HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 24, 2014 Budget & Implementationcxi
RECORDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
MEETING AGENDA
TIME: 9:30 a.m.
DATE: Monday, March 24, 2014
LOCATION:
BOARD ROOM
County of Riverside Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside
- COMMITTEE MEMBERS ?
Douglas Hanson, Chair / Patrick Mullany, City of Indian Wells
Roger Berg, Vice Chair / David Castaldo, City of Beaumont
Ella Zanowic / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa
Mary Craton / Randy Bonner, City of Canyon Lake
Greg Pettis / Kathleen DeRosa, City of Cathedral City
Steven Hernandez / Eduardo Garcia, City of Coachella
Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs
Larry Smith / Robert Youssef, City of Hemet
Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore
Rick Gibbs / Kelly Bennett, City of Murrieta
Steve Adams / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside
Ron Roberts / Jeff Comerchero, City of Temecula
John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District II
Jeff Stone, County of Riverside, District I I I
`Pe STAFF ?
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer
'° AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY svmA
Annual Budget Development and Oversight
Competitive Federal and State Grant Programs
Countywide Communications and Outreach Programs
Countywide Strategic Plan
Legislation
Public Communications and Outreach Programs
Short Range Transit Plans
Comments are welcomed by the Committee. If you wish to provide comments to the Committee, please
complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
www.rctc.orq
AGENDA *
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda
9:30 a.m.
Monday, March 24, 2014
BOARD ROOM
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street, First Floor
Riverside, California
In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed
72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be
available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080
Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.orq.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need
special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Clerk of the Board at
(951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that
reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous
minutes or less. The Committee may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority
vote of the Committee, waive this three minute time limitation. Depending on the number
of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion,
reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. Also, the Committee may
terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. In addition, the
maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes.
Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written
documents to be distributed or presented to the Committee shall be submitted to the Clerk
of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items.
Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters raised during
public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on the agenda. Board members
may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent
agenda for consideration.
Budget and Implementation Committee
March 24, 2014
Page 2
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — FEBRUARY 24, 2014
6.
7.
ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after making a
finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came
to the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action
adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee. If there are less than
2/3 of the Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a
unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.)
REVISED PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 BUDGET
Page 1
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the FY 2014/15
Budget; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
•
8. SUPPORT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE APPLICATION FOR •
DESIGNATION AS A MANUFACTURING COMMUNITY AS PART OF THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE INVESTING IN MANUFACTURING COMMUNITIES
PARTNERSHIP
Page 9
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Authorize the Executive Director to provide a letter of support for the University of
California (UC) Riverside's application for designation as a manufacturing
community (Manufacturing Community) as part of the U.S. Department of
Commerce Investing in Manufacturing Communities Partnership (ICMP);
2) Adopt Resolution No. 14-014, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Certifying Support for the University of California Riverside's Application
for Designation as a Manufacturing Community as Part of the U.S. Department of
Commerce Investing and Manufacturing Communities Partnership";
3) Work in cooperation with UC Riverside and the San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG) in providing information and support for the application;
and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
Budget and Implementation Committee
March 24, 2014
Page 3
9. STATE LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Overview
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Adopt the following state bill positions:
a) AB 515 (Dickinson) — Seek Amendments;
b) AB 2197 (Mullin) —Support;
c) SB 785 (Wolk) — Support if Amended;
d) SB 969 (DeSaulnier) — Oppose Unless Amended; and
e) SB 990 (Vidak) — Oppose.
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
10. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT
Overview
Page 13
This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended
and upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities.
11. ADJOURNMENT AND THE NEXT MEETING
The next Budget and Implementation Committee meeting is scheduled to be held at
9:30 a.m., Monday, April 28, 2014, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative
Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside.
DETACH AND SUBMIT TO THE CLERK OF THE BOARD
D ATE: 5 i LW//(
CHECK IF SUBJECT OF
PUBLIC COMMENTS: PUBLIC COMMEN TS:
AGENDA ITEM NO. : L^j SUBJECT OF
(AS LISTED ON THE AGENDA) 11 AGEND A ITEM:
n 1)1 (9t/ e
NAME:
PHONE NO.:
AD DRESS:
STREET
CITY ZIP C ODE
REPRESENTIN G: S C / ► G PHONE NO.:
N AME OF AG EN CY / ORGANIZATION / GROUP
BUSINESS ADD RESS:
STREET
CITY ZIP CO DE
AGENDA ITEM 5
MINUTES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
Monday, February 24, 2014
MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Budget and Implementation Committee was called to order by
Chair Ella Zanowic at 9:32 a.m., in the Board Room at the County of Riverside
Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At this time, Commissioner John Tavaglione led the Budget and Implementation
Committee in a flag salute.
3. ROLL CALL
Members/Alternates Present Members Absent
Roger Berg
Mary Craton
Rick Gibbs
Douglas Hanson
Bob Magee
Scott Matas
Greg Pettis
Ron Roberts
Larry Smith
John Tavaglione
Ella Zanowic
Steve Adams
Steven Hernandez
Jeff Stone
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no requests to speak from the public.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — NOVEMBER 25, 2013
M/S/C (Tavaglione/Hanson) to approve the minutes of November 25, 2013
meeting as submitted.
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
February 24, 2014
Page 2
6. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS
There were no additions or revisions to the agenda.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single
motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items
pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
M/S/C (Craton/Smith) to approve the following Consent Calendar item(s):
7A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1) Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the six months
ended December 31, 2013; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7B. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS
1) Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 3 2013 (Q3 2013); and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7C. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
1) Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended
December 31, 2013; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
7D. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT
1) Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the second
quarter ended December 31, 2013; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
8. AGREEMENT WITH CTG INC. OF ILLINOIS DBA NOVANIS FOR INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES
Jennifer Harmon, Office and Board Services Manager, provided an overview of the
scope of services for the agreement with CTG Inc. of Illinois DBA Novanis for information
technology (IT) support services.
In response to Commissioner Douglas Hanson's request for clarification about the cost
and term of the agreement, Jennifer Harmon replied the recommended award amount
covers five years.
•
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
February 24, 2014
Page 3
In response to Commissioner Larry Smith's question about how the cost related to the
previous IT costs, Jennifer Harmon replied the scope of work is completely different as
previous IT support was very basic and did not provide for services such as planning,
monitoring, or a business continuity plan. She stated the previous IT services were
covered under purchase orders at approximately $25,000 per year.
M/S/C (Craton/Hanson) to:
1) Award Agreement No. 14-12-062-00 with CTG Inc. of Illinois dba
Novanis (Novanis) for information technology (IT) support services for a
three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in
an amount not to exceed $680,000;
2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel
review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
9. PROPOSED POLICY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 BUDGET
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, presented the budget policy goals and
objectives for FY 2014/15, highlighting the following areas:
• Commission policy goals — Mobility, goods movement, economic development,
system efficiencies, environmental stewardship, intermodalism and accessibility,
and communications;
• Financial and administrative policies; and
• Next steps.
Commissioner Hanson referred to rail transit through the San Gorgonio Pass to the
Coachella Valley and asked where this service is located in the report.
Theresia Trevino replied this service is located under the "Support Transportation
Choices Through Intermodalism and Accessibility" section, fourth bullet.
Commissioner Hanson stated when this matter was being discussed, Coachella Valley's
concern was how the Commission could heighten the awareness of this service when
developing the Commission's goals and objectives. He stated it is important to bring
this service to the forefront more than as it exists now.
Anne Mayer suggested placing it under the "Promote Mobility" section.
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
February 24, 2014
Page 4
Theresia Trevino replied staff will move it under the "Promote Mobility" section and
look at areas in the text of the budget document where there could be an expanded
discussion. She noted there is discussion of the service in the rail department budget
narrative.
Commissioner Hanson concurred and requested anything staff can provide to make this
service more prominent and increase awareness.
M/S/C (Hanson/Craton) to:
1) Approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the
FY 2014/15 Budget;
2) Include the rail transit through San Gorgonio Pass Area under the
Promote Mobility and Other Objectives; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
10. CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION REGARDING MEASURE A
REVENUE ALLOCATION IN CONNECTION WITH CITY FINANCING
Theresia Trevino presented the city of Jurupa Valley's request for confirmation
regarding Measure A revenue allocation in connection with the city financing.
Commissioner Rick Gibbs stated Commission action will depend upon the advice of legal
counsel and based on the liability the Commission may incur. He recommended to
receive and file.
At Commissioner Tavaglione's request, Theresia Trevino clarified it is staff's intent to
return a recommendation to the Commission at its March or April meeting after vetting
through legal counsel.
Commissioner Tavaglione stated cities are making progress with the state legislature.
He shared his discussions with Senator Richard Roth and stated an announcement
should be released in the near future regarding the legislation. It seems very positive
and should provide a long-term fix, subject to the Governor's approval.
Anne Mayer replied staff typically does not bring forward staff reports to the
Commission to receive and file while in the process of working with legal counsel to
determine the proper course of action. She stated this matter was brought forward at
this time because the city of Jurupa Valley sent a letter requesting staff provide this
verification. The city of Jurupa Valley is waiting on the Commission to proceed with its
financing. It is very unique and unusual. Staff's impression is the city of Jurupa Valley
does not want to wait for the statewide resolution and wants to proceed now. She
stated the goal is to try and meet the city of Jurupa Valley's needs as quickly as possible.
1
•
•
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
February 24, 2014
Page 5
M/S/C (Craton/Tavaglione) to:
1) Receive and file a request from the city of Jurupa Valley (City) for
confirmation by the Commission that, in the case of disincorporation,
the 2009 Measure A Western County Local Streets and Roads (LSR)
allocations annually allocated to the City would be periodically
transferred to the county of Riverside (County) to be available to pay
debt service on the City's contemplated financing for street
improvements;
2) Direct staff to continue to engage legal counsel in the development of a
resolution to be adopted by the Commission and in the provision of a
legal opinion to the Commission; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
11. RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2015 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FINANCIAL RESOLUTION
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager, provided an overview of the
Riverside County 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program financial
resolution.
M/S/C (Gibbs/Hanson) to:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 14-013, "Resolution of the Riverside County
Transportation Commission Certifying That Riverside County Has
Resources to Fund Projects in Federal Fiscal Years 2014/15 Through
2019/20 Transportation Improvement Program and Affirming
Commitment to Implement All Projects in the Program";
2) Forward to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
for inclusion in the 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program
(FTIP); and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
12. 2009 MEASURE A MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT BASE YEAR ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF
WILDOMAR
Grace Alvarez provided an overview of the 2009 Measure A Maintenance of Effort base
year adjustment for the city of Wildomar.
M/S/C (Smith/Tavaglione) to:
1) Approve the adjustment to the city of Wildomar's (Wildomar) 2009
Measure A Maintenance of Effort (MOE) base year; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
February 24, 2014
Page 6
13. SB 821 PROGRAM REVISIONS
Jillian Guizado, Staff Analyst, presented the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Program revisions.
M/S/C (Berg/Gibbs) to:
1) Approve the allocation of $285,897 to the city of Temecula (Temecula)
to fully fund the Pauba Road Sidewalk Improvement project and apply
$2,114 to the next SB 821 Call for Projects (SB 821 Call);
2) Approve the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) SB 821
subcommittee's (subcommittee) recommendation to maintain a
competitive Call is to extend the SB 821 Call from its current annual
basis to a biennial basis, and set the SB 821 Call release date for the first
Monday of every other February and the SB 821 Call close date for the
last Thursday of every other April, beginning February 2015; and
3) Forward to the Commission for final action.
14. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager, presented an update on state and federal
legislative activities.
Anne Mayer added the two reports issued by the California State Transportation Agency
are being evaluated. The Self -Help County Coalition is putting together a response to
those reports. She expects over the next month as details are identified, staff will
convene the Quality of Life and Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee to begin discussions of
these reports in order to receive policy guidance.
Commissioner Smith referred to H.R. 29 (Gomez) and asked about its impact to the
Commission since it is a restriction of outsourcing of services and assets to be imposed
on local governments. He requested Aaron Hake track H.R. 29 and provide an update if
there are any impacts that could affect the Commission and the cities.
Aaron Hake concurred.
M/S/C to:
1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
RCTC Budget and Implementation Committee Minutes
February 24, 2014
Page 7
40 15. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Jennifer Harmon stated this item is for the Budget and Implementation Committee to
conduct an election of the officers for 2014.
1
•
At this time, Chair Zanowic opened nominations for the Chair position.
Chair Zanowic, seconded by Commissioner Scott Matas, nominated Commissioner
Douglas Hanson for the Chair position for 2014.
No other nominations were received. The Chair closed the nominations.
Chair Zanowic opened nominations for the Vice Chair position for 2014.
Chair Zanowic, seconded by Commissioner John Tavaglione, nominated Commissioner
Roger Berg for the Vice Chair position for 2014.
No other nominations were received. The Chair closed the nominations.
Commissioners Douglas Hanson and Roger Berg were elected as the Budget and
Implementation Committee's Chair and Vice Chair for 2014, respectively.
16. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
16A. Commissioner Pettis announced SCAG opened the public comment period for its
draft 2014 Public Participation Plan. It is posted on SCAG's website and will be
receiving comment until March 7. SCAG is also laying the groundwork and
developing the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy.
17. ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING
There being no further business for consideration by the Budget and Implementation
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:26 a.m. The next meeting of the Budget
and Implementation Committee is scheduled for March 24, 2014, at 9:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer Harmon
Clerk of the Board
AGENDA ITEM 7
•
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 24, 2014
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer
THROUGH:
John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Revised Proposed Policy Goals and Objectives for Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Approve the proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the FY 2014/15
Budget; and
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The initial step in the budget process is to develop policy goals and objectives for the next fiscal
year that are consistent with the Commission's overall strategic direction. Most importantly,
the adoption of the Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the annual fiscal year budget
provides an opportunity to match the Commission's spending priorities in a manner that
implements the promises made to the citizens of the county of Riverside in both Measure A
Expenditure Plans and fulfills other Commission responsibilities.
At its March 12 meeting, the Commission recommended approval of the policy goals and
objectives for the FY 2014/15 Budget and requested consideration for some additional policy
goals and objectives. Staff revised the Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for the
FY 2014/15 Budget to include the additional items, which are highlighted below:
• Promote Mobility: An objective related to CEQA/NEPA reform was added as well as an
objective related to future rail expansion opportunities the Western Riverside County.
• Encourage Economic Development: The last objective regarding support for local
projects was revised to include those that are consistent with Commission commitments
such as the Cajalco Road corridor.
• Financial and Administration Policies: A new section related to Procurement Policies
was added; this section includes the objective for enhanced outreach to Riverside
County businesses and contractors.
Staff recommends the Commission approves the revised Policy Goals and Objectives for the
FY 2014/15 Budget.
Attachment: Revised Proposed Commission Policy Goals and Objectives for FY 2014/15 Budget
Agenda Item 7
1
Commission Policy Goals and Objectives
•
•
•
In addition to financial and administration policies, the Commission has seven long-term policy goals: promote
mobility, mitigate and address the impact of goods movement, encourage economic development, ensure
improved system efficiencies, foster environmental stewardship, support transportation choices through
intermodalism and accessibility, and prioritize public and agency communications. For each of these policy goals,
the objectives and initiatives that were considered in the framework of the work plan for the FY 2014/15 budget
are identified below.
While Riverside County shows signs of economic recovery, the Commission remains cautious about revenue
availability. The need for better transportation remains a top public priority, and the Commission is poised to
address this challenge via the seven policy goals. In moving forward with an aggressive program of projects and
services, the Commission may face fluctuating Measure A, TUMF, and TDA revenues and uncertainty regarding the
availability of federal and state transportation revenues. Due to the long-term nature of many of the Commission's
programs, many of the policy goals' objectives and initiatives are ongoing from year to year.
Promote Mobility
The Commission, in cooperation with local, state, and federal agencies, will strive to create a transportation system
that promotes efficient mobility both within the County and region.
• Continue to aggressively pursue completion of the environmental, design, and construction processes on
key components of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan, which includes the SR -91, 1-15, and 1-215
corridor improvement projects and the SR -60 truck climbing lane project.
• Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice by:
o Continuing property acquisition and construction on the SR -91 corridor improvement project
through Corona, which includes the extension of tolled express lanes (91 Express Lanes) into
Riverside County; and
o Continuing to develop a tolled express lane system on 1-15 between SR -60 and Cajalco Road.
• Provide leadership in the planning and development of the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor
rail service.
• Work closely with partners in the Coachella Valley, including CVAG and SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine)
to ensure the implementation of Measure A funding priorities.
• Complete projects and programs included in the 1989 Measure A ordinance and determine use(s) for
any unexpended revenues.
• Continue the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the Mid County Parkway and SR -
79 realignment projects.
• Continue to work with state and federal agencies to fund and construct projects programmed in the
STIP, Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), Proposition 1B bond programs, Active
Transportation Program, and Measure A program as well as other high priority regional projects.
• Maximize obtaining all available transportation funds and strategically program funds to meet funding
deadlines and to prevent the lapse and loss of funds.
• Leverage the effective application and use of Measure A Western County regional arterial and other
state and federal funds to deliver eligible regional arterial projects.
• Work closely with local jurisdictions to administer the TUMF Regional Arterial Program and facilitate the
delivery of eligible arterial improvements in Western County.
• Actively participate in the SR -91 Advisory Committee to facilitate near and long-term improvements to
SR -91, enhance intercounty public transit options, and foster mobility improvements between the two
counties.
• Advocate streamlining efforts at the state and federal levels that will reduce costs, time, and delays
currently associated with project delivery including, but not limited to, timely project reviews and
approvals.
• Continue active engagement in state and federal efforts to streamline and reform CEQA and NEPA to
improve the ability to deliver critical projects that enhance mobility within the County and the region.
2
• Continue to coordinate and provide public access to commuter information via the 1E511 system and
focus commuter assistance and 1E511 outreach efforts under one brand.
• Continue cooperation with the FTA regarding the Small Starts process to support the continuation of
construction and initiation of the Perris Valley Line commuter rail service in 2015.
• Continue to work with the public transit operators to control costs and increase system efficiencies in
order to accommodate and adjust to fluctuating revenues from local, state and federal sources.
• Continue to develop transit service to further promote seamless intracity, intercity, and regional transit
connectivity for County residents.
• Commence consideration of future rail expansion opportunities including the potential for extension of
the Perris Valley Line to the Hemet/San Jacinto and Temecula areas.
Mitigate and Address the Impact of Goods Movement
The Commission will work with federal, state, and local governments to facilitate the movement of goods and
services to, within, and through the County, recognizing the vital role goods movement mobility plays in the
economic health of the County, the State, and the nation.
• Seek funding and local agency concurrence to implement the Commission's approved, high -priority
railroad grade separation list to mitigate the impact of increased goods movement demands on the
transportation system.
• Encourage Congress to create a federal freight trust fund, or similar program with a dedicated and
firewalled revenue structure, in order to treat the nation's multimodal national goods movement network
as a system rather than individual projects.
• Remain committed to a regional approach regarding goods movement issues in order to maximize
funding from state and federal sources to goods movement needs in Southern California.
• Continue working with the Ports and regional transportation commissions to develop a funding
mechanism for needed projects and mitigation on a regional basis.
• Provide input to the National Freight Advisory Committee regarding the establishment of a national
freight network and California State Freight Advisory Committee regarding regional freight priorities.
Encourage Economic Development
Transportation decisions will consider the economic benefits derived from any improvement, and, where feasible
and practical, will pursue transportation alternatives that enhance or complement economic development.
• Commit to seek opportunities related to transportation projects that will create jobs and improve the
economic base in the County.
• Support local agencies in the design and construction of interchanges that are in proximity to regional
economic centers and developments.
• Support local projects, consistent with countywide transportation goals and Commission commitments,
which enhance business development, local employment, and area tourism.
Ensure Improved System Efficiencies
The Commission will select projects and allocate funds in a manner that will improve safety and reduce congested
traffic corridors.
• Advocate the development and use of advanced technologies for transportation applications that are
affordable and practical.
• In partnership with SANBAG, implement enhancements to the 1E511 mobile application for improved
deployment of real-time traffic information, real-time bus and rail transit trip planning information, and
rideshare information available to commuters for the purpose of trip planning and reducing congestion.
• Assure the effectiveness of transit planning through coordination with the County's eight transit
operators, Citizens' Advisory Committee, and annual SRTP process with a goal toward promoting
program productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness.
3
• Provide innovative commuter rideshare programs to reduce single occupant vehicle trips and coordinate
with other regional rideshare service providers to address intercounty commute trips.
• Work with local jurisdictions, Caltrans, and the CHP to continue efficient delivery of a comprehensive
motorist aid system which includes an 1E511 traveler information service, a call box program, and a FSP
program, including temporary services in freeway construction zones.
• Leverage resources to incorporate park and ride facilities and additional connecting bus service at
Metrolink stations that may have available capacity.
• Continue working with Caltrans to monitor traffic conditions for the purpose of focusing transportation
funds on congested corridors and system deficiencies.
• Work with Caltrans and regional agencies in developing resources for preservation and maintenance of
the highways and regional arterials.
• Support the implementation of active transportation facilities that support transportation alternatives.
Foster Environmental Stewardship
The Commission will achieve its mobility goals while promoting environmental stewardship and protecting the
area's natural resources and quality of life.
• Continue working with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), Caltrans,
and state/federal resource agencies to implement the MSHCP.
• Work with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), sub -regional agencies, and local jurisdictions to implement the current
RTP and sustainable communities' strategy that meets regional air quality goals, conformity guidelines,
and SB 375 green house reduction targets for the SCAG region.
• Support a variety of outreach channels and educational programs that promote the benefits of
ridesharing, public and specialized transit, rail, and availability of commuter resources for the purposes
of reducing vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled, and emissions.
• Facilitate private/public use of clean fuels technology.
• Continue to develop sustainable and green commuter rail stations and provide upgrades and
rehabilitation projects to reduce the environmental impact of the existing stations.
Support Transportation Choices Through Intermodalism and Accessibility
County residents will be served, where economically feasible, through the development of transportation
alternatives and travel options that consider the needs of a wide range of citizens.
• Work with transit providers and local social service agencies to provide specialized transit service to
meet a broad spectrum of socio-economic transit needs of seniors, veterans, persons with disabilities,
and low income residents.
• Leverage commuter and motorist assistance outreach channels in order to increase the awareness and
use of alternative commuting modes.
• Implement the Commission's commuter rail SRTPs and Southern California Regional Rail Authority's
(SCRRA or Metrolink) plan for commuter rail services.
• Continue to pursue the goals and objectives as outlined in the Coordinated Public Transit -Human
Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) for Riverside County related to a unified, comprehensive
but flexible strategy for transportation service delivery to address transportation gaps and/or barriers
focusing on unmet transportation needs of elderly individuals, persons with disabilities, and individuals
of limited income.
• Enhance security, surveillance, and emergency response capabilities of County transit facilities and
roadway infrastructure through proactive planning, interagency coordination, and investment.
Prioritize Public and Agency Communications
The Commission will provide timely, informative, and accurate reporting to encourage informed public and agency
participation in the Commission's decision -making processes.
4
• Promote a close working relationship with news and civic entities to increase interest and understanding
of transportation and related issues.
• Enhance the provision of public information through various forms of communication (e.g., website,
annual report, monthly newsletter, television, Speakers Bureau, print media, radio, etc.).
• Maintain an ongoing effort of informing Riverside County's Congressional and State Legislative
delegations regarding transportation issues.
• Develop an effective long-range legislative strategy regarding state and federal funding and policy.
• Protect and enhance flexibility in the Commission's use of state and federal transportation revenue in
addressing regional priorities and needs.
• Explore local options for sustainable funding in addressing long-term transportation and quality -of -life
needs for Riverside County.
• Seek legislative flexibility for innovation in financing, construction, and maintenance of regional
transportation projects.
• Pursue policy objectives contained in the Commission's comprehensive adopted legislative platforms.
• Maintain ongoing efforts to educate commuters, businesses, and the public regarding the Commission's
toll planning efforts and specific project development efforts underway.
• Keep the public informed about construction -related impacts from projects.
Financial and Administration Policies
Financial Planning Policies
• Administrative costs, including salaries and benefits, shall be funded by allocations from Measure A, LTF,
FSP, SAFE, and TUMF funds.
• The Commission shall budget no more than one percent (1%) of Measure A sales tax revenues for
administrative salaries and benefits.
• Administrative program delivery costs will be budgeted at whatever is reasonable and necessary, but not
to exceed four percent (4%) of Measure A sales tax revenues (inclusive of the one -percent salary
limitation). The Commission shall budget 100 percent of the annual required contribution related to the
postretirement health care benefits.
• The Commission shall utilize unexpended 1989 Measure A funds only for projects and programs included
in the 1989 Measure A. Sales tax revenues from the 2009 Measure A shall be expended only for projects
and programs included in the 2009 Measure A.
• Amounts will be budgeted by fiscal year for multi -year projects, based on best available estimates, with
the understanding that, to the extent actuals vary from those estimates and the project is ongoing,
adjustments will be made on a continual basis.
• The fiscal capital budget should be consistent with the strategic plan and deviations appropriately noted,
explained, and justified.
• A balanced budget shall be adopted annually with operating and capital expenditures and other
financing uses equal to or less than identified revenues and other financing sources as well as available
fund balances.
Revenue Policies
• Sales tax revenue projections will be revised semi-annually to ensure use of current and relevant data.
Staff may adjust annual amounts during the budget preparation process to reflect the most current
economic trends.
• A strategic application of local funding sources will be used to maximize federal and state funding of
projects.
• Fiduciary responsibility regarding Western County TUMF revenues shall be exercised, and revenues will
•
•
•
5
•
•
•
be allocated pursuant to Commission direction and the approved 2009 Measure A.
• Adopted toll revenue policies will establish congestion pricing in order to maximize throughput on toll
facilities. Such pricing will be adjusted quarterly by pre -defined formulas.
Debt Management Policies
• Outstanding sales tax revenue bonds shall not exceed $975 million.
• Toll revenue supported debt may be issued for specific highway projects and may comprise toll revenue
bonds and federal loans.
• The Commission will maintain 2.0x debt ratio coverage on all senior sales tax revenue debt and 1.3x debt
ratio coverage on all toll revenue debt.
• Debt issuance will be for major capital projects including engineering, right of way, and construction.
Operating requirements, if any, must be paid from current ongoing revenues and may not be financed
except for initial toll operations.
• Costs of issuance, including the standard underwriter's discount, will not exceed two percent (2%).
• The Commission may enter into interest rate swaps to better manage assets and liabilities and take
advantage of market conditions to lower overall costs and reduce interest rate risk.
• While it is the intent of the Commission to establish a cash debt reserve for long term bond issuance, as
necessary, surety bonds can be obtained when beneficial to the Commission.
• All sales tax revenue debt must mature prior to the termination of 2009 Measure A on June 30, 2039.
• All toll revenue supported debt must mature prior to the expiration of toll facility agreements.
Expenditure Accountability Policies
• Established priorities for planning and programming of capital projects will be reviewed annually with
the Commission.
• Actual expenditures will be compared to the budget on at least a quarterly basis, and significant
deviations will be appropriately noted, explained, and justified.
• Operations and maintenance agreements for toll operations will be implemented, and related costs will
be compared to toll financing assumptions.
Reserve Policies
• The Commission will maintain program reserves in accordance with Measure A and TDA policies and
guidelines.
• The Commission will establish and maintain a transit operator's reserve of 10 percent (10%) for the
Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Additionally, a 10 percent (10%) reserve will be established and
maintained for each of the Western County transit operators (public bus and commuter rail).
• The Commission will establish and maintain reserves for toll operations, capital improvements, and debt
service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements.
Cash Management and Investment Policies
• Where possible, the Commission will encourage receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts.
• Balances in the bank operating account will be maintained at the amount necessary to meet monthly
expenditures.
• Construction and operating funds will be invested per the Commission's established investment policy
emphasizing in order of priority: 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) yield.
• Cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultants will be completed in an expeditious
and timely manner.
6
Procurement Policies
• The Commission will conduct enhanced outreach to businesses and contractors located in Riverside
County regarding opportunities to provide the Commission with competitive and qualified goods and/or
services.
• The Commission will continuously evaluate its procurement program and policies to ensure competitive,
transparent, objective, and fair selection processes.
• The Commission will continue to expand and improve vendor access to contracting opportunities.
Auditing, Accounting, and Financial Reporting Policies
• The Commission will maintain its ERP system in order to integrate project and toll operations accounting
needs and improve accounting efficiency.
• The Commission will issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); separate financial reports
for the LTF, STA, Proposition 1B Rehabilitation and Security Project Accounts, and toll operations upon
commencement of such operations; and State Controller's Transportation Planning Agency Financial
Transactions Report as well as Government Compensation in California Report.
• An audit is to be conducted annually on the Commission's accounting books and records. As long as the
Commission has outstanding bonds and federal loans, an independent accounting firm must conduct the
audit.
• The Commission is responsible for ensuring that audits of Measure A and TDA funding recipients are
completed and reviewed for compliance and other matters in a timely manner.
Human Resources Management Policies
• While accommodating the assumption of toll operation responsibilities, Commission staffing levels will
be consistent with the intent of its enabling legislation, which envisioned a small, but effective staff.
• Contract staff and consultants will be used to augment staff efforts as much as necessary to support
programs or workloads, which do not appear to be of a permanent nature.
Information Technology Management Policy
• Significant effort will be made to maintain efficient and cost-effective technology infrastructure by
continuously upgrading network equipment and software to ensure quality performance, productivity,
and connectivity among staff, other agencies, toll operator, and the public. Network security will
continue to be a top priority to maintain the integrity of the Commission's network and information.
•
•
7
•
•
•
Linking Commission Policy Goals and Departmental Goals and Objectives
The following matrix (Table 19) illustrates the linkage of the Commission's overall policy goals described in this
section to the individual departmental goals and objectives included in Section 6.
Table 19 — Relationship Between Commission and Departmental Goals
toox#s Svsf ri 3viro mental Econ
Depa trtaent tveiiility Rbventent fttIoenti8s S#ewards hip Deve3e
Management Services
Executive Management
Administration
Legislative Affairs & Communications
Faience
Regional Programs
Planning and Frogrammmg
Rail Maintenance and Operations
Public and Specialized Transit
Commuter Assistance
Motorist Assistance
Capital Project Development & Delivery
A
ion
Add "X" to Environmental Stewardship and Intermodalism & Accessibility categories for Motorist Assistance
8
AGENDA ITEM 8
•
•
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 24, 2014
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Support of the University of California, Riverside Application for Designation
as a Manufacturing Community as Part of the United States Department of
Commerce Investing in Manufacturing Communities Partnership
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Authorize the Executive Director to provide a letter of support for the University of
California (UC) Riverside's application for designation as a manufacturing community
(Manufacturing Community) as part of the U.S. Department of Commerce Investing in
Manufacturing Communities Partnership (ICMP);
2) Adopt Resolution No. 14-014, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Certifying Support for the University of California Riverside's Application for
Designation as a Manufacturing Community as Part of the U.S. Department of
Commerce Investing and Manufacturing Communities Partnership";
3) Work in cooperation with UC Riverside and the San Bernardino Associated Governments
(SANBAG) in providing information and support for the application; and
4) Forward to the Commission for final action.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration announced a
competitive, government -wide initiative to help communities "...cultivate an environment for
businesses to create well -paying manufacturing jobs in regions across the country and thereby
accelerate the resurgence of manufacturing."
The program will select up to 12 communities to be designated as Manufacturing Communities,
which would provide these areas with preferential consideration in the determination of grant
funding from a variety of federal sources. Among these grant sources is the Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER)
program, a program that initially enabled the Commission to receive a TIFIA loan for the State
Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR -91 CIP). In addition to preferential consideration
from the DOT, nine additional cabinet departments will provide support for grant opportunities
involving education, agriculture, small business, housing, and the environment.
Agenda Item 8
9
Responding to the Opportunity
UC Riverside is heading a proposal to designate all of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties as
a Manufacturing Community. The combined two -county area fits nicely in the Commerce
Department's definition of an eligible applicant for the program. As part of its effort,
UC Riverside garnered the support of government agencies such as the county of Riverside,
education and business interests, and the legislative delegations from both counties. The
competition for the designation will certainly be fierce and might include Los Angeles and the
Silicon Valley.
Why It's Important to the Commission
Transportation clearly has a role in acting as a catalyst for job creation, and the Commission has
taken a wider view of the interaction between transportation investment and the local
economy. As an example, the 2009 Measure A Expenditure Plan allocated funding specifically
for projects in Western Riverside County that would spur economic development. Additional
efforts to reach out to local businesses and suppliers are yet another way the Commission will
continue to be supportive of the local economy.
Finally, the Commission has a successful track record with the TIGER program on the SR -91 CIP.
Approval of the UC Riverside application for Manufacturing Community status would
undoubtedly be of benefit to the local economy, and the Commission's experience with the
DOT would benefit the effort while also providing the Commission with improved leverage in
competing for federal funding.
The deadline for the federal application is April 14, which would make Commission approval of
an endorsement for the effort especially timely. There is no financial impact for support of
such an effort.
Attachment: Resolution No. 14-014
•
Agenda Item 8
10
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 14-014
RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CERTIFYING SUPPORT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE'S
APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATION AS A MANUFACTURING COMMUNITY AS
PART OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE INVESTING AND
MANUFACTURING COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration
has announced a federal interagency competition to designate up to 12 communities as
manufacturing communities (Manufacturing Communities) through the Investing in
Manufacturing Communities Partnership (IMCP) for a period of two years; and
WHEREAS, Manufacturing Communities will receive preference for a range of future
federal economic development funding and technical assistance offered by IMCP participating
agencies; and
WHEREAS, one identified source of preferential grant funding includes that U.S.
Department of Transportation's Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery
(TIGER) program; and
WHEREAS, the Commission successfully competed for TIGER grants in the past; and
WHEREAS, the University of California (UC) Riverside requests the Commission's
support to submit a proposal to benefit the Inland Empire's Manufacturing Community; and
WHEREAS, UC Riverside demonstrated previous and ongoing leadership in
coordinating economic development for job creation, entrepreneurship, innovation in reducing
emissions, industry attraction, and innovation based activities such as supporting incubator, tech
transfer within the Inland Empire; and
WHEREAS, UC Riverside's experience in managing extramural grants and contracts
(>$100 million per year) prepare it well to serve the proposed project as the project lead; and
WHEREAS, the county of Riverside would benefit from the cultivation of an
environment for businesses to create well -paying manufacturing jobs in the Inland Empire; and
WHEREAS, a coordinated approach that attracts private investment from new and
existing manufacturers will lead to broad -based prosperity and bolster the county's economic
health; and
WHEREAS, a healthy and growing economy, which includes manufacturing growth,
will create jobs and bolster Measure A sales tax revenue; and
BE IT RESOLVED, the Commission supports the UC Riverside IMCP application; and
11
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Commission agrees to participate and assist
UC Riverside in all phases of the IMCP project.
ADOPTED by the Commission at its meeting on the 9th day of April, 2014.
Marion Ashley, Chair
Riverside County Transportation Commission
ATTEST:
Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board
Riverside County Transportation Commission
•
•
•
12
AGENDA ITEM 9
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 24, 2014
TO:
Budget and Implementation Committee
FROM:
Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager
THROUGH:
John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
State Legislative Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Adopt the following state bill positions:
a) AB 515 (Dickinson) — Seek Amendments;
b) AB 2197 (Mullin) —Support;
c) SB 785 (Wolk) — Support if Amended;
d) SB 969 (DeSaulnier) — Oppose Unless Amended; and
e) SB 990 (Vidak) — Oppose.
2) Forward to the Commission for final action.
• BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
•
AB 515 (Dickinson)
Staff Recommendation: SEEK AMENDMENTS
This bill pertaining to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) reform was discussed by the
Commission's Quality of Life and Sustainability Ad Hoc Committee and at the 2014 Commission
Workshop in January. AB 515 proposes to require the courts to specify actions that must be
taken by an agency to remedy CEQA violations and a timeframe within which those violations
must be taken. Requiring this level of specificity could be helpful to ensure a judge's writ of
mandate is not overly vague. However, AB 515 currently infers public comments should be
considered in the agency's return to the writ, which could further delay and complicate
resolution of court cases. The Commission seeks an amendment that would clarify no
additional public comments are required in an agency's return to the court.
AB 2197 (Mullin)
Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT
This bill would require a temporary license plate system be developed by the Department of
Motor Vehicles (DMV). AB 2197 would require this new system to be operative by July 1, 2015.
Currently, upon purchasing a vehicle an owner has 90 days to affix license plates to the vehicle
Agenda Item 9
13
insofar as a copy of the proof of sale is displayed on the car. Vehicle auto dealerships are
required to report sales to the DMV to initiate registration and processing of license plates for
the vehicle. In 2011, the Legislature required all dealerships to participate in an electronic
registration system to speed up the registration and license plate process. While in a vast
majority of cases this system works well, the time delay in receiving license plates creates
opportunities for criminal activity and increases the burden on law enforcement to identify
vehicles.
One problem created by vehicles without license plates is toll evasion. The Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) estimates vehicles without plates incur $12 million in toll
violations. Currently FasTrak toll systems in California rely on photo enforcement of violations.
These violations translate to a loss of revenue needed to maintain and operate toll facilities
that rely on users to pay their fair share of costs for use of the infrastructure.
This bill would ensure all lawfully purchased vehicles leave the dealership with some form of
identification that can be read from the roadway by law enforcement. AB 2197 allows the DMV
flexibility to use "weatherproof paper or other media selected by the department" that can be
printed on a standard laser printer from the dealership. Data regarding the vehicle's owner
would be restricted to law enforcement use only, and must be transmitted by the dealership
within two business days of the vehicle's purchase.
Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have temporary license plate programs similar to
what is proposed in AB 2197, including Arizona, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, and Virginia.
Staff believes this bill protects the Commission's financial obligations to State Route 91 and
Interstate 15 express lanes and strengthens the nexus between the users of these lanes and the
benefits received. Additionally, law enforcement will be able to more easily identify vehicles
involved in other traffic violations or crimes.
SB 785 (Wolk)
Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT IF AMENDED
This bill consolidates a number of existing statutes authorizing local governments to use
design -build for certain types of projects. Design -build for public transit projects is included in
the consolidation. The effect is the transit design -build program's sunset date is eliminated and
the program is made permanent. This is a positive change.
However, the Commission is seeking amendments to the existing law that would qualify the
Commission to use design -build for transit projects. Currently only public transit operators are
eligible. The Commission's lobbyist in Sacramento communicated with Senator Wolk's office
about amending SB 785 to include county transportation commissions as eligible; the response
has been warm. Therefore, staff seeks a Support if Amended position on SB 785 in the event
the Commission's amendments are accepted into the bill.
•
Agenda Item 9
14
•
•
•
In the meantime, the California Transit Association (CTA) also introduced SB 1433 (Hill), which
exclusively addresses the transit design -build statutes and includes the Commission's requested
language. Given the Commission's direction to seek such language in CTA's bill at its January
2014 meeting, Chair Marion Ashley already authored a letter of support for SB 1433.
SB 969 (DeSaulnier)
Staff Recommendation: OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED
This bill requires the establishment of peer review groups for "mega -projects" exceeding
$1 billion in total cost. The bill also requires agencies responsible for mega -projects to:
a) Establish a comprehensive risk management plan;
b) Qualify the effect of identified risks in financial terms;
c) Develop and maintain documents to track identified risks and related mitigation steps;
d) Regularly update its estimates of capital and capital outlay support costs;
e) Regularly reassess its reserves for potential claims and unknown risks, incorporating
information related to risks identified and quantified through its risk assessment
process; and
f) Regularly integrate estimates for capital, capital outlay support costs, and contingency
reserves into a program -wide report.
While the goals of ensuring rigorous oversight of major public works projects are laudable,
SB 969 duplicates existing measures and controls. Mega projects require financing, which
requires credit ratings and thorough examination by investors. Through this process, agencies
must commit to risk mitigation and demonstrate accountability to bondholders. Additionally,
federal agencies have stringent requirements for projects receiving federal assistance, which is
usually the case with mega -projects. For example, the SR -91 Corridor Improvement Project
TIFIA loan required detailed risk management policies, financial reserves, and other
contingencies in order for the U.S. Department of Transportation Credit Council to approve the
loan. The Perris Valley Line (PVL) project, while well under $1 billion, received extensive project
oversight from an independent consultant who reported to the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) on all project activities.
Staff is supportive of ensuring that projects with major public investments are properly
monitored for performance and risk. However, staff believes that creation of an additional
state policy on risk management and peer review is redundant and complicates federally -
mandated policies that currently exist for these projects. Given the bill author's concerns about
project oversight stem from the Bay Bridge east span project, staff suggests the Commission
propose the bill be amended to be limited to state -sponsored projects.
Agenda Item 9
15
SB 990 (Vidak)
Staff Recommendation: OPPOSE
This bill would require 5 percent of Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds and funds from the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) be set -aside by agencies such as the
Commission for disadvantaged small communities for congestion relief and safety needs.
For reference, the terms above are defined as follows:
Local Transportation Fund: the Transit Development Act (TDA) devotes 1/4 cent of the state sales
tax to regional transportation agencies such as the Commission for transportation planning,
transit operations, and in some cases, local streets and roads. The Commission uses LTF for bus
transit and rail operations throughout the county, as well as bicycle and pedestrian projects
such as the Nuevo Road pedestrian bridge and sidewalk in the city of Perris, and Monroe Street
sidewalk and bike lanes in the city of Indio.
Regional Transportation Improvement Program: 75 percent of the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) is sub -allocated by law to regional agencies such as the
Commission for programming on projects of our choice. The state retains the other 25 percent
for interregional projects of state significance. In recent years, the Commission used RTIP funds
for PVL, East Junction, I-10/Jefferson interchange, and SR -60 truck climbing lane to name a few.
Disadvantaged Small Community: a city or census -designated place with a population of 25,000
or fewer people and a median household income less than 80 percent of the statewide average.
Staff recommends opposition to SB 990 for a variety of reasons:
• The bill violates the following provisions of the Commission's adopted 2014 legislative
platform:
o Project selection and planning authority for state/federal funds should be as
local as possible, preferably in the hands of the Commission.
o Oppose efforts to infringe on the Commission's revenue sources including, but
not limited to, Measure A, tolls, and TUMF.
• RTIP funds are typically used on major highway or transit projects serving regional
needs. Cutting up the program for smaller projects limits the Commission's ability to
address regional transportation issues.
•
Agenda Item 9
16
•
•
•
o In 2006, the Commission and the city of Blythe entered into an agreement to
swap RTIP dollars for Measure A dollars to give Blythe more certainty and local
control compared to trying to compete for RTIP funds. This type of successful
partnership should not be legislated, but left to local governments to work out
among themselves.
• State funding is scarce and is often used to supplement local dollars, which constitute
the majority of the funds on any given project. SB 990 is another example of the state
attempting to micromanage a decreasing funding source, with the effect of making it
less useful to resolve California's overall transportation challenges.
• This bill would reduce funding available for transit services in Riverside County, which
often crucial to small and disadvantaged communities.
The Commission historically opposed federal and state legislation that seeks to limit local
flexibility for how funds are used. The Commission administers competitive processes to award
funds to projects that are most able to meet countywide goals and go to construction quickly.
The Technical Advisory Committee of public works directors from all cities and the county has
overseen a fair and equitable process of distributing scarce dollars. The Commission believes
the Legislature should allow these successful models to continue without interference.
Attachment: Legislative Matrix
Agenda Item 9
17
RIVERSISUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STA1OD FEDERAL LEGISLATION — March 2014
•
`'' o s 6 •..
M' ` t
_
i. �mY'�'
Vi4f
AB 515
(Dickinson)
This bill pertains to CEQA reform . AB 515 proposes to require the courts to specify
actions which must be taken by an agency to remedy CEQA violations and a timeframe
within which those violations must be taken .
Referred to Coms . on
E .Q. and JUD.
(Feb. 6, 2014) .
Pending Commission
Approval
AB 2197
(Mullin)
This bill w ould require that temporary license plate system be dev eloped by the
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) . AB 2197 would require this new system to be
operative by July 1, 2015. This bill would ensure that all lawfully purchased vehicles
leave the dealership with some form of identification that can be read from the
roadway by law enforcement.
Referred to C oms. on
E .Q. and JUD .
(Feb . 6, 2014) .
Pending Commission
Approval
SB 785 (Wolk)
This bill consolidates a number of existing statutes authorizing local governments to
use design -build for certain types of projects . Design -build for public transit projects is
included in the consolidation.
In Assembly . Read third
time . Passed. (Ayes 35.
Noes 0. Page 2653.)
Ordered to the Assembly .
(Jan . 27, 2014)
Pe nding Commission
Approval
SB 969
(DeSaulnier)
The bill would require the agency administering a megaproject to establish a peer
rev iew group and to take specified actions to manage the risks associated with a
megaproject including establishing a comprehensive risk management plan, and
regularly reassessing its reserves for potential claims and unknown risks . Because this
bill would require local agencies to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a
state -mandated local program.
Referred to Com . on
T. & H. (Feb. 20, 2014)
Pending Commission
Approval
SB 990 (Vidak)
This bill would require that 5% of Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and funds from the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) be set -aside by agencies such as
the Co mmission for disadvantaged small communities for congestion relief and safety
needs.
Referred to Com. on
T. & H. (Feb . 20, 2014)
Pending Commissio n
Approval
AB 1721
(Linder)
Today, state law prohibits tolling of zero -emission vehicles in designated high-
occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. This bill would exclude from the above -described
exemption a toll imposed for passage in HOT lanes designated for State Highway
Route 15 in Riverside County.
Referred to Com . on
TRANS . (Feb . 27, 2014)
SPONSOR
January 8, 2014
SB 953 (Ro th)
This bill will provide parking enforcement authority to RCTC for the Metrolink
commuter rail statio ns we own and operate for the residents of Riverside County.
Referred to Com. on
T. & H. (Feb. 20, 2014)
SPO NSOR
January 8, 2014
AB 14
(Lo wenthal)
Formalizes creation of a State Freight Advisory Council and commits the state to
autho ring a State Freight Plan every 5 years, pursuant to MAP -21.
Appr oved by the
Governor. (Sept. 6, 2013) .
Chaptered by Secretary
of State — Chapter 223,
Statutes of 2013 .
(Sept. 6).
SUPPORT
April 13, 2013
18
k �XYL3SJ , f
fii
ft
,, ,✓ ,) ---'�-+ . :.K,,- , __
+wee
AB 179
(Boganegra)
Pre vious version reduced the amount of time transportation agencies can retain
personally identifiable customer information for electronically -collected highway tolls
and transit fares, from 4.5 years to six months. Amendments ext end th e time peri od
back to 4.5 years, removing a conflict with the statute of limitations during which
customers can challenge tolls and fare charges, which is up to 4 years. The bill also
enacts new privacy provisions for electronic transit fare collection. Unknown impacts
exist for transit operators RTA, SunLine and Metrolink for future implementation of
electronic fare systems.
Approved by the
Governor.
(Sept. 27, 2013).
Chaptered by Secretary
of State — Chapter 375,
Statutes of 2013.
(Sept. 27) .
NEUTRAL
June 12, 2013
AB 266
(Blumen field)
Extends by an additional 10 years a pilot program previously opposed by RCTC. Ultra-
low emission vehicles (mostly electric cars) are exempted from paying tolls on t olled
facilities, except for toll projects in L.A . County . This bill represents a state mandate
that cuts into local revenue for infrastructure that local governments are providing to
the state. This policy erodes the user -pay concept inherent in many areas of
transportation finance. This bill represents a current and future threat to the viability
of innovative infrastructure financing in California as low -emission vehicles become
mo re popular. The pilot program has only been in existence for less than one year .
Approved by the
Governor.
(Sept. 28, 2013).
Chaptered by Secretary
of State — Chapter 405,
Statutes of 2013 .
(Sept. 28).
OPPOSE
April 13, 2013
AB 487 (Linder)
Requires government employees participating in the DMV confidentiality program to
provide a workplace address so that parking, toll, and traffic violations can still be
enforced.
Died pursuant to Art. IV,
Sec . 10(c) of the
Constitution .
(Jan . 31, 2014) .
From committee: Filed
with the Chief Clerk
pursuant to Joint Rule 56 .
(Feb. 3, 2014).
SUPPORT
April 13, 2013
AB 574
(Lo wenthal)
Formerly, this bill reformed the process by which cities and counties apply to the State
for relinquishment of state highways to local jurisdictions. The bill has been amended
in its entirety.
The bill no w propo ses policy to guide the e xpenditure of the state's cap -and -trade
program, which was authorized by AB 32 (Pavley, 2006) and is administered by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB). The bill provides for regional control of the
expenditure of cap -and -trade funds. The Commission, along with SCAG and other
transportation commissions in Southern California have requested amendments that
would direct cap -and -trade funds to directly to transportation commissions rather
than Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO's)
Died pursuant to Art . IV,
Sec . 10(c) of the
Constitutio n.
(Jan. 31, 2014).
From committee: Filed
with the Chief Clerk
pursuant to Joint Rule 56 .
(Feb. 3, 2014).
SUPPORT if Amended
June 12, 2013
AB 1081
(Medina)
Requires goods movement infrastructure projects and financing options from the
private sector to be included in the Governor's annually submitted 5 -year
infrastructure plan and international trade & investment strategy.
In committee: Held under
submission.
(August 30, 2013).
SUPPORT
June 12, 2013
AK
19
'x"i,'7 e" t-• h�4 r. �
c .' ` ^,
it
SB 337
(Emmers on)
Relinquishes portions of SR -74 to the City of Hemet. The City of Hemet is the sponsor
of this bill. This bill builds on previous legislation that authorized relinquishment of
SR -74 to the Cities of Palm Desert, Perris, and Lake Elsinore.
Returned to Secretary of
Senate pursuant to Joint
Rule 56. (Feb . 3, 2014)
Hearing cancelled at
request of author. This
bill's language has been
incorporated into SB 788,
the Senate
Transportation Omnibus
Bill.
SUPPORT
April 13, 2013
SB 731
(Steinberg)
Enacts modest changes to CEQA, mostly relating to private development .
Joint Rule 62(a) file
notice suspended. (Page
3247). (Sept . 11, 2013).
Set, First hearing .
Hearing cancelled at the
request of author.
(Sept. 11, 2013) .
MONITOR/WORK
WITH AUTHOR
April 13, 2013
AB 37
(Perea)
This bill would allow would allow project applicants to require lead agencies to
prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of CEQA
documents. This has the potential to accelerate future judicial proceedings by giving
both sides of a CEQA lawsuit the opportunity to prepare for court. AB 37 is supported
by business groups and is currently unopposed, awaiting a vote on the Assembly floor .
Re -referred to Com . On L.
& I .R. (Aug . 14, 2013).
SUPPORT
June 12, 2013
AB 401
(Daly)
Authorizes the use of best value design -build for the 1-405 widening project by OCTA.
The language of this bill is nearly identical to that of the Commission's AB 2098
(Miller), which was approved in 2010. The project will add one general purpose lane
in each direction.
Approved by the
Governor. (Oct. 5, 2013) .
Chaptered by Secretary
of State — Chapter 586,
Statutes of 2013.
(Oct . 5).
SUPPORT
June 12, 2013
AB 543
(Campos)
This bill would require a lead agency to translate, as specified, certain notices required
by the act and a summary of any negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration,
or environmental impact report when a group of non -English-speaking people, as
defined, comprises at least 25% of the population within the lead agency's jurisdiction
and the project is proposed to be located at or near an area where the group of non-
English -speaking people comprises at least 25% of the residents of that area. By
requiring a lead agency to translate these notices and documents, this bill would
impo se a state -mandated local program.
In committee: Set, first
hearing . Hearing
canceled at the request
of author. (July 2, 2013) .
OPPOSE
June 12, 2013
20
fegislatio n/
,Author
b .'i w .,
e
!t ,
a
.
Date of B oard
,. ;•,
AB 756
(Melendez)
Allows public works projects to be granted Leadership designation by the Governor for
the purposes of a 2011 law that provides expedited judicial review for CEQA
challenges.
The Commission seeks amendments that would clarify elgibility of regional
transportation agencies (such as the Commission) to utilize this fast -tracking for public
transit projects .
Note: the underlying 2011 law has recently been ruled unconstitutional.
Died pursuant to Art. IV,
Sec . 10(c) of the
Constitution .
(Jan. 31, 2014) .
From committee: Filed
with the Chief Clerk
pursuant to Joint Rule 56 .
(Feb. 3, 2014).
SUPPORT if Amended
June 12, 2013
SB 778
(Co mmittee on
Transpo rtation
& Ho using)
Senate "omnibus" bill of non -controversial items . This omnibus includes language
from SB 337 (Emmerson), which relinquishes SR -74 to the city of Hemet . Other
provisions of the bill include non -substantive technical corrections to existing law and
deletion of obsolete provisions such as the 1984 Olympics special license plate
program.
Returned to Secretary of
Senate pursuant to Joint
Rule 56. (Feb . 3, 2014) .
SUPPORT
June 12, 2013
AB 493
(Daly)
This bill would autho rize operators of toll facilities on federal -aid highways to fully
implement techno logies or business practices that provide for the interoperability of
electronic toll collection programs on and after the date specified in MAP -21. The bill
would limit the information that may be disclosed through participation in an
interoperability program, as specified.
Approved by the
Governor .
(Aug. 12, 2013) .
Chaptered by Secretary
of State — Chapter 79,
Statutes of 2013.
(Aug . 12) .
SUPP ORT
June 12, 2013
•
•
•
21.
3/24/2014
State Legislation
Budget and Implementation Committee
March 24, 2014
AB 515 Dickinson
• Requires court to specify actions needed to
correct a CEQA document found out of
compliance.
• Requires timelines for return to the court and
final decision by court.
• Implies new comment period needed for
revised CEQA document.
• Staff Recommendation: SEEK AMENDMENTS
1
3/24/2014
• Requires temporary license plates
• Public safety benefits, combats toll evasion
• 16 states + DC already have similar programs
• Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT
• Consolidates and standardizes design -build
statutes for various types of projects, including
transit.
• Eliminates sunset date on transit design -build
pilot program.
• Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT IF AMENDED
— Seek clarification that RCTC can use design -build for
transit projects.
2
3/24/2014
• For projects over $1 billion in total cost:
— Peer review committees
— Comprehensive risk management plan
— Ongoing tracking, assessment, and reporting of risks
• Federal requirements already require careful
monitoring and disclosure of risk
• Staff Recommendation: OPPOSE UNLESS
AMENDED
— Seek narrowing of scope to state projects only.
• Reserves 5 percent of the Local Transportation
Fund (LTF) in any county and 5 percent of the
Regional Transportation Improvement
Program (RTIP) for disadvantaged small
communities.
• RCTC holds broad discretion over these funds.
• Limits local control.
• Staff Recommendation: OPPOSE
3
3/24/2014
Questions?
AB 515 (Dickinson)
AB 2197 (Mullin)
AB 785 (Wolk)
SB 969 (DeSaulnier
SB 990 (Vidak)
4
Tara Byerly
From: Tara Byerly
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 7:39 AM
To: Tara Byerly
Cc: Jennifer Harmon
Subject: RCTC: Budget and Implementation Committee Agenda - 03.24.2014
Importance: High
Good morning Budget and Implementation Committee Members:
Attached below is the link to the Budget and Implementation Committee agenda for the meeting scheduled @
9:30 a.m. on Monday, March 24.
http://www.rctc.org/uploads/media items/budget-and-implementation-committee-march-24-2014.original.pdf
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.
Respectfully,
Tara S. Byerly
Senior Administrative Assistant
RCTC
4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 787-7141
1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
ROLL CALL
MARCH 24, 2014
County of Riverside, District II
County of Riverside, District III
City of Beaumont
Present
0
2r
Absent
City of Calimesa
City of Canyon Lake 2r
0
City of Cathedral City
City of Coachella
City of Desert Hot Springs
,2r
0
City of Hemet
City of Indian Wells
0
City of Lake Elsinore �' D
City of Murrieta
City of Riverside
City of Temecula
)7K
0
<LILAi J 9 S0 «. rn
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE SIGN -IN SHEET
MARCH 24, 2014
NAME
AGENCY
E_
EMAIL ADDRESS
Sif» (•-e/i6:1,0 _
Coccci
G./fir,ci ,SAA,MIA
/4L ie`er
I1
A- .>-=/s' ,3.-1-,5 ye__
=____:-
-T�(
\Z� 0r` �j'c
'/
�e A:�1
/-Jfr._15---— n- L.
6dv ryj>)----
�i /v ,egz
/ s
/ Folf_co i-1
. -/----4----/ ----A,.._,-4,,,,
L-// - AY/',- 4,,, % c-
/ YT
�%). �/ w
�j» v/ �Ci1��JT
5--- MA -r/1-5
DIr.5i ; 2.7 , ?i S
ib.CK G(6
,x -L ,'2-,zr -;