HomeMy Public PortalAbout04 April 5, 1995 Budget & FinanceO4O.at.a,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET & FINANCE COMMITTEE
(COMMISSIONERS RUSS BEIRICH, BOB BUSTER,
KAY CENICEROS, SYBIL JAFFY)
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 1995
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
3560 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 100
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
AGENDA
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
4. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS/FINANCIAL ITEMS.
5A. Final Management Letter Report and Audit Results.
Overview
At the December meeting, Ernst & Young was present to provide preliminary audit
results and management letter comments. The audits are substantially complete and
the management letter comments have been finalized. Ernst & Young will review the
final results with the Budget and Finance Committee. This item is for receive and file.
5B. Investment Policies.
Overview
That the Commission review existing investment policy, including derivatives, to
determine if changes should be made.
For your information, we have enclosed an article written by Moody's Investor
Services, one of the top three national rating agencies discussing five rules
municipalities should follow in developing investment policies.
Page 2
Budget/Finance Committee Meeting Agenda
April 5, 1995
5C. Mission and Goal Statements/Draft 95/96 Budget.
Overview
Staff is seeking Commission input prior to preparation of the Proposed Budtet for Fiscal
Year ending June 30, 1996. The Proposed Budget will incorporate Commission desired
changes and will be brought forward in May for final review, public hearing, and
adoption.
5D. Measure A Five Year Projects for Local Agency Capital Improvement Programs.
Overview
Annually, al; recipients of Measure A local streets and roads funds are required to
submit to the Commission a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. The Measure A CIP
provides data on what projects the Measure A disbursements will be expended on. To
assist those jurisdictions in preparing the CIP, and for planning purposes only, the
Commission provides a projection of Measure A revenues for the next five years. Once
reviewed by the Commission the projections will be forwarded to all local jurisdictions
no later than May 1, 1995. This item is for receive and file.
5E. Amendment to City of Calimesa Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan for
Loca/ Streets and Roads.
Overview
The Measure "A" Ordinance requires each recipient of streets and roads monies to
annually provide to the Commission a five year plan of how those funds are to be
expended in order to receive disbursements for local streets and roads. Any
substitutions, additions or deletion to the approved plans must also be approved by the
Commission.
5F. Co -Sponsorship of UCLA's Fall 1995 Symposium on "The Transportation, Land Use
and Air Quality Connection".
Overview
Staff is recommending co-sponsor support in the amount of $5,000 with the added
recommendation that three Board or staff members be authorized to represent the
Commission at the symposium.
5G. Monthly Cost and Schedule Reports.
Overview
The attached material depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts
reported by routes, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the
Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value
approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and
the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending December 31,
1994. This is a receive and file item.
Page 3
Budget/Finance Committee Meeting Agenda
April 5, 1995
5H. Single Signature Authority Report.
Overview
For the period ending March 31, 1995, three contracts was executed under single
signature authority granted to the Executive Director by the Commission. Those
contracts are outlined on the attached report. There remains approximately $35,000
capacity to enter into additional contracts for the remainder of the fiscal year. This is
a receive and file item.
6. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
6A. 1995/96 Local Transportation Funds and Surface Transportation Program Planning
Pro'ects.
Overview
A Call for Projects was announced on January 13, 1995, program the remaining funds
of the Surface Transportation Program (STP) planning funds. The 1995/96 Local
Transportation Funds (LTF) were also coordinated with this Call for Projects. The list
of projects have been submitted by the Western Riverside Council of Governments
(WRCOG) and the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) and is
recommended for approval.
6B. Sunrise Way/ Palm Canyon Drive Intersection - Amendment Number 2 Adjustment to
Authorized NBS/Lowry Contract Amount (RCTC Agreement No. RO-92-19) .
Overview
Staff is recommending that the Commission approve the NBS/Lowry contract
Amendment No. 2 for $8,557.26 and a total contract value not -to -exceed
$524,601.26. All terms and conditions of the original agreement (RO-92-19) and
subsequent amendment (Amendment No. 1) will remain in effect except as revised by
this amendment (Amendment 2). No further Amendments to this agreement are
anticipated.
6C. Route 91 Auxiliary Lane and Soundwa// Prioritization Study.
Overview
Staff is recommending that the Commission authorize the Executive Director to use the
existing soundwall design budget in Greiner's Contract No. RO-9101 in an amount not
to exceed $89,958.78 for base work and $10,041.22 for extra work to perform an
auxiliary lane and soundwall prioritization study for Route 1 between Magnolia Avenue
and Mary Street in the City of Riverside.
Page 4
Budget/Finance Committee Meeting Agenda
April 5, 1995
7. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE/BICYCLE.
7A. FY 94/95 Commuter Transportation Services, Inc. Contract Funding Issues.
Overview
Since November, 1994, Caltrans/Sacramento has failed to process a funding
amendment to the agreement between Caltrans and Commuter Transportation
Services, Inc. (CTS). Pursuant to an agreement between the county transportation
commission's (CTC'S) and Caltrans, the amendment would allow the flow of local CTC
funds to CTS in the total amount of $3.4 million. Should Caltrans/Sacramento position
remain unchanged over the next couple of weeks, this item is a place holder to allow
the Commission to take action as may be necessary to ensure payment of funds
($176,688) previous allocated to CTS by the Commission.
8. COMMUTER RAIL.
8A. Amendment to Capital Improvements Agreement.
Overview
Presented to the Commission is the final negotiated agreement related to the capital
improvements as well as cap on escalated costs for the San Bernardino Subdivision.
The Commission has previously approved the agreement in concept. A copy of the
agreement is included in the agenda packet. Staff will brief the Committee on specific
details of the agreement at the meeting on April 5th.
8B. Tustin Commuter Rail Station.
Overview
The City of Tustin has declined RCTC's offer of borrowing funds through the
Commission's commercial paper program, but suggests the possibility of RCTC making
a non -reimbursable contribution toward construction of Tustin's commuter rail station.
Staff is recommending that no further action be taken at this time.
8C. Amendment 2 to MiraIles Contract RO-9430 to provide planning and preliminary
engineering for Riverside -Downtown Commuter Rail Station second passenger platform,
pedestrian access between platforms, pedestrian access from surface streets,
Metro/ink train storage facility and possible future connections to San Jacinto Line
service.
Overview
Staff is recommending that the Commission approve the attached Amendment 2 to
Agreement RO-9345 with Miralles Associates to provide planning and preliminary
engineering services for Riverside -Downtown Commuter Rail Station second passenger
platform, pedestrian access between platforms, pedestrian access from surface streets,
Metrolink train storage facility and possible future connections to San Jacinto Line
service for an amount of $55,000 with an additional extra work amount of $8,250.
Page 5
Budget/Finance Committee Meeting Agenda
April 5, 1995
•
8D. Orange Blossom Festival Agreements.
Overview
Staff is recommending that the Executive Director or his designee be authorized to
execute indemnification agreements with Orange Empire Rail Museum and San
Bernardino Railroad Historical Society and a contract for chartered Metrolink trains with
the Southern California Regional Rail Authority.
10. ADJOURNMENT.
•
•
MINUTES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
March 2, 1995
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER.
The meeting of the Budget and Finance Committee was called to order by Chairman Russell
Beirich at 10:35 a.m., at the Doubletree Hotel, 67-697 Vista Chino, Cathedral City, California.
Members Present
Russ Beirich
Bob Buster
Kay Ceniceros
Sybil Jaffy
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
M/S/C to approve the minutes of the Budget and Finance Committee's February 1, 1995
meeting.
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
There were no public comments.
4. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
There were no additions/revisions to the agenda.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS/FINANCIAL ITEMS.
5A. Earthquake Insurance.
M/S/C that: 1) the Commission authorize the Executive Director to obtain
earthquake insurance coverage in an amount not to exceed $10,000; and,
2) staff be directed to urge the Riverside Commercial Investors to do the
earthquake rehabilitation work for the office building as soon as possible.
5B. Final Management Letter Report and Audit Results.
Dean Martin, Controller, stated that Ernst & Young requested that the report and audit
results be deferred to April.
M/S/C to defer the final management letter report and audit results to the
April meeting.
•
f
Budget and Finance Committee Minutes
March 2, 1995
Page 2
•
5C. Investment Policies.
Commissioner Ceniceros stated that the County of Riverside is setting up an Investment
Policies Oversight Committee and it might be beneficial for Dean Martin to be appointed
to the Committee.
M/S/C that the Commission's investment practices should be adopted as
policy as follows: 1) All monies from sources other than long term debt
proceeds should be deposited with the County of Riverside Treasury; 2)
Long terem debt proceeds must be deposited per the terms of the indenture
and must be reviewed and approved by the Commission; 3) Appoint the
Budget and Finance Committee to act on behalf of the Commission as an
investment oversight body. All Actions taken by this body must be reported
to the full Commission; and, 4) Appoint the Executive Director as the
Commission's Fiscal Officer with the authority to delegate the
responsibilities of the Fiscal Officer to the Controller.
5D. Local Transportation Fund Annual Apportionment.
M/S/C that the Commission approve the Local Transportation fund estimate
for fiscal year 1995/96 in the amount of $24,900,000.
5E. Quarterly Financial and Cost and Schedule Reports.
M/S/C that the Commission receive and file: 1) The Combining
Statements of Revenues and Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances (Unaudited) and the Highway and Rail Projects quarterly budget
report for the Quarter Ending December 31, 1994; and, 2) the cost and
schedule status report of the Measure A Contracts through the month
ending January 31, 1995. The contracts are segregated by Measure A
Plan category and includes Highway, Rail and other plans and programs.
5F. Revised 1994/95 Budget.
M/S/C that the Commission approve the revised FY 1994/95 budget.
6. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
6A. Route 111- Memorandum of Understanding with City of Indio for Completion of Measure
A Project at Monroe Street and Route 111.
M/S/C that the Commission authorize the Executive Director to enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Indio, subject to final legal
review of any comments offered by the Indio City Council.
•
•
Budget and Finance Committee
March 2, 1995
Page 3
•
•
•
7. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/PARK-N-RIDE/BICYCLE.
7A. Reprogramming of FY 1993-94 Transit Capital Improvement Funds from SunLine Transit
Agency to the Riverside Transit Agency.
M/S/C that the Commission approve allocation of $50,000 in unallocated
Western County local transportation funds to SunLine Transit Agency If the
California Transportation Commission approves reprogramming of Transit
Capital Improvement funds to RTA, with actual transfer of the local
transportation funds occurring upon receipt of the Transit Capital
Improvement Funds.
7B. Riverside Transit Agency FY 1995 Short Range Transit Plan Amendment.
M/S/C that the Commission approve the request from the Riverside Transit
Agency to reprogram the capital funds to projects listed in the memorandum
and amend RTA's FY 1995 Short Range Transit Plan accordingly.
8. SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES (SAFE).
8A. Freeway Service Patrol Program.
M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Continue the Riverside County Freeway
Service Patrol program provided State funds are available on a continuing
basis; and, 2) Authorize the Executive Director to amend the contract with
Hamner Towing, Inc., for tow truck services through June 30, 1996, at the
current hourly rates for FSP beats #1, #2, #4, and #18, subject to RCTC
approval of the FY 1995-96 budget.
9. COMMUTER RAIL.
9A. Authorization to Advertise: 1) Construction of the West Corona Rail Station: 2)
Construction of the Riverside - La Sierra Rail Station.
The Committee members requested that at the Commission meeting next week a
presentation be made by the Metrolink Marketing staff regarding marketing and
promotions for the Riverside Line and for the upcoming service to Orange County.
At this time, Legal Counsel was directed to review and provide analysis on fee
assessment districts for commuter rail stations.
M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Authorize staff to advertise for construction
bids the West Corona and Riverside -La Sierra rail stations when plans,
specifications and estimates are complete, and Caltrans has reviewed and
approved the packages; 2) Direct staff to work towards a station readiness
for operation date of September 22, 1995; 3) Authorize the Executive
Director to enter into the necessary reimbursement agreements as they are
prepared and ready; and, 4) Direct staff to present at the May meeting the
results of the receipt of bids, and the recommended lowest qualified bidder
for each station for a contract award.
Budget and Finance Committee Minutes
March 2, 1995
Page 4
•
9B. Construction Management Services Contract with Parsons Brinckerhoff for the La Sierra
and West Corona Rail Stations.
M/S/C that the Commission: 1) Approve the agreement with Parsons
Brinckerhoff Construction Services for the amount of $379,311 with $56,896
of extra work for a total amount not to exceed $436,207. The extra work
funds will only be used if needed and only with the specific authorization of
the Executive Director; and 2) Direct staff to forward the agreement along
with all supporting documentation of the selection process to Caftrans Local
Streets and Roads for review and approval so that the funds will be eligible
for CMAQ funding.
9C. Amendment 1 to Miralles Contract RO-9430 to provide Final Design and Construction
Drawings to enlarge the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Parking Lot.
M/S/C that the Commission approve Amendment 1 to the contract with
Miralies Associates for an amount of $35,560 to provide construction
drawings to extend the existing Riverside Metrolink Station parking south to
accommodate the increase demand on parking by the Santa Fe Metrolink
service.
9D. Professional Services Contract with Land Forms Landscape Construction.
M/S/C that the Commission authorize the Executive Director to enter into a
Professional Service Contract with Land Forms Landscape Construction for
landscape maintenance at the Riverside Downtown Station, the Pediey
Station and the Friis Property at Spruce and to include the additional option
to provide landscape maintenance for other Commission properties, e.g., La
Sierra and West Corona Stations.
10. ADJOURNMENT.
There being no other items on the agenda to discussed, the meeting adjourned at 11:46 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
N Kopenhaver
Clerk of the Commission
•
•
AGENDA ITEM #5A
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : D e a n M a r t i n , C o n t r o l l e r
S U B J E C T : F i n a l M a n a g e m e n t L e t t e r R e p o r t a n d A u d i t R e s u l t s
A t t h e D e c e m b e r m e e t i n g , E r n s t & Y o u n g w a s p r e s e n t t o p r o v i d e p r e l i m i n a r y a u d i t
r e s u l t s a n d m a n a g e m e n t l e t t e r c o m m e n t s . T h e a u d i t s a r e s u b s t a n t i a l l y c o m p l e t e a n d
t h e m a n a g e m e n t l e t t e r c o m m e n t s h a v e b e e n f i n a l i z e d . E r n s t & Y o u n g w i l l r e v i e w t h e
f i n a l r e s u l t s w i t h t h e B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e .
S t a f f w i l l p r o v i d e r e s p o n s e s t o t h e m a n a g e m e n t l e t t e r c o m m e n t s a t t h e M a y m e e t i n g .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e a n d f i l e .
: j w
F : \ U S E R S \ P R E P R I N T \ M A R . 9 5 \ A U D I T . D M
AGENDA ITEM #5B
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
April 5, 1995
Budget and Finance Committee
Dean Martin, Controller
SUBJECT: Investment Policies
At its March meeting, the Commission requested that the Budget and Finance
Committee review the Commission's investment policies and recommend possible
changes to those policies. In the interim the following staff recommendations were
adopted as policy:
1) All monies from sources other than long term debt proceeds should be
deposited with the County of Riverside Treasury. A copy of the County's
portfolio and its market value be included in the Commission's monthly agenda
on the consent calendar.
2) Long term debt proceeds must be deposited per the terms of the indenture and
must be reviewed and approved by the Commission.
3) Appoint the Budget and Finance Committee to act on behalf of the Commission
as an investment oversight body. All actions taken by this body must be
reported to the full Commission.
4) Appoint the Executive Director as the Commission's Fiscal Officer with the
authority to delegate the responsibilities of the Fiscal Officer to the Controller.
At the request of the Chairman of the Budget and Finance Committee, a survey was
forwarded to all commissioners requesting their input on investment policies. The
results of this survey will be used by Budget and Finance to review the adopted policy
and make suggested changes, if any.
Part of that review will include taking another look at the Commission's policies on
derivatives. To date the Commission has entered a number of swap transactions
based on a 1991 authorization, restated in 1993. The Commission uses fixed to
floating interest rate swaps as a part of its investment strategy. All of the swap
transactions entered in by the Commission to date are considered fairly simple, plain
"vanilla" type transactions. Riskier, more complex investment based derivatives used
by Orange County have not been used by the Commission.
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\INVEST.DM
Page 2
The Commission's interest rate swaps have accomplished the following:
Match assets to liabilities. The Commission has variable rate investments via the
County of Riverside pool, and previously through the California Arbitrage Management
Program (CAMP). The Commission's debt is fixed. The end result is a mismatch since
you have a variable revenue stream (i.e., interest income) and a fixed expenditure (i.e.,
interest expense). The interest rate swap creates a match by converting the
Commission's fixed rate debt to variable rate debt. Debt costs have been lowered by
allowing the Commission to temporarily (the term of the swap is five years) access
short term municipal rates while maintaining an attractive long term capital program.
Does all of this mean that the Commission has no risk?
There is some risk associated with any derivative product. The Commission faces
three risks with its interest rate swap --basis point risk, market risk, and credit risk.
Basis point risk arises if the variable rate paid by the Commission exceeds the fixed
rate paid to the Commission by the swap provider. That risk is continually monitored
by staff, Goldman Sachs, and Charles Bell Securities. The Commission is also hedged
by its investments since they will be earning a higher return as rates increase. Those
increased returns should offset any costs incurred from basis point risk. The
Commission continues to benefit from a comfortable spread between its fixed receivor
rate and its variable rate (i.e., one percent plus).
The Commission faces market risk when the value of our swap in the open market
declines. The Commission is only exposed to that risk if it liquidates the swap prior
to term in an unfavorable market environment. Even if that were to occur, it would
not jeopardize the Commission's invested funds or the Commission's overall financial
stability.
Credit risk arises if your counterpart defaults on the swap arrangement. The
Commission mitigates that risk by entering swap agreements with strongly rated
counterparties. The Commission has applied rating agency criteria, which strongly
encourages that any swap provider should be rated no less than an A or the issuer's
rating, whichever is greater. Our current swap provider, Goldman Sachs, is the
highest rated domestic investment banking firm on Wall Street.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission review existing investment policy, including derivatives, to
determine if changes should be made.
For your information, we have enclosed an article written by Moody's Investor
Services, one of the top three national rating agencies discussing five rules
municipalities should follow in developing investment policies.
:jw
F:\USERS\PR EPRI NT\APR.95\I NV EST. DM
BY REGIS SHIELDS, ESQ.
•
•
•
ROBERT NEU,EUKER
Investment
Pitfalls Five Simple Rules roKeep
You Out of the News
The Orange County, California bankruptcy filing and the investment
strategies that led that affluent county to realize investment losses of
approximately $1.7 billion has prompted elected officials,
1 fund managers, and other officials to assess
okp local government investment portfolios and
•
111
reevaluate their investment policies.
While a nationwide survey of municipal debt
issuers conducted by Moody's in December
1994 confirmed the generally conservative na-
ture of municipal investment strategies (see To
Our Readers), local government officials
can learn some valuable lessons from the
Orange County experience.
Orange County's investment Strategy
Was Very Aggressive
The enormous losses experienced by the
Orange County Investment Pool stemmed
from an aggressive investment strategy based
primarily on enhancing yield. At the time
of its collapse, the pool was highly leveraged
through the use of reverse repurchase
arrangements which mismatched assets and
liabilities. The pool also had a substantial
unhedged position in derivative instru-
ments that were extremely vulnerable to in-
terest -rate changes, such as structured
notes issued by federal government -spon-
sored enterprises.
Rising interest rates resulted in substantial
market value losses on the entire portfolio, and
collateral calls on the reverse repurchase agree-
ments forced the county to realize those losses.
MUNUT'S MUNICIPAL ISSUES 5
What is a derivative?
A derivative is a
financial instrument
whose returns are
linked to, or derived
from, the performance
of one or more
underlying assets or
indices, such as
interest rates, bonds,
currencies, or
commodities.
Derivative products
can be collateralized
mortgage obligations
(CMOs), strips of
CMOs such as interest -
only obligations (IOs)
or principal -only
obligations (POs),
structured notes,
forwards, futures,
currency and interest
rate swaps, options,
floaters, inverse
floaters, caps, floors,
collars.
When word of these market losses reached volun-
tary participants in the pool, their demands for
withdrawals created a liquidity crisis the portfolio
could not withstand.
Clear Guidelines and Monitoring Are Critical
So, what lessons can issuers learn from Orange
County's mistakes and how can investment offi-
cials apply these lessons to their own investment
practices? Here are a few rules that governments
should follow to avoid the pitfalls encountered by
Orange County.
Rule number one: Know what you are buying.
Rule number two: Develop adequate controls and
oversight.
Rule number three: Diversify investments.
Rule numberfivur:: Match investment maturities
to cash flow requirements.
Rule number five: Adopta written investment
policy.
Rule Number One: Know what you are buying
Derivatives are not inherently bad. Orange
County did not have problems simply because
they invested in complex financial products.
Their problems arose because these products were
imprudently used and managed.
If the government investor does not fully un-
derstand an investment and all the nuances of
how the product will perform in different inter-
est -rate environments and market conditions, the
investment should not be purchased. Rewards do
not come without risks, and investments that of-
fer above -market returns are likely to have some
increased risk associated with them. Investment
officials should understand the implications of
those risks before investing in any product, and
should evaluate whether the risks are consistent
with the mandate to manage public funds pru-
dently and preserve capital.
The obligation to understand and evaluate
risks applies to all investments —not just new or
unfamiliar ones —including investments that are
legally authorized by state statute or permitted in
the investment provisions of a bond resolution or
indenture. Just because an investment is legally
authorized or permitted does not mean it is ap-
propriate for the particular funds being invested.
In the case of Orange County, reverse repurchase
arrangements were specifically authorized under
California law. Issuers must make independent
decisions about each type of investment on the
authorized list.
In addition, government investors should
make independent, informed decisions about the
suitability or appropriateness of the product for
their specific purposes. They should not rely sole-
ly on their investment agents to make this deter-
mination. The goals of broker/dealers and gov-
ernment investors are very different. While a
number of municipalities have sued their brokers
for derivative losses on the basis that the broker
sold them inappropriate investments, brokers are
not "guarantors" of investments and local govern-
ments should not view them as such. Investment
officials should also be aware that hiring an out-
side advisor to handle investments does not ab-
solve them of the responsibility to manage those
public funds appropriately.
Rule Number Two: Develop adequate controls
and oversight
Responsibility for investment activity should
never rest solely with one person. Local govern-
ments must put in place adequate controls and
oversight to ensure that investment decisions are
made within the parameters of established policy
and that they are consistent with the objectives for
the particular funds. Issuers should also establish
a reporting and review process: investment deci-
sions and portfolio positions should be closely re-
viewed by the appropriate government body or by
officials ultimately responsible for performance,
such as an elected board of commissioners.
New and complex financial instruments are
constantly being created to meet investors' needs.
Investment officials should incorporate new
products into their investment strategy only if
they have the expertise to adequately understand
the product. More important, they must have the
staff to monitor the investments and related risks
and be able to respond to changing financial con-
ditions. Some investments possess volatile price
characteristics that require constant monitoring
and sophisticated computer models to accurately
assess exposure and risk.
Rule Number Three: Diversify investments
Investing primarily in one type of security
magnifies the risks associated with that particular
6 M00DY'S MUNICIPAL ISSUES
"
"
i n v e s t m e n t . A s t h e m a r k e t f l u c t u a t e s , t h e p e r f o r -
m a n c e o f a n o n - d i v e r s i f i e d i n v e s t m e n t p o r t f o l i o
w i l l d e p e n d o n t h e s t r e n g t h o r w e a k n e s s o f t h a t
p a r t i c u l a r i n v e s t m e n t .
T h i s e f f e c t w a s p a r t i c u l a r l y n o t a b l e i n 1 9 9 4 f o r
i s s u e r s w h o c o n c e n t r a t e d t h e i r i n v e s t m e n t s i n
l o n g e r - t e r m c o l l a t e r a l i z e d m o r t g a g e o b l i g a t i o n s .
A s i n t e r e s t r a t e s r o s e , t h e s e i n v e s t m e n t s l o s t m a r -
k e t v a l u e a n d c r e a t e d l i q u i d i t y c o n c e r n s . S o m e
l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t s r e a l i z e d s u b s t a n t i a l l o s s e s , a n d
h a d d i f f i c u l t y m e e t i n g c a s h - f l o w r e q u i r e m e n t s .
R u l e N u m b e r F o u r : M a t c h i n v e s t m e n t m a t u r i t i e s
a n d c a s h f l o w r e q u i r e m e n t s
P o r t f o l i o i n v e s t m e n t s s h o u l d b e s t r u c t u r e d
a r o u n d a n t i c i p a t e d c a s h - f l o w r e q u i r e m e n t s . I f i n -
v e s t o r s a r e c a r e f u l t o s e l e c t t h e i r i n v e s t m e n t v e h i -
c l e s a n d m a t c h m a t u r i t i e s w i t h c a s h - f l o w n e e d s ,
t h e m a r k e t v a l u e f l u c t u a t i o n s o f t h e p o r t f o l i o
s h o u l d h a v e l i t t l e i m p a c t o n t h e l o c a l g o v e r n -
m e n t , e v e n t h o u g h t h e r e m a y b e " u n r e a l i z e d "
l o s s e s i n t h e i n t e r i m .
U n r e a l i z e d l o s s e s b e c o m e a p r o b l e m w h e n
t h e r e i s a m i s m a t c h b e t w e e n t h e d u r a t i o n o f i n -
v e s t m e n t s i n t h e p o r t f o l i o a n d e i t h e r n o r m a l c a s h -
f l o w r e q u i r e m e n t s o r u n a n t i c i p a t e d w i t h d r a w a l s .
W h e n e i t h e r o f t h e s e t h i n g s h a p p e n , t h e i s s u e r
w i l l h a v e t o l i q u i d a t e s e c u r i t i e s b e f o r e t h e y m a -
t u r e , a n d m a y t h e n b e f o r c e d t o e x p e r i e n c e a n
a c t u a l l o s s .
R u l e N u m b e r F i v e : A d o p t a w r i t t e n i n v e s t m e n t
p o l i c y
M u n i c i p a l i t i e s s h o u l d d e v e l o p a n d a d o p t a n
i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c y t h a t d e t a i l s a n d c l a r i f i e s i n v e s t -
m e n t o b j e c t i v e s a n d t h e p r o c e d u r e s a n d c o n -
s t r a i n t s n e c e s s a r y t o r e a c h t h o s e o b j e c t i v e s . A n i n -
v e s t m e n t p o l i c y s e t f o r t h i n a d e q u a t e d e t a i l , c o m -
b i n e d w i t h a p p r o p r i a t e c o n t r o l s , c a n g u i d e t h e a c -
t i v i t y o f i n v e s t m e n t o f f i c i a l s a n d o u t s i d e i n v e s t -
m e n t a d v i s o r s . A l l i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c i e s s h o u l d r e -
f l e c t t h e m a n d a t e t o m a n a g e p u b l i c f u n d s p r u -
d e n t l y a n d s h o u l d p l a c e a p p r o p r i a t e e m p h a s i s o n
t h e g o a l s o f s a f e t y o f p r i n c i p a l f i r s t , l i q u i d i t y s e c -
o n d , a n d y i e l d l a s t .
A s d e m o n s t r a t e d b y t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y b a n k -
r u p t c y f i l i n g , m a k i n g i n v e s t m e n t d e c i s i o n s s t r i c t -
l y o n t h e b a s i s o f y i e l d i s a n i m p r u d e n t s t r a t e g y .
S a f e t y o f p r i n c i p a l s h o u l d n o t b e u n d u l y j e o p a r -
d i z e d f o r t h e o b j e c t i v e o f h i g h e r y i e l d s .
I n a d d i t i o n t o o b j e c t i v e s a n d g o a l s , i n v e s t m e n t
g u i d e l i n e s s h o u l d i n c o r p o r a t e p a r a m e t e r s o n m a r -
k e t r i s k a s w e l l a s o n c r e d i t r i s k . A h i g h l y r a t e d c o l -
l a t e r a l i z e d m o r t g a g e o b l i g a t i o n i s s u e d a n d g u a r -
a n t e e d b y a f e d e r a l a g e n c y c a n b e h i g h l y i l l i q u i d
a n d d i f f i c u l t t o p r i c e . I f t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e i n v e s t -
m e n t d o e s n o t m a t c h t h e l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t ' s c a s h -
f l o w r e q u i r e m e n t s , t h e n t h e s e c u r i t y c a n t u r n o u t
t o b e a h i g h l y i n a p p r o p r i a t e i n v e s t m e n t , d e s p i t e
t h e h i g h c r e d i t r a t i n g .
I n v e s t m e n t p o l i c i e s s h o u l d a l s o s p e c i f y a l l o w -
a b l e i n v e s t m e n t s . B a s e d o n t h e i s s u e r ' s d e t e r m i n a -
t i o n o f w h a t i s a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t h e p a r t i c u l a r f u n d s
b e i n g i n v e s t e d , t h i s l i s t m a y b e n a r r o w e r t h a n
s t a t e s t a t u t o r y g u i d e l i n e s . C e r t a i n d e r i v a t i v e
p r o d u c t s m a y b e i n a p p r o p r i a t e f o r a p a r t i c u l a r
f u n d o r i n v e s t o r , f o r e x a m p l e .
G o v e r n m e n t o f f i c i a l s w h o d r a w u p i n v e s t m e n t
p o l i c i e s s h o u l d a p p l y p a r t i c u l a r s c r u t i n y t o 1 )
p r o d u c t s w i t h h i g h p r i c e v o l a t i l i t y ; 2 ) h i g h l y
l e v e r a g e d p r o d u c t s ; 3 ) p r o d u c t s t h a t a r e n o t m a r -
k e t t e s t e d ; 4 ) i l l i q u i d p r o d u c t s t h a t a r e d i f f i c u l t t o
v a l u e ; a n d 5 ) p r o d u c t s t h a t r e q u i r e a h i g h d e g r e e
o f e x p e r t i s e t o m a n a g e , n e e d c o n s t a n t m o n i t o r i n g
o r s o p h i s t i c a t e d c o m p u t e r m o d e l s .
I n v e s t m e n t p o l i c y s h o u l d i n c l u d e g u i d e l i n e s
o n a d e q u a t e c o n t r o l s a n d m o n i t o r i n g p r o c e d u r e s ,
r e p o r t i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s t o t h e g o v e r n i n g b o d y o r
o f f i c i a l s u l t i m a t e l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r p e r f o r m a n c e ,
d i v e r s i f i c a t i o n , a n d m a t u r i t i e s o f i n v e s t m e n t s .
T h e i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c y s h o u l d b e r e v i e w e d p e r i -
o d i c a l l y a n d a d j u s t e d t o i m p r o v e i t s e f f e c t i v e n e s s
a n d t o r e f l e c t c h a n g e s i n t h e m a r k e t .
C o n c l u s i o n
F o r m a n y i s s u e r s o f m u n i c i p a l d e b t , e v e n t s i n
O r a n g e C o u n t y w e r e a w a k e - u p c a l l . M a n y i s -
s u e r s r e a l i z e d t h e y d i d n o t k n o w e x a c t l y w h a t w a s
i n t h e i r i n v e s t m e n t p o r t f o l i o s , o r t h a t t h e y h a d i n -
a d e q u a t e p r o c e d u r e s i n p l a c e t o r e v i e w a n d m o n i -
t o r p e r f o r m a n c e . O r a n g e C o u n t y ' s d i f f i c u l t i e s r e -
i n f o r c e d t h e b e n e f i t s o f d i v e r s i f i c a t i o n a s w e l l a s
t h e n e e d t o m a t c h m a t u r i t i e s t o c a s h f l o w r e q u i r e -
m e n t s . U n d o u b t e d l y t h e s t a r t i n g p o i n t f o r m a n y
i s s u e r s o f m u n i c i p a l d e b t w i l l b e t h e f o r m u l a t i o n
o f a n i n v e s t m e n t p o l i c y t h a t i n c o r p o r a t e s t h e s e
f i v e r u l e s .
R e g i s S h i e l d s , E s q . ( 2 1 2 - 5 5 3 - 4 9 7 4 ) i s a n a s s i s t a n t
v i c e p r e s i d e n t i n t h e L e g a l A n a l y s i s g r o u p .
W h a t i s a r e v e r s e
r e p u r c h a s e a g r e e m e n t ?
R e v e r s e r e p u r c h a s e
a n d r e p u r c h a s e
a g r e e m e n t s a r e t h e
s a m e t r a n s a c t i o n
v i e w e d f r o m o p p o s i t e
e c o n o m i c p o s i t i o n s o f
t h e p a r t i e s . T h e
a g r e e m e n t s p r o v i d e
f o r t h e p u r c h a s e o f
s e c u r i t i e s ( c o l l a t e r a l )
a n d t h e s i m u l t a n e o u s
c o m m i t m e n t b y t h e
s e l l e r t o r e p u r c h a s e
t h e s e c u r i t i e s a t a s e t
p r i c e o n a s p e c i f i c
d a t e . T h e s e l l e r i s
e n t e r i n g i n t o a
r e v e r s e r e p u r c h a s e
a g r e e m e n t .
M 0 0 0 Y ' S M U N I C I P A L I S S U E S 7
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : D e a n M a r t i n , C o n t r o l l e r
S U B J E C T : M i s s i o n a n d G o a l S t a t e m e n t s / D r a f t 9 5 / 9 6 B u d g e t
T h e M i s s i o n a n d G o a l S t a t e m e n t s a n d D r a f t 9 5 / 9 6 B u d g e t w e r e s t i l l b e i n g p r e p a r e d
a t t i m e o f a g e n d a m a i l i n g . T h e M i s s i o n a n d G o a l S t a t e m e n t s a l o n g w i t h t h e D r a f t
9 5 / 9 6 B u d g e t w i l l b e m a i l e d u n d e r s e p a r a t e c o v e r .
S t a f f i s s e e k i n g C o m m i s s i o n i n p u t p r i o r t o p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e P r o p o s e d B u d g e t f o r
F i s c a l Y e a r E n d i n g J u n e 3 0 , 1 9 9 6 . T h e P r o p o s e d B u d g e t w i l l i n c o r p o r a t e C o m m i s s i o n
d e s i r e d c h a n g e s a n d w i l l b e b r o u g h t f o r w a r d i n M a y f o r f i n a l r e v e i w , p u b l i c h e a r i n g ,
a n d a d o p t i o n .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N .
1 ) . A p p r o v e t h e M i s s i o n a n d G o a l S t a t e m e n t s f o r F i s c a l Y e a r 9 5 / 9 6 .
2 ) . R e v i e w t h e D r a f t B u d g e t a n d p r o v i d e i n p u t t o s t a f f f o r d e s i r e d c h a n g e s .
: j w
F : \ U S E R S \ P R E P R I N T \ M A R . 9 5 \ A U D I T . D M
AGENDA ITEM #5D
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : D e a n M a r t i n , C o n t r o l l e r
S U B J E C T : M e a s u r e A F i v e Y e a r P r o j e c t s f o r L o c a l A g e n c y C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t
P r o g r a m s
A n n u a l l y , a l l r e c i p i e n t s o f M e a s u r e A l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s f u n d s a r e r e q u i r e d t o
s u b m i t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a F i v e Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n . T h e M e a s u r e A C I P
p r o v i d e s d a t a o n w h a t p r o j e c t s t h e M e a s u r e A d i s b u r s e m e n t s w i l l b e e x p e n d e d o n .
T o a s s i s t t h o s e j u r i s d i c t i o n s i n p r e p a r i n g t h e C I P , a n d f o r p l a n n i n g p u r p o s e s o n l y , t h e
C o m m i s s i o n p r o v i d e s a p r o j e c t i o n o f M e a s u r e A r e v e n u e s f o r t h e n e x t f i v e y e a r s .
O n c e r e v i e w e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n t h e p r o j e c t i o n s w i l l b e f o r w a r d e d t o a l l l o c a l
j u r i s d i c t i o n s n o l a t e r t h a n M a y 1 , 1 9 9 5 .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e a n d f i l e .
: j w
F : \ U S E R S \ P R E P R I N T \ A P R . 9 5 \ 5 Y R P R O . D M
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S ' ,
P R O J E G r E D A N N U A L . D I S B U R S E M E N T S
F Y 1 9 9 6 . 2 0 0 0
W E S T E R N C O U N T Y A R E A :
B A N N I N G
B E A U M O N T
C A L I M E S A
C A N Y O N L A K E S
C O R O N A
H E M E T
L A K E E L S I N O R E
M O R E N O V A L L E Y
M U R R I E T A
N O R C O
P E R R I S
R I V E R S I D E
S A N J A C I N T O
T E M E C U L A
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y
W E S T E R N C O U N T Y A R E A T O T A L
1 9 9 6
$ 3 1 6 , 1 6 3 . 9 4
$ 1 4 8 , 0 8 3 . 1 1
$ 1 3 6 , 3 9 1 . 4 4
$ 1 4 1 , 7 4 5 . 0 0
$ 1 , 4 6 9 , 9 0 8 . 9 2
9 7 7 7 , 7 4 7 . 7 1
9 3 6 0 , 9 7 7 . 0 3
9 1 , 7 2 1 , 8 2 3 . 2 6
$ 3 9 2 , 1 3 7 . 9 9
9 3 3 8 , 9 1 7 . 7 4
$ 4 2 8 , 0 0 3 . 4 3
$ 3 , 7 3 6 , 5 9 2 . 7 5
9 2 8 2 , 5 8 8 . 4 7
9 7 1 9 , 5 4 8 . 5 7
$ 3 , 4 1 9 , 1 2 1 . 3 8
$ 1 4 , 3 8 9 , 7 5 0 . 7 5
1 9 9 7
$ 3 2 7 , 2 2 9 . 6 8
9 1 5 3 , 2 6 6 . 0 2
9 1 4 1 , 1 6 5 . 1 4
9 1 4 6 , 7 0 6 . 0 8
9 1 , 5 2 1 , 3 5 5 . 7 3
$ 8 0 4 , 9 6 8 . 8 8
$ 3 7 3 , 6 1 1 . 2 3
9 1 , 7 8 2 , 0 8 7 . 0 7
$ 4 0 5 , 8 6 2 . 8 2
9 3 5 0 , 7 7 9 . 8 6
$ 4 4 2 , 9 8 3 . 5 5
$ 3 , 8 6 7 , 3 7 3 . 5 0
9 2 9 2 , 4 7 9 . 0 7
$ 7 4 4 , 7 3 2 . 7 7
$ 3 , 5 3 8 , 7 9 0 . 6 3
$ 1 4 , 8 9 3 , 3 9 2 . 0 3
1 9 9 8
$ 3 3 8 , 6 8 2 . 7 1
9 1 5 8 , 6 3 0 . 3 3
9 1 4 6 , 1 0 5 . 9 2
9 1 5 1 , 8 4 0 . 7 9
9 1 , 5 7 4 , 6 0 3 . 1 8
9 8 3 3 , 1 4 2 . 8 0
9 3 8 6 , 6 8 7 . 6 2
9 1 , 8 4 4 , 4 6 0 . 1 2
$ 4 2 0 , 0 6 8 . 0 2
$ 3 6 3 , 0 5 7 . 1 6
$ 4 5 8 , 4 8 7 . 9 7
9 4 , 0 0 2 , 7 3 1 . 5 7
$ 3 0 2 , 7 1 5 . 8 3
$ 7 7 0 , 7 9 8 . 4 1
9 3 , 6 6 2 , 6 4 8 . 3 1
$ 1 5 , 4 1 4 , 6 6 0 . 7 5
1 9 9 9
$ 3 5 0 , 5 3 6 . 6 1
9 1 6 4 , 1 8 2 . 3 9
$ 1 5 1 , 2 1 9 . 6 2
$ 1 5 7 , 1 5 5 . 2 2
9 1 , 6 2 9 , 7 1 4 . 2 9
$ 8 6 2 , 3 0 2 . 7 9
9 4 0 0 , 2 2 1 . 6 9
9 1 , 9 0 9 , 0 1 6 . 2 3
$ 4 3 4 , 7 7 0 . 4 0
$ 3 7 5 , 7 6 4 . 1 6
$ 4 7 4 , 5 3 5 . 0 5
9 4 , 1 4 2 , 8 2 7 . 1 8
9 3 1 3 , 3 1 0 . 8 9
9 7 9 7 , 7 7 6 . 3 6
9 3 , 7 9 0 , 8 4 1 . 0 0
$ 1 5 , 9 5 4 , 1 7 3 . 8 7
9 3 6 2 , 8 0 5 . 3 9
9 1 6 9 , 9 2 8 . 7 7
$ 1 5 6 , 5 1 2 . 3 1
9 1 6 2 , 6 5 5 . 6 5
$ 1 , 6 8 6 , 7 5 4 . 2 9
$ 8 9 2 , 4 8 3 . 3 9
9 4 1 4 , 2 2 9 . 4 5
9 1 , 9 7 5 , 8 3 1 . 7 9
9 4 4 9 , 9 8 7 . 3 6
9 3 8 8 , 9 1 5 . 9 1
$ 4 9 1 , 1 4 3 . 7 8
$ 4 , 2 8 7 , 8 2 6 . 1 3
$ 3 2 4 , 2 7 6 . 7 7
5 8 2 5 , 6 9 8 . 5 3
$ 3 , 9 2 3 , 5 2 0 . 4 3
$ 1 6 , 5 1 2 , 5 6 9 . 9 6
T O T A L _
1 9 9 8 - 2 0 0 0 . . . : . 1
$ 1 , 6 9 5 , 4 1 8 . 3 3
9 7 9 4 , 0 9 0 . 6 1
9 7 3 1 , 3 9 4 . 4 2
9 7 6 0 , 1 0 2 . 7 4
9 7 , 8 8 2 , 3 3 6 . 4 1
$ 4 , 1 7 0 , 6 4 5 . 5 8
9 1 , 9 3 5 , 7 2 7 . 0 2
$ 9 , 2 3 3 , 2 1 8 . 4 8
9 2 , 1 0 2 , 8 2 6 . 6 0
9 1 , 8 1 7 , 4 3 4 . 8 3
$ 2 , 2 9 5 , 1 5 3 . 7 9
9 2 0 , 0 3 7 , 3 5 1 . 1 3
9 1 , 5 1 5 , 3 7 1 . 0 2
9 3 , 8 5 8 , 5 5 4 . 6 4
$ 1 8 , 3 3 4 , 9 2 1 . 7 5
$ 7 7 , 1 6 4 , 5 4 7 . 3 6
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E " A " L O C A L S T R E E T S A N D R O A D S
P R O J E C T E D A N N U A L D I S B U R S E M E N T S
F Y 1 9 9 6 - 2 0 0 0
C O A C H E L L A V A L L E Y A R E A :
C A T H E D R A L C I T Y
C O A C H E L L A
D E S E R T H O T S P R I N G S
I N D I A N W E L L S
I N D I O
L A Q U I N T A
P A L M S P R I N G S
P A L M D E S E R T
R A N C H O M I R A G E
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y
C V A G
C O A C H E L L A V A L L E Y A R E A T O T A L
$ 6 6 1 , 7 1 1 . 7 9
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 1 1 0 , 9 0 2 . 6 8
$ 5 8 4 , 5 2 0 . 3 1
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 1 , 0 1 2 , 6 3 8 . 6 8
$ 9 0 1 , 2 2 3 . 4 6
$ 3 5 4 , 9 1 4 . 5 6
$ 6 0 7 , 8 3 0 . 7 0
$ 5 8 6 , 0 6 3 . 6 0
$ 4 , 8 1 9 , 8 0 5 . 7 9
"
$ 6 8 4 , 8 7 1 . 7 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 1 1 4 , 7 8 4 . 2 8
$ 6 0 4 , 9 7 8 . 5 2
$ o . 0 0
$ 1 , 0 4 8 , 0 8 1 . 0 3
$ 9 3 2 , 7 6 6 . 2 9
$ 3 6 7 , 3 3 6 . 5 7
$ 6 2 9 , 1 0 4 . 7 8
$ 6 0 6 , 5 7 5 . 8 3
$ 4 , 9 8 8 , 4 9 8 . 9 9
$ 7 0 8 , 8 4 2 . 2 1 $ 7 3 3 , 6 5 1 . 6 9
$ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0
$ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 . 0 0
$ 1 1 8 , 8 0 1 . 7 2 $ 1 2 2 , 9 5 9 . 7 9
$ 6 2 6 , 1 5 2 . 7 7 $ 6 4 8 , 0 6 8 . 1 2
$ o . 0 0 $ o . 0 0
$ 1 , 0 8 4 , 7 6 3 . 8 7 $ 1 , 1 2 2 , 7 3 0 . 6 1
$ 9 6 5 , 4 1 3 . 1 1 $ 9 9 9 , 2 0 2 . 5 6
$ 3 8 0 , 1 9 3 . 3 5 $ 3 9 3 , 5 0 0 . 1 2
$ 6 5 1 , 1 2 3 . 4 4 $ 6 7 3 , 9 1 2 . 7 6
$ 6 2 7 , 8 0 5 . 9 8 $ 6 4 9 , 7 7 9 . 1 9
$ 5 , 1 6 3 , 0 9 6 . 4 5 8 5 , 3 4 3 , 8 0 4 . 8 3
8 7 5 9 , 3 2 9 . 5 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 1 2 7 , 2 6 3 . 3 8
$ 6 7 0 , 7 5 0 . 5 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 1 , 1 6 2 , 0 2 6 . 1 8
8 1 , 0 3 4 , 1 7 4 . 6 5
$ 4 0 7 , 2 7 2 . 6 2
$ 6 9 7 , 4 9 9 . 7 1
$ 6 7 2 , 5 2 1 . 4 6
$ 5 , 5 3 0 , 8 3 8 . 0 0
$ 3 , 5 4 8 , 4 0 6 . 8 8
8 0 . 0 0
$ 0 . 0 0
$ 5 9 4 , 7 1 1 . 8 4
8 3 , 1 3 4 , 4 7 0 . 2 2
8 0 . 0 0
8 5 , 4 3 0 , 2 4 0 . 3 7
$ 4 , 8 3 2 , 7 8 0 . 0 8
$ 1 , 9 0 3 , 2 1 7 . 2 2
8 3 , 2 5 9 , 4 7 1 . 4 0
8 3 , 1 4 2 , 7 4 6 . 0 5
$ 2 5 , 8 4 6 , 0 4 4 . 0 6
RIVERSIDE CC . UNTY TRANSPORTATION''COMMISSION
MEASURE "A",'.LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS
PROJECTED ANNUAL DISBURSEMENTS'
FY 1996-2000 ; •
P ALO VERDE VALLEY AREA
BLYTHE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PALO VERDE AREA TOTAL
8516,861.82
8165,377 .22
5682,239.05
8534,951 .99
8171,165 .43
8706,117.41
8553,675 .31
8177,156 .22
$730,831 .52
$573,053.94
8183,356.68
5766,410.63
8593,110.83
8189,774 .17
8782,885.00
82,771,653.89
8886,829.72
$3,658,483.60
•
s
AGENDA ITEM #5E
"
"
D A T E :
T O :
F R O M :
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
D e a n M a r t i n , C o n t r o l l e r
J e r r y R i v e r a , S t a f f A n a l y s t I I I
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : A m e n d m e n t t o C i t y o f C a l i m e s a M e a s u r e " A " F i v e Y e a r C a p i t a l
I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n f o r L o c a l S t r e e t s a n d R o a d s
T h e M e a s u r e " A " O r d i n a n c e r e q u i r e s e a c h r e c i p i e n t o f s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s m o n i e s t o
a n n u a l l y p r o v i d e t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n a f i v e y e a r p l a n o n h o w t h o s e f u n d s a r e t o b e
e x p e n d e d i n o r d e r t o r e c e i v e d i s b u r s e m e n t s f o r l o c a l s t r e e t s a n d r o a d s . I n a d d i t i o n ,
t h e c i t i e s i n t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a n d t h e C o u n t y m u s t b e p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n C V A G ' s
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e ( T U M F ) p r o g r a m . T h e a g e n c i e s a r e a l s o
r e q u i r e d t o s u b m i t t h e a n n u a l c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f M a i n t e n a n c e o f E f f o r t ( M O E )
a c c o m p a n i e d b y d o c u m e n t a t i o n s u p p o r t i n g t h e c a l c u l a t i o n .
T h e C o m m i s s i o n a c c e p t e d t h e C i t y o f C a l i m e s a ' s P l a n a t i t s m e e t i n g o n J u l y 1 3 ,
1 9 9 4 . T h e C i t y i s r e q u e s t i n g a m o d i f i c a t i o n t o t h e P l a n t o d e l e t e o n e $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 p r o j e c t
a n d s u b s t i t u t e a n o t h e r p r o j e c t f o r t h e s a m e a m o u n t .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a m e n d t h e F Y 1 9 9 4 - 9 5 M e a s u r e " A " C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n
f o r t h e C i t y o f C a l i m e s a a s s u b m i t t e d .
: j w
F : \ U S E R S \ P R E P R I N T \ A P R . 9 5 \ M E A S - C A L . D M / R I
"
"
C i t y O f C a l i m e & a
M a r c h 1 5 , 1 9 9 5
W . D e a n M a r t i n , C o n t r o l l e r
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
3 5 6 0 U n i v e r s i t y A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 0 0
R i v e r s i d e , C A 9 2 5 0 1
R e : R e q u e s t t o M o d i f y M e a s u r e A C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m f o r
F i s c a l Y e a r 1 9 9 4 - 9 5
D e a r M r . M a r t i n :
T h e C i t y o f C a l i m e s a i s h e r e b y r e q u e s t i n g a m o d i f i c a t i o n t o t h e
a p p r o v e d 5 Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m a s a p p r o v e d b y R C T C .
I t e m 1 o f t h e s u b m i t t e d p r o g r a m w i l l n o t b e s c h e d u l e d f o r t h e
c u r r e n t f i s c a l y e a r . A n i t e m n u m b e r e d 4 i s r e q u e s t e d i n p l a c e o f
i t e m 1 . W h i l e a s m a l l p o r t i o n o f t h e p r o p o s e d i t e m c o u l d b e
c o n s i d e r e d m a i n t e n a n c e , t h e p r o j e c t i s f o c u s e d o n a d d i n g p a v e m e n t
m a r k e r s a l o n g w i t h c e n t e r l i n e a n d e d g e l i n e s t r i p i n g w h e r e i t d o e s
n o t e x i s t .
S h o u l d t h e r e b e a n y q u e s t i o n s , o r i f a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n i s
r e q u i r e d p l e a s e c o n t a c t t h e u n d e r s i g n e d .
S i n c e r e l y ,
D u a n e F e s s e n d e n
P u b l i c W o r k s D i r e c t o r
E n c l o s u r e s
� P r i m e d o n R e c y c l e d P a p e r .
P . O . B o x 1 1 9 0 " C a l i m e s a , C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 3 2 0 " ( 9 0 9 ) 7 9 5 - 9 8 0 1
"
"
A g e n c y : C i t y o f C a l i m e s a
P r e p a r e d b y : D u a n e F c s s c n d e n
D a t e : 5 - 1 8 - 9 4
I T E M
N O .
1
2
3
4
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
M E A S U R E W L O C A L F U N D S P R O G R A M
F Y 1 9 9 4 - 1 9 9 5
P R O J E C T N A M E / L I M I T S
C o u n t y L i n e R o a d & C a l i m e s a B l v d .
D e l e t e I t e m # 1
C o u n t y L i n e R o a d f r o m 1 - 1 0 i n t e r c h a n g e e a s t t o
C a l i f o r n i a S t r e e t ( 1 . 8 m i l e s )
N O T E : T h i s p r o j e c t w i l l b e s h a r e d e q u a l l y w i t h
S T P f u n d s 8 9 2 , l o c a l s h a r e 1 1 2
V a r i o u s c i t y s t r e e t s
V a r i o u s C i t y S t r e e t s - I m p r o v e M a r k i n g s &
S i g n a g e
P R O J E C T T Y P E
S t o r m d r a i n i m p r o v e m e n t s
R e c y c l e d r e c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h
o v e r l a y
l i l y o f Y u c a i p a .
C r a c k f i l l & s l u r r y s e a l / o v e r l a y
I n s t a l l C e n t e r l i n e &
E d g e l i n e S t r i p i n g & P a v e m e n t
M a r k e r s .
U p g r a d e t r a f f i c c o n t r o l s i g n s
a s n e e d e d .
T O T A L C O S T
( $ 0 0 0 ' s )
2 5 0
3 0 0
6 0
1 0
P a g e j _ o f j _ _
M E A S U R E ' A '
F U N D S ( $ 0 0 0 ' s )
1 0 0
1 6 . 5
6 0
1 0
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: April 5, 1995
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Susan Cornelison, Senior Staff Analyst
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Co -Sponsorship of UCLA's Fall 1995 Symposium on "The
Transportation, Land Use and Air Quality Connection"
The UCLA Public Policy Program has asked RCTC to again cosponsor its Annual Policy
and Research Symposium on the Transportation, Land Use and Air Quality
Connection. The first four of these meetings (informally dubbed "The Arrowhead
Conferences" for the location where most have been held) concentrated on research
efforts in demand management, congestion pricing, land use strategies, and
implementation issues.
The 1995 symposium is scheduled for October 15 through 17, and will again be held
at UCLA's Arrowhead Conference Center where renovation has been completed. This
year the emphasis will be on issues related to actual implementation of some of the
new technologies now being promoted.
Attached is UCLA's letter of solicitation which further explains the intent and planned
content of this year's symposium. The conference is generally limited to 100
participants, who represent academia and decision -makers in both the public and
private sectors.
In past years, three representatives of the Commission, Board members as well as
staff, have been invited to participate. Further costs to the Commissions, per person
attending, is generally in the neighborhood of $400.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve the expenditure of $5,000 as cosponsor support of the
1995 Policy and Research Symposium on The Transportation, Land Use and Air
Quality Connection, and further authorize the attendance of three Commissioners or
staff members.
:jw
Attachment
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\UCLA-CON.SC
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES UCLA
•
BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO
March 9, 1995
Jack Reagan
Executive Director
Riverside Co. Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue, Ste. 100
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Jack:
SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ
UCLA EXTENSION
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024
Public Policy Program
10995 Le Conte Ave., #714
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Tel: (310) 825-7885
Fax: (310) 206-5066
On behalf of the UCLA Extension Public Policy Program and the Steering Committee for
the Annual Policy and Research Symposium on the Transportation, Land Use and Air
Quality Connection, we want to thank you for the substantive and financial contributions
that you and your organization have provided for this program.
This year more than ever, it is necessary for us to have your financial contribution to sustain
this program. The federal and state agencies, and the University of California
Transportation Center, who have provided the largest contributions, are pressed to
demonstrate that local and regional bodies, and private sector companies are making a
funding contribution. Your support have been and continues to be essential to insure that
we can sustain this effort.
This letter is a formal request for $5,000 from the Riverside County Transportation
Commission to insure that plans for the Fall 1995 Arrowhead program can proceed.
During the Steering Committee meeting held at the conclusion of the October 18-20, 1994
symposium, the group unanimously recommended that we continue this annual program.
Everyone was enthusiastic about the substance and the important interactions that occurred
of last Fall's retreat. Several ideas for next year's symposium were suggested.
All who have participated in this symposium series have greatly appreciated the funding that
your organization has provided to underwrite development and implementation of this
symposium. While there are plenty of conferences around, this invitational retreat program
is uniquely tailored to convene key researchers, analysts, policymakers, and advisors to help
analyze policy concepts, and implementation strategies for creatively addressing the complex
issues involved in making progress on air quality and mobility issues. By planning the
program collaboratively, we are able to carefully hone the topics and approaches, select the
best resource people, and employ a format that makes the most productive use of the
assembled talent. We have been able to draw upon the latest research, and pull together
the analyses needed to better inform the choices to be made. Another feature that helps
these efforts is the engagement of diverse interests in the exploration of strategies and
dialogue in a neutral setting. Searching out options that can gain the political support
needed to move constructive solutions forward is facilitated by these discussions.
As you know, several legislative measures, policy strategies, and implementation measures
have evolved directly from these retreats and the collaborative processes that we use in
developing these symposia. We are pleased to have been involved in convening you and
your colleagues in planning and implementing these symposia.
Based on some initial pledges of financial support, we have set the 1995 planning process
in motion. We now need to get formal funding commitments to insure that we can proceed
with planning and make the commitments needed to actually develop and conduct the 1995
program. If at all possible. we need to have a good idea of our funding commitments in
time for the next Steering Committee Meeting on March 30. 1995. If you need to present
this to a board meeting after this date, could you let us know when you think a decision may
be possible?
At the February 1, 1995 Steering Committee Meeting, we had a lively discussion of topics
for the next program, and selected October 15-17 for the 1995 retreat date. While the
Temecula location last year was satisfactory, most preferred to return to the setting at the
Arrowhead Conference Center. (UCLA has completed the construction undertaken last Fall
and it is even better equipped to accomodate our needs). The broad subject focus for next
year's symposium that received the most attention was to examine the roles of technology
in addressing our interests. (see the attached for more details.)
Using the ideas discussed at our February 1, 1995 meeting, Professor Martin Wachs, Joanne
and I have been working on a draft program outline for the Fall 1995 symposium. The
attached statement contains the results of the February discussion. By the March 30, 1995
Steering Committee meeting at the Oakland Airport, we will have a draft outline completed
to review and refine at that meeting. We will also begin identifying researchers and
discussants to invite. Your thinking on both substance and structure for these symposia have
been exceedingly valuable. We hope you can attend the March 30, 1995 session. If not,
we'll be in touch to discuss your ideas.
It is a pleasure to work with you and we look forward to talking with you soon.
Cordially,
700/6
LeRoy Graymer
Director
Public Policy Program
UCLA Extension
Attachment
cc: Susan Cornelison
s: \ppp\arr95\reagan.2
Joanne Freilich
Assistant Director
Public Policy Program
UCLA Extension
•
•
•
"
"
"
T e c h n o l o g y T h e m e s a n d I s s u e s t o b e A d d r e s s e d a t t h e A r r o w h e a d
1 9 9 5 T r a n s p o r t a t i o n , L a n d U s e a n d A i r Q u a l i t y S y m p o s i u m
O c t o b e r 1 6 - 1 8 , 1 9 9 5
M o s t s u g g e s t i o n s f o r t h i s y e a r ' s s y m p o s i u m t h e m e d i s c u s s e d a t t h e F e b r u a r y 1 , 1 9 9 5 S t e e r i n g
C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g c l u s t e r e d a r o u n d t e c h n o l o g y . T h e r e a s o n s e x p r e s s e d f o r t h i s f o c u s
i n c l u d e p r o m i s i n g d e v e l o p m e n t s i n t e c h n o l o g y a p p l i c a t i o n s , c o u p l e d w i t h c u r r e n t s k e p t i c i s m
f r o m s o m e s o u r c e s a b o u t t h e a b i l i t y o f b e h a v i o r a l c h a n g e s a l o n e t o a c h i e v e a i r q u a l i t y a n d
m o b i l i t y g o a l s / r e q u i r e m e n t s . A n o t h e r p o i n t m a d e b y s o m e i s t h a t t e c h n o l o g y a p p l i c a t i o n s
m a y a f f o r d l e s s c o s t l y m e t h o d s , i n t e r m s o f b o t h e c o n o m i c s a n d p o l i t i c s , f o r s u p p l e m e n t i n g
o r r e p l a c i n g t r i p r e d u c t i o n s t r a t e g i e s .
O n e c l u s t e r o f t e c h n o l o g i e s t o e x a m i n e i n c l u d e s t h o s e m e a s u r e s a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e c u r r e n t
f l e e t a n d m o d e s o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n t h a t c o u l d m o r e e f f i c i e n t l y c l e a n u p t h e v e h i c l e s m o v i n g
p e o p l e a n d g o o d s , s u c h a s v e h i c l e s c r a p p a g e a n d I / M o r r e m o t e s e n s i n g p r o g r a m s . A n o t h e r
c l u s t e r t h a t w e c o u l d a n a l y z e r e p r e s e n t s i g n i f i c a n t i n n o v a t i o n s a n d c h a n g e s i n t h e m e t h o d s
a n d m e a n s o f t r a n s p o r t . T h e s e m i g h t i n c l u d e I n t e l l i g e n t T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s ( I T S ) , a s
w e l l a s m a j o r s h i f t s i n t h e f u e l s a n d e f f i c i e n c i e s o f t r a n s p o r t v e h i c l e s .
S i n c e s e v e r a l m e m b e r s e x p r e s s e d i n t e r e s t i n e v a l u a t i n g I S T E A p r o j e c t s , t h e s y m p o s i u m
m i g h t a l s o e x a m i n e t h e r o l e s o f t e c h n o l o g y i n a t t a i n i n g c u r r e n t I S T E A r e q u i r e m e n t s , a s w e l l
a s i n f u t u r e a m e n d m e n t s t o b o t h I S T E A ( " N E X T E A " ) a n d t h e C l e a r A i r A c t . S o m e
m e m b e r s m e n t i o n e d c u r r e n t e f f o r t s t o o v e r h a u l p l a n n i n g m o d e l t e c h n o l o g i e s r e l a t e d t o
t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d l a n d u s e a s a v a l u a b l e t o p i c .
I n s u m m a r y , t h i s y e a r ' s p r o g r a m w i l l e m p h a s i z e t h e r o l e o f e x i s t i n g a n d p o t e n t i a l l y n e w
t e c h n o l o g i e s i n o v e r c o m i n g s e r i o u s a i r p o l l u t i o n p r o b l e m s , a n d i n m o l d i n g f u t u r e
r e l a t i o n s h i p s a m o n g t r a v e l , u r b a n f o r m , a n d t h e e n v i r o n m e n t . A s w a s t h e c a s e i n p a s t L a k e
A r r o w h e a d c o n f e r e n c e s , t h e f o c u s o n t e c h n o l o g y w i l l n o t b e n a r r o w - w e w i l l e x a m i n e
p o l i t i c a l a n d i n s t i t u t i o n a l i s s u e s , i n t e r e s t g r o u p p o s i t i o n s , a n d t h e w a y s i n w h i c h r e l a t i o n s h i p s
b e t w e e n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , l a n d u s e , a n d a i r q u a l i t y a f f e c t o u r v i e w s o f t e c h n o l o g y a n d v i c e
v e r s a . W e w i l l c a l l u p o n a c a d e m i c e x p e r t s t o s h a r e r e s e a r c h r e s u l t s w i t h u s , a s w e l l a s
a s k i n g p u b l i c o f f i c i a l s , c o n s u l t a n t s , a n d b u s i n e s s a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l s e c t o r r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s
t o h e l p c h a r t a c o u r s e w h i c h i s r e s p o n s i v e t o c u r r e n t p o l i c y c o n c e r n s .
P r o f e s s o r M a r t i n W a c h s , J o a n n e F r e i l i c h a n d L e R o y G r a y m e r a r e w o r k i n g o n a d r a f t
p r o g r a m o u t l i n e t o b e a d d r e s s e d i n d e t a i l a t t h e M a r c h 3 0 , 1 9 9 5 S t e e r i n g C o m m i t t e e
m e e t i n g b e i n g h e l d a t t h e O a k l a n d A i r p o r t .
3 / 6 / 9 5
AGENDAITEM #5G
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: April 5, 1995
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: W. Dean Martin, Controller
Louie Martin, Project Controls Manager
THROUGH: Jack Reagan, Executive Director --
SUBJECT: Monthly Cost and Schedule Reports
The attached material depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts
reported by routes, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the
Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value
approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and
the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending February 28,
1995.
Detailed supporting material for all schedules, contracts and cooperative agreements
is available from Bechtel staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission receive and file.
:jw
Attachments
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\MONTHR.LM
" "
R C T C M E A S U R E A H I G H W A Y / R A I L P R O J E C T S
B U D G E T R E P O R T B Y R O U T E
P R O J E C T
D E S C R I P T I O N
R O U T E 6 0 P R O J E C T S
P r e l i m i n a r y E n g r g / E n v i r o n
( R O 9 2 1 8 , 9 2 3 2 , 9 3 0 3 , 9 3 0 4 , 9 3 0 5 , 9 3 0 6 )
S U B T O T A L , R O U T E B 0
R O U T E 7 4 P R O J E C T S
C o o p e r a t i v e A g r e e m e n t
P r e l i m i n a r y E n g r g / E n v i r o n / F i n a l E n g r g
( R 0 9 0 1 2 , 9 1 0 6 , 9 1 1 5 , 9 1 1 7 , 9 1 2 2 )
C o n s t r u c t i o n & R O W ( R 0 9 2 2 5 , 9 2 2 6 , 9 2 0 6 , 9 2 0 7 )
( 9 0 1 2 C o n s t r . / R O W O n l y ) R 0 9 3 2 9 , 9 3 3 0 , 9 3 3 1 )
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 7 4
R O U T E 7 9 P R O J E C T S
P r e l i m i n a r y E n g r g / E n v i r o n . / R O W
( R O 9 1 1 1 , 9 1 1 2 , 9 1 1 6 , 9 1 1 8 , 9 3 0 1 , 9 3 0 2 , 9 3 3 7 , 9 3 0 6 )
L a m b s C a n y o n P r o j e c t ( R 0 9 4 2 3 , 9 4 2 9 , 9 5 1 8 )
S a n d e r s o n P r o j e c t ( R 0 9 0 1 1 )
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 7 9
R O U T E 8 6 P R O J E C T S
F i n a l D e s i g n ( R 0 8 9 0 7 )
C o n s t r u c t i o n & M i t i g a t i o n
( R 0 9 2 1 3 , 9 2 2 7 , 9 3 4 2 . 9 3 4 3 9 1 0 6 )
S U B T O T A L R O U T E 8 6
R O U T E 1 1 1 P R O J E C T S
C o r r i d o r S t u d y ( R 0 9 0 1 6 , 9 2 1 9 , 9 2 3 4 , 9 5 2 3 )
S U B T O T A L . R O U T E 1 1 1 .
$ 8 , 1 8 3 , 9 1 4
$ 1 1 , 5 4 x , 6 2 1 '
$ 8 , 9 6 1 , 3 6 6
5 2 1 , 0 7 3 , 7 0 3
$ 2 3 , 1 1 5 , 0 0 0
: 5 3 1 6 0 , 0 8 8
$ 1 , 2 1 9 , 0 0 0
5 2 0 , 1 1 5 , 0 7 8
( 4 )
$ 2 1 , 3 3 4 , 0 7 8
$ 1 , 8 5 4 , 1 1 5
$ 1 , 8 5 4 , 1 1 5
C O N T R A C T U R A L % C O M M I T T E D
C O M M I T M E N T S A G A I N S T A U T H .
T O D A T E A L L O C A T I O N
5 3 , 4 1 1 , 9 4 4
C O M M I S S I O N
A U T H O R I Z E D
A L L O C A T I O N
$ 3 , 8 3 9 , 2 9 5
$ 3 , 8 3 8 , $ 8 6 $ 3 , 4 1 1 , 8 4 4
( 4 )
$ 3 , 3 5 8 , 7 1 3 5 3 , 3 5 8 , 7 1 3
$ 8 , 1 8 3 , 9 1 4
S i 1 , 5 4 2 6 2 7 : : <
$ 8 , 4 5 5 , 6 4 9
$ 1 9 , 9 3 7 , 1 6 8
$ 1 3 , 0 2 2 , 5 2 2
6 4 1 , 4 1 5 , 3 3 9
5 1 , 2 1 9 , 0 0 0
$ 1 6 , 1 4 8 , 3 6 9
( 4 )
$ 1 7 , 3 6 7 , 3 6 9
$ 1 , 6 0 4 , 2 1 5
$ 1 , 6 0 4 , 2 1 0
P a g e 1 o f 4
8 8 . 9 %
8 8 . 9 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
E X P E N D I T U R E F O R % E X P E N D I T U R E S
M O N T H E N D E D E X P E N D I T U R E S T O - D A T E A G A I N S T
F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 9 5 T O D A T E C O M M T M N T S T O D A T E
$ 1 1 , 5 3 0
$ 1 1 , 5 3 0
5 7 , 3 9 7
1 0 0 . 0 % $ 7 3 9 7
9 4 . 4 %
9 4 . 6 %
5 6 . 3 %
7 7 9 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
8 0 . 3 %
8 6 . 5 %
m u % I
$ 2 7 , 7 3 1
5 4 2 , 1 0 8
5 1 0 5 5 7 2 8
3 1 , 1 2 5 , 5 6 7 :
$ 0
5 2 , 8 3 7 , 6 4 5
$ 2 , 8 3 7 , 8 4 5
5 2 , 9 3 7 , 2 7 7
$ 7 , 4 8 2 , 7 7 7
$ 1 O 4 2 0 , 0 8 4
$ 8 , 0 6 1 , 1 3 8
5 5 , 2 3 1 , 9 6 9
5 1 1 , 5 8 4 , 9 1 9
$ 2 4 . 8 7 8 , 0 2 6 '
$ 1 , 2 1 0 , 0 0 0
5 1 5 , 9 2 7 , 4 3 6
$ 1 7 ; 1 3 7 , 4 3 6
5 1 , 3 0 3 , 7 5 7
$ 1 , 3 0 3 , 7 5 7
8 3 . 2 %
8 1 . 2 %
8 7 . 5 %
9 1 . 4 %
9 0 . 3 %
9 5 . 3 %
2 6 . 2 %
8 9 . 0 %
6 0 . 1 %
9 9 . 3 %
9 8 . 6 %
9 8 . 7 %
8 1 . 3 %
RCTC MEASURE A HIGHWAY PR OJECTS
BUD GET REPORT BY ROUTE
PROJE CT
DESCRIPTION
ROUTE 91 PROJECTS
Magnolia to OCL (HOV) R08801,8901,8902,9001
9002,9133,9214,)
City of Corona (Smith, Maple, Lincoln IC) (3)
Magnolia to M ary
(R09101,9102,9103,9105,9212,9415, 9308)
SR71 to 1-15 (R09123,9128,9129,9130)
1-15 to 1-215 (R09131)
McKinley Undercrossing (R09326)
Van Buren Blvd. Frwy Hook Ramp
SUBTOTAL RO UTE 81:
1-215 PROJECTS
Preliminary Engrg/Environ. (R09008, 9018) (5)
Right -of -Way (R0 9003, 9004,9009,9336, 9222
0007PR1 /2& 0007PR3/4, 0007HS3-5,9411)
$UBTOTA1.1-it18
INTERCHA NG E IMPRO V. PROGRAM
Prelim. Engrg (PSR'S) (9107,9124-9127 )
RT91 Interchange (Maple & Lincoln)
Eastridge Overcrossing (R09132)
Galena Interchange (R0 9014)
Yuma IC Final Design (PS&E) R09428
Yuma IC (City of Norco R0 9237)
SUBTOTAL INTERCHANGE
(3)
BECHTEL PROJECT MGMT SERV.
(R0 8900,9000,9100,9200,9300,9400,9500
SUBTOTAL, BECHTBt.. .:
•
(1)
COMMISSION
AUTHORIZED
ALL OCATION
CONTRACTURAL % COMMITTED EXPENDITURE FOR % EXPENDITURES
COMMITMENTS AGAINST AUTH . MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES TO -DATE AGAINST
TO DATE ALL OCATION February 28, 1995 TO DATE COIVIMITMNTS TO DATE
630,982,198 627,055,658
68,104,137 67,015,976
610,812,508 610,530,460
63,393,807 $3,261,015
6108,792 6108,792
$1,614,951 61,614,951
62,300,000 62,300,000
5551018483 $49f586*852
z
$6,726,504 65,450,721
632,760,000 $32,760,000
$39,486,504 638,240,721
$3,666,628
$1,288,240
61,500,000
673,980
61,200,000
6650,000
$8,37g.
$10,098,912
810,098,612
$3,666,628
61,288,240
6900,000
673,980
61,099,975
6650,000
69,850,912
$9,850,912
Page 2 of 4
•
87 .3 %
86 .6%
97 .4%
96.1%
100 .0%
100.0%
80.1%•
81 .0%
100 .0%
100.0%
100.0 %
60.0%
100.0%
91. 7%
100.0%
6600,281
650,826
:$800,281
679,989
stomp
97. 5% $102,044
97. 554 5102,044
626,878,754 99 .3%
67,015,976 100 .0 %
67,220,743 68 .6 %
$2,642,335 81.0%
6108,792 100.0 %
61,370,299 84.9 %
$43,866s00 88.4►%
65,289,340 97 .0%
$30,695,836 93 .7 %
635,986,176 94.2%
61,807,046 49 .3%
61,288,240 100.0%
$73,980 100.0%
6245,089 22.3%
6280,000 43.1%
83,694,365 48 .1%
68,744,293 88.8%
$8744.294 88.8%
"
R C T C M E A S U R E A H I G H W A Y P R O J E C T S
B U D G E T R E P O R T B Y R O U T E
C O M M I S S I O N C O N T R A C T U R A L % C O M M I T T E D E X P E N D I T U R E F O R % E X P E N D I T U R E S
P R O J E C T A U T H O R I Z E D C O M M I T M E N T S A G A I N S T A U T H . M O N T H E N D E D E X P E N D I T U R E S T O - D A T E A G A I N S T
D E S C R I P T I O N A L L O C A T I O N T O D A T E A L L O C A T I O N F e b r u a r y 2 8 , 1 9 9 5 T O D A T E C O M M T M N T S T O D A T E
P R O G R A M P L A N & S E R V I C E S
P r o g r a m S t u d i e s
( R 0 9 0 0 6 , 9 0 1 0 , 9 0 1 3 , 9 1 0 8 , 9 1 1 9 , 9 2 2 7
9 3 0 7 , 0 0 0 7 P C 2 / 3 / 4 S A C O G / D T I M )
C o r r i d o r S t u d i e s
( R 0 9 0 1 7 , 9 1 1 0 , 9 1 2 0 )
M a p p i n g C o n t r o l / Q A ( R 0 9 0 0 7 )
S U B T O T A L P F t i G R A M A L A N $ : . 0 0 9 ,
P A R K - N - R I D E A N C E N T . P R O G R A M
( R 0 9 1 1 3 , 9 1 1 4 , 9 1 2 1 , 9 1 3 4 , 9 2 0 2 , 9 2 0 3 , 9 4 1 2 , 9 4 1 3
9 2 0 4 , 9 2 0 5 , 9 2 1 1 , 9 2 1 0 , 0 0 0 7 C A 2 / 3 , I m p r , 9 4 1 0
9 2 3 6 , 9 3 1 1 , 9 3 2 8 , 9 3 3 2 , 9 3 4 4 , 9 4 0 1 , 9 4 0 2 , 9 4 0 3 , 9 4 1 8
9 5 0 1 - 9 5 0 6 , 9 5 1 4 - 9 5 1 7 , 9 5 1 9 )
f 1 U B T 0 7 A L P A F t I 4 4 0 0 i r
C O M M U T E R R A I L
S t u d i e s / E n g i n e e r i n g
( R 0 9 0 2 1 , 9 1 0 5 , 9 2 2 0 , 9 3 0 9 , 9 3 1 9 , 9 3 2 1 , 9 3 1 0 )
9 3 2 5 , 9 2 3 5 , 9 3 2 3 , 9 3 2 7 , 0 0 0 7 R S 3 - B B & K o n l y ,
9 3 2 0 . 9 3 2 2 , 9 3 2 4 , 9 3 3 3 , 9 3 4 5 , 9 4 1 4 , 9 2 2 7 , 9 4 2 0 )
S t a t i o n / S i t e A c q / O P C o s t s
( R O 8 9 0 5 , 9 2 0 1 , 9 2 0 9 , 9 0 0 9 , 9 2 2 1 , 9 2 2 3 , 0 0 0 7 R F 3 / 4
9 2 2 4 , 9 4 1 7 , 0 0 0 7 R A 2 - 4 , 9 4 1 6 , 9 4 2 4 , 9 5 1 0 , I M P R .
0 0 0 7 R S 3 B B & K , 9 3 3 5 , 9 3 4 1 , 9 3 4 0 , 0 0 0 4 I P 3 , 9 5 2 1 )
S U B T O T A L C O M M U T E R R A I L
T O T A L S . :
$ 5 , 2 7 5 , 1 6 1
3 6 8 9 , 4 5 0
$ 2 , 6 8 3 , 7 2 9
9 8 , 6 4 8 , 3 4 0
. . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 4 , 6 0 5 , 7 5 9
$ 4 , 0 0 5 , 7 6 0
$ 3 , 9 7 2 , 2 7 3
$ 8 9 , 3 5 8 , 7 4 0
3 6 3 , 3 3 ' 1 , 0 1 9
: $ 3 O 7 . 4 4 . 6 6 5 8
N O T E : ( 1 ) L o a n a g a i n s t i n t e r c h a n g e i m p r o v e m e n t p r o g r a m s .
( 2 ) M a y b e r e d u c e d b y p a s s a g e o f S B 3 0 0 f u n d s .
( 3 ) R C T C p r o j e c t a c t u a l s h a r e a f t e r p o r t i o n a l l o c a t e d t o R T 9 1 , I C I m p
( 4 ) R C T C p o r t i o n o n l y o f C a f t r a n s C o n t r a c t
( 5 ) S A N B A G r e s p o n s i b l e f o r 2 5 %
R e p o r t d o e s n o t i n c l u d e L e g a l a n d F i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s o r s a l a r y a n d f r i n g e b e n e f i t s
A l l v a l u e s a r e f o r t o t a l P r o j e c t / C o n t r a c t a n d n o t r e l a t e d t o f i s c a l y e a r b u d g e t s .
$ 5 , 2 7 5 , 1 6 1
3 6 4 0 , 4 6 7
$ 2 , 6 8 3 , 7 2 9
$ 8 , 6 9 9 , 3 5 7 ;
$ 4 , 6 0 5 , 7 5 9
$ 4 6 0 8 T 6 9
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3 , 8 4 6 , 0 9 3
$ 8 9 , 3 5 8 , 7 4 0
9 8 3 , 2 0 4 , 8 3 3
. * 2 3 , 6 6 & , 8 0 . 7 :
r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( l o a n )
P a g e 3 o f 4
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 2 . 9 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
8 8 4 '
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 6 . 8 %
1 0 0 . 0 %
9 2 - 3 + 1 1 ; :
& L o c a l S t r e e t s &
$ 2 , 0 1 0
$ 1 , 5 9 4
$ 3 , t 3 0 4
$ 1 6 6 , 0 4 1
1 6 6
$ 4 1 , 8 3 3
$ 2 4 , 4 0 9
$ 6 6 , 2 4 2 '
9 2 , 9 8 2 , 6 9 5
R o a d s P r o g r a m .
$ 3 , 2 0 1 , 5 9 3
$ 6 2 8 , 9 0 0
$ 2 , 6 1 9 , 1 4 1
* 6 4 4 9 : 8 3 4
$ 3 , 8 0 5 , 0 6 4
9 3 6 0 6 : 1 1 8 3
$ 3 , 8 6 6 , 1 1 3
$ 8 1 , 6 4 7 , 4 2 6
3 8 5 , 5 t 3 , 5 3 9
5 2 4 4 , 6 3 6 , 5 7 9
6 0 . 7 %
9 8 . 2 %
9 7 . 6 %
1 8 0 %
8 2 . 6 %
8 2 . 6 %
1 0 0 . 5 %
9 1 . 4 %
8 t g f
S h r u g M o . E n d i n g 0 2 / 2 8 0 9 5
RCTC MEASURE A HIGHWAY/LOCAL STREETS & R OADS PROJECTS
BUDGET REPORT BY PR OJECT
EXPENDITURE FOR TOTAL % EXPENDITURES
PROJECT APPR OVED MONTH ENDED EXPENDITURES LOAN OUTSTANDING TO -DATE AGAINST
DESCRIPTION C OMMITMENT F ebruary 28, 1995 TO DATE BALANCE CO MMITMENT APPROVED CO MMIT .
CITY OF MURRIETA
Loan Agreement I-15/1-215
Interchange improvements (R09334)
SUBTOTAL MURRIETA LOAN
CITY OF CANYON LAKE
Final Design and Construction of
Railroad Canyon Rd Improvements (R09422)
SUBTOTAL CANYON LAKE LOAN
CITY OF CORO NA
Smith, Maple & Lincoln Interchanges &
Storm drainage structure
$5,212,623
36,212,623
$23,812,623
NOTE: (1) Loan against interchange improvement programs
(2) May be reduced by passage of SB 300 funds.
All values are for total Project/Contract and not related to fiscal year budgets.
SUBTOTAL CITY OF CORONA
$17,000,000
$17,000060
$1,600,000
51,6O0,GOQ
SO
TOTALS
SO
$2,379,711
$2,379,711;:
$1,600,000
$1.600.000
$5,212,623
$8,212,623
$9,192,334:
$1,140,487
$1,140,487;
$1,600,000
Site 00
$5,212,623
35;212,82*
3963,11.0.
$15,859,513
$15,369,513
$o
0
Page 4 of 4
14 .0 %
14.0%
100.0 %
100.0%
100 .0%
100.0%
38.6%
St atus M o. E ndi ng 02/28/95
•
•
•
1992
J IA 15IO IN ID J
1993
IF IM IA IM IJ IJ IA IS 10 IN ID IJ IF IM IA
RT15 AT YUMA DR - CONSTRUCT INTERCHANGE
RT74 I15 TO 7TH ST - WIDEN TO 4 LANES
1994 1995
IMIJ IJ IA ISIO IN ID JIFIMIAIMJJIJIAISS
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
RT74 G ST TO I215 - WIDEN TO 4 LANES
RT79 GILMAN SPR TO 1ST ST - WIDEN TO 4 LANES
mom* PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
RT79 KELLER ST TO NEWPORT ST - WIDEN TO 4 LANES
i
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
RIGHT OF WAY (ENGINEERING ONLY)
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY 1
IO
IN ID IJ
IF
1996
IMIAIMIJIJIAIs10INIDIJIF
IM
1
IA IM I
FINAL DESIGN AND P
RIGHT OF WAY
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
RIGHT OF WAY
RT 79 NEWPORT TO NEWPORT GAP
CONSTRUCTION
(CONS
(CON
RT91 MAIN ST TO MAGNOLIA AVE - MEDIAN HOV
CONSTRUCTION
RT91 ORANGE COUNTY LINE TO MAIN ST - MEDIAN HOV
I CONSTRUCTION
RT91 MAGNOLIA AVE TO MARY ST - MEDIAN HOV
I FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION ONLY
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVI
JO
RT91 SR71 TO I15 - OUTSIDE WIDENING
JO
CONSTRUCTION
RT111 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS ( 6 LOCATIONS )
RT215 E60/215 JCT TO SBCL - WIDEN TO 8 LANES
Plot Date 20MAR9S
Data Date 17MAR95
Project Start 2JAN89
Pr oject Finish 19JUN98
(c) Primavera Systems, Inc.
1 1 Sssary Bwit ,iy Dates
Cr itical DaeIDnator
II astl•sFIs9 Activity
PROJECT STUDY REPORT (PSR) ONLY
PRELIMINARYENGINEERING& ENVIRONMENTAL
I
Pm Gz
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTN COMMISSN Sheet 2
RCTC LEAD AGENCY
SUMMARY SCHEDULE — BY RCTC
F:
997 1998 1999
IJ
1 IJ IA IS!O IN ID IF IM IA IM IJ IJ IA IS lo IN ID
IJ IF IM IA IM IJ
i&E
CONSTRUCTION
TRUCTION NOT PROGRAMED AS YET)
5TRUCTION NOT PROGRAMED AS YET)
ONMENTAL
1 COMPLETE
I COMPLETE
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
BECHTEL CORP
Rte
Revision
Checked
Approved
WStRSVep TIALC Ia,m T 2 001
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
J AISIO N D
J F M A MIJ J AISIOIN D
JIFIMIA M J J A S 0 N D
J F M
A M J J A 5 0 N D
J F M AIMIJ J AIS OINID
JIFIM A MIJIJIAISIO N D
J F M AIM1JIJIAIS 0 N D
JIFIM AIM J
RT215 60/91/215 CONN & 60/91/215 TO E60/215 JCT
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
PRELIMINARY
COMMUTER RAIL DOWNTOWN
INTERIM
ENGINEERING
DESIGN AND
OF WAY
STATION
& ENVIRONMENTAL
PS&E
JOB COMPLETE
PRELIMINARY
FINAL
I RIGHT
I I CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER RAIL PEDLEY STATION
ENGINEERING
DESIGN
OF WAY
& ENVIRONMENTAL
AND PS&E
JOB COMPLETE
PRELIMINARY
FINAL
I RIGHT
I� 1 CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER RAIL WEST CORONA STATION
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
AND PS&E
,
I FINAL DESIGN
I CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER RAIL LA SIERRA STATION
Icy
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
FINAL DESIGN
& ENVIRONMENTAL
AND PRE
pifl
CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER RAIL
CITY OF PERRIS STATION
I I STUDY
COMMUTER RAIL - HIGHGROVE
LAYOVER & CONN TRACK
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
AND PS&E
PRELIMINARY
FINAL DESIGN
I CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER RAIL - SAN JACINTO RAIL LINE
STUDY
1
I STUDY
Plot Date 20MAR95
Data Date 17MAR95
Project Start 2JAN89
Project Finish 19JUN98
c 1 Pr Systems, Inc.
racz 9 .t 2 of 2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTN COMMISSN
RCTC LE D AGENCY
SUMMARY SCI E — BY RCTC
BECHTEL CORP
i sur ,rr Ber l EsrT oern
'1 or'tiu1Dar
Progra m, Bar
oim
Date
Revisio n
Checked
Approved
F, WSERS\M ARTIKEVIUNETx ooz
RT60 VALLEY WAY TO UNIVERSITY -WIDEN TO 6 LANES
RT60 I215 TO REDLANDS BLVD - WIDEN TO 6 LANES
RT60 VALLEY WAY TO JCT I15 - WIDEN TO 8 LANES
RT86 DILLON RD TO AVE 58 -WIDEN
RIGHT OF WAY
CONSTRUCTION
RT86 AVE 66 TO AVE 58 - WIDEN
FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY
RT86 AVE 82 TO AVE 66 - WIDEN
FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY
Plot Date 20MAR95
Data Date 17MAR9S
Pr oJect Star t 2JAN89
Pro ject Finish lAJUN98
(c) Primavera S stems Inc.
RIGHT OF WAY
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING g ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY
CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING g ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING g ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL DESIGN AND PS&E
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTN COMMISSN Sheetlof
CALTRANS LEAD AGENCY
SUMMARY SCHEDULE - BY CALTRANS
CONSTRUCTION
JOB COMPLETE
JOB COMPLETE
BECHTEL CORP
Revision
E i�O ERSV YW r N �N:.... : 2 001
Check ed
Approved
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
J A S 0 N D
J F IM A M J J A S O IN ID
J IF JM IA IM J J A S IO IN D
J F M
A M IJ J A IS 0 N D
J IF M IA IM IJ J A S JO JN ID
J IF MIA M IJ IJ IA IS O N ID
J F M IA IM JJ IJ IA IS IO N D
J IF IM IA IM IJ
RT 60 GALENA INTERCHANGE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL
I 1
RT74 7TH ST TO G ST(IN PERRIS)
- WIDEN TO 4 LANE
JOB COMPLETE -CITY OF PERRIS
I CONSTRUCTION
RT79 SANDERSON
BRIDGE REPLACMNT(S.JACINTO
ENGINEERING
RIVER)
& ENVIRONMENTAL
DESIGN AND PS&E
RIGHT OF WAY
CONSTRUCTION
JOB COMPLETE -COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
mmI PRELIMINARY
I FINAL
I
RT91 SMITH/MAPLE/LINCOLN
OVERCROSS-WIDEN TO 4 LN
CONSTRUCTION
JOB COMPLETE -CITY OF CORONA
RT91 VAN BUREN BLVD/FWY HOOK RAMP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
& ENVIRONMENTAL
DESIGN AND PS&E
OF WAY
CITY OF RIVERSIDE
I FINAL
RIGHT
I CONSTRUCTION
Plot Date 20MAR95
Data Date 17MAR95
Pr oject Star t 2JAN89
Pr oje ct Finish 19JUN98
(C l Pr� Systems, Inc.
e1iGZ steer ' 01 '
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTN COMMISSN
OTHER AGE S AS LEADS
SUMMARY SCH — BY OTHERS
BECHTEL CORP
5-y ari[Ki U°Tes
�''t�"� °i"9"'�
® Progr esIII s,� i�
Date
Revision
Checked A roved'
SWOTR2 OOI
F: \US(RSW4RTI$i('
AGENDA ITEM #5H
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : D e a n M a r t i n , C o n t r o l l e r
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : S i n g l e S i g n a t u r e A u t h o r i t y R e p o r t
F o r t h e p e r i o d e n d i n g M a r c h 3 1 , 1 9 9 5 , t h r e e c o n t r a c t s w a s e x e c u t e d u n d e r s i n g l e
s i g n a t u r e a u t h o r i t y g r a n t e d t o t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n . T h o s e
c o n t r a c t a r e o u t l i n e d o n t h e a t t a c h e d r e p o r t . T h e r e r e m a i n s a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 3 5 , 0 0 0
c a p a c i t y t o e n t e r i n t o a d d i t i o n a l c o n t r a c t s f o r t h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e f i s c a l y e a r .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e c e i v e a n d f i l e .
: j w
A t t a c h m e n t
F : \ U S E R S \ P R E P R I N T \ A P R . 9 5 \ S I N G S I G . D M
" " "
C O N T R A C T S A U T H O R I Z E D U N D E R
S I N G L E S I G N A T U R E A U T H O R I T Y
A S O F M A R C H 2 9 , 1 9 9 5
C O N S U L T A N T
D E S C R I P T I O N C O N T R A C T E X P E N D E D
O F S E R V I C E S A M O U N T A M O U N T
R i v e r s i d e D o w n t o w n A s s o c i a t i o n M a n a g e V e n d o r a t R a i l S t a t i o n s 0 0
D e l e u w C a t h e r E n g i n e e r i n g R t 1 1 1 M o n r o e I n t e r s e c t i o n 1 0 , 0 0 0 0
P a r s o n s B r i n k e r h o f f C o n s t M a n a g e m e n t R a i l P r o p e r t y 5 , 0 0 0 0
0
T O T A L
1 5 , 0 0 0 0
A M O U N T A V A I L A B L E J A N U A R Y 1 , 1 9 9 5
T H R U J U N E 3 0 , 1 9 9 5 5 0 , 0 0 0
A M O U N T R E M A I N I N G T H R U J U N E 3 0 , 1 9 9 5 3 5 , 0 0 0
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : S h i r l e y M e d i n a , S t a f f A n a l y s t I I
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : 1 9 9 5 / 9 6 L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d s a n d S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m
P l a n n i n g P r o j e c t s
T h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) a n n o u n c e d a C a l l f o r
P r o j e c t s f o r t h e 1 9 9 5 / 9 6 L o c a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n F u n d s ( L T F ) a n d S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
P r o g r a m ( S T P ) P l a n n i n g f u n d s . T h e c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s r e q u e s t e d l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n s t o
s u b m i t t h e i r p l a n n i n g p r o j e c t s t o t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e s u b r e g i o n a l a g e n c y . T h e R C T C h a s
r e c e i v e d a l i s t o f p l a n n i n g p r o j e c t s ( A t t a c h m e n t A ) f r o m t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n c i l
o f G o v e r n m e n t s ( W R C O G ) a n d t h e C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s
( C V A G ) f o r t h i s c y c l e .
T h e a d o p t e d R C T C p o l i c y d e l e g a t e s r e s p o n s i b i l i t y t o W R C O G a n d C V A G f o r s o l i c i t i n g
p r o j e c t s f r o m l o c a l a g e n c i e s a s w e l l a s d e v e l o p i n g t h e i r o w n p r o j e c t s f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n
a n d s u b m i t t i n g t h e m t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n i n a p a c k a g e . T h e i n t e n t o f t h i s d e l e g a t i o n
i s t o p r o v i d e a c h e c k o n c o o r d i n a t i o n o f t h e l o c a l a g e n c y p r o j e c t s w i t h t h e o n g o i n g
W R C O G a n d C V A G p l a n n i n g e f f o r t s a n d h o p e f u l l y t o s c r e e n o u t d u p l i c a t i v e a n d l o w
p r i o r i t y p r o j e c t s f r o m t h e l i s t o f p r o j e c t s s u b m i t t e d .
F i f t y p e r c e n t o f t h e L T F p l a n n i n g f u n d s a r e m a d e a v a i l a b l e u n d e r a c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s o n
a n a n n u a l b a s i s . T h i s f i s c a l y e a r ' s f u n d i n g a v a i l a b i l i t y f o r t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y a r e a a n d C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a r e a a r e e s t i m a t e d a t $ 2 6 6 , 9 6 4 . 0 0 a n d $
1 0 6 , 5 3 6 . 0 0 r e s p e c t i v e l y . T h e C V A G h a s i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e y p l a n o n u s i n g F i s c a l
Y e a r s ' ( F Y ) 1 9 9 5 / 9 6 a n d F Y 9 6 / 9 7 L T F p l a n n i n g f u n d s o n t h e p r o j e c t t h e y h a v e
s u b m i t t e d t h i s y e a r . T h e C o m m i s s i o n m a y w i s h t o c o n s i d e r a d o p t i n g a b i e n n i a l c y c l e
r a t h e r t h a n a n a n n u a l c y c l e f o r L T F p l a n n i n g f u n d s . A b i e n n i a l c y c l e w o u l d a s s i s t i n
a m e n d i n g p r o j e c t s i n t o t h e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( R T I P ) d u e
t o t h e f i n a n c i a l l y c o n s t r a i n e d r e q u i r e m e n t .
T h e r e m a i n i n g a v a i l a b l e f u n d s f r o m t h e s i x y e a r I n t e r m o d a l S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
E f f i c i e n c y A c t ( I S T E A ) f o r S T P p l a n n i n g p r o j e c t s i n t h e W e s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a n d
C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y a r e $ 5 6 8 , 5 8 1 a n d $ 6 7 8 , 2 2 8 r e s p e c t i v e l y . T h e l i s t o f p r o j e c t s
s u b m i t t e d b y t h e C O G ' s d o n o t e x c e e d t h e s e a m o u n t s . T h e S T P p l a n n i n g f u n d s
r e p r e s e n t 1 5 % o f t h e S T P d i s c r e t i o n a r y f u n d s .
F : \ U S E R S \ P R E P R I N T \ A P R . 9 5 \ L T F S T P . S M
Page 2
At last month's Commission meeting, the Commission approved criteria to assist in
the selection of planning projects. Since the requested funds do not exceed the
amount of available funds, the criteria will not be applied.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve the STP and LTF planning projects identified on
Attachment A; and consideration of a biennial cycle for programming LTF Planning
Funds.
:jw
Attachment
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\LTFSTP.SM
"
"
"
L T F A N D S T P D I S C R E T I O N A R Y P L A N N I N G F U N D S F Y 9 5 / 9 6 - 9 6 / 9 7
A G E N C Y P R O J E C T T Y P E / C A T E G O R Y F I S C Y R L T F
S T P - D i s c . T O T A L
1
W R C O G
S C A G P L A N I M P L E M E N T A T I O N
9 5 / 9 6
5 7 5 , 0 0 0
3 7 5 , 0 0 0
2
L I V E A B L E C O M M U N I T I E S P R O G R A M
9 5 / 9 6
S 3 7 , 0 0 0
5 3 7 , 0 0 0
3
C M P T E C H N I C A L A S S I S T A N C E
9 5 / 9 6
5 5 0 , 0 0 0
S 5 0 , 0 0 0
4
A I R Q U A L I T Y
9 5 / 9 6
S 4 0 , 0 0 0
3 4 0 , 0 0 0
5
M A R C H A I R F O R C E B A S E C I R C U L A T I O N S T U D Y
9 5 / 9 6
S 6 , 4 9 7
$ 6 , 4 9 7
6
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N N I N G S T U D I E S
9 5 / 9 6
$ 5 7 , 6 5 0
5 5 7 ; 6 5 0
7
F I N A N C I N G / P R I O R I T I Z A T I O N S T R A T E G Y - C I P
9 5 / 9 6
S 1 5 0 , 0 0 0
3 1 5 0 , 0 0 0
8
A R E A P L A N N I N G D I S T R I C T T R A F F I C M O D E L S
9 5 / 9 6
S 2 5 0 , 0 0 0
3 2 5 0 , 0 0 0
9
C A J A L C O C O R R I D O R S T U D Y
9 5 / 9 6
5 1 0 0 , 0 0 0
S 1 0 0 , 0 0 0
1 0
V A N B U R E N C O R R I D O R S T U D Y
9 5 / 9 6
$ 5 3 , 0 0 0
3 5 3 , 0 0 0
1 1
C O R O N A T R A N S I T S T U D Y _
9 5 / 9 6
3 1 5 . 0 0 0
3 1 5 , 0 0 0
A G E N C Y T O T A L 5 2 6 6 , 1 4 7
3 5 6 8 , 0 0 0 5 8 3 4 , 1 4 7
1 2
R C T C
S C A Q M D P M 1 0 T E C H N I C A L E N H A N C E M E N T P R O G R A M
9 5 / 9 6
5 2 0 , 0 0 0
5 2 0 , 0 0 0
1 3
R I V C O U N T Y O F F O F E D . G I S C O N T R A C T
9 5 / 9 6
3 1 5 , 0 0 0
3 1 5 , 0 0 0
A G E N C Y T O T A L 3 3 5 , 0 0 0
$ 0 3 3 5 , 0 0 0
1 4
C V A G
P R O J E C T ' 2 0 2 0
9 5 / 9 6
5 1 0 6 , 5 3 6
S 2 0 0 , 0 0 0
3 3 0 6 , 5 3 6
1 5
P R O J E C T 2 0 2 0
9 6 / 9 7
3 1 0 6 , 0 0 0 *
S 4 0 3 , 2 9 1
5 5 0 9 ; 2 9 1
A G E N C Y T O T A L 3 1 0 6 , 5 3 6
3 6 0 3 , 2 9 1 3 8 1 5 , 8 2 7
F Y 9 5 / 9 6 T O T A L S
* F o r F Y 9 6 / 9 7 L T F C a l l F o r P r o j e c t s
D L / P L A N N I N G
3 4 0 7 , 6 8 3 $ 1 , 1 7 1 , 2 9 1
$ 1 , 6 8 4 , 9 7 4 I
AGENDA ITEM #6B
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Mike Davis, Environmental Manager
Tom Horkan, Bechtel Project Manager
THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: Sunrise Way/ Palm Canyon Drive Intersection - Amendment Number 2
Adjustment to Authorized NBS/Lowry Contract Amount (RCTC
Agreement No. RO-92-19)
The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and NBS/Lowry (consultant)
have previously entered into Agreement No. RO-92-19 dated April 21, 1992 for
preliminary engineering services for several Measure "A" Projects on Route 111. A
subsequent Amendment No. 1 to that Agreement (RO-92-19) dated November 15,
1994 was entered into by RCTC and the Consultant for final design services
specifically for the Sunrise Way/Palm Canyon Drive Intersection in the City of Palm
Springs.
April 5, 1995
Based on additional work needs RCTC and the Consultant now desire to amend the
scope -of -services, compensation and payment amounts set forth in the original
Agreement and Amendment No. 1.
RCTC directed NBS\Lowry to prepare the attached proposed Amendment No. 2
(attached as NBS\Lowry letter requesting Contract Change Order dated March 10,
1995). The Amendment is for additional work to the Amendment No. 1 scope cover
the cost of accommodating changes in original project scope and revisions to
engineering documents relating to the Sunrise Way/ Palm Canyon Intersection
improvement project in the City of Palm Springs.
The estimated cost of additional work under proposed Amendment No. 2 is
$8,557.26.
Funds for the extra work required will come from the Route 111 design budget for
1994-1995. Funds were budgeted for a pool of ts on Rute 111 at the
beginning of the year. Sufficient funds will be available toccover his work from the
Route 111 design budget as defined following the Commission approved Mid -year
budget adjustments in March.
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\NBSAM2.MD
Page 2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve the NBS/Lowry contract Amendment No. 2 for
$8,557.26 and a total contract value not -to -exceed $524,601.26. All terms and
conditions of the original agreement (RO-92-19) and subsequent amendment
(Amendment No. 1) will remain in effect except as revised by this amendment
(Amendment 2). No further Amendments to this agreement are anticipated.
:jw
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\NBSAM2.MD
AGENDA ITEM #6C
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: April 5, 1995
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Karl Sauer, Bechtel Project Coordinator
Tom Horkan, Bechtel Project Manager
THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: Route 91 Auxiliary Lane and Soundwall Prioritization Study
The Measure A Highway Plan stipulates the addition of up to 2 lanes in each direction
on Route 91 from Magnolia Avenue to the 60/91/215 interchange. In September of
1990, the Commission authorized Agreement No. RO-9101 with Greiner, Inc. to
perform preliminary engineering and environmental studies to add one lane in each
direction in the median of the existing 6 -lane freeway, Route 91, through the City of
Riverside. Various alternatives were studied, from reduced to full standard, with a
focus on identifying a project that met the criteria for a Negative Declaration
Environmental review process, and that could be constructed in the short term, to
provide some immediate congestion relief for commuters.
In June, 1991 representatives from RCTC, Caltrans, the City of Riverside, and the
County of Riverside met to discuss potential options for the Route 91 projects. They
agreed that the best way to provide some relief for congestion on the 91 Freeway
was to proceed with an interim project, an HOV lane in each direction in the median,
from Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street on Route 91. The section from Mary Street to
the 60/91/1-215 Interchange was not included in the interim project because it would
require extensive outside widening, the replacement of several bridge structures, the
purchase of additional right-of-way, and could not be environmentally cleared with a
Negative Declaration. The widening from Mary Street to the 60/91/215 Interchange
is still intended tobe constructed under the Measure A Plan and will be programmed
for environmental clearance and construction as a separate project.
During the engineering design phase for the interim HOV project, RCTC, Caltrans, and
the City of Riverside were unable to resolve all of the issues regarding treatment and
location of soundwalls within the project limits. In order not to hold up construction
of the interim project, the agencies agreed to take the soundwalls out of the interim
project and treat them as a separate project to be constructed when the issues were
resolved.
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\RT91 PRIT.KS
Page 2
There has been some delay in getting started on work to determine where the
soundwalls in the interim project reach will be placed. A primary concern has been
trying to determine where the ultimate locations for the walls will be so they can be
constructed where they will not need to be torn down and reconstructed for future
widening projects. The latest update of the Measure A Vision and Strategy paper
shows an extremely high cost for widening to add a second lane in each direction
along this entire section of Route 91. The Measure A and STIP revenues projected for
the foreseeable future are not sufficient to cover these estimated construction costs
for the addition of the second lane along this section of Route 91. In keeping with the
intent of the Measure A Highway Program, the Commission has budgeted funds for
this fiscal year to determine what additional improvements can reasonably be made
in this section of Route 91 to reduce congestion. The proposed study will focus on
determining where auxiliary lanes can be constructed to provide some additional
congestion relief, and will identify the locations for constructing the soundwalls.
The Route 91 interim HOV project will be completed in the next month unless we are
further delayed by what seems to be a never ending series of rain storms. A recent
article in the Press Enterprise regarding improvements on the 91 freeway seemed to
indicate that the Magnolia to Mary HOV project is "As wide as it gets". The headline
seemed somewhat misleading to staff in that we do expect there will be additional
widening to provide auxiliary lanes and the project from Mary Street to the
60/91/215 Interchange is still programmed for construction through the Measure A
Highway Program.
Because it is uncertain when the funds will be available to construct the Ultimate 10 -
lane facility staff was directed to request of Greiner to submit a proposal for a
Prioritization Study which will look at various alternatives for the placement of
auxiliary lanes, to enhance operation of the existing facility, and placement of
soundwalls, from Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street in the City of Riverside that will be
compatible with the ultimate 10 -lane future facility. A detailed review of the
operational benefit, compatibility between auxiliary lane and soundwall location and
construction, and ultimately costs will be studied in this report.
Attached is Greiner's Draft Scope of Work and Cost proposal for $89,958.78. This
is within Greiner's original budget to design the soundwalls for the interim project
that was set aside when the Commission deleted the soundwalls from the interim
project.
Sufficient funds are available to cover this work in the Route 91 design budget
approved by the Commission in the FY 94/95 Mid -year budget adjustments in March.
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\RT91 PRIT.KS
Page 3
•
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission authorize the Executive Director to use the existing soundwall
design budget in Greiner's Contract No. RO-9101 in an amount not to exceed
$89,958.78 for base work and $10,041.22 for extra work to perform an auxiliary
lane and soundwall prioritization study for Route 91 between Magnolia Avenue and
Mary Street in the City of Riverside.
:jw
Attachment
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\RT91 PRIT.KS
March 20, 1995
•
•
STATE ROUTE 91 AUXILIARY LANE AND SOUNDWALL
PRIORITIZATION STUDY
MARY STREET TO MAGNOLIA AVENUE
Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), requests the preparation of an
Auxiliary Lane and Soundwall prioritization study for the upgrading of State Route 91 from
Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street, in Riverside County.
Since 1990, planned improvements for this segment of State Route 91 have included
construction or design of a median HOV lane as well as selected auxiliary lanes. It is
expected that all of these improvements will be implemented by this year, 1995.
These improvements were made in response in growth in the Inland Empire and the
resulting congestion and safety problems. This growth has continued in the last decade and
it is predicted that this growth will increase at an even higher rate over the next twenty
years. Future improvements will be required to improve and/or maintain the level of
service within the project's limits.
Consequently, Greiner prepared a Project Study Report (PSR) whose objective was to
provide additional capacity and enhance safety features in conformance with the Route 91
Concept Report (Transportation Concept Report) dated July 1991. The proposed
improvements will increase capacity and circulation between Routes 91/215 and 91/15, in
conformance with air quality requirements.
The Ultimate Project, as identified by the Route Concept Report, is the only alternative
which generally provides an acceptable LOS D for forecasted year 2015 traffic demand.
However, no funds are currently available, from Caltrans and/or the Riverside County
Transportation Commission (RCTC) Measure A, to build this alternative. The PSR
prepared by Greiner discusses improvement alternatives.
These alternatives include placing soundwalls at ultimate locations compatible with a 10 lane
ultimate standard facility. It further includes the placement of auxiliary lanes and
soundwalls also to the ultimate 10 lane standard location.
This study will look at the ultimate soundwall locations as well as opportunities to place
auxiliary lanes to provide operational improvements to the existing system. A detailed review
of the operational benefit, compatibility between auxiliary lane and soundwall location and
construction, and ultimately costs will be studied in this report.
1
March 20, 1995
1. DATA COLLECTION AND ASSEMBLY
1.11 RIGHT-OF-WAY MAPS
It is anticipated that the right-of-way mapping that is available in the existing PSR will be
sufficient. Should additional ROW maps be necessary, they will be obtained from Caltrans.
ROW mapping will be confirmed with Caltrans to ensure that the most up-to-date
information is available. Property ownership from assessor's records, improvements, AP
numbers, easements and parcels sizes will be researched and shown on the maps.
Coordination:
Product:
1.2 AS -BUILT MAPPING
Possibly Caltrans
Plot of Existing ROW Maps
As -build mapping including the HOV widening of the freeway and adjoining roadways will
be obtained. Additional as-builting of the HOV widening will be obtained from Caltrans
as necessary. Greiner will utilize information assembled from the previously completed
PSR.
Coordination: Caltrans
Product: As -Built Maps
1.3 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE
Field reconnaissance of the project will be performed. It is important to ensure that as -built
mapping and actual field conditions are exactly compatible.
Coordination:
Product:
1.4 BASE MAPPING
Internal
Field Reconnaissance
Base plans will be needed at 1" =100' scale throughout the segment. Base plans will be
prepared from existing files available from past engineering efforts. The work effort will
include the following:
• Place Geometric information from as -built plans on sheets in CADD.
• Plot ROW information on base map in CADD.
•
•
•
2
March 20, 1995
•
2. PRELIMINARY AUXILIARY LANE LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION
From the available PSR that Greiner has prepared, Greiner will identify potential Auxiliary
lane locations. Understanding that the PSR primarily deals with the ultimate 10 lane
section, Greiner will attempt to identify locations where auxiliary lane additions would
enhance traffic operations of the existing system.
Coordination: RCTC
Product: Auxiliary Lane Layouts
3. PRELIMINARY SOUNDWALL LAYOUT AND IDENTIFICATION
Greiner will utilize the existing PSR and transfer all of the soundwalls that were proposed
to layout sheets that would show both potential auxiliary lane locations as well as potential
soundwall locations.
Coordination: RCTC
Product: Layouts Showing Auxiliary Lanes
and Soundwalls
4. TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR AUXILIARY LANE ADDITIONS
4.1 MAINLINE ANALYSIS WITHIN THE POTENTIAL AUXILIARY LANE
LOCATION (EXISTING & 2015)
The evaluation of freeway mainline segments in the auxiliary lane area will be conducted
according to criteria contained in Chapter 3 of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).
The mainline level of service (LOS) will be found by comparing the peak directional
volumes in terms of passenger cars per hour per lane to the threshold means service flows
(MSF) that were recently updated by the Highway Capacity Committee. This analysis will
be conducted with and without auxiliary lanes for existing condition and future year 2015.
Some forecasting may need to be performed for the purposes of the signing traffic to
potential auxiliary lanes.
Coordination: Possibly Caltrans for Updated
Existing Future Forecasts
Product: Level of Service Analysis With and
Without Auxiliary Lanes for
Existing and Future Year 2015
Conditions.
3
March 20, 1995
4.2 RAMP MERGE AND DIVERGE AREAS (EXISTING & 2015)
Ramp merge and diverge aces operations will be analyzed at auxiliary lane locations
according to the methodologies contained in Chapter 5 of the 1985 HCM. Again, the with
and without auxiliary lane scenarios will be analyzed for existing conditions and future year
2015.
Coordination: Possibly Caltrans for Updated
Existing and Future Forecasts
Product:
4.3 FREEWAY WEAVING
Level of Service Analysis With and
Without Auxiliary Lanes for
Existing and Future Year 2015
Conditions.
The analysis of freeway weaving sections will be conducted by using criteria contained in
Chapter 4 of the 1985 HCM. Freeway weaving will be analyzed for the with and without
scenario for both the exiting condition and future year 2015.
Coordination: Possibly Caltrans for Updated
Existing and Future Forecasts
Product:
5. COST ESTIMATES
5.1 AUXILIARY LANES BY SEGMENT
Level of Service Analysis With and
Without Auxiliary Lanes for
Existing and Future Year 2015
Conditions.
Each auxiliary lane will be considered a segment and will be costed in accordance with
project study report guidelines. Cost estimates will be prepared on a unit price basis for
construction costs. Separate costs for ROW will be identified. ROW costs will be used in
accordance with the project study report for this area. A 25% contingency will be used for
the development of the cost estimate.
Coordination:
Product:
Internal
Auxiliary Lane Cost by Segment
4
March 20, 1995
•
•
•
5.2 SOUNDWALLS BY SEGMENT
Soundwall costs will be developed in conformance with the project study report guidelines.
Cost estimates will be prepared on a unit price basis for each of the walls. A 25%
contingency will be used for development of the cost estimate for this report. Costs
estimates will be developed on a segment basis.
Coordination: Internal
Product: Soundwall Costs by Segment
6. RCTC/CITY OF RIVERSIDE COORDINATION
For budgeting purposes, a series of 10 meetings will be attended by Greiner staff with either
the City of Riverside, RCTC, or anyone else at RCTC's request.
Coordination: RCTC/City of Riverside/Other
Product: Meeting Minutes
7. PRIORITIZATION REPORT (PRELIMINARY)
The data collection and assembly products, the traffic analysis products, the cost estimates
products, and meeting minutes will all be compiled and evaluated for the purposes of
establishing a prioritization report. Soundwall and auxiliary lane packages will be suggested
in this preliminary report and submitted to RCTC for review.
Coordination: RCTC
Product: Prioritization Report
8. PRIORITIZATION REPORT (FINAL)
Greiner will prepare a final prioritization report from the review comments received from
the preliminary prioritization report as reviewed by RCTC and any other agency per
RCTC's request.
Coordination: RCTC
Product: Prioritization Report
5
" "
H O U R S / C O S T P R O P O S A L
S T A T E R O U T E 9 1 A U X I L I A R Y L A N E A N D P R I O R I T I Z A T I O N R E P O R T
M I L E S T O N E
P R I N C I P A L
P R W M G R
S R . P R W E N G R
P R W E N G R
E N G R
T E C H
1 . D A T A C O L L E C T I O N & A S S E M B L Y
1 . 1 R O W M A P S
1 . 2 A S - B U I L T M A P P I N G
1 . 3 F E L D R E C O N N A I S S A N C E
1 . 4 B A S E M A P P P I N G
2 . P R E U M I N A R Y A U X I L I A R Y L A N E L A Y O U T / I D E N T I F I C A T I O N
3 . P R E U M I N A R Y S O U N D V I A L U L A N E L A Y O U T / D E N T T F I C A T I O N
4 . 0 T R A F F I C S T U D E S F O R A U X I U A R Y L A N E A D D I T I O N S
4 . 1 M A I N U N E A N A L Y S I S W I T H I N T H E P O T E N T I A L A U X I U A R Y
L A N E L O C A T I O N ( E X I S T I N G & 2 0 1 5 )
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
2
6
2
8
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 0
2 0
8
2 0
4 0
4 0
2 4
C L E R I C A L
H O U R S
2 0
2 0
8
2 0
4 0
4 0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4 0
4 0
4 0
4 0
2 4
2 4
1 6
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
8 2
8 z
6 0
8 2
1 1 4
1 1 4
5 2
4 . 2 R A M P M E R G E A N D D P V E R G E A R E A S ( E X I S T I N G & 2 0 1 5 )
4 . 3 F R E E W A Y W E A V I N G
5 . 0 C O S T E S T I M A T E S
0
2
0
2 4
0
2
0
2 4
8
0
8
0
1 6
2
5 2
1 e
2
5 2
5 . 1 A U X I U A R Y L A N E S B Y S E G M E N T
5 . 2 S O U N D W A L L S B Y S E G M E N T
6 . R C T C / C f 1 Y O F R I V E R S I D E C O O R D I N A T I O N
7 . P R I O R I T R A T I O N R E P O R T ( P R E U M I N A R Y )
I L P R I O R I T I Z A T I O N R E P O R T ( F I N A L )
H O U R S
2 4
2
2
4
4
6 4
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
2 4
2 4
0
2 4
1 6
4 0
4 0
0
2 4
1 6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
8
0
0
3 2
4 0
6
0 0
6 9
1 2 0
1 0 6
5 e
3 4
1 2 4
0
3 0 8
2 9 2
0
2 7 2
8 8
1 1 1 8
L A B O R R A T E
A M O U N T
O V E R H E A D 1 . 5 8 9 2
S U B T O T A L
F E E @ 1 0 . 5 %
S U B T O T A L C O S T
8 5 8 . 0 0
8 1 , 9 7 2 . 0 0
8 3 , 1 3 3 . 9 0
8 5 , 1 0 6 . 0 0
8 5 3 e 1 2
8 4 7 . 0 0
8 5 , 8 2 9 . 0 0
8 9 , 2 6 1 . 8 6
8 1 5 , 0 9 9 . 6 6
8 1 , 5 8 4 . 4 4
8 3 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 2 6 . 0 0
8 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 0
8 1 2 , 7 2 6 . 3 1
8 2 0 , 7 3 4 . 3 1
8 2 , 1 7 7 . 1 0
8 2 0 . 0 0
8 5 , 8 4 0 . 0 0
8 9 , 2 8 0 . 9 3
8 1 5 , 1 2 0 . 9 3
8 1 , 5 8 7 . 7 0
8 1 7 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 0 . 0 0
8 2 0 . 0 0
8 5 , 4 4 0 . 0 0
8 8 , 6 4 5 . 2 5
8 1 4 , 0 6 5 . 2 5
8 1 , 4 7 8 . 9 5
8 1 7 . 0 0
8 1 , 4 9 6 . 0 0
8 2 , 3 7 7 . 4 4
8 3 , 8 7 3 . 4 4
8 4 0 6 . 7 1
D I R E C T C O S T � 1 0 %
T O T A L
$ 5 , 6 4 2 . 0 2
8 1 6 , 6 7 4 . 2 9
8 0 . 0 0
8 2 2 , 9 1 1 . 4 2
8 1 6 , 7 0 8 . 6 3
8 0 . 0 0
8 1 5 , 5 6 4 . 2 0
8 4 , 2 6 0 . 1 5
8 8 1 , 7 8 0 . 7 1
8 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 7
J : E N G R \ 0 0 8 0 0 H 1 \ S R 9 1 - 3 9 5 . W K 3
8 8 9 , 9 5 6 . 7 8
AGENDA ITEM #7A
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : M a r i l y n W i l l i a m s , S e n i o r S t a f f A n a l y s t
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : F Y 9 4 / 9 5 C o m m u t e r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s , I n c . C o n t r a c t F u n d i n g I s s u e s
A t i t s J u l y 1 9 9 4 m e e t i n g , t h e C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v e d S u r f a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ( S T P )
f u n d s i n t h e a m o u n t o f $ 1 7 6 , 6 8 8 f o r t h e p r o v i s i o n o f r e g i o n a l r i d e s h a r e s e r v i c e s i n R i v e r s i d e
C o u n t y t h r o u g h C o m m u t e r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S e r v i c e s , I n c . ( C T S ) . T h i s y e a r , i n a s p i r i t o f
c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h C a l t r a n s / S a c r a m e n t o , t h e f i v e c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s ( C T C ' s )
e n t e r e d i n t o a s i n g l e c o n t r a c t w i t h C a l t r a n s t o p a s s t h e c o m b i n e d c o u n t y f u n d s t o t a l i n g $ 3 . 4
m i l l i o n f r o m t h e C T C ' s t h r o u g h C a l t r a n s t o C T S .
P e r C a l t r a n s r e q u e s t , C T S e x e c u t e d a n o r i g i n a l c o n t r a c t t h a t i n c l u d e d o n l y t h e F Y 9 4 / 9 5
C a l t r a n s f u n d s t o t a l i n g $ 4 . 4 m i l l i o n w i t h t h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t t h e c o u n t y f u n d s w o u l d b e
a d d e d b y a m e n d m e n t . C a l t r a n s D i s t r i c t # 7 , w h o s e r v e s a s t h e C T S c o n t r a c t a d m i n i s t r a t o r ,
p r e p a r e d t h e f u n d i n g a m e n d m e n t a n d s u b m i t t e d i t t o S a c r a m e n t o f o r a p p r o v a l i n N o v e m b e r .
T h e i m m e d i a t e p r o b l e m i s t h a t d e s p i t e s e v e r a l e f f o r t s f r o m D i s t r i c t 7 , S a c r a m e n t o h a s n o t
p r o c e s s e d t h e a m e n d m e n t t o a l l o w t h e p a s s t h r o u g h o f t h e C T C ' s 3 . 4 m i l l i o n t o C T S . I f t h e
s i t u a t i o n i s n o t r e s o l v e d i n t h e n e x t w e e k o r t w o , C T S w i l l n o t h a v e s u f f i c i e n t c a s h t o k e e p
i t s d o o r s o p e n t h r o u g h A p r i l .
U p o n r e v i e w o f e x i s t i n g c o n t r a c t s , C o m m i s s i o n l e g a l c o u n s e l h a s i n d i c a t e d t h a t s h o u l d
C a l t r a n s n o t p r o c e s s t h e a m e n d m e n t i n a t i m e l y m a n n e r , t h e y w o u l d b e , i n e f f e c t , i n b r e a c h
o f t h e i r c o n t r a c t w i t h R C T C . C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f , a s w e l l a s t h e o t h e r i m p a c t e d C T C ' s a n d
S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s , h a v e b e e n s e e k i n g t o b r e a k
t h r o u g h t h e C a l t r a n s S a c r a m e n t o b o t t l e n e c k .
S h o u l d t h e e f f o r t s t o f o r c e C a l t r a n s / S a c r a m e n t o t o p r o c e s s t h e f u n d i n g a m e n d m e n t f a i l , t h i s
a g e n d a i t e m h a s b e e n p r e p a r e d a s a p l a c e h o l d e r t o s e e k C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l t o t a k e a c t i o n
a s m a y b e n e c e s s a r y t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e R C T C a p p r o v e d S T P f u n d s a r e p a i d t o C T S p u r s u a n t
t o t h e a d o p t e d F Y 9 4 / 9 5 w o r k p l a n . S t a f f w i l l p r o v i d e a s t a t u s r e p o r t .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n c o n s i d e r e d t a k i n g a c t i o n , a s m a y b e r e c o m m e n d e d b y s t a f f , t o e n s u r e
t h e p a y m e n t o f $ 1 7 6 , 6 8 8 i n S T P f u n d s t o C T S p u r s u a n t t o t h e a d o p t e d F Y 9 4 / 9 5 w o r k p l a n .
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: April 5, 1995
TO: Budget and Finance Committee
FROM: Jack Reagan, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Amendment to Capital Improvements Agreement
Presented to the Commission is the final negotiated agreement related to the capital
improvements as well as cap on escalated costs for the San Bernardino Subdivision.
The Commission has previously approved the agreement in concept. A copy of the
agreement is included in the agenda packet. Staff will brief the Committee on specific
details of the agreement at the meeting on April 5th.
nk
Attachment
Mao L€ b
•
•
•
SECOND AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT
(this "Second Amendment"), dated as of " March 22, 1995, is by
among The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company" ("Santa
Fe"), Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC"), Orange
County Transportation Authority ("OCTA"), Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (as successor to Los
Angeles County Transportation Commission) ("LAMTA"), San
Bernardino Associated Governments ("SANBAG") and Southern
California Regional Rail Authority ("SCRRA"). RCTC, OCTA, LAMTA,
SANBAG, and SCRRA " sometimes " are referenced collectively
herein as ""Agencies" and individually as "Agency". Capitalized
terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meaning specified in the Capital Improvements Agreement.
RECITALS
A. Santa Fe and " Agencies " are parties to a Capital
Improvements Agreement (San Bernardino Subdivision) dated as of
October 30, 1992, as amended by " A First Amendment to Capital
Improvements Agreement dated as of December 10, 1992 (as so
amended, the "Capital Improvements Agreement"), relating toi
among other things. certain improvements that may be made to
Santa Fe's San Bernardino Subdivision located in the counties of
San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange and Los Angeles, California.
B. Santa Fe and the Agencies desire to amend the Capital
Improvements Agreement in certain respects as provided herein.
follows:
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, " the parties hereto hereby agree " as
1. As set forth below in this Amendment. the Agencies have
authorized and shall pan to Santa Fe a total of 581,600,000 for
(i) completion of " the Facilities and Improvements included in
the Adjusted Base Case Level and the Low Case Level and the
proiects listed on Exhibit E hereto, (ii) completion of the Green
River Cannon Proiect (described in Section 3 hereof). and (iii)
certain environmental and land acauisitiop costs described in
Section 4 hereof) (the protects included in clauses (i) and (ii)
of this sentence shall be referenced collectively as the
"Protects"). Such payment shall be made on the terms of the
Capital Improvements Agreement. as modified by this Amendment.
In addition to tide 581.600,000. the Agencies shall be responsible
for all costs ar}sina from anv New Environnenta} ReauiTements
(defined in Section 2 hereof) and. as provided in Section
3.1(b)(})(4) of the Capital Improvements Agreement, anv Agency
reauestina a Chance Ordel- shall be responsible for the costs of
such Change Order. Notwithstanding the other provision of this
Agreement, the Agencies acknowledge that Santa Fe may reallocate
LA3-669780.V8
03/16/95
among the different items described in this Section 1 the
581,600,000 payment (plus any additional amount described in this
Section 1 that is received from the Agencies), provided. however.
that such reallocation shall in no event (A) entitle Santa Fe to
additional payments from the Agencies, (B) accelerate the
payments due Santa Fe under the Capq.tal Improvements Agreement.
(C) increase or decrease the liability of anv Agency to Santa Fe
from what the Agency's liability would have been had the
reallocation not occurred, or (D) alter the rights of the
Agencies with respect to each other.
" 2. Subsection 3.1(b)(ii) and clauses (1). (2)- and (3) of
Subsection 3.1(b)(i) of the Capital Improvements Agreement are
hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
'Ib) With respect to the Facilities and Improvements in the
Adjusted Base Case Level and " the Low Case Level and the
Drolects listed in Exhibit E to this Agreement (collectively. the
"Initial Facilities and Improvements"):
Santa Fe shall complete construction of all of the
Initial Facilities and Improvements in accordance with the
terms of the Agreement, " end shall use its reasonable
efforts to complete the Initial Facilities and Improvements
in accordance with the schedule " set forth on Exhibit F to
this Agreement. The Agencies acknowledge that Santa Fe
shall not be responsible for anv delays to the construction
schedule caused by parties or events that are beyond Santa
Fe's control, where Santa Fe is using reasonable efforts in
the circumstances to overcome such delays. The Agencies
shall to pay Santa Fe a fixed amount of " 879.000,000 (plus
the additional amounts referenced in Sections 3.1(b)(2) and
3.5 of the Agreement) for such work, of which approximately
" 159,089,883 already has been paid to Santa Fe as of "
March 1. 1995. The Agencies shall continue to make progress
payments to Santa Fe for such work in accordance with
Article 4 " of this Agreement, provided that the total of
all such progress payments, plus the amounts already paid
Santa Fe, shall in no event exceed " 179.000.000 (plus the
additional amounts referenced in Sections 3.1(b)(2)- and 3.5
of the Agreement).
(2) If the total Costs of the Initial Facilities and
Improvements " are less than $79,000,000, then upon
completion of all such work, the Agencies shall pay the
balance of such amount to Santa Fe. However, if the total
Costs of the jnitial Facilities and Improvements " exceed
,579,000v_0, Santa Fe shall be solely responsible for such
excess. Costs "(other than costs arising from anv Change
Order reauested by anv Aaencv4 or from anv New Environmental
Requirement). Santa Fe's obligation to complete the Initial
Facilities and Improvements " shall be unaffected by the
fact that Costs have exceeded " S79.000.000. Costs incurred
LA3-669780.V8
2
03/16/95
"
"
"
f o r C h a n g e O r d e r s o r f o r N e w E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e q u i r e m e n t s
s h a l l b e p a i d s e p a r a t e l y b y t h e A g e n c i e s a n d s h a l l n o t b e
i n c l u d e d i n d e t e r m i n i n g w h e t h e r t h e C o s t s o f t h e I n i t i a l
F a c i l i t i e s a n d I m p r o v e m e n t s h a v e e x c e e d e d $ 7 9 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 f o r
t h e p u r p o s e s o f t h i s S e c t i o n 3 . 1 ( b ) ( 2 ) . I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e
$ 7 9 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 p a y m e n t f o r c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e I n i t i a l F a c i l i t i e s
a n d I m p r o v e m e n t s . t h e A g e n c i e s s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e
c o s t . i f a n v . o f a n v e n v i r o n m e n t a l s t u d i e s , e n v i r o n m e n t a l
m i t i g a t i o n s t e p s . a n d a n v a d d i t i o n a l l a n d a c q u i s i t i o n o r
c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t s c a u s e d b y e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e q u i r e m e n t s , t o
t h e e x t e n t t h a t s u c h e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e q u i r e m e n t s r e l a t e t o
c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e I n i t i a l F a c i l i t i e s a n d I m p r o v e m e n t s a n d
w e r e n o t k n o w n b y S a n t a F e o n o r b e f o r e D e c e m b e r 1 9 . 1 9 9 4
a n d w e r e n o t i n a n y e v e n t a l r e a d y i n c l u d e d w i t h i n t h e s c o p e
o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s c o n t e m p l a t e d b y S a n t a F e a n d t h e
A g e n c i e s p r i o r t o t h a t d a t e ( t h e " N e w E n v i r o n m e n t a l
R e a u i r e m e n t s " ) . S a n t a F e s h a l l n o t i f y t h e S C R R A p r o m p t l y
u p o n l e a r n i n g o f a n v c o n d i t i o n o r p r o p o s a l t h a t w o u l d
c o n s t i t u t e o r c o u l d l e a d t o a N e w E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e q u i r e m e n t
a n d s h a l l n o t c o m m i t o r a a r e e t o a n v p r o p o s e d N e w
E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e q u i r e m e n t . o r s t a r t w o r k o n a m a t t e r t h a t i s
s u b i e c t t o a N e w E n v i r o n m e n t a l R e q u i r e m e n t . u n l e s s a n d u n t i l
t h e r e q u i r e m e n t h a s b e e n a p p r o v e d b y t h e S C R R A o n b e h a l f o f
t h e A g e n c i e s , w h i c h a p p r o v a l s h a l l n o t b e u n r e a s o n a b l y
w i t h h e l d o r d e l a y e d . T h e A a e n c i e s a c k n o w l e d g e . h o w e v e r .
t h a t i f t h e A a e n c i e s d o n o t a p p r o v e a N e w E n v i r o n m e n t a l
R e q u i r e m e n t . S a n t a F e . w i t h o u t a n v l i a b i l i t y t h e r e f o r t o t h e
A a e n c i e s . m a y s t o p w o r k o n t h e a f f e c t e d } . m p r o v e m e n t u n t i l
t h e m a t t e r i s r e s o l v e d . a n d n o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e o t h e r
p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t , t h e A a e n c i e s s h a l l
r e i m b u r s e S a n t a F e f o r i t s a c t u a l c o s t s i n c u r r e d a s a r e s u l t
o f a n y s u c h w o r k s t o p p a g e .
( 3 ) F o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f d e t e r m i n i n g C o s t s t o b e p a i d f o r
t h e , I n i t i a l F a c i l i t i e s a n d I m p r o v e m e n t s " , S a n t a F e a n d t h e
A g e n c i e s a g r e e t h a t t h e y s h a l l u s e a c t u a l c o s t s i n c u r r e d ,
w i t h o u t a n y a d j u s t m e n t s f o r i n f l a t i o n o r o t h e r w i s e , a n d
t h e r e f o r t h e c o n c e p t f o r m e r l y i n t h e C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s
A g r e e m e n t o f " A d j u s t i n g " C o s t s p u r s u a n t t o t h e C o n s t r u c t i o n
I n d e x s h a l l n o t a p p l y t h e r e t o . " "
3 . A n e w S e c t i o n 3 . 4 i s h e r e b y a d d e d t o t h e C a p i t a l
I m p r o v e m e n t s A g r e e m e n t a s f o l l o w s :
" 3 . 4 G r e e n R i v e r C a n y o n P r o j e c t . S a n t a F e h a s b e e n a d v i s e d
b y g o v e r n m e n t a l a u t h o r i t i e s t h a t i n o r d e r t o c o n s t r u c t t h e
b r i d g e s u p p o r t s a n d r e l a t e d i m p r o v e m e n t s f o r t h e s e c o n d
t r a c k t h r o u g h t h e G r e e n R i v e r C a n y o n a n d a c r o s s t h e S a n t a
A n a R i v e r ( w h i c h w o r k i s i n c l u d e d i n t h e " I n 4 . t i a l
F a c i l i t i e s a n d I m p r o v e m e n t s ) , S a n t a F e a l s o w i l l n e e d t o
c o n s t r u c t t h e e m b a n k m e n t a n d s t r u c t u r e s f o r a p o t e n t i a l
t h i r d t r a c k t h r o u g h t h e G r e e n R i v e r C a n y o n a n d a t h r e e - t r a c k
w i d e b r i d g e a n d b r i d g e s u p p o r t s t r u c t u r e s a c r o s s t h e S a n t a
L A 3 - 6 6 9 7 8 0 . V 8
3
0 3 / 1 6 / 9 5
Ana River (which work is not included in the " Initial
Facilities and Improvements) (such additional work is
referenced herein as the "Green River Canyon Project"). The
Agencies agree to pay " at this time $1.8501000 of the
Costs of the Green River Canyon Project (which project,
however, specifically does not include installation of rails
or related improvements), " which payment shall be made in
accordance with Article 4 of the Agreement" as work on the
Green River Canyon Proiect proaresses. Santa Fe shall pay
at this time the balance of the Green River Canyon Proiect
costs above $1.850,000. provided, however, the Agencies
acknowledge and aaree that before any of the Aaencies may
operate Stage 5 Level train service over this segment of the
San Bernardino Subdivision (i) the Aaencies must reimburse
Santa Fe for the total actual cost of completing the Green
River Canyon Proiect, less the $1.850,000 already paid. and
(ii) any other Staae 5 Level improvements reauired to be
made on this segment must have been completed."
" 4. A new Section 3.5 is hereby added to the Capital
Improvements Agreement as follows:
"3.5 Settlement of Certain Land Acquisition and
Environmental Mitigation Costs. In settlement of disputes
related to responsibility for certain land acquisition and
environmental mitigation costs, the Agencies agree to pay to
Santa Fe as part of the $81.600,000 set forth in Section 1
hereof (i) $350,000 toward the cost of acquiring additional
land in the vicinity of the La Mirada Yard, and (ii)
$400,000 toward certain environmental mitigation costs
related to construction of the " Proiects. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the Agreement", such payments by
the Agencies shall have the following effect:
(A) The $350,000 land acquisition payment referenced
in clause (i) above shall constitute the Agencies' full
and final contribution to land acquisition " costs j
connection with the Proiects, and Santa Fe shall be
responsible for, all other land acquisition " costs
(other than those arising from any New Environmental
Requirement), if any. in connection therewith.
(B) The $400.000 environmental mitigation " payment
referenced in clause (ii) above shill constitute the
Agencies' full and final contribution with respect to
the costs of environmental std+es, environmenta.
mitigation steps. and any additional land acquisition
or construction costs arisina from reaul.rements imposed
in connection with the Proiects. excluding, however.
costs. if any. arisina from any New Environmental
Requirement. The Aaencies shall be responsible for
the costs arising from any New Environmental
•
•
•
LA3-669780.V8
4
03/16/95
Reauirement, and Santa Fe shall be responsible for all
other environmental mitigation costs. if anv. in
connection with the Proiects."
" 5. A new Section 3.6 is hereby added to the Capital
Improvements Agreement as follows:
"3.6 Additional Improvements Made by Santa Fe as part of
the Adiusted Base Case plus Low Case Work. Following a
detailed review by the Agencies of the specific capital
improvements that Santa Fe has made under this Agreement
(documented in a report entitled "Comprehensive Analysis of
Improvements on the Santa Fe San Bernardino Subdivision"
dated December. 1994 and prepared by DeLeuw, Cather), the
Agencies and Santa Fe agree that Santa Fe has completed, and
the Agencies have fully paid for, " the specific capital
improvements set forth on Exhibit E to the Agreement (which
exhibit is attached to this Second Amendment), which
improvements were not necessary to be completed as part of
the Initial Facilities and Improvements A. Santa Fe agrees
that the Agencies will not be billed any additional costs
beyond the $81,600,000 referenced 4.n Section 1 hereof (plusi
the additional amounts referenced in Section 1 hereof), for
the capital improvements }fisted on Exhibit
payment for such work is included in the " $79.000.000ncies
amount referenced in Section 3.1(b) " Jiereof. The Agencies
acknowledge that Santa Fe also has made certain other
capital improvements that are not specified to be completed
as part of completion of the Initial Facilities and
Improvements and for which the Agencies have not been
billed, but which will be billed to the Agencies if and when
the Agencies are ready to commence the specific level of
Agency Train service for which these improvements are
necessary under the Agreement."
6. Section 3.1(d) of the Capital Improvements Agreement is
hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following
Sections 3.1(d) and (e):
"(d) The total of all payments to Santa Fe from the Agencies
under clauses (1) and (2) of Section 3.1(b) and Sections 3.4
and 3.5 of the Agreement will not exceed " $81.600,000
(which cap shall not apply to costs arising from anv New
Environmental Reauirement which shall be paid by the
Agencies pursuant to Section 3.1(b)(2)1 or to anv Change
Orders, which shill be the responsibility of the Aaencv or
Aaenc+es reauestina the Change Order). Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in this Agreement,
to the first $62,818,000 }n Costs incurred bylSanta ) hFeeinect
connection with the Facilities and Improvements covered by
clauses (1) and (2) of Section 3.1(b), each Agency (other
LA3-669780.V8
5
03/16/95
than SCRRA) shall be liable to Santa Fe only for the portion
of such $62,818,000 shown as allocated to such Agency on
Exhibit C to the Agreement, (ii) with respect to the
remaining sums that become due to Santa Fe pursuant to
clauses (1) and (2) of Section 3.1(b) and Sections 3.4 and
3.5 of the Agreement (i.e., a possible maximum of
518.782,000, plus anv cost arising from anv New
Environmental Requirement), each Agency (other than SCRRA)
shall be liable to Santa Fe (either directly or as a member
of the SCRRA) only for an amount not to exceed the sum shown
below opposite its name:
RCTC: " 57,429,945.00
OCTA: " S5,627,495.00
LAMTA: " 53.988.980.00
SANBAG: S1.735.580.00
SCRRA shall be liable to Santa Fe for the full " S81.600,000
referenced 4.n Section 1 hereof, plus anv cost ar4.s+na from
anv New Environmental Reauirement. SCRRA's liability shall
be reduced dollar for dollar by the amount of each payment
by any other Agency of such Agency's share of the
581.600,000. Once Santa Fe has received such " S81.600.000
(plus anv costs arising from anv New Environmental
Reauirement) in payments from the Agencies, none of the
Agencies shall have any further liability to Santa Fe for
its construction of the Proiects (but this provision shall
not affect any Agency's rights against another Agency if it
pays more than the amount specified above opposite its name)
except with respect to Chancle Orders reauested by an
Agency and with respect to reimbursement to Santa Fe for the
portion of the Green River Canyon Proiect costs paid by
Santa Fe pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Agreement. The
Agencies acknowledge that the foregoing limitations do not
apply to the costs of anv Change Orders reauested by an
Aaencv or Agencies. and that the Aaencv or Agencies
requesting the Change Order shall be responsible for the
full cost thereof.
(e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, each Agency (other than SCRRA1 shall be liable to
Santa Fe only for the Costs of the Facilities and
Improvements above the Adjusted Base Case Level and Low Case
Level as are allocated to " the Agency or Agencies by
agreement between Santa Fe and such Agency " or Agencies
(or, with respect to the Green River Cannon Proiect. as are
allocated to the Agencies by this Second Amendment). but
only to the extent such Costs are to be borne by the
Agencies pursuant to Section 3.1(c) A or pursuant too the
terms of the agreement between the Aaencv or Agencies and
Santa Fe."
•
LA3-669780.V8
6
03/16/95
"
"
" 7 . A 1 1 r e f e r e n c e s i n t h e C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s A g r e e m e n t t o t h e
" A g r e e m e n t " o r t h e " C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s A g r e e m e n t " s h a l l b e
d e e m e d t o b e r e f e r e n c e s t o t h e C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s A g r e e m e n t a s
a m e n d e d b y t h i s S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t .
" 8 . A l l r i g h t s a n d o b l i g a t i o n s o f S a n t a F e a n d e a c h o f t h e
A g e n c i e s u n d e r t h e C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t s A g r e e m e n t t h a t a r e n o t
e x p r e s s l y a m e n d e d b y t h i s S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t s h a l l r e m a i n u n c h a n g e d
b y t h i s S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t .
" 9 . T h i s S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t s h a l l b e b i n d i n g u p o n a n d s h a l l i n u r e
t o t h e b e n e f i t o f S a n t a F e a n d e a c h o f t h e A g e n c i e s a n d t h e i r
r e s p e c t i v e s u c c e s s o r s o r p e r m i t t e d a s s i g n s .
1 0 . T H I S S E C O N D A 1 ( E N D X f f i N T S H A L L B E G O V E R N E D B Y A N D
C O N S T R U E D I N A C C O R D A N C E W / T E T E E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A .
_ . T h i s S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t m a y b e e x e c u t e d i n a n y n u m b e r o f
c o u n t e r p a r t s , n o o n e o f w h i c h n e e d b e e x e c u t e d b y a l l o f t h e
p a r t i e s , e a c h o n e o f w h i c h s h a l l b e d e e m e d a n o r i g i n a l , b u t a l l
o f w h i c h w h e n t a k e n t o g e t h e r s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e b u t o n e a g r e e m e n t .
S i g n a t u r e p a g e s f r o m o n e d u p l i c a t e o r i g i n a l m a y b e a t t a c h e d t o
o t h e r d u p l i c a t e o r i g i n a l s o f t h i s S e c o n d A m e n d m e n t t o f o r m o n e
d o c u m e n t .
I N S S
A m e n d m e n t h a v e = c a u s e d * t h e i r F d u l y e p a r t i e s a u t h o r i z e d o r e p i s r e s e n t a t d
e x e c u t e i t a s o f t h e d a y a n d r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s t o
y e a r f i r s t �� s e t f o r t h h e r e i n .
S A N T A F E :
A G E N C I E S :
T H E A T C H I S O N , T O P E K A A N D S A N T A R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y
F E R A I L W A Y C O M P A N Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
B y : B y :
N a m e :
N a m e :
T i t l e : T i t l e :
L A 3 - 6 6 9 7 8 0 . V 8
7
0 3 / 1 6 / 9 5
A
LA3-669760.V8
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
By:
Name:
Title:
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
By:
Name:
Title:
'SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED
GOVERNMENTS
By:
Name:
Title:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL
RAIL AUTHORITY
By:
Name:
Title:
Ex 4:L:46 KOf ;Pi C(144G4t
8 03/16/95
•
"
"
"
L A 3 - 6 8 0 2 5 2 . V 1
2
O R A N G E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
A U T H O R I T Y
B y :
N a m e :
T i t l e :
S A N B E R N A R D I N O A S S O C I A T E D
G O V E R N X E N T B - -
B y :
N a m e :
T i t l e :
S O U T H E R N C A L I F O R N I A R E G I O N A L
. R A I L A U T H O R I T Y
B y :
N a m e :
T i t l e :
0 3 / 1 6 / 9 5
March 22, 1995
The Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe
Railroad Company
1700 East Golf Road
Schaumburg, Illinois 60173
Attn: Mr. R.E. Hagberg
Dear Mr. Hagberg:
At the request of The Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe
Railroad ("Santa Fe"), the undersigned agree to meet with Santa
within 60 days after the date of delivery of this letter to
discuss in good faith the issue of what the Agencies and Santa Fe
meant to include by use of the term "material" in Section 3.3 of
the Capital Improvements Agreement dated as of October 30, 1992.
Section 3.3 provides for the allocation of "proceeds from salvage
of material in connection with construction of [the San
Bernardino Subdivision Facilites and Improvements]".
In addition, RCTC and OCTA, with support from SCRRA,
agree within said 60 -day period to meet and discuss with Santa Fe
in good faith Santa Fe's request to delete Sections 5.3(b)(i),
(ii) and (iii) of the Shared Use Agreement (San Bernardino
Subdivision) dated as of October 30, 1992, which provisions deal
with Santa Fe's maintenance obligations on the Subdivision.
Very truly yours,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
By:
Name:
Title:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY
By:
Name:
Title:
[see next page ...]
LA3-680252.V1
03/16/95
AGENDA ITEM #8B
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : S u s a n C o r n e l i s o n , S e n i o r S t a f f A n a l y s t
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : T u s t i n C o m m u t e r R a i l S t a t i o n
I n o r d e r t o e x p e d i t e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a c o m m u t e r r a i l s t a t i o n a l o n g t h e R i v e r s i d e t o
I r v i n e r o u t e a t T u s t i n , t h e C o m m i s s i o n v o t e d t o o f f e r t h e C i t y o f T u s t i n b o r r o w i n g
c a p a c i t y w i t h i n R C T C ' s c o m m e r c i a l p a p e r p r o g r a m . M e m b e r s o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n m e t
w i t h T u s t i n ' s m a y o r a n d o t h e r c i t y o f f i c i a l s .
A s t h e a t t a c h e d l e t t e r f r o m A s s i s t a n t C i t y M a n a g e r C h r i s t i n e S h i n g l e t o n e x p l a i n s ,
T u s t i n d o e s n o t f i n d t h e t e r m s a n d c o n d i t i o n s o f s u c h a l o a n f a v o r a b l e a n d i s t h e r e f o r e
d e c l i n i n g t h e o f f e r . T h e C i t y w o u l d , h o w e v e r , b e w i l l i n g t o d i s c u s s " t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f
a f a i r s h a r e n o n - r e i m b u r s a b l e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e r a i l s t a t i o n d e v e l o p m e n t f r o m R C T C . "
I n c o n s u l t a t i o n w i t h C o m m i s s i o n e r s w h o h a d p r e v i o u s l y d i s c u s s e d t h e l o a n o f f e r w i t h
T u s t i n , s t a f f i s r e c o m m e n d i n g t h a t n o f u r t h e r a c t i o n b e t a k e n a t t h i s t i m e . S t a f f
c o n t i n u e s t o e x p l o r e o t h e r a v e n u e s f o r t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f T u s t i n - b o u n d c o m m u t e r s t o
t h e i r w o r k s i t e s .
S T A F F R E E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n t a k e n o f u r t h e r a c t i o n a t t h i s t i m e .
: j w
A t t a c h m e n t
"
"
4 . 0 4 4
t r S ; ����
C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t D e p a r t m e n t . . -
M a r c h 2 , 1 9 9 5
i t y o f T u s t i n
M r . J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
R i v e r s i d e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
3 5 6 0 U n i v e r s i t y A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 0 0
R i v e r s i d e , C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 5 0 1
S U B J E C T : C O M M E R C I A L , P A P E R N O T E S P R O G R A M
D e a r M r . R e a g a n :
M r . R o n a l d N a u l t , C i t y o f T u s t i n F i n a n c e D i r e c t o r , h a s
r e v i e w e d t h e C o m m e r c i a l P a p e r N o t e P r o g r a m
o p o s e d b y
t h e R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n ( R C T C ) a s
a l o a n t o f u n d t h e s h o r t f a l l f o r t h e T u s t i n C o m m u t e r R a i l
S t a t i o n . A f t e r e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e r o
g r , t h e T u s t i n d o e s n o t b e l i e v e t h a t t h e C o m m r c i m a l P a p e r o f
T u s t i n
P r o g r a m w o u l d b e i n t h e C i t y ' s b e s t i n t e r e s t a t t h i s
t i m e . H o w e v e r , I d o w a n t t o t h a n k y o u a n d i n d i c a t e o u r
a p p r e c i a t i o n f o r t h e o f f e r .
O n e o f t h e p r o b l e m s w e i d e n t i f i e d w i t h t h e c o m m e r c i a l
p a p e r p r o g r a m i s t h e s h o r t t e r m n a t u r e o f t h e
l o a n t o t h e C i t y . E v e n u t i l i z i n g t h e P r o p o s e d
p r o g r a m
m a x i m u m c a p a b i l i t i e s w i t h a m a t u r i t y o f e i g h t t o t e n
y e a r s , o u r d e b t s e r v i c e o n t h e l o a n w o u l d b e $ 2 5 7 , 0 0 0 -
; : 3 0 6 , 0 0 0 p e r y e a r . A t t h i s t i m e t h e C i t y o f T u s t i n d o e s
n o t h a v e a n i d e n t i f i e d r e v e n u e s t r e a m t o r e p a y t h e l o a n
a t t h i s r a t e . Y o u r b o n d c o u n s e l h a s e x p l a i n e d t h a t t h e
l o a n w o u l d b e s u b j e c t t o t h e i n v e s t m e n t l i m i t a t i o n s o f
t h e g o v e r n m e n t c o d e w i t h a m a x i m u m p e r i o d o f 5 y e a r s f o r
t h e l o a n . T h e C i t y w o u l d n e e d t o s u b m i t r e q u e s t s
a d v a n c e s a g a i n s t t h e l o a n , e a c h a d v a n c e w o u l d t h e n f b e
t r e a t e d a s a n e w 5 - y e a r i n v e s t m e n t .
T h e i n f o r m a t i o n s u b m i t t e d b y t h e R C T C f o r o u r r e v i e w i s
a l s o n o t d e t a i l e d e n o u g h t o d e t e r m i n e t h e m e c h a n i c s o f
h o w T u s t i n w o u l d r e t u r n t h e i n v e s t m e n t t o t h e R C T C o r
u n d e r w h a t c r i t e r i a c o u l d m a t u r i t y b e e x t e n d e d b e y o n d
2 0 0 3 , t h e y e a r t h e C o m m e r c i a l P a p e r P r o g r a m i s d u e t o
e x p i r e .
3 0 0 C e n t e n n i a l W a y
T u s t i n , C A 9 2 6 8 0
D i r e c t o r
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 0 6
P l a n n i n g & Z o n i n g I n f o .
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 4 0
B u i l d i n g
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 3 1
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 3 2
H o u s i n g
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 1 7
C o d e E n f o r c e m e n t
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 3 4
B u s i n e s s L i c e n s e
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 4 4
I n s p e c t i o n R e q u e s t s
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 4 1
G r a f f i t i H o t L i n e
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 1 1
F A X M a c h i n e
( 7 1 4 ) 5 7 3 - 3 1 1 3
Commercial Paper Note Program
March 2, 1995
Page 2
While we appreciate RCTC's offer, we also know that Riverside
residents are anxious to see the Tustin Commuter Rail Station
complete. As an estimated 30% of the anticipated ridership to the
Tustin Station would be Riverside County residents, the residents
will greatly benefit by this station. As another mechanism to
expedite construction of the station we would also be willing to
discuss with the RCTC the possibility of a fair share non -
reimbursable contribution to the rail station development from
RCTC.
I would look forward to further discussion with you on expediting
implementation of the Tustin Commuter Rail Station. Tustin City
staff is available to meet at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Christine A. Shfigleton
Assistant City Manager
cc: William Huston
Tim Serlet
Ron Nault
Rita Westfield
Dave Elbaum, OCTA
CAS:RW:br:peper.ltr
•
•
April 5, 1995
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
TO:
FROM: Bill Hughes, Bechtel Deputy Project Manager
Tom Horkan, Bechtel Project Manager
Budget and Finance Committee
THROUGH: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT: Amendment 2 to Miralles Contract RO-9430 to provide planning and
preliminary engineering for Riverside -Downtown Commuter Rail Station
second passenger platform, pedestrian access between platforms,
pedestrian access from surface streets, Metrolink train storage facility
and possible future connections to San Jacinto Line service.
At the July 13, 1994 Commission meeting, RCTC approved contract RO-9430 with
Miralles Associates, Inc. to prepare a site feasibility study for a rail station at RCTC
owned property at Highgrove. The study has been delayed as RCTC and Santa Fe
discuss options of moving the proposed layover facility at Highgrove.
At the March 8, 1995 Commission meeting, RCTC approved contract amendment No.
1 with Miralles for design of a parking lot expansion of the Riverside -Downtown lot.
That work is currently underway and will be substantially completed by late April.
Staff is bringing forward proposed Amendment No. 2 per Commission action in
March, to begin planning and preliminary engineering for an additional passenger
platform at the Riverside -Downtown station, accommodation of pedestrian access
between the platforms and from surface streets, and potential connections to San
Jacinto line service at some future date through the proposed Metrolink storage
facility between 3rd and 7th Streets next to the Riverside Water Canal and Santa Fe
tracks.
The proposed scope of work, and fee estimate are attached for Commission review.
The estimated cost of this work is $55,000 with additional extra work for this study
of $8,250. Miralles currently has the following estimated fee for all three pieces of
work:
Original Agreement
Amendment No. 1
Proposed Amendment No. 2
Total Proposed Contract
F:\USERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\MAI-A2.WH
- $28,216 (Highgrove station study)
- $35,560 (parking lot expansion)
- $55,000 (second platform, etc.)
- $118,776
Page 2
Original extra work
Additional extra work
Total extra work
- $ 4,234
- $ 8,250
- $ 12,484
Once planning activity and preliminary engineering are complete, a scope of work for
project design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the platform
work and other pedestrian facilities will be brought forward to the Commission.
Amendment Number 2 work is estimated to cost $55,000. (Funds for the work will
be 100% reimbursed by State Transit Capital Improvements (TCI) funds. Previous
land acquisition costs will be used as the 50% match requirement of the TCI grant.)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve the attached Amendment 2 to Agreement RO-9345
with Miracles Associates to provide planning and preliminary engineering services for
Riverside -Downtown Commuter Rail Station second passenger platform, pedestrian
access between platforms, pedestrian access from surface streets, Metrolink train
storage facility and possible future connections to San Jacinto Line service for an
amount of $55,000 with an additional extra work amount of $8,250.
:jw
Attachment
F:\US ERS\PREPRINT\APR.95\MAI-A2. WH
Mr. William R. Hughes, P.E.
BechteVSouthem California
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, California 92501
Re:
Schedule A - Description
Riverside Downtown Area Rail PIa
Contract Unit Description
9
Date: March 23, 1995
Contract Scope: The Contract consists primarily of the planning of rail
improvements in the downtown Riverside area. The planning will identify landuse
alternatives based upon the connection and Integration of rail activities with other uses
within the nearby area including traffic and pedestrian circulation. The completed
study will provide a method of phasing and the a cost estimate of the improvements
over a 15 year time frame.
Overall Rail Activity: Currently the tracks in the downtown Riverside area are used
by the Metrolink, Union Pacific, Santa Fe, and Amtrak trains. As part of the study the
existing and anticipated uses will be documented. An expanded Metrolink service will
be planned for by the use of up to 36 trains per day on the existing San Bemardino,
San Jacinto, Irvine and Los Angeles lines. Amtrak service Is also planned.
North & South Platform Area: This area consists of the existing North Platform,
the proposed South Platform and the surrounding parking and nearby buildings. The
constraints and opportunities of this area will be fully addressed. Specific issues to be
considered will include the following:
New South Platform - A new south platform will be studied. This platform will
service Metrolink trains from the San Jacinto and Irvine lines. In addition the
possibility of lengthening the platform to provide limited Amtrak service is a
stated need. Spatial requirements for both the Metrolink and Amtrak and San
Jacinto motor train platforms and trains will be documented. The new platform
will be built over the existing irrigation canal.
Royal Citrus/Existing FMC building - The new south platform will require a new
track right-of-way. Since the Existing FMC building is in the proposed right-of-
way. The removal of an existing small office building and the first north side bay
of the warehouse will be based on the structural studies by Johnson and
Nielsen. This work will be reviewed and a cost estimate provided.
Rilif Associated Development - Land parcels next to North & South Platforms
will be studied and the best landuse and phasing strategies will be
recommended. In addition, the cost and feasibility of providing either
pedestrian access over the tracks or under the existing 14th stre = bri
north and south platforms will be analyzed. The areas studied
following areas will be studied:
A. Temporary Parking Area • In the future
permanent parking or sold or leased
possible use being considered is a hea
be documented.
ed for
op = t. One
r potential uses will
B. Existing North Platform Area -The existing Metrolink parking area may
be used for surface parking,however a parking structure and/or a
combination retail and parking structure will be considered.
C. New South Platform Area - The possibility of providing parking
adjacent to the new south platform will be investigated.
D. Existing Platform Extension - A new use of the land to the east of the
existing platform will be studied..Currently Construction Documents are
being prepared by Metrolink to use this area for overnight train storage.
Southside Overnight Metrolink Train Storage - The area between the
Royal Citrus property and the Union Pacific Right -of -Way is being considered as
an altemate area for overnight train storage. This use will be investigated. In
addition, the feasibility of providing a limited amount of train maintenance and
servicing at this location will be researched as an alternative to sending the
trains to Los Angeles.
Old Train Depot Area -The old train depot area will be studied for potential
uses, as well as methods of integrating and connecting the Old Train Depot
Area with Downtown Riverside, the Metrolink platform, and the retail area.
Highgrove Platform - The Highgrove area was recently considered for
ovemight storage of trains and for a community platform. Altemate uses for the
la* will be discussed.
•
AUI ALLIS ASSOCIATES. INC.
•
•
Mr. William R. Hughes, P.E.
Bechtel/Southem California
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, California 92501
Re: Schedule C - Cost Proposal
Riverside Downtown Area Rail Planning
Contract Planning Cost
Date: March 27, 1995
DRAFT
Contract Planning Cost: The Contract Planning Cost is based upon the Contract
Unit Description provided In a Draft letter to William R. Hughes, P.E. on March 23,
1995. Wailes Associates will provide three Ralf Improvement Land Use Alternatives
and prepare a preliminary Concept Plan. Limited advisory assistance for Engineering,
Historical, Landscape, Cost and Economic concerns will be incorporated. This work
will form the basis for more detailed investigation if required. We anticipate a project
schedule of approximately four months. Reimbursable Expenses, such as report
reproduction, surveys, mileage, and telephone are not included. The following is a
proposed fee breakdown per task:
Research and Review of Existing Documents $ 8,000
Site Investigations and Analysis $ 10,000
Develop 3 Conceptual Land Use Alternatives $ 20,000
Including Traffic and Pedestrian Circulation
r Develop Preferred Preliminary Concept Plan $ 12,000
with Estimated Costs
• Prepare Preliminary Concept Plan Report $ 5,000
and Drawings
Total $ 55,000
Consultants:
Miralles Associates, inc.: Planners
Wilbur Smith: Rail Engineering Planner
CH2M-Hill: Engineering
Carl H. Schiermeyer: Amtrak & Rail Planning
Johnson & Nielsen: Structural Engineers
Edcon, Warren Cooley: Economic Planning
729 Rent Woodbury Road • Altadeaa, California 91991 • Telephone 1111111 791-71191
"
"
"
I n t e r f a c e s :
R e l a t e d a r e a d e v e l o p m e n t
A m t r a k , f r e i g h t a n d b u s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n
U t i l i t i e s
C o n s u l t a n t s : M i r a l i e s A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . ; A r c h l t = m o p i n g ,
C H 2 M " H i l i ; E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n
W i l b u r S m i t h : R a i l E n g i n e e r i n g
E a r t h M e c h a n i c s , I n c . ; S o i l s , E n v i T , ; t a l A s s e s s m e n t
C a r l H . S c h i e r m e y e r ; A m t r a k & R a i l = n n i n g .
J o h n s o n & N i e l s e n ; F M C b u i l d i n g s t r u c t u r a l m o d i f i c a t i o n
AGENDA_ ITEM #8D
"
"
"
R I V E R S I D E C O U N T Y T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N
D A T E : A p r i l 5 , 1 9 9 5
T O : B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e
F R O M : S u s a n C o r n e l i s o n , S e n i o r S t a f f A n a l y s t
T H R O U G H : J a c k R e a g a n , E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r
S U B J E C T : O r a n g e B l o s s o m F e s t i v a l A g r e e m e n t s
T h e O r a n g e B l o s s o m F e s t i v a l w i l l b e h e l d o n A p r i l 2 2 a n d 2 3 , 1 9 9 5 , i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f
t h e D o w n t o w n R i v e r s i d e M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n . T u r n - o f - t h e c e n t u r y d i s p l a y s a r e s c h e d u l e d
t o i n c l u d e h i s t o r i c r a i l c a r s a n d l o c o m o t i v e s f r o m t h e S a n t a F e r a i l w a y , O r a n g e E m p i r e
R a i l r o a d M u s e u m a n d t h e S a n B e r n a r d i n o R a i l r o a d H i s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y . P u b l i c a c c e s s
t o t h e s e d i s p l a y s w i l l b e a t t h e M e t r o l i n k s t a t i o n , u t i l i z i n g s t a t i o n t r a c k s a n d p l a t f o r m .
I n a d d i t i o n , c h a r t e r e d M e t r o l i n k t r a i n s a r e s c h e d u l e d t o b r i n g v i s i t o r s t o R i v e r s i d e o n
b o t h d a t e s f r o m B u r b a n k , L o s A n g e l e s , I n d u s t r y , O n t a r i o , I r v i n e , S a n t a A n a a n d
O r a n g e , u t i l i z i n g b o t h t h e U n i o n P a c i f i c a n d S a n t a F e r a i l c o r r i d o r s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n
p r e v i o u s l y a c t e d t o g u a r a n t e e M e t r o l i n k t h o s e c h a r t e r c o s t s w h i c h m a y e x c e e d t i c k e t
r e v e n u e s , u p t o a m a x i m u m o f $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 .
I n o r d e r t o i n d e m n i f y t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d S C R R A f r o m l i a b i l i t y i n t h e u s e o f t h e i r
p r o p e r t i e s , l e g a l c o u n s e l i s d r a f t i n g a g r e e m e n t s w i t h O r a n g e E m p i r e R a i l M u s e u m a n d
S a n B e r n a r d i n o R a i l r o a d H i s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y . B o t h o f t h e s e e n t i t i e s h a v e a l s o a g r e e d t o
p r o v i d e t h e C o m m i s s i o n w i t h c e r t i f i c a t e s o f i n s u r a n c e .
T h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a R e g i o n a l R a i l A u t h o r i t y i s f i n a l i z i n g i t s c o s t e s t i m a t e s f o r t h e
c h a r t e r t r a i n s a n d w i l l b e s u b m i t t i n g a c o n t r a c t f o r e x e c u t i o n b y R C T C . A d r a f t
c o n t r a c t w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d a t t h e B u d g e t a n d F i n a n c e C o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g .
S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N :
T h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i z e t h e E x e c u t i v e D i r e c t o r o r h i s d e s i g n e e t o :
1 ) E x e c u t e t h e a p p r o p r i a t e i n d e m n i f i c a t i o n a g r e e m e n t s w i t h O r a n g e E m p i r e R a i l
M u s e u m a n d S a n B e r n a r d i n o R a i l r o a d H i s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y ; a n d ,
2 ) S u b j e c t t o l e g a l c o u n s e l r e v i e w , e x e c u t e a c o n t r a c t w i t h t h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a
R e g i o n a l R a i l A u t h o r i t y f o r t h e c h a r t e r o f M e t r o l i n k t r a i n s o n A p r i l 2 2 a n d 2 3 ,
1 9 9 5 , i n a n a m o u n t n o t t o e x c e e d $ 2 8 , 0 0 0 .
: j w
A t t a c h m e n t
P♦ • 1
ON �
GE ROOMER
TAKE METROLINK TO THE
1995 SUNKIST ORANGE BLOSSOM FESTIVAL
IN RIVERSIDE ON APRIL 22 AND 23!
Stinkist
Leave your car at home and enjoy: -
TURN OF THE CENTURY PARADE
CIRCUS • ORANGE -FLAVORED FOOD
WILD WEST SHOW • LIVE ENTERTAINMENT
CARRIAGE TOURS • ANTIQUE TRAINS
HISTORICAL TRUCK AND TRACTOR SHOW
"FIREWORKS • MAGIC SHOW • CARNIVAL
AND MUCH, MUCH MORE
r
9
Travel back to a simpler time, as the
Sunkist Orange Blossom Festival
transforms Riverside into a
Tum-of-the Century experience.
For more Festival information,
including event times, nearby hotels
and special senior attractions, call
1-800-382-8202.
RIDE METROUNK DIRECT TO THE HEART OF THE FESTIVAL FROM L.A. COUNTY
WITH STOPS IN BURBANK, GLENDALE, L.A. UNION STATION, CITY OF INDUSTRY AND EAST ONTARIO.
FROM ORANGE COUNTY WITH STOPS IN IRVINE, SANTA ANA AND ORANGE.
�AllFestival attractions within walldng distance ofMetrolink Station or use our free trolley servicec :11
YES, I WANT TO TAKE THE TRAIN TO THE SUNKIST ORANGE BLO
SSOM FESTIVAL.
Round -Trip Adult Fare @ $10 ea. Qty.
Round -Trip Senior/Child Fare* @ $7 ea. Qty.
4 -Person All -Age Pack @ $30 Qty.
10 -Person All -Age Pack ® $?0 Qty.
*Seniors 62 years and older
Children 2 to 15 years of age
❑ Credit Card # (Visa/Mastercard) Exp. Date
0 Check Make check payable to: Sunkist Orange Blossom Festival
Name
111 Address
1ILL Telephone Number (
L
Total DATE ATTENDING: TIME:
Total ❑ Saturday, April 22 ❑ Early a.m.
Total 0 Sunday, April 23 ❑ Late a.m.
Total
MAIL PAYMENT TO:
Total Amount Sunkist Orange Blossom Festival
Metrolink Special
P.O. Box 1603
Riverside, CA 92502.1603
City State Zip
ORANGE BLOSSOM 11
official Sponsors'* Sunkist orange Blossom Festival
Sunkist Growers, Inc.
The Mission Inn
City of Riverside
The Press -Enterprise
KCAL 96.7/KOLA 99.9
KCAL -AM "La Mexicana"
Riverside Public Utilities
Castle Amusement Park
Pacificare of California
Riverside County Office
of Education
Metrolink
Galleria at Tyler
Fruit Growers Supply Co.
Holiday Inn of Riverside
Riverside Visitor &
Convention Center
Best, Best & Krieger
First Interstate Bank
Tilden -Coil Constructors, Inc.
FMC
PNC Mortgage
Courtyard by Marriott
Lehigh Construction
LOS ANCELES TO RIVERSIDE
Station
Burbank
Glendale
Lae Angeles
Industry
East Ontario
PAY
Riverside
Station
Riverside
Pedey
East Ontario
Industry
Los Angeles
Glendale
Burbank
Station
Irvine
Santa Ma
Orange
Riverside
Station
Riverside
Orange
Santa Ma
Irvine
Burbank
Saturday Sunday `
Departure Times Departure Times
7:50 11:55 9:45
786 12:01 9:51
820 12:25 10:15
8:54 12:59 10:49
0
9:14 1:10 11:09
923 1:19 11:18
9:37 123 11:32
RIVERSIDE TO LOS ANCELES
Saturday Sunday
Departure Tomes Departure Times
4:00 8:00 530
4:10 8:10 5:40
4:18 8:18 5:48 •.
4:37 8:37 607
525 9:30 7:00
5:36 9:41 7:11
5:45 9:50 7:17
IRVINE TO RIVERSIDE
Sammy
Departure Times Departure Times
7:45 11:00
7:56 11:12
8:00 11:18
9:15 12:30
Sunday
9:50
10:02
10:07
11:13
RIVERSIDE TO IRVINE
Saturday
Departure Tunes Departure Times
420 7:55
5:35 9:00
5:40 9:04
5:52 9:15
Sunday
5:35
6:40
6:44
8:58
201 N. Front Street
East Ontario 3330 Best Francis Street
Glendale 400 W. Cerritos Ave
'y 600 S. Brea Canyon RA
r'vhle 15215 Barranca Parkway
L.A. Union Catkin 800 N. Alameda Street
Orange 194 N. Atchison Street
The Pedley Statbn 6001 Pedley Road
IWierehk) Downtown 4056 Vine Street__
Salta Ana 1000 a. Santa Ana
s