Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPolicy Resolution-36 R2017-033RESOLUTION R2017-033 POLICY RESOLUTION NO. 36 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE 2016 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ANNUAL REPORT, AND APPROVING THE 2017 EQUITY AND IN CLUSION PLAN WHEREAS, Civil Service Rule 4, Part K states that the Civil Service Commission shall submit an annual Equal Employment Opportunity report to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Civil Service Commission have reviewed and recommend approval of the 2016 Equal Opportunity Report and 2017 Equity and Inclusion Plan; and WHEREAS, beyond our efforts of recruiting diverse talent, it is a priority for the City to examine equity and inclusion; and WHEREAS, the City has developed a partnership with the Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) to learn and apply strategies as well as utilize local and nationwide resources to address the City of Napa's desire to promote a culture of inclusion; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this mat ter, as presented at the public meetings of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City Staff, and any information provided during public meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Napa, as follows: 1.The City Council hereby approves the 2016 Equal Employment Opportunity Annual Report, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and incorporated herein by reference. 2.The City Council hereby approves the 2017 Equity and Inclusion Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by reference. 3.The City Council hereby directs the City Manager to designate the 2017 Equity and Inclusion Plan as a City Council Policy Resolution. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to organize and publish the 2017 Equity and Inclusion Plan as a part of the City Council Policy Resolutions. 4.This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Policy Resolution No. 36 R2017-033 Page 1of2 March 21, 2017 Page 1 of 31 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Napa at a public meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of March, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: Gentry, Inman, Mott, Sedgley, Techel NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ap7Zl1ic M(chael W. Barrett City Attorney R2017-033 Page 2 of 2 March 21, 2017 Page 2 of 31 1, Exhibit A CITY 01= NAPA H�MAN RESOURCES DEP,ARTMENT MEMO TO: Civil Service Commission FROM: DATE: Jennifer Brizel, Assistant Human Resources Director February 27, 2017 SUBJECT: Equal Employment Opportunity Report for 2016 Civil Service Rule 4 Part K states that the Civil Service Commission shall submit an annual Equal Employment Opportunity report to the City Council. This report addresses recruiting activity for calendar year 2016 and presents a utilization analysis of the City workforce as of December 31, 2016. The Human Resources Department conducted 80 recruitments, for 137 openings, in 2016, as . opposed to 69 recruitments for 201 openings in 2015. Sixty-one of these recruitments were for classified positions, up from 50 in 2015. Department staff also coordinated recruitment activities for 19 part-time recruitments (21 in 2015). Eligibility lists were created in 2016 for the following classified positions: Account Clerk I/II Accounting Technician (Entry) Assistant H.uman Resources Director Associate Civil Engineer Associate Civil Engineer (Capital Improvement/Special Projects) Associate Civil Engineer (Municipal Water Treatment) Chief Building Official Commun1ications Manager 1 • Construction Inspector (Promotional) Construction Inspector Assistant Deputy City Clerk Electrician I Engineering Aide (Construction) Engineering Aide (Stormwater) Engineering Assistant (P romotional) Equipment Mechanic Finance Analyst Finance Manager Finance Manager Firefighter Firefighter I Paramedic Housing Rehabilitation Program Supervisor Housing Rehabilitation Spe�ialist Junior Engineer Maintenance Laborer Management Analyst II (Business Coordinator) Management Analyst II (H uman Resources Analyst) Pa\r'ks, Trees 8: Facilities 'supervisor (Urban Forester) Permit Technician Personnel Assistant Planning Manager Plant Maintenance Mechanic I Police Captain Police Forensic Specialist Police Officer (Lateral) Police Officer (Lateral) Police Officer Trainee Police Property Technician Police Records Assistant I Human Resources: 1541 Second Street, Napa CA 94559 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559 I (707) 257-9505 I www.cityofnapa.org I. R2017-033 Page 1 of 14 Page 3 of 31 Police Sergeant (Promotional) Public Safety Dispatcher I Purchasing ft Inventory Specialist Purchasing Services Manager Records Analyst Records Analyst Recruitment Coordinator (Personnel Assistant) Secretary Senior Civil Engineer Senior Civil Engineer Senior Engineering Aide Street Field Supervisor Street Maintenance Worker I/II Systems Administrator Systems Administrator Systems Administrator (Promotional) Systems Analyst (Promotional) Waste Prevention Specialist Water Service Worker (Promotional) Water Systems Cross-Connection Specialist Water Treatment Facility Operator In 2016, the Human Resources Department introduced Competency-Based Behavioral Selection methods to department staff, the Executive Team and bargaining group representatives which included job analyses to more accurately identify technical competencies as well as knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors and culture fit through assessment techniques to maximize testing predictors for job success as well as minimize the risk of adverse impact, ensure cost-effectiveness and better meet the hiring department's workforce needs. In the calendar year 2016, 3,882 employment applications were filed, up from 3,652 in 2015. 58.8% of the applicants were male, as opposed to 55.1% in 2015, 39.4% were female, as opposed to 43.3% in 2015 and 1.8% did not identify their gender, compared to 1.6% in 2015. 48.89% of applicants identified themselves as White, as opposed to from 47.5% in 2015, 20% as Hispanic, as opposed to 21% in 2015, 8% as Black, up from 7.3% in 2015, 7.6% as Asian, down from 8.2% in 2015, 1.34% as Pacific Islander, up slightly from 1.1 % in 2015, 0. 98% as Native American, up from the 0.7% in 2015, and 6.62% as Two or More Races, up from 6.3% in 2015. 6.62% of applicants chose not to provide information on their race, as opposed to 6.7% in 2015. 54% of the candidates placed on eligibility lists in 2016 were male, down from 59.3% in 2015 and 45.56% were female up from 39.6% in 2015. 58.69% identified themselves as White, as opposed to 54.5% in 2015. 22% as Hispanic, up from 20.8% in 2014, 3.86% as Black, down from 5. 3% in 2015, 3% as Asian, down from 6. 6% in 2015, 1.1 % as Pacific Islander, essentially unchanged from 1.1 % in 2015, 0.4% as Native American, down from 0.6% in 2015, and 6. 95% as Two or More Races, up from 4. 9% in 2015. 3.8% chose not to disclose information on their race, down from 6.2% in 2015. The Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures under the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission indicates that the 4/5ths rule is the preferred method for determining adverse impact unless samples are very small or very large. Adverse impact is determined by a four step process. (www.eeoc.goy/policy/docs/qanda clarifY procedures.html) • Calculate the rate of selection for each group (divide the number of persons selected from a group by the number of applicants from that group). • Observe which group has the highest selection rate. Human Resources: 1541 Second Street, Napa CA 94559 I Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559 I (707) 257-9505 www.cityofnapa.org R2017-033 Page 2of 14 Page 4 of 31 " Calculate the impact ratios, by comparing the selection rate for each group with that of the highest group (divide the selection rate for a group by the selection rate for the highest group). " Observe whether the selection rate for any group is substantially less (i.e., usually less than 4/5ths or 80%) than the selection rate for the highest group. If it is adverse impact is indicated in most circumstances. The determination of adverse impact may be determined by a variety of factors. It is important for the City of Napa to evaluate adverse impact and mitigate factors which may imply the cause to be related to employee selection methods. The relationship between applicants and those being placed on eligibility lists indicates that the selection processes developed and utilized in 2016 were consistent with our goal of minimizing adverse impact. Utilization Analysis The utilization analysis for the City was based on the 2016 employee base and the 2010 census data. The utilization analysis compared the number of individuals in each gender and race/ethnicity group employed by the City on December 31, 2016, in specific job groups, with the numbers of their counterparts who are available in the relevant labor market. The labor markets which were identified and defined for the 2015 report were used again for 2016. The different labor markets for the Availability Analysis are local counties, weighted by the percentage of the workforce living in each county; California; National; and Internal Feeders. The local labor market was weighted 75.53% Napa County, 19.27% Solano County and 5.2% Sonoma County. The town of residence at time of hire for hires during 2014 and 2015 was used to determine the relative weights between Local, California and National groups. The weight to the Feeder groups was based on classes from which an employee would promote into a different group. For example, the feeder group percentage for Professionals is based on the classes in Professionals which are potentially filled by employees in the Technicians group. Underutilization was identified if the percentage of individuals employed was lower than the percent available. The underutilization number indicates the whole number of employees in that group which would be needed for our workforce to reflect the labor market. The data in the 2016 Utilization Analysis has been consolidated by EEO Job Group. Under� utilization was identified in 2016 in the following job groups: Officials and Administrators (1 Female, 1 Black, 2 Hispanic, 1 Asian); Professionals (3 Black, 4 Asian, 1 Two or More/Other); Technicians (2 Black, 3 Asian, 1 Two or More); Protective Service Workers (1 Female, 6 Black, 4 Hispanic, 5 Asian, 1 Two or More); Para-Professionals (1 Asian); Administrative Support (8 Male, 2 Black, 2 Asian, 2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander); Skilled Craft Workers (3 Female, 2 Black, 5 Hispanic, 1 Asian); Service/Maintenance (5 Female, 3 Black) This data documents an decrease in underutilization from 2015. The Placement Goals report for 2016 and 2017 are attached as Attachment 1. Human Resources: 1541 Second Street, Napa CA 94559 I Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559 I (707) 257-9505 R2017-033 Page 3of 14 Page 5 of 31 At the end of 2016 there was underutilization of Females in four out of eight categories. In 2015 there was underutilization in three categories. The underutilization in Officials and Administrators (from 0 in 2015 to 1 in 2016), Protective Service (from 0to 1); Skilled Craft (unchanged at 2) and Service Maintenance (from 3 to 5); can be attributed to high availability rates coupled with low participation rates across all of the groups identified and studied within this report. In this past year, the underutilization of Females decreased in the Para-Professional Job Group. There was underutilization of Hispanics in three of eight categories, down from five categories in 2015; Officials and Administrators (from 3 in 2015 to 2 in 2016), Protective Services (from 8 to 4) and Skilled Craft (from 4 to 5). As with the Female group, this can be attributed to high availability rates coupled with low participation rates across all of the groups identified and studied within this report. There was an increase in the underutilization of Blacks in 2016. There was underutilization in seven of eight groups, up from six in 2015. However, due to a decrease in staffing, the number of employees available have decreased the underutilization of Blacks from 21 to 19. The job group with the highest underutilization is Protective Services (decreasing from 22 in 2015 to 17 in 2016). Increasing the diversity in this group is a priority for the City. The Fire Department has included increasing diversity as one of their strategic goals. The Human Resources Department continues to work with both the Fire and Police Departments to increase diversity, including targeted outreach for entry level recruitments and development of reserve and volunteer programs. The City plans to continue outreach efforts throughout the community, including recruitment utilizing social media, wide distribution of job announcements through direct mailings and emails to a variety of community organizations and groups, as well as continued outreach at high school and college job fairs, internships, informational interviewing, job shadowing, and presentations in classrooms and at various community forums. Additionally, we strive to build a workforce which is reflective of the relevant labor market within the community it serves. Beyond our efforts of recruiting diverse talent, it is a priority for the City to examine equity and inclusion. Attachment 2 demonstrates objective measures we will focus on in 2017 to determine and address race and gender equity throughout the City. We have established a partnership with the Government Alliance on Race and Equity to learn and apply strategies as well as utilize local and nationwide resources to address the City of Napa's desire to promote a culture of inclusion. Recommendation The Assistant Human Resources Director recommends that the Civil Service Commission: (1) approve the Equal Employment Opportunity Report for 2016, and direct the Assistant Human Resources Director to submit the Report to City Council; and (2) approve recommending that the City Council approve the Equity&: Inclusion Plan for 2017. Attachments: Attachment 1: Diversity Placement Goals (Plan Date: 01/0112016) Attachment 2: Equity&: Inclusion Plan -2017 Attachment 3: GARE Fact Sheet Human Resources: 1541 Second Street, Napa CA 94559 I Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559 I (707) 257-9505 www.cityofnapa.org R2017-033 Page 4of 14 Page 6 of 31 Job Group: 01 -Officials Administrators Total Employees: 38 Employees (#) Employees (%) Availability (%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (# of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male Female 31 7 81.6% 18.4% 73.0% 27.0% Yes No b 1 0 0 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Native American Black Hispanic Asian /Alaskan Native 1 1 1 0 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 0.0% 3.6% 9.1% 5.0% 0.5% No No No Yes 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 Native Hawaiian/ Other White Pacific Islander 0 35 0.0% 92.1% 0.1% 80.7% Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 Increased underutilization of Female, Black and Asian. Decreased underutilization in Hispanic from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 5of14 Other 0 0.0% 9.0% Yes 0 0 Page 7 of31 Job Group: 02 -Professionals Total Employees: 80 Employees (#) Employees {%) Availability (%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (#of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male 48 60.0% 62.6% Yes 0 2 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 32 0 9 4 40.0% 0.0% 11.3% 37.4% 5.0% 11.0% 12.2% Yes No Yes No 0 3 0 4 0 4 1 6 Decreased underutilization in Male, Black, Hispanic and Asian from 2016 goals. R2017--033 Page 6of14 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other White Other Pacific Native Islander 1 0 66 0 1.3% 0.0% 82.5% 0.0% 0.2% 0.4% 69.3% 1.8% Yes Yes Yes No 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Page 8 of 31 Job Group: 03 -Technicians Total Employees: 61 Employees (#) Employees (%) Availability (%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (# of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male 36 59.0% 59.6% Yes 0 3 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 25 0 12 3 41.0% 0.0% 19.7% 4.9% 40.4% 4.3% 16.7% 10.7% Yes No Yes No 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 Decreased underutilization in Male from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 7of14 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other White Other Pacific Native Islander 1 0 44 1 1.6% 0.0% 72.1% 1.6% 0.3% 0.4% 65.0% 2.7% Yes Yes Yes No 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Page 9 of31 Job Group: 04 -Protective Service Workers Total Employees: 93 Employees (#) Employees (%) Availability (%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (# of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male 89 95.7% 93.9% Yes 0 0 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 4 0 12 1 4.3% 0.0% 12.9% 1.1% 6.1% 7.8% 19.9% 7.4% No No No No i 6 4 5 0 7 8 6 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other White Pacific Native Islander 1 0 79 1.1% 0.0% 84.9% 0.5% 0.4% 65.0% Yes Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Increased underutilization of Female. Decreased underutlization of Black, Hispanic and Asian from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 8of14 Other 0 0.0% 1.5% No 1 1 Page 10 of31 Job Group: OS -Paraprofessionals Total Employees: 7 Employees (#) Employees {%) Availability{%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (# of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male 3 42.9% 58.0% No 1 0 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 4 0 1 0 57.1% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 42.0% 1.6% 9.5% 6.9% Yes Yes Yes No 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other White Other Pacific Native Islander 0 0 6 0 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0% 2.4% 0.2% 75.8% 3.7% Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 Increased underutilization of Male. Decreased underutlization of Female, Asian, Native American/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander and Other from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 9of14 Page 11 of31 Job Group: 06 -Administrative Support Total Employees: 62 Employees (#) Employees (%) Availability (%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (# of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male 4 6.5% 19.8% No 8 10 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 58 0 17 0 93.5% 0.0% 27.4% 0.0% 80.2% 3.2% 17.2% 5.0% Yes No Yes No 0 2 0 2 a 3 a 3 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other White Pacific Native Islander 3 0 42 4.8% 0.0% 67.7% 0.2% 4.8% 68.7% Yes No Yes 0 2 0 a 3 5 Decreased underutlization of Male, Black, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander and White from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 10of14 Other 0 0.0% 0.9% Yes 0 a Page 12 of 31 Job Group: 07 -Skilled Craft Worker Total Employees: 46 Employees (#) Employees {%) Availability{%) Meets 80/20 Rule 2017 Recruitment Goal (#of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals Male 46 100.0% 94.3% Yes 0 a City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 0 0 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 17.4% 2.2% 5.7% 4.8% 33.3% 4.3% No No No No 2 2 5 1 2 2 4 a Decreased underutlization of Other from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 11 of14 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other White Other Pacific Native Islander 1 0 36 0 2.2% 0.0% 78.3% 0.0% 0.8% 0.3% 53.6% 2.8% Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 /) 0 0 a a a 1 Page 13 of31 Job Group: 08 -Service Maintenance Total Employees: 46 Male Employees (#) 44 Employees (%) 95.7% Availability (%) 82.3% Meets 80/20 Rule Yes 2017 Recruitment Goal 0 (# of Employees Needed) 2016 Recruitment Goals 0 City of Napa Diversity Placement Goals Female Black Hispanic Asian 2 0 16 2 4.3% 0.0% 34.8% 4.3% 17.7 7.1% 39.9% 3.4% No No Yes Yes 5 3 0 0 3 4 1 0 Native Native American Hawaiian/ /Alaskan Other Pacific Native Islander 2 0 4.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 Increased underutilization of Female. Decreased underutlization of Black and Hispanic from 2016 goals. R2017-033 Page 12 of14 White Other 26 0 56.5% 0.0% 47.1% 2.2% Yes Yes 0 0 0 0 Page 14 of31 " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " 0 " " " " " " " " " LOCAL AND REGIONAL GOVERNMENT ALLIANCE ON �RACE & EQ ITV Fact Sheet: Jurisdictional Cohorts to Advance Racial Equity The Government Alliance on Race�and Eguitv (GARE)' is pleased to announce the launching two new Californi,a cohorts of governmental jurisdictions that are sy$temically advancing rac��al equity. These year� long cohorts will focus on jurisdictions in Northern and Southern California and launch in February 2017. What is the Government Alliance on Race and Equity? GARE is a national network of government working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. The Alliance uses a three-prong approach: I) Support jurisdictions that are at the forefront of work to advance racial equity. 2 ) Build pathways for new jurisdictions to begin doing racial equity work, including cohorts ofnew jurisdictions. 3) Expand and strengthen local and regional collaborations that are broadly inclusive and focused on achieving racial equity. Government's proactive work on racial equity has the potential to leverage significant change, setting the stage for the achievement of racial equity in our communities, Supporting targeted cohorts of jurisdictions and providing best practices, tools and resources is helping to build and sustain current efforts and build a national movement for racial equity. What is an Advancing Racial Equity .cohort? Over the last decade, a solid field of practice has developed that advances racial equity and transforms government. Government will not be able to advance racial equity without a fundamental transformation into an effective and inclusive democracy. The field of practice is based on the experiences of early adopters of racial equity within government. Cities and counties across the country have developed and are implementing racial equity initiatives or agendas and using racial equity tools. GARE cohorts will implement proven practices and replicate success, changing the norm of what is expected and pos�sible from government and will increase our collective impact. New jurisdictions can make use of the� field of practice and begin and expand work on institutional and structural equity. Based on the experiences ofleaders, the new cohorts will participate in a structured curriculum that focuses on strategies that normalize conversations about race, operationalize new policies and cultures, and organize to achieve racial equity. What will a jurisdiction get out of participating in a cohort? As a result of participating in the cohort, each jurisdiction will receive tools and resources, including: " A racial equity training curriculum, with cohort participants who are equipped to implement the training with other employees, " A Racial Equity Tool to be used in policy, practice, program and budget decisions, " A capacity building plan and organizational structure to institutionalize equity within their own jurisdiction, " Example policies and practices that help advance racial equity, and " A Racial Equity Action Plan Implementation of these tools and resources will vary depending on the opportunities within individual 1 Funding provided by the California Endowment I Building Healthv Communities R2017-033 Page 13of14 Page 15 of 31 jurisdictions. Technical assistance will be provided by GARE to ensure responsiveness to the local conditions of each jurisdiction. How will the cohort be structured? The structure will consist of monthly sessions, with a quarterly rotation between 1) skill building and strategy development, 2) an "Advancing Racial Equity" speaker series that connects community members to the process, and 3) peer-to-peer networking and problem solving. This quarterly rotation process allows for implementation of action steps as the year progresses. Key components of the cohort will include: • A curriculum that builds on the existing-and growing field of gov-ernmental practices to advance racial equity. Technical assistance and academic research from the Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society and members of GARE's Technical Assistance Advisory Group will be provided. • Mentors from similarly situated jurisdictions that have experience with implementation of racial equity initiatives. Mentor connections will take into account: location, size, form of government, demographics and other characteristics. The cohort as a whole will be structured to support peer-to­ peer strategizing and problem-solving. • An "Advancing Racial Equity" speaker series that will be an opportunity for cohort participants, community members and elected officials to come together to learn and strategize in the spirit of shared commitment to advancing racial equity and transforming government. • An Advanced Implementation Track for jurisdictions that participated in the 2016 Learning Year so that they can focus in on the specific strategies necessary to fulfill the elements of their Racial Equity Action Plans. What is expected from participating jurisdictions? Participating sites will: • Identify a team lead and a group of six or more employees. Teams should include governmental· leadership and staff committed to advancing racial equity and transforming government. A team of 10 tends to be sufficiently representative to move the group to action steps. For teams larger than 15 participants, please �ontact GARE for more details. Note: jurisdicitions that participated in the 2016 Learning Year have the option of nominating that team to take part in the Advanced Implementation Track while also introducing a new team of participants into the Core Training. • Complete an eQrollment form that designates their team's lead, team members, and provides information on jurisdiction specific opportunities and challenges. - • Commit to participate in the full series, including each session and completion of assignments between sessions. In-person participation is preferable, although video-conferencing may be available. Location of events will rotate between sites to maximize in-person participation. • Work with GARE and to promote the "Advancing Racial Equity" speaker series to elected officials, government staff and community partners. : , • Contribute towards the training cost (the City is participating in conjunction with the County at a cost of approximately $83 per person per session monthly). For more information, please contact Dwayne S. Marsh, dmarsh@thecsi.org or (510) 882-9147. R2017-033 Page 14of14 Page 16 of 31 Exhibit 8 The City of Napa is an Equal Opportunity Employer ti on, protections development R2017-033 recruitm t er non-m a gem otions)' an Page 2of15 factors. d practices, and Page 18 of 31 ·Recruitment and the City of Napa Employment Brand . . Talented employees reflecting the community. CITY OJ= NAPA !, \, Page 4 of 15 Page 20 of 31 .. :-:: Objective 1 Develop_ a competency based recruitment and selection method to ensure quality hires based upon job requirements. HR will collaborate with hiring managers and other subject matter experts to develop and implement selection process steps based upon the following information needed to successfully perform job activities: ii What people should know: technical and/or professional knowledge •What people have done: educational or work achievements • What people can do: s!pecific behaviors performed on a job -•Who people are: personal dispositions and motivations that relate to job satisfaction, job success or job failure according to ��t.&he City has many or few opportunities to P�i¥i�15 Objectivel Establish and strengthen relationships with community partners. • Take an active role in the Local and Regional Alliance on Race & Equity. • Partner with Regional Alliance on Race & Equity to develop strategic diversity initiatives . • Collaborate with departments to recruit through local events and professional organizations. 11 Utilize social media to reach qualified candidates. 1-� l!-1-1m I I iii!tll Equality doesn't mean R2017-033 Page 6 of 15 Equity Page 22 of 31 ·Objective 4 Develop and implement on-boarding practices to support new employees, promote inclusion and ensure job success. • Utilize competency data collected during the selection process to ensure new employees maximize competency strengths while ensuring adequate training and mentoring to develop competency gaps. • Provide training to managers on employee development and performance management._ Objective 1 Define_specific_attributes_or_factors that will be assessed_ during performance review. • Collaborate with bargaining groups and management team to enhance the performance management process and forms to focus on strategies for career development. • Inform employees of job expectations and competency growth . . . . • Implement workforce planning meetings prior to budget development. • Conduct training for managers and employees once a new evaluation process is introduced. Page 9of15 Page 25 of 31 R2017-033 ·----- ----- ----obje ctive--1 Enhance inclusion, communication, recognition and strive for continuous improvement. • Review policies, rules and Charter language to identify, examine and address institutional implicit bias. • Conduct "stay interviews" to better understand the needs and values of employees and create an action plan to retain talent. • Develop recognition programs to celebrate performance successes. Page 11of15 Page 27 of 31 ___ / Objective 1 Provide annual reports regarding recruitment and selection progress Citywide. • Review progress with each department manager and set goals for outreach and inclusion. • Consistently evaluate recrui_tment and selection methods to mitigate adverse impact of under-represented groups. ., \. ,, R2017-033 Page 13 of15 \, Objec.tive 2 Develop multiple sources of data collection to monitor progress. • Applicant tracking system. • Human Resource Information System (IFAS ). • Employee and candidate feedback. • Number of trainings, meetings, policy and procedure changes that promote equity and inclusion. • Track community data through the US Census and local economic development resources. • Utilize community partnerships to measure progress on inclusion across the Region. Page 29 of 31 Civil Service Rule 4 Part K states that the Civil Service Commission shall submit an annual Equal Employment Opportunity report to the City Council. Please see the attached report to view the 2016 workplace statistics. R2017-033 Page 14of15 Moving Forward 1, R2017-033 Page 15of15 Page 31of31