HomeMy Public PortalAbout11 November 4, 1992 Budget & Finance053777
RIVERSIDE COUNTY' TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
(COMMISSIONERS RUSS BEIRICH, KAY CENICEROS,
CORKY LARSON, PAT MURPHY)
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1992
g:...;......:.........:
LUND & GUTTRY
39-700 BOB HOPE DRIVE, THE BOB HOPE BUILDING, SUITE 309
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
4. PUBLIC HEARING - DRAFT 1992 MEASURE A 1TRATEGIC FINANCIAL PLAN UPDATE.*
The Commission will conduct a public hearing at its November 12, 1992 meeting for the
purpose of soliciting comments from the public on the Draft Strategic Financial Plan.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission, at their November 12th meeting, hold a public hearing and discuss for
possible action.
5. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
5A. AMENDMENT NO. 2 T9 CONTRACT RO-91-22 TO ENGINEERING SCIENCE FQR A
RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT FOR THE ROUTE 74 PROJECT. •
Staff Recommendation
To authorize staff to develop, and the Executive Director to execute, Amendment No.
2 to Contract RO-91-22 in the amount of $15,060 for a Relocation Impact Report for
the Route 74 project. A standard contract amendment will be used and reviewed by
Legal Counsel.
Page 3
,udget and Finance Committee Agenda
.ovember 4, 1992
6B. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INTEGRATED TRANSIT
PLANNING PROCESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND COORDINATION OF NEW
TRANSIT SERVICES IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COU"rY.
Staff Recommendation
To circulate a request for proposal from qualified consulting firms to conduct a study
that will develop a process for the Commission to use to make funding decision for
new transit service and to improve service delivery through greater coordination or
consolidation in the Western Riverside County area with a budget not -to -exceed
$70,000.
7. AMENDMENT TO CONTRACTS WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE CONSULTANTS TO PERFORM
DUE DILIGENCE AUDITS FOR ACQUISITION OF RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND COMMUTER
RAIL STATION SITES FROM THE ATSF RAILWAY (SANTA FE).
Staff Recommendation
To approve $150,000 to perform the additional Phase 1 and Phase 2 Hazardous Waste work
for the Santa Fe and Union Pacific Rail lines and authorize the Executive Director to execute
the amendments to the contracts with the previously "approved" Hazardous Waste consultants
for the work, subject to Legal Counsel review. The total not -to -exceed amount for "approved"
hazardous waste consultants would be $400,000.
8. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORTS.'
Staff Recommendation
Receive and file.
9. PROPOSAL FOR BONDING TRANSACTION.
Staff Recommendation
For discussion and possible action.
10. CLOSED SESSION - if necessary.
11. ADJOURNMENT.
`Routine end/or previously discussed items.
MINUTES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1992
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Commissioner Russ Beirich called the Budget & Finance Committee meeting to order at 10:30
a.m. at the offices of Lund & Guttry, 39-700 Bob Hope Drive, The Bob Hope Building, Ste.
309, Rancho Mirage, CA.
Members Present:
Russell Beirich
Corky Larson
Pat Murphy
Others Present:
Keith Curry, Professional Financial Management
Dean Martin, RCTC Controller
Mark Massman, Measure A Project Manager
Jack Smith, City Manager, City of Murrieta
Jack Reagan, Executive Director
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
M/S/C to approve the minutes of the September 2, 1992 Budget & Finance Committee as
presented.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
There were no public comments.
4. PUBLIC HEARING.
This item was pulled from the agenda as the newspaper notice had not been prepared in time
for publication.
5. QUARTERLY ECONOMIC REPORT SPONSORSHIP.
M/S/C to approve a one-year sponsorship ($8,500) of the Quarterly Economic Report.
°age 3
,dget and Finance Committee Minutes
October 7, 1992
7B. AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO PBQ&❑ CONTRACT.
M/S/C to: (1) Extend the Parsons contract by $756,186 which is $325,738 over and
above the amount that is currently available from the existing extra work and that an
additional $150,000 be maintained in extra work for future scope changes to the
contract. The total revised commitment to the PBQ&D contract will be $4,946,281
with an additional $150,000 of contingency; (2) Direct staff to renegotiate the present
75/25 percentage split between RCTC and SANBAG for a split of 80/20 (+/-) 2%;
(3) Concur with staff's, FHWA's, and Caltrans' decision to follow option 2A for future
improvement of the portion of 1-215 between East Junction with Route 60 and West
Junction with Route 60 as availability of funding and other priorities permit; and (4)
Provide policy direction to staff to assist in keeping the project focused on delivery of
an alternative that is within the funding limits of the Measure Program.
8. COMMUTER RAIL.
8A. UNION PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION THROUGH RIVERSIDE.
M/S/C to authorize addition of barrier construction on Dewey Street between Brockton
and Palm Avenue in Riverside to the list of approved construction on the UPRR line and
make available to the SCRRA an additional $25,000 for construction.
8B. COUNTY ASSISTANCE WITH THE RELOCATION OF RESIDENTS ON THE PIERCE
STREET PROPERTY AND REQUEST FOR CONTRACTS FOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
AND DEMOLITION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE PIERCE AND CRIDGE STREET
!PORTER) PROPERTIES.
M/S/C (1) To approve solicitation of bids for asbestos abatement work and demolition
of improvement work for the Pierce Street Property with the contracts being awarded
to the lowest bidder for each type of work. Also, to authorize a total budget of
$10,000 for the Asbestos Abatement and $30,000 for the demolition of improvements
and authorize the Executive Director to execute contracts for the work; subject to
Legal Counsel review; and (2) That the construction contract with Herzog Construction
be amended to include the demolition of improvements for the Cridge Street property.
A maximum of $25,000 will be allocated to SCRRA to cover the additional
construction expenses for the demolition work for the Cridge Street property.
8C. SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT (AMENDMENT #1) FOR YVONNE M. NEAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUL TA NT TO COMPLETE THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR
THE DOWNTOWN RIVERSIDE COMMUTER RAIL STATION (RCTC AGREEMENT #RO-
92201.
M/S/C to direct staff to develop and authorize the Executive Director to implement an
amendment to Contract R090220 in the amount of $25,000 for the additional work
identified in the staff memorandum. This will bring the total not -to -exceed value of the
contract to $235,000; subject to review by Legal Counsel.
AGENDA ITEM #4
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: November 4, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Office Services Manager
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - 1992 Draft Measure A Strategic Financial Plan Update
The Riverside County Transportation Commission, at its August 12, 1992 meeting,
directed staff to schedule the draft Plan for the Coachella Valley Association of
Governments (CVAG) and Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
review and recommendations, and solicit comments. In addition, the Commission has
determined to hold a public hearing on the draft Plan.
To date, Commission staff received comments from the Riverside Transit Agency
(RTA) and the WRCOG. CVAG has reviewed the Plan and CVAG staff has indicated
that their comments will be forwarded to Commission staff next week. Comments
received and staff responses to the comments will be included in the Commission's
agenda for their November 12th meeting.
As required, a notice of public hearing on the 1992 Draft Measure Strategic Financial
Plan Update for November 12th was published in the newspaper.
Staff Recommendation
That the Commission, at their November 12th meeting, hold a public hearing and
discuss for possible action.
nk
AGENDA ITEM #5A
DATE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
November 4, 1992
TO: Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
FROM: Mike Davis, Environmental Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Contract RO-91-22 to Engineering Science for a
Relocation Impact Report for the Route 74 Project.
Work has proceeded on the Route 74 environmental document and project report. Most
of the engineering work has recently been completed, work is now focusing on the
environmental impact analyses. The extent of potential business and housing relocations
have been identified for each of the alternatives. Caltrans Right -of -Way has requested that
a detailed Relocation Impact Report (RIR) be completed in support of the project
estimate. This work was not included in the original contract scope approved for
Engineering Science (E-S), the environmental consultant for the project (initial project
thinking was that relocation activities would be very limited).
Per staff request, E-S has submitted a proposed scope of work (attached) to perform the
RIR for the Route 74 Improvement Project (Lake Elsinore to Perris) as requested by the
Caltrans District 8 Right -of -Way Department. The $15,060 requested added scope will
require the development of Amendment No. 2 to the contract. Implementation of
Amendment No. 2 will increase the total approved value of the contract from $419,370
to $434,430.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To authorize staff to develop, and the Executive Director to execute, Amendment No. 2
to Contract RO-91-22 in the amount of $15,060 for a Relocation Impact Report for the
Route 74 project. A standard contract amendment will be used and reviewed by Legal
Counsel.
MD:sc
ES
ENGINEERING -SCIENCE, INC.
ADDRESS MAIL TO: STREET ADDRESS:
P O BOX 7056 199 S. LOS ROBLES AVE
PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91109 PASADENA. CA 91101
Tel: (818) 585-6000
Fax: (818) 585-6336
September 15, 1992
Mr. Jack Reagan
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, California, 92501
Attention: Mike Davis
Subject: Project 1 Relocation Impact Report Route 74 Environmental Studies
(R09122)
Dear Mr. Reagan:
This letter serves as a request to increase authorized funds for the subject
contract for preparation of the Relocation Impact Report for Route 74 Project 1.
After considering the relocation activities that will be conducted on the project,
Caltrans District 8 Right -of -Way Services recommended preparation of a
Relocation Impact Report in a meeting on July 30, 1992.
A Relocation Impact Report is prepared for complicated projects and/or special
problems projects. The level of discussion in this report is more detailed than in a
Relocation Impact Statement. According to Caltrans, the following reasons warrant
preparation of a Relocation Impact Report.
■ The study area generally consists of low-income housing which may be
difficult to relocate if there is a lack of comparable replacement area in the
immediate project area.
■ The project will directly and indirectly displace mobile homes.
■ Housing prices in areas such as the Cities of Ferris and Lake Elsinore may
be too expensive to serve as replacement areas since the median housing
prices in those cities are generally much higher than the immediate project
area
■ A Last Resort Housing may be required if no comparable replacement area
is found in the immediate project area. This will require payments to
potential displaced residents and businesses that exceed basic program
compensation expenditure limits.
■ Zoning laws in the project area may restrict relocation of businesses in the
immediate project area.
A PARSONS COMPANY
OLE'613, 09019 l 0le. VOL,
1S0018301
L8Z' Z l 0 LEO' Z l E 139loid
OEE'98 0 OEE'98 Z 1oekud
ESL'OZE 09019l 869.90E 11000ud
gaol mem! 6upspq load
090'9l 008' L 09Z' l 000'3l woo mol
60Z'Z LIZ S8l 09L' l uoddnS "sr
LZZ'S VZ9 LEP 09 VP uelpluUlel 'E
PZ019 OZL KS 008't► II Is11ue1os •uPd 'Z
909' L Z6l PE l 09Z' L I isliueaS •uud • L
Iglol S000 Seed del 4svl
9L l ZE tP9 P9 91 moil Iuol
Pt, 8 9l 9l t► sdew'g lxel wedem •tp
Pt 8 9l 9l t► E18a olwouo0eoao$ eIWO '£
UV 8 9l 9l t• 8190 elgis3 MOH e01100 •Z
VP 8 9l 9 l V Aeiun$ plead Lonpuo0 • L
IElol UoddnS Wel II 'PS 'uud I 'PS •uud )Isel
11:10d3u 10VdWI N011V00131:1
L 103rOud VL amou
DATE:
TO:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 'TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
November 4, 1992
Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
FROM: Karl Sauer, Measure A Project Coordinator
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Measure A Cooperative Agreement with the City of Corona for the
McKinley Street Interchange Project on Route 91
In August, 1989, RCTC gave conceptual approval (Agenda Item 12-E), to develop a
Cooperative Agreement with the City of Corona to: (1) Use Measure A Route 91
funds to revise the project design for improvements to the McKinley Street
Interchange to accommodate the future Measure A improvements to Route 91; and
(2) Forward Measure A Route 91 funds; equal to the difference required to construct
improvements to accommodate the future Measure A Improvements to Route 91, to
the City of Corona for the construction of the McKinley Street Interchange Project.
The basis for approving this funding was to avoid rework or throw -away cost (two
separate widening projects on the same bridge structures) for future Measure A
improvements on Route 91. This was part of the package of project improvements
which included Measure A participation in the Promenade, Smith, Maple, and Lincoln
overcrossings.
From August 1989 till now, Staff has been continually working with the City of
Corona and Caltrans in the development of the McKinley Street Interchange Project.
The final project design is almost complete with Caltrans Approval scheduled for the
end of the year.
At this point, the City of Corona is well along with development of improvements to
the McKinley Street Interchange on Route 91. These improvements will include the
addition of two new ramps and the subsequent widening of the McKinley Street
Undercrossing Structure, on one side, to accommodate one of the new ramps. Design
work has been ongoing since 1988 but is essentially completed now with construction
scheduled to start in the spring of 1993.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
T 0 : ;�►
FROM:
nark T. Massman, Measure A Project Managery��r�7
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Measure A Cooperation with the City of Corona on the
Promenade Overcrossing and McKinley Interchange
Projects on Route 91.
The City of Corona is well along with development of a new
overcrossing at Promenade and addition of new ramps along with
widening the freeway bridge at McKinley in the City of Corona.
These projects are funded through a special assessment district.
Design work has been essentially completed and construction will
proceed following approval of the Project Reports by Caltrans.
Caltrans has not approved the Project Reports due to problems
with the project concept. Recent discussions with the City of
Corona these their
hrojects consultant,
notr fu fully ry and compa compatible lwith, have
and shown
our future
that t p
plans for Route 91.
The completed design for the Promenade Overcrossing will
accomodate our present two lane project on Route 91 but will not
accomodate the future additional two lanes identified in Measure
A (as will the projects at Smith, Maple, and Lincoln on which we
are already cooperating with the City of Corona). In order to
avoid a significant and almost certain future cost of replacing appears
this overcrossing with our future Route 91 project, it
prudent to step in, using Route 91 Measure A funds, and cause
is overcrossing to be redesigned and constructed to accomodate
our plans for Route 91.
At McKinley, new east and west bound exit ramps are being added
with a new east bound loop access ramp. In order to accomodate
the loop ramp, the southerly freeway bridge is being widened to
accomodate an access ramp lane. Our second project on Route 91
will require an additional lane. It is not cost effective nor
desirable from a traffic interference perspective to have two
separate bridge widening construction projects on the same
be
bridge. ad is proposed hepro ct to widen heat Measure A Route br idgelfunds to accomodate the
used to add to the project
ultimate plans for Route 91.
We have discussed these concepts with the City of Corona staff
and have general agreement that this is desirable,
althougthat
Corona has made it clear that these are priority projects
can not be delayed. In order to accomplish this we need
Ctomove
quickly. A new Cooperative Agreement with they Corona the follow ins
necessary and would include as a starting point
points: Agenda Item 1'-F
Aunust 2, 1089
Riverside County Transportation Commission
AGENDA ITEM #5C
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COM: IISSION
November 4, 1992
Budget & Finance Committee
Administration Committee
Karl Sauer, Measure "A" Project Coordinator
Jack Reagan, Executive Director
Amendment to Contract RO-93-02 with Greiner, Inc. for Final Design
PS&E Engineering Services Consultant Agreements for the Route 79,
Gilman Springs Road Grade Separation
At the present time, there are two Measure A Highway Improvement Projects on
Route 79 between Beaumont and the San Jacinto/Hemet area. The first project is the
Sanderson Avenue Bridge Project which will widen the existing two lane road to four
lanes from the Ramona Expressway to Gilman Springs Road and will also provide for
an all weather bridge crossing over the San Jacinto River. This project would also
relocate, realign and signalize the Gilman Springs/Sanderson Avenue Intersection. This
project is scheduled to start construction in the summer of 1993. The second project
is the Lamb Canyon Widening Project which will widen the existing two lane road to
four lanes from Gilman Springs Road to First Street in the City of Beaumont. This
project is scheduled to start construction in the summer of 1994. Greiner, Inc. is
designing both projects under contract to Riverside County and RCTC respectively.
At the time of project inception of the Sanderson Avenue Bridge Project, the idea of
a grade separation at the Gilman Springs Road/Sanderson Avenue Intersection was
proposed but rejected due to budget constraints. Recently, Ca!trans has applied for
and received approval to expend up to $5.0 Million of HB1 "Safety Improvement"
Program funds for construction of a grade separation at the Gilman Springs - Route
79 intersection.
Staff and Caltrans agree that it would be optimal to construct the grade separation
project at the same time as the Sanderson Bridge and Route 79 construction. At staff
request, Greiner has completed a study to determine the cost benefits that would be
accrued through simultaneous construction of the project. The attached study
concludes that at a minimum the cost savings to the Route 79 project funded by
Measure A is estimated to by more than $1.1 million and more than $ 2.6 million for
the combined projects primarily due to balancing of excavation and fill and elimination
of throw away cost for reconstruction of the at -grade Gilman Springs intersection.
Greiner
GILMAN SPRINGS GRADE SEPARATION
REASONS FOR IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION
t
1. Cost savings to use Lamb Canyon excavated material (less than disposal cost of off-ste
location and saves purchase of future fill material).
RCTC 250,000 C.Y. @ $2.00 = $500,000 DisposalISavings
Caltrans 250,000 C.Y. @ $6.00 = $1,500,000 Fill Purchase
2. Improves coordination/blending of the Lamb Canyon and Sanderson designs without
added costs of future rework.
(RCTC savings = $Unknown) i
3. To reduce the potential rework required the Sanderson !construction could be
terminated south of the bridge site and Gilman Springs Road not realigned. This
would save $3 million in Sanderson construction costs but also lose $600,000 in State
reimbursement (20% of cost).
RCTC Savings = $600,000
4. Improving the intersection and realigning Gilman Springs Road (without signals) would
increase the safety problem, due to widening Sanderson, and still require rework of the
Sanderson profile. It reduces the lost State reimbursement but leads to more costly
bridge construction and coordination. {
c
RCTC Savings = $50,000
(Caltrans Savings = $Unknown)
i
5. Based on 5% annual inflation, the two year delay on the grade separation project
would increase costs ($6 million x 5% x 2 years), not counting other cost impacts noted
above.
Caltrans Savings = $600,000
6. Disruption of traffic would continue for a two year period if the bridge were built now
compared to a three year period if built after Sanderson and ,Lamb Canyon.
R00825
(ROTC Savings = $Unknown)
AGENDA ITEM #5D
1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
November 4, 1992
Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
Otto Gaastra, Right -of -Way Manager
Mark Massman, Measure A Project Manager
Jack Reagan, Executive Director
Addendum No. 1 to the Master Agreement with Riverside County General
Services Agency, Building Services Division (RCGSABSD) for Real Property
Acquisition and Relocation Assistance Services
In July 1992, Commission approved an Agreement for "Real Property Services" with
Riverside County General Services Agency, Building Services Division (RCGSABSD) to
permit that agency to perform the Commission Right -of -Way acquisition activities to
facilitate various Measure A projects (The agreement has been signed by RCTC but has
yet to be submitted to the County Board of Supervisors for final approval). In order to
implement this agreement requires project specific addenda be prepared to define the
tasks, budget, and schedule for work to be performed under the agreement.
it is proposed to implement our first work order under the Master Agreement. This
Addendum No. 1 will be worked out with legal counsel and will address two specific work
tasks including:
1. Relocation (RAP) services for people occupying the residential units at the Pierce
Street Commuter Station property to facilitate the demolition of these
improvements. The budget for these relocations was previously approved by
RCTC. Due to the need for immediate action on these relocations, the RCGSABSD
has been working on these relocations (estimated cost of $60,000.00) at RCTC
request. This Addendum will enable reimbursement for their services. RCGSABSD
has submitted an estimated budget of $5000.00 for these services.
2. Perform Right -of -Way appraisal and acquisition services for a portion of the Route
79 in Lambs Canyon, southerly of Beaumont. It is proposed to use the RCGSABSD
to acquire the right-of-way for at least the southerly one-half of the Lambs Canyon
project. The right-of-way effort for this segment (approximately 40 parcels with an
estimated value of $400,000.00) is being expedited in order to secure the
necessary property from which to secure embankment material to construct the
AGENDA ITEM 6A
DATE:
TO:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
November 4, 1992
Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Staff Analyst III
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Measure A Specialized Transit Allocation to Maintain Reduced Fares -
Cities of Riverside and Corona
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
The approved FY 1993-99 Short Range Transit Plan for the City of Riverside Special
Transit Services Program (Elderly & Handicapped Dial -A -Ride Program) was approved
by the Commission at their meeting on June 10,1992. Included in the plan was
$19,000 in Measure A funds to supplement fare revenues in order to meet the
required 10% fare revenue to operating cost ratio. Without the supplement of
Measure A funds, the City would be forced to increase the fare from its current rate
of $.45 per ride. The City has received Measure A funds to offset potential fare
increases for the past three fiscal years. Staff recommends that the Commission
allocate up to $19,000 in Measure A funds to the City of Riverside program to meet
the required 10% fare revenue to operating cost ratio for Fy 1992-93.
CITY OF CORONA
The City of Corona is also experiencing difficulties in meeting its required 20% fare
revenue to operating cost ratio for its general public dial -a -ride program. While
Corona's program is open to the general public, it does qualify for Measure A
Specialized Transit funds to cover the loss in revenue resulting from the discounted
fares charged to the 54% of the ridership who are senior citizens or persons with
disabilities. Without a Measure A subsidy, Corona would have to increase fares to the
general public and to seniors and persons with disabilities. The current fare is $1.00
for the general public and $.50 for seniors and persons with disabilities. The FY
1993-99 Short Range Transit Plan for the City of Corona included an assumption that
Measure A funds would be approved by the Commission. Staff recommends that the
Commission allocate up to $27,400 in Measure A funds to fund the actual difference
between the full fare revenue and the discounted fare revenue for the elderly and
handicapped riders who use the system in FY 1992-93 to allow the City of Corona
program to meet the required 20% fare revenue to operating cost ratio for FY 1992-
93.
AGENDA ITEM #6B
DATE:
TO:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
November 4, 1992
Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Staff Analyst III
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Request for Proposal - Establishment of an Integrated Transit Planning
Process for the Development and Coordination of New Transit Service
in the Western Riverside County
There are currently five public transit operators in the Western Riverside County area,
as well as a number of private non-profit and social service agencies that provide
transportation. The Metrolink Commuter Rail will soon start service, adding to the
array of transportation available to Western Riverside County residents. Transit
service expansion to meet service demands, the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act and operating subsidies for Metrolink may require the use of all
available Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for transit operations. With the possibility
of future requests for funding exceeding projected revenues, the Commission will have
to determine how these competing interests should be addressed.
Staff recommends that the Commission should invite proposals from qualified
consultants to establish a process for the development and coordination of new transit
service in the Western Riverside County. The study is intended to accomplish the
following:
11 Establish a process to determine when new or expanded transit services are
warranted and how they can be most efficiently provided.
2) Recommend a process to determine who should operate new service, i.e.,
existing public transit operator, private non-profit, social service agency, new
operator, etc.
3) Recommend how public fixed -route transit, commuter rail, public
paratransit, private non-profit paratransit and social service transportation can
be coordinated or consolidated.
SCOPE OF WORK
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED TRANSIT PLANNING PROCESS
FOR THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
The Riverside County Transportation Commission is inviting proposals from qualified consultants to
establish a process for the development and coordination of new transit service in the Western
Riverside County.
I. BACKGROUND
The Riverside County Transportation Commission was created by the State Legislature in 1976. The
Commission is responsible for the oversight and development of Riverside County's transportation
system. On an annual basis, the Commission is responsible for coordinating the development of the
county -wide Short Range Transit Plan ZSRTP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Transit
service expansion to meet service demands, the requirements of the ADA in the Western Riverside
County Area and operating subsidies for Metrolink may require the use of all available Local
Transportation Funds (LTF) for transit operations. It is proposed that LTF should no longer be made
available for street and road improvements as they were in the past.
There are currently five public transit operators in the area, four municipal operators and the Riverside
Transit Agency. A new commuter rail service to Orange and Los Angeles Counties will start service
over the next two years, and there is a growing number of private non-profit and social service
agencies providing transportation and requesting subsidies for operating and capital assistance through
federal, state and local funding programs. With the future requests for funding exceeding the projected
revenue available, the Commission needs to determine how these competing interests should be
addressed. The following questions need to be answered:
■ What is the most effective way to coordinate the services of the five public transit
operators, commuter rail and the numerous private and social service transportation
providers in the area?
O What type of process should be established to make decisions for funding new or
expanded services which compete for limited resources?
■ How will the Commission determine which operator should provide the service when
there are options available?
■ Would consolidation of services be more efficient and a more cost effective alternative?
A brief description of the operators currently providing transit service in the Western County is
provided below:
The Riverside Transit Agency, a joint powers authority comprised of twelve cities and the County of
Riverside, is the largest public transit operator in the Western County. RTA provides local, intercity,
and intercounty fixed -route services and local paratransit services, either directly or through contract,
to its member agencies.
The four municipal operators are members of the RTA but have elected to continue to operate local
services which began before the RTA was formed.
e Consultant approach to engagement
■ Detailed work plan with full description of tasks and deliverables
■ Project schedule
• Man hours and cost estimate
a Staffing plan
e Name of project manager and key staff, their relevant experience and background
o Firm's qualifications and relevant experience
IV. BUDGET
The Commission's maximum budget for all work to be performed by the Consultant is 570,000.
However, Offerors are urged to price their offers competitively and not use the budget ceiling as a
target price.
V. SCHEDULE
November 13, 1992 Distribution of RFP's
December 14, 1992 Proposals due to the Commission (5PM)
January 13, 1992 Commission selects consultant
January 18, 1992 Contract executed and work commences
April 9, 1992 Consultant submits draft report (5 copies)
April 19, 1992 Consultant meets with public transit operators to review draft
report and receive comments
May 3, 1992 Consultant submits final report (25 copies)
VI. PROPOSED AGREEMENT
The successful offeror will be subject to the provisions contained in the proposed agreement included
in this RFP, except that changes may be made to reflect the terms of the successful offeror's proposal.
The final agreement shall also incorporate other pertinent terms and conditions set forth in this RFP.
AGENDA ITEM #7
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
November 4, 1992
Budget & Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
Mike Davis, Environmental Manager
Jack Reagan, Executive Director
Amendment to Contracts with Hazardous Waste Consultants to Perform
Due Diligence Audits for Acquisition of Railroad Right -of -Way and
Commuter Rail Station Sites from the ATSF Railway (Santa Fe)
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has implemented a Hazardous Waste
Policy G-91-2 that requires a Phase 1 Initial Site Assessment (ISA) not only for all
properties purchased in -fee but for Commuter Rail "running rights" easements on existing
freight lines as well. This policy as well as other new and changing conditions will require
that RCTC look in more detail at the potential for hazardous waste contamination on all
rail properties under consideration for commuter service. In order to accommodate the
potential increase in cost for Phase 1 ISA's we need to augment the overall budget of
$250,000 hazardous waste work authorized by the Commission at the July 8,1992
Meeting as a Off Agenda/Urgency item.
The five "approved" Hazardous Waste Consultants are currently conducing Phase 1 Initial
Site Assessments on the Santa Fe (SF)/San Jacinto Branchline (SJB) and Union Pacific
(UP) lines. The total contract values for these efforts are as follows:
FIRM LOCATION CONTRACT AMOUNT
■ A.L Burke Engineers
■ BCM Engineers
■ Chambers Group
■ Converse Consultants
■ Ninyo & Moore
Pedley Station (UP)
Arlington,Madison,Van Buren
Station Sites&Citrus Spur(SF)
Perris Station/ Middle
Segment SF/SJB
HighGrove Station/North
Segment SF/SJB
Hemet Station/South
Segment SF/SJB
TOTAL
Budget Remaining
$ 17,420
$ 33,486
$ 16,000
$ 29,946
$ 33,000
$129,852
$120,148
AGENDA ITEM #8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: November 4, 1992
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Mark Massman, Measure A Project Manager
Louis Martin, Project Controls Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Quaterly Cost and Schedule Reports
The attached material depicts the current cost and schedule status of contracts
reported by Routes, commitments and Cooperative Agreements executed by the
Commission. For each contract and Agreement, the report lists the authorized value
approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date and
the project expenditures by route for the month and Quarter ending September 30,
1992.
Detailed supporting material for all schedules, contracts and Cooperative Agreement
is available from Bechtel staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file.
MM/LM:jw
attachments
L ;o L e6ed
SZL'ZOZ'EZ!
O N I11V101
pgS d3ldVf to d03 OIVd S3010AN1 30 d38Wf1N
LE01099'911!
90V6L L'SZ!
L9£'£06!
Eir9'6Z6'14
9E L' 9 L 6't!
1i l L' 169' L!
SZS'ELti'E£!
SSL'9E0' SZ!
9SS'9EL!
SS6'9£ L'�!
6£9'Zifir'Z!
ZLE'1,891E!
LLL'L11e6!
Z661 '0£ Jegiueide5
num 31110
Ol S3d11110N3dX3
60t4e9V£Z!
6£E'S L9'O L!
9SZ'99Z!
914.9 LZ!
6Li'SL£!
1,1911,1rE!
89 L'SL L'Z!
/W L L9'i!
189' LZ£!
ZLO'£9L'Z!
LO£' In!
S69'OLZ!
9Ei' S66!
Z66 L 'OC Jeq Wei e�S
ONION3 umum to
d03 3df1110N3dX3
%Le
%00 L
%00 L
%66
%96
%Z6
%96
%99
%99
%00 L
%06
%£6
0311WW0O
139Of18 30
39V1N3Od3d
SO9
ELO'1•Z6' L 1r L!
90V6L L'SZ!
1r9£'Z£Z' L!
£90'S9E'9!
000'999'9!
£6L'00014
1,LL'Z60'LE!
L L0'9SS' EE!
LLZ'ZZL' L!
000'61E1 L!
OSZ'6L6'Z!
S L L'69L'9!
31VO ❑1
S1N3W11WWOO
1Vd f l3Vd1NO3
d31dVf o 1:103
t9 1+6 6E`£9 L!
90V6L L'SZ!
1/9£'Z£Z' L!
£00'09E'9!
000'9LL'9!
6Z9' LEE'i!
LL9'S L9'LE!
ELE'ZPV9E!
9SL' L66' L!
000'6 LE't L!
LS L'OOE'£!
6L£'
0001S09' 1,
NOIIV3011V
03ZIdOH1AV
NOISSW11403
Z661 '0£ d391131d3S ONIONS 0011:13d
11:10d31:1 iman8 A1d31dVno
8133f Odd AVMHOIH V 3dfISV3W OlOd
03883301id S3010AN1 30 1:138WAN
Sldl41
11Vd d31fIWWOO
3OI1:1-N -XdVd
'SOAS NVId WVd001M
'MOS LWOW 133f 01id 131H338
WVIi001M 'AOddW1 39NVHO1i31N1
81331'0dd SLZ-I
l6 31f10d
81331'Odd L L L 31f10d
99 31f10d
6L 31flOd
iL 31f10d
'33110V '41000 VNOdOO
N0I1dId0S30
133POdd
0Z6'6►erS
()zeeLL'4S
i 1 t' L69' lS
000'09ZS
b► l'L l6' IS
06S'Z9Z'Z£:
E IL'999'9ZS
LL9'EL9'ES
eirect9'£Z!
Z6L'90LS
9Z9'996' lS
E09'64L'ZS
9Z£' £EL'91S
19Z'6L 1$
L9Z'6Lls
661.64
90'6 3
699'91►1$
699'964S
See'e►e'ZS
9Z4'0ZS
0ZZ'6ZIS
69l' lLE'ZS
%96
%ZS
%00l
%16
1G86
MO
1669
%e9
%001
%L9
%69
%L9
y to Z eBud
00011 9'9it
000'999'9S
£6L'11ooll
000'099S
(1)
E6L'O9E'ES
t•LL'360'LE$
000'09L'Z£S
(S)
6LL'ZEE' bS
►L0'9SS'E£S
Z6L'90IS
l69'EZ9'ZS
OE6'L99'ES
999'990'LZS
000'9Ll'et
000'9LL'9S
6Z9'l££'is
000'099S
(1)
6Z9' 199'ES
LL9'S 19'LC$
oar osezes
(S)
LL9'SS9'bS
£L£'Zi£'e£=
z6L'9015
LS 1'LteeS
9ZZ'600'4S
96l'Z96'0ES
31V0 Ol Z661 'O£ iegwel 031660100 31.Vi1 01
S3Hf1110N3dX3 030N3 HLNOW 13JOf19 30 S1N3W11W1100
1103 3Hf1110N3dK3 30V1N301:13d 1VHfLLOVU1N00
131H0318 1V1019f1S
(00£6
OW6'0016'0006'006908)
'MOS 1119N11031"01id 131H039
3O NVH0u31N11V101ta(1$
(owoN;o Am) 01 ewnA
(ZE l6'LZ 1.6'9Z16
9z 1.617Z l6'L016'Y 10601i)
(S.liSd) 6,6u3 NeulWlle1d
WVli90ud •A0k1d1111 39NVH0u31N1
S 1Z-I 1V1019f1S
(ZZZ601:1 'ZHdL000
'8 lHdL000'6006'17006'E00601i)
lozo6'9106'900601:11
•uainu3/6.16u3 Annmtu leid
S103POud S lZ-1
l6 3lflbu 1V1019f16
(Le Woe) 9lZ-I o191-�
(0E 16'6Z 16'9Z 16'EZ 160FJ)
91-1 of ►LUS
(Z 1Z6'S016'E016'Z016' 10160H)
kepi of egou6evi
(Y 1 Z6'E£ I6'Z006
1006'3069' 1069' 109901:11
(A0H)100 of enouBeyy
S103POud 16 31(101:1
NOLLV0011V NOLL IPAOS30
03ZII10H1f1V 1031.011d
NOISSIWWOO
31f101i JL9 1HOd3u 1390f19
61931'011d AVMH9I1-1 V 3u(1SV ri 010u
aeocAao.a •ow s+uEIS
17 10 b 9Bed
•sla6pnq Jew( mos1l of palela.] lou pue poenuo0/130aid Idol 101 ale sanleA ov
•spun100C 9S 10 a6essed Aq peonpai aq Aew (Z)
•sweJ6aid luawanoxdwi a6ueyalap Isup6e ueoi (j) :310N
000'0oo'LLs 7 S1V101
000' 000'L IS
000000L1S
NVOI V131Hdf1W 1V1019ns
swewenadwl e6ueyoielul
SlZ—Il91-1 wewee16V ue01
V1311:1LIMI AO ALIO
30NV1V11 NV01 31V0 Ol 31V0 Ol
JNIONV1S1n0 S1N3W3Suf19W13u S3u0110N3dX3
Z661 'OE iegwsldeS
030N3 HLNOW
uOj 31:IniiaN3dX3
NOI1V0011V NOI1,i1H7S3i1
O3ZIHOvanv 103fOud
WM81WWOO
3111011 A9 11:10d3F1 139CM8
S1O3f01id AVMHJIH V 31inSV3W 31311
oul IsmalsAs edanemiud ( 3 )
panauddti
Ra3taa4�
uoisinm
alPC
dd00 131H039
3 1 0 0 3 H 0 S A d d W W n S
WUd00dd 1WAOddWI 1d0d9N0d1 d i`InSti3W
N55IWW00 N1d0d9NUd1 A1Nn00 301Sd3AId
,ciinipy 6e�e9 COBJ6o�j I I d/ O
.w`cu61v0 T.,11:�J I I
ca3ep ��tt l.Ie3��eg [.IewmS I
bbddHL 4siulj loaroud
VINtirZ IJe}S loaroud
Zb13Ol ale() Pled
Zb1DOlZ a4e0 }old
NOI13MISN00 1
AVM 30 11-19Ia
38Sd ONV N9IS30 -MD I
1U1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NIa33NI9N3 Add NIWI13Hd
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9N1d33NI9N3 AdVNIWIl3dd
(HAM 01NI3ar 51INW0Vld38 390Id8 NOSa30NV5 bL1H
{
1a1N3WN0aIAN3 8 9NIa33NI9N3 Add NIWIl3dd
AVM 30 1H9Id
38Sd ONV N9I530 laNIJ
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NIN33NI9N3 Add NIWIl3dd
NOI100H1SN00
53Na1 4 01 N30IM - SIZI O1 15 9 bLld
I
AVM30 1119Id
I
38Sd ONV N9I530 1VNI3
i
3NV1 b 01 N30IM - (5IHd3d NI)1S 9 01 1S H1G trad
S3NV1 b 01 N30IM - 1S H1G 01 SlI 6L18
1
I
I
AVM 30 1149IH
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 9NId33NI9N3 AdVNIWIl3Hd
385d aNV N9I530 1UNI3
S3NV1 8 01 N30IM - SlI IN 01 AVM A3110A 091d
1
A d U N I W I 1 3 d d
S3NV1 9 01 N30IM - 01\18 SONV103d 01 SIZI 091d
NOI100d1SN00
AVM 10 1H9Ia
f
1
1V1N3WNOdIAN3 8 9NI2133NI9N3 AdVNIWI13ad
A d U N I W I 1 3 d d
385d ONV tiOi530 1VNI3
S3NV1 9 01 N30IM-0I SIO/lb/09 01 AVM A311VA 091a
38Sd ONV N9I530 1VNI3
Of NI of sl al r! r! w! al WI �l r
9hbl
NOI100dISN00
AVM 30 1119Id
I
I
1
al Nf
ENair]
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NId33NI9N3 AaVNIWIl3Hd I
riwlalw1J1f
Sbbl
al NI af51f
6bbl
cal NI of sl al rl rJ w! al wl 31 r
of Nl 0
slafrTrlW1 1.11 if
ebb[
39NVH0d31NI 130a15N00 - a0 VWOA lV Slla
ai Nrol s} of rl ri WI al wf �l
lbbl
r
al Nf of 51 al rl rl Wl al wl 31 r
0bbl
uul mialsxs euane
1 dd (0 )
TW.ld4(
pal 44
uolslna8
dd00 131H330
air('
3 l (1 0 3 H 0 S A d d W W n S
Wdd00dd 1WAOddWI 1dOdSNdd1 0 MASd3W
NSSIWW00 N1dOdSNVd1 ,l1N(100 30ISd3AId
E l° G ice,
NOI10Oa15NO3
I
i
38Sd ONV NO1S30 lVNI3
i
llinilau WipauaLaalla W/ O
Jae wa.i6a.id 1 �
uoleu61sa4 millu7 1 I
salad tlueyiJeg Aasmans L
6b8dVL 4siuij paroud
b6NVfZ fuels laaroud
Zb1301. ale0 e4e0
Zb1)01.Z °led lo)d
AVM l0 1H9Id
{
!
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NId33NI9N3 AaVNIWI13dd
A d V N I W I l 3 d d
NOIlUIS A3103d IIVa a31f1wo
NOI130a15NO3
AVM 30 1HOld
1N3W3d000ad 8 N9I530 1VNI3
i
I
I
( MS 1N3NVWd3d 30M1V313 NIAN3 S30r)1oNI) 1V1N3WN0aIAN3 8 9NIa33NION3 AdUNIWIl3dd l
I
NOI1U15 WIa31NI NMO1NMOO IIVa 831nwwo
ONO (dSd) 1d0d3a AOOlS 133f Oad i
ONO (dSd) 1a0d3d A0015 103rOdd
Sle la NO S1N3W3A0WWI 39NVH0d31NI
I
AlNO (dSd) Id0d3a AOOlS 103rOdd
lb la NO S1N3W3A0ddWI 39NVH3d31NI
l
I
09 la NO S1N31.13A0ddWI 39NVH0d31NI
A1N0 (dSd) 1d0d3a AOn1S 133rOdd
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NId33NI91.13 AaVNIWI13ad
Ol la NO S1N3W3A0adWI 39NVH3d31N1
AlNO (dSd) 1d0d3a AOOlS 103f0ad
I S80103NN03 3S 8 SM - SlZ/16/09 39NVH3a31NI S10Id
l
1
AlNO (a5d) 1d0d3a AOOlS 103f0ad
S3NV1 8 01 N30IM - 138S 01 13f W/093 Slzla
l
J
( SNOI1V301 9 ) S1N3W3A0adWI dO0Iaa00 1111d
A1N0 (dSd) 1a0d3a A001S 133fOdd
1
1V1N3WN0dIAN3 8 9NIa33N19N3 AdUNIWIl3ad
NOI130d1SN00
9NIN30IM 30IS100 - SIZI Ol SlI 1b18
C
9NIN30IM 30I5100 - SlI 01 1GdS lbld
A1N0 NOI1V0I3I1a33 AVM 30 1H9I8 Frmmmmmmmmmmli
0NV
385d N9IS30 1VNI3 [
AOH NVI03W - 1S AaVW 01 3AV VIlONOVW lbld
al NI -510l rl rLwi F(l wl �J r
9661
ni N! a! Sl of rl rf wl i WI ll r
ab61
u[Nil 01510 ri r] Wl ulWi 3lr
bbbl
al Nl Ql SI r(jrrrl
Ebbl
qulwl�lr
al NI 9 s! (:i ri real wl �Tr
Z66 l
al
NI
Olslklrlrlwialwjifr
lbbl
al NI 01 slat rl rI wl
Obbl
riI
W� 3I
r
PAGE NO.
10/27/92
CONTRACT
NUMBER
1
0007PS2
0007PS3
0007PT1
0007PT2
0007PT3
0007RA2
0007RA3
0007RS3
0008OC3
0008182
0008183
0008SB1
0008582
0008583
000981
0009BP1
0009PT2
R08801
R08900
R08901
R08902
R08905
R08907
R08908
R09000
R09001
CONSULTANT FIRM
SMITH L ACKLER
D.J.SMITH ASSOCIATES
Covers Several Firee/Cansultents/Persons
COVERS SPECIAL TRANSIT PROJECTS AGENCIES
Several Specialized Transit Firer
COVERS SEVERAL FIRMS L CONSULTANTS
VARIOUS FIRMS, VENDORS TO RAIL RELATED PROJECTS
VARIOUS VENDORS, CITY OF RIVERSIDE, TRI-CO, ETC.
1CNA
COVERS SEVERAL FIRMS/CONSULTANTS/PERSONS
STANDARD INSURANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FIND
Covers Several Firms/Consultants/Persona
COVERS SEVERAL PERSONS L PERS
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMEUT SYSTEM
Covers Several Firms/Consultants/Persona
Covers Several Firm/Consultent■/Persons
COVERS SEVERAL FIRMS/CONSULTANTS/PERSONS
ROTC/OCTC MOU (Environmental Studies)
Bechtel Corporation
Parsons Orinckerhoff, Wade and Douglas, Inc.
Parsons, Brinckerhoff, ands and Douglas, Inc.
Schiermeyer Consulting Services
Route 86 Cooperative Agreement
City of Corona
Bechtel Corporation
NOS/Lowry
REPORT COMMIT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMITMENT LOG REPORT
Sorted by CONTRACT NUMBER
SCOPE OF WORK
AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL TOTAL
RCTC COMMITTED TO COMMITTED TO AMOUNT AMOUNT
COORD. BASE WORK EXTRA WORK COMITTED EXPENDED
LEGISLATIVE ADVOCATE
PROF SERVICES LEGISLATIVE
Professional Services - Transit Projects
SPECIALIZED TRANSIT
Specialized Transit Claimm
MISC CHARGES RELATED TO RAIL
MISC EXPEMCE RELATED TO RAIL,FENCES,OPERATING COSTS
RAIL SUPPORT FOR UP KEEP OF PROPERTY
DEFERRED COMP
INSURANCE (WC, LIFE, SHORT i LONG DISAB)
LIFE LONG A SHORT TERN DISABILITY A WC INS
Salaries A Benefits
HEALTH L SALARY BENEFITS
HEALTH BENEFITS,ENPLOYEES REIMBURSEMENTS
Financial Services - Bond Interest
Band Principal Repayment
PASS THRU
Environmental Studies with the Keith companies
Project Management
Rt. 91 Conceptual Design Services
Rt. 91 Final design - converted to a lump sum contract
Commuter Rails Consulting Services
Construct 4 lane expressway at Rt. 86
Cooperative Agreement
Program Management
Final Design Svcs for Rt 91 bet. Serfas Club i Main St.
DM
TM
DM
JR
CB
DM
TH
DM
DN
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
DM
MTN
LM
ML
KS
HS
MTN
ML
LN
ML
45577.00
44712.00
2251942.00
3248380.00
1500000.00
500000.00
500000.00
20000.00
48477.00
50000.00
34653.00
685479.00
112520.00
106488.00
1500000.00
10000000.00
472980.00
T9527.76
170000.00
2234275.00
739000.00
558000.00
21035400.00
14605000.00
1291000.00
970338.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
80000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12566.00
45577.00
44712.00
2251942.00
3248380.00
1500000.00
500000.00
500000.00
20000.00
48477.00
50000.00
34653.00
685479.00
112520.00
106488.00
1500000.00
10000000.00
472980.00
79527.76
170000.00
2314275.00
739000.00
558000.00
21035400.00
14605000.00
1291000.00
982904.00
42486.08
10547.50
992338.17
1656696.00
151030.76
292459.47
52432.51
317.02
10468.20
40372.88
4986.66
103546.19
117197.23
28570.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
65018.48
170000.00
2040798.86
713999.08
430701.11
1210108.65
10763447.75
1059104.15
976013.99
52'9£L£21 00'00h99t 00'0 00'00h991. MN
9h'000L695 00"LO/Lh£L 00'LL909h 00'0t99999 lM
00'0 00'0000051 00'0 00'000005L
06'16/901 061.6L901 00'0 06'L6L90t lM
th'9fLhhh 02'fh96hh 02'5/99S 00'99116f H1
£1'6f5£9 00'tttt0h 00'61£25 00'26L9h£ ONr
16'L299611 f9'2526LLL 00'0002E2 £9'252Lh5L a1r
fl'L96SLf 00'95095/ 00'00009 00'95096£ lM
90'2/61£2 00'990/25 00'9£9L92 00'2£2952 lM
92'hLL6h1. 00'2LLISL 00'00002 00'2fLh£L IN
69'699/22 00'2/1922 00'00052 00'2LL1.02 lM
9h'S2L£9£ £h'056919 OL'11h09 fL'9Lh9£5 NM
99110/L9£ 00'0,1,6 00'214L1 00'92/9h ON
00'06516 00'0206/ 00'0 00'0206/ Ml
12'25t09 00'005Lt1 00'0 00'00SLtt 011r
/L'65f9f£ 00'1f06L£ 00'5f/91 00'96229f OS
fL'I/LhhL 00'h95991 00'69612 00'5659/1 H31
51.'00/L22 00'99££22 00'£L292 00'£L1L61 B31
69'0E296£ 05'60£9L£ 00'h906h OS'522L2£ Hn
2h'669h09 00'h99SL£I 00'909tLt 00'950hhLl NA
6£11hhft 00'00052 00'0 00'00052 M1
5L'9010h 00'00005 00'0 00'00005 MI
ff'66095h 00'09999L 00'0 00'09999L SON
L9'h£19£9 SL'hOh£SOt /5'00/LEL 19'£009t6 SON
00'0699 00'00001 00'0 00'0000t nr
hh'160t5t 00'0000LI 00'0 00'0000Lt H1
aims 7 N91530'3110000108 .0h
Vdr 1SNO3 3371 901-0I011 LOIS AOH 1SNO7
512-1 NO DO 390101S13 1S007 33190 d0-03
160S 70 30V031801d i0 1S07 0011301115007 103113309V d0-07
S1-I 01 1411 Si 1610 90103301903 3111001
90101M amino 1610 1N3NSS3SSV 10103NNOVIAN3
100d31 173r0Nd/90I83301903 AVVNIM113Nd
1610 9001V S390V0713101 S.11Sd
Sl2/09HS 9001V 390111713101 5'11Sd
011 7 1.611S NO AOI115 road 101 SA7S 903
090S NO 0)03101 S1HOd38 A01115 rOHd 1101 90103301903
1'11-0'0 Md NOM L6 1N 9NIA3A1111S
hL 31I101 HDi S371A00S 1V1038NDVIAN3
10383309V 3SV31 101 3010 7 NOVd
SISAIVNV S3A11YNtl31111 - AOn1S A111181SV34
Boom NVSAl1 1N3MN13A09 i0 70SSV V7 M13N1110S 01 !SISSY
6L 311101 (S1731101d Onl) NO 90103301903 7IiiVVI
hL einoN (siaelord f) uo 8utr8e01u3 �tiierl
62 31(101 90IddV11 1V11910 7 90IA3AVIIS
hL mos 911103301903 ANVNIMI131d
S1113833090 3SV31 30111-0-710Vd 310110930
SNOI1V1109311 35V31 3011-0-7111Vd 31V110930
6L e1110H r0; sa3IAJas 6utraeu0Su3 AJeutst)sad
NOANV7 SONV1 6L '111 S7AS -18/0'1543 2 '9N3 Hal3Hd
uotisattuo3 *manor o3 espil)3e; IIeO ro; paw alp AMIS
MY100Hd 1031(3900VM 11011S39N07 i0 1N311d013A30
03003d1(3 031111103 11100 00113 1100 3SV9 '01003
mow 1Nf1 o 01 0311118103 01 0311101403 3130
11101 1V101 Imola imno IV
11On i0 3d07S
13s111N 131011003 AO pgrOS
1110d31 901 1038II10077
NOISSIMIO7 NOI1V110dS0V111 Aim= 3015H3A(a
11NN07 180d3H
'301 'S351Hd13103 000013311
(SNVH1lV7) II0I1V110dWill i0 10311180d30
301513AIH i0 A113
VNO107 i0 A113
S3101705s0 7 AHr
'301 'S31VI3OSSV VSl
S31VI70SSV ONV S3001
ANVd1109 7 03111V7 M03130
1110 NZH7
S03301903 13SIVH i71
'701 S10011051103 SNVl
'701 90I13AINIS 1SVO3
'7111 '3711313S 90103381903
NVN00 NVA '7 01VN00/A11513A111H VON11 MIDI
(9VONVS) S1N311113A09 OSSV 011100V013e NVS
S31V17OSSV ONV IIHr
'701 '901033019113 3A101
'dro7 eu1r88083 Awn'
S31VI70SSY ONV 15014 MVlllln 'N131 103100
11YNN3003W 7 N05NHOr 'NNW '131010
'711I '531V170SSV ONV111Y9/S113A31S
S371A13S NOIlY1HOdSNV'1 ONYINI
•]ut 'sraauteu3 1!A!7 )etuualua7
300011 7 S311V0
SI1103d i0 1113 (S31V170SSV 7 H3A009 '310011) VSW
'70SSV 9NINNVId 7 1170V3S311 1311VA
111i 1NY1111sN07
hEt601
i£t60H
2f1601
tft601
O£L6OH
62t601
921601
L21601
921601
52I60H
/MOH
£21601
221601
121609
0216013
61160H
014608
Lt16011
911601
S1I60H
/MOH
£t16oH
21t6OH
11L601
01160H
60160H
13811111
130011103
26/L2/01
'ON 39Vd
77'2766005£L U 14197£l52 67'507215 £2'9119122972
00'0 00'00091 00'0602 00'016£1 aNr
00'0 00'97662 00'906£ 00'0709Z aNr
00'0 00'987££ 00'OL£7 00'91162 aNr
00'0 00'000££ 00'50£7 00'56982 0Wr
00'£07151 00'00659£ 00'0 00'00659£ NO
05'98115 00'0OLL67 00'0 00'0OLL67 NO
£8'20£952 00'055297 00'0 00'055297 Na
00'0 00'000091 00'0 00'000091 MN
79'9£517 00'000527 00'17£ZOI 00'6592LE SA
00'5057 00'00001 00'0 00'00001 N1
00'0 00'0000£2 00'7L51£ 00'927161 SX
1.9'L97£ 00'000£11 0017751 00'655L6 SA
00'0 00'0000501 00'7225£L 00'911716 SA
00'0 00'0000881 00'9692,2 00'70£1£91 SA
00'0 00'00000ZZ 00'7L2052 00'92L6h61 SA
82'98879 00'£OOSf£ 00'9£257 00'L9L692 SA
L6'L0265 00'0007981 00'00088 00'0009LL1 Nl
00'000082 00'000059 00'0 00'000059 H1
_00 11110Z 00'00119 00'0 00'00119 MN
00'79662 00'00051 00'0 00'00051 83
£Z'676LL£ 76'17LLLh 00'00029 76'17L511 ill
96'£L26L 00'000L51 00'71502 00'95,9£1 S1
51'961572 51'961572 00'0 51'961572 90
86'5L211 7613L0552 00'000052 76'8L05 aNr
1N3N93S (11N 3Vf NVS 3i V1NVS 5S3SSV 1V1N3NNOHIAN3 I Hd
Ala ens 3Vf NVS 31 V1NVS 553SSV 1V1N3NN0111AN3 I Hd
NOSIOVN - 3i V1NVS S311S 7 1V SS3SSV 1V1N3NNHIAN3 1 Hd
3Vf NVS IIVH 3i V1NVS VOA S1N3NSS3SSV 1V1N3NN0111AN3
AHOSIAOV 1V13NVNl4 1 lion
1V931
S331AH3S IIVH 1 91I3NVN11 1830 '1V931 032I11133dS
NV8908d enl3 N31fMLO3
133f0tld ACM NIVN-130 161m 1HOddnS N0113nm15NO3
aplsJanitl ;o All3 Jo; eul3111suo3 euluueld
151 01 S9dS NVN119 6L1H 1dH SASS 113INN33103S
Irma 3AOHMI AM AlA 01 Nl 03'9'S 09111 SA35 1131111331039
091H SASS 9N3 3 1Sd 53mn13nm15 191530 I11114
AlA 01 m38 NVS 0911J SASS 913 311d AVMOVOH 11991S30 1VNIA
15 151 01 S9dS NVN119 6L119 SASS 913 31Sd 191530 11111
133H1S 1SL 01 S9dS NVN119 6L111 SASS 9NIH331419113 MOH
1N3N39VNVW 133r0Hd
39NVH3H3111 3A1H0 vwnA
8011213d0 13V/11103 lo0dsns O1 Amens 100dsne
5331A83S 1118 801 NVId NO111853111 11S1181
LLL 18 HOi A3AHMS 31Ndvm90d11
lftld 3A0Vd141 AM A311VA 01 511'09111 SASS 1131NH331039
65L-8 113143389V 311538 1 NOI1151n03V MOH 3311A01
5331A1135 1V1N3NNOHIAN3 1113 NO
03aN3dX3 a3111NO3 XHOM VH1X3 AHOM 3518 '03H003
1Nn011V 1Nnowv O1 03111NN03 O1 a3111NN03 013H
1V101 1V101 1NnONV 1NnONV
... 1e101 ...
'311 d110119 51130W1H3
stmvllnsmo3 35H3AMO3
'3N1 'SV33119N3 1438
3800N 1 OANIN
9NIl0A 1 15183
113931111 1 1538 '1538
S113AN 1 AN3A13W.0
SHOaN3A Snolevn
H3AHVN 1 53100N
salepossV uosPlAOa 'd'r
S1NV1lnSN03 35113AN03
53111305SY 1 NONIO N3J3VH35
S83311913 51011311 1 'MON
311 SV19110a 1 3ovne ;AOHH3A3NIHS SNOSHVd
H3N13H9
'311 V3113119
N011181)dtl03 13114338
03m01 i0 A113
(513) S331.1835 N01111HOdSNVm1 H31111403
'3N1 NO111WVN 1 1311V ZOOS
'311 'S83311913 NIXAVf
NOAO39
SNVtlllV3
(V811) S31V1305SV NVNaNVVO 13VH3114
ZZ£60M
LZi6OH
02£6011
61E608
BL£60tl
Ll£60H
51£6oH
LI£60N
80£60m
LOf60H
90£60H
5o£6oH
70£60m
£0£60m
20E608
lo£60H
00£60m
LfZ60m
9£260H
5£260H
7£Z60m
Z£2608
8226011
LZZ60m
AMA i0 3d035
113816I1 131111103 AO Pa1-105
1110d311 901 1N3N11NN03
NOISSINN03 NOIIV1HOd5NYH1 Aimno3 3015113AIH
11NN03 1HOd3tl
1111I4 1NvllflSN03
H381HIN
131111103
26/L2/01
S 'ON 391d
TO:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Budget and Finance Committee
Administrative Committee
FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Office Services Manager
FOR: Dean Martin, Controller
SUBJECT: Proposal for Bonding Transaction
Bond documents are currently being prepared for Commission approval at their meeting
on November 12th. Staff will brief the Budget & Finance, and Administrative Committees
at their respective meetings on the proposal for bonding issuance.
Staff Recommendation
For discussion and possible action.
nk