The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About03 June 16, 2003 Technical AdvisoryRECORDS TIME: DATE: LOCATION: TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMIT1 MEETING AGENDA* 10:00 A.M. June 16, 2003 &2L 00 Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside Conference Room A, 3rd Floor *By request, agenda and minutes may be available in alternative format; i.e. large print, tape. COMMITTEE MEMBERS John Andoh, PVVTA Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of Blythe Dick Cromwell, SunLine Transit Louis Flores, Caltrans District 08 Mike Gow, City of Hemet Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert Terry Hagen, City of Desert Hot Springs Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula George Johnson, County of Riverside Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta Elroy Kiepke, City of Calimesa Eldon Lee, City of Coachella John Licata, City of Corona Amir Modarressi, City of Indio Bob Mohler, City of Palm Springs Habib Motlagh, Cities of Perris, San Jacinto, Canyon Lake Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Ray 0' Donnell, City of Lake Elsinore Kahono Oei, City of Banning Anne Palatino, RTA Juan Perez, County of Riverside Joe Schenk, City of Norco Ken Seumalo, City of Murrieta Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG Allyn Waggle, CVAG Tim Wassil, City of Indian Wells John Wilder, City of Beaumont Cathy Bechtel, Director Transportation Planning & Policy Development it.3�.Z RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRAM NSPORTA TION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. TIME: 10:00 A.M. DATE: June 16, 2003 LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside Conference Room A, 3rd Floor In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Commission meeting, please contact the clerk of the Commission at (909) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SELF -INTRODUCTION 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — April 21, 2003 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS (This is for comments on items not listed on the agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5. AB1012 — OBLIGATION PLAN FFY03 (Attachment) OBLIGATIONS FOR REMAINDER OF FFY03 6. STIP UPDATE (Attachment) - MAY CTC MEETING - LOCAL AGENCY STIP PROJECTS — ALTERNATIVE FUNDING - 2003/04 ALLOCATION PLAN Technical Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2003 Page Two 7. CETAP UPDATE (Attachment) 8. 2004 AIR QUALITY MAANAGEMENT PLAN — TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE (TCM) APPENDIX (Attachment) 9. RTIP/FTIP UPDATE (Attachment) AMENDMENT 04 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 10. QUARTERLY MILESTONE REPORTS 11. JUNE 11, 2003 COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS 12. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT (The next meeting will be July 21, 2003 in Banning.) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, April 21, 2003 1. Call to Order The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 a.m., at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Riverside County Regional Complex, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. 2. Self -Introductions Members Present: Others Present: John Andoh, PVVTA Bondie Baker, City of Indian Wells Bill Bayne, City of Cathedral City Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bill Brunet, City of Blythe Louis Flores, Caltrans Mike Gow, City of Hemet Mark Greenwood, City of Palm Desert Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Bill Hughes, City of Temecula George Johnson, County of Riverside Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta Eldon Lee, City of Coachella Cis Leroy, SunLine John Licata, City of Corona Bob Mohler, City of Palm Springs Habib Motlagh, Cities of Perris, San Jacinto, Canyon Lake Craig Neustaedter, City of Moreno Valley Kahono Oei, City of Banning Anne Palatino, RTA Juan Perez, County of Riverside Mehran Sepouri, City of Indio Ken Seumalo, City of Murrieta Dale West, WRCOG Cathy Bechtel, RCTC Shirley Gooding, RCTC Eric Haley, RCTC Shirley Medina, RCTC Jerry Rivera, RCTC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 21, 2003 Page 2 3. Approval of Minutes M/S/C (Harry/Licata) approve the minutes dated March 24, 2003. 4. Public Comments There were no public comments. 5. 2002 STIP UPDATE Shirley Medina, RCTC, reported that at the March CTC meeting it was decided to allocate $1 .8B to cover January, 2003 to June, 2004 with 3 separate allocation plans that would occur sequentially. $600M was available for the first 6 -month allocation plan, of which $400M was allocated for the SHOPP program, $200M for STIP projects state-wide. She drew attention to the Draft STIP Allocation Plan for FY 2002-03, which indicates qualifying projects to receive an allocation vote from the CTC. Cathy Bechtel, RCTC, said that the CTC programmed all of the $600M of STIP funds up front in the first phase so that all of the capacity- enhancing projects could be fully programmed, all of which were the already identified projects. She conveyed the concern that no more STIP funds will be available for 03/04. The CTC has identified the balance of funds available will be used for SHOPP projects. Eric Haley, RCTC, reported that the CTC funded the 1-210 project in San Bernardino County. He further stated that the CTC and Caltrans are committed to the 60/91/215 interchange project and they are likely to use any funds from SHOPP projects that don't meet time schedules or from other STIP projects, and that they will likely be severe in cutting off funding of projects that don't meet their schedules. Cathy Bechtel recapped by indicating that funding will be pursued for the 60/91/215 interchange as a priority at the direction of the RCTC Commission. She stated that a request for funds for that project will be made at the May CTC meeting, $50M which is needed in the 03/04 year and the balance will be obtained through a GARVEE Bond. She further stated that no funds for local projects in 03/04 should be anticipated. She emphasized the need to review the STIP item in the April 21, 2003 agenda to determine what should be done with each agency's STIP projects and although no funding will be allotted, it is imperative that all schedules be met just as though funding is available. Ms. Medina explained that RCTC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 21, 2003 Page 3 will keep a spreadsheet of projects, noting which preferred option each agency has chosen to implement their project (substitute or swap funds). She further explained that the June 1, 2003 deadline to notify RCTC of preferred options should be disregarded and that letters tailored for each agency will be sent to city managers. Mr. Haley specified that a total of $236M and $50M on a cash flow basis is being requested for the 60/91/215 interchange project in the first year, and $184M will be GARVEE'D. He added that on the federal side, TEA 3 is not likely to result in a call for projects by RCTC. Shirley Medina reported that STIP extensions going forward include the City of Palm Springs on their allocation of PS&E for projects on Gene Autry and Indian, as well as the City of Desert Hot Springs for Pierson Road. 6. CETAP UPDATE Cathy Bechtel stated that a letter was sent to the County of Riverside from the cities of Moreno Valley, Riverside, Corona and Norco requesting that a new alternative be studied on the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore corridor. She further stated that a formal request has not been made of RCTC but more discussion is expected. There is a meeting coordinated by Supervisor Buster's staff on Wednesday night, April 23, with residents of Victoria Grove, a new housing community that could be affected if the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore alternative is along the Cajalco El Sobronte area. She reported that on the Winchester to Temecula corridor, she received a letter of concurrence from the Army Corps of Engineers on the hybrid alternative, which identifies improvements along 1-15 and 215. She said that although verbal concurrence has been given by the EPA and Fish and wildlife, letters are forthcoming and it is expected that a decision on that corridor will be made in August. On the Orange County to Riverside County corridor, OCTA and RCTC are jointly drafting a request for proposal for a major investment study. OCTA is taking the lead. An in-house team meeting is scheduled today to plan the schedule for the Moreno Valley to -San Bernardino County corridor. She stated that the RCTC Commission approved starting the CEQA process for that corridor and that staff will prepare a notice of preparation followed by two public meetings sometime in the May timeframe. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 21, 2003 Page 4 7. 2004 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE Shirley Medina stated that the 2004 Regional Transportation Plan is scheduled for adoption by SCAG in April, 2004. She further stated that issues have been raised as to how a conformity finding may be made. 2010 is one of the attainment demonstration dates to show that the emissions budget set by the Air Resource Board and the AQMD can be met. Some of the projects that SCAG has carried over from past RTPs cannot be implemented by 2010 and credit has already been taken for those emissions. Due to improved technology, the emission sensors indicate higher emissions than previously thought. The state budget crisis is also a factor in meeting .conformity. If conformity is not met, federal funds will be discontinued. Ms. Medina pointed out that the SCAQMD executive director, Barry Wallerstein, and the SCAG executive director, Mark Pisano, talked at the April Commission meeting about their efforts to resolve some of the issues regarding pollutants. SB 821 CALL FOR PROJECTS Jerry Rivera, RCTC, announced that applications for next year's SB 821 call for projects have been sent out and that proposals are due May 30, 2003. He solicited representatives from the TAC for the evaluation committee. Dale West, WHCUG, volunteered along with Habib Motlagh, City of Canyon Lake and Bondie Baker, City of Indian Wells, said he will ascertain if his city is submitting a project and if not, he will volunteer. 9. RTIP/FTIP AMENDMENT 03 SUMMARY Shirley Medina pointed out the summary of the amendment that was submitted to SCAG and the schedule. She said that the next RTIP/FTIP amendment will be due to SCAG in June. 10. APRIL 9, 2003 COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Cathy Bechtel pointed out the 1-215 widening to San Bernardino item in the Commission Connection. She indicated that RCTC is moving forward with SANBAG to do the environmental work on that project. LSA is going to do the environmental work and LAN is going to do the design work. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 21, 2003 Page 5 11. OTHER BUSINESS/ANNOUNCEMENTS Shirley Medina announced that the AB1012 obligation plan is being prepared. It is hoped that there will be sufficient time to share the spreadsheet with the TAC before submission to Caltrans on May 1. Cathy Bechtel, RCTC, requested that the TAC keep RCTC staff informed of their members and alternates. Anne Palatino, RTA, extended an invitation to Moreno Valley, Corona, City of Riverside and County of Riverside to a field trip to Los Angeles set up for Friday, May 16 to look at public works types of components. Louis Flores reported that Ray Meijer is retiring April, 2004. He further reported that Ernie Rogers is showing good progress at the Physical Rehabilitation Center in Pomona. He is walking with assistance and expects to be at the rehabilitation location for a couple of months longer. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 11:15 AM. The next meeting is scheduled for May 12, 2003, 10:00 AM, at Riverside County Transportation Commission, Riverside County Regional Complex, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA 92501. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Me + Ina Program Manager AGENDA ITEM 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 16, 2003 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager SUBJECT: AB 1012 — Obligation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: The AB 1012 "Use It or Lose It" policy requires timely usage of the following federal funds: CMAQ, STP, and TEA. AB 1012 stipulates that apportionment balances that are three years old may be withdrawn from projects and reprogrammed to other projects at the discretion of the CTC. Annually, counties are required to submit obligation plans for balances approaching three years. This year, RCTC submitted the obligation plan to Caltrans for Cycle 4 on May 2, 2003. The obligation plan (attached) identifies projects that will be obligated during the time period of May 1, 2003 through September 1, 2003. Given the information provided by local agency staff on the projects listed in the obligation plan, we will meet and exceed our three year -old balance targets for Cycle 4. Fund Balance Obligations (May -Sept 2003) CMAQ $17,623,475 *$61,063,000 STP $ 8,245,411 $23,022,843 TEA $ 1,665,273 $ 2,939,867 *Includes possible advance obligation of SAFETEA CMAQ in the amount of $21 million for the SR 60 HOV lanes from 1-15 to Valley Way. In the event that any of the fund balances are not fully obligated, the CTC allows regional agencies to request a six-month extension to obligate the balance. Obligations for Remainder of Federal Fiscal Year 2003 - Included in this item is a letter from Caltrans indicating that based on the obligation plans received for Cycle 4, the amount of obligations will exceed the obligation capacity for FFY 2003. Caltrans will pay strict attention to how the project's funding is identified in respective RTIP/FTIPs. - Please review the RTIP/FTIP to make sure the amount and funding year is correct. For example, if you plan to obligate a project in FFY '03, the project must be programmed in the FY 2002/03 year and the programmed and obligation amounts must be consistent. Local Assistance Pr s with Federal Funds Pr ojected Obligauons for FFY 2003 (May 1, 2003 through September 1, 20023) ment A Total Project Obligati ons Pro ject No. FTIP Project Location Obligation 5/1/03 thru Lo cal•A enc If A vailable N o. and Description Date (all fund RSTP CMAQ R -TEA Comments Caltrans 354801 SR60 HOV, MF Valley Wy-SBCL Jul -03 $21,000,000 $21,000,000 TEA3 CMAQ Advanced Heme t RIV990708 Park -N -Ride Lot 100 Spaces Aug -03 $331,000 $331,000 Murrieta Riverside County CMLN5956(126) RIV010906 RIV990701 Signal Cal Oaks/Hancock SR60 Valley Way Ramp Recon May -03 Jul -03 $80,000 $211,000 $80,000 $211,000 ,` Riverside County RIV990712 ZEMIE Aug -03 $466,000 $466,000 Univ of Cal - Riverside RIV000101 Biodiesel Pilot Demonstration Aug -03 $100,000 $100,000 Univ of Cal - Riverside RIV000101 Electric Vehicle Charging Aug -03 $75,000 $75,000 Caltrans CM LN-6054(016) 46360 SR60 HOV, Redlnds-60/215 May -03 $31,800,000 $31,800,000 Caltrans 0121D 60/91/215 IC and 215 Corrid or May -03 $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Rancho Mirage RIV52001 Ramon Rd Rehab May -03 $96,000 $96,000 Riverside RIV52001 Rehab various streets Aug -03 $1,421,843 $1,421,843 Riverside County RIV52001 Rehab Limonite Blvd May -03 $1,583,000 $1,583,000 Riverside County STPL5956(97) RIV52001 Recon Gilman Springs Rd May -03 $131,000 $131,000 Riverside County STPL5956(131) RIV52001 Resurface Simpson Rd May -03 $300,000 $300,000 Riverside County STPL5956(143) RIV52001 Rehab Monterey Ave Aug -03 $425,000 $425,000 Riverside County STPL5956(143) RIV52001 Rehab Varner Rd Aug -03 $550,000 $550,000 Riverside County RIV52001 Pavement Rehab Ramon Rd Aug -03 $512,000 $512,000 Riverside County STPL5956(141) RIV52001 Rehab Scott Rd May -03 $434,000 $434,000 Riverside County RIV52000 Rte 74/Sherman Signal Aug -03 $345,000 $345,000 Riverside County 32750 Galena IC Aug -03 $3,660,000 $3,660,000 Temecula RIV030301 ITS Demo SR79 Jul -03 $238,000 $238,000 Caltrans 0121D 60/91/215 IC and 215 Co rridor May -03 $13,327,000 $13,327,000 M oreno Valley RIV62046 Aqueduct Bike Trail May -03 $1,025,571 $1,025,571 Murrieta STPLER5454(19) RIV62046 Landscaping Murrieta HS Rd M ay -03 $538,000 $538,000 Norco STPLER5394(12) RIV62046 Santa Ana River Trail Jun -03 $364,174 $364,174 Perris STPLER5198(9) RIV62046 Sante Fe Depot Restoration Aug -03 $298,571 $298,571 Riverside RIV62046 Victoria Pkwy Restoration May -03 $511,571 $511,571 Blythe RIV62046 Hobsonway Arteria l Impro v. Jun -03 $202,000 $202,000 $87,025,730 $23,022,843 $61,063.000 $2.939.887 2003 Obligation Plan. May -Sep 03 8 x 11 version.xls 6/10/2003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA —BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Govemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF LOCAL ASSISTANCE, MS 1 1120 N STREET '. O. BOX 942874 SACRAMENTO, CA 94274-0001 PHONE (916) 653-1776 FAX (916) 654-2409 May 20, 2003 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCIES LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONS Dear Executive Directors: Flex your power! Be energy efficient! 64330 CB / SM r-c-VEC INIER MAY 27 2003 TRANSRIVERSIDE ATIOIN COMMISSION Subject: Federal Obligations for the Remainder of Federal Fiscal Year 2003 Thank you for submittal of your Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2003 Obligation Plans for Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), and Regional Transportation Enhancement Activities (RTEA) funds. The early submittal allows us to determine the amount of Obligation Authority (OA) that the regions intend to use for the remainder of this FFY. Based on our review of all the obligation plans, it appears that the $904 million of OA available in FFY 2003 for local projects will be fully utilized. In fact, an additional $100 million in projects may need to be held pending the August Redistribution of OA from other states. Our review also indicates that several regions plan to obligate projects as late as September 30, 2003. Please be aware that the California Department of Transportation's (Department) cutoff date for submittal to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is expected to be September 5. Therefore, we are requesting that your agencies work with their respective District Local Area Engineer (DLAE) to determine the exact date .that allows enough time for district and headquarter action to meet the FHWA deadline. We also ask that you ensure that projects identified in your obligation plan are in the correct year, phase, and dollar amount in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program, or an amendment will need to be processed prior to obligation. While we will make every effort to accommodate all requests submitted on time and with a complete pa cka e please be aware that this year" t ri i stf�' ,�Itthe�) �parttr en v;#fI pao l: r ygplr a statewide pool. - Projects are -on a first -come e 'bas s s outlined in Chapter 2 of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines Please contact your DLAE if you need information on your current apportionment and OA balances. "Caltrans improves mobility across California*" Metropolitan Planning Organizations Regional Transportation Planning Agencies Local Transportation Commissions May 20, 2003 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Norma Ortega at (916) 654-6841 or your DLAE. Sincerely, c39,Q3F-- TERRY L. ABBOTT Chief Division of Local Assistance c: Deputy District Directors for Local Assistance District Local Assistance Engineers Bob Sertich, Budgets Randy Steen, Budgets AGENDA ITEM 6 L RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: rJune 16, 2003 TO: Technical Advisory Committee Shirley Medina, Program Manager FROM: SUBJECT: STIP Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. BACKGROUND: May 21-22, 2003 California Transportation Commission (CTC) Meeting — As mentioned at our previous TAC meeting, the allocation request for the 60/91/215 Interchange and corridor project and GARVEE Bond Request was included on the May CTC agenda as a Notice with the action expected at the June 25-26, 2003 CTC meeting. A delegation of elected officials and partner agencies attended the May CTC meeting in support of our project. Those in attendance were Supervisors John Tavaglioni, Bob Buster, and Marion Ashley. RCTC Commissioners included Ron Roberts and Robin Lowe. The UCR vice -Chancellor, also attended and addressed the CTC. From staffs' perspective, the chance of the project receiving an allocation vote next month is good. However, it is a chance. At the April 2003 CTC meeting, the CTC committed to fund FY 02/03 projects from the allocation plan that were capacity enhancing, planning, programming and monitoring, and projects at risk of losing funds. The 60/91/215 IC project is not on the FY 02/03 allocation plan. Therefore, if the CTC votes for the interchange project next month it would mean delaying other projects slated for a vote in June, or a vote might occur contingent upon failed delivery of other STIP projects. On a lighter note, RCTC's Executive Director, Eric Haley, received a TRANNY award the evening of May 21, 2003. Eric received the honorary award of "Person of the Year" for his outstanding achievement in leading the Measure "A" Extension campaign. RCTC was also presented a special award for our Measure A Extension approval — the only county that succeeded in the November 2002 elections. The Commissioners that were in attendance at the CTC meeting also attended the award ceremony with other distinguished recipients of transportation awards including Assemblyman Todd Spitzer who received the "Elected Official of the Year" award for his leadership in the OCTA buy-out of the 91 toll road. FY 2003/04 Allocation Plan — A workshop will be held in Sacramento on June 11, 2003 to discuss the 2.003/04 Allocation Plan. This will be a very important meeting because the CTC has not stated how they plan to develop the 2003/04 allocation plan in relation to unallocated 2002/03 projects. Further, the STIP and SHOPP are in competition for very limited resources. Staff will attend the workshop and report the outcome at the June TAC meeting. STIP Project Funding Alternatives — Due to the State budget crisis and its impact on the STIP, projects will be significantly delayed as the STIP revenues have decreased over the past year. With not enough funds available to allocate to all projects programmed in fiscal year 2002/03, a long list of projects are "pending". With FY 2003/04 rapidly approaching, the list of pending projects will grow even longer. In order to meet established schedules for implementing our locally committed STIP projects, RCTC has opted not to have a cal! for projects for future federal funds (SAFETEA). SAFETEA is the next federal transportation act that will cover six years (2003/04 through 2008/09) of transportation funding and it is anticipated that it will be enacted by Spring 2004. Lead agencies were requested to notify RCTC of their preferred option to continue implementing their STIP project(s) by June 15, 2003. The options are as follows: 1) Trade STIP funds for future TEA -21 reauthorization funds (Surface Transportation Program) in the same amount of the current project(s) identified in the STIP. The project will need to be amended in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) which would take approximately four months from the time it is submitted to SCAG for federal approval. 2) Locally fund the STIP projects and substitute another project(s) for the same amount with TEA -21 reauthorization funds. Project substitutions will need to be programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). If the substitute project is a capacity expansion, it will be included in the 2004 FTIP. Anticipated approval of the 2004 FTIP is Fall 2004. If the project is a non -capacity project, then an amendment to the FTIP could take place in approximately four months from the time it is submitted to SCAG for federal approval. 3) Locally fund the STIP project and substitute another project(s) for the same amount in a future STIP. It is likely that programming capacity will be available in the 2007/08 fiscal year and beyond. The same FTIP requirements as mentioned above will be necessary. Each option would allow the STIP funds to lapse and return to Riverside County's STIP share available for programming by RCTC in fiscal year 2007/08. If a local agency does not choose any of the above options, they may continue to keep their project in the STIP; however, RCTC and the local agency will have no control over the timing of allocations by the CTC. Streets and Highways Committee June 12, 2003 Item #1 FY 2003-04 STIP Allocation Plan Priorities and Criteria This item will include a report from the Workshop on FY 2003-04 Transportation Issues to be held on June 11, 2003. That workshop will include staff from the Commission, the Department, and regional agencies. Attached is a spreadsheet identifying all STIP projects programmed programmed for allocation in FY 2003-04, including projects from FY 2002-03 that have not been allocated. The projects are grouped according to the categories first used for the 2002-03 Allocation Plan, with the following changes: • Programmed GARVEE debt service payment is identified as a new category and placed at the head of the list. • Preconstruction for projects with construction in FY 2003-04 is now listed ahead of construction. • Transportation demand management (TDM, ridesharing) is listed separately. • Unidentified match reserves (RSTP/CMAQ/TEA) are listed separately. The projects that were identified in the 2002-03 Allocation Plan for allocation by June 2003 are identified by shading on this new spreadsheet. Three columns identify particular months associated with each project: (1) the Extension Month, indicating the date to which a project has been granted an extension for allocation, (2) the Pending Month, indicating when the project was delivered and ready for vote, and (3) the Survey Month, the month of delivery indicated in our earlier survey of the Department and regional agencies. SU MMARY OF FY 0.. J4 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con I Extl P end Sur vey Prom Year C omponent C/N Yr Frog County ency Rt e PPNO Pr oject Month1 M onth Month T ot al Prior FY 03 FY 04 R/W C on stl E & P PS&E FY 03004 - Programmed GARVEE D ebt Service 1 C 04 RIP Santa Clara SCVTA loc 409C Rt 880 C oleman, GARVEE debt (02S-60) 1 1,300 0 0 1.300 0 1 .300 0: 0 C 041 RIP Santa Clara SCVTA Ioc 443N Rt 87 HOV North, Jullan-Rt 280, GARVEE debt (02S-60 720 0 0 720 0 720 0 0 C 041 RIP Santa Clara SCVTA 1 loc 4435 Rt 87 HOV, Rt 2E0-Rt 85, GARVEE debt (02S-60) 828 0 0 828 0 828 0 0 I : 2.848 Re-uira. u It(±atton for Pro a Alread Atto ca : 03-04 N 04 RIP Fresno Cattrana 180 89B West Phase planing/89A (6-01) Mar -04 1,8001 0 0 1,870 0 1,8001 0 0 N 04111P Kem Caltrans , 58 258B - 1 Mojave Bypass, rahab to relinquish (/#258) Au. -03 2,8001 0 0 2,800 0 2,800 0 0 N 04 RIP Los An es Caltrans 1 210 2022Y ISan Dimas C -Towne Av, landsca.e'(02 STIP Au. -03 1,500 0 0 1,500 0 1.500 0 0 N 04 RIP Las An ale s - Caltrans 21D 422YI Mitl.atlon /#422 72 STIP Au. -03 1 7151 0 0 1,715 0 1 7161 0 0 N 04 HP NevadaNeCaltrans 267 140Y Truck ee Bypass, landsca Ing (FP9869) Yp - May 03 9001 0 0 900) 01 900 0 0 ,.- N 03 N 03 N 03 N I 04131P _'`31 6,, ,; --.1.3.1-316.,'__ RIP San Diego 'Caltrans,,. 125 831 RIP San Diego - Caltrans :125 832 RIP San Diego SANDAG ioc 74018 Santa Clara ICaltrans 8712204G;'Guadalupe a �e n .c f:I}h 5175 . ,,(aplf,, - ; Norsemitigatton, nr Lemon Grove (02 STIR) School noise mitigation, Mt Miguel HS .RSTP/CMACIITEA M atch (Rt 805 mitigation) . landscaping/220 •B (6,+D2) �° 1{ : .. ,dun +3 Jun-0 � ' Jun 02 _Jun1-03 Aug -031 5 -. 1 §i}D': "^ 2,100 296 1,000 r� 4 ' 0 ' 0 0 0 �' 1 900 2,100 =206 01 �Y 0 0" 0 1.000'1 . r1' 1 2 ,77-17d _ r : 0 1?07 U 0 0 2,100 0 0 : 0 296 ,11 0 0 i.o .r. n 0 N 1 04 N :• - . 03 11P Solano 1Caltrans : 8018273A-I`]�Recon _ , SIP -vvnEii,a .. 5}r allranc .,ini 7011 �:A . - 1 . .J 1 1. , 1 connectors,�Rt 684 mitigati on (8703 vote) 1 e"i'" f- .en..r a -::-, = -"i, . x' .' r, ow ,u ana sviu �u nc�. xx t o7:n; u - .�❑ � a��i} r W - f� ' l9 /t ) n 1. 1 2,0001 � - 20.9031 0 � ..� 0 • '4��v �.. 2,000 _ ' � t} 1 0 ' .D 2,0.001 0 0 `� 'i.'n 0 �. i i 1 I 1 IPro lectsjt ttisk of Lo slnit Federal Disc-etto nary Fun ding. FY 03-04 _I N 03 RIP Ma rin Marin CMA 1 Ioc 320C IManzan#a park end ride, phase 2 Jun -03 311 f 0 311 0 0 311 0 0 N 07 RIP Montere Monterey Co Iocl 1152 Davis Rd, re ace Salinas River bridge (02S-49) Aug -03 130 1 0 0 130 0 0 130 0 N 1 04 RIP Oranee Anaheim Ioc' 4435 Imperial Hwy/BNSF soundwall (State only) 1 Aug -03 -- 2,260 0 0 2,260 0 _ 2,260 0 0 N ' 02 RIP Sierra Siena County loc 1L291 Pearl St Br (HBRR. rnatch)(98S-60)(ext 2-02) ' Sep -03 173' 173 0 0 0 173 0 0 N i 04 RIP Sierra _ Sierra County loc 1L60 Gold Lake Hwy Bridge (HBRR match)(02S-06) Aug -03 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 T 04 RIP Sierra Sierra County I loc 1L60 Gold Lake Hwy Brid a (HBRR match)(02S-06) Dec -03 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 N ! 04 RIP Sierra Sierra County i loc 1L60 Gold Lake Hwy Bridge (HBRR match)(025-06) 1 Apr -04 75 , 3 0 75 0 75 0 0 N 1 071 RIP Sierra Sierra County ! Ioc 3L101 Plumbago Rd Bricge, Kanaka Crk (HBRR)(02S-27) Jan -04 23 - 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 N 1 07 RIP Sierra Sierra County loc 3L102' Port Wine Rd Br, Cedar Grove Ravine (HBRR)(025-2T Jan -04 20 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 N 1 07 RIP Sierra Sierra County ' Ioc 3L103 Port Wine Rd Br, Rock Creek Trib (HBRR)(02S-27) 1 Jun -03 20 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 N 1 07 RIP Sierra Sierra County _ lo c 3L104 Old Fiberboard Rd Br, Little Truckee RN (HBRR)(025-27) 1 Jun -03 21 _ 0' 0 21 0 0 21 0 N '' _ 05 RIP Sisklyou Siskiyou Co ioc 2301 Cottonwood Creek Bridge, HBRR match 1 ?7 13 0 D _ 13 3 0 0 10' N ` 04 RIP Siaklye u Slsklyo u Co Ioc 2304 Shackleford Creek Bridge, HBRR match 7? 103 0 _ 0 103 1 102 0 0 N I 03 RIP Tehama Tehama i Ioc 2142 Tehama Av Br, Tehama SI, HBRR (02S-08A)(ext 5-03) Sep -03 4 0 4 0 _ 4 0 01 0 N 1 06 RIP Tehama Tehama Goon loc 2148 Bowman, Cottonwood Cr HERR (025-66) ?? 43 1 0 0 _ 43 0 0 0 43 N''.'' O N : 06 RIP ;Tehama ai, a" r". a _a 0 - Tehama County i Ioc t7w 2182 ,� r, '. . , _g)',. _.. ;_ Reeds Crk Rd bridge 8C-68, HBRR match (025-66) 1 ,^ fin 3 ??1 , ,, 5 3 211 ' eq 1•,553 0 0 • _-_v 2 01 0; .!,-(57 .77),-75 2 0 N 03 N 03 RIE f0hoina Teham a County Ioc 2183 RIP Tehama Tehama County Ioc 2183 $ 1.67; HBRR ma • : '., -1' ' :Ju0k3 :^ , _ 3- Lake Cal Dr, bridge 8C-167, HBRR match (ext 5-03) 1 Jun -041 1 . * ,_ . 0 1' —cif' 0 . - . 6: 0 11 0 }. ,0 0 • , 0 C ! 04 RIP 'Solana Solano TA loc 5301 Jepson Parkway (1-80 reliever)(025-66) Aug -03 1001 0. 100 0 1001 0 0 0 C _ 04 , RIP Solana 'Solano TA loc 5301 Je pson Parkway (I-80 reliever)(02S-66) , Dec -03 4,650 0 0 4,650 01 4,650 0 • 0 N 04 _4 RIP ,Trinity Trinity County lac 7722' HBRR match, Kettenpom Crk, 5C-124 (02S-55) Aug -03 150 ' 0 0 150 0 150 0 0 C C 04 RIP !Ventura Caltrans 23 11870 Widening, Rt 118 to Rt 101 ($10,500 demo)(02 STIP) . , Aug -03 33,849 0 0 33,849 0 33,849 0 0 1 ! 42,515 - r 1 - 1 - FY 02-03 Plann ing, Programming, an d M onito r no - Nee d Delive ry or Lapse - California Transportation Commission Page 1 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMA RY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) I Co n] Extl Pend Survey I Program Year Co orient C!NI Yr1Pro g Co unty Agenc y Rte PPNO Prolect Mo nth' Month Month 1 Total] Prior FY 03 FY 04 R/W Const E & P PS&E N� 0 'I k d3'RiP N ; •03 N 03. P RIP RIP Ir?'s }r OWIT�� e'I Norte.. 3011 b!'te`LTC . Humboldt Humboldr. CCG Modoc ModGTC'l , + '... 11602F1-....1?lia 2 Da , IPlanning; . 2051,:' 1 _ .1n pr "nfrlgcprag� Y� r � _ ` ,�• ,: A u'7s ? 0's. . >• 110 0 : ' k 62 0 1 26611 1 ?9; T 1101:.. 62 : 4vq rr ,0 , ; " Q 1 ;sir p� _ . i] O. NJ IY } ,; '62 I 'to 0 0 4 0 i ,and mon ring..,:•�.� program nliig; and monitoring": Planning,programming, and monitoring . . I I II I o o -04 and Mo ntt r Alameda PIae1R l�• nI 1 N 04 RIP MTC 2100 'anning, programming, and monitoring 86;I 0 0 86 4 66 Q. 0 N 04 RIP Alameda 'MTC/ACCM A 2100 Planning, programming, and monitoring 1 112,j 01 0. 112 0 112 0 0 N 04 RIP Alp-Ama-Cal 'Alpine LTC A1950 Pla nning, proaramming, and mo nitodna j 55 ' 0 0 55 0 55 0 0 N 04 RIP Alp-Ama-Cal 1Amador LTC , B1950 Planning, proaramming, and monitoring 801! 0! Q 80 0 80 0 0 N 04 RIP Alp-Ama-Cal Calaveras LTC !. C1950 Planning, proaramming, and monitoring 85 1 01 0 85 0 85 0 0 N 04 RIP ]Butte BCAG 1 OL16 Planning, pro gramming, and mo nitoring I 55 ' 01 0 55 0 55 0 0 N 04 RIP Colusa Colusa LTC 1 0L20 Plannlna, programming. and monitorina ! 19 0i 0 19 0 19 0 0 N 1 04 RIP Contra Costa MTC 2118 Planning, programming. and monitoring y 53 , 01 0 53 0 53 0 0 N ! 04 RIP Del Norte Del Norte LTC ° 1 1002P 1 Planning, proaramming, and monitoring 1 i 20 1 01 0 20 0 20 0 0 N 04 RIP El Dorado EDCTC 0L14 1 Planning, pro gramming, and monitoring y ] 12011 01 0 120 0 120 0 0 N 04 RIP Fresno COFCG , 6L01 Planning, programming. and monitoring I 270 01 0 270 0 270 0 0 N 04 RIP Glenn Glenn CTC i OL09 Planning. programming. and monitodna 1 38 ! 01 0 38 0 38 0 '0 N I 04 RIP Humboldt Humboldt COG 2002P Planning, programming. and monitoring 1 152, 0 0 152 0 152 0 0 N 04 RIP Inyo Invo LTC 1010 Planning, programming, and monitoring 117 L 117 0 117 0 0 N _ ' 04 RIP Kern Kem CO G 6L03 Planning, programming; and monitoring i 395 ? 0 0 395 0 395 0 0 N I 04 RIP Kings KCAG 6L04 Planning, programming, and monitoring 100 1 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 N i 04 RIP Lake Lake CCAPC 3002P Planning, pro gramming, and monitoring 1 64 ' 0 0 64 0 64 0 0 717 04 RIP Los Angeles LACMTA 9001 Plannin g, programming, and monitoring j 3.529 0 0 3.529 i 0 3,529 0 0 N 1 04 RIP Madera Madera CTC 6L05 Planning, oroarammina , and monitoring 15111 0 01 151 0 151 0 0 N • 04 RIP Marin 2127 Plannlna. programming, and monitoring 18 ; 0 0' 18 . 0 18 0 0 N ' 04 RIP Mariposa WYWLZa 4957 Planning. progra mming, and monitoring 19 • 0 0 19 0 19 0 0 N 04 RIP M endocino M CO G L4002P Planning, progra mming, and monitoring 288 •' 0 0 288 0 288 0 0 N 04 RIP M erced MCAG 1 5960 IPlanning, pro ara mmina. and monitoring 50 , 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 N 04 RIP Modoc Mo dCTC 1 2051 !Plan nin g, pro ara mming, and monitoring 63 '1 0 0 63 0 63 0 0 N 04 RIP Mono Mono LTC 2003 Planning, proarammina. and monitoring 1 253 0 0 253 0 253 0 0 N 1 04 RIP Monterey TAM C 1185 Planning, programming, and monitoring I 513 , 0 0 513 0 513 0 0 N i 04 RIP Napa M TC j 2130 Planning, programming. and monitoring I 10 1 0 j 0 10 0 10 0 0 N 04 RIP Naoa MTC/Napa TPA 1003E Planning, pro gr amming, and monitoring 1 1 60 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 N 1 04 RIP Nevada Nevada CTC ! 0L83 Planning, programming, and monitoring ! 1 .55 , 0 0 55 0 55 0 0 N 1 04 RIP Orange OCTA : 2132 IPlanning, programming, and monitoring r 3.500 ! 0 0 3,500 0 3,5001 0 0 N 04 RIP Placer TPA Pla cer TPA i OL11 Planning, programming, and monitoring j 40 0 0 40 0 40 0 0 N ! 04 RIP Plumas Plumas CTC 2057 Planning, programming, and monitoring 1 73 1 Q 0 73 0 73 0 0 N 04 RIP Riverside RCTC 9803 Plannin g, proarammin g, and monitoring j 1661 0 0 166 0 166 0 0 N 04 RIP Sacramento SACOG 0L30 Plannlna, proaramming, and monitorina j 2331 0 0 233 0 233 0 0 N 04 RIP San Benito San Benito COG 2043 Planning. programming, and monitoring 34 1 0 0 34 0 34 0 00 N 1 04 RIP San Bernardino SANBA G 1 9811 IPlannin g, oroara mmina, and monitoring ; 632 1 0 0 632 0 632 0 0 N 04 RIP San Dlea o SANDAG 7402 Plannlna, oroarammina. and monitoring_ I 473 0 0 4.73 0 473 0 0 N ' 04 RIP San Francisco M TC/SFCTA 2007 Planning, programming, and monitoring 1 59 , 0 0 59 0 59 0 0 N 1 04 RIP hl 04 RIP San Francisco MTC `. 2131 Plannlna, programming, and monitoring I 46 ! 0 0 46 0 46 0 0 San Joaquin ISJCOG 1 7952 Planning, programming, and monitoring 1 220 0 0 220 0 220 0 0 N N N • 04 RIP San Luis Obispo SLO COG 1 942 Planning, programming, and monitoring ; 300 1 0 0 300 0 300 47 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04 RIP San Mateo MTC 2140 Planning, programming, and monitoring i i 471 0 0 47 0 1 04 IMP Santa Barbara SBCAG 1 919 Planning. nropramrntrng, and monitori ng ! 1 135 i 0 0 135 0 California Tra ^noortatlon Commission Page 2 of 15 6/10/2003 SUM MARY OF FY L_ •04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con J 1 Ext Pend Survey Total I Program Prior gram Year FY 03 FY 04 R/W Component Const E & P( PS&E C/N Yr Proa County A gency Rte PPNo Protect Month Month Month 1 j I N 04 RIP Santa Clara (MTC 2144 Planning, programming. and monitoring J 346 0 0 346 0 346 0 0 N N 04 T 04 RIP 'Santa Clara IMTCISCVTA 2255 Planning, programming, and monitoring _ 861 0 0 861 0 861 0 0 RIP 'Santa Cruz SCCRTC 921 Planning, programming, and monitoring I 76 0 0 r 76 0 76 0 0 N 04 RIP Shasta [Shasta RTPA 2368 Planning, programming, and monitoring 60 0 0 60 _ 0 60 0 0 N 04 RIP 'Sierra Sierra LTC OL04 Plann ing, programming, and monitoring i 128 0 0 128 0 128 0 0' N N 04 RIP Sisklyou Slsklyou LTC 2205 Planning, proarammina. and monitoring I ' 13 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 04 RIP Solano MTC 2152 Planning, proarammino. and monitoring 26 0 0 _ 26 0 26 0 0 N 04 RIP Solana _ - MTC/STA 2263 Planning, programming, and monitoring _ _ 75 0 0 75 0 75 0 0 N _ 04 RIP Sonoma M TC 2156 Planning. programming. and monitoring 31 0 0 31 0 31 0 0 N N 04 04 RIP RIP Sonoma MTC/SCTA 770E Planning, programming, and monitoring - _ 454 0, 0 454 0 454 0 0 Stanlslaus 1StanCOG 9953 Planning, programming, and monitoring - - 299 0 0 299 0 299 0 0 N 04 RIP Sutter �ACOG 1L53 Planning, pro gramming, and monitorina _ 23 0 0 23 0 23 0 0' N 04 RIP Tehama iTeha ma LTC 2083 Planning, pro gramming, and monito ring i 134 0 0 134 0 1.34 0 0 N 04 RIP Trinity 'Trinity CTC 2066 Plannlna, pro gramming, and monitorin a 1 20 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 N 04 RIP Tuolumne TCCAPC 1 —1VCTC 452 Pla nnlna, programming, and mo nitoring 1 84 0 0 84 0 84 0 0 N 04 RIP Ve ntura I 9002 ' M annino, programming, and monitoring 1 313 0 0 313 0 313 0 0 N 04 RIP Yo lo JSACOG OL37 !Planning. programming, and monitorina 28 0 0 28, 0 28 0 0 N 1— 04 RIP Yuba JSACOG _ OL41 [Planning, programming. and monitoring 14 0 0 14, 0 14 0 0 15,783 - - Capacity, Preconstructlon - Construction Scheduled fo r FY 04 C 04 RIP Butte Butte County loc 1L43 Keefer Rd realignment (98S-82)(ext 6-02) Jun -03 Jun -03 70 70 0 0 0 0 0 70 C 1 04 RIP Butte _ Butte County loc 1 L43 Keefer Rd realignme nt (98S-82)(ext 5-03) Jun -04 Dec -03 20 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 C 04 RIP Butte Butte County fog 2L98 Speedway Av extension, Durham -Chico (ext 5-03) Jun -04 Jun -03 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 35 C i 04 RIP Butte Butte County loc 2L98 [-Speedway Av extension, Durham -Chico (ext 5-03) Jun -04 Feb -04 200 0 200 0 200 0 0 0 C 04 RIP Contra Costa BART rail.20110 Pittsburg -Bay Point terminal zone , tumback Mav-03 350 0 350 0 _ 01 0 0 _ 350 C 04 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles _ loc 3090 Widen Tampa Av bridge, LA River Jun -03 243 0 243 0 0 0 0 243 C { 04 RP°Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3093 Soto St bridge over M isslon/Huntington. rep!, widen _ Jun -03 1,341 0 1,341 0 540 0 0 801 C i C 1 04 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3094 Laurel Cvn Rd bridg e over TuJunaa Wash. widen Jun -03 49 0 49 0 0 0 0 491 04 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3095 Vanowe n St bridge. LA River, widen. rehab Jun -03 339 0 339 0 ' 0 0 0 333 C 1 04 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3108 Wlnnetka Av bridge. LA River. widen. rehab J un -03 223 0 223 0 0 0 0 223 C 04 RIP Los Ange les Monte bello loc 2367 Beverly BI. widen (ext 5-02) Feb -04 1 Feb -04 843 'J 843 _ 0' 0 6601 0 0 183 C 04 RIP Los Angeles SGVCOG asap 2318 Alameda Corr East. Ramona BI arade seo (SO) May -03 3;745 0 3,745 0 3,745 0 0 0 C 04 RIP Los Angeles SGVCOG gsep 2318 Alameda Corr East. Temple St train diverslon (SO) May -03 1,76 6 0 1,766 0 1.766 0 0 0 C 04 IIP Solano dCCJPA rail 6045L Bahia viaduct track & bridge upgrade (ITIP) May -03' 190 0 1901 0 0 0 40 150 9,414 1 - Capacity, Cons truction - - C 04 RIP Alameda Ca ltrans 680 A157G Sungl Grade soundwalls (00S-31) (RIP) ?7? 8,717 0 0 8,7171 O1 8,717 01 0 C 04 RIP , 4` Alameda 'Caltrans X88va'"NEie§t' 0 16F 021ST1[P � i': NOV,HOVSCI Co Line-AlvaradofNllas (grf)(025-74) ,' , a , Jun -03 11.8061 ,_. 0 _ 01 11 ,800 ' 1 0 11,800 0 0 C 04 RIP Alameda 'ACE awv 2021 Livermore Valley siding (TCR #26) Jul -03 1,000 ` 0 0! 1,0001 0 1,000 0 0 C 04 RIP Alameda [BART ra il 2103 Oakland Airport connector guideway (RTIP) May -03 15;000 1 0 0 15,000 ' 10000 5,000 0 0 C ' 041RIP Alameda 'BART rail' 2103 Oakland Alrport connector guideway (RTIP) i 7.200 1 0 0 7,200 0 7,250 0' 0 C 04 RIP Alp-Ama-Cal [Caltrans 88 2497 Amador, Pine Grove passing lane (02 STIP) Jul -031 4.91411 0 0 4 1' 914 0 4,914 0 _ 0 C 02 IIP Butte 'Caltrans _ _ _ 149 16W1 Rt 70-Rt 99, new expway (98S-131)(axt 2 -02) j F eb -041 Jun -031 47,6971, 47.697 0 c. or 2.886 44.811 0 0 C 02 RIP Butte 'C altrans : 1491 16W 4 -lane expressway (c ost Incr)(98S-131)(ext 2-02) Feb -041 _ ' Jun -031 6,1241' 6,124 0 0 0 6,1241 0 0 C ' 03 IIP Butte (Ca ltrans i 1491 16W 4 -lane expressway (cost incr)(llP)(ext 2-02) Feb -04 Jun -031 13,3861, 0 13.386 OF 0 13.386 0 0 C 1 03 RIP Butte (Caltrans ' 1491 18W 4 -lane expr essway (cost incr)(RTIP)(axt2-02) Feb -04' Jun -03 7,10011 0 7,100 0 1 0 7,1001 0 0 C ; 041R!P Butte IButte County i loc. _1L43' Keefer Rd realignme nt (98S-82) Apr -04 79211 01 0 792 01 792 0 0 California Transportation Commission Page 3 of 15 6/10/2003 SUM MA RY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con 1 I Exti Pendl Surveyl Program Year Component _ C/N 1 Yr Pro 9 County Agency Rte 1 PPNO I Project Mon thl Month' Month Total Prio ri FY 03 FY 04 R!W Const E & P1 PS&E G 04 RIP Butte Butte Co unty loci 2L98 (Speedway Av extensio n, Durham -Chico Jun -04 235 0 0 235 0 2351 0 0 C 04 HP Contra Co sta Caltra ns 4 192E Loveridge Rd interchange Jun -04 3,000 0 0 3,000 01 3.000 0 0 C 04 HP Contra Costa Caltrans , 801 261F WB HOV, Rt 4 -Carquinez Br, phase 1 (ITIP)(02S-18) Aug -03 17,800 0 0 17,800 0 17,800 0 0 C 1 04 RIP Can Costa Caltrans 80 261F Westbound HO V lanes, Rt 4-Cargylnez Br (RTIP) Au -03 5,000 0 0 5000 0 5,000 0 0 G` ;03�RIP , s $3 0: a R . telrch8 g�!(i]os'-r TIP) . 7 :-` , "W ;g�}`� _0' .=' 3i .2-7: -` ®; ti ='0 C 04 RIP Contra Costa BART ra1112011 D ..y(If Pittsburg -Bay Point terminal zone, turnback Dec 031 1,150 01 0 1,150 D 1,150 01 0 C 02"RIP ' I7elf oit7PF2-, ,. t3sl fort He,! " I75,EIO1$P F y? +f;'1'+ 1-ficswland id'W den(&idR 5-02) - '.. '. Jun -03' '' ` 6 50166 s`{i~` ,'M , 7S ; 7 :"0 •0 C 03' IIP Fresno Caltrans ' 991 1530 . 5i Kingsburg-Selma Slane, Rt 201-Rt43 (TC#90)(025-16) ' Jun -031 35.465 01 35,465' 0 0 35.465 0! 0 C : 04 RIP Fresno Caltrans 1 1801 90F New fwy, Clovis Av-Temperance Mar -04s 36,781 0 0 38,781 0 38,781 0 0 04 IIP Fresno Caltrans rail 2041 Fre sno Pocket Track, Fig Garden siding (02S-79) 11,2891! 0, 0 11,289 0 11,289 0� 0 C , 04 RIP Gle nn Caltra ns 321 928 Re align roadway In Orland (02 STIP) Oct -03: 2,000 0] 0 2,000 0 2,000 01 0 C 04 RIP Humboldt _ Eureka j bush 2101 Replace 3 vehicles _ Aua-03; 6921 0' 0 692 0 692 01 0 C 03 RIP Humboldt Humboldt Co loci 20019 O ld Arcata Rd/M yrtle Av, widen (02S-37) : Aug -03: 5.605 I 0! 5,605 0 800 4,805 0 0 C 04 RIP Humboldt Humboldt TA loci 2002T Vehicle re lacement Aug -03i 261 0 0 261 0 261 0�f0 .tr,� •03 RIP lmperlaf '` . > K •.: :7. -:51 °- ,;. Pxp -g 4-t S 12i'B P{j STIP1'. 11v•-"1 1'.,_._ 25;'_... 111'3121 ' "Q '" 0 233 2 G 03 •HP Imperial Caftra)1s 7 •-6.1.1 :4 -lane expwy; grf, RI 98 - RI 8 (IT[P)(02 STIP) Jun -03 4:052 0 +3,052 0 0 .4;052 0 0 C 03 RIP Imperial Caa brans 78 21 Brawley Bypass, 4 -la ne (RIP)(spllt wfFY05) Jun -03 6,250. 0 6,250 0 .0 ,6 250 0: 0 C - 03 IIP• lmperla[ Ca(trans 78 21 Brawley Bypass, 4. lane (11P)(split w/FY05): . Jun=03 6.250 0 6,250 0 0 6;2517 • 0 0 C 04IRIP . lnyo Caltrans 14 8010 , North of Mojave, expressway upgrade (RTIP,) Mar -04' 3,780 0i 0; 3,7801 0• 3,780 0 0 C 041 RIP 'Kern 1 Caltrans 141 801011 North of Mojave, expressway upgrade (RTIP) Mar -041 15,120 ` 01 01 15,120 0 15,120 0 0 C 04 HP 'Kern Caltrans 141 801011 North of Molave expressway upgrade (ITIP) Ma r -04' 15,120 0 0 15;120 01 15,120 0 0 C 04, R1P Kern �Bakersfleld loci 373111 Fairfax Rd in terchange, widen I Aug -031 15,000 0 15,000E 0' 15,000 0 0 C `` 103 RIP -Ksii ' , fir. - . RL.'-- un - Ioc '8700'-ityretajfr oj ftd; Rt991, Wings• Way 4 -lane , • " Jun=03 2,+185 -0 0`,,, 2,K88g; qt^, -w x a 'r;r2''_2 541 0 R '0 C 04 RIP Lassen (Caltrans 366 3048115usanwille To wn Hill Impro vements (RTIP) ' Jan -041 1.950 0! 0 1,950 0 1,950 _ 0 0 _ _ C 04 IIP ;L assen `Caltrans 361 3048I1Susanville Town Hill improveme nts (ITIP) j Jan -041 1,9501 01 0 1,950 0 1,950 0 0 C 1 04 RIP Lassen .La ssen County : loci 2121 1Skvline Rd corridor Improve ments (02 STIP) ! _ , Aug -031 6.871 1 0 0 6,8711 0 6,871 0' 0 C i 02 RIP Los Angeles ICaltrans 1'. 27J Hughes Terrace -Fiji Way, widen (ext 6-02) ! Feb -04 1 Jan -04.1 6,691 6,691 0 01 0 6,691 0 0 C ! 02 RIP 'Lo s Angeles 1Caltrans 11 27K (Hughes Terrace -Sepulveda. widen (ext 6-02) 1 Feb -04 Jan -041 2,028 2,028 0 01 0 2,028, 0 0 C 02 RIP (Los Angeles Caltrans 1; 27N !Culver Blvd overcrossing, widen (ext 6.02) ' Feb -04 Feb -041 2,792 2,792 0 - 0 0, 2,792 0 0 C 02 RIP (Las Angeles Caltrans 11 27P IBallona Cree k Bridge , widen (ext 6-02) , Feb -04 1 Feb -04! 3,739 1 3,739 0 0 0 3,739 0 0 02 RIP (Los Angeles (Caltrans 1 27Q Jefferson Blvd -Fiji Way, widen (ext 6-02) I Feb -04 Feb -04 2,621 �, 2,621 0 0 0 2,621 0 0 �% s. Los�Rn geles' °e' er,wv4 -47i0--- :wk--s-.0,c,,,,• a ' 1�, i, {:- -' s '; FI -0 �y,4,, . 0 ;� ,:0 q 03 f#, ' Los An leles g s�^ n Ce C• ``' s;' 2120; 4't(esem ', tare G.en _ )$ RIP)(incres0) - .' :lllrt-03 , 2,867 a _ -- -11 2,867. -. * ,0> YD ' =2, 7 ..0 • ". ©' . C 04 RIP I Los Angeles (Caltrans 51 162P 1 HOV lanes Rt 118-Rt 14 (02S•67) i new l 10,210 0 0 10,210 0 10,210 0 0 C 1 04 RIP Los Angeles ICaltrans ' 101 2969 HOV lane, fibre -optic reloc (005-20) 1 ' Jun -041 175 0 0 175 0 175 0 0 C 02 RIP i Los Angeles ICaltrans ! 901 2012A Playa Vista acce ss, Rt 90 (ext 6-02) Feb -04 : Jan -041 7,632 1 7,632 0 0 0 7,632 0 0 C 1 04 RIP !Los Angeles Caltrans i 101! 567P LA St -Center St, SB Improvements (02 STIP) Sep -031 11,043 1 0 0 11,043 0 11,043 0 0 C ' 04 HP 'Los Angeles � 105 Caltrans21191 Widen NB Se ulweda BI off -ram STIP (02 ) P Oct 031 3,621 0 0 3,621 0 3, 0 0 0 •`-03 RIP �L'© s' Angela s? - - , ' , FIa11'ywoirdWa71 ns cii�'IiTTP1 2-.S�TPi3 `. r : _ ` M621 lJt'�n6 ,. 15;179 0 15179 :' 0 =, .t =.151 , (k •rills � � �.. C 03 IIP Los An ele• ., s < ' ' -"_ � 2123, HollywoodHa�lywgod Way intsl;�h�,;Burbank (02 srlla).;• • JUrti,03 13.841 0 13,6"1 0 0 .f3; _6g1- `ill • :'Q C 041 RIP Los Angeles Caltrans 138''1 33291 Widen, Longview Rd 146th St E (RIP)(02S-93), grf Jun -04 5,0001 0 0 5,000 01 5,000' 0 0 C 04 RIP - Los A ngeles Caltra ns 4051 2333i Aux lane , Rt 10 -Waterford (RIP)(025-67)(TCR #52) i I Sep -03 32,56911 0 0 32,569 01 32,569 0 0 _ _ G 0411IP (Los A ngeles Caltrans 4061 23331 Auxlllary lane Rt 10 -Waterford (IIP)(TCR#52) , Sep -03! 7,586 0 0 7.586 i 0 7,586 0 0 C 041RIP 1LosAngeles Caltrans - 4051 2336 Rt 405/101 conn, gap closure (RIP)(02S-67)(TCR #51)1 ' Jun -03i 17,587 0 0 17,5871 0, 17,587. 0 0 C 04111P 03`RIP,r C fl3 .RIP• (Los Angeles Caltrans s 4051 23361 Rt 405/101 conn, gap closure, (02 STIP)(ITIP)(TCR #51) 1 , Jun -031 9,124 + : 33 660 6 52,670 (I 0 t7'' 0 0 3 544 52,670' 9 124 1 0J 9,124 01 0 J ', _ , 0 .: VI - 33.600 0' 0 0 0 52,670 0 0 fi fAtt Los Ariga(s i + p 'TM77"!1` s, ,,: - p n i10496Vr11.r08sari ) 'r - : _ . � t3a{ 8_*:,:k' � _t33`� tiy91);tOV-ari' . 90-RfMSO 1. . .. + 1. Jon i Jun -03 '^ C 041 RIP Las Angeles Baldwin Park bust 289811Buses, "INTO Reporters ' Apr -04i 689:1 01 0 689;1 0 689 01 0 C 041RIP :Lo s An ge les ISGVCOG lgse pi 2318 1Alameda Corr East grade seps (SO)(TCR #54.1) , Jun -03! 9,308 ; 0 0 9,308.1 01 9,308 01 0 C i 02IRIP 1 Los Angeles I Glenda le i °seal 9814.1 Route 134 grade separation (98S-154)(ext 6-02) 1 Feb -04 i Feb -041 16,375 1 16,375 0 0 01 16,375 01 0 California Tr--nortation Commission Page 4 of 15 6/10/2003 SUM MARY OF FY L_ •04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,0005) Con M Ext Pend Survey ] Program Year Com onerrt C/N Yr Proa County Agency ! Rte PPNO Project j Mo nth Month Month I To tal 1 Prio r l FY 03 FY 04 R/W Constt[ E & P1 PS&E C 021RIP Los Angeles LA County ! loc 22711 Hasley Cyn Rd Intercht reconfig(ext 5-02) Dec -031 Dec -03 _ 6,322 6.322, 0 0 0 6,322 0 0 C I 02 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 2366 Arbor Vitae, widen (98S-75)(ext 6-02) Feb -041 Feb -04 1,168 1,168 0 0 0 1.168 0 0 C 04 RIP Los Ange les Montebello loc 2367 Beverfy BI, widen (02 STIP) Aug -03 3,042 j 01 0 3,042 0 3,042 0 0 C 04 RIP Los Angeles Torrance 1 loc 2371 Del Amo BI, gra de sep, widen (00S-40) Feb -04 4,308 01, 0 4,308 0 4,308; 0 0 C 02 RIP Los Anae les Los Angeles 1 loc 2374 Centnela Av, wide n (985-75)(ext 8-02) Feb -04 - Feb -04 2,607 2,6071 0 0 0 2,6071 0 0 C 1 02 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles ! loc 2375 Connect 2nd & Grand Av (985-75)(ext 5-02) i Feb -04 Feb -04 2,022 2,022 0 0 0 2.022 0 0 C 02 RIP Lo s An ales Los Angeles ' lo c 2861 LA St realignment at Alameda St (ext 6-01 1 Feb -04 1 Jun -03 1,369 1 3691 0 0 0 1,389 0 0 ,4atlA ; C , 04 .. IP RIP ,Los - .,4'''::. .: Angeles Litu ]ogle*.r i Los Arl eles loc 8 ,1. 3090 ,o s ;M al 8 l _. fedS �G in rc art % ~: Widen Tampa Av bridge, LA River 5? I 771 `" f. B;�I3 1,131 e 0 J�: " 0 01 01 1,131 ti3 793 0 1,131 0 ` 3"6 0 C 04 RIP , Los Anaele s Los Angeles for 3093 Soto St bridge over Mission/Huntington, reel. widen ' ?? 2,241 0; 01 2,241 _ 0 2,241 0 0 C 04 RIP !Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3094 La ure l Cyn Rd bridge over Tujunga W ash, widen ; ?? 2211 01 --151---2 21 0 221 0 0 0 04 RIP 'Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3095 Va nowen St bridge, LA River, widen, rehab ?? 1,5621 01 01 1,562 0 1,562 0 0 C 04 RIP !Los Angeles 'Los Angeles loc 3096 Co mmercial St, Alame da -Center, widen 7? 9201 01 0 920 , 0, 920 0 0 C 04 RIP :Los Angeles - Los Angeles j loc 3108 Wtnnetka Av bridge, LA River, widen, rehab 77 1,031' 01 0 1,03111 01 1,031 0 0 C 04 RIP I Los Angeles Caltrans 1 rail 2002 DT unction to La Mirada, triple track (TCR #35)Jun-03 5;000 Or 0 5 000 0 5,000 0 0 C ' 03 RIP+- :_ _5 ,. .n `- ``$` `' rA. C 04 RIP 1 Los Angele s SCRRA rail] 3201 t1' s. Ise._.. • 13�::._ g• � " a Rolling stock mtnce facility, San Bernardino (025-11 } Apr -03 889 X89; 6,08011 0 0 5,080 i 0 : 9,, 5,080 tl 0 C 04IRIP ILosAngeles SCRRA rani 3202 ReallgntracksAntelopeValleyLine,LancastertolA ! Dec -03 2,193,1 0� 0 2,1931 0 2,193 0 0 04 RIP Los Los Angeles roll LACM TAran8 3225 Light rail vehicles (02S-67) 1 5,1001 0' 0! 5,100 I 0 5,100 01 0 C 02 RIP C 03 lIP C 03 RIP C 04 RIP C 041119 ' M ann M arin Marin Merced ICaltrans 99 � 10)10)3.'.2+_ Caltrans 101 Caitrans 101 991 5355 342L 342L 547o Oct -03 3,9001 3,9001 01 SR 145 & Ga ,way interch (98S-121)(ext 4-02) Feb -04' I n' NOVNOVlanes'ga rlt3 _ „20 IIIS s 1wlFi' 05 aJti° T;:®0 " '`0 7.:00b? HO.V lanes rap closdre (025-'72)(RIP)(spilt w/FY05) Jun -03 • :6,441 0 6;441 HO lames gap closure (005-72)(96 grf)(split wit=Y05): Jun -03 10;392 ' 0 0, [Fwy conversion, Atwate r OH -A re na Way (02 STIP) Mar -04 28,1931 0 01 0 �tl 10:392 28,193 1 0 �}- 0 •0 1 0 3,400 q OU "8,441 --10,392 28,193. 01 ,,t}a .= 0 0 0, ., 0 0 0 C 04111P Merced ;Caltrans 99 547911TOS components, Atwater OH -Arena Way Mar -04 1,136 11 0 0, 1,136 I 0 1,136 01 0 ' C _ 04 IIP Merced Caltra ns 99 528D Fwy F conversion, Owens Crk Br -Childs ITiP ) F eb -04 27 .288 111 , 01 0' 27,288 0 27,288 01 0 '0 04 RIP Merced Caltrans 1 99 t 5280 F conversio n, Owens Crk Br -Childs RTIP Feb -04 ( i 17,869 ; '1 01 17,869 [ 0 17,869 0 0 C _ 04 IIP Merced ICaltrans 99 528D TOS compo nents, Owens Crk Br -Childs I Feb -04 465 f 0 01 465 0 465 0 0 C 04 IIP Merced ICaltrans I 99 546D Fwy conversion, Arena Way -Dwight Way 1 Jun -03 23x314 1 01 01 23,314 0 23,314 0 0 C 04 IIP Merced ;Caltrans 99 5460 TOS compon ents, Aren a Way -Dwight Way t Jun -03 1,128 1 01 01 1,128 0 1,128' 0 0 C 04 RIP Mono Mono Co bus 2015 Bus for Invo-Mono Transit Feb -03 70 1 Of 0 70 0 70 0- 0 C 04 RIP Mono (in Kern) Ca ltra ns 14 8010 North of Mo jave, expressway upgrade (RTIP) 1 Mar -04 3.780 1 01 0 3,780 0 3,780'- 0' 0 C 03 RIP Monterey Salina s : loc _ 1160 Sanbom Rd, Abbo tt -John, widen i unknown 1,000 i 01 1,000 0 0 1,000 01 0 C ' 04 RIP Napa ,Caltrans 1 29 377C Trancas St interchange (split/377A) ! I Jun -04 639 01 0 639 0 639 0 0 C 04 RIP Orange Caltrans 90 4434 Imperial Hwy grade sep, nr O'tho rpe (985-121) Jun -04 17,030 ! 01 0 17,030 0 17,030 0 0 C 04 RIP Ora nge `Placentia Igsep 9656 Placentia Av grade sep (RTIP)(State only)(TCR #73) Aug -03 2,200x', 0. 0 2,200' 0 2,200 0 0 C 04 RIP Orange 'Placentia 1gsep 9656 Placentia Av grade sep (RT)P)(State only)(TCR #73) I Aug -03 1,100 01 0' 1,100 0 _ 1,100 0 0 C 041 RIP Oran ge ;Irvine C 03 RlP' t�iarer' T1� ' . C 03 II9 Riverside 1 lo ck 9653 r i $ r T4Th Caltrans 1 601 33 Jeffrey Rd grade sep (t 02 STIP) U ! nteici11 Q1 STIP) HOV lanes, Rt 15 -Valley Way (ITIP) Sep -03 <Tun°a-0,3 lt 1 Jun -03 9,354 �-e.'tt7zw 9,785 i 01 0 9,354 ',V-. , 1 0] 9,7851 0 0 - 0a: 0 9 854 , 9,785 0 0 .:!• 0., <ti 0 0 0 1 03 RIP (Riverside Caltrans i 601 33 HOV lanes, Rt 15 -Valley WaL(RTIP) 1 Jun -03 3,261 I 0! 3,261 0 0 3,281 0; 0 C _ _ 04 IIP Riverside I Caltrans . 2151 121D HOV,TGL, El Cerrito- Rt 60/91 (02392)"(IIP) Jun -03 5,300 i 01 01 5,300 0 5,3(!0, 01 0 C ! 04 RIP ,Riverside [Caltrans , 215 121D HO V,TCL, El Cerrito- Rt 60/91 (02S92) '(RIP) 1 Jun -03 29,700 1t"01 0 29,700 0' 29,700 01- . 0 C 04 RIP /Riverside Blythe j Jo e 0C Hobsonway, arterial improvements (02S-39) LJun-03 1,875? 01 0 1,875 0 1,875 0 0 C 1 03 RIP I San Benito I Ho llister Ioc1 852 Sunnyslope Drive widenin (005-4) (unknown] 46611 01 466 r 1 01 466! 0 0 O ... `03. hi ':ST fg Bir 'a`rdlno • . Tt?8ns '" 118:-.'239:1,4 C: 03 RIP , San Bernardino .;Calllrans 210 '1938 C 03 IIP San Bernardino Cel raps 210 1935 C _ 04' RIP :San Bernardino ICaltrans 210; 193S;f At iks . _ . " n' vii -.��r,. �sw-�4 , =de r " ._ ,Itch 3 New fwV LA�Co.Rt215 R P 0 -STIP s 'tit W o4) . Jun -03'a { )( )( p ) New fre eway, LA Co;Rt 215 (ITIP)(O0S-34) Jun -03 New t;,yy, LA Co-Rt 215 (R1P)(02 STIP s 10. w1FY03) ; 1 Apr -04 �.vos g 64x`21 ^ p' 5� 0, ' ' : 0 "87,682' . ': e 2.589 0 2,889 r 19,781:; 0" 01 1 ' 70.:,: . ,5 42is, 0'r 0 57 602 • :., 0 0 0 2,659 0 0 0 1 19,7811 01 0 C 041RIP 1Sen Bernardino ,Caltrans ' 2151 247K11HOV Ins, op Imps, 9th -16th (seg 2) 1 I 1 Jan -04 33,21911 0i 01 3 219 01 33,219 T 0 California Transpo rtation Commission Pag e 5 of 15 6/10/2003 SUM MARY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con Ext Pend! survev1 Program Year Corn anent C/N Yr Proa9 County Agency Rte PPNO Prolect M onth I M onth Mo nth Total Prior FY 03! FY 04} R/W Const E & P1 PS&E �^� { i�r'x-�F�� 4 6501 I 0 i o _ 4,850 0l 0 r C: (! C 04 IP RIP I -,�,. � Sa 'Be. a ino ?tl o San Diego ;Caltrans 51 � ,�.,� tie`s F'or , . t -�{ , � .,,�YI°r.e3y.„2;- Jun -04 _ �c?.aCr�4'O�j 4,850 OF 0 135G Del Mar Hts-Via de la Valle, NB aux In(00S-19) C C` C C C 04 03'99P - . 03 03 RIP !San Diego ;Caltrans ! 15 672 San Diego" Cialran5 rYy : '1� ' IIP San Diego Caltrans - • - 15 -:=233A AP San Diego ,Caltrans 15 233J Ma s Pe a qr- 0 ,5:1 a ay- GI Au1:jr �+f[ia Mar Wira Mesa;B}� _ Northbound lane, Poway Rd -Mercy Rd (02S-51) ;r `F ' Jun -041 1,500 urtf03 7{0; d •'77? - 2;700 - Jun -03 4,000 0 0 ., 470L�. 0. .-2;700' 0 4,000 15001 m a •-..„ r 0 01: 0 ,. . 0 01 1,500 r 2r.. 0. 4,0001 0� .'0y 0 0 0 ;fl,'d•� . 0 0 041 RIP San Diego Caltrans 52 260 Rt 125-Cuyamacs St, 4 -In My' (RTIP)[(CR #84)(02 STIP)] Apr -04 UW11 0 0 6,000 1 0 8,000 0 0 C 04 IIP San Diego ,Ca ltra ns i 905 374K Otav M esa, 6 -In fwv(02 STIP)(ITIP)(TCR #86)" Jun -04 70,79011 0 0 70,790 j 0 70,790 0 0 C 04 RIP ,San Diego ;Caltrans 905 374K Otay Mesa, 6 -In fwy (Incr)(RIP)(02 STIP)(TCR #86)' Jun -04 8,481 !' 0 0 8,481 0 8 ,481 0 0 C 04 RIP ;San Diego iCaltrans 1 rail 7300 Del Mar Bluffs stabilization Jun -03 7541 0 0 754 0 754 0 0 C 1 02 RIP !San Diego iCaltrans tall 7301 (Sorrento -Miramar, 2nd track (ext 5-02) Nov -03 Nov 03 5,300 5.300 0 0 0 5,300 0 0 C 02 11P San Diego !Caltrans 1 rail 9069A Sorrento -Miramar,dbl track (9855,31) ext 5-02) Nov -03 Nov -03 21,390 21,390 0 0 0 21,390 0 0 C 04 RIP 'San Joaquin !Caltrans l 5 7213 Widening, Mossdale area (TCR #108)(02 STIP) 1 Feb -04 3,244 0 01 3,244 0 3,244 0 0 C i 04 RIP 'San Joaquin !Caltrans i 99 7635 Rt 120 E (Yo semite Av) Interchange (02 STIP) 1 Apr -04 2. 000♦1 0 0 2,000 0 2 000 0 0 C 04 :San IIP 'San Joaquin Caltrans ! 99 7673 Widen to 6 In fwy, Rt 4 -Hammer (02 STIP)(IIP) Jun -03 16,724 0 0 16,724 0' 16,724 0 0 C L. 04 RIP Joaquin iCaltrans i 99 7673 Widen. Rt 4 -Hammer (RTIP) I Jun -03 5,233 0 0 5,233 0 5,233 0 0 C i 04 _ RIP !San Joaquin iCaltrans 99 9841 Rt 99/Hammer Ln Interchange (02 STIP) ] Jun -03 2,921 0 0 2,921 0 2,921 _ 0 0 C 1 04 IIP JSan Joaquin iCaltrans 1 205 7965B Widen 6 In fwy, Rt 5 -11th St (ITIP)(TCR #107) M ar -041 36;080 j 0 0 36,080 0 36.080 0 0 C ; 04 RIP San Joaquin (Caltrans 205 7965B Widen to 6lns, Rt 5 -11th St (RTIP)(TCR #107) Mar -04 24,618 1 0 0 24,618 0 24,616 0 0 C _ 02 C i 031 RIP RIP San Joaquin {Lodi Ioc 2K57 Low Sac Rd. Hamev-Kettleman, widen(ext 6-02) Feb -04 Sep -031 1,856 1,868 0 0 0 1,856 0 0 'San Joaquin ILodl 1 loc 2K57 Lower Sacto Rd, Harney-Kettleman, widen (Ina) Sep -03 1,000 01 '1,000 0 0 1,000 0 0 C 04 RIP !San Luls Obispo Ca ltrans 41 301 Rt 41 W passing la nes, MB-Atasoadero (02S-64) Dec -03 1,204 0 0 1,204 0 1.204 _ 0 0 C 04 RIP ;San Luis Obispo Caltrans 166 6600 Operational Improvements Jan -04 3,437 0 0 3,437 0 3,437 0 0 _ C 04 RIP San Luis Obispo IGrover Beach 1 loc 2074 N Oak Park BI widening, retaining walls Dec -03 323 0 0 323 55 268 0 0 C 04 RIP San Mateo Caltrans 1 1 626 Devil's Slide tunnel (RTIP)(005-10) Feb -04 750 0 0 750 1 0 ° 0 0 C 1 04 IIP San. Mateo Caltrans 1 626 De vil's Slide tunnel (fTIP)(00S-10) Feb -04 750 ' 0 0 750 0 0 0 0 04 RIP Santa Barbara Ca ltrans 101 4460 Santa Maria 6 -lane (R1P)(02 STIP) May -03 15.511 0 0 15,511 0 15,511 0 0 0 4 04 C �04' IIP 'Santa Barbara Caltrans 101 4460 Santa Marla 6 -lane (IIP)(02 STIP) Mav-031 3,261, 0 0 3,261 0 3,261 0 0 RIP Santa Clara (Caltrans 87 443P+ Guadalupe Pkwy HOV (96546)(98S-121) Jun -04 1,000 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 0 04 RP ;Santa Clara ;Caltrans 152 486D PL's, It turn ins (96 grf)(02 STIP) _ Feb -04 4,158 0 0 4,158 0 4,158 0 0 C 44 RIP 'Santa Clara ICaltrans 1 680 B157D' Sunol Grade SB HOV, Ph 3 (02 STIP)(RTIP) Jun -04 9,562 0 0 9,562 0 9,562 01 0 G 04 RIP Santa Cruz )Caltrans 1 1' 542F Rt 17/1 connector, Stage 1E5191 0.02 STIP! D ee -03 39,129 0 0 39,1291 0 39.129 0 0 0 04 RIP Siskiyou I Caltrans 3 3126 At Yreka -Alter Rd, left turn lane Jun -03 200 0 0 200 0 200 0 0 C 04 IIP iSola na JCCJPA rail 6045L Bahia viaduct track & bridge upgrade (ITIP) Sep -03 1,060 0 0 1,080 0 1,060 0 0 C ' 04 RIP ISolano ;CaoCorrJPA ' rail 6045L Bahia viaduct track & bridge upgrade (RTIP) Sep -03 1,000 1 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 C : 04. RIP !Sonoma iCaltrans ' 101 360F Petaluma operational Improvements (RTIP) Jun -04 2,000 1 0 0 2,000. 0 2,000 0 0 04 IIP 'Sonoma iCaltrans 101 7709 Petaluma opera tional Improverents (ITIP) Feb -04 3,200 0 Of 3,200 , 0 3,200 0 _ 0 _1_,_, C ! 04 RIP 'Sonoma iCaltrans 101' 789A HOV lanes, Rt 12 -Steele Lane (RIP) Jun -04 36,770 0 0 36,770 0 36,770 0' 0 C 1 04 IIP ISonoma Caltrans 1101 789A HOV la nes, Rt 12 -Steele Lane (ITIP) Jun -04 12,000 0 0 12,000 0 12,000 0' 0 C 04 RIP Sonoma I Caltrans 1 101 7699. Steele Lane lnterohange homy Jun -04 7,358 0 0 7,358 I 0 7,358 0 0 C 04 IIP ;Stanlslaus (Caltrans 4 120 941' Oakdale Bypass (96 gr()(02 STIP) Mar -04 66,980 0 0 66,980 0 66,980 0 0 C 04 RIP IStanlslau s iCaltran s 120 941 Oakdale Bypa ss (grf, cost incr)(RTIP) _ Mar -04 5,320 0 0 5,320 0 5,320 0 0 C ' 04 _ RIP 1Stanisl.aus :Caltran s 132 9797 Riverside Dr -Empire. widening (98S-106) 1 Jun -04 5,70011 01 0 5,700 0 5,700 0 0 C 04 IIP [Sutte r ' Ca ltran s 70 289B 4 -lane ex resswa , Rt 99 -Cornelius ' 02( 8-18) A9g-03 30,908 0 0 30.908 0 30,908 0 ' 0 C ' 04 C ' 04 _ IIP ISutter IIP Sutter Caltrans 1 701 289P ,, 4 -In ex , Cornelius -Bear River Br"(025-18) 1 Aug -03 46,159 0 0 46.159 0 46,159 0 0 ICaltrans 99 8361A 4lanes, Rt70-GardenHwy (98S-151)' 1 Feb -04 6,943 0 0 6.943 0 6,943 0 0 C I 04 RIP 'Sutter Caltrans 1, 99 8361A 41ns, Rt70-G arden Hwy ' Feb -04 1,557 0 0 1,557 0 1,557 0 0 C 04 RIP Tehama Tehama County I bus 2226 Purchase 2 transit vehicles _ Aug -03' 121 0 0 121 0 121 0 i 0 C 1 04 IIP ]Trinity ICaltrans ; 299 3201 Rocky Pt passing lanes (ITIP) Feb -041 2,377 0 0 2,377 0 2,377 01 0 C I 04 RIP 1Trinity iCaltrans n 299 320 ,Rocky Pt pa ssing lanes (RTIP) Feb -041 1,273 _ 0 0 1,273 0 1,273} 01 0 California Tr --•nortation Commission Page 6 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY L,-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con _ Ext1 Pend 1 Survey Program Year Component C/N Yrti Proa Coun q a nc�r Rte PPNO Pro)eet Mo nth Mo nth Mo nth Total Prio ri FY 03 FY 04 RJW Co nst, E & P. PS&E i a 1 j j C ! 03 IIP Trinity C attrans 2991 301H] Big Bar passing lanes ! Jun -03 2,920 01 2,920 0 0 2,920 0 0 C f 04 RIP Ventura Cattrans 118 2972 Rocky Peak Rd on/off ramps 1 Mar -04 2,050 01 0 2,050 0 2,050 01 0 C 04 RIP Ventura Caltrans_ 118 1238J1 Widening, to Co Line 025-17 g I Au - 03 38,410 j 0 38,410 0 38,410 0 D C 04 p+'`� RIP -. ' fvr��.."�..-? lk�'L YA�.�S' ,+rAs-xY. . _ Ventura �+�y Ventura County 1 loc i � _ 7100 �rt �S � r 1 r � . F' "f„!. w,- leasa�t�S!$ _ and� _ arnryg;: F .. .., .- ;Lewis RdICSUCI access Improvs (02 STIP) �-�4� t Jun $ - 03 ,-d -., 18,222 y,�0 a �`, �i N_ ' 01 0 �� .a,. 18.222 '�,.� /� � !2 . 0 _ .-:�. 18,2221 01 p C 04 RIP Ventura/LA SCRRA t rail l 2024 °Tunnel 26 seismic Improvements i ; Aug -03 9,500 01 0 9.500 0 9,5001 01 0 i 1.663,750 1 t . I Capacity, Preconstructto n - Con s ruction I FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 1 - C 05 RIP Riverside Palm Sorinas 1 toe 1007 Indian Canyon Dr. Tramview-UPRR. widen (02S-48) 1 Dec•03 1761 01 176 0 0 D 0 176 C 05 RIP Riverside Palm Springs I oe OK G Autry Tr, Whitewater-Rt 10. widen (02 STIP) 77 190 0 190 0 1 0 0 0 190 05 RIP San Luis Obispo Eon Luls Obispo Ioc 1125 Santa Ba rbara St, High -Roundhouse, widen (S/O) Jun -03 285 01 0 285 250 0 0 35 C 1 05 RIP Santa Cruz Centa Cruz Co loci 930 Graham Hill Rd Improvs (02 STIP) l Aug -03 205: 01 0 2.0.5 80 0 0 125 C 05 RIP Shasta Redding loci 2038 1 Cypre ss Av Sac RN Br approaches (02S-86) 7? 3131 0 313 0 313 0 0 0 C 05 RIP Trinity Trinity County , loci 2140 Hayfork, realign Hyampom Rd (02 STIP) Jun -03 437 0 437 0 0 0 01 437 C 05 RIP Inyo Bishop 1 Ioc 1502 Maciver St extension, 600' (State o nlly)(02 STIP) Sep -03^ 30 1 0 0 30 30 0 0 0 C 06 RIP Los Angeles I Los Angeles Ioc 3092 Hyperion Av, widen, replace Waverly Dr Bridae (023-111 May -04 1.324 1 0 0 1 .324 0 0 0 1,324 C , 06 RIP Los A ng eles Los Angeles Ioc 3104 First St bridge, widen approaches, repl railing (02S-66) . l Jun -03 1,023 0' 1,023 0 183 0 0 840 C 06 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles 1 lac 3105 Riverside Dr, Barc lay -SF Rd, widen viaduct (028-66) ' Ju n -03 1,465 0 1,465 0 358 0 0 1,107 C 1 06 RIP Mono LSammoth Lakes Inc 2512 Airport Access Rd, new (02S-66) 1 1 Jun -03 20 0 20 0 0 0 20 0 C ' 06 RIP Sacramento Sac County Ioc 2L68 Watt Av, Rt 51-Rt 16, enhancements, phase 2 _ Jun -03 648 ; 0 648 0 0' 0 648 0 06 RIP Sacramento Sa c County Ioc 2L68 Wa tt Av, Rt 51-Rt 16, e nha ncements, phase 2 77 303 0 0 303 0 0 0 303 C I 08 RIP San Luls Obispo SLO County Ioc 1131 Tank Farrn Rd Improvements Jun -04 175 0 0 175j 35 0 30 110 C 06 RIP Tehama Tehama County _ Ioc 2032 Flores Av Access Rd (02S-54) 77 123 0 0 123 0 0 123 0 C + 07 RIP Co ntra Costa Antioch loc 2011A Rt 4 Hlllcrest Av EB off ramp, widen Jun -03 50 0 50 r 0 _ _ 0 50 0 C 1 07 RIP I Humboldt Arca ta loc 2071 _ Foster Av extension to Sunset Av (State only) Jul -04 110 0 0 110 0 01 110 0 C 9 07 RIP Humboldt Humboldt Co loc 2081 Union St/Sea Av, reconstruct/widen (Sta te only) i 1 Jun -03 144 0 0 144 0 01 1441 0 C 07 RIP Kern Bakersfield Io c 8705 Weslside Parkway (02S-66) Jun -04 6;970 0 01 6,970 6,970 01 01 0 C 07 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles Ioc 2863 Overland Av bridge widening at Rt 10 (02S-66) Jun -03 543 o 5431 _ 0 543 0 0j 0 C 07 RIP Mendocino Mendocino Co loc 4101P N State St, MP 0. 5-2.3, improvements (02S-65) Jun -03, 200 0 200 0 _ 0 0. 0 200 C 07 RIP I Rlverslde Riverside Ioc 9994 Van Buren BI, Jackson St -Santa Ana River, widen Aug -03 _ 25 _ 0 0 25 0 0 251 0 N l 07 RIP !Placer TPA Rocklin Io c 151 D Rt 80 Sierra Co llege intercha nge (CT oversight)" Feb -03 44 0 44 0 0 0 44] 0 N 07 RIP Placer TPA Rocklin Ioc 151D Rt 80 Sierra College interchange (ext 6-02) ! Dec -03 245 245 0 0 0 0 01 245 N 07 RIP Placer TPA [Rocklin Ioc 151D , Rt 80 Sierra College Interchange (CT oversight)' Dec -03 24 0 24' 0 0 01 01 24 C ! 07 RIP 'Tulare Tulare County loc 6L11 1 Rd 80 expwy, Goshen -El Monte Way (02S-35) 1 Feb -03 400 1 0 400 0 0 0 4001 0 C 1 07 RIP Tulare Tulare County_ loci 6L11 Rd 80 expwy, Goshen -El Monte Way (ext 5-03) i May -04 May -04 1.301 0 1,301 0 0 01 0 1,301 C 07 RIP :Tulare _Tulare County lo c 6L111 Rd 80 expwy, Goshen -El Monte Way (02S-35) Mav-04 2,381 01 0 2,381 0 0 0 2,381 19,154 1 I 1 1 reco nstructio n fo r Ca act Pro ec s of Pro ramme d for Co nstruction ' C 1 10 RIP Alameda Newark Ioc 2009Ri Central Ave RR overpass at UPRR (APDE) 145 0 1451 0 0 0; 145 0 C _ 10 RIP Alameda Newark loc 2009R Central Ave RR overpass at UPRR ( APDE) 485 01 01 485 0 01 0 485 C 10 RIP ]Alameda Newark loc 2009S 'Thornto n Av. Gatew ay -Hick ory. widen (APDE) 120 0 1201 0 0 0 120 0 - 0, 285 c 10 RIP Alame da Newark Io c 2009S Tho rnton Av, Gateway -Hick ory, widen ( APDE) l 285 1 0 0. 285 0 0 C 10 RIP Humboldt Eureka loc 2069 Waterfront Dr extension (OOS-56) 486 1 0 0J 486 ' 486 0 0 0 C 1 10 RIP Kern Shafter ' loc 87001 7th Standard Rd . Rt 99-Sta F e, expwy (APDE)( ext 5-03 Jun -041 1,000 01 1.000 0' 0 0 0 1,000 C 1 10 IIP Los Angeles SG VCO G osep 2318 Alameda Corr East Grade s eos. East End(TCR #54.1) 1 Dec -02 _26, 0 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 1 10 IIP Los Angeles SGVCOG asep 2318 Alameda Corridor East grade sep. Sunset BI 1 Mav-03 486 0 486 0 486 0 0 0 C ' 10 11P Los Angeles SGVCOG gsep 2318 Alameda Corridor East grade sep, Brea Canyon Rd Jun_ -03, 485 , 485 0 485 0 0 0 0 1 10 RIP Los Angeles Pomona lo c 2232 1Rt 71 Mission BI Interchange (Pomona)02S-52) _01 2,32911 01 2 ,329 0 1,710 0 0 6191 California Transpo rtation Commission Page 7 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con Extl Pend` SurveYl I Program Year Comnt C/N Yr Prog County Agency Rte PPNoI Projec t M onthl M onthl Month Total Prior FY 03 FY 041 RIW ConstV E & P PS&E 1 f` C 10 RIP Los Angeles Monterey Park lo c 2915 tAtlantic BI. Newma rk -Hellman, widen, APD I l 29 0 29 0 0 0 0 29 C 10 RIP Los Anaeies Monterey Park lo c 2915 Atlantic BI, Newmark -Hellman, APD (ext 6-02) Dec -031 Jun -03 _ 139 139 0 0 0 0 0 139 C 10 RIP Los Angeles Santa Clarlta i loc 2865 Newhall Ranch, Rt 5 -Copper Hill, APD (ext 6-02) 252 252 0 0 0 0 0 252 C 10 RIP Merced M erced County lo c 5951 Campus Parkw ay (State only)(OOS-24) 1.400 0 0 1,400 1,400 0 0 0 C 10 RIP Monterey Monterey loc 480 Rt 68 widening near CHOMP, APD (ext 5-02) Dec -03 600 600 0 0 0 0 0 600 C 10 RIP M ontere y TA MC goc 8200 Rt 1, Carmel River Bridge-Rt 68 (APDE)(RTIP) 2,000 0 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 0 C 10 IIP Monterey TAM C lo c 8200 Rt 1, Carmel River Brldae-Rt 68 (APDE)(ITIP) 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 0 1,00.0 0 C 10 RIP Orange _ OCTA loc 2798 Rt 5 Culver Drive so uthbound off -ra mp wIde nina(028-441 126 0 0 126 0 0 0 126 C 10 RIP Orange Tustin loc 9654 Red Hill arade sep (985-1161 332 0 332 0 0 0 332 0 C 10 RIP Orange OCTA ' loc 2671A Rt 5 Oso Parkway SB off -ramp, storage lane(025-44) 1 1,814 0 0 1,814 0 0 0 1,814 C 10 RIP Sacramento Citrus Helahts 1 loc 3L36 Sunrise BI; Oa k -Antelo pe. widen (APDE) 650 0 0 650 0 0 0 650 C 10 RIP Sacramento Folsom loc 3L41 Rt 50 Empire Ranch Rd Interchange (APDE) 900 0 0 900-1 0 0 0 900 C 10 RIP Sacramento Sao RT rail 3L50 W Sac/Davls LRT extension (APDE) 250 0 250 0 0 0 250 0 C 10 RIP Sacramento _ Sac RT rall 3L50 W Sac/Davls LRT extension (APDE) 250 0, 0 250 0 0 250 0 C 10 RIP San Bernardino SANBAG loc 154D Rt 10 Tippecanoe Av Interchanae Improvs /APDE) 2;500 0 0 2,500 0 0 0 2,500 C 10 RIP San Bernardino Barstow loc 1730 Rt 15 Old Hwv 58. new Interchanae Ma -03 90 0 90 0 0 0 90 0 C 10 RIP San Bemardlno Barstow loc 1730 Rt 15 O ld Hwv 58, new interchange 2,660 0 0 2,660 0 0 0 2,660 C 10 RIP San Diego SD M TDB rall 7307 M ld-Coast Balboa extension (02 STIP) 1.000 0 0 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 C 10 RIP San Joaauln Lathrop asap 3K41 1Lathrop Rd grade separation/UPRR 800 0 0 800 0' 0 0 800 C 10 RIP San Luis O bispo Arroyo Grande joc 370A Rt 101 Brlsco Rd Interchange modification (S/0) 165 0 165 0 0 0 165 0 C C 10 RIP Santa Cruz SCCRTC log 932 Santa Cruz Branch Rail Llne R/W (02 STIPI 10,000 0 0 10 000 10,000 0 0 0 101 RIP Sutter Sutter Coun So c 3L44 Rt 99 Rleao Rd; new Interchanae (APDE1 Ma -03 1;000 0 1 000 0 0 0 0 1.000 C 10 RIP Tulare Visalia loo 103 Caldwell Av; Rt 99-Rt 63, 4 lanes (02 STIP) 400 0 400 0 0 0 400 0 C_ 10 RIP Tulare Visalia ! joc 105 ]Plaz a Dr, Rt 198 -Go shen, 4 la nes (98S-1061 615 0 615 0 0 0 0 615 C 10 RIP Tulare Tulare County jo c 8682 ]Caldwell Av, Santa Fe O range, 4 lane s 373 0 0 373 0 0i 373 0 C 10 RIP Tulare Tulare County 1 loc 8683 Betty Dr/Rlaain Av, Rt 99 -Rd 80, widen, realign May -03 125 0 1251 0 0 0 125 0 C C 1 O � RIP Tulare Tulare County loc [ 8683 Betty Dr/Riaain Av. Rt 99 -Rd 80, widen. reallan 359 ' 0 359 0 0 0 359 0 10 RIP Tulare Tulare County loc 8683 Betty Dr/Rlaain Av. Rt 99 -Rd 80, widen, realign 421 0 0 421 0 0 0 421 C 10 RIP Yolo Yolo Co TD rail 3L50! LRT extension to West Sacramento (APDE) 2.250 0 0 2.250 0, 0 2.250 0 1 38,349 1 o i ca • : I y , • n ctlon - Constructlon Scheduled for FY 04 Jun -03 Jun -03 Jun -04 N 02 RIP Butte Butte County loc 1 L47 West 8th Av reconstruction (ext 5-02) 22 r o r 0 0 22 N 04 RIP Butte Butte County loc 2L91 Entler Av rehab May -03 69 0 69 0 0 0 0 69 N 03 RIP Butte Butte County loc 2L94 'Oroville Ba ngor Hwy reconst (ext 6-02) 85 85 0 0 0 0 0 85 N 03 RIP Butte Butte County 1 loc 2L94 Oro vllle Bangor Hwy re co nstruction (ext 5-03) 50 0 50 0 5.0 0 0 0 N 04 RIP Co ntra Costa BART i rail 2011G Add parking le vel g(7 Richmond BART station 200' 0 200 0 0 0 0 200 N 1 04 RIP Contra Costa CC County loc 2011P Stone Valley Rd W sidewalk to Ironhorse Trail (S/0) Mav-03 10 0 10 0 0 0 _ 0 10 N 04 RIP Contra Costa CC County loc 2011S' -I-80 Bikeway storm drain grates (State only) 2 0. 2 01 0 0 0 2 N 03 RIP Glenn _ Willows loc 3L72 Pacific Av. Green -N City Limits. reconst (State only) Feb -03 7 0 7 01 0 0 1 5 N 03 RIP Inyo Bishop loc 1503 M andlch.Sneden.S 3rd. Warren. reh ab (S0)(Incr) Apr -03 56 0 56 0 0 0 0 56 N 04l RIP Inyo Inyo County I_ loc 1005 Mill Creek Road, overlay 8 0 1 7 0 0 1 7 N 04 RIP Inv° Inyo County i loc 1006 Alabama Hills county rds, rehab 42 0 4 38 0 0 4 38 N 04 RIP Inyo Inyo County I loc 1008 Old Spanish Trail Rd, rehab. chip seal 42 0 4 38 0 0 4 ' 38 N 04 RIP Inyo Inyo County loc 2031' Sunland Indian Reservation Road, overlay 5 0 1 4 0 0 1 4 N 03 RIP Los Angeles LA Co unty j loc 2873' G ateway cities Inters ec Improvs (ext 6-02) Feb -04 1,006 1,006 0 0 0 0 0 1,006 N 02 RIP Lo s Angeles Los Angeles ? 100 2858 Eagle Rock ATSAC (ext 5 .02) Feb -04 218 218 0 0 0 0 0 218 N 04 RIP Los Angeles Los An geles loc 3116 Little Taky° pedestrian linkages (025-11) May -03 165 0 165 0 0 0 0 165 N 04 RIP Los Angeles SCRRA _! rail 3201 Rolling stock mtnce facility. San Bernardino (02S-11) 1 Apr -03 2,024 0 2 .024 0 2.024 0 0 0 N 04 IIP Madera C altrana 1 rail 2025 Mader a, new station A pr -03 130 0 130 0 35 0 0 95 California Transportation Commission Page 8 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY L-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con 1 1 Ext Pend Survey Program Year Com • onent C/N Yr Proa Cou nty Agency Rte PPNO Pro ject Mon th Month Month _ To tal I Prior FY 03 FY 04 RN/ Const E & P PS&E 1 N 04 RIP Mariposa Mariposa Co loc 2K12 I Don Pedro subdiv, multiple rds, rehab Feb -03 101 0 10 0 0 01 01 10 N 04 RIP , Mendocino Ukiah Ioc 4089P , RR a massing rehab, 4 locations (Sta te only) Mav-03 16 0 16 0 0 ai 0 i 16 N 04 RIP Plumas Plumas County loc 2251 Clifford Dr, rehab (OOS-7) 30 ' 0 30 0 0 0 10 20 N 02 RIP San Bernardino Needles tea 1E' El +Sarces station restoration (ext 5.02) Feb -03 75 75 0 0 0 0 _ 0 75 Ni 04 RIP Santa Barbara 5 B Co unty Ioc 223E San ta Clau s Lane Class 1 bikeway (00S-01) Apr -03 701 0 70. 0 0 0 0 70 N 04 RIP Santa Barbara Santa Barbara loc 1194 Local street rehab 23 locations (State only) May -03 232 0 232 0 0 0 0 232 N 04 RIP Tulare Porterville loc 8680 Henderso n Av, Jaye-SJV rr xing, rehab Mav-03 31 0 31 0 0 0 0 31 N 04 RIP Tulare Tule River TC loc' 8686 Reservation Rd, Rt 190-Tule Riv Ind Res, Improys Apr -031 50 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 N O4IR1P Tulare Tule River TC loci 86861 Reservatio n Rd, Rt 190-Tule RN Ind Res, 9r VS 1 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 35 I i 4.690 *neap city cons tructicin N 04 RIP Alameda AC Transit bus 2009D Bus component rehabllltation Feb -03 8,500 1 0 0 8,500 0 8500 0 0 N 03 RIP Alameda AC Trans{, bus 2113A Engine transmission rehab Dec -02 628 I 0 L 628 0 0 628 0 0 N 04 RIP Alameda Caltrans 580 117 So undwall, Llvemtare,Vasco Rd -First St Dec -03 _ 737 0 0 737 0 737 0 0 N 03 N 1 03 IIP RIP Alameda Alameda Caltrans 92 90C Soundwalls, Hesperian BI -Santa Clara St (grf) Jun -03 670 , 0 670 0 0 670- 0 0 Union Clty loc 2198 Alvarado -Niles, pav ement rehab Mav-03 240 1 0 240 0 0 240 0 0 N 02 RIP Butte Butte County loc 1L47 West 8th Av reconstruction (ext 5-02) Oct -03 Oct -03 3,060 3.060 0 0 93 2,967 0 0 N 04 RIP Butte Butte County lo o 2L91 Entler Av rehab Apr -04 462 1 01 0 462 0 462 0 0 N 03 RIP Butte Butte County loc 2L93 Neal Rd, 4. 7-5.9 mi E of Rt 99, rehab 1 May -03 610 0 610, 0 01 610 0 0 N 03 RIP Butte Butte County loc 2L941 Oroville Ba ngor Hwy raconst (ext 6.02) Jun -04 Jun -04 965 , 0 965 0 0 965 0 0 N 03 RIP_ Butte Caltrans 99 2415 Durham Pentz Rd, o ff -ramp signals Feb -03 590 0 590 0 0 590 0 0 N 02 RIP Butte Paradise loc 1L24 ClarkSkyway signal (00S-63)(ext 12-01) Dec -03 Aug -03 607 I 607 0 0 0 607 0 0 N 03 RIP Butte Paradise loc 2L114 Almond St. Elliott -Fir. rehab _ May -03 195 0 1_95 0 0 195 0 0 N 02 RIP Butte Paradise lo c 21118 'Clark Rd, north of Wagstaff, rehab (ext 5-02) Dec -03 Au a-03 290 290 0 0 0 290 Of 0 N 03 RIP Butte _ Para dise Ioc 2L119 Pearson Rd, Skyw ay -Black Olive, rehab Feb -031 522 0 522 0 0 522 _ 0 0 N fiti,%RIP Butte Pa radise loc 2L120 Skyway/Wagstaff Intersec rehab (ext5.03) Jun -04 Jun -04 442 0 442 0 ! 0 442 0 0 N 04 RIP Contra Costa BART rail 2011G Add parking leve l Q Richmond BART station 7? 1,800 0 0 1.800 0 1,800 0 0 N 04 RIP Contra Costa CC County loc 2011 P Stone V alley Rd W sidewalk to Ironhorse Trail (S/0) 77 21 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 N 04 RIP Contra Costa CC County loc 20113 1-80 Bikeway storm drain grates (State only) 7? 30 0 0 30 0 _ 30 _ _ 0 0 N 03 RIP Contra Costa Danville lo c 2011M Oak Hill Park frontage improvements (State only) May -03 62 0 62 0 0 62' 0 0 N 03 RIP Contra Costa Lafayette loc 2011L Rellez Valley Rd walkway (State only) Jan -03 109 0 109 0 0 109 0 0 N 03 RIP I Contra Costa M artinez loc 2011W Bay Trail, phase 2 segments (State only) _ Mav-03, 300 0 300 0 30 270 0 0 N 03 RIP Contra Co sta San Pablo l loc 2011Q San Pablo Dam Rd pad path (State only) Jun -03 115 0 115 0 0 115 0 0 N 04 RIP Co ntra Costa WCCTAC rail 9878 Richmond BART/Amtra k sta tion, phase 3 (RTIP) Aug -03 2;100 0 0 2,100' 0 2,100 0 0 N 1 04 HP Contra Costa WCCTAC _ rail 9878 Richmond intermodal transfer station (11P) Aug -03 2,000 1 0 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 0 N 04 I El Dorado Caltrans 50 3209 Placerville op improvs (grf, Incr)(tiP) Jan -04 4,400 0 0 4,4001 0 4,400 0 0 N 04 RIP El Dorado LTC I Caltrans 50 3209 ' Lawyer -Bedford op improvs, 98 grf (O2 STIP) Jan -04 _ 17.181 i 0 0 17.181 0 17,181 0 0 N t 03 RIP Fresno Fowler ma t 6L02 CMAQ match, replace sidewalks, 5th, Main Apr -03 5 ' 0 f 5 0 0 5 0 0 N f 03 RIP Fresno Fresno `mat 6L02 CMAQ match, FCMA signal synch, ph 1 May -03 48 0 48 0 0 48 0 0 N 03 RIP Fresno I Fresno mat 6L02 CMAQ match. Marks/Weber Intersection Feb -03 18 ' 0 18 0 0 18 _ 0 0 N 1 03 RIP Fresno f Kerman mat 6L02 CMAQ match; signal Interconnect May -03 _ 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 N 03, RIP Fresno Reedley mat 6L02 CMAQ match, pad and bike path Mav-03 37 0 37 0 0 37 0 • 0 N 03 RIP Glenn W llio ws Ioc 3L72 Pacific Av, Green -N CIty Umlis, reconst (State only) May -0 3 _ 1 1081 0 108 0 0 108 0 0 N 1 03 RIP Humboldt Arcata loc 2059P Alliance, Samoa-Fostar, rehab Jun -03 6601 0 660 0 0 660 0 0 N i 03 RIP Humboldt Eureka loc 2074 RR crossings, 3 locations, rehab (State only) _ Jun -03 100 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 N . 02I RIP Humboldt Eure ka a lo c 2061P 7th St bike lanes, J -Myrtle (ext 6.02) Dec -03 Dec -03 310 310 0 0 0 310 0 0 N ' 04(RIP I Humbo ldt !Fo rtuna lo c 2078 RR crossings, 3locations, upgrade (State one) Aua-03 30 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 N 04 RIP Humboldt Humboldt Co Inc 2082 , McKlnteyvihle Av, Washington Av, rehab (SAD) Aug -03 580 0 0 580 0 532 0 48 N 1 03 RIP Humbo ldt !Humboldt Co loc 2054P !Walnut Dr, Cypress -Avalon, bike lanes Dec -02 551 0 551, 01 0 551 01 0 California Transportation Commission Pag e 9 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con Ext Pend Survey Program Year CComponent C/N Yr Pro g Co unty Agen cy Rte PPNO, Prolec t Mo nth Mo nth Month Total Prio r_ FY 031 FY 04/ R/WI Constt E & P1 PSBE N 02 RIP Inyo Bishop ioc 4 Wye Road. Rt 6 -Spruce, recon (ext 8-01) Feb -031 385 386 0 0 0' 385 01 0 N 03 RIP Ingo Bishop loc 5 Ho me St, Rt 168-Sle rra , reconstruction Apr -031 410 0 410 0 0 410 01 0 N 03 RIP Inge Bishop ioc 1503 Mandlch,Sneden,S 3rd. Warren, rehab (SO)(inor) Jun -03 14 1 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 N 04 RIP Inyo Inyo Coun ty ioc 1005 Mill Creek Road, overlay Aug -03 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 N 04 RIP Inyo _ Inyo County loc 1005 Mill Creek Road, overlay Apr -04 59 0 0 59 0 59 0 0 N 04 RIP Inyo _ Inyo County ioc 1006 Alabama Hills county rds, rehab _ Aug -03 38 1 0 0 38 0 0 0 38 N 04 RIP Ihyo Inyo County loo 1006 Alabama Hills county rds. rehab C A•r-04 458 0 0 458 01 458 01 0 N 04 RIP Inyo Inyo County loc 1008 Old Spanish Trall Rd, rehab, chip seal Aua-03 38 0 0 38 T 0 0 0 38 N 04 RIP Invo Inyo County loc 1008 old Spanish Trail Rd, rehab, chlp seal A pr -04 4581 0 458 0 4581 0 0 N 04 RIP Inyo lnyo County Ioc 2031 Sunland Indian Re servatio n Road. o verlay A pr -04 38 0 0 38 0' 34 0 4 N 04 RIP Inyo Inyo County 1 loc 2034 Sunland Drive, overlay (98S-53) Aua-03 3111 0 0 31 0 0' 0 31 N 04 RIP inyo Inyo County ioc 2034 Sunland Drive, overlay (98S-53) dun -03' 258 0 0 258 0 258 0 0 N 03 RIP Invo lnyo County loc 3036 Shabbell Lane. overlay Jun -03 105 0 105 0 0 94 0 11 N 03 RIP lnyo Inyo County loc 4019 Tuttle Creek Rcad, overlay Jun -03 224 0 i _ 224 0 0 200 0 24 N 03 RIP Invo Inyo County ioc 4021, Substation Road, overlay Jun -03 111 0 111 0 0 99 0 12 N 03 RIP Kings KCAPTA bus 8528 Intermodal transfer slte Improvements (State only) May -03 400 0 400 _ 0 0 340 0 60 N 03 RIP Lake Clea rlake ioc 3021P Lakeshore , Pe ari, How ard, Uhl, rehab (02S-43) May_ -03 360 0 360 0 0 360 0 0 N 03 RIP Lassen Lassen County loc 2123 Skyline Rd Ext/'South, bikeway (98S-111)(e xt 5-03) Jun -04 Jun -03 74' 0 74 0 0 74 0 0 N 03 RIP Los Angeles Agoura Hills ioc 2875 Central traffic slog system (ext 6-02) 325 325 0 0 0 325 0 0 N 03 RIP ' Los Angeles Agoura Hills ioc 2875 Central traffic signa l system Jun -03 399 t 0 399 0 0 399 0, 0 N 03 RIP Los Anaeles Compton tea _ 2869 Compton Cr blke path, Greenleaf -Artesia Jun -03 388 t 0 388 0 0 388 0 0 N 02 RIP Los Angeles Downey loc 2870 Lakewood BI signal Interconnect (ext 6-01) Dec -02' 112 112 0 0 0 112 0 0 N 03 RIP Los Anaele s Downey loc 2870 Lake woo d BI signa l Interco nnect (005.40) Dec -02 1.035 1 0 1,035 0 0 1;035 0 0 N 02 - - Los Angeles LA C ounty Ig o 2381 Gateway CJIJes Intersecs (98S-75)(ext 6-02) Fe b -04 927 1 927 0 0 0 927 0 0 N 03 Los Angeles LA County loc 2845 Carson St signa l synch, LB BI-Bloomfleld Jun -03 Feb -04 1,427 01 1 0 1 ,427 2,435 ` 0 0 0 1.427 0 0 N 03 RIP Lo s Angeles LA Co unty loc 2873 Gateway cities Intersection improvements (02S-66) 2,435 0 _ 200 2,235 0 0 N 02 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 2858 Eaale Ro ck ATSAC (ext 5-02) Feb -03 2,516 I 2,516 r 0 2.516 0 0 N 02 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 2858 Eagle Rock ATSAC (ext 6-01) Feb -031 f 1,187 1,187 0 0 1,187 0 0 N 03 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles ioc 2858 Eagle Rock ATSAC Feb -03 i 832 0 832 0 0 766 0 66 N 02 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles tea 2868 San Femando Rd bike path (ext 6-01) _ Jan -0;3 2,302. 2.302 0 0 0 2,302 0 0 N 04 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3116 Little Tokyo pedestrian linkages (025-11) 7? 936 0 0 936 01 936 0 0 N 03 RIP Los Angeles Los Angeles loc 3133 Valley Circle BI at Rt 101, ln tersec improvts (SO) Jun -03 301 0 301 0 0 301 0 0 N 03 RIP Los Angeles Los Anaeles rall 3227 Bicycle parking at 5 Pasadena Blue Line stations (SO) May -03 85 0 85 0 0 85 0 0 N 03 RIP Los Angeles Pasadena tea 2912 Pasadena Blue Line pad enhancements. Jun -03 399 J 0 399 0 0 356 0 49 N 04 RIP Los Angeles Redondo Beach ioc 3126 PCH/Catalina Av intersection improvements (02S-11) Dec -03 1,047 0 0 1,047 0 1,047 0 0 N 02 RIP Lo s Angeles Santa Clarlta Ioc 2379 Rehab. replace RR bridges (ext 5-02) Oct -03 1,999 1;999 0 0 0 1,999 0 0 N 02 RIP Lo s Angeles Santa Clarlta rail 2901' Newhall M etrolink, expand parking (ext 6-02) Apr -03 100 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 N 02 RIP Los Angeles South Gate Io c 2362 Firestone BI Improvements (ext 5-02) Feb -04 664 664 0i 0 0 664 0 0 N 02 RIP Lo s Angeles Vernon lac 4300 AtlanticfBandinl inlersec imams (ext 5-01) . Jan -03 2,437 2.437, 0 0 0 2,437 0 0 N 02 RIP Los Angeles Whittler tea 2872 Grea nway bike path, Norwalk BI -Penn St (ext 5-02) Feb -04 Feb -04 1,6341 1,634 0 0 0 1.634 0 0 N 04 RIP Madera Caltrans rall 2025 M adera, new station Aug -03 670 0 0 670 0 670 0 0 N 03 RIP Madera Madera City mat 8850 CM AO match, 2 CNG street sweepers May -03 41 0 41 0 0 41 0 0 N 03 RIP (M adera Ma dera City mat 8850 CMAQ match, Fresno River bike trail May -03 17 0 17 0 0 17 0 0 N 03 RIP (Madera Madera City 1 mat 8850 CMAQ match, CNG bucket lift truck May -03 6 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 N 03 RIP Marin Marin County mat 2163 CMAQ match, Downtown Signal System Mgmt Feb -03 23 ' 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 N 03 RIP Marin Sausalito 1 Ioc 2012R Bridaeway, Princess -Johnson, rehab Apr -03 _ 131 0 131 0 0 121 0 10 N 03 RIP Mariposa M ariposa Co 1 loc 2K11 Darrah Rd, Hwy 49 South -Triangle, rehab Feb -03 415 0 415 0 0 415 0 0 N 04 RIP Ma riposa Mariposa Co Io c 2K12 Don Pedro subdiv, multipl e rds, rehab Jun -04 200 0 0 200, 0 200 0 0 N 04 RIP -Mariposa Mariposa Co 1 Ioc 3K12 Colorado Rd, PM 10.0-11.0, rehab Jun -04 313 f 0 0 313 0 282 0 31 N 1 02 RIP I M endo cino Point Arena Ioc', 4060 Coastal access sc eni c bikeway (ext 6-01) D ec -03 Dec.n3 1941 194 0 0 0 194 _ 0 0 California Tr----ortation Commission Page 10 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY 1...-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) !Co n I Ext. Pend Surve Pro rram Year Corn orient C/N 1 YrIProa County Aaencv Rte PPNO Pro ject Total 1 Prior FY 03 FY 041 R/W Const E & P PS&E N 04 RIP 1 Mendocino Ukiahlo-- RR crossing rehab, 4 locations (State only) 1 Mav-04 112 01 0MiliElJ 0 112, 0 0 N i 03 RIP 1 Mendocino Ukiah Ioc14095P North State St curb ramps, 2 Intersecs (State o nly) Mav-03 1 18 i 0 18 0 J 0 18 0 0 N 02 RIP Mendocino Willits , ioc' 4oetT Train station rehab, east bldg (ext 6-02) Dec -03 Dec -03 232! 232, 0, 0 0 226 0 6 N 03 RIP Modoc Alturas 1 Ioc 2176! Wamer St, Park-Rt 299, rehab (02 STIP) Feb -03; 1,495 1 01 1,495 01 0 1,495 _ 0 0 N 02 RIP Mono Mammoth Lakes 1 ioc 2502 Lake Ma ry Rd bike lane , sidewalk (ext 6-02) ! Feb -04 • Jan -04 3,984 3.984: 0, 0 0 3,984 0 0 N 03 RIP Mono Mammoth Lakes ioc 2505 Meridian BI, reconstruction (02S-45) Jan 05 2,5291 01 2,5291 01 0 2,529 0 0 N 04 RIP Mono Mammoth Lakes ioc 2507 Old Mammoth Rd, rehab (increase)(02S-40) Jun -04 595! 01 0! 5951 0 595 0 0 N 04 RIP Mono Ma mmoth Lake s Iocl 2509 Canyon BI, Tavern, Laurel Mt, Minaret, rehab Jun -04 404 1 01 01 404 0 404 0 0 N 02 RIP Mono _ M ono County ioc 2009 Lundy Lake Rd. rehab (ext 6-02) Aor-03 1,310. 1,3101 0 0 1 1 1.294 0 15 N 03 RIP M onterey Greenfield ioc' 1013 El Camino Real, A. •le -Walnut, rehab (OOS-65) -- Jun -03 50 1 01 50 01 0 50 0 0 03 RIP Monterey 1 Kina City i ioc 10141 Broadway, Russ -3rd, reconstruct (005-65) Mav-03, 50 01 50 0' 50 0 0 N : 03 RIP Monterey Monterey loc 11561 Del Monte Av, Sloat-Palo Verde. reconstruct (SO) Mav-031 885. 0' 885 01 _0 0 885 0 0 N 03 RIP Monterey MST bus 1004 Rehab 12 diesel buses 54011 0 540 0 0 540 0 0 N : 04 RIP Monterey MST bus 1157 Marina transit station Jan -04 2,5001 0; 0 2.500 0 2.500 0 0 N , 03 RIP M onterey Soledad Ioc 1015 West St, Front St, rehab 005-65 Feb -03 61 ; 0 61 0 0 57 0 4 N 1 021 RIP Plumas Plumas County iocj 2045 CR 109, re hab and safety (ext 5-02) Jun -03 1A171 ' 1,417 0 0 0 1,417 0 0 N 1 031 RIP Plumas Plumas Cou nty . iocj 2045 CR 109. rehab and safe Jun -03 5581 0 558 0 1 0 558 0 0 N 1 03 RIP Plumas Plumas County 1 a 2233' Quincy Jct Rd, pavement rehab Feb -03 - 2801. 0 280 0 0 280 0 0 N 03 RIP Plumas Plumas County ioc 2244 Lake Davis Rd, rehab (OOS-7) Feb -03 415 1 0 415 0 0 415 0 0 N 1 03 RIP Pluma s Plumas County 1 Ioc 2247 Rd A -15 PM 3.6-5. 0. rehab (OOS-7) Jun -03 200 i 0 200 0 0 200 0' 0 N ' 031 RIP Plumas Plumas County . ioc 2250 Big Cove Rd, rehab (OOS-7) 1 Feb -03 200 ! 01 200 0 0 200 0 0 N i 04 RIP Plumas Plumas County + ioc 2251 jCliffo rd Dr, re hab (OOS-7) Jun -04 310. 0 0 310 ' 0 310 0 0 N 03 RIP Plumas Plumas County 1 Io c Lee Rd. . reha b (O0S-7) Feb -03 - 29011 0 290 _ 0 0 280 0 10. N 1 03 RIP Plumas 1 Plumes Co un Io c 2254 Bucks Lake Rd.M ea dow Valley. reh (OOS-7) Feb -03 - 315 0 315; 01 0 290 0 251 N 04 RIP Riverside Coro na Ioc 1004 1 Traffic management system Aua-03 1,990 • 0 0 1,990 _ 0 1,990 0 0 N_ 04 RIP Riverside Corona lac OF Linco ln Ay intersec Improvs (02 STIP) Aua-03 1 671 1 01 0 671 0 671 . 0 0 N I 03'RIP Riverside Indio ioc OM (Indio D1, Jackson-Rt 111, reha b 00S-59) Apr -03 325 1 0 325 01 0 325, 0 0 N 03 RIP Riverside Riverside Co Ioc , 1103 Van Bure n BI. Wa sh'n-O ra Terrace. median. turnouts Mav-03 1,323, 01 1,323 0I 0 1.323 0 0 N j 02 RIP Sacramento Elk G rove tea 2L71 Elk Grove BI e nhancement (ext 6-02) 1 Dec -03, Dec -03 7921 792 0 0 f 0 792 0 0 N 04 RIP 'Sacramento Sac Coun tea 2L66 M ather Field Rd/Rt 50 landscaping (02 STIP) Jan -04 1,010 1 0 01 1,010 0 1,0101 0 0 N 1 04 RIP San Benito Hollister ! loci 1187 Local street rehabilitation, 83 segments identlfled j Seo-04 300 0 01 300 0 300 0 0 N 1 03 RIP _ San Benito San Jua n Bautista ; Ioc 853 'Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains (State only) May -031 133 1 0 1331 0 a 133 0 0 N 02 RIP San Benito San Juan Bautista I mati 938 'CMAQ match, bike lane, SJBautista-Rt 101 Mav-03 1 30 ; 30 01 0 0 30 0 0 N 04 RIP San Benito 'San Juan Bautista 1 ioc' 1188 4th St, rehabilitation (State only) May -041 750,1 0 01 750 0 750 0 0 N 1 03 RIP San Bernardino Caltrans 215! 244C Soundwalls, Grand Terrace, Barton Rd -Newport Av Jun -031 1,389 1 0 1.3891 0 0 1,389 0 0 N 1 02 RIP San Bemardlno Needles tea 1E El Garces station restoration (ext 5-02) Feb -03 640 .' 640 0 0 0 640 0 0 N 04 RIP San Die•o Caltrans 805 _ 625 Rt 5, 805, 52, 94 TM S: changeable message signs 1 Feb -04 960 , 0 0 9601 0 960 0 0 N ' 04 RP San Dleao Caltrans I 5' 800 Rt 5. 805, 52. 94 TMS: monitoring stations . pullouts , mar -04 5,600 0 0 5.6001 0 5 .6001 0 0 N 1 04 RIP San Dieao Ca ltrans ' 805 932 Rt 5, 805, 52. 94 TMS: ramp meters Mar -04 7,90011 0 0i 7,9001 0 7.9001 0 0 N 1 03 RIP San Diego Chula Vista io c 435A Rt 805 Orange -Palomar sndwalls (OOS-21) Jun -03 1,145111 0 1,145 0 . 0 1,145 0 0 N _ 04 LP San Diego NCTD 1 rail 2029 Oceanside parking structure (ITIP)(TCR #123) 1 Jun -03 2,700 1 0 0 2 700 0 2,700 0 0 N ! 04 RIP San Diego NCTD i rail 2029 Oceanside parking structure (RTIP)(S/O)(TCR x1123) 1 Jun -03 1.300 1 0 0 1,300 0 _ 1,300 0 0 N j 04 RIP San Diego SDMTDB ` rail 978 Regional automated fare system (State only) 1 Mav-03 7.000 ' 0 0 7,000 01 5,250 0 1,750 N 1 04 RIP San Francisco San Francisco Ioc 1007' 3rd St Intearated TMS 98S-1221 Jun -04 _ 70011 0 0 700 0 700.' 0 0 N 04 RIP San Francisco &F Muni , rail 2134 3rd St light rail, maintenance facility (TCR #20) 1 Aua-03 22,570 ; 0 0 22,570 _ 1 0 22.570 0, 0 N 1 04 RIP San Joaauin Tracy bus 2K47 Tracy downtown multim odal stati on (02 STIP) 1 ?? 3,705 0 0. 3.705 0 3.705 0 0 N i 04 RIP San Luls Obispo P.rrovo G rande I _ Ioc 988A E. Grand Ave rehab (State only) Mav-031 234 01 01 234 1 0 234 _ 0 0' N 03 RIP San Luis Obi .0 Grover Beach 1 ioc 2074 N Oak Park BI widening; retaining walls Mav-03 - 7911 0 79 0 0'1 79 _ 0 0 N 03 RIP San Luls Obispo Morro Bay . Ioc 1105 Rt 1/Rt 41 roundabout (State only) Jun -03 4411! 011 441 01 01' 441 0 0 N 041 RIP San Luls Obispo Pismo Beach i loc' 1114 Dinosaur Caves Park street I mprove ments (S/01 1 1 Aua-03 1631' 0 0 163 0 163 0 0 Callfomla Transportation Commission Page 11 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMA RY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Co n I Ex tl Pend Survey Program Year Component C/N Yr Pro_ a County (Agency p Rte PPNo Pro tect I Month l Month Month, Total Prior FY 03 FY 04 RJWI Const E & P PS&E 1 N 04 RIP San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo loci 1123 1Los Osos V alley Rd lan dscape r) media ns, ph 2 (S/O) Jun -03 150 0 0 150 f 0 138 0 12 N i 03 RIP San Mateo BART loci 1035 ISFO Airpo rt Bicycle Trail (State o nly) May -03 1,343 0 1,343 0 1 534 809 0 0 N 04 RIP San M ate o BART loc 1035 I SFO Airport Bicycle Tra il (SO )(02 STIP) M ay -03 7771 Oi 0 777 1 0 777 0 0 N 02 RIP Santa Barbara Caltrans 101 481 Evans -Sheffield, NB aux In, bikeway (ext 8-02) Oct -03 Aug -03 2. 264 2,264 0 0 0 2,264 0 0 N 03 RIP Santa Barbara Caltrans 101 481 jEvans-Sheffield, NB aux In, bikeway (orf, increase) Oct -03 Aug -03 836 0 836 011 0 836 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Ba rbara Lo mpo c loc 1208 1Loca l street rehab, 8 locations, 3. 7 ml (State only) Aug -03 1.262, 0 0 1,262 , 0 1 .262 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Barbara 5 B County loc 223E (Santa Claus Lane Class I bike way (OOS-01) Jun -041 1.162 0 0 1,162 1 0 1,162 0 0 N 03 RIP Santa Barbara S 8 County ; loc 223G Evans Av/0rtega Hill Rd intersection May -03 3101 0 310 0 1 _ 0 310 _ 0 0 N , 04 RIP Santa Barbara Santa Barbara • loc 11941 local street rehab 23 locations (State only) Aug -03 3.085 0 0 3,085 1 0 3.085 0 0, N 03 RIP Santa Barbara Santa Barbara loc 1197' Sidewalk installation (lots not ID'd){State only) May -03 200 0 200 0 i 0 200 0 0 N l 03 RIP Santa Clara Palo Alto ' loc 2168 CMAQ match, unidentifed project May -03 2921 0 292 0 l 0 292 0 0 N ' 03 RIP Santa Clara San Jose loc 2168' CMAQ match, unidentified project May -03 2311 0 231 0 1 0 231 0 0 N 04 REP Santa Cruz Santa Cru z ! bus 925 t. Mu ltimodal Station_(Ph 2)(TCR #150)(02 STIP) A ug -03 4251 0 0 425 L 0 425 0 0 N 1 04 RIP Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Co loc 2054 Amestl Rd, PM 2. 8-3. 0, recon (02 STIP) Aua -03 1,4801 0 0 1,480 0 1,480 0 0 N i 02 R IP Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Co Ioc 2056 El Rancho Rd recon (985-47)(ext 6-02) : Feb -04 Feb -04 6001 600 0 0 , 0 600 0 0 N . 04 RIP Shasta Shasta Lake loc 2391 Shasta Dam Blvd enhancements. Locust-Wash'n M ay -04 155 0 0 155 1 0 155 0 0 N ! 03 RIP Slsklyou Dorris Io c 2282 Main St, Trian gle St, State St, rehab (State only) Feb -03 320' 0' 320, 0 0 320 0 0 N ' 04 RIP Slsklyou Etna Ioc 2373 Callahan St, Callhan Rd -city lim its, rehab (State only) Jun -03 181' 0 0 181 0 181 0 0 N ; 03 RIP Slsklyou Montague Ioc 22881 Pra ther St, re hab (S tate o nly) Feb -03 350 0 350 0 0 322 8 20 N 1 03 RIP Slsklyou Tulelake loc 2290 Modoc St, F St, rehab (State only) May -03 350 0 350 0 0 325 0 25 N ; 03 RIP Slskiyou Yreka Io c 2215 G reenhorn Rd rehab Apr -03 451, 0 451 0 0 451 0 0 N i 04 RIP Solano Dixon bus 6045J Translt operations building (State only) Dec -03 4001 0 0 400 0 400 0 0 N 1 03 RIP Solano Fairfield loc 321C Central Way, Ritchie -Pitman, overlay Feb -031 1581 0 158 0 0 158 0 0 N 03 RIP Stanislaus _ StanCOG mat 9951 CMAQ match, one dump truck A or -03 9l 0 9 0 0 _ _ 9 0 0 N __ 04 RIP Tehama Red Bluff Ioc 2181 Central Red Bluff, 22 streets, overlay Aua-031 643 0 0 643 0 629 1 13 N 03 RIP Tehama Te hama loc_ 2173 7 streets, rehab (summer 2003) Feb -03 157 0 157 0 0 148 1 8 N 04 RIP Tehama Tehama County loc 21891. Chipseal 38.05 mi various rds Jun -03 361 0 0 361 0 361 0 0 N 1 03 RIP Tehama Tehama Countv loc 2191 Rd 99W, at Red Bank Greek, over 0.6 ml Jun -03 109 0 109 0 0 _109 0 0 N 1 03, RIP' Tehama Tehama County Ioc 2193' Tyler Rd at Rd 99W, Improva/rehab _ Jun -03 182 0 182 0 0i 182 0 0 N 03 RIP Trinitv Trinity County Ioc 2216 Hyampom Rd, PM 0.0-3.5, rehab Apr -03' 729 0 729 0 0 729 0 0 N ': 04 RIP Trinity Trinity County Inc 2219 East Side Rd (CR 106), PM 0.0-2.8, rehab Auq-03 615 0 0 615 0 615 0 0 N 04 RIP Trinity Trinity County Ioc 3163 Weavervllle, sidewalk and retaining wall (023-55) 77 150 _ 0 0 150 0 150 0 0 N 04 RIP Tulare _ Porterville loc 8680 Henderso n Av, Jaye-SJV rr xing, rehab Aug -03 295 0 0 295 0 295 0 0 N i 03 RIP Tulare Tulare bus 8631, Tulare Intermodal transit center Jun -03 1,904 0 1,904 0 0 1,904 0 0 N 04 RIP Tulare Tu lare County 1 loc 8684, Rd 192, Av 200 overpass, rehab (State only) Aug -03 1,027 0 0 1,027 0 1,027 0 0 N 04 RIP Tulare Tulare County Ioc 8685 6 overpasses of Rt 99, pave rehab (State only) Aug -03 864 0 0 864 0 864 0 0 N 04 RIP 1.Tulare _ _ _ Tule River TC loc 8886 Reservation Rd, Rt 190-Tule Riv Ind Res, improvs Jun -03 334 p f} 334 0 334 0 0 N 03 RIP Tulare Vlsalla loc 8633 9 street se gments, reha b Jun -03 934 0 934 0 0 904 0 30 N 1 03 RIP Tulare Visalia 1 lo c 8688 Emergency vehicle preemption, 34 intersections Jun•03 186 0 186 0 0 186 0 0 N , 03 RIP Tuolumne Sonora loc 3K94 City street rehab, 6 locations (State only) Jun -03 210 0 210 0 0 210 0 0 N 03 IIP Various Caltrans rail 2017 Carsharing development (intercity rail)(02S-18) Apr -03 1,975 0 1,975 0 0 1,975 0 0 N i 04 RIP Various Caltrans rail 2017 Carsharina deve lopment (intercity rail){025-18) Aug -03 1,625 0 0 1,625 0 1,625 0 0 N 02 IIP Ventura Caltrans rail 9877 O xnard station pa rking imorovs (ext 6-02) Oct -03 Oct -03 1,081 1 081 0 0 0 1,081 0 0 N 03 RIP Ventura _ Oxnard lo c 8 Soundwall, 88 Rt 101. Snow Av-Jardin Dr (02S-17) May -03 425 0 425 0 0 425 0 ' 0 N 1 04 RIP Ventura SCRRA rail M oorpark -Simi rail replacement Aug -03 4,000 0 0 4.000 1 0 4.000 0 0 N i 03 RIP Ventura Thousand Oaks loc 3141 Soundwahl, Lynn Rd -Wendy Dr (02S-17) _ Jun -03 1.689 0 1,689 0 9 1,680 0 0 N E 03 RIP Ventura Ventura loc 3140 SoundwatI, E Main St -S Hill Rd (02S-17) , Jun -03 469 0 469 0 0 469 0 0 N 03 RIP Yolo Davls loc 2L80 Pavement rehab, phas e 2 _ Jun -03 600 0 600 0 0 600 0 0 I I 198.005r ` California Transportation Commission Page 12 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY i..,-04 STIP PROJECTS ($,,pop's) 1 Con Ext Pend 1 Survey Propram Year I Component C/N Yr Pro p Cou nty Agency j Rte l PPNo Pro jec t _ Mo nth M onth' M onth To ta l Prio r FY 03 FY 04I R N Co nst E & P PS&E i 1 Qn aPaclty, Prsconstructio n - Con struction Scheduled fo r FY 05, FY 06. FY 07 N f 05 RIP Humboldt 'Humboldt Co loc 2093 Central Av (McKlnleyville). re hab (State only) 53 0' 0 53 0 0 0 53 N I 051RIP Humboldt 'Blue Lake 1 loc 2073 Ped, bike, roadway improvements; downto wn 46 01 0 46 10 0 6 30 N 051RIP Humboldt Humbo ldt Co ioc 2089 Tompkins Hill Rd, Fields Landing Dr, rehab (S/O) I 40 01 0 40 I 0' 0 0 40 N N 051RIP Humboldt Humbo ldt Co ioc 2083 Maple Crk Rd, rehab (State only) _ 19 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 051RIP Inyo Bishop loc 1504 Church; E Elm, Jay Sts; rehab (80)(02 STIP) 35 0j 0 351 0' 0 0 35 N 05 RIP Madera Chowchilla Inc 8821 Ventura Av, 3rd -9th, reconstruct (State only) 29 0 29 0 1 0i 0 3 26 N 05 RIP Mariposa Mariposa Co Inc 3K13 East Westfall Rd; PM 10.0-11.0. rehab 17 0 0 17 0, 0 0 17 N 05 RIP Mariposa Ma riposa Co 1 ho c 3K19 Trlanale Rd; PM 14.11-15.11, rehab 1 15 1 0 0 15 01 0 0 15 N 05 RIP Mariposa Mariposa Co loc 3114 East Whitlock Rd; PM 19.0-20.27; re hab 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 15 N 05 RIP ' Mariposa M ariposa Co ' io c 3K16 Homito s R d, PM 10.0-18. 13. rehab 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 N 05 RIP Mendocino _ Ft Braaa ioc 4085P Maln St and Laurel St, signal (State only) Feb -03 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 N 05 RIP TMendoclno Willits ioc 4088P Holly St, rehab. Improvements (State only) 34 0 0 34 0 0 0 34 N 05 RIP Riverside Palm Springs Inc 1007, Indian Canyon Dr, Tramvlew-UPRR, widen (02S-48) Feb -03 87 0 87 0 0 0 87 0 N 05 RIP San Francisco San Francisco locI 2014E1 Audible ed signals, 50 Intersections (State o nly) 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 N 05 RIP San Francisco San Francisco loci 2014F Retrofit median refuges; 4 intersections (State only) 6, 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 N 05 RIP Slskiyou _ Yreka loci 2298 15 collector/residential streets, cape seal (State only) 251 0 0 25 0 0 0 25 N 05 RIP Solano Fairfield rail 6045K Capitol Corridor rall station, Falrfield (02S-80) 125 0 0 125 0 0 0 125 N 05 RIP Tehama Tehama Co unty Inc 2162 McCoy Road, realign (98S-123)(ext 5-011 Feb - 03 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 N 05 RIP Tehama Tehama County! Inc 2194 Baker Rd, Walnut-Rt 36, rehab May -031 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 N 05 RIP Tehama Tehama County loc 2194 Baker Rd, Walnut-Rt 36. re hab (02S-661 30 0 0 30 0 0 0 30 N 06 RIP Humboldt Rio Dell Inc ' 2079 ,Wildwood Av; View St; rehab (State only) 78 0 0' 78 0 0 0 78 N 06 RIP Humboldt Trinidad loc 2080 [Azalea Av. Pacific Av. reconstruct (State only) 41 0 0 41 0 0 1 40 N ! 06 RIP Humboldt Humboldt Co ioc 2086 M urray Rd; Fieldbrook Rd, reha b (State only) 45 0 0 45 0 0 0 45 N ' 06 RIP Humboldt Humboldt Co ioc 2094 Fieldbrook Rd; Glendale -Squaw Crk, rehab (S/O) 46 0 0 46 0 0 0 46 N , 06 RIP Humboldt Humboldt Co ioc 2100 RR crossings of county rds, rehab (S/O) 1 7 ! 0 0 7 0' 0 0 7 N 06 RIP Inyo Invo County r ioc 1016 Ed Powers Road, overlay (02 STIP) 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 N 06 RIP Inyo Inyo County 1 ioc 1017 Red Hill Road, overlay (02 STIP) _ _ 1 0 _ 1 0 0 0 1 0 N 06 RIP Inyo Inyo County loc 1022' Pleasant Valley Darn Roa d. overlay (02 STIP) j 1 0 1 0 0 0 1' 0 N 06 RIP Inyo Inyo County ioc 1103 Starilte Drive, ov erlay (02 STIP) _ 1 1 0 _ 1 0 0 0 1 0 N 06 RIP Inyo Inyo County In c' 5049 Whitney Portal Rd reconstruction 42' 0 42 0 0 42 0 N _ 06 RIP Madera M ade ra City 1 Inc 8828 Street rehabilitation, 17 locations (State only) 150; 0 0 150 0 0 150 0 N 06 RIP Mendocino Ft Bragg hoc 4087P, Franklin St, reconstruct 69 0 0 69 0 0 0 69 N 06 RIP Mendocino Pt Arena loc 4096P1 Local st rehab. Imp rove me nts, vario us locs (S/O) 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 N 08 RIP Orange OCTA _ , loc1 2796 Rt 5 Culver Drive southbo und off -ramp widening(02S-44) Dec -02 53 ` 0 53 0 0 0 53 0 N 06 RIP San Francisco BART 1 rail 1003F 16th St M ission plaza Improvements (State only) 7I 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 N 06 RIP San Francisco BART rail 2014M Talking s cans, downtown SF stations 63 0 0 63 0 0 0 63 N 06 RIP San Francisco BART , rail 2014N Replace ADA tiles at platform edges 50 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 N 06 RIP San Luis O blspo _ SLO County j ioc 1129 Bob Jo nes bike/ped pathway 125 0 0 _ 125 0 0 125 0 N 06 RIP Solano '✓ailelo 1 ferry 2260 Vallejo ferry terminal, Barking (02S-76) j 125 0 125 0 0 0 125 0 N 06 RIP Solano 'Vallejo V ferry] 2260 Vallejo ferry terminal, parking (02S-76) _ _ 1,200 0 0 1,200 0 0 0 1.200 N 06 RIP Trinity _ Trinity County , ioc 2138, E W'ville. Rt 299-Rt 3. new 2 -in rd (ext 5-02) Apr -03 360 360 0 0 0 0 0 360 N 06 RIP Trinity Trinity County j Inc 2276 Deeriick Springs Rd, reconst (State only) 25 0 0 25 0 _ 0 0 ' 25 N 06 RIP Yoio Winters In c 3L46 Grant/Railroad signall zation 1 20 ' 0 _ 0 20 . 0 0 0 20 N - 06 RIP Yuba Ma rysvliie Inc 3L57 Huston St, E 19th, E 18th, rehab 1 20 0 20 0 , 0 0 0 20 N 1 _ 07 RIP Monterey Pacific Grove io c 1158 Lighthouse Av, Eardley-F ount aln . rehab (State only) 15 0 0 15 I 0 0 0 15 N 07 RIP San Luis O bispo Pismo Bea ch Inc 1115 N 4th St Improvements (State only) 32 0 0 32 ' 0 0 32 0 N 07 RIP Tulare Tula re County loc 101 Rd 108; Leland -Caldwell; 4 lanes Feb -03 350 0 350 0 1 0 0 350 0 N 07 RIP Tulare Farmersvllie ioc 108 Visalia Rd; Stevens -Brundage. ops (02 STIP) K1r1 0 25 0, 0 0 25 0 N 07 RIP Volo Ycla County Inc 3L45 Davis -Woodland bikeway. Roads 99 and 29 Apr -03 1 64 01 64 0 0 0 64 0 California Transportation Commission Page 13of15 6/10/2003 SUMM ARY OF FY 03-04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Co nI 1 1 Extl Pend Survey Pro gram Year I. Co mponent C!N Yr! Pro g Co unty Agency Rte PPNO Protect Mo nth Mo nth Month Total Prior FY 031 FY 0411, 12/WE Co nsul E & P PS&E 1 I 1 l 1, r N i 07 N 07 RIP RIP !Yuba Ya lu IYo lo Co unty loc 3L45 - Dav ls-Woodland bikewa y, Roads 99 and 29 56 0 0 56H 26 0 0 30 IMarysvile ioc 3L58 Rldeout Way, Hall-Covllaud. rehab j 16 0 16 011 0 0 _0 16 3,736 ui I 9 — I i Procona trUctlnn, Con stru ction Not 1n the ST1P - Non -Ca a 1 i 10 RIP Lassen Lassen County loc 2261 Janesville Main St. blkepath/rehab (APDE) Mav-03 170 01 170 0 0 01 170 0 N 10 RIP Lassen Lassen County 1 io c 2262 Co unty Rd A-3. overlay, shoulders (APDE) May -03 185 01 185 0 1 0 0 185 0 N 10 RIP Mendocino Ft Bragg io c 4086P Sidewalks and ramps, 318 curb cuts (State only) M ay -03 25 01 25 0 0 0 0 25 N l 10 RIP Modoc Modoc County ioc 2384 CR 60, Eastslde Canal, re pl bridge (HBRR)(02S-13) Feb -03 130 0 0 130 0 130 0 0 N 1 10 RIP Nevada Truckee ioc 3L43 Rt 89. "Mou_ sehole" grade separa tion (APDE) Apr -03 498. 0 498 0 0 01 498 0 N 1 10 RIP Plumas Plumas County ioc 2345 Chester -1st Ave Bridge rail replace; HBRR match Feb -03 25 1 0 25 0 0 0 25 0 N 10 RIP Plumas Plumas County ioc 2246 Rd A-15 PM 0.0-1.45, rehab (02S-821 25' 0 25 0 0 0 5 20 N 10 RIP Sacramento Cal State Sac ioc 3L01 Bicycle master plan implementation Feb -03 46 0 46 0 0 0 0 46 N 10 RIP Sacramento Sac County toc 3L39 Fair Oaks 81, Marconi -Engle (APDE) Apr -03 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 0 1,000 0 N 10 RIP Sacramento Sacra mento ioc 3L18 Raley BI. Santa Ana -Escot. reconstructio n 90 0 90 0 1 0 0 90 0 N 10 IIP San Diego Caltrans rail 9865 San Diegulto River bridge. Del Mar (ext 6-01) Jan -03 855 855 0 0 0, 0 855 0 N 10 R IP San Diego San Diego Co mat 7401B CMAQ match. nolse barr iers, program mgmt Feb -03 41 0 41 0 0 0 20 21 N 1 N 10 10 RIP RIP San Francisco BART San Joaauln Lathrop rail 2014R Embarcadero. Montgomery seismic retro (APDE)(S/O) M ay -03 442 0 442 0 0 0 442 0 gsep 3K41 Lathrop Rd grade separation/UPRR Jan -03 200 0 200 0 0 0 200 0 N 10 RIP Santa Cruz 1Capitola loc 1182 Capltola Village enhancements (State only) 60 0 60 0 0 0 0 60 N 10 RIP Shasta Redding loc 2362 Downtown Mall circulation improvements, env 345 0 0 345 0 0 345 0 N 10 RIP Shasta Redding ioc 2363 Downto wn RR co ngestion relief, env 345 0 0 3 .45 0 0 345 0 N 10 RIP Sisklvou Sisklvou Co ioc 2305 Old Hwy 99. Easy St. overlay (State only) 125 0 125 0 0 0 75 50 N 10 RIP Slskivou Sisklvou Co loc 2302 Ash Cree k Bridge, HBRR match 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 N 10 RIP Solano Vallejo ferry 2261 Ba yllnk fe rry maintenance facility 425 0 0 425 0 0 0 425 N 10 RIP Solano Benicia rail 6045M intermodai transit station. Benicla 225 0 0 225 0 r 225 0 N 10 RIP Staanislaus Turlo ck mat 9961 CMAQ match. bike oath. Canal Dr at Sport Complex Mav-03 1 0 1 0 0 r 0 1 N 10 RIP Stanislaus Turlock mat 9951 CMAQ match. bike oath. Quincy-Daubenberoer May -03 1 0 1 0 - 0 • 0 1 N 10 RIP Stanislaus Modesto mat 9951 CM AQ ma tch; traff ic signals Feb -031 27 0 27 0 0 r 0 27 N 10 RIP Tehama Tehama County lac 2333 Kirkwood Rd Bridge, Jewett Crk. HBRR match 18 0 0 18 0 0 18 0 N 10 RIP Tehama Tehama County lac 2334 -IColumbiaAv Bridge. Jewett Crk. HBRR match 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 N 10 RIP Tulare Tulare Co unty ioc 107 Av 416. Fresno Co -Rd 88.4 lanes (02S-35) --.1 Feb -03 135 0 135 0 0 0 135 _ 0 N 10 RIP Tulare Visalia ioc 8689 Rt 63 street tree landscaping 60 0 60 0 0 01 60 0 N _ 10 RIP Tulare Farmersvrlle roc 108 Visalia Rd. Stevens -Brundage, ops (02 STIP) 64 0 0 64 0 0 0 64 N 10 RIP Yolo `Yolo County ioc 3L47 Rd 98, Rd 29 -Woodland, widen (APDE) Apr -03 168 0 168 0 1 0 0 168 0 N 10 RIP Yale Yolo County ioc 3L48 Rd 32A, Rd 105 -Covell Rd, widen for bikeway (APDE) Feb -03 85 0 85 0 _ 0 0 85 0 N 10 RIP Vora Yolo County ioc 3L48 Rd 32A. Rd 105 -Covell Rd, widen for bikeway (APDE) 56 0 01 56 0 0 0 56 N 10 RIP Yuba Yuba County loo 3L55 Arboaa Rd. Erie -Broadway, rehab (State only) May -03 25 0 25 0 0 0 0 25 N 10 RIP Yuba Yuba County ioc 3L56 (Willow Glen Rd, Marysville-Frenchtown, rehab May -03 40 0 40 0 0 0 Or 40 5,966 Y 02.03 TOM/Rid°sharing - Need Delivery or Legaa _ N 031 RIP San Diego SANDAG tdm 7.404 Rideshare TDM program 1,644 0 1.644 0 0 1,644 0 0 N 03 RIP San Luis Obispo SLOCOG tdm 939 TDM (rideshare) 1 170 0 170 0 0 170 0 ' 0 N 03 RIP San Luls Obispo SLORTA tdm 1136 Regional ridesharing pYrocram 751 0 75 0 0 75 1.889 FY 03-04 TDM/Rldesharina N 04 RIP Marin MTC tdm 2129 Regional rideshare pr ogram 104 0 0 104 0' 104 0 0 N 04 RIP I Merced M CAG tdm 5950 Rideshar e Program l 25 01 0 25 1 0. 25 0 0 California Transportation Commisslon Page 14 of 15 6/10/2003 SUMMARY OF FY 1. _ ,04 STIP PROJECTS ($1,000's) Con I Extl Pend Surve 1 1 Program Year Comarnent C/N Pros County A gency Rte PPNO Project i Mo nth Mo nth M onth, Total IPrlor FY 031 FY 04 i R/W Const E & P PS&E N _ 04' RIP Monterey AMBAG tdm 935 Rldesharing program 214;1 0 0 214 0 214 0 0 N N 04 RIP Riverside RCTC tdm 9801 Rideshare program (02 STIP 52011 0 0 520 0 520 0 0 03 RIP Riverside RCTC tdm 9801 J Rideshare ro• = m 02 STIP' M av-03 400t1 0 4001 0 0 400 0 0 N 04 RIP San Benito San Benno COG tdm 937 TDM/rideshare 251; 0 0 25 0 25 01 0 N 04 RIP 1Sa n Diego SANDAG tdm, 7404 _ Rideshare TDM program 1,688 1 0 0 1,688 0 1.688 0 0 N 04 RIP San Fran cisco MTC tdm 2133 Regional rideshare program $37 1 0 0 337 0 337 0 0 N 04 RIP San Joaquin SJCOG tdm 7950 TDM Rldesharing 167 ! 0 0 167 0 167 0 0 N 04 RIP San Luis O bispo SLOCOG tdm 939 _ TDM (rldeshare) 178 0 0 178 0 178 0 0 N 04 RIP San Luis Obispo SLORTA tdm 1136 Regional ridesharina proaram 45 0 0 45 0 45 0 0 N 04 RIP San M ateo M TC tdm 2015A Regional rldeshare program I 265 0 0 285 0! 265 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Barbara SBCAG tdm 1214 Traffic solutions program maintenance (State only) 125 (1 0 125 01 125 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Barbara SBCAG tdm 1215 Traffic solutions program enha nce ment (State only) 1 9 0 0 9 01 9 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Clara MTC tdml 2146 Re gio na l rldeshare program (OOS-27) _ 1 718 ' 0 0 718 _ 0 718 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Cruz SCCRTC tdm 922 Rideshare Program I 163 0 0 163 0 163 0 0 N 04 RIP Santa Cruz SCCRTC tdm 923 Highway 1 Freeway Service Patrol May -031 76 J 0 0 76 0 76 0 _ 0 N 04 RIP Solana MTC tdm 21541 Regional rideshare program 16311 0 0 163 0 163 0 0 N 04 RIP Sonoma M TC tdm 2158 Regional rideshare proaram 185 0 0 185 0 185 01 0 5,407 ---_ _ FY 02-03 RSTPIC AO TEA Match Reserve fUndesignated) - Need Deliv ery or Lapse 11 N 03 RIP Fresno COFCG mat 6L02' (CMA Q match re serve 56011 01 580! 0 0 580 0 0 N 03 RIP Madera Madera CTC mat 88501 CM AQ match rese rve 3 0 31 0 0 3 0 0 N 03 RIP Marin M TC mat 2163 CMAQ match reserve (98S-31) 1 92 0 92' 0 0 92 0 0 N 02, RIP Merced MCAG mat 5961 CMAQ match reserve (00S-24)(ext 6-02) Jun -03 _ 62 62 0 0 0 62 0 0 N 03 RIP Merced MCAG mat 5961 CMAQ match reserve (00S-24) 72 1 0 72 0 0 72 0 0 N 03 RIP San Diego SANDAG. mat 7401B RSTP/CM AQ/TEA match reserve 263 1 0 263 0 0 263 0 0 N 03 RIP Santa Clara MTC mat 2168 CMAQ match reserve (98S-122) _ 274 1 0 274 0 0 274 0 0 N 03 RIP Stanislaus StanCOG mat 9951 RSTP/CMAQ/TEA match reserve 37911 0 379 0 0 379 0 _ 0 N 03 RIP Tahoe RPA Tahoe RPA matt 3L85 1CMAQ match reserve _ _ 173 0 173 0 0 173 0 0 1.898 FY 03-04 RSTP/CMAQ/TEA INatah Res erve Un dos i na d f N 04 RIP Fresno COFCG mat 6L02 CMAQ match reserve 1 1,019 . 0 0 1,019 0 1,019 0 0 N 04 N 04 RIP ;M arin _ RIP San Benito MTC San Be nito COG mat 2163 CMAQ match reserve (98S-31) 1 115 ` 0 0 115 0 115 0 0 mat 938 CMAQ match reserve (98S-124) _ 30 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 N 04 RIP (San Diego SANDAG mat 7401B RSTP/CM AQ TEA match reserve 1.476 0 0 1,476 0 1,476 0 0 N 1 04 ' RIP jSolano MTC mat 2170 CMAQ match re serve (98S-122) 178 1 0 0 1781 0 178 0 0 N 04 RIP 1'Sonoma M TC mat 2172 CMAQ match reserve (98S-122) 127 I 0 0 127 0 127 0 0 N 1 04 RIP IStanislaus StanCOG mat 9951 RSTP/CMAQ/TEA match reserve 1 I 850 1 0j 0 850 _ 0 850 0 0 1 1_ 1 3,795 1 1 {1 1 1 2,038,3681i T J Callfornla Transportation Commission Page 15 of 15 6/10/2003 AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: June 11, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs "Committee as a Whole" Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development 1 THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Update on the Moreno Valley -San Bernardino County CETAP Corridor PLANS AND PROGRAMS "COMMITTEE AS A WHOLE" AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on the Moreno Valley - San Bernardino County CETAP Corridor. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached for your information is a copy of the Notice of Preparation to start the California Environmental Quality Act work on the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County CETAP Corridor. This notice has been sent out to over 500 agencies and individuals to inform them of the start of the CEQA work for this CETAP corridor and to solicit their comments by June 10, 2003. Included in the transmittal letter was a notice of two public scoping meetings. Meetings will be in an Open House type format and run from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00pm. The meetings will be held on Wednesday, June 4, 2003 at the City of Loma Linda Senior Center and on Thursday, June 5, 2003 at the City of Moreno Valley City Hall. Additionally, newspaper advertisements regarding the NOP and the upcoming public scoping meetings were included in the May 12th editions of the Press Enterprise and the San Bernardino County Sun and on May 16th in La Prensa. Attachments: 1) Transmittal Letter 2) Notice of Preparation 3) Public Notice Agenda Item 8F 190 Moreno valley to San Bernardino County Corridor Cpmarft WO. Governments SANBAG Working Lo ether May 6, 2003 Subject: Notice of Preparation for the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Dear: Responsible Agencies, Elected Officials, and Interested Parties Attached is the Notice of Preparation (NOP) or a public notice of availability of the NOP for the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County transportation corridor in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties_ The Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor (Corridor) study was initiated through the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP). The main purpose of the Corridor study is to identify specific transportation solutions that can help improve mobility between State Route 60 and Interstate 10. The study is a joint effort between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). The purpose of the NOP is to describe the proposed project, solicit input regarding the scope and content of the analysis in the Draft EIR, and describe the potential environmental impacts that the Draft EIR will evaluate. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15060 and 15063, an Initial Study is not required and is not included with the NOP. The Draft EIR will be prepared as a Program EIR (CEQA Section 15168) to provide analysis sufficient to support the preservation of right-of-way for transportation facilities in the circulation elements of the appropriate Local General Plans. A more detailed level of environmental evaluation resulting in a Focused or Supplemental EIR will be required prior to construction of the Corridor. The RCTC and SANBAG would appreciate your comments, suggestions, or concerns regarding potential environmental impacts related to the proposed project. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but no later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please submit your comments by June 10, 2003_ In your response, please note the primary contact person for your agency or organization. Written comments regarding the NOP may be sent via regular mail or fax to the following: 191 Riverside County Transportation Commission Ms. Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Fax: (909) 787-7920 Or San Bernardino Associated Governments Mr. Ty Schuiling, Director of Planning and Programming 472 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92401-1421 Fax: (909) 885-4407 In addition, public scoping meetings have been scheduled at two locations in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The meetings will be held from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The dates and locations are as follows: Wednesday, June 4, 2003 City of Loma Linda Senior Center 25571 Barton Road Loma Linda, CA 92354 Transit access available from RTA Bus Route 25 and Omnitrans Bus Routes 2 and 200. Thursday, June 5, 2003 City of Moreno Valley City Hall 14177 Frederick Moreno Valley, CA 92552 Transit access available from RTA Bus Route 16. Thank you in advance for any comments. If you have any questions about the proposed project or the environmental review process, please contact Ms. Cathy Bechtel at (909) 787-7141 or Mr. Ty Schuiling at (909) 884-8276. Sincerely, Cathy Bechtel Ty Schuiling Director of Transportation Planning and Director of Planning and Programming Policy Development San Bernardino Associated Governments Riverside County Transportation Commission Attachment: Notice of Preparation or Notice of Availability of the NOP 192 NOTICE OF PREPARATION of an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) for the MORENO VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CORRIDOR in RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA Lead Agencies: Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) ltitvr CORMS T , c Com,., ;on May 2003 193 Governments SAN BAG Working Together NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE MORENO VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CORRIDOR STUDY Introduction This document is the Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for transportation improvements between Riverside and San Bemardino Counties. The purpose of the NOP is to describe the proposed project, the location of the project, the probable environmental effects of the project that will be evaluated in the EIR, and solicit input regarding the scope and content of the analysis to be included in the EIR. This NOP is being issued in accordance with Section 15082(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Background The Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor (Corridor) Study was initiated through the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) being undertaken jointly by the County of Riverside and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC). CETAP is one component of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP), which also includes the Riverside County General Plan update and a Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for Riverside County. The main purpose of the Moreno Valley to San Bemardino County Corridor Study is to identify specific transportation solutions that can help improve mobility between State Route 60 (SR -60) and Interstate 10 (1-10)_ The study is a joint effort between RCTC and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). A Moreno Valley to San Bemardino County Corridor Policy Advisory Committee, involving RCTC, SANBAG, the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, numerous resource agencies, and the Cities of Banning, Colton, Grand Terrace, Loma Linda, Moreno Valley, Perris, Redlands, Rialto, Riverside, San Bemardino and Yucaipa, has been established to help guide the study efforts. Two public information meetings were held in Moreno Valley and San Bernardino County in April 2001 to obtain input from residents, businesses, and other stakeholders in the area. The input from these meetings was used to define the alignments to better avoid and minimize impacts to the community and the environment Two public scoping meetings will be held during the NOP public comment period (one in each County) to solicit input from the public on the scope of significant issues to be addressed in the Draft E1R. According to current projections by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and SANBAG, the Inland Empire's population is expected to reach over 5.5 million by 2025, and employment is expected to more than double. Due to the fast pace of development, opportunities are being lost to preserve land for transportation facilities. Therefore, an important goal of this effort is to complete environmental documentation on a schedule sufficient for use in preserving right-of- way for regional transportation facilities_ 1 194 The objective of the proposed EIR is to provide environmental analysis of transportation improvements within the area generally bounded by 1-10, Riverside Avenue (west of Interstate 215 [I-215]), and SR -60 to allow agencies to proceed with the protection of right-of-way for the proposed alignments. The EIR will be prepared as a Program EIR (CEQA Section 15168) to provide analysis sufficient to support the preservation of right-of-way for the improvements by inclusion of the proposed alignments in the circulation elements of the appropriate local General Plans. Portions of the proposed transportation improvements may already be included in local General Plans, but portions of their alignments may need to be refined to coordinate with the location of the core facility. Identification of the alignment in a General Plan does not suggest that funding is available for such facilities, nor does it suggest the sequencing or phasing of their construction. A more detailed level of environmental evaluation resulting in a Focused or Supplemental EIR will be required prior to construction of any of the improvements. Actual construction of the improvements may be a number of years away, but it is important to make these decisions early to be certain that the facilities will be constructed to allow land development to take place in an orderly, efficient, and predictable manner. According to SCAG's 2002 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) for fiscal years 2002/2003-2007/2008, there are several improvements planned on I-10, I-215, SR -91, and SR -60 within the vicinity of the proposed Corridor. SR -60: two High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes are proposed from I-215 to Redlands Boulevard (Project ID #46360). SR -91: HOV lanes are proposed through the City of Riverside from Mary Street to the junction of SR -60/1-215 (Project ID #RIV010212). There are several interchange improvements proposed on I-10, including modifications to the interchanges at Riverside Avenue, Pepper Avenue, Tippecanoe Avenue, and California Street. In addition, one mixed flow lane is proposed in each direction on I-10 from Orange Street to Ford Street (Project ID #47440). The Riverside 1-215 Corridor Improvement Project proposes to widen I-215 from six to eight lanes from the junction of SR-60/SR-91/1-215 to the split of SR -60/1-215, including mainline/interchange improvements, HOV lanes, auxiliary lanes, and a southbound truck climbing lane (Project ID #0121D). Portions of the project are already complete. The I-215 North in San Bernardino from I-10 to SR -30 will add two HOV lanes and operational improvements. • 1-215: proposed HOV flyovers connecting SR -60 and 1-215. At this time, the general project limits extend along I-215 from just south of the existing I-215/SR-60 interchange in Riverside to Orange Show Road, north of the existing I-215/1-10 interchange in San Bernardino. These improvement projects are independent of the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor Study, and the environmental effects of these projects have been or will be addressed in separate environmental documents for each project - 2 Project Goals and Objectives The goal of the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor Study is to accomplish the objectives listed below to the extent possible within the financial and physical constraints that exist in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. • • • • • • Improve safety on the existing highway network between Moreno Valley and San Bemardino County - Reduce travel times between Moreno Valley and San Bernardino County Improve the projected future vehicle Level of Service (LOS) and reduce the amount of existing and future congestion on north -south arterials between Moreno Valley and San Bernardino County Improve access to employment centers in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties (March Air Reserve Base, San Bernardino Intemational Airport, Loma Linda medical complex, etc.) Improve transit opportunities between Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Implement transportation facilities that will support the vision and land use plans within Riverside and San Bernardino Counties Implement transportation facilities that will protect the environment and community character between Moreno Valley and San Bernardino County Preserve right-of-way and secure concurrence from appropriate local, regional, and State agencies sufficient to include the proposed alignments in the circulation elements of the appropriate local General Plans Project Location Figure 1 depicts the regional location, surrounding vicinity, and project location for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor. The Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor study area focuses on the area generally bounded by I- 10, 1-215, and SR -60. The project study area encompasses portions of the Cities of Rialto, Colton, Grand Terrace, San Bernardino, Loma Linda, Redlands, and Yucaipa in San Bernardino County and the Cities of Moreno Valley, Calimesa, and Riverside in Riverside County. The Cities of Rialto, Colton, San Bernardino, Loma Linda, Redlands, Yucaipa, and Calimesa are located along the I-10 freeway, beginning west of I-215 at the City of Rialto, traveling east towards the City of Calimesa at the Riverside County line. The City of Grand Terrace is located along I-215, south of the I-10/1-215 interchange. The City of Riverside encompasses the junction of I-215/SR-60/SR-91, and the City of Moreno Valley is located along SR -60, east of I-215. 3 196 Rialto re iul wa Ia Colton • • • 1 1 .• Riverside ee. Q 1 Z a a F Q San Bernardino ia 3 1 1 '0 1cn 1 y • 11 Grand Terrace MAIN ST ,r . ter. .r.+ •+ r..rerr ♦ Riverside ♦♦ County Landfill Box Spring Mountain Reserve BARTON RD ti 0 SAN San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill C Redla nds r/ Moreno Valley 60 Yucaipa San Bernardino County Riverside County Calimesa Los Angeles Count/ Sa n Bere nrdiuo Comity 4tverslde - Coun�y a_ . Project Location San Diego Co unty in�i erl ut Coiruty 1 c o 1 LEGEN D Core Facility (Expressway) MC EE Tunnel Section "*r Arterial Improvements Core Facility Study Area Governments Figure 1 SA N BAs +. rjav rsislb ♦w ooed. VeespU rtati oa i o nrmleekow Working Together 3 Kilometers 2 Miles Project Location Moreno V alley to San Bernardino Co unty Corridor ! IS. (or ao to S8 CountylReglanaLcdr (U6R)3) Project Description The Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor includes the preservation of right-of-way for a "core facility" and "arterial improvements." The core facility includes a new transportation corridor that connects the SR -60/I-215 interchange in Box Springs (at the west side of Moreno Valley) with Barton Road, connecting to 1- 10 via existing planned California Street, between the Cities of Loma Linda and Redlands_ The arterial improvements include connections -to the core facility from other arterial roadways within the project study area. The core facility and arterial improvements are described in more detail below. Core Facility The core facility is proposed as a limited access expressway from the I-215 to Barton Road. The expressway begins at the SR -60/I-215 interchange and generally follows Morton Road north to the Box Springs Mountain Reserve_ A four lane tunnel (two tubes of two lanes each) approximately 2.98 kilometers (1.86 miles) in length and 12 meters (40 feet) wide would be constructed under Box Springs Mountain, north of Moreno Valley. The expressway travels east of the closed Riverside County Landfill, crossing the San Bernardino County line on the west side of the San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill. As shown on Figure 1, the shaded area is the Core Facility study area where the core facility will be aligned from the Riverside County line to a connection at Barton Road. This portion of the alignment will be determined through the public scoping process associated with this NOP. The expressway will have intersections or interchanges at Pigeon Pass Road, Reche Canyon Road, and Barton Road. At -grade intersections may be built at intersecting arterial streets between I-215 and I-10 in an early phase, with interchanges constructed when traffic demand warrants. In addition, it is possible that the section from Pigeon Pass Road eastward could be built in an initial phase, with the section from Pigeon Pass Road to I-215 reserved for a later phase, due to the high cost of the tunnel portion. The expressway will be designed as a rural -type cross section (no curbs) consistent with local and/or Caltrans standards. The design will include narrowing in the tunnel and mountainous sections of the expressway to reduce costs and to integrate with the environment. The maximum right-of-way width required in the expressway section will be approximately 120 feet plus additional width for cut and fill. The area to be studied for the expressway would be in the range of 300-1,000 feet to allow for flexibility in future alignment decisions that best accommodate facility design features and that avoid and minimize potential impacts. RCTC, SANBAG, and local governments will work actively with property owners within the study area to minimize the environmental study areas so that the actual alignment can be more accurately identified during the scoping period_ The limited access expressway section will be four lanes (two lanes in each direction), with additional lanes as needed at intersections or interchanges. The arterial section along California Street will contain six lanes with turn lanes sufficient to accommodate projected left and right -turning traffic. The expressway sections will include landscaped medians, excluding the tunnel section under Box Springs Mountain Reserve. The arterial section of the core facility along California 5 198 Street will be designed in compliance with cross-section standards of the City of Loma Linda. The expressway will provide for habitat connectivity and wildlife crossings at appropriate locations, where feasible. No through trucks will be allowed on the expressway. The desired speed is 65 mph, with 55 mph allowable in areas of difficult topography. Access will not be provided to the expressway in areas where no development is planned. In general, any access will be at intersections with other roadways, with no direct access to adjacent properties in areas along the expressway section. Access to businesses will be provided along the California Street section. Arterial Improvements Arterial improvements that connect to the core facility are proposed as controlled access arterials (i.e. private driveways will be redirected to a possible frontage road and enter at a traffic signal, to the extent possible). These elements include the preservation of right-of-way along Riverside Avenue and other existing arterial roadways in the Reche Canyon area, such as Reche Canyon Road, Reche Vista Avenue, and Pigeon Pass Road. The proposed arterial improvements include the widening of the existing arterials to four lanes and will include signalization and intersection improvements consistent with local and/or Caltrans standards. Each arterial improvement is described in more detail below, and is shown on Figure 1. Pigeon Pass Road. Pigeon Pass Road will be widened, paved and realigned to a four lane arterial at the north end of Moreno Valley. The arterial will connect to the core facility southeast of the closed Riverside County Landfill and north of the Box Springs Mountain Reserve (see Figure 1). If the tunnel section of the core facility is not constructed until a subsequent phase, improvements to Pigeon Pass Road southerly toward SR -60 may need to be considered as part of the interim solution. Reche Canyon Road North. Reche Canyon Road will be widened to a four lane arterial from its connection at the core facility to Barton Road in the City of Colton. The arterial will be realigned across from Hunts Lane and will continue north on Hunts Lane to its existing connection with I-10. Reche Vista Drive. Reche Vista Drive will be widened and realigned to a four lane arterial from Perris Boulevard at the north end of Moreno Valley to Reche Canyon Road. Reche Vista Drive intersects Reche Canyon Road north of Moreno Valley. The existing Reche Canyon Road will be widened to a four lane arterial from its intersection with Reche Vista Drive to its connection with the core facility_ Riverside Avenue. Riverside Avenue will generally proceed from the core alignment across or around the closed Riverside County landfill, circumvent the Spring Mountain Ranch development on the north, connect to Main Street in the community of Highgrove in unincorporated Riverside County, proceed westerly across I-215 to Riverside Avenue, and follow Riverside Avenue north to I-10_ In addition; La Cadena Drive will be realigned to allow an elevated intersection with 6 199 the Pigeon Pass -Riverside Avenue arterial west of 1-215. Signalization would be required. However, this does not assume a new interchange with 1-215 at this location_ The realigned portion of La Cadena would match the existing La Cadena roadway. Environmental Review Process This section discusses the environmental review process necessary for the completion of the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor EIR. Since RCTC and SANBAG, have committed to prepare an EIR, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15060 and 15063, an Initial Study has not been completed for this NOP. This NOP contains a description of the environmental issues and analysis proposed to be provided in the EIR. A Program EIR will be prepared for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor Study, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. The EIR will evaluate potential project related impacts anticipated to result from implementation of the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor, and will include preliminary mitigation measures to minimize the identified impacts. The EIR is intended to provide the necessary CEQA clearance for the proposed facilities so that the proposed alignments may be included in the circulation elements of the appropriate local General Plans. The EIR analysis will be based on conceptual engineering design (i.e., a facility centerline, typical cross section, and right-of-way line), including plan and profile_ Subsequent environmental evaluation will be required prior to construction of the project to address construction -level impacts. The CEQA Guidelines require preparation of objective analysis and documentation to inform decision makers, the general public, and responsible agencies of the direct and indirect environmental effects of a proposed action and mitigation measures that reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts_ RCTC and SANBAG are serving as the joint Lead Agencies for CEQA. Caltrans, the County of Riverside, the County of San Bernardino, and the affected Cities are Responsible Agencies for the EIR. After its publication, the Draft EIR will be available for public review and comment, and multiple public hearings will take place. After all comments have been responded to, RCTC and SANBAG may certify the Final EIR. If the project were given environmental approval under CEQA, RCTC and SANBAG, in cooperation with the Responsible Agencies, could move forward with the preservation of right-of-way for all or part of the project, and proceed with the next phase of engineering and environmental studies. Local jurisdictions can also use the Final EIR as the CEQA documentation for their General Plan Amendments. Probable Environmental Effects The following explanation of probable environmental effects of the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor Study is provided to help guide the analysis in the forthcoming EIR document and to provide information to the public and agencies reviewing this NOP. 7 200 Aesthetics Construction of the proposed transportation facilities will change the overall visual character within the project study area_ Visual impacts may include cut and fill areas on Reche Canyon Drive as well as a large bridge structure near the Box Springs Mountain Reserve. In addition, roadway embankment areas may be highly visible in the Reche Canyon area within and from the Cities of Loma Linda and Redlands. A preliminary visual analysis will be prepared to address potential visual impacts of the proposed project. The analysis will describe the existing visual characteristics of the proposed facilities and the surrounding area and will identify any significant visual resources or scenic vistas within the facilities. Impacts will be assessed in terms of modifications to land forms and other visual features, as well as any light and glare that may result from project implementation. Key issues to be considered in this analysis are removal of vegetation (trees, etc.), the alteration of significant landforms, and the construction of roads and highway improvements where none presently exist. Air Quality Regional and local air quality may be affected by the construction of the proposed transportation facilities. An air quality analysis including a carbon monoxide (CO) hot spot analysis will be prepared to identify potential impacts to regional and local air quality. The air quality analysis will discuss both short-term impacts resulting from construction, as well as long-term impacts resulting from project operation. The analysis will be based on regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to determine if the proposed facilities would result in any exceedance of SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District) established emission thresholds. Biological Resources The proposed facilities may impact sensitive biological resources, such as plant life, wildlife, and sensitive natural communities. Potential impacts include direct loss of habitat from grading or other construction activities, direct loss of animals and plants by project construction, loss or disruption of wildlife movement corridors, and habitat fragmentation. The construction of the core facility will result in direct impacts to biological resources, specifically in undeveloped areas such as the "Badlands" (near San Timoteo Canyon) and the Box Springs Mountain Reserve. The construction of the proposed auxiliary tunnel through the Box Springs Mountain Reserve will require significant cut and fill, resulting in a direct loss of wildlife habitat. Biological resources in the Blue Mountain area will also be impacted by the proposed arterial improvements along Pigeon Pass Road and Reche Vista Drive. A biological resources assessment will be prepared to identify biological resources (including sensitive species and habitat types) known to exist and potentially occurring within the Corridor and will include a discussion of habitat linkage and wildlife corridor issues. The assessment will also identify areas that potentially qualify as wetlands and other jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The results of the biological resources assessment will be summarized in the EIR. The EIR shall discuss consistency with relevant local, regional, and State habitat conservation plans. Portions of the facilities are proposed within the Riverside 8 201 County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)_ The Riverside County MSHCP is presently in draft form and is scheduled for adoption in mid -2003. A San Bernardino Valley Wide MSHCP is currently in the preliminary planning stages, and no specific schedule is available regarding its implementation_ Measures will be taken to ensure that the proposed improvements are consistent with any newly adopted plans related to the each MSHCP. Impacts to biological resources will be estimated in the EIR based on the relationship of the proposed improvements to known biological resources as identified in the Riverside County MSHCP and any San Bernardino Valley environmental initiatives. The analysis will identify linkage crossings, core crossings, and edge impacts related to the MSHCP. Within Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, mitigation for impacts to habitat areas may be provided through the proposed conservation areas defined in the existing and proposed biological reserves. Cultural Resources The proposed improvements have the potential to affect both prehistoric and historic cultural resources. Potential impacts include direct loss of resources from grading or other construction activities, as well as indirect effects resulting from construction of new transportation facilities that may affect the historical context of a particular resource. Potential impacts to cultural resources will be identified in a cultural resources assessment. The assessment will include the results of a records search conducted through the Archaeological Information Center at UC Riverside and the San Bernardino County Museum. The records search will be used to determine the location of known archaeological sites and any prehistoric resources that are listed or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Due to varying transportation improvements and geologic formations in the project area, there is a high likelihood that the proposed facilities will impact paleontological resources. A paleontological assessment will be prepared to analyze potential impacts to fossil resources. Geology and Soils A geotechnical report will be prepared to discuss potential geological impacts of the proposed project. In addition, a preliminary geotechnical feasibility report will be prepared to identify potential geotechnical, geologic, hydrogeologic, and seismic hazards related to the construction of the proposed tunnel. The results of the reports will be summarized in the EIR and will focus on the increased potential for landslides and/or seismic hazards. The EIR will also discuss the increased potential for soil erosion and impacts on mineral resources. Hazards and Hazardous Material A hazardous waste Initial Site Assessment (ISA) will be prepared for the proposed facilities. A records search of agency databases will be conducted to determine whether the proposed project would impact known hazardous waste sites; a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code 65962.5 will be reviewed. Field surveys will be conducted as necessary to determine the potential 9 202 presence of unknown hazardous wastes within the corridor that could be impacted by construction of the proposed project. Potential hazardous waste impacts could occur from soil or groundwater contamination that exists within properties to be acquired for the project or where contamination on an adjacent property would pose a health risk to construction workers. Potential impacts related to hazardous materials identified in the ISA and potential safety hazards related to the construction of the proposed facilities will be summarized in the EIR. Hydrology and Water Quality A surface water hydrology technical report will be prepared to evaluate the location of the proposed facilities in relation to existing watershed drainage areas and defined blue line streams. The evaluation will initially focus on opportunities to avoid impacts to surface water, where feasible, by shifting alignments. Existing flow control structures will be identified, and the facilities will be examined for their position within the watershed in relation to the continuity of the riverine corridors affected. Potential impacts to water quality include the direct effects of dredging or filling of streams, rivers, and lakes, as well as indirect effects to water resources resulting from increases in runoff from impervious surfaces (roads, bridges, etc.). A water quality technical report will be prepared to evaluate potential impacts to water resources and will identify the location of impaired stream segments and water bodies in relation to the proposed facilities. The report will identify designated beneficial uses of stream segments affected by the proposed project and areas of significant slope (> 15 percent), which may contribute to erosion and water pollution as a result of uncontrolled runoff. The proposed project may affect federally designated floodplains_ A floodplain evaluation will be prepared to identify the existing floodplain setting, and evaluate potential floodplain impacts and encroachments. The determination of the affected floodplains will be based on the latest available Flood Insurance Rate Maps for incorporated and unincorporated areas of Riverside and San Bernardino County. Land Use and Planning The proposed facilities may have an impact on the residential population and local business community within the project area. A community impact assessment will be prepared to evaluate the potential impacts related to land use and planning within the project study area. Construction of the core facility in undeveloped areas in the cities of Loma Linda, Colton, and Redlands may conflict with local plans and regulations. The analysis of land use compatibility associated with the project shall address consistency with relevant local, regional, and State regulations and plans. Discussions of environmental justice, right-of-way displacements, relocation assistance, business impacts, neighborhood cohesion, and fiscal impacts will be included and sumrnarized in the EIR. The community impact assessment will also evaluate impacts to agricultural resources, including the identification of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance within the Corridor_ 10 203 Noise Noise impacts will be limited to developed areas and sensitive land uses along the proposed facilities. The construction of the proposed facilities may result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels within the Corridor, specifically in the cities of Moreno Valley, Loma Linda and Redlands. Residential areas and areas of sensitive land uses, such as Canyon Springs High School along Pigeon Pass Road, will experience increased noise levels during project construction. Existing noise levels in the vicinity of the proposed facilities will be documented in the EIR. A noise study will be conducted -to assess potential noise impacts, including increased noise exposure resulting from increased vehicular traffic within the Corridor. Construction impacts would result from noise generated by construction equipment such as graders and pile drivers. Population and Housing A community impact assessment will provide a description of housing, employment, and population conditions within the regional vicinity, local communities, and project study area. The preservation of right-of-way for the proposed facilities may result in residential and commercial displacements within the project study area. Residential displacements may occur along Reche Canyon Road, Reche Vista Drive, and Pigeon Pass Road as a result of the proposed arterial improvements. In addition, areas along Riverside Avenue and California Street may experience residential and/or commercial displacements. Discussions of environmental justice, right-of- way displacements, relocation assistance, business impacts, neighborhood cohesion, and fiscal impacts will be included in the community impact assessment and summarized in the EIR. The proposed facilities may indirectly induce economic or population growth through the extension of roads and construction of transportation facilities in previously undeveloped areas. A discussion of potential growth -inducing impacts as a result of the proposed project will be included in the EIR. Public Services and Utilities The EIR will discuss the potential for adverse impacts to public services (fire, police, schools, and other public facilities) and utilities (gas, water, electricity, solid waste, and wastewater). Potential impacts to public services include delays to emergency vehicles during construction, effects on schools, and access to public facilities. Several schools within the project area, such as the Immanuel Baptist School and Canyon Springs High School, will experience indirect impacts as a result of noise from increased vehicular traffic, and may be directly impacted if land acquisition is required. Potential impacts to public utilities include direct impacts where the project may require relocation of existing utilities_ For example, a set of three tower electric transmission lines that cross the core facility at the County line north of the San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill may require relocation as a result of the proposed improvements. Potential impacts to existing public services and utilities will be discussed in the EIR. 11 204 Recreation Impacts to designated parks/recreation areas within the Corridor may occur_ Neighborhood parks such as Colony Park and the Hidden Springs Community Park may experience increased noise levels during construction of the proposed arterial improvements. The Box Springs Mountain Reserve will be directly impacted by the proposed tunnel and its connection to the core facility_ In addition, equestrian trails in the Reche Canyon area may directly impacted by the proposed improvements along Reche Canyon Road. A recreational resources technical report will be prepared and incorporated into the EIR to assess potential impacts to recreation areas. The report will include an evaluation of impacts to existing neighborhood and regional parks and other recreational facilities. Transportation/Traffic While the proposed facilities are expected to have a beneficial effect on regional traffic circulation, the EIR will analyze the effect of the facilities on both regional and local traffic conditions. Adverse impacts may occur on other facilities where traffic volumes are increased as a result of the capacity increase provided by the proposed facilities. A traffic impact analysis will be prepared to evaluate both the beneficial and adverse impacts to transportation and circulation. Cumulative Effects The implementation of the proposed facilities will result in physical impacts to the surrounding natural and urban environment These impacts, when combined with other existing and/or planned projects in the study area, may result in a cumulative impact to specific resources. The EIR will address the potential cumulative impacts for each of the environmental topics discussed above. 12 205 Governments Moreno Valley to Sun Bernardino County Corridor • SAN BAG 4Lhr3,in1 Th eiicr PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC SCOPING MEETINGS FOR THE MORENO VALLEY TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CORRIDOR EIR WITHIN WESTERN RIVERSIDE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES WHAT'S BEING PLANNED? The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) intend to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County Corridor Study. The main purpose of the study is to identify specific transportation solutions that can improve mobility between State Route 60 (SR -60) and Interstate 10 (1-10). Due to the fast pace of development in this area, opportunities are being lost to preserve land for new or expanded transportation facilities_ The objective of the proposed EIR is to provide environmental analysis and disclosure of potential impacts related to proposed transportation improvements within the area generally bounded by 1-10, Riverside Avenue (west of Interstate 215), and SR -60 to allow agencies to proceed with the preservation of transportation facilities within local planning documents. Actual construction of the improvements may be a number of years away. More detailed environmental analysis and supplemental environmental documentation will be required prior to construction of any new or expanded facilities identified through this study. WHY THESE MEETINGS? This is the first step in completing the draft EIR document. SANBAG and RCTC invite interested individuals, organizations, State, and local agencies to provide information about the project area as well as to give them an opportunity to discuss issues or questions they may have about the proposed facilities. An information packet describing the purpose of the project, the project location, and the environmental study area is being mailed to relevant federal, State, regional, and local agencies. Information will be available to the public at the scoping meetings on June 4 and 5, 2003. Information packets may also be requested by contacting Cathy Bechtel (RCTC) or Ty Schuiling (SANBAG). If you would like to be placed on the project mailing list, please send your name and address to Cathy Bechtel (RCTC) or Ty Schuiling (SANBAG). Ms. Bechtel's and Mr. Schuiling's contact information is provided below_ WHERE YOU COME IN Public Comments: Comments should focus on specific social, economic, or environmental concerns. Written comments on the scope of project and impacts to be considered in the EIR document should be submitted to Cathy Bechtel (RCTC) or Ty Schuiling (SANBAG) by June 13, 2003. Written comments may also be submitted at the public scoping meetings on June 4 and 5, 2003. Public comments received will become part of the public record, and each comment will be considered in the environmental document. People with special needs should contact Cathy Bechtel (RCTC) or Ty Schuiling (SANBAG) at the contact information below. The meeting locations are accessible for people with disabilities. WHAT, WHEN AND WHERE The public scoping meetings for the Moreno Valley to San Bemardino County Corridor EIR will be held in an "open -house format," and project representatives will be available to discuss the project throughout the meetings. No formal presentations will be made at the meeting. Informational displays and written materials will be available at the scoping meetings or by request from Cathy Bechtel (RCTC) or Ty Schuiling (SANBAG). The date, time and location of the scoping meetings: Wednesday, June 4, 2003, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. City of Loma Linda Senior Center 25571 Barton Road Loma Linda, California 92354 RTA Bus Route 25 Omnitrans Bus Routes 2 and 200 Thursday, June 5, 2003, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. City of Moreno Valley City Hall 14177 Frederick Moreno Valley, California 92552 RTA Bus Route 16 Please contact Riverside Transit Agency for bus times at 1.800.800.7821 or contact Omnitrans at 1.800.966.6428 CONTACT INFORMATION Cathy Bechtel, RCTC P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Phone: 909.787.7141 FAX: 909.787.7920 cbechtel@rctc.org Ty Schuiling, SANBAG 472 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92401-1421 Phone: 909.884.8276 FAX: 909.885.407 TSchuiling@sanbag.ca.gov 206 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: June 11, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs "Committee as a Whole" Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Status Report on the Winchester to Temecula CETAP Corridor PLANS AND PROGRAMS "COMMITTEE AS A WHOLE" AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file a status report on the Winchester to Temecula CETAP Corridor. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The work on the draft final environmental documents for the Winchester to Temecula CETAP Corridor is progressing on schedule. In order to allow the Federal Highway Administration to take all actions to allow issuance of a Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor by August 15, 2003, a number of key actions must occur over the next few months. Our current schedule identifies completion of the final EIS/EIR by May 30, 2003. We are completing a joint federal and state environmental document under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RCTC is the lead agency for CEQA and will need to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR). While this was originally scheduled to occur at the June 11, 2003 Commission meeting, staff is now scheduling this action for the July 9, 2003 Commission meeting. This will allow time for RCTC to meet its legal requirements under CEQA to provide written proposed responses to public agencies that commented on the Draft EIR at least 10 days prior to certifying the Final EIR (PRC 21092.5). The Federal Highway Administration is scheduled to publish the Notice of Availability of the final EIS on June 20, 2003. A 30 -day public comment period on the document will be provided with the comment period closing on July 22, 2003. This will lead us to completing all work required to allow issuance of a federal Record of Decision by August 15, 2003. Agenda Item 8G 207 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: June 11, 2003 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Plans and Programs "Committee as a Whole" Cathy Bechtel, Director of Transportation Planning and Policy Development THROUGH: Eric Haley, Executive Director SUBJECT: Reconsideration of the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore CETAP Corridor PLANS AND PROGRAMS "COMMITTEE AS A WHOLE" AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve acceleration of the CETAP internal east -west corridor work to a project level environmental document; 2) Direct staff to seek federal legislation identifying the CETAP internal east -west corridor as Ramona/Cajalco, south of Lake Mathews; and, 3) Direct staff to return to the Commission in 90 days with an action plan including details on budget, schedule, and implementation. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) began almost four years ago as part of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP). When the RCIP began in 1999, it was undertaken as a way to expedite the constr-,uction of infrastructure improvements while being cognizant of the importance of quality of life issues for our residents, including open space and conservation of the environment. The RCTC, as the transportation planning agency for the county, was charged with identifying the locations for four new multi -modal transportation facilities under the process known as CETAP. The four priority corridors currently under study are Winchester to Temecula, Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County and Riverside County to Orange County. This agenda item will focus on the Hemet to Corona/Lake Elsinore Corridor (HCLE). A draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/REIR) is currently being prepared for the HCLE corridor. Ten alternative alignments are being considered with the alignments generally grouped Agenda Item 9 295 along Ramona/Cajalco/EI Sobrante in the north and along SR 74 in the southern portion of the study area (14 alternatives were considered in the draft environmental documents; four were dropped prior to the start of the SEIS/REIR preparation). A total of seven public hearings were held to receive public comments on the draft environmental documents and proposed alternatives. Through those hearings, as well as continued public comment received after the formal close of the comment period, much focus has been placed on the alternatives along Ramona/Cajalco/EI Sobrante. In particular, RCTC has received numerous requests for consideration of an alignment south of Lake Mathews. Currently there are four alternatives which travel along Cajalco (la, lb, H1 and H3). The alternative which traversed south of Lake Mathews was actually removed from consideration by the Commission very early in the CETAP alternatives analysis process (June 2000) due to potential conflicts with the existing Stephens Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Reserve, which covers much of the area just east and south of Lake Mathews. Subsequent to that alternative being eliminated, substantial biological analysis and transportation studies have been completed and public comment received for the 14 alternatives that were studied in the Draft EIR/EIS for the HCLE Corridor. Our reports have always noted that the alternatives which provide the greatest transportation benefit are those grouped along Ramona/Cajalco. However, staff has continued to have concerns with the engineering challenges of constructing a large transportation facility along the north side of the Lake Mathews dam. Additionally, we have heard many community concerns regarding construction of a major transportation facility north of the lake and the potential adverse impact it would have on area residents, including displacement of many new residences in this area. The public and local jurisdictions have expressed support for transportation improvements, but recommend they be done south of Lake Mathews. The requirements of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan must be recognized; its Implementation Agreement provides for transportation improvements as long as there is acquisition of occupied SKR habitat to replace disturbed habitat. Back in early 2000, when the RCIP was in its infancy, improvements to Cajalco through the SKR Reserve were thought to be absolutely out of the question. Given the work on the MSHCP and the significant reserve structure that will be formed, additional transportation improvements through this reserve beyond those currently permitted appear to be possible. Staff has been exploring options to determine how best to respond to requests from the public and our member agencies to consider an alternative south of Lake Mathews. If we were to introduce a new alternative into the environmental process at this point for a Tier 1 analysis, the federal NEPA/404 process would require that the new alternative be analyzed at the same level as the other 10 alternatives. This would require an extension to our current schedule (from Agenda Item 9 296 February 2004 to at least February 2005) and an estimated additional $1.5M to complete the analysis. Additionally, while this alternative could be added if we have the support of our partner federal agencies (Federal Highway Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Fish and Wildlife, and the Army Corps of Engineers), there would be no guarantee that this new alternative would be selected as the preferred alternative for right of way preservation in this Tier 1 environmental process. As you will recall, in order to be eligible for future federal dollars for construction, the federal agencies must concur with the preferred alternative. As mentioned earlier, the original reason for CETAP was to expedite the construction of transportation corridors. The Tier 1 process was undertaken to identify needed right of way until funding and support was available for ,future completion of a Tier 2, project level environmental document. Through the public hearing process we heard a great deal of testimony stating that we have significant transportation problems that need fixing today, not 10-20 years from now. The Ramona/Cajalco corridor was identified in our transportation modeling as the corridor that would provide the greatest transportation benefits, and support for improvements along that corridor has been voiced by the public and a number of local jurisdictions. Given the need to make transportation improvements sooner versus later, coupled with RCTC's recent reauthorization of Measure A which identifies some future funding for the CETAP corridors and the Western County's initiation of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) which includes improvements to Ramona/Cajalco, staff is recommending an acceleration of the CETAP process right into a project level NEPA document. Congressman Calvert has expressed support for sponsoring federal legislation which would identify the Ramona/Cajalco alignment, south of the lake, as the CETAP east -west corridor. This would mean the other 10 alternatives would no longer be considered under CETAP and work on the east -west corridor would focus solely on the new alignment. Legislation would be helpful in concentrating the work of the Federal Resource Agencies on the Ramona/Cajalco alignment south of the lake as we move forward on development of a project level environmental document. Currently, this alternative is not identified as a Covered Activity under the draft MSHCP. We must work closely with the County and Resource Agencies to develop language for inclusion in the proposed plan which would outline requirements for coverage of this alternative and/or recognize plans for a future plan amendment. Additionally, an action plan including details on budget, schedule and implementation will be developed and presented for the Commission's consideration in the new few months. Agenda Item 9 297 CETAP has long been a model for environmental streamlining, and as such, has received recognition under President Bush's Executive Order 13274 for Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews. The work completed to date on CETAP for the east -west corridor has been very helpful in identifying the location for much needed transportation improvements. We believe this recommendation to accelerate into a project level document is consistent with the original goal of CETAP and the President's Executive Order --to construct needed transportation corridors in an expedited fashion, while balancing the needs of the community and environment. Agenda Item 9 298 AGENDA ITEM 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: June 16, 2003 Technical Advisory Committee TO: FROM: Shirley Medina, Program Manager 2004 Air Quality Management Plan Transportation Control Measure Appendix SUBJECT: SCAG has been working with the air district to complete the 2004 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). One of the appendices lists all Transportation Control Measure (TCM) projects that are programmed in the RTIP/FTIP. As required in EPA's Transportation Conformity Rule, TCM projects must be implemented in a timely manner. In the SCAG region, this means that TCM projects that are listed in the first two years of the RTIP/FTIP must be implemented in accordance with the year the project is programmed and identified to be complete. If a TCM project won't be implemented, the project must be substituted with another project that will result in an equal or greater amount of emissions reductions. With the 2004 AQMP update, FHWA requested to list individual projects in the TCM appendix. SCAG has generated the attached project list of all TCM projects programmed in the first two years of the 2002 RTIP/FTIP. RCTC staff has reviewed it for accuracy. We request lead agencies to immediately notify RCTC of projects on the TCM list that will be delayed or dropped so that we can work with SCAG on responding to timely implementation issues. 2003 AQMP TCM Projects (from 2002 RTIP) AGENCY PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Start Milestone Project End Date - Year Year — Date - monles are first Beginning Completion programmed Construction Date listed In Date RTIP HOV Improvements - New HOV Lanes, Extensions or Additions To Existing Facilities CALTRANS 1178A IN LOS ANGELES AND CULVER CITY FROM ROUTE 90 TO ROUTE 10 - 2000 2004 HOV LANES (SB 5+0 TO 5+1; NB 5 +0 TO 5+1 HOV) 98CTIP $ FUND NB LN, ALSO PAYS FOR SB $ DELETED FROM 96STIP CALTRANS 16881 IN LA MIRADA TO SANTA FE SPRINGS FROM ORANGE COUNTY LINE 1998 2005 TO ROSECRANS AVENUE - INTERIM HOV LANES; 1-5 Rail Grade Crossing between RTE. 605/91, RIVERSIDE COUNTY 46360 IN RIVERSIDE AND MORENO VALLEY ON SR60 FROM RT 215 TO 2001 2003 2006 TRANS COMMISSION REDLANDS BLVD ADD 2 HOV LANES (RCTC) CALTRANS 5242 1-405 TO LA CO LINE -- ADD ONE HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION . 1998 2003 2004 THIS PROJECT WILL COMPLETE THE 1-605 INTERCOUNTY GAP IN THE HOV SYSTEM IN SO. CALIF. (ITIP PROJECT) CALTRANS 713 1-215 CORRIDOR NORTH - IN SAN BERNARDINO, ON 1-215 FROM RTE 2000 2005 10 TO RTE 30- ADD 2 HOV LANES 1 LANE IN EA. DIR. AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS CALTRANS LA000357 FROM ROUTE 170 TO ROUTE 118 HOV LANES (10 TO 12 LANES) (CFP 2000 2007 345) (2001 CFP 8339) CALTRANS LA000358 FROM ROUTE 134 TO ROUTE 170 HOV LANES (8 TO 10 LANES) (CFP 2000 2007 346)(2001 CFP 8355) CALTRANS LA000359 IN EL MONTE AND BALDWIN PARK FROM BALDWIN AVE TO ROUTE 2000 2003 605 HOV LANES (8+0 TO 8+2) AND TOS PROJECTS. CALTRANS LA000548 FROM PUENTE TO CITRUS HOV LANES FROM 8 TO 10 LANES (C- 1997 2002 ISTEA 77720) (PE ONLY) CALTRANS LA01342 RT 10 FROM RT 605 TO PUENTE AVE HOV LANES(8+0 TO 8+2) 1997 2002 CALTRANS LA01344 RT 5 FROM RT 118 TO RT 14 FROM 10 TO 12 LANES HOV L ANES 1997 2005 CALTRANS LA01348 RT 14 FROM ESCONDIDO CYN RD. TO PEARBLOSSOM HWY HOV 1994 2006 LANES (4 TO 6 LANES) ONE LANE IN EACH DIRECTION. (EA -117101) CALTRANS LA0B875 HOV LANES FROM CITRUS TO ROUTE 57/210 -- P/E ONLY 2002 2003 CALTRANS LA008344 EXTENSION OF N/B 1-405 HOV LANE -TO EXTEND THE HOV LANE ON 2004 2006 N/B 1-405 FROM SOUTH OF VENTURA BL TO SO. BURBANK BLVD WHERE IT WILL JOIN THE EXISTING HOV LANE. (EA199520) 31 CALTRANS LA962201 NEAR SANTA CLARITA, FROM RT 5 TO 126/S.F. RD HOV PRO JECT 1998 2003 (EA# 119843) CALTRANS LA996137 RTE. 60 HOV LNS. FROM RTE. 605 TO BREA CANYON RD. -- HOV 2000 2007 LANE (FROM 8 TO 10 LANES TO 10 TO 12 LANES) (CFP: 358, 4262, 6137=67,150+I I P: 5,100) CALTRANS LA996138 RTE.5 HOV LNS. FROM FLORENCE AVE TO RTE.19 -- ADD ONE LANE 2001 2004 IN EACH DIRECTION HOV Impro vements - New HOV Lanes, With New Facility Projects CALTRANS 20620 UPLAND TO SAN BERNARDINO FROM LOS ANGELES COUNTY LINE 2002 2007 TO ROUTE 215 - 8 LANE FREEWAY 2 HOW LANES (6 + 2) - 210 CORRIDOR PROJECT (Master record includes projects 44301, 20621, 44311, 44321, 44331, 44340, SBD0194) CALTRANS 10167 1-5 FROM SR -91 TO LA COUNTY LINE IN BUENA PARK - ADD 1 MIXED 2000 2005 2008 FLOW LN AND 1 HOV LN IN EACH DIRECTION. FROM 6 - 0 TO 8 - 2 LANES. CALTRANS 2009 NEAR SOUTH PASADENA FROM ROUTE 10 TO ROUTE 210 - PARTIAL 1992 2002 RIGHT OF WAY FOR NEW 6 LANE FREEWAY WITH 2 HOV LANES CALTRANS 354801 JCT RTE 15 TO VALLEY WAY - ADD 1 HOV LN AND 1 M/ F LN IN EA. 2002 2004 2006 DIR. INCLUDING OPERATIONAL STRIPING (IN SBD CNTY 9.05 - 9.95 & AT THE EAST END) ALSO WIDEN 5 UC'S & 1 OH CALTRANS LA0B951 ROUTE 10 TO ROUTE 60 -- EXPRESSWAY TO FREEWAY 2002 2009 CONVERSION -- ADD 1 HOV LANE AND 1 MIXED FLOW LANE . (2001 CFP 8349, TCRP #50) CALTRANS LA195900 RTE. 405 - WATERFORD AVE. TO RTE 10 - AUX LANE: L OS ANGELES - 2001 2007 WATERFORD AV. TO RTE 10 - CONSTRUCT S/B AUX LANE & SIB HOV LANE (2001 CFP 8354) CALTRANS LA963724 IN LA VERNE AND CLAREMONT, FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO 1999 2003 SAN BERNAR- DINO COUNTY LINE - CONSTRUCT 8 -LANE FREEWAY INCLUDING 2-HOV LANES (12620, 12640, 12630, 10501, 17210) CALTRANS ORA000195 ON SR -22 (1-405 TO SR55) ADD 2 HOV LANES/1 EA DIR (FRM 0 - 2); & 2 2003 2004 2007 AUX LANES/1 EA DIR (FRM 0- 2) (1-5 TO BEACH) & OPERATING IMPROVMENTS (SEE COMMENTS) 32 HOV Improvements - New HOV Lanes, with Facility Improvement Projects CALTRANS 0121D ON I-215/SR91/SR60, RIV 1215 COR IMPROV PROJ - FROM 60/91/215 2002 2004 2007 JCT TO 60/215 SPLIT - WIDEN 6 TO 8 LNS, INCLUDING MAINLINE/IC IMPROVS, ADD HOV, AUX, & SB TRUCK CLIMB LN (EA: 3348U1) CALTRANS 11985 NEAR HAWTHORNE AND CULVER CITY FROM ROUTE 105 TO ROUTE 2002 2003 90 - 6 LANE FREEWAY, ADD 2 HOV LANES AND SOUNDWALLS . CALTRANS LA000543 IN POMONA AND CLAREMONT FROM ROUTE 57 TO SAN 2000 2005 BERNARDINO COUNTY LINE HOV LANE IN EACH DIRECTION (C -I: 77719; CFP 350; PPNO 00362) ALSO SOUNDWALL AND REHAB CALTRANS LA0B7215 RTE 5 CORRIDOR WIDENING & RECONSTRUCT IC SEGMENT A - OCL 2001 2004 TO RTE 710 WIDEN FROM 6 TO 10 LNS (1 HOV & ONE MF IN EA . DIR). VALLEY VIEW & CARMENITA IC; MODIFY FWY TO FWY IC @ RTE 605 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA996390 SEPULVEDA BLVD. FROM CENTINELA AVE, TO LINCOLN BLVD - 2002 2004 WIDEN SEPUL BLVD. BET, LINCOLN AND CENTINELA TO PROVIDE BUS/CARPOOL PRIORITY LANE. GARDEN GROVE ORA981104 RECONSTRUCT HARBOR BLVD INTERCHANGE. 4 LANES EACH 1999 2004 2007 DIRECTION. (1/4 MILE BEFORE AND AFTER SR -22 RAMPS) 2 HOV LNES(1 E/B & 1 W/B) AND PROPOSED SR -22 HOV LANES. ORANGE, CITY OF ORA990443 SR -22 AND CITY DRIVE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS, 2002 2004 2007 RECONFIGURE FREEWAY INTERCHANGE AT SR -22 FROM SR -57 TO LEWIS STREET -- FROM 6/0 TO 6/2 LANES (ADDING 2 HOV LANES) HOV Improv ements - HO V Bypasses , Connectors, New Interchanges with Ramp Meters COSTA MESA 3090 IN CITY OF COSTA MESA _NOS 2&3) N/B I-405/BRISTOL OFF -RAMP 2000 2003 2006 AND S/B RTE -55 TO N/B I-405_(NORTH TRNSTWY) WIDEN NB OFF RAMP BRAID WITH HOV CONNECTOR_FROM 6 TO 8 LANES CALTRANS 12570 RTE. 57/60 HOV CONNECTOR INDUSTRY FROM OLD BREA CANYON 2000 2003 ROAD TO GRAND AVENUE - HOV DIRECT CONNECTORS AND COLLECTOR ROAD (BOTH DIRECTIONS) CALTRANS 6951 405/55 INTERCHANGE SOUTH TRANSITWAY MOS1_EXISTING 4 2000 2002 2004 MIXED 1 HOV_ON SR55 AND 1-405 EXIST IS 5 MF AND 1 HOV ADD HOV DIRECT TRANSITWAY FROM SR55 TO 1-405 CALTRANS LA996134 RTE. 5/14 INTERCHANGE & HOV LNS ON RTE. 14 -- CONSTRUCT 2 2001 2004 ELEVATED LANES -- HOV CONNECTOR (ROW) ONLY (DIRECT CONNECTORS) (EA# 16800)(2001 CFP 8343) ANAHEIM ORA000100 GENE AUTRY WAY WEST@ I-5 (1-5 HOV TRANSITWAY TO HASTER) 1999 2002 2005 ADD OVERCROSSING ON 1-5 (S)/MANCHESTER AND EXTEND GENE AUTRY WAY WEST FROM 1-5 TO HARBOR. RIVERSIDE CITY RIV0084 AT VAN BUREN ST IC RECONSTRUCT RAMPS (INCLDS HOV RAMPS), 2001 2004 WIDEN OC ON VAN BUREN FROM 4 TO 6 LN & ADD AUX LANES; ADD NEW EB ONRAMP W/ENTRANCE @ INDIANA 33 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes and Pricing Alternatives TCA 10254 SJHC, 15 MI TOLL RD BETWEEN 1-5 IN SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO & RTE 73 IN IRVINE, EXISTING 3/M/F EA.DIR.1 ADD'L M/F EA DIR, PLUS CLIMBING & AUX LNS AS REQ, BY 2015 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/5/01 TCA ORA052 (FTC -S) (1-5 TO OSO PKWY) (15M1) 2 MF EA. DIR BY 2010; AND 2 ADDITIONAL M/F EA. DIR. PLS CLMBNG & AUS LANES AS REQ BY 2015 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/05/01, TCA ORA051 (FTC -N) ( OSO PKWY TO ETC) (13M1) EXISTING 2 MF IN EA. DIR, 2 ADDITIONAL M/F LANES, PLS CLMBNG & AUX LANS AS REQ BY 2015 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/05/01. TCA ORA050 ETC (RTE 241/261/133) ( RTE 91T0 I-5/JAMBOREE) EXISTING 2 M/F EA.DIR, 2 ADD'L M/F IN EA, DIR, PLUS CLIMB AND AUX LNS AS REQ, BY 2015 PER SCAG/TCA MOU 4/05/01. Transit - Rail Track, New Lines LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA CALTRANS LA0C10 LA29212X LA963519 2003 2003 2003 2003 MID-CITY/EXPOSITION CORRIDOR LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT -TO 2002 VERMONT METRO RAIL BLUE LINE - PASADENA EXT UNION STA TO SIERRA 2001 MADRE VILLASTA 13. 5 MILES, 12 STATIONS ADD 3 MILES OF TRIPLE TRACK AT BANDINI, MP 148.5 & 151.7 2001 BETWEEN FULLERTON & LAUS Transit - Rail Track, Capacity Expansion of Existing Lines COMMERCE LA963759 TELEGRAPH ROAD TRACK CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT 97-98 TCI Transit New Rolling Stock Acquisition SOUTHERN CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA SOUTHERN CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY LA963758 LA990305 RIV011242 PURCHASE METROLINK CARS & LOCOMOTIVES 1997 2001 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT FLEET- 50 NEW RAIL C AR AND CONTINUATION 2001 OF THE LA CAR RAIL PURCHASE PURCHASE EXPANSION ROLLING STOCK (2 CAB CARS AND 3 2002 LOCAMOTIVES)FOR METROLINK IEOC AND RIVERSIDE/FULLERTON/LA LINES (EA:RIVFUL.PPNO; 0079E 2005 2005 2005 2005 2015 2015 2015 2015 2008 2003 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 34 Transit - Express Busways, Bus Rapid Transit and Dedicated Bus Lanes LOS ANGELES LA29202U1 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY EAST/WEST BRT (FROM THE TERMINUS COUNTY MTA OF THE METRO RED LINE HEAVY RAIL IN NO HOLLYWOOD TO WARNER CENTER)14-MILE EXCLUSIVE BUS LANES LOCATED IN FORMER RAIL ROAD ROW LOS ANGELES LA29202U2 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY NORTH/SOUTH BRT EXTENSION COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY (OCTA) LA29202V LA29202W ORA194 2003 2003 EASTSIDE TRANSIT CORRIDOR - UNION STATION TO ATLANTIC VIA 2002 1ST ST, TO LORENA, THEN 3RD ST, VIA 3RD/BEVERLY BLVD, TO ATLANTIC (EASTSIDE LRT) MID -CITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR: WILSHIRE BLVD. FROM VERMONT 2001 TO SANTA MONICA DOWNTOWN- MID -CITY WILSHIRE BRT CENTRAL ORANGE COUNTY FIXED GUIDEWY (CENTERLINE) FOR 2002 CONSTRUCTION FROM IRVINE TRANSPORTATION CENTER TO SANTA ANA TRANSPORTATION CENTER , Transit - Buses, Fleet Expansion OMNITRANS 200077 LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA CULVER CITY MUNI BUS LINES NORWALK PASADENA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY LONG BEACH PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY LA01B101 LA01B120 LA026 LAOB0841 LAOB215 LAOB303 LA0B304 LAOB7004 LAOB7006 BUS SYSTEM - PURCHASE EXPANSION ALT FUEL BUSES (01-13), 2002 (02-14) COOPERATIVE PURCHASE OF HYBRID ELECTRIC COACHES BY 2002 MTA AND INTERESTED MUNICIPAL OPERATORS AS A TEST PROGRAM ( 2001 CFP 8116 ) EXPANSION OF DIVISION 1 TO ADD ADDITIONAL CAPACITY OF 2002 APPROX 67 BUSES AND ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE OF EMPLOYEES. ACQUISITION OF A VACANT PARCEL SOUTH OF DIV 1 PROCUREMENT OF TWO (2) 30' CNG EXPANSION BUSES FOR 2002 SERVICE PURCHASE TWO (2) 40 -FT GILLIG + SHORTFALL 2001 PURCHASE OF (5) 30 -FOOT ALTERNATIVE FUEL EXTENSION 2000 VEHICLES (GTIP) ACQUISITION OF TROLLEY BUSES (2) AND CHARGING STATIONS 2002 FOR THE CITY OF MONROVIA'S DOWNTOWN TROLLEY SERVICE PLAYA VISTA EARNMARK, PURCHASE NEW (5) LOW -EMISSION 2002 BUSES, TRACKING EQUIP & BUS AMENITIES INCLUDING PASSENGER SHELTERES, INFO KIOSKS & APPURTENANT EQUIP - TRANSIT SERVICE UPGRADE, VEHICLE ACQUISITION FOR EAST LOS ANGELES FIXED ROUTE 2000 SHUTTLE SERVICE PHASE II -PURCHASE OF 3 VEHICLES WILL INCREASE FREQUENCY OF THE EXISTING 3 SHUTTLES SERVICE ROUTES LONG BEACH TRANSIT EXPANSION BUSES - THE PUR CHASE OF UP 2001 TO 11 40 -FOOT, LOW -FLOOR LNG ALTERNATIVE FUEL BUSES WHICH SERVE THE MOST CROWDED ROUTES, INCLUDING 2005 2005 2007 2008 2006 2010 2002 2006 2003 2004 2003 2003 2004 2004 2002 2003 35 190,7,100 & 171_ ANTELOPE VALLEY LA0B7008 TRANSIT AUTHORITY BALDWIN PARK LO S ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF NORWALK GLENDALE LOS ANGELES, CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES, CITY OF NORWALK BURBANK MONTEBELLO MONTEBELLO BURBANK LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA 3 EXPANSION 40 FT. LOW FLOOR CLEAN DIESEL BUSES; LOCAL FIRXED-ROUTE BUSES; TO RELIEVE PAEK PERIOD OVERCROWDING ON CORE ROUTES. LA0B7012 LOCAL NTD REPORTERS' BUS FLEET EXPANSION.19 BUSES FOR 5 2000 CITIES. BALDWIN PARK, COMPTON, EL MONTE, MONTEREY PARK & WEST COVINA (CNG,DIESEL & PROPANE FUEL 30-35 FT. VEH). LA0B7024 METRO RED LINE MELROSE SHUTTLE -ACQUISITION OF 2 LOW 2000 FLOOR, PROPANE -POWERED, 30 -FOOT BUSES WILL BE USED IN THE OPERATION OF A NEW HIGH FREQUENCY SHUTTLE LA0B7026 METRO RED LINE/WEST HOLLYWOOD/BEVERLY CENTER/CEDER 2000 SINAI SHUTTLE -ACQUIRE 7 NEW 30 -FOOT, PROPANE -FUELED, DASH STYLE BUSES FOR THE OPERATION OF A HIGH FREQUENCY SHUTTLE LA0C71 PURCHASE OF (4) FOUR ALTERNATIVELY FUELED EXPANSION 2003 BUSES. LA008220 PURCHA SE OF (8) 35 -FOOT LOW FLOOR CNG HEA VY-DUTY 2003 TRANSIT VEHICLES, LA008241 PICO UNION/ECHO PARK DASH VEHICLE PROCUREMENT. 2001 PURCHASE (3) LOW -FLOOR, PROPANE -POWERED 30' BUSES FOR THE PICO/UNION ECHO PARK SHUTTLE SERVICE. LA008371 SANTA CLARITA TRANSIT EXPANSION BUSES; WILL ALLOW PHASE 2003 1 OF 5 YEAR MASTER PLAN TO BE IMPLEMENTED WITH SEVEN LOCAL BUSES AND FOUR COMMUTER BUSES. LA008385 EL SERENO DASH PROCUREMENT. PURCHASE (2) LOW -FLOOR, 2001 PROPANE POWERED, 30' FOOT BUSES FOR THE EL SERENO DASH SERVICE. LA0D01 NORWALK ON BEHALF OF SANTA FE SPRINGS - ALTERNATIVE 2002 FUEL VEHICLES AND TRANSIT RELATED FACILITIES. LA0D25 PROCUREMENT OF (3) ALTERNATIVE FUEL TRANSIT VEHICLES 2002 LA0D28 PURCHASE OF (1) EXPANSION BUS. ONE HYBRID (DIESEL- 2003 ELECTRIC) LOW FLOOR 40' COACH FOR INSERVICE TESTING. LA55012 REPLACE BUSES- 2000 (5) 40' BUSES AND (10) 40' EXPANSION 2001 BUSES LA8STIP13 BURBANK LOCAL TRANSIT PURCHASE OF THREE ALT. FUEL 1997 BUSES FOR ONGOING TDM PROGRAM LA963542 ACQUISTION REVENUE VEHICLES - 2,513 CLEAN FUEL BUSES: 2001 LEASED VEH, FY02 (370); +30 HC; FY03 -FY06 TOTAL OF 516 LA990306 RAPID BUS PROGRAM - 4 - FORTY FOOT BUSES. ALSO FACILITY: 2001 BUS STOP DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, TECHNOLOGY UPGRADING, OPERATING SUPPORT, 2002 2003 2005 2002 2002 2004 2005 2004 2008 2006 2004 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 2007 36 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY GLENDALE ANAHEIM ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY (OCTA) ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY (OCTA) CORONA RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY LA996000 LA996001 LA996002 LA996003 LA996004 LA996005 LA996006 LA996007 LA996010 LA996011 LA996044 LA996065 0 RA010202 O RA020105 DASH PICO UNION/ ECHO PRK VEH ACQ PURCHASE ONE BUS TO RELIEVE OVERCROWDING DASH EL SERENO/CTY TERR VEH ACQ PURCHASE2 BUSES TO REDUCE OVERCROWDING DASH WILMINTON VEH ACQUISITION PURCHASE 2 BUSES TO RELIEVE OVERCROWDING DASH WATTS VEH ACQUISITION PURCH 2 VEH'S TO REDUCE EXISTING OVERCROWDING DASH KING -EAST VEH ACQUISITION FINANCE THE ACQ OF 5 BUSES TO REDUCE OVERCROWDING DASH HLLYWOOD VEH ACQUISITION ACQUIRE TWO BUSES TO REDUCE EXISTING OVERCROWDING DASH VERMNT-MAIN VEH ACQUISITION PURCH 5 BUSESTO RELIEVE EXISTING OVERCROWDING DASH MANCHSTR-FLORNCE VEH ACQ PURCH 5 BUSES TO RELIEVE EXISTING OVERCROWDING COMM EXPRESS 448 VEH ACQUISITION PURCH 3 BUSES TO REDUCE EXISTING OVERCROWDING ROWAN SHUTTLE VEH ACQUISITION PURCH 2 BUSES TO REDUCE EXISTING OVERCROWDED CONDITIONS VEH ACQ FOR EST L.A. SHUTTLE PURCH 4 VEH'S TO REMEDY EXISTING OVERCROWDED CONDITIONS CNG HVY DUTY TRANSIT VEHICLES PURCH 6 BUSES TO REMEDY EXISTING OVERCROWDING PURCHASE (10) 22 FOOT ELECTRIC BUSES FOR ANAHEIM RESORT AREA HYBRID ELECTRIC URBAN 40 FT BUSES (10) EXPANSION ORA020107 60 FT ARTICULATED BUSES (20) RIV010511 RIV000605 RIV010512 RIV020601 CITY OF CORO NA -- PURCHA SE 3 EXPANSION VEHICLES -- RED LINE FIXED ROUTE DEBT FINANCING FOR 57 TRANSIT COACHES, 25 REPLACEMENT, 32 EXPANSION IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PURCHASE TEN REPLACEMENT AND 2 EXPANSION 40' BUSES AND 20 BUS SHELTERS IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PURCHASE TEN 30' EXPANSION ALT FUEL BUSES IN FY 02/03. Transit - Shuttles and Paratransit Vehicles, Fleet_Ex pansion OMNITRANS LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA 2002171 LA0B7023 (1) EXPA NSION PARATRANSIT VAN GET ABOUT FLEET IMPROVE (POMONA VAL TRANS. AUTHORITY) - PURCHASE 18, 21 PASSENGER VEHIC TO INCR CAPACITY OF 1999 1999 1999 1999 2000 1999 2001 2000 2001 2001 1999 1999 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2001 2002 2002 2001 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2006 2003 2006 2006 2003 2003 2002 2004 2005 2005 2005 2003 2006 2003 2004 2003 37 VARIOUS AGENCIES LA0B860 VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES PALOS VERDES ESTATES SIERRA MADRE NORWALK ACCESS SERVICES INC. VARIOUS AGENCIES VARIOUS AGENCIES CRANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (OCTD) VARIOUS AGENCIES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIVERSIDE CITY LA0B863 LA0C23 LA0C25 LA0C30 LA0C31 LA0C33 LA0C34 LA0C35 LA008226 LA008372 LA0D02 LA900520 LA973039 LA990744 O RA020119 ORA020125 RIV010908 RIV020605 SUBREG PARATRANSIT SYS KOREAN HEALTH EDUCATION INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER. EXPANSION VEHICLES - THREE 10 PASSENGER SMALL BUSES. VILLA ESPERANZA. EXPANSION VEHICLE - ONE 17 PASSENGER MEDIUM BUS. HEALTHVIEW - EXPANSION VEHICLE - (1) 17 -PASSENGER MEDIUM BUS 0 ULTRALIFE ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE- EXPANSION VEHICLE - (1) 10 -PASSENGER SMALL BUS. ULTRALIFE ADULT DAY HEALTH CARE - EXPANSION VEHICLES - (2) 5 -PASSENGER M INIVANS. WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER - EXPANSION VEHICLES - (5) 10 -PASSENGER SMALL BUSES. WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER •• EXPANSION VEHICLE - (1) 5 - PASSENGER MINIVAN. WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER - EXPANSION VEHICLE - (1) 17 - PASSENGER MEDIUM BUS. PV TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 11. PURCHASE 3 EXPANSION CLEAN -FUEL VEHICLES. EXPANSION OF SIERRA MADRE BUS ROUTE. PURCHASE OF 3 CNG VANS TO EXPAND SIERRA MADRE ROUNDABOUT SYSTEM. PURCHA SE (2) EXPANSION PARATRANSIT VEHICLES PURCHASE OF ADD'L 591 VEHICLES FROM FY01 TO FY05. 110 VEHICLES IN FY01, 161 VEHICLES IN FY02, 125 VEHICLES IN FY03, 149 VEHICLES IN FY04, AND 92 VEHICLES IN FY05. ACESS SERVICES INC, FLEET EXPANSION VEHICLES 46 MINI -- VANS KOREAN HEALTH, EDUCATION, INFO & RESEARCH CENTER (KHEIR)- EXPANSION THREE (3) 17 -PASSENGER SMALL BUSES . PURCHASE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES EXPANSION (11) 2001 2003 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2001 2003 2002 2000 2002 2001 2002 (5) EXPANSION MINIVANS WITH RADIOS, (5) EXPANSION MODIFIED 2002 VA NS WITH RADIOS, (1) RADIO BASE STATION, (1) SET OF SERVER AND SOFTWARE. IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR EXCEED, A DIVISION OF 2002 VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER - PURCHASE 6 EXPANSION MINIVANS AND 6 RADIOS - SECTION 5310 FY 2001/02 CYCLE IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE 2002 SPECIAL SERVICES - PURCHASE 2 EXPANSION 25' TWELVE PASSENGER DIAL -A -RIDE VEHICLES 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2005 2007 2003 2005 2002 2003 2003 2005 2003 2004 38 RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV020902 TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIVERSIDE TRANSIT RIV32666 AGENCY OMNITRANS SBD31088 IN WEST RIV CO FOR EXCEED, A DIVISION OF VALLEY RESOURCE 2002 2004 CENTER - PURCHASE 1 EXPANSION 20' MODIFIED VAN, 1 EXPANSION 22' MEDIUM BUS, AND RADIOS - SECTION 5310 FY 02/03 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PURCHASE 10 EXPANSION AND 2002 2004 14 PASSENGER DAR VANS IN 02/03 BUS FLEET EXPANSION -PURCHASE 40' EXPANSION COACHES & 2002 2003 AUXILLARY EQUIPMENT, CNG 01-9, 03-1 (NOTE: 'OTHER' ARE CARL MOYER FUNDS) - (Note: The 'OTHER' FUNDS ARE CARL MAYER FUNDS) lntermodal Transfer Facilities - Rail Stations, New RIVERSIDE COUNTY 0006S METROLINK - SAN BERNARDINO SUBDIVISION TIER 11 NEW 2001 TRANS COMMISSION STATIONS AT MAIN ST IN CORONA (RCTC) LOS ANGELES LA29202X METRO RED LINE MOS-3: N. HOLLYWOOD 5,9 -MILE W/ 3 STATIONS, 1996 COUNTY MTA HIGHLAND TO N.HOLLYWOOD STA. 15,370+ 746= 16,117 118,630+5,754=124,384 BUENA PARK ORA55286 COMMUTER RAIL STATION (DALE STREET AND MALVERN) IN 2002 BUENA PARK. CONSTRUCT NEW RAIL STATION. 308 PARKING SPACES. LAGUNA NIGUEL ORA9530 MISSION VIEJO/LAGUNA NIGUEL STATION LOS ANGELES/SAN 1995 DIEGO CORRIDOR YORBA LINDA ORA981103 IN YORBA LINDA, CONSTRUCT COMMUTER RAIL STATION AND 2000 PARK AND RIDE (347 SPACES) - NEAR ESPERANZA RD AND NEW RIVER ST Intermodal Transfer Facilities - Rail Statio ns, Expansion PASADENA LA0B7270 LOS ANGELES, CITY LA008173 OF COVINA LA008216 FOOTHILL TRANSIT LA008362 ZONE BLUE LINE PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS -IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN 2000 ACCESS TO PLANNED BLUE LINE STATIONS IN THE CITY OF PASADENA, LOCATED ALONG THE PASADENA BLUE LINE ALIGNMENT NORTHRIDGE METROLINK STN PARKING IMPRVMENT. CONSTRCT 2003 ADDT'L 100 PRKING SPCS & RECONFIGURE SOUTHERN PRTION OF EXISTNG PRKNG LOT TO YIELD AN ADDT'L 40 NET PRKING SPCES TOTAL 400 SPC. MITIGATE PARKING DEFICIENCY FOR COVINA METROLINK 2002 STATION -PROJECT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT 330 NEW PARKING SPACES IN A STRUCTURE OVER AN EXISTING STATION PARKING LOT. EL MONTE STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT -FUNDING WILL 2002 PROVIDE FOR NEW LIGHTING, INFORMATION SIGNAGE, AND OTHER PASSENGER AMENITIES. 2004 2002 2004 2003 2002 2006 2003 2005 2003 2007 2006 2003 39 ANTELOPE VALLEY LA960204 TRANSIT AUTHORITY GLENDALE LA963751 LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES, CITY LA974165 OF COMMERCE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV011234 TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV52008 TRANS COMMISSION ;RCTC) RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV62044 TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) MONTCLAIR TRANSIT FACILITY IMPROVEMENT METROLINK - SANTA CLARITA LINE GLENDALE TRANSPORTATION CENTER - UPGRADE STATION 96-97 TCI LA963755 CHINATOWN INTERMODAL IMPROVEMENT TO DEVELOP A CONNECTION FROM BLUE LINE - PASADENA (CHINATOWN STATION TO BROADWAY STREET) 97-98 TCI MACARTHUR PARK STA TION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PLAZA TO ACCOMODATE PUBLIC ACCESS (PEDESTRIAN ENTRABCES, WALKWAYS, BICYCLE FACILITIES) R615TA METROLINK - RIV/LA VIA FULLERTON AT COMMERCE METROLINK STATION - PLATFORM CONSTRUCTION R616TA METROLINK - SANTA CLARITA LINE AT VINCENT HILL/ACTON UPGRADE METROLING STATION - INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CANOPY, PAVING, LIGHTING AT LA SIERRA METROLINK STATION • PURCHASE UP TO 21.19 ACRES TO EXPAND EXISTING PARKING FROM 348 SPACES ULTIMATELY 2000 SPACES (FIRST 2 PHASES UP TO 1,050 SPACES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONSTRUCT PASSENGER OVERCROSSINGS AND SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS @ WEST CORONA, LA SIERRA, AND PEDLEY METROLINK/ PARK -N -RIDE STATIONS PEDLEY PLATFORM EXTENSION 1998 2001 1997 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002 2002 SBD990305 METROLINK/SAN BERNARDINO LINE CONSTRUCT A SECOND 2000 PLATFORM, PASSENGER SHELTERS AND INFORMATION KIOSKS Intermodal Transfer Facilities - Park & Ride Lo ts, New OMNITRANS 981119 LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE SOUTHERN CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY LA000487 LA000489 LAOB311 LAOB7009 TRANSIT INTERMODAL FACILITIES - FONTANA TRANSCENTER - 2002 EXPAND BUS BAYS, IMPROVE LANDSCAPING, SIGNALS AND PEDESTRIAN AND PASSENGER FACILITIES PARK A ND RIDE LOT (850 SPACES) LANKERSHIM AND CHANDLER - 1994 METRO RED LINE PARK AND RIDE LOT (700 SPACES) UNIVERSAL CITY - METRO RED 1994 LINE PARK AND RIDE FACILITY ON OAK STREET BETWEEN VINCENT & 2002 GLENDORA. 160 PARKING SPACES SERVING BUS LINES #699 AND #272. ANTELOPE VALLEY LINE I MPROVEMENTS- INCREASE C AP ACITY 2001 AND REDUCE TRAVEL TIME ON THIS COMMUTER RAIL AND FREIGHT SERVICE LINE BETWEEN LANCASTER AND LOS ANGELES 2002 2004 2006 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2002 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2002 40 SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CARSON, CITY OF MONROVIA EL MONTE PALMDALE PALMDALE LA0B7020 LA0B7034 LA0B7107 LA0C09 LA0C53 LA008219 LA008250 LA008323 LA008326 LA008361 LA29204 LA962129 LONG BEACH PUBLIC LA008383 SOUTHERN CALIF REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA962148 ADDITIONAL (150) PARKING AT NEWHALL METROLINK STATION- 2001 CONSTRUCT ADEQUATE PARKING AT THE NEWHALL METROLINK STATION, INCLUDE PARK & RIDE, KISS & RIDE AND DISABLED - ACCESS SPACES SUN VALLEY INTERMODAL TRANSIT CENTER; PEDESTRIAN 2001 CROSSING/BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT -PROVIDE PED. CROSSINGS AT EACH END OF THE PLATFORM OF SOON TO BE BUILT SUN VALLEY METROLINK STATION CHATSWORTH INTERMODAL PARK AND RIDE -INCLUDE DESIGN 2001 AND CONS. OF ADDITIONAL 150 SPACES -CONSTRUCTION WILL INCL GRADING, ASPHALT PAVING, INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE BUMPERS ETC (PE ONLY) TRANSIT CENTER PASSENGER AMENITIES 2001 HOLLYWOOD INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC 2002 PARKING CENTER ON HAWTHORNE AVE. BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND NORTH ORANGE DRIVE. SOUTH BAY PAVILION REGIONAL TRANSIT CTR. CONSTRUCTION 2001 OF A TRANSIT CTR AT THE SOUTH BAY PAVILION SHOPPING CTR TO BE SERVED BY ALL 8 CARSON CIRCUIT RTES & MTA LINES #205 & #446-447. MONROVIA RAILROAD DEPOT MULTI -MODAL T RANSIT CENTER; 2002 STABILIZING STRUCTURE AND THEN OVERALL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WILL BE REPAIRED FOLLOWED BY RESTORING KEY ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. SAN GABRIEL VALLEY METRO HUB -IMPLEMENT NEW 2001 TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES, INCLUDING AN ELECTRIC BIKE/SHUTTLE SERVICE/PARKING CONTROL PROGRAM. PALMDALE TRANSPORTATION CENTER COMMUTER SERVICE 2001 CENTER -A REGIONAL MULTI -MODAL TRANSIT FACILITY IS CURRENTLY IN DESIGN. PALMDALE TRANSIT AMENITIES PROGRAM, PROVIDE BUS 2001 SHELTERS ALONG VARIOUS REGIONAL AND LOCAL STOPS WITHIN THE CITY OF PALMDALE. LONG BEACH TRANSIT: BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PROJ. ENHANCE 9 2001 OF RAIL STATION FEEDER BUS STOPS TO EASE TRANSFERS, MAKE PUBLIC TRANSIT MORE AESTHETICALLY PLEASING & SAFER, INC RIDERSHIP. LA -SAN BERNARDINO CR (SF UNION STATION -SAN BERNARDINO) 1997 CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS METROLINK ROW MITIGATION PEDESTRIAN & CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS WESTLAKE COM MUNITY BASED INTERCEPT INTERMODAL FACILITY (96 CALL, CAT 2) [CALL #2445] 1993 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004 2006 2005 2003 2004 2007 2004 2002 2002 1999 2003 41 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF FOOTHILL TRANSIT ZONE COVINA DOWNEY INGLEWOOD LDS ANGELES, CITY OF ORANGE COUNTY TRANS AUTHORITY (OCTA) FULLERTON LOS ANGELES, CITY CF HEMET CHINO LA962445 WESTLAKE COM MUNITY BASED INTERCEPT INTERMODAL FACILITY LA963762 COVINA TIMED TRANSFER CENTER JOINT DEVELOP. PRJ. W/CITY W. COVINA PARK & RIDE GARAGE, TRANSFER CTR. & RETAIL KIOSKS LA9811080 EASTLAND SATELLITE PARK n RIDE LOT (REPLACEMENT PA RKING FOR EASTLAND SHOPPING CENTER -- 429 SPACES) (CROSS STREETS ARE BARRANCA/WORKMAN) LA982251 DEVELOP DOWNEY TRANSPO/TRANSIT CTR AND TRANSIT YARD- 2000 BUS SYSTEMS, M ETROLINK, AND LIGHT RAIL ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS- LA TO ORANGE CO INTERMODAL FACILITY- 68,000 SQ/FT - NANCE/LORENA LA990701 PA SSENGER TRANSFER FACILITY: OFF STREET, NE CRNR OF LA 2000 BREA & KELSO. WILL NOT ADD NEW S\/C. PROVIDES SAFE OFF STREET TRANSFER FOR PASSENGERS.INGLEWOOD BUS. TRANSIT CENTER PHASE 2. LA996439 BICYCLE RACK AND PARKING PHASE II INSTALL ESTIMATED 833 1999 INVERTED BIKE RACKS, ORA00010 TRANSITWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT IRVINE TRANSPORTATION 2001 4 CENTER; BUILD 900 SPACE PARKING STRUCTURE, INCLUDING ENVIRONMENTAL, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION. ORA02011 FULLERTON TRAIN STATION - PARKING STRUCTURE, PHASE I AND 2002 3 II. TOTAL OF 670 SPACES. R627TA METRO RAIL RED LINE AT WESTLAKE COMMUNITY INTERMODAL 1998 INTERCEPT FACILITY- DESIGN 1,100 SPACE PARKING STRUCTURE CROSSSTREETS ARE ALVARADO/MACARTHUR RIV990708 CONSTRUCT TRANSPORTATION/ TRANSIT CENTER/PARK-N-RIDE 2002 LOT ON CORNER OF HARVARD AND LATHAM AVE, APP 100 SPACES SBD41220 CHINO AVENUE/CENTRAL TO 6TH STS. MULTI -MODAL 2002 TRANSPORTATION CENTER INCLUDES PARK -N -RIDE LOT WITH 125 SPACES(PHASE 1 FUNDED -PHASE 2 AWAITING FUNDING) Intermodal Transfer Facilities - Park & Ride Lots, Expansion LOS ANGELES, CITY OF NO RWALK LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA LA008303 LA0D04 LA210465 2001 2002 2000 ANGELS FLIGHT RAILWAY PLAZA. ENHNCMENT OF SYSTM & DEVT 2002 OF LOWER PLAZA INCL KIOSKS, INCLDS INSTALLING, WAITING & SEATING AREAS, LIGHTING, CNNCTIONS BET HILL ST & ADJCENT RED LINE ST NORWALK/SANTA FE SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION CENTER 2002 EXPA NSION - PARKING & RELATED IMPROVE MENTS SO. CENTRAL LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK INTERMODAL 2001 URBAN ACCESS PRJ (STATE OF CAL. DEPT. OF GEN. SERV .) RENEW /RENOVATION PARKING FACILITY IMPROVE PARK/TRAFFIC ACCESS PROGRAM 2003 2006 2002 2003 2002 2002 2002 2002 2006 2009 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2003 42 Intermodal Transfer Facilities - Bus Stations & Transfer Facilities, New MONTEBELLO LA000504 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF ON BOARD BIKE RACKS. LONG BEACH PUBLIC LA01B110 BIKE RACKS ON BUSES TRANSPORTATION COMPANY LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA008329 BICYCLE RACKS ON COMMUTER EXPRESS BUSES. ADDITION OF FRONT -LOADING BICYCLE RACKS TO A TOTAL OF 93 COMMUTER EXPRESS BUSES AND SPARES THAT SERVE THE CITY AND COUNTY OF LA. LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA996099 METROLINK SHUTTLE (CHATSWORTH) Intermodal Transfer Facilities - Bus Stations & Transfer Facilities, Expansion LOS ANGELES, CITY LA0B7002 OF COMMERCE LA0C37 LOS ANGELES, CITY LA008242 OF SOUTHERN CALIF LA008315 REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA008319 LOS ANGELES LA008413 COUNTY MTA MONTEBELLO LA55201 SANTA MONICA LA57101 SANTA MONICA LA57108 FOOTHILL TRANSIT LA963526 ZONE LONG BEACH PUBLIC LA973029 TRANSPORTATION COMPANY LOS ANGELES COUNTY 2001 2001 2001 2001 ATHENS/LENNOX/WILLOWBROOK/FLORENCE ET AL BUS SHELTER 2000 INSTALLATION -ENHANCE PASSENGER FACILITIES AT BUS STOPS, IMPROVE PASSENGER COVENIENCE BUS STOP IMPROVEMENTS - CONSTRUCTION OF PASSENGER 2001 SHELTERS AND INF ORMATION KIOSKS BUS STOP IMPROVEMENTS ON SAN FERNANDO ROAD & TC 2003 LIGHTING; ENHANCE PASSENGER FACILITIES AT THREE BUS STOPS WITH GREATEST NUMBER OF DAILY BOARDINGS ON EAST SIDE OF SAN FERNANDO ROAD . ELECTRIC BIKE AND SCOOTER DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, 2001 PURCHASE OF ELECTRIC BIKES AND SCOOTERS AS A TEST FOR FEASIBILITY AS SUBSTITUTES FOR SHORT COMMUTE TRIPS TO PARK AND RIDE LOTS. TAXI/SHUTTLE STANDS AT METRO RED LINE STA AT N HLWD & 2001 UNIVERSAL. CITY AUTHORIZED TAXI STANDS AT TWO METRO RED LINE STATIONS (UNIVERSAL CITY ON LANKERSHIM AND N. HLWD ON CHANDLER. METRO RAPID BUS STATIONS -PHASE II; INCLUDES 2003 COMMUNICATIONS & EQUIPMENT CONTINUING PROJECT - BUS STOP IMPROVEMENTS, AMENITIES, 2001 SHELTERS, ETC BUS FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 2001 BUS STOP AMENITIES 1999 BUS STOP ENHANCEMENT 2002 BUS STOP AMENITIES 2001 LA974181 LAC+USC MEDICAL CENTER BUS TRANSIT STATION FACILITY WILL 1998 HAVE 4 BUS BAYS AND 4 LAYOVER BAYS BUS STOP IMPROVEMENT PRJ 2003 2003 2003 2003 2002 2002 2008 2005 2003 2005 2010 2005 2003 2003 2004 2002 43 ARCADIA LA990712 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA996106 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT RIV32237 AGENCY NEW & EXPANDED SHUTTLE SERVICE THRU DOWNTOWN ARCADIA 2001 2003 CONNECTING HOTELS & BUSINESSES TO SANTA ANITA RACE TRAK & FASHION MALL (HUNTINGTON ST) & PROPOSED TRANSIT STATION DOWNTOWN PRKING MGMT ORDINANCE PRKNG ORD, TO MANAGE 2002 2003 PRKNG SUPPLY IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PURCHASE BUS STOP AMENITIES 2002 2005 AND OPERATION SUPPLIES Non -motorized Facilities - Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities, New UPLAND 2001015 SANBAG 200074 SANTA MONICA LA030001 WHITTIER LA0B7322 SANTA CLARITA LA0B7335 SANTA CLARITA LA008156 LOS ANGELES, CITY LA008380 OF AGOURA HILLS LA990362 BELLFLOWER LA996275 COMPTON LA0B7326 SAN CLEMENTE SP/PE RIGHT-OF-WAY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAIL - PHASE II 2002 (PART OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL) CONSTRUCT 2.25 MILES OF BIKE/PED FROM EUCLID AVE TO ABANDONED ROW TO THE CLAREMONT AVE LUMP SUM - TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES 2001 PROJECTS FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY-BIKE/PED PROJECTS CALIFORNIA INCLINE SIDEHILL VIADUCT BR 53C0543 ADD, INCLUDED 1998 INSTATE IN STATE HBRR PROGRAM (0.-3 MILE, 1-S, 1-N) SIDEWALK/BIKEWAY WIDENING & SEISMIC WHITTIER GREENWAY TRAIL -ACQUISITION, DESIGN, AND 2000 CONSTRUCT OF 2 MILES CLASS I BIKE/PED PATH ON AN ABANDONED RAIL ROW FROM NORWALK TO FIVE POINTS SANTA CLARA RIVER REGIONAL TRAIL -DESIGNING OF 7 MILES OF 2002 CLASS I BIKE/PED PATH ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE RIVER FROM 1-5 ON THE WEST TO DISCOVERY PARK ON THE EAST SANTA CLARITA REGIONAL COMMUTER TRAIL - 1-5 TO FAIRWAYS 2003 DRIVE; CONSTRUCTION AND SOME ACQUISITION OF 1 .0 MILES OF CLASS I BIKE PATH AND A BRIDGE RESTORATION ADJACENT TO SANTA CLARA. CHINATOWN/COLLEGE STREET BLUE LINE STATION ENHANCEMENT- 2002 FEATURES CONSIST OF A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY BRIDGE; A BUS STATION AND A BIKE STATION. CITYWIDE STREET AND BIKE PATH PROJ (T21-939) 2000 WEST BRANCH GREENWAY MULTI -MODAL TRANS. CORRIDOR 2003 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT 2.5 MILE CLASS I BIKE PATH ALONG MTA- OWNED SANTA ANA BRANCH ROW INCL. PEDESTRIAN AND LANDSCAPING COMPTON CREEK BIKEWAY EXTENSION - PHASE III.DESIGN & 1997 CO NSTRUCT .6 MI OF CLASS 1 BIKE/PED P ATH FROM GREENLEAF BLVD TO ARTESIA FWY.WILL INC BIKE PATH, PED WALKWAY SIGNAGE, STRIPING 2003 2004 2003 2004 2005 2006 2004 2003 2003 2005 0RA990451 MULTI -USE TRAIL IN SAN CLEMENTE CONSTUCTED PARALLEL TO 2000 2004 2007 RAILROAD TRACKS. 2.6 MILES LONG. 44 VARIOUS AGENCIES ORA990906 LUMP SUM. TEA FUNDS FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITY 2000 PROJECTS THROUGHOUT ORANGE COUNTY, SANBAG SBD031505 VARIOUS LOCATIONS - LUMP SUMS LTF, ARTICLE 3 2000 BIZ;YCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS Non -motorized Facilities - Bicy cle & Pedestrian Facilities, E xpansion LONG BEACH LA008163 BIKEWAY AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS, 1.2 MILE CLASS I BIKE/PED PATH FROM WALNUT AVE TO WILLOW ST AT THE BLUE LINE STATION, LA974124 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD TRANSIT PARKWAY TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN AND BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SANTA MONICA BLVD IN WEST LOS ANGELES, SPANS 2 .5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA996289 SOUTH BAY BIKE TRAIL PED. ACCESS RAMPS/SIDEWALKS - DESIGN OF RAMPS, WALKWAYS TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE STH. BAY TRAIL AT DOCKWEILER STATE BEACH LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA Non -mo torized Facilities - Bicycl e Facilities, New LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA000274 MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA002633 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0B7330 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA0B7337 MTA PALMDALE LA008147 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA008164 LOS ANGELES, CITY LA008324 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA008330 OF 2002 1993 2002 FROM SEPULVEDA TO MORENO CONTRUCT DIVIDED PKWAY WITH 1997 TRANSIT PKWAY IMPROVEMENTS, BIKE LANES & RT, 2/405 INTERCHANGE (94CFP; CAT. 2, 210, 98STIP00027) TEA21-#1531 THOMPSON CREEK BICYCLE TRAIL (93/97 CFP; BIKE PROGRAM) CLASS 1 (2 MILES) SAN FERNANDO ROAD ROW BIKE PATH PHASE II -CONSTRUCT 2.75 MILES CLASS I FROM FIRST ST TO BRANFORD ST, ON MTA-OWNED ROW PARALLEL TO SAN FERNANDO RD. LINK CYCLISTS TO NUMEROUS BUS LINE CHANDLER BLVD ROW BIKE PATH: 170 FWY TO LA VALLEY COLLEGE -DESIGN OF 2.3 MILES OF BIKEWAY AND OPTIONAL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY FROM 170 FWY TO LOS ANGELES VALLEY COLLEGE SIERRA BIKEWAY RAILROAD OVERCROSSING. PROPOSE A ,34 MILE CLASS 1 BIKE PATH PROVIDING A GRADE SEPARATION AT AVE . Q OVER THE UNION PACIFIC/METROLINK RAILS, EXPOSITION BLVD RIGHT-OF-WAY BIKE PATH-WESTSIDE EXTENSION. DESIGN OF 4.5 MILES OF CLASS 1 BIKEWAY, LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING & INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. BICYCLE PARKING AT FIVE BLUE LINE STATIONS -PROJECT WILL INSTALL BICYCLE PARKING AND LOCKERS AT FIVE OF THE SIX PASADENA BLUE LINE STATIONS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF LA, BICYCLE COMMUTER TECHNOLOGY ACCESS, CITY'S WEB PAGE FOR BICYCLE PROGRAM 1993 2001 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2007 2004 2005 2002 2006 2003 2003 2005 2005 2006 2007 2003 2006 45 SANTA MONICA LA960192 THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA VARIOUS BIKE RACKS 2001 2002 AND LOCKERS LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA962071 L.A. RIVER BIKE PATH OVER LOS FELIZ BLVD. CLASS I AND CLASS II 2001 2003 [CALL # 2071, MOU P. 0002-071 ON 6/30/99] CALTRANS LA962216 TOPANGA CANYON BLVD. BIKE LANE (96 CFP PROJ) CLASS II 2001 2003 (RESTRIPE TO ADD LANE_- 7 MILES) LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA974083 CHANDLER/BURBANK BIKE PATH-WHITEOAK TO PIERCE COLLEGE A 2002 2003 MTA 3. 2 MILE CLASS I BIKEWAY ON MTA'S CHANDLER/BURBANK RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL IMPROVE NON -MOTORIZED ACCESS (COMBINED W/LA974078) CALABASAS LA974100 U.S, 101 INTERJURISDICTIONAL BIKELANE GAP CLOSURE 1999 2003 CONSTRUCTION 4.5 MILES OF BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO CLOSE SEVERAL GAPS WITHIN A 12 MILE CO RRIDOR(TEA21-#69) SANTA MONICA LA990726 BIKE RACKS (CFP/6089) 2001 2006 LOS ANGELES, CITY LA996241 CHANDLER BIKEWA Y EXTENSION -DESIGN & CONSTRUCT .5 MILE 2002 2004 OF EXT, CYCLIST SHOWER AND LOCKER FACILITY AT HISTORIC TRAIN STATION ACROSS FROM CHANDLER BLVD. FROM THE METRO RED LINE STATION. ORANGE, CITY OF ORA990452 TUSTIN BRANCH RAIL TRAIL (SANTA ANA RIVER TO FAIRHAVEN ST) 2000 2003 2006 CONVERT RAILS TO BIKE TRAIL THROUGH VILLA PARK AND ORANGE. CONNECTS 9 MILE TRAIL. Non -mo torized Facilities - Bicycle Facilities,_Expansion LOS ANGELES, CITY LA008318 LA CITY AND SORROUNDING COMMUNITIES BICYCLE MAP -PROJECT 2002 2004 OF WILL UPDATE BIKEWAY MAPPING INFO. FOR THE CITY OF LA AND PLOT BYCYCLE LANE AND PATH INFORMATION ON A NEW MAP. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA996285 SOUTH BAY BIKE TRAIL RECONSTRCT AT PLAYA DEL REY - DESIGN 2002 2005 AND RECONSTRCT SEGMENT OF THE TRAIL AT DOCKWEILER STATE BEACH. LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA996288 SAN GABRIEL RVR. BIKE TRAIL REHAB PHASE I - FROM WHITTIER 2002 2005 NARROWS DAM TO FLORENCE AVE. Non -motorized Facilities - Pedestrian Facilities, New COMMERCE LOS ANGELES COUNTY MTA CALTRANS SANTA MONICA 927108 ALAMEDA CORRIDOR IN COMMERCE AT ATLANTIC BOULEVARD AND 2001 2002 TELEGRAPH ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LA002738 BIKEWAY/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER LA R RIVER AT TAYLOR YARD 1994 2002 CLASS I (CFP 738, 2077) LAOB420 IN VAN NUYS - MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER - 2001 2002 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AND LANDSCAPING LA0B7267 CROSSWAY ENHANCEMENTS ALONG TRANSIT CORRIDOR- 2001 2002 ENHANCEMENTS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO EXISTING AND PLANNED TRANSIT FACILITIES ALONG SANTA 46 SOUTH PASADENA LA0B7271 LOS ANGELES, CITY LA0B7278 OF LOS ANGELES, CITY LA0B7285 OF LOS ANGELES, CITY LA0B7290 OF LOS ANGELES, CITY LA0B7293 OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE LA960142 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA0B416 IRVINE O RA99080 2 BLUE LINE PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS- 2002 INCLUDE SIGNAGE, UPGRADES CROSSWALKS, PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING, ENHANCED SIDEWALK AROUND THE STATION IN THE AREA MISSION ST STATION NORTHEAST COMMUNITY LINKAGES PHASE II -HIGHLIGHT 2002 PEDESTRIAN CONNCTNS W/RAIL & BUS LINES ALONG MARMION WAY AND AT PASADENA AVE, FIGUEROA ST, FRENCH AVE, AND AVE 45, 50, 60, 61 . ALISO VILLAGE PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE PROJECT -LINK THE NEW 2002 RECONSTRUCTED ALISO VILLAGE PUBLIC HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO THE 2ND ST TRANSIT WAY & METRO RAIL STATION AT FIRST AND BOYLE ST. VERMONT SIDEWALK WIDENING/TRANSIT AVENIDA: EXPOSITION 2001 BLVD TO I -10 -ENHANCE THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT/INCREASE SAFETY ON VER MONT AVE SAN PEDRO PEDESTRIAN WAY -PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 2001 WAYS LINKING EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES AND PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE TO SURROUNDING & OTHER DESTINATIONS IN DOWNTOWN SAN PEDRO LINDERO CANYON ROAD FROM AGOURA RD TO JANLOR DR 1999 CONSTRUCT BIKE PATH, RESTRIPE STREET, INTERSECTION WIDENING, SIGNAL COORDINATION, RAMP WIDENING (TEA21-#65) IN LOS ANGELES - DOWNTOWN OVER FREEWAY 101 - PEDESTRIAN 2002 BRIDGE ENHANCEMENT IRVINE AMTRAK STATION BUILD PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING AND 1999 LANDSCAPING Non -moto rized Facilities - Pedestrian Facilities, Expansi on LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY EL MONTE LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA0B7274 LA0B7288 LA0B7296 LA008174 CITYWIDE ST PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT -CONSISTS OF A SERIES 2002 OF STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS WITHIN DOWNTOWN LA DESIGNED TO STRENGTHEN THE PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE BETWEEN DOWNTOWN DESTINATIONS. GRAND AVE. REALIGNMENT AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS- 2001 GRAND AVENUE BETWEEN TEMPLE AND SECOND STREET; CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO BLOCK REALIGNMENT OF GRAND AVENUE IN DOWNTOWN L. A CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.LOCATED AT RAMONA 2002 BLNALLEY BL, PECK RDNALLEY BL, PECK RD/LOWER AZUSA RD, PECK RD/RAMONA BL, RAMONA BL/SANTA ANITA LITTLE TOKYO PEDESTRIAN LINKAGES. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: SIDEWALK AND CRO SSWALK ENHANCEMENTS, STREET FURNITURE & LANDSCAPING TO PROM OTE PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL W/IN LITTLE TOKYO. 2001 2000 2003 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2004 2001 2002 2003 2004 2004 47 LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA008209 HOLLYWOOD MEDIA DISTRICT -PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS. 2004 2005 INCLUDING SMART CROSSWALKS, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, LANDSCAPING ETC. BET. BUS STOPS ALONG SANTA MONICA BLVD, VINE ST AND HIGHLAND AVE. SANTA CLARITA LA973024 IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRNSIT STOPS, INSTALLING 2001 2003 CROSSWALKS, SIDE- WALKS, AND PEDESTRIAN -ACTUATED TRAFFIC SIGNALS.@ 17 TRANSIT STOPS VARIOUS LOCATIONS, PROJECT EXEMPT PASADENA LA974129 PASADENA BLUE LINE COMMUNITY LINKAGES PEDESTRIA N 1999 2003 IMPROVEMENTS TO TWO PLANNED METRO PASADENA BLUE LINE STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY MANHATTAN BEACH LAOB418 IN MANHATTAN BEACH - MARINE AVENUE BETWEEN SEPULVEDA 2001 2003 BLVD (STATE ROUTE 1) AND VALLEY/ARDOMOR PEDESTRIAN AND AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENTS RIALTO SBD59203 PEDESTRIAN FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AT RIALTO METROLINK 2000 2003 STATION IN BETWEEN ORANGE AND RIVERSIDE AVENUES (IN ALLEY WAY IN BETWEEN METROLINK AND DOWNTOWN BUSINESS DISTRICT Information -based Strategies - Marketing and Promotion of Rideshare and lntermodal Services LOS ANGELES COUNTY 927333 RIDESHARE ACTIVITIES 1997 2005 MTA SANBAG 94163 RIDESHARE ACTIVITIES FOR SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN 2002 2007 LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA008109 COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION SYS. AWARENESS & 2001 2007 MTA SATISFACTIO N. PROJECT WILL USE AND EXPAND UPON IT'S PREDECESSOR'S WORK, THE SERVICE PLANNING MARKET RESEARCH PROGRAM (SPM RP) FOR TRANSIT LOS ANGELES LAOC8118 TDM PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT 2002 2004 COUNTY MTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA991305 RIDESHARE 2000/CLUB METRO- EXTEND AND EXPAND IMPLEMNT. 2000 2005 MTA INCNTIVE PRGM. TO ENCOURAGE USE OF ALT, MODES OF TRAVEL OTHER THAN DRIVING ALONE. ORANGE COUNTY ORA65002 RIDESHARE SERVICES RIDEGUIDE, DATABASE, CUSTOMER INFO, TRANS AUTHORITY AND MARKETING, (ORANGE COUNTY PORTION). (OCTA) RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV520111 REGIONAL RIDESHARE 2002 2005 TRANS COMMISSION (RCTC) Information -based Strategies - Intelligent Transportation Systems/Control System Computerization CALTRANS LA962214 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FROM 1995 2003 MCCLURE TUNNEL TO TRANCAS CANYON RD TRAFFIC MAN. & BUS SPEED IMPROVEMNT(TEA21-#707) 48 CORONA RIV010227 CORONA AUTOMATED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS) 2002 2005 Information -based Strategies - Real-time Rail, Transit or Freeway Notification Systems LOS ANGELES COUNTY LA008316 LONG BEACH PUBLIC LA008320 TRANSPORTATION COMPANY LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LA008321 LONG BEACH LA008331 FOOTHILL TRANSIT LA9811007 ZONE SCAG LA996082 SCAG LA996083 MISSION VIEJO ORA990902 SCAG RIV62103 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION PROJECT (TIP). EQUIP COUNTY 2002 EMPLOYEES AT 41 SITES THROUGHOUT LA COUNTY WITH THE TOOLS NEEDED TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALIZED TRANSIT ITINERARIES ETC. SOUTHEAST REGIONAL TR ANSIT INFORMATION NETWORK -WILL 2002 MAKE USERS IDENTIFY THE TRANSIT OPTION THAT BEST MEETS THEIR INDIVIDUAL NEEDS BY SERVING AS A ONE STOP SOURCE. LA CULTURAL TOURISM WEB PAGE DEVELOP & TRANSIT 2001 PROMOTION . ENCOURAGES THE USE OF MASS TRANSIT AT TARGETED TRIP GENERATION NODES AND FACILITATE MASS TRANSIT USE TO REG, DESTINATIONS. LONG BEACH WAYFINDING/TRANSIT CONNECTION PROGRAM- 2002 MAJORITY OF SIGNS WILL BE PEDESTRIAN, AND WILL INCLUDE MAPPING THAT DISPLAYS DESTINATIONS AND TRANSIT OPTIONS . CUSTOMER SERVICES KIOSK PROJECT 2001 1999 WEB ACCESS VANPOOL INFO SYS DEV & IMPLMENT DATABSE FOR VANPOOLS, VACANCIES COMMUTER CHANNEL NON -MONETARY SUBSCRIPTION SRVCE MISSION VIEJO (CITYWIDE) REMOTE TMC AND TRAVLER/PUBLIC INFO ACCESS CENTER. PROVIDES TRAFFIC INFO TO PUBLIC LIBRARIES, EST COMM INTERTIE BETWEEN CITY AND CALTRANS ITS TRANSIT PROJECT INCLUDES AUTOMATED VEHICLE LOCATOR, GLOBAL POSITION SAT:MOBILE DATA TERMINALS 1999 1999 2002 2005 2003 2005 2004 2003 2002 2002 2004 1999 2002 49 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTA TION COMMISSION DATE: June 16, 2003 Technical Advisory Committee TO: Shirley Medina, Program Manager FROM: SUBJECT: RTIP/FTIP Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. BACKGROUND: RTIP/FTIP Amendment #04 — Amendment #04 is due to SCAG on June 27, 2003. Projects included in this amendment will include projects from the 2004 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). A summary of projects will be handed out at the meeting. If agencies have project amendments they want to include in this amendment, they need to have them submitted to RCTC by June 20, 2003. Project Descriptions — Projects must be described in the RTIP/FTIP as accurately as possible. FHWA's and Caltrans reviews the project description, funding amounts, and program years to make sure they are consistent with the environmental document and obligation package. Prior to environmental clearance and the obligation package submittal, lead agencies should review the project in the RTIP/FTIP. Agencies should also be prepared to make amendments to the project description in the event the environmental document process requires a change in description or limits. You can review the RTIP/FTIP on the SCAG website at www.scag.ca.gov or call Ken Lobeck or Shirley Medina at (909) 787-7141 and we will fax you a copy.