Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout11 November 13, 2002 CommissionRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA TIME: 9:00 a.m. DATE: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 LOCATION: CONFERENCE ROOM University of California @ Riverside, University Village 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside Commissioners Chairman: John F. Tavaglione 1St Vice Chairman: Ron Roberts 2"d Vice Chairman: Roy Wilson Bob Buster, County of Riverside John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside James A. Venable, County of Riverside Roy Wilson, County of Riverside Tom Mullen, County of Riverside John Hunt / Jan Wages, City of Banning Placido L. Valdivia / Roger Berg, City of Beaumont Robert Crain / George Thomas, City of Blythe John Chlebnik / Jon Winningham, City of Calimesa Alfred W. Trembly / Jack Wamsley, City of Canyon Lake Gregory S. Pettis / Sarah DiGrandi, City of Cathedral City Juan M. DeLara, City of Coachella Janice L. Rudman/ Jeff Miller, City of Corona Greg Ruppert / Matt Weyuker, City of Desert Hot Springs Robin ReeserLowe / Lori Van Arsdale, City of Hemet Percy L. Byrd / Robert A. Bernheimer, City of Indian Wells Mike Wilson / Gene Gilbert, City of Indio John J. Pena / Terry Henderson, City of La Quinta Robert L. Schiffner / Thomas Buckley, City of Lake Elsinore Frank West / Bonnie Flickinger, City of Moreno Valley Jack F. van Haaster / Warnie Enochs, City of Murrieta Frank Hall / Harvey Sullivan, City of Norco Dick Kelly / Robert Spiegel, City of Palm Desert William G. Kleindienst / Chris Mills, City of Palm Springs Daryl Busch / Mark Yarbrough, City of Perris G. Dana Hobart / Ron Meepos, City of Rancho Mirage Anneal Moore / Joy Defenbaugh, City of Riverside Chris Carlson-Buydos / Jim Conner, City of San Jacinto Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula Anne Mayer, Director, Caltrans District #8 Eric Haley, Executive Director Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director Comments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, H,o'.o VV,%,p,G& VI IV ...VI ,n . I cot,,%wiij, vuiL, iv VIV V IVII • I VIV VIVI,. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, November 13, 2002 CONFERENCE ROOM University of California @ Riverside 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1111 5. PUBLIC HEARING 5A. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-015, "RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQU/RE FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCA TED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, THAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCT/ON OF SOUND WALLS AND RELATED PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, ALONG STATE ROUTE 60, BETWEEN THE EAST JUNCT/ON OF THE STATE ROUTE 60 / 215 INTERCHANGE AND REDLANDS BOULEVARD ON STATE ROUTE 60, IN MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA" Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity; Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 2 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: • i. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-015, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS 291-402-019, 291-431-024, 291-502-005, 292-160-001, 292-160-014, 292-160-015, 292-170-002, 292-170-008, 292-170- 013, 292-170-018, 292-222-016, 292-230-028, 292-250-026, 479- 423-034, 479-423-039, 479-423-040, 477-412-001, 477-412-003, 477-412-004, 477-412-005, 477-531-005, 477-531-006, 477-531- 007, 477-531-008, 477-531-010, 477-531-012, 477-531-013, 477- 531-014, 481-312-001, 481-312-002, 481-312-003, 481-312-004, 481-312-005, 481-312-006, 481-312-007, 481-312-008, 481-312- 009, 481-312-010, 481-312-011, 481-312-012, 481-312-013, 481 1111 - 312-014, 481-312-015, 481-312-016, 481-312-017, 481-312-018 and 481-312-019 (Project Parcel Nos. 19437-1, 19448-1, 19456-1, 19482-1, 19486-1, 19488-1, 19489-1, 19491-1, 19494-1, 19497- 1, 19498-1, 19500-1, 19501-1, 19504-1, 19504-2, 19505-1, 19505-2, 19506-1, 19506-2, 19507-1, 19507-2, 19508-1, 19508- 2, 19509-1, 19509-2, 19510-1, 19510-2, 19511-1, 19511-2, 19512-1, 19512-2, 19513-1, 19513-2, 19514-1, 19514-2, 19515- 1, 19515-2, 19516-1, 19516-2, 19517-1, 19517-2, 19518-1, 19518-2, 19519-1, 19519-2, 19520-1, 19520-2, 19521-1, 19521- 2, 19522-1, 19522-2, 19537-1, 19542-1, 19543-1, 19544-1, 19544-2, 19545-1, 19545-2, 19546-1, 19546-2, 19547-1, 19547- 2, 19550-1, 19551-1, 19552-1, 19553-1, 19555-1, 19557-1, 19558-1 & 19559-1), by Eminent Domain is Necessary for the Construction of Sound Walls and Related Public Infrastructure, Along State Route 60, Between the East Junction of the State Route 60/215 Interchange and Redlands Boulevard on State Route 60, in Moreno Valley, California". Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 3 5B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-014, "RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE REALTY IN CERTA/N REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, THAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE WIDENING, REALIGNMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 74, BETWEEN APPROX/MA TEL Y 1640 FEET EAST OF WASSON CANYON ROAD, IN LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, TO 7TH STREET, IN PERRIS, CALIFORNIA (SEGMENT 2) " Page 113 Overview This item is for the Commission to:. 1) Conduct a public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity. 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: i. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The portions of the real property to, be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain. v. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-014, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Dec/aring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS 342-051- 013, 342-051-007, 342-052-011, 342-052-016, 342-052-018, 342- 052-019, 342-061-007, 342-061-008, 342-062-001, 342-062-002, 342-062-007, 342-100-011, 342-100-012, 342-100-017, 342-100- 018, 342-100-022, 342-100-038, 342-100-048, 342-140-009, 342- 140-010, 342-140-011, 342-140-012, 342-160-001, 342-200- Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 4 032, 342-210-032, 345-070-003, 345-080-046, 345-080-055, 345- ! 080-056, 345-090-003, 345-090-008, 345-200-007, 345-200-010, 345-210-003, 345-220-005, 345-220-019, 345-220-022, 345-220- 061, 345-220-066, 345-220-072, 349-342-006 and 349-342-007. (Project Parcel Nos. 13629-1, 13630-1, 13641-1, 13643-1, 13643- 2, 13647-1, 13649-1, 13650-1, 13653-1, 13654-1, 13661-1, 13663-1, 13684-1, 13714-1, 13714-2, 13718-1, 13724-1, 13730- 1, 13732-1, 13752-1, 13752-2, 13752-3, 13780-1, 13798-1, 13798-2, 13802-1, 13803-1, 13803-2, 13804-1, 13805-1, 13806- 1, 13813-1, 13825-1, 13827-1, 13832-1, 13832-2, 13835-1, 13836-1, 13837-1, 13852-1, 13854-1 and 13858-1), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Widening, Realignment and Improvement of State Route 74, Between Approximately 1640 Feet East of Wasson Canyon Road, in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Segment 2)." 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for 411 9 discussion at the end of the agenda.) 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Page 223 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending September 30, 2002. 7B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Page 227 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the months ending July, August, and September 2002. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 5 7C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 229 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ending September 30, 2002. 7D. COST ALLOCATION PLAN (CAP) Page 232 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Cost Allocation Plan Summary. 7E. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-013, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE COMMISSION'S ANNUAL APPROPRIATION LIMIT' Page 235 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 03-013, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Annual Appropriation Limit'. 7F. WORKSHOP SPONSORSHIP: CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION Page 253 Overview 1) Approve the sponsorship of a workshop at the Spring 2003 Conference of the California Association for Coordinated Transportation; and, 2) Allocate up to $1,500 in Measure "A" Specialized Transportation Funds to cover the cost of sponsoring the workshop. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 6 7G. STATUS OF WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS / SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS INTERSTATE 15 PARTNERSHIP STUDY Page 255 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Western Riverside Council of Governments / San Diego Association of Governments Interstate 15 Partnership Study. 7H. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. M22-002 WITH COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Page 281 Overview • This item is for the Commission to approve a Memorandum of Understanding No. M22-002 between the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) setting forth responsibilities for the administration of the 2002 Measure "A" Sales Tax Program in the Coachella Valley. 71. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-012, "RESOLUTION OF THE R/VERS/DE • COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS BE IDENTIFIED AS THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT OF FEDERAL URBAN/ZED AREA FORMULA FUNDS FOR THE TEMECULA - MURRIETA AND /NDIO - CATHEDRAL CITY - PALM SPRINGS URBANIZED AREAS" Page 287 Overview 1) Adopt Resolution No. 03-012 recommending to the Governor of the State of California that the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) be identified as the Designated Recipient for Federal Transit Administration funds apportioned to the newly combined urbanized area of Indio — Cathedral City — Palm Springs as well as the newly established Temecula — Murrieta urbanized area; and, 2) Direct staff to seek written concurrence from the two transit agencies serving these areas. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 7 7J. FISCAL YEAR 2003 AMENDMENT TO COMMUTER RAIL'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN — ALLOCATION OF STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS Page 291 Overview 1) Reduce the original $1.8 million allocation in State Transit Assistance (STA) Funds for the La Sierra Station Parking Expansion to $1 Million; 2) Allocate $302,100 in STA funds for the completion of the Federal Transit Administration's Alternative Analysis for the San Jacinto Branch Line; 3) Allocate $100,000 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for rail station operating and legal expenses; and, 4) Amend the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) to reflect these changes. 7K. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF MURRIETA Page 293 Overview This item is for the Commission to grant the City of Murrieta a twelve-month extension to June 30, 2003 to complete the Washington Avenue Sidewalk Project. 7L. APPROVAL OF CITY OF TEMECULA'S MULTI -USE TRAILS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN Page 295 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the City of Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan dated January 2002. 7M. AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2002 MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS Page 296 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the FY 2002 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Palm Springs. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 8 7N. FUND TRANSFER AGREEMENT NO. 03-45-034 BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE OPERATION OF A FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Page 299 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Fund Transfer Agreement between the State of California Department of Transportation and the Riverside County Transportation Commission for the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol program in the amount of $1,080,400 in State funding for FY 2002-03; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. 70. AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-033 WITH DMJM + HARRIS FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE STATE ROUTE 60 HOV PROJECT FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES • Page 306 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-31-033 (Amendment No. 9 to Agreement No. RO-2042) for DMJM + Harris to provide engineering design services for the State Route 60 HOV Project Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), for an additional base amount of $116,515; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 9 • 7P. AGREEMENT NO. 03-33-009 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN EMERGENCY PLATFORM EXTENSION AT THE PEDLEY METROLINK STATION Page 315 Overview This item is for the. Commission to: 1) Award Construction Agreement No. 03-03-009 for construction of an Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7Q. AGREEMENT NO. 03-25-032 WITH THE WESTERN AREA SECURITY SERVICES AGREEMENT TO INCLUDE GUARD SERVICES FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA STATION Page 320 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve an amendment to the agreement (Agreement No. 03-25-032, Amendment No. 1 to RO No. 2161) with Western Area Security Services in an amount not to exceed $115,000 to include the addition of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station among the properties they currently provide security services, pursuant to Legal Counsel review. 7R. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 322 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 8. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STIP REPROGRAMMING REQUEST Page 340 Overview This item is for the Commission to consider the Technical Advisory Committee's recommendation and take action on the County of Riverside's request to reprogram STIP Funds on Newport Road to State Route 79. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda November 13, 2002 Page 10 9. HIGHWAY AND COMMUTER RAIL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM UPDATE Page 342 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Highway and Commuter Rail Construction Program Update as an information item. 10. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 11. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. A. Measure "A" Election Results 12. CLOSED SESSION ITEM Overview A. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) Names of Parties: "No on A - No LA", San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society vs. RCTC, County of Riverside, Caltrans, and County Board of Supervisors, Eric Haley Case Number: RCV384012 13. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 11, 2002, Board Room, County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. AGENDA ITEM 4 Minutes • " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, October 9, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chairman John Tavaglione at 9:07 a.m., in the Conference Room at the University of California at Riverside, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Daryl Busch Bob Buster Chris Buydos Percy Byrd John Chlebnik Juan DeLara Frank Hall John Hunt Dick Kelly William G. Kleindienst Robin Lowe Anne Mayer Ameal Moore Tom Mullen Gregory S. Pettis Ron Roberts Janice Rudman Greg Ruppert Robert Schiffner John F. Tavaglione Alfred W. Trembly Placido L. Valdivia James A. Venable Frank West Roy Wilson Commissioners Absent Robert Crain G. Dana Hobart John Pena Jack van Haaster Mike Wilson Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Garry Grant, Meadowbrook area resident, stated his belief that the TUMF will have a negative effect on current and future Riverside County residents, especially low income families. Chairman Tavaglione directed staff to review Garry Grant's concerns and provide a response in writing. B. Bill Alexander and David Solow, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, presented plaques to Commissioner Janice Rudman representing the City of Corona, Commissioner Ameal Moore representing the City of Riverside, Chairman John Tavaglione representing the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Transportation Commission, to commemorate Metrolink's 10th Anniversary. SCRRA Vice Chairman Alexander extended his appreciation to the Commission, the County, and the cities for a successful working relationship. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — September 11, 2002 M/S/C (Lowe/Byrd) to approve the September 11, 2002 minutes as presented. Abstain: Kleindienst, Pettis 5. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board, noted additional information for Agenda Item 8, "Approval of Utility Agreement No. 03-31-023 with Eastern Municipal Water District for Utility Relocation on State Route 60 HOV Project". 6. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Bob Buster requested that Agenda Item No. 6C, "Award Of Section 5313 Grant Funds: Riverside And San Bernardino Counties Non -Emergency Health Access Study", be pulled from the Consent Calendar for discussion. M/S/C (Lowe/Pettis) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 6A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending August 31, 2002. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 3 6B. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 03-14-031, AMENDMENT OF SAN. BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS CONTRACT FOR STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES 1) Approve of Agreement No. 03-14-031, an extension of the shared State Legislative Advocacy Services (SANBAG Contract No. 00-051) between RCTC and SANBAG for a four-year period in an amount not " to exceed $51,750 annually for the first two years and $54,750 annually for the second two years; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 6D. TRANSPORTATION SPECIALISTS, INC. — FISCAL YEARS 2003 AND 2004 SPECIALIZED TRANSIT TWO-YEAR CALL FOR PROJECTS 1) Allocate up to $140,088 in Western Riverside County Measure "A" Specialized Transportation Funds for FY 03 to Transportation Specialists, Inc.; 2) Waive the 50% match requirement for Transportation Specialists, Inc.; 3) Require that a Management Audit be conducted as a condition of funding; and, 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to enter into Funding Agreement No. 03-26-027. 6E. RAIL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT Approve an increase to the appropriation for the Rail Capital Budget. 6F. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 6G. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO 03-45-021 BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE OPERATION OF A CONSTRUCTION FREEWAY SERVICE. PATROL IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute Agreement No. 03-45-021 on behalf of the Commission, with the State of California Department of Transportation for the operation of a Construction Freeway Service Patrol in Riverside County. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 4 6H. APPROVAL OF UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-023 WITH EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR UTILITY RELOCATION ON STATE ROUTE 60 HOV PROJECT 1) Enter into Utility Agreement No. 03-31-023 with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) for sewer construction and relocation as part of the SR 60 HOV Project for an estimated amount of $250,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel Review, to execute the Utility Agreement, on behalf of the Commission. 61. AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR VARIOUS CONTRACT SERVICES FOR THE RELOCATION AND/OR REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES, SEPTIC SYSTEMS AND OTHER ITEMS WITHIN THE PROPOSED SEGMENT 2 STATE ROUTE 74 RIGHT-OF-WAY 1) Authorize staff to advertise and/or solicit bids for various services to relocate and/or remove structures, septic systems and any other improvements within the proposed construction limits of the Segment 2 State Route 74 Right -of -Way; 2) Authorize staff to obtain a minimum of three bids for each contract to be awarded from qualified contractors and recommend the lowest responsive qualified contractor for selection; and, 3) Authorize the Executive Director to enter into one or more agreements on behalf of the Commission with selected contractor(s) to perform the above referenced work. Each individual contract shall have a not to exceed limit of $50,000 and the cumulative total of all contracts is not to exceed $800,000 without further Commission action. 6J. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 03-33-020 WITH ENGINEERING RESOURCES FOR MISCELLANEOUS RIVERSIDE RAIL STATION WORK 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-33-020 (Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 02-33-029) with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. to provide additional final PS&E design services, reimburse the cost for required City of Riverside Permit Fees, and to provide design construction support services for Phase I and Phase II expansion of the Riverside -La Sierra Station Parking Lot, and for the expansion of the Downtown Riverside Station Parking Lot for an additional base amount of $134,040 and additional contingency of $15,960, for a total not to exceed amendment value of $150,000. This brings the total not to exceed agreement value to $499,705; and, 2) Approve a Short Range Transit Plan Amendment to RCTC's Commuter Rail Program for FY 03 and allocate $41,200 of previously allocated Local Transportation Funds for the design of the downtown Riverside Station Parking Lot. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 5 • 7. COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (CVAG) ANNUAL REPORT- PRESENTATION Corky Larson, Executive Director of CVAG, presented the CVAG Annual Report to the Commission and highlighted completed and ongoing Measure "A" Projects in the Coachella Valley. 8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON LOCALLY PREFERRED COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION ACCEPTABILITY PROCESS (CETAP) ALTERNATIVES FOR THE WINCHESTER TO TEMECULA CORRIDOR AND THE HEMET TO CORONAJLAKE ELSINORE CORRIDOR Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development, provided an overview of the staff recommendation on locally preferred CETAP alternatives. Eric Haley, Executive Director, commended Cathy Bechtel on her CETAP efforts. He said that staff recommendations are sequential and that there will be a minimum of two public hearings. Additional hearings may be added by the Commission and. Commissioners will be appointed to the hearing board. At this time, Chairman Tavaglione opened the meeting to public comments: A. Mary Webb, resident of Menifee, stated her belief that the staff preferred alternatives serve that same purpose. She also expressed her concern that these alternatives will only create a more dangerous environment on 1-215. B. Marika Montgomery, resident of Sun City, stated her belief that Cajalco Road should be expanded instead of Alternative 5C that will impact a greater number of property owners that are also low to middle income. C. Fred Twyman, resident of J -Bar Ranch Community, stated his belief that both alternatives accomplish the same purpose and only one route is necessary. D. Brian Baker stated his belief that a more eastern route would be appropriate due to a greater amount of open land that would disrupt fewer residents. E. Marc Miller, resident of Menifee Valley, stated his belief that the alternatives accomplish the same purpose and therefore one only route is necessary. F. Garry Grant, resident of the Meadowbrook Area, expressed his concern that these routes will eliminate the rural areas they dissect and commercial land is being wasted. He also believes other alternatives would traverse less dense areas. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 6 • G. Lupe Perez, resident of Menifee, expressed her concern that there were no public hearing held in the Menifee area and therefore requested one be held there with proper notification to the affected property owners. H. Julie Gagnon, resident of Menifee, presented a 93 -signature petition opposing Alternative 7B. She expressed her concern that this alternative will disfigure Menifee Valley and offer little traffic relief. She also requested a public hearing be held in the Menifee area with proper notification to the affected property owners. I. Peggy Smith, resident of Menifee Valley, expressed her concern that Alternative 7B will adversely affect the quality of life in the Menifee Valley area. She believes one direct route would affect less people. J. William Zeidlik, Chairman of the Land Use Committee of Menifee Valley Community Economic Development Center expressed his opposition to both alternatives and his belief that the public have not properly been informed. K. Kathie Westrope, resident of Murrieta representing the Winchester Hills Property Owners and Rancon Real Estate, expressed a strong opposition to both alternatives due to the negative impact it will have on current residents and future developments. L. Norm Gritton, resident of the Meadowbrook Area, stated his belief that the alternatives are detrimental to the Meadowbrook Community. He believes alternatives in less dense areas should be reviewed. M. Mark Yarbrough, Councilmember for the City of Perris, stated his belief that any alternative will require compromise. He stated his understanding that the Cities of Corona, Riverside, and Moreno Valley have indicated support for the Cajalco/Ramona Alternative. He expressed his concern for the tremendous impact that the staff preferred alternatives will have on the City of Perris. N. Scott Woodward, resident of the Winchester Hills Area and representing Rancon Real Estate, expressed his concern that Alternative 7B will have a serious effect on the viability of Rancon's approved plans for development in this area. O. David Vacinto, resident of Winchester Hills Area,expressed his concern that the alternatives will have a negative effect on the community's effort with the County on Newport Road Project. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 7 There being no further requests to speak on this item, Chairman Tavaglione closed the public comments. Commissioner Robin Lowe requested to amend the proposed recommendation to include a minimum of four to six public hearings held in the areas that would be impacted by the staff recommended alternatives and expanded to a grouping of areas to include Corona, Riverside, Moreno Valley, Perris, Nuevo, San Jacinto Valley, Winchester, Perris, Homeland, Menifee, Sun City, Temecula, Wildomar, and Murrieta for regionalized hearings. Commissioner Janice Rudman requested clarification as to what the public hearings will address and Cathy Bechtel responded that the hearings will focus on the two internal corridors and all of the alternatives being considered for the corridors. Commissioner Bob Buster asked how the public can access summary information on the Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) to compare the advantages and disadvantages concluded by the experts and their own concerns. Cathy Bechtel responded that there is an Executive Summary of each EIR. Also, detailed presentations have made to the CETAP Advisory Committee to explain RCIP Hotline. Commissioner Tom Mullen stated that the public hearings are critically important and that they should be held December 2002 through January 2003. Commissioner Robert Schiffner requested that a map that includes both alternatives and the staff reasoning for the selected alternatives be available to the Public Hearings Board Members prior to the hearings to which Cathy Bechtel said that staff will provide the information. M/S/C (Hall/Rudman) to: 1) Receive the presentation on the staff recommended locally preferred CETAP alternatives for the two internal corridors. The recommended alternatives are 7b for the Winchester to Temecula corridor with complementary north -south arterial roadways, and 5c for the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore corridor with complementary east -west arterial roadways; 2) Direct staff to return with a schedule of at least four to six public hearings; 3) Direct staff to work with the Federal and State agencies to reach consensus on the locally preferred alternative for each corridor; and, 4) Return to the Commission when ready to consider certifying the environmental documents for each corridor. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 8 Commissioner Lowe requested that staff, prior to the public hearings, to have the County provide the approved plans under each alternative. Commissioner Mullen requested staff to initiate each hearing with the overlays as to how everything is integrated and include County staff to answer any questions regarding the overlays at the hearings. 9. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR 6C. AWARD OF SECTION 5313 GRANT FUNDS: RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES NON -EMERGENCY HEALTH ACCESS STUDY Commissioner Buster requested that Riverside and San Bernardino Counties be included in the study of non -emergency transportation needs. Commissioner Mullen requested that the addition be expedited as not to hold up any contracts. M/S/C (Buster/Mullen) to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. M22-001 between RCTC and the San Bernardino Associated Governments, Inland Health Plan, Molina Healthcare of California, Kaiser Permanente, Health Net of California, and Community Hospital of San Bernardino for a study of non - emergency transportation needs in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties and include Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Emergency Services; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the MOU, on behalf of the Commission; and, 3) Allocate $11,000 in Western Riverside County Measure "A" Specialized Transportation funds as RCTC's share of the local non-federal match. 10. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR A. Chairman Tavaglione announced the Governor's appointment of Joseph Tavaglione to the California Transportation Commission. B. Eric Haley reported that: The Riverside County Transportation Commission is the only transportation agency in California to receive the highest rating from Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's. These ratings will allow the Commission with the best interest rates for future borrowing. • • 411 Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes September 11, 2002 Page 9 ii. AB 1010 has been signed by the Governor. Meetings are being scheduled for November to begin to work on the toll -related issues on SR 91 and new corridors. 11. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) Names of Parties: RCTC, County of Riverside, Caltrans, and California Private Transportation Company Case Number: RCV048430 and RCV049988 B. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) Significant exposure to litigation to subdivision (b): Number of Potential Cases: 15 C. Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Pursuant to Section 54956.8 Negotiating parties: Agency: Deputy Executive Director, Riverside County Transportation Commission Property owner: Fred G. Kramer and Tammy M. Kramer, Trustees of the Kramer Family Trust dated May 21, 1990 Assessor's Parcel Number: 349-100-005 There were no announcements on the Closed Session items. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:50 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at the Conference Room, University of California at Riverside, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, California, 92501. Respectfully submitted, Naty Kopenhaver Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM 5A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 03-015, "Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee and Easement Interests in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, by Eminent Domain, that is Necessary for the Construction of Sound Walls and Related Public Infrastructure, Along State Route 60, Between the East Junction of the State Route 60/215 Interchange and Redlands Boulevard on State Route 60, in Moreno Valley, California" STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing alt interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity; 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: i. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. Theproperty to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-015, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS 291-402-019, 291-431-024, 291-502-005, 292-160-001, 292-160-014, 292-160- 015, 292-170-002, 292-170-008, 292-170-013, 292-170-018, 292- 222-016, 292-230-028, 292-250-026, 479-423-034, 479-423-039, 479-423-040, 477-412-001, 477-412-003, 477-412-004, 477-412- 005, 477-531-005, 477-531-006, 477-531.007, 477-531-008, 477- 531-010, 477-531-012, 477-531-013, 477-531-014, 481-312-001, 481-312-002, 481-312-003, 481-312-004, 481-312-005, 481 -312 - Item 5A 0000 ` 1 006, 481-312-007, 481-312-008, 481-312-009, 481-312-010, 481- 312-011, 481-312-012, 481-312-013, 481-312-014, 481-312-015, 481-312-016, 481.312-017, 481-312-018 and 481-312-019 (Project Parcel Nos. 19437-1, 19448-1, 19456-1, 19482-1, 19486-1, 19488-1, 19489-1, 19491-1, 19494-1, 19497-1, 19498-1, 19500-1, 19501-1, 19504-1, 19504-2, 19505-1, 19505-2, 19506-1, 19506-2, 19507-1, 19507-2, 19508-1, 19508-2, 19509-1, 19509-2, 19510-1, 19510-2, 19511-1, 19511-2, 19512-1, 19512-2, 19513-1, 19513-2, 19514-1, 19514-2, 19515-1, 19515-2, 19516-1, 19516-2, 19517-1, 19517-2, 19518-1, 19518-2, 19519-1, 19519-2, 19520-1, 19520-2, 19521-1, 19521-2, 19522-1, 19522-2, 19537-1, 19542-1, 19543-1, 19544-1, 19544-2, 19545-1, 19545-2, 19546-1, 19546-2, 19547-1, 19547-2, 19550-1, 19551-1, 19552-1, 19553-1, 19555-1, 19557-1, 19558-1 & 19559-1), by Eminent Domain is Necessary for the Construction of Sound Walls and Related Public Infrastructure, Along State Route 60, Between the East Junction of the State Route 60/215 Interchange and Redlands Boulevard on State Route 60, in Moreno Valley, California" BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The State Route 60 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) median -widening project is a - Measure "A" project from the East Junction Route SR -60/I-215 to Redlands Boulevard in Moreno Valley. The project will add an HOV lane in each direction of travel on State Route 60 in Moreno Valley. Additionally, numerous noise barriers will be constructed in various locations along the current right of way in order to mitigate for potential increase in traffic noise associated with the creation of the high occupancy vehicle lanes between Day Street and Redlands Boulevard. The offers have not been accepted to date, however negotiations are ongoing and will continue. The negotiations are not precluded by the holding of the hearing or the Commission's approval of a resolution of necessity. It may be necessary to acquire some or all of the parcels described in Exhibit "A" by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is the approval of a resolution of necessity. Prior to approving a resolution of necessity, the Commission must give each person whose property is to be acquired, and whose name and address appears on the last equalized County Tax Assessor's roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on: 1. whether the public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. whether the proposed project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 0,01M i512 " " 3. whether the acquisition of the real property is necessary for the project; and, 4. whether the required offers to acquire the real property have been made. Note: The fair market value of the property is not an issue at the hearing. The notice must be mailed by first class mail and state the intent of the Commission to consider the approval of the resolution, the right of each person to appear and be heard on these issues, and that the failure to file a written request to appear will result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission must then hold a hearing at which all persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed may appear and be heard. The required notice was mailed to the property owners, identified in Exhibit "A", on October 29, 2002. DISCUSS/ON: The following addresses the four findings that are required for approval of the resolution of necessity: (1) THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE PROPOSED PROJECT State Route 60 is functionally classified as an Urban Principal Arterial used primarily for interregional travel between San Bernardino, Riverside and Los Angeles counties. It is a major truck route with 11 percent trucks during the peak hour, and it is included in the National Network for Federal Surface Transportation Assistance Act for oversized trucks. The traffic volume on SR 60 exceeds the capacity of the freeway during peak hours in this area due to population growth in Moreno Valley, as well as to changes in land use. The level of service will continue to deteriorate resulting in increased traffic delays and accidents without any improvements to the freeway. The proposed road improvements include construction of one HOV lane in the existing median in each direction, decking of Frederick Street/Pigeon Pass Road and Heacock Street undercrossing structures, reconstruction of the Perris Boulevard undercrossing structures and the construction of sound walls adjacent to residential properties along the corridor primarily from Day Street to Redlands Boulevard. Item 5A 0000 3 ( . ; _ t ea (2) THE PROJECT IS PLANNED OR LOCATED IN A MANNER THAT WILL BE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH THE GREATEST PUBLIC GOOD AND THE LEAST PRIVATE INJURY The roadway alignment follows the existing alignment since the HOV lanes will be constructed within the inside median. The proposed project conforms to the Transportation System Development Plan and is consistent with the Air Quality Management District requirement that HOV lanes be considered on future widening projects. (3) THE ACQUISITION OF THE PARCELS ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT The partial acquisition of parcels and temporary construction easements are required in order to mitigate for the additional noise impacts for the construction of the HOV lanes. All of the affected property owners were given the opportunity to vote in favor or to object to the construction of soundwalls adjacent to their respective properties. (4) THE OFFERS OF JUST COMPENSATION HAVE BEEN MADE Appraisals were prepared by Donahue & Company to establish the fair market value of the fee and easement interests that RCTC is seeking to acquire. The Commission - reviewed the results of the original appraisals at the August 15, and September 11, 2002 Commission meetings. The Commission directed staff to transmit the approved offers of just compensation to the property owners. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the fee and easement interests as established by the approved appraisals and as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible for the property cited above, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the fee and easement interests through eminent domain to ensure that access and the necessary property rights will be available to meet the critical time frames associated with the development of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no new fiscal impact from this action. The Commission approved the current budget for the subject State Route 60 HOV median widening project at the February 2002 Commission meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Based on the 1994 Project Report, the project was determined to be Categorically Exempt under Class 1 of the State CEQA guidelines and Categorically Excluded under NEPA. The Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) Determination for the project was originally completed on August 12, 1993. An updated CE/CE Determination, a CE Re -Evaluation and supporting technical studies were prepared and fs kern5A 0000 I processed in conjunction with a Supplemental Project Report for environmental clearance of the proposed project. The updated CE/CE Determination for the project was approved on May 23, 2002. The technical studies prepared to support the updated CE/CE Determination were the following: • Air Quality Assessment • Noise Analysis • Initial Site Assessment Update • Visual Impacts Study • Natural Environmental Study • Preliminary Environmental Study NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The notice of this public hearing was mailed on October 29, 2002 (15 days prior to meeting) to each property owner of record. Attachment: Resolution of Necessity No. 03-015 Item 5A 0000 5 " " " RESOLUTION NO. 03-015 "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DECLARING THAT THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT INTERESTS IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APNS 291-402-019, 291-431- 024, 291-502-005, 292-160-001, 292-160-014, 292-160-015, 292- 170-002, 292-170-008, 292-170-013, 292-170-018, 292-222-016, 292-230-028, 292-250-026, 479-423-034, 479-423-039, 479-423- 040, 477-412-001, 477-412-003, 477-412-004, 477-412-005, 477- 531-005, 477-531-006, 477-531-007, 477-531-008, 477-531-010, 477-531-012, 477-531-013, 477-531-014, 481-312-001, 481-312- 002, 481-312-003, 481-312-004, 481-312-005, 481-312-006, 481- 312-007, 481-312-008, 481-312-009, 481-312-010, 481-312-011, 481-312-012, 481-312-013, 481-312-014, 481-312-015, 481-312- 016, 481-312-017, 481-312-018 AND 481-312-019 (PROJECT PARCEL NOS. 19437-1, 19448-1, 19456-1, 19482-1, 19486-1, 19488-1, 19489-1, 19491-1, 19494-1, 19497-1, 19498-1, 19500-1, 19501-1, 19504-1, 19504-2, 19505-1, 19505-2, 19506-1, 19506-2, 19507-1, 19507-2, 19508-1, 19508-2, 19509-1, 19509-2, 19510-1, 19510-2, 19511-1, 19511-2, 19512-1, 19512-2, 19513-1, 19513-2, 19514-1, 19514-2, 19515-1, 19515-2, 19516-1, 19516-2, 19517-1, 19517-2, 19518-1, 19518-2, 19519-1, 19519-2, 19520-1, 19520-2, 19521-1, 19521-2, 19522-1, 19522-2, 19537-1, 19542-1, 19543-1, 19544-1, 19544-2, 19545-1, 19545-2, 19546-1, 19546-2, 19547-1, 19547-2, 19550-1, 19551-1, 19552-1, 19553-1, 19555-1, 19557-1, 19558-1 & 19559-1) BY EMINENT DOMAIN IS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOUND WALLS AND RELATED PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE, ALONG STATE ROUTE 60, BETWEEN THE EAST JUNCTION OF THE STATE ROUTE 60/215 INTERCHANGE AND REDLANDS BOULEVARD ON STATE ROUTE 60, IN MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA" WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee and temporary construction easement interests in certain real property, located in Riverside County, California, more particularly described as APNS 291-402-019, 291-431-024, 291-502-005, 292-160- 001, 292-160-014, 292-160-015, 292-170-002, 292-170-008, 292-170-013, 292- 170-018, 292-222-016, 292-230-028, 292-250-026, 479-423-034, 479-423-039, 479-423-040, 477-412-001, 477-412-003, 477-412-004, 477-412-005, 477-531- 005, 477-531-006, 477-531-007, 477-531-008, 477-531-010, 477-531-012, 477 - Item 5A O'r tJa. 6. 531-013, 477-531-014, 481-312-001, 481-312-002, 481-312-003, 481-312-004, 481-312-005, 481-312-006, 481-312-007, 481-312-008, 481-312-009, 481-312- 010, 481-312-011, 481-312-012, 481-312-013, 481-312-014, 481-312-015, 481- 312-016, 481-312-017, 481-312-018 and 481-312-019 (Project Parcel Nos. 19437- 1, 19448-1, 19456-1, 19482-1, 19486.1, 19488-1, 19489-1, 19491-1, 19494-1, 19497-1, 19498-1, 19500-1, 19501-1, 19504-1, 19504-2, 19505-1, 19505-2, 19506-1, 19506-2, 19507-1, 19507-2, 19508-1, 19508-2, 19509-1, 19509-2, 19510-1, 19510-2, 19511-1, 19511-2, 19512-1, 19512-2, 19513-1 19513-2, 19514-1, 19514-2, 19515-1, 19515-2, 19516-1, 19516-2, 19517-1, 19517-2, 19518-1, 19518-2, 19519-1, 19519-2, 19520-1, 19520-2, 19521-1, 19521-2, 19522-1, 19522-2, 19537-1, 19542-1, 19543-1, 19544-1, 19544-2, 19545-1, 19545-2, 19546-1, 19546-2, 19547-1, 19547-2, 19550-1, 19551-1, 19552-1, 19553-1, 19555-1, 19557-1, 19558-1 & 19559-1), by eminent domain is necessary for the construction of sound walls and related public infrastructure, along State Route 60, between the east junction of the State Route 60/215 Interchange and Redlands Boulevard on State Route 60, in Moreno Valley, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 9:00 a.m., at Chancellor's Conference Room, University Village, 1201 - University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission and each person whose property is to be acquired by eminent domain was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for which the fee and temporary construction easement interests are to be acquired is the construction of sound walls and related public infrastructure, along State Route 60, between the east junction of the State Route 60/215 Interchange and Redlands Boulevard on State Route 60, in Moreno Valley, California, pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire by eminent domain property necessary for such purposes. Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the plats of the real property to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identi- fication. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; _ (c) The property described in Exhibit "A" is necessary for the proposed project; and (d) The offers required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code were made. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use(s). Some or all of the fee and temporary construction easement interests in real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights -of -way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights -of -way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Item 5A 0000 Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or alt of the fee and temporary construction easement interests in real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the fee and temporary construction easement interests in real property being acquired that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described fee and temporary construction easements in real property in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action or other proceedings or transaction required to acquire the subject real property. Counsel is further authorized to make such change in the legal descriptions to acquire permanent easements in fee title if these easements had been for purposes of the offers of just compensation previously valued as if they were fee acquisitions. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 13th day of November, 2002. John F. Tavaglione, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • Definitions of Legal Rights to be Acquired • • "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, refers to complete or absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement," refers to the right of plaintiff, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project as referred to in the complaint, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with the exercise of any of the easement rights. Prior to termination of this easement, property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, nor shall property owners plant any tree or trees or plant any other_ vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of plaintiff. Plaintiff shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time as plaintiff determines in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation to property owners. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under, or over this easement without obtaining the prior written consent of plaintiff. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not be for less than twenty four (24) months - from the commencement of construction on the applicable parcel and not more than thirty (30) months of the date possession of the applicable parcel as authorized by court order. RV1171KLR\611138 0U00 0 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement KINROSS LANE 1:500 • r— ray_. „. ..- - "' 1 —, ' ' ,-- % ! - - - \ rE. 1 i r — X' i!, i 94 9943 I \sueI ;TEMP. CONST. Is r EASEMENT 79.2 m2 E� (853 ft)07- `I • ! /->``-, pM .4. 1 ' -----1-,9-;-8-12 m —."-`(65' ) i r. OUND WALL-- 24 _..._ ... I\ ROUTE 60. DMj I:HARRIS 899 0"ea 6d i Cwflry Rd u mqe C TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 24 APN 291-502-005 (NO 01 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Is — BALT I MARE AVE E 1954642 20. 03 m (65. 7' ) 1: 00 / 7 V i \ i PROP. R/W 10.93 m _(35.9' ) Pr SOUND WALL 274 f-1 S ? H DMjMCC RRAD gggggg 866 " Qrfpe La 92�y Rd 0000 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 274 APN 477-412-004 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 274 APN 477-412-005 - • 1-k tit �` • 1 r i 1 .1 r , 1 -, ' ti ,1 /,. 1 t C y- ! j 19448-1 TEMP. CONST. i 1, EASEMENT 1' 1 54.9 mZ i �- (541 f t) �X sae,. i� ` 1 - -�• i `� _t ,' 3 / \\ y.Tit -- i- , — __ f._� •, (l `mot._=.._..-�_ .. .. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ` ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 24 APN 291-431-024 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 1: 500 KINROSS LANE —77. 777 7177-7 - - ,' • 2 9450-1 \ f;-4.1 +I�_ r t r .! 4-3. I I' il if li z i i , •-.. •-• �:�• .: 1 ._/ '` - r; ?ate a _ � - K_ f �` TEMP, CONST. EASEMENT i 74.7 m=tl ,, � r .. i ... . ,, i - ^,, Ems:-.. 8-168 I► =-----�4 lam' �/ ra -^--- -,! - ROUTE 60 SOUS - J L.. 24 DMIM:: 99gg99 t 92856 Ord CCo. ry R0. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT - ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 24 APN 291-431-026 000015 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement KINROSS LANE 6945q7) c_ ROUTE 60 29 SOUNb WALL 24 1: 500 DMJM::Hy RCCBI OrmQe Ca 9ZOW r TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 24 APN 291-402-019 f ... \3426\present\tce\24tce4020! 9. dpn I DATE PLOTTED •J 07/24/2002 00006 I CU 00000 IEA 463601' txruoIt --A-- Temporary Construction Easement 1 I:500 K1NROSS LANE 30 SOUND WALL 24 EXHIBIT "A" Dmj�� j{; J—' — 999 fom a1,rose it> t Dana c TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 24.. i y APN 291-402-013 \3426\present\tce\24tce4020r3. dqn 'DATE PLOTTED •> 07/24/2002 Icu 00000 0000 176' Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 9466-) TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 81.2 mz E^ (874 ft=) o o - or 7 20.225m (66. 4' ) 20. 394 m (66. 9' ) fL ROUTE 60 KINROSS LANE SOUND WALL 24 EXHIBIT "A" 00S :1 DMJM::HALR 000018 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 24 A P N 291-402-009 --.\3 \preseni\tce\24Uce4T02 O9.dgn '0*!E PLOT TEO •> 07/24/2002 1 CU 00000 1E4 463601 " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement KINROSS LANE TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 95.0 m2 (1,023 ftz) E oQ o�� o_ 16.995 m (62.3 - c_ ROUTE 60 SOUND WALL 24 1: 500 " 32 EXHIBIT "A" DMJM::HA RI ca ece`' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 24 00001 APN 291-402-003 \3426\present\fce\24tce402003. dpn 0AtE PLOTTED " > 07/24/2002 Cu 00000 f1FA463601 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SO:U.NDWALL 24 APN 291-861-0.32 ...‘306441 ce361032.62n jGATE PLOTTED •) 07/24/2002 1 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 09482 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT SOUND WALL 232 ROUTE 60 I .- 238 EXHIBIT "A" DMJMCCI ARRI mew or TEMPORARY CONSTR oT1O ROUTE 60 - S:O j (GALL EASEMENT2 U AAPN 292- �,,O_O.20 Present\+c \ 37 on DATE PLO TETEO •> 07/24/2002 al 00000 EA4636O1 _J E: 1 SOUND WALL_ 2.40_ - • - Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 9466-1 TEMP. CONS'. ,^ • - • E-ASEMENT 16p. 0 in (2.924 ft! 26.719m ROUTE 6 is 500 242 EXHIBIT "A" DMJMI1. ARRIS , at" "°. A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT • ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 240 APN 292-222-016 �N26�preaent co co 000022 E OTT 0 00/02/2002 CU 00000 (EA 463601 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 1:501 • (E.. •oZD \O . "Q4D NY -----t---------- / ; 9489) ,TEMP. CONST. +. : EASEMENT' :- 'f 94.1 m` (1.013 ft5: 47.055 m (154.4%1 ,• .: SOUND WALL X40 `ROUTE 60. 1 A EXHIBIT "A" 244 DWI:HARRISrum wrimt TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 240 APN 202-170-002 presen ce ATE PLOTTED .) OA/02/2002 CU 00000 EA 463601 ------------ Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement C 9488`) TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 94.1 m` (1,013 ft') AT.055 mi (1 4L ROUTE 60 SOUND. WALL 240 EffiIBIT "A" DIVIJME • 000023_ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 240 APN 292-170-018 ..\3426‘presenAtce\24 tCOUOO18.dunIDATE PLOTTED •f 08/02/2002 ICU00006 IEA"t636bi L./MUM A Temporary Construction Easement HEMLOCK AVE 244 EXHIBIT "A" SOUND- WALL 240 i ROUTE 60 1 AA i• DMJIVIIIHARRIS aunt wiry id - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 240 APN 292-170-017 ...\3426\presenf\fce\240fce170017.don 1 DATE PLOTTED ) 06/0212002 000025 CU 00000 EA 463601 r Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement JJH i i •9491 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT .(904 f?) (8.367 m (60.3'). SOUND WALL 240 OUTE 60. EXHIBIT "A" 1:500 245 DMJMC:HARRIS awn.? wri TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 240 API* 202-170-013 presen 000026 ce ce LO 1 0 •> 08/02'200 CU 00000 EA 46360( • " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 19494-I  1 TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT ." " 215.4 rt1` (2139 ft=) 47.107 m 1154.6'1_ 0.1 S0UN0 rata 240 1:500 ROUTE �04 246 4 DM: EXHIBIT"A" ~� ` Scrim. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 240 APN 282-170-008 ca OflEO .) 09/02/2002 CU 00000 EA 463601 A V PtYCr0 2 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 1: 500 A =' ROUTE'60___ 24.3. . i SOUND WALL 241 .___,/ ' 4b. i279m 7,›.-....,..::_6-- ' (154. I ) i o tn.; i • .4. TE P CON5T. IF EMEN7 70. 5,m' (759,"ft2) DMJMC: -41 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 241 APN 292-230-028 \ ZA9C\ nrocnn+\+..n\ �+rn9 Ann nArc otnrrrn _♦ n7,7, /7nn9 1r11 nnnnn 1CA AGTGAI Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 1: 500 0 Ll A Y A A ROBE -60 1 V v 243 • i E • / /. SOUND WALL 241\ 46.:79 (154. 1 i i . XL L FOIE..-CONStT. -� EASEMENT Td.5 m` (:759 ft�)° • 11 i DMJMEHARRIS IMP TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION. EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 241 AP N 292-160-001 . 000029 \3426\present\tce\241tce 160001. don [DATE PLOTTED -> OT/24/2002 1 CU 00000 ItA 46'.1(601 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement RIV ASPH 1: 500 - 6C DtK ASPH 5 < • 7.620 m SOUND WALL 245 1 �Z-t//. 9.549 m (31.3') bh o •' TEMP. CONS ; `��..:" i EASEMENT 17. ?in': (18% ft=) DMJMISHARAI 060030 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION.. EASEMENT ROUTE 60- SOUNDWALL 245 APN 292-160-014 "\3426\oresent\tce\243tce1 )014.dgn1DATE P1077ED •> 07/24/2002 1 CU 00000 SEA 463601 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 1: 500 • i K i V - •Fi 1 ROUT E 60 irs 245 ASPH RI - 60 DiiKE r-- SPH DMJMIIHARRE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 246 APN 202-160-016 000081 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 44 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said corner being on the easterly line of Indian Street, variable in width, as shown on said Tract, said corner also being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said. Lot and the easterly line of said Indian Street, North 05° 24' 08" West, 5.081 meters (16.67 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 86° 52' 47" East, 44.939 meters (147.44 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 03° 54' 55" East, 4.027 meters (13.21 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 03° 54' 55" West, 4.027 meters (13.21 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot andsaid northerly line, North 88° 10' 36" West, 44.142 meters (144.82 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 201.7 square meters (2,171 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60 and Indian Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60-25.55 -19504 (19504-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described the Professional - ' urvey• A on, in conformance with • 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. OA W64 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAA 1409) 941-0891 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTA1R GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 19504-1 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DECft i���033 TEMPORARY T- CONST. / EASEMENT / T/3.-9 1926 ft 43.336 m �l (142.2') TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT - ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 264 ASPN: 461-312-019 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 43 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 03° 54' 55" East, 4.027 meters (13.21 feet) to the beginning ,of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 86° 52' 47" East, 8.620 meters (28.28 feet) to the beginning of Course "B"; thence easterly along "Course "B", South 88° 31' 19" East, 11.294 meters (37.05 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 00° 27' 52" East, 3.700 meters (12.14 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 00° 27' 52" West, 3.700 meters (12.14 feet) to said southeasterly comer of said Lot, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly tine of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 01° 20' 01" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 42' 18" an arc length of 13.443 meters (44.10 feet); thence continuing along said southerly and northerly line, North 88° 10' 36" West, 6.705 meters (22.00 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 76.4 square meters (822 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60-25.60 -19505 (19505-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property h. been describe:y me, or under y d ection, in conformance with the Professional Sury - 0000'3 POOH SCALE: 1:500 t LOT ( PO�L 1646.7 3 SHEET 2 OF 2 __ `j `,'` _ r\ r / T/ C PACE DRIVE = -o 44. 8 o °r' E co co N I/ GT NO LOT 44 1643. 0 1640. 7 1 647C E "A" BEGIN COURSE "A" SW'LY COR LOT 43 PN 481-312-018 S86'52'4 8.620 (28.281 588' 3PI9"E 1294m (37.051 3A43m tY UtE of _mu C0� ALFOR IA REC.12-20-54 LOT 42 1647.0 COURSE "B" 3.TOOm 02.141 Qtc._181 L OUT€ 60645.0 —1642.1 THE BEARINGS Ate DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 f0 OBTAII GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Assodated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. MOM 980-:982 1FAXG (909/ 941-0091 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY 08. RIVERSIDE 60 KB.OPOST 20.48/32.T6 PARCEL`No.s 19505-1 SQUARE FEET/ 822 SQUARE "ETERS( 76.4 PARCEL 19505-1 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8�}o-) 3-G " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement " ST R/W PACE DR 19.659 m (64. 5' ) x 25_6 ROP. R/W SOUND WALL 254 1: 500 --- H - c 77T- . C; y _' 000037 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 264 APN 481-312-016 DATE PLOTTED ..> 07/25/2002 CU 00000 IEA 463601 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 42 of 'Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 00° 27' 52" East, 3.700 meters (12.14 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 88° 31' 19" East, 18.300 meters (60.04 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 00° 27' 52" East, 3.808 meters (12.49 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 00° 27' 52" West, 3.808 meters (12.49 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerlyy having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet) a radial line through said point bears . North 02° 17' 36" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 57' 35" an arc length of 18.302 meters (60.05 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 68.2 square meters (734 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any -and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60- 25.61-19506 (19506-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been describe y• y me, or under y direction, in conformance with the Professional •f. urveyo Signature Date 000038 Y* SCALE: LOT 1647.0 1641.2 • i I : 500 4 Na' 2Q01_'E j • 1645. ATAT-E LOT 42 APN 418-312-017 1647. 0 COURSE "A" S88' 3N19"E 19.300m (60.04') ° =00"5r35" 641m : 4.Tr! SIWLY CDR / 1�18.302m S'1 000039 Associated Engineers, Inc: I31•EAST SIEL0 `STREET ONTARIO. OR NTM TEL IKM$ 041982 FAX( (909) H -0Q91 DISTRICT OS COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOSF RIVERSIDE 60 20A8/3ZrT& 1 SHEET 2 OF 2 P 3 fi4 1 OT .40 48. 8 4 1Ri 1643.2 TO STA C.12-20-54 -'-- — 1 647. 22 -60 1647 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1913 ZONE ( MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006555 TO OBTA GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL 195044 PARCEL Nu 19506-1 SOMME FEETg T34 P ,AT Ta L GAL =,EIS tam watt set , i ,�����•• i 'GP, r Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement r E^ 0— cJ PACE DR 4 1,95 , 66_ TEMP RARY CO ST. EASE ENT 73.3 m (-790 ftt) 18.394 m (60.3' ) 1 t 1.: 500 • _ - -- ��./ SOUND WALL 2 4-21 J . 22 . ROUTE' 6 0. X5-6 -� ---� DMNE spy° t 000040 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 264. APN 481-312-017 ... \Dresenf\+ce254+c&3I 2 17 (37 _ Ann 1 fATI PI orTcn .) m/7a/7nm 1 m1 nnnnn 1c. ICtGnI EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 41 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 00° 27' 52" East, 3.808 meters (12.49 feet) to the beginning of Course "A", thence easterly along said Course "A", South 88° 31' 19" East, 15.626 meters (51.27 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 08° 09' 01" East, 4.154 meters (13.63 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 08° 09' 01" West, 4.154 meters (13.63 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet) a radial line through said point bears North 03° 05' 03" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line and said curve through a.central angle of 00° 47' 27" an arc length of 15.080 meters (49.47 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Sheet 1 of 2 Containing approximately 60.7 square meters (653 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property,- in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60-25.62 -19507 (19507-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described b me, or under my di - ction, in conformance with the Professional , • urveyor Signature Date 000041 fS07-,.ex SHEET 2 OF 2 • SCALE: 1: 5001- 8 /r l LOT 43 _ Sw1Y coR NO2' IT'36"E 1645.0 LO APN 481-312-01 1 60 - IL ti N\c)0345'W3"E C 164 BK►J668/242; O.R. f 64 °54411647.2 Associated Engineers, Inc. 33111 EAST SNp;811 STREET ONTARIO. CA 9(764 TEL. (9091900-1982 FAXs (9091941-08911 AREA 1 i THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASEDA ON THE CALFORNIA 6. I�IIILTWLY DISTANCES WAN BSYSTEM00006355OF 5 7'ZONE GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. DISTRICT COUNTY. ROUTE` KtOPOST OS RIVERSIDE 60 20.48%32"76 PARCEL. Nom I950T4 SQUARE FEET, 653 SQUARE METERS 60.T PARCEL 19500 O O 4 2 PLAT T6} 'ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement PACE DR g950T1-P 1 TEMPORARY CONST. EASEMENT 63.6 m 1 (685 ft5 ii i_ L - ROUTE 60 f R/W SOUND WALL�54 EXIST. R/W 5_6 A -1 �_ ^ DMJMIlw • 000043 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 264 APN 481-312-016 nro con nn♦ i� tnn nn n•tC o1 ATTCfl .♦ nn,nc innn� Sheet 1 of 2 • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 40 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 08° 09' 01" East, 4.154 meters (13.63 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 88° 31' 19" East, 3.892 meters (12.77 feet) to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 500.000 meters (1640.42 feet), said beginning point being the beginning of Course "B"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "6" through a central angle of 01° 38' 55" an arc length of 14.386 meters (47.20 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.623 meters (15.17 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.623 meters (15.17 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet) a radial line through said point bears North 04° 02' 02" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 57' 00" an arc length of 18.114 meters (59.43 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 79.8 square meters (859 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.65 -19508 (19508-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property h . • een de the Professional . n'. Sury Signature Date by ; or un .1 `r m • ••—s 7"" S. 4430 Expir • 9 .1 05 ekvowounoovoommorsournotatasomix irection, In conformance with 000044 SHEET 2 OF 2 1 11 COURSE "A" S88' 3119"E 3.892m 02.77 BEGIN COURSE "A" 4-2V 0— 1641. 22 -- 1642. 1 ACE DT? A, 0I' 38'55" R=500.000m I640.42') L=M.386m (47.20') Nt . .,. ..» T6- 6TJl CALFORNIA 16 4 7 . .1s ��v -STATE— ROUTE 60 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE MUI_-T�J Y DIST SHORNIA OWN TE BY 1.0000 35580 ZONE AIN GRol= LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. AREA 331 EAST f1ELeY STREET ONTARIO. CA BT6 p:E9,'E1C r 19508 TEL !7091100962 FAX. (9071$41-0111 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KI A POST SQUARE FEETi 859 oe RIVERSIDE 60 20.46/32.76 , IBM T9y • PARCEL 1950E910 0 04 5 PACE DR 000048 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement • 4 _ /- A -7 v• f ■ DI�ZJMC. roust or TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 254 APN 481-312-016 (lr'A Rsxnt\tnn\7 ntr'a nrs n•Tc 0I nT ,nc ,enn., Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 39 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.623 meters (15.17 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 500.00 meters (1640.42 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 03° 07' 36" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said "Course "A" through a central angle of 01° 40' 20" an arc length of 14.592 meters (47.87 feet) to the beginning point of compound curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 04° 47' 55" East, said beginning point being the beginning of Course "B"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "B" through a central angle of 00° 11' 51" an arc length of 3.783 meters (12.41 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.739 meters (15.55 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.739 meters (15.55 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 04° 59' 49" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 57' 46" an arc length of 18.363 meters (60.25 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.1 square meters (927 square feet). This conveyance Is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property In and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.67 -19509 (19509-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described • me, or under m Professional Land S yor's Signature o m • •; • S. 4430 res 9/30/0 Date on, in conformance with the 000.047 SHEET 2 OF 2 r CE DRIVE — —_ . 1643.2 OB SW'LY CO 4� c N04' 02'02"E (R) / 1 647. 22-- 1647.2 ia -N S INE OF GRANT DEED_ ------�ER B� ZTE OF C�ORMA -- - 12 20-54 �' O.R. --- 16 8. 9 /i SCALE: 1:500 ASP THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAII` GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST OEM STREET ' ONTARIO. CA 9R6 - TEL, 1909) 9101992 FAXs SOS DISTRICT 08 COIRITY RIVERSIDE 60 AREA 941-01391 PARCEL Noe 19509-4 =POST SQUARE FEET, 92T 20.48/32.76 tOURIE METERS' 86J PARCEL 1950900 0 0-4 8 PA�TTC��ACO'-ANY LEGAL DESCRr ION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement A-21 TE 60 --_ • 1: 500 -. r`. �,~rte ` "----7-_---_-__---,_= 1 f --' = _mil _ F' i -EXLST. R/W `h 0040 DMJMCC ram Rwiri TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 = SOU:NDWAL-.L 254 APN 481-312-014 ♦ 5C A -4.-e1 I 5T f Jf I'S 1 .A.... l n. v., ... " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Sheet 1 of 2 Being a portion of Lot 38 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09� 38' 16" East, 4.739 meters (15.55 feet) to a point on a non -tangent .curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 04� 59' 46" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 00� 57' 27" an arc length of _18.341 meters (60.17 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09� 38' 16" East, 4.740 meters (15.55 feet) from the southeasterly corner of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09� 38' 16" West, 4.740 meters (15.55 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly corner also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 05� 57' 31" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00 57' 42" an arc length of 18.341 meters (60.17 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.7 square meters (933 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.69-19510 (19510-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under my " 'recti. , in conformance with the Professional Land uryeyor's Act Signature Date 000050 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALW:ORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 6.0 SOUNDWALL 264 APN 481-312-013 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 37 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.740 meters (15.55 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 05° 57: 13" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 00° 57' 23" an arc length of 18.316 meters (60.09 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.742 meters (15.56 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.742 meters (15.56 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 06° 55' 09" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 5T 38" an arc length of 18.316 meters (60.09 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.7 square meters (933 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.70-19511 (19511-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described b me, or under my dir the Professional : , urveyo A Signature Date 000:053 SHEET 2 OF 2 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CAUFORNIA TE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTAKESCOu'SWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAII GROUND LEVEL oIST' Associated Engineers, lno. AREA 331 EAST SSW TREETFAX ONTArdO OR 9176' p ki,. flow I95 z1 TFL (901) 990.1992 (909) 9�LOt91 AllaL DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST. SOIINE FaT' 933 00 RIVERSIDE 60 20 48/32:76 IQIARE IETERSI 16.T4 PARCEL 195i1-1 000054 Exhibit "A" 000055 Temporary Construction Easement PA CE DR 1 r- Eltl ST 12LW fK, � --- f r��1• 1i ti • SOUND WA "�-- DM IVI aunt C: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60. SOUNDWALL 264 APN 481-312-Ct2 ... Dresent\ ce\254tce312012 (2l . eon 1 DATE PLOTTED .> 07/25/2002 1 rti nnnnn- 1 FA £f360 1 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 36 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.742 meters (15.56 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 06° 54' 36" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 00° 57' 20" an arc length of 18.302 meters (60.05 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, . North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.746 meters (15.57 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.746 meters (15.57 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 07° 52' 44". East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 5T 35" an. arc length of 18.302 meters (60.05 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.8 square meters (934 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the: grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights,. appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.72-19512 (19512-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been describ - • • y me, or under - • ction, in conformance with the Professional _,• Surve .'r's Signature Date avosmouloomessurdatesournatisussatioc 000056 SHEET 2 OF 2 1! N°i'sr44" TO STATE OF CALFurimA PER BK.1668/244 O.R. REC. t2 -2o -s4 1645. THE BEARINGS AM) DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 191I& ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAII GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. SCALE: 1: 500 16 Associated Engineers, 1ne AREA DISTRICT RIVERSIDE 60 ZO:IQYEZ T T SOL ARE FEET: 934 OS T6 'SQUARE SEERS, B64 EN EAST ST STREET ONTA11O• CA= NU6+• sPARC Nu 195121TEL,1909).�9001962 FAI41909: $4-069F COUNTY` ROUTE KI.OPOS PARCEL 1951 1 0. 0-5 7 PLAT TQQ A NY LI1GAL DES FON TEMPORARY . CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNOWALL 254 APN 48t-312-OY1 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 35 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.746 meters (15.57 feet) to a point .on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 07° 51' 56" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 00° 57' 18" an arc length of 18.293 meters (60.02 feet) to a point on theeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.751 meters (15.59 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.751 meters (15.59 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly corner also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 08° 50' 17" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 57' 33" an arc length of 18.293 meters (60.02 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.8 square meters (934 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.74-19513 (19513-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been descri • - d by me, or under .; d' - ction, in conformance with the Professional • Surve ,. is Signature Date iT ohn Imbiors LS. Tres 9/3 05 DIESCOPTIONRIM-U..c 00005g Y* THE BEARINGS COORAND DINATE SYANCES STEM OFN F11983 ZZOONE6 . MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0000635S TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA. W64 4 k TEL. (909) 900.1902 FAX, (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT oe COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 60 mLoPOST 20.49/31.76 PARCEL No4 19513-f SOUARE FEET, 934 MUNE INTERS. 86.8 PAR(EI. 1 u000-60 L�GALT�BSG PT ION A N. Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement PACE DR , r• t I : 500 SOUND WALL 254 DM(MC: mirw ter 00 d 6 1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION. EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 264 APN 481-312-01.0 nroconfltrnC'SSi1- c.11,11R1('Sl Ann 1OATF PIOTTFO -) (17,015, /NIA/ 1 riI nnnnn- Ira Arian Sheet 1 of 3 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 34 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 20, 1954, in Book 1668, Page 242 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.751 meters (15.59 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 08° 49' 15" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 00° 57' 19" an arc length of 18.296 meters (60.03 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.755 meters (15.60 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.755 meters (15.60 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 09° 43' 50" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 06' 10" an arc length of 3.008 meters (9.87 feet) to the beginning point of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1092.641 meters (3584.77 feet), said beginning point being on said first mentioned northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, a radial line through said point bears North 09° 38' 23" East; thence westerly along said southerly line, said first mentioned northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 48' 06" an arc length of 15.288 meters (50.16 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 87.0 square meters (936 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.76 -19514 (19514-1) See Sheet 3 of 3 for a plat depicting the above described Land. 00006.2_ SHEET 3 OF 3 • --1 9 PACE pR V DR 08 R40926411 48 M W'LYcoR X4.779 / - 0 ST LINE , GRANT DEEP 150.1618m PER CA�O 4,00• 06 .651 R 0. 4'242 0.R. � X467 7 X37 ium RI/ 9c3 sm R4676.297m fR) STATE ROUTE • OpRS1A1E GRANT O P� NatN'qY CFORt 9-8-1914°. t7P sEs 60 /65 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON TIE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331: EAST f1ELOY $TREVE ammo Qs $tT64 TEL. C909111110411112 FA& SOW 94(-OSSI AREA SCALE: 1:500 6E DISTRICT COUNTY OS RIVERSIDE 60' KLOPOST 20;48/32.T6 PARCEL: Noy 1954-1 SQUARE ter' 936 'SQUARE IEiERS§ 87.0 PARCEL 195'0 0 0 64 PLAT. TOA i : . , ®ANY LEGAL CSES • I • T ION _. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 6.0 - SOUN:DWALL 264 APN 481-312-009 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 33 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.755 meters (15.60 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1097.376 meters (3600.31 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 09° 46' 34" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 00° 41' 16" an arc length of 13.171 meters (43.21 feet) to the beginning point of Course "B"; thence easterly along said Course "B", South 79° 32' 11" East, 5.117 meters (16.79 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.700 meters (15.42 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.700 meters (15.42 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 10° 21' 20". East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 37' 30" an arc length of 18.287 meters (60.00 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.5 square meters (931 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and, distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.77-19515 (19515-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under my ectio s «.nformance with the Professional Surve , is Signature Date 000066 SHEET 2 OF 2 N%Y TO FORFRigiv STATE OF GRANT DEED OSEs /650 0 11116. Associated Engineers,. Inc. 33I EAST S►E3.BY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91T64 TEL. (909) 980.1962 FA/4 /909) 941.0$91 r* THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE gB�ASED ON THE CALFORNIA MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0000STEM 6355 TO 0 TI N' GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA DISTRICT O8 COUNTY RP/ERSDE 60 K1.OPOST 20.45/32.T6 PAID ffoi SQUARE FEET: 931 ',SQUARE METERS' 86:6; PARCEL 195V1 0 067 PLAT TO ACC O PANY, LEGAL DESCR I ' 1019 " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement r r e TEMPORARY)' I CONST: L EASEMEIff---7 1 1 73.2 m2 1. ^I (788 ft=) o.1 r" on; --PROP4--R��r r600" m \` t j DLVIJMCC] 1:500 GIo1a ter 000008 TEMPORARY CONSTR.I e.TI:ON EA MEN .. ROUTE 60 - SOU D WALL APN 481-3'x-0008 ..rncnr+\ +no, +no nn neYc PI (1TTFD .), n7/9 / AA M9 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 32 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.700 meters (15.42 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 79° 32' 11" East, 18.289 meters (60.00 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.765 meters (15.63 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 4.765 meters (15.63 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 10° 58' 51" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 37' 31" an arc length of 18.290 meters (60.01 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 86.2 square meters (928 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60- 25.79 -19516 (19516-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under action, in conformance with the Professional Surve Signature Date avainmovnaniumgesournansussursix 000069 R • Poe SWjy con ' 650 STATE RcUrE ?PLY UNE OF _DEED r0 Salt OF ..._CALIFuselA fist. No. 77063 0.12. SHEET 2 OF 2 Y* SCALE: 1:500 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1984 ZONE 6. DISTANCESMULTIPLY LEVEL STASHOWN NCES BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND Associated Engineers, Inca 339:EAST. SHELBY STREET (*TARI0. CA i1R64: TEL 19091 IeO.19e2 FA3C. MOS II4 01191 HMSTRICT oe COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE so kILOPOST 20:4C/3L76- - - AREA 5 ?ARCM, Mar SOUARE ter' PARCEL 1:951&1 U U 0-07 O PA Tgoti LEGAL0 000071 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement PACE DR TEMPORARY CONST. EASEMENT--- , 73.2rt' (788 ft')o r- /1 11 O" PROP. R/W t�► .� - I600 j� t r- 1 Z FnST •`-. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 6a - SOIINDIVALL 264 APN 481-512-007 1: 500 P/v-60 - .. \nresenf\1-cw\7C-4-fee-i1-7-6157-171. den 1DATE PLOTTED •> OT/25/2002 1 ru nnnnri ICA -ratan EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 31 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Sheet 1 of 2 BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the. State of Califomia, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 4.765 meters (15.63 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 79° 32' 11" East, 18.286 meters (59.99 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 09° 38' 16" East, 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 09° 38' 16" West, 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curveconcave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 11° 36' 21" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 37' 31" an arc length of 18.292 meters (60.01 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 89.2 square meters (960 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including ._access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property -,-in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV 60- 25.81 -19517 (19517-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under my •' ectio • , in conformance with the Professional : r,. urveyo Signature Date am = J mbio : r- S. 4430 Exp - 9/30/05 OISOLIFIIIONR1951,.i 000072 SHEET 2 OF 2 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE -CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL ` DISTANCES. 11 Associated Engineers Inc AREA ibill\:._, 33$ EAST gaff Vitt/ ONTARIO;CA ar64- TEL. N90919t FAXI(90911�-0891r ,P i mu I95IT"I 11XSmICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOS! SQUAREfEETt s6o os rovERsi x so YOAlu32a6 taws I1E R% 89.2 PARCEL 19501D 0 73 PVT TQ ACGQ LEGAL DESCRf 7' Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement 1-500 11+ • DMjMC: .I 1 000074 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 26'4 APN: 481-312-006 \r,re een+\ire\ 7-kd+1+e4I 7AAA 175 /4,-,, 1 nvic DI ATTCn - /AC /'�M9 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 30 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 09° 38' 16" East, 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 79° 32' 11" East, 1.454 meters (4.77 feet) to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 867.000 meters (2844.48 feet), said beginning point being the beginning of Course "B"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "B" through a central angle of 01° 05' 53" an arc length of 16.615 meters (54.51 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.328 meters (17.48 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 14° 38' 58" West, 5.328 meters (17.48 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 12° 12' 28" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 36' 07" an arc length of 17.612 meters (57.78 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 92.6 square meters (997 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.83-19518 (19518-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described b me, or under my di the Professional Lan • rveyor' Signature Date Expl : s 9/3 ► 05 in conformance with OHN /Mfho NO 4430 6:p. 09/30/05 000075 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Assodated Engineers, InO 330EAST SWAY STREET ONTARIO. CA SIM TELA011I80-1902 FAX.I90$ $41-01011 OISTRICT 00 RIVERSIDE KlAPOST 20.40/32.76 AREA No.r,.�_ SOUARE FEETi 997 *ME MOM 9Tr6: SHEET 2 OF 2 PARCEL 19518. 0 0-7 0 C95I83 r' TEMPORARY r-, j EASEMENT ' 73.0 m= E (786 ftt o 4 o on-) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 254 APN 481-312-005 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 29 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of Califomia, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.328 meters (17.48 feet) to a point on anon -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 867.000 meters (2844.48 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 11° 33' 42" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 01° 12' 31" an arc length of 18.288 meters (60.00 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.441 meters (17.85 feet) from the southeasterly corner of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 14° 38' 58" West, 5.441 meters (17.85 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly comer also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 12° 49' 58" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 37' 30" an arc length of 18.283 meters (59.98 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 98.7 square meters (1,062 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). Thebearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.84-19519 (19519-1) See Sheet 2 of 2for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has the Professional Signature Date een described •y me, or under urve OVOSNOV000‘00-013VEGAL DESCRIPTIONS119519-14oc tr - ction, in conformance with cy 000078 SHEET 2 OF 2 9 c, 1654.8 SWAY COR A o_jo. TE CI r0 tavF �_- it FOR of 1652. Rf� 9_89H0. r? AOJA SCALE: 1: 500 ' t \. 658. p re op RANT 'Ar tO THE BEARNGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON TIE MU,.TILY DISTAANCES SHOWN BYSYSTEM0006355 1903. O OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 338 EAST S)ELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9864 TEL (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KILOPOST 60 20.48/32.T6 PARCEL Nu • 195191 SQUARE FEET: 1,062 SQUARE METERS: 98.T PARCEL iyv8-67 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION " -T Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement " ;,,,SOUND WALL 254 o DMJM TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 254 APN 481-312-004 ..; \present\tce\254tce312004 (21. dgn IDATE PLOTTED =) 07/25/2002 CU 00000- IEA 463601 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 28 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly tine of said Lot, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.441 meters (17.85 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 867.000 meters (2844.48 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 12° 46' 13" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 01° 12' 33" an arc length of 18.298 meters (60.03 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.368 meters (17.61 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 14° 38' 58" West, 5.368 meters (17.61 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly corner also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 13° 27' 30" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 37' 32" an arc length of 18.299 meters (60.04 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 99.2 square meters (1,068 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.86-19520 (19520-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under: d' - . on, in conformance with the Professional Surve is Date OE NoJoo4aaouv.erx au952oi.aoc 000681 SHEET 2 OF 2 Lc - 58. • 1 656. 7 1 ^rtr OP GRANT DEED SW/ r TAT REC. 9_e -S910, 7107 OR Aw Y ��TATE --ST E 1 649, 5 AT E 7( 0 }#- 1-6-5&.4. SCALE: 1:500 8.2 1659. 5 1652. 6 3 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON M LTI LY DISTANCES OWN BTE Y 1.000063TEM OF 55 TZONE 6.N GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL 1909) 980-1982 FAXt (909) 941-0891 DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 60 KILOPOST AREA PARCEL No.t SQUARE FEET: 19520-1 1,068 SQUAREAETERSt 20.48/32.76 99.2 PARCEL 195 08 PLAT TO ACQOMPAN' LEGAL DESCRIPTION " 000083 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement SOUND WALL 254 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 254 APN 481-312-003 1:500 \present\tce\254tce312003(2).dgn (DATE PLOTTED =? 07/25/2002 I CU 00000 - TEA 463601 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 27 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Sheet 1 of 2 BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.368 meters (17.61 feet) to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 867.000 meters (2844.48 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 13° 58' 46" East, said point being the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said curve and said Course "A" through a central angle of 01° 07' 26" an arc length of 17.007 meters (55.80 feet) to the beginning of Course "B": thence southeasterly along said Course "B", South 74° 53' 48" East, 1.282 meters (4.21 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.109 meters (16.76 feet) from the southeasterly corner of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 14° 38' 58" West, 5.109 meters (16.76 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, said southeasterly corner also being a point on a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 14° 05' 01" East; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot, said northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 37' 31" an arc length of 18.291 meters (60.01 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 96.1 square meters (1,034 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-25.88-19521 (19521-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by a e, or under my dir= + . �. • ormance with the Professional Lana urveyors Act. Signature Date 000084 -A 1 1 r `OB o of PETf ielr coo TREwDf OaD e. 9NYS S YAP pA 1 -trakit, COURSE •3., -x- 1.65 . 0 l SHEET 2 OF 2 Y* SCALE: 1: 500 1655. T 3- k THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTFI..Y DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 11T64 TEL. 1909) 980-1982 FAX* 1909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 60 KLOPOST 20.48/32.76 PARCEL No.( SOUARE FEET( SQUARE AFTERS( 19521-1 1,034 96.1 PARCEL 1952){) 0 0 8 5 PLAT TO ACC® 'ANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION " i " o .. . , ) / / I/ ." " ,.. " " " ...... .,............. . 1 -,A,,, / / - '-r- Ts7 tt�� f1) // t' f _l/ I 1 1 r!'/ 1/ ��D 1 % / cN } ._.tip` ��i r ca ,- 1 t ! " // " " l 1- 2 la tt WJ Za5 1 O VZgle cc 0 ZI Oa c. t�� CC a a= Oa a 2cc W f Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 26 of Tract No. 10,004, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 106, Pages 20 through 23, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded September 8, 1959, as Instrument No. 77063 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 14° 38' 58" East, 5.109 meters (16.76 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 74° 53' 48" East, 26.490 meters (86.91 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 00° 24' 35" East, 4.933 meters (16.18 feet) from the southeasterlycorner of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 00° 24' 35" West, 4.933 meters (16.18 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line, North 75° 32' 32" West, 10.966 meters (35.98 feet) to the beginning point of a non -tangent curve concave southerly having a radius of 1676.297 meters (5499.65 feet), a radial line through said point bears North 14° 39' 20" East; thence continuing westerly along said southerly and northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 00° 34' 19" an arc length of 16.737 meters (54.91 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 133.6 square meters (1,438 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60- 25.90 -19522 (19522-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under my . irection, in conformance with the Professional Lan • : rveyor' Ac Signature Date ovoeNOtIOOOWOO13VPW&°E IVROM19R2-Loot 000087 SHEET 2 OF 2 ' I j !i 1 '1 M4 .05'0Pr 80 P Aft r - OQ CALIF R 9PER >> FREEWAYeED O URP COR )4q- 5 3 O.R. p PO ES _`\ -_,,_,, STA T I t= r, r) r Y* SCALE: 1:500 1 mootsc C II�N INC)629191. Soo. S 69 35'1 Tm / b.�sm 4 933m435"N 41.39'201E _ THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1963. ZONE 6. MULTII.Y DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9fT64 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 AREA ()STRICT COUNTY 08 RIVERSIDE ROUTE 60 RILOPOST 20.48/32.76 PARCEL No.i 19522-1 SOUARE FEET, X38 SQUARE METERS, 133.6 PAROEL 191)11)b b 88 PLAT TO'AECOMRANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement PACE DR I • SOl1ND-WAL,j 254 (9522 TEMPORARY CONST. EASEMENT\. 103. 1 m2 1� ltl I (1. 110 ft2) j I 25 • 047 m !, -82.2' , PROP. R/W EX1ST.(R/W 00009 • 1:500 DMjMIIH999ARRI Q E0.411, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 254. APN 481-312-001 \3426\present\tce\254tce312001.dgnIDATE PLOTTED -> 07/25/2002 1 CU 00000 IEA 463601 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement h-, • _ EXHIBIT "A" ELDER AVE ;(7— • -- _—. -- 7 1 x TEMP. CONS . EASEMENT I 45.7 m' 4 (492 ft:) 1I t x E fit. `r'-'� �v---2L4, m F— x(- 5.0')/ _ 7777- 7J7 BRUSH —_ — \-7 /�- / r _ j5--�• c__ ; L n 4 9 SODNO,WALL 270 X_ 1: 500 �� pia . nom_ _ / __—_ .. • }} ) yr _ t DMIMEIHARRIS Orm oota wax. Rd TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 270 APN 479-423-034 000090 . \1496\nrPSPnt\tcP\ ibtce47 4- don 'DATE PLOTTED -) 07/25/2002 1 cu 00000 IEA 463601 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement x 1 l {�r 0540 TEMP. CONST. x EASEMENT f 84.6 m2 it (911 ft2) FrA o 21.015 m (69.0') /1.4 -2602 m • 1: 500 POOL). ;''-, ♦ —� SOUND WALL 270 ROUTE 60 = f _ D1�ZJMCC oob09 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 270 A P N 479-423-037 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement ELDER 4' E 1 U :_ ---- i 1 1 1 7E, -s [2) m J2:1') 7777777/_ -22: t26-aL (72.6') I.4_:... - • - r• • 1: 500 DMJMNIFIARRIS gura warm. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SGUNDW'ALL 270 APN 479-423-039 1 DER A\1E EL V 27 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement POOLI 20.689 m (67.9') SOUND WALL ` 'J' 9 r 33. 5- s i� '040,03 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ` EASEMENT ROUTE 60! SOUECWALL 270: AD1J 1170-A9 -AAA EXHIBIT "A" Fee. Being a portion of Lot 29 of Tract No. 12902-5, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 142, Pages 65 through 72, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Sheet 1 of 2 BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 29, said corner being the southeasterly corner of Lot 10 of Tract 12902-4 on file in Book 141, Pages 24 through 26 inclusive of Maps, in said Office of the County Recorder, said corner also being on the northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 27, 1962, as Instrument No. 119152 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot 29 and the easterly line of said Lot 10, North 11° 05' 27" West, 3.784 meters (12.41 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", North 87° 17' 24" East, 19.942 meters (65.43 feet) to the beginning of Course "B"; thence northeasterly along said Course "B", North 64° 41' 38" East, 7.127 meters (23.38 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 12° 43' 23" West, 8.202 meters (26.91 feet) from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 29; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 12° 43' 23" East, 8.202 meters (26.91 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of California; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line, North 89° 22' 39" West, 27.444 meters (90.04 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 132.6 square meters (1,427 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course "B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60-27.57-19544 (19544-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under m dir= tion, in conformance with the Professional Lan `.r rveyo,, Ac Date 0000 4 PAXS-NOV0001,00413V +L DeSCRIPTIONS11951-1-1.doc Y SHEET 2 OF 2 SCALE: 1:500 7, TRACT ND 12902-4 NJ .8., l 24-2 1 738. 3 COURSE "A" BEGIN COURSE "A" NH • 05'27"W 3.784m 02.41') POB SW'LY COR LOT 29 SE'LY COR LOT 10 - (46.6 BEGIN COURSE "6" N87'17'24"E 19.942m (65.43') 1 732. 7 _ _— _ LOT 31 1748. 1 S12.43'23" 8.202m - (26.91') N'LY LINE OF PARCEL "B" DESCRIBED COURSE "8" W CC -D JW m Q LOT 321 -rte 1748.6 IN GRANT DEED TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES PER HST. NO. 119152 O.R.. REC. 12-27-62 STATE ROUTE 60 17-5 2 Associated Engineers, Inc. 330 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 AREA BRUSH -- THE BEARNGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KILOPOST 60 20.48/32.76 PARCEL Noe 19544-1 SQUARE FEETe 1,427 SQUARE METERS: 132.6 PARCEL 1954%1)095 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement • • ;� EX73 i . RAY-- 1:500 r c 7 2 2 ( i 1 _ { i o 1R 1 Si -1 000096 DMJMII 3141.1` . TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 274 APN 477-412-001. \nrAsrant\tr q\'f7 +rq4 T57N1 FT11 rinn I Herr of nrrrn -. IS, 17 .onn, Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 31 of Tract No. 12902-5, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 142, Pages 65 through 72, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 27, 1962, as Instrument No. 119152 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly along the westerly line of said Lot, North 12° 43' 23" West, 8.202 meters (26.91 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 89° 34' 21" East, 13.081 meters (42.92 feet) to a point on the southeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northeasterly thereon, North 33° 00' 10" East, 9.503 meters (31.18 feet) from the southeasterly comer of said Lot; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line, South 33° 00' 10" West, 9.503 meters (31.18 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line, North 89° 22' 39" West, 6.099 meters (20.01 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 76.7 square meters (826 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60- 27.59 —19545 (19545-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described • y me, or under my dire on, in conformance with the Professional La - urvey Signature Date 000097 o vrw sa.ax Y* SHEET 2 OF 2 • SCALE: 1: 500 \I 746. 6 POB SW'LY COR 1732.7 _ S33' 00'10"W 9.503m (31.18'). 6.099m 89 22'39"W BALTIMORE I/ i AVENUE vc U / STA 1748. b- '3 N'LY LINE OF PARCEL "6" DESCRIBED - - N GRANT DEED TO STATE OF CALFOINA O -------FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES PER INST. N0. 09152 — 1 7 3 3. 5 7-0.R.. REC.12-2T-62 . 1 735.2 `E ROUTE 60 ASPH BRUSH Assodated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 900-1982 FA/41909) 940891 AREA THE BEARNGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL. DISTANCES. DISTRICT OD COUNTY RIVERSIDE 6O KILOPOST 20.40/32.76 PARCEL No.i 19545-1 SWAM FEET, 826 SOUARE NETERSr T6.T PARCEL 1954u -"I °° 9 $ PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement • 1 ji J •,-_---�5 cam'" (11i C 16.544 m (54.3') 5_9 \ 733. 57 BALTIMORE AVE S�ilaQ'1YIC���74 /w-- D1 i ( _., t. t� 1. 1: 500 --. ASPH 000099 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 27.4 APN 477-412-003 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 32 of Tract No. 12902-5, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 142, Pages 65 through 72, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 27, 1962, as Instrument No. 119152 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 33° 00' 10" East, 9.503 meters (31.18 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 89° 34' 21" East, 6.901 meters (22.64 feet) to the beginning of Course "B"; thence easterly along said Course "B", South 87° 41' 15" East, 41.693 meters (136.79 feet) to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 26° 40' 24" West, 7.673 meters (25.17 feet) from the southeasterly corner of said Lot; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 26° 40' 24" East, 7.673 meters (25.17 feet) to said southeasterly corner, said southeasterly corner being on said northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of California; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line, North 89° 22' 39" West, 57.184 meters (187.61 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 397.7 square meters (4,281 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A" and said Course"B". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60- 27.62-19546 (19546-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described by me, or under m :'rection, in conformance with the Professional La . urveyor' A Date 000 t00 -- ON084+o‘m01AOCH uueca oESCuvnoNS119546-1.eoc Y* SHEET 2 OF 2 SCALE: 1: 500 '46. 6 POB g _SW'LY COR'O X7330 57 \ BALTIMORE 1 AVENUE 1 1735.2 STATE VC oz �< i LOT 33. 1748.6 1748. 8 —N'LY LINE OF PARCEL "B DESCRIBED —IN GRANT DEED TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA — FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES PER INST. NO.119152 — REC. 12-27-62 ROUTE 60A S P H l Associated Engineers, Inc. 33N EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 AREA THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 60 KILOPOST 20.48/32.76 PARCEL IIo., 19546-1 SQUARE FEET( 4.281 SOUARE METERS, 397.T PARCEL 1954610 10-1 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement i t• t : t i ' 1t I i` 1i\ �t y I�r • j3, 57 BALT1MQRE AVE' r_ I: 00 ASPS ROUE 60 A P 1 DMJMCC rum. or at 000102 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60' - SOU:ND.WALL 274 APN 477-412-004 Sheet 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 33 of Tract No. 12902-5, situated in the City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, State of California, on file in Book 142, Pages 65 through 72, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, for freeway purposes, recorded December 27, 1962, as Instrument No. 119152 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot, North 26° 40' 24" West, 7.673 meters (25.17 feet) to the beginning of Course "A"; thence easterly along said Course "A", South 87° 41' 15" East, 29.285 meters (96.08 feet) to a point on the easterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 00° 35' 02" East, 5.955 meters (19.54. feet) from the southeasterly corner of said Lot; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 00° 35' 02" West, 5.955 meters (19.54 feet) to said southeasterly comer, said southeasterly comer being on said northerly line of Parcel "B", described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot and said northerly line, North 89° 22' 39" West, 25.758 meters (84.51 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 175.0 square meters (1,884 square feet). This conveyance is made for the purpose of a freeway and the grantor hereby releases and relinquishes to the grantee any and all abutter's rights, including access rights, appurtenant to grantor's remaining property, in and to said freeway, over and across said Course "A". TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 60). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00006355 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-60- 27.66 -19547 (19547-1) See Sheet 2 of 2 for a plat depicting the above described Land. This real property has been described b me, or under my dir tion, in conformance with the Professional . ' . urveyo . Act. oESCxm 9s+7-Ldoc 000103 SHEET 2 OF 2 SCALE: 1:500 \ J \ BALTIMORE ,\ AVENUE T. 748. 6 35. _ i 1 748. 8 BEGIN COURSE "A" N26. 40'24"W T.673m (25J7' POB 1748.6 LOT 33 477-412-005 COURSE "A" SEW 4195"E 29.285m (96.08') I + 8J`22`3 ' 25.758m 084.51') STATE ROUTE 60 -- C N'LY LINE OF PARCEL "B" DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED TO STATE OF CALFORNIA FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES PER INST. N0.19152 0.R., REC. 12-27-62 I 1735 �ASPH 1 7 1;. 1.739. . THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORIBA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 100006355 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 960-1982 FAXi (9091941-0891 AREA DISTRICT Od COUNTY RIVERSIDE 60 K1.OPOST 20.48/32.76 PARCEL. No.t SOUARE Fait SQUARE METERS& I954T-I 4884 rT5.0 PARCEL 195400 Q 1. Q 4 PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCR I PTJ ON Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement P1 SOUND WALL 312 oti 000105 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 312 APN 477-631-005 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement I. .i y _ E -- MESA TOP TERRACE x L_J TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT (2, 426\ft=) _.i 55.410 m (181. 8') A / SOUND WALL 312 P I J • DMJMC:I RRJ ro 4imp Ft' TEMPORARY CONSTRUC1JJO;N EA=SEMENT ROUTE. 60 SOUN AL 312 APN 477-631-006 000106 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement MESA TOP TERRACE • 1 1 9552-) TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 123. I mz (1.325 ft=) 7850,7 0 i 1:500 1 -. 1 60 SPi i. H 1 ' 1 1 ; c. ROUTE 60 l� 000107 o 31_5_ DMJM TEMPORARY CONSTRUOTION BASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 312 APN 417-631-0.07 ■ r o . 1_xnibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement MESA TOP. TERRACE 1 1 I 1 J T MP. CONT11ST. [N 123.1 m2 (1.325 _) `X E^ x 0 • O • M Pv 30.785 m �----'— -- �- - - (10 .0') - - - - i ' 7 *"\ ! ' POOL; UJ 1:500 ASPN ASPH 6-3 o 1-785.66 SOUND WALL 312 0 c_ ROUTE. 60 0 315_ n DMIMC:onmR'JS TEMPORARY CONSTR.UO''ION. EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 312 APN 477-631-008 O001.� 0 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement F 1 MESA TOP TERRACE E^ 0 — o " 0 v " ---0 1\9555 TEMP. CONS T. EASEMENT _f 2 3. T \{nt (1.325 ffiz), 30. 785 rn (101.0') I ---ROUTE 160 SOUND WALL 312 DMJM:: 1: 500 Wit) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 312 APN 477-531-010 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement MESA- TOP TERRACE C L TEMP. CONT ! r EASEMENT 123.1 m2 x (1.325 ft=) E- o - o • 30.785 m mil(101.0') --� WALL 312 RO TE 60 C. _ A -, \l 7 , 1: 50 DMjMII kz [ Tart TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 SOUNDWALL 812 APN 477-631-012 oo 0110 ..\3026\present\tce\312tce531012.don I DATE PLOTTED -> 07/26/2002 1CU 00000 !EA 463601 Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement MESA TOP TERRACE l TEMP. CONST. EASEMENT 147.5 mZ (1,588 f -t) =..SOU D WALL 312 1: 50C • DMJMC� Op 011.1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 312 APN 477-631-013 . \3426\present\tce' 3f2tce53F013. dqn IDATE PLOTTED -> 07/26/2002 ICU 00000 (EA 46360t Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement MESA TOP TERRN.,c TEMP:�CONST. 7 . EASEMENT 164.5 m2 (1.771 f1) E o— x o - ;UM 4,. 40 422 m`�—`� - = =3- -- � -•--`1� - -- .z s-rs-rte-rte- (132.6') r — - --- ---__ ri 4-1-,1352-111._ SOUND WALL,/ �- ROLLTE-..6.0 1:50 DMMIIIHARRZ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 000112 ROUTE 60 - SOUNDWALL 3MENT 12 APN . 477-631-014 AGENDA ITEM 5B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 03-014, "Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, by Eminent Domain, that is Necessary for the Widening, Realignment and Improvement of State Route 74, Between Approximately 1640 Feet East of Wasson Canyon Road, in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Segment 2) " STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: • • 1) Conduct a public hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity, including providing all interested parties of the affected property, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Resolution of Necessity. 2) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in this report: i. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. ii. The project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. iii. The property to be acquired is necessary for the project. iv. The portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain. v. The offers of just compensation have been made to the property owners; and, 3) Adopt Resolution No. 03-014, "Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition of Fee and Easement Interests and Improvements Pertaining to the Realty in Certain Real Property Located in Riverside County, California, More Particular/y Described as APNS 342 -051 - Item 5B 000113 013, 342-051-007, 342-052-011, 342-052-016, 342-052-018, 342- 052-019, 342-061-007, 342-061-008, 342-062-001, 342-062-002, 342-062-007, 342-100-011, 342-100-012, 342-100-017, 342-100- 018, 342-100-022, 342-100-038, 342-100-048, 342-140-009, 342- 140-010, 342-140-011, 342-140-012, 342-160-001, 342-200-032, 342-210-032, 345-070-003, 345-080-046, 345-080-055, 345-080- 056, 345-090-003, 345-090-008, 345-200-007, 345-200-010, 345- 210-003, 345-220-005, 345-220-019, 345-220-022, 345-220-061, 345-220-066, 345-220-072, 349-342-006 and 349-342-007 (Project Parcel Nos. 13629-1, 13630-1, 13641-1, 13643-1, 13643-2, 13647- 1, 13649-1, 13650-1, 13653-1, 13654-1, 13661-1, 13663-1, 13684-1, 13714-1, 13714-2, 13718-1, 13724-1, 13730-1, 13732-1, 13752-1, 13752-2, 13752-3, 13780-1, 13798-1, 13798-2, 13802-1, 13803-1, 13803-2, 13804-1, 13805-1, 13806-1, 13813-1, 13825-1, 13827-1, 13832-1, 13832-2, 13835-1, 13836-1, 13837-1, 13852-1, 13854-1 and 13858-1), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Widening, Realignment and Improvement of State Route 74, Between Approximately 1640 Feet East of Wasson Canyon Road, in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Segment 2)." BACKGROUND: The State Route 74 Realignment project is a Measure "A" project from Dexter Avenue in the City of Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in the City of Perris. The project will be constructed in two segments. Segment 1 is from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to approximately 1640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road. Segment 2 is from approximately 1640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road to 7t'' Street in Perris. The County of Riverside Real Property Department is acting as right-of-way acquisition agent for the Commission in the acquisition of the parcels. Offers of just compensation to purchase the parcels described in RON 03-014 were prepared and initially presented to the property owners of record by letters on or before September 27, 2002. The offers have not been accepted to date, however negotiations are ongoing and will continue. The negotiations are not precluded by the holding of the hearing or the Commission's approval of a resolution of necessity. It may be necessary to acquire some or all of the parcels described in Exhibit "A" by eminent domain. The initiation of the eminent domain process is the approval of a resolution of necessity. Prior to approving a resolution of necessity (RON), the Commission must give each person whose property is to be acquired, and whose name and address appears on • Item 5B 000114 " " " the last equalized County Tax Assessor's roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on: 1. Whether the public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. Whether the proposed project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; 3. Whether the acquisition of the real property is necessary for the project; 4. Whether portions of the real property to be acquired, as identified below, are "remnants" as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410, thereby giving the Commission separate statutory authority to acquire those portions by eminent domain; and 5. Whether the required offers to acquire the real property have been made. Note: The fair market value of the property is not an issue at the hearing. The notice must be mailed by first class mail and state the intent of the Commission to consider the approval of the resolution, the right of each person to appear and be heard on these issues, and that the failure to file a written request to appear will result in a waiver of the right to appear and be heard. The Commission must then hold a hearing at which all, persons who filed a written request within 15 days of the date the notice was mailed may appear and be heard. The required notice was mailed to the propertyowners, identified in Exhibit "A" of RON 03-014, on October 28, 2002. DISCUSSION: The following addresses the findings that are required for approval of the resolution of necessity: (1) THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE PROPOSED PROJECT Item 5B State Route 74 between Lake Elsinore and Perris is an older highway, which does not meet current design standards. Many of the horizontal and vertical curves along this route do not meet passing and stopping sight distance standards. Safe passing distances through this 8.5 -mile section are limited to 9 locations, constituting approximately one-half of the length. Left turns o o i.Ir 5 to private driveways and cross streets causes queuing of traffic in one direction until opposing traffic has passed. Shoulders are substandard and mostly unpaved, varying in width from 2 feet to 10 feet. The angle of intersection of the majority of the cross streets does not meet Caltrans or County standards. With increased traffic volumes over the past several years, safety has become a primary concern along this section of State Route 74. According to Caltrans records, over the last ten years there have been 39 fatalities and 716 injuries. A significant amount of public support for this project has been evident at RCTC Commission meetings and has resulted in the acceleration of the implementation of the Route 74 widening project from 1-15 in Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in Perris. As a result of this public input, at the September 8, 1999 Commission meeting, the Commission established an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of Commissioners Gene Bourbonnais, Al Landers, Tom Mullen, and Kevin Pape to expedite improvement to Route 74. The Committee met on September 17, 1999 and reviewed project status for both the Measure "A" State Route 74 improvement project and the various Caltrans SHOPP (State Highway Operations and Protection Program) projects. The meeting was also attended by members of the public that are interested in accelerating improvements to this segment of State Route 74. After consideration of the information presented, the Committee members were unanimous in their desire to recommend to the Commission that it assist Caltrans with delivering the remainder of the Caltrans SHOPP projects combined with the Measure "A" improvement project within the limits of 1-15 and 7th Street on State Route 74 with the intent of accelerating the construction of all improvements. At the October 13, 1999 RCTC meeting, the State Route 74 project was accelerated via approval of Agenda Item No. 9. (2) THE PROJECT IS PLANNED OR LOCATED IN A MANNER THAT WILL BE MOST COMPATIBLE WITH THE GREATEST PUBLIC GOOD AND THE LEAST PRIVATE INJURY The roadway realignment follows the existing alignment as much as practical. New realignment was necessary to meet current design standards. The project has been designed in such a manner as to create the optimum benefit to the existing community while requiring the least amount of property take. Item 5B • 000116 " " " (3) THE ACQUISITION OF THE PARCELS ARE NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT The acquisition of parcels identified in RON 03-014 is required in order to provide the wider road and to conform to current horizontal and vertical design standards. Consideration was also provided to limiting the impact on adjacent properties. (4) PORTIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY MAY BE ACQUIRED BY EMINENT DOMAIN AS REMNANTS Item 5B The list of parcels that include uneconomic remnants is attached as Page 1 of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-014. The legal descriptions of the real property that the Commission is seeking to acquire are attached to the proposed Resolution of Necessity as Exhibit "A". For the parcels identified in Exhibit "B" of RON 03-014, a substantial portion of the property is being acquired because it is necessary for the widening and re -alignment of Highway 74. The remainders of those parcels are being acquired on the grounds that they are remnant parcels. Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410 authorizes a public agency to acquire a remnant parcel, even though it is not necessary for the proposed project, and subsection (a) of Section 1240.410 defines a "remnant" as a "remainder or portion thereof that will be left in such size, shape, or condition as to be of little market value." At the time the parcels described in the proposed Resolution of Necessity were appraised by the Commission's appraiser, Robert S. Perdue, Mr. Perdue concluded that those remainder parcels were remnants, as defined in Section 1240.410. In order to distinguish what property the Commission is acquiring based on public use and necessity and what portion is an uneconomic remnant, two metes and bounds descriptions are provided. Page 1 of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-014 identifies the parcels that include uneconomic remnants. The rest of Exhibit "B" to RON 03-014 provides the legal descriptions of the portions of those parcels identified on page 1 of Exhibit "B" that the Commission is acquiring for public use and necessity and the widening and re -alignment of State Route 74 (the project). Exhibit "A" to RON 03-014 provides the complete description of all of the parcels to be acquired, including the uneconomic remnants. Commission staff has not obtained a separate metes and bounds legal description of the uneconomic remnants. The remnants would constitute those portions of the parcels identified on page 1 of Exhibit "B" that are not described in the legal descriptions that follow in Exhibit "B". 0: (5) THE OFFERS OF JUST COMPENSATION HAVE BEEN MADE Appraisals were prepared by Robert Shea Perdue & Associates and American Appraisal Associates to establish the fair market value of the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty that RCTC is seeking to acquire. The Commission reviewed the results of the original appraisals at the October 29, 2001, January 28, 2002, May 8, 2002, and July 10, 2002 Commission meetings. The Commission directed staff to transmit the approved offers of just compensation to the property owners. Offers of just compensation were made to the property owners to purchase the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty as established by the approved appraisals and as required by Section 7267.2 of the California Government Code. Although negotiated settlements may still be possible for the property cited above, it would be appropriate to commence the procedures to acquire the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty through eminent domain to ensure that access and the necessary property rights will be available to meet the critical time frames associated with the development of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no new fiscal impact from this action. The Commission approved the current budget for the subject State Route 74 widening project at the May 8, 2002 Commission meeting. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Commission: (1) Received a Negative Declaration/Finding of No Significance (ND/FONSI), which was approved by Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on July 25, 1994; and, (2) Prepared an Environmental Re-evaluation, because of the passage of time, which determined that a Supplemental ND/FONSI was not required and was approved by Caltrans and FHWA on October 20, 2000 and updated in June 2002, to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The notice of this public hearing was mailed on October 28, 2002 (15 days prior to meeting) to each property owner of record. Attachments: 1. Table 1 "State Route 74 Condemnation Parcels" November 13, 2002 2. Project Map 3. Resolution of Necessity No. 03-014 Item 5B • • 0001:18 Table 1 State Route 74 Condemnation Parcels • • • D November 13, 2002 CPN Ax's Activity Grantor 13629-1 349-342-007 FEE Martha Louise Phillips, Trustee 13630-1 349-342-006 FEE Martha Louise Phillips, Trustee 13641-1 345-220-061 FEE Shapleigh Kimes, et ux. 13643-1 345-220-072 FEE Ronald Statum, et. ux. 13643-2 345-220-072 TCE Ronald Statum, et. ux. 13647-1 345-220-066 FEE Steve Haney, et. ux 13649-1 345-220-022 FEE Carl Campbell 13650-1 345-220-019 FEE Flying Bald Eagle Corp. 13653-1 345-210-003 FEE Newton Kimes 13654-1 345-220-005 FEE Raymond Rasmussen, et ux. 13661-1 345-200-010 FEE Jang Bu Park, et. al. 13663-1 345-200-007 FEE Willie Givens, et. ux. 13684-1 345-070-003 FEE Nguu. Viet Dinh, et ux. 13714-1 345-090=008 FEE Salvador Madrigal, et. ux. 13714-2 345=090-008 TCE Salvador Madrigal, et. ux. 13718-1 345-090-003 FEE Thomas A. Johnson, et. al 13724-1 345-080-046 FEE Luis Briseno, et. al 13730-1 345-080-056 FEE Ching L. Hsu, et. al. 13732-1 345-080-055 FEE Ching Lung Hsu 13752-1 342-210-032 FEE Essie Polk 13752-2 342-210-032 TCE Essie Polk 13752-3 342-210-032 TCE Essie Polk 13780-1 342-200-032 FEE Louis J. Mercado 13798-1 342-140-009 FEE Jeremiah Strange 13798-2 342-140-009 FEE Jeremiah Strange 13802-1 342-140-010 342-140-011 342-140-012 FEE Marian Ellen Frederick 13803-1 342-100-038 FEE Violet M. Graves, et. al 13803-2 342-100-038 TCE Violet M. Graves, et. al 13804-1 342-100-011 342=100-012 342-100-017 342-100-018 FEE Vincent Graves 13805-1 342-160-001 FEE Goodhope Missionary Baptist Church 13806-1 342-100-048 FEE Goodhope Missionary Baptist Church 000119 CPN APN's Activity Grantor 13813-1 342-100-022 13825-1 342-052-011 13827-1 342-051-007 13832-1 342-052-016 13832-2 342-052-016 13835-1 342-051-013 13836-1 342-052-018 13837-1 342-052-019 13852-1 342-061-007 342-061-008 13854-1 342-062-001 342-062-002 13858-1 342-062-007 FEE Vincent R. Graves FEE Charles Thierry FEE Dorothy H. Sexton FEE Larry Payne, et. al. TCE Larry Payne, et. al. FEE Larry T. Payne Full FEE Patrick Lavey, et. ux. Full FEE Donald R. Johnson Sr., et. al. FEE Marian E. Frederick FEE William Ewert, et. ux. FEE Lizzie Mae Taylor 000 20 x R S 1 11 INDEX OF SHEETS RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY (NOVEMBER 13, 2002) STATE OF CALIF ORNIA DEPAR TMENT OF TRANSP OR TATION PROJECT PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION ON STATE HIGHWAY IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY NEAR PERRIS FRO M 0.5 KM EAST OF WASSON CANYON ROAD TO 7TH STREET To 0e supplemented by St anda rd Pion s doted July, 1999 74 eA SR 74 PARCELS - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY NO CPN APN GRANTOR 1 13629-1 349-342-007 MARTHA LOUISE PHILLIPS -TRUSTEE 2 13630-1 349.342-006 M ARTHA LOUISE PHILLIPS -TRUSTEE 3 1364I -I 345-220-061 SHAPLEICH KIMES,e t.u x. 4 13643.1.2 345-220-012 RONALD STATW, et. U x. 5 13647-1 345-220-066 STEVE HANEY,et.u x. 6 13649-1 345-220-022 CARL CAMPBELL 7 13650.1 345.220-019 FLYING BALD EAGLE CORP. 8 13653-1 345-210-003 NEWTON KIMES 9 13654-1 345.220-005 RAYMOND RASMJSSEN•et.u x. 10 13661-1 345.200-010 JANG BU PARK,e t.o1 11 13663-1 345-200-007 WILLIE GIVENS,et,ux. 12 13664-1 345-070-003 NGUU VIET DINH. et. ux. 13 13714-1.2 345-090-008 SALVADOR MALORIGAL, et.ux. 14 13716-1. 345.090-003 THCmA5 A. JOHNSON,e t.o1. 15 13724-1 345.080-046 LUIS BRISENO.et.d1. 16 13730-1 345-080-056 CHING LUNG HSU 17 13732-1 345-080-055 CHING LUNG HSU 18 13752-1.2.3 342-210-032 ESSIE POLK The Contractor shall possess the Cio ss tor closest) of 11Cenu os spectfte0 10 the "•Notice to Con tr ootor s". veg. 1P6. 1i •1M ORR •1V N1 SR 74 PARCELS - RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY NO CPN APN GRANTOR 19 13780-I 342-200-032 LOUIS J. MERCADO 20 13798-1,2 342-140-009 JEREMIAH/ROBERT i VIOLA STRANGE 21 13802-1 342-140.010.011,012 FREDERICK MARIAN ELLEN 22 13803-1,2 - 342-100-038 VIOLET M. GRAVES.et.ol. 23 13804-1 342-100-011,012,017,018 VINCENT R. GRAVES 24 13805-1 342-160.001 0000HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH 25 13806.1 342-100-048 G000HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH 26 13813-1 342-100-022 VINCENT R. GRAVES 27 13825.1 342-052-011 IRENE MARTIN 28 13827-1 342-051-007 DOROTHY N. SEXTON 29 13832.1,2 342-052-016 LARRY T. PAYNE 30 13835-1 342-051-013 LARRY T. PAYNE 31 13836-1 342-052-018 PATRICK LAVEY.et.ux. 32 13837.1 342-052-019 DONALD R. JOHNSON SR,et,ol. 33 13852-1 342-061-007,008 M ARIAN E. FREDRICK 34 13854.1 342.062-001.002 W ILLIAM EVERT ET.uX 35 13858.1 342-062.001 LIZZIEMAE TAYLOR roe * souti0 PLAN14 OR:01nm. 0 9) 6 /0 6 1CALx 11 10 MILL11tT1Re 1 . 1 , t . 1 , ( DIVT 08 COUNTY RIV ROVTL 74 Mr. MATT KP 32.5/41.4 T6 &NOW M 1x1111 001. r 1t) 1//100 r 6Pw 11011 1 e• 6 ne ONW ter .. Munn r 661. .•.6 M .161,1011 6.161 •t)1 M., 0.11, 7 0001.21 PION Am.6 0I 001. Y TRANSPORTATION TCOMMIS ION 4080 LEMON ST, 3RD FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 SC ENGINEERING 143111 CALIF O IIa Avt SUITE 104 VICTCRVIL.E.CA 9239! Contract N o. USERSIAME •) SC ENGINEERING CGe FILE •) .PLv74NI.1•1 Mn-pn-2%4_.l Nl,l l -O2 . ,rCU 06224 1 \rw exh-, 2\condemexh_11_02Ago Nov, 04, 2002 13:49:35 EA 464111 RESOLUTION NO. 03-014 • "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DECLARING THAT THE ACQUISITION OF FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS AND IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE REALTY IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY L OCA TED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS APNS 342-051-013, 342-051-007, 342-052-011, 342-052-016, 342-052- 018, 342-052-019, 342-061-007, 342-061-008, 342-062-001, 342- 062-002,342-062-007, 342-100-011, 342-100-012, 342-100-017, 342-100-018, 342-100-022, 342-100-038, 342-100-048, 342-140- 009, 342-140-010, 342-140-011, 342-140-012, 342-160-001, 342- 200-032, 342-210-032, 345-070-003, 345-080-046, 345-080-055, 345-080-056, 345-090-003, 345-090-008, 345-200-007, 345-200- 010, 345-210-003, 345-220-005, 345-220-019, 345-220-022, 345- 220-061, 345-220-066, 345-220-072, 349-342-006 AND 349-342- 007 (PROJECT PARCEL NOS. 13629-1, 13630-1, 13641-1, 13643-1, 13643-2, 13647-1, 13649-1, 13650-1, 13653-1, 13654-1, 13661-1, 13663-1, 13684-1, 13714-1, 13714-2, 13718-1, 13724-1, 13730-1, 13732-1, 13752-1, 13752-2, 13752-3, 13780-1, 13798-1, 13798-2, 13802-1, 13803-1, 13803-2, 13804-1, 13805-1, 13806-1, 13813-1, 13825-1, 13827-1, 13832-1, 13832-2, 13835-1, 13836-1, 13837-1, 13852-1, 13854-1 AND 13858-1), BY EMINENT DOMAIN IS NECESSARY FOR THE WIDENING, REALIGNMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 74 BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 1640 FEET EAST OF WASSON CANYON ROAD, IN LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA, TO 7TH STREET, IN PERRIS, CALIFORNIA (SEGMENT 2)" WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") proposes to acquire fee easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty in certain real property, located in Lake Elsinore and Perris, California, more particularly described. as Assessor Parcel Nos. 342-051-013, 342- 051-007, 342-052-011, 342-052-016, 342-052-018, 342-052-019, 342-061- 007, 342-061-008, 342-062-001, 342-062-002, 342-062-007, 342-100-011, 342-100-012, 342-100-017, 342-100-018, 342-100-022, 342-100-038, 342- 100-048, 342-140-009, 342-140-010, 342-140-011, 342-140-012, 342-160- 001, 342-200-032, 342-210-032, 345-070-003, 345-080-046, 345-080-055, 345-080-056, 345-090-003, 345-090-008, 345-200-007, 345-200-010, 345- 210-003, 345-220-005, 345-220-019, 345-220-022, 345-220-061, 345-220- 066, 345-220-072, 349-342-006 AND 349-342-007 (Project Parcel Nos. 13629- 1, 13630-1, 13641-1, 13643-1, 13643-2, 13647-1, 13649-1, 13650-1, 13653- 1, 13654-1, 13661-1, 13663-1, 13684-1, 13714-1, 13714-2, 13718-1, 13724- 1, 13730-1, 13732-1, 13752-1, 13752-2, 13752-3, 13780-1, 13798-1, 13798 - Item 5B 0'0)01.22 2, 13802-1, 13803-1, 13803-2, 13804-1, 13805-1, 13806-1, 13813-1, 13825- 1, 13827-1, 13832-1, 13832-2, 13835-1, 13836-1, 13837-1, 13852-1, 13854-1 & 13858-1), for purposes of the widening, realignment and improvement of State Route 74, between approximately 1640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road, in Lake Elsinore, California, to 7th Street, in Perris, California (Segment 2), pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, the Commission scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 9:00 a.m., at the Chancellor's Conference Room, University Village, 1201 University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, California, and gave to each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appeared on the last equalized county assessment roll, notice and a reasonable opportunity to appear at said hearing and be heard on the matters referred to in section 1240.030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and WHEREAS, said hearing has been held by the Commission and each person whose property is to be acquired by eminent domain was afforded an opportunity to be heard on said matters; and WHEREAS, the Commission is specifically authorized, by section 1240.410 of the California code of Civil Procedure, to acquire remnant parcels by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, the Commission may now approve a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to section 1240.040 of the California Code of Civil Procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMISSION DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AND DECLARE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. There has been compliance by the Commission with the requirements of section 1245.235 of the California Code of Civil Procedure regarding notice and hearing. Section 2. Public Use. The public use for which the fee and easement interests and improvements pertaining to the realty are to be acquired is for the widening, realignment and improvement of State Route 74, between Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in Perris (Segments 1 and 2), pursuant to the authority granted to it by section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code. Section 130220.5 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes the Commission to acquire by eminent domain property necessary for such purposes. • • Item 5B 00°0123 " Section 3. Description of Property. Attached and marked as Exhibit "A" are the legal descriptions, plats and description of the real property and improvements to be acquired by the Commission, which describe the general location and extent of the property with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. Section 4. Findings. The Commission hereby finds and determines each of the following: (a) The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; (b) The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; (c) Portions of the property described in Exhibit "A" are necessary for the proposed project, and those portions are described in Exhibit 111311; (d) The remainders of the parcels described in Exhibit "A," after separating out those portions described in Exhibit "B," are remnant parcels as defined in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.410; and (e) Pursuant to section 1245.230(4) of the California Code of Civil Procedure, either the offers required by section 7267.2 of the California Government Code have been made to the owners or owners of record, or the offers have not been made because the owners cannot be located with reasonable diligence. Section 5. Use Not Unreasonably Interfering with Existing Public Use(s). Some or all of the real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. The legal descriptions of these easements and rights -of -way are on file with the Commission and describe the general location and extent of the easements and rights -of -way with sufficient detail for reasonable identification. In the event the herein described use or uses will not unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property subject to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.510 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Item 5B 0001,24 Section 6. More Necessary Public Use. Some or all of the real property to be acquired is subject to easements and rights -of -way appropriated to existing public uses. To the extent that the herein described use or uses will unreasonably interfere with or impair the continuance of the public use as it now exists or may reasonably be expected to exist in the future, the Commission finds and determines that the herein described use or uses are more necessary than said existing public use. Counsel for the Commission is authorized to acquire the herein described real property appropriated to such existing public use(s) pursuant to section 1240.610 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Staff is further authorized to make such improvements to the real property being acquired that it determines are reasonably necessary to mitigate any adverse impact upon the existing public use. Section 7. Further Activities. Counsel for the Commission is hereby authorized to acquire the hereinabove described real property and improvements in the name of and on behalf of the Commission by eminent domain, and counsel is authorized to institute and prosecute such legal proceedings as may be required in connection therewith. Legal counsel is further authorized to take such steps as may be authorized and required by law, and to make such security deposits as may be required by order of court, to permit the Commission to take possession of and use said real property and improvements at the earliest possible time. Counsel is further authorized to correct any errors or to make or agree to non -material changes in the legal description of the real property and improvements that are deemed necessary for the conduct of the condemnation action or other proceedings or transaction required to acquire the subject real property and improvements. Counsel is further authorized to reduce or modify the extent of the interests or property to be acquired so as to reduce the compensation payable in the action where such change would not substantially impair the construction and operation of the project for which the real property and improvements are being acquired. Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of November, 2002. John F. Tavaglione, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • • Item 5E3 '00`0125 " " Definitions of Legal Rights to be Acquired "Fee," also known as fee simple or fee simple absolute, refers to complete or absolute ownership of the property. "Temporary construction easement," refers to the right of plaintiff, its successors and assigns, to engage in construction and related activities for the project as referred to in the complaint, together with all necessary rights of ingress and egress to the easement area in connection with. the exercise of any of the easement rights. Prior to termination of this easement, property owners shall not erect or construct, or permit to be erected or constructed, any building, structure or improvement on, over or under any portion of the easement, nor shall property owners plant any tree or trees or plant any other vegetation or flora on any portion of the easement except at the written consent of plaintiff. Plaintiff shall be entitled to trim, cut, or clear away any trees, brush, or other vegetation or flora from time to time as plaintiff determines in its sole discretion without payment of any additional compensation to property owners. No other easement or easements shall be granted on, under, or over this easement without obtaining the prior written consent of plaintiff. The duration of the rights under this easement shall not be for less than twenty four (24) months from the commencement of construction on the applicable parcel and not more than thirty (30) months of the date possession of the applicable parcel as authorized by court order. 0001.26 RVL1TKAR\611138 EXHIBIT .A PAGE_L,.. Exhibit. "A" Fee Uneconomic Remnant THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF - CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF LOT 7 OF PROGRESSIVE SUBDIVISION, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 16 PAGE 56 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 51 OF SAID TRACT, EXTENDED WESTERLY TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE COUNTY HIGHWAY. (349-342-006) PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF LOT 8 OF PROGRESSIVE SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 16 PAGE 56 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 51 OF SAID TRACT EXTENDED WEST TO HIGHWAY 74. (349-342-007) CTPN: 13629-1 & 13630-1 000127 EXHIBIT A PAGES--_ 349-// 349-34 aK, OLD ode F 000wt. - T.R.A. 65/8 n h POR. NW 1/4 SEC. 22, r5 R.4W. Lof f I I. 1310 i 000 /140 o ♦ ` de r O14 \ , h w �{� 4 '.0d \ �* k Oti i • .4 M b 1 I I h N n r 1 l I I ` I 4 ‘; b e, et IMF I i I p. \ .1.! ' Co 0.1 ®e ae.� . I O t , I -----.1-;---- .''' .. 0 ' /Am P. ! 114,01 o W O ff.) a n a i) e ! _ h s ae = h 0/7.4.1 C h. /6/5 6 P ROGRE SS /VE S UBD /V/S/ON roli.uer /OW/ n' e*te'f • D174. e/Yta tone rn♦ refs, 0 V 4.1 4 SSESSQ4S MAP 8R,349 PG.34 RIVERSIDE COUNT CALM: • C) 0 co 2 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 2 as shown on Parcel Map No. 14958, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 79, Page 51 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 2, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters], as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 2, North 89° 29' 49" West, 8.515 meters; thence North 13° 25' 35" East, 10.260 meters; thence North 22° 17' 39" East, 24.657 meters to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 2, said point being distant westerly thereon, North 89° 29' 17" West, 9.142 meters from the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 2; thence easterly along said northerly line, South 89° 29' 17" East, 9.142 meters to said northeasterly corner of Parcel 2, said corner being on said northwesterly line of said State Highway 74; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2, South 20° 39' 38" West, 35.041 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 309.9 square meters (3336 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.1-13641 (13641-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional L d Surveyors Signature Date: of O , L. 4 30 ES 9/30/01 M:14➢1761MAPPINGACCW5U364 ANDC lYNIRIT A PAGE 4 000129 SHEET 1 OF 1 Y* • SCALES 111000 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 PM 14958 PMB 79/51 PARCEL 3 000130 Associated Engineers, inc. WLYLME • Pa— tie l� SC's Pti. t43'25'35'E 10.260m PARCEL 4 (NE' LY C0R PIO 0 - THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ilio ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0 5 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL 13641-1 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 c DISTRICT • 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KLOPOST 74 33.9/34.2 PARCEL Has I364H SOUARE FEET SQUARE LEHRSr SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY 3336 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 309.VX1-11RIT t PQ(;F EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map No. 14958, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 79, Page 51 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters], as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 1, North 89° 29' 17" West, 9.142 meters; thence North 20° 35' 35" East, 56.772 meters to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 1, said northerly line being the southerly line of Parcel Map 6013, filed in Book 14, Page 72 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 89° 27' 11" West, 9.211 meters from the northeasterly corner of said Parcel 1; thence easterly along said northerly line, South 89° 27' 11" East, 9.211 meters to said northeasterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being on said northwesterly line of said State Highway 74; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Parcel 1, South 20° 39' 38" West, 56.790 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING: - Containing approximately 489.3 square meters (5267 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.1-13643 (13643-1) This real property description has been prepared b me, or under my direction, in conformance with th - rofessional Lan• u ors Date: M_%99136VMAP61NGV°EEDS1136133)OC 000131 CHIBIT1,.L PAGE__�O.__. *Y RS 6-7/90 J V N N'tY LINE OF PCL 1 000132 r ARCr i 1 PARCEL MAP 6013 PMS 1'j/I2 RS c)1170 SLY LINE OF PM 6013.1143 14/72 PARCEL 1 PM 1 495 FMS -19/51 STY LINE OF PCL t PARCEL 2 AREA Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982.. FAX: 009) 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.: 13643-1 SQUARE FEET: 5267 SQUARE METERS: 489.3 POB SE'LY COR OF PCL I /S0 / / / / / / NE'LY COR OF PCL 1 / • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF (983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13643-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A PAGE/ " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map No. 14958, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State .of California, filed in Book 79, Page 51 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeasterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters], as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Parcel 1, North 89� 29' 17" West, 9.142 meters; thence North 20� 35' 35" East, 42.321 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 20� 35' 35" East, 14.451 meters to a point on the northerly line of said Parcel 1, said northerly line being the southerly line of Parcel Map 6013, filed in Book 14, Page 72 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along said northerly line and said last mentioned southerly line, North 89� 27' 11" West, 19.161 meters; thence South 20� 35' 35" West, 7.883 meters; thence South 69� 24' 25" East, 18.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 201.0 square meters (2,164 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.1-13643 (13643-2) This real property description has been prepare y conformance with the Professional t,fnd Sy}r9eyor ct Date: or under my direction, in 000133 M:W91 }iooC EXHIBIT A PAGE * Y 0 W J vl RS J7/9J PARGE.L. 1 PM .6013 Pj\lifl 14/-12 S'IY LINE OF PM 6013. PMB 14/72 7.--- N89.27,rw 19.16Im N'LY LINE OF PCL I 000134 kh,,,, 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX: (9091941-0891 S20' 35'35"W 7.883m PARCEL 1 PM 14952 PMS 79/51 S'LY LINE OF PCL I • FARCE -It Associated Engineers, Inc. S TPOB NE'LY COR OFPCL 1 AP h- AQ in P ,...14. h N. 5 to q / / Q'X 0 • / n Cw 740 / 0 . 1 / ti nE / le; • 0 Ar /sz4 00, /5.240„, /So.) POC SE'LY COR OF PCL I / • ,t ',7 ,.... ,../.) Cu THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.000103 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No. 13643-2 SQUARE FEET: 2164 SQUARE METERS: 20.0 PARCEL 13643-2 C V r SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY E LEE_XHIB DESCRIPTION ..A. _ PAGES. E " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map No. 17381, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 105, Page 30 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 1, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map, thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line of State Highway 74 and the northwesterly line of said Parcel 1, North 20� 39' 38" East, 84.953 meters; thence continuing along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, North 64� 06' 35" East, 9.642 meters to a point of intersection with the southwesterly line of River Road (74.00 feet wide) [22.555 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line of River Road and the northeasterly line of said Parcel 1, South 72� 26' 29" East, 26.366 meters; thence North 88� 11' 06" West, 20.476 meters; thence South 30� 45' 06" West, 19.943 meters; thence South 23� 33' 48" West, 66.850 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 72� 29' 02" East, 6.711 meters; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 72� 29' 02" West, 6.711 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 896.4 square meters (9,649 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV 74-34.2-13647 (13647-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with tt Professional Land Surv-yors . 4.: ��HN / S 5 so Me; Signature: Date: m " iorski, L. . 4430 Expire /30/01 �� e NO. 4430 Exp. 09/30/01 EXHIBIT: PAGE). 000135 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE: 111000 046 36 16k Associated Engineers, Inc. i 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KA_OPOST .kiln", tar 29'02"W 6.Tam PARCEL 1 AREA �Mp x/sr Riw )488.11'06°W LIVE pet e 20.476m 0 O/ PARCEL 1 PM 17381 ?MB 105/30 PM 9467 PMB 40/3.4 PARCEL. Boa 6641-1 SQUARE FEET: 9649 SOIIARF METERS: 896.4 w PARCEL 2. PARCRL THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM TOZO ONE BTAIN GROUNDG. MULTIPLY DLEVEL DISISTANCESN�.BYire = PARCEL 13647-1 �SlK,EETGCpH TOU� ACCOMPANYp,�p��p CJ�tIItS� �lSc_YAlit _t1 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of Parcel 2 as shown on Parcel Map No. 6013, filed in Book 14 Page 72 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (50.00 feet half width) [15.240 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Parcel 2, North 57° 24' 13" West, 1.757 meters; thence North 28° 42' 38" East, 55.804 meters to a point on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map; thence southwesterly along said last mentioned northwesterly line, South 20° 39' 38" West, 56.906 meters to a point of intersection with the southeasterly prolongation of said northeasterly line of said Parcel 2; thence northwesterly along said southeasterly prolongation, North 57° 24' 13" West, 6.230 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 222.4 square meters (2,394 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.3-13649 (13649-1) This real property description has been prepared by conformance with the Professional - nd Srveyor ct. Signature Date: ° e, or under my direction, in 000137 N:t99UVgMVRIG oixosu &49 ooc EXHIBIT A PAGE I a SCALE, 11500 PDR., SIN 1/4 SE:DT1 ON 15; 159; R-41111; SOM Zr PARCEL 2 kr PARCEL 1 ,§) 1. 4 01013 kik Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 47 NE'LY COR OF PCL 2. PM 6013. PUS 14/72 NWLY LINE OF STATE RTE 74 PER PUB 14/72 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 007 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1993. TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES EVEL DIISTANNCES.HOWN BY 1.00010335 . - - PARCEI. . 1649-1: AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.1 13649-1 SQUARE FEET, 2394 SOUARE METERS* 222.4 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • Being a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bemardino Base and Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of Califomia, as shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the centerline intersection of State Highway 74, (80.00 feet wide) [24.384 meters] with the centerline of River Road, (74.00 feet wide) [22.555 meters] as shown on Parcel Map 17381, filed in Book 105, Page 30 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence southeasterly along said centerline of River Road, South 72° 26' 29" East, 9.157 meters to a point of intersection with the southwesterly prolongation of the southeasterly line of said State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded in Book 406, Page 369 of deeds in said Office of said County Recorder, said southeasterly tine also being the northwesterly line of land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, recorded on April 10, 1984 as Instrument No. 72581 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder thence northeasterly along said southwesterly prolongation, North 20° 39' 38" East, 9.157 meters to the southwesterly comer of said land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, said comer being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, North 20° 39' 38" East, 57.942 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 209.310 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line and along said curve through a central angle of 30° 47" 30" an arc Iehgth df 112.486 meters tothe northwesterly comer of said land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, said northwesterly corner being the southwesterly comer of land granted to Raymond H. and Delores D. Rasmussen, recorded November 22, 1972, as Instrument No. 155251 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder tfance southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, and the -southwesterly line of said land granted to Raymond H, and Delores D. Rasmussen, South 63° 34' 32" East, 38.754 meters; thence South 35° 20' 27" West, 71.267 meters; thence South 62° 08' 58" West, 9.018 meters; thence South 31° 13' 04" West, 19.876 meters; thence South 10° 02 28" East, 8.978 meters; thence South 34° 57' 45" West, 7.999 meters; thence South.79° 57' 34" West, 8.486 meters; thence South 34° 57'.38"- West, 40.049 meters; thence South 54° 39' 22" East, 19.467 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, said southwesterly line being the northeasterly line of said River Road; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly and northeasterly line, North 72° 26' 29" West, 44.702 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 6641.8 square meters (71,491 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). 000139 EXHIBIT A .PAGE, 14 The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-34.3-13650 (13650-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or . under my direction, in conformance with the Professional and Surveyor Act. Signature Date: 0001-40 n Im • fors 1, . 430 Lice e Expires 9/30/01 3 zoo/ EXHIBIT A ,PAGE 15 SHEET 1 OF NW' Y CORNER OF INST. 72581 O.R. • SCALEI 111000 Aft. TPOB. SW'LY COR.OF HST. 725810.R. 9,s? 39,38 sa �� Sl2\ 30443, POC �T m6 X30 csoOq\k----_,.,26,f. INT. C RATA, F POR SIN J /4 75S; 13650-1 fr,,�r. lot 3e TSB 3 3, h � � q? NE'LY LINE OF GLEN C.J. FREESE PER INST 725810.R. REC. 4-10-84 SW'LY LINE OF RAYMOND H. & DELORES D.RASMUSSEN PER INST. (552510.R. REC. 8-22-72 %tinF' y�"� SECJ J5 R 11Uy sam S62' 08'58"W 9.018 m (29.587') NIO.02'28"W 8.978 m (29.455') S34 57'45"W 7.999 m (26.243') S79' 57'34"W 8.486 m (27.841') 4 PARCEL MAP J O a J 73x31 m ( 1 4q' 72X26'• ? 02m n4 6 l SW'LY LINE OF GLEN C.J. FREESE PER INST 725810.8. REC. 4-10-84 11040 ci PMB 105/30 PARCEL 3 000141 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES. SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L00010335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9864 TEL (909) 980-1982 FAX, MOW 941-0691 AREA DISTRICT O8 COUNTY RIVERSOE ROUTE T4 KLOPOST 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No4 SQUARE FEETI SQUARE METER& 13650-1 71.491 6.64L8 PARCEL 13650-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY bffigtT°�R�AGE-1b-- EXHIBIT "A" . Fee Being a portion of the Southwest _Quarter of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, as shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the north line of said Southwest Quarter, with the centerline of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on a Record of Survey filed in Book 42, Page 79 (incorrectly marked Book 42, Page 78 by County Recorder) of Records of Survey in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; thence westerly along said north line, South 89° 15' 13" West, 10.798 meters to a point on the northwesterly line of said State Highway No. 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside recorded In Book 406, Page 369 of Deeds in said Office of said County Recorder, said point being a point on a non-tangentcurve concave northwesterly having a radius of 864.006 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 58° 35' 16" East; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 06° 57' 33" an arc length of 104.942 meters to the northeasterly comer of land granted to Newton S. Kimes, recorded May 18, 1979, as Instrument 103029 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder, said comer being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, a radial line through said point bears South 51° 37' 43" East; thence continuing southwesterly along said northwesterly line, the southeasterly line of said land granted to Newton S. Kimes and said curve through a central angle of 02° 36' 52" an arc length of 39.425 meters; thence continuing southwesterly along said northwesterly and southeasterly line, South 40° 59' 09" West, 238.485 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 282.026 meters; thence continuing southwesterly along said northwesterly and southeasterly line and along said curve through a central angle of 13° 36' 16" an arc length of 66.964 meters; thence North 40° 48' 45" East, 155.553 meters; thence North 40° 28' 47" East, 143.321 meters; thence North 37` 51' 35" East, 35.866 meters to a point on the northerly line of said land granted to Newton S. Kimes, said northerly line being the southerly line of land .granted to John H. Kramer, et. al. recorded January 22, 1988,. - as Instrument. 18999 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder, said point being distant thereon, South 89° 14' 31" West, 14.350 meters from said northeasterly comer, thence easterly along said northerly and southerly line, North 89° 14' 31" East, 14.350 meters to the TRUE POINT OF.BEGINNING. Containing approximately 2814.3 square meters (30,293 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). 0001 ^ H.,991 EXHIBIT A PAGE I The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-34.6-13653 (13653-1) This real prope • - % escrip • n ! bee • prepa conformance e P ; s • • al Lai • : urv�4 Signature: Date: Exp 9/30/01 ✓tee /1/.02°i 000143, me, or under my direction, in ��R;� S� �r�(y �pHN liye' (<-• co me o * ( NO.4430 Exp. 09/30/01 �`�' EXHIBIT PAGE 11 " 589'1513"W 10.798m S58'3516 NORTH LINE OF SW% SEC IS. TSS. R4W QF 0., SLY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO JOHN H. ��) iJ e. KRAI4ER. ET.AT., I C) el HST.140.18999 0.R. l j REC. JAN. 22.1988 QA PM 7570 ?MS 29/46 A =06' S7'33- R=864.006m 1=104.942m /189'14'31"E 14.350m S9 31.43 -EN R/W NIT LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO NEWTON 5. KNES. INST. NO.103029 0.R.. REC. MAY 18,1979 13653-1 FOR SW 1/4 SEC 15 EXIST R/W Associated Engineers, Inc. 33a EAST SHEISY STREET ONTARIO. CA 9(764 TEL. (9091 9001952 FAX& 19091941-0691 AREA O(STRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST PARCEL Ho.: 13653-1 SOUARE FEET: 30293 4.144m (30'1 POC INTERSECTION OF 'NORTH LINE Of SV/4 WITH CENTERLNE OF STATE HIGHWAY 74 NWtY LINE OF STATE RTE 74 R/W TPOB NE1.Y COR OF LAND GRANTED TO NEWTON S. KIWES. 1/51.140.103029 O.R.. REC. MAY 18,1979 =02' 36'52' R=864.006m 1=39.425m l RS ''x21/9 SE'LY,LNE OF LAND GRANTED TO NEWTON S.I MAES, INST. NO.103029 O.R- REC.IAAT 18.1979: NWtT LINE STATE RTE 74 EXIST R/W � . IMP RTE 74 A 13'3696" R=282.02641 L=66.964m R/W RS 14/52 000144 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1000103 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 1=53-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY ITERAIIRREVIPth a I c EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 15, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of Califomia, as shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, said portion being shown on a Record of Survey filed in Book 74, Page 52 of Records of Survey in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the centerline intersection of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] with the centerline of River Road, (74.00 feet wide) [22.555 meters] as shown on Parcel Map 17381, filed in Book 105, Page 30 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, thence southeasterly along said centerline of River Road, South 72° 26' 29" East, 9.157 meters to a point of intersection with the southwesterly prolongation of the southeasterly line of said State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded in Book 406, Page 369 of deeds in said Office of the County Recorder, said southeasterly line also being the northwesterly line of land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, recorded on April 10, 1984 as Instrument 72581 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northeasterly along said southwesterly prolongation and said southeasterly and northwesterly line, North 20° 39' 38" East, 67.099 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 209.310 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 30° 47' 30" an arc length of 112.486 meters to the northwesterly corner of said land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, said northwesterly corner being the southwesterly corner of land granted to Raymond H. and Delores D. Rasmussen, recorded November 22, 1972, as Instrument 155251 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said northwesterly corner also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, a radial line through said point bears North 38° 32' 52" West; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line, the- northwesterly line of said land granted to Raymond H. and Delores D. Rasmussen and said curve, through a central angle of 03° 08' 17" an arc length of 11.464 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line and said last mentioned northwesterly line, North 54° 35' 25" East, 30.609 meters to the beginning of.a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 300.314 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line, said last mentioned northwesterly line and said curve, through a central angle of 13° 36' 16" an arc length of 71.307 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line and said last mentioned northwesterly line, North 40° 59' 09" East, 45.628 meters to the northwesterly comer of said land granted to Raymond H. and Delores D. Rasmussen, said northwesterly corner being the southwesterly comer of land granted to Theodore and Esther Evans recorded August 13, 1962 as Instrument 75741 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said land granted to Raymond H. and Delores. D. Rasmussen and the southwesterly line of said land granted to Theodore and Esther Evans, South 55° 10' 27" East, 17.532 meters; thence South 39° 44' 24" West, 104.734 meters; thence South 27° 26' 03" West, 21.588 meters; thence South 53 32' 46" West, 24.250 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said land granted to Raymond H. and Delores D. Rasmussen, said southwesterly line being the northeasterly tine of said land granted to Glen C.J. Freese, said point being My91MAMAPPIpn0 27651.000 EXHIBIT_A__PAGUID. 000145 distant southeasterly thereon, South 63° 34' 32" East, 38.754 meters from said southwesterly corner of said land granted to Raymond H. and Delores D. Rasmussen; thence northwesterly along said last mentioned southwesterly line and said last mentioned northeasterly line, North 63° 34' 32" West, 38.754 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 3669.9 square meters (39,502 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08 -RIB/ -74-34.5-13654 (13654-1) This real property description has been prepared b e, or under my direction, in conformance with the Profession % Land urvey Signature: Date: n lmbiors 1, L ' 430 Exp ',r-' 9/30/01 OF LAND sOHN at, ,p NO. 4430 Exp. 09/30/01 ;000146 MA991764MAPPIMGWEEDA176 EXHIBIT A .. PAGE. SW 1/4; SECT 15 T'v' S/R4 X11 SfM SCALEt h 1500 PM 1738J MB 105/30 Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST slaw ,RREET ONTARIO. CA 9FT64 TEL (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 PAI IYT V RAMC VP f1PO T AREA PARCEL Noa 13654-1 SOUARE FEET, 39502 RS 7.4/57 (4SEZr , s ro 000147 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00O)0335 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 136541 SKETCH TO ACCO L I 'SC i P " " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 4 as shown on Parcel Map No. 21632, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of Califomia, filed in Book 141, Pages 79 through 81 inclusive of Parcel Maps. in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 4, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (100.00 feet wide) [30.480 meters], as dedicated to the public and accepted by the County of Riverside on said parcel map, said point being the southwesterly terminus of that certain course shown as (N30� 49' 24" E, 344.21 feet) [104.915 meters] on said parcel map; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Parcel 4, North 31� 23' 05" East, 105.056 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 888.390 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 03� 04' 18" an arc length of 47.626 meters to the northwesterly corner of said Parcel 4; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Parcel 4, South 89� 55' 09" East, 4.942 meters; thence South 22� 54' 26" West, 22.419 meters; thence South 22� 43' 22" East, 8.477 meters; thence South 22� 16' 23" West, 8.000 meters; thence South 67� 16' 11" West, 8.485 meters; thence South 22� 16' 34" West, 13.883 meters; thence South_ 27� 43' 07" West, 53.082 meters; thence South 62� 16' 53" East, 99.186 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Parcel 4, said southerly line being the northerly line of Richard Street (30.00 feet half width) [9.144 meters] as shown on said Parcel Map; thence westerly along said southerly and northerly line, South 89� 15' 13" West, 103.386 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 36.573 meters; thence northwesterly along said southerly and northerly line and said curve through a central angle of 32� 07' 51" an arc length of 20.510 meters to an angle point; thence northerly along the corner cutoff for said Parcel 4, North 11� 07' 21" West, 10.337 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing approximately 4745.7 square meters (51,082 square feet) TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Richard Street). " The. bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6.. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-35.0-13661 (13661-1) This real propert " escription has been pr : red by ' e " r under my direction, in conformance with the Prof- : ron. La A 000148 MA99L1801APPINGWEEDSU366LOOC EXHIBIT _A PAGE, POB SW'LY COR OF PCL 6=32' OT'5r R=36.5T3m. L=20.5I0m 00 vv././ A. R/W claNi Arty C,)~ NW'LY COR OF PCL 4 589'55'09"E 4.942 m N'LY LINE OF P0. 4 S22'43'22"E 8.477 m S22'16'23"W 8.000 m S 5'LT LINE OF PCL 4 S89'15'13"W 103.386 m IMP RICHARD STREET 8Sq N'LY LIE OF RICHARD itmtT C EXIST RICHARD STREET CORD DATA PER PIA IIV79-81 Associated Engineers, Inc. 33M EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAXI (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST PARCEL. Noa 13661-1 SQUARE FEET: 51.082 6 Es Li w OBERT STREET 0 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED 3 ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 199 ZONE AN OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCESBY L00010 . TO • PARCEL. 13661-1 n o. SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 3 as shown on Parcel Map No. 21632 situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 141, Pages 79 through 81 inclusive/of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 3, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (100.00 feet wide) [30.480 meters] as dedicated to the public and accepted by the County of Riverside on said Parcel Map, said southeasterly line being a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 888.390 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 65� 19' 03" East; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Parcel 3 and said curve through a central angle of 02� 55' 11" an arc length of 45.270 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly and northwesterly line, North 21� 45' 46" East, 99.006 meters to the most northerly corner of said Parcel 3; thence South 19� 06' 47" West, 37.932 meters; thence South 22� 57' 29" East, 8.539 meters; thence South -21� 41' 05" West, 8.000 meters; thence South 66� 40' 58" West, 8.746 meters; thence South 22� 54' 26" West, 85.710 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Parcel 3, said southerly line being the northerly line of land described in a Trust Transfer Deed to M.V. Duffy James (Trustee), recorded May 19, 1992, as Instrument No. 180824 of Official Records in said Office of said County Recorder, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89� 55' 16" East, 1.118 meters from said southwesterly comer; thence westerly along said southerly and northerly line, North 89� 55' 16" West, 1.118 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 233.9 square meters (2,518 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-35.2-13663 (13663-1) This real property description has been prepared by i����" , or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Lan" Surveyors A Signature: Date: 4430 /������ so l M%sGF�� NO.4430 , Exp. 09/30/01 000150 EXHIBIT .A PAGE 95 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL (909) 980-1962 FAX. 19091 941-0891 PARCEL 1 PM 14290 PMB 88153 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE B ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF ZONE 6. MULTIPLY ISTANCES WN TO OBTAIN GRROI NL) DLEVEL DISTAANNCES.BY LOO 35 AREA 1 PARCEL 13663-1 PARCEL No.: 13663-1 SOUAl1E FEETt 2518 iligITT C •'.v nt " " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter, of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter and the South Half of the East One -Fifth of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 5 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, said Section being shown on an official plat on file in the District Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded July 7, 1915, in Book 406, Page 273 of Deeds in the Office of the County Recorder of said County with the southerly line of said Section 10, said State Highway 74 and southerly line shown on Parcel Map No. 9921, filed in Book 49, Pages 24 and 25 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, said point being distant westerly thereon, South 89� 11' 27" West, 549.021 meters from the southeasterly corner of said Section 10, said point also being a point on a curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1737.092 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 510 01' 04" East; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 02� 22' 45" an arc length of 72.131 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said northwesterly line, North 36� 36' 11" East, 162.842 meters to the point of intersection with the westerly line of Spring Street, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as described in a Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded August 22, 1960, as Instrument 73785 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northerly allong said westerly line, North 00� 09' 27" East, 17.452 meters to the northeasterly corner of land described in a document in favor of Annie R. Hayes, recorded on October 6, 1986 as Instrument 246619 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said northeasterly corner being the southeasterly corner of land granted to Nguu Viet Dinn et. al., recorded July 30, 1998, as Instrument 317386 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence westerly along the northerly line of said land described in a document in favor of Annie R.. Hayes, and the southerly line of said land granted to Nguu Viet Dinn et. al., South 89� 23' 31" West, 12.178 meters; thence North 38� 26' 54" East, 19.651 meters to a point on said westerly line, said westerly line being the easterly line of said land granted to Nguu Viet Dinn et. al.; thence southerly along said westerly and easterly line, South 00� 09' 27" West, 15.261 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 92.9 square meters (1,000 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Spring Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 0001r M:W9138),MAPPINGWEEDAIMN.00C EXHIBIT A PAGE a') 08-RIV-74-36.1-13684 (13684-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with e Professiona and ,urveyor,e ct. Signatur Date: 000153. ID L.S. 4430 LIC E EXPIRES 9/30/01 M_,991 N I36H.000 EXHIBIT A PAGEA. * SCALE: 1:1500 w'LY LINE SPRING ST TO CO OF RIV. PER 8457 73785 REC_ 8-22-60 COURSE DATA NO. BEARING DISTANCE LI S 89.23'31- w 12.178 m 1.2 N 30'26'54" E 19.651 m L3 S 00'09'27- w 15.261 m (S'IT LINE LANG TO NGUU VIET {IDINH. ET AL PER NV. 317386 O.R. REC. 7-30-98 • SHEET SPRING STREET • 9.7141m 9J44 EXIST R/W 001001 (N'LY LINE LAND TO ANNIE R. {HATES PER INST. 246619 0.R.. REC. 10-6-86 13684-1 SW 1/4 Sr 1/4; S G JOS `4 T5S;R4WS SBM c7 <k. - PM 9921 �-N� PPM 49/74;',75 / / POC NK'LRY LINE STATE SEC Nx 74 • 2- do A./. t e•e .s 1`' ry,• N 4.s- e ,--,t r' /41C , + '1/44,• 4:,,,./(4, . • / alp, 9� ^SR / Associated Engineers, Inc. 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAX: (9091 946-0891 / LI STREET m .� TPOB S89'P27"w 549.021m AREA DISTRICT COUNTY - ROUTE KILOPOST PARCEL No. 13684-1 SOUARE FEET: 1000 / SECTION 10 SECTION I5 000154 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009630 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13684-1 1\�\ ...w•••nlww\ wlw• •\11C0 11.1 Aww rM••OC .1CTCOC. o) p EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 12, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive/of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom the southerly 95 feet [28.956 meters] thereof measured along the easterly line of said Lot 12, as described in a Grant Deed to Salvador and Olga Madrigal, recorded October 11, 1989, as Instrument 351282 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 12, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres, said corner being on a curve concave easterly having a radius of 427.501 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 790 02' 18" West; thence southerly along said easterly line, the westerly line of said Lot and along said curve through a central angle of 06° 35' 12" an arc length of 49.145 meters to the southwesterly corner of said land 'granted to Salvador and Olga Madrigal; thence easterly along the southerly line of said land granted to Salvador and Olga Madrigal and the northerly line of land described in a Deed to Will Fenner, et. al., recorded August 11, 1953, as Instrument 39394 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, South 89° 30' 46" East, 18.155 meters; thence North 13° 45' 39" East, 50.381 meters to a point on the northerly line of said Lot; thence westerly along said last mentioned northerly line, South 89° 45 05" West, 23.584 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 1041.9 square meters (11,215 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.0-13714 (13714-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Signature - N IMBIORSKI, L.S. 4430 9/30/01 Date: EXHIBIT,_.AI . PAGE 000155 SCALE: 1:800 000 56 15240 m (50') Q •9.144 m 9.144 m (30') 1 (30'1 cr 1— w a J 0 POB NWLY COR LOT 12 589'30'46"E • 9!.155 m SHEET 1 OF 1 • PM b2b7 PM5 22/79 LOT 13 • LOT 12 N'LY LINE OF LAND TO WLL F'DMET. AL. PER INST. 39394 REC. 8-1-53 S'LY LINE OF LAND TO SALVADOR & OLCA MADRIGAL PER HST. 351282 0.R.. REC. 0-1-89 BLOCK C MAP. OF' CDD HOPE ACHES ADDITION NO., 2 MB 12/-4-6 LOT. 11 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASE ON THE CALFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 198 ZONE 6. MILLTILY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0000 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 334 EAST tHE.LBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 AREA PARCEL. No.: 13114-1 SOWARE FEET: 1215 PARCEL 13714-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST CIYIIDC ILLTCDC. N.. n tr5Falli:tftEs0 t _ " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 12, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive,of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom the southerly 95 feet [28.956 meters] thereof measured along the easterly line of said Lot 12, as described in a Grant Deed to Salvador and Olga Madrigal, recorded October 11, 1989, as Instrument 351282 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 12, said corner being on the. southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot, North 89� 45' 05" East, 23.584 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 76� 14' 21" East, 18.000 meters; thence South 13� 45' 39" West, 40.000 meters; thence North 76� 14' 21" West, 18.000 meters; thence North 13� 45' 39" East, 40.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 720.0 square meters (7,750 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.1-13714 (13714-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. ME Expire" 9/30/0 Date: mA99130V4APIINGWeEDA1371F2DOC iT - PAGE 00115' LOT PARCEL N89.45'05' E 23.584m NOCCOR LOT 12 TPOB a kM H S• SHEET I OF • PM 6262 PMH 22/79 LOT 13 LOT 12 N'LY LINE OF LAND TO WILL FENNER, ET. AL. PER UST. 39394 O.R.. REC. 8-1-53 S�'LY LINE OF LAM TO .SALVADOR 1351282 0.R.. � 10 1-8-89 INST. aLCK C MAP 05 0000 HOPE ACRES ADD 171"ON NO. 2 Mg 12/4-6 LOT 11 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE ON THE CAIJFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF BASED TO OBTAIN GROUND DISTANCES DISTANCES.HSHOWN I. Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91T64 E : TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAX* (9091941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST . 110 mw inc 1t 1111_f./M_9 PARCEL No4 (3714-2 SOUARE FEET TT50 SQUARE LETERS! T20.0 PARCH 13714-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY 1E5MbirtEACR " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 10, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the. Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom the northerly 53 feet [16.154 meters] thereof described as Parcel 4 in a Grant Deed to Bruce Wanderer, recorded January 9, 1984, as Instrument 4464 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 10, said comer being the point of intersection of the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] with the easterly line of Theda Street (20.00 feet wide) [6.096 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly Tine, North 14� 25' 58" East, 86.316 meters; thence South 17� 50' 46" West, 32.900 meters; thence South 16� 28' 59" West, 30.582 meters; thence South 14� 41' 35" West, 10.670 meters to a point on said easterly line, said point being distant northerly thereon, North 00� 13' 03" East, 12.629 meters from said most southerly comer; thence southerly along said easterly line, South 00� 13' 03" West, 12.629 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 160.6 square meters (1729 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Theda Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.1-13718 (13718-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature - Date: KI, L.S. 4430 EXMIBIfi A._ PAGE#.., 000159 SCALD 1:800 TO BRUCE WANDERER PER INST.4464 0.R.. STY UNE OF LAND REC. I-9-84 000 tik Associated Engineers, tnO. w W N V 15.240 m 6.09 (509 (20') SK' 41'35"W 10.610 m S00'13'03"11 12.629 m MOST S'LY COR LOT 10 16 in POI?. LOT 10 r 331I EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 900-1982 FA%: (909) 941-0891 ct AREA nN MIMI" v., hr s "DACT PARCEL Na. 13718-1 SQUARE FEET. IT29 SHEET 1 OF 1 LOT 15 LOT 14 1 DGi< rDi MAP OF CORD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 2 ma 12/4-6 LOT 13 THE ARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE B ON TIE CAUFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.000098 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13718-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY L.SC]/Ytril CLAD 1 tf*A ItT t n.� nue-1r own, EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 16, Block C, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2 situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly comer of said Lot 16; thence westerly along the southerly line of said Lot 16, South 89° 41' 33" West, 200.883 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing westerly along said southerly line, South 89° 41' 33" West, 25.810 meters to the southeasterly comer of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded March 17, 1983, as Instrument 49851 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, North 14° 17' 16" East, 28.192 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 502.921 meters; thence continuing northeasterly along said southeasterly line and along said curve through a central angle of 09° 11' 58" an arc length of 80.748 meters to a point on the northeasterly line - of said Lot 16; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 62° 07' 19" East, 36.777 meters; thence South 24° 44' 23" West, 95.026 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 3258.2 square meters (35,071 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.2-13724 (13724-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors A Signature: Date: WISSOCNEPCFR13199138\HAPPRIG101336113724.DOC 000161 EXHIBIT A PAGE 3�i , SHEET 1 OF 1 Y • SCALE[ ([1000 LOT • LOT 7 SE'LY LINE OF LAND TO STATE CALIFORNIA PER INST 49851 O.R, REC. 3-17-83' • LOT 8 ct 1 SE'LY CDR. OF LAND TO STATE CALIFORNIA PER INST 49851 O.R. REC. 3-1T-83 000162 ct- // 4i 25.810 m S89'41'3393 / ek- MAP Or GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO., 2 Ma 12/4-6 LOT IT aLOC1< C blr LOT 16 • S'LY LINE LOT 16 589'41'33"W V 200.683 m TPOB (E'LY CDR. LOT 16) LOT 15 POC (E'LY COR. LOT 16) THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. c. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.00009 i TO OBTAIPI GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. • ki, vu psr SHELBY STREET ONTARIQ, CA 91764 (909) 980-1982 FAX, (9091941-0891 A$sociated Engineers. Inc. AREA PARCEL Nos SQUARE FEET[ SQUARE NETERS[ 13724-1 35,07) 3.256.2 PARCEL 13724-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE KILOPOST 74 33.6/40.2 " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 4, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded February 4, 1983 as Instrument 22340 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of said Lot 4, said corner being on the southerly line of Mapes Road, (50.00 feet wide) [15.240 meters] as shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 77, Page 80 of Records of Survey in said Office of the1 C993 ountymeRecordeers to r; thence westerly along said southerly line, South 89 42' 25 West, beginning of a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 295.24thenc0 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 48� 48' 56" West; southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 05� 12' 12" an arc length of 26.813 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 40� 31' 58" East, 25.473 meters from said northeasterly corner; thence northwesterly along BEGINNING.northeasterly line, North 40� 31' 58" West, 25.473 meters to the POINT Containing approximately 24.8 square meters (267 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74, Theda Street and Mapes Road). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.6-13730 (13730-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Profession Land Surv/ or ct. M:X94138 APPINGWEEDS\11730.DOC EXHIBIT A PACES' 000163 SHEET I OF 1 SCALEI I:800 79 w N EXIST R/W- 10.660 m 6.096 m (20') 000164 POB NE'LY COR LOT 4 �^ S89 42'25"W 1.993 m LOT 5 A0 EXIST R/W— ,,---Q MAPES ROAD -S'LY LINE MAPES ROAD TO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PER INST. 234538 O.R. -REC. 09-24-86—. — — — — EXIST R/W RECORD Dr SURVEY rRSf 17/90 LOT 4 LOT 3 CDDD HOPr ACryr S ADDITION 2 BLOCK "0° ma J2/4-6 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 198' ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L000 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 330 EAST. SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.e 13730-1 SOUARE FEETI 267 SOUARE IAETERSt 24.8 PARCEL 13730-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY I LEGAL DE SaCR1P OB RIVERSIDE 74 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 3, Block "C" as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6, inclusive of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, recorded February 4, 1983 as Instrument 22340 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 3, said corner being on the southerly line of Mapes Road, (50.00 feet wide) [15.240 meters] as shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 77, Page 80 of Records of Survey in said Office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along said southerly line, North 89° 42' 25" East, 40.242 meters to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 264.760 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 42°49' 17" West; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 08° 26' 57" an arc length of 39.043 meters; thence South 55 37' 41" East, 92.089 meters; thence North 36° 42' 01" East, 5.086 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 40° 33' 27" East, 5.796 meters to a point on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74 (50.00 feet half width [15.240 meters] as shown on said Record of Survey, said northwesterly line also described in said Grant Deed to the State of California; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line, South 40° 36' 47" West, 67.829 meters to the most southerly corner of said Lot, as shown on said Record of Survey; thence North 31° 25' 23" East, 33.416 meters to a point on a line parallel with and 30.480 meters southwesterly, measured at right angles from the aforementioned line that bears, South 55° 37' 41" East, 92.089 meters; thence northwesterly along said parallel line, North 55° 37' 41" West, 88.800 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly having a radius of 295.240 meters, said curve being concentric with and 30.480 meters southwesterly -measured radial from the aforementioned curve having a radius of 264.760 meters; thence northwesterly along said concentric curve through a central angle of 09.° 14' 24" an arc length of 47.613 meters to a point on said southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 40° 31' 58" East, 25.473 meters from said most westerly comer; thence northwesterly along_ said southwesterly line, North 40° 31' 58" West, 25.473 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 4746.6 square meters (51,092 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Mapes Road). The bearings and distances used . in .the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00009630 to obtain ground level distances. 000165 M:199I3aWAPPINGICEEDS113732AOC EXHIBIT PAGE AD 08-RIV-74-37.6-13732 (13732-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: Expir Date: 00166 SKI, .S. 4430 MA9913AMAPIVOGADEEDSU373LDOC EXHIBITA, PAGEAI_ POB MOST W'LY COR LOT 3 RS 77/80 LOT 4 R/W n 0 0 L \\\I\ LOT 14 B 3 REMAINDER 1.25'23"E 33.416 m R/W ' S-40 36'47"W 67.829 NW'LY LINE OF LAND TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER INST. 22340 0.R.. REC. 2-4-83 _JOLD R/w OLD R/W SHEET I- OF 542'4917"W IR) REMAINDER 2 N36'42'01'1 5.086 m NW9_Y UNE OF STATE HWY 74 E S40' 33'2T"E 5.796 m SCALE, It 1000 LOT 15 al OCK b MAP OF GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO. 2 MB 12/4-6 EXIST R/W c_ IMP RTE 74 EXIST R/W SOLD RTE 74 ktk Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. 1909) 980-1982 FAX, 4909) 941-0891 LOT 17 LOT 1 \ 0 n E OLD Raw THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 4000096 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. AREA PARCEL No.r 13132-1 SQUARE FEET, 51092 Pam t37YilP 16 7 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL „ ESICR 1 lagliPttlf A, DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Parcel 1, as shown on Parcel Map 11505, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of Califomia, filed in Book 56, Pages 30 and 31 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly comer of said Parcel 1; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, South 50� 08' 05" East, 189:965 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 50� 08' 05" East, 4.891 meters to the southwesterly comer of land described in a Grant Deed to the State of Califomia, recorded November 3, 1982 as Instrument 190780 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder thence easterly along the northerly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California, North 85� 03' 21" East, 6.263 _meters to a point on a non -tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 624.841 meters, a radial line through said point bears North 49� 03' 25" West' thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to the State of California and along said curve through a central angle of 02� 13' 07" an arc length of 24.194 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 1, said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of Lot 19, Block B of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line and said last mentioned southwesterly line, North 41� 51' 45" West, 7.897 meters; thence South 44�33' 44" West, 29.825 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 237.2 square meters (2,553 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1:00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.8-13752 (13752-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: 000168 EXHIBIT A PAGE, ,_ SCALE, h 500 0 0) N O IDENTj \A„.HT LO7 18 BLK a CORD HOPE- ACRES ADDITION NO, 2 ma 12/4-6 O co N E PM NO. 11505 PM8 56/30-31; HIV. CO LOT 19 "9 • LOT 17 000169 Ilk 33n EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 9(164_ TEL. (909) 980-1962 FAX. (909) 941-0891 Associated Engineers, Inc. PARCEL 1 �� ./ 09 ` / / THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, Mt TO OBTAIN GROUND NE 6. MULTPLYD LEVEL DIS ANCES.SHOWNBY Eiirk 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 y-kN'oQ446<b° L: Sk �.Q� AO AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE IOLOPOST 08 RIVERSCE 74 33.6/402 PARCEL No.: 13752-1 SQUARE FEET, 2.553 SAAR€ NETE s 237.2 PARCEL 13752-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 1, as shown on Parcel Map 11505, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 56, Pages 30 and 31 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Parcel 1; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, South 50° 08' 05" East, 169.865 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 50° 08' 05" East, 20.100 meters; thence North 44° 33' 44" East, 9.354 meters; thence North 45° 26' 16" West, 20.033 meters; thence South 44° 33' 44" West, 11.000 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 203.9 square meters (2,195 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-37.8-13752 (13752-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors ct Signat Date: H es 9130/01 I. L. m EXHIBIT. PAGEA,5_. 0 0 0170 .' SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALEt 11500 PERT jQ LO7 18 E M CO aL1< H GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 2 MF 12/4-6 rov LO7 P9 PM NO., 11505 PMb 56/30-31i1 . R 1 V , CO ttots LO7 17 ,s* 00017 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BI ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF TOOOB AN GROUND IPLY DISTANCES LEVEL DISTANCES.ANWN DiY 1.00 ck's kAssociated Engineers, Ina 3IpEAiT SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 t TEla. I90919Q0-19Q2 FA74 {909! 941-0491 PARCEL 1 AREA PARCEL Noi 13752-2 SQUARE FEET. 2495 WHAM 1cmec. 7n19 o ov, it"/ / Cyv PARCEL. 13762-2 SKETCH TO : ACC s It ANY tTDFACII t`t DISTRICT COUNTY KR0P0ST " " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Parcel 1, as shown on Parcel Map 11505, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 56, Pages 30 and 31 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwesterly comer of said Parcel 1; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly tine of said Parcel 1, South 50� 08' 05" East, 189.965 meters; thence North 44� 33' 44" East, 26.819 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 44� 33' 44" East, 3.006 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Parcel 1, said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of Lot 19, Block B, Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 2, filed in Book 12, Pages 4 through 6 inclusive of Maps in said Office of the County Recorder, thence northwesterly along said northeasterly line and said last mentioned southwesterly line, North 41� 51' 45" West, 20.039 meters; thence South 44� 33' 44" West, 3.006 meters; thence South 41� 51' 45" East, 20.039 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 60.1 square meters (647 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV 74-37.8-13752 (13752-3) This real property description has been- prepared by me; or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Date: EXHIBIT A�� PAGE AO 00017r. SCALE: 11500 S - 1DENt\{! LOT 18 8 SHEET 1 OF 1 "ILK g GOOD HOPE ACRES ADD171ON N0J 2 MS 12/4-6 PM NO , 11505 PNIa 56/30-31; R 1 V, CO , 42. qt LOT 17 000173 TPOB Associated Engineers, Inc.. 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL (909) 960-1922 FA)k 1909) 941-0891 WSTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST PARCEL 1 AREA PARCEL Ho.. SQUARE FEET. LOT 19 ,°"Y/ THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE B ON THE CALFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF ZONE 6. MULTPLY TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCESHOWNS LO PARCEL 13762.3 13T52-3 i SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY 64TI „ DERCR .AQ " Exhibit "A" Fee Uneconomic Remnant THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE SOUTHWEST 75.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST 125.00 FEET OF LOT 20 OF GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO. 1, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11 PAGE 87 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 21 OF SAID GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO. 1, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CURVED NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 21, SOUTHWESTERLY. 19.00 FEET MEASURED ON_ SAID CURVE, FROM THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 21, SAID CURVE IS CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAS A RADIUS OF 1940.08 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 32� 25'.56" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 19.00 FEET ON SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00� 33' 40" TO THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 21; THENCE SOUTH 36� 55' 00" EAST ON THE NORTHEAST LINE OF SAID LOT BEING THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT 20, TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 125.00 FEET OF LOT 20; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 125.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING WHICH PASSES THROUGH THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 21; THENCE NORTHWEST ON EAST SAID LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (APN 342-200-032) CTPN: 13780-1 EXHIBITS PAGES � U 017 4 " /6-44 342-20 DAK 3/e7 MAW 1. 13 8/M" OCD AKl /7 el es N tMNO J-4 (47,32 fsr, 1, 'Art w,en. 1172 d/tr MA M, e or �e is 3. 3 V3. 3, WIPPM $7 3139 9877 w" 9? 1174 J! 33 . f1 Xt. f4Z 3/77 t. PS t" 7I 4a '/a x,7.64 ,24, 24 57,32. 4ad46 as 44,31 PP rR. A. 87/4 L..L 4.4642. 2 24 v 1.1 4.7 4e..1 25 dis /t " G'411 PCR. SE 1/4, SE C. 2, T5S., R.4W. /M. c At MIS MAP rS pea ASSSSSME Mr PURPOSES ONLY f " !! Sl \, '+C Mit Y.00Akt 41A , P .M 4169 id , , ,,s 6a 1./5� 46 /B 4 B9 r.re *Ac. lai,A9 v /1 .46' .f /.'8422 � A _ 1.1.17 s `i 32 1':1 3'4422 03.14. 2.38A22 42 6d' G .1r.r9-4c l/7Aa* 2,394 2& il4!' 4 200 AA* /1J acs.is" 7 4 .75Aet It? _ au.rs' B 4.174 2� 29 Mil li 4,��.2 SO Jail'Jes.,1 02. er 447422 s *A.Rf 7 t .- yr��.ts" a.4, 4, 4J ��6 2 us ;S. 3rd./1 EX. " 0.55.421 /6 e" Goad Hope Acres Addition Na / MB ///87 1972 RS' 60/10 ,AtA: R.d. 7V11 ASSESSOR'S MAP at 342 P61.0 R/VERS/DE COU NTY, CALL. 06. 1 deli CFI EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 10, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Quitclaim Deed to Robert and Viola Mae Strange, recorded January 1, 1986, as Instrument 3443 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot, said point being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters) as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot, North 530 39' 10" East, 21.376 meters to the most easterly corner of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Robert and Viola Mae Strange; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Robert and Viola Mae Strange, and the southwesterly line of land described in an Affidavit, Death of Joint Tenant, to Marian Ellen Frederick, recorded October 7, 1998, as Instrument 435170 of Official Record in said Office of the County Recorder, North 36° 16' 38" West, 12.239 meters; thence South 47° 35' 02" West, 21.499 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 36° 16' 38" West, 9.966 meters from said most southerly comer; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 36° 16' 38" East, 9.966 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 237.3 square meters (2,554 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.0--13798 (13798-1) This real property . - scription s been prepa conformance wi Pr Sury Signature; Date: RSKI, L.S. 4430 O/ me, or under my direction, in 000176 EXHIBIT A PAGE, O a w -J 4-7 LOT 8 _ t 01 O N .O k. EXIST MOUNTAIN AVENUE GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 1 MS II/97 LOT 9 ♦ 000177 / / /. / O LOT 10 NE'LY LINE OF LAND QUITCLAIMED TO ROBERT AND VIOLA MAE STRANGE AS INST. NO. 3443 O.R., REC. 1-01-1986 SW'LY LINE OF LOT 10 POB S'LY COR OF LOT 10 ,1A GOOD HOPE ACRES v /- ADDITION NO. 1 all:1 /' MB 11/87 , - ./ / / LOT 14 IMP MOUNTAIN_ -AVENUE SW'LY LINE OF LAND AFFIDAVIT TO MARIAN ELLEN FREDERICK AS INST. NO. 435170 O.R., REC. 10-07-1998 ELY COR OF LAND QUITCLAIMED TO ROBERT AND VIOLA MAE STRANGE AS INST. NO. 3443 O.R., REC. 1-01-1986 4.3 0 LOT 13 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM 0. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY SHOWN TO OBTAIN GROUNDDLEVEL CDIESSTANCES.BY 1 47 Mandated Engineers, Inc. 33N EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL -19091 980-1982 FAXi (909) 941-0891 AREA PARCEL Nos 13798-1 SOUARE FEET: 2554 PARCEL 13798-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE AILOPOST CMIADC IICTCD[. 717 Z " " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 10, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of Califomia, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Quitclaim Deed to Robert and Viola Mae Strange, recorded January 7, 1986, as Instrument 3443 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southerly line of Mountain Avenue, formerly known as Lot A, (20.00 feet wide) [6.096 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence easterly along said southerly line and the northerly line of said Lot 10, North 89� 35' 10" East, 10.404 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said southerly and northerly line, North 89� 35' 10" East, 15.973 meters to the most northerly comer of said land described in a Quitclaim Deed to Robert and Viola Mae Strange; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said land described in a Quitclaim to Robert and Viola Mae Strange and the southwesterly line of land described in an Affidavit, Death of Joint Tenant, to Marian Ellen Frederick; recorded October 7, 1998, as Instrument 435170 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, South 36� 16' 38" East, 3.752 meters to a point on a line parallel with and 3.041 meters southerly measured at right angles from said southerly line; thence westerly along said parallel line, South 89� 35' 10" West, 18.171 meters; thence North 00� 24' 50" West, 3.041 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 51.9 square meters (559 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Mountain Avenue). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.9--13798 (13798-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professiona Land Survey " rs Act. Signatur Date: AM Expi v 9/30/01 L.S. 4430 0001'?8 N. EXHIBIL A,_. PAGE$! - w .v -J 0v'' V N P.Q F E cn m 0 POC WIT COR OF LOT 10 6000 HOPE ACRES ADDITION 140.1 MB 11/87 LOT 8 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 1 Me II/27 LOT 9 18.171m 589' 35'10"W 0798- N'LY COR OF LANG QUITCLAIMED TO ROBERT AND VIOLA MAE STRANGE AS INST. N0. 3443 0.R.. REC. 1-01-1986 C_ EXIST MOUNTAIN AVENUE S'LY LINE OF MOUNTAIN ' . _ AVENUE PER MB 11/87 S36.16'38"E 3.752m R CE IMP MOUNTAIN__ AVENUE LOT 10 NE'LY LINE OF LAND QUITCLAIMED TO ROBERT AND VIOLA MAE STRANGE AS INST. NO. 3443 O.R.. REC. 1-01-1986 0.Q017- Associated Engineers, k c. 33A EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (9091980-1962 FAXt (9091941-0491 COUNTY ROUTE RIVERSIDE 74 IULOPOST AREA PARCEL. Nos 13798-2 SOUARE FEET& 559 SOUARE METERS: 51.9 SW'LY LINE OF LANG AFFIDAVIT TO MARIAN - ELLEN FREDERICK AS INST. NO. 435170 O.R.. REC. 10-07-1998 0 LOT 13 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983• ZONE GRROOU NDLEVEL DISTANCES SHOWN BY 34 DISTANCES. TO PARCEL 13798-2 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DISTRICT 08 33.6/402 Exhibit "A" Fee Uneconomic Remnant THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 10 OF GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO. 1, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11, PAGE 87 OF MAPS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH 36° 57' WEST, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 237.45 FEET, TO THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 88° 59' EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 85.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 36° 57' EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, 187.53 FEET, TO A PONT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTH 530 03' WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (APN 342-140-010) (APN 342-140-011) (APN 342-140-012) CTPN: 13802-1 EXHIBIT A PAGE SS 80 342-14 o.rt DUI It Ilktm raA. 87/4 MARDI 1972 , 2R. SE //4 SEC. 2, r5S. , R.4W. Good hope Acres Add/lion No./ MB /1/87 ASSESS OR'S MAR 8I4 342 PG.14 RIVERSIDE QYJMY, CAC/. PY1411 1T A PAGE_ EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 14, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Violet M. Graves, et.al., recorded May 20, 1996, as Instrument 116240 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded April 24, 1975 as Instrument 47025 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said exception to the County of Riverside, said corner being on the southeasterly line of said Lot and the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres, said corner also being distant southwesterly thereon, South 54° 05' 03" West, 24.929 meters from the most easterly corner of said Lot; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Grant Deed to Violet M. Graves, et.al. and the southwesterly line of a Quitclaim Deed to Vincent R. Graves, recorded January 20, 1983, as Instrument 12586 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, North 54° 37' 50" West, 6A20 meters to the most northerly corner of. said exception to the County of Riverside, said corner being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly and southwesterly line, North 54° 37' 50" West, 10.160 meters; thence South 52° 55' 13" West, 11.816 meters; thence South 54° 00' 28" West, 3.709 meters to a point on the northerly line of said exception to the County of Riverside; thence easterly along said northerly line, North 89° 35' 10" East, 13.947 meters; thence continuing along said northerly line, North 71° 37' 10" East, 4.325 meters; thence continuing along said northerly line, North 53° 39' 10" East, 3.305 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 99.7 square meters (1,073 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Mountain Avenue). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.0-13803 (13803-1) This real property description ha ,• een prepare•' b me, or under my direction, in conformance with 'rof Signature' P Date: L.S. 4430 tit, try''9 NO.4430 *! Exp. 09/30/01 Q ` OF CtiNN WRIT A PAG 000182 Lo -r 13 GOOD HOPr. ACRES ADDITION NO, 3 \NNMEI 12/3 EXIST R/W E U) f!1 0001.83 N LOT 14 44P Shy 13803-i) N89' 35'I0"E 13.947m COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE INST. N0. 47025 0.R. REC. 4-24-1975 SW'LY LINE OF LANO QUITCLAIMED TO VINCENT R. GRAVES AS INST. NO.12586 0.R.. REC. 1-20-1983 NEVI' LINE OF LANO GRANTED TO VIOLET M. GRAVES ET. AL.. AS INST. NO.116240 O.R., REC. 5-20-1996 N71' 3 7'10'E 4.325m EXIST MOUNTAIN AVENUE E'LY COR OF 14151. N0. 47025 REC. 4-24-1975 69 'Job J9 s• N'LY LINE OF INST. N0. 47025 0.R.. / REC. 4-24-1975 / 1A `146 �k. - — - — - — - — - — - ' •c, ((L.O' Al` p5 `Sl� � S 0 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES. SHOWN BY 1.047 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX, (9091 941-0891 AREA OISTRI T ' COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSIDE 74 KILOPOST 33.6/40.2 PARCEL Nom 13803-1 SOUARE FEET: 1073 SOUARE METERS: 99.7 PARCEL 13803-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY " " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 14, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Violet M. Graves, et.al., recorded May 20, 1996, as Instrument 116240 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, excepting therefrom that portion thereof described in a Grant Deed to the County of Riverside, recorded April 24, 1975 as Instrument 47025 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said exception to the County of Riverside, said corner being on the southeasterly line of said Lot and the northwesterlyline of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres, said comer also being distant southwesterly thereon, South 54� 05' 03" West, 24.929 meters from the most easterly comer of said Lot; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Grant Deed to Violet M. Graves, et.al. and the southwesterly line of a Quitclaim Deed to Vincent R. Graves, recorded January 20, 1983, as Instrument 12586 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, North 54� 37' 50" West, 16.580 meters; thence. South 52� 55' 13" West, 3.816 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 52� 55' 13" West, 8.000 meters; thence North 37� 04' 47" West, 6.000 meters; thence North 52� 55' 13" East, 8.000 meters; thence South 37� 04' 47" East, 6.000 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 48.0 square meters (517 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.0-13803 (13803-2) This real property description has b - : prepared y m or under my direction, in conformance with t rofe Signature: IM . " , L.S. 4430 Tress 0/01 Date: 0U0184 EXHIBIT A PAGE l * Y LOT 13 GOOD HOPE ADF S ADDITION NO 3 NNNNIV.P.8 12/36 s �. .5P 0 EXIST R/W—� E .0 m 0 0 N 000185 LOT 14 EXIST R/W - N COUNTY tw Y UNE OF LANO OUITCLAIMEO TO VINCENT R. GRAVES AS INST. NO.12586 O.R.: REC. 1-20-19113 q1 NE'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO VIOLET M. GRAVES ET. AL.. AS INST. NO.116240 O.R.. REC. 5-20-1996 E'LY LINE OF LOT 14 E'LY COR OF INST. 110.47025 0.R.. REC. 4-24-1975 tit Y LINE OF INST. NO. 47025 0.R.. I REC. 4-24-1975 I I I ' OF RIVERSIDE I / 1' INST. NO. 47025 0.R. I I .�i`0 ... �/ REC. 4-24-1975 - I I A A / Z Ate. %N %�1. EXIST MOUNTAIN AVENUE �__ __________ E'LY C0R OF LOT 14 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF TOOBTAIN G 11 ONE 6. ROUND aLEVEL DIS STANCESAN ES.BY 1. 7G Aosociated Engineers, Inc 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. 19091 900-9E52 FAXs (909) 941-0591 AREA PARCEL No.: 13803-2 SOUARE FEETs 517 PARCEL 13803-2 &liVrALUEL0.. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST civiloC £ICTCRc- AR " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 12, 13 and 14, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in Quitclaim Deeds to Vincent R. Graves, recorded July 30, 1973, as Instrument 99385 of Official Records, recorded January 20, 1983, as Instrument 12585 of Official Records and recorded January 20, 1983, as Instrument 12586 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 12, said point being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southwesterly along the southeasterly line of said Lots 12, 13 and 14 and said northwesterly line, South 53� 39' 10" West, 146.782 meters to the most southerly corner of land described in said Quitclaim to Vincent R. Graves as Instrument 12586 of Official Records; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said land described in said Instrument 12586 of Official Records and the northeasterly line of land described in a Grant Deed to Violet M., Walter R. and Vincent R. Graves, recorded May 20, 1986, as Instrument 116240 of Official Records in said Office of the County . Recorder, North 54� 37' 50" West, 16.580 meters; thence North 52� 55' 13" East, 30.139 meters; thence North 54� 05' 03" East, 121.865 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 12, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 36� 17' 26" West, 15.210 meters from said most easterly corner of Lot 12; thence southeasterly along said last mentioned northeasterly line, South 36� 17' 26" East, 15.210 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 2348.7 square meters (25,281 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.1-13804 (13804-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signatur A T : JOHN IMBIORSKI, LS. 4430 Ex.' es 9/0/01 Date: MA99 .00C EXHIBIT A PAGE to I 000186 SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALES 1tIWWO LOT 14 GOOD HOPE AGRr S ADDITION NO J 3 MS 12/36 LOT 13 \ NE'LY LINE LAND TO VIOLET M.. WALTER R. k VINCENT R. GRAVES PER INST.16240 O.R.. REC. 5-20-86 4k 1 SVLY UNE LAND TO VINCENT R. GRAVES PER INST.12586 o.R.. REC. I-20-83 litk Associated Engineers. Inc. 336 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1962 FAXa (9091941-0891 DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIVERSIDE ROUTE 1.4 IDLOPOST 334/402 LOT 12 o LOT 11 AREA PARCEL. Now 13804-1 SQUARE FEETt 25281 SQUARE IETE S. 2,348.T LOT 2 LOT 1 vS �E N�Pa • POB E'LY COR LOT 12 LOT 3 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, TO O 6. BTAIN GROUND LEVEL SHOWN BY 1.00002470 PARCEL 13804-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FXI-m411 L1 DAriC " EXHIBIT "A" Being a portion of Lot 40, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Good Hope Missionary Baptist Church, recorded May 24, 1978, as Instrument 104016 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 40, said point being on the southerly line of Mountain Avenue, (20.00 feet half width) [6.096 meters] as shown on a Record of Survey, filed in Book 46, Page 57 of Records of Survey in said Office of the County Recorder; thence easterly along said southerly line, North 89� 35' 10" East, 35.051 meters to the northeasterly corner of said Grant Deed to Good Hope Missionary Baptist Church; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Grant Deed to Good Hope Missionary Baptist Church and the westerly line of a Grant Deed to Bobbie Welch recorded May 2, 1973, as Instrument 56281 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, South 00� 29' 54" West, 2.700 meters to a point on a line parallel with and 2.700 meters southerly measured at right angles from said southerly line; thence westerly along said parallel line, South 89� 35' 10" West, 10.496 meters to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 29.958 meters; thence southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 30� 21' 00" an arc length of 15.869 meters; thence South 59� 14' 10" West, 11.092 meters to a point on the westerly line of said Lot, said point being distant southerly thereon, South 00� 29' 54" West, 12.412 meters from said northwesterly corner; thence northerly along said westerly line North 00� 29' 54" East, 12.412 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 180.1 square meters (1,938 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (Mountain Avenue). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, , Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain. ground levet distances. 08 -RI V-74-39.1-13805 (13805-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional La urveyors t. Signature: Date: N IMBI " SKI, L.S. 4430 /30/01 k_ANU 006188 MSSOCVEPCFRES1901 EXHIBIT A PAGEfe3 *7 • ,sir t .,' • • 4• ♦ LOT 1 P0B HWLY COR LOT 40 PER NAP OF GOOD HOPE ACRES. ADDITION NO. 1. MB 1/87 N LOT 11 000 18 Associated Engineers, Inc. E N 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. 19091 980-1982 FAX, (9091 941-0891 00 V• .43 ♦ • ♦ LOT 7 GOOD HOPS ACRES ADDITION NO, 3 M8 12/36 MOUNTAIN AVENUE S'LT LINE MOUNTAIN AVENUE W'LY LINE OF LOT 40 . N89"35'IO"E 35.051m p-30"21'00" 11.29.958m L.I5.869m I OT 40 GOOD HOPE ACRES ADDITION NO, 1 MB 11/3-7 10.496m — S89"35'K W 2.700M E LY LINE OF GRANT DEED TO GOOD HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH PER INST. NO.104016 O.R.. REC. 5-24-1978 AREA DISTRICT 08 COUNTY ROUTE RIVERSIDE • 74 KLOPOST 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.: 13805-1 SOUARE FEET: 1938 SOUARE METERS: 180.1 ♦ ♦ • • • NLY LINE • OF LOT 40 W'LY LINE OF GRANT DEED TO BOBBIE WELCH PER lc"— INST. NO. 562810.R.. REC. 5-02-1973 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ZOT6CALFORNIA COORDINATE MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY ZONE .I 024 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13805-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY thTX N EXHIBIT "A" Fee • • Being those portions of Lots 1 and 2, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] formerly known as County Highway, as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 2, South 36° 19' 53" East, 5.046.. meters; thence South 54° 05' 03" West, 96.699 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 1, said southerly line being the northerly line of Mountain Avenue (20.00 feet half width) [6.096 meters], formerly known as County Road, as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence westerly along said southerly and northerly line, South 89° 35' 10" West, 7.359 meters to a point of intersection with said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly fine and the northwesterly line of said Lots 1 and 2, North 53° 39' 10" East, 102.656 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 465.6 square meters (5,012 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Mountain Avenue). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California. Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-R1V-74-39.1-13806 (13806-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signat Date: JOHN IMBIORSKI, L.S. 4430 Exfres 9/30/01 ,4)7,25,-,P0/ 0001.90 04:,99, o& EXHIBIT A PAGE L' \ \\�zz GOOD HOPE AGRE,S \ ADD 171 ON NO. 3 \\ MD 12/36 \ \ \ \ SCALER 111000 \ LOT 12 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ L07 13 \ \ \ ch6 sr LOT 11 MOUNTAIN AVENUE S89.3590"W 7.359 1n 000191 ASSOblitied Engineers, Inc. 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-(982 FAXs (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE K8.OPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/402 A • LO7 3 S AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. 0 GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13806-1 CALIFORNIA ZONE 6. M ULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0000 ON THE THE BEARING TO OBTAN PARCEL. Nos 13806-1 1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY SQUARE FEEr1 so12 LEGAL DESCRIPTION i SQUARE METERS: 465.6 " EXHIBIT "A" Being a portion of Lot 9, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 3, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 12, Page 36 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Lot, said corner being at the point of intersection of the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] with the westerly line of Sophie Street, formerly known as Lot B, (20.00 feet wide) [6.096 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence northerly along said westerly line and the easterly line of said Lot, North 01� 36' 35" East, 17.941 meters; thence South 53� 36' 50" West, 61.170 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 36� 19' 29" West, 14.828 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 36� 19' 29" East, 14.828 meters to said most southerly corner, said most southerly corner being on said northwesterlyline, said most southerly corner also being on, a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1737.104 meters, a radial line through said corner bears South 36� 20' 50" East; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line, the southeasterly line of said Lot and said curve through a central angle of 01� 39' 15" an arc length of 50.147 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 810.2 square meters (8,721 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Sophie.Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.4-13813 (13813-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyor Ac MA991]ByMPFINGW�S11)B11;DOC 000192 cvuURUT a PAGE L/) 1- H N W a 0 0 O O N. W W J z m ..) E'l Y UNE __ J i N OF LOT 9 W 3 a LOT 9 6.096m ' 120') GOOD HOPE AGRES i\DD1 r1 ON NO, 3 111E 12/317) SW'LY LINE p� OF LOT 9 4;G 4;) LOT 10 ST.Y COR OF LOT 9 / O i 7 3813-- SSP 1A i Q 01 _ \5 -1. i in Zia 0 IIt cr . V) • W P08 SE'LY COR OF LOT 9 cis • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZOTONE 6. MULTIPLY OBTA N GROUND DLEVEL DISTANCES. ISTACES SHOWN BY 1.0470 Associated Engineers, Inc. 3 11EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARK). CA 9(764 TEL. (9091 980-1982 FAXs (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST n.*,rofMr 7d 44 a/e0.7 PARCEL No» SOUARE FEET: SOUARE METERS: 13813-1 8721 810.2 PARCEL 13813-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY th TDr�ATdE_k EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 98, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 98, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 35' 46" East, 13.490 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 15.240 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 37' 05" East, 13.056 meters from the most westerly comer of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 37' 05" West, 13.056 meters to said most westerly corner, said most westerly comer being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.238 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 202.2 square meters (2,176 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.5-13825 (.13825-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Date: lorski, L.S. 4430 000194 GXNiRIT A PAGE.._ " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 7 and 8, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 8, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 8, North 42� 40' 51" West, 14.365 meters; thence South 47 08' 09" West, 30.475 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 7, said point being distant thereon, North 42� 41' 29" West, 14.130 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot 7; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 42� 41' 29" East, 14.130 meters to said most southerly corner, said most southerly comer being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lots, North 47� 34' 40" East, 30.473 meters to, the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 434.2 square meters (4,674 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.6-13827 (13827-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 0001 p., MA9i1EMI PPINGWEEDRIM27.00[ EXHIBIT _._..PAGES SHEET 1 OF 1 * Y SCALE' 1'1000 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0001 7 \ THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN AREF S83 TO ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 6. MULTPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY LO TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. tk Associated Engineers. Inc. AREA 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 PARCEL j 13827-i T. 190919804982 FM 941-0891 SOUARE FEET' 4.674 DISTRICT CO Ty ROUTE KLOPOST tut 'nvracnF 74 33.6/40.2 SOUARE DETERS' 434.2 PARCEL 13827-1 SKETCH TOACCOMPANY LEGAL ESCRI� PEA EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 92, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of Califomia, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as 'follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the. southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42° 31' 56" East, 16.094 meters; thence South 49° 12' 32" West, 15.244 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, said. point being distant southeasterly thereon, South 42° 32' 01" East, 15.660 meters from the most westerly comer of said Lot; thence northwesterly along said southwesterly line, North 42° 32' 01" West, 15.660 meters to said most westerly comer, said most westerly comer being on said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.238 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 241.9 square meters (2,604 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.6-13832 (13832-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signature: 1 Date: MA99U1KMNPING EIDAD57t4ot 000198 EXHIBIT A PAGEah_ SHEET 1 OF 1 SCALE' 11800 \ \ \ \ 000199 Associated Engineers, Inc. 334 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91T64 TEL. (909) 960-1982 FAX, (909) 941-0891 OISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KI_OPOST c /an 7 1a C1* \c" AREA PARCEL. No.1 13632-1 SOUARE FEET( 2.604 SOUARE METERS' 241.9 (§) • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE. CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1962, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY TO OBTAIN GROOUNDDLEVEL DIST ISTANCES SHOWN LEVEL PARCEL 13832-1 _S�K�EET�CpH TO ACCOMPANY,p,7 tXt11Cl�_ �SCIrHl�eins " Exhibit "A" Temporary Construction Easement Being a portion of Lot 92, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the " unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southeasterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot, South 42� 31' 56" East, 16.094 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said northeasterly line, South 42� 31' 56" East, 6.003 meters; thence South 49 12' 32" West, 15.244 meters; thence North 42� 32' 01" West, 6.003 meters; thence North 49� 12' 32" East, 15.244 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 91.5 square meters (985 square feet). The easement herein granted shall become effective upon the execution of this document and shall terminate on September 30, 2005 or upon filing of Notice of Completion, whichever first occurs. The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.6-13832 (13832-2) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors A Date: Gorski, L.S. 4430 000200 Kt9933Iyl MUIG p 1383z_1op EXHIBIT _AT PAGE IS \ 0002 \ \ Associated Enghseers, Inc. SHEET 1 -OF E SCALED It800 • 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1962 FANG (909) 94-0891 AREA PARCEL No.. 13832-2 �■� %IMRE FEU* 985 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE ON THE CAUFORMA COORDINATE SYSTEM 01 30 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY L0 TC TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13832-2 S lhifeiQY I �h� EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 14, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, excepting therefrom the southwesterly 2.00 feet thereof [0.610 meters] as described in an Interspousal Transfer Grant Deed to Larry Payne, recorded August 25, 1998, as Instrument 356399, of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 14, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot, South 47° 34' 40" West, 14.627 meters to the most southerly comer of said land described in an Interspousal Transfer Grant Deed to Larry Payne, said most southerly comer being the most easterly comer of land described in a Grant Deed to Manh Van Luong, et.ux., recorded July. 13, 1998, as Instrument 287147, of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along the southwesterly line of said land granted to Larry Payne and the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Manh Van Luong, et.ux., North 42° 38' 18" West, 14.957 meters; thence North 47° 08' 09" East, 14.629 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot, said point being distant northwesterly thereon, North 42° 37' 48' West, 15.070 meters from said most easterly comer; thence southeasterly along said northeasterly line, South 42° 37' 48" East, 15.070 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 219.6 square meters (2,364 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the Califomia Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.7-13835 (13835-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. Signatur biorski, .S - 30 9/30/01 Date: NO. 4436 E. 09/30101 • 000202 FYI4iRiT A PAGE 11 \ • ♦ ♦ \ • \ \ ♦ • • • RI NEHART ' S SI VD J TRACT MB )6/9 \♦ \ ♦ • ♦ • \ \ ♦ • ♦ 10 • ♦ ♦ 11 0203 ♦ \ \ 12 • ♦ ♦ ♦ N. \ 13 \ \ ♦ • \ r ♦ • • • • \ ♦ • • • hp +may ,`A • 1 A •<(' • • \ • • • • • • 17 • \ • SCALE: 1:500 • • • • • • • 16 ♦ • \ • • • 91 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 6. MULTIPLY STANCES SHOWN TO OBTAIN GROOUNDaLEVEL DISTANCES.BY L 92 kik Assodated Engineers, Incl. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. 49091980-4'982 FA% 49091941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST PARCEL No.: 13835-1 SOUARE FEET: 2364 PARCEL 13835-1. SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY PIAORILT DDSCRIDMIPO Exhibit "A" Fee THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 90 OF RINEHARTS BOULEVARD TRACT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 16, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. (APN 342-052-018) CTPN: 13836-1 EXHIBIT A PAGE. /6.46 342 — C5 7. R, A. 67/4 ° 03 64.8 P OR NW//4, SEC. /, r5S. , R. 4W Q QP64, Q Q 0348t1 Q34,k! 0344! 4 3b 5 Se' COUNTY a34,k 1 7 ✓ A: "8" G'( a34oct aJ44 // 2 ,(2 l3 48 Se /3 a anti 1034 41 7m 71 068 Ati SX I,t'' • / 9.AS' Sr 12 Si Al, .42. • // / / O9 '15 411. 1b t /of4 RCSw Kai 0 ail .d°4 R7 4 Kti; B9 y 5194 97 S O 95A 9+; SY 4 92 A S' +I sn e9, as APoe a ask!. Q a 4464 0 a344.8 tit . Wool-o3�4t 0. Q (2 3441 Q n3�rt Q a34ae: Q (2344.8 Q a34aet // a3a:t a t�6ex1 s 2 3f4.8 aH Q °344 .8 a 1:1 4k4e3,r Q - B Q@ Si1g.1 (23/4t 030,41 Rfl4/)3 R.S. /4/73 Rinehart's Boule vard rice/ MB /6/9 MAR QY /972 ASSESSX'S MAP at 342 PG, 05 R/VE RS/DE Ca o/TY, CALF • " " Exhibit "A" Fee THE LAND IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 89 OF RINEHARTS BOULEVARD TRACT AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 16, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (342-052-019) CTPN: 13837-1 000206 EXHIBIT A PAGE Al C) CLt /6-46 342 - 05 0A ft .4. 9! 04.01 jl . aM.N 141.11 011.1 1. M f 4/.) OS* '3)4 13 1, / T,R,A, 97/4 PDR. NW//4, SEC. /, T.5S., R.4W /// //Kk /09 a� i 03194&.4034,,e 1 0354:.4 . 0.39kt /99.1 .9 STA TE X4. 19' couNTY r /M n/ Mo o: A. • `236 k1 2 2 // 2 a3441 a3i4e! 11 s4e..4 a364w 9 4. ro p // 4 @ !3 A• Ham' !WAY 4 4 74 C i5 1 riP , Pot Ai 1 KV I Q cl o 1:1_ 1L ® ® ® a c /l a aclaso Qy 4 0.54 4,.4 0342 4.2 a lil�l a. 44 a ll L28 1ct• a34,ki 0.546::: 0344:f am** 4.5441 a34ht 03442 03 ,kt 0344:! 0344:.* 068,:! 1 codas . w. 4s' . • �. 114/P3 ,$. /4/73 Rineho-/'s Baikrord MB /6/9 MARCH /972 • ASSES324'S MAP at 342 PC, 05 R/VERS/0E QXNTY, CAL M' • EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 26 and 27, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 27, said corner being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 27, North 42° 31' 12" West, 12.787 meters; thence South 48° 23' 22" West, 30.481 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 26, said point being distant thereon, North 42° 32' 13" West, 13.219 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot 26; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 42° 32' 13" East, 13.219 meters to said most southerly comer, said most southerly corner being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lots, North 47° 34' 40" East, 30.473 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 396.3 square meters (4,266 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.8-13852 (13852-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Lan Surveyors Ac Signature: Date: 000208 •A M EXHIBIT A.. PAGE R3 , SHEET 1 OF 1 LOT 28 r9J NEHAR r' S 4, aOUL,EVARD J rRAC r `''i. M.'S., lb/c9 EXIST \ QF 'ewe R/W \ �,F, r \ a LOT 26 \\ �• � E'LY COR �� \ OF LOT 27 �Q� d'*- • I'' (14 \ c' (o), 3852- �` +Q P� II S'LY COR OF LOT 26 Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91164 TEL. (9091980-1982 FAX (909) 941-0991 AREA PARCEL Nos 13852-1 SQUARE FEET; 4266 SQUARE METTERS, 396.3 • THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983.. ZONE NLCROLJN DISTANCES DS SHOWN BY 1. 0*.... TO OBTAIN GROINID LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13852-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY �I�1T�I�s�Ngli. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 14 33.6/40.2 " EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being those portions of Lots 30 and 31, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly corner of said Lot 31, said corner being on the northwesterly tine of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence northwesterly along the northeasterly line of said Lot 31, North 42� 29' 56" West, 9.980 meters; thence South 55� 02' 15" West, 16.782 meters; thence South 48� 23' 22" West, 13.850 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 30, said southwesterly line being the northeasterly line of Edward Street (50.00 feet wide) [15.240 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, said point being distant thereon, North 42� 30' 42" West, 12.355 meters from the most southerly corner of said Lot 30; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line and said last mentioned northeasterly line, South 42� 30' 42" East,12.355 meters to said most southerly corner, said most southerly corner being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lots, North 47� 34' 40" East, 30.482 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 353.9 square meters (3,809 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74 and Edward Street). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-39.8-13854 (13854-1) This real property description. has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act Signature: Date: Expire , L.S. 4430 0002.E 0 PL I=YI-1IRIT A PIMP ac NETT LINE OF LOT 31 LOT 32 NEIY LINE OF EDWARD STREET PER M.B. 16/9 • \ • \ • • \ \ LOT 31 R 1 NEHART ' S fOU r VARD "TRACT JVJ ., J 16/9 LOT 30 SWLY LINE Of LOT 30 OF 42. r CJs Q� / \, ;% +`yam / 1 Q k. ./ \..% z S'LY COR / Sj� i� OF LOT 30 \t /' ,�/,� Q` ELk 1 ham Z55 O EXIST R/W 9 OE / i Associated Engineers, Inc. 331 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1962 FAX: (9091941-0891 / AREA 1 z' Sc. EXIST R/W \♦ • J THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ZONEHE 6. CALIFORNIAMULTIPLY COORDINATE DISTANCES SHOWNEM BY 1. 47 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE 08 RIVERSDE • 14 KILOPOST PARCEL No.: 13854-1 SOUARE FEET: 3809 SOUARE METERS: 353.9 PARCEL 13854-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY 33.6/402 EXHIBIT "A" Fee Being a portion of Lot 36, as shown on the Rinehart's Boulevard Tract, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 9 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most easterly comer of said Lot, said comer being on the northwesterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Rinehart's Boulevard Tract; thence South 55° 02' 15" West, 15.374 meters to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot, saidpoint being distant thereon, North 42° 30' 05" West, 1.996 meters from the most southerly comer of said Lot; thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line, South 42° 30' 05" East, 1.996 meters to said most southerly comer, said most southerly comer being on said northwesterly line; thence northeasterly along said northwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Lot, North 47° 34' 40" East, 15.241 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 15.2 square meters (164 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property'in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-40.0-13858 (13858-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 000 12 WASSOCImpdilee69138WAPPINGIDEEDSW091doc I YI4IRIT A PAGE11... *Y SHEET 1 OF 1 ¥S SCALE. N 800 � � 3b \ • oT_ \ Ac 0� 3\ \ \ 00021 \ \ �$Z-7. a. '311 \ \ wo. t4 \ \ • A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ bOs \ \ \ \ \\ \ Ao \\ \ ` \ \ ` \ \ \ �� \ ,\ \\ \ Q- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �, \ \ \ �1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ AR \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED 4, ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0070 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 338 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO, CA 91764 TEL. 1909) 980-1982 FAXs 1909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No., . 13858-1 SQUARE FEET, 164 SQUARE METERS, 15.2 PARCEL 13858-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PYH IR1T A PACE Sc EXHIBIT "B" HIGHWAY 74 CONDEMNATION PARCELS NOVEMBER 13, 2002 UNECONOMIC REMNANT PARCELS PORTION REQUIRED FOR PROJECT CPN APN ACTIVITY OWNER 13629-1 349-342-007 Fee Martha Louise Phillips, Trustee 13630=1 349-342-006 Fee Martha Louise Phillips, Trustee 13780-1 342-200-032 Fee Louis J. Mercado • • 13802-1 342-140-010 Fee Marian Ellen Frederick. 342-140-011 342-140-012 000214 " " EXHIBIT "B". Being a portion of Lot 8 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northwesterly corner of said Lot 8, said corner being on the southeasterly line of State Route 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said map; thence easterly along the northerly line of said Lot 8, South 89�19'51" East, 14.859 meters; thence South 20�08'36" West, 22.730 meters to a point of intersection with the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 50 as shown on said map, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89�24'12" East, 15.084 meters from the point of intersection with said southeasterly line of State Route 74; thence westerly along said westerly prolongation, North 89�24'12" West, 15.084 meters to said last mentioned point of intersection; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot 8, North 20�39'38" East, 22.824 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing approximately 320.9 square meters (3454 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-33.7-13629 (13629-1) This real property description has been prepard by me, or under my direction, in conformance with " Professi La ury Signatu Date: "nom JOHN IMBI " RSKI, L.S. 4430 LI NSE EXPIRES 9/30/01 NANO " ���� fc spHN S p�� NO. 4430 Exp. 09/30/01 �F floi.. :15 M:199138\MMPINGIDEEDS\13629.DOC SCALEI Is500 LOT 176 0 N89'2412"W —15.084m- POB NW'LY COR OF LOT 8 589' 19.51"E 14.859 m E ij e LOT 8 CO 0 LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 10 LOT 11 / Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 LOT 49 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL Nos 13629-1 SQUARE FEET: 3454 SQUARE METERS' 320.9 LOT 6 LOT 41i LOT 51 W'LY PROLONGATION OF NI.Y LINE OF LOT 50 LOT 50 • PROGRESSIVE SU8D1 VLSI DN MS 16/56 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.035 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. PARCEL 13629-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION " EXHIBIT "B" Being a portion of Lot 7 as shown on the Progressive Subdivision Map, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 16, Page 56 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 7, said southwesterly corner being on the southeasterly line of State Route 74, formerly known as County Highway, (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters], as shown on said map; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly line and the northwesterly line of said Lot 7, North 20�39'38" East, 19.342 meters to a point of intersection with the westerly prolongation of the northerly line of Lot 51 as shown on said map; thence easterly along said westerly prolongation, South 89�24'27" East, 14.680 meters; thence South 20�08'36" West, 19.300 meters to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 7, said point being distant easterly thereon, South 89�19'51" East, 14.859 meters from the southwesterly corner of said Lot 7; thence westerly along said southerly line, North 89�19'51" West, 14.859 meters to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 268.5 square meters (2890 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74) The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00010335 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-33.7-13630 (13630-1) This real property description conformance :.iti' e P Signature Date: been prepa '.y/ -'e, or under my direction, in IMB " " , S. 4430 SE EXPIRES 9/30/01 000217 M:\991364 APPtNG\J EEDS\13630.DOC SCALE: I:500 LOT 176 '30' 589'24'27"E 14.680 m q 630-t N89' 19'SI"W 14.859 m POB SW'LY COR OF LOT T LOT 9 LOT 10 LOT 10 LOT 11 / / LOT 50 LOT 49 W'LY PROLONGATION OF N'LY LINE OF LOT 5I PROGRESSIVE SUaD1 V1 S1 nN M9 16/56 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF Ino2 ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY 1.0 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL. (909) 980-1982 FAX! (909) 941-0891 AREA DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KLOPOST 08 RIVERSIDE 74 33.6/40.2 PARCEL No.: 13630-1 SQUARE FEET: 2890 SQUARE MEItxs: 268.5 PARCEL 13630-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "B" Being those portions of Lots 20 and 21, as shown on the Map of Good Hope Acres, Addition No. 1, situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, filed in Book 11, Page 87 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, as described in a Grant Deed to Louis J. Mercado, recorded August 23, 1984, as Instrument 184671 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly corner of said Lot 21, said point being on the southeasterly line of State Highway 74, formerly known as County Highway (60.00 feet wide) [18.288 meters] as shown on said Map of Good Hope Acres; thence southeasterly along the southwesterly line of said Lot 21, South 27° 43' 48" East, 14.430 meters; thence North 57° 23' 18" East, 36.408 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Joe Eddie Birdo, et. al., recorded February 16, 1996, as Instrument 57928 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder, said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Louis J. Mercado, said point being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 57° 23' 18" East, 28.430 meters to a point on the northeasterly line of said land described in a Grant Deed to Louis J. Mercado, said northeasterly line being the southwesterly line of land described in a Grant Deed to The Abiding Love Ministry and Outreach, recorded April 12, 1993, as Instrument 133338 of Official Records in said Office of the County Recorder; thence northwesterly along said last mentioned northeasterly and southwesterly line, North 36° 16' 57" West, 13.245 meters to a point on said southeasterly line, said point being on a non -tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 591.287 meters, a radial line through said point bears South 34° 35' 43" East; thence southwesterly along said southeasterly line, the northwesterly line of said Lots 20 and 21 and said curve through a central angle of 02° 46' 34" an arc length of 28.649 meters to the most westerly corner of said land described in a Grant Deed to Louis J. Mercado; thence southeasterly along said first mentioned northeasterly and southwesterly line, South 37° 18' 53" East, 12.964 meters to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing approximately 369.7 square meters (3,980 square feet). TOGETHER with fee interest, if any, appurtenant to the above -described property in and to the adjoining public way (State Highway 74). The bearings and distances used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System of 1983, Zone 6. Multiply distances shown by 1.00002470 to obtain ground level distances. 08-RIV-74-38.5-13780 (13780-1) This real property description has been prepared by me, or under my direction, in conformance with e Professions and rveyor • ct k_rt1v�'\ �pHN btfoti9 Date: M:\97138\MAPPING\DEEDS\13780.000 Y 0=02' 46'34" R.591.287m L=28.649m SW'LY LINE OF LOT 21 TPOB (' 9 21 ��zf \. NE'LY LINE OF LANG GRANTED TO JOE EDDIE B1RD0. ET. AL.. AS INST NO 57928 O.R., REC 2-16-1996 POC W'LY COR LOT 21 G000 HOPE ACRES, ADDITION NO.1. M.B. 11/87 00220 SW'LY LINE OF LAND GRANTED TO THE ABIDING LOVE MINISTRY AND OUTREACH, AS INST NO. 133338 O.R., REC. 4-12-1993 \ NE'LY LINE OF LANG \\ GRANTED TO LOUIS J. MERCADO AS INST NO. 1846710.R., REC 8-23-1984 SW'LY LINE OF L AND 0 GRANTED TO LOUIS J. $ MERCADO AS INST NO. 1846710.R., REC 8-23-1984 2' vi• `\I 10 �J ' THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983. ZONE 6. MULTIPLY DISTANCES SHOWN BY .I.000. TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES. Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 EAST SHELBY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 TEL:. b9091,900-1982 FAX: (909) 941-0891 AREA PARCEL No.: 13780-1 SOUARE FEET: 3980 SQUARE METERS: 369.7 PARCEL 13780-1 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DISTRICT nv COUNTY rnvrPcmF ROUTE 74 KILOPOST t� mien.? " AGENDA ITEM 7A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Louie Martin, Bechtel Project Controls Manager Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Contracts Cost and Schedule Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending September 30, 2002. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached material depicts the current cost and schedule status on contracts reported by projects, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending September 30, 2002. Attachment: Monthly Report — September 2002 Item 7A 000223 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ROUTE 60 PROJECTS Final Design HOV 60/215 to Redlands Blvd. (2042) (3000) TALMO ROUTE 74 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ/ROW (R02041 9954,9966, (R02142) (R02141) (2140) (3001) (3009) ROUTE 79 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ. /ROW (3003) Realignment study & Right turn lanes (R09961) ROUTE 86 PROJECTS Avenue 58 to Avenue 66 (Segment 2) * ROUTE 91 PROJECTS Soundwall/Aux lane design, ROW and construction (R09101,9337,9847,9861,9848,9832,9969,2043) (2058) (2144) (2136) (3600, 3602) Van Buren Blvd, Frwy Hook Ramp (R03008) Mary Street to 7th Street HOV design & ROW(3005) Sndwall Landscaping (R09933,9946,2059.3601) ROUTE 111 PROJECTS (R09219, 9227,9234,9523,9525,9530,9537,9538) 9540,9635,9743,9849-9851,9857,9629 (3400-3405) RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHW AY/PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE COMMISSION CONTRACTURAL % COM MITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES AUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 09/30/02 TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE $3,900,000 $69,847,655 $1,125,000 $20,253,000 $33,860,000 $11,902,100 $2,954,000 $1,274,430 $1,603,450 $16,946,856 $3,829,862 ��t829�€6 $29,514,368 $799,438 $19,500,000 $33,760,000 $10,374,324 98.2% $6,470 42.3% $466,462 71.1% $14,864 96.3% Project Complete 99 .7 % Project Complete 87.2% $2,954,000 100 .0% $1,062,025 $1,603,450 $15,530,856 83.3% 91.6% $0 $0 $39,842 $11,427 $0 $3,029,816 $9,659,353 $766,452 $18,060,000 $31,013,510 $9,512,470 $2,109,519 $112,699 $831,847 $14,944,529 79.1% 32 .7 % 95,9% 92.6% 91.9 % 91 .7% 71.4% 10.6 % 51 .9% 96.2 % Page 1 of 3 000224 RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION COMMISSION CONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES AUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 09/30/02 TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE 1-215 PROJECTS Preliminary Engrg/Environ. (R09008, 9018) 5 $6,726,504 $5,878,173 87 .4 % $400,000 $5,704,897 97.1% INTERCHANGE IMPROV. PROGRA M Yuma IC Landscaping (R09926,9946) PROJECT & CONSTR. MGMT SERV. (Agreement (02-31-081)) PROGRAM PLAN & SERVICES North/South Corridor study (R09936) PARK-N-RIDE/INCENT. PROGRAM (RO 9859) (2101-2117) (9813) (2146) (9917) 2126 2127,2138,2139 COMMUTER RAIL Studies/Engineering/Construction (RO 9731,9832,9833,9956,2028) 2031,2027,2120 R02029,2128, 3800 - 3811,3813, 3814) Station/Site Acq/OP Costs/Maint. Costs (0000,2026,2056,4000-4007,4198,4199,4009,3812 $440,000 $2,138,641 $25,000 $2,323,177 $16,818,070 $13,900,329 $2,027,483 $25,000 $2,323,177 $16,425,518 $13,900,329 90 .9% 94 .8% 100.0% 100.0% $0 $312,519 $103,060 $398,777 $0 $0 $31,073 $563,606 97.7% $2,116,769 $9,260,394 100. 0% $1,456,486 $7,143,625 78.1% 19.7% 0.0% 24.3% 56.4% 51.4% Page 2 of 3 •0225 PROJECT DESCRIPTION RCTC ME ASURE "A" HIGHWAY/LOCAWEETS & ROADS PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY PROJECT APPROVED COMMITMENT EXPENDITURE FOR MONTH ENDED 09/30/02 TOTAL MEASURE "A " ADVANCES OUTSTANDING LOAN BALANCE OUTSTANDING COMMITMENT % LOAN BALANCE TO -DATE AG AINST APPROVED COM MIT. CITY OF CANYON LAKE Railroad Canyon Rd Improvements CITY OF CORONA Smith, Maple & Lincoln Interchanges & (1) Storm drainage structure CITY OF PERRIS Local streets & road improvements CITY OF SAN JACINTO Local streets & road improvements CITY OF TEMECULA Local streets & road improvements CITY OF NORCO Yuma I/C & Local streets and road Imprmts CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Local streets & road improvements CITY OF HEMET Local streets & roads improvements $1,600,000 $5,212,623 $1,936,419 $1,324,500 $5,094,027 $2,139,067 $1,500,000 $730,000 $1,600,000 $5,212,623 $703,456 $2,960,329 $1,936,419 $1,206,394 $1,324,500 $825,166 $5,094,027 $3,173,591 $2,139,067 $1,332,644 $1,500,000 $856,875 $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 44.0 % 56.8% 62 .3% 62.3 % 62 .3% 62 .3% 57 .1% 0.0% NOTE: (1) Loan against interchange improvement programs. All values are for total Project/Contract and not related to fiscal year budgets. Status as of: 09/30/02 Page 3 of 3 000226 AGENDA ITEM 7B • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Single Signature Authority Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the months ending July, August, and September 2002. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • • The attached report details all contracts that have been executed through the months of July, August and September 2002, under the Single Signature Authority granted to the Executive Director by the Commission. The remaining unused capacity is $443,855.00. Attachment: Single Signature Authority Report as of September 30, 2002 Item 7B - 000227 " CONSULTANT AMOUNT AVAILABLE July 1, 2002 0.00 0.00 0 .00 AMOUNT USED SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORIj�� AS OF SEPTEMBER30, 2002 - DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ars, epa ers t sr oWMo srn A MOUNT REMAINING THROUGH June 30, 2003 Donna Po lmounter Prepare d by i+i��itias��ettai f:\users\preprint\dp\s i nsig03 resell :ra Michele Cisneros Re viewed by xt��rx��;b,Erry UKICi1NAL CONTRACT AMOUNT 500,000 .00 EXPENDED AMOUNT KtIVIAININLi" CONTRACT AMOUNT 0.00 0 .00 0.00 56,145.00 17,477 .54 38,667 .46 $ 443,855.00 $ 17,477.54 $ 426,377.46 000228 AGENDA ITEM 7C • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ending September 30, 2002. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • • During the first three months of the fiscal year, staff has monitored the revenues and expenditures of the Commission. The first quarter of the year is primarily directed toward completing end of the year activities. Staff expects most of the categories to present a better outlook by the end of the second and beginning of the third quarters. At the end of the quarter, the Sales Tax revenues were 3.165% higher than the same period for last fiscal year. At this point, it is too early to project the significance over the entire year; however, it is a promising start to the fiscal year. Even though the Federal and State economies are in a slow down, due to the economic diversity of Riverside County staff believes that the County will continue to have moderate growth. At mid year, staff will evaluate Sales Tax revenues and make appropriate adjustments as it brings forth the mid -year revenue adjustment. Federal, State and Local Government reimbursements and Other revenues are on a reimbursement basis and the Commission will receive these revenues as the projects are completed and billed. Most of the expenditure categories are right where they should be for the quarter or below targets. The only exception is the Professional Services and Administrative Service due to costs incurred for consultants and postage for the public information mailers. Staff will continue to monitor this category and make adjustments as necessary. All other categories are within normal parameters. Rail Operations and Maintenance are above quarterly increments due to additional maintenance that was performed. Intergovernmental Distributions are higher than due to the one-time LTF Administration payments made to CVAG and WRCOG. Item 7C 000229 Staff will continue to monitor the revenues and expenditures and notify the Commission of any unusual events. Construction costs are within appropriation limits at the end of 1St quarter. Staff will continue to monitor the costs and will bring forth to the Commission any unusual events. Attachment: Quarterly Financial Statements - September 2002 000230 Om 7C • " 10/14/2002 RIVERSSCUNTY TRANSPORTATION C OM MISSION QBAF1 ARTERLY ACTUAL BY FUND 1ST QUARTER FOR PERIOD ENDING 9/30/02 DESCRIPTION REVENUES Sales Tax Federal St ate & Local Gov't Other Revenues Interest Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Administration Salaries & Benefits General Legal Services Professional Services Office Lease & Utilities General Administrative Expense Total Administration Programs/Protects Salaries & Benefits General Legal Services Professional Services General Projects Highway Engineering Highway Construction Highway ROW Rail Engineering Rail Construction Rail ROW Local Street and Roads Regional Arterial Special Studies FSP Towing Commuter Assistance Property Management M otorist Assistance Rail Oper atio ns & M aintenance STA Distributions Specialized Transit Planning & Programming Svcs Total Programs/Projects Intergovem Distribution Capital Outlay Debt Service Principal Interest Total Debt Service Total Expenditures Other Financing Sources/Uses Operating Transfer In Operating Transfer Out Total Financing Sources/Uses Excess(Deficiency)of Revenues and other financing sources o ver (under) expenditure and other financing uses Fund Balance July 1, 2002 PALO GENERAL WESTERN VERDE FUND FSP/SAFE COUNTY VALLEY STATE WESTERN CO ACHELLA TRANSIT COUNTY DEBT VALLEY ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION SERVICE COMBINED TOTAL $4,144,393 $ - $13,355,498 $165,624 $ 4,690,532 $ - $ - $ - $ 22,356,047 534 117,343 343,285 - - - - 461,161 152,557 433 341,734 - - " 494,725 - 14,829 190,628 11,863 517,179 170,601 905,100 4,297,483 132,606 14,231,145 165,624 4,690,532 11,863 517,179 170,601 24,217,033 216,237 8,954 476,075 64,017 207,630 972,913 49,790 13,181 572 18,667 4,086 13,285 155,628 24,566 43,288 27,457 20,307 808 4,038 176,820 5,691 - 110,358 1,886,020 61,473 54,923 61,320 118,882 776,396 204,034 755,096 33,320 2,725,128 6,038 6,714,519 88,554 108,137 208,413 893 1,608 3,013 2,069,675 3,378,563- 31 2,038,569 258,202 747,000 3,408 - 2,146,057 312,331 11,966,022 208,413 6,200,753 2,038,599 594,316 - - 11,180 714 (317) 229,418 9,525 494,741 68,103 220,915 1,022,703 238,302 80,297 108,677 120,490 779,409 204,034 755,096 33,320 2,725,128 6,038 8,992,607 3,378,563 116,011 176,820 108,137 5,691 110,358 1,886,020 2,038,569 1,005,202 3,408 22,872,176 594,316 11,577 64,418 64,418 4,104 4,104 68,522 68,522 3,724,467 362,835 11,965,705 208,413 6,200,753 2,038,599 68,522 24,569,294 1,615,879 240,600 2,806,155 5,066,120 " 19,106,637 28,924,609 2,204,179 240,600 8,181,315 7,040,373 11,168,898 - 28,924,609 588,300 - 5,375,160 1,974,253 11,168,898 (19,106,637) (15,283) (230,229) (3,109,720) (42,789) (3,484,474) (2,026,736) (10,651,718) 19,208,716 (352,261) 6,925,783 2,953,755 59,599,583 89,499 5,778,519 4,560,529 45,913,788 38,179,974 164,001,457 Fund Balance Sept 30, 2002 $6,910,500 $2,723,526 $56,489,863 $ 46,710 $ 2,294,045 $ 2,533,793 $ 35,262,070 $57,388,690 $ 163,649,196 " 000231 f r r,pinUmc/ quartMMN Np12002 " AGENDA ITEM 7D " " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Cost Allocation Plan Summary. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Federal and State agencies allow local governments to recover direct costs of a project and also allow the local governments to recover indirect costs based upon an approved CAP. Since the Commission has several projects that are funded by Federal and State funds, staff hired a consultant, Revenue and Costs Specialists, LLC, to prepare a CAP for the Commission. Staff intends to submit this to the Federal and State agencies for approval. This will allow the Commission to recover indirect costs currently funded by Measure "A". Revenue and Cost Specialist, LLC have prepared an indirect cost rate for the administrative overhead, the Western County Highway, the Rail Program, and the Coachella Valley Highway program. Attached is a report prepared by Revenue and Cost Specialists, LLC, outlining the components of the plan and the rates. Attachment: Cost Allocation Plan Summary Item 7D 000232 " " " Cost Allocation Plan Summary The Riverside County Transportation Commission hired Revenue & Cost Specialists to perform a Cost Allocation Plan to fully allocate its overhead costs to its line departments and programs. This will allow the Commission to recover all of the administrative costs possible from State and Federal grants and also to fairly represent its total direct and indirect program costs. Why a Cost Allocation Plan? During the 1960's when the federal government was sharing increasing amounts of revenue with local governments, the local concern was that the grants were impacting administrative departments without the grant compensating the local agency for this impact. Consequently, the federal government established a process that local agencies could use to compute this impact and which the federal government would accept for overhead reimbursement. This process was called a Cost Allocation Plan and is identified with the various reference numbers that it has received over the years: A-87, OASC-10 and FMC 74-4. But as only the Federal Government seems able to do, the process that was created details what costs it considers to be allowable and what it considers to be unallowable. Therefore, certain costs, such as legislative costs and cash management costs, are not allowable under the federal grant recovery guidelines. But, of course, the commission is still incurring those costs. So we have created a separate Total Cost Allocation Plan which includes all administrative costs allocated to the line programs. Another difference between the A-87 Cost Plan and the Total Cost Plan is that the A- 87 Cost Plan includes actual expenditures from 2000-2001, as this is what the federal guidelines require. The Total Cost Plan includes 2002-2003 budget expenditures, because those are the most current expenditures available. Overhead Rates for each Department One of the results of the Cost Allocation process is an overhead rate for each department, and like the components discussed above, there are A-87 allowable rates and Total Cost rates. The important thing to remember when discussing overhead rates is what costs they are applied against. Some rates are applied against Salaries and Benefits and some are applied against Total Expenditures. Item 7D 000233 A-87 Rate The State Department of Transportation, in its guidelines, requires that the overhead costs be applied against the program salaries and benefits. Therefore we have developed an indirect cost rate of 164.83% of the direct program salaries and benefits. The calculation is detailed below: FY 2001 Actual Indirect Costs $2,218,305 FY 2001 Actual Direct Salaries $1,345,831 and Wages plus Fringe Benefits FY 2001 Indirect Cost Rate 164.83% In addition, we developed a program administration rate for three programs. This overhead rate is meant to cover the Bechtel project management costs, and as they are managing capital programs and not salaries, an overhead rate was developed as a percentage of the direct program costs. They are detailed below: Program Indirect Costs Direct Costs Cost Rate Western County Highways $202,336 $7,823,733 2.59% Eastern County Highways $200,533 $1,645,387 12.19% Rail Capital $218,851 $1,806,813 12.11% The Commission must now get these rates approved by the State Department of Transportation to be able to apply the rates to its federal and state funded programs. Total Rate For the Total Cost Plan we developed rates for each department based on the itemized level of support it received from the administrative departments, as detailed in the complete report. As the RCTC is a capital intensive organization with relatively low levels of full time staff, it made more sense to develop overhead rates as a percentage of budget costs for that department. A detailed schedule is available through the Commission. If you would like a copy, please contact Ivan M. Chand at (909) 787- 7926. These are the rates that should be charged against other departments so that the true costs of the various programs that the Commission is providing can be identified. It is then up to the Commission whether or not the indirect costs are identified and matched up with the direct costs of each program in the Commission's budget document. Item 7D • 000234 " AGENDA ITEM 7E " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution No. 03-013, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Annual Appropriation Limit" BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 03-013, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Commission's Annual Appropriation Limit". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Section 910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriation limit for each fiscal year and to make documentation used to determining the appropriations limit available to the public fifteen days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit. Counsel has performed the calculations necessary to determine the limit. Attached are the Resolution No. 03-013 and the attachments showing the calculations. The Commission chose to use the percentage change in the California per capital personal income and the population change within Riverside County as the factors in determining the appropriation limit. Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution 03-013 to establish an annual appropriations limit. Attachment: Resolution No. 03-013 • Item 7E 000235 " " " RESOLUTION NO. 03-013 "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT" WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution places an annual limitation upon appropriations from proceeds of taxes by each local government of the State of California; and WHEREAS, in 1988, pursuant to Article XIIIB, section 4 of the California Constitution, the Riverside County Transportation Commission established its appropriations limit at $75 million for fiscal year 1988-1989 under Ordinance No. 88-1; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriations limit for each fiscal year and to make the documentation used in determining the appropriations limit available to the public fifteen days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 1 approved by the voters of the State effective June 6, 1990, beginning with fiscal year 1990-1991 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Commission's Board of Directors is required to select either the percentage change in California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll due to the addition of local non-residential construction, and either the population change within the Commission or the population change within Riverside County, as the two factors to be applied in calculating the appropriations limit for each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this Board wishes to select, as factors in determining the Commission's appropriations limits for fiscal year 1990-1991 through 2002-2003, the percentage change in California per capita personal income and also the population change within Riverside County; and OOO23 WHEREAS, this Commission has documented its calculations of the Commission's appropriations limit for fiscal years 1989-1990 through 2002-2003, and said calculations have been made available to the public at least fifteen days prior to the adoption of this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Riverside County Transportation Commission as follows: 1. For fiscal years 1990-1991 through 2002-2003, the factors selected for calculating the appropriations limit are (a) the percentage change in California per capita personal income, and (b) the population change within the County of Riverside. 2. The appropriations limit applicable to this Agency pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for fiscal years 1989-1990 through 2002-2003 are hereby established and determined to be in the following sums: 1989-1990 $84,517,535 1990-1991 $95,438,854 1991-1992 $106,297,629 1992-1993 $110,623,585 1993-1994 $117,825,588 1994-1995 $121,699,901 1995-1996 $128,556,376 1996-1997 $137,130,054 1997-1998 $143,806,742 1998-1999 $154,163,121 1999-2000 $164,836,970 2000-2001 $177,789,811 2001-2002 $198,076,351 2002-2003 $203,148,539 3. A copy of the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for fiscal years 1989-1990 through 2002-2003 shall be affixed hereto and shall be available for public inspection. • • • -2- 000237 " " " 4. Pursuant to Section 7910 of the California Government Code, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the establishment of the appropriations limits as set forth herein must be commenced within forty-five days of the adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED this 13th day of November, 2002. John F. Tavaglione, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission -3- 000238 " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1989-1990 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1988-1989 Appropriations Limit $75,000,000 1 Change in Californiaper capita income 9 P fin , Change n:Population Riverside Count.; 1.051`9 ?C 1.0 3 1126900470 . ... .... . .. . . ... . . _... . .... .. ...... .... . ..... . .. .. .. .. .. ......... .. . ... . . . . .. 7 (C[}' :1 > '690?47 ... . .. . . . . :::percent' . . . . . .. . . ..... .... . . ........ ... . ... :: .. ._... :. . ercent 4,517, 1989-1990 Appropriations Limit $84,517,535 -4- OOO23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1990-1991 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1989-1990 Appropriations Limit $84,517,535 1990-1991 adjustrn nt .. .. . .... . .. ........ ..... . ... .. ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .. ..... ..... .. ... . . .... ..... ... ....... .. .. ...... .. .. . .. .. . . C an a eal�farnra a -cap- ; han a `'r 'n ulation Ri ere n: county 9 p Y . ;1;0421 ii292. 195 292'195: 3.:38': `aerent 54'' 1990-1991 Appropriations Limit $95,438,854 • • • -5- 000240 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1991-1992 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1990-1991 Appropriations Limit $95,438,854 199 9 ' adjustni nt Change in California per capita income Change in Population, Riverside County 111.0:41-41 ,1::.p5 ; 95 ` 1 1 1:3'777 5438,i854)( 1991-1992 Appropriations Limit -6- 5. pe :cent $106,297,629 000241 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1992-1993 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1991-1992 Appropriations Limit $ 106,297,629 '1;992-19' ° djustmnt . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. ..... .. . . .. . Cal'forr is er a lnl rr lat onE. I i ers e ur t 9 p. 297'29 '1 0 6. :: areryt' 474;' ` ercent p 1992-1993 Appropriations Limit $110,623,585 • • • -7- 000242 " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1993-1994 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1992-1993 Appropriations Limit $110,623,585 1993=1;99 adjustor r t ;.>Changen. California per capa incOrne. Ch ::: . . .. . .. anger Ppulato er rt 1.0272 X 1.03 9 1 065108 80 -58:5 1 0 ;1 6 .. .. .. .... ercen .9 P r �� cent.:� 1993-1994 Appropriations Limit $117,825,588 -8- - 000243 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION _ 1994-1995 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1993-1994 Appropriations Limit $117,825,588 1 9..... . ... ........ ....... ............................ . ........ . . . . ... ............ . . . ........ . 94= ' adj i e t n ; a i orm er ca its: nccme- percen ange in Population, Riverside Count :;::: = i percent 1994-1995 Appropriations Limit $121,699,901 • • -9- 000244 " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1995-1996 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1994-1995 Appropriations Limit $121,699,901 arig <ir ; aifo n a. er ca Ita: ini cime- Rivers . county 69:%9 . 1995-1996 Appropriations Limit -10- orcent 2; percent ; $128,556,376 000245 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1996-1997 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1995-1996 Appropriations Limit $128,556,376 .. ... .. ..... ......... . ... .. .. ... . .. . . . .. . .. . ... ... ... .................... ...... . .. .... . ......... .... . ... .... .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .... .. ... ............. ...... ..: ..... ............ . ....: 1°99 ;- 9'7 aclj:ustrr; ... . ... ... . .... .. .. .. -- . Change inCalifornia per capita-. .income eht Change in o ; :Riveersi€1e- Count 1 91 ercent 1 X1467: ii,. 019't 1 a6: '9'13;; 00419701 1996-1997 Appropriations Limit $137,130,054 • • -11- 000246 " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1997-1998 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1996-1997 Appropriations Limit $137,130,054 . . ..: ::::.:. .... ... .. . . ........... .. . fin opu a,. ion RiVetSi 1:x001 ;: 0T! 1997-1998 Appropriations Limit $143,806,742 -12- _ 000247 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1998-1999 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1997-1998 Appropriations Limit $143,806,742 ... ........... .. . ......... ... .. .... . ........ ... . . . .......... .............. . . ... . ......... ............... ..... . .. .......... .... . .. ............... ............. .. 1998-1999 ajut ;ntt . . . ..... ... . . . ... . .. ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. . _. . . ... . .. . . . .. ... ..... .. . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . ... .. .. . . ..... .. .. _.. . . han ' I' al c rnra er ca i s °tnc ;me 1)6 eid rr pulat on Riversrdp ;ar r ty ... ...._. .. ...... .. .. . _..... . . .... . . .. ....... .. . :. .:: � :percent :.:. .. '� :2; 1998-1999 Appropriations Limit $154,163,121 • • -13- 000248 " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1999-2000 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1998-1999 Appropriations Limit $154,163,121 . ...... ........... .......... .. .......... ............... ....... . ....... ..... .......................... Chart. e r Cal fo niai perva tn open Chart-a:in Po l - pu_alpnriversw,QuTa ... _ ��y��z�� ::0ceen 1999-2000 Appropriations Limit -14- $ 164,836,970 000249 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2000-2001 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 1999-2000 Appropriations Limit $164,836,970 ................................... .................... ..... .. ......... . .... .. . . ...... ..._..................... . . ................. .... ... .. .. ... ... .. .. ....... . . . .. .. ... n :in Ca r o rnra er capita income e in Po ulatio -Riverside erside County ::.: .... :... :.... :..: ::::.. .. ... .._. . .... ..... . .. .. . 2000-2001 Appropriations Limit $177,789,811 • • -15- 000250 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION • • 2001-2002 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 2000-2001 Appropriations Limit $177,789,811 ................. ._.... .. . .. . __.. . .... ... ... . . .. . ..... .......... ..... .__. ... 2001-2002 adjustnieri Change in Ca i orniia err c i _ :► ra i . ... .. .. .. .... .. . . ... . . .... . . . . . ....... . . ... ..... . .. . . . . . ... ............. .. .. .. . . . . .. ............ ... .... ... .... ... .. ...... ..... Change in PopulationRiverside '' °oun y _$177,789,01 . .. . . ..... . ....... . . . . .. 2001-2002 Appropriations Limit $198,076,351 -16- 000251 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2002-2003 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT 2001-2002 Appropriations Limit $198,076,351 . ... .............. ........... ...... .. . .... ... ............ ..._.. . . . . .... .. . . ..... . . ... ........ . .. ... .. .. ... ........... .. .... ..... ......... ... .. . .. . ... ... . . ... .... . ......... . . .. ... .. . .. 2 }02 -2003 j `a tme . . .... . . . .. . . . . . ... . ....... . .. .. . .. .. Cher try: e i ornia r' 'i a' e .. ... . . . : . . .. . .. . _ . . . . . . .. . . . . ... .. . ...... .. ..... .. . ... .... . . . . .. ... . ... . .. ... ....... ................ . . .. ......... .. . ... . .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . _. . . . ...... .. ... ..... . ..... . . . . . . ..... . .. .... . . . .. .. ... . ..... . . .............. .. . . ....... . . ; Change rI .Pa ulatipn x Riverside. Coun P .. .... .. .. .. . ... . ... . .. ...... . . .. ...... . . . . .. . ... . . . .. .. . . .. .. ..... . . .. . ... ... ........ .. .. 2002-2003 Appropriations Limit $203,148,539 • • • -17- 000252 " AGENDA ITEM 7F " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric A. Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Workshop Sponsorship: California Association for Coordinated Transportation PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the sponsorship of a workshop at the Spring 2003 Conference of the California Association for Coordinated Transportation; and, 2) Allocate up to $ 1,500 in Measure "A" Specialized Transportation Funds to cover the cost of sponsoring the workshop. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The California Association for Coordinated Transportation (CaIACT) will be holding its Spring, 2003 conference at the Riverside Convention Center with the Mission Inn serving as the conference hotel. CaIACT is a statewide, non-profit organization that represents the interests of small, rural and/or specialized transportation providers throughout the state. The main objective of CaIACT is to organize effective coordination between diverse transportation service groups. The Commission has been asked to sponsor a workshop at the Spring, 2003 conference. This conference is an excellent opportunity for many of the rural and non-profit transit agencies to attend a workshop without the need for extensive travel costs. The cost of sponsoring a workshop will cover workshop materials, lunch and room charges, if any. The subject matter of the workshop will be determined as the program for the Spring 2003 conference is finalized. 000253 Item 7F With a statewide membership of approximately 300 public, non-profit and for-profit member agencies, CaIACT focuses on community transit issues, such as federal and state transit legislation, regulatory compliance, funding issues, staff training and education, the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5310 program, ADA policy implementation and marketing. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY2002-03 Amount: $ 1,500 Source of Funds: Measure Transportation "A" Specialized Budget Adjustment: Y GLA No.: 225-26-73150 Fiscal Procedures Approved: <___NTitYla,--� Date: 11/13/2002 • 0d Y2 4 " AGENDA ITEM 7G " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Status of Western Riverside Council of Governments / San Diego Association of Governments Interstate 15 Partnership Study PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Western Riverside Council of Governments / San Diego Association of Governments Interstate 15 Partnership Study. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This item is to follow up on a request to provide the Commission information on current planning efforts regarding the 1-15 Corridor to San Diego County. The California Department of Housing and Community Development awarded a grant to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). The grant money can be used to fund activities designed to encourage economic investment and job creation near available housing, and increase housing development near major employment centers. The Interregional Partnership was formed in 2001 and consists of officials representing the SANDAG, SCAG, and WRCOG including public and private sector organizations. A technical advisory committee has also been formed consisting of Caltrans, transportation agencies (e.g. RCTC), transit operators, local agencies, and private sector entities. The Partnership's goal is to identify and prioritize issues related to jobs/housing balance by recommending strategies and model approaches to address the issues and promote adoption of its recommendations into existing jurisdictional and agency plans and programs. Item 7G 000255 The grant project is expected to be complete in January 2004. The Work Plan is divided into four (4) primary areas: • Establish an ongoing relationship between agencies from the Western Riverside and San Diego regions that share a common interest in resolving many of the growth related concerns that are currently being experienced. • Develop a strong integrated information base from which sound mitigation strategies and policy recommendations can be drawn. • Develop and implement short-term land use and transportation strategies. • Develop long-term strategies and policy recommendations that wilt help shape future growth and commute patterns. Work efforts completed to date include: 1. Draft Short-term Transportation Strategies 2. Draft Jobs/Housing Imbalance Survey Report 3. Draft Existing Conditions Report The above materials are attached. A presentation was given at the Plans and Programs Committee highlighting a resident and commuter survey that was conducted under this grant project. Additional information will be provided at the December Commission meeting regarding scheduled meetings with the High Speed Rail Authority and SANDAG to discuss long range transportation improvements along the 1-15 corridor. Item 7G 00025G AFT 1-15 INTERREGION*ARTNERSHIP SHORT-TERM TRANSP TATION STRATEGIES • The actions described below are presented as initial steps t oward addressing the jobs/housing imbalance that exists between Western Riverside County and the San Diego region, The Partnership chose these particular actions because they: address the common goal of reducing single occupant vehicles in congested commute corridors; they can be implemented immediately; and they will have a positive measurable benefit . STRATEGY 1. Interregional coordination and expansi on of van/carp ool programs The Riverside Co unty Transportation Commission (RCTC) is responsible for management of vanpool and carpool programs in Riverside County, much like SANDAG is for the San Diego region. This strategy involves the two agencies working together to develop ways to promote and serve interregional car/vanpools and improve carpool and vanpool matching rates . As demand for employer based transportation grows it may prove to be more efficient to transition to larger vehicles and create "buspools " for specific employers or clusters of employers. SANDAG and RCTC are currently working together to define potential strategies. 2. Expand park -and -ride lots and improv e rideshare information signage This strategy will result in the coordination of Park -and -Ride lots along the 1-15 Corridor with the expansion of carpool, vanpool and public transit services. Developing secure, maintained and well identified locations would help encourage ride sharing and could serve as collection points for any future bus service in the corridor. Caltrans along with SANDAG, RCTC, and transit agencies will work to identify locations for Park -and -Ride lots and ensure coordination with carpool, vanpool and public transit services . 3. Joint marketing Several agencies are involved in promoting alternative modes of transportation in the 1-15 Corridor. SANDAG and RCTC provide carpool and vanpool services; the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) will be initiating commuter express bus service beginning in January 2003; Caltrans, through its park -and -ride Lot Program, provides support for these services. This strategy would have these agencies and other interested agencies working together to develop joint marketing programs, targeting drive alone commuters along the I- 15 Corridor. Programs should be designed to reach commuters both at home and at work. The Riverside Transit Agency is currently working with individual jurisdictions to require developers to fund transit service for proposed developments. LEVEL OF AGENCY(S) EFFORT SAN DAG, RCTC Caltrans Districts 8 and 11, RCTC, SAN DAG Riverside Transit Agency, RCTC, SANDAG, Caltrans Districts 8 and 11, NCTD MTDB . Moderate Moderate Moderate 000257 Godbellesearch & Analysis DRAFT VERSION 2.1T Jobs/Housing Imbalance Survey Presented to the 1-15 Interregional Partnership September 16, 2002 60 Stone Pine Road Half Moon Bay CA94019-1739 Phone 650/712-3137 Fax 650/7123131 95 South Market Street, Suite 300 San Jose CA 95113-2350 Phone 408/288-9232 Fax 408/288-9212 445 South Figueroa Street, 2600 Los Angeles CA 90071-1631 Phone 213/624-8863 Fax 213/624-8864 640 Grand Avenue, Suite G Carlsbad CA 92008-2365 Phone 760/730-2941 Fax 760/720-4706 000258 Introduction • Introduction Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA) is pleased to present the results of a resident opinion research project conducted for the I-15 Interregional Partnership. This report is organized into the following sections: Introduction to Study This section provides a brief introduction to the motivation and structure of the studies being conducted for the I-15 Interregional Partnership. • Executive Summary The Executive Summary includes a summary of the Key Findings from the survey and a Jobs/Housing Imbalance Summary section, which pulls together the data from the survey to characterize the jobs/housing imbalance, its causes, and its effects in a concise narrative. Methodology The Methodology section explains the methods and procedures used to conduct this study. This section also explains how to interpret the detailed crosstabulation tables in Appendix B. Summary of Results In the body of the report, we present a question -by -question analysis of the survey. The dis- cussion is organized into the following sections: • Basic Individual Commute Patterns • Basic Household Commute Patterns • School Commute Details • Word Commute Details • Employment Details • Living in Riverside County • Selecting a Home • Trade-offs • Attitudes about Priorities, Area and Commuting • Demographics and Background Appendices We have included the followingAppendic&s: • Appendix A, which presents the questionnaire. • Append& B, which presents the weighted crosstabulations. I-15Interregional Partners* Job/Housing Survey Codbe Research &Analysis Page 1 000259 Introduction to Study Introduction to Study • The California Department of Housing & Community Development recently awarded grant funding to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG), and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for the purpose of examining the imbalance of jobs and housing between Western Riverside County and its neighboring counties to the south and west (San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles County). 'No voluntary interregional partnerships — the I-15 Interregional Partnership and the SR -91 Interregional Partnership — were formed from the agencies mentioned above as well as key decision -makers from public and private sector organizations. The 1-15 Interregional Part- nership is focused on the jobs/housing imbalance between Riveside County and San Diego County, as well as the major interregional commute between Riverside County and San Diego County along Interstate 15. Likewise, the SR -91 Interregional Partnership is focused on the jobs/housing imbalance between Riverside County and its westem neighbors (Orange County and Los Angeles County) and the associated commute along State Route 91. The resident and commuter surveys summarized in this report represent the second of a four-part research study designed to A) profile the existing jobs/housing imbalance that - exists between Western Riverside County and its neighboring counties to the south and west and B) better understand the factors, rationales and decisions of residents and employers that cause the jobs/housing imbalance and associated congestion on the I-15 and SR -91. The motivation for the study was to gather reliable data that regional planners can use to develop short-term and long-term strategies to address the jobs/housing imbalance and associated congestion.The following report has been tailored to reflect the interests of the I- 15 Interregional Partnership. Where appropriate, the focus is on I-15 commuters as defined in this study. In addition the resident and commuter surveys (Stage 2), a set of four commuter focus groups (Stage 1) have been completed to date. It is expected that a study of businesses (Stage 3) will be completed prior to developing the long-term and short-term strategies, and resi- dent focus groups will be conducted once the strategies have been developed to gauge popu- lar reaction to the proposed strategies (Stage 4). The design of the survey instrument employed in this study was a collaborative effort involv- ing staff from Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), Orange County Council of Governments (OCCOG), Godbe Research & Analysis (GRA), and the IBI Group. Dr. Timothy McLarney, Director of Research at GRA, was primarily responsible for the overall research design, including the survey instrument, sampling methodology, interviewing protocol, and analysis plan. /-l5 Interregional Parinersbi9Job/Housing Sur ey Godbe Research &Analysis Paget -000260 Executive Summary Executive Summary Key Findings Based on an analysis of the survey data, Godbe Research & Analysis offers the following key findings: Basic Individual Commute Patterns • Forty-nine percent of Western Riverside adult residents are employed full-time, eight per- cent part-time, and five percent are self-employed. • Eighty-four percent of those employed full-time, part-time or self-employed commute to work at least three days per week. An additional six percent work from home or telecom - mute. • Among telecommuters, 75 percent work from home five or more days per week. • Of those that commute to work, just over half (55%) commute to a city within Riverside County. Other counties include Orange (13%), Los Angeles (12%), San Diego (8%) and San Bemardino (7%). • Almost 35 percent of adult residents in the Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area who commute to work commute to San Diego County. • Fifty-six percent of individuals who commute to Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura or another County aside from Riverside, San Diego, San Bernardino or Imperial stated that they travel on SR -91 when commuting. • Fifty -percent of respondents who commute on SR -91 indicated that they use the 91 Express Lanes at least once per week. • Over 92 percent of respondents who commute to San Diego County or Imperial County use I-15 when they commute. • Just under one quarter (24%) of Western Riverside residents who commute to San Diego or Imperial counties use FasTrak at least once per week. • Overall, four percent of Western Riverside adult residents qualified as an I-15 commuter, which means they commute to work in San Diego County or Imperial County using I-15 at least three days per week. (Ahnost all I-15 commuters commute to San Diego County as opposed to Imperial County). • Within the Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area, 24 percent of those surveyed quali- fied as an I-15 commuter. Basic Housebold Commute Patterns • Forty-two percent of households in Western Riverside County have at least one member who commutes outside of the County for work. • The Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area has the highest percentage of commuting households: 51 percent. 1-i5 Interregicmal Partnersbip Job/Housing Survey Godbe Research &Analysis Page3 0t 0261 Executive Summary • Thirty-two percent of households in Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester contain at least one person who commutes to San Diego County for work. • Among all commuting households in Western Riverside County, the average number of persons per household who commute to San Diego County is 0.2. • Among households in the Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area, the average number of persons per household who commute to San Diego County is 0.76. School Commute Details Work Commute Details • A majority (55%) of students reported that they begin their commute to school between 7 AM and 8:30 AM. ■ Approximately 75 percent of students commute less than 30 minutes to school. • Almost 60 percent of commuters begin their commute prior to 7:30 AM. • I-15 and SR -91 commuters begin their commute substantially earlier than other types of commuters. ■ The average distance between home and work for I-15 commuters is 52 miles. • The average time it takes to commute to work for I-15 commuters is 60 minutes. • The average time it takes to commute back home from work for I-15 commuters is 71 _ minutes. _ • Nearly 60 percent of commuters begin their commute back from work between 3 PM and 5:30 PM. • Overall, 43 percent of I-15 commuters indicated that they spend much more time com- muting than they would like to spend. • Nearly 60 percent of I-15 commuters stated that their commute to and from work has gotten slower during the past year. • Eighty-six percent of I-15 commuters drive alone as a primary or secondary method of commuting to work. ■ Seventeen percent of I-15 commuters carpool as a primary or secondary method of com- muting to work. • Among those who drive alone to work, the average number of days per week they drive alone is 4.6. • Among those who carpool as a primary or secondary method of commuting to work, the average number of days per week that they carpool is 3.9. • When asked to indicate the City that they work in, I-15 commuters most often mentioned the City of San Diego (40%), followed by Escondido (11%), Oceanside (8%) and Carlsbad (6%). 1-15lnte:regional PartnersbPJob/Housing Survey Godbe Research &Analysts Page 4 ..0,00262 Executive Summary Employment Details • When compared to the non -commuter group, I-15 commuters are more likely to be employed in Hi-tech/Computers/Internet and 'other' industries. A significant percentage (7%) of I-15 commuters are employed by the military. • I-15 commuters are more likely than non -commuters to be employed in occupations that require training and education, such as 'Manager/Administrator/Executive' and 'Technical Specialty/Technician'. • I-15 commuters, as a group, earn more annual income from their jobs than their non - commuting counterparts. • Job stability is greater among I-15 commuters than their non -commuting counterparts. • A substantial percentage of I-15 commuters have relocated with their present employer. • 1tventy percent of I-15 commuters are allowed to telecommute at least once per week. • Forty-seven percent of I-15 commuters are allowed to adjust their work schedule (flex- time). • Thenty-one percent of I-15 commuters work for an employer that sponsors carpools, vanpools or other programs. Living in Riverside County • Almost 50 percent of I-15 commuters have lived in Riverside County for less than five years. • Almost 65 percent of I-15 commuters who moved to Riverside County in the past 10 years stated that they did so, in large part, because the cost of living and housing was less expensive. • Sixty percent of I-15 commuters who have lived in Riverside County less than 10 years moved to Riverside County from San Diego County. • I-15 commuters are generally very satisfied with Riverside County as a place to live, and twice as many I-15 commuters feel that Riverside County is a better place to live than San Diego County than the reverse. Selecting a Home Dade -off • When selecting their home, I-15 commuters indicated that affordability, safety of neigh- borhood, and overall look and feel of the home were the strongest factors in their deci- sion. • Over half (52%) of I-15 commuters did not consider homes near their place of work when they were searching for their current residence. The main reasons for not consider- ing homes near their work were cost of housing and cost of living. • Fifty-eight percent of I-15 commuters indicated that they would be interested in applying for a job within a 15 minute drive of their current home even if it involved changing careers. 1-15 Interregional PartnersbipJob/Housing Survey GodbeRsmmb &Analysis Pages 000263 Executive summary • Thirty-one percent of I-15 commuters indicated that they would be interested in applying for a job within a 15 minute drive of their current home even if it involved a 10 percent reduction in pay. ■ Eighty-nine percent of I-15 commuters live in a single family, detached home. • I-15 commuters generally expressed a strong preference for living in a single family, detached home. • Although 63 percent of I-15 commuters who own a home in Riverside County would be interested in moving their residence to be within a 15 minute drive of their current employer if it involved a similar home at the same price, interest in moving declines sub- stantially once trade-offs such as smaller home size or higher mortgages are introduced. • I-15 commuters who rent their residence in Riverside County were more interested than their home -owning counterparts in making trade-offs to move their residence within a 15 minute drive of their current employer. • A substantial percentage of I-15 commuters indicated that, if the services were available, they would be likely to `regularly carpool to work' (60%), `regularly use a vanpool service to commute to work if the vanpool group received a $400 monthly incentive' (56%), and 'use a free service that would match them with a convenient carpool' (56%). • Forty-eight percent of I-15 commuters stated that they would be at least somewhat more - likely to carpool if a carpool lane were developed on I-15 that spanned the entire length of San Diego County. • Nearly 60 percent of I-15 commuters stated that they would be likely to pay a toll to use the aforementioned carpool lane if It were also a FasTrak lane. Attitudes about Priorities, Area and ■ Like other Western Riverside County residents, I-15 commuters expressed a strong prefer - Commuting ence for living in a single family home with a yard, although they were more likely than their counterparts to view having parks and open space around their home as important. • I-15 commuters are much more likely than their non -commuting counterparts to agree that they do not have enough free time to enjoy their lives. • The majority of I-15 commuters indicated that they are not interested in making sacri- fices and trade-offs in order to live and work in the same area and thereby reduce their commute. Jobs/Housing Imbalance Summary The body of this report, as well as the key findings listed above, examine the results of the survey on a question -by -question basis. Although this approach is quite useful for under- standing the detailed responses to the survey, it is also important to 'see the forest through the trees'. In other words, to step back from the detail and examine how the answers to the survey, in combination, create aportrait of the jobs/housing imbalance, its many causes and effects, and suggest possible opportunities for dealing with the imbalance and/or associated I -IS Interregional Pa tnersb Job/Housing Survey GodbeResearch Analpir Page 6- 000264 Executive Summary congestion. The following paragraphs attempt said type of summary, and are organized into four sections: Job/Housing Imbalance Profile, Causes of Imbalance, Effects of Imbalance, and Suggested Opportunities. Jobs/Housinglmbalance Profile The first goal of this study was to create a profile of the jobs/housing imbalance between Western Riverside County and its neighboring counties to the south and west. Although con- gestion on highways and freeways suggests that the jobs/housing imbalance is substantial, prior to this survey there was very limited data on exactly how `imbalanced' the regions were in this respect. The survey findings suggest that the imbalance of jobs and housing between Westem River- side County and its neighboring counties is substantial. Forty-two percent of the 348,473 households (Census 2000) in Western Riverside County contain at least one individual who commutes outside of the County for employment purposes. Commuting households are con- centrated in certain areas within Riverside County, with more than half (51%) of households in the Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area containing at least one inter -county com- muter. Although San Diego County is the destination of fewer commuters than Los Angeles County and Orange County, respectively, it nevertheless experiences a substantial number of Western Riverside commuters. Approximately seven percent of the households in Western Riverside County -- or 23,696 households -- contain at least one individual who commutes to San Diego County. Across all Western Riverside County, the average number of individuals per commuting household that commute to San Diego County is 0.198, although this average increases dramatically to 0.761 when the analysis is restricted to the Temecula, Murneta and Winchester area. Thus, the estimated number of individuals in Western Riverside County who commute to San Diego County for work purposes is 28,979i, of whom 16,557 live in the Temecula, Munieta and Winchester area." Causes of Imbalance Housing affordability and housing preferences are the first two keys to understanding why the jobs/housing imbalance exists between Riverside County and San Diego County. The sur- vey results paint a convincing portrait that I-15 commuters' strong preference for a single- family detached home, coupled with the greater availability and affordability of this type of housing in Western Riverside County, has tempted many former San Diego County residents 'This estimate is calculated as follows: 146,359 commuting households x 0.198 individuals per commuting household that commute to San Diego County. "This estimate is calculated as follows: 21,757 commuting households in the Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area x 0.761 individuals per commuting household that commute to San Diego. County. 1-t5 Interregional Partners6ipJob/Housing Survey GodbeResearc.b &Analysis Page 7 gra 000265 Executive Sununary to move to Western Riverside County and endure the commute to their work place in San Diego County. One of the more striking pair of statistics uncovered in the survey is that almost half (49%) of I-15 commuters have lived in Western Riverside County less than 5 years, and 60 percent of I-15 commuters originally moved to Western Riverside County from San Diego County! The dominant reason for the inter -regional migration is the availability and cost of the housing type that is preferred by approximately 90 percent of I-15 commuters: the single family, detached home. Eighty -percent of I-15 commuters own their own home, with nearly 90 percent living in a single family, detached home. This rate of home ownership is much higher than the comparable figure for San Diego County (55%), as is the percentage of those living in a single family, detached home (59% for San Diego County)' When asked why they moved to Riverside County in an open-end question, 64 percent of I-15 commuters stated that they moved to Riverside County because of the lower cost of housing/ cost of living in the area. Moreover, nearly half (45%) of I-15 commuters who moved to Riv- erside County did not consider homes near their employer in San Diego County, largely because of the greater cost of housing/cost of living near their employer. Naturally, the remaining key to understanding the cause of the jobs/housing imbalance between Riverside County and San Diego County is related to employment options. During the focus groups, I-15 commuters complained almost in unison about the lack of compara- ble jobs available in Riverside County. They voiced the belief that either a job similar to theirs does not exist in Riverside County, or the pay rate is considerably lower in Riverside County. The employment related questions in the survey do support the notion that I-15 commuters are commuting to jobs that are somewhat different than those filled by their non -commuting counterparts. Although there are some differences in the industries of employment — with I-15 commuters more likely than non -commuters to be employed in Hi- tech/Computers/Internet industries — the main difference is with respect to occupation. I-15 commuters are more likely than their non -commuting counterparts to be employed in occu- pations that require training and education!" They also receive higher salaries, on average, than their non -commuting counterparts. One of the more interesting findings, moreover, is that 1-15 commuters exhibited greater job stability when compared to their non -commuting counterparts. The greater job stability, coupled with the finding that most 1-15 commuters moved to Western Riverside County within the past 10 years from San Diego County, indicates that many I-15 commuters moved 1DThese figures on based on GRA's San Diego Region Public Opinion Survey conducted in 2002. '°The exception to this pattern is the comparably high percentage (10%) of I-15 commuters•who are employed by the military. I-15 Interregional PartnersbrpJob/Housing Survey -Godbe?e earcb &Analxis cc 02 6 Executive Summary to Western Riverside County knowing full -well that they would be commuting to San Diego County for their job. In other words, the job came fast, the move came second. Effects oflmbalance Suggested Opportunities There are a number of ways to characterize the effects of the jobs/housing imbalance based on the survey results. For convenience, we have grouped them into two categories: transpor- tation related effects and quality of life effects. As anyone who travels on I-15 in Southern Riverside County or San Diego County during peak commute hours can attest, the jobs/housing imbalance between Riverside County and San Diego County has had a considerable, negative impact on traffic congestion in the region. As noted previously, it is estimated that 28,979 individuals regularly commute to San Diego County from Western Riverside County. Moreover, 60 percent of I-15 commuters leave for work at a time that places them in the peak commuting period in San Diego County." The distances traveled for I-15 commuters, and the length of time spent commuting, are considerable. As a group, I-15 commuters travel an average 52 miles between their residence and their commute destination. The average time spent on the commute to work is 60 min- utes, whereas the return commute averages 11 minutes longer at 71 minutes. Although nearly 17 percent of I-15 commuters carpool as a primary or secondary commuting method, the vast majority (86%) reported that they drive alone as a primary or secondary commuting_ method. The apparent increase in the number of I-15 commuters in recent years has, from the com- muters' perspective, had a noticeable impact on traffic congestion. A clear majority of I-15 commuters indicated that their commute to work, as well as their commute back home, has become slower in the past 12 months. The long commutes and traffic congestion, in turn, have a negative impact on I-15 commuters' quality of life. For example, 43 percent stated that the time they spend commuting is much more than they would like to spend. Most I-15 commuters also agreed that they do not have enough free time to enjoy their life, and they would enjoy life a lot more if they did not have to commute as far as they do now. Having profiled the job/housing imbalance, developed an understanding for its causes, and examined the various negative effects of the imbalance on transportation and quality of life in the region, the logical next question is: What do the results of the survey suggest with respect to opportunities for addressing the imbalance itself, as well as the associated traffic congestion? Prior to discussing potential opportunities, it is important to note that the survey is just one source of information that can be used to identify and assess potential strategies for dealing with the jobs/housing imbalance. Regional planners and policy -makers will undoubtedly 'They begin their commute in Riverside County between 5:30 AM and 8:29 PM. 1-l5 Interregional Partnersb oJob/Housing Survey Codbe Rereart6 f Analysts Page? 000267 Executive Summary consider other sources of information and examples from other regions when deciding which strategies to employ. Strategies for addressing the jobs/housing imbalance and associated traffic congestion on I- 15 can be separated according to whether they deal with the imbalance itself or the associ- ated congestion, as well as whether they deal with existing I-15 commuters or potential future I-15 commuters. Among the strategies that deal with the jobs/housing imbalance and focus on existing I-15 commuters, the survey suggests that attempting to entice existing I-15 commuters back to San Diego County to be closer to their current employer would not be effective. The vast majority of I-15 commuters indicated that they were simply not prepared to make the trade- offs necessary to live near their current employer, and they also expressed a high level of sat- isfaction with living in Riverside County. On the other hand, developing more jobs in West- ern Riverside County that are comparable to those currently filled by I-15 commuters is a strategy that the survey suggests could be effective in enticing a substantial number of I-15 commuters to work locally rather than commute. Seventy percent of I-15 commuters indi- cated that they would be interested in working locally if they could have a comparable job that paid the same as their current job. If the job involved a 10 percent pay reduction, 31 per- cent stated that they were still interested. The survey also suggested several opportunities that deal directly with the primary symptom of the jobs/housing imbalance: traffic congestion on I-15. For example, 19 percent of I-15 commuters indicated that their employer allows them to telecommute at least once per week, 21 percent stated that their employer sponsors carpools, vanpools or other programs, and 47 percent indicated that they are allowed to adjust their work schedule (also known as flex -time). Only a small percentage of I-15 commuters are currently taking advantage of these opportunities in a way that reduces peak commute congestion. The regional concen- tration of I-15 commuters in the Temecula, Murrieta and Winchester area is certainly con- ducive to carpool, vanpool and other transit programs. Finally, although the current state of the jobs/housing imbalance and I-15 congestion is based, in part, on the decisions and behaviors of existing I-15 commuters, the future of the jobs/housing imbalance and I-15 congestion will, in many respects, be determined by the decisions that `potential' future I-15 commuters make. Thus, in addition to addressing the needs and preferencesof existing I-15 commuters through short-term and long-term strate- gies, the challenge will be to address the needs and preferences of individuals who in the coming months and years will be deciding whether or not to live in Western Riverside County and commute to San Diego County for employment. If the results of this survey are predic- tive of the future I-15 commuter profile, the strategies will need to focus on current San Diego County residents who are employed in San Diego County and are interested in pur- chasing a single-family home. Providing these individuals with affordable housing options 1-15 Interregional ParinersbipJob/Housing Survey -GodbeResearrb &Analysis Page 1.0 0100268 Executive Summary 1) near their current employers is thus one key to keeping the jobs/housing imbalance from becoming even more pronounced in the future. 1 -15 -Interregional PartnersbipJob/Housing Survey GodbeResearcb &Analysis Page 11 • 000269 Dra ft Existing Conditions Report 1-15 Interregional Partnership October 18, 2002 San Diego Association of Governments Western Riverside Council of Governments 000270 " " " Chapter 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 1-15 Interregional Partnership (1-15 IRP) is a voluntary compact between local elected officials representing the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Caltrans and other affected governmental agencies and non -governmental organizations also participate in the partnership. The 1-15 IRP was formed in 2001 to address the imbalance of jobs and housing that has developed between the San Diego region and western Riverside County over the last five to ten years. Centered on Interstate 15, this two -county commute corridor extends from central San Diego to the cities of Lake Elsinore, Perris and Hemet as shown in Figure 1. While employment in the central and northern areas of the City of San Diego is included in this report, the residential study area is centered along 1-15 within 30 miles of the County boundary  from Lake Elsinore and Perris on the north to Escondido on the south. In this report, the larger area is referred to as the Study Corridor, and the smaller area as the Study Area. The jobs -housing imbalance between the San Diego region and western Riverside County has developed because an adequate supply of relatively affordable housing has not been built to match the employment growth in the San Diego region, combined with relatively low cost and plentiful single-family housing developments in southwestern Riverside County. This trend appears to have increased significantly in recent years. Jobs -housing balance is a condition that, when achieved, results in an adequate supply of housing (and therefore workers) being located within a reasonable commute distance of compatible employment opportunities. The benefits of jobs -housing balance include reducing demands on the highway system, improving air quality, and reducing the time spent commuting to and from work. The primary goal of the 1-15 IRP is to foster a more sustainable land use pattern providing appropriate employment closer to where people live in the study area and more affordable housing closer to employment in jobs -rich areas throughout the study corridor. By doing so, workers would have the option of living closer to work and the need for long distance interregional commuting would be reduced. In addition, the 1-15 IRP also will be developing and promoting strategies that mitigate the impacts this jobs -housing imbalance is having on congestion along the 1-15 Corridor. The Partnership has developed a three-year work program and will culminate in a Jobs -Housing Balance Action and Implementation Plan and Evaluation Program. The project is primarily funded through a grant from the California Departmentof Housing and Community Development (HCD) as part of the State's Jobs -Housing Balance Grant Program, with matching in -kind services from WRCOG and SANDAG. 3 000271 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS Based on data from the 2000 U.S. Census; an evaluation of land use, -economic, and transportation data from both regions; and a telephone survey of western Riverside residents conducted for this study, the following major findings have been identified. 1. Greater housing availability and lower housing prices in southwestern Riverside County compared to the San Diego region are key factors in the growth of interregional commuting. Residential development in the San Diego region has not kept pace with demand. In the decade leading up to the year 2000, jobs in the San Diego region grew by 23 percent. During the same period, the number of housing units increased by less than 10 percent. During August 2002, in southwestern Riverside County, where the majority of 1-15 interregional commuters reside, the median price for new and existing homes was $250,000; up 21 percent from the same month in 2001. In August 2002 the median sale price in the San Diego region was $339,000, having increased 24 percent from August 2001. A major reason for this price differential is that land costs in Riverside County are substantially less than in the San Diego region. In 2000 there were approximately 151,000 homes in southwestern Riverside County. The Western Riverside Council of Governments estimates that approximately 140,000 homes are - currently in the pipeline to be built over the next few years in the same area. This would indicate that housing availability will not be a deterrent to those choosing to look in western Riverside County for a home. The ability to own a single family detached home is very important to 1-15 interregional commuters. Approximately 90 percent of interregional commuters live in a single family detached home and80 percent own their home. This compares to 52 percent of households living in single family detached homes in the San Diego region, and 55 percent of households that are. homeowners. Survey results show that just over 90 percent would prefer owning a single family detached home compared to an attached home such as a townhome or condo. This percentage decreases only slightly when a price differential is introduced, or even when the townhome is said to be 30 minutes closer to work with a commute of only 15 minutes. While the strong desire to own a single family detached home is not unique to 1-15 interregional commuters, it is a defining characteristic. Given recent trends in residential development and housing prices in the San Diego region, there is every reason to expect that there will continue to be a segment of the San Diego population willing to move to western Riverside County to take advantage of the more affordable and available single family detached housing. • 4 000272 " " However, based on a recent survey of San Diego County residents, a fairly even split (48 percent versus 42 percent) appears to occur between those who think development -should occur in a spread out single family detached style of development versus a more compact style of development that includes townhomes, condos and apartments mixed in with shops and office space. This would -indicate that a broader range of housing types is needed to serve the needs of all San Diego residents. 3. There are a growing number of interregional commuters, most of whom have moved from the San Diego region. It is estimated that 29,000 residents of southwestern Riverside County commute into the San Diego region. Approximately half have been doing so for less than five years. Of those living in Riverside County less than 10 years, 60 percent moved there from the San Diego region. 4. 1-15 interregional commuters are concentrated in the Temecula/Murrieta area and are traveling to employment destinations throughout the San Diego region. Approximately 60 percent of the estimated 29,000 interregional commuters live in the cities of Temecula or Murrieta or the adjacent unincorporated area. Stated differently, one household in three in the Temecula/Murrieta area has at least one person commuting on 1-15 into the San Diego region. Over 40 percent of all 1-15 interregional commuters travel to jobs in northern San Diego County, including Camp Pendleton, Carlsbad and Escondido. Other key employment destinations for interregional commuters include Sorrento Valley, Rancho Bernardo, Kearney Mesa and downtown San Diego (see Figure 2). On average, interregional commuters travel 52 miles to work, spending 60 minutes going to work and 72 minutes returning home from work. 5. 1-15 interregional commuters are very satisfied living in western Riverside County. There is a very high level of satisfaction with living in western Riverside County among 1-15 interregional commuters, who indicated an even higher level of satisfaction than did residents who do not have to make the long commute. When comparing the two regions, twice as many 1-15 interregional commuters felt western Riverside County is a better place to live than San Diego county than the reverse. When asked in a focus group setting, a number of western Riverside residents indicated that "small town feel" and "slower pace" were two important reasons they liked living there over neighboring counties. This high level of satisfaction is reflected in the fact that only 63 percent had some interest in moving closer to work in San Diego county in the unlikely event they could get the same house for the same pay. The percentage with interest in moving closer to work goes down dramatically when the tradeoffs they would likely have to make in terms of housing type and cost are introduced. There appears to be somewhat more interest in changing jobs to work closer to where they live. Seventy percent would be interested in changing jobs to work locally if they were paid the same. Almost one-third would be interested in working locally even with a 10 percent cut in pay. 7 - 0002'4 6. A high percentage of interregional commuters drive alone. Currently approximately 85 percent of 1-15 interregional commuters regularly drive alone to work and 13 percent carpool. This compares to 76 percent and 12 percent for residents of the San Diego region. Survey results indicated a general interest in carpooling and vanpooling among interregional commuters. Just under half stated they would be more likely to use carpool and vanpool services if a carpool lane was extended the length of 1-15 within the San Diego region. There is currently private bus services provided between Temecula and San Diego employment centers during peak periods. Riverside Transit Agency has plans to provide bus service from the Temecula/Murrieta area to employment destinations in northern San Diego County in early 2003. About 20 percent indicated that they are allowed to telecommute at least once per week. An equal percentage said their employer sponsors carpools and vanpools, with just under half (47 percent) stating they have some degree of flex -time. 7. 1-15 peak period traffic congestion is severe south of SR 78. Traffic on 1-15 is reasonably free flow between the junction of 1-15 and 1-215 in the City of Murrieta and the City of Escondido. Congestion is off and on from just south of SR 78 down to Interstate 8 in the City of San Diego. Traffic is at level of service F (traffic volume exceeds capacity) at various points along this stretch of 1-15 during peak periods. Because of the growth that has occurred in the Temecula/Murrieta area, freeway access is backed up as well during peak periods. SANDAG forecasts for the year 2030 show conditions worsening north of Escondido particularly in the northbound. direction. Level of service F is shown in both directions south of the county line. In western Riverside County, 2020 forecasts show traffic volumes increasing 90 percent along 1-15 in the Temecula/Murrieta area and by 130 percent on 1-215 just north of the junction with 1-15. This significant increase in traffic is a reflection of the 70 percent increase in population forecasted between year 2000 and 2020. 8. 1-15 interregional commuters when compared to other residents of western Riverside County: • • Are more likely to be employed in Hi-tech/Computers/Internet industries, Are more likely to be employed in occupations that require training and education, such as 'Manager/Administrator/Executive' and 'Technical Specialty/Technician', Earn more annual income, as a group, from their jobs, Have been at their jobs longer (greater job stability). 000275 8 40.) 1-15 Percentage Of Commute rs By Zip Code WRQCO hrturskip 0 1. 25 2.5 5 7. 5 Miles SOURCE: 2002 Survey of Western Riverside Commuters W E 000276 ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE STUDY • • • The 1-15 Interregional Partnership will identify and prioritize issues related to jobs -housing balance, recommend strategies and model approaches to address the issues, and promote adoption of its recommendations into existing jurisdictional and agency plans and programs. Evaluation will occur on both a policy and a technical level. At this point, the following issues have been identified: Commuting Patterns and Trends: One of the major purposes of the 1-15 Interregional Partnership and this Existing Conditions Report is to define and document the evolving commuting pattern between the San Diego region and western Riverside County. Much of the discussion of inter -county commuting to date has been based on anecdotal information, not prepared in the context of overall travel. Initial data collection efforts coordinated through this study are designed to provide a clearer picture of evolving trends. Three primary data sources will be used to better define and document interregional commuting: a random home telephone survey of western Riverside County residents, a mail -out survey of auto drivers crossing the County boundary, and the home -to -work travel information from the 2000 Census. The telephone survey information is summarized in Chapter 3 of this report. Information from the mail -out survey (being conducted by the Southern California Association of Governments) is scheduled to be available early next calendar year, and travel information from the Census will be available in August 2003. Employment Growth Policies in Both Regions: To improve the jobs -housing balance between western Riverside County and the San Diego region additional employment opportunities need to be provided in western Riverside County. Riverside County is currently a housing -rich and jobs -poor region. In order for the County to become more economically diverse and create jobs closer to home for local residents, it will need to continue to encourage commercial and industrial development to grow and/or relocate within its borders. Economic development not only provides jobs for local residents, it also contributes significantly to establishing the tax base necessary to provide new and/or improved infrastructure and public services to support development. In western Riverside County, there is an active program to attract employment. In general, these programs look for clean industries and professional employers. Housing in the County is being developed at a variety of price ranges to accommodate employees and executives. In the San Diego region, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation (EDC) pursues programs to improve the business climate, retain and expand existing companies, and recruits new employers. Advocating for the construction of the widest possible price range of housing is one way that EDC works to improve the business climate. SANDAG and individual jurisdictions also participate in economic development activities, with SANDAG's efforts directed primarily at increasing employment at existing companies, rather than attracting new companies to the region. In addition, SANDAG's Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy looks at ways the region can improve the business climate, educate and train the needed workforce, and improve our quality of life. 11 000277;' Housing Growth Policies in Both Regions: Concurrent with providing additional employment opportunities in western Riverside County to improve the jobs -housing balance, the San Diego region needs to provide additional housing opportunities. Local jurisdictions in both areas prepare and maintain housing elements of their general plans that encourage the construction of a full range of housing types for people of all income levels. Despite the fact that the housing elements in the San Diego region have identified enough residential land for the next five to 10 years at a variety of density ranges, for the most part, only housing at the high (by for profit developers) and low (by nonprofit developers) cost extremes is being produced. Very little housing in the moderate cost range is being produced. SANDAG established and has been working with the Regional Housing Task Force to help increase the supply of housing and address the affordability issue in the San Diego region. One of the major strategies for providing more housing in the San Diego region, while maintaining or improving our quality of life, is the implementation of smart growth plans and policies. SANDAG is calling for local jurisdictions to change their general plans and zoning ordinances to allow higher density and mixed use housing in smart growth areas, which include areas near transit service and major employment centers, and in community centers and downtown areas. At the same time, strategies for financing needed infrastructure for these areas are being developed. Much of this development is expected to occur through redevelopment or infill development, as opposed to the development of large areas of vacant land. Based on an alternatives analysis done as part of SANDAG's 2030 Regional Growth Forecast, the amount of interregional commuting between western Riverside County and the San Diego region is affected by the capacity for residential development contained in local general - plans in the San Diego region. The forecast shows that increased implementation of smart growth policies in the San Diego region (i.e., the more housing units included in local general plans) results in fewer people who work in the San Diego region living in western Riverside County. Other strategies that SANDAG is recommending that the region pursue include creating additional funding sources for affordable housing, removal of barriers to housing, and implementing an education program to counter NIMBYism and show good examples of smart growth housing. SANDAG also is preparing a Regional Comprehensive Plan in which strategies to solve the region's housing crisis and the financing of needed infrastructure will play a prominent role. Riverside County is a major provider of housing in Southern California. Housing is less expensive and more available than in neighboring Orange and San Diego counties. As an increasing number of workers in San Diego and other adjacent counties seek housing options in Riverside County, more local residents may become priced out of the housing market given that wages are generally higher within these job -rich areas. The anticipated employment and population growth in Riverside County will likely compound the problem of local housing affordability, not only for lower income households but also for households with moderate and middle incomes. Transportation Congestion: One significant bi-product of the increasing number of persons commuting to jobs in the San Diego region from Riverside County is increased congestion along 1-15. This study will attempt to quantify the degree to which interregional commuters add to the congestion along this very busy corridor. The need to address 1-15 congestion both in terms of mitigating existing impacts through transportation demand measures such as carpooling, vanpooling, flex -time, and teleworking, and in terms of land use policies to reduce the demand for long distance interregional commuting will be discussed. Strategies from this study will be • • 411, 12 000278 " " " incorporated into the regionaltransportation plans of the two regions and into San Diego's Regional Comprehensive Plan. - PURPOSE OF REPORT Document Existing Conditions: The Existing Conditions Report is the first milestone in the 1-15 IRP work program. Its purpose is to present information about the land use characteristics and (transportation facilities in the study corridor. Housing and employment opportunities and constraints to housing production and employment growth also are described. Maps and tables depict the current land uses and measure transportation demand in the study corridor as well as analyze the existing employment potential, housing demand, new housing production, planned transportation improvements and current transportation performance, and the relationship between housing availability and employment opportunities in the study corridor. Define the Interregional Commuting Problem: Much of the discussion about interregional commuting has been based on limited observations. From these observations, we know that congestion on 1-15 is growing and that some of the vehicles caught in that congestion come from Riverside County. This report is an initial attempt to quantify the interregional commute and explain the various reasons why it is made. Document Current Programs to Resolve Issues: The interregional commute between Riverside County and the San Diego region is a relatively recent phenomenon. Nevertheless, a number of current programs address the causes and effects of this long-distance commute. These programs range from activities to attract employment to predominantly residential communities to housing programs in job -rich areas. This report identifies those existing programs. Forecast Year 2020 Commute Conditions: Along with evaluating existing traffic conditions within the study corridor, future year forecast conditions will be discussed. The difficulty with this process is that data developed for this project have not been previously incorporated into the forecasting process and, as a result, data should be reviewed with that knowledge in mind. Provide Information for Future Strategy Development The information provided in the Existing Conditions Report will be used to help develop the strategies that will improve the jobs - housing balance between the two regions. NEXT STEPS Identify and Refine Strategies: All possible strategies to improve the balance of jobs and housing in the study corridor and reduce existing impacts on 1-15 congestion will be evaluated in light of information brought out from this study. The 1-15 IRP Technical Working Group, which includes staff representatives from local jurisdictions, economic development groups, transportation agencies and various other affected or interested agencies, will be part of the strategy development and evaluation process. Public input will also be solicited and will include focus groups to aid in assessing the potential success of a final set of recommended strategies. 000279 13 Refine Study Work Program: In initiating the San Diego -Riverside study, the partners developed a three-year study work program based on an understanding of the Tong-dittance commuting situation at the time. Based on the additional information presented in this report, the scope of the work program will be re-evaluated. 14 •-) " AGENDA ITEM 7H " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Program Committee Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding No. M22-002 with Coachella Valley Association of Governments PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve a Memorandum of Understanding No. M22-002 between the Commission and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) setting forth responsibilities for the administration of the 2002 Measure "A" Sales Tax Program in the Coachella Valley. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Shortly after the adoption of the Commission's Measure "A" Sales Tax in 1988, the Commission and CVAG entered into several memorandums of understanding regarding the administration of the Measure "A" Sales Tax Program and the Coachella Valley Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee. CVAG has now requested that the Commission enter into a new memorandum of understanding for the Commission's new sales tax program (if approved by the voters). CVAG's Technical Advisory Committee and Transportation Committee have both approved the memorandum of understanding. CVAG staff informs us that it anticipates that the memorandum of understanding will be presented to the CVAG Executive Committee at the end of October. The draft memorandum of understanding attached closely mirrors the existing memorandums of understanding with CVAG for the Commission's existing sales tax. With respect to the TUMF Program, the memorandum of understanding establishes the following: 1. That CVAG will be responsible for implementing and administering the CVAG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program under the Commission's 2002 sales tax measure and shall advise RCTC with respect to that program. Item 7H 2. That the program will remain in effect in its current form and that RCTC will disburse Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads funds to CVAG that are withheld from cities who do not participate in the CVAG TUMF Program. With respect to the Measure "A" Sales Tax (2002), the memorandum of understanding establishes the following: 1) That CVAG will advise RCTC with respect to the implementation of Measure "A" in the Coachella Valley, including advice regarding priorities and funding for highway programs, administrative procedures for the Regional Arterial Transportation Program and options for debt financing. 2) That CVAG will have flexibility within the guidelines of the Overall Work Program to allocate Measure "A" funds within the Coachella Valley. All allocations will be subject to audit. 3) CVAG will be entitled to a proportionate share of interest earned on Measure "A" income based on its proportion of funding held by RCTC. The memorandum of understanding establishes the following with regards to the temporary diversion of Measure "A" funds allocated to CVAG: (a) A temporary diversion of Measure "A" funds allocated to the Coachella Valley for projects outside the Coachella Valley must be approved by a two-thirds vote of the CVAG Executive Committee. (b) RCTC will exercise its fiduciary obligations to administer the Measure "A" program throughout the County pursuant to the requirements of State law, including SB 45. (c) RCTC will assure over the 30 -year life of the 2002 Measure "A" Transportation Improvement Program that State and Federal funds will be equitably distributed between Western Riverside County and the Coachella Valley to allow the completion of projects identified in the Measure "A" Transportation Improvement Program. The agreement requires that the Commission retain a proportionate share of the voter approved $500 million bonding limit for use in the .Coachella Valley. The share shall be based on the percentage of the County's population residing within the Coachella Valley. Attachment: Memorandum of Understanding with Coachella Valley Association of Governments MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. M22-002 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is made and entered into this 13th day of November, 2002 by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the RCTC has adopted Ordinance No. 02-001, requesting the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to place on the November 2002 ballot a sales tax measure ("Measure A" (2002)) to fund transportation programs within the County of Riverside; WHEREAS, a portion of the revenues from Measure "A" (2002) will fund transportation improvements within the Coachella Valley; and WHEREAS, RCTC and CVAG wish to set forth the responsibilities with respect to the administration of the Measure "A" (2002) Sales Tax Program; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee. (a) CVAG shall be responsible for implementing and administering the Coachella Valley Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") Program under Measure "A" (2002) and shall advise RCTC with respect to that program. (b) CVAG shall continue to administer the CVAG TUMF Program as it exists on the date hereof. (c) RCTC will disburse to CVAG the Measure "A" (2002) Local Streets and Roads funds that are withheld from a city or the county because they are not a participant in the CVAG TUMF Program. These funds will be considered as in lieu TUMF and will serve as match funds for the Measure "A" (2002) Regional Arterial Program funds. 1 000283 Implementing Measure "A" (2002). CVAG shall also be responsible for advising RCTC with respect to the implementation of Measure "A" (2002) in Coachella Valley as follows: (a) The Measure "A" (2002) Program's administrative policies and procedures with respect to the Coachella Valley, including but not limited to recommendations as to maintenance of effort requirements, disbursement of Measure "A" funds and desirability of and options for debt financing; (b) Priorities and funding for highway programming within the Coachella Valley; (c) Administrative procedures and priorities for the regional arterial transportation program; Specific tasks and responsibilities will be determined annually through and approved work program by mutual agreement of the - Parties. 3. CVAG's Use of RCTC's Measure "A" (2002) Funds. (a) CVAG will have maximum flexibility within the guidelines of the yearly Overall Work Plan to allocate Measure "A" (2002) funds. Expenditures will be subject to subsequent audit. (b) Expenses charged by CVAG for work performed by CVAG staff or by its consultants must be for the development of the Measure "A" (2002) Program or a specific Measure "A" funded project for the Coachella Valley. (c) All expenses are to be verified by audits performed by RCTC or its agents. CVAG must reimburse the Measure "A" (2002) Regional Arterial Fund for any expenses which are determined to be ineligible. Interest on Accumulated Measure "A" Funds. (a) Measure "A" (2002) Funds allocated to the Coachella Valley and held by RCTC will accrue interest. The interest to be accrued to the Coachella Valley account will be that proportion of interest earned which is equal to the proportion of Coachella Valley funds held to the total Measure "A" (2002) Funds held by the RCTC. (b) Measure "A" Funds allocated to CVAG but diverted to other programs with CVAG's approval will accumulate interest as if they remained in the CVAG account. 5. Policy Regarding the Diversion of Measure Funds Allocated to CVAG. (a) The Executive Committee of CVAG must approve by a 2/3 vote any diversion, including loans of Measure "A" (2002) revenues, of funds allocated to the Coachella Valley under Measure "A" (2002) to Measure "A" (2002) projects outside of the Coachella Valley, (b) RCTC shall exercise its fiduciary responsibility to administer Measure "A" throughout the County and to perform transportation planning and programming under the authorities set forth in State Law, including Sections 130000 et seq. and 240000 et seq. of the Public Utilities Code. In addition, RCTC shall perform its duties under SB 45 to administer the State Transportation Improvement Program ("STIP") in Riverside County. CVAG shall provide the .Commission with an annual accounting of Measure "A" funds used or held by CVAG. (c) The RCTC will assure over the course of the thirty (30) year Measure "A" (2002) Transportation Improvement Plan the equitable distribution of Measure "A" (2002) and State and federal funds between the Western Riverside County and Coachella Valley areas to affect completion of the identified projects as approved by the voters or which may be identified through subsequent amendments to the Plan. 6. Policy Regarding Reserving Bonding Limit for Measure "A" Funds. (a) The Commission agrees to reserve a proportionate share of the voter approved $500 million bonding limit for Measure "A" (2002) Funds for use within the Coachella Valley based. on the percentage of population of the County residing within the Coachella Valley as reported by the State Department of Finance. The current percentage is approximately 26%. 3 00085 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY COACHELLA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION: ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS: By: By: John F. Tavaglione Richard "Dick" Kelly Chairman Chairman REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: By: Eric Haley Patricia "Corky" Larson Executive Director Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Best, Best & Krieger LLP Toni Eggebraaten Counsel to the Riverside County Counsel to the Coachella Valley Transportation Commission Association of Governments 000 $6- 4 AGENDA ITEM 71 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM• ' Plans and Programs Committee Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adoption. of Resolution No. 03-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Recommending that the Southern California Association of Governments Be Identified as the Designated Recipient of Federal Urbanized Area Formula Funds for the Temecula - Murrieta and Indio - Cathedral City - Palm Springs Urbanized Areas" PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 03-012 recommending to the Governor of the State of California that the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) be identified as the Designated Recipient for Federal Transit Administration Funds apportioned to the newly combined urbanized area of Indio - Cathedral City - Palm Springs as well as the newly established Temecula - Murrieta urbanized area; and, 2) Direct staff to seek written concurrence from the two transit agencies serving these areas. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Annually, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) distributes federal operating and capital block grant funds to urbanized areas (UZA) through its Section 5307 Program. On May 1, 2002, the Bureau of the Census released the UZA designations for the 2000 Census. Prior to the 2000 Census being released, there were four urbanized areas in Riverside County: Riverside -San Bernardino, Hemet, Palm Springs, and Indio/Coachella. As a result of the 2000 Census, the following changes have occurred: 1) The urbanized areas for Palm Springs and Indio/Coachella have been combined into one UZA and renamed the Indio - Cathedral City - Palm Springs UZA. This area has a population count of 254,856. During FY 03, it is anticipated that $1,849,608 in Section 5307 funds will be Item 71 available for the purchase of capital projects. Cities included in this UZA are Cathedral City, Coachella, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and Rancho Mirage. SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) is the current transit operator serving these cities; and 2) The Temecula-Murrieta urbanized area was established with a population count of 229,810. During FY 03, it is estimated that $1,197,645 in Section 5307 funds will be available for capital projects. Cities included in the Temecula-Murrieta UZA include: Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Perris and Temecula. The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) serves as the primary transit operator for these cities. An applicant for Section 5307 funds, in an urbanized area with a population over 200,000, must identify a Designated Recipient (DR) (in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5303-5306) to receive and dispense funds. FTA requires that the Governor, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) serving as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the region, RCTC serving as the county transportation commission and the affected public transit operators jointly designate a recipient to apply for, receive, and dispense funds for the UZA. In addition, the cities located within each of the areas must concur with the selection of the DR. Currently, the State of California Department of Transportation, on behalf of the Governor, serves as the DR for the Indio Cathedral City - Palm Springs UZA. However, due to the increase in population, a new DR must be identified before a grant application requesting the use of FY 03 funds can be processed. To preclude any possible interruptions in the flow of funds to RTA, SunLine and the region, it is essential that a DR be named as expeditiously as possible. SCAG currently serves as the DR for the Riverside -San Bernardino UZA as well as most large UZAs through the five county region. Staff recommends that SCAG be identified as the DR for the new urbanized . areas. Identifying SCAG as the DR for the Indio — Coachella - Palm Springs UZA as well as the newly established Temecula-Murrieta UZA would continue to foster an effective planning process that promotes an efficient overall transportation investment strategy. The role of the, DR includes preparing a Long Range Transportation Plan, such as the Regional Transportation Plan that SCAG currently prepares and files. Staff has conferred with both RTA and SunLine and they have concurred that SCAG should be named the DR for both of the urbanized areas. 00088 RESOLUTION NO. 03-012 • • "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS BE IDENTIFIED AS THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT OF FEDERAL URBANIZED AREA FORMULA FUNDS FOR THE TEMECULA-MURRIETA AND INDIO CATHEDRAL CITY - PALM SPRINGS URBANIZED AREAS" WHEREAS, on May 21, 2002, the Bureau of the Census released the urbanized area (UZA) designations for the 2000 Census; and WHEREAS, the. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) uses this data to allocate federal funds from its Urbanized Area Formula Fund program; and WHEREAS, the Temecula-Murrieta UZA has been created and the Indio - Cathedral City - Palm Springs UZA has been identified as having a population of over 200,000; and WHEREAS, federal regulations require that a statewide or regional agency responsible under state law for financing, construction, or operating directly, by lease, contract, or otherwise of public transit services be named by the Governor, responsible local officials, and providers of publicly owned transit services as the Designated Recipient for the purposes of receiving and dispensing FTA Urbanized Area Formula Funds in accordance with the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 5303-5306; and WHEREAS, the Southern California Council of Governments (SCAG) currently serves as the Designated Recipient for FTA Urbanized Area Formula Funds for the Riverside -San Bernardino UZA; and WHEREAS, the naming of SCAG as the Designated Recipient of FTA Urbanized Area Formula Funds for the Temecula-Murrieta and the Indio - Cathedral City - Palm Springs UZAs would foster an effective planning process that ensures connectivity between modes, and promotes efficient overall transportation investment strategies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commissioners of the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby recommends that the Governor of the State of California identify SCAG as the Designated Recipient to receive and dispense funds for the Temecula-Murrieta and Indio - Cathedral City - Paim Springs UZAs. Item 71 000289 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission that SCAG shalt be named as the Designated Recipient. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Approved and adopted this 13t'' day of November, 2002. John F. Tavaglione, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission Attest: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission AGENDA ITEM 7J • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2003 Amendment to Commuter Rail's Short Range Transit Plan — Allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds and Local Transportation Funds PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve to reduce the original $1.8 million allocation in State Transit Assistance (STA) Funds for the La Sierra Station Parking Expansion to $1 million; 2) Allocate $302,100 in STA Funds for the completion of the Federal Transit Administration's Alternative Analysis for the San Jacinto Branch Line; 3) Allocate $100,000 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for rail station operating and legal expenses; and, 4) Amend the Short Range Transit Plan to reflect these changes. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RCTC's Commuter Rail Program is requesting approval of the following FY 03 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) Amendments: 1) La Sierra Station Parking Expansion: In March, 2002, the Commission allocated $1.8 million in STA funds for this project. To date, no funds have been claimed against this amount. Last month, the Commission awarded the construction contract for the La Sierra Station Parking Expansion to Riverside Construction Inc. The amount of the contract, including design, is under $1 million. As a result, the Rail Program is requesting that the Commission reduce the original allocation from $1.8 million to $1 million. This project was originally approved in the Commuter Rail's FY 02 SRTP; Item 7J 2) San Jacinto Branch Line: An additional allocation of $302,100 in STA funds is requested to fund the completion of the Federal Transit Administration's required Alternatives Analysis for the San Jacinto Branch Line; and 3) Rail Station & Legal Expenses: An additional allocation of $100,000. in LTF funds is being . requested to cover rail station operating expenses and legal expenses. A number of repairs have been required during the first quarter of this fiscal year. The award of the landscaping contract to a new vendor has resulted in identification and repair of old sprinkler systems, removal of hazardous trees and, other repairs to improve the safety and appearance of the commuter rail. stations. In addition, an increase in legal costs has occurred, and will continue to occur, due to the Placentia train accident in April. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $302,100 -STA $100,000 - LTF Source of Funds: State Transit Assistance Funds Local Transportation Funds Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 241-62-86101 - STA 106-62-86101 - LTF Fiscal Procedures Approved: L.,4C Date: 11/13/2002 000292 AGENDA ITEM 7K RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Extension for the City of Murrieta BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to grant the City of Murrieta a twelve-month extension to June 30, 2003, to complete the Washington Avenue Sidewalk Project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Murrieta was allocated $88,000 in FY 1999-2000 SB 821 funds for construction of the Washington Avenue sidewalk project. The project is an integral part of the overall $3,500,000 City project to improve Washington Avenue in the Historic Murrieta Business District. The City requested and was granted two twelve-month extensions to June 30, 2002 to complete the project, but because of the complexity of the overall project and unanticipated staffing changes within City Hall, the project has not been completed. The Historic Downtown area improvements within this project have gone through numerous and lengthy preliminary design review. This process, although necessary, has delayed the technical design review. Therefore, the City is requesting a twelve-month extension to June 30, 2003 to complete the project. Attachment: Letter from City of Murrieta Item 7K 00028 Oct D4 02 03:54p CITY OF MURRIETR 909 698-4509 p:2 CITY OF MURRIETA 26442 Beekman Court, llunieta. CA 92562 Internet Address: Telephone: 909 -304 -CITY (2489) Fax: 909-698-4509 httpffww v.murrieta.org October 4, 2002 Mr. Jerry Rivera, Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: SB 821 Program; Washington Avenue Sidewalks; City Project 99-172; Requested Time Extension Dear Jerry: The City of Murrieta respectfully requests a time extension on the above subject project from June 30, 2002 to June 30, 2003_ This project is to provide eight -foot (8') wide sidewalks on both sides of Washington Avenue from Ivy Street to Kalmia Street. The SB 821 funds total $88,000 with an equal amount of City matching funds. This SB 821 project, as described in our original funding application, was to be for construction only and an integral part of the overall $3,500,000 City project to improve Washington Street in the Historic Murrieta Business District. Because of the complexity of the overall project and unanticipated staffing changes within City Hall, our previous time schedules were unfortunately optimistic. The Historic Downtown area improvements \.within this project have gone through numerous and lengthy preliminary design review., This process, although necessary, has delayed the technical design review. Recognizing the importance of the project, and to accelerate project implementation, the City has hired Ben Minamide (former Murrieta Director of Public Works) to manage the overall project. With Ben's leadership, we expect the construction of the overall project will be completed by June 30, 2004. 000294 AGENDA ITEM 7L " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of City of Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the City of Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan dated January 2002. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan has been submitted to the Commission for certification that it complies with the requirements of the State Bicycle Lane Account program as required by State law (SB 1095). The City has prepared the Plan in order to be eligible for a State Bicycle Lane Account (BLA) grant to fund the construction of a trail under -crossing and extensions of various bike trails throughout the city. Commission staff has reviewed the City of Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan and finds that the Plan satisfies the requirements of the BLA program as specified by State law. The Plan is not attached to this report because of its size, but a copy is available at the Commission office should any of the Commissioner wish to review it. Item 7L 000285 AGENDA ITEM 7M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget -and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Fiscal Year 2002 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Palm Springs BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the FY 2002 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Local Streets and Roads for the City of Palm Springs. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive their Measure "A" disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. The FY 2002-06 Measure "A" Plan for the City of Palm Springs was approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2001 meeting. Any revisions to the adopted Plan must be returned to the Commission for approval. The City of Palm Springs is requesting to amend their FY 2002 Plan to add one project for road improvements on Arenas Road. The City has surplus funds available from its annual Street Crack Fill project to finance this additional project. Attachments: Letter from the City of Palm Springs Revised FY 2002 Measure "A" Plan Item 7M 0002,8-6 WS 6".“5g sip 2sioo2 061839 City of Palm Springs Department of Public. Works Engineering Division 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262 TEL (760) 323-8253 • FAX (760) 322-8360 • TDD (760) 864-9527 Mr Jerry Rivera Measure A Program Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, California 92501 September 26, 2002 Re. FY 01/02 Local Measure A Program Arenas Road Street Improvements- City Project No 01-12 Request for Amendment ($32,500 increase) in FY 01/02 Measure A Funding Dear Mr Rivera This is a request for an amendment of FY 01/02 Measure A funds to apply $32,500 towards the costs to improve the roadway on Arenas Road for 1 -block (Calle Emilia to Indian Canyon Drive) A construction contract in the amount of $309,4.10 was awarded to Contreras Construction Co on August 1, 2001 (per Minute Order No 6897, Agreement No A4388) The awarded contract was funded by Downtown Parking Fund account No 132-4462-50188 The construction was completed on February 18, 2002 and Notice of Completion recorded on March 18, 2002 During the late stages of construction it became apparent that some street related change order work would exceed the funds available in the Parking Fund budget An internal request was made to transfer $32,500 in Local Measure A funds from an annual Street Crack Fill project that was completed and had a remaining surplus of Measure A funds The intent was to do a mid -year request to RCTC for amendment of FY 01-02 Measure A funding to cover the unanticipated expenditure, but the request was inadvertently missed during the administration process The Contreras contract cost totaled $337,250, plus light fixture costs ($21,446), design ($18,000), testing ($2,822), water meters & valves ($4,970), for a grand total over $384,000, not counting inspection and administration costs The City respectfully requests that the Commission consider an amendment of $32,500 increase in FY 01-02 Measure A funds to accommodate a portion of expenditures incurred by the City in mid- 2002 Attached is the Council Report awarding contract, Notice of Action (indicating final const costs) and Completion Notice If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 323-8250 'Sincerely, Robert L Mohler Grants and Govemment Affairs Manager Attachments 1 Council Report, 2 Minute Order, 3 Notice of Action, 4 Notice of Completion cc David Barakian, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Nancy Klukan, Accounting Manager X2c. j N ViCTC Menge Rd Meeaaq.� Cam - YOS{ lice`J ox9 Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 J ; 000297 RIVERSI DE COU NTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION D E© o v E MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGR AM OCT 232002 Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Grants a nd Govern ment Affairs Manager) June 15, 2001 FY 2002-06 5-Yr. Measure A Local Streets & Roads Program (F:`2001 02):; TRANS ORTATI aR Zesoa ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEAS URE ',A" FUNDS (1-13) *2000/01 Projects continued to 2001/02 (From two pre vio us pages) 58,224,527 51,639,000. New 2001/02 Projects 14. Annu al Street Crack Filling (Contract) Crack Filling (Contract Crews) 50,000 50,000 ** NOTE: Reduced amount from "crack filli ng" to be applied to New Item #22 below **(32,500) 15. ARHM Street Ov erlay(s) Asphalt -Rubber Overlays (Contract Crews) 375,000 375;000 16. LEDRetrofit of City -Wide Traffic Signals Install Energy Saving LEDs (City Match) 400,000 40,000 17. SB 821 Baristo Rd. School Safety Sidewalk Grant N. Side Baristo (e/o Su nrise to w/o Farrell) 45,000 36,000 18. Gene Autry/Palm & I-10 Interchange Construction City share of Joint Co unty/C VAG (Design) 12,228,000 500,000 19. Indian Canyon RR Bridge .@ WW River (Design) 4 -lanes (80% HBRR Grant) -design o nly 1,600,000 40,000 20. Tahqu itz & Sunrise/ E.Palm Canyon & S.Palm Can. Traffic Signal Modifications 100,000 100,000 21. Tachevah Drive Traffic Safety (Desert H ospital) Lighted Walk 5,000 5,000 22. **Arenas Road (Calle Encilia to In dian Canyon) Street Widen ing Improvements 384,000 **32,500 New 2001/02 Projects S.T. $15,187,000 $1,146,000 **Added per request to RCTC (see 9/26/02 letter) 2001/02 TOTALS $23,411,000 52,785,500 alp 2 9 " AGENDA ITEM 7N " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT• ' Fund Transfer Agreement No. 03-45-034 Between the State of California Department of Transportation and the Riverside County Transportation Commission for the Operation of a Freeway Service Patrol Program in Riverside County BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: • 1) Approve the Fund Transfer Agreement No. 03-45-034 between the State of California Department of Transportation and the Riverside - County Transportation Commission for the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol program in the amount of $1,080,400 in State funding for FY 2002-03; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program has been in operation for over nine years and provides roving tow truck service on five beats on SR 91, I-215/SR 60, and 1-15 during the morning and afternoon commute hours. The FSP program is funded by the State of California (80%) and local SAFE fees (20%). Funds are allocated to participating agencies through a formula based on population, urban freeway lane miles, and levels of congestion. The agreement for fiscal year 2002-03 provides for continued State funding in the amount of $1,080,400 and requires a local match of $270,100. This is an increase of $74,100 over the funding level for FY 2001-02. The Commission's FY 2002-03 budget for the Motorist Assistance Program includes $962,400 in State funding and $240,600 in local matching funds. The additional State and local match funds are not being requested at this time. Staff, along with the CHP and Caltrans, will review the hours of operation and service level to determine if any additional service is warranted. Item 7N 000299 Annually, the program provides approximately 26,000 assists to stranded motorists along Riverside county freeways. ` The Commission contracts with three tow truck operators to provide thirteen tow trucks to patrol these routes Monday through Friday during the peak commute hours, 5:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The programs day to day field supervision is handled by the California Highway Patrol. Attachment: FSP Program Fund Transfer Agreement No. 03-45-034 000300 " " " FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM FUND TRANSFER AGREEMENT (Non. Federal) Agreement No. FSP03-6054(001) Project No.: FSP03-6054(032) Agreement Ni!.. 03;45.-034 Location: 08-RIV-Var-RCTC EA: 08-A00034 THIS AGREEMENT, effective on July 1, 2002, is between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as STATE, and the Riverside County Transportation . Commission, a public agency, hereinafter referred to as "ADMINISTERING AGENCY." WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code (S&HC) Section 2560 et seq. authorizes STATE and administering agencies to develop and implement a Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program on traffic -congested urban freeways throughout the state; and WHEREAS, STATE has distributed available State Highway Account funds to administering agencies participating in the FSP Program in accordance with S&HC Section 2562; and WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has applied to STATE and has been selected to receive funds from the FSP Program for the purpose of Freeway Service Patrol FY 2002-2003, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and WHEREAS, proposed PROJECT funding is as follows: Total Cost State Funds Local Funds $1,350,500.00 $1,080,400.00 $270,100.00 ; and - WHEREAS, STATE is required to enter into an agreement with ADMINISTERING AGENCY to delineate the respective responsibilities of the parties relative to prosecution of said PROJECT; and WHEREAS, STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY mutually desire to cooperate and jointly participate in the FSP program and desire to specify herein the terms and conditions under which the FSP program is to be conducted; and WHEREAS, ADMINISTERING AGENCY has approved entering into this Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved .by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on , a copy of which is attached. For Caltrans Use Only hereby Certify upon my own personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance Chapte tatutes) Item I Accounting Officer (Date a9 _ w I $ og0 400 00 Fiscal Year ( Program 1 BC j Category (Fund Source 1i 379 12002 111660_ [-OM! 02/03 120.30.010.600 1 C 12.62040 1102-042-T 1 1 1 I 1 Page 1 of 5 Non OQ9, 91. 1 Meet hsr NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: SECTION I STATE AGREES: 1. To define or specify, in cooperation with ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the limits of the State Highway segments to be served by the FSP as well as the nature and amount of the FSP dedicated equipment, if any, that is to be funded under the FSP program. 2. To pay ADMINISTERING AGENCY the STATE's share, in amount not to exceed $1,080,400.00, of eligible participating PROJECT costs. 3. To Deposit with ADMINISTERING AGENCY, upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY's award of a contract for PROJECT services and receipt of an original and two signed copies of an invoice in the proper form, including identification of this Agreement Number and Project Number, from ADMINISTERING AGENCY, the amount of $172,864.00. This initial deposit represents STATE's share of the estimated costs for the initial two months of PROJECT. Thereafter, to make reimbursements to ADMINISTERING AGENCY as promptly as state fiscal procedures will permit, but not more often than monthly in arrears, upon receipt of an original and two signed copies of invoices in the proper form covering actual allowable costs incurred for the prior sequential month's period of the Progress Payment Invoice. (The initial deposit will be calculated at 16% of the STATE's total share.) 4. When conducting an audit of the costs claimed by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the provisions of this Agreement, STATE will rely to the maximum extent possible on any prior audit of ADMINISTERING AGENCY performed pursuant to the provisions of State and federal laws. In the absence of such an audit, work of other auditors will be relied upon to the extent that work is acceptable to STATE when planning and conducting additional audits. SECTION 1I ADMINISTERING AGENCY AGREES: 1. To commit and contribute matching funds totaling $270,100.00, from ADMINISTERING AGENCY resources, which shall be an amount not less than 25 percent of the amount provided by STATE from the State Highway Account. 2. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY's detailed PROJECT Cost Proposal which identifies all anticipated direct and indirect PROJECT costs which ADMINISTERING AGENCY may invoice STATE for reimbursement under this Agreement is attached hereto and made an express part of this Agreement. The detailed PROJECT Cost Proposal reflects the provisions and/or regulations of Section Ill, Article 8, of this Agreement. 3. To use all state funds paid hereunder only for those transportation related PROJECT purposes that conform to Article XIX of the California State Constitution. 4. STATE funds provided to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this Agreement shall not be used for administrative purposes by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. Page 2 of 5 Non -Fed FSP 5. To develop, in cooperation with STATE, advertise, award and administer PROJECT contract(s) in accordance with ADMINISTERING AGENCY competitive procurement procedures. 6. Upon award of a contract for PROJECT, to prepare and submit to STATE an original and two signed copies of invoicing for STATE's initial deposit specified in Section I, Article 3. Thereafter, to prepare and submit to STATE an original and twosigned copies of progress invoicing for STATE's share of actual expenditures for allowable PROJECT costs. 7. Said invoicing shall evidence the expenditure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY's PROJECT participation in paying not less than 20% of all allowable PROJECT costs and shall contain the information described in Chapter 5 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and shall be mailed to the Department of Transportation, Accounting Service Center, MS 33, Local. Programs Accounting Branch, P.O. Box 942874, Sacramento CA, 94274-0001. 8. Within 60 days after completion of PROJECT work to be reimbursed under this Agreement, to prepare a final invoice reporting all actual eligible costs expended, including all costs paid by ADMINISTERING AGENCY and submit that signed invoice, along with any refund due STATE, to the District Local Assistance Engineer. Backup information submitted with said final invoice shall include all FSP operational contract invoices paid by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to contracted operators included in expenditures billed for to STATE under this Agreement. 9. Any costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY receives payment that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable are to be repaid to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY within thirty(30) days of ADMINISTERING AGENCY receiving notice of audit findings. Should ADMINISTERING AGENCY fail to reimburse moneys due STATE within (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed between both parties hereto, STATE reserves the right to withhold future payments due ADMINISTERING AGENCY from any source, including, but not limited to, the State Treasurer and the State Controller. 10. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system conforming to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles .(GAAP) to support reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices which segregate and accumulate costs of PROJECT work elements and produce monthly reports which clearly identify reimbursable costs, matching costs, and other expenditures by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 11. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its subcontractors shall maintain all source documents, books and records connected with its performance under this Agreement for a minimum of three years from the date of final payment to ADMINISTERING AGENCY or until audit resolution is achieved and shall make all such supporting information available for inspection and audit by representatives of the STATE. Copies will be made and furnished by ADMINISTERING AGENCY upon request. 00030: Page 3 of 5 Non -Fed FSP SECTION 111 IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement is available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. The starting date of eligible reimbursable activities shall be JULY 1,2002. 2. All obligations of ADMINISTERING AGENCY under the terms of this Agreement are subject to authorization and allocation of resources by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and STATE shall jointly define the initial FSP program as well as the appropriate level of FSP funding recommendations and scope of service and equipment required to provide and manage the FSP program. No changes shall be made in these unless mutually agreed to in writing by the parties to this Agreement. 4. Nothing in.the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either' party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways different from the standard of care imposed by law. 5. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by ADMINISTERING AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to ADMINISTERING AGENCY under this Agreement. 6. Neither ADMINISTERING AGENCY nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. Page 4 of 5 Non -Fed FSP 7. - ADMINISTERING AGENCY wilt maintain an inventory of all non expendable PROJECT equipment, defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $500 or more, paid for with PROJECT funds. At the conclusion of this Agreement, ADMINISTERING AGENCY may either keep such equipment and credit STATE its share of equipment's fair market value or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale (in accordance with established STATE procedures) and reimburse STATE its proportional share of the sale price. 8. ADMINISTERING AGENCY and its sub -contractors will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including but not limited to, Office of Management and Budget Circular A-97, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments (49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments). 9. In the event that ADMINISTERING AGENCY fails to operate the PROJECT commenced and reimbursed under this Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or fails to comply with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, STATE reserves the right to terminate funding for PROJECT, or portions thereof, upon written notice to ADMINISTERING AGENCY. 10. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30, 2004; However, the non -expendable equipment, and liability clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By: Riverside County Transportation Commission By: Office of Project Implementation,South Title: Division of Local Assitance Date: Date: 000305 Page 5 of 5 Non -Fed FSP AGENDA ITEM 70 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-31-033 with DMJM + Harris for Additional Engineering Design Services for the State Route 60 HOV Project Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates • BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-31-033 (Amendment No. 9 to Agreement No. RO-2042) for DMJM'+ Harris to provide engineering design services for the State Route 60 HOV Project Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), for an additional base amount of $116,515; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its July 1999 meeting, the Commission approved the SR 60 HOV median- widening project. This Measure "A" and CMAQ funded widening project is located between Day Street and Redlands Boulevard in the City of Moreno Valley. At its February 2000 meeting, the Commission awarded a final design contract value for $2,299,400 for the subject project to Holmes & Narver Infrastructure. At its April 2001 meeting, the ` Commission approved Amendment No. 1 for additional bridge design work for a base amount of $561,460. In addition, the Commission approved $40,000 of extra work funds. The total value of Amendment No. 1 approved by the Commission was for $601,460. At its June 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 2 to delete some of the bridge work and to add the preparation of Project Study Reports for the Indian Avenue, Nason Street, and Moreno Beach Drive bridges for an additional amount of $44,290. Item 70 At its September 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 3 to perform additional lead testing at the new sound wall locations and along the pavement area for a base amount of $64,712. Additionally, the Commission approved an additional amount of $20,000 in extra work funds. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,029,862. On January 31, 2002, Amendment No. 4 was executed to extend the life of the contract with DMJM + Harris for continuing work on the SR 60 HOV Project. The contract was extended from February 1, 2002 to December 1, 2003. At its March 2002 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 5 to redesign the Perris Boulevard bridge, to add landscaping to the sound walls and to prepare a comprehensive Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to meet the requirements of Caltrans and the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board for a base amount of $270,000. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,299,862. During its June 2002 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 6 to complete various miscellaneous engineering designs such as detour profiles for Perris Boulevard undercrossing stage construction, right of way engineering and mapping, encroachment permit fees and utility pothole surveys for a base amount of $248,000. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,547,862. During its July 2002 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 8 to design additional roadway improvements on the west end of the project. The improvements included minor outside widening and re -striping to extendthe number of available lanes between the East Junction and the SR 60 HOV project for a base amount of $282,000. Amendment No. 8 brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,829,862. During its July 2002 meeting, staff informed the Commission that we currently did not have an approval of the project by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and that additional funding would be required to implement requests by the SWRCB. Staff received project approval from the SWRCB and Caltrans on October 16, 2002 on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and post construction water quality design to implement bio-swales on the project as post construction best management practices (BMPs). • " " DMJM + Harris has estimated that the cost to implement the SWPPP and BMPs and to provide additional miscellaneous engineering design is for a base amount of $116,515. The proposed Amendment No. 9 wilt bring the total authorized amount to $3,838,641 and the total extra work amount to $107,736 for a total not to exceed contract value of $3,946,377. Staff will use the standard agreement format, pursuant to Legal Counsel review. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $ 116,515.00 Source of Funds: I CMAQ and Measure "A" Budget Adjustment: 1 Y GLA No.: 222-31-81102 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: October 22, 2002 Attachment: Amendment No. 9 Scope and Cost Item 70 000308 " October 17, 2002 Mr. Bill Hughes, Project Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 RE: SR 60 HOV LANES  RIV-60-KP19.6/32.8 - EA 463601 " LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PS&E FOR BIO-SWALES " WALL # 269 DESIGN MODIFICATIONS " ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AT WALL # 269 Dear Mr. Hughes: DMJM + HARRIS (D + H) is pleased to submit this proposal to (1) prepare landscape and irrigation plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) necessary to implement the proposed bio-swales on the project; (2) prepare plans and estimates for the design modification of Wall 269 needed to avoid conflict with existing power, and water lines ;(3) Add a new wave treatment to wall # 269 facing Sunnymead Boulevard in the city of Moreno Valley. A detailed scope of work (SOW) and proposed fee to perform these tasks are included below. I. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PS&E FOR BIO-SWALES BACKGROUND Through the development of the Conceptual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (CSWPPP) and post construction water quality design, it is proposed to implement bio-swales on the project as post construction best management practices (BMPs). Based on conceptual approval of the bio-swales by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and Caltrans, RCTC has decided to implement bio-swales along State Route 60. Through the development of the proposed bio-swale locations and elevations, our landscape and irrigation subconsultant, LCI, has identified additional data necessary to design efficient and effective bio-swale implementation. Item 70 000300 Also, through the development of the bio-swale design and discussions at several PDT Meetings, it has been determined that the proposed bio-swales will be irrigated at locations where there are existing irrigation facilities and at locations where irrigation facilities are proposed for the soundwall vines. To ensure that the bio-swales are properly quantified and constructed, it is proposed to include the bio-swales in the landscape and irrigation plans. SCOPE OF WORK LCI will perform preliminary site reviews for bio-swale viability against the existing landscape conditions and proposed engineering layout. LCI will research current potential treatments for bio-swales to determine options for implementation. These include hydroseeding, stolons, chemical lining, irrigated, non -irrigated, mulched, paved, plus other methods and techniques that may be more cost effective for the situation(s) at hand. Preliminary agronomic soils testing will be performed to identify concerns regarding heavy saline conditions, boron, heavy metals, basic soil suitability to ascertain why some areas are bare and some more heavily grassed, planted etc. LCI will meet with demolition team to review concerns and exchange ideas. LCI will also meet with Caltrans and/or RCTC for, input. Since there are currently no guidelines or standards for bio-swale implementation, LCI will develop input for the SSP's and provide details as necessary for implementation to DMJM + HARRIS. We anticipate (2) submittals, one delineating the above data, and the second, incorporating any comments and concerns from Caltrans, RCTC and DMJM + HARRIS. Please see the attached breakdown for our preliminary task summary. Deliverables: (1) Modifications to nineteen (19) existing planting and irrigation plan sheets, which are part of the base soundwall project. Modifications to existing plans include the delineation of bio-swales on the planting plans and addition of irrigation on irrigation swales tying into the existing system. (2) Creation of fifteen (15) new planting and irrigation plan sheets not included in our soundwall areas to include the delineation of bio-swales and irrigation for each. FEE PROPOSAL The proposed fee for LCI to incorporate the bio-swales into the landscaping and irrigation plans, specifications and estimate is $54,800. A detailed breakdown of the proposed fee is included in Exhibit A. • 000310 " " " I1. WALL # 269 DESIGN MODIFICATIONS BACKGROUND It is Caltrans design practice on freeway project to place sound walls at the edge of their right of way. This will maximize the use of Caltrans property for future freeway widening and to minimize impacting utilities placed within its right of way. It is also to limit the cost of maintaining areas behind the new wall away from the freeway. During the design process of this wall, a conflict was noted and we began a process with Caltrans and the utility companies to better understand the potential cost impact to the project. The schedule was a big concern so we proceeded toward final design in order to minimize any impact to the project schedule. Since then, it was brought to our attention that there will be a significant cost impact born by the utility relocation. To mitigate the additional cost it was proposed that the wall alignment be shifted 2m toward the freeway in order to miss the existing utilities. SCOPE OF WORK Revise project plans and estimates to reflect the Realignment of wall # 269 from sta"B"270 + 93.2 to sta. "B" 279 + 56.541. The modified design will offset the existing wall layout line to the north by 2.0m from "B" 271 + 26.541 to "B" 279+ 56.541 and change in the length and bearing of the wall layout from "B" 270 + 93.2 to "B" 271 + 26.541. Revise computation of new top of wall and ground profiles including incorporation of revised elevations for drainage and utility crossings. Work will also include revising plan annotations for wall stationing, top of wall and footing elevations, revised location/elevation of utility and drainage crossings, revise soundwall quantity calculations and Stage Construction Plan sheets to show revised layouts and sections for the construction of Sound Wall 269. Work for this task will include revising the following plan sheets; Typical Cross Sections Layout Plans Profile Plans Contour Grading Drainage Profile Drainage Quantities Utility Plans Stage Construction Sound Wall Plan Sound Wall Details X-3 and X-6 L-20 through L 22 P-35 through P-37 G-9 through G-12 D-4 through D-6 D-20 and D-21 U-20 through U-22 SC -80 through SC -82 SW -20 through SW -25 SW -31 and SW -46 Item 70 FEE PROPOSAL The proposed fee to incorporate the above listed changes is $53,334.24 divided between two estimates detailed in Exhibits B and C. III. ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AT WALL # 269 BACKGROUND Based on the request of the City of Moreno Valley, the originally planned fractured treatment of wall # 269 will need to be modified to a wave pattern treatment. SCOPE OF WORK Prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates as needed to accommodate special architectural treatment on the face of wall # 269. The modified design will eliminate the horizontal construction joint between the barrier and the retaining wall to make the barrier integral with the wall. This will allow the form liner to be set for the entire height of the wall and the barrier without being interrupted by a construction joint. Work will include Revising the wall plans to show the new details and adding two new sheets showing the geometric layout and typical section of the architectural wave pattern. Work will also includes revising the sound wall specifications detailing information regarding the new way of constructing the retaining wall with the integral barrier FEE PROPOSAL The proposed fee to incorporate the above listed changes is $8,376.18 A detailed breakdown of the proposed fee is included in Exhibit D. Please call me if I could be of any assistance. Sincerely, DMJM + HARRIS Victor J. Martinez, P.E. Project Manager Cc: Gustavo Quintero Itei 000312' EXHIBIT A 1110 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION NAME OF CONSULTANT TITLE OF PROJECT - AMENDMENT NO.9 LYNN CAPOUYA, INC. HOV Estimated (Average) Total.Estirnated Detail Description Hours Rate/Hour Cost ($) 1.DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET . . PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE 61 $82.50 5032.50 PROJECTMANAGER: 176 $31.50 554400 IRRIGATION DESIGNER 92 $23.00 . 2116:00 LANDSCAPE DESIGNER 34 $21.50 73-1:00 DRAFTSMAN 1 0 $16.75 0.00 DRAFTSMAN 2 244 $16.00 3904.00 CLERICAL 13 $15.25 198.25 TOTAL 620 ,.___- .>? s??%=> $17,525.75 2. INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead,G&A-specify) Burden Rate X Base = ......... Burden ($) 168% . $17,525.75. $29,443.26 $29,443.26 3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines 1 and 2) $46,969.01 4. FIXED FEE OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 on Percent X Base = Fee ($) 10.00'0 $46,969,01 • $4,696.90 $4;696.90 TOTAL :: >:.::.»;:->;:.::-;:- _::>::::::x<s:_:>:::<:;:> $4,696:90 5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS PRINTING $2,6,00.00 TRAVEL .. $534.00 OVERNGHT MAIUDELIVERY $0:00 MISC (CADD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.) SUBCONSULTANTS CH2MHILL (Traffic and Stage Construction) Earth Mechanics, Inc. (Geoteclmical) Associated Engineers (Surveying) Lynn Capouya, Inc. Katz Okitsu &Associates (Electrical and Communications) The Culver Group Saf R -Dig (Potholing) 6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum of lines 3, 4 and 5) $54,800.00 0 x3.3;.. COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION NAME OF CONSULTANT DMJM+HARRIS TITLE OF PROJECT - AMENDMENT NO. 9 SR 60-Soundwall 269 - Ralignment Detail Description Estimated Hours (Average) Rate/Hour Total`Estiinated Cost($) 1. DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET PROJECT MANAGER 10 $67.30 _ 673.00 PROTECT ENGINEER 80 $56.00 4,480.00 SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER ' 240 $37.00 . :. : 8,880.00 DESIGN ENGINEER 0 $32.00 000 DESIGN ENGINEER/SENIOR CADD TECHNICIAN 80 $27.00 .' ' 2,160.00 CLERICAL $20.00. 0.00 TOTAL 410 >'==: =<s<> `''=''-; $16,193.00 2. INDIRECT COSTS (Overhead,G&A•specify) Burden Rate X Base = Burden ($) """""'" 130.60% $16,193.00 $21,148.06 $21,148.06 1 3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines 1 and 2) $37,341.064 $3,734.11 4. FIXED FEB OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 only) Percent X Base = Fee ($) 10.00% $37,341.06 $3,734.11 TOTAL ' '� �<s' < �;: # =' >_'='===>===>: >�>= $3,734.11 5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS PRINTING TRAVEL OVERNGHT MAIIJDELIVERY MISC (CARD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.) SUBCONSULTANTS 6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum of lines 3, 4 and 5) $41,075.00 000;31 10/31/2002 2:48 PM AGENDA ITEM 7P • " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager Dennis Mejia, Bechtel Resident Engineer THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director " SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-33-009 for the Construction of an Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-33-009 for the Construction of the Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station Project to Granitex Construction, Inc. for the amount of $381,919.02 plus a contingency amount of $38,080.98 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total contract authorization of $420,000.00; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel Review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: When the Pedley Metrolink Station was constructed, an emergency passenger unloading platform was included in the original station construction. This emergency passenger unloading platform is 194 feet long, located between two sets of Union Pacific tracks, and is intended to be used during situations where Metrolink passengers need to disembark from the set of tracks furthest away from the Station's main platform. Because the existing emergency passenger unloading platform is only 194 feet long, it will not easily accommodate Metrolink passenger trains over three (3) cars in length. Currently, Metrolink trains longer than three (3) cars in length must first stop and unload passengers from the first set of cars and then pull forward to unload the remaining cars. This has resulted in impacts to the freight traffic on this rail line. Extending the emergency passenger unloading platform to 510 feet to Item 7P 0003 " match the length of Metrolink trains, up to six (6) cars in length, will minimize the delays to unload passengers when the emergency platform must be used. At its February 2001 meeting, the Commission amended Contract No. RO-9952, with PB Farradyne, to develop the Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E) Design for the Emergency Passenger Unloading Platform extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station. The majority of the funding for this project is STPL Federal Funding. A Request for Authorization to Proceed with Construction was submitted to the Caltrans Office of Local Assistance on May 20, 2002. Authorization to Proceed/Obligation of Federal Funds was received on June 26, 2002. At its May 2002 meeting, the Commission authorized the Chairman to execute the Program Supplement Agreement between RCTC and Caltrans which retains the Federal Funding for this project and outlines the financial responsibilities. The Program Supplement was fully executed as of September 5, 2002. At its May 2002 RCTC meeting, the Commission also authorized staff to advertise bids for construction of the Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station. The project was advertised starting on September 16, 2002 with the bid opening on October 17, 2002. Six (6) bids were received and opened on October 17, 2002 at 2:00 pm. A summary of the bids received are shown in Table A: TABLE A Construction of the Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station Bid Summary Firm (in order from Low bid to High bid) Bid Amount Amount Over Low Bid Engineers Estimate $325,942 N/A 1. Granitex Construction, Inc. Costa Mesa, CA $381,9491 $0.00 2. Sean Malek Eng. & Const., Inc. Perris, CA $388,240 $6,291.00 3. G.B. Cooke, Inc. Azusa, CA $418,244 $36,295.00 4. Denboer Eng. & Const., Inc. Palm Springs, CA $418,530 $36,581.00 5. Riverside Construction Co. Riverside, CA $499,974 $118,025.00 6. Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. $504,786 $122,837.00 . 000316 " The bids were reviewed by Legal Counsel and Staff, and all concurred that Granitex Construction, Inc.'s low bid was the lowest responsive bid received for the project. A summary of the review of the three (3) lowest bids received and the responsiveness of the bids are detailed in Table B: TABLE B Checklist Item LD Anderson Hillcrest Contracting Cunningham - Davis 1 Bid Letter Yes Yes Yes 2 Schedule of Prices - Bid Amount (math check) - Bid Item Comparison - w/Eng's Est - w/other Bidders - Unbalanced Bid Items Yes' Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 3 Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes 4 List of Subcontractors - Prime Performs > 50% Work Yes Yes Yes 5 Bidder Information Forms - Reference Check Yes Yes2 Yes Yes2 Yes Yes2 6 Non -Collusion Affidavit Yes Yes Yes 7 Evidence of Insurance Yes No3 No3 Note: 1 A minor math error was found on Granitex's bid for Item No. 4. Granitex's bid is herein revised to $381,919.02 using the Unit Price as the basis for the Total Price of Item No. 4. Staff is currently researching references listed on bidder forms. Staff has verified that Bidder's license is current and active. Bidder did not submit evidence of insurance but staff is currently working with the bidder to obtain and verify that they either currently have or can obtain the insurance required prior to award of a construction contract with the Commission for the project. Item 7P ;O003 .7 Table .0 summarizes the costs associated with the Construction of an Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station for the three (3) lowest bids received: TABLE C (itemized breakdown of the lowest three (3) bids) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION Granitex Construction, Inc. Sean Malek Eng. & Construction, Inc. G.J. Cooke, Inc. 1 Mobilization $13,083.00 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 2 Sawcut and Demolish Platform Slab $4,761.60 $7,680.00 $15,360.00 3 Sawcut and Demolish Grade Beams 2'x2' $1,920.00 $4,800.00 $7,200.00 4 Point & Patch Finish, Cut Back Rebar $4,766.72 $6,080.00 $3,040.00 5 Remove Tactile Tiles on Existing Platform $1,681.92 $1,920.00 $9,984.00 6 Remove ADA Handrail $1,152.00 $1,920.00 $1,920.00 7 10' Light Standard on Steel Pole and Foundation $62,678.46 $78,000.00 $78,000.00 _ 8 Bollard Light, 70W HPS $7,509.60 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 9 Intercept and Connect to Existing Electrical Panel $1,359.60 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 10 Bore Utility Track Crossing $6,307.20 $6,000.00 $10,000.00 11 Place Electrical Conduits, Puliboxes, Wires $22,909.20 $36,000.00 $35,000.00 12 Steel Fence, 5' high M4,319.00 $47,400.00 $47,400.00 13 Steel Sliding Gate $2,520.00 $3,000.00 $2,200.00 14 Emergency Platform Extension $132,491.52 $79,500.00 $95,400.00 15 Tactile Tiles $23,419.20 $20,400.00 $35,700.00 16 Builder's All Risk Insurance $8,900.00 $5,000.00 $4,000.00 17 Railroad Protective Liability Insurance $2,600.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.00 18 UPRR Flagging $39,540.00 $39,540.00 $39,540.00 GRAND TOTAL $381,919.02 $388,240.00 $418,244.00 000318 " From staff's and legal counsel's review of the bids received, staff is recommending that the Commission award Agreement No. 03-33-009  For The Construction of the Emergency Platform Extension at the Pedley Metrolink Station Project - to Granitex Construction, Inc. for the amount of $381,919.02 plus a contingency amount of $38,080.98 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed amount of $420,000.00. The standard RCTC construction contract will be used, pursuant to legal counsel review. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y - Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $ 420,000 Source of Funds: Surface Transportation Program Funds (STP) Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 221-33-81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: v C- Date: 10/28/2002 000 9 - Item 7P AGENDA ITEM 7Q " " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM" " Plans and Programs Committee Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-25-032 with the Western Area Security Services for Guard Services for the North Main Corona Station PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve an amendment to the agreement (Agreement No. 03-25-032, Amendment No. 1 to RO No. 2161) with Western Area Security Services in an amount not to exceed $115,000 to include the addition of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station among the properties they. currently provide security services, pursuant to Legal Counsel review. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In March 2001, the Commission approved the selection of Western Area Security Services (WASS) to provide professional security guard services required by the Commission for the Riverside County Metrolink Stations. WASS has demonstrated their ability to clearly understand and implement the procedures and requirements of the Commission in providing the security services. In November 2002, with the completion of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station, two additional guards will be. necessary to provide adequate and appropriate levels of field supervision based on the arrival and departure times of the Metrolink Trains. One guard will be assigned to monitor passengers crossing tracks at the at -grade crossing. This guard will be certified by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway and have completed the Rail Safety Course offered by BNSF. The second guard will be assisting passengers with the ticket vending machines and patrolling parking lots and platform areas. The Compensation for all services rendered under the amendment will be at the rates set forth in the original Agreement. Except as noted by the Amendment, all provisions of the Agreement, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. Item 7Q 000320 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $115,000 Source of Funds: Rail Local Transportation Funds Budget Ad ustment: N GLA No.: 103-25-81006 P#4006 Fiscal Procedures Approved: v4 cM Date: 10/17/02 000321 " AGENDA ITEM 7R " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Karen Leland, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive. Director SUBJECT: Commuter Rail Program Update PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Riverside Line • • Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of September averaged 4,222 a 4% increase from the month of August. The Line has averaged an overall decrease of 8% from a year ago September 2001. September on -time performance averaged 96% inbound (1 % decrease from August) and 98% outbound (3% increase from August). Inland Empire -Orange County Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line for the month of September averaged 3,053, a 1% decrease from the month of August. The line has averaged an overall 4% increase from a year ago September 2001. September on -time performance averaged 94% inbound (2% increase from August) and 84% outbound (6% decrease from July). 91 Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of September averaged 1,546, a 12% increase from the month of August. Item 7R 000,322 September on -time performance averaged 89% inbound (2% decrease from August) and 92% outbound (2% increase from August). Special Trains Beach Train: The 2002 Beach Train has ended with record sales exceeding the 2001 season by more than 15%. October 6, the last train date, was one of three nine -car trains, and one that was a sell out at over 1,000 tickets. A detailed, year-end report will be included as a future agenda item. Rideshare 2 Rails (R2R) Program Rideshare ARAIL$ Rideshare Incentives: Current enrollment in the program is at 144 (Riverside -Downtown 46 Pedley 15, La Sierra 36, and West Corona 47), which frees up72 spaces for new riders. RTA Express Bus Shuttle: Ridership for the month of September again averaged 21 one-way trips per day, unchanged from the month of August. A passenger survey of Route 99 was conducted on October 9th. Ridership on this day was very low; therefore, information obtained to conduct data analysis may be minimal. Station Activities Metrolink 1Ot' Anniversary — Passenger Appreciation Day: In coordination with RCTC, Metrolink held a Passenger Appreciation Day at all Riverside County Metrolink stations on Monday, October 14th, from 4:00 — 8:00 pm. Passengers were greeted by Metrolink and RCTC staff, and were offered free giveaways provided by Metrolink (10th Anniversary pins, notepads, pencils, cupcakes, water, train schedules, etc.). Passengers were also invited to enter into a drawing for a free Metrolink monthly pass. In keeping with the spirit of the 10th Anniversary, 10 winners were selected: 4 from Riverside -Downtown, 2 each from Pedley, La Sierra and West Corona. The event was well -received by Metrolink passengers. RCTC Metrolink Station Daily Activities: Daily activities are recorded by station security guards. Attached is summary data covering first quarter FY 02-03 (July - September). Attachments: Metrolink Performance Summaries (September 2002) RCTC Metrolink Stations Daily Activity Report (1St Quarter — 02/03) 00' 323 36,000 4,000 2,000 ME'ALINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS 0,000 — 8,000 — 6,000 — 24,000 — 22,000 — 20,000 32,255 Sep -01 32,933 32,908 32,978 32,443 ''w'``. Oct -01 Nov -01 30,307 Dec -01 33,097 25 33,571 34,294 33,759 33,485 Jan -02 Feb -02 Mar -02 Apr -02 May -02 Jun -02 Jul -02 ®HolIda SAdJ--4--Unadj Av g Aug !'1V032S5 PERCENT PASSENGERS .ON -TIME •vs TRAINS ON -TIME * " " METROLINK ON -TIME PERFORMANCE Weekday Trains (Latest 13 Months) Sep 01 Oct 01 Nov 01 Dec 01 Jan 02 Feb 02 Mar 02 Apr 02 6% Arriving Within 5 -Minutes Of Scheduled Time I 00032 4 (1T_11C,Ant,lnw vt . SIG -Contractor 18% SCRRA 10 % Passenger 3% Includes Weekend Service % of Train Delays By Responsibility September 2002 TRK-Contracto[JPRR Vandalism 1% 3" 2% Other • 11% OP Agree Law-Enf 1% 5% Mechanical 10% Improv (SCRRA) 9% BNSF 27 % UPRR 16° TRK-Contractor 2% SIG -Contractor 8% SCRRA 10% Includes Weekend Service % of Train Delays By Responsibility 12 Month Period Ending. September 2002 Vandalism Mechanical 4% 12% Passenger 3% Other 9% OP Agree 1% 3% mprov (SCRRA) 3% BNSF 29% 00 2,8 PERFORMANCE CHARTS -BACK-UP 110111 METROLINK 6 000329 Sep 01 3,323 • METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED 5,463 9,503 435 4,566 5,940 2,923 102 Oct 01 3,558 5,170 10,032 452 4,651 Nov 01 3,500 5,169 10,025 477 4,654 Dec 01 3,144 4,898 9,391 452 4,223 5,867 5,939 5,369 3,081 3,007 2,733 122 137 97 Jan 02 3,566 4,813 10,086 480 4,596 5,865 2,930 107 Feb 02 Mar 02 3,612 3,650 5,031 5,135 10,235 10,082 464 518 4,635 4,615 5,882 5,931 Apr 02 3441 4913 10124 507 4524 5848 3,010 3,033 2791 109 133 109 32,255 32,933 32,908 30,307 32,443 32,978 33,097 32257 0% 2% 0% -8 % 7% 2% 0% -3 May 02 Jun 02 3,565 3,781 5,597 5,694 10,039 10,286 525 533 4,288 4,202 5,794 5,651 Jul 02 3,664 5,840 9,817 510 4,159 5,519 2,916 2,982 2,958 847 1165 1292 Aug 02 3,506 5,694 9,688 524 4,047 5,556 3,092 1378 Sep 02 % Change Sep 02 vs Aug 02 3,689 5,495 10,141 531 4,222 5,432 3,053 1546 33,571 34,294 33,759 33,485 4% 2% -2% -1% 34,109 2% L% Change Sep 02 ,vs Sep 01 5% -3% 5% 1% 4% -2% -1% 12%\ 2%, 11% 1% 7% 22% -8% -9% 4% 1416 % 6%I 000330 7 1 •New.xls " San Bernardino Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Av g Daily Riders 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Sep 01 Oct Nov Note: Sept Includes L.A. County Fair W dersi Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep -02 Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000- 2500 2000- 1500- 1000 - 500 - Sep 01 Oct Note: Sunday Service Began 06/25/00 San Bernardino Line Sunday Ser vice Average Daily Passenger Trips Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep -02 000332.- 9 Riverside Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep -02 Sep 01 Oct No te; Service Began June 24, 2000 - Service Discontinued January 19, 2002 000333 • 02 New.xls " METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SUMMARY Percentage of Trains Arriving Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time LATEST 13 MONTHS ., .Cefs Sep 01 , 99% ,�� 99% - ,4. . �+'S 99% 4 I�� 99 % . - �'r 99 % " �� f'" 98% } 100% "' 100% 91% r� - 87 % ,h' 88 % F,.. .,. 83 % 93% h ��1' .;: 92 % 3av r.. .r 4k d +:!?��.,. .,,> .; 89 % 95% 96% Oct01 100% 100% 99% 100% 99 % 98% 100% 100% 74% 80% 93% 94 % 92% 97% 83% 87% 95% 95% 96% 95% Nov 01 98% 100% 97% 97% 98% 97% 97% 100% 88% 92% 97% 88% 94% 98% 95% 95% 96% 96% 96% Dec01 98% 99% 98% 99% 98% 97% 98% 99% 91% 90% 91% 93 % 93% 93% 95% 92% 96% 96% Jan 02 98% 99% 99% 100% 97% 96% 100% 99% 91% 86% 97% 94% 92% 95% 73% 98% 96% 96% 96% Feb 02 98% 100% 97% 97% 97% 97% 99% 98% 95% 81% 91% 97% 90% 98% 85% 95% .. 95% 96% 96% Mar02 100% 99% 97% 94% 97% 97% 99% 100% 92% 94% 98% 96 % 95% 95% 8.6% 98% 97% 96% 96% Apr02 99% 100% 97% 93% 98% 95% 100 % 99 % 94% 98% 91% 96% 97% 94% 95% 95 % 96% 96% 97% May 02 99% 97% 98% 98% 97% 96% 100% 98% 96% 92% 89% 87% 87% 92 % 87% 83% 95% 96% 96% Jun 02 99% 98% 98% 99% 98% 96% 99% 97% 95 % 97% 93% 96% 94% 90% 95% 90% 97% 94% 94 % Jul 02 99% 99% 98% 95% 98% 99% 100% 99% 99 % 96% 91% 95% 93% 90% 92% 92% 97% 96% 96% Aug 02 100% 97% 99% 96% 96% 91% 100% 99% 97% 95% 89% 91% 92% 90% 91% 90% 96% 96 % 94% 96% 95% Sep 02 98% 99% 95% 94% 94% 91% 98% 98% 96% 98% 85% 92% 94% 84% 89% 92 % 94% 93% 94% ea lc Period Trains Arriving Within 5 Minutes of Schedu ed Time Peak Period Trains 99% 98% No adjustments have been made for relievable delays. Terminated trains are considered OT if they were on -time at point of termination. Annulled' trains are not included in the on -time calculation. 84% 89% 94 % 79% 88% 85% r 94 % 92% 93% 000354 11 CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS SEPTEMBER 2002 PRIMARY CAUSE OF TRAIN DELAYS GREATER THAN 5 MINUTES CAUSE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC INL/OC R/F/L TOTAL % of TOT Signals/Detectors 2 6 16 2 1 5 1 1 34 19% Slow Orders/MOW 0 6 4 0 0 4 2 0 16 9% Track/Switch 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 6 3% Dispatching 0 0 1 0 4 18 10 9 42 24 % Mechanical 1 1 7 2 1 4 2 0 18 10% Freight Train 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1% Amtrak Train 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 4 11 6% Metrolink Meet/Turn 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 2% Vandalism 0 0 3 0 0. 0 1 0 4 2% Passenger(s) 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 5 3% SCRRA Hold Policy 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1% Other 1 9 5 0 1 9 7 2 34 19% TOTAL 5 27 44 4 8 46 26 17 177 100% 000335 12 Saturday SNB 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 3 1 1 0 5 15 Saturday AVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 Sunday SNB. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 5 0209CAUS,xls • • " FREQUENCY OF TRAIN DELAYS BY DURATION SEPTEMBER 2002 MINUTES LATE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC IE/OC RIV/FUL TOTAL % of T OT NO DELAY 342 419 430 178 214 292 176 150 2201 81.1% 1 MIN - 5 MIN 52 35 125 19 18 42 35 12 338 12 .4 % 6 MIN - 10 MIN 1 7 21 0 3 15 9 5 61 2.2 % 11 MIN - 20 MIN 3 10 14 1 3 20 10 5 66 2.4% 21 MIN - 30 MIN 0 3 7 0 1 3 4 4 22 0.8% GREATER THAN 30 MIN 1 7 2 2 1 8 3 3 27 - 1.0% ANNULLED 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 7 0.3 % TOTAL TRAINS OPTD 399 481 599 200 240 380 237 179 2715 100% TRAINS DELAYED >0 min 57 62 169 22 26 88 61 29 514 18.9 % TRAINS DELAYED > 5 min 5 27 44 3 8 46 26 17 176 6.5% 000336 13 0209FREQ.xls " Daily Activity Report t 3.� f qr z,410 r,,;y Metrolink Stations Generated from 7/1/02 to 9/30/02 1 - Standard Procedures 1A - RCTC Staff on Site 18 - Customer Assistance 1C - Ambassador on Site Total 2 - Criminal Incidents 2A - Burglary / Theft / Vandalism 0 0 2 0 2 2D - Criminal Behavior 1 0 0 0 1 --------------------------------------------------- -- - - Riverside Pedley La Sierra W Corona Total 5 93 94 1 90 6 0 90 32 0 91 26 6 364 158 192 97 122 117 - 528 4 - Maintenance/Repairs 4A - Lights 15 2 0 2 19 4B - TVM / Validator Machine 20 13 12 14 59 4C - Elevator 3 0 3 2 8 4D - Station Cleaning 32 29 22 29 112 4D - Station Cleaning 0 1 0 0 1 4E - Landscaping 28 47 23 31 129 4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 8 26 17 14 65 4G - Pepsi Vending 5 3 3 3 14 4H - Other 19 0 19 26 64 Total 130 121 99 121 471 5 - Miscellaneous 5A - Miscellaneous Activity 37 14 30 11 92 6 - Parked Overnight 6A - Parked Overnight 7 - Overflow 7A - Veh. In Overflow 8 - Parking Citations 8A - Parking Citations 9 - Empty Spaces 9A - Empty Spaces Total Total Total Total Total 37 14 30 11 92 20 3 6 11 10 20 3 6 11 10 0 0 27 0 27 0 0 0 61 O 27 0 27 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 61 61 0 0 61 Thursday, October 17, 2002 0,0�p337' Daily Activity Report Metrolink Stations i stwprarn„r 'Generated from 7/1/02 to 9/30/02 Riverside Pedl y La Sierra W. Corona Total 91 - R2R Vehicles 91A - R2R Vehicles 4 2 3 4 3 Total 4 2 3 4 3 Thursday, October 17, 2002 0 0033;8j Riverside - Downtown Activity Detail Report Ge ner ated from 7/01/2002 to 9/30/2002 Date Time Activity L og # Description Activity Type 9/6/2002 1:30am 63076 10 gun shots heard by security by missions trains 2 - Criminal Incidents La Sierra Activity S ubtype # Vehicles 2D - Criminal Behavior 0 ate Time Activity Log # Description tion __.. .... ...... _.. .._.____. .... Activity Type Activity Sub e # Vehicles 7/22/2002 1700 _._._ ..... ._____._ ..__..----...... ._. _. _. _. 62456 Motorcycle stolen 2 - Criminal Incidents 2A - Burglary / Theft / Vandali 0 8/21/2002 62994 Rpt of vehicle theft @ Bowling Alley -no other info 2 - Criminal Incidents 2A - Burglary / Theft / Vandali 0 Thursday, October .17, 2002 Pagel ofl 000339 AGENDA ITEM 8 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: County of Riverside STIP Reprogramming Request PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to consider the Technical Advisory Committee's recommendation and take action on the County of Riverside's request to reprogram STIP Funds on Newport Road. to State Route 79. • • BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its September 11, 2002 meeting, the Commission adopted a resolution to prioritize improvements for. SR 79 and develop a funding strategy that would consider the allocation of future discretionary state and federal funding for widening SR 79 to six lanes. In addition, the resolution states that RCTC will work in cooperation with the County, Caltrans, and other government and private entities to expedite improvements to the area. A letter was also distributed at the meeting from Supervisor Venable regarding the status of the Newport Road STIP project. The letter stated that an Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Study (EIR/EIS) was being required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), with FHWA as lead agency for the EIS, and that it would take approximately five years to complete the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) process. The EIR/EIS requirement would push the construction schedule beyond the current STIP cycle to approximately the 2007/08 fiscal year. In order to expedite the Newport Road project, the County is requesting to remove $6 million of federal STIP funds off the project to allow a faster state -only CEQA process to be followed. The County will fund the project entirely with local funds through an established Road and Bridge Benefit District, which collects development fees to fund the Newport Road project. The County is also working with surrounding landowners to create a land secured financing district. The County is proposing to move the $6 million of STIP funds to the SR 79 (Domenigoni to Hunter) widening project since the SR 79 project. The SR 79 Item 8 Qq9,40 The County is proposing to move the $6 million of STIP funds to the SR 79 (Domenigoni to Hunter) widening project since the SR 79 project. The SR 79 project will widen the state highway from 2 to 4 lanes. The project is required to undergo federal processes since it is on the state highway system and has federal funds. The SR 79 project is currently programmed in the STIP and was approved by RCTC for additional 2002 STIP funding to cover the additional costs associated with the expanded limits in the environmental document. The $6 million is proposed to be used for the construction phase with construction scheduled to begin in 2004. The Newport Road STIP project was originally approved by RCTC under the 2000 STIP Discretionary call for projects as an earmark for 2002 STIP funds. Newport Road is currently programmed in the 2002 STIP in fiscal year 2004/05 for the construction phase. If the Commission approves the County's request, a STIP amendment would be submitted to the CTC for approval. The Commission action at the September meeting was to refer the County's reprogramming request to the RCTC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for a recommendation, and to bring this to the October 28th Plans and Programs Committee with a final recommendation forwarded to the Commission in November. The TAC discussed this request at their October 21, 2002 meeting. The TAC is recommending approval of the County's request to move the $6 million from Newport Road to SR 79 with the condition that the Newport Road project is funded by the Road and Bridge Benefit District and creation of a secured financing district by the surrounding landowners. The TAC based this recommendation on the fact that: • Newport Road project would still be implemented in a timely manner - construction scheduled to begin 2004 • SR 79 widening project is a regionally significant project that will also alleviate safety problems • the SR 79 project was approved by RCTC for 2002 STIP Discretionary funding for the expanded limits of the environmental document At the October 28, 2002 Plans and Programs Committee, the Committee approved the County's request and TAC recommendation with 9 ayes and 4 nays. 00 4i . " AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: November 13, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget & Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Program Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Highway and Commuter Rail Construction Program Update BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the attached Highway and Commuter Rail Construction Program Update as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1 - North Main Corona Metrolink Commuter Rail Station Construction Start Date: July 5, 2002 Scheduled Station "Operational" Completion Date (Rev): November 18, 2002 Scheduled Station Construction Complete Date: June 11, 2003 On June 12, 2002, the Commission awarded Contract No. 02-33-064 to Adams/Mallory Construction Co. for the construction of the North Main Corona Commuter Rail Station. The Contract required Adams/Mallory to construct the station to an "operational" status, Phase I, within 80 days after a Notice to Proceed was issued. Adams/Mallory second order of work, Phase II, was to complete all construction activities for the station within 231 days after the Notice to Proceed. Adams/Mallory was issued a Notice to Proceed on July 5, 2002. The original scheduled station "operational' completion date was October 25, 2002. Adams/Mallory will be unable to meet the "operational" station completion date, for reasons beyond their control, because of the following circumstances: I. At the start of excavation for the new track alignment, it was determined that an existing signal cable was located within the proposed track grading area. The start of station construction was delayed for one (1) week to allow BNSF time to relocate their signal cable out of the new track alignment. 11. During excavation for the new track alignment, over saturated soils were encountered, which required removal and replacement with stable materials. The cumulative effect on the project schedule, due to the removal and replacement of oversaturated soils, was a delay of approximately one (1) week. Item 9 00034 Iti. During excavation at the site, numerous man made buried objects were uncovered, including the remnants of a demolished building. - The cumulative effect on the project schedule, due to the removal of man made buried objects, was a delay of approximately one (1) week. IV. During excavation at the site, hydrocarbon contaminated soils were uncovered. The contaminated soils were excavated, removed from site, and treated. Also, an abandoned water well was uncovered. The well was required to be properly capped. Additional soils had to be imported, placed, and compacted to replace the removed contaminated soils. The cumulative effect on the project schedule, due to the removal of the contaminated soils, was a delay of approximately one (1) week Initially, staff had directed the contractor to work 10 hour days and weekends to recoup this lost time, but it was decided that it would be more cost effective to delay the initial "operational" date by three weeks in lieu of expending any more additional funds to maintain the original October 25, 2002 "operational" date. Therefore, the contractor is now on the revised schedule to have the station "operational" by November 18, 2002. 2 - West Corona/Riverside-La Sierra Metrolink Station CCTV Security System Construction Start Date: July 22, 2002 Construction Completion Date: November 14, 2002 On June 12, 2002, the Commission awarded Contract No. 02-33-063 to Lynch Communication, Inc. for the construction of a CCTV Security System for the West Corona and Riverside -La Sierra Stations and connection to the main monitoring facility located at the Riverside -Downtown Station. The contract required Lynch to complete construction within 80 days after a Notice to Proceed was issued. Lynch was issued a Notice to Proceed on July 22, 2002. Lynch is on schedule to complete construction on time. The following are the major issues that were encountered during construction: The start of construction of the Riverside -Downtown Parking Lot Expansion Project was delayed and several items of work had to be transferred to the CCTV Project. The deletion of scope from the Riverside -Downtown Parking Lot Expansion contract and the addition of scope to the CCTV project will require that funds be transferred between the two contracts. 3 — State Route 74, Segment 1, Dexter to Wasson Canyon Road Widen and Realignment Project Construction Start Date: September 16, 2002 Construction Completion Date: November 28, 2003 4000343 " " On July 10, 2002, the Commission awarded Contract No. 02-31-056 to Riverside Construction Co. for the construction of the SR 74, Segment 1, Dexter Avenue to - Wasson Canyon Road Highway Widening and Realignment Project. ` The Contract requires Riverside Construction to complete construction within 280 days after a Notice to Proceed was issued. Riverside Construction was issued a Notice to Proceed on September 16, 2002. Riverside Construction is on schedule to complete construction on time. No majors issues to date. 4 Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project Construction Start Date: October 8, 2002 Construction Completion Date: January 3, 2003 On July 10, 2002, the Commission awarded Contract No. 02-33-066 to L.D. Anderson, Inc. for the construction of the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project. This project will use RCTC's existing triangular property, directly north and adjacent to the Riverside -Downtown Station temporary parking area, across Vine Street, to construct approximately 125 additional parking spaces for the station. The contract requires L.D. Anderson to complete construction within 60 days after a Notice to Proceed was issued. L.D. Anderson _ was issued a Notice to Proceed on October 8, 2002. L.D. Anderson is on schedule to complete construction on time. No majors issues to date. 5 - Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase 1 Parking Lot Expansion Project Construction Start Date: October 21, 2002 Construction Completion Date: February 14, 2003 On September 11, 2002, the Commission . awarded Contract No. 03-33-026 to Riverside Construction, Inc. for the construction of the Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase 1 Parking Lot Expansion Project. The Phase 1 Parking Lot Expansion Project will provide an additional 254 parking spaces. The station currently has 343 parking spaces. The Phase 1 Parking Lot Expansion Project will bring the total number of spaces to 597. In conjunction with the expansion of the parking area, the City of Riverside Public Utilities has funded the construction of the Solar Panel Parking Stall Project with the construction of the Phase I Project. The Contract requires Riverside Construction to complete construction within 80 days after a Notice to Proceed was issued. Riverside Construction was issued a Notice to Proceed on October 21, 2002. Riverside Construction is on schedule to complete construction on time. No majors issues to date. Item 9 000344 CURRENT PROJECT LOCATIONS • G Route 60 Design and Construction of HOV lanes between East Junction 60/1-215 and Redlands Boulevard. Route 74 Dexter Avenue to just East of Wasson Canyon — first Segment of highway widening includes engineering, right of way acquisition, and construction. Route 79 Realignment between Ramona Expressway and East Valley. Reservoir —task will include development of Project Report and environmental studies. Route 79 Right tum lanes on Route 79 at Gilman Springs Road. Route 91 Phase I1 soundwall landscaping and plant establishment. Auxiliary lane construction between. Magnolia and Mary Streets to be funded by Caltrans. Route 91 Preliminary engineering and Environmental for HOV lanes from Mary Street to 7th Street. Routelll Intersection improvements San Luis Rey construction, El Paseo/Cabrillo construction, Town Center to El Paseo construction, Monterey Ave. construction completion (City of Palm Desert). 000345 San. Jacinto Branch Line Complete Alternative Analysis and begin Preliminary engineering on Segment 1 from . Riverside to Romoland. • Pedley Station Security system design and installation. Construction of station emergency platform. O La Sierra rail station Complete station construction. Purchase of right of way and parking lot expansion for Phase I and Phase II. • North Main Corona Station Construction of new station and parking lot. • Downtown Riverside Station Completion of parking lot expansion.