Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
07 July 10, 2002 Commission
" R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N w w w . r c t c . o r g A G E N D A * * A c t i o n s m a y b e t a k e n o n a n y i t e m l i s t e d o n t h e a g e n d a 9 : 0 0 a . m . W e d n e s d a y , J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 C O N F E R E N C E R O O M U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a @ R i v e r s i d e , U n i v e r s i t y V i l l a g e 1 2 0 1 U n i v e r s i t y A v e n u e , R o o m 2 0 7 , R i v e r s i d e 1 . C A L L T O O R D E R 2 . R O L L C A L L 3 . P U B L I C C O M M E N T S 4 . A P P R O V A L O F M I N U T E S 5 . P U B L I C H E A R I N G A P P R O V A L A N D A D O P T I O N . O F R E L O C A T I O N P L A N F O R S T A T E R O U T E 7 4 R E A L I G N M E N T A N D W I D E N I N G P R O J E C T , S E G M E N T 2 P a g e 1 O v e r v i e w T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) C o n d u c t a h e a r i n g t o c o n s i d e r t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e p r o p o s e d R e l o c a t i o n P l a n f o r S R 7 4 R e a l i g n m e n t a n d W i d e n i n g P r o j e c t , S e g m e n t 2 ( R e l o c a t i o n P l a n ) ; i n c l u d i n g p r o v i d i n g a l l i n t e r e s t e d p a r t i e s o f a f f e c t e d r e s i d e n c e s a n d / o r b u s i n e s s e s , t h e i r a t t o r n e y s , o r t h e i r r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s a n o p p o r t u n i t y t o - b e h e a r d o n t h e i s s u e s r e l e v a n t t o t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n ; a n d , 2 ) A p p r o v e a n d a d o p t t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n . Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 2 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.) 7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month of May 31, 2002. Page 61 7B. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 03-19-007 WITH PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR INVESTMENT ADVISOR SERVICES Page 65 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-19-007 with Public Financial Management for investment advisor services in an amount not to exceed $25,000; and, 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7C. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Page 72 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 3 • 7D. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR RCTC/SANBAG SHARED STATE AND FEDERAL ADVOCATES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 78 1) Approve the release of two Requests for Proposals (RFP) to be provided from November 2002 to November 2006; a) State advocacy services (SANBAG RFP No. 03-008): b) Federal advocacy services (SANBAG RFP No. 03- 007); and, 2) Authorize the Chairman and 1St Vice -Chairman to participate as voting members of the selection committee. 7E. FISCAL YEAR 2003 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5307 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS Page 94 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307 Program of Projects for Riverside County for FY 03. 7F. LOCAL GUIDELINES UPDATE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 03-005, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING AND ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PUB. RESOURCES CODE §§ 21000 ET SEQ.)" Page 99 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the update to the Commission's local guidelines for implementing CEQA; and, 2) Adopt Resolution No. 03-005, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending and Adopting Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code §§ 21000 Et Seq.) ". Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 4 7G. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY'S REQUEST TO AMEND FISCAL YEAR 2003 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND ALLOCATE FUNDS FOR MARKETING OF THE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROGRAM AND THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY Page 195 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Amend Riverside Transit Agency's FY 03 Short Range Transit Plan; and, 2) Allocate $2,057,925 in Local Transportation Funds for the Purchase of Real Property ($1,062,000) and marketing of the Bus Rapid Transit program ($995,925). 7H. RESOLUTION NO. 03-001, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASS/STANCE FUNDS" AND FISCAL YEAR 2003 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE ALLOCATIONS Page 198 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 03-001, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds"; and, 2) Approve the FY 03 State Transit Assistance Fund allocations in Riverside County as presented in the agenda packet. 71. FISCAL YEAR 2003 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND ALLOCATIONS FOR TRANSIT Page 203 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 03 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for transit as presented in the agenda packet. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 5 7J. NEW COMMUTER RAIL SERVICES UPDATE Page 206 Overview • This item is for the Commission to receive and file the New Commuter Rail Services Update as an information item. 7K. COMMUTER RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 7L. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY Overview Page 213 Page 229 This item is for the Commission to grant the City of Cathedral City a nine -month extension to February 28, 2003, to complete the Downtown Pedestrian Bridge project. 7M. FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Page 232 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 02-03 SB 821 Bicycle and Facilities Program recommended funding as presented in the agenda packet. 7N. DEMONSTRATION EXPRESS BUS SERVICE ON STATE ROUTE 91 Page 240 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Support the implementation of two demonstration express bus routes on the SR 91 corridor; and, 2) Allocate up to $400,000 in Measure "A" Specialized Transportation - Commuter Assistance Program funds. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 6 70. UPDATE ON THE ZERO EMISSION MOBILE INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT (ZEMIE) PROJECT Page 244 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve re-scoping of the Zero Emission Mobile Industrial Equipment project to meet Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality eligibility requirements. 7P. FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 REGIONAL RIDESHARE CONTRACT, AGREEMENT NO. 03-41-008 WITH SCAG/SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RIDESHARE Page 247 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Direct staff to negotiate a contract with SCAG/Southern California Rideshare for Regional Rideshare Services in an amount not to exceed $35,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission 7Q. AGREEMENT NO. 03-41-001 WITH ADVANCED DATA TRANSCRIBING CENTER, INC. FOR DATA ENTRY SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Page 250 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-41-001 with Advanced Data Transcribing Center, Inc. for data entry services to support the Commuter Assistance Program and implementation of ridematching services in an amount not to exceed $45,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 7 • • 7R. STATE ROUTE 79 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-006 BETWEEN RCTC AND CALTRANS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 265 1) Approve Cooperative Agreement No. 03-31-006 with Caltrans for the development of the SR 79 Project Report and Environmental Document (Caltrans Agreement Number 8-1 185); and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7S. AGREEMENT NO. 03-31-005 WITH DMJM + HARRIS FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE STATE ROUTE 60 HOV PROJECT FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES Page 273 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-31-005 (Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No. RO-2042) with DMJM + Harris to provide engineering design services for the SR 60 HOV Project Final Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E), for an additional base amount of $282,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 8 7T. AGREEMENT NO. 03-33-003 WITH ENGINEERING RESOURCES FOR RIVERSIDE -LA SIERRA METROLINK STATION PHASE II PARKING LOT EXPANSION AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS Page 308 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-33-003 (Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 02-33-029) with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. to provide additional final PS&E design services for Phase II expansion of the parking lot at the existing Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink station, for an additional base amount of $114,705; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize staff to advertise bids for the construction of the Riverside -La Sierra Station Phase II Parking Lot Expansion; and, 4) Bring back to the Commission the results of the bidding for contract award to the lowest, responsive bidder. 7U. FISCAL YEARS 2003-2007 MEASURE "A" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS Page 318 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 03-07 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads. 7V. AMENDMENT TO FISCAL YEAR 2002 MEASURE "A" CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITIES OF MORENO VALLEY AND PALM DESERT Page 431 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the FY 02 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the County of Riverside and the Cities of Moreno Valley and Palm Desert as presented in the agenda packet. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 9 • • • 7W. BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Overview This item is for the Commission to approve: Page 477 1) The increase for the Coachella Valley Highway Budget; and, 2) The increase for the Coachella Valley Specialized Transit Operating Budget. 7X. AGREEMENT NO. 03-25-004 WITH JEFFERSON TRANSITIONAL PROGRAMS FOR CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FOUR METROLINK STATIONS IN RIVERSIDE AND AGREEMENT NO. 03- 25-902 WITH DLS LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT FOR CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FUTURE NORTH MAIN CORONA STATION Page 478 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 03-25-004, three-year contract with two one-year options, to Jefferson Transitional Programs to provide the cleaning and maintenance for the four current Metrolink Station in Riverside County; Riverside Downtown, La Sierra, West Corona, and Pedley Stations in the amount of $ 70,370.64; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Approve Agreement No. 03-25-902 with DLS Landscape/Irrigation Management to provide the cleaning and maintenance for the future North Main Corona; 4) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute a one-year agreement with two two-year options, with DLS Landscape/Irrigation Management once the North Main Corona Station has been constructed; and, 5) Authorize staff to seek proposals for quarterly street sweeping of the four existing stations and include the North Main Station once constructed. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 10 7Y. SURPLUS PROPERTY Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 480 1) Declare the property identified in the report as surplus; and, 2) Authorize the Executive Director to initiate the sixty (60) day public agency notification period and, if no interest is expressed, offer the parcels for sale. 8. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-066 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIVERSIDE -DOWNTOWN METROLINK STATION PARKING LOT EXPANSION PROJECT Page 484 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Direct staff to present its award recommendations to the Commission for Agreement No. 02-33-066 for the construction of the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9. AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-056 FOR THE REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING OF STATE ROUTE 74 FROM DEXTER AVENUE TO 0.5 KM EAST OF WASSON CANYON ROAD Page 485 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Present its award ` recommendations to the Commission for Agreement No. 02-31-056 for the realignment and widening of the existing State Route 74, Segment 1, from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km east of Wasson Canyon Road; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 11 • • 10. REVISED CETAP INTERNAL CORRIDORS BUDGET Page 486 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the revised CETAP Internal Corridors budget which increased from $5,928,248 to $8,126,449 resulting in a total CETAP budget of $14,532,764. 11. LIMITED RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE A TRANSIT VILLAGE CONCEPT FOR DEVELOPMENT AT THE RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN METROLINK STATION Page 490 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to negotiate and enter into Limited Right to Negotiate Agreement No. 03-50-901 for a Transit Village Concept for Development on Commission Owned Land at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station Site with the City of Riverside Redevelopment Agency, Creative Housing Associates and John C. Petry; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. 12. PRESENTATION - SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE PROJECT Page 509 Overview This item is for the Commission to appoint a San Jacinto Branch Line Ad Hoc Committee that will convene to provide guidance on key policy issues related to the upgrade of the Line, station Locations, and funding issues for the extension of Metrolink commuter rail service from the Riverside -Downtown Station to Perris, with a layover facility in the unincorporated area of Romoland. 13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 14. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended and upcoming meetings/conferences and issues related to Commission activities. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 12 15. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(b) Significant exposure to litigation to subdivision (b): Number of potential cases: 1 B. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54956.8 Negotiating Parties: RCTC — Executive Director or Designee Property Owner — MLM Properties C. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54956.8 Negotiating Parties: RCTC — Executive Director or Designee Property Owners - See Following List of Property Owners SR 74 RIGHT-OF-WAY Item APN Owner 1 349-080-002 Lynn Gritton, et.al. 2 342-072-001 Anthony J. Moreci, et.ux. 3 342-061-007 Marian E. Frederick 4 342-100-011 Vincent Graves 5 345-080-046 Luis Briseno, et.al. 6 345-220-005 Raymond Rasmussen, et.ux. 7 345-220-061 Shapleigh Kimes, et.ux 8 342-120-016 Andrew Boji 9 342-120-012 Raul A. & Alvaro Ramirez 10 342-210-031 Alfonso Siordia, et.ux. 11 342-210-028 Norma D. Ryder, et.al. 12 342-120-014 Mary E. Corrado 13 342-120-015 Osby C. Blair, et.ux. 14 342-240-013 Todd A. Griffith, C.R. & Arlene Griffith 15 342-240-014 Todd A. Griffith, C.R. & Arlene Griffith 16 342-240-015 Todd A. Griffith, C.R. & Arlene Griffith 17 342-210-024 Arthuro J. Gaivan 18 342-200-036 Neil G. Peak, et.al. 19 342-072-006 Martha P. Villalobos, et.al. 20 342-072-008 Elijah Lewis, et.ux. 21 342-072-010 Earl Jones, Trustee 22 342-072-011 Richard Atencio, et.al. 23 326-250-026 Joe L. & Vera I. Williams Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 10, 2002 Page 13 • • • 24 349-124-005 Edwin Borsheim Gallagher 25 349-124-004 Re/Max of the Lakes 26 349-124-003 Larry Roberts 27 349-124-021 General Telephone Company of California 28 349-124-001 La Verne Biniaz, et.al. 29 349-342-013 Ironclad, LLC 30 349-342-012 Seletha G. Huff 31 349-342-01 1 J. Kirk Harns 16. ADJOURNMENT The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, September 11, 2002, Conference Room, University of California @ Riverside, University Village, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside. AGENDA ITEM 4 Minutes " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S W e d n e s d a y , J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 1 . C A L L T O O R D E R T h e m e e t i n g o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n w a s c a l l e d t o o r d e r b y C h a i r m a n J o h n T a v a g l i o n e a t 9 : 0 4 a . m . , i n t h e C o n f e r e n c e R o o m a t U n i v e r s i t y V i l l a g e , R o o m 2 0 7 , 1 2 0 1 U n i v e r s i t y A v e n u e , R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a , 9 2 5 0 1 . 2 . R O L L C A L L C o m m i s s i o n e r s / A l t e r n a t e s P r e s e n t D a r y l B u s c h B o b B u s t e r C h r i s B u y d o s J u a n D e L a r a F r a n k H a l l G . D a n a H o b a r t J o h n H u n t D i c k K e l l y R o b i n L o w e A m e a l M o o r e T o m M u l l e n J o h n J . P e n a G r e g o r y S . P e t t i s R o n R o b e r t s J a n i c e R u d m a n G r e g R u p p e r t R o b e r t S c h i f f n e r J o h n F . T a v a g l i o n e A l f r e d W . T r e m b l y P l a c i d o L . V a l d i v i a J a m e s A . V e n a b l e F r a n k W e s t M i k e W i l s o n R o y W i l s o n J o n W i n n i n g h a m C o m m i s s i o n e r s A b s e n t P e r c y B y r d R o b e r t C r a i n A n n e M a y e r W i l l i a m G . K l e i n d i e n s t J a c k v a n H a a s t e r Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 2 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Alicia Smith, South Coast Air Quality Management District, presented herself as the Commission's new representative. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - May 8, 2002 M/S/C (Hunt/Buydos) to approve the May 8, 2002 minutes as amended reflecting the presence of Commissioner Mike Wilson at the meeting. 5. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 Ivan Chand, Chief Financial Officer, reviewed the modifications made to the proposed budget presented at the Commission's May 8th meeting. At this time Chairman Tavaglione opened the public hearing. There being no comments, requests to speak, or written material on this matter, the Chair declared the public hearing closed. There were no questions from the Commissioners. M/S/C (Mullen/Lowe) to adopt the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. 6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board, noted updates to the following agenda items: A. Agenda Item 8, "Agreement No. 02-33-063 for Construction of a Security System at the Riverside -La Sierra and West Corona Metrolink Stations". B. Agenda item 9, "Agreement No. 02-33-064 for Construction of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station". • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 3 • 7 • • CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (M. Wilson/Hall) to approve the following Consent Calendar items: 7A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Receive and . file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending April 30, 2002. 7B. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT STATEMENTS Receive and file the quarterly investment statements for the period ending March 31, 2002. 7C. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Adopt the following bill positions: Oppose - SB 1213 (Alpert, D -Coronado) as amended 4/10/02 Support - SCA 11 (Murray, D -Los Angeles) as introduced 2/21/02; and, 2) Receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Update as an information item. 7D. FISCAL YEAR 2003 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION'S SECTION 5311 RURAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM Approve the proposed FY 03 Federal Transit Administration's Section 5311 Program of Projects for Riverside County. 7E. REVISED LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (LTF) APPORTIONMENT Adopt the revised LTF apportionment. 7F. SCAG 2002 RTIP ADOPTION PROCESS Receive and file a report on SCAG's 2002 RTIP Adoption Process. 7G. EXECUTION OF WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SECTION 10(a) PERMIT Authorize execution of the Section 10(a) Permit Application. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 4 • 7H. CITY OF COACHELLA AVENUE 50 GRADE SEPARATION CPUC SECTION 190 10% LOCAL MATCH REQUEST 1) Transfer $500,000 of uncommitted Surface Transportation Program Funds to the Rail Program to facilitate the award of funding for the Avenue 50 Grade Separation Project; and, 2) Allocate $500,000 in available Rail Local Transportation Funds to provide a non-federal match to the City of Coachella for the Avenue 50 Grade Separation Project. 71. AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-078 (AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-2042) WITH DMJM+HARRIS FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE STATE ROUTE 60 HOV PROJECT PS&E 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-31-078 (Amendment No. 6 to Agreement RO-2042) with DMJM + Harris to provide additional Engineering Design Services for the SR 60 HOV Project PS&E, for an additional base amount of $248,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7J. AGREEMENT NO. 02-31-079 (AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-9954), WITH SC ENGINEERING FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES TO THE STATE ROUTE 74 WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN 1-15 IN LAKE ELSINORE AND 7TH STREET IN THE CITY OF PERRIS 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-31-079 (Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. RO-9954) with SC Engineering for additional Engineering Design Services to complete the PS&E for SR 74 widening project between 1-15 in Lake Elsinore and 7th Street in the City of Perris, for an additional base amount of $265,902 and an additional contingency of $26,500, for a total not to exceed amount of $292,402; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 5 • • 7K. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-074 (AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-9833) WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR ADDITIONAL ON -CALL SURVEYING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF MEASURE "A" CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-33-074 (Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. RO-9833) with the County of Riverside to provide additional on -call surveying services in support of Measure "A" projects scheduled for construction this upcoming fiscal year, for an additional base amount of $87,035.39 and an additional contingency of $22,964.61, for a total not to exceed amount of $110,000.00; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-075 (AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-2027) WITH DMJM + HARRIS FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK STATION 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-33-075 (Amendment No. 5, RO 2027) with DMJM + Harris to develop a Conceptual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and to provide engineering support for the construction of the North Main Corona Metrolink Station, for an additional base amount of $59,328.49; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7M. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-077 (AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-9832) WITH NINYO & MOORE FOR ADDITIONAL ON -CALL MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF MEASURE "A" CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1) Approve Agreement No. 02-33-077 (Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. RO-9832) with Ninyo & Moore to provide additional on -call material testing services in support of Measure "A" Projects scheduled for construction this upcoming fiscal year, for an additional base amount of $177,100 and an additional contingency of $17,710, for a total not to exceed amount of $194,810.00; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 6 • 7N. PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY UNMET NEEDS HEARING TESTIMONY AND RESPONSES, AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-108, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADOPTING A FINDING THAT THERE ARE NO UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS THAT ARE REASONABLE TO MEET IN THE PALO VERDE VALLEY AREA" Reaffirm the Commission's definition of "Unmet Transit Needs" and "Reasonable to Meet" standards; and, Adopt Resolution No. 02-108, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting a Finding That There Are No Unmet Transit Needs That Are Reasonable to Meet In The Palo Verde Valley Area". 70. FISCAL YEAR 2003 MINIMUM FARE REVENUE RATIO FOR THE RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY AND SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 1) Approve the FY 03 minimum fare revenue to operating expense ratio of 18.41 % for the Riverside Transit Agency and 16.21 % for SunLine Transit Agency; 2) Reaffirm the methodology used to calculate the required ratio; and, 3) Request Caltrans' concurrence with the methodology and ratios for FY 03. 7P. FISCAL YEARS 2003 AND2004 SPECIALIZED TRANSIT TWO-YEAR CALL FOR PROJECTS 1) Approve the requests for Measure "A" Specialized Transit funds available in Western Riverside County for Care -A -Van Transit, Corona -Norco Family YMCA, Friends of Moreno Valley Senior Center, Inland Aids Project, Riverside County Housing Authority, and Volunteer Center; 2) Authorize staff to work with Anza Valley Community Services, Partnership to Preserve Independent Living, and Transportation Specialists to resolve issue of matching funds and operating budgets, authorizing interim payment based on FY 02's funding agreement covering the months of July through September; and, 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to enter into the funding agreements. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 7 7Q. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-019, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING GUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE MEASURE "A" FUNDED COMMUTER INCENTIVE PROJECTS AS PART OF ITS COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM" Approve Resolution No. 02-019, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending Guidelines for the Administration of the Measure "A" Funded Commuter Incentive Project as Part of Its Commuter Assistance Program' 7R. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT NO. 02-41-069, SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CONTRACT 1) Enter into a contract with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) as part of the Commission's continuing bi-county partnership with SANBAG to deliver commuter and employer rideshare services for FY 02-03; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement. 7S. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM EXTENSION FOR THE CITIES OF PERRIS, RIVERSIDE, AND SAN JACINTO, AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1) Grant the City of Perris a three-month extension to September 30, 2002 to complete the San Jacinto and Diana Street sidewalk project; 2) Grant the City of Riverside a nine -month extension to March 31, 2003 to complete the California Avenue and Cridge Street sidewalk projects; 3) Grant the City of San Jacinto a six-month extension to December 31, 2002 to complete the Ramona Boulevard sidewalk project; and, 4) Grant the County of Riverside a six-month extension to December 31, 2002 to complete the Coahuilla Street walkway project. • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 8 7T. AMENDMENT TO COMMUNICATIONS SITE LEASES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (RC SAFE) 1) Amend the Communications Site leases between the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7U. AMENDMENT TO FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. 02-45-040, BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES 1) Amend Funding Agreement No. 02-45-040 with the Department of California Highway Patrol to provide overtime supervision and operation of the Freeway Service Patrol Program in Riverside County; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 7V. COMMUTER RAIL UPDATE Receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. 8. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-063 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SECURITY SYSTEM AT THE RIVERSIDE -LA SIERRA AND WEST CORONA METROLINK STATIONS Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director, reviewed the scope of work and contractor selection for construction of a security system at the Riverside -La Sierra and West Corona Metrolink Stations. M/S/C (Lowe/Mullen) to: 1) Award Agreement No. 02-33-063 to Lynch Communication, Inc. for construction of a security system at the Riverside -La Sierra and West Corona Stations and connection to the Downtown Riverside Station for the amount of $139,900, plus a contingency amount of $40,100 to cover potential change • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 9 order encountered during construction, for a total amount not to exceed $180,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 9. AGREEMENT NO. 02-33-064 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTH MAIN CORONA METROLINK STATION Hideo Sugita reviewed the scope of work and contractor selection for construction of the North Main Corona Metrolink. M/S/C (Rudman/Roberts) to: 1) Approve increasing the construction budget for the Corona Main Station by $2,402,200 using Measure "A" rail funds for a total of $14,561,000; 2) Award Agreement No. 02-33-064 to Adams / Mallory Construction Co. Inc. for construction of the new North Main Corona Metrolink Commuter Rail Station and Pedestrian Overcrossing in the amount of $7,680,439, plus a contingency amount of $769,561 to cover potential change order encountered during construction, for a total amount not to exceed amount of $8,450,000; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. No: Lowe 10. FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2005 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN M/S/C (Mullen/Lowe) to approve, in concept, the FY 03-05 Short Range Transit Plans for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Riverside, Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency, Riverside Transit Agency, SunLine Transit Agency and RCTC's Regional Rail, as presented. 11. RCIP UPDATE AND CETAP PUBLIC HEARINGS M/S/C (Mullen/Lowe) to: 1) Receive and file the RCIP update; and, 2) Direct staff to schedule two public hearings on the Draft Environmental Documents for the internal CETAP corridors. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 10 12. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR No items were pulled from the agenda for discussion. 13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR A. Commissioner Ron Roberts reported on the APTA Commuter Rail Conference in Baltimore, Maryland. He noted that discussions included considerable interest in high-speed rail and MAGLEV. He was a member of a panel for a mock start-up committee for a Commuter Rail Board of Directors. Commissioner Frank Hall extended invitations to those present to attend the 11th Annual WRCOG General Assembly at the Riverside Convention Center, Thursday, June 13th. C. Eric Haley, Executive Director, provided an update on: a) the success of the new 91 Line; b) the La Sierra Station Plan for Expansion approval by the Riverside City Council on June 11th; c) Measure "A" extension efforts including an endorsement from the Auto Club of Southern California and presentations to the Corona Chamber of Commerce and Riverside City Council; and, d) the progress on the Orange County Corridor. D. Commissioner Tom Mullen asked for an update on the parking situation at the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station and Eric Haley responded that there is a daily average of 10-25 available spaces out of 738. Staff is moving forward to construct a temporary parking lot of 110 spaces at Vine Street and is in final discussions to acquire land to provide another 400-500 spaces. Commissioner Robin Lowe requested information on the upcoming press conference with Assemblymember Dennis Hollingsworth regarding funding for SR 79. Commissioner Venable responded that Assemblymember Hollingsworth has taken the lead to obtain funding for the widening of SR 79 from Winchester Road to the French Valley Airport as a county financed project. He will inform Commissioner Lowe of future meetings. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 11 • • • Eric Haley added that the Commission should also be informed of any funding sources committed to the SR 79 realignment project. 14. CLOSED SESSION ITEM A. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54946.8 Negotiating Parties: RCTC - Executive Director or Designee Property Owners: See Following List of Property Owners Right -Of -Way Acquisitions Item APN Grantor 1 347-130-018 Bill E. & Rae Jean Long 2 349-060-029 Kimber L. Lawson 3 349-341-001 Luz Sepulveda, et. al. 4 345-150-005 Jose Ramirez, et. ux. 5 345-150-006 Deirdre Gough, Trustee 6 345-150-029 Joe and Rosa Ponce 7 345-060-041 Arrebelle Allison 8 342-210-031 Alfonso Siordia, et. ux. 9 342-210-034 Richard M. O'Grattis 10 342-120-015 Osby C. Blair, et. ux. 11 342-150-013 James Varner, et. ux. 12 342-100-048 Goodhope Missionary Baptist Church 13 342-051-001 Webster L. Carter, et. ux. 14 342-052-009 Kim Quaid 15 342-052-010 Jeffrey Harris 16 342-064-021 Miguel Medina Gomez, et. ux. 17 326-250-010 George Delgado 18 326-240-031 lanthe M. Roberson Bentley 19 326-240-021 Leopoldina Molina 20 326-240-052 Michael B. Martin, et. ux. 21 342-064-011 Joseph Banks, et. ux. 22 342-130-002 Alexander Paul, et.ux. 23 342-061-002 Angel Lorenzo Gasparini, et.ux. 24 349-342-004 Dao Anh Hoa 25 349-080-002 Lynn Gritton, et. al. 26 345-220-061 Shapleigh Kimes, et. ux. 27 345-220-005 Raymond Rasmussen, et. ux. 28 345-070-009 Annie Hayes 29 345-070-012 Ruth L. Maciel 30 345-080-046 Luis Briseno, et. al Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 12 31 342-210-035 Lake Elsinore Bible Fel. Ministries 32 342-120-016 Andrew Boji 33 342-130-003 Julia Saldana 34 342-140-010 Frederick Marian Ellen 35 342-100-011 Vincent Graves 36 342-051-008 Webster L. Carter, et. ux. 37 342-052-013 Vernon W. James, et. ux. 38 342-051-013 Larry T. Payne 39 349-060-022 Patricia K. Johnson 40 349-060-009 James A. Gonzales 41 349-050-025 James A. & Estela L. Gonzales 42 342-150-005 Doris E. Jonas 43 342-072-001 Anthony J. Moreci, et. ux. 44 326-240-024 Ethel May Hatcher 45 326-240-074 Wendell E. Venerable, Trustee 46 349-124-003 Larry Roberts 47 349-342-012 Seletha G. Huff 48 345-080-047 John Silas, et. ux. 49 349-080-003 Lynn Gritton, et. al. 50 349-080-001 Lynn Gritton, et. al. 51 349-080-035 Stanley Hanover, et. ux. 52 342-210-017 Robert Esparza Sanches, et. ux. 53 342-210-013 C. R. & Arlene Griffith, Tr. 54 342-210-028 Norma D. Ryder, et. al. 55 342-120-012 Raul A. & Alvaro Ramirez 56 342-052-018 Patrick Lavey, et. ux. 57 342-052-019 Donald R. Johnson Sr., et. al. 58 349-100-037 Arturo. Mendoza, et. al. B. Conference with Legal Counsel Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section 54956.9(a) Significant exposure to litigation to subdivision (b): Number of potential cases: 1 There were no announcements on the Closed Session items. • • Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 12, 2002 Page 13 • 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:37 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., on Wednesday, July 10, 2002, in the Conference Room, University Village, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, California, 92501. Respectfully submitted, Naty Kob(enha Clerk of the Board • AGENDA ITEM 5 Public Hearing RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Brian Cundelan, Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval and Adoption of Relocation Plan for State Route Realignment and Widening Project, Segment 2 74 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a hearing to consider the approval of the proposed Relocation Plan for SR 74 Realignment and Widening Project, Segment 2 (Relocation Plan); including providing all interested parties of affected residences and/or businesses, their attorneys, or their representatives an opportunity to be heard on the issues relevant to the Relocation Plan; and, 2) Approve and adopt the Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The SR 74 Realignment and Widening Project (Project) is a Measure "A" project from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to 7th Street in Perris. The Project will be constructed in two segments. Segment 1 is from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to approximately 1,640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road. Segment 2 is from approximately 1,640 feet east of Wasson Canyon Road to 7th Street in Perris. The Relocation Plan addresses Segment 2. One aspect of the acquisition of real property for the Project will require the displacement of residential and non-residential occupants. The proposed acquisition may cause the permanent displacement of thirty-nine (39) residential households and forty-five (45) non-residential occupants. Relocation assistance services are required to be provided to the potential displaced occupants. In order to evaluate the present housing and business circumstances, and re -housing and replacement site requirements of potential Project displacees, a Relocation Plan has been prepared. Item 5 0aOo0- €x An experienced relocation firm has prepared the Relocation Plan and is currently working with the occupants to determine their needs and provide them all necessary information regarding the process. Notices were sent to all potential displacees on June 7, 2002 informing them that (1) a Public Hearing would be convened on July 10, 2002, (2) the Relocation Plan is available for review at the RCTC office and the libraries in Lake Elsinore and Perris, and (3) comments would be accepted until noon on July 9, 2002. RULES AND REGULATIONS Funding for the Project is from local, state and federal sources. Therefore, the Relocation Plan and subsequent relocation assistance for the Project will be in accordance with the provisions of the California Relocation Assistance Law, California Government Code, Section 7260 et.seq. and the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Chapter 6; as well as, the Uniform Relocation Act (46 U.S.C. § 4600 et seq.), its implementing regulations (49 C.F.R. Part 24) and other requirements and regulations applicable under federal law. PROGRAM ASSURANCES, STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVES Pursuant to the above Rules and Regulations, program objectives will be as follows: 1. To fully inform eligible project occupants of the nature of, and procedures for obtaining relocation assistance and benefits. 2. To determine the needs of each residential displacee eligible for assistance. 3. To provide an adequate number of referrals to comparable, decent, safe and sanitary housing units within a reasonable time prior to displacement and assure that no residential occupant is required to move without a minimum of 90 days written notice to vacate. 4. To provide current and continuously updated information concerning replacement housing opportunities. 5. To provide assistance that does not result in different, or separate treatment due to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or other arbitrary circumstances. 6. To supply information concerning federal and state housing programs and other governmental programs providing assistance to displaced persons. • • Item: 5 000002`` " " " 7 . T o a s s i s t e a c h e l i g i b l e p e r s o n t o c o m p l e t e a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r b e n e f i t s . 8 . T o m a k e r e l o c a t i o n b e n e f i t p a y m e n t s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l g u i d e l i n e s , a s a p p l i c a b l e , i n c l u d i n g t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e L a s t R e s o r t H o u s i n g s e c t i o n s w h e r e a p p l i c a b l e . 9 . T o i n f o r m a l l p e r s o n s s u b j e c t t o d i s p l a c e m e n t o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s p o l i c i e s w i t h r e g a r d t o e v i c t i o n a n d p r o p e r t y m a n a g e m e n t . 1 0 . T o m a i n t a i n a f o r m a l g r i e v a n c e p r o c e d u r e f o r u s e b y d i s p l a c e d p e r s o n s s e e k i n g a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e v i e w o f C o m m i s s i o n d e c i s i o n s w i t h r e s p e c t t o r e l o c a t i o n a s s i s t a n c e . P U B L I C I N F O R M A T I O N T h e C o m m i s s i o n w i l l e n s u r e t h e f o l l o w i n g : 1 . F u l l a n d t i m e l y a c c e s s t o a l l d o c u m e n t s r e l e v a n t t o t h e r e l o c a t i o n p r o g r a m . 2 . T h e p r o v i s i o n o f t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e n e c e s s a r y t o i n t e r p r e t e l e m e n t s o f t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n a n d o t h e r p e r t i n e n t m a t e r i a l s . 3 . C o p i e s o f t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n s h a l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r r e v i e w b y P r o j e c t d i s p l a c e e s , u p o n r e q u e s t , w i t h i n t h i r t y ( 3 0 ) d a y s p r i o r t o f i n a l a p p r o v a l b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . 4 . T h e r i g h t t o s u b m i t w r i t t e n o r o r a l c o m m e n t s a n d o b j e c t i o n s , i n c l u d i n g t h e r i g h t t o s u b m i t w r i t t e n c o m m e n t s o n t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n a n d t o h a v e t h e s e c o m m e n t s a t t a c h e d t o t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n w h e n i t i s f o r w a r d e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r f i n a l a p p r o v a l . 5 . A g e n e r a l n o t i c e o f t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n s h a l l b e d i s t r i b u t e d t o a l l d i s p l a c e e s o f t h e p r o j e c t . T h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n i s a v a i l a b l e f o r c i r c u l a t i o n f o r i n f o r m a t i o n a n d r e v i e w b y i n t e r e s t e d c i t i z e n g r o u p s , S t a t e a n d C o u n t y a g e n c i e s , a l l p e r s o n s a f f e c t e d a n d b y t h e p u b l i c a t l a r g e . 6 . U p o n r e c e i p t o f p u b l i c c o m m e n t s , t h e R e l o c a t i o n P l a n w i l l b e r e v i e w e d t o e n s u r e t h a t i t i s f e a s i b l e . 7 . U p o n c o m p l e t i o n o f a l l r e v i e w s , t h e P l a n w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d f o r a d o p t i o n b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . I t e m 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 Relocation Plan for State Route 74 Realignment and Widening Project, Segment 2, June 2002 June 7, 2002 • iverside County nsportation Commission DEAR OCCUPANT: 13 783c. 3560 University Avenue Suite 100 • Riverside, California 92501 phone: (909)787-7141 • fax: (909)787-7920 • www.rctc.org Re: Preparation and Adoption of a Relocation Plan for the Proposed State Route 74 Realignment and,Widening Project, between the Cities of Lake Elsinore and Perris in Riverside County, CA. The Relocation Plan for the `Highway 74 Widening' project, proposed by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, is now available for your review and comment, if any. Reference copies of the Plan may be found at the following locations: • Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501; Phone Number 787-7141 • Riverside County Library o 600 West Graham Avenue Lake Elsinore, CA; Phone Number: 674-4517 o 163 East San Jacinto Avenue Perris, CA; Phone Number: 657-2358 The Plan will be available from now until July 8, 2002 during normal business hours of each respective location. Written comments on the Plan must be received no later than Noon, July 9, 2002 and should be directed to: Riverside County Transportation Commission Attention: Naty Kopenhaver; SR -74 Relocation Plan 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone No. 787-7141, Fax No. 787-7920 There will be a Public Hearing to adopt the Relocation Plan, at the July 10, 2002 RCTC monthly meeting. Public comment and input can be provided at the meeting. The meeting will be held at the Chancellor's Conference Room, University of California @ Riverside, 1201 University Avenue, Room 207, Riverside, CA. 000003 RELOCATION PLAN FOR STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING PROJECT Segment 2 Prepared for COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 3133 MISSION INN AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92507 By PACIFICRELOCATION CONSULTANTS 100 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4432 1.800.400.7356 INFO@PACRELO.COM June, 2002 INTRODUCTION I: PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 2 A. THE REGIONAL LOCATION 2 B. PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND USES 3 II. ASSESSMENT OF RELOCATION NEEDS 4 A. METHODOLOGY 4 B. FIELD SURVEY DATA - Residential 4 1. General 4 2. Rental Profile 5 3. Occupancy/Overcrowding 5 4. Replacement Housing Needs 6 5. Senior/Handicapped/Housing Assistance Households 7 C FIELD SURVEY DATA - Non -Residential 7 1. Non -Residential Occupant Profiles - 7 III. REPLACEMENT HOUSING RESOURCES 10 A. RESULTS OF RESOURCE STUDY 10 1. Methodology 10 2. Replacement Housing Availability 10 3. Business Site Availability 11 4. Summary 12 B RELATED ISSUES 12 1. Concurrent Residential Displacement 12 2. Temporary Housing 13 3. Loss of Goodwill 13 IV. THE RELOCATION PROGRAM 14 A. PROGRAM ASSURANCES, STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVES 14 B. PUBLIC INFORMATION 15 C. RELOCATION ADVISORY ASSISTANCE 15 D. RELOCATION BENEFITS 16 1. Residential Moving Expense Payments for Families and Individuals 17 2. Rental Assistance Payments To 90 -Day Residential Tenants Who Re -Rent 18 3. Downpayment Assistance - Payments To Tenants Who Purchase 19 4. Payments To Non -Tenured Residential Tenants 19 5. Replacement Housing Payments - Owner/Occupants . . . 19 6. Payments to Mobile Home Occupants 22 7. Payments To Businesses 23 7. Summary 25 E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF RELOCATION BENEFITS 25 F. LAST RESORT HOUSING BENEFITS 26 G. RELOCATION TAX CONSEQUENCES 27 H. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES 27 I: EVICTION POLICY 28 J. LEGAL PRESENCE REQUIREMENT 29 K. PROJECTED DATES OF DISPLACEMENT 29 L. ESTIMATED RELOCATION COSTS 29 • 04040T; 0%7 TABLE 1: Occupied Units by Type & Size (Bedroom) 5 TABLE 2: Project Site Rents 5 TABLE 3: Replacement Housing Needs - Owner 6 TABLE 4: Replacement Housing Needs - Tenant 6 TABLE 5: Project Business Profiles 8 TABLE 6: Non -Occupant Owners Leasing Space To Others 9 TABLE 7: Residential Replacement Site Resources 10 TABLE 8: Total Surveyed Available Space And Price Range - For Lease 11 TABLE 9: Total Surveyed Available Space And Price Range - For Sale 12 TABLE 10: Fixed Moving Payment Schedule 18 TABLE 11: Computation of Monthly Housing Need and Rental Assistance 19 • EXHIBIT A: EXHIBIT B: EXHIBIT C: EXHIBIT D: Sample Interview Forms HUD Annual Income Limitations Residential Informational Brochure Business Informational Brochure 00 0}O The Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission"), has proposed the realignment and widening of State Route 74 between Peach . Street and Seventh Street in the unincorporated area of Perris, Riverside County, California (the "Project"). As _a result of the proposed Project, the Commission will require the acquisition of numerous parcels along State Route 74. On behalf of the Commission, the County of Riverside, Department of Facilities Management, Real Estate Division (the "County"), is responsible for all right of way acquisition related issues. One aspect of theacquisition of real property for the Project will require thedisplacement of residential and non-residential occupants. The proposed acquisition may cause the permanent displacement of thirty-nine (39) residential households and forty-five (45) non-residential occupants. If the Commission goes forward with the proposed Project, relocation assistance services will be required to be provided to the potential displaced occupants. In order to evaluate the present housing/business circumstances and <rehousing/replacement site requirements of potential Project displacees, the following relocation plan (the "Relocation Plan" or "Plan") has been prepared. Funding for the proposed Project is anticipated to. be from .local, state and federal sources. Therefore, the Relocation Plan and subsequent relocation assistance for the Project will be in accordance with the provisions ofthe California Relocation Assistance Law, California Government Code, Section 7260 et.seq. and the California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Chapter 6; as well as, the Uniform Relocation Act (46 U.S.C. § 4600 et seq.), its implementing regulations (49 C.F.R. Part 24) and other requirements and regulations applicable under federal law. Pacific Relocation Consultants, an experienced relocation firm, has been selected to prepare this Relocation Plan and provide all subsequent required relocation assistance for the Commission. The Plan addresses the following: 1. A description of the Project area and specific Project site (SECTION I)` 2. An assessment of the aggregate relocation needs of persons and / or businesses who may be displaced as a result of the Project, including survey methods and results (SECTION II); An assessment of the availability of comparable replacement housing and business sites within Perris and surrounding Cities and unincorporated areas of the County of Riverside (SECTION III); and, The steps and procedures that the Commission will follow to ensure a satisfactory, and thorough relocation program (SECTION IV). • 6D BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) A. THE REGIONAL LOCATION The State Route 74 Realignment and Widening - Segment 2 A -C Project is located in the unincorporated area of Perris, Riverside County, California, running northeasterly between the City of Lake Elsinore and Interstate Route 15 to the west and the City of Perris and Interstate Route 215 to the east. (See Figure 1. Map of Regional Project Location, below.) Uf.1)> ) sJr:1r;l '•rte i '',cg;�� P it r - 1 1 xn I f gilt, ' ii'i jJ J IriiInr i{::=r17:17r1 •Pedley Riverside Moreno Valley aliformia C' State Historic Park Woo•crest \ March Field Corona Cer"rit PROJECT SITE edco Hill Nuevo • Banning Beaumo Homela San Jacint Hemet Winchester • idbnieta Hot Springs a echan¢aln tan Res San Clemente ,��, 1 ` .Clemente Stan Beach' • alibra�! Pauma In Street:AtlasaUSAiar 2009 GUrT Jtu�Rei iO4n0.0 Figure 1: Regional Project Setting ation ala an Reservation. Pauma Valley+ Yuima prings Jac (Jydl:ui1) ii`rJ�usJin enter i;Jrr;onJ ir;li�n it..d ,Cahuilla uanga serve State Park ran Reservation. nervation •Warner So F PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000010 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C B. PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND USES The Project begins on State Route 74 at its westerly end approximately 3.5 miles from Interstate 15 at Peach Street and runs northeasterly approximately 5 miles to the westerly border of the City of Perris at Seventh Street, approximately 2.3 miles from Interstate 215 to the east. (See Figure 2: Project Site Location). Figure 2: Project Site Location Development along this route are scattered on both sides of the highway. Property characteristics for the most part are generally rural residential, consisting of older mobile home and single family residences on %2 acre or greater lots. Commercial/industrial uses are spread throughout the Project serving the local community and commuters using the highway, i.e. liquor store/market, tavern, auto repair/sales, home/contractor improvement sales/service. Other uses include small churches which serve the immediate neighborhood. 00inP ED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) II. ASSESSMENT OF RELOCATION NEEDS, METHODOLOGY To obtain occupant .information necessary for the preparation of - this Plan, personal interviews and resource surveys were generally conducted between August 2001- September, 2001. A few properties, after the initial interviews were completed, were identified as potential displacements and subsequently interviewed. Inquiries made of residential occupants included: occupancy status, household size and composition, income and rental information, length and type of occupancy, disabilities/health problems, and preferences related to replacement housing. Inquiries made of the business owners included occupancy status, number of employees, business description, source of clientele, and preferred relocation areas. All information was anecdotal and not validated by documentary evidence that otherwise would be required to conform to qualifying criteria, such as rent, length of residency, and income. Samples of the Residential Interview Form and the Business Interview Form can be found as Exhibit "A" located in the back of this report. The following Field Survey Data is based on information gained from residential households and businesses within the Project. The actual number of displacements identified in the Plan may be greater or smaller depending on final project design and actual impacts to the properties. This Plan assumes the greatest known impact, causing the greatest displacement. It is anticipated that there will be less displacements than identified. B. FIELD SURVEY DATA - Residential 1. General As identified in the introduction, the proposed acquisition may cause the permanent - displacement of thirty-nine (39) residential households. These 39 residential households consist of twenty-three (23) tenant occupant households and sixteen (16) owner occupant households. Two of the households were reported to own mobile homes and occupy the land as a tenant occupant. For the purposes of this Plan and the division of tenant vs. owner occupant, as indicated above, they will be considered owner occupants (though eligible for tenant rental assistance payments in accordance with applicable guidelines). Two (2) of the occupiable tenant units were vacant at the time of the interviews, possibly only having owner personal property to be moved and three (3) tenant households did not respond to repeated attempts for an interview. Of the 16 owner occupant households, two (2) did not respond to repeated attempts for an interview. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) ro0012 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C Therefore, this plan will address the information gathered and needs for the eighteen (18) tenant households and fourteen (14) owner occupied households. Occupied units by type and size for both tenant and owner occupants are shown in Table 1, below. The below table indicates a total of 83 bedrooms being occupied by project occupants. Type/Bedroom 1 2 3 4 Total Single Family Owner 0 1 3 0 4 Tenant 0 1 1 0 2 Apartment Owner Tenant 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 Mobile Home • Owner • Tenant 1 4 4 1 10 0 5 9 0 14 Total 1 12 18 1 32 Rental Profile Table 2, below, provides the rental ranges tenants indicated. they were paying for the 2 and.3 bedroom units they are occupying. 3. Occupancy/Overcrowding Of the residential households interviewed for the Project, there were reported to be 63 adults and 30 children. Twenty-five (25) of the children are considered school - age. The average occupant density among the 30 reported household units is 3.10 persons per unit. •: • 1,0 *RED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C While some tenant households may be of a size enabling them to relocate to units with a lesser bedroom count than that presently occupied, displacee tenant occupied households will be relocated to accommodation of a size no less than that presently occupied and, up -graded by bedroom count where called for by generally accepted housing standards of 2+1, or 2 occupants per bedroom with 1 occupant occupying other rooms. The resultant upward shift in unit size will impact only one of the tenant households requiring a shift from a 3 bedroom to a 4 bedroom unit. 4. Replacement Housing Needs Owner.Occupant Current occupancy status of the 14 owner occupants interviewed show 4 households occupying single family residences and 10 occupying mobile homes. The replacement housing needs of the 14 owner occupants would be to find replacement dwellings with similar size bedrooms, 2 and 3 and 4 bedrooms and type of dwelling the occupants are occupying i.e. single family dwelling and mobile home. Table 3, below, reflects replacement housing needs by type of unit and bedroom size: Tenant Occupant Of the 18 tenants who reported, the replacement site needs, including the one tenant household requiring a shift from a 3 bedroom to a 4 bedroom unit, are shown on on the following page, in Table 4. TYPE 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Total Single Family 1 0 1 2 Apartment 1• 1 0 2 Mobile Home 5 9 0 14 Total 7 10 1 18 PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C Senior/Handicapped/Housing Assistance Households Elderly household is defined as a household in which the head of household or spouse is 62 years or older. The survey identified nine (9) elderly households. A Handicapped household is defined as a household in which any member is handicapped or disabled: Five (5) householdsindicated having members with health problems and/or disability. Of these 5, 2 households are reported to be elderly. Handicapped or disabilities were reported to be physical due to health and/or accident related or mental. One disability requires wheel chair accessability. Special consideration shall be given to elderly households or individuals with disabilities in regards to financing and locating for sale, rent or lease comparable replacement dwellings; housing which may require special replacement housing features, if required; and close to medical, shopping or other locational needs. There were reported to be three (3) households receiving housing assistance. Similar replacement dwellings which qualify for housing assistance will be provided, if available. FIELD SURVEY DATA Non -Residential The following Field Survey Data is based on information gained from the non-residential occupants within the Project. 1. Non -Residential Occupant Profiles Within the State Route 74 Realignment and Widening project, there are forty-five (45) non-residential occupants. Of these 45 non-residential occupants, there are fifteen (15) commercial businesses, two (2) non -profits, one (1) non -qualified business/non-profit, and twenty-seven (27) non -occupant owners leasing space to others. Business/Non-Profit The information in Table 5, on the following page, reflects the information gathered from the 15 commercial and 2 non-profit occupants. The Table lists the reported use, number of employees, ownership type, facility size, current rent/price per square foot, and any comments. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 00001"5 RELOCATION PLAN -. STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING/ SEGMENT 2 A -C .. . ....,, ., , c.,. s, _ _ ,. .. .:,4> ,. -.- sic - sros,.a.,,ani �.�:.zt,�. ., ,.a,v. ., .A k . .. �,..✓cv..im�,:Yia-v-,.�.eva _-s6'sau'^rs_e. ,. �^s�.-.k�dk., „s ,$ Use # of Employ. Owner. Type Facility Size Rent/Mo. $/S.F. Comments Liquor Store/Market 5 Sole Prop. 2,600 sf Own . Want to sell business Office 2 Partner. 400 sf $400/$1.00 Want to move to remainder property Donut Store 0 Sole Prop. 900 sf $700/$0.78 Cell Tower n/a Partner. 5,250 sf $600/$0.11 Ce11 Tower 0 Corp. n/a n/a Not able to get info. R.E. Rental 0 Sole Prop. n/a Own Business run out of residence Tire Sales & Repair 4 Sole Prop. —2,000 sf $645/$0.32 Relocate to Temecula, Moerno Valley, Sun City Church 0 Non -Profit 1,500 sf Own Will move to remainder. Only personal property to be moved Convenience Market 0 Corp. 3,000 sf $1,900/$0.63. Have replacement site. Trying to get approvals to occupy Fence Supply & Equip. 4 Corp. 8 Acres n/a May only be on -site relocations Liquor Store/Market 1 Sole Prop. 1,800 sf Own Want to move to remainder property Cabinet Manufacture & Installations 3 Partner. 13,000 sf Own Desires to keep residence and business on same property Electronic Business n/a n/a n/a $175.00 Uses space for storage Bar 4 Partner. 1,858 sf $1,500/$0.81 Want to stay in Perris area Church 0 Non -Profit —2,500 sf Own Have property across street to relocate Rental/Sales Equipment Yard 6 Corp. 3,200 sf $5,300/$1.66 May only be on -site relocations Tire Sales & Repair 0 Sole Prop. --700 sf $775/$1.11 Have 2nd location in City of Perris PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C Non -Qualified Business/Non-Profit As indicated above their was one (1) occupant that was identified as "non -qualified business/non-profit". This occupant uses a residential property to have prayer services as well as a storage/distribution place for donated items (clothes) for the community. The operation is not a legal non-profit organization nor a business operation. Therefore, only relocation advisory services and moving expenses will be provided to this occupant. Non -Occupant Owner Leasing Space To Others The 27 non -occupant owners leasing space to others are non -occupant landlords whose sole activity at the site is providing space to others who will be displaced as a result of the proposed acquisitions. This is considered a business and they maybe eligible to receive a payment for moving of personal property and for expenses actually incurred in relocating and reestablishing at a replacement site, not to exceed $10,000. The types of properties non -occupant owners in the Project who lease space which will be affected by the proposed project are shown in Table 6, below. During the relocation process, current and continuing information on the availability and lease rates, and other terms pertaining to suitable replacement locations will be provided to assist the business owners and non-profit organizations in re-establishing their operations if displaced. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) III. REPLACEMENT HOUSING RESOURCES RESULTS OF RESOURCE STUDY 1. Methodology To determine the availability of comparable housing, and commercial sites prior to the displacement of residential and business occupants from the Project site, replacement housing, and other resources were researched periodically between August 2001- January 2002, through the following sources: Survey of classified rental listings of daily and weekly newspapers, and other periodicals (e.g., 'The Press Enterprise', and 'The Penny Saver') Internet sources (e.g. www.inlandempire.com, www.homestore.com, www.thepennysaver.com, www.realtor.com, www.homeseelers.com, www.homescape.com, and www.yahoo.com. - Windshield surveys of residential, and commercial areas in and around the Project site; and, - Telephone and field contact with real estate, and property management companies and professionals in the Perris and Lake Elsinore City. 2. Replacement Housing Availability Based on the above survey there is presently available, within the Project and surrounding areas, adequate replacement site resources necessary for the needs of those proposed to be displaced for this project. The needs for replacement sites and the available resources are reflected in Table 7, below. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C For Sale Resources* Single Family - 2 Bed. 1 10 $89,900- $124,900 Single Family - 3 Bed. 3 14 $104,900 - $179,900 Single Family - 4 Bed. 0 7 $149,900 - $192,500 Mobile Home - 1 Bed. 0** n/a Mobile. Home - 2 Bed. 4 16 $75,000 - $99,000 Mobile Home - 3 Bed. 4 9 $75,000 - $95,900 Mobile Home - 4 Bed.. 1 0*** n/a *The above survey of for sale housing is solely for purposes of relocation and does not have any bearing on the issue of just compensation for acquisition of real property for the Project. * * No 1 bedroom mobile homes were found. If no 1 bedroom mobile homes are available for sale at time of determining replacement housing entitlement, 2 bedroom mobile homes will be used for referrals and entitlement determination. ***No 4 bedroom mobile homes were found. If no 4 bedroom mobile homes are available for sale at time of determining replacement housing entitlement, 4 bedroom single family homes will be used for referrals and entitlement determination - See Single Family 4 Bedroom in above Table 3. Business Site Availability Space availability was researched by utilizing real estate brokers that specialize in similar commercial properties in the area; newspaper advertisements; internet sources and, windshield surveys. The survey focused on industrial/warehouse and retail uses within the Cities of Riverside, Corona, Perris, Lake Elsinore, Temecula, and all unincorporated areas of the. County surrounding those areas. Over 80 listings of commercial/industrial properties were obtained during our survey period. The below Tables provides a breakdown of the available properties by identified categories. TABLE 8, below, illustrates the approximate total of available space for lease and price range broken down by retail and Industrial/warehouse uses. Q 0#0E'43ED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C TABLE 9, below, illustrates the approximate total of available space for sale and price range broken down by retail and Industrial/warehouse uses. 4. Summary Residential Considering the above described availability of replacement housing site resources, and the timing of planned displacement of occupants, it appears that there will be more than adequate replacement resources for residential occupants who may be displaced by the Project Non -Residential Occupants (Business) While there appears to be an adequate supply of non-residential property to relocate the anticipated non-residential occupants, some non-residential occupants may be more difficult to relocate due to specific needs of the non-residential occupant, cost of replacement site properties, and the availability of specific properties at the time displacement is required. Nevertheless, every effort will be made to provide on- going, current, and continuing information on the availability, prices, and rental of comparable commercial properties throughout the relocation process. B. RELATED ISSUES 1. Concurrent. Residential Displacement The concept of concurrent displacement should be addressed when analyzing available replacement housing. It must be shown that the community can absorb all potential displacees from the Project site, as well as those from other projects which may be occurring at the same time during the current project activity. A survey of local public agencies, transportation agencies and housing authorities indicated that there are no competing projects in the area that are or will create a competing demand for Project replacement housing or the type of business uses in this Project. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C 2. Temporary Housing It is not expected that any temporary housing will be necessary to meet occupant needs in the Project, since an adequate supply of comparable replacement dwellings . exists. Loss of Goodwill In most projects causing displacement of businesses, some businesses may be considerably more difficult to relocate than others, particularly without jeopardizing accrued business goodwill. Every effort will be made by relocation staffto identify potential relocation sites and to sort out the complexities that ensue during a business move. It may be necessary in some instances, where relocation sites cannot be identified for businesses, to provide compensation for loss of goodwill as required for in State law (California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510). The owner of a business "conducted on a property acquired by the Commission by condemnation, may be compensated for a "loss of goodwill" if the owner proves all of the following: The loss is caused by the taking of the property; b) The loss cannot reasonably be prevented by relocation of the business or taking steps and adopting procedures that a reasonably prudent person would take to preserve the goodwill; and The compensation for the loss has not been included as a relocation payment, or duplicated in compensation otherwise awarded to the owner. Goodwill consists of the benefits that accrue to a business as a result of its location, reputation for dependability, skill or quality, and any other circumstances resulting in probable retention of old or acquisition of new patronage. If a claim for loss of goodwill is to be made, it must be filed after displacement has occurred, allowing sufficient time to enable determination of loss, if any. The process of claiming loss of goodwill occurs outside the field of relocation assistance. The preservation of business goodwill, however, is an issue that involves the relocation consultant and business operator directly in the search for replacement sites. PREPArsED BY PACIFIC.RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 0 0021 IV. THE RELOCATION PROGRAM PROGRAM ASSURANCES, STANDARDS AND OBJECTIVES The relocation program to be implemented by the Commission will conform with the standards and provisions of the California Government Code Section 7260 et. seq.; Title 25, Chapter 6 of the California Code of Regulations; and the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance And Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, 49 CFR Part 24. Pursuant to these standards, provisions, rules and, regulations, program objectives will be as follows: To fully inform eligible project occupants of the nature of, and procedures for obtaining relocation assistance and benefits. To determine the needs of each residential displacee eligible for assistance. 3. To provide an adequate number of referrals to comparable, decent, safe and sanitary housing units within a reasonable time prior to displacement and assure that no_ residential occupant is required to move without a minimum of 90 days written notice to vacate. To provide current and continuously updated information concerning replacement housing opportunities. 5. To provide assistance that does not result in different, or separate treatment due to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status or other arbitrary circumstances. 6. To supply information concerning federal and state housing programs and other governmental programs providing assistance to displaced persons. 7. To assist each eligible person to complete applications for benefits. To make relocation benefit payments in accordance with State and Federal guidelines, as applicable, including the provisions of the Last Resort Housing sections where applicable. • To inform all persons subject to displacement of the Commission's policies with regard to eviction and property management. 10. To establish and maintain a formal grievance procedure for use by displaced persons seeking administrative review of Commission decisions with respect to relocation assistance. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000022 RELOCATION PLAN- STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C B. PUBLIC INFORMATION The Commission will ensure the following: 1. Full and timely access to all documents relevant to the relocation program. 2 The provision oftechnical assistance necessary to interpret elements of the relocation plan and other pertinent materials. 3 Copies of this Plan shall be available for review by Project displacees, upon request, within thirty (30) days prior to final approval by the Commission. 4. The right to submit written or oral comments and objections, including the right to submit written comments on the Relocation Plan and to have these comments attached to the Plan when it is forwarded to the Commission for final approval. 5. A general notice of this Plan shall be distributed to all displacees of this project. This plan is available for circulation for information and review by interested citizen groups, State and County agencies, all persons affected and by the public at large. Upon receipt of public comments, the Plan will be reviewed to ensure that it is feasible. 7: Upon completion of all reviews, the Plan will be presented for adoption by the Commission. C. RELOCATION ADVISORY ASSISTANCE As a function of the overall relocation assistance program, technical and advisory assistance will be provided to all displacees. The following specific activities will occur: 1. Each household and business affected by the project will be personally interviewed to gather information appropriate to determine needs and preferences with regard to the replacement of existing accommodations. Unless an occupant is unavailable or refuses contact, interviews will be performed within a reasonable period after the initiation of negotiations, which is defined as the date of the presentation of the first written offer to purchase. Inquiries made of residential occupants by relocation personnel will cover the following areas: family size, ethnic background, age and health considerations, employment status, family income, transportation needs, and location preferences related to replacement housing. Inquiries made of business owners will cover the PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000023 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C following areas: zoning requirements, special site needs, and locational preferences related to reestablishment of the business operation. 2. A printed "Residential Informational Brochure" (See Exhibit "C") will be provided to all displaced persons. A printed "Relocation Brochure for Business Tenants" (See Exhibit "D") will be provided to all displaced businesses. Signed acknowledgments will be obtained to verify receipt of this material. Appropriate replacement housing referrals will be made to residential displacees on a timely basis. Field surveys will be conducted in order to identify available housing resources. Every effort will be made to find comparable replacement housing units which are reasonably accessible to currently utilized medical facilities, places of employment, shopping areas and public transportation, and which are in all other respects suitable to each household circumstance. Eligible business owners will receive referrals to replacement sites that match, as closely as possible, the requirements and preferences of each business with regard to size, cost and location. 4. Transportation will be provided, if necessary, for any displaced occupant to inspect replacement sites within the local area. Specific assistance may also be provided to senior citizens in finding housing near friends, relatives, medical facilities and convenient transportation. Assistance will be offered to all displacees in connection with arrangements for the purchase of real property, the completion of applications for replacement housing, obtaining required business permits or licenses, the filing of claim forms to request relocation benefits from the Commission, and to obtain services from other public agencies. 6. Special assistance in the -form of referrals to governmental, and social service agencies will be made, if needed. Referral agencies may include, but not necessarily be limited to: (a) Social Security Administration (b) The County of Riverside and other local City Housing Authorities (c) Employment Agencies (d) Riverside County Department of Social Services (e) Small Business Administration RELOCATION BENEFITS Relocation benefits will be provided in accordance with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance And Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, of 1970, as amended, and its PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) RELOCATION PLAN STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C implementing regulation - 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 24; and, California Government Code Section 7260 et. seq., and it is implementing regulations - California Code of Regulations, Title 25, Division 1, Chapter 6. Relocation assistance categories applicable to this Project are discussed below. Benefits will be paid to eligible displaced persons upon submission of required claim forms and documentation in accordance with Commission -approved procedures. Specific eligibility requirements and benefit plans will be detailed on an individual basis with all displacees. In the course of personal interviews and follow-up visits,.each displacee will be counseled as to available options, and the consequences of any choice with respect to financial assistance_ The Commission may provide advance payments to assist displacees in securing replacement housing units (e.g., security/key deposits, etc.). Requests for advance payments will be expeditiously processed to help avoid the loss of desirable and appropriate replacement housing. For tenants who are currently occupying properties with public assisted housing certificates or vouchers (Section 8) and who are not eligible for a rental assistance payment because similar, comparable public assisted housing are available , the Commission may provide the displacees portion of the first months rent, security deposit, and necessary credit check costs as a moving expense, to assist those occupants in obtaining and securing replacement housing. Relocation assistance categories applicable to this Project are as follows: 1. Residential Moving Expense Payments for Families and Individuals All displaced residential occupants will be eligible to receive a payment for moving expenses, except as noted. Moving expense payments will be made based upon a fixed schedule, or according to the cost of professional services: a. Actual, Reasonable Moving Expense Payment - Professional Move If the displacee elects to have a licensed professional mover perform the move, the actual cost of the moving services, based on at least two acceptable bids, will be compensated for by the Commission, either in the form of a direct payment to the mover or, as reimbursement to the displacee. Transportation costs are limited to a distance of fifty (50) miles, unless a further distance is determined justified by the Commission. In addition to the actual move, costs associated with utility hook-ups (i.e. gas, water, electricity, phone and cable), if any, are eligible for reimbursement. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000025' RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING/ SEGMENT 2 A -C b. Fixed Payment In -Lieu of Actual Moving Cost - Room Count A fixed payment for moving expenses is based on the room count in the occupied dwelling. The fixed payment includes all utility connections as described above. The current schedule for fixed moving payments is set forth below in Table 10. One room $575.00 Two rooms $750.00 Three rooms $925.00 Four rooms $1,100.00 Five rooms $1,325.00 Six rooms $1,550.00 Seven rooms $1,775.00 Eight rooms $2,000.00 each additional room $200.00 First Room $375.00 each additional room $60.00 2. Rental Assistance Payments To 90 -Day Residential Tenants Who Re -Rent Residential tenants who have established their residency within the Project site for a minimum of 90 days prior to the initiation of negotiations and who choose to rent again, will be eligible for a Rental Assistance Payments. Except in the case of Last Resort situations (See Section IV, Part F - Last Resort Housin.g), Rental Assistance Payments will be limited to a maximum of $5,250.00 based upon the monthly housing need over a forty-two (42) month period. The following table, TABLE 11, displays the method for computing monthly housing 'need and rental assistance. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 00002'8 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C or Pr iNd or Subtracted From: $ 500.00 Old Rent plus Utility Allowance $ 445.00 30% of the Gross Monthly Household Income* 550.00 Actual New Rent including Utility Allowance $ 575.00 Determined by Relocation Representative, including Utility Allowance $ 550.00 $ 105.00 Subtract line 3 from line 6 $4,410.00 Multiply line 7 by 42 months * Gross household income means the.total annual income of all family members 18 years of age or older. Downpayment Assistance - Payments To. Tenants Who Purchase Residential tenants who are otherwise eligible to receive the Rental Assistance Payment described above, may opt to apply the total sum of their rental assistance eligibility - including Last Resort benefits - toward the purchase of a home. Payments To Non -Tenured Residential Tenants With the exception of those eligible for Last Resort Housing assistance (See Section IV, Part F - Last Resort Housing), residential tenants with less than ninety (90) days of continuous occupancy prior to the initiation of negotiations will be eligible to receive only a payment of their moving expenses. Replacement Housing Payments - Owner/Occupants 1tesrdential owner/occupants who have occupied the dwelling from which they are to be displaced for at least 180 days prior to the initial offer to purchase the property by the Commission, will be eligible for a `Replacement Housing Payment' up to twenty two thousand five hundred dollars ($22,500.00). To be eligible for a PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000027 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C Replacement Housing Payment, a displaced person must purchase, and occupy decent, safe and, sanitary replacement housing within one year of either: i. the date final payment is received, or "just compensation" is deposited in court; or, ii. the Commission makes at least one (1) comparable replacement unit available, whichever is later. The Replacement Housing Payment will be determined on the basis of three separate elements: (a) Purchase Price Differential; (b) Mortgage Interest Differential; and, (c) Incidental Expenses. a) Purchase Price Differential The Purchase Price Differential is an amount that takes into account three different "ingredients": 1. Commission Acquisition Price - The price paid by the Commission for the project site dwelling; 2. Homeowner Purchase Price - The actual purchase price paid by the displacee owner for a replacement dwelling; and, 3. Comparable Replacement Cost - The cost of a decent, safe and, sanitary dwelling comparable to the dwelling acquired by the Commission and, occupied by the displaced owner. For purposes of determining the purchase price differential, the price to be paid by the displaced owner for a replacement dwelling is compared to both the acquisition price paid by the Commission for the project area dwelling and the price of an available and decent, safe and, sanitary dwelling comparable to the project area dwelling which is being acquired. If the purchase price of the replacement home is less than the cost of the comparable. dwelling, the Purchase Price Differential . payment will be limited to the actual difference. If the purchase price of the replacement home is more than the cost of the comparable dwelling, the Purchase Price Differential payment will be based upon the cost of the comparable dwelling. The following example illustrates three (3) possible permutations in this regard. In. all three cases, the sample acquisition cost for the Commission is shown as constant - at one hundred twenty thousand dollars ($120,000.00) and, the comparable dwelling is also fixed, at one hundred thirty thousand dollars ($130,000.00). What differs in the illustrations is the homeowner purchase price of the replacement dwelling. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000028 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C Examples of Replacement Housing Payments - Owners Commission Acquisition Price $ 120,000. $ 120,000. $ 120,000. Actual Replacement Price $ 130,000. $ 150,000. $ 100.000. Comparable Replacement $ 130,000. $ 130,000. $ 130,000. In Example 1., above, the actual replacement price is ten thousand dollars ($10,000..00) more than the Commission's acquisition price for the project site dwelling however, inasmuch as the cost of the comparable replacement is also the same as the actual replacement price, the Replacement Housing Payment is ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). In Example 2., above, the comparable replacement price is still ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) above the price paid by the Commission for the project site home however, the actual replacement price for the home chosen by the owner of the project site dwelling is thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00) more than the Commissionpaid. Since the displaced owner is entitled to only the lesser of the two differentials, the Replacement Housing Payment remains at ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). In Example 3., above, the displaced owner has spent less than what the Commission paid for the project site dwelling and, in this circumstance, there is no eligibility for a Purchase Price Differential payment. It is important to note that, while a displaced homeowner is free to spend more than the established price for a comparable dwelling, initial eligibility is limited by the price of the comparable dwelling. b. Mortgage Interest Differential This element of the overall Replacement Housing Assistance payment is meant to compensate homeowners for the potential loss of favorable financing. The payment is devised to reflect the "present value" of the additional costs required to finance the purchase of a replacement home in those instances wherein the interest rate for a new mortgage exceeds the present rate on the existing loan, plus other certain debt service costs. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) • 000029 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C The payment is based on the lesser of: a) the mortgage balance on the project site home; or, b) the new mortgage amount. To be eligible, the mortgage on the project site dwelling must have been a valid lien on title for at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the Commission's initial written offer to acquire the property. c. Incidental Expenses (Closing Costs) This payment is to compensate for those non -recurring closing costs typically associated with the acquisition of real property, such as the cost of a property survey; the cost of preparing a legal description and deed; recording fees; the cost of title insurance, revenue stamps and transfer taxes; loan application, origination and, appraisal fees; the cost of credit reports; and, the cost of a certification of structural soundness or termite inspection, when required; all exclusive of prepaid expenses such as property taxes, and insurance. Reimbursable costs associated with the purchase price of the dwelling, i.e. title, loan fees, revenue stamps and transfer taxes, shall not exceed the costs associated with the selected comparable replacement dwelling. The total Replacement Housing Payment for which one qualifies is the sum of the Purchase Price Differential; the Mortgage Interest Differential; and, the Incidental Expenses (closing costs). Payments to Mobile Home Occupants As stated previously, there are 2 occupants who own their mobile home and rent the land the mobile home is situated. If the mobile home is determined to be real property or immovable, these occupants will be eligible for both a Rental Assistance Payment as a tenant renting the land, as indicated above in Part D 2., and a replacement housing payment as an owner of the mobile home, as indicated above inPartD3. If the mobile home is determined to be personal property and can be moved, the owner will be paid to move and set up the unit in a new location, including any existing improvements, providing the total cost of moving the coach does not exceed the replacement, cost of a comparable unit; and, any Rental Assistance Payment for increased space rent. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) O RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C 7. Payments To Businesses Displaced businesses and non-profit organizations ("business"), will receive a comprehensive "Informational Brochure" (See Exhibit D at conclusion of this Plan) outlining relocation eligibility issues, and requirements. Pursuant to Federal and State Law, eligible businesses may receive a relocation payment to cover the reasonable cost of moving. They may choose either: (1) a payment for actual reasonable and necessary moving and related expenses; or, (2) a fixed payment not to exceed $20,000.00. a. . Payment for Actual Reasonable and Necessary Moving and Related Expenses. This payment may include the following: Transportation of persons and property from the present location to the replacement location (Transportation costs are limited to a distance of 50 miles, unless otherwise authorized); ii. Packing, crating, uncrating, and unpacking personal property; iii. Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling, and installing relocated and substitute machinery, equipment and other personal property. This includes connection to utilities available nearby and modifications necessary to adapt such property to the replacement structure or to the utilities or to adapt the -utilities to the personal property; iv. Storage of personal property for up to twelve (12) months at the Commission's discretion; v. Insurance of personal property while in storage or transit and the replacement value of property lost, stolen, or damaged in the process of moving where insurance is not readily available; vi. Subject to certain limitations, any license, permit, or certification required by. the displaced business, to the extent that the cost is necessary for reestablishment at the replacement location; PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 0.:0.0031,. RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING/SEGMENT 2 A -C vii. Subject to certain limitations, reasonable and pre -authorized professional services, including architects', attorneys', engineers' fees, and consultants' charges, necessary for (1) planning the move of the personal property, (2) moving the personal property, or (3) installing the relocated personal property at the replacement location; viii. Subject to certain limitations, the purchase and installation of substitute personal property limited to the lesser of (1) the estimated cost to move the item to the replacement location, or (2) the replacement cost, less any proceeds from its sale; ix. Actual direct losses of tangible personal property resulting from moving or discontinuing a business, not -to -exceed the lesser of. (1) the fair market value of the property for continued use at its location prior to displacement, less the proceeds from its sale; or, (2) an amount equal to the reasonable expenses that would have been required to relocate the property, as determined by the Commission, subject to certain limitations; x. Actual and reasonable expenses incurred in searching for a replacement location, not -to -exceed $1,000.00, and including compensation for transportation expenses, time spent searching for a reasonable location, meals, lodging, and real estate broker or agent fees. xi. Actual and reasonable expenses necessary to reestablish a displaced • "small business" (i.e., one having at least one [1], though no more than five hundred [500] employees at the business on the property) at its new location, not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.). This may include such items as advertising, redecoration and, increased lease, or rental payments. xii.. Replacing, or modifying stationery on hand at the time of displacement, made obsolete by the relocation, is also an eligible expenditure. b. A Fixed Payment In Lieu of A Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving and Related Expenses The amount of this payment shall be equal to the average annual net earnings of the business for the last two years prior to displacement. For a non-profit organization, this payment shall be equal to the average annual gross revenues, less administrative expenses, for the last two years prior to. acquisition. The payment to an eligible business or non-profit organization may not be less than $1,000, nor more than $20,000. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000OL RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING/ SEGMENT 2 A -C To qualify for this payment a displaced business: Cannot be a part of a commercial enterprise or organization having at least three other establishments which are not being acquired by the Commission and which is under the same ownership and engaged in the same or similar business activities; ii. Must not be able to relocate without substantial loss of patronage; iii. The business contributed materially to the income of the displaced person; and, iv. The business operation at the displacement property is not solely for the rental of that real property to another. For a non=profit organization to qualify for this payment a it must be determined that it cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of patronage. It is important to note that, when electing to receive a fixed payment, a business or non-profit is not entitled to reimbursement for the actual moving expenses described in Part D 7. a., above. Summary In all instances, specific eligibility requirements and detailed compensation plans will be explained and worked out on an individual basis for both residential and business displacees. In the course of personal interviews and follow-up visits, each displacee will be counseled as to available options and the consequences of any choice with respect to financial assistance. E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON PAYMENT OF RELOCATION BENEFITS - Claims and supporting documentation for relocation benefits must be filed with the Commission within eighteen (18) months from the date the claimant moves from the acquired property or receives final payment for the real property acquired by the Commission, whichever is later. The procedure for the preparation and filing of claims and the processing and delivery of payments will be as follows: 1. Claimant(s) will provide all necessary documentation to substantiate eligibility for assistance. 2. Assistance amounts will bedetermined and required claim forms prepared by relocation personnel in conjunction with claimant(s). PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) • 000033 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C 3. Signed claims and supporting documentation will be submitted to relocation personnel. 4. The Commission will review and approve claims for payment or request additional information. Commission warrants (checks) will be prepared and will be delivered by Relocation personnel, unless circumstances dictate otherwise. 6. Final payments will be issued after confirmation that Project area premises have been completely vacated and actual residency at replacement unit is verified. Receipts of payment will be obtained and maintained in the relocation case file. LAST RESORT HOUSING BENEFITS. A displaced person is entitled to a "Supplemental Relocation Payment", or 'Last Resort Housing' assistance when, in a single residential case, the computed total ofrental assistance eligibility exceeds $5,250.00 for tenants or $22,500 for homeowners. This type of situation is likely to develop among low-income households, in environments where project area rents are particularly low, relative to rental market rents which are, conversely, particularly high and, in instances in which project area rental tenants are "under -housed" pursuant to HUD standards and, the "up -sizing" to larger units results in a significant cost increase for accommodation. Based upon initial survey results, it appears that there will be an adequate supply of replacement housing to meet the needs of residential tenants and homeowners, however, a combination of factors - which would include the income levels of Project tenants; Project site rents; and, a higher cost of replacement accommodation on the open market - will establish the need for last resort housing payments. • Residential tenants who do not meet the 90 -day residency test may otherwise qualify for last resort housing assistance if their ability -to -pay is not sufficient to pay for comparable, decent, safe and sanitary replacement housing. Replacement rent is within a tenant's ability - to -pay if it does not exceed 30% of the gross household income. Residential homeowners will qualify for last resort housing assistance when a combination of the purchase price differential, mortgage interest differential and incidental expenses exceeds the statutory $22,500 limit. When Rental Assistance eligibility exceeds $5,250.00, Project displacees may be eligible for a supplementary, or "Last Resort Housing" Payment in order to ensure access to comparable replacement housing. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 00003 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C The Commission will disburse Last Resort housing payments to the displacee in accordance with the applicable regulation, commencing with the displacee household moving to decent, safe and sanitary housing. At the displacee's discretion, a lump sum payment up to the entire rental assistance entitlement amount, including the amount of any Last Resort Payment, subject to regulation; may be directed so as to assist in the purchase of a replacement dwelling. Any such payment will be deposited directly into an escrow account with provisions to allow the Commission to recover its funds should escrow fail to close. Residential tenants who have not resided in the dwelling unit from which they were displaced, for at least ninety (90) days prior to the initial written offer to purchase the property, and who therefore do not qualify for a Rental Assistance Payment, or Down Payment Assistance Payment may otherwise qualify for a Last Resort Housing Payment under this Section if comparable, decent, safe and sanitary housing is not available. The Commission may approve, at its discretion, alternative methods for providing Last Resort Housing Payments, on a case -by -case basis, including, but not limited to, building of replacement units, minor repairs to, rehabilitation of, and/or additions to an existing replacement dwelling, including the removal of barriers to the handicapped as may be necessary t� meet their (the handicapped's) requirements. -For purposes of qualification, the Commission must determine that the relocating household did not occupy property solely for the purpose of obtaining relocation assistance. G. RELOCATION TAX CONSEQUENCES In general, relocation payments are not considered income for the purpose of the Intemai Revenue Code of 1968, or the Personal Income Tax Law, Part 10 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The preceding statement on tax consequences is not intended to be provision of tax advice by the Commission. Displacees-are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors concerning the tax consequences of relocation payments. H. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES The Commission's Grievance Policy, briefly stated, provides that displacees will have the right to ask for administrative review when they believe themselves aggrieved by a determination as to eligibility; the amount of payment; the failure to provide comparable replacement housing referrals; or, the Commission 's property management practices. Details concerning the entire appeals process will be provided upon request. • PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) • 000.035 RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING /SEGMENT 2 A -C EVICTION POLICY 1. Pursuant to Commission guidelines, eviction is permissible only as a last resort. Persons considered to be in unlawful occupancy are not eligible for relocation assistance and benefits. Relocation records must be documented to reflect the specific circumstances surrounding the eviction. A person is considered to be in unlawful occupancy if the person has been ordered to move by a court of competent jurisdiction or if the person's tenancy has been lawfully terminated by the owner for cause, the tenant has vacated the premises, and the termination was not undertaken for the purpose of evading relocation assistance obligations. 2. Eviction shall be undertaken only for one or more of the following reasons: Failure to pay rent, except in those cases where the failure to pay is due to the lessor's failure to keep the premises in habitable condition; is the result of harassment or retaliatory action; or, is the result of discontinuation, or substantial interruption of services. b) Performance of a dangerous, illegal act in the unit. c) Material breach of the rental agreement and failure to correct breach within 30 days of notice. Maintenance of a nuisance and failure to abate within a reasonable time following notice. Refusal to accept one of a reasonable number of offers of replacement dwellings. A requirement under State or local law, or emergency circumstances that cannot be prevented by reasonable efforts on the part of the public entity. g) Failure to execute a rental agreement with the Commission, and occupant has been provided with a ninety (90) day notice to vacate, and relocation information has been given at least ninety (90) days prior to the eviction and referrals to comparable replacement housing have been provided to the occupant. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) 000038`. RELOCATION PLAN - STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING / SEGMENT 2 A -C J. LEGAL PRESENCE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to the Public Law 105-117 of 11-21-97, in order to be eligible to receive relocation benefits in federally -funded relocation projects, all members ofthe household to be displaced -must certify to their lawful presence in the United States. Similarly, the owner of a sole proprietorship and all owners of a partnership, must certify to their lawful presence in the United States, and a for-profit or a non-profit corporation must certify that it is authorized to conduct business in the United States. Any member of the household, sole proprietorships or partnerships with owners who are not lawfully present in the United States or who decline to provide this information, may be denied relocation benefits. Relocation benefits will be prorated to reflect the number of household members or owners with certified lawful presence in the United States. PROJECTED DATES OF DISPLACEMENT The Commission has begun the acquisition process to acquire necessary parcels_ for the Project. Possession of occupied properties is anticipated to be completed by the end of June 2003. Relocation will proceed as occupants become eligible. It is anticipated that all occupants will be vacated by the end of May 2003. L. ESTIMATED RELOCATION COSTS The total budget estimate for relocation related payments for this Project for the potential 39 residential occupants and 45 non-residential occupants is: Three Million One Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($3,130,000).. This amount includes moving costs for the residential and non-residential occupants, rental assistance payments for the tenants and replacement housing payments for the homeowners. This amount does not include any acquisition related costs, payment to a business for loss of goodwill nor relocation administrative costs. If additional funds are needed to meet relocation assistance obligations unforeseen in the budget preparation process, the Commission may provide the additional, necessary funds. The Commission expects to encounter Last Resort Housing situations and will prepare its budget accordingly. PREPARED BY PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS (PRC) • QO0037; EXHIBIT 'A' RESIDENTIAL A►ND BUSINESS INTERVIEW FORMS 000038 PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS -RESIDENTIAL INTERVIEW FoRNI CASE ID: - - - PROJECT: County: CONSULTANT: OCCUPANT INFORMATION: Claimant(s): DWELLING: Monthly Payment: Number of Bedrooms: Total Number of Bedrooms Needed: 0 Furnished Dwelling $ MAJOR EVENTS: Site Move -In: / First Offer: / / - Initial Interview: / / Address: Rooms: Home Phone: ( ) _ - UTILITIES PAID BY: Gas: 0 Tenant 0 Owner Electric: 0 Tenant 0 Owner Water 0 Tenant . 0 Owner Work Phone: ( ) - Social Sec. #: - - OCCUPANCY STATUS: 0 Rent 0 Lease 0 Mortgage 0 Own (Clear) 0 Vacant 0 No Contact - DWELLING TYPE: 0 Single Family Residence 0 Duplex 0 Apartment 0 Condo/Townhouse 0 Hotel/Motel 0 Mobile Home ETHNICITY: 0 White 0 Hispanic 0 Black 0 Asian 0 Other. PRIMARY LANGUAGE: 0 English 0 Spanish 0 Other. ID OCCUPANT ❑ Elderly Household 0 0 Housing Assistance: $ 0 INFORMATION: Handicapped Household Willing to Relocate from Community Special Features/Improvements: Area/Unit Preference: FAMILY COMPOSITION (USE SEPARATE SHEETS FOR SPLIT CASES) NAME (FIRST, LAST) SEX AGE MONTHLY INCOME Notes (relation, employment, school, transportation, handicap, etc ) 1 M F. $ 2 M F $ 3 M F $ 4 M F S, 5 M F $ a. 000039. PACIFIC RELOCATION CONSULTANTS - BUSINESS INTERVIEW FORM : - - - PROJECT: •ID County:. CONSULTANT: OCCUPANT INFORMATION: Claimant: MAJOR EVENTS: (Business Name) Site Move -In: /. / Address: First Offer: / / Site Owner: Initial Interview: / / NAME TITLE PHONE CONTACT I ( ) - CONTACT 2: ( ) - AiO ERSHIP TYPE: 0 Sole Proprietorship 0 Partnership 0 Corporation 0 Non -Profit ANCY STATUS: 0 Rent 0 Lease 0 Mortgage 0 Own (Clear) 0 Vacant 0 No Contact ETHNICITY: 0 White 0 Hispanic 0 Black 0 Asian 0 Other: PRIMARY LANGUAGE: 0 English 0 Spanish 0 Other: BUSINESS INFORMATION Business Description: 0 Relocate Business ❑ Willing to Relocate from Community. Monthly Occupancy Payment: $ Federal Tax ID: Special Features/Improvements: Number of Employees: Annual Gross Sales: $ Annual Net Income: $ Area/Facility Preference: FACILITY AREA (SQ.FT): Office/Retail: • Whse/Shop: Open Yard: 004040 oddd41 The following figures are approved by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (H.U.D.), for use in the County of Riverside, to define and determine housing eligibility by income level. 1 Person 17,450 2 Person 19,950 27,950 31,950 3 Person 22,450 35,950 5 Person 26,950 43,100 6 Person 28,950 46,300 7 Person 30,950 49,500 8 Person 32,950 52,700 41,950 47,900 53,900 64,700 69,500 74,300 79,050 Figures are per the Department of Housing and Community Development (California), Division of Housing Policy Development, April, 2001 On ' RESIDENTIAL INFORMATIONAL BROCHURE (English) 0000,43,,_ INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT FOR FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS I. GENERAL INFORMATION 11. ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING A REPLACEMENT DWELLING III. MOVING BENEFITS IV. REPLACEMENT HOUSING PAYMENT - TENANTS AND CERTAIN OTHERS V. REPLACEMENT HOUSING PAYMENT- HOMEOWNERS VI. QUALIFICATION FOR AND FILING OF RELOCATION CLAIMS VII. LAST RESORT HOUSING ASSISTANCE VIII. RENTAL AGREEMENT IX. APPEAL PROCEDURES - GRIEVANCE X. TAX STATUS OF RELOCATION BENEFITS XI. LEGAL PRESENCE REQUIREMENT XII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE 1. GENERAL INFORMATION The building in which you now live is in an area to be improved by the Riverside County Transportation Commission ( the "Commission") for the realignment and widening of State Route 74. As the project schedule proceeds, it will be necessary for you to move from your dwelling. You will be notified in a timely manner as to the date by which you must move. Please read this information as it will be helpful to you in determining your eligibility and the amount of your relocation benefits under the federal and/or state law. We suggest you save this informational statement for reference. On behalf of the Commission, The County of Riverside, Department of Facilities and Management, Real Estate Division, has retained the services of Pacific Relocation Consultants, a qualified professional relocation firm, to assist you. The firm is available to explain the program and benefits. Their address and telephone number is: Pacific Relocation Consultants 100 West Broadway, Suite 300 Long Beach, California 90802 Telephone: (800) 400-7356 Spanish speaking representatives are available. Si necesita esta informacion en Espanol, por favor (lame a su representante. Residential Informational Statement 000044 PLEASE DO NOT MOVE PREMATURELY. THIS IS NOT A NOTICE TO VACATE YOUR DWELLING. However, if you desire to move sooner than required, you must contact your representative with Pacific' Relocation Consultants so you will not jeopardize any benefits. This is a general informational brochure only, and is not intended to give a detailed description of either the law or regulations pertaining to the Commission's relocation assistance program. II. ASSISTANCE IN LOCATING A REPLACEMENT DWELLING The Commission, through its representatives, will assist you in locating a comparable replacement dwelling by providing referrals to appropriate and available housing units. You are encouraged to actively seek such housing yourself. When a suitable replacement dwelling unit has been found, your relocation consultant will carry out an inspection and advise you as to whether the dwelling unit meets decent, safe and sanitary housing requirements. A decent, safe and sanitary housing unit provides adequate space for its occupants, proper weatherproofing and sound heating, electrical and plumbing systems. Your new dwelling must pass inspection before relocation assistance payments can be authorized. 11I. MOVING BENEFITS If you must move as a result of displacement by the Commission, you will receive a payment to assist in moving your personal property. There are two types of moving payments. You have the option of selecting either one of the following types of moving payments: A. Fixed Moving Payment A Fixed Moving Payment is based upon the number of rooms you occupy and whether or not you own your own fumiture. The payment is based upon a schedule approved by the Commission, and ranges, for example, from $375.00 for one fumished room to $2,000 for eight rooms in an unfurnished dwelling. (For details see the table on the following page). Your relocation representative will inform you of the amount you are eligible to receive if you choose this type of payment. Residential Informational Statement 000045 Occupant owns furniture Occupant does NOT own furniture 1 room $575.00 1 room $375.00 2 rooms $750.00 3 rooms $925.00 4 rooms $1,100.00 5 rooms $1,325.00 6 rooms $1,550.00 7 rooms $1,775.00 8 rooms $2,000.00 each additional room $200.00 each additional room $60.00 If you select a fixed payment, you will be responsible for arranging for your own move and the Commission will assume no liability for any loss or damage of your personal property. B. Actual Moving Expense (Professional Move) If you wish to engage the services of a licensed commercial mover and have the Commission pay the bill, you may claim the ACTUAL cost of moving your personal property up to 50 miles. Your relocation representative will inform you of the number of competitive moving bids (if any) which may be required, and assist you in developing a scope of services for Commission approval. IV. REPLACEMENT HOUSING PAYMENT - TENANTS AND CERTAIN OTHERS You may be eligible for a payment of up to $5,250.00 to assist you in renting or purchasing a comparable replacement dwelling. In order to qualify, you must either be a tenant who has occupied your present dwelling for a least 90 days prior to the Commission's first offer to purchase the property or an owner who has occupied your dwelling for between 90 and 180 days prior to the Commission's first offer to purchase the property. A. Rental Assistance. If you qualify, and wish to rent your replacement dwelling, your rental assistance benefits will be based upon the difference over a forty-two (42) month period between the rent you must pay for a comparable replacement dwelling and the lesser of your current rent or thirty percent (30%) of your gross monthly household income. You will be required to provide your relocation representative Residential Informational Statement 000046 with monthly rent and household income verification prior to the determination of your eligibility for this - payment. -OR- B. Down -payment Assistance. If you qualify, and wish to purchase a home as a replacement dwelling, you can apply up to the total amount of your rental assistance payment towards the down -payment and non -recurring incidental expenses. Your relocation representative will clarify procedures necessary to apply for this payment. V. REPLACEMENT HOUSING PAYMENT - HOMEOWNERS C. If you owned and occupied a dwelling purchased by the Commission for at least 180 days prior to the first offer to purchase, you may be eligible to receive a payment of up to $22,500.00 to assist you in purchasing a comparable replacement unit. If you owned and occupied the displacement dwelling for at least 90 days but not more than 180 days immediately prior to the date of the Commission's offer to purchase, you may be eligible for a payment of up to $5,250.00. This payment is intended to cover the following items: 1. Purchase Price Differential - An amount which, when added to the amount *for which the Commission purchased your property, equals the lesser of the actual cost of your replacement dwelling; or the amount determined by the Commission as necessaryto purchase a comparable replacement dwelling. Your relocation representative will explain both methods to you. 2. Mortgage Interest Differential - The amount which covers the increased interest costs, if any, required to finance a replacement dwelling. Your relocation representative will explain limiting conditions. 3. Incidental Expenses - Those one time costs incidental to purchasing a replacement unit, such as escrow fees, recording fees, and credit report fees. Recurring expenses such as prepaid _- taxes and insurance premiums are not compensable. Rental Assistance Option - If you are an owner -occupant and choose to rent rather than purchase a replacement dwelling, you may be eligible for a rental assistance payment of up to $5,250.00. The payment will be based on the difference between the fair market rent of the dwelling you occupy and the rent you must pay for a comparable replacement dwelling. If you receive a rental assistance payment, as described above, and later decide to purchase a replacement dwelling, you may apply for a payment equal to the amount you would have received if you had initially purchased a comparable replacement dwelling, less the amount you have already received as a rental assistance payment. Residential Informational Statement Page 4 0 0047 VI. QUALIFICATION FOR AND FILING OF RELOCATION CLAIMS To qualify for a Replacement Housing Payment, you must rent or purchase and occupy a comparable replacement unit within one year from the later of the following: 1. For a tenant, the date you move from the displacement dwelling 2. For an owner -occupant, the date you receive final payment for the displacement dwelling, or, in the case of condemnation, the date the full amount of estimated just compensation is deposited in court, or 3. The date the Commission fulfills its obligation to make available comparable replacement dwellings. All claims for relocation benefits must be filed with the Commission within eighteen (18) months from the date on which you receive final payment for your property, or the date on which you move, whichever is later. VII. LAST RESORT HOUSING ASSISTANCE If comparable replacement dwellings are not available when you are required to move, or if replacement housing is not available within the monetary limits described above, the Commission will provide Last Resort housing assistance to enable you to rent or purchase a replacement dwelling on a timely basis. Last Resort housing assistance is based on the individual circumstances of the displaced person. Your relocation representative will explain the process for determining whether or not you qualify for Last Resort assistance. If you are a tenant, and you choose to purchase rather than rent a comparable replacement dwelling, the entire amount of your rental assistance and last resort eligibility must be applied toward the down -payment of the home you intend to purchase. VIII. RENTAL AGREEMENT As a result of the. Commission's action to purchase the property where you live, you may become a tenant of the Commission. If this occurs, you will be asked to sign a rental agreement which will specify the monthly rent to be paid, when rent payments are due, where they are to be paid and other pertinent information. Except for the causes of eviction set forth below, no person lawfully occupying property to be purchased by the Commission will be required to move without having been provided with at least 90 days written notice from the Commission. Eviction will be undertaken only in the event of one or more of the following infractions: Residential Informational Statement (10t 4-5 A. Failure to pay rent; except in those cases where the failure to pay is due to the lessor's failure to keep the premises in habitable condition, is the result of harassment or retaliatory action or is the result of discontinuation or substantial interruption of services; Performance of dangerous illegal act in the unit; Material breach of the rental agreement and failure to correct breach within 30 days of notice; D. Maintenance of a nuisance and failure to abate within a reasonable time following notice; E.. Refusal to accept one of a reasonable number of offers of replacement dwellings; or F. The eviction is required by State or local law and cannot be prevented by reasonable efforts on the part of the public entity. IX. APPEAL PROCEDURES - GRIEVANCE Any person aggrieved by a determination as to eligibility for a relocation payment, or the amount of a payment, may have his/her claim reviewed or reconsidered in accordance with the Commission's appeals procedure. Complete details on appeal procedures are available upon request from the Commission. X. TAX STATUS OF RELOCATION BENEFITS Relocation benefit payments are not considered as income for the purpose of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the Personal Income Tax Law, Part 10 (commencing with Section 17001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or the Bank and Corporation Tax law, Part 11(commencing with Section 23001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. XI. LAWFUL PRESENCE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to the Public Law 105-117 of 11-21-97, in order to be eligible to receive relocation benefits in federally - funded relocation projects, all members of the household to be displaced must provide information regarding their lawful presence in the United States. In federal projects, any member of the household who is not lawfully present in the United States or declines to provide this information, may be denied relocation benefits. Relocation benefits will be prorated to reflect the number of household members with certified lawful presence in the US: XII. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE AVAILABLE Residential Informational Statement Page 6 1uO49 Those responsible for providing you with relocation assistance hope to assist you in every way possible to minimize the hardships involved in relocating to a new home. Your cooperation wilt be helpful and greatly appreciated. If you have any questions at any time during the process, please do not hesitate to contact your relocation representative. Residential Informational Statement 0000 0 BUSINESS INFORMATIONAL BROCHURE 000p5,1, INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT FOR BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND FARMS Introduction The property on which you now conduct your business is in an area to be improved with the assistance of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Commission") for the realignment and widening of State Route 74. The Commission's plans require the acquisition of several land parcels and the relocation of existing commercial uses. You will be notified in a timely manner as to the date by which you must move. Please read this information as it will be helpful to you in determining your eligibility and the amount of your relocation benefits under the federal and/or state law. We suggest you save this informational statement for reference. This is not a notice to move. It is important that you do not move before you learn what you must do to receive relocation payments and other assistance to which you may be entitled. On behalf of the Commission, the County of Riverside, Department of Facilities and Management, Real Estate Division, has retained the services of Pacific Relocation Consultants (PRC),'a qualified professional relocation firm, to assist you. The firm is available to explain the program and benefits. Their address and telephone number is: Pacific Relocation Consultants 100 West Broadway, Suite 300 Long Beach, California 90802 Telephone: (800) 400-7356 Spanish speaking. representatives are available. Si necesita esta informacion en Espanol, por favor (lame a su representante. Summary of Relocation Assistance As an eligible displaced person, you will be offered appropriate financial and advisory assistance to help you relocate, including: Payment for your moving expenses. You will receive either: • A Payment for Actual Reasonable Moving and Related Expenses, or Business Informational Statement 000052 ; ; " A F i x e d P a y m e n t I n L i e u o f a P a y m e n t f o r A c t u a l M o v i n g a n d R e l a t e d E x p e n s e s B . R e f e r r a l s t o s u i t a b l e r e p l a c e m e n t l o c a t i o n s . C . O t h e r h e l p t o r e e s t a b l i s h y o u r b u s i n e s s a n d m i n i m i z e t h e i m p a c t o f t h e m o v e i n c l u d i n g h e l p i n p r e p a r i n g c l a i m f o r m s t o r e q u e s t r e l o c a t i o n p a y m e n t s . I f y o u d i s a g r e e w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s d e c i s i o n a s t o y o u r r i g h t t o a r e l o c a t i o n p a y m e n t , o r t h e a m o u n t o f t h e p a y m e n t , y o u m a y a p p e a l t h a t d e c i s i o n . S O M E G E N E R A L Q U E S T I O N S H o w w i l l I k n o w I a m e l i g i b l e f o r r e l o c a t i o n a s s i s t a n c e ? Y o u s h o u l d r e c e i v e a w r i t t e n n o t i c e e x p l a i n i n g t h a t y o u a r e e l i g i b l e f o r r e l o c a t i o n a s s i s t a n c e . O r d i n a r i l y , e l i g i b i l i t y b e g i n s o n t h e d a t e t h e o w n e r o f t h e p r o p e r t y r e c e i v e s t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s i n i t i a l w r i t t e n o f f e r t o p u r c h a s e i t . T h e r e f o r e , y o u s h o u l d n o t m o v e b e f o r e t h a t d a t e . I f y o u d o , y o u m a y n o t b e e l i g i b l e f o r r e l o c a t i o n a s s i s t a n c e . H o w W i l l t h e C o m m i s s i o n K n o w H o w M u c h H e l p I N e e d ? Y o u w i l l b e c o n t a c t e d a t a n e a r l y d a t e a n d p e r s o n a l l y i n t e r v i e w e d b y a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o d e t e r m i n e y o u r n e e d s a n d p r e f e r e n c e s f o r a r e p l a c e m e n t l o c a t i o n a n d o t h e r s e r v i c e s . T h e i n t e r v i e w e r w i l l a s k q u e s t i o n s a b o u t s u c h m a t t e r s a s y o u r s p a c e r e q u i r e m e n t s . I t i s t o y o u r a d v a n t a g e t o p r o v i d e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n s o t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n c a n a s s i s t y o u i n m o v i n g w i t h a m i n i m u m o f h a r d s h i p . T h e i n f o r m a t i o n y o u g i v e w i l l b e k e p t i n c o n f i d e n c e . H o w S o o n W i l l I H a v e t o M o v e ? E v e r y r e a s o n a b l e e f f o r t w i l l b e m a d e t o p r o v i d e y o u w i t h s u f f i c i e n t t i m e t o f i n d a n d r e e s t a b l i s h y o u r b u s i n e s s i n a s u i t a b l e r e p l a c e m e n t l o c a t i o n . I f p o s s i b l e , a m u t u a l l y a g r e e a b l e d a t e f o r t h e m o v e w i l l b e w o r k e d o u t . U n l e s s t h e r e i s a n u r g e n t n e e d f o r t h e . p r o p e r t y ( e . g . , y o u r o c c u p a n c y w o u l d p r e s e n t a h e a l t h o r s a f e t y e m e r g e n c y ) , y o u w i l l n o t b e r e q u i r e d t o m o v e w i t h o u t a t l e a s t 9 0 d a y s a d v a n c e w r i t t e n n o t i c e . 1 t i s i m p o r t a n t , h o w e v e r , t h a t y o u k e e p i n c l o s e c o n t a c t w i t h t h e C o m m i s s i o n s o t h a t y o u a r e a w a r e o f t h e t i m e s c h e d u l e f o r c a r r y i n g o u t t h e p r o j e c t a n d t h e a p p r o x i m a t e d a t e b y w h i c h y o u w i l l h a v e t o m o v e . I O w n T h e P r o p e r t y , W i l l 1 B e P a i d F o r I t B e f o r e 1 H a v e T o M o v e ? I f y o u r e a c h a v o l u n t a r y a g r e e m e n t t o s e l l y o u r p r o p e r t y t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n , y o u w i l l n o t b e r e q u i r e d t o m o v e b e f o r e y o u r e c e i v e t h e a g r e e d p u r c h a s e p r i c e . I f t h e p r o p e r t y i s a c q u i r e d t h r o u g h a n e m i n e n t d o m a i n p r o c e e d i n g , y o u c a n n o t b e r e q u i r e d t o m o v e b e f o r e t h e e s t i m a t e d f a i r m a r k e t v a l u e o f t h e p r o p e r t y h a s b e e n d e p o s i t e d w i t h t h e c o u r t . ( Y o u s h o u l d b e a b l e t o w i t h d r a w t h i s a m o u n t i m m e d i a t e l y , l e s s a n y a m o u n t s n e c e s s a r y t o p a y o f f a n y m o r t g a g e o r o t h e r l i e n s o n t h e p r o p e r t y a n d t o r e s o l v e a n y s p e c i a l o w n e r s h i p p r o b l e m s . W i t h d r a w a l o f y o u r s h a r e o f t h e m o n e y w i l l n o t a f f e c t y o u r r i g h t t o s e e k a d d i t i o n a l c o m p e n s a t i o n f o r y o u r p r o p e r t y ) . . ! W i l l 1 H a v e T o P a y R e n t T o T h e C o m m i s s i o n B e f o r e 1 M o v e ? B u s i n e s s I n f o r m a t i o n a l S t a t e m e n t P a g e 2 0 0 0 0 - 5 3 You may be required to pay a fair rent to the Commission for the period between the acquisition of your property and the date that you move. The rent will not exceed that charged for the use of similar properties in similar areas, however, rent is generally the same as in the prior arrangement. How Will 1 Find A Replacement Location? The Commission will provide you with current and continuing information on available replacement locations that meet your needs. The Commission may also provide you with the names of real estate agents and brokers who can assist you in finding the type of replacement location you need. While the Commission will assist you in obtaining a suitable replacement location, you should take an active role in finding and relocating to a location of your choice. No one knows your needs better than you. You will want a facility that provides sufficient space for your planned activities. You will also want to assure that there are no zoning or other requirements which will unduly restrict your planned. operations. Ask the Commission to explain which kind of moving costs are eligible for repayment and which are not eligible. That will enable you to carry out your move in the most advantageous manner. What Other Assistance Will be Available To Help Me? In addition to help in finding a suitable replacement location, other assistance, as necessary, will be provided by the Commission. This includes information on Federal, State, and local programs that may be of help in reestablishing a business. For example, the Small Business Administration (SBA) provides managerial and technical assistance to some businesses. There may also be a government grant or loan program which can help you reestablish your business. The Commission will assist you in applying for help available from government agencies. The range of services depends on the needs of the business being displaced. You should ask the Commission representative to tell you about the specific services that will be available to you. 1 Have A Replacement Location And Want To Move. What Should 1 Do? Before you make any arrangements to move, notify the Commission, in writing, of your intention to move. This should be done at least 30 days before the date you begin your move. The Commission will discuss the move with you and advise you of the relocation payment(s) for which you may be eligible, the requirements to be met, and how to obtain a payment. 1 Plan To Discontinue My Business Rather Than Move. What Should 1 Do? If you have decided to discontinue your business rather than reestablish, you may still be eligible to receive a payment. Contact the Commission and discuss your decision to discontinue your business. You will be informed of the payment, if any, for which you may be eligible, the requirements to be met, and how to obtain your payment What Payment For Moving Expenses will 1 receive? Every business is entitled to a relocation payment to cover the reasonable cost of moving. You may choose either. A. A Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving and Related Expenses, or B. A Fixed Payment In Lieu of Moving and Related Expenses (if you meet the eligibility requirements). What is Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses? Business Informational Statement 00 54 If you choose a Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses, you may claim the cost of: A. Transportation of personal property from your present location to the replacement location. (Generally, transportation costs are limited to a distance of 50 miles. If you plan to move beyond 50 miles, discuss your planned move with the Commission.) B. Packing, crating, uncrating, and unpacking personal property., C. Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling, and installing relocated and substitute machinery, equipment and other personal property. This includes connection to utilities available nearby and modifications necessary to adapt such property to the replacement structure or to the utilities or to adapt the utilities to the personal property. This includes alterations to the replacement structure required to reinstall machinery, equipment or other personal property Storage of personal property for a reasonable period of time, if required. E. Insurance of personal property in connection with the move and required storage. And the replacement value of property lost, stolen, or damaged in the process of moving where insurance is not readily available. Any license, permit or certification required by the displaced business, to the extent that the cost is (1) necessary to its reestablishment at the replacement location and (2) does not exceed the cost for the remaining useful life of the existing license, permit, or certification. G. Reasonable and preauthorized professional services, including architect's, attorney's, and engineer's fees, and consultant's charges, necessary for (1) planning the move of the personal property, (2) moving the personal property, or (3) installing the relocated personal property at the replacement location. H. Relettering signs, printing replacement stationery made obsolete by the move and customer notifications. 1 The reasonable cost incurred in attempting to sell an item that is not relocated. J. Actual direct loss of personal property. This payment provides compensation for property that is neither moved nor promptly replaced with a "substitute item" at the replacement location. Payment is limited to the lesser of. (1) the estimated cost of moving the property or (2) the fair market value of the property for its continued use at - the old location, less any proceeds from its sale. To be eligible, you must make a good faith effort to sell the property, unless the Commission determines that such effort is not necessary. K. Purchase and installation of substitute personal property. Payment will be limited to the lesser of: (1) the estimated cost to move the item to the replacement location, or (2) the actual cost of the substitute item delivered and installed at the replacement location, less any proceeds from its sale or its trade-in value. It is important to discuss your plans with the Commission before you proceed. L. Searching for a replacement location. This payment may not exceed $1,000.00 and may cover costs for. Transportation expenses • Time spent searching for a replacement location, basedon a reasonable salary or eamings Business Informational Statement Page 4 0-000 Reasonable fees paid to real estate agents or brokers to find a replacement location (not fees related to the purchase of a site) Meals and lodging away from home The Commission representative will explain all eligible moving costs, as well as, those which are not eligible. You must be able to account for all costs that you incur, so keep all your receipts: The Commission will inform you of the documentation needed to support your claim. - You may minimize the amount of documentation needed to support your claim, if you elect to "self -move" your property. Payment for self -move is based on the amount of an acceptable low bid or estimate obtained by the Commission. If you self -move, you may move your personal property using your own employees and equipment or a commercial mover. If you and the Commission cannot agree on an acceptable amount to cover the cost of the "self -move," you will have to submit full documentation in support of your claim. You may elect to pay your moving costs yourself and be repaid by the Commission or, if you prefer, you may have the Commission pay the motrer. In either case, let the Commission know before you move. Select your mover with care. The Commission representative can help you select a"reliable and reputable mover. When a payment for "actual direct loss of personal property" or "substitute personal property" is made for an item, the estimated cost of moving the item may be based on the lowest acceptable bid or estimate obtained by the Commission. If not sold or traded -in, the item must remain at the old location and ownership of the item must be transferred to the Commission before you may receive the payment. • What are Reestablishment Expenses? As part of Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses, a small business, farm or non-profit organization may be eligible to receive a payment of up to $10,000 for expenses actually incurred in relocating and reestablishing such operation at a replacement site. Eligible expenses must be reasonable and necessary, as determined by the Commission. They may include but are not limited to the following: . • Repairs or improvements to the replacement real property as required by federal, state or local law, code or ordinance. . Modifications to the replacement property to accommodate the business operation or make replacement structures suitable for conducting the business. C. Construction and Installation costs for exterior signage to advertise the business. D. Provision of utilities from right-of-way to improvements on the replacement site. E. Redecoration or replacement of soiled or worn surfaces at the replacement site, such as paint, paneling or carpeting. . Licenses, fees, and permits where not paid as part of moving expenses. Business Informational Statement 0() C56, G. Feasibility surveys, soil testing and marketing studies. H. Advertising of replacement location. I. Professional services in connection with the purchase or lease of a replacement site. J. Estimated increased costs of operation during the first 2 years at the replacement site, for such items as: 1. Lease or rental changes 2. Personal or real property taxes 3. Insurance premiums, and 4. Utility charges(excluding Impact fees) K. Impact fees or one-time assessments for anticipated heavy utility usage. L Other items that the Commission considers essential to the reestablishment of the business. What Expenses Are Ineligible for Reestablishment Payment? The following is a non-exclusive listing of reestablishment expenditures not considered to be reasonable, necessary or otherwise eligible: A. Purchase of capital assets, such as, office fumiture, filing cabinets, machinery or trade fixtures. B. Purchase of manufacturing materials, production supplies, product inventory, or otherltems used in the normal course of the business operation. C. Interior or exterior refurbishments at the replacement except as otherwise provided for under the business reestablishment payment. D. Interest costs associated with any relocation expense or the purchase of replacement property. E. Payment to a part-time business in the home which does not contribute materially to the household income. What is Fixed Payment In Lieu Of A Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses? A Fixed Payment In Lieu Of A Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses to a business or farm operation is based on the average annual net earnings of the business or farm operation. The payment to an eligible business or farm operation may not be less than $1,000.00, nor more than $20,000.00. The nonprofit organization may be eligible for a payment from $1,000.00 to $20,000.00 subject to the following: A displaced nonprofit organization may choose a fixed payment as stated above if the Commission determines that it cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of existing patronage (membership or clientele.) A nonprofit organization is assumed to meet this test, unless the Commission demonstrates otherwise. Any payment in excess of $1,000.00, must be supported with financial statements for the two 12 month periods prior to displacement The amount to be used for the payment is the average of the last two (2) years annual net eamings. Documentation Business Informational Statement Page 6 • ®0®-057 required may be income tax retums, certified financial statements and accounting records or other similar evidence acceptable to the Commission. To qualify for an In -Lieu payment: A displaced business: 1. must own or rent personal property which must be moved in connection with the displacement and for which an expense would be incurred in such move, and the business vacates or relocates from its displacement site. 2. must be unable to relocate without a substantial loss of existing patronage. 3. must not be part of a commercial enterprise having more than one other entity which is not being acquired by the Commission, and which are under the same ownership and engaged in the same or similar business activities. 4. must not be operated at a displacement dwelling solely for the purpose of renting such dwelling to others. 5. must not be operated at the displacement site solely for the purpose of renting the site to others. 6 must have contributed materially to the income of the displaced person during the two (2) taxable years prior to displacement. B. A displaced nonprofit organization (1) must be unable to relocate without a substantial loss of its existing patronage, and (2) must not be part of an enterprise having another establishment which is not being acquired by the Commission. C. A displaced farm operation must meet certain minimum income requirements. The average annual net earnings of a business farm operation are one-half of its net earnings before Federal, State, or local income taxes during the two (2) taxable years immediately prior to the taxable year in which it was displaced: If not in business for a full two years prior to displacement, the net earnings shall be based on the actual period of operation at the acquired site projected to an annual rate. Average net eamings may be based on a different period of time when the Commission determines it to be more equitable. Net eamings include any compensation paid to the owners of the business, a spouse or dependents. The displaced person shall fumish the Commission proof of net. -- earnings through income tax returns, certified financial statements, or other reasonable evidence which the Commission determines is satisfactory. The Commission will inform you as to your eligibility for this payment and the documentation you must submit to support your claim. Remember, when you elect to take this payment you are not entitled to reimbursement for any other (actual) moving expenses. 1 Own An Outdoor Advertising Display. What Relocation Payment Will 1 Receive? As the owner of an outdoor advertising display, you are eligible for a Relocation Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses. You are not eligible to receive a Payment In Lieu Of A Payment For Actual Reasonable Moving And Related Expenses. Business Informational Statement 000053' If you choose not to relocate or replace the sign, the payment for "direct loss of personal property" would be the lesser of. (1) the depreciated reproduction cost of the sign, as estimated by the Commission, less the proceeds from its sale, or (2) the estimated cost of moving the sign without temporary storage. The Commission will inform you as to the exact costs that may be reimbursed. How do 1 File A Claim For A Relocation Payment? You must file a claim for a relocation payment. The Commission will provide you with the required claim forms, assist you in completing them, and explain the type of documentation that you must submit in order to receive your relocation payments. If you must pay any relocation expenses before you move (e.g., because you must provide security deposit if you lease your new location), discuss your financial needs with the Commission. You may be able to obtain an advance payment. An advance payment may be placed in "escrow" to ensure that the move will be completed on a timely basis. If you are a tenant, you must file your claim within 18 months after the date you move. If you own the property, you must file within 18 months after the date you move, or the date- you receive the final acquisition payment, whichever is later. However, it is to your advantage to file as soon as possible after you move. The sooner you submit your claim, the sooner it can be processed and paid. If you are unable to file your claim within 18 months, the Commission may extend this period. You will be paid promptly after you file an acceptable claim. If there is any question regarding your right to a relocation payment or the amount of the payment, you will be notified, in writing, of the problem and the action you may take to resolve the matter. Appeals Procedures - Grievance If you disagree with the Commission's decision as to your right to a relocation payment or the amount of payment, you may appeal the decision to the Commission. The Commission will inform you of its appeal procedures. At a minimum, you will have 18 months to file your appeal with the Commission. Your appeal must be in writing. However, if you need help, the Commission will assist you in preparing your appeal. If you are not satisfied with the final appeal decision, you may seek review of the matter by the courts. Tax Status of Relocation Benefits Relocation benefit payments are not considered as income for the purpose of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or the Personal Income Tax Law, Part 10 (commencing with Section 17001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, or the Bank and Corporation Tax law, Part 11(commencing with Section 23001) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Lawful Presence Requirement Pursuant to the Public Law 105-117 of 11-21-97, in order to be eligible to receive non-residential relocation benefits in federally -funded relocation projects, the owner of a sole proprietorship and all owners of a partnership must provide information regarding their lawful presence in the United States, and a for-profit or a non-profit corporation must certify that it is authorized to conduct business in the United States. Sole proprietorships or partnerships with owners who Business Informational Statement Page 8 000059 are not lawfully present in the United States or who decline to provide this information, may be denied relocation benefits. Relocation benefits will be prorated to reflect the number of owners with certified lawful presence in the US. Additional Information If you have further questions after reading this brochure, contact Pacific Relocation Consultants and discuss your concerns with your relocation representative. You may wish to read the California Relocation Assistance Act regulations which describes the relocation process in more detail. PRC • Apr 2000 Business Informational Statement 000060 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 A " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Louie Martin, Bechtel Project Controls Manager Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Contracts Cost and Schedule Report BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month of May 31, 2002. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • • The attached material depicts the current cost and schedule status on contracts reported by projects, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date and the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending May 31, 2002. Attachment: Monthly Report — May 2002 Item 7A 00006,E RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY/ ROJECTS W BUDGET REPORT BY RO COMMISSION CONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES PROJECT AUTHORIZED COM MITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 05/31/02 TO DATE CO MMIT MNTS TO DATE ROUTE 60 PROJECTS Final Design HOV 60/215 to Redlands Blvd. (2042) $3,111,749 $3,021,891 97.1% $192,268 $2,224,278 73.6% (3000) r;.,zs.• .:.:.:.: .:.:.. .....: .... ...:... ... .:::97.1°Ia::;:::::::::::: x :'r.::: ;. ROUTE 74 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ/ROW (R02041 9954,9966, $15,011,132 $15,011,132 100.0% $622,701 $8,114,368 54 .1% (R02142) (R02141) (2140) (3001) (3009) :.:U:. :TO:rRI 14 1T.E7?3.:.::.:::::::::.:.:• :.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.;.: .:.: .;.:.::: .::::: .:::.:.: .: . Q11132 : : .:.t.: .:..} ::..... .... ..... :.:.: .::::: 15'011'132::o .... .�..� :::::::::::::::::::::: 13 ;D31n ::::S6 2;7£k9::::::::::::::: :1• 1 '36 1::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ROUTE 79 PROJECTS Engineering/Environ./ROW (3003) $870,049 $770,049 88.5 % $57,793 $607,586 78.9 % Realignment study & Right turn lanes (R09961) • :. :1J TOT ►R U r 79 :o ff :.:•:.:.:.:: ..::. 77 ..:. ....... .. ... .... .... .. ..... . ..'Ya . .:.:.:.: .;.:.:.: .: 7,.:9� ;..:.:.: .:.::::::: 07,`38 :.,. `:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 7$, •/ ROUTE 86 PROJECTS Avenue 58 to Avenue 66 (Segment 2) $20,253,000 $19,500,000 96 .3 % Project Complete $18,060,000 92 .6% $33,860,000 $33,760,000 99 .7% Project Complete $31,013,510 91.9% SIM TA.;RC1UTE$g.:.;. :. ...•:.:..... :. :.:.:.:. :. :.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.. •:.:. 113 000.:.:.::.:.:. . :.:.:.. .•.... ... ......... .. ....... .... ....... ..... ..... ... .. .:.: .: .:.: .: .:.:.: .:.:.: .:.:.:.:.: .:: .: .: .:.: .: .:.:.:::::::::::::::# 53.y60: pp :::::;9.,7th::::s:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::9: ROUTE 91 PROJECTS Soundwall design, ROW and construction $11,902,100 $10,374,324 87.2% $15,481 $9,463,581 91 .2% (R09101,9337,9847,9861,9848,9832,9969,2043) (2058) (2144) (2136) (3600, 3602) Van Buren Blvd. Frwy Hook Ramp (R03008) $2,954,000 $2,954,000 100.0% $0 $2,109,519 71.4 % Mary Street to 7th Street HOV design & ROW $1,274,430 $1,062,025 83.3% $222 $222 0 .0% Sndwall Landscaping (R09933,9946,2059. 3601) $1,603,450 $1,603,450 100. 0% $0 $820,420 51.2 % �i••.R;F,;,ItiT a :.:. :.:. .. ::..•....:.:.:.:. :• : •:.:. :.: •:.;. ;.: • :.:.:.: •: •:.: .. ...... ... ..... ....... . •.. .:. :.. :'#17>••6Q .... ... . .... ........ .:.:.:.;. :. $':i tJ 993' .. .......... ... :. ..:.:.:1`i:::::::::::�. .:/d ::::::i:iii::::r,:, 'is�3:'. y� ROUTE 111 PROJECTS (R09219, 9227,9234,9523,9525,9530,9537,9538) $16,946,856 $15,530,856 91,6% $889,474 $14,941,516 96.2 % 9540,9635,9743,9849-9851,9857,9629 (3401-3405) .. .... Rt.. ..E� .. .......:..... .... .• .. ... .. .::. :.:.:.:..:.:.::•:6,461. 56: ,::::::::::$15;fl;656. ..... :::::::::::::$•'1:;6°• !a ::::::::::::::: $$ 4 7it::: 'i : 41: h ;:;:;;;::::::::::::;::::::::: . r age o • 000082 RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY PROJECTS ` BUDGET REP ORT BY ROUTE CO MMISSION CONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES PROJECT AUTHORIZED COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST DESCRIPTION ALLOCATION TO DATE ALLOCATION 05/31/02 TO DATE CO MMITMNTS TO DATE 1-215 PROJECTS Preliminary Engrg/Environ. (R09008, 9018) $6,726,504 $5,878,173 87.4% $5,704,897 97 .1 % 00.*:!. .:*.. ...,��..,�...... ....... ...... .. ............... ... ........ ....... .... .. .. .. ''� •726: ... •'•��'�'�'' '''''::' ''�'� 4.. . •.. ..... .:�, .t. ,.•...r. ...4... ...:.:.:.:.��+f ..,.$�. .,..3�.. ,. .,.... ., ........ .. .,$. ,.., .. 8� .1;t � . lv . ;:;:;E::::;:::::;::::::::::::5�1 .;: i:::;:; .,704�93. ..;.; .; .;.;.: .:•:::.:.:.:.:.:.;9y:h/Q a INTERCHANGE IMPROV. PROGRAM Yuma IC Landscaping (R09926,9946) $440,000 $400,000 90.9% $0 $312,519 78 .1% • lat1E3C1tl..0'#'IiG`FI/IiN....... .. ............ .. ... ........... Sd4(! IIO. .. ....•..•.. Ot# QOR . •.•. •.•.•. •.•... ..• ... .81 As :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ::::$y,F12 X19:: ;:::::::; ::::::::::::::::::::'19ra PROJECT & CONSTR. MGMT SERV. (R02100) • •'•'''i`'`�"'""`'?? $2,300,000 $2,223,816 ::.:::::.:.:::::.:::: 96.7% ::ti::::;:::::::i;,?,;,:?,;;;::::::::::,::::::::;,,?,?,:,?.:::,:;::::,::;:::::;:;;;:;�;;;�;;:,::;;: $142,283 $1,297,609 58 .4% g,•'.'. • . 0. #0* T0:::. :.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:. :.:.:. :.:. :.:.:...:.:.:.:. :.:.:. :.. .. .. :. :.. ....... 0,1 0.. . $ 23 •,$15 9$:T°fa $#4Z�3$'J l,29 • ,609 ,a:jo PROGRAM PLAN & SERVICES North/South Corridor study (R09936) $25,000 $25,000 100.0 % $0 $0 0.0 % G 00:0:. .. 'Q')'R• . ?..ISM�&:::;:'s . .... . ...:5� R � :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::.:n o 0.14 PARK-N-RIDE/INCENT. PROGRAM (RO 9859) (2101-2117) (9813) (2146) (9917) $2,100,814 $2,100,814 100.0% $248,710 $1,645,152 78.3% ,..... . r... RK. t�-R D�. :. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:. :. ::. ::. 00U :.• RA. .. i 1130 BC4::::::::::::::: �2 . .. .1 ..8. ::;: .::::::::;:::�::: o.� a� � .1fl:::::::::::::: 1 �C4 .�� •:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::r� p � COMMUTER RAIL Studies/Engineering $5,218,070 $4,825,518 92.5% $129,993 $4,517,331 93.6% (RO 9420,9731,9832,9833,9844,9854,9956,2028) R02031,2027,2120,2029„2128, 3800 - 3808-3810) stptiontsite Acq/OP Costs/Maint. Costs (0000,2026,2056,4000-4007, 4198, 4199) 4009 $13,190,402 $13,190,402 100.0% $177,767 $4,342,879 32.9 % !1. ft4. .. p.. �.. .. i'ii��i��... S......8,... .....:..1> 415��A! .... .. ............. ...:.��90 2:yQ o'::::: •:::€::::7 Si�' s�`:'•::;:�::::�: . .. ... . . .... ... .... .. ... .... .. .._.......... :::: �$` t •t � ......... ����134�A! � 6; �! x.. .,,.:........ •. •.....$.• 41. a ....... �I �r 8 ...... $!?. ,...�. .�.. .�. ' .. ... .. .. Mt1 MT �8�:.•::.:::::::::::.•i. $ ...5,...�:. ..............:.. .. ..5 ./a 79 . Page 2of3 0000* • - RCTC MEASURE "A" HIGHWAY/LOCAEETS & ROADS PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY PROJECT EXPENDITURE FOR TOTAL OUTSTANDING % LO AN BALANCE PROJECT APPROVED MONTH ENDED MEASURE "A" LOAN OUTSTANDING TO -DATE AGAINST DESCRIPTION CO MMITMENT 05/31/02 ADVANCES BALANCE CO MMIT MENT APPROVED COMMIT. CITY OF CANYON LAKE Railroad Canyon Rd Improvements $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $752,011 $0 47.0 % . ..... .. .. .......:.:.: .: .:.:. ..3 ..... .. .. ....fit 6A� A0 ':::: •:::::::::;:::::::::::::::;;:' •::::: ; :::. %. CITY OF CORONA Smith, Maple & Lincoln Interchanges & (1) Storm drainage structure $5,212,623 $5,212,623 $3,074,792 $0 59 .0% .. C1=CCi ... . .......... . .....• ...•.. .r.....,....,...,.,.. .;.:•:•:.:•:•:.;.:•.:•: 12'623:::• •:•:::::::: •::: •:.:•:•: •: •:•: •:•:•:•:•:.: •::i,•....i23 :•.tQZ4;X92::;;�!::s:'':SR :::::::::::::::::::::::::580•F CITY OF PERRIS Local streets & road improvements $1,936,419 $1,936,419 $1,258,782 $0 65.0% CITY OF SAN JACINTO Local streets & road improvements $1,324,500 $1,324,500 $860,999 $0 65.0 % CITY OF TEMECULA Local streets & road improvements $5,094,027 $5,094,027 $3,311,406 $0 65.0% CITY OF NORCO Yuma I/C & Local streets and road Imprmts $2,139,067 $2,139,067 $1,390,515 $0 65.0% CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Local streets & road improvements $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $979,116 $0 65.3% CITY OF HEMET Local streets & roads improvements $730,000 $730,000 $0 $0 0.0% :..... . ... ... .... .... ... . :.... ... :. :::::TUT' • �S:s:::::::::::::::s::::::::::::::::. ::::.:. :::.:. . ... ...::::::::::::::::::::::�::.... . ..... ... . . ... .5. ... ..... G, j .:.:.;. :.::14G*;.* . •,:;::::::::::::::::::: .::::::$0::::::::::,:::::::,:::::::,:,:;:::�>r�,6°la NOTE: (1) Loan against interchange improvement programs. All values are for total Project/Contract and not related to fiscal year budgets. Status as o/: 05/31/02 age3o 000064 AGENDA ITEM 7B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement No. 03-19-007 with Management for Investment Advisor Services Public Financial BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: • • 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-19-007 with Public Financial Management for investment advisor services in an amount not to exceed $25,000; and, 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Under the current interest rate conditions, the Commission is receiving the Money Market rates on their reserves for Debt Service. The current Money Market rate is 1.85%. Staff would like to maximize the interest earnings on its funds and is proposing entering into an agreement with Public Financial Management (PFM) to prepare a request for proposal, conduct a bid and present the Commission with an appropriate bank that will enter into a Forward Delivery Agreement (FDA) with Commission to provide a higher rate of interest on the reserves for Debt Service. The approximate yield on the FDA is expected to be 3.85%. The initial analysis shows that entering into a FDA for a term of 3 to 7 years could increase the interest earnings on the reserves for Debt service installments by $1.4 million to $4.0 million. Attached is a market update from PFM outlining the additional interest earnings. Legal Counsel has reviewed the FDA and attached are the stipulations to enter into the FDA agreement. Staff is requesting approval to enter into the contract with PFM to provide these services. PFM will charge the Commission $25,000 to perform these services. Sufficient appropriations have been budgeted to cover this expenditure. Item 7B Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 02-03 Amount: $25,000 Source of Funds: Measure "A" Administrative funds Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 101-19-65302 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/11/2002 Attachments: 1) Letter of Agreement for Public Financial Management 2) Market Update Delivery Agreement from Public Financial Management 3) Letter from Legal Counsel re: Investment of Debt Service Funds in Forward Investment Arrangement Item� 7B ��yy One Keystone Plaza Suite 300 N. Front & Markets Streets Harrisburg, PA 17101 717 232-2723 717 233-6073 fax umidilia a?FM • Public Fithrncisl Titifitnigc;lnc ml, 1-111`i i (AI•C II.a_iln••S' .4iMd:.• To June 3, 2002 Mr. Ivan Chand Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Mr. Chand: The purpose of this letter is to confirm our agreement that Public Financial Management, Inc. ("PFM"), which has served the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the "Issuer") as Financial Advisor will also act as Investment Advisor in connection with the investment of certain funds of the Issuer's Principal and Interest (the "Funds") related to the Issuer's outstanding Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (collectively, the "Bonds"). Specifically, PFM will assist the Issuer with the structuring and competitive procurement of a Forward Delivery Agreement (the "Agreement") for the investment of the Funds. As Investment Advisor we will analyze alternative investment strategies, develop investment agreement specifications, competitively bid " the Agreement, coordinate review of Agreement terms by credit rating agencies and credit enhancers as applicable, review Agreement documentation and coordinate the settlement of the Agreement. At the direction of the Issuer, upon the successful conclusion of this engagement and in consideration of PFM's services as investment advisor in connection with the structuring and bidding of the Agreement, the counter -party on the Agreement will pay PFM a fee of $25,000 on the Issuer's behalf. In our experience such fees are within normal range of fees to invesment advisors for comparable services. This engagement is expected to be completed prior to July 1, 2002. Upon the successful conclusion of this engagement, PFM will have no further responsibility related to the Investment of the proceeds of the Bonds, Prior Bonds or the related Fund. However, PFM will be available to the Issuer to assist with any administrative questions while the Agreement is outstanding. PFM is an investment advisor, registered under the Investment Advisor's Act of 1940. PFM agrees that it will not deal with itself or with any other 'affiliated company or individual in making purchases or sales of securities pursuant to this engagement, nor will we take a long or short position in securities subject to purchase or sale in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and we have no other interest in the issuance of the Bonds or the purchase or sale of securities except as described in this letter agreement. PFM warrants that it has delivered to the Issuer, at least five business days prior to the execution of this letter agreement, PFM's current Securities and Exchange Commission Form ADV, Part II (PFM's disclosure statement). The Issuer acknowledges receipt of such disclosure statement at least five business days prior to the execution of this letter agreement. 000067 osssis BEST BEST St KRIEGER LLP A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS INDIAN WELLS 1760) 568-2051 t ONTARIO (909) 989-8584 STEVEN C. DEBAUN SCDEBAUN@BBKLAW.COM VIA HAND DELIVERY LAWYERS 3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 1028 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502- 1 028 (909) 686- 1450 (909) 686-3083 FAX BBKLAW.COM May 7, 2002 Mr. Ivan Chand Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Re: Investment of Debt Service Funds in Forward Investment Arrangement SAN DIEGO • (619) 525-1300 ORANGE COUNTY (949) 200-0962 SACRAMENTO (9I6) 325-4000 Dear Ivan: WECOVIEn t1 0 8..2002 1-9 RI T C ?RAN You have asked us to determine whether the Commission can invest moneys in the debt service funds established for its outstanding bonds in a forward purchase investment arrangement (the "Forward Contract"). We have reviewed the Indenture under which all series of Commission bonds have been issued and the District's investment policy and conclude that the Forward Contract is a permissible investment if the Forward Contract provider's credit rating is in one of the two highest rating categories of Moody's and Standard & Poor's. The Commission investment policy states that "bond proceeds shall be invested in securities permitted by the applicable bond documents." The Commission's bonds have been issued under supplemental indentures to an Indenture between the Commission and the Bond Trustee dated January 1, 1991 (the "Indenture"). The Indenture specifies the types of investments in which bond proceeds can be invested under the definition "Investment Securities". Subparagraph (xiii) of Investment Securities reads as follows: "(xiii) any investment agreement with a financial institution or insurance company which has at the date of execution thereof an outstanding issue of unsecured, uninsured and unguaranteed debt obligations or a claims paying ability rated in either of the two highest long-term Rating Categories by Moody's and Standard & Poor's;" RVPUB\KAS'.632829 00088 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Mr. Ivan Chand May 7, 2002 Page 2 As described in the proposal we reviewed, the Forward Contract would be classified as an investment contained under the foregoing definition. As such, the Commission could invest debt service funds in the Forward Contract if the credit rating of the provider of the Forward Contract is in one of the two highest long-term rating categories by Moody's and Standard & Poor's. Should the Commission determine to proceed with an investment in a Forward Contract, it should know that at least three bids will need to be received with respect to the investment. In addition, the Commission should consult with bond counsel concerning the potential use of and restrictions, if any, on proceeds received by the Commission under any Forward Contract. We would be glad to assist the Commission in answering any other questions it may have concerning the investment of Commission proceeds and the use of any investment earnings. Sincerely your en C. DeBaun of BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP Counsel, Riverside County Transportation Commission KAS jcq • • RVPUB\ICAS1632029 0000°:69 " " P u b l i c F i n a n c i a l M a n a g e m e n t 9 1 6 - 6 8 3 - 0 2 7 3 P h o n e 9 1 6 - 6 8 3 - 0 2 7 9 F a x b o v e a s @ p u b l i c f m . c o m E - m a i l E - M E M O P u b l i c P i n a n c i a i M a n a g e m c n t + n m 3 c t e t a r s e t r t v g s t n . w l A t i v i s i v x T O : I V A N C H A N D , C H I E F F I N A N C I A L O F F I C E R R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N F R O M : S E A N K . B O Y E A , S T E V E W I S L O S K I , J E N N I F E R T O R R E T T I P U B L I C F I N A N C I A L M A N A G E M E N T D A T E : J U N E 1 1 , 2 0 0 2 R E : M A R K E T U P D A T E : F O R W A R D D E L I V E R Y A G R E E M E N T C u r r e n t m a r k e t c o n d i t i o n s p r e s e n t a n o p p o r t u n i t y f o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( " R C T C ' ) t o i n c r e a s e t h e e a m i n g s o n i t s d e b t s e r v i c e f u n d d e p o s i t s b y e n t e r i n g i n t o a f o r m o f I n v e s t m e n t A g r e e m e n t . O u r i n i t i a l a n a l y s i s s h o w s t h a t e n t e r i n g i n t o a F o r w a r d D e l i v e r y A g r e e m e n t ( " F D A " ) f o r a t e r m o f 3 t o 7 y e a r s c o u l d i n c r e a s e t h e i n t e r e s t e a m i n g s o n t h e S a l e s T a x R e v e n u e B o n d s d e b t s e r v i c e i n s t a l l m e n t s b y $ 1 . 4 m i l l i o n t o $ 4 . 0 m i l l i o n . T h e f o l l o w i n g a n a l y s i s c o m p a r e s a n a s s u m e d c u r r e n t m o n e y m a r k e t y i e l d o f 1 . 8 5 % t o t h e a p p r o x i m a t e 3 . 8 5 % y i e l d t h a t R C T C c o u l d r e c e i v e f r o m e n t e r i n g i n t o a 3 y e a r F D A . T h e p o t e n t i a l b e n e f i t f r o m t h e 7 - y e a r t e r m - l e n g t h F D A i s a l s o s h o w n b e l o w . D e b t S e r v l c e F u n d s F o r w a r d D e I l v e r y A g r e e m e n t v s . M o n t t y M a r k e t F u n d A n a l y s i s I s s u e 3 Y e a r s 7 Y e a r s ( t o M a t u r i t y ) M M k t F D A R a t o v s . M M k t @ 1 . 8 5 % @ 3 . 8 5 % ( 2 . 0 0 % ) M M k t F D A R a t o " v s . M M k t X 1 . 8 5 % 6 4 . 9 5 % ( 3 . 1 0 % ) S e r i e s 1 9 9 1 S e r i e s 1 9 9 3 A S e r i e s 1 9 9 S A S e r l e s l 9 9 7 A B S e r i e s 2 0 0 0 4 5 , 3 2 6 9 4 , 3 2 8 4 9 . 0 0 1 3 7 8 , 2 0 7 7 8 7 , 0 8 0 4 0 8 , 8 7 3 2 4 4 , 7 4 5 5 0 9 , 3 3 4 2 6 4 , 5 8 9 2 0 3 , 4 3 0 4 2 3 , 3 5 3 2 1 9 , 9 2 4 1 4 9 . 6 5 1 3 1 1 , 4 3 6 1 6 1 , 7 8 5 4 5 , 3 2 6 1 2 1 , 2 7 9 7 5 , 9 5 2 6 9 0 , 0 2 1 1 , 8 4 6 , 2 7 2 1 , 1 5 6 , 2 5 1 4 9 9 , 1 6 6 1 , 3 3 5 , 6 0 7 8 3 6 , 4 4 1 3 6 8 , 7 6 1 9 8 6 , 6 8 5 6 1 7 , 9 2 4 2 7 0 , 8 4 0 7 2 4 , 6 8 0 4 5 3 , 8 4 0 A g g r e g a t e : $ 1 , 0 2 1 , 3 5 9 $ 2 , 1 2 5 , 5 3 1 $ 1 , 1 0 4 , 1 7 2 $ 1 , 8 7 4 , 1 1 4 $ 5 , 0 1 4 , 5 2 2 $ 3 , 1 4 0 , 4 0 8 N o t e s : n 1 , 2 0 0 9 i c e p a y m e n t d a t e s , i . e . n o r e i n v e s t m e n t . e o n t h e f r s t d a y o f t h e f o l l o w i n g m o n t h . a s o f J u n e 1 1 , 2 0 0 2 . 1 ) T h r o u g h J u n 1 , 2 0 0 6 , J u 2 ) A s s u m e s S k n p f e i n t e r e s t f o r a i l f u n d s . 3 ) A M n t e r e s t p a i d o n d e b t s e r y 4 ) A s s u m e s d e p o s I t s a r e m a d 5 ) F D A r a t e s a r e e s t i m a t e s 0 0 0 1 7 0 " T h e s e e a r n i n g s e s t i m a t e s a s s u m e t h a t a 3 y e a r a n d 7 y e a r F D A w o u l d l o c k - i n y i e l d s o f 3 . 8 5 % , a n d 4 . 9 5 % r e s p e c t i v e l y a n d t h a t a m o n e y m a r k e t f u n d r a t e w o u l d r e m a i n a t 1 . 8 5 % . T o t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f c h a n g i n g i n t e r e s t r a t e s , w e h a v e a l s o p e r f o r m e d a n i n t e r e s t r a t e s e n s i t i v i t y a n a l y s i s . T h e r e s u l t s o f t h i s a n a l y s i s a r e s h o w n b e l o w a n d p r o v i d e t h e e a m i n g s d i f f e r e n t i a l R C T C w o u l d r e c e i v e a b o v e i t s p r e s e n t e a m i n g s s h o u l d t h e c u r r e n t i n t e r e s t r a t e o f 1 . 8 5 % h o l d o v e r t h e l e n g t h o f t h e F D A , i f m o n e y m a r k e t r a t e s w e r e t o a v e r a g e 5 0 b a s i s p o i n t s l o w e r a t 1 . 3 5 % o v e r t h a t p e r i o d , o r , f i n a l l y , i f m o n e y m a r k e t r a t e s s h o u l d a v e r a g e 2 0 0 b a s i s p o i n t s h i g h e r a t 3 . 8 5 % o v e r t h e F D A t e r m . S e n s i t i v i t y t o C h a n g i n g I n t e r e s t R a t e s F D A E a r n i n g s a b o v e M o n e y M a r k e t R a t e M o n e y M a r k e t R a t e 2 0 0 b p s h i g h e r � 3 . 8 5 % - 1 , 1 1 4 , 3 3 8 C u r r e n t l y � 1 . 8 5 % 1 , 1 0 4 , 1 7 2 . 3 , 1 4 0 , 4 0 8 5 0 b p s l o w e r t 1 . 3 5 % 1 , 3 8 0 , 2 1 5 3 , 6 4 6 , 9 2 5 3 Y e a r s 7 Y e a r s ( t o M a t u r i t y ) W e a l s o c o n d u c t e d a " b r e a k e v e n " a n a l y s i s t o d e t e r m i n e h o w q u i c k l y a n d h o w m u c h i n t e r e s t r a t e s w o u l d h a v e t o i n c r e a s e s u c h t h a t r e m a i n i n g i n v e s t e d i n a m o n e y m a r k e t f u n d w o u l d p r o d u c e e q u i v a l e n t i n t e r e s t e a m i n g s t o a F D A . W e d e t e r m i n e d t h a t i n t e r e s t r a t e s w o u l d n e e d t o i n c r e a s e 9 . 1 b a s i s p o i n t s ( b . p . o r 0 . 0 9 1 % ) p e r m o n t h t h r o u g h J u n e 1 , 2 0 0 5 , c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o a f i n a l i n t e r e s t r a t e o f 5 . 0 4 % , t o p r o d u c e e q u i v a l e n t i n t e r e s t e a m i n g s t o a 3 - y e a r F D A l o c k e d i n a t 3 . 8 5 % . F o r a 7 - y e a r F D A , r a t e s w o u l d n e e d t o i n c r e a s e 7 . 6 b . p . ( o r 0 . 0 7 6 % ) p e r m o n t h t h r o u g h J u n e 1 , 2 0 0 9 , c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o a f i n a l i n t e r e s t r a t e o f 8 . 1 4 % . B r e a k e v e n A n a l y s i s I n c r e a s e i n M o n e y M a r k e t R a t e i n B a s i s P o i n t s P e r M o n t h 3 Y e a r s 7 Y e a r s ( t o M a t u r i t y ) 3 . 8 5 % 1 . 8 5 % 9 ; 1 b . p . 5 . 0 4 % F D A l a v e s t r n e n t R a t e M o n e y M a r k e t R a t e B r e a k e v e n R a t e F i n a l R a t e 4 . 9 5 % 1 . 8 5 % 7 . 6 b . p . 8 . 1 4 % " P a g e 2 " 0 . 0 0 0 7 1 _ " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e D a r r e n K e t t l e , D i r e c t o r o f I n t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l a n d L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e U p d a t e B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l L e g i s l a t i v e U p d a t e a s a n i n f o r m a t i o n i t e m . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : S t a t e U p d a t e G o v e r n o r D a v i s r e l e a s e d h i s M a y R e v i s i o n f o r t h e p r o p o s e d 2 0 0 2 - 0 3 S t a t e B u d g e t i n m i d - M a y . T h e a t t a c h e d m o n t h l y r e p o r t f r o m R C T C S t a t e l o b b y i s t s , S m i t h , K e m p t o n & W a t t s , h i g h l i g h t s t h e i m p a c t o f t h e M a y R e v i s i o n a n d t h e l a t e s t d e l i b e r a t i o n s o f t h e B u d g e t C o n f e r e n c e C o m m i t t e e o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n . T h e M a y R e v i s i o n i n c l u d e d a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n f r o m t h e L e g i s l a t i v e A n a l y s t s O f f i c e ( L A O ) t o i n c r e a s e t h e $ 6 7 8 m i l l i o n l o a n f r o m t h e T r a f f i c C o n g e s t i o n R e l i e f F u n d ( T C R F ) t o t h e S t a t e G e n e r a l F u n d t o a b o u t $ 1 b i l l i o n . T h e L A O o p i n e d t h a t t h e f u n d i n g w a s a v a i l a b l e w i t h i n t h e T C R F t o f l o a t t h e l o a n t o t h e G e n e r a l F u n d b a s e d o n a n a n a l y s i s t h a t t h e L A O c o n d u c t e d t h a t c o n c l u d e d t h a t T C R F f u n d e d p r o j e c t s p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y s c h e d u l e s d o n o t r e q u i r e t h e c a s h o n h a n d i n t h e 2 0 0 2 - 0 3 f i s c a l y e a r . T h e b u d g e t c o n f e r e n c e c o m m i t t e e h a s a g r e e d t h a t t h e S t a t e G e n e r a l F u n d s h o u l d s e t a r e p a y m e n t t e r m a n d p a y i n t e r e s t o n t h e l o a n , a n e l e m e n t t h a t w a s n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h e M a y R e v i s e b u t d o e s m e e t t h e " s p i r i t " o f P r o p o s i t i o n 2 l o a n r e p a y m e n t r e q u i r e m e n t s . F e d e r a l U p d a t e C o n g r e s s h a s y e t t o a g r e e o n a b u d g e t s t r a t e g y f o r F i s c a l y e a r 2 0 0 3 a s o n e m i g h t e x p e c t w i t h a D e m o c r a t i c a l l y c o n t r o l l e d S e n a t e a n d R e p u b l i c a n c o n t r o l l e d H o u s e . S e t t i n g t h e g o v e r n m e n t w i d e s p e n d i n g l i m i t i s t h e f i r s t s t e p t o w a r d s e t t i n g l i m i t s f o r s e p a r a t e c a t e g o r i e s , s u c h a s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , a n d f o r t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s s u b c o m m i t t e e s t h a t w i l l m a r k u p t h e 1 3 i n d i v i d u a l F Y 2 0 0 3 a p p r o p r i a t i o n s b i l l s . I t e m 7 C 0 0 9 0 7 In spite of this fact, however, the annual transportation appropriations bill is still scheduled to be marked up by the House Transportation Appropriations Subcommitee in mid to late July. The attached report from RCTC's Federal lobbyists, David Turch and Associates, references that House Appropriations staff have indicated that Appropriations bill will not move forward until the emergency supplemental appropriations bill is completed. The status on that bill is that a version has now been approved in both the House and Senate, with differing dollar amounts, thus necessitating a Senate/House Conference Committee to iron out the differences. Attachments: 1) Smith, Kempton & Watts Monthly Legislative Update 2) David Turch and Associates Congressional Activity Report • • Item 7C 0oboJ(ry Smith, Kempton & Watts Consulting and Governmental Relations MEMORANDUM To: Darren Kettle RCTC/SANBAG From: DJ Smith, Mark Watts & Delaney Hunter Date: June 7, 2002 Subject: Monthly Legislative Update State Budget • • The state budget is the real focus of transportation related issues this year. The budget contains many provisions to address the significant deficit. For transportation interests, some of these issue include (1) a possible $42 million in lost interest to the SHA due the proposed loans to aid in the rebalancing of the state Budget, (2) addressing a loophole in Proposition 2 that permits SHA loans to be "washed" through other transportation accounts, thus avoiding Proposition 2's loan repayment timeframes, and various actions that effected the Public Transportation Account (PTA) Mark Watts led an effort to address the first issue discussed here, pertaining to possible lost interest. The Assembly Subcommittee adopted a modification to the proposed budget that incorporated recapturing the lost interest as part of the transportation trailer bill. The Budget conference committee as well adopted this approach, and pending any additional changes, this effort will result in recouping the $42 million in interest to the State Highway Account. Senator Murray introduced SCA 11 to address the second issue. This bill failed to pass off the Senate Appropriations Suspense file and has been retained in 980 Ninth Street, Suite 1560 . Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 446-5508 . Fax: (916) 446-1499 000074 committee. Discussions have begun with Senator Murray regarding a strategy to move this measure after the budget deliberations are completed. Finally, the PTA includes funding for the State Transit Assistance (STA) program. The account relies heavily on revenues derived from sales tax on motor vehicle fuels. As fuel process dropped earlier this year and have remained below previous projections, the amount available for STA has been reduced; the May Revise brought the estimated STA down from more than $170 million in the current year to $98 million in the proposed budget. To partially offset this, Mark Watts worked with California Transit Association representatives and advocates for transit interests to secure a modest appropriation of $5.2 million to enhance the STA funding level for the budget year. The budget conference committee has adopted this approach. We will now work with the Administration to gain their concurrence for this augmentation. Legislation of Interest SB 1262 (Torlakson) SB 1262 would require local regional transportation authorities and entities to dedicate a minimum of 10% of the local RTIP's for new regional smart growth programs. By amending the requirements in the statutes relating to the STIP, this bill effectively runs contrary to the voter's approval of Proposition 42, which dedicated sales tax on gas for specific purposes. We are actively opposing this bill for RCTC and SANBAG. SB 1262 was placed on the Senate Appropriations Suspense File on April 29, 2002, and at the Suspense file hearing, the bill was retained in committee. Other Transportation Items Planning and Conservation League (PCL) Initiative The PCL recently received certification by the Secretary of Sate for their initiative for the November 2002 ballot that would dedicate one third of the sales tax revenues the state derives for transportation and environmental purposes. The initiative would generate $950 million to $1 billion annually, growing with vehicle sales and price inflation. A review of the programs funded by the initiative indicates that approximately one third of the program would fund highway oriented transportation projects, with the balance reserved for transit, school bus 000075; replacement and a host of natural conservancies, with the latter justified as generic • mitigation for transportation improvement impacts. 000076 " " " ( D a v i d l u r c h a n d Y l s s o c i a t e s T O : D a r r e n K e t t l e F R O M : M a r i l y n C a m p b e l l D A T E : J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 2 R E : C o n g r e s s i o n a l A c t i v i t y A p p r o p r i a t i o n s N o m a r k - u p s h a v e b e e n s c h e d u l e d a t t h i s t i m e f o r t h e F Y 2 0 0 3 a p p r o p r i a t i o n s c y c l e . H o u s e A p p r o p r i a t i o n s C o m m i t t e e s t a f f h a v e i n d i c a t e d t h e s e b i l l s w i l l n o t m o v e f o r w a r d u n t i l a c t i o n o n t h e e m e r g e n c y s u p p l e m e n t a l a p p r o p r i a t i o n s b i l l h a s b e e n c o m p l e t e d . T h e s u p p l e m e n t a l b i l l p a s s e d t h e H o u s e o n M a y 2 4 b y a v o t e o f 2 8 0 t o 1 3 8 . T h e l e g i s l a t i o n i s c u r r e n t l y b e i n g d e b a t e d o n t h e f l o o r o f t h e S e n a t e . H o u s e a n d S e n a t e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a p p r o p r i a t i o n s s u b c o m m i t t e e s a r e n o t l i k e l y t o m a r k - u p t h e i r F Y 2 0 0 3 f u n d i n g b i l l s u n t i l s o m e t i m e i n J u l y . C o r r e s p o n d i n g l y , w e w i l l s c h e d u l e a p p o i n t m e n t s a n d a c c o m p a n y D a r r e n K e t t l e t o m e e t i n g s w i t h M e m b e r s a n d s t a f f d u r i n g h i s t r i p h e r e i n J u l y b e f o r e t h e m a r k - u p s b e g i n t o f o l l o w - u p o n a l l R C T C / S A N B A G f u n d i n g r e q u e s t s . W e c o n t a c t e d t h e o f f i c e s o f R e p r e s e n t a t i v e s J o e B a c a , D a v i d D r e i e r , J e r r y L e w i s a n d M a r y B o n o t o g a r n e r s u p p o r t f o r t h e R C T C / S A N B A G r e q u e s t f o r $ 3 m i l l i o n f o r t h e I n l a n d E m p i r e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t C e n t e r . 5 1 7 2 n d S T R E E T , N O R T H E A S T , W A S H I N G T O N , D . C . 2 0 0 0 2 ( 2 0 2 ) 5 4 3 - 3 7 4 4 0 0 0 0 7 7 AGENDA ITEM 7D • " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e D a r r e n K e t t l e , D i r e c t o r o f I n t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l a n d L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : R e q u e s t f o r P r o p o s a l f o r R C T C / S A N B A G S h a r e d S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l A d v o c a t e s B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A p p r o v e t h e r e l e a s e o f t w o R e q u e s t s f o r P r o p o s a l s ( R F P ) t o b e p r o v i d e d f r o m N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 2 t o N o v e m b e r 2 0 0 6 ; a ) S t a t e a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s ( S A N B A G R F P N o . 0 3 - 0 0 8 ) b ) F e d e r a l a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s ( S A N B A G R F P N o . 0 3 - 0 0 7 ) ; a n d , 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r m a n a n d 1 s t V i c e - C h a i r m a n t o p a r t i c i p a t e a s v o t i n g m e m b e r s o f t h e S e l e c t i o n C o m m i t t e e . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n N o v e m b e r 1 9 9 9 , t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) a n d t h e S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s ( S A N B A G ) a p p r o v e d e n t e r i n g i n t o " s h a r e d " a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s c o n t r a c t s w i t h D a v i d T u r c h a n d A s s o c i a t e s , a n d C l i f f M a d i s o n - G o v e r n m e n t R e l a t i o n s I n c . , f o r f e d e r a l a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s , a n d S m i t h , K e m p t o n & W a t t s f o r s t a t e a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s . I n S e p t e m b e r 2 0 0 0 , t h e S A N B A G B o a r d e x e r c i s e d a t w o - y e a r o p t i o n o n b o t h c o n t r a c t s , t o a l i g n t h e c o n t r a c t s w i t h t h e t w o - y e a r f e d e r a l C o n g r e s s i o n a l a n d S t a t e L e g i s l a t i v e s e s s i o n c a l e n d a r s . T h e f e d e r a l a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s c o n t r a c t e x p i r e s N o v e m b e r 1 , 2 0 0 2 , a n d t h e s t a t e a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s c o n t r a c t e x p i r e s O c t o b e r 1 , 2 0 0 2 . T h e c u r r e n t c o n t r a c t a m o u n t s a r e $ 1 1 2 , 0 0 0 p e r y e a r f o r f e d e r a l a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s , a n d $ 9 7 , 5 0 0 p e r y e a r f o r s t a t e a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s . S A N B A G a n d R C T C c o n t r i b u t e e q u a l l y t o t h e c o s t o f e a c h c o n t r a c t . S t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t S A N B A G a n d R C T C c o n t i n u e t h e j o i n t a d v o c a c y a r r a n g e m e n t , a n d i s s u e R F P ' s f o r s h a r e d S t a t e a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s , a n d s h a r e d F e d e r a l a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s . A t t a c h e d f o r r e v i e w i s t h e d r a f t R F P a n d s c o p e o f w o r k . T h e R F P r e q u e s t s s u b m i t t i n g t w o f e e p r o p o s a l s ; o n e s h o u l d t h e f i r m p r o v i d e I t e m 7 D 0 0 0 0 7 8 service to RCTC or SANBAG individually, or two, should the firm provide the service in a shared capacity as is currently the case. If either board does not approve this recommendation, the scope of work will be refined to reflect a request for proposal for service provision to RCTC only. Should both the RCTC and SANBAG boards approve this approach, staff recommends that a staff Review Committee composed of government affairs staff from Southern California transportation agencies be formed. The staff Review Committee would forward a short-list (2-3 firms) to a joint RCTC/SANBAG Selection Committee composed of two members of each board (RCTC Chairperson and 1St Vice Chairperson and the SANBAG President and Vice President). The RCTC and SANBAG Executive Directors and the RCTC/SANBAG Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs would participate in the deliberations but not vote. The selected firms will be approved by both the SANBAG and RCTC governing bodies, but will be under contract with SANBAG. RCTC will be invoiced quarterly for half the contract costs. To coincide with the State and Federal legislative schedules this contract would be for two, two-year Congressional and State Legislative Sessions with an option to extend the contract, one additional two-year session by action of both governing boards. Therefore, as stated in the recommendation, both the State advocacy services and the Federal advocacy services contracts would provide for services from November 1, 2002 to October 31, 2006, andmaybe extended by option to October 31, 2008. Attachments: 1) SANBAG RFP No: 03-007 2) SANBAG RFP No: 03-008 3) Scope of Services State Advocacy Services 4) Scope of Services Federal Advocacy Services 5) State Legislative Advocacy 6) Contract Lobbyist of APTA Member Organizations • • ItoemQ7 O9 " " " R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n / S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s S A N B A G C o n t r a c t R F P N o : 0 3 - 0 0 7 F e d e r a l A d v o c a c y S e r v i c e s R e q u e s t f o r P r o p o s a l I n t r o d u c t i o n T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) i s a c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c y g o v e r n e d b y t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o f t h e t w e n t y f o u r c i t i e s a n d t h e f i v e m e m b e r s o f t h e B o a r d o f S u p e r v i s o r s w i t h i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . T h e S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s ( S A N B A G ) i s a C o u n c i l o f G o v e r n m e n t s a n d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c y , g o v e r n e d b y t h e m a y o r s o f t w e n t y - f o u r c i t i e s a n d t h e f i v e m e m b e r s o f t h e B o a r d o f S u p e r v i s o r s w i t h i n S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y . B o t h R C T C a n d S A N B A G p r o v i d e s h o r t a n d l o n g - t e r m p l a n n i n g s e r v i c e s r e l a t i n g t o t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , a i r q u a l i t y , c o n g e s t i o n m a n a g e m e n t , a n d f r e e w a y c a l l b o x e s . R C T C a n d S A N B A G b o t h a l l o c a t e L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d s a n d t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e f u n d s p r o v i d e d f o r s u p p o r t o f p u b l i c t r a n s i t a n d l o c a l s t r e e t s . R C T C a n d S A N B A G e a c h a r e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y M e a s u r e A a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y M e a s u r e I , t h e v o t e r - a p p r o v e d h a l f c e n t t r a n s p o r t a t i o n t r a n s a c t i o n s a n d u s e t a x e s w h i c h w i l l h a v e g e n e r a t e d o v e r 3 b i l l i o n d o l l a r s t h r o u g h t h e y e a r 2 0 0 9 f o r f u n d i n g m a j o r f r e e w a y c o n s t r u c t i o n , c o m m u t e r r a i l s e r v i c e s , l o c a l s t r e e t a n d r o a d i m p r o v e m e n t s , s p e c i a l i z e d t r a n s i t s e r v i c e f o r t h e e l d e r l y a n d p e r s o n s w i t h d i s a b i l i t i e s p o p u l a t i o n a n d t r a f f i c m a n a g e m e n t a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l e n h a n c e m e n t e f f o r t s . I n A u g u s t 1 9 9 8 , R C T C a n d S A N B A G e n g a g e d i n a n i n n o v a t i v e s t a f f i n g e f f o r t w i t h t h e c r e a t i o n o f t h e s h a r e d p o s i t i o n o f D i r e c t o r o f I n t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l a n d L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s . I n 1 9 9 9 t h e t w o a g e n c i e s a g r e e d t o a s e c o n d i n n o v a t i v e e f f o r t b y c o m b i n i n g F e d e r a l a d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s i n o n e c o n t r a c t . T o d a t e , t h i s e f f o r t h a s p r o v e n b e n e f i c i a l t o b o t h a g e n c i e s . T h u s , t h e i n t e n t o f t h i s R F P i s t o c o n t i n u e t h i s e f f o r t t h r o u g h r e t a i n i n g a f i r m t o p r o v i d e F e d e r a l A d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s t o b o t h R C T C a n d S A N B A G u n d e r t h e s a m e c o n t r a c t . A s i s c u r r e n t l y t h e c a s e w i t h t h e S h a r e d p o s i t i o n o f D i r e c t o r o f I n t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l a n d L e g i s l a t i v e A f f a i r s , S A N B A G w i l l f u n c t i o n a s t h e a d m i n i s t e r i n g a g e n c y a n d R C T C w i l l r e i m b u r s e S A N B A G f o r a l l c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e c o n t r a c t . R C T C a n d S A N B A G w i l l m a k e e v e r y e f f o r t t o a d m i n i s t e r t h e p r o p o s a l p r o c e s s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t e r m s a n d d a t e s o u t l i n e d i n t h i s R F P ; h o w e v e r , R C T C a n d S A N B A G r e s e r v e t h e r i g h t t o m o d i f y t h e a c t i v i t i e s , t i m e l i n e a n d a n y o t h e r a s p e c t o f t h e p r o c e s s a t a n y t i m e i t i s d e e m e d n e c e s s a r y . B y r e q u e s t i n g p r o p o s a l s R C T C a n d S A N B A G a r e i n n o w a y o b l i g a t e d t o a w a r d a c o n t r a c t o r p a y t h e e x p e n s e s o f p r o p o s i n g f i r m s i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o r s u b m i s s i o n o f a p r o p o s a l . R F P 0 3 0 0 7 . D O C 0 0 0 0 SANBAG Contract RFP No: 03-007 State Advocacy Services Request for Proposal Page 2 The awarding of a contract shall be contingent upon the availability of funds and the requisite staff and board approvals. The decision to award any contract to a particular firm shall be based on the criteria listed in this RFP and any other pertinent factors that may come to the attention of the evaluators. No single factor will determine the final award decision. RFP and Proposal Schedule RCTC and SANBAG intend to follow the schedule described below during the procurement process for Federal Advocacy Services, but reserves the right to alter the schedule at any time. ACTIVITY Release of RFP Questions Due from Firms Proposal Due Date Evaluation By Staff Committee Interview and Evaluation by Joint Board Committee Recommendation Submittal to SANBAG Board Recommendation Submittal to RCTC Board Award of Contract Evaluation Process and Criteria DATE July 12, 2002 August 2, 2002 August 9, 2002 August 21, 2002 September 12, 2002 October 2, 2002 October 9, 2002 October 10, 2002 Proposals will be reviewed by a staff evaluation committee composed of legislative affairs staff from transportation entities in the region. The charge of the evaluation committee will be to review and score every proposal, based on the criteria described in this RFP. Following its evaluation, the committee shall develop a short-list (2-4) firms for review and development of a final recommendation from a Joint Board Committee to the RCTC and SANBAG Boards for consideration. The Joint Board Committee shall be composed of two representatives (the Chair and Vice -Chair) of each board. If the committee desires, interviews with the short-list candidates may be required. The Joint Board Committee shall recommend the firm to be selected for Federal Advocacy services. This recommendation shall be considered by both the RCTC and SANBAG boards for ultimate approval or rejection. Proposers should be aware that either the Joint Committee or one or both Boards may decide not to enter into a contract for shared Federal Advocacy services and thus may award contracts for separate representation for either RCTC or SANBAG. RFP03007.DOC 000081 SANBAG Contract RFP No: 03-007 State Advocacy Services Request for Proposal Page 3 Evaluation Criteria The primary basis for evaluation will be the qualification of the firm and the firm's understanding of the work required based on the Scope of Services described in this RFP. To assist in the evaluators' understanding of the firm's qualifications and understanding of the work performed, proposers are requested to respond to the following: 1. List all Federal legislators in general as well as those on key transportation related committees with whom your firm has worked closely in the past two (2) years; 2. List all clients you presently represent on transportation matters, and for each indicate whether or not you feel there could be a conflict of interest; 3. Describe your firm's familiarity with transportation finance, transportation planning, transit, commuter rail and other areas of RCTC/SANBAG interest; 4. Describe the resources (staff and other means) your firm has to perform the scope of services; 5. Describe how your firm would approach the scope of services described in this RFP; 6. List any political affiliations or professional associations the firm has. 7. Describe the relevant education and experience of key staff to be assigned to this contract; 8. Outline the availability of each key staff, in approximate hours per month, to work on RCTC/SANBAG; 9. For each key staff to be assigned to RCTC/SANBAG work, please list three client references with their telephone numbers. Cost Proposal Cost proposals must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope no later than 12:00 p.m. (Noon) PDT on Friday, August 9, 2002. The cost proposals will not be reviewed by the Staff Evaluation Committee. Cost information will be ranked from highest to lowest and submitted to the Joint Board Committee for consideration. Each board reserves the right to separate and instead enter into a contract with the firm of its choice. Therefore, please submit a cost proposal for: • 1. One year Federal Advocacy services provided jointly to RCTC and SANBAG under one contract; 2. One year Federal Advocacy services provided solely to RCTC; and 3. One year Federal Advocacy services provided solely to SANBAG. RFP03007.DOC 000082 SANBAG Contract RFP No: 03-007 State Advocacy Services Request for Proposal Page 4 Basis of Award Any contract resulting from this RFP will be awarded based upon demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications and capabilities necessary for the performance of services required at a fair and reasonable price to RCTC and SANBAG. Type of Contract RCTC and SANBAG intend to award a Fixed Price contract. Under no circumstances will the Not -to -Exceed price be exceeded without the express written consent of RCTC and SANBAG. As is currently the case with the Shared position of Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs, SANBAG will function as the administering agency and RCTC will reimburse SANBAG for all costs associated with the contract. The contract will be for four years of service and may include a two-year option at its conclusion. RFP03007.DOC 000083 Riverside County Transportation Commission/San Bernardino Associated Governments SANBAG Contract RFP No: 03-008 State Advocacy Services Request for Proposal Introduction The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is a county transportation planning agency governed by the representatives of the twenty four cities and the five members of the Board of Supervisors within Riverside County. The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) is a Council of Governments and transportation planning agency, governed by the mayors of twenty-four cities and the five members of the Board of Supervisors within San Bernardino County. Both RCTC and SANBAG provide short and long-term planning services relating to transportation, air quality, congestion management, and freeway call boxes. RCTC and SANBAG both allocate Local Transportation Funds and the State Transit Assistance funds provided for support of public transit and local streets. RCTC and SANBAG each are responsible for the administration of Riverside County Measure A and San Bernardino County Measure I, the voter -approved half cent transportation transactions and use taxes which will have generated over 3 billion dollars through the year 2009 for funding major freeway •construction, commuter rail services, local street and road improvements, specialized transit service for the elderly and persons with disabilities population and traffic management and environmental enhancement efforts. In August 1998, RCTC and SANBAG engaged in an innovative staffing effort with the creation of the shared position of Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs. In 1999 the two agencies agreed to a second innovative effort by combining state advocacy services in one contract. To date, this effort has proven beneficial to both agencies. Thus, the intent of this RFP is to continue this effort through retaining a firm to provide State Advocacy services to both RCTC and SANBAG under the same contract. As is currently the case with the shared position of Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs, SANBAG will function as the administering agency and RCTC will reimburse SANBAG for all costs associated with the contract. RCTC and SANBAG will make every effort to administer the proposal process in accordance with terms and dates outlined in this RFP; however, RCTC and SANBAG reserve the right to modify the activities, timeline and any other aspect of the process at any time it is deemed necessary. By requesting proposals RCTC and SANBAG are in no way obligated to award a contract or pay the expenses of proposing firms in connection with the preparation or submission of a proposal. RFP03008.DOC 000084 SANBAG Contract RFP No: 03-008 State Advocacy Services Request for Proposal Page 2 The awarding of a contract shall be contingent upon the availability of funds and the requisite staff and board approvals. The decision to award any contract to a particular firm shall be based on the criteria listed in this RFP and any other pertinent factors that may come to the attention of the evaluators. No single factor will determine the final award decision. RFP and Proposal Schedule RCTC and SANBAG intend to follow the schedule described below during the procurement process for State Advocacy Services, but reserves the right to alter the schedule at any time. ACTIVITY Release of RFP Questions Due from Firms Proposal Due Date Evaluation By Staff Committee Interview and Evaluation by Joint Board Committee Recommendation Submittal to SANBAG Board Recommendation Submittal to RCTC Board Award of Contract Evaluation Process and Criteria DATE July 12, 2002 August 2 2002 August 9, 2002 August 21, 2002 September 12, 2002 October 2, 2002 October 9, 2002 October 10, 2002 Proposals will be reviewed by a staff evaluation committee composed of legislative affairs staff from transportation entities in the region. The charge of the evaluation committee will be to review and score every proposal, based on the criteria described in this RFP. Following its evaluation, the committee shall develop a short-list (2-4) firms for review and development of a final recommendation from a Joint Board Committee to the RCTC and SANBAG Boards for consideration. The Joint Board Committee shall be composed of two representatives (the Chair and Vice -Chair) of each board. If the committee desires, interviews with the short-list candidates may be required. The Joint Board Committee shall recommend the firm to be selected for State Advocacy services. This recommendation shall be considered by both the RCTC and SANBAG boards for ultimate approval or rejection. Proposers should be aware that either the Joint Committee or one or both Boards may decide not to enter into a contract for shared State Advocacy services and thus may award contracts for separate representation for either RCTC or SANBAG. RFPO3008.DOC 0000$5 " " " S A N B A G C o n t r a c t R F P N o : 0 3 - 0 0 8 S t a t e A d v o c a c y S e r v i c e s R e q u e s t f o r P r o p o s a l P a g e 3 E v a l u a t i o n C r i t e r i a T h e p r i m a r y b a s i s f o r e v a l u a t i o n w i l l b e t h e q u a l i f i c a t i o n o f t h e f i r m a n d t h e f i r m ' s u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e w o r k r e q u i r e d b a s e d o n t h e S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s d e s c r i b e d i n t h i s R F P . T o a s s i s t i n t h e e v a l u a t o r s ' u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e f i r m ' s q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e w o r k p e r f o r m e d , p r o p o s e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o r e s p o n d t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : 1 . L i s t a l l S t a t e l e g i s l a t o r s i n g e n e r a l a s w e l l a s t h o s e o n k e y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n r e l a t e d c o m m i t t e e s w i t h w h o m y o u r f i r m h a s w o r k e d c l o s e l y i n t h e p a s t t w o ( 2 ) y e a r s ; 2 . L i s t a l l c l i e n t s y o u p r e s e n t l y r e p r e s e n t o n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m a t t e r s , a n d f o r e a c h i n d i c a t e w h e t h e r o r n o t y o u f e e l t h e r e c o u l d b e a c o n f l i c t o f i n t e r e s t ; 3 . D e s c r i b e y o u r f i r m ' s f a m i l i a r i t y w i t h t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f i n a n c e , t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g , t r a n s i t , c o m m u t e r r a i l a n d o t h e r a r e a s o f R C T C / S A N B A G i n t e r e s t ; 4 . D e s c r i b e t h e r e s o u r c e s ( s t a f f a n d o t h e r m e a n s ) y o u r f i r m h a s t o p e r f o r m t h e s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s ; 5 . D e s c r i b e h o w y o u r f i r m w o u l d a p p r o a c h t h e s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s d e s c r i b e d i n t h i s R F P ; 6 . L i s t a n y p o l i t i c a l a f f i l i a t i o n s - o r p r o f e s s i o n a l a s s o c i a t i o n s t h e f i r m h a s . 7 . D e s c r i b e t h e r e l e v a n t e d u c a t i o n a n d e x p e r i e n c e o f k e y s t a f f t o b e a s s i g n e d t o t h i s c o n t r a c t ; 8 . O u t l i n e t h e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f e a c h k e y s t a f f , i n a p p r o x i m a t e h o u r s p e r m o n t h , t o w o r k o n R C T C / S A N B A G ; 9 . F o r e a c h k e y s t a f f t o b e a s s i g n e d t o R C T C / S A N B A G w o r k , p l e a s e l i s t t h r e e c l i e n t r e f e r e n c e s w i t h t h e i r t e l e p h o n e n u m b e r s . C o s t P r o p o s a l C o s t p r o p o s a l s m u s t b e s u b m i t t e d i n a s e p a r a t e s e a l e d e n v e l o p e n o l a t e r t h a n 1 2 : 0 0 p . m . ( N o o n ) P D T o n F r i d a y , A u g u s t 9 , 2 0 0 2 . T h e c o s t p r o p o s a l s w i l l n o t b e r e v i e w e d b y t h e S t a f f E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e . C o s t i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l b e r a n k e d f r o m h i g h e s t t o l o w e s t a n d s u b m i t t e d t o t h e J o i n t B o a r d C o m m i t t e e f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n . E a c h b o a r d r e s e r v e s t h e r i g h t t o s e p a r a t e a n d i n s t e a d e n t e r i n t o a c o n t r a c t w i t h t h e f i r m o f i t s c h o i c e . T h e r e f o r e , p l e a s e s u b m i t a c o s t p r o p o s a l f o r : 1 . O n e y e a r S t a t e A d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d j o i n t l y t o R C T C a n d S A N B A G u n d e r o n e c o n t r a c t ; 2 . O n e y e a r S t a t e A d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d s o l e l y t o R C T C ; a n d 3 . O n e y e a r S t a t e A d v o c a c y s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e d s o l e l y t o S A N B A G . R F P 0 3 0 0 8 . D O C c ) 3 0 5 3 R SANBAG Contract RFP No: 03-008 State Advocacy Services Request for Proposal Page 4 Basis of Award Any contract resulting from this RFP will be awarded based upon demonstrated competence and on the professional qualifications and capabilities necessary for the performance of services required at a fair and reasonable price to RCTC and SANBAG. Type of Contract RCTC and SANBAG intend to award a Fixed Price contract. Under no circumstances will the Not -to -Exceed price be exceeded without the express written consent of RCTC and SANBAG. As is currently the case with the Shared position of Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs, SANBAG will function as the administering agency and RCTC will reimburse SANBAG for all costs associated with the contract. The contract will be for four years of service and may include a two-year option at its conclusion. RFP03008.DOC 000087 " " S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n / S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s S t a t e A d v o c a c y S e r v i c e s O v e r a l l G o a l S u c c e s s f u l l y a c h i e v e t h e i n t e n d e d r e s u l t s o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n / S a n B e r n a r d i n o A s s o c i a t e d G o v e r n m e n t s ( R C T C / S A N B A G ) S t a t e L e g i s l a t i v e P r o g r a m . C o n t i n u e t o e s t a b l i s h a n d m a i n t a i n p o s i t i v e w o r k i n g r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y S t a t e L e g i s l a t i v e d e l e g a t i o n a n d m e m b e r s o f t h e g u b e r n a t o r i a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n . R e q u i r e d T a s k s / A c t i v i t i e s T a s k s w i l l i n c l u d e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o t h e f o l l o w i n g : R o u t i n e l y c o m m u n i c a t e w i t h d e l e g a t i o n m e m b e r s , a n d m e m b e r s o f r e l a t e d A s s e m b l y o r S e n a t e C o m m i t t e e s o n l e g i s l a t i o n s p o n s o r e d b y R C T C a n d l e g i s l a t i v e p o s i t i o n s a d o p t e d i n r e s p o n s e t o s p e c i f i c l e g i s l a t i v e o r b u d g e t p r o p o s a l s . T h i s w i l l o c c u r t h r o u g h b o t h w r i t t e n a n d o r a l c o m m u n i c a t i o n . P r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n , c o p i e s o f i n t r o d u c e d l e g i s l a t i o n , r e l e v a n t t e s t i m o n y a n d a n y a n a l y s i s o f l e g i s l a t i o n r e l a t i v e t o R C T C / S A N B A G . C o o r d i n a t i o n o f a d v o c a c y e f f o r t s t h a t m a y i n c l u d e t e s t i m o n y b y t h e s e l e c t e d f i r m = s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s , a n d / o r R C T C / S A N B A G B o a r d m e m b e r a n d / o r s t a f f . A d v i s e a n d a s s i s t R C T C / S A N B A G i n d e v e l o p i n g s t r a t e g y o n l e g i s l a t i o n , r e g u l a t i o n s a n d a c t i o n s c o n t e m p l a t e d a t a n y g o v e r n m e n t l e v e l . A s s i s t w i t h t h e d e v e l o p m e n t , a t t e n d a n c e a n d p r o g r a m m i n g o f a L e g i s l a t i v e S t a f f T o u r / L u n c h e o n f o r d e l e g a t i o n m e m b e r s t a f f t o b e h e l d i n b o t h S a c r a m e n t o a n d / o r R i v e r s i d e a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y . P r o v i d e a w r i t t e n m o n t h l y u p d a t e t o t h e R C T C / S A N B A G B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s w h i c h s u m m a r i z e s t h e f i r m = s m o s t r e c e n t e f f o r t s o n b e h a l f o f R C T C / S A N B A G , i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o : t e s t i m o n y b e f o r e c o m m i t t e e , i n d i v i d u a l m e e t i n g s w i t h L e g i s l a t o r s , a n d w r i t t e n c o r r e s p o n d e n c e o n b e h a l f o f R C T C / S A N B A G . T h i s r e p o r t s h a l l a l s o c o n t a i n a n y r e l e v a n t i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e L e g i s l a t u r e = s a c t i v i t i e s / p r o g r e s s o n m o v i n g l e g i s l a t i o n , a d o p t i n g a b u d g e t , a n d g e n e r a l a c t i v i t i e s o r a c t i o n o f S t a t e g o v e r n m e n t t h a t c o u l d i m p a c t R C T C / S A N B A G = s i n t e r e s t s . P r o v i d e o r a l r e p o r t s t o t h e R C T C / S A N B A G B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s t h a t o f f e r i n s i g h t i n t o t h e a c t i v i t i e s o f t h e L e g i s l a t u r e a s t h e y r e l a t e t o t h e R C T C / S A N B A G L e g i s l a t i v e P r o g r a m . T h e d a t e s o f t h e s e v i s i t s w i l l b e d e t e r m i n e d a t a l a t e r d a t e , b a s e d u p o n t h e L e g i s l a t i v e S e s s i o n C a l e n d a r . " S O S 0 2 0 6 1 2 - D M K . D O C 0 0 0 0 8 8 Scope of Services Riverside County Transportation Commission/San Bernardino Associated Governments Federal Advocacy Services Overall Goal Successfully achieve the intended results of the Riverside County Transportation Commission/San Bernardino Associated Governments (RCTC/SANBAG) Federal Legislative Program. Continue to establish and maintain positive working relationships with the Riverside and San Bernardino County Congressional delegation and Administration staff. Required Tasks/Activities Tasks will include, but not be limited to the following: Routinely communicate with delegation members, and members of related House or Senate Committees on legislation sponsored by RCTC/SANBAG and legislative positions adopted in response to specific legislative or budget proposals. This will occur through both written and oral communication. Provide information, copies of introduced legislation, relevant testimony and any analysis of legislation relative to RCTC/SANBAG. Coordination of advocacy efforts that may include testimony by the selected firm's representatives, and/or RCTC/SANBAG Board member and/or staff. Advise and assist RCTC/SANBAG in developing strategy on legislation, regulations and actions contemplated at any government level. Assist with the development, attendance, and programming of a Legislative StaffTour/Luncheon for delegation member staff to be held in Riverside County and/or San Bernardino County. Provide a written monthly update to the RCTC/SANBAG Board of Directors which summarizes the firm=s most recent efforts on behalf of RCTC/SANBAG, including but not limited to: testimony before committee, individual meetings with Legislators, and written correspondence on behalf of RCTC/SANBAG. This report shall also contain any relevant information regarding the Legislature=s activities/progress on moving legislation, adopting a budget, and general activities or action of Federal government that could impact RCTC/SANBAG=s interests. SOS020612-DMK.DOC 000089 State Legislative Advocacy MR. MICHAEL ARNOLD aiRNOLD & ASSOCIATES 127 11TH STREET SUITE 820 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. JOHN ARRIAGA JEA & ASSOCIATES 980 9TH ST., #2200 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. JAMES BRUNER ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE 400 CAPITOL MALL, #3000 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. GREGG COOK GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS CONSULTING 1127 11TH ST., #700 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MS. KATHRYN DONOVAN PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP 400 CAPITOL MALL BITE 1700 ACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. TIM EGAN CAPITAL REPRESENTATION GROUP 1127 - 11TH STREET STE. 1003 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. JOHN FORMAN NOSSAMAN, GUTHENER, KNOW & ELLIOTT 915 "L" STREET SUITE 1000 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. JAMES GROSS NIELSEN, MERKSAMER, PARRINELLO, MUELLER & NAYLOR LLP 770 "L" STREET SUITE 800 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 • SLA0206-DMK.DOC Page 1 MR. ROGER GWINN THE FERGUSON GROUP, L.L.C. 1434 3RD STREET SUITE 3 NAPA, CA 94559 MR. CELESTE HERITAGE ADVOCATION, INC. 1121 "L" STREET, SUITE 610 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. S. THOMAS KONOVALOFF A -K ASSOCIATES, INC. 925 "L" STREET SUITE 1185 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. JOSEPH LANG LANG, HANSEN, O'MALLEY & MILLER 915 L STREET., #1280 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. ALLAN LIND JR. LIND & ASSOCIATES 400 CAPITOL MALL SUITE 900 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MS. LINDA MORSHED MORSHED AND ASSOCIATES 915 L ST., SUITE 1000 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. RUSSELL NOACK HEIM, NOACK, KELLY & SPAHNN 1121 L STREET, #100 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. RALPH OCHOA OCHOA & SILLAS 400 CAPITOL MALL, #1850 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. JOHN O'MALLEY LANG, HANSEN, O'MALLEY & MILLER 915 L STREET., #1280 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 0Po090. State Legislative Advocacy MR. DONALD PETERSON PETERSON CONSULTING, INC. 1414 "K" STREET SUITE 300 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. PHILLIP SCHOTT SCHOTT, INC. 1510 14TH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SLA0206-DMK.DOC Page 2 MS. KATHLEEN SNODGRASS CARPENTER, SNODGRASS & ASSOCIATES 1201 "K" STREET SUITE 710 SACRAMENTO, CA 95815 MR. LYNN SUTER SUTER & ASSOCIATES 1127 11TH STREET SUITE 512 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 MR. PAUL YODER SHAW/YODER, INC. 1414 "K" STREET SUITE 320 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 000091 Contract Lobbyist of Al Member Org anizatio ns • # Title FirstName L astName Compa ny Addressl City ST Zip 1. Mr . Tony Anderson Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mell ott, LLC 1250 24th Street, NW Suite 700 Washi ngton DC 20037 2. Ms . Terry Bevels N/A 1317 F Street, NW Washington DC 20004 3• Mr . Leon Billings L eo n G. Billings, Inc. 901 15th Street, N .W. Washi ngt on DC 20005 4• Mr . David Bieging ` Dorsey and Whitney 1001 Pennsylva nia Ave nue NW Washington DC 20004 5. Mr. Jeff Boothe Holland & Knight, LLP Suite 400 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washingto n DC 20037 6. Mr. John Brimsek Mulle nholz, Brivasek & Belair 1150 Connecticut Aven ue, NW Washi ngton DC 20036 7, Mr. Thomas J. Bulger Go vernment Relatio ns, Inc. 1050 17th Street, NW Washington DC 20036 8. Mr. David Turch David Turch & Associates 517 Second Street, NE Washington DC 20002 9. Ms. Ashli Carpi Chambers, Conlon & Hartwell 122 C Street, NW Suite 850 Washington DC 20001 10. Ms. Carolyn C. Chaney Cha ney & Associates, Inc. 1401 K Street, NW Suite 700 Washington DC 20005 11. Mr. John Cli ne C2 Group, LLC 101 Co nstitution Avenue, NW Suite 900 Washington DC 20001 12. Mr. Jim Copeland Copela nd, Lowery & Jacquez 1341 G Street, NW Suite 200 Washington DC 20005 13. Mr. Jo hn J. Corbett Spiegel & McDiarmid 1350 New York Avenue, NW Washington DC 20005 14. Mr. Daniel M. Crane Campbell -Cra ne 1010 Pennsyl vania Avenue, SE Washington DC 20003 15. Ms. Dana Crawfo rd Palton, Boggs — RTA New Orleans 2550 M Street, NW 9th fl oor Washi ngton DC 20037 16. Mr. Tom Dawson Smith, Dawson & Associates 1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 104 Washi ngt on DC 20036 17, Mr. Bill Deitz Palumbo and Cerrell 1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 500 Washington DC 20036 18. Mr. Dennis Dwyer Verner, Llipfert, Bernhard, McPherson, & Han d 901 15 1 Street, NW Washington DC 20005 19, Mr. William H. Edin gton Edingto n, Peel & Associates, Inc. 1317 F Street, NW Suite 200 Washington DC 20004 20. Mr. Kevin Farrell Baker & Botts, L.L.P. 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington DC 20004 21. Mr. Jo hn Gaughan Bracy -Williams & Company 601 13th Street, NW Washington DC 20006 22. Mr. Edward J. Gill, Jr. Thompson Coburn LLP 1909 K Street, NW Suite 600 Washington DC 20037 23. Mr. Chuck Graves N /A 1660 L Street, NW, Suite 1050 Washi ngton DC 20036 24. Mr. W. Jack Hargett N/A 1968 Crescent Park Drive Rest on VA 20190 25. Mr. Roger Honberger Roger Honberger & Associates 440 First Street, NW Suite 430 Washington DC 20001 26. Mr. Torn Howarth Peyser Associates, In c. 1001 G Street, NW Washington DC 20001 27. Mr. Jefferey Jac obs Sullivan & Cromwell 1701 Pennsylva nia Ave., NW Suite 800 Washington DC 20006 28. Ms.. Pat Jordan Jordan & Associates, Inc. 1401 K Street, N .W., S uite 700 Washington DC 20005 Page 1 000092 Contract Lobbyist of APTA Member Organizations # Title FirstName LastName Compa ny Addressl City ST Zip 29. Mr. Edward Kinghom Kinghorn & Associates 900 2°d Street, NE Suite 201 Washington DC 20002 30. Mr. John Lagomarcino Linton, Mields, Reisler & Cotton 1299 Pen nsylvania Avenue, NW — 81 floor West Washington DC 20004 31. Ms . Susan Lent Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld 1333 New Hampshire Avenue NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20036 32. Mr. Roger Lindberg Ogilvy & Adams 1901 L Street, NW Suite 300 Washi ngton DC 20036 33. Mr. Tim Lo vain Denny Miller Associates 400 N. Capitol Street, NW Suite 363 Washington DC 20001 34. Ms. Charmayne Macon The Ferguso n Group 1130 Connectic ut Avenue, NW Suite 300 Washington DC 20036 35. Mr. Cliff Madison Government Relations, Inc. 254 — A Maryland Avenue, NE Washington DC 20002 36. M r. Daniel C. Maldonado 1101 17th Street Suite 803 Washington DC 20036 37. Mr. Kris Mar Trucker & Associates 1350 I Street, NW Suite 870 Washington DC 20005 38. Mr. Pat McCann McCan n Capitol Ad vocates, Suite 500 700 13th Street, NW Suite 500 Washington DC 20005 39. Ms. Carolin a L. Mederos Patton, B oggs, L.L.P . Cincinnati 2550 M Street, NW Washington DC 20037 40. Ms. Dena Morris Sagamore Associates 805 15 1 Street, NW Suite 700 Washington DC 20005 41. M s. Christine Mullick Kogovsek and Associates 700 Broadway Suite 929 Denver CO 80203 42. Ms. Don N orden Chambers, Conlo n & Hartwell 122 C Street, NW Suite 850 Washington DC 20001 43. Mr. John O'D onnell Murray Scheer 1200 New Hampshire A ve. NW Suite 430 Washington DC 20036 44. Mr. Peter Peyser Peyser Associates, Inc . 1001 G Street NW, Suite 400E Washington DC 20001 45. Ms. Janet Powell Baker Donelson 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 800 Washington DC 20004 46. Mr. Doug Richardson Winston & Strawn 1440 L Street, NW Washington DC 20005 47. Mr. William Art Roberts The Jefferson Group 1341 g Street, NW Suite 1100 Washington DC 20005 48. Mr. Pau l Schlesringer Altalde & Fay 2111 Wilson Blvd. S uite 850 Arlington VA 22201 49. Mr. Len Simon Simon and Compan y 1660 L Street, NW, Suite 1050 Washington DC 20036 50. Mr. Peter Stone Black, Kelley, Scruggs & Healy 1804 K Street, NW Suite 901L Washington DC 20006 51. Ms. Jane Sutter Starke Eckert, Seamans, Cherin & Mellott, LLC 1250 24 1 Street, NW Suite 700 Washington DC 20037 52. Ms. Tracy Tucker Bracy Williams & Company 601 13 1 Street, NW Suite 900 S Washington DC 20005 53. Mr. Dennis C. V ierra V ierra Associates 1825 Eye Street, NW, S uite 400 Washingto n DC 20006 54, Mr, Ron Waterman Waterman & Associates 900 Second Street, NW Suite 109 Washington DC 20002 55. Ms. Leslie Waters The Ferguson Group 1130 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 300 Washington DC 20036 Oka • • AGENDA ITEM 7E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2003 Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307 Program of Projects PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the Federal Transit Administration's Section 5307 Program of Projects for Riverside County for FY 03. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Annually, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) distributes federal operating and capital block grant funds to urbanized areas through its Section 5307 Program. There are four urbanized areas in Riverside County: Western Riverside County, Hemet, Palm Springs, and Indio/Coachella. In order for grants to be approved, the Commission must develop and approve a Program of Projects for each area. The actual apportionment for FY 03 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The Programs were developed at the highest anticipated amount to allow the operators to proceed with their grant applications and to avoid delays associated with program amendments and additional paperwork should the actual apportionments come in lower than estimated. Additionally, the release of the 2000 census will change the urbanized areas. At this time, we know that the Palm Springs and Indio/Coachella urbanized area will be combined. In addition, the Temecula/Murrieta area will become an urbanized area. The effect, if any, on the funding for these areas will not be known until later this fiscal year. The proposed Program of Projects contains projects from the approved Short Range Transit Plan for FY 03-05 and were developed in cooperation with the eligible public transit operators. The balances available will be carried over to the next fiscal year. The Program of Projects for the four urbanized areas in Riverside County is attached for review and approval. Attachment: Program of Projects, FTA Section 5307 FY 02-03 Item 7E 000094 " U R B A N I Z E D A R E A : A P P O R T I O N M E N T C A R R Y O V E R F U N D S : T R A N S F E R F U N D S : T O T A L F U N D S A V A I L A B L E : P R O G R A M O F P R O J E C T S F T A S E C T I O N 5 3 0 7 F Y 2 0 0 2 - 0 3 H E M E T $ 1 , 0 2 8 , 3 2 0 $ 1 , 0 0 6 , 8 4 0 $ 0 $ 2 , 0 3 5 , 1 6 0 R E C I P I E N T S : S U B A R E A A P P O R T I O N M E N T S R I V E R S I D E T R A N S I T A G E N C Y $ 1 , 8 2 8 , 3 2 0 P R O G R A M O F P R O J E C T S : 1 ) R T A - O P E R A T I N G A S S I S T A N C E D I A L - A - R I D E A N D F I X E D R O U T E " - R I V 2 1 3 0 3 2 ) R T A - C A P I T A L I Z E P R E V E N T A T I V E M A I N T E N A N C E " T O T A L F E D E R A L P R O J E C T D E S I G N A T E D A M O U N T S H A R E T Y P E R E C I P I E N T $ 2 5 , 8 5 2 , 6 9 8 $ 1 , 0 2 8 , 3 2 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 T O T A L P R O G R A M M E D : $ 2 6 , 8 5 2 , 6 9 8 $ 1 , 8 2 8 , 3 2 0 B A L A N C E A V A I L A B L E : $ 2 0 6 , 8 4 0 T L : 6 / 2 4 / 0 2 0 S T A T E C S T A T E PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2002-03 URBANIZED AREA: APPORTIONMENT: CARRYOVER FUNDS: TRANSFER FUNDS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: INDIO/COACHELLA $621,797 $0 $0 $621,797 RECIPIENTS: SUBAREA APPORTIONMENTS SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY $621,797 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) SUNLINE - PROPERTY ACQUISITION $102,000 $27,342 C STATE INSTALLMENT PAYMENT: VARNER RD RIV 010502 2) SUNLINE - CAPITALIZED VEHICLE $814,000 $218,944 C STATE MAINTENANCE -RIV 990904 3) SUNLINE - DEBT PAYMENT ON 34 $527,000 $141,531 C STATE 40 -FOOT ORION CNG BUSES - RIV 32412 4) SUNLINE - PURCHASE THREE $200,000 $53,788 C STATE 40 -FOOT CNG BUSES (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 62127 5) SUNLINE - PURCHASE 3 SUPPORT $180,000 $48,410 C STATE VEHICLES (REPLACEMENT)- RIV 32257 6) SUNLINE - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS $545,000 $123,713 C STATE - RIV 32254 7) SUNLINE - PURCHASE REPLACEMENT $30,000 $8,069 C STATE COMPUTER AND OFFICE EQUIPMENT - RIV 32255 TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $2,398,000 $621,797 BALANCE AVAILABLE: $0 TL: 6/24/02 000096 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2002-03 URBANIZED AREA: APPORTIONMENT: CARRYOVER FUNDS: TRANSFER FUNDS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: PALM SPRINGS $1,227,811 $0 $0 $1,227,811 RECIPIENTS: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY SUBAREA APPORTIONMENTS $1,227,811 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: 1) SUNLINE - PROPERTY ACQUISITION INSTALLMENT PAYMENT: VARNER RD RIV 010502 2) SUNLINE - CAPITALIZED VEHICLE • MAINTENANCE - RIV 990904 3) SUNLINE - DEBT PAYMENT ON 34 40 -FOOT ORION CNG BUSES - RIV 32412 4) SUNLINE - PURCHASE THREE 40 -FOOT CNG BUSES (REPLACEMENT) RIV 62127 5) SUNLINE - PURCHASE 3 SUPPORT VEHICLES (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 32257 6) SUNLINE - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS - RIV 32254 7) SUNLINE - PURCHASE REPLACEMENT COMPUTER AND OFFICE EQUIPMENT - RIV 32255 TOTAL PROGRAMMED: BALANCE AVAILABLE: TL: 6/24/02 • TOTAL AMOUNT FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT $102,000 $53,990 $814,000 $527,000 $200,000 $180,000 $545,000 $30,000 $432,331 $279,469 $106,212 $95,590 $244,287 $15,932 $2,398,000 $1,227,811 $0 C STATE STATE STATE STATE STATE STATE STATE 090097 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2002-03 URBANIZED AREA: BUS APPORTIONMENT: RAIL APPORTIONMENT: CARRYOVER FUNDS -BUS: CARRYOVER FUNDS -RAIL: TRANSFER FUNDS - BUS (CMAQ) TRANSFER FUNDS -RAIL: TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -BUS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -RAIL: RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO $6,178,364 $4,767,890 $3,189,643 $8,315,721 385,000 $0 $9,753,007 $13,083,611 RECIPIENTS: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY CITY OF CORONA CITY OF RIVERSIDE RCTC - COMMUTER RAIL SUBAREA APPORTIONMENT $4,385,000 $902,000 $581,000 $4,239,000 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: 1) CORONA - PURCHASE FOUR REPLACEMENT DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES - RIV 32145 2) CORONA - PURCHASE THREE EXPANSION VEHICLES FIXED ROUTE - RIV 010511 3) CORONA - PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE - RIV 020604 4) RIVERSIDE - PURCHASE 8 INTERMEDIATE SIZED SERVICE BUSES FOR DAR (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 32166 5) RIVERSIDE - PURCHASE TWO DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 020605 6) RTA - PURCHASE OFFICE EQUIPMENT - RIV 32221 7) RTA - PURCHASE OF MAINTENANCE SPARE COMPONENTS AND EQUIPMENT - RIV 32236 8) RTA - PURCHASE OF BUS STOP AMENITIES AND SUPPLIES - RIV 32237 9) RTA - PURCHASE 10 DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 32666 10) RTA - DEBT FINANCING FOR 57 TRANSIT COACHES PURCHASED IN 2000 - RIV 000605 11) RTA - IMPROVEMENTS AT RIVERSIDE AND HEMET FACILITIES - RIV 990722 12) RTA - PURCHASE OF 10 SUPPORT VEHICLES (EXPANSION) - RIV 990724 13) RTA - PURCHASE OF 10 30 -FOOT BUSES (EXPANSION) - RIV 020601 14) RTA - PURCHASE 5 SUPPORT VEHICLES (REPLACEMENT) - RIV 020602 15) RTA - CNG FUELING STATION AT RIV. FACILITY CMAQ - FLEX FUNDS - RIV 000101 16) RCTC - REHABILITATION AND RENOVATION OF TRACK IMPROVEMENTS (RCTC's PORTION - SCRRA PROJECT) - RIV 010514 17) RCTC'S ROLLING STOCK RESERVE - RIV 010214 TOTAL PROGRAMMED BALANCE AVAILABLE: BUS: RAIL: TOTAL AMOUNT $600,000 $451,000 $30,000 $560,000 $140,000 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $400,000 $2,140,000 $500,000 $220,000 $3,100,000 $100,000 $450,000 $995,000 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE $498,000 $374,000 $30,000 $465,000 $116,000 $80,000 $80,000 $160,000 $320,000 $1,712,000 $400,000 $176,000 $992,000 $80,000 $385,000 $995,000 $3,244,000 $3,244,000 $13,330,000 $10,107,000 $3,885,007 $8,844,611 TYPE RECIPIENT C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG 00009186,24,02 AGENDA ITEM 7F • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services Steven DeBaun, Legal Counsel THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Local Guidelines Update for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Approval of Resolution No. 03-005, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending and Adopting Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code §§ 21000 Et Seq.)" PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: • • 1) Approve the update to the Commission's local guidelines for implementing CEQA; and, 2) Approve Resolution No. 03-005, ",4 Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending and Adopting Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code §§ 21000 Et Seq.)". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the 2001 legislative session, several bills were signed by the Governor affecting the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in some way. Some of the 2001 court decisions affecting CEQA were not substantive changes to the Guidelines. However, there is one legislation that may warrant discussion, and this is Assembly Bill 1532 (PAVLEY, Chapter 867). AB 1532 requires public agencies to conduct scoping for projects of statewide, regional or area -wide significance, as follows: AB 1532 requires a lead agency to call at least one scoping meeting for a project "of statewide, regional, or area -wide significance" and requires the lead agency to provide a notice of the scoping meeting to: 1) any county or Item 7F 000099 city that borders on a county or city within which the project is located; 2) any responsible agency; 3) any public agency that has jurisdiction by law over the project; and, 4) any organization or individual who has filed a written request for the notice. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 03-005 2) 2001 CEQA Case Law 3) Proposed RCTC CEQA Guidelines • • • Item 7F 000100 RESOLUTION NO. 03-005 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING AND ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PUB. RESOURCES CODE §§ 21000 ET SEQ.) WHEREAS, the California Legislature has amended the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code § § 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code of Regs. tit. 14, 15000 et seq.) and the California courts have interpreted specific provisions of CEQA; • • WHEREAS, Section 21082 of CEQA requires all public agencies to adopt objectives, criteria and procedures for evaluation of public and private projects undertaking or approved by such public agencies, and the preparation, if required, of environmental impact reports and negative declarations in connection with that evaluation; and, WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("District") must revise its local guidelines for implementing CEQA to make them consistent with the current provisions and interpretations of CEQA. NOW, THEREFORE, the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1. The Riverside County Transportation Commission adopts "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002 Revision)", a copy of which is on file at the offices of the Commission and is available for inspection by the public. SECTION 2. All prior actions of the Riverside County Transportation Commission enacting earlier Guidelines are hereby repealed. 006101. ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2002. John Tavaglione, Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver Clerk of the Board 000102 2001 CEQA CASE LAW • • • Summarized below are a few of the 2001 cases involving the application of CEQA that may be of interest. One of these cases, Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency, Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 00CS00300, is noteworthy because it invalidated 8 portions of the State CEQA Guidelines (§§ 15064(h), 15064(i)(3), 15064(i)(4), t5130(a)(4), 15130(b)(I)(B)(2), 15152(f)(2), 15152(f)(3)(C), and 15378(b)(5).) Your Local Guidelines have been revised as appropriate to track these changes to the State CEQA Guidelines. The remainder of the cases summarized below have not resulted in direct changes to the Local Guidelines. However, they do provide some clarification on the application of CEQA and, as such, are worth noting. As indicated above, in Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency, Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 00CS00300, a trial court judge invalidated 8 provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines. Generally, administrative agencies such as the Resources Agency may issue regulations interpreting and clarifying provisions of a statutory scheme. However, administrative regulations cannot contradict the provisions of the governing statutes. To the extent there is any conflict between the administrative regulations and the statutes, the statutes control and the regulations are invalid. Petitioners in the Communities for a Better Environment case were environmental groups who challenged certain portions of the State CEQA Guidelines that the Resources Agency had adopted as part of its 1998 amendment of the Guidelines. Petitioners argued that these provisions were invalid because they conflicted with the statutes under which they had been promulgated. The judge agreed with the environmental groups in part and invalidated the following 8 provisions: (1) § 15064(h), relating to a project's compliance with an environmental standard; (2) 15130(b)(I)(B)(2), defining "probable future projects"; (3,4) §§ 15130(a)(4) and 15064(i), authorizing a finding of no significant cumulative impact when the project's cumulative impacts are de minimis; (5) § 15152(f)(:i), allowing a later project proceeding under a first -tier to find that the project's cumulative impacts were not significant when they were de minimis; (6) § 15064(i)(3), authorizing a finding that a project's incremental impact is not cumulatively considerable when the project complies with the requirements of a previously approved plan or mitigation program (such as a 000103 water quality control plan, air quality plan, or integrated waste management plan) adopted to avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem in the project's geographic area; (7) 15152(1') (3)(C), authorizing a lead agency analyzing a later project to find that its "significant environmental effects" had been adequately addressed in the first -tier El R as long as all feasible mitigation measures had been adopted in connection with the prior environmental approvals and the only purpose of including analysis of such effects in another EIR would be to put the agency in a position to adopt another Statement of Overriding Considerations; and, (8) §15378, excluding "organizational or administrative activities of governments which are political or which are not physical changes in the environment" from the definition of "projects" subject to CEQA review. This case is currently pending before the Third District Court of Appeal, which means that it is possible that the trial court's decision could be overruled some time this year. In the meantime, though, agencies should not rely upon any of the 8 provisions discussed above. State CEQA Guidelines section 15378 was also the focus of the Supreme Court's ruling in Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre (2001) 25 Cal. 4th 165. In that case, the City passed an ordinance creating a process for owners of property listed on the local historic register to have their properly de -listed. Several owners of listed properties subsequently petitioned the City to have their properties de -listed The City Council determined that its decision to de -list the properties would be subject to CEQA and that an EIR, costing property owners approximately $2,500 each, would need to be prepared. To avoid this expense, the City Council placed an initiative on the ballot by which voters could decide whether to de -list the properties. The City argued that the ballot initiative was exempt from CEQA under Guidelines § 15378(b)(3), which exempts the "submittal of proposals" to voters from the definition of a CEQA project. The Supreme Court held that a decision to place the question of de -listing on the ballot was discretionary and not ministerial, so that the activity was a "project" requiring CEQA compliance. The Court reasoned that Guidelines section 15378(b) was intended to exempt only voter -sponsored initiatives because the City Council's placement of a voter -sponsored initiative on the ballot is merely a ministerial act. When the City Council's decision is merely ministerial because it is merely responding to ,a petition drive initiated by voters, CEQA review is not required. In contrast, when the initiative was generated by the City, the City Council's decision to place its own measure on a ballot should be considered a "project" to which CEQA requirements apply. 000104 " " " I n S a v e O u r P e n i n s u l a C o m m i t t e e v . M o n t e r e y C o u n t y B o a r d o f S u p e r v i s o r s ( 2 0 0 1 ) 8 7 C a l . A p p . 4 t h 9 9 , s e v e r a l e n v i r o n m e n t a l g r o u p s c h a l l e n g e d t h e f i n d i n g s a n d a n E I R f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f a 1 1 7 - u n i t p r o p e r t y i n w a t e r - s h o r t C a r m e l V a l l e y . T h e C o u r t a g r e e d w i t h t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l g r o u p s a n d h e l d t h a t t h e E I R w a s i n a d e q u a t e i n i t s t r e a t m e n t o f s e v e r a l c r i t i c a l w a t e r s u p p l y i s s u e s . P r i m a r i l y , t h e c o u r t w a s c o n c e r n e d w i t h t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e b a s e l i n e f o r d e t e r m i n i n g t h e p r o j e c t ' s i m p a c t o n w a t e r r e s o u r c e s . T h e b a s e l i n e i s t h e s t a t e m e n t o f p r e - p r o j e c t e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s t h a t i s u s e d t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r t h e p r o j e c t ' s i m p a c t s a r e s i g n i f i c a n t . T h e E I R i n i t i a l l y e s t a b l i s h e d a w a t e r - u s e b a s e l i n e o f 4 5 a c r e - f e e t p e r y e a r , b a s e d o n t h e d e v e l o p e r ' s r e p r e s e n t a t i o n t h a t s o m e o f t h e l a n d w a s i r r i g a t e d w h e n t h e N o t i c e o f P r e p a r a t i o n w a s p r e p a r e d . H o w e v e r , t h e E I R d i d n o t c o n t a i n a n y a n a l y s i s r e g a r d i n g t h e c h o i c e o f b a s e l i n e s a n d u l t i m a t e l y t h e B o a r d d e t e r m i n e d t h e b a s e l i n e b y c h o o s i n g f r o m a m o n g v a r i o u s c a l c u l a t i o n s o f r a w n u m b e r s . T h e f i g u r e s i n t h e s e c a l c u l a t i o n s d i d n o t r e f l e c t w a t e r a c t u a l l y u s e d f o r i r r i g a t i n g t h e p r o p e r t y . T h e C o u r t r e a s o n e d t h a t t h i s c h o i c e o f b a s e l i n e v i o l a t e d t h e b a s i c p r i n c i p l e s o f C E Q A , w h i c h r e q u i r e t h a t a n E I R s t a r t w i t h a d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e e x i s t i n g e n v i r o n m e n t . B e c a u s e t h e B o a r d s e l e c t e d t h e b a s e l i n e w i t h o u t a n y e x p l a n a t i o n o f i t s a n a l y s i s , i t a b u s e d i t s d i s c r e t i o n . M o r e o v e r , t h e s e l e c t e d b a s e l i n e w a s n o t s u p p o r t e d b y s u b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e o f a c t u a l w a t e r u s e o n t h e p r o p e r t y , a n d t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n o f a n e w m e t h o d o l o g y f o r b a s e l i n e d e t e r m i n a t i o n a t t h e e n d o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e v i e w p r o c e s s w i t h o u t a n y a n a l y s i s o r p u b l i c r e v i e w w a s i m p r o p e r . T h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l b a s e l i n e i s n o r m a l l y d e t e r m i n e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s e x i s t i n g o n t h e d a t e o f t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e N o t i c e o f P r e p a r a t i o n f o r t h e E I R . T h e S a v e O u r P e n i n s u l a C o u r t r e c o g n i z e d t h a t t h e r e a r e i n s t a n c e s w h e n a d i f f e r e n t d a t e s h o u l d b e u s e d t o r e f l e c t m o r e a c c u r a t e l y t h e p r e - p r o j e c t e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s . A s l o n g a s l e a d a g e n c y e x p l a i n s t h e r e a s o n f o r t h e c h a n g e a n d i n d i c a t e s w h y a d i f f e r e n t d a t e i s a p p r o p r i a t e , i t m a y u s e t h i s a p p r o a c h . T h i s c a s e r e i t e r a t e s t h e w e l l - e s t a b l i s h e d p r i n c i p l e t h a t a n E I R m u s t c o n t a i n a n a l y s i s i n a d d i t i o n t o r a w d a t a . W h e n a n E I R T a c k s s u c h a n a l y s i s , a d e c i s i o n b a s e d o n l y o n t h e r a w d a t a m a y b e c o n s i d e r e d a n a b u s e o f d i s c r e t i o n . I n S h e r w i n W i l l i a m s C o m p a n y v . S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t ( 2 0 0 1 ) 8 6 C a l . A p p . 4 t h 1 2 5 8 , t h e C o u r t f o u n d t h a t t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f C E Q A w e r e s a t i s f i e d w h e n t h e C a l i f o r n i a A i r R e s o u r c e s B o a r d ( A R B ) a p p r o v e d m o r e s t r i n g e n t p a i n t r e g u l a t i o n s t h a t h a d b e e n a d o p t e d b y t h e S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t a s p a r t o f i t s c e r t i f i e d r e g u l a t o r y p r o g r a m . A l t h o u g h t h e A R B h a d n o t c o n d u c t e d s e p a r a t e e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n a l y s i s o f t h e n e w r e g u l a t i o n s , t h e Court held that the ARB's action of approving the paint regulations did not constitute a "project" because the definition of "project" does not extend to each of the several approvals sequentially issued by different governmental agencies where there are no changes to the EIR or new adverse information. In Eller Media Company v. City of Los Angeles (2001 ) 87 Cal. App. 4th 1217, the plaintiff sought to have its applications for permits to construct three outdoor billboard structures deemed approved because the City had failed to make a determination on the applications within the time limits prescribed in the Permit Streamlining Act. However, the provisions of the Permit Streamlining Act that result in a project being deemed approved when the public agency fails to act on the application prior to the deadline are not triggered until CEQA review is complete. The not performed in a timely manner was insufficient to deem the applications approved, and plaintiff's action was therefore dismissed. In Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Commissioners (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, the Court made it clear that public agencies are required, under CEQA, to make a good faith effort at disclosure by using the best available data to assess a project's environmental impacts. The plaintiffs challenged the Board of Port Commissioners' certification of an EIR for an airport development plan designed to accommodate anticipated growth in passenger and cargo activity at Oakland International Airport. The Court found the EIR inadequate on several grounds, including the Port's reliance on outdated and inaccurate data in assessing the increased emission of toxic air contaminants from airplane engines. The Port had received comments on the draft EIR suggesting that the figures it was using to represent the levels of toxic air contaminants were outdated and it should use more recent figures which the California Air Resources Board considered to be the best available data for jet exhaust. However, the Port continued to rely on an earlier -published document, which indicated substantially lower levels of toxic air contaminant emissions from jet exhaust. The Court held that the Port did not meet the standard of a "good faith effort of full disclosure" required by CEQA because the Port was aware of more accurate data but rejected it without sufficient explanation. In Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 342, the Court ruled that a public agency may delete an earlier -adopted mitigation measure as long as it states a legitimate reason for such action and supports that statement of reason with substantial evidence. In connection with a specific plan update, Napa County concluded that a number of the mitigation measures adopted as part of the original specific plan were not feasible and deleted them from the certified EIR for the updated specific plan. The Court upheld the County's action because it was supported by findings • • • 000106 and substantial evidence that the mitigation measures were infeasible due to lack of funding, the need to acquire property through eminent domain and the County's lack of control over the implementation of the mitigation measures. In Guardians of Elk Creek Old Growth v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, (2001) 89 Cal. App. 4th 1431, the Court ruled that the 90 day deadline for the petitioner in a CEQA proceeding to file a request for hearing is not tolled by a change of venue when the transferee court gives proper notice of the transfer. In this case, an environmental group filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the approval of a timber harvest plan under CEQA. Upon a motion by real parties in interest, the matter was transferred from Sacramento to Mendocino and the Mendocino Court gave the parties notice that the case had been filed and was active. On the 92nd day after the petition was filed, the real parties in interest filed a motion to dismiss the petition based on petitioner's failure to request a hearing within 90 days as required by Public Resources Code section21167.4, subd. (a). Eight days later, and 100 days after the petition was filed, the petitioner filed the required request. The Court upheld the dismissal of the case, finding that a petitioner who has notice of the change of venue must file the request for hearing in the new court within the 90 day deadline. In Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles (2001) 90 Cal. App.4th 1162, the court upheld the City's finding that its systematic housing inspection program was exempt from CEQA review based upon its local CEQA guidelines. The City's local CEQA guidelines exempted projects consisting of "the restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures to meet current public health, safety and environmental standards." Invoking this exemption, the City implemented a program to bring substandard housing up to current codes. Plaintiff, an industry group representing landlords, challenged the use of the exemption to support the program. The court rejected this challenge, finding that plaintiff had not produced substantial evidence that the City's code enforcement program has the potential for a substantial adverse environmental impact. To the contrary, the record contained substantial evidence to support the City's finding that a categorical exemption was properly applied to its code enforcement program. This evidence consisted of a study demonstrating that the code enforcement program would have no significant effect on housing availability and displacement of residents. This case shows how beneficial it can be to have local CEQA guidelines that are carefully tailored to an agency's particular policies and goals and how important it is for the agency to develop a thorough record at the administrative level to support its decisions. In Jobe v. City of Orange (2001) 88 Cal. App. 4th 412, the Court held that real parties in interest may not recover attorneys' fees under the "Private Attorney General" doctrine unless they can demonstrate that their defense of the litigation conferred a significant benefit on the public as a whole and was not motivated merely by their personal interests in the outcome. In Jobe, a neighbor of an Orange County private high school filed an unsuccessful CEQA challenge against the city's &00I4'7 approval of permit and mitigated negative declaration for expansion of the school. After the neighbor's claims were rejected, the school, a non-profit organization, argued that it was entitled to recover its attorneys' fees from the neighbor under the "Private Attorney General" doctrine because it was advancing the public interest in education. The Court rejected this request because the school was merely trying to advance its own pecuniary interest by defending the physical expansion of the parochial school it owns and operates. In Kaczorowski v. Board of Supervisors for the County of Mendocino (2001) 88 Cal. App. 4th 564, the Court reconfirmed that CEQA lawsuits are subject to dismissal for failure to name an indispensable party. In this case, a resident challenged a private project that had been approved by the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors and had received a permit from the California Coastal Commission. The petition named the Board and the landowners as real parties in interest, but failed to name the Commission. Because the Commission issued a permit for the project after conducting a de novo proceeding, it was an indispensable party. Accordingly, it had to be named as a party to the lawsuit, and the failure to bring a timely suit naming the Commission subjected the case to dismissal. On the other hand, in Deltakeeper v. Oakdale Irrigation District (2001) 94 Cal. App. 4th 1092, the Court reconfirmed that parties are not indispensable when their interests are identical to, and adequately represented by, existing defendants or real parties. The project considered in Deltakeeper was a water transfer agreement through which Oakdale Irrigation District and South San Joaquin Irrigation District agreed to sell water to Stockton East Water District and various other parties. When environmental groups filed a petition challenging the adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project, they named only Oakdale, San Joaquin, and Stockton East; the other parties to the agreement were not named. The named defendants then filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to join indispensable parties. The Court rejected the argument that the other parties to the contract were indispensable so that the case could not proceed in their absence. As the named parties included representatives from both the sellers and the buyers, the Court found that the named parties' economic interests in the continued success of the water transfer agreement were such that they could be expected to argue vigorously in favor of the adequacy of the EIR for both themselves and the unnamed parties. Moreover, the named and unnamed parties had entered into an agreement that allowed the unnamed parties to participate in all the litigation decisions made by the named parties, and counsel conceded at oral argument that, under these circumstances, the presence of the named parties would not have made any difference in the defense of the EIR. Consequently, the unnamed parties were not indispensable and the case was not subject to dismissal for failure to include them. 000108 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) General Provisions, Purpose and Policy LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLE1VIENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (2002 REVISION) 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS, PURPOSE AND POLICY 1.01 GENERAL PROVISIONS. These Local Guidelines ("Guidelines") are to assist the Commission in implementing the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). These Guidelines are consistent with the Guidelines for the Implementation of CEQA ("State Guidelines") which must be followed by state and local agencies in California. These Guidelines have been adopted pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21082. 1.02 PURPOSE The purpose of these Local Guidelines is to help the Commission accomplish the following basic objectives of CEQA: (a) To enhance and provide long-term protection for the environment, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian. (b) To provide information to governmental decision -makers and the public regarding the potential significant environmental effects of the proposed project. (c) To provide an analysis of the environmental effects of future actions associated with the project to adequately apprise all interested parties of the true scope of the project for intelligent weighing of the environmental consequences of the project. (d) To identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced. (e) To prevent significant avoidable environmental damage through utilization of feasible project alternatives or mitigation measures. (f) To disclose and demonstrate to the public the reasons why a governmental agency approved the project in the manner chosen. Public participation is an essential part of the CEQA process. Each public agency should encourage wide public involvement, formal and informal, in order to receive and evaluate public reactions to environmental issues related to a public agency's activities. Such involvement should include, whenever possible, making environmental information available in electronic format on the Internet, on a web site maintained or utilized by the public agency. • RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 1-1 .00 `Q9 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) General Provisions, Purpose and Policy 1.03 APPLICABILITY. These Guidelines apply to any activity of the Commission which constitutes a "project" as defined in Guidelines Section 9.35. An Environmental Impact Report ("EIR.") is required for each such project whichmay have a significant effect on the environment. When the Commission finds that a project will have no significant environmental effect, a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration rather than an EIR shall be prepared. An EIR serves several functions for the benefit of the Commission and the public. An EIR (1) identifies and analyzes the significant environmental effects of a proposed project, (2) identifies alternatives to the project, and (3) discloses possible ways to reduce or avoid potential environmental damage. These matters are to be evaluated by the Commission before the project is approved or disapproved. The EIR is an informational document. It should not be used to rationalize approval of a project. CEQA requires that decisions be informed and balanced. It must not be subverted into an instrument for the oppression and delay of social economic, or recreational development or advancement. Indications ofadverse environmental impacts from the project which are identified in the EIR do not necessarily require disapproval of a project. Rather, when an EIR shows that a project would cause substantial adverse changes in the environment, the Commission must respond to the information by one or more of the following methods: (a) Changing the proposed project. (b) Imposing conditions on the approval of the project. (c) Adopting plans or ordinances to control a broader class of activities to avoid the problems. (d) Choosing an alternative way of meeting the same need. (e) Disapproving the project. (fl Finding that the unavoidable, significant environmental damage is acceptable pursuant to a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Although CEQA requires that major consideration be given to preventing environmental damage, the Commission also has an obligation to balance other public objectives for each project including economic and social factors. 1.04 REDUCING DELAY AND PAPERWORK The State Guidelines encourage local governmental agencies to reduce delay and paperwork by, among other things: (a) Integrating the CEQA process into early planning review; to this end, the project approval process and these procedures, to the maximum extent feasible, are to run concurrently, not consecutively; RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 1-2 00011( Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) General Provisions, Purpose and Policy (b) (c) (d) (e) (0 (g) (h) (1) (J) (k) (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) Identifying projects which fit within categorical or other exemptions and are therefore exempt from CEQA processing; Using initial studies to identify significant environmental issues and to narrow the scope of EIRs; Using a Negative Declaration when a project not otherwise exempt will not have a significant effect on the environment; Consulting with state and local responsible agencies before and during the preparation of an EIR so that the document will meet the needs of all the agencies which will use it; Allowing applicants to revise projects to eliminate possible significant effects on the environment, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a Negative Declaration rather than an EIR; Integrating CEQA requirements with other environmental review and consultation requirements; Emphasizing consultation before an EIR is prepared, rather than submitting adverse comments on a completed document; Combining environmental documents with other documents, such as general plans; Eliminating repetitive discussions of the same issues by using EIRs on programs, policies or plans and tiering from statements of broad scope to those of narrower scope; Reducing the length of EIRs by means such as setting appropriate page limits; Preparing analytic, rather than encyclopedic EIRs; Mentioning insignificant issues only briefly; Writing EIRs in plain language; Following a clear format for EIRs; Emphasizing the portions of the EIR that are useful to decision -makers and the public and reducing emphasis on background material; Incorporating information by reference; and Making comments on EIRs as specific as possible. 1.05 COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. These Guidelines are intended to implement the provisions of CEQA and the State Guidelines, and the provisions of CEQA and the State Guidelines shall be fully complied with even though they may not be set forth or referred to herein. 1.06 TERMINOLOGY. The terms "must" or "shall" identify mandatory requirements. The term "may" is permissive, with the particular decision being left to the discretion of the Commission. The term "should" identifies the guidance of the Office of Planning and Research, which the Commission can follow in the absence of countervailing considerations. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 1-3 000111. Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) General Provisions, Purpose and Policy 1.07 PARTIAL INVALIDITY. In the event any part or provision of these Guidelines shall be determined to be invalid, the remaining portions which can be separated from the invalid unenforceable provisions shall continue in full force and effect. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 1-4 000112 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Lead and Responsible Agencies 2. LEAD AND RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES 2.01 LEAD AGENCY PRINCIPLE. The Commission will be the Lead Agency if it will have principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. Where a project is to be carried out or approved by more than one public agency, only one agency shall be responsible for the preparation of environmental documents. This agency shall be called the Lead Agency. 2.02 SELECTION OF LEAD AGENCY. Where two or more public agencies will be involved with a project, the Lead Agency shall be designated according to the following criteria: (a) If the project will be carried out by a public agency, that agency shall be the Lead Agency even if the project will be located within the jurisdiction of another public agency. (b) If the project will be carried out by a nongovernmental person or entity, the Lead Agency shall be the public agency with the greatest responsibility for supervising and approving the project as a whole. The Lead Agency will normally be the agency with general governmental powers, rather than an agency with a single or limited purpose. (For example, a district which will provide a public service or utility to the project serves a limited purpose.) If two or more agencies meet this criteria equally, the agency which acts first on the project will be the Lead Agency. (c) If two or more public agencies have a substantial claim to be the Lead Agency under either (a) or (b), they may designate one agency as the Lead Agency by agreement. An agreement may also provide for cooperative efforts by contract, joint exercise of powers, or similar devices. If an agreement cannot be reached, the dispute maybe submitted to the Office of Planning and Research by any public agency, or the applicant if a private project is involved. 2.03 DUTIES OF A LEAD AGENCY. As a Lead Agency, the Commission shall decide whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR will be required for a project and shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and consider the document before making its decision on whether and how to approve the project. The documents may be prepared by Staffor by private consultants pursuant to a contract with the Commission. However, the Commission shall independently review and analyze all draft and final reports or declarations prepared for a project, and shall find that the report or declaration reflects the independent judgment of the Commission prior to approval of the document. If a Draft EIR, Final EIR or Focused EIR is prepared under a contract to the Commission, the contract must be executed within forty-five (45) days from the date on which the Commission sends a Notice of Preparation. (See Guidelines Section 7.02.) RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 2-1 000113 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Lead and Responsible Agencies During the process of preparing an EIR, the Commission shall have the following duties: (a) Immediately after deciding that an EIR is required for a project, the Commission shall send to each Responsible Agency a Notice of Pieparation (Form "G") stating that an EIR will be prepared. (See Guidelines Section 7.03.) (b) The Commission shall prepare or cause to be prepared the Draft EIR for the project. (See Guidelines Section 7.04.) (c) Once the Draft EIR is completed, the Commission shall file a Notice of Completion (Form "H") with the Office of Planning and Research. (See Guidelines Section 7.17.) (d) The Commission shall consult with state, federal and local agencies which exercise authority over resources which may be affected by the project for their comments on the completed Draft EIR. (See Guidelines Section 7.20.) (e) The Commission shall provide public notice of the availability of a Draft EIR (Form "K") at the same time that it sends a Notice of Completion to the Office of Planning and Research. (See Guidelines Section 7.17.) (fl The Commission shall evaluate comments on environmental issues received from persons who reviewed the Draft EIR and shall prepare or cause to be prepared a written response. A written response must be provided at least ten (10) days prior to certifying an EIR. (See Guidelines Section 7.23.) (g) The Commission shall prepare or cause to be prepared a Final EIR before approving the project. (See Guidelines Section 7.24.) (h) The Commission shall certify that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and has been reviewed by the Board of Directors.. (See Guidelines Section 7.26.) (I) The Commission shall include in the Final EIR, the reply of any Responsible Agency to the Notice of Preparation or Draft EIR. (See Guidelines Sections 2.07, 7.23 and 7.24.) 2.04 CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. An applicant for a development project must submit a signed statement to the Commission stating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included in any list compiled by the Secretary for Environmental Protection of the California Environmental Protection Agency ("California EPA") listing hazardous waste sites and other specified sites located in the city or county. The applicant's statement must contain the following information: (a) The applicant's name, address, and phone number. (b) Address of site, and local agency (city/county). (c) Assessor's book, page, and parcel number. (d) The list which includes the site, identification number, and date of list. Before accepting as complete an application for any development project as defined in Guidelines Section 9.11, the Commission shall consult lists compiled by the Secretary for Environmental Protection RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 2-2 0001.14 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Lead and Responsible Agencies • • • of the California EPA pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 listing hazardous waste sites and other specified sites located in the city or county. The Commission shall notify an applicant for a development project if the project site is located on such a list and not already identified. In the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration (see Guidelines Section 6.04) or the Notice of Preparation of Draft EIR (see Guidelines Section 7.03), the Commission shall specify the California EPA list, if any, which includes the project site, and shall provide the information contained in the applicant's statement. This provision applies only to projects for which applications have not been deemed complete on or before January 1, 1992. 2.05 RESPONSIBLE AGENCY PRINCIPLE Where a project is to be carried out or approved by more than one public agency, all public agencies other than the Lead Agency which have discretionary approval power over the project shall be called Responsible Agencies. 2.06 DUTIES OF A RESPONSIBLE AGENCY. As a Responsible Agency, the Commission shall consider the environmental documents prepared or caused to be prepared by the Lead Agency and reach its own conclusions on whether and how to approve the project involved. The Commission shall also both respond to consultation by the Lead Agency and attend meetings as requested by the Lead Agency to assist the Lead Agency in preparing adequate environmental documents. The Commission should also review and comment on Draft EIRs and Negative Declarations. Comments shall be limited to those project activities which are within the Commission's area of expertise or are required to be carried out or approved by the Commission or are subject to the Commission's powers. As a Responsible Agency, the Commission may identify significant environmental effects of a project for which mitigation is necessary. As a Responsible Agency, the Commission may submit to the Lead Agency proposed mitigation measures which would address those significant environmental effects. Ifmitigation measures are required, the Commission shall submit to the Lead Agency complete and detailed performance objectives for such mitigation measures which would address the significant environmental effects identified, or refer the Lead Agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to the Lead Agency by the Commission, shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are within the Commission's authority. For private projects, the Commission, as a Responsible Agency, may require the project proponent to provide such information as may be required and to reimburse the Commission for all costs incurred by it in reporting to the Lead Agency. 2.07 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF PREPARATION BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 2-3 000115 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Lead and Responsible Agencies Within thirty (30) days of receipt of a Notice of Preparation of an EIR, the Commission, as a Responsible Agency, shall specify to the Lead Agency the scope and content of the environmental information related to the Commission's area of statutory responsibility in connection with the proposed project. At a minimum, the response shall identify the significant environmental issues and possible alternatives and mitigation which the Commission, as a Responsible Agency, will need to have explored in the Draft EIR Such information shall be specified in writing, shall be as specific as possible, and shall be communicated to the Lead Agency, by certified mail or any other method of transmittal which provides it with a record that the notice was received, not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the notice of the Lead Agency's determination. The Lead Agency shall incorporate this information into the EIR. 2.08 USE OF FINAL EIR OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES. The Commission, as a Responsible Agency, shall consider the Lead Agency's Final EIR or Negative Declaration before acting upon or approving a proposed project. The Commission shall consider the adequacy of the prior environmental documents for its purposes and in certain instances may require that a Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR be prepared. Mitigation measures and alternatives deemed feasible and relevant to the Commission's role in carrying out the project shall be adopted. Findings which are relevant to the Commission's responsibility shall be made. A Notice of Determination shall be filed by the Responsible Agency, but need not state that the Lead Agency's EIR or Negative Declaration complies with CEQA. 2.09 SHIFT IN LEAD AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES . The Commission, as a Responsible Agency, shall assume the role of the Lead Agency if (a) The Lead Agency did not prepare any environmental documents for the project, and the statute of limitations has expired for a challenge to the action of the appropriate Lead Agency. (b) The Lead Agency prepared environmental documents for the project, and all of the following conditions occur: (1) A Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is required; (2) The Lead Agency has granted a final approval for the project; and (3) The statute of limitations has expired for a challenge to the action of the appropriate Lead Agency. (c) The Lead Agency prepared inadequate environmental documents without providing public notice ofa Negative Declaration or sending Notice of P - paration of an EIR to Responsible Agencies and the statute of limitations has expired for a challenge to the action of the appropriate Lead Agency. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 2-4 000116 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA 3. ACTIVITIES EXEMPT FROM CEQA 3.01 ACTIONS SUBJECT TO CEQA. CEQA applies to discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies. If the proposed activity does not come within the definition of "project" contained in Guidelines Section 9.35, it is exempt from CEQA review. "Project" does not include: (a) Proposals for legislation to be enacted by the State Legislature. (b) Continuing administrative or maintenance activities, such as purchases for supplies, personnel - related actions, general policy and procedure making (except as provided in Guidelines Section 9.35), feasibility or planning studies. (c) The submittal of proposals to a vote of the people. (d) The creation ofgovernment funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may have a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. (e) Where the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. 3.02 MINISTERIAL PROJECTS. A ministerial project is exempt from CEQA review. This is a project undertaken or approved by the Commissionupon a given set of facts, in a prescribed manner, and in obedience to statute, ordinance, regulation or other legal mandate. A ministerial project is one in which the Commission officer or employee has no discretionary power to exercise personal judgment or opinion as to the method in which the project will be carried out. CEQA review would be irrelevant for a ministerial project, because the Commission must act in a preordained way regardless of environmental impacts. The decision whether a proposed project is ministerial in nature may involve or require, to some extent, interpretation of the language of the legal mandate, and should be made on a case -by -case basis. Ministerial projects include, but are not limited to: (a) Issuance of business licenses; (b) Approval of final subdivision maps and final parcel maps; (c) Approval of individual utility service connections and disconnections; (d) Issuance of licenses; (e) Issuance of a permit to do street work; (f) Issuance of building permits where the Commission does not retain significant discretionary power to modify or shape the project. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 3-1 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 00,011,7, Local Guidelines for Implementing the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA Where a project involves an approval that contains elements of both a ministerial and discretionary nature, the project will be deemed to be discretionary and subject to the requirements of CEQA. 3.03 EXEMPTIONS IN GENERAL. CEQA and the State Guidelines exempt certain activities and provide that local agencies shall further identify and describe certain exemptions. The requirements of CEQA and the obligation to prepare an EIR, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration do not apply to the exempt activities which are set forth in CEQA, the State Guidelines and this Chapter. 3.04 PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT. If, in the judgment of Staff, a proposed activity is exempt, Staff should so find on the form entitled "PreliminaryExemption Assessment" (Form "A"). The Preliminary Exemption Assessment shall be retained at the Commission's offices as a public record. 3.05 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION. After Commission approval of an exempt project, a "Notice ofExemption" (Form "B") maybe filed by Staff with the Clerk. The Preliminary Exemption Assessment shall be attached to the Notice of Exemption for filing. If filed, the Clerk must post the Notice within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt, and the Notice must remain posted for thirty (30) days. Although no California Department of Fish and Game ("DFG") filing fee is applicable to exempt projects, the Preliminary Exemption Assessment shall be attached to the Notice of Exemption for filing. The Clerk customarily charges a documentary handling fee to pay for record keeping on behalf of the DFG. Refer to the Index in the Staff Summary to determine if such a fee will be required for the project. The filing of a Notice of Exemption is recommended because it starts a thirty-five (35) day statute oflimitations on legal challenges to the Commission's determination that the project is exempt from CEQA. The Commission is encouraged to make postings of all filed notices available in electronic format on the Internet. These electronic postings are in addition to the procedures required by the State Guidelines and the Public Resources Code. If a Notice of Exemption is not filed, a one hundred eighty (180) day statute of limitations will apply. When a request is made for a copy of the Notice prior to the date on which the Commission determines the project is exempt, the Notice must be mailed, fast class postage prepaid, within five (5) days of the Commission's determination. If such a request is made following the Commission's determination, then the copy should be mailed in the same manner as soon as possible. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-2 • • 1 000.15 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA 3.06 DISAPPROVED PROJECTS. Projects which the Commission rejects or disapproves are exempt. An applicant shall not be relieved of paying the costs for an EIR or Negative Declaration prepared for a project prior to the Commission's disapproval of the project. 3.07 No POSSIBILITY OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT. Where it can be seen with absolute certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is exempt. 3.08 EMERGENCY PROJECTS . The following types of emergency projects are exempt: (The term "emergency" is defined in Guidelines Section 9.14.) (a) Work in a disaster -stricken area in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor pursuant to Section 8550 of the Government Code. This includes projects that will remove, destroy, or significantly alter an historical resource when that resource represents an imminent threat to the public of bodily harm or of damage to adjacent property or when the project has received a determination by the State Office of Historic Preservation pursuant to Section 5028(b) of the Public Resources Code. (b) Emergency repairs to publicly or privately owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety or welfare. (c) Projects necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency. This does not include long-term projects undertaken for the purpose of preventing or mitigating a situation that has a low probability of occurrence in the short-term. (d) Projects undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to maintain, repair, or restore an existing highway damaged by fire, flood, storm, earthquake, land subsidence, gradual earth movement, or landslide, provided that the project is within the existing right of way of that highway and is initiated within one year of the damage occurring. This exemption does not apply to highways designated as official state scenic highways, nor any project undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to expand or widen a highway damaged by fire, flood, storm, earthquake, land subsidence, gradual earth movement, or landslide. (e) Seismic work on highways and bridges pursuant to Section 180.2 of the Streets and Highways Code, Section 180, et seq. 3.09 FEASIBILITY AND PLANNING STUDIES. A project which involves only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the Commission has not yet approved, adopted or funded is exempt. • RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-3 000119 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA RCTC/RVPUB/556438 3-4 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 000120 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA 3.10 RATES, TOLLS, FARES AND CHARGES. The establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring or approval of rates, tolls, fares or other charges by the Commission which the Commission fmds are for one or more of the purposes listed below are exempt. (a) Meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits; (b) Purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment or materials; (c) Meeting financial reserve needs and requirements; (d) Obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. When the Commission determines that one of the aforementioned activities pertaining to rates, tolls, fares or charges is exempt from the requirements of CEQA, it shall incorporate written findings setting forth the specific basis for the claim of exemption in the record of any proceeding in which such an exemption is claimed. 3.11 SUBSURFACE PIPELINES WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGH'1-0E-WAY. The installation of a new pipeline or the maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, relocation, replacement, removal or demolition of an existing subsurface pipeline is exempt where the project is less than one mile in length and located within a public street, highway or any other public right-of-way. 3.12 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS UP TO 100 UNITS. A residential housing development project in an urbanized area with no more than one hundred (100) units affordable to lower income households (as defined by state law) is exempt if the developer: (a) provides adequate legal commitments that the project will continue to provide low and moderate income housing, and (b) meets all other requirements set forth in Section 21080.14 of the Public Resources Code. 3.13 MINOR ALTERATIONS TO FLUORIDATE WAtER UTILITIES. Minor alterations to water utilities made for the purpose of complying with the fluoridation requirements of Health and Safety Code Sections 4026.7 and 4026.8 or regulations adopted thereunder are exempt. 3.14 BALLOTMEASURES. The definition of project in the State Guidelines specifically excludes the submittal of proposals to a vote of the people of the state or of a particular community. This exception applies only to measures proposed in response to a petition drive initiated by voters. When the measure is sponsored by the School District the activity of placing that measure on the ballot is discretionary and is therefore subject to CEQA RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-5 000121 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA 3.15 OTHER SPECIFIC EXEMPTIONS. CEQA and the State Guidelines exempt many other specific activities, including early activities related to thermal power plants, ongoing projects, transportation improvement programs, family day care homes, congestion management programs, railroad grade separation projects, restriping of streets or highways to relieve traffic congestion, and hazardous or volatile liquid pipelines. Specific statutory exemptions are listed in the Public Resources Code, including Sections 21080 through 21080.33, and in State Guidelines, including Sections 15260 through 15285. 3.16 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS. The State Guidelines establish certain classes of categorical exemptions. These apply to classes ofprojects which have been legislatively determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which, therefore, are exempt. Compliance with the requirements of CEQA or the preparation of environmental documents for any project which comes within one of these classes of categorical exemptions is not required. The classes of projects are briefly summarized below. (Reference to the State Guidelines for the full description of each exemption is recommended.) The exemptions of Classes 3, 4, 5, 6 and 11 below are qualified in that such projects must be considered in light of the location of the project. A project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may, in a particularly sensitive environment, be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern which is designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state or local agencies. It is important to note that all exemptions for all classes are qualified to the extent that they are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place over time is significant or when there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. With the foregoing limitations in mind, the following classes of activity are exempt: Class 1: Existing Facilities. The operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, equipment or other property of every kind, which activity involves negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the Commission's determination. The types of "existing facilities" itemized in Class 1 are not intended to be all- inclusive of the types of projects which might fall within Class 1. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of an existing use. (State Guidelines Section 15301.) Class 2: Replacement or Reconstruction. Replacement or reconstruction of existing facilities, structures, or other property where the new facility or structure will be located on the same site as the RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-6 000122 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA replaced or reconstructed facility or structure and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the replaced or reconstructed facility or structure. (State Guidelines Section 15302.) Class 3: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Construction of limited numbers of small, new facilities or structures and installation of small, new equipment or facilities in small structures, and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. This exemption includes structures built for both residential and commercial uses. (The maximum number of structures allowable under this exemption is set forth in State Guidelines Section 15303.) Class 4: Minor Alterations to Land. Minor alterations in the condition of land, water, and/or vegetation which do not involve removal of healthy, mature or scenic trees. (State Guidelines Section 15304.) Class 5: Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations. Minor alterations in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than twenty percent (20%) which do not result in any changes in land use or density. (State Guidelines Section 15305.) Class 6: Information Collection. Basic data collection, research, experimental management, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. (State Guidelines Section 15306.) Class 7: Actions by Regulatory Agencies for Protection of Natural Resources. Actions taken by regulatory agencies as authorized by state law or local ordinance to assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of a natural resource where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. (State Guidelines Section 15307.) Class 8: Actions By Regulatory Agencies for Protection of the Environment. Actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. (State Guidelines Section 15308.) Class 9: Inspection. Inspection activities, including, but not limited to, inquiries into the performance of an operation and examinations of the quality, health or safety of a project. (State Guidelines Section 15309.) Class 10: Loans. Loans made by the Department of Veteran Affairs under the Veterans Farm and Home Purchase Act of 1943, mortgages for the purchase of existing structures where the loan will not be used for new construction and the purchase of such mortgages by financial institutions. (State Guidelines Section 15310.) RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-7 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA Class 11: Accessory Structures. Construction or placement of minor structures accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including, but not limited to, on - premise signs, small parking lots, and placement of seasonal or temporary use items such as lifeguard towers, mobile food units, portable restrooms or similar items in generally the same locations from time to time in publicly owned parks, stadiums or other facilities designed for public use. (State Guidelines Section 15311.) Class 12: Surplus Government Property Sales. Sales of surplus government property, except for certain parcels of land located in an area of statewide, regional or areawide concern. (State Guidelines Section 15312.) Class 13: Acquisition of Lands for Wildlife Conservation Purposes. Acquisition of lands for fish and wildlife conservation purposes, including habitat preservation, and for preserving access to public lands and waters where the purpose of the acquisition is to preserve the land in its natural condition. (State Guidelines Section 15313.) Class 14: Minor Additions to Schools. Minor additions to existing schools within existing school grounds where the addition does not increase original student capacity by more than twenty-five percent (25%) or ten (10) classrooms, whichever is less. The addition of portable classrooms is included in this exemption. (State Guidelines Section 15314.) Class 15: Minor Land Divisions. Divisions of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential, commercial or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous two (2) years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than twenty percent (20%). (State Guidelines Section 15315.) Class 16: Transfer of Ownership of Land in Order to Create Parks. Acquisition, sale, or other transfer of land in order to establish a park where the land is in a natural condition or contains historical or archaeological resources. CEQA will apply when a management plan is proposed that will change the area from its natural condition or cause substantial adverse change in the significance of the historic or archaeological resource. (State Guidelines Section 15316.) Class 17: Open Space Contracts or Easements. Establishment of agricultural preserves, making and renewing of open space contracts under the Williamson Act or acceptance of easements or fee interests in order to maintain the open space character of the area. (The cancellation of such preserves, contracts, interests or easements is not included in this exemption.) (State Guidelines Section 15317.) Class 18: Designation of Wilderness Areas. Designation of wildemess areas under the California Wilderness System. (State Guidelines Section 15318.) RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-8 000124 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA Class 19: Annexations of Existing Facilities and Lots for Exempt Facilities. (a) Annexations to a city or special district of areas containing existing public or private structures developed to the density allowed by the current zoning or prezoning of either the gaining or losing governmental agency, whichever is more restrictive; provided, however, that the extension ofutility services to the existing facilities would have a capacity to serve only the existing facilities. (b) Annexations of individual small parcels of the minimum size for facilities exempted by Class 3. (State Guidelines Section 15319.) Class 20: Changes in Organization of Local Agencies. Changes in the organization of local governmental agencies where the changes do not change the geographical area in which previously existing powers are exercised. (State Guidelines Section 15320.) Class 21: Enforcement Actions by Regulatory Agencies. Actions by the Commission to enforce or revoke a lease, permit, license, certificate or other entitlement for use issued, adopted or prescribed by the Commission or a law, general rule, standard or objective, administered or adopted by the Commission. (Construction activities undertaken by the Commission taking the enforcement or revocation action are not included in this exemption.) (State Guidelines Section 15321.) Class 22: Educational or Training Programs Involving No Physical Changes. The adoption, alteration or termination of educational or training programs which involve no physical alteration in the area affected or which involve physical changes only in the interior of existing school or training structures. (State Guidelines Section 15322.) Class 23: Normal Operations of Facilities for Public Gatherings. Continued or repeated normal operations of existing facilities for public gatherings for which the facilities were designed, where there is past history, of at least three years, of the facility being used for the same or similar purposes. Facilities included within this exemption include, but are not limited to race tracks, stadiums, convention centers, auditoriums, amphitheaters, planetariums, swimming pools and amusement parks. (State Guidelines Section 15323.) Class 24: Regulation of Working Conditions. Actions taken by the Commission to regulate employee wages, hours of work or working conditions where there will be no demonstrable physical changes outside the place of work. (State Guidelines Section 15324.) Class 25: Transfers of Ownership of Interest in Land to Preserve Existing Natural Conditions and Historical Resources. Transfers of ownership of interest in land in order to preserve open space, habitat, or historical resources. Examples include, but are not limited to, acquisition, sale, or other transfer of areas to preserve existing natural conditions, including plant or animal habitats, to allow continued agricultural use of the areas, to allow restoration of natural conditions, or to prevent encroachment of development into floodplains. (State Guidelines Section 15325.) RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-9 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Activities Exempt from CEQA Class 26: Acquisition of Housing for Housing Assistance Programs. Actions by a redevelopment agency, housing authority or other public agency to implement an adopted Housing Assistance Plan by acquiring an interest in housing units. (State Guidelines Section 15326.) Class 27: Leasing New Facilities. Leasing of a newly constructed or previously unoccupied privately owned facility by a local or state agency where the Commission determines, based on specific criteria, that the building is exempt. (State Guidelines Section 15327.) Class 28: Small Hydroelectric Projects as Existing Facilities. Installation of certain small hydroelectric generating facilities in connection with existing dams, canals and pipelines. (State Guidelines Section 15328.) Class 29: Cogeneration Projects at Existing Facilities. Installation of cogeneration equipment with a capacity of 50 megawatts or less at existing facilities meeting certain conditions. (State Guidelines Section 15329.) Class 30: Minor Actions to Prevent. Minimize. Stabili7e..Mitigate or Eliminate the Release or Threat of Release of Hazardous Waste or Hazardous Substances. Any minor cleanup actions costing $1 million or less to prevent, minimize, stabilize, mitigate, or eliminate the release or threat of release of a hazardous waste or substance. (State Guidelines Section 15330.) Class 31: Historical Resource Restoration / Rehabilitation. Maintenance, repairs, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation, or reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer. (State Guidelines Section 15331.) Class 32: In -Fill Development Projects. Projects characterized as in -fill development which meet the following conditions: (a) The project is consistent with applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. (State Guidelines Section 15332.) RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 3-10 000126 Local Guidelines for Implementing the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (2002) Time Limitations • 4. TIME LIMITATIONS 4.01 REVIEW OF PRIVATE PROJECT APPLICATIONS. Staff shall determine whether the application for a private project is complete within thirty (30) days of receipt of the application. No application may be deemed incomplete for lack of a waiver of the time limitations in Guidelines Sections 4.03 and 4.04. Accepting an application as complete does not limit the authority of the Commission, acting as the Lead Agency, to require the applicant to submit additional information needed for environmental evaluation of the project. Requiring such additional information after the application is complete does not change the status of the application. 4.02 DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. Except as provided in Guidelines Sections 4.05 and 4.06, Staffs initial determination as to whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR should be prepared shall be made within thirty (30) days from the date on which an application for a project is accepted as complete by the Commission. This period may be extended fifteen (15) days with consent of the applicant and the Commission. 4.03 COMPLETION AND ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION. • • For private projects involving the issuance of a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies, the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be completed and approved within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date when the Commission accepted the application as complete. Completion of a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration within the 180 -day period shall include completion of the Initial Study, public review and the preparation of documents for approval by the decision making body (see definition Guidelines Section 9.08). In the event that compelling circumstances justify additional time and the project applicant consents thereto, Staff may provide for a reasonable extension of the time limit for completing and adopting the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration. 4.04 COMPLETION AND CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR. For private projects, the Final EIR shall be completed and certified by the Board of Directors within one year after the date when the Commission accepted the application as complete. In the event that compelling circumstances justify additional time, the Board of Directors may provide a one-time extensionup to ninety (90) days for completing and adopting the EIR, upon consent of the Commission and the project applicant. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 4-1 00,0147 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Time Limitations 4.05 PROJECTS SUBJECT TO THE PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT. The Permit Streamlining Act requires agencies to make decisions on development project approvals within specified time limits. If a project is subject to the Act, the Commission cannot require the project applicant to submit the informational equivalent of an EIR or prove compliance with CEQA as a prerequisite to determining whether the project application is complete. In addition, if requested by the project applicant, the Commission must begin processing the project application prior to final CEQA action, provided the information necessary to begin the process is available. Under the Permit Streamlining Act, the Commission as Lead Agency must approve or disapprove the development project application within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date on which it certifies the EIR, or ninety (90) days if an extension for completing and certifying the EIR is granted (see Guidelines Section 4.04). If the Commission adopts a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration, or determines the development project is exempt from CEQA, it shall approve or disapprove the project application within sixty (60) days from the date on which it adopts the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration or determines that the project is exempt from CEQA. Except for waivers of the time periods for preparing a joint Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (as outlined in Government Code Sections 65951 and 65957), The Commission cannot require a waiver of the time limits specified in the Permit Streamlining Act as a condition of accepting or processing a development project application. In addition, the Commission cannot disapprove a development project application in order to comply with the time limits specified in the Permit Streamlining Act. 4.06 PROJECTS, OTHER THAN THOSESUBJECT TO THE PERMIT STREAMLININGACT, WITH SHORT TIME PERIODS FOR APPROVAL. A few statutes require agencies to make decisions on project applications within time limits that are so short that review of the project under CEQA would be difficult. To enable the Commission as Lead Agency to comply with both the enabling statute and CEQA, the Commission shall deem a project application as not received for filing under the enabling statute until such time as the environmental documentation required by CEQA is complete. This section applies where all of the following conditions are met: (a) The enabling statute for a program, other than development projects under Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 65920) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, requires the Commission to take action on an application within a specified period of time of six (6) months or less; (b) The enabling statute provides that the project is approved by operation of law if the Commission fails to take any action within the specified time period; and RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 4-2 000128 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Time Limitations (c) The project application involves the Commission's issuance ofa lease, permit, license, certificate or other entitlement for use. In any case, the environmental document shall be completed or certified and the decision on the application shall be made within the period established by the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Sections 65920, et seq.). 4.07 SUSPENSION OF TIME PERIODS. An unreasonable delay by an applicant in meeting Commission requests necessary for the preparation ofa Negative Declaration or an EIR shall suspend the running of the time periods described in Guidelines Sections 4.03 and 4.04 for the period of the unreasonable delay. Alternately, the Commission may disapprove a project application where there is unreasonable delay in meeting requests. The Commission may also allow a renewed application to start at the same point in the process where the application was when it was disapproved. • • RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 4-3 0001_20 Local Guidelines for Implementing the - California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study 5. INITIAL STUDY 5.01 PREPARATION OF INrnAL STUDY. If the Commission determines that it is the Lead Agency for a project which is not exempt, the Commission shall prepare an Initial Study to ascertain whether the project may have a substantial adverse effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial. All phases of project planning, implementation and operation must be considered in the Initial Study. An Initial Study may rely on expert opinion supported by facts, technical studies or other substantial evidence. However, an Initial Study is neither intended nor required to include the level of detail included in an EIR. (a) (b) For Commission projects, the Initial Study shall be prepared by Staff or by private experts pursuant to contract with the Commission. For private projects, the person or entity proposing to carry out the project shall submit all data and information as may be required by the Commission to determine whether the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. All costs incurred by the Commission in reviewing the data and information submitted, or in conducting its own investigation based upon such data and information, or in preparing an Initial Study for the project shall be borne by theperson or entity proposing to carry out the project. 5.02 INFORMAL CONSULTATION WITH 01IIERAGENCIES . When more than one public agency will be involved in undertaking or approving a project, the Commission as Lead Agency shall consult with all Responsible and any Trustee Agencies. Such consultation shall be undertaken as part of the Initial Study process prior to determining whether an EIR, Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration is required for the project. This early consultation, which may be done quickly and informally, is designed to insure that the EIR, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration will reflect the concerns of all Responsible Agencies that will issue approvals for the project and all Trustee Agencies responsible for natural resources affected by the project. It may include consultation with other individuals or organizations with an interest in the project. The Office of Planning and Research, upon request of the Commission or a private project applicant, shall assist in identifying the various Responsible Agencies for a proposed project and ensure that the Responsible Agencies are notified regarding any early consultation. In the case of a project undertaken by a public agency, the Office of Planning and Research, upon request of the Commission, shall ensure that any Responsible Agency or public agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect to the project is notified regarding any early consultation. If, during the early consultation process it is determined that the project will clearly have a significant effect on the environment, the Commission may immediately dispense with the Initial Study and determine that an EIR is required. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-1 000130 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study • 5.03 CONSULTATION WITH PRIVATE PROJECT APPLICANT. During or immediately after preparation of an Initial Study for a private project, the Commission may consult with the applicant to determine if the applicant is willing to modify the project to reduce or avoid the significant effects identified in the Initial Study. If the project can be revised to avoid or mitigate effects to a level of insignificance and there is no substantial evidence before the Commission that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment, the Commission may prepare and adopt a Negative Declaration. If any significant effect may still occur despite alterations of the project, an EIR must be prepared. 5.04 SCOPING MEETINGS. For a project of "statewide, regional or areawide significance," the School District shall hold at least one scoping meeting. The School District shall provide notice of the scoping meeting to: (a) Any county or city that is within or borders on the School District where the project is located; (b) Any responsible agency; (c) Any public agency that has jurisdiction by law over the project; and (d) Any organization of individuals who has filed a written request for the notice. • • For the definition of projects of "statewide, regional or areawide significance," refer to State Guidelines Section 15206. For a project that may affect highways or other facilities under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation, the School District shall hold a scoping meeting if requested to do so by the Department of Transportation. 5.05 PURPOSES OF Esau", STUDY. The Initial Study shall be used to determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR shall be prepared for a project. It provides written documentation of whether the Commission found evidence of significant adverse impacts which might occur. The purposes of an Initial Study are to: (a) Identify environmental impacts; (b) Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is written; (c) Focus an EIR, if one is required, on potentially significant environmental effects; (d) Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project; (e) Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment; RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-2 nirr Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study (fl Eliminate unnecessary EIRs; and (g) Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used for the project. 5.06 CONTENTS OF INITIAL STUDY. An Initial Study shall contain in brief form: (a) A description of the project, including the location of the project. The project description must be consistent throughout the environmental review process; (b) An identification of the environmental setting; (c) An identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method provided that entries are briefly explained to show the evidence supporting the entries. The brief explanation may be through either a narrative or a reference to other information such as attached maps, photographs, or an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. A reference to another document should include, if possible, a citation to the page or pages where the information is found; (d) A discussion of ways to mitigate any significant effects identified; (e) An examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning and local land use plans; (f) The name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the Initial Study; (g) A summary of any comments regarding the project received from Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies or other persons; and (h) Identification of prior EIRs or environmental documents which could be used with the project. 5.07 USE OF A CHECKLIST INITIAL STUDY. When properly completed, the Environmental Checklist (Form "J") will meet the requirements of Guidelines Section 5.06 for private projects provided that the entries on the checklist are explained. For a Commission -initiated project, the requirements of Guidelines Section 5.06 will be met by use of the Environmental Checklist (Form "J") and a separate attachment containing a description of the project, including its location and an identification of the environmental setting and summaries of any comments received regarding the project. California courts have rejected the use of a bare, unsupplemented Initial Study checklist. An Initial Study must contain more than mere conclusions. It must disclose supporting data or evidence upon which the Commission relied in conducting the Study. The Commission shall augment checklists with supporting factual data and reference information sources when completing the forms. Explanation of all "potential impact" answers should be provided on attached sheets. For controversial projects, it is advisable to state briefly why "no" answers were checked. If practicable, attach an addendum listing commonly used reference material such as plans, traffic studies, air quality data and prior EIRs. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-3 000132 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study • 5.08 EVALUATING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. In evaluating the environmental significance of effects disclosed by the Initial Study, the Commission shall consider: • • (a) Whether the Initial Study and/or any comments received informally during consultations indicate that a fair argument can be made that the project may have a significant adverse environmental impact which cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Even if a fair argument can be made to the contrary, an EIR should be prepared. (b) Whether both primary (direct) and secondary (indirect) consequences of the project were evaluated. Primary consequences are immediately related to the project, while secondary consequences are related more to the primary consequences than to the project itself. For example, secondary impacts upon the resources base, including land, air, water and energy use of an area, may result from population growth, a primary impact. (c) Whether adverse social and economic changes will result from a physical change caused by the project. Adverse economic and social changes resulting from a project are not, in themselves, significant environmental effects. However, if such adverse changes cause physical changes in the environment, those consequences may be used as the basis for finding that the physical change is significant. (d) Whether there is serious public controversy or disagreement among experts over the environmental effects of the project. However, controversy or disagreement alone shall not require preparation of an EIR in the absence of substantial evidence of significant effects. (e) Whether the project meets existing standards for air emissions and water discharges of a particular pollutant (f) Whether the cumulative impact of the project is significant and whether the effects of the project are "cumulatively considerable" (as defined in Guidelines Section 9.09) when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, current projects, and probable future projects. (g) Whether the project may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource. (h) Whether the effect complies with a "standard" (as defined in Guidelines Section 9.41). A change in the environment might not have a significant effect if it complies with a standard created by an appropriate regulatory agency for the purpose of reducing environmental impacts. 5.09 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT. Whenever any of the conditions set forth below are found to exist, a finding that a project may have a significant effect on the environment shall be required: (a) The project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-4 0 $ Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. (b) The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long- term environmental goals. (c) The project has possible environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects as defined in Guidelines Sections 9.09. That is, the Commission is required to determine whether the incremental impacts ofa project are cumulatively considerable by evaluating them against the back -drop of the environmental effects of the other projects. (d) The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on humans either directly or indirectly. 5.10 MANDATORY PREPARATION OF AN EIR FOR WASTE BURNING PROJECTS. The Commission, as Lead Agency, shall prepare or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an EIR or, if appropriate, a modification, addendum, or supplement to an existing EIR for any project involving the burning of municipal wastes, hazardous waste or refuse -derived fuel, including, but not limited to, tires, if the project consists of any of the following: (a) The constriction of a new facility. (b) The expansion of an existing hazardous waste burning facility which would increase its permitted capacity by more than ten percent (10%). (c) The issuance of a hazardous waste facilities permit to a land disposal facility, as defined in Guidelines Section 9.22. (d) The issuance ofa hazardous waste facilities permit to an offsite large treatment facility, as defined in Guidelines Sections 9.23 and 9.32. The Commission shall calculate the percentage of expansion for an existing facility by comparing the proposed facility capacity with either of the following which would be applicable: (a) The facility capacity authorized in the facility's hazardous waste facilities permit pursuant to Section 25200 of the Health and Safety Code, or its grant of interim status pursuant to Section 25200.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or the facility capacity authorized in any state or local agency permit allowing the construction or operation of the facility for the buming of hazardous waste granted before January 1, 1990. (b) The facility capacity authorized in the facility's original hazardous facilities permit, grant of interim status, or any state or local agency permit allowing the construction or operation ofa facility for the burning of hazardous waste, granted on or after January 1, 1990. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-5 • • 000134 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study • • • The EIR requirement does not apply to any project which exclusively burns any of the following: (a) digester gas produced from manure or any other solid or semi -solid animal waste; (b) methane gas produced from a disposal site which is used only for the disposal of solid waste; (c) forest, agricultural, wood or other biomass wastes; (d) hazardous waste in an incineration unit that is transportable and which is either at a site for not longer than three years or is part of a remedial or removal action; (e) refinery waste burned in a flare on the site of generation; (f) methane gas produced at a municipal sewage treatment plant and burned in a flare; (g) hazardous waste, or hazardous waste as a supplemental fuel, as part of a research, development, or demonstration project which, consistent with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, has been determined to be innovative and experimental by the State Department of Health Services and which is limited in type and quantity of waste to that necessary to determine the efficacy and performance capabilities of the technology or process; provided, however, that any facility which operated as a research, development or demonstration project and for which an application is thereafter submitted for a hazardous waste facility permit for operation other than as a research, development or demonstration project shall be considered a new facility for the burning of hazardous waste, and therefore subject to EIR requirements; (h) soils contaminated only with petroleum fuels or the vapors from these soils; (i) exclusively treats less than 3,000 pounds of hazardous waste per day in a thermal processing unit operated in the absence of open flame, and submits a worst -case health risk assessment of the technology to the State Department of Health Services for review and distribution to the interested public. This assessment shall be prepared in accordance with guidelines set forth in the Air Toxics Assessment Manual of the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association; (j) less than 1,200 pounds of infectious waste per day, as defined in Section 25117.5 of the Health and Safety Code, on hospital sites; (k) chemicals and fuels as part of firefighter training; (1) exclusively conducts open bums of explosives subject to the requirements of the local or regional air pollution control district and in compliance with OSHA and Cal -OSHA regulations; or (m) exclusively conducts onsite burning of less than 3,000 pounds per day of fumes directly from a manufacturing or commercial process. Such projects are not exempt from the other requirements of CEQA, the State Guidelines, or these Local Guidelines. This section does not apply to any project over which the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission has assumed jurisdiction per Health and Safety Code Section 25500, et seq, This section also does not apply to projects listed in paragraph three (3) of Guidelines Section 5.10 (c) and (d) if the facilities manage hazardous waste identified or listed on or after January 1, 1992. 5.11 EVALUATING IMPACTS ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-6 GO 35, Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study Projects that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource, as defined in Guidelines Section 9.19, are projects that may have a significant effect on the environment, thus requiring consideration under CEQA. Particular attention and care should be given when considering such projects, especially projects involving the demolition of an historical resource, since such demolitions have been determined to cause a significant effect on the environment. Substantial adverse change in the significance of anhistorical resource means physical demolition, destruction, relocation or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings, such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired. The significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project: (a) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; or (b) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources or its identification in an historical resources survey, unless the Lead Agency establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or (c) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by the Lead Agency for purposes of CEQA. Generally, a project that follows either one of the following sets of standards and guidelines will be considered mitigated to a level of less than significance: (a) the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings; or (b) the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer. In the event of an accidental discovery of a possible historical resource during construction of the project, the Commission may provide for the evaluation of the find by a qualified archaeologist or other professional. If the find is determined to be an historical resource, the Commission should take appropriate steps to implement appropriate avoidance or mitigation measures. Work on non -affected portions of the project, as determined by the Commission, may continue during the process. 5.12 EVALUATING IMPACTS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES. When a project will impact an archaeological site, the Commission shall first determine whether the site is an historical resource, as defined in Guidelines Section 9.19. If the archaeological site is an historical resource, it shall be treated and evaluated as such, and not as an archaeological resource. If the RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-7 000136 " " L o c a l G u i d e l i n e s f o r I m p l e m e n t i n g t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( 2 0 0 2 ) I n i t i a l S t u d y a r c h a e o l o g i c a l s i t e d o e s n o t m e e t t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f a n h i s t o r i c a l r e s o u r c e , b u t d o e s m e e t t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f a u n i q u e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e s e t f o r t h i n S e c t i o n 2 1 0 8 3 . 2 o f t h e P u b l i c R e s o u r c e s C o d e , t h e s i t e s h a l l b e t r e a t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h s a i d p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e P u b l i c R e s o u r c e s C o d e . T h e t i m e a n d c o s t l i m i t a t i o n s d e s c r i b e d i n S e c t i o n 2 1 0 8 3 . 2 ( c - f ) d o n o t a p p l y t o s u r v e y s a n d s i t e e v a l u a t i o n a c t i v i t i e s i n t e n d e d t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r t h e p r o j e c t l o c a t i o n c o n t a i n s u n i q u e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e s . I f t h e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e i s n e i t h e r a u n i q u e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e n o r a n h i s t o r i c a l r e s o u r c e , t h e e f f e c t s o f t h e p r o j e c t o n t h o s e r e s o u r c e s s h a l l n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d a s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t . I t s h a l l b e s u f f i c i e n t t h a t b o t h t h e r e s o u r c e a n d t h e e f f e c t o n i t a r e n o t e d i n t h e I n i t i a l S t u d y o r E I R , i f o n e i s p r e p a r e d t o a d d r e s s i m p a c t s o n o t h e r r e s o u r c e s , b u t t h e y n e e d n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d f u r t h e r i n t h e C E Q A p r o c e s s . I n t h e e v e n t o f a n a c c i d e n t a l d i s c o v e r y o f a p o s s i b l e u n i q u e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e p r o j e c t , t h e C o m m i s s i o n m a y p r o v i d e f o r t h e e v a l u a t i o n o f t h e f i n d b y a q u a l i f i e d a r c h a e o l o g i s t . I f t h e f i n d i s d e t e r m i n e d t o b e a u n i q u e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l r e s o u r c e , t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h o u l d t a k e a p p r o p r i a t e s t e p s t o i m p l e m e n t a p p r o p r i a t e a v o i d a n c e o r m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s . W o r k o n n o n - a f f e c t e d p o r t i o n s o f t h e p r o j e c t , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , m a y c o n t i n u e d u r i n g t h e p r o c e s s . W h e n a n i n i t i a l s t u d y i d e n t i f i e s t h e e x i s t e n c e o f , o r t h e p r o b a b l e l i k e l i h o o d o f , N a t i v e A m e r i c a n h u m a n r e m a i n s w i t h i n t h e P r o j e c t , t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f S t a t e C E Q A G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 1 5 0 6 4 . 5 ( d ) . I n t h e e v e n t o f a n a c c i d e n t a l d i s c o v e r y o r r e c o g n i t i o n o f a n y h u m a n r e m a i n s i n a n y l o c a t i o n o t h e r t h a n a d e d i c a t e d c e m e t e r y , t h e C o m m i s s i o n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f S t a t e C E Q A G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 1 5 0 6 4 . 5 ( e ) . 5 . 1 3 E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T A S S E S S M E N T . T h e j o b o f t h e I n i t i a l S t u d y i s t o i d e n t i f y w h i c h e n v i r o n m e n t a l i m p a c t s m a y b e s i g n i f i c a n t B a s e d u p o n t h e I n i t i a l S t u d y , S t a f f s h a l l d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r a p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t m a y o r w i l l h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t S u c h d e t e r m i n a t i o n s h a l l b e m a d e i n w r i t i n g o n t h e E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t A s s e s s m e n t F o r m ( F o r m " C " ) . I f S t a f f f i n d s t h a t a p r o j e c t w i l l n o t h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t , i t s h a l l r e c o m m e n d t h a t a N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n b e p r e p a r e d a n d a d o p t e d b y t h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y . I f S t a f f f i n d s t h a t a p r o j e c t m a y h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t , b u t t h e e f f e c t s c a n b e m i t i g a t e d t o a l e v e l o f i n s i g n i f i c a n c e , i t s h a l l r e c o m m e n d t h a t a M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n b e p r e p a r e d a n d a d o p t e d b y t h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y . I f S t a f f f i n d s t h a t a p r o j e c t m a y h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t , i t s h a l l r e c o m m e n d t h a t a n E I R b e p r e p a r e d a n d c e r t i f i e d b y t h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y . R C T C / R V P U B / 5 5 6 4 3 8 � 2 0 0 2 B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P 5 - 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 Local Guidelines Tor Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Initial Study 5.14 FINAL DETERMINATION. The Board of Directors shall have the final responsibility for determining whether an EIR, Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be required for any project. The Board of Directors' determination shall be final and conclusive on all persons, including Responsible Agencies and Trustee Agencies, except as provided in Section 15050(c) of the State Guidelines. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 5-9 000138 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration 6. NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6.01 DECISION TO PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. A Negative Declaration (Form "E") shall be prepared for a project subject to CEQA when the Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the project may have a significant or potentially significant adverse effect on the environment. (See Guidelines Sections 9.35 and 9.37.) 6.02 DECISION TO PREPARE A MITTGA1T U NEGATIVE DECLARATION. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (Form "E") shall be prepared for a project subject to CEQA when the Initial Study identifies potentially significant effects on the environment, but: (a) The project applicant has agreed to revise the project or the Commission can revise the project to avoid these significant effects or to mitigate the effects to a point where it is clear that no significant effects would occur and (b) There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Commission that the revised project may have a significant effect. Ifan applicant proposes mitigation measures, the project plans must be revised to incorporate these mitigation measures before the proposed Negative Declaration is released for public review. It is insufficient to require an applicant to adopt mitigation measures after final adoption of the Negative Declaration or to state that mitigation measures will be recommended on the basis of a future study. The Commission must know the measures at the time the Negative Declaration is adopted in order for them to be evaluated and accepted as adequate mitigation. Evidence of agreement by the applicant to such mitigation should be in the record prior to public review. Except where noted, the procedural requirements for the preparation and approval of a Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration are the same. 6.03 CONTRACTING FOR PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION The Commission, when acting as Lead Agency, is responsible for preparing all documents required pursuant to CEQA. The documents may be prepared by Staff or by private consultants pursuant to a contract with the Commission, but they must be the Commission's product and reflect the independent judgment of the Commission. 6.04 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MmGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-1 000139 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration When Staff, based upon the Initial Study, recommends to the decision making body the adoption of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration (Form "D") shall be provided to the public, to all Responsible Agencies and to every other public agency with jurisdiction by law over resources affected by the project at least twenty (20) days before the final adoption of the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration by the decision making body. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be mailed to the last known name and address of all organizations and individuals who have previously filed a written request with the Commission. A copy of the proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study shall be attached to the Notice of Intent to Adopt that is sent to every Responsible Agency and Trustee Agency concerned with the project and every other public agency with jurisdiction by law over resources affected by the project The Commission may charge a fee for this service, except to other public agencies. The Commission may require requests for notices to be renewed annually. If the documents are submitted to the State Clearinghouse for circulation, the public review period shall be at least as long as the period of review by the State Clearinghouse. (See Guidelines Section 6.06.) The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration shall contain the following information: (a) The period during which comments shall be received. (b) The date, time and place of any public meetings or hearings on the proposed project. (c) A brief description of the proposed project and its location. (d) The address where copies of the proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration and all documents referenced in the proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration are available for review. (e) The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") list on which the proposed project site is located, if applicable, and the corresponding information from the applicant's statement. (See Guidelines Section 2.04.) (fl The significant effects on the environment, if any, anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study must reflect the independent judgment of the Commission. 6.05 POSTING AND PUBLICATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. The Commission shall have a copy of the Notice of Intent to Adopt, the Draft Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study posted at the Commission's offices and made available for public inspection. The Notice must be provided either twenty (20) or thirty (30) days prior to final adoption of the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-2 000140 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration The Notice must also be posted in the office of the Clerk in each county in which the Project is located and must remain posted for a minimum of twenty (20) days, unless otherwise required by law to be posted for thirty (30) days. The Clerk shall post the Notice within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt. As stated in Guidelines Section 6.04, notice shall be given by mail to the last known name and address of all organizations and individuals who have previously requested such notice. In addition, it must be given by at least one of the following procedures: (a) Publication at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed project. If more than one area will be affected, the notice shall be published in the newspaper of largest circulation from among the newspapers of general circulation in those areas. (b) Posting of notice on and off site in the area where the project is to be located. (c) Direct mailing to owners and occupants of property contiguous to the project, as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll. The Commission shall consider all comments received during the public review period for the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. Although the Commission is not required to respond in writing to comments it receives either during or after the public review period, the Commission may want to provide a written response to all comments if it will not delay action on the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, since any comment received prior to final action on the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration can form the basis of a legal challenge. A written response which refutes the comment or adequately explains the Commission's action in light of the comment, will assist the Commission in defending against a legal challenge. The Commission shall notify any public agency which comments on a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration of the public hearing or hearings, if any, on the project for which the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. 6.06 SUBMISSION OFNEGATIVEDECLARATIONORMIITGATEDNEGATIVED ECLARATIONTOSTATE CLEARINGHOUSE A Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration must be submitted to the State Clearinghouse for circulation in the following situations: (a) The Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared by a Lead Agency that is a state agency. (b) The Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is prepared by a public agency where a state agency is a Responsible Agency, Trustee Agency, or otherwise has jurisdiction by law with respect to the project. (c) The Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is for a project identified in State Guidelines Section 15206 as being of statewide, regional, or areawide significance. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-3 000141 Local Guidelines for Implementing the - California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration State Guidelines Section 15206 identifies the following types of projects as being of statewide, regional, or areawide significance and requiring submission to the State Clearinghouse for circulation: •Projects which have the potential for causing significant environmental effects beyond the city or county where the project would be located, such as: •Residential development of more than 500 units. •Commercial projects employing more than 1,000 persons or covering more than 500,000 square feet of floor space. •Office building projects employing more than 1,000 persons or covering more than 250,000 square feet of floor space. •Hotel or motel development of more than 500 rooms. •Industrial projects housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or covering more than 650,000 square feet of floor area. •Projects for the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract covering more than 100 acres. •Projects in one of the following Environmentally Sensitive Areas: •Lake Tahoe Basin. •Santa Monica Mountains Zone. •Sacramento -San Joaquin River Delta. •Suisun Marsh. •Coastal Zone, as defined by the California Coastal Act. •Areas within one -quarter mile of a river designated as wild and scenic. •Areas within the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. •Projects which would affect sensitive wildlife habitats or the habitats of any rare, threatened, or endangered species. •Projects which would interfere with water quality standards. •Projects which would provide housing, jobs, or occupancy for 500 or more people within 10 miles of a nuclear power plant. A Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration may also be submitted to the State Clearinghouse for circulation if a state agency has special expertise with regard to the environmental impacts involved. When the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review, the public review period shall be at least thirty (30) days. When a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is submitted to the State Clearinghouse, a Notice of Completion (Form "H") should be included as a cover sheet. Fifteen (15) copies of the documents must be sent to the State Clearinghouse for circulation. In addition to the printed copies, a copy of the document in electronic format shall be submitted on a diskette or by electronic mail transmission if available. A shorter review period by the State Clearinghouse for a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration can be requested by the decision making body. The shortened review period shall not be less than twenty (20) days. Such a request must be made in writing by the Lead Agency to the RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-4 • 000142 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration Office of Planning and Research. The decision making body may designate by resolution or ordinance an individual authorized to request a shorter review period. Any approval of a shortened review period must be given prior to, and reflected in, the public notice. However, a shortened review period shall not be approved by the Office of Planning and Research for any proposed project of statewide, regional or areawide environmental significance, as defined by State Guidelines Section 15206. 6.07 SPECIAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE AND FUEL BURNING PROJECTS. For any waste burning project, as defined in Guidelines Section 5.10, Notice of Intent (see Guidelines Section 6.04) shall be given to all organizations and individuals who have previously requested it and shall also be given by all three of the procedures listed in Guidelines Section 6.05. In addition, Notice shall be given by direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property within one-fourth mile of any parcel or parcels on which such a project is located. These notice requirements apply only to those projects described in Guidelines Section 5.10. These notice requirements do not preclude the Commission from providing additional notice by other means if desired. 6.08 CONTENT OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION. A Negative Declaration must be prepared directly by or under contract to the Commission and should generally resemble Form "E". It shall contain the following information: (a) A brief description of the project proposed, including any commonly used name for the project, if any. (b) The location of the project and the name of the project proponent. (c) A finding that the project as proposed will not have a significant effect on the environment. (d) An attached copy of the Initial Study documenting reasons to support the finding. (e) For a Mitigated Negative Declaration, feasible mitigation measures included in the project to substantially lessen or avoid potentially significant effects, which must be fully enforceable through peunit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Such permit conditions, agreements, and measures must be consistent with applicable constitutional requirements such as the "nexus" and "rough proportionality" standards established by case law. 6.09 ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Following the publication, posting or mailing of the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, but in no event sooner than twenty (20) days following the date of such publication, posting or mailing, the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration may be presented to the decision making body at a regular or special meeting. Prior to adoption, the Commission shall independently review and analyze the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-5 000143 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration Declaration and find that the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the Commission. If the decision making body finds that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, it shall adopt the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. When adopting the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Commission shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which it based its decision. If the decision making body finds that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment that cannot be mitigated or avoided, it shall order the preparation of a Draft EIR and the filing of a Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR. Recirculation should be considered if substantial new mitigation is added after public review (see Guidelines Section 6.12). 6.10 MITIGATION REPORTING OR MONITORING PROGRAM FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. When adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to Guidelines Section 6.09, the Commission shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program to assure that mitigation measures which are required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment will be fully enforceable through pennit conditions, agreements, or other measures and implemented by the project proponent or other responsible party in a timely manner, in accordance with conditions of project approval. The Commission shall also specify the location and the custodian of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which it based its decision. There is no requirement that the reporting or monitoring program be circulated for public review; however, the Commission may choose to circulate it for public comments along with the Negative Declaration. The mitigation measures required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment must be adopted as conditions of project approval. This reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to assure compliance during the implementation or construction of a project and shall otherwise comply with the requirements described in Guidelines Section 7.31. Ifa Responsible Agency or Trustee Agency has required that certain conditions be incorporated into the project, the Commission may request that agency to prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. The Commission shall also require that prior to the close of the public review period for a Mitigated Negative Declaration (see Guidelines Section 6.04), the Responsible or Trustee Agency submit detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures, or refer the Commission to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to the Commission by a Responsible or Trustee Agency shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are within the Responsible or Trustee Agency's authority. Local agencies have the authority to levy fees sufficient to pay for this program. Therefore, the Commission can charge the project proponent a fee to cover actual costs of program processing and implementation. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-6 • • 000144 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration • Transportation information resulting from the reporting or monitoring program required to be adopted by the School District shall be submitted to the regional transportation planning agency where the project is located and to the Department of Transportation for a project of statewide, regional or area -wide significance according to State Guidelines section 15006. The transportation planning agency and the Department of Transportation are is -required by law to adopt guidelines for the submittal of these reporting or monitoring programs, so the School District may wish to tailor its submittal to such guidelines. 6.11 APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF PROJECT. At the time of adoption of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, the decision making body may consider the project for purposes of approval or disapproval. Prior to approving the project, the decision making body shall consider the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with any written comments received and considered during the public review period, and shall approve or disapprove the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. In making a finding as to whether there is any substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the factors listed in Guidelines Section 5.08 should be considered. (See Guidelines Section 7.29 for approval requirements for facilities which may emit hazardous air emissions near schools.) 6.12 RECIRCULATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGAI'Eu NEGATIVE DECLARATION. • • A Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration must be recirculated when the document must be substantially revised after the public review period but prior to its adoption. A "substantial revision" is defined as a new and avoidable significant effect for which mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to a level ofinsignificance. A "substantial revision" can also include when the Commission determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce the potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required. Recirculation is not required under the following circumstances: (a) Mitigation measures are replaced with equal or more effective measures. (b) New project revisions are added in response to written or oral comments on the project's effects identified in the proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration which are not new avoidable significant effects. (c) Measures or conditions ofproject approval are added after circulation of the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration which are not required by CEQA, which do not create new significant environmental effects and are not necessary to mitigate an avoidable significant effect. (d) New information is added to the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Declaration which merely clarifies, amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications to the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-7 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration If, after preparation of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Commission determines that the project requires an EIR, it shall circulate the Draft EIR for consultation and review and advise reviewers in writing that a proposed Negative Declaration or Mitigated Declaration had previously been circulated for the project. 6.13 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ON A PROJECT FOR WHICH A PROPOSED NEGATIVE OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN APPROVED. Following consideration and approval of a project for which the Commission is Lead Agency, the decision making body shall order Staff to prepare and file a Notice of Determination (Form "F") which shall contain the following: (a) An identification of the project including its common name where possible and its location; (b) A brief description of the project; (c) The date on which the Commission approved the project; (d) The determination of the Commission that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; (e) A statement that a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of CEQA; and (f) The address where a copy of the Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration may be examined. The Notice of Determination shall be filed with the Clerk of each county in which the project will be located within five working days of project approval. The Commission is encouraged to make copies of filed notices available in electronic format on the Internet. Such electronic notices are in addition to the posting requirements of the CEQA Guidelines and the Public Resources Code. The Clerk must post the Notice of Determination within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt. The Notice must be posted in the office of the Clerk for a minimum of thirty (30) days. Thereafter, the Clerk shall return the notice to the Commission with a notation of the period it was posted. The Commission shall retain the notice for not less than nine (9) months. If the project requires discretionary approval from any State agency, the Notice of Determination shall also be filed with the Office of Planning and Research within five (5) working days of project approval along with proof of payment of the California Department of Fish and Game fee or Certificate of Fee Exemption (see guidelines Section 6.17). Simultaneously with the filing of the Notice of Determination with the Clerk, Staff shall cause a copy of the Notice of Determination to be posted at the Commission office. When a request is made for a copy of the Notice prior to the date on which the Commission adopts the Negative Declaration, the copy must be mailed, first class postage prepaid, within five (5) days of the Commission's determination. If such a request is made following the Commission's determination, then the copy should be mailed in the same manner as soon as possible. The recipients of such documents may be charged a fee reasonably related to the cost of providing the service. The filing and posting of a Notice of Determination with the Clerk, and, if necessary, with the Office of Planning and Research, usually starts a thirty (30) day statute of limitations on court challenges to the RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-8 000146 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration approval under CEQA. When separate notices are filed for successive phases of the same overall project, the 30 -day statute of limitation to challenge the subsequent phase begins to run when the second notice is filed. Failure to file the Notice results in a one hundred eighty (180) day statute of limitations. 6.14 ADDENDUM TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION. The Commission may prepare an addendum to an adopted Negative Declaration if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary. The Commission may also prepare an addendum to an adopted negative declaration when none ofthe conditions calling for a subsequent negative declaration have occurred. (See Guidelines Section 6.15 below.) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be attached to the adopted Negative Declaration. The Commission shall consider the addendum with the adopted Negative Declaration prior to project approval. 6.15 SUBSEQUENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION. When a Negative Declaration has been adopted for a project, or when an EIR has been certified, a subsequent Negative Declaration or EIR must be prepared in the following instances: (a) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions ofthe previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (b) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (c) New information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise ofreasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified or the Negative Declaration was adopted which shows any of the following: (1) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; (2) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (3) Mitigation measure(s) or alternative(s) previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents declined to adopt the mitigation measure(s) or alternative(s); or (4) Mitigation measures) or altemative(s) which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure(s) or altemative(s). RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-9 000147, Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration The Commission as Lead Agency would then determine whether a Subsequent EIR, Negative Declaration or addendum would be applicable. Subsequent Negative Declarations must be given the same notice and public review period as other Negative Declarations. The Subsequent Negative Declaration shall state where the previous document is available and can be reviewed. 6.16 PRIVATE PROJECT COSTS. For private projects, the person or entity proposing to carry out the project shall bear all costs incurred by the Commission in preparing the Initial Study and in preparing and filing the Negative Declaration and Notice of Determination. 6.17 FILING FEES FOR PROJECTS WHICH AFFECT WILDLIFE RESOURCES. At the time a Notice of Determination for a Negative Declaration is filed with the Clerk, a fee of $1,250 shall be paid to the Clerk for projects which will adversely affect fish and wildlife resources. These fees are collected by the Clerk on behalf of the California Department of Fish and Game ("DFG"). Only one filing fee is required for each project unless the project is tiered or phased and separate environmental documents are prepared. For projects where a Lead Agency and Responsible Agencies file separate Notices of Determination, only the Lead Agency is required to pay the fee. Note: The Clerk customarily charges a documentary handling fee for each project in addition to the filing fee specified above. Refer to the Index in the Staff Summary to help determine the correct amount. For private projects, the Commission shall pass these costs on to the project applicant. No fees are required for projects with a "de minimis" effect on fish and wildlife resources, or for certain projects undertaken by the DFG and implemented through a contract with a non-profit entity or local government agency. A project with a "de minimis" effect has no potential for adverse effect on fish and wildlife. This is an important exception. DFG considers the following projects as likely to have "de minimis" effects on fish and wildlife, depending on the specific facts of each project: (1) Projects which enhance fish and wildlife and their habitats and result in no accompanying adverse impacts to fish or wildlife; (2) Lot line adjustments; (3) Building remodeling; (4) Annexations; (5) Redevelopment on existing urban subdivisions with no wildlife habitat; (6) Infill of undeveloped urban lots; RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-10 000148` Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Negative Declaration (7) Adoption of a General Plan, where CEQA requires a subsequent discretionary project approval before any physical change to natural habitat is permitted. If the Commission believes that a project will have a "de minimis" effect on wildlife resources, it should file the Certificate of Fee Exemption attached as Form "L". This form requires the Commission to set forth facts in support of the fee exemption. These facts should include: (1) the name and address of the project proponent; (2) a brief description of the project and its location; (3) a statement that an initial study has been prepared by the Commission to evaluate the project's effects on wildlife resources, if any; (4) a declaration that there is no evidence before the Commission that the project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources; and (5) a declaration that the Commission has, on the basis of substantial evidence, "rebutted" the presumption of adverse effect contained in the regulations. A presumption of adverse effect occurs if the project has the potential for adverse effects on the fish and wildlife resources as listed on Form "L". To rebut the presumption of adverse effect, the Commission should explain in the declaration why the project would not have an adverse impact on fish and wildlife and reference any supporting evidence. These findings should be made at the time of approval of the Negative Declaration and attached to Form "L" when submitted to the County. Two copies of this form must be filed with the Notice of Determination in order to obtain the fee exemption. Ifthe Commission believes that a project has been undertaken by the DFG, that the project's costs are payable from one or more of the sources indicated in the Fish and Game Code, and that the project is being implemented through a contract with a non-profit entity or a local government agency, the DFG filing does not apply. Since the DFG has not yet adopted regulations to govern this exemption, including a new "Certificate of Fee Exemption," the Commission may wish to use Form L and make appropriate modifications to reflect this exemption. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 6-11 000149 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report 7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 7.01 DECISION TO PREPARE AN EIR. An EIR shall be prepared whenever there is substantial evidence in light of the whole record which supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. (See Guidelines Sections 9.35 and 9.37.) The record may include the Initial Study or other documents or studies prepared to assess the project's environmental impacts. 7.02 CONTRACTING FOR PREPARATION OF EIRs. If a Draft EIR, EIR or Focused EIR is prepared under a contract to the Commission, the contract must be executed within forty-five (45) days from the date on which the Commission sends a Notice of Preparation. The Commission may take longer to execute the contract if the project applicant and the Commission mutually agree to an extension of the 45 -day time limit. The Draft EIR, EIR or Focused EIR prepared under contract must be the Commission's product. Staff, together with such consultant help as may be required, shall independently review and analyze the Draft EIR, EIR or Focused EIR to verify its accuracy, objectivity and completeness prior to presenting it to the decision making body. The Draft EIR, EIR or Focused EIR made available for public review must reflect the independent judgment of the Commission. Staffmay require such information and data from the person or entity proposing to carry out the project as it deems necessary for completion of the Draft EIR, EIR or Focused EIR. 7.03 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR. After Staff determines that an EIR will be required for a proposed project, the Commission as Lead Agency shall prepare and send a Notice of Preparation (Form "G") to each Responsible Agency and Trustee Agency involved with the project, as well as the Office ofPlanning and Research. When submitting the Notice of Preparation to the Office of Planning and Research, a Notice of Completion (Form "H") should be used as a cover sheet. Responsible and Trustee Agencies have thirty (30) days to respond to the Notice of Preparation. The Commission shall send copies of the Notice of Preparation by certified mail or any other method of transmittal which provides it with a record that the Notice was received. The Notice must also be posted in the office of the Clerk in each county in which the project is located for thirty (30) days. The Clerk shall post the Notice within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt. At a minimum, the Notice of Pi -paration shall include: (a) A description of the project; RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-1 000150 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report (b) The location of the project indicated either on an attached map (preferably a copy of the USGS 15' or 7% topographical map identified by quadrangle name) or by a street address in an urban area; (c) The probable environmental effects of the project; (d) The name and address of the consulting firm retained to prepare the Draft EIR, if applicable; and (e) The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") list on which the proposed site is located, if applicable, and the corresponding information from the applicant's statement. (See Guidelines Section 2.04.) 7.04 PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIIL The Commission as Lead Agency is responsible for preparing a Draft EIR, and may begin preparation immediately without awaiting responses to the Notice of Preparation. However, information communicated to the Commission not later than thirty (30) days after receipt of the Commission's Notice of Preparation shall be included in the Draft EIR. 7.05 CONSULTATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND PERSONS. • • To expedite consultation in response to the Notice of Preparation, the Commission as Lead Agency, a Responsible Agency, or a project applicant may request a meeting among the agencies involved to assist the Commission in determining the scope and content of the environmental information that Responsible Agencies may require. The Commission must convene the meeting as soon as possible but no later than 30 days after the request. Prior to completion of the Draft EIR, the Commission shall consult with each Responsible Agency and any public agency which has jurisdiction by law over the project The Commission shall also consult with any city or county which borders the project or within which the project is located, unless otherwise designated annually by agreement between the Commission and any other city or county. The Commission may also consult with any individual who has special expertise with respect to any environmental impacts involved with a project The Commission may also consult directly with any person or organization it believes will be concerned with the environmental effects of the project including any interested individuals and organizations of which the Commission is reasonably aware. The purpose of this consultation is to "scope" the EIR's range of analysis. For a project of statewide, regional, or areawide significance as defined in State Guidelines Section 15206, the Commission shall hold at least one scoping meeting. Likewise, for a project that may affect highways or other facilities under the jurisdiction of the State Department of Transportation, the School District shall hold a scoping meeting if requested to do so by the Department of Transportation. See Guidelines Section 5.04 for more information on these requirements. A Responsible Agency or other public agency shall only make comments regarding those activities within its area of expertise or which are required to be carried out or approved by it. These comments must be supported by specific documentation. Any mitigation measures submitted to the Commission by RCTC/RVPUBl556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-2 004151 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report a Responsible or Trustee Agency shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are within the Responsible or Trustee Agency's authority. For projects where federal involvement might require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement ("EIS") under the National Environmental Policy Act ('NEPA"), the Commission as Lead Agency shall consult with the appropriate federal agencies as provided in Section 15110 and Sections 15220-15228 of the State Guidelines. In addition, the Commission shall notify the appropriate federal agencies regarding any scoping meetings for proposed projects that require preparation of an EIS. 7.06 EARLY CONSULTATION ON PROJECTS INVOLVING PERMIT ISSUANCE. Where the project involves issuance of a lease, permit, license, certificate or other entitlement for use by one or more public agencies, the Commission, upon request of the applicant, shall meet with the applicant prior to the filing of the application regarding the range of actions, potential alternatives, mitigation measures and significant effects to be analyzed in depth in the ElR. The Commission may also consult with concerned persons identified by the applicant and persons who have made written requests to be consulted. Such requests must be made not later than thirty (30) days after the Commission's decision to prepare an EIR. 7.07 AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN. When the Commission prepares an EIR for a project within the boundaries of a comprehensive airport land use plan or, if such a plan has not been adopted for a project within two (2) nautical miles of a public airport or public use airport, the Commission shall utilize the Airport Land Use Planning Handbook published by Caltrans' Division of Aeronautics to assist in the preparation of the EIR relative to potential airport or related safety hazards and noise problems. 7.08 GENERAL ASPECTS OF AN EIR. Both a Draft and Final EIR must contain the information outlined in Guidelines Section 7.12. Each element must be covered, and when elements are not separated into distinct sections, the document must state where in the document each element is covered. The body of the EIR shall include summarized technical data, maps, diagrams and similar relevant information. Highly technical and specialized analyses and data should be included in appendices. Appendices may be prepared in separate volumes, but must be equally available to the public for examination. All documents used in preparation of the EIR must be referenced. An EIR shall not include "trade secrets," locations of archaeological sites and sacred lands, or any other information subject to the disclosure restrictions of the Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250, et seq.). RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-3 00`0152 " " " L o c a l G u i d e l i n e s f o r I m p l e m e n t i n g t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( 2 0 0 2 ) E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t T h e E I R s h o u l d d i s c u s s e n v i r o n m e n t a l e f f e c t s i n p r o p o r t i o n t o t h e i r s e v e r i t y a n d p r o b a b i l i t y o f o c c u r r e n c e . E f f e c t s d i s m i s s e d i n t h e I n i t i a l S t u d y a s c l e a r l y i n s i g n i f i c a n t a n d u n l i k e l y t o o c c u r n e e d n o t b e d i s c u s s e d . T h e I n i t i a l S t u d y s h o u l d b e u s e d t o f o c u s t h e E I R s o t h a t t h e E I R i d e n t i f i e s a n d d i s c u s s e s o n l y t h e s p e c i f i c e n v i r o n m e n t a l p r o b l e m s o r a s p e c t s o f t h e p r o j e c t w h i c h h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d a s p o t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t o r i m p o r t a n t . A c o p y o f t h e I n i t i a l S t u d y s h a l l b e a t t a c h e d t o t h e E I R t o p r o v i d e a b a s i s f o r l i m i t i n g t h e i m p a c t s d i s c u s s e d . T h e E I R s h a l l c o n t a i n a s t a t e m e n t b r i e f l y i n d i c a t i n g t h e r e a s o n f o r d e t e r m i n i n g t h a t v a r i o u s e f f e c t s o f a p r o j e c t t h a t c o u l d p o s s i b l y b e c o n s i d e r e d s i g n i f i c a n t w e r e n o t f o u n d t o b e s i g n i f i c a n t a n d c o n s e q u e n t l y w e r e n o t d i s c u s s e d i n d e t a i l i n t h e E I R . T h e C o m m i s s i o n s h o u l d a l s o n o t e a n y c o n c l u s i o n b y i t t h a t a p a r t i c u l a r i m p a c t i s t o o s p e c u l a t i v e f o r e v a l u a t i o n . T h e E I R s h o u l d o m i t u n n e c e s s a r y d e s c r i p t i o n s o f p r o j e c t s a n d e m p h a s i z e f e a s i b l e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a n d a l t e r n a t i v e s t o p r o j e c t s . 7 . 0 9 U S E O F R E G I S T E R E D C O N S U L T A N T S I N P R E P A R I N G E I R S . A n E I R i s n o t a t e c h n i c a l d o c u m e n t t h a t c a n b e p r e p a r e d o n l y b y a r e g i s t e r e d c o n s u l t a n t o r p r o f e s s i o n a l . H o w e v e r , s t a t e s t a t u t e s m a y p r o v i d e t h a t o n l y r e g i s t e r e d p r o f e s s i o n a l s c a n p r e p a r e c e r t a i n t e c h n i c a l s t u d i e s w h i c h w i l l b e u s e d i n o r w h i c h w i l l c o n t r o l t h e d e t a i l e d d e s i g n , c o n s t r u c t i o n , o r o p e r a t i o n o f t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t a n d w h i c h w i l l b e p r e p a r e d i n s u p p o r t o f a n E I R . 7 . 1 0 I N C O R P O R A T I O N B Y R E F E R E N C E A n E I R m a y i n c o r p o r a t e b y r e f e r e n c e a l l o r p o r t i o n s o f a n o t h e r d o c u m e n t w h i c h i s a m a t t e r o f p u b l i c r e c o r d o r i s g e n e r a l l y a v a i l a b l e t o t h e p u b l i c . A n y i n c o r p o r a t e d d o c u m e n t s h a l l b e c o n s i d e r e d t o b e s e t f o r t h i n f u l l a s p a r t o f t h e t e x t o f t h e E I R . W h e r e p a r t o f a n o t h e r d o c u m e n t i s i n c o r p o r a t e d b y r e f e r e n c e , t h a t d o c u m e n t s h a l l b e m a d e a v a i l a b l e t o t h e p u b l i c f o r i n s p e c t i o n a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s o f f i c e s . T h e E I R s h a l l s t a t e w h e r e i n c o r p o r a t e d d o c u m e n t s w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e f o r i n s p e c t i o n . W h e r e a n E I R u s e s i n c o r p o r a t i o n b y r e f e r e n c e , t h e i n c o r p o r a t e d p a r t o f t h e r e f e r e n c e d d o c u m e n t s h a l l b e b r i e f l y s u m m a r i z e d w h e r e p o s s i b l e , o r b r i e f l y d e s c r i b e d i f t h e d a t a o r i n f o r m a t i o n c a n n o t b e s u m m a r i z e d . W h e n i n f o r m a t i o n f r o m a n E I R t h a t h a s p r e v i o u s l y b e e n r e v i e w e d t h r o u g h t h e s t a t e r e v i e w s y s t e m ( " S t a t e C l e a r i n g h o u s e " ) i s i n c o r p o r a t e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , t h e s t a t e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n n u m b e r o f t h e i n c o r p o r a t e d d o c u m e n t s h o u l d b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e s u m m a r y o r t e x t o f t h e E l R . R C T C / R V P U B / 5 5 6 4 3 8 � 2 0 0 2 B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P 7 - 4 1 ) 0 0 5 3 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report 7.11 STANDARDS FOR ADEQUACY OF AN EIR. An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which takes into account the environmental consequences of the project. The evaluation of environmental effects need not be exhaustive, but must be within the scope of what is reasonably feasible. The EIR should be written and presented in such a way that it can be understood by governmental decision makers and members of the public. A good faith effort at completeness is necessary. The adequacy of an EIR is assessed in terms of what is reasonable in light of factors such as the magnitude of the project at issue, the severity of its likely environmental impacts, and the geographic scope of the project. CEQA does not require a Lead Agency to conduct every test or perform all research, study, and experimentation recommended or demanded by commentors. There is no need to unreasonably delay adoption of an EIR in order to include results of studies in progress, even if those studies will shed some additional light on subjects related to the project. 7.12 FORM AND CONTENT OF EIR. The text of the EIR should normally be less than 150 pages. For proposals of unusual scope or complexity, the EIR should normally be less than 300 pages. The required contents of an EIR are set forth in Sections 15122 through 15132 of the State Guidelines. Briefly summarizing each of those requirements, an EIR shall contain: (a) A table of contents or an index. (b) A brief summary of the proposed project and its environmental impacts. (c) A description of the proposed project, including its underlying purpose and a list of permit and other approvals required to implement the project. (See Guidelines Section 7.16 regarding analysis of future project expansion.) (d) A description of the project's physical environmental conditions from both a local and regional perspective at the time the Notice of Preparation is published, or if no Notice of Preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis begins. (State Guidelines Section 15125.) This environmental setting will normally constitute the baseline physical conditions by which the Commission determines whether an impact is significant. (e) A discussion of any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general and regional plans. (f) A description of the direct and indirect significant environmental impacts of the proposed project explaining which, if any, can be avoided or mitigated to a level of insignificance, indicating reasons that various possible significant effects were determined not to be significant and denoting any significant effects which are unavoidable or could not be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Direct and indirect significant effects shall be clearly identified and described, giving due consideration to both short-tenn and long-term effects. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-5 (:00154 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report • • (g) (h) An analysis of a range of alternatives to the proposed project which could feasibly attain the project's objectives as discussed in Guidelines Section 7.15. A description of any significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented if, and only if, the EIR is being prepared in connection with (1) The adoption, amendment, or enactment of a plan, policy, or ordinance of a public agency; (2) The adoption by a Local Agency Formation Commission of a resolution making determinations; or (3) A project which will be subject to the requirement for preparing an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. (I) An analysis of the growth -inducing impacts of the proposed action. The discussion should include ways in which the project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. (j) A discussion of any significant, reasonably anticipated future developments and the cumulative effects of all proposed and anticipated action as discussed in Guidelines Section 7.16. (k) In certain situations, a regional analysis should be completed for certain impacts, such as air quality. (1) A discussion of any economic or social effects, to the extent that they cause or may be used to determine significant environmental impacts. (m) A statement briefly indicating the reasons that various possible significant effects of a project were determined not to be significant and, therefore, were not discussed in the EIR. (n) The identity of all federal, state or local agencies or other organizations and private individuals consulted in preparing the EIR, and the identity of the persons, firm or agency preparing the EIR, by contract or other authorization. To the fullest extent possible, the Commission should integrate CEQA review with these related environmental review and consultation requirements. (o) A discussion of those potential effects of the proposed project on the environment which the Commission has determined are or may be significant. The discussion on other effects may be limited to a brief explanation as to why those effects are not potentially significant. (p) A description of feasible measures, as set forth in Guidelines Section 7.14, which could minimize significant adverse impacts. 7.13 ANALYSIS OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS. An EIR must discuss cumulative impacts when the project's incremental effect is "cumulatively considerable" as defined in Guidelines Section 9.07. Where the Commission is examining a project with an incremental effect that is not "cumulatively considerable," it need not consider that effect significant, but must briefly describe the basis for this conclusion. A project's contribution is less than cumulatively considerable if the project is required to implement or fund its fair share of a mitigation measure designed to alleviate the cumulative impact. The Commission must identify facts and analysis supporting its conclusion that the cumulative impact is less than significant. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 7-6 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 00 1 5 5 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report (a) A cumulative impact consists of an impact which is created as a result of the combination of the project evaluated in the EIR together with other projects causing related impacts. An EIR should not discuss impacts which do not result in part from the project evaluated in the EIR. (b) The discussion of cumulative impacts in an E,1R must focus on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects contribute, rather than the attributes of other projects which do not contribute to the cumulative impact. The discussion of significant cumulative impacts must meet either of the following elements: (1) A list of past, present, and probable future projects causing related or cumulative impacts including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the Commission; or (2) A summary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related planning document, or in a prior environmental document which has been adopted or certified, which described or evaluated regional or area wide conditions contributing to the cumulative impact. (c) When utilizing a list, as suggested above, factors to consider when determining whether to include a related project should include the nature of each environmental resource being examined and the location and type of project. Location may be important, for example, when water quality impacts are involved since projects outside the watershed would probably not contribute to a cumulative effect. Project type may be important, for example, when the impact is specialised, such as a particular air pollutant or mode of traffic. (d) The Commission should define the geographic scope of the area affected by the cumulative effect and provide a reasonable explanation for the geographic limitation used. (e) A cumulative impacts discussion contained in previously certified EIRs may be incorporated by reference pursuant to the provisions for tiering and program EIRs. 7.14 ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION MEASURES. The discussion of mitigation measures in an EIR must distinguish between measures proposed by project proponents and other measures proposed by Lead, Responsible or Trust Agencies. This discussion shall identify mitigation measures for each significant environmental effect identified in the EIR. Where several measures are available to mitigate an impact, each should be disclosed and the basis for selecting a particular measure should be identified. Formulation of mitigation measures should not be deferred until some future time. However, measures may specify performance standards which would mitigate the significant effects of the project and which may be accomplished in more than one specified way. If a mitigation measure would cause one or more significant effects in addition to those that would be caused by the project as proposed, the effects of the mitigation measure shall be disclosed but in less detail than the significant effects of the project itself. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-7 • 000156 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report Mitigation measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other legally binding instruments. In the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulating, or other public project, mitigation measures can be incorporated into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. Mitigation measures must also be consistent with all applicable constitutional requirements such as the "nexus" and "rough proportionality" standards. Where maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or reconstruction of the historical resource will be conducted in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer, the project's impact on the historical resource shall generally be considered mitigated below a level of significance and thus is not significant. The Commission should, whenever feasible, seek to avoid damaging effects on any historical resource of an archaeological nature. The following factors must be considered and discussed in an EIR for a project involving such an archaeological site: (a) (b) Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to archaeological sites. Preservation in place may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, the following: (1) Planning construction to avoid archaeological sites; (2) Incorporation of sites within parks, green space, or other open spaces; (3) Covering the archaeological sites with a layer of chemically stable soil before building tennis courts, parking lots, or similar facilities on the site; (4) Deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. When data recovery through excavation is the only feasible mitigation, a data recovery plan, which makes provision for adequately recovering the scientifically consequential information from and about the historical resource, shall be prepared and adopted prior to excavation. Such studies must be deposited with the California Historical Resources Regional Information Center. Data recovery shall not be required for an historical resource if the Commission determines that existing testing or studies have adequately recovered the scientifically consequential information from and about the archaeological or historical resource, provided that the determination is documented in the EIR and that the studies are deposited with the California Historical Resources Regional Information Center. 7.15 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES IN AN EIR. The alternatives analysis must describe and evaluate the comparative merits of a range of reasonable alternatives to the project or to the location of the project which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project, but which would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project, and it need RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-8 000157 A �. Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report not consider altematives which are infeasible. Rather, it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation. Purpose of the Alternatives Analysis: An EIR must identify ways to mitigate or avoid the significant effects that a project may have on the environment. For this reason, a discussion of alternatives must focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effect of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives or would be more costly. Selection of a Range of Reasonable Alternatives: The range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic purposes of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects, even if those alternatives would be more costly or would impede to some degree the attainment of the project's objectives. The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the alternatives to be discussed. The EIR should also identify any alternatives that were considered by the Commission and rejected as infeasible during the scoping process, and briefly explain the reasons for rejection. Additional information explaining the choice of altematives should be included in the administrative record. Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (a) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives; (b) infeasibility; or (c) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts. Evaluation of Alternatives: The EIR shall include sufficient information about each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis and comparison with the proposed project. A matrix displaying the major characteristics and significant environmental effects of each alternative may be used to summarize the comparison. If an alternative would cause one or more significant effects in addition to those that would be caused by the project as proposed, the significant effects of the alternative shall be discussed but in less detail than the significant effects of the project as proposed. The Rule of Reason: The range of alternatives required in an EIR is governed by a "rule of reason" which courts have held means that an alternatives discussion must be reasonable in scope and content. Therefore, the EIR must set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit public participation, informed decision making, and a reasoned choice. The alternatives shall be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project. Of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only the ones the Commission determines could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives ofthe project. An EIR need not consider an alternative whose effect cannot be reasonably ascertained and whose implementation is remote and speculative. Feasibility of Alternatives: The factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives include: site suitability; economic viability; availability of infrastructure; general plan consistency; other plans or regulatory limitations; jurisdictional boundaries (projects with a regionally significant impact should consider the regional context); and whether the proponent already owns the RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-9 000158 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report alternative site or can reasonably acquire, control or otherwise have access to the site. No one factor establishes a fixed limit on the scope of reasonable alternatives. Alternative Locations: The first step in the alternative location analysis is to determine whether any of the significant effects of the project could be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the project in another location. This is the key question in this analysis. Only locations that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project need be considered for inclusion in the EIR. The second step in this analysis is to determine whether any of the alternative locations are feasible. If the Commission concludes that no feasible alternative locations exist, it must disclose its reasons, and it should include them in the EIR. Where a previous document has sufficiently analyzed a range of reasonable alternative locations and environmental impacts for a project with the same basic purpose, the Commission should review the previous document. To the extent the circumstances have remained substantially the same with respect to an alternative, the EIR may rely on the previous document to help it assess the feasibility of the potential project alternative. The "No Project" Alternative: The specific alternative of "no project" must be evaluated along with its impacts. The purpose of describing and analyzing the no project alternative is to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project. The no project alternative analysis, therefore, is not the baseline for determining whether the proposed project's environmental impacts may be significant, unless it is identical to the existing environmental setting analysis which does establish that baseline. A discussion of the "no project" alternative should proceed along one of two lines: (a) When the project is the revision of an existing land use or regulatory plan, policy or ongoing operation, the "no project" alternative will be the continuation of the existing plan, policy or operation into the future. Typically, this is a situation where other projects initiated under the existing plan will continue while the new plan is developed. Thus, the projected impacts of the proposed plan or alternative plans would be compared to the impacts that would occur under the existing plan. (b) If the project is other than a land use or regulatory plan, for example a development project on identifiable property, the "no project" alternative is the circumstance under which the project does not proceed. This discussion would compare the environmental effects of the property remaining in its existing state against environmental effects which would occur if the project is approved. If disapproval of the project would result in predictable actions by others, such as the proposal of some other project, this "no project" consequence should be discussed. After defining the no project alternative, the Commission should proceed to analyze the impacts of the no project alternative by projecting what would reasonably be expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project were not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-10 000159 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report and community services. If the "no project" alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, the EIR must also identify another environmentally superior alternative among the remaining alternatives. Remote or Speculative Alternatives: An EIR need not consider an alternative whose effect cannot be reasonably ascertained and whose implementation is remote and speculative. 7.16 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE EXPANSION. An EIR must include an analysis of the environmental effects of future expansion (or other similar future modifications) if there is credible and substantial evidence that: (a) (b) The future expansion or action is a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the initial project; and The future expansion or action is likely to change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects. Absent these two circumstances, future expansion of a project need not be discussed. CEQA does not require speculative discussion of future development which is unspecific or uncertain. However, if future action is not considered now, it must be considered and environmentally evaluated before it is actually implemented. 7.17 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFT EIR. Upon completion of a Draft EIR, Staff shall file a Notice of Completion (Form "H") with the Office of Planning and Research in a printed hard copy or in electronic form on a diskette or by electronic mail transmission. The Commission is encouraged to make copies of filed notices available in electronic format on the Internet. Such electronic postings are in addition to the procedures required by the CEQA Guidelines and the Public Resources Code. The Notice shall contain a brief description of the proposed project, the location of the proposed project, current land use, development type and project issues discussed in the EIR. The Commission shall provide public notice of the completion of a Draft EIR at the same time it sends a Notice of Completion to the Office of Planning and Research. The Notice of Availability of Draft EIR (Form "K") shall specify the period during which comments will be received on the Draft Ell the date, time and place of any .public hearings on the proposed project, a brief description of the project and its location, the significant effects on the environment, if any, anticipated as a result of the project, and the address where copies of the Draft EIR and all documents referenced in the Draft EIR are available for review. Public agencies are encouraged to make copies of filed Notices of Completion available in electronic format on the Internet. Notice shall be given to the last known name and address of all organizations and individuals who have previously requested it. In addition, notice shall be given by at least one of the following procedures: RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-11 • 000160 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report (a) Publication at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed project. If more than one area will be affected, the notice shall be published in the newspaper of largest circulation from among the newspapers of general circulation in those areas. (b) Posting of notice on and off site in the area where the project is to be located. (c) Direct mailing to owners and occupants of property contiguous to the project, as identified on the latest egnali7ed assessment roll. The Notice shall be posted in the office of the Clerk in each county in which the project is located for a period of thirty (30) days. The Clerk must post the Notice within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt. Notice shall be mailed to any person who has filed a written request with the Commission. The Commission may require these requests to be renewed annually and may charge a fee for the reasonable cost of providing this service. A project will not be invalidated due to a failure to send a requested notice provided there has been substantial compliance with these notice provisions. Copies of the Draft EIR shall also be made available at the Commission office for review by members of the general public. Any person obtaining a copy of the Draft EIR shall reimburse the Commission for the actual cost of its reproduction. Copies of the Draft EIR should also be furnished to appropriate public library systems. 7.18 SUBMISSION OF DRAFT EIR TO STATE CLEARINGHOUSE A Draft EIR must be submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review by state agencies in the following situations: (a) The Draft EIR is prepared by a Lead Agency which is a state agency. (b) The Draft EIR is prepared by a public agency where a state agency is a Responsible Agency, Trustee Agency, or otherwise has jurisdiction by law with respect to the project. (c) The Draft EIR is for a project identified in State Guidelines Section 15206 as being of statewide, regional, or areawide significance. State Guidelines Section 15206 identifies the following types of projects as being of statewide, regional, or areawide significance and requiring submission to the State Clearinghouse for circulation: -General plans, elements, or amendments for which an E1R was prepared. •Projects which have the potential for causing significant environmental effects beyond the city or county where the project would be located, such as: •Residential development of more than 500 units. •Commercial projects employing more than 1,000 persons or covering more than 500,000 square feet of floor space. •Office building projects employing more than 1,000 persons or covering more than 250,000 square feet of floor space. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-12 000161 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report •Hotel or motel development of more than 500 rooms. -Industrial projects housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or covering more than 650,000 square feet of floor area. •Projects for the cancellation of a Williamson Act contract covering more than 100 acres. •Projects in one of the following Environmentally Sensitive Areas: •Lake Tahoe Basin. •Santa Monica Mountains Zone. •Sacramento -San Joaquin River Delta. -Suisun Marsh. •Coastal Zone, as defined by the California Coastal Act. •Areas within one -quarter mile of a river designated as wild and scenic. •Areas within the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. •Projects which would affect sensitive wildlife habitats or the habitats of any rare, threatened, or endangered species. •Projects which would interfere with water quality standards. •Projects which would provide housing, jobs, or occupancy for 500 or more people within 10 miles of a nuclear power plant. A Draft EIR may be submitted to the State Clearinghouse where a state agency has special expertise with regard to the environmental impacts involved. Where the Draft EIR will be reviewed through the State review process handled by the State Clearinghouse, use a Notice of Completion (Form "11") as a cover sheet. Fifteen (15) copies of the documents must be sent to the State Clearinghouse for circulation. In addition to the printed copies, a copy of the documents in electronic format shall be submitted on a diskette or by electronic mail transmission if available. 7.19 SPECIAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE AND FUEL BURNING PROJECTS. For any waste burning project, as defined in Guidelines Section 5.10, Notice of Completion shall be given to all organizations and individuals who have previously requested notice. In addition, Notice shall be given by direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property within one-fourth mile of any parcel or parcels on which such a project is located. 7.20 REVIEW OF DRAFT EIR BY OTHER AGENCIES AND PERSONS. Upon the filing and posting of a Notice of Completion, Staffshall consult with and obtain comments from each Responsible Agency, Trustee Agency, and any other public agency having jurisdiction by law over resources which may be affected by the project. Those public agencies having jurisdiction by law over the project shall include, but are not necessarily limited to: RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-13 • 000162 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report • (1) Any city or county bordering the project area; (2) Transportation planning agencies and public agencies with transportation facilities located within the project area; (3) The State Department of Water Resources, when a project is located within one mile of a facility of the State Water Resources Development System. Staffmay also consult with and obtain comments from any person known to have special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved whose comments relative to the Draft EIR would be desirable. Staffmay also consult with any member of the public who has filed a written request for notice with the Commission and any person whom the project applicant believes will be concerned with the environmental effects of the project. 7.21 TIME FOR REVIEW OF DRAFT EIR; FAILURE TO COMMENT. • • A period of between thirty (30) and sixty (60) days from the filing of the Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR shall be allowed for review of and comment on the Draft EIR, except in unusual situations.. If a state agency is a Responsible Agency, or if the Draft EIR is submitted to the State Clearinghouse, the review period shall be at least forty-five (45) days. When a Draft EIR is submitted to the State Clearinghouse for review, the public review period shall be at least as long as the period of review established by the State Clearinghouse. A shorter review period of the Draft EIR by the State Clearinghouse can be requested by the Commission; however, a shortened review period shall not be less than thirty (30) days for a Draft EIR Any request for a shortened review period must be made in writing by the Commission to the Office of Planning and Research. The Commission may designate a person to make these requests. A shortened review period is not available for any proposed project of statewide, regional or areawide environmental significance as determined pursuant to State Guidelines Section 15206. Any approval of a shortened review period shall be given prior to, and reflected in, the public notices. In the event a public agency, group, or person whose comments on a Draft EIR are solicited fails to comment within the required time period, it shall be presumed, absent a written request for a specific extension of time for review and comment, together with the reasons for the request, that such agency, group, or person has no comment to make. Continued planning activities concerning the proposed project, short of formal approval, may continue during the period set aside for review and comment on the Draft EIR RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-14 000163 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report 7.22 PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT EIR. A public hearing on the Draft EIR document is not required but may be held by the decision making body either in separate proceedings or in conjunction with other proceedings of the Commission. The procedures for the manner of conducting the public hearings shall be described at the time the hearing convenes. The Draft EIR should be used as the outline for discussion at the public hearing. If a public hearing is held, it shall be conducted at least fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Notice of Completion, but in no event after the time set for expiration of the comment period. Public notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be posted in a conspicuous location at the Commission office and published in a newspaper of general circulation at least fourteen (14) days in advance of the hearing. The Notice also shall indicate the locations at which the Draft EIR is available for review. To the extent that the Commission maintains an Internet web site, notice of all public hearings should be made available in electronic format on that site. 7.23 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIR. The Commission as Lead Agency shall evaluate any comments on environmental issues received during the public review period for the Draft EIR and shall prepare a written response to those comments. As stated below, the Commission should also consider evaluating and responding to any comments received after the public review period. The response ofthe Commission may take the form of a revision of the Draft EIR, an attachment to the Draft EIR, or some other oral or written response which is adequate under the circumstances of the project. The response must describe the disposition of any significant environmental issues raised in the comment, such as revisions to the proposed project which mitigate anticipated impacts or objections. If the Commission's position is at variance with specific recommendations or suggestions raised in the comment, the Commission's response must detail the reasons why such recommendations or suggestions were not accepted. Moreover, the Commission shall respond to any specific suggestions for project alternatives or mitigation measures for significant impacts, unless such alternatives or mitigation measures are facially infeasible. The response shall contain recommendations, when appropriate, to alter the project as described in the Draft EIR as a result of an analysis of the comments received. At least ten (10) days prior to certifying a Final EIR, the Commission shall provide a written response to any public agency which has made comments on the Draft EIR The Commission is not required to respond to comments received after the public review period. However, the Commission should consider responding to a comments if it will not delay action on the Final EIR, since any comment received before final action on the EIR can form the basis of a legal challenge. A written response which refutes the comment or adequately explains the Commission's action in light of the comment, will assist the Commission in defending against a legal challenge. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-15 • 000164 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report • 7.24 PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF FINAL EIR. Following the receipt of any comments on the Draft EIR as required herein, such comments shall be evaluated by Staff and a Final EIR shall be prepared. The Final EIR shall meet all requirements of Guidelines Sections 7.11 and 7.12 and shall consist of the Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft, a section containing either verbatim or in summary the comments and recommendations received through the review and consultation process, a list ofpersons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the Draft, and a section containing the responses of the Commission to the significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. 7.25 RECIRCULATION WHEN NEW INFORMATION IS ADDED TO EIR. When significant new information is added to the EIR after notice and consultation, but before certification, the Commission shall give Notice of Preparation of the Draft EIR again pursuant to Guidelines Section 7.03 and shall recirculate the Draft EIR for another public review period. The term "information" can include changes in the project or environmental setting as well as additional data or other information. The Commission shall also consult again with those persons contacted pursuant to Guidelines Section 7.17 before certifying the EIR. • • New information is significant only when the EIR is changed in a way that would deprive the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of a project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect, including a feasible project alternative, that the project proponents decline to implement. Recirculation is required, for example, when: (1) new information added to an EIR discloses (a) a new significant environmental impact resulting from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented, (b) a significant increase in the severity of an environmental impact (unless mitigation measures are also adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance), or (c) a feasible project alternative or mitigation measure that clearly would lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project, but which the project proponents decline to adopt; or (2) the Draft EIR is so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR If the revision is limited to a few chapters or portions of the EIR, the Commission as Lead Agency need only recirculate the chapters or portions that have been modified. A decision to not recirculate an EIR must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. Recirculating an EIR can result in the Commission receiving more than one set of comments from reviewers. When the EIR is substantially revised and the entire EIR is recirculated, the Commission may require that reviewers submit new comments and need not respond to those comments received during the RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-16 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report earlier circulation period. The Commission shall advise reviewers, either within the text of the revised EIR or by an attachment to the revised EIR, that although part of the administrative record, the previous comments do not require a written response in the final EIR, and that new comments must be submitted for the revised EIR. The Commission need only respond to those comments submitted in response to the recirculated revised EIR The Commission must send to every agency, person, or organization that commented on the prior draft EIR a notice of the recirculation specifying that new comments must be submitted. When the EIR is revised only in part and the Commission is recirculating only the revised chapters or portions of the EIR, the Commission may request that reviewers limit their comments to the revised chapters or portions. The Commission need only respond to (i) comments received during the initial circulationperiod that relate to chapters or portions of the document that were not revised and recirculated; and (ii) comments received during the recirculation period that relate to the chapters or portions of the earlier EIR that were revised and recirculated. The Commission's request that reviewers limit the scope of their comments shall be included either within the text of the revised EIR or by an attachment to the revised EIR. When recirculating a revised EIR, either in whole or in part, the Commission must, in the revised EIR or by an attachment to the revised EIR, summarize the revisions made to the previously circulated draft EIR 7.26 CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR. Following the preparation of the Final EIR, Staff shall review the Final EIR and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding whether the Final EIR is in order and whether it has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State Guidelines and the Commission's Guidelines. The Final EIR and Staff recommendation shall then be presented to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall independently review and analyze the Final EIR, and determine that the Final EIR reflects its independent judgment The Board of Directors shall certify and find that: (1) the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State Guidelines and the Commission's Guidelines; (2) the Board of Directors has reviewed and analyzed the Final EIR before approving the project; and (3) the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Commission . 7.27 CONSIDERATION OF EIR BEFORE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF PROJECT. The EIR shall be reviewed and considered by the decision making body before it approves or disapproves the proposed project for which the EIR was prepared. The decision making body may then proceed to consider the proposed project for purposes of approval or disapproval. Separately or in conjunction with its action approving or disapproving the project, the decision making body shall certify that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-17 • • • 000166 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report 7.28 FINDINGS. • • The decision making body shall not approve or cany out a project if a completed EIR identifies at least one significant effect of the project unless it makes one or more of the following written findings for each such significant effect, accompanied by a statement of the facts supporting each finding. Findings must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (a) That changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment, and which are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. These mitigation measures must be expressly adopted or rejected in the EIR. There should be a description of the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures. Passing references to mitigation measures in other sections of the EIR, or in a Statement of Overriding Considerations, are not sufficient. (b) That such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the Commission. Such changes have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. (c) That specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the Final EIR. The decision making body must make specific written findings stating why it has rejected an alternative to the project as infeasible. If any of the proposed alternatives could avoid or lessen an adverse impact for which no mitigation measures are proposed, the Commission shall analyze the feasibility of such alternative(s). If the project is to be approved without including such alternative(s), the Commission shall find that specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including considerations for the provision ofemployment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the Final EIR and shall list such considerations before such approval. The decision making body shall not approve or carry out a project as proposed unless (1) the project as approved will not have a significant effect on the environment or (2) its significant environmental effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened (as determined through one or more of the findings indicated above), and any remaining, unavoidable significant effects have been found acceptable because offacts and circumstances described in a Statement of Overriding Considerations. (See Guidelines Section 7.30.) Statements in the Draft EIR or comments on the Draft EIR are not determinative of whether the project will have significant effects. When making the findings required by subdivision (a) of this section, the Commission as Lead Agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which it based its decision. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-18 000167 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report 7.29 SPECIAL FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FACILITIES WHICH MAY EMIT HAZARDOUS AIR EMISSIONS NEAR SCHOOLS. No Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration shall be approved for any project involving the construction or alteration of a facility within one-fourth of a mile of a school which might reasonably be anticipated to emit hazardous or acutely hazardous air emissions as defined below or which would handle acutely hazardous material or a mixture containing acutely hazardous material in a quantity equal to or greater than that specified in Health and Safety Code Section 25536(a), which may impose a health or safety hazard to persons who would attend or would be employed at the school unless both of the following occur (a) The Commission, as Lead Agency, in preparing the Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration has consulted with the school district or districts having jurisdiction over the school regarding the potential impact of the project on the school when circulating the proposed Negative Declaration or Draft EIR for review; and (b) The school district has been given written notification of the project not less than thirty (30) days prior to the proposed approval or certification of the Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. (c) Definitions: (1) "Hazardous air emissions" means any substance released into the air which is on the list prepared pursuant to Section 25532(a) and Section 44321 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) "Acutely hazardous air emissions" means any substance released into the air defined by Section 25532(a) of the Health and Safety Code. 7.30 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. Whenever a project approved by the decision making body will cause unmitigated significant environmental effects, the decision making body must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. A Statement of Overriding Considerations allows the decision making body to approve a project despite one or more unmitigated significant environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR. A Statement of Overriding Considerations can be made only if feasible project alternatives or mitigation measures do not exist to reduce the environmental impact(s) to a level of insignificance and the benefits of the project outweigh the adverse environmental effect(s). The feasibility of project alternatives or mitigation measures is determined by whether the project alternative or mitigation measure can be accomplished within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, legal and technological factors. Project benefits which are appropriate to consider include the economic, environmental, technological and social value of the project. Substantial evidence in the entire record must justify the decision making body's findings and its use of the Statement of Overriding Considerations. If the decision making body makes a Statement of Overriding Considerations, the statement must be included in the record of the project approval and mentioned in the Notice of Determination. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-19 000168 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report • • • • 7.31 MITIGATION REPORTING OR MONITORING PROGRAM FOR EIR. When making the findings required by subdivision (a) of Guidelines Section 7.28, the Commission must do all of the following: (a) adopt a reporting or monitoring program to assure that mitigation measures which are required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment will be implemented by the project proponent or other responsible party in a timely manner, in accordance with conditions of project approval; (b) make sure all conditions and mitigation measures are feasible and fully enforceable through pemit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Such permit conditions, agreements, and measures must be consistent with applicable constitutional requirements such as the "nexus" and "rough proportionality" standards established by the case; and (c) specify the location and the custodian of the documents which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Commission based its decision in the resolution certifying the EIR There is no requirement that the reporting or monitoring program be circulated for public review; however, the Commission may choose to circulate it for public comments along with the Draft EIR. The mitigation measures required to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment must be adopted as conditions of project approval. The adequacy of a mitigation monitoring program is determined by the "rule of reason." This means that a mitigation monitoring program does not need to provide every imaginable measure. It needs only to provide measures that are reasonably feasible. This reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to assure compliance during the implementation or construction of a project. If a Responsible Agency or Trustee Agency has required that certain conditions be incorporated into the project, the Commission may request that agency to prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. The Commission shall also require that prior to the close of the public review period for a Draft EIR (see Guidelines Section 7.21), the Responsible or Trustee Agency submit detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures, or refer the Commission to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to the Commission by a Responsible or Trustee Agency shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are within the Responsible or Trustee Agency's authority. Transportation information resulting from the reporting or monitoring program required to be adopted by the Commission shall be submitted to the regional transportation planning agency where the project is located and to the Department of Transportation for a project of statewide, regional or areawide significance according to State Guidelines section 15006. The transportation planning agency and the Department of Transportation are required by law to adopt guidelines for the submittal of these reporting or monitoring programs, so the Commission may wish to tailor its submittal to such guidelines. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 7-20 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 0001.69. Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report Local agencies have the authority to levy fees sufficient to pay for this program. Therefore, the Commission will charge the project proponent a fee to cover actual costs of program processing and implementation. The Commission may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to an agency or to a private entity which accepts the delegation; however, until mitigation measures have been completed, the Commission remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occurs in accordance with the program. The Commission may choose whether its program will monitor mitigation, report on mitigation, or both. "Reporting"is defined as a written compliance review that is presented to the Council or an authorized staffperson. A report may be required at various stages during project implementation or upon completion of the mitigation measure. Reporting is suited to projects which have readily measurable or quantitative mitigationmeasures or which already involve regular review."Monitoring" is generally an ongoing or periodic process of project oversight. Monitoring is suited to projects with complex mitigation measures which may exceed the expertise of the Commission to oversee, are expected to be implemented over a period of time, or require careful implementation to assure compliance. At its discretion, the Commission may adopt standardized policies and requirements to guide individually adopted programs. Standardized policies or requirements for monitoring and reporting may describe, but are not limited to: (a) The relative responsibilities of various departments within the Commission for various aspects of the program. (b) The responsibilities of the project proponent. (c) Guidelines adopted by the Commission to govern preparation of programs. (d) General standards for determining project compliance with the mitigation measures and related conditions of approval. (e) Enforcement procedures for noncompliance, including provisions for administrative appeal. (f) Process for informing the Council and staff of the relative success of mitigation measures and using those results to improve future mitigation measures. When a project is of statewide, regional, or areawide importance, any transportation information generated by a program must be submitted to the transportation planning agency in the region where the project is located, as well as the Department of Transportation. 7.32 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION. Following consideration and approval of a project for which the Commission is the Lead Agency, the decision making body shall order Staff to prepare, certify and file, a Notice of Determination (Form "F") which shall contain the following: (a) An identification of the project by its common name where possible and its location. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-21 • 000170. Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report (b) (c) (d) (e) (f (g) (h) A brief description of the project. The date when the Commission approved the project. Whether the project in its approved form will have a significant effect on the environment. A statement that an EIR was prepared and certified pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Whether mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. Whether findings and/or a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the project. The address where a copy of the EIR (with comments and responses) and the record of project approval may be examined by the general public. The Notice of Determination shall then be filed, within five working days of the action, with the Clerk of each county in which the project will be located. The Clerk must post the Notice of Determination within twenty-four (24) hours of receipt. The Notice must be posted in the office of the Clerk for a minimum of thirty (30) days. Simultaneously with the filing of the Notice of Determination with the Clerk, Staff shall cause a copy of such Notice to be posted at the Commission office. If the project requires discretionary approval from a state agency, the Notice of Determination shall also be filed with the Office of Planning and Research, within five (5) working days of project approval, along with proof of payment ofthe California Department of Fish and Game fee or Certificate of Fee Exemption (see Guidelines Section 7.35). The filing and posting by the Clerk of the Notice of Determination usually starts a thirty (30) day statute of limitations on court challenges to the approval under CEQA. If a Notice of Determination is not filed, a one hundred eighty (180) day statute of limitations will apply. When a request has been made for a copy of the Notice prior to the date on which the Commission certifies the Final EIR, such Notice must be mailed, first class postage prepaid, within five (5) days of the Commission's determination. If such a request is made following the Commission's determination, then the copy should be mailed in the same manner as soon as possible. 7.33 DISPOSITION OF A FINAL EIR. The Commission shall file a copy of the Final EIR with the appropriate planning agency of any city or county where significant effects on the environment may occur. The Commission shall also retain one or more copies of the Final EIR as a public record for a reasonable period of time. Finally, for private projects, the Commission may require that the project applicant provide a copy of the certified Final EIR to each Responsible Agency. 7.34 PRIVATE PROJECT COSTS. For private projects, the person or entity proposing to carry out the project shall be charged a reasonable fee to recover the estimated costs incurred by the Commission in preparing, circulating, and filing the Draft and Final EIRs, as well as all publication costs incident thereto. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 7-22 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 000171 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report 7.35 FILING FEES FOR PROJECTS WHICH AFFECT WILDLIFE RESOURCES. At the time a Notice of Determination for an EIR is filed with the Clerk, a fee of $850 shall be paid to the Clerk for projects which will adversely affect fish and wildlife resources. These fees are collected by the Clerk on behalf of the California Department of Fish and Game ("DFG"). Only one filing fee is required for each project unless the project is tiered or phased and separate environmental documents are prepared. For projects where a Lead Agency and Responsible Agencies file separate Notices of Determination, only the Lead Agency is required to pay the fee. Note: The Clerk customarily charges a documentary handling fee for each project in addition to the filing fee specified above. Refer to the Index in the Staff Summary to help determine the correct amount. For private projects, the Commission shall pass these costs on to the project applicant. No fees are required for projects with a "de minimis" effect on fish and wildlife resources, or for certain projects undertaken by the DFG and implemented through a contract with a non-profit entity or local government agency. A project with a "de minimis" effect has no potential for adverse effect on fish and wildlife. This is an important exception. DFG considers the following projects as likely to have "de minimis" effects on fish and wildlife, depending on the specific facts of each project: (1) Projects which enhance fish and wildlife and their habitats and result in no accompanying adverse impacts to fish or wildlife; (2) Lot line adjustments; (3) Building teinodeling; (4) Annexations; (5) Redevelopment on existing urban subdivisions with no wildlife habitat; (6) Infill of undeveloped lots; (7) Adoption of a General Plan, where CEQA requires a subsequent discretionary project approval before any physical change to natural habitat is permitted. If the Commission believes that a project will have a "de minimis" effect on wildlife resources, it should file the Certificate of Fee Exemption attached as Form "L". This form requires the Commission to set forth facts in support of the fee exemption. These facts should include: (1) the name and address of the project proponent; (2) a brief description of the project and its location; (3) a statement that an initial study has been prepared by the Commission to evaluate the project's effects on wildlife resources, if any; (4) a declaration that there is no evidence before the Commission that the project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources; and (5) a declaration that the Commission has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in the regulations. A presumption of adverse effect occurs if the project has the potential for adverse effects on the fish and wildlife resources listed on Form "L". To rebut the presumption of adverse effect, the Commission should explain in the declaration why the project would not have an adverse impact on fish and wildlife and RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 7-23 • 000172 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Environmental Impact Report • reference any supporting evidence. These findings should be made at the time of approval of the EIR and attached to Form "L" when submitted to the County. Two copies of Form "L" must be filed with a Notice of Determination in order to obtain the fee exemption. If the Commission believes that a project has been undertaken by the DFG, that the project's costs are payable from one or more of the sources indicated in the Fish and Game Code, and that the project is being implemented through a contract with a non-profit entity or a local govemment agency, the DFG filing does not apply. Since the DFG has not yet adopted regulations to govern this exemption, including a new "Certificate of Fee Exemption," the Commission may wish to use Form L and make appropriate modifications to reflect this exemption. • • RCTC/RVPUB/556438 7-24 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 000173 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Types of EIRS 8. TYPES OF EIRS 8.01 PROJECT EIR The most common type of EIR examines the environmental impacts of a specific development project and focuses primarily on the changes in the environment that would result from the development project. This chapter describes a number of examples of various EIRs tailored to different situations. All EIRs must meet the content requirements summarized in Guidelines Section 7.12. 8.02 SUBSEQUENT EIR A Subsequent EIR is required when a previous EIR has been prepared and certified or a Negative Declaration has been adopted for a project and at least one of the three following situations occur (a) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of a previous EIR due to the identification of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (b) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is to be undertaken which will require major revisions of a previous EIR due to the identification of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (c) New information, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous E1R was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, becomes available and shows any of the following: (1) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in a previous EIR or Negative Declaration, (2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in a previous EIR, (3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible are in fact feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives, or (4) mitigation measures or alternatives which were not considered in a previous EIR would substantially lessen one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. A Subsequent EIR must receive the same circulation and review as the previous EIR received. In instances where the Commission is evaluating a modification or revision to an existing use permit, the Commission may consider only those environmental impacts related to the changes between what was allowed under the old permit and what is requested under the new permit Only if these differential impacts fall within the categories described above may the Commission require additional environmental review. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 8-1 • • 000174 " " " L o c a l G u i d e l i n e s f o r I m p l e m e n t i n g t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( 2 0 0 2 ) T y p e s o f E I R S W h e n t h e C o m m i s s i o n i s c o n s i d e r i n g a p p r o v a l o f a d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t w h i c h i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h a g e n e r a l p l a n f o r w h i c h a n E I R w a s c o m p l e t e d , a n o t h e r E I R i s r e q u i r e d o n l y i f t h e p r o j e c t c a u s e s e n v i r o n m e n t a l e f f e c t s p e c u l i a r t o t h e p a r c e l w h i c h w e r e n o t a d d r e s s e d i n t h e p r i o r E I R , o r w h i c h s u b s t a n t i a l n e w i n f o r m a t i o n s h o w s w i l l b e m o r e s i g n i f i c a n t t h a n d e s c r i b e d i n t h e p r i o r E I R . 8 . 0 3 S U P P L E M E N T T O A N E I R . T h e C o m m i s s i o n a s a L e a d o r R e s p o n s i b l e A g e n c y m a y c h o o s e t o p r e p a r e a S u p p l e m e n t t o a n E I R , r a t h e r t h a n a S u b s e q u e n t E I R , i f a n y o f t h e c o n d i t i o n s d e s c r i b e d i n G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 8 . 0 2 w o u l d r e q u i r e t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a S u b s e q u e n t E I R a n d o n l y m i n o r a d d i t i o n s o r c h a n g e s w o u l d b e n e c e s s a r y t o m a k e t h e p r e v i o u s E I R a d e q u a t e l y a p p l y t o t h e p r o j e c t i n t h e c h a n g e d s i t u a t i o n . T o a s s i s t t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n m a k i n g t h i s d e t e r m i n a t i o n , t h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y s h o u l d r e q u e s t a n I n i t i a l S t u d y a n d / o r a r e c o m m e n d a t i o n b y S t a f f . T h e S u p p l e m e n t t o t h e E I R n e e d c o n t a i n o n l y t h e i n f o r m a t i o n n e c e s s a r y t o m a k e t h e p r e v i o u s E I R a d e q u a t e f o r t h e p r o j e c t a s r e v i s e d . A S u p p l e m e n t t o a n E I R s h a l l b e g i v e n t h e s a m e k i n d o f n o t i c e a n d p u b l i c r e v i e w a s i s g i v e n t o a D r a f t E I R , b u t m a y b e c i r c u l a t e d b y i t s e l f w i t h o u t r e c i r c u l a t i n g t h e p r e v i o u s E I R . W h e n t h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y d e c i d e s w h e t h e r t o a p p r o v e t h e p r o j e c t , i t s h a l l c o n s i d e r t h e p r e v i o u s E I R a s r e v i s e d b y t h e s u p p l e m e n t . F i n d i n g s p u r s u a n t t o G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 7 . 2 8 s h a l l b e m a d e f o r e a c h s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s h o w n i n t h e p r e v i o u s E I R a s s u p p l e m e n t e d . 8 . 0 4 A D D E N D U M T O A N E I R T h e C o m m i s s i o n a s a L e a d o r R e s p o n s i b l e A g e n c y m a y c h o o s e t o p r e p a r e a n A d d e n d u m t o a n E I R , r a t h e r t h a n a S u p p l e m e n t t o a n E I R , o n l y i f n o n e o f t h e c o n d i t i o n s d e s c r i b e d i n G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 8 . 0 2 c a l l i n g f o r p r e p a r a t i o n o f a S u b s e q u e n t E I R h a v e o c c u r r e d a n d m i n o r t e c h n i c a l c h a n g e s o r a d d i t i o n s a r e n e c e s s a r y . S i n c e s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t s o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t w e r e a d d r e s s e d b y f i n d i n g s i n t h e o r i g i n a l E I R , n o n e w f i n d i n g s a r e r e q u i r e d i n t h e a d d e n d u m . A n A d d e n d u m t o a n E I R n e e d n o t b e r e c i r c u l a t e d f o r p u b l i c r e v i e w b u t c a n b e i n c l u d e d i n o r a t t a c h e d t o t h e F i n a l E I R . T h e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g b o d y s h a l l c o n s i d e r t h e a d d e n d u m w i t h t h e F i n a l E I R p r i o r t o m a k i n g a d e c i s i o n o n a p r o j e c t . A b r i e f e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e d e c i s i o n n o t t o p r e p a r e a S u b s e q u e n t E I R s h o u l d b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e a d d e n d u m , t h e E I R f i n d i n g s o r e l s e w h e r e i n t h e r e c o r d . T h i s e x p l a n a t i o n m u s t b e s u p p o r t e d b y s u b s t a n t i a l e v i d e n c e . 8 . 0 5 T I E R E D E I R . ' T i e r i n g " r e f e r s t o u s i n g t h e a n a l y s i s o f g e n e r a l m a t t e r s c o n t a i n e d i n a p r e v i o u s l y c e r t i f i e d b r o a d e r E I R i n l a t e r E I R s o r N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n s p r e p a r e d f o r n a r r o w e r p r o j e c t s . T h e l a t e r E I R o r N e g a t i v e R C T C / R V P U B / 5 5 6 4 3 8 � 2 0 0 2 B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P 8 - 2 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Types of EIRS Declaration may incorporate by reference the general discussions from the broader EIR and may concentrate solely on the issues specific to the later project. An Initial Study shall be prepared for the later project and used to determine whether a Tiered EIR may be used and whether new significant effects should be examined. A Tiered EIR shall be used for later projects where a prior EIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or ordinance and the Commission determines that: (a) The later project is consistent with a program, plan, policy or ordinance for which an EIR has been prepared and certified; (b) The later project is consistent with applicable local land use plans and zoning of the city and county in which the later project would be located; and (c) The later project would not require a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. (See Guidelines Sections 8.02 and 8.03.) Tiering does not excuse the Commission from adequately analyzing reasonable foreseeable significant environmental effects of a project, and does not justify deferring such analysis to a later tier EIR or Negative Declaration. However, the level of detail contained in a first tier EIR need not be greater than that of the program, plan, policy, or ordinance being analyzed. In addition, where the Commission is using the tiering process in connection with an EIR for a large-scale planning approval, such as a general plan or component thereof (e.g., an area plan or community plan), the development of detailed, site -specific information may not be feasible. Such site -specific information can be deferred, in many instances, until such time as the Commission prepares a future environmental document in connection with a project of a more limited geographical scale, as long as deferral does not prevent adequate identification of significant effects of the planning approval at hand. Where a first tier EIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or ordinance consistent with the requirements of this section, the Commission should limit the EIR or Negative Declaration on the later project to effects which: (a). (b) Were not examined as significant effects on the environment in the prior EIR; or Are susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance by the choice of specific revisions in the project by the imposition of conditions or other means. Where the Commission determines that a cumulative effect had been adequately addressed in the prior EIR, that effect is not treated as significant for purposes of the later EIR or Negative Declaration and need not be discussed in detail. When assessing whether there is a new significant cumulative effect, the Commission shall consider whether the incremental effects of the project would be considerable when viewed in the context of past present, and probable future projects. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 8-3 • 06.0176 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Types of EIRS Significant environmental effects have been "adequately addressed" if the Commission determines that they have been mitigated below a level of significance or avoided as a result of the prior EIR and findings were adopted in connection with that prior environmental report. 8.06 STAGED EIR.. Where a large capital project will require a number of discretionary approvals from governmental agencies and one of the approvals will occur more than two years before construction will begin, a Staged EIR may be prepared covering the entire project in a general form or manner. A Staged EIR should evaluate a proposal in light of current and contemplated p ans and produce an informed estimate of the environmental consequences of an entire project. The particular aspect of the project before the Commission for approval shall be discussed with a greater degree of specificity. Where a Staged EIR has been prepared, a Supplement to that EIR shall be prepared when a later approval is required for the project, and the information available at the time of the later approval would permit consideration of additional environmental impacts, mitigation measures, or reasonable alternatives to the project. 8.07 PROGRAM EIR. A Program EIR is an EIR which may be prepared on an integrated series of actions that are related either: (a) Geographically; (b) As logical parts in a chain of contemplated actions; (c) In connection with the issuance of rules, regulations, plans or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a continuing program; or (d) As individual projects carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways. Subsequent activities in the program must be examined in the light of the program EIR to determine whether additional environmental documents must be prepared. Additional environmental review documents must be prepared if the proposed later project may arguably cause significant adverse effects on the environment. 8.08 USE OF A PROGRAM EIR WITH SUBSEQUENT EIRs AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS. A program EIR can be used to simplify the task of preparing environmental documents on later parts of the program. The Program EIR can: RCTC/RVPUB/556438 02002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 8-4 000177 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Types of EIRS (a) Provide the basis in an Initial Study for determining whether the later activity may have any significant effects. (b) Be incorporated by reference to deal with regional influences, secondary effects, cumulative impacts, broad alternatives and other factors that apply to the program as a whole. (c) Focus an EIR on a subsequent project to permit discussion solely of new effects which had not been considered before. 8.09 USE OF AN EIR FROM AN EARLIER PROJECT. A single EIR may be utilized to describe more than one project when the projects involve substantially identical environmental impacts. Any environmental impacts peculiar to one of the projects must be separately set forth and explained. 8.10 MASTER EIR. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) A Master EIR is an EIR which may be prepared for: A general plan (including elements and amendments); A specific plan; A project consisting of smaller individual projects to be phased; A regulation to be implemented by subsequent projects; A project to be carried out pursuant to a development agreement; A project pursuant to or furthering a redevelopment plan; A state highway or mass transit project subject to multiple reviews or approvals; or A regional transportation plan or congestion management plan. A Master EIR must do both of the following: (a) Describe and present sufficient information about anticipated subsequent projects within its scope, including their size, location, intensity, and scheduling; and (b) Preliminarily describe potential impacts of anticipated subsequent projects for which insufficient information is available to support a full impact assessment. The Commission and Responsible Agencies identified in the Master EIR may use the Master EIR to limit environmental review of subsequent projects. However, the subsequent project Lead Agency must prepare an Initial Study to determine whether the subsequent project and its significant environmental effects were included in the Master EIR. If the subsequent project Lead Agency finds that the subsequent project will have no additional significant environmental effect and that nonew mitigation measures or alternatives may be required, it may prepare written findings to that effect without preparing a new environmental document or finding. If the subsequent project Lead Agency cannot make these findings, it must prepare either a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an EIR for the subsequent project. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 8-5 • 0001'78 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Types of EIRS • The Master EIR cannot be used to limit review of a subsequent project if it was certified more than five (5) years before the filing of an application for the subsequent project, or if the approval of a project that was not described in the Master EIR may affect the adequacy of the environmental review in the Master EIR for any subsequent project. However, the five (5) year limitation does not apply if the Commission finds that no substantial changes or information related to the Master EIR exist, or if it certifies a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR that makes appropriate modification to the Master EIR. The Commission as Lead Agency must provide Notice of Completion and availability of a Master EIR within a period of time prior to final adoption by the public agency, as described in Guidelines Section 7.17. The Commission may develop a fee program to fund the costs of a Master EIR. 8.11 FOCUSED EIR. A Focused EIR is an EIR for a subsequent project identified in a Master EIR. It may be used only if the Commission finds that the Master EIR's analysis of cumulative, growth -inducing, and irreversible significant environmental effects is adequate for the subsequent project. The Focused EIR must incorporate by reference the Master EIR. • (a) (b) The Focused EIR must analyze additional significant environmental effects not addressed in the Master EIR and any new mitigation measures or alternatives not included in the Master EIR. "Additional significant effects on the environment" means those project -specific effects on the environment which were not addressed as significant effects on the environment in the Master EIR. The Focused EIR must also examine the following: (a) Significant effects discussed in the Master EIR for which substantial new information exists that shows those effects may be more significant than described in the Master EIR; (b) Those mitigation measures found to be infeasible in the Master EIR for which substantial new information exists that shows those effects may be more significant than described in the Master EIR; and (c) Those mitigation measures found to be infeasible in the Master EIR for which substantial new information exists that shows those measures may now be feasible. The Focused EIR need not examine the following effects: Those that were mitigated through Master EIR mitigation measures; and Those that were examined in the Master EIR in sufficient detail to allow project -specific mitigation or for which mitigation was found to be the responsibility of another agency. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 8-6 000179 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Types of EIRS A Focused EIR may be prepared for a multifamily residential project not exceeding 100 units or a mixed use residential project not exceeding 100,000 square feet even though the project was not identified in a Master EIR, if the following conditions are met: (a) The project is consistent with a general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance for which an EIR was prepared within five (5) years of the Focused EIR's certification; (b) The project does not require the preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR pursuant to Guidelines Sections 8.02 or 8.03; and (c) The parcel is bordered by urban development, previously developed by urban uses, or within one-half mile of a rail transit station. A Focused EIR for these projects should be limited to site -specific significant effects and significant effects that substantial new information shows will be more significant than described in the Master EIR RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 8-7 • • • Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Defmitions 9. DEFINITIONS Whenever the following terms are used in these Guidelines, they shall have the following meaning unless otherwise expressly defined: 9.01 "Applicant" means a person who proposes to carry out a project which requires a lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use, or requires financial aid from one or more public agencies when applying for govemmental approval or assistance. 9.02 "Approval" means a decision by the decision making body or other authorized body or officer of the Commission which commits the Commission to a definite course of action with regard to a particular project. With regard to any project to be undertaken directly by the Commission, approval shall be deemed to occur on the date when the decision making body adopts a motion or resolution determining to proceed with the project, which in no event shall be later than the date of adoption of plans and specifications. As to private projects, approval shall be deemed to have occurred upon the earliest commitment to provide service or the issuance by the Commission of a discretionary contract, subsidy, or other form of fmancial assistance, lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use of the project. The mere acquisition of land by the Commission shall not, in and of itself, be deemed to constitute approval of a project. For purposes of these Guidelines, all environmental documents must be completed as of the time of project approval. 9.03 "Baseline" refers to the pre -project environmental conditions. By comparing the project's potential impacts to the baseline, the lead agency determines whether the project's impacts are substantial enough to be significant under the relevant thresholds of significance. Generally, the baseline is the environmental conditions existing on the date the Notice of Preparation is published for an EIR, or the date of the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration. However, in certain circumstances an earlier or later date may provide a more accurate environmental analysis. An earlier or later date may be used if the environmental documents contain an explanation for the change and substantial evidence supporting the change. 9.04 "CEQA" (the California Environmental Quality Act) means California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. 9.05 "Categorical Exemption" means an exception from the requirement of preparing a Negative Declaration or an EIR, based on a fmding by the Secretary for Resources that the class of projects does not have a significant effect on the environment. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 9-1 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Defmitions 9.06 "Clerk" means either the "Clerk of the Board" or the "County Clerk" depending upon the county. Please refer to the "Index to Environmental Filing by County" in the Staff Summary to determine which applies. 9.07 "Commission" means the Riverside County Transportation Commission. 9.08 "Cumulative Impacts" means two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. The individual effects may be changes resulting from a single project or a number of separate projects, whether past, present or future. The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. 9.09 "Cumulatively Considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual Project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. 9.10 "Decision Making Body" means the body within the Commission ( i.e., Board of Directors) with final approval authority over the particular project. (See Guidelines Section 9.02.) 9.11 "Development Project" means any project undertaken for the purpose of development, including any project involving the issuance of a permit for construction or reconstruction but not a permit to operate. It does not include any ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies. (Government Code Section 65928.) 9.12 "Discretionary Project" means a project for which approval requires the exercise of independent judgment, deliberation, or decision -making on the part of the Commission. 9.13 "Draft EIR" means an EIR containing the information summarized in Guidelines Section 7.12. 9.14 "Emergency" means a sudden, unexpected occurrence, involving a clear and imminent danger, demanding immediate action to prevent or mitigate loss of, or damage to, life, health, property, or essentialpublic services. Emergency includes such occurrences as fire, flood, earthquake, landslide or other natural disaster, as well as such occurrences as riot, war, accident or sabotage. 9.15 "Environment" means the physical conditions which exist in the area which will be affected by a proposed project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 9-2 • 000t 21 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Defmitions 9.16 "EIR" (Environmental Impact Report) means a detailed written statement setting forth the environmental effects and considerations pertaining to a project and may mean either a Draft or a Final version of a typical EIR, a Project EIR, a Subsequent EIR, a Supplemental EIR, a Tiered EIR, a Staged EIR, a Program EIR, a Master EIR, or a Focused EIR. 9.17 "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social and technological factors. 9.18 "Final EIR" means an EIR containing the information contained in the Draft EIR, comments either verbatim or in summary received in the review process, a list of persons commenting, and the response of the Commission to the comments received. 9.19 "Historical Resources" shall be determined according to the following: (a) Resources listed in, or eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources shall be considered historical resources. (b) Resources included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Public Resources Code Sections 5020.1(k), or identified as significant in an historical resource survey, as specified in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(g), are presumed to be historically or culturally significant, unless a preponderance of evidence demonstrates that they are not historically or culturally significant (c) Any ofthe following maybe considered historically significant: any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record or manuscript which a Lead Agency determines, based upon substantial evidence in light of the whole record, to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military or cultural annals of California. (d) Any resource shall be considered by the Lead Agency to be historically significant if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources. (See Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 and 14 California Code of Regulations Section 4852.) (e) The Lead Agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is an historical resource, as defined in Public Resources Code Sections 5020.1(j) or 5024.1, even if it is: (a) not listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources; (b) not included in a local register of historical resources; or (c) not identified in an historical resources survey. 9.20 "Initial Study" means a preliminary analysis conducted by the Commission to determine whether an EIR or a Negative Declaration must be prepared or to identify the significant environmental effects to be analyzed in an EIR. RCfC/RVPUB/556438 9-3 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 000183 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Definitions 9.21 "Jurisdiction by Law" means the authority of any public agency to grant a permit or other entitlement for use, to provide funding for the project in question or to exercise authority over resources which may be affected by the project. The Commission will have jurisdiction by law over a project when the Commission, having primary and exclusive jurisdiction over the area involved, is the site of the project, the area in which the major environmental effects will occur, or the area in which reside those citizens most directly concerned by any such environmental effects. 9.22 "Land Disposal Facility" means a hazardous waste facilitywhere hazardous waste is disposed in, on, or under land. (Health and Safety Code Section 25199.1(d).) 9.23 "Large Treatment Facility" means a treatment facility which treats or recycles one thousand (1,000) or more tons of hazardous waste during any one month of the current reporting period commencing on or after July 1, 1991. (Health and Safety Code Section 25205.1(d).) 9.24 "Lead Agency" means the public agency which has the principal responsibility for preparing environmental documents and for carrying out or approving a project, which may have significant effects on the environment, where more than one public agency is involved with the same underlying activity. 9.25 "MitigatedNegative Declaration" means a Negative Declaration prepared for a Project when the Initial Study has identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect onthe environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. 9.26 "Mitigation" means avoiding the environmental impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action, minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the impacted environment, reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action, or compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. 9.27 "Negative Declaration" means a written statement by the Commission briefly describing the reasons that a proposed project, not exempt from CEQA, will not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, does not require the preparation of an EIR. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 9-4 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP • • 000184 " " " L o c a l G u i d e l i n e s f o r I m p l e m e n t i n g t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( 2 0 0 2 ) D e f i n i t i o n s 9 . 2 8 " N o t i c e o f C o m p l e t i o n " m e a n s a b r i e f r e p o r t f i l e d w i t h t h e O f f i c e o f P l a n n i n g a n d R e s e a r c h b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n w h e n i t i s t h e L e a d A g e n c y a s s o o n a s i t h a s c o m p l e t e d a D r a f t E I R a n d i s p r e p a r e d t o s e n d o u t c o p i e s f o r r e v i e w . 9 . 2 9 " N o t i c e o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n " m e a n s a b r i e f n o t i c e t o b e f i l e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n w h e n i t a p p r o v e s o r d e t e r m i n e s t o c a r r y o u t a p r o j e c t w h i c h i s s u b j e c t t o t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f C E Q A . 9 . 3 0 " N o t i c e o f E x e m p t i o n " m e a n s a b r i e f n o t i c e w h i c h m a y b e f i l e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n w h e n i t h a s a p p r o v e d o r d e t e r m i n e d t o c a r r y o u t a p r o j e c t , a n d i t h a s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e p r o j e c t i s e x e m p t f r o m t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f C E Q A . S u c h a n o t i c e m a y a l s o b e f i l e d b y a n a p p l i c a n t w h e r e s u c h a d e t e r m i n a t i o n h a s b e e n m a d e b y a p u b l i c a g e n c y w h i c h m u s t a p p r o v e t h e p r o j e c t . 9 . 3 1 " N o t i c e o f P r e p a r a t i o n " m e a n s a b r i e f n o t i c e s e n t b y a L e a d A g e n c y t o n o t i f y t h e R e s p o n s i b l e A g e n c i e s a n d T r u s t e e A g e n c i e s t h a t t h e L e a d A g e n c y p l a n s t o p r e p a r e a n E I R f o r a p r o j e c t . T h e p u r p o s e o f t h i s n o t i c e i s t o s o l i c i t g u i d a n c e f r o m s u c h a g e n c i e s a s t o t h e s c o p e a n d c o n t e n t o f t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n t o b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e E I R 9 . 3 2 " O f f s i t e F a c i l i t y " m e a n s a f a c i l i t y t h a t s e r v e s m o r e t h a n o n e g e n e r a t o r o f h a z a r d o u s w a s t e . ( P u b l i c R e s o u r c e s C o d e S e c t i o n 2 1 1 5 1 . 1 ( 1 3 ) ( g ) . ) 9 . 3 3 " P e r s o n " i n c l u d e s a n y p e r s o n , f i r m , a s s o c i a t i o n , o r g a n i z a t i o n , p a r t n e r s h i p , b u s i n e s s , t r u s t , c o r p o r a t i o n , c o m p a n y , c i t y , c o u n t y , c i t y a n d c o u n t y , c i t y , t o w n , t h e s t a t e , a n d a n y o f t h e a g e n c i e s w h i c h m a y b e p o l i t i c a l s u b d i v i s i o n s o f s u c h e n t i t i e s . 9 . 3 4 " P r i v a t e P r o j e c t " m e a n s a p r o j e c t w h i c h w i l l b e c a r r i e d o u t b y a p e r s o n o t h e r t h a n a g o v e m m e n t a l a g e n c y , b u t w h i c h w i l l n e e d a d i s c r e t i o n a r y a p p r o v a l . f r o m t h e C o m m i s s i o n . P r i v a t e p r o j e c t s w i l l n o r m a l l y b e t h o s e l i s t e d i n s u b s e c t i o n s ( b ) a n d ( c ) o f G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 9 . 3 5 . 9 . 3 5 " P r o j e c t " m e a n s t h e w h o l e o f a n a c t i o n o r a c t i v i t y w h i c h m a y c a u s e e i t h e r a d i r e c t p h y s i c a l c h a n g e i n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t , o r a r e a s o n a b l y f o r e s e e a b l e i n d i r e c t c h a n g e i n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t , a n d i s a n y o f t h e f o l l o w i n g : ( a ) A d i s c r e t i o n a r y a c t i v i t y d i r e c t l y u n d e r t a k e n b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o p u b l i c w o r k s c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d r e l a t e d a c t i v i t i e s , c l e a r i n g o r g r a d i n g o f l a n d , o r i m p r o v e m e n t s t o e x i s t i n g p u b l i c s t r u c t u r e s . ( b ) A d i s c r e t i o n a r y a c t i v i t y i n v o l v i n g t h e i s s u a n c e t o a p e r s o n o f a l e a s e , p e r m i t , l i c e n s e , c e r t i f i c a t e , o r o t h e r e n t i t l e m e n t f o r u s e b y o n e o r m o r e p u b l i c a g e n c i e s , o r w h i c h i s s u p p o r t e d , i n w h o l e o r i n p a r t , t h r o u g h c o n t r a c t s , g r a n t s , s u b s i d i e s , l o a n s o r o t h e r f o r m s o f a s s i s t a n c e b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . ( c ) A d i s c r e t i o n a r y p r o j e c t p r o p o s e d t o b e c a r r i e d o u t o r a p p r o v e d b y p u b l i c a g e n c i e s , i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o t h e e n a c t m e n t a n d a m e n d m e n t o f l o c a l G e n e r a l P l a n s o r e l e m e n t s R C T C / R V P U B / 5 5 6 4 3 8 � 2 0 0 2 B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P 9 - 5 0 0 0 1 0 5 . Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Definitions thereof, the enactment of zoning ordinances, the issuance of zoning variances, the issuance of conditional use permits and the approval of tentative subdivision maps. The presence of any real degree of control over the manner in which a project is completed makes it a discretionary project. The term project refers to the activity which is being approved and which may be subject to several discretionary approvals by governmental agencies. The term project does not mean each separate governmental approval. 9.36 "Responsible Agency" means apublic agency which proposes to carry out or approve a project for which a Lead Agency has prepared the environmental documents. For the purposes of CEQA, the term "Responsible Agency" includes all federal, state, regional and local public agencies other than the Lead Agency which have discretionary approval power over the project. 9.37 "Significant Effect" means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the activity including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance. A social or economic change related to a physical change may be considered in determining whether the physical change is significant. 9.38 "Staff" means the Executive Director or his or her designee. 9.39 "Standard" means a standard of general application that is all of the following: (a) A quantitative, qualitative or performance requirement found in a statute, ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, order, or other standard of general application; (b) Adopted for the purpose of environmental protection; (c) Adopted by a public agency through a public review process; (d) Governs the same environmental effect which the change in the environment is impacting; and (e) Governs the jurisdiction where the project is located. The definition of "standard" includes thresholds of significance adopted by the Commission which meet the requirements of this section. If there is a conflict between standards, the Commission shall determine which standard is appropriate based upon substantial evidence in light of the whole record. 9.40 "State Guidelines" means the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act as adopted by the Secretary ofthe California Resources Agency as they now exist or hereafter may be amended. (California Administrative Code, Title 14, Sections 15000, el seq.) RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 9-6 • 000186 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Definitions 9.41 "Substantial Evidence" means reliable information on which a fair argument can be based to support an inference or conclusion, even though another conclusion could be drawn from that information. "Substantial evidence" includes facts, fact -related reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts. "Substantial evidence" does not include argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence which is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence of social or economic impacts which do not contribute to, or are not caused by, physical impacts on the environment. 9.42 "Tiering" means the coverage of general matters in broad scope or Program EIRs, with subsequent narrower environmental documents (such as site -specific EIRs) incorporating by reference the general discussions and concentrating solely on the issues specific to the environmental document subsequently prepared. 9.43 "Transportation Facilities" means major local arterials and public transit within five miles of the project site, and freeways, highways, and rail transit service within ten miles of the project site. 9.44 "Trustee Agency" means a State agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a project which are held in trust for the people of the State of California. Trustee Agencies include but are not limited to: (a) The California Department of Fish and Game with regard to the fish and wildlife of the state. (b) The State Lands Commission with regard to state owned "sovereign" lands. (c) The State Department of Parks and Recreation with regard to units of the State Park System. (d) The University of California with regard to sites within the Natural Land and Water Reserve System. (e) The State Water Resources Control Board with respect to surface waters. 9.45 "Zoning Approval" means any enactment, amendment, or appeal of a zoning ordinance; granting of a conditional use permit or variance; or any other form of land use, subdivision, tract, or development approval required from the city or county having jurisdiction to permit the particular use of the property. RCTC/RVPUB/556438 9-7 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 000187 r ,� Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Forms 10. FORMS RGTC/RVPUB/556438 10-1 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 00018 " L o c a l G u i d e l i n e s f o r I m p l e m e n t i n g t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( 2 0 0 2 ) F o a m s R C T C / R V P U B / 5 5 6 4 3 8 1 0 - 2 � 2 0 0 2 B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P 0 0 0 1 8 9 " " L o c a l G u i d e l i n e s f o r I m p l e m e n t i n g t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( 2 0 0 2 ) T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S P A G E ( S ) 1 . G E N E R A L P R O V I S I O N S , P U R P O S E A N D P O L I C Y 1 - 1 1 . 0 1 G E N E R A L P R O V I S I O N S . 1 - 1 1 . 0 2 P U R P O S E 1 - 1 1 . 0 3 A P P L I C A B I L I T Y . 1 - 2 1 . 0 4 R E D U C I N G D E L A Y A N D P A P E R W O R K . 1 - 2 1 . 0 5 C O M P L I A N C E W I T H S T A T E L A W . 1 - 3 1 . 0 6 T E R M I N O L O G Y . 1 - 3 1 . 0 7 P A R T I A L I N V A L I D I T Y 1 - 4 2 . L E A D A N D R E S P O N S I B L E A G E N C I E S 2 - 1 2 . 0 1 L E A D A G E N C Y P R I N C I P L E . 2 - 1 2 . 0 2 S E T F C T I O N O F L E A D A G E N C Y . 2 - 1 2 . 0 3 D U T I E S O F A L E A D A G E N C Y 2 - 1 2 . 0 4 C O N S U L T A T I O N R E Q U I R E M E N T S F O R D E V E L O P M E N T P R O J E C T S . 2 - 2 2 . 0 5 R E S P O N S I B L E A G E N C Y P R I N C I P L E . 2 - 3 2 . 0 6 D U T I E S O F A R E S P O N S I B L E A G E N C Y 2 - 3 2 . 0 7 R E S P O N S E T O N O T I C E O F P R E P A R A T I O N B Y R E S P O N S I B L E A G E N C I E S 2 - 3 2 . 0 8 U S E O F F I N A L E I R O R N E G A T I V E D E C L A R A T I O N B Y R E S P O N S I B L E A G E N C I E S 2 - 4 2 . 0 9 S H I F T I N L E A D A G E N C Y R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S . 2 - 4 3 . A C T I V I T I E S E X E M P T F R O M C E Q A 3 - 1 3 . 0 1 A C T I O N S S U B J E C T T O C E Q A . 3 - 1 3 . 0 2 M I N I S T E R I A L P R O J E C T S 3 - 1 3 . 0 3 E X E M P T I O N S I N G E N E R A L 3 - 2 3 . 0 4 P R E L I M I N A R Y E X E M P T I O N A S S E S S M E N T . 3 - 2 3 . 0 5 N O T I C E O F E X E M P T I O N 3 - 2 3 . 0 6 D I S A P P R O V E D P R O J E C T S . 3 - 3 3 . 0 7 N o P O S S I B I L I T Y O F S I G N I F I C A N T E F F E C T 3 - 3 3 . 0 8 E M E R G E N C Y P R O J E C T S 3 - 3 3 . 0 9 F E A S I B I L I T Y A N D P L A N N I N G S T U D I E S . 3 - 3 3 . 1 0 R A T E S , T o u . , F A R E S A N D C H A R G E S 3 - 4 3 . 1 1 S U B S U R F A C E P I P E L I N E S W I T H I N A P U B L I C R I G H T - O F - W A Y . 3 - 4 3 . 1 2 A F F O R D A B L E H O U S I N G P R O J E C T S U P T O 1 0 0 U N I T S . 3 - 4 3 . 1 3 M I N O R A L T E R A T I O N S T O F L U O R I D A T E W A L E R U T I L I T I E S . 3 - 4 3 . 1 4 B A L L O T M E A S U R E S 3 - 4 3 . 1 5 O T H E R S P E C I F I C E X E M P T I O N S 3 - 5 R C T C / R V P U B / 5 5 6 4 3 8 � 2 0 0 2 B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P - 1 - 0 0 0 1 0 0 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Table of Contents 3.16 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS. 3-5 4. TIME LIMITATIONS 4-1 4.01 REVIEW OF PRIVATE PROJECT APPLICATIONS. 4-1 4.02 DETERMINATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4-1 4.03 COMPLETION AND ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4-1 4.04 COMPLETION AND CERT'IF'ICATION OF FINAL EIR 4-1 4.05 PROJECTS SUBJECT TO THE PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT 4-2 4.06 PROJECTS, OTHER THAN THOSE SUBJECT TO THE PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT, WITH SHORT TIME PERIODS FOR APPROVAL. 4-2 4.07 SUSPENSION OF TIME PERIODS 4-3 5. I ITIAL STUDY 5-1 5.01 PREPARATION OF INITIAL STUDY. 5-1 5.02 INFORMAL CONSULTATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES. 5-1 5.03 CONSULTATION WITH PRIVATE PROJECT APPLICANT. 5-2 5.04 SCOPING MEETINGS. 5-2 5.05 PURPOSES OF INITIAL STUDY 5-2 5.06 CONTENTS OF INrnAL STUDY. 5-3 5.07 USE OF A CHECKLIST INITIAL, STUDY 5-3 5.08 EVALUATING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS. 5-4 5.09 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT 5-4 5.10 MANDATORY PREPARATION OF AN EIR FOR WASTE BURNING PROJECTS 5-5 5.11 EVALUATING IMPACTS ON HISTORICAL RESOURCES. 5-7 5.12 EVALUATING IMPACTS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL Sins 5-7 5.13 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. 5-8 5.14 FINALDETERMINATION. .. 5-9 6. NEGATIVE DECLARATION .. 6-1 6.01 DECISION TO PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION. 6-1 6.02 DECISION TO PREPARE A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. 6-1 6.03 CONTRACTING FOR PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6-1 6.04 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. 6-1 6.05 POSTING AND PUBLICATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6-2 6.06 SUBMISSION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGA I'El) NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO STATE CLEARINGHOUSE. 6-3 6.07 SPECIAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE AND FUEL BURNING PROJECTS. 6-5 6.08 CONTENT OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6-5 RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP -ll- • • • 000191 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Table of Contents 6.09 ADOPTION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. 6-5 6.10 MITIGATION REPORTING OR MONITORING PROGRAM FOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. C-6 6.11 APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF PROJECT. 6-7 6.12 RECIRCULATION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. f-7 6.13 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ON A PROJECT FOR WHICH A PROPOSED NEGATIVE OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN APPROVED. 6-8 6.14 ADDENDUM TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION. 6-9 6.15 SUBSEQUENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION 6-9 6.16 PRIVATE PROJECT COSTS. 6-10 6.17 FILING FEES FOR PROJECTS WHICH AFFECT WILDLIFE RESOURCES 6-10 7. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 7-1 7.01 DECISION TO PREPARE AN EIR 7-1 7.02 CONTRACTING FOR PREPARATION OF EIRs. 7-1 7.03 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR 7-1 7.04 PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR 7-2 7.05 CONSULTATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND PERSONS. 7-2 7.06 EARLY CONSULTATION ON PROJECTS INVOLVING PERMIT ISSUANCE. 7-3 7.07 AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN. 7-3 7.08 GENERAL ASPECTS OF AN EIR 7-3 7.09 USE OF REGISTERED CONSULTANTS IN PREPARING EIRs. 7-4 7.10 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. 7-4 7.11 STANDARDS FOR ADEQUACY OF AN EIR 7-5 7.12 FORM AND CONTENT OF EIR 7-5 7.13 ANALYSIS OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 7-6 7.14 ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION MEASURES. 7-7 7.15 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES IN AN EIR. 7-9 7.16 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE EXPANSION. 17-1 7.17 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFT EIR. 17-1 7.18 SUBMISSION OF DRAFT EIR TO STATE CLEARINGHOUSE. 7-12 7.19 SPECIAL NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE AND FUEL BURNING PROJECTS. 7-13 7.20 REVIEW OF DRAFT EIRBY OTHER AGENCIES AND PERSONS. 7-13 7.21 TIME FOR REVIEW OF DRAFT EIR; FAILURE TO COMMENT 7-14 7.22 PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT EIR. 7-15 7.23 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIR 7-15 7.24 PREPARATION AND CONTENTS OF FINAL hill 7-16 RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP 000192 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Table of Contents 7.25 RECIRCULATION WHEN NEW INFORMATION IS ADDED TO EIR 7-16 7.26 CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR 7-17 7.27 CONSIDERATION OF EIR BEFORE APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF PROJECT. , 7-17 7.28 FINDINGS. 7-18 7.29 SPECIAL FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR FACILITIES WHICH MAY EMIT HAZARDOUS AIR EMISSIONS NEAR SCHOOLS 7-19 7.30 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 7-19 7.31 MITIGATION REPORTING OR MONITORING PROGRAM FOR EIR. 7-20 7.32 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION. 7-21 7.33 DISPOSITION OF A FINAL EIR 7-22 7.34 PRIVATE PROJECT COSTS. 7-22 7.35 FILING FMS FOR PROJECTS WHICH AFFECT WILDLIFE RESOURCES 7-23 8. TYPES OF EIRS 8-1 8.01 PROJECT EIR 8-1 8.02 SUBSEQUENT EIR. 8-1 8.03 SUPPLEMENT TO AN EIR. 8-2 8.04 ADDENDUM TO AN EIR 8-2 8.05 TIERED EIR 8-2 8.06 STAGED EIR 8-4 8.07 PROGRAM EIR. 8-4 8.08 USE OF A PROGRAM EIR WITH SUBSEQUENT EIRs AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS. 8-4 8.09 USE OF AN EIR FROM AN EARLIER PROJECT 8-5 8.10 MAS 1ER EIR. 8-5 8.11 FOCUSED EIR. 8-6 9. DEFINITIONS 9-1 9.01 "Applicant" 9-1 9.02 "Approval" 9-1 9.03 "Baseline" 9-1 9.04 "CEQA" 9-1 9.05 "Categorical Exemption" 9-1 9.06 "Clerk" 9-1 9.07 "Commission" 9-2 9.08 "Cumulative Impacts" 9-2 9.09 "Cumulatively Considerable" 9-2 9.10 "Decision Making Body" 9-2 9.11 "Development Project" 9-2 RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP -iv- 000lsa Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2002) Table of Contents 9.12 "Discretionary Project" 9-2 9.13 "Draft EIR" 9-2 9.14 "Emergency" 9-2 9.15 "Environment" 9-2 9.16 HEIR" 9-2 9.17 "Feasible" 9-3 9.18 "Final EIR" 9-3 9.19 "Historical Resources" 9-3 9.20 "Initial Study" 9-3 9.21 "Jurisdiction by Law" 9-3 9.22 "Land Disposal Facility" 9-4 9.23 "Large Treatment Facility" 9-4 9.24 "Lead Agency" 9-4 9.25 "Mitigated Negative Declaration" 9-4 9.26 "Mitigation" 9-4 9.27 "Negative Declaration" 9-4 9.28 "Notice of Completion" 9-4 9.29 "Notice of Determination" 9-5 9.30 "Notice of Exemption" 9-5 9.31 "Notice of Preparation" 9-5 9.32 "Offsite Facility" 9-5 9.33 "Person" 9-5 9.34 "Private Project" 9-5 9.35 "Project" 9-5 9.36 "Responsible Agency" 9-6 9.37 "Significant Effect" 9-6 9.38 "Staff" 9-6 9.39 "Standard" 9-6 9.40 "State Guidelines" 9-6 9.41 "Substantial Evidence" 9-7 9.42 'Tiering" 9-7 9.43 "Transportation Facilities" 9-7 9.44 "Trustee Agency" 9-7 9.45 "Zoning Approval" 9-7 10. FORMS 10-1 RCTC/RVPUB/556438 ©2002 Best Best & Krieger LLP -v- 000194 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 G " " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : T a n y a L o v e , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ' s R e q u e s t t o A m e n d F Y 0 3 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n a n d A l l o c a t e F u n d s f o r M a r k e t i n g o f t h e B u s R a p i d T r a n s i t P r o g r a m a n d t h e P u r c h a s e o f R e a l P r o p e r t y S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A m e n d R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ' s F Y 0 3 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n ; a n d , 2 ) A l l o c a t e $ 2 , 0 5 7 , 9 2 5 i n L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d s f o r t h e P u r c h a s e o f R e a l P r o p e r t y ( $ 1 , 0 6 2 , 0 0 0 ) a n d M a r k e t i n g o f t h e B u s R a p i d T r a n s i t P r o g r a m ( $ 9 9 5 , 9 2 5 ) . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : O n J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 0 2 , t h e R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y ' s ( R T A ) B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s a p p r o v e d t h e a c q u i s i t i o n o f 4 . 5 7 a c r e s o f r e a l p r o p e r t y w h i c h i s a d j a c e n t t o R T A ' s e x i s t i n g s i t e a t 1 9 7 5 T h i r d S t r e e t , R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r ' s i n i t i a l a s k i n g p r i c e f o r t h e s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y w a s $ 1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 . T h e c o s t o f t h e p r o p e r t y h a s b e e n a p p r a i s e d a t a f a i r m a r k e t r a n g e o f $ 7 1 7 , 0 0 0 t o $ 9 9 6 , 0 0 0 . G i v e n t h e l o c a t i o n o f t h e p r o p e r t y a n d t h e n e e d f o r R T A t o e x p a n d i t s o p e r a t i o n , R T A ' s B o a r d a p p r o v e d a t o t a l b u d g e t o f $ 1 , 0 6 2 , 0 0 0 f o r a c q u i s i t i o n o f t h e l a n d . A d d i t i o n a l l y , R T A h a s b e e n w o r k i n g c l o s e l y w i t h s t a f f f r o m t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a , B e r k e l e y ( U C ) t o a n a l y z e t h e p o t e n t i a l o f a B u s R a p i d T r a n s i t ( B R T ) p i l o t p r o g r a m . A s p a r t o f t h i s a n a l y s i s , R T A h a s d e t e r m i n e d t h e n e e d t o b e g i n e d u c a t i n g t h e e l e c t e d o f f i c i a l s , c o m m u n i t y l e a d e r s , s t a k e h o l d e r s a n d p u b l i c a b o u t t h e a n t i c i p a t e d B R T p i l o t p r o g r a m t h r o u g h a t w o - y e a r s t r a t e g i c m a r k e t i n g p l a n . T h e p l a n w i l l i n v o l v e s e l e c t e d a r e a s w i t h i n t h e C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e ; s p e c i f i c a r e a s w i l l b e d e t e r m i n e d u s i n g d a t a f r o m t h e U C B s t u d y . T h e g o a l o f t h e s t r a t e g i c p l a n i s t o f o c u s o n d e v e l o p i n g , i n c r e a s i n g a n d m a i n t a i n i n g r i d e r s h i p f o r R T A ' s p u b l i c t r a n s i t s y s t e m . T w o c h a l l e n g e s w i l l b e s p e c i f i c a l l y a d d r e s s e d b y t h e p l a n : I t e m 7 G 0 0 0 1 9 5 1) Over -coming the typical commuter's reluctance to abandon their cars; and, 2) Redefining the stereotype of public transit being an unattractive and inconvenient commuting option. To assist with the analysis of the BRT program, RTA's Board approved a marketing contract in an amount not to exceed $995,925 to O'Reilly Public Relations. Marketing of the BRT is proposed to be done in the following stages: Stage Description Cost 1 Marketing Research $ 82,350 2 Government Briefings $ 41,900 3 Passenger Incentives Program $ 27,375 4 Recruitment Program $ 40,250E 5 Marketing/Advertising $ 616,375 6 Media Relations $ 127,475 7 Coordination with On -going Study $ 60,200 Total Cost (Not to Exceed) $ 995,925 Attachment 1 provides a detailed breakdown of proposed marketing activities. Based on the outcome of Stage 1 - Marketing Research, Stages 2 through 7 may be implemented. Staff is recommending allocation of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) in an amount not to exceed $2,057,925 for the purchase of real property ($1,062,000) and marketing of the Bus Rapid Transit Program ($995,925). If approved, funds would be provided from RTA's allocated but unclaimed LTF fund balance. Due to the timing of RTA's Board approval (June 27, 2002), this request was not reviewed by RCTC's Plans and Programs Committee which met on June 24, 2002. Since the purchase of the real property is time sensitive, staff felt it necessary to bring this item directly to the full Commission for its consideration. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: Amount: Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds Budget Adjustment: No — funds are administered by the County of Riverside GLA No.: . Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/27/02 Attachment: RTA - Bus Rapid Transit System - FY 02-04 • Item 7G 000 OS RTA - B us Rap••Tra nsit Syst em 2002-2004 Descripti on Research Internal Counselor President Counselor Dir ect or Counselor Dire ctor Account Su. ervis or Acc ount . Executive Account .. Executive Staff Assist ant Total u'_rleuf9 fl 'Total Fees ' ''� Direct - i=x.- , = r O a _ r, _.f,t� - Meet with RTA - project members - Messaging 20 10 10 20 60 $11,300 $1,000 $12,300 session - Compile book 10 10 10 20 50 8,800 1,000 9,800 messaging External 5 20 20 15 60 6,060 2600 11,550 - Public Opinion Survey - Focus Groups 5 20 30 10 65 9,950 24,950 - Industry 5 20 40 50 10 19,75015,000 500 2 research 5 10 40 55 55 3,500 0 0 3,,5050 5 235 rirr 0 '(!70§ 9,800 Government Briefings - Develop ma terials - Conduct briefings /follow-uc 5 30 30 30 95 9,800 0 75 85 10 10 180 32,100 0 32.100 Pass enger Izentives Proararn Identify - / secure pa rnterships with vendors 20 26 60 60 80 245 27,375 TBD 245 375 .: 27,375 `^ 40,,YiNft Recru itment Progra m 2 1 r. i - Develop 9,750 solicitation packet - Iden tify / Brie f 10 20 30 30 90 9,650 100 community leaden - Fonn Community Advisory 30 20 50 20 120 18,900 0 18,900 Co mmittee 10 30 40 20 100 11,600 0 (CAC) 81 r ', r'15o , .` i , !rag . 11,600 23,450 29,200 Marketin g / Advertisinc -Brochure(1) - Quarterly Newsletter 10 40 50 30 10 140 19,950 3,500 (8) - Web Site 10 20 30 140 200 24,200 5,000 - Logo Slo gan 10 10 15 40 25 100 14,975 0 14,975 and 1) - 1-800 Informa tion Line 5 20 30 10 65 9,950 3,000 12,950 • Billboards (3) $ 5 700 0 • 700 -TV Commercials 5 5 15 40 65 8,225 328,000 338,225 (6) - Movie Trailers 5 5 30 100 140 16,325 70,000 86,325 (3) - Direct Mail 5 5 5 20 30 10 75 9,250 10,000 19,250 (roughly 170,000 ho use holds - Radio PSAs 10 30 30 15 _ 85 13,450 60,000 73,450 (3) -Speakers Bureau 5 10 15 30 4,150 0 4,150 5 20 40 40 30 135 15.700 0 15,700 F1"! r 3 75 T 47. 5 1 �""" Media Re lation s - Media Ma tedalstnews releases eta) - Media Briefings 20 20 20 60 90 30 240 30,750 10,000 40,750 Media IGt 20 20 40 10 5 75 15,325 0 15,325 18,075 - - Opinion -Editorials 5 5 40 40 30 30 145 16,075 2,000 - New s Burea u / Media 20 30 50 80 14,200 0 14,200 monitoring • Editorial Boa rd Meetings 15 30 70 175 275 22,825 1,000 23,825 30 15 5 30 50 15,200 100 15,300 r» : •5 ".":i X3%5 :' "°.. 13 r1 Coo rdination With Ongoing Study Internal - team etrate r. meetin, a 120 180 50 . 350 59D . x 60,200 _ $483 5 0 "' $5 2,700 i" "$1 . 1 1 1 Hours To tal 495 120 325 1130 330 670 , Ra te (per ho ur) $250 $175 $175 $140 $100 $100 520 $45 •5 TOTAL AMO UNT 5123. 760 621.non sarsc7s e�cnenn oa,... . .... ......... . --- --- ..- zv.r.�, .,•_-:-v,...., 000_iU7 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 H " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : P l a n s a n d P r o g r a m s C o m m i t t e e T a n y a L o v e , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : R e s o l u t i o n N o . 0 3 - 0 0 1 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n t o A l l o c a t e S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d s " a n d F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 3 S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e A l l o c a t i o n s P L A N S A N D P R O G R A M S C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A d o p t R e s o l u t i o n N o . 0 3 - 0 0 1 , " R e s o l u t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n t o A l l o c a t e S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d s " ; a n d , 2 ) A p p r o v e t h e F Y 0 3 S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d a l l o c a t i o n s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a s p r e s e n t e d o n t h e a t t a c h e d t a b l e . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n o r d e r f o r t h e p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s t o c l a i m S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e ( S T A ) f u n d s f o r o p e r a t i n g a n d c a p i t a l p u r p o s e s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n m u s t a l l o c a t e f u n d s t o s u p p o r t t h e t r a n s i t s e r v i c e s a n d c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s c o n t a i n e d i n t h e a p p r o v e d F Y 0 3 - 0 5 S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n ( S R T P ) i d e n t i f i e d f o r f u n d i n g w i t h S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e f u n d s . T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y S R T P s w e r e a p p r o v e d a t t h e J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g . A c c o r d i n g t o t h e S t a t e C o n t r o l l e r ' s O f f i c e , t h e a m o u n t o f S T A f u n d s t h a t a r e e x p e c t e d t o b e r e c e i v e d i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y f o r F Y 0 2 - 0 3 i s $ 2 , 9 0 6 , 5 6 5 ( $ 2 , 6 6 3 , 9 8 7 d i s c r e t i o n a r y p o t a n d $ 2 4 2 , 5 7 8 f o r s p e c i f i c o p e r a t o r s ) . T h e a t t a c h e d t a b l e o u t l i n e s t h e s p e c i f i c o p e r a t o r s ' a l l o c a t i o n s t h a t n e e d t o b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . T h e f u n d i n g a m o u n t f o r R C T C ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m h a s b e e n i n c r e a s e d t o $ 3 3 9 . 8 5 8 . T h e r e q u e s t e d a p p r o v e d b y t h e P l a n s a n d P r o g r a m s C o m m i t t e e d i d n o t r e f l e c t f u n d i n g r e q u i r e d f o r t h e S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h L i n e o r t h e V a n B u r e n T i e r I I S t a t i o n . T h e C o m m u t e r R a i l P r o g r a m h a s I t e m 7 H 0 0 0 1 9 8 adequate revenue to cover the increased expenditures. The State allocated non - discretionary funds will be used first with the balance derived from the discretionary allocation. The FY 03 STA allocations are consistent with the approved SRTPs and the funds allocated are explicitly for the projects as stated in the approved plans. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 03-001 2) STA FY 03 Allocations 000199 a .� .r Item 7H • • " " " R E S O L U T I O N N O . 0 3 - 0 0 1 " R E S O L U T I O N O F T H E R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N T O A L L O C A T E S T A T E T R A N S I T A S S I S T A N C E F U N D S " W H E R E A S , t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n i s d e s i g n a t e d t h e r e g i o n a l e n t i t y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e a l l o c a t i o n o f S t a t e T r a n s i t A s s i s t a n c e F u n d s w i t h i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n h a s e x a m i n e d t h e S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ; a n d W H E R E A S , a l l p r o p o s e d e x p e n d i t u r e s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a r e i n c o n f o r m i t y w i t h t h e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e l e v e l o f p a s s e n g e r f a r e s i s s u f f i c i e n t f o r c l a i m a n t s t o m e e t t h e f a r e r e v e n u e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s C o d e S e c t i o n s 9 9 2 6 8 . 2 , 9 9 2 6 8 . 3 , 9 9 2 6 8 . 4 , 9 9 2 6 8 . 5 , a n d 9 9 2 6 8 . 9 , a s a p p l i c a b l e ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e c l a i m a n t i s m a k i n g f u l l u s e o f f e d e r a l f u n d s a v a i l a b l e u n d e r t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A c t ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e s u m o f t h e c l a i m a n t ' s a l l o c a t i o n s f r o m t h e s t a t e t r a n s i t a s s i s t a n c e f u n d a n d f r o m t h e l o c a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f u n d d o e s n o t e x c e e d t h e a m o u n t t h e c l a i m a n t i s e l i g i b l e t o r e c e i v e d u r i n g t h e f i s c a l y e a r ; a n d W H E R E A S , p r i o r i t y c o n s i d e r a t i o n h a s b e e n g i v e n t o c l a i m s t o o f f s e t r e d u c t i o n s i n f e d e r a l o p e r a t i n g a s s i s t a n c e a n d t h e u n a n t i c i p a t e d i n c r e a s e i n t h e c o s t o f f u e l , t o e n h a n c e e x i s t i n g p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s e r v i c e s , a n d t o m e e t h i g h p r i o r i t y r e g i o n a l , c o u n t y w i d e , o r a r e a - w i d e p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n n e e d s ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e p u b l i c t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s h a v e m a d e a r e a s o n a b l e e f f o r t t o i m p l e m e n t t h e p r o d u c t i v i t y i m p r o v e m e n t s r e c o m m e n d e d p u r s u a n t t o P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s C o d e S e c t i o n 9 9 2 4 4 ; a n d W H E R E A S , t h e c l a i m a n t i s n o t p r e c l u d e d b y a n y c o n t r a c t e n t e r e d i n t o o n o r a f t e r J u n e 2 8 , 1 9 7 9 , f r o m e m p l o y i n g p a r t - t i m e d r i v e r s o r c o n t r a c t i n g w i t h c o m m o n c a r r i e r s o r p e r s o n s o p e r a t i n g u n d e r a f r a n c h i s e o r l i c e n s e . W H E R E A S , o p e r a t o r s a r e i n f u l l c o m p l i a n c e w i t h S e c t i o n 1 8 0 8 1 . 1 o f t h e V e h i c l e C o d e , a s r e q u i r e d i n P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s C o d e S e c t i o n 9 9 2 5 1 . , 0 0 9 0 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 02-03 as detailed on the attached table. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. Approved and adopted this 10t' day of July, 2002. John F. Tavaglione, Chairperson Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission • • • " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N F Y 0 2 - 0 3 S T A T E T R A N S I T A S S I S T A N C E F U N D S A L L O C A T I O N S F O R T R A N S I T C u r r e n t Y e a r A l l o c a t i o n s R e q u e s t s p e r S R T P s B e a u m o n t C o r o n a R i v e r s i d e S p e c i a l S e r v i c e s R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y R C T C ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l T o t a l W e s t e r n C o u n t y : S u n L i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y T o t a l C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y : P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y T o t a l P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y : T O T A L F Y 0 3 F U N D I N G W e s t e m C o u n t y B u s R a i l $ 9 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 9 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 6 5 7 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 7 6 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 5 1 0 , 2 0 0 $ 3 3 9 , 8 5 8 $ 3 3 9 , 8 5 8 C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y $ 6 5 1 , 0 0 0 $ 6 5 1 , 0 0 0 P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y 1 $ 9 8 , 2 0 0 2 $ 9 8 , 2 0 0 1 : S u n L i n e : $ 5 6 3 , 9 6 6 ( d i s c r e t i o n a r y ) + $ 8 1 , 4 1 4 ( o p e r a t o r s p e c i f i c ) = $ 6 4 5 , 3 8 0 . R e q u e s t i n g $ 6 5 1 , 0 0 0 - d i f f e r e n c e o f $ 5 , 6 2 0 w i l l c o m e f r o m p r i o r y e a r u n c l a i m e d a l l o c a t i o n . ( $ 6 5 1 , 0 0 0 - $ 6 4 5 , 3 8 0 = $ 5 , 6 2 0 ) 2 : P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y : $ 4 5 , 0 2 1 ( d i s c r e t i o n a r y ) + $ 1 , 3 8 0 ( o p e r a t o r s p e c i f i c ) = $ 4 6 , 4 0 1 . R e q u e s t i n g $ 9 8 , 2 0 0 d i f f e r e n c e o f $ 5 1 , 7 9 9 w i l l c o m e f r o m p r i o r y e a r u n c l a i m e d a l l o c a t i o n . ( $ 9 8 , 2 0 0 - $ 4 6 , 4 0 1 = $ 5 1 , 7 9 9 ) 0 0 0 2 0 . 2 6 / 2 7 / 2 0 0 2 1 : 0 7 P M F Y 0 3 S T A A l l o c a t i o n s RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2003 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Transit PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 03 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for transit as shown on the attached table. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In order for the public transit operators to claim Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for operating and capital purposes, the Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the approved FY 03- 05 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTP). The Riverside County SRTPs were approved at the June 12, 2002 Commission meeting. At that same meeting, the estimated FY 02-03 LTF funds were revised and apportioned as follows: Area Population Population % FY 02-03 Revised Apportionment Western Riverside $26,913,210 — bus $ 6,728,303 — rail 1,240,834 77.14% $33,641,513 Coachella Valley 340,576 21.17% $ 9,233,702 Palo Verde Valley 27,160. 1.69% $ 736,362 TOTAL: 1,608,570 100.00% $43,611,578 In addition to the above funds, any apportioned but unclaimed funds in the Western County, Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley areas will also be available for transit services. Attachment 1 outlines the specific operators' allocations which need to be approved by the Commission. The funding amount for RCTC's Commuter Rail Program has been increased to $5,250,440. The request approved by the Plans Item 71 000203 and Programs Committee did not reflect funding required for the North Main Tier II station. The Commuter Rail Program has adequate revenue to cover the increased expenditures. Any modifications in fare box revenues, federal grants, Measure "A" funding, or carry-over funds may require operator(s) to revise their services to operate within the LTF funding limitations. Attachment: FY 03 LTF Allocations • • Item 71 000204 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N F Y 0 2 / 0 3 L O C A L T R A N S P O R T A T I O N F U N D A L L O C A T I O N S F O R T R A N S I T E S T I M A T E D O P E R A T I N G C O S T S ( L T F F u n d s ) E S T I M A T E D C A P I T A L C O S T S ( L T F F u n d s ) E S T I M A T E D T O T A L C O S T S ( e x c l u d e s f a r e b o x ) E S T I M A T E D L T F C A R R Y O V E R F U N D S E S T I M A T E D N O N L T F R E V E N U E S ( F a r e b o x ) R E C O M M E N D E D L T F T R A N S I T A L L O C A T I O N S $ 1 , 3 3 3 , 0 6 1 $ 8 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 3 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 6 3 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 , 3 7 3 , 3 3 0 $ 2 8 , 5 1 1 , 3 9 1 B a n n i n g B e a u m o n t C o r o n a R i v e r s i d e S p e c i a l S e r v i c e s R i v e r s i d e T r a n s i t A g e n c y $ 7 4 0 , 5 6 1 $ 7 7 4 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 1 2 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 6 3 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 , 9 9 8 , 3 3 0 $ 5 9 2 , 5 0 0 $ 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 8 5 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 3 3 3 , 0 6 1 $ 8 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 3 6 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 6 3 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 4 , 8 5 0 , 3 3 0 $ 0 $ 1 4 3 , 5 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 , 4 7 7 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 6 , 8 0 8 $ 8 6 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 7 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 6 7 4 , 9 8 3 1 2 W E S T E R N R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T O T A L ( B u s ) $ 2 8 , 2 7 3 , 8 9 1 $ 1 , 7 1 4 , 5 0 0 $ 2 9 , 9 8 8 , 3 9 1 $ 1 , 6 2 0 , 5 0 0 $ 6 , 1 7 7 , 7 9 1 R C T C ' s C o m m u t e r R a i l ( M e t r o l i n k ) $ 4 , 4 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 5 , 4 4 0 $ 5 , 2 5 0 , 4 4 0 $ 0 $ 3 , 1 0 6 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 2 5 0 , 4 4 0 R C T C ' s C O M M U T E R R A I L T O T A L ( R a i l ) $ 4 , 4 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 5 , 4 4 0 $ 5 , 2 5 0 , 4 4 0 $ 0 $ 3 , 1 0 6 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 2 5 0 , 4 4 0 S u n l i n e T r a n s i t A g e n c y $ 9 , 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 9 , 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 2 , 8 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 9 , 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 C O A C H E L L A V A L L E Y T O T A L $ 9 , 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 9 , 5 3 6 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 2 , 8 5 0 , 0 0 0 P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y T r a n s i t A g e n c y $ 4 3 7 , 3 9 6 $ 0 $ 4 3 7 , 3 9 6 $ 1 1 1 , 7 8 5 $ 6 4 , 0 8 5 3 $ 3 2 5 , 6 1 1 P A L O V E R D E V A L L E Y T R A N S I T A G E N C Y T O T A L $ 4 3 7 , 3 9 6 $ 0 $ 4 3 7 , 3 9 6 $ 1 1 1 , 7 8 5 $ 6 4 , 0 8 5 $ 3 2 5 , 6 1 1 C O U N T Y T O T A L $ 4 2 , 6 9 2 , 2 8 7 $ 2 , 5 1 9 , 9 4 0 $ 4 5 , 2 1 2 , 2 2 7 $ 1 , 7 3 2 , 2 8 5 $ 1 2 , 1 9 7 , 8 7 6 $ 4 3 , 6 2 3 , 4 4 2 N o t e s : 1 : B e a u m o n t h a s $ 1 4 3 , 5 0 0 i n a l l o c a t e d b u t u n c l a i m e d L T F f u n d s . L T F c l a i m w i l l b e f o r $ 8 1 0 , 0 0 0 ( $ 6 6 6 , 5 0 0 F Y 0 3 f u n d s + $ 1 4 3 , 5 0 0 p r i o r y e a r f u n d s ) 2 : R T A h a s p r o j e c t e d $ 1 , 4 7 7 , 0 0 0 i n c a r r y o v e r f u n d s f r o m F Y 0 2 . F u n d s a r e " o n h a n d " a t R T A . 3 : P a l o V e r d e V a l l e y h a s p r o j e c t e d $ 1 1 1 , 7 8 5 i n c a r r y o v e r f u n d s f r o m F Y 0 2 . F u n d s a r e " o n h a n d " a t P V V T A 0 0 0 2 0 5 7 / 1 / 2 0 0 2 2 : 4 2 P M F Y 0 3 L T F A l l o c a t i o n s AGENDA ITEM 7J • " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : P l a n s a n d P r o g r a m s C o m m i t t e e K a r e n L e l a n d , S t a f f A n a l y s t S t e p h a n i e W i g g i n s , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : N e w C o m m u t e r R a i l S e r v i c e s U p d a t e P L A N S A N D P R O G R A M S C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o r e c e i v e a n d f i l e t h e N e w C o m m u t e r R a i l S e r v i c e s U p d a t e a s a n i n f o r m a t i o n i t e m . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : 9 1 L i n e O n M a y 6 , 2 0 0 2 , t h e 9 1 L i n e b e g a n o p e r a t i n g w i t h t w o m o r n i n g a n d e v e n i n g p e a k h o u r t r a i n s a n d o n e m i d - d a y r o u n d - t r i p t r a i n . T h e L i n e o r i g i n a t e s a t t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n w i t h s t o p s i n L a S i e r r a , W e s t C o r o n a , F u l l e r t o n , N o r w a l k / S a n t a F e S p r i n g s , C o m m e r c e , a n d L o s A n g e l e s U n i o n S t a t i o n . W i t h t h e s t a r t u p o f t h e n e w s e r v i c e , p a s s e n g e r s n o w h a v e t w o o p t i o n s f o r t r a v e l t o L A U S - t h e e x i s t i n g R i v e r s i d e L i n e a n d t h e n e w 9 1 L i n e . A n i n c r e a s e i n n e w p a s s e n g e r s a n d / o r a s h i f t i n g o f e x i s t i n g p a s s e n g e r s ( i . e . , R i v e r s i d e L i n e t o t h e 9 1 L i n e ) i s e x p e c t e d d u r i n g t h e i n i t i a l m o n t h s o f t h e L i n e o p e n i n g . P r e l i m i n a r y d a t a o b t a i n e d f r o m M e t r o l i n k i n d i c a t e s t h a t f r o m M a y 6 J u n e 3 , 2 0 0 2 , d a i l y r i d e r s h i p o n t h e 9 1 L i n e a v e r a g e d 9 6 7 p a s s e n g e r t r i p s . T h i r t y - t w o p e r c e n t ( 3 2 % ) o r 3 1 0 w e r e n e w p a s s e n g e r s , a n d 6 8 % o r 6 5 7 w e r e p a s s e n g e r s w h o h a v e s h i f t e d f r o m t h e R i v e r s i d e , O r a n g e C o u n t y , a n d I n l a n d E m p i r e - O r a n g e C o u n t y ( I E O C ) L i n e s . T o f u r t h e r j u s t i f y t h e s h i f t i n g o f p a s s e n g e r s f r o m t h e R i v e r s i d e L i n e t o t h e 9 1 L i n e , d a t a w a s o b t a i n e d b y s t a t i o n g u a r d s a t t h e P e d l e y M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n c a p t u r i n g d a i l y p a s s e n g e r c o u n t o f p e a k m o r n i n g b o a r d i n g s o n t h e R i v e r s i d e L i n e . B o a r d i n g s f o r A p r i l a n d M a y a v e r a g e d 2 4 4 a n d 2 3 2 r e s p e c t i v e l y , r e s u l t i n g i n a 5 % d e c r e a s e . I t e m 7 J 0 0 0 2 0 6 Metrolink 91 Line Promotions To promote the opening of the 91 Line, Metrolink provided "door hangers" to Inland Empire residents and supplied newspaper insertions to local newspapers (The Press Enterprise, El Chicano, and The Black Voice). Door Hangers (sample attached), which included an offer for a free Metrolink 4 -Trip Ticket, were delivered to residents of the Inland Empire targeting specific zip codes (see attached map). In western Riverside County, a total of 212,187 Door Hangers were delivered. Throughout the Inland Empire, over 1,000 4 -trip ticket orders have been filled. - Newspaper Insertions (copy attached) were submitted to local newspapers. Insertion dates and circulation totals were: The Press Enterprise El Chicano (Thursday Only) Black Voice (Thursday Only) May 6, 9, 13, 15, 21 May 9, 16, 23 May 9, 16, 23 192,000 15,000 10,000 More detailed information relating to the 91 Line will be available at the conclusion of Metrolink's onboard survey that is scheduled to be conducted Fall 2002. Amtrak Stop in Riverside Amtrak's Southwest Chief, with service from Riverside to Chicago (and eight other states along the way), began stopping at the Riverside -Downtown Station on Monday, April 29, 2002. The first stop is at 5:53 a.m. and the second at 8:29 p.m. Boardings and alightings have resulted in an average of nine (9) passengers daily between April 29 and May 31, 2002. Impacted Parking — Rideshare2Rails Program With the increase and shifting of passengers between the Riverside and 91 Lines, and through existing parking issues that currently exists at most RCTC Metrolink stations, the Rideshare2Rails Program is making a difference through the Rideshare Incentives and Express Bus Shuttle service from Moreno Valley. Rideshare2Rails Incentives Rideshare2Rails Incentives is a carpool program that awards a one -time -only $165 discount towards the purchase of a Metrolink monthly pass. To become eligible for the discount, Metrolink ticket holders must carpool to any RCTC Metrolink station 9002,07 • Item 7J " " " f o r a c o n s e c u t i v e t h r e e - m o n t h o r 4 0 - d a y p e r i o d . D e s i g n a t e d p a r k i n g a r e a s a r e a v a i l a b l e a t a l l R C T C M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n s . S i n c e i t s i n c e p t i o n o n A p r i l 1 , 2 0 0 2 , 1 0 6 c a r p o o l e r s h a v e e n r o l l e d i n t h e p r o g r a m i m p a c t i n g p a r k i n g a t R C T C M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n s a s f o l l o w s : A s o f 6 / 7 / 0 2 R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n P e d l e y L a S i e r r a W e s t C o r o n a E x p r e s s B u s S h u t t l e f r o m M o r e n o V a l l e y T h e E x p r e s s B u s S h u t t l e _ c o m m e n c e d s e r v i c e M a r c h 4 , 2 0 0 2 . T h e s h u t t l e p r o v i d e s d i r e c t s e r v i c e . f r o m P a r k a n d R i d e l o t s l o c a t e d a t t h e M o r e n o V a l l e y M a l l a n d t h e H o m e D e p o t p a r k i n g l o t s t o t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n s t a t i o n f o r p e a k m o r n i n g t r a i n d e p a r t u r e s a n d p e a k e v e n i n g t r a i n a r r i v a l s . D u r i n g t h e f i r s t t h r e e m o n t h s o f o p e r a t i o n ( M a r c h M a y , 2 0 0 2 ) , a v e r a g e d a i l y r i d e r s h i p w a s 1 4 p a s s e n g e r s . A t t a c h m e n t : M e t r o l i n k 9 1 L i n e P r o m o t i o n s : D o o r H a n g e r , M a p , a n d N e w s p a p e r I n s e r t i o n 0 0 0 2 0 8 I t e m 7 J Molt a , rr METROLINK'S NEW 91 LINE lick n'ntrr RIVERSIDE • FULLERTON • DOWNTOWN LA HELPING RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUTERS BREATHE EASY We invite you to ride a comfort ble Metsolink train and travel traffic -free and stress -free on our. new 94 Line.. Five days a week, it provides service for coeunutees traveling to employment centers in Fullerton, Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs and downtown Los Angeles. HEADED SOUTH? Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County Line (IEOC) provides weekly commuter service from Riverside County to Orange County. Check the timetables on the back to see how our frequent train servkewil conveniently fit into your schedule Then get on Doan(... and breathe easy-. START RIDING FOR FREE Take advantage of our free 4 -Trip Ticket offer below and start riding either the 91 Line or the inland Empire -Orange County Line for free (up to a $55 value)- •lMn4knninGahruitrfe•w 6 Realalitllblamer A Rimed,Csue)h IJ/an=arR^rea+min tr. MORE GREAT REASONS TO RIDE METROUNK • Add time toyour day for reading, working or just relaxing • Reduce stress in your life by avoiding traffic • Save money on car expense such as gas and insurance • Enjoy fast commute times with speeds up to 90 mph • Travel in comfort with cushioned seats, worktables, a restwom and a wafer fountain Lain on every car • Enjoy reliable schedules and on -time performance • Complete your commute on free connecting transit FREE 4 -TRIP TICKET 000209 Imummonon oo©000000aa 410(000®EIK 411111 2 okaooao 000©aaoo©oa i 000aaaa©oa `000©oaaaoaa muIIII �, 1 003111010 ooaaoaoo©oa on000naaaoa m gilil ill il 411111 e nonoaoa0000 Q 000aanonQnn 2 oo©000aaaaa 41011111151 211111 I100000 i oa000n000no v 0000anooaoo ix0000 onam Enmnnounnno oomoaa00000 411111 e nonoaoa0000 Q 000aanonQnn 2 oo©000aaaaa 41011111151 211111 I100000 i oa000n000no v 0000anooaoo ix0000 onam Enmnnounnno oomoaa00000 BE palao(rer,;o •ruumvnm;ivuu�� �y.riaaa r.•i.aur.. u.crnuuu. •u .. .�;, NOO.) i9NVHO•fMIA44(IN V M r Y, li. R1rf R+ t f .:, . tl; !'°fd tffft :,, iltjfit ,,ffl,. ...1111 i , .111.8 fl j. i • f 14,144i,.... '. f1111111 FH.tliiaillli C.> METROLINK'S NEW 91:LINE, RIVERSIDE • FULLERTON • DOWNTOWN LA WE'RE HELPING RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUTERS BREATHE EASY. We Invite you to ride a comfortable Metrolink train and travel trafflc•free on our new 91 Line.' Now open, It provides five•days•aweek service for co mmuters traveling to employment centers In Fullerton, Norwalk/,Santa.Fe Springs and downtown Los Angeles, Headed south? Check outMetrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County Line Juu mrourrumntaJyYyW yyYyyl�jyh!�� a ii�Io unlllllVi2?'i1...011/01.10011.0* Effe ctive Ma y 0. 2002 Salons mina al Line (Riverside • Fullerton • Downtow n LA) Inland gmplrn-Orange County Line. (1EOC), with weekly co mtnuterservice from Riverside County to Orange County, Get on board and start feeling better about your daily eam mute.,; fast. HelbCa lse venin!epithets* ellae ts*7 dowry n 'ubddleed by Maw,, A, Riverside Cowry's ieMETRQLi .NK, 800.371.LIN K(5465) ww w,rnetrollnktra na.eom 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Karen Leland, Staff Analyst Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Commuter Rail Program Update PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Commuter Rail Program Update as an information item. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Riverside Line • • Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Riverside Line for the month of May averaged 4,288, a 6% decrease from the month of April. The Line has averaged an overall decrease of 11% from a year ago May 2001. May on -time performance averaged 96% inbound (2% increase from April) and 92% outbound (6% decrease from April). On March 15th, staff circulated resolutions of support from cities and the county regarding Metrolink's effort to urge Union Pacific Railroad to improve on -time performance on the Riverside Line. An update on the number of resolutions received will be provided at the Committee meeting. Inland Empire -Orange County Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line for the month of May averaged 2,916, a 4% increase from the month of April. The Line has averaged an overall decrease of 2% from a year ago May 2001. Item 7K 000213 91 Line Weekday Patronage: Passenger trips on Metrolink's 91 Line for the month of May averaged 847, a 677% increase from the month of April via the Riv/Full/LA Line. Special Trains Beach Train: The 2002 Beach Train season will officially begin on June 29, 2002, with service to San Juan Capistrano, San Clemente Pier, and Oceanside. Strong pre -season ticket sale revenue is 21 % above last year this time due in part to multiple large group ticket orders (Kaiser — 100, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center — 140, Singh Chevrolet — 1,150). Tickets can be purchased at the cities of Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley, and San Bernardino Parks and Recreation, Rialto City Clerk's Office, RCTC Mail Order, and on-line or by phone through Amtrak. Rideshare 2 Rails (R2R) Program . .. ............._._.__._.._.. ..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .__..__............ _.._.__.. ....._. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rideshare ARMIES Rideshare Incentives: Current enrollment is at 106 (Riverside -Downtown 32, Pedley 15, La Sierra 24, West Corona 35), freeing up 52 spaces for new riders. RTA Express Bus Shuttle: Ridership for the month of May averaged 16 per week day, which is basically unchanged from the month of April. Station Update RCTC Metrolink Station Daily Activities: Daily activities are recorded by station security guards. Attached is summary data covering May 2002. Attachments: 1) Metrolink Performance Summaries (May 2002) 2) RCTC Metrolink Stations Daily Activity Report (May 2002) • • • Item 7K 000214 36,000 ME1111SLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS 33,712 34,000 32,000 30,000 28,000 26,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 33,864 Sep -01 Oct -01 Nov -01 ® Holiday Adj Unadj Avg 1 -02 Apr -0200216 May 0 METROLINK ON -TIME PERFORMANCE Weekday Trains, (Latest 13 Months) 000218 % of Train Delays By Responsibility May 2002 TRK-Contractor 2% UPRR 5% SIG -Contractor. 4% SCRRA 14% Passenger Othe 2% 5% Includes W eekend Service OP Agree 4% Law-Enimprov (SCRRA) 0% 8% Vandalism 7% Mechanical 15% UPRR TRK-Contractor 2% SIG -Contractor 7% Includes Weekend Service SCRRA 10% of Train Delays By Responsibility 12 Month Peri od Ending May 2002. Vandalism 5% Passenger. 3% OP Agree1% 2% Other 7% Mechanical 12% rov (SCRRA) 3% BNSF 27% O• 219 5 PERFORMANCE CHARTS -BACK-UP 11(�1lI METROLINK 6 0 ONO May 01 3,702 • METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS THIRTEEN MONTH WINDOW - HOLIDAY ADJUSTED 5,551 10,117 457 4,802 Jun 01 3,493 5,862 10,244 482 4,799 5,999 5,896 Jul 01 3,416 5,489 9,848 456 4,690 Aug 01 Sep 01 3,315 3,323 5,423 5,463 9,679 9,503 469 435 4,638 4,566 Oct 01 Nov 01 3,558 3,500 5,170 5,169 10,032 10,025 452 477 4,651 4,654 Dec 01 Jan 02 Feb 02 3,144 3,566 3,612 4,898 4,813 5,031 9,391 10,086 10,235 452 480 464 4,223 4,596 4,635 5,853 5,879 5,940 5,867 5,939 5,369 5,865 5,882 Mar 02 3,650 5,135 10,082 518 4,615 Apr 02 3441 4913 10124 507 4524 5,931 5848 2,974 2,983 2,838 2,833 2,923 3,081 3,007 2,733 2,930 3,010 3,033 May 02 % Change May02vsApr02 5,597 525 4% 3,565 4% 10,039 -1% 4,288 -5% 5,794 2791 110 105 92 105 102 122 137 97 107 109 133 109 33,712 33,864 32,682 32,341 32,255 32,933 32,908 3% 0% -3 ok -1 % 30,307 32,443 32,978 33,097 32257 0% 2% 0% -8% 7% 2% 0% -3 2,916 847 33,571 -1%I 4%I 677%I 4%I 4% 000221 METROLINK AVERAGE WEEKDAY PASSENGER TRIPS INCEPTION TO DATE San Bernardino Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Avg Daily Riders 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 May 01 Jun Jul Aug Sep [Note: Sept Includes L. A. County Fair Riders' Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May -02 3500 3000 E 2500 IX • 2000- p 1500- rn Q 1000- 500 - May 01 Jun [No te: Sunday Service Began 0825/00 San Bernardino Line Sunday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May -02 0 001022 Riverside Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips Antelope. Valley Line Saturday Service Average Daily Passenger Trips 3500 3000- 0 2500- .0 CC 2000 p 1500 0) Q 1000- 500 - May 01 Jun . Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May -02 Note: Service Began June 24, 2000 - Service Discontinued January 19, 20021 00020 • • 10 M ar 01 Apr 01 May 01 Jun 01 Jul 01 Aug 01 Sep 01 Oct 01 Nov 01 Dec 01 Jan 02 Feb 02 Mar 02 Apr 02 May 02 74 % 80% 97% 99% 95% 89% 98 % 99% 100% 98% 97 % 98% 98% 98% 100% 99% 97% • 99% 99% 98% 99% 99% 100% 100% 98% 100% 98%. • 99% 98% 99% 98% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100% 99% 97% 98% 96% 99% 97% 99% 100% 98% 97% 99% 99% 97% 97% 98% 99% 99% 100% 97% 97% 97% 94% 97% 93% 98% 98% • METROLINK SCHEDULE ADHERENCE SUMMARY Percentage of Trains Arriving Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time LATEST 13 MONTHS 98 % 99% 96% 95 % 98% 97 % 97% 97% 100% 98% 99% 99% 100 % 100 % 98 % 99 % 96% 94 % 99% 98% 98% 96% 100 % • 99% 98 % 99% 98% 98% 97% 98% 97% 99% 100% 100% 100 % 100% 97 % T00% 98% 99% 97% 96% 100% 97% 97% 97% 97% 98% 95% 97% 96% Peak Period Trains Arriv ing Within 5 Minutes of Scheduled Time Peak Period Trains 98% . 99% 98% 98% 95% No adjustments have been made for relievable delays. Terminated trains are considered OT if they were on -time at point of termination. Annulled trains are not included In the on -time calculation. 99% 99% 98% 99% 100% 100% 99% 100% 98% 97% 93 %,. 91 % 88% 89% 91% 93% 94 % 90%J 86% 94% 97% 89 % 94% 83 % 89 % 96 % 95% 91 % 87 % 83 % 87% 88% 92% 91% 90 % 87 % 88% 93% 94% 91% 92% 95% 88 % 83% 93% 94 % 91% 93% 91 % 86 %I 97 % 94% 95 % 81% 92 % 94% 94% 98 % 96% 92% 94% 91% 97% 92% 92% 98% 99% 95 % 95 % 83 % 95 % 96 % 95 % 94% 92 % 97% 94 % 98 % 92 % 90% 95 % 98% 96% 95% 95% 91 % 82% 98% 90% 100% 91% 92 % 94% 95% 96% 96% 96 % 93 % 96% 96 % 90 % 98% 95 % 89 % 95% 95% _95 % 95 % 92% 73 % 98 % 85% 95 % 96% 86 % 98 % 95 % 95% 89% 87% - 87 % 92 % 87 % 83% 95 % 96% 95% 96% 91% 96 % 95% 93 % 92% 96 % 95% 96 % 93 % 93% 96% 96 % 98 % 96% 95% 96% 96 % 97% 94 % 96% 96% 95 % 94% vaiimiL,� &€ w -? � °sA � St L a a. " 85% .91 % 85% 87 % 74% 95% 93% 94% 96% 96% 96°A 95% 96°A 95% 95% 96% 96%c 96% 96% 96% 97% 96% 94 % 000225 11 CAUSES OF METROLINK DELAYS MAY 2002 PRIMARY CAUSE OF TRAIN DELAYS GREATER THAN 5 MINUTES CAUSE: VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC INL/OC R/F/L TOTAL % of TOT Signals/Detectors 0 0 9 1 2 8 4 2 26 16% Slow Orders/MOW 2 0 0 0 1 7 2 1 13 8% Track/Switch 0 1 1 1 0 7 4 3 17 10% Dispatching 0 0 0 0 3 21 11 15 50 30% Mechanical 0 2 7 0 3 2 3 2 19 11% Freight Train 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% Amtrak Train 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 2% Metrolink Meet/Turn 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 4 2% Vandalism 0 3 4 0 2 1 3 3 16 10% Passenger(s) 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 5 3% SCRRA Hold Policy 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1% Other 3 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 11 7% TOTAL 8 11 25 2 15 50 28 27 166 100% Saturday SNB 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 Saturday AVL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunday SNB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 •5CAUS.xls MINUTES LATE: FREQUENCY OF TRAIN DELAYS BY DURATION MAY' 2002 NO DELAY 1MIN • 5MIN 6 MIN • 10 MIN 11 MIN • 20 MIN 21 MIN • 30 MIN GREATER THAN 30 MIN ANNULLED VEN AVL SNB BUR RIV OC IE/OC RIV/FUL TOTAL TRAINS OPTD TRAINS DELAYED >0 min TRAINS DELAYED > 5 min 404 471 541 203 233 314 203 144 26 40 94 15 16 51 33 9 1 3 11 2 2 23 11 8 3 8 12 0 9 15 10 9 1 0. 2. 0 0 10 4 4 3 0 0 0 4 2 3 6 438 522 660 220 264 415 34 51 119 264 0 180 TOTAL % of TOT 2513 284 61 66 21 18 17 31 101 61 36 8 11 25 2 15 50 28 27 2 2963 450 166 84,8% 9.6% 21% 2.2% 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% 100% 15.2% 5 .6% 000227 13.. 0205FREQ.xIs 1 - Standard Procedures 2 - Criminal Incidents 3 - Crisis Situations 4 - Maintenance / Repairs 6 - Parked Ovemight 5 - Miscellaneous 7 - Overflow 9 - Empty Spaces 90 - Unsecured Vehicles 91 - R2R Vehicles Daily Activity Report Metrolink Stations Generated from 5/01/02 to 5/31/02 1A - RCTC Staff on Site 1B - Customer Assistance 1C - Ambassador on Site Riverside Pedley La Sierra W. Corona Total 4 1 1 3 9 31 31 31 31 124 26 0 18 18 62 Total 61 32 50 52 195 2A - Burglary / Theft / Vandalism 2 0 0 0 2 2B - Vagrants / Trespassing 3 0 0 0 3 2D - Criminal Behavior 1 0 0 0 1 3A - Medical / Fire Emergencies 3B - Police Emergencies Total 2 0 0 0 2 4A - Lights 1 1 3 0 5 4B - TVM / Validator Machine 7 5 7 5 24 4C - Elevator 1 0 2 0 3 4D - Station Cleaning 11 10 6 12 39 4D - Station Cleaning 0 0 1 0 1 4E - Landscaping 7 5 6 7 25 4F - Dumpster/Porta Potti 2 9 5 4 20 4G - Pepsi Vending 0 2 2 1 5 Total 29 32 32 29 122 Total 6 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 5A - Miscellaneous Activity 5A - Miscellaneous Activity 6A - Parked Ovemight 7A - Veh. In Overflow 9A - Empty Spaces 90A - Unsecured Vehicles 91A - R2R Vehicles 0 1 0 0 1 10 11 9 16 46 Total 10 12 9 16 47 24 4 6 7 10 Total 24 4 6 7 10 0 0 17 0 17 Total 0 0 17 0 17 62 0 0 0 62 Total 62 0 0 0 62 0 7 13 0 20 Total 0 7 13 0 20 3 2 3 3 11 Total 3 2 3 3 11 000228 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 L " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Extension for the City of Cathedral City BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to grant the City of Cathedral City a nine -month extension to February 28, 2003, to complete the Downtown Pedestrian Bridge project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Cathedral City was allocated $97,000 in FY 99-00 SB 821 funds for construction of the Downtown Pedestrian Bridge project at the North Cathedral Canyon Channel. The City requested and was granted two extensions, one for six months and a second extension for five months, to complete the project. However, the City has run into additional problems in completing the project. The project was advertised and bids were received, but the bids received were determined to be non -responsive. The project was then reconfigured to exclude work by city forces. Also, the project was expanded to include additional improvements to enhance the usage and access of the facility. These improvements required additional time to coordinate with the property owner of the Perez Industrial Park, SunLine Transit, the Riverside County Flood Control District and Southern California Edison. The revised project plans and specifications are complete. Therefore, the City is requesting another nine -month extension to February 28, 2003, to complete the project. Attachment: Letter from Cathedral City Requesting an extension for the Pedestrian Bridge Project Item 7L 000229 Cathedral ity • • May 7, 2002 RECEIVED MAY 1 0 2002 BECHTEL CORP Riverside Office 059547 File No. PED 6.20 Mr. Jerry Riverra, Program Manager RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, Ca. 92501 Re: CATHEDRAL CITY; SB-821; REQUEST FOR A TIME EXTENSION FOR THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT Please consider this letter to be the request of the City of Cathedral City for a time extension for the completion of the Pedestrian Bridge construction project. The time extension is needed for completion of outstanding tasks described in more detail below. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AT THE NORTH CATHEDRAL CANYON CHANNEL Previously the project was advertised and bids were received for furnishing a prefabricated bridge structure to be set on a foundation to be constructed by City forces. The bids that were received were determined to be non -responsive. The project is now reconfigured to exclude work by City forces. In addition, the project is expanded to include construction of a sidewalk connection and for an improved bus stop on Perez Road. The project will also include construction of an arbor system over the sidewalk and for installation of street lighting and security lighting along the sidewalk. These additions will enhance the usage and access to the Downtown area and create a multimodal pedestrian access facility. It has required additional time to coordinate with the property owner of the Perez Industrial Park, Sunline Transit, Riverside County Flood Control District and with SCE for electrical power requirements for the walkway and bridge lighting. The City now has a sidewalk easement from the property owner and an encroachment permit from the Flood Control District for the work in the North Cathedral Canyon Channel. The revised project plans and specifications are complete. Bid proposals for the project will be opened on May 30, 2002. A construction contract will be approved 68-700 AVENIDA LALO GUERRERO • CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 • 760/770-0340 • FAX: 760%202-1460 o00230 at the first City Council meeting in June and the Notice to Proceed will be issued in late June, 2002. A lead-time will be required for ordering and fabrication of the bridge. Construction will be completed by mid December 2002. The City has expended additional funds for the design, soils engineering, electrical design, and for preparing the revised plans and specifications required to readvertise the project and for other appurtenant items related to the project. The City has advanced the project in good faith. The added improvements and need to coordinate with outside entities with other priorities has slowed the progress. Therefore, we request an additional P -month extension, until iaecerrybur 31720027. Pre b. 2. .8,, 2_ae,a Your favorable decision about this request for a time extension for the Pedestrian Bridge project is appreciated. Please contact Bill Bayne at 760/770-0360, or the undersigned, at 760/770-0350, if you have questions or require additional information about this very important SB-821 project. Sincerely, Dave R. Faessel, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer cc: Bill Bayne, Cathedral City Brad Bradley, Cathedral City 000231 AGENDA ITEM 7M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2002-2003 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendations BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 02-03 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program recommended funding as shown on the attached schedule. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • • In April, Commission staff notified the cities, the county, and local school districts that an estimated $890,032 would be available for programming in FY 02-03 through the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program. This program is funded by an allocation of 2% of the total Local Transportation Fund (LTF) apportioned to Riverside County by the State and funds carried -over from prior years. Carryover funds available this year totaled $163,554 from higher estimated revenues and from previously approved projects which either did not expend their full allocation due to lower than estimated actual costs or were subsequently abandoned by the applicants for various reasons. Total available funds for FY 2002-03 are $1,053,586. The SB 821 proposals were due May 31, 2002. The Commission received 42 proposals (2 bicycle projects, 35 sidewalk projects, and 5 ADA related retrofit projects) from 17 agencies requesting a total of $2,064,431 (Attachment 1). An evaluation committee comprised of three members from the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee and three members from the Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the proposals on June 10, 2002. All of the applicants were invited to the meeting and requested to present their proposals to the committee and answer questions from the members. The proposals were evaluated and ranked based upon the Commission adopted scoring criteria (Attachment II). Twenty-six projects are recommended for funding as indicated on Attachment III. Item 7M 000232 Attachments: 1) SB 821 Program Submittals FY 02-03 2) SB 821 Evaluation Criteria 3) SB 821 FY 02-03 Recommended Funding 000233 It[n 7M Attachment I • RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2002-03 Banning (7) Wilson St. Sidewalk Nicolet St. Sidewalk - Sunrise Ave./16th St. Florida St. Sidewalk George St. Sidewalk Nicolet St. Sidewalk - Fay Ave./Hargrave St. Sunset Ave. Sidewalk 3rd St. Sidewalk Total $80,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000 $35,000 $35,000 $24,000 $12,000 $12,000 $55,000 $27,500 $27,500 $45,000 $22,500 $22,500 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $20,000 $1.0,000 $10,000 $344,000 $172,000 $172,000 Beaumont Bike Lane & Pedestrian Trails Project $482,731 $84,331 $398,400 Blythe (2) Rice St. Sidewalk - Sixth to Seventh St. $16,900 $13,520 $3,380 6th St. Sidewalk Rice to Dekema St. $20,475 $16,380 $4,095 Total $37,375 $29,900 $7,475 Cathedral City Dream Homes Sidewalk Improve. Project $63,000 $34,650 $28,350 Corona Pedestrian & Bicyclist Accessibility Project $116,840 $101,600 $15,240 Desert Hot Springs Ocotillo Road Sidewalk $42,908 $38,617 $4,291 Hemet San Jacinto Ave. Sidewalks & Access Ramp Improvement Project $65,690 $52,700 $12,990 Indian Wells Highway 111 Sidewalk $60,000 $30,000 $30,000 Indio (3) Avenue 48 Sidewalk - Oasis St. to Monroe St. $160,022 $114,000 $46,022 Dr. Carreon Blvd. Sidewalk & Ramps $37,780 $23,540 $14,240 Avenue 44 Sidewalk $28,715 $16,807 $11,908 Total $226,517 $154,347 $72,170 000234 Attachment I RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2002-03 La Quinta La Quinta Community Park Sidewalk Improve. Moreno Valley (4) Gold Place Sidewalk Gentian Ave. Sidewalk Accessibility Enhancements Sunnymead Blvd. Wheelchair Ramps Total Murrieta Jefferson Ave. Sidewalk Palm Springs Racquet Club Dr. Sidewalk - Priority 1 Racquet Club Dr. Sidewalk - Priority 2 Total Perris Navajo Road Handicap Ramps $79,790 $55,853 $23,937 $45,000 $22,500 $22,500 $35,750 $17,875 $17,875 $35,100 $17,550 $17,550 $14,000 $7,000 $7,000 $129,850 $64,925 $64,925 $117,000 $87,750 $29,250 $49,000 $29,400 $19,600 $49,000 $29,400 $19,600 $98,000 $58,800 $39,200 $140,000 $70,000 $70,000 Riverside (5) Vasquez Place Sidewalk $81,396 $40,698 $40,698 La Sierra Ave. Sidewalk $82,790 $41,395 $41,395 Norwood Avenue Sidewalk $119,750 $36,315 $83,435 School Access Project $176,195 $78,550 $97,645 Wheelchair Ramp Construction $114,000 $57,000 $57,000 Total $574,131 $253,958 $320,173 Attachment I • RCTC SB 821 PROGRAM SUBMITTALS FY 2002-03 Riverside County (9) Krameria Ave. Library Sidewalk Clark St. Sidewalk Mission Blvd. Sidewalk Rubidoux Blvd. Sidewalk Dartmouth St. Sidewalk Newport Road/Calle Tomas Sidewalk La Canada Way Sidewalk Clinton St. Sidewalk Center St. Sidewalk Total San Jacinto Sidewalk & Ramps Improvement Project $152,000 $120,000 $32,000 $57,000 $48,000 $9,000 $223,000 $102,000 $121,000 $94,920 $64,000 $30,920 $165,000 $132,000 $33,000 $32,000 $27,000 $5,000 $138,500 $118,000 $20,500 $49,000 $44,000 $5,000 $50,000 $45,000 $5,000 $961,420 $700,000 $261,420 $150,000 $75,000 $75,000 Grand Totals -17 Agencies 42 Projects $3,689,252 $2,064,431 $1,624,821 JR: 6/13/02 Total SB 821 Funds Available $999,056 00023f Attachment II SB 821 EVALUATION CRITERIA • FACTOR 1. USE MAXIMUM POINTS 25 The extent of potential use of a bicycle or pedestrian facility is the most important factor. Emphasis of this factor helps ensure the greatest benefits will be derived from the expenditure of SB 821 funds. Relative usage is to be derived from analysis of trip generators and attractors adjacent to the project. 2. SAFETY 20 Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to correct current safety problems. 3. IMPORTANCE AS A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE 20 Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to attract users who would otherwise use an automobile. 4. MISSING LINK, EXTENSION, OR CONNECTIVITY 15 Points are awarded to projects that link existing facilities or are extensions of or potentially connect to existing facilities. 5. MATCHING FUNDS 10 This factor is used to help ensure that there is local funding participation in the project - not just a application for "free" money. One point would be awarded for each 5% of total project cost that is financed by the local agency. 6. POPULATION EQUITY The purpose of this factor is to help ensure that one agency does not receive all the funds. The applicant receives the maximum 10 points if the amount of funds requested does not exceed what the applicant would receive if the funds were allocated by population. Year to year totals are recorded so that an applicant could build up a "credit". (Calculated by RCTC) 10 7. PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY ENHANCEMENT 10 BONUS The purpose of this factor is to enhance the physical accessibility of existing pedestrian projects. Applicant agencies may receive up to 10 "bonus" points for their project proposals which improve the physical access to existing facilities. • RCTC: 4/12/95 000237 R an k Agency 1 Moreno Valley 2 Riv erside 3 San Jacinto 4 Riv erside County 5 Perris 6 Indio 6 Moren o Valley 8 Blythe 9 Bann in g 10 Palm Springs 11 Cathedral City 12 Coron a 13 Hemet 14 Riv erside 15 Blythe 16 Riverside County 17 Ban ning 18 Bannin g 19 Riverside 20 Bannin g 21 Banning 21 Palm Sprin gs 23 Bann ing 23 Riv erside 25 Moren o V alley 25 Riverside County • • RIVERSIDE COUNT Y TR ANSPO RT ATION C OMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AN D PE DESTRI AN FACILITIES PR OGRAM FY 2002-03 RECOMMENDED FUN DI NG Project Description Attachment III Total SB 821 F unds Recommended C umm ulative Average Costs Req uested Allocatio n F unds Allocated Score Sunnymead Bl vd . Wheelchair Ramps $14,000 $7,000 $7,000 $7,000 88.0 Wheelchair Ramp Construction Project $114,000 $57,000 $57,000 $64,000 85.3 Sidewalk & Ramp Impro veme nt Project $150,000 $75,000 $75,000 $139,000 84.7 Mission Bl vd . Sidewalk $223,000 $102,000 $102,000 $241,000 83.7 N avajo Road Handicap Ramps $140,000 $70,000 $70,000 $311,000 83.5 Dr. Carrion Bl vd . Sidewalk $37,780 $23,540 $23,540 $334,540 83.0 Accessibility Enha ncements $35,100 $17,550 $17,550 $352,090 83.0 6th St. Sidewalk $20,475 $16,380 $16,380 $368,470 80.7 N icolet St. Sidewalk - Sunrise/16th St. $70,000 $35,000 $35,000 $403,470 79.7 Racqu et Clu b Dr. Sidewalk #1 $49,000 $29,400 $29,400 $432,870 79.5 Dream Homes Sidewalk $63,000 $34,650 $34,650 $467,520 79 .0 Ped. & Bicyclist A ccessibility Project $116,840 $101,600 $101,600 $569,120 78.4 San Jacinto A ve Sidewalk/Access Ramps $65,690 $52,700 $52,700 $621,820 76.8 La Sierra Ave. Sidewalk $82,790 $41,395 $41,395 $663,215 76 .2 Rice Street Sidewalk $16,900 $13,520 $13,520 $676,735 75 .5 Rubidoux Blvd. Sidewalk $94,920 $64,000 $64,000 $740,735 75 .5 Su nset Av e. Sidewalk $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $765,735 75.2 George St. Sidewalk $55,000 $27,500 $27,500 $793,235 75.0 N orwood Av e. Sidewalk $119,750 $36,315 $36,315 $829,550 73.8 3rd A ve. Sidewalk $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $839,550 72 .7 Florida St. Sidewalk $24,000 $12,000 $12,000 $851,550 72.5 Racquet Club Dr. Sidewalk #2 $49,000 $29,400 $29,400 $880,950 72.5 Nicolet St. Sidewalk - Fay/Hargrave $45,000 $22,500 $22,500 $903,450 71 .5 School Access Project $176,195 $78,550 $78,550 $982,000 71.5 Gentian Av enue Sidewalk $35,750 $17,875 $17,875 $999,875 70.3 Clark St. Sidewalk $57,000 $48,000 $48,000 $1,047,875 70.3 000238 27 Beaumont 28 Desert Hot Springs 28 More no Valley 30 Riverside Co unty 31 Banning 31 Riverside 33 Indio 34 Murrieta 35 R iverside County 36 Riverside Coun ty 37 Riverside County 38 Indio 39 Riv erside County 40 La Quin ta 41 In dian Wells 42 Riverside Coun ty Totals JR : 6/13/02 Rev. 6/20/02 Bike Lane & Pedestrian Trails Project Octillio Road Sidewalk Gold Place Sidewalk Dartmouth St. Sidewalk Wilson St. Sidewalk Vasquez Place Sidewalk Avenue 44 Sidewalk Jefferson Ave. Sidewalk La Ca nada Way Sidewalk Ne wport Road/Calle Tomas Sidewalk Krameria Ave. Sidewalk Avenue 48 Sidewalk Center St. Sidewalk La Quinta Community Park Sidewalk Highway 111 Sidewalk Clinton St. Sidewalk $482,731 $84,331 $42,908 $38,617 $45,000 $22,500 $165,000 $132,000 $80,000 $40,000 $81,396 $40,698 $28,715 $16,807 $117,000 $87,750 $138,500 $118,000 $32,000 $27,000 $152,000 $120,000 $160,022 $114,000 $50,000 $45,000 $79,790 $55,853 $60,000 $30,000 $49,000 $44,000 $0 $1,047,875 67.3 $0 $1,047,875 65.8 $0 $1,047,875 65.8 $0 $1,047,875 65.7 $0 $1,047,875 65.3 $0 $1,047,875 65.3 $0 $1,047,875 65.3 $0 $1,047,875 64.0 $0 $1,047,875 62 .9 $0 $1,047,875 62.3 $0 $1,047,875 61.3 $0 $1,047,875 57.3 $0 $1,047,875 51.5 $0 $1,047,875 51.2 $0 $1,047,875 47.7 $0 $1,047,875 36.1 $3,6$9,25Z $2,Q64,431 $1.Q47.$75, ova • AGENDA ITEM 7N • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Tanya Love, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Demonstration Express Bus Service on State Route 91 PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Support the implementation of two demonstration express bus routes on the SR 91 corridor; and, 2) Allocate up to $400,000 in Measure "A" Specialized Transportation - Commuter Assistance Program funds. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: To address traffic congestion on the SR 91 corridor, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), and Commission staff developed four demonstration express bus routes to better serve the corridor. The partnership effort has spent significant time in assessing what types of service might best draw single occupant vehicle drivers to use dedicated bus service between Riverside and Orange Counties. To that end, the demonstration routes have been designed to provide a.m. and p.m. peak period options for commuters traveling to and from home and work between the adjoining counties. The express bus routes will be serviced by contracted, over -the -road coaches to offer commuters comfort and time savings. While four routes have been defined, the agencies staffs are recommending that two routes be implemented initially as a demonstration to determine the interest of commuters in this type of service. (See Attachment 1 for service objectives and system overview details.) If approved by the three agencies, service is anticipated to begin in January 2003. The first two routes include: a) Route 793 - Riverside/Corona to UC Irvine/Irvine Business Complex, and b) Route 794 - Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro Item 7N 000240 Based on average service miles in each county, it is proposed that costs be shared between the two transit operators, OCTA (60%) and RTA (40%). In discussions between RTA and Commission staffs, several factors were identified that caused Commission staff to propose that RCTC financially support the demonstration by contributing 50% of RTA's 40% cost share or 20% of the overall demonstration cost. The primary factor is the fact that the express bus service is specifically focused on commuters traveling to and from work. The Commission offers an extensive Commuter Assistance Program including services and incentives to employers who implement rideshare programs at their worksite and commuters who begin or continue to rideshare. Incentives are provided to commuters who carpool, vanpool, or buspool, ride Metrolink or the bus, walk, bicycle, or telecommute to work. Further, the Commission's buspool incentive program, originally adopted in 1990, provides $1,175 per month to employer/employee contracted buspool service to dedicated worksites. Given the work commute focus of the demonstration express bus routes, RCTC staff recommends that Measure "A" Specialized Transportation - Commuter Assistance Program funds be allocated to pay half of the RTA cost share as follows: • Up to $100,000 for FY 03; and • Up to $300,000 for FY 04. Staff will continue to work with RTA and OCTA to establish performance criteria, marketing plans and joint fare policies. Based on the success of Routes 793 and 794, staff may seek additional funding for Route 791' (Riverside to Anaheim Industrial) and Route 792 (Riverside to Anaheim Resort Area) late in FY 03. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N Year: FY 02-03 FY 03-04 Amount: $ 100,000 $ 300,000 Source of Funds: Measure "A" Budget Adjustment: Y GLA No.: 222-41-81501 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 06/13/02 Attachment: SR 91 Connection Express Bus Service Overview • • • • 0 bef41 ATTACHMENT 1 • • • *Implementation Schedule Schedule Jun Jul Aug SR 91 Connection Express Bus Service Overview Service Objectives High impact • Frequent service • Serve major OC employment centers High quality • Over the road coaches • HOV and toll lane routing Quick deployment • Contracted service • Existing Park & Ride Four -Route System Overview Four -route system plan • 30 minute peak headways each route • (7.112 minutes combined service) • Directional service to Orange County • from 5:00.8:00 AM • Directional service to Riverside/ Corona • from 3:30.6:00 PM ■ 26 over -the -road coaches ■ $4 one-way fare Summary of Full Service 94,438 employees served Target of 650 daily boardings 16,090 total vehicle service hours $2 million total annual cost County shares of annual mileage: • Riverside County 40% (187k mi.) • Orange County 60% (300k mi.) Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Begin Service Mar Agency Agreement Contracting --:; ----��-- -- , Startup ------- Marketing SR 91 Express Bus Service Overview *Subject to change 000242 f Demonstration Program Overview ■ Quick startup assuming use of charter buses ■ Begin with Irvine and S.Coast Metro service • 6 months of service in FY02103 ■ Phase -in service to Anaheim destinations • 6 months of service in FY03►04 ■ Full four -route service by FY04105 Summary of UC Irvine & SC Metro Routes Combined Service ■ 15 total intermediate stops ■ 51,627 employees served ■ Target of 325 daily boardings ■ 70 min avg runs (4 start in Corona) Riverside $178K $356K -$568K $771K OC $313K $626K -$929K $1,240K AGENDA ITEM 70 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Update on the Zero Emission Mobile Industrial Equipment (ZEMIE) Project PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve re-scoping of the Zero Emission Mobile Industrial Equipment project to meet Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality eligibility requirements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the May 8, 2002 Commission meeting, staff reported the status of the Zero Emission Mobile Industrial Equipment (ZEMIE) project in relation to eligibility issues and timely use of funds. This project was awarded $466,000 of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ) funds by the Commission in June 1999. The project was originally defined as a buy -down grant program to pay for the incremental cost of electric forklifts, sweepers, tow tractors and other mobile industrial equipment. Two years ago, the lead agency began the federal obligation process for these funds. Questions on the eligibility of the project for CMAQ funds were raised by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Several discussions were held, which included Congressman Baca and U. S. Department of Transportation Secretary Mineta, that determined a portion of the project (electrified idling of medium and heavy duty on -road trucks or their trailers) would be eligible for CMAQ funding. The project sponsors, Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA) and Southern California Edison (SCE), have re-scoped their project to focus on truck/trailer electrified idling projects. RCTC staff urged EDA and SCE to identify partners (e.g. refrigerated distribution centers or truck stops) in Western Riverside County that would be willing to participate in this project. Due to the passage of Item 70 000244 time since Commission approval, project funding is subject to reprogramming under AB 1012 "Use It or Lose It" provisions. RCTC staff requested EDA and SCE to identify a partner(s) within a 45 -day timeframe so that the funds can be obligated by the end of the fiscal year, September 30, 2002. Staff met with EDA and SCE on June 11, 2002. They have identified a willing partner, Norco Ranch, and have assured us that they can obligate funds by the September 30, 2002 deadline. A cost estimate and schedule is currently being refined. Staff supports the re -scope of this project. RCTC staff will closely monitor the obligation of funds. If the funds are not obligated by September 30th, staff will recommend reprogramming them to another project. Attachment: Letter from Norco Ranch • • Ite 70' 00013 luri"'1'f-2ki1U i2:02 Nurtw NO RANCII . Pr94wc' of Filch Ea4! S Egg P1odhtu. Plant 1871 MoUnr in Ave., Norco, California 9860-0910 1 June 12.2002 Mailing F.O. Box 910. Norco, California 92860-0910 (909) 737-6735 Fax (9091 737-9405 Mr. Robert Moran Economic Development Agency Riverside County 3525 14th St. Riverside, CA 92501-381S !'5ubject: Expression of conunittncnt to participate in Zero Emission Truck Idling Project Dear Mr. Moran This letter will serve as an expression of interest and cortunitracnt from Norco Ranch Inc. to participate to the fullest possible degree as the host site for tree Zero Emission Rerrigcrated Truck Idling Praiect as propo9 d by FDA, using their Caltrans (CMAQ) grant from the Riverside County Transportation Commission. After preliminary discussions, management is very positive about parts paring in this project, and we will endeavor to make our resources available as needed to advance the goals of the project. We will continue to provide detailed information about truck operations, schedules and trailer O&M costs- We own 105 refrigerated trailers of Various ages from hear new to 15 years old..We own two facilities in Riverside County, including the main plant in Norco and a distribution warehouse in Lakeview. As our ducks are itn. constant circulation between our own facilities and customer locations, we would hope to be able TOadapt the program to all applicable tracks and loading bays at both facilities, subject to availability of funds. we would agree to allow data acquisition from both truck re geration units and from plant infrastructure before and after installation- ' ts, in order One of our concerns would be ttmeij+ progress payments, to manage cash flow.aint of We would also request that our agreement $e just with EDA, a single maintaining p contact, inasmuch as possibls- Thank you for considering Norco Ranch as a host for this project. Sincerely, Eric Ewing - Operations Manager 000246 TClTRL P.02 AGENDA ITEM 7P RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee John Standiford, Public Information Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT• ' Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Regional Rideshare Contract,' Agreement No. 03-41-008 with SCAG/Southern California Rideshare PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Direct staff to negotiate a contract with SCAG/Southern California Rideshare for regional rideshare services in an amount not to exceed $35,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Southern California Rideshare and its predecessor organization have provided regional rideshare services for more than 20 years in the Southern California region of Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Ventura and Los Angeles Counties. Since FY 98-99, the transportation commissions in the five counties have provided ongoing funding to support a regional ridesharing program based on a population formula. During this same time period, Southern California Rideshare has been operated by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Until this year, RCTC and the other transportation commissions contracted with SCAG for four separate regional rideshare elements. Among the services that RCTC contracted with SCAG for included: 1) Survey and RideGuide production 2) Database management and quality assurance 3) Telephone Customer Information Center 4) Rideshare studies and regional marketing of ridesharing. Item 7P 000247 Another work area that has been funded in the past was the maintenance and operation of a computer program to generate transit itineraries throughout the region. Earlier this year, the Commission took action to direct staff to seek customer service improvements in providing items #1, 2, and 3 listed above and approved a contract for the purchase of rideshare matching software. Beginning in July, these services will be provided as part of the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program under the umbrella of Inland Empire Commuter Services (IECS), a joint program of RCTC and SANBAG. The actual service will be performed on behalf of the Commission by its longstanding commuter assistance program contractor, Inland Transportation Services (ITS), which is based in Riverside. Similar action was taken by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and SANBAG will contract with the Commission for services in San Bernardino County. All of the region's five county transportation commissions also have chosen to no longer financially support the regional transit itinerary software program since similar services for the entire region are being developed and operated by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. By taking action to no longer contract with SCAG for these services, RCTC's financial responsibility for supporting regional rideshare activities will be greatly lessened. There is still an important need to continue support ` of regional ridesharing in the Southern California region. Ridesharing is an important component in the region's transportation plans and is necessary to meet air quality conformity requirements. To further regional ridesharing initiatives, staff recommends that the Commission contract with Southern California Rideshare for ongoing regional marketing of rideshare services. Staff will also continue to work closely with the transportation commissions in neighboring counties to ensure coordination of regional rideshare services. As the lead agency and in order to pay for its share of regional rideshare marketing, it is recommended that the Commission enter into an agreement with Southern California Rideshare for an amount not to exceed $35,000. This amount would include SANBAG's proportionate share ($18,315) of which RCTC will be reimbursed by SANBAG for those costs. This practice is similar to the current contractual agreements in place with overall commuter assistance program services. • • • Item 7P 000248 At this time, staff is beginning development of a draft agreement for the service. The agreement can not be completed as yet until it is decided whether SCAG will continue to operate Southern California Rideshare or if it will be transitioned to the Southern California Economic Partnership. As a result, staff is seeking direction to negotiate a contract in July or August for the upcoming fiscal year once it is determined which agency will be slated to provide the service. The Commission's standard agreement will be used and will undergo Legal Counsel review prior to its execution. • Item 7P 000249 AGENDA ITEM 7Q • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee John Standiford, Public Information Officer THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-41-001 with Advanced Data Transcribing Center, Inc. for Data Entry Services to Support the Commuter Assistance Program PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: • 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-41-001 with Advanced Data Transcribing Center, Inc. for data entry services to support the Commuter Assistance Program and implementation of ridematching services in an amount not to exceed $45,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During its December 2001 meeting, the Commission directed staff to adopt a course of action to transition ridematching services that are currently contracted from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) by RCTC's Commuter Assistance Program. The Commission's action approved the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the procurement of software for a ridematching software system which is in the process of being installed and tested. RCTC will be ready to offer Ridematching services beginning in July. The service will be offered to Riverside and San Bernardino County residents with SANBAG reimbursing RCTC for its share of incurred costs. The purpose of this agenda item is to finalize a needed support contract. A contract with Multisystems Inc. was approved in January 2002 for a ridematching software program and services. The rideshare software provides the technological backbone for providing ridematching services to local commuters. Residents seeking carpool partners can complete a survey and request a RideGuide which provides them with a matchlist of commuters with similar travel itineraries. Item 7Q 00025,9.; In order to process the survey and produce a matchlist, data from a commuter survey must be entered into an electronic database. The information includes a commuter's work and home addresses and work hours as well as other pertinent commuter information. Entering this data is labor intensive and time consuming and is typically contracted out to a data entry firm. This is normally done on a piecework basis with a charge for each record that is entered into the database. RCTC staff issued a solicitation for data entry in May and received two bids for this type of service from Advanced Data Transcribing Center in Rosemead and Stewart's Data Service in Huntington Beach. Staff is recommending the selection of Advanced Data Transcribing Center, Inc. (ADTC) based on the firm's experience and unit cost. ADTC has been performing similar work for SCAG since 1995 and has demonstrated an accuracy rate that exceeds 99 percent. The firm is familiar with the data that they will be asked to manipulate and will perform the work for a maximum of 45 cents for each two-sided survey, a rate which is less than half of the second bid. Currently, there are as many as 78,000 Inland Empire residents in the Southern California Rideshare database. Normally, surveys for ridematching are offered to commuters through their employers. This year, staff expects to process as many as 100,000 ridematching surveys which would incur a data entry cost of $45,000. Attachments: 1) Proposal for Data Entry Services in Support of a Ridematching Program 2) Draft Agreement No. 03-41-001 for Data Entry Services • • Item 7Q 000251f Proposal For Solicitation for Data Entry Services in Support of a Ridematching Program for Riverside County Transportation Commission From Advanced Data Transcribing Center 8256 East Garvey Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Contact: Patty Kwan 626-571-1570 June 5, 2002 000252 SCOPE OF WORK Batched data is to be shipped by the customer to Advanced Data Transcribing Center (ADTC) by overnight express or other means as customer deems appropriate. After arriving at ADTC the data is then checked by the Shift Supervisor at the direction of the Project Manager. The batch distribution is performed such that after the data is entered by one operator, it is verified by another operator thus ensuring maximum accuracy. When all batches are entered and verified the data may then be delivered on-line via modem if so desired. The data is then written to a 3%2" Standard IBM Format diskette. The data diskette and the original data are then delivered back to the customer by normal freight delivery or overnight express if on-line delivery cannot be made. A backup of the data is maintained on site for 90 days as a security measure. QUALIFICATIONS, STAFFING, AND EXPERIENCE Advanced Data Transcribing Center is a California corporation located just East of downtown Los Angeles in the city of Rosemead at 8256 East Garvey Avenue. All work is performed at this location. The management and staff have the experience necessary to perform all the tasks and ensure that all the objectives are met well within the constraints of this solicitation. The volume of work performed and the variety of layouts and formats required for the entire client base of ADTC has provided us with expertise and experience hard to match in data entry services. On -time performance and error rates well below required levels combine to provide a reliable source of data conversion services. The standard that we uphold is to maintain as an absolute minimum a 99% accuracy rate. Our standing policy is to correct at our cost any data exceeding a 1% error rate. If a shorter turnaround time is desired ADTC can also deliver data by modem, providing that the customer is similarly equipped. ADTC has been performing this same work for Commuter Transportation Services since 1983 until the transfer to SCAG in 1995 and to the present time. Other jobs ADTC performs include payrolls, inventory, name and address lists, accounts payable and receivable, etc. 000253 REFERENCES Southern California Association of Governments Southern California Rideshare 818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3435 Jim Simms 213 236-1980 Los Angeles County Auditor Controller 500 W. Temple St., Rm. 410 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Freddie Williams 213 974-8502 Ford Printing & Mailing 125 N Vineland Avenue Irwindale, CA 91706 Jack Duncan 626-968-3673 000."54 COST PROPOSAL The cost per record entered and verified is as follows: Commuter Transportation Survey Form Both Sides Side Marked "Commuter" Side Marked "AVR" $0.45 $0.35 $0.18 No Set-up Fees will be charged Special keypunch instructions are to be priced on a case -by -case basis. Generally there will be no change -in price from normal unless there is a significant change in workload for each form. Invoicing will occur on a weekly basis. Invoices will contain the following information: a. Billing period b. Quantity of each type of form keyed c. Unit price per each type of form d. Total price e. Contract number f. Batch numbers Term of payment is 15 days net. Prices quoted in this proposal will remain in effect for the next 90 days. 000255 " " " D R A F T A g r e e m e n t # 0 3 - 4 1 - 0 0 1 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N C O N S U L T A N T A G R E E M E N T W I T H A D V A N C E D D A T A T R A N S C R I B I N G C E N T E R , I N C . 1 . P A R T I E S A N D D A T E . T h i s A g r e e m e n t i s m a d e a n d e n t e r e d i n t o t h i s 1 s t d a y o f J u l y , 2 0 0 2 b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N ( " C o m m i s s i o n " ) a n d A D V A N C E D D A T A T R A N S C R I B I N G C E N T E R , I N C . ( " C o n s u l t a n t " ) . C o m m i s s i o n a n d C o n s u l t a n t a r e s o m e t i m e s i n d i v i d u a l l y r e f e r r e d t o a s " P a r t y " a n d c o l l e c t i v e l y a s " P a r t i e s " . 2 . T E R M S . 2 . 1 S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s a n d T e r m . 2 . 1 . 1 G e n e r a l S c o p e o f S e r v i c e s a n d W a r r a n t y . C o n s u l t a n t p r o m i s e s a n d a g r e e s t o f u r n i s h t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a l l l a b o r , m a t e r i a l s , t o o l s , e q u i p m e n t , s e r v i c e s , a n d i n c i d e n t a l a n d c u s t o m a r y w o r k n e c e s s a r y t o f u l l y a n d a d e q u a t e l y s u p p l y t h e d a t a e n t r y s e r v i c e s r e q u i r e d b y C o m m i s s i o n ( " S e r v i c e s " ) . T h e S e r v i c e s a r e m o r e p a r t i c u l a r l y d e s c r i b e d i n E x h i b i t " A " a t t a c h e d h e r e t o a n d i n c o r p o r a t e d h e r e i n b y r e f e r e n c e . A l l S e r v i c e s s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o , a n d p e r f o r m e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h , t h i s A g r e e m e n t a n d a l l a p p l i c a b l e l o c a l , s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l a w s , r u l e s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s . T h e p a r t i e s a g r e e t h a t C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l n o t d r i v e o r t r a v e l i n a n y f o r m o n b e h a l f o f C o m m i s s i o n w i t h i n t h e s c o p e o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . C o n s u l t a n t w a r r a n t s t h a t a n y a n d a l l d a t a d e l i v e r e d o n - l i n e a n d / o r d i s k e t t e s d e l i v e r e d t o C o m m i s s i o n i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h E x h i b i t " A " s h a l l n o t c o n t a i n a n y v i r u s e s , t r o j a n h o r s e s , k e y l o g g e r s , t r a p d o o r s , b a c k d o o r s , e a s t e r e g g s , w o r m s , t i m e b o m b s , b o t s , e m a i l b o m b s , o r o t h e r c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m m i n g r o u t i n e s t h a t a r e i n t e n d e d t o d a m a g e , d e t r i m e n t a l l y i n t e r f e r e w i t h , s u r r e p t i t i o u s l y i n t e r c e p t o r e x p r o p r i a t e a n y s y s t e m , d a t a o r p e r s o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n . 2 . 1 . 2 T e r m . T h e t e r m o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e f r o m J u l y 1 , 2 0 0 2 a n d s h a l l c o n t i n u e f o r t w e l v e ( 1 2 ) m o n t h s t h e r e a f t e r t h r o u g h J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 2 ( " I n i t i a l T e r m " ) ; p r o v i d e d h o w e v e r , t h a t a t t h e e x p i r a t i o n o f t h e I n i t i a l T e r m , t h e A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e a u t o m a t i c a l l y e x t e n d e d f o r a n a d d i t i o n a l o n e ( 1 ) y e a r t e r m , f o r u p t o t w o ( 2 ) a d d i t i o n a l y e a r s , u n d e r t h e s a m e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s u n l e s s e i t h e r p a r t y p r o v i d e s t w e n t y ( 2 0 ) d a y s n o t i c e t o t h e o t h e r p a r t y o f i t s i n t e n t t o t e r m i n a t e t h e A g r e e m e n t p r i o r t o t h e e x p i r a t i o n o f a n y o n e ( 1 ) y e a r t e r m . R V P U B \ E L C \ 6 3 4 3 9 4 0 0 0 2 5 6 " 2 . 2 R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s o f C o n s u l t a n t . 2 . 2 . 1 I n d e p e n d e n t C o n t r a c t o r . C o n s u l t a n t w i l l d e t e r m i n e t h e m e a n s , m e t h o d s a n d d e t a i l s o f p e r f o r m i n g t h e S e r v i c e s s u b j e c t t o t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . C o m m i s s i o n r e t a i n s C o n s u l t a n t o n a n i n d e p e n d e n t c o n t r a c t o r b a s i s a n d n o t a s a n e m p l o y e e . C o n s u l t a n t r e t a i n s t h e r i g h t t o p e r f o r m s i m i l a r o r d i f f e r e n t s e r v i c e s f o r o t h e r s d u r i n g t h e t e r m o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . 2 . 2 . 2 P e r f o r m a n c e o f S e r v i c e s . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l a t a l l t i m e s f a i t h f u l l y , i n d u s t r i o u s l y , a n d t o t h e b e s t o f i t s a b i l i t y , e x p e r i e n c e , a n d t a l e n t s p e r f o r m a l l o f t h e S e r v i c e s t h a t m a y b e a s s i g n e d t o h i m . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l d e v o t e s u c h t i m e t o t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f s u c h s e r v i c e s a s m a y b e n e c e s s a r y t h e r e f o r . 2 . 2 . 3 I n s u r a n c e 2 . 2 . 3 . 1 T i m e f o r C o m p l i a n c e . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l n o t c o m m e n c e w o r k u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t u n t i l i t h a s p r o v i d e d e v i d e n c e s a t i s f a c t o r y t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n t h a t i t h a s s e c u r e d a l l i n s u r a n c e r e q u i r e d u n d e r t h i s s e c t i o n . 2 . 2 . 3 . 2 M i n i m u m R e q u i r e m e n t s . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l , a t i t s e x p e n s e , p r o c u r e a n d m a i n t a i n f o r t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e A g r e e m e n t i n s u r a n c e a g a i n s t c l a i m s f o r i n j u r i e s t o p e r s o n s o r d a m a g e s t o p r o p e r t y w h i c h m a y a r i s e f r o m o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e A g r e e m e n t b y t h e C o n s u l t a n t , i t s a g e n t s , r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s , e m p l o y e e s o r s u b c o n t r a c t o r s . S u c h i n s u r a n c e s h a l l m e e t a t l e a s t t h e f o l l o w i n g m i n i m u m l e v e l s o f c o v e r a g e : ( A ) M i n i m u m S c o p e o f I n s u r a n c e . C o v e r a g e s h a l l b e a t l e a s t a s b r o a d a s t h e l a t e s t v e r s i o n o f t h e f o l l o w i n g : ( 1 ) G e n e r a l L i a b i l i t y : I n s u r a n c e S e r v i c e s O f f i c e C o m m e r c i a l G e n e r a l L i a b i l i t y c o v e r a g e ( o c c u r r e n c e f o r m C G 0 0 0 1 ) a n d ( 2 ) W o r k e r s ' C o m p e n s a t i o n a n d E m p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l i t y : W o r k e r s ' C o m p e n s a t i o n i n s u r a n c e a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a a n d E m p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l i t y I n s u r a n c e . ( B ) M i n i m u m L i m i t s o f I n s u r a n c e . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l m a i n t a i n l i m i t s n o l e s s t h a n : ( 1 ) G e n e r a l L i a b i l i t y : $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 p e r o c c u r r e n c e f o r b o d i l y i n j u r y , p e r s o n a l i n j u r y a n d p r o p e r t y d a m a g e . I f C o m m e r c i a l G e n e r a l L i a b i l i t y I n s u r a n c e o r o t h e r f o r m w i t h g e n e r a l a g g r e g a t e l i m i t i s u s e d , e i t h e r t h e g e n e r a l a g g r e g a t e l i m i t s h a l l a p p l y s e p a r a t e l y t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t / l o c a t i o n o r t h e g e n e r a l a g g r e g a t e l i m i t s h a l l b e t w i c e t h e r e q u i r e d o c c u r r e n c e l i m i t a n d ( 2 ) W o r k e r s ' C o m p e n s a t i o n a n d E m p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l i t y : W o r k e r s ' C o m p e n s a t i o n l i m i t s a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e L a b o r C o d e o f t h e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a . E m p l o y e r ' s L i a b i l i t y l i m i t s o f $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 p e r a c c i d e n t f o r b o d i l y i n j u r y o r d i s e a s e . R V P U B \ E L C \ 6 3 4 3 9 4 " O 0 0 2 5 1 " " " 2 . 2 . 3 . 3 I n s u r a n c e E n d o r s e m e n t s . T h e i n s u r a n c e p o l i c i e s s h a l l c o n t a i n t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o v i s i o n s , o r C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l p r o v i d e e n d o r s e m e n t s o n f o r m s s u p p l i e d o r a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a d d t h e f o l l o w i n g p r o v i s i o n s t o t h e i n s u r a n c e p o l i c i e s : ( A ) G e n e r a l L i a b i l i t y . T h e g e n e r a l l i a b i l i t y p o l i c y s h a l l b e e n d o r s e d t o s t a t e t h a t : ( 1 ) t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s s h a l l b e c o v e r e d a s a d d i t i o n a l i n s u r e d w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e W o r k o r o p e r a t i o n s p e r f o r m e d b y o r o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o n s u l t a n t , i n c l u d i n g m a t e r i a l s , p a r t s o r e q u i p m e n t f u r n i s h e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h s u c h w o r k ; a n d ( 2 ) t h e i n s u r a n c e c o v e r a g e s h a l l b e p r i m a r y i n s u r a n c e a s r e s p e c t s t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s , o r i f e x c e s s , s h a l l s t a n d i n a n u n b r o k e n c h a i n o f c o v e r a g e e x c e s s o f t h e C o n s u l t a n t ' s s c h e d u l e d u n d e r l y i n g c o v e r a g e . A n y i n s u r a n c e o r s e l f - i n s u r a n c e m a i n t a i n e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s s h a l l b e e x c e s s o f t h e C o n s u l t a n t ' s i n s u r a n c e a n d s h a l l n o t b e c a l l e d u p o n t o c o n t r i b u t e w i t h i t i n a n y w a y . ( B ) W o r k e r s ' C o m p e n s a t i o n a n d E m p l o y e r s L i a b i l i t y C o v e r a g e . T h e i n s u r e r s h a l l a g r e e t o w a i v e a l l r i g h t s o f s u b r o g a t i o n a g a i n s t t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s f o r l o s s e s p a i d u n d e r t h e t e r m s o f t h e i n s u r a n c e p o l i c y w h i c h a r i s e f r o m w o r k p e r f o r m e d b y t h e C o n s u l t a n t . ( C ) A l l C o v e r a g e s . E a c h i n s u r a n c e p o l i c y r e q u i r e d b y t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e e n d o r s e d t o s t a t e t h a t : ( A ) c o v e r a g e s h a l l n o t b e s u s p e n d e d , v o i d e d , r e d u c e d o r c a n c e l e d e x c e p t a f t e r t h i r t y ( 3 0 ) d a y s p r i o r w r i t t e n n o t i c e b y c e r t i f i e d m a i l , r e t u r n r e c e i p t r e q u e s t e d , h a s b e e n g i v e n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; a n d ( B ) a n y f a i l u r e t o c o m p l y w i t h r e p o r t i n g o r o t h e r p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e p o l i c i e s , i n c l u d i n g b r e a c h e s o f w a r r a n t i e s , s h a l l n o t a f f e c t c o v e r a g e p r o v i d e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s . 2 . 2 . 3 . 4 S e p a r a t i o n o f I n s u r e d s ; N o S p e c i a l L i m i t a t i o n s . A l l i n s u r a n c e r e q u i r e d b y t h i s S e c t i o n s h a l l c o n t a i n s t a n d a r d s e p a r a t i o n o f i n s u r e d s p r o v i s i o n s . I n a d d i t i o n , s u c h i n s u r a n c e s h a l l n o t c o n t a i n a n y s p e c i a l l i m i t a t i o n s o n t h e s c o p e o f p r o t e c t i o n a f f o r d e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s . 2 . 2 . 3 . 5 D e d u c t i b l e s a n d S e l f - I n s u r a n c e R e t e n t i o n s . A n y d e d u c t i b l e s o r s e l f - i n s u r e d r e t e n t i o n s m u s t b e d e c l a r e d t o a n d a p p r o v e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l g u a r a n t e e t h a t , a t t h e o p t i o n o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n , e i t h e r : ( 1 ) t h e i n s u r e r s h a l l r e d u c e o r e l i m i n a t e s u c h d e d u c t i b l e s o r s e l f - i n s u r e d r e t e n t i o n s a s r e s p e c t s t h e C o m m i s s i o n , i t s d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c i a l s , o f f i c e r s , e m p l o y e e s , a g e n t s a n d v o l u n t e e r s ; o r ( 2 ) t h e C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l p r o c u r e a b o n d g u a r a n t e e i n g p a y m e n t o f l o s s e s a n d r e l a t e d i n v e s t i g a t i o n c o s t s , c l a i m s a n d a d m i n i s t r a t i v e a n d d e f e n s e e x p e n s e s . 2 . 2 . 3 . 6 A c c e p t a b i l i t y o f I n s u r e r s . I n s u r a n c e i s t o b e p l a c e d w i t h i n s u r e r s w i t h a c u r r e n t A . M . B e s t ' s r a t i n g n o l e s s t h a n A : V I I I , l i c e n s e d t o d o b u s i n e s s i n C a l i f o r n i a , a n d s a t i s f a c t o r y t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n . . 2 . 2 . 3 . 7 V e r i f i c a t i o n o f C o v e r a g e . C o n s u l t a n t s h a l l f u r n i s h C o m m i s s i o n w i t h o r i g i n a l c e r t i f i c a t e s o f i n s u r a n c e a n d e n d o r s e m e n t s e f f e c t i n g c o v e r a g e r e q u i r e d b y t h i s A g r e e m e n t o n R V P U B \ E L C \ 6 3 4 3 9 4 0 0 0 2 5 8 forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, and shall be on forms provided by the Commission if requested. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 2.3 Fees and Payments. 2.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) without written approval of the Executive Director. Extra Work may be authorized as described below. Rates for compensation for Extra Work shall be determined at the time such authorization is made. 2.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a weekly itemized statement which indicates work completed by Consultant. The statement shall include the following information: (a) Billing period; (b) Quantity of each type of form keyed; (c) Unit price per each type of form; (d) Total Price; (e) Contract number; and (f) Batch numbers. Commission shall, within 15 days of receiving such statement, review and pay all approved charges thereon. 2.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 2.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 2.4 General Provisions. 2.4.1 Termination of Agreement. 2.4.1.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may terminate this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those Services which have been adequately rendered to Commission. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. Should Consultant lose or destroy any of the data delivered by Commission to Consultant, Consultant will be responsible for all costs incurred by Commission to reproduce the data that was lost or destroyed. RVPUB\ELC\634394 • • 000259 2.4.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished documents and data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such documents and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 2.4.2 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 2.4.2.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. All plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, prepared by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents and Data" ), shall be the property of Commission. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Data which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Intellectual Property"). Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Intellectual Property prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Intellectual Property at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 2.4.2.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia or any publicity pertaining to the Services in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 2.4.3 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all RVPUB\ELC\634394 000260 consequential damages and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant' s own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents and volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse Commission and its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant' s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents and volunteers. 2.4.4 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and all other costs of such action. 2.4.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties. 2.4.6 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 2.4.7 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 2.4.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] RVPUB\ELC\634394 • • 000261 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y A D V A N C E D D A T A T R A N S C R I B I N G T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N C E N T E R , I N C . B y : B y : E r i c H a l e y S i g n a t u r e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r N a m e A p p r o v e d a s t o F o r m : T i t l e B e s t B e s t & K r i e g e r L L P G e n e r a l C o u n s e l R V P U B \ E L C \ 6 3 4 3 9 4 0 0 0 2 6 2 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform data entry services for Commission in the following manner: • Commission shall ship survey forms (batched data) to Consultant by overnight express or other means as Commission deems appropriate. After Consultant receives such data, the data is then checked by the Shift Supervisor at the direction of the Project Manager. The batch distribution is performed such that after the data is entered on a computer system by one operator, it is verified by another operator thus ensuring maximum accuracy. When all batches are entered and verified, the data may then be delivered on-line via modem if so desired by the Commission. The data is then written to a 32" Standard IBM Format diskette. The data diskette and the original data are then delivered back to the Commission by normal freight delivery or overnight express if so desired by the Commission. A backup of the data is maintained on site for 90 days as a security measure. RVPUB\ELC\634394 A-1 000263 EXHIBIT "B" COMPENSATION $ The cost per record entered and verified is as follows: Commuter Transportation Survey Form: (1) Both Sides $0.45 If only one side is completed, the charges are as follows: (2) Side Marked "Commuter" $0.35 (3) Side Marked "AVR" $0.18 No set-up fees will be charged. Special keypunch instructions are to be priced on a case -by -case basis as approved by Commission prior to the performance of the services. Generally there will be no change in price from normal unless there is a significant change in workload for each form. B-1 RVPUB\ELC\634394 • • • OO)264 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 R " " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: State Route 79 Cooperative Agreement No. 03-31-006 Between RCTC and Caltrans BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Cooperative Agreement No. 03-31-006 with Caltrans for the development of the SR 79 Project Report and Environmental Document (Caltrans Agreement Number 8-1 185); and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its October 14, 1998 meeting, the Commission approved an amount of $425,000 from the SB 45 2% planning funds to perform a Project Study Report (PSR), Project Report and Environmental Document (PR/ED) for the realignment of SR 79 near the Cities of Hemet and San Jacinto between Ramona Expressway and Domenigoni Parkway. The SR 79 realigned project has also been allocated $4.5 million of TEA 21 Demonstration Project funding. At its December 8, 1999 meeting, the Commission approved the PSR phase of the Project and awarded the PSR contract to CH2M Hill for $730,212. The final PSR report has been submitted to Caltrans for final review and approval. In order to have a seamless transition process from the completion of the PSR to the PR/ED phase, RCTC staff prepared and advertised a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare a Project Report and Environmental Document for the realignment of SR 79 in the vicinity of the Cities of San Jacinto and Hemet on November 6, 2001. Item 7R 000265 At its February 13, 2002 meeting, the Commission approved Agreement No. 02- 31-043 to CH2M Hill to perform the PR/ED work. The contract was for a base work amount of $1,994,497 and extra work amount of $200,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $2,194,497. A cooperative agreement for this project has been finalized by Caltrans legal counsel and is attached for review and approval. Staff has reviewed the terms and conditions of the agreement and finds that they are consistent with the agreed scope of work. A separate final design cooperative agreement will be prepared by Caltrans and will be forwarded to the Commission for approval at a future date. Attachment: SR 79 PR/ED Cooperative Agreement No. 03-31-006 (Caltrans Agreement Number 8-1 185) • • Item `' 7R • 000266 Agreement No. 103-31-006 08-Riv-79-R25.17/R45.87 Realign SR 79 from Domenigoni Parkway to the Ramona Expressway 08303 - 494000 District Agreement No. 8-1185 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into , is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE", and RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public entity, referred to herein as "COMMISSION" RECITALS (1) STATE and COMMISSION, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 114, are 'authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways within Riverside County. (2) STATE is prepared to authorize COMMISSION to assist in the preliminary project development design, including the Project Report and environmental clearance of improvements, referred to herein as "STUDY to realign State Route (SR) 79 from Domenigoni Parkway (KP R25.17) to the Ramona Expressway (KP R45.87), referred to herein as "PROJECT". (3) COMMISSION desires to prepare STUDY in order to bring about the earliest possible construction of PROJECT. (4) STATE and COMMISSION mutually desire to cooperate in STUDY and desire to specify herein the terms and conditions under which STUDY is to be prepared and financed. 1 000267 District Agreement No. 8-1185 SECTION I COMMISSION AGREES: (1) To carry out preliminary project development design and prepare the environmental document for STUDY with COMMISSION and/or COMMISSION's Consultant forces. STUDY is to be prepared in accordance with STATE's laws, rules, regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, standard plans and specifications, and other standards including compliance with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements, as provided by STATE in accordance with Section II, Article (1) of this Agreement. Said preliminary project development design and environmental document are to be subject to ongoing review and formal draft and final review and approval by STATE and FHWA. (2) To furnish STATE, prior to commencing work on STUDY, a proposed time schedule to complete the environmental document and Project Report for STUDY. (3) To furnish STATE with written progress reports upon request during the period when STUDY is being prepared. (4) To have the final STUDY documents and drawings of civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, architectural, or other engineering features of STUDY prepared by or under the direction of engineers or architects registered and licensed in the applicable professional field in the State of California. Any engineering reports, and each engineering map, drawing or plan shall bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of certificate, and signature of the professional engineer responsible for their preparation. To have environmental technical studies prepared by staff meeting the minimum professional qualifications identified by STATE. (5) To retain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred, including support data for cost proposals, and make such materials available at the respective offices of COMMISSION at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment under the contract. STATE, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of COMMISSION that are pertinent to the contract for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. 2 00`0 68 District Agreement No. 8-1185 • (5) (6) To bear one hundred percent (100%) of all actual costs of STUDY. (7) To be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits and/or encroachment permits for entry onto local agency and/or private properties for performing activities related to STUDY. SECTION II STATE AGREES: (1) To provide COMMISSION with necessary regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, standard plans and specifications, and other standards required to define the Scope of Work for the preparation of STUDY. (2) To work with COMMISSION to assure that required State and Federal procedures are followed and approvals obtained. (3) To provide prompt reviews and approvals as appropriate of submittals by COMMISSION and to cooperate in timely processing of STUDY. (4) To provide, at no cost to COMMISSION, all necessary rights of entry and permits to enter State Right of Way to perform activitiesrelated to STUDY including, but not limited to, those required for preliminary investigations and surveys. To provide all available existing State right of way related information and services required for STUDY including, but not limited to, relocation impact statements or studies. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: (1) All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature. 3 000269 District Agreement No. 8-1185 (2) STATE shall designate a STATE Project Coordinator and COMMISSION shall designate a representative through whom all communications between the two agencies shall be channeled. The STATE Project Coordinator shall review the work of COMMISSION during performance of STUDY. (3) STATE will be lead agency for environmental purposes pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and National Environmental Policy Act. The environmental document will be prepared and processed in accordance with State and Federal requirements and will be subject to State and Federal review and approval. The resulting environmental document will reflect the independent judgment of STATE. (4) COMMISSION will furnish STATE all necessary copies of preliminary project development studies and environmental documents to complete review and approval process. Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership and title to all engineering and environmental reports, documents, plans, and estimates produced as part of STUDY will automatically be vested in STATE and no further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership to STATE. (5) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care with respect to the maintenance of State highways different from the standard of care imposed by law. (6) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COMMISSION under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COMMISSION shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COMMISSION under this Agreement. (7) Neither COMMISSION nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save 4 • • • 000270 " D i s t r i c t A g r e e m e n t N o . 8 - 1 1 8 5 h a r m l e s s C O M M I S S I O N f r o m a l l c l a i m s , s u i t s o r a c t i o n s o f e v e r y n a m e , k i n d a n d d e s c r i p t i o n b r o u g h t f o r o r o n a c c o u n t o f i n j u r y ( a s d e f i n e d i n G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 8 1 0 . 8 ) o c c u r r i n g b y r e a s o n o f a n y t h i n g d o n e o r o m i t t e d t o b e d o n e b y S T A T E u n d e r o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h a n y w o r k , a u t h o r i t y o r j u r i s d i c t i o n d e l e g a t e d t o S T A T E u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t . ( 8 ) N o a l t e r a t i o n o r v a r i a t i o n o f t h e t e r m s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e v a l i d u n l e s s m a d e i n w r i t i n g a n d s i g n e d b y t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o a n d n o o r a l u n d e r s t a n d i n g o r a g r e e m e n t n o t i n c o r p o r a t e d h e r e i n s h a l l b e b i n d i n g o n a n y o f t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o . ( 9 ) S h o u l d a n y p o r t i o n o f S T U D Y b e f i n a n c e d w i t h F e d e r a l f u n d s o r S t a t e g a s t a x f u n d s , a l l a p p l i c a b l e l a w s , r e g u l a t i o n s a n d p o l i c i e s r e l a t i n g t o t h e u s e o f s u c h f u n d s s h a l l a p p l y , n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g o t h e r p r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . ( 1 0 ) S T A T E r e s e r v e s t h e r i g h t t o t e r m i n a t e t h i s A g r e e m e n t u p o n w r i t t e n n o t i c e t o C O M M I S S I O N . A t t h e t i m e o f t e r m i n a t i o n C O M M I S S I O N w i l l b e p a i d f o r w o r k a c c o m p l i s h e d a n d d e l i v e r e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e t e r m s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . A l l e n g i n e e r i n g a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l d o c u m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g r a w d a t a a n d d r a f t p l a n s , p r e p a r e d u p t o t h e t i m e o f t e r m i n a t i o n s h a l l b e c o m e p r o p e r t y o f S T A T E . ( 1 1 ) T h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l t e r m i n a t e u p o n a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i n a l P r o j e c t R e p o r t a n d t h e f i n a l E n v i r o n m e n t a l D o c u m e n t o r o n J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 7 , w h i c h e v e r i s e a r l i e r i n t i m e , u n l e s s a l l p a r t i e s a g r e e t o a n e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e . ( 1 2 ) F i n a l D e s i g n a n d C o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e a p p r o v e d a l i g n m e n t a s o u t l i n e d i n S T U D Y f o r S R 7 9 b e t w e e n D o m e n i g o n i P a r k w a y a n d t h e R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y w i l l b e t h e s u b j e c t o f s e p a r a t e f u t u r e a g r e e m e n t s . N O T E : S i g n a t u r e s a r e o n t h e f o l l o w i n g p a g e . 5 0 - 0 0 2 7 1 District Agreement No. 8-1185 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation JEFF MORALES Director of Transportation By: ANNE E. MAYER District 08 Director APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Attorney, Department of Transportation CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: District Budget Manager CERTIFIED AS TO FINANCIAL TERMS AND POLICIES: Accounting Administrator 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Chairman REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: Steven C. Debaum Best, Best and Krieger LLP Commission Counsel • 000272 AGENDA ITEM 7S RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Gustavo Quintero, Bechtel Project Coordinator THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-31-005 with DMJM + Harris for Additional Engineering Design Services for the State Route 60 HOV Project Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-31-005 (Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No. RO-2042) with DMJM + Harris to provide engineering design services for the SR 60 HOV Project Final Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E), for an additional base amount of $282,000; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its July 1999 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved the SR 60 HOV median - widening project. This Measure "A" and CMAQ funded widening project is located between Day Street and Redlands Boulevard in the City of Moreno Valley. At its February 9, 2000 meeting, the Commission awarded a final design contract value for $2,299,400 for the subject project to Holmes & Narver Infrastructure. At its April 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 1 for additional bridge design work for a base amount of $561,460. In addition, the Commission approved $40,000 of extra work funds. The total value of Amendment No. 1 approved by the Commission was for $601,460. At its June 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 2 to delete some of the bridge work and to add the preparation of Project Study Reports for the Indian Avenue, Nason Street and Moreno Beach Drive bridges for an additional amount of $44,290. Item 7S 000273 At its September 2001 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 3 to perform additional lead testing at the new sound wall locations and along the pavement area for a base amount of $64,712. Additionally, the Commission approved an additional amount of $20,000 in extra work funds. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,029,862. On January 31, 2002, Amendment No. 4 was executed to extend the life of the contract with DMJM + Harris for continuing work on the SR 60 HOV Project. The contract was extended from February 1, 2002 to December 1, 2003. At its March 13, 2002 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 5 to redesign the Perris Boulevard bridge, to add landscaping to the sound walls and to prepare a comprehensive Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to meet the requirements of Caltrans and the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board for a base amount of $270,000. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,299,862. During the June 12, 2002 meeting, the Commission approved Amendment No. 6 to complete various miscellaneous engineering designs such as detour profiles for Perris Boulevard undercrossing stage construction, right of way engineering and mapping, encroachment permit fees and utility pothole surveys for a base amount of $248,000. This brought the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,547,862. The proposed 1-215 Improvement "Design Sequencing" project includes seven construction projects that are currently in the planning and/or design phases. The last project in the design sequencing is the reconstruction of the East Junction to include two additional lanes. This project would close the HOV lane gap on SR 60 between the East Junction and Day Street. However, this project is currently not funded. Therefore, Caltrans requested that additional roadway improvements be constructed with the SR 60 HOV Project on the west end of the project. The improvements include minor outside widening and restriping to extend the number of available lanes between the East Junction and the SR 60 HOV project. DMJM + Harris has estimated that the cost to design the west end improvements and provide additional miscellaneous engineering design is for a base amount of $282,000. The proposed Amendment No. 8 will bring the total authorized not to exceed contract value to $3,829,862. Attached are two schematics identifying the proposed design changes. Staff supports the design concept as it will result in an improved transition for the ultimate improvements. However, adding additional scope to the project will likely impact existing contingency funds to the point of requiring additional funding to 0 • • Item, 7S 000274 " d e l i v e r t h e p r o j e c t . D u e t o t h e f a c t w e c u r r e n t l y d o n o t h a v e a p p r o v a l o f t h e p r o j e c t b y t h e S t a t e W a t e r Q u a l i t y C o n t r o l B o a r d s t a f f i s o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t a n y r e q u i r e d b u d g e t a d j u s t m e n t s h o u l d b e a d d r e s s e d j u s t p r i o r t o o r a t t h e t i m e o f a w a r d o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t s o t h a t a l l p r o j e c t c o s t s a r e k n o w n . S t a f f w i l l u s e t h e s t a n d a r d a g r e e m e n t f o r m a t , p u r s u a n t t o L e g a l C o u n s e l r e v i e w . F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t : N Y e a r : F Y 0 1 - 0 2 A m o u n t : $ 2 8 2 , 0 0 0 S o u r c e o f F u n d s : C M A Q a n d M e a s u r e " A " B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t : Y G L A N o . : 2 2 2 - 3 1 - 8 1 1 0 2 F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d : D a t e : 6 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 2 A t t a c h m e n t s : 1 ) A m e n d m e n t N o . 8 S c o p e a n d C o s t 2 ) W e s t e n d I m p r o v e m e n t s - W e s t b o u n d 3 ) W e s t e n d I m p r o v e m e n t s - E a s t b o u n d I t e m 7 S 0 0 0 2 7 5 _ DMJMG:Ht1IZRLS • June 14, 2002 Mr. Bill Hughes, Project Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 RE: SR 60 HOV LANES — RIV-60-KP19.6/32.8 - EA 463600 WEST END DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS ADDITIONAL TASKS FOR CONCEPTUAL SWPPP PROJECT MANAGEMENT Dear Mr. Hughes: • • DMJM+HARRIS (D+H) is pleased to submit this proposal to; (1) prepare plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) for the proposed west end improvements between the East Junction SR60/I-215 (East Junction) and Pigeon Pass Road, (2) perform additional work for the preparation of the Conceptual SWPPP and associated revisions to the Drainage Report; and (3) perform additional project management duties. A detailed scope of work (SOW) and proposed fee to perform these tasks are included below. I. WEST END DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS BACKGROUND The recently completed SR60 Truck Climbing Lane Project (EA 453001) constructed new pavement within the SR60 median from the East Junction to just west of the Pigeon Pass Road UC. The initial scope of work and design approach to the SR60 HOV Project was to join the newly constructed pavement at the terminus of the truck climbing lane project and construct new pavement within the median to Redlands Boulevard. It was initially agreed upon that the work west of Pigeon Pass Road would generally include striping work to accommodate the begin and end transitions of the eastbound and westbound HOV lanes, respectively; however pavement widening would not be included. D+H submitted a revised Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD) to Caltrans on September 17, 2001 which included proposed striping without outside widening west of Pigeon Pass Road. Caltrans reviewed the September 2001 GAD and requested revisions west of Pigeon Pass Road that would require; (1) approximately 950 linear meters of outside widening along eastbound SR60 between Day Street and Pigeon Pass Road and approximately 250 linear meters of outside widening along the eastbound SR60 Pigeon Pass Road Off -Ramp, and (2) approximately 550 linear meters of combined outside and inside widening along westbound SR60 between the westbound SR60 Day Street On -Ramp and the southbound I-215 Connector. Caltrans' proposed revisions are based on several factors, summarized as follows: 1. The proposed 1-215 Improvement "Design Sequencing" Project (EA 466900) includes seven construction projects that are currently in the planning and/or design phases. The last project in -1- AN AECOM COMPANY 000276 the design sequencing (EA 44930K) is the reconstruction of the East Junction to include two additional lanes. This project would close the HOV lane gap on SR60 between the East Junction and Day Street. However, Caltrans reported that this project is currently unfunded and is not included in the latest STIP. There is currently no available or anticipated funding for this project within the foreseeable future. Therefore, the improvements proposed under the SR60 HOV Project will be in place for a significant period of time. 2. In the eastbound direction, the originally proposed improvements (no outside widening) maintained the existing lane drop for the recently constructed Truck Climbing Lane and started the eastbound HOV lane just east of Pigeon Pass Road. This creates a "bottleneck" situation where three lanes are reduced to two lanes and then expanded to three lanes. This solution provided adequate length for trucks to transition out of the truck climbing lane and merge into the mixed flow lanes. This was generally acceptable as an interim condition because it was anticipated that the HOV gap closure phase of the design sequencing project would be constructed in the relatively near future to eliminate the bottleneck. Based on the information described in Item No. 1 above, the two lane bottleneck could be in place for an extended period of time; therefore, Caltrans' has proposed a design solution that would eliminate the two lane bottleneck. At the April 2, 2002 Project Development Team (PDT) Meeting, the PDT concurred that the Caltrans' proposed design approach would be implemented. 3. In the westbound direction, two elements significantly impact the SR60 HOV design approach west of Pigeon Pass Road. First, the City of Riverside has a current project in the PS&E phase that proposes a new westbound SR60 On -Ramp from Day Street. The schedule for construction and scope of this project needs to be considered for the design of the SR60 HOV Project so that there are no conflicting elements of the two projects and traffic operations are not impaired. Secondly, a westbound auxiliary lane is planned between the proposed westbound SR60 Day Street On -Ramp and the southbound I-215 Connector. This auxiliary lane would be constructed under the last phase of the I-215 Design Sequencing Project; therefore, there could be a significant time period before the auxiliary lane is in place. The improvements proposed by Caltrans would be independent of the westbound SR60 Day Street On -Ramp and the westbound auxiliary lane and would allow adequate traffic operations until the two future projects are implemented. Caltrans' proposed solution was developed to provide free -flowing traffic operations with minimal pavement widening. Exhibits showing the conceptual layout of the Caltrans' proposed eastbound and westbound improvements are attached hereto as Exhibit A. Preliminary construction costs for the proposed west end improvements are attached hereto as Exhibit B. SCOPE OF WORK Environmental Document Assumption: (1) No environmental work is included in this SOW. Geometric Approval Drawing- (GAD) and Supplemental Project Report (SPR) This SOW includes revisions to the GAD, the SPR Layout Plans and the SPR Cost Estimate to include the west end design improvements. This SOW also includes participation by our Project Engineer to attend two additional technical coordination meetings with Caltrans; one meeting to review and discuss -2- 000277 " t h e C a l t r a n s ' p r o p o s e d i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d o n e m e e t i n g t o p r e s e n t t h e r e v i s e d G A D a n d o b t a i n C a l t r a n s ' a p p r o v a l / s i g n a t u r e s . P S & E f o r W e s t b o u n d S R 6 0 B e t w e e n S o u t h b o u n d I - 2 1 5 C o n n e c t o r a n d D a y S t r e e t O n - R a m p R o a d w a y D e s i g n T h i s S O W i n c l u d e s 9 n e w s h e e t s ; 2 L a y o u t S h e e t s ( i n c l u d i n g d r a i n a g e ) , 2 P r o f i l e S h e e t s , 1 D r a i n a g e P r o f i l e / D e t a i l s S h e e t , 2 C o n t o u r G r a d i n g S h e e t s f o r t h e g r a d i n g r e q u i r e d t o a c c o m m o d a t e t h e o u t s i d e w i d e n i n g a n d 2 U t i l i t y S h e e t s . T h i s S O W a l s o i n c l u d e s r e v i s i o n s t o 1 T y p i c a l S e c t i o n S h e e t . A s s u m p t i o n : ( 1 ) N o r e t a i n i n g w a l l s a r e r e q u i r e d . T r a f f i c a n d S t a g e C o n s t r u c t i o n D e s i g n T h i s S O W i n c l u d e s 1 2 n e w s h e e t s ; 1 P a v e m e n t D e l i n e a t i o n P l a n , 3 S i g n P l a n s , 1 S i g n D e t a i l P l a n , 6 T r a f f i c H a n d l i n g P l a n s a n d 1 S t a g e C o n s t r u c t i o n T y p i c a l S e c t i o n S h e e t . T h i s S O W a l s o i n c l u d e s r e v i s i o n s t o 3 P a v e m e n t D e l i n e a t i o n P l a n s a n d 1 C o n s t r u c t i o n A r e a S i g n s P l a n . A s s u m p t i o n : ( 1 ) T w o s t a g e s o f c o n s t r u c t i o n . " E l e c t r i c a l a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n s D e s i g n T h i s S O W i n c l u d e s 6 n e w s h e e t s ; 2 L i g h t i n g P l a n s ( 1 l i g h t i n g a n d 1 c i r c u i t d i a g r a m ) f o r t h e r e l o c a t i o n o f a n e x i s t i n g o v e r h e a d s i g n s t r u c t u r e a n d l i g h t i n g a t t h e s o u t h b o u n d I - 2 1 5 C o n n e c t o r , a n d 4 C o m m u n i c a t i o n s P l a n s ( 3 f i b e r o p t i c b a c k b o n e l a y o u t a n d 1 d e t a i l ) f o r t h e r e l o c a t i o n o f a n e x i s t i n g f i b e r o p t i c b a c k b o n e l i n e a l o n g t h e e x i s t i n g e d g e o f s h o u l d e r o f t h e w e s t b o u n d l a n e s b e t w e e n t h e D a y S t r e e t O v e r c r o s s i n g a n d I - 2 1 5 F r e e w a y . T h i s S O W a l s o i n c l u d e s a n o p t i o n a l i t e m f o r a n e w o v e r h e a d s i g n s t r u c t u r e a n d a s s o c i a t e d l i g h t i n g l o c a t e d m i d w a y b e t w e e n t h e w e s t b o u n d S R 6 0 D a y S t r e e t O n - R a m p a n d t h e s o u t h b o u n d I - 2 1 5 C o n n e c t o r . T h e C a l t r a n s ' T r a f f i c M a n u a l r e q u i r e s o n e m o r e o v e r h e a d s i g n t h a n c u r r e n t l y e x i s t s a l o n g t h i s s e g m e n t o f S R 6 0 . T h i s o p t i o n a l t a s k w o u l d r e q u i r e a n a d d i t i o n a l 2 L i g h t i n g P l a n s . T h i s S O W a l s o i n c l u d e s a f i e l d r e v i e w t o v e r i f y a l l e x i s t i n g e l e c t r i c a l , l i g h t i n g a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n e l e m e n t s . A s s u m p t i o n s : ( 1 ) N o a d d i t i o n a l I T S i t e m s a r e i n c l u d e d . ( 2 ) N o w o r k i s r e q u i r e d a t t h e D a y S t r e e t O v e r c r o s s i n g . F i e l d S u r v e y T h i s S O W i s b a s e d o n o n e d a y o f f i e l d s u r v e y w i t h a t h r e e - p e r s o n s u r v e y c r e w , o n e d a y o f o f f i c e c a l c u l a t i o n s b y a s u r v e y t e c h n i c i a n a n d a Q A / Q C r e v i e w o f t h e s u r v e y c a l c u l a t i o n s b y a p r o j e c t m a n a g e r . T h e f i e l d d e s i g n s u r v e y i n c l u d e s c r o s s s e c t i o n s a t 2 0 - m e t e r i n t e r v a l s . T h i s S O W a l s o i n c l u d e s 1 . 5 d a y s o f c o n t r o l s u r v e y a n d a s s o c i a t e d r e s e a r c h o f C a l t r a n s r e c o r d s t o e s t a b l i s h h o r i z o n t a l a n d v e r t i c a l c o n t r o l f o r t h i s a r e a . T h i s i s r e q u i r e d b e c a u s e C a l t r a n s h a s n o t b e e n a b l e " t o p r o v i d e a n y d e f i n i t i v e i n f o r m a t i o n o n t h e s t a t u s o f t h e c e n t e r l i n e o f i m p r o v e m e n t s f r o m I - 2 1 5 t o P i g e o n P a s s R o a d . M e d i a n m o n u m e n t s w e r e m o s t l i k e l y l o s t o r d e s t r o y e d d u r i n g t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e - 3 - 0 0 0 2 7 8 Truck Climbing Lane Project. Shoulder monuments may exist; however, a survey will have to be performed to determine. Geotechnical A total of 8 shallow borings are proposed along the median and shoulder of the westbound freeway. The borings will be spaced at approximately 100 m apart. Of the 8 borings, 4 borings will be extended to a maximum depth of about 0.9 m for the sole purpose of collecting soil samples for ADL testing. The remaining 4 borings will be extended to a maximum depth of about 2.5 m for both pavement design and ADL testing. A Conventional hollow -stem auger drill rig will be used to advance the borings. Soil samples will be collected at depths of approximately 152, 305, 610, and 915 mm from all borings for lead content testing and large bulk samples will be collected for R -Value testing from pavement borings. The results of the work for this additional scope will be included as addenda to the Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) and Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) Testing Report that are presently being prepared by EMI for initial portion of the work. Assumptions: (1) No investigation of hazardous materials; if hazardous material is encountered during our field exploration, we will terminate our work and notify RCTC immediately. (2) Only shoulder closure will be necessary to perform the borings. Night drilling will not be required. (3) Lead Testing program will include, total lead testing of all ADL samples, soluble lead testing (California WET method using citrate) of 20% of all samples (assumed to contain more than 50 mg/kg and less than 1000 mg/kg of total lead), and pH testing of 10% of all samples. Based on our experience at the east end of the project, soluble lead testing using California WET method using deionized water (when there is more than 350 mg/kg of total lead) and soluble lead testing using TCLP method (when there is more than 1000 mg/kg of total lead) are not expected. PS&E for Eastbound SR60 Between Day Street On -Ramp and Pigeon Pass Road Roadway Design This SOW includes 8 new sheets; 3 Profile Sheets, 1 Drainage Profile/Details Sheet, 3 Contour Grading Sheets for the grading required to accommodate the outside widening and 1 Construction Detail Sheet to detail the gore area at the eastbound SR60 Off -Ramp to Pigeon Pass Road. This SOW also includes revisions to 3 Layout Sheets (including drainage) and 1 Typical Section Sheet. Assumption: (1) No retaining walls are required. Traffic and Stage Construction Design This SOW includes 3 new sheets; 2 Traffic Handling Plans and 1 Stage Construction Typical Section Sheet. This SOW also includes revisions to 4 Pavement Delineation Plans, 3 Sign Plans and 2 Traffic Handling Plans. Assumption: (1) One stage of construction. -4- 000279 " E l e c t r i c a l a n d C o m m u n i c a t i o n s D e s i g n T h i s S O W i n c l u d e s 2 n e w L i g h t i n g P l a n s ( o n e l i g h t i n g a n d o n e c i r c u i t d i a g r a m ) f o r t h e r e l o c a t i o n o f a n e x i s t i n g o v e r h e a d s i g n s t r u c t u r e a n d l i g h t i n g a t t h e P i g e o n P a s s R o a d O f f - R a m p . T h i s S O W a l s o i n c l u d e s r e v i s i o n s t o 2 C o m m u n i c a t i o n S y s t e m P l a n s f o r r e l o c a t i o n o f C C T V L o c a t i o n 2 . T h e r e i s a n e x i s t i n g f i b e r o p t i c t r u n k l i n e l o c a t e d a l o n g t h e c e n t e r m e d i a n b e t w e e n D a y S t r e e t a n d P i g e o n P a s s R o a d . T h e r e i s n o w o r k a l o n g t h e c e n t e r m e d i a n i n t h i s a r e a ; h e n c e , n o r e l o c a t i o n o f t h e c a b l e w i l l b e r e q u i r e d . A s s u m p t i o n s : ( 1 ) N o a d d i t i o n a l I T S i t e m s a r e i n c l u d e d . ( 2 ) N o w o r k i s r e q u i r e d a t t h e D a y S t r e e t O v e r c r o s s i n g . F i e l d S u r v e y T h i s S O W i s b a s e d o n t w o d a y s o f f i e l d s u r v e y w i t h a t h r e e - p e r s o n s u r v e y c r e w , o n e d a y o f o f f i c e c a l c u l a t i o n s b y a s u r v e y t e c h n i c i a n a n d a Q A / Q C r e v i e w o f t h e s u r v e y c a l c u l a t i o n s b y a p r o j e c t m a n a g e r . T h e f i e l d d e s i g n s u r v e y i n c l u d e s c r o s s s e c t i o n s a t 2 0 - m e t e r i n t e r v a l s . A s s u m p t i o n s : ( 1 ) C o n t r o l s u r v e y a n d a s s o c i a t e d r e s e a r c h a r e i n c l u d e d u n d e r t h e S O W f o r P S & E f o r W e s t b o u n d S R 6 0 B e t w e e n S o u t h b o u n d 1 - 2 1 5 C o n n e c t o r a n d D a y S t r e e t O n R a m p . " " G e o t e c h n i c a l A t o t a l o f 1 0 s h a l l o w b o r i n g s a r e p r o p o s e d a l o n g t h e s h o u l d e r o f t h e e a s t b o u n d f r e e w a y . T h e b o r i n g s w i l l b e s p a c e d a t a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 0 0 m a p a r t . O f t h e 1 0 b o r i n g s , 6 b o r i n g s w i l l b e e x t e n d e d t o a m a x i m u m d e p t h o f a b o u t 0 . 9 m f o r t h e s o l e p u r p o s e o f c o l l e c t i n g s o i l s a m p l e s f o r A D L t e s t i n g . T h e r e m a i n i n g 4 b o r i n g s w i l l b e e x t e n d e d t o a m a x i m u m d e p t h o f a b o u t 2 . 5 m f o r b o t h p a v e m e n t d e s i g n a n d A D L t e s t i n g . B o t h c o n v e n t i o n a l h o l l o w - s t e m a u g e r d r i l l r i g a n d h a n d - o p e r a t e d p o w e r a u g e r ( f o r t w o t o t h r e e b o r i n g s a l o n g E a s t b o u n d S R 6 0 j u s t w e s t o f P i g e o n P a s s R o a d ) w i l l b e u s e d t o a d v a n c e t h e b o r i n g s . S o i l s a m p l e s w i l l b e c o l l e c t e d a t d e p t h s o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 5 2 , 3 0 5 , 6 1 0 , a n d 9 1 5 m m f r o m a l l b o r i n g s f o r l e a d c o n t e n t t e s t i n g a n d l a r g e b u l k s a m p l e s w i l l b e c o l l e c t e d f o r R - V a l u e t e s t i n g f r o m p a v e m e n t b o r i n g s . T h e r e s u l t s o f t h e w o r k f o r t h i s a d d i t i o n a l s c o p e w i l l b e i n c l u d e d a s a d d e n d a t o t h e G e o t e c h n i c a l D e s i g n R e p o r t ( G D R ) a n d A e r i a l l y D e p o s i t e d L e a d ( A D L ) T e s t i n g R e p o r t t h a t a r e p r e s e n t l y b e i n g p r e p a r e d b y E M I f o r i n i t i a l p o r t i o n o f t h e w o r k . A s s u m p t i o n s : ( 1 ) N o i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s ; i f h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l i s e n c o u n t e r e d d u r i n g o u r f i e l d e x p l o r a t i o n , w e w i l l t e r m i n a t e o u r w o r k a n d n o t i f y R C T C i m m e d i a t e l y . ( 2 ) O n l y s h o u l d e r c l o s u r e w i l l b e n e c e s s a r y t o p e r f o r m t h e b o r i n g s . N i g h t d r i l l i n g w i l l n o t b e r e q u i r e d . ( 3 ) L e a d T e s t i n g p r o g r a m w i l l i n c l u d e , t o t a l l e a d t e s t i n g o f a l l A D L s a m p l e s , s o l u b l e l e a d t e s t i n g ( C a l i f o r n i a W E T m e t h o d u s i n g c i t r a t e ) o f 2 0 % o f a l l s a m p l e s ( a s s u m e d t o c o n t a i n m o r e t h a n 5 0 m g / k g a n d l e s s t h a n 1 0 0 0 m g / k g o f t o t a l l e a d ) , a n d p H t e s t i n g o f 1 0 % o f a l l s a m p l e s . B a s e d o n o u r e x p e r i e n c e a t t h e e a s t e n d o f t h e p r o j e c t , s o l u b l e l e a d t e s t i n g u s i n g C a l i f o r n i a W E T m e t h o d u s i n g d e i o n i z e d w a t e r ( w h e n t h e r e i s m o r e t h a n 3 5 0 m g / k g o f t o t a l l e a d ) a n d s o l u b l e l e a d t e s t i n g u s i n g T C L P m e t h o d ( w h e n t h e r e i s m o r e t h a n 1 0 0 0 m g / k g o f t o t a l l e a d ) a r e n o t e x p e c t e d . - 5 - Landscaping This SOW includes a total of 4 new sheets consisting of 2 Planting Plans and 2 Irrigation Plans. These plans are required for the existing landscaping along the outside edge and infield area of the Eastbound SR60 Off -Ramp at Pigeon Pass Road that will be disturbed by the proposed outside widening. FEE PROPOSAL The proposed fee for the west end design work is included below. A detailed breakdown of the sheet count for the west end design work is included in Exhibit C. A detailed breakdown of the following fee is included in Exhibit D. Fee Breakdown by Task GAD and SPR $ 6,174 Westbound SR60 PS&E Roadway $ 34,869 Traffic & Stage Construction $ 52,315 Electrical & Communications $ 21,845 Field Survey $ 9,671 Geotechnical $ 12,047 Subtotal Westbound SR60 PS&E $ 130,747 Eastbound SR60 PS&E Roadway $ 41,049 Traffic & Stage Construction $ 26,216 Electrical & Communications $ 9,060 Field Survey $ 7,453 Geotechnical $ 15,060 Landscaping $ 13,980 Subtotal Eastbound SR60 PS&E $ 112,818 Total Fee $ 249,739 II. ADDITIONAL TASKS FOR CONCEPTUAL SWPPP BACKGROUND The project is located in the San Jacinto watershed and drains to Canyon Lake, an impaired 303d -listed water body; therefore the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires a conceptual storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including a sampling and analysis plan and post -construction water quality best management practices. Because this is a relatively new requirement in California, there are a number of uncertainties and constraints associated with the design methodologies and with the design requirements that may be imposed by the jurisdictional agencies, particularly the RWQCB and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). These include: The RWQCB is requiring BMPs to treat the amount of runoff equivalent to the new pavement areas being added and is requiring calculations to show that the proposed BMPs do in fact accomplish that. Post -construction water quality BMPs approved by Caltrans for this purpose have been in a state of flux which has lead to delays and uncertainty in conducting design feasibility analyses. Late in the Fall of 000281 -6 " 2 0 0 1 , C a l t r a n s h a s n o w r e c o g n i z e d a n d a p p r o v e d t h e u s e o f b i o s w a l e s ( t h e D M J M + H A R R I S r e c o m m e n d e d B M P ) a s a p r e f e r r e d B M P , a l t h o u g h C a l t r a n s h a s n o t e s t a b l i s h e d a d e s i g n c r i t e r i a . D M J M + H A R R I S ' d e s i g n e f f o r t h a s b e e n a f f e c t e d b y t h e s e u n c e r t a i n t i e s a n d h a s e x p e n d e d e f f o r t n o t o r i g i n a l l y a n t i c i p a t e d . B e c a u s e t h e r e i s n o t a p p r o v e d d e s i g n c r i t e r i a , D M J M + H A R R I S r e s e a r c h e d d e s i g n c r i t e r i a f r o m s e v e r a l s t a t e s , a n d c h o s e o n e o f t h e m o r e c o n s e r v a t i v e d e s i g n s a n d a d a p t e d f o r u s e i n t h e S a n J a c i n t o W a t e r s h e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . I n p e r f o r m i n g t h e d e t a i l e d d r a i n a g e a n a l y s i s f o r t h e " w a t e r q u a l i t y " s t o r m t o i d e n t i f y a r e a s t h a t c u r r e n t l y m e e t b i o s w a l e d e s i g n c r i t e r i a a n d t h o s e t h a t r e q u i r e m o d i f i c a t i o n t o m e e t c r i t e r i a , D M J M + H A R R I S d i s c o v e r e d t h a t t h e C a l t r a n s r e q u i r e d c r i t e r i a t o d e v e l o p t h e p r o j e c t D r a i n a g e R e p o r t l a c k s s u f f i c i e n t d e t a i l t o m o d e l t h e w a t e r q u a l i t y s t o r m . S C O P E O F W O R K T h e S O W f o r a d d i t i o n a l S W P P P t a s k s i n c l u d e s t h e f o l l o w i n g : 1 . R e s e a r c h i n g v a r i o u s b i o s w a l e d e s i g n c r i t e r i a f r o m o t h e r U S s t a t e s a n d d e v e l o p i n g a n a p p r o p r i a t e b i o s w a l e d e s i g n c r i t e r i a t o b e u s e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t S W P P P . 2 . S e l e c t a p p r o p r i a t e c r i t e r i a f o r S a n J a c i n t o w a t e r s h e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s . 3 . R e v i s i n g t h e d r a i n a g e r e p o r t t o i n c l u d e t h e p o s t - c o n s t r u c t i o n w a t e r q u a l i t y B M P s a n d d e v e l o p i n g a d d i t i o n a l d r a i n a g e r u n o f f c a l c u l a t i o n s t o r e f l e c t w a t e r q u a l i t y s t o r m u s e d i n t h e S W P P P w a t e r q u a l i t y B M P d e s i g n . A s s u m p t i o n s : ( 1 ) T h i s S O W d o e s n o t i n c l u d e a d d i t i o n a l l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n p l a n s f o r t h e p o s t - c o n s t r u c t i o n w a t e r q u a l i t y B M P ' s . F E E P R O P O S A L T h e p r o p o s e d f e e f o r t h e a d d i t i o n a l S W P P P t a s k s i s $ 2 3 , 8 7 8 . A d e t a i l e d b r e a k d o w n o f t h e p r o p o s e d f e e i s i n c l u d e d i n E x h i b i t E . I I I . P R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T B A C K G R O U N D T h e o r i g i n a l S O W f o r P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t i s b a s e d o n t h e p r o j e c t s c h e d u l e i n E x h i b i t B o f t h e C o n t r a c t A g r e e m e n t ( A g r e e m e n t N o . R O - 2 0 4 2 ) . T h i s s c h e d u l e s h o w s a p r o j e c t c o m p l e t i o n i n M a y 2 0 0 2 . B a s e d o n t h e c u r r e n t p r o j e c t s t a t u s , w e a n t i c i p a t e t h e p r o j e c t d u r a t i o n t o c o n t i n u e t h r o u g h D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 2 . B a s e d o n t h e c u r r e n t s c h e d u l e , t h e p r o j e c t w i l l r e q u i r e s e v e n a d d i t i o n a l m o n t h s o f P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t d u t i e s t h a t w e r e n o t i n c l u d e d i n t h e o r i g i n a l S O W . R C T C r e c e n t l y a p p r o v e d C o n t r a c t , A m e n d m e n t N o . 6 , w h i c h i n c l u d e s f o u r o f t h e s e v e n r e q u i r e d a d d i t i o n a l m o n t h s o f P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t d u t i e s . T h i s p r o p o s a l i n c l u d e s t h e r e m a i n i n g t h r e e a d d i t i o n a l m o n t h s o f P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t d u t i e s . P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t d u t i e s i n c l u d e a t t e n d a n c e a t m o n t h l y P D T M e e t i n g s b y t h e P r o j e c t M a n a g e r , P r o j e c t " E n g i n e e r a n d o n e o t h e r k e y p r o j e c t p a r t i c i p a n t , a t t e n d a n c e a t p r o j e c t T e c h n i c a l M e e t i n g s b y t h e P r o j e c t - 7 Engineer, meeting preparation, project scheduling, preparation of meeting minutes and agendas, progress reports and coordination with the various participating' agencies and subconsultants. For purposes of estimating the proposed fee for the additional project management duties, we have assumed the following: Classification Duties Estimated Hours Per Month Project Manger Monthly PDT Meeting 3 Project Engineer Monthly PDT Meeting 3 Technical Meetings 2 Progress Reports 2 Agendas/Meeting Minutes 2 Coordination 2 Scheduling 2 Project Technical Director Monthly PDT Meeting 2 Total Hours Per Month 18 FEE PROPOSAL The proposed fee for three additional months of Project Management duties is $7,393. A detailed breakdown of these fees is included in Exhibit F. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, DMJrI+HARRIS Project Manager Victor j. Martinez, P.E. Cc: Gustavo Quintero • • 900283 8 REVISED DV .W.b 04 z 8 i 0 8 4 VO 0 W V BEGIN WORK BEGIN CONSTRUCTION • 4 -- a SIM Of CALIFORNIA- - �, �'' %y am-.- -�° :,'• ,. • ‘ 1�Ql ��rfi' 0� 1 �ii(R or �SyrT•� �., ,' ^;.:.. > ; i _ .({` Y 5 ;fit. i-,: a4+� ,♦ \.. I < ' .3--•.r_,:..s' .. �e :T.:1,.' i `a a. > ' :q.. '� 'nr.-C?✓•y4"";'�.1��•• •^'` .•'� . ry "� 14 • ` ` .-�-FL. \L-' - r,.-.•1�. a. .-.-,aR_uc..•�wv--•-- vz .jy' - aa'_. —�.._ :-.:.Za- s-�� '� .'., ._- • Via.\\ -•„� 1,0 CJI(rJ11S 0151 COUNT ROME 4ro'10Yf IiaO SC If y. Rio, 48/32, 06 OE RI 60 stria 1C01fTCRCO Cl'(((. C N01NE(R 1 I PLA MS A PPROY4l 041E *Ma CO1 MiT 1R(50.01 4TCN C04YKCW 3540 UN1Y(R511Y (4(446. 'wilt 100 RIYCR510(, C4k(f00N14 00501 CUJ11•Na 0lf 050 005 . i COWRY 0040 004 .CE, CA 50(i1 SKEET 0. Mt L ev r Ca( VYl4 r Ile rikre r owe. VW N a lar oWe . l e, e5 ewer rm:ov wd404* -d Id 4IOR V.S. (•. 1 Y • • •��Y�f' "•� T � 'i �Y :�� GY.' _��� ': � 'a�^R•:kf" y - >ti ;. -.!� V-w�'R.�: +=i / \;\\` 1 w' % �• ♦ , 'TA" YL OXT0TPl `L' lleriAl UIULII.ETI05 (S (5 1; lee Ir )1 0 100 •4. 8158 n5 401 ._ i 1rTPCI(50001 (r5 400 IS ROUT! 6o SECTION A.4 1N EXHIBIT A WEST, END DESIGN CONCEPT SCALE .010500 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FIGURE -1 E/ETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN 7o a co 4' . 1Nl\3426\o lon(\OAb\f16URE •1. o y1 • USER J;iuTm 1 CU 00000 1E4 467601 000284 S 4 W U� V W IM O 4 N N 85 NOIIIx Rn ,.. [e F�•? .,1,,,,�y� ... ' �q I. a •+- ..:.r. —ICJ.. ':i. . �.. [E..•�_i}� �. '"�„Axz.. �- �v.....k:.Lrn � j1 •_ k•^ � �s'� �� .s.e�,- +; ;.: ... 'i : u �'r , rfxr•_ . •fir ••., m--0.,i„�,;y �F• _l� ��,T44' 9 (( .� 11 y • 1'y. {it U^[ , -,_' .�'� .. ..i.�l 'f •' ...i �['J�-.y.� i 1 1 ij� i- NNI D L�'rf!' {•,.'11 .1._!F`•, �L,'A•1.,.� ,- • +'k{® 1 L ' 1� •�'r'S111 I 1 w ,,;10J .Ti^ _ I -L Y• I >m Cr I WV 1 AO. yLA0 4 11 FOG 1 LOO[1•163 I l 1s avR 6ac01 cc , _sS__ ROUTI 00 SECTION 6.5 •r{i1r 41.1 4512.11 iv wi L61NETER6 • Ol$II COUNT, Oe Ri v *0 I 60 A ILCv[1[R 702! S'W 520. 46/32, 76 .} REOISTCREO CIVIL .En5s n ( 1 PLANS M. RCV.L p.r! AnkArsO['COIMTr rRMYORT.IaI CONhiSi Cx' 1100 UNIVERSITY .vENUC . 5011 I00. 444246100, CALIFORNIA 92101 00411•[551411 969 TOO 6 CO UNTRY MAO 0RANGC. CA 92660 oief esv SAC ASE wIN +:£-951!21, 4+1.11.01 e) CIVIL J ll . pi s. o' Corp* go ' .. ♦ffs. 4. x0.'26 MOM* nevorWe11 20 no xo✓4 r m,W .W I RVMs4RN M Ir2 /M SW. • .711 ;it,1 i n X WEST ENDXDESIGN CONCEPT SCALE 11500 ALL 01141551055 ARE IN FIGURE -2 'AVERS UNLESS . OTNERwI SE 50005 7O [0 60 [0 Inn1426\pIOns GAO \6I CURE•2.aQn U3ER•> nusn o �CU 00000 Ea 467607 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-KP_ 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 Project Description:. State Route 60 HOV Lanes Limits: State Route 60 Between 60/215 East Junction and Redlands Boulevard. Proposed Add Two High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes Improvement (Scope): One in Each Direction by Inside Widening. WEST END IMPROVEMENTS - WESTBOUND AT SB 1-215 CONNECTOR (WITH OPTIONAL OVERHEAD SIGN STRUCTURE) ROADWAY ITEMS STRUCTURE ITEMS RIGHT OF WAY (Current Value) $ 609,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 609,000 Prepared by Hank T. Nguyen 714-567-2484 April 16, 2002 Name WestEnd_Construction cost.XLS Phone No. Date 000286 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-KP. 19.63-3183 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. ROADWAY ITEMS: Section 1 Earthwork Imported Borrow Clearing & Grubbing Roadway Excavation Section 2 Structural Section Quantity Unit Unit Price Unit Cost Section Cost HA 1,931 M3 - $- 9.00 $ 17,379 Subtotal Earthwork PCC Pavement (Sidewalk-100mm Thick) M2 $ Asphalt Concrete (Type A) 1,931 TONN $ 55.00 $ 106;205 Asphalt Concrete (Open Graded) TONN $ 50.00 $ Class 2 Aggregate Base 1,338 M3 $ 32.00 $ 42.816 Class 2 Aggregate Sub Base 1,606 M3 $ 22.00 $ 35,332 Construct Curb & Gutter M $ Construct Median Curb M $ Additional Roadway Cost Section 3 Drainage Removed Inlet Inlet Cap Inlet 450 mm Reinforced Concrete Pipe 450 mm Bituminus Coated CSP Miscellaneous Iron and Steel Concrete Collar Drainage Improvements 000287 LS Ea Ea Ea M M Kg Ea Subtotal Pavement Structural $ $ $ 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000 Subtotal Drainage 17,379 184,353 10,000 WestEnd_Construction_cost.XLS Page 2 EXHIBIT B PREUMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-KP. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 1. ROADWAY ITEMS (Cont'n) Section 4 Specialty Items Retaining Walls Sound Walls Concrete Barriers (Type 60) Guardrails Landscaping/Irrigation Modifications Erosion Control Storm Water Pollution Control Hazardous Waste Mitigation Work Environmental Mitigation Resident Engineer. Office Section 5 Traffic Items Quantity Unit Unit Price Unit Cost Section Cost LS $ 217,800.00 $ LS $3,301.000.00 $ M $ 120.00 $ M $ 65.00 $ LS $ 790,000.00 $ LS $ 660,000.00 $ LS $ 120,000.00 $ Subtotal Specialty Items Lighting and Electrical Systems 1 LS $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000 Ramp Metering Systems Ea $ 50,000.00 $ - Closed Circuit Television Systems Ea $ 20,000.00 $ Changeable Message Sign System Ea $ 50,000.00 $ - RL Traffic Monitoring Station 1 Ea $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000 Signing & Striping 1 LS $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000 Traffic Signal Modifications Ea $ 100,000.00 $ - RL Fiber Optic Conduit and Cable 800 M $ 82.00 $ 65,600 Traffic Control Systems 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000 Construction Area Sign LS $ 50,000.00 $ - Temporary Railing (Type K) 550 M $ 40.00 $ 22,000 Temporary Glare Screen 550 M $ 12.00 $ 6,600 Transportation Management Plan LS $ 100,000.00 $ - Portable Changeable Message Signs Ea $ 25,000.00 $ - RL Overhead Sign 1 Ea $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000 New Two Pole Overhead Sigrr(Option 1 Ea $ 110,000.00 $ 110.000 Subtotal Traffic Items 0 273,200 0002 4130/2002 WestEnd_Construction_cost.XL S EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (EXTRA ITEMS) 08-Riv-60-KP. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate_ SPR EA 08-225-463600 I. ROADWAY ITEMS (Other from page 3) Section 6 Removals Remove Curb & Gutter Remove Median Remove PCC Sidewalk Remove AC Pavement (Bridge Deck) Remove Traffic Stripe Remove Pavement Markers Quantity Unit Unit Price Unit Cost Section Cost M M2 LS 2,000 M 400 Ea 2.00 1.50 4,000 600 Subtotal Roadway Items: SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1-6 gar • 289 WestEnd_Const uction_cost.XLS Page 4 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-K.P. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 1 ROADWAY ITEMS (Cont'n) Section 6 Minor Item Subtotal Sections 1-6 Section 7 Roadway Mobilization Subtotal Sections 1-6 Minor Items Sum Unit Cost Section Cost 489,532. x (2%) $ 489,532 9,800 9,800 Total Minor Items 499,332 X (10%) $ 49,900 Section 8 Roadway Additions Supplemental Subtotal Section 1-6 $ 489,532 Minor Items $ 9,800 Sum $ 499,332 x (2%) $ 10,000 Contingencies Subtotal Sections 1-6 $ 489,532 Minor Items Total Roadway Mobilization Sum 9,800 $ 499,332 x (10%) $ 49,900 Total Roadway Additions 9,800 49,900 59,900 TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS (Total of Sections 1-8) 609,132 4/30/2002 WestEnd_Construction_cost_XLS EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-KP. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 Project Description: State Route 60 HOV Lanes Limits: State Route 60 Between 60/215 East Junction and Redlands. Boulevard. Proposed Add Two High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes, Improvement (Scope): One in Each Direction by Inside Widening. WEST END IMPROVEMENTS - EASTBOUND AT PIGEON PASS ROAD ROADWAY ITEMS STRUCTURE ITEMS RIGHT OF WAY (Current Value) $ 575,000 $ TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 575,000 Prepared by Hank T. Nguyen Name. 714-567-2484 April 17, 2002 Phone No. Date j 1 WestEnd_Constiuction cost.XLS Page 1 EXHIBIT B PREUMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS I. ROADWAY ITEMS: Section 1 Earthwork Imported Borrow Clearing & Grubbing Roadway Excavation Section 2 Structural Section 08-Riv-60-K.P. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 Quantity Unit Unit Price Unit Cost Section Cost HA 5,340 M3 $ 9.00 $ 48,060 Subtotal Earthwork PCC Pavement (Sidewalk-100mm Thick) M2 $ Asphalt Concrete (Type A) 2,748 TONN $ 55.00 $ 151,140 Asphalt Concrete (Open Graded) TONN $ 50.00 $ - Class 2 Aggregate Base 1,970 M3 $ 32.00 $ 63,040 Class 2 Aggregate Sub Base 2,288 M3 $ 22.00 $ 50,336 Construct Curb & Gutter M $ Construct Median Curb M $ Section 3 Drainage Subtotal Pavement Structural Removed Inlet Ea $ - Inlet Ea - $ Cap Inlet Ea $ - 450 mm Reinforced Concrete Pipe M $ - 450 mm Bituminus Coated CSP M $ Miscellaneous Iron and Steel Kg $ - Concrete Collar Ea $ - Drainage Improvements 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000 Subtotal Drainage 264,516 10,000 4/30/2002 WestEnd Constriction cost.xLS O 292 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-K.P. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 1. ROADWAY ITEMS (Cont'n) Section 4 Specialty Items Retaining Walls Sound Walls Concrete Barriers (Type 60) Guardrails Landscaping/Irrigation Modifications Erosion Control Storm Water Pollution Control. Hazardous Waste Mitigation Work Environmental Mitigation Resident Engineer Office Quantity Unit Unit Price Unit Cost Section Cost LS $ 217,800.00 $ LS $3,301,000.00 $ M $ 120.00 $ M $ 65.00 $ LS $ 790,000.00 $ LS $ 660,000.00 $ LS $ 120,000.00 $ Subtotal Specialty Items Section 5 Traffic Items Lighting and Electrical Systems 1 LS $ 25,000.00 $ 25.000 Ramp Metering Systems Ea $ 50,000.00 $ - Closed Circuit Television Systems Ea $ 20,000.00 $ Changeable Message Sign System Ea $ 50,000.00 $ Traffic Monitoring Station Ea $ 25,000.00 $ - Signing & Striping 1 LS $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000 Traffic Signal Modifications Ea $ 100,000.00 $ - Relocate Fiber Optic Conduit and Cable M $ 82.00 $ - Traffic Control Systems 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000 Construction Area Sign LS $ 50,000.00 $ Temporary Railing (Type K) 1,600 M $ 40.00 $ 64,000 Temporary Glare Screen 1,600 M $ 12.00 $ 19.200 Transportation Management Plan LS $ 100,000.00 $ Portable Changeable Message Signs Ea $ 25,000.00 $ Relocate OH Sign Structure 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000 Subtotal Traffic Items $ 135,200 WestF_nd_Construction_cost.XLS Page 3 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (EXTRA ITEMS) 08-Riv-60-K.P. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 L ROADWAY ITEMS (Other from page 3) Section 6 Removals Remove Curb & Gutter Remove Median Remove PCC Sidewalk Remove AC Pavement (Bridge Deck) Remove Traffic Stripe Remove Pavement Markers Quantity Unit Unit Price Unit Cost Section Cost 2,000 M2 LS M $ 400 Ea $ 2.00 $ 1.50 $ 4,000 600 Subtotal Roadway Items: SUBTOTAL SECTIONS 1-6 462,376 6/17/2002 WestEnd_Construction_cost.XLS Page 4 00,0:2'94 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 08-Riv-60-K.P. 19.63-32.83 (PM 12.2-20.4) Type of Estimate: SPR EA 08-225-463600 I. ROADWAY ITEMS (Conch) Section 6 Minor Item Subtotal Sections 1-6 Section 7 Roadway Mobilization Subtotal Sections 1-6 Minor Items Sum Section 8 Roadway Additions Supplemental Subtotal Section 1-6 $ 462.376 Minor Items $ 9,200 Sum $ 471,576 x (2%)'":. $ 9400 Unit Cost 462,376 x (2%) Section Cost $ 462.376 $ 9,200 9,200 Total Minor Items 471,576 x (10%) $ 47,200 Total Roadway Mobilization Contingencies Subtotal Sections 1-6 Minor Items Sum 462,376 9,200 $ 471.576 x (10%) 47,200 Total Roadway Additions TOTAL ROADWAY ITEMS (Total of Sections 1-8) 9,200 47,200 56,600 575,376 0 2'95 WestEnd_Construction_cost.XLS Page 5 EXHIBIT C SR60 HOV LANES PS&E SHEET COUNT ESTIMATE FOR WEST END Item Layout Sheets Typical Sections Profile Sheets Drainage Profiles/Details Contour Grading Plans Utility Plans Pavement Delineation Plans Sign Plans Sign Details Stage Construction Typical Sections Traffic Handling Plans Construction Area. Signs Electrical Plans Electrical Plans (Optional) Communication Plans Field Survey - Cross Sections Field Survey - Establish Control Materials Testing/Report SUBTOTAL: New Sheets No. 1 Hours/Sheet1 Hours Revised Sheets Total No. 1 Hours/Sheet Hours Hours Layout Sheets 0 3 30 90 90 Typical Sections 0 1 8 8 8 Profile Sheets 3 40 120 0 120 Drainage Profiles/Details 1 60 60 0 60 Contour Grading Plans 3 40 120 0 120 Construction Detail Sheets 1 50 50 0 50 Pavement Delineation Plans 0 4 16 64 64 Sign Plans 0 3 8 24 24 Stage Construction Typical Sections 1 40 40 0 40 Traffic Handling Plans 2 40 80 2 16 32 112 Electrical Plans 2 27 54 0 53 Communication Plans 2 21 42 42 Planting and Irrigation Plans 4 35 140 0 140 Field Survey Materials Testing/Report SUBTOTAL: 17 664 15 260 923 GRAND TOTALS: 2016 000296 EXHIBIT D WEST END DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS LABOR ESTIMATE TASK Project Manager Project Engineer Senior Engineer Sr CADD Designer Clerical TOTAL Revise GAD and SPR Revise Drawings (D+H) 1 12 32 45 Revise Construction Cost Estimate (D+H) 1 4 8 13 Subtotal GAD and SPR 2 16 40 0 0 58 PS&E for WB SR60 at SB 1-215 Connector Roadway/Drainage/Utilities (D+H) 8 48 156 156 18 386 Traffic & Stage Construction (CH2) 48 27 85 309 9 478 Electrical and Communication (KOA) 16 36 80 87 10 229 Subtotal WB SR60 PS&E 72 111 321 552 37 1093 PS&E for EB SR60 at Pigeon Pass Rd Roadway/Drainage/Utilities (D+H) 12 72 170 170 24 448 Traffic & Stage Construction (CH2) 23 12 48 152 5 240 Electrical and Communication (KOA) 8 16 32 35 4 95 Planting and Irrigation 8 24 48 48 12 140 Subtotal EB SR60 PS&E 43 100 250 357 33 923 Totals 117 227 611 909 70 2074 Q ? 9'7 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION NAME OF CONSULTANT DMJM+HARRIS TITLE OF PROJECT - AMENDMENT NO. 7 SR 60 HOV LANES - WEST END DESIGN Detail Description Estimated Hours (Average) Rate/Hour Total Estimated Cost ($) 1. DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET PROJECT MANAGER 22 $56.00 1,232.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 136 $44.00 5,984.00 SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER 366 $37.00 13,542.00 DESIGN ENGINEER 0 $32.00 0.00 DESIGN ENGINEER/SENIOR CADD TECHNICIAN 326 $27.00 8,802.00 CLERICAL 42 $20.00 840.00 TOTAL 892 ''>'.z`' $30,400.00 2. 1 INDIRECT COSTS Overhead G&.A-s i Burden r n Rate X Base = Burden ($) 144.45% $30,400.00 $43,912.80 $43,912.80 3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines I and 2) - $74,312.80 4. FIXED FEE OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 only) Percent X Base = Fee ($) 10.00% $74,312.80 $7,431.28 $7,431.28 TOTAL »:>'y-is: > s$<> ..............................................:.................... 3:>3`'3>> >>::>£':r�>ii%; $7,431.28 5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS PRINTING $247.00 TRAVEL $100.00 OVERNGHT MAIL/DELIVERY MISC (CADD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.) SUBCONSULTANTS CH2MHILL (Traffic and Stage Construction) $78,531.00 Earth Mechanics, Inc. (Geotechnical) $27,107.00 Associated Engineers (Surveying) $17,124.00 Lynn Capouya, Inc. $13,980.00 Katz Okitsu & Associates (Electrical and Communications) $30,906.00 The Culver Group Saf-R-Dig (Potholing) o 6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum -Of lines 3, 4 and 5) $249,739.00 i 6/14/2002 9:26 AM 00029:8 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION conmissION NAME OF CONSULTANT CH2M HILL TITLE OF PROJECT - AMENDMENT NO. 7 • SR 60 HOV LANES - WEST END DESIGN Detail Description Estimated Hours (Average) Rate/Hour Total Estimated Cost ($) 1. DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET PROJECT MANAGER 71 $53.00 3,763.00 SENIOR ENGINEER QA/QC REVIEWER 39 $58.00 2,262.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 133 $44.00 5,852.00 DESIGN ENGINEER 173 $37.00. 6,401.00 CADD TECHNICIAN 288 $27.00 7,776.00 CLERICAL 14 $20.00 280.00 TOTAL 718 z`: #z:«:::>`:::>:><:>:_>'z<>:_:z`z'. $26,334.00 2= INDIRECT COSTS Overhead G&A. s i BurdenRate X Base Burden •:. o' 171.10% $26,334.00 $45,057.47 $45,057.47 3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines 1 and 2) $71,39I.47 FIXED FEB. OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 only) Percent X Base = Fee ($) 10.00% 10.00% $71,391.47 $71,391.47 $7,139.15 $7,139.15 $7,11104. $7,13935 TOTAL :: r ; r:3r:'::a :3:i S'i i i:-': '' 'a $7,139.15 5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS PRINTING TRAVEL OVERNGHT MAIUDELIVERY MISC (CADD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.) SUBCONSULTANTS - 6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum of lines 3, 4 and 5) $78,531.00 6/14/2002 1:48 PM 0°0029`9 EXHIBIT " D" Katz, Okitsu & Associates RCTC HOV Rte 60 PS&ErExtra Work Fee Task Principal Engineer $47.30 Se nior Engineer $41.50 Associate E ngineer $35.00 Technician $26.50 Clerical $18.50 TOTAL TOTAL LABOR HOURS COST Overhead Profit Project Administration PS&E Fiber Optic Trun k Lin e Shts. 3 Sht. Cost $2,500 8 8 16 32 $1,270 $1,906 $318 Direct Costs 6 13 26 30 7 82 $2,658 $3,987 $664 $300 $7,609 $486 TO TAL COST $3,980 General & Project Notes 1 $2,25.0 2 4 8 9 2 25 Lighting 6 $2,250 10 23 47 53 13 146 Revised CCTV TOTAL HOUR S TO TAL COST 2 $1,750 3 6 13 14 3 39 $816 $4,718 $1,272 $1,224 $7,076 $1,909 $204 $1,179 $318 $0 $600 $0 $2,244 $13,573 $3,499 $16,101 $2,684 $1,386 $30,905 6/14/02 2;47 PM MV6OPSR_Cast2l,Xwk 000300 FROM : LYNN CAPOUYA INC FAX NO. : 9497560150 May. 01 2002 07:50AM P1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ADDITIONAL SERVICES PURCHASE ORDER date: April 30, 2002 to: Andrew Muth DMJM + HARRIS 999 Town & County Road Orange, Califomia 92868 re: SR 60 Widening, Moreno Valley, California Job Reference # 3426 LYNN CAPOUYA, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS will provide the following additional services beyond the contract scope pursuant to the terms of the original agreement. Description of Additional Services: 1. Add areas indicated on exhibit A. West end concept design. figures, and design package for planting and irrigation. (4 sheets) Authorized Per: ❑ Phone conversation with: 0 Meeting with: ❑ Transmitted documents: Andy Muth Requested Date of Completion: In conjuction with current project schedule. Estimated Cost of Additional Services: n on on April 29.2002 on 613,980.00 To be billed at hourly rates per base contract. Time being of the essence, we will begin your work at the first opportunity based on our initial request. Please execute and retum this order to our office at your earliest convenience as receipt of the form and any revised documents will serve as required written authorization to proceed as required per our agreement. Time of completion for the additional work will be in conjunction with established project schedule and receipt of written authorization. Respectfully submitted, Authorized by: Lynn Cai uya. Presiders .Name, Title Date LYNN C OUYA, INC. A California Corporation te,dicnes&peoieCt9Vr 1O b si ev 601ot1N9e.Ordervl.xl: 3822 CAMPUS DRIVE, SUITE 120 Qrs,� T BEACH, CALIFORNIA0 CA 92660 9497560150 99i 949 - 474-8119 FAX 02 08:59 P.01 949 - 756-0150 VOICE " E X H I B I T D T A B L E 1 . L A B O R H O U R A N D C O S T F O R P A V E M E N T D E S I G N A N D L E A D T E S T I N G L A B O R C O S T T A S K S P r o j e c t M a n a g e r S e n i o r P r o j e c t S t a f f / T e c h n i c i a n C l e r i c a l T O T A L P e r m i t , M a r k B o r e h o l e s & C l e a r U t i l i t i e s 2 0 0 2 4 0 $ 2 , 1 4 6 . 6 6 F i e l d E x p l o r a t i o n 1 0 . " 0 4 0 . , 0 $ 3 , 2 1 3 . 9 3 L a b o r a t o r y S o i l T e s t i n g 0 6 0 8 0 $ 1 , 3 1 2 . 2 8 P a v e m e n t A n a l y s e s / R e v i e w L e a d R e s u l t s 1 1 0 0 1 6 0 $ 2 , 5 4 6 . 9 3 A d d e n d a t o G D R & A D L R e p o r t 2 2 0 8 3 0 4 $ 5 , 8 3 9 . 8 0 R e s p o n s e s t o R e v i e w C o m m e n t s 0 2 0 2 0 $ 3 8 6 . 4 6 I n c o r p o r a t e i n t o F i n a l G D R & A D L R e p o r t 0 2 0 4 0 $ 5 3 9 . 3 6 P r o j e c t A d m i n i s t r a t i o n a n d M e e t i n g 4 0 0 0 0 $ 6 2 3 . 7 2 T o t a l H o u r s 1 0 4 0 . 8 1 2 4 4 1 8 6 H o u r l y R a t e ( I n c l u d e s 1 7 0 % 0 1 - I & 1 0 % F e e ) $ 1 5 5 . 9 3 $ 1 1 6 . 7 8 $ 9 1 . 3 0 $ 7 6 . 4 5 $ 4 . , 2 1 1 T o t a l D i r e c t L a b o r C o s t ( $ ) $ 1 , 5 5 9 . 3 0 $ 4 , 6 7 1 . 2 0 $ 7 3 0 . 4 0 $ 9 , 4 7 9 . 8 0 $ 1 6 8 . 4 4 $ 1 6 , 6 0 9 . 1 4 O T H E R D I R E C T E X P E N S E S ( O D C ' S ) D r i l l R i g R e n t a l ( 2 D a y s ) $ 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T r a f f i c C o n t r o l ( 2 D a y s ) $ 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 S o i l ( $ 3 , 2 0 0 ) a n d L e a d T e s t i n g ( $ 1 , 7 0 0 ) $ 4 , 9 0 0 . 0 0 i . g c ' . M i l e a g e , E x p . M a i l , I n s p e c t i o n F e e , a n d M i s c . $ 8 0 0 . 0 0 . . . : T o t a l O D C ' s , e $ . 1 0 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L C O S T $ 2 7 , 1 0 9 . 1 4 0 0 0 a c t 2 EXHIBIT D ASSOCIATED . ENGINEERS, INC. AE 00-13 RCTC SR60 HOV Lane Pr oject Design Surveys & Mapping - Cost Proposal 02/14/02 TASKS Project Manager Chief Mapper Land Surveyor " Survey Technician " CADD Technician " 3 -Man field Crew "" Chief of Surveys Clerical ' Proj Admin TOTAL HOU RS ODC Subtotals TOTAL COST Rates: $161.33 $122.92 , $89.63 $65.73 $62 .74 $276.46 $89.63 $46.09 $51.22 $0,00 SR60-215 WB connector (600m), and EB from Day to Pigeon Pass (1200m) 2 4 8 27 27 4 1 73 $11,180.25 o $Q00 o SDIT, $0,0d o 0 $0.00 o $0,00 0 $0.00 . o ,. $0 0o o $0:00 o $0,00 Total Hours 2 4 8 27 0 27 4 0 1 73 Total Costs $322.66 $491.68 $717.04 $1,774.71 $0 .00 $7,464.42 $358.52 $0 .00 $51,22 $0.00 $11,180.25 Indicates average rate Flom average rate (1) party chief (S ) + (2) chain man (S ) ODC Summary:, Photocopies Bliieline Prints Plan Size Xerox Deliveries (.. Aerial Mapping Consultant Right -of -Way Appraisal Consultant O:U cbNo12001‘00-131Co,t•SURV•2. 14-02. tlp 00003 $0.10/sht a $0. 42/sht $3.60/sht $20/ea Total Other Direct Costs: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 EXHIBIT E COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION (Yl>vrNrrccrnw NAME OF CONSULTANT DMJM+HARRIS �v~yv . TITLE OF PROJECT - AMENDMENT NO. 7 SR 60 HOV LANES - ADDITIONAL SWPPP Detail Description Estimated Hours (Average) Rate/Hour Total Estimated Cost ($) 1. DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET PROJECT MANAGER/TECHNICAL DIRECTOR 24 $55.00 1,320.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 32 $44.00 1,408.00 SENIOR DESIGN. ENGINEER/TECHNICAL WRITER 80 $40.00 3,200.00 DESIGN ENGINEER 72 $32.00 2,304.00 DESIGN ENGINEER/SENIOR CADD TECHNICIAN 24 - $27.00 648.00 CLERICAL 0 " $20.00 0.00 TOTAL 232 :........... $8,880.00 2. INDIRECT COSTS Overhead G&A-s i ( peC fY) Burden Rate X Base = Burden 144.45% $8,880.00 $12,827.16 $12,827.16 3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines 1 and 2) $21,707.16 4. FIXED FEE OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 only) Percent X Base = Fee ($) 10.00% $21,707.16 $2,170.72 $2,170.72. TOTAL .. _ $2,170.72 5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS PRINTING TRAVEL OVERNGHT MAIL/DELIVERY MISC (CADD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.) SUBCONSULTANTS CH2MHILL (Traffic and Stage Construction) _ Earth Mechanics, Inc. (Geotechnical) Associated Engineers (Surveying) Lynn Capouya, Inc. Katz Okitsu & Associates (Electrical and Communications) The Culver Group Saf-R-Dig (Potholing) 6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum of lines 3, 4 and 5) $23,878.00 604/2002 9:24 AM '000304 COST AND PRICE ANALYSIS EXHIBIT F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION NAME OF CONSULTANT DMJM+HARRIS TITLE OF PROJECT - AMENDMENT NO. 7 SR 60 IIOV LANES - PROJECT MANAGEME ll Detail Description Estimated Hours (Average) Rate/Hour Total Estimated Cost ($) 1. DIRECT LABOR (Specify) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET PROJECT MANAGER/TECHNICAL DIRECTOR 15 $65.00 975.00 PROJECT ENGINEER 39 $45.50 1,774.50 SENIOR DESIGN ENGINEER 0 $37.00 0.00 DESIGN ENGINEER 0 $32.00 0.00 DESIGN ENGINEER/SENIOR CADD TECHNICIAN 0 $27.00 0.00 CLERICAL 0 $20.00 0.00 TOTAL 54 <* $2,749.50 2. INDIRECT COSTS Overhead G&,A-s ci fY ( Pe ) Burden Ra e Rate X Base = Burden $ ..................•-- 144.45% $2,749.50 $3,971.65 $3,971.65 3. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR AND INDIRECT COSTS (Sum of lines 1 and 2) $6,721.15 FIXED FEE OR PROFIT (Specify, applies to line 3 only) Percent X Base = Fee ($) 10.00% 10.00% $6,721.15 $6,721.15 $672.12 $672.12 $6.4. $67 TOTAL > iii '"'< >;;••:: •:::::.;:.::::;:;:. ' $672.12 5. OTHER DIRECT COSTS PRINTING TRAVEL OVERNGHT MAIUDELIVERY MISC (CADD CHARGES, COMPUTER USAGE, ETC.) SUBCONSULTANTS - CH2MIILL (Traffic and Stage Construction) Earth Mechanics, Inc- (Geotechnical) Associated Engineers (Surveying) Lynn Capouya, Inc. Katz Okitsu & Associates (Electrical and Communications) The Culver Group Saf-R-Dig (Potholing) 6. TOTAL CONTRACT COST (Sum of lines 3, 4 and 5) $7,393.00 • 000305 6/14/2002 9:25 AM 0 • 0306 0007 • " A G E N D A I T E M 7 T " RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 03-33-003 with Engineering Resources for Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase II Parking Lot Expansion and Advertisement for Construction Bids BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 03-33-003 (Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 02-33-029) with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. to provide additional final PS&E design services for Phase II expansion of the parking lot at the existing Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink station, for an additional base amount of $114,705; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize staff to advertise bids for the construction of the Riverside - La Sierra Metrolink Station Phase II Parking Lot Expansion; and, 4) Bring back to the Commission the results of the bidding for contract award to the lowest, responsive bidder. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • At its May 9, 2001 meeting, the Commission approved the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee to address policy issues identified in the draft Station Management Plan submitted separately to the Commission at that same meeting. One of the main findings of the draft Station Management Plan was that by 2010, four out of the five, existing and proposed, Metrolink stations are forecasted to have parking deficits. In conjunction with direction from both the Commission and the newly formed Ad Hoc Committee, staff has continued to negotiate with several entities, to purchase additional right of way, for the possible expansion of the existing and proposed new parking for the Riverside -Downtown and Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink commuter rail stations. Item 7T 00`0308 At its September 10, 2001 meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a consultant to provide engineering, environmental and design services to develop and implement a Parking Lot Expansion Plan. At its November 14, 2001 meeting, the Commission approved the selection of and authorized the Chairman to enter into Agreement No. 02-33-029 with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. (ER), to provide engineering, environmental and design services for development and implementation of a Parking Lot Expansion Plan for the existing Riverside -Downtown and Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink stations for a base amount of $196,295 with a 20% extra work contingency of $38,705.00 for a total Agreement amount of $235,000. For the past six months ER has been working in cooperation with the City of Riverside, the Riverside Community College, and private property owners to develop the following parking lot expansion plans for the existing Riverside -La Sierra and Riverside -Downtown Metrolink stations. 1) Riverside -La Sierra For the expansion of the existing Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink station, RCTC has been in negotiations with the Riverside Community College (RCC) to purchase the entire 20 acre parcel which includes the property which RCTC currently leases from RCC for the existing Riverside -La Sierra Metrolink station. It has been mutually agreed by the City of Riverside Planning staff, RCC staff, and RCTC staff, to construct the additional parking for the Riverside -La Sierra station in two (2) phases: Phase 1: To ease the immediate parking problem at the Riverside -La Sierra station, RCTC staff working in conjunction with RCC, had previously developed, submitted, and received the City of Riverside's approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), on April 10, 2000, for a temporary parking lot, adjacent and to the west of the existing station. At the request of RCC, the plans for the temporary parking using the RCC property were abandoned and RCTC staff had to look for other ways to resolve the station parking at the Riverside -La Sierra station. RCTC staff subsequently negotiated with an adjacent bowling alley facility to provide additional parking. The adjacent bowling alley is still used for additional parking today at a cost of $1,725 per month and requires RTA to run special service to transport the passengers using this parking location back to the station platform. This auxiliary parking lot also requires the added cost of having a separate guard for security. • • " " " I n d i s c u s s i o n s w i t h t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e P l a n n i n g s t a f f , i t w a s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e p r e v i o u s l y a p p r o v e d C U P , f o r t h e R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a S t a t i o n T e m p o r a r y P a r k i n g . L o t E x p a n s i o n u s i n g t h e R C C p r o p e r t y , c o u l d b e r e s u r r e c t e d , a n d r e v i s e d t o a l l o w f o r a p e r m a n e n t e x p a n s i o n o f t h e p a r k i n g l o t a s l o n g a s t h e p e r m a n e n t f a c i l i t y w a s w i t h i n t h e f o o t p r i n t o f t h e p r e v i o u s l y a p p r o v e d t e m p o r a r y f a c i l i t y . T h i s w o u l d s a v e s e v e r a l m o n t h s i n g a i n i n g C i t y a p p r o v a l . T h i s a l o n g w i t h o t h e r m i t i g a t i n g i s s u e s p o s s i b l y r e q u i r i n g a p r o l o n g e d p e r i o d o f t i m e t o g a i n t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e a p p r o v a l , w a s t h e r e a s o n i n g b e h i n d s p l i t t i n g t h e R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t i n t w o ( 2 ) p h a s e s . T h e P h a s e 1 P e r m a n e n t P a r k i n g L o t r e v i s e d C U P w a s a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e i n M a r c h o f 2 0 0 2 . T h e P h a s e 1 p e r m a n e n t p a r k i n g a r e a w i l l p r o v i d e a n a d d i t i o n a l 2 5 4 p a r k i n g s p a c e s . T h e s t a t i o n c u r r e n t l y h a s 3 4 3 p a r k i n g s p a c e s . T h e P h a s e 1 p a r k i n g e x p a n s i o n w i l l b r i n g t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f s p a c e s t o 5 9 7 . S t a f f h a s b e e n w o r k i n g w i t h E n g i n e e r i n g R e s o u r c e s t o d e v e l o p t h e P l a n s , S p e c i f i c a t i o n s , a n d E s t i m a t e s ( P S & E ) f o r t h e P h a s e 1 R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t . T h e P S & E w a s s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e o n M a y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 f o r r e v i e w a n d c o m m e n t s . T h e P S & E p a c k a g e i s a d v e r t i s e d w i t h b i d s d u e o n J u l y 8 , 2 0 0 2 . C o n s t r u c t i o n i s e s t i m a t e d t o b e g i n b y A u g u s t 1 , 2 0 0 2 , a n d c o m p l e t e c o n s t r u c t i o n b y f a l l o f 2 0 0 2 . I n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h d e v e l o p i n g t h e d e s i g n f o r P h a s e I , s t a f f h a s b e e n c o o r d i n a t i n g w i t h t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e f o r t h e i n c l u s i o n o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a S o l a r P a n e l P a r k i n g S t a l l P r o j e c t w i t h t h e P h a s e 1 R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n C o n s t r u c t i o n P r o j e c t . P h a s e 1 1 : T h i s P h a s e w i l l p r o v i d e f o r a n a d d i t i o n a l 4 0 0 p a r k i n g s p a c e s . T h i s p h a s e w i l l r e q u i r e a n a d d i t i o n a l e n t r a n c e t o b e l o c a t e d a t t h e e a s t e n d o f t h e s t a t i o n a n d w i d e n i n g o f t h e e x i s t i n g I n d i a n a A v e n u e e n t r a n c e . P h a s e 1 1 w i l l b r i n g t h e t o t a l n u m b e r o f p a r k i n g s p a c e s t o 9 9 7 . 2 ) R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n E n g i n e e r i n g R e s o u r c e s h a s d e v e l o p e d t w o o p t i o n s f o r e x p a n d i n g t h e p a r k i n g l o t a t t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n . O p t i o n N o . 1 : D e v e l o p t h e e x i s t i n g R C T C ' s t r i a n g u l a r p r o p e r t y d i r e c t l y n o r t h a n d a d j a c e n t t o t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n s t a t i o n t e m p o r a r y p a r k i n g a r e a a c r o s s V i n e S t r e e t . T h i s . o p t i o n w i l l a d d a p p r o x i m a t e l y 1 2 5 t o 1 4 0 a d d i t i o n a l p a r k i n g s p a c e s f o r t h e s t a t i o n . T h i s o p t i o n c o u l d b e d e v e l o p e d a n d c o n s t r u c t e d v e r y q u i c k l y f o r a m i n i m u m c o s t . I t m u s t b e n o t e d t h a t t h i s R C T C p r o p e r t y i s a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e n e e d e d f o r t h e f u t u r e e x p a n s i o n o f S R 9 1 . I t i s c u r r e n t l y p r o j e c t e d t h a t t h e e x p a n s i o n o f S R 9 1 w i l l n o t o c c u r , i n t h i s a r e a , f o r a p e r i o d o f 5 y e a r s . I t e m 7 T 0 0 0 3 1 0 Option No. 2: The second option was to investigate the viability of purchasing and developing the properties along Tenth Street and Commerce Street, adjacent to the east end of the Riverside -Downtown station south side platform. This option would add approximately 390 to 430 additional surface parking spaces for the station. In a preliminary investigation of this option, it was also determined to be a viable option for a future parking structure that would serve the long term parking needs. RCTC staff is currently looking deeper into this option. In March of this year, staff directed Engineering Resources to proceed with the development of the preparation of a complete PS&E and other tasks related to the City of Riverside's design review process for Option No. 1. The PS&E was submitted to the City of Riverside on May 10, 2002 for review and comments. The PS&E package is complete and being advertised. Bids are due on July 8, 2002. Construction is estimated to begin by August 1, 2002, and complete construction by fall of 2002. Engineering Resources original scope of work was to provide preliminary engineering, environmental services, and design services for development and implementation of a Parking Lot Expansion Plan for the existing Riverside -La Sierra and Riverside -Downtown Metrolink station. Engineering Resources is nearing a completion of that task and the final PS&E design for Riverside -La Sierra Phase I and Riverside -Downtown Option No. 1. The following is a summary of the work Engineering Resources has completed to date: La Sierra Task #1 Phase I & 11 Conceptual Studies $20,000 Task #2 Phase I CUP Application $41,000 Task #3 Phase 1 Final PS&E Design $41,500 Task #4 Phase II CUP Application $13,000 Task #5 Phase I Solar Panel Conceptual Studies $12,000 Sub -Total Phase 1 & II $127,500 Downtown Riverside Task #1 Option #1 Conceptual Studies $ 5,000 Task #2 Option #1 Cultural Study $ 3,000 Task #3 Option #1 Final PS&E Design $40,000 Sub -Total $48,000 Total to Date $175,500 Authorized $196,295 Balance Remaining $20,795 • • • ; '• Itern 7T 000311 " " " 3 ) P r o p o s e d S c o p e o f w o r k t o C o n t i n u e E x p a n s i o n o f S t a t i o n P a r k i n g S t a f f r e q u e s t e d t h a t E n g i n e e r i n g R e s o u r c e s p r o v i d e s t a f f w i t h a s c o p e a n d c o s t o f s e r v i c e s f o r t h e R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a P h a s e I I f i n a l P S & E d e s i g n . S t a f f h a s c o n c l u d e d i t s n e g o t i a t i o n s w i t h E n g i n e e r i n g R e s o u r c e s a n d i s i n c o n c u r r e n c e w i t h t h e a t t a c h e d s c o p e o f w o r k a n d c o s t o f s e r v i c e s f o r t h e a d d i t i o n a l w o r k . T h e f o l l o w i n g i s a s u m m a r y o f t h e w o r k r e q u i r e d t o c o m p l e t e R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a P h a s e I I a s p a r t o f A m e n d m e n t # 1 t o A g r e e m e n t # 0 2 - 3 3 - 0 2 9 . T h e n e w t o t a l A g r e e m e n t a m o u n t w i l l b e $ 3 4 9 , 7 0 5 . T h i s t o t a l A g r e e m e n t v a l u e i n c l u d e s t h e p r e v i o u s l y a u t h o r i z e d c o n t i n g e n c y o f $ 3 8 , 7 0 5 , w h i c h r e m a i n s i n p l a c e . L a S i e r r a T a s k # 6 P h a s e I I F i n a l P S & E D e s i g n $ 9 5 , 0 0 0 T a s k # 7 P h a s e I S o l a r P a n e l F i n a l D e s i g n $ 1 6 , 0 0 0 P h a s e I & 1 1 A L T A S u r v e y $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 P h a s e I & I I B i o l o g i c a l S u r v e y $ 5 , 5 0 0 P h a s e I & I I R C C I m p o r t B o r r o w P l a n $ 6 , 0 0 0 S u b - T o t a l P h a s e I & I I $ 1 3 5 , 5 0 0 B a l a n c e f r o m P h a s e I $ 2 0 , 7 9 5 A d d i t i o n a l W o r k $ 1 1 4 , 7 0 5 I t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t t h e P S & E p a c k a g e f o r R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a P h a s e I I c o u l d b e r e a d y f o r a d v e r t i s e m e n t b y A u g u s t 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 . T h e E n g i n e e r ' s e s t i m a t e f o r t h e P h a s e I I P r o j e c t i s i n t h e r a n g e o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 1 , 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 t o $ 1 , 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 . B e c a u s e t h e r e w i l l b e n o C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g i n A u g u s t , s t a f f a t t h i s t i m e i s r e q u e s t i n g t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i z e s t a f f t o a d v e r t i s e f o r b i d s f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n P h a s e I I P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n . S t a f f w i l l b r i n g b a c k t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e b i d d i n g f o r c o n t r a c t a w a r d t o t h e l o w e s t , r e s p o n s i v e b i d d e r . A s p a r t o f t h e d e s i g n f o r P h a s e I , s t a f f c o o r d i n a t e d w i t h t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e f o r t h e i n c l u s i o n o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a S o l a r P a n e l P a r k i n g S t a l l P r o j e c t w i t h t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e P h a s e I P r o j e c t . S t a f f i s c u r r e n t l y w o r k i n g w i t h t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e t o d e t e r m i n e i f i t i s f i n a n c i a l l y f e a s i b l e t o i n c l u d e a s i m i l a r S o l a r P a n e l P a r k i n g S t a l l P r o j e c t w i t h t h e P h a s e I I P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t . I f i t i s f e a s i b l e , t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e S o l a r P a n e l P a r k i n g S t a l l P r o j e c t w i l l b e i n c l u d e d w i t h t h e P h a s e I I R i v e r s i d e - L a S i e r r a P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n C o n s t r u c t i o n P r o j e c t . T h e c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e S o l a r P a n e l P a r k i n g S t a l l p r o j e c t w i l l b e r e i m b u r s e d t o R C T C t h r o u g h a M e m o r a n d u m o f U n d e r s t a n d i n g ( M O U ) , w h i c h S t a f f i s c u r r e n t l y d e v e l o p i n g . T h e E n g i n e e r ' s e s t i m a t e f o r t h e P h a s e I I P r o j e c t w i t h t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e S o l a r P a n e l P r o j e c t i s i n t h e r a n g e o f a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 3 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 t o $ 3 , 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 . I t e m 7 T 0 ; 0 0 3 ; " 1 . 2 Staff will use the standard agreement format, pursuant to Legal Counsel review to amend the agreement with Engineering Resources. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 02-03 Amount: $114,705 Source of Funds: Measure "A" Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 221- 33- 81 101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 6/18/2002 Attachment: Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. letter to Karl Sauer dated April 22, 2002; regarding La Sierra Commuter Rail Station Parking Expansion Expanded Work Plan — Task 6 Final Design Services and Task 7 Extra Services • • NGINEERING ESOURCES OF SWUM CAUFORNULMC. 411 97.009.003 April 22, 2002 Mr. Karl Sauer RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: La Sierra Commuter Rail Station Parking Expansion Expanded Work Plan - .Task 6 Final Design Services & Task 7 Extra Services Dear Karl, The following items will be designated Task 6 - Final Design Services for Parking Expansion. This task will advance the site plan as submitted for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the ultimate 1000± parking stalls (Phase 2) through the City of Riverside Design Review application process and the preparation of construction documents. • The following scope items have been developed for Task 6: Task 6 - Final Design Services for Parking Expansion (Phase 2) Budget 1. Prepare and submit Phase 2 site plans and document for the City of Riverside Design Review Process. Attend meetings with City staff and attend the Design Review meeting. $ 3,500.00 2. Preparation of a geoteclmical report update by Diaz-Yourman & Associates. They will update their previous report prepared for the pedestrian over crossing and the previous geotechnical report prepared for the original station and include general grading recommendation, pavement structural section recommendations and footing design recommendations. $ 2,500.00 3. Prepare civil construction documents and supporting calculations to include: Title Sheet (1) Notes/Abbreviations Sheet (1) $ 55,000.00 1820 COMMERCENTER CIRCLE, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92408-3430 PHONE (909) 890-1255 - FAX (909) 890-0995 April 22, 2002 Mr. Karl Sauer Page 2 Existing Conditions Sheet (I) Demolition Plan (1) Site Development Plan (1) Horizontal Control Plan (I) Grading Plans (2) . Entrance Roadway Plan (1) • Private Storm Drain Modification Plans (3) Parking Lot Improvement and Striping Plan (1) Indiana Street Improvement Plans (2) Traffic Signal Modification Plan (Indiana & La Sierra) (1) Construction Phasing Plans (2) Project Specifications Hydrology study to confirm Indiana flows from the south and compliance with the La Sierra Specific Plan Drainage Report. 4. Prepare electrical construction documents to include: Notes/Abbreviations Sheet (1) Electrical Panel Modifications and Upgrades (1) Lighting System Layouts (2) Lighting Details (1) Construction Phasing Plan (1) Mark Balan & Associates will be the electrical engineering consultant. $ 14,000.00 5. Prepare landscape & irrigation construction documents to include: Note/Abbreviations sheet (1) Planting Plans (3) Irrigation Plans (3) Irrigation Reconfiguration Plan (2) Construction Phasing Plan (1) Lynn Capouya Inc. will be the landscape architecture consultant. Plans are for the on -site parking area and entry roadway. $ 15,000.00 6. Project Management and coordination with city departments and utility agencies. $ 5,000.00 TASK 6 BUDGET $ 95,000.00 000315 April 22, 2002 Mr. Karl Sauer Page 3 Additional services not contained in the scope of the original contract are necessary to complete the project. These additional services will be designated Task 7 - Extra Services. These services are for the final design of the solar generation facilities and the associated solar panel carports for Phase 1, the preparation of an ALTA Survey for the 20 acre parcel, the biological survey for the 20 acre site, and the preparation of grading plans and environmental studies for the borrow site on the adjacent RCC property, and. The following scope items have been developed for Task 7: Task 7 - Extra Services Budget 1. Phase 1 Solar Power Generation Facilities and Solar Panel Carports- Provide design engineering for the preparation of construction documents and support calculations for the solar generation facilities and electrical components as well as structural supports and footings. Mark Balan & Associates will be the electrical engineering consultant. $ 16,000.00 2. Perform a boundary survey of the 20± acre $ 13,000.00 site and prepare an ALTA (American Land Title Association) Survey for the site. Title documents will be provided by RCTC. This item assumes a Record of Survey and boundary monumentation will be required by provisions of the Land Surveyors Act. 3. Perform biological survey and data base search. Survey will include observations for the Borrowing Owl over a time period of five weeks. Prepare report on the findings. $ 5,500.00 4. Prepare grading plans for borrow site located on the adjacent RCC site. This may include an environmental component as required by $ 6,000.00 the City: TASK 7 BUDGET $ 40,500.00 For accounting purposes, Task 5 for the Solar Power Generation Facilities as previously submitted should also be identified as an extra service. If you need any further information or have questions of the above you can contact me at 909-890 -1255 extension 222. 0003.16 April 22, 2002 Mr. Karl Sauer Page 4 Sincerely, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. Terrance A. Lane, P.E. Principal Engineer C:\Docmnents and Settings \TerrylMyFiles\EugrR sources\Project Files\RCTC\97009003 Metrolink Parking Expansion\Work Plan & Tasks\L a Siena Scope Work Plan Task 6 042202.wpd 000317 AGENDA ITEM 7U • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2003-2007 Measure "A" Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the FY 03-07 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive their Measure "A" disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. On April 22, 2002, RCTC staff provided the local agencies with Measure "A" revenue projections for local streets and roads to assist them in preparation of the required Five -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The agencies were asked to submit their plans by June 14 for submission to the Budget and Implementation Committee at its June 24, 2002 meeting and to the Commission on July 10, 2002. To date, we have received the required Plan, MOE certification and supporting documentation from the following local agencies in the county: Western County Banning Calimesa Corona Hemet Lake Elsinore Moreno Valley Murrieta Item 7U Norco Perris Riverside Riverside Co. San Jacinto Temecula Coachella Valley Desert Hot Springs Blythe Indian Wells Palm Desert Palm Springs Palo Verde Valley 00031 The five (5) cities that have not submitted all of the required documents include: Beaumont, Cathedral City, Coachella, Indio, and Rancho Mirage. Commission staff has informed city staff that no disbursement of Measure "A" funds for local streets and roads will be made until all of the required documents are received and approved by the Commission. Canyon Lake is not required to submit a Five -Year Plan because of a prior loan agreement with the Commission. The City of La Quinta does not receive Measure "A" funds because they do not participate in CVAG's TUMF program. Attachments: Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans • Item 7U '000319 WESTERN COUNTY 000320 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 Agency: Prepared By: Phone No. Date: City of Banning Ann Marie Loconte (909) 922-3130 June 3, 2002 Citywide Street 1 '/2" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2003 STREET LOCATION - FROM / TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND . ($1,000) 1. Wesley St. - San Gorgonio Ave. to Hargrave St. 60 60 2. Westward Ave. — 22" St. to 4`h St. 108 108 3. Cherokee Circle — North of Jefferson St. 6 6 4.: Sioux Circle - North of Jefferson St. 6 6 5. Mohawk Road — Soboba Dr. to Navajo Dr. -_ : 17 17 6. Soboba Dr. — Mohawk St. to Jefferson St. 6 6 7. Jefferson St. — Sunset Ave. to Navajo Dr. 20 20 8. Cheyenne Dr. — North of Jefferson St. 5 5 9. Navajo Dr. — Lincoln St. to Jefferson St. 6 6 10. King St. — 8`h St. to 4`h St. 25 25 11. George St. — 16th St. to 12`h St. 30 30 12. Durward St — Indian School Ln. to Santa Rita P1 25 25 13. 4th St. — George St. to Wilson St. 15 15 14. Barbour St. — Hargrave St. to Hathaway St. 50 50 15. Alessandro Rd. — George St. to Hoffer St. 45 45 16: Hoffer. St. =15St. to Florida St. 55 55 17. Ramsey St. - Median Design from Sunset Ave. to 22"d Street 75 .. .- 75 . - TOTAL 554 554 000321 Citywide Street 1 %2" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2004-2007 STREET LOCATION - FROM / TO TOTAL COST . ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 1. Westward Ave. - Sunset Ave. to Highland Home Rd. 200 200 2. Brinton St. - Gilman St. to Hoffer St. 17 17 3. Wesley St. - San Gorgonio Ave. to Hargrave St. 40 40 4. John St. - East of Hargrave St. to Dead End 55 55 5. 4th St. - Williams St. to George St. 30 30 6. Barbour St. - Hargrave St. to Hathaway St. 45 45 7. Alessandro Rd. - George St. to Wilson St. 25 25 8. Hargrave St. - Lincoln St. to RR Xing 15 15 9. Sunrise Ave. - Williams St. to Wilson St. 30 30 10. GilmanSt. -11thSt. to8th St. 18 18 11. Pendleton Rd. - San Gorgonio Ave. to Ripley Way 11 11 12. Ripley Way - Pendleton Rd. to Lancaster Rd. 8 8 13. Florida St. - Wilson St. to Hoffer St. 15 15 14. 4th St. - Westward Ave. to Lincoln St. 20 20 15. 8t St. - Barbour St. to Lincoln St. 12 12 16. Williams St. - Allen St. to Hathaway St. 16 16 17. Sun Lakes Blvd. - Highland Springs Ave.. ta Highland Home Road 32 32 18. Williams St. - 16th St. to Sunset Ave. 100 100 19. Nicolet St. - 4th St. to 8th St. 40 40 20. Nicolet St. - 12th St. to Sims St. 35 35 21. 4th St. - 4th Pl. to Indian School Ln. 30 30 22. George St. - 6th St. to San Gorgonio Ave. 40 40 23. George St. - Blanchard St. to Hathaway St. 25 25 24. Cherry St. - Nicolet St. to George St. 15 15 25. 21st St. - Roberge Ave. to Ramsey St. 3 3 26. Geneva St. - 21St St. to Nicolet St. 13 13 27. 4th St. - Williams St. to George St. 35 35 28. 5th St. - Williams St. to George St. 19 19 29. Altura St. - North of George St. 8 8 30. Jefferson St. - East of 22nd St. to Dead End 11 11 31. Monroe St. - 22nd St. to Jefferson St. 12 12 32. San Andreas Rd. - Durward St. to Florida St. 15 15 33. King St. - West of Kingswell Ave. 4 4 34. Omar St. - Ramsey St. to Wilson St. 80 80 35. Wilson St. - Highland Spgs. Ave. to Dysart Dr. 236 236 36. Hoffer St. - lst St. to Phillips Ave. 60 60 37. Nicolet St. - McGovern Ave. to Sims St., 12th St. to 8th St. 130 130 00 On 2 " C i t y w i d e S t r e e t 1 % 2 " A s p h a l t i c C o n c r e t e ( A . C . ) O v e r l a y P r o g r a m I T E M N O . Y E A R 2 0 0 4 - 2 0 0 7 S T R E E T L O C A T I O N S - F R O M / T O T O T A L C O S T ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) M E A S U R E " A " F U N D ( $ 1 , 0 0 0 ) 3 8 . M u r r a y S t . - W i l s o n S t . t o H o f f e r S t . 1 0 1 0 3 9 . M u r r a y S t . - G i l m a n S t . t o T h e o d o r e S t . 1 1 1 1 4 0 . 1 2 t h S t . - W i l l i a m s S t . t o G e o r g e S t . 2 0 2 0 4 1 . 1 4 ' ' ' S t . - W i l l i a m s S t . t o G e o r g e S t . 2 0 2 0 4 2 . G e o r g e S t . - W o o d l a n d A v e . t o M o r o n g o A v e . 2 9 2 9 4 3 . H a r g r a v e S t . - C h a r l e s S t . t o P o r t e r S t . ( R i v . C o . ) 3 0 3 0 4 4 . . 4 ` h S t . - W i l l i a m s S t . t o G e o r g e S t . 3 5 3 5 4 5 . 5 t h S t . - W i l l i a m s S t . t o G e o r g e S t . 1 9 1 9 4 6 . 7 t h S t . - S o u t h o f W i l l i a m s S t . 5 5 4 7 . B l a n c h a r d S t . - H o f f e r S t . t o G e o r g e S t . 6 6 4 8 . 1 0 t h S t - G e o r g e S t . t o W i l s o n S t . 1 0 1 0 4 9 . D o r o t h y A n n a D r . - W i l s o n S t . t o N o r t h D e a d E n d 2 3 2 3 5 0 . G i l m a n S t . - H i g h l a n d H o m e R d . t o D y s a r t D r . 9 9 5 1 . D y s a r t D r . - W i l s o n S t . t o N o r t h D e a d E n d 2 3 2 3 5 2 . E l s i e L e e C r . - W e s t o f D o r o t h y A n n a D r . 6 6 5 3 . H o f f e r S t . - H i g h l a n d H o m e R d . t o E a s t D e a d E n d 2 1 . 2 1 5 4 . S u n s e t A v e . : - R R c r o s s i n g t o L i n c o l n S t . 3 0 . 3 0 . 5 5 . M o r o n g o A v e . - R a m s e y S t . t o G e o r g e S t . 4 0 4 0 5 6 . 1 2 t h S t . - B a r b o u r S t . t o L i n c o l n S t . 5 5 5 7 . 2 3 r d S t . - N o r t h o f L i n c o l n S t . 8 8 5 8 . W e s l e y S t . - H a r g r a v e S t . t o E a s t o f H a t h a w a y S t . 6 0 6 0 5 9 . A d a m s S t . - N o r t h o f L i n c o l n S t . 2 2 6 0 . H e r m o s a S t . - W e s l e y S t . t o V i c t o r y S t . 1 0 1 0 6 1 . F l o r i d a S t . - W e s l e y S t . t o V i c t o r y S t . 8 8 6 2 . V i c t o r y S t . - E a s t o f H e r m o s a S t . t o W e s t o f F l o r i d a S t . 1 0 1 0 6 3 . F l o r i d a S t . - S a n A n d r e a s R d . t o N o r t h o f L o m b a r d y L a n e 1 6 1 6 6 4 . S u n s e t - R R c r o s s i n g t o W i l s o n S t . 6 0 6 0 6 5 . H a r g r a v e S t . - R a m s e y S t . t o R R c r o s s i n g 5 5 6 6 . O r e g o n T r a i l - W i l s o n S t . t o R e d B l u f f L n . 3 2 3 2 6 7 . R e d B l u f f L n . - O r e g o n T r a i l t o A s p e n L n . 1 5 1 5 6 8 . A s p e n L n . - R e d B l u f f L n . t o W h i t e O a k D r i v e 2 1 2 1 6 9 . W h i t e O a k D r . - O r e g o n T r a i l t o A s p e n L n . 1 5 1 5 7 0 . H o l l y C o u r t - W h i t e O a k D r . t o D e a d E n d 8 8 7 1 . S u g a r P i n e - O r e g o n T r a i l t o A s p e n L n . 1 2 1 2 7 2 . J u n i p e r P l . - S u g a r P i n e t o D e a d E n d 1 0 1 0 7 3 . " G " C o u r t - R e d B l u f f L n . t o D e a d E n d 4 4 7 4 . S t a r g a z e W y . - W i l s o n S t . t o M o o n b e a m D r . 3 3 7 5 . S t a r l i g h t C o u r t - M o o n b e a m D r . t o N o r t h D e a d E n d 8 8 0 0 0 3 2 3 Citywide Street 1 'A" Asphaltic Concrete (A.C.) Overlay Program ITEM NO. YEAR 2004-2007 STREET LOCATIONS — FROM/TO TOTAL COST ($1,000) MEASURE "A" FUND ($1,000) 76. Harvest Moon Ln. — Moonbeam Dr. to Silver Star Dr. 18 18 77. Moonbeam Dr. — Stargaze Wy. to Harvest Moon Ln. 12 12 78. Sunrise Ave. — Wilson St. to Lunar Ln. 9 9 79. Highland Home Rd. — Ramsey St. to Wilson St. 40 40 80. Gilman St. — Linda Vista Dr. to Hibiscus Ct. 33 33 81. Ramsey St. - Drainage Improvements 300 300 TOTAL 2571 2571 NOTE: Priority of Street locations to be paved will be determined by the City Council at the award of the construction contract. _000324 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002 - 2003 PAGE 1 OF 5 AGENCY: CITY OF CALIMESA Prepared by: Elroy Kiepke Phone No,: 909-795-9801 Date: June 14, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Location Project type Total Cost (000's) Measure A Funds (000's) 1 Various Streets City Wide Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay as needed $134 $134 2 Administrative Charge Overhead $12 $12 Total Measure "A" Funds $146,000 000325 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2004 PAGE2OF5 AGENCY: CITY OF CALIMESA Prepared by: Elroy Kiepke Phone No. : 909-795-9801 Date: June 14, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Location Pr oject type Total Cost (000's) Measure A Funds (000's) 1 Various Streets City Wide Re move, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay as needed $147 $147 2 Administrative Charge Overhead $13 $13 Total Measure "A" Funds $160,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2004 - 2005 PAGE 3OF5 AGENCY: CITY OF CALIMESA Prepared by: Elroy Kiepke Phone No,: 909-795-9801 Date: June 14, 2002 Item No, Project Name/Location Project type Total Cost (000's) $155 Measure A Funds (000's) $155 1 Various Streets City Wide Remo ve, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay as needed 2 Administrative Charge Overhead $13 $13 Total Measure "A" Funds $168,000 • 000327 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2005 - 2006 PAGE4OF5 AGENCY: CITY OF CALIMESA Prepared by: Elroy Kiepke Phone No.: 909.795-9801 Date: June 14, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Location Project type Total Cost (000's) Measure A Funds (000's) 1 Various Streets City Wide Remove, Repair, Cr ack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay as needed $156 $156 2 Administrative Charge Overhead $14 $14 Total Measure "A" Funds $170,000 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2006 - 2007 AGENCY: CITY OF CALIMESA Prepared by: Elroy Kiepke Phone No.: 909-795-9801 Date: June 14, 2002 PAGE5OF5 Item No. Project Name/Location Project type Total Cost (000's) $167 Measure A Funds (000's) $167 1 Various Streets City Wide Remove, Repair, Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay as needed 2 Administrative Charge Overhead $15 $15 Total Measure "A"Funds $182,000, 000329 JUN -14-2002 09:42AM Prepared fiy: Pho ne JVo .: Dale: City of Corona Reza (909) 739-2441 Arne 14,1002 RIVERSIDE CO UNTY TRIAIIORTATION COM11ESSIO? MEASURE "A "LO CAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2002/03 - 2006/07 P age 1 of S Fiscal Ye ar 2001-2003 FY 2002-2063 11, E E0 .0 A ITEM NE►VAP PROPRL4TIONS EN77TLl ►f ENTN NO . .PROJECT NAME/ LIMITS PROJECT (Category) TYPE TOTAL COST Est FY 2002-2003 1 Pavement Rehabilitation. for Local Streets- AB2928 Roads, Bridges and Freeways $ 641,536 $ 641,536 2 Bedford Canyon Realignment Roads, Bridges and Freeways 600,000 100,000 3 Third Street lmprovernent and ROW Acquisitions Roads, Bridges and Freeways 200,000 2 .00,000 4 Major Pavement Rehabilitation Roads. Bridges and Freeways 1,466,784 576,784 5 Arterial Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways 150,000 150,000 6 Magnolia/1-15 Interchange Improvements Roads, Bridges and Freeways 500,000 500,000 7 Citywide GIS Application Building, Systems, and Facilities 7,816 7,816 8 Freeway Bridges/Smith A venue Stomp Drain Roads, Bridges and Freeways 532,648 532,648 9 Harrison Street Widening Roads, Bridges a nd Freeways 100,000 ; 100,000 10 Joy Street Railroad Cro ss lag Roads, Bridges a nd Freeways 100,000 1 100 ,000 11 Sidew alk, Cu rb and Clutter Instal lation/Replacement Roads, Bridges and Freeways 150,000 150,000 t2 Green River Road 'Widening Roads, Bridges and Freeways 200,000 60,000 13 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 116,216 116,216 Total S Estimated. Measure A.En titiements: • ,gray inclu ded lore ofprior FwrdBalance 4,765,000 $ 3,235,000 $ 3,075,00.0 • * 000330 CD JUN -14-2002 09 42AM RIVERSI DE COU NTY TRANSPORTATI ON COMIESSION MEASURE 'WI' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2001/02 - 2005/06 Agency: Clay of Corona Prepared By: Reza Zorgbadr Plume a Na r (909) 739-2441 Dace: Jane 14, 2002 Page 2 of 5 Fiscal Year 2003-2004 ITEM Na PROJECT NAME 1,LIMITS PROJ ECT (Category) TYPE FY 2003.2004 NEW ,4PPROPRIATIONS TOTAL COST MA.ASUR EA ENTITLEMENTS Est. FY 2003-2004 ; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Third Street Improvement and R OM Acquisitions Pavement Re habilitation for Local Streets Major Pavement Rehabilitation Arterial Widening Freeway Bridges/Smith Avenue Storm Drain Magnoliiall-I5 Interchange Improvements Advance Traffic Management System Citywide G IS Application Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Railroad Street Corridor Rirnpau Avenue Corridor Sixth Street Improvements City's ,Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) ' Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Signals and Lighting Builitng, Systems, and Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Operational Budget $ 182,431 800,000 1,000,000 100,000 532,648 500,000 1,904,000 6,880 100,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 120,000 $ 182,431 800,000 600,000 100,000 532,648 500,000 - 6,880 100,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 120,000 0oo0 Total Estimated Measure A Entitlements: 5,691,959 $ 3,391,959 $ 3,363,000 N N ti w JUN -14-2002 09:43AM RIVERSIDE COUNTY TPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL F UNDS PROGRAM FY 2001/02 - 2005/06 Agency: City of Coro na Prepared By: Rein Zolgl1adr PIw.ie No,: (909) 739-2441 Date: J ue 14, 2002 • Page 3 of 5 Fiscal Year 2004.2005 ITEM NO. PROJEC T NAME /LFMITS PROJECT i(Category) TYPE FY 1004-2005 NEW APPROPRIATIONS TOTAL COST MEASURE A. ENTITL WHIM 8sr, FY 2004-2005 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Major Pavement Rehabilitation Arterial Widening Freeway Bridges/Smith Avenue Storm Drain Magnolia/[ -15 Interchange Improvements Citywide GIS Application Sidewalk Curb and Gutter Installation/Replacement Sixth Street Improvements City's Co st Allocation Plan (Overhead) R oads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freew ays Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Building, Systems, and F acilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Operational Budget $ 800,000 1,000,000 100,000 532,648 500,000 10,992 100,000 150,000 125,000 $ 800,000 600,000 100,000 532,648 500,000 10,992 140,000 150,000 125,000 Total Estimated Measure A Entitlements; 3,318,640 $ 2,9 18,640 $ 3,5[8,000 000332 CO CO .. N O Cfl RIVERSIDE CO UNT' TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FU NDS PROGRAM FY 2001102 - 200516 Agency: City al Corona Prepared By: Reza Zolghair Phone No. : (909) 739-2441 D ale: lone 14, 2002 Page 4 of 5 Fiscal Year 2005-2006 ITEM" NO, PRO.fECT NAME/LIMITS PR OJECT (Category) TYPE FY2111>S 2406 £YEIPAPPROPRIATIONS TOTAL COST MEASURE A ENTITLEMENTS' Est, FY2065-20,06 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pavement Rehabilitation for Local Streets Major Pavement Rehabilitation Arterial Widening Freeway Bridges/Smith Avenue Storrs Drain lvfagnolia/I-1 5 Interchange improv ements Citywide G[S Application Sidewalk, Curb and Dirtier Insta llation/Replacement City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Roads, Bridges and Freeways Building, Systems, and Facilities Roads, Bridges and Freeways O perational Budget $ 800,000 1,000,000 100,000 532,648 600,000 12,128 100,000 150,000 $ 300,000 600,000 100,000 532,648 600,000 12,123 100,000 150,000 00333 Total Estimated Measure A Entitiernents: 3,294,776 $ 2,394,776 $ 3 ,571,000 " A g e a c y : P r e p a r e d B y : P h o n e N o , : D a l e : C l a y o f C o r o n a R e z a Z e l g l i a r l r ( 9 0 9 ) 7 3 9 - 2 4 4 1 J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 0 2 R I V E R S L D E C O U N T Y T I P O R T A I 7 O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M S F Y 2 0 0 1 / 0 2 - 2 0 0 5 / 0 6 " P a g e 5 o f 5 F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 0 7 I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T ( C a t e g o r y ) T Y P E F Y 2 0 0 6 . 2 0 9 7 N E F V A P P R O P R I A T f O N S T O T A L C O S T M E A S U R E E N T I T L E M E N T S E a r . F r 2 0 0 6 . 2 0 0 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 P a v e m e n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n f o r L o c a l S t r e e t s M a j o r P a v e m e n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n A r t e r i a l W i d e n i n g F r e e w a y B r i d g e s / S m i t h A v e n u e S t o r m D r a i n M a g n o l i a / 1 - ! 5 I n t e r c h a n g e I m p r o v e m e n t s C i t y w i d e G I S A p p l i c a t i o n S i d e w a l k , C u r b a n d G u t t e r I n s t a l l a t i o n / R e p l a c e n i e n t C i t y ' s C o s t A l l o c a t i o n P l a n ( O v e r h e a d ) R o a d s , B r i d g e s a n d F r e e w a y s R o a d s , B r i d g e s a n d F r e e w a y s R o a d s , B r i d g e s a n d F r e e w a y s R o a d s , B r i d g e s a n d F r e e w a y s R o a d s , B r i d g e s a n d F r e e w a y s B u i l d i n g , S y s t e m s , a n d F a c i l i t i e s R o a d s , B r i d g e s a n d F r e e w a y s O p e r a t i o n a l B u d g e t S " 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 5 3 2 , 6 4 8 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 8 , 1 0 4 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 5 3 2 , 6 4 8 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 8 , 1 0 4 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 T o t a l E s t i m a t e d M e a s u r e A E n t i t l e m e n t s : J U N - 1 4 - 2 0 0 2 0 0 : 4 3 A M $ 3 , 2 9 0 , 7 5 2 $ 3 , 2 9 0 , 7 5 2 $ 3 , 8 1 1 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 4 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'k LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002-2003 City of H emet Mike Gow (009) 765-3870 May 17, 2002 Page 1 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE 1 City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance / Improvements TOTAL TOTAL COST ($000's) 2,11.8 2,118 MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1,461 2,118 000335 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRA M FY 2003-2004 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Hemet Mike Gow (909) 765-3870 May 17, 2002 Page 2 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST $000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance / Improvements TOTAL - 1,598 1,598 1,598 1,598 0003 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2004-2005 City of Hemet Mike Gow (909) 765-3870 May 17, 2002 Page 3of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement. Maintenance / I mprovements TOTAL 1,671 1,671 1,671 1,671 00033? RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2005-2006 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Hemet Mike Gow (909) 765-3870 May 17, 2002 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LI MITS PROJECT TYPE. TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance / Improvements TOTAL 1,696 1,696 1,696 1,696 0003# Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSI ON MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2006-2007 City of Hemet Mike Gow (909) 765-3870 May 17, 2002 Page 5 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LI MITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000's) 1. City-wide Pavement Rehabilitation / Street Improvement Program Pavement Maintenance / Improvements TOTAL 1,810 1,810 1,810 1,810 000339. ITEM NO. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 14 16 20 22 • Agency : City of Lake Elsinore Prepared by : Ray O'Donnell Phone No.: (909) 674-3124 x 242 Note: All figu res In thousands $000's RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA . ORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGR AM FY 2003.2007 •Pagel of 2 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE 02/03 TOTAL MEAS . A COST FUNDS 03/04 TOTAL MEAS, A COST FUNDS 04/05 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 05/06 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 06/07 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND TRANSFER 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 MISCELLANEOUS STREET RESTORATION: VARIOUS LOCATIONS STREET RESTORATION SLURRY SEAL 200 200 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100. CURB,GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT VARIOUS LOCATIONS CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 SAN JACINTO RIVER MITIGATION FOR LAKESHORE DR. BRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 15 2 15 5 MAIN ST/SULPHUR ST DECONTAMINATION REMOVE CONTAMINATION 150 3 1.15 / RAILROAD CANYON ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT STUDY REPORT,DESIGN, CONSTRIUCT 1-15 INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 2,000 20 2,000 20 10,000 10 10,000 10 FIRE STATION MCVICKER PARK NEW BUILDING & ACCESS ROAD 1,870 490 COLLIER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS (OPA) BETWEEN CENTRAL AVE. & ENTERPRISE WAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER 32 3 OUTFLOW CHANNEL - PHASE I FROM LAKE TO GRAHAM AVE. PEDISTRIAN WALKWAY 155 5 TRAFFIC SIGNALS - COLLIER AVE. AT CENTRAL AVE & RIVERSIDE DR. $710 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 650 3 OUTLET CHANNEL PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS GRAHAM AVE. TO HEALD AVE. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY 482 2 CORYDON ST.- UNION ST. TO MISSION TRAIL STREET REHABILITATION 275 2 DIAMOND DR. Cf1 CASINO DR. REPLACE DETECTOR LOOPS LOOP DETECTORS 7 5 000340 MACHADO ST, - STREET REHABILITATION LINCOLN ST. TO ALVARADO ST. STREET REHABILITATION 300 5 Note: All figures in th ousands ($000's) Page 2 of 2 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE 02/03 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 03/04 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 04/05 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 05/06 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 06/07 TOTAL MEAS. A COST FUNDS 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAKESHORE DR. - STREET REHABILITATION LAKE ST. TO MACHADO ST, STREET REHABILITATION 410 20 LAKESHORE DR. - STREET REHABILITATION MACHADO ST, TO WISCONSIN ST. STREET REHABILITATION 190 20 GUNNERSON ST. - LAKESHORE DR, TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE STREET REHABILITATION 400 30 LAKESHORE DR. TERRA COTTA TO DRYDEN ST, STREET WIDENING . PAVEMENT WIDENING 325 20 450 30 LAKESHORE DR: JERNIGAN ST TO 200' EAST OF MACHADO ST - STREET WIDENING STREET WIDENING 480 30 SUMNER AVE: MAIN ST TO CHANEY ST PAVEMENT REHABILITATION/OVERLAY STREET REHABILITATION 75 20 600 30 TOTALS: 3,854 885 2,947 340 3,090 360 11,210 350 11,280 350 MEASURE A CURRENT YEAR ALLOCATION MEASURE A PRIOR YEAR CARRY-OVER 0oC.i 365 520 350 355 365 370 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPO ATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Item ' No. Project ;:Project Fu ndinig Narne/Limits Proj ect "type Sfatus It t a. ultellei, ±fndtr1% Year(s) Page 1 of 12 nnual Pavement Resurfacing Rehabilitation/ On -going annual program. Overlay $2,935,294 2 2002/03 Ironwood Ave. Rehabilitation/Day St. -Pigeon Pass Rd. Reconstruction Reconstruction of the street. $1,272,471 $2,935,294 $1,272,4711 3 2002/03 Frederick/Alessandro Intersection Improvements & Storm Drain Cross Gutter Elimination Storm Drain Release .10% retention. $52,108 $6,2532 4 2002/03 Intersection Cross Gutter Modifications — Ironwood/Pigeon Pass Cross Gutter Elimination Storm Drain Release 10% retention. $46,401 $5,5682 5 2002/03 Iris Ave./Indian St. — Traffic Signals/Street Improvements Traffic Signal Release 10% retention for street improvements. Finish design and construction of traffic signals $208,645 $62,6003 6 2002/03 Perris Blvd./Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Design and construction of traffic signal, $170,000 $170,000 'TEA 21 STP funding - $1,270,700 2 HES funding - $215,000 3 CMAQ funding - $146,000 * Includes carryover funding 000342 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Item Pro ject E t ea ? + ef.Littrlts F* r inns • to , ' If' s i' oloo No. - Fufing Year Page 2 of 12 7 2002/03 Krameria Ave./Kitching St. Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Design and construction of traffic signal. $174,000 $174,000 8 2002/03 Pigeon Pass/Ironwood-Old Lake Reconstruction Release 10% retention. $215,027 $215,027 9 2002/03 Pavement Management Street Pavement Condition Update Ongoing annual program to update condition of street pavement. $28,000 $28,000 10 2002/03 GIS — Graphic Information System Creating Street Data Layers Add public infrastructure information onto City-wide mapping system for tracking, query, and efficient maintenance. $55,000 $55,000 11 2002/03 Preliminary Street Engineering Project Study Report Preparing RFP's to hire consultants. $163,000 $163,000 12 2002/03 San Michele Road/Indian St. - Perris Blvd. Street Construction Construction of street improvements. $408,882 $408,882 13 2002/03 Newhope Street Street Improvements. Construction completion date is June 2003 . $1,111,000 $1,111,000 000343 Includes care er funding • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Ku mar (909) 413.3130 May 16, 2002 • Page 3 of 12 Item No. Project Funding Year(s ) Project,Name/Limits Project Type Status Total a°os.t , M .•easure krA" , °Pudding . 14 2002/03 Reche Route Vista/Recheyon Concepthe Canyon ReportReport Proct S tudy Retain consultant to prepare PSR. $55,000 $55,000 15 2002/03 Route 60 Interchange Study/PS• R Project Study Report Retain consultant to prepare PSR. $65,000 $65,000 16 2002/03 Street Improvement Inventory for GASB 34 Requirements Evaluate Public Infrastructure Review and evaluate public infrastructure. $50,000 $50,000 17 2002/03 Iris Avenue/Indian-Perris Rehabilitation Release 10% retention, $70,000 $70,000 18 2002/03 Eucalyptus Ave./Wichita to 660 Feet East Pedestrian Walk Design and Construction of pedestrian walk for school children, $49,500 $10,0004 19 2002/03 Frederick/Brabham Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Construction. $177,000 $177,000 20 2002/03 Slurry Seal Program Resurface On -going annual program, $3,140,368 $3,140,368 4 Safe Route to School - $39,500 * Includes carryover funding 000344 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Page 4of12 Item'Project No. Funding Year(s) Prolect4Name//Limits .. ProJectT;ype Status T.dtalqCost ''Meas ureWi 'Funding 21 2002/03 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. $122,508 $122,508 22 2002/03 Route 60/Nason Street Interchange Interchange Imp. Lanes East and West Bound Requires revised project report, design, Caltrans & FHWA approval, utility relocation and R/W. Env. study in process. Estimated construction completion date is December 2005. $306,248 $306,2485 23 2002/03 Nason/Alessandro-Fir Traffic Signal Release 10% retention. $58,000 $10,0006 24 2002/03 Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral "B" Bridge Design and construction by RCFC & WCD pending receipt of HBRR grant funding . $510,000 $510,000' 25 2002/03 Perris Blvd./Ramona Expressway to Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral "A" Rehabilitation Widening Planning stage, project report joint project with City of Perris. $320,000 $320,0006 26 2002/03 Reche Vista Realignment/Perris- Heacock to North City Limits Street Construction Environmental, PSR, and design. $300,000 $300,000° ° CMAQ funding $700,000 CMAQ funding $348,000 Pending HBRR funding $2,048,000 8 STIP funding $3,184,000 STIP funding $ 67,000 * Includes carrWr funding 000345 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N ( R O T C ) M E A S U R E " A " S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S F I V E Y E A R P R O J E C T I O N S F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 C i t y o f M o r e n o V a l l e y J o h n H o g a r d & P r a m K u m a r ( 9 0 9 ) 4 1 3 . 3 1 3 0 M a y 1 6 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e 5 o f 1 2 I t e m N o . P r o j e c t F u n d i n g Y e a r ( s ) : P r o j e o t N a m e l L n i t s P r o j e d t T y p e - - S t a t u s T o t e ' o s t : ' M e a s u r e " A F u n d i n g 2 7 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 H e a c o c k S t . / P a r k l a n d A v e . T r a f f i c S i g n a l T r a f f i c S i g n a l D e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n . $ 2 0 7 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 7 , 0 0 0 2 8 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 M o r e n o B e a c h D r . / C o t t o n w o o d A v e . T r a f f i c S i g n a l T r a f f i c S i g n a l D e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n . $ 2 0 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 2 , 0 0 0 2 9 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 C a c t u s A v e . / J o s h u a T r e e A v e . Y e l l o w S o l a r F l a s h i n g B e a c o n s T r a f f i c S i g n a l D e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n . $ 3 4 , 0 0 0 $ 3 4 , 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 M o r e n o B e a c h / A l e s s a n d r o B l v d . S t r e e t a n d D r a i n a g e I m p r o v e m e n t s S t r e e t a n d D r a i n a g e C o n s t r u c t i o n D e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n . $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 P e r r i s B l v d . / N o r t h e r n D a n c e r D r . A c c e s s R a m p s C o n s t r u c t i o n . $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 I n s t a l l a t i o n o f B a t t e r y B a c k - u p S y s t e m f o r 1 0 S i g n a l i z e d I n t e r s e c t i o n s T r a f f i c S i g n a l s C o n s t r u c t i o n , $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 R e t r o f i t S i g n a l i z e d I n t e r s e c t i o n s w i t h L E D ' s T r a f f i c S i g n a l s C o n s t r u c t i o n . $ 6 4 4 , 0 0 0 $ 6 4 4 , 0 0 0 * I n c l u d e s c a r r y o v e r f u n d i n g 0 0 0 3 4 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YE AR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Item No. •Project Funding Year(s) =Project Name/Limits Project Typ e Status Total Cost 'Measure "A" Funding 4,,,,, ... 0 34 (2002-2003 $SUBTOTAL S n'. .w..... JA P/ ..M!:tl: lr`: 2003/04 m r/ d']N .!.M;1K 9'AI4Ri Stl ':M:'M':Y+'AVM.M'. .V.41!"A .i SG! .0,41 1.4,4/ Annual Pavement Resurfacing 0 P 4-hB! ,iNfNAP RISWMM<A::N Yi✓..YMMG.M'}' u//.4.0.VYI'¢I/ .P%P.(I/p.'M./M.4!'b'0,0... W. Rehabilitation/ Overlay 06....YKao%X A Y/+ MAY /.6 VY/M414, ✓"rYVM.W':A✓ On -going annual program. .,VI/ .M /.M,N 'N .N! .PW4<M f$13,320,4521 �. OP, .vM AVAIMNOWN ,01,1411. : $1,300,000 $13,000,319* A 41M.•WIA,ov iA I1.onIY/AV/J✓,(Y ./ $1,300,000 35 2003/04 Pavement Management (Paver) Street Pavement Condition Update On -going bi-annual up -date of pavement management program for street condition. $30,000 $30,000 36 2003/04 Geographic Information System (GIS) Creating Street Data Layers Annual Data Input into Various Street Data $50,000 $50,000 37 2003/04 Preliminary Street Engineering Project Study Report On -going annual program for preliminary engineering, cost estimate, PSR. $215,000 $215,000 38 2003/04 Slurry Seal Program Resurface On -going annual program. $1,320,000 $1,320,000 39 2003/04 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. • $120,000 $120,000 Page6of12 00347 Includes cane funding City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 item • No . 40 41 Project Funding. Ye ar(y) 42 2003/04 2003/04 2003/04 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR. PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 'Project l`anle/Limits Page7of12 Project Type Status Total Cost •Measure F`o:nd:Ing. Route 60/Nason Interchange Perris Boulevard Bridge over Perris Valley Storm Drain, Lateral Traffic Signal Perris Blvd./Ramona Expressway to Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral "A" Interchange Imp. Lanes East and West Bound Construction of east and west bound interchange ramps. Estimated completion date is December 2005. $2,790,000 $321,00010 Bridge Construction of Bridge . $800,000 $160,00011 Rehabilitation Construction of roadway. 43 2003/04 Reche Vista-Perris/Heacock Street Design/construction of roadway . Intersection North to City Limits Construction 44 µ�•�isr ii;fA�. w:'. S+'.'•J"•Ae/ .�..W,G PI.m'.il.'/fi. •ls,d'/ gtl':•. s:'W:W N:',. . rw , r.' :.:, lW:J,,rO,C �P 2003.2004 SUBTOTAL 2004/05 11, $4,570,000 $927,00012 zar;:. ri $2,730,000 $546,000 13 ! .4 4110:1010 .- 44.1%.40/44.1 .4.,01' .0). `0#r:4ti "T S .k'::m:A✓ 40.4l %. W' ..iv i 1 $13,925,000* $4,989,000 '1 r. 0n ../. .,rnri urr [.riwi1,.•pr wruvr:.;srip,,k,w;a:<ar...,g, .e.,r• wsw . 0411,.,r.,nrwsvtire4 (i%W...:.vw 14 11,V rvirrrrOr/ona.:w,[dr srrw.�ri rr.Y,000141,WhIririm 4W /04:rn:a,41% , 40,41 0rririerrr+nV/4 4<0,04. A.i1,..v VA W1,.riti/. 40/41car irara n'A iau.MV/416 V PPi .Wa r4.0 %., 44/ aw .,nn;•.0! Annual Pavement Resurfacing Rehabilitation/ On -going annual program. $1,300,000 $1,300,000 Overlay 10 TEA 21 — STP $2,200,000 11 HBRR funding $2,048,000 12 STIP funding $3,184,000 13 STIP funding $1,967,000 * Includes carryover funding 000348 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISC AL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413.3130 May 16, 2002 Page 8 of 12 Item No. PtCOO Pudding WON) iPtaeiL mita ! 'rofeet typ e t. 'tins 1f t ij f 4a 0. -0 P rr ddIng 45 2004/05 Geographic Information System (GIS) Creating Street Data Layers Annual data input into various street data . $50,000 $50,000 46 2004/05 Preliminary Street Engineering Project Study Report On -going annual program for preliminary engineering, cost estimate, PSR. $215,000 $215,000 47 2004/05 Route 60 Interchange Study Project Study Report On -going bi-annual program study update. $65,000 $65,000 48 2004/05 Slurry Seal Program Resurface On -going annual program. $1,320,000 $1,320,000 49 2004/05 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. $120,000 $120,000 50 2004/05 Route 60/Nason, Interchange Interchange Imp. Lanes East and West Bound Construction of east and west bound interchange ramps. Estimated completion date is December 2005. $1,100,000 $220,00014 51 2004/05 Krameria Avenue @ Lasselle Street Traffic Signals Pending studies identifying specific improvement(s). $200,000 $200,000 14 TEA 21 Demonstration funds $4,200,000 * Includes carer funding 0 349 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Page 9 of 12 Item No. Project Funding Year(s) Project Mane%Limits Project Type Status Total Cost Measure "A"` Funding 52 2004/05 New Unsignalized Intersection Traffic Signals Pending studies identifying specific improvement(s). $220,000 $220,000 (TBD) % 53 2004/05 Interconnects/HES (TBD) Traffic Signals Pending studies identifying specific improvement(s) . $440,000 $440,000 54 2004/05 Bicycle Lanes — Various Locations Bike Lanes Class II/III bike lanes pending receipt of grant funding. $150,000 $150,000 . • ..!. J' „ s caw A`+rr ou r/a r.ar. c: .✓r. .+x ;N .v:N'N "A4 w, w<wsr xN,:.Y. :u:.w: ,•.. *. 'a:p,'. r. +::s:.x+,..!,ymx il.,,v:u:.s..r :.+✓:. ,v. w...u:sa.A r.Orjrrsrr �iw:.w•sP •a M1�Yv:., r•r%rM',e+.aN..ryw;+r,...:rMcw 4rir. %aY'r •r ua nm:fl.•r .x ..+P •.w n ..Ar ABM. N':w+r%,n::r•:+v:./ a+., w,.C .w rw./rs:s /s:/.Or 'A !. .+1*: r..+Iv.: +•;N;:un . ; `:< $ 2004-2005 SUBTOTAL .#/0 4 $5,180,000* *.1 $4,300,000 a 0 f r t ,r/,,r;c. •W..Y:.e+l:vtaer4 0,14',0Va:• rwixu.10:0, ffVele:erg.r NONWarmi a.:040:r 01/ rlea0.f*"1,..dd..rar..r.w.✓. .a..rr r.1KWAWWW/0"MIK4:v^:avwr..m::,an,0%.:4.; .rii040..rr w•r.4'x:0110r.11W4V/sivr.daoram teal ,' a /w.:m:. ,WeareOI i✓ia%d r,.'/Ag:oioim;..m rw.•m,.r' 41.9 /4401 :m.:r: rrcar.m.. 55 2005/06 Annual Pavement Resurfacing Rehabilitation/ On -going annual program. $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Overlay 56 2005/06 Pavement Management (Paver) Street Pavement Ongoing bi-annual up -date of pavement management program for street condition. $30,000 $30,000 Condition Update 57 2005/06 Preliminary Street Engineering Project Study Report On -going annual program. Retain consultant for preliminary engineering, cost estimate, PSR . $215,000 $215,000 * Includes carryover funding 000350 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413.3130 May 16.2002 Page 10 of 12 Item No. Project Funding Year(s) Project NamelLimits Project Type Status Total 'Cost Measure "A" F unding 58 2005/06 Slurry Seal Program Resurface On -going annual program. $1,320,000 $1,320,000 59 2005/06 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation On -going annual program. $120,000 $120,000 $440,000'5' 60 2005/06 Route 60/Nason Interchange Improvements Interchange Improvement Eastbound and Westbound Construction of east and west bound interchange ramps. $2,200,000 61 .. .•... ,o-' . "0.'�r :,-, .k 8+• ;d•.0., 62 2005/06 : :. . .x •,:.: s -. w. +r,::,i:, .r;r .w ,.�;;'a. '. :. :;':•.u. r:.w. ,rr..r. :r.;v.;,,.::, .,„•.,+.;r 2005.2006 j o:!d�/nT •wArA vef,4, 2006/07 Traffic Signal Interconnect SUBTOTAL ,(041'.S'/t,..:•'A/ A: horst%K:q% .Yk.ir/�n"A, ..v.MIA,A VO... 0.4 ,t^ .04 0,:44;,04,r 4r/ Ml.P':I/ .N'/iV:�iM/dV1,/~/41r4F/01A //91e ir/.0. Annual Pavement Resurfacing Traffic Signals :v an...ae •,x•.r�• sv iv:. rr. :m oos••:rr,.ar,nr•m:sr:�.v.,r!.r:t•a re+rw..•r::� ...r.: a.n ..rvow. r+.<a:r.,r:.a".+ ..w, r<;w. .w.,..• n•n• ,.vy;:rr'a.tir" •.a,:..: w• r�.v ..w.ro'w:.w,•a:v •w.:dr iv.r.irw .'.r::v .� ,u: Rehabilitation Overlay Pending studies identifying specific improvement(s) . r a e/ Arae40l /OYY44,4 0.JY.PY1114"Vl/ d1 '/A//O" 1.1 8. /Y/.W/ :1t /41,4111/SM. J 11.N.;Y7.041:M/olr/A::B' i.N F/41,1 1;' Ongoing annual program. $280,000 $8,665,000'` i 1.r/M/N/AY/.407441%ir4►7 ..41V/AC $1,300,000 $280,000 aw::a '.:.rn .:.w ,.« w^,.E .v $3,905,000*io # .1P%F. ',iY in/V/Irwav:wvAr :AP/�' $1,300,000 000351 15 TEA 21 Demo tration funds $4lk ,200,000 * Includes car r funding RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPO TATION COMMISSION (ROTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Item '' No. , Project Fundin g ProJeofN me Um..its. Project Type Oita l 7otat octet -1 i1'nae re '!A*J Funding 63 2006/07 Preliminary Street Engineering Project Study Report Ongoing annual program. Retain consultant for preliminary engineering, cost estimate. $215,000 $215,000 64 2006/07 Route 60 Interchange Study Project Study Report Ongoing bi-annual program study update. $65,000 $65,000 65 2006/07 Slurry Seal Program Resurfacing Ongoing annual program. $1,320,000 $1,320,000 66 2006/07 Surface Recycling Rehabilitation Ongoing annual program. $120,000 $120,000 67 2006/07 • Bicycle Lanes — Various Locations Bike Lanes Class II/III bike lanes pending receipt of grant funding. $150,000 $150,000 68 2006/07 New Unsignalized Intersections (TBD) Traffic Signal Pending studies identifying specific improvement(s) $220,000 $220,000 69 2006/07 Unsignalized Intersections (TBD) Traffic Signal Pending studies identifying specific improvement(s) $440,000 $440,000 Page 11 of 12 * Includes carryover funding 000352 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (RCTC) MEASURE "A" STREETS AND ROADS FIVE YEAR PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2007 City of Moreno Valley John Hogard & Prem Kumar (909) 413-3130 May 16, 2002 Item No. Proj:eot Funding hearts) . :Project Name/Limits 70 2006/07 Heacock Street Bridge 2006.2007; SUBTOTAL TOTAL Project Type Status Total E • st Page 12 of 12 Measure "A"' Funding Bridge Project Study Report, Environmental, Design $100,000 $100,000 046, Y .4 , yAI ; r: r .a.r ,.; . rJr'r.r'r •- •r' •:m: :r w. 'M";+4;al.1^'w:r•: T..a F.;�rry: w::4^:0% f•;a. xr,:r�+ viw:.•. v. ,•pWtw:nPl v;:v,. $3,930,000* $3,930,000* 4 ! i Air,:.Akturit'woonirmoxgrrAor4Pmr; riariiNteii'A/N:M.#:it/Ars.: r!•:Y rl AAiiaw4:a zooi .V:N ] ►J.a[: d% it ,k4K'ok., ,w,ge 8rbw,4pramr.✓,:a.vi $42,020,452 $30,124,311 U:\CAPPROJ\Measure A\5YEAR\2002- 07\ProJections - Shortdoc 000353 * Includes carry funding " A g e n c y : P r e p a r e d b y : P h o n e # : D a t e : C i t y o f M u r r i e t a K e n S e u m a l o 9 0 9 - 4 6 1 - 6 0 7 3 6 / 1 4 / 2 0 0 2 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E ' A ' L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 P a g e 1 o f 1 I t e m N o . P r o j e c t N a m e / L i m i t s P r o j e c t T y p e T o t a l C o s t ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) ��) M e a s u r e A F u n d s ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) 1 F r e n c h V a l l e y P a r k w a y / 1 - 1 5 S o u t h B o u n d O f f - R a m p ( F Y 2 0 0 2 t o F Y 2 0 0 5 ) C i r c u l a t i o n $ 2 , 6 2 1 $ 2 , 6 2 1 2 L i n c o l n & K a s o t a A l i g n m e n t ( F Y 2 0 0 0 t o F Y 2 0 0 3 ) C i r c u l a t i o n $ 6 8 1 $ 6 1 5 3 P a v e m e n t R e s u r f a c i n g / S l u r y S e a l ( F Y 2 0 0 3 t o F Y 2 0 0 7 ) C i r c u l a t i o n $ 6 , 0 1 2 $ 4 , 7 0 1 R C T C M e a s u r e A L o c a l F u n d s 0 0 0 3 5 4 " M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 A g e n c y : C i t y o f N o r c o P r e p a r e d b y : J . S c h e n k P h o n e # : ( 9 0 9 ) 2 7 0 . 5 6 2 7 D a t e : J u n e 5 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e : 1 o f 1 , I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E T o t a l C o s t ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) M e a s u r e " A " F u n d s ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) . C a r r y o v e r P r o j e c t s 1 . B r o k e n A r r o w S t r e e t - C o r y d o n A v e n u e t o B l u f f S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n / O v e r l a y $ 5 5 $ 5 5 2 . R i v e r D r i v e - C e n t e r t o H i l l s i d e A v e n u e s R e c o n s t r u c t i o n / O v e r l a y $ 1 5 $ 1 5 3 . C h e s t n u t D r i v e - B l u f f S t r e e t t o C o r y d o n A v e n u e O v e r l a y $ 4 4 . $ 4 4 4 . B u c k s k i n L a n e - C a l i f o r n i a t o C r e s t v i e w A v e n u e s O v e r l a y $ 4 0 $ 4 0 5 . R i v e r D r i v e - C o r o n a t o V a l l e y V i e w A v e n u e s W i d e n i n g $ 2 5 . . $ 2 5 . 6 . I S T E A p r o j e c t s ( m a t c h ) H a m n e r A v e n u e - T h i r d S t r e e t t o S a n t a A n a R i v e r F i f t h S t r e e t - N o r c o D r i v e t o C a l i f o r n i a A v e n u e S e v e n t h S t r e e t - V a l l e y V i e w t o C a l i f o r n i a A v e n u e s O v e r l a y $ 9 8 7 $ 1 9 7 7 . B l u f f S t r e e t - R i v e r R o a d t o S t a g e c o a c h D r i v e R e c o n s t r u c t i o n / O v e r l a y $ 1 2 0 $ 1 2 0 8 . R o u n d u p R o a d - C o r r a l t o T r a i l S t r e e t s O v e r l a y $ 7 8 , $ 7 8 9 . A l h a m b r a S t r e e t - N o r c o t o R i v e r R i d g e D r i v e s O v e r l a y / R e c o n s t r u c t i o n $ 7 0 $ 7 0 . 1 0 . . C e d a r A v e n u e - N o r c o D r i v e t o N o r t h o f P a i l D r i v e O v e r l a y $ 6 2 $ 6 2 . l - A f r 4 A f t ` 0 0 0 3 5 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002 - 2003 A gency: City of Norco Prepared by: J. Schenk Phone #: (909) 270-5627 Date: June 5, 2002 Page: a. of .2,. ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE T otal Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 11. Sixth Street - Cedar Avenue to River Ridge Drive Overlay/Reconstruction $ 12 $ 12 ' 12. Riding Ring Road - Western to Pacific Avenues Caballeros Road, Indian Horse Drive, Roan Court Overlay/Reconstruction $ 77 $ 77 13. Paddock Lane -. East of Mountain Avenue Overlay $ 21 . $ 21 14. Valley View Avenue - Sixth to Detroit Streets Overlay $ 27 $ 27 15. Reservoir Drive - Corona to Temescal Avenues Overlay/Reconstruction $ 30 $ 30 ica-4U 0 0 011S6 • " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 A g e n c y : C i t y o f N o r c o P r e p a r e d b y : J . S c h e n k P h o n e # : ( 9 0 9 ) 2 7 0 . 5 6 2 7 . D a t e : J u n e 5 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e : I T E M T o t a l C o s t M e a s u r e " A " N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) F u n d s ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) 1 . P i k e s P e a k D r i v e - S i x t h S t r e e t t o M o u n t S h a s t a D r i v e R e c o n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 7 0 r , $ 1 7 , 5 , , 2 . M o u n t S h a s t a D r i v e - C r e s t v i e w t o M o u n t R u s h m o r e O v e r l a y $ 3 8 . 2 ; , : $ 3 8 , 2 3 . M o u n t V e r d e D r i v e - E n t i r e L e n g t h O v e r l a y $ 1 7 . : 2 , . $ 1 7 . 2 4 . M o u n t B l a n c C o u r t O v e r l a y $ 6 , 5 $ 6 , 5 5 . M o u n t B a l d y C o u r t O v e r l a y $ 4 , 6 $ 4 . 6 6 , M o u n t R u s h m o r e D r i v e - C r e s t v i e w t o M o u n t S h a s t a O v e r l a y $ 4 3 , 7 $ 4 3 , 7 i 7 . C r e s t v i e w D r i v e S e v e n t h t o E i g h t h S t r e e t s O v e r l a y $ 2 9 $ 2 9 8 . S i x t h S t r e e t - C r e s t v i e w t o A n i m a l C o n t r o l O v e r l a y $ 2 1 , 5 $ 2 1 . 5 , 9 , L a Q u i n t a W a y - G a r d e n G r o v e A v e n u e t o H u e r t a W a y O v e r l a y $ 2 2 , 3 $ 2 2 , 3 1 0 . G a r d e n G r o v e A v e n u e - R e s e r v o i r D r i v e t o H i l l s i d e O v e r l a y $ 2 3 . 9 $ 2 3 . 9 , 1 1 . S u n n y H i l l s D r i v e - V i n e t o C o r y d o n A v e n u e s O v e r l a y $ 3 0 , 1 $ 3 0 . 1 1 2 . S a g e T r e e L a n e O v e r l a y $ 1 1 , 8 $ 1 1 , 8 1 3 . L a s s o L a n e O v e r l a y $ 9 , 9 $ 9 , 9 1 4 . S t r e e t S t r i p i n g S t r i p i n g $ 2 0 $ 2 0 / c a - 4 0 1 1 8 0 0 0 3 5 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPO RT ATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002 -2003 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: J. Schenk Phone #: (909) 270.5627 Date: June 5, 2002 Page:.. of .2:. ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 15. Misc. Pavement Repair Pavement Repair $ 30 $ 30 16. Hamner Avenue at Hidden Valley Parkway Left Turn and Signal Modifications $ 120 ' $ 120. 17. Driftwood Place, Sage Tree Lane, Half Moon Court Overlay $ 30 $ 30 18. Santa Anita Road - Kips Korner Road to Corydon Overlay $ 60. $ 60 19. Corona Avenue - Sixth to Seventh Streets Overlay $ 60. $ 60 20. Fourth Street Intersection Improvements Street/Signal Improvements $ 80 $ 80,' /ca -40118 0.0008 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 4 A g e n c y : C i t y o f N o r c o P r e p a r e d b y : J . S c h e n k P h o n e # : ( 9 0 9 ) 2 7 0 . 5 6 2 7 D a t e : J u n e 5 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e : 1 o f I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E T o t a l C o s t ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) M e a s u r e " A " F u n d s ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) 1 , R a q u e l R o a d - T e m e s c a l A v e n u e t o E n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 2 5 , 2 $ 2 5 , 2 2 , B l u f f S t r e e t - V i n e A v e n u e t o R i v e r R o a d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 6 4 $ 6 4 3 . G o l d e n G a t e C i r c l e - S a n t a A n i t a R o a d t o C u l - d e - s a c R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 9 . 5 $ 9 . 5 4 . P a r k r i d g e A v e n u e - S e c o n d S t r e e t t o K i p s K o r n e r R o a d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 3 5 , 9 ' : $ 3 5 . 9 ' 5 . I n d u s t r i a l A v e n u e - H a m n e r A v e n u e t o C u l - d e - s a c R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 2 9 $ 2 9 6 . C o r o n a A v e n u e - F o u r t h t o F i f t h S t r e e t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 5 2 . 3 $ 5 2 . 3 7 . C u r t i s D r i v e , S t a y n e r W a y , L o r i C o u r t , a n d R i d g e c r e s t " R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 6 6 , 5 ' $ 6 6 , 5 8 . T h i r d S t r e e t - H i l l s i d e A v e n u e t o C u l - d e - s a c R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 6 1 , 2 $ 6 1 , 2 9 , N o r c o n i a n D r i v e - F i f t h S t r e e t t o C o r y d o n A v e n u e R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 6 3 , 5 ' $ 6 3 , 5 1 0 . S i e r r a A v e n u e - T h i r d t o F i f t h S t r e e t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 9 2 . 7 $ 9 2 , 7 1 1 . C o r o n a A v e n u e - F i r s t t o S e c o n d S t r e e t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 6 0 $ 6 0 1 2 . S t a g e c o a c h D r i v e - B l u f f S t r e e t t o E n d R e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 2 2 . $ 2 2 / ���� I A A I l l 0 0 0 3 5 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2004 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: J. Schenk Phone #: (909) 270.5627 Date: June 5, 2002 Page: 2 of 2. ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE Total Cost ($000's) Mea sure "A" Funds ($000's) 13. 14. 15. 16, Roundup Road - Corral Street to Stagecoach Drive Hillside Avenue - Second to Third Streets Acacia Avenue - School Street to Cedar Avenue Hamner Avenue at Second Street I Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Left Turn and Signal Modifications $ 38,5 $ 46 ,5 $ 60,5 $ 1,24, $ 38,5 $ 46,5 $ 60.5 $ 120, le.. -4 _ " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 4 - 2 0 0 7 A g e n c y : C i t y o f N o r c o P r e p a r e d b y : J . S c h e n k D a t e : J u n e 5 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e : 1 o f I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E T o t a l C o s t ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) M e a s u r e " A " F u n d s ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n M i s c e l l a n e o u s P a v e m e n t O v e r l a y s S t r e e t S t r i p i n g M i s c e l l a n e o u s S e a l C o a t s M i s c . P a v e m e n t R e p a i r T r a f f i c S i g n a l I m p r o v e m e n t s $ 4 9 0 $ 4 9 0 $ 6 0 $ 1 2 0 " $ 9 0 $ 6 0 $ 4 9 0 $ 4 9 0 $ 6 0 $ 1 2 0 $ 9 0 $ 6 0 0 0 0 3 6 1 1159982 CITY OF PERRJS June 12, 2002 Mr. Jerry Rivera, Program Manager RCTC 3560 University Avenue Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 RE: City of Perris 5 -Year Plan DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING. 170 WILKERSON AVE., SUITE A, PERRIS, CA 92570-2200 TEL.:. (909) 943-6504 FAX: (909) 943-8416. - HABIB MOTLAGH, . CITY ENGINEER DECEUVEfi RI JUN 14 2002 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The following projects are to be included in City of Penis's 5 year plan utilizing Measure "A", Gas Tax, Federal and other local funds: Project Fiscal Year Type Total Cost ($1,000's) Measure "A" ($1,000's) _ Orange Ave:,& Indian Ave. 02-03 Pavement Rehab &. Widening 300 300 °G"Street ,: ::. : `w 02-03 Pavement Rehab. 300 300 Diana &'San Jacinto Imp. 02-03 Pavement Rehab. 450 0 "D" Street 02-03 Pavement Rehab. 300 300 Misc. Pavement Projects, Intersection Imp. & Signals 02-03 New Pavement 140 40 Case Road 02-03 Pavement Rehab. 900 0 Misc. Pavement Projects, Intersection Imp. & Signals 02-07 Signals & Widening 400 300 Oleander Avenue Extension 03-04 New Pavement 400 0 Case Road Bridge 03-04 New Bridge 1300 100 Enchanted Heights 03-04 Pavement Rehab. 500 500 Copper Creek Subdivision 03-04 Pavement Rehab. 150 150 Perris Blvd. Rehab. 03-07 Pavement Rehab. 1200 600 Ethanac Road Improvements 04-05 Pavement Rehab. 300 300 Ramona Expressway (Phase IV) 04-05 Pavement Rehab 1,000 759 Redlands Ave_ 04-05 Pavement Rehab 300 300 Enclosed is the M.O.E. certification and the supporting documents. The priority and timing of the above projects may be subject to change. Please call if you have any questions or need any further information. Sincerel Ha • • Mo agh City Engineer 000362 " A g e n c y : C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e P r e p a r e d b y : T o m B o y d P h o n e N o . : ( 9 0 9 ) 8 2 6 - 5 5 7 5 D a t e : J u n e 1 3 , 2 0 0 2 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 P a g e 1 o f 9 I T E M N O . T O T A L C O S T M E A S U R E A P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 1 M a j o r S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t r e e t R e s u r f a c i n g 2 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 2 C e n t r a l A v e . W i d e n i n g , V a n B u r e n B l v d . t o A d a m s S t . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 1 , 5 0 0 * 1 4 5 0 3 U n i o n P a c i f i c a t P a l m y r i t a A v e . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g , C r o s s i n g I m p r o v e . 2 8 0 1 5 0 * 1 3 0 4 U n i o n P a c i f i c a t C o l u m b i a A v e . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g , C r o s s i n g I m p r o v e . 3 0 0 1 0 0 * 2 0 0 5 J u r u p a A v e . U n d e r p a s s S t r e e t U n d e r p a s s 1 4 , 0 0 0 * 7 0 0 0 6 L a S i e r r a / 9 1 F w y . R e c o n s t r u c t i o n I n t e r c h a n g e I m p r o v e m e n t s 1 6 , 8 0 0 * 2 0 0 7 M i t c h e l l A v e . - W e l l s A v e . t o A r l i n g t o n A v e . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 1 , 6 0 0 8 0 0 * 8 0 0 8 V a n B u r e n . B l v d . W i d e n i n g - M a g n o l i a t o 9 1 F w y . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 5 , 0 0 0 * 3 , 0 0 0 9 J u r u p a A v e . - V a n B u r e n B l v d . t o C r e s t A v e . S t r e e t E x t e n s i o n 2 , 2 0 0 * 2 , 2 0 0 1 0 T y l e r S t . - W e l l s t o E u r e k a S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 4 , 7 5 0 * 4 , 5 0 0 1 1 9 1 F r e e w a y N a n B u r e n B o u l e v a r d I n t e r c h a n g e 1 4 , 6 0 0 * 2 , 6 0 0 1 2 * T y l e r @ C a m p b e l l T r a f f i c S i g n a l I n s t a l l a t i o n 1 0 0 * 1 0 0 I n d i c a t e s M P a S 1 I 1 a A f l t n t l i n n i n n r i n r f i n . n i v e n r c + g : \ c o m m o n \ m e a s a c i p 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 6 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION M EASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002- 2003 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Tom Boyd Phon e No.: (909) 826-5575 D ate: June 13, 2002 Page 2 of 9 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A F UN DS ($000'S) 13 Tyler @ Gramercy Traffic Signal Installation 100 *100 14 Spruce @ Atlanta Traffic Signal Installation 120 *120 15 Computers/Office Furniture Engineering Workstations 20 20 16 CADME Street Plan Data Updates 1,600 40 17 General Plan Update Update General Plan 100 100 18 Curb & Gutter Repair Rep of C&G damaged by str trees 200 200 19 Alessandro/Canyon Crest/Overlook Parkway Traffic Signal 90 *90 20 Arlington Ave. at Phoenix Ave. Traffic Signal 90 *90 21 Brockton Ave. at Nelson St. Traffic Signal 120 *120 22 Chicago Ave. at Ransom Rd. Traffic Signal 70 *70 23 Chase Road Realignment Realignment of Road 250 250 24 Washington/Bradley Tra ffic Signal 100 100 25 Union Pac @ Kansas Street Widening & Crossing Impv 200 50 26 Union Pac @ Third :Street Widening & Crossing Impv 150 50 g:\common\measacip2002 ooo� " A g e n c y : C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e P r e p a r e d b y : T o r n B o y d P h o n e N o . : ( 9 0 9 ) 8 2 6 - 5 5 7 5 D a t e : J u n e 1 3 , 2 0 0 2 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 P a g e 3 o f 9 I T E M N O . T O T A L C O S T M E A S U R E A P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 2 7 C a m p b e l l S t I m p S t r e e t I m p r y 8 0 0 8 0 0 2 8 M a r k e t S t W i d e n i n g F a i r m o u n t / 1 s t S t r e e t W i d e n / M e d i a n s 1 , 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 9 2 n d S t R e c o n M a i n / M u l b e r r y S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 V B W i d e n i n g S A R i v e r t o J a c k s o n S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 1 , 8 0 0 1 5 0 3 1 V i c t o r i a M e d i a n s L a S i e r r a / B o u C o n s t r u c t i o n o f M e d i a n s 1 , 5 5 0 1 , 1 0 0 3 2 L a S i e r r a G r a m e r c y ( R e v ) T r a f f i c S i g n a l R e v i s i o n 8 0 8 0 3 3 U n i v e r s i t y - O t t a w a t o E u c a l y p t u s M e d i a n s 2 , 3 0 0 * 2 , 1 0 0 3 4 B r o c k t o n / U n i v e r s i t y T r a f f i c S i g n a l R e v i s i o n 8 0 8 0 3 5 C C / C o u n t y C l u b T r a f f i c S i g n a l I n s t a l l 9 0 9 0 3 6 C o l o r a d o / J a c k s o n T r a f f i c S i g n a l R e v i s i o n 8 0 8 0 3 7 I o w a / M a r l b o r o u g h T r a f f i c S i g n a l I n s t a l l 1 2 0 1 2 0 3 8 L i m e / 1 2 t h T r a f f i c S i g n a l I n s t a l l 1 2 0 1 2 0 * I n d i c a t e s M A A R ! I r A A f 1 t n r i i n n i n n r i n r f i c n n i c t c n r a g : \ c o m m o n \ m e a s a c i p 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 6 5 RIV ERSIDE CO UNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A"LOCAL F UNDS PROGRAM FY 2002- 2003 Agency: City of Riverside P repared by: Tom Boyd Phone No.: (909) 826-5575 Date: June 13, 2002 Page 4 of 9 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJ ECT TYP E TOTAL COST (3000'S) MEASURE A .FUN DS (3000'S) 39 VB/Coyote Bush. Traffic Signal Install 120 120 Subtotal Project Costs 65,990 Subtotal FY2003 Meas. A Funding 6,100 Subtotal Prior Meas. A Funding 24,870 uI�Ilvaaca IV I . UIG !1. Iu11l. IlII 111 �.71IVI II L I yGCll.7. g:\commo n\rneasacip2002 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Tom Boyd Phone No.: (909) 826-5575 Date: June 13, 2002 • RIVERSIDE CO UNTY T RANSPORTATION C OMMISSION ME AS URE "A" LOCAL FUNDS P ROG RAM FY 2003- 2004 • Page 5 of 9 ITEM TOTAL COST M EAS URE A NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS P ROJECT TYP E ($000'S) FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing 2,000 2,000 2 Computers/Office Furniture Engineering Workstations 20 20 3 CADME Street Plan Data Updates 1,600 55 4 Grammercy Place / La Sierra to Bushnell Street Widening 1,100 850 1,100 5 Market St Widening, Fairmont to 1st Street Widening 500 300 *200 6 Central Ave., Lochmoor Dr to City Limits Median Construction 350 350 7 Overlook Pkwy Arroyo Crossing Street Extension 1,500 1,300 8 Van Buren Blvd Widening - SA River to Jackson Street Widening 1,800 250 *150 9 Union Pac at Kansas Street Widening & Crossing Impv 200 150 *50 10 Union Pac at Third Street Widening & Crossing Impv 150 100 *50 * Indicat M es easure un mg in prior fiscal years. g;\common\measacip20.02 000367 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Tom Boyd Phone No.: (909) 826-5575 Date: Ju ne 13, 2002 RIVERSIDE COUNTY T RANSPORTATION COMMISSION M EASU RE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003- 2004 Page6of9 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 11 12 * I:n I'I if+7+CC%/1C7o11re% Traffic Signal Improvements Curb & Gutter A ftinrlinn it, r .. C".. .....1 . Traffic Signals Rep of C&G damaged by str trees Subtotal Project Costs Subtotal FY2004 Meas. A Funding Subtotal Prio r Meas. A Funding _ 300 200 10,820 .. 300 200 5,875 450 g:\common\measacip2002 ooh$ " A g e n c y : C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e P r e p a r e d b y : T o m B o y d P h o n e N o . : ( 9 0 9 ) 8 2 6 - 5 5 7 5 D a t e : J u n e 1 3 , 2 0 0 2 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 4 - 2 0 0 5 P a g e 7 o f 9 I T E M T O T A L C O S T M E A S U R E A N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 1 T r a f f i c S i g n a l I m p r o v e m e n t s T r a f f i c S i g n a l s 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 G r a m e r c y P I . - L a S i e r r a A v e . t o B u s h n e l l A v e . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 1 , 1 0 0 2 5 0 * 8 5 0 3 M a j o r S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t r e e t R e s u r f a c i n g 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 4 C A D M E S t r e e t P l a n D a t a U p d a t e s 1 , 6 0 0 5 5 5 C o m p u t e r s / O f f i c e F u r n i t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g W o r k s t a t i o n s 2 0 2 0 6 L a S i e r r a W i d e n i n g - I n d i a n a A v e . t o C l e v e l a n d A v e . S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 8 0 0 8 0 0 7 M a r k e t S t W i d e n i n g , F a i r m o n t t o 1 s t S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 1 , 1 0 0 6 0 0 * 5 0 0 8 V a n B u r e n B l v d W i d e n i n g / S A R i v e r t o J a c k s o n S t r e e t W i d e n i n g 1 , 8 0 0 1 , 4 0 0 * 4 0 0 9 M i n o r S t r e e t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t r e e t R e s u r f a c i n g 3 , 6 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 S u b t o t a l P r o j e c t C o s t s 1 0 , 9 2 0 S u b t o t a l F Y 2 0 0 5 M e a s . A F u n d i n g 9 , 0 2 5 . S u b t o t a l P r i o r M e a s . A F u n d i n g 1 , 7 5 0 * - I r i r 1 i i - + G e I t A c n e l I r e A f I g m e m m e t i n . . . i n n . . . r i n n n i . . + " v v . . r l v ' - . ' " ' r �� I 6 1 1 I V I I I y 1 1 1 L f 1 1 V l I l �� l l t Q l y G Q 1 . g : \ c o m m o n \ m e a s a c i p 2 0 0 2 RIVERSID E COUNTY TRANSPORT ATION COMMISSION M EASUR E "A"LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY2005- 2006 Agency: City of'Riverside Prepared by: Tom Boyd Phone No. : (909) 826-5575 D ate: June 13, 2002 Page 8 of 9 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJ ECT TYPE T OTAL COST ($000'S) MEAS URE A F UNDS ($000'S) 1 Eastridge Ave./Box Springs Rd to Sycamore Cyn Medians 500 500 2 La Sierra/91 Fwy. Reconstruction Interchange Improvements 16,800 *200 3 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signals 300 300 4 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing 2,100 2,100 5 Computers/Office Furniture Engineering. Workstations 20 20 6 CADME Street Plan Data Updates 1,600 55 7 Minor Streets Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing 3,600 3,600 8 Curb & Gutter Rep of C&G damaged by str trees 200 200 Subtotal Project Costs 25,120 Subtotal'FY2006 Meas. A Funding 6,775 Subtotal Prior Meas. A Funding 200 n lUIVQ4GJ IV IGQJUI G P1 IUI IU-II ItJ. III �JI IVI II (.. 1I yCdI.1. g:\common\measacip2002 000. " A g e n c y : C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e P r e p a r e d b y : T o m B o y d P h o n e N o . : ( 9 0 9 ) 8 2 6 - 5 5 7 5 D a t e : J u n e 1 3 , 2 0 0 2 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 0 7 P a g e 9 o f 9 I T E M T O T A L C O S T M E A S U R E A N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) , F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 1 T r a f f i c S i g n a l I m p r o v e m e n t s T r a f f i c S i g n a l s 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 M a j o r S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t r e e t R e s u r f a c i n g . 2 , 2 0 0 2 , 2 0 0 3 A d a m s S t / M a g n o l i a I n t e r s e c t i o n M e d i a n s 2 0 0 2 0 0 4 C o m p u t e r s / O f f i c e F u r n i t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g W o r k s t a t i o n s 2 0 2 0 5 C A D M E S t r e e t P l a n D a t a U p d a t e s 1 , 6 0 0 5 5 6 A l e s s a n d r o B l v d / B a r t o n S t t o A l e x a n d r a S t M e d i a n s 3 5 0 3 5 0 7 M i n o r S t r e e t s R e h a b i l i t a t i o n S t r e e t R e s u r f a c e 3 , 6 0 0 3 , 6 0 0 8 C u r b & G u t t e r R e p o f C & G d a m a g e d b y s t r t r e e s 2 0 0 2 0 0 S u b t o t a l P r o j e c t C o s t s $ 7 , 9 7 0 S u b t o t a l F Y 2 0 0 7 M e a s . A F u n d i n g $ 6 , 9 2 5 S u b t o t a l P r i o r M e a s . A F u n d i n g . $ - T o t a l F Y 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 M e a s . A F u n d i n g $ 3 4 , 7 0 0 * . I n r i i r a t a c A i l o a C l . l r e A f i i n r l i m n i n n r i n r { f e r m i . g : \ c o m m o n \ m e a s a c i p 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 7 1 . " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M - F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 2 / 0 3 J 0 3 / 0 4 ! 0 4 / 0 5 ! 0 5 / 0 6 0 6 / 0 7 0 3 r d S t 4 H a m m o n d R d D a t e K i l e r R d . 2 8 ( m i ) 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 4 0 D E R C 2 1 0 3 7 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 0 1 6 t h A v e 3 A t l a n t i c A v e E ' l y t o e n d . 2 3 ( m i ) 1 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) W i d e n , R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 5 3 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 2 1 1 2 3 8 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 ' 0 T o t a l 5 3 4 6 t h S t 2 R i v e r v i e w D r S E ' l y 8 0 0 ' . 1 5 ( m i ) 1 8 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n s t a n d W i d e n A C P a v e d R o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 4 2 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 3 5 1 0 1 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 4 2 7 3 r d A v e 4 W i n d l a s s D r E l y W i n d l a s s D r . 1 6 m i . 1 6 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 6 D E R C 3 0 1 2 1 0 2 3 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 6 A l b e r t a A v e 4 S w i n g l e A v e W l y 0 . 1 5 m i . 1 5 ( m i ) 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 4 8 D E R C 3 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 7 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 8 A t v i s o A v e 2 A v e J u a n D i a z E ' l y 0 . 3 4 m i . 3 4 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 6 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 0 A n g e l a A v e 2 5 8 t h S t N ' l y 0 . 1 2 m i . 1 2 ( m i ) 3 3 ( f t ) / 3 3 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 8 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 8 0 0 0 3 7 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 2 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 02/03 1 03/04 04/05 105/06 06/07 Armstrong Rd 2 Sierra Ave S.B. County line 1.03 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 423 D E R C 40 1 0 • 2 300 Measure 0 0 0 380 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 423 Atlantic Ave 3 Dillon Rd 16th Ave .50 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, Resurf RMS paved road 301 other 91 D E R C 301 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 2 1 25 63 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 91 Ave San Timoteo 3 Orchard St Avenida Miravilla .87 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road 300 other 163 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 3 1 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 163 Baker St 2 300 110 D 0 0 0 15 0 Kennedy St Limonite Ave E 0 0 0 1 0 .42 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R `0 0 0 0 0 Resurf 0.17' AC other C 0 0 0 94 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 110 Bautista Rd 3 300 344 D 0 0 0 33 0 NW'ty Bautista 4.95 mi NW'ly Ranch Rd 1 mi E 0 0 0 1 0 1.71 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 0 0 0 310 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 344 Bautista Rd 3 300 776 D 0 0 0 75 0 NW'ly Ranch Rd 1 mi Fairview Ave E 0 0 0 1 0 2.87 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconst other C 0 0 0 700 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 776 Big Pine St 3 300 38 D 0 0 0 0 0 Jeffery Pine Rd Silver Fir Dr E 0 0 0 0 0 .20 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road 'other C 38 - 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 38 • 0003'73 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 3 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 ( 0 5 / 0 6 1 0 6 / 0 7 B o h l e n R d 3 M i t c h e l l R d N l y . 5 0 ( m i ) 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) W i d e n , C o n s t 2 6 ' , 0 . 5 ' D G , 0 . 2 1 ' R M S w / B e r m s 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 0 3 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 2 1 0 1 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 0 3 B r o o k s i d e A v e 3 N a n c y A v e B e a u m o n t A v e . 8 0 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d V e r i f y l i m i t s o f p r o p o s e d a n n e x a t i o n . 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 1 7 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 8 1 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 1 7 C a j a l c o R d 1 L a S i e r r a A v e L a k e M a t h e w s D r 3 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 8 5 5 D E R C 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 1 5 0 1 0 0 3 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 : 8 5 5 C a j a l c o R d 1 K i r k p a t r i c k R d L a k e M a t h e w s D r 2 . 7 0 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n s t A C p a v e d r o a d , w i d e n s h o u l d e r s a n d C o n s t r u c t l e f t t u r n p o c k e t s a t A r c h e r R d , K i r k p a t r i c k R d a n d L a k e M a t h e w s D r . 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 0 5 1 2 8 0 D E R C 3 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 4 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 2 8 0 A / W 0 0 0 0 s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 T o t a l 1 6 8 5 C a j a l c o R d 1 L a S i e r r a A v e T e m e s c a t C a n y o n R d 2 . 7 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 9 0 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 1 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 9 0 T o t a l 1 9 0 0 C a l i c o A v e 3 C h a p a r r a l R d C o t t o n w o o d R d . 2 1 ( m i ) 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 2 4 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 2 4 C a l l e D e L a s F l o r e s 4 C l e a r w a t e r W y S n o w V i e w D r . 3 1 ( m i ) 1 7 ( f t ) / 1 7 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 5 5 D E R C 3 0 1 5 1 0 4 9 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 5 5 : 0 0 3 7 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 4 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornnental C = Construction Total 02/03 03/04 104/05 05/06 06/07 Cedar St 2 Tumbleweed St 52nd St .94 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 159 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 143 0 0 0 0 Total 159 Chabela Dr 3 300 23 D 0 5 0 0 0 Soboba Rd San Jose Dr E 0 1 0 0 0 .07 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R '0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 0 17 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 23 Chaparral Rd 3 300 215 D 0 0 0 21 0 Tamarack Rd Verbenia Ave E 0 0 0 1 0 .37 (mi) 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 0 193 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 215 Cherry Cove 4 301 49 D 5 0 0 0 0 Calle De Las Flores Palm Oasis Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .14 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 43 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 49 Clark St 1 300 252 D 20 0 0 0 0 Cajalco Rd Martin St E 1 0 0 0 0 1.00 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 231 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 252 Clearwater Way 4 301 32 D 5 0 0 0 0 Calle De Las Flores S'ly Palm Oasis 0.05mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .16 (mi) 17 (ft)/ 17 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 26 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 32 Clanton Keith Rd 1 300 703 D 2 0 0 0 0 Avenida La Cresta Murrieta City Limits E 0 0 0 0 0 1.65 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconst road other C 701 0 0 0 0 Coordinate with the City of Murrieta for the west half of 0.3 miles of road. 300 Measure A/Western Total 703 • 000375 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 5 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l " 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 1 0 6 / 0 7 C l i n t o n S t 4 ' M i l e s A v e P l y t o C . L . . 2 5 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) R e s u r f w e s t 1 / 2 o f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 3 4 5 D E R C 3 5 2 0 1 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 3 0 7 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 I o t a ! 3 4 5 C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A r e a 4 v a r i o u s r o a d s 6 . 0 0 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) R e s u r f 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 3 5 0 2 6 1 0 D E R G 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 8 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 V a l l e y 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 T o t a l 4 9 6 0 C o r a l S t 4 C a l l e D e L a s F l o r e s P l y P a l m O a s i s 0 . 0 5 m i . 1 9 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 6 5 D E R C 3 0 1 6 1 0 5 8 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 5 C o r r a l S t 2 H o m e s t e a d S t P l y H o m e s t e a d 0 . 1 9 m i . 1 9 ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 7 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 7 C o r y d o n S t 1 G r a n d . A v e M i s s i o n T r 1 . 5 6 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 1 / 2 i n t h e C i t y o f L a k e E l s i n o r e . P u r s u e c o o p w / C i t y . A d d l e f t t u r n l a n e a t U n i o n S t r e e t . 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 1 0 2 7 5 D E R C 3 8 1 0 1 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 3 7 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 8 5 C o t t o n w o o d R d 3 T a m a r a c k R d V e r b e n i a A v e . 4 5 ( m i ) 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 6 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 2 5 1 0 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 6 0 C r y s t a l S p r i n g s D r 4 C a l l e D e L a s F l o r e s P a l m O a s i s A v e . 1 5 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 5 2 D E R C 3 0 1 5 1 0 4 6 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 5 2 0 0 9 3 7 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 6 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi). EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 02/03 1 03/04 1 04/05 1 05/06 1 06/07 De Portola Rd (2 segments) 3 300 1051 D 0 0 0 0 0 S'ly Monte De Oro .5mi Glen Oaks Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 4.25 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconst AC paved road other C 1051 0 0 0 0 Segment 2 is from Anza Rd to Pauba Rd 300 Measure A/Western Total 1051 Delano Dr 3 300 53 D 0 0 0 0 0 Toll Gate Rd N'ly end E 0 0 0 0 0 .27 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 53 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 53 Double Tree Dr 3 300 33 D 0 0 0 0 0 Jeffery Pine Rd Silver Fir Dr E 0 0 0 0 0 .15 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 33 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 33 Double View Dr 3 300 219 D 0 0 0 0 0 Meadow Glen Dr W'ly E 0 0 0 0 0 1.21 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 219 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 219 Elaine Dr 3 301 59 D 2 0 0 0 0 Sycamore Rd 16th Ave E 1 0 0 0 0 .44 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 56 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 59 Elm Ave 3 300 103 D 0 0 10 0 0 14th St Beaumont C.L. E 0 0 1 0 0 .49 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 92 0 0 Coordinate with City of Beaumont for half of road width. 300 Measure A/Western Total 103 Ethanac Rd 3 300 604 D 75 0 0 0 0 Goetz Rd E'ly to Perris C.L. E 1 0 0 0 0 1.75 (mi) 12 (ft)/ 12 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon South side of road other 659 C 2 526 0 0 0 Coordinate with City for north side of road. City Share is listed as unfunded and is not 300 Measure A/Western Total 1263 • O003'7E7 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 7 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l E u c a l y p t u s S t E s p e r a n z a A v e . 1 7 ( m i ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f I d a A v e 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 3 7 T o t a l F l e e t w o o d D r V i a C e r r o W i l s o n S t . 7 0 ( m i ) 6 2 ( f t ) / 6 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 2 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l F o u r C h i m n e y s R d D e l a n o D r . 1 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d W i l y e n d 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 0 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 3 7 2 5 3 2 5 3 1 9 1 9 F r e d W a r i n g D r & C l i n t o n S t I n d i o C . L . W i l y S i l v e r w o o d D r . 5 8 ( m i ) 6 4 ( f t ) / 1 1 0 ( f t ) W i d e n s t r e e t a n d C o n s t s i d e w a l k S i d e w a l k i n c l u d e s t h e w e s t s i d e o f C l i n t o n S t f r o m F r e d W a r i n g D r t o R i v e r l a n e D r . F r e m o n t i a R d T a m a r a c k R d . 3 7 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 2 0 2 4 8 2 5 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 0 6 / 0 7 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 1 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 2 2 8 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o t t o n w o o d R d 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l G a l e n a S t R u t i l e S t . 7 5 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d F e l s p a r S t 7 1 ( f t ) / 7 1 ( f t ) 2 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 1 5 2 1 5 6 3 2 1 5 4 T o t a l G a r b a n i R d M u r r i e t a R d E v a n s R d . 4 3 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 l i t ) R e c o n 2 4 ' - 5 3 ' , A C p a v e d r o a d W i d t h v a r i e s f r o m 2 4 ' t o 5 3 ' . 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 7 8 6 D E R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 2 1 1 0 1 9 3 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 7 3 6 7 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 3 6 7 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ' 7 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 Page 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/13/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Gilman Springs Rd SE'ly Jack Rabbit Tr NW'ly Bridge St 1.80 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Reconst and widen AC Paved Road. Coordinate w/project A2-0433 in Supv. Dist. 3. 5 Gilman Springs Rd SE'ly Bridge St 1.50 (mi) Reconst AC Paved Rd SH 79 (Sanderson Rd) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) 3 300 other Total 300 other Total Gilman Springs Rd 2 locations NW'ly Jack .Rabbit Tr SE'ly Bridge St .00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Recon, realign See A7-0310 in Supv.Dist.5 for companion project 3 300 other Total Glenoaks Rd Rancho California Rd 2.76 (mi) Recon AC paved road E'ly 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 300 other Total Granite Hill Dr Pyrite St 1.72 (mi) Recon AC paved road Valley Way 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) 2 300 other Total Greenwald Ave SH 74 Canyon Lake City Gate 2.61 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Pulverize, Resurf 0.33' AC Project is 31% in SD #3, and 3% in SD #1 3 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 205 773 978 02/03 103/04 104/05 05/06 106/07 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 205 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2708 2708 D E R C 2 1 45 2660 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 1815 1927 861 861 D E R C 0 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 145 9 0 707 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 829 829 320 295 615 E R C 15 1 0 1 0 0 0 812 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 320 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hansen Ave 10th St Montgomery Ave 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/berms 3 300 other Total 203 203 D R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 200 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 000379 4110 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 9 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 02/03 J 03/04 ( 04/05 05/06 106/07 Hattie Ave 3 Elm St Ply end .14 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Grind and Resurf 300 other 30 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 5 1 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 30 Helen Ave 4 Clinton Ave Wly 0.4 mi .40 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 301 other 101 D E R C 301 10 1 0 90 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 101 Helen Ave 3 Elm St Ply end .07 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Grind and Resurf 300 other 19 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 5 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 19 Hemet Area 3 various roads .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved roads 300 other 1000 1100 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 800 Total 2100 Highgrove Area 5 various streets .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 1500 800 D E R C 300'Measure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A/Western 50 10 0 490 50 10 0 490 40 5 0 355 Total 2300 Homestead St 2 Limonite Ave Stirrup St .31 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 44 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 38 0 0 0 0 Total 44 Hudson St 2 58th St N'ly 0.12 mi .12 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 56 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 50 0 0 0 0 Total 56 000380 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscat years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page. 10 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 02/03 03/04 1 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 Jeffery Pine Rd 3 Cedar Glen Dr Wily .20 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 38 D E R C 0 0 0 38 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 38 39 John Muir Rd 3 Lodge Rd Seneca Dr .21 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other D E R C 300 0 0 0 39 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 39 1041 Johnston Ave 3 San Jacinto St Ply Stanford 0.12 mi 1.68 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC pavedroad 300 other D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 100 7 0 0 0 . 0 0 934 Total 1041 Juniper Flats Rd 3 Juniper Springs Sly 1.61 .(mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS W/Berms 300 other 202 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 1 1 0 200 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 202 Jurupa Rd 2 Etiwanda Ave Poinsetta Pt 2.90 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 722 D E R C 60 0 0 662 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` 0 0 0 Total 722 King Ave 1 Van Buren Blvd Krameria Ave .16 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 119 D E R C 300 20 1 0 98 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 119 La Sierra Ave 1 El Sobrante Rd Cleveland Ave 1.90 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 64 (ft) Widen to 4 lane Mtn. Arterial Hwy- Agreement with Victoria Grove,LLC. 300 other 524 41 D E R C 300 0 0 0 524 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 565 • • 000381 II RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 • Page 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/13/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 02/03 J 03/04 104/05 05/06 106/07 La Vida Dr Calle De Las Flores .18 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) 4 Lake Elsinore Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf (ft)/ (ft) 1 301 other Total 300 other Total Lake Ln Toll Gate Rd .09 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Marian View Dr 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) 3 300 other Total Lakeview Ave Ramona Expressway Nuevo Rd 3.05 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Recon 30', 0.25' AC Add turn lanes at Post Office. 3 300 other Total Lakeview Ave 10th St 1.11 (mi) Reconst 12th St 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 3 300 other Total Lasso Ct Corral St S'ly Corral 0.05 mi .05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 2 300 other Total Limonite Ave Etiwanda Ave Bain St 1.00 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 42 (ft) Const continuous left turn lane 2 300 other Total 61 61 1100 2078 3178 D E R C 6 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 1100 300 Measure A/Western 17 17 D E R C 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 47 359 359 14 14 E R C 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 1 0 325 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 8 0 0 0 232 450 682 D E R C 89 50 0 93 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000382 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 12 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 02/03 ( 03/04 1 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 Limonite Ave/Riverview Dr 2 300 549 D 0 0 0 0 0. Morton Ave Mission Blvd E 0 0 0 0 0 4.10 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other 1196 C 549 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1745 Los Cabatlos 3 300 252 D 0 0 1 0 0 Pauba Ave SH79 E 0 0 1 0 0 1.34 (mi) '24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon RMS paved road other C 0 0 250 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 252 Lovekin Blvd 4 302 120 D 120 0 0 0 0 S'ly Seeley Ave 0.5 mi N'ly'Seeley Ave 0.25mi E 0 0 0 0 0 .75 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 52 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const turning lanes other 631 C 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde Total 751 Malaga Rd 1 300 87 D 12 0 0 0 0 Mission Tr E'ly E 1 0 0 0 0 .26 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 74 0 0 0 0 Coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore for the north 1/2 of street. 300 Measure A/Western Total 87 Maple Rd 3 301 49 D 0 2 0 0 0 Atlantic Ave Nancy Dr E 0 1 0 0 0 .31 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf RMS paved road other C 0 46 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 49 Marian View Dr 3 300 84 D 0 0 0 0 0 S.H.243 Wily E 0 0 0 0 0 .49 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 84 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 84 Mauna Loa Dr 3 301 48 D 0 2 0 0 0 Mojave My E 0 1 0 0 0 .31 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon 32',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS other C 0 45 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 48 • 000383 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 P a g e 1 3 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t M e a d o w G l e n D r D o u b l e V i e w D r I d y l l b r o o k D r . 3 1 ( m i ) 2 2 ( f t ) / 2 2 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d C o o r d i n a t e w i t h w a t e r l i n e w o r k M i r a L o m a A r e a v a r i o u s r o a d s 8 . 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d ( f t ) / ( f t ) M i s s i o n B l v d U P R R X - i n g 3 - 5 1 . 3 4 - " C E ' l y o f V a l l e y W a y . 0 5 ( m i ) 4 8 ( f t ) / ( f t ) U p g r a d e C r o s s i n g G a t e s , . r e s u r f r o a d & d r a i n a g e M o j a v e R d C a r o l D r . 1 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d N a n c y D r 3 3 ( f t ) / 3 3 ( f t ) M o n t e V i s t a D r B a x t e r R d 1 . 2 3 ( m i ) R e s u r f 2 8 ' , 0 . 2 1 ' A C B u n d y C a n y o n R d 3 6 ( f t ) / 3 6 ( f t ) M o n t e r e y A v e V a r n e r R d . 6 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d R a m o n R d 5 0 ( f t ) / 5 0 ( f t ) M u r r i e t a R d C o r s o n A v e 1 . 2 5 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d N e w p o r t R d 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) F u l d S o u r c e T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 2 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 2 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 3 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 1 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t A $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 1 . 0 4 / 0 5 ! 0 5 / 0 6 1 0 6 / 0 7 6 1 6 1 2 9 5 0 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 6 3 6 3 1 9 1 9 1 7 4 1 7 4 8 4 4 0 0 4 8 4 2 8 6 2 8 6 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 6 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 1 0 8 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 5 0 0 0 3 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 1 6 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 D 3 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 1 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 2 8 6 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 14 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 106/07 Murrieta Rd 3 Scott Rd Corson Ave 1.75 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 83 D E R C 0 0 0 83 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 83 Nancy Dr 3 Dillon Rd N'ly to end .33 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, Resurf RMS paved road 301 other 64 D E R C 301 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 2 1 13 48 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 64 Neptune Dr 4 Flamingo Dr Nly Via CostaBrava.2mi .25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface Paved Road 301 other 44 D E R C 301 2 1 0 41 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 44 New Chicago Ave 3 Alto Dr Acacia Ave .13 (mi) 16 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon surface and widen road 300 other 205 D E R C 300 21 2 0 182 Measure 0 0 '0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 205 North Shore Dr 4 Flamingo Dr Nly Via CostaBrava.1mi .27 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface Paved Road 301 other 47 D E R C 301 2 1 0 44 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 47 Old Elsinore Rd 5 S'ly Rider 0.85 mi San Jacinto Ave 2.32 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 744 D E R C 300 81 2 0 9 Measure 0 0 0 652 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 744 Opal St 2 45th St 43rd St .25 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Const sidewalk 300 other 130 39 D E R C 300 0 0 2 128 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 169 • • )385 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 5 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 . 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 1 0 6 / 0 7 O r c h a r d S t 3 N a n c y A v e B e a u m o n t A v e . 7 1 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 9 6 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 1 9 1 0 1 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 9 6 O r e a n a W a y 4 C a l l e D e L a s F l o r e s P a l m O a s i s A v e . . 2 0 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 6 7 D E R C 6 1 0 6 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 7 P a l m O a s i s A v e 4 S n o w V i e w D r C l e a r w a t e r W y . 3 6 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 1 2 1 D E R C 1 1 1 0 1 0 9 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 2 1 P a l o V e r d e A r e a 4 v a r i o u s r o a d s . 0 0 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 2 o t h e r 8 3 5 2 6 3 0 D E R C 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 1 3 5 A / P a l o 0 0 0 2 5 0 V e r d e 0 0 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 2 2 5 T o t a l 3 4 6 5 P a l o m a r R d 3 J o h n M u i r R d D i c k e n s o n R d . 2 7 ( m i ) 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 6 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 6 P a r D r 3 T h o r n h i l l D r O l y m p i a W a y . 2 6 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e s u r f 3 2 ' , 0 . 2 1 ' A C P e t r o m a t 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 8 0 E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 1 1 0 3 6 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 3 8 P a u b a R d 3 S H 7 9 D e P o r t o l a R d 2 . 3 4 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 6 1 8 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 5 3 0 6 1 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 1 8 0 0 . 0 . 8 6 : RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 16 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 02/03 03/04 04/05 ` 05/06 06/07 Peach St 3 Esperanza Ave Ida Ave .17 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Grind and Resurf 300 other 34 D E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 5 1 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 34 Pedley Area 2 various roads 7.00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf AC paved roads 300 other 1320 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 300 Measure 0' 0 0 0 A/Western 10 5 0 355 50 0 .0 400 100 0 0 400 Total 1320 Pigeon Pass Rd 5 Moreno Valley C.L. 0.7 mite North M.V.C.L .70 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) Recon and realign AC paved road 300 other 443 D E R C 70 4 20 2 300 Measure 0 0 0 347 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 443 Pilot Dr 4 Windlass Dr Ply 0.20 mi .20 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurface Paved Road 301 other 35 D' E R C 301 2 1 0 32 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 35 Plum St 3 Esperanza Ave Ida Ave .17 (mi) 24 -(ft)/ 24 (ft) Grind and Resurf 300 other 37 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 5 1 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 37 Ramon Rd 4 San Miguelito Dr 1000 Palms Cyn Rd 3.40 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Recon AC paved road 301 other 356 1158 D E R C 301 103 3 0 5 Measure 0 0 0 245 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 1514 Rancho California 1 De Luz Rd Temecula C.L. 3.39 .(mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Recon AC paved road 300 other 1239 D E R C 300 140 5 0 2 Measure 0 0 0 1092 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1239 • 000'387 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 7 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 n a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n R e c h e T o t a l 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 ( 0 5 / 0 6 ( 0 6 / 0 7 C a n y o n R d A r r o y o D r ! P l y 0 . 4 m i . 4 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 4 0 ( f t ) R e a l i g n r o a d 5 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 4 - 1 6 D R R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R e c o r d T o t a l 5 0 R d 3 P o t t e r R d S H 7 9 . 7 5 ( m i ) 1 3 ( f t ) / 1 3 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f 3 0 0 o t h e r 8 Q D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 8 1 0 7 1 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 8 0 R i v e r R d 2 S a n t a A n a R i v e r . 1 2 ( m i ) ( f t ) / . ( f t ) B r i d g e R e p l a c e m e n t R C T D B r . # S 8 0 0 2 , S t a t e B r i t . 5 6 C 0 1 7 R C T D i s w o r k i n g t o s e c u r e t h e l o c a l m a t c h i n g 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 6 2 2 3 7 3 D E R C 3 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 2 3 8 9 R i v e r v i e w D r 2 L i m o n i t e A v e A v e J u a n D i a z 1 . 8 7 ( m i ) 2 5 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) R e c o n s t r u c t s u r f a c e a n d w i d e n 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 2 4 2 D E R C 3 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 9 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R o b l e T o t a l 1 2 4 2 D r 3 E n c i n o R d S ' l y E n d . 1 8 ( m i ) 2 3 ( f t ) / 2 3 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 3 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R o c k y T o t a l 3 3 W a y 3 D o u b l e T r e e D r W ' l y . 0 5 ( m i ) 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 1 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l R o u n d 1 1 R o b i n D r 3 S H 2 4 3 S W ' l y E n d . 1 3 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r " 3 0 0 3 2 D 0 R 0 R 0 C 3 2 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 3 2 0 0 0 8 8 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 18 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 02/03 03/04 04/05 J.05/06 106/07 Rubidoux Blvd 2 300 45 D 0 0 0 0 0 UP RR X-ing 3-54.70-C E 0 0 0 0 0 .05 (mi) 70 (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Upgrade Crossing gates and road surface other C 45 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 45 Sage Rd 3 300 1640 D 7 0 0 0 0 East Benton Rd ' S'ly 5.49 mi E 7 0 0 0 0 5.49 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon RMS paved road other C 1626 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 1640 Sagebrush Ave 3 300 45 D 0 0 0 5 0 Wily Cottonwood 0.02mi Verbenia Ave E 0 0 0 1 0 .14 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 0 39 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 45 Sail Cir 4 301 9 D 2 0 0 0. 0 Lighthouse Rd Ely Lighthouse 0.04 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurface Paved Road other C 6 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 9 San Jacinto Rd 3 300 74 D 0 0 0 0 0 Fern Valley Rd Glen Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .38 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 74 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 74 San Sevaine Channel/Van Buren Blvd 2 300 303 D 3 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Road improvements associated with construction of the Flood Control Project of San Sevaine other C 300 0 0 0 0 Channel Stage 7. 300 Measure A/Western Total 303 San Timoteo Cyn Rd 3 300 177 D 13 0 0 0 0 Live Oak Cyn Rd S.B. County Line E 0 0 0 0 0 .23 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Recon AC paved road other C 164 0 0 0 0 50% in SD#3 300 Measure A/Western Total 177 • • 000389 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 9 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x S 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 1 0 6 / 0 7 S c o t t R d 3 I - 2 1 5 W i n c h e s t e r R d ( S H 7 9 N ) 5 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n s t r u c t A C p a v e d r o a d a n d i n v e s t i g a t e w i d e n i n g t o 4 l a n e s . R C T D i s s e e k i n g f u n d s f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n . 3 0 0 o t h e r 8 9 D E R C 8 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 8 9 S c o t t R d 3 M u r r i e t a R d I - 2 1 5 2 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 5 1 4 6 8 1 D E R C 1 0 0 5 1 3 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 1 9 5 S e a h o r s e W a y 4 B a r n a c l e D r P o r t C i r . 1 2 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) , R e s u r f a c e . P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 1 9 D E R C 2 1 0 1 6 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 9 S i l v e r F i r D r 3 C e d a r G l e n D r W i l y . 1 7 ( m i ) 2 7 ( f t ) / 2 7 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 3 D E R C 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 3 3 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 3 3 S i m p s o n R d 3 B r i g g s R d R t e 7 9 3 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d I n v e s t i g a t e g r o u n d w a t e r p r o b l e m n e a r p o n d s . 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 4 0 2 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 4 0 2 S o b o b a R d 3 N ' l y B a t h A v e 0 . 1 m i C h a b e l a D r . 5 6 ( m i ) 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o f o r s o u t h h a l f o f r o a d . 3 0 0 o t h e r 9 2 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 9 1 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 9 2 S o b o b a S t 3 S t e t s o n A v e R t e 7 4 1 . 2 5 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d R / W n e e d s r e s e a r c h 3 0 0 o t h e r 7 0 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 2 0 6 2 3 T o t a l 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 , 9 : 0 _ RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 Page 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/13/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist South Broadway 15th Ave Blythe CL .40 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Resurface 0.1', 38' A/C W/ petromat Stetson Ave Hemet St Soboba St .27 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Realign and widen AC paved road Stetson Ave Soboba St Fairview Ave 1.50 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen and Reconst Surface Stetson Ave Dartmouth St Stanford St .25 (mi) 42 (ft)/ 56 (ft) Widen & recon existing pvmnt. Add left turn lane Fronting Hemet High School Modify Stanford/Stetson signal Studio Pl Kennedy St Lakeview Ave .15 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.21' AC Sun City Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf AC paved roads (ft)/ (ft) Sun City Blvd McCall Blvd .50 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Chambers Ave 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) Fund Source Total 4 302 other Total 3 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 2 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 3 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 02/03 1 03/04 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 85 85 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 8 2 0 75 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 602 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 47 C 602 0 0 649 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 558 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 558 0 0 558 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 268 268 D 20 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 2 0 0 C 26 220 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 47 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 15 1 0 31 0 0 0 0 660 1700 2360 232 232 D E R c 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 10 0 0 0 550 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 0 0 209 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 000391 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 • Page 21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/13/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Sun City Median Improvements Segment 4 & 5 Sun City Blvd .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Place Stamped Concrete 3 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 1 06/07 125 Total Sun City Median Improvements Segments 6, 7 & 8 cherry Hills Blvd .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Place Stamped Concrete 3 300 other Total 125 D E R C 14 1 0 110 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165 165 Swingle Ave 4 Miles Ave N'ly Miles Ave 0.2 mi .20 (mi). 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface Paved Road 301 other Total Sycamore Rd Atlantic Ave .31 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Nancy Dr 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 3 301 other Total Sylvester Rd Mission Tr .21 (mi) Recon AC paved road Lakeview Terrace 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 1 Tamarack Rd Wily Verbenia 0.57 mi .57 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Verbenia Ave 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) 3 300 other Total 300 other Total 36 36 D E R C 17 1 0 2 0 0 0 145 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 01 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 49 49 150 150 D E R C 2 1 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 E R C 25 1 0 124 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 264 264 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd Ramon Rd/Washington St Dillon Rd 5.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen and Resurf RMS paved road 4 301 other Total 770 770 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 25 1 0 238 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 4 2 0 764 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 000392 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 22 06/13/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 02/03 03/04 04/05 ( 05/06 106/07 Tomal Ln 2 300 45 D 0 0 0 5 0 58th St 56th St E 0 0 0 1 0 .24 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf with AHRM other C 0 0 0 39 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 45 Transfer to City of Temecula 1 300 100 D 0 0 0 0 0 Redhawk Area E 0 0 0 0 0 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Annexation agreement fundtransfer other C 100 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 100 Tumbleweed St 2 300 21 D 0 0 0 5 0 58th St South end E 0 0 0 1 0 .08. (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf. AHRM other C 0 0 0 15 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 21 Valley Wy/ Armstrong Rd 2 300 354 D 140 70 0 0 0 SR 60 Sierra Ave E 136 8 0 0 0 .90 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 76 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconst and widen to 4 lanes other 6605 C 0 0 0 0 0 RCTD is working to secure the local matching funds needed for R/W and construction. 300 Measure A/Western Total 6959 Van Buren Blvd 1 300 109 D 15 0 0 0 0 West of Regency Ranch Wily 0.5 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .50 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const concrete V ditch other C 93 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 109 Van Buren Blvd 1 300 19 D 0 0 0 0 0 Mockingbird Canyon Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .10 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 60 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const right turn lane for SE -bound traffic other C 19 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western - Total 19 Van Buren Blvd 1 300 669 D 110 0 0 0 0 Washington St Orange Terrace Pkwy E 5 0 0 0 0 3.50 (mi) 76 (ft)/ 76 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Const raised median, C & G, and Bus turn -outs other 1916 C 198 356 0 0 0 Future. Coop w/City of Riverside Bus turn -outs primarily from Mockingbird Cyn Rd 300 Measure A/Western Total 2585 • • • 000393 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 2 3 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A \ F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 x . 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 C 0 6 / 0 7 V a r n e r R d 4 R a m o n R d E ' l y H a r r y O l i v e r T r . 7 0 ( m i ) 4 4 ( f t ) / 4 4 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 0 1 5 6 0 D E R C 2 5 2 2 8 1 4 6 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 7 6 1 V e r b e n i a A v e 3 R a i l r o a d A v e C h a p a r r a l R d . 5 1 ( m i ) 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 9 5 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 2 8 1 0 2 6 6 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 9 5 V e r b e n i a A v e 3 C h a p a r r a l R d W i l y C h a p a r r a l 0 . 3 1 m i . 3 1 ( m i ) 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 7 9 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 7 9 V i n e l a n d S t 3 E d g a r C a n y o n C h a n n e l . 0 1 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) C o n s t r u c t b o x c u l v e r t 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 0 3 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 5 2 2 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 0 3 W a s h i n g t o n S t 4 1 0 0 0 P a l m s C y n R d P u s h a w a l t a R d 1 . 6 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n s t A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 5 0 6 0 4 D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 2 V a l l e y 0 0 0 1 3 3 T o t a l 8 5 4 W e l l m a n R d 3 T e r w i l l i g e r R d K i r b y S t 1 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) W i d e n N o r t h s i d e , 0 . 5 ' D G ; R e s u r f 2 6 ' , 0 . 2 1 ' R M S 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 0 3 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 0 3 W o r s l e y R d 3 2 0 t h A v e D i l l i o n R d . 7 0 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) R e c o n s t r u c t s u r f a c e w i t h R M S o n e x i s t i n g b a s e T o t a l 3 0 1 o t h e r 7 3 D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 2 1 0 7 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 3 9 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2003-2007 Page 24 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/13/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist z* Future Projects District 1 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 1 300 1890 other 2601 Total 4491 z* Future Projects District 3 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 02/03 1 03/04 1 04/05 ( 05/06 06/07 D E R C 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 170 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 170 170 0 0 0 0 1210 3 300 290 other 4410 Total 4700 z* Future Projects District 4 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be usedfor pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 170 4 301 2450 other 4335 Total 6785 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 200 300 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 650 800 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 100 0 0 400 z* Future Projects District 5 Only .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) These funds will be used for various pavement rehabilitation projects in the years shown. 5 300 1500 other 2341 Total 3841 D E R C 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 300 450 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 400 • 000395 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 P a g e 2 5 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 3 / 2 0 0 2 F u n d S o u r c e S o u r c e N m e F i s c a l Y e a r ( A m t x $ 1 0 0 0 ) F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l E x p e n d i t u r e 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 0 6 / 0 7 ( A m t x $ 1 0 0 0 ) 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 3 0 2 M e a s u r e A / P a l o V e r d e * G r a n d T o t a l s * 1 9 7 0 2 8 3 9 0 7 3 6 2 7 7 7 5 6 2 9 4 4 9 5 2 3 1 6 5 1 1 5 1 1 1 9 0 8 2 3 3 7 1 3 0 3 8 7 1 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 5 0 2 2 5 2 2 5 1 0 4 0 2 1 4 7 3 1 0 1 2 1 9 5 2 0 1 0 3 3 7 7 8 2 2 5 9 2 7 3 0 0 0 3 9 6 Agen cy: Prepared by:. Phone #: Date: Item No. 4.' 5. 6. • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CO MMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003 — 2007 City of San Jacinto Habib Motiagh, City Engineer (909) 487-7342 April 30, 2002 Project Name/Limits Page 1/2 East Main Street (San Jacinto Ave. to Jordan Avenue) Ramona Boulevard (State Street to Sanderso n Avenue) West Main Street (San Jacinto Ave. to Seventh Street) Kirby Avenue (Cottonwood Ave. to Esplanade Avenue) Ramona Blvd. & Tahquitz Miscellaneous Traffic Control Devices and Traffic Studies Project Type Street Improvements Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements Pavement Rehabilitation Sidewalk Improvements Traffic Safety Improvements Total Cost ($000's) 559 300 340 150 136 42 Me asure A Funds ($000's) 300 300 250 150 73 42 000397 7, 8. Santa Fe Avenue (Esplanade to Menlo Avenue) Warren Rd., N/Cottonwood Ave. Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation 100 120 100 120 9. Esplanade Avenue (S an Jacinto to Pavement 90 90 Congress Ln.) Rehabilitation 10. Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs throughout the City Pavement Rehabilitation 90 90 11. Community College Dr. (State to Eagle Dr.) Curb, gutter, and drainage repairs 35 35 12. Miscellaneous Sidewalk Projects Sidewalk Installation &. 150 75 (First, Sixth & Seventh Streets) ADA Ramps 13. Sanderson Avenue Pavement Pavement 1,000 1,000 Rehabilitation - Ph. II Rehabilitation 0008 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 A g e n c y : C i t y o f T e m e c u l a P r e p a r e d B y : W i l l i a m G . H u g h e s - D i r e c t o r o f P u b l i c W o r k s / C i t y E n g i n e e r P h o n e N . o . : ( 9 0 9 ) 6 9 4 - 6 4 1 1 D a t e : 0 6 / 1 0 / 0 2 P a g e 1 o f 5 I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E T O T A L C O S T S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) M E A S U R E " A " F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 1 J e f f e r s o n A v e . P a v e m e n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n - P h a s e H R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 0 f A s p h a l t C o n c r e t e P a v e m e n t 1 , 8 4 1 , 1 2 0 1 , 8 4 1 , 1 2 0 2 D i a z R o a d R e a l i g n m e n t t o V i n c e n t M o r a g a D r i v e D e s i g n & C o n s t r u c t i o n o f 4 - l a n e R o a d w a y 2 , 4 2 8 , 4 0 0 9 2 2 , 5 8 0 3 P a v e m e n t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n P r o g r a m - C i t y w i d e S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n & R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 8 3 0 , 0 0 0 2 9 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 9 r ; \ d a u e r j \ P u b w k s \ M e a s u r e A 0 3 . 0 7 . j c d RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2004 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared By: William G. Hughes - Director of Public Works/City Engineer Phone No.: (909) 694-6411 Date: 06/10/02 Page 2 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/ LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COSTS ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,311,863 1,119,163 • r:\dauerj\Pubwks\Meas 3-07.jcd RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRA M FY 2004 - 2005 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared By: William G. Hughes - Director of Public Works/City Engineer Phone No.: (909) 694-6411 Date: 06/10/02 Page 3of5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/ LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COSTS ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,536,100 1,325,000 . 000401 r:\dauerj\Pubwks\MeasureA03-07.jed RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CO MMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2005 - 2006 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared By: William G. Hughes - Director of Public Works/City Engineer Phone No.: (909) 694-6411 Date: 06/10/02 Page4of5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/ LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COSTS ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,554,500 1,325,000 r:\dauerj\Pubwks\Meas 3-07,jcd . RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRA M FY 2006 - 2007 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared By: William G. Hughes - Director of Public Works/City Engineer Phone No.: (909) 694-6411 Date: 06/10/02 Page 5 of 5 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/ LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COSTS ($000'S) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000'S) 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation 1,432,020 1,432,020 000403 r; \dauerj\Pubwks\Measu reA03-07, jcd' " " C O A C H E L L A V A L L E Y " 0 0 0 4 0 4 " A g e n c y : P r e p a r e d b y : P h o n e # : D a t e : I t e m N o . R I V E R S I D E C O N T Y T O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R ' A ' L O C A F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 3 C i t y o f D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s J e r r y H a n s o n ( 7 6 0 ) 3 2 9 - 6 4 1 1 , x t . 2 8 7 J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 2 3 - 1 2 3 - 2 2 3 - 3 2 3 - 4 2 3 - 5 2 3 - 6 2 3 - 7 2 3 - 8 2 3 - 9 2 3 - 1 0 P r o j e c t N a m e / L i m i t s W e s t D r i v e - H a c i e n d a t o T w o B u n c h P a l m s O c t i l l o S i d e w a l k - E a s t s i d e P i e r s o n B o u l e v a r d - P a l m D r . n e a r L i t t l e M o r o n g o B - M S W D - S e c t i o n B , N o r t h o f 8 t h S t r e e t C - M S W D - S e c t i o n C , N o r t h o f M i s s i o n L a k e s . S t r e e t S w e e p i n g - C a p i t o l E q u i p m e n t E n g i n e e r i n g P r o j e c t s - C i t y W i d e . P o s t e v e n t c l e a n u p - F u n c t i o n a l c l a s s , a r t e r i a l s A r r o y o F l o o d - W e s t D r i v e a n d A r r o y o P a r k . O c t i l l o S t r e e t R e h a b i l i a t i o n - @ T w o B u n c h P a l m s a n d t h e M i d d l e S c h o o l P r o j e c t T y p e A V A I L A B L E R E V E N U E C u r b , g u i l t e r , a n d s i d e w a l k s & r e c o n s t r u c t i o n S i d e w a l k p r o j e c t f o r s a f e t y . R e c o n s t r u c t i o n & r e h a b i l i t a t i o n 8 b l o c k s S t r e e t r e c o n s t r u c t i o n & r e h a b i l i t a t i o n 1 1 b l o c k s S t r e e t r e c o n s t r u c t i o n & r e h a b i l i t a t i o n C i t y w i d e s t r e e t s w e e p i n g . T r a n s p o r t a t i o n r e l a t e d p r o j e c t s . C l e a n u p a f t e r e a c h s p e c i a l e v e n t . S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n & d r a i n a g e i m p r o v e m e n t s S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n & s a f e t y a c c o m a d a t i o n s T o t a l c o s t $ 1 , 0 5 4 , 5 0 3 . 0 0 $ 5 1 , 4 8 9 . 0 0 $ 8 5 0 , 0 0 7 . 0 0 $ 8 7 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 8 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s $ 2 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 , 5 5 1 . 0 0 $ 5 , 4 4 9 . 0 0 $ 5 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L : $ 2 , 4 8 4 , 9 9 9 . 0 0 $ 2 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2004 Agency Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Desert Hot Springs Jerry Hanson (760) 329-6411, xt. 287 June 12, 2002 Item No. Project Name/ Limits Project Type Total cost Measure A Funds AVAILABLE REVENUE $ 256,000.00 34-1 Engineering Projects Transportation & safety related $ 90,000 .00 $ 40,000.00 34-2 Post Event clean-up City wide on functional class, arterial $ 30,000.00 $ 10,000.00 34-3 Street Sweeper - Capital equipment Purchase remaining balance. $ 75,000.00 34.4 West Dr. - Pierson Blvd. To Mission Lakes Blvd, Reconstruction & safety issues $ 850,000 .00 $ 156,000.00 34-5 Pavement Management Systems City wide. $ 18,000 .00 $ 5,000.00 34-6 Slurry and Surfacing Projects City wide per PMS and as funding allows $ 200,005 .00 $ 45,000.00 TOTAL: 000 $ 1,263,005.00 $ 256,000.00 • " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E ' A � L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 4 - 2 0 0 5 A g e n c y : C i t y o f D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s P r e p a r e d b y : J e r r y H a n s o n P h o n e # : ( 7 6 0 ) 3 2 9 - 6 4 1 1 , x t . 2 8 7 D a t e : J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 " I t e m M e a s u r e A N o . P r o j e c t N a m e / L i m i t s P r o j e c t T y p e T o t a l c o s t F u n d s A V A I L A B L E R E V E N U E $ 2 6 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 5 - 1 E n g i n e e r i n g & D e s i g n P r o j e c t T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R e l a t e d . . $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 5 - 2 P o s t e v e n t c l e a n - u p C i t y w i d e , o n f u n c t i o n a l c l a s s , a r t e r i a l s $ 3 5 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 $ 1 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 5 - 3 S l u r r y a n d S u r f a c e P r o j e c t s C i t y w i d e b y P M S a n d a s f u n d i n g , a l l o w s $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 7 6 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 5 - 4 S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n . 6 a r e a b l o c k s b a s e d o n T r a n s p o r t a t i o n / U s e C r i t e r i a r e c o n s t r u c t i o n & r e h a b i l i t a t i o n $ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 5 - 5 S i g n a l l z a t i o n P r o j e c t - P i e r s o n t o W e s t C a p a c i t y & s a f e t y i s s u e s $ 1 8 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L : $ 9 4 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 6 8 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2005 - 2006 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Desert Hot Springs Jerry Hanson (760) 329-6411, xt. 287 June 12, 2002 Item No. Project Name/ Limits Project Type . T otal cost Measure A Funds AVAILABLE REVENUE $ 272,000.00 56-1 Engineering, Planning & Design Project Transportation Related projects. $ 100,000 .00 $ 50,000.00 56-2 Post event clean-up City wide, on functional class arterials $ 40,000.00 $ 10,000.00 56-3 Resurfacing Projects. City wide by PMS and as funding allows $ 200,000.00 $ 80,000.00 56-4 Street Re construction. •6 to 8 blocks of rebuild based on transportation & use $ 550,000 .00 $ 87,000.00 56-5 Signalization Project - Pierson Blvd. & Indiar Impacts, capacity & safety issues $ 200,000.00 $ 45,000.00 TOTAL: 008 $ 1,090,000.00 $ 272,000.00 • " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E ' A ' L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 6 - 2 0 0 7 A g e n c y : P r e p a r e d b y : P h o n e # : D a t e : C i t y o f D e s e r t H o t S p r i n g s J e r r y H a n s o n ( 7 6 0 ) 3 2 9 - 6 4 1 1 , x t . 2 8 7 J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 I t e m M e a s u r e A N o . P r o j e c t N a m e / L i m i t s P r o j e c t T y p e T o t a l c o s t F u n d s A V A I L A B L E R E V E N U E $ 2 9 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 6 7 - 1 E n g i n e e r i n g , P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n P r o j e c t T r a n s p o r t a t i o n R e l a t e d p r o j e c t s . $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 7 - 2 P o s t e v e n t c l e a n - u p C i t y w i d e , o n f u n c t i o n a l c l a s s , a r t e r i a l $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 7 - 3 R e s u r f a c i n g P r o j e c t s . C i t y w i d e p e r P M S / U s e . $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 7 - 4 S t r e e t R e c o n s t r u c t i o n / R e h a b i l i t a t i o n 1 2 t o 1 5 b l o c k s o f s t r e e t r e b u i l d b a s e d o n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d u s e . $ 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1 7 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L : $ 1 , 0 4 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2 9 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 9 . UPDATED PLAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002-2003 Agency: Prepared by: Date: The City of Indian Wells Timothy T. Wassil, P.E., Public Works Director May 2, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 512 1 Miles Ave Bridge All Weather Bridge 10,000 TOTAL $512 GtTim\Misc\RCTC MEASURES A 02.doc UPDATED PLAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003-2004 Agency: Prepared by: Date: The City of Indian Wells Timothy T. Wassil, P.E., Public Works Director May 2, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 186 1 Miles Ave Bridge All Weather Bridge 10,000 TOTAL $186 G:1Tim\MisccRCTC MEASURES A 02.doc Ob0'411 " A g e n c y : P r e p a r e d b y : D a t e : U P D A T E D P L A N R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 4 - 0 5 T h e C i t y o f I n d i a n W e l l s T i m o t h y T . W a s s i l , P . E . , P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r M a y 2 , 2 0 0 1 I t e m N o . P r o j e c t N a m e / L i m i t s P r o j e c t T y p e T o t a l C o s t ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) M e a s u r e " A " F u n d s ( $ 0 0 0 ' s ) 1 M i l e s A v e B r i d g e A l l W e a t h e r B r i d g e 1 0 , 0 0 0 1 9 4 T O T A L $ 1 9 4 G : I T i m l M i s c R C T C M E A S U R E S A 0 2 . d o c 0 , 0 4 1 a UPDATED PLAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2005-06 Agency: Prepared by: Date: The City of Indian Wells Timothy T. Wassil, P.E., Public Works Director May 2, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 1 Miles Ave Bridge All Weather Bridge 10,000 197 TOTAL $197 G:\Tim\Misc\RCTC MEASURES A 02.doc �dd4i3` UPDATED PLAN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2006-07 Agency: Prepared by: Date: The City of Indian Wells Timothy T. Wassil, P.E., Public Works Director May 2, 2002 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure "A" Funds ($000's) 1 Miles Ave Bridge All Weather Bridge 10,000 210 TOTAL $210 G:\Tim\Misc\RCTC MEASURES A 02.doc 000414 From -PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS Jun -1.4-2002 03:50pm Agency: Prepared by: Phon e No .: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY T PORTATION CO MMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2001— 2002 AND PRIOR YEAR(S) City of Palm Desert Joseph S. Gaugush, P .E. 760(346.0611 ext. 566 June 13, 2002 Page 1 of ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) ME ASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. Fred Waring Drive — Highway 111 to Fairhaven Drive Bridge and Roadway widening, drainage improvements, and traffic signal m odifications 2,300 2,300 2. Kansas Street/Hovley Lane East/Oasis Club Roadway improvements 300 300 Drive 3. Highway 111 @ Desert Crossing/Toys "R" Us Intersection Intersection realignment and traffic signal m odifications 350 350 4. Magnesia Falls Drive Bridge/Street Project - Monterey Avenue to Deep Canyon Road Bridge construction, street widening, and traffic signal modifications 800 800 5. Fred Waring Drive — San Pablo/Goleta Roadway widening and drainage improvements 400 400 6. Gerald Ford Drive - Portola Avenue to Cook Street Roadway widening and drainage improvements 690 690 7. Highway 111 — Larkspur Lane to Indian Wells City Limit Roadway a nd intersection widening, and traffic signal modifications 3,000 3,000 8. NB Portola Avenue — San Marino Circle to El Cortez Way Roadway widening and drainage improvements 1,650 1,650 9. Frank Sinatra Drive — Cook Street to Gerald ford Drive & Gerald Ford Drive — Cook Street to Roadway widening & Traffic Signals 2,500 2,500 Frank Sinatra Drive 6H4/02 • G:1PubW erkst$anja De 1. a Fuente\My DowmentslRCTG1RCTC Funds Pmgrem Form • FY 01.02 cenyoven.doc • sd 000415. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2002 — 2003 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by Joseph S. Gaugush, P.E. Phone No.: 760/346-0611 ext. 566 Date: June 13, 2002 Page ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. Palm Desert High School Access on Cook Roadway & signal 1,236 1,236 Street 2. Portola Avenue/Dinah Shore Extension Roadway widening 1,600 1,600 3, Indian Springs Mobile Home Park Turn Pocket 150 150 4. Portola Interchange at 1-10 Feasibility Study and ROW 2,000 2,000 5. ' Magnesia Falls. Drive Bridge/Street Improvements from Monterey Avenue to Deep Canyon Road Bridge construction, street widening, and traffic signal modifications (additional funding due to expanded of scope of project - see prior year summary for funding carryover) 1,000 1,000 6. Westbound Dinah Sho re from Miriam Way to Street improvements 385 385 Key Largo Avenue 7. Monterey Avenue between Hovley Lane West and Country Club Drive Median island construction 65 65 8. Monterey Avenue at Parkview Drive/COD Intersection improvements 66 66 9. San Pablo Avenue at Highway 111 Intersection improvements 66 66 0006 • 6/13/02 - G;\PubWorks\Sonja De La Fuente\My Documents\ROTC\RCTC Funds Program Form - FY 0•doc • sd From -PALM DESERT PUBLIC Jun -i4-2002 03:51pm RIVERSIDE COUNTY T PORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2003 — 2004 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Joseph S. Gaugush, P.E. Phone No.: 760/346-0611 ext. 566 Date: June 13, 2002 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. 2. 3. Gerald Ford Drive/Frank Sinatra Drive Portola Overcrossing at i-10 Portola Avenue at Whitewater Bridge Roadway widening Design/ROW Design/ROW 475 2,000 750 475 2,000 750 G114/02 • G:1PubWoorkelSonla De La Fuente My DccumentslRCTC\RCTC Funds Program Form • FY 0304 yr 2.doe • ad 000417 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRA M FY 2004 — 2005 roii-PALM DESERT PUBLIC Jun —i4-2002 03:51pm Agency: Prepared by: Phone No.: Date: City of Palm Desert Joseph S. Gaugush, P,E. 7601346 4611 ext . 566 June 13, 2002 Page ITEM NO. PROJECT NA ME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. San Pablo Avenue — Magnesia Falls Drive to COD Driveway Roadway widening 400 400 2. Monterey Avenue — Gerald Ford Drive to Dinah Shore Roadway widening 1,000 1,000. 3. Hovley Lane — Waterway to Oasis Country Club Roadway widening 1,000 1,000 • 6(14102. EMPubWorks onja De La fuenteWy Documents RCTCIRCTC Funds Progra m Form • FY 04.05 • sd From -PALM DESERT PUBLIC Juts -14- 2002 03:51pm • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA SPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOC AL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2005 - 2006 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Joseph S. Gaugush, P.E. Phone No.: 760/346-0611 ext. 566 Date: Jun e 13, 2002 Page 1 of ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) 4,250 MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 4,250 1. Portola Avenue/Whitewater Channel Bridge construction 6114102 • Q1PubWarks1SonJa De La FuenteeMy DocumentslRCTCCRCTC Funds Pro ga m For m - FY 05.08 yr 4.dac • sd 000419 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2006 - 2007 Froi-PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPT Jur-14-2002 03:52pm Agency: Prepared by. Phone No.: Date: City of Palm Des ert Joseph S. Gaugush, P.E. 760/346-0611 ext . 566 June 13, 2002 Page 1 of ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000'S) 1. El Dorado West Roadway construction (engineering) 250 250 2. Monterey Avenue/Avenue 35 Roadway construction (engineering and ROW) 500 500 • 6114/02 • .G:1PubWorks\SonJa De La FuentelAy Dawmenls1RCTC\RCTC Funds Program For m • FY 06077 • sd • t Agency: Prepared by: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRARP ORTATION COMMISSIO N MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROG RAM City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Grants and Gover nment Affairs Manager) J une 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5- Yr. Meas ure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2002-03) • Page 1 of 3 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS (FY 00/01) PROJECT TYPE TOTAL MEASURE "A " COST FUNDS 1* Mesquite Ave. (Desert Way — Demuth Park) Street Widening — south 1/2 239,000 239,000 2* Bridge Repairs (99/00) Misc. Repairs- Various Bridges 50,000 50,000 3* Araby Drive Flood Con trol Study Study Drainage Alternatives 75,000 75,000 4* N. Indian Canyon Widen s/o I-10 to RR Bridge RCTC STP 99/00 Gra nt (Local Match) 200,000 33,000 5* Belardo Rd. Bridge/ Roadways (Ramon- S. End) Federal PLH-D Grant (Local Match) 4,083,000 325,000 * *Continued from Prior Year(2001/02) 01/02 Projects Conti nued to 02/03 $ 4,647,000 $654,500 000421 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPO RTATION COMMISSION MEASU RE "A " LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Gra nts and Government Affairs Manager) J une 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5-Yr. Meas ure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2002-03) Page 2 of 3 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS (2001/02) PROJECT T YPE TOTAL COST MEAS URE "A" FUNDS (1-5) (Carried Forward from Previo us Page) (01/02 Projects Carried Over to 02/03) $4,647,000 $654,000 2001/02 Projects Continued: 6* Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) 465,000 465,000 7* Indian Canyon/ I-10 Interchange (Design Only) Design New 6- La ne Intercha nge at I-10 1,500,000 200,000 8* Bridge Misc. Repairs- 00/01 (Ann ual Program) Repairs to Various Palm Spri ngs Bridges 100,000 100,000 9* Annual SB-821 School Sidewalk Grant (00/01) Local Measure A match ($66,500 SB821) 95,000 66,500 10* CMAQ. PM -10 Mitigation- Various Locations Local CMAQ Match for Paving Projects 500,000 100,000 11* Gene Autry/ Ramon Median Island Landscape 2000/01 TEA Grant (Local Match) 604,000 108,000 (Subtotal of New 2001/02 Projects Above) $3,264,000 $1,039,500 * 2001/02 Projects Contin ued to 2002/03 YR. 2001/02 SUBTOT ALS $7,911,000 $1,693,500 0002 Agency: Prepared by: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TR:A O RTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Grants and Governme nt Affairs Manager) J une 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5-Yr. Measure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2002-03) Page 3 of 3 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS (1-11) *2001/02 Projects continued to 2002/03 (From two previous pages) $7,911,000 $1,639,500 12.* Ann ual Street Crack Filling (Contract) Crack Filling (Co ntract Crews) 50,000 50,000 13.* ARHM Street Overlay(s) Asphalt Overlays -Rubber (C ontract Crews) 375,000 375,000 14.* LED Retrofit of City -Wide Traffic Signals Install Energy Saving LEDs (City Match) 400,000 40,000 15.* Gene Autry/Palm & I-10 Interchan ge. Construction City Joint share of County/C VAG (Design) 12,228,000 500,000 16.* Indian Can yon RR Bridge @ WW River (Design) 4 -lanes (80% HBRR Gra nt) -design only 1,600,000 40,000 17.* Tahquitz & Sunrise/ E.Palm Can yon & S.Palm Can. Traffic Signal Modificati ons 100,000 100,000 18.* Tachevah Drive Traffic Safety (Desert Hospital) Lighted Walk 5,000 5,000 Total 2001/02 Projects S.T. $14,758,000 $1,110,000 2001/02 TOTALS $22,669,000 $2,749,500 NOTE: These projects are 2001/02 Projects continued to 2002/03 000423 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TR ANSPORTATIO N COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOC AL FUNDS PROG RAM Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Gra nts and Go vernment Affairs Manager) J une 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5-Yr. Measure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2002-03) Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A". FUNDS 1. Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Various Locatio ns (Co ntract Crews) 200,000 200,000 2. Annual Street Crack Filling (Contract) Various Locatio ns (Contract Crews) 50,000 50,000 3. Traffic Signal Flow Improv emen ts Various Locations 150,000 50,000 4. E. Palm Canyon & S. Palm Can yon Traffic Signal Modification 125,000 125,000 5. E. Palm Canyon & Araby Dr. Traffic Signal Modification 75,000 75,000 6. Racquet Club & Avenida Caballeros Traffic Sig nal Installation 150,000 150,000 7. Sunrise Way & Sunny Dunes Rd. Traffic Sig nal Installation 106,000 106,000 8. Farrell Dr. & Baristo Rd. -Left- Turn Phasing 125,000 125,000 9. Tachevah Driv e @ Hospital Lighted Walk 25,000 25,000 10. Annual SB-821 Sidewalk Project Install Concrete Sidewalks behind curbs 60,000 30,000 2002/03 TOT ALS $1,066,000 $936,000 000� Agency: Prepared by: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA ORTATION COMMISSION ME ASU RE "A" LOC AL F UNDS P ROGRAM City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Grants and Go vernment Affairs Manager) J une 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5- Yr. Meas ure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2003-04) Page l of l ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT T YPE TOTAL MEASURE "A" COST FUNDS 1. Annu al Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 200,000 200,000 2. Annual Street Crack Filling (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 75,000 75,000 3. Cape Seal Street Overlays (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 125,000 125,000 4. AHRM Street Overlays Ste ve ns Road 75,000 75,000 5. Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Program) Various Bridges 25,000 25,000 6. Araby Drive Bridge across Araby Wash (HBRR Grant) City 20% Match cost 80% to HBRR Gra nt 2,000,000 200,000 7. Mesqu ite Avenue & El Cielo Traffic Signal I ncreased Traffic from Mid -Valley Parkway 150,000 150,000 8. Annual SB-821 Sidewalk Project Install Co ncrete Sidewalks behind curbs 60,000 40,000 9. Indian Canyon/ I-10 In terchan ge Construction N ew 6 -La ne Intercha nge 15,000,000 1,150,000 10. Indian Canyon Widenin g (across Whitewater Wash) Widen from 2 4 La nes to 3,324,000 1,330,000 2003/04 TOTALS $21,034,000 $3,370,000 000425 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEAS URE " A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGR AM Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Spri ngs Robert L. Mohler (Gra nts and Gover nme nt Affairs Manager) June 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5-Yr. Meas ure A Local Streets & Roads Program (F Y 2004-05) Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS 1. Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 600,000 600,000 2. Annual Street Crack Fillin g (Contract) Various Locations (Co ntract Crews) 75,000 75,000 3. Cape Seal Street Overlays (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 125,000 125,000 4. Calle En cilia Street Widening (Ramo n Rd. to Arenas Rd)- 1/3 mile 485,000 485,000 5. Bridge Misc. Repairs (Ann ual Program) Vario us Bridges 25,000 25,000 6. Ramon Bridge Widen- WW. Wash (HBRR)-Add 2 Lanes Joint w/ Cathedral City/ CVAG (DESIGN) 800,000 40,000 7. Racquet Club & Caballeros Traffic Signal New Signal 150,000 150,000 8. Annu al SB-821 Sidewalk Safety Project Install Concrete Sidewalks behi nd curbs 60,000 40,000 9. Gene Autry Widening across Whitewater Wash Widen from 2 to 4 lanes 3,000,000 750,000 10. Gene Autry Trail at Interstate 10 • Widen from 2 to 6 Lanes 12,000,000 2,000,000 2004/05 TOT ALS $17,320,000 $4,310,000 00* Agency: Prepared by: Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA.I*ORTATION COMMISSION ME ASU RE "A" LOC AL FU NDS P ROGRAM City of Palm Spri ngs Robert L. Mohler (Grants and Government Affairs Manager) Ju ne 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5-Yr. Measure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2005-06) Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE FUNDS 1. Annual Street Slu rry Seals (Contract) Vario us Locations (Contract Crews) 600,000 600,000 2. Annual Street Crack Filling (Contract) Various Locations (Co ntract Crews) 75,000 75,000 3. Cape Seal Street Overlays (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 125,000 125,000 4. Bridge Misc. R epairs (Ann ual Program) Various Bridges 25,000 25,000 5. Ramon Bridge Widen- WW. Wash (HBRR)-Add 2 Lanes Joi nt w/ Cathedral City/ CVAG (CO NSTRUCT) 7,000,000 350,000 6. Alejo Road & Caballeros Traffic Signal New Signal 150,000 150,000 7. Annual SB-821 Sidewalk Safety Project Install Concrete Sidewalks behind curbs 60,000 40,000 2005/06 T OTALS $8,035,000 $1,365,000 000427 RIVERSIDE COUNTY T RANSPO RT ATION COMMISSION MEASU RE "A " LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Gra nts a nd Government Affairs Ma nager) Ju ne 14, 2002 FY 2003-07 5-Yr. Measure A Local Streets & Roads Program (FY 2006-07) Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE FUNDS 1. Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Various Locatio ns (Contract Crews) 600,000 600,000 2. Annual Street Crack Filling (Contract) Vario us Locations (Contract Crews) 75,000 75,000 3. Cape Seal Street Overlays (Contract) Various Locations (Contract Crews) 125,000 125,000 4. Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Program) Various Bridges 25,000 25,000 5. ARHM Pavement Overlay Major or Secondary Thoroughfare 600,000 500,000 6. Traffic Signal Upgrade New Sig nal 150,000 150,000 7. Annual SB-821 Sidewalk Safety Project Install Concrete Sidewalks behind c urbs 60,000. 40,000 2006/07 T OT ALS 51,635,000 51,615,000 " " P A L O V E R D E V A L L E Y 0 0 0 4 2 9 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 0 3 - 2 0 0 7 A g e n c y : C i t y o f B l y t h e P r e p a r e d B y : H e l e n C o l b e r t P h o n e N o . : ( 7 6 0 ) 9 2 2 . 6 1 6 1 D a t e : J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e 1 o f 1 I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E T O T A L C O S T ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) M E A S U R E " A " F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 1 * * 1 9 9 7 / 0 7 H o b s o n w a y R e c o n s t r u c t i o n P r o j e c t $ 7 , 0 0 0 . $ 4 , 5 0 0 . 2 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 L a n e C / R i g h t o f W a y 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 A d m i n i s t r a t i v e O v e r h e a d 1 6 0 . 1 6 0 . 4 2 0 0 0 / 0 3 H o b s o n w a y R R x i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s 1 2 5 . 1 2 5 . 5 2 0 0 1 / 0 4 S . L o v e k i n D e s i g n / W i d e n / R e s u r f a c e ( D e s i g n 0 2 / 0 3 ) 7 5 . 7 5 . 6 1 9 9 8 / 0 4 W h e e l c h a i r R a m p s ( A D A ) ( 5 0 , 0 0 0 / y r f o r 5 y e a r s ) 2 5 0 . 2 5 0 . 7 2 0 0 1 / 0 3 S i d e w a l k I m p r o v e m e n t s ( S a f e R o u t e s ) 5 0 0 . 5 0 . 8 2 0 0 0 / 0 3 A l l e y w a y I m p r o v e m e n t s 2 1 5 . 2 1 5 . 9 2 0 0 0 / 0 3 F o g & C h i p S e a l 1 0 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 0 2 0 0 0 / 0 3 A s p h a l t M a t e r i a l ( S t o c k p i l e / A n n u a l ) 1 7 5 . 1 7 5 . 1 1 2 0 0 3 / 0 4 C o m b i n e d S t r e e t P r o j e c t ( R e p a i r , R e s u r f a c e ) 1 5 0 . 1 5 0 . * * N O T E : C i t y i s a c c u m u l a t i n g M e a s u r e " A " p r o c e e d s t o f u n d I t e m 1 . ; E n g i n e e r i n g i s 1 0 0 % c o m p l e t e . C o n s t r u c t i o n i s t o s t a r t f i s c a l y e a r 2 0 0 2 / 0 3 . P r o j e c t I s c u r r e n t l y o u t t o b i d . 0 0 0 4 3 0 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 V RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to Fiscal Year 2002 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the County of Riverside and the Cities of Moreno Valley and Palm Desert BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the amendment to the FY 02 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plans for Local Streets and Roads for the County of Riverside and the Cities of Moreno Valley and Palm Desert, as submitted. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five-year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive their Measure "A" disbursements. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County (representing the unincorporated area of the Eastern County) must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) along with documentation supporting the calculation. The Measure "A" Plans for the County of Riverside and the Cities of Moreno Valley and Palm Desert were approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2001 meeting. Any revisions to the adopted Plan must be returned to the Commission for approval. The following revisions are being requested: a) The City of Moreno Valley has submitted a revised Plan adding four new projects for FY 2002. b) The City of Palm Desert has submitted a revised Plan for FY 2002 to increase funding to two projects by $800,000 and $1,100,000, add one project at $400,000, and reduce a fourth project by $1,100,000. Item 7V The County of Riverside has submitted a revised Plan for FY 02 to include projects which were incorporated into the County's FY 01-02 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) by various Board actions during the course of the fiscal year. Attachments: 1) City of Moreno Valley Revised FY 2002 Measure "A" Plan 2) City of Palm Desert Revised FY 2002 Measure "A" Plan 3) County of Riverside Revised FY 2002 Measure "A" Plan • • • Item 7V 000432 " A p r i l 3 0 , 2 0 0 2 E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n 3 5 0 U n i v e r s i t y A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 0 1 R i v e r s i d e , C A 9 2 5 0 1 A t t e n t i o n : J e r r y R i v e r a S u b j e c t : M e a s u r e " A " L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s P r o j e c t s A m e n d C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 0 5 9 4 3 8 j e P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t C a p i t a l P r o j e c t s C i t y H a l l 1 4 1 7 7 F r e d e r i c k S t r e e t P . O . B o x 8 8 0 0 5 M o r e n o V a l l e y . C A 9 2 5 5 2 - 0 8 0 5 T e l e p h o n e : ( 9 0 9 ) 4 1 3 - 3 1 3 0 F A X : ( 9 0 9 ) 4 1 3 - 3 1 7 0 T h e C i t y o f M o r e n o V a l l e y h a s a p p r o p r i a t e d f u n d s f r o m i t s M e a s u r e " A " a c c o u n t f o r f o u r n e w p r o j e c t s f o r F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 1 / 2 0 0 2 . T h e C i t y h a s h e r e b y a m e n d e d t h e F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 F i v e Y e a r C a p i t a l P r o g r a m . T h e p r o j e c t s t h a t a r e a p a r t o f t h e p r o g r a m a r e a s f o l l o w s : 1 . D r a c a e a A v e n u e I m p r o v e m e n t s / H e a c o c k S t r e e t t o P e r r i s B o u l e v a r d M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s o f $ 4 2 , 0 0 0 ( A c c o u n t N o . 1 2 5 . 7 6 2 2 1 ) w a s b u d g e t e d f o r d e s i g n o f t h e m i s s i n g s t r e e t i m p r o v e m e n t s . 2 . F r e d e r i c k S t r e e t a n d B r a b h a m S t r e e t T r a f f i c S i g n a l M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s o f $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 w a s b u d g e t e d f o r d e s i g n o f t h e t r a f f i c s i g n a l . $ 1 7 7 , 0 0 0 o f M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s w i l l b e b u d g e t e d i n F i s c a l Y e a r 2 0 0 2 / 2 0 0 3 f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e t r a f f i c s i g n a l f o r a t o t a l p r o j e c t c o s t o f $ 1 8 7 , 0 0 0 ( A c c o u n t N o . 1 2 5 . 8 2 9 2 1 ) . 3 . P e r r i s B o u l e v a r d a n d N o r t h e r n D a n c e r D r i v e T r a f f i c S i g n a l M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s o f $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 w a s b u d g e t e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e t r a f f i c s i g n a l a n d a n e w a c c o u n t w i l l b e e s t a b l i s h e d . T h e t o t a l c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t u s i n g M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s a n d o t h e r f u n d i n g s o u r c e s ( A c c o u n t N o . 4 2 6 . 6 9 0 2 0 ) i s $ 1 8 5 , 6 9 9 . 4 . M e d i a n N o s e M o d i f i c a t i o n s a t V a r i o u s I n t e r s e c t i o n s M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s o f $ 2 7 , 5 0 0 w a s t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e m e d i a n n o s e m o d i f i c a t i o n s a c c o u n t i n t h e t r a f f i c s i g n a l m i t i g a t i o n f u n d f o r a t o t a l p r o j e c t c o s t o f $ 1 4 7 , 4 1 9 ( A c c o u n t N o . 4 2 6 . 7 6 5 2 0 ) . D E C E I V E - 1 T M A Y . 0 2 0 0 2 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y [ R A ' - S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N 0 0 6 0 8 Riverside County Transportation Commission April 30, 2002 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call John Hogard at (909) 413-3137. Sincerely, TRENT D. PULLIAM, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer PR , P.E. 9.471 Assistant City Engineer JH/Ib U:\CAPPROJ\Measure A\5YEAR\2002-07\Letter\D42502 Ament SIP.doc pc: John Hogard Prem Kumar Measure "A" File " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A M O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F Y 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 A g e n c y : C i t y o f P a l m D e s e r t P r e p a r e d b y : J o s e p h S . G a u g u s h , P . E . P h o n e N o . ; 7 6 0 1 3 4 6 . 0 6 1 1 e x t 5 6 6 D a t e : J u n e 1 3 , 2 0 0 2 P a g e 1 I T E M N O . P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S P R O J E C T T Y P E T O T A L C O S T ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) M E A S U R E A F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' S ) 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . 6 . F r e d W a r i n g D r i v e H i g h w a y 1 1 1 t o F a i r h a v e n D r i v e K a n s a s S t r e e t / H o v i e y L a n e E a s t / O a s i s C l u b D r i v e H i g h w a y 1 1 1 � D e s e r t C r o s s i n g / T o y s " R " U s I n t e r s e c t i o n H i g h w a y 7 4 � S i l v e r S p u r M o b i l e M a n o r F r e d W a r i n g D r i v e I m p r o v e m e n t s F r a n k S i n a t r a D r i v e C o o k S t r e e t t o G e r a l d F o r d D r i v e a ) I n c r e a s e f u n d i n g b y $ 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 . b ) D e c r e a s e f u n d i n g b y $ 1 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . c ) . N e w p r o j e c t . d ) I n c r e a s e f u n d i n g b y $ 1 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 . B r i d g e a n d R o a d w a y w i d e n i n g , d r a i n a g e i m p r o v e m e n t s , a n d t r a f f i c s i g n a l m o d i f i c a t i o n s I n t e r s e c t i o n r e a l i g n m e n t a n d t r a f f i c s i g n a l i n s t a l l a t i o n I n t e r s e c t i o n r e a l i g n m e n t a n d t r a f f i c s i g n a l m o d i f i c a t i o n s R i g h t t u r n l a n e a d d i t i o n R o a d w a y w i d e n i n g R o a d w a y w i d e n i n g a n d t r a f f i c s i g n a l 2 , 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 5 0 1 5 0 4 0 0 2 , 5 0 0 2 , 3 0 0 ; ( a ) 3 0 0 ( b ) 3 5 0 1 5 0 4 0 0 ( c ) ' 2 , 5 0 0 ( d ) E / t i 4 I O 2 " G ; P u b W o r k s l 0 o r J a D e L a F u e n t e \ M y D o c u m e n t s \ R C T C \ R O T C F u n d s P r o g r a m P o n n - F Y 0 1 . 0 2 ( r e v l s e d 2 ) . d o c " s d 0 0 0 4 3 5 . 8 W 6 Y = � 0 Z 6 1 1 4 4 1 - u n f S ) I 1 O M 3 1 1 9 1 1 d 1 8 3 S 3 a w l Y d - 0 1 3 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department June 13, 2002 Eric Haley, Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Attn.: Mr. Jerry Rivera Dear Mr. Haley: Attached is the Co portion of Measu expenditures b 2001. =`d five-year progr. or Fiscal Year 2002/2006. enue • ro'ections transmitted b N This amende Y rt the County's i I o: ear 2001/2002 ration Improve various Boar ac If you have a Johnson, Dep David E. Barnhart Director of Transportation ions con tor of RKN: attachment cc: George Johnson Geraldine Gour Scott Barber/Russ Kennedy Roy Null (transmittal only) David E. Barnhart Director of Transportation (15993 TECIEAVIEfi 11 JUN 13 2002 TRAN RISPORTA 0 COUNTY COMMISSION for the County's heduled er of April 25, 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor • Riverside, California 92501 • (909) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 • Riverside, California 92502-1090 • FAX (909) 955-6721 • rated into n (TIP) by 000436 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D e s c r i p t i o n x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 i 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 0 3 r d S t 4 3 0 1 4 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 H a m m o n d R d D a l e K i l e r R d E 0 1 0 0 0 . 2 8 ( m i ) 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d o t h e r C 0 3 7 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y T o t a l 4 0 0 7 t h S t 4 3 0 1 2 5 D 2 0 0 0 0 D a t e P a l m S t D a l e K i l e r R d E 1 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 ( m i ) 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 0 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d o t h e r C 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y T o t a l 2 5 1 0 t h A v e 4 3 0 2 9 8 D 3 0 0 0 0 C & D B l v d I n t a k e B l v d ( R t e 9 5 ) E 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 2 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e c o n s t a n d w i d e n r o a d o t h e r 7 4 C 9 5 0 0 0 0 C o o r d i n a t e w i t h t h e C i t y o f B l y t h e f o r p a v i n g t h e s o u t h 1 / 2 o f t h e r o a d . 3 0 2 M e a s u r e A / P a l o V e r d e T o t a l 1 7 2 1 6 t h A v e 3 3 0 1 5 3 D 0 0 0 2 0 A t l a n t i c A v e E ' l y t o e n d E 0 0 0 1 0 . 2 3 ( m i ) 1 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 1 2 0 W i d e n , R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 0 0 0 3 8 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y T o t a l 5 3 4 6 t h S t 2 3 0 0 1 4 2 D 0 0 3 5 0 0 R i v e r v i e w D r S E ' l y 8 0 0 ' E 0 0 1 . 0 0 . 1 5 ( m i ) 1 8 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e c o n s t a n d W i d e n A C P a v e d R o a d o t h e r C 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 1 4 2 4 8 t h S t 2 3 0 0 8 6 D 3 0 0 0 0 T r o t h S t B a i n S t E 1 0 0 0 0 . 6 2 ( m i ) 1 6 ( f t ) / 1 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 P u l v e r i z e a n d R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 8 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 8 6 6 4 t h S t 2 3 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o w n e y S t A r c h e r S t E 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 5 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) R 0 0 O 0 0 R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d a s p a r t o f a F l o o d C o n t r o l s t o r m d r a i n p r o j e c t . o t h e r C 1 8 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 1 8 0 0 0 4 3 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM fiscal years 2002-2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 2 06/12/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmentat C = Construction Total 01/02 02/03 ( 03/04 f 04/05 105/06 73rd Ave 4 Windlass Dr Ely Windlass Dr .16 mi .16 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurface Paved Road 301 other 26 D E R C 0 0 0 0 301 Measure 2 1 0 23 A/Coachetta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 26 Academy Dr 3 University Ave Cornett St .20 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM 300 other 38 D E R C 300 0 0 0 38 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 38 Alberta Ave 4 Swingle Ave Wly 0.15 mi .15 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 301 other 48 D E R C 301 0 0 0 0 Measure 10 1 0 37 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 48 Alviso Ave 2 Ave Juan Diaz Ply 0.34 mi .34 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 60 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 53 Total 60 Angel Way 3 Malibar Ave S'ty 0.05 mi .05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 15 D E R C 300 0 0 0 15 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 15 Angela Ave 2 58th St N'ty 0.12 mi .12 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM - 300 other 28 D E R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 22 Total 28 Antelope Rd 3 Scott Rd Craig Ave 1.53 (mi) 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) Resurf with 0.17' AHRM 300 other 301 D E R C 300 0 2 0 299 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 301 • • 000438 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 3 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 A r m s t r o n g R d 2 S i e r r a A v e S . B . C o u n t y l i n e 1 . 0 3 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 2 3 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 4 0 1 0 2 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 2 3 A r u b a C t 4 P o r t R o y a l A v e N l y P o r t R o y a l 0 . 0 2 m i . 0 2 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n s t r u c t S u r f a c e 3 0 1 o t h e r 1 1 D E R C 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 1 A t l a n t i c A v e 3 D i l l o n R d 1 6 t h A v e . 5 0 ( m i ) 1 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) W i d e n , R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 9 1 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 5 6 3 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 9 1 A v e S a n T i m o t e o 3 O r c h a r d S t A v e n i d a M i r a v i t t a . 8 7 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 6 3 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 5 9 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 6 3 B a k e r S t 2 K e n n e d y S t L i m o n i t e A v e : 4 2 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e s u r f 0 . 1 7 ' A C 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 1 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 9 4 T o t a l 1 1 0 B a u t i s t a R d 3 N V ' l y B a u t i s t a 4 . 9 5 m i N W ' l y R a n c h R d 1 m i 1 . 7 1 ( m i ) 2 5 ( f t ) / 2 5 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 4 4 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 . 3 1 0 T o t a l 3 4 4 B a u t i s t a R d 3 W i l y R a n c h R d 1 m i F a i r v i e w A v e 2 . 8 7 ( m i ) 2 5 ( f t ) / 2 5 ( f t ) R e c o n s t 3 0 0 o t h e r 7 7 6 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 1 0 7 0 0 - T o t a l 7 7 6 0 0 0 4 3 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM ;Fiscal years 2002-2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 4 06/12/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length.(mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Envi_orrmental C = Construction Total 01/02 02/03 1 03/04 04/05 ( 05/06 Beckman Dr - 4 Jackson St Wily end .12 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 301 other 23 D E R C 0 0 0 23 301 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 23 Belmont Ct 3 Piping Rock Rd S'{y Piping Rock .09mi .09 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 10 D E R C 0 0 0 10 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 Big Pine St 3 Jeffery Pine Rd Silver Fir Dr .20 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Resurf AC paved road 300 other 33 D E R C 3 1 0 29 300 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 33 Blue Hill Dr 3 Griffith Dr Crews Hills Dr .17 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 300 other 28 D E R C 300 0 0 0 28 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 28 Bohlen Rd 3 - Mitchell Rd lily E .50 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/Berms 300 other 103 D R C 300 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 2 1 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 103 Bowden Dr 4 Hopewell Ave Cambridge Ave .25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon AC surface 301 other 50 D E R C 301 0 0 0 50 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Total 50 Boyer Ave 3 Yale St Katharin St .16 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Recon AG paved road surface 300 other 59 D E R C 300 0 0 0 59 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 59 • • 000440 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 5 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 J 0 4 / 0 5 f 0 5 / 0 6 B r a d l e y R d 3 E s t a t e D r C h e r r y H i l t s B l v d . 5 1 ( m i ) 6 2 ( f t ) / 6 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 0 1 D E R C 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 0 1 B r o o k s i d e A v e 3 N a n c y A v e B e a u m o n t A v e . 8 0 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d V e r i f y l i m i t s o f p r o p o s e d a n n e x a t i o n . 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 1 7 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 1 7 B u r g e s s W a y 3 W e s t o v e r W y W i n d s o r D r . 0 8 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 9 D E R C 0 0 0 1 9 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 9 B u t l e r B a y 4 N e v i s P L T r i n i t y C i r . 1 0 ( m i ) 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 3 D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e t l a 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 3 B u t t e r n u t L n 2 R i d g e v i e w T e r r a c e N i l ) , 0 . 0 6 m i . 0 6 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f 0 . 1 2 ' A C 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 3 D E R C 3 0 0 6 1 0 3 6 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 3 C a j a t c o R d 1 L a S i e r r a A v e L a k e M a t h e w s D r 3 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 8 5 5 0 E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 1 0 1 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 1 5 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 6 7 2 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 8 5 5 C a j a t c o R d 1 K i r k p a t r i c k R d L a k e M a t h e w s D r 2 . 7 0 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n s t A C p a v e d r o a d , w i d e n s h o u l d e r s a n d C o n s t r u c t l e f t t u r n p o c k e t s a t A r c h e r R d , K i r k p a t r i c k R d a n d L a k e M a t h e w s D r . 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 2 0 1 2 8 0 0 E R C 3 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 0 2 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 2 5 8 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 7 0 0 9 0 0 4 4 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Cajalco Rd La Sierra Ave 2.70 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Temescal Canyon Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Calico Ave Chaparral Rd .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Cottonwood Rd 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) Calle De Las Flores Clearwater Wy .31 (mi) Resurf AC paved road. Snow View Dr 17 (ft)/ 17 (ft) Camellia Dr Yale St Lois Ct .23 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC, 0.12' AHRM Capitano Dr Piping Rock Rd Wentworth Dr .26 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM Cedar St .Tumbleweed St 52nd St .94 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM Center St 6 various intersection .00 (mi) Const/Retrofit access ramps (ft)/ (ft) Fund Source Total 1 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 4 301 other Totat 3 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 2 300 other Totat 5 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 01/02 02/03 03/04 ! 04/05 105/06 1410 1410 D 0 0 0 180 0 E 0 0 0 20 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 1210 300 Measure A/Western 124 124 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 111 55 55. 44 44 51 51 D 0 5 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 49 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D - 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 44 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 51 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 159 •D E R C 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 .0 0 0 15 1 0 143 13 16 29 R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 000442 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 P a g e 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t C h a b e l a D r S o b o b a R d . 0 7 ( m i ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f S a n J o s e D r 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) C h a m b e r s A v e M u r r i e t a R d . 9 5 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d B r a d l e y R d 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) C h a p a r r a l R d T a m a r a c k R d . 3 7 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d V e r b e n i a A v e 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) C h e r r y C o v e C a l l e D e L a s F l o r e s . 1 4 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d P a l m O a s i s A v e 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) C h e r r y H a t s B l v d V a l l e y B l v d 1 . 4 7 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d B r a d l e y R d 6 2 ( f t ) / 6 2 ( f t ) C l a r k S t M a r t i n S t M a r k h a m S t . 5 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) P u l v e r i z e , R e s u r f 0 . 3 0 ' A C C l a r k S t C a j a l c o R d 1 . 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d M a r t i n S t 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 1 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 1 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 I 0 4 / 0 5 j 0 5 / 0 6 2 3 2 3 D 0 0 5 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 1 7 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 3 0 1 3 0 1 D E R C 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 2 1 5 4 9 4 9 2 5 7 2 5 6 5 1 3 1 0 6 1 0 6 D E R C 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 9 3 D 0 5 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 4 3 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 2 5 7 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 1 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 2 2 5 2 E R 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 O 0 2 3 1 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Total Clearwater Way 4 Calle De Las Flores S'Ly Palm Oasis 0.05mi .16 (mi) 17 (ft)/ 17 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Clinton Keith Rd Avenida La Cresta Murrieta City Limits 1.65 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Reconst road Coordinate with the City of Murrieta for the west half of 0.3 miles of road. 1 301 other Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 01/02 t 02/03 103/04 04/05 105/06 32 Total 32 D E R C 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 300 other Total Clinton St Miles Ave S'ty to C.L. .25 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Resurf west 1/2 of AC paved road 4 605 605 D E R C 60 5 0 540 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 301 other 345 Total 345 D E R C 35 2 0 1 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 307 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 Coachella Valley Area various roads 6.00 (mi) Resurf (ft)/ (ft) 4 301 other Total Colgate Ct Fulton Ave S'Ly 0.05 mi .05 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 3 Collegian Way Columbia St Major Dr .19 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM 3 2130 2610 4740 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 130 0 0 0 850 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 200 0 0 800 300 other Total 300 other Total Collegian Way Cornell St E'ly 0.12 mi .12 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM 3 300 other 12 12 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 12 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 43 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 43 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Total 48 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 48 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 000444 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y - T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 9 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 ( 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 ' 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 C o l o r a d o R i v e r R d 4 3 0 2 1 1 5 D 2 0 0 0 0 6 t h A v e N ' t y 0 . 6 0 m i E 1 0 0 0 0 . 6 0 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 1 1 2 - 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 M e a s u r e A / P a l o V e r d e T o t a t 1 1 5 C o n t o u r A v e 3 3 0 0 2 0 3 D 2 0 0 0 0 H a n s e n A v e E l y E 1 0 0 0 0 . 6 6 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d C o n s t r u c t i n s u m m e r w h e n s c h o o l i s o u t . o t h e r C 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 W a t e r c r o s s e s o v e r t h e r o a d . 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 2 0 3 C o r a l S t 4 3 0 1 6 5 D 0 6 0 0 0 C a l l e D e L a s F l o r e s S ' l y P a l m O a s i s 0 . 0 5 m 1 E 0 1 0 0 0 . 1 9 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 0 5 8 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y T o t a l 6 5 C o r r a l S t 2 3 0 0 2 7 D 0 0 0 0 5 H o m e s t e a d S t P l y H o m e s t e a d 0 . 1 9 m i ' E 0 0 0 0 1 . 1 9 ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M o t h e r C 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 2 7 C o r y d o n S t 1 3 0 0 3 6 3 D 2 0 0 0 0 0 G r a n d A v e M i s s i o n T r E 0 1 0 0 0 1 . 5 6 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 1 / 2 i n t h e C i t y o f L a k e E l s i n o r e . P u r s u e c o o p o t h e r C 0 3 4 2 0 0 0 w / C i t y . F u n d s r e p r e s e n t h a l f w i d t h i m p r o v e m e n t s . 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 3 6 3 C o t t o n w o o d R d 3 T a m a r a c k 3 0 0 2 6 0 D 0 0 0 0 2 5 R d V e r b e n i a A v e E 0 0 0 0 1 . 4 5 ( m i ) 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 2 6 0 C r e w s H i l l D r 3 3 0 0 2 8 D 0 0 0 0 0 W ' l y G r i f f i t h 0 . 0 3 m i B l u e H i l t D r E 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 6 ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M o t h e r C 2 8 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 2 8 0 0 0 4 4 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) Crystal Springs Dr Calle De Las Flores .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Supv.Dist EW (ft)/PW (ft) Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction - Total 4 301 52 De Portola Rd (2 segments) S'ly Monte De Oro .5mi Glen Oaks Rd 4.25 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Reconst AC paved road Segment 2 is from Anza Rd to Pauba Rd other Total 52 01/02 102/03 03/04 ( 04/05 105/06 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 46 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 3 300 1702 other Total 1702 Delano Dr Toll Gate Rd .27 (mi) Resurf AC paved road ?Illy end 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) 3 300 41 other Total 41 Dillon Rd. ►Jorsley Diablo Rd 1.00 (mi) 25 (ft)/ 25 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road Coordinate with City of Palm Springs for 10% share of project 3 301 85 other 10 Total 95 Dillon Rd Long Canyon Rd 2.00 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Bennett Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) D 161 E 112 R 0 C 1 0 0 0 1428 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 0 1 0 0 O 0 0 38 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 82 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 301 121 Double Tree Dr Jeffery Pine Rd .15 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Silver Fir Dr 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) other 565 Total 686 . D 0 0 E 0 0 R 0 0 C 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 3 300 36 other Total 36 Double View Dr Meadow Glen Dr W'ly 1.21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) D E R C 3 0 0 1 0 0 O 0 0 32 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 300 228 other Total 228 D 5 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 222 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 000446 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 1 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d - S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = W a y D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f 9 9 A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 E l R a n c h o D r 3 B r a d l e y R d P i p i n g R o c k R d . 4 8 ( m i ) 3 8 ( f t ) / 3 8 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 1 6 D E R C 0 0 0 1 1 6 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 1 6 E l a i n e D r 3 S y c a m o r e R d 1 6 t h A v e " . 4 4 ( m i ) 3 3 ( f t ) / 3 3 ( f t ) R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 5 9 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 2 1 0 5 6 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 5 9 E l m A v e 3 1 4 t h S t B e a u m o n t C . L . . 4 9 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C i t y o f B e a u m o n t f o r h a l f o f r o a d w i d t h . 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 0 3 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 0 3 E l s a C t 3 L o i s C t C a m e l l i a D r . 0 5 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) R e m o v e p a v e m e n t , R e s u r f 0 . 1 3 ' A C a n d 0 . 1 2 ' A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 3 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 3 E s t a t e D r 3 3 0 0 1 2 D 0 0 0 0 0 B r a d l e y R d P i p i n g R o c k R d E 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 5 ( m i ) 3 8 ( f t ) / 3 8 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M o t h e r C 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 1 2 E t h a n a c R d 3 3 0 0 6 0 4 D 7 5 0 0 0 0 G o e t z R d E ' l y t o P e r r i s C . L . E 1 0 0 0 0 1 . 7 5 ( m i ) 1 2 ( f t ) / 1 2 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 R e c o n S o u t h s i d e o f r o a d o t h e r 6 5 9 C 2 5 2 6 0 0 0 C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C i t y f o r n o r t h s i d e o f r o a d . C i t y S h a r e i s l i s t e d a s u n f u n d e d . 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 1 2 6 3 E u c a l y p t u s S t 3 3 0 0 3 7 D 0 0 0 5 0 E s p e r a n z a A v e I d a A v e E 0 0 0 1 0 . 1 7 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 G r i n d a n d R e s u r f o t h e r C 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 3 7 0 0 0 4 4 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fleetwood Dr Via Cerro Wilson St .70 (mi) 62 (ft)/ 62 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmentat C = Construction Total 2 300 253 Fordham Dr Trenton Wy Windsor Dr .09 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 253 01/02 02/03 103/04 04/05 { 05/06 3 300 19 Four Chimneys Rd Delano Dr .10 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Wily end 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) other Total 19 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 19 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 300 16 other Total 16 Fred Waring Dr & Clinton St Indio C.L. Wily Silverwood Dr .58 (mi) 64 (ft)/110 (ft) Widen street and Const sidewalk Sidewalk includes the west side of Clinton St from Fred Waring Dr to Riverlane Dr. D E R C 2 0 13 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 301 201 Fremontia Rd Tamarack Rd .37 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Cottonwood Rd 60 (ft)/ 60 (ft) other 48 Total 249 3 300 215 Fulton Ave Dartmouth St Stanford St .27 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 215 D 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 201 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 21 1 0 193 3 300 62 Galena St Rutite St .75 (mi) Recon AC paved road Felspar St 71 (ft)/ 71 (ft) other Total 62 2 300 375 other 410 Total 785 D E R C 0 0 0 62 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0- E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 375 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 000448 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) P a g e 1 3 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t G a r b a n i R d M u r r i e t a R d E v a n s R d . 4 3 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) R e c o n 2 4 ' - 5 3 ' , A C p a v e d r o a d W i d t h v a r i e s f r o m 2 4 ' t o 5 3 ' . G e n e S t W h i t t i e r A v e . 0 5 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 2 6 2 2 6 2 0 1 / 0 2 ( 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 D 9 0 R 0 C 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ' t y e n d 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) G i l m a n S p r i n g s R d S E ' l y J a c k R a b b i t T r N W ' l y B r i d g e S t 1 . 8 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n s t a n d w i d e n A C P a v e d R o a d C o o r d i n a t e w / p r o j e c t A 2 - 0 4 3 3 i n S u p v . D i s t . 3 . 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 2 T o t a l 5 G i l m a n S p r i n g s R d S E ' l y B r i d g e S t 1 . 5 0 ( m i ) R e c o n s t A C P a v e d R d S H 7 9 ( S a n d e r s o n R d ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l G i l m a n S p r i n g s R d 2 l o c a t i o n s N W ' l y J a c k R a b b i t T r S E ' t y B r i d g e S t . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n , r e a l i g n S e e A 7 - 0 3 1 0 i n S u p v . D i s t . 5 f o r c o m p a n i o n p r o j e c t G l e n o a k s R d R a n c h o C a l i f o r n i a R d 2 . 7 6 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 2 3 3 5 1 3 6 6 1 7 0 1 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 2 9 4 3 T o t a l 3 0 5 5 E ' l y 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 8 3 7 T o t a l G r a n i t e H i t t D r P y r i t e S t 1 . 7 2 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d V a l t e y W a y 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) 2 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 8 3 7 8 2 9 8 2 9 D E R C 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 1 5 0 0 0 0 C 1 0 5 2 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n D E R C 1 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 2 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 1 0 E 5 R 0 C 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 1 5 E 0 1 R 0 0 C 0 1 0 0 0 8 1 2 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmentat C = Construction Greenwald Ave 5 300 SH 74 Canyon Lake City Limit 2.61 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Pulverize, Resurf 0.33' AC other Project is 31% in SD #3, and 3% in SD #1 Total 410 200 610 D E R C 01/02 1 02/03 03/04 04/05 1 05/06 53 2 0 355 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Griffith Dr 3 300 El Rancho Dr Crews Hills Dr .20 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 44 Grosse Point Dr 3 300 Cherry Hilts Blvd Mc Call Blvd .24 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other This project is to complete a portion of project A90560 which was delayed for proposed waterline Total 44 D E R C 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 76 D. 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 76 0 0 300 Measure A/Western . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hansen Ave 3 300 10th St Montgomery Ave 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/berms other Total 203 203 D 0 0 2 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 200 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hattie Ave 3 300 Elm St E'ly end .14 (mi) 22'(ft)/ 22 (ft) Grind and Resurf other Total 30 30 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 5 1 0 24 0 0 0 0 Helen Ave 4 301 Clinton Ave Wly 0.4 mi .40 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 101 101 Helen Ave 3 300 Elm St E'ly end .07 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Grind and Resurf other 19 Total 19 D E R C 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D 0 0 E 0 0 R 0 0 C 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 5 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 • • 000450 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 5 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t . x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 1 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 H e l m C i r 4 B e a c o n D r N ' l y B e a c o n D r 0 . 3 m i . 3 0 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 7 D E R C 2 1 0 4 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 7 H e m p s t e a d C t 3 P l y W i n d s o r 0 . 0 5 m i W ' l y W i n d s o r 0 . 0 4 m i . 0 9 ( m i ) 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 8 D E R C 0 0 0 1 8 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 8 H e r m i t a g e D r 4 N l y 4 2 n d A v 0 . 1 5 m i N l y 4 2 n d A v 0 . 2 4 m i . 0 9 ( m i ) 1 8 ( f t ) / 1 8 ( f t ) R e m o v e a n d R e p l a c e A C S u r f a c e 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 3 D E R C 0 0 0 2 3 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 3 H i g h g r o v e A r e a 5 v a r i o u s s t r e e t s . 0 0 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 1 0 0 6 3 5 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 9 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 9 0 T o t a l 1 7 3 5 H o m e s t e a d S t 2 L i m o n i t e A v e S t i r r u p S t . 3 1 ( m i ) 3 6 ( f t ) / 3 6 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 4 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 8 T o t a l 4 4 H o p e w e l l A v e 4 4 2 n d A v e N ' l y e n d . 2 6 ( m i ) 2 5 ( f t ) / 2 5 ( f t ) R e c o n A C s u r f a c e 3 0 1 o t h e r 4 6 D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 6 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 6 . H u d s o n S t 2 5 8 t h S t N ' l y 0 . 1 2 m i . 1 2 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 5 6 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 5 0 T o t a l 5 6 0 0 0 4 5 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Ironwood Ave Theodore Ave 1.37 (mi) Badlands Landfill (ft)/ (ft) Reimburse Waste Management for advanced funds on Project A2-0507. 5 Jackie Dr Poppy Dr S'ly 0.22 mi .22 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 3 Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C-= Construction 01/02 ( 02/03 103/04 ( 04/05 05/06 300 other Total 300 other Total 70 70 43 43 Jamaica Sands Dr 42nd Ave N'ly 42nd Ave 0.46 mi .46 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurface Paved Road w/Fabric 4 301 other Total 97 97 D E R C 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 43 0 0 0 0 D E R 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 Jamestown Dr Windsor Dr Trenton Wy .08 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 3 300 other Total 19 19 D E R C 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jeffery Pine Rd Cedar Glen Dr W'ly .20 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 3 300 other Total John Muir Rd Lodge Rd .21 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Seneca Dr 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) 3 300 other 47 47 D E R C 3 1 0 43 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Total Johnston Ave San Jacinto St Ply Stanford 0.12 mi 1.68 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Grind and Resurf AC paved road 3 300 other Total 48 D E R C 3 1 0 44 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 107 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 7 0 0 • • • 000452 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 7 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) S u p v . D i s t E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) F i n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 J u n i p e r F l a t s R d 3 3 0 0 2 0 2 D 0 0 1 0 0 J u n i p e r S p r i n g s 1 . 6 1 S l y E 0 0 1 0 0 ( m i ) 2 2 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n R 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 ' , 0 . 5 ' D G , 0 . 2 1 ' R M S W / B e r m s o t h e r C 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 2 0 2 J u r u p a R d E t i w a n d a 2 3 0 0 7 3 3 D 6 0 0 0 0 0 A v e 2 . 9 0 P o i n s e t t a P l E 3 0 0 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 7 3 3 K a t h a r i n S t W h i t t i e r 3 3 0 0 3 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 A v e . 1 5 N E ' l y e n d E 0 0 0 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 3 0 K i n g A v e V a n 1 3 0 0 1 1 9 D 0 2 0 0 0 0 B u r e n B l v d K r a m e r i a A v e E 0 1 0 0 0 . 1 6 ( m i ) R e c o n s t 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 0 9 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 1 1 9 L a S i e r r a A v e E l S o b r a n t e 1 3 0 0 5 2 4 D 0 0 0 0 0 R d 1 . 9 0 C l e v e l a n d A v e E 1 2 5 1 5 0 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 6 4 ( f t ) W i d e n 4 R 0 0 0 0 0 t o l a n e M t n . A r t e r i a l H w y A g r e e m e n t w i t h V i c t o r i a G r o v e , L L C . o t h e r 2 0 0 C 3 8 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 7 2 4 L a V i d a D r C a l l e 4 3 0 1 6 1 D 0 6 0 0 0 D e L a s F l o r e s P a l m O a s i s A v e E 0 1 0 0 0 . 1 8 ( m i ) R e s u r f 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 0 5 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y T o t a l 6 1 L a k e L n T o l l 3 3 0 0 3 6 D 3 0 0 0 0 G a t e R d M a r i a n V i e w D r E 1 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 ( m i ) R e s u r f 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 0 ( f t ) R 0 0 0 0 0 A C p a v e d r o a d o t h e r C 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n T o t a l 3 6 - - T 0 0 0 4 5 ' . 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Lake St 3 300 Acacia Ave Stetson Ave 1.00 (mi) 21 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total Lakeview Ave 3 300 Ramona Expressway Nuevo Rd 3.05 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Recon 30', 0.25' AC other Add turn lanes at Post Office. Total Lakeview Ave 3 300 10th St 12th St 1.11 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Reconst other Total Larksong St 3 300 Plumrose St Whittier St .09 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total Lasso Ct 2 300 Corral St S'ly Corral 0.05 mi .05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total Leon Rd 3 300 Olive Ave N'ly 0.13 mi .13 (mi) (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const AC paved road other This project will complete a segment deleted from project A7-0303. Environmental clearance Total Leon_Rd (3 segments) 3 300 SH 79 (N) to Keller Rd Olive Rd to Simpson Rd 5.10 (mi) (ft)/ 26 (ft) Construct AC paved road other Third segment Scott Rd to Holland Rd. Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 149 149 01/02 ( 02/03 103/04 04/05 05/06 E R C 0 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1179 D 23 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 1156 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 359 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 359 24 24 00 Measure A/Western 33 1 0 325 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 24 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 7 7 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 8 D E R C 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 D E R ,C O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 3 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 060454, " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 1 9 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 1 0 3 / 0 4 J 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 L i m o n i t e A v e 2 E t i w a n d a A v e B a i n S t 1 . 0 0 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 4 2 ( f t ) C o n s t c o n t i n u o u s l e f t t u r n l a n e 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 8 3 4 5 0 D E R C 7 1 1 6 0 3 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 9 3 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 3 3 L i m o n i t e A v e / R i v e r v i e w D r 2 M o r t o n A v e M i s s i o n B l v d 4 . 1 0 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) - R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 6 9 1 1 1 9 6 D E R C 1 3 5 3 0 4 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 5 4 9 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 8 8 7 L o c k h a r t L n 3 J a c k i e D r P l y 0 . 0 7 m i . 0 7 ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 3 D E R C 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 3 L o c o v i a C t 4 P o r t R o y a l A v e N ' l y e n d . 0 2 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e c o n A C s u r f a c e 3 0 1 o t h e r 1 1 D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 1 L o i s C t 3 E l s a C t C o l u m b i a S t . 2 0 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 6 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 3 6 L o r i m e r S t 1 G r a n d A v e S l y . 3 0 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 0 2 D E R C 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 0 2 L o s . C a b a t l o s 3 P a u b a A v e S H 7 9 1 . 3 4 ( m i ) 2 4 " ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 5 2 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 . 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 5 2 O O 9 4 5 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) ELI (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Magnolia Ave median Temescal St Granite St 2.00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Const L.turn lanes, install landscaping, modify signals at Grant St & Byron St. 2 Major Dr Academy Dr Collegian Wy .04 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.13' AC and 0.12' AHRM 3 300 other Total 300 other Total Malaga Rd Mission Tr E'ty .26 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road Coordinate with the City of Lake Elsinore for the north 1/2 of street. 1 Malibar Ave Yale St Ply 0.12 mi .12 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 3 Maple Rd Atlantic Ave .31 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Nancy Dr 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) 3 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 " D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmentat C = Construction 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 105/06 204 5160 5364 D E R C 4 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 87 87 E R 0 ,0 0 10 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 12 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 74 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 21 21 D E R C 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 other Total Marian View Dr S.H.243 Wily .49 (mi) Resurf AC paved road 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) 3 300 other 49 49 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 46 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 61 Total Market St Bridge Santa Ana River .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Seismic retrofit of bridge and replace guardrail 2 300 other 61 D E R C 3 1 0 57 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 1972 , Total 2153 D E R e 0 0 0 181 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 000456 " " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M P a g e 2 1 F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l M a u n a L o a D r M o j a v e ? A y . 3 1 ( m i ) R e c o n 3 2 ' , 0 . 5 ' D G , 0 . 2 1 ' R M S 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) 3 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l M a y b e r r y A v e C o l u m b i a S t . 5 0 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d D a r t m o u t h S t 4 0 ( f t ) / 4 0 ( f t ) 3 M c C a l l B l v d V a l l e y B l v d 1 . 3 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f a c e A C p a v e d r o a d I - 2 1 5 7 2 ( f t ) / 7 2 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 4 8 4 8 3 7 T o t a l 3 7 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 , ( 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 5 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y D E R C 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l M e a d o w G l e n D r D o u b l e V i e w D r I d y t l b r o o k D r . 3 1 ( m i ) 2 2 ( f t ) / 2 2 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d C o o r d i n a t e w i t h w a t e r l i n e w o r k 3 M i r a L o m a A r e a v a r i o u s r o a d s 8 . 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d ( f t ) / % ( f t ) 2 1 1 0 3 7 1 0 3 8 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 5 1 5 1 D E R C 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 3 0 E 1 0 R 0 0 C 4 7 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l M i s s i o n B l v d U P R R X - i n g 3 - 5 1 . 3 4 - C P l y o f V a l l e y W a y . 0 5 ( m i ) 4 8 ( f t ) / ( f t ) U p g r a d e C r o s s i n g G a t e s , r e s u r f r o a d & d r a i n a g e M i s s i o n T r C o r y d o n S t M a l a g a R d 1 . 5 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 4 8 ( f t ) R e c o n s t a n d w i d e n A C p a v e d r o a d H a l f i n t h e C i t y o f L a k e E l s i n o r e T h e c i t y w i l l r e i m b u r s e M e a s u r e A f u n d s o v e r 7 2 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 3 5 0 1 0 0 2 4 5 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 6 6 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 5 0 0 0 3 5 0 9 0 4 8 2 T o t a l 5 7 2 D E R C 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 4 3 D . 0 0 0 0 E 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 6 C 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 7 8 9 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n - 0 0 0 4 5 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 22 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Mojave Rd Carol Dr .10 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road Nancy Dr 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Monte�]j Vista Dr Baxter Rd 1.23 (mi) Resurf 28',0.21'AC Bundy Canyon Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Monterey Ave Varner Rd .60 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Ramon Rd 50 (ft)/ 50 (ft) Murrieta Rd Corson Ave 1.25 (mi) Recon AC paved road Newport Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Murrieta Rd Scott Rd 1.75 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Corson Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Nancy Dr Dillon Rd N'ty to end .33 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, Resurf RMS paved road Nandina Ave Barton St Clark St 1.52 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Pulverize, Resurf 0.30' AC Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Total 3 301 other Total 1 300 other Total 4 301 other Total 3 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 3 301 other Total 1 300 other Total Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornnental C = Construction. 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 105/06 19 19 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 174 174 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 170 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 423 589 718 718 218 218 64 64 D 61 0 0 0 E 3 0. 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 3 99 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 5 0 0 713 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 5 0 0 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2 E 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 13 C 0 0 0 48 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 196 196 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 196 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 00'04:5{8 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 2 3 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 ` 0 2 / 0 3 ( 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 N e p t u n e D r 4 F l a m i n g o D r N l y V i a C o s t a B r a v a . 2 m i . 2 5 ( m i ) 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 4 4 D E R C 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 2 1 0 4 1 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 4 - N e v i s P l 4 B u t l e r B a y P t T r i n i t y C i r . 0 9 ( m i ) 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) R e c o n s t r u c t S u r f a c e 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 3 D E R C 0 0 0 2 3 3 0 1 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 3 N e w B e d f o r d R d 3 W e s t o v e r W y W i n d s o r D r . 0 9 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 3 D E R C 0 0 0 2 3 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 3 N e w C h i c a g o A v e - 3 A l t o D r A c a c i a A v e . 1 3 ( m i ) 1 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n s u r f a c e a n d w i d e n r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r . 2 0 5 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 2 1 2 0 1 8 2 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 2 0 5 4 7 N o r t h S h o r e D r 4 F l a m i n g o D r N l y V i a C o s t a B r a v a . 1 m i . 2 7 ( m i ) 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 2 1 0 4 4 A / C o a c h e l l a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 7 N o r t h w o o d D r 3 C h e r r y H i l l s B l v d M c C a l l B l v d . 3 4 ( m i ) 4 0 ( f t ) / 4 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 7 7 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 7 7 O a k m o n t D r 3 B r a d l e y R d T h o r n h i l l D r . 5 0 ( m i ) 3 6 ( f t ) / 3 6 ( f t ) R e s u r f 3 6 ' , 0 . 1 7 ' A C 3 0 0 o t h e r 9 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 9 0 0 0 0 4 5 9 3 E �� RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 24 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) ELI (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Otd Elsinore Rd S'ly Rider 0.85 mi 2.32 (mi) Resurf AC paved road San Jacinto Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Opal St 45th St .25 (mi) Const sidewalk 43rd St (ft)/ (ft) Orchard St Nancy Ave .71 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Beaumont Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Oreana Way Calle De Las Flores .20 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Palm Oasis Ave 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Palm Oasis Ave Snow View Dr .36 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Clearwater Wy 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Pato Verde Area various roads .00 (mi) Resurf RMS paved road (ft)/ (ft) Patomar Rd John Muir Rd .27 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Dickenson Rd 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Fund Source Totat 5 300 other Total 2 300 other Total 3 300 other Total 4 301 other Total 4 301 other Total 4 302 other Total. 3 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 01/02 ( 02/03 03/04 J 04/05 ( 05/06 758 758 D E R C 95 2 0 2 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 659 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 21 44 65 196 196 D E R C 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 19 1 0 176 0 0 0 0 67 67 121 121 D 0 6 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 60 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 11 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 109 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 610 2450 3060 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0 135 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 225 47 47 D 3 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 43 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 000460 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T P a g e 2 5 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e S u p v . D i s t L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l . 0 = C o n s t r u c t i o n T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 ( 0 2 / 0 3 I 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 P a r D r 3 T h o r n h i l l D r O l y m p i a W a y . 2 6 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e s u r f 3 2 ' , 0 . 2 1 ' A C P e t r o m a t 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 8 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 1 1 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 3 8 P a s e o G r a n d e 2 V i a D e l R i o H u m m i n g b i r d L n . 4 4 ( m i ) 3 7 ( f t ) / 3 7 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 5 7 D E R C 3 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 6 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 1 5 7 P a u b a R d 3 S H 7 9 D e P o r t o l a R d 2 . 3 4 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 6 1 8 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 5 3 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 6 1 8 P e a c h S t 3 E s p e r a n z a A v e I d a A v e . 1 7 ( m i ) 2 2 ( f t ) / 2 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 4 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 3 4 P e b b l e B e a c h D r 3 C h e r r y H i l l s B l v d M c C a l l B l v d . 3 7 ( m i ) 4 0 ( f t ) / 4 0 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r 5 5 4 4 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 9 9 P e d t e y A r e a 2 v a r i o u s r o a d s 7 . 0 0 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d s 3 0 0 o t h e r 8 2 0 D E R C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 M e a s u r e 0 0 0 0 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 3 5 5 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 T o t a l 8 2 0 P i g e o n P a s s R d 5 M o r e n o V a l l e y C . L . 0 . 7 m i l e N o r t h M . V . C . L . 7 0 ( m i ) 1 8 ( f t ) / 1 8 ( f t ) R e c o n a n d r e a l i g n A C p a v e d r o a d 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 4 3 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e 7 0 4 2 0 2 A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T o t a l 4 4 3 0 O q 4 6 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 26 06/12/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Description (Comments) Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 51000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction Total 01/02 02/03 03/04 f 04/05 1 05/06 Pilot Dr 4 Galley Dr N'ty Galley Dr 0.03 mi .03 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Reconstruct Surface 301 other 11 D E R C 301 D E R C 301 2 1 0 8 Measure 0 0 0 0 Measure 0 0 0 0 A/Coachella 2 1 0 32 A/Coachella 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 11 Pilot Dr 4 Windlass Dr E'ty 0.20 mi .20 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurface Paved Road 301 other 35 Total 35 Pine Crest Dr 2 300 152 D .12 0 0 0 0 Paseo Grande Serfas Club Dr E 1 0 0 0 0 .61 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 139 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 152 Pinehurst Rd 3 300 96 D 0 0 0 0 0 Bradley Rd Piping Rock Rd E 0 0 0 0 0 .47 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf with AHRM other C 96 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 96 Piping Rock Rd 3 300 39 D 0 0 0 0 0 Belmont Ct 1220' S'ty E 0 0 0 0 0 .18 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 39 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 39 Plum St 3 300 37 D 0 0 0 5 0 Esperanza Ave Ida Ave E 0 0 0 1 0 .17 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Grind and Resurf other C 0 0 0 31 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 37 Ptumrose St 3 300 32 D 0 0 0 0 0 Cornell St E'ty 0.19 mi E 0 0 0 0 0 .19 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Remove pavement, Resurf 0.15' AC and 0.12' AHRM other C 32 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 32 • s `0 0462 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 P a g e 2 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 P o r t R o y a l A v e H e r m i t a g e D r . 3 8 ( m i ) R e c o n s t r u c t S u r f a c e C a m b r i d g e A v e 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 1 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 7 5 7 5 P o r t R o y a l A v e C a m b r i d g e A v e . 2 2 ( m i ) R e c o n A C s u r f a c e J a m a i c a S a n d s D r 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l P o r t e r A v e K r a m e r i a A v e V a n B u r e n B l v d . 1 6 ( m i ) 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) P u l v e r i z e a n d R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 1 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l P r i m r o s e L n 3 V i o l a S t E ' l y 0 . 0 5 m i . 0 5 . ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) R e m o v e p a v e m e n t , R e s u r f 0 . 1 5 ' A C a n d 0 . 1 2 ' A H R M 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l R a m o n R d S a n M i g u e l i t o D r 3 . 4 0 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d 1 0 0 0 P a l m s C y n R d 2 4 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l . R a m o n R d V a r n e r R d I - 1 0 E B r a m p s . 3 1 . ( m i , ) 4 2 ( f t ) / 4 2 ( f t ) R e c o n p o r t i o n s o f p a v e m e n t w i t h c o n c r e t e C o n s t r u c t w i t h i n t e r i m r a m p p r o j e c t B 1 0 6 3 2 . 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l D E R C 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 4 6 4 6 5 1 5 1 D E R C 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 3 1 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 9 1 1 1 6 3 1 5 5 4 1 2 3 5 0 1 6 2 4 R a n c h o C a l i f o r n i a R d D e L u z R a 3 . 3 9 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d T e m e c u l a C . L . 3 1 ( f t ) / 3 1 ( f t ) 1 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 2 3 9 T o t a l 1 2 3 9 D E R C 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R c 1 4 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 4 6 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 9 2 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 ' . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) • Supv.Dist EW (ft)/PW (ft) Reche Canyon Rd _Arroyo Dr .40 (mi) Realign road N'ly 0.4 mi 26 (ft)/ 40 (ft) 5 Fund Source Total 300 other Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction 01/02 02/03 ' 03/04 104/05 ( 05/06 188 396 Total 584 D E R C 0 0 0 188 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Record Rd Potter Rd .75 (mi) Grind and Resurf SH 79 13 (ft)/ 13 (ft) 3 300 other Total Redford Ct Pebble Beach Dr SW'ly 0.03 mi .03 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Remove pavement, Resurf 0.21' AC 3 300 other Total 80 80 10 10 Ridgeview Ter Frontage Rd .44 (mi) Resurf AC paved road Via Santiago (ft)/ (ft) 2 300 other Total. River Rd Bridge Santa Ana River .12 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Bridge Replacement RCTD Br.# S8002, State Br#. 56C 017 RCTD is working to secure the local matching 2 300 other Total Riverview Dr Limonite Ave 1.87 (mi) Reconstruct surface and widen Ave Juan Diaz 25 (ft)/ 28 (ft) 2 300 other Total Roble Dr Encino Rd .18 (mi) Resurf AC paved road S'ly End 23 (ft)/ 23 (ft) 3 300 other Total 199 199 D 0 0 8 E 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 71 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 10 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 D 25 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 173 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 23019 23104 1238 1238 34 34 D E R C 45 16 0 24 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 125 5 0 1 0 0 0 1107 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 7 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 26 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 000464 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 P a g e 2 9 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t R o c k y W a y D o u b l e T r e e D r W i l y . 0 5 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) 3 F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x 5 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x 5 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 2 1 2 1 R o u n d R o b i n D r S H 2 4 3 . 1 3 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d S W ' t y E n d 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 9 9 9 9 R o y a l C i r J a c k i e D r P l y 0 . 0 7 m i . 0 7 ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 1 8 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n D 2 1 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 7 7 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 R u b i d o u x B l v d U P R R X i n g 3 - 5 4 . 7 0 - C . 0 5 ( m i ) 7 0 ( f t ) / ( f t ) U p g r a d e C r o s s i n g g a t e s a n d r o a d s u r f a c e 2 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l R u s t i c L n O p a l S t . 2 6 ( m i ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d P a c i f i c A v e 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) 2 3 0 0 o t h e r D E R C 0 0 0 1 2 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 7 5 4 3 2 5 0 7 2 4 1 T o t a l S a g e R d E a s t B e n t o n R d 5 . 4 9 ( m i ) R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d S ' l y 5 . 4 9 m i . 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) 3 S a g e R d S H 7 9 4 . 7 8 ( m i ) R e c o n R M S p a v e d r o a d W i l s o n V a l l e y R d 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 2 4 1 D E R c 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 4 0 T o t a l 1 6 4 0 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 4 2 4 T o t a l 1 4 2 4 D E R C 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 1 6 2 6 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 D E R e 5 1 0 1 4 1 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal. years 2002-2006 Page 30 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Sagebrush Ave 3 300 Wily Cottonwood 0.02mi Verbenia Ave .14 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviornmental C = Construction 01/02 02/03 1 03/04 j 04/05 ( 05/06 45 Total 45 D 0 0 0 0 5 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 39 300 Measure A/Western Sail Cir 4 301 Lighthouse Rd Ely Lighthouse 0.04 mi .04 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurface Paved Road other 9 Total 9 D 0 2 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0. 0 C 0 6 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 San Jacinto Rd 3 300 Fern Valley Rd Glen Rd .38 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total San Sevaine Channel/Van Buren Blvd 2 300 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Road improvements associated with construction other of the Flood Control Project of San Sevaine Channel Stage 7. Total 62 62 D 3 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 58 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 303 303 D 3 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 300 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 San Timoteo Cyn Rd 5 300 Redlands Blvd S.B. County Line 1.20 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other 50% in SD#3 Total 532 532 D E R C 70 5 0 457 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sandra Dr 4 301 Jackson St Wily end .11 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 24 Santa Rosa Mine Rd 1 300 Lake Matthews/Gavilan Christmas Tree Ln 2.50 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf exist RMS paved road other Total 24 D 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 24 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 665 665 D 3 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 662 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • 000466 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) P a g e 3 1 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t S a t u r n C l a y M a l i b a r A v e S ' l y 0 . 0 5 m i . 0 5 ( m i ) 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M F u n d S o u r c e F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 T o t a l . M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 ! 0 3 / 0 4 1 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l S c o t t R d 1 - 2 1 5 5 . 0 0 ( m i ) R e c o n s t r u c t A C p a v e d r o a d a n d i n v e s t i g a t e w i d e n i n g . t o 4 l a n e s . R C T D i s s e e k i n g f u n d s f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n . S c o t t R d M u r r i e t a R d 2 . 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d 3 W i n c h e s t e r R d ( S H 7 9 N ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 1 3 1 3 8 0 7 8 0 7 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 5 3 6 1 8 2 0 0 8 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S e a G u l l D r V i a C o s t a B r o v a . 5 7 ( m i ) R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 1 - 2 1 5 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 2 0 1 6 8 1 8 8 2 D E R C 5 0 8 0 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F l a m i n g o D r 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l S e a h o r s e W a y B a r n a c l e D r . 1 2 . ( m i ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d P o r t C i r 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) 4 S e e l e y A v e 4 A r r o w h e a d B l v d N e i g h o u r s B l v d ( R t e 7 8 ) 1 . 0 0 ( m i ) 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) R e s u r f 2 6 ' , 0 . 2 6 ' R M S S h o a l D r B e a c o n D r . 2 2 ( m i ) R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 3 0 1 o t h e r 4 9 4 9 D E R C 2 1 0 1 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 1 9 T o t a l 1 9 3 0 2 o t h e r T o t a l D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 1 0 8 D E R C 3 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 M e a s u r e A / P a l o V e r d e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R o c k y P o i n t D r 3 3 ( f t ) / 3 3 ( f t ) 4 3 0 1 o t h e r 2 8 T o t a l . 2 8 D E R C 2 1 0 2 5 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM fiscal years 2002-2006 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 32 06/12/2002 Name Supv.Dist Limits Length (mi) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Fund Source Fund Source Amount Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 41000 Description x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition (Comments) E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 01/02 1 02/03 1 03/04 04/05 1 05/06 Silver Fir Dr 3 300- 33 D 3 0 0 0 0 Cedar Glen Dr Wily E 1 0 0 0 0 .17 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 27 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 29 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western Total 33 Simpson Rd 3 300 224 D 30 0 0 0 0 Briggs Rd Rte 79 E 1 0 0 0 0 3.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconst AC Paved Rd other 900 C 193 0 0 0 0 Investigate groundwater problem near ponds. 300 Measure A/Western Total 1124 Soboba Rd 3 300 92 D 0 0 0 9 0 N'ly Bath Ave 0.1 mi Chabela Dr E 0 0 0 1 0 .56 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurf AC paved road other C 0 0 0 82 0 Coordinate with City of San Jacinto for south half of road. 300 Measure A/Western Total 92 South Broadway 4 302 85 D 0 0 8 0 0 15th Ave Blythe CL E 0 0 2 0 0 .40 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurface 0.1', 38' A/C W/ petromat other C 0 0 75 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde Total 85 Spalding Dr 4 301 50 D 0 0 0 0 0 Cambridge Ave Hopewell Ave E 0 0 0 0 0 .25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurface 0.21', 35' AC other C 50 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 50 Spar Cir 4 301 13 D 2 0 0 0 0 Galley Dr NWIy Galley Dr 0.07 mi E 1 0 0 0 0 .04 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Resurface Paved Road other C 10 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 13 St. Lucia Ct 4 301 11 D 0 0 0 0 `0 Port Royal Ave Nly Port Royal 0.03 mi E 0 0 0 0 0 .03 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) R 0 0 0 0 0 Reconstruct surface other C 11 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Total 11 • • 000468 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) P a g e 3 3 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l S t e t s o n A v e H e m e t S t S o b o b a S t . 2 7 ( m i ) 1 8 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e a l i g n a n d w i d e n A C p a v e d r o a d S t e t s o n A v e S o b o b a S t 1 . 5 0 ( m i ) W i d e n a n d R e c o n s t S u r f a c e 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 ) 0 2 / 0 3 0 3 / 0 4 J 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 5 6 8 2 1 2 7 8 0 D E R C 0 0 0 5 3 1 0 0 0 3 7 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F a i r v i e w A v e 2 2 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l S t e t s o n A v e D a r t m o u t h S t S t a n f o r d S t . 2 5 ( m i ) 4 2 ( f t ) / 5 6 ( f t ) W i d e n r o a d t o a d d l e f t t u r n l a n e F r o n t i n g H e m e t H i g h S c h o o l 3 5 5 5 1 5 5 7 0 D E R C 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 6 1 4 8 T o t a l S t o n e m a n S t G r a n d A v e S W ' l y 0 . 1 5 m i . 1 5 ( m i ) 2 8 ( f t ) / 2 8 ( f t ) P u l v e r i z e a n d R e s u r f R M S p a v e d r o a d 1 S t u d i o P L K e n n e d y S t L a k e v i e w A v e . 1 5 ( m i ) 2 0 ( f t ) / 2 0 ( f t ) R e m o v e p a v e m e n t , R e s u r f 0 . 2 1 ' ' A C 2 S u g a r t o R i d g e v i e w T e r r a c e . 0 4 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d S u n C i t y A r e a v a r i o u s r o a d s . 0 0 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d s 2 N ' t y 0 . 0 4 m i 3 0 ( f t ) / 3 0 ( f t ) 1 8 4 D 3 2 E 2 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 1 T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r 3 1 4 7 T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 7 3 7 T o t a l 3 7 0 0 0 0 D E R C 3 1 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 3 1 D 5 E 1 R 0 C 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( f t ) / ( f t ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 6 6 0 1 4 0 0 T o t a l 2 0 6 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 9 4 6 . 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 34 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Sun City Blvd 3 300 McCall Blvd Chambers Ave .50 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total Sun City Median Improvements 3 300 Segment 4 & 5 .00 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Place Stamped Concrete other 232 232 D E R C 01/02 02/03 103/04 ( 04/05 ( 05/06 0 0 0 0 O 0 22 0 O 0 1 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 300 Measure A/Western 100 Total Swingle Ave 4 301 Mites Ave N'ly Miles Ave 0.2 mi .20 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface Paved Road other Total Sycamore Rd 3 301 Atlantic Ave Nancy Dr .31 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurf RMS paved road other Total 100 D E R C 14 2 0 84 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 36 D 0 2 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 33 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 49 49 Sylvester Rd 1 300 Mission Tr Lakeview Terrace .21 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon AC paved road other 150 Total 150 D 0 2 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 46 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 0 0 0 0 25 0 1 0 O 0 124 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tamarack Rd 3 300 Wily Verbenia 0.57 mi Verbenia Ave .57 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 48 (ft) Resurf AC paved road other Total 264 Thousand Palms Canyon Rd 4 301 Ramon Rd/Washington St Dillon Rd 5.00 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen and Resurf RMS paved road other 264 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 25 0 238 770 Total 770 O 0 0 4 E 0 0 2 R 0 0 0 C . 0 0 764 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 • 000470 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) P a g e 3 5 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 T o b a g o C t P o r t R o y a l A v e . 0 3 ( m i ) R e c o n s t r u c t S u r f a c e 4 N l y P o r t R o y a l 0 . 0 3 m i 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) T o m a l L n 5 8 t h S t 5 6 t h S t . 2 4 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M 2 T r a n s f e r t o C i t y o f T e m e c u l a R e d h a w k A r e a . 0 0 ( m i ) ( f t ) / ( f t ) A n n e x a t i o n a g r e e m e n t f u n d t r a n s f e r T r e n t o n W a y F o r d h a m D r J a m e s t o w n D r . 0 5 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A H R M T r i n i t y C i r P o r t R o y a l A v e . 2 0 ( m i ) R e c o n A C s u r f a c e 1 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 J 0 2 / 0 3 1 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 1 2 1 2 4 5 4 5 1 8 7 1 8 7 D E " R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 E 0 0 R 0 0 C 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 9 D 0 0 E 0 0 R 0 0 C 8 7 1 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 1 3 1 3 N W ' l y e n d 3 5 ( f t ) / 3 5 ( f t ) T u m b l e w e e d S t 5 8 t h S t S o u t h e n d . 0 8 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A L A R M 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 4 6 4 6 U n i v e r s i t y D r A c a d e m y D r C o l l e g i a n W y . 0 4 ( m i ) 2 9 ( f t ) / 2 9 ( f t ) R e m o v e p a v e m e n t , R e s u r f 0 . 1 3 ' A C a n d 0 . 1 2 ' A H R M 2 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 2 1 2 1 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 O 5 O 1 O 0 O 1 5 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 0 T o t a l 1 0 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 36 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Total Valley Wy/ Armstrong Rd SR 60 Sierra Ave .90 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 76 (ft) Reconst and widen to 4 lanes RCTD is working to secure the local matching funds needed for R/W and construction. 2 300 other Total Van Buren Blvd Mockingbird Canyon Rd .10 (mi) 48 (ft)/ 60 (ft) Const right turn lane for SE -bound traffic 1 300 other Total Van Buren Blvd Washington St Orange Terrace Pkwy 3.50 (mi) 76 (ft)/ 76 (ft) Const raised median, C & G, and Bus turn -outs Future Coop w/City of Riverside & RTA Bus turn -outs primarily from Mockingbird Cyn Rd 1 Van Buren Btvd (Northside) West of Regency Ranch Wily 0.5 mi .50 (mi) (ft)/ (ft) Const concrete V ditch 1 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmentat C = Construction 01/02 ` 02/03 103/04 104/05 105/06 250 3147 3397 D E R C 205 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 120 D E R C 5 1 0 114 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 314 1326 1640 300 other Total 93 93 Varner Rd 1.9 mi S. Chase School 1.55 (mi) Resurface AC paved road Berkey Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) 4 301 other Total 90 461 551 Varner Rd Ramon Rd .70 (mi) Reconst AC paved road Ply Harry Oliver Tr 44 (ft)/ 44 (ft) 4 301 other 219 548 Total Vassar St Fulton Ave Wily 0.05 mi .05 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM 3 300 other 767 E R C 177 5 0 18 0 0 0 114 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 90 0 0 0 0 E 3 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 126 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 12 Total 12 D E R C 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • • 000472 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) P a g e 3 7 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 0 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t V e r b e n i a A v e R a i l r o a d A v e . 5 1 ( m i ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d C h a p a r r a l R d 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) 3 F u n d S o u r c e T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l V e r b e n i a A v e 3 C h a p a r r a l R d W i l y C h a p a r r a l 0 . 3 1 m i . 3 1 ( m i ) 6 0 ( f t ) / 6 0 ( f t ) R e s u r f A C p a v e d r o a d V i a C o s t a B r a v a V a n d e r v e e r R d . 5 7 ( m i ) R e s u r f a c e P a v e d R o a d 3 0 0 F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r r m e n t a l C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 0 2 / 0 3 1 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 1 0 5 / 0 6 2 9 5 2 9 5 D 0 f 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 O 2 8 0 1 O 0 O 2 6 6 o t h e r T o t a l 1 7 9 1 7 9 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n S e a v i e w W y 2 4 ( f t ) / 2 4 ( f t ) V i a J o s e f a V i a . S a n t i a g o F r o n t a g e R d . 0 5 ( m i ) 3 4 ( f t ) / 3 4 ( f t ) R e c o n A C p a v e d r o a d C o o r d i n a t e w i t h C i t y o f C o r o n a f o r a p o r t i o n o f t h e s t r e e t . O n l y c o u n t y c o s t s a r e s h o w n . V i n e l a n d S t E d g a r C a n y o n C h a n n e l . 0 1 ( m i ) C o n s t r u c t b o x c u l v e r t 4 2 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 3 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 1 0 1 6 1 D E R C 2 1 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o t h e r 2 6 T o t a l 2 6 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) V i o l a S t P l u m r o s e S t W h i t t i e r S t . 0 9 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) R e m o v e p a v e m e n t , R e s u r f 0 . 1 5 ' A C a n d 0 . 1 2 ' A H R M W a s h i n g t o n S t 1 0 0 0 P a l m s C y n R d 1 . 6 0 ( m i ) R e c o n s t A C p a v e d r o a d 3 3 0 0 o t h e r D 5 E 1 R 0 C 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 4 0 3 T o t a l 3 3 0 0 o t h e r 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 T o t a l 2 6 D E R C 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P u s h a w a l l a R d 2 6 ( f t ) / 2 6 ( f t ) 4 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 1 1 7 1 1 7 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 5 0 0 0 1 7 a RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 38 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (Comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Supv.Dist Fund Source Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Enviorrmental C = Construction Total 01/02 02/03 103/04 04/05 105/06 Wellman Rd 3 300 103 Terwilliger Rd Kirby St 1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen North side,0.5'DG; Resurf 26',0.21'RMS other Total 103 D E R C 0 0 0 0 O 0 2 0 O 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 300 Measure A/Western Wentworth Dr 3 300 83 Bradley Rd SE'ly 0.37 mi .37 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 83 D E R C 0 0 0 83 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Westover Way 3 300 22 New Bedford Rd S'ly New Bedford .11mi .11 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 22 D E R C 0 0 0 22 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windsor Dr 3 300 103 Cherry Hills Blvd McCall Blvd .39 (mi) 41 (ft)/ 41 (ft) Grind and Resurf with AHRM other Total 103 Winevitte Ave 2 300 300 Limonite Ave Bellegrave Ave 1.29 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Recon AC paved road other 334 Total 634 Winged Foot Dr 3 300 87 Cherry Hills Blvd McCall Blvd .38 (mi) 37 (ft)/ 37 (ft) Resurf with AHRM other Total 87 Worsley Rd 3 301 73 20th Ave Dillion Rd .70 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Reconstruct surface with RMS on existing base other Total 73 D E C 0 0 0 103 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 300 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 87 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 70 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 000474 " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M F i s c a l y e a r s 2 0 0 2 - 2 0 0 6 N a m e L i m i t s L e n g t h ( m i ) D e s c r i p t i o n ( C o m m e n t s ) P a g e 3 9 R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N D E P A R T M E N T 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 Q 2 E W ( f t ) / P W ( f t ) S u p v . D i s t Y o r b a L i n d a C t B r a d l e y R d E ' l y B r a d l e y 0 . 1 6 m i . 1 6 ( m i ) 3 2 ( f t ) / 3 2 ( f t ) G r i n d a n d R e s u r f w i t h A L A R M z * F u t u r e P r o j e c t s D i s t r i c t 1 O n l y . 0 0 ( m i ) 3 F u n d S o u r c e T o t a t 3 0 0 o t h e r F u n d S o u r c e A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 4 2 T o t a l 4 2 M e a s u r e A F u n d s b y F i s c a l Y e a r A m o u n t x $ 1 0 0 0 D = D e s i g n R = R i g h t o f W a y A c q u i s i t i o n E = E n v i o r n m e n t a t C = C o n s t r u c t i o n 0 1 / 0 2 1 0 2 / 0 3 1 0 3 / 0 4 0 4 / 0 5 0 5 / 0 6 D 0 0 E 0 0 R 0 0 C 4 2 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( f t ) / ( f t ) T h e s e f u n d s w i l l b e u s e d f o r p a v e m e n t r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n t h e y e a r s s h o w n . z * F u t u r e P r o j e c t s D i s t r i c t 3 O n l y . 0 0 ( m i ) 1 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l 1 7 2 0 2 2 4 2 3 9 6 2 ( f t ) / ( f t ) T h e s e f u n d s w i l t - b e u s e d f o r v a r i o u s p a v e m e n t r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n t h e y e a r s s h o w n . z * F u t u r e P r o j e c t s D i s t r i c t 4 O n l y . 0 0 ( m i ) 3 3 0 0 o t h e r T o t a l D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 1 7 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 0 3 5 7 0 3 6 9 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 ( f t ) / ( f t ) T h e s e f u n d s w i l l b e u s e d f o r p a v e m e n t r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n t h e y e a r s s h o w n . z * F u t u r e P r o j e c t s D i s t r i c t 5 O n l y . 0 0 ( m i ) 4 ( f t ) / ( f t ) T h e s e f u n d s w i l l b e u s e d f o r v a r i o u s p a v e m e n t r e h a b i l i t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n t h e y e a r s s h o w n . 5 3 0 1 o t h e r T o t a l 3 0 0 o t h e r 1 9 5 0 3 5 9 5 5 5 4 5 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 5 0 3 0 1 M e a s u r e A / C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y 3 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 5 7 T o t a l 3 2 5 7 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 M e a s u r e A / W e s t e r n 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 4 ' 7 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Fiscal years 2002-2006 Page 40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 06/12/2002 Fund Source Source Nme Fiscal Year (Amt x $1000) Fund Source Total Expenditure 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 (Amt x $1000), 300 Measure A/Western 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 302 Measure A/Palo Verde * Grand Totals * 19709 11193 5763 7362 7775 51802 1853 1817 1089 1908 2337 9004 321 120 220 250 225 1136 21883 13130 7072 9520 10337 61942 • 000476 " A G E N D A I T E M 7 W " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e I v a n M . C h a n d , C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t s B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a p p r o v e : 1 ) T h e i n c r e a s e f o r t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y H i g h w a y B u d g e t ; a n d , 2 ) T h e i n c r e a s e f o r t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n J u n e o f 2 0 0 0 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d a r e v i s i o n t o t h e C i t y o f P a l m S p r i n g s G e n e A u t r y T r a i l p r o j e c t t o b e i n c r e a s e d a n a d d i t i o n a l $ 2 7 4 , 9 4 7 . H o w e v e r , t h e C i t y e l e c t e d t o w a i t u n t i l t h e p r o j e c t w a s c o m p l e t e d t o s u b m i t t h e i r i n v o i c e a n d c o n s e q u e n t l y p a y m e n t s r a n o v e r i n t o F Y 0 1 - 0 2 . T h e C o m m i s s i o n a l s o a p p r o v e d a n o v e r r u n a m o u n t o f $ 2 8 , 1 0 9 . I n a d d i t i o n , t h e r e w e r e s e v e r a l i n v o i c e s r e c e i v e d f o r t h e M o n t e r e y p r o j e c t i n F Y 0 1 - 0 2 t h a t w e r e e x p e c t e d t o b e p a i d i n t h e p r i o r y e a r . T h e s e i n v o i c e s r e s u l t e d i n t h e C o m m i s s i o n g o i n g o v e r t h e b u d g e t f o r F Y 0 1 - 0 2 . S t a f f w o u l d l i k e t o i n c r e a s e t h e a p p r o p r i a t i o n s t o c o v e r t h e s e c o s t s . C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y S p e c i a l i z e d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n o p e r a t i n g b u d g e t n e e d s t o b e i n c r e a s e d t o a c c o m m o d a t e p l a n s a p p r o v e d a s p a r t o f t h e S h o r t R a n g e T r a n s i t P l a n . T h i s i n c r e a s e i s f o r $ 2 8 5 , 0 0 0 . S u f f i c i e n t f u n d b a l a n c e s e x i s t t o c o v e r t h e s e e x p e n d i t u r e s . F i n a n c i a l I n f o r m a t i o n I n F i s c a l Y e a r B u d g e t : N Y e a r : F Y 0 1 - 0 2 A m o u n t : $ 6 3 5 , 0 0 0 S o u r c e o f F u n d s : C o a c h e l l a M e a s u r e " A " f u n d s B u d g e t A d j u s t m e n t : Y G L A N o . : 2 2 4 - 3 1 - 8 1 3 0 1 2 2 4 - 2 6 - 8 6 1 0 1 F i s c a l P r o c e d u r e s A p p r o v e d : $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 8 5 , 0 0 0 D a t e : 0 6 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 2 I t e m 7 W 0 0 0 4 7 7 AGENDA ITEM 7X " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : P l a n s a n d P r o g r a m s C o m m i t t e e C l a u d i a C h a s e , P r o p e r t y A g e n t T H R O U G H : H i d e o S u g i t a , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 3 - 2 5 - 0 0 4 w i t h J e f f e r s o n T r a n s i t i o n a l P r o g r a m s f o r C l e a n i n g a n d M a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e f o u r M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n s i n R i v e r s i d e a n d A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 3 - 2 5 - 9 0 2 w i t h D L S L a n d s c a p e / I r r i g a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t f o r C l e a n i n g a n d M a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e F u t u r e N o r t h M a i n C o r o n a S t a t i o n P L A N S A N D P R O G R A M S C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) A w a r d A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 3 - 2 5 - 0 0 4 , t h r e e - y e a r c o n t r a c t w i t h t w o o n e - y e a r o p t i o n s , t o J e f f e r s o n T r a n s i t i o n a l P r o g r a m s t o p r o v i d e t h e c l e a n i n g a n d m a i n t e n a n c e f o r t h e f o u r c u r r e n t M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ; R i v e r s i d e D o w n t o w n , L a S i e r r a , W e s t C o r o n a , a n d P e d l e y S t a t i o n s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 7 0 , 3 7 0 . 6 4 ; 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r m a n , p u r s u a n t t o L e g a l C o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ; 3 ) A p p r o v e A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 3 - 2 5 - 9 0 2 w i t h D L S L a n d s c a p e / I r r i g a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t t o p r o v i d e t h e c l e a n i n g a n d m a i n t e n a n c e f o r t h e f u t u r e N o r t h M a i n C o r o n a ; 4 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r m a n , p u r s u a n t t o L e g a l C o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e a o n e - y e a r a g r e e m e n t w i t h t w o t w o - y e a r o p t i o n s , w i t h D L S L a n d s c a p e / I r r i g a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t o n c e t h e N o r t h M a i n C o r o n a S t a t i o n h a s b e e n c o n s t r u c t e d ; a n d , 5 ) A u t h o r i z e s t a f f t o s e e k p r o p o s a l s f o r q u a r t e r l y s t r e e t s w e e p i n g o f t h e f o u r e x i s t i n g s t a t i o n s a n d i n c l u d e t h e N o r t h M a i n S t a t i o n o n c e c o n s t r u c t e d . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : I n F e b r u a r y 2 0 0 2 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i z e d t h e r e l e a s e o f a S t a t i o n C l e a n i n g a n d G r o u n d s M a i n t e n a n c e S e r v i c e s R e q u e s t f o r P r o p o s a l t o p r o v i d e c l e a n i n g s e r v i c e s a t t h e f o u r M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . B i d s w e r e d u e J u n e 1 7 , 2 0 0 2 , a n d I t e m 7 X 0 9 0 4 7 , four proposals were received. An evaluation committee comprised of one RCTC Commissioner, a representative from SCRRA and two RCTC staff reviewed the proposals for experience, knowledge of the work to be performed, qualifications and responsiveness. The firms, their ranking, cost and hours proposed were as follows: Firm Jefferson Transitional Programs DLS Landscape/Irrigation Management Wurm's Janitorial Executive Services Ranking 1 2 3 4 Cost per year $70,370.64 $70,800.00 $35,400.00 $65,016.00 Hours per year 1,560 832 1,196 1,420 The Evaluation Committee met and interviewed the four applicants on June 21, 2002. The Committee discussed the proposals and finalized their scoring of the proposals based on the following criteria included in the RFP: Understanding of the work to be done, Supervisor empowerment, Comparable Experience, Response to emergency situations and Cost. Based on the above criteria the Evaluation Committee recommends the Commission award the contract to Jefferson Transitional for the ongoing responsibility of cleaning and maintaining the current four Metrolink Stations. Based on the above criteria the Evaluation Committee and Plans & Programs recommend to select DLS for the cleaning and maintenance of the future North Main Corona Station once construction is complete. At that time staff will negotiate an agreement, pursuant to Legal Review. In addition, the Evaluation Committee and Plans & Programs recommends staff seek proposals for a quarterly professional parking lot sweeping. • • • ,„ Item .7X 060 `9 AGENDA ITEM 7Y • " " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : C l a u d i a C h a s e , P r o p e r t y A g e n t T H R O U G H : H i d e o S u g i t a , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : S u r p l u s P r o p e r t y S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) D e c l a r e t h e p r o p e r t y i d e n t i f i e d o n t h e a t t a c h e d p a r c e l m a p s u r p l u s ; a n d 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r t o i n i t i a t e t h e s i x t y ( 6 0 ) d a y p u b l i c a g e n c y n o t i f i c a t i o n p e r i o d a n d i f n o i n t e r e s t i s e x p r e s s e d , o f f e r t h e p a r c e l s f o r s a l e . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : W i t h R C T C ' s a c q u i s i t i o n o f t h e S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h l i n e t h e C o m m i s s i o n a l s o r e c e i v e d a d d i t i o n a l p a r c e l s a l o n g t h e r i g h t - o f - w a y . C e r t a i n p a r c e l s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d t o b e o f n o f u t u r e u s e f o r R C T C . I n J u l y o f 1 9 9 5 p o l i c i e s w e r e s e t f o r t h e d i s p o s i t i o n o f s u r p l u s p r o p e r t y o w n e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . T h e p r o c e d u r e s b e f o r e s e l l i n g a p r o p e r t y r e q u i r e t h e P r o p e r t y C o m m i t t e e t o ; 1 ) D e c l a r e t h e p a r c e l s u r p l u s ; 2 ) D i r e c t s t a f f t o n o t i c e s e l e c t e d P u b l i c E n t i t i e s o f t h e i n t e n t t o s e l l ; 3 ) P r o v i d i n g t h e r e i s n o t a n i n t e r e s t f r o m t h e p u b l i c e n t i t i e s w i t h i n 6 0 d a y s , R C T C m a y p r o c e e d t o o f f e r t h e s i t e t o t h e g e n e r a l p u b l i c f o r p u r c h a s e ; 4 ) P a r t i e s i n t e r e s t e d i n p u r c h a s i n g C o m m i s s i o n o w n e d p r o p e r t i e s s h a l l s u b m i t t h e i r f o r m a l w r i t t e n o f f e r t o R C T C ; a n d , 5 ) O n c e t h e o f f e r i s r e v i e w e d b y t h e P r o p e r t y C o m m i t t e e t h e p r o p o s a l w i l l b e f o r w a r d e d t o t h e R C T C B o a r d f o r f i n a l a p p r o v a l . S t a f f h a s i d e n t i f i e d a p r o p e r t y i n S a n J a c i n t o a l o n g t h e B r a n c h L i n e w h i c h h a s a n a r r o w s t r i p o f a b a n d o n e d t r a c k r i g h t - o f - w a y . T h i s p r o p e r t y a f f e c t s c e r t a i n a d j a c e n t p r o p e r t y o w n e r s w h i l e a l s o r e q u i r i n g a b a t e m e n t . R C T C h a s n o f u t u r e u s e f o r t h i s l a n d a n d s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e C o m m i t t e e c o n s i d e r o f f e r i n g i t f o r m a r k e t i n g . I t e m 7 Y 0 0 0 4 8 0 " 7 f f . : I E l l i ! } c f i 1 L I ��I * W ' : I . I A S t F t 7 R t ��I J u I s : 7 " 1 1 1 1 / , ; W Y . L M I I C : I I T : I S : " : A S f M t F W > " 1 , 5 - V I l W A t t 3 I T Y t ' W t l ; ' : S W t 3 W : : �� " " ' A ' S S L f i l 1 ' f t J 3 C F I : 1 : I M . W t 7 t Y 3 1 W T = 3 1 / i l : ; ; ' . { Y t L ' t f l l f . M W i W ' c . _ . ! 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . t s / r : t t f " I W A Y t s t . . . t _ I ' : A 3 2 f 9 r 7 ' 5 - Y i r : ��i �%: a e : a a : i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C . I . f 1 : . G F . : S A N U C 1 N " Y O . ; : : ; M E t E F . o L A R A t : o f i A N C f t o I 4 1 7 A C l l t t O ' _ V P . v i T U 6 : 1 ; ( t " C . : : : k i N k : ; t : ; : A a . F i ! ' : ; t 0 : : _ 4 G B . ; ; Y t i . ! ' { x : 1 : 1 : ' 3 1 k ; F k : E 4 7 0 . A 7 f : : i - 0 4 0 : 0 A G > . y l : P . 6 . 9 ` : : : ; 1 3 - i 6 t C . V I C E M O : ' O f �� U S T E f ; : : : : j ; : : F E . t f - k T i : : : 6 A $ G C i : Y A : l : : : Y 3 9 i : i . " : , . : : ; " . A . e E t . . . 4 A , f . : 2 l . _ S S . ; : . : : . ; x V o t i . V . : 0 : : . ; : R X " 1 : y _ 4 < I l G . ��l . Y P ��f R C C Y : N A ; t ; ; : 2 1 1 . 1 ; . h _ : " . : : : : f : i . : : ; . ; ; R E Y : a i w ; : f s i 4 n 4 1 I t e m 7 Y 0 0 0 . 4 8 1 " " " .. fk7Atis(tailoi. Q?:SD: :$4N 40VJRt lM: `: :: : .041:.. 04kK- Q : . . lERR4LE. :Acel:Jl Item 7Y 00043 " A G E N D A I T E M 8 " AGENDA ITEM 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Karl Sauer, Bechtel Construction Manager Dennis Mejia, Bechtel Resident Engineer THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 02-33-066 — Contract for the Construction of the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 02-33-066, for the construction of the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project to L. D. Anderson, Inc. for the amount of $318,594, plus a contingency amount of $49,056 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total contract authorization of $367,650; and 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the standard construction agreement, pursuant to Legal Counsel Review, on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the May 9, 2001 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee to address policy issues identified in the draft Station Management Plan, submitted to the Commission at the same meeting. One of the main findings of the draft Station Management Plan was that by 2010, five out of the six, existing and proposed, Metrolink stations are forecasted to have parking deficits. At the September 10, 2001 RCTC meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Consultant to provide Engineering and Environmental Services to develop and implement a Parking Lot Expansion Plan, mainly for the existing Riverside -La Sierra and Riverside -Downtown Metrolink stations. On November 14, 2001, the Commission entered into Agreement #02-33-029 with Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. (ERSC), to provide Engineering and Environmental Services for development and implementation of a Parking Lot Expansion Plan for the existing two stations. Engineering Resources developed a plan to use RCTC's existing triangular property, directly north and adjacent to the Riverside - Downtown Station temporary parking area, across Vine Street. This plan would add approximately 125 additional parking spaces for the station. It must be noted that this RCTC property is anticipated to be needed for the future expansion of Route 91. It is currently projected that the expansion of Route 91 will not occur, in this area, for more than 5 years. At the May 8, 2002 RCTC meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise bids for construction of the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project. The project was advertised starting on June 10, 2002 with the bid opening on July 8, 2002. Four (4) bids were received and opened on July 8, 2002 at 2:00 pm. A summary of the bids received are shown in Table A: TABLE A Construction of the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project Bid Summary Firm (in order from Low bid to High bid) Bid Amount Amount Over Low Bid Engineers Estimate $367,650 1 L. D. Anderson, Inc. 2750 S. Lilac Avenue Bloomington, CA 92316-3214 $318,594 ($49,056) 2 Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. 1467 Circle City Drive Corona, CA 92879-1668 $325,745 ($41,905) 3 Cunningham -Davis Corp. P.O. Box 729 Calimesa, CA 92320 $339,639 ($28,011) 4 International Pavement Solutions 1199 Opal Avenue Mentone, CA 92359 $384,717 $17,067 The bids were reviewed by Legal Counsel and Staff, and all concurred that L. D. Anderson, Inc. low bid was the lowest responsive bid received for the project. A summary of the review of the three (3) lowest bids received and the responsiveness of the bids are detailed in Table B: TABLE B Checklist Item LD Anderson Hillcrest Contractin g Cunningham -Davis 1 Bid Letter Yes Yes Yes 2 Schedule of Prices - Bid Amount (math check) - Bid Item Comparison - w/Eng's Est - w/other Bidders - Unbalanced Bid Items Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 3 Bid Bond Yes Yes Yes 4 List of Subcontractors - Prime Performs >50% Work Yes Yes Yes 5 Bidder Information Forms - Reference Check Yes Yes 1 Yes Yes 1 Yes Yes1 6 Non -Collusion Affidavit Yes Yes Yes 7 Evidence of Insurance Yes Yes Yes Note: 1 Staff is currently researching references listed on bidder forms. Staff has verified that Bidder's license is current and active. Table C summarizes the costs associated with the Construction of the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project for the three (3) lowest bids received: TABLEC (itemized breakdown of the lowest three (3) bids received in comparison to the engineer's estimate) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION Engineers Estimate (Base) L.D. Anderson, Inc. Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Cunningham - Davis Corp. 1 Mobilization $16,000 $3,800 $16,000 $12,000 2 Clean -Up $8,000 $2,700 $4,500 $2,600 3 Construction Water $3,000 $2,900 $700 $2,000 4 Demolition and Removals $5,000 $1,400 $5,500 $6,500 5 Site Clearing and Grubbing $5,000 $1,000 $1,800 $3,849 6 Safety and Shoring $6,000 $500 $300 $1,500 7 Excavation $5,460 $7,800 $14,820 $16,832 8 Remove and Recompact $9,200 $6,900 $18,860 $50,094 9 Erosion Control $5,000 $2,000 $2,500 $1,000 10 Crushed Aggregate Base $14,150 $28,300 $21,225 $29,574 11 Asphalt Concrete Pavement $33,075 $33,075 $33,075 $33,075 12 PCC Curb $9,933 $9,030 $9,933 $9,165 13 PCC Curb and Gutter $11,622 $10,728 $10,728 $10,817 14 PCC Sidewalk $1,210 $1,936 $2,904 $2,178 15 PCC Wheel Stops $1,000 $625 $650 $2,030 16 Pavement Striping, Marking & Signage $5,000 $7,000 $1,400 $5,000 17 Irrigation Sprinkler System $32,000 $40,000 $35,000 $17,706 18 Landscaping $58,000 $38,000 $38,000 $38,816 19 Landscape, 90 Day Maintenance Period $3,500 $2,400 $2,700 $7,480 20 Masonry Walls $8,000 $11,000 $10,500 $15,720 21 Basic Electrical Requirements $40,000 $30,000 $44,400 $9,419 22 Lighting Fixtures $87,500 $77,500 $50,250 $62,283 GRAND TOTAL $367,650 $318,594 $325,745 $339,639 From staff's and legal counsel's review of the bids received, staff is recommending that the Commission award Agreement No. 02-33-066 — For The Construction of the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station Parking Lot Expansion Project - to L. D. Anderson, Inc. for the amount of $318,594 plus a contingency amount of $49,056 to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed amount of $367,650. The standard RCTC construction contract will be used, pursuant to legal counsel review. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 02/03 Amount: $367,650 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Funds (LTF) Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 221 33 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 7-10-02 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : B u d g e t a n d I m p l e m e n t a t i o n C o m m i t t e e B i l l H u g h e s , B e c h t e l P r o j e c t M a n a g e r D e n n i s M e j i a , B e c h t e l R e s i d e n t E n g i n e e r T H R O U G H : H i d e o S u g i t a , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 2 - 3 3 - 0 6 6 f o r t h e C o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t B U D G E T A N D I M P L E M E N T A T I O N C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o : 1 ) D i r e c t s t a f f t o p r e s e n t i t s a w a r d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r A g r e e m e n t N o . 0 2 - 3 3 - 0 6 6 f o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t ; a n d 2 ) A u t h o r i z e t h e C h a i r m a n , p u r s u a n t t o L e g a l C o u n s e l r e v i e w , t o e x e c u t e t h e a g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : A t i t s M a y 8 , 2 0 0 2 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i z e d s t a f f t o a d v e r t i s e b i d s f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n P a r k i n g L o t E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t . T h e p r o j e c t w i l l a d d 1 2 5 p a r k i n g s p a c e s a t t h i s l o c a t i o n o n l a n d t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a l r e a d y o w n s . T h e p r o j e c t w a s a d v e r t i s e d s t a r t i n g o n J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 w i t h t h e b i d o p e n i n g s c h e d u l e d f o r J u l y 8 , 2 0 0 2 . T h e b i d o p e n i n g d a t e w i l l n o t p r o v i d e a n o p p o r t u n i t y t o b r i n g t h e b i d r e s u l t s b a c k t o t h e C o m m i t t e e u n l e s s t h e p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y i s d e l a y e d a b o u t 2 m o n t h s d u e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n n o t h a v i n g a n A u g u s t m e e t i n g . T h e p r o j e c t i s u r g e n t l y n e e d e d t o s u p p o r t t h e e x p a n s i o n o f M e t r o l i n k s e r v i c e o n t h e B N & S F l i n e . S t a f f i s r e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t t h e a w a r d b e t a k e n d i r e c t l y t o t h e J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 C o m m i s s i o n m e e t i n g f o r a c t i o n . I t e m 8 0 0 0 4 8 4 AGENDA ITEM 9 AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: . ._.._...__ July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Erik Galloway, Bechtel Resident Engineer THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Award Agreement No. 02-31-056, for the Realignment and Widening of State Route 74, from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km East of Wasson Canyon Road STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 02-31-056, for the realignment and widening of State Route 74, from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km east of Wasson Canyon Road, to Riverside Construction Company Inc., for the amount of $10,561,454.15 plus an approximate 5% contingency amount of $538,545.85, to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total contract amount not to exceed $11,100,000; and 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the standard construction agreement, pursuant to Legal Counsel Review, on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Measure "A" Strategic Plan includes improvements to State Route 74, between 1-15 in the City of Lake Elsinore and 7th Street in the City of Perris, a length of approximately 8.5 miles. The proposed improvements include the realignment and widening of the existing two (2) lane roadway to four (4) lanes with 8 foot shoulders and a continuous 14 foot paved median. The project is being designed in two segments. Segment 1 is from 1-15 to Wasson Canyon Road. Segment 11 is from Wasson Canyon Road to 7th Street in the City of Perris. At the September 10, 2001 RCTC meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise Segment 1 of the project for receipt of construction bids. The project was advertised starting on May 20, 2002 with the Bid Opening on July 2, 2002. Five (5) bids were received and opened on July 2, 2002, at 2:00 p.m. A summary of the bids received are shown in Table A: TABLE A Realignment And Widening Of The Existing State Route 74 From Dexter Avenue To 0.5 Km East Of Wasson Canyon Road Bid Summary Firm (in order from Low bid to High bid) Bid Amount Amount Over Low Bid Engineers Estimate $11,103,321.90 1 Riverside Construction Company Inc. 111 N., Main Street Riverside, Ca. 92501 $10,561,454.15 -$541,867.75 2 Vance Corporation 2271 N. Locust Ave. Rialto, Ca. 92377 $11,080,087.68 $518,633.53 3 Griffith Company Inc. 2020 S. Yale Street Santa Ana, Ca. 92704 $11,448,277.90 $886,823.75 4 E.L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc. 1995 Agua Mansa Road Riverside, Ca. 92509 $11,516,296.20 $954,842.05 5 Ladd And Associates 1304 East St. Suite 212 Redding, Ca. 96099-2750 $11,966,965.00 $1,405,510.85 The bids were reviewed by Legal Counsel and staff, and all concurred that Riverside Construction Company Inc. low bid was the lowest responsive bid received for the project. A summary of the review of the three (3) lowest bids received and the responsiveness of the bids are detailed in Table B: TABLE B Checklist Item Riverside Construction Vance Corporation Griffith Company Inc. 1 Bid Letter Yes Yes Yes 2 Schedule of Prices - Bid Amount (math check) - Bid Item Comparison - w/Eng's Est - w/other Bidders - Unbalanced Bid Items Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No 3 Bid Bond i Yes Yes Yes 4 List of Subcontractors - Prime Performs >50% Work Yes Unknown 1 Unknown 1 5 Bidder Information Forms - Reference Check Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 Non -Collusion Affidavit Yes Yes Yes 7 Evidence of Insurance 2 No 2 No 2 No Note: 1 Bidder did not provide subcontract values. 2 Bidder did not submit evidence of insurance but staff is currently working with the bidder to obtain and verify that they either currently has or can obtain the insurance required prior to award of a construction contract with the Commission for the project. Table C (see attached) summarizes the costs associated with the realignment and widening of State Route 74 from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km east of Wasson Canyon Road for the three (3) lowest bids received. From staffs and legal counsel's review of the bids received, staff is recommending that the Commission award Agreement No. 02-31-056, for the realignment and widening of State Route 74 from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km east of Wasson Canyon Road, to Riverside Construction Company Inc., for the amount of $10,561,454.15 plus an approximate 5% contingency amount of $538,545.85, to cover potential change orders encountered during construction, for a total not to exceed amount of $11,100,000. The standard RCTC construction contract will be used, contingent upon legal counsel review. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Y Year: FY 2002-03 Amount: $11,100,000 Source of Funds: Bond Proceeds Budget Adjustment: N GLA No.: 222-31-81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 07/08/2002 Attachment: Table "C" TABLE C Item No Item Code Item Description Unit of Meas. Estimated Quantity Engineer's Estiamte Riverside Construction Total Vance Corporation Total Griffith Company Total 1 070010 PROGRESS SCHEDULE (CRITICAL PATH) LS 1 $20,000 $15,000 $86,000 $8,000 2 070014A PREPARE LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN LS 1 $1,000 $1,000 $3,000 $500 3 071301 TEMPORARY FENCE m 3851 $38,510 $84,722 $23,106 $84,722 4 073000 TEMPORARY CULVERT m 63 $4,410 $5,355 $9,765 $14,805 5 074019 PREPARE STOR M WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN LS 1 $2,000 $2,500 $3,900 $5,000 6 074020 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL LS 1 $100,000 $75,000 $77,000 $75,000 7 120090 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS LS 1 $20,000 $15,000 $13,000 $15,000 8 120100 TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS 1 $200,000 $200,000 $314,000 $25,000 9 120300 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKERS EA 2676 $2,676 $6,690 $8,028 $7,627 10 120150 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS m2 12 $840 $300 $324 $312 11 120161 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC STRIPE (P AINT) m 27756 $27,756 $18,041 $13,878 $14,711 12 120165 CHANNELIZERS (SURF ACE MOUNTED) EA 323 $969 $8,075 $8,398 $8,721 13 128650 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN EA 2 $24,000 $50,000 $34,000 $30,000 14 129000A TEM PORARY WATER MAIN CONNECTION EA 4 $12,000 $12,000 $12,800 $10,000 15 129100 TEMPORARY CRASH CUSHION MODULE EA 286 $64,350 $57,200 $50,336 $50,050 16 129500 TEMPORARY RAILING (TYPE K) m 3853 $115,590 $77,060 $111,737 $131,002 17 129500A TEMPORA RY RAILING (TYPE K) PERMANENT INSTALLATION m 48 $2,400 $3,840 $3,696 $4,800 18 150229 ABA NDON WATER WELL EA 3 $9,000 $7,500 $2,412 $9,300 19 150605 REMOVE FENCE m 503 $2,515 $3,270 $5,533 $7,545 20 150620 REMOVE STEEL GATE EA 1 $250 $300 $1,000 $600 21 150742 REMOVE ROADSIDE SIGN EA 30 $2,700 $3,000 $1,620 $3,150 22 150804 REMOVE DRAINAGE FACILITY EA 13 $13,000 $13,000 $7,930 $48,100 23 150835A REMOVE BLOCK WALL m2 364 $36,400 $5,460 $8,008 $6,552 24 150860 REMOVE BASE AND SURFACING m3 2651 $26,510 $47,718 $29,161 $34,463 25 151531 RECONSTRUCT FENCE m 34 $680 $3,060 $1,451 $1,428 26 153152 COLD PLANE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (90 mm MAX) m2 1995 $3,990 $5,985 $5,985 $5,985 27 152255A RELOCATE MAILBOX EA 46 $11,500 $9,200 $4,692 $11,500 28 152386 RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN -ONE POST EA 26 $5,200 $3,900 $2,782 $3,380 29 152387 RELOCATE ROADSIDE SIGN -TWO POST EA 8 $2,080 $2,000 $2,560 $1,440 30 153215 REMOVE CONCRETE (CURB, GUTTER, & SPRANDEL, SIDEWALK & MISC. PVM T) m3 2007 $140,483 $90,311 $84,290 $54,186 31 160120 REMOVE TREE EA 45 $11,250 $15,750 $46,800 $33,750 32 160101 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LS 1 $80,000 $80,000 $28,700 $80,000 33 170101 DEVELOP WATER SUPPLY LS 1 $100,000 $100,000 $95,500 $100,000 34 190101 ROADWA Y EXCAVATION m3 129600 $1,036,800 $1,296,000 $1,010,880 $1,684,800 35 194001 DITCH EXCA VATION m3 1172 $25,784 $23,440 $15,529 $41,020 36 202007 DUFF m2 93000 $46,500 $69,750 $102,300 $65,100 37 203016 EROSION CONTROL (TYPE D) ha 8 $15,000 $52,500 $48,000 $45,000 38 203016A EROSION CO NTROL (TYPE BFM ) m2 18000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,900 $18,000 39 203026 MOVE IN/MOVE OUT (EROSION CONTROL) EA 6 $12,000 $3,000 $3,204 $3,150 40 220101 FINISHING ROADWAY LS 1 $10,000 $50,000 $31,000 $15,000 41 208304A WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS EA 37 $29,600 $37,000 $49,395 $66,600 42 208305A WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL A) EA 1 $5,000 $7,500 $8,500 $3,500 43 208305B WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL B) EA 1 $4,000 $5,000 $4,800 $3,500 44 208305C WA TER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL C) EA 1 $6,000 $5,000 $4,800 $6,000 45 208305D WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL D) EA 1 $1,000 $8,500 $8,800 $3,300 46 208305E WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL E) EA 1 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 $5,200 47 208305F WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL F) EA 1 $6,000 $4,500 $4,800 $3,500 48 208305G WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL G) EA 1 $6,000 $4,500 $4,800 $4,300 49 208305H WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL H) EA 1 $5,000 $4,500 $4,800 $8,300 50 2083051 WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL I) EA 1 $5,000 $3,500 $4,000 $5,000 51 208305J WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETA IL J) EA 1 $5,000 $5,000 $4,800 $5,200 52 208305K WATER MAIN CONNECTION (PER DETAIL K) EA 1 $5,000 $6,500 $7,500 $8,500 53 208633A BLOWOFF EA 1 $2,500 $2,500 $2,700 $5,300 54 208683A 50 mm (1" ) AIR VALVE EA 2 $6,000 $2,500 $2,600 $9,000 Page C-1 I A KLt t: Item No Item Code Item Description Unit of Meas. Estimated Q uantity Engineer's Estlamte Riverside Construction T otal Vance Corporation Total Griffith Company Total 55 208590A 150 mm (6") GATE VALVE AND VALVE WELL PER EVMWD STD . DWG . NO. W-13 EA 2 $1,000 $2,000 $1,920 $1,900 56 250500A GRAVEL (COARSE AGGREG ATE) m3 17 $255 $2,550 $816 $1,700 57 260201 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE m3 52265 $1,567,950 $1,306,625 $1,385,023 $1,202,095 58 390106 ASPHALT CONCRETE (OPEN GRADED) TONNE 4399 $197,955 $206,753 $193,556 $193,556 59 390120 ASPHALT CONCRETE (TYPE A) TONNE 50102 $2,254,590 $2,004,080 $2,104,284 $2,154,386 60 394040 PLACE AC DIKE (TYPE A) & (TYPE A - MODIFIED) m 2743 $13,715 $8,229 $8,778 $7,543 61 394048 PLACE AC DIKE (TYPE E) m 712 $4,272 $2,136 $2,278 $1,958 62 394002 PLACE AC (MISC . AREA) m2 1104 $22,080 $27,600 $26,496 $17,664 63 395001 LIQUID ASPHALT (PRI ME COAT) TONNE 112 $33,600 $61,600 $36,960 $39,200 64 420201 GRIND EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT m2 756 $7,560 $5,292 $12,096 $19,656 65 401066A CONCRETE PAVEMENT (BUS TURN OUTS) m3 432 $43,200 $82,080 $185,760 $123,120 66 510104 CLASS 1 CONCRETE (B OX CULVERT, WINGWALLS & TRANSITION STRUCTURE) m3 674 $269,600 $276,340 $276,340 $390,920 67 510515 MINOR CONCRETE (FOOTING) (F) m3 49 $29,400 $13,475 $17,885 $32,095 68 510502 MINOR CONCRETE (MINOR STRUCTURE & HEADWALLS) (F) m3 105 $105,000 $105,000 $118,125 $126,000 69 510502A M INOR CONCRETE (WATER PUMPING FACILITIES SLAB) m3 13 $6,500 $10,400 $8,450 $22,100 70 518201 MASONRY BLOCK WALL m2 184 $23,920 $26,680 $31,280 $29,440 71 518002 SOUND WALL (MASONRY BLOCK) m2 248 $29,760 $37,200 $44,640 $42,160 72 520101 BA R REINFORCING STEEL Kg 96339 $96,339 $96,339 $115,607 $107,900 73 530100 SHOTCRETE m3 570 $199,500 $185,250 $166,440 $245,100 74 566011 ROADSIDE SIGN - ONE POST EA 45 $7,875 $11,250 $9,000 $12,600 75 566012 ROADSIDE SIGN -TWO POST EA 17 $7,650 $9,350 $11,900 $9,860 76 620913 600 mm ALTERNATIVE PIPE m 528 $63,360 $105,600 $152,064 $111,936 77 620919 750 mm ALTERNATIVE PIPE m 152 $22,800 $38,000 $47,880 $39,520 78 620924 900 mm ALTERNATIVE PIPE m 44 $7,040 $13,200 $16,192 $17,160 79 620930 1050 mm ALTERNATIVE PIPE m 340 $57,800 $119,000 $149,600 $112,200 80 650365 450 mm REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 111) m 12 $1,800 $3,600 $2,460 $4,260 81 650370 600 mm REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS 111) m 395 $79,000 $98,750 $130,350 $84,925 82 650470 450 mm REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS IV) m 16 $2,800 $7,200 $4,256 $5,360 83 650476 600 mm REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS IV) m 154 $36,960 $38,500 $51,744 $33,110 84 650480 750 mm REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CLASS IV) m 860 $240,800 $172,000 $253,700 $223,600 85 680930A 150 mm PREFORATED PLASTIC PIPE m 5 $500 $750 $665 $600 86 692090 450 mm ENTRANCE TAPER EA 1 $350 $750 $800 $625 87 692385 450 mm ANCHOR ASSEMBLY EA 2 $400 $1,000 $1,000 $500 88 690166 450 mm CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE DOWNDRAIN (2. 01 mm THICK) m 16 $2,640 $2,800 $4,800 $4,000 89 703546A 400 mm (16") STEEL CASING m 82 $14,350 $14,350 $13,120 $13,120 90 703564A 510 mm (20" ) STEEL CASING m 357 $71,400 $83,895 $89,250 $87,465 91 703595A 760 mm (30") STEEL CASING m 41 $9,225 $22,550 $23,780 $22,755 92 705044 450 mm STEEL FLARED END SECTION EA 1 $100 $750 $370 $650 93 705925A 200 mm (8") GATE VALVE AND VALVE WELL PER EVMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-13 EA 10 $7,000 $8,500 $10,000 $9,000 94 705935A 300 mm (12") GATE VALVE AND VALVE WELL PER EVMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-13 EA 28 $30,800 $42,000 $42,000 $42,000 95 705222 450 mm CONRETE FLARED END SECTION EA 4 $3,200 $2,600 $2,560 $3,100 96 705224 600 mm CONRETE FLARED END SECTION EA 10 $10,000 $7,500 $7,700 $9,250 97 705226 750 mm CONRETE FLARED END SECTION EA 1 $1,200 $1,500 $1,600 $1,175 98 705650A SLIDING GATE EA 1 $1,400 $1,500 $800 $4,500 99 707471 900 mm CONCRETE PIPE INLET m 2 $1,200 $2,000 $4,200 $260 100 708058 900 mm ALTERNATIVE PIPE INLET m 12 $7,500 $6,000 $6,000 $5,820 101 708062 300 mm ALTERNATIVE PIPE RISER m 1 $420 $180 $600 $1,158 102 714034A 200 mm (8") SEWER PIPE m 84 $12,600 $22,680 $25,200 $25,200 103 717000A INSTALL LEACH LINES (LOCATION 1) LS 1 $4,600 $5,000 $5,300 $5,500 104 717000B INSTALL LEACH LINES AND SEPTIC TANK (LOCATION 2) LS 1 $5,850 $11,500 $13,000 $13,000 105 7170008 INSTALL LEACH LINES AND SEPTIC TANK (LOCATION 3) LS 1 $5,850 $11,500 $6,000 $6,000 Page C-2 I AIiLC t: Item No Item Code Item Description Unit of Meas. Estimated Quantity Engineer's Estiamt e Riverside C onstruction Total Vance Corporati on Total Griffith C ompany Total 106 717000D INSTALL LEACH LINES (LOCATION 4) LS 1 $4,200 $5,000 $13,000 $13,000 107 718004 A 200 mm (8") DUCTILE IRON PIPE m 447 $73,755 $53,640 $54,534 $53,640 108 718006A 300 mm (12 ") DUCTILE IRON PIPE m 5805 $1,092,975 $952,850 . $1,020,110 $924,825 109 718008A 400 mm (16") DUCTILE IRON PIPE m 42 $8,190 $14,700 $15,204 $15,120 110 719567 CLASS 4 CONCRETE BACKFILL m3 215 $26,875 $16,125 $13,330 $46,225 111 720000 LIGHT ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION m3 314 $18,840 $15,700 $15,700 $11,932 112 721006 1/2 TONNE ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION m3 525 $31,500 $26,250 $25,725 $19,950 113 721007 1/4 TONNE ROCK SLOPE PROTECTI ON m3 167 $10,020 $8,350 $8,016 $6,346 114 721010 RSP BACKING NO . 1 m3 314 $15,700 $15,700 $10,048 $11,932 115 729010 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION FABRIC m2 1933 $19,330 $1,933 $3,866 $5,026 116 731517 MINOR CONCRETE (CURB, GUTTER & SIDE WALK)) m3 333 $99,900 $83,250 $96,570 $86,580 117 750001 M ISCELLANEOUS IRON AND STEEL Kg 2578 $5,156 $7,734 $11,085 $7,218 118 800008 FENCE (TYPE BW) (4 STRAND, MET AL POST) m 7 $245 $1,050 $980 $945 119 800391 CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYPE CL -1.8) m 297 $8,910 $11,880 $10,098 $11,583 120 800395 CHAIN LINK FENCE (TYPE CL -1.8) (SLATTED) m 10 $600 $1,750 $660 $1,600 121 802596 3. 7 m CHAIN LINK GATE (TYPE CL -1.8) EA 12 $7,200 $9,600 $10,236 $9,900 122 802596A 3. 7 m CHAIN LINK GATE (TYPE CL -1.8) (SLATTED) EA 2 $1,400 $2,400 $1,920 $2,200 123 802672 4. 9 m CHAIN LINK GATE (TYPE CL -1 .8) EA 1 $800 $1,250 $1,100 $1,225 124 810111 SURVEY MONUMENTS EA 5 $2,500 $3,750 $1,350 $3,625 125 820107 DELINEATOR (CLASS 1) EA 58 $2,320 $1,450 $2,146 $1,566 126 832003 METAL BEAM GUARD RAILING (WOOD POST) m 71 $4,260 $14,200 $6,816 $14,200 127 839521 CABLE RAILING m 209 $6,270 $7,315 $5,225 $7,524 128 839565 TERMINAL SYSTEM (TYPE SRT) EA 2 $5,000 $5,000 $4,400 $4,600 129 840504 100 mm THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE m 96 $96 $72 $96 $101 130 840509 300 mm THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE m 250 $1,750 $1,375 $1,500 $1,438 131 840515 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEM ENT MARKING m2 110 $3,465 $3,850 $3,190 $3,080 132 840560 THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE (SPRAYABLE) m 48952 $48,952 $34,266 $24,476 $20,560 133 840653 PAINT TRAFFIC STRIPE m 759 $759 $493 $1214 $1,176 134 850102 PAVEMENT MARKER (REFLECTIVE) EA 3284 $9,852 $8,210 $6,568 $7,061 135 861491 MODIFY SIGNAL (LOCATION 1) LS 1 $51,100 $15,000 $15,000 $14,000 136 860352 SIGNAL (LOCATION 2) (FUTURE) LS 1 $5,800 $6,500 $5,000 $4,000 137 860353 SIGNAL (LOCATION 3) (FUTURE) LS 1 $5,800 $6,500 $5,000 $5,000 138 860354 SIGNAL (LOCATION 4) (FUTURE) LS 1 $5,700 $6,500 $5,000 $4,500 139 860355 SIGNAL (LOCATION 5) (FUTURE) LS 1 $4,600 $5,500 $4,000 $4,000 140 860356 SIGNAL (LOCATION 6) (FUTURE) LS 1 $4,600 $5,500 $4,000 $4,000 141 860357 SIGNAL (LOCATION 7) (FUTURE) LS 1 $4,600 $5,500 $4,000 $4,000 142 880358 SIGNAL (LOCATION 8) (FUTURE) LS 1 $4,600 $5,500 $5,500 $5,500 143 869055A INSTALL JOINT UTILITY TRENCH A ND DUCTS LS 1 $3,000 $35,000 $27,000 $20,000 144 860889 TRAFFIC CENSUS STATION MODIFICATION LS 1 $28,100 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 145 990000A LOWER BOOSTER STATION WITH PRESSURE REDUCING STATION EA 1 $252,000 $325,000 $364,000 $300,000 146 990000B UPPER BOOSTER STATIO N EA 1 $228,000 $225,000 $253,000 $250,000 147 993012A FIRE HYDRANT PER EVMWD STD. DWG. NO. W-8 EA 9 $22,500 $22,500 $24,300 $31,500 148 999990 MOBILIZATION (10% OF SUBTOTAL) LS 1 $1,009,393 $610,000 $700,000 $918,000 SUBTO TAL $11,103,322 $10,561,454 $11,080,088 $11,448,278 Page C-3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager Erik Galloway, Bechtel Resident Engineer THROUGH: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement No. 02-31-056 for the Realignment and Widening of State Route 74 from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km East of Wasson Canyon Road BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Direct staff to present its award recommendations to the Commission for Agreement No. 02-31-056 for the realignment and widening of the existing SR 74, Segment 1, from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km east of Wasson Canyon Road; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its September 10, 2001 meeting, the Commission authorized staff to advertise for construction bids on SR 74 Segment I. Segment I consists of the realignment and widening of the existing SR 74 from Dexter Avenue to 0.5 Km east of Wasson Canyon Road, in the City of Lake Elsinore in Riverside County. The project was advertised starting on May 20, 2002 with the bid opening scheduled for July 2, 2002. The scheduled bid opening will not provide an opportunity to bring the bid results back to the Committee unless the project delivery is delayed about 2 months due to the Commission not meeting in August. This is a safety project and a top priority of the Commission to deliver at the earliest date. Item 9 000485 AGENDA ITEM 10 • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs Committee Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning Development and Policy THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Revised CETAP Internal Corridors Budget PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the revised CETAP Internal Corridors budget which increased from $5,928,248 to $8,126,449 resulting in a total CETAP budget of $14,532,764. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: • Summary of Significant Commission Actions The Commission initiated the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) on May 12, 1999 by taking an action to recommend the County of Riverside enter into a contract with Sverdrup (now Jacobs) as the prime consultant to carry out the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP). The Commission also approved a cooperative agreement with the County of Riverside to jointly manage the project with the Commission being the lead agency for CETAP. The initial CETAP contract amount was $5,484,563 including $500,000 identified for contingency. The contingency was deemed necessary as a project of this magnitude had never taken place in the nation and it was acknowledged that modifications to the scope of work were likely to occur. On July 12, 2000, the Commission took action to move forward with Tier 1 environmental work on four priority corridors, as opposed to two corridors planned and budgeted for in the original scope of work. On September 13, 2000, the Commission approved the revised CETAP work -plan and budget totaling $12,334,563: $5,484,563 for two internal corridors, $4,900,000 for the Orange County to Riverside County corridor and $1,950,000 for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County corridor. • Item 10 ,000486 On November 8, 2000, the Commission approved the list of recommended alternatives on the two internal corridors. These alternatives were forwarded for full environmental documentation; five alternatives for each corridor were identified as preferred alternatives. On March 14, 2001, the Commission approved using the $500,000 contingency once it became apparent that the scope of work needed to address the total length of alternatives to be evaluated, approximately 100 miles for the 10 alternatives. In addition, separate EIR/EIS documents were prepared to allow each corridor to have independent utility. On September 10, 2001, the Commission reaffirmed the November 2000 list of recommended alternatives with two modifications; removal of alternatives 5a and 5b (Winchester to Temecula corridor) from the Commission's preferred list with the understanding that the alternatives would still be included in the environmental documents. The Commission also acknowledged that additional alternatives were being required for analysis in the EIR/EIS's by the Resource Agencies. The number of alternatives included in the environmental documents was fourteen (14) on the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore corridor and seven (7) on the Winchester to Temecula corridor totaling twenty-one (21) alternatives. Originally ten (10) alternatives were planned to be studied. The Commission was informed that the increase in alternatives to be studied would also increase the cost to complete the environmental process. It was anticipated that the cost would increase by approximately $300,000. The Commission approved the transfer of budget capacity from the Orange County to Riverside County corridor to cover the increase. The actual cost increase was $443,685. Revised Budget Requirements The progress of the Tier 1 environmental process for the internal corridors has been reported to the Commission on a regular basis. The magnitude and complexity of this model transportation planning study have been challenging to Resource Agency staff as well as the CETAP team. In order to provide concurrence on the selection of a preferred alternative, the Resource Agencies requested more detailed level of field surveys and mapping, additional quantitative analysis of aquatic resources and expanded qualitative discussions in our documents. All these requests resulted in increased costs. The County and RCTC staff has been working with Jacobs over the last several months to identify the additional costs resulting from the expanded work scope on the internal corridors. A CETAP budget increase of $2.2M is projected to complete work on the two internal corridors, bringing the internal corridors budget up to • e • " " " $ 8 , 1 2 6 , 4 4 9 . N o c h a n g e s t o t h e e x t e r n a l c o r r i d o r s b u d g e t s a r e p r o j e c t e d a t t h i s t i m e a n d t h e y r e m a i n a t $ 4 , 4 5 6 , 3 1 5 f o r t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y t o R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y c o r r i d o r a n d $ 1 , 9 5 0 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e M o r e n o V a l l e y t o S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y c o r r i d o r . T h e m a j o r i t y o f t h e c o s t s , a s e x p e c t e d , a r e i d e n t i f i e d f o r t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l w o r k ( + $ 1 . 1 m ) . B u d g e t a u g m e n t a t i o n i s a l s o n e c e s s a r y f o r p r o g r a m m a n a g e m e n t ( + $ 4 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) , e n g i n e e r i n g ( + $ 1 2 0 , 0 0 0 ) , m o d e l i n g ( + $ 2 4 0 , 0 0 0 ) , p u b l i c o u t r e a c h ( + $ 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 ) , a n d G I S ( + $ 4 0 , 0 0 0 ) . W h e n C E T A P w a s f i r s t s t a r t e d , f u l l f u n d i n g f o r t h e p r o j e c t h a d n o t y e t b e e n i d e n t i f i e d . S t a f f w a s d i r e c t e d t o s e e k f u n d i n g t o c o n d u c t t h e w o r k . T o d a t e w e h a v e b e e n s u c c e s s f u l i n r e c e i v i n g f u n d i n g c o m m i t m e n t s t o t a l i n g $ 8 . 6 M . $ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 o f t h i s a m o u n t i s p r o v i d e d b y S A N B A G a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y c i t i e s s p e c i f i c a l l y i d e n t i f i e d f o r u s e o n t h e M o r e n o V a l l e y t o S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y c o r r i d o r . W h i l e t h e $ 8 . 6 m i s c o m m i t t e d , n o t a l l f u n d s h a v e b e e n r e c e i v e d t o d a t e . S C A G , a s o u r d e s i g n a t e d r e c i p i e n t f o r a f e d e r a l d i s c r e t i o n a r y g r a n t , i s i n t h e p r o c e s s o f s e c u r i n g f u n d s t o p a s s o n t o u s f o r C E T A P . O n J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 , t h e C a l i f o r n i a T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( C T C ) a p p r o v e d t h e a l l o c a t i o n o f $ 1 6 3 , 0 0 0 S t a t e P l a n n i n g , P r o g r a m m i n g a n d M o n i t o r i n g f u n d s f o r f i s c a l y e a r 0 2 - 0 3 . H o w e v e r , t h e C T C d e n i e d o u r a l l o c a t i o n r e q u e s t f o r a d d i t i o n a l f u n d i n g o f $ 9 4 7 , 0 0 0 i n F Y 0 2 - 0 3 d u e t o t h e 2 0 0 2 S T I P F u n d E s t i m a t e s h o r t f a l l . T h e C T C ' s E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r h a s m a d e a c o m m i t m e n t t o w o r k w i t h u s t o s e e k a r e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h i s r e q u e s t . S t a f f i s r e p o r t i n g t h e s e h u r d l e s s o t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r s a r e a w a r e t h a t w h i l e s u f f i c i e n t f u n d i n g h a s b e e n s u c c e s s f u l l y o b t a i n e d t o c o v e r t h e w o r k c o m p l e t e d t o d a t e , t h e r e h a v e o f t e n b e e n d e l a y s i n o u r r e i m b u r s e m e n t p a y m e n t s t o t h e C o u n t y . F o r y o u r i n f o r m a t i o n , t h e f o l l o w i n g t w o t a b l e s o u t l i n e f u n d i n g c o m m i t m e n t s a n d c h a n g e s o v e r t i m e t o t h e C E T A P b u d g e t . C E T A P C o m m i t t e d F u n d i n g R C T C S T I P 2 % P l a n n i n g , P r o g r a m m i n g , a n d M o n i t o r i n g $ 3 , 2 2 1 , 8 0 9 S C A G F e d e r a l O v e r a l l W o r k P r o g r a m $ 1 , 7 8 2 , 1 6 0 T r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d C o m m u n i t y S y s t e m P r e s e r v a t i o n F e d e r a l P r o g r a m $ 1 , 3 7 2 , 9 3 3 S t a t e P l a n n i n g F u n d s $ 8 8 2 , 0 0 0 W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y C i t i e s F a i r S h a r e S u p p o r t ( $ 1 p e r c a p i t a ) $ 8 0 0 , 1 5 0 S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y a n d C i t i e s $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 S A N B A G $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 T o t a l $ 8 , 5 5 9 , 0 5 2 I t e m 1 0 ' 0 0 0 4 8 8 Approval Dates Total Budget Internal Corridors OC-RIV Corridor MV-SB Corridor Comments May 1999 $ 5,484,563 2 corridors Sept 2000 $12,334,563 $ 5,484,563 $4,900,000 $1,950,000 4 corridors Sept 2001 + $ 443,685 -$ 443,685 add.altern. Total $12,334,563 $ 5,928,248 $4,456,315 $1,950,000 9/01 budget July 2002 + $2,198,201 this request Total $14,532,764 $ 8,126,449 $4,456,315 $1,950,000 Proposed new budget Staff is recommending approval of the revised budget for the internal CETAP corridors at $8,126,446. We will continue to ardently seek funding to complete work on all four corridors. Possible funding sources include: • Additional allocations of STIP Planning, Programming and Monitoring funds • Additional support from Western Riverside County cities • Additional support from San Bernardino County • Support from Orange County • Discretionary grant funds (in cooperation with the County of Riverside, we submitted a request for a $350,000 grant specifically for the Orange County corridor on July 1st. We are also working on a $5M federal appropriation for this corridor. If successful on this federal grant, a $1.25M match would be required). Update on the Orange County Corridor • • On June 4, 2002, the Board of Supervisors considered alternatives for inclusion of the Orange County corridor as a covered activity in the MSHCP. The County was directed to continue moving ahead with the current MSHCP schedule which recognizes a future Orange County corridor but acknowledges an amendment to the MSHCP would be necessary. The Board agreed that should agreements on an alignment for the Orange County corridor be ready by September 2002, the Board would consider revisions to the MSHCP's environmental documents at that time. A technical working group has been meeting to review and update the traffic modeling for this corridor. Representatives from RCTC, Riverside County, City of Corona, OCTA, The Irvine Company, Transportation Corridors Agency, and the Building Industry Association have been in attendance. The modeling information will assist in our determination of a preferred corridor location. • Item 10 0t}O489 " A G E N D A I T E M 1 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 10, 2002 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Limited Right to Negotiate a Transit Village Concept Development at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station for STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: • • 1) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to negotiate and enter into Limited Right to Negotiate Agreement No. 03-50-901 for a Transit Village Concept for Development on Commission Owned Land at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station Site with the City of Riverside Redevelopment Agency, Creative Housing Associates and John C. Petry; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman to execute the Agreement, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In the Spring of 2001, the Property Committee received a presentation on a "Transit Village" development concept for the Riverside Downtown Metrolink station site that was brought forward by the City of Riverside's Redevelopment Agency staff, Creative Housing Associates and John C. Petry. The Committee viewed the concept favorably and requested staff to follow up on the concept. As you may be aware there are discussions in the public transit and planning/land use arenas regarding what is generically labeled as "transit oriented development". This is a concept which integrates retail/commercial and housing adjacent to transit stations. This agreement is to negotiate a transit oriented development proposal. From staff's perspective the main reason for bringing this forward is that the developers are keenly aware of the Commission's need to double the parking capacity (from 750 to 1,500) at the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station to support access to the station and use of the service. Staff has informed the developers that the doubling of parking will involve Commission owned land at the existing station and no other capital involvement by the Commission. Item 11 000490 Attached is a Limited Right to Negotiate (LRN) a Disposition and Development Agreement for the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station site which is owned, operated and controlled by the Commission. Given the need for the Commission tomaintain control of the station site due to the need for immediate parking expansion, where ever possible adjacent to the site, the agreement reserves the Commission's right to develop parcels we own on the north side (triangular property near Vine and 14`h Street) and properties the Commission does not own on the south side of the station. This flexibility provides that on -going project development and negotiations at or south of the Riverside Downtown station site can move forward. The term of the agreement is 120 calendar days and can be extended automatically with a 60 extension if it is necessary to negotiate and draft a Principal agreement to bring forward to the Commission. The agreement also provides for three (3), thirty (30) day extensions of the term if the Executive Directors of the Commission and the Redevelopment Agency without requiring agency action. Further extensions would require authorization by both boards. The agreement also includes a provision for a written three day termination notice from the Commission Executive Director without cause. This written notice can be issued if the Executive Director determines, in good faith, that the negotiations are not proceeding in manner that he believes is useful in light of the Commission's ability to manage its other responsibilities as a public agency. This clause was inserted due to the numerous projects in our capital delivery program, as well as, the need to support a public education program for the Measure "A" extension on the November 2002 ballot. Within 90 calendar days after execution of the agreement the developer is required to submit to the Commission and the Redevelopment Agency a proposed Development Program for consideration. Other than the possible lease of Commission owned property, the Commission is not obligated to provide financial assistance or participation in the development. Any proposed action which impacts Commission owned property will be brought forward to the Commission and/or the Commission's Property Committee for direction and possible action. While staff is not experienced in the development area staff believes the requisite protections for the Commission are embodied in this proposed LRN. Staff recommends approval of the agreement along with authorization for the Executive Director to further negotiate deal points, if necessary, subject to Legal Counsel review. Attachment: LRN Document • Item 1'1° 000491 " " " A g r e e m e n t N o . : 0 3 - 5 0 - 9 0 1 L I M I T E D R I G H T T O N E G O T I A T E ( T r a n s i t V i l l a g e ) A m o n g t h e R e d e v e l o p m e n t A g e n c y o f t h e C i t y o f R i v e r s i d e , R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n , a n d C r e a t i v e H o u s i n g A s s o c i a t e s a n d J o h n C . P e t r y , a n I n d i v i d u a l T h i s L i m i t e d R i g h t t o N e g o t i a t e A g r e e m e n t ( " A g r e e m e n t " ) , w h i c h i s d a t e d f o r r e f e r e n c e a s i n d i c a t e d o n t h e c o v e r p a g e , i s h e r e b y e n t e r e d i n t o b y a n d b e t w e e n t h e R E D E V E L O P M E N T A G E N C Y O F T H E C I T Y O F R I V E R S I D E , a p u b l i c b o d y , c o r p o r a t e a n d p o l i t i c ( " A g e n c y " ) , t h e R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N , a p o l i t i c a l s u b d i v i s i o n o f t h e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a , ( " R C T C " ) , C R E A T I V E H O U S I N G A S S O C I A T E S , a C a l i f o r n i a ( " C H A " ) , a n d , J O H N C P E T R Y , a n i n d i v i d u a l ( h e r e i n a f t e r , C H A a n d P e t r y a r e c o l l e c t i v e l y r e f e r r e d t o a s " D e v e l o p e r " ) a s f o l l o w s : R E C I T A L S A ) G e n e r a l P u r p o s e : A g e n c y T h i s A g r e e m e n t i s e n t e r e d i n t o a s p a r t o f t h e A g e n c y ' s e f f o r t t o i m p l e m e n t i t s R e d e v e l o p m e n t P l a n w i t h i n t h e P r o j e c t A r e a . T h e A g e n c y h a s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t m a y f a c i l i t a t e a p r o j e c t t h a t , i f c o m p l e t e d , w i l l d e c r e a s e b l i g h t a n d e n h a n c e t h e e c o n o m i c f e a s i b i l i t y o f d e v e l o p m e n t w i t h i n t h e P r o j e c t A r e a i n a m a n n e r c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e g o a l s , o b j e c t i v e s , p o l i c i e s a n d s t a n d a r d s s t a t e d i n t h e R e d e v e l o p m e n t P l a n . T h e A g e n c y h a s a l s o d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h i s A g r e e m e n t i s i n a c c o r d w i t h t h e a p p l i c a b l e s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l a w s . B ) G e n e r a l P u r p o s e : R C T C T h i s A g r e e m e n t i s e n t e r e d i n t o a s p a r t o f R C T C ' s e f f o r t t o i m p l e m e n t t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n ( " I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n " ) b y p r o v i d i n g a s s i s t a n c e f o r s e l e c t e d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o g r a m s a n d i m p r o v e m e n t s w i t h i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . R C T C h a s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t e n t e r i n g i n t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t w i l l f a c i l i t a t e R C T C ' s r e v i e w f o r s e l e c t i o n o f a p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t c o n c e p t b e i n g d e v e l o p e d b y t h e D e v e l o p e r . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g a n y p r o v i s i o n h e r e i n t o t h e c o n t r a r y , i t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t R C T C ' s o b l i g a t i o n s o r a s s i s t a n c e p u r s u a n t t o a n y a g r e e m e n t r e a c h e d p u r s u a n t t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t w i l l b e l i m i t e d t o n o n - m o n e t a r y o b l i g a t i o n s s u c h a s l e a s i n g o f R C T C s p r o p e r t y . 0 0 0 4 9 2 C) Preliminary Discussion: Developer has conducted preliminary discussions with the Agency and RCTC concerning opportunities that may be available within the Project Area for development of a Transit Village project. D) Formal Negotiations: Developer now desires to formulate a Development Program in coordination with the Agency and RCTC, which if mutually acceptable, will lead to the negotiation and preparation of a disposition and development agreement and ancillary documents ("Principal Agreement") between Developer and the Agency. The parties contemplate that such agreements will specify the scope of work to be undertaken by the Developer, will provide that the development, construction and operation of the resulting project will be consistent with the Redevelopment Plan and the Improvement Plan, will specify the type and amount of project assistance that the Agency's governing board may approve, and will specify the type and amount of project assistance that the governing board of RCTC may approve. E) Specific Purpose: The specific purpose of this Agreement is to establish a period during which Developer, RCTC, and the Agency shall negotiate exclusively with each other to formulate the Development Plan and to prepare, if appropriate, the Principal Agreement to be submitted to the governing boards of the Agency and RCTC for consideration of approval. F) Speculation not Permitted Developer acknowledges that this Agreement is not intended to, and will not be construed to, facilitate speculation or excess profit taking in real property within the meaning of California Health and Safety Code § 33437 5 as that section exists on the date of this Agreement or as it may thereafter be amended, repealed and reenacted, or otherwise modified. DEFINITIONS Agency Shall mean the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Riverside, a public body organized and existing, and exercising those governmental functions and powers, as authorized under the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code §3 3000, et seq) of the State of California The term the "Agency" shall also include any assignee of, or successor to, the rights and responsibilities of the Agency under this Agreement. City Shall mean the City of Riverside, a municipal corporation formed and existing under the laws of the State of California. The term "City" shall also include any assignee of, or successor to, its rights, powers, and responsibilities. Development Program Shall mean that program for the development, financing, construction, and operation of a project formulated by DEVELOPER in consultation with the Agency and RCTC as provided in Article II [Actions] of this Agreement. • • 000493 " " " E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e v i e w S h a l l m e a n t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n a n d a n a l y s i s o f t h e P r o j e c t ' s i m p a c t s o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d u n d e r t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y A c t ( " C E Q A " ) , P u b l i c R e s o u r c e s C o d e � 2 1 0 0 0 , e l s e q , o r o f t h e P r o j e c t ' s i m p a c t s o n a n y s p e c i e s o f p l a n t o r a n i m a l l i s t e d a s a s p e c i e s o f c o n c e r n , a t h r e a t e n e d s p e c i e s , o r a n e n d a n g e r e d s p e c i e s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d b y t h e C a l i f o r n i a E n d a n g e r e d S p e c i e s A c t ( " C E S A " ) , F i s h a n d G a m e C o d e � 2 0 5 0 , e l s e q . , a n d / o r t h e U S E n d a n g e r e d S p e c i e s A c t ( " U S E S A " ) , 1 6 U S C � 1 5 3 1 , e t s e q , o r o t h e r a p p l i c a b l e C a l i f o r n i a o r f e d e r a l l a w o r r e g u l a t i o n . E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S h a l l m e a n t h e r e s p e c t i v e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r s o f t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C a n d / o r a n y p e r s o n d e s i g n a t e d a n d a u t h o r i z e d b y t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r t o a c t i n t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r ' s c a p a c i t y w i t h r e g a r d t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t . I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n S h a l l m e a n t h a t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n a d o p t e d o n N o v e m b e r 8 , 1 9 8 8 b y t h e V o t e r o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a s p a r t o f t h e i r a p p r o v a l o f M e a s u r e A a u t h o r i z i n g c o l l e c t i o n o f a o n e - h a l f p e r c e n t ( 1 / 2 % ) r e t a i l t r a n s a c t i o n a n d u s e t a x t o f u n d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o g r a m s a n d i m p r o v e m e n t s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y . L o c a l R e g u l a t i o n s S h a l l m e a n a l l t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e C i t y ' s G e n e r a l P l a n , t h e C i t y ' s M u n i c i p a l C o d e ( i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , a l l z o n i n g , d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d b u i l d i n g s t a n d a r d s , r e g u l a t i o n s , a n d p r o c e d u r e s , a n d a l l u n i f o r m c o d e s i n c o r p o r a t e d t h e r e i n ) , a n y a p p l i c a b l e s p e c i f i c p l a n , t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f a n y a p p l i c a b l e m a p a p p r o v e d u n d e r t h e S u b d i v i s i o n M a p A c t ( G o v e r n m e n t C o d e � 6 6 4 1 0 , e t s e q ) , a n y m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s i m p o s e d a s a r e s u l t o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e v i e w f o r t h e P r o j e c t , a l l a s t h e y e x i s t o n t h e d a t e o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t o r a s t h e y m a y t h e r e a f t e r b e a m e n d e d , r e p e a l e d a n d r e e n a c t e d , o r o t h e r w i s e m o d i f i e d . P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t S h a l l m e a n t h e D i s p o s i t i o n a n d D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t a n d a n c i l l a r y a g r e e m e n t s t o b e n e g o t i a t e d a n d d r a f t e d b y t h e p a r t i e s s u b j e c t t o t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g a n y p r o v i s i o n s h e r e i n t o t h e c o n t r a r y , t h e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t s h a l l r e q u i r e t h e a p p r o v a l o f R C T C t o t h e e x t e n t s u c h P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t a f f e c t s R C T C ' s p r o p e r t y . P r o j e c t C o n c e p t S h a l l m e a n t h a t p r o j e c t c o n c e p t t h a t i s t o b e d e v e l o p e d b y D e v e l o p e r a s p r o v i d e d i n A r t i c l e I I [ R e q u i r e d A c t i o n s ) o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t . P r o j e c t A p p r o v a l s S h a l l m e a n a n y l a n d u s e , d e v e l o p m e n t , a n d b u i l d i n g a p p r o v a l s a n d e n t i t l e m e n t s r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y f o r t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e P r o j e c t , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , G e n e r a l P l a n a m e n d m e n t s , S p e c i f i c P l a n a m e n d m e n t s , z o n e c h a n g e s , z o n e v a r i a n c e s , c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p e r m i t s , s i t e p l a n r e v i e w , g r a d i n g p e r m i t s , b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , a c t i o n s u n d e r t h e S u b d i v i s i o n M a p A c t , e n c r o a c h m e n t p e r m i t s , b u s i n e s s l i c e n s e s a n d o t h e r d e v e l o p m e n t a p p r o v a l s a s m a y b e r e q u i r e d u n d e r t h e R i v e r s i d e M u n i c i p a l C o d e . P r o j e c t A r e a S h a l l m e a n t h a t p o r t i o n o f t h e C i t y t h a t i s s u b j e c t t o , a n d t h e b o u n d a r i e s o f w h i c h a r e s p e c i f i c a l l y d e s c r i b e d i n , t h e R e d e v e l o p m e n t P l a n f o r t h e C i t y . 0 . 0 9 4 9 1 : Public Improvements Shall mean those public improvements, including but not limited to, streets, street lights, traffic signals, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkway landscaping, irrigation systems, storm drains, sewers, and other public facilities related to the Project and required to be constructed and installed in the existing public rights -of -way and/or on areas of the Site to be dedicated to the City by the Developer as a condition of obtaining the Project Approvals. RCTC Shall mean the Riverside County Transportation Commission, a political subdivision of the State of California The term the "RCTC" shall also include any assignee of, or successor to, the rights and responsibilities of the RCTC under this Agreement. Redevelopment Plan Shall mean that plan of redevelopment for the Merged Downtown/Airport Industrial Redevelopment Project that was enacted by the Agency pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code §33000, et seq., on December 1, 1976 by Ordinance 4355, and as subsequently amended by Ordinance 4800 on June 10, 1980, by Ordinance 5240 on November 27, 1984, by Ordinance 5872 (merger) on September 25, 1990, by Ordinance 6191 on December 20, 1994, and by Ordinance 6374 on May 6, 1997. Target Site Shall mean that certain parcel or those certain parcels of real property designated by Developer as the location for development of the Project Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, during the Term of this Agreement, RCTC reserves the right to control its property assets at the Downtown Riverside Metrolink station, as well as the right to participate with other property owners and/or developers regarding the South side of the Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station in order to address commuter rail parking needs as identified by RCTC. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I - PERIOD OF NEGOTIATION 1.1 Extent of Negotiations The Agency and RCTC agree that, during the Term of this Agreement, they shall negotiate with Developer concerning providing certain assistance to the development of the Project Concept within the Project Area However, nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Agency from complying with the Agency's Owner Participation Program within the Project Area as may be required under Health and Safety Code §33339, §33339 5 and §33345 Developer agrees that, during the Term of this Agreement, it will negotiate exclusively with the Agency and RCTC concerning development of the Project Concept within the Project Area. • ©00z05 " " " 1 . 2 T e r m T h e p e r i o d d u r i n g w h i c h n e g o t i a t i o n s u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t f o r t h e D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m w i l l b e c o n d u c t e d s h a l l b e o n e h u n d r e d a n d t w e n t y ( 1 2 0 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s c o m m e n c i n g o n t h e f i r s t b u s i n e s s d a y f o l l o w i n g t h e E f f e c t i v e D a t e o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t ( " T e r m " ) , u n l e s s e x t e n d e d b y o p e r a t i o n o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t o r b y m u t u a l a g r e e m e n t o f t h e p a r t i e s 1 . 3 E x t e n s i o n o f T e r m N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g S e c t i o n 1 2 , i f a D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m m u t u a l l y a c c e p t a b l e t o D e v e l o p e r , t h e A g e n c y , a n d R C T C h a s b e e n a g r e e d u p o n , t h e n t h e T e r m s h a l l a u t o m a t i c a l l y b e e x t e n d e d f o r a p e r i o d o f s i x t y ( 6 0 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s t o e n a b l e t h e s t a f f o f t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C , a n d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o f D e v e l o p e r t o n e g o t i a t e a n d d r a f t t h e P n n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t , a n d t o c o o r d i n a t e s u c h a c t i o n s a s a r e n e c e s s a r y t o b r i n g t h e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t b e f o r e t h e r e s p e c t i v e g o v e r n i n g b o a r d s o f t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f a p p r o v a l I t i s u n d e r s t o o d t h a t t h e A g e n c y ' s g o v e r n i n g b o a r d s h a l l h a v e s o l e d i s c r e t i o n t o a p p r o v e o r d i s a p p r o v e t h e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t a n d t h a t R C T C ' s g o v e r n i n g b o a r d s h a l l a l s o h a v e s o l e d i s c r e t i o n t o a p p r o v e o r d i s a p p r o v e t h e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t T h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r s o f t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C s h a l l h a v e a u t h o r i t y t o a g r e e , o n b e h a l f o f t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e e n t i t i e s , t o e x t e n d t h e T e r m , w h e t h e r t h e i n i t i a l T e r m s p e c i f i e d i n s e c t i o n 1 2 o r t h e a u t o m a t i c a l l y e x t e n d e d T e r m s p e c i f i e d i n t h i s S e c t i o n 1 3 , b y i n c r e m e n t s o f u p t o t h i r t y ( 3 0 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s , b u t n o t t o e x c e e d a n a g g r e g a t e o f n i n e t y ( 9 0 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s w i t h o u t s u b m i t t i n g t h e q u e s t i o n t o t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e g o v e r n i n g b o a r d s 1 . 4 E x p i r a t i o n o f T e r m U n l e s s t h e T e r m i s e x t e n d e d a s p r o v i d e d i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t , i f a t t h e e n d o f t h e T e r m t h e A g e n c y , R C T C a n d D e v e l o p e r h a v e n o t a g r e e d u p o n a m u t u a l l y a c c e p t a b l e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t , t h e n t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l a u t o m a t i c a l l y e x p i r e a n d t e r m i n a t e U p o n s u c h t e r m i n a t i o n , a l l p a r t i e s a g r e e t h a t n o p a r t y s h a l l h a v e a n y f u r t h e r r i g h t s o r o b l i g a t i o n s t o t h e o t h e r p a r t i e s u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t e x c e p t f o r a n y r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s t h a t m a y s u r v i v e t h e t e r m i n a t i o n h e r e o f , i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h s p e c i f i c p r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t I n o r d e r t o a c c o m m o d a t e p u b l i c n o t i c e a n d h e a r i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d t h e p o s s i b l e n e e d f o r c o n t i n u a n c e o f a p u b l i c h e a r i n g , t h e T e r m , n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g a n y t h i n g t o t h e c o n t r a r y i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t , s h a l l n o t e x p i r e o n c e t h e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t h a s b e e n a g e n d i z e d f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f a p p r o v a l b y t h e A g e n c y ' s g o v e r n i n g b o a r d o r t h e g o v e r n i n g b o a r d o f R C T C r e s p e c t i v e l y , i n s t e a d t h e T e r m s h a l l b e c o n t i n u e d d a y t o d a y , f o r a r e a s o n a b l e p e r i o d n o t t o e x c e e d f o r t y - f i v e ( 4 5 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s , a s n e c e s s a r y t o a c c o m m o d a t e p u b l i c n o t i c e a n d h e a r i n g a n d t h e r e s p e c t i v e g o v e r n i n g b o a r d ' s f r i l l c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e m a t t e r 1 . 5 T e r m i n a t i o n b y a n y p a r t y t o n e g o t i a t e i n g o o d f a i t h o r t o p e r f o r m a n y o t h e r o f i t s d u t i e s a s p r o v i d e d i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e a n e v e n t o f d e f a u l t h e r e u n d e r A n o n - d e f a u l t i n g p a r t y m a y g i v e w r i t t e n n o t i c e o f a d e f a u l t t o a d e f a u l t i n g p a r t y , s p e c i f y i n g t h e n a t u r e o f t h e d e f a u l t a n d t h e a c t i o n r e q u i r e d t o c u r e t h e d e f a u l t I f t h e d e f a u l t r e m a i n s u n c u r e d f o r f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s f r o m a n d a f t e r s e r v i c e o f s u c h n o t i c e , a n o n - d e f a u l t i n g p a r t y m a y t e r m i n a t e t h i s A g r e e m e n t w i t h o u t c o s t , e x p e n s e o r l i a b i l i t y t o e i t h e r p a r t y T h e t i m e p r o v i d e d t o c u r e a d e f a u l t s h a l l n o t a c t t o e x t e n d t h e T e r m o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t In addition, RCTC may terminate this Agreement without cause upon three (3) days ,written notice if RCTC's Executive Director determines, in good faith, that the negotiations pursuant to this Agreement are not proceeding in a manner that RCTC Executive Director believes is useful in light of RCTC's ability to manage its other responsibilities as a public agency RCTC's Executive Director may base his decision to terminate under this paragraph on factors, including, but not limited to, the progress of negotiations under this LRN among all parties hereto, the staffing available to RCTC for its commitments hereunder, and RCTC's commitments to other RCTC projects Each party acknowledges that it is aware of the meaning and legal effect of California Civil Code Section 1542, which provides "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him would have materially affected his settlement with the debtor" Civil Code Section 1542 notwithstanding, it is both parties' intention to be bound by the limitation on damages and remedies set forth in this Section 1 5, and each party releases any and all claims against the other party for monetary damages or other legal or equitable relief related to such breach, whether or not such released claims were known or unknown to it as of its entry into this kRN Each party waives the benefits of Civil Code Section 1542 and all other statutes and judicial decisions (whether state or federal) of similar effect 1.6 Good Faith Dealings The parties agree that they shall each negotiate in good faith and diligently carry out their obligations, within the time required, under this Agreement ARTICLE II - REQUIRED ACTIONS 2.1 Target Site Identification Within thirty (30) calendar days from and after the Effective Date of this Agreement, Developer shall prepare and submit to the Agency and RCTC for their consideration, a list of properties within the Project Area that are potentially suitable for development in accordance with the current Project Concept The list shall present the Target Sites in order of preference and shall, to the extent available, list qualities of the site including price, size, current use, zoning, the assessor's parcel number, the current owner(s), any apparent defects in the Target Site(s) that would require remediation or correction, and such other information as the Agency and RCTC may reasonably request Thereafter, the Agency, RCTC and Developer shall jointly investigate the feasibility of acquiring the Target Sites in order of preference 2.2 Project Concept The conceptual project currently under consideration by the parties is the development of a Transit Village as contemplated under the Transit Village Development Planning Act of 1994 [ Code §65460 to §65460 10], and consistent with the Improvement Plan, that is to consist of apartments, condominiums, parking structures, commercial uses and landscaped open spaces on the Target Site ("Project Concept") • • • 000497 " 2 . 3 D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m W i t h i n n i n e t y ( 9 0 ) c a l e n d a r d a y s f r o m a n d a f t e r t h e E f f e c t i v e D a t e o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t , D e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r e p a r e a n d s u b m i t t o t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C f o r t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e c o n s i d e r a t i o n , a p r o p o s e d D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m c o n t a i n i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g e l e m e n t s 2 . 3 . 1 S c o p e o f D e v e l o p m e n t A p r o p o s e d s c o p e o f d e v e l o p m e n t ( " S c o p e o f D e v e l o p m e n t " ) , w h i c h s h a l l i n c l u d e , a t a m i n i m u m , a d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e P r o j e c t C o n c e p t t o b e c o n s t r u c t e d i n c l u d i n g a p r o p o s e d c o n c e p t u a l s i t e p l a n , c o n c e p t u a l b u i l d i n g e l e v a t i o n s , a n d c o n c e p t u a l l a n d s c a p e p l a n s f o r t h e o p e n a r e a s , t h e t y p e a n d q u a l i t y o f a p a r t m e n t s , i n c l u d i n g t a r g e t r e n t l e v e l s a n d a m e n i t i e s , t h e t y p e o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f a c i l i t i e s t o w h i c h a c c e s s w o u l d b e f a c i l i t a t e d a n d t h e m a n n e r i n w h i c h t h e p r o j e c t w o u l d b e d e s i g n e d t o f a c i l i t a t e a c c e s s t o s u c h t r a n s p o r t a t i o n T h e S c o p e o f D e v e l o p m e n t m u s t a l s o i n c l u d e a n y p r o p o s e d p h a s i n g o f d e v e l o p m e n t a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n 2 . 3 . 2 S c h e d u l e o f P e r f o r m a n c e A p r o p o s e d s c h e d u l e o f p e r f o r m a n c e ( " S c h e d u l e o f P e r f o r m a n c e " ) f o r i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e S c o p e o f D e v e l o p m e n t , w h i c h s h a l l i n c l u d e , a t a m i n i m u m , p r o p o s e d m i l e s t o n e s f o r o b t a i n i n g p r o j e c t a p p r o v a l s , c o m m e n c i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n , a n d c o m p l e t i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n 2 . 3 . 3 F i n a n c i a l P r o F o r m a A c o n c e p t u a l f i n a n c i a l p r o f o r m a a n a l y s i s t h a t c o n t a i n s ( i ) a l i s t o f p r o p o s e d s o u r c e s a n d u s e o f f i n d s f o r a c q u i s i t i o n , c o n s t r u c t i o n , a n d p e r m a n e n t f i n a n c i n g o f t h e P r o j e c t C o n c e p t , ( i i ) a d e v e l o p m e n t b u d g e t f o r t h e P r o j e c t C o n c e p t i n c l u d i n g s o u r c e s a n d u s e a n a l y s i s f o r t h e p e r i o d o f c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d f o r o p e r a t i o n f o r t h e p e n o d o f f i v e y e a r s t h e r e a f t e r , ( i i i i ) a n o p e r a t i n g b u d g e t f o r t h e P r o j e c t C o n c e p t , a n d ( i v ) a l l a s s u m p t i o n s u n d e r l y i n g t h e a f o r e m e n t i o n e d 2 . 3 . 4 R e q u e s t e d A s s i s t a n c e A d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e t y p e , a m o u n t , a n d u s e o f f i n a n c i a l a n d / o r o t h e r a s s i s t a n c e t h a t D e v e l o p e r r e q u e s t s f r o m t h e A g e n c y a n d a d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e t y p e , a m o u n t a n d u s e o f a s s i s t a n c e t h a t D e v e l o p e r r e q u e s t s f r o m R C T C i n o r d e r t o u n d e r t a k e a n d c o m p l e t e t h e S c o p e o f D e v e l o p m e n t 2 . 3 . 5 C o n s u l t a n t s T h e n a m e s a n d q u a l i f i c a t i o n s o f p r o f e s s i o n a l s a n d c o n s u l t a n t s t h a t D e v e l o p e r p r o p o s e s t o u s e i n p l a n n i n g f o r , c o n s t r u c t i n g , a n d o p e r a t i n g t h e P r o j e c t , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , t h e a r c h i t e c t , c o n t r a c t o r , a c q u i s i t i o n a g e n t , a n d m a n a g e r 2 . 3 . 6 R C T C I n f o r m a t i o n A p r o p o s e d s c o p e o f s e r v i c e s t o b e p e r f o r m e d b y D e v e l o p e r u n d e r t h e P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t w i t h R C T C 2 . 3 . 7 S u p p l e m e n t a l I n f o r m a t i o n A n y s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n r e a s o n a b l y r e q u i r e d b y t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C t o r e v i e w a n d a n a l y z e t h e D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m i o p p 4 9 s 2.4 Confidential Information The Agency and RCTC acknowledge that Developer is a private, closely held entity and agrees to consider all financial and proprietary information submitted to them by Developer, to the fullest extent permitted under the California Public Records Act [Code § 6250 et seq} and shall refrain from releasing such information unless the respective legal counsels for the Agency and RCTC determine, after consultation with Developer's legal counsel, that the release of the information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the Agency and/or RCTC shall notify Developer of the decision to release the information 2.5 Agency and RCTC Review of Development Program Within forty-five (45) calendar days of Developer submitting a complete Development Program as required under Section 2 3 [ Program] of this Agreement, the Agency and RCTC shall complete their review of the Development Program, provide their respective written comments to Developer, and consult with Developer in a good faith effort to arrive at a mutually agreeable Development Program The Agency and RCTC shall provide Developer with written notice when and if their respective Executive Directors have approved or disapproved the Development Program Approval by the Executive Directors shall be sufficient to commence drafting of the Principal Agreement, however, in no event shall approval of the Development Program by the Executive Directors bind the governing board of either the Agency or RCTC or otherwise vest Developer with any right or entitlement to develop any project, to put any property to any specific use, or to receive any assistance or funding from the Agency and/or RCTC 2.6 Preparation of Principal Agreement If the Executive Directors have both approved the Development Program prior to expiration of the Term, unless such is extended by mutual agreement of the parties, then the Agency and RCTC shall prepare and submit a draft Principal Agreement to Developer, within forty-five (45) calendar days of the approval of the Development Program The Principal Agreement shall incorporate the material terms of the Development Program as well as such other standard and customary provisions required in such agreement Thereafter, Developer shall diligently review the draft agreements and consult with the Agency and RCTC respectively in a good faith effort to arrive at a Principal Agreement having a mutually agreeable form and content that may be submitted to the respective governing boards of the Agency and RCTC for consideration of approval within the time provided in Section 1 3 [ of this Agreement 2.6.1 Agency Assistance It is the intent of the parties that the type, amount, and extent of Agency assistance that may be provided to facilitate the Scope of Development shall be negotiated to the fullest extent possible during the Term of the Agreement Notwithstanding the foregoing or approval of the Development Program by Agency's Executive Director, such events and actions shall not limit the discretion of the Agency's governing board to approve, disapprove, or modify such assistance • tx r 606498 " " " 2 . 6 . 2 R C T C A s s i s t a n c e I t i s t h e i n t e n t o f t h e p a r t i e s t h a t t h e t y p e , a m o u n t a n d e x t e n t o f a s s i s t a n c e t o b e p r o v i d e d b y R C T C f o r t h e S c o p e o f D e v e l o p m e n t s h a l t b e n e g o t i a t e d t o t h e f u l l e s t e x t e n t p o s s i b l e d u r i n g t h e T e r m o f t h e A g r e e m e n t N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e f o r e g o i n g o r a p p r o v a l o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m b y R C T C ' s E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , s u c h e v e n t s a n d a c t i o n s s h a l l n o t l i m i t t h e d i s c r e t i o n o f R C T C ' s g o v e r n i n g b o a r d t o a p p r o v e , d i s a p p r o v e , o r m o d i f y s u c h a s s i s t a n c e N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g a n y p r o v i s i o n h e r e i n t o t h e c o n t r a r y , i t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t R C T C ' s o b l i g a t i o n s o r a s s i s t a n c e p u r s u a n t t o a n y a g r e e m e n t r e a c h e d p u r s u a n t t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t w i l l b e l i m i t e d t o n o n - m o n e t a r y o b l i g a t i o n s s u c h a s l e a s i n g o f R C T C ' s p r o p e r t y 2 . 6 . 3 N o V e s t e d R i g h t s / S u b s e q u e n t D i s c r e t i o n a r y A p p r o v a l s N e i t h e r a p p r o v a l o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t P r o g r a m b y A g e n c y ' s E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r n o r s t a f f a p p r o v a l o f a P r i n c i p a l A g r e e m e n t s h a l l v e s t D e v e l o p e r w i t h a n y r i g h t o r e n t i t l e m e n t t o c o n s t r u c t , o p e r a t e , o r u s e t h e c o n t e m p l a t e d p r o j e c t o r a n y p r o p e r t y a s s o c i a t e d t h e r e w i t h D e v e l o p e r u n d e r s t a n d s , a c k n o w l e d g e s , a n d a g r e e s t h a t i t w i l l b e r e q u i r e d t o p r e p a r e , f i l e , a n d p r o c e s s a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r , a n d t o o b t a i n , a l l P r o j e c t A p p r o v a l s a n d E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e v i e w , a n d t o i n s t a l l a l l P u b l i c I m p r o v e m e n t s , w h i c h t h e C i t y a n d / o r a n y o t h e r g o v e r n m e n t a l e n t i t y h a v i n g j u r i s d i c t i o n m a y l e g a l l y r e q u i r e f o r t h e c o n t e m p l a t e d p r o j e c t D e v e l o p e r f u r t h e r u n d e r s t a n d s , a c k n o w l e d g e s , a n d a g r e e s t h a t c o n s t r u c t i o n , u s e , a n d o p e r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t e m p l a t e d p r o j e c t i s s u b j e c t t o d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w ( i n c l u d i n g a r c h i t e c t u r a l a n d d e s i g n r e v i e w ) a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e C i t y , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , t h e C i t y C o u n c i l , C i t y P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n , C i t y B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t a n d C i t y P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , a n d t h a t n o t h i n g i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t i s , o r s h a l l b e i n t e r p r e t e d t o b e , a n a g r e e m e n t b y t h e A g e n c y , C i t y , o r R C T C t o a p p r o v e o r i s s u e a n y a p p r o v a l s , e n t i t l e m e n t s , o r p e r m i t s f o r t h e c o n t e m p l a t e d 2 7 M u t u a l C o o p e r a t i o n T h e p a r t i e s a g r e e t o c o o p e r a t e w i t h o n e a n o t h e r a n d t h e i r c o n s u l t a n t s a n d t o s u p p l y i n f o r m a t i o n i n t h e p o s s e s s i o n o r c o n t r o l o f t h e p a r t y t h a t m a y b e r e a s o n a b l y n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e o t h e r p a r t y t o c o m p l e t e t h e i r o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t A R T I C L E I I I - I N S U R A N C E A N D I N D E M N I T Y 3 . 1 D e v e l o p e r ' s L i a b i l i t y I n s u r a n c e D e v e l o p e r s h a l l , a t i t s s o l e e x p e n s e , o b t a i n a n d k e e p i n f o r c e d u r i n g t h e T e r m , a n d a n y e x t e n s i o n t h e r e o f , a p o l i c y o f c o m m e r c i a l g e n e r a l l i a b i l i t y i n s u r a n c e i n a n o c c u r r e n c e f o r m p r o v i d i n g f o r b r o a d f o r m p r o p e r t y d a m a g e c o v e r a g e , b r o a d f o r m c o n t r a c t u a l c o v e r a g e , p e r s o n a l i n j u r y , b o d i l y i n j u r y , a n d a d v e r t i s i n g i n j u r y c o v e r a g e w i t h e m p l o y e e e x c l u s i o n a s t o e a c h n a m e d i n s u r e d d e l e t e d , a n d p r o d u c t s a n d c o m p l e t e o p e r a t i o n s c o v e r a g e , i n s u r i n g D e v e l o p e r , a n d n a m i n g A g e n c y , C i t y , a n d R C T C a s a n a d d i t i o n a l n a m e d i n s u r e d s , a g a i n s t a n y l i a b i l i t y a r i s i n g o u t o f o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e p e r f o r m a n c e i f D e v e l o p e r ' s o b l i g a t i o n u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t b y t h e o f f i c e r s , d i r e c t o r s , e m p l o y e e s a n d a g e n t s o f 0 0 0 5 0 0 . Developer. Such insurance policy shall have (1) a combined single limit for both bodily injury or death in an amount not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000 00), and (ii) a limit for both bodily injury or death in one accident or occurrence or for property damage in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000 00), which amounts shall be increased from time to time as reasonably required by Agency Such insurance policy and each portion thereof shall be in the broadest and most comprehensive form available in the market at the time such policy is issued or amended The policy shall insure performance by Developer of the indemnity provisions of Section 3 4 [ Indemnity] of this Agreement The limits of said insurance shalt not limit the liability of Developer hereunder 3.2 Worker's Compensation Insurance Developer shall, at its expense, obtain and keep in effect (or cause any contractor to procure and keep in effect), Worker's Compensation Insurance (including employer's liability in an amount satisfactory to Agency and RCTC and if applicable, insurance covering claims of workers against employers arising under federal law) covering all employees of Developer and any contractor and, if required under applicable law, any subcontractor engaged in work on, or with respect to, the Target Site, in such amount as is reasonably satisfactory to Agency and RCTC and in the minimum amount for one (1) person of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000 00), and in the minimum amount for one (1) accident or occurrence of not less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($ 500,000.00) 3.3 Insurance Policies All of Developer's insurance shall be primary insurance written in a form satisfactory to Agency by companies licensed in California acceptable to Agency (which must be Class IX A or better as rated by Best's Insurance Reports) and shall specifically provide that such policies shall not be subject to cancellation or other change except after at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of Agency and RCTC Copies of the policies, together with satisfactory evidence of payment of premiums shall be deposited with Agency on or prior to the date hereof, and upon each renewal of such policies, which shall be effected not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the term of such coverage 3.4 General Indemnity Except as to the sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of Agency, City, or RCTC, Developer expressly agrees to and shall indemnify, defend, release, and hold Agency, City, and RCTC and their respective officers, officials, agents, servants, employees, attorneys and contractors harmless from and against, any action, liability, loss, damage, entry, cost, or expense (including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, expert fees, and court costs) that arises out of or is in any way connected with the performance of Developer's obligations under this Agreement by any officer, director, managing partner, employee, or agent of Developer This indemnification provision shall apply to any acts or omissions, willful misconduct or negligent conduct, whether active or passive, on the part of the employees, agents, servants, or subcontractors of • 000501. " " " D e v e l o p e r . T h e p a r t i e s e x p r e s s l y a g r e e t h a t a n y p a y m e n t , a t t o r n e y s ' f e e s , c o s t s o r e x p e n s e t h a t t h e A g e n c y , C i t y , a n d / o r R C T C i n c u r s o r m a k e s t o , o r o n b e h a l f o f , a n i n j u r e d e m p l o y e e u n d e r A g e n c y ' s o r R C T C ' s s e l f a d m i n i s t e r e d w o r k e r s ' c o m p e n s a t i o n i s i n c l u d e d a s a l o s s , e x p e n s e o r c o s t f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f t h i s p r o v i s i o n A g e n c y , C i t y a n d R C T C s h a l l n o t b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a n y a c t s , e r r o r s o r o m i s s i o n s o f a n y p e r s o n o r e n t i t y e x c e p t A g e n c y , C i t y , a n d R C T C a n d t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e o f f i c e r s , a g e n t s , s e r v a n t s , e m p l o y e e s o r c o n t r a c t o r s T h e p a r t i e s e x p r e s s l y a g r e e t h a t t h e o b l i g a t i o n s o f D e v e l o p e r u n d e r t h i s S e c t i o n s h a l l s u r v i v e t h e e x p i r a t i o n o r e a r l y t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e A g r e e m e n t A R T I C L E I V - G E N E R A L . P R O V I S I O N S 4 . 1 R e m e d i e s f o r B r e a c h I n t h e e v e n t o f a n u n c u r e d d e f a u l t b y e i t h e r p a r t y t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t , t h e s o l e r e m e d y o f t h e o t h e r p a r t y s h a l l b e t o t e r m i n a t e t h i s A g r e e m e n t F o l l o w i n g s u c h t e r m i n a t i o n , n e i t h e r p a r t y s h a l l h a v e a n y f u r t h e r r i g h t s , r e m e d i e s , o r o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t e x c e p t f o r a n y r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s t h a t m a y s u r v i v e t h e t e r m i n a t i o n h e r e o f , i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h s p e c i f i c p r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t 4 . 2 N o W a i v e r F a i l u r e t o i n s i s t o n a n y o n e o c c a s i o n u p o n s t r i c t c o m p l i a n c e w i t h a n y o f t h e t e r m s , c o v e n a n t s o r c o n d i t i o n s h e r e o f s h a l l n o t b e d e e m e d a w a i v e r o f s u c h t e r m , c o v e n a n t o r c o n d i t i o n , n o r s h a l l a n y w a i v e r o r r e l i n q u i s h m e n t o f a n y r i g h t s o r p o w e r s h e r e u n d e r a t a n y o n e t i m e , o r m o r e t i m e s , b e d e e m e d a w a i v e r o r r e l i n q u i s h m e n t o f s u c h o t h e r r i g h t o r p o w e r a t a n y o t h e r t i m e o r t i m e s 4 . 3 A s s i g n m e n t N e i t h e r p a r t y s h a l l t r a n s f e r a n y r i g h t , i n t e r e s t , o r o b l i g a t i o n i n o r u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t t o a n y o t h e r e n t i t y w i t h o u t t h e p r i o r w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f t h e o t h e r p a r t y , i n i t s s o l e d i s c r e t i o n I n a n y e v e n t , n o a s s i g n m e n t s h a l l b e m a d e u n l e s s t h e a s s i g n e e e x p r e s s l y a s s u m e s t h e o b l i g a t i o n s o f a s s i g n o r u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t i n w r i t i n g s a t i s f a c t o r y t o t h e o t h e r p a r t y 4 . 4 N o n d i s c r i m i n a t i o n i n E m p l o y m e n t D e v e l o p e r c o v e n a n t s a n d a g r e e s f o r i t s e l f , i t s s u c c e s s o r s a n d a s s i g n s a n d a n y s u c c e s s o r - i n - i n t e r e s t t o t h e T a r g e t S i t e o r p a r t t h e r e o f , t h a t a l l p e r s o n s e m p l o y e d b y o r a p p l y i n g f o r e m p l o y m e n t b y i t , i t s a f f i l i a t e s , s u b s i d i a r i e s , o r h o l d i n g c o m p a n i e s , a n d a l l s u b c o n t r a c t o r s , b i d d e r s a n d v e n d o r s , a r e a n d w i l l b e t r e a t e d e q u a l l y b y i t w i t h o u t r e g a r d t o , o r b e c a u s e o f r a c e , c o l o r , r e l i g i o n , a n c e s t r y , n a t i o n a l o n g i n { s e x , a g e , p r e g n a n c y , c h i l d b i r t h , o r r e l a t e d m e d i c a l c o n d i t i o n , m e d i c a l c o n d i t i o n ' - ( c a n c e r r e l a t e d ) o r p h y s i c a l o r m e n t a l d i s a b i l i t y , a n d i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h T i t l e V I I o f t h e C i v i l R i g h t s A c t o f 1 9 6 4 , 4 2 U S C � 2 0 0 , e l s e q , t h e F e d e r a l E q u a l P a y A c t o f 1 9 6 3 , 2 9 U S C � 2 0 6 ( d ) , t h e A g e D i s c r i m i n a t i o n i n E m p l o y m e n t A c t o f 1 9 6 7 , 2 9 U S C � 6 2 1 , e l s e q . , t h e I m m i g r a t i o n D i s c r i m i n a t i o n i n E m p l o y m e n t A c t o f 1 9 6 7 , 2 9 U S C � 6 2 1 , e t s e q , t h e I m m i g r a t i o n R e f o r m a n d C o n t r o l A c t o f 1 9 8 6 , 8 U S C � 1 3 2 4 b , e t s e q , 4 2 U S C � 1 9 8 1 , t h e C a l i f o r n i a F a i r E m p l o y m e n t a n d H o u s i n g A c t , C a l i f o r n i a G o v e r n m e n t C o d e � 1 2 9 0 0 , e t s e q , t h e C a l i f o r n i a E q u a l P a y L a w , C a l i f o r n i a L a b o r C o d e � 1 1 9 7 5 , C a l i f o r n i a G o v e r n m e n t C o d e � 1 1 1 3 5 , t h e A m e r i c a n s w i t h D i s a b i l i t i e s A c t , ` � 0 0 5 2 42 U S C §12101, et seq, and all other anti -discrimination laws and regulations for the United States and the State of California as they now exist or may hereafter be amended 4.5 Applicable LawThe laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement 4.6 Compliance with Laws The Developer covenants and agrees for itself, its successors and assigns and any successor -in -interest to the Target Site or part thereof, that it shall operate and maintain the Project in conformity with the Redevelopment Plan, Local Regulations, and alt applicable state and federal laws including all applicable labor standards, disabled and handicapped access requirements, including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U S C §12101, et seq and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code §51, et seq 4.7 Non -liability of Agency Officials and Employees No board member, official, consultant, attorney, or employee of the Agency shall be personally liable to Developer, or any successor, or assign, or any person claiming under or through them, in the event of any default or breach by the Agency or for any amount that may become due to Developer or to its successor, or on any obligations arising under this Agreement 4.8 Conflicts of Interest No board member, official, consultant, attorney, or employee of the Agency shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement that affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested 4.9 Warranty Against Payment of Consideration for Agreement Developer represents and warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement, other than payments to attorneys or consultants retained by Developer to assist it in the negotiation of this Agreement, excepting however, any contributions that this Agreement requires Developer to make to the Project 4.10 No Third Party Beneficiaries This Agreement and the CC&R's are for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Agency, City, RCTC, and Developer No other parties or entities are intended to be, or shall be considered, a beneficiary of the performance of any of the parties' obligations under this Agreement 4.11 Integration This Agreement consists of pages 1 through _, inclusive, and Attachments _ through attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof • ,.000503 " " " 4 . 1 2 R e c i t a l s a n d D e f i n i t i o n s T h e R e c i t a l s a n d D e f i n i t i o n s s e t f o r t h a t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t a r e a s u b s t a n t i v e a n d i n t e g r a l p a r t o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t a n d a r e i n c o r p o r a t e d b y r e f e r e n c e i n t h e O p e r a t i v e P r o v i s i o n s o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t 4 . 1 3 T i t l e s a n d C a p t i o n s T i t l e s a n d c a p t i o n s a r e f o r c o n v e n i e n c e o f r e f e r e n c e o n l y a n d d o n o t d e f i n e , d e s c r i b e o r l i m i t t h e s c o p e o r t h e i n t e n t o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t o r a n y o f i t s t e r m s R e f e r e n c e t o s e c t i o n n u m b e r s a r e t o s e c t i o n s i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t u n l e s s e x p r e s s l y s t a t e d o t h e r w i s e 4 . 1 4 I n t e r p r e t a t i o n T h e A g e n c y a n d D e v e l o p e r a c k n o w l e d g e t h a t t h i s A g r e e m e n t i s t h e p r o d u c t o f m u t u a l a r m s - l e n g t h n e g o t i a t i o n a n d d r a f t i n g a n d e a c h r e p r e s e n t s a n d w a r r a n t s t o t h e o t h e r t h a t i t h a s b e e n r e p r e s e n t e d b y l e g a l c o u n s e l i n t h e n e g o t i a t i o n a n d d r a f t i n g o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e r u l e o f c o n s t r u c t i o n t h a t p r o v i d e s t h e a m b i g u i t i e s i n a d o c u m e n t s h a l l b e c o n s t r u e d a g a i n s t t h e d r a f t e r o f t h a t d o c u m e n t s h a l l h a v e n o a p p l i c a t i o n t o t h e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n a n d e n f o r c e m e n t o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t I n a n y a c t i o n o r p r o c e e d i n g t o i n t e r p r e t o r e n f o r c e t h i s A g r e e m e n t , t h e f i n d e r o f f a c t m a y r e f e r t o s u c h e x t r i n s i c e v i d e n c e n o t i n d i r e c t c o n f l i c t w i t h a n y s p e c i f i c p r o v i s i o n o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t t o d e t e r m i n e a n d g i v e e f f e c t t o t h e i n t e n t i o n o f t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o 4 . 1 5 S e v e r a b i l i t y E a c h p r o v i s i o n , t e r m , c o n d i t i o n , c o v e n a n t , a n d / o r r e s t r i c t i o n , i n w h o l e a n d i n p a r t , i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e c o n s i d e r e d s e v e r a b l e I n t h e e v e n t a n y p r o v i s i o n , t e r m , c o n d i t i o n , c o v e n a n t , a n d l o r r e s t r i c t i o n , i n w h o l e a n d / o r i n p a r t , i n t h i s A g r e e m e n t i s d e c l a r e d i n v a l i d , u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l , o r v o i d f o r a n y r e a s o n , s u c h p r o v i s i o n o r p a r t t h e r e o f s h a l l b e s e v e r e d f r o m t h i s A g r e e m e n t a n d s h a l l n o t a f f e c t a n y o t h e r p r o v i s i o n , t e r m , c o n d i t i o n , c o v e n a n t , a n d / o r r e s t r i c t i o n , o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t a n d t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e A g r e e m e n t s h a l l c o n t i n u e i n f u l l f o r c e a n d e f f e c t 4 . 1 6 A m e n d m e n t s A n y a m e n d m e n t s t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t m u s t b e i n w r i t i n g a n d s i g n e d b y t h e a p p r o p r i a t e a u t h o r i t i e s o f t h e A g e n c y a n d D e v e l o p e r O n b e h a l f o f t h e A g e n c y , i t s E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , a n d o n b e h a l f o f R C T C , i t s E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , s h a l l h a v e t h e a u t h o r i t y t o m a k e m i n o r a m e n d m e n t s t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , t h e a g r e e i n g t o e x t e n s i o n s o f t h e T e r m a s p r o v i d e d h e r e i n , p r o v i d e d s u c h a c t i o n s d o n o t m a t e r i a l l y c h a n g e t h e A g r e e m e n t o r m a k e a c o m m i t m e n t o f f u n d s o f t h e A g e n c y o r R C T C A l l o t h e r c h a n g e s , m o d i f i c a t i o n s , a n d a m e n d m e n t s s h a l l r e q u i r e t h e p r i o r a p p r o v a l o f t h e r e s p e c t i v e g o v e r n i n g b o a r d s o f t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C 4 . 1 7 A d m i n i s t r a t i o n F o l l o w i n g a p p r o v a l o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t b y t h e r e s p e c t i v e g o v e r n i n g b o a r d s o f t h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C , t h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r o f e a c h e n t i t y , o r h i s o r h e r d e s i g n a t e d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e T h e A g e n c y a n d R C T C s h a l l m a i n t a i n a u t h o r i t y u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t t h r o u g h t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r , o r h i s o r h e r a u t h o r i z e d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e T h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r s s h a l l h a v e t h e a u t h o r i t y t o i s s u e i n t e r p r e t a t i o n s a n d t o m a k e m i n o r a m e n d m e n t s t o t h i s A g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f t h e i r e n t i t y a s p r o v i d e d i n a n d s u b j e c t t o S e c t i o n 4 1 6 [ o f t h i s A g r e e m e n t 0 . 0 0 5 0 4 4.18 Notices, Demands and Communications Between the Parties Formal notices, demands and communications between the parties shall be given in writing and personally served or dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the parties, as designated in this Section, or telefaxed to the facsimile number listed below followed by dispatch as above described Such written notices, demands, and communications may be sent in the same manner to such other addresses as either party may from time to time designate by mail as provided in this Section Any such notice shall be deemed to have been received (i) upon the date personal service is effected, if given by personal service, (11) upon the expiration of one (1) business day, if telefaxed, or (iii) upon the expiration of three (3) business days after mailing, if given by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid If notice is to be made to the Agency Riverside Redevelopment Agency Attn Executive Director 3900 Main Street, 5th Floor Riverside, California 92522 Facsimile transmission may be made to (909) 826-5744 If notice is to be made to RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission Attn Executive Director 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, California 92501 Facsimile transmission may be made to (909) 787-7920 If notice is to be made to Developer Creative Housing Associates Attn President 9201 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 303 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Facsimile transmission may be made to (310) 859-8804 • 000505 " " J o h n C P e t r y 1 0 0 0 Q u a i l S t r e e t , # 1 6 0 N e w p o r t B e a c h , C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 6 6 0 F a c s i m i l e t r a n s m i s s i o n m a y b e m a d e t o ( 9 4 9 ) 4 7 4 - 2 1 7 7 4 . 1 9 C o m p u t a t i o n o f T i m e T h e t i m e i n w h i c h a n y a c t i s t o b e d o n e u n d e r t h i s A g r e e m e n t i s c o m p u t e d b y e x c l u d i n g t h e f i r s t d a y ( s u c h a s t h e d a y e s c r o w o p e n s ) a n d i n c l u d i n g t h e l a s t d a y , u n l e s s t h e l a s t d a y i s a h o l i d a y o r S a t u r d a y o r S u n d a y , a n d t h e n t h a t d a y i s a l s o e x c l u d e d T h e t e r m " h o l i d a y " s h a l l m e a n a l l h o l i d a y s a s s p e c i f i e d i n G o v e r n m e n t C o d e � 6 7 0 0 a n d � 6 7 0 1 I f a n y a c t i s t o b e d o n e b y a p a r t i c u l a r t i m e d u r i n g a d a y , t h a t t i m e s h a l l b e P a c i f i c S t a n d a r d Z o n e t i m e 4 . 2 0 A u t h o r i t y T h e i n d i v i d u a l s e x e c u t i n g t h i s A g r e e m e n t o n b e h a l f o f D e v e l o p e r , a n d t h e i n s t r u m e n t s r e f e r e n c e d o n b e h a l f o f D e v e l o p e r , r e p r e s e n t a n d w a r r a n t t h a t t h e y h a v e t h e l e g a l p o w e r , r i g h t a n d a c t u a l a u t h o r i t y t o b i n d D e v e l o p e r t o t h e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s h e r e o f a n d t h e r e o f 4 . 2 1 C o u n t e r p a r t O r i g i n a l s T h i s A g r e e m e n t m a y b e e x e c u t e d i n d u p l i c a t e o r i g i n a l s , e a c h o f w h i c h i s d e e m e d t o b e a n o r i g i n a l 4 2 2 E f f e c t i v e D a t e o f A g r e e m e n t T h i s A g r e e m e n t s h a l l n o t b e c o m e e f f e c t i v e u n t i l t h e d a t e ( u E f f e c t i v e D a t e " ) i t h a s b e e n f o r m a l l y a p p r o v e d b y R C T C ' s a n d t h e A g e n c y ' s g o v e r n i n g b o a r d a n d e x e c u t e d b y t h e a p p r o p r i a t e a u t h o r i t i e s o f R C T C , t h e A g e n c y a n d D e v e l o p e r 0 0 0 5 0 6 " I N W I T N E S S W H E R E O F , t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o h a v e e x e c u t e d t h i s A g r e e m e n t o n t h e d a t e a n d y e a r f i r s t - a b o v e w r i t t e n R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N B y J o h n T a v a g l i o n e , C h a i r m a n B y E r i c A . H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r A T T E S T A T I O N N a t y K o p e n h a v e r , C l e r k o f t h e B o a r d A P P R O V E D A S T O F O R M S t e v e n D e B a u n L e g a l C o u n s e l C R E A T I V E H O U S I N G A S S O C I A T E S , A C a l i f o r n i a B y M i c h a e l D i e d e n , P r e s i d e n t B y S e c r e t a r y / T r e a s u r e r 0 0 0 5 0 7 JOHN C PETRY By John C Petry, Development Partner THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE By Robert C Wales, P E, Executive Director ATTESTATION • Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM Agency Special Counsel • AGENDA ITEM 12 " R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N D A T E : J u l y 1 0 , 2 0 0 2 T O : R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n F R O M : P l a n s a n d P r o g r a m s C o m m i t t e e S t e p h a n i e W i g g i n s , P r o g r a m M a n a g e r H i d e o S u g i t a , D e p u t y E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r T H R O U G H : E r i c H a l e y , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r S U B J E C T : P R E S E N T A T I O N : S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h L i n e P r o j e c t P L A N S A N D P R O G R A M S C O M M I T T E E A N D S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N : T h i s i t e m i s f o r t h e C o m m i s s i o n t o a p p o i n t a S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h L i n e A d H o c C o m m i t t e e t h a t w i l l c o n v e n e t o p r o v i d e g u i d a n c e o n k e y p o l i c y i s s u e s r e l a t e d t o t h e u p g r a d e o f t h e L i n e , s t a t i o n l o c a t i o n s , a n d f u n d i n g i s s u e s f o r t h e e x t e n s i o n o f M e t r o l i n k c o m m u t e r r a i l s e r v i c e f r o m t h e R i v e r s i d e - D o w n t o w n S t a t i o n t o P e r r i s , w i t h a l a y o v e r f a c i l i t y i n t h e u n i n c o r p o r a t e d a r e a o f R o m o l a n d . " B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N : " I n J u n e 2 0 0 0 , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a l l o c a t e d $ 2 0 m i l l i o n o f M e a s u r e " A " t o w a r d s t h e u p g r a d e o f t h e S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h L i n e i n o r d e r t o f a c i l i t a t e a n e x t e n s i o n o f M e t r o l i n k c o m m u t e r r a i l s e r v i c e f r o m R i v e r s i d e t o P e r r i s . W e a r e c u r r e n t l y i n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l a n d a l t e r n a t i v e s a n a l y s i s p l a n n i n g s t a g e . S T V I n c , w i l l p r e s e n t a s t a t u s r e p o r t o n t h e S a n J a c i n t o B r a n c h L i n e P r o j e c t ( R i v e r s i d e t o P e r r i s ) . I n a d d i t i o n , d u r i n g t h e p l a n n i n g s t a g e o f t h e P r o j e c t , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h e f o r m a t i o n o f a n A d H o c C o m m i t t e e t o p r o v i d e g u i d a n c e o n p o l i c y i s s u e s s u r r o u n d i n g t h e i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f s e r v i c e . I t i s a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t t h e A d H o c C o m m i t t e e w i l l n e e d t o m e e t p e r i o d i c a l l y u n t i l t h e s t a r t - u p o f s e r v i c e b y F Y 0 8 . I t e m 1 2 0 0 0 5 0 9