HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 2014-06-24LSA-SP(PDF)
CITY OF LYNWOOD As Successor Agency to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency Aide Castro, Mayor Edwin Hernandez, Mayor Pro-Tem Salvador Alatorre, Councilmember Maria T. Santillan-Beas, Councilmember
Jose Luis Solache, Councilmember This Agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered. Copies of the Staff reports or other written documentation relating to
each item of business referred to on the Agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for public inspection. Any person who has a question concerning any of the
agenda items may call the City Manager at (31 0) 603-0220, ext. 200. AGENDA ciTY oF LYNwooD As succEssoR AGENCY To THE D u \ Pasted LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY R E ~~ E I v ED EDWIN
HERNANDEZ MAYOR PRO-TEM JUNE 24, 2014 C SPECIAL MEETING 6:00P.M. LYNWOOD CITY HALL 11330 BULLIS ROAD AIDE CASTRO MAYOR JUN 2·3 2014 CITY OF LYNWOOD CITY CLERKS OFFICE \V\ o..r-(o...
Q.iw::;;one-c Cl-1-j C\e.r~ k:>j SALVADOR ALATORRE a--£?. COUNCILMEMBER MARIA TERESA SANTILLAN-SANTILLAN-SEAS COUNCILMEMBER JOSE LUIS SOLACHE COUNCILMEMBER CITY MANAGER SARAH MAGANA-WITHERS
CITY CLERK MARIA QUINONEZ CITY ATTORNEY DAVID A. GARCIA CITY TREASURER YOLANDA RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ
OPENING CEREMONIES: A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call (ALATORRE-SANTILLAN-BEAS-SOLACHE-HERNANDEZ-CASTRO) C. Certification of Agenda Posting by City Clerk PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Regarding Agenda Items Only) PUBLIC HEARING 1. ADOPTION OF THE FY 2014-15 BUDGET Comments: In April 2014, the City Council established several City subcommittees to strategically plan
and address key Citywide areas of concern, one of which is the Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee. The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee was established to review the existing City
organizational structure, identify Council budget priorities, and also to make budget recommendations during the budget process. The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee met with all departments,
received their proposed budgets, and made subsequent budget recommendations and recommended organizational changes in efforts to streamline staffing needs and improve overall efficiency
in delivery of services. On June 17, 2014, the City Council held the first of two (2) Council meetings to discuss the FY 15 City Manager's Proposed City Budget. City staff presented
on the following: • FY 14 General Fund Year-End Performance • FY 14 Year-End Budget Adjustments • FY 15 Fiscal Issues and Challenges • Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee Recommendations
for the Following Departments: o Human Resources o Public Safety o Public Works o Recreation & Community Services o Finance & Administration o Public Relations o Community Development
o Successor Agency • Other FY 15 Proposed Budget Recommendations • Revenue Enhancements At the first budget meeting, the City Council had several concerns with regard to the proposed
organizational changes and did not take any action. Specifically, Council asked the Human Resources Department to review all proposed position changes and for the Finance Director to
verify the fiscal impacts of the proposed organizational changes. 2
Further, Council directed that all departments be brought back for consideration at the June 24, 2014 meeting. At this meeting, City Council will be asked to approve year-end budget
adjustments to the FY 14 Adjusted Budget and receive presentations for all departments presented at the June 1 ih Budget Meeting, as well as presentations from the following departments
that were not presented: o City Manager o City Clerk o City Treasurer o Development Services The City Council will also receive a detailed presentation on the FY 15 City Manager's Proposed
City Budget. (FIN) Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council and Successor Agency reopen a public hearing, receive a presentation on the proposed Fiscal Year 2014-15 (FY
15) Budget, accept public comments, close the public hearing, and each adopt the respective attached resolutions entitled: o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO AMEND Tl:iE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 ADJUSTED BUDGET o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR
2014-15 BUDGET WITH APPROPRIATE CLASSIFICATION/POSITION CHANGES o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-15
SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUDGET o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE PROPOSED FEE REVISIONS AND ADOPTING THE FY 2014-15 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE o A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XI liB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION CLOSED SESSION NONE
3
ADJOURNMENT CITY OF LYNWOOD AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS WILL BE POSTED AS NEEDED. THE NEXT MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL,
11330 BULLIS ROAD, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. 4
AGENDA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: APPROVED BY: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Recommendation: June 24, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Honorable Mayor and Members of the City
Council as the Successor Agency of the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency Sarah Magana Withers, City Manag~ Steven Avalos, Administrative Analyst II~ Amanda Roberson, Director of Finance CIIY~
Delania Whitaker, Administrative Analyst II\ Adoption of the FY 2014-15 Budget Staff recommends that the City Council and Successor Agency reopen a public hearing, receive a presentation
on the proposed Fiscal Year 2014-15 (FY 15) Budget, accept public comments, close the public hearing, and each adopt the respective attached resolutions entitled: • A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 ADJUSTED BUDGET • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 BUDGET WITH APPROPRIATE CLASSIFICATION/POSITION CHANGES • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LYNWOOD
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUDGET • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE PROPOSED FEE REVISIONS AND ADOPTING
THE FY 2014-15 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ~A..;,:G:::,E,..,N=-DA~ ITEM j_
Background: In April 2014, the City Council established several City subcommittees to strategically plan and address key Citywide areas of concern, one of which is the Reorganization/Budget
Subcommittee. The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee was established to review the existing City organizational structure, identify Council budget priorities, and also to make budget
recommendations during the budget process. The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee met with all departments, received their proposed budgets, and made subsequent budget recommendations
and recommended organizational changes in efforts to streamline staffing needs and improve overall efficiency in delivery of services. On June 17, 2014, the City Council held the first
of two (2) Council meetings to discuss the FY 15 City Manager's Proposed City Budget. City staff presented on the following: • FY 14 General Fund Year-End Performance • FY 14 Year-End
Budget Adjustments • FY 15 Fiscal Issues and Challenges • Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee Recommendations for the Following Departments: o Human Resources o Public Safety o Public
Works o Recreation & Community Services o Finance & Administration o Public Relations o Community Development o Successor Agency • Other FY 15 Proposed Budget Recommendations • Revenue
Enhancements At the first budget meeting, the City Council had several concerns with regard to the proposed organizational changes and did not take any action. Specifically, Council
asked the Human Resources Department to review all proposed position changes and for the Finance Director to verify the fiscal impacts of the proposed organizational changes. Further,
Council directed that all departments be brought back for consideration at the June 24, 2014 meeting. At this meeting, City Council will be asked to approve year-end budget adjustments
to the FY 14 Adjusted Budget and receive presentations for all departments presented at the June 171h Budget Meeting, as well as presentations from the following departments that were
not presented: • • City Manager • City Clerk • City Treasurer 2
• Development Services The City Council will also receive a detailed presentation on the FY 15 City Manager's Proposed City Budget. Discussion & Analysis: FY 14 Year-End Budget Adjustments:
1. Waste Hauler Related Revenues and Expenditures: Due to the creation of the new Refuse Fund in November 2013, the City began recording all waste hauler specific revenues (Waste Collection,
Franchise Fees, and Rubbish Admin Fees) and Sanitation Division expenditures (i.e. CDS/WRI Contract, salaries and benefits) in the new Refuse Fund. From July 2013 to October 2013, these
revenues and expenditures were recorded in the General Fund. The Sanitation Division budget and waste hauler revenues historically have been recorded in the General Fund and were included
in the FY 14 Adopted General Fund Budget. Therefore, the following budget adjustments are needed to properly account for the transfer of waste hauling revenues and expenditures from
the General Fund to the Refuse Fund: • Revenues -Transfer Refuse Collection Franchise Franchise Fees, Residential Waste Collection Fees, and Rubbish Administrative Fees revenues: a.
Budgeted Revenues -$3.060.000 b. Actual Recorded Revenues -$980.955 • Expenditures -Transfer Sanitation Division expenditures (i.e. CDS/WRI Contract, salaries and benefits) and other
waste hauling expenditures (i.e. CDS Forensic Audit): a. Budgeted Expenditures-$2.347.746 b. Actual Recorded Expenditures-$691.203 2. General Fund Subsidy to Support Citywide Services:
Franchise Fees and Administrative Fees associated with the waste hauler contract are generally reserved for General City purposes and uses (and are not necessarily reserved for specific
waste hauler operations). Since these vital revenue sources are no longer received in the General Fund, to maintain sufficient funding levels in the General Fund and support Citywide
services provided to residents, staff recommends a Transfer In from the Refuse Fund to the General Fund in the amount of $919.751. Staff also recommends that Council approve additional
budget adjustments attached as Exhibit A. 3
If the above budget adjustments are adopted, the City's projected ending General Fund balance for FY 14 will be $4.8 million. If these budget adjustments are not approved, the City will
end FY 14 with a $3.9 million General Fund balance and be at high risk of falling below the City's minimum reserve level by the end of FY 15. The City's minimum reserve level policy
is 10% of the City's Operating Budget, which is projected to be $2.7 million for FY 15. Although technically the $3.9 million General Fund balance is unrestricted, the balance should
not fall below the $2.7 minimum General Fund balance level. 4
FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget Overview Citywide Funds The FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget was developed in the context of a steady economy with flat revenue growth offset by
rising operating costs for the General Fund. Property Tax and Sales Tax are expected to see slight declines in FY 15, while Utility Users Tax (UUT) revenues will increase to offset this
revenue shortfall. The FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget also focuses on meeting the Council's reserve policies for the General Fund, Garage Fund, and Water Enterprise Fund, as well
as the Contingency Set Aside policy. The Citywide expenditure budget, including transfers between funds, and excluding the Successor Agency, totals $123 million and is funded by $102.6
million in revenues and the use of $20.4 million of available reserves, including bond proceeds for capital projects. The Citywide budget includes all funds and programs, such as the
Water Enterprise Fund, HUD Funds, Street Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts, and the General Fund. TABLE 1 FY 15 PROPOSED BUDGET-ALL CITY FUNDS FY 14 FY 14 FY 15
Adopted Adopted City Manager Budget Proposed Budget (Less Refuse) Budget Revenues General Fund $28,836,298 $25,776,328 $26,416,767 Water Fund 10,042,890 8,642,890 8,942,890 Refuse Fund
-3,060,000 3,415,552 Sewer Fund -1,400,000 1,400,000 Capital Improvement Projects 22,146,055 22,146,055 27,566,868 Other Funds 34 006 179 34 006 179 34 885 621 Total Revenues $95,031,422
$95,031,422 $102,627,698 Expenditures General Fund $29,092,072 $26,963,975 $27,278,373 Water Fund 10,854,749 9,741,045 11,925,415 Refuse Fund -2,128,097 3,302,445 Sewer Fund -1,113,704
2,308,646 Capital Improvement Projects 22,160,314 22,160,314 27,566,868 Other Funds 42 149 170 42 149 170 50 609 346 Total Expenditures $104,256,305 $104,256,305 $122,991,093 Use of
Reserves $9,224,883 $9,224,883 $20,363,395 5
This report primarily focuses on the General Fund since this is the fund that supports traditional municipal services the City provides for residents, such as law enforcement, fire protection,
public works services, parks, and recreation. General Fund The FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget contains recommended actions that increase overall General Fund expenditures by 1.2%
(or $314K) from the FY 14 Adopted Budget, excluding waste hauling revenues and expenditures. FY 15 City Manager Proposed General Fund expenditures in the amount of $27.3 million are
offset by $26.4 million in projected revenues and $0.9 million in reserves. The budget includes transfers out for debt service payments. Based on the projected revenues and proposed
expenditures, it is anticipated that the General Fund will end FY 15 with $3.9 million in reserves. 6
TABLE 2 FY 15 CITY MANAGER PROPOSED GENERAL FUND BUDGET FY 14 FY 14 FY 15 AdFoYp 1t4e d ABduodpgteedt Year-End City Manager Budget R(eLfeussse ) (UEnstaiumdaitteesd ) PBroupdogseetd
Revenues Property Tax $8,809,736 $8,809,736 $8,376,739 $8,396,348 Sales Tax 3,935,442 3,935,442 3,834,847 3,803,825 Utility Users Tax 5,166,519 5,166,519 5,635,927 5,477,460 Franchise
Fees 1 '196,000 576,000 640,664 640,656 Business License & Other Tax 874,750 874,750 943,475 874,750 Charges for Current Services 3,228,950 1,088,980 1,511,945 1 '187,450 Fines, Forfeits,
& Penalties 1,582,000 1,582,000 1,371,388 1,582,000 Other Revenues 2,084,051 1,784,051 2,036,152 1,720,428 Transfers In 1 958 850 1 958 850 4 470 800 2 733 850 Total Revenues $28,836,298
$25,776,328 $28,821,937 $26,416,767 Exoenditures Salaries & Benefits $7,614,709 $7,574,112 $7,693,974 $7,567,870 Public Safety 14,001,513 14,001,513 14,440,073 14,918,450 Other Operational
Expenditures 5,853,020 3,765,520 3,844,719 3,840,576 Transfers Out (Eliminate Deficit Funds)' 884,958 884,958 3,312,499 -Transfers Out (Debt Service l 721,394 721,394 721,394 715,972
Transfers Out (Landscape Fund OperatinQ Deficit) ---131,505 Transfers Out (Self-Insurance Fund/Litigation) ---104,000 Transfers Out (Contingency) 16 478 16 478 48 675 -Total Expenditures
$29,092,072 $26,963,975 $30,061 ,334 $27,278,373 Use of (Reserves)/Surplus ($255,774) ($1 '187,647) ($1,239,397) ($861,606) Beginning Fund Balance $5,988,040 $5,988,040 $5,988,040 $4,748,643
Ending Fund Balance $5,732,266 $4,800,393 $4,748,643 $3,887,037 1 One-Time Transfer Out to eliminate cumulative deficit funds. 7
Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee In April 2014, the City Council established several City subcommittees to strategically plan and address key Citywide areas of concern, one of which
is the Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee. The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee was established to review the existing City organizational structure, identify Council budget priorities,
and also to make budget recommendations during the budget process. All Department Heads were required to meet with the Budget Subcommittee to review their operations and to propose any
necessary adjustments to improve overall efficiency and service levels. The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee met with all departments and approved their proposed budgets. The Reorganization/Budget
Subcommittee made budget recommendations and recommended several organizational changes for each department in order to streamline staffing needs and improve overall efficiency in delivery
of services. A summary of the major recommended changes are listed below: • New Community Development Department -Due to the vacancy left with the promotion of the former Director of
Community Development to the City Manager, it was determined that merging the Public Relations and Community Development Departments would be beneficial to the City by cost reductions
from consolidating the two Director positions while maintaining the same level of service. A portion of the Director of Community Development's salary will also be absorbed by the Successor
Agency which in turn will constitute General Fund spending reductions. The Public Relations Department (with the exception of the Marketing and Public Information Divisions) will be
consolidated with the existing Community Development Department, which includes the Business License Division, to form a new Community Development Department. The Director of Public
Relations will become the new Director of Community Development and oversee operations. • New Technology and Media Support Services Department -The Marketing, Public Information, and
Information Technology (IT) Services Divisions will be consolidated to form a new department called Technology and Media Support Services. The formation of this new department will augment
the role of IT to streamline and improve the marketing and branding of the City to advertise City services and events, and generate more revenue where possible. In addition, this new
department will provide Citywide support services for all departments for all their IT support and marketing needs. • Community Events Budget -The Reorganization/Budget Subcommittee
is proposing to restore the Community Events Budget of $154K for all Citywide events. However, in FY 15, the City will partner with the Greater New Lynwood Chamber of Commerce and re-direct
these resources to the Chamber, who will assume the direct management and planning of certain Citywide events. Of the $154K Community Events Budget, $72,500 will be given to the Chamber
in FY 14, which is included in Exhibit A. 8
This will create much-needed savings in staffing and operational costs, as well as allow the Chamber to fundraise and enhance these great events for the community. There will be no fiscal
impact to the General Fund, as the Community Events Budget will be budgeted in the Refuse Fund. The Special Events Subcommittee will meet to establish an agreement to designate how the
funds will be spent and identify reporting requirements. • City Clerk/City Treasurer -As the City Clerk and City Treasurer are part-time elected officials, all City Clerk and City Treasurer
staff will be under the oversight of the City Manager's Office to improve the day-to-day efficiency of operations in these departments. The municipal code will be amended to clarify
reporting functions, which will be presented at a later Council meeting. All other proposed department reorganizations and fiscal impacts are listed in more detail in Exhibit B. These
remaining department's (Community Development, City Clerk, City Treasurer, City Manager, and Development Services) proposed budgets will be presented today, along with the previous presented
departments, and staff is recommending Council take action and approve each department's proposed budget. The total General Fund fiscal impact for all department proposals' presented
will result in savings in the amount of $23K. Human Resources Review of Proposed Reorganization Changes Following the first budget meeting, staff met with Human Resources (HR) to review
all proposed reorganization changes and to properly classify each position change in accordance with all personnel regulations and meet and confer requirements. The HR Director indicated
that the time needed to properly review all proposed reclassifications with requested job titles, and position additions and deletions, would exceed the budget adoption dates. However,
the HR Director recommended the following approval process for all proposed position changes and department reorganizations: 1) City Council should approve or not approve each proposed
proposed position change as presented in the budget presentation; 2) City Council can make alternative recommendations to any proposed position change presented; 3) The Human Resources
Department will review all approved position changes following the budget adoption meetings, and validate and/or make recommendations for proper position titles and pay bands for all
approved position changes; 4) In addition to Council approval AND Human Resources review and approval, all approved position changes must go before and be approved by the Personnel Board
and further, must be subject to all personnel rules and procedures, and meet and confer requirements. All position changes approved by Council will not take effect until the pending
review and approval by the HR Department AND Personnel Commission. These approved changes are also subject to all Union Meet and Confer requirements. 9
The FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget. will include all proposed organizational changes. Should any approved position change be overturned by HR or Personnel Commission, the budget
will be adjusted accordingly during the FY 15 Mid-Year Financial Review. Fiscal Impact of Proposed Reorganizations & Methodology The Finance & Administration Department has reviewed
all Department proposed reorganizations and has correctly verified all fiscal impacts associated with each department's proposed position changes. The fiscal impact for each department
as presented in Exhibit B represents the true fiscal impact of net positions added/deleted/reclassified as it increases or decreases the General Fund. The itemized analysis of all position
changes is also included in Exhibit B, with a general overview of the methodology to determine the fiscal impact is summarized below: • All proposed position changes are inclusive of
the FY 15 approved MOU agreement salary increases • All proposed position changes are calculated based on the FY 15 benefit rates • Reclassifications -The fiscal impact for all proposed
reclassifications is the net difference in pay (including benefits) between the new proposed position/job title and the current position/job title • Additions/Deletions -The fiscal impact
for all proposed additions/deletions is the net difference in pay (including benefits) between the positions added and positions deleted • Operational Savings -Any proposed operational
savings will also be included and added to the net fiscal impact for all proposed position changes All proposed shifts of divisions to and from departments do not net a fiscal impact
because there is no net increase/decrease for the General Fund. These reorganizational proposals are listed as a i.Q. fiscal impact in each department's reorganization summary in Exhibit
B. Other FY 15 Proposed Budget Recommendations The FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget is the fourth year of a multi-year approach addressing the fiscal issues and challenges listed above.
The FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget recommends the following actions: 1) Increase rates charged to departments to cover the annual cost of programs included in the Self-Insurance
Fund to prevent subsidies from the General Fund. 2) Continue to cost-allocate contracts and Citywide services to all departments to reflect true costs of services and shift costs to
other applicable funds, providing relief and savings in the General Fund where possible (i.e. insurance premiums, security contract). 3) Continue to monitor spending in prior deficit
funds. City staff noted that there is an ongoing structural deficit in the Landscape Maintenance Assessment Fund as 10
projected expenditures exceed revenues. A General Fund subsidy is required for this fund. 4) In order to maintain adequate funding levels in the General Fund and support Citywide services
provided to residents, staff recommends a Transfer In from the Refuse Fund to the General Fund in the amount of $BOOK in FY 15. 5) Properly budget for Citywide legal and litigation costs
by: maintaining a sufficient legal services budget, reflecting true legal costs in the appropriate departments, and shifting claim-related legal costs to the Self Insurance Fund. 6)
Satisfy the General Fund reserve requirements. The City must continue to be conservative and manage its fiscal affairs in an appropriate manner. The road to long-term financial and operational
stability requires leadership, commitment, planning, and effective execution as well as a thriving national and local economy. As stewards of public funds and provider of services to
the Lynwood community, the most favorable financial outcome for the City is financial resiliency to ensure that the City can continue to provide services to the community and meet its
mandates. Revenue Enhancements Since FY 10, property and sales tax revenues have increased by a combined 5.3% (or $612K). During that time, UUT revenues have decreased by 6.8% (or $401
K). Revenue increases in property and sales taxes have been offset by declining UUT revenues, which have resulted in flat revenues. The lack of general growth in revenues has deepened
the use of the City's reserves to stabilize the City's operations. While efforts to close the budget gap have traditionally focused on budget cuts, staff recommends that Council consider
increasing revenues and maximizing revenue recovery. City staff recommends consideration of the following revenue enhancements and/or new fees: • Graduated Fines for Repeat Property
Nuisance Abatements • Dog Feces Fine • Off Leash Dog Fine • Improve Enforcement of Existing Codes and Recovery of Unpaid Fines • New Utility Late Payment Fee -Implement and enforce new
fee for delinquent payment of utility bills • City Branding & Marketing Fees -Explore new avenues and improve branding and advertising opportunities, such as in cell phone towers, bus
shelters, billboards, etc. All new fees and revenue enhancement ideas are listed in more detail for Council approval in Exhibit C. In addition to flat revenue growth, unavoidable operational
increases continue to surpass Citywide budget reductions annually and deplete the City's use of reserves. Over the last six (6) fiscal years, Public Safety contracts increased by an
average of $307K per year, while service levels remained the same. CaiPERS retirement costs and health premiums are also unavoidable costs thatcontinue to increase. In order to 11
contend with these unavoidable operational increases, the City Council may want to consider a sales tax increase to support increased operations costs and avoid largescale cuts to vital
services we provide to our community in future fiscal years. Key Legislation City staff has also identified pending legislation that could have a significant fiscal impact on City. Legislation
includes the following: • AB 1717 Prepaid Wireless -Would allow City to collect UUT on prepaid wireless services. • AB 2493 Redevelopment Bonds -Would allow City to use 2011 redevelopment
bond proceeds in the amount of $20.3 million. • Pension Tax Legislation -Would allow the City to collect an additional $BOOK annually in retirement tax revenues. Fiscal Impact: If City
Council elects to adopt the FY 15 City Manager Proposed Budget, the projected fund balance would be $3.9 million at the end of FY 15. Coordinated With: City Attorney All Departments
Attachments: Resolutions Exhibit A-FY 2013-14 Year-End Budget Adjustments Exhibit B-Summary of FY 2014-15 Proposed Reorganizations Exhibit C-Summary of FY 2014-15 Proposed Fee Changes
Exhibit D-FY 2014-15 Appropriations Limit Calculation Exhibit E-FY 2014-15 Proposed Successor Agency Budget FY 2014-15 City Manager Proposed Budget Presentation 12
RESOLUTION NO., ____ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 YEAR-END BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 ADJUSTED
BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lynwood (the "City Council") adopted the City of Lynwood's
Fiscal Year 2013-2014 (FY 14) Operating Budget on June 4, 2013;and WHEREAS, the City's adopted budget is based on certain assumptions and meeting expenditure and revenue projections
at the time of budget adoption and yearend revenue and expenditure performance are summarized at the subsequent fiscal year's budget adoption meeting; and WHEREAS, during the year, unanticipated
services, significant fiscal issues, or emergencies may arise that may impact the adopted budget and projected financial forecasts; and WHEREAS, beginning in November 2013, the City
began recording all waste hauling related revenues and expenditures in a new Refuse Fund, which have been historically recorded in the General Fund and as such, will significantly impact
the General Fund and year-end projections; and WHEREAS, due to the creation of the new Refuse Fund, budget adjustments are needed to transfer adopted waste hauling revenues and expenditures
from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund; and WHEREAS, further, since vital revenue sources are no longer received in the General Fund, to maintain sufficient funding levels in the General
Fund and support Citywide services provided to residents, staff recommends a Transfer In from the Refuse Fund to the General Fund; and WHEREAS, staff is also recommending the following
proposed budget adjustments, hereto attached as Exhibit A, which will amend the FY 14 Adjusted Budget. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND
DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. By adoption of this resolution, the City Council approves the FY 14 Proposed Year-End Budget Adjustments, hereto attached as Schedule A, and hereby amends
the FY 14 Adopted Budget. All actions covered by this resolution shall be carried out in the ordinary course of business consistent with the current ordinances, resolutions and Personnel
Rules and Regulations of the City to the extent that the same apply to the contemplated actions.
Section 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or Designee, to make the necessary budget adjustments to the City's financial system to reflect appropriate changes to the FY
14 Adjusted Budget. Section 3. This resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption. Section 4. This City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 241h day of June, 2014. ATTEST: Maria Quinonez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David A. Garcia City Attorney 2 Aide Castro Mayor Sarah Magana-Withers City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Amanda Roberson Finance Director
Budget Adjustment 1 Refuse Collection Franchise Fee Revenues -Budgeted 2 Refuse Collection Franchise Fee Revenues -Actuals 3 Rubbish Administrative Revenues-Budgeted 4 Rubbish Administrative
Revenues -Actuals 5 Waste Collection Revenues -Budgeted 6 Waste Collection Revenues-Actuals 7 Waste Hauler Contract & Administration Expenditures-Budgeted 8 Waste Hauler Contract & Administration
Expenditures -Actuals 9 Sewer Services Revenues -Budgeted $ $ $ $ $ $ City of Lynwood -Exhibit A FY 14 Proposed Year-End Budget Adjustments Amount From To (Account) (Account) 620,000
General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 195,890 General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 300,000 General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 130,497 General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 2,140,000 General
Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 654,567 General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 $ 2,349,245 General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 $ 691,203 General Fund Refuse Fund 1011 1052 $ 1,400,000 Water Fund
Sewer Fund 6051 6401 Justification To properly account for the transfer of budgeted waste hauling revenues from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer
of actual waste hauling revenues recorded from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer of budgeted waste hauling revenues from the General Fund to the
Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer of actual waste hauling revenues recorded from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer of budgeted waste
hauling revenues from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer of actual waste hauling revenues recorded from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly
account for the transfer of budgeted waste hauling expenditures from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer of actual waste hauling expenditures recorded
from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund To properly account for the transfer of budgeted sewer services and sewer-related capital outlay revenues from the Water Fund to the new Sewer
Fund
Budget Adjustment Amount From To (Account) (Account) Justification 10 Sewer Services Revenues -Actuals $ 425,054 Water Fund Sewer Fund To properly account for the transfer of actual
6051 6401 sewer services and sewer-related capital outlay revenues recorded from the Water Fund to the new Sewer Fund 11 Sewer Services Expenditures -$ 1,235,963 Water Fund Sewer Fund
To properly account for the transfer of Budgeted 6051 6401 budgeted sewer services and sewer-related capital outlay expenditures from the Water Fund to the new Sewer Fund 12 Sewer Services
Expenditures-$ 651,332 Water Fund Sewer Fund To property account for the transfer of actual Actuals 6051 6401 sewer services and sewer-related capital outlay expenditures recorded from
the Water Fund to the new Sewer Fund 13 One-time Transfer In of sewer $ 1,200,000 Water Fund Sewer Fund In order to give the new Sewer Fund a revenues from the Water Fund Reserves 6401
healthy reserve level to address increased reserves to give the Sewer Fund a 6051 operating costs, sewer capital outlay, and healthy reserve level to support unanticipated costs that
may arise during the increased sewer services operations fiscal year, staff is recommending a one-time and sewer-related capital outlay for transfer of $1.2 million from the Water Fund
FY 15 reserves to the Sewer Fund reserves in FY 14. $1.2 million represents approximately one fiscal year of adopted sewer revenues, in which one year of sewer revenues is recommended
to maintain a healthy fund balance and not deplete reserves in the Water Fund. 14 Transfer In from the Refuse Fund to $ 919,751 Refuse Fund General Fund Redirect general purpose Franchise
and restore the General Fund and Reserves 1011 Administrative Fee revenues to the General support Citywide services provided 1052 Fund in order to maintain sufficient funding to residents
levels in the General Fund and support Citywide services provided to residents 15 Transfer In from the General Fund $ 32,197 General Fund Contingency Fund To replenish the Contigency
Fund to maintain to replenish the Contigency Fund to Reserves 1051 the required $500K minimum reserve level maintain the required $500K 1011 minimum reserve level 16 Transfer In from
General Fund to $ 156 General Fund JAG Fund To eliminate structural deficit in JAG Fund Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Reserves 3801 Fund to eliminate structural deficit in 1011 special
grant fund
From To Budget Adjustment ,Amount (Account) (Account) 17 Allocate Community Events Budgef $ 72,500 Refuse Fund Refuse Fund to the Greater New Lynwood Reserves 1052 Chamber of Commerce
(Pending 1052 Special Events Subcommittee Approval and Council Approved Contract) 18 Shift anticipated year-end savings $ 157,640 Fire Suppression Law Enforcement from the Fire Suppression
Services Services Division Division Division to the Law Enforcement (General Fund) (General Fund) Division to pay for suplemental law 1011 1011 enforcement services (i.e. helicopter,
City Council meetings, prisoner maintenance, cruising/reckless driving, and loud noise enforcement services). Note: In November 2013, City staff began recording waste hauling and sewer
revenues and expenditures into two (2) new funds: Refuse Fund and Sewer Fund. Justification To allocate resources to the Chamber, who will assume the direct management and planning of
certain Citywide events, creating much-needed savings in staffing and operational costs, as well as allow the Chamber to fundraise and enhance events for the community To utilize and
transfer year-end savings from Fire Suppression Services to pay for anticpated year-end costs the City will incur for supplemental law enforcement services
RESOLUTION NO. ____ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2014·2015 BUDGET WITH APPROPRIATE CLASSIFICATION/POSITION CHANGES WHEREAS, the
City Council of the City of Lynwood (the "City Council") reviewed the City Manager's FY 2014-2015 Proposed Budget for the City of Lynwood attached herein and made a part of this resolution
through this reference; and WHEREAS, the City satisfied the General Fund and Water Enterprise Fund Reserve requirements and anticipate the following ending fund balances for FY 2014-2015:
$3.9 million for the General Fund and $10.4 million for the Water Enterprise Fund; and WHEREAS, the agenda for the June 24, 2014 meeting of the City Council was duly posted, and the
City Manager's FY 2014-15 Proposed Budget and all related agenda material were made available to the interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Lynwood Budget for Fiscal Year 2014-2014-15 is hereby adopted as presented in the City Manager's FY 2014-15 Proposed Budget.
All actions covered by this resolution shall be carried out in the ordinary course of business consistent with the current ordinances, resolutions and Personnel Rules and Regulations
of the City to the extent that the same apply to the complemented actions. Section 2. The Fiscal Year 2014-15 Budget is hereby amended by adding, deleting, reclassifying, and/or transferring
the classifications/positions and their funding as detailed on Exhibit B-Summary of FY 2014-15 Reorganizations. City departments reorganized in order to streamline staffing needs and
improve overall efficiency in delivery of services, which include the following transfers from one department to another, and the formation of new departments, as detailed on Exhibit
B -Summary of FY 2014-15 Reorganizations. Section 3. That the reclassification and deletion of filled positions may be subject to meet and confer obligations with the employee bargaining
units and that the City Manager or her designee is authorized to adjust the adopted budget to comply with the terms of existing employee agreements approved by the City Council. Section
4. That the City Manager or her designee is authorized to carry over incomplete Capital Improvement Projects with remaining account balances and available funding sources from the prior
fiscal year, to allow the work in progress relative to these projects to continue in an uninterrupted manner contingent upon revenues being available.
Section 5. The City Manager or her designee is authorized to approve any transfer between accounts provided that they are within the same department and the same fund. Section 6. This
resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of June 2014 ATTEST: Maria Quinonez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David Garcia
City Attorney 2 Aide Castro Mayor Sarah Magana Withers City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Amanda Roberson Director of Finance
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. g, 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. City of Lynwood Exhibit B FY 15 Proposed Department Reorganizations 1 Action General Other Justification Fund Funds Impact Impact & & i i
' W"""""'OJ $13,097 $8,732 ~~"; 1 1 other : IAL posmon \od~:i~:lin e .. ~of r ~ayroll i li :;a~a~rade from G-36 to G-45; -o po:ition to revise job.' 1to reflect actual Remove Project
Coordinator I duties. i · I duties, and to increase loav band from G-361o G-45 i > {2) Financial i' 13,802 3,561 I I duties IAnalvsts I Add Lead Account Clerk !Water li ' -70,455 INEW
· >handle' <dutiessuchasbillin9; "~"'"', customer account posting errors; I ~.~.~olv.in~ cu_stomer complaints; daily cash balancing; and ~ lfillinoinfor i rwhe~ Delete Account Clerk
li i -(72,461 ' ' 1 of the I li 1 Billing Division ~~hift I •' Me~la :~~~-Division to new --' 1 for ~·:low 1 and Media Support i .n ; in' I Budget IAII i i (6g,748) >; ,248 jTo' fset
; in salaries and benefits Total Finance & , $37,535 1 Delete Vacant I till I Services ITo improve i 1 of the Human: Inter~"'· ' Vacant Office ' t II to r Service !General Services {54,647)
1g,175 1 ~terns will I ' I r for City Ha." Lobby Front-!Desk ' ' di~ .~ \ receJVmg/sortrng I mail. i 'oene;al !Add C· "'"' t Analyst I Services 84,249 56,166 1 :~;ssis~~rector of H~';;,~~ters
; & Risk jAdd Risk Manager I liability ~~~:~:~:Director o> 7~~~:s ; & Risk ·atal Human --01 1 Delete Deputy Director of I Sports & Leisure §Q ITO' .. ,. ; in .,. i I structure of the
$0 I Add Office. II i $~ $Q ITo suipo~-~ ~as_h 1 1 ~~ithep~~~=~ures; mini~i;;\i~~=~::~m; lothei-during peak program and facility usage I seasons $0 I Add Office, Ill jSeniors ~ !Q jTopr~vide'
I i tto the: rand assist fwiui planning Senior trips, classes, activities and programs ~ $0 I Delete uouu• .,,,., i 'Hall $0 jTo sup pan funding of 'new' Facitity & Program: i
Proposed Action 16. Add Facility & Program Supervisor 17. Add Facility & Program Supervisor 18. Add Recreation Coordinator 19. Add Recreation Coordinator 20. Add Recreation Coordinator
21. Delete Recreation S ecialist Part-Time 22. Delete Recreation Specialist (Part-Time, Vacant) 23. Delete (3) Recreation Specialists (Part-Time) 24. Add (2) Laborers 25. Delete Laborer
(Part-Time) 26. Delete Laborer (Part-Time) 27. Add Senior Lifeguard Part-Time 28. Delete Senior Lifeguard (Part-Time PERS) 29. Add (2) Lifeguards (Part-Time) 30. Add (6) Recreation Leaders
(Part-Time) City of Lynwood Exhibit B FY 15 Proposed Department Reorganizations General other Justification Fund Funds Impact Impact (Salaries & (Salaries & Benefits) Benefits) Bateman
Hall 96,624 -To reflect the need for full-time supervision of Bateman Hall. Currently, the Block Watch Coordinator is responsible for overseeing the operations of Bateman Hall. Sports
& Leisure 96,624 -To manage the personnel and workload of the Division. Staff will be dedicated to the functions of the Lynwood Sports Association and the joint use of park space with
LUSD; supporting park maintenance operations; and increasing articioation in adult oroqrams. Subtotal: $97,986 $0 Sports & Leisure $63,082 $0 To assist with the supervision of all subordinate
staff and to support the operations of the Sports Division which includes administrative duties for all youth sports leagues including budgeting, equipment purchases, program marketing,
and coordination of field use and maintenance Natatorium 63,082 -To manage the personnel and workload of the Division, comply with Health Department standards and safety requirements,
and to focus on increasing participation in adult orca ram Youth Center 63,082 -To manage contract services for special interest classes and to assist in the operation of the after-school
program at the Youth Center and Yvonne-Burke Ham Park Subtotal: $189,246 $0 Administration $22,330 $0 To support fundinq of 'new' Office Assistant I position Parks & Playground (17,551)
-To support funding of 'new' Recreation Coordinator position Sports & Leisure (72,363) -To support funding of 'new' Facility and Program Supervisor 1position Subtotal: ($112,244 $0 Bateman
Hall $101,190 $0 To reflect the need to provide full-time staff to assist in the operation and maintenance of Bateman Hall Bateman Hall (42,211 -To support funding of 2 'new' full-time
Laborer positions Seniors (22,106 -To support funding of 'new' Office Assistant I position Subtotal: $36,873 $0 Natatorium $14,275 $0 To assist in su ervisin swim ro rams Natatorium
(41,539) -To support funding of 'new' Recreation Coordinator position Natatorium 11,325 -To support staffing needs of swim programs Subtotal: $15,939 $0 Parks & Playground $22,160 $0
To reflect staffing needs of the summer day camp program and the expansion of the Summer Food Service Program, which is offered at 3 sites (Youth Center, Yvonne Burke-Ham Park and Medina
Park)
City of Lynwood Exhibit B FY 15 Proposed Department Reorganizations -· I Action General Other i i Fund Funds Impact Impact (Salaries & (Salaries & 131. I Add (3) I 1 Leaders'"""-"'""'
Parks & I I ,.. --~~~~:;~;: t 1-To assist with the ~ummer Food Service 1 , P.rk; the 132 I Delete (3) i 'Leaders' , 2 Vacant) Sports & Leisure (14,623) -ITor i .. ; of 'new' ' r position
33. Delete (2) I 1 Leaders ("an-"me, 1 Vacant) 'Hall (20,082) -ITo ~upp~_rt_tunding of 2 I . ' Laborer ' To I and Citv functions use of the facility for private events 34. 1 Delete Recreation
Leader Natatorium (2,482) -1;,~: 1 of the pool and use funding for 'new' ord position . 35. !Delete (2) i r Leaders 1 !Seniors (11,151 ITo support ; f'new' I i t I position I $0 136.
!Transfer, 1 to Public Works I Sports & Leisure $Q $Q ITo improve I 1 ofthe I .... Division I $0 $0 37. Restore' i 1 Events Budget i 1 Events $Q ITo i I events $0 Total ' 1 & i ~R"re'"'"'
1 (NRPAI Outot ~ , Public i , and I li '~'."~. . _T• , & P~blic IAII Divisions I$ -I$ -' ' (IT~ Services Divisions will be consolidated into , o. il : n; to form ''"w &Media I:~.~~~
to augment the role of IT to streamline and ·~-~);:!-'and branding of the City to advertise I ; I i i i and ev'ents, and generate more revenue where i r of I I i 84,740 i I. ; this new
department will provide 41. Delete Graphics Intern (I ,, i (13,367: lcttywide services for all departments for all their IT ~ --Pz'~Works ; o• '"'"'"'' i ; staff to the General !All
Divisions $92,882 I$ -I!~ 'pr~~~dser~~~~~b~ti~n of su;:~:~~~ ~~~=~~:i~il~~e5se~~ces ~und ~o more' I 1 duties and I I functions 1better management 43. nanster in of (2) ' ; ;from !Building
...:_ -TotaiPubli-~$ .
144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. -----------------------------------------------City of Lynwood Exhibit B FY 15 Proposed Department Reorganizations l Act; on General other i Fund Funds
Impact Impact (Salaries & (Salaries & I !Shift Public I 1 and Par~i~g Services Public.l $ -I$ -See justification below in i., Development section. I Divisions to existing Community Development
Department I i :•• Ito form ne~, consolidated Community Development Parking Services 1 Shift I i 1 Division & Public i 1 Divisions lo ... --See: , for new -.. I Media Support I new Technology
and Media Support Services Department Department above. -$0 $0 li ' Pub.": I t,Cwith ' All Divisions $ -1$ -Due to the vacancy lett with the 1 of the former loti '"''ol"~_and Public
Information Divisions) with existing ~as' i.7 Development to the City Manager, it Development Department to form a new merging the Public Relations and Development Department .1.1 Development
Departments would be beneficia! to the i cost reductions from consolidating the two 1 Director of Public Relations to Director of i (103,207) 120,408 Dire~t~r positions while maintaining
the same level of .. , Development :_ervi~e. A portion of the Director of Community ~·.,_salary will also be absorbed by the Successor :~':.~ ::. ! in turn will constitute General Fund
spending Administrative Aide to Senior Rehab. -11,570 Due to the' ' 1 of th~.H~usi~B Division, the current .•. positl_on .... { · i has been cross trained and is now -~ul.!ill.in.g the
duties of the eliminated Senior Rehab in addition to original duties prescribed to the current position, as well as other project related duties that I fall outside of the current position's
job description 1 Project Manager to I n 0 o.,oy 13,844 The I -· services and a~~i~~~~sc~:~~~i:ovides Housing, Business License, commercial and I i I project management, Successor ~~~;:y3i
1 and administration, and among other environmental clean·up efforts for City for supported projects. The Division has one address these services and is currently working ~ui'~"'cl~~;
1o perform such duties. The proposed position of i Development Manager will address the need for a class that will perform duties tr~~.uired of the Division and while being responsible
for those I duties performed by Department's eliminated Deputy Housing Manager.
City of Lynwood Exhibit B FY 15 Proposed Department Reorganizations I Action General Other i i Fund Funds Impact Impact (Salaries & (Salaries & i 50. ~o~;~~~0~e~u~1 Director"' i • Services
Pay ICDBG i -7,289 To i ,1 dutiesu~-~~.e~~fc~' 1 for the HOME G~;de from to M-67 "'II a~ , will include i li Business License processes, i i all Business License applications, t and.
management of Business License staff, I management of HOME Program, staff, and I ._and ~-"'~ i offormer I affand' i 51. i i 'Aide to i i I 3,573 -lAs ,oart of. !he 1 i 1 and 1 i fthe
new i i ~. Ani~al Co~tr~l Program, thi~ individual will be I monitoring all Animal Control related I as following up on citizen requests. In ad~iti~n, . individual will be handling all
Block Watch I I I attending monthly meetings and meetings, as needed. 52. Add Minutes Clerk Pay to Office . lllfor I I Parking Services 1,091 -To assume lhe duties of the Block Watch
Minutes Clerk Minutes Duties ~ I liiiit iiili' Cil ; Office I I Office t II to Administrative Aide I $3,886 $ -duties included assisting in logging in complaints into the GovPartners
Computer System, keeping quarterly r~port~' il travel & meetings, as well as their i i expenditures, preparing a variety of and prepares the Green Memo, providing services for written
communication, assisting in i data related to the preparation of the department bud9et, and assisting in setup of City Council meetings . ~ ~:~: I City "easucerslaff and I 1 (;ilY ~lark
& --To improve, 1 ; in the City budgets • II be shifted to the City Manager's Office I CitY Treasurer rlerk'~ a11d City Treasurer's Office 'Vacant ea"-1 ime Office i Ill ICily Clerk
($18,2261 !iQ ~~e~·~r~~~;e i .. , of day-to-day operations in the City ---Office; ($. $0 Cil Clerk 56. Shift current ~i~~ f and' I I budget to the I City Clerk --~~e~~'~r~;e i I .JOT
i ; in the City ; Office ~ -$0 ~~~f~~~rrentL .. y 'Office ... f and 1 I budgetto City. , •••uoo• $Q $Q To improve' i 'of i ; in the City ; Office Total City ; Office; $0 $0 rsf1 Delete
{2) Code . Vacanti Code I To improve' i 1 of the
City of Lynwood Exhibit B FY 15 Proposed Department Reorganizations Proposed Action General Other Fund Funds Impact Impact (Salaries & (Salaries & Benefits) Benefits) Total Development
Services: $94,354 ($38,625 Total Department Proposed Reorganization a! Impacts: ($23,321) $429,765 (1) All Departments and/or Divisions that are proposed to transfer to new departments
or form new departments will (2) Other Funds that incur fiscal impacts resulting from organizational changes have healthy reserve levels and can Justification
RESOLUTION NO. ____ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE PROPOSED FEE REVISIONS AND ADOPTING THE FY 2014-15 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City of
Lynwood is a general law city under California law with a recognized mandate to preserve, protect and enhance the general health and welfare of its residents; and WHEREAS, the Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA) states: "A government should adopt policies that identify the manner in which fees and charges are set and the extent to which they cover the cost
of the service provided"; and WHEREAS, the Master Fee Schedule allows the public and the City staff to obtain a better understanding of all fees, rates, and permits charged by the City
of Lynwood; and WHEREAS, current charges are insufficient to cover all business costs associated with providing certain services; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code §66016, the
specific fees to be charged for services must be adopted by the City Council by resolution or ordinance, after providing notice and holding a public hearing; and WHEREAS, amendments
for the Master Fee Schedule were presented to City Council on June 24, 2014. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, PROCLAIM, ORDER, AND RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council approves and adopts the revisions to the City of Lynwood's Master Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit "C", and the revisions together with
the fees in the Master Fee Schedule that were already previously approved shall form the FY 2014-15 Master Fee Schedule which is hereby adopted. Section 2. That any existing fee not
specifically enumerated in the attached Exhibit "C" shall remain in effect at the current level and shall be subject to the provisions of the legislative action that placed it into effect.
Section 3. Any action adopting or increasing a fee or charge for development projects may not take effect for at least 60 days upon adoption. Section 4. All other fees that are not related
to development projects fees are effective immediately upon approval.
--------------------------------PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 241h day of June, 2014. ATTEST: Maria Quinonez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David Garcia City Attorney 2 Aide Castro
Mayor Sarah Magana Withers City Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Amanda Roberson Director of Finance
Fee Name Animal Control Miscellaneous Animal Fees 1. Dog Feces Fine 2. Off Leash Fine Finance Water Fees City of Lynwood Master Fee Schedule Exhibit C FY 15 Proposed Fee Changes FY 14
Description Adopted Fee New Fee New Fee 1. Utility Billing Late Payment Fee New Fee for Delinquent Bills Other Animal Control Fees were adopted on November 19, 2013 per Resolution No.
2013.146 FY15 Proposed Unit Fee $125.00 Violation $150.00 Violation 10% of Each Delinquent Bill Amount
RESOLUTION NO .. ____ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014·15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution states that the total annual appropriation subject to limitations of each government entity shall not exceed the appropriation
limit of such entity of government, except for prior year adjustments in the cost-of-living or personal income and population, as noted in Article XIIIB and State Statues; and WHEREAS,
pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, and section 7900 et seq. of the California Government Code, the City of Lynwood is required to set its appropriation limit for
each fiscal year by resolution, and approve appropriate inflation and population factors used in calculating the limit; and WHEREAS, the total annual appropriation subject to limitation
has been computed in accordance with provisions set forth in Article XIIIB, Government Code Section 7900 et seq. and Proposition 111; and WHEREAS, detailed documentation used in calculating
the appropriation limit for FY 2014-15 is available for review on file in the Finance and Administration Department, and a summary is provided in the attached Exhibit "D", which is incorporated
as a part of this resolution for reference. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, ORDER, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City reserves
the right to adjust or amend the appropriation limit based upon use of alternative growth factors as authorized by Proposition 111 if such changes or revisions would result in an advantageous
appropriation limit, now or in the future. Section 2. That the City of Lynwood's Appropriation Limit for FY 2014-15 is $29.242,942 as calculated under Exhibit "D". Section 3. That the
growth factors used in calculating the FY 2014-15 Appropriation Limit shall be the percentage change in California per capita income and the percentage change in population in the County
of Los Angeles. Section 4. The resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of June 2014. ATTEST: Maria Quinonez City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David Garcia City Attorney 2 Aide Castro Mayor Sarah Magana Withers City
Manager APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Amanda Roberson Director of Finance
--------------------------------APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION POPULATION YEAR CPI CHANGE%* FACTOR* FY 1986-87 BASE YEAR FY 2000-2001 (Recalculated) FY 2001-2002 (Recalculated) 7.82%
FY 2002-2003 (Recalculated) -1.27% FY 2003-2004 (Recalculated) 2.31% FY 2004-2005 (Recalculated) 3.28% FY 2005-2006 (Recalculated) 5.26% FY 2006-2007 (Recalculated) 3.96% FY 2007-2008
(Recalculated) 4.42% FY 2008-2009 (Recalculated) 4.29% FY 2009-2010 (Recalculated) 4.35% FY 2010-2011 (Recalculated) -2.54% FY 2011-2012 (Recalculated) 2.51% FY 2012-2013 3.77% FY 2013-2014
5.12% 2014-15: *Per Capita Cost of Living Change= -0.23 percent
*Population Change (Los Angeles County)= 0.78 percent Based on Population Change -County 1.63% 1.03% 0.61% 0.31% 0.35% 1.20% 1.31% 1.11% 0.53% 0.77% 0.56% 1.02% Per Capita Cost of Living
Converted to a Ratio: (0.231+1 00 = 100 Population increase Converted to a Ratio: 0.78 + 100 = 100 Calculation of Factor for FY 2013-2014: 0.9977 x 1.00780 = 1.09611 1.00480 1.04010
1.04710 1.06500 1.04700 1.05170 1.05170 1.05190 1.01530 0.98270 1.02900 1.04350 1.06192 0.99770 1.00780 1.00548 Calculation of Appropriation Limit $29,083,504 x 1.00548 = $29,242,942
(Prior Year's Appropriation Limit Multiplied by Factor) STATUS OF APPROPRIATION LIMIT Maximum Appropriation Limit (1) Proceeds of Taxes (less Retirement Taxes+ Interest Allocation for
Taxes) Under Maximum Appropriation Limit Over Maximum Appropriation Limit (1) (+)Proceeds of Taxes (-)Retirement Taxes (+) Interest Alloc. on Proceeds of Taxes Total *Source: State Department
of Finance 26,828,168 2,662,338 27,932 24,193,762 EXHIBIT D APPROPRIATION LIMIT-8,490,630 17,267,822 18,927,227 19,017,609 19,779,900 20,710,597 22,057,214 23,109,539 24,304,724 25,565,384
25,955,404 25,506,095 26,245,654 27,387,602 29,083,504 FY 2014-2015 29,242,942 24,193,762 5,049,180 0
Revenue Categories: Taxes Licenses/Permits Revenue from Other Agencies Charges for Services Other Revenue Fines, Forfeits & Penalties Revenue from Money/Prop Total Revenues Taxes (Exclude
Interest) Non-taxes (Exclude Interest) Total-Taxes and Non-Taxes Add: Interest Total-Taxes, Non-Taxes & Interest Interest Distribution (%): Allocation for Taxes Allocation for Non-Taxes
Total Interest Revenue Summary: Taxes plus interest Non-Taxes plus Interest Total Revenues REVENUE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 37.66% 62.34% 100.00% 26,828,168 874,750 18,373,979 14,567,350
8,309,324 1,582,000 781,266 71,316,837 26,828,168 44,414,496 71,242,664 74,173 71,316,837 27,932 46,241 74,173 26,856,100 44,460,737 71,316,837
REVENUE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 Revenue Charges Fines, Revenue Licenses/From other From Transfers Fund No. Fund Name Taxes Permits other For Revenue Forfeits, Money/In Totals Agencies
Services & Penalties Prop 1011 General Fund $ 18,318,289 $ 874,750 $ 118,982 $ 1 '187,450 $ 1,253,446 $ 1,582,000 $ 348,000 $ 2,733,850 26,416,767 1012 Community Development-A ------9,000
-9,000 1013 Community Development Housing -A ----166 166 1014 Community Development -B ----1015 Community Development Housing -B -------1016 Tax Allocation Bond Reserves --------1017
Community Development A Bond --------Proceeds 1018 1099 Bond Proceeds -------1019 2011 Series A Bond Proceeds --------1020 2011 Series B Bond Proceeds --------1021 Redevelopment Obligation
Retirement ---4,448,920 --4,448,920 1022 AB 1484 Housing Asset Fund ----9,200 ---9,200 1023 Enterprise Zone Program ----20,000 ---20,000 1051 Contingency Set Aside --------1052 Refuse
Fund 690,352 --2,560,000 165,200 --3,415,552 2011 Retirement Fund 2,662,338 -----2,662,338 2051 Traffic Safety Fund ------1,885,240 1,885,240 2101 Gas Tax Fund --1,837,312 ---663 -1,837,975
2151 Transportation Invest. ---------(AB2928) Fund 2251 Bike & Ped. Grant -87,156 ----87,156 (SB 821) Fund -2252 LACMTA TOD Planning Grant --780,000 -----780,000 2301 Prop ~A" Fund 1,063,000
-----4,000 -1,067,000 2351 Prop aC" Fund 1,050,000 -------1,050,000 2352 MeasureR 640,000 ---1,500 -641,500 2401 Transportation Fund --18,000 ---1,325,081 1,343,081 2451 Air Quality
Improvement --60,000 Fund ---257 -60,257 2501 State COPS Program Fund --100,000 -----100,000 2551 Local Law Enforcement -------Block Grant ' 2601 Sheriff Drug Seizure Fund -------2651
Street Lighting Fund 1,126,947 ------1,126,947 2701 landscape Maint. 1,127,242 ------245,822 1,373,064 Assessment District
REVENUE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 Revenue Charges Fines, Revenue Licenses/From Other From Transfers Fund No. Fund Name Taxes Permits Other For Revenue Forfeits, Money/In Totals Agencies
Services & Penalties Prop 2751 Impact Fees Fund ---87,500 --300 -87,800 2801 Public Art Fund ---20,000 --500 -20,500 2851 Litter Abatement Fund ---388,400 --500 -388,900 2901 Section
108 Loan Fund ------80 80 2921 Section 108 Loan /2002 ----2,700 -2,700 2941 HUD/CDBG Fund --1,296,723 ----1,296,723 2961 HUD Home Program Fund --527,237 ----527,237 2962 Cal Home State
Grant -1,000,000 ----1,000,000 3381 Business Improvement 150,000 ---5,000 -230 -155,230 District Fund 3421 Anti-Utter Grant Fund ---------3501 Beverage Recycle Grant --18,472 ---210
-18,682 Fund 3521 Urban Tree Planting Grant Fund ---------3541 LA Co. Park Maint. Grant ----Fund -----3561 Other Grant Fund --197,994 -----197,994 3621 Used Oil Recycling Grant --20,000
-----20,000 Fund 3661 2000 Bond AcVPer Capita ---------Grant Fund 3681 TEA Grant Fund --2,159,627 -----2,159,627 3682 DOE Block Grant ---------3701 Safe School Route Grant -----Fund
---3721 State of CA CEC Grant --------3741 Dupont/Lead Safety Grant -----123 -123 Fund 3782 Prop 84 Park Grant --9,775,031 -----9,775,031 3791 Prop 18 Fund -------3801 Justice Assistance
Grant --48,225 ----48,225 3821 RMC Grant ---------3861 State Transp. Partnership ---------Program 4011 Capital Projecs Fund --347,220 ----27,219,648 27,566,868 (by project) 4101 Park
Replacement Fund ---------4151 CIP Loan Proceeds Fund ------
REVENUE SUMMARY FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 Revenue Charges Fines, Revenue Licenses/From other From Transfers Fund No. Fund Name Taxes Permits Other For Revenue Forfeits, Moneyf In Totals
Agencies Services & Penalties Prop 4451 Roberti-Zberg-Harris Fund ---------5011 City Debt Service Fund ------500 1,642,579 1,643,079 6011 1999 Water Bonds ----Proceeds --6051 Water/Enterprise
Fund --8,906,000 -36,890 -8,942,890 6151 1995 Water Revenue Bonds ---------6201 2003 Enterprise Revenue -------Bonds 6301 2008 Enterprise Rev Bond -----Series A 6401 Sewer Fund 1,400,000
1,400,000 7011 Garage Fund ------325,647 -325,647 7151 Self-Insurance Fund ----2,407,558 -50,000 729,511 3,187,069 9011 Public Finance Authority -------16,416 16,416 9051 2003 Lease
Revenue ------Refunding --9052 2010 Lease Revenue Bonds Series A ---------Totals $ 26,828,168 $ 874,750 $ 18,373,979 $ 14,567,350 $ 8,309,324 $ 1,582,000 $ 781,266 $ 35,798,147 $ 107,114,984
Deduct interest (74,173) Taxes 26,828,168 Non-taxes 44.414,496
• .,.:~" y4. T Q 1:-.c-. ! ' '1-~ "' n 0 " " DEPARTMENT OF o"'"'F"OFl,_.,,. F 1 N A N C E -----=====--=-=::-:--;-;-:=;;-;;7.E:C:::o:::M:.::U;:.N::;o~Gcc.-:B~R~D;';WCON7,;~0:R;,. -="='"'::C"=:V=E'::R:
'NC::D:::=R STAT£ CAPITOL. ROOM 1 14!5.. SACRAMENTO CA. 95814•4998. WWW.DCIF".CA.DCIV Cn:lCE OF" THE DIRECTOR May 2014 Dear Fiscal Officer: Subject: Price and Population Information
Appropriations Limit The California Revenue and Taxation Code, section 2227, mandates the Department of Finance (Finance) to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population
to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2014, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price
factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2014-15. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the
price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2014-15 appropriations appropriations limit. Attachment B provides city and unincorporated county population percentage
change. Attachment C provides population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized
populations and military populations. Population Percent Change for Special Districts Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. Consult the Revenue and Taxation
Code section 2228 for further information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XIII B, section 9(C), of the State Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations
limit calculation mandate. The Code and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website: http:llleginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml. Special districts required
by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this issue should be referred to their
respective county for clarification, or to their legal representation, or to the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits. Population Certification The population
certification program applies only to cities and counties. Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the
current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2014. Please Note: Prior year's city population
estimates may be revised. If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086. MICHAEL COHEN Director By: KEELY M. BOSLER Chief
Deputy Director Attachment
May 2014 Attachment A A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing
body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting
the fiscal year 2014-15 appropriation limit is: Per Capita Personal Income Fiscal Year (FY) Percentage change over prior year 2014-15 -0.23 B. Following is an example using sample population
change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2014-15 appropriation limit. 2014-15: Per Capita Cost of Living Change = -0.23 percent
Population Change = 0.95 percent Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: Population converted to a ratio: Calculation of factor for FY 2014-15: -0.23 + 100 = 0.9977 100 0.95
+ 100 = 1.0095 100 0.9977 X 1.0095 = 1.0072
Fiscal Year2014-15 Attachment B Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions* January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014 and Total Population, January 1, 2014 Total County Percent Change
Po~:;~:ulation Minus Exclusions Po(!ulation City 2013-2014 1·1·13 1-1-14 1-1-2014 Los Angeles Agoura Hills 0.47 20,528 20,625 20,625 Alhambra 0.48 84,290 84,697 84,697 Arcadia 1.05 56,901
57,500 57,500 Artesia 0.51 16,606 16,690 16,776 Avalon 0.55 3,799 3,820 3,820 Azusa 1.62 47,614 48,385 48,385 Baldwin Park 0.46 76,362 76,715 76,715 Bell 0.47 35,804 35,972 35,972 Bellflower
0.53 77,330 77,741 77,741 Bell Gardens 0.48 42,463 42,667 42,667 Beverly Hills 0.47 34,515 34,677 34,677 Bradbury 0.74 1,074 1,082 1,082 Burbank 0.47 105,045 105,543 105,543 Calabasas
0.53 23,816 23,943 23,943 Carson 0.42 92,251 92,636 92,636 Cerritos 0.47 49,506 49,741 49,741 Claremont 0.42 35,768 35,920 35,920 Commerce 0.47 12,942 13,003 13,003 Compton 0.49 97,608
98,082 98,082 Covina 0.48 48,387 48,619 48,619 Cudahy 0.47 24,028 24,142 24,142 Culver City 0.88 39,233 39,579 39,579 Diamond Bar 0.48 56,133 56,400 56,400 Downey 0.47 112,829 113,363
113,363 Duarte 0.47 21,567 21,668 21,668 El Monte 0.49 114,503 115,064 115,064 EISegundo 0.49 16,815 16,897 16,897 Gardena 0.81 59,602 60,082 60,082 Glendale 1.05 193,769 195,799 195,799
Glendora 1.17 50,697 51,290 51,290 Hawaiian Gardens 0.50 14,384 14,456 14,456 Hawthorne 1.31 85,526 86,644 86,644 Hermosa Beach 0.43 19,666 19,750 19,750 Hidden Hills 0.64 1,889 1,901
1,901 Huntington Park 0.63 58,661 59,033 59,033 Industry 0.23 437 438 438 Inglewood 0.50 111,238 111,795 111,795 Irwindale 0.76 1,455 1,466 1.466 La Canada Flintridge 0.41 20,452 20,535
20,535 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran
homes.
Fiscal Year 2014-15 Attachment B Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions"' January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014 and Total Population, January 1, 2014 Total County Percent
Change Pog:ulation Minus Exclusions Po(!ulation City 2013-2014 1-1-13 1-1-14 1-1-2014 Los Angeles (Continued) La Habra Heights 0.69 5,383 5,420 5,420 Lakewood 0.49 80,830 81,224 81,224
La Mirada 0.45 48,958 49,178 49,178 Lancaster 0.78 153,809 155,012 159,878 La Puente 0.58 40,245 40,478 40,478 La Verne 0.53 32,059 32,228 32,228 Lawndale 0.46 33,077 33,228 33,228 Lomita
0.50 20,528 20,630 20,630 Long Beach 0.51 467,817 470,184 470,292 Los Angeles 1.00 3,863,013 3,901,605 3,904,657 Lynwood 0.42 70,685 70,980 70,980 Malibu 0.71 12,774 12,865 12,865 Manhattan
Beach 0.49 35,445 35,619 35,619 Maywood 0.47 27,627 27,758 27,758 Monrovia 0.53 36,966 37,162 37,162 Montebello 0.48 63,222 63,527 63,527 Monterey ParK 0.48 61,482 61,777 61,777 Norwalk
0.42 105,501 105,948 106,630 Palmdale 0.66 154,629 155,657 155,657 Palos Verdes Estates 0.50 13,597 13,665 13,665 Paramount 0.72 54,657 55,051 55,051 Pasadena 0.55 140,102 140,879 140,879
Pica Rivera 0.47 63,572 63,873 63,873 Pomona 0.53 150,814 151,611 151,713 Rancho Palos Verdes 0.52 42,121 42,341 42,358 Redondo Beach 0.42 67,437 67,717 67,717 Rolling Hills 0.48 1,886
1,895 1,895 Rolling Hills Estates 0.48 8,145 8,184 8,184 Rosemead 0.49 54,497 54,762 54,762 San Dimas 1.09 33,706 34,072 34,072 San Fernando 0.54 24,093 24,222 24,222 San Gabriel 0.34
40,178 40,313 40,313 San Marino 0.66 13,254 13,341 13,341 Santa Clarita 1.98 205,075 209,130 209,130 Santa Fe Springs 3.12 16,781 17,304 17,349 Santa Monica 1.20 91,094 92,185 92,185
Sierra Madre 0.58 11,030 11,094 11,094 Signal Hill 1.65 11,226 11,411 11,411 South El Monte 0.50 20,325 20,426 20,426 South Gate 0.93 95,173 96,057 96,057 South Pasadena 0.53 25,874
26,011 26,011 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and
veteran veteran homes.
Fiscal Year 2014-15 Attachment B Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions* January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2014 and Total Population, January 1, 2014 County City Los Angeles
(Continued) Temple City Torrance Vernon Walnut West Covina West Hollywood Westlake Village Whittier Unincorporated County Total Percent Change 2013-2014 0.44 0.52 0.83 0.49 0.48 0.56
0.47 0.46 0.54 0.78 Peculation Minus Exclusions 1-1-13 1-1-14 35,974 36,134 146,949 147,706 121 122 29,966 30,112 107,313 107,828 34,875 35,072 8,347 8,386 86,144 86,538 1,039,757 1,045,382
9,953,626 10,031,664 Total Poiiliiation 1-1-2014 36,134 147,706 122 30,112 107,828 35,072 8,386 86,538 1,046,557 10,041,797 *Exclusions include residents on federal military installations
and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes.
RESOLUTION NO. __ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ADOPTING THE FY 2014·15 SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council
as Successor Agency to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency reviewed the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2014-15 Proposed Budget for the Successor Agency attached as Exhibit "E"; and WHEREAS,
the agenda for the June 24, 2014 meeting of the City Council as Successor Agency to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency was duly posted, and the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2014-15 Proposed
Budget for the Successor Agency and all related agenda material were made available to all interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Successor Agency budget for Fiscal Year 2014-15 is hereby adopted as presented in the City Manager's FY 2014-15 Proposed Budget.
Section 2. The City Manager or her designee is hereby authorized to approve any transfer between accounts, provided that they are within the same department and the same fund. Section
3. This resolution shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 241h day of June 2014. ATTEST: Maria Quinonez Secretary Aide Castro President
Sarah Magana Withers City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: David Garcia Authority Counsel 2 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Amanda Roberson Director of Finance
City of Lynwood Exhibit E FY 15 Proposed Successor Agency Budget FY 14 FY14 Year-End Adopted Estimates Revenues Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) Revenues $ 4,112,933 $ 4,391,460
Administrative Cost Allowance 250,000 250,000 Total: $ 4,362,933 $ 4,641,460 Ex(!enditures Administrative Allowance $ 250,000 $ 243,700 Project Staffng Costs 466,500 466,500 ROPS Administration
3,646,433 3,931,260 Total: $ 4,362,933 $ 4,641,460 FY15 City Manager Proposed Budget $ 4,198,920 250,000 $ 4,448,920 $ 250,000 405,000 3,791,049 $ 4,446,049