HomeMy Public PortalAboutResolution No. 23-007 - Resolution accepting KCI Technologies, Inc. proposal for provision of pavement, sidewalk and additional city assetsSponsored By: Interim City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 23-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OPA-
LOCKA, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL FROM KCI
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE PROVISION OF PAVEMENT,
SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION
ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
NO. 22-0912200 AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH KCI
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR SAID SERVICES; PROVIDING FOR
INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2022, the City of Opa-Locka ("City") published Request for
Proposals (RFP) 22-0912200 for Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City Assets
Condition Assessment; and
WHEREAS, three (3) sealed proposals were received by the City Clerk's Office and
certified by the City Clerk on September 19, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Evaluation Committee reviewed the proposals and subsequently
selected KCI Technologies, Inc. as the most responsive and responsible bidder; and
WHEREAS, the services requested by this RFP is for a comprehensive survey of 100%
of City roadways and sidewalks to evaluate current status, including the presence or
absence sidewalks. From this survey a database will be developed and a long-term
management and maintenance plan will be developed to identify future budget
requirements and to ensure the City moves forward in the upgrade and maintenance of
its roadway and sidewalk infrastructure in a comprehensive, focused and coherent
manner; and
WHEREAS, this service will be accomplished by using camera -equipped vehicles
which will traverse every City street to electronically capture street and sidewalk
conditions for evaluation and subsequent development of a long-term management and
maintenance plan. Also, an evaluation of the condition of adjacent trees, street lights,
pavement markings, traffic signage and the location of water -sewer and stormwater
surface infrastructure can also be conducted at the same time; and
WHEREAS, KCI Technologies, Inc. has proposed a bid price of One Hundred Ninety -
Nine Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety -Two Dollars ($199,392.00); and
WHEREAS, the Interim City Manager recommends the City Commission approve the
recommendation for KCI Technologies, Inc. and enter into an agreement with said
company; and
Resolution No. 23-007
WHEREAS, the City Commission accepts the proposal of KCI Technologies, Inc. for
Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City Assets Condition Assessment, pursuant to
Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 22-0912200, and further authorizes the Interim City
Manager to enter into an agreement with KCI Technologies, Inc. for said services,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DULY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF OPA- LOCKA, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The recitals to the preamble herein are incorporated by reference.
SECTION 2. AUTHORIZATION
The City Commission of the City of Opa-Locka, Florida hereby accepts the proposal from
KCI Technologies, Inc. for the provision of Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City
Assets Condition Assessment, pursuant to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 22-0912200
and further authorizes the Interim City Manager to enter into an agreement with KCI
Technologies, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit "A", for said services, in amount not to
exceed One Hundred Ninety -Nine Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety -Two Dollars
($199,392.00).
SECTION 3. SCRIVENER'S ERRORS
Sections of this Resolution may be renumbered or re -lettered and corrections of
typographical errors, which do not affect the intent of this Resolution may be authorized
by the Interim City Manager, following review by the City Attorney, without need of
public hearing, by filing a corrected copy of same with the City Clerk.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Resolution shall take effect upon the adoption and is subject to the approval of the
Governor or Governor's Designee.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 11th day of January, 2023.
John Ta lor, Mayor
Resolution No. 23-007
A EST:
a Flores, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
.riadette orris -Weeks, P.A.
Moved by: Commissioner Kelley
Seconded by: Commissioner Williams
VOTE:
5-0
Commissioner Bass YES
Commissioner Kelley YES
Commissioner Williams YES
Vice Mayor Ervin YES
Mayor Taylor YES
City of Opa-locka
Agenda Cover Memo
Department
Director:
Department Director
Signature:
City Manager:
Darvin Williams
CM Signature:
Commission
Meeting Date:
Item Type:
Resolution
Ordinance
Other
01.11.2023
(EnterX in box)
X
Fiscal Impact:
(EnterX in box)
Yes
Ordinance Reading:
1St Reading
2nd Reading
No
(EnterX in box)
X
Public Hearing:
Yes
No
Yes
No
(EnterX in box)
X
X
(Enter Fund &
Dept)
Advertising Requirement
Yes
No
Funding Source:
Account# :
Ex:
See Financial
Impact
Section
(EnterX in box)
X
Contract/P.O.
Yes
No
RFP/RFQ/Bid#:
Required:
(EnterX in box)
X
Strategic Plan
Yes
No
Strategic Plan Priority Area:
Strategic Plan Obj./Strategy:
Related
(EnterX in box)
X
Enhance Organizational g 0
Bus. & Economic Dev M
Public Safety mg
Quality of Education 0
Qual. of Life & City Image a
Communication In
(list the specific objective/strategy this
item will address)
Sponsor Name
City Manager
Department:
City Manager
Short Title:
A resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept the proposal of KCI Technologies, Inc. Pavement, Sidewalk,
and Additional City Assets Condition Assessment pursuant to RFP No. 22-0912200 and further authorizing the
Interim City Manager to enter into an agreement with KCI Technologies, Inc.
Staff Summary:
Request for Proposals (RFP) 22-0912200 was published on August 9, 2022 for Pavement, Sidewalk, and
Additional City Assets Condition Assessment. The service requested by this RFP is a comprehensive survey of
100% of City roadways and sidewalks to evaluate current status, including the presence or absence sidewalks.
From this survey a database will be developed and a long-term management and maintenance plan will be
developed to identify future budget requirements and to ensure the City moves forward in the upgrade and
maintenance of its roadway and sidewalk infrastructure in a comprehensive, focused and coherent manner.
This service is accomplished by using camera -equipped vehicles which traverse every City street to
electronically capture street and sidewalk conditions for evaluation and subsequent development of a long-
term management and maintenance plan. An evaluation of the condition of adjacent trees, street lights,
pavement markings, traffic signage and the location of water -sewer and stormwater surface infrastructure can
also be conducted at the same time.
Three (3) companies submitted proposals/documents which were certified by the City Clerk on September
19, 2022.
The Evaluation Committee reviewed the proposals and subsequently selected KCI Technologies, Inc. as the
most responsive responsible bidder.
The proposals are listed in order from highest to lowest ranking based on Evaluation Committee scoring.
(1st)
KCI Technologies, Inc. was ranked first. The company has over 66 years of experience providing professional
engineering and assessment services for a variety of clients. KCI has the necessary resources, expertise, and
experience to manage and execute an agreement with the City of Opa-locka.
(2nd)
IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LP was ranked second. The company is an industry leader with 37
years of pavement and asset management experience. City their founding in 1985, they have provided services
like those requested by the city to more than 1,000 municipalities across the United States.
(3rd)
S&ME, Inc. was ranked second. The staff has experience, qualifications, and technical competence to perform
the Pavement Survey and Evaluation services from field surveys to designs and Pavement Management
Program implementation.
Financial Impact: This project was originally budgeted in FY 22 for $52,000 in the Roads and Illegal Dumping
Division, Other Professional Services. Since the selection of a contractor has been deferred until now, these
funds were unused in FY 22 and will be rolled forward into FY 23 for this purpose. For the core services of
roadways and sidewalk assessment, KCI Technologies, Inc. has proposed a cost of $142,107. Additionally, to
assess roadway markings, traffic signage, adjacent trees and streetlights, as well as locating water -sewer and
stormwater surface infrastructure, KCI Technologies, Inc. has proposed an additional cost of $57,285, which
results in a total cost of $199,392. Although this will require an additional funding of $147,392 above the
$52,000 being rolled over from FY 22, staff believes this project is extremely important to establish an
infrastructure baseline upon which future maintenance and upgrades can be scheduled in a coherent and
focused manner. Consequently, staff recommends that the complete range of proposed services be approved
with the additional funding of $147,107 to be sourced from General Fund Available Fund Balance in the next
budget amendment.
Proposed Action:
Staff recommends the City Commission approve the recommendation for KCI Technologies, Inc., based on the
Selection Committee review, scoring and ranking, for the complete range of proposed services for $199,392
and authorize the Interim City Manager to enter into an agreement with said company.
Attachment:
RFP No. 22-0912200
Bid Certification
Committee Evaluation Forms
Bid Proposals
Sha'mecca Lawson
Assistant City Manager
City of Opa-locka
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
CERTIFICATION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RFP NO. 22-0912200
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION
ASSESSMENT
I, Joanna Flores, City Clerk of the City of Opa-locka, Florida, do hereby certify that sealed
proposal(s) were received and opened at the Opa-locka Municipal Complex, 780 Fisherman
Street, 4th Floor, Opa-locka, Florida, at 3:00 p.m. this 19th day of September, 2022.
PROPOSAL(S) RECEIVE
NAME/ADDRESS LUMP SUM PRICE
1. IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LP
8380 S. Kyrene Road, Suite 101
Tempe, AZ 85284
Contact: Dan White, Client Services Manager
Tele: (480) 839-4347
Email: dwhiteliD,iansaaal sis.eom
2. KCI Technologies, Inc.
1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Contact: Heidi ammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
Tele: (410) 472-5937
Email: ? eicliaauaaianael�,)kci.cola
3. S&ME, Inc.
1615 Edgewater Drive, Suite 200
Orlando, FL 32804
Contact: Stewart Laney, Vice President -Transportation
Tele: (704) 523-4726
Email: slaaeyl&snveins.com
$181,122.00
$199,392.00
$ 57,500.00
Please note that all proposals were submitted via Demand Star (e -bid) and provided to the City
Clerk by the City Manager's Office on Monday, September 19, 2022.
I further certify that proposal(s) were submitted and properly opened in the presence of the
following:
Jo. na Flores, CMC
City Clerk
City of Opa-locka
EVALUATION MATRIX
RFP No. 22-0912200
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Reviewer Name:
Weight
Technical Approach,
Management, and Project
Understanding
25%
Qualifications of Key Personnel
15%
Past Performance/Similar
Experience
1500
Cost and Project Resources
and Approach
5%
QAIQC Plan 10%
Total 100%
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Reviewer Name:
Weight
Technical Approach,
Management, and Project 25%
Understanding
Qualifications of Key Personnel 15%
Past Performance/Similar
Experience
15%
Cost and Project Resources
and Approach
35%
QA/QC Plan
10%
Total 100%
IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LP
Airia Austin
Rating
Score
5
1.25
5 0.75
5 1 0.75
2
0.70
5
0.50
3.95
Airia Austin
Rating Score
5
1.25
5
0.75
5
0.75
1
0.00
5
0.50
3.25
Corion
Rating
DeLeine
Score
4
1.00
4
0.60
5
0.75
3
1.05
3
0.30
3.70
Gregory
Rating
Gay
Score
4
1.00
4
0.60
4
0.60
3
1.05
4
0.40
3.65
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Corion
Rating
DeLaine
Score
4
1.00
5
0.75
5 1
0.75
4 1.40
4 0.40
4.30
Gregory
Rating
Gay
Score
4
1.00
5
0.75
4
0.60
3
1.05
4
0.40
3.80
Gerald
Rating
Lee
Score
2
0.50
3
0.45
4
0.60
3
1.05
4
0.40
3.00
Gerald
Rating
Lee
Score
4
1.00
4
0.60
3
0.45
3
1.05
4
0.40
3.50
EVALUATION MATRIX
RFP No. 22-0912200
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
S&ME, Inc.
Reviewer Name:
Weight
Technical Approach,
Management, and Project
Understanding
25%
Qualifications of Key Personnel
15%
Past Performance/Similar
Experience
15%
Cost and Project Resources i
and Approach
35%
QA/QC Plan
10%
Total
100%
Reviewer:
Airia Austin
Corion DeLeine
Gregory Gay
Gerald Lee
AVERAGE RATING
Airia Austin
Rating
Score
1 1 0.25
2 0.30
2 0.30
0 0.00
2 0.20
1.05
Corion
Rating
DeLaine
Score
3
0.75
3 0.45
2
0.30
3
1.05
2 0.20
2.75
FIRM SELECTED
Gregory Gay
Rating ! Score
3 1 0.75
3 0.45
3
0.45
1
0.35
3
0.30
2.30
IMS Infrastructure KCI Technologies, S&ME, Inc.
Management Inc.
3.95 3.25 1.05
3.70 4.30 2.75
3.65 3.80 2.30
3.00 3.50 2.00
3.58 3.71 2.03
Gerald
Rating
Lee
Score
2
0.50
3
0.45
1
0.15
2
i
0.70
I--
2 0.20
1 2.00
EVALUATION FORM
RFP No. 22-0912200
Pavement, Sidewalk, and additional city assets condition assessment
By signing this form as an Evaluator, I certify that I have no conflict of interest.
Reviewer Name:
Signature:
Firm Name:
Rd.. k & g 1W Date: 1 Z^ LL• Lo 7,`1
Evaluation Notes:
Criterion
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
,
Qualifications of Key Personnel
t.
Past Performance/Similar Experience
ii—
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Past Performance/Similar Experience
ec—
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
.--'
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
,
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Z
Past Performance/Similar Experience
Z
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
2
Notes:
Xi2 coIV�9 PRoi/VISr. , easg
cD 144-c- Ra cJ: v:j 1 NCR
P cis cos PRa ((.2:Zs?'z
1 7z s j o P42 ..f) G s.S tJ g-cG
5746,4 a') AN, 7-14/\---2r5 Zr)
e9a/svaii cyo A/zl -7 rI4Lt0 am,J
Agam% �� S.c' c9 Po RA 7:4‹, J
II? 2;5- -zee,
Notes:
EVALUATION FORM
RFP No. 22-0912200
Pavement, Sidewalk, and additional city assets condition assessment
By signing this form as an Evaluator, I certify that I have no conflict of interest.
Reviewer Name:
Signature:
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
e6t/kwt
Zt1s 44 slit/Ohm- 44 /+��sotcw � 5(44,<-44-,
t: �
Notes:
Ratin
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
/ j
�-l/
Qualifications of Key Personnel
f Cf
t
Past Performance/Similar Experience
S
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
fig J
QA/QC Plan
/3
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Ratin
Date:
/Z/z ze
;5 le:ws4
'ier 'r44„ 4,IO (,,s 1LC,
Notes:
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
/
UI
Qualifications of Key Personnel
S
Past Performance/Similar Experience
S
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
1.1
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Ratin
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Past Performance/Similar Experience
/L
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
Agikbige_S of i P .ERs �� �R�i �,� i
Mr 1T -L&(._
Notes: 1
A tiNL:GA' Q at<1C,6M CciC __e (alg_os p it/oh,,
:A 6iofr/r/e& 1N//r/1 r-ypeit
EVALUATION FORM
RFP No. 22-0912200
Pavement, Sidewalk, and additional city assets condition assessment
By signing this form as an Evaluator, I certify that I have no conflict of interest.
Reviewer Name:
Signature:
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Date: 12 (22 `Zo22
I / .A4por irittr . i1, u411 cI ieo-j, t t7
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
<GVI
Qualifications of Key Personnel
A
Past Performance/Similar Experience
A
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
1
QA/QC Plan 4
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Notes:
tre Nft, 4 c;
riLa? 6I' •ep /1 1
C4-11,4444G4A6,0-1-1 "gyp r~(l al. G-! - G-er 74,- -t
b( rs
6./V6,1_ `-us4t-LDLoG. c s
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
v
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Past Performance/Similar Experience
4
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
.$0 1"
Notes:
A41.4_l l"P-011P-c7- 1-417) 41CPAS -i
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Notes:
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
v
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Past Performance/Similar Experience
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
JJ
G
QA/QC Plan
'`4t/- 4,4-L.S GEA,\I r rtidG-GL 464tH t Gt t -c) ,6o 4G-irt,
u i�c 011,1V411
EVALUATION FORM
RFP No. 22-0912200
Pavement, Sidewalk, and additional city assets condition assessment
By signing this form as an Evaluator, I certify that I have no conflict of interest.
Reviewer Name:
Signature:
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
'�
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Past Performance/Similar Experience
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
3
QA/QC Plan
t
Date:
1Iva .J-. n t ?,1-u9 'CC Aktec ei- OA A ALA, C W-Q.-t Pis
Ratin
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
Lir
Qualifications of Key Personnel
tt
Past Performance/Similar Experience
n
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
QA/QC Plan
I
KC,
Ratin
Firm Name:
Evaluation
Criterion
Ratin
Technical Approach, Management,
and Project Understanding
Qualifications of Key Personnel
3
Past Performance/Similar Experience
1
Cost and Project Resources and
Approach
s�
Q%
QA/QC Plan
a,
Notes:
l�124
(Lc(-1.&totrso 161 , 1N_G,
Notes:
304'}Z a,4 ittU.�
t:fi q L.set Sou W, -t C. ` c, , .Q '\ 2t o 2
Notes:
(` c
AGREEMENT FOR PAVEMENT. SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT, dated this day of 2023, between:
THE CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, a Florida municipal corporation,
hereinafter "CITY"
and
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
a Florida Corporation, hereinafter "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
In consideration of the mutual terms and conditions, promises, covenants, and
payments hereinafter set forth, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
PREAMBLE
In order to establish the background, context and form of reference for this Agreement and to
generally express the objectives, and intentions, of the respective parties herein, the following
statements, representations and explanations shall be accepted as predicates for the
undertakings and commitments included within the provisions which follow and may be relied
upon by the parties as essential elements of the mutual considerations upon which this Agreement
is based.
1.1 CITY is in need of a CONTRACTOR to provide the services for a project titled,
Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City Assets Condition Assessment.
1.2 CITY finds it necessary to seek a professional, full -service company to provide Pavement,
Sidewalk Assessment services.
1.3 CITY issued RFP 22-0912200 ("RFP"), seeking a professional company with the knowledge
and ability to perform the services sought.
1.3 At its meeting of January 11, 2023, CITY selected CONTRACTOR to perform services needed
that will provide professional full services of a Pavement and Sidewalk Assessment company.
1.4 Contractor's firm will be responsible for Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City Assets
Condition Assessment services rendered pursuant to RFP No. 22-0912200.
ARTICLE 2 SCOPE
OF WORK
2.1 CONTRACTOR shall furnish all of the materials, tools, supplies, and labor necessary to
perform all of the work described in the Request for Proposals RFP 22-0912200, a copy of which
is attached hereto and specifically made a part of this Agreement as Exhibit "A", Scope of
Services.
2.2 CONTRACTOR shall abide by all specifications outlined in RFP 22-0912200.
2.3 CONTRACTOR hereby represents to CITY, with full knowledge that CITY is relying upon
these representations when entering into this Agreement with CONTRACTOR, and that
CONTRACTOR has the professional expertise, experience and manpower to perform the services to
be provided by CONTRACTOR as set forth in CONTRACTOR's response to RFP.
2.3 CONTRACTOR assumes professional and technical responsibility for performance of its
services to be provided hereunder in accordance with applicable recognized professional
standards and relevant Florida Statutes.
ARTICLE 3
COMMENCEMENT OF SERVICES
3.1 The CONTRACTOR shall commence work as directed by CITY upon the effective date this
Agreement is executed by both parties.
ARTICLE 4
CONTRACT SUM
The CITY hereby agrees to pay CONTRACTOR for the faithful performance of this Agreement, for work
completed in accordance with this Agreement and RFP 22-0912200. The payment for services
pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed One hundred Ninety -Nine Thousand Three Hundred
Ninety -Two Dollars and Zero Cents ($199,392.00).
4.1 CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for and shall provide for the payment of
workers compensation insurance coverage and premium, and all other insurance pursuant to
Article 5 below, withholding taxes, FICA, pension and profit-sharing contributions, retirement
contributions, if any, all remunerations; all labor contract compliance, and all other charges, fees,
permits and expenses associated with the employment of such personnel provided by
CONTRACTOR hereunder. CITY shall bear no responsibility for any such charge, fees, permits or
expenses associated with the employment of such personnel by CONTRACTOR.
4.2 Payment to CONTRACTOR for all tasks and charges under this Agreement shall be based
on the following conditions:
A. Disbursements. There are no reimbursable expenses associated with this
Agreement.
B. Payment Schedule. Invoices received from CONTRACTOR pursuant to this
Agreement will be reviewed by the appropriate financial staff. If services havebeen
rendered in conformity with the Agreement, the invoice will be sent to theCity of
Opa-locka's Finance Department for payment and may need to be subsequently
approved by the State of Florida.
C. Availability of Funds. CITY's performance and obligation to pay under this
Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation from the CITY.
D. Final Invoice. In order for both parties herein to close their books and records,the
CONTRACTOR will clearly state "final invoice" on the CONTRACTOR's final bill to
the CITY.
4.3 The making and acceptance of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claimsby
the CITY. It shall also constitute a waiver of all claims by the CONTRACTOR, except those
previously made and still unsettled.
ARTICLE 5
CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE
5.1 The CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this contract until it has obtained
all insurance required under this paragraph and such insurance has been approved by the CITY
nor shall the CONTRACTOR allow any Subcontractor to commence work on his sub -contract until all
similar such insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained and approved.
5.2 Certificates of insurance, reflecting evidence of the required insurance, shall be filed with the
CITY prior to the commencement of the work. These Certificates shall contain a provision that
coverage afforded under these policies will not be canceled until at least thirty days (30) prior written
notice has been given to the CITY. Policies shall be issued by companies authorized to do business
under the laws of the State of Florida.
5.3 Financial Ratings must be no less than "A" in the latest edition of "Bests Key Rating
Guide", published by A.M. Best Guide.
5.4 Insurance shall be in force until all work required to be performed under the terms ofthe
Contract is satisfactorily completed as evidenced by the formal acceptance by the CITY.In the
event the insurance certificate provided indicates that the insurance shall terminate and lapse
during the period of this contract, then in that event, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish, at least
thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the date of such insurance, a renewed certificate of
insurance as proof that equal and like coverage for the balance of the period ofthe contract and
extension thereunder is in effect. The CONTRACTOR shall not continue to work pursuant to this
contract unless all required insurance remains in full force and effect.
5.5 Comprehensive General Liability insurance to cover bodily injury liability and property
damage liability with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrences.
Exposures to be covered are:
• Premises and Operation
• Products/Completed Operations
• Broad Form Property Damages
• Broad Form Contractual Coverage applicable to this specific Agreement,
including any hold harmless and/or indemnification agreement.
• Personal Injury Coverage with Employee and Contractual Exclusions removed,with
minim limits of coverage equal to those required for Bodily Injury Liability and
Property Damage Liability.
Business Automobile Liability with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00)
per occurrence combined single limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage
Liability. Coverage must be afforded on a form no more restrictive than the latest edition of
the Business Automobile Liability policy, without restrictive endorsements, and must
include:
• Owned vehicles
• Hired and Non -Owned Vehicles
• Employers' Non -Ownership.
5.6 The CONTRACTOR shall hold the CITY, the City of Opa-locka their agents, and
employees, harmless on account of claims for damages to persons, property or premisesarising
out of the operations to complete this Agreement and name the CITY as an additionalinsured
under their policy.
5.7 The CITY reserves the right to require any other insurance coverage it deems
necessary depending upon the exposures.
ARTICLE 6
PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
6.1 At all times during the performance of this Contract, the CONTRACTOR shall protect the
CITY's property and properties adjoining the Project site from all damage whatsoever onaccount
of the work being carried on pursuant to this Agreement.
ARTICLE 7
CONTRACTOR'S INDEMNIFICATION
7.1 The CONTRACTOR agrees to release the CITY from and against any and all liability and
responsibility in connection with the above -mentioned matters. The CONTRACTOR further
agrees not to sue or seek any money or damages from CITY in connection with the above -
mentioned matters, except in the event that the CITY fails to pay to CONTRACTOR thefees and
costs as provided for in Article 4 herein.
7.2 The CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, its trustees, elected
and appointed officers, agents, servants and employees, from and against any and all claims,
demands, or causes of action of whatsoever kind or nature, and the resulting losses, costs,
expenses, reasonable attorneys' fees, liabilities, damages, orders, judgments, or decrees,sustained
by the CITY or any third party arising out of, or by reason of, or resulting from the
CONTRACTOR's negligent acts, errors, or omissions.
7.3 If a court of competent jurisdiction holds the CITY liable for certain tortious acts of its
agents, officers, or employees, such liability shall be limited to the extent and limit provided in
768.28, Florida Statutes. This provision shall not be construed as a waiver of any right or defense
that the CITY may possess. The CITY specifically reserves all rights as against any and all claims
that may be brought.
ARTICLE 8
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
8.1 This Agreement does not create an employee/employer relationship between the parties. It
is the intent of the parties that the CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor under this
Agreement and not the CITY's employee for all purposes, including but not limited to, the
application of the Fair Labor Standards Act minimum wage and overtime payments, Federal
Insurance Contribution Act, the Social Security Act, the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the State Workers Compensation Act, and the State
unemployment insurance law. The CONTRACTOR shall retain sole and absolute discretion in the
judgment of the manner and means of carrying out the CONTRACTOR's activities and
responsibilities hereunder provided. This Agreement shall not be construed as creating any joint
employment relationship between the CONTRACTOR and the CITY and the CITY will not be
liable for any obligation incurred by CONTRACTOR, including but not limited to unpaid
minimum wages and/or overtime premiums.
ARTICLE 9
CHANGES TO SCOPE OF WORK AND ADDITIONAL WORK
9.1 CITY or CONTRACTOR may request changes that would increase, decrease or otherwise
modify the Scope of Services/Basic Services to be provided under this Agreementas described in
Article 2 of this Agreement. Such changes or additional services must be in accordance with a
written amendment, executed by the parties hereto, with the same formality and with equality
and dignity prior to any deviation from the terms of this Agreement, including the initiation of
any additional or extra work. Each amendment shall at a minimum include the following
information on each project:
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
ESTIMATED COST FOR ADDITION OR CHANGE TO PROJECT CONTRACT
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE
9.2 In no event will the CONTRACTOR be compensated for any work which has not been
described in a separate written agreement executed by the parties hereto.
ARTICLE 10
TERM AND TERMINATION
10.1 This Agreement shall commence upon execution of this Agreement and is anticipated to
be one fiscal year.
10.2 This Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause, or the CITY for
convenience, upon thirty (30) days written notice by the CITY to CONTRACTOR in which event
the CONTRACTOR shall be paid its compensation for services performed to termination date. In
the event that the CONTRACTOR abandons this Agreement or causes itto be terminated, he shall
indemnify the CITY against any loss pertaining to this terminationup to a maximum of the full
contracted fee amount. All finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, plans, surveys, and
reports prepared by CONTRACTOR shall become the property of CITY and shall be delivered by
CONTRACTOR to CITY.
ARTICLE 11
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
11.1 CONTRACTOR and CITY hereby agree that the following Specification and Contract Documents,
which are attached hereto and made a part thereof, are fully incorporated herein and made a part of
this Agreement, as if written herein word for word: this Agreement; RFP 22-0912200, Exhibit "A",
and the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
ARTICLE 12
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1 Legal Representation. It is acknowledged that each party to this Agreement had the
opportunity to be represented by counsel in the preparation of this Agreement and, accordingly,
the rule that a contract shall be interpreted strictly against the party preparingsame shall not
apply due to the joint contribution of both parties.
12.2 Assignments. This Agreement, or any interest herein, shall not be assigned, transferred, or
otherwise encumbered, under any circumstances, by CONTRACTOR withoutthe prior written
consent of CITY. For purposes of this Agreement, any change of ownershipof CONTRACTOR shall
constitute an assignment which requires CITY approval. However, this Agreement shall run to the
CITY and its successors and assigns.
12.3 Records. CONTRACTOR shall keep books and records and require any and all subcontractors to
keep books and records as may be necessary in order to record complete and correct entries as to
personnel hours charged to this engagement, and any expenses for which CONTRACTOR expects to
be reimbursed, if applicable.
Such books and records shall be available at all reasonable times for examination and audit by CITY
and shall be kept for aperiod of three (3) years after the completion of all work to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement. Incomplete or incorrect entries in such books and records will be
grounds for disallowance by CITY of any fees or expenses based upon such entries.
CITY is a public agency subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. To the extentCONTRACTOR is
acting on behalf of CITY pursuant to Section 119.0701, Florida Statutes, CONTRACTOR shall:
a. Keep and maintain public records that ordinarily and necessarily would be required
to be kept and maintained by CITY were CITY performing the services under this
agreement;
b. Provide the public with access to such public records on the same terms and
conditions that the County would provide the records and at a cost that does not exceed
that provided in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, or as otherwise provided by law;
c. Ensure that public records that are exempt or that are confidential and exempt from
public record requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law; and
d. Meet all requirements for retaining public records and transfer to CITY, at no cost,all
public records in possession of the CONTRACTOR upon termination of this Agreement
and destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidentialand exempt. All
records stored electronically must be provided to the CITY.
e.IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CH. 119, F..S,
TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS AT: (305) 953-2860; 780
Fisherman Street, Opa-Locka, FL 33054; jflores@opalockafl.gov.
12.4 Ownership of Documents. Reports, surveys, plans, studies and other data provided in
connection with this Agreement are and shall remain the property of CITY.
12.5 No Contingent Fees. CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not employed or retained any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONTRACTOR, to
solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to payany person, company,
corporation, individual or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for
CONTRACTOR, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For the breach or violation of this
provision, the CITY shall have the right to terminate the Agreement without liability at its
discretion, to deduct from the contract price, or otherwiserecover the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, gift or consideration.
12.6 Notice. Whenever any party desires to give notice unto any other party, it must be given
by written notice, sent by registered United States mail or national delivery service withverified
confirmation. If by mail, with return receipt requested, addressed to the party for whom it is
intended and the remaining party, at the places last specified, and the places for giving of notice
shall remain such until they shall have been changed by written notice in compliance with the
provisions of this section. For the present, the CONTRACTOR and the CITY designate the
following as the respective places for giving of notice:
CITY:
Copy To:
Contractor:
Darvin Williams, Interim City Manager
City of Opa-locka Municipal Complex
780 Fisherman Street, 4TH Floor
Opa-locka, FL 33054
Burnadette Norris -Weeks, City Attorney
Burnadette Norris -Weeks, P.A.
401 North Avenue of the Arts
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33311
Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
12.7 Binding Authority. Each person signing this Agreement on behalf of either party
individually warrants that he or she has full legal power to execute this Agreement on behalfof the
party for whom he or she is signing, and to bind and obligate such party with respect to all
provisions contained in this Agreement.
12.8 Exhibits. Each Exhibit referred to in this Agreement forms an essential part of this
Agreement. The exhibits if not physically attached should be treated as part of this Agreement
and are incorporated herein by reference.
12.9 Headings. Headings herein are for convenience of reference only and shall not be
considered on any interpretation of this Agreement.
12.10 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or application thereof to any person or
situation shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement,
and the application of such provisions to persons or situations other than those asto which it shall
have been held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and shall continue in full
force and effect, and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
12.11 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Floridawith
venue lying in Miami -Dade County, Florida.
12.12 Disputes. Any claim, objection, or dispute arising out of the terms of this Agreementshall
be litigated in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court in and for Miami -Dade County.
12.13 Attorney's Fees. To the extent authorized by law, in the event that either party brings suit for
enforcement of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorney's fees and court
costs in addition to any other remedy afforded by law.
12.14 Extent of Agreement. This Agreement together with Contract Documents, attached as an
Exhibit hereto, as amended herein above represents the entire and integrated agreement between
the CITY and the CONTRACTOR and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or
agreements, either written or oral.
12.15 Waiver. Failure of the CITY to insist upon strict performance of any provision or
condition of this Agreement, or to execute any right therein contained, shall not be construedas a
waiver or relinquishment for the future of any such provision, condition, or right, but thesame
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, the parties have set their hands and seals the dayand
year first written above.
City of Opa-locka
ATTEST:
BY:
Joanna Flores Darvin Williams
City Clerk Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Burnadette Norris -Weeks, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
WITNESSES:
BY:
Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
Vice President
ATTEST:
SECRETARY
STATE OF FLORIDA )
) SS:
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE)
BEFORE ME, an officer duly authorized by law to administer oaths and take
acknowledgments, personally appeared as , of
a Florida corporation, and acknowledged executed the foregoing Agreement as the proper
official of , for the use and purposes mentioned in it and affixed the official seal ofthe
corporation, and that the instrument is the act and deed of that corporation.
IN WITNESS OF THE FOREGOING, I have set my hand and official seal at inthe State
and County aforesaid on this day of , 2023.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires:
EXHIBIT "A"
RFP 22-0912200 ("RFP"),
City of Opa-locka
RFP NO: 22-0912200
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
RFP NO. 22-0912200
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL
CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subject Page Number
Cover 1
Table of Contents 2
Advertisement 3
Part I - Proposal Guidelines 4
Part II - Nature of Services Required 8
Part III - Proposal Requirements 10
Part IV - Evaluation of Proposals 12
Proposer Qualifications 14
Price Proposal 15
Debarment, Suspension Certification 16
Drug -Free Certification 18
Non -Collusion Affidavit 19
Non -Discrimination Affidavit 20
E -Verify Form 21
CITY OF OPA—LOCKA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
RFP NO: 22-0912200
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Sealed Proposals for the PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT will
be received by the City of Opa-locka at the Office of the City Clerk, 780 Fisherman St, 4th Floor, Opa-locka,
Florida 33054, Monday, September 12, 2022 by 2:00 p.m. Any RFP Package received after the designated
closing time will be returned unopened. The City of Opa-locka will be accepting proposals by mail, however it
is your responsibility to submit your proposal by the due date. In addition, proposals may be submitted via
www.demandstar.com (e -bid). The address to submit sealed proposals is listed below:
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
Office of the City Clerk
780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor
Opa-locka, Florida 33054
An original and six (6) copies for a total of seven (7) plus 1 copy of the Proposal package on USB Flash Drive
in PDF format shall be submitted in sealed envelopes/packages addressed to the City Clerk, City of Opa-locka,
Florida, and marked RFP for PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT.
Proposers desiring information for use in preparing proposals may obtain a set of such documents by visiting
the City's website at www.opalockafl.gov or www.demandstar.com.
The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals and to waive any technicalities or
irregularities therein. The City further reserves the right to award a contract to that proposer whose proposal
best complies with the RFP NO: 22-0912200 requirements. Proposers may not withdraw their proposal for a
period of ninety (90) days from the date set for the opening thereof.
A pre -bid meeting will be held on Tuesday, August 30, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. at 780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor
(Human Resources Conference Room), Opa-locka, FL 33054 and via zoom.
To participate via Zoom, please use the call -in information listed below:
https://us02web.zoom.us/i/89759172312?pwd=dzB3WHdwd1JZMndXWU1TUIM2WnVSZz09
Meeting ID: 897 5917 2312
Passcode: 071880
One tap mobile
+13017158592„89759172312#,,,,*071880# US (Washington DC)
+13126266799„89759172312#,,,,*071880# US (Chicago)
Dial by your location
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
Joanna Flores, CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
RFP NO. 22-0912200
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
PART I
PROPOSAL GUIDELINES
Introduction: The City of Opa-locka is requesting proposals from qualified professional companies
to provide PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
services for the City.
1-2. Proposal Submission and Withdrawal: The City of Opa-locka will be accepting proposals
by mail, however it is your responsibility to submit your proposal by the due date. In addition,
proposals may be submitted via www.demandstar.com (e -bid). The City must receive all proposals
by 2:00 pm on Monday, September 12, 2022. The address to submit sealed proposals is listed below:
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
Office of the City Clerk
780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor
Opa-locka, Florida 33054
To facilitate processing, please clearly mark the outside of the proposal package as follows: RFP NO.
22-0912200 - PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT.
This package shall also include the Proposer's return address.
Proposers may withdraw their proposals by notifying the City in writing at any time prior to the
deadline for proposal submittal. After the deadline, the proposal will constitute an irrevocable offer,
for a period of 90 days. Once opened, proposals become a record of the CITY and will not be returned
to the Proposer.
The City cautions proposers to assure actual delivery of mailed or hand -delivered proposals directly
to the City Clerk's Office at 780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor, Opa-locka, Florida 33054 prior to the
deadline set for receiving proposals. Telephone confirmation of timely receipt of the proposal may
be made by calling (305) 688-4611 before proposal closing time. Any proposal received after the
established deadline will not be considered and will be returned unopened to the Proposer(s).
1-3. Number of Copies: Proposers shall submit an original and six (6) copies (a total of 7)
plus one copy on CD in PDF format of the proposal in a sealed, opaque package marked as noted
above. The Proposer will be responsible for timely delivery, whether by personal delivery, US Mail
or any other delivery medium.
1-4. Development Costs: Neither the City nor its representatives shall be liable for any expenses
incurred in connection with preparation of a response to this Request for Proposal. Proposers
should prepare their proposals simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise
description of the Proposer's ability to meet the requirements of the RFP.
1-5. Inquiries: The City Clerk will receive written requests for clarification concerning the
meaning or interpretations of the RFP, until eight (8) days prior to the submittal date. City personnel
are authorized only to direct the attention of prospective Proposers to various portions of the RFP
so that they may read and interpret such for themselves. No employee of the City is authorized to
interpret any portion of this RFP or give information as to the requirements of the RFP in addition
to what is contained in the written RFP document.
1-6. Addendum: The City may record its response to inquiries and any supplemental
instructions in the form of written addenda. The CITY may mail written addenda up to three (3)
calendar days before the date fixed for receiving the proposals. Proposers shall contact the City to
ascertain whether any addenda have been issued. Failure to do so could result in an unresponsive
proposal. Any oral explanation given before the RFP opening will not be binding.
All Proposers are expected to carefully examine the proposal documents. Any ambiguities or
inconsistencies should be brought to the attention of the City's Purchasing Agent through written
communication prior to the opening of the proposals.
1-7. Contract Awards: The City anticipates entering into an Agreement with the Proposer who
submits the proposal judged by the City to be most advantageous.
The Proposer understands that this RFP does not constitute an offer or an Agreement with the
Proposer. An offer or Agreement shall not be deemed to exist and is not binding until proposals are
reviewed, accepted by appointed staff.
The City reserves the right to reject all proposals, to abandon the project and/or to solicit and re -
advertise for other proposals.
1-8. Contractual Agreement: This RFP and Consultant/Contractor proposal shall be included
and incorporated in the final award. The order of contractual precedence will be the Contract or
Agreement document, original Terms and Conditions, and Proposer response. Any and all legal
action necessary to enforce the award will be held in Miami -Dade County and the contractual
obligations will be interpreted according to the laws of Florida. Any additional contract or
agreement requested for consideration by the Proposer must be attached and enclosed as
part of the proposal.
1-9. Selection Process: The proposals will be evaluated and assigned points. The firm with the
highest number of points will be ranked first; however, nothing herein will prevent the City from
assigning work to any firm deemed responsive and responsible.
The City reserves the right to further negotiate any proposal, including price, with the highest rated
Proposer. If an agreement cannot be reached with the highest rated Proposer, the City reserves the
right to negotiate and recommend award to the next highest Proposer or subsequent Proposers
until an agreement is reached.
1-10. Public Records: Upon award recommendation or ten (10) days after opening, whichever
occurs first, proposals become "public records" and shall be subject to public disclosure consistent
with Chapter 119 Florida Statutes. Proposers must invoke the exemptions to disclosure provided
by law in the response to the RFP, and must identify the data or other materials to be protected, and
must state the reasons why such exclusion from public disclosure is necessary. Document files may
be examined, during normal working hours.
1-11. News Releases: The Proposer shall obtain the prior approval of the City Manager's Office of
all news releases or other publicity pertaining to this RFP or the service, study or project to which
it relates.
1-12. Insurance: The awarded Proposer(s) shall maintain insurance coverage reflecting at least
the minimum amounts and conditions specified herein. In the event the Proposer is a governmental
entity or a self -insured organization, different insurance requirements may apply.
Misrepresentation of any material fact, whether intentional or not, regarding the Proposers'
insurance coverage, policies or capabilities may be grounds for rejection of the proposal and
rescission of any ensuing Agreement.
1. Evidence of General Liability coverage with limits not less than $1,000,000 per
Occurrence/ $2,000,000 Aggregate (Including Policy Number and Policy Period);
2. Evidence of Auto Liability coverage with limits not less than $1,000,000 per
Occurrence/$1,000,000 Aggregate (Including Policy Number and Policy Period);
3. Evidence of Workers' Compensation coverage with statutory limits and Employer's
Liability coverage with limits not less than $100,000 (Including Policy Number and Policy
Period);
4.The City listed as an additional insured (this may be specifically limited to the specific
job(s) the contractor will be performing);
5. Minimum 30 -day written notice of cancellation.
1-13. Licenses: Proposers, both corporate and individual, must be fully licensed and certified in
the State of Florida at the time of RFP submittal. The proposal of any Proposer who is not fully
licensed and certified shall be rejected.
1-14. Public Entity Crimes: Award will not be made to any person or affiliate identified on the
Department of Management Services' "Convicted Vendor List". This list is defined as consisting of persons
and affiliates who are disqualified from public contracting and purchasing process because they have been
found guilty of a public entity crime. No public entity shall award any contract to, or transact any business
in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017 Florida Statutes for Category Two
(currently $25,000) with any person or affiliated on the "Convicted Vendor List" for a period of thirty-six
(36) months from the date that person or affiliate was placed on the "Convicted Vendor List" unless that
person or affiliate has been removed from the list. By signing and submitting the RFP proposal forms,
Proposer attests that they have not been placed on the "Convicted Vendor List".
1-15. Code Of Ethics: If any Proposer violates or is a party to a violation of the code of ethics of the City
of Opa-locka or the State of Florida with respect to this proposal, such Proposer may be disqualified from
performing the work described in this proposal or from furnishing the goods or services for which the
proposal is submitted and shall be further disqualified from submitting any future proposals for work,
goods or services for the City of Opa-locka.
1-16. Drug -Free Workplace: Preference shall be given to businesses with Drug -Free Work Place (DFW)
programs. Whenever two or more proposals which are equal with respect to price, quality, and service
are received by the City for the procurement of commodities or contractual services, a proposal received
from a business that completes the attached DFW form certifying that it is a DFW shall be given preference
in the award process.
1-17. Permits and Taxes: The Proposer shall procure all permits, pay all charges, fees, and taxes, and
give all notices necessary and incidental to the due and lawful prosecution of the work.
1-18. Protests: Protests of the plans, specifications, and other requirements of the request for proposal
and bids must be received in writing by the City Clerk's Office at least ten (10) working days prior to the
scheduled bid opening. A detailed explanation of the reason for the protest must be included. Protests
of the award or intended award of the bid or contract must be in writing and received in the City Clerk's
Office within seven (7) working days of the notice of award. A detailed explanation of the protest must
be included.
1-19. Termination for Convenience: A contract may be terminated in whole or in part by the City at any time and
for any reason in accordance with this clause whenever the City shall determine that such termination is in the best
interest of the City. Any such termination shall be affected by the delivery to the contractor at least five (5) working
days before the effective date of a Notice of Termination specifying the extent to which performance shall be
terminated and the date upon which termination becomes effective. An equitable adjustment in the contract price
shall be made for the completed service, but no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed
services.
PART 11
MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS
2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
2.1 The intent of this Request for Proposal is to provide proposals from qualified right-of-way asset data
collection consultants focusing primarily on Sidewalk and Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to provide
professional services to prepare a Pavement and Sidewalk Management Program (PMP) Additional
Assets listed below. Proposers must have sufficient expertise and experience to complete the work
described in the Scope of Services and to conduct a condition survey of the City's roadway network
and provide technical support for creating the City's Pavement Management System (PMS). The
information gathered will be integrated into the City's existing Geographic Information System (GIS)
layers.
The City reserves the right to amend the terms of this "Request for Proposal" (RFP), to circulate various
addenda, or to withdraw the RFP at any time, regardless of how much time and effort consultants have
spent on their responses.
2.2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS:
2.2.1 The City of Opa-locka has approximately 95 lane miles +/- of roadway. Approximately 80
percent of the road network is local streets. Pavement and sidewalk sections are measured
from intersection to intersection in the City's network. This project will update every road
section's Pavement Condition Index and other identified assets within the city. Please refer
to Attachment A for a map that illustrates the roads within the City's Road network.
2.3 REQUIRED ELEMENTS
2.3.1 Physically evaluate the pavement condition of all City streets and determine a Pavement
Condition Index (PCI) rating for each street section, pursuant to applicable standards.
2.3.2 Physically evaluate the condition of all City sidewalks to measure sidewalk defects, such as
Uplifts, Bumps, Holes, Cracking & Surface Texture.
2.3.3 Compliance with ADA Sidewalk Width
2.3.4 Compliance with ADA Ramps, measuring the following attributes:
ramp slope & cross slope, road slope & cross slope, flare slopes, ramp width, landing area, tactile
pad (present/not present/condition).
2.3.5 Curb GIS Database contractor will determine curb locations, from front or side facing
imagery.
2.4 PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY
2.4.1 All arterial and collector roadways shall be tested and driven in each direction, resulting in two
full passes. The City maintains approximately 95 lane miles +/- of roadway.
2.4.2 Vendor shall not survey private property beyond the City's Right of Way (ROW)
2.4.3 Provide pavement surface type (asphalt, concrete, brick)
2.4.4 Provide if pavement markings are on the street.
2.4.5 Provide surface imaging and/or video of the network that can be integrated into the
approved Pavement Management Software and provided to the City.
2.5 INPUT AND ANALYSIS:
2.5.1 Generate a report consisting of an executive summary of the current City street inventory with
associated data such as street limits, length, width, type of paving, classification, area of street,
segment PCI and zone. The report shall also contain the total number of streets, the prior work
history performed, identification of newly added Branches and Sections, projections of
pavement quality based on different scenarios and a maintenance program for a 5 -year
program beginning in FY 2022-2023.
2.5.2 Generate predictions for scenarios listed below, based on information provided by the City
over a 5 -year period and provide repair strategy recommendations based on the actual
budget. Consultant shall also prepare results for each scenario listed below. Annual budgets
will be provided by the City to the successful Consultant.
a) Scenario 1— Budget required to maintain PCI from report.
b) Scenario 2 — Budget required to achieve a 70 PCI.
c) Scenario 3 — PCI change with current funding.
d) Scenario 4 — PCI change with an additional $200,000 of funding per year.
e) Scenario 5 — PCI change by resurfacing the lowest 5 PCI streets per year.
The report shall identify a sample of a City Street within each range of PCI's, with a photo of the street, and
provide a summary/description of the existing condition of the street and a resurfacing strategy.
The report shall contain a map that shows the current zones PCI and a map that shows the zone PCI's at the end of
the 5 -year program based on the current budget to show the result of the 5 -year program. A list in narrative form
shall also be within the report to identify the result of the 5 -year program.
The City will provide estimated street repair costs for slurry seals, cape seals, overlays and reconstruction based on
recent bids. This shall be used by the Consultant for estimating street resurfacing costs for each street, as specified
above.
2.6 Additional Asset Collection
2.6.1 Paving Markings
A visual review of the markings which shall determine the current condition and whether maintenance is
required.
Attributes Description
Category* Left Turn, Right Turn, Crosswalk etc.
Location* Global Positioning System (GPS) location (+1- 2 meters)
Condition The analysis will be conducted from intersection to intersection and
given a rating of either Good, Fair or Critical. If the length of the road is
longer than 1,000 ft, the analysis will be broken up into 1,000 ft
segments.
2.6.2 Traffic Signage
Assessment and location of traffic signs; with the following attributes:
Attributes
Sign Category*
Sign Name*
GPS Location*
Sign &
Condition
Post
Description
Regulatory, Warning, Guide, School, Recreation, Information,
General
Federal or State MUTCD designation or custom designation for
specialized signs
Global Positioning System (GPS) location (+/- 2 meters)
Good, Fair, Critical rating assessed through review of daytime
digital images
2.6.3 Stormwater, and Water/Sewer Infrastructure
Catch basins, Manholes, Fire Hydrants, Sewer and Water Valves
Attributes Description
GPS Location Global Positioning System (GPS) location (+/- 2 meter)
2.6.4 Trees
A visual review of the trees which shall determine the current condition and whether maintenance or
replacement is required.
Attributes
GPS Location
Condition
2.6.5 Streetlights
Description
Global Positioning System (GPS) location (+/- 2 meter)
A visual evaluation of the tree to ensure that it is safe for the
environment and the property around them
A list of the streetlights that include type, size, condition, light quality, pole number, and street location,
and a map of the city's streetlight
Attributes Description
GPS Location Global Positioning System (GPS) location (+1- 2 meter)
Verification of lights, type, and size Sodium Vapor (HPS), Mercury Vapor, LED,
Pole number and Size
Working condition of lights
Light quality:
Broken sensors, running continuously, intermittent lighting,
broken parts, decreased brightness due to dirt and bugs in the
fixture, etc.
Lumens, Visibility, Obstruction
In Addition, the proposer shall include:
• Identify and implement a preferred Pavement Management System (such as Street Saver or PAVER).
• Identify feasible rehabilitation alternatives for each street section.
Prepare a 10 -year plan for street rehabilitation based on the City's anticipated revenues.
• Identify feasible rehabilitation alternatives for each additional asset assessed.
Prepare a 5 -year plan for sidewalk, signage, streetlights, paving markings, trees rehabilitation or
replacement based on the City's anticipated revenues
2.7 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE:
The vendor is to provide a two (2) year user license of the Pavement Management Software that meets the City's
goals. The software shall be compatible with ArcGIS and shall be able to transfer data with no extra software. The
software shall be able to incorporate data and any other ratings from other sources. The software should be
available both on desktop versions and mobile applications or web versions.
The software shall be able to provide:
a.) Minimum of 5 years of resurfacing projections
b.) Resurfacing and Preventative Maintenance breakdown based on the City's budget
c.) Preventative maintenance breakdown, i.e. crack seal, cut and patch, asphalt rejuvenation
d.) A map of the City's network PDF reports with budget and paving information for Administration and City
Commission to view.
Training of the approved software shall be provided to designated staff and be included in the cost of the software.
Training can either be in person or via Microsoft Teams or another application that is available for the City to use.
A training manual shall also be provided.
PART III
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
3-1 RULES FOR PROPOSALS
In order to maintain comparability and enhance the review process, proposals shall be organized in
the manner specified below and include all information required herein. The proposal must name
all persons or entities interested in the proposal as principals. The proposal must declare that it is
made without collusion with any other person or entity submitting a proposal pursuant to this RFP.
3-2 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
The proposal shall be submitted on 8 Y2 "x 11" paper, portrait orientation, with headings and
sections numbered appropriately. Ensure that all information is written legibly or typed. The
following should be submitted for a proposing firm to be considered:
3.2.1 Cover Page - Show the name of Proposer's agency/firm, address, telephone number, name of contact
person, date, and the proposal number and description.
3.2.2 Tab 1 - Table of Contents
Include a clear identification of the material by section and by page number.
3.2.3 Tab 2 - Letter of Transmittal
3.2.3.1 Limit to one or two pages.
3.2.3.2 Briefly state the Proposers understanding of the work to be done and make a positive
commitment to perform the work.
3.2.3.3 Give the names of the persons who will be authorized to make representations for the
Proposer, their titles, addresses and telephone numbers.
3.2.3.4 Provide an official signature of a Corporate Officer certifying the contents of the Proposer's
responses to the City's Request for Proposal.
3.2.4 Tab 3 - General Information
3.2.4.1 Name of Business.
3.2.4.2 Mailing Address and Phone Number.
3.2.4.3 Names and contact information of persons to be contacted for information or services if
different from name of person in charge.
3.2.4.4 Normal business hours.
3.2.4.5 State if business is local, national, or international and indicate the business legal status
(corporation, partnership, etc.).
3.2.4.6 Give the date business was organized and/or incorporated, and where.
3.2.4.7 Give the location of the office from which the work is to be done and the number of
professional staff employees at that office.
3.2.4.8 Indicate whether the business is a parent or subsidiary in a group of firms/agencies. If it is,
please state the name of the parent company.
3.2.4.9 State if the business is licensed, permitted and/or certified to do business in the State of
Florida and attach copies of all such licenses issued to the business entity.
3.2.5 Tab 4 - Project Approach
Describe in detail your proposal to fulfill the requirements of the scope of services listed in section 2.2 of this
RFP.
3.2.6 Tab 5 - Experience and Qualifications
3.2.6.1 Specify the number of years the Proposer has been in business.
3.2.6.2 Identify the Proposer's qualifications to perform the services identified in this RFP as listed in
section 2-2 of the Scope of Services.
Include resumes, not exceeding one page each, of all key personnel who will be assigned to the City.
3.2.7 Tab 6 - Schedule
3.2.7.1 Include a timetable that identifies the amount of time required to complete each component
of the Program.
3.2.7.2 Indicate the earliest available start date for your project team.
3.2.7.3 Indicate the project completion date based on the date provided in 3.2.7.1.
3.2.8 Tab 7 - Pricing of Services
3.2.8.1 Fee basis should be an all-inclusive, base fee.
3.2.9 Tab 8 - References
3.2.9.1 List a minimum of three (3) references in Florida for which the proposer has provided
elevator services. Include the name of the organization, brief description of the project, name of
contact person telephone number and email address.
3.2.10 Tab 9 - Additional Forms
Proposers must compete and submit as part of its Proposal all of the following forms and/or
documents
• Proposer Qualifications
• Certification regarding debarment and suspension
• Drug Free workplace certification
FAILURE TO SUBMIT ALL OF THE ABOVE REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION MAY DISQUALIFY PROPOSER.
PART IV
EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
4-1 SELECTION COMMITTEE
A Selection Committee, consisting of City personnel, will convene, review and discuss all proposals
submitted.
The Selection Committee will use a point formula during the review process to score proposals and
assign points in the evaluation process in accordance with the evaluation criteria. The Proposer
shall satisfy and explicitly respond to all the requirements of the RFP including a detailed
explanation of how the services shall be performed.
Each proposal will be reviewed to determine if the Proposal is responsive to the submission
requirements outlines in the Solicitation. A responsive Proposal is one which follows the
requirements of this Solicitation that includes all documents are submitted in the format outlined
in this Solicitation, is of timely submission, and has the appropriate signatures as required on each
document. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the Proposal being deemed non-
responsive. The Contract (s) will be awarded to the most responsive proposer whose Proposal best
serves the interest of and represents the best values to the City of Opa-locka.
4-2 EVALUATION CRITERIA
The Committee may select and choose to invite any and/or or all firms to make a presentation and
be interviewed by the Committee as part of the evaluation process for this Solicitation. The
Committee's decision will be communicated by staff to all Respondents. The Respondent's
presentation may clarify but may not modify their submitted proposal. Any discussion between the
presenter (s) and Evaluation Committee during presentations are intended only for purposes of
providing clarification in response to questions from the Committee.
Category
Points
Technical Approach, Management, and Project Understanding
Firm's understanding of the project requirements and providing a sound technical and
managerial approach to achieving the project's purpose.
25
Qualifications of Key Personnel - Identify and list qualifications of key personnel, team members and
sub -consultants proposed to work on this project and their responsibilities with this project. The firm's
key personnel should demonstrate experience with similar projects in urban settings within the past 5
years.
15
Past Performance/Similar Experience
The firm's prior similar experience, including the work which best illustrates the team's most relevant
experience, ability, and expertise to perform the services requested in this RFP, and the firm's past
performance on similar projects, ongoing and completed within the past 5 years, including references.
15
Cost and Project Resources and Approach
Appropriateness, reasonableness, and competitiveness of the cost proposal. (10 points)
Resources and approach
1. Adequate resources
2. Proposed plan and approach to fulfilling scope
35
QA/QC Plan
10
TOTAL
100
4-3 ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Proposers may be required to make individual presentations to the City Selection Committee in
order to clarify their proposals. Only those firms with the highest rated scores in accordance with
the stated criteria and their weights will be invited to give oral presentations. However, the City
has the right to accept the best proposal as submitted, without discussion or negotiation.
If the City determines that such presentations are needed, a time and place will be scheduled for
oral presentations. Each Proposer shall be prepared to discuss and substantiate any of the areas of
the proposal submitted, and its qualifications to perform the specified services. During the oral
presentations, the Proposers should relate their discussion to the evaluation criteria, which will
include (but not be limited to) their approach to the project. The proposed Project Manager must
be in attendance.
The Evaluation Criteria may be changed for the oral presentation evaluation phase. References and
site visits (if completed) shall be included in the final evaluation criteria, along with other criteria
and weights as determined by the Selection Committee. Finalists will be informed as to the revised
criteria, if any, prior to their oral presentation.
Additionally, prior to award of an Agreement pursuant to this RFP, the City may require Proposers
to submit such additional information bearing upon the Proposer's ability to perform the services
in the Agreement as the City deems appropriate.
4-4 FINAL SELECTION
The City of Opa-locka will select the firm that meets the best interests of the City. The City shall be
the sole judge of its own best interests, the proposals, and the resulting negotiated agreement. The
City's decisions will be final. Following the notification of the selected firm, it is expected that an
Agreement will be executed between both parties. City staff will recommend award to the
responsible Proposer whose Proposal is determined to provide overall best value to the City,
considering the evaluation factors in this RFP.
4-5 AWARD AND CONTRACT EXECUTION
After review by the Selection Committee of the proposals and oral presentations a recommendation
will be made to the City Manager for submission to the City Commission for final approval. Upon
Commission authorization, contract negotiations will be initiated with the first ranked firm. If those
negotiations are unsuccessful, the City will formally terminate negotiations with the first ranked
firm and will commence contract negotiations with the next ranked firm, etc. Upon successful
contract negotiations with the prevailing firm, the remaining firms will be notified that the process
has been completed and that they were not selected.
RFP NO. 22-0912200
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
The Proposer, as a result of this proposal, MUST hold a County and/or Municipal Contractor's Occupational
License in the area of their fixed business location. The following information MUST be completed and
submitted with the proposal to be considered:
1. Legal Name and Address:
Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip: Phone/Fax:
2. Check One: Corporation () Partnership () Individual ( )
3. If Corporation, state:
Date of Incorporation: State in which Incorporated:
4. If an out-of-state Corporation, currently authorized to do business in Florida, give date of
such authorization:
5. Name and Title of Principal Officers Date Elected:
6. The length of time in business: years
7. The length of time (continuous) in business as a service organization in Florida:
years
8. Provide a list of at least three commercial or government references that the bidder has
supplied service/commodities meeting the requirements of the City of Opa-locka
specification, during the last twenty-four months.
9. A copy of County and/or Municipal Occupational License(s)
Note: Information requested herein and submitted by the proposers will be analyzed by the City of Opa-locka and will be a factor considered in awarding
any resulting contract. The purpose is to insure that the Contractors, in the sole opinion of the City of Opa-locka, can sufficiently and efficiently perform
all the required services in a timely and satisfactory manner as will be required by the subject contract. If there are any terms and/or conditions that are
in conflict, the most stringent requirement shall apply.
RFP NO: 22-0912200
PRICE PROPOSAL FORM
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Firms must use the Cost Proposal below to submit your Firm's cost for this project indicated in the Scope of Service
herein.
The City reserves the right to increase, decrease, and/or choose the items and quantities below for the Project to
meet its available budget using the hourly rates provided below.
Proposing firm must completely fill out each row below.
Your firm must provide a detailed fee schedule that explains the cost and services for each description of task.
LUMP SUM PRICE: $
SUBMITTED THIS
BID SUBMITTED BY:
DAY OF 2022.
Company Telephone Number
Name of Person Authorized to Submit Bid
Signature
Title
Fax Number
Email Address
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION
PROPOSED DEBARMENT AND OTHER MATTERS OF
RESPONSIBILITY
1. The Proposer certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that the Proposer and/or any of its
Principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the
award of contracts by any Federal agency.
B. Have not, within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract;
violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements,
tax evasion, or receiving stolen property; and
C. Are not presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph 1-B of this provision.
2. The Proposer has not, within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts
terminated for default by any City, State or Federal agency.
A. "Principals," for the purposes of this certification, means officers; directors; owners; partners; and,
persons having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g.,
general manager; plant manager; head of a subsidiary, division, or business segment, and similar
positions). This Certification Concerns a Matter Within the jurisdiction of an Agency of the United
States and the Making of a False, Fictitious, or Fraudulent Certification May Render the Maker Subject
to Prosecution Under Section 1001, Title 18, United States Code.
B. The Proposer shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior
to contract award, the Proposer learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has
become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
C. A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily
result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be
considered in connection with a determination of the Proposer's responsibility. Failure of the
Proposer to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the
Contracting Officer may render the Proposer non -responsive.
D. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of
records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision.
The knowledge and information of a Proposer is not required to exceed that which is normally
possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
E. The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Proposer knowingly
rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the
Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.
AS THE PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE STATEMENT, I CERTIFY THAT THIS FIRM COMPLIES FULLY
WITH THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.
Signature
Printed Name
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
RFP NO. 22-0912200
DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION FORM
Whenever two (2) or more bids/proposals, which are equal with respect to price, quality, and
service, are received by the CITY OF OPA-LOCKA for the procurement of commodities or contractual
services, a bid/proposal received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug -free
workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. In order to have a drug -free
workplace program, a business shall:
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession or use of controlled substances is prohibited in the workplace and
specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug -free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for
drug abuse violations.
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are
under bid a copy of the statement specified in number (1).
4. In the statement specified in number (1), notify the employees that as a condition for
working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will
abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction on or plea
of guilty or no contest to any violation of Chapter 893, Florida Statutes or of any controlled
substance law of the United States or any singular state, for a violation occurring in the
workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction.
5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community by any employee
who is so convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through
implementation of Section 287.087, Florida Statutes.
This Certification is submitted by the
(Name)
of
(Title/Position) (Company)
who does hereby certify that said Company has implemented a drug -free workplace program, which
meets the requirements of Section 287.087, Florida Statutes, which are identified in numbers (1)
through (6) above.
Date Signature
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA - COUNTY OF MIAMI DADE
being first duly sworn, deposes and says that:
(1) He/She/They is/are the
(Owner, Partner, Officer, Representative or Agent) of
the PROPONENT that has submitted the attached
proposal;
(2) He/She/They is/are fully informed respecting the preparation and contents of the attached Proposal and
of all pertinent circumstances respecting such Proposal;
(3) Such Proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham Proposal;
(4) Neither the said PROPONENT nor any of its officers, partners, owners, agents, representatives,
employees or parties in interest, including this affiant, have in any way colluded, conspired, connived
or agreed, directly or indirectly, with any other PROPONENT, firm, or person to submit a collusive or
sham Proposal in connection with the Work for which the attached Proposal has been submitted; or to
refrain from Proposing in connection with such Work; or have in any manner, directly or indirectly,
sought by agreement or collusion, or communication, or conference with any PROPONENT, firm, or
person to fix any overhead, profit, or cost elements of the Proposal or of any other PROPONENT, or to
fix any overhead, profit, or cost elements of the Proposed Price or the Proposed Price of any other
PROPONENT, or to secure through any collusion, conspiracy, connivance, or unlawful agreement any
advantage against (Recipient), or any person interested in the proposed Work;
(5) The price or prices quoted in the attached Proposal are fair and proper and are not tainted by any
collusion, conspiracy, connivance, or unlawful agreement on the part of the PROPONENT or any other
of its agents, representatives, owners, employees or parties of interest, including this affiant.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of:
By:
Witness Signature
Witness Print Name and Title
NON-DISCRIMINATION AFFIDAVIT
I, the undersigned, hereby duly sworn, depose and say that the organization, business or entity
represented herein shall not discriminate against any person in its operations, activities or delivery of
services under any agreement it enters into with the City of Opa-locka. The same shall affirmatively comply
with all applicable provisions of federal, state and local equal employment laws and shall not engage in or
commit any discriminatory practice against any person based on race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual
orientation, national origin, marital status, physical or mental disability, political affiliation or any other
factor which cannot be lawfully used as a basis for service delivery.
By:
Title:
Sworn and subscribed before this
day of , 20
Notary Public, State of Florida
(Printed Name)
My commission expires:
E -VERIFY
Effective January 1, 2021, public and private employers, contractors and subcontractors will be
required to register with, and use of the E -verify system in order to verify the work authorization
status of all newly hired employees. Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees to
utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System to verify the employment
eligibility of:
a) All persons employed by Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform employment duties within
Florida during the term of the contract; and
b) All persons (including sub-vendors/sub-contractors) assigned by Vendor /Consultant/
Contractor to perform work pursuant to the contract with the Department. The Vendor
/Consultant/ Contractor acknowledges and agrees that use of the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security's E -Verify System during the term of the contract is a condition of the contract with the
City; and
By entering into a Contract, the Contractor becomes obligated to comply with the provisions of Section
448.095, Fla. Stat., "Employment Eligibility," as amended from time to time. This includes but is not limited
to utilization of the E -Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees, and
requiring all subcontractors to provide an affidavit attesting that the subcontractor does not employ,
contract with, or subcontract with, an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall maintain a copy of such
affidavit for the duration of the contract. Failure to comply will lead to termination of this Contract, or if a
subcontractor knowingly violates the statute, the subcontract must be terminated immediately. If t contract
is terminated for a violation of the statute by the Contractor, the Contractor may not be awarded a public
contract for a period of 1 year after the date of termination. The Contractor acknowledges it is liable to the
City for any additional costs as a result of termination of the contract due to Contractor's failure to comply
with the provisions herein.
E -VERIFY FORM
Definitions:
"Contractor" means a person or entity that has entered or is attempting to enter into a contract with
a public employer to provide labor, supplies, or services to such employer in exchange for salary,
wages, or other remuneration.
"Subcontractor" means a person or entity that provides labor, supplies, or services to or for a
contractor or another subcontractor in exchange for salary, wages, or other remuneration.
Effective January 1, 2021, public and private employers, contractors and subcontractors will begin
required registration with, and use of the E -verify system in order to verify the work authorization
status of all newly hired employees. Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees to
utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System to verify the employment
eligibility of:
a) All persons employed by Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform employment duties
within Florida during the term of the contract; and
b) All persons (including sub-vendors/subcompanies/subcontractors) assigned by
Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform work pursuant to the contract with the
Department. The Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees that use of the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System during the term of the contract is a
condition of the contract with the City of Opa-locka; and
Should vendor become successful Contractor awarded for the above -named project, by entering into
this Contract, the Contractor becomes obligated to comply with the provisions of Section 448.095,
Fla. Stat., "Employment Eligibility," as amended from time to time. This includes but is not limited to
utilization of the E -Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees,
and requiring all subcontractors to provide an affidavit attesting that the subcontractor does not
employ, contract with, or subcontract with, an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall maintain a
copy of such affidavit for the duration of the contract. Failure to comply will lead to termination of
this Contract, or if a subcontractor knowingly violates the statute, the subcontract must be
terminated immediately. If this contract is terminated for a violation of the statute by the Contractor,
the Contractor may not be awarded a public contract for a period of 1 year after the date of
termination.
Company Name:
Authorized Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
Date:
o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.2.2 TAB 1- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
3.2.3 TAB 2 - LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 2
3.2.4 TAB 3 - GENERAL INFORMATION 4
3.2.5 TAB 4 - PROJE=CT APPROACH g
3.2.6 TAB 5 - EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS 24
3.2.7 TAB B - SCHEDULE 37
3.2.8 TAB 7 - PRICING OF SERVICES 39
3,2,9 TAB B - REFERENCES 40
3.2.10 TAB 9 - AUDI TIONAL FORMS 47
AVE.NIENT Ev,!ALK. AMU A.i)Ul i frNA1. C. AS EFS E_ N Ill;' N 4S;ES';irl(=N f 1
/ d
3�
/ {
par
(
KCI
150 9001:2015 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION 'MANAGERS
1425 W Cypress Creek Road. Suite 101 • Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 • Phone 954-776-1616
September 19, 2022
City of 0pa-Locka
Office of the City Clerk
780 Fisherman Street, 4th Floor
Opa-Locka, Florida 33054
Re: Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City Assets Condition Assessment
RFQ No. 22-0912200
Dear Members of the Selection Committee:
KCI Technologies, Inc. (KCI) understands that the City of Opa-Locka is looking for a firm to provide
qualified right-of-way asset data collection focusing primarily on sidewalk and pavement condition
index (PCI) as well as provide professional services to prepare a pavement and sidewalk
management program (PMP).
With more than 66 years of significant experience providing professional engineering and
assessment services for a variety of clients like the City of Opa-Locka, KCI has the necessary
resources, expertise, and experience to manage and execute this contract for the City and we are
pleased to submit this proposal for your consideration.
The success of any project, in particular a project of this magnitude and complexity, depends on
the qualifications and experience of the consultant team. KCI, along with our teaming partner Data
Transfer Solutions, LLC (DTS), offers an extensive portfolio of previous pavement data collection
and assessments to help cities plan for future maintenance and asset management initiatives.
Our team is uniquely qualified to perform the work described because:
• We provide digital PCI rating representing the condition of 100% of the driven lanes, not
based on a sample. We also deliver an accurate estimation of repair needs.
• Our automated digital survey vehicle with Allied Vision Prosilica GX1920C GigE, frame rate
of 15 images per second and 1936 x 1456 color resolution provides an efficient and
effective collection and detection process.
• We will utilize a downward -facing, progressive line scan camera that provides high -
resolution images (1mm pixel, 4,000 pixels wide, and -12 feet width) of the pavement
surface to clearly detect and quantify distresses.
• Team members possess specialized education and experience in pavement engineering
and understand the pavement distress mechanism and repair strategy to maximize
pavement performance at a minimal cost.
P E41ENT Si1DE`,;AI_K, AND 1D[)ITli NA! (IT/ A Hj— T S COi'iDITION •>;S 'SS vIEN
rnmEmmntI rmen
Tz2E gam
KCI
ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101 • Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 • Phone 954-776-1616
• We offer a full -service Asset Management practice with expertise in pavement
management software - PAVER, StreetSaver, Cartegraph OMS, CMMS software, and
GIS/web dashboard capabilities.
• We have a proven team dynamic that is professional and pleasant. We will maintain a
collaborative team throughout the project and foster collaboration and open discussion
with the City.
• We present the results of the pavement condition assessment, repair analysis, and
budget scenarios to the City Council Board members, and help justify the budget needs.
Contact authorized to make representation for KCI: Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
Title: Vice President
Address: 1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Phone: (410)527-4415
On behalf of the entire KCI team, we appreciate the opportunity to submit our qualifications to the
City of Opa-Locka for this Pavement, Sidewalk, and Additional City Assets Condition Assessment.
KCI declares that our submission to the City of Opa-Locka was made without collusion with any
other person or entity submitting a proposal pursuant to this RFP. The below -proposed signature
of our officer Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL certifies the content of our responses to the City's
Request for Proposal.
Respectfully,
Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
Bruce Reed, RLA
Vice President Regional Practice Leader
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, ;AND ADD111ONAL CITY .ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
ERA
0
.et AT
1
KCE TEC:Hi';iil OWES.
3.2.4 TAB 3 - GENERAL INFORMATION
H�.'.alfaYsae....-..,_-+.—.Cg}}�y1g�yY.e.�vz-cr�64fl.E�4R6'ID'Id"1�1.1d':ICtI"¢a'�+T.Effi3ffii.3i-8� ffi4'QtESf�ifF..f.iF�d5EtII3t.+A�S+141GG[I;iT.1PJT.1TilS�YE :'i�: SR�S.�.�.:u.33QT S�_44t�.i2i9
3.2.4.1 Name of Business KCI Technologies, Inc.
3.2.4.2 Mailing Address and Phone
Number
3.2.4.3 Names and contact information of
persons to be contacted for information
or services if different from name of
person in charge
3.2.4.4 Normal business hours
3.2.4.5 State if business is local, national,
or international and indicate the business
legal status (corporation, partnership,
etc.)
3.2.4.6 Give the date business was
organized and/or incorporated, and
where
3.2.4.7 Give the location of the office
from which the work is to be done and the
number of professional staff employees
at that office
3.2.4.8 Indicate whether the business is a
parent or subsidiary in a group of
firms/agencies. If it is, please state the
name of the parent company
3.2.4.9 State if the business is licensed,
permitted and/or certified to do business
in the State of Florida and attach copies
of all such licenses issued to the business
entity.
1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101, Fort
Lauderdale, FL 33309
(954)776-1616
Shahidul Islam, PhD, PE
shahidul.islam@kci.com
(410) 472-5937
8:00am - 5:00pm
KCI is a national company with seven offices
throughout Florida.
Legal Status: Corporation
1955, incorporated in the state of Delaware
1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101, Fort
Lauderdale, FL 33309
Number of professional staff: 51
KCI Technologies, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of
KCI Holdings, Inc.
KCI is a 100% employee -owned, sub -chapter S
corporation.
KCI is licensed to do business in the state of Florida,
No. P23975
A copy of the license is provided on the following page.
PAs'E DEN i `,IUr4';AI K. No ='DD HoN,Nt. C!T'l
,S[i> CONDiT C)N ASSESSMENT
CI LCiiH E. i;IL INL.
State of Florida
Department of State
I certify from the records of this office that KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is a
Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida,
qualified on April 19, 1989.
The document number of this corporation is P23975.
I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through
December 31, 2022, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report
was filed on April 28, 2022, and that its status is active.
I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal.
Given undermy hand and the
Great Seal oldie State of Florida
at Tallahassee, the Capikzl, this
the Twenty-third day ofAugus4
2022
Tracking Number: 3664772690 CU
To authenticate this certiicate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then
follow the instructionsdisplayed.
https://services.sunbiz.a rg/Filiogs/Certificate OfStatus/Ce rtificateAuthentication
r' 1'.'I SIDEWALK. AND ADDITIONAL CITY Ass COiNol-noN ASS` S5' :=N
%
4 \r
KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC.
3.2.5 TAB 4 - PROJECT APPROACH
itiVECRAYEMPIMIP
Describe in detail your proposal to fulfill the requirements of the scope of services listed in
section 2.2 of this RFP.
KCI understands that the City of Opa-Locka is interested in performing right-of-way asset data
collection of approximately 95 lane miles of roadway, focusing primarily on Sidewalk and Pavement
Condition Index(PCI) to prepare a Pavement and Sidewalk Management Program (PMP)that will
result in the greatest return on investment. KCI will perform an automated pavement assessment
based on the ASTM D6433 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys methodology, to determine the
PCI value for each pavement section. For sidewalk and ramp condition assessment and ADA
compliance evaluation, our trained and experienced engineers will perform a "boots -on -the -
ground" survey and walk with a tablet application, using a custom survey form integrated with
ArcGIS. KCI will develop GIS-integrated asset inventory and condition assessment for additional
right-of-way assets. KCI will generate predictions for scenarios assuming different pavement
conditions/budget scenarios. KCI will establish appropriate rehabilitation and preventative
maintenance strategies and costs, including appropriate treatments such as slurry seals, cape
seals, overlays, and reconstruction based on recent bids. In a 5 -year forward program, KCI will
provide estimated costs for the recommended maintenance and rehabilitation activities and a
map that shows the current zones PCI and a map that shows the zone PCI's at the end of the 5 -year
program based on the current budget to show the result of the 5 -year program. The report will also
contain condition analysis, different levels of investments, and recommendations on pavement
preservation. The Work Plan section which follows details how KCI would meet the City's needs in
carrying out the project. A diagram of our proposed approach is depicted below:
Project Kick-off Meeting
• Project management
• Project schedule
• Deliverables
• Available data from the City
• Specific requirements by the City
Report, Presentation, &
Training
• Final report and presentation
• Presentation to the City Officials
• Training to the City staff
M&R Strategies and 5 -Year
Program
• Generate prediction scenarios
• Pavement maintenance rehabilitation
• Budget optimization
• Develop 5 -year pavement management
program (PMP)
Pavement, Sidewalk, & ADA
Ramps Field Data Collection
• Automated pavement imagery and
distress data collection
• Sidewalk field data collection
• ADA ramps field data collection
• Field data collection for additional
assets
Pavement, Sidewalk, ADA
Ramps Condition Rating
• Process pavement Inspection data
• Determine Pavement Condition Index
(PCI) for each pavement section
• Verification of PCI values
• QC/CA of sidewalk and ADA ramps
data
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
OBJECTIVES TO BE ACCOMPLISHED
The objective is to provide inventory and condition assessment of approximately 95 lane miles of
streets, about 35 miles of sidewalk and ADA ramps, and additional right-of-way asset data
collection. To accomplish that goal, we will complete the following tasks:
• Provide asset inventory and condition assessment of select City -owned street, sidewalk,
ADA ramps, and additional right-of-way assets.
• Assign experts in pavement engineer to review and analyze the pavement data and
generate pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategies, costs, and develop
predictions for scenarios based on budget and PCI values.
• Develop a 5 -year sidewalk and pavement management program (PMP) for the City.
• Provide PAVER/StreetSaver training and support to the City staff so that the City staff can
perform the analyses for future needs.
Item 1: Kick -Off Meeting and Records Review
KCI understands the importance of planning and preparation at the onset of a project. KCI will
coordinate with the City for a project kick-off meeting to briefly discuss the following items:
O 4 Project management
• Project schedule
I I : GIS shapefile of the City's network
Y Network segmentation
Available data in the City's GIS database for PMS implementation
• Deliverables
As a local firm with offices in Fort Lauderdale and Miami, KCI can meet in person with City
staff for the kick-off meeting. However, if the City prefers, KCI will arrange a virtual kick-off
meeting for project introductions and high-level planning. The meeting will be scheduled
before data collection. Before the kick-off meeting, KCI will provide a questionnaire to the
City to gather information for data collection and PMS implementation.
KCI believes communication is the key to a successful project. In addition to the kick-off
meeting, KCI anticipates regular correspondence with the City throughout the project to
meet the City's specific needs.
ITEM 2: PAVEMENT DATA COLLECTION
KCI will partner with Data Transfer Solutions, LLC(DTS) to collect pavement data utilizing one
of their Digital Survey Vehicles (DSV). KCI will utilize the LCMS-equipped DSVs to collect geo-
located imagery for the City. KCI proposes to use DTS's Mobile Asset Collection (MAC) vehicle
line scan camera with laser illumination and three forward facing right-of-way cameras and
one rear facing camera to capture right-of-way images to be used during the pavement
rating process.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, TINE.
KCI plans to collect images in a single direction
in the outermost lane for undivided local roads
and collect images in both directions in the
outermost lane for all arterial and collector
roadways. DTS's LCMS equipment is shown in
Figure 1 on the following page. Specific
information that can be collected with DTS's LCMS-equipped DSV includes:
• High -resolution right-of-way digital cameras - Allied Vision Prosilica GX1920C GigE,
images collected at every 15 to 20 feet based on client's requirements, and 1936 x 1456
color resolution.
DTS has rigorously tested equipment that is
independently certified by the Texas A&M
Transportation Institute (TTI) and
International Cybernetics Corporation (ICC).
LRIS pavement imaging system - collects high -definition pavement images used to
extract distress type, severity, and extent measurements. 4096 pixel/line, 28,000
Tines/sec, lmm resolution.
Applanix P0S220V inertial measuring unit (IMU)- centimeter -level positioning of MAC van
during collection.
DMI equipment - distance measuring instrument used for system integration.
GPS equipment - used for mapping level positioning of the vehicle, heading
information, and positional tagging of images. Two positional units, one differential
unit.
Servers - onboard servers for storing data, processing images, storing profiler, GPS, DMI,
and IMU data.
Surface (road) profiler - used for precise pavement's International Roughness
Index(IRI), transverse profile (rut) measurement.
Jointed plain concrete pavement's faulting data.
Vehicle with LCMS
Lasers
Distress/Crack Detection
Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS)
Figure 1: LCMS equipped pavement data collection vehicle.
ITEM 3: SIDEWALK CONDITION DATA COLLECTION
KCI has developed a customizable tablet application for sidewalk condition assessment and
standard condition rating system representing a Sidewalk Condition Index(SCI)aligned with MAP -
21 guidance standards. SCI is a direct indicator of a sidewalk's physical conditions on a scale of 0 to
100, 0 representing the failed sidewalk and 100 representing the new sidewalk. It is the sum of
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CIry ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
distress severities for a sidewalk
weighted by the size of each distress.
SCI will incorporate the distress based
on the visual assessment of the
sidewalks, including, but not limited to:
■ Cross slope
■ Uplifts
■ Roughness/spalling
■ Bumps/Vertical fault
■ Cracking
Surface Texture
Horizontal fault
Obstructions
Holes
Along with the physical condition
assessment, ADA compliance can also be
determined. A compliance score for
sidewalks on a scale from 0 to 100 can be
developed to address ADA compliance. A
score of 100 represents full compliance
with the proposed Public Right -of -Way
Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), the
standards adopted by ADA) considers four
criteria representing PROWAG
accessibility standards:
■ Cross slope
■ Vertical fault size
■ Obstructions
■ Sidewalk width
KCI's customizable tablet application provides the
capability to capture ADA ramp inventory, condition, and compliance data. The ADA curb ramp
compliance considers 13 criteria based on PROWAG standards, including slopes, dimensions, and
detectable warning surface properties. The criteria cover six areas of analysis:
Location of Sidewalk and ADA Ramps
5idexalk Aatefvnenl
Sidewalk and ADA Ramps Inspection App
PAvErviENr, SIDEWALK. AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI UECI-INLILOWLS I111L.
Figure 2. An example of sidewalk condition assessment integrated with GIS.
• Ramp geometry
o Width
o Cross slope
o Running slope
• Detectable warning surface
o Surface Type
o Width
• Gutter
o Cross slope
o Counter slope
• Landing
o Dimension and slope
• Approaches and flares
o Approach slope
o Flare slope
• Hazards
o Vertical faults and obstructions
Left Approach
Landing
Ramp
Detectable
Warning Surface
Right Approach
A schematic of ADA ramp components.
ITEM 4: PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY AND PC1 CALCULATION
With the pavement image collection started, DTS will begin processing pavement images. This
allows DTS to begin the pavement distress rating process concurrent with the image collection.
uuttcr
PAVEMENT, SIDEVVALK. AND ADDITIONAL CIT( ASSETS CONG'!TIOii �1�iFSii.I T
KC.I 1 I- Llli',Ii1L0GIL-S.
Once pavement images and distress mapping processing are completed for each collection day,
experienced pavement evaluators will review each street segment's images for a complete and
thorough evaluation of the existing pavement condition per the ASTM 06433 pavement distress
rating process including the following distresses: alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking,
transverse cracking, raveling, flushing, and patching. The EarthShaperTM software allows distress
vectors to be viewed and edited through this workflow. DTS has designed the EarthShaper asset
data extraction software by optimizing the performance of visualization/QC of the roadway
condition and inventory data. The distress data file will be loaded to PAVER/StreetSaver to
calculate PCI values for each pavement section. Each pavement section will be rated based on the
PCI scale of 0 to 100.
PKI L.pK.
IN 7D i 4. .__. OispI.vtN.flrvrlion
._j lT
Pulm SIi<
Figure 3: A sample image illustrating pavement distress type. severity. and quantity survey process.
IRI (International Roughness Index) will be collected using profiler equipment that meets ASTM
standards. DTS utilizes a surface profiling system manufactured by International Cybernetics
Corporation (ICC) for evaluating the smoothness of pavement.
We will also determine if pavement markings are on the street. The collected surface imaging
and/or video of the network will be processed to integrate into the approved Pavement
Management Software and provided to the City.
PAS/EAENT, SIDFW I I< , AND DDITIONiAL or( „SE ES C )N-omoN ASSESSMENT
KC' ! =.CHNI0i_`);i I i .
ITEM 5: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM/SOFTWARE SELECTION
The selection of pavement management software is influenced by the requirements of the City and
user's needs. The software provides a platform to store pavement
management information and to perform different types of One of the key personnel provided
analyses. Depending on the needs, the City can also opt to use a ' PAVER and StreetSaver training to
combination of pavement management software and a 25+ cities, villages, and counties.
customized GIS dashboard to suit its requirements. Table 1 shows
the comparison of PAVER and StreetSaver features and capabilities. We plan to demonstrate the
capabilities of both of these software to the City staff during the interview/kickoff meeting so that
the City would be able to choose the best option depending on their needs.
Table 1. Comparison of PAVER and SreetSaver features.
Description
PAVER
StreetSaver
Vendor
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers
Metropolitan Transportation
Commission
Tablet, Laptop, and Web Version
Desktop and Tablet
version, can also be used
for manual data collection
Desktop and Web, but additional
programs needed for manual data
collection
Minimum of 5 years of resurfacing
projections
Yes
Yes
Resurfacing and Preventative
Maintenance breakdown
Yes
Yes
Preventative maintenance
breakdown
Yes
Yes
A map of the City's network PDF
reports with budget and paving
information
Yes
Yes
Ability to Analyze Other Assets
Yes, curb and gutter
Yes, sidewalk, streetlights, sign, curb
and gutter, ADA ramp compliance
Default Pavement Condition
Rating
PCI, IRI
PCI, IRI
Analyze Budget Scenarios
Yes
Yes
ArcGIS Integration
Yes
Yes
Cost
$999 (one time purchase)
$1,500/year, an additional $500 per
non -pavement asset
A'y fs;M NF, SIDE`;VALK. AND A)D'rioNAL CI S'/ ASSEF`i CONDFIIi i AS t;,rAENl
KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC.
ter...,,.::,-,
M14.1 t.A•Isyroam4a e�
1
Sum.,.nrm.nl;uPo,.m
-v' axon ..r an
V1410111 111
9,r,Pw. (D., 1•••151.
.1ral+p.u1C..I.nf1N.
r�
Figure 4: A sample image of PAVER features.
0.1 IOpPoe:a my
i . . .._ _ . .... . ...
57. 9/751.5
:;JI Stfrer9 Tice
❑ Eryineerir2 Grade 7T07011
❑ HO Inlua0-ITyp n0
❑ Priama1c T50a 00
Piielra5c (TTPe D0
0 PriamaSc(T)Te`,110
PnsmaIc (0yP. lq
0,41 Er;irenm9 Grev.1
L7 Urkrw.anlr.'c)
�Serd:rl0al.
Feavrts Scent& Tleetmen0
lia...11.101t de .. na
"o.Nror sa,....k..r.....
a .uR... en..wlw
&mks 5.9 1.11U.105/ BUDGET - ;Y4' 7(J1 7 !L ' I;. 65. A
' 7041 I.0a
' ' r.IJ J[. lr__�.., litir� ' ii 1' '(I Llri17_::ii.L ❑,_
:1 20:5.: Mlfi S,o,. Cda OVee110 7..5710 P.e,ec0'eoW P(ITrealel EnLacfll . Erclnca4o, RN0le�re P llcmtat fie6Pc r1 Ercpcirl IleeC 771 50a61a a luea 7CC.1
2017 7 si:'O'J 0Kr', 0105 1015 KO 1010ELLUDUE 0 IiWO CT M:gK1•1.1110 DOWN OSCCO 0 W 25 Wart T.•1171D 2 R Residua el
.2016 105004 0170 0016 ICO @I0 6-/14901'/,' JOSHUA CT JOSHUA 0 M 0(C(; 15. 1004410 CT• 1- 2 R ResiCM5a1
! 2019 1- '��:,�f:'�l I07CHC - 0100 2016 _ 160 820 00401 L600Ifi .LK(HC 06660 0.7010 20 IWICEICI, r 2 R pa510 .4
ffra RUHR0 0174 2016 170 0110 1050 ':•17 00 M100E000 P7117R0 0CC0 0CC00 25 PRIMROSE CT 2 PReHteoel
4 Ma 611FIRE 0100 2017 170 CITYUM,1 170547.100 CR 0/FIRE 111170_ 1/45100 000(777 0C%C4 1 EMFIP.E MIME. 2 00.11!x.6.1
., n_a 01,0171 0270 2017 100 0000(1 0070014075 MARK 0901110 1.0.ICOD 007(O 07000 75 1400777:74144 D 2 0R.itu0el
,/. tc 'j1 'WIT,/ 07:4 2017 100 FOP.TDU, C7 E60ETT0l'Ir M Kr,,,,770 11.17KP.) 0 W 0[CCO 27 FORK TWAY, 6 2 11 Pe l ieUrael„
1�5eciu.720 -:7 441111 C10
1= figure 5: A sample image of StreetSaver features.
ITEM 5: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION/BUDGET SCENARIO ANALYSIS
The pavement management optimization and budget scenario analysis start with developing
pavement performance models, pavement treatment matrix, treatment selection decision
trees, annual maintenance and rehabilitation budget, and other analysis variables.
PAVEP*1 NT, SIDEWALK. •AN i) ,yDDIT!ONln\L CITY 6'ASSE IS CONDITION ASSES SY'L NII
KC i;_-CHNOLCGIF_:. INC
Development of Pavement Performance Models
After determining PCI values in PAVER/StreetSaver based on the latest condition inspection, KCI
will develop pavement performance models to predict the future conditions of pavement. The
pavement prediction modeling process identifies, and groups pavements of similar construction
subjected to similar traffic patterns, weather, and other factors that affect pavement life. The
historical data on pavement conditions can be used to build a model which can accurately predict
the future performance of a group of pavements with similar attributes.
KCI will coordinate with the City to develop the models based on the traffic, surface type, section
ranks, weather, and use. Figure 6 on the following page shows an example of a pavement
performance model and critical PCI for that model.
100 x g
90
l 80
Q.
• 70
= • 60
0
'+'..50
-o
co 40
• 30
01
} 20
m
a
10
x
Critical PCI = 55
0
0
5
x
x
x
10 15
Age (year)
x x
x
20
x
25
figure 6: An example of the pavement performance model.
Pavement Treatments and Decision Trees
x
x
30
KCI will coordinate with the City to finalize the pavement treatment types and unit costs of those
treatments to include in the optimization and budget scenario analysis. After the compilation of
available and suitable treatments, KCI will develop a treatment selection decision tree to define
when a particular treatment is used and its consequences. The treatment matrix can be based on
the PCI values, traffic, and section ranks to incorporate the City's pavement preservation goals. To
get the best benefits of each treatment, KCI will use industry best practices and the agency's
institutional knowledge to establish the service life of each treatment, adjusting the condition of
the pavement after the treatment was applied, the cycle number of the treatment, and the overall
age of the pavement. KCI will work with the City to include new pavement preservation and
maintenance techniques recommended by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to
?,Ad�PA NT_ SIL)LwUAIK AND :`VDDITION,\L CITY ASSFFS CONDITIOr.; :4 SESS
N
KCI F L-CHNC1LOGIL i;
develop the treatment matrix. Based on the City's requirements, KCI will create treatment
selection decision trees in the PAVER/StreetSaver software. A sample treatment decision tree is
provided in Table 2 below.
I able 2: A sample treatment matrix for collector roads.
Sample Treatment Matrix for Asphalt Pavements
PCI
Localized Preventive
Localized StopGap
Major M&R
Pavement Preservation
0
10
No Localized
Preventive Treatment
(PCI< Critical)
,Patching and Repair
c, s r� el, 1„ 7
:
i .L ' }`i�' r `
�i
Z.0" Mill tt& Overlla i
v-50 s 3
_ i ! r
No Pavement
Preservation
25
70
100
Crack Seal and ..
Distress Repair
(PCI Critical)
No Localized StopGap/ Major M&R
(PCI > Critical)
r i , , if
Budget and Condition Scenario Analysis
KCI will work with the City to generate pavement budget and condition prediction scenarios. A few
examples of scenarios that can be generated in PAVER/StreetSaver are listed below. Figure 7
shows a sample budget scenario and resulting pavement conditions by year.
a) Scenario 1- Budget required to maintain PCI from report
b) Scenario 2 - Budget required to achieve a 70 PCI
c) Scenario 3 - PCI change with current funding
d) Scenario 4 - PCI change with an additional $200,000 of funding per year
e) Scenario 5 - PCI change by resurfacing the lowest 5 PCI streets per year
PA Eh,T, SIUF ,'/ ' I K. ,ANA) ADuI 'ION+N- I ('1 iA E TS CONU' fl(_)ri`i A>>t_SSP1cf�T
KCI FECHN0I.0 0 II INC.
100
x 90 -
ar
• 80 -
c
70
o 60 -
U
.9a • 50 -
E -- $1.0 M/year - Eliminate Backlogs
m 40
—$825K/year - Target PCI 75
o .
• 30 —$736 K/year - Maintain Current Condition
20 $200K/year - Increase Funding
—$160K/year - Maintain Current Funding
a 10 $0/year - Do Nothing
0
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Year
Figure 7: Sample budget scenario and pavement conditions.
ITEM 6: DEVELOPMENT OF A FIVE-YEAR PLAN
KCI will recommend a five-year pavement preservation, maintenance, and rehabilitation plan
beginning in FY 2022-2023 based on the data populated in the PAVER/StreetSaver database. The
five-year program will include what type of maintenance and repair, when to apply, and where to
apply based on the City's budget to improve the overall conditions of the pavement network.
ITEM 7: REPORT AND DELIVERABLES
KCI will coordinate with the City to create condition reports depicting the status of the existing
City streets. KCI will provide a written report to the City for review. The report will include an
executive summary of the current City street inventory with associated data such as street limits,
length, width, type of paving, classification, area of the street, segment PCI and zone, picture of
each PCI range (in increments of 10), and analysis of the current condition of the streets.
The report will also include a map that shows the current zones PCI and a map that shows the zone
PCI's at the end of the five-year program based on the current budget to show the result of the
five-year program. KCI will provide the following pavement images, data, maps, and report during
the course of the project:
• Surface imaging and/or video of the network that can be integrated into the approved
Pavement Management Software and provided to the City.
• Georeferenced high -resolution right-of-way images from forward -facing and rear -facing
cameras will be delivered to the City upon completion of the inspection and assessment.
P.\V_^a[N", SIDE` -,'JAL',< , AND ADDitIONAL CITY ASSETS CONUitIO:N A;SESSN
!T
KCI 1--l:HNUL0(. I I-. :; NC
For every pavement section, the images will be provided in an external hard drive along
with an image location table with hyperlinks to access the images.
• KCI will deliver all pavement condition data collected to the City through the
PAVER/StreetSaver software. This will include the following attributes:
o Pavement section inventory after verification for each section
o Pavement condition inspection data i.e., distress type, severity, and extent
o PCI for each section
o IRI for each section
• Based on the City's desires and expectations, KCI will create a five-year program based on
optimization analysis and will identify feasible rehabilitation alternatives for each street
section and will recommend treatment type such as slurry seals, cape seals, overlays and
reconstruction, their application times, and cost estimates.
• KCI will generate predictions for scenarios as required by the City, based on information
provided by the City over a five-year period, and provide repair strategy recommendations
based on the actual budget.
• City's sidewalks condition data and condition score in a GIS shapefile and excel format
including uplifts, bumps, holes, cracking, surface texture, and compliance with ADA
sidewalk width.
• City's compliance with ADA ramps in GIS shapefile and excel format, measuring the
attributes such as ramp slope and cross slope, road slope and cross slope, flare slopes,
ramp width, landing area, tactile pad (present/not present/condition).
• KCI has the experience and can provide a five-year plan for right-of-way assets, i.e.,
sidewalk, signage, streetlights, trees, and paving markings rehabilitation or replacement
based on the City's anticipated revenues.
• KCI will provide training on the approved software to designated staff either in person or
via Microsoft Teams or another application that is available for the City to use. KCI will also
provide temporary 30 -day licenses of approved software to all attendees. KCI will provide a
training manual and software installation guidelines ahead of the training sessions.
N
EI,IE T SIDE'S') LK, AND .ADD ii()NAL CIT ASSETS COND LORI '` S:=SSr'iLN1
KCI TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE
KCI and DTS have proven Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) procedures for all MAC image
collection projects. QC procedures begin with the MAC image collection process. During image
data collection, KCI will collect data based on these requirements:
• Start data collection at least an hour after sunrise
Stop data collection an hour before sunset
• Only survey clear and dry pavements
Quality is checked in parallel to
reduce schedule disruptions and
repeated work.
The MAC technician will check each camera's exposure rate, image quality, GPS, and IMU operation
to ensure the MAC system is recording the image, GPS, DMI, IMU data, and the GPS location is
within the stated project tolerance. Each collection day's calibration collection will be documented
in the MAC collection logbook.
The MAC calibration/control site, which serves as quality control for data collection, will
consist of a minimum of nine grid pavement points that are surveyed for a precise and
accurate image daily calibration check.
Each MAC vehicle will collect the calibration site every day of collection for the project
duration as a MAC system QC item. This process ensures that each days run can be
calibrated based on the accuracy requirements (sub -meter) of the project.
The MAC system is capable of collecting all
right-of-way images and pavement data
concurrently. During image collection, the
MAC technician reviews the images
collected on -screen as they are collected,
and any issue with image clarity requires
the collection run to end and the image
quality issue to be resolved. This provides
real-time verification that the equipment is
operating correctly.
Once resolved, the collection run begins
from the beginning for the road segment
collected. The MAC technician also
monitors GPS reception during collection. If GPS reception is lost and measured
using PDOP(positional dilution of precision), the MAC technician stops the collection
and resolves the GPS reception issue. The collection begins again once the GPS
reception issue is resolved.
DTS employs an originator/checker process for processed and compiled data where the
project engineer(originator) provides a qualified project QC checker to review and check
processed and compiled data.
• The QC checker reviews calibration/correlation data and imagery for data anomalies
and inconsistent pavement data, false positives (incorrect distress) pavement
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECI$N'DI �;� �_� i f INC
distress vectors, and quality of post -processed MAC imagery.
• The project manager, engineer, and QC checker determine if any errors found
requires a run to be recollected
ADDITIONAL ASSET COLLECTION
Pavement Markings
MAC vehicles will collect right-of-way asset inventories while data is collected for the pavement
management system. The vehicles will capture images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet
for both forward and side -facing directions and geo-referenced to the pavement inventory by
segment. DTS will collect pavement markings with the following attributes:
Pavement Markings Attributes (Point Feature):
• AssetlD
• Category: Left Arrow, Right Arrow, Straight Arrow, ONLY, SCHOOL, XING, STOP, AHEAD,
BUS, Left-thru Arrow, Right-thru Arrow, Bike Icon, BIKE, ENDS, LANE, Bike Diamond, Bike
Arrow, Merge Left Arrow, Merge Right Arrow, Speed Hump Arrow, Speed Hump Block,
SLOW, Left/Right Arrow, etc.
• Location: Street Name, GPS location (+/- 2 meters)
• Condition: Good, Fair, or Critical
• Photo Image link
Figure 8. Sample image of pavement markings collected with MAC LRIS system.
Traffic Signage
A,!['AENT, S -)E1WALK, AND ACDITION A,_ (_1 1-Y ASSETS CONDITION ASS1 S5M NT
K C; C'rlNOI OC;IF IN
MAC vehicles will collect right-of-way asset inventories while data is collected for the pavement
management system. The vehicles will capture images at an interval of approximately 10 to 15 feet
for both forward and side -facing directions and geo-referenced to the pavement inventory by
segment. DTS will collect traffic signs with the following attributes:
■ AssetlD
■ Sign Category: Regulatory, Warning, Guide, School, Recreation, Information, General
■ Sign Name: Federal or State MUTCD designation or custom designation for specialized
signs
• Location: Street Name, GPS Location (+/- 2 meters)
• Sign and Post Condition: Good, Fair, Critical
Figure 9. Sample MAC LRIS vehicle imagery of signs.
Stormwater, and Water/Sewer Infrastructure
KCI has significant experience and strong team to develop the current inventory and condition
assessment criteria and workflows to perform an inventory of stormwater assets, develop a data
collection application for storm drain compilation, locate and map stormwater assets, and perform
a condition assessment of stormwater features. For the City, we will develop an inventory of
stormwater and water/sewer infrastructure with the following attributes at a minimum:
• AssetlD
• Category: Catch basins, Manholes, Fire Hydrants, and Sewer and Water Valves
Siu. :d,L_K AND ADI
I
(. A.iSE i S COiND
N ASS FS`)MEN'
!• i Ni 01 IHIt i i i:; _
■ Location: Street Name, GPS Location (+/- 2 meters)
Trees
A visual review of the trees which shall determine the current condition and whether maintenance
or replacement is required.
AssetlD
Location: Street Name, GPS Location (+/- 2 meters)
Condition
Figure 10. Sample of tree inventory and condition assessment integrated into GIS.
Streetlights
We will use a customized rating system to efficiently quantify both the overall condition of the
streetlight assets, and the condition of the streetlights' individual components. We will utilize
Trimble TerraFlex & ESRI's ArcGIS Online to create a custom data collection form and tracking tool
used by our field staff on a tablet. The streetlights attributes will include:
■ AssetlD
Location: Street Name, GPS Location (+/- 2 meters)
■ Verification of Lights, Type, and Size: Sodium Vapor(HPS), Mercury Vapor, LED
■ Pole Number and Size
A,=2,"_P;T, SIL)E'V A LK. AND AL)u ')N AL C I ' ! ASSETS C,0N, iION; ASSc'iiP,iFi,T
KCI I EC..f-INI0L013I -` , INC.
• Working condition of Lights: Broken sensors, running continuously, intermittent lighting,
broken parts, decreased brightness due to dirt and bugs in the fixture, etc.
• Light Quality: Lumens, Visibility, Obstruction
■ Map
Figure 11. Sample of drainage area showing stormwater assets.
:Af=MLNT, 3IUE`PJ\1K, ANU ADDITEON:I CITY A. ,5.1; 5 COnDIT10 1 A S.1_S P't=t1T
E'IPEF'E
QLJAIJF'
ND
A ti c
EC.Ed NI0 0GIES. .
3.2.6 TAB 5 -EXPERIENCE AND OUALIFICATIONS
3.2.6.1 Specify the number of years the Proposer has been in business: 67
3.2.6.2 Identify the Proposer's qualifications to perform the services identified in this RFP as
listed in section 2-2 of the Scope of Services.
FIRM'S DEMONSTRATED CAPABILITY
Team Introduction
The KCI team brings together experience from our dedicated Pavement and Asset Management
practice as well as DTS who brings over 16 years of experience providing pavement collection
services. The KCI team will provide the project management, QA/QC of pavement condition
assessment, budget and condition scenario analysis in PAVER/StreetSaver, pavement
maintenance and rehabilitation analysis to develop a five-year program, sidewalk and ramps
condition assessment and ADA compliance evaluation, final reports, and pavement management
software training. KCI will also provide additional right-of-way assets inventory and condition
assessment services. DTS will provide pavement imagery data collection and determination of PCI
values.
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
KCI's corporate purpose is to work together to implement great ideas that improve people's lives.
KCI is a 100 percent employee -owned engineering, consulting, and construction firm serving
clients throughout the nation. KCI's corporate vision is to be the professional consulting firm of
choice for our employee -owners, clients, and business partners. With more than 1,900 full-time
employees collaborating on diverse projects, KCI is constantly driven by energy, passion, and
talent. We are a recognized industry leader, employing innovative technologies, management
practices, and strategic growth initiatives. The strong team we've built over the last 67 years
operates as a single entity made up of technical specialists that provide a collaborative, efficient
suite of services across core markets. Our multi -disciplined offerings allow us to offer exceptional
turn -key project delivery. Our people, projects, and organizational success have been honored with
awards from some of the trade's most prestigious bodies.
Asset Managernent
Our dedicated asset management practice is founded on the core
principles of enterprise asset management and is backed by a highly a1 ')�
qualified ISO -certified team. Our Asset Management professionals have E
become certified by the Institute of Asset Management (IAM) in the a,
"Principles of Asset Management." Our goal is to provide guidance to our r42e4, c
m
clients that align with core principles and best practices when �� of Asst '
establishing any new program or organization. Our multi -disciplinary team
of trained asset management professionals has unparalleled breadth and depth of expertise. We
?.t EP ENi )IDI= vALK, AND ADUIIIONAt SsE S coiNDITIOIN ASS i:S`iivlt N
KCI L-CriN 0I_0GI . INC.
pride ourselves on offering technical solutions to our clients through innovative thinking and
technology. Our engineers, certified maintenance and reliability professionals, business analysts,
and technologists are well versed in developing and implementing municipal asset management
programs — across all spectrums of readiness and asset management maturity — which integrate
people, processes, and technology to enhance asset value.
KCI has been instrumental in the development, customization, and implementation of PMS using
PAVER/StreetSaver, working closely with clients to gather the business and system requirements
for the PMS throughout its implementation. In addition, we assist our clients in developing the
network -level pavement management optimization process. The KCI team is well -experienced in
developing performance models for the various condition measures collected, including IRI,
rutting, cracking, and friction for each group or family of pavement. The KCI team has also been
involved in budget optimization and prioritization and developing a treatment decision matrix,
including identifying the feasibility and consequences of each treatment. KCI's pavement asset
management, engineering, and planning capabilities can be summarized as:
• Data Collection Services
o Pavement condition assessment (surface distress, ride quality, and structural)
o Asset inventory and assessment on a GIS platform (trees, signs, traffic signals,
curb, gutter, lighting, and any other linear/point asset that can be tied to a GPS
coordinate)
o 360° camera high -resolution video -logging of right-of-way
• Customized Asset Management Software
o Central management system implementation for all assets
• CMMS, Cityworks, Maximo, Cartegraph OMS, PAVER/StreetSaver, etc.
o Decision support policies and analysis
o Mobile applications for field support (asset inventory, condition surveys, and
maintenance activities)
• Signs, markings, guardrails, light poles, traffic signals, signal switch boxes
o GIS integration and GIS/database management
o Web -portal and cloud data visualization tools
• Engineering and Planning Services
o Multi -year maintenance and capital improvement plan (CIP) development
o Maintenance quality assurance review
o Governmental policy compliance (GASB 34, retroreflectivity)
o Non-destructive testing of pavements
• Ground penetrating radar(GPR)
• Falling weight deflectometer(FWD)
o Pavement design and Analysis
• AASHTOWare ME pavement design and life -cycle -cost analysis(LCCA)
t' FMENT, ,IDEANA_K, AND ADDLTIONAL CI F'/ ASSET ONDITION A>>ESSTV; t . F
KCI i_CHN.10 I Ni I._
Data Transfer Solutions, LLC
DTS is a transportation planning, engineering, GIS, and asset management solutions company
organized in the State of Florida in 2006 as a limited liability company. DTS is a business unit of
Atkins North America, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of SNC-Lavalin Group, Inc.
DTS has vast experience with automated data collection and processing pavement, asset and
geometric data for DOT (state), city and county clients across the US in accordance with a variety
of standards and methodologies including the ASTM 06433 standard. The DTS business philosophy
recognizes the importance of asset management as strategically targeting resources in an
efficient and cost-effective manner has become increasingly critical for agencies given the
current and foreseeable fiscal funding environment. Organizations are frequently asked to do more
with less, and in transportation asset management that means strategically targeting and
prioritizing assets in poor condition and having the highest consequences of failure. DTS' Mobile
Asset Collection (MAC)vehicle has received independent inertial profiler certification from the
Texas A&M Transportation Institute to ensure the most accurate measurements for IRI.
DTS is a leader in pavement condition assessments and asset management within the North
American market. DTS provides state-of-the-art tools and solutions with considerable experience
in delivery of PCI ratings data for Pavement Management Systems. Further, DTS has received
independent inertial profiler certification from Texas A&M Transportation beginning in 2015. DTS
has collected and compiled data for over 200,000 miles of roadways and 2,000,000 assets in the
past five years including right-of-way, pavement imagery and mobile LiDAR that have been
integrated into a suite of web -based and GIS-centric databases.
Sample Pavement Condition Survey and Right -of -Way Asset Evaluation Clients
Lakeland, FL
Seminole County, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Orlando, FL
Winter Springs, FL
Cobb County, GA
Jefferson County, CO
Rhode Island DOT
Amarillo, TX
Colorado DOT
Kingsport, TN
Richland Hills, TX
Ascension Parish, LA
Denison, TX
Chicago CMAP
San Antonio, TX
Austin, TX
Durham, NC
Lewisville, TX
Knoxville, TN
Brownsville, TX
Greenville, SC
Peoria, IL
Tyler Area MPO, TX
Charleston County,
SC
Harris County, TX
Pikes Peak Area COG
Virginia Beach, VA
Charlotte, NC
Houston, TX
Pitkin County, CO
Waller County, TX
Cheyenne, WY
Indianapolis, IN
Plano, TX
Wickenburg, AZ
PAVE i- SI L ALI<. AMD '',DDI:IOP,A f r(( .A;`:PTS `_0N Uri :A"DSF„'`;le
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
CITY OF OPA LOCKA
ROBERT ZUCCARO, PE
Nicholas Leone, PE,
FSESCI
Shahidul Islam,
PhD, PE
Amanda O'Shea,
GISP, PMP
Jonathan Geiger,
EIT, ENV SP
Leon Parker
Byron Rey
Anthony Greives
Marcial Mote
PAVE ilE , SiDES?'AI K, AND A':JIJ
1H) AL CITY \SSE CONDIIION •\;iES ivIENi
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
BS / Civil Engineering /
Clarkson University
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
PE / FL / 17931
NPDES Qualified
Stormwater Management
Inspector/ 7089
Envision Sustainability
Professional (ENV SP)
Aegion Cured -In -Place
Solutions Certificate
HAZWOPER
40 -Hour Course
HAZWOPER
8 -Hour Refresher Course
KCI Project Manager
Certification
YEARS EXPERIENCE
41
YEARS WITH KCI
7
ROBERT ZUCCARO, PE
Project Manager
Mr. Zuccaro has experience on a wide range of successful engineering projects by
providing planning, design, permitting, construction phase services and final
certifications. His experience is in land development, transportation, and environmental
projects. Mr. Zuccaro has been a project manager for a wide range of governmental and
private sector clients. He has supervised the design, planning, platting, surveying,
permitting, specifications, contract administration, construction observation, record
drawings, and final certifications for medical facilities, airports, roadways, water and
sewer systems, lift and pump stations, and sewage treatment plants.
City of Delray Beach, Public Right -of -Way Accessibility
Improvements - Delray Beach, FL. Project Manager. The project
included the addition of missing sidewalk segments and correction
of the existing ADA deficiencies, as identified in the City's ADA Self -
Evaluation and Transition Plan for 15 streets. The primary purpose of
this project was to bring ADA deficient segments of sidewalks,
intersections, driveways and curb ramps into compliance. Sidewalks
that were not ADA compliant will be replaced in kind, where feasible.
In areas where there was no existing sidewalk, a new sidewalk will be
installed as per the City's latest standard details.
Covenant Living SWM Permit 5-Yr Renewal - Plantation, FL. Project
Manager. KCI performed an inspection of the 16.3 -acre property's
Surface Water Management (SWM) system's condition as required by
Old Plantation Water Control District. KCI observed 44 control
structures, six headwalls, inlets, manholes, multiple grates, manhole
covers, outfalls, two detention/retention ponds, swales, and
pavement above the site's drainage pipe network. All components of
the system were inspected visually, photographed, and included in
the final report to the client.
Loxahatchee Club Pavement, Curbing and Drainage Assessment
and Recommendation - Jupiter, FL. Project Manager. KCI provided
pavement condition assessment of all streets within the 360 -acre
Loxahatchee Club residential development. The scope included the
inventory of streets, concrete valley gutters, catch basins, and the
piping network that ultimately discharged into a system of
interconnected lakes and outfalls. KCI's recommendations for
remediation of drainage/ponding issues included the need for
further review of the drainage piping system via CCTVing within the
interconnecting lakes for blockage.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT 2/
KCI TECIINOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
PhD / Civil Engineering /
University of Illinois at
Urbana -Champaign
MS / Civil Engineering /
Kansas State University
BS / Civil Engineering /
Bangladesh University of
Engineering & Technology
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
PE/TX/131232
PE / MD / 58526
PE / NC / 053150
PE / VA / 0402064458
YEARS EXPERIENCE
13
YEARS WITH KCI
1.5
SHAHIDUL ISLAM, PHD, PE
Pavement Management Analysis and QA/QC Manager
Dr. Islam is an expert in pavement evaluation, asset management and has implemented
pavement management systems for 25+ agencies using PAVER, StreetSaver, and
Cartegraph OMS. He workers as the Project/Task Manager of the pavement condition
evaluation, refining pavement performance models, and developing a five-year plan for
25+ agencies. He also provided training on pavement management soft,vares to the
engineering and management staff of those 25+ agencies.
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, Pavement Management
System Implementation — Chicago, IL. Project Manager. Dr. Islam led
this effort to assess pavement conditions, develop budget scenarios
evaluating the costs, and recommended a 5 -10 -year capital
pavement program based on the selected pavement condition and
budgets using PAVER. The project included pavement condition data
collection for 20 villages, cities, and counties, the development of
pavement condition prediction models, pavement treatment matrix,
and pavement preservation plans. Dr. Islam provided training on
PAVER to the local agency staff from 20 agencies.
City of Milford, Pavement Management System Implementation -
Milford, DE. Project Manager. Dr. Islam led this effort to assess the
current condition of pavement, implementing a pavement
management system (PMS), and recommending a five-year capital
improvement plan (CIP) based on the available budgets and goals.
The project included pavement condition evaluation for
approximately 50 miles of streets using an automated Laser Crack
Measurement System (LCMS), PCI and IRI determination,
development of pavement condition prediction models, pavement
treatment matrix, and pavement preservation plans.
Pavement Condition Assessment and Capital Improvement Plan for
Town of Lyman, SC. Project Manager. Dr. Islam led the effort of a
complete inventory and condition assessment of about 66 centerline
miles within the Town's jurisdiction and to develop a pavement
maintenance plan that will result in the greatest return on
investment. He developed pavement performance models using the
pavement condition and the historical paving data to forecast the
future condition and recommended annual budgets by maintenance
and rehabilitation activities assuming different condition/budget
scenarios. Dr. Islam developed rehabilitation and preventative
maintenance strategies, including appropriate treatments such as
slurry seal, chip seal, overlay and fill reconstruction.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, ANIJ ADDITIONAL. CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
EDUCATION
BS / Geography / The
Pennsylvania State
University
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
GISP/ 57720
PMP / 3008601
ESRI Enterprise Geodata
Management Associate
10.1
YEARS EXPERIENCE
22
YEARS WITH KCI
15
AMANDA O'SHEA, LISP, PMP
GIS Integration Manager
Ms. O'Shea is a Project Manager lead in KCI's Asset Management practice with 22 years
of experience in the development of GIS solutions. Her previous experience includes
geodatabase development, GIS analysis, digital field data collection system design and
implementation, project GPS setup and support, and quality control Her expertise in
managing GIS data acquisition projects will provide seamless collaboration on projects.
Ms. O'Shea's computer skills include ArcGIS Desktop, ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Enterprise,
Portal for ArcGIS, ArcSDE, ArcServer, ArcGIS Online, Field Maps; Collector for ArcGIS,
Survey123, ArcPad, Microsoft SQL Server, Cityworks AMS, Cityworks PLL, Geocortex
Essentials, Trimble Business Suite, ConununityvIZ, GlohalMapper, and Mapinfo.
Pavement Condition Assessment — Elbert County, GA. Elbert
County, responsible for about 371 miles of paved roadways,
contracted KCI to perform condition assessments of these assets
and capture that data electronically for future maintenance and
asset management use. Ms. O'Shea developed an application based
on the Georgia Department of Transportation's Pavement Condition
Evaluation System (PACES)and used commercially available tools
such as ArcGIS and Survey123 to set up the database, field form, web
maps, and web/mobile application.
Pavement Condition Assessment - Cherokee County, SC. Cherokee
County, responsible for about 361 miles of paved roadways,
contracted KCI to perform condition assessments of these assets
and capture that data electronically for future maintenance and
asset management use. Ms. O'Shea developed an application based
on the ASTM D6433 Pavement Condition Index determination
methodology, to assess the type, severity, and extent of pavement
distresses and used commercially available tools such as ArcGIS and
Survey123 to set up the database, field form, web maps and
web/mobile application. An ESRI ArcGIS-based dashboard was
developed to display pavement attributes and condition data.
Pavement Condition Assessment - City of Chamblee, GA. The City
of Chamblee, GA, responsible for about 90 miles of paved roadways,
contracted KCI to perform condition assessments of these assets
and capture that data electronically for future use in maintenance
and asset management. Ms. O'Shea developed an application based
on the Georgia Department of Transportation's Pavement Condition
Evaluation System (PACES) and used commercially available tools
such as ArcGIS and Survey123 to set up the database, field form, web
maps, and web/mobile application.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI l LCHNOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
BS / Civil Engineering /
University of Pittsburg
BS / Mathematics /
Indiana University of
Pennsylvania
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
PE / FL / 85655
PMP / 3008601
FDOT Airfield Pavement
Inspection
Florida, 2018, BT -10-0004
YEARS EXPERIENCE
14
YEARS WITH KCI
1
NICHOLAS LEONE, PE, FSESCI
Right -of -Way Asset Evaluation
Mr. Leone's experience encompasses a wide range of development projects for both
public and private clients at all stages of a project's life cycle. Mr. Leone's primary
experience lies in geometric site layouts, pavement inspections and designs for both
rigid and flexible pavements, utility design, and various rehabilitation projects. He has
developed these skills and others over the course of his career +working for a variety of
clients such as the FAA and the U.S. Department of Defense. Mr. Leone currently serves
KCI as a Project Manager and PE. He has been the PM and engineer -of -record for the
rehabilitation of Ocean Reef Club's runway in Monroe County, FL. He has also served as
the client manager for several Authorities, where he developed capital improvement
plans, master plans, and grant applications to secure funding through both federal and
state development grants. His career stretches a large geographical area and includes
work on projects throughout the United States, Europe, and the Middle East.
Pittsburgh International Airport and Allegheny County Airport,
Pavement Management Program - Pittsburgh, PA. Performed yearly
inspections of the pavement assets at both Pittsburgh International
Airport and Allegheny County Airport. Distresses for the runways,
taxiways, aprons, and access roads were entered into PAVER to
manage, maintain, and determine a PCI for the various segments of
pavement. A Pavement Management Report was developed each
year for each airport as part of the Pavement Management Program
and was used as basis for determining and prioritizing pavement
rehabilitations and reconstructions. The program was developed in
accordance with the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5380-7A, Airport
Pavement Management Program.
Allegheny County Airport Authority, Pit Old Ramp Pavement Survey
- Pittsburgh, PA. Performed a visual inspection of an abandoned,
older piece of pavement for the Allegheny County Airport Authority
to determine its useability. The data from the inspection was then
drawn in AutoCAD so that plans could be developed to quantify the
repairs and establish an engineer's opinion of probable construction
costs for the ramp.
Mid -Ohio Valley Regional Airport, Airfield Pavement Rehabilitation
Program and Rehabilitation of Runway 3-21 Wood County, WV.
Wood County Airport Authority. Performed on -site pavement
inspections for the entire airport and used the data to determine
areas that were most in need of rehabilitation. Construction
documents were then developed for the area and Mr. Leone provided
on -site construction inspection and management at the airport.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADrJ@TIoNAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT ;r,
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
BS / Civil Engineering /
University of Central
Florida
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
EIT / FL / 1100018738
Envision Sustainability
Professional (ENV SP) /
39902
YEARS EXPERIENCE
7
YEARS WITH KCI
5
JONATHAN GEIGER, EIT, ENV SP
Right -of -Way Asset Evaluation
Mr. Geiger has worked as an engineer -in -training on both private and government
projects in Miami -Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach Counties that have involved civil site
and utilities design, permitting at both the state and local levels. and construction
phase services. Mr. Geiger is experienced with AutoCAD, and has experience working in
the field in construction, furthering his understanding of the engineer -contractor
relationship.
City of Delray Beach, Public Right -of -Way Accessibility
Improvements - Delray Beach, FL. Design Engineer. Mr. Geiger was a
member of the team that performed field survey within the proposed
project limits. He identified the potential aboveground existing
utilities in areas receiving new sidewalks including the conflicts of
existing power poles and new sidewalk locations. He performed the
field measurement of sidewalk attributes for ADA compliance
including the longitudinal slope and cross slope with digital levels
and recorded and tabulated for use in developing areas needing
design for replacement. The design in certain areas required
relocation of drainage structure to comply with sidewalk ADA
criteria.
Loxahatchee Club Pavement, Curbing and Drainage Assessment
and Recommendation - Jupiter, FL. Design Engineer. Mr. Geiger
provided pavement condition assessment of all streets within the
360 -acre Loxahatchee Club residential development. The scope
included the inventory of streets, concrete gutters, catch basins,
and the piping network that discharged into a system of interconnect
lakes and outfalls. KCI's recommendations for remediation of
drainage issues included the need for further review of the drainage
piping system via CCTVing within the interconnecting lakes for
blockage.
Covenant Living SWM Permit 5-Yr Renewal - Plantation, FL. Design
Engineer. Mr. Geiger performed an inspection of the 16.3 -acre
property's Surface Water Management (SWM)system's condition as
required by Old Plantation Water Control District. He researched the
existing permit, existing as-builts and record plans along with the
client's operation log and maintenance prior to performing
assessment necessary to bring the permit into compliance with
plans and permits. KCI observed 44 control structures, 6 headwalls,
inlets, manholes, multiple grates, manhole covers, outfalls, 2
detention and retention ponds, swales, and pavement above the
site's drainage pipe network.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL ci r'! ASSEIS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
BS / Civil Engineering /
Florida A&M University
YEARS EXPERIENCE
8
YEARS WITH KCI
2
BYRON REY
Sidewalk and ADA Compliance Evaluation
Mr. Reynolds has over eight years of experience in the private sector working on
commercial development projects gaining experience with the building and planning
right-of-way assets and underground systems, while concurrently preparing
construction and environmental compliance documents; developing grading plans, cost
estimates, and bid specifications; and providing construction oversight, environmental
sampling, and site reconnaissance.
City of Delray Beach, Public Right -of -Way Accessibility
Improvements - Delray Beach, FL. Design Engineer. Mr. Rey was a
member of the team that performed field survey within the proposed
project limits. He identified the potential aboveground existing
utilities in areas receiving new sidewalks including the conflicts of
existing power poles and new sidewalk locations. He performed the
field measurement of sidewalk attributes for ADA compliance
including the longitudinal slope and cross slope with digital levels
and recorded and tabulated for use in developing areas needing
design for replacement. The design in certain areas required
relocation of drainage structure to comply with sidewalk ADA
criteria.
Loxahatchee Club Pavement, Curbing and Drainage Assessment
and Recommendation - Jupiter, FL. Design Engineer. Mr. Rey
provided pavement condition assessment of all streets within the
360 -acre Loxahatchee Club residential development. The scope
included the inventory of streets, concrete gutters, catch basins,
and the piping network that discharged into a system of interconnect
lakes and outfalls. KCI's recommendations for remediation of
drainage issues included the need for further review of the drainage
piping system via CCTVing within the interconnecting lakes for
blockage.
5-YR SWM Permit Renewal 1341 NW 15 Street - Pompano Beach, FL.
Design Engineer. Mr. Rey performed an inspection of the 16.3 -acre
property's Surface Water Management (SWM) system's condition as
required by Old Plantation Water Control District. He researched the
existing permit, existing as-builts and record plans along with the
client's operation log and maintenance prior to performing
assessment necessary to bring the permit into compliance with
plans and permits. KCI observed 44 control structures, 6 headwalls,
inlets, manholes, multiple grates, manhole covers, outfalls, 2
detention and retention ponds, swales, and pavement above the
site's drainage pipe network.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
MS / Civil Engineering /
University of Central
Florida
BS / Civil Engineering /
Universidad
Iberoamericana
YEARS EXPERIENCE
7
YEARS WITH DTS
1
ANTHONY GREIVES
Mobile Van Data Collection Manager
Mr. Greives has been on the Data Transfer Solutions team since 2015, and he has
worked in several different positions during this time period. At 0TS, his positions have
included MAC vehicle operator, pavement analyst and LiDAR analyst. As the Data
Collection Manager, he oversees all data collection conducted via the firm's MAC fleet
and addresses any issues that may arise with equipment.
City of Orlando, Pavement Management and Right -of -Way Survey -
Orlando, FL. Data Collection and Data Processing Operator. The City
contracted with DTS to collect pavement data for approximately 825
lane miles of City roadways including about 55 miles of brick surface
streets. DTS used MAC vehicles to collect pavement and right-of-way
asset data from which PCI and other relevant information were
extracted.
Harris County, Pavement and Asset Data Collection Services -
Houston, TX. Asset Collection Manager. For the 12,888 lane miles of
roadways maintained by Harris County, the third most populous
county in the nation, DTS is currently performing a variety of road
asset services. DTS is using several asset collection vehicles to
capture pavement and right-of-way images to assist the County with
maintaining its transportation assets. During the project, DTS will
provide pavement modeling, maintenance, and rehabilitation
updates and reports and also provide a sidewalk inventory including
locations, photos, width, and condition rating.
City of Houston, Street Data Collection and Pavement Management
Program Update - Houston, TX. Data Collection Manager.
Subsequent to the successful completion by DTS of the similar
three-year the City of Houston Pavement Management Information
System (PMIS-Next G) project, the firm was selected by the City to
carry out the four-year Street Collection and Pavement Management
Program Update. For all major and local streets in the City, DTS
performed a pavement survey, rated the pavement, determining the
pavement width and geocoded the data. The mileage collected
included more than 1,200 centerline miles of major streets and 4,900
centerline miles of local streets. Mr. Greives ensured that there were
no issues with the vehicles from the DTS Mobile Asset Collection
fleet involved on the project.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT 3.3
KCI TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
EDUCATION
Computer Repair and
Networking, New
Horizons, 2008
REGISTRATIONS/
CERTIFICATIONS
Texas DOT PMIS Visual
Rater Cert Flex PV. CON
111(Asphalt), 2018
Texas DOT PMIS Visual
Rater Cert Flex PV. CON
110 (Concrete), 2018
YEARS EXPERIENCE
7
YEARS WITH DTS
7
MARCIAL MOTA
Pavement Condition Rating
Mr. Mote is a Pavement Engineer on the Data Transfer Solutions Mobile Asset Collection
and Extraction Team. Mr. Mota has more than one year of experience in rating
pavement, performing Quality Assurance and Quality Control of pavement distresses,
performing PCI calculations, writing pavement reports and importing pavement data
into a variety of pavement management software. He is proficient in EarthShaper',
AutoCAD, MicroStation, SAS, MicroPAVER, and ArcMap. Mr. Mota is a member of the
Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers.
City of Plano, Pavement Data Collection Services - Plano, TX. DTS is
currently collecting and rating pavement information for the City of
Plano. The project involves more than 500 lane miles of collection
and rating. Mr. Mota is rating pavement for the project and will assist
with the final report.
City of Laredo, Pavement Management System - Laredo, TX. The
City of Laredo selected DTS to provide professional engineering
services to the City. The scope of the project includes the
development of a fully functioning pavement management system
for the City's road network to include verification of the existing road
inventory, performing pavement distress surveys for more than 1,500
lane miles and evaluating, recommending and implementing an
appropriate pavement management software program. Mr. Mota is a
Pavement Engineer on the project team, and accordingly, he is
assisting with a variety of activities including pavement rating and
QA/QC.
North Tarrant Express Mobility Partners 3, Pavement Condition
Survey - Northeast Tarrant County, TX. DTS recently completed this
project encompassing 173 lane miles of this Texas expressway. The
project involved data collection using a MAC vehicle, 100% rating of
pavement, PCI score development, rutting, ride quality and friction
testing. As a Pavement Engineer for the project, Mr. Mota rated
pavement in conformance with Texas Department of Transportation
standards.
City of Durham, Pavement Condition Survey - Durham, NC. The City
chose DTS to perform this field survey of the pavement condition of
the network of 720 miles of paved City -maintained streets in
accordance with ASTM Standard D6433-16. In addition, DTS is
collecting data regarding pavement width, type of curb and gutter
and depth of gutter pan to the City's specifications. All results will be
uploaded into the City's MicroPAVER pavement management system.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CO(`10rTION ASSFSSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
EDUCATION
BA / Criminal Justice /
University of Central
Florida
YEARS EXPERIENCE
9
YEARS WITH DTS
6
LEON PARKER
Right -of -Way Asset Evaluation
Mr. Parker is a Right -of -Way Asset Manager at DTS. Mr. Parker has 6 years of experience
at DTS where he has served in a number of asset data positions including project
collection technician, asset management specialist and production manager. His
previous hands-on experience as a Mobile Asset Collection technician at DTS gives him
a complete understanding of the asset data from collection through database
finalization.
Brevard County, Pavement Condition Assessment - Brevard
County, FL. QA/QC Manager. DTS provided pavement condition
assessment services to Brevard County. These services include
using MAC vehicles to collect geo-referenced data for the County's
1,120 centerline miles of roadway, pavement analysis and
calculations, maintenance and repair strategy recommendations,
condition forecasting, budget forecasting, and recommendations for
appropriate pavement management software. Mr. Parker was
responsible for QA/QC of the project database prior to its delivery to
the client.
Harris County, Pavement Condition Survey and Right -of -Way -
Harris County, TX. QA/QC Manager. Asset Inventory Utilizing its fleet
of MAC vehicles, DTS collected 12,888 miles of roadway for Harris
County, the county in which Houston is located. DTS provided the
County with its first pavement condition survey as well as an
inventory of sidewalks and ADA ramps. DTS is currently preparing
final reports for each of the four precincts within the County for
pavement condition evaluation including reporting on IRI, PCI, and
related data. Mr. Parker served as the QA/QC manager for the right-
of-way assets.
City of Topeka, Right -of -Way Imagery Collection, Asset Extraction
and Inventory - City of Topeka, KS. QA/QC Manager. DTS utilized its
fleet of Mobile Asset Collection vehicles to provide a pavement
condition survey on the City's 1,600 lane mile network which also
included collection of 166 miles of alleys. DTS provided a pavement
condition survey per the ASTM D6433 methodology and delivered a
final report including data on IRI, PCI, and related data. Mr. Parker
was the QA/QC Manager in charge of delivering asset data for the
project.
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
j
i 9 z t
,,,...4 i r " 1
i�l,I 1 FCHNIOLOGIES. INC.
3.2.7 TAB 6 - SCHEDULE
3.2.7.1 Include a timetable that identifies the amount of time required to complete each
component of the Program.
KCI is proposing a preliminary schedule for four months to complete pavement condition
assessment, budget scenario analysis, development of five-year program, sidewalk and ADA
ramps compliance evaluation from the notice to proceed. For additional asset collection, we are
proposing another three months after the completion of pavement and sidewalk services. We have
an outstanding record completing projects similar in size and scale on time and within budget. We
will deploy experienced personnel and resources necessary to complete the project within the
specified time provided by the City. If inclement weather becomes a significant issue affecting the
pavement data collection efforts, our team has the capacity to mobilize additional MAC vehicles
and field crews to remain on schedule.
Description of Activities
Project Initiation Meeting
Mobile Data Collection and Image Capture
Sidewalk Condition and ADA Compliance
Evaluation
Ramps Condition and ADA Compliance Evaluation
Pavement Inspection and PCI Calculation
Presenting PCI Results to the City
Pavement Repair Analysis, Budget Scenarios and
Optimization
5 -Year Program Development
Final Report and Presentation
Pavement Management Software Training and
Support
2022-2023
Oct 22
Nov 22
Dec 22
Jan 23
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY BASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES. INC.
Additional Asset Collection
Pavement Marking Inventory and Conditions
Traffic Signage Inventory and Conditions
Stormwater, and Water/Sewer Infrastructure
Inventory
Tree Inventory and Conditions
Streetlights Inventory and Conditions
2023
Jan 23
Feb 23
3.2.7.2 Indicate the earliest available start date for your project team.
Our project team will be available within two weeks from notice to procced.
Mar 23
3.2.7.3 Indicate the project completion date based on the date provided in 3.2.7.1.
KCI will complete the pavement, sidewalk, and ADA ramps related services by four(4) months from
the notice to proceed. KCI will complete the additional asset collection services in another three
(3) months as mentioned in the schedule.
PAVEMENT-, S'iDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
GOfS
KCI 117CH 0 OGI1S- I 1N; (_' .
3.2.8 TAB 7 - PRICING OF SERVICES
>,.,a . 1._nT.iv.a.0 mb ..x- *Zia
3.2.8.1 Fee basis should be an all-inclusive, base fee.
KCI's lump sum price for the project is shown in the following table. All prices include labor,
overhead, travel, two year user license of the pavement management software, and other direct
costs. KCI will submit invoices based on percent complete, and all invoices require payment to be
made within 30 days of receipt of our invoice. Based on RFP Pre -Bid Meeting, the City has about 35
miles of sidewalks. Our preliminary investigation shows that the City has about 500 ADA ramps.
The price provided below is based on these assumptions. KCI will charge on a prorated basis for
additional ADA ramps, sidewalk inventory, and condition assessment services. For the streetlights
inventory and condition assessment, both day and night times inspection will be performed.
,?iJ,..,� '�i.
1
®� i /C� i 1�•
.wl.:,,_ _ _...u_V %•1. Tu.:_. ... ._. �i v t. .. V (•4�® t
- -
�u
Project Setup - Project set-up, GIS centerline file review, project
initiation, mobilization & Project Management
$ 14,390.00
2
Mobile Data Collection and Image Capture for City Streets
$ 10,700.00
3
Pavement Condition Rating - Pavement Inspection and PCI Calculation
$ 14,097.00
4
Pavement Repair Analysis, Budget Scenarios and Optimization, 5 -Year
Program Development
$ 20,175.00
5
Final Report, Presentation, Pavement Management Software Training,
and Support
$ 18,807.00
6
Sidewalk and ADA Ramps Condition and ADA Compliance Evaluation
$ 59,788.00
7
Directs (PAVER/StreetSaver License, Hard Drives, Meals)
$ 4,150.00
Total for Pavement, Sidewalk, and ADA Ramps related Services =
$ 142,107.00
Additional Asset Collection
8
Pavement Marking Inventory and Conditions
$ 4,750.00
9
Traffic Signage Inventory and Conditions
$ 9,025.00
10
Stormwater, and Water/Sewer Infrastructure Inventory
$ 12,825.00
11
Tree Inventory and Conditions
$ 8,835.00
12
Streetlights Inventory and Conditions
$ 21,850.00
Total for Additional Asset Inventory and Condition Assessment =
$ 57,285.00
Total for Pavement, Sidewalk, ADA Ramps, and Additional Asset Collection
$ 199,392.00
AT'[(VI - '. , /N K AN[) ADDITIONAL CIT'( _A_sETS (ION DIT N ASS. SS F ;�i'
any resulting contract. The purpose is to insure that the Contractors, in the sole opinion of the City of Opa-locka, can sufficiently and efficiently perform
all the required services in a timely and satisfactory manner as will be required by the subject contract. If there are any terms and/or conditions that are
in conflict, the most stringent requirement shall apply.
RFP NO: 22-0912200
PRICE PROPOSAL FORM
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Firms must use the Cost Proposal below to submit your Firm's cost for this project indicated in the
Scope of Service herein.
The City reserves the right to increase, decrease, and/or choose the items and quantities below for
the Project to meet its available budget using the hourly rates provided below.
Proposing firm must completely fill out each row below.
Your firm must provide a detailed fee schedule that explains the cost and services for each
description of task.
LUMP SUM PRICE: $ 199,392.00
SUBMITTED THIS 19 DAY OF September 2022.
BID SUBMITTED BY:
KCI Technologies, Inc. (410) 527-4415
Company Telephone Number
Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL N/A
Name of Person Authorized to Submit
Bid
Signature
Vice President
Title
Fax Number
heidi.hammel@kci.com
Email Address
18
.v 41;,.1%_9
Laser Crack Measurement System (LCMS)
k r,I ' I', I
3.2.9 TAB 8 - REFERENCES
3.2.9.1 List a minimum of three (3) references in Florida for which the proposer has provided
elevator services. Include the name of the organization, brief description of the project, name
of contact person telephone number and email address.
The KCI team is dedicated to providing quality, responsive services to the City of Opa-Locka. At
KCI, we feel that the best measure of our performance is client satisfaction and our relationship
with our clients. The client references below can attest to the performance of KCI and our key
personnel. We encourage the City of Opa-Locka to discuss with these clients the capabilities of
our firm and proposed staff members.
PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING AND 5 -YEAR CIP
DEVELOPMENT
City of Milford, DE
Valuate with LCMS
Lasers J DistresslCrack Detection
Project Overview
The City of Milford Department of Public Works engaged the KCI Team to help them implement a
Pavement Management System (PMS). The City desired to have a system to record historical
pavement condition data and develop a five-year capital improvement plan objectively, which
motivated the City to invest in new, industry -standard, pavement management system
implementation. In addition, the City desired to implement a comprehensive asset management
program to strengthen business and infrastructure decision -making and provide defined levels of
service to customers. This project aimed to ensure the organization's future readiness through
strategic planning and documentation.
Pavement Condition and Thickness Data Collection
KCI collected geo-referenced images of the entire City's roadway network using the Digital Survey
Vehicle(DSV) DSV equipped with the LCMS and Ground
r \:'EivIENT, SIDE \Ai -\L1<, AND ADDI
ANAL (: f`( i,.>S _ is C 0NUIT10'd AssES M L I
KCI IECHNOI_0OI1=` IN!'.
Penetrating Radar(GPR). Each image is linearly referenced with the
DSV's onboard distance measuring instrument (DMI) and associated
global positioning system (GPS) coordinates.
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Determination
KCI conducted the pavement assessment based on the ASTM D6433
PCI Surveys methodology, to determine the PCI value for each
pavement section. KCI established a database of pavement
conditions, including PCI for each street on a scale from 0 (poorest)
to 100 (excellent). KCI recommended annual maintenance and
rehabilitation activities budgets, assuming different
conditions/budget scenarios. KCI established proper rehabilitation and preventative maintenance
strategies, including appropriate treatments such as slurry seal, chip seal, overlay, and complete
reconstruction. In a five-year forward capital plan, KCI provided estimated costs for the
recommended improvements. The final report also included a condition analysis, different levels
of investments, and recommendations on pavement preservation.
CONTACT
James Puddicombe
(302) 422-1110 x 1108
jpuddicombe@milford-de.gov
DELRAY BEACH - PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACCESSIBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Delray Beach, FL
PA'`iEl,IENT, SID'_:',ALK, AND ADDITIONAL C!TY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI I ElCHINUL (31 ES. II NC.
Project Overview
The project included the addition of missing
sidewalk segments and correction of the existing
ADA deficiencies, as identified in the City's ADA Self -
Evaluation and Transition Plan, for 15 streets,
approximately four miles in length. The primary
purpose of this project was to bring ADA deficient
segments of sidewalks, intersections, driveways,
and curb ramps into compliance. Sidewalks that
were not ADA compliant will be replaced in kind,
where feasible. Areas, where entire sidewalk sections need reconstruction, will be replaced with
the City's latest standard details. In areas where there was no existing sidewalk, a new sidewalk will
be installed as per the City's latest standard details.
KCI provided design survey services, primarily in areas missing sidewalks. Right-of-way lines were
established from plat information without the benefit of title search, where a new sidewalk was
added.
KCI performed initial public outreach involvement, providing a project announcement flyer for
mailout to all property owners fronting streets requiring improvements.
Field reconnaissance within the proposed project limits was performed. A photograph log of the
project walk-through was included. In addition, potential aboveground existing utilities were
identified in areas receiving new sidewalks. Conflicts between existing power poles and new
sidewalk locations were identified. Every existing sidewalk flag was field measured for ADA
compliance for longitudinal slope and cross slope with digital levels and was recorded and
tabulated for use in developing areas needing a design for replacement. The design in certain
areas required red relocation of drainage structure to comply with sidewalk ADA criteria.
KCI reviewed existing profiles at right-of-way lines and compared them to the adjacent edge of
pavement elevations but only in areas receiving new sidewalks. Where a new sidewalk was to be
constructed, KCI analyzed the locations of existing hedges, fences, landscape, and hardscape to
determine the potential impact and need for relocation and provide written documentation of
conflicts. KCI's design included reconstruction of ADA deficient driveways, as identified in ADA
Transition Plan within the existing right-of-way. Typical cross sections were developed for a
variety of conditions encountered by red up to two sections per street.
Sidewalks at intersections were designed to meet ADA criteria using
truncated dome surfaces at street crossings. The design also
meandered sidewalks, where necessary, around objects such as
powerlines or substantial landscaping that will remain in place with
close coordination with City staff.
KCI provided design for the development of construction working
drawings to be part of bid documents to be advertised for competitive
bidding. Plans were prepared at the 50% and 100% design phase.
Technical specifications were also part of the bid documents. KCI also
prepared an Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost.
CONTACT
Denis Placide, Project Manager
(561)243-7346
placided@mydelraybeach.com
PAVEMENT, SiOEWAi X, AND ADDITIONAL iTY ASST T5 CoNDITIO!',i :ASSE TS?•AE I
KCI TECHNOLOGILES INC.
PAVEMENT DATA COLLECTION
Seminole County, FL
Project Overview
DTS performed multiple, phased pavement data collections for the
County. DTS worked with Seminole County to conduct a pavement
condition survey as well as integrating the data into the County's
pavement management system. Seminole County divided its
network into thirds and DTS collected 500 to 700 miles each year
over a three-year period. DTS also imported the data into the
County's PAVER database.
CONTACT
Michael Garcia
(407)665-5674
omgarcia@seminolecountyfl.gov
PA\EYIENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT .:, .�
KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC.
PAVEMENT CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Brevard County, FL
Project Overview
DTS performed a pavement condition assessment on 1,120
centerline miles of County -maintained roads in the County in
accordance with ASTM D6433. The pavement condition
assessment services DTS provided to Brevard County included
using Mobile Asset Collection vehicles to collect geo-referenced
data for the County's roadways, pavement analysis and
calculations, maintenance and repair strategy recommendations,
condition forecasting, budget forecasting and recommendations
for appropriate pavement management software. Two additional
years of regression of the PCI was also completed.
CONTACT
Chris Ireland
(321) 350-8311
christopher.ireland@brevardfl.gov
PAVEMENT. SIDEWALK. AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
City of Altamonte Springs, FL
Project Overview
DTS utilized one of our Mobile Asset Collection vehicles to drive the
98 lane miles of roads maintained by the City of Altamonte Springs
and provide a Pavement Condition Index in accordance with ASTM
06433 standards. Additionally, the DTS team utilized an off -road
vehicle to collect and rate the 54 lane miles of unpaved roads
within the City limits. All pavement widths within the City were
verified and all data was delivered in an Esri GIS format with
corresponding metadata.
CONTACT
Lone "Trey" Sisk
(407) 571-8572
tsisk@altamonte.org
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMEN
!`.CI L HN II
STORM DRAIN INVENTORY PROGRAM
Prince George County, MD
KCI Technologies has been supporting the Prince Georges County DPW&T's storm drain inventory
program since January of 2019. In January of 2019 the KCI team was asked to take over for another
prime consultant that was not meeting expectations. KCI was scoped to update the current
inventory and condition assessment criteria and workflows to perform inventory of stormwater
assets, develop a data collection application for storm drain compilation, locate and map
stormwater assets, and perform a condition assessment of stormwater features. To support with
these efforts KCI included sub -consultant CEM to assist, who were involved in the original effort as
a sub -consultant to another prime consultant. For that original effort CEM performed the field
tasks above expectations, but the
prime consultant did not meet
expectations for the development of
the full storm drain inventory program.
Below is a list of tasks that the KCI
team has completed, and continues to
complete, under three tasks since
January 2019; many of these tasks are
ongoing and require continuous
updates and enhancements based on
lesson's learned, utilization of the
SOPs and application / tools, and
changes to ESRI platforms.
• Our team updated and
enhanced the SOPs and data collection / management workflows used during the storm
drain compilation. The SOPs outline the steps for performing the storm drain inventory
and condition assessment, the hardware and software requirements, data management,
post processing of data, and quality control.
• KCI developed the storm drain database schema and data dictionary that defines the
feature classes, tables, attributes, relationships, and domains that will be utilized during
the storm drain inventory and assessment process.
• Developed the necessary features and back -end database for use in ArcGIS Collector which
allows field teams to collect or modify storm drain inventory geometry and attribute
information.
• our KCI and CEM teams have performed field inventory and condition assessment of more
25,000 storm drain structure and pipes over the past 1.5 years.
• KCI performed an analysis of field -verified inlet features to determine which met the
criteria for cleaning. The resulting inlets features were published to the PG NPDES Portal
and included in a web map. This web map will be used by
field crews to indicate which inlets have been cleaned. CONTACT
Ms. Elizabeth Faye Miller
(301)883-5600
emmiller@co.pg.md.us
NT. S ,r ,,,, .\ , ,,. ,
_)D,T O NA=. Cj t'r 'AS tHi c 0•`dD; [I S S F i= l
KCI TECi-IiNiOLOGILS INC.
3.2.10 TAB 9 - ADDITIONAL FORMS
,9
1112.49E94 31.3RERIMMEEMSICS930.3/69,11.71£ 411...WMA.MareaDAZ,2,11,....1.£6503431..181‘41615i1S11
refer to the following pages for all the following required forms and/or documents
• Proposer Qualifications
• Certification regarding debarment and suspension
• Drug Free workplace certification
• Non -Collusion Affidavit
• Non -Discrimination Affidavit
• E -verify
PAVEMI:PiT, SIDEWA=.n. AND ADDITIONAL (IT'/ -vSSETS `:OND;T ON. ASSLSS '..fit
RFP NO. 22-0912200
PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS
PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, AND ADDITIONAL CITY ASSETS CONDITION ASSESSMENT
The Proposer, as a result of this proposal, MUST hold a County and/or Municipal Contractor's Occupational
License in the area of their fixed business location. The following information MUST be completed and
submitted with the proposal to be considered:
1. Legal [Name and Address:
Name: KCI Technologies, Inc.
Address: 1425 W Cypress Creek Road, Suite 101
City, State, Zip: Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 Phone/Fax: (954) 776-1616
2. Check One: Corporation (X) Partnership () Individual ( )
3. If Corporation, state:
Date of Incorporation: 1955 State in which Incorporated: Delaware
4. If an out-of-state Corporation, currently authorized to do business in Florida, give date of
such authorization: 04/19/1989
5. Name and Title of Principal Officers Date Elected:
The following pages shows KCI's list of Principal Officers
6. The length of time in business: 67 years
7. The length of time (continuous) in business as a service organization in Florida:
33 years
8. Provide a list of at least three commercial or government references that the bidder has
supplied service/commodities meeting the requirements of the City of Opa-locka
specification, during the last twenty-four months. N/A
9. A copy of County and/or Municipal Occupational License(s) See following pages for licenses.
Note: Information requested herein and submitted by the proposers will be analyzed by the City of Opa•locka and will be a factor considered in awarding
17
KCI HOLDINGS, INC./KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
OFFICERS AN D DIRECTORS - 2022
Term of office f or Direct ors is one-ye ar a nd are appointed or re -appoi nted a nd elected by Tr ustees at their Ann ual Stockholders Meeti ng every December.
Term of office for Officers is "perpet ual" until change of status as determined by Board of Directors or whe n employment is terminated.
Title
Chairman of the Board/CEO
President/COO
Senior Vice President, CFO a nd Treasurer
Ex ecutive Vice President
Execu tive V ice President
Senior Vice President
Senior Vice President
Sen ior V ice President
Sen io r V ice Presiden t
Sen io r Vice Presiden t
Sen ior Vice Presiden t
Senior V ice Presiden t/Corporate Secretary
Vice Preside nt
V ice President
V ice President
Vice President
Vice President
V ice President
Vice Presiden t
Vice President
Vice Preside nt
V ice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
V ice Presiden t
Vice President
Vice Pre sident
Vice President
V ice Presiden t
Vice President
Vice President
Vice Presiden t
Empl oyee Name
Nathan J. Beil**
Christopher J. Griffith* *
Christine Y. Koski
G. Scott L ang
Charles A. Phillips Jr**
Garl and Galm
Brya n Lawson
Gary Mryncza
Bi11 Roberts
Daniel Scott Riddle **
Barry S choch
Bay ne E. Smith
Laurie Are nsdorf
Robert Atkinso n
Nicholas Barrick
Stephanie Barr ows
Kathy Berek
Peter Bou rne
Deborah Boyd
Mehmet Boz
Michael W. Burcham
Eric Burgess
Steven Cum or
Shawn D av is
James Deriu
David J. Eberspeaker
James Fitz Morris
Erick Fry
A dam Gardn er
K yle Gass
James M. Gellenthin
Dawn Green
Larry Grego ry
Date of Current Office
12/14/2021
06/10/2021
06/07/2022
10/21/2016
12/14/2021
11/29/2021
12/15/2017
10/21/2016
12/14/2021
10/18/2019
10/31/2017
12/15/2017
05/19/2015
08/21/2018
12/15/2020
12/14/2021
I2/14/2021
08/21/2018
12/13/2016
06/19/2018
06/03/2014
06/06/2017
10/17/2016
12/14/2021
10/17/2016
05/19/2015
06/06/2017
12/12/2017
10/17/2016
11/29/2021
02/09/2015
11/29/2021
10/17/2016
B usiness Address
936 Ridgebro ok R oad, Sp arks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebr ook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Ro ad, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook R oad, Sparks, MD 21152
115501H-10 West, Suite 395, San Antonio, TX 78230
4041 Crescent Park Dri ve, Tampa, FL 33578
500 11t h Avenue North, S uite 290, Nashville, TN 37203
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
5001 Lo uise Drive, Suite 201, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
2160 S atellite B oulevard, Suite 130, Duluth, GA 30097
4505 Falls of Ne use Road, Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
3014 S outhcross Boul evard, Ro ck Hill , SC 29730
11830 West Market Place, Suite F, Fulton, MD 20759
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
11900 West Parmer Lane, Suite 105, Cedar Park, TX 78613
1352 Marrows Road, Ste. 100, Newark, DE 1971 ]
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
1352 Marrows Road, S uite 100, Newark, DE 19711
3014 So uthcross Boulevard, Rock Hill SC 29730
936 Ridgebrook Road , Sparks, MD 21152
3014 S outhcross Bo ulevard, Rock Hill , SC 29730
936 Ridgebrook R oad, Sparks, MD 21152
3014 So uthcross B oulevard, R ock Hill, SC 29730
9711 S outhern Pine Bo ulevard, Suite A, Charlotte NC 28273
2160 Satellite Boulevard, Suite 130, Dul uth, GA 30097
936 Ridgebr ook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
11550 11 1-10 West, Suite 395, San Antonio, TX 78230
4505 Falls of Neuse Road, S uite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
11550 IH-10 West, Suite 395, San Antonio, TX 78230
2160 Satellite Boulevard, Suite 130, Duluth, GA 30097
KCI HOLDIN GS, INC./ KCI TECHN OLOGIES, INC.
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS - 2022
Title
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice Presiden t
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice Presiden t
Vice Preside nt
V ice President
Vice President
V ice President
Vice President
V ice Presiden t
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Vice President
Senior Associate & Assistant Secretary
D irecto r
Director
Director
Director
Director
State of In corporatio n: D elaware
FEIN #52-1604386
Date of Incorporation: 12/15/88
R ev ised 06/07/2022
Employee Name
Date of C urrent Office Business Address
Heidi Hammel 12/10/2019
Wes Hulsey 6/26/2020
J oel S. Keels 10/30/2007
Dana Knight 02/06/2018
Jim Lofft 12/10/2019
Robert M acoy 10/17/2016
Susan Miller 10/17/2016
Arch N oha 08/21/2018
Ge orge Peck 11/29/2021
George Perdikakis 05/26/2009
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr . 12/15/2000
Liz Phipps 10/17/2016
Randell Prescott 12/10/2019
Kerry B. Rexr oad 03/22/1996
Adam Rickey 08/21/2018
Jea nne Ruthl off 02/23/2021
Randy Sea ver 12/15/2020
James H. Shumaker 12/15/2000
Andrew Smith 02/06/2018
Scott Stockburger 10/17/2016
John Walsh 12/14/2021
Mary C. Wiedorfer 12/17/2013
K halil Zaied 02/06/2018
Bru ce Reed 02/07/2019
Holly Painter** 12/14/2021
K enneth H. Trout* * 03/02/1999
William Jews* * 12/15/2009
Barrie Beasley** I2/10/2019
Courtn ey Beam on* * 12/10/2019
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks , MD 21152
106 Clair Drive, Piedmo nt, SC 29673
936 Ridgebr ook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebr ook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebr ook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
5301 Nottingham Drive, Suite 110 , White Marsh, MD 21162
115501H-10 West, S uite 395, Sa n Anto nio, TX 78230
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
300 2"d Street North, Suite 350, La Crosse, WI 54601
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400, Raleigh, NC 27609
4041 Cresce nt Park Drive, Tampa, FL 33578
936 Ridgebrook Road , Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Ro ad, Sparks, MD 21152
2610 Rochester Road, Cra nberry Tow nship, PA 16066
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks , MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
5021 Lakawa na Street, S uite 501 , Dallas, TX 75247
9711 S outhern Pine Boulevard, Suite A, Charlotte, NC 28273
122 C Street, NW, Suite 500, Washingto n, DC 20001
936 Ridgebro ok R oad Sparks, MD 21152
1425 W Cypress Creek Rd, Suite 101, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33309
2160 Satellite Boulevard, S uite 130, Duluth, GA 30097
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook R oad, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
936 Ridgebrook Road, Sparks, MD 21152
** Member of the Board of Directors
010428
Local Business Tax Receipt
Miami -Dade Co unty, State of Florida
-THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY
7275887
BUSINE SS NAMEJIACARON
M OSHIER MARK JAMES PE
5835 BLUE LAGOON DR UNIT 303
MIA MI FL 33126
O WNER
MOSHIER MARK JAMES PE
C/0 Ka TECHNOLOGIES INC
1
RECEIPT NO.
RENEW AL
7564047
SEC. TYPE OF BUSINE85
212 PR OFESSIONAL
PE32016
LBT
EXPIRES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Must be displayed at pla ce of business
Pursu ant to C ounty Code
Chapt er 8A - Art 9 & 10
PAYMENT HECENED
BYTAX COLLECTOR
$100 .00 07/21/2021
INT-21--349197
This Local Business Ta x Receipt only confirms payment of the Local nosiness Tax. The Receipt is nota license,
p ermit. or a certification Mae holder's qualific ations, to do business . Nold ermast comply with a ny government al
or nongovernmental regulatory laws and require ments which apply to the business.
The RECEIPT N0. above must be displayed on all commercial vehicles - Miami -Dade Code Sec 8a-276.
For mere irdormation,vislt www.miamidade,guvftax roll ector
010427
Local Business Ta x Receipt
Miami -Dade County, State of Florida
-THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY
7275885
BUSINESS N AMEILOCATION
KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC
5835 BLUE LAGOON DR UNIT 303
MIAM I FL 33126
OWNER
KCI TECHNOLOGIES INC
Employe e(s) 9
RECEIPT NO .
RENEWAL
7564045
r
J�LBT
1
EXPIRES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2022
Must be displayed at place of busin ess
Pursu ant to County Code
Chapt er 8A - Art 9 & 10
SET -TYPE OF BUSINESS
212 PAJCORP/PARTNERSHIP/FIRM
CA48913
PAYMENTRECE8YEO
BY TAX COLLECTOR
$75.00 07/21/2021
INT-21-349197
This Local Business Tax Receipt only co nfirms payment of the Local Business Tax. The Receipt is note license,
permit, oracertification of Ore ho lder's qualific ations, to do business . lfoldermust comply with any governmental
or nongovernmenta l re gulatory laws and requirements which apply to the husioess .
The RECEIPT N0. above must he displaye d on all commercial vehicles - Miami -Dade Code Sec Ra-276.
for more intomra tion, visit www. mia rrridade. govltaxcollector
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION
PROPOSED DEBARMENT AND OTHER MATTERS OF
RESPONSIBILITY
1. The Proposer certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that the Proposer and/or any of its
Principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible
for the award of contracts by any Federal agency.
B. Have not, within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection
with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract
or subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of
offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property; and
C. Are not presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a
governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph 1-B
of this provision.
2. The Proposer has not, within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts
terminated for default by any City, State or Federal agency.
A. "Principals," for the purposes of this certification, means officers; directors; owners;
partners; and, persons having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a
business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a subsidiary, division, or
business segment, and similar positions). This Certification Concerns a Matter Within the
Jurisdiction of an Agency of the United States and the Making of a False, Fictitious, or
Fraudulent Certification May Render the Maker Subject to Prosecution Under Section 1001,
Title 18, United States Code.
B. The Proposer shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any
time prior to contract award, the Proposer learns that its certification was erroneous when
submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
C. A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not
necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the
certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Proposer's
responsibility. Failure of the Proposer to furnish a certification or provide such additional
information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Proposer non-
responsive.
19
D. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a
system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph
(a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of a Proposer is not required to exceed
that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
dealings.
E. The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon
which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Proposer
knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to
the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this
solicitation for default.
AS THE PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE STATEMENT, I CERTIFY THAT THIS FIRM COMPLIES
FULLY WITH THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.
Signature
Printed Name Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
20
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
RFP NO. 22-0912200
DRUG -FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION FORM
Whenever two (2) or more bids/proposals, which are equal with respect to price, quality, and
service, are received by the CITY OF OPA-LOCKA for the procurement of commodities or contractual
services, a bid/proposal received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug -free
workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. In order to have a drug -free
workplace program, a business shall:
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession or use of controlled substances is prohibited in the workplace and
specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug -free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for
drug abuse violations,
3. Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services that are
under bid a copy of the statement specified in number (1).
4. In the statement specified in number (1), notify the employees that as a condition for
working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will
abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction on or plea
of guilty or no contest to any violation of Chapter 893, Florida Statutes or of any controlled
substance law of the United States or any singular state, for a violation occurring in the
workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction.
5. Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or
rehabilitation program if such is available in the employee's community by any employee
who is so convicted.
6. Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through
implementation of Section 287.087, Florida Statutes.
This Certification is submitted by Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL the
Vice President of KCI Technologies, Inc. (Name)
(Title/Position) (Company)
who does hereby certify that said Company has implemented a drug -free workplace program, which
meets the requirements of Section 287.087, Florida Statutes, which are identified in numbers (1)
through (6) above.
21
09/19/2022
Date
Signature
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA
NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA - COUNTY OF MIAMI DADE
Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
being first duly sworn, deposes and says that:
(1) He/She/They is/are the Officer
(Owner, Partner, Officer, Representative or Agent) of
KCI Technologies, Inc. the PROPONENT that has submitted the attached
proposal;
(2) He/She/They is/are fully informed respecting the preparation and contents of the
attached Proposal and of all pertinent circumstances respecting such Proposal;
(3) Such Proposal is genuine and is not a collusive or sham Proposal;
(4) Neither the said PROPONENT nor any of its officers, partners, owners, agents,
representatives, employees or parties in interest, including this affiant, have in any way
colluded, conspired, connived or agreed, directly or indirectly, with any other
PROPONENT, firm, or person to submit a collusive or sham Proposal in connection with
the Work for which the attached Proposal has been submitted; or to refrain from
Proposing in connection with such Work; or have in any manner, directly or indirectly,
sought by agreement or collusion, or communication, or conference with any
PROPONENT, firm, or person to fix any overhead, profit, or cost elements of the Proposal
or of any other PROPONENT, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost elements of the
Proposed Price or the Proposed Price of any other PROPONENT, or to secure through any
collusion, conspiracy, connivance, or unlawful agreement any advantage against
(Recipient), or any person interested in the proposed Work;
(5) The price or prices quoted in the attached Proposal are fair and proper and are not
tainted by any collusion, conspiracy, connivance, or unlawful agreement on the part of
the PROPONENT or any other of its agents, representatives, owners, employees or parties
of interest, including this affiant.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of:
By: -1'/.Q.c. .
Witness Signature
Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL - Vice President
Witness Print Name and Title
22
NON-DISCRIMINATION AFFIDAVIT
I, the undersigned, hereby duly sworn, depose and say that the organization, business or
entity represented herein shall not discriminate against any person in its operations, activities or
delivery of services under any agreement it enters into with the City of Opa-locka. The same shall
affirmatively comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state and local equal employment
laws and shall not engage in or commit any discriminatory practice against any person based on
race, age, religion, color, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, marital status, physical or
mental disability, political affiliation or any other factor which cannot be lawfully used as a basis for
service delivery.
Sworn and subscribed before this
7th day of September 20 22
Notary Public, State of Florida
Tobi R. Burton
(Printed Name)
My commission expires: March 1 1, 2024
By: Heidi L Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
Title: Vice President
so
'`"4s TOBI BURTON
MY COMMISSION # GG 930804
b�: EXPIRES: March 1162024 A•:t°"' Bonded nw Nofaiy P th undeiwrMers
23
E -VERIFY
Effective January 1, 2021, public and private employers, contractors and subcontractors will be
required to register with, and use of the E -verify system in order to verify the work authorization
status of all newly hired employees. Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees to
utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System to verify the employment
eligibility of:
a) All persons employed by Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform employment duties within
Florida during the term of the contract; and
b) All persons (including sub-vendors/sub-contractors) assigned by Vendor /Consultant/
Contractor to perform work pursuant to the contract with the Department. The Vendor
/Consultant/ Contractor acknowledges and agrees that use of the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security's E -Verify System during the term of the contract is a condition of the contract with the
City; and
By entering into a Contract, the Contractor becomes obligated to comply with the provisions of Section
448.095, Fla. Stat., "Employment Eligibility," as amended from time to time. This includes but is not
limited to utilization of the E -Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired
employees, and requiring all subcontractors to provide an affidavit attesting that the subcontractor
does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with, an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall
maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of the contract. Failure to comply will lead to
termination of this Contract, or if a subcontractor knowingly violates the statute, the subcontract must
be terminated immediately. If t contract is terminated for a violation of the statute by the Contractor,
the Contractor may not be awarded a public contract for a period of 1 year after the date of
termination. The Contractor acknowledges it is liable to the City for any additional costs as a result
of termination of the contract due to Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions herein.
24
E -VERIFY FORM
Definitions:
"Contractor" means a person or entity that has entered or is attempting to enter into a contract with
a public employer to provide labor, supplies, or services to such employer in exchange for salary,
wages, or other remuneration.
"Subcontractor" means a person or entity that provides labor, supplies, or services to or for a
contractor or another subcontractor in exchange for salary, wages, or other remuneration.
Effective January 1, 2021, public and private employers, contractors and subcontractors will begin
required registration with, and use of the E -verify system in order to verify the work authorization
status of all newly hired employees. Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees to
utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System to verify the employment
eligibility of:
a) All persons employed by Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform employment duties
within Florida during the term of the contract; and
b) All persons (including sub-vendors/subcompanies/subcontractors) assigned by
Vendor/Consultant/Contractor to perform work pursuant to the contract with the
Department. The Vendor/Consultant/Contractor acknowledges and agrees that use of the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E -Verify System during the term of the contract is a
condition of the contract with the City of Opa-locka; and
Should vendor become successful Contractor awarded for the above -named project, by entering
into this Contract, the Contractor becomes obligated to comply with the provisions of Section
448.095, Fla. Stat., "Employment Eligibility," as amended from time to time. This includes but is not
limited to utilization of the E -Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired
employees, and requiring all subcontractors to provide an affidavit attesting that the subcontractor
does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with, an unauthorized alien. The contractor shall
maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of the contract. Failure to comply will lead to
termination of this Contract, or if a subcontractor knowingly violates the statute, the subcontract
must be terminated immediately. If this contract is terminated for a violation of the statute by the
Contractor, the Contractor may not be awarded a public contract for a period of 1 year after the date
of termination.
Company Name: KCI Technologies, Inc.
Authorized Signature: �' ` ' •-/
Print Name: Heidi Hammel, GISP, PMP, ITIL
Title: Vice President
Date: 09/19/2022
25
KCI
TECHNOLOGIES
1425 W Cypress Creek Road
Suite 101
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309