVSAIH 103N083A00 AO 30SSV V3 083111NIOS 01 'SISSY
6L 31n011 (S133r01d OM1) NO 90113301903 311AV11
IL wolf (s3oofoJd E) u0 S031AJOS IUIJODU 6u3 o me31
6L 3lnOV 90IddVW 1Y11910 7 90IA3AtInS
hL 31(ION 9010330191E AVVNINI138d
S110310389V 3SV31 3018-0-80Vd 31V11093N
0300303 03111000 ANON V8113 AHOM MVO '0003
1NIOWV 10nOWV 01 03111+03 01 031111/107 313V
1V101 1V101 10110WV 10110NV
ANOM AO 3d03S
N3ININ 13V11003 Ao pews
180d38 901 10301111I103
NOISS1WW33 NOI1V'10dSNV11 A1N103 30ISH3A11
1I01103 180d31
NV/1908d RA1103301 100d0VA
NV8908d 3A1103301 301SN3A11 NN31S3M
NV2190Nd 3AI103301 AVM331A 301SN3A18
'301 0331 V8131
'301 11A13 '13111330
'301 'S3SI1d031N3 000111331A
(SN11111V3) NOI1V1NOdSNV81 A0 1036110Vd30
301S113AIH 10 A113
V001103 i0 A113
S31Y130SSV 7 HNr
'3N1 '531111305SY VSl
531111305SY OW S3+8
ANVd1103 7 13111V3 M3130
1110 NZN3
S113019113 13SIV7 A31
'301 Sl0V1105003 SNV'
'30I 901A3ANnS 1SV03
'301 '330313S 9111113301903
NV010 NVA '3 OIVN00/A11S83AINM VONII VNOI
(9VIIIVS) S1830N13A09 OSSV 00101VN83I NVS
531V1305SV ONV AHr
'301 '90113301903 3ANOA
•d303 6813asu!Su3 30Pn1
S31VI305SY ONV 15011 NVIIIIM '0130 11300V
11VH113003N 7 NOSNNOr 'NNVN '13INV0
'301 'S31V130SSV ONV10V9/SN3A31S
/0260N
E026011
20260V
10260E
002600
h£1600
EE1601
ZE16o8
1£160H
0£160N
62160M
921608
L21601
921601
52160V
121601
E21601
22160N
121601
0216011
611608
911601
L1L601
9146011
511601
111.6011
11111 111V11nSN03
83011111
13YN1NO3
Z6/L2/90
'ON 39Vd
00'890£1 00'00119 00'0 00'00119 MN
00'26£5 00'00051 00'0 00'00051 83
2L'hOh6£1 h6'1hL5L7 00'0 h61hLSL7 AN
51'961572 Sl'961572 00'0 SL'9615hZ 90
00'0 h6'2LOS52 00'000052 h611LOS Qlf
00'0 00'59Z77 00'SLLS 00'06h8£ SN
S8'60111 00'00BZL 00'0691 00'01111 SA
8h'9169 00'00001 00'0 00'00001 H1
00'00001 00'00001 00'0 00'00001 Ma
SL'£ZLSL 00'00002 00'0 00'00002 Ha
00'09LBSW 00'000£L61 00'0 00'000£L61, NO
92'11SZL 00'00002 00'005L£ 00'005BLL 01If
02'9L022 00'1995Lh 00'29£051 00'66Z52£ H1
71'59L05 00'065092 00'066££ 00'0099ZZ H1
SZ'LOZB£L 00'000008 00'0 00'000008 NO
16'£L8L£L 00'0000,2 00'0 00'0000,Z NO
09'590L6£ 00'000007 00'0 00'00000V NO
07'00£96£9 00'L1256971 00'0 00'LL2h69,1 SA
00'6hL79h1 00'00002661 00'0 00'00002661 WIN
LL'LOOLh1 00'OL66h1 00'Z£992 0011£££ZI SD
71'9Z09 00'0000Z 00'0 00'0000Z MN
89'11152 00'7918L 00'56101 00'696L9 HM
OS'66h£LES S5'56695£01 00'0 5S'56695£01 NO
82'SZ£8Z 00'00962 00'SL8£ 00'SZL52 SA
2L'h£0£L 00'SZh51 00'002/ 00'SZ211 SN
91'56601 00'000SL 00'0 00'000SL MN
a01Va3d0 13V81NO3 loodS08 O1 A015811S 100dS08
S331Aa3S IIVH VO1 NVId N0I1Va931N1 11SNVal
LLL la aoi A3Aans 31HdV1190dV1
651-8 1N31433a9V 31VS3a 7 NOIIISIIID3V MOS 33NVAUV
S331Aa3S 1V1N3NNOSIAN3 11V3 NO
133f0ad 3A0adN1 Slaa3d 10 1113 7L1a/3A0adNl NOI1110N30
133rOad 3A011d141 Slaa3d 10 A113 7L111/31V8V SO1S38SV
a0 own SV11135 9NI1JVa0 7 N91S30
A11a931Ni lYaf113(la1S 1101 9018 N1131S3M 3NIa3A1OM 133dSN1
5311a3d0ad NOS119S3J 13A30 1101 SASS 1N1111I1SN03
11Va and rob
NOIIVIS IIVS 1911118103 NMO1NM00 5331Aa3S 1V1N3NNOVIA113
ILL la Ida A01115 133rOad i0 NOI1VIIVd3ad
S133P0ad 09 31110a 9N1a33H19N3 31AJVal
1V931 111113N39
Aa051A0V 1V13NVNli
IIV11 'a3dVd 1V3183NM03'1V931
3NI1 AINIIO3 39VN110 01 NIVN 161a AOH AO 1SN03
BS 3AV-N01110 98111 IN3N39VNVW 1SN03
ASVN-9VN 9N101M NV10311 AOH 161a SA35 1V3INN331039
03 39NVa0 01 3VVHS30111 a31SO4 01 POad 1V133dS NINON OMl
N311103ad 1V 301a 7 llaVd A311VA ON3VON a01 37Sd
N31SAS IIVa a3101MD3 d0 NOIIVa1SININV 7 1N3NNSI18V1S3
S1N3N3A0Vall i0 N01111ON30
1N3N31VIIV SO1S38SV
S91N 1101 0001 311M 9VA3 NI 91N 9NINSOM13N AlH1N011
030N3dN3 03111NO3 NVOM Va1x3 NSOM 3SV8 '011003
mow 1N11(NIY Ol 03111NN03 Ol 0311114403 313E
1V101 1V101 ',mow 1Nf10NV
/ISOM d0 3d03S
a381a1N 13V111NO3 Aq Po3Jo5
(S13) S331/0135 NOI1VIVOdSNV111 1131NN03
'3NI NO111WVH 7 N311V Z000
'3NI '51133N19N3 NIAAVf
SNVa11V3
(V8N) S31V130SSV NVNONVa8 13VH31N
5331Aa35 1V1N3NNOSIAN3 ONV13A313
1V1N3NNOVIAN3 131N1
51133N1983 S31V130SSV 7 1131131d
S31V130SSV NOSII3N NOSNHOP
'3NI S31V130SSV 7 NO1SaVN a3SA3N
31111 A111V110
'3NI 1NV1111SN03 1V1N3NNOSIAN3 '1V3N 3NNOAA
AIMDI/SON
S31VI30SSV H11NS swum
V3931111 7 1538 1530
5311Ia1133S a3d143N
5a3AN 7 AN3A131110
(SNVa1lV3) NOI1VISOdSNVa1 AO 1N3N1aVd30 VIN1101I1V3
LL 131111510 SNVa11V3
'3NI 'S31V130SSV 7 NO1N9131
(100d5118) SI18 9N113)111VN 311VHS30111
Aa1101/S8N
(Vaa3S) AllaDHl v IIVS 1VN01938 VlNaodl1V3 Na3HUIDS
1V1N3NDSIAN3 D31N1
1V1N3NNOSIAN3 N31N1
Sa00N3A SI101aVA N9Il0aN1 S13
MUM 901 1N3N11NN03
NOISSINN03 NOI1VISOdSNVa1 AINIID3 301S113Ala
1110103 Ia0d311
MIA 1NV1111SN03
9£260a
S£Z60a
h£260a
BZZ60a
LZZ60a
9ZZ60a
SZZ60a
7ZZ60a
£2Z6oa
ZZ260a
LZ260a
OZZ60a
6126011
MUMS
L1260a
9126011
0.26011
h1260a
£1z60a
ZL260a
1126011
0126011
602600
L0Z60a
90260V
SOZ60a
a38NIN1
131111NO3
26/LZ/80
b 'ON 39Vd
92'59£6£9611 ZL'9£91LL242 64'794Z01h £Z'25£6999£2
00'55ZZ 00'00001 00'0 00'00001 N1
L6'LOZ65 00'000h9K 00'0 00'000,901 Nl
00'000002 00'000059 00'0 00'000059 N1
aplsAo616 ;o A3l] Jo; SullInsuo3 auluusld
1030139VNVN 133f0Vd
30NVN31131NI 36180 VNf1A
03003dX3 03111003 VNOR 191183 8110R 3SV9 '08003
1Nnowv 1Nf10MV 01 0311114403 01 031110003 3138
1V101 1V101 1Nf1011V 1N10NV
AMOR 10 3d03S
nom 13V81003 A0 083.10S
ws lelol ��•
sa]sPossV uospinea •r r LO£6o1
N011VNOd1103 1310336 00£608
03800 10 A113 L£26011
180d38 901 10301118103
NOISSINNO3 N011V1804SNV81 A10003 3015113AIN
1101803 180d38
0811 1NV11051103 ma N1
13VO1NO3
rJ
Z6/LZ/90
'ON 39Vd