Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10 October 6, 1986 Citizens Advisory040244 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1:30 P.M., MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1986 RIVERSIDE CITY HALL 5TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 3900 MAIN STREET, RIVERSIDE 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of Minutes. 3. Quarterly Transit Operations Report. 4. RTA and SunLine Efforts To Reduce Subsidies/ Increase Fare Revenues. 5. Banning/Beaumont to Hemet Service. 6. SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects. 7. Adjournment (INFO.) (DISC.) (INFO.) (INFO.) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting No. 5-86 July 7, 1986 1. Call to Order. The meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee was called to order by Chairman Terry Allen at 1:35 P.M. on July 7, 1986 at the Riverside Transit Agency Administrative Center, 1825 Third Street, Riverside. Members present: Terry H. Allen Harry Brinton Jordis Cameron Members not present: Marian Carpelan Rena Parker Bertram Vinson Bill Freeman Jim Kenna Herb Krauch Don Kurz Joanne Moore Don Senger Shiela Velez Ran Wyder Others present: Scott Carpenter, Riverside Transit Agency Jesse Roach, Riverside Transit Agency 2. Approval of Minutes. M/S/C (CAMERON/KENNA) to approve the minutes of the May 5, 1986 meeting. 3. Transit Operations Quarterly Report. Paul Blackwelder, Assistant Director, informed the Committee that total ridership in the third quarter was 1.22 million passengers. Total operating costs increased 17.2% over last year. The year- to-date costs were 16.9% higher than last year primarily due to higher insurance premiums paid by transit operators and service expansions. Subsidy per passenger trip has gone up from $1.71 to $1.89. RTA's average subsidy per passenger trip increased by 14.9% and SunLine's subsidy per passenger trip remained the same as last year because of increased ridership. Both RTA and Sun - Line are projecting to meet the minimum required fare revenue ratios next year without increasing transit fares. Bill Freeman inquired on the type of service that the SunLine intervalley handicapped dial -a -ride provides. Paul Blackwelder responded that the service is provided in the morning and the afternoon to transport handicapped people to the Fetch Center. 1 4. Highway 79 (Lambs Canyon) Update. Copies of Nick Davies' letter indicating the status on improve- ments to Lambs Canyon were distributed to Committee members. Herb Krauch stated that Caltrans kept the warning sign at the same location but moved it higher and drivers are now able to view cars coming down the grade. The missing reflectors, though, have not been replaced. Paul Blackwelder stated that Nick Davies acknowledged that guard- rails are needed in some segments of Lambs Canyon and Caltrans has included the guardrail project in the program. However, because the project is such of low priority, it will take ap- proximately two years for the guardrails to be installed. Joanne Moore reported that Caltrans have made improvements to the turnouts along Route 74 (Ortega). 5. Additional Items. A. Chairman Allen informed the Committee that he had met with Tex Williams, who supervises the Hemet dial -a -ride service to discuss service problems. The main problem is that buses are tied up between the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. when handicapped children are trans- ported to and from the centers. Tex Williams was invited to become a member of the Hemet Chamber of Commerce Transportation Committee in an effort to resolve operational problems. Other members of that committee are Jesse Roach and Scott Carpenter of RTA. B. Herb Krauch noted from previous RCTC minutes that limited service is available (via Line 27 and Meditrans) to Loma Linda Hospital. He pointed out that when the service be- tween the San Gorgonio Pass area and Hemet is initiated, residents from the Pass area would be able to use the Beaumont service to Loma Linda. C. Scott Richardson, Marketing Director of RTA, briefed the Committee on RTA's marketing program which includes: 1) an RTA awareness campaign; 2) efforts to attract ridership on low patronized routes; 3) hiring a Community Relations Representative; and, 4) improving the information center's efficiency. He announced that RTA will now be doing the advertising in-house and that service announcements and radio advertisements will be increased. He informed the Commission members of RTA's plan to redesign the bus tickets. He is also working with the Riverside Beautifi- cation Campaign in an effort to develop ways to keep bus stops clean. He informed the Committee that an open house for the public to view the new Maintenance/Administration Center will be held on September 19th. 2 6. RTA Maintenance/Administration Center Tour. The Committee members were divided into two groups and toured RTA's Maintenance/Administration Center. 7. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 3:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Paul Blackwelder Assistant Director nk 3 DATE October 6, 1986 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE NAME -7' CO - REPRESENTING PHONE 1\0.-\, _ z I cri . . A , C� 6U-39,3 C771 -n _ -t• <z 95&'-)97 27y_ 77/ fry Em ITEM NO. 3 R IVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO: Citizens Advisory Committee FROM: Paul Blackwelder, Assistant Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Transit Operations Report The attached table and graphs show transit operations data for the Riverside County public transit operators during the fourth quarter of the year, April 1, 1986 -June 30, 1986. The infor- mation needed to prepare this report was provided by the oper- ators. Ridership Total ridership in the fourth quarter was 1.2 million passengers, an increase of 2.7% over the fourth quarter of last year. Attachment II shows that ridership in the fourth quarter has risen in each of the last 5 years. The most significant increase was 20.1% reported by the SunLine Transit Agency (see Attachment III). Ridership for the full fiscal year 1985/86 was 4.6 million passengers, an increase of 7.1% over the previous year. Annual ridership has increased in each of the past 3 years. The FY 1985/86 ridership is 30.2%% higher than FY 1982/83. Operating Costs And Bubsidies Total operating costs for the fourth quarter were $2.8 million. Total costs for the year were $10.9 million, an increase of 12.8% over last year. The cost increase was primarily caused by much higher insurance costs and an increase in service of approximate- ly 8%. The cost increase was higher than the ridership increase and the average subsidy per passenger increased from $1.79 last year to $1.91 this year. Attachments V and VI show the subsidy per passenger trip for services operated by RTA and by SunLine during the fourth quarter of the year. Efforts to reduce the high subsidy per passenger trip are discussed in Agenda Item 4. PB:nk Attachments Agenda Item No. 3 October 6. 1986 ATTACHMENT I QUARTERLY TRANSIT OPERATIONS REPORT RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT OPERATORS 4/1/86 TO 6/30/86 R ancho Riversid e Ba nning Bea umo nt Coro na LETS PVVTA Mirage Spe c.Svcs. RTA Su nline TOTAL F.R. Passengers 18,732 25,705 749,706 288,710 1,082,853 DAR Pa sse ngers 15,337 17,415 1,677 874 31,881 36,434 13,301 116,919 Total Passengers 18,732 15,337 17,415 25,705 1,677 874 31,881 786,140 302,011 1,199,772 F. R.Ex pen se s $40,506 $54,494 $1,322,493 $890,348 $2,307,841 DAR Expense s $57,017 $61,039 $7,844 $4,564 $153,292 $207,809 $88,376 $579,942 Tota l Expens es $40,506 $57,017 $61,039 $54,494 $7,844 $4,564 $153,292 $1,530,302 $978,724 $2,887,783 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PASSENGERS PER VEHICLE HR. FIXED ROUTE 12. 77 NA NA 13.49 NA NA NA 24 .15 14.84 DIAL -A -RIDE NA 8.14 6. 91 NA 5.08 0.00 5 .19 5.41 3.99 COST PER VEHICLE HR. FIXED ROUTE $27.61 NA NA $28.59 NA NA NA $42 .60 $45.75 DIAL -A -RIDE NA $30.25 $24.21 NA $23. 77 NA $24.96 $30.84 $26.52 FARE REVENUE RATIO 14.9% 15.5% 21.0% 14. 1% 11.6% 20.2% 11.2% 20 .6% 18 .4% SUBSIDY/PASSENGER FIXED ROUTE $1.84 NA NA $1. 82 NA NA NA $1.38 $2 .50 DIAL -A -RIDE NA $3.14 $2.77 NA $4.14 $4.17 $4.27 $4.97 $5 .81 ATTACHMENT II TOTAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIDERSHIP 1,5 1.4 — 1.3 —4 1.2 7 1.1 — 1 0.9 — 0,8— 0.7 — 0.6 — 0.5 — 0.4 0.3 — 0.2 — 0.1 — 0 1,5 RJ 1=rf �- I f I r ! I I I I I I I i 1 i 1 1 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1964/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years FOURTH QUARTER RIDERSHIP TOTAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1.4 — 1.3 — 1.2 — 1,1 — 1 — 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 —4/ 0.4 0.3 -P 0.2 0.1 0 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years ATTACHMENT III SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIDERSHIP 500 400 300 200 /I\ tiA 100 0 1 I 1981/92 1962/83 1963/64 1904/05 1905/86 Fiscal Yeara FOURTH QUARTER RIDERSHIP SUNUNE TRANSIT AGENCY Fiscal Years ATTACHMENT IV RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIDERSHIP 900 10 BOO 700 600 500 400 300 900 c / 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years FOURTH QUARTER RIDERSHIP RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY B00 — 700 600 ~ �r v 500 f f f f ac m� $F 400 a 300 200 100 0 1981/82 1982/83 J / 1983/84 Flseal Years 1984/85 1985/86 ATTACHMENT V SUBSIDY PER PASSENGER RTA FOURTH QUARTER 10 9 - a- 7 — *4.00 Per Passenger 6 4 3 7- ✓ 7 — 7- 0 r' / 2 / F ✓ 7 / ✓ / T 7 / ✓ / / / ✓ / r / / ✓ 7 f ✓-% f V f / ✓ ✓ / ✓ F) / / / /J { / \\\\\\\\\\J / / / /J 15 16 14 29 25 13 12 21 22 24 17 18 27 30 19 P SC H Service FIXED ROUTES 2 Corona - Riv 1 Magnolia Av 15 Arlington Av 16 Moreno Valley - Riv 14 Indiana Av 29 Rubidoux 25 Riv - Loma Linda 13 Arlanza 12 California Av 21 Country Village - Tyler Mall 22 Perris - Riv 24 Lake Els. - Perris - Riv 17 U C R - Mag Center 18 Moreno Valley 27 Hemet - Perris - Riv 30 Hemet - San Jacinto 19 Moreno - Perris DIAL -A -RIDES f V / P Perris D -A -R SC Sun City D -A -R H Hemet/ San Jacinto D -A -R N Norco D -A -R ATTACHMENT VI SuCnIur 'EF•'; f r:ti,.K::.,':;E:Ni;ER SUNIJNE: FOURTH QUARTER $0,00 Per Passenger 10 i 9 . 8 - 7 - 6 4 -- 3 - SERVICE FIXED -ROUTES 20 Palm Springs - Coachella 19 DHS - Coachella PS Palm Springs Sun Special 2 Palm Springs Local MV Mt. View- 1000 Palms 4 La Quinta - Palm Desert PD Palm Desert Trolley DIAL -A -RIDES IV Intervalley Hdcp D -A -R PS Palm Springs D -A -R PD Palm Desert Dial -A -Ride PD Palm Desert Dial -A -Ride ATTACHMENT VII BANNING Tt AN IT RIDERSHIP @p N C C cg v7 p�p O 1981/82 1982/B3 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 50 40 30 20 10 0 Fiscal Years BEAUMONT DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP r i i i 1 I I I IT r I I I I r r 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years ATTACHMENT VIII CORONA DIAL -A -RIDE RIDERSHIP 50 40 30- 20 10 0 50 ! i I I I 1981/82 1982/83 r 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years LAKE ELSINORE TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 40 — 30 — 20 —' 10 -- 0 I I I 1981/82 I I I 1982/83 I I I I I 1983/84 1984/85 Fiscal Years I f f I 1985/86 ATTACHMENT IX RANCHO MIRAGE DIAL -A -CAB RIDERSHIP 10 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES RIDERSHIP 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 Fiscal Years ATTACHMENT X PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT RIDERSHIP 20 19 1S 17 16 — 15 — 14 13 — 12 — 11 10 — 9 — S 7 — 6 - 5 — 4- 3 — D i I I I I I r I t I I 1 I f I 1981/62 I982/B3 1983/54 1984/95 1995/6$ Flscol Year* AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO: Citizens Advisory Committee FROM: Paul Blackwelder, Assistant Director SUBJECT: RTA and SunLine Efforts to Reduce Subsidies/Increase Fare Revenues The State Transit Assistance Program was bluelined by the Governor in the State Budget for FY 1986/87. The result wars a reduction in transit revenues for Riverside County of approxi- mately $1.5 million. The majority of these funds were used for operating subsidies for the RTA and SunLine services with the remainder used for capital assistance for all of the public transit operators. The RTA and SunLine managers were advised of this funding cut and were requested to identify service reductions that should be made to reduce subsidy requirements and to consider fare increases to help offset the impact of re- duced funding. The additional funds required to fully subsidize these two operators will be provided from available TDA revenues. SunLIne Transit Agency The SunLine Transit Agency operated 11 services in FY 1986/87. The high subsidy per passenger services were the Palm Desert Trolley, the dial -a -ride services, and Line 4 (La Quinta-Palm Desert). In FY 1986/87, the Palm Desert Trolley will not be operated by SunLine. Saturday service on the Desert Hot Springs dial -a -ride will not be operated during the winter season. Con- tracts to provide dial -a -ride services have been revised to reduce the subsidy per passenger paid to the contractors pro- viding service in Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Cathedral City. Line 4 (La Quinta-Palm Desert) routing will be revised in November to serve a new school, an industrial complex and the Marriott Hotel complex expected to employ 1200 persons. Fare increases were not proposed for this fiscal year. The base fare is currently $0.50. There are zone fares of $0.25 each for up to four zones on the intercity lines 19 and 20. Transfers between lines cost $0.25. Since the majority of passengers travel more than one zone or transfer between lines, their one- way fare is already $0.75 or more. SunLine would rather increase fare revenue through increased ridership. The ridership increase this past year was 20.1%. A fare increase may be considered later in the year if ridership does not continue to increase as it has for the past two years. Agenda Item No. 4 October 6, 1986 Ri.yerside Transit Agency The Riverside Transit Agency operates considerably more service than SunLine providing more opportunity to identify reductions to improve efficiency. The majority of the fixed route RTA riders pay the base fare and no zone charges. The RTA base fare is $0.55 and has not been increased since April, 1984. A fixed route fare increase of $0.05 is being proposed for all fare categories. The increase is not expected to impact ridership and would generate an additional $153,000 in fare revenue. The high subsidy per passenger trip services operated by RTA are Line 30 (Hemet), Line 19 (Perris -Moreno Valley) and Line 17 '(UCR- Riverside Plaza). The attachments provided by RTA identify pro- posed reductions for these services and selected runs on other services on which ridership is low. Savings could be as high as $277,000 per year depending upon which services are eliminated. A representative from RTA will attend the meeting to discuss the proposed service changes and fare increase. Public hearings are scheduled to be held on October 22nd and 24th in San Jacinto, Hemet, Riverside and Moreno Valley to evaluate the proposals. The public will be notified of the hearings through notices in the newspaper and by flyers on RTA buses. PB:nk Attachments 771 rI RIVIgiSVE 7RANSTTAG9VCY 1 825 THIRD STREET • RIVERSIDE. CA 92507 (71 4) S94-0350 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Riverside Transit Agency will hold three public hearings on Wednesday, October 22, 1986, to receive comments concerning proposed route and/or service changes to Route 30 in the Hemet/San Jacinto arga. The times, locations, and alternatives are as follows: LOCATIONS: 10:30 a.m. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1986, AT: San Jacinto Community Center West Room 625 South Pico Avenue San Jacinto, CA. 92383 1:30 p.m. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1986, AT: and Hemet City Council Chambers 7:30 p.m. 450 East Latham Avenue Hemet, CA. 92343 ALTERNATIVES FOR ROUTE #30 ALTERNATIVE #1 No Local Fixed Route A) Cut Route 30 and leave Routes.27E and 31 as -is. B) Cut Route 30 and extend Route 27E to Valle Vista. No change on Route 31 (connections for 27E and 31 at hospital). NOTE: DAR to pick-up the slack of Route 30 elimination. ALTERNATIVE #2• Support local fixed route concept. A) Stop 27E at Hemet Valley Mall and expand Route 31 to cover more (east and west) local service and add second bus. Connections with 27E at Hemet Valley Mall. B) Leave Routes 27E and 31 as -is and restructure Route 30 (Route 32) for East/West coverage. 2 C) Cut Route 27E at Hemet Valley Mall. Extend Route 31 to Hemet Valley Mall to connect with 27E and 32. Restructure Route 30 (Route 32) for East/West coverage. NOTE: All three of above Alternative #2 options would require restructuring of the DAR System to: a) 24 -hour advance reservation. b) 24 -hour advance reservations, restrict to only E & H. c) Restrict DAR to 1/4 mile limits from fixed route. d) Consider cutting DAR back to Soboba if Alternate 1.6. is used. SPECIAL NOTE: If Alternate 2A or C is used, Route 27E schedule would be adjusted to stop at Tyler Mall and Riverside Downtown Terminal each trip (inbound and outbound).' At these hearings, the Riverside Transit Agency will afford an opportunity for interested persons or agencies to be heard with respect to the service alter- natives. IF YOU C'AN'T ATTEND Written comments should be sent to the Riverside Transit Agency, to the attention of Jesse Roach, 1825 Third Street, Riverside, CA. 92507, by October 22, 1986. 1 825 THIRD STREET • RIVERSIDE, CA 92507 • (71 4) 684-0860 RNF.RSOE TRAIYSITAGFJULY RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Riverside Transit Agency will hold two public hearings on Friday, October 24, 1986, to receive comments concerning proposed route and/or service changes on several fixed routes, and a proposed fare change. The times, locations, and proposed service changes are as follows: LOCATIONS: 10:00 a.m., Friday, October 24, 1986 Riverside City Council Chambers 3900 Main Street Riverside, CA. 1:30 p.m., Friday, October 24, 1986 Moreno Valley Unified School District District Board Room #2 13911 Perris Blvd. Moreno Valley, CA. (corner of Perris Blvd. and Alessandro Blvd.) PROPOSED ROUTE AND/OR SERVICE CHANGES It has been proposed to eliminate several trips due to low ridership. These trips are: Route 1: Weekday 5:21 a.m. - Outbound 9:27 p.m. - Inbound 9:57 p.m. - Inbound 10:48 p.m. - Outbound (stop at Tyler Mall) Route 12: Weekday 6:36 p.m. - Inbound Route 14: Saturday 7:20 a.m. Outbound 8:05 a.m. Inbound Route 17: Weekday Complete elimination or reduce service to six hours daily; three a.m. round trips and three p.m. round trips. 2 Route 18: Route 19: Route 21: Route 22: Route 25: Route 27E: Weekday and Saturday 6:10 p.m. - Outbound 6:40 p.m. - Inbound Weekday Reduce service hours from 7:10 a.m. to 7:45 p.m. to only eight hours daily. Proposed service hours from 9:10 a.m. to 5:05 p.m. Saturday Complete elimination. Saturday 7:03 a.m. - Inbound 7:45 p.m. Outbound Weekday 6:50 p.m. - Outbound Sunday 7:26 a.m. - Outbound Saturday 9:40 a.m. - Outbound Weekday and Saturday Combine the last two outbound trips, 4:50 p.m. and 5:50 p.m. into one outbound trip. The trip would stop at both the• Downtown Terminal and Tyler Mall before going outbound to Hemet. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED FARE CHANGE It has been proposed to change fares as follows: 1. Increase Adult, Student, and Elderly/Handicapped base fare by five cents. 2. Increase monthly pass charge by $2.00. 3. Eliminate all ticket sales. At these hearings, the Riverside Transit Agency will afford an opportunity for interested persons or agencies to be heard with respect to the service alter- natives. IF YOU CAN'T ATTEND: Written comments should be sent to the Riverside Transit Agency, to the attention of Jesse Roach, 1825 Third Street, Riverside, CA. 92507, by October 24, 1986. AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO: Citizens Advisory Committee FROM: Paul Blackwelder, Assistant Director SUBJECT: Status of Banning/Beaumont to Hemet Route The Riverside Transit Agency started a new transit service, Route 31, from Banning/Beaumont to Hemet on September 8, 1986. The new service operates. Monday -Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on a 90 -minute fequency. Transfers between Route 31 and the local services in Banning and Beaumont are coordinated at the San Gorgonio Pass Hdspital. The fare is $0.80 one way with a 50% discount for elderly and handicapped persons. Passengers trans- ferring from the local services in the Pass area are charged $0.25. Ridership on this new line during the first three weeks of service has been as follows: 9/8-9/12 9/13-9/19 9/22-9/26 Monday 26 33 30 Tuesday 58 32 28 Wednesday 82 41 Thursday 76 26 Friday 124 27 Total 366 Avg/Day 73 159 32 This service was started as an experimental service for 6 months to determine actual demand for service from the Pass area to Hemet. The need for service was identified in the Commission's unmet transit needs hearings and in a study conducted by RTA with assistance from Commission staff. The goal for successful oper- ation after 6 months is an average of 70 passengers per day with a subsidy/passenger trip of no more than $4.00. The RTA marketing efforts to date have included the following. Fares were not charged during the first week of service. News releases were mailed to radio stations and newspapers in the area. Feature articles on the new service appeared in the Hemet News, San Jacinto Register and the Banning Gazette. Schedules are made available through the local operators in the Pass area and in Hemet. The Beaumont representative to the RTA Board, Councilman Fred Shaw, indicates that he is promoting the service to seniors and other groups he contacts throughout the city. The San Jacinto representative to the RTA Board, Councilman Marc Divine, provided RTA staff with additional suggestions for ad- vertising and schedule distribution which will be accomplished by the RTA staff. PB:nk Agenda Item No. 5 October 6, 1986 AcTenda Item No. 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Barry Beck, Executive Director SUBJECT: FY 1986/87 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Program Eleven projects have been submitted for funding under the FY 1986/87 SB 821 Program. The SB 821 Project Evaluation Committee, consisting of members of the Commission's Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees, have reviewed the projects. Attached is the priority list and recommended allocations developed by the Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee recommends full funding for the top 7 ranked projects. Because of insufficient remaining funds, the Committee recommends only partial funding for the Blythe and Palm Desert projects. The representative from Blythe agreed to downscope their project to a cost of $20,000. The allocation to Palm Desert should be contingent on Palm Desert providing local funds necessary to fully fund the project. RECOM €ENDATION Approve the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Program recommended by the SB 821 Project Evaluation Committee. BB:nk Attachment RCTC Agenda Item No. 6 September 18, 1986 SEIS 21 PROJECT PRIORITY LIST SPONSORING RANH AGENCY PROJECT FUNDS RECOMMENDED REQUESTED ALLOCATION 1 PALM SPRINGS 2 HEMET 3 MORENO VALLEY 4 RIVERSIDE 5 COUNTY 6 COUNTY 7 DES HOT SPGS 8 PALM DESERT 9 BLYTHE 10 LA QUINTA 11 DES HOT SPGS 1Allocation to provide 2Allocation downscoped VISTA CHINO CONST. BIKEWY & SIDEWALK WEST HEMET BIKEWAYS CONSTRUCT BIKEWAYS. VARIOUS LOCATIONS CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS. CENTRAL AV, CHICAGO TO FAIRVIEW CONSTRUCT BIKEWAY COLUMBIA ST,RAMONA SCH. TO JOHNSTON AVENUE. CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS. GRAND AVE. NW OF RTE. 74 TO DOOLITTLE. CONSTRUCT BIKEWAY. HACIENDA AV, WEST DR TO PALM CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK MAGNESIA FALLS BIKEWAY CONSTRUCT BIKEWAY. CHANSLOR WAY CONSTRUCT SIDEWALKS. EISENHOWER DR. & 50TH AVE. CONSTRUCT BIKEWAYS BIKEWAY SYSTEM PLANNING AND ENGINEERING $23,683 $14,960 $74,764 $100,000 $14,000 $50,000 $16,000 $108,056 $76,690 $111,300 $6,000 of SB821 funds subject to commitment by Palm Desert local funding sufficient to fully fund project. $23,683 $14,960 $74,764 $100,000 $14,000 $50,000 $16,000 $17,9001 $20,0002 $0 $0 of SB821 funds subject to Blythe submitting a revised, project consisting of only the construction of sidewalks. 09 -Sep -86