Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout07 July 03, 1996 Budget & Finance Special Meetingofoa345 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE (COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL BARRY, BOB BUSTER, KAY CENICEROS, WILLIAM KLEINDIENST) RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 4080 LEMON STREET, 14TH FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 WEDNESDAY, JULY 3, 1996 AIWA" ►1l AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS. 4. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS/FINANCIAL ITEMS. 5A. Management Letter Comments on RTA. Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission receive and file Riverside Transit Agency's Management Letter. 5B. Rail -Volution '96 Conference, "Building Successful Communities with Rail". Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission add the Rail -Volution 96 Conference to the list of conferences for FY 96-97 and approve attendance of up to two (2) Commissioners. Page 2 Agenda - Budget/Finance Committee July 3, 1996 5C. Monthly Cost & Schedule Reports. Overview Presented are material that depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts reported by routes, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending May 31, 1996. This item is for receive and file. 6. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS. 6A. Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Program for Local Streets and Roads for FY 1997-2001. Overview The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan of how those funds are to be expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. Any subsequent additions, deletions, or substitutions to the approved Plan must also be approved by the Commission. The FY 1997-2001 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvements Plans have been submitted by sixteen agencies for Commission approval. 6B. Amendment to FY 1996-2000 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Palm Springs. Overview The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan of how those funds are to be expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. Any subsequent additions, deletions, or substitutions to the approved Plan must also be approved by the Commission. The City of Palm Springs is requesting Commission approval to amend their previously approved FY 1996-2000 Plan. 6C. Amendment to FY 1995-1999 Measure A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Palm Springs. Overview The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan of how those funds are to be expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. Any subsequent additions, deletions, or substitutions to the approved Plan must also be approved by the Commission. The City of Palm Springs is requesting Commission approval to amend their previously approved FY 1995-99 Plan. Page 3 Agenda - Budget/Finance Committee July 3, 1996 6D. Rock Fall Mitigation for Lamb Canyon Route 79 Project and Resolution of Cut Slane C-2 and other Miscellaneous Slope Clean-up Issues. Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission direct staff to: 1) Proceed with the preparation of the plans, specifications, and estimates for the rock fall mitigation effort as directed at the May 8, 1996 Commission meeting; and, 2) Modify the existing Consultant agreements with Converse Consultants, Greiner, and O'Brien Kreitzberg to assist in the preparation the plans, specifications and estimate. 6E. Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2 for O'Brien-Kreitzberq & Associates (OKA) to Perform Additional Construction Management Services for the Route 7.9 Lamb Canyon Project IRCTC Agreement No. 94-23) for Rock Fall Mitigation and Cut Slope Clean-up. Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission approve Amendment 2 to Agreement RO 94-23 with O'Brien Kreitzberg for, "Construction Management Services for Route 79 Gilman Springs Road to First Street" in the amount of $71,950 for a revised contract amount of $1,580,859 and keep $10,000 available for possible future extra work. 6F. Approval of Amendment No. 3 (Scope Change # 10) for Greiner, Inc. for Conducting Rock Mitigation and Preparing Revised Grading Plans for the Route 79 Lamb Canyon Project (Agreement No. RO 93-02). Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission approve Amendment No. 3 to the Consultant Service Agreement RO 93-02 with Greiner, Inc. for additional engineering services in the amount of $30,968,41 for a revised contract base amount of $2,905,403. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement (No. RO 93-02) and Amendments 1&2 would remain in effect including the existing $25,556 remaining in extra work. 6G. Approval of Amendment 6 to Agreement RO-9306 with Converse Consultants for Geotechnical Engineering Services for the Route 79, Gilman Springs Road to First Street Highway widening Project. Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission approve Amendment 6 to Agreement RO 93-06 for "Geotechnical Services for Route 79 Gilman Springs Road to First Street Measure A Highway Widening Project" in the amount of $17,890 for a revised contract amount of $488,141 and have $5,000 authorized for possible future extra work. 6H. Approval of Amendment No. 1 for Harris & Associates (Agreement No. RO 96-31). Overview Staff•is recommending that the Commission: 1) Authorize Amendment No. 1 to the Construction Management Service Agreement (No. RO 96-31) with Harris & Associates (HA) to cover the additional services necessary to construct the Northmoor Noise Wall Project for a period of approximately three (3) months from August 1, 1996 to October Page 4 Agenda - Budget/Finance Committee July 3, 1996 31, 1996 for an amount not -to -exceed $47,002.46. The total HA contract amount would increase from $838,789.56 to $885,792.02. There will be no change in the contingency amount associated with Amendment No. 1; and, 2) authorize that Harris & Associates (HA) use the two (2) Ford Explorers presently owned by RCTC. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement (Agreement No. RO 96-31) would remain in effect. 7. TRANSIITIRIDESHARE /PA RK..N-RIDE/BICYCLE. 7A. FY 1997 FTA Section 5307 Program of Projects. Overview Annually, the Federal Transit ,Administration distributes federal operating and capital block grant funds to urbanized areas tl irough its Section 5307 Program (formerly known as Section 9). In order for grants from these funds to be approved, the Commission must develop a Program of Projects for each area, hold a public hearing on the programs, and approve the programs. The public hearing will be held in conjunction with the July 10 Commission meeting. 7B. FY 1996-97 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Transit. Overview In order for the public transit operators to claim Local Transportation Funds (LTF) for operating and capital purposes, the Commission must allocate FY 1996-97 LTF funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the approved FY 1997 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). 7C. Request from RTA to Reprogram Local Transportation Funds. Overview The Riverside Transit Agency has identified $168,206 in excess local transportation capital funds left over from completed capital projects. They are requesting Commission's approval to reprogram these funds to new capital projects. Staff is still in the process of reviewing the request for new capital projects and, as such, will provide a final report at the Committee meeting. 7D. FY 1997 FTA Section 5311 Rural Transportation Program. Overview The Section 5311 Rural Transit Assistance Program from the Federal Transit Administration (formerly known as Section 18) provides federal operating and capital assistance funds for rural transit operators. In order for grants to be approved, the Commission must develop and approve a Program of Projects. 7E. Grant Close -Out Process for Transit Operators. Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission authorize staff to delay capital disbursements until the issue of capital grants close-out has been resolved. Page 5 Agenda - Budget/Finance Committee July 3, 1996 7F. FY 1996-97 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Recommended Funding Allocations. Overview Staff and the SB 821 Evaluation Committee are recommending that the Commission approve the recommendation of the SB 821 Evauation Committee for FY 1996-97 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program totalling $544,164 to be handed out at the meeting. 8. COMMUTER RAIL. 8A. Approval of Amendment 1 to Agreement RO 93-23 far Resolution of Request for Additional Design Fees for Huitt-Zollars' work an the Final Design of the West Corona Commuter Rail Station. Overview Staff is recommending that the Commission authorize approval of Amendment 1 to Agreement No. RO 93-23 between RCTC and Huitt-Zollars. The total contract amount would be increased by $15,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $375,724.20. This amendment will represent the final action necessary by the Commission to closeout the agreement (Agreement No. ROE 93-23) with Huitt-Zollars. 8B. RCTC Beach Trains. Overview This is a place holder for possible action regarding the RCTC sponsored trains operating between the Inland Empire and San Clemente this summer. If Commission action is unnecessary, an update on the service may be incorporated in the Metrolink Monthly Report information item. 9. ADJOURNMENT. 96-06 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE June 5, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER. Vice -Chairperson Bob Buster called the meeting of the Budget/Finance Committee to order at 1:35 p.m. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100, Riverside, California 92501. Members Present Michael Barry Bob Buster Kay Ceniceros William Kleindienst 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. M/S/C to approve the meeting minutes of May 1, 1996. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS. There were no public comments. 4. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS. There were no additions/revisions. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS/FINANCIAL ITEMS. 5A. 1995/97 Proposed Budget. M/S/C that the Commission adopt the proposed FY 1996/97 Budget. 5B. Draft Update of Measure A Strategic Plan. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Receive the Draft Update of Measure A Strategic Plan following an overview presentation by staff; 2) direct staff to forward copies of the draft document to WRCOG, CVAG, and Caltrans for their review and comment on specific items or issues, such as the revenue assumptions used to develop the draft, and identified by Commissioners at the meeting; and, continue the item to the Commission meeting in August at which adequate time should be scheduled to allow for extensive discussion of the Draft Plan and comments Page 2 Minutes - Budget/Finance Committee June 5, 1996 received from WRCOG, CVAG, Caltrans and others, in order to approve a Measure A Highway and Rail Program Strategic Plan to be used by the Commission and its staff to guide their development of future budgets, STIP proposals, and project delivery work. 5C. Corporate Affiliates Program; University of California, Riverside, College of Engineering. Center for Environmental Research and Technology. M/S/C that RCTC participate with CECERT as a Public Agency Affiliate with a one- time nonspecific purchase of full access to CECERT's ongoing research and development efforts for $25,000 making appropriate provision, therefore, within the FY 1996-97 Budget. 5D. Coalition for Clean Air Sponsorship. M/S/C that the Commission should authorize $250 to sponsor the Coalition for Clean Air General Membership meeting. 5E. Approval of Associate Membership Dues in CALCOG for FY 1996-97. M/S/C that the Commission approve associate membership dues in the California Association of Councils of Government (CALCOG) up to $4,800.00 for FY 1996-97. 5F. FY96/97 Professional Services Contract with Geographies. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, a FY96/97 professional services contract with Geographics for an amount not to exceed $329,125; and, 2) authorize the Chairperson to execute the contract on behalf of the Commission. 5G. Management Letter Comments on RTA and SunLine. M/S/C that the Commission receive and file SunLine Transit Agency's management letter and defer action on Riverside Transit Agency's management letter until final disposition by the RTA Board. 5H. Investment Report for Quarter Ending March 31, 1996. M/S/C that the Commission receive and file. 51. Quarterly Financial and Cost & Schedule Reports. M/S/C that the Commission receive and file. 6. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS. 6A. Request to Forgive Measure A Loan to City of Perris for State Route 74 (4th Streett Widening Project. M/S/C that the Commission approve forgiving Perris loan for Route 74, subject to the following: 1) RCTC should have Letters of Valuation prepared for each of the remnant parcels jointly owned by RCTC and the City of Perris, with the exception of those parcels currently developed as "pocket parks"; 2) if Perris' contribution Page 3 Minutes - Budget/Finance Committee June 5, 1996 toward loan principal is less than its equity interest in such remnant parcels, Perris should be required to relinquish its interest to RCTC as a condition of forgiving the loan; and, 3) Perris should be required to accept RCTC's equity interest in remnant parcels currently developed as "pocket parks" as a condition of forgiving the loan. 6B. Award of the Construction Contract for the Yuma Interchange Project. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve award of the construction contract to the lowest qualified bidder identified by the bid evaluation team; and, 2) establish a 10% contingency fund for the project for change order work to be exercised with the written authorization of the Executive Director. 6C. Approval of Amendment 2 to the Agreement RO-9522 with the County of Riverside to Perform Survey and Material Testing Services for the Route 79 Lamb Canyon and Gilman Springs Grade Separation Project — Correction of Total Approved Amount from May Commission Meeting. M/S/C that the Commission authorize approval of Amendment 2 to Agreement RO- 9522 to increase the total contract amount to $808,696.43. An additional $20,000 will be placed in extra work to address any final project close out needs relating to survey and material testing. A standard contract amendment will be used for this contract change. 6D. Amendment to FY 1995-96 Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for the County of Riverside. M/S/C that the Commission approve an amendment to the FY 1995-1996 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the County of Riverside as submitted. 7. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE/BICYCLE. 7A. FY 7997-2003 Short Range Transit Plan. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve the FY 1997-2003 Short Range Transit Plans for the Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside, the Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency, Riverside Transit Agency, SunLine Transit Agency, and Commuter Rail, as presented; and, 2) approve a status quo operation for the City of Rancho Mirage in FY 1997 based upon the FY 1996 approved operating level with no additional allocation of local transportation funds for the FY 1996 service year. 7B. Measure A Specialized Transit RFP Evaluation Recommendations. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve allocation of Measure A Specialized Transit funds as presented in Attachment 1; and, 2) direct the Executive Director to execute funding agreements, pending Legal Counsel review. 7C. Request from RTA to Reprogram Local Transportation Funds. Documentation for the request to reprogram Local Transportation Funds was not received and, therefore, there is no recommendation or action from the Budget/Finance Committee. This item will be presented to the Commission if backup information is received by agenda mailing time. Page 4 Minutes - Budget/Finance Committee June 5, 1996 7D. San Bernardino Associated Governments FY96/97 Commuter Assistance Program Contract. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, the SANBAG/RCTC contract to continue implementation and management of the SANBAG Commuter Assistance Program for FY96/97; 2) authorize the Chairperson to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and, 3) approve the incorporation of the SANBAG Commuter Assistance Program consultant costs in the Commission's contracts with Inland Transportation Services and Geographics in an amount not to exceed $360,249 (labor) and $12,000 (expenses) and $39,000 respectively for services to fulfill RCTC's contractual obligations to SANBAG. 7E. FY 1996/97 Measure A Commuter Assistance Buspool Subsidy Funding Continuation Requests. M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve the requests for funding under the Measure A Commuter Assistance Buspool Subsidy Policy ($25 per seat per month) totalling $1,175 per month per buspool for the period July 1, 1996, through June 30, 1997, for the Riverside to Fullerton, Riverside to El Segundo, Moreno Valley to El Segundo buspools, and one additional buspool if a request for funding support is received; and, 2) direct the Executive Director to continue to require the representative of each buspool to submit monthly ridership documentation to the Commission throughout the funded year and semi-annual written status reports regarding the operation of their individuals buspools in order to receive funding support under the Measure A Commuter Assistance Buspool Subsidy Policy. 8. SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE). 8A. Budget Augmentation tor FY 7995-96 Phase 1 Callbox Traffic Monitoring Project. M/S/C that the Commission recommend SAFE Board approval to increase the development and support portion of the FY 1995-96 callbox traffic counter contract -by $4,991.00. 8B. Proposed Phase 11- FY 1996-97 Callbox Traffic Monitoring Program. M/S/C that the RCTC/SAFE Board approve: 1) $148,930 of unallocated SAFE funds for capital and consultant support for Phase II of the Callbox Traffic Monitoring Project; and, 2) $15,000 of unallocated SAFE funds for the preparation of applications for federal funds to support Phase III of the Callbox Traffic Monitoring Project and the Regional Computer Aided Dispatch Integration Project. 8C. Funding Agreement Between Department of California Highway Patrol and Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies. M/S/C that the SAFE Board approve the Funding Agreement, subject to Legal Counsel review, between the Department of California Highway Patrol and the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies for overtime expenses necessary to support the Riverside County FSP Program in the amount not to exceed $44,774.40 for FY 1996-97. Page 5 Minutes - Budget/Finance Committee June 5, 1996 8D. Agreement with California Highway Patrol for Operation of Freeway Call Box System. M/S/C that the SAFE Board approve the agreement, subject to Legal Counsel review, with the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol, for the operation of the call box system. 8E. Amendment to Cooperative Agreement Between the State of California Department of Transportation and Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies for Freeway Service Patrol Program in Riverside County. M/S/C that the SAFE Board approve the amendment to the agreement with the State of California Department of Transportation, subject to Legal Counsel review, for the continuation of the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol Program for FY 1996-97. 9. COMMUTER RAIL. 9A. San Jacinto Branch Line Track Upgrade Study. M/S/C that the Commission amend the contract with Boyle Engineering Corporation to conduct the study necessary to improve freight service along the San Jacinto Branch Line at a cost not to exceed $200,000 including contingencies for extra work. 9B. Metrolink FY 7996-97 Budget M/S/C that the Commission receive and file. 10. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business to come before the Budget/Finance Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m. pectfully submitted, Nat Ko hav Clerk of the Commission :jw AGENDA ITEM #5A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget & Finance Committee FROM: Dean Martin, Chief Financial Officer Cathy Bechtel, Program Manager SUBJECT: Management Letter Comments on RTA Attached for your review are the management letter comments from Ernst & Young on the Riverside Transit Agency. As you will recall, at last month's Commission meeting it was decided to defer action on RTA's management letter to give an opportunity for the RTA Budget Committee to review the comments in detail. The RTA Committee met on June 17, 1996 and recommended that the following process changes be made as a result of the management letter comments: 1) An Accounting Manual will be completed to serve as a guideline for Accounting personnel. The manual will go before the RTA Budget Committee for their review. 2) The RTA Board Budget Committee will meet quarterly to review quarterly interim unaudited balance sheet date of the Agency. 3) Revenue information will be included in the RTA monthly Financial Profile report. These recommendations were presented and approved by the RTA Board of Directors at the meeting of June 26, 1996. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission receive and file Riverside Transit Agency's management letter. :jw ERNST&YOUNG LLP Ms. Susan Hafner, General Manager Riverside Transit Agency z Suite 600 3750 University Avenue P.O. Box 1270 Riverside, California 92502 a Phone: 909 276 7200 Fax: 909 787 8184 In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Riverside Transit Agency for the year ended June 30, 1995, we considered its internal control structure to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. The following suggestions, which resulted from our consideration of the internal control structure, are submitted to assist in improving procedures and controls. Year End Closing Procedures As noted in the prior year, several accounts, including retained earnings, were not properly analyzed or reconciled and required adjustments. Additionally, the funding of certificates of participation debt service payments by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and other local funding sources is a new arrangement in the transit industry and has resulted in unique accounting considerations, which required several adjustments to record properly the current year transactions. The Agency should analyze its accounts on a timely basis and record necessary closing entries prior to closing the general ledger. The Agency should also review the proper accounting procedures for the recording of debt service and related capital grant funding to ensure that these transactions are recorded properly during the year. This would benefit the Agency through improved accuracy of interim financial reporting which would provide management with more useful financial data from which to make operating and financial decisions. Management's Resvonse: The Agency has worked to record all transactions at year end before closing the general ledger. The year end adjustments, initiated mostly by the Agency, occurred from the following: (a) the unprecedented funding shortfall of some capital projects beyond the control of staff, and (b) the effect of an FTA ruling received by the Agency after the year end closing. The balance sheet accounts mentioned were analyzed and reconciled based upon preliminary information. Several accounts were subject to change directly dependent upon the decision of RCTC on reprogramming of funds and treatment of several accounting transactions. As for the debt service transactions, the account was treated based on the initial directions received from the auditors during interim procedures. The accounting for the debt transactions changed, however, when the Agency received a ruling from the Federal Transit Administration in September 1995 concerning the appropriate treatment of capital interest. Ernst & Young LLP is a member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd. ?ERNST&YOUNG LLP Page 2 Staff also recognized the importance of analyzing and reconciling all accounts before closing the general ledger. In fiscal 1996, staff has taken steps to improve the year end closing process incorporating the auditors' suggestions. Fixed Assets and Capital Grants Equity During our testing of fixed assets and capital grants equity, we noted the following matters which required adjustments to the financial statements: Accumulated depreciation per the fixed asset file listing did not agree to the accumulated depreciation per the general ledger, Certain Measure A and operator funded assets were not classified by the proper funding sources; The identified funding sources for certain capital additions were changed to other funding sources during the year without adequate explanation; Insurance proceeds received for reimbursement of damages related to two capital grant funded transit vehicles were improperly recorded as a gain on the disposal of assets; and The Agency reprogrammed Transportation Development Act grant funds from operating to capital or between projects without proper prior authorization; however, the Agency subsequently requested, and obtained, the authorization for the reprogramming of these funds. As a result of our testing of fixed assets and capital grants, we encourage the Agency to review and revise, as deemed appropriate, the policies and procedures for fixed assets and capital grants accounting. These policies and procedures should include consideration of the following: Fixed asset detail records should be reconciled to the general ledger on a timely basis, and reconciling items should be resolved in a timely manner; Advance approval for the reprogramming of operating or capital grant funds from the grantor(s) should be obtained to ensure that the desired purchases are allowable; The funding source for capital asset acquisitions should be identified at the time of purchase and properly communicated to the appropriate departments; ERNST&YOUNG LLP Page 3 Grant related asset activities should be recorded timely and properly by capital grant funding source; Appropriate general ledger accounts should be established to account for the various types of operating and capital grant funding; Any cash received for capital grant funded assets which have not been fully depreciated may require payback of a portion of the monies received to the funding agency or the application of such monies for the purchase of similar property; Additionally, such policies and procedures should be documented in a policies and procedures manual so that the Agency has written procedures to follow consistently and in the event that key personnel leave the Agency. Establishing proper communications regarding the funding and recording of capital assets would also ensure timely and reliable financial reporting of capital grants equity and related fixed asset balances. Management's Response: The Agency is looking to simplify the recording of fixed assets by having an on-line system interface into the Agency's general ledger. This system is currently being programmed in order to support the many sources of capital funding that the Agency receives. Once implemented, the enhanced integration will eliminate manual posting of entries into unlinked systems. This comment pertains to prior year balances. Prior audits have noted this difference. In fiscal 1996, the difference in the fixed assets subledger will be corrected to match the general ledger. The Agency has set up separate accounts in the general ledger for all Measure A and operator funded assets for fiscal 1996. The Agency will make every effort to identify and approve the specific funding sources prior to the purchase of any capital addition. Agency staff corrected the entries associated with the asset disposals. The ultimate result was, in either case, to return the proceeds to RCTC. The Agency acknowledges that proper approvals need to be obtained on reprogramming of local grant funds. FY 95 provided several new complexities for staff. One item was Local Transportation Funds (LTF) approved by RCTC as match to federal capital projects but never formally claimed by RTA from FY 94. To obtain the use of the FY 94 monies, staff had to go through the formal claims process in FY 95. The second item was the. FY 95 Orange Blossom Express private contribution matching fund shortfalls. This item NI ERNST&YOUNG LLP Page 4 prompted staff to request a reprogramming of the RTA carryover monies and certain capital budget line items monies of the Agency. The third and final reclass request for FY 95 formally closed out the accounting for the Agency's new annex, a multi year $525,000 LTF capital project. Staff will continue to monitor reprogramming activities and seek to obtain prior authorization when possible. The Agency has started assembling a policy and procedures manual for fixed assets and capital grants. The comprehensive manual will address all the basics as outlined by the auditors in their comrnent. Staff plans to go beyond the basics and encompass Agency specific areas within its policy and procedures manual slated to be implemented in early fiscal 1997. Self -Insurance The Agency is self -insured for workers' compensation and general liability. The Agency uses an outside administrator to provide claims management services for workers' compensation benefit claims and is a member of a public entity risk pool for general liability. An adjustment to the liability for creapage in estimated claim costs and incurred but not reported claims is recorded as a result of an analysis prepared by the auditors. We encourage management to obtain an actuarial valuation of its workers' compensation program or to prepare an analysis of its self- insurance liabilities. A semiannual analysis could be useful during management's midyear budget revision process and in identifying and reacting to positive or negative trends. Management's Response: The Agency will consider conducting an independent actuarial study of its self insurance programs if funding is approved in its fiscal 1997 budget. In the interim, Agency staff will prepare monthly reports for workers compensation and general liability that identifies problem areas and tracks historical trends by year. These reports will be distributed to the Agency's general manager and her executive team members for review and action, if deemed appropriate. Operating Grant Matching Requirements in order to obtain grant funding for the operations of the trolley project, the Agency included a match consisting of local contributions. Commitments for a portion of these contributions were not identified until after year end. The Agency should review its grant conditions on a regular basis to ensure that all requirements are met on a timely basis and that adequate funding for operations is maintained ERNST&YOUNG LLP Page 5 Management's Respn : The trolley planning consortium sought to instill community involvement by establishing a layer of private community funding supported by federal and state funding dollars. However, state funding (PVEA and AB2766) could only be used for capital purchases, leaving a void on the operating fund side. Operating funds provided through fundraisers and private donations fell short of expectations. The shortfall of private donations is beyond the direct control of staff. Staff has made every effort to collect existing private donation commitments to help ensure grant match funding requirements. Completeness of Budgets The fundamental purpose of budgetary control is to control expenses given a certain level of revenues. Budgets stimulate early study of operational issues and ensure that timely decisions are made relating to such issues. During our analysis of budgeted to actual revenues and expenses, we noted that seven revenue items relating primarily to federal operating funds and approximating $2 million were not included in the Agency's revenue detail report. The Agency should reconcile its budget reports to the current approved budget periodically to ensure that all revenue and expense amounts are properly included. Additionally, a monthly analysis of budget to actual operating results should be performed to identify and investigate unusual and significant variances. Management's Response: The budget detail was entered for both expenses and revenue. The operating expense side was double verified back to the draft numbers. The revenue budget was double verified with respect to passenger fares by line, however, certain other revenue line items that were in various stages of revision at the time of key encoding were overlooked. Staff will take steps to double verify individual revenue budget items back to draft numbers in the future. Agency staff does provide a monthly analysis of actual versus budget with variance explanation. The new software provides the Agency with on line information capabilities never before available to the Board and staff. The Board receives system generated reports and a formal written financial profile discussing the current month's financial position of the Agency. This clear, concise format is preferred by the Board as an executive summary. Agency management receives monthly departmental financials (actual vs. budget month and year to date) and individual general ledgers. Normally, this information is available by the tenth workday of the month or sooner. In addition to the above enhancements, a variety of tracking reports are available to monitor various daily activities. 1 ill ERNST &YOUNG LLP Page 6 This letter is intended solely for the information and use of management, the Board of Directors, the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the State Controller's Office, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. October 11, 1995 U 77) riA Ms. Susan Hefner, General Manager Riverside Transit Agency In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Riverside Transit Agency for the year ended June 30, 1995, we considered its internal control structure to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. The following suggestions, which resulted from .our consideration of the internal control structure, are submitted to assist in improving procedures and controls. Year End Closing Procedures As noted in the prior year, several accotmts, including retained earnings, were not properly analyzed or reconciled and required adjustments. The Agency should analyze its accounts on a timely basis and record necessary closing entries prior to closing the general ledger. This .Would benefit the Agency through improved accuracy of interim financial reporting which would provide management with more useful financial data from which to make operating and financial decisions. ona ment's Reponm Fixed Assets and Capital Grants Equity Fixed Assets andAccumulated Depreciation During our testing of fixed asters and accumulated depreciation and as noted in the prior year, accumulated depreciation per the fixed asset file listing did not agree to the accumulated depreciation per the general ledger. We recommend that the Agency review and revise, as deemed appropriate, the procedures for ensuring that accumulated depreciation per the fixed asset. file listing agrees to the general ledger. its] Grants Equity (. Substantially all of the Agency's fixed assets have been funded by federal, s C% Weal 7 capital grants. It is important that grant related sat activi ' fundedtimely. During our testing of fixed assetsand � t� arc rccardcd pr,cp�ly and following matters which required adjt�� to � grants equity, we noted the the firmnrial statements: All work -in -process assets were not classified by fimding source; Certain Measure A and operator funded assets were not classified by the proper funding sources; and The identified funding sources for certain capital additions were changed to other funding sources during the year without adequate expinriation. As the Agency obtains new sources of grant funding, it should review its general ledger accounts to ensure that appropriate accounts exist to accs operating and capital grant uric for the various types of fimding. Additionally, the Agency should review and revise, as appropriate, its procedures for the purchase and recording capital assets and the identification of the funding source to ensure that such assets are approved prior to purchase and are properly recorded by funding source. Establishhi communications regarding the $ proper timely and reliable financial reporting and �� of capita] assets would also ensure YP rting of balances. capital s equity and related fivp,t asset Dismsal of Fix d p c t We noted that insurance proceeds received for reimbursement of capital grant funded transit vehicles were improper1 damages the di d to two assets. As the related assets had not been j Y reca riled as a gain an di of grant funded assets ma Y depreciated, any cash received for capital y require payback of a portion of the monies received to the funding agency or the application of such monies for the purchase of similar ro We recommend that the Agency review and revise, P P 3' to the accouatin far � appropriate, the procedures relating g uraace and/or other proceeds received for capital grant funded fixed assets. Rtzprog ammini* of Grant Fun Is As .a result of our review of fixed assets and capital grants equity activity, Will t ;,that the Agency reprogrammed grant funds from operating to capital or betwe projects without proper prior authorization. The Agency subsequently requested, and obtained, the authorization for the reprogramming of these funds. Federal, state and local grant funds are allocated based on approved operating and capital budgets. The Agency should obtain advance approval for the reprogramming of operating or capital grant funds from the grantor(s) to ensure that the desired purchases are allowable. Policy and Procedures Manual for Fixed Assess and Cap .l Grants As a result of our testing of fixed assets and capital grants equity over the past several years, we encourage the Agency to review and revise, as deemed appropriate, the policies and procedures for fixed assets and capital grants accounting. Additionally, such policies and procedures should be documented in a policies and procedures manual so that the Agency has written procedures to follow consistently and in the event that key personnel leave the Agency. Self -Insurance The Agency is self -insured for workers' compensation and general liability. The Agency uses an outside administrator to provide claims management services for workers' compensation benefit claims and is a member of a public entity risk pool for genera! liability. An adjustment to the liability for creepage in estimated claim costs and incurred but not reported claims is recorded as a result of an analysis prepared by the auditors. We encourage management to obtain an actuarial valuation of its workers' compensation program or to prepare an analysis of its self-insurance liabilities. A semiannual analysis could be useful during management's midyear budget revision process and in identifying and reacting to positive or negative trends. Management's Reoonse; Accounting for Funding of Debt Service Related to Certificates of Participation In June 1993, the Agency received the proceeds of certificates of participation issued to finxare the acquisition of transit vehicles and obtained federal and local funding commitments for the debt service payments. This funding of debt service payments by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is a new arrangement agreed to by the FTA and has resulted in unique accounting considerations, which required several adjustments to record properly the current year transactions. Lease payments from the Agency are payable to the trustee approximatelyone to the payment of interest and principal to the certificate holds. Capin grint funds related to interest expense are earned for financial purposes as interest expense recorded. Accordingly, interest expense a is should not be cvnsidar~d an operating item as it is comparable to the recognition of depreciation expense on capital grant funded assets. Additionally, capital grant fimds related to the payment of principal are financial purposes at the time of payment by the true. Therefore, any capital funds received related to the lease payments but not earned should be rimed ay dfun c4 revenue. We recommend that the Agency review the proper accounting procedures for the recording of debt service and related transactions are recorded properly grant funding to ensure that these Properly during the year. Martagcmcntarginncrr: Operations Ctrant_Mgaghinglecluirement- In order to obtain grant funding for the operations of the trolle included a match consisting of local contributions. Co Y project, the Agency contributions were not identifieduntilafter �ttments for a portion of these conditions on a n Y� end. � Agency should review its grant thattadequate regular basis to ensure that all requirements are met on a timely basis and funding for operations is maintained. Campleteneduthwut1 The fundamental purpose of budgetary control is to control expenses given a certain level of revenues. Budgets stimulate early study of operational issues and such issues, During ensure that timely decisions are made relating to such ►-ing our analysis of budgeted to actual revenues and penes, we noted that seven revenue items relating .operating funds and approximating $2 million were not included in the Ag�en y's revenue�n detail report. The Agency should reconcile its budget reports budget periodically to ensure that all revenue and expense onto are prothe perly approved Additionally, a monthly analysis of budget Y d. performed to identify to actual operating results should be nfy and investigate unusual and significant variances. Man This letter 6\ is intended solely for the information and use of U Directors, the Riverside County T management, the -Board of Office, and the U.S. Transportation Commission, the Stale Controller's Department of Transportation. October 11, 1995 7 AGENDA ITEM #5B July 3, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO: Administrative Review Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Naty Kopenhaver, Office Services Manager SUBJECT: Rail -Volution '96 Conference, "Building Successful Communities with Rail" Staff has received an announcement from Gordon J. Linton, Administrator of Federal Transit Administration, of a national rail transit and community -building conference, "Rail -Volution '96", being held in Washington, D.C. on September 8-10, 1996. The conference will be organized around three themes or tracks, and each track will run on all three days from Sunday through Tuesday, as follows: Track 1: Track 2: Riding the Rails to Revitalized Communities, will showcase local success stories integrating community development, economic growth, and rail investments to create livable communities. Creating a Metropolitan Agenda for America, will look at examples of flexible funds and innovative financing to create a broad urban agenda of housing, economic development, and community revitalization. Track 3: Getting Everyone on Board, will focus on the importance of building local and national coalitions to leverage transit investments as a tool to create livable communities. This is being presented to the Commission as it was received after the approval of the FY 96-97 list of conferences. As with the other conferences, staff is requesting approval of attendance of up to two (2) Commissioners. There is capacity in the Conference budget and, therefore, there is no need for an amendment. It is requested that staff be notified of Commissioners' interested in attending as registrations and arrangements must be done as soon as possible. Rail -Volution '96 Conference July 3, 1996 Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Commission add the Rail -Volution 96 Conference to the list of conferences for FY 96-97 and approve attendance of up to two (2) Commissioners. nk AGENDA ITEM #5C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: William Hughes, Measure A Project Manager Louis Martin, Project Controls Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: Monthly Cost and Schedule Reports The attached material depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts reported by routes, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending May 31, 1996. Detailed supporting material for all schedules, contracts and cooperative agreements is available from Bechtel staff. STAFF RECOIIAINDATION: That the Commission receive and file. :jw Attachments F:\users\preprint\Im\costrpt.Im RCTC MEASURE A HIGHWAY/RAIL PROJECTS BUD GET REPORT BY ROUTE CO MMISSI ON PR OJECT AUTHORIZED DESCRIPTI ON ALLOCATION ROUTE 60 PROJECTS Preliminary Engrg/Environ (R 09218,9232,9303,9304,9305,9306) SUBTOTAL ROUTE 60 ROUTE 74 PROJECTS Cooperative Agreement Preliminary Engrg/Environ/Flnal Engrg (R09012, 9115) Construction & ROW (R09012) SUBTOTAL ROUTE 74 RO UTE 78 PROJECTS Preliminary Engrg/Environ. /ROW (R09111, 9116, 9301,9302, 9306,9337) Lambs Canyon Prof. (R09423,9429,9518,9522) Sanderson Project (R09011) SUBTOTAL ROUTE 79 RO UTE 86 PROJECTS Final Design (R08907) Construction & Mitigation (R09213) SUBTOTAL. ROUTE 8$ ROUTE 111 PRO JECTS (R09219, 9227,9234,9523,9525,9530,9537,9538) 9635 SUBTOTAL ROUTE. 11.1 $3,839,295 53,839,295 (4) 13,358,713 $8,183,914 $11,642,627 $8,961,366 $21,073,703 $23,115,000 $53,150,068 11,219,000 $20,115,078 (4) 121,334,079 $6,700,115 $6,700,115 C ONTRACTURAL % COM MITTED COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH. TO DATE ALL OCATION $3,411,944 13,411,944 $3,358,713 $8,183,914 111,542,527 $8,475,674 $21,073,703 $12,270,913 $41,820,290 $1,219,000 $16,182,436 (4) $17,401;436 $6,438,616 16,438,615 Page 1 of 4 88,9% 8L9% 100.0 % 100.0% 140.0% 94 .6% 100 .0 % 53.1% 78 .791 100.0% 80.4% 81.0% 96. 1% EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE A GAINST May 31,1996 TO DATE C OMMITMNTS TO DATE 10 111,460 $557,554 $669,014 $43,505 $43,645 12,839,778 $2,030,770 12,937,277 17,482,777 *10,420,054 $8,449,675 120,983,147 112,070,913 341,503,736 11,210 ,000 115,927,436 317,137,431 12,092,728 32,002,728 83.2 % 83.2% 87 .5% 91.4% 99 .7% 99.6% 98.4% 3a:al% 99 .3 % 98.4 % 32.5% 32 .5% RCTC MEASURE A HIGHWAY PROJECTS BU DGET REP ORT BY R OUTE PROJECT DESCRIPTI ON ROUTE 91 PROJECTS M agnolia to OCL (HOV) (R O 9133) City of Corona (Smith, Maple, Lincoln ;C) (2) M agnolia to Mary HOV & Serfas club Sndwls (R09101, 9308, 9415, 9524) SR71 to 1-15 (R09123,9128,9129,9130) 1-15 to 1-215 (R09131) M cKinle y Undercrossing (R09326) Van Buren Blvd. Erwy Hook Ramp SUBTOTAL ROUTE 91 1-215 PROJECTS Pre liminary Engrg/Envlron. (R09008, 9018) (4) Right -of -Way (RO 9004,9009, 9622, 9336) SUBTOTAL 1-215 INTERCHANGE IM PRO V. PROGRAM Prellm. Engrg (PSR'S) (R09107,9124-9127) (1) RT91 Interchange (Maple & Lincoln) (2) Eastrldge Overcrossing (R09132) Galena Interchange (R09014) Yuma IC Final Design (PS&E) (R09428) Y uma IC (City of Norco R09237) Yuma IC Constr. M gmt (R09631) SUBTOTAL INTERCHANGE BECHTEL PROJECT M GMT SERV. (R08900 thru R09600) SUBTOTAL BECHTEL COMMISSI ON AUTHORIZED ALLOCATION $30,982,198 $8,104,137 $10,812,508 $3,393,807 $106, 792 $1,614,951 $2,300,000 $99,011093 $6,728,504 $32,770,000 $39,496,804 $3,666,628 51, 288,240 51,500,000 173,980 11,200,000 $650,000 11,023,500 ,$9,378.848 111,389,236 111,2 88.236 CONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED CO MMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH . TO DATE ALLOCATI ON 127,055,658 17,015,976 $10,530,460 13,261,015 1108,792 11,614,951 12,300,000 549,686,912 15,878,173 $32,770,000 $38,645,173 $3,666,628 51.288,240 3900.000 173,980 11,099,975 $650,000 $890,000 $7,679,823 111,091,236 1.11,091.236 Page 2of4 87.3% 86.6% 97.4% 96 .1% 100 .0% 100.0% 99 .1% 87.4% 100.0 % 97 .9% 100.0 % 100.0 % 60.0% 100.0% 91.7% 100.0% 87.0% 91.9% 97.4% 97.4% EXPENDITURE F OR MONTH ENDED May 31, 1996 $5,222 86,222 125,692 125,692 90 171,602 :71.602 % EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST TO DATE COMMITMNTS TO DATE $26,878,754 17,015,976 $8 .336,337 $2,642,335 $108,792 $1,395,902 $5,531,855 130,705,836 $36,237,691 11,607,776 51,288,240 $73,980 11,012,067 $280,000 $4,482,083 $10,278,882 $10,279,982 99 .3 % 100 .0% 79.2% 81 .0% 100 .0 % 86.4% 80.7% 94 .1 % 93 .7% 113,1% 49 .3% 100.0% 100 0% 92 .0 % 43 .1 % 69.1% 92.7% 92.7% RCTC MEASURE A HIGHWAY PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY ROUTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROGRAM PLAN & SERVICES Program Studies (R09006,9119,9227, 9307) Corridor Studies (R09017,9110,9120) Mapping Control/QA (R09007) SUBTOTAL PROG RAM PLAN & SVCS, PARK-N-RIDE/INCENT. PROGRAM .. (R09121,9134, 9311, 9418, 9526, 9501- 9506 9514- 9517, 9526, 9528, 9601 - 9613, Impress) SUBTO$AL PARK -N RIDE COMMUTER RAIL Studles/Engineering (RO 9323, 9324, 9325, 9333, 9407, 9414, 9420, 9430) Station/Site Acq/OP Costs (R09209,9009,9221, 9416, 9417, 9424, 9510, 9521 9527, 9529, 9531, 9532, 9533, 9536, 9620, 9626, Impres s) SUBTOTAL COMMUTER RAIL COMMISSION C ONTRACTURAL AUTHORIZED COMMIT MENTS ALL OCATION TO DATE $5,275,161 $689.450 $2,683,729 $8,848,340 $6,729,966 $6,729,966 $4,864,413 $92,776,388 $87;540,861 $5,275,161 $640,467 $2,683,729 $8,599;367 $6,729,966 *6,729,986 $4,864,413 *92,548,805 $97,413,215 % C OMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR AGAINST AUTH. M ONTH ENDED ALLOCATI ON M ay 31, 1996 100 .0% 92.9 % 100.0% 99;4% 100 .0 % 100.8% 100 .0% 99 .8% 98.1% TOTALS $320,028,177 $298,960,694 82.87E NOTE: (1) Loan against Interchange Improvement programs. $36,189 $36,189 *213,525 013,528 $964,749 (2) RCTC project actual share after portion allocated to RT 91, IC Improvement Program (loan) 8 Local Streets 8 Ro ads Program . (3) RCTC portion only of Caftans Contract (4) SANBAG responsible for 25% Report does not Include Legal and Financial services or salary and fringe benefits All values are for total Project/Contract and no t related to fiscal year budgets. Page 3 of 4 EXPENDITURES TO DATE $3,201,593 $634,915 $2,636,165 $8,471',873 $5,586,842 36,686,842 34,658,084 $89,760,666 $94A111;i40 $276,432,128 % EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST COMMITMNTS TO DATE 60 .7 % 99 .1 % 98 .2% 78.3% 83 .0% 83.0% 95 .8% 97.0% HA% 13.1% S htus Mo. Ending 0J✓J1,9A RCTC MEASURE A HIGHWAY/LOCAL STREETS & ROADS PROJECTS BUDGET REPORT BY PROJECT PROJECT APPROVED DESCRIPTION C OM MITMENT CITY OF MURRIETA Loan Agreement 1-15/1-215 Interchange Improvements (R09334) SUBTOTAL MURRIETA LOAN (1) CITY OF CANYO N LAKE Final Design and Construction of RafIroad Canyon Rd Improvements (R09422) SUBTOTAL CANYON LAKE LOAN CITY OF CO RO NA Smith, Maple & Linco ln Interchanges & (1) Storm drainage structure SUBTOTAL CITY 0 NA $17,000,000 $17,000,000 $1,600,000 31,000,000 $5,212,623 56;212,823 EXPENDITURE FOR T OTAL M ONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES LOAN May 31, 1996 - TO DATE BALANCE 10 $0 TOTALS $23;812,623 50 NOTE: (1) Loan against interchange impro vement programs. All values are for total Project/Contract and not related to fiscal year budgets. Page 4 of 4 $2,379,711 ..379,T11 $1,600,000 51,600,008 $5,212,623 $6,212,023 $9,192,334 $0 3o $1,500,669 $1.600;868 $5,212,623 $U12;823 $8i713A92 % EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDIN G TO - DATE A GAINST C OM MITMENT APPROVED COMMIT . 315,859,513 **6110.613 10 $16;866,013 14.0% 14.0% 100 .0% 100.0° 100 .0% 100.0% 38 .6 % Stat us Mo. Ending 01'31,96 AGENDA ITEM #6A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Dean Martin, Chief Financial Officer Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Program for Local Streets and Roads for FY 1997-2001 The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are also required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) accompanied by documentation supporting the calculation. To date, all but five cities (Beaumont, Blythe, Moreno Valley, Perris, and San Jacinto) have submitted the required Plan, MOE certification and supporting documentation and staff request the Commission approve the following programs: Western Riverside:* Banning Calimesa Corona Hemet Lake Elsinore Norco Riverside Riverside County Temecula Coachella Vall yam* * Cathedral City Indian Wells Indio Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Palo Verde Valley: None * Canyon Lake and Murrieta are not required to submit a 5 Year Plan because of prior loan agreements with the Commission. ** Coachella, Desert Hot Springs and La Quinta do not receive Measure "A" funds because they do not participate in CVAG's TUMF program. Page 2 Staff has informed the five agencies that no disbursement of Measure "A" funds for local streets and roads will be made until all of the required documents are received and approved by the Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve the FY 1997-2001 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plans for the above mentioned agencies as submitted. :jw WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Agency: City of Banning Prepared By Kahon o Oei Date: May 7, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE' "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1996 - 1997 ITEM NO PROJECT NAMES/ LIMITS Almond Way - Hoffer to N/lndian School Lane 2. Nicolet - A lmond to Hathaway PROJECT TYPE Heater Remix & Overlay. 11 TOTAL MEASURE "A" COST FUNDS ($I,000'S) ($1,000'S) 33 33 30 30 3. 4. 5. Hathaway - Nicolet to N/Hoffer Florida - Theodore to San A ndreas Martin - Indian School Lane & Repplier 11 30 30 11 15 15 6. 7. Murray - Indian School Lane & Repplier Sydney - N/O Repplier 11 10 10 10 10 8. 9. 10. Repplier - Indian School to San Gorgonio 1 2 2 Indian School Lane - Durward & 4th St 11 15 15 11 Indian School Lane - Hargrave to Almond Way V ictor St - Indian Scho ol Lane to Almond Way 12. Jennifer Way - E/Victor 13. Lombardy - San Gorgonio to Durward 11 1 48 48 5 5 4 4 11 14. Murray St. - Summit to Lombardy 15. San Gorgo nio - Wilson to N/Summit 11 11 4 4 • 18 18 10 10 16. 11 77 77 Livingston - San Gorgonio to 6th St. 11 27 27 1 Agency: City of Banning Prepared By: Kahono Oei Date: May 7, 1996 ITEM NO RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PR OGRAM FIS CAL YEAR 1998 - 2001 PROJECT NAMES/ LIMITS PROJECT TYPE Heater Remix 1, 6th St - Livingston to Ramsey & Overlay 2. 3rd St - Livingston to George 3. Ramsey - 2nd St to 8th St TOTAL MEASURE " A" C OST FUNDS ($I,000'S) (SI,000'S)� 5 1 5 64 14. J 1st St - Livingston to Hays ' 5. J. 2nd St - Livingston to Hays 16. 1 4th St - Williams to Livingston 7. ; Christi - 6th St to 8th St 8. I Montclair - S/O Ho ffer [9. i 4th Place - Gilman to Hoffer 10. Hoffer - Phillips to Allen 11. I Theodore - Hargrav e to E/O Phillips 12. f. Phillips - Theodore to Hoffer 13. I A llen - Hoffer to George x 14. 1 Christi - Allen to W/O Cherry 15. Cherry - Hoffer to Gilman 64 53 53 15 1 15 12 12 10 10 22 22 16. 1 Florida - Wilson to Gilman 17. ' Hermosa - N/O Wilso n 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 t 10 10 it 20 5 1 1 I0 I0 20 1 5 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON COMMISSION MEASURE "A" L OCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1998 - 2001 Agency: City of Banning Prepared By: Kahono Oei Date: May 7, 1996 ITEM NO PRO.1 ECT NAMES/ LIMITS 118. George - Hargrave to Blanchard 19. Roosevelt - W/O San Gorgoni o I1 20. I Lancaster - San Gorgonio to Ripley Rd 21. I Ripley Rd - Lancaster to Pendleton 22. 1 Gilman - 11th St to West end of Road µ -� 23, King St - 1 lth St to H offer 1 24. 1 Hoffer - 8th St to K ing 25. 112th - Wilson to George = 26. 1 10th St - Nicolet to Williams 1'ROJ ECT TYPE TOTAL MEASURE "A" COST FUNDS ($1,000'S) ($1,000'S) 10 10 Heater Remix & Overlay „ 7 '_. 7 5 5 5 1 5 9 1 9 27. 1 H ays St - 8th to 12th St 28. I Jacinto View - 14th to 16th St 29. . Sims St - Williams to Nicolet 1 30. I G eorge - 16th to 20th St 11 34 1 34 „ „ ,f 31. 132. 133. 34. 18th St - George to Wilson „ 10 1 10 5 1 5 18 { 18 19th St - George to Wilson ! Sunrise - Nicolet to Wilso n 12 1 12 10 1 10 ! Ramsey - 3559 W. Ramsey to Highland Ho me (North Side) „ 20 ! 20 10 10 I0 10 „ 21 ! 21 120 120 3 Agency: City of Banning Prepared By: Kahon o Oei Date: May 7, 1996 ITEM NO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON COMMISSI ON ME ASURE " A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1998 - 2001 PROJECT NAM ES/ LIMITS 35. Ramsey - 3559 W. Ramsey to Highland H ome (South Side) 36. { Lori Way - Evelyn to Ramsey 37. 1 38. 1 Apex Ave - South of Wilson 39. Marian Way - Wilso n to Evelyn Dr 1 Evelyn Dr - Marian Way to Leslie Ct 40. i Clair Ct - North of Evelyn Dr 41. j Jana - North of Evelyn Dr PR OJECT TYPE T OTAL MEASURE "A" C OST FUNDS ($t,000'S) ($1,000'S) 120 120 4 i 4 Heater Remix & Overlay n 18 18 14 1 14 „ 42. ! Beverly Dr - Between Evelyn & Ellen Way 43. 1 Ellen Way - Between Marian Way & Bev erly Dr 44. 1 Wendy Ct - East of Marian Way 45. 46. 47. Christi - Bev erly to D awn Leslie - N/O Evelyn Dawn - Evelyn to Christi 11 II 23 5 5 10 7 3 5 23 5 5 10 48. 1 Highland Springs Rd - 5th St to Wilso n (east side) 150. 49. „ 7 3 5 5 I 5 .11 5 Linco ln - Sunset to 8th St Sunset - RR Xing to Westward 51. Cherokee - North ofJefferson erson „ 40 „ 140 f, 5 40 140 30 1 30 6 I 6 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" L OCAL FUNDS PR OGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1998 - 2001 Agency: City of Banning Prepared By: Kahono Oei Date: May 7, 1996 ITEM PR OJECT NO PROJECT NAMES/ LIMITS TYPE 52. Sioux - North of Jefferson 53. t Soboba - Mohawk to Jefferson 54. Jefferson - Sunset to Navajo II TOTAL MEASU RE "A " C OST FUNDS ($1,000'S) ($1,000'S) 6 1 6 55. Cheyenne - N/O Jefferson 56. Navajo - Lincoln to Jefferson 1 57. 1 Mohawk - Soboba to N avajo 58. I Woodland - Lincoln to Westward 59. I Westward - Sunset to 22nd 60. I 16th - Lincoln to Barbo ur 61. Barbour - 12th to 16th Street 62. 12th St - Westward to Barbour Ii Heater Remix & Overlay Ir 6 J. 6 5 i 5 II II II II 6 17 17 18 30 63. 4th St - Westward to N/O Lincoln 64. Barbour - 8th St to E/0 4th St 1I 11 p i 5. 1 13 101 31 J 31 1 18 30 5 13 11 65. € San Gorgo nio - Lincoln to S/City Limits 66. San Gorgo nio - N/Summit to North City Limits 67. Florida - Lincoln to Barbour 6S. = Hermosa - Lincoln to Barbour x µ It II II 10 7 j 7 101 101 200 I200 _ I1 1I 1 I1 5 Agency: City of Banning Prepared By: Kahono Oei Date: May 7, 1996 ITEM NO 69. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE "A" L OCAL FUNDS P ROG RAM FISCAL YEAR 1998 - 2001 PROJECT NAMES/ LIMITS Alola - Livingston to Ramsey 70. Lincoln - Florida to Hathaway 71. Westward - East of Hathaway 72. J Hibiscus - N/O Gilman x. TOTAL MEASURE "A" P ROJECT C OST FUNDS TYPE ($I,000'S) 051,000'S) 4 ! 4 60 20 11 60 20 11 6 RIVE RSIDE COUNTY TR ANSPO RTATIO N consussION MEASURE "A" LOC AL FUN DS PRO GRAM FY 1996 - 1997 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Duane Fessenden Date: June 19, 1996 Pag 1 _ of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS P ROJECT TYPE 1. 5. 8. Park Avenue - Cou nty Line Road to Ave nue K Calimesa Boulevard (east side) fro m Avenue L to County Line Road Calimesa Boulevard - Sandalwo od Drive north 300 feet I-10/Cou nty Lin e Road Interchange Upgrade 5th Street from San dalwood Drive to County Line Road Approxiranately 50 intersections in City Calimesa Bo ulevard - Intersection with Cou nty Line Road so uth to Calimesa Chan nel V arious Streets Construct C urb & Gutter, Driveway Approaches, Sidewalks and Pavement Overlay ISTE A Project to pr ovide sidewalks ,lighting and landscapi ng Grind failed pavement and resurfac e Prepare Project St udy Report - Local match Only Preliminary design f or widening 5th Street to ultimate width Street Name Sign Replacement Preliminary Design for Storm Drain Improvements (Coordinate with City of Yucaipa) Crack fill, Slurry Seal; Ov erlay as Required TOTAL COST ($000's) 80 110 10 250 6 5 5 35 ME ASURE " A" FUNDS ($000's) 65 25 10 28.8 6 5 5 35 RIVE RSIDE COU NTY T RANSP ORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE "A" L OCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1997 - 1998 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Duane Fesse nde n Date: June 19, 1996 Pag 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE Calimesa Boulevard - Intersection with County Lin e Road south to Calimesa channel Calimesa Bo ulevard/County Line Road Citywide as needed Vario us Streets Final Pla ns and Specs for Storm Drain Improvements and Intersection Widening (Coordinate with City of Yucaipa) Construct St orm Drain Facilities Street Sig n Replacement Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay as Required TOTAL COST ($000's) 40 65 3 47 MEASURE "A" FUN DS ($000's) 20 35 3 47 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSPO RTATION C OMMISSI ON MEASURE " A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1998 -1999 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Duane Fessenden Date: Ju ne 19, 1996 Pag 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. PR OJECT NAME / LIMITS Catnesa Boulevard and County Line Road, south side of intersection and west to freeway offramp West Av enu e L fro m 7th Place to 7th Street 3rd Street from Flordison to Avenue L V arious Streets PROJECT TYPE Wide n south side of i ntersection to ultimate width, upgrade traffic signal . (A joint project with City of Yucaipa) Street Impr ovements after construction of storm drain by County Fl ood Control District Construct Curb & Gutter, Driveway Approaches and Overlay Crack Fill, Slu rry Seal, Overlay, Striping, etc. TOTAL COST ($000's) 250 (Ca imen P ortion) 37 12 11 MEASURE "A" FUNDS (S000's) 30 37 12 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATIO N COMMISSIO N MEASU RE "A" L OC AL FU NDS P ROG RAM FY 1999 - 2000 Agen cy: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Duane Fessenden Date: June 19, 1996 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LI MITS Pag 1 of 1 P ROJECT TYPE I-10/Caiimesa Bou levard (Sandalwood) Interchange Upgrade Various Streets 3. Prepare Project Study Report - Local Match O nly Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay, Striping, etc. TOTAL COST ($000's) 250 50 MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000's) 28.8 50 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY T RA NSPORTATI ON COMMISSION MEASU RE "A" LOCAL FU NDS PR OGRAM FY 2000 - 2001 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Duane Fessende n Date: June 19, 1996 ITEM NO. 1. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS Variou s City Streets PROJECT TYPE Crack Fill, Slurry Seal, Overlay, Striping, etc . Pag 1 of 1 TOTAL COST (S000's) 60 MEASURE "A" FUN DS ($000'x) 60 MEASURE ITEMS Project Name end Description Li LIMPING:, FACILI fM . G.I.S. Street System: G eographical Information System (G.I.S.) for the citywide street system. G.I.S. Base Map Update: Update the existin g Geographical Information System (G .I. S. ) base map. W, AD 79-2: Mc Kirdey Interchange: Extend and widen o tframp structure. Curbs, gutters and turning lanes. Railroad Street Wideningz Engineering study. Sheridan to Sherman. Street Rehab -Hospital: Street improvements adjacent to Co ro na Community Ho spital. Dtttrdu.Ave. Imprst sn unit Provide Improvements on O ntario Ave. Root Pruning Program Roo t pruning adjacent to city sidewalks, curbs and gutters. Compttn and Ontario Realigmenti TrafEc study an d environmen tal review for Compton Ave. at Onta rio Ave. street alignment. Ptmvna Road Pavement: Level the existing street by cold planing and overlay with aspha lt pavement. Fund Project Source Fu nd No. MEAS A' h1EAS A RHEAS .• bMEASA M EASA MEAS A MEAS A A1EAS A: MEAS A 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 227 7088 7087 7294 7296 7083 7093 7301 7293 7085 Estimated Completi on Date Ongoing Ongoi ng J uly, 1996 July, 1996 December, 1996 Ju ly, 1996 Ongo ing December, 2000 September, 1996 Prior FY Approp . 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 Carry over 30,000 254,506 138,829 3,770 5,490 95,930 20,672 FY FY FY FY 10,000 2,500 5,000 2,500 Future Total FY FY Co Palisades�nv�a�[4. cast Wardlow Wash Cro ssie from east ng seen River Road to 1995 Sto rm Damage. °°ln c eAdak Resurface the existin g roadway with a heater rcmix of the ex isting asphalt concrete and insta llation of an asphalt con crete ov erlay, Ontario Avenue to fith Street, Etrb - c�ll;E end iitIthieemmituramt Replacement of deterio ra ted sidewalks, curbs and gutters. Installation of sidewalks where none exist. � d Upgrade and maintenance of striping city snide, Arttrialmduanz Widen various section s of rnnjo r arterial to match existing fo ur lanes. ' its; Phase I: Joy Street, (Grand to Parkridge), Parkridge Avenue, (Mesa to Jo y). Sheridan Street,(Blaine to W. Grand), Blackpin c Drivc,(Corona lo Pike). Corona Avenue, (Parkridge to 1.15), Viccntia A venue, (Sixth to Oliv e). Rimpau, (Quarry to Sycamore). Ford Street, (Rimpau to Kellogg). Old Mill Road, (Main to C anav an) Garretsan A venue, (Grand to Magnolia). Ontario Avenue, (Mangular to Dove). Avenida del Vista, (Yucca to Via del Rio ) CAPITA L IMPROVEMENT PROGR l - Pro'ed Cost I1 tin 200,000 460,000 CAPITAL IAIPRO '7 AIENT PROGRAM. ,f'r o ecx Cost Li stin Estimated Pri or FY o�eet Name end Descflptjon Fund Project C ompletion Source Fund No. Approp . 1996-97 ate Cat FY M ajor Pare rnrgnr Ra6aRat.a iA tionswal Brentwoo d Drive, (Border to Avenue del Vista) . Programmed STP reimbursement $284 ,000 Estimated SLTPP reimbursement $50,000 . Phase 11: Fullerton Av e. - (Grand to 300' South), Magn olia, Bo rder Ave. - (O ntario to Smith), Olive St. - (M ain to Linco ln), Pro grammed STP reimbursement $775,000_ Project No. 7076,7080, 7285 and 7295, M ain St (8th St north to Grand), STP reimbursement $90K. Auburndale Sr_ (River Road to Palo s Verde s Dr.), STP reimbursemen t $54.x. Parkridge Ave (Co rona to Cola), STP Reimbursement $60K. Citron 5t. (Linco ln to Main). STP reimbursement $9194K. E Grand Blvd. (Fullerton/North to M ain), STP reimbursemen t $325K. W Grand Blvd. (N. Ma in westerly to 6th Sr), STP reimbursement $292K. Ongoing project, Future years pro jects to be determined based on pavement management study. if'im a _,ant kftabillt r O Mueta: In accordance with 1995 Pavemen t Evalua tion elz Maintenanc e Pro gram. ileimitagtid.ritE tttettt Mafntcnart Rcsurfacc and re pair potholes and miscellane ous pavement failures. kAyenue Interchapry Off and on ramps constructed at Yuma and I-15 Freeway. Completion expected in cooperation with the City of Norco. BA tsrfre ld he rrnproveme• itt5 Resurfacing from Smith Ave to A viation Drive, and parking lot at BulterGcld Park. CITY OF CORONA FY 1996-2001 MEASVREAIT EMS Project Name and Description Circle City O1Gamp: 500 feet of new off -ramp at 1-15 (Southbound) near Circle City, connecting I-15 to El Sobrante Road no rth of Magnolia Avenue . Freeway BridgesLStith Ave Storm Droll': Reimbursement fo r construction costs of Maple, Smith and Lincoln Bridges. City cost share is from future Measure A Fu nds. LIGH TING AND SIGNALS Traffic Signal Interco nnect; Linco ln (Citro n-Rincon), Joy and Parkridge. STP Reimbu rse ment up to $250K. Traffic Signal Mo dification: Sixth & Buen a V ista, Main & G rand, Magnolia & McKinley and Lincoln & Tenth. STP Reimbursement 544K. Emergency Flasher for Fire Station No. 3: Emergency flashing lights for east and west bo und traffic on Smith Aven ue. HES grant reimbursement $46K. Traffic Signal Upgrades Various location s: Sndh, Linco ln, E. Grand and Border, (Completion expected by December, 1996). Retro fit signals with emergency vehicle preempt ion dev ices. 10 locations along 6th, Border, Lincoln and E. Grand. Traffic Sienal it d ci_t1m Co nvert tra ffic signal o peration fro m split phase to eight phase at Magnolia & Rimpau. To provide dual right turn lanes for no rthbound traff ic. Subject to RCTC approval. STP Reimburseme nt up to 532K. Fund Project Source Fund No. MEAS A NIEAS A 227 227 h 11;A S A 227 At I;AS A 227 M EAS M EAS A M EA S A 227 227 227 7096 7277 7298 7297 7303 7300 7315 Estimated Completi on Date December, 1998 Ongoing December, 1996 December, 1997 December, 1997 Ongoin g Jun e, 1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEM ENT PRO GRAM- Project Cost Listing Prior FY Approp . 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 2000-01 Future Total Carn over FY 224,876 58,051 15,441 811 100,000 565,000 40,000 FY 400,000 565,000 32,500 FY FY FY 565,000 32,500 565,000 32,500 FY Cost 1,810,000 32,500 CITY OF COR ONA FY 1996-2001 5 M traffic Su ST Modification s Subject to RCTC appro val. Storm vario us lo cations with 1 TOTAL "•�Ynr - !'r a'e cy Co s' L&thr ro act N ame and De do Fund Estimated Project Completi on Pri or FY Source Fu d No . Approp . 1996-97 �� ple Ca 1997-98 1998-99 Res/ripe >i1 1 ¢ T►c�4L9n� over 1:Y FY 1999-2000 2000-01 pc roadway so uthbound XZ1;AS FY Future Total includin fndignalead right turn 227 7312 FY $ median and signal head J une, 1997 Cost modifications a1 Ma in and 6th. 33,000 = x Reimbursement up to $2 3: . Con vcrl traffic gi gnal o phase to eight operatio n split 227 7313 phase at Magnolia June, 1997 Ei 5a hrante. Subject to RCTC a 55,000 _ •'. TP Reimbursement appro val. uptaS441C, to o provide free right for north h1ES'`A 227 and traffic and dual lefts for westbound 7311 June, 1997 lTic at Magnolia Ave and Six th. 60,0011 P Reimbursement up to $481C 1<!Ir•ASA: 227 7314 i11 ua�ic signal. June, 1997 110,000 c signal irate 227 Ju ne, 1998 rconnect. irning phasing at Sixtb and EI 5obruntc. A1G35 227 3 1lly�[9iuP June, 1998 e 30,000 Drain repair and f` t17F,3 maintenance at 6924 in the city. On going 30,000 . 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,U00 '' 150,000: MEASURE .A AI EAS A 14tEASA 141 3,565,500 3,883,750 1,890,000 1,890,000 1,690,000 1.842,500 16,741,191 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIO N MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1996 - 1997 Agency: City of Hernet Prepared by: Roland D. Trietsch Date: May , 1996 ITEM NO. 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. PR OJECT NAME/LIMITS Pavement Rehabilitatio n Project (City Wide) Surface Seal Pro gram (City wide) Stetso n Avenue Widening/Reconstruct East of Santa Fe to State Street 1997-98 Pavement Rehab (City wide) Pavement Management System Link -up to GIS Cawston Avenue/Stetson Av enue Intersection Widening State/Devonshire Intersection Widening Street Sign U pgrade, Phase II (City wide) PR OJECT TYPE Pa vement Management Pa vement Management Widening and Rehab Preliminary Soils Engineering/Survey Computer Software/Hardware Street Widening as part of Signal Installation Street Widening as part of Signal Installation Replacement of Street "Name" Signs TOTAL 1996/97 TOT AL COST ($000'S) $600 $280 $452 $ 15 $ 12 $140 $165 $ 45 Page i of MEASURE A FUNDS ($000) $250 $280 $129.5 $ 15 $ 12 $ 40 $ 40 $ 45 $811.5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRA NSPORTATIO N COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FU NDS PROGRAM FY 1997 - 1998 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Roland D. Trietsch Date: May 17, 1996 ITEM NO. 2. 3. 4. 5. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS Page Z of r PR OJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000) City -Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program City -Wide Surface Seal Program Latham Av enue Widening State to Carmalita; State/Latham Intersection Improvements Stetson Avenue Reconstruction State Street to Palm Av enue 1998/1999 Pavement Rehab Pavement Management Pavement Management Street Widening . Arterial Rec onstruction Preliminary Soils Engineering/Surveying TOTAL 1997/98 $600 $300 $110 $300 $ 15 $300 $300 $110 $150 $ 15 $875 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEAS URE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1998 - 1999 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Roland D. Trietsch Date: May 17, 1996 Page 3of.r ITEM NO. PR OJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT T YPE TOT AL C OST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000) 1. City -Wide Pav ement Rehabilitation Program Pavement Management $630 $330 2. City -Wide Su rface Seal Program Pavement Management . $330 $330 3. Chambers Avenue Widening/Palm to Lyon Street Widening - Add East B ound $120 $120 Lanes 4. Stetso n A venue R eco nstruction Arterial Reconstruction $300 $150 State Street to Palm Avenue 5. 1999/2000 Pavement Rehab Preliminary Soils Engineering/Surveying $ 18 $ 18 TOTAL 1998/99 $948 RI VERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1999 - 2000 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Roland D. Trietsch Date: May 17, 1996 Page d of 6 -- ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS P ROJECT TYPE TO TAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000) 2 3 4. 5. 6 City -Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program City -Wide Surface Seal Pro gram Sidewalk/Curb and Gutter/Street Infill (Various Locations) Stetson Avenue Reconstruction Lyon Av enue to Kirby Street FY 2000/2001 Pavement Rehab Cross Gutter City -Wide Impro vements Paveme nt Management Pa vement Management Street Construction Infill Arterial Reconstruction Preliminary Soils Engineering/Surveying Intersection Rec onstruction f or Better Ride TOTAL 1999/00 $650 $350 $180 $450 $ 20 $ 50 $350 $350 $I80 $320 $ 20 $ 50 $1,270 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORT ATIO N COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FU NDS PROGRAM FY 2000 - 2001 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Roland D. Trietsch Date: May 17, 1996 Pages of . ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS P ROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000'S) MEASURE A FUNDS ($000) 1. City -Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Pr ogram Pa vement Management $600 $290 2. City -Wide Surface Seal Program Pa vement Management $270 $270 3. Sidewalk/Curb and Gutter/Street Infill Street C onstr uction Infill $180 $180 (Various Locations) 4. Stetson Avenue Reconstruction Arterial Reconstruction $450 $300 Kirby Street to Sanderson Avenue 5. FY 2001/2002 Pavement Rehab Preliminary Soils Engineering/Surveying $ 25 $ 25 6. Cross Gu tter City -Wide Improvements Intersection Reconstruction for $ 50 $ 50 Better Ride TOTAL 2000/01 $1,115 RIVERSI DE COU NTY TR ANSPO RTATION COMMISSION ME AS URE "A" LOCAL F UN DS P ROGR AM FY 1997-2001 Agency: D ate: Item # 1. City of Lake Elsi nore May 31, 1996 Project Name/Limits Main Street/Sulphur St. 2. Casino Driv e/D iamond D r. 3. C.I.P. Pro jects/City Street Maintenance A dministrative Services: V arious Location s/ Pro jects 4. Mission Trail: D iamond Dr. - Malaga R oad 5. Lakeshore D riv e: Main St. - Country Club Blvd. (Lakepoint Park Entrance) 6. Spring Street: Graham Ave. - Collier Av enue 7. Chaney Street: Lakeshore D r. - Collier Avenue Project Type Dec ontaminati on Traffic Signal Mast -Arm Replacement Public Works/ Engineering Admin./ Construction Mgmt. (Payroll/Supplies) Street Rehabilitation Street Improvements/ Realignment Pavement Overlay/ Resurfacing Pavemen t Overlay/ R esurfacing FY 96/97 96/97 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 96/97 96/97 96/97 Total ($000's) 25 25 50 50 50 50 50 450 158 100 Measure A Funds ($000's) 25 25 50 50 50 50 50 55 32 100 96/97 100 100 8. Misc . Street Repairs/ Sl urry Seal Maint .: Various Locations 96/97 50 50 97/98 50 50 98/99 50 50 99/00 50 50 00/01 50 50 9. Misc. Street Restorati on Pa vement Rehabilitation/ 96/97 100 100 • V arious Locations Overlay 97/98 100 100 99/00 100 100 00/01 100 100 10. Curb and Sidewalk New Curb & G utter/ 96/97 30 30 R eplacement Program: Sidewalk; R&R Existing 97/98 100 100 Various Locations Sidewalk 98/99 100 100 99/00 100 100 00/01 100 100 11. Collier Av e. : Chaney St. Pavement Rehab ./ 97/98 150 150 to Cen tral St. Overlay 12. Lakeshore Drive: Terra Cotta Street Widening 97/98 250 50 Road - Dryden Street 98/99 250 200 13. Lakeshore Driv e: Jernigan Street Widening 97/98 400 80 St. - 200' East of Machado St. 99/00 400 150 14. Graham Av enue: Main St. - Landscape/Irrigation 98/99 145 20 Mohr Street 15. Su mner Av e: Main St. to Pavemen t Rehab./ 99/00 50 50 Chaney St. Overlay 00/01 400 400 TOTALS: 96/97 567 97/98 580 98/99 520 99/00 500 00/01 600 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A° LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1996 - 1997 Agency: City of No rc o Prepared by: J. Schenk Date: May 31, 1996 ITEM NO. 1. 2. Page 1 of 2 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PROJECT TYPE Under Design New Con stru ction Yuma Interchan ge Street Rehabilitation -Sixth Street Pavement Rehabilitation Sierra Avenue to California Avenue -Br on co Street -Bluff Str eet to cul-de-sac - Corral Street -Blu ff Str eet to Tr ail Stree t - Eighth Str eet -Ca lifor nia to Cre stvie w - Four th Street -Sierra to Temesca l -Bro nco-Corydo n to Bluff - Del Mar -Corydon to Kip's Kor ner Roa d - Ca liforn ia-Bucks4:in to Six th Street - Shawnee-Co rydon to Bronco Lane - Reservoir-Thir d to Hillrise Lan e Freeway Inter ch ange C onstructi on Overlay Rec onstruction Reconstructio n Ove rl ay/Pa rt Reconstructi on Overlay Ov erlay Over la y Overla y Overla y Ov er lay TOTAL COST $1,180,000 100,000 50,000 40,000 42,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 MEASURE `A ' FUNDS -K14092-$ $1,180,000 100,000 50,000 40,000 42,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1996 - 1997 Agency: City of Norc o Prepared by: J. Schenk Date: May 31, 1996 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS - Vine-Driftwoo d to Cor ydon - Corydon-River Road to 5th Street Misce llaneous Street Sea l Coa ting Street Str ipin g Miscella neous Street Overlay PROJECT TYPE Overl ay Overlay Se al Coating Striping Overlay TOTAL COST 10,000 100,000 50,000 20,000 30,000 Page 2 of 2 MEASURE 'A' FUNDS -W8949 10,000 100,000 50,000 20,000 30,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE `A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1997-1998 Agency: City of N orc o Prepa red by: J. S chenk Date: May 31, 1996 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 1. PROJECT NA ME / LIMITS Under Design New Con stru ctio n Yu ma Intercha nge 2. Stree t Rehabilitation - Rive r Roa d -Co rydon to Santa Ana River -Norc o Roa d -Fifth Street to Hamner Avenu e - Bluff-River Roa d to Looko ut Point -Trail Street -River Road to Corral Street - Str eet Str iping - Minor Street Overlay - Miscellaneous Seal Coa t PROJECT TYPE Freeway Interchange Project Re constructi on/Ove rl ay Overl ay Reco nstr uction/O verlay Reconstructio n TOTAL COST MEASURE 'A' "K78-0-64}- FUNDS- 99K)a* 190,000 61,000 150,000 38,000 100,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 $ 190,000 61,000 150,000 38,000 100,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 RIVE RSIDE COUN TY TRANSPO RTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOC AL F UNDS P ROG RAM FY 1997-2001 FY 1997 Agency: City of Riverside Pre pared By: Rick McGrath Date: May 19, 1996 ITEM N O. PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS PROJECT T YPE TOT AL COST ($1,000's) P ag e 1 of 6 MEASURE "A" F UNDS ($1,000's) 1 California Avenue Extension - Van Bure n Blvd. to Collett Ave. 2. Va n Buren Blvd M agnolia to 91 3. 91 Fre eway/Van Buren Blvd. Inte rc hange 4. 91 Freewa y/V an Hookramp W idening - Freewa y Stre et Extension $ 3,350 Str eet Wid ening $ 6,000 Repl ace/Widen $ 14,000 Bure n Blvd. Offramp R ealignment $ 5. Blaine & W atkins 6. Arlington Ave. Underpass 7. ATSF RR 8. ATSF RR 9. ATSF RR 10. ATSF RR 11. ATSF RR Cross ing @ Blaine St. Crossing @ Spruce St. Crossing @ Columbia Ave . Crossing @ Iowa Ave. Crossing @ Palmyr ita Ave . Traffic Signal&RR $ 400 Street Underpa ss $ 12,000 Signals/St. R eh ab $ 1,000 11 $ 900 $ 900 $ 900 $ 1,000 $ 350 $ 50 800 $ 250 $ 75 $ 2,300 $ 150 $ 110 $ 120 $ 110 $ 100 1,000 Agency: City of River side Prepared By: Ri ck McGrath Date : May 19, 1996 ITEM PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS NO. RIVE RSI DE COU NTY T RANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUN DS P ROGRA M FY 1997-2001 FY 1997 PROJECT TYPE Pag e 2 of 6 MEASURE "A" TOTAL COST FUNDS ($1,000' s) ($1,000' s) 12. Iowa Widening -Marlb orough to 600 N. " $ $ 100 13. Monroe/Magnlia Intersect. Widen $ 225 $ 225 14. CADM E Stee t Plan Conversion Dat a Conversion $ 250 $ 25 15. 14th St. , Kansas to Sedgwick St. Wid ening $ 900 $ 900 16. Tyler - W ells Traff. Sig. Modif . $ 90 $ 90 17. Brockton - 14th $ 60 $ 60 18. Indiana - Harrison " $ 100 $ 100 19. Palm - Bandini $ 40 $ 40 20. Van Buren - Linc oln II$ 50 $ 50 21. Mo nroe - Magnolia fr$ 60 $ 60 Sub Total $ 45,025 $ 6,265 RIVERSI DE COUN TY TRA NSPORTATION COM MISSION MEAS URE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1997-2001 FY 1998 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared By: Ri ck McGrath Da te: Ma y 19, 1996 ITEM PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS N O. PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($1,000' s) Pag e 3 of 6 MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($1,000's) 1. Arlington A venue Und erpa ss e A .T. & S.F. Crossing 2. V an Buren Blvd. Widening Magnolia to 91 Free wa y 3. 91 Free way/V an Bure n Blvd. Inte rc hange Street Underpa ss $ 12,000 Street Wid ening $ 6,000 R eplace/ Widen $ 14,000 Sub -Total $ 32,000 $ 1,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,000 $ 6,000 Agenc y: City of Riv erside Prepared By: Rick M cGrath Date: May 19, 1996 ITEM PROJECT NA MES/LIMITS NO. RIVERSIDE CO UN TY TR ANSPO RTATION CO MMISSIO N ME ASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS P ROGRAM FY 1997-2001 FY 1999 PROJECT TYPE Pag e 4 of 6 MEASURE " A" TOT AL COST FUNDS ($1,000' s) ($1,000' s) 1. Ma jor Street Rehabilit ation Street Resurfacing $ 2,200 $ 1,000 2. Tyler Stree t W idening - Stre et Widening $ 1,100 We lls to Eureka $ 1,100 3. Jurupa Ave. Extension - Street Ext ension $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Van Bure n Blvd. to Crest Ave. Sub -Total $ 5,300 $ 4,100 A ge ncy: City of River side Pre pared By: Rick M cGrath Da te: May 19, 1996 ITEM N O. PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS RIVERSIDE CO UNTY TRA NSPORTATION COMMISSION MEAS URE "A" LOCAL F UNDS PROGRAM FY 1997-2001 FY 2000 PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($1,000' s) Page 5 of 6 MEASURE "A" FU NDS ($1,000's) 1. Central Avenue V an Buren to Adams 2. Tra ffic Signal Improvements 3. Tyle r Street - W ells to A rlington 4. Major Street Re habilitation St reet Widening Traffi c Signals Street Widening 900 150 $ 3,800 Str eet Resurfa cing $ Sub -Total $ 900 $ 150 $ 2,600 2,200 $ 1,000 7,050 $ 4,650 Age ncy: City of Riversid e Pre pared By: Rick McGrath Date : May 19, 1996 ITEM PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS NO. RI VERSIDE CO UN TY TRANSPO RTATION COM MISSION ME ASURE "A " LOCA L FUNDS P ROG RAM FY 1997-2001 FY 2001 PROJECT TYPE Page 6 of 6 ME AS URE "A" TOTAL COST FUNDS ($1,000' s) ($1,000' s) 1. Traffic Signal Improvem ents Traffi c Signals $ 150 $ 150 2. 91 Freeway/La Sierra Ave . Replac e/ Widen $ 14,000 Interchange $ 2,500 3. Major Stre et Re habilitation Street Resurf acing $ 2,200 $ 2,200 4. SPRR Cros sing @ Ma rlborough RR -Xing $ 1,000 $ 120 5. SPR R Crossing @ Rustin RR - Xing $ 1,000 $ 100 Sub - Total $ 18,350 $ 5,070 TOTAL $ 78,925 $ 26,085 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 1 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) 08th Ave SH95 to Ely 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS Fund Source Total 302 other Total 18th Ave Intake Blvd 1.00 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS to C&D Blvd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 302 other Total Fund Source Amount x s1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 51000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 j 98/99 1 99/00 j 00/01 152 D 0 0 1 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 150 0, 0 152 127 0 127 24th Ave SH78 to Buck Blvd 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS 55th Ave Calhoun St to Coachella CL 0.50 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 22' RMS Coordinate with City of Coachella for part of the project. 66th Ave Jackson St to Van Buren Blvd 0.87 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen & resurf 26',0.21'RMS 69th Ave Costa Mesa Dr to Vander Veer Way 0.25 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 20 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 20' RMS 84th Ave Rte 80 to Johnson St 0.80 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurface.0.21', 24' RMS 302 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 202 0 202 34 14 48 152 0 152 302 Measure A/Palo Verde D 1 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 125 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 200 302 Measure A/Palo Verde D E R C 1 0 0 0 2 0 30 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 150 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 19 D' 0 E 0 R 0 0 C, 0 19 73 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 17 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 70 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 2 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Admiralty Way Vander Veer Rd to Wly 0.25 0.25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS Airport Blvd Jackson St to SH 86 2.00 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 36 A/C Coordinate with City of Coachella for 1/3 of the project cost. SB 300 cycle 8 Airport Blvd 1.50 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 38' A/C Coordinate with City of La Ouinta for 15% of project Albatross Way Vander Veer Rd 0.24 (mi) Resurface 0.21', 24' RMS Alberta Ave Swingle Ave to Wly 0.15 mi 0.15 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Algonquin Pl Chiricahua Dr to Desert Moon Dr 0.23 (mi) 31 (ft)/ 31 (ft) Resurf 31',0.21'AC Petromat SB 300 cycle 7 Ana Maria St Carmen Ave to Bonita Ave 0.25 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, Resurf 26',0.21'RMS Fund Source Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 33 0 33 207 89 296 193 35 228 23 0 23 21 0 21 38 0 38 34 0 34 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 197/98 98/99 199/00 j 00/01 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 30 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 2 1 0 203 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 189 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 20 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 18 D E R C 2 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 3 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Antelope Rd Ellis Ave to Watson Rd 1.52 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen & Reconstruct 26', 0.21' RMS, 0.5' AB Arapahoe Vista Elkhorn Tr to Ely 0.06 (mi) 18 (ft)/ 18 (ft) Recon 18' 0.21'AC, 0.5'AB Desert Tortoise and Fringe Toed Lizard SB 300 cycle 7 Armstrong Rd 34th Street 0.50 (mi) Widen, Recon to Sierra Ave 36 (ft)/ 64 (ft) Arrowhead Blvd 18th Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS to 20th Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Avenida Atezada Camino Silvoso to Camino Idilo 0.25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon 35',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Desert Tortoise Area Avenida Gracia Camino ldilio to Nly 0.20 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Recon 36',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 302 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total Avenida Miravilla Avenida San Timoteo to 1.50 mi Nly 1.50 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf 24.' 0.17AC W/AC dike 300 other Total 252 0 252 18 0 18 476 0 476 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 + 97/98 198/99 99/00 j 00/01 D E R C 0' 1 0 1 0 0 0 250 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D o 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 152 D' 0 E 0 R 0 0 C 0 152 52 0 52 42 0 42 129 0 129 80 10 0 0 0 0 0 386 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 150 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 40 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 0 126 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 4 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Avenida Mirola Camino Silvoso to Camino Idilo 0.25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon 35',O.5'DG,0.21'RMS Desert Tortoise Area Avenida Rambla Camino Silvoso to Camino Aventura 0.50 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon 35',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Desert Tortoise Area Bell Ln 14th Ave 0.31 (mi) Resurf 26', 0.17' AC SB 300 Cycle 7. to Sly 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Blackfoot Dr Elkhorne Tr to Warner Tr 0.17 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon 35', 0.21'AC, 0.5'AB Desert Tortoise and Fringe Toed Lizard area SB 300 cycle 7 Bonham St Clark St to Carroll St 0.25 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS W/Berms Bounty Ave Vander Veer Rd to Windward Dr 0.51 (mi) 29 (ft)/ 29 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 29' RMS Road width varies from 20' to 40' Briggs Rd Gunther Rd to Mapes 1.01 Cmi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/berms Pursue dedication of R/W Fund Source Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 302 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 52 0 52 102 0 102 31 0 31 87 0 87 42 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 197/98 1 98/99 + 99/00 1 00/01 D E R C 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 E R C 2 1 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley Df 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 1 R 0 0 C 40 42 53 0 53 551 0 551 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 50 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 370 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 .0 170 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 5 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Brookside Ave Cherry Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf 30',0.17'AC to Highland Springs Ave 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Cajatco Rd Various intersections 0.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Widen and resurf 750' ELy/Wly for turn pockets Intersections a Kirkpatrick, Archer. Cajalco Rd Seaton Ave to Clark St 1.50 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Widen and recon 40', 0.5'AB, 0.25'AC Cajalco Rd Various intersections 0.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Widen and resurf 750' Ely/Wly for turn pockets Intersections 2 La Sierra and Lake Mathews. Cambridge Ave 42nd Ave to Jamaica Sands Dr 0.31 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf 35',0.21'AC W/Petromat SB 300 cycle 7. Camino Aventura Avenida Descanso to Bubbling Wells 0.75 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Reconstruct 0.50'AB, 0.21'AC Camino Idilio Avenida Gracia to Bubbling Wells Rd 0.30 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon 35',.0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 98/99 j 99/00 l 00/01 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other TotaL 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 108 0 108 130 0 130 249 610 859 130 0 130 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 105 0 0 0 0 E R C —1 D 10 20 0 0 o 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 E R C 110 15 0 0 0 0 0 124 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 50 D 2 E 1 R 0 0 C 47 50 49 221 - 270 67 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 10 10 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 55 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name • Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 6 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Carmen Ave Broadway to Almond St 0.50 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, resurf 0.21'RMS Case St Hayes Ave to Grand Ave 0.30 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Catt Rd Palomar to NEIy 0.25 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Grade 40' w/berms Cherry Valley Blvd Edgar Canyon Channel 0.01 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Construct Box Culvert Construct box culvert w/headwalls & wingwalls, riprap streambed 8 slopes a minimum of 200' upstream & downstream. Cherry Valley Blvd Calimesa CL to Beaumont Ave 3.00 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Resurface 38', 0.21' AC Do not construct until electrical is underground Cherry Valley Blvd Noble Creek Storm Chnl 0.01 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Construct Box Culvert Construct box culvert w/headwalls 8 wingwalls riprap the streambed 8 slopes for a mininum 200' upstream & downstream Churchill St Hayes Ave to Nly 0.46 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other TotaL Fund Source Amount x 51000 62 0 62 102 0 102 52 0 52 403 0 403 79 386 465 451 0 451 127 0 127 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 98/99 J 99/00 1 00/01 0 0 0 1 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0, 0 60 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 100 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 50 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 52 20 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 331 0 D 5 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 74 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 60 20 0 0 0 0 0 371 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 125 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 7 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Clinton St Miles Ave to Sly to CL 0.25 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 56' RMS Coordinate with City of Indio for 1/2 of project. Cole Ave Nandina Ave to Lurin Ave 0.75 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Const 28', 1.0'DG, 0.25'RMS Fund Source Total 301 other Total 300 other Total .Compass Dr 72nd Ave to Windlass Dr 0.16 (mi) 33 (ft)/ 33 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 33' RMS Coral Reef Rd Vander Veer Rd to Seaview Way 0.57 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 24' RMS Corydon St Grand Ave to Mission Tr 1.56 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf 32',0.17'AC Proposed Federal Funds. 1/2 in the City of Lake Elsinore. Pursue coop w/City. Funds represent full width improvements. 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 51000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 26 22 48 78 0 78 20 0 20 50 0 50 45 202 247 Costa Mesa Dr 68th Ave to 70th Ave 1.00 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 40' RMS Country Club Dr Portola Ave to Wly 0.65 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf west bound lane, 0.21'AC w/petromat South half of road in the city of Palm Desert Pursue coop w/City. SB 300 Cycle 7. 301 other Total 301 other Total 140 0 140 111 0 111 96/97 1 97/98 198/99 99/00 00/01 D E R C 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 22 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 75 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 18 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 47 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 E 10 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 26 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 E R C 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 137 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 10 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 8 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Country Club Dr SH243 to Lake Ln 0.40 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf 24',0.17'AC Cutter Way Bounty Way to Beachcomber Way 0.17 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS Dakota Tr Miles Ave to Arophoe Vista 0.31 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Recon 35', 0.21'AC, 0.5'AB Env concerns: Desert Tortoise area, Fringe Toed Lizard and Whitewater River. SB 300 Cycle 7. De Portota Rd Anza Rd 2.00 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC De Portola Rd Pauba Rd to Glen Oaks Rd 4.12 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon and elevate road 0.50'AB, 0.21'AC' to Pauba Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Deer Foot Ln Double View Dr Sly 0.20 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC Delano Dr Toll Gate Rd 0.27 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) to Nly 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Fund iFund Source Source Amount x $1000 Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 37 0 37 23 0 23 95 0 95 203 0 203 1340 0 1340 20 0 20 26 0 26 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 Design R = Right of Way Acquisition = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 J 97/98 J 98/99 J 99/00 00/01 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 2 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 95 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 E R C 2 1 0 200 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 120' 0 20 0 0 0 0, 1200 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2 1 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2 1 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 9 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Dillon Rd 48th Ave to SR 86 0.67 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS Dolphin Dr Vander Veer Rd to Sea View Way 0.50 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS Fund Source Fund Source Amount x 51000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 51000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction Total 301 other Total 301 other• Total Double Tree Dr Silver Fir Dr 0.20 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 7 to Jeffery Pine Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Double View Dr Middle Ridge Dr SWIy 1.66 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Dowman St Broomall Ave to Grand Ave 0.23 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Dutton Street Jonathan Ave 0.04 (mi) Reconstruct 32' to 200' East 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Ebb Dr Schoal Dr to Rocky Point Dr 0.12 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 96/97 ` 97/98 1 98/99 1 99/00 1 00/01 81 0 81 54 0 54 48 0 48 D E R C 0 0 0 0 o 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 51 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 0 143 77 0 77 34 0 34 14 0 14 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1 0 140 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 E R C 1 2 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 10 May 30, 199f El Cerrito Rd 1-15 to Chase Dr 0.40 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Improve Channel sides Redefine and riprap channel along road. EW (ft)/PW (ft) Ethers Blva 10th Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS to Riverside Dr 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Ellis Ave Theda St to Post Rd 1.09 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Estate Dr Toll Gate Rd 0.12 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC to Meadow Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Flamingo Dr Vander Veer Rd to Harbor 0.43 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 40' RMS Fore Dr New Chicago Ave NEIy 0.17 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'AC SB 300 cycle 7 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Four Chimneys Rd Delano Dr 0.10 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 to Wly 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Fund Fund Source Source Amount x $1000 Total 300 other Total 302 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 J 97/98 f 98/99 1 99/00 1 00/01 65 D 0 E 0 R 0 0 C 0 65 142 0 142 252 0 252 13 0 13 58 0 58 25 0 25 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 25 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 140 302 Measure A/Palo Verde a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 1 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 lc 0 0 250 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 55 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 2 1 0 22 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 11 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Fred Waring Dr Indio City Limits to Clinton St 0.26 (mi) 52 (ft)/ 52 (ft) Resurf 53', 0.25' AC Verify Overlay Thickness Prior Construction Coordinate with City of Indio. Only RCTD $ shown Frontage Rd Surfas Club Dr to Corona CL 0.46 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Recon 32',0.21'AC May need R/W, existing R/W is 55' Gilman Springs Rd Route 60 to Route 79 9.30 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Recon, realign Additional funding for Gilman Spgs Rd is shown in Supv.Dist 5 proj. A2-0434. For record keeping charge all time to proj.# A2-0433. Gilman Springs Rd Route 60 to Bridge St 4.90 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Recon, Realign Additional funding for Gilman Spgd Rd is shown in Supv.Dist 3 proj. A2-0433. For record keeping charge all time to A2-0433. Granda Way Costa Mesa Dr to Beach Comber Way 0.16 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS Green Ave Old State Highway to Sly 0.49 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/Berms R/W and Environmental need more research Grove St Cherry St to White St 0.25 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'AB Fund Source TotaL 301 other Total 300 other. Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 51000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 15 84 99 184 0 184 96/97 J 97/98 1 98/99 99/00 100/01 0 E R C 2 1 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 332 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 21 0 0 1419 C 195 58 58 1751 568 2737 3305 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 44 0 0 C 290 117 117 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 D 0 E 0 R 0 0 C 0 22 77 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 20 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 E R 0 75 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 2 R 0 0 10 0 C 0 0 0 53 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 12 May 30, 199( • EW (ft)/PW (ft) Hall Ave Walters to Chandler 0.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Construct 4 - 60" pipes Hansen Ave Nuevo Rd to Montgomery 0.52 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Consz 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Hansen Ave 10th St to Montgomery Ave 1.00 (mi). 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/berms Heien Ave Clinton Ave to Wly 0.4 mi 0.40 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS Hili St Mitchell Rd to 1.30 Mi Nly 1.30 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS ]dyllarook Dr Canyon Dr 0.69 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 idyllmonr Rd Apela Dr 0.38 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 to NEIy 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) to SWIy 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x S1000 168 0 168 82 0 82 203 0 203 50 0 50 322 0 322 61 0 61 35 0 35 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Envirormenta C = Construction 96/97 97/98 198199 ! 99/00 # 00/01 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 16 0 20 0 25 0 107 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 200 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 47 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1 1 20 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 D E R C 01 2 0 1 0 0 0, 58 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 32 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL TEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 13 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Ironwood Ave Theodore Ave 1.37 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS to 1.37 mi Ely 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Fund Source Total 300 other Total Jean St Carroll St to Day St 0.26 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26', 0.5 DG,0.21'RMS•W/Berms Juniper Flats Rd Juniper Springs to Sly 1.61 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS W/Berms Katy Way EL Cerrito Rd to Sly 0.35 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Research alternate solutions Coordinate w/Flood Control 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Killen Tr 3 locations 0.25 (mi) Slope stabilization 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft) La Casa Way Schooner Way to Cutter Way 0.11 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS Lake Mathews Dr Gavilan Rd to Wly 1.25 Mi. 1.25 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.34'AC on 0.72'AB 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 15 Fund Source Amount x s1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction . 96/97 J 97/98 J 98/99 + 99/00 1 00/01 132 D 1 E 1 R 0 0 C 130 132 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western o D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 D 0 1 0 0 42 202 0 202 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 C 0 40 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 C 200 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 82 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 82 300 Measure A/Western 90 D 9 0 0 E 2 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 79 0 0 90 300 Measure A/Western 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 D 0 0 0 1 E 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 13 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 550 D 0 48 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 176 0 C 0 0 0 550 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 325 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 14 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Lake Mathews Dr 1.25 Mi Wly Gavilan Rd to 2.25 Mi Wly Gavilan Rd 1.00 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26' 0.34'AC on 0.72'AB Lakeside Ct Fairway Rd to Nly 0.07 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurf 35',0.21'AC Petromat Lakeview Ave Ramona Expressway 3.05 (mi) Resurf 30', 0.25' AC to Nuevo Rd 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Verify overlay thickness prior to construction Lane St Carroll St to Day St 0.26 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26', 0.5'DG, 0.21'RMS W/Berms Limonite Ave Etiwanda Ave to I-15 1.25 (mi) 45 (ft)/ 45 (ft) Resurf 0.21'AC, grind Exist R/W is 85-160 ft. Potential Mira Loma RBBD project Los Alamos Rd SH79 to Warm Springs Creek 1.28 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Los Caballos Pauba Ave to SH79 1.34 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Fund Source Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 347 0 347 18 0 18 536 0 536 42 0 42 184 0 184 152 0 152 202 0 202 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Tear Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 198/99 + 99/00 j 00/01 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 321 0 1 0 0 0 0 314 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 15 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 533 0 0 0 0 D E R C E R C 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 40 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 180 0 E R C D E R C 1 1 0 150 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 200 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 15 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Lovekin (South) 23rd Ave 2.00 (mi) Resurf 32',0.21'AC to 28th Ave 26 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Malaga RC Mission Tr 0.35 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC to Ely 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Mapes Rd Menifee Rd to Antelope Rd 0.99 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Markham St Day St to Seaton St 1.02 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Widen and recon 32', 1.0'AB, 0.25 RMS, grade 40' Marshall SH74 0.00 (mi) Install Cross Gutter 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft) Fund Source TotaL 302 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design 'R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 68 366 434 35 0 35 202 0 202 190 0 190 50 0 50 Mauna Loa Dr Mojave Nly 0.31 (mi) Recon 32',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) McAllister St Riverside CL 1.00 (mi) Realign and recon to Sly 26 (ft)/ 30 (ft) 301 other Total 300 other Total 78 0 78 210 0 210 96/97 J 97/98 98/99 99/00 1 00/01 D E R C 15 5 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 2 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 32 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 1 1 0 200 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 187 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 50 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 75 a E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 60 50 0 0 0 0 100 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 16 May 30, 199E McWade Ave Ritter Ave to Olson Ave 0.24 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG, 0.21'RMS w/berms EW (ft)/PW (ft) Fund Source Total Meadow Dr Idyllbrook Dr 0.15 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 to Estate Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Meadow Glen Dr Double Glen Dr 0.34 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 Middle Ridge Dr ldyllmont Rd 1.07 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 to Idyllbrook Dr 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) to Mc Mahon Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Miles Ave Indio City Limits to Clinton St 0.05 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf 32', 0.25'AC Verify Overlay Thickness Prior to Construction Coordinate with City of Indio. Only RCTD $ shown Mission Blvd SH60 1.80 (mi) Resurf 0.25'AC to Milliken 64 (ft)/ 64 (ft) Mission Blvd SH 60 to Pedley Rd 1.96 (mi) 57 (ft)/ 57 (ft) Resurf 0.25'AC W/Petromat 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 133 0 133 16 0 16 32 0 32 93 0 93 12 64 76 129 538 667 160 514 674 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 J 97/98 + 98/99 99/00 100/01 D E R C 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 30 0 0 100 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 29 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 90 300 Measure A/Western D' 2 E 1 R 0 C 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/CoacheLla Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 109 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E C 50 5 0 0 0 0 0 105 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 17 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Fund Source Total Monte Vista Dr Baxter Rd 1.23 (mi) Resurf 28',0.21'AC to Bundy Canyon Rd 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) 300 other Total Neignoaurs Blvd 36th Ave 1.00 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'RMS to 38th Ave 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 302 other Total Orange St Reservoir Ave to Lakeview Ave 0.22 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/Berms Palomar St Clinton Kieth to Central 1.60 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurface 26', 0.21' AC Segment is planned for improvement by RBBD in future years. SB 300 cycle 7 Par Dr Thornhill Dr to Olympia Way 0.26 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf 32',0.21' AC Petromat Pico Ave Nuevo Rd to San Jacinto Ave 1.00 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Pine Crest Ave SH243 to 0.72 Mi SWIy 0.72 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf 24',0.17AC SB 300 cycle 8 .300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design • R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 98/99 1 99/00 1 00/01 174 0 174 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 170 202 0 202 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 Measure A/Palo Verde 0 200 0 0 0 0 42 0 42 143 0 143 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 3 0 1 0 0 0 139 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 D a E 0 R 0 0 C 0 38 114 0 114 64 0 64 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 1 0 36 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1 1 12 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 1 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 61 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits • Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 18 May 30, 199( EW (ft)/PW (ft) Pleasant View Dr Vander Veer Rd to Sea View Way 0.58 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurface_0.21',-24' RMS Polk St SH 86 to 72nd St 0.98 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen 8 Resurf 26', 0.25' RMS Port Cir Barnacle Dr to Wly 0.1 mi 0.10 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 30 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 30' RMS Post Rd Santa Rosa Rd to Nly 0.50 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS W/Berms Post Rd Ellis Ave to Santa Rosa Rd 0.46 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Putters Ln New Chicago Ave to Fore Ln 0.08 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'AC petromat SB 300 cycle 7 Rafael St Carmen Ave to Bonita Ave 0.25 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, resurf 26',0.21'RMS Fund Source Total. 301 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 50 0 50 106 0 106 12 0 12 107 0 107 102 0 102 12 0 12 47 0 47 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 J 97/98 J 98/99 99/00 j 00/01 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 E 0 0 2 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 102 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 D E R C 0 0 0 0 1 1 25 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 E R C 2 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1 1 15 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 19 May 30, 1996 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Ramona Expy Lakeview Av 1.30 (mi) Resurface AC to 5th St 27 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Ramona Expy 0.1 mi Ely Pico Av to Lakeview Av 2.70 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Reconstruct 28', 1.0'AB 8 0.45'AC road Reche Cyn Rd Reche Vista Dr to San Bernadin❑ Co Line 3.60 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',AC and improve drainage probLems Coop project w/Flood Control. Redlands Blvd San Timoteo Cyn 1.20 (mi) Resurf 0.17AC SB 300 cycle 8 to Moreno Valley CL 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Reed Valley Rd CenteniaL t❑ Mustang Ln 1.50 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Grade 36', base 28' 0.5'DG, const 26' RMS Pursue dedication of R/W by property owners R/W may cost $200,000 if not dedicated Reservoir Ave 9th $t to Lakeview Ave 0.37 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Possible development in the area Rider St Clark St to Ely 0.45 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26', 0.50 DG, 0.25'RMS Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 61000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x 51000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 1 98/99 1 99/00 1 00/01 65 393 458 D E R C 15 5 0 45 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 1800 D 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 1800 300 Measure A/Western 1300 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 1300 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 18 0 1778 285 0 15 0 0 0 0 1000 121 D 0 2 0 E 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 118 0 121 300 Measure A/Western 230 0 0 0 0 E 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 230 0 0 230 300 Measure A/Western 47 D 1 0 0 E 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 45 0 0 47 300 Measure A/Western 81 0 0 1 0 E 0 10 0 R 0 0 0 0 C 0 70 0 81 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 20 May 30, 199E EW (ft)/PW (ft) Riverside County Playground Rd SH243 to Park Entrance 0.57 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurf 24',0.17'AC Rocky Point Dr Club View Dr to Ebb Dr 0.36 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS Russel Ave Hibiscus Ave to Gentian Ave 0.31 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.60'DG Sage Rd Red Mountain Rd to 1.36 mi Nly 1.36 (mi) 20 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen, Recon 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS w/Berms San Jacinto St Hemet CL to Stetson 1.00 (mi) 38 (ft)/ 38 (ft) Resurf 0.21'AC w/petromat, grind Partial width in the City of Hemet Pursue Coop with City of Hemet San Marcos Pl Pleasant St to San Felipe Dr 0.21 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'AC petromat SB 300 cycle 7 San Marino Ln San Marcos PL to End Sly 0.11 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'AC petromat SB 300 cycle 7 applied for Fund Source Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 51 0 51 46 0 46 84 0 84 295 0 295 19 123 142 27 0 27 16 0 16 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 J 98/99 99/00 00/01 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 48 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 2 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 43 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley D E R C 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 25 20 0 0 0 0 0 250 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 2 0 0 0 E 0 2 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 15 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 E R C 2 1 0 24 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 13 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 21 May 30, 1996 Name Limits • Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) San Mateo Way San Marino Ln to San Felipe Dr 0.17 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'AC petromat SB 300 cycle 7 San Miguel Way New Chicago Ave to San Marcos Pl 0.15 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 26',0.21'AC petromat SB 300 cycle 7 Schooner Way La Casa Wy 0.20 (mi) Resurface to 69th Ave 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Scott Rd Briggs Rd 2.10 (mi) Resurf 26', 0.25' RMS to 1.1 mi west of SH 79 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Verify overlay thickness prior to construction Scott Rd Antelope Rd 2.00 (mi) Resurf 26', 0.25' RMS to Briggs Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Verify overlay thickness prior to construction Seascape Ave Vander Veer Rd to Windward Dr 0.51 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 40' RMS Silver Tip Ln Glen Rd 0.07 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 7 to Cougar Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x $ 1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design .R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 22 0 22 20 0 20 26 0 26 207 0 207 207 0 207 73 0 73 11 0 11 96/97 J 97/98 J 98/99 1 99/00 J 00/01 D E R C 2 1 0 19 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 1 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 204 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 204 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 70 D E R C 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 22 May 30, 199e EW (ft)/PW (ft) Simpson Rd SR 79 to Warren Rd 2.75 (mi) 25. (ft)/ 32 (ft) Widen & Res 1.0 mi & Recont 1.75 mi 32',0.21' AC Spalding Dr Cambridge Ave to Hopewell Ave 0.25 (mi) 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 35' RMS State St 0.4 Mi N. Menlo to 0.69 Mi N. Menlo 0.29 (mi) 62 (ft)/ 62 (ft) Resurface 62', 0.21' AC SB 300 cycle 7 Stetson Ave Warren Rd to E'ly of Cawston to C.L 1.20 (mi) 27 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Resurf 30',AC Need to coordinate with the City of Hemet. Verify tha: reconstruction is not needed. Costs are RCTD costs only. Sunset View Dr Shady View Dr 0.20 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 7 to 0.20 mi NWIy 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Sunshine Ct Fore Dr 0.02 (mi) Resurf 26',0.21'AC SB 300 cycle 7 to Ely 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Surfside Ave Vander Veer Rd to Windward Dr 0.51 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 40' RMS Fund Source Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 68 697 765 33 0 33 75 0 75 40 155 195 22 0 22 11 0 11 73 0 73 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 D = Design. R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 J 97/98 198/99 + 99/00 1 00/01 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 68 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 30 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R D E R C 2 0 0 73 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 20 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 2 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 E R C 2 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 70 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 23 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Sylvester Rd Mission Tr 0.21 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC to Lakeview Terrace 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Tahquitz Rd San Jacinto Rd 0.25 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 7 to Dickenson Rd 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Tetterington St Hayes Ave to Grand Ave 0.30 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG Turner St Grand Ave SWIy 0.29 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 1.0'DG Fund Source Total Fund Source Amount x $1000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 198/99 1 99/00 00/01 300 22 D 0 0 2 0 0 E 0 0 1 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 other 0 C 0 0 19 0 0 Total 300 other, Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Tyter St 48th Ave to Coachella CL 0.25 (mi) 22 (ft)/ 22 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 22' RMS Coordinate with City of Coachella for paving of west half. Vaiiey Way SH60 to 34th St 0.42 (mi) 36 (ft)/ 36 (ft) Resurf 36',0.17'AC Coordinate with RCTC project A21065 Van Buren St 52th Ave to 55th Ave 1.51 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 24' A/C Coordinate with City of Coachella for 1/2 of project. 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 22 24 0 24 103 0 103 103 0 103 13 10 23 57 0 57 300 Measure A/Western D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 21 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D 0 0 0 0 2 E 0 0 0 0 1 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 100 300 Measure A/Western 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 100 D E R C 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 67 62 129 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 62 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 24 May 30, 19S EW (ft)/PW (ft) Via El Rancho Camino Aventura to Camino Idilio 0.25 (mi) 34 (ft)/ 34 (ft) Recon 34',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Via Montana Camino Aventura to Camino Campanero 0.50 (mi) 32 (ft)/ 32 (ft) Recon 32',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS Vineland St Edgar Canyon Channel 0.01 (mi) Construct box culvert 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Wade Rue Paray 0.07 (mi) Resurface to Sly 0.07 35 (ft)/ 35 (ft) Warner Tr Miles Ave to Nly 0.33 (mi) 28 (ft)/ 28 (ft) Reconstruct 28', 0.21' AC SB 300 cycle 8 Washington St Bridge French Valley Stream 0.01 (mi) 0 (ft)/ 0 (ft) Realign and replace existing bridge Watson Rd Antelope Rd to Palomar Rd 0.46 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS W/Berms Fund Source Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 301 other Total 301 other Total 300 other Total 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x $1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 98/99 1 99/00 1 00/01 47 0 0 E 0 R 0 0 C 0 47 102 0 102 403 0 403 12 0 12 230 0 230 45 137 182 60 0 60 1 1 0 45 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 100 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 0 0 52 20 0 0 0 0 0 331 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R C 0 0 11 34 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D E R 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 25 May 30, 1996 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) EW (ft)/PW (ft) Wellman Rd Terwilliger Rd to Kirby St 1.00 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Widen North side,0.5'DG; Resurf 26',0.21'RMS West Ridge Rd Double View Dr 0.42 (mi) Resurf 26',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 8 to SEIy 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Fund Source Total 300 other Total 300 other Total White Ave SH74 to Allen Ave 0.14 (mi) 30 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Const 26',0.5'DG,0.21'RMS 300 other Total Fund Source Amount x 51000 Measure A Funds by Fiscal Year Amount x S1000 = Design • 'R = Right of Way Acquisition = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 97/98 f 98/99 99/00 1 00/01 103 0 0 E 0 R 0 0 C 0 103 42 0 42 22 0 22 Wildwood Dr S Circle Dr 0.19 (mi) Resurf 24',0.17'AC SB 300 cycle 7 to Hemstreet PL 24 (ft)/ 24 (ft) Wood Rd Van Buren Blvd to Nly 1.02 (mi) 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Resurf 13' westside, 0.17'AC East side is in the City of Riverside Pursue coop w/City • SB 300 cycle 8 300 other Total 300 other Total Wood Rd Markham St 1.50 (mi) Resurf to Cajalco Rd 26 (ft)/ 26 (ft) 300 other Total Wood St Grand Ave to Sly 0.28 (mi) 24 (ft)/ 26 (ft) Recon 26',0.21'RMS on 0.5'DG 300 other Total 21 0 21 50 0 50 202 0 202 77 0 77 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 01 2 0 1 0 0 0 100 D E R C 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 39 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 1 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 0 0 E 1 0 0 0 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 18 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 2 1 0 47 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 E 0 0 0 1 0 R 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 200 0 300 Measure A/Western D E R C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 Measure A/Western 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Name Limits Length (mi) Description (comments) RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 26 May 30, 199 EW (ft)/PW (ft) Yawl Ave Vander Veer Rd to Windward Dr 0.51 (mi) 40 (ft)/ 40 (ft) Resurface 0.21', 40' RMS Fund Source Total 301 other Total Fund Source Amount x S1000 73 0 Measure A Funds by Fisca! Year Amount x S1000 D = Design R = Right of Way Acquisition E = Environmental C = Construction 96/97 f 97/98 J 98/99 f 99/00 1 00/01 D 0 E 0 R 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 70 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 1997-2001 Fund Source Summary RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT Page 27 May 30, 1996 Fund Fund Source Source Name 300 Measure A/Western 301 Measure A/Coachella Valley 302 Measure A/Palo Verde * Grand Totals * Fiscal Year (Amt x *1000) Fund Source Total Expenditure 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 (Amt x $1000) 3264 3467 3083 4234 4639 18687 829 614 601 676 490 3210 226 152 294 202 202 1076 4319 4233 3978 5112 5331 22973 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON CO MMISSION MEASURE 'A ' L OCAL FUNDS PR OGRAM FY 1996 — 1997 Agency: Prepared by: Dale: ITEM NO. City of Tem ec ul a Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works May 15, 1996 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS 1. Design and co nstruction of paveme nt r ehabilitation an d r econ structi on of majo r streets. 2• Wa lco tt Bypass -Nico las Roa d to .Calle Cirasol to Calle Cha pos to Wa lco tt Road to La Ser ena Way PROJECT TYPE Street r econstr ucti on and reh abilitation. Desig n and co nstr uction of two l ane paved roadway . T OTAL COST OUO's 950 2,420 Page 1 of 5 MEASURE 'A ' FUNDS 0u0's) 950 715 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE 'A ' L OCAL FUNDS PR OGRAM FY 199 7 — 199 8 Agency: Prepared by: Date: ITEM NO. 1. 2. City of Temecul a Joseph Kic ak, Dire ct or of Publi c W orks/City Engineer May 15, 1996 PROJECT NA ME / LIMITS Diaz Ro ad Extension from Winchester R oad beyond nor thern city limit to Wa shingt on St./Elm St. in Murrieta Pavement Ma na gement System -design and constru ctio n of pavement rehabilitation and reconstructio n of major str eets. PROJECT TYPE C onstructi on of tw o l ane paved roadway St reet rec onstructi on and rehabilit ati on TOTAL COST 1,350 975 Pag e2 of 5 MEASURE 1A' FUNDS ($000.j 800 975 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE 'A ' L OC AL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1998 — 1999 Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Temec ula Joseph Kic ak, Direct or of Public Works/City Engin eer May 15, 1996 PROJECT NA ME / LI MITS Pa vement Manageme nt System -d esign and con stru ctio n of pavement rehabilitati on and rec onstructio n of majo r streets. PROJECT TYPE St reet r ec onst ruction and rehabilitation TOTAL COST $000's 975 Page 3 of 5 MEASURE 'A' FUNDS ($000'i 975 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION C OM MISSI ON MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 199 9 —MSc 2000 Agenc y: City of T emecula Prepared by: Joseph Kic ak, Director of Public W orks/City Enginee r Date: May 15, 1996 ITEM NO. 1. PROJECT NAME / LI MITS Pavement Ma nagement System -design and co nstructio n of . pav eme nt rehabilitation a nd reconstructio n of ma jo r streets PROJECT TYPE Str eet r ec onstructi on and reh abilit ati on TOTAL COST 1,101 Page 4 of 5 MEASURE "A' FUNDS t 000's} 1,101 Agency: Prepared by: Da te: City of Tem ecula J oseph Kicak, Director of P ublic Works/City Engineer Nay 15, 1996 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS Pa veme nt Man age ment System -d esign and co nstruc tion of pa vement rehabilitati on and recon str uction of major street s RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON COMMISSI ON MEAS URE "A" LO CAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 198 - 199 2000-2001 PR OJECT TYPE St reet r ec onstructi on and rehabilit ation c u a Page a a MEASURE 'A" FUNDS �OpO�� 1,101 1,101 i -o N N COACHELLA VALLEY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION C OMMISSI ON MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PR OGRAM FY 1997 —2001 Age ncy: City of Cathedral City Prepa red by: David R. Faessel, City Engineer Date: May 30, 1996 ITEM NO. 1 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS FY 1996-97 City Public Works Department: Operation and Maintenance CARRY OVER PROJECTS 2 8916 - Miscellaneous Streets 3 8924 - Date Palm Medians, north of Gerald Ford 4 8928 - Circulation Plan Update 5 8941 - Sidewalks 6 8946 - ADA Projects - cityw ide 7 8951 - Downtown Assessment District PROJECT TYPE City wide street & highway facilities, maintenance, repair, upkeep Small street projects Raised median islands General Plan Update Construction of sidewalk -city wide Construction of ra mps Reconstruction of streets in Downtown TOTAL COST ($000 's) 1546 50 123 .8 98 36 70 1000 Page 1 of 2 - MEASURE 'A ' FUNDS 0OOO's) 673.7 36 123.8 8 36 70 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSP ORTATION CO MMISSION MEASURE 'A' L OCAL FUNDS PROGRA M FY 1997 — 2001 Agenc y: Prepared by: Da te: ITEM NO_ 1 1 1 1 City of Cathedral City David R. Faessel, City Engineer May 30, 1996 Page 2 d z. PROJECT NA ME / LIMITS FY 1997-98 City Public Works Department: Operations and Maintenance FY 1998-99 City Public Works Department: Operations and Maintenance FY 1999-2000 City Public Works Department: Operations and Maintenance FY 2000-2001 City Public Works Department: Operations and Maintenance PROJECT TYPE City Wide street and highway facilities, maintenance, repairs, & upkeep . City Wide street and highway facilities, maintenance, repairs, & upkeep . City Wide street and high way facilities, maintenance, repairs, & upkeep. City Wide street and highway facilities, maintenance, repairs, & upkeep. TOTAL COST ($000's) 1600 1656 1715 1775 MEASURE 'A' FUNDS ($000'4) 724 .3 781 .7 848.6 824 .2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1996-1997 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Greg Johnson, Finance Director Date: 5/30/96 6 c - Page 1 of ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS 93-04 Striping/Dotting 93-25 Slurry Seal,Citywide 93-48 Concrete Street Repair 98-08 Street Tree Replacement PROJECT TYPE Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation TOTAL COST ($000's) 20,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 . MEAS�IJR FUNDS ($000's) 20,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 TOTAL 140,000 140,000 F:ISUSAMMOE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1997-1998 Agency: Prepared by: Date: ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 r 98-08 Street Tree Replacement TOTAL City of Indian Wells Greg Johnson, Finance Director 5/30/96 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS 93-04 Striping/Dotting 93-25 Slurry Seal,Citywide 93-48 Concrete Street Repair PROJECT TYPE Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation TOTAL COST ($000's) 20,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 120,000 Pt ? of MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000's) 20,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 120,000 F:ISUSAN MOE RIVtRSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1998-1999 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Greg Johnson, Finance Director )ate: 5/30/96 Page 3 of ITEM NO. 1 I2 I3 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE Maintenance, Rehabilitation TOTAL COST ($000's) 20,000 MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000's) 20,000 Maintenance, Rehabilitation 40,000 40,000 93-48 Concrete Street Repair Maintenance, Rehabilitation 98-08 Street Tree Replacement Maintenance, Rehabilitation TOTAL 40,000 20,000 120,000 40,000 20,000 120,000 F:ISUSAMMOE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1999-2000 Agency: Prepared by: Date: ITEM NO. City of Indian Wells Greg Johnson, Finance Director 5/30/96 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST ($000's) Par of 1 2 93-04 Striping/Dotting 93-25 Slurry Seal,Citywide Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation 20,000 40,000 MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000's) 20,00C 40,000 40,000 20,000 120,000 3 4 93-48 Concrete Street Repair 98-08 Street Tree Replacement TOTAL Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation 40,000 20,000 120,000 F:ISUSAN MOE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2000-2001 Agency: "epared by: ate: ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 City of Indian Wells Greg Johnson, Finance Director 5/30/96 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS 93-04 Striping/Dotting 93-25 Slurry Seal,Citywide 93-48 Concrete Street Repair 98-08 Street Tree Replacement TOTAL PROJECT TYPE Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation Maintenance, Rehabilitation TOTAL COST ($000's) 20,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 120,000 Page 5 of 5 MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($000's) 20,000 40,000 40,000 20,000 120,000 FASUSAN MOE RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON COMMISSI ON MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1997 -2001 Agency: CITY OF INDIO Prepared by: AMIR H. MODARRESSI Dale : MAY 31, 1996 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS PR OJECT TYPE HWY 111 ( Mon roe Street to Rubid oux Street) Pl an Devel opment,R.0.W„ Constru c- HWY 111 and Indio Blvd intersecti on rehabilit ati on Plan Devel opmentg, ti on 'C onstruction E ngin eering, Fre d war ing C onstr ucti on g• and (Silver woo d to Monroe Street) Plan Devel opment,R .O.W ., Construc- tio n E ngi neering, C onstructi on Je fferson Stree t(We stwa rd Ho to" Fred Wa ring D riv e) Plan Devel opment, R.0 .W.,Constru - Je ffer son Street(Fr ed War ing Dr ive to Indi o Blvd.) Plan Development,R.O .W.,C onst ru c ti on E ngine ering, Construction Madison Stree t( Aven ue 49 to HWY 111) tion Engi neerin c ucti on Plan Devel opment, R.O.WrC onst ruc- Ma dison Street Lion Engineering, Construction ( Avenu e 50 to Avenu e 49) Pl an Development,ROW, C onst ruc- ti on Engineering, Const ructi on T OTAL COST 000's P age 1 of 1 MEASURE 'A' FUNDSOg0•e� $ 3,538 $ 1,714 $ 726 $ 467,314 $ 1,982.784 $ 495 .696 $ 1,678 $ 503.400 $ 1,951 $ 585 .300 $ 1,820 $ 910 $ 4,431 $ 941 .611 TOTAL $ 16,126.784 $ 5,617.321 Agency: CITY OF INDIO Prepared by:AMIR H. MODARRESSI Dale: MAY 31, 1996 ITEM NO. 1 2 3 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATION CO MMISSI ON MEASURE 'A` LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM • FY 1996 — 199 7 PR OJECT NA ME / LI MITS HWY 111 ( Mo nroe Street to Rubid oux Street ) HWY 111 and Indio Blvd intersecti on Reh abilitati on Fr ed Waring Drive( Silverwoo d to Monr oe Str eet) PR OJECT TYPE � y Pl an Devel opment, ROW, C onstru c- ti on Engine ering, Constr ucti on Pl an Devel opment, ROW, C onst ruc- tion Enginee ring, C onst ruction Plan Devel opmet, ROW, C onst ru c- ti on E ngineering, Constr ucti on TOTAL T OTAL C OST $ 2514.80 $ 726 $ 1,982 .784 $ 5,223.584 Pag e 1 of 5 MEASURE "A• $ 1,218.304 467.314 $ 495.696 2,181.314 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 199 7 - 1998 Agency: CITY OF INDIO Pre pared by: AMIR MODARRESSI Dale: MAY 31,1996 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS 1 HWY 111 ( Mon roe to Rubidoux Street) PROJECT TYPE Const ructi on 2 Je ffer son Str eet ( Westward Ho to F red Wa ring $ 1,023,200 $ 495 .696 ) Plan Development, ROW, C on st ruc- tio n E ngineering,Ccnst ructi on 1,678 $ 503.400 Page 2 of 5 TOTAL COST MEASURE 'A' $000's FUNDS $ap0's� TOTAL $ 2,701 .20 999.096 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATI ON C OMMISSION MEASURE 'A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 199 8 - 1999 Age ncy: CITY OF INDIO Prepared by: AMIR H MODARRESSI Date: MAY 31, 1996 ITEM NO. 5 6 PROJECT NA ME / LIMITS Jeffer so n Stree t (Fred W ari ng Drive to Indi o Blvd) Ma dison Street( Av enu e 49 to HWY 111) PROJECT TYPE Plan Development ROW, C onstruc- tion Enginee ring, Constructio n Plan Devel opm ent, ROW, C onstruc- tio n Enginee ring, Constructi on TOTAL TOTAL COST ;000•a $ 1,951 $ 1,200 $ 3,151 Pag e 3 of 5 MEASURE 'A ' FUNDSi$000'g) $ 585.300 $ 600.00 $ 1,185.30 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSP ORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE 'A ' L OCAL FUNDS PROGRA M FY 1999 — 2000 Agency: CITY OF INDIO Prepared by: AMIR H MODARRESSI Date: MAY 31, 1996 ITEM NO. PROJECT NA ME / LIMITS Page 4 of 5 MEASURE 'A ' 6 Madison Str ee t ( Av enue 49 to HWY 111) $t�t7's FUNDS $t7tltl's Const ruction $ 310 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSI ON MEASURE 'A ° LOCAL FUNDS PR OGRA M FY 2000 — 2001 Agency: CITY OF INDIO Prepared by: AMIR H MODARRESSI Date: MAY 31, 1996 ITEM NO. 7 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS Madison Street ( Avenue 50 to Aven ue 49 ) PR OJECT TYPE Plan Developme nt, ROW, Constru c- tion Engin eering, C onst ructi on TOTAL TOTAL COST ($Ooo'aj $ 4, 431 $ 4,431 Pag e 5 of 5 MEASURE 'A' FUNDS $OOO'a) $ 941 .611 $ 941 .611 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON COM MISSI ON MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PRO GRAM • FY 199 6 — 199 7 Age ncy: CITY OF PALM DESEU Prepered by: Richard J. Folkers, P.E. Dats by 16,• 1996 ITEM NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. PROJECT NAME 1 UMITS Tr affic Signa l Co ordinatio n on Fred Wari ng Drive Monter ey Avenue, Co untry Clu b Drive, and Cb ok Street. Opticam on Highway 111 and no n -State Streets that cu rrently do n ot ha ve Optican. San Pa blo Avenue - Highway 111 to El Pa seo Pales to Pines Driveway -- Highway 111 East Of Pla za t.Jay PR OJECT TYPE Inte rc onnecti on t raffic v gnde a pr mi encLon activated erQ Wid ening a nd tr affic sig nal improveme nt s. Provide o ne-way inbound driv ew ay off Highw ay 111 E/0 Plaz a Clay TOTAL COST $000's $200,000 200,000 600,000 125,000 1,125,000 Page 1 of 5 MEASURE "A' FUNDS ;oao's, $200,000 200,000 600,000 125,000 1,125,000 Agency: CITY OF PALL DESERT Prepared by: Richard J. F olk ers Data: Hay 16, 1996 ITEM NO . 1. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CO MMISSION MEASURE 'A° LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM • FY 199 7 — 1998 PROJECT NAME / UMITS Stree t Repa ir s on Major City Stre ets. PROJECT TYPE Ove rl ay on dete ri or ated arte rial and maj or st reets. T OTAL COST $000's $500,000 Pag e = d MEASURE 'A FUNDS $000' $500,000 Agency: CITY OF PAIII DESERT Prepared by: Richard J. Folkers Date:Ifay 16, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON CO MMISSION MEASURE •A° LOCAL FUNDS PR OGRAM • FY 1998 — 1999 Fr ed Waring Dr ive Bridge at the P alm Valley Chann el P61g.L of_ MEASURE 'A FUNDS $000 • Wideni ng the Bridg e �.- .�.�00, 000 $500.000 Agency: CITY OF PAIL -1 DESERT Prepared by: Richard J. Folk ers Dale: ', lay 16, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION C OM MISSI ON MEASURE •A • L OCAL FUND8 PROGRAM • FY 199 9 — 2000 PROJECT NAME / UMITS P'fajor Str eet Sidewalk PR OJECT TYPE Widening to 3 l anes in e ach directio n whe re applic abl e. P rovide sidew alk al ong m ajor str eets for ped estria n safety . T OTAL COST $000'. $1,500,000 250,000 $1,750,000 Page 4 of MEASURE 'A FUNDS $000' $1,500,000 250,000 $1,750,000 Agency: CITY OF PALM DESERT Pre pared by: Richard J. Folkers Date: May 16, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION C OMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PRO GRAM • FY 2000 - 2001 PROJECT NAME / LIMITS Fran k Sinatra Drive from Cook Str eet to Ge rald For d Drive. Co ok Street fro m Country Club Driv e Waring Drive. Wideni ng and Median inst allation Fred Median installation and street repairs . TOTAL COST $000's P age 5 d - MEASURE •p FUNDS $000' $850,000 $850,000 400,000 1,25 QQO,25 15 400,000 1,250,000 RIVE RSIDE COL] N1'y TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIO N MEASU RE "A " LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1996-1997 Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Public Works Departme nt) June 30, 1996 ITEM NO, 3. 5 7. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Annual Rubber Chip Seal Coat Residential Street Impro vements Cro ssley Road (Mesquite — Avenue 34) Mesquite Ave. (Desert Way — Demuth Park) A. D. 155 Assistance Gene Autry Tr./Highway 111 Intersection 8• Sunrise Way and Racquet Club 9. Sunrise W v and Via Escuela 10. Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Program) 11. ARH M Overlays/Reconstruction 12. Indian Canyo n 2 -Way Traffic Study PROJECT TYPE Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) Rubber Chip (C ontract Crews) Various Locations (Annual) Widen west 1/2 street Street Widening — south 1/2 City Contribution to District Widen, add turn lanes Traffic Sign al & Street Improvements Traffic Signal Various Bridges Various Locations Conversion to 2 -Way 1996/97 TO TALS Page 1 of 1 TOTAL COST 600,000 650,000 150,000 75,000 15,000 200,000 700,000 200,000 140,000 10,000 350,000 40.000 3,130,000 MEASURE "A" FUN DS 600,000 650,000 150,000 75,000 15,000 200,000 140,000 200,000 140,000 10,000 350,000 40,000 2,570,000 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROG RAM FY 1997-1998 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Robert L. Mohler (Public Works Department) Date: Ju ne 30, 1996 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL C OST MEASURE ..A.. FUN DS 2. Ann ual Street Slurry Seals (C ontract) Rubber Chip Seal Coat 3. 4 Residential Street Improvements Annual Overlays/Reconstruction Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) Rubber Chip (Contract Crews) Various Locations (Annual) Various Locati ons 200,000 200,000 150,000 300.000 5. 6. • 8. 9. Mesquite Ave. (Desert Way - Williams Baristo (Civil - Farrell) Tah__gc uitz Canyon and El Cielo Caballero s and Racquet Club Farrell Dr. and Tamarisk 10. Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Pro gram) Street Widening — south 1/2 Street Reconstructi on Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Various Bridges 1997/98 TOTALS 210,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 10,000 1,670,000 200,000 200,000 150,000 300,000 210,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 10,000 1,670,000 RI VERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA'T'ION COM TSSI ON MEAS URE "A" LOCAL FUN DS PRO GRAM FY 1998-1999 Agency: Prepared by: D ate: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Public Works Departme nt) June 30, 1996 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. PROJECT NAME/LIMITS Annual Stree t Slurry Seals (C ontract) An nual Rubber Chip Seal Coat Residential Street Impro vements Ramon Road (Sunrise — El Cielo) Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Program) PROJECT TYPE Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) Rubber Chip (Contract Crews) Vari ous Locations (Annual) Widen from 4 6o 6 lanes Vari ous Bridges 1998/99 TOTALS TOTAL COST 400,000 700,000 150,000 1,871,000 10.000 $3,131,000 MEASURE "A" FU NDS 400,000 700,000 150,000 935,500 '0.000 $2,195,500 RIVERSI DE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMIISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1999-2000 Agency: Prepared by: Date: ITEM NO. City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (P ublic Works Departme nt) June 30, 1996 PROJECT NAME/LIMITS Annual Rubber Chip Seal Coat Residential Street Improvements 5. Overlay /Reconstruction PR OJECT TYPE Page 1 of 1 MEASURE T OTAL "A" C OST FUNDS Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) 200,000 200,000 Rubber Chip (Contract Crews) 200,000 200,000 Various Locations (Annual) 150,000 150,000 Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes 3,600,000 900,000 Various Locations 15,000 15,000 Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Program) Various Bridges 1999/2000 TOTALS $4,160,000 $1,660,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIO N MEASURE "A" LOCAL FU NDS P ROGRAM FY 2000-2001 Agency: Prepared by: Date: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Public Works Department) J une 30, 1996 Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PROJECT NAME/LIM1TS PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) An nual Rubber Chip Seal Coat Residential Street Improvements E. Palm Canyon (Sunrise - Gene Autry) Mesquite Ave. (Sunrise - Callo Palo Pierro) Gene Autry Trail and Interstate 10 Bridge Misc. Repairs (Annual Program) Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) Rubber Chip (C ontract Crews) Various Locations (Annual) ARHM Overlay Resconstruct Street Interchange (wide to 4 lanes) Various Bridges 200012001 TOTALS 700,000 150,000 350,000 600,000 6,500,000 10,000 $6,310,000 700,000 150,000 350,000 600,000 1,625,000 10,000 $3,300,000 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY TRANSPORTATION COM MISSI ON MEASURE "A' LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM • FY 199 — 199 Agency: City of Rancho Mirage Prepared by: Eldon K. L ee, Dire ctor of Public Works Dale: M ay 29, 1996 ITEM NO. 1 • PROJECT NAME / LIMITS Bob Hope Drive Improvem ent s• From: Frank Sinatra Driv e to Di nah Shore Drive 96/97 Savings from Frank Sina tra Drive Proje ct and• 96-97 alloca tion PR OJECT TYPE Reconstru ction and wid ening TOTAL. COST ($000`.) $2,100 P age 1 of 1 MEASURE 'A ' FUNDS ($000'a; $ 770 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATI ON CO MMISSION MEASURE 'A ' L OCAL FUNDS PROGRAM • FY 199 — 199 Agency: Prepared by: Dale: ITEM NO. 1 2 3 City of Rancho Mirage Eldon K. L ee, Di recotr of Public Works May 29, 1996 ' PROJECT NA ME / LIMITS DaVa 11 Drive widening From: Gerald Ford Drive to Dinah Shor e Drive 97198 Montere y Avenue/Cou ntry Club Int ersection Design 97/98 Cons truction 98/99 DaVall Drive Construction Fro m: Din ah Shore to Ramon Ro ad Design 98/99 Constr uction 99/00 4 Din ah Shor e Drive Improveme nt From: DaVall Drive to Los Almos Drive 00/01 5 Bob Hope Drive Improve ments From: Frank Sinatra Drive to W hitewate r Storm Channel 00/01 PROJECT TYPE Wide ning Recon struction/Wid ening New C onstruction Widening Re surfa cing and Widening TOTAL COST $000's $ 370 300 390 680 1,000 Page 1 of 1 MEASURE 'A ' FUNDS $000's $ 350 50 250 35 355 340 461 AGENDA ITEM #6B DATE: TO: FROM: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 3, 1996 Budget and Finance Committee Dean Martin, Chief Financial Officer Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to FY 1996-2000 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Palm Springs The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. In addition, the cities in the Coachella Valley and the County must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are also required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) accompanied by documentation supporting the calculation. The City of Palm Springs' Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan was approved by the Commission at its September 13, 1995 meeting. The City is requesting an amendment to their Plan in order to include changes to their FY 1995-96 capital improvement plan and to defer two projects to FY 1996-97. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve an amendment to the FY 1996-2000 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Palm Springs as submitted. :jw " 4.. Public Works Administration TEL: (619) 323-8179 FAX: (619) 322-8325 TDD: (619) 864-9727 June 6, 1996 City of Palm: Springs Mr. Jerry Rivera Staff Analyst III Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, California 92501 Re: 1995-96 Measure "A" Local Funds Program (Amendments) Dear Jerry: " s This is the City's request to amend the RCTC fiscal year 1995-96 Measure "A" expenditure plan regarding current year projects. The Street Maintenance division chose to combine the slurry seal and traffic signal projects into a large rubberchip seal coat project this year. The slurry and signal projects will be rolled -over to next year (1996-97). Other changes also noted (see attachment), modifying 95-96 total from $1,026,875 to $982,741. Sincerely, Robert L. Mohler Transportation and Grants Manager RLM: mmk Attachment: RCTC 1995-96 Measure "A" Local Funds Program (Revised) cc: Tom Kanarr, Director of Finance/Treasurer Ron Everett, Accounting Manager David L. Strecker, Director of Public Works Post Office Box 2743, Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 RIVERSIDE C OUNT Y MAJ. ,LiP ORTATION COMMISSION ME ASURE " A" L OCAL FUNDS P ROGRAM FY 1995 = 1996 Agency: Prepared by: D ate: City of Palm Springs Robert L. Mohler (Public Works Departme nt) Ju ne 30, 1995 (Revised 6/6196) Page 1 of 1 ITEM NO. *1. *2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. *8. *9. *10. (New) PROJECT NAME/LIMITS 1995/96 (07/01/95 — 06/30/96) Annual Street Slurry Seals (In-house) Annual Street Slurry Seals (Contract) Rubber Chip Seal Coat Sunrise Way/E. Palm Canyon Drive Crossley Ro ad (Mesquite — Avenue 34) Mesquite Avenue (D esert Way - Williams) Gene Autry Tr./Highway 111 Intersection (Design Only) Sunrise Way and Racquet Club Sunrise Way and Via Escuela Bridge Misc. Repairs PROJECT TYPE TOTAL COST MEASURE "A" FUNDS Slurry Streets (City Crews) Slurry Streets (C ontract Crews) Rubber Chip (Contract Crews) Widen, add turn lanes Widen west 1/2 street (Design Only) Street Widening Widen, add turn lanes Traffic Signal & Street Improvements Traffic Signal 1995/96 REVISED TOTALS 760,000 384,685 75,000 15,000 61,475 7 341 1,303,501 *Rebudget in 1996-97 (Items 1, 2, 8 & 9 combined into item 3) 00 .00 00.00 760,000 115,400 75,000 15,000 10,000 00.00 00.00 7.341 982,741 AGENDA ITEM #6C DATE: TO: FROM: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 3, 1996 Budget and Finance Committee Dean Martin, Chief Financial Officer Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to FY 1995-1999 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City .of Palm Springs The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to annually provide to the Commission a five year plan on how those funds are to be expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. In addition, th.e cities in the Coachella Valley and the County must be participating in CVAG's Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. The agencies are also required to submit the annual certification of Maintenance of Effort (MOE) accompanied by documentation supporting the calculation. The City of Palm Springs' Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan was approved by the Commission at its December 14, 1994 meeting. During the Commission's FY 1995 Measure "A" audit of the City, it was discovered that the City had failed to seek Commission approval to amend their Plan to include an additional project, so the project was questioned by the auditors. Therefore, the City is requesting an amendment to their Plan in order to .include a project which was subsequently added to their original Plan submission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve an amendment to the FY 1995-1999 Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for the City of Palm Springs as submitted. • :jw City of Palm Springs Public Works Administration TEL: (619) 323-8179 FAX: (619) 322-8325 TDD: (619) 864-9527 June 5, 1996 Mr. Jerry Rivera Staff Analyst III Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, California 92501 Re: 1994-95 Measure "A" Expenditure Plan Amendment (City Project No. 94-22 — Municipal Golf Course Bikeway) Dear Jerry: This is a written request to amend the RCTC fiscal year 1994-95 Measure "A" expenditure plan regarding one project_ This is at RCTC's request regarding the financial report by Ernst and Young, LLP (9/28/95). The Municipal Golf Course bikeway project was constructed in 1995 using SB-821 grant funds as the primary funding source. Due to insufficient general funds, the City used Measure "A" funds as a portion of the required 20% local fund match. Since the bikeway project was not listed on RCTC's 1994-95 C.I.P., we respectfully request that the City's local Measure "A" match of $6,000 be listed as an amendment to the RCTC 1994-95 Measure "A" Expenditure Plan. Sincerely, Robert L. Mohler Transportation and Grants Manager RLM:mmk cc: Tom Kanarr, Director of Finance/Treasurer Ron Everett, Accounting Manager David L. Strecker, Director of Public Works Post Office Box 2743, Palm Springs, California 92263-2743 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE 'A ° L OCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1994 — 1995 Age ncy: City of Pal m Springs Prepare d by: R. L. Mohler (Public Works Dept.) Date: June 30, 1994 ITEM NO. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. *7. PROJECT NAME / LIMITS 1994/95 (7/01/94 - 6/30/95) Annual Street Slurry Seal (In-house) Annual Street Slurry Seal (Contract) Sunrise Way/E. Palm Canyon Dr. Crossley Road (Mesquite - Ave. 34) Mesquite Ave. (Desert Way - William s) Palm Canyon Drive (Mesquite - Baristo) Municipal Golf Course Bikeway PROJECT T YPE Slurry Streets (City Crews) Slurry Streets (Contract Crews) Widen, add turn pockets Widen west 1/2 street (Design only) street widening Asphalt Rubber Overlay (ARHM) 1994/95 Totals *Goal: $942,537 Colored Concrete *Revised Costs TOTAL COST $000': $ 200 • '200 900 132 15 270 $1,717 $ 69 $1,786 P age _L o1 1 MEASURE "A' FUNDS $000'. $ 200 200 126 132 15 270 $ 943* $ 6 949 AGENDA ITEM #6D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: • July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Rock Fall Mitigation for Lamb Canyon Route 79 Project and Resolution of Cut Slope C-2 and other Miscellaneous Slope Clean-up Issues At the May 8, 1996 Commission meeting, the Commission was informed that Caltrans had recommended that RCTC undertake a follow-up safety project to eliminate the possibility of falling rock striking passing vehicles or blocking the Lamb Canyon roadway. The safety project would include covering the areas on the steep slopes, that would be susceptible to falling rock with wire mesh. The Commission further directed Staff to prepare a bid package and advertise the construction plans that would be necessary to have the mesh installed. It is important that this work be performed before the rainy season begins. In order to prepare the bid package for advertisement, Staff will have to modify the existing agreements with several consultants. Converse Consultants (Geologists) will negotiate with Caltrans regarding the exact location and the appropriate construction details for the installation of the wire mesh. Greiner (Design Engineer) will modify existing grading drawings to show the new installation of the wire mesh material. O'Brien Kreitzberg (Construction Management) will provide a resident engineer/inspector and will provide the direct interface with the selected contractor for the installation of the wire mesh material. A separate agenda item has been prepared for each of the above named consultants in order to be able to execute an additional amendment to each of their agreements. This agenda item will provide the overall impact to both budget and schedule for the completion of the rock fall mitigation portion of the work in Lamb Canyon. A future agenda item will discuss the • final closeout with the existing contractor C.A. Rasmussen who has filed a request for additional compensation related to the slide removal change orders. In addition to the installation of the wire mesh, Staff is also recommending that Cut Slope C-2 will also be regraded with this new construction agreement. Cut Slope C-2 has been subject to surficial surface failures subsequent to its initial grading. The existing .75 to 1 slope is largely stable is in an area where the continued erosion of the surface material will not pose a threat to public safety. Caltrans has requested that this slope be cut back to 1.5 to 1 prior to their final acceptance of the project. Page 2 The new right-of-way limits will only allow that the slope be cut back to a slope of 1 to 1. If Caltrans agrees to a slope of 1 to 1, Staff suggests including the work as a bid alternate in the rock fall mitigation work. If Caltrans does not agree and insists on laying back the slope further, than the work will have to be postponed to a later date. Other slope cleanup issues exist and can be addressed with the rock fall mitigation work. The following table reflects the estimated cost of construction for the rock fall mitigation project and the resolution of the remaining miscellaneous slope clean-up issues: Item 1 2 Description Converse Consultants (Geologists)' Greiner (Design Engineer) Subtotal Engineering Amount $37,890 $30,969 Totals $68,859 3 Engineers Estimate for Construction of rock containing mesh and slope cleanup. $650,000 4 Construction Contingency @ 10% 5 6 O'Brien Kreitzberg (Construction Management) County of Riverside (Surveying) Subtotal Construction Grand Total $65,000 $86,950 $20,000 $821,950 $890,809 The rock fall mitigation effort is between $500,000 to $600,000 of the above amount. The remainder can be attributed to slope clean-up. Staff elected not to use C.A. Rasmussen(CAR) to perform the final slope clean-up work because of the CAR request for additional money that has been submitted to the Commission, and requesting them to perform additional work could adversely impact the Commission's ability to resolve the issue. The proposed rock fall mitigation project schedule is as follows: Advertise Plans Bid Opening Award Contract Start of Construction Construction Duration August 25, 1996 September 9, 1996 September 11, 1996 September 30, 1996 2 months Page 3 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission: 1) Direct staff to proceed with the preparation of the plans, specifications, and estimates for the rock fall mitigation effort as directed at the May 8, 1996 Commission meeting; and, 2) Modify the existing Consultant agreements with Converse Consultants, Greiner, and O'Brien Kreitzberg to assist in the preparation the plans, specifications and estimate. :jw AGENDA ITEM #6E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3,1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Amendment No. 2 for O'Brien-Kreitzberg & Associates (OKA) to Perform Additional Construction Management Services for the Route 79 Lamb Canyon Project (RCTC Agreement No. 94-23) for Rock Fall Mitigation and Cut Slope Clean-up In a previous agenda item, the Commission considered the issue of providing rock fall mitigation and slope clean-up work for Route 79 (Lamb Canyon). Pending the Commission approval of the staff recommendations for that item, it is necessary to modify several consultant agreements to complete the necessary work. One such agreement is with O'Brien-Kreitzberg & Associates who are providing the construction management required to complete the Lamb Canyon Project. The following table summarizes their contract history: Amendment 1 extra work 2 (new) extra work Description Original Agreement To extend Construction Management to June 1996 To extend Construction Management to June 1996 Subtotal authorized contract amount to date To provide Construction Management services during rock fall mitigation and cut slope clean-up Remaining extra work available to perform rock fall mitigation Subtotal amount required for rock fall mitigation New Contract Value Amount $1,150,784 $143,909 $199,216 $1,493,909 $71,950 $15,000 $86,950 $1,580,859 Attached is letter from OKA outlining their proposed scope of work to provide construction management services to complete the rock fall mitigation work, and clean-up of the remaining cut slope issues. The following is a summary of their request for additional funds to perform the extra services: Item 1 2 Description Task 1 - Preconstruction Services to prepare Plans, Specifications and Estimates Task 2 - Construction Management Amount $14,950 $72,000 Total for Amendment 2 $86,950 Based on the above evaluation, Amendment 6 will require an amount of $71,950. Staff recommends that $10,000 of presently available extra work be maintained in the event of any unforeseen additional work items. A standard contract amendment will be used to amend Agreement RO 93-06. This amendment would increase the total contract value from $1,493,909.17 to $1,580,859 and keep $10,000 available for possible future extra work. All terms and conditions of the original agreement (Agreement RO 94-23) would remain in effect except as revised by this amendment. A standard ,amendment will be used for this agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve Amendment 2 to Agreement RO 94-23 with O'Brien Kreitzberg for "Construction Management Services for Route 79 Gilman Springs Road to First Street" in the amount of $71950 for a revised contract amount of $1,580,859 and keep $10,000 available for possible future extra work. :jw O'Brien-Kreitzberg Professional Construction Managers June 24, 1996 Mr. Bill Hughes Project Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Route 79 Lambs Canyon Measure "A" Project RCTC Contract No. RO-9423 Construction Management Services - Rockfall Mitigation Extra Services Request No 4 O'Brien-Kreitzberg Project No. 900372 Dear Mr. Hughes, O'Brien-Kreitzberg (O.K) is pleased to submit a revised cost proposal to perform preconstruction and construction management services related to the rockfall mitigation contract on Route 79 in Lambs Canyon. We have based our proposal on three months of part-time assistance for the preconstruction phase and three months of full time construction management services. Based on our previous conversations, we have anticipated that a notice to proceed would be issued in early July '96. Since this effort was not included with our previous scope of work, we request your consideration of issuing a contract amendment, including an extension to our contract, with corresponding additional compensation related to the above referenced project. Reference is made to our letter dated May 7, 1996, which gives a brief overview of the rockfall mitigation project including an estimated project budget. Based on previous discussions with RCTC, the proposed Design Engineer, Greiner, and the proposed Geotechnical Engineer, Converse Consultants, we have identified the following O.K. scope of work for the rockfall mitigation project: Task 1 - PreConstruction Services • Design/Geotechnicaf, ROTC and Caltrans Coordination • Conduct Constructability Review • Assist with Project Advertising and Answer Bidder Questions • Conduct Pre -Bid Conference • • Coordinate the Preparation of Addendum Documents • Review Construction Bids, Bonds, and Insurance, and Recommend Contract Award Task 2 - Construction Services • Conduct Pre -Construction Conference • Administer Construction Contract in Accordance with Caltrans Requirements • RCTC, Caltrans, and Specialty Consultant Coordination • Conduct Construction Inspections • Project Close -Out Mr Bill Hughes continued June 24, 1996 Page 2 of 3 It was assumed that the OK work effort for the preconstructiQ the initial stages and would become more involved during bidding theson, ws hays assumed that toe initial wory would n phase would bre limited outing during bwdiha the RCTC office would be utilizedw 9 ct at anof the O.K. office project. For this during construction RCTC woulfired provide conducted at so as required. We office and construction administration personnel. suable office space and equipment also assumed that �# pment to facilitate the For this request, it is proposed to utilize the unused Extra Se rvices Contract Amendment No. 1 so that the additional funding is reduced. estimateied thatth approximately $14,500 will be remaining in the authorized budget construction contract in early July 7996. educed. We utilizedconstruction for any contract in arty July closeout work eoto wa 9 at the conclusion w the However, it was assumed that this budget would be therefore, this budget was not used to offset the cost of this assist with any claims negotiations, The multipliers for this proposal. proposal are based on our most current actual F.A.R. adjusted overhead rates. The new payroll additive ratio is 0.35 and the home office and site office overhead ratio's are 0.92 and 0.76 respectively. The direct labor equates to a total multiplier of 2.27 for home office and 1 Q 5 percent of themultiplier and costs for the the ratio remains 1.00. is The 10.5 annual the direct labor and overhead costs for the e)ra Wor, An estimated 5 percent ar,nual esealtion of all and e all 2 13 for field. The ma is based on extra work, An estimated 5 The estimated cost for this extra service owed far in October 1 gg6 Forecast for more detailed information] proposal is as follows: (Refer to the attached Budget Extra Services Estimate Task 1 - FreConstruction Services Site r 64 Hours Overhead @ 113.02% Fee @ 10.5% Other Direct Costs Subtotal Home Office Labor 102 Hours Overhead @ 126.66% Fee @ 10.5 % Other Direct Costs Subtotal Total for Task 1 2,300.00 2.600 510.00 0.00 3,610.00 45 7 860.00 500.00 5,410.00 9,540.00 14, 950.00 Mr Bill Hughes continued Task 2 - Construction Management Site Labor 600 Hours Overhead @ 126.66% Fee @ 10.5% Other Direct Costs Subtotal Home Office Labor 160 Hours Overhead @ 126.66% Fee @ 10.5 % Other Direct Costs Subtotal 22, 680.00 25.630.00 5,070.00 5, 000.00 5,440.00 890.00 1,290.00 0.00 58, 380.00 13 620.00 June 24, 1996 Page 3 of 3 Total for Task 2 72 2 000.00 Total Project Budget This Request 86, 950.00 Less Unused Extra Services for Contract Amendment No 1 <25,000.00> ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUESTED $61,950.00 For your reference, we have attached a detailed budget forecast for this extra work and a proposed project schedule. Your consideration of this matter is greatly appreciated. We look forward to serving RCTC on this assignment and bringing the project to a successful completion. Please give me a call if you have any questions or require further information regarding this matter. Very Truly Yours, Jdseph H. Siino, P.E. Resident Engineer Attachments: Budget Forecast and Project Schedule CC: Joe Seibold, Tom Bryant, Wendy Wargnier 00261 /062496. ftr Cat. 20.3, 49.4.13 O'Brien-Kreitzberg Inc. Telephone (909) 654-0446 Fax (909) 654-7585 2055 N. Sanderson Ave, 8. San Jacinto, CA. 92582 O'Brien—Kre itrberg Inc Roc kfa ll M iti• . tion Bud. et Forc ast Task 1.0 — Pre con stru ction Service s (July 12, 1996 thru Se ptember 13, 1996) T. Bryant Principal J. Siino Proj Manager W. Wargnier Contract M anager T.B.D. Admin Manager T.B. D. Clerical Task 2.0 — Co nstruc tion Management S ^�~ ( epte mbe r 23, 1996 thru D ecember 27, 1996) Lo ca tio n Field Name T.B.D. Resident Engineer Subto tal Field lattice Ho me Title T. Bryant Principal J. Siino Proj M anager W. Wargnier Co ntract Manager T. B.D. Admin Manager T. B.D. Clerical Subtotal Home Office Est H Ho urs Pro fessiona l Con struction Managers 06/24/96 Billing Dir ect Est OH Est Fee Est ODC Rate Labor Cost 600 37.80 C ost Cosh Est To s t 22, 680-00 Cost C ost 600 12 66.26 52 37.80 16 37.96 40 30 .45 40 21.00 160 Total Projec t Budget This Request Less Unuse d Extra Servic es for Contract Amendment No 1 Additional Funding Requested C:1123r34\For ms \O1CROCK . WK3 22, 680.00 25, 630.00 5, 070.00 5,000 .00 58, 380.00 800.00 1,970.00 610.00 1,220 .00 840.00 5.44aoo a 6 890,00 M x 34, 030 .00 39, 690.00 1, 290.00 7, 730.00 0 .00 13 620 .00 5,500 .00 86, 950.00 (25,000.00 *61 950 .00 Q''B ri en-Kr-eitzUe:rg Inc Pr ofession al Constru ctio n Managers P ock 1011 il_,1 , Pr oject '_ cI-ies'luie Ac Fi vi ty Res -F' F'or- I -y Beg Dote End Dote Pr' ecorrstr-uctior-i - Notice to Pro ceed_] - C orivel =F F'CT1= H./ /21/96 Prep -Jr. .? Rockfoll Mltigoti r .r, F'wpor-t Corn 12/9F, Notice to r oce.ed - Gr einer/4F. ,06/24/91_17, F'CTC 07/11/9x. 07/11/9(, Pre pore 90% Pion Grein er 07/12/96 (17/31/96 90% Coltra ns Submittal Gr einer 08/01/96 08/01/96 Con st. ructaloility Rev iew Q'.K- 08/05/9t, O8/06/96 Coltrons Review Coltran 087'05/9608/16/96 Pre pare 100% Plan s - Greiner- 08/19/9E, 087'23/9E Adver tis e RCTC ./Q'K 08/25,'909/ 08/9F, Pr e -Bid Confer e ce ROTC/Q'K 0.1),1:14/91i-, 09/04/9. Bid Opening R'CTC/Q'F 0'9/09/9609/09/96 Rev iew Bids RC TC /Q'F' 0'9/09/9x. (9/10/96 Awar d Con str uc tion Contrrac_t, ROTC 09/11/9E 09/11/96 Notice To Pro ceed. RC TC /Q'1 iJ'9/13/'?r", 09/13/91. Construction Manoger" ient Pre pore Field Q'ffice O. K. 09/23/960'9/27/96 Preconstructio n Con fe r- e rne O.K. 09/26/9609/26/96 Co nstru ction O. K. (:7'9/30/9612/13/96 Project Clo se-ou t O. K. 12/16/96 12/27/96 Jul y Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 1 1 Pm i" imm 1 �% �% . / . J /1 -/i .'/A I" �% ii Greiner June 20, 1996 Mr. Bill Hughes Riverside County Transportation Commission 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Iamb Canyon Rock Mitigation Program Dear Bill: Greiner, Inc. 1241 East Dyer Road, Suite 250 P.O. Box 1948 Santa Ana. Calibmia 92705 (714) 556-9260 FAX: (714) 979-7928 Attached is a revised scope of work (including, a schedule) and a cost proposal to complete the rock mitigation and revised grading civil plans for the Lamb Canyon project as discussed. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, GREINER, INC. PACIFIC rank G. Castro, P.E. Project Manager FGC/U/L09809 Attachments xc: Ross Lew SECTION 1 : INTRODUCTION The Scope of Work is toprovide The Scope i Workde srto n to additional engineering services rnces to the Lamb Canyon ppoject and estimates for rock#'a]] mitigation. plan and additional gation. Three major engineering plans, special provisions tasks as shown below; Task 1 Project Management Task 2 Draft PS&E Task 3 Final PSBcE FIRM Greiner Rockfall litigation Design Converse Consultant GeoteChnical Engineering SECTION 2 : SCOPE OF WORK 2.1 Task 1- Project Management Consultant shall perform the following Project Management 2.1-1 Administration g ent services: standards and policies. 2•I -la Supervise, coordinate and monitor design for conformance with Caltrans' 2.1-1b Maintain project files. 2.1-1c Prepare, circulate and file correspondence and memos as appropriate. 2.1-1d Consultant shall attend design and O'Brien_Kreitzberg to accomplish proand ject adjudication meetings with RCTC, Caltrans 2.2 Task 2 - Draft PS&E Based on the Rock Bas dl the c and Mitestigation Report � C from Converse Consultants, develop90% Caltrans District and DOS reviews, design plans, 2.2-1 Draft Plans (90%) 2.2-1a Layout sheets for rock mitigation plans. Limits of the rock mitigation will (I'=100'), 2.2 -lb Revision to a cut slope at station sheet will be revised. will be prepared utilizin be shown. Four La g the approved geometry gout sheets are requires] 536+00 to reflect a new slope ratio. One grading 2.2 -lb Construction Detail sheets will prepared to show mitigation systems. Four Construction Detail sheets are the re qui red details of the rock 2.2-1c Special Provisions will be developed required. eveloped for technical requirements. 2.2-1d The quantity calculations, takeoffs and estimates will be prepared and independently checked. Deliverables for the Draft Submittal a) 5 copies ofPlans (half size) b) 5 copies of Special Provisions c) 5 copies of Cost Estimates 2.3 Task 3 - Final PS&E This phase incorporates comments from the Draft PS &E subm ittal and prepares Fine] PS&E for RCTC approval. 2.3-1 Final Plans (100%) �-3-1a Layout sheets, Construction Detail sheets, S e . updated with the incorporated Caltrans P oral provisions and Estimates will be comments. Deliverables for the Final Submittal : a) 5 copies of Plans (half size) • b) 5 copies of Special Provisions c) 5 copies of the Cost Estimates SECTION 3 : PROJECT SCHEDULE The product shall be delivered in accordance with the following schedule. AC A. Notice to Proceed DATE Report July 11, 1996 B. Completion of Rock Mitigation R C. Begin Work Jul 12 D. Draft Submittal y , 1996 E. Caltrans Review July 12, 1996 F Final Submittal Comments Due August 16, 1996 August 1, 1996 August 23, 1996 EXTRA WORK REQUEST DIRECT LABOR tots F. CASTRO R. LEW fosim PRINCIPAL PROJECT MANAGER Sli. PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER ENGINEER TECHNICIAN/CADD PROJECT AD MINISTRATOR CLERICAL TOTAL HOURS FRINGE BENEFITS OTHER COSTS TRAVEL COSTS REPRO DUCTION CA DD/COMPUTER IV9SC COSTS SUBCONSULTANTS SUBCONSULTANTFEE INDIRECT COSTS OVERHEAD & GENERAL FEE TOTAL CO ST, tctcoost. WK3 HOURS 0 16 32 140 O 140 48 0 378 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL lictusky $65,00 650.00 933.50 631.50 022.00 418.00 613.00 $17,00 T T AI 50 .00 $ 800.00 11,072 .00 $4,410.00 50.00 $2,520.00 $624,00 0.00 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS RBI 37,84% TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 61,000.00 63,000.00 40.00 80.00 BATE 5.00% TOTAL DIRECT COSTS aT 121. 03% TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS BR 10.50% T_ QTAL *3,566.80 40.00 SAL 111,413.00 69,426,00 43,568,80 44,000.00 411,413,00 12,582.81 130,968.41 PRINT DA 4 -Jun -88 AGENDA ITEM #6F DATE: TO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 3, 1996 Budget and Finance Committee Mike Davis, Environmental Manager Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director Approval of Amendment No. 3 (Scope Change # 10) for Greiner, Inc. for Conducting Rock Mitigation and, Preparing Revised Grading Plans for the Route 79 Lamb Canyon Project (Agreement No. RO 93-02) In a previous agenda item, the Commission considered the issue of providing rock fall mitigation and slope clean-up work for Route 79 (Lamb Canyon). Pending the Commission approval of the staff recommendations for that item, it is necessary to modify several consultant agreements to complete the necessary work. One such agreement is with Greiner, Inc. who is providing the design engineering required to complete the Lamb Canyon Project. Staff is recommending that Greiner, Inc. perform additional design services for the Route 79 Lamb Canyon Rock Fall Mitigation Project. These services included revision to a grading plan and additional engineering plans, special provisions and estimates for rockfall mitigation. These services are described in detail in the attached scope of work and are estimated to cost $30,968.41. The original Greiner, Inc. contract amount including Amendments 1 & 2 and extra work scope changes is presently $2,874,434.00 with $25,566.00 remaining in contingency. This Amendment (Amendment No. 3) will increase the total Greiner, Inc. contract amount from the $2,874,434.00 to $2,905,402.41. There will be no increase in the contingency amount. A standard contract amendment will be used amend Agreement RO 93-02. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve Amendment No. 3 to the Consultant Service Agreement RO 93-02 with Greiner, Inc. for additional engineering services in the amount of $30,968.41 for a revised contract base amount of $2,905,403. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement (No. RO 93-02) and Amendments 1&2 would remain in effect including the existing $25,556 remaining in extra work. :jw Attachment AGENDA ITEM #6G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment 6 to Agreement RO-9306 with Converse Consultants for Geotechnical Engineering Services for the Route 79, Gilman Springs Road to First Street Highway widening Project In a previous agenda item, the Commission considered the issue of providing rock fall mitigation and slope clean-up work for Route 79 (Lamb Canyon). Pending the Commission approval of the Staff recommendations for that item, it is necessary to modify several consultant agreements to complete the necessary work. One such agreement is with Converse Consultants who are providing the Geotechnical engineering required to complete the Lamb Canyon project. At the July 8, 1992 Commission meeting, RCTC approved Agreement RO-9306 with Converse Consultants to provide Geotechnical services for the Route 79, Measure A Highway Widening project extending from Gilman Springs Road to First Street in Beaumont. The following Table shows a history of the contract amendments for R09306. Amendment Description Amount Original Agreement - Gilman Springs Rd. to 1st Street July 8, 1992 $198,426 1 Refine design to reduce construction costs $97,420 2 Add Sanderson Ave Bridge Gilman Springs Grade Separation $20,561 3 Add construction support $60,000 4 Address Caltrans request for additional evaluation of cut slopes. $24,495 5 Reanalyze cut slope C-8 per Caltrans request and complete construction support $20,025 extra work misc authorized extra work $29,324 extra work 6(new) authorized to perform initial rock fall mitigation investigations Subtotal Authorized Work Rock Fall Mitigation/slope stability New Contract Value $20,000 $470,251 $17,890 $488,141 Attached is letter from Converse Consultants outlining their proposed scope of work to complete the rock fall mitigation work, provide construction support, and prepare final slope stability evaluations. The following is a summary of their request for additional funds to perform the extra services: Item 1 2 3 Description Amount Preparation of Rock Fall Mitigation Plan $20,010 Construction Monitoring $11060 Finalization of Slope Stability. Evaluations $6,820 Subtotal $37,890 Extra work previously authorized for this rock fall $20,000 mitigation work Required amount for new Amendment $17,890 Based on the above evaluation, Amendment 6 will require an amount of $17,890. Since all of the extra work has be utilized for this contract, Staff recommends that $5,000 of extra work be authorized for the new amendment in the event of any unforeseen additional work items. A standard contract amendment will be used to amend Agreement RO 93-06. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve Amendment 6 to Agreement RO 93-06 for "Geotechnical Services for Route 79 Gilman Springs Road to First Street Measure A Highway Widening Project" in the amount of $17,890 for a revised contract amount of $488,141 and have $5,000 authorized for possible future extra work. :jw Attachment A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of The Converse Professional Group Converse Consultants Orange County Celebrating 50 Years of Dedication in Engineering and Environmental Sciences June 7, 1996 Revised June 17, 1996 Mr. Jack Regan Director RCTC 3560 University Avenue, Ste. 100 Riverside, CA 92501 RECEIVED JUN 2 1 1996 B ide 0o(fce Subject: REQUEST FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. RO-9306." For Preparation of Rock Fall Mitigation "and Construction Monitoring Services State Highway 79 Road Widening between First Street and Gilman Springs Road Riverside County, California CCIE Project No. 92-81-436-05 Dear Mr. Regan: Converse Consultants Inland Empire (Converse) has prepared this le amendment to our Agreement No. RO-9306 for "Extra Work" in conjunction preparation of rock fall mitigation plans for various tier to request an cut slopes along ! d with (1) performing periodic construction monitoring during installation of oche roadway; drapery/fences, and • (2) (3) responding to comments from Ca!trans relative mitigation lope stability issues associated with regrading Cut Slope C-2 and stability comments g an ancient landslide adjacent to the roadway. Converse has been providing geotechnical observations services during final grading for accordance with Amendment No. 5 work and estimated fees for service during Marchgrading 13, 4 �9fi' the project in our Contract Amendment for Extra Work," Our anginal scope of were presented in Section 2.0 of dated May 12, 1994. As of March 1996, our total approved budget for this project (including Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). "Extra Work" under 5, for the amount of $20,pp0.Op could be oath f was $430,250.52 for t $450,250.52 under Section .0 3.12 of the Master hepndment total to authorized to bring the project to was earmarked for post construction/grading services to be provided ent. The ddby $20,000 Conversefor evaluation of rock fall mitigation on the following cut slopes, by for Converse Consultants Orange County 15245 Alton Parkway, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92718.2307 Telephone: (714) 453-2880 Facsimile: (714) 453.2888 Mr. Jack Regan, Director RCTC •CCIE Project No. 92-81-436-02 Rev. June 17, 1996 Page 2 Prior to authorization b Prior t mitigation evaluation by RCTC to proceed with the " onsrte and offsite meetings Converse was re Extra Work" satin quested by Mr. Joe Siino (Project theE rock fall ons to Approximately 36e hoursgs with Ca/trans t lest RE) of Principal Geologist to discuss rock attendto May 7 xim to y h conjunction with P eologist time has fall tmitigation. the rock fall been spent as of the mitigation program. end of According tO recent discussions with been requested Mr. Joe Siino and methodologies to to prepare a rock fall Mr. B+!! Hughes assist dologie t (Project rock fall hazards as discussed with , Converse has plan/report outlining for rock Greiner n (Project Civil Designer) with r th construction bid g the order eery, and preparation of construction personnel, to inset fences/drapery, anti, provide periodic construction order mitigation anticipated mid -Jul monitoring documents plan, we are requesting mid -July for corn services. !n immediate authorizationof the n of 0 rock fall The construction the $20,000. the installation and to be performed byrock Converse will consist of oversight of fence. B n discussions with various contractingfencing is of the companieseery; and the g approximately thedu , project for installation drapery/net/ install providing them 1 1/2 to 2 months. The of the monitoring services w' majority the first the time rock drapary�netl ill likely be within Converse will be k regard to the finalization month ❑f c associated with of re construction. ancient landslide regrading of Cut Slope associated e additional the ancient p C-2 and stability of the areas has stability for these road station 7 Y comments not been r areas. Finale 95 +Op, we expect to provid received by Caftrans as approval for the The following of this date. grading 9 presents a breakdown of The f allowingreport, the estimated and finalize Provide periodic rock fall mitigation costs to the stability gation construction monitoring prepare our rock Y evaluation for Cut Slope tall pe C-2 monitoring services, and the ancient landslide. CONVERSE Mr. Jack Regan, Director RCTC (3) (1) Preparation of Rock Fall Mitigation 9 tlon Plan SAa Categ0 . Principal -in -Charge Project Manager Project Professional Clerical/Drafting stiniated ioirrs: . 120 (2) Construction Monitoring Staff Category Principal -in -Charge Project Manager Project Professional Clerical/Drafting 10 40 64 E4KD❑ WN FOR EXTRA Estimated: Hours :>:::. 40 20 50 14 CCIE Project No. 92-81-436-02 Rev. June 17, 1996 Page 3 Unit Rate Mr) 110 105 80 40 TOTAL Unit .Rate.!si-r, .: Finalization of Slope Stability Evaluations Staff Category Principal -in -Charge Project Manager Project Professional Clerical/Drafting 170 105 80 40 COST BREAKDOWN FOR EXTRA > WORK Estimated. Hours' 40 4 20 10 TOTAL Unit Bate: {$/Fi^ 110 105 80 40 $ $ $ Total Cast 13,200 1,050 3,200 2,560 20,010 Total Cost 4,400 2,100 4,000 560 11,060 Total -Cost 4,400 420 1,600 Based 0 400 n the information TOTAL $ "Extra Work" presented above, 6,820 Bas as information in we request the meat " No. 6 presentedo Amendment No. 5, amount of $20,000 Amen bans. This cost our for and an jna for the lour contract the construction monitoring stab as evalua fie, Mr. Scott 36 hours of time g by slope th. .:ngrnesrs estimate/bid n' who wirr spent to date b stability parka prepare the mitigation Y the provide package and also plans Principal-in- C'CaNVERSE manage all a .provide input to aspects of the project. Mr. Jack Regan, Director RCTC CCIE Project N Rev The opportunity to be of continued service you have any questions, please vjce to RCTC on this contact Mr. Scott Ma project is Respectfully submitted, 9vrien at (714 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS ORANGE COUNTY D. Sco agorien Principal Geologist C.E.G. 1290 DSM:vy Dist: 2/Addressee 118ill Hughes (Fax 909/787-7920) o. 92-81-436-02 . June 17, 1996 Page 4 appreciated. If 1 453-2880. CONVERSE AGENDA ITEM #6H RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Mike Davis, Environmental Manager THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment No. 1 for Harris & Associates (Agreement No. RO 96-31) RCTC has requested that Harris & Associates (HA) provide Construction Management (CM) services for the Northmoor Noise Wall Project in Corona in addition to the CM services they are providing for the Yuma Drive/Interstate 15 (1-15) Interchange. RCTC approved the funding of the Northmoor Noise Wall Project on April 10, 1996 (Agenda Item 1062) in the amount of $425,000. It is anticipated that this project will be ready to bid in August 1996 which conforms with Harris & Associates CM work in Norco for the Yuma Drive/I-1 5 Interchange. Caltrans is unable to provide CM services for this project and, therefore, it was determined by RCTC staff that there would be significant time and cost savings to RCTC by having HA perform this work while they were also working on the Yuma Drive/I-15 Interchange. HA has proposed that they can complete this task in three months for $47,002.46. A brief description of the scope, schedule and cost are attached. RCTC staff has. also determined that the two (2) Ford Explorers owned by RCTC and previously used by O'Brien-Kreitzberg on the Route 79 Lamb Canyon project are now available for use for other construction projects., HA initially proposed an $800.00 per month fee for providing their own vehicles on the Yuma Drive/I-15 Interchange Project. In -lieu of this $800.00 monthly fee, it is now proposed that HA use the RCTC Ford Explorers. HA is amenable to this proposal and preliminary discussions on the transfer of vehicles from O'Brien-Kreitzberg is ongoing. Both of the Ford Explorers would be transferred to HA and registered under their company name for the duration of the Yuma Drive/I-15 Interchange Project, approximately 18 months. At the end of the construction period, both vehicles would be returned to RCTC. HA would be responsible for providing appropriate insurance and vehicle maintenance while the vehicles are in their name. The original HA contract amount that was approved by the Commission was $838,789.56 with $133,500 in contingency. This amendment (Amendment No. 1) would increase the total HA contract amount from $838,789.56 to $885,792.02. There would be no increase or change in the contingency amount. Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission: 1) Authorize Amendment No. 1 to the Construction Management Service Agreement (No. RO 96-31) with Harris & Associates (HA) to cover the additional services necessary to construct the Northmoor. Noise. Wall Project for a period of approximately three months (3) from August 1, 1996 to October 31, 1996 for an amount not -to -exceed $47,002.46. The total HA contract amount would increase from $838,789.56 to $885,792.02. There will be no change in the contingency amount associated with Amendment No. 1; and, 2) Authorize that Harris & Associates (HA) use the two (2) Ford Explorers presently owned by RCTC. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement (Agreement No. RO 96-31) would remain in effect. :jw Attachment AGENDA ITEM #7A DATE: TO: FROM: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 3, 1996 Budget and Finance Committee Cathy Bechtel, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: FY 1997 FTA Section 5307 Program of Projects Annually, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) distributes federal operating and capital block grant funds to urbanized areas through its Section 5307 Program (formerly known as Section 9). There are four urbanized areas in Riverside County: Western Riverside County; Hemet; Palm Springs; and Indio/Coachella. In order for grants from these funds to be approved, the Commission must develop a Program of Projects for each area, hold a public hearing on the programs, and approve the programs. Program of Projects for the four areas in Riverside County have been developed using the FY 1995-96 area apportionments. Total FTA Section 5307 funding estimated to be available is $9,536,761 for bus operators and $5,800,428 for rail. The actual amount may be less, but we will not know for sure until the final appropriations are made by Congress. Programming at the highest anticipated amount allows the operators to proceed with filing their grant applications and will avoid delays, program amendments and additional paperwork if the actual apportionments are in fact lower than estimated. The proposed Programs of Projects contain projects taken from the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for FY 1997-2003 which the Commission approved last month. The programs were developed in cooperation with the eligible public transit operators. The balances available in the four areas are capital funds which will be carried over to next fiscal year. As required, a notice of the public hearing was published in the newspaper ten days prior to this meeting and private transit operators have been provided a copy of each program, advised of the hearing and encouraged to comment on the programs. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve the proposed FY 1997 FTA Section 5307 Program of Projects for Riverside County. :jw PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 (formerly Section 9) FY 1996/97 URBANIZED AREA: BUS APPORTIONMENT: RAIL APPORTIONMENT: CARRYOVER FUNDS -BUS: CARRYOVER FUNDS -RAIL: TRANSFER FUNDS -BUS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -BUS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAIL -RAIL: RECIPIENTS: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY CITY OF CORONA CITY OF RIVERSIDE PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO 03,356,438 02,186,298 02,923,210 $3,614,130 01,185,800 07,465,448 $5,800,428 SUBAREA APPORTIONMENTS TOTAL AMOUNT (1) RTA OPERATIONS ASSISTANCE 019,496,267 JULY 1, 1996 TO JUNE 30, 1997 (2) CITY OF CORONA- 2 REPLACEMENT VANS $140,000 (3) CITY OF RIVERSIDE -OFFICE EQUIPMENT $25,000 (4) CITY OF RIVERSIDE- 4 REPLACEMENT VAN $188,000 (5) RTA- PURCHASE RADIO COMMUNICATION 01,534,000 EQUIPMENT -REPLACEMENT (6) RTA-11 REPLACEMENT SERVICE SUPPORT VEHICLES (7) RTA - 6 REPLACEMENT DAR VEHICLES (8) RTA - DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT FOR TRANSIT COACHES (9) RTA - OFFICE EQUIPMENT $82,000 (10) RTA-SHOP EQUIPMENT $70,000 (11) RTA - OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT $180,000 (12) RTA - COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL $200,000 ANALYSIS (13) RTA - RIVERSIDE TROLLEY OPERATING ASSISTANCE (CMAQ PROJECT) (14) RTA-3 REPLACEMENT CNG BUSES (CMAQ) (15) RTA-14 PARTICULATE TRAPS (CMAQ) TOTAL PROGRAMMED BALANCE AVAILABLE -BUS BALANCE AVAILABLE -RAIL Approved by RCTC: 0350,400 0230,000 $1,050,000 $929,250 $30,000 $26,550 $23,249,667 03,947,102 33,518,346 05,800,428 $264,000 $192,000 $300,000 $40,000 $420,000 $268,800 $3,666,702 $112,000 $168,400 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT $327,302 0 SCAG $112,000 C SCAG $18,000 C SCAG $150,400 C SCAG 01,227,200 C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG C SCAG $65,600 C SCAG $56,000 C SCAG $144,000 C SCAG $160,000 C SCAG 0 SCAG C SCAG C SCAG CRB:6/25/96 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 (formerly Section 9) FY 1996/97 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET APPORTIONMENT $604,950 CARRYOVER FUNDS: $363,048 TRANSFER FUNDS: $0 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $967,998 RECIPIENTS: SUBAREA APPORTIONMENTS RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY $605,298 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT (1) RTA OPERATING ASSISTANCE $19,496,000 $195,698 0 STATE JULY 1, 1996 TO JUNE 30, 1997 (2) RTA-Purchase 11 Support Vehicles $264,000 $19,200 C STATE (3) RTA-Purchase 6 Replacement Vans $300,000 $200,000 C STATE (4) RTA-Debt Service Payment for $420,000 $67,200 C STATE Transit Coaches (5) RTA-Purchase 7 Replacement $154,000 $123,200 C STATE Wheelchair Lifts TOTAL PROGRAMMED $20,634,000 $605,298 BALANCE AVAILABLE $362,700 APPROVED BY RCTC: PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 (formerly Section 9) FY 1996/97 URBANIZED AREA: PALM SPRINGS APPORTIONMENT: $722,306 CARRYOVER FUNDS: $6,233 TRANSFER FUNDS: $0 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $728,539 RECIPIENTS: SUBAREA APPORTIONMENTS SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY $665,000 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT (1) SUNLINE OPERATING ASSISTANCE $9,200,000 $200,000 0 STATE JULY 1, 1996 TO JUNE 30, 1997 (2) SUNLINE LEASE/PURCHASE $700,000 $385,000 C STATE REPLACEMENT TRANSIT COACHES (3) SUNLINE NON -REVENUE VEHICLE $50,000 $40,000 C STATE (4) SUNLINE TWO (2) REPLACEMENT $100,000 $40,000 C STATE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES TOTAL PROGRAMMED $9,950,000 $665,000 BALANCE AVAILABLE $63,539 APPROVED BY RCTC: CRB: 6/17/96 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 (formerly Section 9) FY 1996/97 URBANIZED AREA: APPORTIONMENT: CARRYOVER FUNDS: TRANSFER FUNDS: TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: RECIPIENTS: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY PROGRAM OF PROJECTS: (1) SUNLINE OPERATING ASSISTANCE JULY 1, 1996 TO JUNE 30, 1997 (2) SUNLINE LEASE/PURCHASE REPLACEMENT TRANSIT COACHES TOTAL PROGRAMMED BALANCE AVAILABLE APPROVED BY RCTC: CRB: 6/21/96 INDIO/COACHELLA $365,797 $8,979 $0 $374,776 TOTAL AMOUNT $9,200,000 $700,000 $9,900,000 SUBAREA APPORTIONMENTS $365,000 FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT $200,000 0 $165,000 C $365,000 $9,776 STATE STATE AGENDA ITEM #7B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Jerry Rivera, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: FY 1996-97 Local Transportation Fund Allocations for Transit In order for the public transit operators to claim Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for operating and capital purposes, the Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in the approved FY 1997-2003 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The Riverside County SRTP for all public transit operators in Riverside County was reviewed and approved by the Commission at their meeting on June 12, 1996. The FY 1997 Short Range Transit Plans for all operators were approved as presented with the exception of the City of Rancho Mirage. The City of Rancho Mirage had planned for an increase of 57% (+ $27,890) over the approved 1996 funding level to cover an anticipated higher ridership level for FY 1997. However, since the other provider in the area, SunLine Transit, has had to cut their dial -a -ride services to seniors and disabled due to funding constraints, the Citizens Advisory Committee recommended and the Commission approved that the funding level for the City remain status quo ($49,000). At the February 14, 1996 Commission meeting, the FY 1996-97 Local Transportation Funds were apportioned to the three apportionment areas: Western Riverside, Coachella Valley, and the Palo Verde Valley area. The apportionments for the three areas were $20,357,126; $5,889,585, and $417,325, respectively. In addition, an estimated $1,068,000 in apportioned but unclaimed funds are available in the Western County area for transit services. The FY 1997 LTF allocations for the transit operators are consistent with the approved SRTP. Carry-over funds used in these calculations are preliminary estimates and may change. Any modifications in fare box revenue, federal grants, Measure A funding or carry-over funds may require the operator(s) to revise their services to operate within the LTF funding limitations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve the FY 1996-97 LTF Allocations for Transit in Riverside County as shown on the attached table. :jw Attachment FY 1996-97 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND ALLOCATIONS F OR TRANSIT TRANSIT OPERATOR ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTI MATED ESTIMATED OPERATING CAPITAL TOTAL CARRYOVER N ON LTF C OSTS COSTS COSTS FUNDS REVENUES BANNING BEAUMONT CORONA RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES* RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY M ETROLINK (1) WESTERN COUNTY TOTAL RANCHO MIRAGE SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY COACHELLA VALLEY TO TAL PALO VERDE VALLEY T. A. PALO VERDE VALLEY TOTAL COUNTY TOTAL RECOMMENDED LTF TRANSIT ALLOCATION $498,000 $50,000 $548,000 $8,700 $145,143 $505,800 $4,000 $509,800 $0 $82,372 $509,800 $172,000 $681,800 $0 $221,772 $1,282,100 $213,000 $1,495,100 $0 $367,587 $19,496,267 $3,203,756 $22,700,023 $0 $8,089,398 $3.980.007 $1.599.506 $5.579 .513 $Q 81 .779.328 $26,271,974 $5,242,262 $31,514,236 $8,700 $10,685,600 $49,000 $0 $49,000 $0 $9,800 $9.200.000 $1 .532 .250 $10 .732 .250 $285.000 $5.232.000 $9,249,000 $1,532,250 $10,781,250 $285,000 $5,241,800 $394,157 $427,428 $460,028 $1,127,513 $14,610,625 $3 .800.185 $20,819,936 $39,200 $5.215.250 $5,254,450 $112.338 80 $112 .338 $20 .038 $12.100 $112,338 $0 $112,338 $20,038 $12,100 $80 .200 $80,200 $35,633,312 $6,774,512 $42,407,824 8313,738 $15,939,500 * Includes $100,000 for Transportatio n Terminal funded through STA funds . (1) Operating co sts net of revenues. JR: 06127196 826,154,586 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: Request from RTA to Reprogram Local Transportation Funds The Riverside Transit Agency has identified $168,206 in excess local transportation capital funds left over from completed capital projects. They are requesting Commission's approval to reprogram these funds to new capital projects. Staff is still in the process of reviewing the request for new capital projects and, as such, will provide a final report at the Committee meeting. :jw AGENDA ITEM #7D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Cathy Bechtel, Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: FY 1997 FTA Section 5311 Rural Transportation Program The Section 5311 Rural Transit Assistance Program from the Federal Transit Administration, formerly known as Section 18, provides federal operating assistance funds for rural transit operators. These funds are administered by Caltrans and the majority of the funds are passed through to counties based on a population formula. The remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program by Caltrans for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs. Transit operators in counties where formula funds are fully programmed may submit projects for discretionary funding to Caltrans. In order for grants to be approved, the Commission must develop and approve a Program of Projects. The attached program was prepared using FY 1995-96 funding level for operations. As with the Section 5307 program (Section 9), the actual apportionments may be lower but will not be known until after the start of our fiscal year. By programming at what may be a higher level of funding, the operators will be able to apply for maximum funding and avoid delays and additional work to amend programs and grants. FORMULA PROGRAM: The proposed program allocates the estimated $287,000 in formula funds for Riverside County in FY 1996-97 to the RTA (61.7% or $177,079) and SunLine Transit Agency (38.3% or $109,921). This is the formula that the Commission has used in past years and is based on estimates of rural population. Each operator has planned for the use of Section 5311 operating funds in their Short Range Transit Plan. DISCRETIONARY FUNDS: SunLine Transit Agency has applied for discretionary Section 5311 intercity funds to support the purchase of bus shelters to be used in rural areas. Total discretionary funds being applied for by SunLine are $120,000. The City of Banning will be applying for discretionary funds totaling $38,000 for the purchase of a replacement dial -a -ride vehicle. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve the proposed FY 1996-97 FTA Section 5311 Program of Projects for Riverside County. :jw RIVERSIDE COUNTY FTA SECTION 5311 PROGRAM (formerly Section 18) FY 1997 FORMULA FUNDS * COUNTY RTA SUNLINE (100%) (61.7%) (38.3%) FED FUNDS AVAILABLE: $287,000 $177,079 $109,921 CARRYOVER: $0 $0 $0 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABL $287,000 $177,079 $109,921 STATE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS AGENCY PROJECT FEDERAL FUNDS TOTAL AMT. City of Banning Purchase of One Replacement 12 Psgr. $38,000 $47,000 Van w/Lift and Tiedowns SunLine Transit Agency Rural Shelter Project $120,000 $150,000 * Formula funds were programmed at the FY 1996 level for planning purposes. The actual apportionment will be shared by the operators using the above percentages. APPROVED BY RCTC: CB: 6/12/96 AGENDA ITEM #7E July 3, 1996 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Dean Martin, Chief Financial Officer Cathy Bechtel, Program Manager II SUBJECT: Grant Close -Out Process for Transit Operators Ernst & Young included the following comment in,their October 11, 1995 Management Letter to the Commission: We have observed that transit operators usually receive Transportation Development Act (TDA) capital grant funds in advance of actual expenditures and that recipients are not required to report on the status of the grants. As a result, we have noted amounts that have expired or have been used for other capital projects, requiring subsequent approval from the Commission. We recommend that the Commission review its TDA capital grant process to determine whether funds should be disbursed on a reimbursement basis and to establish a periodic grant reporting and close-out process. The Commission should consider using the funding and reporting process established by the Federal Transit Administration. Implementation of such procedures would ensure that funds are spent as intended and are available for priority projects. Staff will be meeting with the transit operators over the next month to discuss this issue. Staff believes a workable solution is to establish a "rapid" reimbursement procedure for all capital grants. The Commission would no longer issue funds for capital purposes in one lump sum payment prior to actual acquisition of the capital equipment. The details will be negotiated with transit operators and will be brought to the Commission for approval once completed. As Commission staff is discussing this proposal with transit operators, staff proposes to delay any TDA capital disbursements until this issue has been resolved and a policy adopted by the Commission (anticipated to be in August). Staff does not believe that this will exert a hardship on any agency, as capital funds are not typically disbursed at the beginning of the fiscal year. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission authorize staff to delay capital disbursements until the issue of capital grants close-out has been resolved. :jw AGENDA ITEM #7F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: David Ledwitz, Staff Analyst I THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: FY 1996-97 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Recommended Funding Allocations In April, the Commission authorized staff to solicit eligible applications for bicycle and pedestrian projects to be funded as part of the Commission's FY 1996-97 SB 821 Program. In response to the Request For Proposals, the Commission received 52 project proposals from 17 eligible applicant agencies. Forty-five of the applications are for sidewalk projects. The remaining seven projects are for bikeway projects. The total request for SB 821 funds equals $1,817,794. This year, $ 544,164 is available for allocation. The Commission's SB 821 Evaluation Committee is scheduled to meet to review and prioritize the projects on June 26, 1996. The Evaluation Committee is composed of three members from both the Commission's Technical Advisory Committee (Dave Gunderman, WRCOG; Ken Lobeck, CVAG; and Ray Meijer, Caltrans) and Citizens Advisory Committee (John Lonberg, Lori Nickel, and Lucia Moran). A list of the 52 project applications received by Commission staff is attached. The project applications are listed in alphabetical order by sponsoring agency. The listing does not present a prioritization of the projects. All applicant agencies have been invited to give a brief presentation on their proposed projects at the Evaluation Committee meeting. Each applicant agency will be provided time to make their presentations and respond to questions asked by members of the Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee will rank each project proposal submitted by the applicant agencies according to the Commission's adopted scoring criteria (Attachment II). The ranked list of projects and a funding recommendation will be presented at the Commission's Budget and Finance Committee meeting. STAFF AND THE SB 821 EVALUATION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission approve the recommendation of the SB 821 Evaluation Committee for FY 1996-97 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program totalling $ 544,164 to be handed out at the meeting. :jw FY 1996/97 SB 821 E VAL UATION COMMITTEE R ECOMMENDE D ALLOC ATI ONS T OTAL AGENCY PROJECT DiSC RI PTIO N COST 1 MORENO VALLEY ACCESSIBILITY EN HANCEMENT ON COTTONWOOD AVE $6,000 2 MOREN O VALLEY SIDEW ALK F OR C ACTUS AVE/INDIA N ST INTERSECTI ON $22,000 3 LA QUINTA CALLE T AMPIC O BICYCLE AND PED SAFE ROUTE $60,000 4 TEMECU LA SIDEWAL K ON MARGARITA R D, WEST OF MORAGA RD $27,800 5 CA LIMESA S OLES AN D WHEELS V - 2N D ST SIDEWALK $17,300 6 BANNING WILSON ST SW IMPROVEMENTS- HIGHLAN D SPRI NGS $18,000 7 MORENO VALLEY SIDEWALK F OR HID DEN SPRINGS DRIVE (SO UTH) $18,000 8 RIVERSIDE FOURTEENT H ST W HEELCHAIR RAMPS $31,000 9 BA NNING ALESSANDRO RO AD SIDEW ALK IMPROVEME NT $12,000 10 BANNING MURRAY ST SIDEWAL K IMP ROVEME NT $12,000 11 CATHED RAL CITY EAST PALM CANYON, EL DORA DO TO CREE RO AD $16,750 12 RIVERSIDE GOLD EN A VE- GRAMERCY PL ACE TO LA VERNE DR . $105,000 13 BEAUMONT BICY CLE AND PED ESTRIAN FACILITIES [2ND YR] $172,256 14 CO ACHELLA SECO ND STREET $40,230 15 IND IO D ILLO N AVENUE (PALO VERDE TO J ACKSO N) $25,300 16 RIVERSIDE IND IAN A A VE- LA SIERRA AV E TO METR OLINK ST A. $25,000 17 HEMET SANDER SON AVEN UE BICY CLE LANE EXTENSI ON $98,000 18 TEMECU LA SIDEWA LK ON CO SMIC DRIVE $47,100 19 MORENO VALLEY SIDEWALK FOR KALMIA AVENUE $38,000 20 COACH ELLA THIRD STR EET $47,883 21 P DESERT/R MIRAGE MO NTEREY AVENU E BIK ELANE/SIDEWALK $275.042 TOTAL= 51.114.661 SB 821 FUN DS REQ UE STED SB 821 FUN DS RECOMMEN DED $3,000 $3,000 $11,000 $11,000 $25,000 $25,000 $21,000 $21,000 $12,245 $12,245 $13,500 $13,500 $9,000 $9,000 $15,500 $15,500 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 $11,725 $11,725 $52,500 $52,500 $96,894 $96,894 $36,207 $36,207 $22,000 $22,000 $12,500 $12,500 $88,000 $88,000 537,600 $37,600 $19,000 $19,000 $43,094 $43,094 $225.042 $68.789 5772.807 $616.854 DLISBB2IRKA 02 -Jul -96 .iL# NAZI VGNa V OZ INaNHJVZZV SB 821 EVALUATION CRITERIA FACTOR 1. USE The extent of potential use of a bicycle or pedestrian facility is the most important factor. Emphasis of this factor helps ensure the greatest benefits will be derived from the expenditure of SB 821 funds. Relative usage is to be derived from analysis of trip generators and attractors adjacent to the project. 2. SAFETY Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to correct current safety problems. 3. IMPORTANCE AS A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE Points are awarded on the basis of a project's potential to attract users who would otherwise use an automobile. 4. MISSING LINK, EXTENSION OR CONNECTIVITY Points are awarded to projects that link existing facilities or are extensions of, or potentially connect to, existing facilities. 5. MATCHING FUNDS This factor is used to help ensure that there is local funding participation in the project - not just a application for "free" money. One point is awarded for each 5% of total project cost that is financed by the local agency. (Maximum 10 points.) 6. POPULATION EQUITY. The purpose of this factor is to help ensure that one agency does not receive all the funds. The applicant receives the maximum 10 points if the amount of funds requested does not exceed what the applicant would receive if the funds were allocated by population. Year to year totals are recorded so that an applicant could build up a "credit". 7. ELIMINATION OF BARRIERS TO ACCESSIBILITY The purpose of this factor is to enhance the physical accessibility of existing facilities. Applicant agencies may receive up to 10 "bonus points" for their project proposals which improve physical access to existing facilities. RCTC: 4/12/95 MAXIMUM POINTS 25 20 20 15 10 10 10 PPIDL\SB821 CRI SE 821 FY96/97 APPLIC ATION LIST DUSB821E VL 28 -J un -96 # AGENCY PR OJECT DISCRIPTION SB821 REQ UEST LOC MATCH TOTCOST %M ATCH 1 BANNING WILSON ST SW IMPROVEMENTS- HIGHLAND SPRINGS $13,500 $4,500 $18,000 25.00% 2 B ANNI NG R OBERGE AVE SIDEWALK IMPR OVEME NT $12,000 $4,000 $16,000 25 .00% 3 BANNING GENEVA AVE SIDEW ALK IMPROVEMENT $9,000 $3,000 $12,000 25 .00% 4 BANNING ALESS ANDRO RO AD SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT $9,000 $3,000 $12,000 25.00% 5 BANNING MURRA Y ST SIDEWAL K IMPRO VEMENT $9,000 $3,000 $12,000 25.00% 6 BA NNING WILS ON ST SIDEWALK IMPRO VEMENT (NORTH SIDE) $9.000 83.000 812.000 25.00% A GENCY TOT AL = 861,500 820,500 882,000 25.00% 7 BEAUMONT 8 CALIMESA BICYCLE AN D PE DESTRIA N FACILITIES [2ND YR] 896.894 $75362 8172.256 43.75% AGENCY TOT AL = $96,894 875,362 5172,256 43.75% SOLES AND WHEELS V - 2N D ST SIDEWALK 812.245 85,055 $17.300 29 22% A GEN CY T OTAL = 812,245 55 .055 517,30Q 29 ,?2% 9 CATHEDRAL C ITY EAST PALM CANY ON, EL D ORAD O TO CREE R OAD $11,725 $5,025 $16,750 30.00% 10 CA TH EDRAL CITY WHITEWA TER BIKE TR AIL $23,346 $57,036 $80,382 70 .96% 11 CA THED RAL CITY VISTA CHINO SIDEWALK (A.D . 96-1) 820,884 88.950 829.834 30.00% AGENCY TOT AL = S55,955 871.011 8126.966 5593% 12 CO ACH ELLA SECON D STREET $36,207 $4,023 $40,230 10 .00% 13 CO ACHELLA THIRD STREET $43,094 $4,789 $47,883 10.00% 14 CO ACHELLA FOURTH STREET 839,626 $4.403 $44.029 10 .00°/Q AGENCY TOTAL = 5118,927 813,215 8132,142 10 .00% 15 CORONA FOO THILL BIKEWAY (LINCOLN TO TAYLER) $72,000 $18,000 $90,000 20.00% 16 CORONA BU ENA VISTA SIDEWALK PROJECT $26,000 $0 $26,000 0.00% 17 CORONA E. G RAND BETWEEN- THIRD ST AND SECOND ST $18,500 $0 $18,500 0.00% 18 CORONA SH ERIDAN STREET N ORTH OF SIXT H ST SW PRO JECT $6.600 $Q $6 .600 0.00°/Q AG ENCY TOTAL = $123,100 $18,000 8141,100 12.76% 19 DESERT HO T SPRINGS MIRA CLE HILL PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT $38,160 $0 $38,160 0.00% 20 DESERT HOT SPRINGS WEST DRIVE $81,120 $0 $81 ,120 0 .00% 21 D ESERT HO T SPRIN GS PA LM DRIVE PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT 865.280 $Q $65.280 0.00% AG ENCY TO TA L = $184,560 10 $184,560 0.00% PAGE 2 kN AGENCY 22 HE MET 23 HEMET 24 INDIO PROJECT DISCRIPTION SAN DERSON AVENUE BICYCLE L ANE EXTENSION HARRISON AVE NUE BICYCLE LANE E XTENSION AGENCY TOTAL = S ONORA AVENUE (P AL O VERDE TO JACKSON) 25 INDIO DILLON AVENUE (PALO VERDE TO JACKSON) AGENCY TOTAL = 26 LAKE ELSINORE 27 LA QUINTA 28 MORENO VALLEY 29 MORENO VA LLEY 30 MORENO VA LLEY 31 MORENO V ALLEY KELL OGG STREET/SUMNER AVEN UE SI DEWALK AGEN CY TOTAL = CALLE T AMPICO BICYCLE AND PED SAFE ROUTE AGENCY TOTAL = SID EWALK F OR CACTUS AVE/IN DI AN ST INTERSECTION ACCESSIBILITY E NHA NCEMENT ON COTTO NWO OD A VE SIDEWALK FOR HIDDEN SPRI NGS DRIVE (SOUTH) SID EWA LK FOR KALMIA AVE NUE AGENCY TOTAL 32 PALM D ESERT/R MIRA GE MONTEREY AVENUE BIKELANE/SI DEWALK AGENCY TOTAL = 33 PALM SPRINGS 34 RIV ERSID E 35 RIVERSID E 36 RIVERSIDE 37 RIV ERSIDE 38 RIVERSIDE 39 RIVERSIDE TAHQUITZ CREEK BIKEWA Y MISSING LINK AGENCY T OTAL = GOLDEN A VE- ORAMERCY PLA CE TO LA VERNE DR. INDIANA AVE- LA SIERRA AVE TO METROLINK STA. FO URTEENTH ST WHEELCHAIR RAMPS A RLING TO N AVE WHEELCHAIR RAMPS CALIFORN IA AVE SIDEWALK- MONROE TO ADAMS ARLING TON AVE- EL PRADO ST TO EL HIJO ST AG ENCY TOTAL = DLISB821EVL 24 -Jun -96 SB82 I REQUEST L OC MATCH TOTCOST % MATCH 1 588,000 517,000 S105,000 522,000 522,000 544,000 532,400 510,000 52,000 S12,000 S3,300 53,300 S6,600 53,600 S32,400 S3,600 525,000 535,000 525,000 535,000 511,000 53,000 59,000 519,000 542,000 511,000 53,000 59,000 519,000 542,000 598,000 519,000 S117,000 525,300 525 ,300 S50,600 10.20% 10.53% 10 .26% 13.04% 13.04% 13.04% 536,000 10.00% 536,000 10.00% 560,000 58 .33% 560,000 58 .33% 522,000 56,000 518,000 538,000 584,000 50.00% 50 .00% 50 .00% 50 .00% 50 .00% 5225,042 550,000 5275,042 18 .18% 5225,042 S50,000 5275,042 18.18% 561,971 515,493 S61,971 515,493 552,500 512,500 515,500 523,000 525,000 39,000 S137,500 552,500 512,500 515,500 S23,000 525,000 59,000 S137,500 577,464 20.00% 577,464 20 .00% 5105,000 525,000 531,000 546,000 550,000 518,000 S275,000 50.00% 50.00% 50 .00% 50 .00% 50.00% 50 .00% 58.00% PA GE 3 �I4 AGENCY 40 RIV COUNTY/TEMECULA 41 RIVERSIDE COU NT Y 42 RIVERSIDE C OUNTY 43 RIVERSIDE CO UNTY 44 RIVERSIDE CO UNTY 45 RIVCOUNTY/CORONA 46 RIV ERSIDE COU NTY 47 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 48 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 49 TEMECULA 50 TEMECULA 51 TEMECULA 52 TEMECULA PROJECT DISCRIPTION SA NTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PED RAMP AT WINCH BRD LEMO N ST ASPH ALT WALKWAY FOR J HAYMAN SCHL OPAL ST SIDEWALK F OR RUBIDOUX HI GH SCHO OL PERALTA PL ACE SIDEWALK AT PERALTER ELEM SCHL RATHKE DR SW RUSTIC LANE ELEMENTARY SCH OOL SERFAS CLUB DRIVE, WEST - SIDEW ALK COLUMBIA ST ASPHALT W ALKWAY FOR ROM ONA SCHL D ARTM OUTH MIDDLE SCHO OL SI DEWALK AIRP ORT BLVD & PALM STREET SI DEWALKS f or J KELLEY SCH AGEN CY TOTAL = SIDEW ALK ON M ARGARIT A RD, WEST OF M ORA GA RD SIDEWALK ON COSMIC DRIVE SIDEWALK ON AGE NA STREET SIDEWALK ON S OUTHERN CR OSS ROAD A GENCY TOTAL = DUSB821 EVL 24 -Jun -96 513821 REQ UEST LOC MATCH TOTCOST % MATCH] $140,000 $7,500 $20,000 $20,000 $27,500 $55,000 $5,500 $35,000 577,000 5387,500 $21,000 $37,600 $37,600 $8,000 S104,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 514,000 56,800 $9,500 $9,500 $2,000 S27,800 $140,000 $7,500 $20,000 $20,000 $27,500 $55,000 55,500 535,000 591,000 S401,500 $27,800 547,100 547,100 S10,000 S132,000 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 .00% 0 .00% 15 .38% 3.49% 24 .46% 20.17% 20.17% 20.00% 21.06% T OTAL = $1,817,794 $547,136 $2,364,91 AGENDA ITEM #8A DATE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Mike Davis, Project Coordinator THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Approval of Amendment 1 to Agreement RO 93-23 for Resolution of Request for Addition Design Fees for Huitt-Zollars work on the final design of the West Corona Commuter Rail Station The Commission entered into Agreement No. RO 93-23 with Huitt-Zollars on November 16, 1992. Huitt-Zollars was to provide Preliminary Engineering, Environmental Clearance, Final PS&E Design, and assist in advertisement for construction of the West Corona Commuter Rail Station. Their Base Contract was for $305,932. with an extra work allowance of $56,731. Huitt-Zollars received authorization to provide $54,792 of extra work on the project to provide NEPA environmental clearance, to add a second platform, to add a joint access driveway with the adjacent property owner, and other miscellaneous items. These Commission actions resulted in an increase of Huitt-Zollars base contract to $360,724 with a remaining extra work allowance of $1,939. During the course of constructing the West Corona Station, Staff identified several construction change orders, which in their opinion, were the direct result of errors in the design drawings. These design error related change orders resulted in additional cost to RCTC for completion of the project. These design error related change orders and their respective cost were outlined in a letter from RCTC to Huitt-Zollars, dated January 11, 1996. The associated costs related to these design errors totalled to $33,397. RCTC is currently withholding payment of this amount to Huitt-Zollars. Near the completion of the construction of the West Corona Station, Huitt-Zollars verbally indicated to Staff that they had provided services above and beyond that outlined in the scope of work in their contract. On January 19, 1996, Huitt-Zollars submitted an extra work request to cover these additional services. The following is a breakdown of the additional cost: Additional Design Services Construction Support Services $ 71,293 $ 36,542 $107,835 Staff and Huitt-Zollars met in several meetings to negotiate what services provided by Huitt-Zollars were additional and the respective costs that can be justified to be the Page 2 responsibility of the Commission. In addition, Staff and Huitt-Zollars negotiated which construction change orders were design related and what was Huitt-Zollars respective share in the cost of those change orders. Staff and Huitt-Zollars came to a negotiated agreement respecting the additional services and the design related change orders, which is summarized in a letter dated June 6, 1996 from .Huitt-Zollars, and outlined below Additional Services Change Order Backcharges Required Amendment Amount $31,928.75 -$16,928.75 $15, 000.00 Under the proposal for closing this matter, Huitt-Zollars would receive all of the monies due them in the original Agreement ($360,724.20) and a negotiated amount of $15,000 to cover the additional design and construction support services minus the amount deducted for design related change orders, for a total not to exceed $375,724.20. With Huitt-Zollars acceptance of this negotiated fee settlement, a final amendment will be prepared by Staff to close out Agreement No. RO-93-23 for an amount not to exceed $375,724.20. There will be no further requests by Huitt-Zollars or actions required by the Commission concerning this agreement. A standard amendment form will be used for this agreement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Commission authorize the approval of amendment 1 to Agreement No. RO 93-23 between RCTC and Huitt-Zollars. The total contract amount would be increased by $15,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $375,724.20. This amendment will represent the final action necessary by the Commission to closeout the agreement (Agreement No. RO 93-23) with Huitt-Zollars. :jw " 1  I i ����' I r..�� 027042 Huill-Zoliars. Inc. / 15101 Red Hill Avenue / Tustin. California 92680 / Phone (7141259-7900 / Fax (714) 259-0210 June 6, 1996 Karl Sauer, Project Coordinator RCTC/Bechtel 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92501 SUBJECT: WEST CORONA COMMUTER RAIL STATION; HZI PROJECT NO. 06-0052-00 Dear Mr. Sauer: RECEIVED JUN 1 0 1996 BECHTEL CORP. Riverside Office In response to our recent telephone conversations, this letter serves to bring all the issues related to the subject project to closure. Below is an itemized list of the consultants and the amounts they have been allocated for extra work on this project. A breakdown of the items and consultant allocations is also listed for your review and approval. Firm Approved Contract Amount. Revised Addendum Requested New Total HOK NBS/Lowry RWR/Pascoe $59,871.28 54,551.15 12,022.42 $8,250 0 0 $68,121.28 54,551.15 12,022.42 Yvonne Neal DKS 24,867.56 28,140.81 0 0 Ninyo & Moore Huitt-Zollars TOTAL 8,571.17 0 172,699.81 6,750 $360,724.20 $15,000.00 24,867.56 28,140.81 8,571.17 179,449.81 $375,724.20 Dailas / Fort Worth / Houston / El Paso / Phoenix i Tustin I (lntsrin / Can Mr. Karl Sauer HZI Project No. 06-0052-00 June 6, 1996 Page 2 of 3 ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES • Revise kiosk and canopies to mission style • Include windscreens • Include flushseam panel system/4 column design • Revise entry kiosk location for access ramp • Revise location of the pedestrian gate to west end • Revise parking lot layout for access issues • Revise landscape plans per ARCO comments ■ Construction Support GRAND TOTAL Additionally, you indicated that RCTC had accepted our backcharges noted in Paul BIackwelder's letter of January please release the balance of monies being held in antic HOK Huitt-Zollars HOK Huitt-Zollars HOK Huitt-Zollars HOK Huitt-Zollars RWR Pascoe NB S/Lowry HOK Huitt-Zollars RWR Pascoe NBS/Lowry HOK Huitt-Zollars RWR Pascoe NBS/Lowry HOK Huitt-Zollars Huitt-Zollars $ 2,000 0 $ 2,000 $ 1,000 0 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,000 250 0 0 $ 1,250 $ 250 1,500 0 0 $ 1,750 $ 0 1,000 0 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 250 $ 2,250 S 3.75Q $ 3,750 $ 15,000 offer of $16,468.42 for the 11, 1996. If that is correct, ipation of closure on these Mr. Karl Sauer HZI Project No. 06-0052-00 June 6, 1996 Page 3 of 3 backcharge issues. There is $33,397.17 being held so the amount that can be issued to us is $16,928.75. Should you need anything to facilitate the release of these funds, do not hesitate to contact me directly. If these amounts and allocations appear acceptable, please forward an approval to my attention. After receiving approval, I will revise the backup calculation of the fees and officially request the contract addendum for engineering and architectural services. Should you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, HUITT-ZOLLARS, INC. TU.' . Caldwell Vice President mitusi06-0052-00/let/bec/sauerrev/I c cc: Mr. Paul Blackwelder, RCTC Mr. Mike Davis, Bechtel Mr. J. Anthony Sosebee, HZI AGENDA ITEM #8B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 3, 1996 TO: Budget and Finance Committee FROM: Susan Cornelison, Rail Program Manager THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director SUBJECT: RCTC Beach Trains This is a place holder for possible action regarding the RCTC sponsored trains operating between the Inland Empire and San Clemente this summer. If Commission action is unnecessary, an update on the service may be incorporated in the Metrolink Monthly Report information item. :jw