HomeMy Public PortalAbout04 April 1, 1998 Budget and Finance041215
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
•
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
(COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM KLEINDIENST, JACK VAN HAASTER, JIM VENABLE)
12:30 P.M.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1998
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
3560 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 100
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
4. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL ITEMS.
5A. Environmentally Sensitive Corridor
Overview
That the Commission direct staff to work with Dangermond & Associates and Bechtel
to develop scoping documents to address the CETAP study that would environmentally
clear the future corridors required in Western Riverside County and identify sensitive
habitat areas that should be preserved. Authorize an initial contract with Dangermond
& Associates not to exceed $25,000 to cover the scoping effort using a standard RCTC
consultant contract and bring back to the Commission a proposed scope of work,
schedule of services, and project cost for review and approval.
5B. Monthly Cost and Schedule Reports
Overview
Material depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts reported by routes,
commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each
contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the
Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and the project
expenditures by route with status for the month ending February 29, 1998. This item
is for receive and file.
6. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/BICYCLE.
6A. FY 1998 State Transit Assistance Incentive Bonus
Overview
This agenda item is requesting that the $241,852 in State Transit Assistance
discretionary funds that had been set aside for use as an incentive bonus in FY
1998 be allocated on the population formula basis to each apportionment area,
consistent with State TDA guidelines. Additionally, the Transit Operators are
requesting that no 10% bonus be set aside for FY 1999 and that the full
discretionary pot be allocated on the population. basis.
Page 2
Agenda - Budget/Finance Committee
April 1, 1998
6B. Meditrans Services -Request for Measure A Western County Specialized Transit
Capital Matching Funds.
Overview
That the Commission approve allocation of $50,900 in Measure A Specialized
Transit funds available in the Western Riverside County to Meditrans Services to
be used as the required 20% federal match for the purchase of four replacement
vehicles, one expansion vehicle and five mobile radio units.
7. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
7A. Award Construction Contract for Sound Walis on State Route 91 between Van Buren
Blvd. to Mary Street.
Overview
That the Commission award a construction contract for the project to the lowest
responsive bidder. Staff's recommendation of the lowest responsive bidder will be
presented to the Commission at the April 8, 1998 meeting.
7B. Approval to Advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) to Provide Support for Construction
Support Services Related to Landscaping Projects on State Route 91 and Yuma Drive
Interchange.
Overview
That the Commission direct Staff to advertise and select a qualified firm to provide
Landscaping On -Call services to support the construction management activities related
to the construction of landscaping for the State Route 91 Noise Walis and the Yuma
Interchange. Following the selection process, Staff will negotiate a cost for the scope
of services with the selected firm to deliver the required PS&E package. The results of
the selection process, scope of services and cost to perform the work will be brought
back to the Commission for review and approval.
7C. Completion of the State Route 79 Realignment Study through the Cities of Hemet and
San Jacinto.
Overview
Staff is recommending that the Commission receive and file the State Route 79
Realignment Study and direct staff to study funding alternatives for the Project Study
Report, Project Report, and Environmental Clearance Studies.
8. RAIL.
8A. Award Amendment No. 2 to F.R. Harris Agreement RO-9731.
Overview
Award Amendment No. 2 to F.R. Harris Agreement RO-9731 to provide additional
compensation for additional plan check work, provide additional Construction Support
Services for the new Electrical/Mechanical/Security System/CCTV Construction Support
Inspection Services.
Page 3
Agenda - Budget/Finance Committee
April 1, 1998
•
•
9. SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES
9A. Cooperative Agreement Between the State of California Department of Transportation
and Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies for Freeway Service
Patrol Program in Riverside County.
Overview
The amendment to the cooperative agreement with the State of California Department
of Transportation provides for an additional $4,500 in funding for the Riverside County
Freeway Service Patrol program for FY 1997-98, or an annual total of 8500,100. The
Riverside County SAFE must provide matching funds of $125,025 (20%).
10. ADJOURNMENT.
000003
"
"
"
"
M I N U T E S
M A R C H 4 , 1 9 9 8
"
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
t
•
•
MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The meeting of the Budget and Finance Committee was called to order by Commissioner Jack
van Haaster at 12:30 p.m. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission Conference
Room, 3560 University Avenue, Riverside.
Members Present
Will Kleindienst
Jack van Haaster
Jim Venable
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
M/S/C (Kliendienst/Venable) to approve the minutes of the January 14, 1998 Budget and
Finance Committee meeting.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
There were no public comments at this time.
4. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
There were no additions or revisions to the agenda.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL ITEMS.
5A. Video and Audio Conferencing Equipment
Naty Kopenhaver presented the proposal to purchase video and audio conferencing
equipment for the conference room. She explained that as of January 1, 1998,
legislation took effect that allows participation at public meetings by audio/video
teleconference. At the February meeting, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-
01, the resolution governs the use of audio and video conferencing equipment at RCTC
meetings. Staff worked with Ken Lobec of Coachella Valley Association of
Governments, Bob Spilsbury of GTE (County of Riverside vendor), and Jim Boatwright,
County of Riverside, to determine a proposal for audio and video conferencing
equipment for the Commission. Based on the conference room layout, the Concorde
4500 system unit is proposed. It includes three power microphones, two monitors (one
facing the conference table and one facing the audience), a power camera that can
either be programmed for voice activation or using the look -at -me feature. It was
determined that the look -at -me feature, rather than the voice -activated feature, would
work best for the Commission because of the number of participants at its meetings
and the resulting background noise. The voice -activated equipment functions by sound
and the camera tends to focus in the direction of where the sounds are coming from.
This feature could be difficult to manage with a large number of participants and
audience attending the meetings. However, in those instances when the voice -
activated feature is selected, the two cameras can be used to to focus on more than
one participant. The Look -at -me feature can also be used to provide more control on
the focal point of the two cameras. With the two options, staff could determine the
best option to use.
Commissioner Venable questioned how many staff members and Commissioners would
utilize this video/audio conferencing capability. Commissioner Kleindienst said that -hg
Page 2
Minutes - Budget/Finance Committee
March 4, 1998
would utilize it, especially with the travel time involved in getting to this meeting and
the amount of time it normally lasts.
Commissioner Kleindienst asked about the "bridging" capability of this system so that
more than one person would be able to utilize it at a time. Ms. Kopenhaver replied that
at this time "bridging" is done by GTE and the cost is over 5100,000.
Chairman van Haaster said that this request is possibly premature because as the
technology becomes more readily available the costs will decrease. There are other
facilities that can be used if the capability is needed and tele-conferencing is still an
option.
M/S/C (Venable/van Haaster) oppose the purchase of the Concorde 4500 audio and
video conference equipment, including installation and maintenance for one year at
$73,955.10.
Commissioner Kleindienst voted no.
5B. Bi-Annual Measure A Sales Tax Projections
M/S/C (Venable/Kliendienst) approve contracting with Ernst & Young to complete
the 1998 Measure A sales tax projects in an amount not to exceed $45,000.
5C. FY98 Revised Budget
M/S/C (van HaasterNenable) approve the revised budget for fiscal year 1997/98.
5D. Quarterly Financial Reports
M/S/C (van HaasterNenable) to receive and file the Combining Statements of
Revenues and Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (Unaudited) and the
Highway and rail projects quarterly budget report for the Quarter Ending December
31
6. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
6A. City of Murrieta Request to Transfer Surface Transportation Program Discretionary
Funds
M/S/C (van Haaster/Kleindienst) to approve the transfer of Surface Transportation
Program (STP) discretionary and formula funds from previously programmed
projects on Jefferson Avenue to another programmed project on Murrieta Hot
Springs Road.
6B. Award of Contract to Engineering Resources for Completion of Gene Autry Trail Plans,
Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for State Route 111.
M/S/C (Venable/Kleindienst) approve awarding a contract to Engineering Resources
to complete the Gene Autry Trail PS&E for an amount of $11,529.52 with an extra
work amount of $2,470.48 for any contingencies for a total amount not to exceed
$14,000.
•
•
110
000005
Page 3
Minutes - Budget/Finance Committee
March 4, 1998
•
•
•
6C. Approval to Advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) to develop the Plans.
Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) for the Phase II Noise Walls on State Route 91.
M/S/C (KleindienstNenable) to direct Staff to advertise and select a qualified firm
to prepare the Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) for the Phase II Noise Wall
and Auxiliary Lane Project between Magnolia and Mary Streets.
6D. Joint Application to the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee
(MSRC) for SR 91 High Occupancy Toll Lane Feasibility/Air Quality Monitoring
Demonstration.
M/S/C (Venable/Kleindienst) to authorize SCAG and CE-CERT to resubmit the joint
application, and provide a commitment of $80,000 LTF planning funds as a cash
match, if the MSRC approves the proposal.
Chairman van Haaster questioned the need to have legal counsel present at the Budget and
Finance Committee meetings. Staff explained that this was the preference of the former
Executive Director and allows legal counsel to be present if there are any Brown Act issues or
any other miscellaneous legal questions. This issue can be discussed with the new Executive
Director once he comes on board.
7. ADJOURNMENT.
There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Finance Committee, the
meeting was adjourned at 1:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Natye-----6- pehk ver
Clerk of the Commission
003006
"
AGENDA ITEM 5A
•
"
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
A p r i l 1 , 1 9 9 8
T O :
B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
P a u l B l a c k w e l d e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
E n v i r o n m e n t a l l y S e n s i t i v e C o r r i d o r P l a n n i n g P r o c e s s
A t t h e S e p t e m b e r 1 0 , 1 9 9 7 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g , a p r e s e n t a t i o n w a s m a d e b y
C o m m i s s i o n e r T o m M u l l e n , M a r k P i s a n o t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r o f S C A G , a n d P e t e
D a n g e r m o n d o f D a n g e r m o n d & A s s o c i a t e s r e g a r d i n g a p r o p o s e d p r o c e s s t o
e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r f u t u r e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o r r i d o r s i n W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y .
T h e p r o c e s s p r o p o s e d h a s b e e n c o i n e d t h e C o m m u n i t y & E n v i r o n m e n t a l A p p r o v a l
P r o c e s s ( C E T A P ) . S t a f f w a s d i r e c t e d t o b r i n g b a c k a n i t e m f o r C o m m i s s i o n
c o n s i d e r a t i o n r e g a r d i n g f u n d i n g s u c h a p r o c e s s .
T h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y A r e a f a c e s a c r i t i c a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o b l e m . T h e a r e a
l a c k s t h e r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n i n f r a s t r u c t u r e n e c e s s a r y t o : s u p p o r t e c o n o m i c
d e v e l o p m e n t ; p r o t e c t e x i s t i n g e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y s e n s i t i v e h a b i t a t s a n d ; p r o v i d e a c c e s s
t o r e c r e a t i o n o p p o r t u n i t i e s i n t o t h e 2 1 ' t C e n t u r y . T h e r e i s l i m i t e d f u n d i n g t o h a n d l e
t h e s e n s i t i v e n a t u r e o f t h e R i v e r s i d e ' s e n v i r o n m e n t a l d e m a n d f o r p r u d e n t m e t h o d s o f
d e v e l o p m e n t t h a t w i l l a d d r e s s t h e s e c o n c e r n s .
M a r k P i s a n o i n d i c a t e d t h e g r o w t h i n p o p u l a t i o n i n t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y A r e a
a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o o v e r t h e n e x t 2 0 y e a r s w i l l e x c e e d 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 p e o p l e w i t h a
p r o j e c t e d i n c r e a s e i n a v a i l a b l e j o b s o f o n l y 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 . T h e r e f o r e , t h e p e r c e n t a g e o f
c o m m u t e r s m a k i n g o n e h o u r p l u s t r i p s t o n e i g h b o r i n g O r a n g e a n d L . A . C o u n t i e s w i l l
d o u b l e a n d t r i p l e o v e r t h e n e x t 2 0 y e a r s . T h e p r e s e n t t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m w i t h i n
t h e r e g i o n d o e s n o t h a v e s u f f i c i e n t c a p a c i t y t o h a n d l e t h e t r a f f i c m o v e m e n t n e c e s s a r y
f o r t h e e a s t / w e s t c o m m u t e .
P e t e D a n g e r m o n d o u t l i n e d t h e b a s i c c o n c e p t s t o c o n s i d e r d u r i n g a p r o c e s s t o o b t a i n
a p p r o v a l o f a p l a n t h a t w o u l d p r o v i d e a s o l u t i o n t o t r a n s p o r t a t i o n n e e d s o f t h e f u t u r e
w h i l e m a i n t a i n i n g s e n s i t i v i t y t o e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y s e n s i t i v e a r e a s . T h e p r o c e s s w o u l d
h a v e t o c o n s i d e r d i f f e r e n t m o d e s s u c h a s f r e e w a y s , l i g h t r a i l , h e a v y r a i l , s p e c i a l t r u c k
l a n e s , s p e c i a l t r u c k / t r a i n r e l a t i o n s h i p s , p a r k w a y s , a r t e r i a l s , e t c . T h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l
c o n s e q u e n c e s o f e a c h a l t e r n a t i v e w o u l d b e c a r e f u l l y e v a l u a t e d d u r i n g t h e p r o c e s s ,
a n d a l l s t a k e h o l d e r s a n d i n t e r e s t e d p a r t i e s w o u l d h a v e t o b e i n c l u d e d i n o r d e r t o
o b t a i n a p p r o v a l o f t h e c o r r i d o r s a n d a l t e r n a t i v e s .
S t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h o u l d m o v e f o r w a r d t o w a r d d e v e l o p i n g a
p l a n t o a d d r e s s t h e f u t u r e c o r r i d o r n e e d s o f W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y t h r o u g h a
p r o c e s s w h i c h i d e n t i f i e s a c c e p t a b l e i m p r o v e m e n t s t o e x i s t i n g c o r r i d o r s a s w e l l a s n e w
0 0 0 0 0 7
corridors to be developed. In addition, sensitive environmental areas should be
identified for future preservation efforts. If agreement can be obtained for the
necessary corridor improvements and habitat preservation in a combined process, the
time necessary to obtain all of the necessary approvals could be greatly reduced. A
further advantage of having necessary corridor improvements identified and cleared,
at least to a Tier I level of approval, would be that it would greatly assist future
efforts to‘obtainfunding for the needed improvements. Proceeding with this planning
study at this time will allow us to coordinate this study with general plan updates of
the County and Cities that are impacted, and the development of an Expenditure Plan
for extending the local sales tax for transportation programs. Once the corridors and
habitat areas have been identified and agreed upon, the impacted general plans will
need to be updated to incorporate the appropriate land use and arterial feeder
systems.
The actual details of the cost and schedule of such an undertaking is unknown at this
time. Staff recommends that a scoping effort be authorized by the Commission.
Funding for the scoping effort could be obtained by redirecting TDA Planning funding
currently remaining from the recently completed Corona By Pass study. Funding for
the actual study could come from a combination of several sources including the 2%
planning money established by SB45. Staff would propose working with Dangermond
& Associates to prepare the scoping documents for this effort since they have been
at the forefront of this effort to move the CETAP process forward. In addition,
Bechtel can make Mike Davis, the previous Environmental Manager for RCTC,
available to assist in the scoping effort. His services, through June 1998, can be
covered under the current Bechtel Agreement with RCTC.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
Initial cost $25,000 for Dangermond & Associates
Bechtel contract costs can be addressed within the current
contract limits.
Source of Funds
TDA funds previously identified for the Corona By Pass
Corridor Study.
r
`vi.S•' a j{{•}.v '.:ti.. •r iFi i. :'
h :'x4C•
l y;,..r
•
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
y
Year
Included in Program Budget
y
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
y
Financial Impact Not Applicable
•
•
•
000008
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
•
•
•
That the Commission direct:
1. Staff to work with Dangermond & Associates and Bechtel to develop scoping
documents to address the CETAP study that would environmentally clear the
future corridors required in Western Riverside County and identify sensitive
habitat areas that should be preserved.
2. Authorization of an initial contract with Dangermond & Associates not to
exceed $25,000 to cover the scoping efforts using a standard RCTC consultant
contract.
3. Staff to bring back to the Commission a proposed scope of work, schedule of
services, and project cost for review and approval.
AGENDA ITEM 5B
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
A p r i l 1 , 1 9 9 8
T O :
B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
W i l l i a m H u g h e s , M e a s u r e A P r o j e c t M a n a g e r
L o u i s M a r t i n , P r o j e c t C o n t r o l s M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
M o n t h l y C o s t a n d S c h e d u l e R e p o r t s
T h e a t t a c h e d m a t e r i a l d e p i c t s t h e c u r r e n t c o s t s a n d s c h e d u l e s t a t u s o f c o n t r a c t s
r e p o r t e d b y r o u t e s , c o m m i t m e n t s , a n d c o o p e r a t i v e a g r e e m e n t s e x e c u t e d b y t h e
C o m m i s s i o n . F o r e a c h c o n t r a c t a n d a g r e e m e n t , t h e r e p o r t l i s t s t h e a u t h o r i z e d v a l u e
a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , p e r c e n t a g e o f c o n t r a c t a m o u n t e x p e n d e d t o d a t e , a n d
t h e p r o j e c t e x p e n d i t u r e s b y r o u t e w i t h s t a t u s f o r t h e m o n t h e n d i n g F e b r u a r y
2 8 , 1 9 9 8 .
D e t a i l e d s u p p o r t i n g m a t e r i a l f o r a l l s c h e d u l e s , c o n t r a c t s a n d c o o p e r a t i v e a g r e e m e n t s
i s a v a i l a b l e f r o m B e c h t e l s t a f f .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e a n d f i l e .
A t t a c h m e n t s
0 0 0 0 1 0
"
P R O J E C T
D E S C R I P T I O N
R O U T E 6 0 P R O J E C T S
P a r k ' n ' R i d e L o t F i n a l D e s i g n ( R 0 9 7 3 8 )
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 6 0
R O U T E 7 9 P R O J E C T S
E n g i n e e r i n g / E n v i r o n . / R O W
( R 0 9 1 1 1 , 9 3 0 1 , 9 3 0 2 , 9 3 0 6 , 9 3 3 7 , 9 7 3 5 , 9 3 2 9 , 9 7 3 7 )
P r o j e c t i s C o m p l e t e . P e r f o r m i n g p r o j e c t c l o s e -
o u t t a s k s a n d c o n s u l t a n t p e r f o r m i n g o n - g o i n g
e n v i r o n m e n t a l i n s p e c t i o n s .
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 7 9
R O U T E 1 1 1 P R O J E C T S
( R 0 9 2 1 9 , 9 2 2 7 , 9 2 3 4 , 9 5 2 3 , 9 5 2 5 , 9 5 3 0 , 9 5 3 7 , 9 5 3 8 )
9 6 3 5
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 1 1 1
R O U T E 9 1 P R O J E C T S
S o u n d w a l l d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n
( R 0 9 1 0 1 , 9 3 3 7 , 9 8 2 8 )
V a n B u r e n B l v d . F r w y H o o k R a m p ( R 0 9 5 3 5 )
C o r o n a B y p a s s S t u d y ( R 0 9 7 3 6 )
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 9 1
1 - 2 1 6 P R O J E C T S
P r e l i m i n a r y E n g r g / E n v i r o n . ( R 0 9 0 0 8 , 9 0 1 8 )
S U B T O T A L 1 - 2 1 6
R C T C M E A S U R E " A " H I G H W A Y / R A I L P R O J E C T S
B U D G E T R E P O R T B Y R O U T E
C O M M I S S I O N C O N T R A C T U R A L
A U T H O R I Z E D C O M M I T M E N T S
A L L O C A T I O N T O D A T E
$ 3 9 , 6 9 7 $ 3 9 , 6 9 7
$ 3 9 , 6 9 7 3 3 0 ; 6 9 7
$ 9 , 6 9 6 , 3 6 0
$ 9 , 6 9 6 , 3 6 0
3 9 , 6 9 6 , 3 6 0 3 9 , 6 9 6 , 3 6 0 ;
$ 6 , 7 0 0 , 1 1 5
3 6 , 7 0 0 , 1 1 6
$ 2 , 6 0 8 , 4 2 4
$ 2 , 3 0 0 , 0 0 0
6 6 , 4 3 8 , 6 1 6
$ 6 , 4 3 8 ; 6 1 6
$ 2 , 5 3 9 , 5 1 9
$ 2 , 3 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 6 9 , 2 2 0 $ 1 6 9 , 2 2 0
5 5 , 0 7 7 , 6 4 4 3 6 , 0 0 8 ; 7 3 9
6 6 , 7 2 6 , 5 0 4
$ 6 , 7 2 6 , 5 0 4
$ 5 , 8 7 8 , 1 7 3
$ 6 , 8 7 8 ; 1 7 3
P a g e 1 o f 3
% C O M M I T T E D E X P E N D I T U R E F O R % E X P E N D I T U R E S
A G A I N S T A U T H . M O N T H E N D E D E X P E N D I T U R E S T O - D A T E A G A I N S T
A L L O C A T I O N F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 9 8 T O D A T E C O M M I T M N T S T O D A T E
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 % S 0
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 6 . 1 %
9 6 . i %
9 7 . 4 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 8 . 6 %
8 7 . 4 %
8 7 . 4 %
$ 8 , 4 8 2
$ 1 2 8 , 4 3 5
6 3 9 , 4 0 7
$ 1 6 7 , 8 4 2
$ 1 , 7 0 4
$ 1 , 7 0 4 ;
6 3 9 , 5 7 0
$ 3 9 , 5 7 0 > i
$ 9 , 6 2 7 , 8 1 0
3 9 , 6 2 7 , 8 1 0 '
$ 4 , 9 9 3 , 2 0 5
$ 4 ; 9 9 3 , 2 0 6
$ 7 2 7 , 4 7 4
$ 1 , 2 2 9 , 4 4 2
$ 1 3 5 , 0 9 5
3 2 ; 0 9 2 , 0 ' 1 1 .
$ 5 , 6 9 7 , 7 5 7
6 6 , 6 9 7 , 7 6 7
9 9 . 7 %
9 9 . 7 %
9 9 . 3 %
9 9 . 3 %
7 7 . 6 %
7 7 . 6 %
2 8 . 6 %
5 3 . 5 %
7 9 . 8 %
4 1 . 8 %
9 6 . 9 %
8 6 : 9 1 1 1
"
R C T C M E A S U R E " A " H I G O J E C T S
B U D G E T R E P O R T B Y R
C O M M I S S I O N C O N T R A C T U R A L % C O M M I T T E D E X P E N D I T U R E F O R % E X P E N D I T U R E S
P R O J E C T A U T H O R I Z E D C O M M I T M E N T S A G A I N S T A U T H . M O N T H E N D E D E X P E N D I T U R E S T O - D A T E A G A I N S T
D E S C R I P T I O N A L L O C A T I O N T O D A T E A L L O C A T I O N F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 9 8 T O D A T E C O M I T M N T S T O D A T E
I N T E R C H A N G E I M P R O V . P R O G R A M
Y u m a I C F i n a l D e s i g n ( P S & E ) ( R 0 9 4 2 8 )
Y u m a I C C o n s t r . M g m t ( R 0 9 6 3 1 )
Y u m a I C C o n s t r u c t i o n ( R 0 9 6 3 6 )
( P r o j e c t i s c o m p l e t e - d o i n g c o n t r a c t
c l o s e - o u t )
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S U B T O T A L I N T E R C H A N G E ;
P R O J E C T & C O N S T R . M G M T S E R V .
( R 0 9 8 0 0 )
S U B T O T A L S E C i i 7 E .
P R O G R A M P L A N & S E R V I C E S
S p e c i a l S t u d y ( I T S P l a n - R 0 9 7 2 7 )
S U B T O T A L , P R O G R A M P L A N S i S V C S
P A R K - N - R I D E / I N C E N T . P R O G R A M
( R O 9 8 0 1 t h r u 9 8 1 2 ) ( 9 7 0 1 - 9 7 1 2 ) ( 9 7 4 0 - 9 7 4 2 )
S U B T O T A L ; P A R K - N " R I D E
C O M M U T E R R A I L
S t u d i e s / E n g i n e e r i n g
( R O 9 4 2 0 , 9 7 3 1 , 9 8 3 2 , 9 8 3 3 )
S t a t i o n / S i t e A c q / O P C o s t s / M a i n t . C o s t s
( R O 0 0 0 0 , 9 8 2 0 , 9 8 4 3 , 9 8 4 5 )
S U B T O T A L C O M M U T E R R A I L .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
? f O T A L S :
$ 1 , 2 9 4 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 0 2 3 , 5 0 0
$ 6 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0
8 8 . 8 1 7 , 5 0 0
$ 1 , 9 7 4 , 8 1 3
$ 1 , 9 7 4 , 5 3
$ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0
5 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 6 8 3 , 2 8 0
1 , 8 8 3 , 2 8 $ 1
$ 1 , 4 3 3 , 2 0 2
$ 9 , 2 0 7 , 5 0 2
8 1 0 , 5 4 0 , 7 0 4
$ 5 1 , 9 0 6 , 6 1 7
$ 1 , 2 9 4 , 0 0 0
$ 9 8 8 , 0 5 0
$ 6 , 3 0 4 , 6 4 9
$ $ , 5 8 6 , 6 8 8 '
$ 1 , 9 0 4 , 8 1 3
$ 1 , 9 0 F , 8 1 3 j
$ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0
4 5 0 , 0 . 0 0 '
$ 1 , 6 8 3 , 2 8 0
$ 1 , 6 8 3 , 2 8 0
$ 1 , 2 9 2 , 3 5 4
$ 8 , 2 2 6 , 0 0 0
$ 9 . , 5 1 8 , 3 5 4
$ 4 9 , 2 0 4 , 7 3 1
P a g e 2 o f 3
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 6 . 5 %
9 5 . 5 %
9 L 3 %
9 6 . 5 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 4 %
9 0 . 2 %
8 9 . 3 %
8 8 ' : 5 %
8 4 . 8 %
$ 4 , 4 3 4
$ 4 , 4 3 4
$
$ 1 , 9 6 6
$ 1 , 9 8 6
$ 1 9 4 , 7 7 7
$ 1 9 4 , 7 7 7 .
$ 4 1 , 3 2 3
$ 3 4 , 5 1 8
$ 7 5 , 8 4 1 '
$ 4 5 5 , 0 4 6
$ 1 , 2 8 4 , 6 7 2
$ 9 8 8 , 4 5 5
$ 6 , 2 5 9 , 6 4 9
$ 8 , 5 3 2 , 7 7 6
$ 7 4 5 , 1 4 9
$ 7 ' 4 5 ; 1 4 9
$ 3 2 2 , 5 7 5
$ 3 2 2 , 5 7 5
$ 8 0 8 , 8 5 1
$ 8 . . 0 8 , 8 5 1
$ 1 , 0 6 7 , 7 2 0
$ 4 8 6 , 4 4 4
$ 1 , 5 5 4 , 1 5 4
$ 3 4 , 4 1 3 " 8 6 $
9 9 . 3 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 9 . 3 %
8 8 4 %
3 9 . 1 %
7 1 . 7 %
4 8 . 1 %
5 8 . 1 . %
8 2 . 6 %
5 . 9 %
1 6 . 3 %
6 9 . 8 %
"
"
P R O J E C T
D E S C R I P T I O N
C I T Y O F M U R R I E T A
L o a n A g r e e m e n t 1 - 1 5 / 1 - 2 1 5
I n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t s ( R 0 9 3 3 4 )
( L o a n A g r e e m e n t i s T e r m i n a t e d )
S U S T o r A L M U R R I E T A L O A N
C I T Y O F C A N Y O N L A K E
F i n a l D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n o f
R a i l r o a d C a n y o n R d I m p r o v e m e n t s ( R 0 9 4 2 2 )
S U B T O T A L C A N Y O N L A K E L O A N
C I T Y O F C O R O N A
S m i t h , M a p l e & L i n c o l n I n t e r c h a n g e s &
S t o r m d r a i n a g e s t r u c t u r e
S U B T O T A L C I T Y O F C O R O N A
C I T Y O F P E R R I S
L o c a l s t r e e t s & r o a d i m p r o v e m e n t s
C I T Y O F S A N J A C I N T O
L o c a l s t r e e t s & r o a d i m p r o v e m e n t s
C I T Y O F T E M E C U L A
L o c a l s t r e e t s & r o a d i m p r o v e m e n t s
T O T A L S
$ 5 , 0 9 4 , 0 2 7
1 3 2 , 1 0 7 5 8 9
N O T E : ( 1 ) L o a n a g a i n s t i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m s .
A l l v a l u e s a r e f o r t o t a l P r o j e c t / C o n t r a c t a n d n o t r e l a t e d t o f i s c a l y e a r b u d g e t s .
' T o t a l a d v a n c e s o f $ 1 . 3 7 7 M r e p r e s e n t s t h e t o t a l M e a s u r e " A " p r e v i o u s a d v a n c e s u n d e r t h i s a g r e e m e n t . T h i s a m t . w a s p a i d i n f u l l b y C i t y o f M u r r i e t a
N o v e m b e r 1 9 9 5 .
( 1 )
R C T C M E A S U R E " A " H I G H W A Y / L O C A L S T R E E T S & R O A D S P R O J E C T S
B U D G E T R E P O R T B Y P R O J E C T
E X P E N D I T U R E F O R T O T A L
A P P R O V E D M O N T H E N D E D M E A S U R E " A "
C O M M I T M E N T F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 9 8 A D V A N C E S
$ 1 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1
$ 1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 5 , 2 1 2 , 6 2 3
8 5 , 2 1 2 , 8 2 3
$ 1 , 9 3 6 , 4 1 9
8 1 , 3 2 4 , 5 0 0
0
$ 0
0
$ 1 , 3 7 7 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 3 7 7 , 0 0 0
8 1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0
$ 1 , 8 0 0 , 0 0 0
8 5 , 2 1 2 , 6 2 3
$ 5 , 2 1 2 ; 5 2 3 .
$ 1 , 9 3 6 , 4 1 9
8 1 , 3 2 4 , 5 0 0
O U T S T A N D I N G % E X P E N D I T U R E S
L O A N O U T S T A N D I N G T O - D A T E A G A I N S T
B A L A N C E C O M M I T M E N T A P P R O V E D C O M M I T .
$ 0
8 0
8 1 , 4 1 9 , 8 3 0
0 1 , 4 1 9 , 0 3 0
8 4 , 4 8 7 , 0 1 1
$ 0 0 . 0 1 4
8 1 , 8 6 3 , 8 0 6
8 1 , 2 7 4 , 8 3 3
8 0
$ 0
$ o
$ 0
8 0
8 . 1 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
8 0
$ 5 , 0 9 4 , 0 2 7
$ 1 6 , 6 4 4 ; 6 6 9
$ 4 , 9 0 3 , 0 0 9
$ 1 3 , 9 4 8 , 4 8 0 ' ,
$ 0
P a g e 3 o f 3
1 0 0 . 0 %
S t a t u s M o . E n d i n g 0 2 / 2 8 / 8
"
"
"
A G E N D A I T E M 6 A
r
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
A p r i l 1 , 1 9 9 8
T O :
B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
C a t h y B e c h t e l , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
F Y 1 9 9 8 S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e I n c e n t i v e B o n u s
I n D e c e m b e r 1 9 9 5 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d a p o l i c y t o a l l o c a t e 9 0 % o f t h e S t a t e
T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e ( S T A ) f u n d s b a s e d o n p o p u l a t i o n t o e a c h a p p o r t i o n m e n t a r e a ,
c o n s i s t e n t w i t h S t a t e T D A g u i d e l i n e s . I t w a s a l s o a p p r o v e d t o s e t a s i d e 1 0 % o f t h e
f u n d s o f f t h e t o p f o r a l l o c a t i o n o n a n i n c e n t i v e a w a r d b a s i s . I n F Y 1 9 9 8 , $ 2 4 1 , 8 5 2
w a s s e t a s i d e f o r t h i s i n c e n t i v e a w a r d a n d t h e C o m m i s s i o n w a s a d v i s e d t h a t t h e
t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s w o u l d b e c o n v e n e d t o d e v e l o p a p r o p o s a l o n h o w t o a w a r d t h e
b o n u s t h i s y e a r .
T h e o p e r a t o r s m e t o n M a r c h 1 6 a n d t h e y a r e r e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t t h i s 1 0 % b o n u s
m o n e y b e t h r o w n b a c k i n t o t h e p o t a n d a l l o c a t e d o n t h e p o p u l a t i o n f o r m u l a b a s i s a s
i s d o n e w i t h t h e b a l a n c e o f t h e d i s c r e t i o n a r y S T A f u n d s . T h i s w o u l d m a k e $ 1 8 4 , 4 3 6
a v a i l a b l e t o t h e W e s t e r n C o u n t y a r e a ( w h i c h w o u l d b e f u r t h e r d i v i d e d 8 0 / 2 0 b e t w e e n
b u s a n d r a i l p e r C o m m i s s i o n p o l i c y ) , $ 5 3 , 3 5 6 a v a i l a b l e i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y , a n d
$ 4 , 0 6 0 i n t h e P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y . T h e y a l s o a r e r e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t n o 1 0 % b o n u s
b e s e t a s i d e f o r F Y 1 9 9 9 ; t h e y w o u l d p r e f e r t h a t t h e f u l l d i s c r e t i o n a r y p o t b e a l l o c a t e d
o n t h e p o p u l a t i o n b a s i s s o t h a t t h e y c a n m o r e a p p r o p r i a t e l y p l a n f o r t h e u s e o f t h e
f u n d s i n F Y 1 9 9 9 .
F i n a n c i a l A s s e s s m e n t
P r o j e c t C o s t
$ 2 4 1 , 8 5 2
S o u r c e o f F u n d s
S t a t e
: i i i : e : - : , .
r l
T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d s
: _ . . , . . .
} " . . h J r �� } , , . { { . . " 4 0 i ��: l + . , , ' $ } r : W O } Y ; .
' i ' �� ��J . ' r ` j } } , A C G
. . \ M :
. . " : { : r t e ^ ' 1 : - $ : : : . / . " : m : : " . . . r r i , , , ��: : : { . { , . . .
: : " : v ' , . . : 0 * . . . " i : : ��' { y , v �� , \ " r { . . 0 " ��f - ' { 3 : ? ; ; ' ; . " ��f
i ' : : ��r { ' " ��. : ��" . . : : " : i 4 { : : i : ' 7 C i r " n , v . , ' �� . . . . n v
I n c l u d e d i n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t
Y
Y e a r
I n c l u d e d i n P r o g r a m B u d g e t
Y e a r P r o g r a m m e d
A p p r o v e d A l l o c a t i o n
Y
Y e a r o f A l l o c a t i o n
9 8
B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t R e q u i r e d
N
F i n a n c i a l I m p a c t N o t A p p l i c a b l e
Q 0
0 1 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission:
1) Allocate the $241,852 in State Transit Assistance discretionary funds using the
population formula basis as was done with the balance of the discretionary
funds for FY 1998, and
2) That the entire discretionary pot of State Transit Assistance funds available in
FY 1999 be allocated based on population to each apportionment area,
consistent with State TDA guidelines.
000015
AGENDA ITEM 6B
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E
C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
A p r i l 1 , 1 9 9 8
T O :
B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
C a t h y B e c h t e l , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
M e d i t r a n s S e r v i c e s - - R e q u e s t f o r M e a s u r e A W e s t e r n
S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t C a p i t a l M a t c h i n g F u n d s
C o u n t y
M e d i t r a n s S e r v i c e s p r o v i d e s i n t e r - c i t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e f o r s e n i o r s a n d p e r s o n s
w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s f r o m t h e S o u t h C o u n t y t o R i v e r s i d e a n d L o m a L i n d a , a s w e l l a s
s e r v i c e b e t w e e n H e m e t / S a n J a c i n t o a n d t h e S o u t h C o u n t y . T h e y w e r e r e c e n t l y
n o t i f i e d b y C a l t r a n s t h a t t h e y h a v e b e e n a p p r o v e d f o r $ 2 5 4 , 5 0 0 i n f u n d i n g u n d e r t h e
F T A S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0 p r o g r a m ( f o r m a l l y . k n o w n a s S e c t i o n 1 6 ) f o r f o u r r e p l a c e m e n t
v e h i c l e s a n d o n e e x p a n s i o n v e h i c l e , a l l w i t h m o b i l e r a d i o u n i t s . . T h e S e c t i o n 5 3 1 0
p r o g r a m p r o v i d e s 8 0 % o f t h e c o s t o f t h e c a p i t a l p r o j e c t ( $ 2 0 3 , 6 0 0 ) . M e d i t r a n s
S e r v i c e s i s r e q u e s t i n g t h a t t h e r e q u i r e d 2 0 % m a t c h ( $ 5 0 , 9 0 0 ) b e f u n d e d f r o m
M e a s u r e A S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t f u n d s a v a i l a b l e i n t h e w e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y .
T h i s r e q u e s t i s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e R C T C a d o p t e d p o l i c i e s f o r t h e M e a s u r e A
S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t P r o g r a m a n d s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s a p p r o v a l o f t h i s r e q u e s t .
F i n a n c i a l A s s e s s m e n t
P r o j e c t C o s t
$ 5 0 , 9 0 0
S o u r c e o f F u n d s
k . e :
M e a s u r e
A W e s t e r n C o u n t y S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s i t
r r " : f i t , , " :
: . " } a . } ��" ' " , ; : ^ , } } ' . } : . + s ' ��' " : / : ' " : , . " . . .
, . . " } . : , a ' " ' : ' : " :
/
. . . . ' . i C . . : : : . .
: ; " ^ . . \ . r . . ��.
. n '
: r . S " : "
: r
:
" . . . . . .
. : . . " . " . " } i :
}
i k
r
: ' r . . " ' y
' : ��' ��
I n c l u d e d i n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t
y
: : r
J , " r , + ��' . " ��}
l
. . .
Y e a r
I n c l u d e d i n P r o g r a m B u d g e t
y
Y e a r P r o g r a m m e d
A p p r o v e d A l l o c a t i o n
Y e a r o f A l l o c a t i o n
B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t R e q u i r e d
n
F i n a n c i a l I m p a c t N o t A p p l i c a b l e
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve allocation of $50,900 in Measure A Specialized Transit
Funds available in the Western Riverside County to Meditrans Services to be used as
the required 20% federal match for the purchase of four replacement vehicles, one
expansion vehicle and five mobile radio units.
•
•
•
0'00017
AGENDA ITEM 7A
"
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 1, 1998
TO:
Budget and Finance Committee
FROM:
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Karl Sauer, Bechtel Resident Engineer
THROUGH:
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Award Construction Contract for Sound Walls on State Route 91
In April and May of 1996, both the City of Riverside and RCTC agreed on the
selection of the Phase 1 Sound Walls between Magnolia to Mary streets. At the
September 1996 Commission meeting, the Commission approved Amendment 4 to
agreement RO 9101 with URS Greiner to prepare the plans, specifications and
construction estimate (PS&E) for the Phase 1 Sound Walls. The following Table lists
the locations of each of the Sound Walls included in Phase I.
Wall #
General Location
For Specific Location see exhibit contained in
Dec. 1995 Greiner report.
Proposed
Construction
Height
35(1)
N Side -- Tyler to Van Buren
12'
77
N Side -- Van Buren to Jackson
10'
78
S Side -- Van Buren to Jackson
10'
149
N Side -- Adams mid way to Jefferson
10'-12'
221
N Side -- Madison to Mary
14'
183(2)
(Phase II)
N Side -- Madison to Jefferson (Commission
authorized advanced funding at 1/14/98 meeting)
10'
1. At the May 21, 1997 (special meeting) of RCTC, the Commission and Caltrans
agreed to advance the delivery of Sound Wall #35, between Van Buren and
Tyler streets, which was included in the Phase 1 list. The construction contract
has been issued for Sound Wall #35 and will complete construction in mid April
of 1998.
2. Wall 183 was recommended to be constructed with Phase I since funding was
available.
•
OOCU18
The remaining walls required the acquisition of approximately sixty (60) temporary
construction easements and construction could not begin until all of the temporary
construction easements have been obtained. Acquisition of the 60 temporary
construction easements have progressed ahead of schedule. The 13 remaining
temporary construction easements have been recommended to be obtained through
the eminent domain process. The eminent domain acquisition process for the 13
remaining temporary construction easements is discussed as a separate item on this
agenda.
At the January 14, 1998 meeting of RCTC, the Commission authorized staff to
advertise for receipt of construction bids for the Phase I Sound Wall Project. The
current due date for all bids to be received by RCTC is March 31, 1998. Pending the
finalization of all temporary construction easements required for the project, the bids
will be opened on March 31, 1998, reviewed, and evaluated prior to the April 8,
1998 Commission meeting. Staff will make its recommendation of the lowest
responsive bidder to the Commission, for its approval, at the April 8, 1998
Commission meeting. This project will takeapproximately 8 months to construct after
notice to proceed.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$4,600,000 (53,000,000 + 5850,000 + 5750,000)
Construction and landscaping costs for Phase 1 walls + Wall
183 from Phase II
Source of Funds
Measure
"A"
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
Y
• Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
N
Financial Impact Not Applicable
BUDGET/FINANCE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission award a construction contract for the project to the lowest
responsive bidder. Staff's recommendation of the lowest responsive bidder will be
presented to the Commission at the April 8, 1998 meeting.
000019
"
A G E N D A I T E M 7 B
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E :
A p r i l 1 , 1 9 9 8
T O :
B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M :
B i l l H u g h e s , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r
T H R O U G H :
P a u l B l a c k w e l d e r , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T :
A p p r o v a l t o A d v e r t i s e a R e q u e s t f o r P r o p o s a l ( R F P ) t o P r o v i d e
S u p p o r t f o r C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t S e r v i c e s R e l a t e d t o L a n d s c a p i n g
P r o j e c t s o n S t a t e R o u t e 9 1 a n d Y u m a D r i v e I n t e r c h a n g e .
S e v e r a l m a j o r l a n d s c a p i n g p r o j e c t s w i l l s o o n b e u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n t h a t w i l l r e q u i r e
c o n s t r u c t i o n m a n a g e m e n t s e r v i c e s b y R C T C . T h e s e p r o j e c t s i n c l u d e t h e S t a t e R o u t e
9 1 N o i s e W a l l s a n d t h e Y u m a D r i v e I n t e r c h a n g e . T h e m a j o r i t y o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n
m a n a g e m e n t o v e r s i g h t w i l l b e p r o v i d e d b y B e c h t e l . H o w e v e r , b a s e d o n r e c e n t
C a l t r a n s r e q u i r e m e n t s , t h e S t a t e w i l l r e q u i r e t h a t t h e l a n d s c a p i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n
c o n t r a c t s h a v e a l a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t a v a i l a b l e t o o v e r s e e c r i t i c a l c o m p o n e n t s o f t h e
l a n d s c a p i n g i n s t a l l a t i o n . S t a f f i s t h e r e f o r e r e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t R C T C s e l e c t a f i r m t h a t
c a n p r o v i d e t h e o n - c a l l l a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t t o f u l l f i l l t h e s e r e q u i r e m e n t s i n a s i m i l a r
f a s h i o n a s R C T C s e l e c t e d f i r m s t o p r o v i d e m a t e r i a l t e s t i n g a n d s u r v e y i n g s e r v i c e s t o
s u p p o r t t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i t i e s .
A r e q u e s t f o r p r o p o s a l s ( R F P ) w i l l b e p r e p a r e d a n d d i s t r i b u t e d t o a l l i n t e r e s t e d f i r m s .
A s e l e c t i o n p a n e l w i l l b e f o r m e d t o r e v i e w t h e p r o p o s a l s r e c e i v e d . T h e p a n e l w i l l b e
c o m p o s e d o f m e m b e r s f r o m C a l t r a n s , t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e , R C T C a n d B e c h t e l . A f t e r
t h e t o p r a n k e d f i r m h a s b e e n i d e n t i f i e d b a s e d o n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s , R C T C S t a f f w i l l
n e g o t i a t e t h e s c o p e o f w o r k t o b e p e r f o r m e d w i t h t h e s e l e c t e d f i r m . T h e r e s u l t s o f
t h e s e l e c t i o n p a n e l a n d t h e s c o p i n g n e g o t i a t i o n s w i l l b e b r o u g h t b a c k f o r C o m m i s s i o n
f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l .
0 0 0 0 2 0
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
To be determined from RFP and selection panel scoping
negotiations
Source of Funds
•
Measure A - funded from the $15.98 million currently
designated for the Phase II Noise wall project on SR 91
between Magnolia to Mary Streets and funds allocated for the
Yuma Drive interchange
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Y
Year Programmed
2000
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
n
Financial Impact Not Applicable
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission direct Staff to advertise and select a qualified firm to provide
Landscaping On -Call services to support the construction management activities
related to the construction of landscaping for the State Route 91 Noise Walls and the
Yuma Drive Interchange. Following the selection process, Staff will negotiate a cost
for the scope of services with the selected firm to deliver the required PS&E package.
The results of the selection process, scope of services and cost to perform the work
will be brought back to the Commission for review and approval.
•
•
000021
AGENDA ITEM 7C
•
"
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 1, 1998
TO:
Budget and Finance Committee
4 FROM:
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
THROUGH:
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Completion of the State Route 79 Realignment Study through the
Cities of Hemet and San Jacinto.
At the January 8, 1997 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved an expenditure of
$75,000 to perform a route realignment study for the Cities of Hemet and San
Jacinto. CH2MHiIl was selected to perform the study. The study is now complete
and a final report is available. The table of contents of the report, as well as, a map
depicting the study area are attached .for your information. The 250 + page report
with fold out maps is available to the public for $30 plus an additional $5 for shipping
if required.
Three public meetings were advertised and held during the project study. Two at the
beginning were held at the City of Hemet and at the Winchester Home Owners
Association. The final presentation was held at the San Jacinto City Council meeting.
The project team included representatives from Caltrans, the City of Hemet, the City
of San Jacinto, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, County of
Riverside, and RCTC.
The proposed cross section is shown as Figure 3 (attached) and is 134 feet which will
provide for an initial 4 lanes (two in each direction) with a 5 foot inside shoulder and
10 foot outside shoulder. The study recommends that an additional 25 foot future
set back be provided through the development process.
Various alternatives were evaluated throughout the study area shown in the attached
map. After eliminating the alternatives that were not deemed to be feasible, the
study focused on three primary alternatives in the south portion of the study area
through the City of Hemet and three alternatives in the north portion of the study area
through the City of San Jacinto. The estimated costs for the proposed realignments
are summarized below:
000022
Summary of Costs for SR 79 realignment
($ Millions)
Location
Lowest Cost
(at grade separation used
where possible)
Ultimate
(includes all proposed
grade separations)
Hemet Area
$41 - $57
$70 - $85
San Jacinto Area
$19 - $27
$37 -$53
The next stage of project development would be to perform a Project Study Report
or a combined Project Study Report and Project Report. If the Project Report is
undertaken, the environmental clearance could be obtained at the same time. A
portion of this process could be combined with the Community & Environmental
Transportation Approval Process (CETAP) process discussed separately in this
agenda, or it could move forward as a stand -a -lone process.
Funding for the next phase of studies could come from various sources including a
Federal demonstration project included in the next authorization of ISTEA or the 2%
planning money included with SB 45.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Receive and file State Route 79 Realignment Study.
2. Direct Staff to study funding alternatives for the Project Study Report, Project
Report, and environmental clearance studies.
•
•
•
00Co:3
"
F i n a l
S t a t e R o u t e 7 9
R e a l i g n m e n t S t u d y
R e p o r t
"
P r e p a r e d f o r
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y
I n C o o p e r a t i o n w i t h
C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t 8
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o
C i t y o f H e m e t
J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 8
C H 2 M H I L L
3 H u t t o n C e n t r e , S u i t e 2 0 0
S a n t a A n a , C A 9 2 7 0 7
S C O / 9 7 3 5 8 0 0 0 1 . D O C / t
0 0 0 0 2 4
Contents
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Background
3.0 Need and Purpose
Figure 1- Location Map
Figure 2 - Vicinity Map 5
3.1 Analysis of Traffic Conditions — Existing 6
Table 1 Existing Conditions, Daily Level of Service Summary 7
3.2 Analysis of Traffic Condition — Future 7
Table 2 Year 2001 Conditions Daily Level of Service Summary 8
Table 3 Operating Levels and Deficiencies (no build) 8
Table 4 Improvements Necessary to Attain the Route Concept 8
3.3 Accident Analysis
1
2
3
4
9
Table 5 Actual and Expected Accident Rates 9
4.0 Alternatives
9
Alternative A-0: No Build . 10
Alternative "A" (South Segment) 10
Alternative "B" (South Segment) 11
Alternative "C" (South Segment) 11
Alternative "D" (South Segment) 12
Alternative "E" (North Segment) 12
Alternative "F" (North Segment) 13
Alternative "G" (North Segment) 14
Alternative "H" (North Segment) 14
SCO/973580001.DOC/1
O1J 0 2. 5
"
"
C o n t e n t s , C o n t i n u e d
C o s t S u m m a r y o f A l t e r n a t i v e s 1 5
F i g u r e 3 - T y p i c a l C r o s s S e c t i o n . . . . 1 6
T a b l e 6 C o s t S u m m a r y o f P r o p o s e d A l t e r n a t i v e s U l t i m a t e B u i l d O u t C o n d i t i o n 1 7 "
T a b l e 7 C o s t S u m m a r y o f P r o p o s e d A l t e r n a t i v e s ( I n t e r i m C o n d i t i o n ) 1 8
T a b l e 8 C o s t S u m m a r y o f P r o p o s e d I n t e r c h a n g e s / B r i d g e s O n l y 1 9
5 . 0 E n v i r o n m e n t a l C o n s t r a i n t s . . . 2 0
B i o l o g i c a l R e s o u r c e s 2 0
F l o o d p l a i n I n v o l v e m e n t 2 3
H a z a r d o u s W a s t e
2 4
S o c i o e c o n o m i c I m p a c t s 2 4
6 . 0 F u n d i n g 2 5
7 . 0 S c h e d u l e
2 5
E x h i b i t s : A l t e r n a t i v e s " A " t o " H "
A p p e n d i x I : P u b l i c M e e t i n g M i n u t e s
A p p e n d i x I I : D e t a i l e d Q u a n t i t i e s a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t
A p p e n d i x I I I : C o m m e n t s R e c e i v e d f r o m R e v i e w i n g A g e n c i e s
C a l t r a n s
C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e
C i t y o f H e m e t
C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o
W i n c h e s t e r H o m e o w n e r s A s s o c i a t i o n
S R 7 9 R P T . d o c
0 0 0 0 2 6
Contents, Continued
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Osborne Development Corporation
Lewis Lohr
Westra Family Trust
•
•
•
SR79_RPT.doc
ui
000027
0
-
O
0
ALESSANDRO BLVD.
1-
to
Y
0
La
La
PERRIS
NUEVO RD. a'
NEWPORT R0.
ap1�RO�
CYN. Q�
To Interstate 15
RAMONA EXPRESSWAY
z
W
CORRIDOR
STUDY LIMITS
WINCHESTER /
GRAND AVE.
HOLLAND
1
c2
/
/
To Interstate 15
/
To lnterstote 10
It
1
/ SAN
JACINTO
ESPLANADE
S.R. 74-79
HEMET
I
AVE
0
z
I
z
STETSON... AVE. I
PROJECT AREA LOCATION
STATE ROUTE 79 RE-ALIGHNUENT PROJECT
FIGURE 1
4
000028
CORRIDOR STUDY LIMITS
WINCHES
COMMUN
•
VICINITY MAP
STATE ROUTE 79 RE -ALIGNMENT STU
FIGURE 2
5UULI
"
R / W
F U T U R E
R / W
I f '
i r
2 5 ' ' 1 5 ' . 5 ' 1 1 0 '
r F U T U R E H P S H L D
S E T B A C K
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
6 7 '
1 3 4 '
. 0 1
T
6 7 '
2 L A N E S J . 5 1 8 ' . L 8 ' J ' . L 2 4 '
2 4 '
S H L D S H L D 2 L A N E S
1 2 ' T 1 2 ' I
T 1 2 '
I
I
I
1 2 '
T Y P I C A L C R O S S S E C T I O N
S R 7 9
N T S
F I G U R E 3
1 0 '
S H L D
5 '
H P
R / W
F U T U R E
R / W
I l I
1 ��
1 5 ' ' 2 5 '
F U T U R E ,
' S E T B A C I Q
I
at170
O
8
L. .
cLEGEND i
I
PROPOSED CENTERLINE SR 79 I
CJ --- - PROPOSED R/W F .-_ - ._ _
C-1' — - — PROPOSED CENTERLINE FUTURE ROAD
r PROPOSED BRIOGE
11
NOTE.
FOR COMPLETE RICHT OF RAT AND
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RICHT
or WAY RECORD MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE .
WINCHESTER , IROAO
1 !I III It .1 . r-..
II
I
I' I \ •. I . : ,4 -- - ---l- ILL.- .-,!--1 I 7:7. I . =.1 .---_ .-:- ..-_-_- t___L]
1
r
i I la .--.___ am I ��
1- IW ��� II II I iet—n—=- -__� I�` �—1 1; I.
, I I i I I - -- — I I
V. �li I II' , i ilii1 1' I
Iill-- III 11 11 —H11— __ r -T- - -+
�I
'li ..fill` I i f:
—!!1114 I 1�j �_II_ •_I I , ,
I I il
f y I —- P�ITTERS_
-II "I I t
I` `— I L II? 1 •.j 1
It
� �— I �j t > ;III
9 - 1 t--� --1
11
1.
DIRT COU NT,
OS
111%,
NOM
79
TOT
1L
1tiV1
X. X/X. X
ia.STtRto CIVIL MIMIC.
K �NA 4MaOYK Oat(
CHI N HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE DR..•200
SANTA ANA. CA 12707
I ,•. t4 I I I
1•
i 1 I
I
I, : j1
li ;
li 1it --
I II''1
:''II '
fi : .• --
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET L� .
L__ 1
1' ----21,
�.�
— AVENUE'--- ' r— I -1-17PI
-- ^r— -
1 II I li_ II— i�
1 I II
il--iI
a — .--.
I 1
11 ---_. .- -1-
A RNATIYE A
UT l . I• .S'o•
1-10
"
I
I
a t
y a
N
N O T E .
F O R C O M P L E T E R I G H T o r W A Y A N D
A C C U R A T E A C C E S S D A T A . S E E R I G H T
o f W A Y R E C O R D M A P S A T D I S T R I C T O F F I C E .
C D
c i
M A T C H L I N E S E E . S H E E T L - I A
I i :
i
I I < I I ��
v
I I I "
I I I i
i j l I
.
[ - - \ I
L > '
1
r
A O U E D U C T ` ` �� ��
1
- ' -
I I "
I I
C A L I F L N I A
1
I i
1 A M E
I \
\ : ` " , i e 1 "
I L I i r . _ _ % . n o m I \
i l l I 1 , 1 9 . \
- - I ( , 1 1
I 1 ��` . p
S A N D I E G O C A N A L I r \ C - - _
3 1 : 1 ` 1 t . . - . y - ` . . - ' . .
1
_ _ , _ _ _ _ J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
X . x / x . X
h w A A M I I O V L I A T I
C N N H I L L
3 B U T T O N C E N T R E D R . . . 2 0 0
S A N T A A N A . C A ! 2 7 0 7
A L T E R N A T I V E A
I t " X T a o
L - 2 A
ao
X
b
MOTE.
FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY AND
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RIGHT
OF WAY RECORD LAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE.
rD
•
WARREN - --
7-13
ROAD
•
I
WII. tr ;1
din . ��
fco
• I
_=-4 I
. .... .--- ,..,..,.,-- ---,r --- WARREt1- ROAD
I
110
o• 0,• e
I -I
•
CNN HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE DR.. e200
SANTA ANA. CA •2707
if
r„•
•
ALTERNATIVE A
110UT
o.
L -3A
"
"
"
N
1 . 1
a
O
u
1 . 2 0
N O T E .
F O R C O M P L E T E R I G H T O F R A T A N D
A C C U R A T E A C C E S S D A T A , S E E R I G H T
o r W A Y R E C O R D M A P S A T D I S T R I C T O F F I C E .
Q
C )
c )
1
4 , -
% . 1
M I I N C N E T E R i o 1 I R E I A D J , L , E , T I J
i 7 - - = - r I 1 T 1
I = I I I I I I I
I I I I 1 1 I
i P i t
! I , i -
i t
I I I - I 1 1
I ' E r r ! :
! -
H � T 1 i , ' E i _ ,
1
1 _
j l
` I A l l - R S 1 1 A V E N U E 1 1 _ 1 I - ' I L
1 I I I i ` . �� f - I - �� I I I
I 1
W
I t : I l i 1 i ! , , , ,
' . . - ; i ` - \ I 1
a I I i I y
�� I O M 1 ' �� i c e . I I 1 1 ;
1 I 7 , c e , 1 I f
I I - ' 4 - - - - - - - - , - -
9 4 i
` ` , I 1 I 1 1 ����
r , i I
i
1
I
I f
I t s "
"
i t
I ' 1 :
M A T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T L - 2 1 1 .
I
i t
( - - - 1
y '
W E T �%Y A I T
x . x i x . x I ��x J I X { K
A L T E R N A T I V E 8
L A Y O U T
T
L - 1 e
1
a
NOTE.
FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY AND
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RICHT
OF RAY RECORD MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE .
C3
W
L�
M ATCH LINE SEE SHE
>I
t l
1
O.
•
1 L-1•
•
Z7• II
�I 1E1 1
'— --- IY
15
—
! CALIF,—NIA1
l..
I
I I
!'g
Ho -
VI
-t-i
— AY�ENUE S
Fi i I j
SAN DIEGO CANAL I 1:
—. _-- - -- - ,. .1 - r-- - �--
SR179'-..-1 `_
•
1OUEDUCT 65
•
%�
— 1— .I.T 1�Tihrr— —
WARREN 1 ROAD
r
•
DIST 601AITT
01 I R P/
IRONIC
Tf
x .x/x .x
IIICI$ICRED CI V IL [IIOINtge
rt emsarowovaL Daft
CHMM HILL
S !MUTTON CENTRE OR .••200
SANTA ANA. CA 12707
•• •
!l -- -.
_ .
AL NATIVE 8
I •500'
L-28
"
"
N O T E .
i 0 4 1 C O M P L E T E R I G H T O F W A Y A N D
A C C U R A T E
O F t Y R E C O R D S �%I A P S T A T D E S T R I C T E T O i f 1 0 E .
I e
0
! y y
I C
l i
W
a
a t
e a
3 i
W A R R E N
a
r 3
l
' I N
u
- - i 1 1
1 1
I ' I t
I I
_ _ L i J J J L
- " W A R R E N - R O A D D
I j
I l e s ? c o r m I n o u n T v I a l t C I s 1
O R I R h v 7 5 I X X / X . X X I I
A C A I S T [ I I [ o C I v u . [ N p , M [ ( 1 1
P L A N S u " w v u a r t
0 1 2 1 1 H I L L
3 M U T T O N C E N T R E D R . " " 2 0 0
S A N T A A N A . C A 5 2 7 0 7
I a
M I L
r
" U r - I f r u f - l o r ' , ,
A L T E R N A T I V E B
L A Y O U T
S C A L D I " " S 0 0 '
i
o:
1
Is
ge l
NOTE.
FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY AND
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RICHT
OF WAY RECORD MAPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE .
C
W
•
s
I j
II<
� . - •' L
1 I
WINCHESTER III IROAD !-�
r
i .
I r C} —I }" F=7 -
Ill iv._ + • .L—i �� rl r
I
1
J
_._ l W
l § j
c40., - -4,4/ -
r1 ` 4.. I o; j•1-
u` �4— 1-
I
•
N'
1;
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 1.2C
,j
11
CH2N HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE DR..•200
SANTA ANA. CA 12707
ALTERNATIVE C
OrMsto.
L -1C
If.w•.r . ..••••«K
O
O y
x x
NOTE•
FOR COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY AND
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RIGHT
or WAY RECORD MAPS AT OISrR,Cr OFFICE .
O
CD
00
;1
1
I
N
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET L -IC
'.! 1
---- - i- -1-- I
- - I " ---
19 ---
---
1
I
II
`� 11
i!
AQUEDUCT R �\ — — ' 1 •
f-1 ,, �J
�— I ..—.. i
a 1
C is 1
SAN DIEGO 1 CANAL
SR 1f —
1
WARREN I ROAD
to
111-
— Id
I
i
—
\
r—
CHEM HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE DR...2o0
SANTA A NA. CA 52707
i1I I I I - .-I I l I
A
.41
ALTERNATIVE C
A
L
SCALEYOUT. I•.500'
L -2C
K
K
NOTE.
FOR ACCURATE
ACCESS DATRIGHT A. SEE F SAT RIGHT
OF RAY RECORD.WPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE.
•
WARREN I —
ROAD • J I I_,_`—.
---- ____ ---
it
>;�y s
— tic 14,9
1.- it
/As
•
-
WARREN- ; ROAD
me me•—e-110.-
L
HST COIMT.
OS I RIv
tor#i MOL�[ct
X. X/X . X
CH2Y HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE OR. ,•200
SANTA ANA. CA 12707
*brieSws� :.
r
X Xr
ALTERNATIVE C
4110M,L.
• •
184felmsalt ••
L -3C
1
1
0
m
xx
.-0
JN
u0W
0
WY
0
sN
144
1
WARREN
SAN DIEGO CANAL
t
•
I
I II �1
i! 1
11
W 1!
>!b
i
I,1
f;I
NOTE.
FOR COM PLETE RICNT OF RAY AND
ACCLIMATE ECCCRDSIUPSTAT SEE
STRICTTOFFICE.
•
SANDERSON
•
I�
II
f
/•
,/
SAN DIEGO CANAL _r-
li;
uj
•
• J.
•
I;F
> i �O
AVENU E
•
TOAD
lr
S.
NI
CH2m HILL
3 MUTTON CENTRE DR..•200
SANTA ANA. CA 92707
1
---•_FUTURE— I ROAD - _ - -
•
ALTERNATIVE E
LAYOUT
SCALE. I' •500 - 1 _A9`
1
s
a
00
v.
a
0
M
M
RS
%
_ 1 i
- - - _1-- IVAR__
Ni
- � SAN DIEGO CANAL
at
0.
W
1i
C. ) - = _ __ _
40E.
FOR CONNA TE RIOT OF RAT AND
ACCURATE DATA. SEE RIONT
of RAT RiuPS AT DISTRICT OFFICE.
SANDERSON
II
II
II
II
II
SAN DIEGO CANAL
•
;
II
i
W
u1.1
CSI
,
vi
_�
A
AVENUE
1
CH2 M HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE 08 .••200
SANTA ANA, CA 92707
•
4J
WRNATIVE F
AYOUT
LF, 1• •A00•
L -4F
"
"
N O T E .
P O P C O M P L E T E R I C H T Q C M A Y A N D
A C C O f W A Y T R E C O R D S M A P S T A T S E E
S T R I C T T o r r i c e .
4 . ,
- F U T U R E _ :
o f
g i
I
_ R O A D i ' ' i
i g i
, ! ! I
W Y I
L O H
��' ��- - - - - - - " - " - - . N ; 1 1 _ - _ - 1 , ��- �� -
P .
J . Q
W 1
i = C 1
- - O L - - - - I _ I ' +
D I S T O / I C ( v " I R O U T S I T O M ' 4 0 . 4 1 1 7
P L A N S M I M O S A / O S V C
C N N R I L L
3 M U T T O N C E N T R E O R . . " 2 0 0
S A N T A A N A . C A 1 2 7 0 7
A L T E R N A T I V E E
A Y 0 0 . .
L - Q E
VI
WW
W
a
gl
NotEI
con CCOMTE RICHT or RAY AND
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RICHT
Or RAY RECORD MAPS AT DISTRICT OSFICE.
ft. -TIME- ROAD,
I
i '9.1
Igf
,e
I
/gi8
.1_. 1;li
g1
•
I..Lw•Nr .♦ N• ••M... •
DIET MITI Mai 1 IT Y
a 1 Rlv 7R X.X/X .II
IIuSISTEQDCIvq iNDI Ntpm
PLANS Ai'PN OTM. art
CH2Y HILL
3 HUTTON CENTRE DR. .•200
SANTA ANA, CA !2707
.1111,
ALTERNATIVE F
f9UT
E. I ••S00•
L -5F
"
! 1
I j
1
"
1 1
r r - -
w .
1 -
I
W A R R E N
_ , _ - - -
S A N O I E C O C A N A L "
I
; �� ��" , \ : �� S A N D I E G O C A N A L I I -
i 1 , ` 1 1
i s
r ' ; ! - _ 1
' ��
I ; 1
1 1 1
r . l ! ! i t
1 f .
1 1
( ,
I I I I I
1 ; 1 I
V I I I i l
i 1
I
. , , , , I i + I
1
: O R C C O W L E T E R I C H T O F W A Y H A N D
A C C U R A T E A C C E S S D A T A . S E E R I O N T
o f W A Y R E C O R D M A P S A T D I S T R I C T O F F I C E .
S A N D E R S O N
D 1 i i M e n , 1 X O U T A L L ' I L a T ' ������ o ` . ��T . t
O S S l y 7 S l T O X . X / X . X 1 X X
0 1 2 4 H I L L
3 N O T I O N C E N T R E O R . . " 2 0 0
S A N T A A N A . C A 2 2 7 0 7
:
A L T E R N A T I V E O
L A Y O U T
S C A L E . 1 . " 9 0 0 "
1 - w A
--I FUTURE ROAD
SANDE SON '
— • — — �- AVENUE
C)
MATE
ACCESS DATICHT A. SEE WAY RIGHT
OF CAT RECORD N APS AT DISTRICT 0«ICE.
1
'zir CT 's rn;t• —
gif
yw /
!,I
1I
- ---- -I -
..•rw.ur
sIst tourtr I newt I T OL � oiEtt P4 vI,
OS ( RI., I Tt ' X. X/X. X 1 X°
RtOItrtREDe, Y4 MOWER
PL ANS M►ne•u art
CNN MILL
3 MUTTON CENTRE DR ..•200
SANTA ANA. CA 12T0T
AL NATIVE 0
TOUT
E. I••S00 •
L -so
TOR COArL(SE RICNT or OAT AND
ACCLRATE ACCESS DATA. SEE R16NT
or W AY RECORD MARX Al OIS►RICT OTTICE.
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET L-1!
iIi!
I
5
( Y
W
lu
.s /
LA Yit
ore.
O UT d if • •/
R
1
7Tv.
Lr.ws
•
. O NC
0 4, art IQLi C b✓la ,
CD
Ca
rPL
.u. „,
.CALIF RN1AI
SAN ,p�F,G0
CANAL '—•
.
WARREN
-r -r
1
ROAD
TLoe.it. rly frY
OI1w.'E wee i. +'4.
1
VI
A. C OIL.. •am*
OS
INCISITRE0 I OActertui
n.s A.►eeO v.L a
.012N NILE
3 MUTTON CENTRE{ DR ..•2O0
SANTA ANA. CA 112107
ri
ALTERNATIVE 9
iE (VXTDD
N OTE,
FOR COu PLETE RICHT or DAY AIq
ACCURATE ACCESS DATA. SEE RICNT
OT RAT RECORD MAPS AT DISTRICT OFTICE.
I
I i
— F�= ROAD
cJ
&I I
�
Id m�l
k m
W
I W I
i•
•
• /0712aNR .v6i,
4. ..
s/1Na
i
Ica %
J
la
=.
CNN MILL
3 MUTTON CENTRE' 00..•200
SANTA ANA. CA 12707
n=2109)
ir
1
cQwr amotist- Bgioar
L. L..L Assdc.
j• •J 21i 17 L. Gr«,,. .,(L P✓
(4
r I w1.4%. Ci
' q1591:: ALT
TIVE E
L ;ter . ,.::: tiAYOUT, .
AGENDA ITEM 8A
"
"
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 1, 1998
TO:
Budget & Finance Committee
FROM:
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Karl Sauer, Bechtel Resident Engineer
THROUGH:
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Award Amendment No. 2 to F.R. Harris Agreement RO-9731.
At the October 9, 1996 meeting, the Commission awarded a contract to F.R. Harris
for an amount of $258,732 to perform Phase I design work to construct a new
platform, station track, and pedestrian over crossing across the tracks from the
existing Riverside Metrolink Downtown Station adjacent to the BN&SF south main
line.
At the March 12, 1997 meeting, the Commission awarded Amendment No. 1 to. F.R.
Harris for an amount of $426,268 to prepare the final bid documents (plans,
specifications and estimates) to construct a new platform, station track, and
pedestrian over crossing across the tracks from the existing Riverside Metrolink
Downtown Station adjacent to the BN&SF south main line. The existing extra work
of $86,268 (unused) was maintained. No new extra work was added to the contract
by Amendment No.1.
The final bid documents have been completed, the project was advertised for
construction bids, the Commission awarded a construction contract to the lowest
responsive bidder, Kiewit Pacific Co., and a Notice to proceed was given with the first
day of construction commencing on January 12, 1998. The project is scheduled to
be complete with construction by the middle of October, 1998. The following Extra
Work Requests were submitted by F.R. Harris, and authorized, during this time period:
000048
F.R. HARRIS EXTRA WORK REQUEST SUMMARY (RO-9731)
No.
DATE
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
1
06/09/97
Surveillance System Design
$23,867
2
08/26/97
Inspection of Sante Fe Depot
$4,800
3
08/29/97
Design of Restroom for Guards
$4,080
4
09/11/97
Provide Copies of Bid Drawings and
Spec's
$3,425
5
10/14/97
Provide Bid Evaluation and Const
Support
$30,000
6
10/20/97
Provide Support for City Joint Use
Agreement
$3,805
TOTAL
•
$69,977
The design of this project was very time consuming because of the large amount of
interagency coordination and approval requirements. The project design had to be
reviewed and approved by BN&SF, SCRRA, and the City of Riverside Public Works,
Electrical, and Water Departments. F.R. Harris had to spend an enormous amount of
time and resources to gain approval of the final project plans from all agencies
involved. On February 27, 1998, F.R. Harris informed staff, by letter, that it had
overran its authorized budget by $31,246.24 in the process of completing the final
plan approval. Staff was aware that the effort to gain approval of the project plans
was taking more effort than was previously assumed, but F.R. Harris did not notify
staff of the amount of the additional cost overrun until F.R. Harris requested
compensation after the extra work was completed.
F.R. Harris is requesting compensation in the amount of $25,640.00 for the additional
plan check services, provided for the project, and submitted to RCTC for payment.
F.R. Harris is willing to absorb the additional $5,606.24, of the $31,246.24, that has
not been submitted to RCTC for payment and F.R. Harris will also forgo its 10% fee
on any additional work RCTC requests for the project. Staff has reviewed the scope
of work involved with the overrun, and the respective costs involved, and concurs
that F.R. Harris did the work and the cost for the overrun services are in line for the
work involved.
•
•
The first months of construction have been very busy and have required a greater
construction support effort by F.R. Harris than previously anticipated. F.R. Harris is
the designer of record and as such must be involved with the review and response
of a majority of the construction submittals and requests for information that are
submitted by the contractor. The original budget for F.R. Harris to provide •
construction support services is $30,000.00. After the first three months of
construction, approximately 23% of the work effort by F.R. Harris has been
completed but approximately 60% of their budget has been spent. Staff and F.R.
Harris are in agreement with the work effort and cost to date. Staff has worked with ► 3049
F.R. Harris and is in agreement with the remaining scope of construction support
services and respective costs required of F.R. Harris to support the remaining work
required to complete construction of the project. Staff is requesting that the current
F.R. Harris construction support budget of $30,000 be increased by $50,000 for a
total construction support budget not to exceed $80,000.
Currently, construction inspection services for the project are being provided by
Bechtel, the County of Riverside, and-Ninyo & Moore. The construction of the project
also requires speciality inspection of Electrical/Mechanical/Security Systems/CCTV
installation. The F.R. Harris design team included local subconsultants that could
readily provide the special inspection services required. Staff requested that F.R.
Harris estimate the cost involved in providing the additional construction inspection
services identified above. Staff estimates that these services will not exceed
$20,000.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$7,699,000 + $1,500,000 Contingency
Source of Funds
UP Railroad & Proposition 108 &116 Funds
:::::...n; F.::r..::tiv; •: i:,v,.': •n?':ix r .:.
w
Vii.
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
Y
Year
Included in Program Budget
Partial
Year Programmed
1996
Approved Allocation
N/A
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
Y
Program Budget Adjustment Required
Financial Impact Not Applicable
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission:
(1) Authorize payment of $25,640.00 for the additional plan check services,
provided for the project, and submitted to RCTC. F.R. Harris is willing to
absorb the additional $5,606.24, of the $31,246.24 overrun, that has
not been submitted to RCTC for payment and F.R. Harris will also forgo
its 10% fee on any additional work RCTC requests for the project.
(2) Increase the current F.R. Harris construction support budget of $30,000
by $50,000 for a total construction support budget not to exceed
$80,000.
(3) Amend the F.R. Harris contract to include Electrical/Mechanical/Security
System/CCTV Construction Support Inspection Services. The cost to
provide such services will not exceed $20,000.00. 000050
(4) Approve Amendment No. 2 with F.R. Harris to provide additional
compensation of $25,640 for additional plan check work, provide
additional Construction Support Services for the new Southside Platform
for an additional amount of $50,000, and provide additional
Electrical/Mechanical/Security System/CCTV Construction Support
Inspection Services for an amount not to exceed $20,000. The new
contract value will not exceed $850,617. The amendment will utilize the
standard contract amendment format. The remaining Extra Work Budget
of $16,291 will remain in place.
000051
"
A G E N D A I T E M 9 A
"
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 1, 1998
TO:
Budget & Finance Committee
FROM:
Jerry Rivera, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Cooperative Agreement Between the State of California Department
of Transportation and Riverside County Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies for Freeway Service Patrol Program in
Riverside County
The Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program has been in operation
for almost five years and provides roving tow truck service on four beats of SR -91
and I-215/SR-60 during the morning and afternoon commute hours. The FSP
program is funded by the State of California (80%) and local SAFE fees (20%).
Funds are allocated to participating local agencies through a formula based on
population, freeway lane miles, and levels of congestion.
The attached amendment to the cooperative agreement identifies an additional
$4,500 in State funding for fiscal year 1997-98. The total State funding is
$500,100 and the Riverside County SAFE must provide matching funds of
$125,025. There are sufficient unappropriated fund balance reserves to provide
the additional $1,125 match to the $4,500 in State funds.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$1,125
Source of Funds
•••,,
`gyp
SAFE
' Y • .,
fir} : .
........ 4•,,:•...&,.':4:;:'. te.
.. . 1^
SO y.:�}�: r.•}y.:•..,
.r.: , �•
• •••• :AK:.
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
No
Year
Included in Program Budget
No
Year Programmed
Approved Allocation
No
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
Yes
Financial Impact Not Applicable
000052
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the SAFE Board approve the amendment to the cooperative agreement with
the State of California Department of Transportation, subject to Legal Counsel
review, for an additional $4,500 in State funding for the Riverside County Freeway
Service program for FY 1997-98.
•
•
t
000053
"
"
"
0 8 - R i v - V a r i o u s
I n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y
F r e e w a y S e r v i c e P a t r o l
0 8 3 0 3 - 9 3 6 2 0 8
D i s t r i c t A g r e e m e n t
N o . 8 - 1 0 3 3 , A / 1
A M E N D M E N T T O A G R E E M E N T
T h i s A M E N D M E N T t o A G R E E M E N T , e n t e r e d i n t o o n
i s b e t w e e n t h e S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A , a c t i n g b y a n d t h r o u g h i t s
D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n , r e f e r r e d t o h e r e i n a s S T A T E , a n d
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y S E R V I C E
A U T H O R I T Y F O R F R E E W A Y
E M E R G E N C I E S , a p u b l i c e n t i t y ,
r e f e r r e d t o h e r e i n a s R C S A F E .
( 1 )
R E C I T A L S
T h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o e n t e r e d i n t o a n A g r e e m e n t ( D o c u m e n t N o .
8 - 1 3 8 6 6 ) , o n J u n e 1 1 , 1 9 9 7 , s a i d A g r e e m e n t d e f i n i n g t h e
t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s o f a p r o g r a m t o p r o v i d e F r e e w a y
S e r v i c e P a t r o l ( F S P ) i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y , r e f e r r e d t o h e r e i n
a s " F S P " .
S a i d A g r e e m e n t s e t s S T A T E ' s t o t a l P R O J E C T o b l i g a t i o n
$ 4 9 5 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 , a n d i t h a s b e e n d e t e r m i n e d t h a t S T A T E ' s
P R O J E C T o b l i g a t i o n w i l l e x c e e d t h a t a m o u n t .
S a i d A g r e e m e n t s e t R C S A F E ' s c o n t r i b u t i o n a t n o l e s s
2 5 % , $ 1 2 3 , 8 7 5 . 0 0 o f t h e a m o u n t p r o v i d e d b y S T A T E .
a t
t o t a l
t h a n
I T I S T H E R E F O R E M U T U A L L Y A G R E E D :
( 1 ) S T A T E ' s t o t a l o b l i g a t i o n s p e c i f i e d i n S e c t i o n I , A r t i c l e
( 3 ) o f t h e o r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t s h a l l n o w n o t e x c e e d t h e
a m o u n t o f $ 5 0 0 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 . A r e v i s e d e s t i m a t e d F r e e w a y S e r v i c e
P a t r o l B u d g e t i s a t t a c h e d a n d m a d e a p a r t o f t h i s A m e n d m e n t
t o A g r e e m e n t , a n d s u p e r s e d e s t h e e s t i m a t e d F r e e w a y S e r v i c e
P a t r o l B u d g e t s h o w n i n t h e o r i g i n a l A g r e e m e n t .
( 2 ) R C S A F E a g r e e s t o c o n t r i b u t e n o l e s s t h a n 2 5 % , $ 1 2 5 , 0 2 5 . 0 0
o f t h e a m o u n t p r o v i d e d b y S T A T E .
( 3 ) T h e o t h e r t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s o f s a i d A g r e e m e n t ( D o c u m e n t
N o . 8 - 1 3 8 6 6 ) s h a l l r e m a i n i n f u l l f o r c e a n d e f f e c t .
0 0 0 0 5 1
(3)
District Agreement No. 8-1033, A/1
This Amendment to Agreement is hereby deemed to be a part of •
Document No. 8-13866.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS
Director of Transportation
By:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE
AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY
EMERGENCIES
By:
Chairman
S. LISIEWICZ
District Director REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED
FOR APPROVAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM By:
AND PROCEDURE: ERIC HALEY
Executive Director
Attorney, REVIEWED FOR FISCAL IMPACT:
Department of Transportation
By:
Dean Martin
CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: Chief Financial Officer
District Budget Manager
CERTIFIED AS TO PROCEDURE:
Accounting Administrator
2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Steven C. DeBaun
Best, Best and Krieger
Counsel to Riverside County
Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies
•
•
000055
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Estimated Freeway -Service Patrol Budget
FYE June 30, 1998
1
•
•
AMOUNT
SALARIES AND BENEFITS (See Attachment 1) $58,263
OFFICE LEASE $4,010
OVERHEAD (See Attachment 1) $11,312
OPERATIONS
Tow Truck Agreements $533,493
COMMUNICATIONS
L. A. Cellular Monthly Charges $2,700
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
General Legal Services $ 9,940
Audit Services 1,255
Other Professional Services $ 3.748
Total Professional Services
$14,943
RADIO AIR TIME
ICC Monthly Fee at $216 per month $2,592
SUPPLIES
Brochures and Forms $6,000
Patches, Signs, Hats, Etc. $4,000
Postage SLIM
Total Supplies
EQUIPMENT
Radio Communications Equip. -Leased
TOTAL BUDGET REQUIREMENTS $641.771
$11,000
REVENUES
State Funding - FY 97/98 $500,100
SAFE Fees - 25% Local Match $125.025
TOTAL REVENUES
$3.458
$625.125
EXCESS REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES ($16.646)
Revised: 2/6/98
000.056
Attachment I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM
FYE June 30,1998
Persona 1
Assistant Directors
Chief Financial Officer
Program Managers 11 & I
Clerk of the Commission
Program Manager I
Commission Support Staff
tbmind
Acct. 7310!1 Office Expense
Acct. 73200 Communications
Acct. `%3300 Equipment Maintenance
Acct. 73400 Insurance
Acct. 73500 Data Processing
Acct. 73600 StafffReiated Expanses
Acct. 73700 Information/Publicity
r
•
000057