HomeMy Public PortalAbout07 July 14, 2021 Commission
MEETING AGENDA
TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, July 14, 2021
Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, (March 18, 2020), the meeting will only be
conducted via video conferencing and by telephone. Please follow the instructions on the following page to
join the meeting remotely.
COMMISSIONERS
Chair – Jan Harnik
Vice Chair – V. Manuel Perez
Second Vice Chair – Bob Magee
Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District 1
Karen Spiegel, County of Riverside, District 2
Chuck Washington, County of Riverside, District 3
V. Manuel Perez, County of Riverside, District 4
Jeff Hewitt, County of Riverside, District 5
Kyle Pingree / Alberto Sanchez, City of Banning
Lloyd White / David Fenn, City of Beaumont
Joseph DeConinck / Johnny Rodriguez, City of Blythe
Linda Molina / Wendy Hewitt, City of Calimesa
Jeremy Smith / Larry Greene, City of Canyon Lake
Raymond Gregory / Mark Carnevale, City of Cathedral City
Steven Hernandez / Denise Delgado, City of Coachella
Wes Speake / Jim Steiner, City of Corona
Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs
Clint Lorimore / Todd Rigby, City of Eastvale
Linda Krupa / Russ Brown, City of Hemet
Dana Reed / Donna Griffith, City of Indian Wells
Waymond Fermon / Oscar Ortiz, City of Indio
Brian Berkson / Guillermo Silva, City of Jurupa Valley
Kathleen Fitzpatrick / Robert Radi, City of La Quinta
Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore
Bill Zimmerman / Dean Deines, City of Menifee
Yxstain Gutierrez / To Be Appointed, City of Moreno Valley
Scott Vinton / Lisa DeForest, City of Murrieta
Ted Hoffman / Katherine Aleman, City of Norco
Jan Harnik / Kathleen Kelly, City of Palm Desert
Lisa Middleton / Dennis Woods, City of Palm Springs
Michael M. Vargas / Rita Rogers, City of Perris
Ted Weill / Charles Townsend, City of Rancho Mirage
Chuck Conder / Erin Edwards, City of Riverside
Alonso Ledezma / Crystal Ruiz, City of San Jacinto
Matt Rahn / Maryann Edwards, City of Temecula
Ben J. Benoit / Joseph Morabito, City of Wildomar
Mike Beauchamp, Governor’s Appointee Caltrans District 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
www.rctc.org
MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
9:30 a.m.
Wednesday, July 14, 2021
Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order N-29-20, (March 18, 2020), the meeting will only be
conducted via video conferencing and by telephone. Please follow the instructions below to join the
meeting remotely.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION
Join Zoom Meeting
https://rctc.zoom.us/j/88112969755
Meeting ID: 881 1296 9755
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,88112969755# US (San Jose)
Dial by your location
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
For members of the public wishing to submit comment in connection with the Commission Meeting
please email written comments to the Clerk of the Board at lmobley@rctc.org prior to July 13, 2021 at
5:00 p.m. and your comments will be made part of the official record of the proceedings. Members of
the public may also make public comments through their telephone or Zoom connection when
recognized by the Chair.
In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to
the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of
the public prior to the meeting on the Commission’s website, www.rctc.org.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, Executive Order N-29-20, and the
Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed
to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge.
Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made
to provide assistance at the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda
July 14, 2021
Page 2
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or
discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the
agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be
placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration.
5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS – The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a
finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the
attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item
to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission
members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will
be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR – All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion
unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the
Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
6A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JUNE 9 2021
Page 1
6B. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Page 22
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on state and federal
legislation.
6C. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FUNDING REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF JURUPA ROAD
GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT
Page 28
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve programming $25 million of 2009 Measure A Western County Regional
Arterial (MARA) funds for the city of Jurupa Valley’s Jurupa Road Grade
Separation project;
2) Approve Agreement No. 21-72-121-00 between the Commission and the County
of Riverside (County) as the lead agency for the programming of $25 million of
MARA for the construction phase of the Jurupa Road Grade Separation project;
and
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
finalize and execute the agreement.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda
July 14, 2021
Page 3
6D. AGREEMENT FOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES STRATEGIC PLAN
Page 34
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-65-043-00 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. to
develop a transit-oriented communities strategic plan for an 18-month base
period with two additional six-month optional terms in an amount of $924,674,
plus a contingency amount of $25,326, for a total amount not to exceed
$950,000;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
finalize and execute the agreement, including option terms, on behalf of the
Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work up
to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services.
6E. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH BNSF RAILWAY FOR
INTERSTATE 15/STATE ROUTE 91 EXPRESS LANES CONNECTOR PROJECT
Page 96
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-31-098-00 with BNSF Railway (BNSF) for a
construction and maintenance (C&M) agreement, including property acquisition,
for the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC)
in the amount of $1,988,607, plus a contingency amount of $104,470, for a total
amount not to exceed $2,093,077;
2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to finalize
negotiations with BNSF and execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission;
and
3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the
contingency amount as may be required by the 15/91 ELC.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda
July 14, 2021
Page 4
6F. AGREEMENT FOR CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL CONSTRUCTION ZONE
ENHANCEMENT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM SERVICES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE COMMISSION’S HIGHWAY PROJECTS
Page 164
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-31-103-00, with the California Highway Patrol (CHP)
for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) services used
during the construction of Commission highway projects (Projects), for a total
amount not to exceed $4 million for a five-year term; and
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
finalize and execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission.
6G. AGREEMENTS FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICE
Page 172
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-45-049-00 to Pepe’s Towing Service Inc. (Pepe’s) for
Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) tow truck services on State Route (SR) 91, Beat No.
4, for a five-year term, in an amount of $1,666,787, plus a contingency amount of
$83,340, for a total amount not to exceed $1,750,127;
2) Approve Agreement No. 21-45-050-00 to Pepe’s for FSP tow truck services on
SR-60, Beat No. 7, for a five-year term, in an amount of $1,666,787, plus a
contingency amount of $83,340, for a total amount not to exceed $1,750,127;
3) Approve Agreement No. 21-45-051-00 to Pepe’s for FSP tow truck services on
SR-60, Beat No. 8, for a five-year term, in an amount of $1,666,787, plus a
contingency amount of $83,340, for a total amount not to exceed $1,750,127;
4) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to
finalize and execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and
5) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the
contingency amount as may be required for these services.
6H. 2021 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Page 314
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve the 2021 State Route 91 Implementation
Plan.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda
July 14, 2021
Page 5
7. 2022 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING DISTRIBUTION AND
DRAFT FUND ESTIMATE
Page 362
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve the 2022 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) funding distribution among the three geographic areas in Riverside County per
the adopted STIP intracounty Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
8. COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT REPORT: FISCAL YEARS 2017/18 THROUGH 2019/20
Page 366
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Countywide Transit Report for
Fiscal Year 2017/18 through FY 2019/20.
9. FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 375
Overview
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-41-123-00 among the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (Commission), San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA),
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCTA), and Ventura County Transportation Commission
(VCTC), for a total contract amount of $977,719 for Regional Rideshare Software over a
three-year term, including the Commission’s total share of $186,444 inclusive of
$18,000 in contingency;
2) Approve Agreement No. 20-41-090-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement
No. 20-41-090-00, with SBCTA for Rideshare Program Implementation, removing
Rideshare and Vanpool Software expenses from the Scope of Work and incorporating
them into Agreement No. 21-41-123-00;
3) Approve Memorandum of Understanding No. 21-41-122-00 between LACMTA, OCTA,
RCTC, SBCTA, and VCTC to merge and consolidate the agencies’ rideshare databases;
4) Adopt Resolution No. 21-013, “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Adopting Amended Guidelines for the Administration of the Measure A
Funded Commuter Incentive Projects as Part of Its Commuter Assistance Program”; and
5) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to finalize
and execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda
July 14, 2021
Page 6
10. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
11. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Overview
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report
on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities.
• Update on CV Rail Public Hearings
12. CLOSED SESSION
12A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee
Item Property Description Property Owner Buyer(s)
1 118-160-004 RCTC Regency Realty
2 117-122-001, 002, & 029 RCTC Inland Investment Group
3 229-082-003, 010 RCTC Parag Patel
12B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (d) of
Section 54956.9: 1 potential case
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9:
1 potential case
13. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA ITEM 6A
MINUTES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, June 9, 2021
1.CALL TO ORDER
The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Jan Harnik at
9:30 a.m., via Zoom Meeting ID 872 1813 3305. Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive
Order N-29-20.
2.ROLL CALL
Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent
Mike Beauchamp Bob Magee Yxstain Gutierrez
Ben J. Benoit Lisa Middleton Alonso Ledezma
Brian Berkson Linda Molina Kyle Pingree
Russell Betts V. Manuel Perez
Chuck Conder Matt Rahn*
Joseph DeConinck Dana Reed
David Fenn Wes Speake
Waymond Fermon Karen Spiegel
Kathleen Fitzpatrick Jeremy Smith
Raymond Gregory Michael M. Vargas
Jan Harnik Scott Vinton
Steven Hernandez* Chuck Washington
Jeff Hewitt* Ted Weill
Ted Hoffman Bill Zimmerman
Kevin Jeffries
Linda Krupa
Clint Lorimore
*Arrived after the meeting was called to order.
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Karen Spiegel led the Commission in a flag salute.
4.PUBLIC COMMENTS
Marven Norman, Rail Passenger Association of California Member, stated he wanted to
comment about the plans for the Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor project
as he has been following it. One thing they are concerned about as he noticed that it is
RCTC’s project it is going to focus on Riverside and on Riverside County’s needs. As the
1
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 2
environmental document is put out, the project will cost $1 billion to build the track with
Union Pacific Railroad (UP) and there should be more public benefit out of it then just two
daily round trip trains. Mr. Norman suggested the Commission work with other partners,
including Arizona, Calexico, or Imperial Valley as that has been studied in the past in
looking at extending services all the way down to Calexico. He expressed there needs to
be more than two trains a day round trip because UP is opening a new popup intermodal
yard where this track would start in Colton. There is still a single track between Indio and
Yuma so why would the Commission build 80 miles of a third track when they still have
30 miles of single track that could be filled. He stated that there could be a bit of a
bottleneck as that third track will not necessarily be needed as much as they are
proposing. It is a good project in concept but there needs to be more out of it then just
two daily trains when spending that amount of money.
At this time, Commissioners Steven Hernandez, Jeff Hewitt, Matt Rahn, and Jeremy Smith joined
the meeting.
Chair Harnik provided the instructions for public comments.
Brian Yanity, the Vice President-South of the Rail Passenger Association of California and
Nevada, concurred with Mr. Norman’s comments and stated the Amtrak Sunset Limited
has an effort underway to increase the frequency of that to daily. Currently it stops three
times per week in Palm Springs and that is the only stop with Sunset Limited in Riverside
County. The Sunset Limited goes from Los Angeles (LA) to New Orleans via Tuscan, El Paso,
San Antonio, Houston, and points in between and it would be a great benefit for that to
go daily. He stated in 2011, the Commission adopted a resolution in favor of the daily
Sunset Limited and suggested that needs to be done again and it should be sent to the
Congressional Representatives. On the Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor
project they do want to see more than two trains a day each way and the third track that
UP is asking for to go from Colton to Indio, there is a lot of utility to that third track beyond
Coachella Valley rail passenger service as important as that is and suggested it should be
12 trains both ways. It can be used to enhance the Sunset Limited to get that to daily trips
and it will provide a lot more freight traffic for UP, there is also the proposed passenger
trains from Arizona to LA via the Coachella Valley. All of those things should be factored
in when it comes to that third track along with the capacity of the BNSF San Bernardino
Subdivision, which goes through Riverside from San Bernardino to LA via Fullerton. Mr.
Yanity stated if the Sunset Limited would go to daily the most likely scenario is it would
be rerouted through Riverside and Fullerton so downtown Riverside could be a stop on
the Sunset Limited and he requested the Commission’s support for that.
Chair Harnik expressed appreciation to Mr. Norman and Mr. Yanity for their time and their
engagement and stated they should provide their comments on the draft environmental
document that was released on the proposed Coachella Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail
Corridor project.
2
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 3
Jim Steiner, RCTC’s Alternate and a city of Corona Council Member, referred to the $1.4
billion 91 Expansion project that was completed a few years ago and stated their residents
had high hopes that this project would improve their commute and the overall conditions
on their local streets. Specifically on the west end of Corona near Serfas Club Drive and
Green River Road unfortunately, they have seen little or no improvement. Several
projects are in the works along SR-91 that will hopefully speed up the traffic flow on the
freeway, which in theory should improve circulation on their local streets. He expressed
appreciation for this and to the Commissioners for approving these upcoming projects.
As it relates to the I-15 and he expressed that they are frustrated, angry, and disappointed
once again because after all the work that was done there is backup on their city streets
and residential neighborhoods. Council Member Steiner stated on the south end of town
it has become notably worse primarily on Ontario Avenue, Foothill Parkway/El Cerrito
Road, Masters Drive and Cajalco Road and there is a horrible pinch point on the west end
of Corona and now there is a new one on the south end of Corona. For years residents
and commuters have not been able to get out of Corona in a reasonable time in the
morning when trying to get to their jobs in LA and Orange County. Now the residents
cannot get out of Corona as they navigate south to return home from work, even worse
for the citizens of Corona is that they are stuck in mess as they try to get their kids home
from school, go out to dinner, or patronize local businesses. He expressed not being able
to catch a break on the weekends around noon this past weekend traffic was barely
traveling along the I-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road. Citizens have suggested that maybe
RCTC should close the recently opened I-15 toll lanes until after adequate funding is
available to build the proper freeway infrastructure that does not negatively impact local
streets. Others have suggested moving the southbound toll road exit points further to
the north to allow for greater distance to accomplish their merge to the general purpose
lanes and off ramps. He noted that RCTC has the funding to add an arterial lane from
Cajalco Road and is also looking at restriping options. He expressed on behalf of the
residents of Corona he is urging RCTC to continue to look at some temporary or
permanent improvements in the short term while long term improvements continue to
be planned and funded. Council Member Steiner stated morning and afternoon
commutes will likely always be a challenge for this region but the hundreds of millions of
dollars invested in our local freeways should not make life more difficult for the citizens
on the local streets and in their neighborhoods.
Chair Harnik expressed appreciation to Council Member Steiner for his time and for his
input. She noted having time to consider the issues raised at the May Commission
meeting and generally how the Commissioners communicate to their residents. She was
reminded that the communication they provide to their communities concerning their
work here is critically important and they have a responsibility not only to bring their
communities’ voices to this Commission, but they also have an obligation to share in an
accurate manner the sometimes difficult facts about traffic management, financing, and
growth with their cities. She stated that means understanding and voicing the
Commissions’ role on our county’s transportation network, it means sharing with our
community members the process for deciding how projects are funded and ultimately
3
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 4
approved by this Commission. It may also require correcting inaccurate information
circulating within our communities that if left unaddressed can lead to tempers flaring
among their residents. Over the last few weeks, she has seen on social media a small and
persistent set of voices speaking out against the I-15 Express Lanes and other Commission
led work. One person wrote online the I-15 Express Lanes project designer “should be
shot.” While the comment was eventually removed, these words are violent, and words
matter. She expressed fearing that everyone has become so accustomed to harmful
online content and are numb to language like this. She suggested they can all agree that
this level of violence is disturbing, and it must stop. On SR-91 there have been BB gun
shootings, a little boy was killed on SR-55 from an apparent road rage incident, and our
hearts go out to the victims and their families at the San Jose Valley Transportation
Authority mass shooting. Words do matter and it does not take much for violent words
to spark a violent reaction. Inciting anger does not encourage constructive thought or
solutions; with calm they can process, they can bring logic and have productive
conversations. Every month the Commissioners come together to make decisions for our
county’s transportation system, they work to implement voter approved Measure A
projects, provide oversight and direction to staff on projects and budgeting, and they
work to respond to the needs of their communities. Let’s commit to doing this well,
respectfully, civilly, to ask questions, participate in the process, and communicate to our
residents and community groups the meaning behind the work they do. That is the
foundation of a democratic society and a privilege and honor that they all share as elected
officials. We are not going to agree on every issue but let’s agree to consider the
importance of how we communicate in order to do our part to turn down the
temperature, turn down the tone so that we can work together finding real solutions for
the issues in front of them. She knows as they continue this meeting, they will do their
best to find solutions needed to make their communities quality of life as good as it can
possibly be, and she expressed appreciation for allowing her to speak.
Vice Chair Manuel Perez expressed appreciation as Chair Harnik’s words were very
powerful. As Chair Harnik mentioned words matter and he thanked Chair Harnik for her
leadership and making that point for all the Commissioners as it makes good sense.
Chair Harnik expressed appreciation for Vice Chair Perez’s comments and stated that is
very important and she knows they can get this job done and do it well.
Commissioner Chuck Washington concurred with Vice Chair Perez’s comments and
expressed that Chair Harnik should be aware that a lot of people that are in this meeting
are very supportive of what she just said.
Commissioner Wes Speake stated as the representative in the area that a lot of this stuff
comes from, he thanked Chair Harnik acknowledging that the pain is real, the emotion is
real, and equally for trying to get to a point to find corrective and creative solutions to
bring that temperature down and communicate the next steps. He noted having
additional comments, but he will reserve those until the end of the meeting.
4
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 5
Commissioner Karen Spiegel stated to Chair Harnik she would be remiss if she did not
make a comment, because she is glad that it is somebody outside her district that stood
up. It has been a tough time as she has personally dealt with this and as much of the
things they want to do and wanted to get community meetings going but when it started
it went exactly the way Chair Harnik described. She stated as Commissioner Speake
commented about getting the community together, she concurred but it gets so negative,
so the Commission needs Commissioner Speake’s help to turn those attitudes around.
Every time something is said it gets twisted and it is an ongoing issue, they want to fix it,
but some things just are in a process and will not be fixed overnight. Commissioner
Spiegel suggested they need to somehow come to a reasonable way of moving forward
so that as time goes, they can fix some of these issues. She stated they all are working
different angles and solutions that may not be seen by all, but they have to go by what
this organization is leading the Commissioners, keep moving forward, and working for a
commonsense solution that they can all live with.
Chair Harnik thanked Commissioner Spiegel and noted as Commissioner Spiegel stated
during the Pledge of Allegiance, we have opportunity here and expressed making the
most of this opportunity.
5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS
There were no additions or revisions to the agenda.
7. PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
At this time, Chair Harnik announced this public hearing remains open from the May
Commission meeting and called on Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance, to
present the proposed Budget for FY 2021/22.
Michele Cisneros, presented the proposed FY Budget for FY 2021/22, highlighting the
following areas:
• Budget adjustments, budget summary, revenues/sources comparison, and
summary of expenditures, expenses, and uses
• Management Services, Regional Programs, and Capital Project Development &
Delivery expenditures/uses
• Capital Project highlights, toll operations, function breakdown, Measure A
Administrative costs
• Next steps
Chair Harnik asked if there were any public comments. There were no public comments
and no written comments received. At this time, Chair Harnik closed the public hearing.
She asked if there were any comments from the Commissioners on the budget that is
5
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 6
presented. She expressed appreciation to Michele Cisneros for her explanation on
generation and allocation of Measure A, LTF, and STA funds.
Commissioner Spiegel expressed appreciation to Michele Cisneros for an awesome job
both in the written document and her explanation was very clear and as Chair Harnik
stated with the Measure A there is always that lingering piece of document that they have
to make sure they keep reiterating what voters voted for and that those guidelines are
being met.
M/S/C (Berkson/Perez) to:
1) Receive input on the proposed Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22;
2) Approve the revised mid-year FY 2020/21 revenue projections of $210
million for 2009 Measure A revenues for a revenue budget increase of
$15 million and a related local streets and roads expenditure budget
increase of $4,573,000 to reflect the revised FY 2020/21 Measure A
projection;
3) Approve the revised mid-year FY 2020/21 revenue projections of
$105 million for Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenues for a revenue
budget increase of $5 million and the related planning allocation
expenditure budget increases of $113,000 and transfer out of $150,000
to reflect the revised FY 2020/21 LTF projection;
4) Approve the revised FY 2021/22 revenue projections of $210 million for
2009 Measure A and $105 million for LTF;
5) Approve the salary schedule effective July 1, 2021, located in Appendix B
of the proposed budget;
6) Authorize the expenditure of $1,025,700 of 91 Express Lanes toll
revenues designated as surplus in accordance with the 2013 Toll Revenue
Bonds Indenture to fund Commission costs related to the development
of agreements related to the funding, construction, operations,
maintenance, and use of toll revenues for the future direct, tolled
connector linking the SR-241 toll road to the 91 Express Lanes
(241/91 Connector);
7) Close the public hearing on the proposed Budget for FY 2021/22; and
8) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2021/22.
Chair Harnik noted that is good news because a year ago if they would have asked, she
did not think that there would be such a rosy picture with the sales tax.
6
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 7
8. CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S/C (Gregory/Molina) to approve the following Consent Calendar items.
Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, stated per the Campaign Contribution form that was
submitted, (Best Best and Krieger, LLP) BB&K’s contract is on Agenda Item 8G,” Recurring
Contracts for Fiscal Year 2021/22”, there was a campaign contribution that was given to
Commissioner Jeffries and he would recommend that Commissioner Jeffries abstain on
that agenda item or at least related to the BB&K contract.
Commissioner Jeffries abstained on the BB&K contract for Agenda item 8G.
8A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MAY 12, 2021
8B. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FY 2021/22
Adopt Resolution No. 21-010 “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit”, for Fiscal Year
2021/22.
8C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the nine months ended
March 31, 2021.
8D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended
March 31, 2021.
8E. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS
Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4, 2020 (4Q 2020).
8F. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION PROPOSED TRIENNIAL OVERALL
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOAL FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS
2022-2024
1) Approve 11 percent as the Commission’s Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) proposed triennial overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
race-neutral goal for Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2022-24 for the period
October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2024; and
2) Adopt Resolution No. 21-007, “Resolution of the Riverside County
Transportation Commission Adopting Its Triennial Overall Disadvantaged
7
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 8
Business Enterprise Program Goal (49 CFR Part 26) as it Applies to Funding
Received Directly from the Federal Transit Administration”.
8G. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22
1) Approve the single-year recurring contracts in an amount not to exceed
$15,679,516 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22;
2) Approve the recurring multi-year contracts for specialized services on long-
term projects in an amount not to exceed $1,373,967 in FY 2021/22 and
$2,801,989 in FYs 2022/23 – 2025/26; and
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission.
8H. QUARTERLY PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT METRICS REPORT, JANUARY-MARCH 2021
Receive and file the Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics Report for January-
March 2021.
8I. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation.
8J. 91 EXPRESS LANES MONTHLY STATUS REPORTS
Receive and file the 91 Express Lanes Monthly Reports for the three months from
January to March 2021.
8K. AMENDMENTS TO ON CALL PURCHASE AGREEMENTS FOR 6C TRANSPONDERS
1) Approve the amendments to the following 6C transponder provider
agreements for an additional four years with no additional cost
authorization:
a) Agreement No. 18-31-094-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement
No. 18-31-094-00, with Kapsch TraffficCom USA, Inc.; and
b) Agreement No. 18-31-161-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement
No. 18-31-161-00, with Neology, Inc.;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute purchase orders
awarded to the contractors under the terms of the agreements.
8
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 9
8L. READOPTED AND REAFFIRMED THE 15 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY GOALS AND
TOLL POLICIES
Adopt Resolution No. 21-012, “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Reaffirming and Readopting the Amended and Restated Interstate 15
Express Lanes Toll Policy Goals and Toll Policies and Ratifying Actions in the
Furtherance of the Policy”.
8M. STATE ROUTE 71/STATE ROUTE 91 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, CONSTRUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS
1) Award Agreement No. 21-31-012-00 to Falcon Engineering Services to
provide construction management (CM), materials testing, construction
surveying and environmental monitoring services for the State Route (SR)
71/SR-91 (71/91) interchange improvement project (Project) in the
amount of $16,756,467, plus a contingency amount of $1,443,533, for a
total amount not to exceed $18,200,000;
2) Approve Agreement No. 21-31-091-00 for the Project construction and
maintenance (C&M) agreement with BNSF Railway in the amount of
$1,957,727, plus a contingency amount of $195,773, for a total amount
not to exceed $2,153,500;
3) Approve Agreement No. 21-31-067-00, a cooperative agreement between
the Commission and Caltrans, that defines the roles and responsibilities for
Project construction at no cost to the Commission;
4) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,
to finalize and execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and
5) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency
work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for these services.
8N. AMENDMENT TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PERRIS AND
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL FOR THE
INTERSTATE 215/PLACENTIA AVENUE INTERCHANGE PROJECT
1) Approve Agreement No. 16-31-066-06, Amendment No. 6 to Agreement
No. 16-31-066-00, with T.Y. Lin International (T.Y. Lin) for design support
during construction of the Interstate 215/Placentia Avenue Interchange
project (Project) in the amount of $257,285, plus a contingency amount of
$25,728, for an additional amount of $283,013, and a total amount not to
exceed $5,454,198;
2) Approve Agreement No. 19-31-044-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement
No. 19-31-044-00, with the city of Perris (City) for storm drain
improvements on Placentia Avenue and street and signal improvements at
the Placentia Avenue and Indian Avenue intersection for the Project for an
9
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 10
additional Commission contribution of $1,081,157 and a total Commission
contribution not to exceed $1,231,157;
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel
review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and
4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency
work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the design
support services.
8O. POLICY UPDATE ON THE USE OF STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDING BY
OPERATORS
Adopt Resolution No. 21-011, “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Regarding the Policy for Use of State Transit Assistance Funding by
Transit Operators”.
8P. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 21-009 TO BECOME THE ACCESS FUND
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES ACCESS
FOR ALL PROGRAM
1) Adopt Resolution No. 21-009, “A Resolution of the Riverside County
Transportation Commission Authorizing the Execution of the Certification
to Serve as the Local Access Fund Administrator (LAFA) for the Access for
All Program for the County of Riverside”; and
2) Authorize the Executive Director or designee, pursuant to legal counsel
review, to execute agreements and/or documents related to the
Transportation Network Companies (TNC) Access for All program on behalf
of the Commission.
8Q. AMENDMENT TO CITY OF BANNING’S FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 SHORT RANGE
TRANSIT PLAN
1) Approve an amendment to the city of Banning’s (City) FY 2020/21 Short
Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect the operating shortfalls in FY 2019/20
and FY 2020/21 and increase the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) operating
allocation in the net amount of $597,039;
2) Approve the reprogramming of $134,213 of State Transit Assistance (STA)
from capital assistance to operating assistance for the City for FY 2019/20
operating expenses;
3) Approve the reprogramming of $135,000 of LTF from the Comprehensive
Operational Analysis (COA) capital assistance to operating assistance for
FY 2020/21 operating expenses;
4) Approve an additional FY 2020/21 LTF allocation of $217,039 to the City
for FY 2019/20 operating expenses; and
10
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 11
5) Approve an additional FY 2020/21 LTF allocation of $380,000 to the City
for FY 2020/21 operating expenses.
8R. AMENDMENT TO RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY’S FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 SHORT
RANGE TRANSIT PLAN
1) Amend the Riverside Transit Agency’s (RTA) Fiscal Year (FY) 2020/21 Short-
Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to include the Meals on Wheels program in the
Operating Budget; and
2) Approve an allocation of $175,000 of 2009 Measure A Western County
specialized transit funding for the Meals on Wheels program.
8S. FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN UPDATES AND TRANSIT
FUNDING ALLOCATIONS
1) Approve the Fiscal Years 2021/22 – FY 2023/24 Draft Short Range Transit
Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning (Banning), Beaumont (Beaumont),
Corona (Corona), and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA);
Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the
Commission’s FY 2021/22 – 2025/26 SRTP for the Rail and Vanpool
Programs;
2) Approve Fiscal Year 2021/22 Transit Operator Funding Allocations of
2009 Measure A, Local Transportation Funds (LTF), State Transit Assistance
(STA), and State of Good Repair (SGR) for Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and
Riverside; PVVTA; RTA; SunLine; and the Commission’s Rail and Vanpool
Programs aggregating $107,217,986;
3) Adopt Resolution No. 21-008, “Resolution of the Riverside County
Transportation Commission to Allocate Local Transportation Funds and
State Transit Assistance Funds For the Fiscal Year 2021/22”; and
4) Direct staff to add the federally funded and regionally significant projects
into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP).
8T. FISCAL YEARS 2021/22 – 2025/26 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THE LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM
Approve the Fiscal Years 2021/22 – 2025/26 Measure A Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plans (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted by the
participating agencies.
11
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 12
8U. FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY
FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUEST
1) Authorize payment of the $2,350/month maximum subsidy per buspool
for the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022, to the existing Riverside I
buspool; and
2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting
requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments.
9. APPROVAL OF METROLINK OPERATING AND CAPITAL SUBSIDIES FOR FISCAL YEAR
2021/22 AND RELATED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager, expressed appreciation to RCTC’s Metrolink Board
Representatives that have done a fantastic job during a very challenging year. He then
presented the annual Metrolink Budget update, highlighting the following areas: RCTC &
Metrolink; FY 21 highlights; ridership decline by Metrolink Line; COVID-19 recap; ridership
recovery scenarios December 2020 update; FY 22 highlight goals; and financial impact.
Commissioner Hoffman expressed appreciation for the optimism on getting the ridership
back up and expressed caution that everything he reads says it is going to be slow for
people to go back to their offices. He suggested when these budgets are being done that
it may not be done in 12 months, it may be a prolonged time as people get back on their
trains heading from Riverside County to Orange County and Los Angeles County as this
new normal and they should look at this as a long-term investment.
Commissioner Berkson stated as one of the Metrolink representatives for RCTC he
wanted to provide some thoughts on this issue with Metrolink. He explained the idea in
concept of Metrolink is to get vehicles off the road and reduce emissions and they do that
very well with the new Tier 4 Locomotives. There are 40 units total that have been
delivered and are now at Metrolink, the last unit should be in revenue service in the next
month or two. Commissioner Berkson stated Metrolink almost daily looks at the number
of passengers on every train and there is a new part of the App that allows people to see
how many people are on a train to decide if they want to ride that train or wait for another
one. The hardest challenge aside from the pandemic this last year was the unfortunate
news that Stephanie Wiggins, Metrolink’s CEO, left Metrolink as well as the Board
Secretary and moved on to LA Metro. He explained as Sheldon Peterson mentioned, they
are in the application process for Metrolink’s new CEO and the beginning of July there will
be a closed session meeting for interviews of the top contenders. Commissioner Berkson
expressed hopefully they can find somebody that will be able to carry the torch of Ms.
Wiggins, as she made major changes in her year and a half. He wanted to bring up these
points to let everybody know that does not have all that insight that the four
representatives representing RCTC as Metrolink Board Members have.
12
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 13
Commissioner Lisa Middleton concurred with Commissioner Berkson’s comments and
stated as a new alternate to the Metrolink Board she expressed appreciation to
Commissioners Berkson and Spiegel who are RCTC’s voting representatives and they have
been outstanding in their representation of the County. She referred to Commissioner
Hoffman’s comment about raising the issue of how long it is going to take before
individuals start returning to the workplace and the kind of numbers that were historic
and stated the future of rail in Southern California needs to be not solely linked to
transportation of individuals to and from work. They need to start thinking about how
they use the rail network as an opportunity for individuals to be used when they are
recreating and going to various events and suggested that their system today should be
set up in the way that they need to do to be able to be a transportation network that gets
people from Riverside County to Orange, Los Angeles, and San Diego Counties and in the
other directions as well that people go to on the weekends. Commissioner Middleton
referred to the traffic in Corona and stated how much of that traffic could be improved if
more individuals could ride the train to the beaches and other events they are going to.
Commissioner Speake expressed appreciation for the money that RCTC is putting into this
as it is very important and noted just based on the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and the
way SB 743 is going to affect transportation agencies and the counties in California in how
they build projects. He referred to Commissioners Berkson’s and Middleton’s comments
and stated light rail is the future and they need to push hard to identify where to find
funding, put these plans in place, and in places they do not currently have it. He stated
Commissioner Middleton made a great point about how many cars they can get off the
road and he always goes back to talking to one of the transportation engineers that told
him that each lane of traffic on the freeway holds about 2,200 cars an hour before it
breaks down. Commissioner Speake noted if they start allocating those 2,200 people
onto trains, they are going to need more trains and have more trains in places that they
do not currently have them. He explained I-15 has received a lot of attention lately and
in discussions with Caltrans Headquarters with the VMT folks and the representatives’
office for SB 743 telling them that having to mitigate large amount of mitigation millions
and millions of VMT on I-15 is literally almost impossible. He stated if they were going to
build just an additional general-purpose lane or the proposed southern extension that
was going to go all the way to Temecula there is anywhere from 250 million to 300 million
VMT. He stated the person he was speaking to at the time said well where is the public
transportation and he replied if he wants to go to Temecula he has to get in his car as
there are no choices, there is no bus or train, and in fact they have an idea but there is no
plan. He suggested at the way the state and the federal government are moving on
infrastructure they need to have something to expand upon what they are doing.
Commissioner Speake express they have done great things so far, the history RCTC has
with LA Metro and working together with them, they need find ways to expand those
kinds of systems. He concurred with Commissioner Hoffman that it will take some time,
but it is going to come back. He stated having this conversation with the state as well,
when are they going to start telling people that the freeways are not going to get better.
He stated as Anne Mayer noted many times, they cannot build their way out of this and
13
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 14
suggested the public needs to realize that it is not going to get better and they need to
have other options whether it is living where you work, working where you live, and
looking at public transportation. He expressed they are not going to see additional large-
scale improvements, general purpose lanes, or toll lanes and try to figure out what the
VMT mitigation is going to be as they have an uphill battle and the sooner they can get
ahead of this and try to find ways to plan and then find money the better it is going to be
for everyone.
Commissioner Jeff Hewitt stated he is the biggest skeptic here on anything rail obviously
with what happened with COVID-19 they were starting to get a few riders, but then it
really went back. He explained being in Chicago this last weekend, he rode the L from
O’hare to downtown, there were 17 stops, and he bought a $5.00 ticket as Uber would
have cost $70.00 and taken longer due to the congestion on the freeway. He concurred
with Commissioner Middleton’s comments and stated they need to look at more than
just commuters going into work and look at all the opportunities not just in Coachella
Valley, but all over Southern California. Also, connecting to airports, the ports, and
everything else better than they already do. He realizes Chicago Transit Authority is a
little bit different then LA Metro or Metrolink, but he sees some hope and he had a really
good experience, but they need to work on getting the real skeptics like him.
Commissioner Russell Betts stated to make the rail attractive for people they have to
know that they can get where they are going to go once they have gotten on the train and
gotten off it, for example to a store and to do it easily. He explained spending 10 years in
China, and he drove maybe 1,200 miles in a car during that time and everywhere he went
it was by a taxi or a train, every method of transportation possible. He even had gone 90
miles from the city of Wushe down to Shanghai to buy a computer and he explained how
simple it was by taking a taxi, a train, a bus, and the subway to get his computer and it
was all because he knew he could make that trip. He suggested as they start to look at
rail, they have to look at not just getting somebody from Desert Hot Springs to Corona,
but from Corona to their actual destination that they want to go and if they do not put
that piece of puzzle in place the public will say they need their car. He concurred with
Commissioner Middleton’s comments that they cannot just rely on it for work they have
to start relying on it for these other purposes if very important.
Marven Norman expressed appreciation for having the ability to comment, he concurred
with several of the Commissioners’ comments, and stated it is good that RCTC is standing
strong with Metrolink. As it has been noted the train has to move to be more reliable and
accessible for people and he is aware that RCTC is working on several projects to improve
that. He mentioned Metrolink’s Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE)
program, which will also if it is fully funded and implemented move forward in that
direction by putting up trains that is a half hour frequency on some lines in Riverside
County were in 15 minute frequencies and at that rate it gets to be a useful system and
people will not have to look at a schedule because they know there is going to be a train
coming up every few minutes. The other thing it will take and there is research showing
14
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 15
that when people have access to the train especially at the ends by biking and walking
and other micro mobility options when those options are easy in many cases it is as fast
as driving. He is aware RCTC has their traffic relief plan from last year and looked at some
of those bike projects and RCTC is working on the Santa Ana River Trail but suggested
making more of an effort with Metrolink to develop a first mile last mile plan that focuses
on getting people an easy trip down to the train station. He stated in previous years RCTC
had several studies on expanding rail service down to Temecula both down the I-15 and
I-215 corridors and both of those are also potential alignments for the California high-
speed rail (HSR). He suggested given that those are potential alignments it would be
useful to start getting the professional authority to move the planning efforts for phase 2
forward so that if RCTC is making investments in those corridors it can be investments
that are going to be enhanced by HSR.
Commissioner Molina stated in the city of Calimesa another council member and herself
have for the last five years been taking it upon themselves just to what everybody is saying
it is all about connections. She explained they take and offer trainings to individuals, they
travel with them to the transportation hubs, teach them how to use their smart phone,
how to load Apps, how to check when their train or bus is coming, and how to keep an
additional charger for their phone. Some of the Metrolink trains have charging centers
and some of them do not, the bathrooms are clean, they actually show them how to make
connections and using the bus system, and how to get back. Commissioner Molina stated
going in one direction there are all the cost savings of going from bus to Metrolink, to
Metro rail and even the downtown buses that go in the same direction they go to all the
little cultural communities in L.A., to Dodger games, the music center, and then how to
get back. The city of Calimesa just lost the transportation line through their city so they
will just have to amend indicating where the bus lines are that connect to the hubs, but it
is something that is simple and if they manage their time, it is an option not to take a car.
She asked if anybody wants to have information on what they do she can provide it but it
works, and it is getting people out of their car and into mass transportation.
Anne Mayer stated this is a terrific conversation and that is why staff wanted to bring this
as discussion item to this Commission. She congratulated and expressed how proud they
are of Stephanie Wiggins for becoming the Chief Executive Officer of LA Metro, it is a huge
accomplishment. Ms. Wiggins is now leading one of the largest transportation agencies
in the country and they are always proud of their RCTC alumnus Stephanie Wiggins. She
explained Ms. Wiggins and the Metrolink Board did such a great job over the past year of
managing through this crisis as it was mentioned it is going to take a couple of years to
come back, but there is a concentrated effort not only amongst the Metrolink staff but
also the staff from the member agencies who do everything they can to get Metrolink
back on track and to bring riders back in a way they feel safe. Also, to ensure to continue
to provide transportation options for people. Ms. Mayer stated everything the
Commissioners and Mr. Norman have said about the future of rail is really important and
they are currently updating the Rail Strategic Plan and will bring it back to the Commission
at the end of this year for further discussion. As always in Riverside County rail and
15
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 16
expansion of rail whether it is about the expansion out to Hemet-San Jacinto, which RCTC
bought all that right of way a couple of decades ago, or it is out to the I-15 and I-215
corridors, or out to the Coachella Valley there has always been keen interest in it. It is
simply a matter of money and it can be done, and they are positioned well, the Coachella
Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail study that is out now they could not be at a more perfect
point in time in terms of seeking funding for the next phases of that. The Metrolink Capital
program called SCORE which has additional capital investments will really make a
difference, but there is the operating money needed too. There are a lot of plans in place
and the timing seems to be looking good for future investments of other people’s money,
but expressed it is really a matter of where they can make strategic investments and how
can they try to make sure that rail service is a viable option for the residents of Riverside
County whether it be for commuting or for personal use. It is exciting because now it the
time to start having conversations about rail and they will have to be really aggressive and
really engaged in conversations about rail funding at both the state and federal level.
Chair Harnik stated undoubtedly this is going take a shift in thinking, if they keep doing
the same things it is not going to take on the popularity as it has. She concurred with
what Commissioner Molina had said about introducing people to the process and
providing them with a level of comfort.
At this time, Commissioner Jeremy Smith left the meeting.
M/S/C (Reed/Benoit) to:
1) Receive and file a report on highlights from the Southern California
Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) services;
2) Approve the Fiscal Year 2021/22 SCRRA operating and capital budget,
which results in an operating subsidy of $21,474,584 and capital subsidy
of $4,293,459 for the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director to finalize and execute Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) No. 21-25-093-00 with SCRRA regarding annual
funding, including subrecipient matters related to pass-through of
federal funding.
At this time, Commissioner Jeffries left the meeting.
10. FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 (SB 821) CALL
FOR PROJECTS – PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
Jenny Chan, Planning and Programming Manager, provided an overview for the
FY 2021/22 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Call for Projects and then a map
was displayed that shows the locations of the 15 projects being recommended.
16
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 17
M/S/C (Zimmerman/Fitzpatrick) to approve the Fiscal Year 2021/22
Transportation Development Act Article 3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
program (SB 821) recommended project allocations in the amount of
$4,327,472.
11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION
There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar.
12. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
12A. Commissioner Speake expressed that himself on behalf of his colleagues, the city
of Corona they do not condone and completely condemn any threats of violence
in any way and they are always looking for solutions, which needs to be conveyed
to the Commission and staff. He referred to Council Member Steiner’s comments
and reiterated that frustrations with the tolling exit at Cajalco and the associated
chaos has reached a fever pitch as the Commissioners heard. There are backups
on the I-15 regularly backed up for about two miles usually between the Magnolia
and Ontario exits. The commute time usually begins around 4:00 p.m. and it ends
around 7:00 p.m. with associated back up on city streets as commuters from the
south try to get home. He stated the new condition with the toll lanes going
through the commuter time begins at 3:00 p.m. and it frequently extends passed
8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday with backup going regularly back to the SR-91
interchange. Lately, as Council Member Steiner noted they are now seeing insane
amounts of traffic on the weekends but with the added bonus they also have a
pretty large toll. He explained this was not expected as it was brought up at the
last Commission meeting RCTC built half a project because of funding and the
traffic modeling showed this shift in bottleneck would get shifted back to Cajalco
just as the partially built SR-91 Project, those issues now are being slowly
corrected with the budget the Commission just adopted. He stated lots of projects
will help fill those gaps with just a couple things outstanding, the eastbound
SR-91 between SR-241 and SR-71 and the improvements that will be east of I-15
on SR-91. He expressed appreciation to the Commissioners for continuing to
invest in the corridor not as a representative for the city of Corona, but as a
Commissioner for all RCTC and a commuter and a resident that wants to see the
mobility of Western Riverside County work for everyone. The $2 billion invested
in these corridors was not for the city of Corona it is for the region as these two
corridors bring billions and billions of dollars in salaries and revenues to Riverside
County, not just Corona. He had requested city staff to work on getting some
videos and heat maps together to show how the issues they have on I-15 have
impacted city streets and some solutions. He stated being solution oriented back
before he was elected with a small group of people. He understands these
questions cannot be addressed today and asked about the toll policy is there a
limit on how high the tolls can go on the southbound I-15, and how is RCTC
17
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 18
communicating this to the public. He used an $11.00 toll or a $7.00 toll between
Ontario and Cajalco as an example and asked what people understand that to
mean. Commissioner Speake noted bringing this up in past meetings about a
potential bill on the truth in tolling that tells people how much money they are
going to save, how much money they are going to spend, how much time they are
saving and be honest with people. He stated as part of the SR-91 Project there
was a discussion about what level could tolls rise in order to divert people out of
the toll lanes and he thought it was around $3.00 to $4.00 per mile that once it hit
that range it did not matter anymore people were going to go into the toll lanes
regardless of the price, and they have certainly exceeded that on the I-15. He
requested to discuss placing a limit on the tolls in this section as he does not want
to eliminate them as they are part of the toll policy and they should have those
but find a way to limit those. He expressed they have created this with the project
that they built, and they need to find a way that they can still capture revenue to
push these projects forward but at the same time be honest with people. One of
the questions he asked Anne Mayer before was have they compared the travel
times and heat maps of pre-project opening to what was projected in the original
traffic study and it is not the same and it would be good to share this information
with the public. He noted it goes back to Chair Harnik’s comments about
communicating these facts as they are important. They know that this project was
extensively modeled, they have this data, and they need to share it, but he knows
they did not study what the impacts would be to city and county streets in this
area. Commissioner Speake stated Commissioners Jeffries, Spiegel, and himself
receive a lot of calls and the more information they can give them the better. He
suggested he will engage people on social media to lower the temperature and
provide those facts of what RCTC is doing. He is aware that RCTC and staff is
working very diligently on finding some alternative striping plans and finding some
way to mitigate this. He asked about the status of the I-15 Corridor Operations
project, how soon, what can they do, what are the sticky points, is there a
legislative fix to exempt this project to get this to move forward. He tells people
it is funded, it is in planning, it was approved last year, but the big question is
when. He would prefer to find a way to show that they are pushing this forward
as fast as they can and whatever options that they can. As part of the I-15 Ad Hoc
Committee he had asked for a future conversation about discussing the rail fixes
that they are talking about as the world is changing, they need to change and be
nimble and be able to identify how to best find money at the state and federal
level. He suggested to push some of these alternative projects to take advantage
of what SB 743 has given them and what federal transportation bills that are
coming down the pike and the way the federal government are looking at
greenhouse gas emissions, and how they handle and mitigation those. He
reiterated they need to be honest to people and tell them that the toll lanes are a
temporary fix unless people change their behavior, getting on alternative
transportation or finding work closer to home it is not going to get better. He
stated working with Riverside County EDA and the city to try to find some pilot
18
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 19
projects to do some recruiting although that is not part of this Commission,
however the economic development portion of getting people to work where they
live will lessen the impacts on transportation and they still should be a part of the
discussion. Lastly, he had sent an email to the I-15 Ad Hoc Committee Members
that the city of Corona back in 2019 adopted a resolution and RCTC took this
forward to Caltrans to address the operational lane drop issues on the I-15 and he
expressed appreciation to Michael Beauchamp, Caltrans District 8 and Caltrans for
taking that forward and studying it and agreeing that there were issues and there
were things that can be done as part of the SHOPP project and there was a corridor
operations study they did back in 2020. He asked for help from the I-15 Ad Hoc
Committee Members and RCTC to help push this forward to make it become a
project. Caltrans has identified it as a need but without having a project they
cannot find funding and the state has put $2 billion into the SHOPP program for
this coming fiscal year. The sooner they can identify this as a project and get
Caltrans to help fund this project and he is not suggesting that RCTC fund this
because the $2 billion and soon to be $2.5 billion that the taxpayers in Riverside
County have paid for improvements in this area is enough and it is time for the
state and some others to pitch in to get these things done.
Commissioner Hoffman concurred with Commissioner Speake’s comments as he
too heard Council Member Steiner’s comments about Corona and his fellow
council members to the south of Norco as he is aware of the traffic issues. He
noted on Sunday for example it took him an hour to drive on the I-15 to go 18
miles south from Norco to Indian Truck Trail and that bottleneck that they have
created and the short-tempered drivers getting off those routes it makes it even
worse. It took him two and a half hours to drive to Temecula on Friday and he left
mid-day or late morning, so it is a mess. He does not agree with trying to change
the toll, but they do need to make some corrections and some adjustments to it,
because it is not done. He noted in the budget RCTC plans on getting $21 million
in funds from that for next year’s budget from the I-15 toll and those monies they
need to pay for their expenses, but he concurred with Commissioner Speake at
what cost. These people are upset his folks in his community are upset because
of the delays trying to get up and down I-15 and suggested they need to think
about their transportation methods and how to get there. He grew up in Riverside
County and in the 1950’s there was 200,000 people in Riverside County today
there is over 2.5 million people. He expressed they have created this mess
essentially making things grow fast so now they have to pay for that and if it means
putting trains in or some sort of a rail system, they are behind it and it should have
been years ago.
Commissioner Steven Hernandez noted it seems like this is the time where
everybody is asking for a project and he clarified that they have a lot of priorities
as well in the east end and it is important that they balance their priorities. Every
single one of their areas needs things and their communities are frustrated and
19
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 20
asking to get it fixed and they have waited patiently. He stated certainly Corona
has gotten over $2 billion worth of project improvements and there are a lot of
areas as well that need them, how they balance things, look at how to create more
equity throughout their county, and not necessarily ship people out of the county
but keep them in is what he is interested in discussing.
12B. Anne Mayer announced:
• Last Friday the House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee Chair Peter DeFazio released his five-year $547 billion
Surface Transportation Reauthorization bill called the Investing in
a New Vision for the Environment and Surface Transportation in
America (INVEST in America Act). The act directs federal
investments in roads, bridges, transit, and rail. Included in the bill
language is increasing the competitiveness of grade separations for
federal funding, ensuring RCTC and other self-help counties in
California are eligible to compete for new grant funding programs.
There were a lot of ideas and suggestions being made today all of
which will require a great deal of money so RCTC needs every
penny they can get from as many of the other sources as possible,
because RCTC does not have a budget for that.
• Previously they had reported to the Commission that they have
been advocating for earmark funding and submitted federal
earmark requests totaling $50.5 million and on Monday they found
out that two of their requests were added to the INVEST Act. $20
million for the I-15 Next project, which is the extension of the
express lanes north and a partnership project with the County of
San Bernardino that was submitted by Representative Mark
Takano; and $3 million for the I-15 Corridor Operations project that
was submitted by Congressman Ken Calvert. There are still several
steps to go before this funding is approved but they are one step
closer and are very appreciative that these projects made it into
the first draft of the INVEST Act. She provided the other three
Riverside County projects and the dollar amounts. She
congratulated the teams that worked hard to help get these
projects in the first draft and their goal is to try to make sure that
money stays in the Act all the way to the end until it gets
authorized.
12C. Chair Harnik expressed believing that there is not anyone who
participates in these meetings who condones any violence or
anger, but as leaders it is incumbent upon them that they have to
be honest with their communities. They have to encourage calm
20
Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes
June 9, 2021
Page 21
and civility so they can get to the solutions. She stated they all
come to this meeting to do their best work representing for all of
their communities and she expressed appreciation for their time
and contributions today.
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation
Commission, Chair Harnik adjourned the meeting at 11:18 a.m. The next Commission
meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 14, 2021, via Zoom.
Respectfully submitted,
Lisa Mobley
Clerk of the Board
21
AGENDA ITEM 6B
Agenda Item 6B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: July 14, 2021
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee
David Knudsen, Interim External Affairs Director
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on state and federal legislation.
DISCUSSION:
State Update
On June 14, 2021, the State Legislature passed a $267 billion state budget, meeting the
constitutionally mandated timeline but still needing to work with Governor Newsom on a final
budget deal to determine program impacts and the final specific allocations for many budget
items. The California Constitution requires that lawmakers pass a budget by June 15, 2021 or face
pay suspensions. The Legislature can continue negotiating with the Governor through the July 1
start of the fiscal year.
The transportation elements in the budget—passed by legislators along party lines—in many
ways reflect priorities in Governor’s budget proposal, including:
• $1 billion to deliver critical projects for completion by 2028 for the Olympic Games.
• $1 billion for transit and rail projects statewide that improve rail and transit connectivity
between state and regional/local services.
• $500 million to advance projects that increase active transportation.
• $500 million to support critical safety improvements throughout the state.
• $2 billion in special funds and federal funds for streets, roads, and highway projects.
• $400 million for a State and Local Transportation Climate Adaptation program.
The Governor unveiled his revised budget proposal of $267.8 billion on May 14, 2021, which was
an increase from his initial $227 billion proposal in January. This proposed spending level was a
result of the unprecedented $75.7 billion surplus and $27 billion in federal relief approved in
March.
22
Agenda Item 6B
Federal Update
House Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bill in Key Committee
On June 10, 2021 the House Transportation and Infrastructure (T&I) Committee passed its
version of the surface transportation reauthorization legislation, the INVEST in America Act. RCTC
was successful in ensuring the inclusion of language in this year’s version of the legislation that
makes RCTC eligible to compete for discretionary grants in areas such as carbon reduction,
resiliency, and freight movement and mitigation.
In addition to the proposed eligibility language being included in the bill, there are also two
earmarks included at the request of RCTC:
• $20 million for the I-15 NEXT project, submitted by Representative Mark Takano
• $3 million for I-15 Corridor Operations Project, submitted by Representative Ken Calvert
The full House of Representatives is scheduled to consider the legislation the week of
June 28, 2021.
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation (Commerce) Committee released its surface
transportation reauthorization bill in mid-June. Recall that there are three Committees in the
Senate with jurisdiction over surface transportation policy. The Senate Commerce Committee
handles safety, commuter rail, and Amtrak policy and funding issues. RCTC is closely monitoring
this legislation for grant program funding opportunities.
RCTC legislative affairs staff is working with Representative Dr. Raul Ruiz’s office on legislative
language that may help ensure eligibility for discretionary grant funding to advance the Coachella
Valley-San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor project.
Infrastructure Package Negotiations
The Biden Administration continues to negotiate with the Senate as it relates to a broad
infrastructure package. Discussions have shifted to a group of 10 bipartisan Senators. While few
details of any specific proposals have been made public, the goal is to develop a bipartisan
infrastructure package that can be advance through the regular legislative process.
H.R. 972 – The Western Riverside County Wildlife Refuge Bill
On February 12, 2021, Representative Ken Calvert introduced H.R. 972, a bill to establish the
Western Riverside County Wildlife Refuge. With Representative Mark Takano as an original
cosponsor of the bill, this bipartisan legislation creates the federal government's framework to
meet its obligations under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)
Implementing Agreement.
23
Agenda Item 6B
This legislation would:
• Establish the boundary for a new wildlife refuge;
• Allow for the immediate inclusion of non-federal conservation lands that have already
been acquired to meet the terms of the MSHCP;
• Provide certainty for development of the transportation infrastructure required to meet
the future needs of southern California;
• Create new public access and enhance recreation for the entire region; and
• Create a mechanism for federal agencies to inventory lands within the Refuge established
by this legislation to determine their suitability for inclusion.
The federal government was a principal partner in establishing the MSHCP and agreed to acquire
one-sixth of the Plan’s wildlife reserve acres. A wildlife refuge will enhance the partnership with
the federal government to meet and fulfill the shared vision of aligning environmental
conservation, infrastructure, and economic growth in western Riverside County. By establishing
the Wildlife Refuge, H.R. 972 will enable the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to fulfill its obligation
as a partner in the MSHCP.
Chair Jan Harnik signed a letter supporting H.R. 972 on June 11, 2021, based on the Commission’s
2021 adopted State and Federal Legislative Platform.
Supporting this legislation is in alignment with the adopted 2021 State and Federal Legislative
Platform, including:
Environment
• Support efforts or initiatives that expedite the approval of Habitat Conservation
Plans or Special Area Management Plans for transportation projects.
On June 15, 2021, Chair Harnik authored with the Western Riverside County Regional
Conservation Authority Chair Natasha Johnson and Representative Ken Calvert a Press-Enterprise
Op-Ed, which communicated the importance of establishing a wildlife refuge in Western
Riverside County and its contribution to transportation infrastructure development in the region.
Attachments:
1) Legislative Matrix
2) H.R. 972 Support Letter
3) Western Riverside County Wildlife Refuge Press-Enterprise Op-Ed
24
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION – JUNE 2021
Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption
AB 1499 (Daly) Removes the January 1, 2024 sunset date for Department of
Transportation and regional transportation agencies to use the design-
build procurement method for transportation projects in California.
Referred to Assembly
Transportation Committee
June 16, 2021
SUPPORT April 14, 2021
SB 623 (Newman) Clarifies existing law to ensure toll operators statewide can improve
service to customers and enforce toll policies while increasing privacy
protections for the use of personally identifiable information (PII).
Hearing canceled at the
request of author
April 26, 2021
SUPPORT
Staff action based on platform
April 5, 2021
SB261 (Allen) This bill would require that the sustainable communities strategy be
developed to additionally achieve greenhouse gas emission reduction
targets for the automobile and light truck sector for 2045 and 2050 and
vehicle miles traveled reduction targets for 2035, 2045, and 2050
established by the board. The bill would make various conforming
changes to integrate those additional targets into regional transportation
plans.
Senate Transportation
Committee - hearing
postponed by committee.
April 27, 2021
OPPOSE May 12, 2021
FederalHR 972 (Calvert) This bill establishes the Western Riverside County Wildlife Refuge which
would provide certainty for development of the transportation
infrastructure required to meet the future needs of southern California.
Referred to the
Subcommittee on Water,
Oceans, and Wildlife
March 8, 2021
SUPPORT
Staff action based on platform
June 11, 2021
ATTACHMENT 1
25
June 11, 2021
The Honorable Ken Calvert
U.S. House of Representatives
2205 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Re: Support H.R. 972
Dear Representative Calvert:
The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) supports H.R. 972, which establishes the Western Riverside
County Wildlife Refuge (Wildlife Refuge). In January 2021, RCTC became the managing agency for the Western Riverside
County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). The RCA was formed with the establishment of the western Riverside
County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), a 500,000-acre wildlife preserve that provides habitat for
146 species of plants and animals, in 2004. H.R. 972 is a welcome and critical addition to our land acquisition efforts to
complete the MSHCP.
As one of the nation’s largest habitat conservation plans, the MSHCP strengthens the sustainability and quality of life in
western Riverside County by providing a streamlined process that permits development projects, while protecting natural
resources and improving air quality. The MSHCP provides Endangered Species Act coverage under a single permit for
critical wildlife areas, which helps accelerate the construction of freeway and road projects. The MSHCP also helps to
expedite commercial, industrial, and residential development to support population and economic growth in our region.
A wildlife refuge in western Riverside County will enhance our partnership with the federal government to meet and
fulfill the shared vision of aligning environmental conservation, infrastructure, and economic growth. By establishing the
Wildlife Refuge, H.R. 972 will enable the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to fulfill its obligation as a partner in the MSHCP.
Thank you for your leadership in sponsoring this bill. Should you have any questions, please reach out to Anne Mayer,
Executive Director, at (951) 787-7141.
Sincerely,
Jan Harnik
Chair
CC: The Honorable Dianne Feinstein, United States Senate
The Honorable Alex Padilla, United States Senate
ATTACHMENT 2
26
Copyright (c)2021 Orange County Register, Edition 6/16/2021. Please read our Privacy Policy and User Agreement. Please review new arbitration language her
Wednesday, 06/16/2021 Page .A13
ATTACHMENT 3
27
AGENDA ITEM 6C
Agenda Item 6C
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: July 14, 2021
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee
Jillian Guizado, Planning and Programming Director
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: County of Riverside Funding Request for Construction of Jurupa Road Grade
Separation Project
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve programming $25 million of 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial
(MARA) funds for the city of Jurupa Valley’s Jurupa Road Grade Separation project;
2) Approve Agreement No. 21-72-121-00 between the Commission and the County of
Riverside (County) as the lead agency for the programming of $25 million of MARA for the
construction phase of the Jurupa Road Grade Separation project; and
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to finalize and
execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The Commission’s 2017 Companion Study to the 2012 Grade Separation Priority Update Study
identifies three priority grade separations on critical urban freight corridors: McKinley Road
(Corona), Jurupa Road (Jurupa Valley), and Third Street (Riverside). At the time, the Jurupa Road
grade separation had no funding identified. A few months after the 2017 Companion Study was
completed, the California State Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 132, providing $108.4 million
to deliver the Jurupa Road Grade Separation project. SB 132 includes a statutory provision that
the funds must be encumbered by June 30, 2023.
The Commission has a history of providing discretionary funding to priority grade separation
projects in the county. In 2001, the Commission approved a funding commitment to priority
grade separation projects in Riverside County by providing a 10 percent local share match to the
California Public Utilities Commission grade separation funding program. In 2007, the
Commission committed to providing 25% of federal formula funds to priority grade separation
projects. The Commission also approved Alameda Corridor East grade separation projects as
eligible projects for 2009 Measure A Western County Economic Development funds. In the same
28
Agenda Item 6C
year, Proposition 1B was approved by California voters which included a program to improve
trade corridors which offered grade separation project funding.
DISCUSSION:
The County is the lead agency on the Jurupa Road Grade Separation project for the city of Jurupa
Valley. Since SB 132’s passage in 2017, it has been working to deliver the project. Coordination
with the Union Pacific Railroad has been challenging, particularly over the past 15 months during
the COVID-19 pandemic. To keep the project moving forward, the County developed a phased
approach to construction which allowed it to advertise the construction contract while still
finalizing the design and right of way. On May 19, 2021, the County opened construction bids.
The low bid is favorable and very close to the engineer’s estimate. Once the construction cost
became known, the County developed an updated project cost estimate which indicates a
funding shortfall of $25,000,000.
On June 16, 2021, the County submitted a letter (Attachment 2) to the Commission regarding the
shortfall and requested financial assistance to fully fund the project. Commission staff conducted
an analysis of available fund types and determined that the only fund type eligible and available
given the various project details and circumstances is MARA. Staff recommends programming
$25 million of available MARA funds to fully fund the Jurupa Road Grade Separation project and
entering into agreement 21-72-121-00 for purposes of providing funding for the project on a
reimbursable basis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The County will prioritize expenditure of the SB 132 funds, after which any additional funding
needed to complete the project, up to $25 million, would be paid for with available MARA funds
on a reimbursable basis. The Commission will retain any cost savings on the project.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2022/23 Amount: $25,000,000
Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County
Regional Arterial funds Budget Adjustment: N/A
GL/Project Accounting No.: 663041 81301 00000 0000 266 31 81301
Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/17/2021
Attachments:
1) Project Location Map
2) June 16, 2021 Letter from County of Riverside
29
Agenda Item 6C
Approved by the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee on
June 28, 2021
In Favor: 11 Abstain: 1 No: 0
30
ATTACHMENT 1
31
ATTACHMENT 2
32
33
AGENDA ITEM 6D
Agenda Item 6D
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: July 14, 2021
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee
Jenny Chan, Planning and Programming Manager
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Agreement for Transit-Oriented Communities Strategic Plan
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-65-043-00 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. to develop a
transit-oriented communities strategic plan for an 18-month base period with two
additional six-month optional terms in an amount of $924,674, plus a contingency
amount of $25,326, for a total amount not to exceed $950,000;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to finalize and
execute the agreement, including option terms, on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work up to the
total not to exceed amount as required for these services.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In June 2020, the Federal Transit Administration awarded the Commission $700,000 in grant
funding, with a $250,000 local match commitment, to develop the Transit-Oriented Communities
Strategic Plan (TOC Strategic Plan) as part of the Fiscal Year 2019 Pilot Program for Transit-
Oriented Development Planning grant program. The grant enables the Commission to work with
community members, private developers and staff from the cities of Perris, Moreno Valley,
Riverside, and Corona and the March Joint Powers Authority (March JPA) to create a strategic
plan for transit-oriented development (TOD) within the five-mile radius of the eight 91/Perris
Valley Line Metrolink stations in Riverside County. The TOC Strategic Plan seeks to reduce or
eliminate impediments to TOD by identifying regulatory actions and funding strategies to
facilitate TOCs. The plan will provide a regional planning framework that builds upon existing
regional or local jurisdictions’ TOD-friendly planning efforts and provide guidance to accelerate
public and private investment within the five-mile radius of each station. The goals of the plan
are to support local economic development, increase Metrolink ridership, and decrease auto
trips which improves local and regional traffic congestion.
34
Agenda Item 6D
DISCUSSION:
Key activities to be completed during the study include:
- Prepare a Commuter Rail TOD Best Practices Memo specific to the Inland Empire. The
memo will provide case studies and lessons learned regarding TOD projects, including
recent housing developments at Riverside-La Sierra, Riverside Downtown, and Corona-
North Main stations.
- Develop station area profiles summarizing the existing conditions for the eight Metrolink
stations. Profiles will include information such as: existing planning and development
policy, land use, zoning, socio-economic trends, existing mobility options, and real estate
market conditions.
- Implement a robust multi-lingual public engagement plan to collect community and
stakeholder feedback.
- Evaluate and define station typology that is sensitive to community character and needs
and market conditions. Develop policy recommendations surrounding zoning, density,
housing, and first/last mile connections.
- Identify short-, mid- and long-range actions that will remove development barriers and
promote TOD and define the roles and responsibilities for the Commission, cities, and
March JPA.
- Update the Commission’s Joint Development Guidelines based on findings from the TOC
Strategic Plan.
Procurement Process
Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for
this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with
price and other factors considered. Non-price factors include elements such as qualifications of
firm and personnel and understanding and approach for a TOC Strategic Plan as set forth under
the terms of Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 21-65-043-00.
RFP No. 21-65-043-00 for the TOC Strategic Plan was released by staff on March 18, 2021. The
RFP was posted on the Commission’s PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the
Commission’s website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 437 firms, 58 of which are
located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, 53 firms downloaded the RFP and 3 of
these firms are located in Riverside County. Staff responded to all questions submitted by
potential proposers prior to the April 6, 2021 clarification deadline date. Seven firms – Dudek
(Encinitas), Gruen Associates (Los Angeles), Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. (Pittsburgh, PA),
HDR Engineering, Inc. (Riverside), Perkins & Will (San Francisco), Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
(Los Angeles), and SWA (Laguna Beach) – submitted responsive proposals prior to the 2:00 p.m.
submittal deadline on April 27, 2021. Utilizing the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP, all firms
were evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission, Riverside
Transit Agency and city of Corona staff.
35
Agenda Item 6D
Based on the evaluation committee’s assessment of the written proposals and pursuant to the
terms of the RFP, the evaluation committee shortlisted and invited three firms to the interview
phase of the evaluation and selection process. Interviews of the shortlisted firms – HDR
Engineering, Inc., Perkins & Will, and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. – were conducted on
May 26, 2021.
As a result of the completion of the evaluation process, the evaluation committee recommends
contract award to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. to develop the TOC Strategic Plan for an 18-
month base period with two additional six-month optional terms to extend the agreement, as
this firm earned the highest total evaluation score. A summary of the proposed costs submitted
with the written proposals and the total evaluation score rankings following the final evaluation
are summarized below:
Firm Price Overall Ranking
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. $899,105 1
HDR Engineering, Inc. $903,247 2
Perkins & Will $901,634 3
Gruen Associates $790,963 4
Dudek $878,532 5
Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. $892,074 6
SWA $906,009 7
The RFP issued by the Commission only intended to solicit public feedback through the
establishment of a community advisory committee. However, Stantec’s proposal included
additional outreach events for the greater community at large in a virtual environment. In light
of the recent lifting of various health orders related to COVID-19, staff determined that a hybrid
approach providing for both in person and virtual community outreach events would be the most
accessible and beneficial for the project. To accommodate the revised approach for outreach,
additional scope and budget were added to this task in negotiating the final agreement, including
an optional outreach task.
Accordingly, staff recommends the award of an agreement for the TOC Strategic Plan for an
18-month base period with two additional 6-month optional terms to Stantec Consulting
Services, Inc. for a total amount of $924,674, plus a contingency amount of $25,326, for a total
amount not to exceed $950,000. Contingency is recommended as part of this contract to provide
flexibility to add minor additional scope that was not identified in the agreement. The
Commission’s standard form professional services agreement will be entered into with Stantec
Consulting Services, Inc. subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director, pursuant to
legal counsel review. Staff also recommends authorization for the Chair or Executive Director to
finalize and execute the agreement, including option terms and contingency work for the TOC
Strategic Plan.
36
Agenda Item 6D
Next Steps
Upon completion of the key activities previously listed, Commission staff will return to the
Commission with a presentation of the completed TOC Strategic Plan. The presentation will
include a description of the preferred TOC typology for each station as vetted by the community
and stakeholders. Alongside the preferred TOC typology, staff will highlight the necessary policy
changes that the Commission, cities, and March JPA would need to consider and adopt to achieve
the preferred TOC typology.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project has a budget of $950,000 for up to a thirty-month period. Funding for this project is
comprised of a $700,000 grant from FTA. Local match of $250,000 is funded from State
Transportation Improvement Program Planning, Programming and Monitoring (STIP PPM) funds.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes
N/A Year: FY 2021/22
FY 2022/23+ Amount: $598,720
$351,280
Source of Funds:
FTA FY 2019 Pilot Program for Transit-
Oriented Development Planning and
STIP PPM funds
Budget Adjustment: No
N/A
GL/Project Accounting No.: 002326 81501 00000 0000 106 65 81501
Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/18/2021
Attachment: Draft Agreement No. 21-65-043-00 with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Approved by the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee on
June 28, 2021
In Favor: 12 Abstain: 0 No: 0
37
1
Agreement No. 21-65-043-00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES STRATEGIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
(FTA FUNDED)
WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
Parties and Date.
This Agreement is made and entered into this ___ day of _______, 2021, by
and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the
Commission") and STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. ("Consultant"), a
CORPORATION. The Commission and Consultant are sometimes referred to herein
individually as “Party”, and collectively as the “Parties”.
Recitals.
A. On November 8, 1988 the Voters of Riverside County approved Measure A
authorizing the collection of a one-half percent (1/2 %) retail transactions and use tax (the
"tax") to fund transportation programs and improvements within the County of Riverside,
and adopting the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Plan (the "Plan").
B. Pursuant to Public Utility Code Sections 240000 et seq., the Commission is
authorized to allocate the proceeds of the Tax in furtherance of the Plan.
C. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved an extension
of the Measure A tax for an additional thirty (30) years for the continued funding of
transportation and improvements within the County of Riverside.
D. A source of funding for payment for professional services under this
Agreement in support of development of the Transit-Oriented Communities Strategic Plan
(the “Project”) may be funds from the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”).
E. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of
certain professional planning, zoning, and outreach services for development of the Project,
as required by the Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing the foregoing services to public
clients, is licensed in the State of California (if necessary), and is familiar with the plans of
the Commission.
Terms.
1. General Scope of Services. Consultant shall furnish all technical and
professional services, including labor, material, equipment, transportation, supervision and
38
2
expertise, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the
professional planning, zoning, and outreach services for development of the Transit-
Oriented Communities Strategic Plan ("Services"). The Services are more fully set forth in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be
subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules
and regulations.
2. Term.
2.1 This Agreement shall commence on the date first set forth above and
shall continue in effect for eighteen months (18) months (“Term”). The Commission shall
have the option, in its sole discretion, to extend the Term for two (2) additional six (6)
months periods, with prior written notice to the Consultant.
2.2 Consultant is advised that any recommendation for contract award is
not binding on Commission until this Agreement is fully executed and approved by the
Commission.
2.3 This Agreement shall remain in effect until the date set forth above,
unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services
within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and
deadlines. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in
effect following the termination of this Agreement.
3. Commission's Contract Administrator. The Commission hereby designates
the Commission's Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its Contract
Administrator for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission’s Contract
Administrator"). Commission’s Contract Administrator shall have the authority to act on
behalf of the Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Commission’s Contract
Administrator shall also review and give approval, as needed, to the details of Consultant's
work as it progresses. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person
other than the Commission’s Contract Administrator or his or her designee.
4. Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Adam Maleitzke
to act as its Representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant’s
Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to act on behalf of
Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall
supervise and direct the Services, using his or her professional skill and attention, and shall
be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the
satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant
shall work closely and cooperate fully with Commission’s Contract Administrator and any
other agencies which may have jurisdiction over, or an interest in, the Services.
Consultant's Representative shall be available to the Commission staff at all reasonable
times. Any substitution in Consultant's Representative shall be approved in writing by
Commission’s Contract Administrator.
39
3
5. Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to the
Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this
Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may
substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval by the
Commission. In the event that the Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the
substitution of the key personnel, the Commission shall be entitled to terminate this
Agreement for cause, pursuant to the provisions herein. The key personnel for
performance of this Agreement are: Adam Maleitzke, Project Manager; Andrew Irvine,
Principal-In-Charge; Rhonda Bell, Existing Conditions Lead; Craig Sklenar, Station Area
Visioning and TOC Strategies Lead; Craig Lewis, Implementation Lead.
6. Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant represents and maintains that it is
skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform all Services, duties and obligations
required by this Agreement to fully and adequately complete the Project. Consultant shall
perform the Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards
generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the
State of California. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have
sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Consultant further
represents and warrants to the Commission that its employees and subcontractors have all
licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required
to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained
throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and
expense and without reimbursement from the Commission, any services necessary to
correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the
standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for
all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this
Agreement arising from the Consultant’s errors and omissions. Any employee of
Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the Commission to be
uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a
threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform
the Services in a manner acceptable to the Commission, shall be promptly removed from
the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services
or to work on the Project.
7. Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or
under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, methods and details of
performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission
retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee, agent or
representative of the Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or
different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel
performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be
under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries
and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services
and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations
respecting such personnel, including but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax
withholdings, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation
insurance.
40
4
8. Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously,
within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the schedule for the Services set
forth in Exhibit “B” (“Schedule of Services”). Consultant represents that it has the
professional and technical personnel to perform the Services in conformance with such
conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the
Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of
Commission’s Contract Administrator, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of
anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.
8.1 Modification of the Schedule. Consultant shall regularly report to the
Commission, through correspondence or progress reports, its progress in providing
required Services within the scheduled time periods. Commission shall be promptly
informed of all anticipated delays. In the event that Consultant determines that a schedule
modification is necessary, Consultant shall promptly submit a revised Schedule of Services
for approval by Commission’s Contract Administrator.
8.2 Trend Meetings. Consultant shall conduct trend meetings with the
Commission’s Contract Administrator and other interested parties, as requested by the
Commission, as may be mutually scheduled by the Parties at a standard day and time.
These trend meetings will encompass focused and informal discussions concerning scope,
schedule, and current progress of Services, relevant cost issues, and future Project
objectives. Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation and distribution of meeting
agendas to be received by the Commission and other attendees no later than three (3)
working days prior to the meeting.
8.3 Progress Reports. As part of its monthly invoice, Consultant shall
submit a progress report, in a form determined by the Commission, which will indicate the
progress achieved during the previous month in relation to the Schedule of Services.
Submission of such progress report by Consultant shall be a condition precedent to receipt
of payment from the Commission for each monthly invoice submitted.
9. Delay in Performance.
9.1 Excusable Delays. Should Consultant be delayed or prevented from
the timely performance of any act or Services required by the terms of the Agreement by
reason of acts of God or of the public enemy, acts or omissions of the Commission or
other governmental agencies in either their sovereign or contractual capacities, fires,
floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes or unusually severe
weather, performance of such act shall be excused for the period of such delay.
9.2 Written Notice. If Consultant believes it is entitled to an extension of
time due to conditions set forth in subsection 9.1, Consultant shall provide written notice to
the Commission within seven (7) working days from the time Consultant knows, or
reasonably should have known, that performance of the Services will be delayed due to
such conditions. Failure of Consultant to provide such timely notice shall constitute a
waiver by Consultant of any right to an excusable delay in time of performance.
41
5
9.3 Mutual Agreement. Performance of any Services under this
Agreement may be delayed upon mutual agreement of the Parties. Upon such
agreement, Consultant's Schedule of Services shall be extended as necessary by the
Commission. Consultant shall take all reasonable steps to minimize delay in completion,
and additional costs, resulting from any such extension.
10. Preliminary Review of Work. All reports, working papers, and similar work
products prepared for submission in the course of providing Services under this Agreement
shall be submitted to the Commission’s Contract Administrator in draft form, and the
Commission may require revisions of such drafts prior to formal submission and approval.
In the event that Commission’s Contract Administrator, in his or her sole discretion,
determines the formally submitted work product to be not in accordance with the standard
of care established under this Agreement, Commission’s Contract Administrator may
require Consultant to revise and resubmit the work at no cost to the Commission.
11. Appearance at Hearings. If and when required by the Commission,
Consultant shall render assistance at public hearings or other meetings related to the
Project or necessary to the performance of the Services. However, Consultant shall not be
required to, and will not, render any decision, interpretation or recommendation regarding
questions of a legal nature or which may be construed as constituting a legal opinion.
12. Opportunity to Cure; Inspection of Work. Commission may provide
Consultant an opportunity to cure, at Consultant's expense, all errors and omissions which
may be disclosed during Project implementation. Should Consultant fail to make such
correction in a timely manner, such correction may be made by the Commission, and the
cost thereof charged to Consultant. Consultant shall allow the Commission’s Contract
Administrator and Caltrans to inspect or review Consultant's work in progress at any
reasonable time.
13. Final Acceptance. Upon determination by the Commission that Consultant
has satisfactorily completed the Services required under this Agreement and within the
term set forth herein the Commission shall give Consultant a written Notice of Final
Acceptance. Upon receipt of such notice, Consultant shall incur no further costs
hereunder, unless otherwise specified in the Notice of Final Acceptance. Consultant may
request issuance of a Notice of Final Acceptance when, in its opinion, it has satisfactorily
completed all Services required under the terms of this Agreement. In the event copyrights
are permitted under this Agreement, then in connection with Federal funding, it is hereby
acknowledged and agreed that the United States Department of Transportation shall have
the royalty-free non-exclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use,
and to authorize others to use, the work for governmental purposes.
14. Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in
compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner
affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA
requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. For example, and not by way of
limitation, Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all
implementing regulations, design standards, specifications, previous commitments that
42
6
must be incorporated in the design of the Project, and administrative controls including
those of the United States Department of Transportation. Compliance with Federal
procedures may include completion of the applicable environmental documents and
approved by the United States Department of Transportation. For example, and not by way
of limitation, a signed Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, or published
Record of Decision may be required to be approved and/or completed by the United States
Department of Transportation. For Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws
and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it
to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to the
Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom.
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers,
employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this
Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply
with such laws, rules or regulations.
15. Fees and Payment.
15.1 Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized
reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in
Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The overhead rates
included in the attached Exhibit “C” shall be fixed for the term of this Agreement, and shall
not be subject to adjustment, unless required by the applicable funding source. The total
compensation shall not exceed Nine Hundred Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred
Seventy-Four Dollars ($924,674) without written approval of Commission's Executive
Director (“Total Compensation”). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and
if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
15.2 Any payments to Consultant for travel and subsistence expenses
must be authorized in writing by Commission, and shall not exceed rates authorized to be
paid exempt non-represented State employees under current State Department of
Personnel Administration (DPA) rules, unless otherwise authorized by Commission. If the
rates invoiced are in excess of those authorized DPA rates, and Commission has not
otherwise approved said rates, then Consultant is responsible for the cost difference and
any overpayments shall be reimbursed to the Commission on demand.
15.3 When milestone cost estimates are included in Exhibit “C” Consultant
shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from the Contract
Administrator before exceeding such cost estimate.
15.4 Payments shall be made monthly in arrears based on Services
provided and allowable incurred costs. If Consultant fails to submit the required deliverable
items according to the Schedule of Services, Commission shall have the right to delay the
applicable payment or terminate this Agreement in accordance with the termination
provisions of this Agreement.
15.5 No payment shall be made prior to approval of any Services, nor for
any Services performed prior to approval of this Agreement.
43
7
15.6 Consultant shall be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will
permit upon receipt by Commission’s Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in
triplicate. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance
of work for which Consultant is billing. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each
milestone and each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the
approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this Agreement number and project title. Final
invoice must contain the final cost and all credits due Commission including any
equipment purchased under the Equipment Purchase provisions of this Agreement. The
final invoice should be submitted within 60 calendar days after completion of Consultant’s
work. Invoices shall be mailed to Commission’s Contract Administrator at the following
address:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Attention: Accounts Payable
P.O. 12008
Riverside, CA 92502
15.7 Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless
authorized in writing by the Commission’s Contract Administrator.
15.8 All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain the above
provisions.
16. Disputes.
16.1 Any dispute, other than audit, concerning a question of fact arising
under this Agreement that is not disposed of by mutual agreement of the Parties shall be
decided by a committee consisting of RCTC’s Contract Administrator and the Director of
Capital Projects, who may consider written or verbal information submitted by Consultant.
16.2 Not later than 30 days after completion of all Services under this
Agreement, Consultant may request review by the Commission’s Executive Director of
unresolved claims or disputes, other than audit. The request for review will be submitted in
writing.
16.3 Neither the pendency of a dispute, nor its consideration by the
committee will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement.
17. Termination.
17.1 Commission reserves the right to terminate this Agreement for any or
no reason, in whole or in part, upon written notice to Consultant stating the effective date
of termination.
17.2 Commission may terminate this Agreement with Consultant should
Consultant fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner
44
8
herein provided. In the event of such termination, Commission may proceed with the
Services in any manner deemed proper by Commission. If Commission terminates this
Agreement with Consultant, Commission shall pay Consultant the sum due to Consultant
under this Agreement for Services completed and accepted prior to termination, unless the
cost of completion to Commission exceeds the funds remaining in the Agreement. In such
case, the overage shall be deducted from any sum due Consultant under this Agreement
and the balance, if any, shall be paid to Consultant upon demand.
17.3 In addition to the above, payment upon termination shall include a
prorated amount of profit, if applicable, but no amount shall be paid for anticipated profit on
unperformed Services. Consultant shall provide documentation deemed adequate by
Commission’s Contract Administrator to show the Services actually completed by
Consultant prior to the effective date of termination. This Agreement shall terminate on the
effective date of the Notice of Termination
17.4 Upon receipt of the written Notice of Termination, Consultant shall
discontinue all affected Services as directed in the Notice or as otherwise provided herein,
and deliver to the Commission all Documents and Data, as defined in this Agreement, as
may have been prepared or accumulated by Consultant in performance of the Services,
whether completed or in progress.
17.5 In addition to the above, Consultant shall be liable to the Commission
for any reasonable additional costs incurred by the Commission to revise work for which
the Commission has compensated Consultant under this Agreement, but which the
Commission has determined in its sole discretion needs to be revised, in part or whole, to
complete the Project because it did not meet the standard of care established in this
Agreement. Termination of this Agreement for cause may be considered by the
Commission in determining whether to enter into future agreements with Consultant.
17.6 The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in
addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Agreement.
17.7 Consultant, in executing this Agreement, shall be deemed to have
waived any and all claims for damages which may otherwise arise from the Commission's
termination of this Agreement, for convenience or cause, as provided in this Section.
17.8 Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.
18. Cost Principles and Administrative Requirements.
18.1 Consultant agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures,
48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., shall be
used to determine the cost allowability of individual items.
18.2 Consultant also agrees to comply with federal procedures in
accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles,
and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
45
9
18.3 Any costs for which payment has been made to CONSULTANT that
are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200 and 48
CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., are subject
to repayment by Consultant to Commission.
18.4 All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain the above
provisions.
19. Retention of Records/Audit. For the purpose of determining compliance with,
as applicable, 2 CFR Part 200, Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California
Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable and other matters
connected with the performance of this Agreement pursuant to Government Code 8546.7;
Consultant, subconsultants, and Commission shall maintain and make available for
inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence
pertaining to the performance of this Agreement, including but not limited to, the costs of
administering this Agreement. All parties shall make such materials available at their
respective offices at all reasonable times during the Agreement period and for three years
from the date of final payment under this Agreement. The State, State Auditor,
Commission, or any duly authorized representative of the State or Federal Government
shall have access to any books, records, and documents of Consultant and it’s certified
public accountants (CPA) work papers that are pertinent to this Agreement and, if
applicable, indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and
copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall
contain this provision.
23.1 Accounting System. Consultant and its subcontractors shall establish
and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate
expenditures by line item for the Services. The accounting system of Consultant and its
subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable
the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for
reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices.
20. Audit Review Procedures.
20.1 Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or
post audit of this Agreement that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by
Commission’s Chief Financial Officer.
20.2 Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report,
Consultant may request a review by Commission’s Chief Financial Officer of unresolved
audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing.
20.3 Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by
Commission shall excuse Consultant from full and timely performance, in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement.
21. Subcontracting.
46
10
21.1 Nothing contained in this Agreement or otherwise, shall create any
contractual relation between Commission and any subconsultant(s), and no subcontract
shall relieve Consultant of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. Consultant agrees
to be as fully responsible to Commission for the acts and omissions of its subconsultant(s)
and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by any of them as it is for the acts and
omissions of persons directly employed by Consultant. Consultant’s obligation to pay its
subconsultant(s) is an independent obligation from Commission’s obligation to make
payments to the Consultant.
21.2 Consultant shall perform the Services contemplated with resources
available within its own organization and no portion of the Services pertinent to this
Agreement shall be subcontracted without written authorization by Commission’s Contract
Administrator, except that, which is expressly identified in the approved Cost Proposal.
21.3 Consultant shall pay its subconsultants within ten (10) calendar days
from receipt of each payment made to Consultant by Commission.
21.4 Any subcontract in excess of $25,000 entered into as a result of this
Agreement shall contain all the provisions stipulated in this Agreement to be applicable to
subconsultants.
21.5 Any substitution of subconsultant(s) must be approved in writing by
Commission’s Contract Administrator prior to the start of work by the subconsultant(s).
21.6 Exhibit “C” may set forth the rates at which each subconsultant shall
bill the Consultant for Services and that are subject to reimbursement by the Commission
to Consultant. The subconsultant rate schedules and cost proposals contained herein are
for accounting purposes only.
22. Equipment Purchase
22.1 Prior authorization, in writing, by Commission’s Contract Administrator
shall be required before Consultant enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or
subcontract for supplies, equipment, or services. Consultant shall provide an evaluation of
the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs.
22.2 For purchase of any item, service or consulting work not covered in
the Cost Proposal and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization, in writing, by Commission’s
Contract Administrator is required. Three competitive quotations must be submitted with
the request for such purchase, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified.
22.3 Any equipment purchased as a result of this Agreement is subject to
the following: Consultant shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property.
Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an
acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is
sold or traded in, Commission shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of
this Agreement, or if this Agreement is terminated, Consultant may either keep the
equipment and credit Commission in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such
47
11
equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance with
established Commission procedures; and credit Commission in an amount equal to the
sales price. If Consultant elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be
determined at Consultant’s expense, on the basis of a competent independent appraisal of
such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by
Commission and Consultant. If Consultant determines to sell the equipment, the terms
and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by Commission. 2 CFR, Part
200 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market
value greater than $5,000 is credited to the Project.
22.4 All subcontracts in excess $25,000 shall contain the above provisions.
23. Labor Code Requirements.
23.1 Prevailing Wages.
(a) Consultant shall comply with the State of California’s General
Prevailing Wage Rate requirements in accordance with California Labor Code, Section
1770, and all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the Services.
(b) Any subcontract entered into as a result of this Agreement, if for
more than $25,000 for public works construction or more than $15,000 for the alteration,
demolition, repair, or maintenance of public works, shall contain all of the provisions of this
Section.
(c) When prevailing wages apply to the Services described in the
Scope of Services, transportation and subsistence costs shall be reimbursed at the
minimum rates set by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as outlined in the
applicable Prevailing Wage Determination. See http://www.dir.ca.gov.
(d) Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at
commencement of this Agreement are on file at the Commission’s offices. Consultant shall
make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type
of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and
shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the project site.
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers,
employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or
interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage
Laws.
23.2 DIR Registration. If the Services are being performed as part of an
applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections
1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the
Department of Industrial Relations. If applicable, Consultant shall maintain registration for
the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants. This Project may
also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial
Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable
registration and labor compliance requirements.
48
12
23.3 Eight-Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor
Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day’s work, and the time of service of
any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any
one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for
overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in
excess of eight hours per day (“Eight-Hour Law”), unless Consultant or the Services are
not subject to the Eight-Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty,
$50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any
sub-consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or
permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one
calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the
California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight-Hour
Law.
23.4 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the
employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor
Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified
employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the
ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice
shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or
trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to
which he or she is registered.
If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any
subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall
apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate
approving Consultant or any sub-consultant for the employment and training of apprentices.
Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub-consultant shall employ the
number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer
the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder.
The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with
provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California
Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant.
24. Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality.
24.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and
perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub-license any and all
copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates,
materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of
expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise
recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by
Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”).
49
13
Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that
Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the
subcontractor prepares under this Agreement.
Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right
to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant
makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were
prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the
Commission.
Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents
& Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this
Agreement shall be at Commission’s sole risk.
24.2 Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all
right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary
rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer
programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works
of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to,
physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media
(“Intellectual Property”) prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this
Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on
behalf of Consultant under this Agreement.
The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in
Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for
wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant,
and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written
assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon
request of Commission.
Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate
written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to
the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following
termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above-referenced Intellectual
Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission.
All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the
Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the
copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall
continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and
stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has
the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as
provided herein.
Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and
perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub-license any and all Intellectual Property
50
14
otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative,
collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement.
24.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans,
procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written
information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by
Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be
used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor
shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the
performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is
otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related
industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or
insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the
Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other
similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission.
24.4 Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and
hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents
free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any
alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any
other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by
Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept
specified or depicted.
25. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall
defend, indemnify and hold Commission, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers,
employees, consultants, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims,
demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or
equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, inverse condemnation, and any
claims related to property acquisition and relocation rules or failure to detect or abate
hazardous materials, which are brought by a third party, and which , in any manner arise
out of or are incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of
Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising
out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement,
including without limitation the payment of consequential damages, expert witness fees,
and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at
Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other
legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Commission,
Caltrans, and their directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or
volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be
rendered against Commission, Caltrans or their directors, officials, officers, employees,
consultants, agents, or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding.
Consultant shall reimburse Commission, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers,
employees, consultants, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and
costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by each of them in connection
therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to
51
15
indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Commission,
Caltrans or their directors, officials officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s Services are subject to Civil Code
Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code
Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence,
recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. Consultant’s obligations as set forth
in this Section 28 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.
26. Insurance.
26.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this
Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has
secured all insurance required under this Section, in a form and with insurance companies
acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to
commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this
Section.
26.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and
maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons
or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the
Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same
insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the
following minimum levels of coverage:
(a) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as
broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office
Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2)
Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001,
code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s
Liability: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(b) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits
no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with
general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required
occurrence limit. Limits may be achieved by any combination of primary and excess or
umbrella liability insurance; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily
injury and property damage. Limits may be achieved by any combination of primary and
excess or umbrella liability insurance; and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s
Liability: Workers’ Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of
California. Employer’s Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.
26.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and
require its sub-consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following
52
16
completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their
profession. For Consultant, such insurance shall be in an amount not less than
$1,000,000 per claim. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability
applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically
designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered
Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work
performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must
include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. Subconsultants of Consultant
shall obtain such insurance in an amount not less than $2,000,000 per claim.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Commission may consider written requests to lower or
dispense with the errors and omissions liability insurance requirement contained in this
Section for certain subconsultants of Consultant, on a case-by-case basis, depending on
the nature and scope of the Services to be provided by the subconsultant. Approval of
such request shall be in writing, signed by the Commission’s Contract Administrator.
26.4 Aircraft Liability Insurance. Prior to conducting any Services requiring
use of aircraft, Consultant shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and
maintained, aircraft liability insurance or equivalent form, with a single limit as shall be
required by the Commission. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and
non-owned aircraft and passengers, and shall name, or be endorsed to name, the
Commission, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as
additional insureds with respect to the Services or operations performed by or on behalf of
the Consultant.
26.5 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the
following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the
Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies:
(a) General Liability.
(i) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include
coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury;
(3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) aggregate
limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion
deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property
damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage.
(ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions
limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by
one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement.
(iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors,
officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20
10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage.
(iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be
“primary and non-contributory” and will not seek contribution from the Commission’s or
53
17
Caltrans’ insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or
endorsements providing the exact same coverage.
(b) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be
endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers,
employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the
ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased,
hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, Caltrans and
their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an
unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant’s scheduled underlying coverage.
Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, Caltrans and their
directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant’s
insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way.
(c) Workers’ Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage.
(i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions
of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured
against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with
the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before
commencing work under this Agreement.
(ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation
against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses
paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the
Consultant.
(d) All Coverages.
(i) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits
set forth hereunder.
(ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in
this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a
waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement
under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of
the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall
be available to the Commission, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, employees
and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for
coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this
Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance
policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater.
(iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may
be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or
excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage
shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission
54
18
(if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission’s own insurance or
self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess
policy shall be provided on a “following form” basis with coverage at least as broad as
provided on the underlying policy(ies).
(iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty
(30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement,
except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of
cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required
coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall
deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement
to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or
expiration.
(v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no
later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage
continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this
Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the
retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is
cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with
a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement.
(vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of
insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by
the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities
and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including
but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification.
(vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy
of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is
canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the
insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly
reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium
from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement.
The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance
policies in effect for the duration of the Project.
(viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials,
officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under
or by virtue of this Agreement.
26.6 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the
Commission does not approve the deductibles or self-insured retentions as presented,
Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer
shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the
Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant
55
19
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs,
claims and administrative and defense expense.
26.7 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with
a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and
satisfactory to the Commission.
26.8 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with
original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this
Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements
for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind
coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved
by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to
require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
26.9 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow
any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they
have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all
insurance required under this Section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance
provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the
Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement
providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may
approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or
subconsultants.
26.10 Other Insurance. At its option, the Commission may require such
additional coverage(s), limits and/or the reduction of deductibles or retentions it considers
reasonable and prudent based upon risk factors that may directly or indirectly impact the
Project. In retaining this option Commission does not warrant Consultant’s insurance
program to be adequate. Consultant shall have the right to purchase insurance in addition
to the insurance required in this Section.
27. Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or
damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all
times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees
appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be
performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A)
adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in
accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways,
scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures,
trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing
apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C)
adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.
Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 591 of the Vehicle Code, the Commission
has determined that the Project will contain areas that are open to public traffic. Consultant
56
20
shall comply with all of the requirements set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the
Vehicle Code. Consultant shall take all reasonably necessary precautions for safe
operation of its vehicles and the protection of the traveling public from injury and damage
from such vehicles.
28. Additional Work. Any work or activities that are in addition to, or otherwise
outside of, the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall only be
performed pursuant to a separate agreement between the parties. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Commission’s Executive Director may make a change to the Agreement,
other than a Cardinal Change. For purposes of this Agreement, a Cardinal Change is a
change which is “outside the scope” of the Agreement; in other words, work which should
not be regarded as having been fairly and reasonably within the contemplation of the
parties when the Agreement was entered into. An example of a change which is not a
Cardinal Change would be where, in a contract to construct a building there are many
changes in the materials used, but the size and layout of the building remains the same.
Cardinal Changes are not within the authority of this provision to order, and shall be
processed by the Commission as “sole source” procurements according to applicable law,
including the requirements of FTA Circular 4220.1F.
(a) In addition to the changes authorized above, a
modification which is signed by Consultant and the Commission’s Executive Director, other
than a Cardinal Change, may be made in order to: (1) make a negotiated equitable
adjustment to the Agreement price, delivery schedule and other terms resulting from the
issuance of a Change Order, (2) reflect definitive letter contracts, and (3) reflect other
agreements of the parties modifying the terms of this Agreement (“Bilateral Contract
Modification”).
(b) Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for any
change, without written authorization from the Commission’s Executive Director as set forth
herein. In the event such a change authorization is not issued and signed by the
Commission’s Executive Director, Consultant shall not provide such change.
29. Prohibited Interests.
29.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not
employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that
it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission shall have the right
to rescind this Agreement without liability.
29.2 Commission Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no
member, officer or employee of the Commission, during the term of his or her service with
57
21
the Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or
anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
29.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel
currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this
Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular
working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the
Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to
the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or
dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission,
is prohibited.
29.4 Covenant Against Contingent Fees. As required in connection with
federal funding, the Consultant warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit
or secure this Agreement, and that he/she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage
fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or
formation of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Commission
shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability pursuant to the terms
herein, or at its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or
otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift, or contingent fee.
29.5 Rebates, Kickbacks or Other Unlawful Consideration. Consultant
warrants that this Agreement was not obtained or secured through rebates kickbacks or
other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any Commission employee. For
breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right in its discretion; to
terminate this Agreement without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually
performed; or to deduct from the Agreement price; or otherwise recover the full amount of
such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration.
29.6 Covenant Against Expenditure of Commission, State or Federal
Funds for Lobbying. The Consultant certifies that to the best of his/ her knowledge and
belief no state, federal or local agency appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid
by or on behalf of the Consultant to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting
to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member of the State
Legislature or United States Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or
Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection
with the award of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, or
the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(a) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been
paid, or will be paid to any person for the purpose of influencing or attempting to influence
an officer or employee of any federal agency; a Member of Congress; an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in connection with this
58
22
Agreement, the Consultant shall complete and submit the attached Exhibit "G", Standard
Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with the attached
instructions.
(b) The Consultant's certification provided in this Section is a
material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this Agreement was
entered into, and is a prerequisite for entering into this Agreement pursuant to Section
1352, Title 31, US. Code. Failure to comply with the restrictions on expenditures, or the
disclosure and certification requirements set forth in Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code may
result in a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such
failure.
(c) The Consultant also agrees by signing this Agreement that
he/she shall require that the language set forth in this Section be included in all Consultant
subcontracts which exceed $100,000, and that all such subcontractors shall certify and
disclose accordingly.
29.7 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the
Commission, and shall obtain the Commission’s written consent, prior to accepting work to
assist with or participate in a third-party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding
against the Commission during the term of this Agreement.
30. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal
opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or
applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or
age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to
initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising,
layoff or termination.
31. Right to Employ Other Consultants. Commission reserves the right to employ
other consultants in connection with the Project.
32. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the
laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County.
33. Disputes; Attorneys' Fees.
33.1 Prior to commencing any action hereunder, the Parties shall attempt
in good faith to resolve any dispute arising between them. The pendency of a dispute
shall not excuse Consultant from full and timely performance of the Services.
33.2. If the Parties are unable to resolve a dispute after attempting in good
faith to do so, the Parties may seek any other available remedy to resolve the dispute. If
either Party commences an action against the other Party, either legal, administrative or
otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such
litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing Party reasonable attorneys'
fees and, all other costs of such actions.
59
23
34. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this
Agreement.
35. Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal
headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in
the construction or interpretation of any provision herein.
36. Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given
to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the
respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
CONSULTANT: COMMISSION:
Riverside County
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Transportation Commission
801 S. Figueroa Street, Ste. 300 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017 Riverside, CA 92501
Attn: Adam Maleitzke Attn: Executive Director
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight
(48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the
Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date
actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.
37. Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits
conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and
conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the
Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of
the Services.
38. Amendment or Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of
this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.
39. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations,
agreements or understandings.
40. Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid,
illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
41. Provisions Applicable When State Funds or Federal Funds Are Involved.
Since funding for the Services shall be provided, in whole or in part, from the FTA,
Consultant shall also fully and adequately comply with the provisions included in Exhibit “E”
(FTA Requirements) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
42. Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to
continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to,
60
24
the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, shall survive any such expiration or
termination.
43. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries
of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
44. Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is
aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every
employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-
insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such
provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
45. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which
shall constitute an original.
46. Signatures. A manually signed copy of this Agreement which is transmitted
by facsimile, email or other means of electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the
same legal effect as delivery of an original executed copy of this Agreement for all
purposes. This Agreement may be signed using an electronic signature.
47. Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court
order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately
provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall
not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided
as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the
subpoena or court order.
48. Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or
transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without
the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void,
and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason
of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
49. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors
and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written
consent of Commission.
50. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct
and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
51. No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict
compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a
waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any
rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or
relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
61
25
SIGNATURE PAGE
TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR
TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES STRATEGIC PLAN
DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES
(FTA FUNDED)
WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written
above.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
By:
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
Approved as to Form:
By:
Best, Best & Krieger LLP
General Counsel
CONSULTANT
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
By:
Signature
Name
Title
ATTEST:
By:
Its: __________________________
* A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers.
One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second
signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or
any assistant treasurer of such corporation.
If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to
RCTC.
62
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT "A"
STATEMENT OF SERVICES
63
DR
A
F
T
ISSUESSTANTEC’S APPROACH
Prepare joint development guidelines and
policy framework that are clear and relevant
to developers and help to streamline the
delivery of development projects on RCTC
land and implement TOCs
• Facilitate an implementation-focused approach that relies heavily on outreach and
coordination, including continued developer engagement, research, and coordination with
local jurisdictions to implement joint development and TOC
• Propose specific, near-term actions for RCTC and partner jurisdictions as part of a road map
for mobility, land use, and placemaking improvements that begin to change the development
trajectory for stations that are best positioned for TOCs in the next 5-10 years
Develop a corridor-wide vision and
station-specific TOC strategies that play to
each station's strengths and fosters
collaboration - not competition - among
jurisdictions, community groups, and other
stakeholders along the Metrolink 91/Perris
Valley Line corridor
• Foster a corridor-wide approach that identifies unique opportunities present in each station
area through the use of typologies, work directly with each jurisdiction to understand existing
efforts, visions, and develop a corridor-wide vision with other partners
• Utilize a station-specific approach for the TOC Typologies that builds on efforts already
working in the area, and develops targeted strategies to promote development in the eastern
part of the Riverside/Perris Valley Metrolink corridors
• Identify of key infrastructure, parking, and other projects that are needed to reposition less
TOC-friendly areas and make them attractive to investment
• Establish a corridor-wide board to share lessons learned, resources, and coordinate marketing
efforts to attract investment
Facilitate innovative virtual and in-person
public involvement to allow all stakeholders
to meaningfully participate in the process
• Leverage Stantec and outreach lead KPA's extensive network, developed through working with
RCTC and key stakeholders in Riverside County, to invite a wide variety of participants into the
planning process
• Utilize innovative virtual engagement platforms developed by the Stantec team, including
immersive virtual open house sessions, virtual town halls, and virtual design charrettes as
dictated by COVID-19 guidance
• Aim to hold in-person design workshops later in the process that enable participants who may
not have access to high-speed broadband to also participate in the process.
WORK PLAN
Task 1—Project Management
1.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT + QUALITY
ASSURANCE
Our reputation is built around integrity and a
commitment to doing things right. This commitment
shapes everything we do from our health and safety
culture to our professional excellence in project work,
to our responsibilities on projects within our
communities.
Stantec’s Project Management (PM) Framework
contains a mandatory list of ten tasks to be complied
with on all projects or contracts as required by our
ISO9001:2008 registered Quality Management System.
Specifically, the PM Framework mandates the
following quality assurance processes be completed
for all projects or contract assignments:
The Project Manager and ‘professionals-of-record’ (or
‘professionals with responsible charge’) are to conduct
and document in writing a final quality assurance
review of final documents prior to issuance. Where
applicable, conduct multi-disciplinary coordination
reviews between disciplines and sub-consultants. Keep
completed and signed-off checklists, document sets,
etc., in project files.
Final documents must have an independent review
conducted and signed by the independent reviewer
prior to issuance. This practice guide provides
additional guidance on the steps and documentation
required to comply with these requirements.
Stantec will work with RCTC to incorporate these
protocols into a Project Management Plan, as well as
the project charter, schedule, potential issues and
mitigation strategies, project management meetings,
and communication protocols.
1.2 DATA REQUEST MEMORANDUM
Stantec will issue a data request memorandum for
discussion during the kickoff meeting. We have found
that one of the major challenges for a project is not
collecting data early enough in the process to be able
to quickly develop the existing conditions analysis. We
have access to a wide variety of regional and national
data sources, but we will need to supplement our
analysis with parcel data, ridership data, existing plans,
policies and ordinances, existing first/last mile
infrastructure, traffic counts, and information on
RCTC-owned properties, among others. We anticipate
working with RCTC to disseminate the request to key
partners, including Metrolink, SCAG, corridor
jurisdictions and others as needed.
1.3 KICK-OFF MEETING
Upon contract execution, the Stantec team will
schedule a call to plan for the kickoff meeting. Topics
to be discussed include meeting participants, agenda,
branding and outreach strategy, and information
requests such as the Data Request Memorandum. The
kickoff meeting will be held either virtually using Mural,
an interactive collaboration platform, or in-person,
depending on State and local COVID-19 health
regulations at the time. Stantec will prepare meeting
agendas, materials, and follow up shortly after the
kickoff meeting with meeting notes.
1.4 MONTHLY COORDINATION MEETINGS,
INVOICING, + PROGRESS REPORTS
We will work with RCTC to schedule monthly project
management and coordination meetings to discuss
completed and upcoming milestones and address
project issues. We propose a total of 18 monthly
coordination calls, half of which will be held in-person.
In-person meetings will be scheduled during days when
other in-person events are held, such as the
Development Advisory Committee and Community
Advisory Committee. Agendas and meeting minutes
will be prepared by Stantec before and after each
meeting.
Prior to the coordination meetings, Stantec will issue
monthly invoices per the schedule identified in the
executed contract, along with a comprehensive
progress report that details progress towards meeting
key milestones, solutions to address problems that
may arise during the project, a preview of near-term
milestones, and other items.
For progress meetings and other virtual engagement, stantec
will utilize mural, an intuitive tool we have used successfully for
other projects to promote collaboration and brainstorming.
STANTEC'S URBAN PLACES22 of 3564
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
Task 2—Existing Conditions
2.1 STATION AREA PROFILES
Stantec and its key team members HR&A and KPA have
all worked on recent projects for RCTC and in Riverside
County, with a focus on cultivating transit-oriented
communities and improving mobility. Recent projects
including the SCAG HQTA program, which included a
station area plan for the Downtown Riverside station
that was developed in 2018 by project manager Adam
Maleitzke, demonstrate our on-the-ground knowledge
of the challenges facing Riverside County as RCTC and
local jurisdictions seek to accommodate anticipated
growth in a way that improves livability, affordability,
and offers a variety of amenities to residents and
workers.
Through our work, we have observed a number of key
differences among the eight 91 Line/Perris Valley
stations that will be evaluated through the TOC
Strategic Plan. We will work with RCTC to build upon
our team’s collective understanding of these issues to
identify challenges including land use and regulatory
barriers to TOC, historic low-density, auto-oriented
development patterns, gaps in the pedestrian and
bicyclist network, and current economic disincentives
to creating transit-oriented communities. Given our
existing base of knowledge, the Stantec team can
quickly and efficiently conduct a “deep-dive” into these
issues that will inform public outreach and messaging
and the development of the TOC typologies.
For each station area, we will prepare in-depth
memoranda to understand current conditions along the
corridor, organized around the topics of land use and
TOC, mobility, infrastructure, and public realm. With
this information, we will prepare a SWOT or barriers
and opportunities analysis to identify each station
area’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as readiness
for transit-oriented communities. The memoranda will
be summarized in a series of eight (8) concise, yet
highly illustrative station area profiles using high-
quality maps, imagery, graphics, tables, and other
visual devices. The goal is to provide an easily-
understood snapshot of each station area that can be
clearly communicated to the general public during
virtual and in-person engagement sessions.
Memoranda may be appended to the station profiles,
and ultimately the Strategic Plan, to allow stakeholders
to explore issues in further detail if they so choose.
Stantec will work with RCTC and the TAC to develop
the format, topics, and content of the final station area
profiles, but we anticipate the following sections will
be included:
1. Station Summary
2. Planning and Policy
3. Precedents and Best Practices
4. Land Use and TOC
5. Socio-Economic Profile
6. Mobility
7. Infrastructure
8. Public Realm
9. SWOT Analysis
More information on the content of the station area
profiles is described below.
2.1.1 LAND USE + TOC
Land use and regulatory provisions are often a
significant barrier for the development of TOCs.
Existing plans and policies often include policies that
mandate high parking requirements, propose low-
density building envelopes and auto-oriented uses, and
artificially limit the amount of development that is
permitted on a particular site. Upon receipt of
information solicited through the data request
memorandum, Stantec will evaluate General Plans,
Specific Plans, zoning ordinances, GIS information,
and other reports and data.
Specific topics that will be explored include:
• Major Activity Centers
• Existing Land Use and Zoning
• Existing policies related to land use, mobility, and
infrastructure
• Development Patterns and Typical Building
Products
• Character and form
• Density and Massing
• Parking
LRT station area parking, stormwater, and public realm
concepts by Adam Maleitzke, prior to joining Stantec.
23 of 3565
DR
A
F
T
2.1.2 MOBILITY, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PUBLIC
REALM
Along the 91/Perris Valley Line Corridors, there is a
strong desire for transit not only to spur development,
but to create those centers that a community can
organize itself around. At its best, transit orients; it
provides a center around which people and places
congregate. With high quality and visible transit
coming—now is the opportunity to leverage how
transit’s orientation will create connected places that
balances the needs of current residents, new
development opportunity, and continued economic
vitality. Successful TOD stations extend well into the
community. While transit provides mobility for people
and access to places, it is the stations that are the
front door. Transit historically connects neighborhood
centers and concentrations of destinations. These
neighborhood centers then MUST be self-sustaining
from a mobility perspective, functioning as the
multimodal center of each sub-community, while
directly connecting them to other corridor cities and
the greater Los Angeles region.
For this effort, the Stantec team will develop
multimodal connectivity plans for the Station areas.
These will ensure that stations are linked to the
surrounding neighborhood and adjacent transportation
network in seamless ways. To accomplish this, our
team will review ongoing design work and examine
existing desire lines and connectivity by mode at each
station areas.
As part of initial data collection, we will capture all
relevant existing transportation and public realm
assets as well as look at existing plans, proposed
network improvements and development already
underway. We will organize the latest transportation
observations and data relevant to the project’s goals,
including:
• Pedestrian connections showing where people
can comfortably walk or bike to the station today
and to high-ridership bus stop locations
• Safety data showing concentrations of crashes
using readily-available data
• Experiential data showing where potential
barriers such as long or vacant blocks, poorly lit
areas or traffic counts change along the corridor
and its cross streets
• Crossing bus service, stops and ridership,
including amenities
• Bicycle connections and parking showing
regional paths and local on-street facilities, as
well as bicycle share or large bicycle parking
facilities
• How well-utilized is on-(and off-) street parking—
particularly the lots owned by RCTC, and is there
a potential to use that space for something else?
Stantec's Smart Mobility team develops context-specific solutions to promote walking, cycling, and the use of new technologies
STANTEC'S URBAN PLACES24 of 3566
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
• Travel forecast data from RCTC's travel demand
model (RivTAM/RivCOM)
• Existing parks and open space
• Physical conditions of key mobility corridors
• General character and condition of building stock
• Others, as identified by RCTC and the
committees
Our team will collect and map this information for each
station area level to help inform the process. We
believe in the importance of moving this information
out of the conventional language of data and analysis
and into a broader discussion of transportation and
integration opportunities and trade-offs. From this, we
will perform a gap analysis to identify which station
areas lack sufficient connectivity and where that may
hamper development.
Defined station access typologies will inform this
analysis. The “area of influence” of stations will vary
based on local land use, area density, existing and
potential connectivity, gaps, barriers and other factors.
This connectivity is the glue that holds the transit and
land use factors together to create a more balanced
and accessible place at each station maximizing
benefits of each.
2.1.3 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AND REAL
ESTATE MARKET SCAN
Based on previous work experience in the cities of
Riverside, Corona, and other municipalities, Stantec
team member HR&A is familiar with real estate
markets throughout the Inland Empire. HR&A will
conduct a real estate market scan for sub-market
areas that will encompass the entirety of the 8 station
areas referenced in the RFP. An analysis of larger
sub-markets that surround station areas is useful for
understanding the market forces, trends, and
conditions that will influence the development
potential within the station areas. Further, other real
estate development activity that occurs within a
sub-market is likely to compete with any station area
developments for prospective users, tenants, or
homeowners. Using proprietary data sources, such as
CoStar and REIS, HR&A will evaluate each sub-market
area’s current performance of key land uses, including
multi-family residential, retail, industrial, and office
uses. Findings will be synthesized to highlight the
relative performance of each key land use as a
comparison with each of the other sub-market areas.
To develop an “on-the-ground” understanding of real
estate market performance, opportunities, and
challenges, HR&A will conduct up to twenty (20)
targeted, one-on-one interviews with local businesses
(or business organizations), community organizations,
developers, and brokers.
To begin understanding the most pertinent
opportunities and constraints of each station area,
HR&A will provide a high-level summary of key
demographic, socioeconomic, and real estate market
indicators for an area encompassing a half-mile radius
of each of the eight (8) station areas. Indicators to be
evaluated include median household income,
residential owner/renter split, age, average home price,
jobs per resident, and others. HR&A will also
disaggregate metrics to better understand
displacement risks and the economic inclusion by
race. Finally, HR&A summarize lessons learned in an
analysis of each station area’s strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats. Stantec will work with
HR&A to incorporate the summary into the overall
station area profile.
2.2 BEST PRACTICES REPORT
Stantec and HR&A regularly review transit-oriented
community and transit-oriented development best
practices across Southern California and the US. We
have explored the challenges that arise when
developing TOD projects in the Inland Empire through
our work on the SCAG/SBCTA ARRIVE Corridor and
SCAG HQTA Analysis projects. For the HQTA Analysis
project, our project manager Adam Maleitzke and
Judith Taylor of HR&A collectively developed in-depth
profiles of commuter station areas throughout the US
and Canada, as well as transit-oriented development
profiles of dozens of built projects. Each profile
includes critical metrics and information such as
floor-area ratio (FAR), number of units and square
footage of commercial retail and office space, parking
provided, innovative mobility solutions, public
amenities, and partnerships and key funding sources.
Paired with desktop research, transit agency outreach,
and developer interviews, we will develop a
memorandum that will provide up to five (5) case
studies and a summary of lessons learned that will
cover elements like zoning, multimodal standards,
affordable housing, gentrification mitigation,
innovative financing, first/last mile connections, value
capture strategies, and development of opportunity
zones. The carefully-selected case studies will be
tailored to the current conditions of the Inland Empire
as identified through the development of station area
profiles. In addition to the broader case studies, the
memo will further include an analysis of TOD
effectiveness of recent housing developments at
Riverside-La Sierra, Riverside-Downtown and Corona-
North Main areas.
25 of 3567
DR
A
F
T
2.3 RCTC JOINT DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW
HR&A is supporting LA Metro, the Orange County
Transportation Authority, and the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority in their creation and
implementation of Joint Development policies.
Building on this expertise, HR&A will consult external
and internal (HR&A) resources to scan precedent joint
development guidelines and effective partnership
approaches from transportation or other public
agencies for public- private development projects. The
HR&A team will conduct desktop research and
interviews with peer transit agencies for a selected set
of precedents. Three precedents will be selected, with
agreement from RCTC. The precedent research
screening criteria will particularly focus on 1) the
relevance of peer transit agency portfolio sites and
real estate market conditions to RCTC; 2) the
motivation/needs for the public agency to engage
private developer partner(s) (i.e. value maximization,
community benefits, capacity augmentation, etc.); and
3) specific examples of effective joint development
policies and development partnership models applied
at specific precedent sites, with the goal to provide the
best practices for RCTC to develop portfolio- wide
Joint Development Guidelines. Precedent research will
include an evaluation of peer transit agencies’ joint
development policies, with particular attention to their
approach to stakeholder coordination, crafting
site-specific objectives, and developer outreach
processes. Best practices will also include a thorough
review, and outreach addressing FTA expectations and
goals around joint development to ensure RCTC’s
overall joint development policies and objectives
position RCTC for maximum FTA support. The lessons
learned will directly inform recommendation for RCTC
Joint Development Guidelines in Task 5.2.
Task 3—Public Engagement
Stantec team member Katherine Padilla Associates
(KPA) will leverage their deep experience working with
communities in Riverside County, including RCTC and
local jurisdictions, to facilitate a robust and targeted
community and stakeholder outreach process. Our
team’s approach is based on the twin pillars of
authentic stakeholder engagement combined with
social marketing principles. We hold, that in working
with RCTC, it is the Stantec team’s responsibility to
first and foremost determine the needs, wants and
unique interests of communities surrounding each of
the eight station areas and to deliver solutions that
preserve the best of the communities and enhances
their well-being, while allowing the benefits of TOC
strategies to take root and flourish. Our approach
emphasizes two-way communication: 1) we conduct
analysis and provide information about challenges,
possibilities, opportunities and 2) most importantly, we
listen and provide space for all participants to share
their opinions. Relevant projects that KPA has helped
advance through strategic community relations
include:
• RCTC Strategic Assessment
• Metro East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor,
which began as an AA followed by EIS/EIR
• Metro East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Project
First-Last Mile Plan
• Metro Transit Supportive Communities Toolkit
• LA County Transit Oriented District Toolkit, which
involved the community East LA as a pilot study
• Metro East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor,
which began as an AA followed by EIS/EIR
• Metro East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Project
First-Last Mile Plan
• Metro Transit Supportive Communities Toolkit
• LA County Transit Oriented District Toolkit, which
involved the East LA community as a pilot study
Land use map and public realm plan prepared for the Northland Needham Street Master Plan, which successfully
converts an aging suburban strip mall into walkable, transit-supportive development.
STANTEC'S URBAN PLACES26 of 3568
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
• LA County Lambert Road Station First-Last Mile
Plan (for the proposed L Line)
• LA County Norwalk Blvd Station First Last Mile
Plan (for the proposed L Line)
• RCTC Strategic Assessment
KPA’s diverse team has extensive experience working
with community members from all walks of life, from
elected officials to people whose life experience may
not include civic engagement. We offer bilingual staff
to ensure all public notices and outreach will be
provided in both English and culturally sensitive
Spanish, and other languages as needed. Staff can
provide translation of all aspects of project reports,
meeting materials, social media and presentations.
Our ability to communicate fluidly in Spanish and
English, and visually through compelling graphic
design, will be helpful especially for facilitating
productive Community Advisory Committee (CAC)
meetings and community engagement. Lately, we have
successfully conducted a series of virtual stakeholder
group interviews in Spanish for the SCAG Wilmington
Freight Mitigation Study.
In terms of establishing and facilitating the Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) and Developers Advisory
Committee (DAC), our team will draw on our
understanding of how issues of land use, funding, and
other policies can influence TOC, ATP and first/last
mile planning. We use advanced facilitation and
mediation skills to develop innovative solutions and
avoid potential blind spots. We blend fresh ideas with
time-tested expertise in consensus building and
conflict resolution to strategically resolve complex,
multi-stakeholder, multi-agency challenges.
Even when in-person meetings are deemed safe, we
expect to continue to provide online meetings to allow
stakeholders to engage on projects in the way that’s
most convenient for them and will encourage high
participation in every TAC, DAC, and CAC meeting.
Stantec has the capability to develop a rich, interactive
platform for virtual open houses, which will
supplement the in-person workshops and stakeholder
meetings that will be held as State and local COVID-19
regulations permit. Stantec’s virtual engagement
platform has been used notably for planning projects
throughout the United States and Canada, including
Lebanon, TN, modeled after in-person meetings
through project boards, interactive surveys, pre-
recorded videos, and other graphically-rich content. As
needed, we will take a hybrid approach that will enable
community members to attend meetings in community
centers with large screens set up for viewing,
especially for those with no computer access in their
homes. We will meet community members where
they’re at, allow for feedback loops at key project
points and provide equitable solutions for public
engagement, including in-person community
workshops when possible.
TASK 3.1 PREPARE A COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT PLAN
KPA will develop a Community Engagement Plan
tailored for each of the eight station areas to engage
stakeholders in the planning process. We will begin by
conducting a stakeholder analysis for each of the
transit areas, identifying potential DAC and CAC
members and other key stakeholders as well as
targeted engagement strategies. Outreach and
engagement materials will be developed in English, in
Spanish and other languages as needed. We will
submit a Draft Plan for review and comment, and Final
Plan for staff approval, prior to implementation.
Design workshop for the county of Los Angeles TOD Design Guidelines project in East LA, facilitated by team
member KPA and project manager Adam Maleitzke, prior to joining Stantec.
27 of 3569
DR
A
F
T
3.2 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC)
Stantec and KPA will assist RCTC to form (1) Technical
Advisory Committee drawn from each of the affected
cities and relevant agencies, including the JPA, to
provide input on land use policies required for a
comprehensive TOC corridor approach. In its advisory
role, the TAC would also receive and consider DAC and
CAC input. For the purposes of this budget, it is
assumed that four (4) TAC meetings will be held.
3.3 DEVELOPER ADVISORY COMMITTEE (DAC)
Stantec and KPA will assist RCTC to form two (2)
Developer Advisory Committees, divided into two
regions, to advise and provide perspectives on current
barriers, proposed policy changes and financial
incentives. We will also assist with organizing
meetings, distributing meeting notifications, assisting
with agendas and presentation. KPA staff will attend
the meetings and provide meeting minutes. For the
purposes of this budget, it is assumed that two (2) of
two DACs meetings will be held, and that they will be
virtual. Assume there will be four (2) meetings total.
3.4 COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Stantec and KPA will work with RCTC staff to establish
four (4) Community Advisory Committees grouped by
geographic areas to explore issues and opportunities
for the eight station areas. KPA will assist the project
team in recruiting members, including producing
invitation letters/emails, with background info about
the Strategic Plan and its objectives as well as roles
and responsibilities of the CAC. For example, for the
CAC to provide input most successfully we may
suggest that two underlying principles be understood.
The first is that the CAC is not intended to be group
decision-makers who reach consensus, rather they are
a forum to deepen understanding of the issues and to
grasp the context and implications of choices; and
secondly, that the value of technical knowledge be
recognized and respected in the process. We further
suggest that the roles and responsibilities of the CAC
may include: Provide input to staff, technical team, and
the TAC; represent their communities’ interests as
much as possible; provide accurate information to
other stakeholders; seek balance between community
vision and values with technical challenges and
economic constraints. For the purposes of this budget,
it is assumed that there will be three (3) meetings of
each of the four (4) CAC groups for twelve (12)
meetings total.
TASK 3.5 HYBRID OPEN HOUSE
To gather input from the community-at-large, with the
team, Stantec will plan and host one in-person (1)
Open House to gather input from each of the eight
project areas. The Open House will offer break-out
sessions/on-line spaces for each of the eight areas.
Attendees will have the opportunity to learn about the
shared TOC goals, as well as provide input into their
unique communities ‘ challenges and opportunities.
KPA will develop positive, culturally sensitive branding
and key messages to emphasize benefits that matter
to the communities. KPA will take guidance from the
CACs to develop a shared vision and unique aspects
that we can promote in our messaging. As a leave-
behind for those who are not able to attend the live
virtual open house, Stantec will post interactive boards
to our online 3D Vista Platform. One (1) 3D Vista open
house will be posted following the facilitated virtual
open house meeting.
3.6 IN-PERSON DESIGN WORKSHOPS OR”HYBRID”
WORKSHOPS
When safe, with the team, KPA will plan and organize
three (3) in-person design workshops—one for each
Virtual open house using the 3D Vista Platform.
STANTEC'S URBAN PLACES28 of 3570
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
major section of the corridor—to be held in local
community gathering spaces. It is assumed the
content will be the same at all three meetings. These
meetings can also be held as a “hybrid,” with large
screens set up within a public space, such as local
community center, to provide convenient virtual
workshops while accommodating those who do not
have computer access in their homes. Additionally, up
to three (3) 3D Vista open house platforms will be
developed (see Task 3.5 for more information); one
platform will be developed for each major section of
the corridor. This will allow participants to engage with
the in-person design workshop content on their own.
KPA will work with CAC members and local advocacy
groups to publicize the TOC Strategic Plan and engage
CBOs to increase participation in workshops. KPA
recently established a model of CBO partnership with
two community-based organizations in our landmark
project, the Metro East San Fernando Valley Light Rail
Project, EIS/EIR and First-Last Mile Plan.
3.7 POP-UP EVENTS
Following the first hybrid open house event, Stantec
and KPA will organize and staff two (2) pop-up events
at local festivals, fairs, or other public events as
determined by RCTC and its community partners. Staff
will provide bi-lingual (English/Spanish) translation and
will answer questions about the vision, goals, and
process. Visitors will be invited to complete an online
survey, which will be developed by Stantec and KPA
using SurveyMonkey or a similar service.
3.8 MAILERS + COLLATERAL MATERIALS
KPA will develop distinctive branding, images, tagline,
key messages to support the social marketing aspects
necessary to build community understanding of the
TOC Strategic Plan and why it matters. We will create
bi-lingual mailers and collateral materials, and provide
bi-lingual, English/Spanish text, and other languages
as needed, and graphic design of eight (8) mailers and
two (2) fact sheets, especially to be distributed
electronically. All materials will be submitted for
approval prior to distribution.
3.9 SOCIAL MEDIA, WEBSITE, + PR
KPA will provide draft and final versions of up to six (6)
press releases (6), four (4) op-eds, and up to 50 social
media messages in English and Spanish. As directed,
KPA will work with RCTC’s Public Information Director
to determine distribution protocol. KPA will then
distribute as directed. KPA will contact 30 community-
based organizations and cities to ask for their
assistance in posting the messages to their websites,
social media sites, and other channels of distribution.
KPA will develop a distinctive project webpage,
assumed to link to RCTC’s website, and will provide
content for up to eight (8) pages. KPA will also
purchase advertising for social media posts.
3.10 FINAL OUTREACH SUMMARY
KPA will provide a written summary of all engagement
activities and the community input provided, key
themes and implications, as well as photos of events.
3.99 OPTIONAL TASK: SECOND HYBRID OPEN
HOUSE
Upon authorization to proceed by RCTC, Stantec and
KPA will host a second hybrid open house following
the release of the Preferred TOC Typology. See Task
3.5 for additional information on the activities included
with this optional event.
Task 4—Visioning
4.1 VISION, GOALS, + OBJECTIVES (MEMO)
In collaboration with RCTC and the committees, the
Stantec team will develop a vision statement, goals
and objectives that would apply corridor-wide. As with
all planning strategies a vision statement is meant to
be broad, aspirational and succinct, with goals and
objectives providing actions and key performance
indicators. Goals and Objectives for this project might
include station area specific direction based on unique
parameters.
Development of these important visioning elements
will be formed during the existing conditions and
kickoff conversation phases of the project. The
agreement to the vision, goals and objectives by RCTC
and the committees will be key to overall visioning
process, as they will serve as our guideposts and every
aspect will be evaluated as to how the decisions made
Our design charrettes build community support.
Project manager Adam Maleitzke (here);
Implementation lead, Craig Lewis (top middle)
29 of 3571
DR
A
F
T
are meeting or supporting the vision, goals and
objectives.
4.2 TOC ALTERNATIVES
The Stantec team will develop alternatives for each
station area that are rooted in station profiles, best
practices, and a comprehensive engagement program.
The alternatives will be vetted by RCTC, local
jurisdictions, the advisory committees, and the public
through the virtual and in-person outreach events
described in Task 3. We firmly believe that in order to
catalyze transit-oriented communities along the
corridor, key stakeholders and the community need to
review complete, succinct, graphically rich, and
technically sound alternatives for each station area
that will empower them to envision a new development
paradigm.
For each station area, we will develop up to two (2)
typology alternatives, generally reflecting lower and
higher- housing and job intensity development
scenarios. Key supporting infrastructure will be
identified at a conceptual level to support each vision,
including utility and street upgrades, parking facilities
and mobility hubs, public realm improvements, and
amenities. Each alternative will include a high-level
summary as well as a list of the impacts in order to
evaluate trade-offs and understand preferences. Once
the alternatives have been developed, Stantec will work
with KPA to engage the public through virtual and
in-person open houses, surveys, pop-up events, and
other outreach activities.
4.3 READINESS REVIEW
Based on our experience in the Inland Empire, Stantec
and HR&A understand that urban models of
development may not work in all station areas. Here,
as in other projects, we look to encourage typologies
that support transit ridership and are appropriate to
creating active, energetic environments that reflect
their communities. Financial feasibility analysis will
help identify the market appropriate scale and type of
development, as well as any required development
incentives needed to catalyze this activity.
To help inform the readiness review, HR&A will prepare
“back of the envelope” corridor-wide pro forma
residual land value analyses for up to five prototypical
development concepts, selected in partnership with
city staff and the Project Team. “Residual land value”
is what a developer could theoretically afford to pay
for land or a historic structure and earn a market-
responsive return on investment from development.
The analysis will include: estimated development costs
including hard and soft development costs, developer
profit and financing, key revenue components,
including rents, sale prices and operating expenses.
We will compare residual value estimates to prevailing
STANTEC'S URBAN PLACES30 of 3572
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
land values for the various land uses to determine
feasibility thresholds at each of the eight (8) station
areas. Understanding that real estate market appetite
and community desires may diverge, HR&A will test a
concise set of development program sensitivities to
establish a common ground and/or set of trade-offs to
achieve a set of financially feasible near-term
development scenarios that achieve community
desires.
4.4 PREFERRED TOC TYPOLOGY +
RECOMMENDATIONS
The final phase of the project will result in a set of
station area vision plans—one unified vision for each
of the eight (8) stations along the 91 and Perris Valley
Metrolink corridors. The vision plans will be combined
into a corridor-wide document. Each individual station
area plan will be largely graphic and will be no more
than 30 pages in length; additional information,
including technical memoranda, will be contained in
the appendix. Each plan will include at least the
following:
• A vision for each station area
• Recommended land uses, mobility strategies,
and first-last mile improvement projects
• Specific recommendations and for city-initiated
zoning changes
• Recommendations and prioritization for
pedestrian safety and other first/last mile
connectivity projects
• Identification of key redevelopment sites and
potential redevelopment strategy for at least one
site in each station area (see Task 4.3—readiness
review).
• Recommendations for other public investments,
such as public space, streetscape, art, and more
• Urban design vision and recommendations to
support transit-oriented development and
placemaking opportunities that help create
vibrant walkable places to live and work
• Goals and specific actions for ensuring housing
affordability
• Specific actions for supporting existing
businesses and adding jobs along the corridor
• Preparation of key conceptual design plans and
street sections for roadways and infrastructure
projects that can be used as the basis for grant
applications
Stantec will also, at a rough order of magnitude (ROM)
level, provide an assessment of each station area plan,
evaluating economic feasibility, ridership potential, job
and population growth, GHG and VMT impacts, and
other key metrics identified by RCTC and its partners.
Task 5—Implementation
5.1 TOC POLICY FRAMEWORK
From our extensive experience with all phases of the
development process, including zoning, permitting and
entitlements, and conceptual design through to
construction of TOD projects, the Stantec team
understands how to craft tailored implementation
strategies that will catalyze context-specific and
market-sensitive solutions throughout the corridor.
For each station area typology developed in Stantec
and HR&A will identify opportunities for and determine
the relative priority of various actions and
considerations that would help corridor cities leverage
the transformative potential of this major transit
infrastructure investment. For stations that currently
contain thriving high value, job-creating industrial uses
strategies will likely focus on opportunities to maintain
these uses while integrating them with other transit-
supportive land uses. For others with already
successful regional destinations, the strategies will
likely focus on opportunities to enhance connectivity
to these destinations, extending the economic benefit
of TOD to a wider geography. This will provide a
framework for RCTC, individual municipalities, and
other relevant stakeholders and community members
to understand recommended implementation actions
for each station area, while maintaining a corridor-wide
perspective on how local actions will relate to corridor-
wide goals.
Stantec will work with RCTC to develop an outline for
the Implementation Plan. At a minimum, we anticipate
the plan will include policies, plans and initiatives,
partnerships, major development opportunities,
phasing, ROM cost estimates (for infrastructure and
public realm projects), and funding and financing
strategies. We anticipate that the following key topics
will be covered in the Implementation Plan, along with
Burlington Great Streets, Burlington VT
31 of 3573
DR
A
F
T
examples of potential recommendations that could be
proposed for each station area:
STRATEGIES BY DISCIPLINE
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION
• Fiscal sustainability considerations
• Identifying financing strategies including local
fees, value capture, and other public financing
tools
• Governance opportunities and policy
considerations
LAND USE + ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
• Affordable housing preservation, protection, and
creation policies
• Affordable housing preservation, protection, and
creation policies
• Equitable economic and workforce development
strategies that mitigate displacement
• Attracting green jobs and industries that could
reduce pollution
• Transit-supportive strategies that reduce the
need for car-ownership
• Model zoning codes and policies to promote
transit-supportive development patterns
• General Plan and Specific Plan updates
PUBLIC REALM AND URBAN DESIGN
• Streetscape improvements and corridor greening
projects
• Parks and open space projects
• Development of design guidelines
INFRASTRUCTURE
• Key roadways to be upgraded
• Wet and dry utility improvements
MOBILITY STRATEGIES
• Improvements to key existing corridors and new
complete street improvement projects to
facilitate pedestrian and bicyclist activity
• Smart Mobility solutions including micro-mobility
(scooter- and bike-share), transportation-network
companies (TNC) and services such as Uber and
Lyft, autonomous personal vehicles and public
shuttles
• The Stantec team has a library of code updates
and parking management best practices that
incent shared parking, right-size parking ratios,
and parking use by time of day. We will use these
tools to create a set of planning-level parking
policy recommendations for the Activity Centers.
Bridge Street Corridor Plan, Dublin, OH
STANTEC'S URBAN PLACES32 of 3574
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
5.2 UPDATE TO RCTC JOINT DEVELOPMENT
GUIDELINES
Building from precedent research in Task 2.2, Stantec
team member HR&A will utilize Developer Advisory
Committee meetings to conduct preliminary market
sounding, review potential joint development
disposition and partnership strategies, and obtain
candid input. Using this input, HR&A will develop
specific Joint Development Strategy
recommendations related to:
• Requirements related to development program,
parking, and community benefits
• Phasing of development and related
infrastructure components
• Entitlements approach and alignment with local
jurisdiction policies
• Roles and responsibilities of RCTC, private
developer, and other stakeholders
• Funding sources or mechanisms for plan
components
• Disposition strategy and transaction framework
• Developer selection approach
• Key developer selection parameters
• Allocation of responsibility financing, designing,
and construction of the development plan’s
components such as new or relocated transit
facilities, access roadways, or traffic
improvements.
5.3 DRAFT + FINAL TRANSIT ORIENTED
COMMUNITIES STRATEGIC PLAN
We propose an additive approach to this project,
whereby the station area profiles, TOC typologies, best
practices, and other previous work become part of a
concise and compelling TOC Strategic Plan (Plan).
Curated content from past final deliverables will be
rolled up into the final plan, creating great efficiencies
and allowing the Stantec team to develop thoughtful,
comprehensive, and innovative solutions over the
18-month performance period.
We are committed to high-quality graphics and graphic
design principles, and our skilled design team will
present complex information, strategies, and plans in a
way that is informative, visionary, and easy to follow.
We recognize that the Plan will be used by a wide
variety of stakeholders, and we want to ensure that
developers, residents and businesses, and elected and
appointed officials alike are able to implement the plan
over the next several years.
Working with RCTC and the Technical Advisory
Committee, our team will develop an outline and
sample report templates for review and concurrence.
Project branding, including layout, color, fonts, and
graphics, will be carried into the Plan for consistency.
We anticipate that the Plan may be organized into
roughly 7 major sections, which could include:
1. Executive Summary
2. Station Area Profiles
3. Public Engagement Summary
4. Corridor-Wide TOC Vision
5. Station Area TOC Typologies
6. Implementation and Policy Framework Plan
7. Appendices
We will deliver a draft of the Plan to RCTC by month 16,
with ample time for RCTC and its partners to review
and provide comments. These comments will be
diligently tracked by the Stantec team and incorporated
into a Final TOC Strategic Plan.
Graphically-rich summary of proposed street, public realm, and infrastructure projects proposed for the
downtown riverside station area, with complete street and TOD best practices.
33 of 3575
Exhibit B
EXHIBIT "B"
SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
76
DR
A
F
T
RCTC TOC STRATEGIC PLAN
Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
TASK 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 Project Management and Quality Assurance
1.2 Data Request Memorandum
1.3 Kickoff Meeting
1.4 Coordination Meetings
TASK 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
2.1 Station Area Profiles
2.2 Best Practices Report
2.3 RCTC Joint Development Policy Review
TASK 3 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
3.1 Prepare a Community Engagement Plan
3.2 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
3.3 Developer Advisory Committee (DAC)
3.4 Community Advisory Committees (CAC)
3.5 Hybrid Open House
3.6 Virtual/In Person Design Workshops (3)
3.7 Pop-up Events (2)
3.8 Mailers and Collateral Materials
3.9 Social Media, Website, PR
3.10 Final Outreach Report
3.99 OPTIONAL: Additional Hybrid Open House
TASK 4 VISIONING
4.1 Vision, Goals, and Objectives
4.2 TOC Alternatives
4.3 Readiness Review
4.4 Preferred TOC Typology and Recommendations
TASK 5 IMPLEMENTATION
5.1 TOC Policy Framework
5.2 Update to RCTC Joint Development Guidelines
5.3 Draft and Final TOC Strategic Plan
SCHEDULE
1 2 3 4 5 6
LEGEND Task Duration Other Outreach Event Project kickoff
# Milestone 1-6
Draft deliverable
Final Deliverable 3D Vista Open House
Hybrid Open House
Pop Up Event
4 44
35 of 35
77
Exhibit C
EXHIBIT “C”
COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
78
DR
A
F
T
FIRM PROJECT TASKS/ROLE COST
Stantec Project Management 587,792.00
KPA Public Engagement 107,445.00
HR&A Advisors Economic Development 204,773.00
900,010.00
24,664.00
924,674.00$
FISCAL YEAR PROJECT COST
FY 2021/22 Task 1, 2, 3, 4 586,612.79
FY 2022/23 Task 1, 3, 4, 5 313,847.21
900,460.00
24,214.00
924,674.00$
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
TOTAL COSTS
1 Commission authorization pertains to total contract award amount. Compensation adjustments between consultants may occur;
however, the maximum total compensation authorized may not be exceeded.
SUBTOTAL
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
TOTAL COSTS
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION SUMMARY1
Prime Consultant:
Sub Consultants:
SUBTOTAL
79
Exhibit D
EXHIBIT "D"
FTA REQUIREMENTS
80
Exhibit D
FTA FUNDING REQUIREMENTS (Non-construction/maintenance work)
As used herein, “RCTC” shall have the same meaning as the “Commission.” The term “contract” or
“Contract” shall have the same meaning as the “Agreement.”
1. No Obligation by the Federal Government
a. RCTC and Consultant acknowledge and agree that, notwithstanding any concurrence by the
Federal Government in or approval of the solicitation or award of the underlying contract, absent the
express written consent by the Federal Government, the Federal Government is not a party to this
contract and shall not be subject to any obligations or liabilities to the Purchaser, Consultant, or any
other party (whether or not a party to that contract) pertaining to any matter resulting from the
underlying contract.
b. The Consultant agrees to include the above clause in each subcontract financed in whole or in
part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clause shall not be modified,
except to identify the subconsultant who will be subject to its provisions.
2. Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements or Related Acts
a. The Consultant acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of
1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq. and U.S. DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil
Remedies," 49 C.F.R. Part 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this Project. Upon execution of the
underlying contract, the Consultant certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement
it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining to the underlying contract or the
FTA assisted project for which this contract work is being performed. In addition to other penalties
that may be applicable, the Consultant further acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a
false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification, the Federal Government
reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 on the
Consultant to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate.
b. The Consultant also acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or
fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification to the Federal Government under a contract
connected with a project that is financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance originally awarded
by FTA under the authority of 49 U.S.C. § 5307, the Government reserves the right to impose the
penalties of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 49 U.S.C. § 5307(n)(1) on the Consultant, to the extent the Federal
Government deems appropriate.
c. The Consultant agrees to include the above two clauses in each subcontract financed in whole
or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA. It is further agreed that the clauses shall not be
modified, except to identify the subconsultant who will be subject to the provisions.
3. Access to Records
The Consultant agrees to the following access to records requirements:
a. To provide RCTC, the FTA Administrator, the Comptroller General of the United States or any
of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers and records of the
Consultant which are directly pertinent to this contract for the purposes of making audits,
examinations, excerpts and transcriptions. Consultant also agrees, pursuant to 49 C. F. R. 633.17 to
81
Exhibit D
provide the FTA Administrator or his authorized representatives including any PMO Consultant access
to Consultant's records and construction sites pertaining to a major capital project, defined at 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)1, which is receiving federal financial assistance through the programs described at 49 U.S.C.
5307, 5309 or 5311.
b. To make available in the case of a contract for a capital project or improvement, as defined
above and awarded by other than competitive bidding in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5325(a), records
related to the contract to RCTC, the Secretary of Transportation and the Comptroller General or any
authorized officer or employee of any of them for the purposes of conducting an audit and inspection.
c. To maintain all books, records, accounts and reports required under this contract for a period of
not less than three years after the date of termination or expiration of this contract, except in the event
of litigation or settlement of claims arising from the performance of this contract, in which case
Consultant agrees to maintain same until RCTC, the FTA Administrator, the Comptroller General, or
any of their duly authorized representatives, have disposed of all such litigation, appeals, claims or
exceptions related thereto. Reference 49 CFR 18.39(i)(11).
d. To permit any of the foregoing parties to reproduce by any means whatsoever or to copy
excerpts and transcriptions as reasonably needed.
4. Federal Changes
The Consultant shall at all times comply with all applicable FTA regulations, policies, procedures and
directives, including without limitation those listed directly or by reference in the Master Agreement
between RCTC and FTA, as they may be amended or promulgated from time to time during the term
of this contract. Consultant's failure to so comply shall constitute a material breach of this contract.
5. Civil Rights
The following requirements apply to the underlying contract:
(1) Nondiscrimination - In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §
2000d, section 303 of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6102, section 202
of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C.
§ 5332 and 49 CFR part 21, the Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, color, creed,
national origin, sex, age, or disability. In addition, the Consultant agrees to comply with applicable
Federal implementing regulations and other implementing requirements FTA may issue.
(2) Equal Employment Opportunity - The following equal employment opportunity requirements apply
to the underlying contract:
(a) Race, Color, Creed, National Origin, Sex - In accordance with Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and Federal transit laws at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Consultant
agrees to comply with all applicable equal employment opportunity requirements of U.S. Department
of Labor (U.S. DOL) regulations, "Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal
Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor," 41 C.F.R. Parts 60 et seq ., (which implement
Executive Order No. 11246, "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order No.
11375, "Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity," 42 U.S.C. §
2000e note), and with any applicable Federal statutes, executive orders, regulations, and Federal
82
Exhibit D
policies that may in the future affect construction activities undertaken in the course of the Project.
The Consultant agrees to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that
employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, national origin,
sex, or age. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or
other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. In addition, the
Consultant agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.
(b) Age - In accordance with section 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,
as amended, 29 U.S.C. § § 623, Federal transit law at 49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (U.S. EEOC) regulations, “Age Discrimination in Employment Act,” 29
C.F.R. part 1625, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq., U.S.
Health and Human Services regulations, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or
Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance,” 45 C.F.R. part 90, the Consultant agrees to refrain
from discrimination against present and prospective employees for reason of age. In addition, the
Consultant agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.
(c) Disabilities - In accordance with section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. § 794, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.,
the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 4151 et seq., and Federal transit law at
49 U.S.C. § 5332, the Consultant agrees that it will not discriminate against individuals on the basis of
disability, and that it will comply with the requirements of U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, "Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act," 29 C.F.R. Part 1630, pertaining to employment of persons with disabilities. In
addition, the Consultant agrees to comply with any implementing requirements FTA may issue.
(3) The Consultant also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract financed in whole
or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA, modified only if necessary to identify the
affected parties.
6. FTA Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Requirements
A. General DBE Requirements: In accordance with Federal financial assistance agreements with
the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT), Commission has adopted a Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise (DBE) Policy and Program, in conformance with Title 49 CFR Part 26,
“Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Programs” (the
“Regulations”). This RFP is subject to these stipulated regulations. In order to ensure that Commission
achieves its overall DBE Program goals and objectives, Commission encourages the participation of
DBEs as defined in 49 CFR 26 in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with U.S.
DOT funds.
It is the policy of the Commission to:
1. Ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts;
2. Create a level playing field on which DBE’s can compete fairly for DOT-assisted contracts;
3. Ensure that the DBE program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law;
83
Exhibit D
4. Ensure that only firms that fully meet 49 C.F.R. part 26 eligibility standards are permitted to
participate as DBE’s;
5. Help remove barriers to the participation of DBEs in DOT assisted contracts;
6. To promote the use of DBEs in all types of federally assisted contracts and procurement activities;
and
7. Assist in the development of firms that can compete successfully in the marketplace outside the
DBE program.
B. Discrimination: Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or
sex in the award and performance of subcontracts. Any terms used herein that are defined in 49 CFR
Part 26, or elsewhere in the Regulations, shall have the meaning set forth in the Regulations.
C. Commission’s Race-Neutral DBE Program: A Race-Neutral DBE Program is one that, while
benefiting DBEs, is not solely focused on DBE firms. Therefore, under a Race-Neutral DBE Program,
Commission does not establish numeric race-conscious DBE participation goals on its DOT-assisted
contracts. There is no FTA DBE goal on this Project.
Consultant shall not be required to achieve a specific level of DBE participation as a condition of
contract compliance in the performance of this DOT-assisted contract. However, Consultant
shall adhere to race-neutral DBE participation commitment(s) made at the time of award.
D. Race-Neutral DBE Submissions and Ongoing Reporting Requirements (Post-Award):
At termination of the Contract, the successful Consultant shall complete and submit to Commission a
“DBE Race-Neutral Participation Listing” in the form provided by Commission. In the event DBE(s)
are utilized in the performance of the Agreement, Consultant shall comply with applicable reporting
requirements.
E. Performance of DBE Subconsultants: DBE subconsultants listed by Consultant in its “DBE
Race-Neutral Participation Listing” submitted at the time of proposal shall perform the work and
supply the materials for which they are listed, unless Consultant has received prior written
authorization from Commission to perform the work with other forces or to obtain the materials from
other sources. Consultant shall provide written notification to Commission in a timely manner of any
changes to its anticipated DBE participation. This notice should be provided prior to the
commencement of that portion of the work.
F. DBE Certification Status: If a listed DBE subconsultant is decertified during the life of this
Agreement, the decertified subconsultant shall notify Consultant in writing with the date of
decertification. If a non-DBE subconsultant becomes a certified DBE during the life of this Agreement,
the DBE subconsultant shall notify Consultant in writing with the date of certification. Consultant shall
furnish the written documentation to Commission in a timely manner. Consultant shall include this
requirement in all subcontracts.
G. Consultant’s Assurance Clause Regarding Non-Discrimination: In compliance with State and
Federal anti-discrimination laws, Consultant shall affirm that it will not exclude or discriminate on the
basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in consideration of contract award opportunities. Further,
Consultant shall affirm that they will consider, and utilize subconsultants and vendors, in a manner
consistent with non-discrimination objectives.
84
Exhibit D
H. Violations: Failure by the selected Consultant(s) to carry out these requirements shall be a material
breach of the contract to be awarded pursuant to this RFP, which may result in the termination of the
contract or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited
to:
(1) Withholding monthly progress payments;
(2) Assessing sanctions;
(3) Liquidated damages; and/or
(4) Disqualifying the Consultant from future bidding as non-responsible. 49 C.F.R. § 26.13(b).
I. Prompt Payment: Consultant shall pay its subconsultants for satisfactory performance of their
contracts no later than 30 days from receipt of each payment Commission makes to the Consultant. 49
C.F.R. § 26.29(a), unless a shorter period is provided in the contract.
J. Compliance with DBE Requirements Contained in FTA Provisions: Consultant shall comply with all
DBE reporting and other requirements contained in this Agreement.
7. Incorporation of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Terms
The preceding provisions include, in part, certain Standard Terms and Conditions required by DOT,
whether or not expressly set forth in the preceding contract provisions. All contractual provisions
required by DOT, as set forth in FTA Circular 4220.1F are hereby incorporated by reference. Anything
to the contrary herein notwithstanding, all FTA mandated terms shall be deemed to control in the event
of a conflict with other provisions contained in this Agreement. The Consultant shall not perform any
act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any RCTC requests which would cause RCTC to
be in violation of the FTA terms and conditions.
8. Debarment and Suspension.
The Consultant agrees to the following:
(1) It will comply with the following requirements of 2 CFR Part 180, subpart C, as adopted and
supplemented by U.S. DOT regulations at 2 CFR Part 1200.
(2) It will not enter into any “covered transaction” (as that phrase is defined at 2 CFR §§ 180.220 and
1200.220) with any subconsultant whose principal is, suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from
participating in covered transactions, except as authorized by— (i) U.S. DOT regulations,
“Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment,” 2 CFR Part 1200; (ii) U.S. OMB regulatory guidance,
“Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement),” 2 CFR
Part 180; and (iii) Other applicable federal laws, regulations, or requirements regarding participation
with debarred or suspended recipients or third party participants.
(3) It will review the U.S. GSA “System for Award Management – Lists of Parties Excluded from
Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs,” if required by U.S. DOT regulations, 2 CFR
Part 1200.
9. ADA Access Requirements
85
Exhibit D
The Consultant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 (ADA), 42 USC Section 12101 et seq; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended, 29 USC Section 794; 49 USC Section 5301(d).
10. Fly America .
To the extent applicable to the Services, the Consultant agrees to comply with 49 U.S.C. 40118 (the
"Fly America" Act) in accordance with the General Services Administration's regulations at 41 CFR
Part 301-10, which provide that recipients and sub recipients of Federal funds and their consultants are
required to use U.S. Flag air carriers for U.S. Government-financed international air travel and
transportation of their personal effects or property, to the extent such service is available, unless travel
by foreign air carrier is a matter of necessity, as defined by the Fly America Act. The Consultant shall
submit, if a foreign air carrier was used, an appropriate certification or memorandum adequately
explaining why service by a U.S. flag air carrier was not available or why it was necessary to use a
foreign air carrier and shall, in any event, provide a certificate of compliance with the Fly America
requirements. The Consultant agrees to include the requirements of this section in all subcontracts that
may involve international air transportation.
11. Cargo Preference - Use of United States-Flag Vessels
To the extent applicable to the Services, the Consultant agrees:
1. To use privately owned United States-Flag commercial vessels to ship at least 50 percent of
the gross tonnage (computed separately for dry bulk carriers, dry cargo liners, and tankers)
involved, whenever shipping any equipment, material, or commodities pursuant to the
underlying contract to the extent such vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates for
United States-Flag commercial vessels;
2. To furnish within 20 working days following the date of loading for shipments originating
within the United States or within 30 working days following the date of leading for
shipments originating outside the United States, a legible copy of a rated, "on-board"
commercial ocean bill-of -lading in English for each shipment of cargo described in the
preceding paragraph to the Division of National Cargo, Office of Market Development,
Maritime Administration, Washington, DC 20590 and to the FTA recipient (through the
Consultant in the case of a subconsultant's bill-of-lading.)
3. To include these requirements in all subcontracts issued pursuant to this contract when the
subcontract may involve the transport of equipment, material, or commodities by ocean
vessel.
11. Buy America – Not applicable.
12. Employment Provisions
To the extent applicable to the Services, Consultant shall comply with the following:
A. Equal Employment Opportunity — Not applicable.
86
Exhibit D
B. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (18 U.S.C. 874 and 40 U.S.C. 276c) — Not applicable.
C. Contact Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327–333) —Not applicable.
D. Release of Retainage
No retainage will be withheld by the RCTC from progress payments due Consultant. Retainage by
Consultant or subconsultants is prohibited, and no retainage will be held by the prime consultant from
progress due subconsultants. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating Consultant or
subconsultants to the penalties, sanctions, and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the
California Business and Professions Code. This requirement shall not be construed to limit or impair
any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies, otherwise available to Consultant or
subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by Consultant or
deficient subconsultant performance, or noncompliance by a subconsultant.
13. Termination for Convenience
RCTC may terminate the Agreement for convenience in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
After such termination, the Consultant shall submit a final termination settlement proposal to RCTC as
directed. If the Consultant fails to submit a proposal within the time allowed, RCTC may determine, on
the basis of information available, the amount, if any due the Consultant because of the termination and
shall pay the amount determined. After the Consultant’s proposal is received, RCTC and Consultant
shall negotiate a fair and equitable settlement and the contract will be modified to reflect the negotiated
agreement. If agreement cannot be reached, RCTC may issue a final determination and pay the amount
determined. If the Consultant does not agree with this final determination or the determination resulting
from the lack of timely submission of a proposal, the Consultant may appeal under the Disputes clause.
14. Administrative and Contractual Remedies on Breach; Termination for Cause
a. The Consultant may be declared in breach of this Agreement (“Breach”) if the Consultant
fails to make delivery of the supplies or to perform the services within the time specified herein or any
extension thereof; or if the Consultant fails to perform any of the other provisions of the contract, or so
fails to make progress as to endanger performance of this contract in accordance with its terms. In case
of any of the foregoing, RCTC shall notify the Consultant of the Breach, and the Consultant shall have
a period of ten (10) days (or such longer period as RCTC may authorize in writing) after receipt of
notice from RCTC to cure the Breach.
b. RCTC may, by written notice of termination to the Consultant specifying the effective date
thereof, terminate the whole or any part of this contract, in the case of a Breach that is not cured within
the timeframe set forth in (a) above (“Uncured Breach”).
c. If the contract is terminated in whole or in part for an Uncured Breach, RCTC may procure
upon such terms and in such manner as RCTC may deem appropriate, supplies or services similar to
those so terminated, or may complete the services with its own forces. The Consultant shall be liable
to RCTC for any excess costs for such similar supplies or services, and for any other costs incurred by
RCTC as a result of the Uncured Breach. The Consultant shall continue the performance of this
contract to the extent not terminated under the provisions of this clause.
87
Exhibit D
d. Except with respect to defaults of Subconsultants, the Consultant shall not be liable for any
excess costs if the failure to perform the contract arises out of causes beyond the control and without
the fault or negligence of the Consultant. If the failure to perform is caused by the default of a
Subconsultant, and if such default arises out of causes beyond the control of both the Consultant and
the Subconsultant, and without the fault or negligence of either of them, the Consultant shall not be
liable for any excess costs for failure to perform, unless the supplies or services to be furnished by the
Subconsultant were obtainable from other sources in sufficient time to permit the Consultant to meet
the required project completion schedule.
e. Payment for completed services or supplies delivered to and accepted by RCTC shall be at the
contract price. RCTC may withhold from amounts otherwise due the Consultant for such completed
services or supplies such sum as RCTC determines to be necessary to protect RCTC against loss
because of outstanding liens of claims of former lien holders, or to reimburse RCTC for any other costs
related to the Uncured Breach.
f. If, after notice of termination of this contract for cause, it is determined for any reason that an
Uncured Breach did not exist, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the notice
of termination had been issued pursuant to the provisions for termination for convenience of RCTC.
g. The rights and remedies of RCTC provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in
addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law, equity or under this contract including, but
not limited to, the right to specific performance.
h. Notwithstanding the above, RCTC may, without providing an opportunity to cure, terminate the
contract in accordance with the timeframe set forth in Section 17 of the contract, if RCTC determines
such action is in its best interest based on the nature of the Breach. Such actions shall not limit any of
RCTC’s remedies set forth above.
16. Disputes
a. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any dispute concerning a question of fact
arising under this Agreement which is not disposed of by supplemental agreement shall be
decided by RCTC’s Deputy Executive Director, who shall reduce the decision to writing and mail or
otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the Consultant. The decision of the RCTC Deputy Executive
Director shall be final and conclusive unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of such
copy, Consultant mails or otherwise furnishes to the RCTC Deputy Executive Director a written appeal
addressed to RCTC's Executive Director. The decision of RCTC Executive Director or duly authorized
representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive.
b. The provisions of this Paragraph shall not be pleaded in any suit involving a question of fact
arising under this Agreement as limiting judicial review of any such decision to cases where fraud by
such official or his representative or board is alleged, provided, however, that any such decision shall
be final and conclusive unless the same is fraudulent or capricious or arbitrary or so grossly erroneous
as necessarily to imply bad faith or is not supported by substantial evidence. In connection with any
appeal proceeding under this Paragraph, the Consultant shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard
and to offer evidence in support of its appeal.
c. Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, Consultant shall proceed diligently with the
performance of this Agreement and in accordance with the decision of RCTC's Deputy Executive
Director. This "Disputes" clause does not preclude consideration of questions of law in connection with
88
Exhibit D
decisions provided for above. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall be construed as making final
the decision of any RCTC official or representative on a question of law, which questions shall be
settled in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
17. Lobbying
See the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment, 31 U.S.C. 1352, as amended by the Lobbying Disclosure
Act of 1995, P.L. 104-65 [to be codified at 2 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq.] - Consultants who apply or bid
for an award of $100,000 or more shall file the certification required by 49 CFR part 20, "New
Restrictions on Lobbying.” Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal
appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any
other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier shall also disclose the name of any registrant under
the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 who has made lobbying contacts on its behalf with non-Federal
funds with respect to that Federal contract, grant or award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Such
disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient. The Offeror shall complete and submit
with its bid/proposal the attached Certification Regarding Lobbying, and if applicable, the Standard
Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying.”
18. Energy Conservation
The Consultant agrees to comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency
which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act.
19. Clean Water
a. The Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued
pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. The
Consultant agrees to report each violation to RCTC and understands and agrees that RCTC will, in
turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional
Office.
d. The Consultant further agrees that:
(1) It will not use any violating facilities;
(2) It will report the use of facilities placed on or likely to be placed on the U.S. EPA “List of Violating
Facilities;”
(3) It will report violations of use of prohibited facilities to FTA; and
(4) It will comply with the inspection and other requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended, (42
U.S.C. §§ 7401 – 7671q); and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, (33 U.S.C. §§
1251-1387).
The Consultant also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000
financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.
20. Clean Air
a. The Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued
pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. The Consultant agrees to report
89
Exhibit D
each violation to RCTC and understands and agrees that RCTC will, in turn, report each violation as
required to assure notification to FTA and the appropriate EPA Regional Office.
b. The Consultant further agrees that:
(1) It will not use any violating facilities;
(2) It will report the use of facilities placed on or likely to be placed on the U.S. EPA “List of Violating
Facilities;”
(3) It will report violations of use of prohibited facilities to FTA; and
(4) It will comply with the inspection and other requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended, (42
U.S.C. §§ 7401 – 7671q); and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended, (33 U.S.C. §§
1251-1387).
c. The Consultant also agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding
$150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FTA.
21. Recycled Products
Recovered Materials - The Consultant agrees to comply with all the requirements of Section
6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 6962),
including but not limited to the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247, and Executive Order
12873, as they apply to the procurement of the items designated in Subpart B of 40 CFR Part
247.
21. SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PROMOTING COVID-19 SAFETY
Section 49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Order on Requirements for Persons
to Wear Masks While on Conveyances and at Transportation Hubs.
(a) Compliance with CDC Mask Order. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”)
Order of January 29, 2021, titled Requirement for Persons to Wear Masks While on Conveyances and
at Transportation Hubs (“CDC Mask Order”), applies to this Agreement. One of the objectives of the
CDC Mask Order is “[m]aintaining a safe and operating transportation system.” Consultant agrees that
it will comply, and will require all subconsultants to comply, with the CDC Mask Order.
(b) Enforcement for non-compliance. Consultant agrees that FTA and RCTC may take enforcement
action for non-compliance with the CDC Mask Order, including: (1) enforcement actions authorized by
49 U.S.C. § 5329(g); (2) referring Consultant to the CDC or other Federal authority for enforcement
action; (3) enforcement actions authorized by 2 CFR §§ 200.339 – .340; and (4) any other enforcement
action authorized by Federal law or regulation.
90
Exhibit D
22. Safe Operation of Motor Vehicles
Pursuant to Federal Executive Order No. 13043, “Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States,” April
16, 1997, 23 U.S.C. Section 402 note, FTA encourages each third party consultant to adopt and
promote on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees and other personnel that
operate company owned, rented, or personally operated vehicles, and to include this provision in each
third party subcontract involving the project.
a. The Consultant is encouraged to adopt and promote on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs
for its employees and other personnel that operate company-owned vehicles, company-rented vehicles,
or personally operated vehicles. The terms “company-owned” and “company-leased” refer to vehicles
owned or leased either by the Consultant or RCTC.
. The Consultant agrees to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes
caused by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while using an electronic device
supplied by an employer, and driving a vehicle the driver owns or rents, a vehicle Contactor owns,
leases, or rents, or a privately-owned vehicle when on official business in connection with the work
performed under this contract.
91
Exhibit E
EXHIBIT "E"
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
92
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Page 1
LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
EXHIBIT 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352
1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract
a. bid/offer/application
a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee,
Enter Name and Address of Prime:
Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known
6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:
CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________
8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:
10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services
(If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10)
(last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)
12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply)
$ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one-time fee
13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission
a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred
Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________
15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including
officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)
16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No
17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title
31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance
was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or
entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any
person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject
to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such failure.
Signature: ________________________________________
Print Name: _______________________________________
Title: ____________________________________________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date: ___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files
APPENDIX L - 1
N/A
0 None. Stantec does not
engage in lobbying
activities.
Andrew Irvine, AAILA, LEED AP
Senior Principal
4/27/2021
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(303) 575-8603
DR
A
F
T
93
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Page 1
LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
EXHIBIT 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352
1.Type of Federal Action:2.Status of Federal Action:3.Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________
4.Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5.If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee,
Enter Name and Address of Prime:
Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known
6.Federal Department/Agency:7.Federal Program Name/Description:
CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________
8.Federal Action Number, if known:9.Award Amount, if known:
10.Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11.Individuals Performing Services
(If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10)
(last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)
12.Amount of Payment (check all that apply)14.Type of Payment (check all that apply)
$ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one-time fee
13.Form of Payment (check all that apply):c. commission
a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________e deferred
Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________
15.Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including
officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)
16.Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No
17.Information requested through this form is authorized by Title
31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance
was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or
entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any
person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject
to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such failure.
Signature: ________________________________________
Print Name: _______________________________________
Title: ____________________________________________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date: ___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files
APPENDIX L - 1
HR&A Advisors, Inc. does not participating in Federal Lobbying activities.
Judith Taylor
Partner, HR&A Advisors, Inc.
310-882-0356 4/14/2021
DR
A
F
T
94
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
DR
A
F
T
95
AGENDA ITEM 6E
Agenda Item 6E
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: July 14, 2021
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee
David Thomas, Interim Toll Program Director
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Construction and Maintenance Agreement with BNSF Railway for
Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve Agreement No. 21-31-098-00 with BNSF Railway (BNSF) for a construction and
maintenance (C&M) agreement, including property acquisition, for the
Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount
of $1,988,607, plus a contingency amount of $104,470, for a total amount not to exceed
$2,093,077;
2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to finalize negotiations
with BNSF and execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency
amount as may be required by the 15/91 ELC.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The 15/91 ELC will provide tolled express lanes connectors between the existing 91 Express Lanes
and the future 15 Express Lanes to the north of SR-91 (Figure 1: Vicinity Map).
The 15/91 ELC involves adding:
1) A single-lane tolled express lane connector from the eastbound 91 Express Lanes to the
future northbound 15 Express Lanes that would extend in the median of I-15 in the
vicinity of the Hidden Valley Parkway interchange; and
2) A single-lane tolled express lane connector from the future southbound 15 Express
Lanes that would extend from the median of I-15 in the vicinity of the Hidden Valley
Parkway interchange and connect to the westbound 91 Express Lanes.
96
Agenda Item 6E
In addition, operational improvements are proposed to eastbound SR-91 consisting of
extending the single-lane of the eastbound 91 Express Lanes and adding one general purpose
lane through the 15/91 interchange.
DISCUSSION:
At the March 11, 2020 meeting, the Commission approved Agreement No. 19-31-074-00 with
Myers-Rados Joint Venture (MRJV) as the design-build contractor to design and construct the
15/91 ELC. Over the past year MRJV has been developing the design plans including new bridge
structures crossing the BNSF right of way in the vicinity of the Porphyry Yard at the
15/91 interchange.
The 15/91 ELC will require a C&M agreement with BNSF to allow the new bridge structures to be
constructed in BNSF’s right of way in the Porphyry Yard area at the I-15/SR-91 interchange as
part of the 15/91 ELC. The C&M agreement will include payment for flagging and plan review
costs by BNSF and the cost for temporary and permanent easements required for the 15/91 ELC.
Staff and BNSF estimated and negotiated costs totaling $1,988,607 for these elements, and staff
proposes a $104,470 contingency amount for a total authorization of $2,093,077. The
Commission would pay actual costs where the values are estimated.
Staff recommends the Commission authorize the Executive Director to finalize negotiations with
BNSF, execute the C&M agreement on behalf of the Commission, and authorize the
Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amounts as may be
required by the 15/91 ELC.
97
Agenda Item 6E
FISCAL IMPACT:
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes
N/A Year: FY 2021/22
FY 2022/23 Amount: $1,605,000
$488,077
Source of Funds: SB 132 funds and 91 Express Lanes Toll
Revenue Budget Adjustment: No
N/A
GL/Project Accounting No.: 003039 81402 00000 0000 605 31 81402 $1,309,854
003039 81304 00104 0000 605 31 81301 $783,223
Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/17/2021
Attachment: Agreement 21-31-098-00 (Draft)
Approved by the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee on
June 28, 2021
In Favor: 12 Abstain: 0 No: 0
98
1
WEST PORPHYRY OVERHEAD
CONSTRUCTION and MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
08-RIV-91 PM 6.93
BNSF Agreement No. BF-XXXXXXX
STATE Contract No. XXXXXX
EA 08-XXXXXX
RCTC Agreement No. 21-31-098-00
STATE Br. No. 56-0446
U.S. D.O.T. No. 026522X
San Bernardino Subdivision
LS 7602
MP 23.43
This Agreement (“Agreement”), is executed to be effective as of ___________________ (“Effective
Date”), by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("BNSF"), the STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, acting through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
(“STATE”), and the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereinafter referred to as (“RCTC”),
a public entity of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as (“Parties”).
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, BNSF owns and operates a line of railroad in and through the City of Corona, County of
Riverside, State of California, hereinafter referred to as (“Rail Corridor”);
WHEREAS, under STATE Records, the West Porphyry Overhead is also called the Temescal Bridge
and Overhead. For the purpose of this Agreement, these two names are interchangeable and may be
referred to hereinafter as West Porphyry Overhead or Temescal Overhead;
WHEREAS, BNSF’s predecessor in interest, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
and STATE entered into an Agreement dated June 15, 1959, carried in BNSF’s records as BNSF
Secretary’s Contract No. CL-63822, (“Original Agreement”) which provided for STATE’s construction
of the West Porphyry Overhead (Temescal Bridge and Overhead) STATE Br. No. 56-0446, DOT No.
026522X, (“OVERHEAD”) over the Rail Corridor;
WHEREAS, the RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
(“DISTRICT”) was added as a party to the Original Agreement by supplement dated July 23, 1985,
providing for STATE’s widening of the OVERHEAD over the Rail Corridor, the construction of the
99
2
Temescal Flood Control Channel (“CHANNEL”) across the Rail Corridor, and the replacement of
BNSF’s Br. 23.5, (“STRUCTURE”) over the CHANNEL;
WHEREAS, a supplement to the Original Agreement dated July 11, 2014, provided for RCTC’s
widening of the OVERHEAD over the Rail Corridor to allow for the extension of the existing tolled
express lanes on STATE Route 91 between the Riverside/Orange County line and Interstate Highway
I-15 South (“SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project”);
WHEREAS, BNSF and DISTRICT entered into a separate Ownership and Maintenance Agreement
covering the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the CHANNEL and STRUCTURE;
WHEREAS, BNSF, STATE and DISTRICT entered into a separate Termination Agreement providing
for the cancellation and termination of the Original Agreement, as supplemented, effective upon
completion of the construction of the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project’s modification of the
OVERHEAD;
This Agreement shall provide for the invoicing of the costs of the railroad work to be performed by
BNSF and the reimbursement to BNSF, by RCTC, of such costs in connection with the modification of
all four of the overpasses which are part of the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project;
WHEREAS, RCTC and STATE desire to proceed with construction involving the modification of the
OVERHEAD providing for its partial demolition, widening, construction of express lanes, and new ramp
connections to Interstate Highway I-15 North to accommodate the Interstate Highway I-15/SR-91
Express Lane Connector Project (“I-15/SR-91 Express Lane Connector Project”);
WHEREAS, RCTC will fund the cost to design and construct the I-15 Express Lane Connector Project
using a design build contractor (“Contractor”);
WHEREAS, STATE is the owner of STATE Route 91, Interstate Highway I-15 and the STATE Highway
System;
WHEREAS, RCTC and STATE have entered into Cooperative Agreement No. 08-1679 dated
September 21, 2018, permitting RCTC to acquire property on behalf of STATE and to design and
construct the I-15/SR-91 Express Lane Connector Project;
WHEREAS, upon completion and acceptance of the I-15/SR-91 Express Lane Connector Project by
STATE, STATE will thereafter own and maintain all highway improvements made by RCTC under this
Agreement;
WHEREAS, pursuant to this Agreement, RCTC will acquire from BNSF a Temporary Construction
License; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to this Agreement, RCTC will acquire a permanent easement (“Easement”), on
behalf of the STATE, as required for the I-15/SR-91 Express Lane Connector Project .
100
3
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of the Parties
contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I) SCOPE OF WORK
1. The term "Project" as used herein includes any and all work related to the construction of the
proposed I-15/SR-91 Express Lane Connector Project widening of the West Porphyry Overhead (I-15
North) State Br. No. 56-0446 (hereinafter referred to as the "Structure"), more particularly described
on the Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, including, but not limited to, any and all
changes to telephone, telegraph, signal and electrical lines and appurtenances, temporary and
permanent track work, fencing, grading, alterations to or new construction of drainage facilities,
preliminary and construction engineering and contract preparation, right of way acquisition, construction
management. Additionally, temporary controls during construction must be in compliance with Section
8A.08, "Temporary Traffic Control Zones" of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(“CAMUTCD”).
ARTICLE II) BNSF OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of the covenants of RCTC and STATE set forth herein and the faithful performance
thereof, BNSF agrees as follows:
1. Upon RCTC payment to BNSF of an administrative fee in the sum of Two Thousand Five
Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($2,500), together with the Temporary Construction License Fee in the
sum of XXXXXXXXXXXXX and No/100 Dollars ($XXX,XXX), BNSF hereby grants to RCTC, its
successors and assigns, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, a
temporary non-exclusive license (hereinafter called, “Temporary Construction License”) to construct
the Project across or upon the portion of BNSF's right-of-way described further on Exhibit A-1, as
described further in the Legal Descriptions, Exhibit G and as shown on Parcel Maps Exhibit G1,
attached to this Agreement, excepting and reserving BNSF’s rights, and the rights of any others who
have obtained, or may obtain, permission or authority from BNSF, to do the following:
(a) Operate, maintain, renew and/or relocate any and all existing railroad track or tracks,
wires, pipelines and other facilities of like character upon, over or under the surface of
said right-of-way for the Rail Corridor;
101
4
(b) Construct, operate, maintain, renew and/or relocate upon said right-of-way, without
limitation, such facilities as the BNSF may from time to time deem appropriate, provided
such facilities do not materially interfere with the RCTC’s construction of the Project;
(c) Otherwise use or operate the right-of-way as BNSF may from time to time deem
appropriate, provided such use or operations does not materially interfere with STATE’s
use of the East Corona Overhead; and
(d) Require RCTC or its contractor to execute a Temporary Construction Crossing
Agreement, for any temporary crossing requested to aid in the construction of this Project.
The term of the Temporary Construction License shall begin on the date that the Contractor
issues a Notice to Commence Construction at the start of flagging services and ends on the earlier of
(i) substantial completion of the Project, or (ii) Thirty (30) months following the Notice to Commence
Construction. The Temporary Construction License and related rights to be given by BNSF to RCTC
shall be without warranty of title of any kind, express or implied, and no covenant of warranty of title will
be implied from the use of any word or words therein contained. The Temporary Construction License
shall be for the construction of the Project and for no other purpose. In the event STATE or RCTC is
evicted by anyone owning, or claiming title to or any interest in said Rail Corridor, BNSF will not be
liable to STATE or RCTC for any damages, losses or any expenses of any nature whatsoever. BNSF
shall not grant similar rights to others, subsequent to the date of this Agreement, that impair or interfere
with the rights granted to RCTC pursuant to the Temporary Construction License.
Upon RCTC payment to BNSF of the additional sum of XXXXXXXXXXX and No/100 Dollars
($XX,XXX), such payment to be made within thirty (30) days of issuing the Notice to Proceed pursuant
to Article III, Section 16 of this Agreement, and provided further that RCTC is in compliance with the
term and conditions of this Agreement, BNSF will grant to State, its successors and assigns, an
easement (hereinafter called, the “Easement”) to enter upon and use that portion of BNSF’s right-of-
way as is necessary to use and maintain the Structure, substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached
to this Agreement. If RCTC fails to pay BNSF within the thirty day time period set forth in the preceding
sentence, BNSF may stop construction of the Project until full payment is received by BNSF.
2. BNSF will furnish all labor, materials, tools, and equipment for railroad work required for the
construction of the Project, such railroad work and the estimated cost thereof being as shown on Exhibit
D attached hereto and made a part hereof. In the event construction on the Project has not commenced
within six (6) months following the Effective Date, BNSF may, in its sole and absolute discretion, revise
the cost estimates set forth in said Exhibit D. In such event, the revised cost estimates will become a
part of this Agreement as though originally set forth herein. Any item of work incidental to the items
listed on Exhibit D not specifically mentioned therein may be included as a part of this Agreement upon
written approval of RCTC, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Construction of the Project
must include the following railroad work by BNSF:
a) Procurement of materials, equipment and supplies necessary for the railroad work;
102
5
b) Preliminary engineering, design, and contract preparation;
(c) Furnishing of flagging services during construction of the Project as required and set forth
in further detail on Exhibit C;
(d) Furnishing engineering and inspection as required in connection with the construction of
the Project;
(e) Providing a contract project coordinator, at RCTC’s expense, to serve as a project
manager for the Project;
3. BNSF will do all railroad work set forth in Article II, Section 2 above on an actual cost basis, when
BNSF, in its sole discretion, determines it is required by its labor agreements to perform such work with
its own employees working under applicable collective bargaining agreements.
4. RCTC agrees to reimburse BNSF for work of an emergency nature caused by RCTC or RCTC’s
contractor in connection with the Project which BNSF deems is reasonably necessary for the immediate
restoration of railroad operations, or for the protection of persons or BNSF property. Such work may
be performed by BNSF with notification provided to RCTC as soon as practicable and RCTC agrees to
fully reimburse BNSF for all such emergency work.
5. BNSF may charge RCTC for insurance expenses, including self-insurance expenses, when such
expenses cover the cost of Employer's Liability (including, without limitation, liability under the Federal
Employer's Liability Act) in connection with the construction of the Project. Such charges will be
considered part of the actual cost of the Project, regardless of the nature or amount of ultimate liability
for injury, loss or death to BNSF's employees, if any.
6. During the construction of the Project, BNSF will send RCTC progressive invoices detailing the
costs of the railroad work performed by BNSF under this Agreement. RCTC must reimburse BNSF for
completed force-account work within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice for such work. Upon
completion of the Project, BNSF will send RCTC a detailed invoice of final costs, segregated as to labor
and materials for each item in the recapitulation shown on Exhibit D. Pursuant to this section and
Article IV, Section 7 herein, RCTC must pay the final invoice within ninety (90) days of the date of the
final invoice. BNSF will assess a finance charge of .033% per day (12% per annum) on any unpaid
sums or other charges due under this Agreement which are past its credit terms. The finance charge
continues to accrue daily until the date payment is received by BNSF, not the date payment is made or
the date postmarked on the payment. Finance charges will be assessed on delinquent sums and other
charges as of the end of the month and will be reduced by amounts in dispute and any unposted
payments received by the month’s end. Finance charges will be noted on invoices sent to RCTC under
this section. For purposes of computing the time limits prescribed by Section 911.2 of the
California Government Code for the presentment of a claim against the RCTC the cause of
action for failure to reimburse BNSF for the costs of the Railroad work performed by it pursuant
103
6
to this Agreement shall be deemed to have accrued one hundred and eighty (180) days after the
date of receipt of the final invoice.
ARTICLE III) RCTC OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of the covenants of STATE and BNSF set forth herein and the faithful performance
thereof, RCTC agrees as follows:
1. RCTC must furnish to BNSF and STATE plans and specifications for the Project. One digital
set of said plans (reduced size 11” x 17”), together with one digital copy of calculations, and one digital
copy of specifications in English Units, must be submitted to BNSF and STATE for approval prior to
commencement of any construction. BNSF will give RCTC final written approval of the plans and
specifications substantially in the form of Exhibit E, attached to this Agreement and made a part hereof.
Upon BNSF’s final written approval of the plans and specifications, said plans and specifications will
become part of this Agreement and are hereby incorporated herein. Any approval of the plans and
specifications by BNSF shall in no way obligate BNSF in any manner with respect to the finished
product design and/or construction. Any approval by BNSF shall mean only that the plans and
specifications meet the subjective standards of BNSF, and such approval by BNSF shall not be deemed
to mean that the plans and specifications or construction is structurally sound and appropriate or that
such plans and specifications meet applicable regulations, laws, statutes or local ordinances and/or
building codes.
2. RCTC must make application to the California Public Utility Commission (“Commission”) for
an order authorizing construction of the Project and will furnish the Commission plans of the proposed
construction, approved by BNSF and STATE, together with a copy of this Agreement.
3. RCTC must obtain all other required permits and approvals for the construction of the project.
4. RCTC must provide for and maintain minimum vertical and horizontal clearances, as required in
Exhibit C and as approved by BNSF as part of the plans and specifications for the Project. Prior to
execution of this Agreement RCTC shall have provided to BNSF exact minimum vertical and horizontal
clearances for the Project, and such Final Clearances must have been previously approved by BNSF
and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A (“Final Clearances”). RCTC shall not deviate
from the Final Clearances agreed to prior to this Agreement without the prior written approval of BNSF.
5. RCTC must acquire all rights of way necessary for the construction of the Project.
6. RCTC must make any and all arrangements, in compliance with BNSF’s Utility Accommodation
Manual (http://www.bnsf.com/communities/faqs/pdf/utility.pdf), for the installation or relocation of wire
lines, pipe lines and other facilities owned by private persons, companies, corporations, political
104
7
subdivisions or public utilities other than BNSF which may be necessary for the construction of the
Project..
7. RCTC must construct the Project as shown on the attached Exhibit A and do all work (“RCTC’s
Work”) provided for in the plans and specifications for the Project, except railroad work that will be
performed by BNSF hereunder. RCTC must furnish all labor, materials, tools and equipment for the
performance of RCTC Work. The principal elements of RCTC Work are as follows:
(a) Preliminary and final Engineering;
(b) Design and the construction of the OVERHEAD;
(c) Construction of required retaining walls;
(d) Repairing the scouring of the head of banks by storm water runoff from the highway
surface above at the south abutment for the existing structure and installation of slope
paving;
(e) Providing of suitable drainage, both temporary and permanent, and correct the drainage
that is currently flowing to BNSF’s property so that no highway drainage is directed to
BNSF’s Rail Corridor;
(f) All other necessary grading and paving, including backfill of excavations and restoration
of disturbed vegetation on BNSF’s Rail Corridor;
(g) Application of the DOT No. 026595H and the CPUC No. 002B-22.90-A signage in
conspicuous locations on the EXPRESS LANE OVERHEAD;
(h) Removal of the sleeves for any CID Piles to a depth of five feet below ground surface;
and
(i) Job site cleanup within Project area including removal of all construction materials, all
temporary track embankment not being reused by BNSF, all ballast not reclaimed by
BNSF, concrete debris, surplus soil, refuse, disturbed contaminated soils, asphalt debris,
litter and other waste materials to the satisfaction of BNSF
8. RCTC’s Work must be performed by RCTC or RCTC’s contractor in a manner that will not
endanger or interfere with the safe and timely operations of BNSF and its facilities.
9. RCTC must require its contractor(s) to notify BNSF's Roadmaster at least thirty (30) calendar
days prior to requesting a BNSF flagman in accordance with the requirements of Exhibit C attached
hereto. Additionally, RCTC must require its contractor(s) to notify BNSF’s Manager of Public Projects
thirty (30) calendar days prior to commencing work on BNSF property or near BNSF tracks.
105
8
10. RCTC or its contractor(s) must submit one (1) digital copy of any plans (including one set of
calculations in English Units) for proposed shoring, falsework or cribbing to be used over, under, or
adjacent to BNSF's tracks to BNSF's Project Engineer for approval. The shoring, falsework or cribbing
used by RCTC contractor shall comply with the BNSF Bridge Requirements set forth on Exhibit F and
all applicable requirements promulgated by state and federal agencies, departments, commissions and
other legislative bodies. If necessary, RCTC must submit for approval one (1) copy of a professionally
engineered demolition plan, as set forth in Exhibit H, with applicable calculations to BNSF’s Project
Engineer. The existing East Corona Overhead will not be removed until BNSF approves RCTC’s
demolition plan in writing.
11. RCTC must include the following provisions in any contract with its contractor(s) performing work
on said Project:
(a) The Contractor is placed on notice that fiber optic, communication and other cable
lines and systems (collectively, the “Lines”) owned by various telecommunications
companies may be buried on BNSF’s property or right-of-way. The locations of these
Lines have been included on the plans based on information from the
telecommunications companies. The Contractor will be responsible for contacting
BNSF’s Engineering Representative, Signal Representative and the
telecommunications companies and notifying them of any work that may damage
these Lines or facilities and/or interfere with their service. The Contractor must also
mark all Lines shown on the plans or marked in the field in order to verify their
locations. The Contractor must also use all reasonable methods when working in the
BNSF right-of-way or on BNSF property to determine if any other Lines (fiber optic,
cable, communication or otherwise) may exist.
(b) The Contractor will be responsible for the rearrangement of any facilities or Lines
determined to interfere with the construction. The Contractor must cooperate fully
with any telecommunications company(ies) in performing such rearrangements.
(c) Failure to mark or identify these Lines will be sufficient cause for BNSF’s engineering
representative to stop construction at no cost to the or BNSF until these items are
completed.
(d) In addition to the liability terms contained elsewhere in this Agreement, The Contractor
hereby indemnifies, defends and holds harmless BNSF for, from and against all cost,
liability, and expense whatsoever (including, without limitation, attorney’s fees and
court costs and expenses) arising out of or in any way contributed to by any act or
omission of Provider, its subcontractors, agents and/or employees that cause or in
any way or degree contribute to (1) any damage to or destruction of any Lines by
Provider, and/or its subcontractors, agents and/or employees, on BNSF’s property or
within BNSF’s right-of-way, (2) any injury to or death of any person employed by or on
behalf of any telecommunications company, and/or its contractor, agents and/or
employees, on BNSF’s property or within BNSF’s right-of-way, and/or (3) any claim or
cause of action for alleged loss of profits or revenue by, or loss of service by a
106
9
customer or user of such telecommunication company(ies). THE LIABILITY
ASSUMED BY THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE FACT, IF
IT IS A FACT, THAT THE DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION, INJURY, DEATH, CAUSE OF
ACTION OR CLAIM WAS OCCASIONED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY THE
NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES OR
OTHERWISE, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS ARE
PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OR SOLE
NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF.
12. RCTC must require compliance with the obligations set forth in this agreement, including Exhibit
C and Exhibit C-1, and incorporate in each prime contract for construction of the Project, or the
specifications therefor (i) the provisions set forth in Article III and IV; and (ii) the provisions set forth in
Exhibit C, Exhibit C-l, and Exhibit F attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof.
13. Except as otherwise provided below in this Section 13, all construction work performed
hereunder by RCTC for the Project will be pursuant to a contract or contracts to be let by RCTC, and
all such contracts must include the following:
(a) All work performed under such contract or contracts within the limits of BNSF's right-of-
way must be performed in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with plans and
specifications approved by BNSF;
(b) Changes or modifications during construction that affect safety or BNSF operations must
be subject to BNSF's approval;
(c) No work will be commenced within BNSF's right-of-way until each of the prime contractors
employed in connection with said work must have (i) executed and delivered to BNSF an
agreement in the form of Exhibit C-l, and (ii) delivered to and secured BNSF's approval
of the required insurance; and
(d) To facilitate scheduling for the Project, RCTC shall have its contractor give BNSF’s
representative 8 weeks advance notice of the proposed times and dates for work
windows. BNSF and RCTC contractor will establish mutually agreeable work windows
for the Project. BNSF has the right at any time to revise or change the work windows,
due to train operations or service obligations. BNSF will not be responsible for any
additional costs and expenses resulting from a change in work windows. Additional costs
and expenses resulting from a change in work windows shall be accounted for in the
contractor’s expenses for the Project.
(e) The plans and specifications for the Project must be in compliance with the Bridge
Requirements set forth on Exhibit F, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein.
107
10
14. RCTC must advise the appropriate BNSF Manager of Public Projects, in writing, of the
completion date of the Project within thirty (30) days after such completion date. Additionally, RCTC
must notify BNSF's Manager of Public Projects, in writing, of the date on which RCTC and/or its
Contractor will meet with BNSF for the purpose of making final inspection of the Project.
15. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, RCTC HEREBY RELEASES,
INDEMNIFIES, DEFENDS AND HOLDS HARMLESS STATE AND BNSF, ITS AFFILIATED
COMPANIES, PARTNERS, SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, OFFICERS,
DIRECTORS, SHAREHOLDERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS FOR, FROM AND AGAINST ANY
AND ALL CLAIMS, LIABILITIES, FINES, PENALTIES, COSTS, DAMAGES, LOSSES, LIENS,
CAUSES OF ACTION, SUITS, DEMANDS, JUDGMENTS AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT
LIMITATION, COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES) OF ANY NATURE, KIND OR
DESCRIPTION OF ANY PERSON (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE EMPLOYEES OF
THE PARTIES HERETO) OR ENTITY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, RESULTING
FROM OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE OR IN PART) (I) THE USE, OCCUPANCY OR PRESENCE OF
RCTC, ITS CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS IN, ON, OR ABOUT
THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, (II) THE PERFORMANCE, OR FAILURE TO PERFORM BY THE
RCTC, ITS CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS, ITS WORK OR
ANY OBLIGATION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, (III) THE SOLE OR CONTRIBUTING ACTS OR
OMISSIONS OF RCTC, ITS CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS
IN, ON, OR ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, (IV) RCTC’S BREACH OF THE TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION LICENSE OR EASEMENT GRANTED TO RCTC PURSUANT TO ARTICLE II OF
THIS AGREEMENT, (V) ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS GRANTED TO RCTC PURSUANT TO THE
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE OR EASEMENT DISCUSSED IN ARTICLE II OF THIS
AGREEMENT, (VI) RCTC’S OCCUPATION AND USE OF BNSF’S PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY,
INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SUBSEQUENT MAINTENANCE OF THE STRUCTURE BY
RCTC, OR (VII) AN ACT OR OMISSION OF RCTC OR ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, INVITEES,
EMPLOYEES OR CONTRACTORS OR ANYONE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY ANY
OF THEM, OR ANYONE THEY CONTROL OR EXERCISE CONTROL OVER. THE LIABILITY
ASSUMED BY RCTC WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE FACT, IF IT IS A FACT, THAT THE
DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION, INJURY OR DEATH WAS OCCASIONED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO
BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES OR OTHERWISE,
EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS ARE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE WILLFUL
MISCONDUCT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF STATE OR BNSF.
16. RCTC must give BNSF’s Manager of Public Projects written notice to proceed (“Notice to
Proceed”) with the railroad work after receipt of necessary funds for the Project. BNSF will not begin
the railroad work (including, without limitation, procurement of supplies, equipment or materials) until
written notice to proceed is received from RCTC.
108
11
ARTICLE IV - STATE OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of the covenants of BNSF and RCTC herein contained and the faithful performance
thereof, STATE agrees:
1. To permit RCTC to act as the responsible lead to design and construct the Project.
2. Upon completion, STATE will own and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the
STRUCTURE, the highway approaches, and appurtenances thereto, lighting, drainage and any
access roadway to BNSF gates installed pursuant to this Agreement.
3. State must provide BNSF with any and all necessary permits and maintain roadway traffic
controls, at no cost to BNSF, whenever requested by BNSF to allow BNSF to inspect the Structure.
4. STATE must, at STATE’s sole cost and expense, keep the STRUCTURE painted and free
from graffiti;
5. STATE must maintain the DOT No. 026522X and CPUC No. 002B-22.90-A signage in legible
condition in the conspicuous locations on the STRUCTURE where applied by RCTC during
construction;
6. It is understood by STATE that the right to install utilities for highway purposes is restricted to
the placement of underground utilities beneath BNSF's tracks located a minimum of fifty (50) feet
from abutments, piers, piles, or footings with the exception that upon BNSF’s prior approval BNSF will
permit selected utilities to be installed closer to the abutments, piers, piles, footings. Under no
circumstances will utilities be allowed to hang from the STRUCTURE. All utility crossings within the
limits of BNSF's Rail Corridor will be covered by separate agreements between BNSF and each of
the owners of the utilities.
7. It is expressly understood that the Easement grants the State or RCTC acting on behalf of the
State, the right to install, upgrade, replace, and maintain State-owned utilities on, above or within the
structure so long as the utilities are used exclusively for highway purposes. These utilities do not
require a separate permit or license agreement from BNSF.
8. STATE must keep the STRUCTURE and surrounding areas clean and free from birds,
pigeons, scavengers, vermin, creatures and other animals; and
9. In conformance with and limited to the applicable effect of California Laws insofar as the
indemnity and insurance provisions set forth in any of the preceding sections or any rider,
amendment or addendum hereto, STATE is self-insured. If STATE performs (i) alterations or
109
12
modifications to the STRUCTURE, or (ii) any maintenance or other work on the STRUCTURE with
heavy tools, equipment or machinery at ground surface level, horizontally within 25’-0” of the
centerline of the nearest track, or (iii) any maintenance or other work outside the limits of the deck of
the STRUCTURE vertically above the top of the rail, then STATE shall provide BNSF defense and
indemnification at least equal to the defense, indemnification and insurance provisions contained in
the current Exhibit C-1 at the time alterations or modifications to the STRUCTURE are undertaken, in
accordance with California Government Code section 14662.5. Nothing herein shall be deemed to
insure BNSF against its sole negligence or willful misconduct. Notwithstanding the foregoing, STATE
agrees not to commence such alterations, modifications, maintenance, or other work to the
STRUCTURE with day labor, until such time as (i) BNSF has procured, at STATE’s sole cost and
expense, a Railroad Protective Liability insurance policy naming BNSF as the insured, as required by
the current Exhibit C-1, and (ii) STATE has reimbursed BNSF for the costs to obtain the Railroad
Protective Liability insurance policy.
10. Subject to the restrictions imposed by Article V, Section 11 below, STATE must notify and
obtain prior authorization from BNSF's Manager Public Projects to perform (i) inspection that requires
access to BNSF rights of way, (ii) alterations or modifications to the STRUCTURE, or (iii) any
maintenance or other work on, over or under the STRUCTURE before entering BNSF's Rail Corridor
or for work located a minimum distance of 25’-0” measured horizontally from the centerline of the
nearest track or a greater distance specified by BNSF’s Manager Public Projects and must comply
with the obligations set forth in Exhibit C, Exhibit C-1 and Exhibit F, as the same may be revised from
time to time. In the event any of the work to be done on behalf of STATE upon BNSF's Rail Corridor
is to be done by a contractor, STATE will be responsible for its contractor(s) compliance with such
obligations.
11. PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 14662.5, STATE HEREBY
AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS BNSF FROM, AND TO REPAIR OR PAY FOR
ANY DAMAGE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY REASON OF THE USES AUTHORIZED BY THIS
AGREEMENT AND THE EASEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE STRUCTURE.
ARTICLE (V) JOINT OBLIGATIONS
IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, the parties hereto mutually agree to the following:
1. All work contemplated in this Agreement must be performed in a good and workmanlike manner
and each portion must be promptly commenced by the party obligated hereunder to perform the same
and thereafter diligently prosecuted to conclusion in its logical order and sequence. Furthermore, any
changes or modifications during construction which affect BNSF will be subject to BNSF's approval
prior to the commencement of any such changes or modifications. BNSF will notify RCTC of potential
impacts to Project at the time said impacts are known, subject to the provisions of Article II, Section 5.
110
13
2. The work hereunder must be done in accordance with the Bridge Requirements set forth on
Exhibit F and the detailed plans and specifications approved by BNSF.
3. RCTC must require its contractor(s) to reasonably adhere to the Project's construction schedule
for all Project work. The parties hereto mutually agree that BNSF's failure to complete the railroad work
in accordance with the construction schedule due to inclement weather or unforeseen railroad
emergencies will not constitute a breach of this Agreement by BNSF and will not subject BNSF to any
liability. Regardless of the requirements of the construction schedule, BNSF reserves the right to
reallocate the labor forces assigned to complete the railroad work in the event of an emergency to
provide for the immediate restoration of railroad operations of either (BNSF or its related railroads) or
to protect persons or property on or near any BNSF owned property. BNSF will not be liable for any
additional costs or expenses resulting from any such reallocation of its labor forces. The parties
mutually agree that any reallocation of labor forces by BNSF pursuant to this provision and any direct
or indirect consequences or costs resulting from any such reallocation will not constitute a breach of
this Agreement by BNSF.
4. BNSF will have the right to stop construction work on the Project if any of the following events
take place: (i) RCTC (or any of its contractors) performs the Project work in a manner contrary to the
plans and specifications approved by BNSF; (ii) RCTC (or any of its contractors), in BNSF’s opinion,
prosecutes the Project work in a manner that is hazardous to BNSF property, facilities or the safe and
expeditious movement of railroad traffic; (iii) the insurance described in the attached Exhibit C-1 is
canceled during the course of the Project; or (iv) RCTC fails to pay BNSF for the Temporary
Construction License or the Easement pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of this Agreement. The work
stoppage will continue until all necessary actions are taken by RCTC or its contractor to rectify the
situation to the satisfaction of BNSF’s Division Engineer or until proof of additional insurance has been
delivered to and accepted by BNSF. In the event of a breach of (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Temporary
Construction License, or (iii) the Easement, BNSF may immediately terminate the Temporary
Construction License or the Easement. Any such work stoppage under this provision will not give rise
to any liability on the part of BNSF. BNSF’s right to stop the work is in addition to any other rights BNSF
may have including, but not limited to, actions or suits for damages or lost profits. In the event that
BNSF desires to stop construction work on the Project, BNSF agrees to immediately notify the following
individual in writing:
David Thomas
Toll Program Director
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92502-2208
Office: (951) 778-7958
Fax (951) 787-7920
dthomas@rctc.org
111
14
5. RCTC must supervise and inspect the operations of all RCTC contractors to ensure compliance
with the plans and specifications approved by BNSF, the terms of this Agreement and all safety
requirements of BNSF. If BNSF determines that proper supervision and inspection are not being
performed by RCTC personnel at any time during construction of the Project, BNSF has the right to
stop construction (within or adjacent to its operating right-of-way). Construction of the Project will not
proceed until RCTC corrects the situation to BNSF’s reasonable satisfaction. If BNSF feels the situation
is not being corrected in an expeditious manner, BNSF will immediately notify for appropriate corrective action.
6. Pursuant to this section and Article II, Section 6 herein, RCTC must reimburse BNSF in full for the actual
costs of all work performed by BNSF under this Agreement (including taxes, such as applicable sales and use
taxes, business and occupation taxes, and similar taxes), less BNSF’s Share as set forth in Article IV, Section 6
herein. BNSF’s Share must be paid upon completion of the Project.
7. In any action brought under this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover its actual
costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1717, as well as other litigation costs,
including expert witness fees. The prevailing Party shall also be entitled to recover all actual attorneys’ fees
and litigation costs incurred in connection with the enforcement of a judgment arising from such action or
proceeding.
8. All expenses detailed in statements sent to RCTC pursuant to Article II, Section 6 herein will comply with
the terms and provisions of the Title 23 U.S. Code, Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations, and the Federal-Aid
Policy Guide, U.S. Department of Transportation, as amended from time to time, which manual is hereby
incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement by reference. The parties mutually agree that BNSF's
preliminary engineering, design, and contract preparation costs described in Article II, Section 2 herein are part
of the costs of the Project even though such work may have preceded the date of this Agreement.
9. The parties mutually agree that neither construction activities for the Project, nor future maintenance of
the Structure once completed, will be permitted during the fourth quarter of each calendar year. Emergency work
will be permitted only upon prior notification to BNSF's Network Operations Center (telephone number: 800 832-
5452). The parties hereto mutually understand and agree that trains cannot be subjected to delay during this
time period.
10. Subject to the restrictions imposed by Article IV, Section 9 above, the construction of the Project will not
commence until RCTC gives BNSF's Manager of Public Projects thirty (30) days prior written notice of such
commencement. The commencement notice will reference D.O.T. Crossing No. 026595H and must state the
time that construction activities will begin.
11. In addition to the terms and conditions set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, including, but not limited
to, the terms and conditions stated in Exhibit F, BNSF and RCTC agree to the following terms upon completion
of construction of the Project:
(a) BNSF will continue to own and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, its roadbed,
track, railroad drainage, and all other railroad facilities, however, nothing herein
contained shall relieve STATE of any liability it would otherwise have with respect to
112
15
damage caused to the STRUCTURE by negligent act or omission of STATE or its
employees;
(b) In the event emergency repairs to the Structure appear necessary due to an earthquake, fire,
flood, damage from vehicular impacts or other emergent situations, BNSF will immediately notify
STATE of the need. Should emergency repairs become necessary, with prior notice to STATE,
or the situation results in any materials causing an infringement upon or violate the minimum
clearances described in Exhibit C, BNSF may remove the materials by any methods that would
not cause damage to or in any way jeopardize the structural integrity of the bridge deck,
superstructure, or substructure. Notification of such action must be communicated to the
STATE’s district bridge maintenance superintendent or his delegate as soon as practically
possible.
(c) It is expressly understood that the Easement grants the State or RCTC acting on behalf
of the State, the right to install, upgrade, replace, and maintain State-owned utilities on,
above or within the structure so long as the utilities are used exclusively for highway
purposes. These utilities do not require a separate permit or license agreement from
BNSF.
12. RCTC must provide one set of as built plans (prepared in English Units) to BNSF and to STATE, as well
as one set of as built CAD drawings of the Structure and identifying the software used for the CAD drawings.
The "as built plans" must comply with the Bridge Requirements set forth on Exhibit F and depict all information
in BNSF engineering stationing and mile post pluses. The "as built plans" must also include plan and profile,
structural bridge drawings and specifications, and drainage plans. All improvements and facilities must be
shown.
13. Subject to the restrictions imposed by Article IV, Section 9 above and in accordance with the requirements
of Article III, Section 9 above, State must notify and obtain prior authorization from BNSF's Manager of Public
Projects before entering BNSF's right-of-way for INSPECTION OR MAINTENANCE purposes, and the BNSF
Manager of Public Projects will determine if flagging is required. If the construction work hereunder is contracted,
State must require its prime contractor(s) to comply with the obligations set forth in Exhibit C and Exhibit C-1, as
the same may be revised from time to time. State will be responsible for its contractor(s) compliance with such
obligations.
14. In the event that BNSF shall deem it necessary or desirable in the future, in the performance of
its duty as a common carrier, to raise or lower the grade or change the alignment of its tracks or to lay
additional track or tracks or to build other facilities in connection with the operation of its railroad, BNSF
shall, at its expense, have full right to make such changes or additions, provided such changes or
additions do not change or alter the Structure herein proposed to be constructed and provided further,
however, that should it become necessary or desirable in the future to change, alter, widen or
reconstruct the Structure to accommodate railroad projects, the cost of such work, including any cost
incidental to alteration of railroad or highway facilities made necessary by the alteration of the Structure
113
16
shall be the sole responsibility of BNSF unless BNSF and State mutually agree to divide the cost in
such shares as may be mutually agreed to by them.
15. State may, at State’s sole expense, alter or reconstruct the highway components of the Structure if
necessary or desirable, due to traffic conditions or pedestrian or other recreational traffic, provided, however,
that any such alteration or reconstruction must receive BNSF’s prior written approval as evidenced by either a
supplement to this Agreement, or execution of a new agreement that provides for the termination of this
Agreement. Furthermore, any alteration or reconstruction of the highway components of the Structure will be
covered by a Commission Order.
16. Any books, papers, records and accounts of the parties hereto relating to the work hereunder or the costs
or expenses for labor and material connected with the construction will at all reasonable times be open to
inspection and audit by the agents and authorized representatives of the parties hereto, as well as the State of
California and the Federal Highway Administration, for a period of one (1) year from the date of the final BNSF
invoice under this Agreement.
17. The covenants and provisions of this Agreement are binding upon and inure to the benefit of
the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, neither
party hereto may assign any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of
the other party.
18. In the event construction of the Project does not commence within (3) years of the Effective
Date, this Agreement will become null and void.
19. Neither termination nor expiration of this Agreement will release either party from any liability or
obligation under this Agreement, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions
or events happening prior to the date of termination or expiration.
20. To the maximum extent possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such a
manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law. If any provision of this Agreement is prohibited
by, or held to be invalid under, applicable law, such provision will be ineffective solely to the extent of
such prohibition or invalidity and the remainder of the provision will be enforceable.
21. This Agreement (including exhibits and other documents, manuals, etc. incorporated herein) is
the full and complete agreement between BNSF and RCTC with respect to the subject matter herein
and supersedes any and all other prior agreements between the parties hereto.
22. Any notice provided for herein or concerning this Agreement must be in writing and will be
deemed sufficiently given when sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at the
following addresses:
BNSF: Manager of Public Projects
Kate Kalinosky
740 E. Carnegie Drive
San Bernardino, CA 92408
114
17
Email: kate.kalinosky@bnsf.com
RCTC: Michael Blomquist
Toll Program Director
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92502-2208
Office: (951) 778-1098
Fax (951) 787-7920
Email: mblomquist@rctc.org
STATE: Department of Transportation
Tiaira T. Moering, Chief
Office of Railroads and Utilities Relocation
Division of Right of Way & Land Surveys
1120 N Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-5690
Office: (916) 654-6553
Email: tiaira.moering @dot.ca.gov
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and
attested by its duly qualified and authorized officials as of the day and year first above written.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
By:
Kate Kalinosky
Manager Public Projects
WITNESS:
115
18
RCTC’s signature page follows on the next page.
116
19
RCTC
By:
Printed Name:
Title: _____________________
WITNESS:
STATE’s signature page follows on the next page.
117
20
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By:
TIAIRA T. MOERING
Title: Chief, Office of Railroads & Utility Relocations
Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys
APPROVAL TO FORM:
Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
TERESA McNAMARA
Railroad Coodinator
Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys
118
21
Summary of Exhibits
EXHIBIT TITLE
A Plans and Profile Sheets of Project
B Easement Deed
C
C-1
Contractor Requirements
Agreement Between BNSF Railway Company and the
Contractor
D BNSF Cost Estimate
E Plans and Specifications Approval Letter
F BNSF Bridge Requirements
G
G-1
Legal Description
Parcel Map
H BNSF’s Instructions for the Preparation of Demolition Plans
119
Exhibit A
[Insert drawing of the Project and/or Structure]
120
EASEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR EB and WB Temescal Wash Overhead
(Overpass Agreement)
THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR _________________ ("Easement
Agreement") is made and entered into as of the ____ day of _________ 2021 ("Effective
Date"), by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
("Grantor"), and RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANPORTATION COMMISSION, a public
entity ("Grantee").
A. Grantor owns or controls certain real property situated at or near the vicinity
of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, at Mile Post 23.43, [Project # BF
10012943], as described or depicted on Exhibit "A-1" attached hereto and made a part
hereof (the "Premises").
B. Grantor and Grantee have entered into that certain Overpass Agreement
dated as of ______________________________________ concerning improvements
on or near the Premises (the “Overpass Agreement”).
C. Grantee has requested that Grantor grant to Grantee an easement over the
Premises for the Easement Purpose (as defined below).
D. Grantor has agreed to grant Grantee such easement, subject to the terms
and conditions set forth in this Easement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing recitals which are
incorporated herein, the mutual promises contained herein, and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
agree as follows:
Section 1 Granting of Easement.
1.1 Easement Purpose. The "Easement Purpose" shall be for the purposes
set forth in the OVERPASS Agreement. Any improvements to be
constructed in connection with the Easement Purpose are referred to herein
as "Improvements" and shall be constructed, located, configured and
maintained by Grantee in strict accordance with the terms of this Easement
Agreement and the OVERPASS Agreement.
1.2 Grant. Grantor does hereby grant unto Grantee a non-exclusive easement
("Easement") over the Premises for the Easement Purpose and for no other
purpose. The Easement is granted subject to any and all restrictions,
121
covenants, easements, licenses, permits, leases and other encumbrances
of whatsoever nature whether or not of record, if any, relating to the
Premises and subject to all with all applicable federal, state and local laws,
regulations, ordinances, restrictions, covenants and court or administrative
decisions and orders, including Environmental Laws (defined below) and
zoning laws (collectively, "Laws"). Grantor may not make any alterations
or improvements or perform any maintenance or repair activities within the
Premises except in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
OVERPASS Agreement.
1.3 Reservations by Grantor. Grantor excepts and reserves the right, to be
exercised by Grantor and any other parties who may obtain written
permission or authority from Grantor:
(a) to install, construct, maintain, renew, repair, replace, use, operate,
change, modify and relocate any existing pipe, power,
communication, cable, or utility lines and appurtenances and other
facilities or structures of like character (collectively, "Lines") upon,
over, under or across the Premises;
(b) to install, construct, maintain, renew, repair, replace, use, operate,
change, modify and relocate any tracks or additional facilities or
structures upon, over, under or across the Premises; and
(c) to use the Premises in any manner as the Grantor in its sole
discretion deems appropriate, provided Grantor uses all
commercially reasonable efforts to avoid material interference with
the use of the Premises by Grantee for the Easement Purpose.
Section 2 Term of Easement. The term of the Easement, unless sooner terminated
under provisions of this Easement Agreement, shall be perpetual. The term of this
Easement, unless sooner terminated under provisions of this Easement Agreement, shall
expire on the date that is ___________________________________ after the Effective
Date.
Section 3 No Warranty of Any Conditions of the Premises. Grantee acknowledges
that Grantor has made no representation whatsoever to Grantee concerning the state or
condition of the Premises, or any personal property located thereon, or the nature or
extent of Grantor's ownership interest in the Premises. Grantee has not relied on any
statement or declaration of Grantor, oral or in writing, as an inducement to entering into
this Easement Agreement, other than as set forth herein. GRANTOR HEREBY
DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, WHETHER EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, AS TO THE DESIGN OR CONDITION OF ANY PROPERTY PRESENT ON
OR CONSTITUTING THE PREMISES, ITS MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, THE QUALITY OF THE MATERIAL OR
WORKMANSHIP OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY, OR THE CONFORMITY OF ANY SUCH
122
PROPERTY TO ITS INTENDED USES. GRANTOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE
TO GRANTEE OR ANY OF GRANTEE'S CONTRACTORS FOR ANY DAMAGES
RELATING TO THE DESIGN, CONDITION, QUALITY, SAFETY, MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY PROPERTY PRESENT ON
OR CONSTITUTING THE PREMISES, OR THE CONFORMITY OF ANY SUCH
PROPERTY TO ITS INTENDED USES. GRANTEE ACCEPTS ALL RIGHTS GRANTED
UNDER THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE PREMISES IN AN "AS IS, WHERE IS"
AND "WITH ALL FAULTS" CONDITION, AND SUBJECT TO ALL LIMITATIONS ON
GRANTOR'S RIGHTS, INTERESTS AND TITLE TO THE PREMISES. Grantee has
inspected or will inspect the Premises, and enters upon Grantor's rail corridor and
property with knowledge of its physical condition and the danger inherent in Grantor's rail
operations on or near the Premises. Grantee acknowledges that this Easement
Agreement does not contain any implied warranties that Grantee or Grantee's Contractors
(as hereinafter defined) can successfully construct or operate the Improvements.
Section 4 Nature of Grantor's Interest in the Premises. GRANTOR DOES NOT
WARRANT ITS TITLE TO THE PREMISES NOR UNDERTAKE TO DEFEND GRANTEE
IN THE PEACEABLE POSSESSION OR USE THEREOF. NO COVENANT OF QUIET
ENJOYMENT IS MADE. In case of the eviction of Grantee by anyone owning or claiming
title to or any interest in the Premises, or by the abandonment by Grantor of the affected
rail corridor, Grantor shall not be liable to refund Grantee any compensation paid
hereunder.
Section 5 Improvements. Grantee shall take, in a timely manner, all actions
necessary and proper to the lawful establishment, construction, operation, and
maintenance of the Improvements, including such actions as may be necessary to obtain
any required permits, approvals or authorizations from applicable governmental
authorities. Any and all cuts and fills, excavations or embankments necessary in the
construction, maintenance, or future alteration of the Improvements shall be made and
maintained in such manner, form and extent as will provide adequate drainage of and
from the adjoining lands and premises of the Grantor; and wherever any such fill or
embankment shall or may obstruct the natural and pre-existing drainage from such lands
and premises of the Grantor, the Grantee shall construct and maintain such culverts or
drains as may be requisite to preserve such natural and pre-existing drainage, and shall
also wherever necessary, construct extensions of existing drains, culverts or ditches
through or along the premises of the Grantor, such extensions to be of adequate sectional
dimensions to preserve the present flowage of drainage or other waters, and of materials
and workmanship equally as good as those now existing. In the event any construction,
repair, maintenance, work or other use of the Premises by Grantee will affect any Lines,
fences, buildings, improvements or other facilities (collectively, "Other Improvements"),
Grantee will be responsible at Grantee’s sole risk to locate and make any adjustments
necessary to such Other Improvements. Grantee must contact the owner(s) of the Other
Improvements notifying them of any work that may damage these Other Improvements
and/or interfere with their service and obtain the owner’s written approval prior to so
affecting the Other Improvements. Grantee must mark all Other Improvements on the
Plans and Specifications and mark such Other Improvements in the field in order to verify
123
their locations. Grantee must also use all reasonable methods when working on or near
Grantor property to determine if any Other Improvements (fiber optic, cable,
communication or otherwise) may exist. The Grantee agrees to keep the above-described
premises free and clear from combustible materials and to cut and remove or cause to
be cut and removed at its sole expense all weeds and vegetation on said premises, said
work of cutting and removal to be done at such times and with such frequency as to
comply with Grantee and local laws and regulations and abate any and all hazard of fire.
Section 6 Taxes and Recording Fees. Grantee shall pay when due any taxes,
assessments or other charges (collectively, "Taxes") levied or assessed upon the
Improvements by any governmental or quasi-governmental body or any Taxes levied or
assessed against Grantor or the Premises that are attributable to the Improvements.
Grantee agrees to purchase, affix and cancel any and all documentary stamps in the
amount prescribed by statute, and to pay any and all required transfer taxes, excise taxes
and any and all fees incidental to recordation of the Memorandum of Easement. In the
event of Grantee's failure to do so, if Grantor shall become obligated to do so, Grantee
shall be liable for all costs, expenses and judgments to or against Grantor, including all
of Grantor's legal fees and expenses.
Section 7 Environmental.
7.1 Compliance with Environmental Laws. Grantee shall strictly comply with
all federal, state and local environmental Laws in its use of the Premises, including, but
not limited to, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (RCRA), the
Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
and the Toxic Substances Control Act (collectively referred to as the "Environmental
Laws"). Grantee shall not maintain a "treatment," "storage," "transfer" or "disposal"
facility, or "underground storage tank," as those terms are defined by Environmental
Laws, on the Premises. Grantee shall not handle, transport, release or suffer the release
of "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substances", as "hazardous waste" and "hazardous
substances" may now or in the future be defined by any Environmental Laws.
7.2 Notice of Release. Grantee shall give Grantor immediate notice to Grantor's
Resource Operations Center at (800) 832-5452 of any release of hazardous substances
on or from the Premises, violation of Environmental Laws, or inspection or inquiry by
governmental authorities charged with enforcing Environmental Laws with respect to
Grantee's use of the Premises. Grantee shall use its best efforts to promptly respond to
any release on or from the Premises. Grantee also shall give Grantor immediate notice
of all measures undertaken on behalf of Grantee to investigate, remediate, respond to or
otherwise cure such release or violation.
7.3 Remediation of Release. In the event that Grantor has notice from Grantee
or otherwise of a release or violation of Environmental Laws which occurred or may occur
during the term of this Easement Agreement, Grantor may require Grantee, at Grantee's
sole risk and expense, to take timely measures to investigate, remediate, respond to or
124
otherwise cure such release or violation affecting the Premises. If during the construction
or subsequent maintenance of the Improvements, soils or other materials considered to
be environmentally contaminated are exposed, Grantee will remove and safely dispose
of said contaminated soils. Determination of soils contamination and applicable disposal
procedures thereof, will be made only by an agency having the capacity and authority to
make such a determination.
7.4 Preventative Measures. Grantee shall promptly report to Grantor in writing
any conditions or activities upon the Premises known to Grantee which create a risk of
harm to persons, property or the environment and shall take whatever action is necessary
to prevent injury to persons or property arising out of such conditions or activities;
provided, however, that Grantee's reporting to Grantor shall not relieve Grantee of any
obligation whatsoever imposed on it by this Easement Agreement. Grantee shall
promptly respond to Grantor's request for information regarding said conditions or
activities.
7.5 Evidence of Compliance. Grantee agrees periodically to furnish Grantor
with proof satisfactory to Grantor that Grantee is in compliance with this Section 7.
Should Grantee not comply fully with the above-stated obligations of this Section 7,
notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision hereof, Grantor may, at its
option, terminate this Easement Agreement by serving five (5) days' notice of termination
upon Grantee. Upon termination, Grantee shall remove the Improvements and restore
the Premises as provided in Section 9.
Section 8 Default and Termination.
8.1 Grantor's Performance Rights. If at any time Grantee, or Grantee's
Contractors, fails to properly perform its obligations under this Easement Agreement,
Grantor, in its sole discretion, may: (i) seek specific performance of the unperformed
obligations, or (ii) at Grantee's sole cost, may arrange for the performance of such work
as Grantor deems necessary for the safety of its rail operations, activities and property,
or to avoid or remove any interference with the activities or property of Grantor, or anyone
or anything present on the rail corridor or property with the authority or permission of
Grantor. Grantee shall promptly reimburse Grantor for all costs of work performed on
Grantee's behalf upon receipt of an invoice for such costs. Grantor's failure to perform
any obligations of Grantee or Grantee's Contractors shall not alter the liability allocation
set forth in this Easement Agreement.
8.2 Abandonment. Grantor may, at its option, terminate this Easement
Agreement by serving five (5) days' notice in writing upon Grantee if Grantee should
abandon or cease to use the Premises for the Easement Purpose. Any waiver by Grantor
of any default or defaults shall not constitute a waiver of the right to terminate this
Easement Agreement for any subsequent default or defaults, nor shall any such waiver
in any way affect Grantor's ability to enforce any section of this Easement Agreement.
8.3 Effect of Termination or Expiration. Neither termination nor expiration will
125
release Grantee from any liability or obligation under this Easement, whether of indemnity
or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of
termination or expiration, or, if later, the date the Premises are restored as required by
Section 9.
8.4 Non-exclusive Remedies. The remedies set forth in this Section 8 shall be
in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other remedies that Grantor may have under
the OVERPASS Agreement, at law or in equity.
Section 9 Surrender of Premises.
9.1 Removal of Improvements and Restoration. Upon termination of this
Easement Agreement, whether by abandonment of the Easement or by the exercise of
Grantor's termination rights hereunder, Grantee shall, at its sole cost and expense,
immediately perform the following:
(h) remove all or such portion of Grantee's Improvements and all
appurtenances thereto from the Premises, as Grantor directs
at Grantor's sole discretion;
(i) repair and restore any damage to the Premises arising from,
growing out of, or connected with Grantee's use of the
Premises;
(j) remedy any unsafe conditions on the Premises created or
aggravated by Grantee; and
(k) leave the Premises in the condition which existed as of the
Effective Date.
9.2 Limited License for Entry. If this Easement Agreement is terminated,
Grantor may direct Grantee to undertake one or more of the actions set forth above, at
Grantee's sole cost, in which case Grantee shall have a limited license to enter upon the
Premises to the extent necessary to undertake the actions directed by Grantor. The terms
of this limited license include all of Grantee's obligations under this Easement Agreement.
Termination will not release Grantee from any liability or obligation under this Easement
Agreement, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or
events happening prior to the date of termination, or, if later, the date when Grantee's
Improvements are removed and the Premises are restored to the condition that existed
as of the Effective Date. If Grantee fails to surrender the Premises to Grantor upon any
termination of the Easement, all liabilities and obligations of Grantee hereunder shall
continue in effect until the Premises are surrendered.
Section 10 Liens. Grantee shall promptly pay and discharge any and all liens arising
out of any construction, alterations or repairs done, suffered or permitted to be done by
Grantee on the Premises or attributable to Taxes that are the responsibility of Grantee
126
pursuant to Section 6. Grantor is hereby authorized to post any notices or take any other
action upon or with respect to the Premises that is or may be permitted by Law to prevent
the attachment of any such liens to any portion of the Premises; provided, however, that
failure of Grantor to take any such action shall not relieve Grantee of any obligation or
liability under this Section 10 or any other section of this Easement Agreement.
Section 11 Tax Exchange. Grantor may assign its rights (but not its obligations) under
this Easement Agreement to Goldfinch Exchange Company LLC, an exchange
intermediary, in order for Grantor to effect an exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal
Revenue Code. In such event, Grantor shall provide Grantee with a Notice of
Assignment, attached as Exhibit C, and Grantee shall execute an acknowledgement of
receipt of such notice.
Section 12 Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder by one
party to the other shall be delivered in the manner set forth in the OVERPASS
Agreement. Notices to Grantor under this Easement shall be delivered to the following
address: BNSF Railway Company, Real Estate Department, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, Ft.
Worth, TX 76131, Attn: Permits, or such other address as Grantor may from time to time
direct by notice to Grantee.
Section 13 Recordation. It is understood and agreed that this Easement Agreement
shall not be in recordable form and shall not be placed on public record and any such
recording shall be a breach of this Easement Agreement. Grantor and Grantee shall
execute a Memorandum of Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B-1" (the
"Memorandum of Easement") subject to changes required, if any, to conform such form
to local recording requirements. [IF LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT AVAILABLE USE
THE FOLLOWING IN PLACE OF THE PRIOR SENTENCE: As of the Effective Date, a
legal description of the Premises is not available. Grantee and Grantor shall work
together in good faith to establish the legal description for the Premises. Once Grantor
and Grantee have approved the legal description, Grantor and Grantee shall execute a
Memorandum of Easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B-1" (the
"Memorandum of Easement").] The Memorandum of Easement shall be recorded in
the real estate records in the county where the Premises are located. If a Memorandum
of Easement is not executed by the parties and recorded as described above within
_30___ days of the Effective Date, Grantor shall have the right to terminate this Easement
Agreement upon notice to Grantee.
Section 14 Miscellaneous.
14.1 All questions concerning the interpretation or application of provisions of
this Easement Agreement shall be decided according to the substantive Laws of the State
of California without regard to conflicts of law provisions.
14.2 In the event that Grantee consists of two or more parties, all the covenants
and agreements of Grantee herein contained shall be the joint and several covenants and
agreements of such parties. This instrument and all of the terms, covenants and
127
provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon each of the parties
hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns and shall run
with and be binding upon the Premises.
14.3 If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms
of this Easement Agreement, the prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to reasonable
attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which
such party or parties may be entitled.
14.4 If any provision of this Easement Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or
unenforceable under present or future Laws, such provision will be fully severable and
this Easement Agreement will be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or
unenforceable provision is not a part hereof, and the remaining provisions hereof will
remain in full force and effect. In lieu of any illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision
herein, there will be added automatically as a part of this Easement Agreement a
provision as similar in its terms to such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision as may
be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable.
14.5 This Easement Agreement is the full and complete agreement between
Grantor and Grantee with respect to all matters relating to Grantee's use of the Premises,
and supersedes any and all other agreements between the parties hereto relating to
Grantee's use of the Premises as described herein. However, nothing herein is intended
to terminate any surviving obligation of Grantee or Grantee's obligation to defend and
hold Grantor harmless in any prior written agreement between the parties.
14.6 Time is of the essence for the performance of this Easement Agreement.
Section 15 Administrative Fee.
15.1 Grantee acknowledges that a material consideration for this agreement,
without which it would not be made, is the agreement between Grantee and Grantor, that
the Grantee shall pay upon return of this Agreement signed by Grantee to Grantor's
Broker a processing fee in the amount of $2,500.00 over and above the agreed upon
Acquisition Price. Said fee shall be made payable to BNSF Railway Company by a
separate check.
[Signature page follows]
128
Witness the execution of this Easement Agreement as of the date first set forth above.
GRANTOR:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
GRANTEE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION,
a Public Entity
By:
Name: Anne Mayer
Title: Executive Director
129
EXHIBIT "A-1"
Premises
130
EXHIBIT "B-1"
Memorandum of Easement
THIS MEMORANDUM OF EASEMENT is hereby executed this day of
, 2021, by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Grantor"),
whose address for purposes of this instrument is 2500 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131,
and RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a Public Entity("Grantee"),
whose address for purposes of this instrument is 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA
92501, which terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" shall include, wherever the context permits or
requires, singular or plural, and the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the
respective parties:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Grantor owns or controls certain real property situated in Riverside County,
California as described on Exhibit "A-1" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
(the "Premises');
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee entered into an Easement Agreement, dated
(the "Easement Agreement") which set forth, among other things, the terms of an
easement granted by Grantor to Grantee over and across the Premises (the "Easement"); and
WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee desire to memorialize the terms and conditions of the
Easement Agreement of record.
For valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Grantor does grant unto Grantee and Grantee does hereby accept from Grantor the Easement
over and across the Premises.
The term of the Easement, unless sooner terminated under provisions of the Easement
Agreement, shall be perpetual. Provisions regulating the use and purposes to which the
Easement shall be limited, are set forth in detail in the Easement Agreement and Grantor and
Grantee agree to abide by the terms of the Easement Agreement.
131
All the terms, conditions, provisions and covenants of the Easement Agreement are
incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes as though written out at length herein, and
both the Easement Agreement and this Memorandum of Easement shall be deemed to constitute
a single instrument or document. This Memorandum of Easement is not intended to amend,
modify, supplement, or supersede any of the provisions of the Easement Agreement and, to the
extent there may be any conflict or inconsistency between the Easement Agreement or this
Memorandum of Easement, the Easement Agreement shall control.
[Signature page follows]
132
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor and Grantee have executed this Memorandum of
Easement to as of the date and year first above written.
GRANTOR:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
GRANTEE:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATON
COMMISSION
By:
Name: Anne Mayer
Title: Executive Director
STATE OF _______________ §
§
COUNTY OF _____________ §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ___ day of _________________, 20__, by
(name) as
(title) of BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation.
133
Notary Public
(Seal)
My appointment expires:
STATE OF _______________ §
§
COUNTY OF _____________ §
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ___ day of _________________, 20__, by
(name) as (title) of
____________________________, a ______________________.
Notary Public
(Seal)
My appointment expires:
134
EXHIBIT "C"
CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS
1.01 General:
• 1.01.01 The Contractor must cooperate with BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, hereinafter
referred to as "Railway" where work is over or under on or adjacent to Railway property and/or
right-of-way, hereafter referred to as "Railway Property", during the construction of
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________.
• 1.01.02 The Contractor must execute and deliver to the Railway duplicate copies of the
Exhibit “C-1” Agreement, in the form attached hereto, obligating the Contractor to provide and
maintain in full force and effect the insurance called for under Section 3 of said Exhibit “C-1”.
Questions regarding procurement of the Railroad Protective Liability Insurance should be
directed to Rosa Martinez at Marsh, USA, 214-303-8519.
• 1.01.03 The Contractor must plan, schedule and conduct all work activities so as not to
interfere with the movement of any trains on Railway Property.
• 1.01.04 The Contractor's right to enter Railway's Property is subject to the absolute right
of Railway to cause the Contractor's work on Railway's Property to cease if, in the opinion of
Railway, Contractor's activities create a hazard to Railway's Property, employees, and/or
operations. Railway will have the right to stop construction work on the STRUCTURE if any
of the following events take place: (i) Contractor (or any of its subcontractors) performs the
STRUCTURE work in a manner contrary to the plans and specifications approved by Railway;
(ii) Contractor (or any of its subcontractors), in Railway’s opinion, prosecutes the
STRUCTURE work in a manner which is hazardous to Railway property, facilities or the safe
and expeditious movement of railroad traffic; (iii) the insurance described in the attached
Exhibit C-1 is canceled during the course of the STRUCTURE; or (iv) Contractor fails to pay
Railway for the Temporary Construction License or the Easement. The work stoppage will
continue until all necessary actions are taken by Contractor or its subcontractor to rectify the
situation to the satisfaction of Railway’s Division Engineer or until additional insurance has
been delivered to and accepted by Railway. In the event of a breach of (i) this Agreement, (ii)
the Temporary Construction License, or (iii) the Easement, Railway may immediately
terminate the Temporary Construction License or the Easement. Any such work stoppage
under this provision will not give rise to any liability on the part of Railway. Railway’s right to
stop the work is in addition to any other rights Railway may have including, but not limited to,
actions or suits for damages or lost profits. In the event that Railway desires to stop
construction work on the STRUCTURE, Railway agrees to immediately notify the following
individual in writing:
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
135
• 1.01.05 The Contractor is responsible for determining and complying with all Federal, State
and Local Governmental laws and regulations, including, but not limited to environmental laws
and regulations (including but not limited to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as
amended; the Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation
Act, CERCLA), and health and safety laws and regulations. The Contractor hereby
indemnifies, defends and holds harmless Railway for, from and against all fines or penalties
imposed or assessed by Federal, State and Local Governmental Agencies against the
Railway which arise out of Contractor's work under this Agreement.
• 1.01.06 The Contractor must notify (Agency) at and Railway's Manager
Public Projects, telephone number ( ) at least thirty (30) calendar days before
commencing any work on Railway Property. Contractor’s notification to Railway must refer to
Railway's file ___________.
• 1.01.07 For any bridge demolition and/or falsework above any tracks or any excavations
located with any part of the excavations located within, whichever is greater, twentyfive (25)
feet of the nearest track or intersecting a slope from the plane of the top of rail on a 2 horizontal
to 1 vertical slope beginning at eleven (11) feet from centerline of the nearest track, both
measured perpendicular to center line of track, the Contractor must furnish the Railway five
sets of working drawings showing details of construction affecting Railway Property and
tracks. The working drawing must include the proposed method of installation and removal of
falsework, shoring or cribbing, not included in the contract plans and two sets of structural
calculations of any falsework, shoring or cribbing. For all excavation and shoring submittal
plans, the current “BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Temporary Shoring” must be used for
determining the design loading conditions to be used in shoring design, and all calculations
and submittals must be in accordance with the current “BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for
Temporary Shoring”. All submittal drawings and calculations must be stamped by a registered
professional engineer licensed to practice in the state the project is located. All calculations
must take into consideration railway surcharge loading and must be designed to meet
American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association (previously known as
American Railway Engineering Association) Coopers E80 live loading standard. All drawings
and calculations must be stamped by a registered professional engineer licensed to practice
in the state the project is located. The Contractor must not begin work until notified by the
Railway that plans have been approved. The Contractor will be required to use lifting devices
such as, cranes and/or winches to place or to remove any falsework over Railway's tracks. In
no case will the Contractor be relieved of responsibility for results obtained by the
implementation of said approved plans.
• 1.01.08 Subject to the movement of Railway's trains, Railway will cooperate with the
Contractor such that the work may be handled and performed in an efficient manner. The
Contractor will have no claim whatsoever for any type of damages or for extra or additional
compensation in the event his work is delayed by the Railway.
1.02 Contractor Safety Orientation
• 1.02.01 No employee of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents or invitees may enter
Railway Property without first having completed Railway’s Engineering Contractor
136
Safety Orientation, found on the web site www.BNSFContractor.com. The Contractor
must ensure that each of its employees, subcontractors, agents or invitees completes
Railway’s Engineering Contractor Safety Orientation through internet sessions before
any work is performed on the STRUCTURE. Additionally, the Contractor must ensure
that each and every one of its employees, subcontractors, agents or invitees
possesses a card certifying completion of the Railway Contractor Safety Orientation
before entering Railway Property. The Contractor is responsible for the cost of the
Railway Contractor Safety Orientation. The Contractor must renew the Railway
Contractor Safety Orientation annually. Further clarification can be found on the web
site or from the Railway’s Representative.
1.03 Railway Requirements
• 1.03.01 The Contractor must take protective measures as are necessary to keep railway
facilities, including track ballast, free of sand, debris, and other foreign objects and materials
resulting from his operations. Any damage to railway facilities resulting from Contractor's
operations will be repaired or replaced by Railway and the cost of such repairs or replacement
must be paid for by the Agency.
• 1.03.02 The Contractor must notify the Railway's Division Engineer
________________________ at (_____)_________________ and provide blasting plans to
the Railway for review seven (7) calendar days prior to conducting any blasting operations
adjacent to or on Railway's Property.
• 1.03.03 The Contractor must abide by the following temporary clearances during
construction:
15’-0” Horizontally from centerline of nearest track
21’-6” Vertically above top of rail
27'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying less than 750 volts
28'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying 750 volts to 15,000
volts
30'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying 15,000 volts to 20,000
volts
34'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying more than 20,000 volts
• 1.03.04 Upon completion of construction, the following clearances shall be maintained:
--’ Horizontally from centerline of nearest track
_-’ Vertically above top of rail
• 1.03.05 Any infringement within State statutory clearances due to the Contractor's
operations must be submitted to the Railway and to the (Agency) and must not be undertaken
until approved in writing by the Railway, and until the (Agency) has obtained any necessary
authorization from the State Regulatory Authority for the infringement. No extra compensation
will be allowed in the event the Contractor's work is delayed pending Railway approval, and/or
the State Regulatory Authority's approval.
• 1.03.06 In the case of impaired vertical clearance above top of rail, Railway will have the
option of installing tell-tales or other protective devices Railway deems necessary for
137
protection of Railway operations. The cost of tell-tales or protective devices will be borne by
the Agency.
• 1.03.07 The details of construction affecting the Railway's Property and tracks not included
in the contract plans must be submitted to the Railway by (Agency) for approval before work
is undertaken and this work must not be undertaken until approved by the Railway.
• 1.03.08 At other than public road crossings, the Contractor must not move any equipment
or materials across Railway's tracks until permission has been obtained from the Railway. The
Contractor must obtain a "Temporary Construction Crossing Agreement" from the Railway
prior to moving his equipment or materials across the Railways tracks. The temporary crossing
must be gated and locked at all times when not required for use by the Contractor. The
temporary crossing for use of the Contractor will be constructed and, at the completion of the
project, removed at the expense of the Contractor.
• 1.03.09 Discharge, release or spill on the Railway Property of any hazardous substances,
oil, petroleum, constituents, pollutants, contaminants, or any hazardous waste is prohibited
and Contractor must immediately notify the Railway's Resource Operations Center at 1(800)
832-5452, of any discharge, release or spills in excess of a reportable quantity. Contractor
must not allow Railway Property to become a treatment, storage or transfer facility as those
terms are defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act or any state analogue.
• 1.03.10 The Contractor upon completion of the work covered by this contract, must
promptly remove from the Railway's Property all of Contractor's tools, equipment, implements
and other materials, whether brought upon said property by said Contractor or any
Subcontractor, employee or agent of Contractor or of any Subcontractor, and must cause
Railway's Property to be left in a condition acceptable to the Railway's representative.
1.04 Contractor Roadway Worker on Track Safety Program and Safety Action
Plan:
• 1.04.01 Each Contractor that will perform work within 25 feet of the centerline of a track
must develop and implement a Roadway Worker Protection/On Track Safety Program and
work with Railway Project Representative to develop an on track safety strategy as described
in the guidelines listed in the on track safety portion of the Safety Orientation. This Program
must provide Roadway Worker protection/on track training for all employees of the Contractor,
its subcontractors, agents or invitees. This training is reinforced at the job site through job
safety briefings. Additionally, each Contractor must develop and implement the Safety Action
Plan, as provided for on the web site www.BNSFContractor.com, which will be made
available to Railway prior to commencement of any work on Railway Property. During the
performance of work, the Contractor must audit its work activities. The Contractor must
designate an on-site Project Supervisor who will serve as the contact person for the Railway
and who will maintain a copy of the Safety Action Plan, safety audits, and Material Safety
Datasheets (MSDS), at the job site.
• 1.04.02 Contractor shall have a background investigation performed on all of its
employees, subcontractors and agents who will be performing any services for Railroad under
this Agreement which are determined by Railroad in its sole discretion a) to be on Railroad’s
property, or b) that require access to Railroad Critical Infrastructure, Railroad Critical
138
Information Systems, Railroad’s Employees, Hazardous Materials on Railroad’s property or
is being transported by or otherwise in the custody of Railroad, or Freight in Transit involving
Railroad.
The required background screening shall at a minimum meet the rail industry background
screening criteria defined by the e-RAILSAFE Program as outlined at www.everifile.com, in
addition to any other applicable regulatory requirements.
Contractor shall obtain written consent from all its employees, subcontractors or agents
screened in compliance with the e-RAILSAFE Program to participate in the Program on their
behalf and to release completed background information to Railroad’s designee. Contractor
shall be subject to periodic audit to ensure compliance.
Contractor subject to the e-RAILSAFE Program hereunder shall not permit any of its
employees, subcontractors or agents to perform services hereunder who are not first
approved under e-RAILSAFE Program standards. Railroad shall have the right to deny entry
onto its premises or access as described in this section above to any of Contractor's
employees, subcontractors or agents who do not display the authorized identification badge
issued by a background screening service meeting the standards set forth in the e-RAILSAFE
Program, or who in Railroad's opinion, which may not be unreasonable, may pose a threat to
the safety or security of Railroad's operations, assets or personnel.
Contractors shall be responsible for ensuring that its employees, subcontractors and agents
are United States citizens or legally working in the United States under a lawful and
appropriate work VISA or other work authorization.
1.05 Railway Flagger Services:
• 1.05.01 The Contractor must give Railway’s Roadmaster (telephone ________) a
minimum of thirty (30) calendar days advance notice when flagging services will be required
so that the Roadmaster can make appropriate arrangements (i.e., bulletin the flagger’s
position). If flagging services are scheduled in advance by the Contractor and it is
subsequently determined by the parties hereto that such services are no longer necessary,
the Contractor must give the Roadmaster five (5) working days advance notice so that
appropriate arrangements can be made to abolish the position pursuant to union
requirements.
• 1.05.02 Unless determined otherwise by Railway’s Project Representative, Railway flagger
will be required and furnished when Contractor’s work activities are located over, under and/or
within twentyfive (25) feet measured horizontally from centerline of the nearest track and when
cranes or similar equipment positioned beyond 25feet from the track centerline could foul the
track in the event of tip over or other catastrophic occurrence, but not limited thereto for the
following conditions:
• 1.05.02a When, upon inspection by Railway’s Representative, other
conditions warrant.
139
" 1 . 0 5 . 0 2 b W h e n a n y e x c a v a t i o n i s p e r f o r m e d b e l o w t h e b o t t o m o f t i e
e l e v a t i o n , i f , i n t h e o p i n i o n o f R a i l w a y '