Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
04 April 10, 2002 Commission
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TIME: 10:00 a.m. DATE: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 Bechtel - Records LOCATION: CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM University of California @ Riverside 1201 University Avenue, Room 207 Riverside, California 92507 X59939 Commissioners Chairman: John F. Tavaglione 1' Vice Chairman: Ron Roberts 2"d Vice Chairman: Roy Wilson Bob Buster, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside James A. Venable, County of Riverside Roy Wilson, County of Riverside Tom Mullen, County of Riverside John Hunt / Jan Wages, City of Banning Placido L. Valdivia / Roger Berg, City of Beaumont Robert Crain / Gary Grimm, City of Blythe John Chlebnik / Jon Winningham, City of Calimesa Alfred W. Trembly / Jack Wamsley, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Sarah DiGrandi, City of Cathedral City Juan M. DeLara, City of Coachella Janice L. Rudman/ Jeff Miller, City of Corona Greg Ruppert / Matt Weyuker, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin ReeserLowe / Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet Percy L. Byrd / Robert A. Bernheimer, City of Indian Wells Mike Wilson /Gene Gilbert, City of Indio John J. Pena / Ron Perkins, City of La Quinta Robert L. Schiffner / Thomas Buckley, City of Lake Elsinore Frank West / Bonnie Flickinger, City of Moreno Valley Jack F. van Haaster / Warnie Enochs, City of Murrieta Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco Dick Kelly / Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert William G. Kleindienst / Chris Mills, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris Harvey Gerber, City of Rancho Mirage Ameal Moore / Joy Defenbaugh, City of Riverside Chris Carlson-Buydos / Jim Conner, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Anne Mayer, Director, Caltrans District #8 Eric Haley, Executive Director Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Testimony Card to the Clerk of the Commission. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item fisted on the agenda 10:00 a.m. (Please Note Time Change) Wednesday, April 10, 2002 CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM University of Ca/ifomia Riverside 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside 1. CALL TO ORDER 2 ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) 6. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORTS Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Reports for the month ending February 28, 2002. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 2 6B. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Page 5 Overview This item is for the Commission to amend the Motorist Assistance budget for maintenance of equipment from $1,018,000 to $1,111,000. 6C. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-013, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO AUTHORIZE INVESTMENT OF MONIES IN THE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LA/F). " Page 6 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 02-013, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Authorize Investment of Monies in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LA/F). " 6D. TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21' CENTURY (TEA 21) STATEWIDE REAUTHORIZATION PRINCIPLES Page 9 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the TEA 21 statewide reauthorization principles as developed by the CALCOG/CALTRANS TEA 21 Reauthorization Task Force. 6E. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 12 1) Support — AB 2809 (Longville) Support SB 1 Oxxx (Sher); and, 2) Receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 3 • 6F. PROPOSITION 42 REVENUE ESTIMATES Page 16 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Proposition 42 Revenue Estimates. 6G. STIP INTRA-COUNTY FORMULA ADJUSTMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve postponing this year's adjustment to February 2003 to coincide with the development of the 2004 STIP; and, 2) Amend the STIP Intra-county Formula MOU to adjust the percentages for the allocation of STIP funds to February of every odd year to coincide with the development of future STIPs. 6H. STATUS OF THE 2002 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page 20 Overview Page 18 This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program update. 61. ALLOCATION OF STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2% PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, AND MONITORING FUNDS FOR CETAP Overview Page 27 This item is for the Commission to allocate $721,809 in 2002 STIP 2% Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) from the Western County formula pot for the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) planning effort. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 4 6J. FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 SECTION 5310 PROGRAM AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-014, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CERTIFYING PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN." Page 29 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt the FY 2002-03 FTA Section 5310 Riverside County project rankings as recommended by the Local Review Committee; 2) Include the projects in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 02-014, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Certifying Project Consistency with the Regional Transportation Plan." 6K. FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM Page 34 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the release of a Call for Projects for the FY 2002-03 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program and notify the cities, the County, and local school districts of the estimated funding available for the fiscal year. 6L. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 02-65-944 FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 COMMUTER SURVEY Page 38 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve Agreement No. 02-65- 944, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement 02-65-943, between OCTA, RCTC, and SCAG to add $15,000, with RCTC paying $7,500 and OCTA paying $7,500 to cover an additional videotaping site and associated costs. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 5 6M. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 40 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 6N. AWARD OF AGREEMENT NO. 02-25-059 TO TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY, INC. TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE FOUR METROLINK STATIONS AND ONE OFFICE BUILDING OWNED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Page 57 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Evaluation Committee's selection of Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc. to provide landscape maintenance services for the Commission owned properties; and, 2) Award Agreement No. 02-25-059 to Tropical Plaza Nursery, Inc., pursuant to Legal Counsel review. 60. CONSULTANT RANKING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROVISION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR THE PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE AT NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK STATION Page 83 Overview 1) Concur with the Selection Committee recommendations, for the ranking of Engineering Firms, as listed below, who responded to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for consultant services to provide Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Studies, for the proposed 1,000 space Parking Structure at the new North Main Corona Metrolink Station; and, Top Ranked Gordon H. Chong & Partners Second Owen Group Third DMJM + HARRIS Fourth Choate Parking Design Consultants 2) Direct staff to bring back a scope, schedule, and cost for approval after the State funding has been approved and the project scope has been finalized. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 6 6P. APPROVAL OF STATE ROUTE 74 TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT III AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-055 WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Page 86 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve entering into Agreement No. 02-31-055 with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Traffic Enforcement Services during construction of Segment 1; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission. 6Q. APPROVAL OF STATE ROUTE 74 UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-044 WITH AT&T BROADBAND Page 92 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve entering into. Agreement No. 02-31-044 with AT&T Broadband defining the responsibilities for the relocation of cable television lines related to the RCTC Measure "A" widening of SR 74 between Lake Elsinore and the City of Perris. The RCTC cost is estimated to be $6,212.26; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission. 6R. REQUEST TO AMEND CITY OF BANNING'S FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR PURCHASE OF CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FORD RANGER PICKUP Page 103. Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Amend the City of Banning's FY 2001-02 Short Range Transit Plan authorizing the purchase of a Ford Ranger pickup; and, 2) Authorize the expenditure of $8,371 in Local Transportation Funds and $6,629 in State Transit Assistance funds, previously allocated to cover the cost. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 7 • • 7. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 02-25-050 WITH AMTRAK TO SERVE THE RIVERSIDE -DOWNTOWN STATION Page 104 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve Agreement No. 02-25-050, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, with Amtrak to serve the Riverside - Downtown Station. 8. EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR MEASURE "A" EXTENSION Page 106 Overview The Expenditure Plan for the Measure "A" extension is presented for review, discussion and adoption. 9. RCTC PUBLIC INFORMATION OUTREACH PROGRAM Page 125 Overview An oral presentation will be made before the Commission on a proposal for a revised and expanded information program to apprise the public on projects completed, in progress and planned to be built in the future. 10. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 11. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Overview Page 126 This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. Included in the agenda packet is a report by Commissioner Frank Hall on the APTA Legislative Conference. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda April 10, 2002 Page 8 12. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54946.8 A. Negotiating Parties: RCTC — Executive Director or Designee Property Owners: See Following List of Property Owners SR -74 Right -Of -Way Acquisitions Item CPN APN Grantor 1 13896-1 342-240-024 Ethel May Hatcher 2 13897-1 326-240-031 lanthe M. Roberson Bentley - Johnson 3 13903-1 326-240-052 Michael B. & Bonnie S. Martin B. Negotiating Parties: RCTC — Executive Director or Designee Property Owner: White Rock Development Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment Item APN Grantor 1 377-373-008 White Rock Development 2 377-373-008 White Rock Development 3 377-373-008 White Rock Development 4 347-120-016 White Rock Development 5 347-120-016 White Rock Development 6 347-120-016 White Rock Development 7 347-120-016 White Rock Development 8 347-120-016 White Rock Development 9 347-120-017 White Rock Development White Rock Development 10 347-120-017 11 347-120-020 White Rock Development 12 347-120-020 White Rock Development 13 347-120-020 White Rock Development 14 347-120-020 White Rock Development 15 347-120-021 White Rock Development 16 347-120-021 White Rock Development 17 347-120-021 White Rock Development 18 347-120-021 White Rock Development 13. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 8, 2002, Chancellor's Conference Room, University of • California @ Riverside, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside. AGENDA ITEM 4 • • Minutes RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, March 13, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chairman John Tavaglione at 9:00 a.m., in the Chancellor's Conference Room at the University of California at Riverside, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Daryl Busch Bob Buster Chris Buydos John Chlebnik Joy Defenbaugh Juan DeLara John Hunt William G. Kleindienst Dick Kelly Anne Mayer Tom Mullen John J. Pena Gregory S. Pettis Robin Lowe Ron Roberts Janice Rudman Robert Schiffner Harvey Sullivan John F. Tavaglione Alfred W. Trembly Placido L. Valdivia Jack van Haaster James A. Venable Frank West Mike Wilson Roy Wilson Percy Byrd Robert Crain Harvey Gerber Greg Ruppert Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no requests from the public to speak. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — February 13, 2002 M/S/C (Buster/M. Wilson) to approve the February 13, 2002 minutes as presented. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-012, "RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ACQU/RE FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, THAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE REALIGNMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 74, BETWEEN DEXTER AVENUE IN LAKE ELS/NORE TO 7TH STREET IN PERR/S (SEGMENTS 1 AND 2) At this time Chairman Tavaglione opened the public hearing. Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, explained the nature and scope of public hearing including the findings that the Commission is being asked to make prior to the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity. He stated that the cost for the properties is not the subject matter for this hearing. Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board, stated that notices were mailed to the affected property owners and proofs of mailing of the notices of the hearing are on file. Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director, reviewed the State Route 74 project and each of the findings. The County of Riverside Real Property Department is acting as the right-of-way acquisition agent for the Commission in the acquisition of parcels. This presentation constitutes appropriate and adequate information for the Commission to affirm the required findings and approve the Resolution of Necessity subject to any comments from the public. Naty Kopenhaver stated that no written objections or letters were received from the affected property owners. One request to be heard was received from Lindy Lee Long, an affected property owner. Lindy Lee Long expressed her concern that community interests are not being met. She believes that SR 74 is being improved to benefit development interests. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 3 Chairman Tavaglione stated that the SR 74 realignment and improvement project has been discussed extensively by the Commission and the focus has always been on traffic safety and deaths, not development interests. There being no further requests to speak on this matter, Chairman Tavaglione declared the public hearing closed. M/S/C (MullenNenable) to: 1) Approve the following findings: a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. b) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. c) The fee and easement interests to be acquired are necessary for the project. d) The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners. 2) Approve Resolution No. 02-012, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Acquire Fee and Easement Interests in Certain Rea/ Property Located in Riverside County, California, by Eminent Domain, that is Necessary for the Realignment and Improvement of State Route 74, between Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to 7t' Street in Perris (Segments 1 and 2) ", declaring that the acquisition of fee and easement interests in certain real property located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as APNs 347-100-016 (Segment 1), 349- 080-021, 349-080-036, 349-080-046, 349-080-053, 349-080- 014, 349-080-058, 349-080-059, 349-080-009, 349-080-047, 349-080-002, 349-080-003, 349-080-001 (Segment 2) (Project Parcel Nos. 13547-1 (Segment 1), 13610-1, 13611-1, 2, 13612- 1, 13614-1, 2, 13615-1, 2, 13617-1, 13618-1, 13619-1, 13620- 1, 13621-1, 2, 3, 13622-1, 13624-1 (Segment 2)), by Eminent Domain is necessary for the Realignment and Improvement of State Route 74 Between Dexter Avenue and 7th Street (Segments 1 and 2). APN 347-100-016 (Parcel No. 13547-1, Segment 1) identified in this Resolution was previously included in Resolution No. 01-001. Resolution No. 02-012 incorporates an increase in the acquisition area due to updated property information from the County of Riverside. 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 4 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Bob Buster requested Agenda Item No. 71, "Recommendations for Station Management Strategic P/an"; be pulled from the Consent ,Calendar for discussion. M/S/C (Wilson/Buydos) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 7A. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Support - Federal Bills HR 3694 and S 1917, Oppose - State Board of Equalization proposed Regulation 1533.2, Support - Policy position associated to pending State Legislation related to State Board of Equalization proposed Regulation 1533.2 on diesel fuel tax exemption for agriculture and food processing purposes, Oppose - SB 1262 (Torlakson); and, 2) Receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. 7B. RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2002 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FINANCIAL RESOLUTION AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-011, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON CERTIFYING THAT THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY HAS RESOURCES TO FUND PROJECTS IN FISCAL YEARS 2002-2003 THROUGH 2007-2008 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AFFIRMING COMMITMENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL PROJECTS IN THE PROGRAM" Adopt Resolution 02-011, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Certifying that the Riverside County Has Resources to Fund Projects in Fiscal Years 2002-2003 to 2007-2008 Transportation Improvement Program and Affirming Commitment to Implement All Projects in the Program" certifying that the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) submitted for inclusion in the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) FY 2002 through FY 2008 Regional TIP is financially constrained. 7C. TDA AND MEASURE "A" AUDIT RESULTS Receive and file the TDA and Measure "A" Audit Results Report. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 5 7D. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the months ending November and December 2001. 7E. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS 1) Adjust the STA budget to better reflect the expenditures in the capital and the operating budgets; and, 2) Adjust the Measure "A" Western County. Transit budget. 7F. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ending December 31, 2001. 7G. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORTS Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Reports for the month ending January 31, 2002. 7H. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE Grant the City of Riverside a six-month extension to October 31, 2002, to complete the Wells Avenue sidewalk project. 7J. LA SIERRA STATION EXPANSION 1) Amend the Commuter Rail Short Range Transit Plan and allocate $9 million for the acquisition of land and Phase 1 and 2 expanded La Sierra Station parking: $6.2 million in FTA Section 5307 funds, $1.8 million in STA funds, and $1 million in Measure "A" funds; and, 2) Approve in concept the partnership with Riverside Public Utilities to install a photovoltaic carport structure at the La Sierra Station. 7K. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR STATION GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT THE FOUR METROLINK STATIONS IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1) Authorize the release of a Station Grounds Maintenance Service RFP to provide services at the four Metrolink Stations in Riverside County; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 6 2) Approve the formation of an evaluation/selection committee, comprised of Commissioners Robin Lowe and Janice Rudman from the Plans and Programs Committee, a representative from SCRRA, and the City of Riverside, and two RCTC staff, to review, evaluate, and rank all RFP'S received, interview short listed firms, and recommend a firm; and, 3) Bring back to the Commission for final approval. 7L. ADVERTISE CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE NEW NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK COMMUTER RAIL STATION 1) Authorize staff to advertise construction bids for the new North Main Corona Metrolink Commuter Rail Station; and, 2) Bring back to the Commission the results of the bidding for contract award to the lowest, responsive bidder. 7M. COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 AND FISCAL YEAR 2002- 2003 FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS - PUBLIC BUS AND COMMUTER RAIL Receive and file the comparison of FY 01-02 and FY 02-03 first and second quarter ridership information for public bus and commuter rail. 7N. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 70. TRANSIT OASIS STRATEGY Receive and file the Draft Transit Oasis Strategy. 7P. SPECIALIZED TRANSIT PROGRAM MEASURE "A" CALL FOR PROJECTS 1) Authorize staff to release the Measure "A" Specialized Transit two-year Call for Projects covering western Riverside County; 2) Review the criteria and identify additional services and/or population groups that may need specialized transit services through the Commission's Specialized Transit Program - Measure "A" Call for Projects; 3) Appoint Commissioner Alfred W. Trembly as the Commission representative to be seated on the Evaluation Committee; and, 4) Reserve $300,000 funding to support matching of Section 5310 federal capital grants program. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 7 • 7Q. MEASURE "A" PARK AND RIDE LEASE PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Park and Ride Lease Program Update as an information item. 7R. PURCHASE OF RIDESHARE MATCHING SOFTWARE • 1) Authorize the Chairman to execute Agreement No. 02-41-052, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, with Multisystems, Inc. for the purchase of rideshare matching software and on -call software support services in an amount not to exceed $140,000; 2) Approve a budget adjustment of $190,000 for the execution of this contract, the purchase of computer hardware to support the rideshare matching function and for minor computer programming to ensure Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) service to local employers; and, 3) Direct staff to issue solicitations for data entry services and mail house services to support rideshare matching. 7S. AWARD AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-051 TO DMJM +HARRIS FOR STATE ROUTE 60 HOV WIDENING PROJECT IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY 1) Award Agreement No. 02-31-051 (Amendment No. 5 to RO-2042) to DMJM + Harris in the amount of $270,000 for additional engineering design, landscaping for soundwalls, and preparation of storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP); and, 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission. 7T. ADDITIONAL LOCAL MATCH FUNDING REQUEST FOR THE STATE ROUTE 79 REALIGNMENT PROJECT IN THE VICINITY OF THE CITIES OF SAN JACINTO AND HEMET Approve $700,000 of Western County Formula SB 45 2% Planning, Programming and Monitoring funds to complete the local match requirement for the $4.5 million of TEA 21 Demonstration Project funding for the SR 79 Realignment Project. 7U. AWARD OF OFFICE SYSTEMS AND FURNITURE Approve the selection of Seal Furniture and Systems, Inc. for the purchase and installation of office systems and furniture. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 8 7V. ACQUISITION OF DIGITAL COPIER Approve to replace its Xerox copier with two Canon Image Runner 105 Digital copiers under a Municipal Lease Agreement. 7W. PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE Approve the purchase and installation of 37 workstations - computer equipment and software - from Jaguar Computer Systems, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $81,896.94. 8. PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 BUDGET Ivan Chand, Chief Financial Officer, reviewed the proposed Policy Goals and Objectives for FY 2002-03. Commissioner Tom Mullen stated that he supports the goods movement but wants to ensure that there is not an increase in traffic on any rail lines through Riverside County. He also urged the Commission to oppose the high-speed rail route from Los Angeles to San Jose due to Federal Administration budget cuts and because there is no benefit to the Inland Empire. In addition, he recommended SCAG advocate an Inland Empire high-speed rail route. Commissioner Robin Lowe concurred with Commissioner Mullen's statement and believes that we should include our intent to participate in Southern California congestion relief. She also recommended that greater specificity be given to the grade separation project list item. Eric Haley recommended that wording should reflect that the Alameda Corridor East funding list includes 37 of the top 100 projects in Riverside County which was adopted by all four counties. Commissioner Ron Roberts concurred with Commissioner Mullen's statement believes that a high-speed rail route from San Diego to March Air Reserve Base would serve a greater number of passengers on a considerably shorter route. Commissioner John Chlebnik stated that he believes it should be made clear that there are greater priorities to be considered before high-speed rail projects are considered for funding. Commissioner Will Kleindienst recommended adding the Commission's adoption of the resolution to support the Inland Empire Airports First movement to the Goods Movement section. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 9 Commissioner Roberts indicated that SCAG voted to merge the Southern California MAGLEV program with the California/Nevada system to work cooperatively for future funding and recommends this be added to the Commission's Goals and Objectives. Chairman Tavaglione requested staff make the requested modifications. M/S/C (Mullen/Kleindienst) to approve the proposed Commission's Policy Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Budget with the incorporated recommendations. 9. METROLINK RIVERSIDE LINE ON -TIME PERFORMANCE David Solow, Chief Executive Officer of SCRRA, briefed the Commission on the Metrolink Riverside line on -time performance, highlighting the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) delay characteristics such as maintenance, dispatching, and scheduling practices. He indicated that at the SCRRA Executive Board meeting held on March 8th, they agreed to begin the cure process. He then reviewed the arbitration process. Commissioner Bob Buster requested more details on the arbitration process and if there have been any cases where arbitration resulted in construction improvements to the rail line by the railroad. David Solow responded that he was not aware of any such cases and indicated that any estimation of the outcome would be speculation. Commissioner Roberts recommended gathering letters from Federal and State officials and send a delegation from Riverside County to the UPRR headquarters to express the extreme dissatisfaction with their service. Commissioner Joy Defenbaugh concurred with Commissioner Roberts recommendation and also indicated that her office has kept a log of the traffic delays and public complaints received about the Riverside line over the past four years. Commissioner Mullen also concurred with Commissioner Roberts recommendation and believes UPRR is an irresponsible corporation and needs to be confronted directly. Commissioner Lowe also concurred with Commissioner Roberts recommendation and asked that a paper be prepared to provide to our delegation on this issue. She also recommended resolutions be obtained from the cities and the county. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 10 Commissioner Robert Schiffner asked if SCRRA has developed a list of necessary improvements and related costs. David Solow indicated that they did not have a currently list of necessary improvements. Commissioner Kleindienst indicated he believes the Commission also needs to develop a solution it deems necessary to correct the problem. M/S/C (Lowe/Defenbaugh) to approve: 1) Receive and file the status report provided by SCRRA staff on the Riverside Line On -Time Performance; 2) Request that SCRRA pursue all available efforts to ensure the enforcement of priority treatment contained in the Riverside Operating Agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad Company; and, 3) Obtain resolutions from the cities, county, state, and federal officials and support a delegation to travel to UPRR headquarters to present the Commission's position. 10. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 71. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN Commissioner Buster expressed his concern that some of the cities in which stations are located responded that they did not have the available funds to assist in station operations. It is his understanding that cities and counties of other lines are fully responsible for station operations. Eric Haley noted in light of Proposition 42 and the renewal of Measure "A", staff is recommending that the station operations funding issue be tabled until resolution of both ballot measures in Winter 2003. M/S/C (R. Wilson/Buydos) to: 1) Finalize the Station Parking Expansion Plan, in priority order, to include: North Main Corona, La Sierra, and the Riverside - Downtown Station; 2) Forward the Station Operating Funding Deficit issue to the Strategic Development Transition Committee (as determined by the Commission) in Winter 2002 in conjunction with the review of the Local Transportation Fund 80/20 funding policy; and, 3) Establish the Rail Station Advisory Council. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes March 13, 2002 Page 11 • • 11. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR A. Commissioner Roy Wilson gave a brief report on the Unmet Transit Needs Hearing held in Blythe on March 8. B. Commissioner Lowe reported that SCAG is recommending $500,000 for CETAP efforts in their FY 2002-2003 budget. Also, the Regional Council increased the request for MAGLEV funds to $7 million. C. Commissioner Kleindienst requested a report of the estimated revenue that Proposition 42 willgenerate for the Riverside County by city. D. Eric Haley gave a brief report on the Proposition 42 vote statistics and estimated revenue. He also briefed the Commission on the license plate study that will be taking place on SR 91. 12. CLOSED SESSION ITEM Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) Significant exposure to litigation to subdivision (b): Number of potential cases: 1 There were no announcements on the Closed Session item. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, April 10, 2002, at the Chancellor's Conference Room, University of California at Riverside, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, California, 92501. Aspectfull`y�, submitted, 'C'L-Q-a_ ELL,- Nat Ko nha Clerk of the Board " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : A p r i l 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e L o u i e M a r t i n , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t C o n t r o l s M a n a g e r B i l l H u g h e s , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : C o n t r a c t s C o s t a n d S c h e d u l e R e p o r t s B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e C o n t r a c t s C o s t a n d S c h e d u l e R e p o r t s f o r t h e m o n t h e n d i n g F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 0 2 . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : T h e a t t a c h e d m a t e r i a l d e p i c t s t h e c u r r e n t c o s t a n d s c h e d u l e s t a t u s o n c o n t r a c t s r e p o r t e d b y p r o j e c t s , c o m m i t m e n t s , a n d c o o p e r a t i v e a g r e e m e n t s e x e c u t e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . F o r e a c h c o n t r a c t a n d a g r e e m e n t , t h e r e p o r t l i s t s t h e a u t h o r i z e d v a l u e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , p e r c e n t a g e o f c o n t r a c t a m o u n t e x p e n d e d t o d a t e a n d t h e p r o j e c t e x p e n d i t u r e s b y r o u t e w i t h s t a t u s f o r t h e m o n t h e n d i n g F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 2 0 0 2 . A t t a c h m e n t s 0 0 0 0 0 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ROUTE 60•PROJECTS Final Design HOV 60/215 to Redlands Blvd, (2042) (30i{ 000�) 3� 'a{r��?It�"�•• i�• 1sfl7!t0'0?1iti •life`'!!! ?='liii''"?!!i: !!i .,•...•... :iii. ,iii. .:iii ROUTE 74 PROJECTS Engineering/EnvIron/ROW (R02041 9954,9966, (R02142) (R02141) (214 'r' 0)i(3001) ii i�'' ��16. �i . ...:. ... .... ..iiiliiii.,. ,,. iii • •': •,i: ROUTE 79 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ,/RO W (3003) Realignment study & Right turn lanes (R09961) f:f .• ,�• l:i?iii ROUTE 86 PROJECTS Avenue 58 to Avenue 66 (Segment 2) • Avenue 66 to Avenue 82 (Segment 3) • " (Caltrans Funded Projects) ✓4 ���; ??!?: : �•�� '111:1 •t•1, ;iii1,ii 1111.:. . .'[�i • 1;11'1 ROUTE 91 PROJECTS Soundwall design, ROW and construction (R09101 9337,9847,9861,9848,9832,9969,2043) (2058) (2144) (2136) (3600) Van Buren Blvd. Frwy Hook Ram p (R09535) Sndwall Landscaping (1,09933,9946,9945,2059) ,? .. :f'1, 1 .•'i . !tt t ,�. ,1'1pr''i �+,W: • t .,! ? • ..!!111,1 , � , , t , , . , , . , ,,,•n:pt:ttr:,:i:.:,p??itit?:f:;t:;;:;taa:::lit!!?!1111!? ROUTE 111 PROJECTS (R09219, 9227,9234,9623,9525,9530,9537,9538) 9540,9635,'9743,9849.9851,9857,9629i'�340: 1) f' 't!'''' '°?° a?i?? :111!!. •t? !;!: • :,' 1111?1111, 1111 t:t ti: U• . , , , , ..:}h:, ..�, . •� 111.1.11 Ali RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY/ R OJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE C OMMISSI ON AUTHORIZED ALLOCATI ON $3,111,749 $15,011,132 :1011 3't $870,049 fii .!?i; $20,253,000 $33,860,000 $11,902,100 $2,954,000 $1,603,450 61aa $16,946,856 CONTRACTURAL C OM MITMENTS TO DATE 11111111 $3,021,891 $15,011,132 $770,049 iii $19,500,000 $33,760,000 $10,374,324 $2,954,000 $1,603,450 S3 I:�ii 77 $15,530,856 'i� D• 85• Page 1 of 3 % COM MITTED AGAINST AUTH. ALLOCATION 88.5% •j:' j1,i 97.1% 100.0% 96,3% 99.7 % 87.2% 100.0% 100.0% . .11.. 1..1,., •� 91,6% EXPENDITURE FOR MONTH ENDED 02/28/02 $171,586 17'1;x$6 $224,024 $38,068 11111111111111111111.......:011 Project Complete Project. Complete 11111111111111111111 ;t; $90,874 $0 $o $1,588 % EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE $1,313,295 $6,841,574 $500,619 $18,060,000 $31,013,510 $9,371,684 $2,109,519 $788,584 $14,052,042 :? iS'1+I+05S1?� 43,5% .iii•iii..:1il.. . • .. 1114 f 45.6 % iii . . iii .. ii, . ..,iii..,.... y 65,0% 1!111! • , . , 11111!11!!1,!, 1114.00 92.6% 91.9% 90,3% 71.4% 90,5% 00000 RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE , COMMISSION • CONTRACTURAL %, COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES PROJECT AUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 02/28/02 TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE 1-218 PROJECTS Prelim inary Engrg/Environ. (R09008, 9018) $6,726,504 $5,878,173 87,4% $5,704,897 , 97.1 % .. iiiii .,., ::I '127 : ••t• •1 �$i: iI?i;:.iii;•. , §;�`;.,�......... ..... ........._,...,,,,...,,, iI1• ?ii iii ,, • .,,.,:.•:�1..�:. , ..,.,.��•`•..� q. .�. .•tit .,. ,,, ;I;i=i{• 1111, ,,,,.•., iii ii, ..iii';;:{{i?iii{i{IIiII{i{{, ., ,,•, • b: ;. f.{•, ., :{:{:{:{iii ii ,.. . :.:.; .:. . •i{ r� , , �� t: •Ii :;:;:, a=,: ;li• i.:110 f iiiii :i:••;:,1, :::• '': obi ,. INTERCHANGE IMPROV. PROGRAM Yuma IC Landscaping (R09926,9946) $440,000 $400,000 90.9% $0 $312,519 78.1% , i• , •! ,! . ,j �A A' �{ 1;I=. •.t{, r;=r.., . +.©, . ill:l; 6•. •' . , .... ,•.: �•:•, � .. . ,.f•.•�,:.::::;:::;:i:;:i:;:i; {: {. :. :,{:_'="=ii:i; is{t iiiii?:iii='='='• •, :Iii? aa y �. i• y �.c•o �i T! .:. iiiii. . ;•;I:.!•:,: *a .:jl?:::',. `o�' n�' .+f'• •.:T�• . �, iiiii � 2 .... , iiiii:. :1=i=':Ill'=• 1111111° .,. , I e :I;i�:i;::I'r,Ii:Ali:i , .. � ... � � .. !ii iii l;;;?; {:;:{;{:{:::,,, ':1': .. ....1: �•�•... � . =?=iI?=!=ifi=?=�'' •' ?!:?: '•� � •. , iiiii?;;'?Il=!:, : . iiI•• i1'b' III.. >1 , .•i•'�' , PROJECT & CONSTR. MGMT SERV. (RO 2100.);.•.:.••:••• ••:•••• .t..• ,.•,,..,.• :•+ an••: • iiii•: •• •.•.i•n : ;• ••', • S 3. . , ?2i•t.i.•?!?{? :IS !•,• iii:;' !•• .{ . .i•, !' ! : !ii iii ,i,•!{ ,•I. •i: i iiiii iiiii i.: §��;7�:��44>€.,it•i=ai:t;:::I:`.f:.,,.•...,.. $2,300,000 iiiii: ;• •' i{!;. . t :•:r'•=•: a=•=' .;; !:{ s ' iI,••,I��►iiiii.+,.. 02,223,816 •:.i•:.i.. .:•:.5.:•:.:.:,f .: t •:•• : .; t;.y :i :. '' 1IQ:; s�.. .,,...•�S•,.•..••••.,,..,,,, 96,7% : •'•t•:•;•;•:•3•:•:•I ,;,=r',=:::_:_.,.. e' II!IfIIIIII. AS 0149,051 ,{ E?:?!?:i{:ii ' :1; W ., ...,.. ...,.,., $941,685 . •:•,,; :, •:.,•:•:•i•; , i' .. i : S i i . tk;;•;'! .;1;{::.:•.;=1;lt?: •.;•;. I:IR 1 , ••••• , iiiii, 42.3% • ,:•:;' iiiii„:•;,:.::;; !•' iiiii, ...•s t •;'! , .I. i;•• ,_:•: .,, I,•,.••,,•••.,l:i;:,,•••• •••,•: .. , • • , • ::•:•;•'•:•:• •, PROGRAM PLAN & SERVICES North/South Corridor study (R09936) 025,000 $25,000 100.0% ' 00 $0 0.0% •b4 ,• .I :t: :i :i , . t• S• :•S•:•:. :•1•:.: iii y�y�{ . :{; :ii •r:11 >��)���+,,':�••,••,• •......,.•.•.•,•, 1:=i�..,• .t, iiiii,• fi .i. � •..Iiiii.., iiiii :I;;::;•iii;111, I:•;' •i :i' �i•� � ............. •.'fii iii�iliiii!�i• :;i; {.,.;.. , .••,',.!':';,i::'.•. ..,.,s•.•„• ...•..• .• If': ,:,: i ' { ': {.,.;.,., iiii i , f. .11 y1? : ? i, . 'i::"•'• is• •• ", i'i : ii , ii: . •*. ,'•t e' :! �lf t • .. ,. .. ••i ..... . PARK- N-RiDE/INCENT. PROGRAM (RO 9859) (2101.2117) (9813) (2146) (9917) $2,100,814 $2,100,814 100.0% $129,945 $1,156,138 55,0% •i• .; ,.:•t,;.;,:.;••.:,:•:••.;,I• , .:,t•1•: i i{• It' • i ' t . is ►�jj }� ,': iiiii i;. i s :.! • 'i:. y?l'!�1.:�1•!'i:�,i �,I?1��,�T1•.:i::f::ii,.t:. , . ;1{t;:j t:. � , �;{:... � f:;:;;•::_:_•: i i iiii iRfi:l��il . � ..:I1.:7?.. .. iiiii ::ii:•::::: iiiii , •s iiiii .. �•i iiii. � . 'iii °4 :1111::::: iiiii.. � iiiii .;,i.:.;•h:.:.:,: •; •:.;:.;, •1•. •.••'. •$1• .�I .. • .. iii i i , .. .. .iiiii:?:E:E.;•,•,•,.,•,•••,•• .; iiiii:. i•:.t,•.;.;,:.AS•; :i:i=iiiii• ,�� •: � Ii a' j {{ .1•TT•T1:} •:::•;': ;d h,;•:•;•7a;: ., 7 I i•.•... , ; ; iiiii •0 4 :;• •tiii;Ilifi' I , . , . . COMMUTER RAIL Studies/Engineering $4,318,070 $3,925,518 90,9% 0440,186 $3,482,040 88,7% (RO 9420;9731,9832,9833,9844;9854,9956,2028) R02031,2027,2120,2029„2128,3800.3807) • Station/sIte Acq/OP Costs/Maint. Costs (0000,2026,2056,4003-4007,,4198, 4199) .;.t.:•t • •:•:.•i,:.; t ::::•t•1•:•;•: , l, •, iiiii i =i'' .t : 1. i• is •i'i I: 1t :I' :1 :iii : °i� ••, �/�L1�iy►�jJ.:y ,{!� {��[yq'�L't' i i! 'is: i . !1 'lii'i, il! �Y��i;�,�?{!7,i,3:1�N!!;i• l,i'• '••�i:+iiiii T:.tit •i,.al.,.i::. {.,.,..•{fi • !I••i . Ii $13,190,402 I; ., . f; ifi'iII' :as!tt�. ,.,.+.,� . I i Ia .. i .. , ii ii i $13,190,402 �i �j ,'� q��1� .4 QI 1i' !���1,7....,• 3{1•,..iig.,•.•.., . I1.. • 100.0°% :;:iii:{: i,.,., , •.•, •. b 8• F 7�M i�- ilii?Iii!ii:::1::;I;H;::.,. ..... ,..ii!1ii°• $178,120 : ili!IBi I•••.•� 1R t• $4{033,3591 iiii{:' ilS:�'� 9 iiiii • ••: '� t •P. .•, •�.'t•,•• .1 iiis•:•; , . , • .. I , .•.. • =30.6% ?iii;:;:• •, . ;i{iiiii , !; •� •f , i i, ,• t;;I;':';=t'?Ii" .fi t . ,•E .. i f t s t ,•.. : • . • . . '• :: .,�••,, ': ,;•; f.;,:::,:;:;_;;•;•h;•;• •:.I•s t; •:,h,•=s=•=:' =i=•:;ttl=i'{;1,tt,•. , .i:li•i iiiii !!;. iiiiii.l.;,: ,• •!: I . •:t: •fi,!!;,•t •,••,•I.•:t•'•;•!• ,,, .I.. ! 1. . {• i,. i •:.l;,l, •=t, .:t:, .f, ii,{?, 'i {:. i? :fi���+?4�i:•, Imo, , iiii,, .:fl{ f 1.,,:.1.:•:• :•t.i•:.:• .t...• •: •:•{ • 1• . .I�I�'e�. t��,lh� ';:s.••. 't=::;I•:; i;it1l1• °;Iii•:•. •• �3 6 1i i�• 4 . �' s .��� :: 1: I , 1 . !ii?i!,; • '1'!?iii{,.,,.,, iiiii : f•1 ::."ii, iiiii°. •. 1'+ ,. �1i � 1i!ii{i:,i•1.1•:::.:• .... , �• :::t::;::;::I;;•:• t;:•I:;:::; : ?•11:•:•;••,•• :; ,:S'i` �1�1 2•. . , .. , . �. a4#e. • 1::::;;::::11•;:::1;11 :,:::,',:iS , •., ?•:•:•t••,. .,SS''''` � . �, , , ..#00.14,40:5...1.:.1.;•: .;.;.;,;,: •:.:1:::•.1,1A4. ,,,:':;1100;'x; ,yi,:,t;i•::5;,': I i . , . i , iiiii t ............:• • ;. :i.b;, Page2of3 000a. " P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N C I T Y O F C A N Y O N L A K E R a l l r o a d C a n y o n R d I m p r o v e m e n t s C I T Y O F C O R O N A S m i t h , M a p l e &